Loading...
224 CANAL STREET - BUILDING JACKET �. 229 CANAL STREET Jtp LJ v JJ a;i CJI elf ofttlem, � ussttcllusetts �Boara of (Avm l DECISION ON THE PETITION OF_DONNA_R. MATCZAK FOR A r2NAL STRE SPECIAL PERMIT AT4 CAET ,,(R-2) A hearing on this petition was held September 11 , 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in-the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to allow construction of a second story to this single family dwelling which is located in an R-2 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconfdrming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing.nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The petitioner and her family have been residents of this address for many years and wish to remain in this home. 2. All abutters of the premises were notified by mail of this petition before the Board. 3. The house is presently four rooms on one floor and the petitioner wants to add bedrooms and a bath to the second level. 4. The petitioners premises is the only one family home in the immediate neighborhood. All other homes are multi-dwelling units. 5. The petitioner is in fact improving her property and thus the value of her neighbor's property with this proposea addition, which proposal will cost approximately $65,000. 6. That petitioner has licensed contractors to do the work and that there is no neighborhood opposition. t DECISION ON THE PETITION OF DONNA R. MATCZAK FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 224 CANAL STREET, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use and can be granted in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and without derogating from its intent or the public good. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to allow the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. That the proposed construction be per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. That all exterior finishes be compatible with the existing structure. 4. That a legal building permit be obtained. 5. That a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. 6. That all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be strictly adhered to. Special Permit Granted September 11 , 1991 4949 oseph C. Correnti, Secretary, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK �T' J Appeal from this decision,H any,shall be made pursuant to section 17 O! the Iwlass.General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days .s after the date of filing of this decision In the office of the City Clerk. Pursucnt'o l,A.+-s. General Laws,Chapter 808,section 11, the Variance n or 9peciai Permit rranted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the ys have decision, to-rtn' th ahas certification filed, or that, if suchof the city Clerk aappeal an alhnsbeen elapsed and no appeal v _ filed,that i+ has been dismisses or denied Is recorded in the South Essex ds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Registry ii Dee utu Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. aiv z BOARD OF APPFJ1l: _ PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KIM100 4Y ORMCOM MAYM 130 WwuNGtM SMELT• M J MA0ACH Sk-1-s 01970 741.MUSAS"•PAZ;M7404W APPLICATION FOR THE REPAIR. RENOVATION CONSTRUCTION DEMOLITION, OR CHANGE OF USE OR OCCUPANCY FOR ANY EXISTING STRUCTURE OR BUILDING 1.0 SITE INFORMATION location Name: Building: Property 0aL4 CANAL— s� Properly is kxx W in a:Conservation Area YM Historic District YIN 2.0 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 2.t Owner ofLand "DON NA R._MATC—z K Name: Address: der 4 C A rJ ,�L 1 Telephone: C q 7 7 4 S- - 0 ( � 5 3.0 COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR WORK IN MU811W BUILDINGS ONLY Addition oNew Renovation Number of Stories Change in Use o2 Demolition Approximate year of Area per floor (at) construction or renovation of existing building (� Bdet Description of Proposed Work: n+' '\5 � R<!�p(ac , nJ-' SJ I ,) — - -- Mail Permit to: - - - -- What is the current use of the Building? Material of Building? it dwelling.how many units? will the Building Conform to Law? Asbestos? Architect's Name Address and Phone ( ) Mechanic's Name Address and Phone Constriction Supervisors License 0 HIC Registration# Estimated Cost of?roles O Permit Fee Calculation Permit Fes i Estimated Cost X$7/51000 Residential Estimated Cost X$41/51000 Commerclal------.__-- An Additional $5.00 is added as an Administrable charge. Make sure that all fields are property and legibly written to avoid delays in processing. The undersigned does hereby apply for a Building Permit to build to the above stated �- specifications. Signed under penalty of perjury — Oats VI JS N O � •` Olt ems+ 3 O O 3 y a izqq The Commonwealth of Massachusetts TFt'nVE13 ' Board of Building Regulations and Standardsl;,l;PECTIbNAL ER,4 OF Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR SALEM Building Permit Application To Construct, Repair, Renovate o �pprAASR3 etisttYar 2011 One- or Two-Family Dwelling This Section For Offic I Use Only Building Permit Number: Date/Applied: I Building Official(Print Name) Signature SECTION 1: SITE INFORMATION 1.1 Pro eI/ty A�lddre/ss�: / 1.2 Assessors Map& Parcel Numbers 20 L la Is this an accepted street?yes no Map Number Parcel Nurhber 1.3 Zoning Information: 1.4 Property Dimensions: Zoning District Proposed Use Lot Area(sq ft) Frontage(ft) 1.5 Building Setbacks(ft) Front Yard Side Yards Rear Yard Required Provided Required Provided Required Provided 1.6 Water Supply: (M.G.L c.40,§54) 1.7 Flood Zone Information: 1.8 Sewage Disposal System: Public ❑ Private❑ Zone: _ Outside Flood Zone?Check if yes❑ Municipal❑ On site disposal system ❑ SECTION 2: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP' 2-bo°nna R� atczak Salem MA 01970 Name(Print) Ci ,State,ZIP 224 Canal st 9783376826 D.matczak0614@comcast.net No.and Street Telephone Email Address SECTION 3:DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK'(check all that apply) New Construction)g Existing Building❑ Owner-Occupied ❑ 1 Repairs(s) ❑ Alteration(s) ❑ 1 Addition ❑ Demolition ❑ Accessory Bldg. ❑ Number of Units I Other ❑ Specify: Brief Descri tion of Pr osed Work': 'Q SECTION 4: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Item Estimated Costs: Official Use Only Labor and Materials) I.,P, Q (D Building $ .4 J 1. Building Permit Fee: $ Indicate how fee is determined: ❑ Standard City/Town Application Fee 2. Electrical $ I C✓�� a ❑ Total Project Cost' (Item 6)x multiplier x 3. Plumbing $ 2. Other Fees: $ �) ��� 4. Mechanical (HVAC) $ List: �L3/ 5. Mechanical (Fire $ Suppression) Total All Fees: $ 6. Total Project Cost: $ 7(42-1 - Check No. Check Amount: Cash Amount: 0 Paid in Full 0 Outstanding Balance Due: SECTION 5: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5.1 Construction Supervisor License(CSL) C S_ I OQ 0 r W nA I 1O Q y. �j r un-Q , License Number v Expiration bate Narh6 of CSL Holder I+ 1 n n ry I n �� List CSL Type(see below) No.and Street 1 Type Description N .Read .i n M o U Unrestricted(Buildings up to 35,000 cu.ft. Restricted 1&2 Family City/Town,State,ZIP M Masonry Dwelling RC Roofing Covering ` WS Window and Siding SF Solid Fuel Burning Appliances I Insulation Telephone Email address D I Demolition 5.2 Registered Home Im rovement Contractor(HIC) ( s I I(,� Vlvlr-w �,Ol1F D-2V210PP, jlc X C Registration Number Expiration Date HIC company Name or HIC Registrant Narpe W n �U lfi So 110 a,,Jd Street C' O 'J V �A � ' t^ � —. 7--Q �ddrhs N 1 �( V tU Emailaddr ss� �r"1 City/Town, State,ZIP Telephone SECTION 6: WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT(M.G.L.c. 152. § 25C(6)) Workers Compensation Insurance affidavit must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the Issuance of the building permit. Signed Affidavit Attached? Yes .......... No ........... ❑ SECTION 7a: OWNER AUTHORIZATION TO BE COMPLETED WHEN OWNER'S AGENT OR CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR BUILDING PERMIT I, as Owner of the subject property,hereby authorize Vivint Solar to act on my behalf,in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application. Donna R Matczak 1/26/16 Print Owner's Name(Electronic Signature) Date SECTION 7b: OWNEW OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DECLARATION By entering my name below, I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and understanding. Yea 1) aw b Print Owner's or uthorized Agent�(Electronic Signature) Date NOTES: I. An Owner who obtains a building permit to do his/her own work, or an owner who hires an unregistered contractor (not registered in the Home Improvement Contractor(HIC)Program),will not have access to the arbitration program or guaranty fund under M.G.L. c. 142A.Other important information on the HIC Program can be found at www.mass. og v/oca Information on the Construction Supervisor License can be found at www.mass.gov/d s 2. When substantial work is planned,provide the information below: Total floor area(sq. ft.) (including garage,finished basement/attics, decks or porch) Gross living area(sq. ft.) Habitable room count Number of fireplaces Number of bedrooms Number of bathrooms Number of half/baths Type of heating system Number of decks/porches Type of cooling system Enclosed Open 3. "Total Project Square Footage"may be substituted for"Total Project Cost" EcolibriumSolar Layout r r r r Skirt c Coupling End Coupling 0 Clamp End Clamp Note: If the total width of a continuous array exceeds 35 ft, break array to allow for thermal expansion and contraction. See Installation Guide for details. S North Row Extension Warning: PV Modules may need to be shifted with respect to roof trusses to comply with ® Bonding Jumper maximum allowable overhang. 224 Canal St, Salem MA 01970 U o �ymw LLUEZ PV SYSTEM SIZE: I <E 4.680 kW DC I c"No U I N J 45'OF i"PVC CONDUIT FROM JUNCTION BOX TO ELEC PANEL L I I O JUNCTION BOX ATTACHED T ARRAY USING EC0 HARDWARE TO V INTERCONNECTION POINT, C KEEP JUNCTION BOX OFF ROOF INVERTER,ANSI METER LOCATION, LOCKABLE DISCONNECT SWITCH, I ry &UTILITY METER LOCATION 0 •o ; I I •o a I I pP, O n m � m ( I 0 o � a Z 0 Q z E 4 � Z W 9 I I rc ¢ y > (18)JKM280P80 MODULE � J w m 3 z z � SHEET NAME: -_-_-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-- W J d SHEET -�� NUMBER' PV SYSTEM SITE PLAN SCALE: Custom d 0 0 m N O 3 P 2 Z L) m ooO .�N.p Oy III u30 pA 5^ CZ N m� 0 G rn0 m? r � m � C A I m A 0 o n $m y �ti r mo D m z m A a Km zm INSTALLER: IMITSOLAR Matczak Residence `, n m m ROOF m m INSTALLER NUMBER:78]].404.4120 e�M nl s o l a r 22m Canal 19 py L,O p MA LICENSE:MANIC AOB48 Salem,MA Ot9]0 PLAN > DRAWN BY:BB I AR 4783040 Last Modified 1/14/2016 UTILITY ACCOUNT NUMBER:6297383009 CLAMP MOUNTING SEALING C PV3.0 DETAIL WASHER LOWER 'U) SUPPORT �Ao� ® N �z Ll 2 Yry-Z PV MODULES, TYP. MOUNT "`""` N nO OF COMP SHINGLE ROOF, FLASHING PARALLEL TO ROOF PLANE / 2 1/2" MIN u 5116"0 x 4 1/2" L MINIMUM STAINLESS PV ARRAY TYP. ELEVATION STEEL LAG SCREW NOT TO SCALE TORQUE=1332 @-Ibs0 CLAMP ATTACHMENT U) • NOT TO SCALE a •G ; CLAMP+ m ATTACHMENT CANTELEVER U4 OR LESS oG E COUPLING L=PERMITTED CLAMP ECO SPACING SEE CODE COMPLIANT COMPATIBLE LETTER FOR MAX ALLOWABLE MODULE CLAMP SPACING. d. mn PERMITTED COUPLING CLAMP+ o m o CLAMP ATTACHMENT SPACING CLAMP m w ¢ COUPLING PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE m z w .. C w z w m Z F F j 3 h h ¢ z z � SHEET t7 -7 H NAME: L=PORTRAIT U) Z CLAMP SPACING ~ Q ECO p COMPATIBLE SHEET L=LANDSCAPE MODULE PV SYSTEM MOUNTING DETAIL NUMBER: CLAMP SPACING MODULES IN PORTRAIT/LANDSCAPE NOT TO SCALE 1 M NOT TO SCALE a. O Conduit and Conductor Schedule DC Safety Switch Notes: Solar PV System AC Point of Connection Tag Description Wire Gauge #of Conductors Conduit Type Conduit Size AO OUPU cunenl Rated for max operating condition of inverter Accoding to Not' i9,r9 AmPa 1 Solar Edge Cable 10 AWG 2(V+,V-) N/A-Free Air N/A-Free Air 6e09(ap1) U NEC 690.35 compliant NominalAc vona ' 1 Bare Copper Ground(EGC/GEC) 6AWG 1 N/A-Free Air NIA-Free Air ge zao vans U R 2 THWN-2 10 AWG 2(V+,V-) PVC V. 'opens all ungrounded conductors THIS PANEL FEU BV MULTIPLE SOURCES 2 THWN-2-Ground BAWG 1 PVC p (uTILnV AND BoIAR) 3 THAN-2 10AWG 3(1-1-1,1-1-2,1-N) PVC r Notes: SE380OA-US-UInverter Specs: -cn_mw 3 THWN-2-Ground BAWG 1 PVC 1 Wire size and breaker calculations dependent upon CEC Efficiency 98% yU2<2 Inverter Continuous Maximum Output. tL i Example:SE38000A-US-U Max Output-16A AC Operating Voltage 240 V mr <20A. Therefore a 20A solar breaker will be needed for Continuous Max Output 16 A No each SE380OA-US-U inverter. Wire Gauge should also DC Maximum Input Current 13 A CION g be determined with 16A Max for each inverter. ae Solar Ed Ci timizer Specs: HU ALL CONDUCTORS Co P300 DC Input Power 30OW SHALL BE COPPER DC Max Input Voltage 8-48V DC Max Input Current 12.5A Design Conditions: DC Max Output Current 15A ASHRAE 2013 Max String Rating 525OW L Highest Monthly 2%DB Design Temp 35.6`C. Module Specs: (0 18 PV MODULES PER INVERTER=4680 WATTS STC Lowest Min.Mean Extreme DB -17°C VOC Temp coefficient VPC JKM260P-60 Q 1 STRING OF 18 PV MODULES Short Circuit Current(Isc) 9.00A I System Specs: Open Circuit Voltage(Voc) 37.8V a Operating Current(Imp) 8.47A � Max DC Voltage 500V Operating Voltage(Vmp) 30.7V •C e JUNCTION Box Nominal DC 0 eratin Volta a 350V Max Series Fuse Ratin 15A 0 0 ® ° ° ° a WITHIRRENERVIBLE P 9 9 9 OHOUNOSPLICE Max.DC Current per String 15A STC Rating(Pmax) 260W •`>` Nominal AC Current 16A Power Tolerance -0/+3% r 9 CONFORMS TO ANSI C12.1-2008 a - LI Lz N A SouREGCE `P300 OPTIMIZERS SOLIREOGE M g �I BEYO]ALBA n B, 1 INVERTER' y ICU Q Z to 2Q sa„d.onoux3taB Zto souREocE 30ArzaVJ uxwsEo to oc SAFETYNEMU TWA w w w m M' SWITCH OR EQUIVALENT aj to ; 4 3 to z o o SHEET EXISTING NAME g 240V/100AAC w Z C LOAD-CENTER -3 Q 2 VISIBLE WITH 1-2 POLE 20A LOCKABLE 3 KNIFE AC SOLAR BREAKER OISCONNECT SHEET NUMBER: O W THIS ROOF SECTION NOT USED.USAGE WAS REACHED WITH OTHER SECTIONS. m U o m I y�mw N�AQm IL E + � Yny2 (p"00 Nlk a 4 y j 4 4 y� Y p _ '1!♦�Y 1xr g m p o D ' � Q � � 9 P� ra. ��. ♦ i.T'� > � E m W W Z m rs /fid a < � z oim ¢ � SHEET NAME: ZU C7 — C7 r= w O SHEET NABLE TO FIT THE REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER: ROOF SECTION USAGE CONSTRAINT NUMBER OF MODULES ON THIS SECTION COMP.SHINGL Ti 3096.9%CUSTOMER USAGE OFFSET 18 MOD MODULESLEE " _]7 o V on e solar 3301 North Thanksgiving Way, Suite 500 Structural Group Lehi, UT 84043 P: (801) 234-7050 Scott E. Wyssling, PE Senior Manager of Engineering scott.wyssling@vivintsolai com January 15, 2016 Mr. Dan Rock, Project Manager Vivint Solar 3301 North Thanksgiving Way, Suite 500 Lehi, UT 84043 Re: Structural Engineering Services Piccirillo Residence 488 Howellton Rd, Orange CT S-4782540 5.72 kW Dear Mr. Rock: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the following information regarding solar panel installation on the roof of the above referenced home: 1. Site Visit/Verification Form prepared by a Vivint Solar representative identifying specific site information including size and spacing of members for the existing roof structure. 2. Design drawings of the proposed system including a site plan, roof plan and connection details for the solar panels. This information was prepared by the Design Group and will be utilized for approval and construction of the proposed system. 3. Photovoltaic Rooftop Solar System Permit Submittal identifying design parameters for the solar system. 4. Photographs of the interior and exterior of the roof system identifying existing structural members and their conditions. Based on the above information we have evaluated the structural capacity of the existing roof system to support the additional loads imposed by the solar panels and have the following comments related to our review and evaluation: Description of Residence: The existing residence is typical wood framing construction with the roof system consisting of the following: • Roof Sections (1, 2, and 3): Roof section is composed of 2x6 dimensional lumber at 16" on center. The attic space is unfinished and photos indicate that there was free access to visually inspect the size and condition of the roof members. All wood material utilized for the roof system is assumed to be Hem-Fir #2 or better with standard construction components. The existing roofing material consists of composite shingle. Our review of the photos of the exterior roof does not indicate any signs of settlement or misalignment caused by overstressed underlying members. Stability Evaluation: A. Wind Uplift Loading 1. Refer to attached MSI calculations sheet for ASCE/SEI 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, wind speed of 100 mph based on Exposure Category B and 25 degree roof slopes on the dwelling areas. Snow load is 30 PSF for Exposure B, Zone 1 per(ASCE/SEI 7-10). 2. Total area subject to wind uplift is calculated for the Interior, Edge and Corner Zones of the dwelling. vuvont. solar 01 Page 2 of 2 B. Loading Criteria 10 PSF = Dead Load (roofing/framing) 30 PSF = Live Load (non reducable) 3 PSF = Dead Load (solar panels/mounting hardware) Total Dead Load= 13 PSF The above values are within acceptable limits of recognized industry standards for similar structures. Analysis performed on the existing roof structure utilizing the above loading criteria indicates that the existing members will support the additional panel loading without damage, if installed correctly. C. Roof Structure Capacity 1. The photographs provided of the attic space and roof rafters show that the framing is in good condition with no visible signs of damage caused by prior overstressing. D. Solar Panel Anchorage 1. The solar panels shall be mounted in accordance with the most recent "Mounting System Inc. Installation Manual", which can be found on the Mounting System Inc. website (usa.mounting- systems.info/en/solar-mounting-systems-company). If during solar panel installation, the roof framing members appear unstable or deflect non-uniformly, our office should be notified before proceeding with the installation. 2. The solar panels are 1 '/;• thick and mounted 4 ''/2" off the roof for a total height off the existing roof of 6". At no time will the panels be mounted higher than 6" above the existing plane of the roof. 3. Maximum allowable pullout per lag screw is 235 Ibs/inch of penetration as identified in the Nation Design Standards (NDS) of timber construction specifications for Hem-Fir (North Lumber) assumed. Based on our evaluation, the pullout value, utilizing a penetration depth of 2 ''/2", is less than the maximum allowable per connection and therefore is adequate. 4. Roof Sections (1, 2, and 3): Considering the roof slopes, the size, spacing, condition of the roof, the panel supports shall be placed at and attached no greater than every fourth roof member as panels are installed perpendicular across members and no greater than the panel length when installed parallel to the members (portrait). No panel supports spacing shall be greater than four (4) spaces or 64" o/c, whichever is less. 5. Panel support connections shall be staggered to distribute load to adjacent members. Based on the above evaluation, with appropriate panel anchors being utilized the roof system will adequately support the additional loading imposed by the solar panels. This evaluation is in conformance with current industry standards and practices and the information supplied to us at the time of this report. Should you have any questions regarding the above or if you require further information do not hesitate to contact me. � GONNf V truly yours, 90••.LICEN '•6�p` Scott E. Wyssling, P °�SSiI°,,,II CT License No. 3 3 vivin . solar