The URL can be used to link to this page

105 CANAL STREET - BUILDING JACKET IGS c, S '+` rsup�rTabs 90%LargerLabolAma 5 M EA6 KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED No. 10301 FIMPEMM imLaEcram woewusA GET ORGAN VFD 9 SMEAD.COM Certificate Number: B-16-33 Permit Number: B-16-33 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that theBuilding.. .. located at .............................................................................................. ....................................................................................... Building Type ..........................................................................105 CANAL STREET.......................................................................... in the .....................................City of Salem Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Sidelines Restaurant SIDE LINES RESTAURANT This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires ................................Not Applicabk............._....._......_. unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued on: Thursday, March 17, 2016 ��•�OND1Tq�� VSQVE AD CITY OF SALEM i� 40 CJS-� L ! pec No.3aLf9l City of Salem Ward APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT-Applicant to complete all items in sections:1, ll, Ill, IV, and IX. I. AT(LOCATION) -I�� C/�i�i7,L �'S� y%% DISTRICT LOCATION (NO.) ISTREen OF BETWEEN AND BUILDING (CROW STREETI (CROW STREET, LOT .a SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE - 11. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A -D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOLITION'USE MOST RECENT USE 1 ❑ New building Residential Nonreudental 2 ❑ Addition(It residential.enter numberol new 12 ❑ One family 18 ❑ Amusement.recreational -, housing units added,i/any,in part D,13) 19 ❑ Ch=h,other religious 13 ❑ Two or more family-Enter number 3 ❑Afferation(See 2 above/ of units...................._............... 20 ❑ Industrial .- 21 ❑ Parking garage 4 ❑ Repair repacemem 14 ❑ Transient hotel,motel,or dormitory- 22 ❑ Service station,repair garage ..___... Enter number of units ................ :.: 5 E] Wrecking(If multifamily residential,enter number 23 ❑ Hospital,institutional of units in building in Part D. 13) 15 L ' Garane 24 ❑ Office.bank,professional 6 ❑ Moving(relocation) 16 ❑ Carbon 25 ❑ Public utility 26 ❑ School,library.other eduratimal 7 F1 Fountlatbn only 17 ❑ Other-Specity 27 ❑ Stores,mercantile _. EL OWNERSHIP 28 ❑ Tanks,towers 8 ❑Private(individual,corporation.nonprofit 29 ❑ Other-Specify - - institution.etc.) 9 ❑ Public(Federal,Sate,or local government C.COST (Omit cents) Nonresoemial-Describe in detail proposed use of buildings,e.g..food processing plant machine shop,Laundry building at hospital,elementary school,secondary school,curage, 10. Cost of improvement ................._. parochial school,parking garage for department store.rental office busdhg,office bulling "'-""-"""""""""""""' $- at industrial plant.If use of existing building is being changed,enter proposed use- To be installed but not included in the above cost ?9rE: 1NTF_./LIO+L a- Electrical..............................._.......................................... b. Plumbing.._............_..............._........................._............ 4,cnp � r C. Heating,air conditioning................_........................... it. Other(elevator,etc.)......................_............................. 11. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT $ - III. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING -For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E -L;demolition, complete only Parts J& M, all others skip to IV E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF HEATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL I. TYPE OF MECHANICAL 30 ❑ Masonry(wall bearing) 35 dGas 40 ❑ Public or private company Will there be central air 31 Wood hams 36 ❑ Oil 41 ❑ Private(septic tank,etc.) condhioning7 32 ❑ Structural steel 37 ❑ Electricity 44 ElVes 45 ❑ No 33 ❑ Reinforced Concrete 38 ❑ Coal H. TYPE F WATER SUPPLY Will there by an elevator? 34 C] Other-Specify 39 C] Other-Specify 42 Public or private company q6 C] Yes 47 NO 43 [:] Private(well,cistern) J.DIMENSIONS / M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: 4a Number of stories - 49. Tobi square feet of Poor area, Has Approval from Historical Commission been received all floors.°a_d 00 a teno..........................__.......__. for any structure over fifty(50)years? Yes_ No— dimensions —f d " 50. Total land area.sq.ft ........... ......................_..._....... � /l�r✓� 5: Dig Safe Number . K.NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES Pest Control: 5t. Enclosed......................................................_..._............ HAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED? 52. Outdoors......................................_......................._.__ /12 ---- . :�'- --- Yes No L RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY '7JJ Water: Electric: Gas: Full.................................._....... Sewer: sl. Number of DOCUMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED oamrooms BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Historic District? Yes_ No (If yes,please enclose documentation from Hist Com.) Conservation Area? Yes_ No`�(If yes,please enclose Order of Conditions) Has Fire Prevention approved and stamped plans or applications? Yes r� No_. Is property located in the S.R.A. district? Yes_ Nol Comply with Zoning? Yes (/ NO_ (If no,enclose Board of Appeal decision) Is lot grandfathered? Yes_ Nov (If yes,submit documentationlf no,submit Board of Appeal decision) If new construction,has the proper Routing Slip been enclosed? Yes_ No_ Is Architectural Access Board approval required? Yes_ NoZ (If yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts State Contractor License # (D 3 Salem License# Home Improvement Contractor# Homeowners Exempt form(if applicable) Yes_ No_ CONSTRUCTION TO BE COMMENCED WITHIN SIX(6)MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: If an extension is necessary,please submit in writing to the Inspector of Buildings. V. IDENTIFICATION - To be completed by all applicants (,lama Mailing address-Number,street,cdV,and state LP Code Tel.No. Owner or a 7-Zl../\- Lessee l IiY�SI�� )N C; y\J FG71r(J��lliY7.�1N1 �-�/Y114 ✓ /-/ .5r,3-Zi 14-, z. j�Jv G I NG Contractor !uL.• License No. 3. Argwteot or wear I hereby certify that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his authorized a ent and we agree to conform to ail applicable laws of this jurisdiction. bViature of ap `, Address Application date a • 3 Z) r/7 AnL.Fy n1 —7 EYE� / '',tv/ ,r DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE 4VL VALIDATION Building �7 FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY F permit number - - �_. - Use Group Building t Permit ISSUed 19 Fire Grading Building1�� Live Loading _ tparmit Fee $ _ _ 'S- Occupancy Load ' < ':Certificate of Occupancy $ Approved by: Drain Tile $ 77- -f-Plan Review Fee $ TITLE J°.`. "NOTES AND Data•(For department use) e (n — t !] s� S (/ I lit Itis C,rL f e �n Ilo--t, ri PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO: p�d DATE MAILED: Construction to be started by. Completed by: VI ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES DISTRICT USE FRONT YARD SIDE YARD SIDE YARD - �- - REAR YARD NOTES ---SITE OR PLOT PLAN •For Applicant Use __ o N D 'ANGELO INC TEL No .5085883462 Aug 17 .94 8: 13 No .001 P .01 • • ' • DELOPS, Inc. 321 Manley Street West Bridgewater, MA 02379-9987 Pnone(508)583-2116 FAX(508)588-3462 j i FAX COVER SHEET To: :70oN SMNNiNC-r:S Date: _ 8/17/94 i Company: _e4,0& Time: FAX#: From: R,"r' Atextension: 2/19 Pages in this transmission including cover: Z ii Message: f 1LD -A=MOV O^s,_�,e�r� 11 ,l RE.V)11ED XS ftk2WM ON -rWE, SITE M YOU HAUL ,nw aVADW5 _ D 'ANGELO INC TEL No .5085883462 Aug 17 ,94 8 : 13 No .001 P .02 'L A•�y;pR�, PWAC¢iNM1IM1V. PAIL':r l�'i(,.� e9a TPasN F.�csteE 7«' I irk ep r h1 C.flr' e 8`001 3a'Ol"W - .t' - - - E OOe W 01' W SRs ~ I 4 O 9'-Je' I ,r '•• �ti m W I - 4w N n sg s• EN y( ,S' Ia• IB• 1a 19' . rYP. STALL STRIPES ^I •IF CURB el e—l-lN PROPOSED 24' K 160' O 1 INGRESS/,ZCRESS EASEMEN I'M WAS 1 , AD NEW CEND PROPOSEI PROPOSED ASPHALT 1 C I ASPNAIT PANN PAMNC e . .....NEW SEC IS' WIDE SEMI 1 _ SE•£A ZASEMI 4T N 1 I .. .. � I. FENCE. F ,' C 'S O C' t. � 1.5' 1j.5'i ..•.. . . TNA7 1$ i I 1 n a_ V+o TVP. CURB ED I N' i 1 ..� iv .'• Tr MGONAL STALL EXIST. WOOD PENCEN0, 0 SEE �y . NOTES C 1-yS;r41� .� FfiEr,nR - PICK-UP WINDOW I ENLARGEMENT•' e I .'v[IUA' ra m NG ' FA 1'•FT• 19• ,f' 10'. SS-i' p-d AREA(�s�,/ PIG Z 'v TNTC N=0 EDGE WALK IS' WIDE CRI OP ALEA SEWER E 1 ASCMEM P. L Jj I 431 rFl ;� ....... F— NEW OHrvE API BEGIN f' NIP.M WOOD( ( CUR N t3 43� t G (INCE, 100' LONG 56N. r J CARRV0O7 1 ^�!. r :.v+. rIN. -. Ira. E.-STING CURBm- PARNIIIO "HII Ir w - Wi '."I Ibinr Q� T 'I ni v: ubl':1 I�rPun. (7 P)usa N6T/p�w6u-v 1'Ia er Y.11' 1'li pu EKISUNG PAYED � V/`Y /T*j/F x SOMALI( TO BL REMOVED AND RLP-<-0 r„ STANDARDS. f'ONr, P1?7, r•n /n/ HAMEL & NEWTON ADJUSTERS FEB - 9 201 INSURANCE ADJUSTING or SALEM PO Box 68 • Woonsocket, RI 02895 CSNCOLLECTOR Tel: 401-597-5830 • Fax: 401-597-5833 FORM OF NOTICE OF CASUALTY LOSS TO BUILDING UNDER MASS. GEN. LAWS, CH. 139, SEC. 3B TO: Building Commissioner/ TO: Board of Health/ TO: Fire Department/ Inspector of Buildings Board of Selectmen Arson Squad Salem Town Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01979 RE—INSURED: Salem Sports Pub, Inc. d/b/a Sidelines PROPERTY ADDRESS: 105 Canal Street, Salem, MA 01970 POLICY#: PAC8782308 LOSS: 1/30/10 CLAIM#: 525536029 ADJUSTER'S FILE NO. 91041 Claim has been made involving loss, damage or destruction of the above captioned property, which may either exceed $1,000.00 or cause Mass. Gen. Laws, Chapter 143, Section 6 to be applicable. If any notice under Mass. Gen. Laws, Ch. 139, Sec. 3B is appropriate, please direct it to the attention of the writer and include a reference to the captioned Insured, location and policy number, date of loss and claim or file number. /1l/ Douglas H. Newton, Adjuster 2/3/10 On this date, I caused copies of this notice to be sent to the persons named above at the addresses indicated on the above by first class mail. l Douglas H. Newton, Adjuster 2/3/10 r= C OP-2002-0065 Building Permit No.: 459-2001 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT This is to Certify that the Restaurant located at --- --- ---- Dwelling Type 0105 CANAL STREET in the CITY OF SALEM ------------------------------------- ------ --- -- - ---------------------- Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Sidelines Sports Bar& Grill This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires ------------------------------------------ unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date - ------------------------ --------------------- Issued --------------- - -Issued On:Fri Feb 8,2002 OF 0V -- - ---------------- GeoTMS®2002 Des Lauders Municipal solutions,Inc. --...__------------------_.------__-_--------------- -------------------- ----------- h I J j i 0105 CANAL STREET 459-2001 GIs#: 408 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map: 33 Block: CITY OF SALEM Lot: 0132 Permit: Building- Category. 437 Nonresidential:ad BUILDING PERMIT Permit# , 459-2001 Project# JS-2002-0991 Est. Cost:, $8,000.00 Fee: $85.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const. Class: Contractor: License: Use Group: Konstantinos Hantzis Minor Repairs Only- Salem#2180 or Size(sq. ft.): 27149 Owner: NSG REALTY TRUST Zoning: " -. B4 .. ' Applicant: Konstantinos Hantzis Units Gained: Units Lost AT: 0105 CANAL STREET ISSUED ON. 31-Dec-2001 EXPIRES ON: 01-Jul-2002 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: y Minor renovations for restaurant fit up per plans submitted. T.J.S. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings Underground: Service: Meter: �I I Footings: 111 Foundation: Rough:%-/8 �'Z House Rough Frame: / — eZ 3— 4 a Final: a a '02 C91� �, Fireplace/Chimney: Insulation: - Gas,, Fire Depart cot Board of Health Final: 12,9_ t�'�- (/ Treasury: 113 to Z. � 'nmoke• Excavation: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM ON VIOLATION OF N OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. l9C Signature. ✓" Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2002-001058 19-Dec-01 1945 $85.00 lMPORTAN?=: f rr in, upm comp!e lon c? ti...;o:, pl2:"O_S'. Gal! 745-9595 Ext. 385 / GeoTMS®2002 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. V3QVf AD CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT G�PY Fee Due"$10.00 ----------- City of Salem, Massachusetts ck* Cash FIRE DEPARTMENT-FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Rec'd b 48 Lafayette Sheet Salem,Massachusetts 01970 (508)745-7777 `D ) Office Hours:(8-9 AM.)and(1-2 P.M.) PERMIT TO INSTALL • FIRE ALARM DEVICES Permit is hereby granted to install approved fire aI m devices.All equipment and wiring are subject to approval of Salem Electrical Dept Location: D Citi„ D, �- Owner. S �>_/._i7 i i Q Installer: d2— i� !> .. License* 3 Ze?6 26- Installer shall n required, as list note special equipment ed on reverse side. UPON COMPLETION,THE INSTALLER SHALL REQUEST AN APPOINTMENT AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO TEST,BE PRESENT FOR THE TEST,AND SIGN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. � (Signature of Firere OX/iia . n1J O�C�tc�'f (TitleF r._.. Date of expiration: (THIS PERMIT MUST BE CONSPICUOUSLY POSTED UPON THE PREMISES) Pone xelF(Rw.04/92) (OVER) r. f✓ f o CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR i SALEM, MA 01970 TEL. (978) 745-9595 EXT. 380 FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. - PETER STROUT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY MAYOR January 24,2002 105 Canal Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: For Occupying Land To Whom it May Concern: This letter is for direct T.V. or whichever company is installing the television communication for this establishment. The occupancy land should be around 88-100 people. This amount is approximate but will be close to our final numbers. If you have any further questions,I can be reached at 978-745-9595 x 386. Sincerely, Frank DiPaolo Local Building Inspector Fit- /C. O. COPY CERTIFI _ E 0 CUPANCY 1,' 3 53 CITY OF SALEM lissued.1 (orG"gq "t SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 al De L DATE SEPTEMBER 21 19 99 PERMIT NO. 656-1999 APPLICANT TW GERLAND ADDRESS 11 MANATAUG TRAIL 1145 (NO.) (STREET) (CONTR'S LICENSE) CIT. MARBLEHEAD STATE MAZIPCODE 01945 TEL.No. 781-639-4115 PERMITTO ALTERATIONRESTAURANT NUMBER OF 1 ( ) STORY DWELLING UNITS (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USE) AT`(LOCATION) :0105 CANAL STREETI DIISTRICT .-(NO.)—-_(STREET) BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION MAP 33 LOT 01 J.'-BLOCK LSIZE OT 0027149 SGS FT BUILDING IS TO BE - FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BY FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: INTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO RESTAURANT. TJS AREA ORQ PER _ VOLUME ESTIMATEDCOST$ 20 (CUBIC/SQUARE FEET) OWNER GOTTA HAVE IT LLC ' BUILDING DEP ADDRESS 105 CANAL STREET BY s • f P'tP,MIT i4U5T BE OBTAINED EEFCP.- _EGIN:: I .G � Jnf PPLICATION !1uST BE SUBMITTED IN DU?LIC:,: , ONE SET TO EE FILED WITH THE VDEPARTMENT) LAI;NII:G DEP .RT14Eh:T, AND ONE SET (EEARING T'rE APPROVAL OF THE PLAI;N1tJG TO BE FILED WITH THE BUILDII:G It:SPECTOR. 7 T 7 - q / Location, Ownership, and Detail Must be Correct , Complete 'very Sign.E or fv and Legible. Se �. parate . rplication Required Application for Permit to Erect a Sign Salem, 'f,assachusetts� 197 TO THE BuILDINC I.eSPECTOR: lies for permit to Erect, Alter, Repair The undersigned hereby app a p — a sign on the following described building: Location and No. /0,�4-�/.U�TG. S%- Zoning/District tdame of Property OwnerlZ2 (/T Name of Sian Owner 12�Z Z�7 AIT dk� Address If Owner is a corporate body name of responsible officer Name of Licensed Sign Erector Salem Address 575D.4�7�� l'iI�Aol,)dZ License No. jrd_Fioor Use of Building: 1st Floor /Py Lith Floor 2nd Floor Type of Sion: ✓ ?urface, __ Right Angles to cuildina , k.Free Standing, Other (specify) Height: --S 01-1411y Sign Materials. 4�y/-f/y � f� `U�/�� Sian Area SF Sign Dimensions �laa .47ff/ � SaN:' -- Sign Area / � SF Existing Signs : Surface: —Sign Area SF Richt Angles : ii Si n Area � 7 9 SF Free-Standing 86 �/X ��Sign Area SF Other " Sign Area SF Signs to be Removed: Type FT Frontage: Building FT Property Name and Address of Signature of Owner Insurance Company: ' Signature of pavers Authorized Representative ' � sti L-o �9wivaJ Address r� 7 Estimated Cost G c�3S 2 of New Work}�8�'�� Telephone J`>�0 APPROVALS: Signature of Property Owner Super Salem Plan ing Department nten ent o St ets Historica Lor.:nission PLAN oF-_LOT COLOR Alto LOCATION W1 au I Loi uc ; L�lf'� G� 511011 SIGN SIZE, PLICATION FOR PERh'::T FOR Show Location of Prescnt• 51rucluro LOCATION OF OTHER SIGNS AND BUILDING ENTRANCE REPAIRS AND and Signs ILTLRATlONS, , DEMOLITIONS ...CLASS IIUILDINC , ------- LOCATION ---LOCATION i! ......:... .......................... ; ..._.............Ward..............._... . .............................................. I �- --1 1 • • 1 • ..... ........... • CONDITIONS ................ . . .... . .. . ............................... .......... ................................................................. ............................................. ....... .. ...:.................... - - - - - - _ - - - - - - Pcrmit Grarntcd .....�� ........ 19. / � � / '�: ``a iJ i � � s � '. � �P.1!YI�I T i I 'R r ` r .r � � ��: , -�.tY. , ;, ,,,., �J +•�` -"�� llrllll��'� � _ . C� i .V��k�,�+ai'�R''yas{ , �y n ,p, ,�: r a1 .,.. �. , � _� � .,> � �'"�'�, �1.Q0.` ,x * i e aY. ..::: �...,�.•,: T,.'��'3r.,�v�.. 1 �� ' � �� A � � f`� 1 Sk y I . r� k-+ a�.��,r'�+R fi.Y+. }a ..t �r n .r k� t'€�I "�`"`",�,�s�-.-' S,* �Y' rv�l�,rb t^, " i rig, r w" ,;,,�. i 1.. 'a,bk�y v` Y. � yy VE $Y� a m A a f i 'FM��N?+. y.p �. d 3 �� k � .I A 7y� S�I pi P��a mut® yy lAa JIMEW d aolossaich shage o sandwich shops® E-� ToP &/ Our - �Lkr- pelioerzy were �'Kk5eW'16 �cb c6Py �-N66�0 1� �LIJICA SAOPS W 4(1-c �Cr7r✓-c 007(/Ne G� C+IlnnwC IMPACT SIF:NS.INC 95 DAI ION nv[NUE POISYIEID.Mn 0110I �\ AIJ-E99.OJBP bB00d5B)Y6 vnx a i J nn}Oi)Jn INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED 1113 CLEVELAND AVE. • LOVELAND • COLORADO • 90537• [303]663-0660 * FAX: [303] 993-9979 October 24, 1959 o N — o cn City of Salem �=''"n co Salem, Massachusetts = Rrrri c o c RE: Pizza Hut a 105 Canal Street J y , Salem, MA To Whom It May Concern: I.C.M. has complied with all the recommendations and requirements set forth by our structural engineer, John Gilowitz, on the above referenced project. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Thank you. Sincerely, J)SSTA E CONSTRUCTION T INCORPORATED . Coeesident /as STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. 167A Washington Street • Norwell, Massachusetts 02061 (617) 878-0135 FAX (617) 878-0838 7� October 18, 1989 'w o a City of Salem m Building Department r"`2 m o One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 v mn o= Attn: Mr. Dave Harris Re: Construction Control for Pizza Hut 105 Canal Street, Salem, MA Dear Mr. Harris: I certify that I shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to determine that the structural portions of the work are proceeding in accordance' with the documents approved for the building permit and shall be responsible for the following as specified in Section 127. 2. 2: 1. Review of structural shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Special structural engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. Pursuant to Section 127. 2. 3, I shall submit periodically, a progress report together with pertinent comments to the Salem Building Inspector. Upon completion of the work, I shall submit a final report as to the satisfactory completion and readiness of the structural portions of the project for occupancy. (i Signature Subscribed and sworn to befora. me this _ day C72m/�f/ 19 769Y 'A OF Mgss�,`e II SEI 10 18B �6 JOHN'W. yob � QUEEN H ' 28011' s, 1990 STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. Queen Executive Center 18 Oct. 19897 9115 167A Washington St., Rt. 53 `'o"`T NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 Pizza Hut LOCITION (617) 878.0135 Salem, MA. I .C.M. oNrI C.M. on Ply a Hut.- TO --i- —' wennute it-�cfi. nYaf �_ Aho 105 Canal Street Sunny & Clear Nnn —�2.---- rr11'.SrNT IT I'llCED �(7 Salem, MA 01970 Wil Lassel - I .Crahl.1 --- -- _ -----�-- km G [O John Gilewicz - S„;;'?. '�I!tc. rn THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED� fn rte+ On October 13, . I inspected the wood framing for the above referenced project. All wood framing headers, and . roof trusses were installed in accordance with contract drawings. The dormer framing along the south wall of the building was not framed in accordance with the roof framing plan. In order to correct the problem a 2 X 10 must be laid flat across the sheathing above the roof trusses directly beneath the hip rafters . Vertical studs should then be placed directly above the trusses and framed under the hip rafter in order to transfer any vertical load to the trusses. These vertical studs should be fastened to the hip rafter with tie down clips. -- -- J� � � � ) 1, 0111 � ni coPlEs To Mr. Dave Harris � J ( —1�� t7JI � )1 I-1 (no)_ � l SIGNED INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED 1113 CLEVELAND AVE. • LOVELAND • COLORADO • 80537• [303]893-0880 • FAX: [303] 883-8979 October 12, 1989 j C Mr. Dave Harris — City of Salem Salem, MA r"D _y:rR '.ta1 RE: Pizza Hut Mn 105 Canal Street Salem, MA a Dear Mr. Harris: I.C.M. is ready to begin the framing and drywall at the above referenced store. We have met all specifications and codes that Pizza Hut adheres to. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, INTER TE ONSTRUCTION MANA ENT C PORATED ian C e Vice Pr dent /ss RIIIIh0.1 lfll,.\,'•i:.;liiIiileii i.l liln:l in•ni!ii i'IVIIYf Illil lulI I 11111!/)1,4110 STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. °n'F Oct. 2, 1989 9115 Queen Executive Center O ecr 167A Washington St., Rt. 53 NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 Pizza Hut I OCATION (617) 878-0135 Salem CON IRnCTOR OWNER Interstate Construction Mgt. I.C.M. Pizza Hut - -- - ---- -- - c/o Pizza Hut ---- wrnnleR rrmR. mat AM 105 Canal Street Sunny & Clear 6 °atl:00 PM Salem, MA John Gilewicz - SA. , Inc. c �m r Wil Lassel-&- Ken 1!1'cqoa 1-1-IE4,l_I.0Nn rvG wns nlon=l). Several Workmen teo Fn yy = V On-September _29, _I inspected_ the slab reinforcementon the above- -_referenced project.__Approximately__ 3/_4_of the reinforcement was installed. reinforcement was in conformance_.-with the contract drawings. The following___recommendations were made to Ken _Price and should be followed __before___and-_during-place-ment-of- the__conccete_ for the slab___ install_ debar_._chairs -_to_ raise steelreinforcement to the proper___ -- -- - -- . height; - - - --- ---- ------- all-s-tab_dow_e.ls.__must---be_.-bent_ down into the slab and tied to the _ _slab__r_e.inforcement._-_ -_-_ COPIES TO-Mr. Dave Harris -- — ��jD M�dl Salem Building Department SIGNED STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. DATri Queen Executive Center September 28, 198, 9115 167A Washington St., Rt. 53 --P — _.1 _. -._--------.___----- ROTErr NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 Pizza Hut ------— -- - -- ocnTloN (617) 878.0135 Salem, MA to Interstate Construction Mgt. I.C.M. P3+'+zza Hifit -WE R �rGr.tf' C/O P-12Zd -ITU t--- nmEAM 105 Canal Street ^rn _ °at c-� Nnn Salem, PRESENTAT SITE 'E Co Z c-� John Gilewicz, S.E,. -IYc. Will Lassel, I.C._�-�. .nr= THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Several Workmen c� On September 25, I inspected theformworkand reinforc_ing__for._the_----- interior grade beams__at the above-referenced__project.__-_Approximately_.____ 2/3 of the interior grade beams were formed-with-the reinforcement_-in__ - place. All work appears_ to be in conformance ._.with - the_. contract_...... drawings and revised details____ _. COPIES To Mr.—Dave.Harris Salem Building Dept. °N Citp of 6alem, AaggacbUg¢ttg �P j3ublic propertp Mepartment Nuilbing Mepartment One 9palem green 745-9595 GCxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 2, 1989 Mr. John Gilewica, S.E. Structures Engineering, Inc. 167A Washington Street, Rt. 53 Norwell, MA. 02061 Dear Mr. Gilewic::: Thank you for your field report dated September, 28, 1989. Unfortunately, the report was unsigned. Please sign the enclose report and return it to me. Sincerely, / i David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/jmh t Professional Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958 - 1986 OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970 ° �6�l7A BRADFORD & WEED 1885 - 1972 PLOT PIAN OF LAND LOCATED IN l'Y1JJ M��[� 9 c � ��% nSf Le9ladc Ca Z 0 A cn 3' 73 fT ,n: n�J�gernl �er 27 4 F l y iid spa ? �i f„ � CoCao r V 0.50 . - f`i CnSC nYc nl / I �anGrc re . L r-o'J n:1 a'�i0h Lourel54 Lo4E /J3ro �1p.b3 S r' I hereby ctafyA,to +I eS,lem 1> " .that the G �t � buildto ted on the U nP groLmy oym HER ^y - - a MELLO ' .31 ATE:SEPT. 19,1999 ;r°R CE:PL-0J BK 60 13 PG3z(oistoph r`R Mie to PLS 31311 40 LOWELL STREET PEABODY, MASS. 01960 3C 531-8121 STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. CAT Sept. 7 , 1989 9115 Queen Executive Center p — - 167A Washington St., Rt. 53 PROJECT NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 Pizza Hut LOCATION 105 Canal St. , Salem, MA (617) 878.0135 CONTRACTOR OWNER TO I .C.M. I .C.M. WEATHER TEMP. Oat AM 105 Canal Street °at PM PRESENT AT SITE Salem, MA _ Will Lassel=_IrrC .M_rn M. Branting- Stmctu�r_es Eqq. THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Personnel -Intr4loLO tal &:DSalvage iTIC r i > Full time inspections were made on August 21 , 2.2 , 23 ,24. 5 ajnd 280 ___ to observe the preparation and driving of the piles at tYl`y_suy ect 3-6b'__ All of the piles were pressure treated timber piles, 55 '_0" long_, were driven to varying de tp hs to attain a blow count,_previously ___ calculated, of a minimum of 6 blows per inch for the final 6 inches of penetration. All piles werefitted with steelboots prior to. driving- A copy of_ the formula used to determine the required blow count_i.s-included with. this report along with pile driving records and pile cu -offs, - COPIES TO 1, SIG NEU� J STRUCTURES ENGINEERING do0 R L�' (-t'�T — qL�r r"I, ✓I �1 Queen Executive Center SHEET No. / DE 167 Washington Street / NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 CALCULATED BY DATE 7/ (617) 878.0135 CHECKED BY DATE_ SCALE PILE. .DR1�/ING . i'CECbRD ac):mcT Q1ZZA a+(n LO CAT /. PILC..coNrRacwe :J,(2. 1?t f"fi1� 1/dT7z4� `71M12K cNT�GoU4 s1 [ NIF PILE....TYPB; —77 M 'DESIGN LCiAL i �5--``I-b't�l� • ' AIL . a NAMH627 1t lir s i' p Ire ',TO Vc�prz. M�? rLAo�l�f" l N�� .... RATED EN�¢4Y: //266 �S . SPE ' PII:E_ Cur , 13UTT..D1A Ti etELer. . u 6 RuuN f CUTnRP �w► PAYMT. �N } _ . REH �s 9 o to IF ! p SII 16fl a I IN (1 L. i o .. 7 h 140 io p�r�� a z 7V r IS rz D,o t� 12 H �I. i" , . ' A 3to tw IGS . .. low �f,o ��ll ord 7N'' I ;0-'V. n'II' 2�26, 1 �" .pYZ 40 IQ (a%2` 10 , rnopFrm l=iz.c.ao-,um Dun. STRUCTURES ENGINEERING DB X 22 In'o7- SFa[..YP"�i Nlh1 Queen Executive Center SHEET NO OF f j" 167 Washington Street CALCULATEDBYIL�*?i=,'f`�?1° M '° DATE 0//7/ 89 NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 (61.7) 8780135 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE PILE . .DRIV►NU �ECdR9 PILQGDNTRACTUIL• J. 2i_`}=�I ..tTF1�/1�rr�c-1G��1=7�C°..7�:=K � SfI[`y'1��l ;:� /uc'',.. ,� ILE.....TYP'S: .....1 k M?,c,!:R '�;?l . . �eswN ,.010» ..... 25'Tb�►S.. . � �6�,,1 a,S�Yz�, RgT6D. EN�4 is N6L� r-`�1Q1• -,TVML' V�IG� PIL[..kAHM62 . VU No N -Ra� 1 PI LH tE �UTT p,A T P E1 A+i�. " �AY i I i Ni La D:ai DIA.' Ro�N (7� Cur•i CuTOPF � PAYaT N /1A2 r -411:111.". r to 1 I L �� 1�3t ( j V � p ... 29 a /(P` .... 17 ' 10 M , �� i�h'• 951, � ,z�n �r-i� � , eyzN �✓`/� IT -` O' evo 17 71, pp �y 1 /7 -/Do I �:1 �`A Vo rX 1)11 P$i=fill J=rc., W.,Mm 01111. STRUCTURES ENGINEERING JOB V1 22'g,\ �(i0T S4�r_I=ajt AAA Queen Executive Center SHEET NO. +^L of 2 167 Washington Street r(Z�jf}�{1'th.��`a - NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 CALCULATED BV_ ` DATE (617) 878.0135 CHECKED BY DATE_ SCALE I I ,...... ' � �I _ ...... I ECG RIVINU. RD :PRa_TecT . T'Iz2A 111) uo.CA�'lo►�: 1{�S C��1F"�l. ,�(".,SA�r?.r?�IMq .__. L. ,...... PILE_GpNTTtAC C ..• /AT'ZG lD✓G P Pip � ��/.5�1 V�f►"a�,91'IA 9E . PII. anr,�2� era' ri nlu V MATED. ENli t[.Y +2&O ... .......,, i.... I L. P la.e... L'eru a GDc�a.' LeL---- CUT ?3urr.Ale T P Eu ... SAY... ..... OIR, RpuN I ' uTnPF rnl► PA r1T N4 RemAr2 .. Y1 VV,t w QYz" 4' " ; , N ll 141k � foN � H Q 11 , I ! I ! , , j .... 1. v .. I.......... __...... ..... ... .... ......... - ... !.. . I i PApgICIAGI®la..C,gon Mm OIIIL DATE STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. Sept. 8, 1989 OB NO 9115 Queen Executive Center BRO,ECT 167A Washington St., Rt. 53 NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal St. , Salem �� (617) 878-0135 , CONTRACTOR OJ4NER /O TO Interstate Construction Mgt. I.C.M. �,izzac�Hut c/0 P1zzd Hut_ _ __—_ ______— WEATHER IEMo�O t (,)AM 105 Canal Street Sunny & Clear '! 7,2 t 2:00 — _ __ _.—.____— ___ — Salem --MA- OT970 --- PREBENT AT SITE Wil Lassel - I .C.M. John Gilewicz - S.E. , 'iv c. cP THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED. Several Workmen On Friday, September_9th, I inspected the formwork and reinforcing steel for the perimeter grade beams at the Pizza Hut under construction at_ 105 Canal Street in Salem. The purpose of the inspection was to review the work to insure compliance with the construction drawings and was requested by nterstate Construction Management, Inc. Approximately 95% of all perimeter formwork and reinforcement was in place and tied off. Several corner bars and the slab dowels had yet to be _laced and one top bar was in-place, but not tied off . This was done in order to facilitate placement of the concrete. All other work was in conformance with the contract drawings, and approval was granted to pour the concrete. COPIES To Dave Harris - Salem Bldg_,_Dept, �� 0�� SIGNED JOB -l�Qyi/ur— STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. SHEET NO. `\ / OF I Queen Executive Center 167A Washington St., Rt. 53 CALCULATED BY � G� w� DATE NORWELL, MASSACHUSETTS 02061 (617) 878-0135 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE z" GnrN. NX l ��StA(j • SGtr� ScbT ' . � , i , .. cl, cn c C L--' 177. /1✓oT� Ru r7T/aE�t iraE�FJ./io,.1Sq _ 1 o rn • • 5 PiFGb-k., J s F� S£GTI��J'.7�=0�J _i PI a2�A- kJT NEW ALA--44e,i ', DEsa?• � A-S ��V/S,EI� �nT`,E�/C1e[ .. i. 1 �ON77, Z,X 4'KEY _ ;.. a NQT1� _ F�.0 A�� A77rE.2 r?inE�ksia Js. ... r SP,/1c1Nt, � ,SFE JEGT/u� 3 c�rJ _I 1 L �J_ DJM.Iv..'L3E �ETF1tHlr1{✓4 .... I 8J kR4»1Tjr- T 'BAIF_D 04 F-i0Lo G72aD . ?3h..�Ec� anJ -PI L4—a tj BEAT, IAW1Ef ml®Irc,Amory Mm 0147L STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. 167A Washington Street • Norwell, Massachusetts 02061 (617) 878-0135 FAX (617) 878-0838 � rn o September 11, 1989 0 LAIP3 -n r,; d in r) Z �-rn r_: o City of Salem >o � Building Department :K One Salem Green =' �n p� Salem, MA 01970 Y' Attn: Mr. Dave Harris Re: Progress Report, Pizza But 105 Canal Street Salem, MA Dear Mr. Harris: Please find enclosed the following information regarding construction of the above-referenced project: 1. ) Sketch SK-1 of 1 showing revisions to the grade beam details; 2. ) Pile driving records; 3. ) Field report dated 9/7/89 detailing results of inspections on 8/21, 8/22, 8/23, 8/24, 8/25, and 8/28; 4. ) Field report dated 9/8 detailing results of inspection on 9/8 . If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Si?ohn rely P. ilewicz, P l JPG: jg Enclosure II SEI 09 11A (:A8PET y r (R/1 DECOR) Idl Carriage CARRIAGE CARPETS s DIVISION OF CARRIAGE INDUSTRIES, INC. CARPETSF, April 9, 1986 Dave Cottington Carpet Department Star Lumber Company P.O. Box 7712 Wichita, Kansas 67277 SUBJECT: Carpet Quality "PH-18000", Color - Green Plaid, Roll #51294 Dear Dave: Flammability tests for the subject carpet were conducted as specified in ASTM E 84, "Standard 'Lest Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials" (Tunnel Tbst) . Tests were conducted by the Hardwood Plywood Manufacturers Association exclusively for American Carpet Laboratories, Inc. Tbst Results: Flame Spread 50 (Class B) Fuel Contributed 30 Smoke Density 65 I am enclosing a copy of the full report. If I can be. of any further help, please call me. Yours truly,. CARRIAGE INDUS S, INC. Kenne h Bryso S Vice esiden of Manufacturing and neral Manager KB/PPP ENCLOSURE P.O. Box 542 9 Calhoun, Georgia 30701 a 404:'629-9234 • WATS 1.800/241-4211 r+SOD M\XYq CILX'� HARDWOOD PLYWOODU P. O. BOX 2789 MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION PRESTON, VIRGINIA 22090 DINFXKM REPORT ON SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS DETERMINED BY ASTM E-84 TWENTY-FIVE FOOT TUNNEL FURNACE TEST METHOD Prepared For CARRIAGE CARPET MILLS, IN CALHOUN, GEORGIA (CITY,STATE) T-3943 (TEST NO.) _ CARPET QUALITY: PH-18000 (MATERIAL) MARCH 25, 1983 (DATE) ((/��)) \Y/ I. SCOPE This report contains the reference to the test method, purpose, test procedure, rounding procedures, preparation and conditioning of specimens, description of materials, test and post test observation data, and test results. II. TEST METHOD The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM Designation E84, "Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials". The 25-foot tunnel method is also described by NFPA No. 255, UL No. 723. III , PURPOSE The purpose of the test is to determine the relative performance of the test material under standardized fire exposure. Results are given for flamespread and smoke developed. The values obtained from burning the test material represents a comparison with that of asbestos-cement board expressed as zero and red oak flooring expressed as 100, Since the inclusion of the area under the time-distance curve into the flamespread calculation this is only a guide line and not an absolute value, The flamespread results of 25-foot tunnel tests are frequently used by building code officials and regulatory agencies in the acceptance of interior finish material for various applications. The most widely accepted classification system is epitomized by the National Fire Protection Association Life Safety Code, NFPA No. 101: Class A 0 to 25 Flamespread Class B- 26 to 75 Flamespread Class C 76 to 200 Flamespread This flamespread classification system is based on the premise that the higher the flamespread numbers , the greater the fire spread potential . The relationship between the numbers developed under this test and life safety from fire has not been adequately established, t -2- IV. TEST PROCEDURE NOTES The furnace was preheated to 150°F (± 5°F) as measured by an 18 AWG thermo- couple embedded in cement 1/8" below the floor surface of the chamber, 23-1/4' from the centerline of the ignition burners. The furnace was then cooled to 105°F (± 5°F) as measured by a thermocouple embedded 1/8" below the floor surface of the test chamber 13' from the fire end. Prior 10-minute. tests with asbestos-cement board provided the zero reference for flamespread, fuel contributed, and smoke density. Periodic 10-minute tests with unfinished select grade red oak flooring provided for the 100 reference for the parameters as noted in Section III. A, Flamespread The flamespread distance is observed and recorded at least every 15 seconds or every 2 feet of progression. The peak distance is noted at the time of occurrence. The flamespread distance is plotted over time. The total area under the flamespread distance-time curve is determined; flame front recessions are ignored. The flamespread is then calculated. The value for flamespread classification for this material may be compared with that of asbestos-cement board and select grade red oak flooring. 8, Fuel Contributed A tine-Uir,perature curve is developed by plotting the temperature measured by a thermocouple located at the 24-foot point (vent-end) in the furnace. The value for fuel contributed is derived by calculating the net area under the curve for unfinished select grade 3/4" red oak flooring. ASTM E84 has dropped fuel contributed from the standard; however, some codes still reference other versions of E84 and thus HPMA is continuing to report it at this time. -3- C. Smoke Developed The smoke developed during the test is determined by the reduction in output of a photoelectric cell . A light beam vertically orientated across the furnace outlet duct is attenuated by the smoke passing through the duct. A curve is developed by plotting against time the values of the decrease in output of the photoelectric cell due to obscuration of the light source across the duct caused by the smoke. The value for smoke developed is derived by calculating the net area under the curve for the test material and comparing this area with the net area under the curve for unfinished select grade 3/4" red oak flooring. V. FLAMESPREAD AND SMOKE DEVELOPED ROUNDING PROCEDURES Single test calculated flamespread and smoke developed values are rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 and reported as the Flamespread or Smoke Developed Classification. Multiple test calculated flamespread and smoke developed values are averaged and the result rounded to the nearest multiple of 5, and reported as the Flamespread or Smoke Developed Classification. The actual values are also reported. VI. PREPARATION AND CONDITIONING OF TEST SAMPLES Three or four sections are generally used in the preparation of a complete test specimen which is 20-1/2" wide and 24' long. Materials 8' in length may be tested by using three sections 20-1/2" wide by 8' long for a .total specimen length of 24' . A 14" length of uncoated 16 gauge steel sheet is used to make up the remainder of the test specimen; it is placed at the fire end of the test chamber. Test specimens are conditioned at a controlled temperature of 73.4°F (± 5°F) and a controlled relative humidity of 50 ± 5 percent. T-3943 DATE OF TEST March 23, 1983 TEST N0. VII. MATERIAL TESTED Carpet Quality: PH-18000 MANUFACTURER: Carriage Carnet MIl1S, Inc. Calhoun, Georgia Burn Number 1) Nominal Dimensions --- 2) Average Thickness .330" 3) Average Weight - lbs./ft.2 --- 4) Product Description Carpet Quality: PH-18000 Roll No. : 51294 Secondary Backing: Jute 5) Color Green Plaid 6) Surface Cut Pile 7) Sample Selection Supplier 8) Material Descrip- Supplier tion by 9) Date of Selection March 1983 10) Purpose of Test Flcrospread Cetenmination Mounted on 1/4" asbestos ment board using 11) Method of Sample Sairmix #7 adhesive, Mounting REMARKS: TEST NO. T-3943 DATE OF TEST March 23, 1983 VIII. CONDITIONING, TEST, AND POST TEST OBSERVATION DATA Conditioning - Number of Days in Conditioning Area 9 Conditions at Test 1) Specimen Preheat Time (Min.) 2 2) Tunnel (Brick) Temperature (F°) 105 Test Data 1) Time a) Ignition Time (Seconds) 32 b) Flamefront - Time to End of Tunnel or Flamefront Distance 16' a 4:00 c) Area Under Time-Distance Curve (Min. -Ft.) 95,0 d) Time of Test (Min. ) 10 2) Fuel and Temperature a) Fuel (Cu.Ft./Min.) 5, 107 b) Maximum Vent-End Temperature (F°) 690 c) Time to Maximum Tempera- ture (Min.) 4:00 Observations of Burned Specimens 1) After Flaming Yes 2) Conditions after Cool Down a) Consumed to --- b) Burned to 16' REMARKS: TEST N0. T-3943 DATE OF TEST March 23, 1983 IX. TEST RESULTS Test results calculated on the basis of the areas under the curves of flamespread distance-time, furnace temperature, and smoke density are provided in the Table below. Flamespread Fuel Contributed Smoke Density Test Specimen Value Factor Factor Asbestos-Cement Board 0 0 0 Red Oak Flooring 100 100 100 Cormt Duality: 30 65 c. PH-18000 50 CONCLUSION: Based on one test, the f1mesoread, calculated according to A.SITI E-84-81a, meets Class B-75 or under flamespread. WI ROBERT F. ROBINS L IAM ; GROAH CHIEF ENGINEER TECHNICAL DIRECTOR HPMA HPMA This is a factual report of the results obtained from laboratory tests of sample product The results may be applied only to the products tested and should not be construed as applicable to other similar products of the manufacturer. The HPMA does not verify the description of materials and products when the description is provided by the client. The report is not a recommendation or a disapprobation by the Hardwood Plywood Manufac- turers Association of the material or product tested. While this report may be used fn- ni.tAininn nrrauct acceotance: it may not be used in advertising. IN` X 10 MIN Fr./INL � M1N FT . atilt ur Itsf � �/ D .S n. — MCA uvutx uAlVE r, U& , , FSC = .515 AT FoRAT 4 97.5 = .515 x 9 o _ Ye _ FSC = FOR AT 9 97.5 = �_ AurcmATIC INTEGRATOR AREA = 24 IGNITION TIME SEC. 22 Fm TIME 20 18 F 16 E 14 T 12 10 8 6 4.5 1 2 3 MI4NUTES 6 7 8 9 10 Time 1 : 15 :30 :45 1:00 1: 15 1:30 1:45 2:00 2: 15 2:30 1 2:45 1 3:00 3: 15 3: 30 3:45 Dist. i I > > Ft. 7 ID / /ai 3Z l31 Time 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5: 15 5:30 5:45 6:00 6: 15 6:30 6:45 7:00 7: 15 7: 30 Dist. Ft. Time 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 9:45 10:00 Dist. Ft. 0 5 01 100 " II qp 0 7 1 I I � I VIII i'I, IIII Ilii iI . IIII '. 11 II I':, I 11 . ''• . � 1 i I •l •60 I I , . 90 IIII 1. 100 10 20 30 _a� {— •50 I 70 80 I ' 7 III I I . � - I 111 I , I I 111 II , I I I II I ( , ii I I I 11 I I II 1 — I I I i l ': Ij 1 '', 1 }I�li— 11 11 �' 1 I I � ` ' 1 ' � i�•' Il � III , l III I I l I Ill ': II• IIII I '! '� { I I 1 `� I I II � 1 •I , I � I , l '. I SII. 1 1 I I 11 II 'i I - i I_ I i 40 S2 10 'CQ .f 8011 ' 70 1 'C _50 ^, 1 I i Iliit 'I� :j, t1pI II � 1II . . -*I— 01 I i 901I'' II 110 0 30 4`C O 50 0 � ^T r I I 1 1-- - -- - l- —L I . 11 i l ° i I I 1 ��~�'T? 1. \a� 1 ' }'' , I 1 I:I•j � � ! i III l - •III- --� �-� - I II'' � i • ' ' ' 0 1I ' ' I � �' I ' Ill •lei 'IIII I '• Il ilj, { IIII IIII 111 �I!1', 2 Z 1 _ 1 . 11 I I : 1111 'I III I I III p -- I I '' 1 II II III I ' 30 100 ' •'I 90 - •I . 80 ' . /0_ SO- -- -—50-- 40 _, ; I _ �- 1 HPMA FLAMESPREAD CERTIFICATION PROGRAM The Hardwood Plywood Manufacturers Association provides a product certification program for flamespread properties. This program is based on the selection and testing of panels within a given marketing line on the basis of that combination of factors that theoretically should give the highest flamespread values. Such factors as panel thickness, specific gravity, color of stain, type of lamination, surface texture, and product mix are taken into consideration in the selection of flamespread samples. While it is standard procedure to report fuel contribution and smoke developed values, the HPMA label identifies only the flamespread class. The label is evidence that the markeCing line has been tested and inspected in accordance with the HPMA Flamespread Inspection and Certification Program Procedures. The HPMA label is displayed below and indicates conformance of the tested samples to the Type II glue bond requirements as set forth in PS 51-71, Voluntary Product Standard for Hardwood and Cacorative Plywood, and conforn'ance to the Flamespread Class (200 or less) as dete miined by the test procsduras described in ASTM E84. ,��,C��..1�1UFACT FLAME OR LESS GLUE BOND �d .. TYPE II ASTM EE4 PS 51 -71 �yy T 0 MILL (NUMBER) DRAPERY MATERIAL �..- (R/I DECOR) ,�'''Y `lRe�'`r f,�—u+�`�;?y��,-��,�s a��.'�AD.�` �vVma uC�+�w "Vbr`!'exY�s,.•"x�p„"'v7�' o..�yq„'�Y > ,p�•v, q +!�4 vi, ��"� ✓'1!t. _ /f�ti ��w.+r TM✓ {at 'ib '� ". .n eib' M'�•II']I .�r a Ne m'd"r �. e.2,$3 3 1 �...3 n +. w� r c� �f�+f�� fYx�.10�w.r m".r'+"ryj„}'w� '�fifJ}{k+,✓ ,� ,� 4 y� ff � r�U1�� N✓�� ti�r ��, .,d''�'a,ye+� w"ly�y+.u,J i� v �♦+w 1G��,.w..e mw.° w.r RY'+,..• ::" f~S M. �.� Rf! - (�d�ga2..l J b"".J'�dr,'",. 43 wflr 't y/8 A�4✓,a' �.*w '�y1�e`+i(�tin g� �(�ia�'�3,y�JY'�ti.+ � M��' '"+ y�w'({�yl flA �AI G5Y]t JL'RI.t L CERTIFICATE OF (z i tri \ Y NON-FLAMMABILITY (i Vv y 3 1333 MERCHANDISE MART f♦g �� CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60656 { .,.' SHEERPLAME E This is to certify that the material known as ' (name of cloth) ) j, a ( Qs{✓Ha )1R� f� f ,e ❑Has been fire resistant treated. au ❑ 100%Fiberglass is non-combustible. Y'7 x❑ aXcWF:{61.Inherently Flame Resistant combined with 100 % v d iy Polyester !! r�ll3wrl Yom'. ;� t`5 tVia, The fire retardant material meets or exceeds the following specifications: mom ' ;g16y�zo,�Y1. New York City Board of Standards & Appeals Calendar No. 703-63-SM. 2. State of California, Fire Marshall's Office Requirement No. C-58, C-581, +", y } 11( C-58-2. Dated 7-18-63. 1 ,-� 3. N.F.P.A. Bulletin No. 701. E b 1 � ♦♦ss f3 a 4. Verticle Test Method 5903 of Federal Test Method Specifications CCC-T-191B and AATCC Test Method 34-1966. � 5. Fire Resistant Aspects of Federal Specifications: CCC-C-436C,MIL-C-14610, MIL-C-18387C,MIL-C-12095C,MIL-C-10895B,MIL-T-20618 and CCC-A-700 E. J & G Products,Inc. ,239 N,Rock Island,Wichita,K Ulfl 1r � Ct�,r f+^�`•� Unitex dusiries, Inc. ll,! t Tat+3j:1., (Signature /of. orized Person) WN I 'r7ti q1; Sworn to b are me thisft'! 31st day of Au 19821�yi� Y 1 — �+ S HL .�Ra.�c-.-�.nAf�.�.ls. }rj��0�s.'�"�'Trv�exmTT•rr z s—ma'r nrr -z? ,�'n qAm 1 ; ! t ;. I ,J F° w a,;,,a .., c .., 't3 w4 t'♦ c M 1x,.+ , ^+ v!',,.r cq:"+^.�a..V a ��} su 't` fpV,r �'4 i•'N^ `M'`^!fa"+u M"v � ",au 't's !ip ",M`'`wlf k.+, �k'; [f"S .'�+~ f� I SLY>° ,..11;.. J'Si .arl> ixii': �,y?— ci1�.JM "' ,fit+ � 1� � �' �$ S y�` &" �a.•`•Q'Y �< �'y) � ._ - ... ,.. ... ..-_, +,.,,. ....,. ,. 5...- -.,_- ,.. _. 7 t.,, .,. ,.`;.�.w ..e YiSs,.tlk`fJ%.k:�+rriE'i. -....`•:r t164i'[aa51 J:i: ROLLER SHADE MATERIAL WINDOW COVERINGS, INC. (A/C & R/I DECORS) P.O. BOX 11303 • 1135 N. WASHINGTON WICHITA. KANSAS 67214 316-2654893 1.800362.0208 SPECIFICATIONS BRENNEMAN DIANA FYRBAN Basic Fabric bleached long stable cotton cambric cloth, 140 threads per square inch. The finishing process, thoroughly impregnated with vinyl Plastic. No filling or treatment other that pure vinyl plastic is used. Color fast to both sun and washing. All conventional colors will withstand over 300 hours in fade-o-meter test without color change, Washability - completely washable, can be thoroughly scrubbed with soap and water. Tensile and tear strength - direction of warp length-wise 58,3 pounds per square inch average. Testing methods, U.S. Government specification CCCT/191B section 5102 with Scott tensile tester, Tear Strength in direction of fill crosswise 343 grams average, Testing Methods U.S, Government specification CCCT/19lB section 5132 with Elmendorf tear tester, Weight - 5,3 ounces per square yard, average Federal and State Specifi- cations CCC-C-521E dated March 7, 1977 and DDD/S/251D dated April 13, 1966, Flame resistance - Flame retardant finish will not support flame. Meets Federal Specifications CCC-C-521-E dated March 7, 1977 for flame resistance. Registered by the State of California as an approved retardant fabric, certi- ficate number 12. Available Colors: White Cream Dark Ecru Dove Grey Light Ecru Almond Peach Dust Winter Green Mint Navy Jet Stream Burgandy Rose Blossom Black First Light Red Oyster Blue Antique White Green Ivory Yellow PLEATED SHADE MATERIAL (A/C & R/I DECORS) PLEATED SHADE FABRIC F.R. fabrics are woven polyester. Sheer is 100% Trevira F.R. and all others have chemical finishes which are applied to increase the flame resistant characteristics. TEST METHODS: National Fire Prevention Association Standard 701 Vertical Test. This test measures the char length, the after flame time, and whether or not the drippings burn. The 701 test is the standard test for measuring the flame resistance of textiles and film nationally. State of California Administrative Code, Title 19, Public Safety, Article 4, Section 1273.3 (Small Scale Test).This test is more stringent when compared to other recognized tests and is consequently widely accepted as certification of flame resistance in other geographic areas. .Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 302, "Flammability of Interior Mate- rials," as specified in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 49, Transportation, Section 571.302. PLEATED SHADES STACK SO TIGHTLY THEY ALMOST DISAPPEAR As well as being extremely compact,two shades oper- ating independently on one headrail is a feature which gives pleated shades day-to-day convenience.The shade below left,is fully extended to 104 inches.The shade at right,also 104 inches,is only 2 inches high in its fully raised position. I x . J( - _ `jtyT I ,. BOOTH SEAT & CHAIR PAD UPHOLSTERY (A/C & R/I DECORS) Y •S. .moi+: µ JJ 4 1A RAM bta S BRAND FABRC Technical Data Bulletin UNIROYAL, Inc. • 312 N. Hill Steer • P.O. Box 2000 • Mishawaka, Indiana 46544-1399 SPS-0152 12/28/81 Stouchton Plant UNIROYAL SPECIFICATION NAUGAHYDE EXPA24DED VINYL UPHOLSTERY SPIRIT of.'.-25 , EXHIBITOR, NED.CHROME 1. Material: a. Coating shall consist of a•vinyl resin base, suitably compounded, plasticized and expanded so as to be of the proper gage; be free from tackiness; have a suitable hand; and be flame, mildew and oil resistant. b. Base fabric shall be jersey knit appropriate to meet -" requirements listed below. 2. Special product properties : a. Flame, mildew and oil resistant. b. Designed to meet the physical properties requirements of Federal Specification CCC-A-680a, Class 2 Treated: (a) 1 Regular fire resistant; (b) Mildew resistant; and (c) Oil resistant. c. Anti-static slip finish. 3. Width - 54" minimum. Fed. Std. 191-5020 4 . Weiglit - 24 . 8 ± 1. 5 oz/yd2. Fed. Std. 191-5041 5. Thickness - 50 +5 mils . CS-273-65 -4 nils 6 . Breaking Strength (Tensile) - Fed. Std. 191-5100 65 lbs . warp x 60 lbs . filler minimum. e• CONTINUED - PAGE 2 SPS-0152 12/28/81 7. Tearing Strength (Trapezoid) - Fed. Std. 191-5136* i 14 lbs . warp x 12 lbs . filler minimum. 8. Abrasion Resistance (Wyzenbe,pk) - Fed. Std. 191-5304* No wear through to vinyl foam - 500 double rubs . 9 . Adhesion of Coating - CS-273-65 3 lbs./inch minimum. 10 . Accelerated Weathering (Weather-O-Meter) - Fed. Std. 171-5804* No appreciable fading of color, discoloration, exudation or development of stiffness or tackiness . 120 hours exposure. 11. Hydrostatic Resistance - Fed. Std. 191-5512* 50 PSI minimum 12 . Volatility - CCC-A680* 10% maximum / 13. Plasticizer Loss - Activated Carbon Extraction - CCC-A-680A* 10% maximum 14 . Cold Resistance - minus 200 + 20F. Fed. Std. 191-5874* The costing shall not crack through to the base cloth. 15. Flexing (Newark) - CS-273-65* No separation of the vinyl foam, from, the vinyl skin or base fabric after 15;000 cycles. - - 16 . Stitch-Tear - CS-273-65 25 lbs. warp x 20 lbs. filler minimum 17. Blocking - Fed. Std. 191-5872 Scale rating 3 maximum 18 . Crocking - Fed. Std. 191-5651 Good - minimum 19 . Elongation (Ford Stretch Test) - CCC-A-680A* 5% warp x 25% filler minimus: V Ell IN x.,'s f BPANO FABPiC �,.�{� i Technical Data Bulletin UNIROYAL, Inc. • 312 N. Hill Street • P.O. Box 2000 • Mishawaka, Indiana 46544-1394SPS-0152 12/28/81 CONTINUED - PAGE 3 20 . Flame Resistance (Vertical) - Fed. Std. 191-5903 After flame 2 .0 seconds maximum Char length 3.0 inches maximum 21. Breaking Strength After Accelerated Aging (Tensile) - Fed. Std. 191-51--* +5850 Not less than 75% of the initial breaking strength, after aging 48 'hours at 2120 to 2210F. r 22 . Mildew Resistance (Soil Burial) - Fed. Std. 191-5100* + 5762 f Breaking strength shall not be less than 75% of the strength before soil burial . 23. Oil Resistance (Mineral Oil) - 'CCC-A680A* Oil shall not permeate the coated fabric. *See Federal Standard CCC-A-680A for test methods and modifi- cations. **Spirit of ' 76 and Exhibitor do not conform to the requirements of CCC-A-680A which relate to Government Procurement such as inspection, packing, . marking, AQL levels , sampling, delivery, etc. The requirements for physical properties listed above (except abrasion resistance and blocking) apply to the average of the test results from a sample. REV 7/25/85 EAM WALLCOVERING (R/1 DECOR) TM t i PLAIDS STRIPES & BORDERS YORK ROLLAGE REQUIREMENTS METHOD H—BY CHART.SingleRollsolsido all Diswice To determine the correct amount of wallcoverinsin gs youm 9Rt Rn High High High Rc°ea�°g need to order,use either of these simple methods. in 36 t0 12 12 .16 6 METHOD 1—Square footage - a 12 12 u 16 6 (A) Measure distance in feet around the room. w 12 a 16 ^v 6 (B) Measure height in feet from floor to ceiling. b 1214 16 20 6 (C) Multiply width by height of each opening(Doors 52 a 16 " to 22 6 &Windows). 56 16 to 20 26 a 60 16 16 20 26 Multiply distance(a) by height, (b) then subtract, (c) 64 16 20 22 26 10 from the total. To determine the number of single rolls 66 16 22 26 26 10 needed, divide the total square footage by 30. The 30 72 20 22 26 30 12 square feel figure allows for maximum waste in trim. 0.6..1 o...t.etr..it.....um.letr 30.0.n.10...06 ming and matching. two o.e.i.p or oNf..p st". �^a J 2°.�'.+Sa. yy�.4�+ N.rF�^.�•>._\m.++ Y:'4''�S"'�'p`-+CTY2 �..JY7!`��SR-.�'�'3C" * tis +•',�r�2� .r <'Y'x I,q. v� FIRE RATING"TEST iz y4€? p' h Flame Spread: 0' Fuel Contnbut i Smoke Density. 5 ' - 1 „ iSource:An Independent Testing laboratory York u allcovedngs are resistant to grease and oils if substances are removed immediately with a mild detergent and water s� r d�,�a.'li'ri fh�5 •A,rl '�tf�e'T j � � I` �.v )) e� ....�.lS�2 4y47��L�'s�'-�X4'vy'+i�'ia:.«•96ZR?3�IIi:�'?3..{ t�3:<.siYY S>y .$s..Av4�� t�•: ckw4 ti USG Interiors, Inc. 44, t , ate., j M W B U L L E T Akj tk 202 Harger Street Dover,OH 44622 MARLITE COMMUNICATION BULLETIN V-88 July 11 , 1988 TO: ALL SALES PERSONNEL FROM: M. W. COOK SUBJECT: FIRE TEST DATA ON STANDARD PRODUCTS The following are fire ratings on our standard products. These products were tested according to ASTM-84 by an independent laboratory: FLAME SPREAD SMOKE CLASS 1 . Smooth Panel 1/4" 165 185 C 2. Textured Plank 155 330 C 3. Smooth Diamond Classic TA 115 150 C Plank 4, Wood Veneer Plank No test results but all components are Class C 5. Marlite Tambour No test results but all components are Class C 6. WoodcrestTM 100 100 C 7. FiretestTM Plank 5 0 A 8. FiretestTM II 10 20 A 9. FiretestTM 1 5 15 A 10. .MarliteR Brand Class 20 200 A "A" FRP 11 . MarliteR Brand Class 195 360 C "C" FRP I am sure that in most cases this information will satisfy most of our customers. Alfey ould need more tail information. we will be happy to supply it. M. W. COOK OW Product Manager SM ALTERNATE HARD BOARD PANELING ' PRODUCT BULLETIN # 11-88 March 31, 1988 TO. ,, CHAIN HEADQUARTERS FROM: J. C. Bailey SUBJECT: FIRETEST I USG Interiors and the Marlite Division is proud to announce its new Firetest I panels. . .the easy way to create a Class "A" fire rated wall surfaces. The panels carry a 5 flame spread with 15 smoke developed. The Firetest I panels have a revolutionary new incombustible substrate made of a ceramic phosphate alloy (CPA) reinforced with fiberglass. The rugged CPA substrate has the durability and strength to withstand the rigors of high-use commercial environments. It resists water related damage, which commonly plague other materials. The CPA substrate will not crack, crumble or disintegrate under high temperature or extreme humidity changes., The laminated face has a clear seal coating for increased abrasion resistance, color stability and easier cleanability. An attractive and functional palette of six woodgrains and solid colors are available to choose from, for both decorative and sanitary wall applications. The woodgrains are available in 4'x8' , 9' or 10' x 1/8" and the solid colors are available in 4'x8' or 10' x 1/8". Matching vinyl wrapped aluminum moldings are available in both 8' and 10' lengths. Custom colors and sizes are also available. Included is the Firetest I Brochure, and Installation Instructions. Samples and additional literature are available through your Marlite Sales Specialist. Inventories are available for immediate shipment from Dover, Ohio. The Marlite Division has five regional operation centers and thirty-one zone managers strategically located throughout the country. Our 'Marlite sales people are available, as always, to help you in meeting your requirements for fire rated wall products. The enclosed business reply card will assist you in obtaining further _ information about the new Firetest I product line. If you have any questions or if I may be of assistance, feel free to contact me or our Marlite Sales Specialist. ✓James C. Bailey FVF Senior Product Manager Sanitary Wall Products JCB/ml , - - ..:. _.. - ... . RETEKSr,"' 1 SPECIFTC ATIONS . F � FIRETEST PREFINISHED DECORATOR HIGH GLASS VINYLS Abrasion PANELING Testa Requirements Methods Abrasion resistance determined by a Tiber Thickness 4millf 10"% CS245-62 Abrader,using a CS-10 wheel with 250 gram Properties: _ Light Stability 150 hrs. ASTM DE-188 head load.Visual Inspection-Surface Thickness W Nominal) - _ Fade-0-Meter printed material shall show no abrasion wear of the print after 200 cycles.Loss in Weight- Flaur l.11bslth Stain Resistance On unprinted and embossed sheet(where 3500 Flexural Strength(Modulus o(Rupture)-3000 psi typical When tested in accordance with Section 4.3.8 of Commercial appearance is of major concern)item shall Umile trent - Standard CS-245562,there shall be no permanent stain after not have more than 0.0.2 gram weight loss Temile Strength(perpendicallel to pan to pan00 psi minimum 18 hours contact with 20 common testing agents including: - -__ Per 1000 cycles. Tensile Strength(perpendicular hour immersion)- er pane--50 psi typical �. - ------ -- - -------- Water Absorption 124 hour immersion)-15°k maximum 10%Sulphuric Acid,10%Sodium Hydroxide.Household - Thickness Swell(24 hour immersionximAmmonia,Oleic Acid,-0.2%maum 10%Nitric Acid,Ethyl Alcohol and 10%Hydrochloric Mid. Performance: - Flame Spread Rating: Flame Spread 5 J - =�; 'a` :Edlson _ Fuel Contributed - 0 IaMirada(Los Angeles) r-. +- Bellwood m' Smoke Developed 15 FortWorth ' r`Tested according to ASTM E-84 by an IndependentAd Laboratory. Dove - Adan Firetest Vinyl Finishes 1 Attractive,Functional.Easy to maintain i Firetest Vinyl Finishes ) SPECIFICATIONS -, y This specification lists the physical properties of Firetest unsupported,polyvinyl chloride film,decorated with em- V J homing and/or printing techniques.The film shall consist 1 7 - of a calendered,pigmented base film in solid colors, which is decorated with embossing and surface printing. - The woodgrained designs shall be pigmented base film - Nationwide Availability with a decorated printing,and sealed with a calendered The network of Marlite Organization Regional 1.Dover,Ohio(216)364-7561 film overlay of clear film. Operations Centers can help you coordinate 202 Harger Street 44622 shipments to jobsites nationwide.Each Opera- 2.Edison,New Jersey(201)225-1650 - Color and Finish - tions Center serves as a disbibution and service 80 Newfield Avenue,Raritan Center 08617 Material is to match standard sample,for both color and point for all our Brand products.They are a 3.FL Worth,Texas(817)625-6443 finish with the usual commercial tolerance allowed. key ingredient in The Marine Organization's 4601 Pylon Sheet 76106 hard-earned reputation for total dependability. Regional Operations Centers are located in: 4.Atlanta,Georgia(404)691-1234 TEXTURES&WOODGRAINS 3715 Adanta Industrial Parkway 30331 Tests Requirements Methods 5.La Mirada,California(213)944.0157 or Thickness 6mil±10% CS 245.62 (714)523-2500,16024 Phoebe Avenue 90638 Light Stability 500 hrs.Weather- ASTM D-1499-59T Ometer Abrasion CS-17 3000 cycles ASTM 1044-56 Grain Retention Excellent 250°F.4 minutes Cracking None AATCC 8-52 Sulfure Stain None ASTM D1712-60T Soapy Water Extraction 5%Mm. ASTM D-1239-52 Hexane Extraction 5%Max. CS 245-62 USG Interiors, Inc. The Madite Organization tsenne.ne Fnai=cr.re t, nd m aeot ucr,int— ,< NEVAMAR PRODUCT INFORMATION PLASTIC LAMINATE Nevamar Finishes TEXTURED-It softens Womdgmim,Pattems,and Solid In addition in the special Neu'amar dimensional products with a fine graining. and finishes,laminates in the line are available as mdi- STIPPLE-Emhossed surface texture with high light cated with the following finishes. reflectivity - BRUSHEDTEXTURED-Abonedtexturedfinishavail- Thefollowin codesidentif the finishavailability: able only on W-8-186 Gunstock Walnut. yPRODUCT/ GLOSSIE-Superior Gloss Finish on solid colors.Shipped BT-Brushed LN-Line S-Satin FINISH COLOR INDEX with a protective polyethylene film. Tre extud GRID-A surface ofembossed s uares available on solid G-Glossie M-Mirror SK-Sri le Textured Woods/Patterns 1.0 9 PP Mirror Woods/Stone Looks 1.0 colors. GD-Grid N-Natural SL-Slate Textured Solid Colors/Intertex 1.1 LINE-A classic embossed lineal surface available on GZ-Glaze PV-Polished Velvet T-Textured Textured Glyphix Series 1.1 solid colors. Natural Woods 1.1 MIRROR-A gloss surface for Marbles and selected Cost Differential Guide Textured Morris Series 1.1 Woodgrains. Textured Kaleidoscope Series 1.1 NATURAL-A low-luster finish for selected products. The cost index is based on general purpose non-solid Glaze Glaze Colors 1.3 Comes to life with an application of an oil-fe wax. laminate in Textured finish being equal m 1.0.The index Slate Black/White 1.3 PP fi used m determine the approximate cos[of the various Glossie Solid Colors 1.3 SATIN-A semi-glass surface only on 5-7-9 Solid Whim. finishes by multiplying the cost of Textured by the index Line - POLISHED VELVET-A slighdv higher sheen,available factor. Actual casts,however, will vary according m Line Solid Colors 1.8Solid Colors 1.8 only on Sparkle patterns. quantity and geographic area Grid Stipple Solid Colors 2.0 ` Polished Velvet Sparkle Series 2.5 Technical information listed below applies only to high pressure plastic laminates- NEVAMAR TECHNICAL INFORMATION see separate data sheets for information on other Nevamar items. Suggested Short Form state prior to fabrication.Inside comers of curouts should Although the values shown meet requirements of major Architect Specifications have 1/8" (3.2mm) minimum radius with edges filed regional and metropolitan building codes for Class I Surface shall be Nevamar high-pressure laminated plastic. smooth m prevent stress cracking. interior finish,applicable codes should he consulted before specifying NEVAMAR Fire Rated Laminate to be sure that GRADE:(H-5,HF-4,VF-3) FORMING RADII:Using suitable equipment,NEVAMAR these values comply. FINISH:(Textured,Glossie,etc.) laminates may be hot formed'in stocked grades to the While NEVAMAR Fire Rated Laminate can be used any- PATTERN:(No. following minimum outside radius:general purpose(H 5)2, Whileere Erin[eriorsire Rang,[hemajorappleusensin- verticalforming(VF-3)1/2;pnst(ortning grade(HF-4)5/8. elude tacticians,stairwells,entries,elevators.fixtures and )' "Pollowin normal temperature conditions used for post-( g P P cabinetry as required by code authorities.Write for specific ( forming,i.e.325°F.) information. MAINTENANCE:Surfaces of NEVAMAR Laminate may ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS:In addition to the laminate Material shall equal orexceed performance standards set be cleaned with a damp cloth and ordinary soap or house- products mentioned above, NEVAMAR also manufactures by National Electrical Manufacturers Association(NEMA hold ammoniated liquid detergent,Abrasive cleaners backing sheca,cabinet liner,special heavy-duty,static LD3.1-1985)for high-pressure laminated plastics. should not be used.Stubborn stains may require use of dissapative and laminated Floor[ile grade laminates.Call organic solvents such as alcohol,acetone,ketone(MEK), for information. Grades and Thicknesses lacquer thinner or paior solven[.(NOTE:Al though these TECHNICAL SERVICES:NEVAMAR has trained sales solvents will not harm NEVAMAR,they will aback the General Purpose icaio PecOm50"-1. for both horizonal contact adhesive at the glue line around the edges and rpersonnel servicing all sections of the country.Consult and vertical applications.(O.OSU"-1.27mm) trey are flammable.)Complete care instructions available local telephone yellow pays directory under"Plastic High upon request. Pressure Laminates"or contact Technical Service Depart- Postforming(HF 4):kr horizontal and vertical surfaces ment,Nevamar Corporation,Odemmn,MD 21113.Phone where a directional single radius is desired. (0.092"- APPLICABLE STANDARDS(Meets performance standards (301)569-5000. 1.07mm) of the following): - Vertical Forming(VF-3):Designed expressly,for vertical NEMA(National Electrical Manufacturers Assoc.) WARRANTY DISCLAIMER applications(0.030"-.76mm) Publication LD3.1-1985. There ore no warranties which extend beyond the destnp- Thicknesses are nominal* 0.005"(.13mm) Federal Specifications LP 508H tion on the face hereof,and seller makes no warranty, Mil.Spec.P-17171D(ships) impress orimplied based on any course of dealing or wage BASIC USE:NEVAMAR brand laminate general purpose of trade or of fitness for particular use or otherwise, H5 grade is manufactured for application to interior COST:Varies according m quantity,pattern and finish. except that rhe products sold hereunder shall be of mer- - horizontal and vertical surfaces where a decorative wear, NEVAMAR representatives or distributors will aid in charitable quality and shall conform to seller's standard impact and stain resistive surface is required.Horizontal quoting local prices. specifiearions or such other specifmccirms as shall have applications include surfaces of,counters,[able[ops, been agreed to in writing by seller and buyer,and buyer resrdenrial and commercial furniture,vanities,case roods, NEVAMAR ARP SURFACE®LAMINATES assumes all risk whatever as to the result of the use of stare fixtures and window stools. Vertical applications All Textured and most Dimensional Finish solid colors, the Products purchased,whether used singly or in combi- include wall panels,laminated interior doors,bath en- .plus many other items,are produced with NEVAMAR', nation with other substances or in any process. closures,toilet par[i[ions,and elevator cab interiors. exclusive ARP SURFACE.ARP SURFACE laminate has all NATIONWIDE AVAILABILITY: NEVAMAR laminate the properties of conventional laminate.But it also has sheets are available throughout the county from stock - LIMIWIONS: NEVAMAR laminate is not recommended superior abrasion and scuff resistance due to a very thin ing distributors.These distributors are supported with for exterior use or direct application to plastered walls, deposit of microscopic particles of aluminum oxide on gypsum wallboard or concrete walls.Do not use in areas the conventional melamine lave,An ARP SURFACE NEVAMAR Customer Service Centers located in major exposed to temperature in excess of2750F(I 350C).F.abri- - laminate has at least three times betterNEMA iNear trading centers. Consult the yellow pages of your local cation should not be done below 65°F(18°C). Value than standard laminates h also offers A We., telephone directory under "Plastic High Pressure P Laminates"or contact NEVANIAR Corporation. resistance to scuffing and abrasion and resists gloss Natural Finish is no[recommended for applications such change during use Therefore,ARI'SURFACE laminates FACTORY as food service areas where constant thorough cleaning tend ro retain a"brand new"appearance during most and waxing are impractical.High gloss finishes and dark of their useful life.All other properties meet the normal Maryland,Odemmn 21113 solid calors tend to highlight surface scratches and abm- NEMA test requirements.Consult vour local NEVAMAR 8339'lelegraph Rd.-301/569-5000 sions.TheNEVAMAR boo should be considered when specifying representative or distributor for a hmchure which full}' CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTERS P explains the benefits of this remarkable new surface. California Cerritos CE 01 CE COMPOSITION AND MATERIALS:NEVAMAR laminate NEVAMAR FIRE 16411 Shoemaker Ave.-213/404-1274 is manufactured by pressing melamine resin impregnated RATED LAMINATES Illinois,Imsca 60143 pattern paper over layers of phenolic resin impregnated 1141 W.Bryn Mawr Ave.-312/773-3710 kraft paper at pressures approximatingg 1000 His.per UL-fisted NEVAMAR Fire Rated se minor.is available in square inch at temperatures in excess of 275°F(135°C). 0.050"(1.27mm)general purpose and 0.(1311"(.i6mm) New Jersey M[.laurel 05054 The hack is sanded to maintain a uniform thickness and vertical gmdes.Bonded with prescribed procedures to Fico 107 Gaither Drive-609/234 8760 to facilitate bonding. rated particleboard and backed with NEVAMAR FR back- North Carolina Charlotte 28241 ing,it produces a Class 1 fire rated panel.When bonded P.O.Box 7728-704/588-3160 SIZES: to Durafiake FR Board or asbestos cement board using Oregon,Portland 97218 Widths-30"(762mm),36"(914mm),48"(1219mm), Poppers Daracolim GI 124 or GI 149 Adhesive,NEVAMAR 6709 N.E.59th Place-503/288-0606 60"(1524mm). Fire Rated Wminam provides the following fire hazard Lengths-60'(1524mm),72'(1829mm),96'(2438mm),- classification(ASTM-E-84): Texas,Dallas 752_9 120"(3048mm),144"(3658mm). 11125 Zodiac Lane-214/243-1175 DuraOake FR Board Asbestos These are nominal dimensions,obtainable from wen,iz, Need More Information,Samples? 3/8"or 3/9"nr Cement sheets. Greater Greater Board Simply address}ant[request to e cgr.iicatinn d, Ode Department, Nev,lan Corporation, 313') li'vgraph Pond. Odcmmn, be bonded tit a METHODS: N such as It laminate ehuuW Flame Spread...... 25 20 20 MarvFmJ 2111:1. be bonded to a cure material such a ply wool,particle. pmol Di wloped.... U U 11 board,flakmare hoard a metal using adhesives and u rens,and SmoWhen bonded tL... re 45 5 N V-Y/ \I • U �R� A recommended National by reliable adhesive manufacturers,and When ldwoo m 3/8"or greater Durafiake FR Board American N igh Pr ssure a oratiae Laminate Standards for Lain lVrldwo id#2621 Adhesive,.N'haz rdcl Pim Ragd Fabricated high 1979re ons red by Laminate Counter- (ASTM 8Pros4): des the liillmving fire hazard classification [ops ANSI A161L7979(sponsored by National A Association (AFlarre 34): DECORATIVE LAMINATES of I'lasuc Pohricanms). Ram,Spread ............................2i Fuel Contributed...........................0 Care should be taken to assure that a moisture imbalance Smoke Developed. .................... 145-200 dues out exist between NEVAMAR laminate and the sub- 91988 Nevamar corporation Form No.N-8808 , Printed,a U.S.A. PLASTIC LAMINATE TECH DATA i Y 1. 5 "' 1. PRODUCT NAME '• .j THICKNESS Depends onlammate type quality using adhesives and techniques WILSONART Brand decorative laminate selected. See Physical Properties chart recommended by the adhesive producer. .N basic types . : {: Colors and Patterns: *,.. �.;LOKWELDe Brand contact adhesives are < ry N707—General Purpose Type `.::gvailable in a full range of WILSONART -available and will meet the majority of <7 i i--.Nominal inches 0050" h designs, solid colors and woodgrains bonding conditions. . ff335—Vertical Surface Type `,•Care should be taken to assure that Finishes: Nominal inches: 0.030" - excessive moisture imbalance between #350—Postformmg Type: ,.. Finishes are offered as designated by the laminate and the substrate does not y '' Nominal inches:0.042" F,.pattern number +:. a-','exist. A compromise climate for 2. MANUFACTURED BY: Gloss (1) A mirror sheen finish giving a fabrication would be 75°F. and 45% RH i RALPH WILSON PLASTICS CO r :.smooth,brilliant appearance Glossometer 'Laminate should be stored under drier V 600 General Bruce Dnve , -`' reading: MD 85, CD 80. - ,.conditions than the substrate when posse - ':Temple,Texas 76501 ( ,,:,;Satin (2) Semigloss. A satin sheen .Cble. Prior to fabrication, the face Y ? ' substrate and back should be conditioned �i in 'Phone: (817) 778-2711 :,.Glossometer reading: MD 20 CD 12 -,TWX:910-890-5860 r ,1r a ;±(Textured (6) Nondirectional textured in the same environment for 48 hours_ yV.,y;,. Cane Creek Industrial Park "surface with moderate reflective quality `:Square-cut inside corners should be <i f41,.1 �"'a ` -Fletcher,North Carolina 28732 .r'Es',r x',Glossometer reading: 7 0 . ,<;<< ;, avoided.All inside corner cutouts should r, ,Cn 7:'f , Phone: (704)-684-2351 � ' t}'�Texturetl (13)Much finer texture than (6) have a minimum of 1/8" radius and alj' - F ""a,, ;TWX:510-935-0065 a t ?*-with slightly higher sheen Glossometer edges should be routed smooth i2 .T . ;Avoid the use of WILSONART decors r 3. GENERAL DATA s '.treading: 12 to 75. - -°' Intended Uses: +, :Natural Solt Sheen(15)A low lustre hnish five laminate as a structural member. "' '� '-General Purpose Type#107 is intended r 'with the appearance and feel of wood a Forming old be accomplished Types #335 -.for application wherever a decorative and : May be spray waned Glossometer ,and #350 should be accomplished using v; ' functional surface is required for reading:4 to 6. . ,;: :y1 , �, ;heat and uniform pressure applied by any ',i < `horizontal orverlical applications.Typical ':Leather (26) Deeply embossed toresem Rf several commercially available post c 'forming machines.`For further informs 5`o xae {,horizontal uses are on countertops, -ble the beautiful, natural grain of leather 5' vanities, desks, case goods, window- Glossometer reading: 63 _ `aeon, the local WILSONART sales repre : ,stools, etc. Vertical applications include sentative should be contacted. o r PP Slate(36)A true dimensional with the look � ,,F,abrication should be made using 1xy wall panels, teller cages, etc. -.; 1 -and feel of quarried.slate Glossometer approved methods. Assembled pieces 'm ' Vertical Surface Type#335 is intended `reading:8.5 : �p for vertical applications such as wall :Lines 46 & 49 Both vertical and hors should meet specifications of NAPF panels case goods, etc. Radiused edges ( ) :(National Association -1 Plastic m��eug P 9 9 nonfat versions to strengthen linear Fabricators), and ANSI A 161 2 1979 are easily obtained with proper post _ designs.#46is long grainand#49iscross ;:.,:where applicable. "m M! ?< forming equipment. .grain. Glossometer reading: 4l0 6. - .. Postforming Type #350 is intended for 5. AVAILABILITY —COST Crosshatch (56) A surface that simulates Availability: - - vertical or horizontal interior surfaces - where it is necessary to roll the laminate the appearance and feel of woven cloth. WILSONART laminates are available Glossometer reading: 4 to 6. through WILSONART distribution centers on a simple radius over the edges of the Grid 76 Small eometric-check em 9 substrate. This leaves an attractive ( ) g - listed on the reverse side of this sheet. surface, eliminating seams. Typical uses _ bossing to highlight geometric designs. Cost: Glossometer reading: 18.5 MD &CD. Varies according to quantity ordered are for built-in sinks, vanities, bath 9 q Y enclosures, etc. - : Note:Glossometer readings made @ 60° ,_,Specific price- information may be - WILSONART basic type laminates may light reflection., - obtained from your WILSONART sales be used for fine quality residential and Note:If extra high wearTUFSURF@ II sur- representative. contract furniture andarchitectural face is required, certain precautions 6. MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY: surfacing applications on columns, should be taken in pattern selection. ..WILSONART basic types #107, #335, ,, •, wainscoting, valances, cornices, interior Contact your WILSONART sales #350 laminates are manufactured to meet representative. Physical properties of .doors and divider systems. _. physical specifications as referred to in Basic Limitations: - •TUFSURF II meet or exceed NEMA Part 2 -- Applicable Standards. WILSONART basic type laminates are (HW)Abrasion Class l in FSL-P-508H,per . Inasmuch as RALPH WILSON designed for interior use only and not publication LD3-1980. PLASTICS COMPANY has no control - - - recommended for direct application to Technical Data: over end products fabricated with plaster walls, concrete walls or gypsum See Physical Properties chart. materials sold, no warranty is expressed wallboard. These laminates are not a Applicable Standards: or implied. structural material and must be bonded to All basic types conform to all require- 7. PRODUCT MAINTENANCE: a suitable substrate. ments of NEMA Publication L03-1980. The decorative surface may be readily Do not subject to extremes in humidity - They also meet Fed. Standard LP508H cleaned with warm water and mild soaps - - - or temperatures over275°F.forsustained and Motor Vehicle Safety Standard such as used fordishes.Useof abrasiveor periods of time. 302/Flammability. All printed patterns "special" cleansers should be avoided meet NSF/35 Food Service Areas. Composition of Product: - because they may contain abrasives. Melamine impregnated decorative sur- In addition,#107 is approved by MIL-P- acids or alkatines.Stubborn stains may be face papers are superimposed over kraft 17171 (SHIPS)/Plastic Laminate; and by removed with organic solvents or 2 phenolic core sheets and bonded at pres- Fed. Reg. (1975)/HUD Flame Spread for minutes' exposure to a hypochlorite sure exceeding 1/2 ton per square inch Mobile Homes Part 280.203, par. 1 and 4. bleach such as "Clorox' followed by a 107d C, an # while maintaining temperatures in excess #335 meets Parts A and clean water rinse. of 280°F.After pressing, edges and ends meets Part C,of 191 FAA,Part 25.853,"Air- 8. TECHNICAL SERVICES: are trimmed and the back side is sanded to craft Compartment Interior." Each distribution center has trained facilitate .bondin 4. INSTALLATION: 9 personnel conversant with the fabrication Specification Data: WILSONART decorative laminates are of all WILSONART products. Technical SIZES (nominal inches): not for exterior useand must bebondedto services are also rendered from the Widths: 30", 36", 48", 60" a suitable substrate` such as plywood, Ouality Assurance Laboratory in Temple, Lengths: 72", 96", 120", 144" particleboard or flake board of reliable Texas. „ PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TEST '-TYPICAL NEMA '.':ATYPICAL " NEMA TYPICAL +- NEMA WILSONART -..STANDARD 'WILSONART ,."STANDARD WILSONART :}'STANDARD VALUE:GP8107 GP50 ''1 VALUE:VSTN335 GP28 PF30 VALUE:PFk350 - PF42 `z ti _..r • Thickness ' 0051" 0050'm 0005 0.031" 0028 s 0.004' 0.030" 0041 C 0042"m 0.005' r Surface Wear400 cycles+ 400 Cycles (min) -400 cycles 200 cycles 300 400 cycles+ y 400 cycles(min) :Boiling Water no effect no effect no effect no effect on face --'no effect no effect .;High Temperature ;slight effect slight effect slight effect - slight effect !slight effect ^!slight effect Radiant Heat y140 seconds 125 seconds 85 seconds 80 seconds(min) 110 seconds 100 seconds (min) .. Stain (group I �.*no effect no effect no effect no effect no effect no effect ' (group Iq moderate effect moderate effect moderate effect moderate effect '-moderate effect moderate effect Color Fastness ='+t-.slight effect *.:slight effect slight change -",slight change 'slight change i"slight change r Dimensional Stability' (MD) s 022% 0.50%(max) 0.5% 07% max 11% - J0 1.1%(max) e (CD) s n'057°Po ` � 0.9°k(max) .0:8% 12% max 14% .080% :14%(max) s Impact r •:60 orches A 50 Inches r i 24 orches %a .'20 orches' & i 50 inches ..30 mche3ymin) r 1 Contludive Heat --no effect no effect no effect no effect c ,9 no effect 'er s no effect z s a M 4 ;easrcE rh s k ... r _ r ` Cleanabihty e" -,,575 cycles 25 cycles(max) X15 cycles '1? ,�25 cycles_(max) .,q 15 cycles 'r ✓ `t-'25 cycles(max)tz .` Scuffing -.',no effect no eIfeCt "no effect no effect :;no effect 'oo effect J,; Formability 1,z r Vl.not applicable not applicable 7/16"radius, 1/2"radius !'"' '9/16"face,3/16" back 5/8 face ,'- Blistering not applicable "'not applicable ..45 seconds ,:r 440 seconds i..:.70 seconds ::..55 seconds s _ ) :.'Radius listed for outside bend is actually the radius of the form around which the plastic is`postformed. The radius listed for inside 2 bend is actually the radius to which the decorative face is postformed F;iHa .:"1( I.rr�,ice'`5 '.,, -r, ,. �� i , ,f ;:TYPICAL FIRE TEST DATA'-" `�•yAll- .�3. ' It is recommended that ihefollowing reagents notbeallowed to remain in .�r " ..+•S r :. • . contact with the decorative material. .,Type Flame Smoke �' -• 1. Hypochlorite bleach (e g., Hilex, Clorox) except under maintenance $'.Unbonded Sheets provisions,section (7) - `107 - .100 35 " 2. Hydrogen peroxide solution in any concentration 335 30 30 3. Mineral acids (e.g., hydrochloric, sulfuric and nitric acids) . 350 S0 40 4. Lye solution (containing 1 percent or 2 percent lye, e.g., Drano) -5. Sodium bisulfate (e.g., Sani Flush) Bonded W/Contact To Particleboard 6. Potassium permanganate in any concentration ' 107 190 130 7. Berry juices, such as grape and raspberry - 335 165 `",135 8. Silver nitrate (1 percent concentration) -' - - 9. Gentian violet in any concentration - .. 350 �� 170 155 10. Mild silver protein such as 20 percent argyrol - 11. Bluing - -'ASTM TEST E84 12. Dye (e.g., Tinlex. Rit) .. , . 13. Iodine solution (alcohol containing 1 percent iodine) DISTRIBUTION CENTERS ATLANTA COLUMBUS LOS ANGELES ARCHITECTURAL& SAN FRANCISCO 224 Rio Circle 1758 Westbelt Drive 13911 E. Gannet Street DESIGN OFFICE : - 1753 Sabre Street Decatur, GA 30030 Columbus, OH 43228 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 919 Third Avenue Hayward, CA 94545 (404) 377-0731 (614) 876-1515 (213) 771-8141 New York, NY 10022 (415) 782-6055 (213) 921-7426 (212) 753-8686 BOSTON DENVER (714) 523-1200 (212) 753-8687 - 51 Concord Street 3900-G Nome Street SEATTLE MIAMI PHILADELPHIA North Reading. MA 01864 Denver, CO 80239 20866 84th Avenue S. 315 West 75th Place PHI Bethel Avenue (617) 662-9700 (303) 373-0286 Kent, WA 98032 Hialeah, FL 33014 Pennsauken, en 08110 (617) 664-5230 (206) 872-8070 (305) 822-5140 (609) 662-4747 _ CHICAGO DETROIT NEW YORK (215) 923-5542 TEMPLE 1100 Chase Avenue 13281 Merriman Road 1 Brenner 500 East Ridge Drive Elk Grove Village, IL 60007 Livonia, MI 48150 Congers. Drive rive 10920 Temple, TX 76502 (312)437-1500 (313) 425-7920 Congers, (817) 778-7391 (312) 569-2758 (212) 933-1035 - 5144-W101-84RY-15M (PRINTED IN U.S.A.) ALTERNATE PLASTIC LAMINATE TA IMCH DA }t I 1. PRODUCT NAME -;NOTE. For #900 Series METALCOR I S. AVAILABILITY -COST =ym, WILSONART. Brand FIRE-RATED thicknesses see METALCOR Tech Availability: • . �m `� Thigh pressure decorative laminates. Data sheet. .:'WILSONART FIRE-RATED lami D >Product Numbers 604, 605, 607 264 Finish: Textured (6) only. ;'nates are available through any of the Z -i Nand 900 Series METALCOR. _ METALCOR finish is matte texture ',distribution centers listed on the "-a p MANUFACTURED BY. -` ,.,.COLORS AND PATTERNS: The full %':reverse side of this sheet. RALPH WILSON PLASTICS CO -- range of WILSONART designs,solid Cost '' PC) .'600 General Bruce Drive colors and woodgrains Varies according to the quantity mm z',Temple, Texas 76501 .''•"`Technical Data: - 'ordered and the job site location. =`"1° m Phone: (817) 778-2711 .;..WILSONART FIRE-RATED HPDL Specific price information maybeob- om "TWX: 910-890.5880 .::has been classified by Underwriters tained from your WILSONART sales :q y Cane Creek Industrial Park >.:Laboratories as listed in Table 1. `i representative. -Fletcher, North Carolina 28732 } -Applicable Standards: ' 6. MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY yA m `'i.;. �'`fWX e510-935-0065 51' t�:S§� ` x ,"r4+}°`WILSONART .FIRE-RATED .lama 3PWILSONART FIRE-RATED-HPDL =.;Q m ,., ,,-,nates conformto NEMA Standard ,Is manufactured to meet physical "'3. GENERAL DATA '' ,;� rFR82(607), FR32(604), and specifications as referred to in 'o0. x,,; Intended Uses '(^ r,,_;^: ?57+,. 4 ref 'FR50(605), AIL FIRE-RATED .'pro ,Applicable-Standards. Inasmuch as k. D ` �:" ++--ducts meetMotor 'Vehicle Satety ;RALPH WILSON PLASTICS COM 1 . :WILSONART FIRE-RATED HPDL - - .< -..is intended for application where fire '-Standard302/Flammability and part COM- PANY has no control over end pro- •.`N m - '_280.203, par. 5 of HUD Fed. Reg. ducts fabricated with the materials r- -'codes specify such matenals. '. - ��3 D ,;(1975) .Flame ,Spread for Moble sold no warranty is expressed or :.mg Basic Limitations: „:'^ "a ;> Z -;.Homes. #607 meets MIL-STD-1623 implied. -" , "i WILSONART FIRE-RATED lama ,.(SHIPS) fire performance standard '� ,r-> .nates are intended solely for indoor '#604 meets Parts A,B and Cand#607 �• PRODUCT MAINTENANCE: use and should be protected from ex ,,:.,;;meets Part C of 191 FAA, Part 25.853, decorative surface may be �r^ tremes in temperature and/or ',"Aircraft Compartment Interior ,, readily cleaned with warm water and ^humidity. =• fr '-standards. - mild soaps such as used for hands or ;:di abrasive cleansers or - Composition of Product 4, -INSTALLATION: - ,, ,. dishes. Use of Decorative surfaces are produced "special" cleansers should be avoid ( P :,;,WILSONART decorative laminate :ed because they may contain abra ; using abrasion-resistant melamine -must be bonded to plywood,particle 'sives, acids or alkalines. Stubborno resin. Special kraft core sheets are board, or flaked board of reliable „stains may be removed with organic '. used behind the decorative face to V- quality using adhesives and tech- solvents or 2 minutes' exposure to a $ ' obtain the desired thickness. This niques 'recommended by the hypochlorite bleach such as"Clorox" ' ® special kraft core sheet is impregnat- adhesive manufacturer. LOKWELDo followed by a clean water rinse. m ap09 'ed with phenolic resin and contains ,_Brand contact adhesives are avail- - > chemical additives to control 8. TECHNICAL SERVICES: able should this type adhesive meet combustion. -the required bonding conditions. ` Each distribution center has train .> - Specification Data: -Care should betaken to assure that ed personnel conversant with the fab- FIRE-RATED Laminate Sheets 'excessive moisture imbalance be- rication of WILSONART products. Sizes (nominal inches): - "tween the WILSONART decorative Technical Services are also rendered _Widths: 36" 48" and 60" -;>laminate and the substrate does not from the Quality Assurance Labora- Lengths: 96", 120" and 144 ?':exist.A compromise climate for fabri tory in Temple, Texas. METALCOR Panels :``cation would be 75° F. and 45% RH 'Technical service may be needed Decorative laminate should be stored concerning type of WILSONART Size (nominal inches): HPDL required. Ordering informa- Width: 48"; Length: 96" under drier conditions than the sub- tion should always state:possible. - NOTE: Product #958 METALCOR strate when p1.) Flame spread-fuel-smoke data only is also available in: Width: 36"; - Square-cut inside corners should required by code. - Lengths: 96", 120" and 144" be avoided. All inside corners should 2,) Whether data need be for assem- FIRE-RATED Panels have radius and all edges should be bled laminate or unbonded, and, Size (nominal inches): routed smooth. Avoid use of 3.)Type of certification needed —UL Width: 48"; Lengths: 96" and 120" WILSONART FIRE-RATED decor- label, independent laboratory letter Thickness: ative laminate as a structural or self-certification by manufacturer. - member. Type Thickness (nominal inches): Methods: - 604 0.032" ± .005" Fabrication of components should 605 0.050" ± .005" be made using approved methods. 607 0.060" ± .005" Assembled pieces should meet specifications of NAPF (National 264 0.030" ± .003" Association of Plastic Fabricators),,.,; and ANSI-161.2-1979 where appli- cable. TDISTRIBUTION CENTERS ABLE 1 — FIRE RATINGS - ATLANTA '- . FLAME SPREAD-FUEL-SMOKE DATA 224 Rio Circle a , NEMA >RWP � ':I;-BONDED - T` BONDED '` '-° Decatur, GA 30030 a . TYPE PRODUCT UNBONDED TO ACB• TO FRPB { (404) 377 a: BOSTON 0731 T FR32 " '. 604 -- 30 0-45 10-0-5 15 5 15 r < r 51 Concord Street °{ s FR50 `,':: 605 a; `30-0-50 110-0-5 15-5 15 �„ �,. North Reading MA 01864 `'t, ..(617) 662-9700 FR62 607 +, 10-0-50 10-0 5 15-5 15 ' (617) 664-5230 2644 20 CHICAGO ."20 00 Chase Avenue " 15-0-5 :':15-0 5 .Not applicable "'' "��' - Elk Grove Village IL 60007 "'` (312) 437-1500 ,tRefers to all METALCOR LAMINATE PANELS -" (312) 569-2758 'ACB=asbestos cement board or other incombustible substrate. `FRPB —fire-rated particleboard such as Duraflake with U L rating 25 10-25 COLUMBUS .,.�.ssu sr*Adhesive used is resorcinol 1758,Westbelt Drive nz;,ti r ; Test data obtained by ASTM E84(80) tunnel test method Listed by Underwriters s, Columbus, OH 432 vsr ,� w'.T•Laboratories.- , wa>..rfi1�1b,>.c ,t..:, <{,:,. „ < „.i- ,'s- x„(614) 876-1515 , NOTE Listed below are-various panel compositions and their fire test results ,i '' DENVER e4 ''_�'�� `P ` $a determined by an independent laboratory'The values may vary .1.� « n9900-G Nome Street s`ts� iyµN,. . rE° s de endm on fabrication and laborato tesbn K °° `'a` Denver,CO 80239 *� "(303) 373-0286 `FIRE TES ,.DETROIT -13281 Merriman Road ,,. COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY iM , k Fv �'�{t+ -' a ,Livonia, MI 48150 ` ata s So. Hamilton St. �.1 `� " .4 'x(313) 425-7920 -L Dalton, GA 30720 - - - '�" ` OS ANGELES . . -,. . '..13911 E. Gannet Street'. R :rTYPE ..SUBSTRATE ADHESIVE FLAME :.FUEL SMOKE UBC BBC SBCC NEPA :Santa Fe Springs, X107 3/8 FR P B Tbontact -� 60 -' 45 35 ;11 II B -B ':(213) 771-8141 i a +..1 rb`: r -,ra, s - ^' .v : , . . -:;? u '(2 3) 921-7426 °:..07 '3/8" 45# P B :`,PVAc 165 145 .175 111 III -•. C '. (714) 523-1200 MIAMI 107 3/8 P.B. Contact 190 140 130 III III C� C 315 West 75th Place n107 Unbonded — 100 75 --35 III III - C "C Hialeah, FL 33014 _ (305) 822-5140 3353/8" F.R. P B ",Contact ,J60 - - -40 30 11 II B NEW YORK 1 Brenner Drive 335 3/6" P. " ` =Contact -x165 145 '. 135 III III C . 'C Congers, NY 10920 - 335 3/8" 45# P B 'PVAc 195 135 115 III III C C (914) 268-4171 (212) 933-1035 �s "335 3/8" F.R. P B -'-:'Borden's/ . 20 30 '=' 25 •I 1 A A ARCHITECTURAL &,.,. DESIGN OFFICE Resorcinol 919 Third Avenue 335 Unbonded - 30 0 30 : II 'II B B New York, NY 10022 (212) 753-8686 350 3/8" P.B. "'Contact 170 135 155 III III C C (212) 753-8687 - 35d 3/8" 45# P B PVAc 190 145 150 111 III C -.0 PHILADELPHIA - 959 Bethel Avenue 350 3/8" F.R. P.B. Contact 55 45 55 11 11 B B Pennsauken, 08110 (609) 662-47477 , 350 Unbonded — 50 0 40 11 II B B (215) 923-5542 - 'Numbers given are an average of two separate tests. SAN FRANCISCO 1753 Sabre Street Hayward, CA 94545 UBC — Uniform Bldg. Code (415) 782-6055 BBC — Basic Bldg. Code SEATTLE - SBCC — Southern Bldg. Code Congress 20866 84th Avenue S. NFPA — National Fire Protection Association Kent, WA 98032 (206) 872-8070 TEMPLE 500 East Ridge Drive Temple, TX 76502 {,4xy, :y (817) 778-7391 3243-Wl14-84Y-20M (PRINTED IN U.S A) _ 7.r n TECHNICAL DATA WILSONART manufactures five types of FIRE- PRODUCT SPECIFICATION FABRICATION RATED high pressure decorative laminate. Specification of WILSONART FIRE-RATED Fabrication of WILSONART FIRE-RATED I #604 Vertical Surface Type. Nominal thickness Type decorative laminates must be based upon type products should be made using approved 0.04 Vertical Physical properties m l Chic exceed the following criteria (refer for assistance to methods.Assembled pieces should meet NEMA NEMA Standards Physical prop properties ee L rexce d the Fire Ratings Test Results Table below): standards as outlined in LD3-1980 publication. 1. Flame Spread rating and Smoke Developed With proper installation,FIRE-RATED Type #605 General Purpose Type. Nominal thickness rating as listed by applicable fire codes. Panels are recommended to cover plaster and 0.050"3.005". Physical properties meet or 2. Whether ratings are obtained for unbonded concrete walls as well as gypsum wallboard. exceed NEMA Standards FR50, per publication laminate or bonded panel. Further data on installation,fabrication.and LD3-1980. 3. Certification of lire rating by UL label,indepen- maintenance are available from WILSONART #607 General Purpose Type. Nominal thickness dent laboratory,or internal test only. distributors and from the Quality Assurance 0.060'x 0.005".Physical properties meet or Flame Spread and Smoke Developed data for Laboratory in Temple,Texas.Write or call:Ralph exceed NEMA Standard FR62.per publication products manufactured with WILSONART FIRE- Wilson Plastics Company,600 General Bruce Or., L03-1980. RATED type laminates vary with choice of sub- Temple,TX 76501. Phone: (817)778-2711, strate and adhesive,as well as with pressing TWX:910-890-5800. #264 Nondecoralive Backer. Nominal thickness conditions. Ranked from most to least fire-retar- 0.030"x.003".Not designated by NEMA type. dant,these factors are: WARRANTY: #900 Series METALCOR Extra Strength T PRESSING WILSONART FIRE-RATED Type decorative rating Type.All SUBSTRATE ADHESIVE CONDITIONS laminates and panel UHL,A meet fire ratings METALCOR thicknesses available.Not desig- standards of Ni UL ANS,and other con- nated by NEMA type. Incombustible Resorundl Hot Pressed cerned agencies listed above. All five products are classified by Underwriters For-luded PB Phenov Cold/Press/Long Inasmuch as WILSONART has no control over Laboratories, Inc..and carry labels specifying Resorunol end products fabricated with materials sold,no fire ratings in accordance with data bytest method Normal Particleboard Casein Cold Press/Long warranty is expressed or implied. ASTM-E84(80).Test is identical to that specified Normal Plywood Contact Nip Rolled WILSONART FIRE-RATED Type Panels and in ANS No.2.5,NFPA No.255, UL No.723.and WALL PANEL SYSTEMS meet commercial UBC No.42-1.See Fire Ratings Test Results. standards. Products#604,#605,#607 and METALCOR FIRE RATINGS TEST RESULTS meet Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 302/Flamma- bility,and Part 280.203.par.5,of HUD Fed.Reg. as tested by Underwriters Laboratories under Test Method ASTM-E84(80). (1975) Flame Spread for Mobile Homes. #607 meets MIL-STD-1623(SHIPS)fire perfor- MATERIAL TESTED FLAME SPREAD .FUEL CONTRIBUTED SMOKE DEVELOPED mance standard.#604 meets Parts A, B.and C and 4607 meets Part C,of 191 FAA, Part 25.853, "Aircraft Compartment Interior"standards. 604 on ACB' 10 0 5 COMPOSITION 605 on ACB 10 0 5 WILSONART FIRE-RATED decorative lami- 607 on ACB 10 0 5 nates are produced using abrasion-resistant 264 on ACB 20 10 0 melamine resin over special kraft coresheets.This METALCOR on ACBt 15 0 5 special kraft core is impregnated with phenolic - resin and contains chemical additives to control 604 on FRPB"' 15 5 15 combustion. 605 on FRPB 15 5 15 607 on FRPB 15 5 15 WILSONART FIRE-RATED Type Panels are 264 on FRPB 20 10 0 available in many compositions,each sandwiched to a fire-rated 454 density particleboard such as Durallake,with a UL rating of 25-10-25.Resor- t Refers to all METALCOR LAMINATE PANELS. cinol adhesive isused forbonding.Formoreinfor- 'ACB means asbestos-cement board or any other incombustible type substrate, malion on the various panel compositions,check FRPB means fire-rated particleboard such as Duraflake with UL rating of 25-10-25. with the Specialty Products Division in Temple,TX. - Adhesive used is Resorcinol. FIRE-RATED Type Panels and WALL PANEL FIRE TEST RESULTS SYSTEMS meet commercial standards ANSI-A- COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY, 1215 So.Hamilton St., Dalton,GA 30720 208.1.They are classified and labeled by UL File R6838 and File R5434.They are considered Class NOTE: Listed below are various panel compo- independent laboratory. The values may vary 1 (or A)and meet fire codes requiring flame sitions and their lire test results determined by an depending on fabrication and laboratory testing. spread of less than 25. AVAILABLE SIZES TYPE SUBSTRATE ADHESIVE FLAME FUEL SMOKE UBC BBC SBCC NFPA SPEC. FIRE-RATED decorative laminate sheets are trimmed oversized to allow fabricator to obtain desired dimensions. 107 3/8" F.R.P..B. Contact 60 45 35 II II B B 2B Widths:30",36".48",60" 107 3/8" 45#P.B. PVAc - 165 145 175 III 111 - C C 3C Lengths:72",96". 120", 144" 107 3/8"P.B. Contact 190 140 130 111 III C C 3C METALCOR:48"x96'"—standard size 107 Unbondetl — 100 15 35 -If III C C 38 NOTE: Product#958 only also available in. 335 3/8" F.R. P.B. Contact 60 40 30 11 II B B 213 Width:36 Lengths'.96", 120'r and 144" 335 3/8" P.B. Contact 165 145 135 111 III C C 3C ED PANELS: 335 3/8'45#P.B. PVAc 195 135 115 111 III C C 3C FIRE-RAT Width: ED Lengths:96" or 120" 335 3/8" F.R.P.B. Borden's/Resorcinol 20 30 25 1 1 A A 1A METALCOR PANELS.48"x 96"only 335 Unbondetl 30 0 30 11 II B B 26 FIRE-RATED particleboard in stock is 3/8'. 350 3/8" P.B. Contact 170 135 155 III 111 C C 3C thick.Other thicknesses available by a l order 350 3/8" 450 P.B. PVAc 190 145 150 111 III C C 3C include 1/2 5/8"and 3/4". 350 3/8'" F.R. P.B. Contact 55 45 55 11 11 B B 2B- 350 Unbonded — 50 0 40 11 II 6 B 26 FINISH 604 3/8' F . P.8. Borden's/Resorcinol 10 15 15 1 1 A A 1A Finish on FIRE-RATED type sheets is#6, tex- 607 3/8" F.R. P.B. Borden's/Resorcinol 10 15 35 1 1 A A 16 tured,a nonduectional surface with a moderate rel lechve quality and a glossomeler reading o1 7.0. METALCOR hmsh is a textured finish. UBC— Uniform Bldg.Code PRODUCT USE BBC— Basic Bldg,Code SBCC—Southern Bldg.Code Congress WILSONART FIRE-RATED Type decorative NFPA— National Fire Protection Assoc , laminate sheets and panel boards are intended ��Q for use where fire codes specify or environment //Ilu0m r0n01RX recommends a fire and smoke-resistant decora- i��"`I tive surface.They are manufactured for interior WILSONART BRAND DECORATIVE LAMINATE use,and should be protected from temperature Copyright, 1982 Ralph Wilson Plastics Co. and humidity extremes. 600 General Bruce Drive,Temple,Texas 76501 Manufacturers of Wdsonart Decorative Laminates, 4244-W226-83Y-t00M (PRINTED IN U.S.A.) Specialty Grade Laminates,Lokweld Contact Adhesives. FINISH @ CEILING (in dining/carryout only) Interior Texture Finishes set the stage for your designs The decorating trend is to textures.Without costing a fortune, they satisfy the popular demand for distinctive interior styling `y y i� t'y )! '�'�i * �.�f:,� n r q +1'fj i_.. i —flattering finishes,customized interiors and rustic surfaces that simulate natural materials. U.S.Gypsum texture finishes offer a palette of patterns for a vari- ety of esthetic effects.Textures and patterns in paste or powder %'/�:,r!. - - :fid,r�A �� + " - .•1 products can be mixed or matched to contrast,complement or RED TOP Acoustical Texture provides an attractive.monolithic. accent elements in your interior design scheme. sound-absorbing surface. U.S.Gypsum textures are economical,too.They often cost lessx�a^' to apply than paint because they go on quicker.Textures also hide minor surface blemishes to reduce surface preparation time.Products include: es•"�v v':.,;'�",.=��'r. "r "`-*- .J USG ACOUSTICAL PLUS Texture—an exclusive spray texture for finishing interior concrete and conventional plaster ceilings and non-contact walls.Asbestos-free,safe to handle and use in new construction and renovation.Provides an attractive rough- Surface designs available with Spray Texture Finish include textured,sound absorbing,fire-resistant surface.Sound rated: tog-and-spatter(above)and spatter-knockdown(below). NRC.40 at 1/?thickness,up to.60 at 1"thickness.Dries to a hard, non-flaking finish. Provides exceptional hide and leveling IF qualities;fills holes,conceals rough spots and joinings to elimi- nate most concrete surface preparation.Surface burning charac- teristics: flame spread 20, smoke developed 40. Light 6¢ i"r'd,_, r4u t`"i •g �' reflectance:.56 avg. RED TOP Acoustical Texture—an exclusive spray texture for finishing gypsum panels, interior concrete and plaster ceilings. Asbestos-free,safe to handle and use in new construction and Monterey or knock-down,orange peel,fog coat and others can be renovation. Provides a natural-white,evenly-textured,fire- readily created with roller,brush or spray gun.Its handsome resistant,sound-rated finish. For use on non-contact surfaces finish can be left unpainted on remote non-contact surfaces, only.Sound rated:NRC.50 for gypsum panels, .55 for concrete, when an adquate amount of material is applied to provide suffi- .55 forconventional plaster,at 1/!'texture thickness. tient hiding properties,or overpainted for protection against IMPERIAL QT and E-Z SPRAY Texture Finishes—aggregated soiling. non-asbestos powder,produces acoustical finish appearance on USG Spray Texture Finish—a top performance, non-asbestos ceilings; provides no acoustical correction.Excellent bonding powder product, available aggregated or unaggregated. Fast qualities;helps conceal surface defects. Formulated with poly- drying; offers good concealment and superior coverage. styrene aggregates for spray application in super-coarse,coarse, Produces light spatter,fog-and-spatter and orange peel finishes medium or fine textures.White only.Apply a prime coat of a with machine spray and light stipple texture with roller applica- good quality,undiluted white interior flat latex paint over entire tion in most interior wall and ceiling surfaces.Highly effective surface before texturing.Surface burning characteristics:flame_ on sidewalls.Tinting not recommended:readily overcoated with rnot ad 5,smoke developed 0 forpolystyrene-aggregated formu- most wall paints.Not washable unpainted. n applied over SIIEETROCK Bran G sum Pane IS.Limitation: USG Texture XII Drywall Surfacer—a non-asbestos powder prod- ecommen a or use w ere constant ami conditions ex- uc[,mixed with water,for fast,low-cost spray application to m- terior gypsum drywall surfaces.Available aggregated for sand Multi-Purpose Texture Finish—an economical,unaggre- finish.Combines easy mixing,fast drying,excellent coverage gated, non-asbestos powder product for producing light to and good concealment.An ideal base for wall paints;may be left medium-light textures on drywall or other interior surfaces. unpainted on ceilings when an adequate amount of material is Textured effect obtained by brush,roller or spray application. applied to provide sufficient hiding properties. Helps conceal minor surface defects.Dries to a soft-tone while SHEETROCK First Coat—a non-asbestos powder product,mixed finish. Should be over-painted on walls,may be left unpainted with water, for fast, low-cost application with brush.roller or on ceilings when an adequate amount of material is applied to spray,to interior gypsum panels,wood and concrete surfaces. provide sufficient hiding properties.Not washable unpainted. Equalizes surface absorption to minimize decorating problems USG Quik&EasyTs'Ready-to-Use Wall and Ceiling Texture and provide good paint adhesion,superior hiding. Dries in less —white,non-asbestos,latex-type material for interior surfaces, than 30 minutes to a hard,'while finish.In 25 Ib.bags for easy offers super-thickness with the speed of a ready-mixed formula- handling,convenient storage at jobsile. lion and a one-coat application.Develops a durable surface with USG Powder joint Compounds—(All Purpose or Topping)—easy. minimal to no fissuring.Excellent hiding over gypsum panels, mixing,smooth-working products than can be used to produce . concrete,primed plaster, masonry and non-staining wood sur- attractive light to medium textures.Color is while hu( may vary faces.Can be job-mixed with a variety of aggregates for greater in degree of whiteness. Surfaces should be. painted. Hand. coverage and applied with brush, roller, spray or trowel for a applied with brush rollerortrowel. rangeof textureeffects.Overpainl if desired. USG Ready-Mixed joint Compounds(Topping or All Purpose.) USG Ready-Mixed Texture Compound—a white, non-asbestos. —virtually ready to use, these products will produce textures latex-type material for interior surfaces,offers the speed and ranging from light to medium depending upon method of appli- convenience of ready-mix formulation. Provides extra tough and cation.Color is white but may vary.Surfaces should be painted. durable finish.Attractive textures,such as stomp or crow's foot, Hand-applied with brush,roller or trowel. elIt Ty,�, m f'�l ...4-wit� 11 oZl, RI It �11. 010 0 0 0,0 0�'ll 0, to�0,:O,0,— CL, VIM6 ItuU Nl MAP 13 la. Z�ll I I�7,V-vv 4N7 011%, k .......... "i 1 Flo $19 C* rA 0 0 C c I V' Ip t 7- 0,A 3E I .. —..W T jo"Lal VC a 0w. 0 210 O 0 0.. 3.0 '1Z W C 0 W a i Fr 1�3 1 3;i A�t N Mw 61 ZflyyW:t 'i;A. ..... P L..,p OP/OVERALL PRODUCT IN PLACE 3 Glasbord® frp flat panel ;. Description a Glasbord frp panel is a quick-cleaning interior finish � y that also stands up to heavy impact. Made of fiberglass �, I all xk,{xP reinforced plastic, it is superior to tile, metal, and Y?v painted surfaces. It provides the easy maintenance of k tile at considerably less cost. It does not corrode or dent as metal does and never needs paint- > ✓,�1� ..:. .>rr`�Y"�:" ing. The panel is used on walls and ceilings of '.. food/meat processing plants and other types �- s W, of,of, buildings where maintenance and sanita- 1"ffi•'/, '�' i3'+s tion are a problem. �- 'Product Types: x 7. Glasbord-P — A premium panel which meets §; minimum flammability requirements for all major x-•--• � : -' '" model building codes for interior finish use. ;;:� Fire-X Glasborl New, improved fire retardant panel o- yrs Class A fire rated. Fire-X Glasbord is recommended for 'Q applications where safety to human life is critical,such as ty _ hospitals, nursing homes, commercial kitchens, ander. :v -:,. high-rise buildings. { s1 x Glasbord-R — Acrylic modified for maximum weatherability. For use in exterior applications. '" _ Benefits: . Tough — The panel is highly resistant to impact, and the embossed surface resists scratches and abrasion. . 4 . Easy to Clean—The impervious surface allows dirt and grease to be cleaned off quickly and easily. Being frp, it is extremely resistant to most stains and chemicals. Government Accepted—Glasbord frp paneling is accepted by USDA for use in federally inspected meat plants. MolstureResistant—The total pane lismoistureresistant,notjustthe surface. This impervious material does not support mold or mildew, and it will not rust or Corrode. Easy to Install—Glasbord paneling cuts and drillseasily with modern = , gk -'Y ,z carbide-tipped equipment. MUSES AND APPLICATIONS: _ 11 '4 ' l •' ` Use Glasbord flat panel wherever sanitation, durability, and low maintenance are important: 1. Meat processing room walls 2. Fast food kitchen 3. Low temperature freezer walls a ' SIZES, THICKNESSES & COLORS: " J ' Ztl 'r:^{"r; •tr ? ,= flame spread - - .white 0.09" 0.7 lb. BES385P Class C 4'x8',9',10',12' white 0.12" 1.0 Ib. -� BES485P Glasbord-P anterior! long lengths telling panels beige 0.09" .. 0.71b. BES370P ",,,,.,frp panel smoke developed g 2'x2', 2'x4' under 450 beige 0.12" 1.0 Ib. BES470P r ame spread 4'x8',9',10',12' ' Fire-X Glasbord " class A White 0.09" 0.8 Ib. BES385FX "' interiors long lengths z•, °:x. Illpanel smoke 20eceiling panels developed _ 2,x2, 2,x4, beige 0.09"' 0.81b. BES370FX s ame spread interior' Glasbord-R claaac or 4'x8',9',10',12' colonial 006 041b BEsz83R' . :,,.frp panel smoke developed exterior Jong lengths white i .� 'under 450 v+,`ya "(1) Smoke developed is considerably lower than minimum requirement for building codes (2) Per building codes (3) other colors available by quote - - _ /Il OP/OVERALL PRODUCT IN PLACE 9.17/Dy cempIy fsurfaced p p r anal Description: " ,�a. r Kemply is a wood substrate with a tough, hard, # �' }„ ;; embossed Glasbord frp panel laminated to one or both sides. This .05" thick, Class C rated, fiberglass I Icy 3 reinforced plastic surface provides a durable,easy-to- maintain interior finish. It's ideal for use in areas where cleanliness is Kemply required. K�t1 q p y panel has structural strength and rigidity. It may be installed directly to a stud wall. Surface: a• I�f The surface is a combination of chopped .j'' fiberglass roving and polyester resin that I f provides a hard, durable, highly cleanable ,v ay finish. x Substrate: a ft r ` ` ru Plywood (APA, CD exterlor).Othersubstrates such as foam,particle board,dry wall,etc.are available depending on suitability. Inquiries are welcomed. - Q Benefits: • Structural strength • Installs like regularwood paneling • Easyto clean • USDA accepted • Scratch and abrasion resistant • Does not retain odors stResists mild acids and alkaline solution '-,_ «•--"', �',, n "'i+ ,rtx+ ' e ,- • Minimal maintenance - °` MUSES AND APPLICATIONS: " yt Kemply panels are recommended for installation where sanitation, i m , as well as structural strength, is important: 1. Food processing assembly room walls.(Glasbord wainscot further protects heavy abuse areas.) ^•+ 4Y �w:3+'A-,'Hv '"-' „ �.�,.,a.;x� 2. Flower cooler walls. 3. Cold storage cooler exterior as well as interior walls. a. `lV )qtr SIZES, THICKNESSES & COLORS: lamY -P31 (5/16") .36"E085 a. . . Kemply E085-P50 white .50" (1/2") .55" 1.7 Ib. 1.4 oz. Irp surfaced 4'x 8' E085-P63 .63" (5/8") ' .68" 2.0 Ib. - -" E085-P75 .75" (3/4") .80" 2.4 Ib. e,r,paneling 4' x 10' E070-P31 beige .31" (5/16") .36" 1.3 lb. ^'r 1.4 oz. Other panel sites,surface Thicknesses,and calors available by quotation. a V Y ' r 4 - • . - -t y TS/TECHNICAL SUPPORT =' } 4 '} Flexural Strength (PSI) 25 x 1W ua;r +"'-'25 x 10' x { 28,0 x 1W •'r Flexural Modulus (PSI) it, � 7r r a u. :, X1.0 x 10° a� r �' ,g'0.9 x 10° �'-08 x 10° . .Tensile Strength (PSI) �a��. ^ca `12 x 103 ; A�.,, n,410 9 X 103 0 X 103 Tensile Modulus (PSI) � T atlyw.k "m Mme„ - ^' 1.6 X 106 , i,'.{"'k1 6 X 10° r+, ` 1.2 X 10° Impact Strength (IZOD)r4' , `R^ w' `"n''3y` *Zrp e 13 . t.. pry w.,�,�.•.12 fix:, a 12 �.(ft. Ibslin notched) T ' vt' BarcotHardness 3•ar -.;^ ,r- t 55 > '� : ' 55 Coefficient of Linear-M, ;ty' ` 1 0 1 5 x 10 ° k 1 4 x 10 ° - Expansion (InlinJ°F x 10°) �', > V •ti y :a<<, d31,. Water,4bsorphon (Np)'(24 hrs @ 77 F) 0 2 a yk• i ��, 0 38 „� .1 Specific Gravity .k • 'x'" tt<x 1> x r1:8.�-s°. _` 1 8 y 1 .r The substrate used to make Kemply is grade CD exterior .)< : Kemply®paneling: plywood with the same waterproof glue line as marine grade v panels and follows the standards set by the American Plywood Association. The properties of tensile strength and impact strength of these panels are increased with the addition of the fop surface. * AI/AVAILABILITY INSTALLATION AC/AVAILABILITY COST �; � REQUEST DETAILED INSTALLATION GUIDE, FORM #855. SHIPPING: Glasbord,Fire-X Glasbord,and Kemply panels in 4'x8%4'x 9',4'x1Oil and 4'x12 sizes areshlppedflaton CC/CODE ACCEPTABILITY CERTIFICATION r skids. Long length Glasbord flat panels ora generally coiled + and shipped on 44 square skids *� t + Y�v r,.4• '. - r,*vli`,'r _.. .«3)u`"S.,s,�,r, „3'>G"t'f.3 x . 4 Glasbord-P, Fire-X Glasbord, and Kemply panels: _ °STORAGE: All Glasbord products should be stored . 0 USDA accepted „indoors. When outside storage is necessary, cover and • Meet FDA requirements protect from the weather and exposure to sunlight. Prior to • Cleanable as No. 3 finish on stainless steel installation,panels should be re stacked on solid flat surface ��} Glasbord-P panel meetsminimum requirements forall major F to minimize package distortion model building codes. Flame spread less than 200'(Class C) COST Contact Dyrot cJ or your nearest distributor for A smoke developed under 450. complete pncmg Informabon `k Sty j� Fire-X Glasbord panel: . - • UL Classified. Flame Spread 20 (Class A), smokefxx . developed 200 (per ASTM E-84) DI/DISTRIBUTIONI �x `} z, & t • U.S.Testing Company Inc., test results on live animalsshow the smoke from toxic than that of ed oak. X Glasbord panel to be less ' • FM approved. Subject to the conditions of approval h PP 1 k t ��r ; a ... ,,,-•as.r as described in FM Report J.I. OF9A3.AM • New York City MEA 61-78M Vol. II -, Glasbord-R panel meets Life Safety codes. Factory Mutual test results: flame spread 70*, smoke developed under 450 y Thread on the back of the panel identifies Glasbord frp flat panels: ' • Glasbord-P panel — black thread J • Fire-X Glasbord panel — red and blue threads • Glasbord-R panel — red thread Copies of tests/certifications are available on request. �-+ ` x v; *n othernume ateriial am under rating is conot ditions, toreflect hazards presented bythisorby - any other material untler actual lire contlitions. ; NONWARRANTY: We believe at l informal ion given is accurateit is offered in good - 7 faith.but without guarantee.Sincecondilions of use are beyond our control,all risks are assumed by the user.Nothing herein shall be construed as a recommendation for + uses which infringe valid patents or as extending a license under valid patents. 71— NOTICE: Like other organic building materials(eg.wood),panels made of liber- Nxeuvxnuasas OF DUALITY COR TCC AND vaooucra grass reinforced plastic resins are combustible and should be used in compliance - - - with local building codes and insurance regulations. Glasbord,Fire-X Glasbord,Kemply,and Thread on the back of the panel i t Reg.U.S.Pat.Off. 01983 Dyrotech Industries,Inc. Printed in U.S.A. - FORM NO. 894D a� ti VfI1�Y IlV +iV tlV tti lr�A wrtA At l�Sfk tllFa It \i4 a.,4 S. ra�ht✓* : lP +: ksF`I is .hr l y .__ - TERNATE - y>; �• . as Y rYt I f rl t )nll3J; 1 ill ce b1 K r '"r•:- ' re. v�. r i ,m.,. r kr . .ALI� t 111 i t 5 , v, : ,+ e . 1 't l ' ' - t T11t1 +�r +~\�t 1 I s i3 t ro t '.i i I_ �J .r•� yds A �C �-':•'-s W LL rINISH 1 , ,{ KITCHENt( X Pt la 'il Vl i {f ♦Yt t i 17 � t '4 Ib .4 ' F f 4- • ' � '� , l IyY F t 1 1s bl 1 t v Ivi Ai 1 I t n I f -'i • r � I' f :� S t4 � t sc 1 z i t ;y i � { r I � tlFtilt IIF r�Isrryrlll ll( 1� Ix 1 _I 1 V ,YCO{` 8 .a} c31lfr e. 1 1'` a 't)I5 r ra'rkf d a N a F 'di i 1 1st .� i 1 - �tl :S 1t `r fr'fl G� 1tl as BL.oR�T .:l � t}I , � 1 � � , t 111�ti1 lift - r Is + x ( j"�: a• 1 .!' Il-1 I,t 4 t 1�Y'� ;G r _ t iYtllt frp'�fla-pac�el } t"Y F4 t t)P,1 yy t t r s 1 2 ,I, Y Irl ,;l1 lnlli rk'.t `� �I °i(:. Jl Il li llty[r tri tlF`i; S\ Y a t i 4 1 Lrt I{ut t I' 1 l 1 V I LI i t hin'l � l�lf7 ' llytlti 1 (ti11 � ! It a 15i f A I 1 F 1 Sa- I vs c-�lr� i � tv F r v 4 4 J hi y C. At x ! 4�•. I 4 i w[ i�1lt A t1I 3 bXlt i [ jrrf b: t }If t4F tell 7111'1 t'r G 1'I cIF r ! (rY ' , l 1_ tl y er It i !1 r s( � 1 � vI 1 ' f fSj 2r(i f l sfl ��siii� {[ t r i s l i rt I I Y si Is„ i^ ua F, Jta�yl vrtsl i' l jl � rJ' iY,�r"`'- 'vtt tlry l y � 1 tl' t 1Yl��111 i - & 1 (, li lYrs krfilr { tllrk _ ➢ -A. t2x Ill ( .}fF 1A J IP Ifs i15 11 'i u' it I Iki� fiV11 e`f (t i IN f r Pit" la I 1! K 5 n L ZL Illi ahl{{til lr l)I i /ri Fi)(ll � � 1 cfrr y,, �r �g �x { sy v t •��,+9' � �< n I �t ljoll re A' ill`I i4' Ulti 19^(r b ,ICi` }T f,K � _ o-: � .`lY� kv ........I.f l)} s MlYw I n' I, i set' 4 + v1 1 r,�til I lrr�r i� 'ti t�ru`I aq- 13 F 1 r! t l5w 'F x 777 Ir r If III.. { 'ur �I11 t hrt , ii ,yirh (II 1 I1) [fl r 11 C< k Fi A . } t S r {l'� tlr �!I¢p�Jw <xr 19 45, ZI r !ft 1➢ r 4// 1 s lis Fci r ' s r 5 +� §t litr� safL If1 sl r y fK tJ" f� r M! !� rT`f r r +f '115. Yr 1• { i1 l t .iP�P i�1 i i sr r Irl y r i Y ` r� r�lliy fw rr ll"rr(u ' ( ri +fa k i r}F: bra [�,(r� a5 ♦ r }r1 Yl if r (I " . 1 llw 2 .. r e( if r,. , f },IF I t 1 r� nn ♦ x x � `�fifr fl' { '" rl ff� flf SIA/AFI )(r it fAJly4r'L Nf�F 3: ° s C !` m '. s. +tl ry. Ir ! Ili Jl 11 f 1. rl 1 f-fc.�t �fl ri ! )S 1 rtii k ' I f �. .I..... r- FF 1 - Irrt x. 1i � /S .fF lr r + :.Jl zr .+ r/ 4{1I t✓'I � e n i Ytr I dr r t r I Rl t l I 1 1 KENIL4TEKCORAORATION a 29 gfro�gsoa3a�: `.: fiberglebsr�nfiorcetS plastic .' J ih*c�zl�gf��~�'� l Q7 'i vire Corporau6n;Gla;bond Reg U.S Pae:Ofi 1 KY y t l :!r_ A Two minutes ®f'TORCH TEST"proved s- LOW SMOKE FIRE-X GLASSOR®® frp panel is true to its name. - - A special apparatus was constructed to test the known types of frp paneling-tra- ditional and fire rated -and the new low smoke Fire-X Glasbord panel by Kemlite . in a simulated fire situation.The results of this test are as follows: TEST CHAMBER (Top view) 00:00 00:15 f— tsn^ ,�1 _-L{ i:• w 1. T JEA'iT't �a E%fTr LXIT 1 E%!T 2E41Tc,, . E%IT SIGN _ TEST e I I '�" y= tlFA Y• > SAMPLE ! r i tFlame,approximately 2200°F,is applied Panels A and B have ignited. Panel C is T to traditional frp panel (A),fire rated panel- not yet burning. ing (B) and low smoke Fire-X Glasbord `.-.. - s•• I panel (C),shown,left to right. -: — 00:45 01:15 r _ vLtarEr �v,E%IT`>I`t .;LSE%R"" GLASS .� P ,•klrtilui`u) uf,rt ray -1; PROPANE 1 - TORCH IN auary .-1- POSITION ' � I Panel C ignites. Note volume of dense' Panel A is engulfed in flames. Panel B is black smoke coming from Panels and B. burning freely.Panel Cis burning slowly withZZ ® _ No smoke can be observed from Panel C. very little light gray smoke. - 01:45 02:00 l y, . � �ffij IFfr - rt411'r l J 1 � ~ 1' ,.EXITJ J O /��rµµlf 141r 44 J.rt Ir `J(• f >f V r r 2( n t•YI ys1 d: LOW SMOKE FIRE-X Source of fire is removed. Panel B imme- Enveloping flames of Panel A must be FRP FLAT PANELINGtliately ceases to burn. Panel A continues to extinguished. Panel C ( low smoke Fire*X burn aid to smoke heavily. Panel C ( low Glasbord)ceasestoburnon itsown,still with Fire Hazard Classification Smoke Fire-X Glasbord) burns slowly with smoke scarcely visible. only traces of light smoke developing. by Underwriters' Laboratories per ASTM E-84: Flame spread . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Fuel contributed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Smoke developed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 TOXICITY:Tests by an independent laboratory showed that while low smoke Fire-XGlasbord paneling will burn-as will all frp and many other paneling materials-its smoke produced a low level of irritation, lower even than southern pine. Only slight traces of carbon monoxide could be detected from the gaseous fraction.The condensable fraction was 99.18%water. LOW SMOKE FIRE-X GLASBORD® TECHNICAL DATA AVAILABILITY Sizes Product Color Finish Nominal Nominal Number Thickness Weight/Sq. Ft. 4'x 8',4'x 10' Widths:48"&96" BES385-X White Embossed 0.09" 0.7 Ib. Lengths: 5'to 45' - Ceiling panel sizes: BES485-X White Embossed 0.12" 0.9 lb. 2'x 2',2'x 4' - PHYSICAL PROPERTIES - Flexural Strength (PSI). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16— 24 x 103 Flexural Modulus (PSI). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.6-0.9 x 106 Tensile Strength (PSI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 — 12 x 103 Tensile Modulus (PSI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . 1.0 — 1.5 x 106 Impact Strength (IZOD) (ft. lbs./in. notched) . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 9— 14 Barcol Hardness . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50— 60 , Coefficient of Expansion (in./in./e F). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 —3.4 x 10-5 INSTALLATION - - - - Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord paneling in- surface should be free of bumps, projections, Panels are easily worked with portable stalls similarly to most building panels. It can and misalignments. Rough or badly misaligned power equipment. Carbide tipped tools are be applied to furring strips or directly to block concrete block walls should be furred for best recommended for best results. Panels require predrilling for either nails or screws. Use or poured concrete walls. It can also be install- appearance.Studded walls should also be align. nonrusting,noncorroding type fasteners. ed directly over a stud framed wall. Method ed before installing panels. Care should betaken to seal the joints with an accepted sealant or caulking(we recommend a silicone-type) to assure a moistureproof of installation must be in conformance with - installation. Moldings add to the finished When installing long lengths of paneling, local building codes. - appearance and aid in making a watertight always begin at one end of the panel and work To assure a pleasing, flat appearance,wall installation. toward the other. SHIPPING: Standard-size panels are generally stacked and wrapped with NONWARRANTY: The facts stated and the recommendations made corrugated board and secured to a skid with steel strapping.For additional herein are based on our own research and/or the research of others and protection when necessary,the stack may receive are believed to be accurate.No guaranty of their accuracy is made, how- - a waterproof outer wrapper. Long length ever, and unless otherwise expressly provided in written contract, the - panels are generally coiled on skids for easiest products discussed are sold without conditions or warranties,express or shipment, implied. Purchasers should make their own tests to determine the suit- STORAGE: Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord ability of such products for their particular purposes. Nothing contained a panels should be stored indoors. They must be herein shall be construed to be a recommendation to use or as a license stored on edge to prevent accumulation of moisture between the panels to operate under or to infringe any existing patents. which can cause water marks. Panels should also be protected from exposure to sunlight. NOTICE: Like otherorganic building materials(e.g.wood),panels made - of fiber glass reinforced plastic resins are combustible and should be CERT!F!CATION::Low Smoke Fire-X Glasbord paneling is accepted used in compliance with local building codes and insurance regulations. by the i S.D.A. and is proven to be as cleanable as a No. 3 finish on stainless steel. LOOK FOR .`the threads on the back —your assurance it's Kemllte's -KEMLITE CORPORATION flip flat paneL.A,combination.of blue and red threads identifies low smoke Fire-X G6ibord paneling: - - " P. O. Box 429,Joliet, Illinois 60434 LOOK FOR-:_. the UL label_ort low.smoke, fire rated panels — your Telephone: 815/725 1112 (Joliet) assurance of certified panels. 312/242-4827 (Chicago) Form No.803 Rev. - Printed in U.S.A. Low smoke Fire-x Glasbord. frp paneling Now, for the first time...the low maintenance and long life of frp wall and ceiling panels with r increased safety. A property never before available in frp building panels: low smoke development. an answer to the No. 1 cause of all deaths in building fires — asphyxiation by smoke and gases.* ' Arid, low smoke Fire-X Glasbord paneling has the same outstand- . scratch and abrasion resistant ing qualities that have made Kemlite's Glasbord panel a standard . nonporous,stain resistant building material in many industries,including meat/food processing . easily cleaned and agriculture. It's a tough,hard,durable fiberglass reinforced plastic . moisture resistant material with an embossed,pebble-like finish for extra wear resistance. . high impact strength ?ns. . mildewproof,rustproof N^ . easily installed . low maintenance required f Ion ' These photographs illustrate some of the many - � . g range g economy places where low smoke Fire-X Glasbord paneling . U.S.D.A.accepted is ideal for use and adds a safety factor: Meat plant walls of Kemlite paneling have a permanent finish.No more flaking paint. No Fast food kitchen area cleans up quick and easy.There more chipped plaster. is no grout to fail or to harbor dirt as with ceramic tile. 4 ik Isfjk tl i x r1 J.1 'iesr3�r u'tz x! + ,9.3a p;/ F�', Jr1J I7A r� T {:s ^' i✓� A J6��y�r„_Ir AL., ^"3'1 w"' �vf ,� �.t Y � � ....`�,• :.: r ��w {} !+' r k 1 i7 >+e`` r',� " .��1h„S„�tti {1r it rfrr ' fk 4 �Y 1-wo w L 1...• �'� 'i10,31.� a1 ��:/�aa.i�3riv;.� ,,t`�� Ewa f 1 r ✓�' G T.,./ 11I ”".S 11 Nr�• y' G'. I rv^.- �y{y� ♦ �k] e. } ! i >' Pol!@ P I !f r - �; !�— f aT m - )t e ., m 't J fir + Mfi�O4�. u..W' .1.r.. :.� G��w•tu9 Kemlite paneling takes the daily abuse and One piece, floor-to ceiling prefabricated Lunchroom walls and ceiling are easy to keep clean and stays new-looking. . .ends your painting/re- panels make installation easier and drastically require minimal maintenance. painting problems. reduce the number of seams to seal and fasten. (Installations shown are of Standard and Fir..X Glasbord paneling.) Use low smoke Fire-X Glasbord flat panel in: INSTITUTIONS Hospitals - Nursing Homes Laboratories Laundry rooms Schools y WallsKitchens Workshops Correctional centers (' Ceilings !,'y Cafeterias Waiting rooms PHARMACEUTICAL PLANTS v Doors .i7 Hallways Milking parlors 0 Wainscots Washrooms Gestation/Farrowing areas FACTORIES -f Wear panels Shower stalls Processing rooms ( Clean rooms Coolers/Freezers ANIMAL CONFINEMENT BUILDINGS . . MEAT/FOOD PROCESSING PLANTS *The 1976 NFPA Fir. Protection Handbook C reveals that more than 62% of all deaths in building fires are caused by asphyxiation by smoke and gases. NOBODY : � WANTSAFIREIIIII Nobody plans a fire. But, fires do happen. And, when they happen, want to see the exit signs. Protection Association fires. Your building needs you want as much time as You don't want your res- states that asphyxiation walls and ceilings that possible to get people out y by smoke and gases ac- K rr counts for more than 62% ` ;Pw60":`&peration hampered r14 O 0. k'!,y, +' •. of the buildingwith as lit- b large volumes of g,,. "x' will not roduce a large Y 9 1 P 9 tle hazard as possible.You smoke. The National Fire ofalh`deathsln"bbilding volume of smoke. LOW SMOKE FIRE-X GLASBORD,PANELING GIVES YOU THAT EXTRA MARGIN OF FIRE SAFETY, It's the safest frp building material—ideal for use in fast food chains and restaurants. _ 0\7 �j'jjyylyyt I�y(aj.fj]1(��y'� �� + .A aS(�i�.{z�5i�� YS.p•s,}��'R I-t•`'H .��~ T 5 J "ter"1_�-t„��5.�('�f�4~��}.s t �� +fl �~ b�}l.. ACi �sN 1 "� 1 t- 4 y 1. irn 6"izJ t„rvr S ;n• i .�j x S tC +dry � �r " .> dn'a�-1< >r t 1*jt �ii tf t rf ''1 ` � l � dS1 �' m ..: i z $Y �' £^ 'X>Lv �� p r��F� �1��I � � xr. �fti.tji, n” .„c,. ,,,vni ,t f n 8 �i ^"'• f f tf + ctual size photograph of mbossed surface ti J:::0 s Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord flame spread 50, fuel contri- lengths to install one-piece, Use low smoke Fire-X Glas- panel is a fiberglass reinforced buted 5, smoke developed 75., floor-to-ceiling on your walls, bord paneling as a wall and plastic (frp) material —tough, Laboratory tests show the or as a one-piece wainscot the ceiling panel en— durable,easy to clean. Its em- smoke that does develop is length of your hallway or cor- bossed, pebble-like surface is light gray with a low level of ridor. It's easy to install, re- ■ kitchens scratch and abrasion resistant. irritation and only traces of quires minimal maintenance. It resists stain. . .does not re- carbon monoxide. Wherever you want a clean- • food preparation areas tain odors. . .is accepted by Available in a variety of able,durable wall surfacewith • walk-in coolers and freezers the USDA. And, low smoke thicknesses, low smoke Fire-X an extra margin of fire safety, ■ storage areas Fire-X Glasbord has now been Glasbord panel comes in stan. low smoke Fire-X Glasbord ■ washrooms classified by UL with a class B dard building panel sizes, in panel is your answer. ■ customer service areas Get the full story today. KEMLITE CORPORATION P.O..Box 429, Joliet, Illinois 60434 Glasbord Reg. U.S.Pat.Off. ©1978 Kemlite Corporation NOTICE: Like other organic building materials le.g.wood),panelsmadeof fiberglass reinforced plastic resins are combustible and should beused incompliance with local building codes and insurance regulations. Forrn No 812 Printed in U.S.A. ALTERNATE WALL FINISH MarliteBrand FRP . . . @ KITCHEN Sanitary Walls Can Still Be Beautiful. 4 a'^ a�'`"Y x•"4+"f.Fu��3<,'�"+ R,� * �„a.WrY^"F.r�L�� .d a, 4 i ':i � i �.. a� 141,h-C�� fiyy�iil•� `4`'tii i?irt,.h 7}£T �}��-ki rr7i e i r n'�e F'''�ry `k .r�� i 'klri9.7f ,*+d �vhX9 �.°£ .. t tl if f i 5 s t t I j �. 11 4 l 5 d&r13t� 4 1'23 x,1) .4 �� ie Sl li lLt �.r)�lA You can create walls and ceilings pleasing to the eye while still meeting rigid sani- Cation,maintenance and durability require- - ments.Marlite Brandy FRP(Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester)Is a tough chemicalte :. and water resistant surface with an attractively embossed design.Harmonizing ,` -t,,;fit' ( i. -- moldings,part of an entire FRP system,help 1v, , v; present a clean appearance without grout or Money-savingtiib 4` score lines. Maintenance Whether you steam-clean,hose 4 Nft - A Washable, Steam- down or simply wipe clean, ? maintenance is fast and easy. ' Cleanable System Marlite Brand FRP resists Marlite Brand FRP is USDA approved to rotting,staining,denting,splin- meet government standards and require- tering and corrosion.There are ments for steam cleanability and sanitation. no grout or mortar lines to The hard,non-porous surface will not attract dirt. absorb stains,support mold or retain odor. 1 { Moldings and sealant prevent moisture from I r� _ t �. I seeping behind panels. Four Attractive Colors To Accent x Time-saving Installation Or Harmonize 1i' No specialized labor is required.For wall Marlite Brand FRP installation,simply establish center line, - allows you to keep spread adhesive,apply panels and moldings pace with modern Marlite Brand FRP with sealant.For ceilings,install grid design trends.Four Keeps Showing Up In system and put pre-cut drop in panels in standard colors;white, place.The only tools required are a saw, natural almond,antique caulking gun,drill,tile,hammer and plumb The Cleanest Places y.,�: .•~!.. gold and beige;are line or level. available to create Wherever sanitation is a factor you'll find -+ Marlite Brand FRP.Animal confinement attractive working buildings.Canneries.Cheese plants.Clean environments.Special colors,sizes and thick- rooms.Cold storage warehouses.Conveni. Three Standard Sizes ence stores.Dairies and dairy stores.Fish. nesses are available in eries.Food preparation or processing areas. Standard sizes are 4'x 8'(20 lbs.),4'x 9'(23 quantity orders. Freezer warehouses.Frozen food plants. lbs.)and 4'x 10'(25 lbs.).A particularly high Standard Colors Kitchens.Laboratories.Locker rooms. strength-to-weight ratio makes the panels (Top to bottom) Lunch rooms.Meat plants.Milk houses and durable.A low coefficient of expansion ; White barns.Shipping areas.Restaurant kitchens. assures flatness(approximately 1116"on 4' :;+ v Beige Restrooms and shower stalls.Slaughter with 100°F temperature change). r _.` Natural Almond houses.Supermarkets.Walk-in coolers. r Washrooms. Antique Gold Specifications Marlite°Brand Marlite Brand FRP Panels: Call The Shall be 4'x 8;9'or 10'x 3132"Marlite Brand Class "A/I" Fire Rated Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester panels with Commercial Division FRP Panels 8'or 10'harmonizing moldings,Marlite Regional Operations Brand adhesive and sealant as supplied by g Now you can meet highly-restrictive fire the Commercial Division,Masonite Center Nearest To You. codes with decorative Class All low Corporation,Dover,Ohio.Materials must be flame/low smoke panels.Also USDA applied strictly in accordance with printed Part of our extensive commitment to the approved,the panels maintain all of the installation instructions provided. Commercial marketplace is our five durability,cleanability and easy main- Marlite Brand Class"Ali"Fire-Rated Regional Operations Centers throughout tenanceualities of the standard FRP the country.Each is available for sales q FRP Panels: panels.Available in P100FR,white only,and Shall be 4'x 8;9'or 10'x 3/32"Fiberglass assistance and to better help coordinate four standard sizes,2'x 4'x 3132"(8 lbs.),4'x Reinforced Polyester panels. production and shipments after the sale. 8'x 3/32"(21 lbs.),4'x 9'x 3132"(23 lbs.)and FRP Panels shall be installed with 8'or 10' REGIONALISALES - 4'x10'x3/32"(26 lbs.).Other sizes and harmonizing moldings,adhesive and DISTRIBUTION CENTERS colors are available on special order. sealant as supplied by the Commercial HEADQUARTERS: Division,Masonite Corporation,Dover,Ohio. ;-202 Harger,P.O.Box 250 - Material must be applied strictly in Dover,Ohio 44622 accordance with the printed installation 2161343-6621 instructions provided. ' Marlite Brand FRP Drop-In SOUTHEAST: Ceiling System: 1721 Marietta Blvd.N.W. Shall be 2'x 4'(nominal)x 3/32"Marlite Atlanta,Georgia 30318 Brand Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester 40413551980 _ panels as supplied by the Commercial MIDWEST: Division,Masonite Corporation,Dover, 202 Harger,P.O.Box 250 Ohio. Dover,Ohio 44622 The information herein is to assist cus 2161343-6621 lomers in determining whether our EAST: products are suitable for their applica- 80 Newfield Avenue,Raritan Center tions.We request that customers inspect Edison,New Jersey 08617 and test our products before use and 201/225-1650 satisfy themselves as to contents and SOUTHWEST: suitability.Nothing herein shall con- 4601 Pylon St. stitute a warranty,express or implied, Fort Worth,Texas 76106 including any warranty of merchandisa- 8171625-6443 bility or fitness,nor is protection from WEST: any law or patent inferred.All patent 16024 Phoebe Avenue, rights are reserved. LaMirada(Los Angeles),California 90638 714/5232500 or 213/944-0157 Marlite and xorelock are registered trademarks of Masonite Coreoraron . COMMERCIAL DIVISION MASONIIE UOVE11,0111044622 141613436621 FR2-01832 Printed In U.S.A. lKi0i • 1 g o --- 1 C/ i SOIL AND FOUNDATION STUDY PROPOSED PIZZA HUT RESTAURANT 105 CANAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared For: JOHN R. PAULUS, DIVISION FACILITY DIRECTOR FOR PIZZA HUT, INC. Prepared By: EMPIRE SOILS INVESTIGATIONS, INC. LATHAM, NEW YORK l FILE NO. : ATA-88-284 JANUARY 1989 1� J 585 T ROY-SCH EN ECTADY ROAD, (RT. 7), LATHAM, NY 12110, 518-783.1555 1 ;�W�a ffi SOIL AND FOUNDATION STUDY PROPOSED PIZZA HUT RESTAURANT I 105 CANAL STREET 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS I I. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a soil and foundation study of a site proposed for the construction of a Pizza Hut Restaurant in Salem, Massachusetts. The study has included an investigation of the site's 1 subsurface conditions and, from our interpretation and analysis of these I conditions, the development of recommendations for the design and con- struction of foundations, floor slabs and asphalt pavements. The recom- mendations have been developed on our understanding that the building will be a one-story brick and wood frame structure that is conventionally Isupported by continuous wall foundations. No isolated column footings for interior wall or equipment support will be required nor is a basement planned. The average perimeter wall loading is estimated to equal about J1,000 pounds per lineal foot. This report has been prepared at the request and written authoriza- tion of Mr. John R. Paulus, Division Facility Director for Pizza Hut, Inc. It was conducted according to the scope defined by a letter of au- thorization dated December 9, 1988 and the attached "Checklist for Pizza Hut Subsurface Investigation". 585 TRaOY-SCHENECTADY ROAD, (RT. 7), P.O. BOX 280, LATHAM, NY 12110, 518-783-1555, FAX 518.783.1323 y Page 2 1 II. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION 1 The site's subsurface conditions were investigated on December 21, 1988 and again on January 17, 1989. The initial investigation involved the advancement of five (5) test borings at the locations and to the depths specified by Pizza Hut, Inc. Test borings B-1, B-2 and B-3 were advanced near three (3) corners of the proposed building site and pen- etrated to depths of 16.4 to 17.0 feet. The remaining two (2) test bor- ings, B-4 and B-5, were advanced in areas proposed for parking and pen- etrated to depths of 8 and 10 feet, respectively. Their locations , as established through tape measurement from adjacent buildings and chain link fences, are shown on the Subsurface Investigation Plan contained in Appendix A. Two locations were explored to greater depths as part of the supple- Imentary site investigation. These borings, identified as B-2A and B-3A 1 on the plan, penetrated to depths of 19.0 and 51.5 feet, respectively. Two (2) truck-mounted drill rigs were used to advance the test bor- ings. They were equipped with hollow stem augers to case the boreholes against collapse , and to facilitate soil sampling and penetration testing as they were advanced with depth. The soil samples were obtained and penetration tests performed by the Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils, ASTM Designation D-1586. In those test borings advanced in the initial site investigation, sampling and penetration testing was performed on a continuous or near continuous ba- sis to depths of 8 to 12 feet. Thereafter, and below a depth of 20 feet in test boring B-3A, it was performed at nominal five (5) foot intervals. Representative portions of the recovered samples were placed in jars J Page 3 and transported to our office for visual classification by a Geotechnical 1 Engineer. On the basis of these classifications and the driller-s field records, individual Subsurface Logs were prepared. The logs are pre- sented in Appendix B and, as requested, include on them next to the soil classification the corresponding Group Symbol of the Unified Soil Clas- sification System. A sheet entitled "General Information and Key to Sub- surface Logs" follows the logs and has been included to help explain the. terms and symbols used in their preparation. Several of the samples recovered from the test borings were tested in our laboratory to determine their moisture content. The test results lare tabulated on the sheet contained in Appendix C. 1 III. SITE DESCRIPTION A. Location & Surface Features The project site is located in Salem, Massachusetts along the east side of Canal Street approximately 100 feet south of its intersection with St. Paul Street. It is presently occupied by a small one (1) story wood framed structure with an attached concrete block garage. This structure is located close to Canal Street, and is used as the office and garage of a used car dealership. Asphalt pavement is present along Canal Street in front of the structure while that portion of the site used as ithe car lot is gravel surfaced. A storm sewer easement bisects the site and separates the front por- tion used by the car dealership from its back half. This portionis oc- cupied by several trailers used by the present land owner for storage of materials needed for his glass company housed in the two (2) buildings 111 Page 4 bordering the south property line. Half of this area is gravel surfaced while the other half is wooded. The site grades vary some 18 inches from elevation 13.5 to 15.0 feet across the gravel surfaced areas. The wooded portion of the site rises in grade in a north-northeast direction to elevation 19.0 feet, plus or minus. B. Subsurface Conditions Each test boring first encountered fill consisting of a varying mix- ture of silt, sand, gravel and foreign matter such as brick, coal, ash and glass. It extended to depths of 4 to 8 feet and was underlain by or- ganic silt and clay embedded with lesser amounts of sand and gravel. These soils extended to depths of 12 to 17 feet. Their standard penetra- tion resistance was as low as one (1) indicating they are soft and of high compressibility. Sand of a firm relative density was encountered below the organic soils and, at the location of test boring B-3A, found to extend to a depth of 51.5 feet. Its texture varied from fine to being well graded from fine to coarse. Within its upper few feet, cobbles may be embedded within the sand as two (2) borings, B-1 and B-2A, apparently met refusal Jon the same. C. Groundwater Each test boring penetrated the groundwater table as noted by the JJJ recovery of wet, saturated soil samples and, in test borings B-2A and B-3A, by its entry into the auger casing. The levels rose to between depths of 6 and 10 feet, or about where the soil samples first became wet. On the basis of these observations, the groundwater table appears y Page 5 to be present at a depth of about six (6) feet below the existing site 1 grades. IV. SITE EVALUATION & GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT The project site's subsurface conditions are not favorable for its economical development. An average of six (6) feet of uncontrolled fill 1111 is present and overlies some 10 feet of soft , highly compressible organic S7 soils. As these soils extend well below the groundwater table and are underlain by a deep deposit of sand, their excavation and replacement by well compacted imported granular soils becomes both time consuming and icostly due to: 1 1. The large volume of excavation and replacement, 2. The uncertainty as to whether the fill soils must be disposed in a se- cure landfill, and I3. That an elaborate dewatering system would be required to accomplish the excavation. 1 In our opinion, the most economical and efficient means of supporting the structure is by piles. Although well suited for this site's subsurface conditions, Franki Piles, cast in—place concrete piles with a pressure—injected base formed at a depth of 25 feet below the existing site grades are not recommended for use. These piles, with their large 1 ground displacement and the pounding involved in their installation, would transmit significant ground vibrations to adjacent structures and the buried storm sewer and possibly cause damage to the same. Accord- ingly, a more conventional pile with a lesser volume of ground displace- ment is recommended for use at this site. Either timber piles or auger cast piles may be used and should prove to be the most cost effective. Each, however, suffers from specific advantages and disadvantages, the Page 6 most important of which are summarized on the following page. 1 i� TIMBER PILES 1 Advantages Disadvantages o Low Installed Cost, estimated o Poor tolerance to hard driving to equal 12 to 13 dollars per particularly in areas where foot. cobbles were encountered. May require replacement piles. o Readily Available o Transmits ground vibrations during driving. o May be competitively bid as standard equipment may be used for driving. AUGER CAST PILES Advantages Disadvantages o May penetrate minor obstacles o High cost estimated at 20 dollars per foot. o Low ground displacement , o Concern for necking of pile eliminating concerns of trans— within soft organic soils. mitting excessive vibrations Requires upper 15 feet to be to adjacent structures. sleeved at an additional cost of 20 dollars per foot. o Greater Load capacity o Requires specialty contractor. Regardless of which piles are chosen for use at this site it should be understood that they must be used to support both the structure's frame and floor slab. Structural support of the floor slab is required Jas the organic soils at this site are very compressible and will not only compress under loads imposed by any grade increases and equipment the floor supports but may also be continuing to compress under the weight of the fill which overlies it due to its long term (secondary) compression characteristics. Utilities normally installed below the slab should ac— Page 7 cordingly be "hung" from the slab or be installed within an earth fill that is placed over the structural slab and covered with a conventional slab-on-grade. Grade increases about the site should be minimized or; if possible, avoided so as to minimize the settlement, particularly the abrupt differential settlement of the utilities at their point of connec- tion to the building. Flexible connections, or pipe sleeves with com- pressible material packed between the inside pipe and the sleeve, should be used to help accommodate the differential settlement. The following sections present our recommendations for site prepara- tion, pile design and installation, and asphalt pavements. Recommenda- tions are provided for both timber piles and auger cast piles. Auger 1 cast piles, with special care taken in their installation, are preferable Iin that they do not pose a threat to the structural integrity of adjacent structures. They are , however, nearly twice the cost of timber piles. The difference in the costs between using timber piles or auger cast piles should be weighed against the risks involved and whether the owner of the adjacent buildings is willing to share these risks as his gain is the sale of the project site. Should the use of timber piles be ap- proved, all surrounding structures should be inspected and a photographic record of any noticeable structural defects made so as to document them and thereby avoid unjustified claims. In addition, seismic monitoring should be performed to determine the magnitude of the vibrations trans- mitted to all adjacent structures, those to the south as well as in other directions. J 1 . 1 Page 8 V. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Site Preparation 6 Earthwork Site preparation should begin with the removal of asphalt pavement where it exists; clearing and grubbing of trees, and the stripping of any 1 vegetation, topsoil or other surficial organic matter. The existing buildings should be demolished and their floor slabs and foundations re- moved in their entirety. Selected Fill consisting of sand or sand and gravel conforming to the following limits of gradation should be used to backfill areas of foundation removal. Selected Fill Sieve Size Percent Finer by Weight 4 inch 100 No. 40 20 to 80 No. 200 0 to 15 The backfill should be placed in maximum loose lift thicknesses of eight (8) inches and each lift be compacted to a dry density of at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density as defined by the Standard Proctor Compaction Test, ASTM Designation D-698. Grade increases about the site should be kept to an absolute minimum as previously recommended. Material used for grade increases should con- sist of Selected Fill, placed and compacted as recommended above. Prior to its placement, however, the entire subgrade should be proofrolled us- ing a smooth drum vibratory roller having a static weight of at least ten (10) tons. The roller should complete at least three (3) passes across J the subgrade in each direction, north-south and east-west. Any area I which "weaves" or "pumps" under the passing roller should be undercut and Page 9 stabilized through backfilling the area with well compacted Selected Fill. B. Timber Piles Pressure—creosoted timber piles extending 55 feet below grade are recommended for this site. The piles should have a minimum circumfer— ence, measured three (3) feet from the butt, of 44 inches and should con— form to the requirements of ASTM Designation D-25 (latest edition) , "Specifications for Round Timber Piles". Their creosote treatment should conform with AWPA C-3, "Foundation Piles—Preservative Treatment by Pres— sure Processes." EEE The piles should be driven with a hammer capable of achieving the design penetration without exceeding a driving stress of 3,000 pounds per Isquare inch. Steel boots should be attached to their tip to help protect them during driving through obstructions. Strapping, although not con— tsidered necessary at this site, may be performed if conditions warrant. 1 A pile driving analyzer (PDA) should be used over a period of two (2) days to monitor several piles for their driving stress and integrity, hammer performance, and to verify that the estimated allowable pile load capacity of 25 tons is achieved. The results of this testing will also help establish final driving criteria; i.e. the minimum allowable pile penetration and final driving resistance for the hammer chosen for use. We note, however, that the estimated pile capacity of 25 tons has been reduced by 3 tons to account for the loads caused by downdrag (or negative skin friction) developed as the organic soils consolidate and settle around the piles. 1 — Page 10 ! I C. Auger Cast Piles �I Auger cast piles of a 14 inch diameter are recommended in lieu of timber piles. These piles, however, must be cast within their upper 15 I feet through a steel sleeve to protect the piles from necking along where they are surrounded by the soft organic soils. The piles may be in- stalled to depths ranging from 50 to 60 feet below existing grades. The length may be chosen depending upon the desired design loads listed be- low. These loads, as for timber piles, have been reduced to account for those loads induced by negative skin friction. Pile Length Allowable Pile Capacity 50' 27 tons 55' 30 tons 60' 33 tons Settlement of these piles (or the timber piles) should not exceed one-half (1/2) of an inch. D. Pavement lJ Final preparation for pavement construction should include regrading of the subgrade to remove ruts and final adjustment of the grades to pro- vide for the differing depths of pavement structure between parking areas and entrance drives. The subgrade should be compacted using several passes (three or more) of a smooth drum roller with a static weight of ten (10) tons. Any unstable areas disclosed by the proofrolling should be undercut and backfilled with Selected Fill to the depth required to stabilize the areas. The pavement section should have a base course of clean, well- graded processed sand and gravel or crusher-run stone having no more than ten (10) percent, by weight, of particles passing the 200 mesh sieve. The r Page 11 F f 1- base course should be twelve (12) inches in depth along entranceways and areas carrying delivery truck traffic, and eight (8) inches in depth in 1111 areas of vehicle parking. The top of the pavement section should include 4 an asphaltic binder and wearing course, two (2) and one (1) inches thick, respectively. The composition of each course should comply with the Massachusett's State Department of Transportation's Specifications for dense asphalt concrete of low permeability. VI. CLOSURE This report has been prepared to aid Pizza Hut, Inc. in the site de- velopment , and design and construction of earthwork, pile foundations and pavements for the Pizza Hut Restaurant proposed for construction along Canal Street in Salem, Massachusetts. The recommendations have been pre- sented on the basis of our understanding of the project site and proposed development, and through the application of generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties, expressed or im- plied, are made. Important information concerning your interpretation and use of this report is presented in Appendix D. L L i . Page 12 Finally, to ascertain that the conditions encountered by test boring B-3A extend beneath the entire building site at least ten (10) feet be- yond the depth the piles will be driven to, two (2) additional test borings should be advanced and included as part of the contract 7 documents. Sincerely, EMPIRE SOILS INVESTIGATIONS, INC. Richard C. Wakeman, P.E. Project En ineer Fred A. Dente, P.E. Vice President RCW:rd Att. 1 �1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PLAN i� y t Y ffi t r 4 9W'f t n d a� I �y � FM et�n � y id AA 13 t; APPENDIX A � id/ 191 z b n� - B' ... ,,},, ar Lu»r_ ° • .. esr a-4aZ —77eEE7— N Ir I r ' G cea �.fF rRuienNT y \ SA6�xSr;$L I true I f uas'i II I SUBSURFACE _j INVESTIGATION PLAN rPROfb5E0 V/ZZA H(/T REST-9UQ4NT 44JV4L SrREET (� .S4LEM, W4.i5,4GNUSpTS i DR.BV P SC.L. / •30' 1'ROI 'o4 -BO-"4 •daas•w.ag /vim ao eY wc�PG {hrrw uvT. cx03, 1 DnTL 2/69 1 Mx G'o / SUBSURFACE LOGS AND KEY x f x4 a f s "N'+ems e air ♦b 7i � as n t 3,:.T ,° d j F �.• y 4 f yy.'.} �yx�.�� yt � !+- eat w �,✓k ° L^f y o f r t tet Y Sf T y �a �4'$�."'SR°3,k#� ,,.fyt"�4 7 •.de `bu a-�reE r ;.'� * �� _.. � q e a i APPENDIX B . 'fF�y f ♦ yT f t t'a ,�.ad3"... 'Y tss v l DATE- STARTED 12/21/88 HOLE NO. B-1 FINISHED 12/21/88 ' SUBSURFACE LOG SURF. ELEV. *14.7' 1 SHEET 1 OF 1 C.w. DEPTH See Note Ill PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem. Massachusetts stows ON s�mvten 3 i SOIL OR ROCK NOTES i o a u o CLASSIFICATION ,: ,a " m 0. 1 ' Asphalt 1 25 15 1 121 FILL MATERIAL-ASH, BRICK, SAND AND Note Ill: 6j 41 1 GRAVEL No Groundwater inside 2 100 .2 casing at completion of drilling � -becomes wet 5 3 5 4 7 *Approximate eleva- 3 2 (Dry to Wet-Firm to Loose) _ tion based on "Boun- 4 1 3 6 Brown & B1aCk organic sl.lt, Some San dary and Topographic and embedded ravel lOL) 3 2 Wet-Loose Survey for Pizza Hut" - 5 3 2 3 Black SAND and GRAVEL, Some Silt with Map prepared by 10 1 1 Ash (Wet-Loose) Hoffman Engineers an 6 1 1 2 Black SILT and CLAY, Some Sand and Surveyors, Dated 1 1 Organics (OH) 12/2/88 1 (Wet-Very Loose(Soft)) 1 7 15 30 - Brown SAND and fine GRAVEL —100 (.4 (Wet-Compact) END OF BORING @ 16.4' . -20- N = Noblows to drive 2 " spoon 12 "with 140 Ib. pin wt. falling 30 "per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by C = No blow, to drive " casing "with Ib.weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OF INVESTIGATION. 4}" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Casing. R/T Form H DATE � STARTED _ _ 12/21/8$ HOLE NO. B-2 FINISHED 12/21/88 • • ' SUBSURFACE LOG SURF. ELEV. *14. 1 ' SHEET 1 OF 1 - G. W. DEPTH See Note #1 1 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts J c stows oR sA-,,ER 3 = SOIL OR ROCK NOTES CLASSIFICATION ° 6 B " m K0. 1' Asphalt 0 " 1 14123 35 FILL MATERIAL-Black SILT and fine Note #1: 12110 SAND, Some fine Gravel, trace organ- ics No groundwater inside 2 10 5 7 -Some Coal and Ash augers at completion 2 1 Dry o Wet_Com�ct to Loose) _ _ of drilling 5 3 1 1 2 Brown/Black Highly organic SILT, Som Note #2: 1 1 Sand, trace Clay (OL) WH denotes that spoon 4 2 1 2 -and SAND, trace gravel penetrated 6 under 1 WH (Wet-Loose) static weight of hammer. 5 1 WH - Gray/Black Organic SILT, trace clay *Approximate eleva- 0 1 (OL) tion based on "Boun- -Some Clay, trace shells (OH) dary and topographic 1 2 survey for Pizza Hut" map prepared by Hoffman Engineers and (Wet-Loose) Surveyors, dated 1 12/2/88. 7 3 4 11 Gray Black SILT and fine sand, little 7 9 clay, trace organics (shell ) (SM) ( et-Firm) END OF BORING @ 17.0' . f 20— N = Noblows to drive 2 " spoon 12 _with 140 Ibpin wt. falling 30"per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by C = No blow, to drive ` casing "with Ib.weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OF INVESTIGATION 4V I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Casing. R/T farm H DATE - STARTED 1/17/89EMTYF HOLE NO. B-2A FINISHED 1/17/89 • SUBSURFACE LOG SURF. ELEV. 14.0' SHEET 1 OF 1 G. W. DEPTH See Note #1 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts _ _ O BLOWS ON z . SN/dPLER � SOIL OR ROCK NOTES f o e o CLASSIFICATION N N ¢ V 0 6 0 Note d11: At comple- Augered to 18.7' . tion of drilling with augers advanced to 18.7' groundwater level at 6.2' inside S augers. f _10- 15- 1 11 00 0.3' Gray fine to coarse SAND SW 0 (Wet-Compact) END OF BORING @ 19.0' . - J N = No blows to drive 2 " spoon 12 "with 140 Ib. pin wt. falling 30 "per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by C = No blow, to drive—' casing—"with Ib. weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: 31" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Casing.- R/T Form H DATE• STARTED 12/21/88 HOLE NO. B-3 1 FINISHED 12/21/88 ' " w ' SUBSURFACE LOG SURF.' URF ELEV. *13.21 G.W. DEPTH See Note III SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts = O BIOwS ON a F $BMPIER 3SOIL OR ROCK NOTES < E o e o CLASSIFICATION < N m < 0— Vh 0 1 1 171501 - FILL MATERIAL-Gray/Black SAND, Some Note II1 : 1100/.21 Silt, little Gravel (Moist) Groundwater noted at 2 4 2 7 13.5' with auger cas- 5 3 - ing in place at 15' . Note #2:5 3 1 WH -No sample recovery WH Denotes that spo WH WH -becomes Brown/Black SAND & GRAVEL, penetrated 6" under 7 4 3 1 11 lSome Wood Chips, glass and Shells static weight of y� 10 6 Wet-Loose to Firm hammer. 5 4 2 4 Black SILT and fine SAND, some or- *Approximate eleva- O 2 2 1 ganics, trace shells (SM) tion based on "Boun- 6 3 5 10 Black SILT, fine SAND, GRAVEL and dary and Topographic 5 5 SHELLS (SM/GM) Survey for Pizza Hut (Moist to Wet-Firm to Loose) Map prepared by Hoff- -driller notes change to hard auger man Engineers and Surveyors, dated 1 12/2/88. 7 7 10 20 becomes Tan CLAY, trace sand (CL) 10 12 1 I (Moist-Stiff) END OF BORING @ 17.01 . 0 l 1 l l N = Noblows to drive 2 " spoon 12 "with 140 Ib. pin wt. falling 30 "per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by C = No blow, to drive-' casing " with Ib.weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OF INVESTIGATION 4V I D Hollow Stem Auger Casing RR Form H JFDAT E ' STARTED 1/17/89 1EM1� HOLE NO. B-3A 1 FINISHED 1/17/89 ® ' SUBSURFACE LOG SURF ELEV. 13. 1' SHEET 1 OF 2 C. W. DEPTH See Note 111 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts — J BLOWS ON z i SOIL OR ROCK NOTES CLASSIFICATION O t N 0 6 12 \B f{� Augered to 17.0' . Note 911: At comple- tion of drilling with augers advanced to 49.5' groundwater level at 9.75' in- 5 side augers. 0- 15- 1 l1 15 25 48 Black SAND, SILT & WOOD, little 1 23 19 coarse gravel (Wet-Compact) t 19' 1 41 Brown fine to coarse SAND, little 0 2 16 19 35 gravel, trace silt (SW) _1 22 2 27 3 15 7 22 -becomes fine to medium SAND, trace l12 fine gravel . l 30 7 4 5 4 9 -Layer of fine SAND, trace silt (SP) 7 10 3 5 13 14 27 -grades fine to medium SAND. 12 O 17 2 p 12 140 pg "per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by N = No. blows to drive s oon i 'with Ib. n wt. fallin 30 C = No blow, to drivecasing "with Ib. weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OF INVESTIGATION 3P I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Casing. PIT Form H DATE ' STARTED 1/17/89 HOLE NO. B-3A 1 1/17/89 ' " • SUBSURFACE LOG SURF. ELEV. 13. 1 ' FINISHED SHEET 2 OF 2 G.W. DEPTH See Note #1 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts 1 _ f O BlUwS ON z Sn.uPLER 3 SOIL OR ROCK NOTES CLASSIFICATION 6 16 112 1 1 28 -becomes fine to medium SAND, trace 15 fine gravel 5 5 10 -becomes medium to coarse SAND, 7 14 14 28 little fine gravel (SW) 21 Wet-Firm) END OF BORING @ 51 .5. ' N = No. blows to drive 2 "" spoon 12 "with 140 Ib. pin wt. falling 30 "per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by C = No blow, to drive _ " casing—" with Ib.weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OF INVESTIGATION- 3V I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Casing. FIT Form H ATE`: STARTED 12/21/88 HOLE NO. B-4 FINISHED 12/21/88 ' ' SUBSURFACE LOG SURF. ELEV. *13.2 SHEET 1 - OF 1 G. W. DEPTH See Note 111 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts BLOW'ON 1nm11ea z .i SOIL OR ROCK NOTES CLASSIFICATION < N 0- 1 111120 1 130 FILL MATERIAL-BRICK fragments, and Note #1: 101 5 1 1 SAND, trace organics. No groundwater inside - 2 6114 1 120 -becomes Moist augers at completion 6 123 1 1 of drilling. 5 3 6112 1 17 (Dry to Moist-Firm) 5 3 Gray CLAY with sand laiminations (CL) 4 1 2 3 (Wet-Stiff) grades to Organic SILT & SAND, Some 1 3 el L Wet-Loose END OF BORING @ 8':0' * Approximate eleva- 0 tion based on "Boun- dary and Topographic Survey for Pizza Hut" Map prepared by Hoff- man Engineers and Surveyors, Dated 1 12,2(88. 1D J 1 1 N = No. blows to drive 2 " spoon 12 "with 140 Ib. pin wt. falling 30 'per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by C = No blow, to dnve " casing--with Ib.weight falling "per blow. Geotechnical Engineer METHOD OFINVESTICATION 4�" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Casing. R/T Form H DAiE . ., STARTED 12/21/88 HOLE NO. B-5 1 FINISHED 12/21/88 SUBSURFACE LOG SURF. ELEV *13.8' SHEET 1 OF 1 G.W. DEPTH See Note Ill 1 PROJECT Proposed Pizza Hut LOCATION Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts Z BlOW50N 6 < O 65AMPl'H 3 < SOIL OR ROCK NOTES N m < CLASSIFICATION O 6 0 1 123120 1 127 FILL MATERIAL-BRICK FRAGMENTS and Note #1: 71 1 SAND. No groundwater in- t 1141 9 1 115 side augers at 1 61 3 1 1 completion of drill- s 3 13 2 5 Black Organic SILT and Brick fragmen sing. 3 2 Some Sand 4 3 1 1 Ill 1 (Moist to Wet-Firm to Loose) 5 4 2 3 Black Highly Organic SIL=T OL� 1 (Wet-Loose) *Approximate eleva- END OF BORING @ 10.0' tion based on "Boun- dary and Topographic - Survey for Pizza Hut" Map prepared by Hoff- 1 man Engineers and Surveyors, dated 12/2/88. 0 l J N = No. blows to drive 2 " spoon 12 "with 140 Ib. pin wt. falling 30 "per blow. CLASSIFICATION Visual by 1 Geotechnical Engineer C = Ni. hloW. Io dove " casing "with Ib.weight falling—"per per blow. g METHOD OF INVESTIGATION 4P I D Hollow Stem Auger Casing. RrT Form H � DATEMICK 5-1-66 HOLE NO. B-175 STARTED 1, FINISHED 5-1-66 SUBSURFACE LOG SURF.ELEV. 325.6 SHEET 1 OF G.W.DEPTH See Note#1 1 Project LOCATION j W BLOWS ON Z o SAMPLER a, SOIL OR ROCK NOTES E o6 1z o a CLASSIFICATION 0 w 6 12 16- N m o ]( 1 2 2 3 5 10 NOTE#1 �l1 TO 3" 15 Brown SILT,some Sand,trace clay G.W.at 2.0' completion 50/.5' (Moist- Loose) G.W.at 2.2' 24 hrs. after completion Gray SHALE, medium hard weathered, Run#1,25 -5.0' thin bedded some fractures 95% Recovery 71— a 50% ROD l 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 6 10 TABLEI TABLEII TABLE111 Split Spoon Identification of soil type is made on basis of an The following terms are used in classifying Sample estimate of particle sizes, and in the case of fine soils consisting of mixtures of two or more grained soils also on basis of plasticity. soil types.The estimate is based on weight of total sample. Shelby Tube Soil Type Soil Particle Size Sample Boulder > 12" Term Percent of Total Sample _ Cobble 3"-12" "and" 35-50 Gravel-Coarse 3"-°/4" Coarse Grained "some" 20-35 Auger or Test - Fine °/4" -#4 (Granular) "little" 10-20 Pit Sample Sand -Coarse #4-#10 "trace" less than 10 -Medium #10-#40 (Whensamplinggravellysoilswithastand- - Fine #40-#200 and split spoon, the true percentage of Rock Core Silt-Non Plastic (Granular) gravel is often not recovered due to the Clay-Plastic (Cohesive) <#200 Fine Grained relatively small sampler diameter.) TABLE IV TABLE V The relative compactness or consistency is described in accord with the Varved - Horizontal uniform layers or following terms. seams of soil(s). Granular Soils Cohesive Soils Term Blows per Foot,N Term Blows per Foot,N Layer - Soil deposit more than 6"thick. Loose < 11 Very Soft < 3 Seam - Soil deposit less than 6"thick. Firm 11 -30 Soft 3-5 Parting - Soil deposit less than''"thick. Compact - 31 -50 Medium 6-15 Very Compact 7 51 Stiff - 16-25 Laminated - Irregular,horizontaland angled Hard >26 seams and partings of soil(s). (Large particles in the soils will often significantly influence the blows per foot recorded during the Penetration Test.) TABLE VI Rock Classification Terms Term Meaning Hardness Soft Scratched by fingernail Medium Hard Scratched easily by penknife Hard Scratched with difficulty by penknife Very Hard Cannot be scratched by penknife Weathering Very Weathered Judged from the relative amounts of disintegration Weathered iron staining, core recovery,clay seams,etc. Sound Bedding Laminated Natural breaks in (<1" ) Thin bedded Rock Layers (1" -4" ) Bedded (4" -12" ) Thick bedded (12" -36" ) 1 Massive (>36" ) J (Fracturing refers to natural breaks in the rock oriented at some angle to the rock layers.) GENERAL INFORMATION & KEY TO SUBSURFACE LOGS The Subsurface Logs attached to this report present the observations and mechanical data coIlected by the driIler at the site, supplemented by classification of the material removed from the borings as determined through visual identification bytechnicians in the laboratory.It iscautioned that the materials removed from the borings represent only a fraction of the total volume of the deposits at the site and may not necessarily be representative of the subsurface conditions between adjacent borings or between the sampled intervals. The data presented on the Subsurface Logs together with the recovered samples will provide a basis for evaluating the character of the subsurface conditions relative to the project. The evaluation must consider all the recorded details and their significance relative to each other.Often analyses of standard boring data indicate the need for additional testing or sampling procedures to more accurately evaluate the subsurface conditions.Any evaluation of the contents of this report and the recovered samples must be performed by Professionals.The information presented in the following defines some of the procedures and terms used on the Subsurface Logs to describe the conditions encountered. 1. The figures in the Depth column defines the scale of the Subsurface Log. --� 2. The sample column shows, graphically,the depth range from which a sample was recovered.See Table 1 for a - description of the symbols used to signify the various types of samples. 3. The Sample No. is used for identification on sample containers and/or Laboratory Test Reports. 4. Blowson Sampler—showsthe results of the"Penetration Test",recording the numberof blows required to drive a split spoon sampler into the soil.The number of blows required for each six inches of penetration is recorded. The first 6 inches of penetration is considered to be a seating drive.The numberof blows required for the second and third 6 inches of penetration is termed the penetration resistance,N.The outside diameter of the sampler,the hammer weight and the length of drop are noted at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. 5. Blows on Casing — shows the number of blows required to advance the casing a distance of 12 inches. The casing size, the hammer weight and the length of drop are noted at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. If the casing is advanced by means other than driving, the method of advancement will be indicated in the Notes column or under the Method of Investigation at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. 6. All recovered soil samplesare reviewed in the laboratory byan engineering technician,geologist orgeotechnical engineer, unless note otherwise.The visual descriptions are made on the basis of a combination of the driller's field descriptions and observations and the sample as received in the laboratory. The method of visual classification is based primarily on the Unified Soil Classification (ASTM D 2487-83)with regard to the particle size and plasticity. (See Table No. II) Additionally,the relative portion, by weight, of two or more soil types is described for granular soils in accordance with"Suggested Methods of Test for Identification of Soils"by D. M. Burmister, ASTM Special Technical Publication 479, June 1970. (See Table No. III) The description of the relative soil density or consistency is based upon the penetration records as defined on Table No. IV. The description of the soil moisture is based upon the relative wetness of the soil as recovered and is described as dry, moist,wet and saturated.Water introduced in the boring either naturally orduringdrilling may haveaffectedthe -- moisture condition of the recovered sample.Special terms are used as required to describe materials in greater detail;several such terms are listed in Table V.When sampling gravelly soils with a standard two inch diameter -� split spoon,the true percentage of gravel is often not recovered due to the relatively small sampler diameter.The presence of boulders and large gravel is sometimes,but not necessarily,detected by an evaluation of the casing and samplers blows or through the"action"of the drill rig as reported by the driller. 7. The description of the rock shown is based on the recovered rock core and the driller's observations.The terms frequently used in the description are included in Table VI. 8. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. Solid stratification lines are based on the driller's field observations. , 9. Miscellaneous observations and procedures noted by the driller are shown in this column,including water level observations. It is important to realize the reliability of the water level observations depends upon the soil type ;■ (water does not readily stabilize in a hole through fine grained soils), and that drill water used to advance the J boring may have influenced the observations.The ground water level typically will fluctuate seasonally.One or more perched or trapped water levels may exist in the ground seasonally. All the available readings should be evaluated.If definite conclusions cannot be made,it isoften prudent to examine theconditions morethoroughly through test pit excavations or water observation wells. - 10. The length of core run is defined as the length of penetration of the core barrel. Core recovery is the length of core recovered divided by the core run. The ROD (Rock Quality Designation) is the total pieces of NX core exceeding 4 inches in length divided by the core run.The size core barrel used is also noted. � Y TEST RESULTS u f¢r tk 4 i d;n t 4 J �,4 � �4a 4 I4 p e p APPENDIX C x � n f d 1 TABLE Cl SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT PROPOSED PIZZA HUT RESTAURANT 105 CANAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Test Boring No. Sample No. Sample Depth (ft.) Natural Moisture Content B-1 4 6-8 22.7% B-1 6 10-12 91.4% IB-2 3 4-6 52.5% 1 B-2 5 8-10 30.0% B-2 6 10-12 90.5% B-2 7 15-17 35.2% B-3 5 8-10 56.3% 1 B-3 6 10-12 21 .5% B-4 4 6-8 18.6% B-5 3 4-6 20.3% JB-6 5 8-10 55.2% J � I j 1 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT n G 5 � n e Z� � qf ; .` APPENDIX D 1r 1 IMPORTANT INFORMATION • ABOUTYOUR 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsurface MOST GEOTECHNICAL"FINDINGS" ARE conditions than any other factor.As troublesome as sub- PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES surface problems can be,their frequency and extent have been lessened considerably in recent years,thanks to the Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions Association of Soil and Foundation Engineers(ASFE). only at those points where samples are taken,when they When ASFE was founded in 1969,subsurface problems are taken.Data derived through sampling and subsequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by the geotechnical were frequently being resolved through lawsuits.In fact, engineer who then renders an opinion about overall sub- the situation had grown to such alarming proportions that surface conditions,their likely reaction to proposed con- consulting geotechnical engineers had the worst profes- struction activity,and appropriate foundation design. Even sional liability record of all design professionals. By 1980, under optimal circumstances actual conditions may differ ASFE-member consulting soil and foundation engineers had the best from those opined to exist,because no geotechnical en- professional liability record.This dramatic turn-about can be gineer,no matter how qualified,and no subsurface explo- attributed directly to client acceptance of problem-solving ration program,no matter how comprehensive,can reveal programs and materials developed by ASFE for its mem- what is hidden by earth,rock and time.For example,the bers'application.This acceptance was gained because clients actual interface between materials may be far more . perceived the ASFE approach to be in their own best interests. gradual or abrupt than the report indicates,and actual ` Disputes benefit only those who earn their living from conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predic- 1 others'disagreements tions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated,but steps can The following suggestions and observations are offered to be taken to help minimize their impact. For this reason, most help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays,cost-over- experienced owners retain their geotechnical consultant through the construction stage,to identify runs and other costly headaches that can occur during a by variances,conduct additional construction project. tests which may be needed,and to recommend solutions '` to problems encountered on site. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS CHANGE A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsurface Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique set of changing natural forces.Because a geotechnical engineer- project-specific factors.These typically include:the general ing report is based on conditions which existed at the time nature of the structure involved,its size and configuration; of subsurface exploration,construction decisions should not be the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; based on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have physical concomitants such as access roads,parking lots, been affected by time.Speak with the geotechnical consultant and underground utilities,and the level of additional risk to learn if additional tests are advisable before construc- which the client assumed by virtue of limitations imposed tion starts. upon the exploratory program.To help avoid costly prob- lems,consult the geotechnical engineer to determine how Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and J any factors which change subsequent to the date of his natural events such as floods,earthquakes or groundwater report may affect his recommendations. fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and, thus,the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical report. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates The geotechnical engineer should be kept apprised of any is • When the nature of the proposed structure is otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not used: such events,and should be consulted to determine if changed,for example,if an office building will be additional tests are necessary. erected instead of a parking garage,or if a refriger- ated warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrig- erated one; A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • when the size or configuration of the proposed REPORT IS SUBJECT TO structure is altered; MISINTERPRETATION • when the location or orientation of the proposed structure is modified; y,. ": Costly problems can occur when other design profession- * when there is a change of ownership,or als develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a • for application to an adjacent site. geotechnical engineering report.Tb help avoid these prob A geotechnical engineer cannot accept responsibility for problems which lems,the geotechnical engineer should be retained to work may develop if he is not consulted after factors considered in his report's with other appropriate design professionals to explain development have changed. relevant geotechnical findings and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to geotechnical READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES issues. CLOSELY l BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on SEPARATED FROM THE ENGINEERING judgement and opinion,it is far less exact than other REPORTdesign disciplines.This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical Final boring logs are developed by the geotechnical en- consultants.Tb help prevent this problem,geotechnical gineer based upon his interpretation of field logs(assem- engineers have developed model clauses for use in written - bled by site personnel)and laboratory evaluation of field transmittals.These are not exculpatory clauses designed to samples.Only final boring logs customarily are included in foist the geotechnical engineers liabilities onto someone geotechnical engineering reports.These logs should not under else.Rather,they are definitive clauses which identify any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or where the geotechnical engineers responsibilities begin other design drawings,because drafters may commit errors and end.Their use helps all parties involved recognize their or omissions in the transfer process.Although photo- individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. graphic reproduction eliminates this problem,it does Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors misin- geotechnical engineering report,and you are encouraged terpretating the logs during bid preparation.When this " to read them closely.Your geotechnical engineer will be occurs,delays,disputes and unanticipated costs are the pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. all-too-frequent result. To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpretation, OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical engineering REDUCE RISK report.Those who do not provide such access may proceed under the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to J responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information discuss other techniques which can be employed to miti- always insulates them from attendant liability.Providing gate risk.In addition,theAssoclation of Soil and Founda- the best available information to contractors helps prevent tion Engineers has developed a variety of materials which costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes may be beneficial.Contact ASFE for a complimentary copy which aggravate them to disproportionate scale. of its publications directory. J J 1 J _ Published by J . J ASSMATION OF SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERS 8811 Colesville Road/Suite 225 J Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301/565-2733 J Citp of harem, AlaggarbuOttg Public Propertp Di epartment "�Q g Nuilbing Department One ffialem oreen 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer June 22, 1989 Piaaa Hut Incorporated James F. Cooper 27 Dublin Road Peabody, MA. 01960 RE: 105 Canal Street Dear Mr. Cooper: The following issues must first be addressed prior to obtaining a building permit: 1. A demolition permit is needed for the existing structure 2. Approval from the Board of Health 3. All signs must be approved by the Planning Department 4. A copy of the soil report 5. Handicap sinks are needed in the bathrooms 6. The contractors name with the city and state license numbers 7. walkways must be extended to meet minimum five (5) foot clearances in front of the doorways. If I may be of further assistance, please contact me at this office. SiWerely, David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/jmh CHRIS DRUCAS ATTORNEY AT LAW ONE CHURCH STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 AREA CODE 508 745-0500 C, Cl) a < P r 88C-1785 cn n � n Mr . David J. Harris June 16 , 198 �—c Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem y One Salem Green N Salem, MA 01970 Sn RE: Pizza Hut Building Permit Dear Mr . Harris : It was nice to discuss the pending building permit with you . Please be advised that this letter is written to confirm my representation to you that I represent the owners of the property, Mr . and Mrs . Donald J . Michaud, who have entered into a Lease Agreement with Pizza Hut . I have enclosed , for your information, a copy of the waiver from D.E .Q.E . , and if I can be of any further assistance, do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest possible convenience . Very truly yours, §rRiSDrucas CD/rb Enclosure cc: Donald J. Michaud ltr31 GULF OF MAINE (l, EUTEMD MF 4G°,3MSEDUML , . RESEARCH CENTER INC. 204 Lafayette Street SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 DATE JOB NO. 11 /ATTENTION r6171 745-66^18/�� TO �y�r (/VC.4� RE O 7 lJ. WE ARE SENDING YOU ched ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION V 9 t ✓moi✓ (, ( , �b ✓Z!EL EJ 4V C THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submitcopies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS wiz zo i11-17- ios' COPY TO r SIGNED: roan Hat ®0c Qft sA 01,11_ If sllclosums an not as noted, kindly notify us at ones. DANIEL S.CREENRAUM Commissioner ��/ j G�C�CA`/ ., oAoOA May 10, 1989 RE: Approved Waiver Application Commercial Property 105-111 Canal Street Salem, MA DEQE Site N : 3-2280 Bill Betters Gulf of Maine Research 204 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Bill; Please find enclosed two original Waiver Application Dispositions . Both disposition must be signed by Mr . and Mrs . Michaud, only one should be returned to DEQE's Northeast Regional office . The other is for their records . As a reminder the remedial action must be completed within five years . Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely; Al Margaret A. Bastien Environmental Engineer '� � �i2Pi ZOcu�2/32QIvvZG[L'f',c2;Clf?� Q��/'vGG!z1G�Cf�G+!dP.�,�� e�iezklizzeizta�(�rezriivze�iz �1� e_"" oruzeeivi �/�eGu�yalla�iyz/-��a�cu2 - �,//FV/a��zeaaG��,iarL DANIEL S.CREENHALAI c»mm c>.,M,1,•, �ll/ealuuvz, �2ucdeC�G, O�d'07 ADDENDUM TO WAIVER APPLICATION DISPOSITION FORM NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE April 24 , 1989 Please note the following instructions and , conditions: ( 1 ) Sign and return one copy of the WAIVER APPLICATION DISPOSITION Form (Section VIII) to: DEQE Northeast Regional Office 5A Commonwealth Ave Woburn, MA 01801 Attn: Site Assmt Sect/ Waiver Unit Retain one copy of the form for your records . (2) It is the responsibility of the Waiver Recipient to promptly notify the Local Board of Health in the affected community (ies) of Waiver approval. Notice shall be provided in writing and be copied to this Office . Notification to the Board of Health shall include a copy of the Waiver Application Disposition Form. (3) Required reports and other document submittals to this ^ffice must cleerlp indicate the DEQE Case Number and contain the designation "Waiver Submittal" . (5 ) Contaminated soils from this site may not be transported to any other location within Massachusetts without specific approval from this Office . Unapproved, off-site disposition, including treatment, reuse , or disposal , may constitute a "release" of oil or hazardous materials and create a new "site" . Soils contaminated only with virgin petroleum fuels should be handled in accordance with DEQE ' s Interim Policy for the Management of Residuals under Chapter 21E From Spills/Releases of Virgin Petroleum Oils . Soils contaminated with other oils or hazardous materials require site-specific approval . (over) f 't Treatment or reuse options are preferred. In-state landfill disposal will only be considered if documentation is provided that all available and applicable treatment options are not feasible . Proposals to treat, dispose , or reuse contaminated soils outside of Massachusetts must conform to all applicable in-state and out-of-state regulatory requirements , but do not otherwise require approval from the Regional Office . The review and approval of soil disposition proposals by the Department is solely from the context of preventing releases of oil and hazardous materials in new locations , and is not to be construed as a review or approval of the Final Remedial Response Plan for the Waiver site under consideration. (5) This office will conduct detailed audits on selected Waiver sites , on both a random basis and as a result of our initial review of Waiver applications and report documents submitted (or not submitted) pursuant to the conditions specified in Section IV. C Any questions regarding this matter should be directed to the above-specified address. a SECTION VIII WAIVER APPLICATION DISPOSITION (For DEQE Use Only) 1 . Application Number : 89-3-2280-1 Date Application Received: 09/11/89 2. Applicant Name : Mr . and Mrs . Donald Michaud Address : 12 Savoy Road Salem MA 01970 City/Town State Zip 3. Site Name : Commercial Propery 9 . Site ID Number : 3-2280 5. Disposition Waiver Application Determination. (Check One ) ❑X Approved. Conditions of approval: ❑ Denied. Basis for denial : Application reviewed by: John J. Fitzerald. Section Chief. Site Assessment Signature : Date : T15aj o Acceptance of Waiver Applicant Disposition I understand and agree to any and all additional conditions specified above for an approved application. ( Signature of Applicant ) (Date ) To be completed by applicant for approved waiver applications . Sign and return this page to the Department for all approved waiver applications . RETURN one signed Disposition to: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL - S QUALITY ENGINEERING ATT: John J. Fitzerald 5A Commonwealth Ave . Woburn, MA 01801 17 C, C7 Z G -4 o a o p -- SECTION VIII WAIVER APPLICATION DISPOSITION sr*+ � V m (For DEQE Use Only) ?Yo 1 . Application Number : 89=3-2280-1 Date Application Recevedo�n04/11/89 2 . Applicant Name : Mr . and Mrs . Donald Michaud Address : 12 Savoy Road 1 Salem MA 01970 City/Town State Zip 3. Site Name : Commercial Propery 4 . Site ID Number : 3-2280 5. Disposition Waiver Application Determination. (Check One ) Approved. Conditions of approval : ❑ Denied. Basis for denial: Application reviewed by: John J . Fitzerald, Section Chief, Site Assessment Signature , 4 Date : 51N�9 Acceptance of Waiver Applicant Disposition I understand and agree to any and dditional nditions specified above for an approved application. c� (Signature of pli nt ) (Da-te1) May 15 , 1989 To be completed by applicant for approved waiver applications . Sign and return this page to the Department for all approved waiver applications . RETURN one signed Disposition to: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING ATT: John J . Fitzerald 5A Commonwealth Ave . Woburn, MA 01801 17 RAN FLAMMABILITY DATA FOR INTERIOR FINISHES QUICK REFERENCE FLAME SPREAD DATA FOR INTERIOR FINISHES CLASSIFICATIONS: CLASS I (OR A) FLAME SPREAD 0-25 CLASS II 90R BO FLAME SPREAD 26-75 CLASS III 90R CO FLAME SPREAD 76-200 CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FLAME SPREAD OF UNTREATED RED OAK = 100 0 INTERIOR WOOD TRIM: SPECIE FLAME SPREAD CLASS III RED OAD 100 DOUGLAS FIR 70-100 SOUTHERN PINE 130-195 CLASS II WESTERN RED CEDAR 70 WEST COAST HEMLOCK 60-75 IDAHO WHITE PINE 72 REDWOOD 70 NO UNTREATED COMMON SPECIES LISTED FOR CLASS I 0 GYPSUM BD. : 5/8" TYPE X FOR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES RULE OF THUMB: 1 LAYER EA. SIDE = 1 HR. RATING 2 LAYERS EA. SIDE = 2 HR. RATING ETC. (SEE SHEETS ON CLASSIFIED ASSEMBLIES) 0 RESILIENT BASE: A2ROCK 6CB-3 FLAME SPREAD: 75 OR LESS (CLASS II) CRF: 1.0 WATTS/CM2 OR MORE 0 CARPETING: (UNITS WITH A.T.U. ) CARRIAGE CARPET PH-1800 GREEN PLAID FLAME SPREAD: 50 SMOKE DENSITY: 65 FUEL CONTRIBUTED: 30 (CLASS "B" RATING) 0 F.R.P. PANELING: KEMLITE GLASBORD-P FLAME SPREAD: 200 OR LESS (CLASS III) SMOKE DEVELOPED: 450 OR LESS KEMLITE FIRE-X GLASBORD FLAME SPREAD: 20 OR LESS (CLASS III) SMOKE DEVELOPED: 200 OR LESS MARLITE FRP FLAME SPREAD: 190 (CLASS III) SMOKE DEVELOPED: 440 0 WOOD PANELING: (CARRY OUT UNITS ONLY) MARLITE GALLEY OAK FLAME SPREAD: 200 (CLASS III) SMOKE DEVELOPED: 350 MARLITE FIRETEST PLANK FLAME SPREAD: 5 CLASS I) SMOKE DEVELOPED: 0 J WOOD TRIM ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK INSTITUTE CHESTERFIELD HOUSE, SUITE A • 5055 called tunnel test in which the tested material is The significant point in the above is that the placed in a 25 foot long tunnel, and a 41/2 foot, 0-200 classification is obtainable in many un- gas flame applied at one end. Flame spread is a treated wood species. While untreated lumber is distance and time relationship with the perform- not officially "labeled" by the Underwriters' Lab- ance of Red Oak representing 100 and cement as- oratories, nor have all species been tested, suffi- bestos board 0. The test requirements of the five tient tests have been made to justify the inference basic codes for materials intended for interior finish that the permissible number of wood species rating or interior trim is of 10 minute duration. While it is below 200 flame spread is extensive. not pertinent to this study, the testing procedure The following table lists untreated wood species for the similar classifications of wood products in- that have been tested and give their respective tended for structural purposes, is the same, except flame spreads: that the test period is extended to 30 minutes, and _Species of Wood Flame Spread' the material should show no progressive burning yellow 105-110 , during this extended time. The variation in these BttBirchirchWestern 70 test times is important, since it results in consider- Cottonwood e 115 able leniency of wood usage for interior purposes Cypress 145-150 and also is pertinent for interpreting data con- tained in the "Underwriter Laboratories Building Fir, Douglas 70-100 Material Directory." (See note #4, page 4.) _ Gum, Red 140-155 Hemlock,West Coast 60-75 CLASSIFICATIONS OF INTERIOR WOODWORK tMaple, Hard 104 Since wood door restrictions are judged by dif- Oak, Red or White 100 ferent and commonly understood criteria, this tPlne, Eastern White 85 study will concern itself with interior woodwork ttPine, Idaho 72 only. Exterior woodwork is restricted under dif- "Pine, Western White 75 ferent sections of these codes and will not be dis- "Pine, Northern White 120-215 cussed in this paper. "Pine, Southern Yellow 130-195 These Codes segregate interior woodwork into "Pine, Ponderosa 105-230 two categories; namely, interior trim and interior Poplar 170-185 finish. Thus, definitions and distinctions are ex- Redwood 70 tremely important to the understanding and inter- Spruce, Western 100 pretation of the code restrictions. The definition Spruce, Northern 65 of the two categories are as follows: Walnut 130-140 a. INTERIOR TRIM — This term refers t0 wood t Supplement No. 2, National Building Code of Canada A.S.T.M. standard E84-68. trim used for baseboards, railings, chair rails, pic- tt HPMA Test 7/74 certified for class ^II" or "B" material ture and cornice mouldings, and door and window uses. trim, except that occurring around either fire door * Standard Test Method for Fire Hazard Classification of p 9 Building Materials of Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc. estab- or fire window assemblies. lishes a numerical scale based on a noncombustible (Asbes- In all of the "Model" codes, interior trim ma tos-cement board) as zero and a combustible (Red Oak Y flooring) as 100— Excerpted from Underwriters' Laboratories, have a flame spread classification of 0-200. The Card Data Service, Serial No. UL527—May, 1971, only variations to this are that the BOCA code re- Due to wide variations in the different species of the Pine family and local connotations of their popular names, exact stricts interior trim to a 0-75 rating in areas where identification of the types of Pine tested was not possible. interior finish is required to have a 0-25 flame The effect of differing climatic and soil conditions on the burning characteristics of given species have not been de- spread classification, and the BOCA code has an termined. additional qualification that the trim may not ex- *" 18 tests of Ponderosa Pine showed three had values over teed 10% of the aggregate wall and ceiling area 200 and the average of all tests is 154. or it then becomes interior finish as defined on While the above list does not include some in- page 3. terior species in common use, the existence of USG Interiors, Inc. Fil _ r�l B U L L E T 202 Harger Street Dover.OH 44622 rr z- MARLITE COMMUNICATION BULLETIN #7-88 July 11 . 1988 TO: ALL SALES PERSONNEL FROM: M. W. COOK SUBJECT: FIRE TEST DATA ON STANDARD PRODUCTS The following are fire ratings on our standard products. These products were tested according to ASTM-84 by an independent laboratory: FLAME SPREAD SMOKE CLASS 1 . Smooth Panel 1/4" 165 185 C 2. Textured Plank 155 330 C 3. Smooth Diamond ClassicTM 115 150 C Plank 4, Wood Veneer Plank No test results but all components are Class C 5. Marlite Tambour No test results but all components are Class C 6. WoodcrestTM 100 100 C 7. FiretestTM Plank 5 0 A 8. FiretestTM II 10 20 A 9. FiretestTM 1 5 15 A 10. -MarliteR Brand Class 20 200 A "A" FRP 11 . MarliteR Brand Class 195 360 C "C" FRP I am sure that in most cases this information will satisfy most of our customers. 'AIf hey ould need more tail information. we will be happy to supply it. 1 G ` M. W. COOK Product Manager UN SM �r F �+ r �.�1 �, z✓t r' ! 1. r ys /);' `/ Z� IM r %d�*�� rk ® I I��l. 1 APO ..1I 1 i v `ry uq� w 4 1 VX, / ✓r l�l"11 J t ' t� 9 1 ,�ey+ T �}�'(. ,tr(� rr�� ,�(i � 'r, b I t! ol • �0�" f !/y� +�="f R _i;r � v��/1� 7 n ., Ivij tr, Y ry4,7�fi 4 r ,� J ✓r „ � Z r T � / / i{/1�/� ,Jq .A/rj e � '° /,/ i'. ! ! T n !I % / } ^✓� ,/yJp 1 i.�VS A �I /7�,; X �,y, ,/r�/ '/ MZ D Y��- r 5i_i)/,jrry. . •% A'/i:! /(/ r Y ' y�'� - r z m Q7 A`t ,'r r�1 s Y �4/F,� ./fir �y✓�,_�z V r� J� n SPECIFICATIONS Mari Brand Total Wall Systems Each Marlite brand product represents a total wall system and includes everything required for fast,reliable installation. . .right down to complete installation instructions. Use of the total system,Marlite Brand Adhesives,etc.,is recommended to assure quality of the installation. - ...._ Ma~Brand Moldings C-551 Water-Borne Adhesive ' There are four different Marlite A highly water-resistant latex-based adhesive that conforms - ' Brand Harmonizing Moldings to all requirements of ASTM C557.Available in 29 oz. available for a finished,pro- 1 cartridge and 5 gallon can.Application temperature:not fessionally applied appearance. �, �I,' recommended below 60°F. Edge molding.Inside Corner Shelf Life:Minimum 18 mos. Open Time:20 minutes Molding.Division Molding.Outside Corner Mottling.All are � available in color coordinated vinyl-covered aluminum, Color.Cream depending upon tempera= ' woodgramed design.Easy to handle and install.The Consistency:Medium grade lure and humidity conditions perfect finishing touch. viscosity/buttery smooth paste Exposure:As low as -40°F. Coverage:See chart below Heat Resistance:Good to Universal Wood Molding: Weight Per Gallon:9.5 lbs. 140°F. - 'f:One solid oak molding strip can be used in any molding Base:Synthetic Rubber Latex Moisture Resistance:. } configuration.Available prefinished in dark oak stain Clean-Up:Clean tools and Excellent with urethane varnish or with urethane varnish alone. remove adhesive smears,use Freeze Thaw:5 cycles - F p Also available unfinished. soapy water before adhesive - -_ ^ G375/376 Waterproof Adhesive 'sets.After adhesive sets- CAUTION:Do not permit - p use mineral spirits,exercising installation to go below CG375 is available in five-callon,one-gallon,and one-quart safe practice regarding flam- freezing within the first 24 - -- cans.C-376 is available in tennunce and twenty-nine ounce Inability and toxicity, hours after application. cartridges,A strong,flexible,waterproof adhesive formulated for fast,easy application.Meets ASTM specifications C557. C-375/376 Construction Adhesive ,. An excellent,all-purpose adhesive for use with wall panels, A strong waterproof construction adhesive formulated - metal acoustic tile,and insulation(except Polystyrene).Will especially for fast and easy installation of paneling products. - bond surfaces together quickly or provide a long"open Available in 10 oz.and 29 oz.cartridges and 1 quart,1 _ time"of up to 30 minutes,if required.Use to apply paneling gallon,and 5 gallon cans. over furring strips or solid backing.The synthetic rubber - -base adhesive remains pliable—compensate for movement Shelf Life:1 year Heat Resistance: of structural surfaces of up to 1/8".Application to both Calor:Cream Good to 140°F. - surfaces to be joined(cohesive method)produces a very Consistency:Medium grade Moisture Resistance: strong immediate bond.Spreads easily at 70-.A layer of viscosity/smooth paste Excellent water in the container will keep the adhesive pliable during Coverage:See chap below Flammability:Flammable and in-between use.Covers approximately 60 sq.ft.per Weight Per Gallon:10 lbs. Bead gallon(one coat)using a notched spreader,approximately Base:Synthetic Rubber Size Size Coverage 122 L.F.,1/8"bead from 10 oz.cartridge,and 350 L.F.,1/8" Solvent Type:Naphtha 10 oz. 1/8" 122 lin.h. bead from 29 oz.cartridge. Clean-Up:Naphtha—exer. 3/16" , 54 lin.Ill I\ C-551 Water Borne Adhesive cising safe practice regarding 1/4" 30 lin.h. Available in five-gallon cans and 29-ounce cartridges.A flammability and toxicity. 29 oz. 1/8" 350 lin.It. highly water-resistant,non-flammable,all-purpose construc- Open Time:20 minutes 3/16" 160 lin.h. tion adhesive.Designed for installing Marlite brand interior depending upon temperature 1/4" 90 lin ft. wall surfacing products over existing porous-surfaced walls and humidity conditions Gallon 60 sq.ft. or furring strips.Also recommended for bonding polystyrene Exposure:As low as -70°F. 5 Gallon 300 sq.h. foamboard,urethane fcamboard,tileboard,and decorative wood strips to any structurally-sound porous interior surface such as concrete,drywall,furring strips,and plaster.Covers `3 up to approximately 60 sq.k.(one coat)per gallon,approxi- Ltd.1 rada(LpsAngeles) _ _ Edimately 350 L.F.,1/8"bead from cartridge 29 oz. Port worth Dover Atlanta , t SUBSTRATE: - Federal Specifications LLL- All Marlite Brand Hardboard Products &816b A.B.P.A.PS 58 73 in this catalog have a flame spread FINISHED: rating of 200 or under except where Federal Specification LLL B 605 noted differently. Class 1 Finish A.B.PA.PS 5973 }x f . .. CODES: J. �f FHA Standards Property _ +(' °�7rfrf0` - Standardsi:-'. CLASSIFIED \. International Conference of -Mineral antl FiDerpoartl` Building Officials Fire Hazard Classification: (Report no.m6sl Nationwide Availability Southern Building Code (gased on 100 The network of Commercial Division Regional Operations Congress(SBCC) -'for untreated Red Oak) Centers can help you coordinate shipments to lob sites, Building Officials arta Code _ nationwide.Each Operations Center serves as a distribution Administrators(BOLA) Flame Spread `200 and service point for all Marlite' Brand products.They are a Many local regional codes Fuel Contributed :1130 key ingredient in the Commercial Division's hard-earned Listed in: Underwriters Laboratories Smoke Developed .350 reputation for total dependability.Regional Operations Building Materials Directory Centers are located in: Marlite.Masonite.Korelock and Barnside are registered trademarks of 1.Dover,Ohio(216)364-7561 Masonite Corporation. 202 Harger Street,44622 Note:The products represented in this catalog have been reproduced 2.Edison,New Jersey(201)225.1650 by the finest commercial printing process available.For absolute 80 Newfield Avenue,Raritan Center 08617 accuracy in product selection and calor,the Commercial Division of Masonite Corporation recommends that actual product samples - 3.Ft,Worth,Texas(817)625-6443 be used. 4601 Pylon Staffer.76106 4.Atlanta.Georgia(404)355-1980 1721 Marietta Boulevard.NW.30318 FORM NO.PK2.09851 COMMERCIAL DIVISION 5.LaMirada.California(213)944.0157 'EFFECTIVE 1011/84 MA50NITE OOVER,O111044622 121613436621 Of(714)523-2500 cc..o..00. 16024 Phoebe Avenue.90638 ALTERNATE HARD BOARD PANELING ' PRODUCT BULLETIN # 11-88 March 31 , 1988 TO: ,, CHAIN HEADQUARTERS FROM: J. C. Bailey SUBJECT: FIRETEST I USG Interiors and the Marlite Division is proud to announce its new Firetest I EMEM panels. . .the easy way to create a Class "A" fire rated wall surfaces. The panels carry a 5 flame spread with 15 smoke developed. The Firetest I panels have a revolutionary new incombustible substrate made of a ceramic phosphate alloy (CPA) reinforced with fiberglass. The rugged CPA substrate has the durability and strength to withstand the rigors of high-use commercial environments. It resists water related damage, which commonly plague other materials. The CPA substrate will not crack, crumble or disintegrate under high temperature or extreme humidity changes.- A The laminated face has a clear seal coating for increased abrasion resistance, color stability and easier cleanability. An attractive and functional palette of six woodgrains and solid colors are available to choose from, for both decorative and sanitary wall applications. The woodgrains are available in 4'x8' , 9' or 10-' x 1/8" and the solid colors are available in 4'x8' or 10' x 1/8". Matching vinyl wrapped aluminum moldings are available in both 8' and 10' lengths. Custom colors and sizes are also available. Included is the Firetest I Brochure, and Installation Instructions. Samples and additional literature are available through your Marlite Sales Specialist. Inventories are available for immediate shipment from Dover, Ohio. The Marlite Division has five regional operation centers and thirty-one zone managers strategically located throughout the country. Our Marlite sales people are available, as always, to help you in meeting your requirements for fire rated wall products. The enclosed business reply card will assist you in obtaining further information about the new Firetest I product line. If you have any questions or if I may be of assistance, feel free to contact me or our Marlite Sales Specialist. Gh i aures C.. Bailey Senior Product Manager Sanitary Wall Products JCB/ml I'll M-11 I 4al,a . 'i q 41� 111 2A Of 11 i IvZci I�I I 1��-,t. A 11 1 "A 17 '}Sr i� I J� � f � y. r ]]]t it a�q , f y . . 'I", , i itIIi P)11 IM Il i 71' 7,Vf,*Vf I 710, VY MW t ME , I I 1AL- IT 11 If .n . . � .{! �' ;413d. tr.�� ' '! •R .. . I' c.tl;_t � iF }� � �5`��r 6;. t� Il� .�.#: u,f{ t5f' Y��I �r{l�I Iiillir; I I IT I � I EIlf, si'l -olo, ,A\ VMS LK • aj AL The Beauty And Durability Of Marlite°Brand Plank, Class A-Rated: C Years of development have resulted in a — - Class A rated Marlite brand plank product. Marlite Brand Firetest'"Planks share the beauty, durability and easy handling char- f • _ - - acteristics of traditional Marlite Brand Plank. But a new fire-rated substrate ?" offers the ability to meet increasingly- strict fire codes. i • T i I v I 1 ! Installation W1 sa v.T.W11 vOak Wvpn, 372 s2 Ti.Clnapgeel 0ok oevgn. 16" wide module provides easy handlin <-xo,.d.T.ft'oo 2-Ko,ee.TeftrxI P Y 9 and less waste.Tongue and groove joinery } .1 system allows for a monolithic application, without divider moldings. Recommended application is over drywall or existing walls, ff using Marlite Brand Adhesive. Specially- designed pecially- desi ned clips are used to hold planks , firmly in place until adhesive dries. Properties ,it Thickness(1/4" nominal).240 t .010" typical �= M' - +• ', Weight 1.522-1.650 psf typical '-' 338UFT.CarugewkD vge. a2o-sneT. rvomalookDe.p,,. Flexural Strength (Modulus of Rupture) <-x«.g.smoo,e smcv�n.fi�lsl,egwle,< 3000 psi typical Finish Selection Water Absorption (24 hour immersion) Stock finishes are Galley Oak Design, 8% maximum Thickness Swell (24 hour immersion) Chaparrel Oak Design, Natural Oak Design and Carriage Oak Design.All are manu- 5% maximum factured in a unique multi-step process to Moisture content 3% insure durability,easy maintenance and product consistency. Performance Flame-Spread Rating: Marlite Brand Firetest Planks Flame Spread 5 Marlite Brand Firetest Planks are a pre- Fuel Contributed 0 finished woodfiber product, 16" wide Smoke Developed 0 (nominal), 8'high, 1/4" thick modules have Tested according to ASTM E-84 by an Independent melamine protection for wipe-clean durabil- Laboratory. ity. Tongue and groove joinery system Availability allows for natural movement of,plank with Marlite brand products are available, changes in the atmosphere, instead of nationwide, at any of the five Commercial fighting the shrinking and swelling like Division Regional Operations Centers. La other paneling products. Mirado, California(714)523-2500 or(213) 944-0157;Atlanta,Georgia(404)355-1980; Dover Ohio(216)343-6621; Edison, New Jersey(201) 225-1650; Fort Worth, Texas (817)625-6443. _ ►� I�, COMMERCIAL DIVISION MASONITE - Masonite Corporation,commercial Division,202 Harger St.,Dover,Ohio 44622.(216)30.16621. BIGELOW®Carpet Specifications Contract Carpet by BIGELOW—SANFORD, INC: C SC-4BH8 ROB' S INNERSPACE CODE: 4BH8 DATE • FACE: 100% Dupont XTI October 6, 1987 Continuous Filament Nylon • Customized Geometric Pattern SPECIFICATION& PRODUCTMATA TYPE Tufted— Cut Pile STOCKWIDTHS STOCKCOLORS 12' (3.66 m) 1 GAUGE 1/10 Maximum Dye Lot Dye Method STITCHES 7.75 Approximately, Per INCH 5500 sq. yds. Printed PILE HEIGHT sq. m APPROXIMATE 5/32" 100% Dupont XTI FLAMMABILITY FACE YARN Continuous Filament DOC-FFl-70 Nylon Bigelow has a continuing guarantee on file with the Federal Trade Commission. C YARN PLY 2 Flooring Radiant Panel Test YARN WEIGHT 18 oz./sq.yd. NFPA-253, ASTM-E-648 BACKING Primary— Synthetic Class I - Glue Down MATERIALS Secondary— Natural SMOKE DENSITY TOTAL WEIGHT 59 oz./sq.yd. NBS Smoke Density Chamber NFPA-258 450 or less STATIC TEST AATCC Test Method 134-1979 less than 3.5 kv INSTALLATION Direct Glue Down should be made in accordance with Bigelow's recommended procedures. Conventional refers to standard tufted installation procedures. 1126/88 Scotc(, 9grdTReAfMeNr All specifications subject to normal manufacturing tolerance. Grade, Specification, Test Data and Colors subject to change without notice. All metric measurements are approximate. - "` This carpet,as specified, is for use on floors and not as a wall covering. Any test results listed above are relative only to its use as a floor covering. Acceptance of Orders subject to Bigelow's"Conditions of Sale." Printed in U.S.A. Bigelow ® Bigelow-Sanford Inc Space 3416 Dallas Trade Mart Dallas, TX 75201 FINE CAR QET SINCE 1825 214-748-4676 y. PIZZA HUT October 6, 1987 To whom this may concern: This will certify that carpet to be installed in various Pizza Huts, identified as SC-413H8, was tested with the following results under report #32423: Critical Radiant Flux ASTM 4-640 Glue Down Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average 1.10 1.10 1 .10 1.10 NBS Smoke ASTM E-662 Test 1 Test 2 Test 4 Average Non Flaming 373 377 381 373 Flaming 87 113 98 99 Static AATCC - 134 - (Neolite) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Step 1, 500 1,400 1, 600 Scuff 1, 500 1, 300 1, 600 The results were obtained in the NVLAP approved Bigelow-Sanford Laboratory. Since there is variability in the degree of repeat- ability within the laboratory and the degree of reproducibility between laboratories, test data can vary considerably depending on the test conducted. Yours truly, Bett wolfl - egl/14 Executive Offices: Box 3089 Greenville,South Carolina 29602 BIGELOW-SANFORD,INC. P.O. BOX 3089 GREENVILLE, S.C. 29602 3 PHONE (803) 299-2646 ' REPORT N0. 32423 DATE 10/15/86 SUBJECT Electrostatic Propensity of Carpets • t I-M-NUFACTURER Bigelow-Sanford,Inc. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION: CT-04047A • p This is to certify that a carpet sample identified as above was tested for electrostatic propensity in accordance with AATCC-134 Test Method. .TEST ASSEMBLY: TeSt 'specimen was mounted as part of carpet flooring system comprised of modules over concrete. The maximum static voltage generated at 207. RH and 70•F was 3500 Volts or less. r Approved By: BIGELOW-SANFORD,INC. Reference: Report Number 32423 Date 10/15/86 Electrostatic propensity of Carpets AATCC 134/CRI 102, NVLAP Code 03/EO1, Bigelow-Sanford Test T-213. This laboratory is accredited by NVLAP of the U.S. Department of Commerce as having the competence to perform specified tests in accordance with pre- scribed test metnod and accreditation criteria. .BIGELOW-SANFORD, INC. .P. 0.'BOX 3089 GREENVILLE, S. C. 29602 A PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION: CT-04047A DATE: 10/28/86 Flooring Radiant Panel: This is•to certify that a carpet sample �- identified as above was tested for critical radiant flux in accordance with ASTM Test Method ASTM E-648, NVLAP Code 03/F04, Bigelow-Sanford Test T-232. , TEST ASSEMBLY: Specimens were mounted as part of: Meets or exceeds: Average Critical Radiant Flux, Watts/sq. cm. n A direct Glue Down System using NuBroadlok Adhesive. .45 A Carpet Flooring System using Standard 50 oz. rubberized i jute/hair cushion. --- 1. A Carpet Module Loose Lay System without any adhesive. -- r t A Carpet Module Release System using 3M Blue Glue. --- This laboratory is accredited by NVLAP of the U. S. Department of Commerce as having the competence to perform above tests in accordance with prescribed test method and accreditation criteria. NBS Smoke: This is to certify that a carpet sample identified as above was tested for "Specific Optical Density of Smoke generated by solid materials" in accordance with NFPA 258, ASTM E-662, 79, Bigelow-Sanford Test T-219. The Maximum Average Specific Optical density is: Non-Flaming - 450 or less than 450 Flaming - 450 or less than 450. Approved by: Bigelow-Sanford, Inc. Reference: Report Number 32423 Report Date 10/15/86 HPMA FLAMESPREAD CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Association provides a product certification The;Hardwood Plywood Manufacturers pread properties. This program is based on the selection and program-for flames testing of panels within a given marketing line on the basis of that combination of factors that theoretically should give the highest flamespread values. Such factors as panel thickness, specific gravity, color of stain, type of lamination, surface texture, and product mix aretaken into consideration in the selection of flamespread samples. While it is standard procedure to report fuel contribution and smoke developed values, the HPMA label identifies only the flamespread class. The label is evidence that the marketing line has been tested and inspected in accordance with the HPMA' Flamespread Inspection and Certification Program Procedures. The HPMA label is displayed below and indicates conformance of the tested samples to the Type' iI glue bond requirements as set forth in PS 51-71, Voluntary Product Standard for Hardwood and Decorative Plywood, and conformince to the Flamespread Class (200 or less) as determined by the test procedures described in ASTM E84. GLUE BOND 4`� ��UfgClq�f�f� FLAME D OR LESS TYPE IIASTM E84 PS 51 -71 y 49 O MILL (NUMBER) �S"n ry'�"Yt s+7� •F i > r*t 3 .r 3 � 2 -" t-sro ' vy [ ++ �^ 4 4 a _n h t ..r.. Y¥. f ?R 85 �, F'�s1{V� "✓=i l Yi � 4 4^ F .. \ 3 � ; 1 P' ��:MaS�• �°' Y w �.:� 1 �u g�•� �4+ �'� 4, r i 2 rel nem, ` I � V - ' ve a P { � y y I 6C 2 4 r k � j tf IF p 4 cxS i t. -A; �'� Il r9 jjjjjQ Z, �{ • ; x u .r f 00000 n C ` { 0 - .+ .•� " ti' r c N O J O m > > , stl tfv wvn �:�. ' t a m 0$v t C m t Ik T X717 r t 4 C f ff 1 ' I$e NIF ft'�L •.t m : c m mmOS iic o O.0 .mi m lC iC O ado Q i t c mmp m OIC-.A:m o a ?;: -� �s es;. ,�', "d �■ m m a y j 0,8 O n:. d r v po o [PpA�/ ■�qg� �j h r m 0 W:J m m 3 m m „ o}O �'tl m rot a I. R ♦ z t df 3 k417t a � 2Z Npl J. y , OP/OVERALL PRODUCT IN PLACE 9.17/Dy �T- Kempiy® frp surfaced panel Description: Kemply is a wood substrate with a tough, hard, embossed Glasbord frp panel laminated to one or both sides. This .05" thick, Class C rated, fiberglass _ I ' reinforced plastic surface provides a durable,easy-to- maintain interior finish. It's ideal for use in areaswhere cleanliness is required. Kemply panel has structural K strength and rigidity. It may be installed directly to a "7 'i~' \ stud wall. Surface: The surface is a combination of chopped fiberglass roving and polyester resin that provides a hard, durable, highly cleanable x. k finish. Substrate: Plywood (APA, CD exterior).Othersubstrates ka ,° such as foam,particle board,dry wall,etc.are available depending on suitability. Inquiries 0 are welcomed. Benefits: • Structuralstrength • Installs like regularwood paneling • Easyto clean • USDA accepted • Scratch and abrasion resistant • Does y - - not retain odors • Resists mild acids and alkaline solution • Minimal maintenance t' ;;. MUSES AND APPLICATIONS: Kemply panels are recommended for installation where sanitation, s as well as structural strength, is important: 1. Food processing assembly room walls.(Glasbord wainscot further protects heavy abuse areas.) Flower cooler walls. 3. Cold storage cooler exterior as well as interior walls. William �tr SIZES, THICKNESSES & COLORS: Sam z E085-P31 _ .31" (5/16") 36" - - t 1.3 lb �;Kemply y y.: E085-P50 .50" (1/2") --.55" 1.7 1b +� *' .:.. _ white ,63" (5/8") .68" <. 2.0 Ib '�' 1 4 oz. r 4 x 8' E085-P63 surfaced ,}, -. -, E085-P75 paneling 4'x 10' .75" (3/4") - ''.80" 2.4 Ib :''' N'�` • .:', ` ,y ' a,x t.--' • =' E070-P31 beige .31" (5/16") ?'.36" 1.3 lb. :"' * a-1.4 oz. T - - Other panel sizea,surface thicknesses,and colors available by quotation. 4 ALTERNATE , 1 4 11 d h WALL fINISH w I, @ .KITCHEN hei � ■k bbl I FIR - tc' 14 ( '1 1 11 111 r BOR D i I frp;fl� ,panel '� +I er 1�1 ' i 1:1 t 1 l II`�r■�1 1 1 i ' r ' �. ZA 1! 1 1 f f _ ,r Y t�' I I 4yl if, Y 1� ' 1(I lt. 1 f l 11(I :• ' 111 ° S ��ltl I r s y ]! I F II I' 1 L 1 .kI1'..l I 'rr y 14 , r }.: IF � It I l I II I� I �. . f i'I • ' r 1 r i:. a ' 1 Ire 1 r tY 3 , 1 Ilr Il f4°t( ( E1> a 1 1 - a 14 S t t e r r l{1 ,le ,1r 1 t "1 < 4 nr , r 111rI If I I e fi Ir 1 1 I, I t 1 Y 5 NO '1 1 .r r f r l 1 Y. 1 f - a 1'%all 1_ ( r r 4 a r r Sr SJl rlt f Y J f t I1 I L , 11 r �i r r rt rl t IF , - L IF I} It K�ML4TErtCORwOF2ATION . P 25, gnols-soa3M X'i6erglea.r�ntorcetC Plesdc .. sem;. Will i ©1`p,��'.",'(��11rte Corporetldn- Glas6ord Reg;U.$ Pai Off` ,, k LOW SMOKE FIRE-X GLASBORD® TECHNICAL DATA: J .I AVAILABILITY �a Sizes Product Color Finish Nominal Nominal Number Thickness Weight/Sq. Ft. 4'x 8',4'x 10' Widths:48"&96" BES385-X White Embossed 0.09" 0.7 Ib. Lengths: 5'to 45' Ceiling panel sizes: BES485-X White Embossed 0.12" 0.9 lb. 2'x 2',2'x 4' PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Flexural Strength (PSI). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 — 24 x 103 Flexural Modulus (PSI). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.6 —0.9 x 106 Tensile Strength (PSI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 — 12 x 103 Tensile Modulus (PSI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 — 1.5 x 106 Impact Strength (IZOD) (ft. lbs./in. notched). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 — 14 Barcol Hardness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 50 — 60 Coefficient of Expansion lin./in./a Fl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 —3.4 x 10'5 INSTALLATION Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord paneling in- surface should be free of bumps, projections, Panels are easily worked with portable stalls similarly to most building panels. It can and misalignments. Rough orbadly misaligned power equipment. Carbide tipped tools are be applied to furring strips or directly to block concrete block walls should be furred for best recommended for best results. Panels require j predrilling for either nails or screws. Use #;or poured concrete walls. It can also be install- appearance.Studded wallsshould also bealign- nonrusting,noncorroding type fasteners. - ",'ed directly over a stud framed wall. Method ed before installing panels. . . Care should be taken to seal the joints with an accepted sealant or caulking(we recommend a silicone-type) to assure a moistureproof Ll of installation must be in conformance with installation. Moldings add to the finished When installing long lengths of paneling, local building codes. appearance and aid in making a watertight always begin at one end of the panel and work To assure a pleasing, flat appearance, wall installation. toward the other. SHIPPING: Standard-size panels are generally stacked and wrapped with NONWARRANTY: The facts stated and the recommendations made corrugated board and secured to a skid with steel strapping.For additional herein are based on our own research and/or the research of others and protection when necessary,the stack may receive are believed to be accurate.No guaranty of their accuracy is made,how- awaterproof outer wrapper. Long length ever, and unless otherwise expressly Provided in written contract, the panels are generally coiled on skids for easiest products discussed are sold without conditions or warranties,express or shipment. implied. Purchasers should make their own tests to determine the suit- STORAGE: Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord ability of such products for their particular purposes. Nothing contained panels should be stored indoors. They must be herein shall be construed to be a recommendation to use or as a license stored on edge to prevent accumulation of moisture between the panels to operate under or to infringe any existing patents. which can cause water marks. Panels should also be protected from exposure to sunlight. NOTICE: Like other organic building materials(e.g.wood),panels made of fiber glass reinforced plastic resins are combustible and should be CERTIFICATION: Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord paneling is accepted used in compliance with local building codes and insurance regulations. by the S.D.A. and is proven to be as cleanable as a No. 3 finish on - stainless steel. - - - - — LOOK FOR'.'`.itis threads on the back — your assurance it's Kemlite's - KEMLITE CORPORATION frp flat panel..A,combination,of blue and red threads identifies low smoke Fire x Graiboid paneling. - ' P. O. Box 429, Joliet, Illinois 60434 LOOK FOR :_.�the UL labs Lon low smoke, fire rated panels — your Telephone: 815/7251112 (Joliet) assurance of certified panels. 3121242 4827 (Chicago) Form No.803 Rev. Printed in U.S.A. NOBODY WANTS A FIRE , Nobody plans a fire. But, fires do happen. And, when they happen, want to see the exit signs. Protection Association fires. Your building needs you want as much time as You don't want your res states that asphyxiation walls and ceilings that possible to get people out by smoke and gases ac �� tr counts for more than 62% s'�• T1 a i O. r l 3i of the building with as lit- by ° large volumes of $ r 01 will not produce alarge tle hazard as possible. You smoke. The National Fire of all d'eaths m'building volume of smoke. LOW SMOKE FIRE-X GLASBORDt PANELING GIVES YOU THAT EXTRA MARGIN OF FIRE SAFETY. It's the safest frp building material—ideal for use in fast food chains and restaurants. , It �H I f <' y� � � 1� Sv v x sal •' � z r,t4 .pltr t6l�t ) f) rp^tp,,, fI♦'^ m,- J t L *'ii 1 awi z �(j '}crn e 4 �z w °�,1�.rhA'1 P'G4.ttac >a : r 7 J 4} F r q 2 Hitt {tl'y''sl I.S`agt4 — tl 161 3 �y ?Cl�ypl��{�J. kGl7 �.. I }�� 4 S y ! 4,: ✓ ,� ,Jn1 tii f � � r ' �, � '��1 M7 t _ • � • ?aG_ },,5� ggmbossed sur ace g 2 � �' Low smoke Fire-X Glasbord flame spread 50, fuel contri- lengths to install one-piece, Use low smoke Fire-X Glas- panel is a fiber glass reinforced buted 5, smoke developed 75. floor-to-ceiling on your walls, bord paneling as a wall and plastic (frig) material —tough, Laboratory tests show the or as a one-piece wainscot the ceiling panel en— durable, easy to clean. Its em- smoke that does develop is length of your hallway or cor- bossed, pebble-like surface is light gray with a low level of ridor. It's easy to install, re- scratch and abrasion resistant. irritation and on traces of • kitchens y quires minimal maintenance. It resists stain. . .does not re- carbon monoxide. Wherever you want a clean- • food preparation areas tain odors. . .is accepted by Available in a variety of able,durable wall surface with • walk-in coolers and freezers the USDA. And, low smoke thicknesses, low smoke Fire-X an extra margin of fire safety, ■ storage areas Fire-X Glasbord has now been dlasbord panel comes in stan- low smoke Fire-X Glasbord ■ washrooms classified by UL with a class B dard building panel sizes, in panel is your answer. ■ customer service areas Get the full story today. KEMLITE CORPORATION P.0._ Box 429, Joliet, Illinois 60434 Glasbord Reg. U.S.Pat.Off. ©1918 Kemlite Corporation NOTICE: Like other organic building materials(e.g.wood),panels made of fiberglass reinforced plastic resinsare combustible and should be used in compliance with local building codes and insurance regulations. ALTERNATE WALL FINISH Marlite° Brand FRP . . . @ KITCHEN Sanitary Walls Can Still Be Beautiful. n a ------------ k � t €[y � d ! . t GY:IIA h3�v�di � JSt ,JIi! fj th T,-.h� ty� Yr1)1��b1��t4F !'J �" 4 ..— .tfi f .1 i� tli it tt,.It Sf s � ij ��wi 5� .til rLr , p..vf)�41/xtlt�yF; � � F , ` � � r -�� • gill, F' ..:.. r Y You can create walls and ceilings pleasing �, h e Y to the eye while still meeting rigid sani. � l tation,maintenance and durability require- ments.Marlite Brandi FRP(Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester)is a tough chemical and water resistant surface with an attractively embossed design.Harmonizing moldings,part of an entire FRP system,help present a clean appearance without grout or Money-saving scare lines. Maintenance Whether you steam clean,hose A Washable, Steam- down or simply wipe clean, Cleanable S Stem maintenance is fast and easy. y Marlite Brand FRP resists - Marlite Brand FRP is USDA approved to rotting,staining,denting,splin- meet government standards and require. tering and corrosion.There are I s ments for steam cleanability and sanitation. no grout or mortar lines to - �+ The hard,non-porous surface will not attract dirt. _ absorb stains,support mold or retain odor, i i Moldings and sealant prevent moisture from l seeping behind panels. Four Attractive Colors To Accent Time-saving Installation Or Harmonize No specialized labor is required. For wall Marlite Brand FRP installation,simply establish center line, allows you to keep spread adhesive,apply panels and moldings pace with modern Marlite Brand FRP With sealant.For ceilings,install grid design trends.Four system and put pre-cut drop-in panels in standard colors;white, Keeps Showing Up In place.The only tools required are a saw, natural almond,antique The Cleanest Places caulking gun,drill,file,hammer and plumb gold and beige;are line or level. available to create Wherever sanitation is a factor you'll find attractive working Marlite Brand FRP.Animal confinement ! �. environments.Special buildings.Canneries.Cheese plants.Clean Three Standard Sizes - colors,sizes and thick rooms.Cold storage warehouses.Conveni. " ence stores.Dairies and dairy stores.Fish. Standard sizes are 4'x 8'(20 tbs.),4'x 9'(23 nesses are available in eries.Food preparation or processing areas. lbs.)and 4'x 10'(25 tbs.).A particularly high quantity orders. Freezer warehouses.Frozen food plants. strength-to-weight ratio makes the panelss3' Standard Colors Kitchens.Laboratories.Locker rooms. durable.A low coefficient of expansion ` fji.i;'Y (Top to bottom) Lunch rooms.Meat plants.Milk houses and assures flatness(approximately 1/16"on 4' v':.,r- 'rc! ,:' White barns.Shipping areas.Restaurant kitchens. with 100°F temperature change). �J, Beige Restrooms and shower stalls.Slaughter P ^p' Natural Almond houses.Supermarkets.Walk-in coolers. `"'-•"` Antique Gold Washrooms. Specifications Marlite Brand Martite Brand FRP Panels: Call The Shall be 4'x 8;9'or 10'x 3/32"Marlite Brand Class "A/I" Fire Rated Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester panels with Commercial Division FRP Panels 8'ordadh adhesive d moldings,Marlite Regional Operations Brand adhesive and sealant as supplied by g tD Now you can meet highly-restrictive fire the Commercial Division,Masonite Center Nearest To You. codes with decorative Class All low Corporation,Dover,Ohio.Materials must be flame/low smoke panels.Also USDA applied strictly in accordance with printed Part of our extensive commitment to the approved,the panels maintain all of the installation instructions provided. Commercial marketplace is our five durability,cleanability and easy main- Marlite Brand Class"All"Fire-Rated Regional Operations Centers throughout tenance qualities of the standard FRP FRP Panels: the country,Each is available for sales panels.Available in P100FR,white only,and assistance and to better help coordinate four standard sizes,2'x 4'x 3132"111 4'x ReinforcedP 9'orer panels. Fiberglass production and shipments after the sale. ( I Reinforced Polyester panels. 8'x3/32"121 tbs.),4'x 9'x 3132'(23 tbs.)and FRP Panels shall be installed with 8'or 10' REGIONALISALES 4'x 10'x 3132"(26 tbs.).Other sizes and harmonizing moldings,adhesive and DISTRIBUTION CENTERS colors are available on special order. sealant as supplied by the Commercial Division,Masonite Corporation,Dover,Ohio. HEADQUARTERS: Material must be applied strictly in 202 Harger,P.O.Box 250 accordance with the printed installation Dover,Ohio 44622 instructions provided. 216/3436621 Marlite Brand FRP Drop-in SOUTHEAST: Ceiling System: 1721 Marietta Blvd.N.W. Shall be 2'x 4'(nominal)x 3132"Marlite Atlanta.Georgia 30318 Brand Fiberglass Reinforced Polyester 4041355-1980 panels as supplied by the Commercial MIDWEST: Division,Masonite Corporation,Dover, 202 Harger,P.O.Box 250 Ohio. Dover,Ohio 44622 The information herein is to assist cus 216/3436621 tomers in determining whether our EAST: products are suitable for their applica- 80 Newfield Avenue,Raritan Center tions.We request that customers inspect Edison,New Jersey 08617 and test our products before use and 2011225-1650 satisfy themselves as to contents and SOUTHWEST: suitability.Nothing herein shall con 4601 Pylon St. stitute a warranty,express or implied, Fort Worth,Texas 76106 including any warranty of merchandise- 8171625-6443 bility or fitness.nor is protection from WEST: any law or patent inferred.All paten) 1 rights are reserved. 6024 Phoebe Avenue. LaMirada(Los Angeles),California 90638 7141523-2500 or 213/944-0157 Mande and xorelock are registered trademarks c!Masonite Corporaron . COMMERCIAL DIVISION MASNNITE DOVE R,OHIO 44622 121613436621 va..o.amr PLEATED SHADE I MATERIAL (A/C & R/I DECORS) PLEATED SHADE FABRIC F.R. fabrics are woven polyester. Sheer is 100% Trevira F.R. and all others have chemical finishes which are applied to increase the flame resistant characteristics. TEST METHODS: , National Fire Prevention Association Standard 701 Vertical Test. This test measures the char length, the after flame time, and whether or not the drippings burn. The 701 test is the standard test for measuring the flame resistance of textiles and film nationally. State of California Administrative Code, Title 19, Public Safety, Article 4, Section 1273.3 (Small Scale Test).This test is more stringent when compared to other recognized tests and is consequently widely accepted as certification of flame resistance in other geographic areas. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 302, "Flammability of Interior Mate- rials;' as specified in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 49, Transportation, Section 571.302. PLEATED SHADES STACK SO TIGHTLY THEY ALMOST DISAPPEAR As well as being extremely compact,two shades oper- ating independently on one headrail is a feature which gives pleated shades day-today convenience.The .j shade below left,is fully extended to 104 inches.The shade at right,also 104 inches,is only 2 inches high i = in its fully raised position. i I i `f} - _z - 1�is� .v v is s_ August 9, 1982 - {' Mr. Leon Jelinick c/o Mr. Skeet Morrison Window Coverings, Inc. 1` P.O. Box 11303 -+ Wichita, Kansas 67202 ff Dear 'Mr. Jelinick: t._ Skeet Morrison has asked that we provide you with specificatior,s " on the various materials that hopefully, we will be producing g%g for you in the very near future. - TABLECLOTH - Production samples of our utility weight material were submitted to United States Testing Company ffi and they report as follows: a: "The production samples meet the requirements r:1 of the State of California Bureau of Home Furnishings as specified in their Regulation ,kA Technical Bulletin No. 117, Section E dated - y;.,. February 1975." UPHOLSTERY These fabrics will be manufactured to comply / with the flammability requirements of Boston Fire Department, MS-302 and Port of New York _ '.,..� Authority. WALLCOVERINC 1 . ';. These fabrics will be manufactured to comply with the flame spread and smoke generation ""' requirements of Federal Specification CCC-W-408a for Wallcoverings, dated October 7, 1971, as amended August 22, 1973. r a; If you need any additional information, we will do our utmost 7 to provide it, if possible. Cordially, F61ix McIntyre • -�: Vice-President cc: L. Botwinick Nat Schiffmiller 84 Edwards Place Valley Stream, N.Y. 11580 (5 16) 561-2437 T0: J &`Cy.Products , Inc. April 25, 1982 239 N. Rock Island Wichita, Ks , 67202 Atten: John Roeser Dear John: Attached is the Fire Test Data that you requested for the drapery fabric Vista color#12, This data will confirm that Vista meets all the necessary U.S . commercial Fire Codes, Respectfully yours , Nat Schiffmiller BETTER FABRICS TESTING ® uREAU. lwc. Charles Samelson Inc. 261 Fifth Avenue 101 WEST 31st STREET ..:.New York,New York 10016 NEW YORK, N.Y. 10001 REPORT N0. r 14508 r (212) 888-7090 J afifirate of Ice ¢' `August21,1980 This report certifies laboratory tests of a fabric identified'by client as: 0' 371 Hoechst Fiber— 100 % Polyester submitted to determiner r . FIRE RESISTANCE . : (City of Boston) Afterflame * Burning4of 'Aft'erglow ! (Seconds) Drippings (Seconds) .`. Length (Seconds) Test 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Test 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 f Test 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 , Width Test 1 0.0 0.0 0 0 " Test 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Test 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 REOUIRE4ENTS: k No specimen shall show afterflame or burning of drippings greater than two seconds. No specimen shall have an afterglow of more than 40seconds. t Page, Il Report 14508 August 21.1980 EVALUATION: This fabric does meet the.reouirements`for fire res�stancd when tested in accordance with grocedu�es as outlined in Ordinance of: 1959, Chapter 3- ,.:+ Document No•34 of City of Boston Fire Prevention Code. —. a-. BETTER FABRICS TESTING BUREAU, INC: Testa " Reference c.y`��" 14508 /` G'" I `.`• i�LG/L ab A � Yt q x' Richard A. Rutherford. u Vice ,President '&:Director of Operations .i DRAPERY MATERIAL � rl�,rE7@N,I.t�,k*`�}•�"v_Y"3i.n,w'"-"' " ,.�,.w�yr//F�Ih'MW !hn�r`tw"Wvi�*\w`.it.>�t*"wt.,.,.,'�fay'S'`afl'.n�'3°`^''Wi�w,�.m,`�1P,-3.,,s�J'!��*�'dc" .n Y wT��'!y,^. (.R.t.V/-'I vYYJDECOR) ECOR) `90 Gti� tW . In✓! ,�jq4ai- vw.a� lA,0jS✓Ir 1 (+ �t � �gitr'. _ � �c .z£�.:.sr c�� -..,."'�� 'k � j *'•-,y ��!-e�p''0r'-,?2Mi Y� � Y�;��.Y? Pitts€ hrl ,.. I ^9334 CERTIFICATE �r ' „rr ' OF NON-FLAMMABILITY �f) ;j,'" 1 )• '�!�` Ci 4th l �.g it by UNE! �USTRIES.INC. t4 1333 MERCHANDISE MART 6 W 51)3 Ihp 4;.ley �+tr♦♦ay91 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60656 7 {' FSu(t , .' This is to certify that the material known as SHEERFLAME lli (name of cloth) t}:, tt�l} t- 1 rs:. - \iiia •�Fj' �Has been fire resistant treated. 0 100%Fiberglass is non-combustible. IN P pdXr ➢E}F }C-Inherently Flame Resistant combined with % 41 :` olvester_% The fire retardant material meets or exceeds the following specifications: " ' '•� t 1. New York Cit Board of Standards&Appeals Calendar No. 703.63-SM. y X1787 li(i.°�i 2. State of California, Fire Marshall's Office Requirement No. C-58, C-58-1, �rtgs�ll I -ti, �t Till l 11 f 1v C-58.2. Dated 7-18.63. `rile tryA 3. N.F.P.A. Bulletin No. 701. r;,^l4 tlL � 4. Verticle Test Method 5903 of Federal Test Method Specification rI{MAIA CCC-T-191B and AATCC Test Method 34-1966. € 'i,.S.iJ �tlls.I+' I�'� .. r�!( laft Ji3 b7F' o 3 �1= 5. Fire Resistant Aspects of Federal Specifications: CCC-C-436C,MIL-C-14610, MIL-C-18387C,MIL-C-12095C,MIL-C-10895B,MIL-T-20618 and CCC-A-700E. ; �Yl� yP\ J & G Products,Inc. ,239 N.Rock Island,Wichita,K {,L J �(fq' Unitex dustries, Inc. G 'A V. } (Si6nat ure of, prized Person Int f.'lti,�r Sworn to b ore me this ` �,' dl f, , 1 11f , 31st day of Au 191982'10, (s tir t /1`/ a uyt J``e ^-�ytw''C--: � "0.k_ ql- �x-`3t.'e n +V ,Sy"Y..v+�+t wast:•? .R Y1b �„^, rY'. �p s,%+ +c�ac.'�.xsacx�w r�cxxr "l C. G INHERENTLY FLAME RETARDANT 48" WIDE - 100% POLYESTER C MACHINE WASHABLE AT 160° F. Complies with: N. Y., CALIF., BOSTON N.F.P.A. 701 :►�Ca�,s�c�x`��, w�a:.7a .rxxa'�'�s. ��+c�car�wY��r� c.�d WALLCOVERING (R/1 DECOR) H TM 4 ICY _ PLAIDS e STRIPES & BORDERS YORK ROLLAGE REQUIREMENTS METHOD II—BY CHART.Single Rolls of Sidewall Dis. To determine the correct amount of wallcoverings you Si we 1"a 8 FL riles 10FHig12FHigCeils o¢ need to order,use either of these simple methods. _ 36 10 12 12 .16 6 METHOD I—Square footage 60 12 12 16 16 6 (A) Measure distance in feet around the room. 12 16 16 16 6 (B) Measure height in feet from floor to ceiling. b 12 16 16 20 6 (C) Multiply width by height of each opening(Doors 52 a 16 1e 22 6 &Windows). s6 16 1r 20 26 r 60 16 is 20 24 3 Multiply distance(a) by height. (b) then subtract. (c) w 1a 20 22 26 10 from the total. To determine the number of single rolls 66 16 22 26 26 10 needed, divide the total square footage by 30. The 30 72 20 22 26 30 12 square feet figure allows for maximum waste in trim- �,,.,o....& .H..o.o.im.lar 30:a.n.1n...a ming and matching. Iwo op..;.ps o1 oNi..,s;'.. 2 i,sRj FIRE RATING TEST ) : Flame Spread: 0 Fuel Contnbt:txi: 5 °Li yyr�. a R -itSmoke Density 5 1Source.An.lndependent Test ng laboratory *,, 5 �� York wallcoverings-are resistant to grease and oils d substances *r t; are removed Immediately with a mild detergent and +w� �� ' q t �t-�.`Yt n -cYi k .p t "'3`r�e •1 n1a_e11.:�.3�Y.�ta.�Sutb�..a..�';.'i3.e;vt..�...�`.$. ��.�Yr-.k v-1 BOOTH SEAT & CHAIR PAD UPHOLSTERY (A/C & R/I DECORS) t �p�r�57�. 4iGYW` �� `5� I U% JT � 1 ¢aY BRAND FnpnIC Technical Data Bulletin UNIROYAL, Inc. • 312 N. Hill St,aet • P.O. Bo. 2000 • Mishawaka, Indiana 46544-1399 SPS-0152 12/28/81 Stoughton Plant UNIROYAL SPECIFICATION NAUGAHYDE EXPANDED VINYL UPHOLSTERY SPIRIT of '..Zb , EXHIBITOR, NFD.CHROME 1. Material: a. Coating shall consist of a vinyl resin base, suitably compounded, plasticized and expanded so as to be of the proper gage; be free from tackiness; have a suitable hand; and be flame, mildew and oil resistant. b. Base fabric shall be jersey knit appropriate to meet requirements listed below. 2. Special product properties : a. Flame, mildew and oil resistant. b. Designed to meet the physical properties requirements of Federal Specification CCC-A-680a, Class 2 Treated: (a) 1 Regular fire resistant; (b) Mildew resistant; and (c) Oil resistant. c. Anti-static slip finish. 3. Width - 54" minimum. Fed. Std. 191-5020 4 . - Weight - 24 . 8 + 1. 5 oz/yd2 . Fed. Std. 191-5041 5. Thickness - 50 +5 mils . CS-273-65 -4 nils 6 . Breaking Strength (Tensile) - Fed. Std. 191-5100 65 lbs . warp x 60 lbs . filler minimum. z BRAND FABRIC .•,.� wt ^,;I Technical Data Bulletin UNIROYAL, Inc. • 312 N. Hill Street • P.O. Box 2000 • Mishawaka, Indiana 46544-1399SPS-0152 12/28/81 CONTINULD - PAGE .3 20 . Flame Resistance (Vertical) - Fed. Std. 191-5903 After flame 2.0 seconds maximum Char length 3.0 inches maximum 21. Breaking Strength After Accelerated Aging (Tensile) - Fed. Std. 191-51--* +5850 Not less than 75% of the initial breaking strength, after aging 48 aours at 2120 to 2210F. 22 . Mildew Resistance (Soil Burial) - Fed. Std. 191-5100* + 5762 Breaking strength shall not be less than 75% of the strength before soil burial . 23. Oil Resistance (Mineral Oil) - 'CCC-A680A* Oil shall not permeate the coated fabric. *See Federal Standard CCC-A-680A for test methods and modifi- cations. **Spirit of ' 76 and Exhibitor do not conform to the requirements of CCC-A-680A which relate to Government Procurement such as inspection, packing, marking, AQL levels , sampling, delivery, etc. The requirements for physical properties listed above (except abrasion resistance and blocking) apply to the average of the test results from a sample. REV 7/25/85 FAM i I 1 — ,fia IE N S._.,ui naugahyd UNIROYAL GRAND FABRIC ^' Technical Data Bulletin UNIROYAL, Inc. • 312 N. Hill Street • P.O. Box 2000 • Mishawaka, Indiana 46544-1399 PORT CLINTON UNIROYAL SPECIFICATION PLANT SPS-0152 YFR45146 YFR45174 EXPANDED VINYL UPHOLSTERY YFR45776 YFR45782 1. :Material: a. Coating shall consist of a vinyl resin base, suitably compounded, plasticized and expanded so as to be of the proper gage; be free from tackiness; have a suitable hand; and be flame, mildew and oil resistant. b. Base fabric shall be jersey knit appropriate to meet requirements listed below. 2 . Special product properties: a. Flame, mildew and oil resistant. b. Designed to meet the physical properties requirements of Federal Specification CCC-A-680a, Class 2 Treated: (a) 1 regular fire resistant; (b) Mildew resistant; and (c) Oil resistants. SEE FOOTNOTE" c. Anti-static slip finish. 3. Width - 54" minimum. Fed. Std. 191-5020 4. Weight - 24 . 8 + 1. 5 oz/yd2 . Fed. Std. 191-5041 5. Thickness - 50 +5 mils. CS-273-65 6. Breaking Strength (Tensile) - Fed. Std. 191-5100 65 lbs. warp x 60 lbs . filler minimum a ANY l CONTINUED - PAGE 2 SPS-0152 8/31/81 7. Tearing Strength (Trapezoid) - Fed. Std. 191-5136* 14 lbs. warp x 12 lbs. filler minimum. 8. Abrasion Resistance (Wyzenbeek) - Fed. Std. 191-5304* No wear through to vinyl foam - 500 double rubs. 9. Adhesion of Coating - CS-273-65 3 lbs./inch minimum 10. Accelerated Weathering (Weather-O-Merter) - Fed. Std. 171-5804* No appreciable fading of color, discoloration, exudation or development of st.iffr.ess or tackiness. 120 hours exposure . 11. Hydrostatic Resistance - Fed. Std. 191-5512* 50 PSI minimum 12. Volatility - CCC-A680* 107 maximum 13. Plasticizer Loss - Activated Carbon Extration - CCC-A-680A* 107 maximum 14. Cold Resistance - minus 20° + 2°F. Fed. Std. 191-5874* The coating shall not crack through to the base cloth. 15. Flexing (Newark) - CS-273-65* No separation of the vinyl foam from the vinyl skin or base fabric after 15,000 cycles. 16. Stitch-Tear - CS-273-65 25 lbs. warp x 20 20 lbs. filler minimum 17. Blocking - Fed. Std/ 191-5872 scale rating 3 maximum 18. Crocking - Fed. Std. 191-5651 Good - minimum 19. Elongation (Ford Stretch test) - CCC-A-680A* 57 warp x 257 filler minimum CONTINUED - PAGE 3 SPS-0152 8/31/81 20. Flame Resistance (Vertical) - Fed. Std. 191-5903 After flame 2.0 '=',geconds maximum Char length 3.0 inches maximum 21. Breaking Strength after Accelerated Aging (Tensile) - Fed. Std. 191-5100* +5850 Not less than 757 of the initial breaking strength, after aging 48 hours at 212° to 221°F. 22. Mildew Resistance (Soil Burial) - Fed. Std. 191-5100* + 5762 Breaking strength shallnot he less than 757 of the strength before soil burial. 23. Oil Resistance (Mineral Oil) - CCC-A680A* Oil shall not permeate the coated fabric. *See Federal Standard CCC-A680A for test methods and modifi- cations. **Spirit of ' 76 and Exhibitor do not conform to the requirements of CCC-A680A which relate to Government Procurement such as inspections, packing, marking, AQL levels, sampling, delivery, etc. The requirements for physical properties listed above (except abrasion resistance and blocking) apply to the average of the test results from a sample. REV 5/14/86 EAM ` , NIROYAL PLASTICS COMPANY, INC. PCPS #49 PORT CLINTON PRODUCT SPECIFICATION 7/14/87 KRM C SPIRIT II AND NEOCHROME This specification covers SPIRIT II and NEOCHROME lines of upholstery NAUGAHYDA SPIRIT I.I,,.and NEOCHROME are designed to meet the physical property requirements of Federal Specification CCC-A-680a Class 2, treatments (a) 1 . regular fire resist- ance, (b)- mildew resistance and (c) oil resistance. A. Specific Requirements 13547L - 21347A - 1. Base Fabric - Jersey Knit Jersey Knit 2. Finished Width (inches) - 55±1 55±1 3. Weight (oz/yd2) - 24.8±1.5 24.8±1 .5 4. Gage (mils) - 50+5 50+5 -4 -4 5. Tensile-Grab (lbs.) initial (FS 191 - 5100) - 85 X 75 85 X 75 After Accelerated Aging and Soil Burial (FS 191 - 5762) - 75% of Initial 75% of Initial 6. Tear-Trap (lbs.) (FS 191 - 5136) - 20 X 20 20 X 20 7. Coating Adhesion (lbs/in.) - 3.0 X 3.0 3.0 X 3.0 (CS-273-65) 8. Stitch Tear (CS-273-65) - 25 X 20 25 X 20 9. Cold Resistance (FS 191 - 5874) - No cracking No cracking (-20°F) 10. Abrasion (FS 191 - 5304) - No wear through No wear through C (500 double rubs) to foam to foam 11. Stretch (CFFA-15) (% min.) - 5 X 25 5 X 25 12. Set (CFFA-15) (% max. ) - 25% of Stretch 25% of Stretch 13. Accelerated Weathering - No change in color, surface (FS 191 - 5804) (120 hrs.) qualities or stiffness. 14. Hydrostatic Resistance - 50 50 (FS 191 - 5512) (psi ) 15. Volatility (% max.) (48 hrs. - 10 10 @ 220°F) 16. Plasticizer Loss (% max.) - 10 10 (Activated carbon) 17. Flexing (CS-273-65) (15,000 cycles) - No separation of film to foam or foam to fabric. 18. Blocking (FS 191 - 5872) 3 max. 3 max. 19. Crocking (FS 191 - 5651 ) (AATCC) 4 Dry 4 Dry 3.5 Wet 3.5 Wet 20. Oil Resistance (4 hours) No permeation of coated cloth. 21. Flammability (FS 191 - 5903.2) a. After flame - seconds (max. ) - 2.0 2.0 b. Char length - inches (max. ) - 3.0 3.0 In addition to flammability requirements of CCC-A-680a, SPIRIT II and NEOCHROME meet the following small-scale tests: BIFMA, Ordinary Flammability California Bulletin 117 Boston Fire Department Test 11-2 C, 'r. 1 PCPS #49 (Cont'd.) C Commonwealth of Massachusetts 527 CMR 21.00 Port of New York Authority Federaf Aviation Agency, Airworthiness Standard 25.853(b) Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 302 UFAC, Class I B. General Requirements 1. Coating - The coatings shall be suitably plasticized and pigmented polyvinyl chloride resin or copolymers thereof. The foam layer shall incorporate a blowing agent and be expanded to the proper uniform gage. 2. Pliability & Surface Tack - Pliability and surface tack shall be equivalent to the approved standard sample and .shall be suitable for upholstered furnishings. C R. Messner Director of Laboratory PAINT @ GYP.BD. Surface Burning Characteristics of Pitt-Glaze Coatings The chart below is a point of quick quires that both a non-combustible refer- the performance numbers must be indexed reference for Pitt-Glaze coatings as they ence be utilized. Cement-asbestos board is to that reference substrate when evaluating relate to fire retardant properties and NFPA the neutral, non-flammable substrate used the system and its potential performance. ratings. However, it must be used ONLY as in the tests. Red Oak is the combustible This has been done for the listed flame quick reference. Full details of tests con- wood surface used in the tests listed here. spread values. ducted by Southwest Research Institute Thus when a coating system shows a low . The same reasoning must be applied to and Underwriters Laboratories Inc.0 are rating on the non-flammable substrate Acoustical Tile. available upon request and should be con. (cement-asbestos board rated 0, Class A, In order to secure the proper rating, all sulted if specific rating information is NFPA), that is the best indication of the factors must be considered as a whole — critical. Information is also available product's or system's ability to retard flame the product, the system and the substrate. through your local PPG servicing factory spread, develop smoke, or support com- The same system can exhibit both a Class A technical group. bustion. When the same system is applied and a Class B fire rating,depending on the The ASTM E-84 tunnel test is the basis of to a combustible substrate like Red Oak test substrate. all ratings shown.' This test method re- (with a control rating of 100,Class C-NFPA), COATING SYSTEMS TESTED tat COAT 2nd COAT FINISH Floe EL T EST' NFPA Sa.FI. Ft. S .FL Flre el Smoke Topcoat PPG U.S. PPG .S. PPG U.S. Sub Class n- Devel- Reference Code Gal. Coda Gal. Code Gal. shale Rating} ted aped Comments PPG Code Combustible Control Surface—Red Oak 0 100 Non-combustible Control Surface—Cement-Asbestos Board 0 0 1690 1590 150 CAB A0 0 - - 16L10116fi30 225 CAB A0 10 Class A Pitt Glaze Gloss Solvent Base Coating System for 16610115630 169 73 225 CAB A0 0 Concrete Block 15710116730 225 CAB A0 0 16710116730 16-9 73 225 CAB A0 0 'ASTM E-84 tunnel test."Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,"is identical to NFPA 255,NAS 2.5,UBC 42.1,and UL 723 tests. Project 3-3774-141 of the Southwest Research Institute,San Antonio,Texas 78284. Consult your Pittsburgh Paints Sales Representative for documentation letters if needed. Key to abbreviations: CAB = Cement-asbestos board NFPA = National Fire Protection Assoc. t Fire class ratings are based on the National Fire Protection Association(NFPA)101, Life Safety Code classifications as follows: A—0 to 25 flame spread B—26 to 75 flame spread C—76 to 200 flame spread D—201 to 500 flame spread E—in excess of 500 flame spread **At the present time only flame spread values are used to calculate NFPA Fire Class Ratings:Fuel Contribution and Smoke Development values are provided for Informational purposes only. NOTE:These numerical flame spread ratings are not Intended to reflect hazards presented by this or any other material under actual fire conditions. PPG Roller Covers for use with Pitt-Glaze Finish Coatings Surface Model No. Type Fiber Nap Length - Recommendations cover both the Solvent Base Polyester-epoxy and - { the Water Base Acrylic-epoxy types. , Roller covers used with Pitt-Glaze Polyester-epoxy or Acrylic-epoxy Coatings should be Smooth PLE Polyester 3116" considered expendable after the day's use. Semi-Rough Mark V Polyester 3l8" A Gold Stripe Mark V polyesterinylon brush is recommended for application of both solvent base Polyester-epoxy and water base Acrylic-epoxy types. Rough Mark V Polyester 112" Coverage Chart — Pitt-Glaze Coatings Polyester-epoxy and Acrylic-epoxy Pigmented High Solids Gloss and Semi-Gloss Speedhide Block Filler 6.7 Wet Film Dry Film Sq. Ft. per U.S.gal Wet Film Build Dry Film Build Sq. Ft.per Polyester-epoxy and 50 32.0 Mils 16.0 Mils U.S.gal. Acrylic-epoxy Polyester-epoxy Acrylic-epoxy 100 16.0 Mils 8.0 Mils 130 12 Mils 8 Mils 5.5 Mils 150 10.6 Mils - 5.3 Mils 175 9 Mils 6 Mils 4.1 Mils Pitt-Glaze Block Filler 16.90 265 6 Mils 4 Mils 2.8 Mils 525 3 Mils 2 Mils 1.4 Mils 50 32.0 Mils 16.0 Mils 75 21.3 Mils 10.7 Mils 100 16.0 Mils 8.0 Mils Pitt-Glaze Block Filler 16.85186 - - 40 40 Mils 23.0 Mils 60 26 Mils 15.0 Mils 80 20 Mils 12.0 Mlls PPG INDUSTRIES, INC./ONE PPG PLACE 1 PITTSBURGH, PA. 152721(412) 434.3131 In Canada:Coatings and Resins Division, PPG Industries Canada Ltd.,3730 Lakeshore Blvd. West,Toronto, Ont. M8W 1P3(416)259-4241 International Sales Representation through PPG Industries, Inc., International Sales Department, Pittsburgh, Pa. T rI -in7' 101133 AA - Printed in U.S.A. v� ALTERNATE Aqua-Tile PAINT @ GYP.BD. / q Water Base Epoxy ® AT 100 Series Description: AQUA-TILE is state of the art, waterbased epoxy enamel. It has properties which are equal to typical solvent based systems. Aqua-Tile's superior abrasion resistance, adhesion, flexibility, solvent and chemical resistance,combined with it being non-toxic,low odor,non-flamm- able and able to be coated over conventional finishes without lifting,provides the use of Aqua-Tile in areas where solvent systems are not feasible.Aqua- Tile is classified as a "Class A" fire rated coating. U.S.D.A. Authorization pending. _ Colors: White, Clear and Bases. Custom Blend over 1200 colors. (May be tinted with universal colorants) Finish: Gloss Vehicle Type: Epoxy/Amine Adduct Pigment Type: As required Solvent Type: Water Flash Point: N/A Solids by Volume: 41% Recommended Dry Film: 2.0 mils per coat. Coverage: Theoretical coverage at one mil dry is 658 square feet per gallon, 2 mils dry, 329 square feet per gallon. Material losses during mixing and application will vary and must be taken into consideration when estimating job require- ments. Viscosity at 75°F(24°C): 85-95 KU (mixed) k Average Dry Time at 75°F Aqua-Tile dries to touch in 1 hourand to handle in 2 hours.Recoat in 6 hours (24°C): and within 2 days. Full cure 96 hours. Recommended Thinner: No reduction should be necessary. However, if thinning is required, clean water may be added up to 15% by volume. Resistance TO: 5% Glacial Acetic Acid — No Effect 10% Nitric Acid — Slight Strain 10% Sulfuric Acid — No Effect 10% Hydrochloric Acid — Very Slight Stain 10% Sodium Hydroxide (24 hr. exposure) — No Effect Xylene — No Effect Isopropyl Alcohol — No Effect MEK — 100 Double Rubs — 6B Pencil Hardness De-Ionized Water (24 Hr. exposure) — No Effect Cleveland Humidity Resistance — No Effect (100 hours) Salt Spray Resistance — 100 hours — Very Fine Blister — @Scribe 1/16" creepage. Flexibility — Conical Mandrel 14' — Pass Direct Impact — 160 in/Ibs Reverse Impact — 160 in/lbs Adhesion (X-Hatch) — Excellent Pencil Hardness (1 week) — HB (Continued on next page) INSL-X PRODUCTS CORPORATION Main Office and Factory: 38 Wells Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10701 (914) 969-8000 Western Warehouse: 4225 Ross Avenue, Dallas TX 75206 (214) 824-8151 Cite of balem, IflaaacbUgettg Public Propertp Mepartment �pM/ry8 �3uilbing Department One Salem &teen 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer August 7, 1989 Mr. James F. Cooper Pizza Hut Inc. 27 Dublin Rd. Peabody, MA. 01960 RE: 105 Canal Street Dear Mr. Cooper: A building permit has been issued for you project at 105 Canal Street. Please be advised that the following shall be addressed as per our telephone conversation. 1. Dumpster location 2. Protection from ledge wall at rear of property 3. Seating plan If you are in need of any further assistance, you can contact me at this office. Sin ly, , Z David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector c.c. Leon Jelinek Interstate Construction 11 - 1-6 - 89 01 : 57PM QUEEN EXEC. / NORWELL, MP P02/02 STRUCTURES ENGINEERING, INC. 167A Washington Street • Norwell, Massachusetts 02061 (817) 878-0135 FAX (617) 878-0838 rs o "t c tr November 15, 1989 c� _ Mri Interstate Construction Management N -t 105 Canal Street co Salem, MA Attn: Mr. Wil Lassel Res Final structural Inspection Pizza Hut Salem, MA Jeer Mr. Lassel: on November 15, I conducted a final inspection of all Structural work on the above-referenced project. It appears that all structural work was done in accordance with the contract dawings and the approved revisions. Sincerely, o n P. ilewicz, P. JPG: J9 cc; Mr. Dave Harris Salem Building Department II SEI 11 13B r0 Pizza Hut, Inc. 1p 9111 East Douglas �� C � �� U S P loir,uL = �.} P.O. Box 428 FE02696 ` � 77o Wichita, Kansas 67201.0428 �— t ; f 0 .3 2 , ,- CITY OF SALEM �` C' BUILDING DEPARTMENT 04D 'L J City Hall Annex One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 QJ Y JR 'N � LAW DEPARTMENT PIZZA INC. p X3111 E. DOUGLAS P.O. BOX 783186 WICHITA, KS 67278.3186 CITY OF SALEM BUILDING LICENSE #1551 This is to certify Thal JASON S. YARDLEY 3016 E. EngliskSt. StR chita, es:., Has been granted a license by the Building Investor as e F SPECIALTY CONTRACTOR (Roofing) Attest: 2/14/96 (Issued) Building Impactor I JOB SITE C"OPY CITY OF SALEM BUILDING ft 2 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT DATE F EBRURRY :1.Q 19 96 PERMIT NO. 54"'-:1.''`:ifG APPLICANT TOM II ADDRESS (NO.) (STREET) (CONTE S LICENSE) CITY STATE ZIP CODE TEL NO. "'1 -7 8 E'NUMBER OF -], ,p"' PERMITTO PE--RODF I—) STORY RESTAUR- NIT DWELLING UNITS (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. - (PROPOSED USE) AT(LOCATION) 01015 {.:ANAL_ STRF F ET ZONING DISTRCT (NO.) (STREET) BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) - (CROSS STREET) MP) ' 0 132 LOT 0nZl2714 9 SO F'r SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE BUILDING ISTO BE FT.WIDE BV FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: P-r="RI I T TQ R1:-(X11(0F. J. Is� J. AREA ORCC r,3:'llll PERMIT ,'I/'I, 1210 VOLUME ESTIMATED COST.p , ' FEE (CUBIC/SQUARE FEET) OWNER M-313 REALTY TRUST BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS 9.r:' ".3A`1OY ROADBYJ. J. J THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY,ENCROACHMENTS 001. ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION,STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL INSPECTIONS APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS CARD KEPT WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WHERE A PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND 2,PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS 1 1 1 2 22 LPEUIIUNAPI`H0) PORTANT: An inspectio T is RlEk UIREI7 upon completion of work, p'sease call 745-9595 Ext. 85 BOARD OF HEALTH VA RE-DE C TING APPROVALS 1 1 OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 2 WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION AS NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION. d Hut ®® Pizza Hut, Inc./584 Middletown Blvd./Bldg,A/Langhorne, PA 19047/Phone(215)752-9600/Telex(215)752-8843 C-4 3V C:) L November 160 1989 �j ccs x nry W = G O David J. Harris Assistant Building InspectorCn G - One Salem Green co Salem, MA Re:Pizza Hut, 105 Canal ST. Dear Mr. Harris, With respect to all documentation submitted to me, and to the best of my knowledge, the above restaurant has been built in accordance with submitted plans and meet all state and local code requirements. Sincerely, 1 James F. Cooper INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED 1113 CLEVELAND AVE. • LOVELAND • COLORADO • 60637• [3031663-0660• FAX: [3036;63-b979 C7 � x � o T n -1 ; November 8, 198 v cn co cn c� City of Salem Building Inspector Salem, MA Re: Pizza Hut 105 Canal Street Salem, MA Dear Sir: I.C.M. has completed the above referenced project as shown in the issued blueprints and per Massachusett's code. Please feel free to contact us if you should have any questions. Sincerely, INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION MA EMENT INCORPORATED a o is esident /ss CERTIFICATE ISSUED CITY OF SALEM DATE 10/5/94 s SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 BUILDING: PERMIT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY -' DATE- August 22 19 94 PERMIT NO. 381-94 APPLICANT n DeAmgelo Inc. ADDRESS 321 Manley St:. k.Bridgewatez, Masa -INC.) ISTREETI (CONIR'S LICENSE) PERMIT TO ;A7terations1_1 STORY Reet'$raunL NUMBERNG UNITS C" '(IvPE OF IMPROVEMENTI N0.' -+I PROPOSFO OSE) AT�iLOCAT IOM', x105 Canal Straet Ward25 _ ZONING ' IRV.I (STREET/ DISTRICT IT ti BEEWEEN4 •- ,AND - ` ❑ 1 t OL (CROSS BT.EE'T; (CROSS STREET)LOT : SU B-D'i V ISION LOT BLOCK-SIZE ' a. f _ _ BUILDING IS TO BE FT. WIDE P FT LONG BY 'FT IN HEIGHT AND SMALL CONFORM IN CONSTPUCT'ION TO TYPE - f�� USE GROUP - , BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION , f ,�O :.':Ol''. r/. /: t3 • 3 ...i . - ITYPE• }' ermi `t ''to renovate piz-g- shop-w/ mesa psumbin .REMARKS. `"�. S b '.eleCtLiCal r AREA OR ... j VOLUME '- C ;BICSOVtAE,FEET( WigIN mill Is OWNER �efiv�fl Piasa Rut Inc.IIIc. serloi Tlo�e.nornoN lsrn sS Elo�N RFC,NRF,Noans�stnp TO BE POSTED ON PREMISES ADDRESS, 321 Manley St. Bridgewater, its SEg'dWERA Sjf§IKj9 AgWITIONS OF CERTIFECATE DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE of OCCUPANCY and COMPLIANCE Totbe filled in by each division indicated hereon uponcompletion !of its final inspection. BUILDINGS Permit No. 381-94 Approved by John;Jenuing's i Date 9/28/94 Remarks PLUMBING Permit No. Approved by JohnLeClerc' Dale 9/28194 Remarks I ELECTRICAL i Permit No. l Approved by Al 'Falkovski Date 9/27/94 i ` y rsy �1 i Remarks � OTHER Fire ' Permit No. , .,it Wm. son Hud9/28/94 Approved by_ Date ti sii, Remarks OTHER Permit ryo. q Approved by Date �I t finis" N Remarks - I I , BUILDING 6 PERMIT JOB WEATHER CARD GATE AuguGC 32 19 94 PERMIT NO. 381_94 APPLICANT UrF�k.C.i Inc. ADDRESS 3i.1 haill19t- St. 4.brldseunte rl. KA_gS (NO.) (STREET) ICONTR'S LICENSE' plC$CdLYOflF NUMBER OF PERMIT TO (_I STORY kmtarsun: OWE LING UNITS (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTI NO. (PROPOSED USE) AT (LOCATION) L>� Lrh:�"i.� Straist {dirft ZONING DSTR " (NO.) (STREET) IICT BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SO E BUILDING IS TO BE FT. WIDE BY FT. LONG BY FT. IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION REMARKS: (TYPE) Permit to renovate piss" shop w/ now plusIbing 6 aie.,srienl AREA OR VOLUME Call for Permit to O.�ccupy. ESTIMATED COST $p 45,00 PERMIT S rI :CUBIC/SQUARE FEET) OWNER Pizza Efut Inc. �NG ADDRESS321 baauley Lt. tbridgayater, masa 9YIL .90EIIO, JT. JB}L21nAs THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET, ALLEY 09 SIDEWALK OR ANY P4RT THEREOF. EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PPERMANENTLY. ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE, MUST BE AP. IP PROVED BY THE JURISDICTION. STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL gPPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FAR CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN PF RMIT5 ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND I. FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. MADE. WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS RE. MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL OUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALLNOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL MINAL INSPECTION N PE TI TO LATHE FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3. FINAL INS PE.0 TION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS �L 2 �' z BOARD OF MEAL, GAS INSPECTION APPROVALS FIRE DEPT.INSPECTING APPROVALS CW 1cm,01 4a A�Po a 6 IurPcre't a a -9 OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 '� Z �G WORK SHALL NOT PI{OCEED UNTIL THE PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARO INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT IS ISSUED AS NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION. City of Salem, Massachusetts f -ire Department 48 Lafayette Street David Cody Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 Fire Prevention Chief Tel 978-744-1235 Bureau 978-744-6990 Fax 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 dcody@salem.com June 2, 2006 Nicholas M. Ambeliotis 27 Lowell Street Peabody MA 01960-5489 RE: D&N fast food, Inc d/b/a Sidelines Restaurant 105 Canal Street Salem MA 01970 Dear Mr. Ambehotis, After consulting with the Fire Prevention Division, Sidelines Restaurant was not issued an order to install sprinklers. The restaurant was included in the initial group of occupancies we had looked at due to the buildings occupancy load. It was determined that this establishment did not fit the description provided in Chapter 304 relating to the installation of automatic sprinklers. I am sorry for the confusion in this matter and apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Sinc ely, David W. Cody Chief of Department Cc: Lt. Griffin Thomas St. Pierre 1 GULF OF MAINE ' RESEARCH CENTER INC. M.G.L. CHAPTER 21E ' SITE ASSESSMENT FOR: Don Berubes Pre-Owned Auto Sales Lot 132 ' 105 Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts 1 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES >O 1 1 ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES ' 204 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 December 13 , 1988 (508) 745-6618 FAX (508) 741-8648 ' Mr. and Mrs . Donald J . Michaud C/O Attorney Chris Drucas One Church Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Site Assessment Relative to Chapter 21E 105 Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. and Mrs. Michaud: ' The Gulf of Maine Research Center Inc . of Salem, Massachusetts is pleased to submit this Site Assessment Summary relative to the current provisions of Massachusetts General Law (M. G.L. ) Chapter 21E ' and all implementing regulations under said law for the property located at 105 Canal Street in Salem, Massachusetts, hereinafter ' referred to as the "Site" . The purpose of this investigation was to review the uses 1 presently associated with the Site and, to the extent ascertainable ' by inquiry in the Site Assessment Summary, the uses previously associated with the Site to determine whether or not oil or thazardous material is being or has been released at the Site as defined under M.G.L. Chapter 21E. The investigation of the Site was conducted in November, 1988 , ' and the potential for the generation, use, treatment, storage and disposal of oil or hazardous material at the Site was considered. ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. The investigation included observations from the November 11 , 1988 , ' Site visit , a description of the property, information obtained from local and state officials and a subsurface boring and soil and ' ground water testing program. ' Based upon the visual site investigation, review of local and state records , installation of ground water monitor wells, ' screening, sampling, and analyses of ground water and soils for selected priority pollutant compounds, evidence exists that petroleum hydrocarbons and other contaminants are being or have been released on the Site. ' The le iels of cent aminants-found_on the Site are not exceedingly, .._ ' Thigh and-_the _sampling_conducted. to date does not indicate the._ presence .of_a .specific .source.- It is possible that previous usage ' of the Site for auto sales and servicing may have contributed to an overall low level soil and groundwater degradation. As the Site s' 1 not associated with .any sensitive receptors it is -our- opinion `thae' ' (the conditions' do not pose an imminent threat to public health;~ ((safety, welfare_or _ to the environment`, However , subsequent ' construction activities may reveal localized areas of hydrocarbon or metal contaminatio and excavated soils may require special (handling.,—testing, and disposal.' Should you have any questions in regard to this matter please feel free to contact either me or my assistant, William Betters . tSincerely, AV4 Hugh F. Mulligan, Ph.D. Director ' HFM/gg 1 Report on Site Evaluation of ' Don Berubes Pre-Owned Auto Sales 105 Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts For Compliance with M.G.L. c.21E ' Prepared For: Mr. and Mrs. Donald J. Michaud c/o Attorney Chris Drucas ' One Church Street Salem, Massachusetts 1 By: Hugh F. Mulligan, Ph.D. Director December 13, 1988 ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES ' 204 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 (508) 745-6618 FAX 508-741-8648 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ' Table of Contents Report on Site Evaluation of property at Don Berubes Pre-Owned Auto Sales ' 105 Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts for Compliance with M.G.L. c. 21E Page 1 ' Soil Boring Logs . Appendix A r Laboratory Results Appendix B ■' Summary of .Qualifications Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. ' 204 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Appendix C t 1 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. INTRODUCTION This Site Assessment. Summary has been prepared to present the ' results of an investigation to determine whether or not oil or hazardous material is being or has been released on a parcel of property in Salem, Massachusetts located at 105 Canal Street and known as Don Berubes Pre-Owned Auto Sales , hereinafter referred to as the "Site" . The report includes observations from a site visit , a subsurface testing program, a physical description of the Site and surrounding properties , information obtained from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) , Salem Health and Safety officials and, an assessment, based on this 1 investigation, of whether or not oil or hazardous material is being ' or has been released at the Site relative to M.G.L. Chapter 21E. ' SITE LOCATION The Site is situated on the east side of Canal Street at the ' intersection with St . Paul Street within a commercial area of ' metropolitan Salem. Figure 1 depicts the location of the Site. Canal Street is a heavily travelled, two lane road which allows ' access to numerous businesses and Salem State College Athletic Facilities and serves as a connector route between downtown Salem ' and Route 1A. SITE DESCRIPTION ' The Site consists of approximat y 2 , 714 quare feet of property and is depicted as lot number 132 of the assessors map (Figure 2 ) . ' The majority of the Site is occupied by a one-story, wood framed, 1 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. office building which is currently occupied by Don Berube ' s Pre-Owned Auto Sales. The Site bounds are delineated by a chain link. fence . ABUTTING CONDITIONS The Site is located within a commercial area of Salem. Canal ' Street abuts the Site to the west; a used car lot ( Lot 131 ; Figure ' 2 ) and residential properties ( Lots 128 , 129 , 130 ; Figure 2 ) abut the property to the north. Opposite Canal Street from the site is Hawthorne Animal Hospital and Salem Ice Center at 1.20 Canal Street I and Salem Rental. Immediately east of the Site and upgradient- are ' residential properties. To the south, the Site is abutted by ' Northshore Glass ( Lot 133 ; Figure 2 ) . UTILITIES The Site is serviced by municipal water and sewer which are ' supplied underground, beneath Canal Street. Electricity and ' telephone service are provided via overhead lines. The Site vicinity is also serviced by natural gas. TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The Site is located within the North Coastal Drainage Basin. No surface water bodies are associated with the Site. Site topography has been altered by urban development and decreases in elevation tfrom east to west. The Site is situated at an approximate elevation of 10 feet NGVD. Regionally, the topography rises sharply to the ' east. GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. RESEARCH ' Research was conducted with the Massachusetts Department of ' Environmental Quality Engineering ( DEQE) and Salem LBoard"of-Health and F re9Dep' partme t files on oil and hazardous wastes. j-No-reports� ' or complaints-werew,on�f 'leirelative to the Site. ' SITE HISTORY ' An atlas of the Cityj or 1884^depicts` the Site and vicinityyas; Mil Pond and open land owned by Almy, wiggen & Clark. The 1911 City Atlas shows the Site and vicinity as. Mill Pond and a residence owned by J. B. Martin. At this time, the land in the vicinity was ' subdivided into lots . Properties along Roslyn Street are shown as mainly residential use. -Bv,1925 , Mi-11--Pond had- been-fi7 properties were subdivided and a building was depicted on-Site; no ' owner was listed. No records were available from the City of Salem Building Department regarding the age of the Site-building. 1 ' SITE EVALUATION Gulf of Maine Research Center conducted a general visual ' reconnaissance of. the Site and its vicinity on November 11 , 1987 . A visual inspection of the Site exterior revealed a one-story, wood ' framed building which is currently occupied by Don Berube' s Pre-Owned Auto Sales . The Site-building is set back approximately 12 to 15 feet from Canal Street. The portion of the Site that fronts on Canal Street is paved and is currently utilized for the storage of autos. The remainder of the Site to the rear (west) of the Site-building is unpaved. This area appears to have been ' occupied by stored vehicles. Minor surficial ground-staining_was .. 'obs_e_r-ved n this unpaved portion of the Site. GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ' On November 11 , 1988 , GMRC contracted with Down to Earth ' Drilling, Inc . to conduct two subsurface test borings at the Site and two borings on an adjacent property. Test borings were ' conducted utilizing 9 . 5 inch hollow stem augers . Split spoon samples were taken at 5 foot intervals utilizing the standard ' penetration method. ' Subsurface materials encountered were comprised of medium dense, dry, fine to medium sand and gravel with variable amounts of coarse gravel, cobbles and inorganic silt fill material. - This granular fill material overlies loose to medium dense, wet, fine sand and ' inorganic silt with some clay. ' Test borings were completed for installation of ground water monitor well installation purposes and were not intended for specific geotechnical information. Test boring logs prepared by Down to Earth Drilling are appended and the locations are shown on ' Figure 3 - Field Sketch. ' GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSES ' Upon completion of each test boring, ground water monitor wells were installed. Ground water monitor wells installed at the Site ' are comprised of 10 foot sections of slotted PVC screens which were ' set to intercept the ground water table. Silica sand filter packs were emplaced around the screens and solid PVC risers were extended to the ground surface. A two foot thick bentonite seal was placed above the screens . Each monitor well was protected by a roadway box ' which was cemented at a slightly higher elevation than the surrounding ground surface. 4 ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. Each ground water monitor well was purged with a clean dedicated ' bailer and allowed to recharge prior to sampling. Ground water ' samples were placed in laboratory prepared containers for analysis of volatile organics ( EPA 524 ) , dissolved 8 RCRA Metals and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Oil and Grease (TPH-OG ) (EPA Method 503 B&E ) SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSES Soils which were collected at 5 foot intervals during the subsurface test boring program were screened in the field utilizing a portable H•Nu photoionization detector calibrated-to- benzene. The H•Nu instrument provides a field screen for volatile compounds which ' are comparable to benzene. Woollatt 'le vapor concentrations—in soils ' "from the Site were determined by the Jar Headspace Analyses Method. A glass jar was partially filled with soil, covered with aluminum ' foil then capped and tightly sealed. The jar was then agitated and allowed to equilibriate for approximately 15 minutes at ambient ' temperatures . Refer to Attachment A for the complete Jar Headspace Analyses protocol. The H•Nu probe was then inserted through the foil to measure vapor concentration. No volatile organic vapors were detected in the field screening above levels which are considered to be background. ' Soil from each test boring was composited into laboratory prepared containers for state certified analyses by New England ChromaChem for Acid Base/Neutral Extractables ( EPA Method 8270 ) and ' Pesticide/PCB ( EPA Method 8080 ) analyses . 5 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ANALYTICAL RESULTS ON SOIL ' The laboratory report prepared by New England ChromaChem indicates that no Acid Base/Neutral Extractables nor PCB compounds were detected in the composite soil sample collected at the Site. ' The-composite soil- sample-was reported _to contain 1470 parts -' �. � per, (million.-( PPM)-of. petroleum hydrocarbons - 'IThe analytical results for the soil testing have been appended and are summarized on Table A. ANALYTICAL RESULTS ON GROUND WATER The analytical reported prepared by New England ChromaChem v- indicated that no volatile organic constituents were detected in the ' ground water from the Site. Dissolved concentrations of several of ' the 8 RCRA metals were present in the ground water sample above the levels acceptable for use as drinking water. Specifically, cadmium, ' lead and selenium are present at levels which exceed current established EPA drinking water standards . ' The analytical report prepared by Water Control Lab indicates that the ground water sample from MW-1 contained 4 . 1 (ppm)of TPH-OG 1 constituents . The ground water sample from MW-2 was reported to contain 5 . 4 ppm. Analytical results for ground water testing have been summarized on Table B and the report is appended. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION tBased upon a visual assessment of the Site, a subsurface test ' boring program, sampling of soil for volatile organics ( EPA 524 ) , 8 Dissolved RCRA metals , Acid Base/Neutral Extractables , PCB, and ' Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, and ground water for volatile organics 6 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1 and dissolved metals , research with state and local officials , physical evidence exists that oil or hazardous waste is being or has been released at the Site in the form of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil. Petroleum hydrocarbons are also present in the ground water, at 4 . 1 and 5. 4 mg/1. These levels may be derived from the storing and servicing of automobiles on the Site or they could be the result of ' previous unrecorded usages. Cadmium, lead and selenium are also present in the ground water at levels which exceed drinking water standards. Although_the_levels are not exceedingly high,and_in_-our (opinion do�not pose an imminent threat to public health safety,. Welfare-or to the environmental,~ their presence may constitute quantity reportable_.to_the-Massachusetts-Department_of Environmental Qualicy� Engineering (DEQE) as defined_in_310CMR_s.40. Remediall _M - measures _which .could_be prescribed by DEQE. include some soil- removal and_covering_with asptialt.j It should be noted that the sampling ' conducted is indicative of conditions at these specific locations . ' Therefore , any excavation of soil on the Site may require •furtherh testing a7ncf possible special handling if. it,.is .shown 'to-or-expectedf CTo_have,significant levels of. hydrocarbon-or -metal contamination�� This Report is intended for use by the party (parties ) identified on the title page and with whom the Gulf of Maine Research Center Inc. is under contractual agreement. Any reproduction, distribution, sale or transfer of this Report or any ' part of the Report is unauthorized unless prior written consent is granted by Gulf of Maine. However, Gulf of Maine acknowledges and ' agrees that the Report may be conveyed to the Buyer, Lender, and ' Title Insurer associated with the proximate sale of the Site by our Client. GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. The conclusions set forth in this Report are based on generally ' accepted technical practices . These conclusions are based solely on ' the visual , historical and/or physical information collected by Gulf of Maine which is contained within this Report. Any additional ' information which may become available to Gulf of Maine subsequent to this report may require said conclusions to be modified. No ' other warranties , expressed or implied are made . 1 1 t 8 1 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. Table A Summary of Laboratory Results for Soil Samples Collected at 105 Canal Street ' Salem, Massachusetts Samples Collected 11/11/88 ' Sample I .D. No. 811112 and 811114 ' Type Soil Composite Location MW-1 and MW-2 PARAMETERS ' Acid Base/Neutral Extractables ND ( EPA 8270 ppb) PCBs ND ( EPA 624 ) ' Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 1 , 470 ( ppm) ' Note: ppb = parts per billion ' ppm = parts per billion NT = not tested ND = not detected above minimum laboratory detectable limit ' Laboratory results reported by New England ChromaChem ' The laboratory report has been appended. 1 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1 Table B Summary of Laboratory Results for Ground water Samples Collected at 105 Canal Street Salem, Massachusetts Samples Collected 11/14%88 1 Sample I .D. No. 811117 ' Type ground water composite Drinking AS-2W1 AS2W2 Water Standards Location MW-1 and MW-2 PARAMETERS ' Volatile Organics ( EPA 524 in ppb) ND ' Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Oil and Grease ' ( EPA 503 in ppm) 4 . 1 5 . 4 8 Dissolved RCRA Metals (ppm) Arsenic <0 . 001 . 05 ' Barium <1 . 00 1 . 0 Cadmium 0 . 023 . 01 Chromium 0 . 03 . 05 ' Lead 0 . 19 . 05 Mercury <0 . 002 . 002 ' Selenium 0 . 539 . 01 Silver 0 . 015 . 05 1 Note: ' ppb = parts per billion ppm = parts per billion NT = not tested ND = not detected above ' minimum laboratory detectable limit Laboratory results reported by New England ChromaChem 1 .ICCC /l1� O / NN ,`tel � t , l - ��_. t) r A I IJnI ' q A. HIfJ I IM �Sd < (" .I Gnu i'o T r `- - n o-• 1 uCA ARR01 <,.. t ` ��t �h 1t� •,r.siFi, /��}J� �� Sd 11 � 1 kY �(::: ,(O$/� T~ TWaI� 'aj �J`0 aW1, wOp�. • _ _-44 ' stole'I 5' 9 a '�'� d'• '� ) �t. r .. �� r' 0 ID LAd B F�CCIn / 6M Pd 4 'M"', y 1 M A • �(• Y&h f �j pJdl `\- FCIYI ♦.regi ;,PIM sr' I . - w if 'Tap ,��1. A� i ice'/�♦ jHdll '4wum 4�IMp, Mani se.Glx✓-" ar�ia_,en p —t ) I 1 ♦gs. T+pl Nsty,ro sqe Aiy } 'I �. f 11. /•j h� FMe �/T1 �17��} ` \ we0 s � Wnml j'' ��aaa PQ•" A.l..!, ].d 1 `' 31 .�' /10 /^' c��h� t 'A H I 1 `•w � � 1- � S.twoewil \`{ Long Pt Adnu'r ml S Orta ' 4} \o I\ ♦ !,Host la'.i i, L� Iocl :. s _.___ _ `...... T +•l pND' W J4x. `y w �.v M1Z c jC.ro! IG u f I. .7 ori' `♦ - I rf` w ca r x C en g W r � o- Pt . �lAl f M srart fa,i Cee Dif rIL Np PAkK [T \ `` _� P ♦ �` r: 8"e tFIGURE 1 : Site Location 105 Canal Street Salem, MA SCALE: 1 : 25 000 ' SOURCE: USGS Salem Quadrangle RSLY N^• „ �o too p7 �' 30 139 0 0� 123 •0 1 so N ' 2zr u�1a 143 ❑ 140 {- . i ao e16 141 �; 4,c � 120A - 29 4500 13L3 VA I ,iii 2645 >s0 ' 144 J�>5 5" 49- 14Z 495 - 9a 142 I��I .�2.5 119 _ ^2 � 1 a 135 13G t,.. LzJ 126 6ti� 70 an r .5-546 (p 74 467-5 t 4 J4j �8.441N 134 _s 97-5 !Z .5,Z • 1 w IV 4,600 m � 'PAUI. ST. � , T 128 117 5 r uz , 129 ` 7co0 � 400 �3 ' O X� 4,c4� 116 - 3073 131 5.870 a240 ..::,s.. •: 10127 ti "- 27140 `. 41601; 114 b'40 113 r 133 112 P _ �INt J 30654 i I x900 _ 110 " 1 � 473 O � • o P r _ 105 z500 " 2.11 AC lC)g 1 - 106 2860 ^ ' e N s,r- F4 _ 104 43 to L L 7 50 tFIGURE 2 : Assessors Plan 105 Canal Street Salem, MA SCALE: 1" = 100 ' ' SOURCE: City of Salem Assessors Plan ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ' References Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) , Northeast Regional Office , File Search, October , 1988 . ' Salem Board of Health, Robert Blankhorn ( 508 741-1800 ) , Personal Communication, November , 1988 . Salem Fire Department , Request for File Search, . dated_ November, 1988 . ' Salem Engineering Department, File Search, November, 1988 . ' Salem Building Department, File Search, November , 1988 . 1 1 1 1 t GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1 1 ' APPENDIX A Soil Boring Logs r ' DOWN TO EARTH MISS, GCRRVWHITMAN DRILLING INC. tVNGSBORRo. O. A0 aes B of 2" 79 Gera GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. mate 11/11/88 }ob No. ' Location 111 CANAL ST. SALEM,MA. BORING AS-1 Ground Dale 11/11/88 Date 11/11/88 Drd^g J.G. Eng-Hydroi. SUE N0. Etev. Sun Cemplele Foreman Geofopisl — — Sample Data Soil andlor bedrock strata descriptions P sample Blows Rec Casing Strata T No Depth(tl.) V Peneualon IncMs Bows Ch" Visual Identitinlion o1 Soil arWbr RoNc Strata N Par h. Depth 10' 011 Med . dense,dry , fine to coarse sand and gravel , trace cobbles and inorga- q , nic silt . 5 q ' Loose to med . dense ,wet , fine sand and inorganic silt ,plus some clay . 1 ' 161. �„ 10 — End of boring 11 ' 6" Water 8 ' upon completion . Monitor well point 10 ' ' 15 Bentonite seal 2 ' -1 ' 6" ) 30 35 so Type N Boriry HSA Gsmp Site /kdore SMa Alear Stas 414 Otho: Proportion Percentages Gwmrer Soft plan W U tohsstw Sot(Naw Per y Trace 0 to 10% O to 1 Wry Loose 30 to 50 Demes O to 2 Very Sot 110 1s SON Some 10 to 10% a to t0 Loose Ow 50 Wry Dents 2 b 1 Soft 15 b 30 Wry Sill ' And 10 W 50% t0 to 30 Mirdl Deme 4 to 8 Medium Still Own 30 Nerd Standard penetration last(SP1) . 1101 hr+ewsr hlMg 30' Blows are per t'talent with anZy'long : r am a 131E'LQ a*spoon samga u iss egwwlss spied. ' The terms and pelcen ages used to describe soil and of rock en based on visual Identification of the rebiesed samples.■Mdsturs mately ktdcated meybe Matted by tame d year and water added durn2 the dii4ng process.B Willer Mels ndiWed mty very with national Nuctuation and dr dsgns of ad selunlion when the toting was taken. 6 The sualdical on Mes nepitsent ft Approsnute bouden"bill ere ed tos ,the acbaal bans""be gradur.8 ' DOWN TO EARTH !fftg GCRRY WHITMAN DRILLING INC. A01879 ' TMNcseoRo. MA 01 0 BOX sa �` , G,e,n GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC . orae 11/11 ,top No. ' :ocalion 105 CANAT, 21. SALEM,MA. BORING AS —2 Ground Dare 11/11/88 Dere 1 1 1 1 8 8primp J .G. EngMydrd_SUE D. N0. Elev. Sun Complete =1n Geologist ' — — Sample Dau Soil and/or bedrock s1.7u descdpdom P Sam a Blows Rec. Casing Shan HNo Oeplh(h.) 6" Peneualan Inches s Change Yrsual Idere cation d Soil andbr flock Strata ' 1 0"-1 ' 6' 2-5-8 Depth Med . dense , dry, fine to coarse sand and gravel , trace cobbles , inorganic 6 ' silt. ' S 51 -616, 11- - 6 ' Loose ,wet , fine sand ,plus some inorg- anic silt and clay . 9 ' ' 9' Soft ,wet , inorganic silt and clay. 61, 1p 11 ' 11 ' 6" End of boring 11 ' 6" Water 81upon completion . ' 15 Monitor well point 10 ' ' 25 30 1 3S 1 1 40 ' Typed Boring HSA Asmp Sian Sem higiser Stm 414 Other. Proportbn Percentages Gearaft Sok)blow Per 1L) Cohesive sot4 lam Par 94 Trace 0 to 104 0 W 4%Yry Laaee 3D to SO Dena 0 to 2 Wry Sob I to 15 Soh Some 10 b 4D% 4 b 10 Laoas Own 50 Mary Dina 2 to 4 Soh 15 all 30 Mary 5011 Md 40 W SO% 10 to 20 Msdusu Dorm 1 b B Medium SUM Over 30 hard Standard penstratoon Isol(SPO) . 1101 brwnw bbV 0D' Blows are par 6'Wan with an�q'tong a Y QD Is 12/6'LD spit spoon sampler unless aim--W awed. ' The arms and percentages used to descreA soil and of rode am teased on visual ideWica6ar d do nbiawd samples.■Moisture corded i4oatedanybe decbd by time d yew and water sdded during the diking process.■Water teveb indicated may wry with seasonal 6udualion and the degree of sA seturaiwn when the boring was taken. 8 The slrsldication foes represeN Na Apprmrinute boundaries hreen said types.gn&&W transitions a"be grad d.6 ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1 APPENDIX B ' Laboratory Results 1 1 WATER CONTROL LABORATORIES A DIVISION OF.COOPERATING MANAGEMENT INC. 63373674 000542 1 HOPKINTON INDUSTRIAL PARK 106 SOU"I I-I Sl. , HOPKINTON. MA01748 g 08860102 (AS2W1 ) 503-435,6'K'4 IEFERRED BY 1 GULF 01' MAINE RESEARCH imam am= gc= ' AT'TN : BILL BETTERS 12/02/88 12/02/86 12/05/88 204 LAFAYETTE 00 : 00 17 : 21 17 : 01 SALEM, MA 01970 FINAL REPORT MALLUMMqq Dun ** GENERAL INFORMATION ( COLLECTOR: GULFiOF MAINE RSCH ) I** ORGANIC TESTING PET HYDROCARBON (IR) 14 . 1 MG/L j ! **� THIS IS A FINAL REPORT. *** ■ I I i i1 i I 1 1 i I I 1 I I � I it I I it j `I - - ---- ----- - - M:w}� Ll'h Na 113 Nn PH 0 LP<111 NU MPI)'. VVA 1 LH CON I HOL LABORATOHIES ;e� 1 A DIVISION OF COOPERATING MANAGEMENT INC. 83373675 000542 1 HOPKINTON INDUSTRIAL PARK 106 SOUTH ST 1 HOPKINTON, MAO 17,18 508-435-6824 # 088 (60102 • AS2W2 ) tf-FERRED BY: GULF OF MAINE: RESEARCH ammm 1 ATTN : BILL BETTERS 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/05/88 204 LAFAYETTE 00 : 00 17 : 25 17 : 01 SALEM, MA 01970 FINAL REPORT ** GENERAL INFORMATION j ( COLLECTOR : GULF ; OF MAINE RSCH TITLE : ) I I** ORGANIC TESTING PET HYDROCARBON (I12) j5 , 4 MG/L � _ ** THIS IS A FINAL REPORT. *** i I i 1 i i i i i 1 � 1 � 1 .—I CUrI N7 11 3 1 Nn I'll WO_i . !of 11)No .111 ' NEW ENGLAND CHROMACHEM ' 6 NICHOLS STREET FAWDKUW SALEM, MA 01970 ppgap� 508-744-6600 F IRONMF.NTAL Un XI: ANO ANALYSIS 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 ' CLIENT: GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH 508-7446600 ' SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/11/88 SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/11/88 NEC CLIENT PARAMETER ' ID# ID PET HC MG/KG WET WT. ' 811112 CANAL STREET CSS-1S11470• ---------------------------------------------------------------- ' 811113-- CANAL STREET CSS-1S2 94 ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- THESE ARE SOIL SAMPLES ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 M. D. L. = 1 MG/KG WET WT. - ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 44 �1 ' 11/14/88 BRUCE A. BORNSTEIN DATE LABORATORY DIRECTOR ' NEW ENGLAND CHROMACHEM 6 NICHOLS STREET ' SALEM, MA 01970 WWDIGUM 508-744-6600 OWAMACNN ICWIRONNRNTAL TENTING EPA 8270 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES A",ANALYSIS CLIENT: GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH SAMPLE ID: NEC # 81 1 1 14 6 Nichols Street CLIENT ID: CANAL STREET SALEM CSS-1S3 SOIL SAMPLE Salem, MA 01970 ' SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/11/88 508744-0600 SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/14/88 ' PARAMETER RESULTS (UG/KG WET WT. ) ACENAPHTHENE ND ACENAPHTHYLENE ND ANTHRACENE ND ALDRIN ND BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE ND BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE ND ' BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE ND BENZO(A)PYTRNR ND BENZO(GHI )PERYLENE ND BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE = ND B-BHC ' - ND D-BHC ND BIS ( 2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER ND BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE ND BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE ND BIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER ND ' 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER ND CHLORDANE ND 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE ND 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER ND CHYSENE ND 4, 4' -DDD ND 4, 4' -DDE ND 4, 4' -DDT ND DIBENZO(A, H)ANTHRACENE ND DI -N-BUTYLPHTHALATE ND ' 1, 3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 1, 2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 1, 4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ' 3, 3' -DICHLOROBENZIDINE ND DIELDRIN ND DIETHYL PHTHALATE ND DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ND 2, 4-DINITROTOLUENE ND 2, 6-DINITROTOLUENE ND DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE ND ENDOSULFAN SULFATE ND ENDRIN ALDEHYDE ND FLUOANTHENE ND FLUORENE ND HEPTACHLOR ND HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE ND HEXACHLOROBENZENE ND ' HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND *CONTINUED ON PAGE 2* EPA 625 BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES con' t. lkypxmumw TFIMNG ANN ANALMS 6 Nichols Street HEXACHLOROETHANE Salem, MA 01970 ND INDENO( 1, 2, 3-CD) PYRENE ND 508-744-6600 ISOPHORONE ND NAPHTHALENE ND ' NITROBENZENE ND N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE ND PCB-1016 ND ' PCB-1221 ND PCB-1232 ND PCB-1242 ND ' PCB-1248 ND PCB-1254 ND PCB-1260 ND PHENANTHRENE ND PYRENE ND TOXAPHENE ND 1, 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ' INTERNAL STANDARDS ' ANILINE-DS 98 1-FLUORONAPHTHYLENE 94 PYRIDINE-D5 102 METHOD DETECTION LIMIT = 1 UG/KG WET WT. 1 1 c'- . 1 t 11/14/88 BRUCE A. BORNSTEIN ' DATE LABORATORY DIRECTOR NEW ENGLAND CHROMACHEM 6 NICHOLS STREET SALEM, MA 01970 NEyOMMM ' 508-744-6600 W IRONNRNTAL TF NG EPA 8270 ACID EXTRACTABLES ANDANALWS ' CLIENT: GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH SAMPLE ID: NEC # 811 114 6 Nichols Street CLIENT ID: CANAL STREET SALEM CSS-1S3 SOIL SAMPLE Salem,MA 01970 ' SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/11/88 SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/14/88 508-744-6600 PARAMETER RESULTS (UG/KG WET WT. ) ' 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL ND 2-CHLOROPHENOL ND 2, 4-DICHLOROPHENOL ND ' 2, 4-DIMETHYLPHENOL ND 2, 4-DINTROPHENOL ND ' 2-METHYL-4, 6-DINITROPHENOL ND 2-NITROPHENOL ND 4-NITROPHENOL ND ' PENTACHLOROPHENOL ND PHENOL ND 2, 4, 6-TRICHLOROPHENOL ND ' INTERNAL STANDARDS % 2-FLUOROPHENOL 105 PHENOL-D5 97 2-PERFLUOROMETHYL PHENOL 96 METHOD DETECTION LIMIT = 1 UG/KG WET WT. 1 ct 11/14/88 BRUCE A. BORNSTEIIIN ' DATE LABORATORY DIRECTOR New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street ' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 MWEVGUM (508) 744-6600 ENVIRONNRNTAL Tt';T'ING ANU ANA LT619 - 'EPA 524. 2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN WATER CLIENT: GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH 6 Nichols Street -"N. E. C. ID # 811117 Salem,MA 01970 LIENT ID: 105-111 CANAL STREET SALEM AS-1W1 COMPOSITE WATER SAMPLE 508744{6600 SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/88 SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/14/88 LRAMETER RESULTS I PARAMETER -------- (UG/L) --- RESULTS j� (ENZENE UG/L) ND j 1, 3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND BROMOBENZENE ND j 2, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE OMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ND CROMOFORM OMODICHLOROMETHANE I 1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ND j SIS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1yp j ETHYLBENZENE ND BROMOMETHANE ND j HEXACHLOR013UTA61ENE ND jBUTYLBENZENE ND j ISOPROPYLBENZENE ND EC-BUTYLBENZENEND ND I P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND TERT-BUTYLBENZENE ND j METHYLENE CHLORIDE RBON TETRACHLORIDE ND ND HLOROBENZENE I NAPHTHALENE ND HLOROETHANE ND I STYRENE ND LOROFORM I STYRENE ND ND j 1, 1, 1, 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND LOROMETHANE ND j 1, 1, 2, 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND VCHLOROTOLUENE ND j TETRACHLOROETHENE 4-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ND TOLUENE ND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE I ND j 1, 2, 3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND 2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND j 1, 2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE DIBROMOMETHANE ND j 1, 1, 6-TRICHLOROETHANE 02-DICHLOROBENZENE ND j 1, 1, 2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ND 4-DICHLOROBENZENE I TRICHLOROETHENE ND DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND I TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND ND j 1, 2, 3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 1-DICHLOROETHANE ND j 1, 2, 4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE I 1, 3, 5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND ND I VINYL CHLORIDE 5-1, 2-DICHLOROETHENE ND ; O-XYLENE ND NS-1, 2-DICHLOROETHENE NDN" 1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE I M-XYLENE ND ND j P-XYLENE ND 1iOVERIES OF INTERNAL STANDARDS FLUOROBENZENE 104 P ROMOFLUOROBENZENE 91 1 -DICHLOROBENZENE-D4 106 M[HOD DETECTION LIMIT = 1 UG/L 11/14/88 I��tit ' DATE BRUCE A. BORNSTEIN LABORATORY DIRECTOR i New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street ' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ( 508 ) 744-6600 00000am I IRONNRNTAL TF IN4 ANUANALYM, 'EPA 524. 2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN WATER CLIENT: GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH 6 Nichols Street N. E. C. ID # 811116 Salem,MA 01970 CLIENT ID: 105-111 CANAL STREET SALEM NSG-1 W 1 COMPOSITE WATER SAMPLE 50e-744-6600 SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/88 SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/14/88 ,PARAMETER RESULTS PARAMETER -- (UG/L) RESULTS (UG/L) 'BENZENE ND 1, 3—DICHLOROPROPANE ND BROMOBENZENE 2, 2—DICHLOROPROPANE ROMOCHLOROMETH NE NQ ND ROMODICHLOROMETHANE 1, 1—DICHLOROPROPENE ND ND I CIS-1, 3—DICHLOROPROPENE ND (ROMOFORM ND ETHYLBENZENE ND _ BROMOMETHANE ND HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND BUTYLBENZENE ND ISOPROPYLBENZENE ND EC—BUTYLBENZENE ND P—ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND TERT—BUTYLBENZENE ND METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND NAPHTHALENE ND HLOROBENZENE ND N—PROPYLBENZENE ND CHLOROETHANE ND STYRENE ND HLOROFORM ND 1, 1, 1, 2—TETRACHLOROETHANE ND HLOROMETHANE ND 1, 1, 2, 2—TETRACHLOROETHANE ND <—CHLOROTOLUENE ND TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 4—CHLOROTOLUENE ND TOLUENE ND IBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 1, 2, 3—TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ' 2—DIBROMO-3—CHLOROPROPANE ND 1, 2, 4—TRICHLOROBENZENE ND DIBROMOMETHANE ND 1, 1, 1—TRICHLOROETHANE ND 2—DICHLOR013ENZENE ND 1, 1, 2—TRICHLOROETHANE ND 3—DICHLOROBENZENE ND TRICHLOROETHENE ND 4—DICHLOROBENZENE ND TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 1, 2, 3—TRICHLOROPROPANE ND 1—DICHLOROETHANE ND 1, 2, 4—TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND ., 2—DICHLOROETHANE ND 1, 3, 5—TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND 1, 1—DICHLOROETHENE ND VINYL CHLORIDE ND U1, 2—DICHLORCETHENE ND O—XYLENE Nn 5— NS-1, 2-DICHLOROETHENE ND M-XYLENE IND 1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND P-XYLENE ND ICOVERIES OF INTERNAL STANDARDS % UOROBENZENE 95 BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 93 , 2-DICHLOROBENZENE-D4 106 �THOD DETECTION LIMIT = 1 UG/L ' 11/14/88 DATE BRUCE A. BORNSTEIN LABORATORY DIRECTOR i NEW ENGLAND CHROMACHEM 6 NICHOLS STREET SALEM, MA 01970 508-744-6600 L IRONNWNTAL T Y JN1: AND ANALMUS ' 6 Nichols Street Salem,MA 01970 ' CLIENT: GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH 608-744-6600 ' LABORATORY REPORT ----------------- PARAMETER SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ---------------------------------------------------------------- ' RCRA METALS 811118 WATER SAMPLE 105 - 111 CANAL ST. SALEM CAN-IWC ---------------------------------------------------------------- -,_.-. RESULTS _ M. D_L_ I Ag (mg/L) 0. 015 < 0. 01 ' As (mg/L) < 0. 001 < 0. 001 ' Ba (mg/L) < 1. 0 < 1. 0 Cd (mg/L) 0. 023 < 0. 005 ' Cr-T (mg/L) 0. 03 < 0. 01 i Hg (mg/L) < 0. 002 < 0. 002 ' Pb (mg/L) 0. 19 < 0. 05 Se (mg/L) 0. 539 < 0. 005 Sampled by: Client ' Sample R' cd: 11/14 /88 Sample Analyzed: 11/14/88 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- I l 11/14/88 BRUCE A. BORNSTEIN ' DATE LABORATORY DIRECTOR 1 GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1 ' APPENDIX C Summary of Qualifications ' Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. 204 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 1 Summary of Qualifications ' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER, INC. 204 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 ( 508 ) 745-6618 ' The Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. is a small business with headquarters in Salem which specializes in defining environmental regulations and providing technical consulting ' services to attorneys, developers, bankers, title companies, engineers, industry and government in order to satisfy these regulations. ' Existing federal, state and local laws are being modified and new laws enacted in order to protect the environment and the public health and safety. Compliance with these laws requires the ' submission of technical information to local, state, and federal regulatory agencies when operations are modified or new facilities are constructed. ' Some of the projects which have recently been undertaken. by the Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. , include: ' * Conducted numerous MGL c.21E site assessments ( 200-300 per year) for the presence of oil or hazardous materials . As necessary, we have coordinated and supervised remedial ' action programs on contaminated properties, including underground tank removal, groundwater recovery system installation and contaminated soil removal. ' * Prepared Notices of Intent and Wetland Compliance Reports for Conservation Commissions throughout the state for ' installation of submarine cables, seawalls, sewer lines, roadways, houses and drainage structures within the buffer zones of coastal and inland wetland resource areas. * Prepared expert testimony and adjudicatory hearing testimony for Wetland Filings before Mass. DEQE for projects in Wetland Buffer Zones. ' * Reviewed and recommended options to engineering companies, and city and state officials relative to alteration and ' restoration of ponds, lakes and fresh and salt water wetlands. * Recommended sewer outfall locations in Lynn, Salem, and Boston Harbor and evaluated impact of sewer pipeline through wetland and shellfish areas in Quincy, Weymouth, and Braintree. ' * Obtained Conservation Commission approvals for Eastern Route MBTA track, bridge and drainage improvements in Salem, Beverly, Wenham, Hamilton, Ipswich, Manchester, ' Gloucester and Rockport. * Analyzed technical reports and records of Acid Rain Damage ' in Massachusetts for New England Electric, Boston Edison, Commonwealth Electric, Northeast Utilities and Eastern Utilities Associates. 2 . In addition, the staff of the Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. , has experience in siting numerous land based and offshore energy facilities including: ' * Obtained U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Region 2 ) N.P.D.E.S. permit to allow ocean disposal of drilling mud ' and cuttings in the Mid Atlantic and therefore enabled oil and gas exploration to proceed. ' * Prepared permit strategy, documents and environmental reports and designed, subcontracted and supervised studies of land, water, and air environment for EG&G New England Energy Park 10, 000 ton/day coal gasification ' plant proposed for Fall River, MA. * Prepared permit strategy and documents for proposed New ' England Electric - EG&G co-generation plant to generate process steam and electricity at Millers Falls, MA. * Directed application for waiver of -stack tests at NASA Hazardous Waste Rocket Fuel Incinerator at Kennedy Space Center. ' Working in conjunction with Roy F. Weston, Inc. , we developed a plan for siting a central pretreatment facility for the tanneries in Peabody and Salem, Massachusetts, to achieve compliance with U.S. ' EPA Tannery Pretreatment Regulations which will be enforced beginning November 1985 . Our responsibilities on that project include acquisition and analysis of potential site - specific ' information and the coordination of the project with the tanners and various governmental and regulatory officials. We, also, are arranging and conducting a series of U.S. Industrial Pollution Control Tours for International Environmental Officials. This work is being undertaken for the World Environment Center and U.S. Department of State (Agency for International Development) . We have arranged the itinerary and conducted a tour for the Environmental Protection Minister of Tunisia. He visited industrial facilities in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New York, Texas and Florida. Similar visits are planned for other senior International Environmental officials. The activities in which we engage are multi-disciplinary in nature. They involve interacting with facility managers, attorneys, engineers, geologists, geohydrologists, chemists, biologists, economists and planners. We are often involved in work which deals ' with solid and liquid waste disposal alternatives, treatability of wastes, surface and ground water contamination, and the impacts of hazardous materials and chemicals on the environment and on public health and safety. We evaluate ocean outfalls, evaluate impacts to ' other water uses, define wetland boundaries, define compensation for wetland utilization, evaluate feasibility of dredging and disposal of dredge spoils, and prepare Environmental Impact Statements, ' Environmental Impact Reports and applications for environmental permits and approvals. 1 1 3 . ' Dr. Hugh F. Mulligan is the Director of the Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. , and he utilizes other individuals or firms, as necessary, to carry out the Center ' s environmental programs . Prior to establishing this company, Hugh Mulligan worked for ten years with engineering and environmental consulting firms and spent fifteen years in academic research, teaching and public service. 1 He has authored more than 50 scientific publications on Limnology, Aquatic Botany, Phytoplankton, and Oceanography and has presented papers at national and international symposia. He was awarded an NSF Fellowship at Cornell in 1961 , was awarded a Fullbright Fellowship to develop a Center of Excellence in ' Oceanography at the University of Karachi in Pakistan in 1975-76 and, in 1975, was selected by the U.S. and Rumanian Academies of Sciences for a 10-month Exchange Research Fellowship to study the Danube Delta of the Black Sea. He has worked closely with ' scientists from AID, World Bank, FAO, UNDP, and other international agencies. Dr. Mulligan has had considerable experience --in working on r projects that were quite controversial and often precedent setting. His role has been to design and receive industry and regulatory ' approval for special studies which satisfied the letter of the regulatory requirements and which were technically sound and cost effective. As the studies are being performed, he works closely with regulatory officials to insure that they are well informed and ' that the statutory requirements are met. Projects he has carried out include: ' * Obtained all environmental permits for Allied Specialty Chemical Oximes Plant in Hopewell, VA. * Designed regulatory studies, prepared a compliance plan ' and obtained ocean dumping permits for Allied Chemical Company enabling them to discharge industrial wastes into approved disposal area in the Mid-Atlantic. ' * Prepared the first Environmental Reports which achieved compliance with U.S.G.S. Regulations and consistency with CZM Regulations for companies exploring for oil and ' gas off Mid and North Atlantic coasts. * Obtained N.P.D.E.S. permits for Hudson River Power Plants with Thermal Discharge Demonstration Compliance Studies. * Designed and conducted complex studies on the ' Phytoplankton Productivity of Georges Bank for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management which were essential to permit oil and gas exploration. ' * Designed an Ocean Dumping Compliance Program for the Government of Australia. * Evaluated dredging and ocean disposal of dredged materials for the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers at Roosevelt Roads Naval Base, Puerto Rico. t 1 1 4 . tExperience with these and other projects has enabled Dr. Mulligan to analyze environmental problems and identify the most cost effective - technically sound solution. He can provide a third party role by preparing or reviewing proposed scopes-of-works; reviewing proposals and performing a technical overview of reports and studies while the work is in progress. 1 1 1 1 1 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts • I, Department of Public Safety ,,.,,.f ..\lassachusa•llo-Slalr BuJding Code 1.-80 CHIN)Se,-enth Edition City of Salem Building Permit Application for any Building other than a I. or 2-Family Dwellin (This Section For Official Use Only) 4, \ Building Permit Number: Date Applied: Building Inspector: SECTION l:LOCATION (Please indicate Block 0 and Lot 0 for locations for which a street address is not available) Yi ioS C'Ai,,, I- 5 544. VA .No.and Street City /To,vn Zip Code Name of Building lit applicable) SECTION 2:PROPOSED WORK If New Construction check here❑or check all that apply in the two rows below Existing Building a Repair Alteration ❑ 1 Addition Cl 1 Demolition ❑ (Please fill out and submit Appendix 1) Change of Use ❑ 1 Change of Occupancy ❑ Other ❑ Specify: Are building plans and/ur construction documents bring supplied as part of this permit application? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is.m Independent Structural Engineering Peer Review required? Yes ❑ No ❑ Brief Description of Proposed Work: 79 C7 / Q +G _ r+c-P oy i SECTION 3:COMPLETE THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION,ADDITION,OR CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY Check here if an Existing Building Evaluation is enclosed(See 780 CMR 3402.0) O Existing Use Group(s): - - Proposed Use Group(s): — Y Existing Hazard Index 780 CMR 34: Proposed Hazard Index 780 CMR 34: SECTION 4:BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA Existing Proposed No.of Flours/Stories(include basement levels)&Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) / Total Area(sq. ft.)and Total Height(ft.) SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) A: Assembly A-1 ❑ A-2r ❑ A-2nc❑ A-3 ❑ A-4❑ A•5❑ 1 Bi Business ❑ E: Educational ❑ F: Facto F-1 ❑ F2❑ H: High Hazard H-1 ❑ H-2❑ H-3 ❑ H-4❑ H-5❑ 1: Institutional 1-1 ❑ 1-2 ❑ 1-3❑ 14❑ M: Mercantile❑ R: Residential R-113 R-2❑ R-3❑ R-4❑ S: Storage S•1 ❑ S-2 ❑ U: Utility❑ Special Use❑and please describe below: Special Use: SECTION 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPE(Check as applicable) IA ❑ IB ❑ IIA ❑ . fill ❑ IIIA ❑ 1110 ❑ IV ❑ VA ❑. VB ❑ SECTION 7:SITE INFORMATION (refer to 780 CMR 111.0 for details on each item) - Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Trench Permit: Debris Removal: Public A trench will not be Lica•n.ed Di.posal Site❑ - ublic❑ Check it oubnfa•19uud Lune❑ Indimtr municipal ❑ , ur.pacily: 1'nvate❑ or mdcnti(v Zune: or tin site.vstem❑ required❑or trench permit is vnclused ❑ - Railroad right•o(•way: Hazards to Air Navigation: \IA I Ibtnr,. .•...... Nnt Applicable❑ I.Structure,c Is their re%ira completed, .c l ,-nc. nl t., Build cnclovd ❑ 1'a.❑ ur No❑ Yes❑ \u ❑ SECTION 8:CONTENT OF CERTIFICA rE OF OCCUPANCY (:,fuom ut C.4lv: _ Use Croup(,): ripen(Con.tn,cuun: Occupant Lund per l lnur: I li.c. the buddmt;contain in Sprinkler S%,1cm': SpvCMI S11pUl tiuns: Ao(l -�o — saLgi:4s ��cPrBss SECTION 9: PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Name and Address of Pro Fperty Owner /1 S.`annL ice los ` 1JAI s A -e Name(Print) No.and Street City/Town Zip Property 01%ner Contact Information: �" - - —L �a2 ,2s75 Title Telephone No.(business) Telephone No. (cell) a-mad address If applicable, the propen%owner herebv authorizes Name Street Address City/Town State Zip to act on the pro pert%owner's behalf, in all matters relative to work authorized by This buildin• permit application. SECTION 10:CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fill out Appendix 2) (If buildin•is less than 35,0tV cu.it.of enclu. d s ace and/or not under Comstruction Control then check here D and skip Section 10.1) '. 100.1 Registered Professional Responsible for Construction Control l0 ppn L: mA}rr( t nn T one No Re is ri Street Address City/Town State Zip ne Expiration Date 10.2 General Contractor Company Name: 5 a� 57Av Nam"pp of Per,Tun Rnnsible fur unss uctfun License No. and Type if Applicable Street Address City/Town State Zip bl� L to>s Telephone No.(business) Telephone No.(cell) e-mail address SECTION 11:WORKERS'COMPENSAT ON MSURANCE AFFlDAVI (M.G.L.c.152.§ 25C(6)) A Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? Yes O No O SECTION 12:CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PERMIT FEE Item Estimated Costs:(Labor and Materials) Total Construction Cost(from Item 6)=$ 1. Building $ Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x_(Insert here 2. Electrical $ appropriate municipal factor)_$ 3. Plumbing $ 4. Mechanical (HVAC) $ Note:Minimum fee=$ (contact municipality) 5. Mechanical (Other) $ Enclose check payable to 6.Total Cost $ o o t7 (contact municipality)and write check number here SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT By entering my name below, I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this applicqitiun tr e and Ccura to the best of my knowledge and understanding. Please nl,nd sign.no Title Telephone.No. Dale �1 �lzy� s � sA✓S �S IIA;4 t6/qoG Street Address Cit.t Tot%n Slate Zip .Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: Date 3 � o fECE1VED .;iVECTIONAL SERVICES The Commonwealth of Massachusetts W Department of P�� &Mtn 2 A 1I* 3 b Massachusetts State Building Code(780 CMR) Building Permit Application for any Building other than a One-or Two-Family Dwelling (This.Section For Official Use Only):. . Building Permit Number: Date.Applied: - Building Official: SECTION 1:LOCATION(Please indicate Block#and Lot#for locations for which a street address is not available) 1d� � Sr ?Jt970 S10i_;LAlVE-- s (� No.and Street City/Town Zip Code Name of Building(if applicable) SECTION2:PROPOSED WORK. 1 Edition of MA State Code used_ - If New Construction check here❑or check all that apply in the two rows below Existing Building❑ Repair❑ Alteration ❑ 1 Addition❑ I Demolition ❑ (Please fill out and submit Appendix 1) Change of Use ❑ 1 Change of Occupancy ❑ Other ❑ Specify: Are building plans and/or construction documents being supplied as part of this permit application? Yes ❑ No Is an Independent Structural Engineen. Peer Review required? ,/' T Yes ❑ No Brief Description,pf Proposed " �S / fi�L'- T/4 o h SECTION 3:COMPLETE THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION,ADDITION,OR - CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY - Check here if an Existing Building Investigation and Evaluation is enclosed(See 780 CMR 34) ❑ Existing Use Group(s): - Proposed Use Group(s): SECTION 4:BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA Existing Proposed No.of Floors/Stories(include basement levels)&Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) Total Area(sq.ft.)and Total Height(ft.) SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) - - - - - A: Assembly A-1❑ A-2❑ Nightclub ❑ A-3 ❑ A4 Cl A-5❑ 1 B: Business ❑ E: Educational ❑ R Facto F-1❑ F2❑ H: Hi h Hazazd H-1 ClH-2❑ - H-3 ❑ H4❑ H-5❑ I: Institutional I-1❑ I-2❑ I-3❑ 14❑ M: Mercantile❑ R- Residential R-10 R-2❑ R-3❑ R4❑ S. Storage Sl CIS-2❑ U: Utility❑ Special.Use❑and please describe below: l U Speciase: SECTION 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPE(Check as applicable) IA ❑ 10 0 IIA ❑ JIB ❑ 1 HIA ❑ IIIB ❑ IV ❑ 1 VA ❑ VB ❑ SECTION 7.SITE INFORMATION(refer to 780 CMR 111.0 for details on each item) Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Trench Permit: Debris Removal: Public❑ Check if outside Flood Zone❑ Indicate municipal❑ A trench will not be Licensed Disposal Site❑ Private❑ or indentify Zone: or on site system❑ required❑or trench or specify: permit is enclosed❑ Railroad right-of-way: Hazards to Air Navigation: NIA\I Iistorlc Commiwon Revi,_w Prod s: Not Applicable❑ Is Structure within airport approach area? Is their review completed? or Consent to Build enclosed❑ 1 Yes❑ or No❑. Yes❑- No ❑ SECTION 8:CONTENT OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Edition of Code: Use Group(s): Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Floor: Does the building contain an Sprinkler System?: Special Stipulations: M4tiL4r5D l 11st2-01, L 2-',)D MAILED l /l(o I771 (0 Al F SECTION 9:-PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Name and Address of Property,Owner`;.1 4.1 Name(Print) No.and Street_ City/Town Zip r3£ -11 A of rtL 161 Property Owner Contact Information: Title Telephone No.(business) Telephone No. (cell) e-mail address If applicable,the property owner hereby authorizes Name Street Address City/Town State Zip to act on the property owner's behalf,in all matters relative to work authorized by this budding permit application. SECTION 10:CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fillout Appendix 2): f buddingis less than 35,000 cu.ft.of enclosed space and?or not under construction Control then check here O and ski' Section 10.1 10.1 Registered Professional Responsible for Construction Control - - - Name(Registrant) Telephone No. e-mail address Registration Number Street Address City/Town - State Zip Discipline Expiration Date 10.2 General Contractor_67 - i4ro4L y A/o Y Con fjs`rr✓Tjo ; �� C mpany Name �� eorg e 0)YfyoS C S- 0� 223 ` �t' jZC� r� Name of Person Responsible for Construction- License No. and Type if Applicable (0 0 CA-S rc,r �4v� f/n, i z �S s e� /Y1�1 0/9 L° Street Address City/Town State Zip Telephone No. business Telephone No. cell e-mail address SECTION 11:WORKERS'CONIPENSA'I'ION INSURANCE AFFIbAVI'1' M.G.L.c.152.9 25C 6 A Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? - Yes O No 13 - SECTION 12.CONSTRUCTION COSTS.AND PERMITFEE - --' Item Estimated Costs:(Labor and Materials) Total Construction Cost(from Item 6)_$ 1.Building $ F,0 r +f-D Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x_(Insert here 2.Electrical $ appropriate municipal factor)_$ 3.Plumbing $ d. Mechanical (HVAC) $ Note:Minimum fee=$ (contact municipality) 5. Mechanical Other $ Enclose check payable to 6.Total Cost $ �--�. P (contact municipality)and write check number here - SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT By entering my name below,I hereby itte.4 under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this a plication is true and accurate to the of inowledge.and understanding. eorq.t v� ares tx4 T" q ')�D-815(4;?1'7 1- 12 I6 P,le pr{gt t�jsi n name r� v^ I Title &y 49/hone Z Date FF((''nn'' `LL§�r e l�1 Street Address City/Town State Zip Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: b Name Date 4 RECEIVED `tSPECT The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Safety 101b FEB —3 A c� 4 q Massachusetts State Building Code(780 CZAR) Building Permit Application for any Building other than a One-or Two-Family Dwelling (This Section For Official Use Only) Building Permit Number: Date Applied; _Budding.Official: 1 SECTION 1:LOCATION(Please indicate Block k and Lot#for locations for which a street address is not available) /1 L No.and Street City/Town Zip Code Name of Building(if applicable) SECTION 2:PROPOSED WORK. nn Edition of MA State Code used If New Construction check here❑or check all that apply in the two rows below t Y�J Existing Building❑ Repair❑ 1 Alteration ❑ Addition❑ 1 Demolition ❑ (Please fill out mid submit Appendix 1) Change of Use ❑ Change of Occupancy ❑ 1 Other ❑ Specify: Are building plans and/or construction documents being supplied as part of this permit application? Yes ❑ No ❑ Is an Independent Structural Engineering Peer Review required? Yes ❑ No ❑ Brief Description of Proposed Work: SECTION 3:COMPLETE THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION,ADDITION,OR CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY Check here if an Existing Building Investigation and Evaluation is enclosed(See 780 CMR 34) O Existing Use Group(s): I Proposed Use Group(s): SECTION 4:BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA Existing Proposed No.of Floors/Stories(include basement levels)&Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) Total Area(sq.ft.)and Total Height(ft.) SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) A: Assembly A-1❑ A-2❑ Nightclub ❑ A-3 ❑ A4❑ A-5❑ B: Business ❑ E: Educational ❑ F: Facto F-1 ❑ F2❑ H: Hi h Hazard H-1❑ H-2❑ H-3 ❑ H-4❑ H-5❑ 1: Institutional 1-1❑ I-2❑ I-3❑ 14❑ M: Mercantile❑ R: Residential R-10 R-2❑ R-3❑ R-4❑ S: Storage S-1 ❑ S-2❑ U: Utility❑ Special Use❑and please describe below: Special Use. SECTION 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPE(Check as a licable) IA ❑ IB ❑ IIA ❑ IIB ❑ IIIA ❑ IIIB ❑ 1 IV ❑ VA ❑ VB ❑ SECTION 7:SITE INFORMATION(refer to 780 CMR 111.0 for details on each item) Trench Permit: Debris Removal: Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Licensed Disposal Site❑ Public❑ Check if outside Flood Zone❑ Indicate municipal❑ A trench will not be P required❑or trench or specify: Private❑ or indentify Zone: or on site system❑ permit is enclosed❑ Railroad right-of-way: Hazards to Air Navigation: ai\11, t;ric C, my,f Sion R .u , Not Applicable❑ Is Structure within airport approach area? Is their review completed? or Consent to Build enclosed❑ Yes❑ or No❑ Yes❑ No ❑ SECTION 8:CONTENT OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Edition of Code: Use Group(s): Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Floor: Does the building contain an Sprinkler System?: Special Stipulations: 2 l" I 16 SECTION9: PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Name and Atidress bf Property Owner 3 Name(Print) _, No.and Street City/Town Zip Property Owner Contact Information: Title Telephone No.(business) Telephone No. (cell) e-mail address If applicable,the property owner hereby authorizes Jam. Qr,)r4 4W4-1-- sr 1, 41-x4 GA, Name Street Address `City/Town State Zip *,,,,(.Regist o er owner's behalf,in all matters relative to work authorized b this buildingpermit application. SECTION 10:CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fillout Appendix.2). is less than 33,000 cu.ft.of enclosed space and/or not under Construction Control then check here Dana ski Section 10.1 Professional Res onsible far Construction Control nt) Tele hone No. a-mail address Reg stration N ber .5T � fJS-22- Za/ Street ddress City/ wn 541te Zip Discipline Expiration Date I 10.2 General Contractor - - - Company Name Nance of Person Responsible for Construction License No. and Type if Applicable Street Address City/Town State Zip Telephone No. business Telephone No. cell e-mail address SECTION 11:WORKERS'CONIPGNSA'IION INSURANCE AFF'IDAVl'I M.G.C.c.152§ 25C 6 A Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the issuance of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? - Yes❑ No ❑ SECTION 12:.CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PERMIT FEE': Item Estimated Costs:(Labor and Materials) Total Construction Cost(from Item 6)_$ 1. Building $ 000 r Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x_(Insert here 2. Electrical $ appropriate municipal factor)_$ 3. Plumbing $ 4.Mechanical (HVAC) $ Note: Minimum fee=$ (contact municipality) S. Mechanical Other $ _ Enclose check payable to 6.Tot $ ,9 O (contact municipality)and write check number here SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDINCOPERMFr APPLICANT By en ring my name low,I hereby attest under the pains and ties of perjury that all of the information contained in this applica ion is true d ccu ,to t th best of my knowledge an and rstanding. _ �_ o / ase rint nd si rn yr a Title Telephone No. Dat r Oa/ . 0 Street Address City Town / tate Zip Nunicipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: Name Date