Loading...
0 CAROL WAY - & WEATHERLY DRIVE - BUILDING INSPECTION . CAROL WAY 6 WEATHERLY DRIVE Permit Listing Report by District - District Address(Work Location) District Zoning Owner Work Category Est.Cost Proposed Use And Detail Permit Type Permit No Online Permit No Permit Status Date Issued Contractor(Phone#) Work Description Fees Paid Check# 1 CAROL WAY(1 Carol R3 TGM VMNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Residential Other Way Apt 504) ASSOCIATES L P Gas G-284-13 Expired Jan-14-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 (1)UNIT HEATER jbh $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VMNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Residential Other ASSOCIATES L P Gas g-325-14 Expired Feb-24-2014 Total Temperature Control(781)224-2400 bsmt 1 furnace $30.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VMNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES LP Gas g-419-13 Expired Apr-24-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 3rd fl: 1 water heater $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Gas g-476-13 Expired Jun-24-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 2nd fl: 1 water heater $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Gas g-489-13 Expired Jun-24-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 1st fl:1 water heater $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY(0001 R3 ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other CAROL WAY) Plumbing P144-06 Expired Oct-19-2005 CLANCY PLUMBING P144-06 148 METERS DR $3,380.00 9408 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-147-14 Expired Oct-07-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(97 8)766-6298 1st fl: I hot water tank $80.00 x GeoTM SIR 2015 Des Lamiers Mtin icipa]Solutions,Inc. Page 2 of 4 - ti Permit Listing Report by D[Stl'Ict Printed On: Thu Jul 16,2015 SQL Statement Street No.like"t"AND Street like"CAROL WAV' District Address(Work Location) District Zoning Owner Work Category Est.Cost Proposed Use And Detail Permit Type Permit No Online Permit No Permit Status Date Issued Contractor(Phone#) Work Description Fees Paid Check# 1 CAROL WAY(0001 R3 Archstone Properties 437 $90,000.00 Commercial Assembly, Recreational CAROL WAY) NonresidentiaLaddilions,alt eralions,conv. Building 170-05 Expired Sep-07-2004 KARSTEN COMPANY 170-05 ADDITION 900 SQ.FT.TO CLUB ROUSE TJS $905.00 145191 1 CAROL WAY R3 TCM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Gas g-124-14 Expired Oct-07-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 1st IF I water heater $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES LP Gas g-131-14 Expired Oct-21-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 4th fl: I water heater $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Gas g-157-14 Expired Nov-18-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 3rd 11 1 water healer $85.00 x I CAROL WAY R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P � Gas g-181-13 Expired Oct-31-2012 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 5th IF 1 water heater $85.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM GAS $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Gas g-283-14 Expired Feb-10-2014 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 2nd fl: 1 water heater $85.00 x GeoTMS®2015 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. Page 1 of 4 Permit Listing Report by District District Address(Work Location) District Zoning Owner Work Category Est.Cast Proposed Use And Detail Permit Type Permit No Online Permit No Permit Status Date Issued Contractor(Phone#) Work Description Fees Paid Check# 1 CAROL WAY R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-152-14 Expired Oct-21-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 4th fl: i hot water tank $80.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES LP Plumbing p-190-14 Expired Nov-18-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 3rd fl: 1 hot water tank $80.00 x 1 CAROL WAY 123 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-204-13 Expired Oct-314012 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 5th fl: t hot water tank $80.00 x I CAROL WAY R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM' PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-304-14 Expired Feb-10-2014 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 2nd fl: 1 hot water tank $80.00 x 1 CAROL WAY(1 CAROL R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Residential Other WAY APT 504) ASSOCIATES LP Plumbing P-307-13 Expired Jan-14-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 (1)HOT WATER TANK jbh $80.00 x 1 CAROL,WAY R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-462-13 Expired Apr-24-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 3rd fl: 1 hot water tank $80.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 TOM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TOM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-551-13 Expired Jun-24-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 2nd ft l hot water tank $80.00 x GeoTMS®2015 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. Page 3 of 4 Permit Listing Report by District District Address(Work Location) District Zoning Owner Work Category Est Cost Proposed Use And Detail Permit Type Permit No Online Permit No Permit Status Date Issued Contractor(Phone#) Work Description Fees Paid Check# I CAROL WAY R3 TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC,TGM PLUMBING $0.00 Commercial Other ASSOCIATES L P Plumbing p-565-13 Expired Jun-24-2013 Kingston Plumbing&Heating(978)766-6298 tat fl: i hot water tank $80.00 x 1 CAROL WAY R3 MFFR IV LLC,C/O TGM ASSOCIATES SIGN $4,000.00 Residential Other Sign 2074-08 Expired Jun-23-2008 Denyse Signs SIGN PERMIT AS APPPROVED FOR(MFFR IV LLC) District O TOTALS: ESTIMATED COST: $94,000.00 NUMBER OF PERMITS: 22 FEES INVOICED: $5,800.00 FEES PAID: $5,800.00 BALANCE: $.00 GRAND TOTALS: ESTIMATED COST: $94,000.00 NUMBER OF PERMITS: 22 FEES INVOICED: $5,800.00 FEES PAID: $5,800.00 BALANCE: $.00 GeoTMS®2015 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. Page 4 of 4 , Commonwealth of Massachusetts , { n'; City of Salem 93 Washington St,Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5611 PERMIT REPORT BY ADDRESS Address: 1 CAROL WAY PINPerrnit For r Parcel IDS Occupancy Type' Bulldmg Type Work Descnpttons r Construct 9 Fee Patd ',�'* A+Tv„'„c.' �''!' a ,. ff '� ami'k F ANn :'x,l ,.I .rug>n COst 3 E-15157 ;<5 ' Gas/Oil$urner Install„':, „ �, 210096 `;, Residential - ' ;Multifamily 3+ .: . INSTALL'.NEW GAS-FIRED FIRED 0.00 1500 FURNACE TO REPLACE OLD! .� ONE G14-481 Hot Water Tank 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ WATER HEATER 0.00 85.00 ^;. G 14509 " `Initial Permit Gas,' ; , ""'"210096 ' Residential �,Multifamily 3+ ,_ ,WATER HEATER - 0.00 8500 G-14-594 .- Hot Water Tank - 21-0096 Re ,.. _. esidential Multifamily 3+ 2 WATER HEATER 0.00 170.00 r`G 14-619 • .� Test. Gas - = 21 0096 ' Residential Multifamily 3+ v GAS TEST 0.00 3500- _ - .:; m. • APT:105 - _ _ G-14-623 Initial Permit-Gas 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ WATER HEATER 0.00 80.00 APT 412 G-14-749• '1 ,Remodel and Repair • . '�' 21-0096;' Residential n, ?Multifamily 3+�. ;BSMT' 1 WATER HEATER .. 0.00 " 60.00 G-15-144 Remodel and Repair 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ 1ST FL 1 WATER HEATER 0.00 85.00 ?-G 15186 Remodel and Repair' r 210096 `- Residential ' '.; :MultifamiIy3+ _ 1STFL 1WATER HEATER '> '`r? 0.00 ', 85.00 G 15-211 Remodel and Repair 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ 3RD FL: 1 WATER HEATER 0.00 85.00 cdG-15-260 Initial Permit'Gas 210096 - Residential .. °t'" Multifamily 3+ WATER HEATER 0.00 8500 =. G-15-65 Hot Water Tank 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ G407 NEW WATER HEATER IN 0.00 85.00 UNIT#508 "1 P-14 594';.:- ;1 Plumbing Fixture.-..` . - :21-0096 ;- Residential 4 : Multrfamily 3+ ; +`: =WATER HEATER 0.00 m ;= 80 00 ` P-14-635 1 Plumbing Fixture 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ WATER HEATER 0.00 80.00 ' P-14647, w �; ,1 Plumbing Fixture :. j 210096 = ' Residential - Mullifamtly 3+ � ":WATER HEATER8000 ' ` ... • ., ,. P-14-748 1 Plumbing Fixture 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ 2 WATER HEATERS 0.00 160.00 GP-14-786 - {, :;; "1 Plumbing Fixture - 21-0096: �;Residential - : Multifamily 3+ (� :.WATERHEATER : 0;00 Cr,80.00 .. APT 412 P-14-787 1 Plumbing Fixture 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ WATER HEATER 0.00 15.00 " 'P15-142' =t „c,o l l Plumbing Fixture `-,' °, �' 210096 '-; Residential" ; "_Multifamily 3+,' o-'1 ST FL' 1 WATER HEATER 0.00 ,F-„ 80.00 P-15-184 1 Plumbing Fixture 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ 1ST FL:1 WATER HEATER 0.00 80.00 P15-223 '!I,0 .1 Plumbing Fixture" �' ;"° 210096; `='Residential rMeltrfamily 3+' 3RD FL 1WATER HEATER ." 0.00 - 80.00 P-15-315 1 Plumbing Fixture 21-0096 Residential Multifamily 3+ WATER HEATER 0.00 80.00 1 of 2 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem 93 Washington St,Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 25611 PERMIT REPORT BY ADDRESS t! PIN AF .� ;` m Permit For``*"',.. .� KPaiicel ID Occupancy Type B ,!Building Type �NWork Description ,: '' Construct .fee Paid M' 'x P�. C'ost '.!P-15-68 `-=. al Plumbing Fixture210096 :;'" ;Residential, -' " Multrfamily 3+ t._ P367,ONE WATER HEATER IN'- 0.00 _M00-- Residential, UNIT#508 Total Permits: 23 0.00 1850.00 2of2 Commonwealth of Massachusetts p�. Quo H I , Citv of Salem 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595 x5641 'rAII AY'PPS' Return card to Building Division for Certificate of Occupancy Permit No. B-2005-0271 FEE PAID: $905.00 PERMIT TO B1111iJBILODN' DATE ISSUED: 9/7/2004 This certifies that TGM VINNIN SQUARE LLC, TGM ASSOCIATES L P has permission to erect, alter, or demolish a building m 1 CAROL WAY Map/Lot: 210096-0 4 as follows: 437 Nonresidential:additiorts,alteretions,conv R 170 OS ADDITION 900 SQ. FT. TO CLUB HOUSE TJSni his T w m dx r. r n 3 t ` F 1h 1 f - t C9fl !w { � T Contractor Name: f�- ..:.e' a" SGC ! DBA: r- J ks r '.`,i�Jd iff Contractor License No: s�,`No, n , Fr ,? ZBA Requests for the Village at Vinnin Square Variances 1. Maximum height of buildings Art. VI, §6-4 ; Table I (feet) 2. Maximum height of buildings Art. VI, §6-4 ; Table I (stories) 3. Two principal buildings on a lot Art. II, §2-2 : Definition of "Lot" 4 . Maximum height of fences/boundary Art. VI, §6-4 ; Table I walls 5. Minimum lot area per dwelling Art. VI, §6-4 ; Table I unit 6. Minimum dimension of parking Art. VII, §7-3 (e) (2) (a) stall widths (square feet) 7. Maximum width of entrance and Art. VII, §7-3 (e) (4) (c) exit drives 8. Setback to parking areas Art. VII, 57-3 (e) (5) (b) Special Permits 1. Parking on adjacent lot Art. VII; §7-3 (b) (w/i 400 ft. ) 2. New condominiums Art. V; §5-3 (d) (7) (gift/ of "ittlPm, ttsstttljusetts 3 �Rnttra of ' pFpenl 1, Or --.1 r w n• C:) y DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC, REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY &WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Stephen Harris, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance to the minimum distance between buildings for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive R-3. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1.Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structures involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involve. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Attorney Joseph Correnti, of 63 Federal Street represented the petitioner's. 2. Attorney Tim Davern representing the abutters, voiced approval. 3. There was no opposition to the plan. 4. Petitioners previously had variances approved but have failed to ask for one last Variance for the minimum distance between buildings. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY &WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5 in favor, to grant the variances requested, subject to the following condition; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner is to obtain Building Permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted October 20, 1999 Richard Dionne, Member Board of Appeal DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office-ef the City Clerk. Pursuant to _ Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal L J� A vim \ \ lggq / ��—\ � l �\ 6119311]p.PAY61]WY'ID6 PHASF 3 I 4/ � :'mss _/ ��®....�.e�.. \ .n��' . � �\����• ��6�'�......� ... o—.q Carol Way Residential Development I • -\ .% / -'�,.�"^O�� / \\ y _l \�-u_ �®SY1®.MesYecLuaau Overall Site plan C-3 =cqr so®zo � scuc uu rrer `�' �s �Ys of ""ittlem, ttssttclju�e##s Paurb of '�Appenl V DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC, REQUESTING A VARIANCE D FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Stephen Harris, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance to the minimum distance between buildings for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive R-3. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1.Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structures involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involve. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve l substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Attorney Joseph Correnti, of 63 Federal Street represented the petitioner's. 2. Attorney Tim Davern representing the abutters, voiced approval. 3. There was no opposition to the plan. 4. Petitioners previously had variances approved but have failed to ask for one last Variance for the minimum distance between buildings. n DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5 in favor, to grant the variances requested, subject to the following condition; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city.and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner is to obtain Building Permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having ' jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted _ October 20, 1999 !� Richard Dionne, Member Board of Appeal DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY &WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal p� NOV 2 2 1999 t11K tao t010!20dayshaveexpired ttom On deft tMt hubulnent was received, Old that NO APPEAL has been filed in this office. A True Copy Co✓ ATTEST:_CTTY CLERK, Salem, Mass. C (C' itv of Salem, � uss�cllusetts x j' 19nttra of �kupeal CFc JY 1 s4 'Jr DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held December 17,1997 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Richard Dionne and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, is requesting Variances from maximum height of building, two principal buildings on a lot, maximum height of fence/boundary walls,minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum dimensions of parking stall width, maximum width of entrance and exit drives, setback to parking area & Special 'Permits for parking on adjacent lot and new condominiums for the property located at Carol Way & Weatherly Drive. G^.'t C1 The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is p g q#1g-licatuLe tcf=this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which-pf�—videf as dnllows: V);'nN Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in fh�s OrdinarR, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure[Ra, conuiti� set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits fer altelp�tionz and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for c nges, 'Anlarg�ment, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, s ructurd, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAP & WEATHERLY DRIVE page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the Petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans. makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Petitioner was represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti of Serifini, Serifini & Darling. 63 Federal Street. Salem. 2 . The requested relief consists of several variances and Special Permits for the final phase (Phase IV) of construction of The 'tillage at Vinnin Square, a residential development. 3 . The Village project commenced in the 1980 's and the developers, the Zieff family, has been involved with the project since 1983. 4 . The entire Village project, including Phase IV, consists of over 48 acres and will leave 516 residential units when completed. The original plans for the entire project at its inception, called for approximately 550 units . 3 . Phase Int of the Village project will consist of 178 residential units and parking over three (31 lots covering ten (101 acres. 6. The three lots of Phase IV are unique in size and shape and the land has peculiar topography and consists of large areas of ledge and rock outcropping and large areas of wetlands . 7. The property on which the Village sits also has a large pond and has large differences in land variations. 8. The developers concerned public discussions of the plans for construction of Phase IV of the Village project in ;larch 1997 at an Open House, and the official Planning Board process of site plan review began in April 1997. 9. The developers and the trustees of the Condominium Associations for Phase I , iI and !Ii of the Village met over several months to discuss the plans for Phase IV, and an agreement was reached between the developer and the Trustees of Phase 1, 11, and III of the Village with respect to the plan and petition submitted to the Board. 10. The agreement between the Trustees and the developer was the result of months of negotiations and the plans and petition as submitted to the Board incorporated amendments suggested by the Trustees and other residents of the Village relating to traffic flow, improvements of recreational facilities and parking among other things. 11 . Attorney George W. Atkins of Salem, representing the Trustees of Phase . K. and III of the Village spoke in favor of the petition and plans as submitted as it incorporated matters which were the subject of negotiations. 12. The Trustees of Phase I and II of the 'tillage unanimously endorsed the petition and pians. and four of five trustees of Phase IV of the Village approved of the Dian and petition. VW 'WITIS 011 1.1 00110314,j E :Z d Z- JVW OfI7, 1d3G DNIGIM DEC K ON OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE page three 13. Several homeowners at the Village spoke in favor of the petition. 14. August Miller, 70 Weatherly Drive, Chairman of the Trustees' negotiating team, spoke in favor of the plan citing significant changes made to the plans to address concerns about traffic flow. the number of buildings proposed and entrance problems . Tests performed by the developer to address concerns about water pressure and sewage were also mentioned. 15 . The original plans for Phase IV of the Village called for four (4) buildings which was reduced to three (3) in the plans submitted. 16. The proposed plan has allowed for approximately 10% open space calculations over the effected three lots. 1; . Several homeowners and a Trustee of Phase IV of the Village spoke in opposition to the plans and petition citing concerns for traffic flow, property value, architectural design, sidewalk accessibility and other matters. 18. The proposed Phase IV of the Village project must still undergo site plan review before the Planning Board, and Beth Debski, Assistant Citv Planner, stated that traffic flow concerns, utility and architectural design issues were subject to review and approval by the Planning Board. 19. Lot D2 as reflected on the plans will consist of a landscaped parking lot with 25 spaces being exclusively dedicated to a nursing home on abutting property and 38 spaces will be attributed to parking for building sited on Lot A of the plans. 20. Due to the existing ledge on the property, outcropping,topography of the land, existing pond and large wetlands, combined with the large differences in land elevations between the lots and odd shapes, the siting of buildings for Phase IV of the Village project is restricted. 21 . It was represented by counsel for the developer that they would accept as a condition of the requested relief that developer will use access to Loring Tower Road for a means of exit from the two buildings located on Lot B of the pians. 22. The height of the 6-plex existing in Phase I-III of the Village are approximately 40 feet above ground, and the height of the existing mid- rise in Phases I-III are approximately 66 feet above ground. 23. The proposed building on Lot B will be approximately 56 feet above ground. 2» . The proposed construction of Phase IV of the Village will complete construction of the project. 25. Because of the topography of the land, and in order to allow the developer to work with the natural topography of the land, some walls on the property may exceed six feet. 26. The petitioner requested he following relief from the Zoning Ordinance; A` Variance from maximum height of building in feet with respect to lots A and B. B. Variance from maximum height of building in stories with respect to lot B. C. Variance for two principal building on one lot with respect to lot B. VW lw3lvs jo AP SE -Z d Z- M09 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page four D. Variance from maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls for lots A and B. E. Variance from minimum lot area per dwelling units for lots A & B. F. Variance from minimum widths of parking stalls in underground garages for lots A & B. G. Variance from maximum widths of entrance and exit drives for lot A & B. H. Variance from 2 front setback requirement for parking areas. I. Special Permit to allow parking on adjacent lot with respect to lots A and D2. ?J. Special Permit to allow new condominiums. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0 to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes ordinances and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction. S. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure VW 343TIS 20 A ! M 7 . Petitioner shall obtainlio �rY',street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 5E :Z d Z- IN OR? Id30 9N1M11f1i DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page five 8. Petition is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission have jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board for Site Plan Review and the Conservation Commission. Variance & Special Permit Granted December 17, 199, Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED .WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Date A U-G ? 31999 I hereby certify that 20 days have expired from the date this instrument was received, and that NO APPEAL has been filed In this `631 dS JO ),11"office. ^3r413J " A True Cop r �i� ��lG�✓ Z- W1 UNP ATTEST:_CITY CLERK, Salem, Mass. 5� Z d 1830 JPU9l1?i . S Ctv of "'5ttlrm, (Mttssadjusrtts 'Q �13varb of '�Fpezd r� ' L7 L7 T� C:)r y W n. C) a Cr DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC, REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY &WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Stephen Harris, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance to the minimum distance between buildings for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive R-3. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1.Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structures involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involve. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Attorney Joseph Correnti, of 63 Federal Street represented the petitioner's. 2. Attorney Tim Davern representing the abutters, voiced approval. 3. There was no opposition to the plan. 4. Petitioners previously had variances approved but have failed to ask for one last Variance for the minimum distance between buildings. t 4 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY &WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5 in favor, to grant the variances requested, subject to the following condition; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner is to obtain Building Permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted October 20, 1999 CSS-r``J Richard Dionne, Member Board of Appeal DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal CHU of .Salem, ��IHttssttcliusetts �Raara of �ppeal AMENDED DECISION CITY Ci ; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held December 17, 1997 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Richard Dionne and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, is requesting a Variance from maximum height of building, two principal buildings on a lot, maximum height of fence/boundary walls, minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot area per dwelling unit,minimum dimensions of parking stall width, maximum width or entrance and exit drives, setback to parking area & Special Permits for parking on adjacent lot and new condominiums for the property located at Carol Way & Weatherly Drive. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. 0`3A133 �E 'Z CJ z- rota 1430 BNIGIM",' DECISIO`' OF THE PETITION OF VI.:\'IN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL wAY 6 VEATIKERLY OF page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detrintent t public good and without nujlifying or substantially derogating intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence or and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Petitioner was represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti of Serif: Serifini S Darling, 63 Federal Street , Salem. 2. The requested relief consists of several variances and Special P for the final phase (Phase IV) of construction of The Village at Square, a residential development. 3. The Village project commenced in the 1980's and the developers. Zieff family, has been involved with the project since 1953. 4 . The entire Village project , including Phase IV, consists of over 48 acres and will leave 516 residential units when completed. T original plans for the entire project at its inception, called f" approximately 550 units. i. Phase IV of the Village project will consist of 118 residential and parking over three (3) AOCS covering ten (10) acres. 6. Tlic three jots of Phase 1. are unique in size and shape and the has peculiar topography and consists of large areas of ledge and outcropping and large areas of wetlands . The property on which the Village sits also has a large pond and targe differences in land variations. S . The developers concerned public discussions of the plans for - construction of Phase IV of the Village project in March 1991 at Open House, and' the official Planning Board process Of site plan began in April 1991 . i . The developers and the trustees Of the Condominium Associations i Phase I , 11 and All Of the 'Village met over several months to dis the plans for Phase IV, and an agreement was reached between the developer and the Trustees of Phase I , IA , and III of the Village with respect to the plan and petition submitted to the Board. 10. The agreement between the Trustees and the developer was the res :nO ACh$ of negotiations and the plans and petition as submitted t'. Board incorporated amendments suggested by the Trustees and oche: residents of the Village relating to traffic flow, iruprovemients c recreational I III ACs and parking among other things. I1 . Attornev George W. Atkins of Salem, representing the Trustees Of 1 , II , and All of the Village SpOke in favor of the petition and as submitted as it incorporated matters whic:i were the subject o: bbd 1� "VSj0 ,� 1,•." negotiations . J3 '1� t 2F 12. The Trustees of Phase I and II of the Village unanimously endor-rt petition and plans , and four of five trustees of Phase IIIQH`th= SE :Z d Z_ AVN P1 Village approved of the plan and petition. 1dA DP> JGJIFjt DEC ISI^di: Oc' T'r,E PETiTiDi. Or 'v'1i:i:IN SQUARELLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHE: DRIVE page three 13. Several homeowners at the Village spoke in favor of the petitior 14 . August hiller, 10 Weatherly Drive, Chairman of the Trustees, negotiating team, spoke in favor of the plan citing significant made to the plans to address concerns about traffic flow, the nt buildings proposed and entrance problems . Tests performed by ti developer to address concerns about water pressure and sewage we also mentioned. 1S. The original plans for Phase IV of the Village called for four buildings which was reduced to three (3) in the plans submitted. 16. The proposed plan has allowed for approximately 70% open space calculations over the effected three lots. 17: Several homeowners and a Trustee of Phase III of the Village spo Opposition to the plans and petition citing concerns for traffic fiOw, property value, architectural design, sidewalk accessibil and other matters. 1S. The proposed Phase IV of the Village Project must still undergo pian review before the Planning Board, and Beth Debski , Assistan City Planner , stated that traffic flow concerns , utility and architectural design issues were subject to review and approval the Planning Board. 19 . Lot D2 as reflected on the plans will consist of a landscaped oa lot with 25 spaces being exclusively dedicated to a nursing home abutting property and 38 spaces will be attributed to parking fo building sited on Lot A of the pians. 20. Due to the existing ledge on the property, outcropping, t000graoh the land, existing pond and large weal-ands, combined with the la differences in land elevations between the lots and odd shapes , siting of buildings for Phase 1V of the Village project is restr 21 . It was represented by counsel for the developer that they would as a condition of the requested relief that developer will use a to Loring Tower Road for a means of exit from the two buildings on Lot 3 of the plans. '_ . The height of the 6-plea existing in Phase I-III of the Village approximately 40 feet above ground, and the height of the existi rise in Phases I-III are approximately 66 feet above around. 23. The proposed building on Lot B will be' approximately 56 feet abo around. 2; . The proposed construction of Phase IV of the Village will comple construction of the project. 25 . Because of the topography of the land, and in order to allow the developer to work with the natural topography of the land, some on the property may exceed six feet. 26. The petitioner requested he following relief from the Zoning Ordinance; _ Variance from maximum height of building in feet with respect to lots A and B. 3. :Variance from maximium height of building in stories with respect to lot B and A. C. Variance for two principal building on one lot with respect to lot B. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF Vi :NIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE I+ SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL MAY 6 »EATHERLY D: page four D. Variance from maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls for A and B. E. Variance from minimum lac area per dwelling units for lots - S B. F. Variance from minimum widths of parking stalls in underground gar= for lots A S B. G. Variance from maximum widths of entrance and exit drives for lot H. Variance from 2 front setback requirem? t for parking areas. I . Special Permit to allow paring on adjacent lot with respect to it A and D2. J . Special Permit to allow new condominiums. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence press at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: I . Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3 . The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogatin the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. The Special Permit granted can be ranted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenier and welfare of the city' s inhabitants . Therefore , the Zoning Board 0f Appeal unanimously, 5-0 to grant the re requested, subject to the following conditions: I . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes , codes ordinances and regulations . ? . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer . 3 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke an fire safety shall be SC-:iccly adhered to. Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained . 6 . Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with existing structure . Petlti-.0 Fall Obtain prOOEI- Str2ei numbering from the City of Sa f i' display said number so as to be visible Q e�s;ors O�,.a�a and shall S��''2 street . DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page five 6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board for Site Plan Review and the Conservation Commission. Variance & Special Permit Granted December 17, 1997 Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Date 91999 I hereby certify that 20 days have expired from the date this instrument was received, and that NO APPEAL has been filed in this office. A True Copy ATTEST—CITY CLERK, Salem, Man. �v I �. Ctu of LSalem, ttss�cll.uspY so icE" . a °Q Paura of �Fpeal iaaa n)\il -2 31 REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE (date- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) A hearing on this petition was held on May 19, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Ronald Harrison. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner's Vinnin Square LLC, represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti requests to modify the decision of the petition date stamped December 30, 1997 for the property located at Carol Way &Weathery Drive. The provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which are applicable to the request modification to the Special Permits and Variances and Section 5-3 0) and Section 9-5, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are not generally affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district. REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF VINNIN SQUARE 6� t�OR TH� (j 38 PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY Dk VE(dated- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact 1. This request comes to the Board following an agreement reached in a civil action in Essex Superior Court, C.A. No. 98-00838, brought by neighbors in the appeal of a decision of the Board granting certain variances and special permits to the owners of land known as Phase 4 in the Village of Vinnin Square. 2. The Board's decision was challenged by condominium owners based on objections to the traffic conditions and increased density likely to result from the planned improvements in Phase 4 at the Village at Vinnin Square. 3. Following extended discussions, the parties agree on their desire to modify the Board's decision by making the following specific changes; a. The maximum height of the buildings shall be as follows: Building A will be F.F.E.73, is 4 and ''Yi stories without an attic and will be 56' high. Building D will be F.F.E. 91 or lower, is 4 and % stories without an attic and will be 56' high. b. The principal buildings on Lot 1 shall be 16 townhouses, two 6-unit residential building, and one midrise building (Building D). c. The maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls shall not exceed 10 feet. d. The total number of units in Phase 4 shall not exceed 148 and shall be distributed as follows (1) on Lot 1, one midrise building with 60 units (Building D), 16 townhouses and two 6-unit residential buildings; (ii) on Lot 2, one midrise building with 60 units (Building A). e. The maximum width of entrance and exit drives shall not exceed 36 feet. f. The front setback for parking areas shall not be less than 2 feet from all lot lines and 5 feet from street lines (excluding parking along Weatherly Drive/America Way). 4. In addition to Mark Blair, the Ward Councillor, the following residents spoke in favor of the adoption of the proposed agreement in its entirety: Timothy Davem, Esq., Gardner Gould, Leon McDowell and Hal Rosenthal. 01 r REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC 38 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DR4 (date-2 A '' stamped Dec. 30, 1997) y� page three 5. By written letter, the abutting owners of the Grosvenor Nursing Home objected to the proposed agreement via their attorney, Jeffrey Shribman, Edq. On the basis of the above findings of fad, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve sustantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of this ordinance. 4. The modification requested can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously voted 5-0 to grant the request to modify the decision of Vinnin Square LLC, for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive date stamped Dec. 30, 1997. Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section II, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of this decision, hearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. d, JUN 241999 Board of Appeal IhwelbyaA OdgOdephafllaao*1 1 *smi de data fft habumW isin -P and, W4 that NO APPEAL ha bane ANd In Mdo Office. 1 A True Copy, r �l ATTEST:_CrrY CLERK, Salem, Mass. N OP-2002-0108 Building Permit No.: 498-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at -------- wellingTyp-------------------- Owelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM ------------- _"_ . ..__ ------------------- ._____-__.__" _TowNCity Name . --- - Atltlress IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 113 WEATHERLY DRIVE- SUITE 4 This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires --------------------------------------------- unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date --------------------------------------- aP✓IY Issued On:Thu Apr 11,2002 ----- -- ✓--D�-- --------------- GeoTMS®2002 Des t.auriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------------"-------------- "'-"""""'""""""------ ------- ----- --""------ 00M0 WEATHERLY DRIVE 498-2000 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map: 21 Block: CITY OF SALEM Lot: = 0242 Permit: Building Category: 105 New Five ormor, BUILDING PERMIT Permit#. ; ` 4982000 Project# JS-2001-1139 Est.Cost: $0.00 Fee: $0.00 r PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class:,.,. Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft.): 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units Lost: AT: 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON. 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK Call for e i p l t tO 00c u Py 113 Weatherly Drive-Suite 4-Glover Construct 6-plex dwelling per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET •Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: / Service: >'vt Meter: Footings: �Z1141 Z— Rough: �_a,t-o ff House Foundation: Final. ,(L��j Final: L 01eZ, � RyVrne:QLi Fireplace/Chimney. Gas Fire Department Board of Health �j Insulation: Rou h: z��Z/�Z Oil: 1 FinalO/C Final: < �l Smoke: yljIov 4d/o/V Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLA ON O ANY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001263 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. f; r ` OP-2002-0109 Building Permit No.: 499-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the___ RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM -------- -- --------------------'-----ry---------- Address TowNCi Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 113 WEATHERLY DRIVE- SUITE 5 This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires -------- unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date 91Nn Issued On:Thu Apr 11,2002 ---- / � J "---------------- ---�'�7� j�„( GeoTMS®2002 Des Launers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ � 5 r' 004 WEATHERLY DRIVE 499-2000 his#: 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS •Map: 21 lock: CITY OF SALEM Lor: 0242 Permit: Building ' Category: 105 New Five or,mor- BUILDING PERMIT Permit# 499-2000, Project# JS-2001-1140 Est. Cost: $0.00 Fee: $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const. Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: r ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.'ft): 287496Owner., Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Unitss G Gained:. Units Lost: AT. 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: n I 1. (� t 113 Weatherly Drive-Suite 5-Dalton �I� � ���(��� ` � Construct 6-plex dwelling per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: / Service: /-,7-199 v �- Meter: Footings: Roug .'L��/�6 z Rough: /-11 - 2� House# Foundation: Final: �� Final: / r/p Ron h ramex Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health L//L/OZ Insulation: R Oil: 0i� b Final:G�. Final- !F !�l Smoke: Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY O ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001264 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. OP-2002-0110 Buildin7DEPARTMENT.: 500-2000 Commonwealth of Massachus City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITNTThis is to Certify that the RESIDENCE------------- ----- --- --- ------ DwellingType0000 CAROL WAY in the CM_-_-__--__--__"--__"-_ .-__---__"--_-- -""--_.---_""_-..--._"_-- "-----_---AddressIS HEREBY GRANTED A PERM CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 113 WEATBERLY DRIVE- SUITE6 This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires ----------------------------------- ----- _-.unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date -_-"- I ...----------'--------------------------"------------------ Issued On:Thu Apr 11,2002 ----- -- ---- ---------------- GeoTMS®2002 Des Launers Municipal Solutlons,Inc. ----------------------------------- ----"""" ------------------------------ L " 4 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE 500-2000 GIS#: aoa7 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map 21 •Btock: CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0242 Permit: Building Category: 105 New Five of mot BUILDING PERMIT Permit# 500-2000 - Project#, JS 2001-1141 ' Est:Cost: $0.00' Pee: $0.00 }' ," PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Cons[.Class ''. Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft): 2&7496:' . Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: ' R3, Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained:' AT: 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE Units Lost: " ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: ¢ 113 Weatherly Drive-Suite-6 Dalton Cal` for Permit {to OCCUPY Construct 6-plex dwelling per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service:/-,?-d2 Meter: Footings: Ron �f�`� Rough: / �X,2 -03a,_, d House# Foundation: Finj7%� Final: y/�%Z��V RK g eoU�/Q (�iJ1 0 Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Depart Board of Health Insulation: Ro • �Oil: ,y� Final-op Final lle f Smoke: lop Treasur�.` (0/bc;'-_ THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL ON ANY F ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001265 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMS®1995 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. OP-2002-01 11 Building Permit No.: 501-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT -" This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE---- ----------- located at - ------------------------- - - - Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM ------ -- -------------- _--_-_-__.---_-.._-._ TowNCiry Name Address IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 115 WEATHERLY DRIVE This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires ------------ ----------------- - - - unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date f/C� Issued On:Thu Apr 11,2002 + --rte ------ ----- -------- GeoTMS®2002 Des Launers Municipal solutions,Inc. ---------------- to 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE 501-2000 GIS#: 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map: 21 CITY OF SALEM Block: Lot: 0242 Permit: Building - Category: 102 New single famil BUILDING PERMIT Permit# 501 2000 Project# JS-2001-1142 Est. Cost.. $0.00 Fee: $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft:): 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gaineds AT: 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE Units Lost: ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: Call for Permit to 01ccuPY 115 Weatherly Drive-Townhouse Type#1 Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET . Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: / 3-Ux Meter: Footings: ought ouse# Foundation: Final: Final: -zo/0.2�� RR/VV/,,ee�u�tgh raa,m11/Ie:99iC << Fire�e/Chimne: Fire Department Board of Health Insulation: v Oil: /y ✓�A� Final:CK '��` Fin , Smoke: Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001266 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMSO 1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE 510-2000 Gs#: 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS •Map. 21 lock: CITY OF SALEM Lot 0242' ernut. Building.:,, - Category: IO2 New Single faml` BUILDING PERMIT Permit# 510-2000 ro ect# JS-Nol-1151 = Est:Cost: o $0.00 Fee: $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class,-., Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot,Size(sq.ft-): 2187496 I, Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoung:' - R3' Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units Lost AT: 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK. Call for Permit to ®ccm 123 Weatherly Drive-Townhouse Type#2 Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square.Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: eter: Footings: Ron h• Rough:///�/0/�f/� House# Foundation: "�Z Final: h Rough Fireplace/Chimney:/ Gas Fire Department Board of Health Insulation: Rough: Oil ( G Final Smoke U�}1�'ur /^ Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL ONO ANY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001275 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE 510-2000 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 1 CITY OF SALEM t0242 ernlitni New BUILDING PERMIT tegory: 102 New Single famil elmit# 10-20 j # Stoo1- l-llsl Cost: o0 Z .00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: au.Class: Contractor: License: so - ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 t Size(sq.ft): 87496 Owner: V innin S uare LLC A Ucant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNPnIES oils Gained: nits LA= AT: 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: 1-4, r'- 123 123 Weatherly Drive-Townhouse Type#2 Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square.Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET ector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings rground: Service: Meter: Footings: C' Rough:11—,1- 9 70/f House# Foundation: Final: Rough Frame: Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health Insulation: Roughti'�CI I - 5-- ° / /;ah Oil: p jL G Final: Smoke: 71 weJ asur): THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL ONO ANY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001275 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 Geo7MS®1998 Des Lauriers&Asociatm Inc. 0000 RELIANCE ROW 512-2000 GIs#: 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AblMap:, 2f ; CITY OF SALEM Block. Lot 0242 Peruut Building Category:- 102 New'Single famil' BUILDING PERMIT ermit# r'. 512-2000. Project# .182001-1153 Est Cost; ,$0,w—: , Fee:,': $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class:' Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 LotSize(sq;ft): 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: , ' R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained:'! AT: 0000 RELIANCE ROW Units Lost: ISSUED ON., 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: r, r. Permit y s to "ccU P2 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#2 l Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs &fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: /_3-v/yf�Meter: Footings: Rough: iJ� (0/ Rough:/Q��Q/01�/� House# Foundation: Final: �/ oL Rp° 'g rjf l ydl Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health f� I Insulation: Rou Oil: 3 i2� C Final: Q�( Fin Smoke: Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY O ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001277 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 Geo1'MS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 0000 RELIANCE ROW 514-2000 G S#: , sos7 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS �aloek: CITY OF SALEM Lot; 0241 = permit, Building 1, Category: 1'02 New Single fam ` BUILDING PERMIT Permit# 514=2000 Protect# JS-2601 1 155 st:.Cost: $o.00 Fee: i , $0.00: , PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const:Class: s Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.fti): 287496Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoiungi' 'R3 ; �"_ Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units Lost ' AT. 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: r%n iv r) ¢ 4Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#1 u6il of i GI -ilii to occupy Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: „p�,� Service: /-J-d/ , Meter: Footings: Rough:j n- l 0Rough:��//�/�{ House# Foundation: Fin ��16� Final: d Z Rougoe me: Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health f� Insulation: Roughp��� N Oil: 3 �.V'1 f Final:Q K 16-W Smoke: r' 3�4�02 Treasury: THIS PE IT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY O ITS RUL S AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001279 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 0000 RELIANCE ROW 516-2000 GIs#: 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS •Map: 21 . Block. CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0242 Category:,, Building BUILDING PERMIT Category:,; � 102 New Single famil Permit# - 516-2000 Project#� JS-2001=1157 EsE,Cost: $0.00 Fee: - $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.'&): 287496Owner: VinninSquareLLC Zoning: R3 `" Applicant. ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained':- Units Lost:, .'; AT: 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: n r 6 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#2 6a I I Tur e f I I i i l to occupy Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: /-,?-o/�' Meter: Footings: Rought�'j e �� �l Rough:IQ/�O/�/(l,� House# Foundation: �2 Final: _ (� Ro came:(�),e OZ "7 O.Z /0//71 d Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health �/ Insulation: Rough(��I " l Oil: iv I � , ,,ID { ' , Final:Lq// Final: Smoke: IN^ 3) Final: N/d� t�- Treasury: � j1� THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLA N NY F ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001281 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 0000 RELIANCE ROW 518-2000 Gis#:; 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map zl CITY OF SALEM Block. Lot: ' 0242 Permit: " Building% ; - Category: IO2New,SldglefanaH BUILDING PERMIT Permit# "5.18-2000 r Project JS7200E4159 Est.Cost: ee . " $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class' Z Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft.): 287496 : Owner: Vinnin Squaze LLC Zoning: R3 Applicant., ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained' Units Lost: AT: 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: n„[i rr } I L I 0 ,C 8 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#1 Call fur Perm" C u P J Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET •Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground:' Service: Meter: Footings: Ron Rough:/,_/.PjHouse# Foundation: v Final: a oZ�—O� �y�ys;., trame•Q l trey .ace/Chimney: Gas a epartme t Board of Health ��,� Insulation: on h: Oil: /';�IpY/ G y1071si I2 y1 LW 1" Final: Q�3't%�0� Final: Smoke t�N Treasury: THIS PER MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLA N O NY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001283 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GwTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 0000 RELIANCE ROW 520-2000 GIS#:, 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS •Map - 21. CITY OF SALEM Block Lot:, 0242, Permit. Building Category: 102 New Singlefam 1, BUILDING PERMIT Permit#i 520-2000 Project#'' JS-2001-1160 , Esti Cost: $0.00 ee: $o.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: " Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft,ji 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: R3 i Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gamed: " AT: 0000 RELIANCE ROW Units Lost: ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: 10 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#1 0^ I �( r P i tq.ptcu ny Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs aes on¢ermit j� 0. P POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: f 3—O/ eter: Footings- ough: tp /—d/ House# Foundation: FD��G� Final —o2 Rough 0 Fra6)A610 I /—B Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Departm_e t Board of Health Insulation: Roug"47, orf Oil: I �I�d%�s/ I til CDS Final: 0/( ✓�✓ Final: „ Smoke. b„(i �� 3l y101 Treasury: THIS PE MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UP ;;w_ ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001284 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • -GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. OP-2002-0078 Building Permit No.: 512-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY-OF-SALEM - - - - -------- - Atldress Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 2 Reliance Row Occupancy for Sales &Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires Thursday Apr 4,2002___ _ unless s ersuspended or revoked. Expiration Date -- -- ---- -- - o - -- - Issued On:Mon Mar 4,2002 ------ ------- --- GeoTMS®2002 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. --------------------------------.---------------------------------------------- 0000 RELIANCE ROW 512-2000 Gs#. sos7 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map. - 21 /Block. '' CITY OF SALEM Lot ; 0242" Permit: Building` Category:: t ,_. 102 New Single fan l BUILDING PERMIT ermit# " 512=2000 Project# JS-2001-1153 Est:Cost: = $0.00, ee•: $0.06 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const-Class:: Contractor: License: Use Group: . ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft): 287496 Owner: V innin Square LLC Zoning: R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: AT: 0000 RELIANCE ROW Units Lost. ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: , 2 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#2 V o l I I F er m i to OCCUPY Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs &fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET ,Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings B Underground: n Service: 1-2-al. Meter: Footings: Rough: �/� ,V� Rough:/Q/�O/0l1�/� House# Foundation: Final: j Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health � Insulation: Ron �h- Oil: /�jy� / Final: 61// T Fin Smoke: �! Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY O ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001277 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 i GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. 1. OP-2002-0077 Building Permit No.: 514-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM - - ------------- --------------------------------------- Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 4 Reliance Row Occupancy for Sales & Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires --Thursday Apr 4,_2002------ unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date *__ Issued On: Mon Mar 4,2002 GeoTMS®2002 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ----------------- ------------------------ -------- 00W, RELIANCE ROW 514-2000 Gs#: aos7 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map: 21 , CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0242 ; Permit Building CAtegory 102 New Single fam l BUILDING PERMIT Permit#, 514 2000 Project# JS-2001`1155 Est:Cost. $0.60, ee. ;, $o.00 , - PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: : Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq. ft.): 287496< Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Ping: R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units Lost ' _!. T. 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: o t} to C 4 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#1 �a j i I 1 l lU OCCUPY Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings } Underground: Service: Meter: Footings: Rough:)n- I7'/0I Rough://1���1� House# Foundation: Fin /�<�� Final: Roug Ot, m,�#I/p i'!v Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health � Insulation: RoughpO4� Ol Oil: 16 >> Fina1:6K J� Smoke: 81,40) 4( Treasury: THIS PE IT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY O ITS RUL S AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001279 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. OP-2002-0079 Building Permit No.: 516-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM - ----------------Add-ress--------- --- ------------------ ------------------- TowNCiry Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 6 Reliance Row Occupancy for Sales &Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires Thursday Apr 4,2002 unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Mon Mar 4,2002 -- /J ---- w GeoTMS®2002 Des Launers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------�--------- --- ----; -------------- ----------------------------- 0000 RELIANCE ROW 516-2000 G> p : 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ,Mapj. 2Y, CITY OF SALEM %Block Lot , 0242. Permit: Building Category. , 102'New single fain l BUILDING PERMIT ,516-2000 rojedt#„ .<<, IS-2001=1157 Est. Cost:, " $0.00 Fee: $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: , ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lo[Size(sq:ft):`287496 " ` ;ti' Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Hing R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units-Lost:. : AT. 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: p €� Q mi } } 6 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#2 V al U I 1 1. f I I L Lo ®Clr�py Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET ;r-�Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings F /Underground: Service: /- i o/Meter: Footings: Rough� `' �� �I Rough:1Q/�D/e0/ House# Foundation: Final: Ro rame:04t Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health 7 Insulation: Rough:y(/� 1 Oil• C Final: // Final: Smoke: 3) Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL N NY F ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001281 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. OP-2002-0076 Building Permit No.: 520-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM ------------------ - - ---------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------- -------- Address Town/City Name - IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 10 Reliance Row Occupancy for Sales &Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires Thursday Apr-4,20-02 unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date /j`D`F-4- Issued On:Mon Mar 4,2002 --------- ------ Jhry ' ---- ----------------------------------------- - --�- - --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- GeoTMS®2002 Des Launers Municipal Solutions,Inc. 0000 RELIANCE ROW 520-2000 GIS It: .. 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map 21 " " CITY OF SALEM Lot 0242- Permit Building ` Category:,' 102 New Single fail: BUILDING PERMIT emit#i 520-2000 rolect# - ',;' JS-2001=1160 Est.-'Cost:;' Pee: - $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq. ft.): 287496 Owner., Vinnin Square LLC Zonmg: .1 „ ' R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units Lost: " AT. 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON. 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK. d �+ 10 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#1 on I E r P ( t(� pII�L'u py Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs ees n ermit j 0. `j' I"J POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET f- Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings - Underground: Service: f —O/ eter: Footings: ough: 1�' /—d/ �House# Foundation: FD��G� Final: Rough t� .a I—O 6k) Kr cW49 0I Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health / Insulation: Roug fir/ Oil: r 9��7�s/ Final: I ✓� Final: Smoke: 3�y/aJ Treasury: THIS PE MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLA N O Y O ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001284 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 GwTMS®1998 Des.Lauriers&Associates,Inc. w OP-2002-0075 Building Permit No.: 518-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL - WAY in the CITY OF SALEM ---------------- ------------------------ ------- Address Town/Cily Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 8 Reliance Row Occupancy for Sales &Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires Thursday Apr 4,-2002 unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date ---------------- Issued On: Mon Mar 4,2002 ----------- L j GeoTMS®2002 Des Lauriers Municipal solutions,Inc. ---------------------------------------------- �- -C•( 0000 RELIANCE ROW 518-2000 GIs;,. 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map 21, -,'Block:. CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0242 .: ecmit _ Building T 7 Category: 102 New Single famil; $v ILDING PERMIT Permit# ' '. ' 51872000, , Project#,'' JS-20011159 Est.Cost: _, $0.00 Fee-- "`sr $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: `>.. ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq. ftt): 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning:' ' 3,-r Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained: Units Lost: - AT. 0000 RELIANCE ROW ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK. E '� 8 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#1 Ca` yOy PerF1111. occupy py Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: /—,? Meter: Footings: Z RonRough:/._j_�jHouse# Foundation: Final: me-©k a 5/Ask, j Fireplace/Chimney: 43'as a epartment Board of Health Insulation: on h: Oil: - 9/��e/ Final:©lC Final: Smoke: 31011u, Treasury: THIS PE MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLA N O NY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001283 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. } OP-2002-0080 Building Permit No.: 493--2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM ---------- ---------- - ---- m ress Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 12 Reliance Row Occupancy for Sales &Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires Thursday Apr 4,2002 unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date ----------------------------------- --------------------------------- Issued On: Mon Mar 4,2002 --------`------------------------------------------------------------------ y ------- -------- - - ----------- - - - -- ----------- GeoTMS®2002 Des Launers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------ ------------------ eta 3���oe� Q006 RELIANCE ROW ASK' 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS vlap 21. CITY OF SALEM Lot 0242 Permit: -- Badding BUILDING PERMIT Category ,' = 102 New Single famil Permit# 521-2000, , Project# 7S-2001-1162" EstCost $0.00 Fee: "" $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 ot'Size(sq. ft:)-' 2$7496' Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning:; R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES Units Gained:,; AT: 0000 RELIANCE ROW Units Lost: ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: Uu1i for Permit to 01CCUpy 12 Reliance Row-Townhouse Type#2 Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs &fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings 's 1 Underground: Service: �-�-O/ Meter: Footings: R � Rough:�o i House# Foundation: q e w Roug rame: Final- Final: n vZ Firepl ce/Chimney: I Gas OV Fire Department Board of Health Insulation: ou Oil: Final 0// Gt/d Final: Smoke: Treasury: THIS PERM Y BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY O ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001286 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 Ge TMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. OP-2002-0074 Building Permit No.: 510-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAY in the CITY OF SALEM Atltlress TowNCity Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 123 Weatherly Drive Occupancy for Sales &Marketing use only This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires Thursday Apr 4,2002 unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On:Mon Mar 4,2002 --- --------_--__-- GeoTMS®2002 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. -----`- -- ---� + ' k1G----`-^-�J-- -- - - ---------------- WN,WEATHERLY DRIVE 510-2000 ls* 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 1 CITY OF SALEM `[nmclm: 0242 Buildin 2Ne BUILDING PERMIT 102 New Single Tamil tozaoo Stool-1151 ao 00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Contractor: License: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 .): 87496 Owner., Vinnin S uare LLC A licant. ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES AT: 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE Ints LA= ISSUED ON: 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON: 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK. 123 Weatherly Drive-Townhouse Type#2 ' Constmct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square.Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET actor of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings inderground: Service:- - Meter: Footings: C I I' S- C Rough: -o T°�'� House# Foundation: i✓� Final: .?-f a Rough Frame: Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Department Board of Health Insulation: RoughY'/,\// . 5'- n / /N"` Oil: plC Final: Smoke: asur): THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL ON O ANY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001275 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 Ce TMS®1998 Des l.auriets&Associates,Inc. 00.001WEATHERLY DRIVE 510-2000 cis#: ,;:,.. 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS M�k 21 CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0242 Pernut Building ' ' Category." IO2 New Single�famil BUILDING PERMIT Permit#" .510-2000 n. Project JS2001-1151 Est.Cost. $0.00 , ee. $o.00 " PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const. Class:"- Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor-Salem#2092 Lot'Size(sq.ft.): 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoiung:' R3 Applicant: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES nits Gained:' Units Lost: AT. 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON. 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: Fall for Permit f® OCCUPY 123 Weatherly Drive-Townhouse Type#2 Construct townhouse per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square.Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: /—d '�� Meter: Footings: Ron Rough:///2/0//_p� House# Foundation: i Final: / Rough me:e/C e/a116z &,�4 N%1c)) Fireplace/Chinmey: Gas Fire Department Board of Health Insulation: Rough: Oil: Final: Final: Smoke: Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL ONO ANY ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001275 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 GeoTMS®1998 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. I S + 1 ZADE COn', COMPANY O&rS Afo11:)Oinied lade Ph.U.,P.E. Consulting t.BOS1 1). McVILIf S.KoYfocn.P.F„ l40 6C':�Ch St.,60S(Un,MA 02111 (617)3i8 4406 h1UZdffCr?f UC1ChItZBGIC A15C..P.E. Fn,N 617 4:i 1 ;:540 5/2/00 Salem Fire Department Fire Prevention Division 29 Fort Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Mr. Frank Preczewski (Fire Inspector) Re: Vinnin Square Salem, MA Sub: Fire Alarm System Dear Frank: This is a follow up of our meeting on May 2, 2000 regarding the fire alarm and fire protection system for the above referenced project. The following items were discussed and agreed upon. 1. All buildings shall be sprinklered as per NFPA-13R , except TH #1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and garage buildings. 2. There will be separate sprinkler services for building #3 ,building #5, Six Plex # 113, and Six Plex #117. Siamese connections shall be 4" stortz type. 3. There will be a double check valve assembly, and a flow switch for each service. All valves shall have tamper switch. 4. Flow and tamper switches shall be alarm zone. 5. One addressable fire alarm control panel will be provided in entrance of Six-plex bldg#113 Weatherly Drive. B. Master box will be provided. 7. Knox box will be provided. � v 8. Exterior horn/strobe shall be provided to each building covered by sprinklers and programmed to activate only if respective building affected. 9. For two six-plex buildings fire alarm system will consist of manual fire alarm pull stations at exit doors, system type smoke detectors In common areas, system type heat detector in mechanical rooms and horn/strobes as required by NFPA. 10, System type heat detectors will be provided in separate garages, I 11. For units local type 120V smoke detectors will be provided inside and outside of each bedroom. 12. All local type 120V smoke detectors inside a unit will be tandem wired and will have battery back-up. 13. Units with sprinkler coverage will have mini horn. Mini horn will activate if respective building is affected. 14. No system type heat or smoke detectors will be provided inside unit, If there is any misunderstanding with the above or if you should require further ' or ation, please contact us. ery ruly yours, Mahendra Patel �� d " ovr .z t se oru At4"awuu 3arZ Lc,: t t wcIw CIO-s -s w * LVR CORPORATION PROJECT: VINAIN SQUARE rARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIERZ ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02/00 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VINNIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCA'T'ION: SA:LENl, MASS NAI4E OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL TH-2 ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT 4 DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 475 . 00 SQ.FT, MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ-FT, MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 120 . 00 SQ.FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA: TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12 , 1997 HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 , 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 . 00 PST_ CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 , 00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 45 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : MAKE: RELIABLE MODEL: Fl/RES/CCP SIZE: 3/8 K-FACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: r, PROJECT DATA. FILE NAME: VINNIN2 � ZN�F Mgs�cc CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR: 3 90 o l E RMUZFFFERHITZADE � 'TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES : 20 . 00 FRENo3sss2noN TOTAL, NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 4 . 00 9oT`c!STEPG�a`v SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI ) ; 7 . 20 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER: 300 . 00 ` **x* EIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRA14 BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********xxx********x*x PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH_ RES .PR. PIP.L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI ) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 2 3 . 90 38. 0 10 . 64 7 . 44 12. 0 1 . 109 10 .5 0 . 020 0 . 0 1 3 . 90 38 . 0 10 . 46 7 . 20 12 . 0 150 3 . 48 0 . 24 0. 08 4 3 . 90 38 . 0 11 . 10 8 . 10 12 . 0 1 . 109 10 . 9 0 . 021 0 . 0 3 3 . 90 38 . 0 10 . 92 7 . 85 12 . 0 150 3 . 62 0. 26 0 . 09 10 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 16 5 . 0 1 . 109 2.1 . 1 0 . 072 0 . 0 2 3 . 90 38. 0 10 . 64 7 . 44 ' - 10 . 0 150 6 . 99 0 .72 0 . 33 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 89 5 . 0 1 , 109 22 . 0 0 . 078 0 . 0 4 3 .90 38 . 0 11 . 10 8 . 10 ` 10 . 0 150 7 . 29 0 . 78 0 . 36 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 89; 10 . 0 1 . 109 21 . 1 0 . 072 0 . 0 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 8 . 16 10 . 0 150 6 . 99 0 . 72 0 .33 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 .00 12 . 68 7 . 0 1 . 109 43 . 0 0 . 271 0.0 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 8 . 89 14 . 0 150 14. 28 3 . 79 1 . 37 13 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 10 . 0 1 . 109 43 . 1 0 . 272 4 . 3 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 12 . 68 17 . 0 150 14. 32 4 . 62 1 . 38 14 0. 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 23 . 21 10 . 0 1 . 400 43 . 0 0 . 087 0 . 0 13 0 .00 28 . 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 18 . 0 150 8 .97 1 . 57 0 . 54 15 0 . 00 28. 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 1 .0 1 . 400 43 . 1 0 . 087 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 28. 0 0 . 00 23 . 21 9 . 0 150 6. 99 0 . 79 0 . 54 16 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 20 . 0 1 . 602 43 . 0 • 0 . 045 8 . 7 15 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 29 . 0 150 6 .85 1 .31 0 . 32 17 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 4 . 0 1 , 602 43 . 0 0 . 045 0 . 0 16 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 13 . 0 150 6 .85 0 . 59 0 . 32 18 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 4. 5 1 . 602 43 . 1 0 . 045 0 . 0 17 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 13 . 5 150 6 .87 0 . 61 0 . 32 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36. 46 65 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 0 . 0 18 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 80 . 0 120 3 . 78 1 .28 0 . 10 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 38. 80 5 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 2 . 2 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 46 11 . 0 120 3 . 78 0 . 18 0 . 10 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 . 75 0 . 0 0 . 000 44 . 5 0. 000 0 . 0 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 38 . 80 METER - 5 PSI AT 75 GPM 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 3 . 0 22 . 157 40.9 0 . 015 1 . 3 '101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 .75 9 . 0 120 3 . 59 0 . 13 0 .09 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 3 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES.PR PIP.L DIAM_ GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI ) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 28 100. 0 3 .850 44 . 1 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 .00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 139 . 9 140 1 . 22 0 . 11 0 . 01 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 45 . 29 200 . 0 7 .980 46 . 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 . 00 0. 0 0 . 00 45 . 28 223 . 9 14.0 0 .30 0 . 01 0 . 00 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 45 . 29' `200.0 11 .990 -141 . 9 0 . 000 0 . 0 300 0 . 00 0.0 -141 .88 45 . 30 235 . 9 140 -0.40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 7 . 20 10. 46 3 . 90 2 7 . 44 10 . 64 3 . 90 3 7 . 85 10 . 92 3 . 90 _ 4 8 . 10 11 . 10 3 . 90 HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 1 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 . 20 HD:D ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE:: 7 . 20 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 7 . 20 ) = 10 . 46 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 7 . 20 ) - 10 . 46 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 *********x************* FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** NETWORK SUMMARY; NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS : 4 INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 475. 000 SQ_FT_ DESIRED DENSITY: 0 . 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0 . 088 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER: 118 . 750 SQ.FT. • 4 SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM NON-SPRINKLER FLOW: 100 . 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 141 . 881 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 47 . 500 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 5 . 619 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 10 . 470 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: 1 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 45. 296 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 141 . 881 GPM MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY (IN PIPE 13-12) : 14 . 320 FPS MAX VELOCITY PRESSURE (IN PIPE 13-12) : 1 . 380 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 240 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 079 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 4 . 592 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 639 GPM COMMENTS : �* LVR CORPORATION X* PROJECT: VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIENT: ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02%00 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VINNIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL 6-PLEX ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT F DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 650 . 00 SQ.FT. MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ.FT. MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 279 . 00 Sp-FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA: TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12, 1997 HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 .PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 . 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 .00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 . 00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 52 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : MA-KE: RELIABLE MODEL: F1 /P'F.S/CCP SIZE; 3/8 K-FACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: PROJECT DATA FILE NAME: VINNIN CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR; 3 . 90 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES : 25 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 27 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 3 . 00 SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI ) : 12 . 90 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER: 300 .00 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 **************x******** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP .L DIAM, GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 . 40 9 . 0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 1 3 . 90 38 . 0 14. 02 12 . 93 14 . 0 150 4. 66 0 . 48 0 . 15 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 . 41 10 . 0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 2 3 . 90 38. 0 14. 01 12 . 90 15 . 0 150 4. 65 0 . 51 0 . 15 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 41 12 . 0 1 . 109 1 . 4 0 . 000 0 . 0 10 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 .40 .E 12 . 0 150 0 . 47 0 . 01 0 . 00 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 .00 13 . 53 3 . 0 1 . 109 15 . 4 0 . 041 0. 0 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 .00 13. 41': " 3 . 0 150 5 . 12 0. 12 0 . 18 12 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 53, 30 . 0 1 . 109 3 . 4 0 . 002 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 44 . 0 150 1 . 12 0 . 11 0 . 01 13 0 . 00 36 . 0 0 . 00 17 . 60 1 . 5 1 . 109 18 .8 0 . 058 0 . 0 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0. 00 13 . 53 69 . 5 150 6 . 24 4 .06 0 . 26 14 0 .00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 10.0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 3 3 . 90 38 . 0 14. 02 12. 91 15 .0 150 4. 66 0 . 51 0 . 15 15 0 .00 38. 0 0 . 00 15. 78 66. 0 1 . 109 12. 6 0 . 028 0 .0 10 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13. 40 85 . 0 150 4. 19 2 .38 0 . 12 15 0 . 00 .38. 0 0. 00 15 . 78 87 . 0 1 . 109 10 .7 0 . 020 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 115 . 0 150 3 . 54 2. 36 0 . 08 16 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 16 . 52 1 . 5 1 . 109 23 . 3 , 0. 087 0. 0 15 0 . 00 38.0 0 . 00 15 . 78 8 . 5 150 7 . 73 0 . 74 0 . 40 20 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 30 . 0 1 .400 18 . 8 0 . 019 12 . 1 13 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 17 . 60 38 . 0 150 3 . 91 0. 71 0 . 10 21 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 29 . 71 30 . 0 1 . 400 23 . 3 0 . 028 12 . 1 16 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 16 . 52 38 . 0 150 4. 85 1 . 06 0 . 16 22 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 1 . 0 1 . 109 18 . 6 0 . 058 0 . 0 20 0. 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 6 . 0 150 6 . 24 0 . 35 0 . 26 23 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 23 1 . 0 1 . 109 23 . 3 0 . 087 0 . 0 21 0 . 00 10. 0 0 . 00 29 . 71 6 . 0 150 7 . 73 0 . 52 0 . 40 24 0. 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 34 4 . 5 1 .109 18 . 8 0 .0.58 0 .0 22 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 .78 9 . 5 150 6 . 24 0 . 56 0 . 26 24 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 34 100 . 0 1 .109 3 . 0 0 . 002 0 .0 25 0 . 00 10. 0 0. 00 31 . 05 142.. 0 150 1 . 01 0 . 28 0 . 01 *'�** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOF'T'WARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/021/00 *********************** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA PAGE 3 ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP ,L DIAM, GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOTAL C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 25 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 4. 5 1 . 109 23 . 3 0 . 087 0 . 0 23 0 . 00 10 . 0 0. 00 30 . 23 9 . 5 150 7 . 73 0 .83 0 , 40 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36. 89 39 . 0 1 . 109 21 .8 0 . 077 0 . 0 24 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 .00 31 . 34 72 . 0 150 7 . 25 5 . 55 0 , 35 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36. 89 52 . 0 1 . 109 20 . 2 0 . 067 0. 0 25 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 '" 87 . 0 150 6 . 72 5 . 84 0 . 30 27 0. 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 . 57,. 4 . 0 1 , 109 42 . 0 0 . 260 0. 0 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 89 18 . 0 150 13 .97 4 . 67 1 . 31 28 0 . 00 3 . o 0 . 00 45 . 71= 67 . 0 2 . 157 42 , 0 0. 015 3 . 0 27 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 . 57 72 , 0 120 3 . 69 1 , 11 0 . 09 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 3 . 0 4 ,260 42 . 0 0 . 001 0. 0 28 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 .00 45 . 71 15 . 0 120 0 . 95 0 . 01 0 .01 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 50 . 69 0 . 0 0 .000 42 . 4 0 . 000 0 . 0 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 METER - 5 PSI AT 300 GPM 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 5 . 0 4.260 42 , 0 0, 001 1 , 3 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 50 . 69 17 . 0 120 0 .95 0 . 01 0 . 01 201 0 . 00 0. 0 0. 00 52 . 04 50. 0 3 .850 42 . 0 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 63.3 140 1 . 16 0 . 04 0 . 01 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 52 , 05 200 . 0 7 ,980 42 . 0 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 04 223 . 9 140 0 . 27 0 , 00 0 . 00 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 '100 . 00 52 . 05 200 . 0 11 .990 -142 . 1 0 . 000 0 , 0 300 0 . 00 0 . 0 -142 . 06 52 . 05 200 , 0 140 -0 ,40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 12 . 93 14 . 02 3 , 90 2 12 , 90 14 , 01 3 . 90 - 3 12 . 91 14 . 02 3 . 90 ` ` - **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION *x LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 . 90 HMD ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 , 90 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3.90 X SQ.RT( 12 . 90) 14 . 01 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 12.90 ) = 14. 01 NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS : 27 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS: 4 3 INSIDE HOSE STREAI4 ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 650 . 000 SQ.FT. DESIRED DENSITY: 0 . 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0 . 065 GPM/SQ-FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER: 216 . 667 SQ.FT. SPRINKLER FLOW: 42. 061 GPM NON--SPRINKLER FLOW: 100 . 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 142 -061 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 65 . 000 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 42 . 061 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 22 . 939 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 14 . 020 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: 2 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 52 . 052 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 142 . 061 GPM MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY ( IN PIPS; 27-26) : 13 . 965 FPS MAX VELOCITY. PRESSURE ( IN PIPE 27-26) : 1 . 313 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 085 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE* 0 . 017 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 .395 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 034 GPM COMMENTS : CItp of &alp Y, Iflam5arbuato gt" � QST Office of the Citp C-onncil Citp COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE- N JOAN B. LOVELY - ' ' ` ' WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT 2001 - 2001 LAURA DeTOMA - DEBORAH E.�BURKINSHAW + SCOTT A. LaCAVA THOMAS H. FUREY CITY CLERK REGINA R. FLYNN KEVIN R.HARVEY JOAN B. LOVELY ARTHUR C. SARGENT III LEONARD F. O'LEARY KIMBERLEY L. DRISCOLL SARAH M. HAYES JOSEPH A. O'KEEFE, SR. June 15, 2001 Mr. Scott D. Shaull, Vice-President Archstone Communities 49 Waltham Street LEXINGTON MA 02421 Re: Vinnin @ Vinnan Square 0 Carol Way (Ward Seven, Pct2) SALEM MA Earlier this week`I contacted you about complaints I have received from neighbors of the above:captioned development. I believe the consultant working for Archstone may already have resolved these issues. Construction activities, by Salem Ordinance, cannot commence ' before 08:00 a.m. without prior City Council approval, which has not been granted. The crushing of stone, by the rock crusher, is a quarry operation and cannot be conducted on Saturdays or Sundays. I believe the Salem Building Inspectors office has already corrected these tivities. espectfully, 4p . O'Keefe, Sr. C cillor Ward Seven 28 Surrey Road SALEM MA 01970-4365 Vinnin Square LLC 6 Eden Road Wayland MA 01778 508 269 6900 Fax 650 0526 May 4, 2000 Peter Strout By Hand Inspector of Buildings City of Salem One Salem Green Salem MA 01970 ������,, Re Permit Application filed May 2, 2000 for work at The Village It� kf in Square Dear Peter, Per the requirements of the above application attached you will find the Variances and Conservation decisions. To wit enclosed are ZBA Decisions, Minor Amendments to the Decisions and Amended Decisions. You will also find Conservation Commission Order of Conditions,Amended Order of Conditions, DEP Superceding Order of Conditions and an Insignificant Amendment to the Superceding Order of Conditions. Attached you will also find a Certificate of Insurance. The certificate reflects General Liability. As we will be contracting all work and the partnership has no employees—we have no need for worker's compensation coverage. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Zegard , ZADE ZADF,COMPANY INC. Cunsulting Englneers M01W)mmed Zade Ph.D.,P.F. 140 BeaCh St..BOSton,MA 021 it %levlut S.KOy'lcn,P.F. (617)338.4406 Nfu2affer;lfuCtCllltZadc A1.Sc'..P.E. Flt 6174 S 11540 5/2/00 Salem Fire Department Fire Prevention Division 29 Fort Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Mr, Frank Preczewski (Fire Inspector) Re: Vinnin Square Salem, MA Sub: Fire Alarm System Dear Frank: ` This is a follow up of our meeting on May 2, 2000 regarding the fire alarm and fire protection system for the above referenced project. The following items were discussed and agreed upon. 1. All buildings shall be sprinklered as per NFPA-13R , except TH V. 3, 5, 7, 9 and garage buildings. 2. There will be separate sprinkler services for building #3 ,building #5, Six Plex # 113, and Six Plex #117. Siamese connections shall be 4" stortz type. 3. There will be a double check valve assembly, and a flow switch for each service., All valves shall have tamper switch. 4. Flow and tamper switches shall be alarm zone. 5. One addressable fire alarm control panel will be provided in entrance of Six-plex bldg#113 Weatherly Drive. 6, Master box will be provided. 7. Knox box will be provided. B. Exterior horn/strobe shall be provided to each building covered by r sprinklers and programmed to activate only if respective building affected. 9. For two six-plex buildings fire alarm system will consist of manual fire alarm pull stations at exit doors, system type smoke detectors In common areas, system type heat detector in mechanical rooms and horn/strobes as required by NFPA. 10, System type heat detectors will be provided in separate garages, 11. For units local type 120V smoke detectors will be provided inside and outside of each bedroom. 12. All local type 120V smoke detectors inside a unit will be tandem wired and will have battery back-up. 13. Units with sprinkler coverage will have mini horn. Mini horn will activate if respective building Is affected. 14. No system type heat or smoke detectors will be provided inside unit, If there is any misunderstanding with the above or if you should require further ' or ation, please contact us, ery ruly yours, Mahendra Patel su a VlbZ1oC _;+t .k.rroewoD 3;ItZ -LO: tt NOW C'0-8 -.a�w r ** LVR CORPORATION X* PROJECT: VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIENT: ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02/00 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: ' GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VIt1NIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL TH-2 ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT 4 DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 47.5 . 00 SQ,FT. MINIMUM DENSITY: 0. 10 GPM/SQ.FT, MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 120 . 00 SQ.FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: - 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA; TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12 , 1997 HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 . 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 . 00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 .00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 45 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : MAKE: RELIABLE MODEL: F1 /RES/CCP SIZE: 3418 K—FACTCR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: rj PROJECT DATA FILE NAME: VINNIN2 ��tNOF0,% CALCULATION MODE: DEMANDMILIFER DEFAULT SPRINKLER K—FACTOR: 3 . 90 o MUCTEHTZ DE n TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES : 20 . 00 v FIREno.PPROTECTION 39362 n TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 4 . 00 9C., C STEL G� SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 1 . 00 a� HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI) : 7 . 20 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER: 300 . 00 ` *"** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAI4 BY ELITE SOFTWARE' DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VIN14IN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP.L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 2 3 .90 38. 0 10 . 64 7 . 44 12. 0 1 . 109 10.5 0 . 020 0. 0 1 3 .90 38. 0 10 . 46 7 . 20 12 . 0 150 3 . 48 0. 24 0. 08 4 3 .90 38 . 0 11 . 10 8. 10 1.2 . 0 1 . 109 10.9 0 . 021 0.0 3 3 .90 38. 0 10 . 92 7 . 85 12. 0 150 3 . 62 0. 26 0 . 09 10 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 16 5. 0 1 . 109 21 . 1 0 . 072 0.0 2 3 .90 38.0 10 . 64 7 . 44• ' 10 . 0 150 6. 99 0.72 0 .33 11 0. 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8. 89 5 . 0 1 , 109 22 . 0 0. 078 0. 0 4 3.90 38. 0 11 . 10 8. 10 ` 10 . 0 150 7. 29 0 . 78 0 . 36 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 89: 10. 0 1 . 109 21 . 1 0 . 072 0. 0 10 0 .00 38. 0 0. 00 8 . 16 10 . 0 150 6. 99 0 . 72 0.33 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0.00 12 . 68 7 . 0 1 . 109 43 . 0 0 . 271 0.0 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8. 89 14 . 0 150 14 . 28 3 . 79 1 . 37 13 0.00 28. 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 10. 0 1 . 109 43 . 1 0 . 272 4.3 12 0.00 38. 0 0 . 00 12 . 68 17. 0 150 14. 32 4 . 62 1 .38 14 0. 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 23 . 21 10 . 0 1 .400 43. 0 0. 087 0. 0 13 0.00 28. 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 18 . 0 150 8 . 97 1 . 57 0 .54 15 0 . 00 28. 0 0. 00 24. 00 1 . 0 1 . 400 43 . 1 0 . 087 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 28.0 0 .00 23 . 21 9 . 0 150 8.99 0 . 79 0 .54 16 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 20 . 0 1 . 602 43 . 0 • 0 . 045 8.7 15 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 29 . 0 1S0 6. 85 1 .31 0. 32 17 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 4 . 0 1 , 602 43 . 0 0 . 045 0. 0 16 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 13 . 0 150 6. 85 0 . 59 0 .32 18 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 4. 5 1. 602 43 . 1 0. 045 0. 0 17 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 13 . 5 150 6 . 67 0 . 61 0 . 32 19 0 .00 8. 0 0 . 00 36. 46 65 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0. 016 0 . 0 18 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 80 . 0 120 3 . 78 1 . 28 0. 10 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 38. 80 5 . 0 2. 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 2 . 2 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36. 46 11 . 0 120 3 . 78 0 . 18 0 . 10 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0. 00 43. 75 0 . 0 0 . 000 44. 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 100 0. 00 3 .0 0. 00 38. 80 METER - 5 PSI AT 75 GPM 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 3 . 0 2. 157 40 . 9 0 . 015 1 . 3 '101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 . 75 9 . 0 120 3 . 59 0 . 13 0 . 09 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 3 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES.PR PIP.L DIA-M. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 201 0 .00 0. 0 0 . 00 45. 28 100. 0 3.850 44. 1 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 139.9 140 1 . 22 0 . 11 0 . 01 202 0. 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 45 . 29 200 . 0 7 .980 46 . 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 .00 0. 0 0 . 00 45.28 223 . 9 140 0 . 30 0 . 01 0. 00 202 0.00 0. 0 100 . 00 45 . 29' •'200. 0 11 .990 -141 . 9 0. 000 0 . 0 300 0 .00 0. 0 -141 .88 45 . 30 235. 9 140 -0 .40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 7 . 20 10. 46 3 . 90 2 7 .44 10 . 64 3 . 90 3 7 . 85 10 . 92 3 . 90 4 8. 10 11 . 10 3 . 90 HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 1 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 .20 P-MD ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 . 20 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3 .90 X SQ.RT( 7 .20) = 10 . 46 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3. 90 X SQ.RT( 7 .20) - 10 . 46 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS: 19 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS : 4 INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 475. 000 SQ.FT. DESIRED DENSITY: 0. 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0. 088 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER„ 118 . 750 SQ.FT. SPRINKLER FLOW: 4 41 . 861 GPM NON-SPRINKLER FLOW: 100. 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 141 - 881 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 47 . 500 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 5. 619 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 10. 470 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: 1 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 45. 296 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 141 .881 GPM MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY (IN PIPE 13-12) : 14 . 320 FPS MAX VELOCITY PRESSURE (IN PIPE 13-12) : 1 . 380 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE. 0. 240 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE. NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 079 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 4 . 592 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 639 GPM COMMENTS : ** LVR CORPORATION X* PROJECT: VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIENT: ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02/.00 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VINA'IN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL 6-PLEX ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 650 . 00 SQ.FT. MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ.FT. MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 279. 00 SQ_FT, INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA: TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12, 1997 HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 .PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 ,00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 .00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142.00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 52.00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS: Tu+T�E= RELIABLE MODEL: F1 /RF.S/CCP ILE: 3/8 K-FACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: PROJECT DATA FILE NAME: VINNIN CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR: 3 . 90 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES: 25 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 27 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 3 . 00 SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI ) : 12.90 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER.: 300 . 00 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 *********************** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ******************x*** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP.L DIAM, GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 10 0.00 38. 0 0. 00 13 . 40 9. 0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0. 034 0 . 0 1 3 .90 38. 0 14. 02 12, 93 14. 0 150 4. 66 0 . 48 0. 15 11 0. 00 38. 0 0. 00 13 . 41 10 , 0 1 .109 14 , 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 2 3 . 90 38. 0 14. 01 12 . 90 15 . 0 150 4. 65 0.51 0 . 15 11 0. 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13.41 12 . 0 1 . 109 1 . 4 0 . 000 0 . 0 10 0. 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 . 40 ,4 12. 0 150 0. 47 0. 01 0. 00 12 0. 00 38. 0 0 .00 13. 53 3 . 0 1 , 109 15 . 4 0 . 041 0. 0 ll 0.00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 41 ; 3. 0 150 5 . 12 0. 12 0 .18 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 53, 30 . 0 1 .109 3 . 4 0 . 002 0 . 0 14 0 .00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43' 44 . 0 150 1 . 12 0 . 11 0.01 13 0. 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 17. 60 1 .5 1 , 109 18.8 0. 058 0 . 0 12 0.00 38. 0 0.00 13. 53 69 . 5 15p 6. 24 4.06 0.26 14 0.00 36. 0 0. 00 13 . 43 10. 0 1 ,109 14. 0 0. 034 0. 0 3 3 .90 38. 0 14. 02 12. 91 15 . 0 150 4. 66 0. 51 0.15 15 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 15. 78 66. 0 1 . 109 12. 6 0 . 028 0.0 10 0.00 3B. 0 0.00 13. 40 85 . 0 150 4. 19 2.38 0 . 12 15 0.00 38. 0 0.00 15 .78 87 . 0 1 . 109 10 .7 0 . 020 0 . 0 14 0.00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 115 . 0 150 3 .54 2.36 0 . 08 16 0. 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 16 . 52 1 .5 1 . 109 23 . 3 , 0. 087 0.0 15 0.00 38 .0 0. 00 15 . 78 8. 5 150 7. 73 0.74 0 . 40 20 0. 00 10. 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 30 . 0 1 ,400 18 . 8 0 . 019 12. 1 13 0 . 00 3B. 0 0 . 00 17 . 60 38 . 0 150 3 . 91 0. 71 0 . 10 21 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 29 . 71 30 . 0 1 .400 23.. 3 0. 028 12. 1 16 0. 00 38. 0 0 . 00 16. 52 38 . 0 150 4. 85 1 . 06 0 . 16 22 0. 00 10, 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 1 . 0 1 . 109 18 . 8 0 . 058 0 . 0 20 0.00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 6 . 0 150 6. 24 0 . 35 0 .26 23 0. 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 23 1 . 0 1 . 109 23 .3 0 . 087 0. 0 21 0. 00 10. 0 0 .00 29 . 71 6, 0 150 7 .73 0 .52 0 . 40 24 0 .00 10. 0 0 . 00 31 . 34 4 . 5 1 .109 18. 8 0 . 058 0.0 22 0. 00 10. 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 9. 5 150 6. 24 0 . 56 0 . 26 24 0. 00 10 . 0 0 , 00 31 . 34 100 . 0 1 .109 3 . 0 0. 002 0. 0 25 0. 00 10 . 0 0. 00 31 , 05 142 . 0 150 1 . 01 0. 28 0 . 01 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** VINNIN SQUARELYNNFIELD, MA 01940 *********************** 05/02;00 PAGE 3 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP.L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 25 0 .00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 4. 5 1 .109 23 . 3 0 . 087 p , p 23 0. 00 10. 0 0 . 00 30 . 23 9 . 5 150 7. 73 0 .83 0 . 40 26 0. 00 10. 0 0 . 00 36 . 89 39 . 0 1 . 109 21 .8 0 . 077 0. 0 24 0. 00 10 . 0 0. 00 31 . 34 72. 0 150 7 . 25 5. 55 0 .35 26 0 , 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36.89 52. 0 1 . 109 20 , 2 0. 067 0.0 25 0 .00 10 . 0 0. 00 31 . 05` 87 . 0 150 6. 72 5 .84 0 . 30 27 0. 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 .57,• _ 26 0.00 10 . 0 0 . 00 4 .0 1 , 109 42. 0 0 . 260 0. 0 36 . 89 18 . 0 150 13 .97 4. 67 1 . 31 28 0 . 00 3. 0 0 . 00 45 . 711 67 . 0 2 .157 42. 0 0. 015 3 . 0 27 0. 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 .57 72 . 0 120 3 . 69 1 . 11 0.09 100 0. 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 3. 0 4.260 42 . 0 0. 001 0. 0 28 0. 00 3 . 0 0 .00 45 . 71 15. 0 120 0 . 95 0. 01 0.01 101 0 .00 3 . 0 0 . 00 50 . 69 0 . 0 0 .000 42 . 4 0. 000 0 . 0 100 0. 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 METER - 5 PSI AT 300 GPM 200 0. 00 0. 0 0 . 00 52. 00 5 . 0 4.260 42 . 0 0. 001 1 , 3 101 0.00 3 . 0 0. 00 50 . 69 17. 0 120 0 .95 0. 01 0 . 01 201 0 .00 0. 0 0. 00 52 . 04 50. 0 3 .850 42 . 0 0 .001 0 . 0 200 0. 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 63.3 140 1 . 16 0. 04 0. 01 202 0.00 0 . 0 100 . 00 52 .05 200. 0 7.980 42 . 0 0 . 000 0. 0 201 0 .00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 04 223 . 9 140 0 . 27 0 . 00 0 . 00 202 0. 00 0. 0 100 . 00 52 . 05 200 . 0 11 .990 -142 . 1 0 . 000 0. 0 300 0. 00 0. 0 -142 . 06 52 .05 200 . 0 140 -0 . 40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: =LOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 12 . 93 14 .02 3 . 90 2 12 .90 14 , p1 3 . 90 3 12. 91 14 . 02 3 . 90 PAPP FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC PAPP ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 FIRE SPRINKLEP, OUTPUT DATA *i **E**fFG**ycx* *PAGEE4 HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12.90 HMD ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 .90 r%MD REQUIRED GPM = 3. 90 X SQ.RT(12 .90) < 14 . 01 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3.90 X 89.RT( 12. 90) 14. 01 NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS: 27 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS: 3 INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0. 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 650 .000 SQ.FT. DESIRED DENSITY: 0. 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0 . 065 GPM/SQ-FT. ACTUAL, AREA PER SPRINKLER: 216.667 SQ.FT. SPRINKLER FLOW: 42.061 GPM !ION—SPRINKLER FLOW: 100. 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 142 -061 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 65 . 000 GPM 'CTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 42 . 061 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 22. 939 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 14 . 020 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: 2 ESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 52. 052 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 142. 061 GPM :AXIMUD9 FLOW VELOCITY (IN PIPE 27_26) : 13 . 965FPS AX VELOCITY PRESSURE (IN PIPE 27-26) : 1 . 313 PSI 'ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0. 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 085 PSI .;CTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0. 017 PSI iCTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0.395 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 034 GPM "OMMEN TS : ** LVR CORPORATION X* PROJECT: VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING .ENGINEERING CLIENT: ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02/00 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM, DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VIN'NIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VIINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL TH-2 ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 475 . 00 SQ.FT. MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ-FT. MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 120 . 00 SQ .FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM_ WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA: TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12 , 1997 HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT . STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 . 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 . 00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 . 00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 45 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : : AKE: RELIABLE MODEL : F1 /RES/CCP SIZE: 3;8 K-FACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F p.. MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: iNOFMye �Oti. PROJECT DATA FILE NAME: VYNNIN2 M CZAFFEEROE a"-�l CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND $ FIREPROTECTION DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR: 3 . 90 No.39382 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES: 20 . 00 Ao9�C/S7EP�0 i TOTAL. NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 . 00 Fs�/ISTD- TOTAL" NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 4 . 00r SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 1 . 00 r, HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI ) : 7 . 20 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER: 300 . 00 *xx* FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION *X LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 **x************x******* FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA *****x*Wxx*********x** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH_ RES .PR PIP.L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI ) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 2 3 . 90 38 . 0 10 . 64 7 . 44 12. 0 1 . 109 10 . 5 0 . 020 0 .0 1 3 . 90 38. 0 10 . 46 7 . 20 12. 0 150 3 . 48 0 . 24 0 . 08 4 3 . 90 38 . 0 11 . 10 8 . 10 12 . 0 1 . 109 10 . 9 0 . 021 0 .0 3 3 . 90 38 . 0 . 10 . 92 7 . 85 12 . 0 150 3 . 62 0 . 26 0 . 09 10 0 . 00 38.0 0 . 00 8 . 16 5. 0 1 . 109 2.1 . 1 0 . 072 0.0 2 3 .90 38 . 0 10 . 64 7 . 44. "10 . 0 150 6 . 99 0 . 72 0 . 33 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 8. 89 5. 0 11109 22 . 0 0 . 078 0 . 0 4 3 .90 38. 0 11 . 10 8 . 10 ` 10 . 0 150 7 . 29 0 . 78 0 . 36 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 89, 10 . 0 1 . 109 21 . 1 0 . 072 0. 0 10 0 .00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 16 10 .0 150 6 . 99 0 . 72 0 . 33 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 12 . 68 7 .0 1 . 109 43 . 0 0 . 271 0 . 0 11 0 .00 38 . 0 0 . 00 8 . 89 14. 0 150 14 . 28 3 . 79 1 .37 13 0 .00 28 . 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 10 . 0 1 . 109 43 . 1 0 . 272 4 . 3 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 12 . 68 17 . 0 150 14. 32 4 . 62 1 .38 14 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 23 . 21 10 . 0 1 . 400 43 . 0 0 . 087 0 . 0 13 0 .00 28 . 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 18. 0 150 8.97 1 . 57 0 . 54 15 0 . 00 26. 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 1 . 0 1 . 400 43 . 1 0 . 087 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 28. 0 0 . 00 23 . 21 9 . 0 150 8 . 99 0 .79 0 . 54 16 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 20 . 0 1 . 602 43 . 0 , 0 . 045 8 . 7 15 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 29 . 0 150 6 . 85 1 . 31 0 . 32 17 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 4 . 0 1 , 602 43 . 0 0 . 045 0 . 0 16 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 13 . 0 150 6 . 85 0 . 59 0 .32 1s 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 4. 5 1 . 602 43 . 1 0 . 045 0 . 0 17 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 13 . 5 150 6 . 87 0 . 61 0 . 32 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36. 46 65 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 0 . 0 18 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 80 . 0 120 3 . 78 1 . 28 0 . 10 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 38 . 80 5 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 2 .2 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 46 11 . 0 120 3 . 78 0 . 18 0 . 10 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 . 75 0 .0 0. 000 44 . 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 100 0. 00 3 - 0 0 . 00 38 . 80 METER - 5 PSI AT 75 GPM 200 0 . 00 0 .0 0 . 00 45 . 18 3 . 0 2 . 157 40 . 9 0 . 015 1 . 3 '101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 . 75 9 . 0 120 3 . 59 0 . 13 0 .09 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 3 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES.PP. PIP.L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 201 0 .00 0. 0 0 . 00 45 . 28 100 . 0 3.850 44 . 1 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 .00 0. 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 139 . 9 140 1 . 22 0 . 11 0 . 01 202 0. 00 0. 0 100 . 00 45 . 29 200 . 0 7 .980 46 . 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 . 00 0. 0 0 . 00 45 . 28 223. 9 14.0 0 . 30 0 .01 0 . 00 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 45 . 29' '�200. 0 11 .990 -141 . 9 0 . 000 0 . 0 300 0 . 00 0. 0 -141 . 88 45 . 30 235 . 9 140 -0.40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 7 . 20 10 . 46 3 . 90 2 7 .44 10 . 64 3 . 90 3 7 . 85 10 . 92 3 . 90 4 8 . 10 11 . 10 3 . 90 HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 1 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 . 20 P-MO ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 . 20 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 7 . 20 ) = 10 - 46 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 7 . 20 ) - 10 . 46 **x* FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA x************ x******* NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS: 4 INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 475 . 000 SQ.FT. DESIRED DENSITY: 0 . 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0 . 088 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER: 118 . 750 SQ.FT. SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM NON-SPRINKLER FLOW: 100 . 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 141 . 881 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 47 . 500 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 5 . 619 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 10 . 470 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: 1 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 45 . 296 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 141 . 881 GPM MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY (IN PIPE 13-12) : 14 . 320 FPS MAX VELOCITY PRESSURE (IN PIPE 13-12) : 1 . 380 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 240 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 079 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 4 . 592 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 839 GPM COMMENDS : ** LVR CORPORATION ** PROJECT• VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIENT: ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02%00 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VINNIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL 6-PLEX ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT A DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 650 . 00 SQ.FT. MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ.FT. MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 279 . 00 SQ-FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA: TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12, 1997 IiYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 . 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 . 00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 . 00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 52 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : MAKE: RELIABLE MODEL: Fl /RES/CCP SIZE: 3/8 K-FACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: PROJECT DATA FILE NAME: VINNIN CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR: 3 . 90 . TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES : 25 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 27 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 3 . 00 SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI ) : 12.90 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER: 300 . 00 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFZELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 *********************** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP ,L DIAM, GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 , 40 9 . 0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 1 3 . 90 38 . 0 14 . 02 12 . 93 14 . 0 150 4. 66 0. 48 0 . 15 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 .41 10 . 0 1 .109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 2 3 . 90 38. 0 14 . 01 12 . 90 15 . 0 150 4. 65 0 . 51 0 . 15 11 0. 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 41 12 . 0 1 . 109 1 , 4 0 . 000 0 . 0 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 40 , 12 . 0 150 0 . 47 0. 01 0 . 00 12 0. 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13. 53 3 . 0 1 . 109 15 . 4 0 . 041 0. 0 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0. 00 13 . 41',' ` 3 . 0 150 5 . 12 0 . 12 0 . 18 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 53, 30 . 0 1 . 109 3 . 4 0 . 002 0. 0 14 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 44. 0 150 1 . 12 0 . 11 0 . 01 13 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 17 . 60 1 . 5 1 , 109 18 .8 0 . 058 0 . 0 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 .00 13. 53 69 . 5 150 6 . 24 4. 06 0 .26 14 0 .00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 10 . 0 1 .109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 3 3 . 90 38 . 0 14 . 02 12 . 91 15 . 0 150 4 . 66 0 . 51 0 . 15 15 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 15 . 78 66.0 1 . 109 12. 6 0 . 028 0 . 0 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 . 40 85 . 0 150 4. 19 2. 38 0 . 12 15 0 . 00 38. 0 0 .00 15 .78 87 . 0 1 . 109 10 . 7 0 . 020 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 115 . 0 150 3 . 54 2 . 36 0 . 08 16 . 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 16 . 52 1 . 5 1 . 109 23 . 3 , 0 . 087 0 . 0 15 0 .00 38 . 0 0 . 00 15 . 78 8 . 5 150 7 . 73 0 . 74 0 . 40 20 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 .00 30 . 43 30 . 0 1 .400 18 . 8 0 . 019 12 . 1 13 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 17 . 60 38 . 0 150 3 . 91 0 . 71 0 . 10 21 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 29 . 71 30 . 0 1 . 400 23 . 3 0 . 028 12 . 1 16 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 16 . 52 38 . 0 150 4, 85 1 . 06 0 . 16 22 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 1 . 0 1 . 109 18 . 8 0 . 058 0 . 0 20 0 .00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 6 . 0 150 6 . 24 0 . 35 0 . 26 23 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 23 1 . 0 1 . 109 23 . 3 0 . 087 0 .0 21 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 .00 29 . 71 6 . 0 150 7 . 73 0 . 52 0 . 40 24 0 . 00 10. 0 0 . 00 31 . 34 4 . 5 1 .109 18 . 8 0 . 058 0.0 22 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 9 . 5 150 6 . 24 0 .56 0 . 26 24 0 .00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 34 100 . 0 1 .109 3 . 0 0. 002 0.0 25 0 . 00 10 .0 0 . 00 31 . 05 142 . 0 150 1 . 01 0 . 28. 0 . 01 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM SY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIET,D, 14A 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02,00 *********************** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT BATA PAGE 3 *************x**xx*** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP .L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 25 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 4. 5 1 .109 23 . 3 0 . 087 0 . 0 23 0 . 00 10 . 0 0. 00 30 . 23 9 . 5 150 7 . 73 0 . 83 0 . 40 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 89 39 . 0 1 . 109 21 .8 0 . 077 0 . 0 24 0 . 00 10 . 0 0. 00 31 . 34 72 . 0 150 7 . 25 5. 55 0 . 35 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 89 52 . 0 1 . 109 20 . 2 0 . 067 0. 0 5 25 0 . 00 10 . 0 0. 00 31 . 0 - 87 . 0 150 6 . 72 5 . 84 0 . 30 27 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 . 57,•, 4 . 0 1 .109 42. 0 0 . 260 0 _ 0 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 89 18 . 0 150 13 . 97 4 . 67 1 . 31 28 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 71° 67 . 0 2 . 157 42 . 0 0 . 015 3 . 0 27 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 . 57 72 . 0 120 3 . 69 1 . 11 0 . 09 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 3. 0 4 .260 42 . 0 0 . 001 0 . 0 28 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 .00 45 .71 15 . 0 120 0 . 95 0 . 01 0 .01 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 50 . 69 0 . 0 0 . 000 42 . 4 0. 000 0 . 0 100 0. 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 METER - 5 PSI AT 300 GPM 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 5 . 0 4.260 42 . 0 0 . 001 1 . 3 101 0 .00 3 . 0 0. 00 50 . 69 17 - 0 120 0 . 95 0 . 01 0 . 01 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 04 50 . 0 3 .850 42 - 0 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 63 .3 140 1 . 16 0 . 04 0 . 01 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 52. 05 200 . 0 7 .980 42 . 0 ` 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 04 223 . 9 140 0 . 27 0 . 00 0 . 00 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 52 . 05 200 . 0 11 . 990 -142 . 1 0 . 000 0 . 0 300 0 . 00 0 . 0 -142 . 06 52 . 05 200 . 0 140 -0 . 40 0 . 01 0 .00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCF.ARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 12 . 93 14 . 02 3 . 90 2. 12 . 90 14,o1 3 .90 '�-----�-- 3 12 . 91 14 . 0 2 3 . 90 ---�- **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION *x LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 FIRE SPRINKLED, OUTPUT DATA *Y**xx**************** HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 . 90 HMD ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 . 90 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3 .90 X SQ.RT( 12 , 90) 14 . 01 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3. 90 X SQ.RT( 12.90 ) = 14. 01 NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS : 27 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS: 3 INSIDE HOSE STREAI4 ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 , 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 650 . 000 SQ.FT. DESIRED DENSITY: 0 . 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0 . 065 CPM/SQ-FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER: 216 . 667 SQ.FT, SPRINKLER FLOW: x2. 061 GPM NON-SPRINKLER FLOW; 100 . 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 142 -061 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 65 . 000 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 42 . 061 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 22 , 939 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 14 . 020 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED : 2 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 52 . 05.2 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 142 . 061 GPM 14AXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY (IN PIPE 27-26) : 13 . 965 FPS MAX VELOCITY PRESSURE ( IN PIPE 27-26) : 1 . 313 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 085 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0. 017 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 395 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 034 GPM COMMENTS : � a ** LVR CORPORATION X* PROJECT: VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIENT: ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02/00 FIRE SPRI14RLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VINNIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NFPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD! RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL TH-2 ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 475 . 00 SQ.FT, MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ"FT, MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 120 . 00 SQ.FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA; TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12 , 1997 HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 " 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 11167 . 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 . 00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 . 00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 45 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PSI SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : :^AKE: RELIABLE MODEL: F1 /RES/CCP SIZE: 3;8 K-FACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: � t -90FAU . PROJECT DATA. FILE NAME: VINNIN2 1AUZAFFER CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND o m TE141TZADPROT E DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR: 3 . 90 o FIR EW.3932TI0N y TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES : 20 . 00 °9fltG P���e TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 . 00 °�F sIe S EN TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 4 . 00 ZONAL SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 7 . 00 v HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI) ; 7 . 20 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER: 300 . 00 *** FIRE SPRINFLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWAREDEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 *****x**xx*********x*** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP .L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI ) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 2 3 .90 38 . 0 10 . 64 7 . 44 12. 0 1 . 109 10 . 5 0 . 020 0 . 0 1 3 . 90 38. 0 10 . 46 7 . 20 12. 0 150 3 . 48 0 . 24 0 . 08 4 3 . 90 38 . 0 11 . 10 8 . 10 12 . 0 1 . 109 10 . 9 0 . 021 0 . 0 3 3 . 90 38 . 0 10 . 92 7 . 85 12 . 0 150 3 . 62 0 . 26 0 . 09 10 0 . 00 38.0 0 . 00 8 . 16 5 . 0 1 . 109 2.1 . 1 0 . 072 0 . 0 2 3 .90 38 . 0 10 . 64 7 . 44• ' •• "10 . 0 150 6 . 99 0 . 72 0 .33 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 8 . 89 5 . 0 1 , 109 22 . 0 0 . 078 0 .0 4 3 .90 38. 0 11 . 10 8. 10 ` 10 . 0 150 7 . 29 0 . 78 0 . 36 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 89: 10 . 0 1 . 109 21 . 1 0 . 072 0 . 0 10 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8 . 16 10 .0 150 6 .99 0 . 72 0 .33 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 .00 12 . 68 7 . 0 1 . 109 43 . 0 0 . 271 0.0 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 8. 89 14 . 0 150 14 . 28 3 . 79 1 . 37 13 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 10. 0 1 . 109 43 . 1 0 . 272 4 .3 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 12 . 68 17 . 0 150 14 . 32 4 . 62 1 . 38 14 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 23 . 21 10 . 0 1 . 400 43 . 0 0. 087 0. 0 13 0 .00 26 . 0 0 . 00 21 . 64 18 . 0 150 8. 97 1 . 57 0 . 54 15 0 . 00 28. 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 1 . 0 1 . 400 43 . 1 0 . 087 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 28.0 0 . 00 23 .21 9 . 0 150 8 .99 0 . 79 0 . 54 16 0 . 00 8. 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 20 . 0 1 . 602 43 . 0 • 0 . 045 8 . 7 15 0 . 00 28 . 0 0 . 00 24 . 00 29 . 0 150 6 . 85 1 . 31 0 . 32 17 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 4 . 0 1 , 602 43 .0 0 . 045 0 . 0 16 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 33 . 97 13 . 0 150 6 . 85 0 . 59 0 .32 18 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 35 . 117 4 . 5 1 . 602 43 . 1 0 . 045 0 . 0 17 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 34 . 56 13 . 5 150 6 .87 0 . 61 0 . 32 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36. 46 65 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 0 . 0 18 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 35 . 17 80 . 0 120 3 . 78 1 . 28 0 . 10 100 0 - 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 38. 80 5 . 0 2 . 157 43 . 0 0 . 016 2 . 2 19 0 . 00 8 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 46 11 . 0 120 3 . 78 0 . 18 0 . 10 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 . 75 0 . 0 0 . 000 44 . 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 38 . 80 METER - 5 PSI AT 75 CPM 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 3 . 0 2 . 157 40. 9 0 . 015 1 . 3 '101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 43 . 75 9 . 0 120 3 . 59 0 . 13 0 .09 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 3 FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES.PR PIP.L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 28 100. 0 3 .850 44 . 1 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 18 139.9 140 1 . 22 0 . 11 0 . 01 202 0. 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 45. 29 200 . 0 7 .980 46 . 5 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 .00 0 . 0 0 . 00 45. 28 223 . 9 14.0 0 . 30 0 . 01 0 . 00 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 45 . 20 ''200. 0 11 .990 -141 . 9 0 . 000 0 . 0 300 0 . 00 0 .0 -141 .88 45 . 30 235. 9 140 -0 .40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. ( PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 7 . 20 10. 46 3 . 90 2 7 .44 10 . 64 3 . 90 3 7 . 85 10 . 92 3 . 90 4 8 . 10 11 . 10 3 . 90 HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 1 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 _20 HNID ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 7 . 20 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 7 . 20 ) = 10 . 46 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3. 90 X SQ.RT( 7 ,20 ) - 10 . 46 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 *********x****** r****** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS : 19 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS: .4 INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 475 . 000 SQ.FT_ DESIRED DENSITY: 0 . 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: 0 . 088 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER,: 118 . 750 SQ.FT. SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM - NON-SPRINKLER FLOW: 100 . 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 141 . 881 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 47 .500 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 41 . 881 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 5 . 619 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 10 . 470 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: 1 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 45 . 296 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 141 . 881 GPM MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY (IN PIPE 13-12) : 14 . 320 FPS MAX VELOCITY PRESSURE (IN PIPE 13-12) : 1 . 380 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 240 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 079 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 4 . 592 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 639 GPM COMMENT'S : ** LVR CORPORATION X* PROJECT• VINNIN SQUARE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CLIENT; ZADE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 DATE: 05/02400 FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM DESIGNER: GENERAL PROJECT DATA: BUILDING NAME: VINNIN SQUARE BUILDING LOCATION: SALEM, MASS NAME OF OWNER: VINNIN SQUARE, LLC CODE REFERENCE: NEPA-13R DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: TYPICAL 6-PLEX ATTIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET NAME OF APPROVING AGENCY: SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT DESIGN AREA OF WATER APPLICATION: 650 . 00 SQ.FT. MINIMUM DENSITY: 0 . 10 GPM/SQ.FT. MAXIMUM AREA PER SPRINKLER: 279. 00 SQ-FT. INSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 00 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 00 GPM WATER SUPPLY TEST DATA: TEST HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: 55 LORING STREET SOURCE OF INFORMATION: SALEM WATER DEPT. DATE OF TEST: MAY 12, 1997. HYDRANT ELEVATION: 0 . 00 FT. STATIC PRESSURE: 62 . 00 PSI TEST FLOW RATE: 1 , 167 . 00 GPM TEST RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 39 . 00 PSI CALCULATED FLOW RATE: 142 . 00 GPM CALCULATED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 52 . 00 PSI AVAILABLE RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 61 . 00 PST SPRINKLER SPECIFICATIONS : MADE: RELIABLE MODEL: F1 /RES/CCP SIZE: 3/8 K-_'ACTOR: 3 . 9 TEMPERATURE RATING: 155 F MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT DATA: PROJECT DATA FILE NAME: VINNIN CALCULATION MODE: DEMAND DEFAULT SPRINKLER K-FACTOR: 3 . 90 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE NODES : 25 . 00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE PIPE SECTIONS : 27 .00 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SPRINKLERS : 3 . 00 SPECIFIED HMD NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD MINIMUM RESIDUAL PRESSURE (PSI ) : 12 .90 SYSTEM INFLOW NODE NUMBER.: 300 . 00 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 2 **************x******** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA ********************** PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DISCH. RES .PR PIP .L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END K-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOTAL C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 40 9 . 0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 1 3 . 90 38 . 0 14 . 02 12 , 93 14 . 0 150 4. 66 0. 48 0 . 15 11 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 . 41 10 . 0 1 . 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 2 3 . 90 38. 0 14. 01 12 , 90 15 . 0 150 4. 65 0 .51 0 . 15 11 0 . 00 38 , 0 0 . 00 13 . 41 12 . 0 1 . 109 1 . 4 0 . 000 0 . 0 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 40 ,F 12 . 0 150 0 . 47 0. 01 0. 00 12 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 53 3. 0 1 . 109 15 . 4 0 . 041 0 . 0 11 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 13 . 41 : 3. 0 150 5 . 12 0 . 12 0 . 18 12 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 53; 30 . 0 1 . 109 3 . 4 0 . 002 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 44 . 0 180 1 , 12 ' 0 . 11 0 . 01 13 0. 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 17. 60 1 . 5 1 , 109 18 .8 0 . 058 0 . 0 12 0. 00 38. 0 0 .00 13 ,53 69 . 5 150 6 . 24 4 .06 0 .26 14 0 .00 36. 0 0 . 00 13 . 43 10 . 0 1 , 109 14 . 0 0 . 034 0 . 0 3 3 . 90 38 . 0 14. 02 12 .91 15 . 0 150 4 . 66 0. 51 0 . 15 15 0 . 00 38.0 0 . 00 15 . 78 66. 0 1 . 109 12. 6 0 . 028 0. 0 10 0 . 00 38 . 0 0 . 00 13 . 40 85. 0 150 4. 19 2 .38 0 . 12 15 0 . 00 38. 0 0 .00 15 . 78 87 . 0 1 . 109 10 . 7 0 . 020 0 . 0 14 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 13 . 4.3 115 . 0 150 3 . 54 2 , 36 0 . 08 16 0 . 00 38. 0 0 . 00 16. 52 1 . 5 1 , 109 23 . 3 ; 0 . 087 0 . 0 15 0 .00 38 . 0 0 . 00 15 . 78 8- 5 150 7 . 73 0 .74 0 . 40 20 0 . 00 10. 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 30 . 0 1 .400 18 . 8 0 . 019 .12 . 1 13 0 . 00 36.0 0 . 00 17 . 60 38 . 0 150 3 . 91 0 . 71 0 . 10 21 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 29 . 71 30 . 0 1 . 400 23 . 3 0 . 028 12 . 1 16 0 . 00 38 . 0 0. 00 16 . 52 38 . 0 150 4, 85 1 . 06 0 . 16 22 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 1 . 0 1 . 109 18 . 6 0 . 058 0 . 0 20 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 43 6 . 0 150 6 . 24 0 . 35 0 . 26 23 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 23 1 . 0 1 . 109 23 , 3 0 . 087 0.0 21 0 . 00 10. 0 0 . 00 29 . 71 6 . 0 150 7 .73 0 . 52 0 . 40 24 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 , 00 31 . 34 4 . 5 1 .109 18 . 8 0 . 058 0.0 22 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 30 . 78 9 . 5 150 6 , 24 0 . 56 0 . 26 24 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 34 100 . 0 1 . 109 3 . 0 0 . 002 0.0 25 0 . 00 10. 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 142 . 0 150 1 . 01 0 . 28 0 . 01 **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 *********************** FIRE SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA PAGE 3 * t*i ********x******* PIPE OUTPUT DATA: BEG NODAL ELEV DTSCH. RES . PR PIP,L DIAM. GPM FL/FT PE-PSI END X-FAC (FT) (GPM) (PSI) TOT.L C-VAL FPS FL-PSI PV-PSI 25 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 4. 5 1 . 109 23 . 3 0 . 087 0 . 0 23 0 . 00 10 . 0 0. 00 30 . 23 9 . 5 150 7 . 73 0 .83 0 .40 26 0 . 00 10. 0 0 . 00 36 .89 39 . 0 1 .109 21 . 8 0 . 077 0 . 0 24 0 . 00 10 . 0 0. 00 31 . 34 72 . 0 150 7 . 25 5 . 55 0 .35 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36 . 89 52 . 0 1 . 109 20 . 2 0 . 067 0.0 25 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 31 . 05 87 . 0 150 6 . 72 5 . 84 0 . 30 27 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 .57,- . 4 . 0 1 . 109 42 . 0 0 . 260 0. 0 26 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 36. 89` 18 . 0 150 13 .97 4. 67 1 . 31 28 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 71° 67 . 0 2 . 157 42 . 0 0 . 015 3 . 0 27 0 . 00 10 . 0 0 . 00 41 . 57 72 . 0 120 3 . 69 1 . 11 0 . 09 100 0. 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 3 . 0 4 .260 42 . 0 0 . 001 0. 0 28 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 71 15 . 0 120 0 .95 0 . 01 0 , 01 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 50 . 69 0 . 0 0 .000 42 . 4 0. 000 0 . 0 100 0 . 00 3 . 0 0 . 00 45 . 72 METER - 5 PSI AT 300 GPM 200 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 5 . 0 4.260 42 . 0 0 . 001 1 . 3 101 0 . 00 3 . 0 0. 00 50 . 69 17 . 0 120 0 . 95 0 . 01 0 . 01 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0. 00 52 . 04 50 . 0 3 .850 42 . 0 0 . 001 0 . 0 200 0 . 00 0. 0 0 . 00 52 . 00 63 .3 140 1 . 16 0. 04 0 . 01 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 52 . 05 200 . 0 7 .980 42 . 0 , 0 . 000 0 . 0 201 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 00 52 . 04 223 . 9 140 0 . 27 0 . 00 0 . 00 202 0 . 00 0 . 0 100 . 00 52 . 05 200 , 0 11 .990 -142 . 1 0 . 000 0 . 0 300 0. 00 0 . 0 -14.2 . 06 52 .05 200 . 0 140 -0 . 40 0 . 01 0 . 00 SPRINKLER OUTPUT DATA: FLOWING RESIDUAL SPRINKLER FLOWING NON-TYPICAL SPRINKLER PRESSURE DISCHARGE SPRINKLER SPRINKLER NODE NO. { PSI ) ( GPM ) (K FACTOR) DESCRIPTION 1 12 . 93 14 . 02 3 . 90 2 12 , 90 1 4. 0'I 3 . 90 �--�- 3 12 . 91 14 . 02 3 . 90 ----`. **** FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN PROGRAM BY ELITE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT INC **** ** LVR CORPORATION ** *,YNNFIELD, MA 01940 VINNIN SQUARE 05/02/00 PAGE 4 FIRE SPRINKLER, OUTPUT DATA ********************** HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING SPRINKLER CHECK: HMD SPRINKLER NODE NUMBER: 2 . 00 HMD REQUIRED RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 . 90 HMD ACTUAL RESIDUAL PRESSURE: 12 . 90 HMD REQUIRED GPM = 3 .90 X SQ.RT( 12 . 90) 14 . 01 HMD ACTUAL GPM = 3 . 90 X SQ.RT( 12.90) = 14. 01 NETWORK SUMMARY: NUMBER OF UNIQUE PIPE SECTIONS • 27 NUMBER OF FLOWING SPRINKLERS: 4 3 INSIDE HOSE STREPIQ ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM OUTSIDE HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE: 100 . 000 GPM IN RACK SPRINKLER ALLOWANCE: 0 . 000 GPM SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE: WET SPECIFIED AREA OF APPLICATION: 650 . 000 SQ.FT. DESIRED DENSITY: 0 . 100 GPM/SQ.FT. ACTUAL DENSITY: O . 065 GPM/SQ-FT. ACTUAL AREA PER SPRINKLER: 216 .667 SQ.FT. SPRINKLER FLOW: 42. 061 GPM NON-SPRINKLER FLOW; 100. 000 GPM TOTAL SYSTEM DEMAND FLOW: 142 061 GPM DESIRED SPRINKLER FLOW: 65 . 000 GPM ACTUAL SPRINKLER FLOW: 42 . 061 GPM ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER FLOW REQUIRED: 22 . 939 GPM AVERAGE SPRINKLER FLOW: 14 . 020 GPM APPROX. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS REQUIRED : 2 RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 52 . 05.2 PSI DEMAND FLOW AT SYSTEM INFLOW NODE: 142 . 061 GPM MAXIMUM FLOW VELOCITY ( IN PIPE 27-26) : 13 . 965 FPS MAX VELOCITY PRESSURE (IN PIPE 27-26) : 1 . 313 PSI ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0. 250 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 085 PSI ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL PRESSURE IMBALANCE: 0 . 017 PSI ACTUAL MAXIMUM NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 395 GPM ACTUAL AVERAGE NODAL FLOW IMBALANCE: 0 . 034 GPM COMMENTS : cP F: :: do. iia oe orovioed oy DEP) Form 5 City/Town 7,Ipm Applicant 'Jinnin Square L.L.0 Co=opwea1 r of Massachusetts arae°Pof ' Cbnaitions Massacnuetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L . c . 131, §40 From 2alem Conservation Commission issuing Authority Vinnin Sauare LLC c/o Steven Zieff same To (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) 01970 Address 0 Weatherly Dr. Salem, 2.1A address This order is issued and delivered as follows : SES 1 pv hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) .� by certified mail , return receipt requested on - (date). This project is located at Loring Ave, Weatherly Dr. , America Wav, & Carol Way The property is recorded at the Registry of Book 7250 Page 140 Certificate (if registered) The Notice of intent for this project was filed on Dec. 23, 1998 (date) The public hearing was closed on Feb. 26, 1998 (date) Findings The Commission has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of Intent and plans and has held a public hearing on the project. Based on the information available to the Cnmmi ccinn at this time, the ,�L ; ��; has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act (check as appropriate): Public water supply Flood Control LaM containing shellfish Private water supply Storm damage prevention Fisheries Graced water supply Prevention of pollution Protection of Wildlife Habitat Total Filing Fee Submitted 1300.00 State Share 637.50 (1/2 fee in excess of $25) 662.50 City/Town Share Total Refund Due S City/Town Portion S State Portion$ (1/2 total) (1/2 total) Effective 11/1_0/89 5-i Therefore, the Commission __eb;: __._s ac z.._ f..'_lcwirg conditions are necessary, in accordance with theYPerformance Standards set forth _n the regulations, tc. protect ^.ose interests checked above. The � ,et'�-- orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with sa conal ons and with the Notice of intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the pians, specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions scall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2 . The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3 . This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes, ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4 . The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply; (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5 . This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6 . Any ) ill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7 . No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. B . No work shall be undertaken until the Final order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, the Final order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording informatin shall be submitted to the Commission on the form at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, File Number 64-272 1. 10. where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to make a determination and to issue a Supersedina Order. the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department . 5-Z '_ort^with _e=ves- -_. --ac a =--'t_ _- Comp-1 _a.__ -sued stating tha: -.._ work ..as ccmcleced. 1:2 . The work s.-:al: _cn�cr __ _.._ '_.,_•:cwirc clans and special condit_„ns : Plans : Title Dated Signed and Stamped On File with: Caroi Wav Residential Dev. 12/19/97 Richard S . Hollworth Commission REVISED Carol i4av Residential Dev. 3/12/99 Richard Hollworth Commission Special Conditions (Use additional caner if necessary) SEE ATTACHED 7/22/99 Amended Plan dated 3/12/99 approved and special condition #16 paragraph 3 shall have word individual deleted twice. (Leave Space Blank) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . issued 1C.Mase r-:scion Commission Signature (s)���` �. Ai C _ U'l'✓� This�Order' must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. On this 26th day. of February 19 98 before me personally appeared the above mentioned to me known to be the person descriLed in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed th a e as his/her free act and deed. STEPHEN DIBBLE Nowry Public Myf7orrlrrlission Expires Nov.12,2004 Not p lic My commission expires The applicant, the owner, any person agrrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are " hereby notified of their right to request the Department of Environmental Protection to issue a Superseding Order, providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this determination. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. Detach on dotted lire and submit to the Commiggicin prior to commencement of work. ............................................................................................................ To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition B on ,19 if recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is Signature Applicant- 5-4;t pplicant-5-4:t SALE)I CONSERVATION COMMISSION SPECIAL CONDITIONS - DEP FILE rt64-277 Village at A'innin Square (Phase 4) Preamble: The Commission. pursuant to the Ri,.ers Protection Act, as a resuit of a review of the most recent t:SGS map (1935), a site visit, and all information presented including the Superseding Determination of applicability tiled on 8/3/93, and failing evidentiary contradicting support. has determined that the Rivers Protection Act does not apply to this Nxetland resource. 1. All work shall conform to the above-referenced Notice of Intent. site plan and supporting documents and those final specifications which shall be tiled with the Commission prior to construction. Any change made or intended to be made to the approved plans. whether or not requested b% another Department, shall require the applicant to inquire of the Commission in writing whether the change is substantial enough to require the tiling of a new Notice of Intent. 7. Members and agents of the Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises at all reasonable times to evaluate compliance with the conditions in this Order. The Commission may require the applicant to submit additional data or information necessary for the Commission to conduct that evaluation. 3. Upon completion of the project. the applicant shall submit, with the request for a Certification of Compliance. an affidavit, prepared by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, stating that the site has been developed in accordance with the requirements of this Order of Conditions, the referenced site plan and supporting documents. 4. This Order shall apply to every successor in control or successor in interest of the property described int he Notice of Intent and accompanying plans or part thereof. In the event this land or any part thereof changes ownership before or during construction, the current owner shall notify the new owner, by registered mail. of this Order prior to the transfer of ownership and shall forward proof of this notification to the Commission. 5. Prior to commencement of construction activity, a haybale barrier shall be placed downgradient of construction to prevent siltation of the adjacent wetland. Haybales shall be anchored with stakes and entrenched 4 to 6 inches in depth. Trench material shall be deposited on the upgradient side of the haybale barrier. Haybales shall be inspected daily; those showing signs of deterioration shall be replaced immediately. The haybale barrier shall remain in proper functioning condition until all disturbed areas have been stabilized. 6. Additional erosion and sedimentation control measures deemed necessary by the Commission shall be instituted by the applicant. Any siltation caused onto any %eetland or waterway area shall be promptly reported to the Commission. Such areas shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Commission. 7. During construction, no debris, fill, or excavated material shall be stockpiled within 100 feet of designated wetlands. Any other stockpile location will be protected sufficient to prevent sediment from surface runoff entering wetlands. 1 of 3 8. Granite or concrete curbing shall be installed around the parking lot perimeter to contain and direct the flow of .vater to catch basins. 9. The Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Salem Engineer with any changes noted and submitted back to the Commission within 21 days of the effective date. 10. *All catch basins shall have deep sumps and pipes shall be fitted with oil and gas traps. The entire drainage system, including street sweepings, catch basin clean outs, manholes, and maintenance of swales, sediment forebays, detention areas. shall be required to follow the attached approved Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan as amended and be recorded as one with this Order. If.. as, and when the City of Salem should accept Carol Way, Weatherly Drive, or America Way as a public street, the maintenance of the stormwater management system, as incorporated herein, excluding the storm drains. catch basins, and manholes located within the street layout, shall remain with the developer, its successors or assigns. 11. *A letter confirming the implementation of the cleaning and maintenance schedule shall be filed with this Commission biannually on June 15 and December 15. 12. Equipment servicing and overnight equipment storage must be conducted outside the buffer zone. Equipment must be maintained to prevent leakage or discharge of pollutants. 13. *No spill or discharge of petroleum products or other pollutants will occur within 100 feet of any wetland resource area. 14. Notice shall be given this Commission no more than 2 weeks nor less than 2 days prior to the commencement of construction activities. Said notice shall include, in writing, the names(s), address(es), and business and home telephone numbers of the project supervisor(s) responsible for insuring that operations are conducted in compliance with this Order. 15. *No removal of any buffer zone or wetland vegetation will occur downgradient of the staked haybale line. 16. The No Cut/ No Disturbance Zone as shown an the plans (pre-construction) shall be extended eighty five feet (85') southerly and be enlarged to include the entire wetland resource area. The No Cut/No Disturbance Zone as shown on the plans and as expanded above shall be further expanded after construction is completed (post-construction) from top of haybale line upgradient easterly to the 70' topography line. The final No Cut / No Disturbance Zone (wetland resource area, expanded pre-construction, and post- construction zones) shall be combined as one and mathmatized on a modified plan C-6 for grading, drainage and erosion. No work shall be performed until copies of the modified plan are submitted to and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission. As-Built drawings shall show the enlarged, pre and post-construction zones as one mathmatized No Cut / No Disturbance Zone. Deed restrictions shall be placed on the individual deeds to reference and identify the final No Cut/ No Disturbance Zone. Individual deeds shall also include these Special Conditions. Copies of proposed deeds are to be submitted to and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy permits. of 3 iI dISUIMCd soils silaii be imnrediarei� upon comnietion of construction u"Iicl;c Ili ':nII. _.. -1X 1 - _ 01 _ ._:M Sc�1,111 Ili ....udi:.7 no later tnan i S. Fertilizers used for is ndscaoin« and Iav,n care shall contain a lo%a nitrogen content and be used in moderation. Pesticides and herbicides shall not be used within i00 feet of the resource area. 19. 1 plan for landscaomL, and maintenance of vegetation for the buffer zone shall be developed"and ubmiued for Conservation Commission appro�ai prior to commencement of work. 20. rhe Order of Conditions including diese Special Conditions shall be posted on site. aTTACH.'VIENT: Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan, 4 pages 'ongoing conditions that do not expire upon completion of the project or issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. ,Tconwmlooc'.cinnim i J of IIID Carol Wav Residence-Stormwater Maintenance Plan Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan This Operation and Maintenance Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Management Policy, as revised March 1997 and is based on site design and water quality issues for the project site. Project Site Carol Way Residences (The Village at Vinnin Square, Phase Four) Loring Avenue Salem,Massachusetts Property Owner Vinnin Square, L.L.C. Zero Weatherly Drive Salem, MA Maintenance Commitment Vinnin Square,L.L.C. recognizes the role that regular inspection and maintenance play in the proper functioning of structural drainage components. Vinnin Square, L.L.C., its successor's assigns and interests is committed to the following comprehensive maintenance program to provide for the effective and safe operation of the open and closed drainage system proposed for Phase Four of the Village at Vinnin Square. Vinnin Square L.L.C.,as part of its obligation as managing agent for Phase Four, will reserve approximately$3000 to 54000 for regular maintenance of the drainage system. This obligation will remain a matter of record on the master deed for the Phase Four properties and run with the individual deeds for residential units. YLl(� �aroi Wav Pesiaence-Smrmwater&iamtenance. Ian Stormwater Management System The Caroi'vVav Residences site design includes a ciosed drainage system designed to collect and treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge from the system. The site has been designed to n- nimize the conveyance of pollutants from paved surfaces to wetland resource areas. This objective is achieved by a combination of overall site design, drainage structures and proper maintenance of paved areas and treatment devices. Structural Features The following structural components are included in the proposed system. • curbing and pavement • catchbasins with deep sumps and oil separation hoods • roof drains • stormwater discharges (shown as flared end sections-FES) • stormwater infiltration basin • stormwater detention basins with sediment forebays and energy dissipating rip-rap The location of each drainage structure is shown on the Project Plans included in Attachment A. The Grading and Drainage Plans (See Sheet C-6 and C-7)show the location of each structure an identifies proposed grading on the site. Non-structural and Maintenance Activities The following site maintenance activities are required to maintain optimal pollutant attenuation by the drainage system. • Periodic inspection of all catchbasins,including grates,sumps,oil separation hoods and outlets. • Periodic pavement sweeping to minimize the introduction of pollutants into the drainage system. • Semi-annual clean-out of all catchbasin sumps in accordance with the Order of Conditions. • Semi-annual inspection of all stormwater discharges on the site. • Semi-annual inspection of the infiltration basin. • Semi-annual inspection of all earthen slopes adjacent to wetlands and detention basins on the project site. • Inspection of the vegetated water quality/drainage swale on Lot B. ! arol wav Residence-�mrmwater:Maintenance?ian • Semi-annuai inspection of all earthen slopes adjacent to wetlands and detention basins on the project site. • Inspection of the vegetated water quality/drainage swaie on Lot B. Specific Maintenance Procedures The following maintenance activities will be performed as specified by the following schedule. Tasks will be completed by the specified date and a record of completed maintenance tasks maintained. 1. After all snow fall events • Clear all catchbasin grates • Inspect all drainage swales for obstructions or inappropriately stored snow. • Temporarily store snow onsite outside buffer zones as required. No snow disposal is to occur in wetlands,buffer zones or detention basins. • Excess snow shall be removed from the site and disposed of in an approved manner. ROADWAY DEICING Sodium chloride salt is currently,and shall continue to be used for roadway deicing on the project site. However,salt use shall be limited to the minimum required to maintain sand spreadability. April 15 1. Inspect all sideslopes and buffer zones for substantial erosion or settling due to storm damage or other causes. 2. Inspect all perimeter curbing for damage. 3. Inspect all stormwater discharges for structural damage, cracks or obstructions. • Obstructions shall be removed within 24 hours, or immediately if they present the potential for adverse impacts to wetlands by erosion,local flooding or short-circuiting of drainage structures. • Structural abnormalities or damage to flared end sections,vegetated and rip-rap swales,stormwater discharges,etc. shall be reported to the Site Supervisor or Facilities Manager immediately. 4. Inspect catchbasins for obstructions and damage. Remove any obstructions and report structural damage to site supervisor. 5. Remove all accumulated trash, litter and discarded materials from buffer zone areas. No disposal of materials will be oermitted within buffer zones on the TABllll.) :.1Toi Y�1V a=, Iva te,Ylaintemance!"2n project site. ::us prohibition applies to rill material, construction debris,grass clippings, collected leaves, cut branches or similar material from landscaped areas. May 15 i. Vacuum sweep all paved parking areas. 2. Vacuum clean all catchbasin sumps. May 15 through October 15 (as appropriate) 1. Remove all accumulated trash, litter and discarded materials from buffer zone areas. _. Inspect all catchbasins, discharges, vegetated and rip-rap swales for obstructions, structural damage or other indication of malfunction. Report any unexpected conditions to Site Supervisor or Facilities Manager within 24 hours. Twice per growing season - Mow the sideslopes and berm surrounding the detention basins. Grass cuttings are to be removed from the site and may not be disposed of in wetlands,buffer zones or stormwater detention areas. This maintenance task is required to prevent the establishment of large woody vegetation in areas surrounding the detention basins to maintain structural stabilitv of the berms. October 31 1. Inspect all sideslopes and buffer zones for substantial erosion or settling due to storm damage or other causes. 2. Inspect all perimeter curbing for damage. 3. Inspect all stormwater discharges for structural damage,cracks or obstructions. • Obstructions shall be removed within 24 hours,or immediately if they present the potential for adverse impacts to wetlands by erosion, local flooding or short-circuiting of drainage structures. • Structural abnormalities or damage to flared end sections, vegetated and rip-rap swales,stormwater discharges,etc.shall be reported to the Site Supervisor or Facilities Manager immediately. 4. Inspect catchbasins for obstructions. 5. Remove all accumulated trash, litter and discarded materials from buffer zone areas. No disposal of materials will be permitted within buffer zones on the project site. This prohibition applies to fill material,construction debris, grass clippings,collected leaves, cut branches from landscaped areas. 7� :EP F i l e a o. b4-272 (To be provided by OEP) Fo= b City/Tow 'slam Applicant Vinnin square L.L.0 Common weal L; of Massachusetts - Order of Conditions Massacnuects Wetlands Protection Act G.L . c . 131 , §40 From Salem Conservation Commission Issuing Authority Vinnin Square LLC c/o Steven Zieff same To (Name of Applicant) (Name of property owner) 01970 Address 0 Weatheriv Dr. Salem, bLA Address This order issued and delivered as Follows : ❑ by hand __ivery aoo't-..ant or reoreseniiaZ.1%,e (date) El oy certified mail, return receipt requested on. 3/2/98 - (date). This projec is located a Lorinq Ave, Weather1v Dr. , America Wav, & Carol Wav The property is recorded at the Registry of gi;sax Book 7250 pace 140 Certificate (if registered) The Notice of T-tent for this project was filed cn Dec. 23, 1998 (date) The public hearing was closed on. Feb. 26, 1996 (date) Findings The Commission has reviewed the above•reierenced Notice or Intent and plans and has held a puolic hearing on the project. Sased on the information available to the C•nmmi ccinn at this time, the ro.�.�; szi�n has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection under the Act (check as appropriate): Public water supply flood Control lard containing shellfish Private water supply Storm damage prevention Fisheries Ground water supply I Prevention of pollution Protection of Wildlife Habitat Totel Filing Fee Submitted 1300.00 State Share 637.50 (1/2 fee in excess of S25) 662.50 City/Tow Share Total Refund Due S City/Town Portion S State Portions (1/2 total) (1/2 total) Therefore, the Commission hereby finds c:.at _:- _cllcwing conditions are necessary, in accordance 4_th the Performance Standards _et forth -.. the regulations , protect _:hose _..terests checked above. The aFt orders Chat ail work shall- he nerformed In accordance with saic conc_tions and with the Notice of intent re .. referenced above. To the _ teat c at the following o conditions modifv or diff__ from the plans , specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to cc=ly with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, snail be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2 . The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights . 3 . This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes , ordinances, by-laws or regulations . 4 . The work authorized hereunder shall '^_ completed within three years from the date of this order unless eitherof the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6 . Any ) ill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8 . No work shall be undertaken until the Final order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry' s Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, the Final order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording informatin shall be submitted to the Commission on the form at the end of this Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, File Number 64-272 " 10. where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to make a determination and to issue a Suoersedina Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a oarcy to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department . Jpon omple-z-1= =e work desci--ed nerern. _.._ applicant shall '_ort:^with _e?uest in writing _n-=t a Cert:c_c __ C3mpliance be issued stating tha; _-e work ..as satiscactori' , __mpietea. 12 . The work wall ccn_orm to the :ollowinc plans and speciai Conditions: lays : Title Datea Signed and Stamped by: On File with: Carol '.lav Residential Dev. 12/19/97 Richard S. Hollworth Commission Special Conditions (use additional paper i= necessary) SEE ATTACHED (Leave Soace Blank) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . issued Ev i Ccrser•:ati cn commission naur (s)C Sig � � Thi Or `,must !�e signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. On this 26th day. of Februaryly 98 before me personally appearea the above mentioned to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed thel 15atre as his/her free act and deed. STEPHEN DIBBLE Nobiry Public / MYCMIunision bpites Nov.12,2004 NOC P lic My commission expires The applicant, the owner, any person agrrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby rctified of their right to request the Department of Environmental Protection to issue a Superseding Order, providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7), within ten days from the date of issuance of this determination. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and the applicant. Detach an dotted (ire and submit to the Commi sgion prior to commencement of work. ............................................................................................................ To Issuing Authority Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at File Number has been recorded at the Registry of and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on ,19 If recorded land, the instrument nurber which identifies this transaction is If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is Signature Applicant 5-a:. SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION SPECIAL CONDITIONS - DEP FILE #64-272 Village at Vinnin Square (Phase 4) Preamble: The Commission. pursuant to the Rivers Protection Act. as a result of a review of the most recent USGS map (1985), a site visit. and all information presented including the Superseding Determination of Applicability filed on 8/3/93, and failing evidentiary contradicting support, has determined that the Rivers Protection Act does not apply to this wetland resource. 1. All work shall conform to the above-referenced Notice of Intent, site plan and supporting documents and those final specifications which shall be filed with the Commission prior to construction. Any change made or intended to be made to the approved plans, whether or not requested by another Department, shall require the applicant to inquire of the Commission in writing whether the change is substantial enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 2. Members and agents of the Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises at all reasonable times to evaluate compliance with the conditions in this Order. The Commission may require the applicant to submit additional data or information necessary for the Commission to conduct that evaluation. 3. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall submit, with the request for a Certification of Compliance, an affidavit, prepared by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, stating that the site has been developed in accordance with the requirements of this Order of Conditions, the referenced site plan and supporting documents. 4. This Order shall apply to every successor in control or successor in interest of the property described int he Notice of Intent and accompanying plans or part thereof. In the event this land or any part thereof changes ownership before or during construction, the current owner shall notify the new owner, by registered mail, of this Order prior to the transfer of ownership and shall forward proof of this notification to the Commission. 5. Prior to commencement of construction activity, a haybale barrier shall be placed downgradient of construction to prevent siltation of the adjacent wetland. Haybales shall be anchored with stakes and entrenched 4 to 6 inches in depth. Trench material shall be deposited on the upgradient side of the haybale barrier. Haybales shall be inspected daily; those showing signs of deterioration shall be replaced immediately. The haybale barrier shall remain in proper functioning condition until all disturbed areas have been stabilized. 6. Additional erosion and sedimentation control measures deemed necessary by the Commission shall be instituted by the applicant. Any siltation caused onto any wetland or waterway area shall be promptly reported to the Commission. Such areas shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Commission. 7. During construction, no debris, fill, or excavated material shall be stockpiled within 100 feet of designated wetlands. Any other stockpile location will be protected sufficient to prevent sediment from surface runoff entering wetlands. 1 of 3 S. �.;ranite or concrete curbing shall be instailed around the parking iot oerimeter to contain and direct .ite [10\c of �Aater to catch basins. . 9. The Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be submitted to and approved b% the City of Salem Engineer with any changes noted and submitted back to the Commission %%ithin ?1 days of the effective date. 10. "All catch basins shall have deep sumps and pipes shall be fitted with oil and gas traps. The entire drainage s%stem, including street sweepings, catch basin clean outs. manholes, and maintenance of swales, sediment forebays, detention areas. shall be required to follow the attached approved Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan as amended and be recorded as one with this Order. If, as, and when the City of Salem should accept Carol Way, Weatherly Drive. or America Way as a public street, the maintenance of the stormwater management system, as incorporated herein, excluding the storm drains. catch basins. and manholes located within the street layout. shall remain with the developer, its successors or assigns. 11. *A letter confirming the implementation of the cleaning and maintenance schedule shall be filed with this Commission biannually on lune 15 and December 15. 12. Equipment servicing and overnight equipment storage must be conducted outside the buffer zone. Equipment must be maintained to prevent leakage or discharge of pollutants. 13. *No spill or discharge of petroleum products or other pollutants will occur within 100 feet of any wetland resource area. 14. Notice shall be given this Commission no more than 2 weeks nor less than 2 days prior to the commencement of construction activities. Said notice shall include. in writing, the names(s), address(es), and business and home telephone numbers of the project supervisor(s) responsible for insuring that operations are conducted in compliance with this Order. 1-5. 'No removal of any buffer zone or wetland vegetation will occur downgradient of the staked haybale line. 16. The No Cut/No Disturbance Zone as shown an the plans (pre-construction) shall be extended eighty Five feet (33') southerly and be enlarged to include the entire wetland resource area. The No Cut/No Disturbance Zone as shown on the plans and as expanded above shall be further expanded after construction is completed (post-construction) from top of haybale line upgradient easterly to the 70' topography line. The Final No Cut / No Disturbance Zone (wetland resource area, expanded pre-construction, and post- construction zones) shall be combined as one and mathmatized on a modified plan C-6 for grading, drainage and erosion. No work shall be performed until copies of the modified plan are submitted to and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission. As-Built drawings shall show the enlarged, pre and post-construction zones as one mathmatized No Cut / No Disturbance Zone. Deed restrictions shall be placed on the individual deeds to reference and identify the final No Cut/ No Disturbance Zone. Individual deeds shall also include these Special Conditions. Copies of proposed deeds are to be submitted to and approved by the Salem Conservation Commission prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy permits. of 3 %. .11 disturbed soils shall be immediateiv and similarly re-vegetated upon comoietion of construction cnwiiies or shall be mulched untii the next growing season. Hvdroseeding :will be initiated no later than September 15. 13. *Fertilizers used for landscaping and lawn care shall contain a low nitrogen content and be used in moderation. Pesticides and herbicides shall not be used within 100 feet of the resource area. 19. A plan for landscaping and maintenance of vegetation for the buffer zone shall be developed and submitted for Conservation Commission approval prior to commencement of work. 20. The Order of Conditions including these Special Conditions shall be posted on site. ATTACHMENT: Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan, 4 pages 'ongoing conditions that do not expire upon completion of the project or issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. sd\wncom\ooc\vinninv i - 3 of 3 Carol Wav Residence-:tornwarer Maintenance?!an Stormwater Management System Operation and Maintenance Plan This Operation and Maintenance Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Management Policy, as revised March 1997 and is based on site design and water quality issues for the project site. Project Site Carol Way Residences (The Village at Vir n n Square,Phase Four) Loring Avenue Salem,Massachusetts Property Owner Vinnin Square,L.L.C. Zero Weatherly Drive Salem,MA Maintenance Commitment Vinnin Square,L.L.C.recognizes the role that regular inspection and maintenance play in the proper functioning of structural drainage components. Vinnin Square, L.L.C.,its successor's assigns and interests is committed to the following comprehensive maintenance program to provide for the effective and safe operation of the open and closed drainage system proposed for Phase Four of the Village at Vinnin Square. Vinnin Square L.L.C.,as part of its obligation as managing agent for Phase Four, will reserve approximately 53000 to 54000 for regular maintenance of the drainage system. This obligation will remain a matter of record on the master deed for the Phase Four properties and run with the individual deeds for residential units. HB Carol Way Resiaence-Stormwater Maintenance Plan Stormwater Management System The Carol Way Residences site design includes a closed drainage system designed to _.collect and treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge from the system. The site has been designed to minimize the conveyance of pollutants from paved surfaces to wetland resource areas. This objective is achieved by a combination of overall site design, drainage structures and proper maintenance of paved areas and treatment devices. Structural Features The following structural components are included in the proposed system. • curbing and pavement • catchbasins with deep sumps and oil separation hoods • roof drains • stormwater discharges(shown as flared end sections-FES) • stormwater infiltration basin • stormwater detention basins with sediment forebays and energy dissipating rip-rap The location of each drainage structure is shown on the Project Plans included in Attachment A. The Grading and Drainage Plans(See Sheet C-6 and C-7)show the location of each structure an identifies proposed grading on the site. Non-structural and Maintenance Activities The following site maintenance activities are required to maintain optimal pollutant attenuation by the drainage system. • Periodic inspection of all catchbasins, including grates,sumps,oil separation hoods and outlets. • Periodic pavement sweeping to minimize the introduction of pollutants into the drainage system. • Semi-annual clean-out of all catchbasin sumps in accordance with the Order of Conditions. • Semi-annual inspection of all stormwater discharges on the site. • Semi-annual inspection of the infiltration basin. • Semi-annual inspection of all earthen slopes adjacent to wetlands and detention basins on the project site. • Inspection of the vegetated water quality/drainage swale on Lot B. UBCarol Wav Residence-�rormwater iblaintenance Plan • Semi-annuai inspection of all earthen slopes adjacent to wetlands and detention basins on the project site. • Inspection of the vegetated water quality/drainage swale on Lot B. Specific Maintenance Procedures The following maintenance activities will be performed as specified by the following schedule. Tasks will be completed by the specified date and a record of completed maintenance tasks maintained. 1. After all snow fall events • Clear all catchbasin grates • Inspect all drainage swales for obstructions or inappropriately stored snow. • Temporarily store snow onsite outside buffer zones as required. No snow disposal is to occur in wetlands,buffer zones or detention basins. • Excess snow shall be removed from the site and disposed of in an approved manner. ROADWAY DEICING Sodium chloride salt is currently,and shall continue to be used for roadway deicing on the project site. However,salt use shall be limited to the minimum required to maintain sand soreadability. April 15 1. Inspect all sideslopes and buffer zones for substantial erosion or settling due to storm damage or other causes. 2. Inspect all perimeter curbing for damage. 3. Inspect all stormwater discharges for structural damage,cracks or obstructions. • Obstructions shall be removed within 24 hours,or immediately if they present the potential for adverse impacts to wetlands by erosion, local flooding or short-circuiting of drainage structures. • Structural abnormalities or damage to flared end sections,vegetated and rip-rap swales,stormwater discharges,etc. shall be reported to the Site Supervisor or Facilities Manager immediately. 4. Inspect catchbasins for obstructions and damage. Remove any obstructions and report structural damage to site supervisor. 5. Remove all accumulated trash, litter and discarded materials from buffer zone areas. No disposal of materials will be permitted within buffer zones on the HBCarol Way Residence-Stormwater Maintenance Plan project site.. This prohibition applies to fill material,construction debris,grass clippings,collected leaves,cut branches or similar material from landscaped areas. May 15 1. Vacuum sweep all paved parking areas. 2. Vacuum clean all catchbasin sumps. May 15 through October 15 (as appropriate) 1. Remove all accumulated trash,litter and discarded materials from buffer zone areas. 2. Inspect all catchbasins,discharges,vegetated and rip-rap swales for obstructions,structural damage or other indication of malfunction. Report any unexpected conditions to Site Supervisor or Facilities Manager within 24 hours. 3. Twice per growing season- Mow the sideslopes and berm surrounding the detention basins. Grass cuttings are to be removed from the site and may not be disposed of in wetlands,buffer zones or stormwater detention areas. This maintenance task is required to prevent the establishment of large woody vegetation in areas surrounding the detention basins to maintain structural stability of the berms. October 31 1. Inspect all sideslopes and buffer zones for substantial erosion or settling due to storm damage or other causes. 2. Inspect all perimeter curbing for damage. 3. Inspect all stormwater discharges for structural damage,cracks or obstructions. • Obstructions shall be removed within 24 hours,or immediately if they present the potential for adverse impacts to wetlands by erosion,local flooding or short-circuiting of drainage structures. • Structural abnormalities or damage to flared end sections,vegetated and rip-rap swales,stormwater discharges,etc.shall be reported to the Site Supervisor or Facilities Manager immediately. 4. Inspect catchbasins for obstructions. 5. Remove all accumulated trash, litter and discarded materials from buffer zone areas. No disposal of materials will be permitted within buffer zones on the project site. This prohibition applies to fill material,construction debris, grass clippings,collected leaves,cut branches from landscaped areas. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Metropolitan Boston - Northeast Regional Office ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI Governor BOB DURAND Secretary JANE SWIFT Lieutenant Governor uren Liss J U L 131999 Commissioner Daniel J. Padien WETLANDS/SALEM VHB, Inc. DEP File No. 064-0272 101 Walnut Street Plan Charge .,ha:.ge Watertown, MA 02471-9151 Dear Sir: The Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection, Wetlands Division, is in receipt of your April 22, 1999 letter, wherein you describe and ask for a minor modification to the above-referenced project. You will recall that the Department issued on December 31, 1998 a Final Superseding Order of Conditions (SOC). Since the project has a final Order of Conditions, Department Policy 91-1 (rev. March 1, 1995) describes the appropriate procedure. Briefly, you(the project proponents)propose to: 1) Replace residential building "C" with (16) single-unit buildings (six of which will be within the 100-foot Buffer Zone [BZ] of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland)and(2) six-unit buildings. 2) Change building "D" by adding a retaining wall (as opposed to previously-planned grading), with the effect of eliminating some 2075 square feet of grading within the BZ. 3) Reconfigure Lots 1 and 2, primarily by substituting Building "A" for the similarly-sized Building "B" and relocating the existing Carol Way. This would require the redesign of the stormwater collection system, including the addition of a Stormceptor unit, which would improve TSS removal from the redeveloped part of the project to 33%. The Department considers these changes to be simple modifications, as opposed to amendments or entirely new projects, because they lessen wetland impacts, as described in the above-referenced policy. However, the Department wishes to regulate one aspect. This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)574-6872. 205a Lowell St. Wilmington, MA 01887 • Phone (978)661-7600 • Fax (978)661-7615 •TDD 4(978)661-7679 0 Prints w Recyde Paper As you may know, our stormwater management policy does not include the Stormceptor technique; however, that policy has the flexibility to include new technologies. In that this new technology has an incomplete performance history, we add some maintenance requirements in order to assure its continued performance. . The December 31, 1998 SOC is hereby revised by the addition of Special Condition#12(c), which reads as follows: "The plan referenced in 12(a) above is replaced and superseded, in all cases in which the two plans differ, by sheets C-1 through C-16 and Ex-1 and Ex-2, all dated March 12, 1999 and stamped by Richard S. Hollworth on March 20, 1999." . The SOC is also hereby revised by the addition of#12(d): "The Stormceptor structure shall be cleaned at least twice annually, unless inspection results cause the Department to change this requirement BEFOREHAND and IN WRITING." Please be advised that the Department's approval of the Stormceptor was judged to be appropriate IN THIS CASE ONLY, and shall not be construed as a broader endorsement of this technique. Should you have any questions, please contact Margaret Finn or Ralph Perkins of the Wetlands and Waterways Section at(978)661-7600. Very truly yours, Wetlands and Waterways ivisi n Ralph er es A. praj.e Section Chief cc: Conservation Commission, Town Hall, Swampscott,MA 01907 Conservation Commission, City Hall, Salem, MA 01971 Vinnin Square L.L.C., c\o Steven Zieff, 0 Weatherly Drive, Salem, MA 01970 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Metropolitan Boston - Northeast Regional Office ARGEO PdUL CELLUCCI GO\_mor TRUDY COSE Secreta DAVID B.STRUHS Commissioner DEC 311998 Edward Butler, Robert Johnson RE: WETLANDS/SALEM 50 Weatherly Drive DEP File # 064-0272 Salem, MA 01970 Superseding Order of Conditions _ear Sirs : The Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Protection, Wetlands Division, has completed its review of the above-referenced filing, for construction of three residential condominium buildings, -andscaping, drainage, utilities and other site preparation, and for the resumption (only partly completed under an earlier effort) of landscaping and associated work around an existing pond - all at Lots 96 and 242 of Map 21, and Lot 12 of Map 20 on Loring Avenue, America way\Weatherly Drive and Carol Way - in preparation to issuing a Superseding Order of Conditions . Pursuant to the provisions of the Wetlands Protection Act (the Act) under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 131, Section 40, the Department is issuing the enclosed Superseding Order of Conditions allowing the project , based upon: 1) information contained in the file to date and plans submitted; 2) information gathered during she April 28, 1998 on-site inspection and subsequently by the Department ; and 3) reasons the Department has deemed necessary to protect the statutory interests identified in the Act . The Department ' s review of the file and site inspection confirm that the project site contains the following Areas Subject to Jurisdiction of the Act : The 100-foot Buffer Zone (BZ) to 3ordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) and Bank, Bank itself, BVW itself , and Land under Water (LUW) ; all activity would be limited to the BZ itself . These resource areas (and through them the BZ) are presumed by the Act ' s regulations to likely be significant to the statutory interests of protection of groundwater, protection of water supply, protection of fisheries, prevention of pollution, This information is available in alternate format by calling our ADA Coordinator at(617)573-6872. 205a Lowell St . Wilmington, MA 01887 • Phone (978 ) 661-7600 • Fax (978 ) 661-7615 • TDD # (978) 661-7679 0 Print on Ra deo Paper page 2 064 - 0272 SOC protection of wildlife :-abitat , flood control and storm damage prevention. The site is a +-11 .2-acre parcel, portions of which are filled or otherwise disturbed, but not built up. Generally, it is bounded on the South by the (Swampscott) Cemetery and the Loring Towers development, to the West by an on-site wetland and an earlier phase of the prosect, to the North by an earlier project phase, and to the East by Loring Avenue and Carol Way. Landscaping would occur along an ex-- sting pathway around the site ' s small pond. Your March 2 , 1998 ':received March 6 , 1998) letter of appeal cited a num:er of objections to the Commission' s order of conditions . These objections are discussed below: Stream. An earlier Department decision (a 1993 Superseding Determination of Applicab_lity (SDA) ) commented that a stream was present, but _here was no determination as to whether or not that stream was Perennial . As you know, the perennial status of a stream is crucial in terms of the applicability of the "Rivers Act" regulations at 310 CMR 10 . 58 . The Department finds that the stream is first order, is not named, has a very small watershed, is intermittent on current USGS maps , and has been observed not to flow during non-drought t_mes . It may be the case that unspecified fill dumped near the wetland by unknown persons years ago MAY have changed flows and\or directions, but the information submitted would not, in the Department ' s opinion, support a determination of stream permanence, or an enforcement action. Earlier USGS maps appear to suggest perennial status, but reliance upon those maps is contraindicated by 10 . 58 (2) (a) (1) (a) , which establishes the (rebuttable) presumption that the status depicted on the current' USGS map is correct . . Vernal Pools. In your appeal letter, at the site visit, and at other times, you claimed that a Vernal Pool (s; you suggested that there may be two) existed in the wetland. The Department has worked with the Commonwealth' s Natural Heritage and Endangered Species (NHESP) program, as well as several other agencies, to identify and to regulatorily certify vernal pools, and to provide avenues for parties such as yourselves to overcome lacks of certification. The applicant, in noting that no certified vernal pool exists on the site according to NHESP ' s Natural Heritage Atlas of suc sites, created the (rebuttable) presumption that no vernal pool exists . The epartment ' s observation of the site, and its consideration of other pertinent information, has not shown the existence of vernal _cools . . Pond Landscaping. The applicant has provided (the September 18 , 1998 letter of VHB, its consultant) an easement agreement with Grosvenor Park, allowing access for the work by the appropriate party. age 3 :4-0272 SOC It is very clear that you have many genuine concerns arding this proposal, and that you have etcended much time in =tllecting information. =cw=ver, the Department is of the opinion _ at the enclosed Superseding Order of Cond cions allowing the .roject serves to protect the statutory interests identified in -_e Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. Chapter 131 , Section 40 . -wever, the Department reserves the right , should there be _:rther proceedings in this case, to raise additional issues and _resent further evidence as may be appropriate . Should you or any =oncerned party dispute these findings, your attention is directed -o the language at the end of the enclosed Crder specifying the -'_ghts and procedures for appeal . Should you have any questions, please contact Margaret Finn __ Ralph Perkins of the Wetlands and Waterways Section at ;78) 661-7600 . Very truly yo s, v� Wetlands and Waterwa s D vision =alp Perkins amen S ag Sec C. ie= -_ . Conservation Commissicn, Town Hall, Swampscott , NSA 01907 Conservation Commission, City Hall, Salem, MA 01971 Vinnin Square L.L.C. , c\o Steven Zieff, 0 Weatherly Drive, Salem, MA 01970 310 CMR 10 . 99 Form 5 DEP File No. 064-0272 i (To be provided by DEP) City/Town Salem Applicant Vinnin Square LLC Superseding Order of Conditions Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act G.L. c . 131, X40 From_Department of Environmental Protection To Vinnin Square LLC (c\o Steven Zeiff) (Name of Applicant) Address_0 Weatherly Drive, Salem, MA 01970 (applicant) To Same (Name of Property Owner) Address (owner) This Order is issued and delivered as follows: F-1 by hand delivery to applicant or representative on (date) }{ by certified mail, return receipt requested on December 1998 (date) This project is located at Loring Ave. , America Way, Carol Way, Weatherly Drive The property is recorded at the Registry of Deeds, Essex Book 7250 Page 140 Certificate (if registered) The Notice of Intent for this project was filed on or about December 23, 1997 (date) The public hearing was closed on February 26, 1998 (date) Findings The Department of Environmental Protection has reviewed the above-referenced Notice of Intent and plans and has held a site inspection on the project. Based on the information available to the Department of Environmental Protection at this time, the Department of Environmental Protection has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to the following interests in accordance with the Presumptions of Significance set forth in the regulations for each Area Subject to Protection Under the Act (check as appropriate) : r] Public water supply Xn Flood control n Land containing shellfish pq Private water supplyCl Storm damage prevention Xn Fisheries M Ground water supply VlPrevention of pollution Xn Protection of wildlife habitat Total Filing Fee Submitted $1300.00 State Share $637. 50 Effective 11/20/92 5-1 City/Town Share $602 . 50 (f fee in excess of $25) Total Refund Due $ City/Town Portion $ State Portion $ N total) ('6 total) Effective 11/20/92 5-2 Therefore, the Department of Environmental Protection hereby finds that the following conditions are necessary, in accordance with the Performance Standards set forth in the regulations, to protect those interests checked above. The Department of Environmental Protection orders that all work shall be performed in accordance with said conditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. General Conditions 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3 . This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes, ordinances, by-laws or regulations. 4 . The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: (a) the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or (b) the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less than five years, from the date of issuance and both that date and the special circumstances warranting the extended time period are set forth in this Order. 5. This order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years eachupon application to the issuing authority at. least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6 . Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. No work shall be undertaken until all administrative appeal periods from this order have elapsed or, if such an appeal has been filed, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8 . No work shall be undertaken until the Final Order has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of registered land, the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. The recording information shall be submitted to the Department of Effective 11/20/92 5-3 Environmental Protection on the form at the end o` t_-.is Order prior to commencement of the work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, File Number 064-0272 . 11 10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to make a determination and to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department. 5-4 11. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request in writing that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 12 . The work shall conform to the following plans and special conditions: (See Attached) Title: (See attached. ) Dated: Signed & Stamped by: On File With: See attached special conditions numbered 12 through 25 . Issued by the!/Department of-Zivironmental Protection Signature , i On this `d day of December 1998 before me persona ly appeared James A. Sprague to m nown to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Nota4 Public My commissilon expires The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by the Superseding Order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten persons pursuant to G.L. c. 30A §10A, are hereby notified of their right to request an adjudicatory hearing pursuant to G.L. c.30A, 510, providing the request is made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and Fee Transmittal Form as provided in 310 CMR 10.03 (7) , within ten days from the date of issuance of this Superseding Order, and is addressed to: Docket Clerk, Office of General Counsel, Department of Environmental Protection, One Winter Street, Boston, MA 02108 . A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission, the applicant, and any other party. 5-5 A Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing shall comply wich the Department' s Rules for Adjudicatory Proceedings . 310 CMR 1 .01 (6) , and shall contain the following information: (a) the DEP Wetlands File Number, name of the applicant and address of the project. (b) the complete name, address and telephone number of the party filing the request, and, if represented by counsel, the name and address of the attorney; (c) the names and addresses of all other parties, if known; 5-6 (d) --a clear and concise statement of (1) the facts which are grounds for the proceedings, (2) the objections to this Superseding Order, including specifically the manner in which it is alleged to be inconsistent with the Department ' s Wetlands Regulations (310 CMR 10 . 00) and does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Act, and (3) the relief sought through the adjudicatory hearing, including specifically the changes desired in the Superseding Order; (e) a statement that a copy of the request has been sent to the applicant, the conservation commission and each other party or representative of such party, if known. Failure to submit all necessary information may result in a dismissal by the Department of the Notice of Claim for an Adjudicatory Hearing. Detach on dotted line and submit to the Department of Environmental Protection prior to commencement of work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . To Department of Environmental Protection, Issuing Authority. Please be advised that the Order of Conditions for the project at Assessors' map 21, Lots 96, 242; Map 20, Lot 12, File Number 064-0272, has been recorded at the Registry of Essex, and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in accordance with General Condition 8 on 19 If recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is Signature Applicant 5-7 Special Conditions File # 064-0272 12 . (a) All activity shall conform to the project Notice of Intent, as well as all of its attachments and supporting documents, # 064-0272 submitted by Vanasse, Hangen Brustlin Inc . (VHB) , for Vinnin Square LLC, the applicant, on or about December 23 , 1997 , except as modified subsequently or as described elsewhere in this Superseding Order of Conditions . The plan submitted with that Notice is titled "Carol Way Residential Development , Loring Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, " December 19, 1997, signed and stamped by Richard S . Hollworth, sheets C-1 through C-16 . (b) Additionally, access to the area of the site ' s small pond shall be governed, where applicable, by the December 18 , 1997 Agreement between Vinnin Square LLC and Grosvenor Park LP. 13 . No work shall commence on-site until all appeal periods have elapsed and this Superseding Order of Conditions has been recorded appropriately with the registry of deeds, and the Department formally notified via the form provided at the end of this Order. 14 . Any change (s) made in the plans, etc . referenced in condition 12 which will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Wetlands Protection Act, or any change (s) in activity subject to regulation under M.G.L. Chapter 131, Section 40, shall require the applicant to inquire of the Department, in writing, as to whether the change (s) is significant enough to require the filing of a new notice of intent . A copy of said request shall at the same time be sent to the Conservation Commission. 15 . The applicant shall notify the Department and the Conservation Commission in writing, 48 hours before any further or new activity commences on site . 16 . The site as identified in the project plans shall be maintained in a clean and orderly condition. Refuse, debris and waste materials shall not be placed within any resource area under any circumstance, and shall be disposed of promptly and properly. All construction refuse, debris and waste materials shall be removed from the site upon completion of the construction activities . 17 . Upon completion of the project and prior to or with any request for a Certificate of Compliance, an As-Built plan or an appropriate narrative shall be submitted for the Department ' s approval . 18 . Equipment shall be . stored in a manner and location which will minimize potential environmental impacts . Fuel storage and the refueling of vehicles shall be conducted outside of the buffer zone in an upland location at a horizontal distance greater than 100 feet from the boundaries of the wetlands, or on an accepted public way. 19 . This Order of Conditions supersedes all prior orders under DEP File #064-0272 . 20 . This Order applies only to those activities described in the Notice of Intent for DEP file #064-0272 referenced above in this Superseding Order, and may not be construed as approving any other activities which could affect an interest subject to the jurisdiction of the Wetlands Protection Act . 21 . Members and agents of the Conservation Commission and the Department shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises to evaluate compliance with conditions stated in this Superseding Order. The applicant shall submit any data the Department deems necessary for that evaluation. 22 . This Order shall apply to all successors or assigns in interest or control and any other party engaging in activity on the property identified in the Notice of Intent . 23 . A copy of this Superseding Order of Conditions, as well as the plans referenced in condition 12 , shall be available on site and shall remain there while activities regulated by this Order are being performed. Copies of said documents shall be accessible to all contractors and subcontractors . 24 . Upon completion of the construction phase of this project (ie, stabilization or final vegetation of all slopes, surfaces, etc . ) , all silt fencing and other erosion control structures shall be removed from the site. 25 . The attached cover letter is hereby and severally made a part of this Order of Conditions, and shall be recorded at the Registry of Deeds together with that Order. FINDINGS PURSUANT TO M.G. L. CHAPTER 30 , SECTIONS 61 TO 62H INCLUSIVE (M.E. P .A. ) The project as described in the Notice of Intent for DEP File # 064-0272 is "categorically exempt" pursuant to the implementation of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act as adopted by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs . this project is "categorically exempt" as the Wetland thresholds established under 301 CMR 11 . 03 (3) of M.G.L. Ch. 30, sec . 61 to 62H inclusive, have not been exceeded. This finding is applicable only to activities proposed for the above referenced file number before the Department of Environmental Protection, Wetlands Division. It does not relieve the applicant from complying with additional M.E . P.A. requirements when applying for permits from other applicable departments or agencies . APPEAL RIGHTS AND TIME LIMITS This Superseding Order of Conditions is an action of the Department . If you are aggrieved by this action, you may request an adjudicatory hearing. A request for a hearing must be made in writing within and postmarked within ten (10) business days of the date of the date this order was issued. CONTENTS OF HEARING REQUEST Under 310 CMR 1 . 01 (6) (b) , the request must clearly and concisely state the facts which are grounds for the request, and the relief sought . Additionally, the request must state why the order is not consistent with applicable laws and regulations . FILING FEE AND ADDRESS The hearing request along with a valid check payable to the, Commonwealth of MAssachusetts in the amount of $100 . 00 must be mailed to: Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth Masters ' Lockbox P.O. Box 3584 Boston, MA 02241-3584 The request will be dismissed if the filing fee is not paid, unless the appellant is exempt or granted a waiver as described below. EXCEPTIONS The filing fee is not required if the appellant is a city or town (or municipal agency) , county, or district of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts , or a municipal housing authority. WAIVER The Department may waive the adjudicatory hearing filing fee for a person who shows that paying the fee will create an undue financial hardship. A person seeking a waiver must file, together with the hearing request as provided above, an affidavit setting forth the facts believed to support the claim of undue financial hardship. DATE: 05/03/100 TIME: 12:47 PM TO: Steven Zieff F tl (508) 6500526 PAGE: 002-003 ACORD1Y CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OSio3 20 0 PRODUCER (781)592-0083 (781)581-3940 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED ASA MATTER OF INFORMATION Swampscott Insurance Agency, Inc- ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR 90 Exchange Street ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Lynn, MA 01901-1475 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED Vinnin Square LLC INSURERA: Travelers Insurance Co 0 Weatherly Dr INSURER B: Salem, MA 01970 wsuRERD: INSURER D' INSURER E COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT.TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICYNUMBER DATE MMI DATE M D LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY 560 401X5028 10/30/1999 10/30/2000 EACH OCCORRENCE $ 100000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIRE DAMAGE(My one fire) S 5000 CLAIMS MACE ❑OCCUR MED EXP(Any.,�.palm) S 500 A PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 10000001 GENERAL AGGREGATE 5 100000 GENE AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS COMP/OP AGG $ 100000 17 POLICY PRP JECT F-1 LOC PRO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ANYAUTO (Eaeaitlenl) S ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY 5 SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per Persm) HIRED AUTOS BODILYINJ) $ NONOWNEDAUTOS ?er acadent) PROPERTVDAMAGE $ IPer ecaronp GARAGE UABILRY AUTOONLY EAACODENT 5 ANYAUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY AGO 5 EXCESSUABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE S 5 DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION S $ WORKERS COAENSATION AND TORY LIMITS ER EMPLOYERS'UABILRY E.L.EACH ACCIDENT S E.L DISEASE EA EMPLOYEE S E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 5 OTHER DESCRIPTION CF OPERATIDNSA-MATIONSNEHICLES)EXCLUVMS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPEaAL PROVISIONS scant Land/Real Estate Development Property Located CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADDITIONAL INSURED,INSURER LETTER' CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL City of Salem 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, Peter Strout--Bldg. Inspector BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTCE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY One Salem Green OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. Salem, MA 01970 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Edward Breed EMB " ACORD 25-S(7197) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 DATE: 05/03/100 TIME: 32:47 PM TO: Steven Zieff a +1 (506) 6500526 PAGE: 003-003 IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s),authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend,extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25-S(7/97) CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3'm FLOOR TEL: 978-745-9595 FAx:978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR THOMAS ST.PIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES/BUILDING COMMIISSIONER September 19, 2012 TGM Vinnin Square Apartments I Carol Way Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Mr. Morrison, This communication is not based on or related to any specific site inspection of the property known as "Vinnin Square Apartments", located at I Carol Way in Salem,Massachusetts for the purposes of this letter. At present time this Department to the best of its ability can reference no known outstanding Massachusetts State Building Code, Massachusetts Architectural Access Board or Zoning violations, as per review of our office documentation. Any questions please call our office at 978-745-9595. Respectfully, f%V�� Michael E. Lutrzykowski Local Building Inspector Cc: file OP-2002-0107 Building Permit No.: 497-2000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at --------------------Dwelling Type 0000 CAROL WAYin the CITY OF SALEM -____-________-___-----__-___----______--_ _ - _ Town/City Name Address IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 113 WEATHERLY DRIVE- SUITE 3 This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date ,/"�jlyuu Issued On:Thu Apr 11,2002 ------------------------------ --- - GecTMS®2002 Des Lauriers Municipal solutions,Inc. ------------------ - \ L , - 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE 497-2000 GIs#: 8087 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AkFMap 21 Block: CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0242 Permit Building Category: 105 New Five or morBUILDING PERMIT Permit# 497-2000 Project# JS-2001-1138. Est.Cost: $0.00 Fee: $0.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class:, Contractor: License: Use Group: ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES General Contractor- Salem#2092 Lot Size(sq.ft): 287496 Owner: Vinnin Square LLC Zoning: R3 Applicant: ARCH COMMUNITIES Units Gained:- Units Lost: AT. 0000 WEATHERLY DRIVE ISSUED ON. 30-Nov-2000 EXPIRES ON. 30-May-2001 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK. 113 Weatherly Drive-Suite 3-Glover Call for Perini 10cupy Construct 6-plex dwelling per plans submitted. Phase IV Vinnin Square. Costs&fees on permit#372-2000. P.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. - Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: -3-02 �j Meter: Footings: Ro z��/d Z Rough:J a-03v `_-� House# Foundation: Final og me: r /f/ Final: /�/�O Ru Yl Oi oy-Yot�- Fireplace/Chimney: Gas Fire Departme Board of Health Insulation: oil: tL Finale Finff�/��� Smoke: I ✓r� l/�/ol c� I} Treasury: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL N NY F ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2001-001262 30-Nov-00 01 $0.00 • GeoTMS®1995 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc. SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING FES 14 ATTORNEYS AT LAW C l i v 'r r 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' JOHN R SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI. JR. 978-744.0212 JOHN E. DARLING 781.681-2743 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI TELECOPIER February 9, 1998 978.741-4683 VIA TELECOPIER Gary M. Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal City of Salem One Salem Green, 2"d Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Decision of the Petition of Vinnin square, LLC. Dear Mr. Barrett: As you recall, the Zoning Board of Appeal at its December 17 , 1997 meeting granted variances and special permits to the Petitioner, Vinnin Square, LLC. , for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive. The Board unanimously voted to grant the relief requested by the Petitioner. I have enclosed a copy of the Petition which was filed with the City and a copy of the Decision for your convenience. The Decision contains a few typographical errors which are material in nature. In Paragraph 26 of the Decision there is an error in subparagraph B. The variance for maximum height of the building in stories should include the buildings on both Lots A and B as requested in the Petition on Page 1 of Schedule A, the last full paragraph. Also, in Paragraphs 12 and 17 of the Decision, the relief should be to Phase III and not Phase IV. I would request that an Amended Decision be filed reflecting these transcriptional errors. Thahk,W33LSo •�your attention to this matter. G' n 3 Sincerely, 1d30 9NlO111 '- dAtt ph C. Correnti orney for Vinnin Square, LLC. JCC: jaf Enclosures C"itp of •�• �ll�)!L �Tn}�pT'i� �Y�13TITP;II �U!)t)!TI�j ��'7°;73T.);I7lplli Ont*altm Ortrn (970') 7:x•959: 2st, 35J CONSTRUCTION CONTROL DOCUMINT Project 7i6c; Vinnin Square L.L.C. Due: 05/01/)0 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, --123 Weatherly Drive Project Location: 1 through 10. &. 12 Reliance Rnw, Salem, MA Scope,of Project: Now construction.:of:wood frame multi, 1p e single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. In tceordz-Ice vrirh rhe sixth edition vlusz;ics.; 5�:: Build.-Ig Crdc,73C C R. SECT ION 1, Andrew T. Zalewski Mass. Regis„ationNc-bcr 5092 M.Z.O. Architectural Group Inc. b:irg a r-gistcrad profcss;rnnl E.-,g>.�te_.(Arcn-.!=t hereby CE?TI$Y&2C I '-, � e p-Dar-d Ordirccdy supe-viscd the pmperarion of all desire otans, conpuzauons*,nd spccifiQtions conr_rrrng' O Entue? ojrcc f J Arthite sn! ( j S� czral ( J ,viccunirzl ( I Fire P79t:c6on ( J El:^ica! ( J OIIlR (pLClry��_ fnr the above na.:,cd pr�iect and:ha:ro the best of ry f„�row!;dgc,such plans, conpe�tiors z^.d sperifia;ions mr_e tha applicable provisions ofzl,.r sszc!:uscrs Ss:c Building Code,ail acceDtzblc eogtn-=nng przctic_s and all applicable laws for the propescd p:01-ct. r urlhemCre, I undcrszand and AGR_7Z Boat I shall perfom the ncee --prof_ssional soviets to de:rrr.ine that the above men:ior_d porticns of the work procc-d a accordance wi;,h ti.c enculrcnu zpproved forthe building pcttniL Upon conplr:ien ofncc work,'I shalt submit a rCAI report as to LnC szt:sfzctory completion of LhC above mentioned ponion of.�t work. $iz.natune and Seal of registered profclsionaL• \S`EPED ARai, ZA Fci P �z o a No.5092 W f LDEtd j ;o MASS. yR(IH of MPySr• Y n-. The MZO GROUP DPSICN'ERS rARCHITECTS gPLANNERS Letter Of Transmittal IN TNG 'M IQUF. TR DMON TO: Steven N.Zieff DATE: JOB NO. Real Estate Development May 1,2000 4771 6 Eden Road RE. Wayland,MA 01778- Vinnin Square/Salem,MA PHONE: (508)269-6900 WEARE SENDING YOU.• Z Attached Via BY HAND r-j Under Separate Cover Via , Samples Z Prints BOND Plans F� Specifications F-1 Copy of Letter E] Change Order Diskette E] Shop Drawings Z Other—See Below DATE COPIES NO. DESCRIPTION 05/01/00 1 Construction Control Document(original) 05/01/00 1 Construction Control Document (copy) 05/01/00 3 Title,A-1 thru A-29, G1, S-0 thru S-10, FP-0 thru FP-4, E-0 thru E-8 (stamped & signed for building department) 05/01/00 2 Title, A-1 thru A-29, G1, S-0 thru S-10, FP-0 thru FP-4,E-0 thru E-8 (FP & E drawings not stamped) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW.• Ej For your Approval Approved as Submitted E] Resubmit copies for-approval Z For your Use E] Approved as Noted F� Resubmit copies for"-aistribution Z As Requested F� Returned for Corrections F-1 Resubmit corrected prints For Review and Comment F� For Bids Due: REMARKSn. n UJ a WUJ �--1 C:) ,= C7 W4 -nm o I O UV)u- rnm N ?^ p frrim O tz rn .� VW `W3TVS 30 Alli tE -Z d Z- ku Opp? Anthony Perrotta COPY: SIGNED: 1d3G DNIOIMt MZO Group 92 Montvale Avenue,Suite 2400 • Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180-3628 Voice: 781-279-4446 • Fax: 781-279-4448 • E-Mail: mzo@tiac.net • www.mzogroup.com Branch Office:P.O.Box 132• Peaks Island,Maine 04108 Voice: 207-766-9714 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once 0&—Ox�A of Salem, �ttssadjusetts Pottrd of Av 'al J! l DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held December 17,1997 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Richard Dionne and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, is requesting Variances from maximum height of building, two principal buildings on a lot, maximum height of fence/boundary walls,minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum dimensions of parking stall width, maximum width of entrance and exit drives, setback to parking area & Special 'Permits for parking on adjacent lot and new condominiums for the property located at Carol Way & Weatherly Drive. The .provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is app-licatEbet -this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which`pfq—vidBs asefoilows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in his OrdinanRe , the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure Rio con'Mtiq�s set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alteVi�tiorrZ and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for clfnges, 'Anlargbment, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, s{frructure�, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page two I. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship. financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans. makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Petitioner was represented by Attorney .ioseph Correnti of Serifini, Serifini & Darling. 63 Federal Street. Salem. 2 . The requested relief consists of several variances and Special Permits for the final phase (Phase IV) of construction of The Village at Vinnin Square, a residential development. 3. The Village project commenced in the 1980 ' s and the developers, the Zieff family, has been involved with the project since 1983. 4 . The entire Village project, including Phase IV, consists of over 48 acres and will leave 516 residential units when completed. The original pians for the entire project at its inception, called for approximately 550 units. 5 . Phase IV of the Village project will consist of 178 residential units and parking over three (31 lots covering ten (10) acres. 6 . The three lots of Phase IV are unique in size and shape and the land has peculiar topography and consists of large areas of ledge and rock outcropping and large areas of wetlands. 7. The property on which the Village sits also has a large pond and has large differences in land variations. S. The developers concerned public discussions of the plans for construction of Phase IV of the Village project in ;larch 1997 at an Open House, and the official Planning Board process of site plan review began in April 1997. 9. The developers and the trustees of the Condominium Associations for Phase i, ii and !Ii of the Village met Over several months to discuss the plans for Phase IV, and an agreement was reached between the developer and the Trustees of Phase 1. II, and !II of the Village with respect to the plan and petition submitted to the Board. 10. The agreement between the Trustees and the developer was the result of months of negotiations and the plans and petition as submitted to the Board incorporated amendments suggested by the Trustees and other residents of the Village relating to traffic flow, improvements of recreational facilities and parking among other things. 11 . Attorney George W. Atkins of Salem, representing the Trustees of Phase 1 . •-r r Villa r_ __ , and iii G♦ the Village Spoke in favor Of the petition and pians as submitted as it incorporated matters which were the subject of negotiations. 12 . The Trustees of Phase I and ii Of the Village unanimously endorsed the petition and plans. and four Of five trustees of Phase IV Of the Village approved of the plan and petition. VW OW31VS 30 ,kill 03AI333N S£ Z d Z- Ow 001 1d30ON1011H DECiS i'O iv vc THE PEIliluo OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL, PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE page three 13. Several homeowners at the Village spoke in favor of the petition. 14. August Miller, 70 Weatherly Drive, Chairman of the Trustees' negotiating team, spoke in favor of the plan citing significant changes made to the plans to address concerns about traffic flow, the number of buildings proposed and entrance problems. Tests performed by the developer to address concerns about water pressure and sewage were also mentioned. 15 . The original plans for Phase IV of the Village called for four (4) buildings which was reduced to three (3) in the plans submitted. 16. The proposed plan has allowed for approximately 70% open space calculations over the effected three lots. 17. Several homeowners and a Trustee of Phase IV of the Village spoke in opposition to the plans and petition citing concerns for traffic flow, property value, architectural design, sidewalk accessibilitv and other matters. 18. The proposed Phase IV of the Village project must still undergo site plan review before the Planning Board, and Beth Debski, Assistant Citv Planner, stated that traffic flow concerns, utility and architectural design issues were subject to review and approval by the Planning Board. 19 . Lot D2 as reflected on the plans will consist of a landscaped parking lot with 25 spaces being exclusively dedicated to a nursing home on abutting property and 38 spaces will be attributed to parking for building sited on Lot A of the plans. 20. Due to the existing ledge on the property, outcropping,topography of the land, existing pond and large wetlands, combined with the large differences in land elevations between the lots and odd shapes, the siting of buildings for Phase IV of the Village project is restricted. 21 . It was represented by counsel for the developer that they would accept as a condition of the requested relief that developer will use access to Loring Tower Road for a means of exit from the two buildings located on Lot B of the pians. 22. The height of the 6-plex existing in Phase I-III of the Village are approximately 40 feet above ground, and the height of the existing mid- rise in Phases I-III are approximately 66 feet above ground. 23. The proposed building on Lot B will be approximately 56 feet above ground. 24 . The proposed construction of Phase IV of the Village will complete construction of the project. 23. Because of the topography of the land, and in order to allow the developer to work with the natural topography of the land, some walls on the property may exceed six feet. 26 . The petitioner requested he following relief from the Zoning Ordinance; ,�. um-- - - ---- . �ots Ace__from_maximum_he ght-of building in feet with respect to lots A and B. B,—Varlance'"from' ma7imum-height 6f_bdilding in stories with respect to 1bt B� C. {`Variance-for'two;printipal"b6llding on one lot with respect to Liot^B' .._ .._...__ __.._ _ ._ . VW 'W31 30 A1Y) 03A133A SE -Z d Z- ANN float 1d30 JN1011 u May 11300 10: 312 Steven M. 2ieff 1-508-GSO-0526 p. 2 LPAGE: 002-003 DATE: 05/16/100 Lime: 10:12 Nig TO: st,.— 6i.Ef E +1 (508) 6500526 ACORQ. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE UA 05/03/2000 PRGDUCER -781592-0083 (73L)SBI-3940 � p ONFEAS NO RIO Ah UPONN TbLE CERTIflOATEION Swampscott Insurance Agency, Inc. HOLIER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR 90 Exchange Street ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Lynn. MA 01901-147S INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE E v VTnnin Square INSURENA: Travelers Insurance CO O Weatherly Or INPA 142: Salem, MA 01970 INSUHLRR MSURERU NEURERE: COVERAGES -THE PDUCIE90F MSURAPICE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TD THE MSURm NAMED ABOVE FOR THEF'OUCY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTW ITHBTAN DING ANY RF-0UIPBAFNT,TERMOR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESFECTTO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY I ISSUEDOR FPOUCIIES.AGGREGATELUTIHOM OREGATEUA6TSSFFORDEDHOWN MAY y"AVEBEENBY PAID CRLADAS. �ECFFCIALLTNETERMS,d01.U5KHlSPNBCONDRIONS OF 9UCN PE OF A1ElmAlICEPOIJOTNUMMR WR IMUS LIMITS IARIUfY 401XS028 10/30/1999 10/30/2000 rAci o=RRENt a 100 ERaA GENERALUASUIY PIREcWVAWE ".wi,c) f 5 MED EAP(MM yep 9Yl)wvs MAnE ❑ F; ,LAnVIN.uar s 100000 GENERALAGGREGATEPR cT6-OOMPAIPAGGREGATE UNIT APPUt6 PER: T �COj LOCILE waLmUTOVMEDAUT05 (PM N..') OULEDAUTOEAUTOS (RuOWNED AUTON "ROTERIYOAMAGE E PN xc�) AUTOCNLY.EAACODENT 6 OAMCE LMS MYXJTO OTHER THAN EAAW b AVTO 0,,: AM 6 EACH 011 PPfNCE 6 ExCE88L LJTY OCOVT ❑CW MS MALf POGFECATf $ E 6 OEOUCEEE E RET ENTIw S WOIIKEIID OOAFENEATgNAND x iOFW UMfi6 ER EEPLOVOWUADA.ITY O BE DETERMINED 05/16/2DOD 05/16/2001 E.L.LAOHA MNT E 500,0 A E.L DSEASE EA EMPLOYEE E 500,000 E.L.O6EA6E-POUL'KUMT L ODU OTHER OE6O6PnM OF WEAATON5LOGLTQIWEiNELFSe%C111 =J=ED-BY ZMGW5 NTAiP PIMpIB04S scant Land/Real Estate Development Property Located CERTIFICATE HOLDER AODRIONALN9IAED;NPAifiR LETrER. CANC'EL'LATION SHOULD ANTOF THE ABOVE DESCR®ED P%M88E CANCELLED 6EFORETNE EMMTICR DhTE THEAEOF,ni IESMNG COMPANY WLI,EMEAVMTO HM6. 10 OAYDWF ENNDVA70T CERT MYEH DERNANEOTOTi ", City of Sales gUr PAEue TD WJL6UW NOTICFSNALLIWO6ENDW,UWTIONOR LM&UTT Peter Strout--Bldg. Inspector one Salem Creen aP AnrIONOwaH TtE COMPANv,IrsAo21ra 6i REPREstTITATNES. Salem, MA 01970 AD:Nrn�RSNENrawvE Edward Bre EMB CAL, Ira SAIDGROGURRUMIHON ACO 25 T) DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page four 5,.4Va_riance_from_maximum height offences and/or boundary walls for lots A and B. - T_ E.LVariance-from minimum-lot area per dwelling units for lots A & B. F.iVariance from minimum widths of parking stalls in underground garages for-lots-A-&-B.-- G. or-lots-A &"B.--G. Variance'"from maximum widthsfof entrance and exit drives for lot A & B. H: -Variance-ftom`2-front setback requirement for parking areas. I Sp -Permit to allow parking on adjacent lot with respect to lots A and D2. (J. Special Permit to allow new condominiums. UOn the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants . Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0 to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: I. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes ordinances and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure VW •W31VS JD A112 7. Petitioner shall obtainaFr��P�`street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. SE :Z d. Z_ ON 0507 Id30 'JNIflTH DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL, PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page five 8 . Petition is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission have jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board for Site Plan Review and the Conservation Commission. Variance & Special Permit Granted December 17, 199, ,sem �c Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED .WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Date A U G 19 1999 1 hereby certify that 20 days have expired from the date this instrument was received, and that NO APPEAL has been filed in thisVW 3tAlt 1 office. / A True Copru� Z- XFi 07ATTEST:_CITY CLERK, Salem, Mass. S£ Z d :1d39 JNIO�tit1G Fy t' 4 SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING FEB 14 e93 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET CH', r SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 y JOHN R SERAFINI. SR, TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI. JR. 978-744-0212 JOHN E. DARLING 781-581-2743 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI TELECOPIER February 9 , 1998 978-741-4683 VIA TELECOPIER Gary M. Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal City of Salem One Salem Green, 2R' Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Decision of the Petition of Vinnin Square, LLC. Dear Mr. Barrett: As you recall, the Zoning Board of Appeal at its December 17 , 1997 meeting granted variances and special permits to the Petitioner, Vinnin Square, LLC. , for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive. The Board unanimously voted to grant the relief requested by the Petitioner. I have enclosed a copy of the Petition which was filed with the City and a copy of the Decision for your convenience. The Decision contains a few typographical errors which are material in nature. In Paragraph 26 of the Decision there is an error in subparagraph B. The variance for maximum height of the building in stories should include the buildings on both Lots A and B as requested in the Petition on Page 1 of Schedule A, the last full paragraph. Also, in Paragraphs 12 and 17 of the Decision, the relief should be to Phase III and not Phase IV. I would request that an Amended Decision be filed reflecting these transcriptional errors. Thah7 W",j3M-)W1`yo'ur attention to this matter. Sincerely, SE 1z d z- Ow oast ' )Att 1d30 9NIGiine Correnti orney for Vinnin Square, LLC. JCC: jaf Enclosures Tito of Salem, 'fHttssarllusrtts �Battra of �ppettl 4aM Fce IE h iy �6 '93 AMENDED DECISION DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held December 17, 1997 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Richard Dionne and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, is requesting a Variance from maximum height of building, two,' principal buildings on a lot, maximum height of fence/boundary walls, minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot area per dwelling unit,minimum dimensions of parking stall width, maximum width or entrance and exit drives, setback to parking area & Special Permits for parking on adjacent lot and new condominiums for the property located at Carol Way & Weatherly Drive. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the Citv's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. `dW `W31VS 3D AIM 03AI3338 SE Z d Z XVW On! 2cF3fl JNtQ3k(�� DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING VARI=.1dC= page PERMIT FOR THE PROPERT'i LOCATED AT CAROL wAY 6 'EATHcRLY D= page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance involve substantial hardship, financial Or otherwise, t0 the petitioner. C. Desirable relief nav be granted without substantial detriment t public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board Of Appeal , after careful consideration Of the evidence Or and after viewing the Plans, makes the following findings of fact: I . Petitioner was represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti of Serif" Serifini S Darling, 63 Federal Street , Salem. 2. The requested relief consists of several variances and Special ? for the final phase (Phase IV) of construction of The Village at Square, a residential development. 3 . The Village project commenced in the 1980's and the developers. Zieff family, has been involved with the project since 1953 . The entire Village project , including Phase IV, consists of over 48 acres and will leave 516 residential units when completed. T original plans for the entire project at its inception, called fr approximately 550 units. 5 . Phase IV of the Village oroject will consist of 1/S residential and parking over three (31 lots covering ten (10) acres. 6. The three lots of Phase 1: are unique in size and shape and the : has peculiar topography and consists of large areas of ledge and outcropping and large areas of wetlands . /. The property on which the Village sits also has a large pond and large differences in land variations . S . The developers Concerned public discussions Of the pians for Construction of Phase 1V Of Che Village project in March 1937, at Open House , and the official Planning Board process of site plan began in April 1991 . The developers and the trustees of the Condominium Associations f Phase 1 , ii and iii Or the +iilaage met over several months to dis the pians for Phase IV, and an agreement was reached between the I eveloper and the Trustees of Phase I , II , and III of the Village with respect to the plan and petition submitted to the Board. 10. The agreement between the Trustees and the developer was the res months of negotiations and the plans and petition as submitted c. Board incorporated amendments suggested b'y' the Trustees and othe'. residents of the Village relating to traffic flow, improvements c recreational facilities and parking among other things. 11 . Attornev George V. Atkins of Salem, representing the Trustees of I , II and III of the Village spoke in favor of the petition and VWW 'W31VS-4okl In as submitted as it incorporated matters whic;i were the subject o: negotiations . 03A13338 I,. The Trustees of Phase I and 11 of the Village unanimously Ell petition and plans , and four of five trustees of Phase IIIGL 'Chc SE -� C1 Z_ AVW pqp Village approved' of the Dian and petition . 1d3G JNtOltft£ . CECISidi: OF THE PET114VI, OF VL11011, SVUARC LLC REQUEST A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERh1IT FOR THE PRdPERTS' LCCAT'c"d AT CAROL wA!' AND I:EATHE3 DRIVE page three 13. Several homeowners at the Village sooke in favor of the petition 14 . August hliller, 10 »eatherly Drive, Chairman of the Trustees' negotiating team, spoke in favor of the plan citing significant made to the plans to address concerns about traffic flow, the nu buildings or000sed and entrance oroblems. Tests performed by th developer to address concerns about water pressure and sewage we also mentioned. 15. 'the original plans for Phase IV of the Village called for four buildings which was reduced to three (3) in the plans submitted. 16. The proposed plan has allowed for approximately 70% open space calculations over the effected three lots. IJ .' Several homeowners and a Trustee of Phase III of the Village spo opposition to the plans and petition citing concerns for traffic iiow, property value, architectural design, sidewalk accessibili and other matters. 15. The proposed Phase IV of the Village project must still undergo plan review before the Planning Board, and Beth Debski , Assistan City Planner , stated that traffic flow concerns, utility and architectural design issues were subject to review and approval the Plannin¢ Board. IS . Lot D2 as reflected on the plans will consist of a landscaped oa lot with 25 spaces being exclusively dedicated to a nursing home abutting property and 36 spaces will be attributed to parking fo building sited on Lot A of the plans. 20. Due to the existing_ ledge on the property, outcropping, topograph the land, existing pond and large wetlands, combined with the la: differences in land elevations between the lots and odd shapes, siting of buildings for Phase IV of the Village project is restr 21 . It was represented by counsel for the developer that they would as a condition of the requested relief that developer will use ac to Loring Tower Road for a means of exit from the two buildings on Lot B of the plans . 22. The height of the 6-DIEX existing in Phase I-III or the Village z approximateiv 40 feet above ground, and the height of the exists rise in Phases I-1I1 are approximatEly 66 feet above ground . 23. The proposed building on Lot B will bE approximately 56 feet abo round. 2-' . The proposed construction of Phase IV of the Village will complet construction of the project. 25. Because of the topography of the land, and in order to allow the developer tp mors: with the natural topography of the land, some on the property may exceed six feet. 26 . The petitioner requested he following relief from the Zoning Ordinance; _ Variance from maximum height of building in feet with respect to lots A and B. B. Variance from maxi i,-,.um height of building in stories with respect CO lot D and A. C. Variance for two principal building on one lot with respect to lot B. DECISION OF THE PETi TION OF ViP:N li< SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A 'VARIANCE b SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL NAY S WEATHERLY D= Page four D. Variance from maximum-1 height of fences and/or boundary walls "or A and B. E . Variance from minimum lot area per dwelling units for lots - S B. Variance from minimum widths of parking stalls in underground gara for lots A 6 B. G. Variance from maximum widths of entrance and exit drives for lot . H. Variance from 2 front setback requiremzrit for parking areas. I . Special Permit to allow parking on adjacent lot with respect to lc A and D2. J . Special Permit to allow new condominiums . On the basis of the above findings of fact , and on the evidence press at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows : I . Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3 . The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogatin the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. The Special Permit granted can be ranted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenier and welfare of the city' s inhabitants. Therefore , the Zoning Board of Apoeal unanimously, 5-D to grant the re requested, subject to the following conditions: I . Petitioner shall comoly with all city and state statutes , codes ordinances and regulations . ? . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer . 3 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke am. fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction . 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. o. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with existing structure . ? . Petiti}oi3e;{7-!$bail Obtain prooer street numbering from the City Of Sa S4 a {` display said number s0 as to be visible Vis or s, offdl.o and shall street . DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY 'LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page five S . Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having Jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board for Site Pian Review and the Conservation Commission. Variance & Special Permit Granted December 17, 1997 Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPT' OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the Citv Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner 's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Date A 111; 191999 I hereby certify that 20 days have expirod from the date this instrument was received, and that NO APPEAL has been filed in this office. A True Copym/ � ATTEST:_CITY CLERK, Salem, Maq/ /�� Ctu of LSalem, ussttcl .usiettso tc� �Saarb of �Fpeaf -2 38 REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE (date- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) A hearing on this petition was held on May 19, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Ronald Harrison. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner's Vinnin Square LLC, represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti requests to modify the decision of the petition date stamped December 30, 1997 for the property located at Carol Way &Weathery Drive. The provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which are applicable to the request modification to the Special Permits and Variances and Section 5-3 G) and Section 9-5, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are not generally affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district. REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF VINNIN SQUARE � F." SHL' (� 3S PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DIANE (dated- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This request comes to the Board following an agreement reached in a civil action in Essex Superior Court, C.A. No. 98-00838, brought by neighbors in the appeal of a decision of the Board granting certain variances and special permits to the owners of land known as Phase 4 in the Village of Vinnin Square. 2. The Board's decision was challenged by condominium owners based on objections to the traffic conditions and increased density likely to result from the planned improvements in Phase 4 at the Village at Vinnin Square. 3. Following extended discussions, the parties agree on their desire to modify the Board's decision by making the following specific changes; a. The maximum height of the buildings shall be as follows: Building A will be F.F.E.73, is 4 and % stories without an attic and will be 56' high. Building D will be F.F.E. 91 or lower, is 4 and % stories without an attic and will be 56' high. b. The principal buildings on Lot 1 shall be 16 townhouses, two 6-unit residential building, and one midrise building (Building D). c. The maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls shall not exceed 10 feet. d. The total number of units in Phase 4 shall not exceed 148 and shall be distributed as follows (1) on Lot 1, one midrise building with 60 units (Building D), 16 townhouses and two 6-unit residential buildings; (ii) on Lot 2, one midrise building with 60 units (Building A). e. The maximum width of entrance and exit drives shall not exceed 36 feet. f. The front setback for parking areas shall not be less than 2 feet from all lot lines and 5 feet from street lines (excluding parking along Weatherly Drive/America Way). 4. In addition to Mark Blair, the Ward Councillor, the following residents spoke in favor of the adoption of the proposed agreement in its entirety: Timothy Davem, Esq., Gardner Gould, Leon McDowell and Hal Rosenthal. REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIX (",_, -Z A " stamped Dec. 30, 1997) 14 page three 5. By written letter, the abutting owners of the Grosvenor Nursing Home objected to the proposed agreement via their attorney, Jeffrey Shribman, Edq. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve sustantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of this ordinance. 4. The modification requested can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously voted 5-0 to grant the request to modify the decision of Vinnin Square LLC, for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive date stamped Dec. 30, 1997. Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section Il, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of this decision, hearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. d, JUN 2 41999 Board of Appeal I hereby ww*0d m dips hwll Ii from the data thbt bMI " - -as noaiwd, and flat HO APPEAL ha bM i lied N thfa otfios. A True COPYLc ATTEST_CITY CLERK, Salem, Mass. '� f1lit of ` ttlem, [ttssttcljuse#ts °Q�.. Paurb of '�{peaf .TI DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC, REQUESTING A VARIaCE D FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Stephen Harris, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance to the minimum distance between buildings for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive R-3. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1.Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structures involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involve. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Attorney Joseph Correnti, of 63 Federal Street represented the petitioner's. 2. Attorney Tim Davern representing the abutters, voiced approval. 3. There was no opposition to the plan. 4. Petitioners previously had variances approved but have failed to ask for one last Variance for the minimum distance between buildings. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5 in favor, to grant the variances requested, subject to the following condition; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city,and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner is to obtain Building Permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Variance Granted _ October 20, 1999 Richard Dionne, Member Board of Appeal DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC. REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE R-3 page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal . Skills NOV 2 2 1999 1 AuaOy O11111*20 20 days have expired tam aha daft Oft ha6vmeM was received, wid that NO APPEAL has been flied in this office. A True Copy �J ATTEST—CITY CLERK, Salem, Mass. City of Salem ' �� Ward X94 v� t BUILDING DEPT. �� r � � �� . - >aLOU PLAY -2 P -2 31 ` R'CEIV-0 APPLICATION �r 'A I Y OF SAL-M. MA FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADbITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT•Applicant to complete all Items in sections:1, 11, Ill, IV, and 1X. J. AT(LOCATION) I I l 113 I,JP cT�Y J� 1)3 S '4uLQ td o13 al"cT T LOCATION OF BETWEEN C�6^! �I 0.L( AND BUILDING a srReen ZI 9(7 (CRLown SUBDIVISION1 u2 UI I 1qq�l Afr �llkl,�i� 5('/� nor ZI BLOCK ZL+T-_ slzE b. IL TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING.-All applicants complete Parts A - D 14RY A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D."PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOLITION"USE MOST RECENT USE 1 ®;.New Wading: Residential NonvraidentW. 2 ❑ Addttlon iu ms=deneal.enter numwt of new 12 ❑ One limey I S ❑ Amusement.reneatonal nousug unds added.d any,m pan D. 13) - 19 ❑ Chrurlt,IXter rNgipn 1319 mon IamtlY•Enter number I/1 20 ❑ Industrial 3 C1 Aareof was e bon(Sea 1 a0ore1 0l -�__ V 21 ❑ P d kv garage '. 4 ❑ Repau replacement 14 ❑ Trarnenl Intel.motel,or dormitory- 22-❑ Service ehlbn.Iapab garege Enter number of ones 5 Elwn-x v I#muadamey.,,cwdal,enw rwmber 23 ❑ Hosoilal=trtelilultonill of units m budding m Pan D. 13) 15 ❑ Garage 24 ❑ Office,bank Prolessonal 6 ❑ Moving(relocation) t6 ❑ Carpet {" n. I, 25 Q Public uglily. 7 ® Foundatnn only 17 ® ONer-Specify y7�N0 H�ln/ 26 ❑ School=library.other educational S.OWNERSHIP �"� � 27 ❑-Stores,.marnntle W 6rk r,9x- t:-w.{aLILQ 28 ❑ Tar*&W-en 6 Pnv4trton,eiiduaL corporaliorl,nonprofit / institution eta1- m� (714l7rj / 1319 ) 29 ❑ Other•Stoeeey 9 ❑ Public(Federal.Slate.or local government C.COST (Omit cents) :1 build' s ' rten - stinal odbge. parochial parki am 9,reMa rce building.oHbe building 10."`(ibst ot impro emend S '•ff'' '1('- lif/(/ at industrial pant IJ,ref' existing buildhng Is be'ag eherged.enter pidpdeed uss. - " / ,�',/�/(p(}}/'( ,ryes• //�Q in be above c but m(included / (N"+/'^'v' '`©I^ 0 L-111 01A 5 �. ;n the above cost {'4e a. Etectnol ( D r b. Plumbing_ rVI,I [` rr1I���/C1n..p� c. Heelirg,aicrorditloneg - wYOr'.��•7 rB�J `Q ��✓Tll��rolr O it. Other(eiwator,eta) 11. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT III: SELECTED_CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING -For new b s and additions, comple E L demolition, complete only Parts J 8 M, all others skip to IV E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRNCPAL TYPE OF{EATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGEDISPOSAL1. TYPE OF MECHANWAL 30-❑ Masmry(wall bearing) 35 Id Gas 40 ®..Public or prhzle company Will there be central at 31_.2 Wood name 36 ❑ OU 41 ❑ PrNate(septic tank eta) conditioning? 32 ❑ StnrLrzl steel 37 ❑ Electricity - - 44-[0 Yes 45 ❑ No H. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY 33 C] ReedIXced conctale 39 ❑ Coe( .. �1 - WW there by ttn eNaab!! 34 f-1 Other-SWdy 39 C] Oew-Specily 42 [Z Pt"hoorp&atebomliany 46 ❑ Yee-^ 47 ® No . 43 ❑ Private(well cistern) - . of Salem, ttsstttllusetfs F '!iLDiNG DEPT. tui MAY -2 P 2: 31 V5- date i OF SALEM..MA TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: Sir: The undersigned respectfully applies for a BUILDING LICENSE in the City of Salem . . . . . . GENERAL CONTRACTOR . . . . . . HOME BUILDER . . . . . . SPECIALTY CONTRACTOR . . . . . . Side Wall Installation & Related Work n . . . . . . Signs . . . . . . Minor Repairs . . . . . . Home Remodeling, Jobbing & Home Repairs . . . . . . Roofing, Including Installation & Repair Work . . . . . . BUILDING MOVER . . . . . . BUILDING WRECKER - DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR 7"S �P,VGc� Name (Please Print) Home Address H6inpJ Phone 5.05 (015 `fes ot WkA Busi ss Name ddress ns Number Bus. one Approved by: " "Z6L 1� /v 1 L24' 2' Building Inspector App is Sig ure Fee: �� . (f ltv of "5ttlem, {` assar 62#f8 curb of ezd REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE (date- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) A hearing on this petition was held on May 19, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Ronald Harrison. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner's Vinnin Square LLC, represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti requests to modify the decision of the petition date stamped December 30, 1997 for the property located at Carol Way &Weathery Drive. The provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which are applicable to the request modification to the Special Permits and Variances and Section 5-3 Q) and Section 9-5, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 911, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are not generally affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district. 3$ REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC,, O,EPiTY�E PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIRfE�(d2ted- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially„derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This request comes to the Board following an agreement reached in a civil action in Essex Superior Court, C.A. No. 98-00838, brought by neighbors in the appeal of a decision of the Board granting certain variances and special permits to the owners of land known as Phase 4 in the Village of Vinnin Square. 2. The Board's decision was challenged by condominium owners based on objections to the traffic conditions and increased density likely to result from the planned improvements in Phase 4 at the Village at Vinnin Square. 3. Following extended discussions, the parties agree on their desire to modify the Board's decision by making the following specific changes; a. The maximum height of the buildings shall be as follows: Building A will be F.F.E.73, is 4 and '/3 stories without an attic and will be 56' high. Building D will be F.F.E. 91 or lower, is 4 and ''/: stories without an attic and will be 56' high. b. The principal buildings on Lot 1 shall be 16 townhouses, two 6-unit residential building, and one midrise building (Building D). c. The maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls shall not exceed 10 feet. d. The total number of units in Phase 4 shall not exceed 148 and shall be distributed as - follows (1) on Lot 1, one midrise building with 60 units (Building D), 16 townhouses and two 6-unit residential buildings; (ii) on Lot 2, one midrise building with 60 units (Building A). e. The maximum width of entrance and exit drives shall not exceed 36 feet. f. The front setback for parking areas shall not be less than 2 feet from all lot lines and 5 feet from street lines (excluding parking along Weatherly Drive/America Way). 4. In addition to Mark Blair, the Ward Councillor, the following residents spoke in favor of the adoption of the proposed agreement in its entirety: Timothy Davem, Esq., Gardner Gould, Leon McDowell and Hal Rosenthal. t. REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE (date stamped Dec. 30, 1997) page three 5. By written letter, the abutting owners of the Grosvenor Nursing Home objected to the proposed agreement via their attorney, Jeffrey Shribman, Edq. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve sustantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of this ordinance. 4. The modification requested can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously voted 5-0 to grant the request to modify the decision of Vinnin Square LLC, for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive date stamped Dec. 30, 1997. /Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section II, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of this decision, hearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal y %\AtUJ• pE\ � ( itu of §31EM, AttssttrljusPtts Poarb of �d ralrN REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE (date- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) A hearing on this petition was held on May 19, 1999 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Michael Ward, Stephen Buczko and Ronald Harrison. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner's Vinnin Square LLC, represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti requests to modify the decision of the petition date stamped December 30, 1997 for the property located at Carol Way &Weathery Drive. The provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which are applicable to the request modification to the Special Permits and Variances and Section 5-3 G) and Section 9-5, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are not generally affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, or structures in the same district. w`�" REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLCOFITYLE p 11 1,3 PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRI`R dafed- stamped Dec. 30, 1997) page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. This request comes to the Board following an agreement reached in a civil action in Essex Superior Court, C.A. No. 98-0083B, brought by neighbors in the appeal of a decision of the Board granting certain variances and special permits to the owners of land known as Phase 4 in the Village of Vinnin Square. 2. The Board's decision was challenged by condominium owners based on objections to the traffic conditions and increased density likely to result from the planned improvements in Phase 4 at the Village at Vinnin Square. 3. Following extended discussions, the parties agree on their desire to modify the Board's decision by making the following specific changes; a. The maximum height of the buildings shall be as follows: Building A will be F.F.E.73, is 4 and '/z stories without an attic and will be 56' high. Building D will be F.F.E. 91 or lower, is 4 and 1/2 stories without an attic and will be 56' high. b. The principal buildings on Lot 1 shall be 16 townhouses, two 6-unit residential building, and one midrise building (Building D). c. The maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls shall not exceed 10 feet. d. The total number of units in Phase 4 shall not exceed 148 and shall be distributed as follows (1) on Lot 1, one midrise building with 60 units (Building D), 16 townhouses and two 6-unit residential buildings; (ii) on Lot 2, one midrise building with 60 units (Building A). e. The maximum width of entrance and exit drives shall not exceed 36 feet. f. The front setback for parking areas shall not be less than 2 feet from all lot lines and 5 feet from street lines (excluding parking along Weatherly Drive/America Way). 4. In addition to Mark Blair, the Ward Councillor, the following residents spoke in favor of the adoption of the proposed agreement in its entirety: Timothy Davem, Esq., Gardner Gould, Leon McDowell and Hal Rosenthal. REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE (date stamped Dec. 30, 1997) page three 5. By written letter, the abutting owners of the Grosvenor Nursing Home objected to the proposed agreement via their attorney, Jeffrey Shribman, Edq. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve sustantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of this ordinance. 4. The modification requested can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously voted 5-0 to grant the request to modify the decision of Vinnin Square LLC, for the property located at Carol Way and Weatherly Drive date stamped Dec. 30, 1997. Nina Cohen, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section II, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of this decision, hearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal (91t� of SZ11em, gnesndjijults s Potts of &A�ml X11 2 :54 hi "Sit, LE J. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC R_EQUE_STING A VARIANCES AND T C SPECIAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AAROL WAY-&�WEATHERLI' DRIVE_R=3, A hearing on this petition was held December 17,1997 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Richard Dionne and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, is requesting Variances from maximum height of building, two principal buildings on a lot, maximum height of fence/boundary walls,minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum lot area per dwelling unit, minimum dimensions of parking stall width, maximum width of entrance and exit drives, setback to parking area & Special Permits for parking on adjacent lot and new condominiums for the property located at Carol Way & Weatherly Drive. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page two B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Petitioner was represented by Attorney Joseph Correnti of Serifini , Serifini & Darling, 63 Federal Street, Salem. 2. The requested relief consists of several variances and Special Permits for the final phase (Phase IV) of construction of The Village at Vinnin Square, a residential development. 3. The Village project commenced in the 1980's and the developers , the Zieff family, has been involved with the project since 1983. 4 . The entire Village project, including Phase IV, consists of over 48 acres and will leave 516 residential units when completed. The original plans for the entire project at its inception, called for approximately 550 units. 5. Phase IV of the Village project will consist of 178 residential units and parking over three (3) lots covering ten (10) acres. 6 . The three lots of Phase IV are unique in size and shape and the land has peculiar topography and consists of large areas of ledge and rock outcropping and large areas of wetlands . 7. The property on which the Village sits also has a large pond and has I arge differences in land variations. S. The developers concerned public discussions of the pians for construction of Phase IV of the Village project in March 1997 at an Open House, and the official Planning Board process of site plan review began in April 1997. 9 . The developers and the trustees of the Condominium Associations for Phase I , iI and III of the Village met over several months to discuss the plans for Phase IV, and an agreement was reached between the developer and the Trustees of Phase I, II, and III of the Village with respect to the plan and petition submitted to the Board. 10. The agreement between the Trustees and the developer was the result of months of negotiations and the plans and petition as submitted to the Board incorporated amendments suggested by the Trustees and other residents of the Village relating to traffic flow, improvements of recreational facilities and parking among other things. 11 . Attorney George W. Atkins of Salem, representing the Trustees of Phase I , II, and III of the 'tillage spoke in favor of the petition and plans as submitted as it incorporated matters which were the subject of negotiations . 12 . The Trustees of Phase I and II of the Village unanimously endbria the petition and plans, and four of five trustees of Phase IV .of.`th�-,, Village approved of the pian and petition. = O ori ni 7 T '12� to DECISTOil OF THE PETT-TOiv OF VINNIN SQUARE LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY AND WEATHERLY DRIVE page three 13. Several homeowners at the Village spoke in favor of the petition. 14 . August Miller, 70 Weatherly Drive, Chairman of the Trustees' negotiating team, spoke in favor of the plan citing significant changes made to the pians to address concerns about traffic flow, the number of buildings proposed and entrance problems. Tests performed by the developer to address concerns about water pressure and sewage were also mentioned. 15. The original pians for Phase IV of the Village called for four (4) buildings which was reduced to three (3) in the pians submitted. 16. The proposed plan has allowed for approximately 70% open space calculations over the effected three lots. 17. Several homeowners and a Trustee of Phase IV of the Village spoke in opposition to the plans and petition citing concerns for traffic flow, property value, architectural design, sidewalk accessibility and other matters. 18. The proposed Phase IV of the Village project must still undergo site pian review before the Planning Board, and Beth Debski, Assistant City Planner, stated that traffic flow concerns, utility and architectural design issues were subject to review and approval by the Planning Board. 19 . Lot D2 as reflected on the plans will consist of a landscaped parking lot with 25 spaces being exclusively dedicated to a nursing home on abutting property and 38 spaces will be attributed to parking for building sited on Lot A of the plans . 20. Due to the existing ledge on the property, outcropping,topography of the land, existing pond and large wetlands, combined with the large differences in land elevations between the lots and odd shapes, the siting of buildings for Phase IV of the Village project is restricted. 21 . It was represented by counsel for the developer that they would accept as a condition of the requested relief that developer will use access to Loring Tower Road for a means of exit from the two buildings located on Lot B of the pians. 22. The height of the 6-plex existing in Phase I-III of the Village are approximately 40 feet above ground, and the height of the existing mid- rise in Phases I-III are approximately 66 feet above ground. 23 . The proposed building on Lot B will be approximately 56 feet above ground. 24 . The proposed construction of Phase IV of the Village will complete construction of the project. 25. Because of the topography of the land, and in order to allow the developer to work with the natural topography of the land, some walls on the property may exceed six feet. 26. The petitioner requested he following relief from the Zoning Ordinance; A. Variance from maximum height of building in feet with respect to lots A and B. B. Variance from maximum height of building in stories with respect to lot B. C. Variance for two principal building on one lot with respect to lot B. 55146 h 1 �s, DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page four D. Variance from maximum height of fences and/or boundary walls for lots A and B. E. Variance from minimum lot area per dwelling units for lots A & B. F. Variance from minimum widths of parking stalls in underground garages for lots A & B. G. Variance from maximum widths of entrance and exit drives for lot A & B. H. Variance from 2 front setback requirement for parking areas. I . Special Permit to allow parking on adjacent lot with respect to lots A and D2. J. Special Permit to allow new condominiums. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions do exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 4 . The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal unanimously, 5-0 to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: I . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes ordinances and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the pians and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . Petitioner shall obtain building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 7 . P titror�g !.5h?11 obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem S A sors; off„dg and shall display said number so as to be visible from e street. Z6+ �.g SS Z QE 330 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF VINNIN SQUARE, LLC REQUESTING A VARIANCE & SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT CAROL WAY & WEATHERLY DRIVE page five S. Petition is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission have jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board for Site Plan Review and the Conservation Commission. Variance & Special Permit Granted December 17, 1997 n J Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED .WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of M,GL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the Citv Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n o ' m _ O C[ C C=) ^. n N o-, in �� 3 T D N CO+ i