The URL can be used to link to this page

64-445 - - CONSERVATION COMMISSION �� ln9-v�15 Noy � � � �£s�j j?,�fo�,, I�{�t-�;� C�•a�n..�.cl �C¢�iw+a,x.� ` � l - - - . - - -- _ -;_.� . . � -Tighe&Bond ` _ ConsultingEngineers h :� :� 4'. Enuironmental Specialists .�`� . ` ,.,r , G' Todd M. Brown,P.E. "� • , � � [�ice President Y � <� ��53 Southampron Road Westfie7d,.MA 01085-5308 ' + ' -��`MoinNumber413-56d�I600�DiredN�mber�413 3 72-32 6 4.�. , . � � ' Fux.413-562-5317 emaiC tmbrouin@dghebond.com �` ,,,,, ' .. _. '-� -� - -- -- - �_ _ _ _ j ALAN F.TAUBERT,)r.,P.E. Project Manager � �.J� South Essex Sewerage District 50 Fort Avenue (978)744-4550 ext 127 . P.O.Box 989 Fax(978)741-0478 Salem,MAOI970 � Email:ataubert@sesd.com r� _ _ _ � NICHOLAS W. BIELLO `o,�<a^`T°�,ss � Project Engineer g � � � J. D'AMICO, INC. ��'"`„°�"�°'` i General Contractor � .. Excavation and Utilities . ( 10 York Avenue (781)9613700 . Randolph,MA02368 FAX (781)986-466� . i � R �v��c�M�� 3 . - � � CITY OF SALEM �� CONSERVATION COMMISSION ', October 24, 2008 II Alan F. Taubert South Esseac Sewerage District 50 Fort Avenue PO Box 989 Salem, MA 01970 Re: Certificate of Compliance—DEP #64-44�SESE Harmony Grove Road Salem, MA Dear Mr.Taubert Enclosed, please find the Certificate of Compliance for the above referenced project This Document must be recorded at the Esse�c County Registry of Deeds, Shedand Pazk 45 Congress Stree� Suite 4100 Salem, Massachusetts. Please fill out and return the Recording Information on page 4 of the Certificate of Compliance, which will indicate to �e Salem Conservation Commission that the document has 6een recorded. If you have any further questions please Eeel free to contact me at (978) 619-5685. II Sincerely, : C/"_�yC!/J � Cazey Duque i Conservation Agent/ StafFPlanner I Enciosures CC: DEP Northeast Regional Office II _ ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection i�-- Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number � WPA Form 8B — Certificate of Compliance sa-aas � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Provided by DEP A. Project Information Important: When flling out � This Certificate of Compliance is issued to: forms on the Harold Newhall South Essex Sewerage District computer, use Name only the tab 50 Fort Avenue, PO Box 989 key to�mave your Cursor- Mailing Address do not use the Salem MA Ot 970 return key. City/Town Sfate Zip Code �,� 2. This Certificate of Compliance is issued for work regulated by a final Order of Conditions issued to: Harold Newhall South Essex Seweraqe District Name �°`� May 10 2007 64-445 Dated DEP File Number 3. The project site is located at: Harmony Grove Road Salem Street Address Ciryliown Map 16 Lot 240 Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number the final Order of Condition was recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Property Owner(if different) - Essex 3462 541 County Book Page Certificate 4. A site inspection was made in the presence of the applicant, or the applicanYs agent, on: October 10, 2008 Date B. Certification Check all that apply: � Complete Certification: It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorily completed. ❑ Partial Certification: It is hereby certified that only the following portions of work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed. The project areas or work subject to this partial certification that have been completed and are released from this Order are: wpaform Bb.tloc•�ev.7/13/04 Page 1 of 4 `� Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection �— Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number. ` �� WPA Form 8B — Certificate of Compliance 64-445 � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 ProvidedbyDEP B. Certification (cont.) ❑ Invalid Order of Conditions: It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions never commenced. The Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no i longer valid. No future work subject to regulation under the Wetlands Protection Act may commence without filing a new Notice of Intent and receiving a new Order of Conditions. ❑ Ongoing Conditions: The following conditions of the Order shall continue: (Include any conditions contained in the Final Order, such as maintenance or monitoring, that should continue for a longer period). Condition Numbers: C. Authorization Issued by: Salem (X�E�v dY Z�� Conservation Commission Date of Issuance This Certificate must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission and a copy sent to the applicant and a opr' te R nal Office (S Attachment). Signatures: � / �l VC.C/V wpalorm B�.ao<•rev,1/13ro4 Page 2 of 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection �—, Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands oeP F��e n,�mbe�: �� WPA Form 8B — Certificate of Compliance sa-aas � � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 ProvidedbyDEP C. Authorization (cont.) Notary Acknowledgement Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex 9 October 2008 On thiS paY �f Month Year before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared K. Cornacchio, D. Pabich, M. Blier, R. Christie, K. Glidden, and A. Hamilton, Name of Document Signer proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was/were personally known Description of evidence of identifcation to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. As member of Salem Conservation Commission City/Town CAHEY R.DWt�B 1�(COWpIWEAI� W�W�OURT11 y�� +a sma �, I,Q�J Signature of Nota Public Care R. Du es � Printed Name of otary Public August 16, 2013 � My Commission Ezpires(Date) Place notary seal and/or any stamp above Signature of Notary Public wpatorm Bb.doc•rev.]/13I04 Page 3 of 4 �r � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection �— Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ' �,� WPA Form 8B — Certificate of Compliance 64-445 � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131 40 � � Provided by DEP D. Recording Confirmation The applicant is responsible for ensuring that this Certificate of Compliance is recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located. Detach on dotted line and submit to the Conservation Commission. To: Salem �� Conservation Commission Please be advised that the Certificate of Compliance for the project at: Harmony Grove Road 64-445 Project Location DEP File Number � Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: County for: Property Owner � � and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property on: Date Book Page If recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is: If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is: Document Number Signature of Applicant wpa(orm Bb.doc•rev.]/13I04 Page 4 0(4 �'R �- . Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ��_- Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands ` � DEP Regional Addresses '`� Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131 40 Mail transmitta/forms and DEP payments,payable to: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 DEP Western Region Aaa� cazm Hamoae� Monme a��nsnem ryn�9nam 436 Dwight Street A9awam Conway Hancock Monlague Plainfeltl Wales Allartl Gumminglon MaNeld Monterey Ri[hmonG Ware $UIIB 402 Amherst Dallon MavAey Monlgomery Rowe Waiwick Springfeld, MA 01103 n:nreia oeemeia Heain Monson p„s:en wasm�q�oo PhO�¢:473-784-1100 Becke� Eas�hampton tiinstlale Moun�Washington Sanaisneid WenOell Belchenown EastLongmeatlow Hollane NewAsnbr� Savoy Wesifela F8X:413-784-1149 Bernartlslon Egremont Holyoke NewMatlboroug� SheReIE Wes��amplan Blandfortl Erving Hunlinglon NewSalem Shel�ume WesiSpnngfeld Bri�elC Flonaa Lanesboroug� Notlh Atlams S�utesbury West Slockbndge BucklanG Gill Lee No�hamp�on Soulhampton Whalely . G�aAemanl Gos�en Lenox Northfiela Soul�Haaley Wilbreham C�es�ire GranDy Leverelt Orange Southwick WilliamsEurg Chesler GrenNlle Leytlen Olis Sprin�el0 Williamsbwn ChesteKeld Great Bamngton Longmeatlow Palmer Stockbridge Windsor Chiropee Greenlieltl Ludlow Pel�am Sundetlantl WptlhinB�on qarksCurg Hatlley Mitldlefield Pem Tolland DEP Central Regian Acton Challon Hopkin�on Mill�ury RNIanE Uxbridge Ashbumham qinlon Hubbardston Millville Shitle 627 Main Street r waReo As�by Douglas HuGson NewBraintree ShrewsOury � Webster Worcesler, MA 01608 - ninoi Dutlley Hollis�on Norihborough Soulh�orough Wesibaaug� Phone:508-792-7650 Aubum �unslaCle Lanwster Nonhbndge Southentlge WestBoylslon FB%:508-792-7621 AYer East Bmokfeltl leicester North Bmokfeltl Spencer Wesl BrookfiNG Barte FilchOurg Leortunster Oakham Sleding Wes�torG TDD:508-767-2788 seningham Gamner uulemn Oniom Stow Westmins�er Bedin Grafton Wnenburg Paxlon � SWrbntlge Winc�endon Blackslone Gro�on Marlpomugh Pepperell Sutton Worcesler Bol�on Harvartl MaynarC Petersham Temple�on Boxbomugh Ha�Ewick � Medway Ppillips�an Townsentl 9aylston Holtlen Menaon Prince�an Tyngsbomugh Brookfieltl Hopedale Milford Royals�on Upton DEP Southeast Region Abington DarirtqWh Freelown MaVapoisel� Pmvinrebwn Tisbury 20 Riverside Drive A�ushnet Dennis Gay Heatl MiEClebomugh Raynham Tmm LBkBvi110, MA 02347 A��leboro Digmon Gosnold Nanmcket RehaEom Wareham Avon Duxbury Malifax NewBed(or7 Rochesler Wellflee! Phone:508-946-2700 Bamstable Eas�ham Hanover Norlh Atllebomug� Rockland Wesl Bntlgewaler Fax:506-947-6557 Berkley EasiBntlgewaler Hanson Notlon Sanawich Weslport Bourne Easton Harxich Norwell Sciluate WesiTlsbury TDD: 508-946-2795 Brewster Etlgatlown Kingslan Oak BIUHs Seekonk Whilman B�idgewater Fai�haven Lakeville Otleans Shamn Wrenlham Bmckton Fall River MansfiNtl Pembmke Somersel Varmouth Garver Falrtqu�h Marion plainville Slaug�lon C�aNam Foxbomugh Marshfeltl Plyrtqulh Swansea Chilrtark Franklin Mashpee Plymplon Tavnlon DEP Northeast Region Amesbury Chelms(ortl Hingpam Merrimac Quincy Wakefeld Antlover Ghelsea Holbrook Me�huen Rantlol t WinterStreet Oh Walpole Atling�m Cohassel HWi Miadlelan Reading Wal�ham BostOn,MA 02108 nsniana Conmrd Ipswich Miiiis Revere Wa�ertown PhOnB:617-654-6500 BetlbrG Danvers �awrence Milmn Rockpon waylane F2x: 617-556-1049 Beimont Deaham Lexing�on Naham aowiey Wellesley Beverly �over Lincdn Nalick Salem Wenham TDD:617-574-6868 e'iuenca �racut Loweli Neetlham Saiisbury WestNewbury Boston Essex Lynn NewOary Saugus Weslon Baxfartl .Everelt �ynnfelC NewOuryport SherCorn WeslwoaE Brainiree Pramingham Maltlen Newton Somerville WeymoWh Bmokline Georgelown Manchester-By-The-Sea Nodolk Stoneham Wilmngton Butlin8lon Gloucesler Marbleheatl NorihAneover SuGbu ry Winc�esler � CamEriGge Gmvelantl MedfelE Nonh Reatling Svrdmpscall Wint�mp Canlon . Hamilion Medlo�E Noiwood TewksGury Wo�urn Catlisle Havertiill Melrose PeaEody To sfeltl P wpalormeb.tloc•DEP Atltlresses�rev.10R4/OB Page 1 of 1 . ��c�� s CITY OF SALEM �'�� CONSERVA�'ION �- COMMISSION May i o, Zoo� Todd Bmwn Tighe and Bond, Inc 400 Unicom Park Dr, Woburn; I�fq 01801 Re: Order of Condidona—DEP#64-445 Peabody Metering Stadon-Harmony Grove Road, Salem,Massachusetts Deaz Mr. Brown: Enclosed, please find the Order of Conditions for the above referenced project. Following the 10-day appeai period(as of May 21, 2007),Uus document and the attached Speciat Conditions must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds (36 Federal Street, Salem, MA). Once recorded, please return a copy of Page 9 of the Order, which will indicate to the Commission that the document has been recorded. As indicated in the Order,prior to any work commencing: 1• this Order must be recorded, 2. a sign shail be displayed showing DEP File#64-445 within public view, and 3. contact me at least 48 hours prior to any activity to schedule a pre-construction meeting to review the Order with your(llred contractor. If you have any further questions,please feel &ee to contact me 978-619-5685. Sincerely, {�` Carey Duqu Conservation AgenU StaffPlanner Enclosures CC: Harold Newhall, South Essex Sewerage District DEP Northeast Regional Office i 0 i Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ; Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: � ' WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-445 ' Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. Generai Information Important: Salem When filling From: 1.Conservation Commission outforms on the computer, 2.This issuance is for(check one): a. � Order of Conditions b. ❑ Amended Order of Conditions use only the tab key to 3. To: Applicant: move your cursor-do not Harold Newhall use the return a.First Name South Essex Seweraae District key. b. Last Name c Company � 50 Fort Avenue, PO Box 989 m d. Mailing Address Salem � e.Ciry/iown MA 01970 t.State g.Zip Code "0'" a. Property Owner(if different from applicant): a. First Name b. Last Name a Company tl. Mailing Address e. Citylfown i.State g.Zip Code s. Project Location: Harmonv Grove Road Salem. a.Street Address Map 16 b.Ciry/iown c.Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel 240 Latitude and Longitude, if known IlOtO: d Parcel/Lot Number electronic filers wi�l click for GIS locator): e.iattude7 52 -70 55'3.04" � f. Longitude s. Property recorded at the Fegistry of Deeds for(attach additional information if more than one parcel): Essex a.Counry 3462 b.Certificate('rf registered land) c.eook 541 d. Page �. Dates: March 28, 2007 April 26 2007 a.Date Notice of Intent Filed MaV 10, 2007 b. Date Public Hearing Closed c. Date o}Issuance a. Final Approved Plans and Other pocuments (attach additional plan or document references as needed); Peabod Meterin Chamber Im rovements: South Essex Sewera e District a. Plan Title TMF b.Prepared By c.Signed antl Stamped by March 20, 2007 varies for each detailed drawin d. Final Revision Date e.Scale f.Additional Plan or pocument Titfe g. Date wyabrrtS.tice• rev.yt/OS Page 1 of 9 � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ' WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings �. Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Following the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided in this application and presented at the public hearing, this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Check all that apply: a. � Public Water Supply b. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish c. � Prevention of Pollution d. � Private Water Supply e. � Fisheries �• � Protection of Wildlife Habitat 9. � Groundwater Supply n. � Storm Damage Prevention i. � Flood Control 2. This Commission hereby finds the project, as proposed, is: (check one of the following boxes) Approved subject to: a. � the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the pertormance standards set forth in the wetlands regulations. This Commission orders that all work shall be pertormed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above, the following General Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order. To the extent that the foliowing conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, these conditions shall control. Denied because: b. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the pertormance standards set forth in the wetland regulations. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect these interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the pertormance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site, the work, or the effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act. Therefore, work on this project may not go forward unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the AcYs interests, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and why it is necessary is attached to this Order,as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) 3 ❑ Buffer Zone impacts: Shortest distance between limit of project disturbance and wetland boundary (if available) a.linear feet Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement 4. ❑ Bank a.linear feet b. linea�feet c.linear feet s. ❑ Bordering Vegetated d. linearfeet Wetland a.square feet b.s uara feet 4 c.square feet d.square feet s. ❑ Land Under Waterbodies a.squa�e feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet and Waterways e.cu.yd dredged f.cu.yd dredged wpalorm5.a«• rev.3�1/os PaBe 2 of 9 � , , Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection . Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ` WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration p �. � Bordering Land 160 iso Re lacement Repiacement Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.s uare feet 4 c.square feet d.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage e.cubic feet t.cubic feet g.cubic feet e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject h.cubic feet t0 FIOOdi�g a.square feet b.square feet Cubic Feet Flood Storage c.cubic teet d.cubic feet �e.cubic feet f,cubic feet 9. � Rivertront area 160 isp a.total sq.feet b.total sq.feet Sq R within 100 R �60 t60 c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet f.square feet Sq ft between 700-200 ft � o g.square feet � h.square feet i.square feet Coastal Resource Area Impacts: Check ali that apply below. (For Approvals Only) �'square feet �o. ❑ Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below �i. ❑ Land Under the Ocean a.square feet b.square feet c.cu.yd dredged d.cu.yd dredged iz. ❑ Barrier Beaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below �3 ❑ Coastal Beaches a.square teet b.square feet c.Gy nourishmt. d.Gy nourishmt. �4. ❑ Coastal Dunes a.square feet b.square feet c.c/y nourishmt. d.Gy nourishmt �5� ❑ Coastai Banks a.linearfeet b.linearfeet is. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores a.square feet b.square feet ». ❑ Salt Marshes a.square feet b.squaie feet c.s uare feet 4 d.square feet ie. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds � a.square feet b.square feet c.cu.yd dredged d.cu.yd dredged is. ❑ Land Containing Shellfish a.square teet b.s uare feet 9 c.square feet d.square feet zo. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above . a.cu.yd dredged b.cu.yd dredged 2�. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage a.square feet b.square feet wyalorm$,Ga• rev.3/1Po5 Page 3 ol 9 i i � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau ot Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: � ` WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-44_ � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 i C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (only applicable to approved projects) 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all refated statutes and other regulatory measures, shail be deemed cause to revoke or modify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: a. the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or b. the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but fess than five years, from the date of issuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three years, the eMension date and the special circumstances warranting the eutended time period are set forth as a special condition in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon application to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill. Any fill shall contain no trash, refuse, rubbish, or debris, including but not limited to lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles, or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. This Order is not final until all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or if such an appeal has been taken, until all proceedings before the Department have been completed. 8. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and then has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land, the Final Order shalt also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done. The recording information shall be submitted to this Conservation Commission on the form at the end oi this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less then two square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection"[or, "MA DEP"] "File Number 64-445 ^ . wpalarmS.Ga• rev.3�1/OS Page 4 0l 9 ° Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ,; Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands �EP Fiie Number: ; ' WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions s4-445 ; Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 ; ; C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 70. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order, the Conservation Commission shaii be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before DEP. 11. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance (WPq Form 8A)to the Conservation Commission. 12. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 13. Any change to the plans identified in Condition #12 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 14. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compliance with the conditions stated in this Order, and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 15. This Order of Conditions shall apply to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person pertorming work conditioned by this Order. 16. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the 4icinity of the proposed work area shali be marked by wooden stakes or flagging. Once in place, the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 17. All sedimentation barriers shall be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized with vegetation or other means. At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction, the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed. The applicant shall immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission, which reserves the right to require additional erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another�imit of work line has been approved by this Order. 18. All work associated with this Order is required to comply with the Massachusetts Stormwater Policy Standards. Special Conditions: If you need more spacefor additional conditions, select box to attach a text document � v.palorrtS.Got• rev.3/1/OS Pape 5 of 9 ? . ` Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ` ' WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions s4-445 , Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance �. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? � Yes ❑ No z. The hereby finds (check one that applies): Conservation Commission s. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw specifically: a. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw b.Citation Therefore, work on this project may not go fonvard unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards, and a final Order of Conditions is issued. 4• ❑ that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or bylaw: a. Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw The Commission orders that a�i work shall be pertormed in accordance with the fol�owingnconditions and with the Notice of Intent referenced above. To the extent that the following conditions modify or differ from the plans, specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent, the conditions shall control. If you need more sPace tor c. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as follows: additional Th8 S conditions, pecial conditions attached to this Order of Conditions relate to both the City of Salem's local seiectboxto ordinance and the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. attach a teM document � � wpatortn5.0oc• rev.3�1/OS �. � Paqe 6 0l 9 _ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ' � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ' WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 E. Issuance This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise specified as a special � �� condition pursuant to General Conditions#4, from the date of issuance. i. oace f issuance Please indicate the number of inembers who will sign this torm: �\] This Order must be signed by a majority of the Conservation Commission. 2. Number o�ig ers� "'� The Order must be mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested) or hand delivered to the applicant. A copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office, if not filing electronically, and the property owner, if different from applicant. Signatures: ,, � " � � �O ; �7°.� —� �� . , Notary Ac�Cnowledgement Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex On this os of �� 2007 Y Month Year Before me, the undersigned Notary Public, K. Cornacchio, D. Pabich, M. Blier, D. Summer, personally appeared A. Hamilton, and K. Glidden proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was/were personally known uescnption of evidence of idenhficahon to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose. As member of Salem c�ry�rown Conservation Commission ca�R.ou� / ��p� Mrc�nm..w,� �B�W 142013 Sig ature o Notary Public � Carey R. uques Printed Name of Notary Public Place notary seai and/or any stamp above Aupust 16 2013 My Commission Expires(Date) This Order is issued to the applicant as follows: ❑ by hand delivery on � by certified mail, return receipt requested, on Date —_1S1�L '� �w� Date I wpatorm5.tla• rev.3/1/OS PaBe]ol 9 � � � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection • � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: " WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 6444= Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 F. Appeals The applicant, the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order, any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to request the appropriate DEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Conditions. The request must be made by certified mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form, as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(7) within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shaii at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant. Any appellants seeking to appeal the DepartmenPs Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order or Determination, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order or Determination. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not contribute to the protection of the interests identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, (M.G.L. c. 131, §40) and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations (310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetiands Protection Act or regulations, the Department has no appel�ate jurisdiction. Section G, Recording Iniormation is available on the following page. wpaforrtS.Ea• rer.3�1/p5 � PaBe 8 of 9 ; Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands � DEP File Number: WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-44__ 5___ Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 G. Recording Information This Order of Conditions must be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located, within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land, the Final Order shall also be noted in the Registrys Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land , subject to the Order. In the case of registered land, this Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Certificate of Title of the owner of the land subject to the Order of Conditions. The recording information on Page 7 of this form shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission listed Salem below. Conservation Commission Detach on dotted line, have stamped by the Registry of Deeds and submit to the Conservation Commission. ---------------------------------------------------�-------------------------------------------------------- To: Salem Conservation Commission Piease be advised that the Order of Conditions tor the Project at: South Essex Sewerage District located on Harmony Grove Road 64-445 � DEP File Number Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: County Book --�_ fOf: Page Property Owner and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property in: Book Page In accordance with the Order of Conditions issued on: Date If recorded land, the instrument number identifying this transaction is: Instrument Number If registered land, the document number identifying this transaCtion is: Document Number Signature of Applicant wpa�ormS.tloC• rev.3�1/OS Page 9 of 9 � � � Attachment to Order of Condiuons # 64-445 : Page lof 5 'r SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE #64-445 ; Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements South Essex Sewerage District Harmony Grove Road City of Salem, Massachusetts � ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estima[ed Habitats or Raze Wildlife and Certified Vemal Pools Map (June 1, 2003) from Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program(NHESP) of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, it has been determined tha�this project dces not occur near any habitat of sta[e-listed raze wildlife species nor contains any vemal pools. This Order is issued under the Massachusetts WeUands Protec6on Act,M.G.L. Chapter 131, Section 40 and the City of Salem Wedands Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1 —34-13. This Order pernuts the construcdon and installation of new piping, valve and slide gate at the Peabody Metering Chamber located along Hannony Grove Road on the Salem-Peabody line. The irnprovements include digging an approximately 8 foot wide trench to a depth of approximately 15 feet to install approximately 10 lineaz feet of 36 inch ductile iron pipe. In addition an approximately 8 foot wide trench will be excava[ed [o a depth of appro�cimately 15 feef so that a new valve and approximately 4 feet of new pipe can be installed. Work will also occur in the basement of the existing facility, however, this work will no[ result in any surface disturbance. The resource areas that will be affected during this project include [he 200 f Bordering Land Subject to Flooding. The proposed project will not resul�m a loss of flood s�to age azea. Once the work is completed the areas that were grass/lawn or pavement before the project will be returned to their original condition either grass or pavement The project will not result in an increase in impervious surfaces. A total of 160 square feet of Riverfront Area and BLSF will be impacted for the above referenced project. In order to prevent erosion, constrvction debris from entering the River haybales and silt fence will be installed prior to the start of the project and will remain in place throughout the construction. GENERAL COND[TIONS 1� This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its entirety (all 5 pages) at the Essex County Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the distric[in which the land is located, after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of[he issuance. A copy of the recording informa6on must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission before any work approved in this Order commences. Z• Approval of[his application dces not constitute compliance with any law or regulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Section 40, Wedands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wedands Protection Ordinance, Salem Code Chap[er 34, Section 34-1 —34-13. 3. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site plan(s). No alteration of weUand resource areas or associated buffer zones, other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property without prior approval from the Commission. 4• Prior to any work commencing, a sign shall be displayed showing DEP File#64-445, and not placed on a living Vee. j ' Attachment ro Order of Condiuons # 64-445 Page 2of 5 5. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeai period has lapsed from the date of the issuance of this Order. b• With respect to this Order, the Comtnission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers to act on its behalf in administering and enforcing this Order. Z The Commission or its Agent, officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at any ume for compliance with the conditions of this Order,[he Wetlands Protection Act MGL Chapter 131, Section 40,the Wetlands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00,and shall have the right to require any data or documentation that it deems necessary for that evaluation. 8. The term"ApplicanP'as used in [his Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner,any successor in interest or successor in control of the property referenced in the Notice of intent, supporting documents and this Order of Conditions. The Commission shall be notified in writing within 30 days of all transfers of title of any poRion of the property tha[takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of Compliance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal, state and local pemuts and approvals associated with this project. These permits may include bu[are not necessarily limi[ed to the following: (I) Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (P.L. 92-500, 86 stat. 816), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (Z) Water Quality Certification in accordance with the Federal Wa[er Pollution ConVol under authority of sec. 27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General Laws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Sewer Extension Pertnit from the DEP Division of Water Pollu[ion Control under G. L. Ch. 21A ss7 and 314 CMR 7.00. Any Board of Health permit for septic system design for any portion of the septic system within 100 feet of wetlands shall be submitted to the Commission prior to construction initiation. (4) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains under the S[ate Building Code(78p CMR 744.). 10. If there aze conflicting conditions within this Order, the stricter condition(s) shall rule. i l. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wetlands and surface waters during construction or after completion of the project. 12. The Commission or i[s Agent shall have the discretion to modify Ihe erosiot�/siltation control methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose additional conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or po[ential impacts resulting from the work herein permitted. 14. The work shall conform to the following at[ached plans and special conditions: Fina[Approved Plans Pea6od Meterin Chamber Im rovements: South Essex Sewera e District � (Title) Mazch 20 2007 (Dated) i Attachment to Ozdez of Conditions # 64-445 Page 3of 5 TMB (Sigrsed and Stamped by) Cit of Salem Conservation Commission (On file with) 15. Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s) or any deviation in construction from the approved plan(s)shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Project Chan�w;�h the Commission. The No[ice shall be accompanied by a writ[en inquiry pnor to their implementation in the field, as to whether the change(s) is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Inten[ or a request to correct or amend this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protection. 16. In conjunction with[he sale of this property or any portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued, the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the buyer that he/she is awaze of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. PffiOR TO CONSTRUCTION 17• Prior to the comm¢ncemeut of any activity ou tlus site other than activities listed above, there shall be a Pre-Construction Meeting between the project supervisor, the contractor responsible for the work, and a member of the Conservation Comrnission or its Administrator to ensure that the requirements of Ihe Order of Conditions are understood. The staked erosion control line shall be adjusted,if necessary, during the pre-consh-ucaon meeting. Please contact the Conservation Commission Agent at(978) 745-9595 ext 311 at least foRy-eight(48)hours prior to any activity to arrange for the preconstruction meeting. 18• Prior to the pre-cons[rucdon meeting and commencement of any activity on this site,�sedimenta4o�and erosion control barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Commission and/or its Administrator shall inspect and approve such installation at the pre-construction meeting. 19• No clearing of vegetapon, including Vees,or disturbance of soil shall occur prior to the pre-construction meeting. Minimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be al�owed prior to the pre- construc[ion meeting if absolutely necessary in order to place erosion control stakes where required. Z�• There shall be 10 hay bales and wooden stakes under cover on the site to be used only for emergency erosion control. EROSION CONTROL 21. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in the wedand azeas and buffer zones. The erosion control specifications provided in the Notice of Intent and the erosion control provision in the Order will be the minimum standards for this project the Commission may require additional measures. Z2. All debris, fill and excavated ma[erial shall be stockpiled a location far enough away from the wetland resource areas to prevent sediment from entering wedand resource areas. 23. Erosion and sedimentation conVol devices shall be inspected after each storm even[and repa'ued or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. � F � ' Attachment ro Ordec of Conditions # 64-445 ' Page 4of 5 24. The azea of consVuction shall remain in a stable condition at the ctose of each consWction day. 25. Any de-watering of Venches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as to prevent siltation of wedand resource areas. All dischazge from de-watering activities shall be filtered through hay bale sediment traps, silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. 26. Within thirty (30)days of completion of consvuction on any given portion of the project, all disturbed areas in [he completed portion of the site shall be permanently s[abilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover, using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed areas. 27. If soils aze to be disturbed for longer that two(2) mon[hs,a temporary cover of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentation. If the season is no[appropriate for plant growth, exposed surface shall be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures, firmly anchored, to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION 28. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s)approved in this Order shall be available on site at all times when work is in progress. 29. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond Ihe limit of work as defined by the siltation bazriers shown on the approved pla�(s). 30. All waste products,grubbed stumps,slash;construction materials,etc. shall be deposited at least 100 feet from wetfand resource azeas and 200 feet from river. 31. Cemen[trucks shall not be washed out in any wetland resource or buffer zone area,nor into any drainage system. Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or weUand resource azea shall be immediately removed. 32. All exposed sub-soils shall be covered by a minimum of three(3)inches of quality screened Ioam topsoil prior[o seeding and fmai stabilization. 33. Immediately following drainage structure installation all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,haybale barriers and/or silt bags to filter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system. 34. There shall be no pumping of water from wetland resource azeas. 35. All equipment shall be inspected regulazly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines,cylinders or any other components shall be fixed immediately. 36. During construction, ali drainage strucmres shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 37. The applicant is herby notified that failure to comply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement ac[ions by[he Conserva[ion Commission including,but not limited to,civil adminisVative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21A, section 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 38. Upon completion of construction and final soil stabilization, the applican[ shall submit the following to the Conservation Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance (COC): (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form (WpA Form 8A or other form if required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). , Attachment to Ozder of Condidons # 64-445 Page Sof 5 (2) A letter from a Registered Professionat Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions. (3) An "As-Built"plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor showing post�onshuction conditions within all azeas under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Wedands Protec6on Act This plan shall include a[a minim�m: (a) All wetland resource azea boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback azeas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Condifions; (b) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,structures and best management designs, including foundation drains,constructed under[his Order within any wedand resource azea or buffer zone; (c) Distances from any structures construc[ed under this Order to wedand resource areas- "strvctures"include, but aze not limited to,all buIldings,septic system components,wells, utility lines,fences,retaining walls,and roads/driveways; (d) A line delineating[he limit of work-"work"includes any filling,excavating ancUor disturbance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; 39. When issued, the Certificate of Compliance must be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the recording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. 40. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions, the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applican[shall firs[request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission, may the applicant request in writing a Certifica[e of Compliance as described above. 41. Erosion control devices shall remain in place and properly functioning unti] all exposed soils have been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Administrator has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 42. Applican[shall have an Licensed Site Professional on site during the excavation phases of the project. 43. Applicant shall entrench silt fence into soil [o prevent erosion as well as from migration of materials, debris, soil, etc from the project site into the North River or neazby catch basins. 44. Per the letter dated April 25, 2007 from Attomey Darling, see attached, the Commission requires that "because of[he presence of the coal and coal ash, any excess soils that cannot be used to fill in the excavation should be disposed of at a suitable off-site facility." 1 ' 5-1526-3-03 � � � � � � September 18, 2008 . -„ , , , ' Salem Conservation Commission 1Z0 Washington Street, 3'd Floor ' Salem, MA 01970 Re: Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements (MADEP File #64-445) ' Dear Members of the Commission: In accordance with Standard Condition 11 and General Condition 38 of the Order of ' Conditions (Order) for the above-referenced project, and on behalf of the South Essex Sewerage District (SESD), we are requesting a Certificate of Compiiance from the Salem Conservation Commission (Commission) for the completed work. A copy of WPA Form 8A ' Request for Certificate of Compliance is provided in Appendix A and a copy of the Order of Conditions is in Appendix B. � Project Background The project involved infrastructure improvements to the existing Peabody Metering Station ' to address flow monitoring accuracy and sampling concerns identified by the SESD at the. project location. As the Commission may recall, the subject parcei and proposed activities span the Salem-Peabody municipal boundary. Portions of the project occurred in Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (BLSF) and the 100-foot Buffer Zone of inland Bank (i.e. the North ' River canal). Work also occurred within 200 feet of the North River canal. However, the activities were exempted from the Riverfront Area requirements per 310 CMR 10.58(6)(h). As such, a Notice of Intent (NOI) was prepared and submitted to the Commission in March ' Z007. The Commission issued the Order on May 10, 2007. ' Regulatory Compliance Tighe & Bond has prepared Record Drawings of the construction activity based on our field observations and information provided by the SESD and their contractor, J. D'Amico of , Randoiph, Massachusetts. A brief project timeline and summary of activities is provided below. • August 2007 - The Order of Conditions was recorded at the Essex County Registry of � Deeds on August 16, 2007 in Book 27111, Page 189. A copy of this document is provided in Appendix B. • September 2007 through May 2008 - Construction activities. Construction ' monitoring was performed by the District and Tighe & Bond, Inc. Photographs of the site during construction activities are provided in Appendix C. . September Z008 - Tighe & Bond prepared Record Drawings of post-construction site i � conditions. Copies of the drawings, sheets 1 through 6, are provided in Appendix D. Photographs of the site following the completion of construction are provided in I Appendix C. � It is Tighe & Bond's opinion that the overall intent of the performance standards within the Act have been satisfied. ' ' As presented herein, SESD has generally completed this project in a manner consistent with the statutory interests of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and the City of Salem's ' S3 Southampton Road • Westfield, MA 01085 • Tel 413.562.1600 • Fax 413.562.5317 � ' ' Code of Ordinances, Chapter 50, Wetlands Protection and Conservation. If the Commission wishes to perform a site inspection or has any questions, please contact Melissa Coady at � 413-572-3224 or me at 413-572-3233. Very truly yours, ' TIGHE & BOND, INC. CC��,�-�=� � ' ��("��'�''f-- ' David J. Popielarczyk, P.E. Senior Project Engineer ' Enclosures Copy: Harold Newhall, South Essex Sewerage District (w/encl) ' Alan Taubert, Jr., P.E., South Essex Sewerage District (w/encl) John E. Dariing, Esq., Serafini, Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP (w/encl) � 7:\5\5152fi\PERMITS\SHLEM\RCoQcoverlettecdoc , � , ' ' ' I ' ' , � I ' � ' ' Z - • " i : • • ' � .,. .� ' ` ,..� � , I ,- � A � � � , ,�� E� � � �1 �� i � �� I � <<. � � .%,x � ��'j�C,�F K S '.: . —I �r�V e�v�q� ., . � � �, �Cx El��.�1'�� - , I \ '� v.9 '�u�-.+� 5� I_ +� •� \w�,i� . 5„v 'a d �= '��..T .: -.,:., . ��;. . 1- ry .� :.,�.� . I I �_ � 1 I II \ I � � L � 1 I I�, � �i ^ i t ' � 1 I_! _- �. ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands DEP File Number: ' ` WPA Form 8A — Request for Certificate of Compliance 64-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Provided by DEP � A. Project Information � Important: when filling out �• This request is being made by: forms on the Harold Newhall, South Essex Seweraqe District I computer, use Name ' only the tab key to move 50 Fort Avenue, PO Box 989 yourcursor- MailingAddress do not use the Salem MA 01970 � ' return key. � Ciry/Town State Zip Code y�� 978-744-4550 e� Phone Number ' � 2. This request is in reference to work regulated by a final Order of Conditions issued to: """' South Essex Sewerage District ApPlicant � May 10, 2007 64-445 Dated DEP File Number Upon completion 3. The ro ect site is located at: , of the work P 1 authorized in Harmony Grove Road Salem an Order of Street Address � Conditions,the Cityliown properry owner , Map 16 Parcel 240 , mUst request a Assessors Map/Plat Number Parcel/Lot Number Certificate of 4. The fi�al Order of Conditions was recorded at the Re ist of Deeds for: Compliance 9 ry , from the issuing authority stating property Owner(rf different) that the work or Essex 3462 538 poRion of the � work has been County Book . Page satisfactorily Completed. Certificate(if registered land) � 5. This request is for certification that(check one): � the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorilycompleted. ' ❑ the following portions of the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed (use additional paper if necessary). ' ' ' ' ❑ the above-referenced Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid, and the work regulated by it was never started. , wpatortnBa.Eoc^rev.7/13/04 Pa9e 1 W 2 ' ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � � DEP File Number. � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands ' WPA Form 8A — Request for Certificate of Compliance sa-aas Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Provided by DEP , A. Project Information (cont.) � 6. Did the Order of Conditions for this project, or the portion of the project subject to this request, contain an approval of any plans stamped by a registered professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land surveyor? ' � Yes If yes, attach a written statement by such a professional certifying substantial compliance with the plans and describing what deviation, if any, exists from the plans , approved in the Order. ❑ No ' B. Submittal Requirements tRequests for Certificates of Compliance should be directed to the issuing authority that issued the final Order of Conditions (OOC). If the project received an OOC from the Conservation Commission, submit this request to that Commission. If the project was issued a Superseding Order of Conditions or was the , subject of an Adjudicatory Hearing Final Decision, submit this request to the appropriate DEP Regional Office (see htto://www.mass.qov/dep/abouUreqion/findvour htm). ' � , ' ' , t � � wpaformBa.tlac••rev.7/13/04 Page 2 W 2 � I�� .r,ry.,,-U:�' .,�.�,,.� � . ! ^'i.r,�, ' .a � �y 4 e"nF •^._ . I � #� � Z s"s v� . , „,.. � ^`W'� .�Y.� ' V�� ..r'M" �"q�..��'.�,e � uha�il� �� .... ��21k � ,y„�,Anir�Y{w��...-'. \ � ,c„ ` R �} ' '"�, �v, �a`^,. r.4; r , �' °'�' , �. � ` "s � J � R "� A �Y � 4�� . . _ � �h { � � 1WAf� . �:�� f ' �i� i . .. :.� �i: .. `�� . I � , �� ` � ; � � � � �� : i ,, r `�4'� B � ��.. . � "�"`�� a'rtM� � , � �#^� . ;�� :,�� ' ` r .;�s -� � �. t � � �� ; �� `"r` .�,� - y . ' �, . . � � � � � �. , , I_ � � '�r,� � F� �� I � � I i >'y"'��.' � ,� � * �� i i "�" _ �* � A' 1 � _ � "�.d�� y--, ' r ' r . r : �_ I �� l_ � I � ' � - !__ i �./ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bur�au bi Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number: �� ' � WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 A. General information IIIIIII��II�IIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ; �mPorte�t: From: sa�em 2007082600407 Bk:27111 Pg;1B9 . Whenfilling 1.ConservatlonCommission z4:ao 0TI{ERPp �/�g � ou[fortns on the computer, 2.This issuance is for(check one): a. � Order of Conditions b. ❑ Amended Order of Conditions use oniy the tab key to 3.To: Applicant: move your cursor-do not Harold Newhall South Essex Sewerape District use the�etum a.Frst Name b.Last Narne c.Company � key. 50 Fort Avenue, PO Box 989 � d.Ma�ling Address � `� Salem MA 01970 � e.Ciry?own f.State . g.Zip Code .. . � � a. Property Owner(if different from applicant): a.Frst Name b.Last Name a Company -- � �""-�-" d.MailmgAddress . � . �� e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code „ s. Project Location: Harmony Grove Road Salem a.Street Address � b.Ciryffovm � , � . Map 16 Parcel 240 c.Assessors Map/Plet Number d.ParceVLot Number � . Latitude and Longitude, if known (note: 42 31'27.52° -70 55'3.04" electronic filers will click for GIS locator): e.ta�tuae f.tonAaude s. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for(attach additionai information 'rf more than one parcel): Essex a.County b.Certifi53t$e(If registered land) 3462 � � � c.Book d.Page � � �� z Dates: March 28, 2007 April 26,2007 MaY 10,2007 a.Date Notice of Intent Fled b.Date Publ�Hearing Closed c.Date of Issuance a. Final Approved Plans and Other pocuments(attach additional plan or document references as neede�: Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements:South Essex Seweraqe District a.Piar,rma TMF b.Prepared By c.Signed and Stemped by March 20,2007 varies for each detailed drawinp d.Flnel Re�rislon Date e.Scele . f.Additlonel Plan or pocument Tille g.Date � REturn to: John E. Darling, Esq. SSD&C' 63 Federal Stieet Salem, MA 01970 wpmonrs.aoc•rev.3H/as � Papa 1 of 9 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection i � DEP File Number: Bureau ef Resource Protection -Wetlands ` WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 ' Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings � t Findings pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act: Foliowing the review of the above-referenced Notice of Intent and based on the information provided � in this application and presented at the public hearing,this Commission finds that the areas in which work is proposed is significant to the following interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Check all that apply: , a. � Public Water Supply b. ❑ Land Containing Shelifish c. � Prevention of Poilution d. � Private Water Supply e. � Fisheries f. � Protection of Wildlife � Habitat q. � Groundwater Supply n. � Storm Damage Prevention t. � Flood Control 2 This Commission hereby finds the project,as proposed,is:(check one of the following boxes) ' Approved subject to: a. � the following conditions which are necessary in accordance with the performance standards set � forth in the wetiands regulations.This Commission orders that ali work shall be pertormed in accordance with the Notice of Intent referenced above,the following Generai Conditions, and any other special conditions attached to this Order.To the extent thaf the following conditions modify o� , differ from the plans,specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,these conditions shall controL Denied because: ` � t. ❑ the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the performance standards set forth in the wetland regulations.Therefore,work on this project may not go forward unless and until a new Notice of Intent is submitted which provides measures which are adequate to protect these interests,and a , final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the pertormance standards which the proposed work cannot meet is attached to this Order. c. ❑ the information submitted by the applicant is not sufficient to describe the site,the work,or the , effect of the work on the interests identified in the Wetlands Protection Act.Therefore,work on this project may not go fonvard unless and until a revised Notice of Intent is submitted which provides sufficient information and includes measures which are adequate to protect the AcYs interests,and a final Order of Conditions is issued. A description of the specific information which is lacking and , why k is necessary is attached to this Order as per 310 CMR 10.05(6)(c). Inland Resource Area Impacts: Check all that apply below. (For Approvals Only) s. ❑ Buffer Zone Impacts:Shortest dfstance between limlt of project dlsturbance and ' wetland boundary(if available) a.iinearfeet Resource Area Proposed Permitted Proposed Permitted Alteration Alteration Replacement Replacement ' a. ❑ Bank s.linearfeet b.linearteet c.iinearfeet d.linearfeet s. ❑ Bordering Vegetated � � W 8tl2lld a.square teet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet s. ❑ Land Under Waterbodies a.square feet b.square feet c.square feet d.square feet and Watenvays ' e.cu.yd dredged f.cu.yd dredged wpalam5.tlx•rev.3�1N5 Pepe 2 oi 9 ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau ef Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number: � ' WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions �-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 B. Findings (cont.) Resource Area Proposed Pertnitted Proposed Permitted Alteration AReration Replacement Replacement �. � Bordering Land 760 �so SUbjeCt to Flooding a.square feet b.square feet c.squere feet d.square fest Cubic Feet Flood Storage e.cubic feat f.cubic teet g.cubic feet h.cubic feet e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding a.square feet b.squere feet Cubic Feet Fiood Storage c.cubic feet d.cubic feet � e.cubic feat f.cubic feet � e. � Rivertront area 160 �so � a.totfll sq.feet b.total sq.feet � � 160 tso ` Sq ft within 100 ft c.square feet d.square feet e.square feet t.square feet Sq ft between 100-200 ft � o g.square feet h.square feet �( �� i,square Teet j.square feet - ' � Coastal Resource Area impacts: Check all that apply below. (For,4pprovals Only) io. ❑ Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below �i. ❑ Land Under the Ocean a,square feec b.square feet . � � c.cu.yd dredged d.cu.yd dretlged -. �- iz. ❑ Barrier 8eaches Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes below ia. ❑ Coastal Beaches a.square feet b.square feet c.c/y nourishmt � d.cy nourishmt �a. ❑ Coastal Dunes a.squere feet b.square feet c.cly nourishmt d.c/y nourishm[ is. ❑ CoastalBanks aiinearfeet b.Iinearfeet - - is. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores a,square feet b.square fee� n. ❑ Salt Marshes —.- . e.squere feet b.square feet c.square teet d.square feet �a. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds a.square fest b.square feet c.cu.yd dredged d.cu.yd dredged � � �s. ❑ Land Containing Sh211fI5h a.square feet b.square teet c.square feet d.square feet �" � 20. ❑ Fish Runs Indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank,Land Under the Ocean, and/or iniand Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, above a cu.yd dredged b.cu.yd dredged 2i. ❑ Land Subject to Coastai Storm Flowage a.square feet b.square feet wpatorm5.eoc•rev.a/1Ns � Pepe 3 of s Massacfiusetts Department of Environmental Protectlon ' � Bureau ef Resource Protection -Wetlands �EP Fiie tvumber. ` WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions s4-a�5 � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act ' (only appiicable to approved projects) 1. Faflure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory � measures,shall be deemed cause to revoke or motlify this Order. 2. The Order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any ' injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This Order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all � other applicable federal, state, or iocal statutes,ordinances, bylaws, or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereundev shall be completed within three years from the date of this Order unless either of the following apply: ' a. the work is a maintenance dredging project as provided for in the Act; or - b. the time for completion has been extended to a specified date more than three years, but less _. than five years,from the date of(ssuance. If this Order is intended to be valid for more than three„ years,the wctension date and the special circumstances wartanting the extended time period are � set forth as a special condition in this Order. 5. This Order may be extended by The issuing authority for one or more periods of up to three years each upon appiication to the issuing authority at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the Order. 6. Any fill used in connection with this project shail be clean fill.Any;fill shalt contain no trash, refuse, ,, . rubbish, or debris, including buf not iimited to lumber,bricks, piaster,wire, lath, paper,cardboard, pipe,tires,ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles,or parts of any of the foregoing. 7. This Order is not final untii all administrative appeal periods from this Order have elapsed, or'rf such an appeal has been taken, untii all proceedings before the Department have been completed. S. No work shall be undertaken until the Order has become final and ihen has been recorded In the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located,within the chain of title of the affected property. In the case of recorded land,the Fnal Order shall also be noted in the Registry's Grantor Index under the name of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is to be done. In the case of the registered land,the Final Order shall also be noted on the Land Court Cert'rficate of Title of the owner of the land upon which the proposed work is done.The recording information shall be submitted to this Conservation Commission on the form at the end of this Order, which form must be stamped by the Registry of Deeds, prior to the commencement of work. 9. A sign shall be dispiayed at the site not less then rivo square feet or more than three square feet in size bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection"[or,"MA DEP"J °File Number ��5 � wpaform5.dx• rev.3/1/OS Pope4M9 \ Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DEP File Number: � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions sa-�45 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 C. General Conditions Under Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act 10. Where the Department of Environmental Protection is requested to issue a Superseding Order,the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before DEP. 11. Upon completion of the work described hereln,the applicant shall submit a Request for Certificate of Compliance(W PA Form 8A)to the Conservation Commission. 12. The work shall conform to the plans and special conditions referenced in this order. 13. Any change to the plans identified in Condition #12 above shall require the applicant to inquire of the Conservation Commission in writing whether the change is significant enough to require the filing of a new Notice of Intent. 74. The Agent or members of the Conservation Commission and the Department of Environmental Protection shall have the right to enter and inspect the area subject to this Order at reasonable hours to evaluate compiiance with the conditions stated in this Order,and may require the submittal of any data deemed necessary by the Conservation Commission or Department for that evaluation. 15. This Order of Conditions shail appiy to any successor in interest or successor in control of the property subject to this Order and to any contractor or other person performing work conditioned by this Order. 16. Prior to the start of work, and if the project involves work adjacent to a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, the boundary of the wetland in the vicinity of the proposed work area shall be marked by wooden stakes or flagging.Once in place,the wetland boundary markers shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance has been issued by the Conservation Commission. 17. All sedimentation barriers shail be maintained in good repair until all disturbed areas have been fuliy stabilized with vegetation or other means.At no time shall sediments be deposited in a wetland or water body. During construction,the applicant or his/her designee shall inspect the erosion controls on a daily basis and shall remove accumulated sediments as needed.The appiicant shali immediately control any erosion problems that occur at the site and shall also immediately notify the Conservation Commission,which reserves the right to require additionai erosion and/or damage prevention controls it may deem necessary. Sedimentation barriers shall serve as the limit of work unless another limit of work line has been approved by this Order. 18. Ail work associated with this Order is required to comply with the Massachusetts Stormwater Policy Standards. Special Conditions: If you need more . spacefor addiUonal conditiors, select box to attech a te# document � "' w�o�s.a�• re�.snros reuesas Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ' � Bureau af Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number. ` WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 Massachusetts Wetiands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 � D. Findings Under Municipal Wetlands Bylaw or Ordinance ' i. Is a municipal wetlands bylaw or ordinance applicable? � Yes ❑ No 2. The hereby finds(check one that applies): ' Conservation Commission a. ❑ that the proposed work cannot be conditioned to meet the standards set forth in a municipal ordinance or bylaw specifically: � e.Municipal Ordinence or Bylaw b.Ckation Therefore,work on thls project may not go fonvard unless and until a revised Plotice of Intent is � submitted which provides measures which are adequate to meet these standards,and a final Order of Conditions is issued. a. ❑ that the following additional conditions are necessary to comply with a municipal ordinance or ' bylaw: - �� - a.Municipal Ordinance or Bylaw . � - . - ' � b.Citation � The Commission orders that all work shail be pertormed in accordance wiTh the following conditions , and with the Notice of Intent referenced above.To the extent that the foliowing conditions modify or differ from the plans,specifications, or other proposals submitted with the Notice of Intent,the wnditions shall controL if you need more c. The special conditions relating to municipal ordinance or bylaw are as foilows: � spacefor . . - adamona� The special conditions attached to this Order of Conditions relate-to both the CiTy of Salem's local condiuons, ordinance and the Massachusetts Wetiands Protection Act Se�ecc box,o _� attach a text � document � � - � � - -� � � ' ' � '. � ' w�o�s.ax•re�.snms vaaasm9 ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau nf Resource Protection -Wetiands oEP File Number. WPA Form 5 - Order of Conditions 64-445 Massachusetts Wetlands Protectio n Act M.G.L. c. 131, 40 § E. Issuance This Order is valid for three years, unless otherwise spec'rfied as a special �� condition pursuant to General Conditions#4,from the date of issuance. �.oa�e f issuance Please indicate the number of inembers who will sign this form: This Order must be signed by a majoriry of the Conservation Commission. z.Number w siy ers � The Order must be maiied by certified mail (return receipt requested) or hand delivered to the applicant. A � copy also must be mailed or hand delivered at the same time to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection Regional Office, if not fiiing electronically, and the property owner, if different from applicant. Signatures: " �� n � d ; �„a � O � �- /_J ��.,--�-°� _ _ , Notary Ac�Cnawledgement Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex On this 26 of April 2007 Day Month Year � - Before me,the undersigned Notary Public, K.Cornacchio, D. Pabich, M. Blier, D. Summer, personally appeared A. Hamilton,and K. Glidden proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which was/were personally known Dascrlption of evldence of identificafion � � to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document,and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntari�y for its stated purpose. As member of Salem �nservation Commission Cirylfown ��,�.� l �� „` �� Sig ature o Notary Public Carey R. uques � Printed Name of Notary Public Place notary seal and/or any sfamp above August 16,2013 _ My Commission E�ires(Date) This Order is issued to the applicant as follows: ❑ by hand delivery on � by certified mail, retum receipt requested,on �� Date Date v.yalom5.tloc•rev.ylNS Pape7ot9 � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection , � Burgau of Resource Protection -Wetlands �EP Fiie Number: WPA Form 5 — Order of Conditions 64-aa5 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 F. Appeals The applicant,the owner, any person aggrieved by this Order,any owner of land abutting the land subject to this Order, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby not'rfied of their right to request the appropriate DEP Regional Office to issue a Superseding Order of Condftions. The request must be made by cert'rf(ed mail or hand delivery to the Department, with the appropriate filing fee and a completed Request of Departmental Action Fee Transmittal Form,as provided in 310 CMR 10.03(�within ten business days from the date of issuance of this Order. A copy of the request shall at the same time be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the Conservation Commission and to the applicant, if he/she is not the appellant.Any appellants seeking to appeal the DepartmenYs Superseding Order associated with this appeal will be required to demonstrate prior participation in the review of this project. Previous participation in the permit proceeding means the submission of written information to the Conservation Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, requesting a Superseding Order or Determination, or providing written information to the Department prior to issuance of a Superseding Order or Determination. The request shall state clearly and concisely the objections to the Order which is being appealed and how the Order does not Contribute to the protection of the interesfs identified in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, (M.G.L, c. 131, §40)and is inconsistent with the wetlands regulations(310 CMR 10.00). To the extent that the Order is based on a municipal ordinance or bylaw, and not on the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act or regulations,the Department has rio appeliate jurisdiction. _ ... , . ' ' Section G, Recording Information Is available on the following page. ' 1 � ' , � � wpelomS.Coc.rev.3fIA5 ' PapeBoi9 , Attachment to Otdec of Condirions#64-445 , " Page 1of 5 SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEP FILE #64-445 Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements South Essex Sewecage District Harmony Gcove Road City of Salem,Massachusetts ADDITIONAL FINDINGS Based on the Estimated Habifnts or Rare Wildlife and Certified Vemal Pools Map (June 1, 2A03) from Naturel Heritage &Endangeced Species Program(NHESP) of the Massachusetts Division of F'isheries and Wildlife, it has been determined that this project dces no[occur neaz any habitat of state-listed rare wildlife species nor conYains any vemal pools. This Order is issued under the Massachusetts Wedands Protection Act,M.G.L.CLapter 131,Section 40 and the City of Salem WeUands Protecfion Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1—3413. This Order permits the construcflon and installafion of new piping, valve and slide gate at Ute Peabody Me[ering Chamber located along Hannony Grove Road on the Salem-Peabody line. The improvements include digging an approximately 8 foot wide uench to a depth of approxunately 15 feet to install approximately 10 linear feet of 36 inch ductile iron pipe. In addition an approximately 8 foot wide uench will be excavated to a depth of approximately 15 feei so that a new valve and approximately 4 feet of new pipe can be installed. Work will also occur in the basement of the existing facility, however, this work will not result in any surface disturbance. The resource areas that will be affected during this project include the 200 foot Riverhont Area of the North River and Bordering Land Subject to Flooding. The proposed project will not result in a loss of flood storage azea. Once the work is completed the azeas that were grass/lawn or pavement before the project will be returned to theu.original condition either grass or pavemenk The project will no[result in an increase in impervious surfaces. A total of 160 square feet of Riverfront Area and BISF will be impacted for the above referenced project In order to prevent erosion,construcRon debris from entering the River haybales and silt fence will be installed prior[o the stazt of the project and will remain in place throughout the construction. I GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. This Order of Conditions must be recorded in its enfirety(all 5 pages)at the Essex Coun[y Registry of i Deeds or the Land Coud for the district in which the land is located,after the expiration of the 10-day appeal period and within 30 days of the issuance. A copy of the recording information must be submitted to the Salem Conservation Comnussion before any work approved in this Order commences. 2. Approval of this application does not consritute compliance with any law or cegulation other than M.G.L Chapter 131, Secdon 40,Wedands Regulations 310 CMR 10.00 and the City of Salem Wetlands Pro[ecfion Ordinance,Salem Code Chapter 34,Section 34-1—3413. 3. All work shall be performed in accordance with this Order of Conditions and approved site pian(s). No alteration of wedand resource areas or associated buffer zones,other than that approved in this Order, shall occur on this property wi[hout prior approval from the Commission. 4. Prior to any work commencing,a sign shall be displayed showing DEP File#64-445,and not placed on a living tree. Attachment to Oxder of Condiuons# G4-445 � , .. Page 2of 5 . ' 5. No work approved in this Order may commence until the ten(10)day appeal period has lapsed from the ' date of the issuance of this Order. 6. With respect to this Order,the Commission designates the Conservation Agent as its agent with powers , to act on its behalf in administering and enforoing tlus Order. 7. The Commission or its Agent,officers,or employees shall have the right to enter and inspect the property at any time for compliance with the conditions of this Order,the Wetlands Protecaon Act MGL Chapter 131, ' Section 40,the Wetlands Regulations 310 CIvIIt 10.00,and shall have the right to require any data or documentauon that it deems necessary for that evaluation. 8. The term"Applicant"as used in this Order of Conditions shall refer to the owner,any successor in � intetest or successot in control of the property referenced in the Notice of in[ent,supporting documents and this Order of Co�ditions. The Coaunission shall be no6fied in wridng within 30 days of all transfers of title of any portion of the property that takes place prior to issuance of the Certificate of ' Compliance. . 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to procure all other applicable federal,state and local pernuts and � approvals associated with this project. These pernuts may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: (1) Section 404 of the Federa]Water Pollution Control Act(P.L. 92-500;86 stat. 816),U.S.Army , Corps of Engineers. (2) Watet Quality Certification in acwrdance with the Federal Water Pollution Control under authority of sec. 27(5)of Chapter 21 of the Massachusetts General I.aws as codified in 314 CMR 9.00. (3) Sewer Extension Permit from the DEP Division of Water Polluflon Control under G.L. Ch. 21A ss7 and 314 CMIZ 7.00. Any Board of Heaith pernrit for septic system design for any portion of the septic system within 100 feet of wedands shall be submitted to the Commission prior to construction initiation. (4) Design Requirements for Construction in Floodplains under the State Building Code(780 CMR 744.). 10. If there aze conflicting conditions within this Order,the stricter condition(s)shall rule. 11. All work shall be performed so as to ensure that there will be no sedimentation into wedands and surface waters during construcuon or after compledon of the"project. 12. The Commission or its Agent shall have the discre6on to modify the erosion/siltation controt methods and boundary during construction if necessary. 13. The Commission reserves the right to impose addidonal conditions on portions of this project or this site to mitigate any actual or potential impacts resulting from the work herein pemutted. 14. The work shall conform to the following attached plans and special conditions: Final Approved Plans Peabody Metering,Chamber Im�rovements: South Essex Sewerage District (Title) March 20 2007 (Dated) Attachment to Otdex of Conditions#64445 ', " Page 3of 5 TMB (Signed and Stamped by) _..._...,.---.- City of Salem Conservation Commission (On file witk) . _ 15. Any proposed changes in the approved plan(s)or any deviafion in construcdon from the approved plan(s)shall require the applicant to file a Notice of Proiect Chanee with the Commission. The Nouce shall be accompanied by a written inquiry prior to their implementation in the field,as to whether the change(s)is substantial enough to require filing a new Notice of Intent or a request to correct or amend this Order of Conditions. A copy of such request shall at the same time be sent to the Department of Environmental Protecuon. 16. In conjunction with the sale of this property or auy portion thereof before a Certificate of Compliance has been issued,the applicant or current landowner shall submit to the Commission a statement signed by the buyer that he/she is awaze of an outstanding Order of Condifions on the property and has received a copy of the Order of Conditions. . PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 17. Prior to the commencement of any activity on this site other than activities listed above,there shall be a Pre-Construction Meefing between the project supervisor,tlie contractor responsible for;the work,and a member of the Conservation Commission or its Adnilnis[rator to ensure that the requirements of the Order of CondiGons are understood. The staked erosion control line shall be adjusted,if necessary,during ihe pre-construction meeting. Please contact the Conservation Commission Agent at(978)745-9595 ext 311 at leas[forty-eight(48)hours prior to any ac6vity to arrange for the pre-construction meeting. . 18. Prior to the pre-construcfion meeting and commencement of any activity on ttris site,sedimentadon and erosion con�ol barriers shall be installed as shown on the approval plan(s)and detail drawings. The Coaunission and/or its Administrator shall inspect aud approve such installafion at the pre-construction meeting. 19. No clearing of vegetarion,including trees,or dishubance of soil shall occur prior to the preconswction meeting. Nfinimal disturbance of shrubs and herbaceous plants shall be allowed prior to the pre- construction meeting if absolutely necessary in otder to place erosion control stakes where required. 20. There shall be 10 hay bales and wooden stakes under cover on the site to be used only for emergency erosion control. EROSION CONTROL 21. Appropriate erosion control devices shall be in place prior to the beginning of any phase of construction, and shall be maintained during construction in the wefland areas and buffer zones. The erosion control specifications provided in the Notice of Intent and the erosion control provision in the Order will be the minimum standazds for this project;the Commission may require additional measures. 22. All debris,fill and excavated material shall be stockpiled a locarion faz enough away from the wetland resource azeas to prevent sediment from entering wetland resource azeas. 23. Erosion and sedimentation conh-ol devices shall be inspected after each storm event and repaired or replaced as necessary. Any accumulated silt adjacent to the barriers shall be removed. � Attachment to Otdec of Conditions# 64445 , . .. Page 4of 5 ' ?A. The area of construction shall remain in a stable condition at the close of each construcaon day. 25. Any de-watering of trenches or other excavation required during construction shall be conducted so as � to prevent siltation of wetland resource azeas. All discharge from de-watering activities shall be filtered through hay bale sediment traps, silt filter bags or other means approved by the Commission or its Administrator. ' 26. . Wi[hin thiRy(30)days of completion of construction on any given portion of the project,all disturbed azeas in the completed portion of the site shall be permane�t]y stabilized with rapidly growing vegetative cover,using sufficient top soil to assure long-term stabilization of disturbed azeas. ' 27. If soIls aze to be disturbed for longer that two(2)months,a temporary cpver of rye or other grass should be established to prevent erosion and sedimentadon. If the season is not appropriate for plant growth, , exposed surface shal]be stabilized by other appropriate erosion control measures,firnily anchored,to prevent soils from being washed by rain or flooding. DURING CONSTRUCTION ' 28. A copy of this Order of Conditions and the plan(s)approved in this Order shall be available on site at all , times when work is in progress. 29. No alteration or activity shall occur beyond the limit of work as defined by the siltation bazriers shown on the approved plan(s). 30:` All waste products,grubbed stumps,slash;construcfion materials,e[c.shall be deposited at least !00 feet from wetland resource areas and 200 feet from river. 31. Cement trucks shail not be washed out in any wetland resoune or buffer zone azea,nor into any drainage system Any deposit of cement or concrete products into a buffer zone or wedand resource azea shall be immediately removed. 32. All exposed sub-soils shall be covered by a minimum of three(3)inches of quality screened loam topsoil priot to seeding and final stabilization. 33. Immediately following drainage structure installadon all inlets shall be protected by silt fence,haybale barriers and/or silt bags to fi]ter silt from stormwater before it enters the drainage system 34. There shall be no pumping of water frnm wetland resource areas. 35. All equipment shall be inspected regularly for leaks. Any leaking hydraulic lines,cylinders or any other components shall be fixed immediately. 36. During construction,all drainage strucdues shall be inspected regularly and cleaned as necessary. 37. The applicant is herby notified that failure to mmply with all requirements herein may result in the issuance of enforcement ac6ons by the Conserva6on Commission including,but not limited to,civil administrative penalties under M.G.L Chapter 21A,section 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 38. Upon completion of conswction and final soil stabilization,the applicant shall submit the following to the Conservation Commission to request a Certificate of Compliance(COC): (1) A Completed Request for a Certificate of Compliance form(WPA Form 8A or other fonn if required by the Conservation Commission at the time of request). � Attachment to Otdes of Coadiaons#64-445 � •• Page Sof 5 (2) A letter from a Registered Professional Engineer certifying compliance of the property with this Order of Conditions. (3) An"As-Built"plan signed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer or L,and Surveyor showing post-construction condi6ons within all azeas under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Wedands Protection Act. TEris plan shal[inciude at a minimum: (a) All wetland resource area boundaries with associated buffer zones and regulatory setback azeas taken from the plan(s)approved in this Order of Conditions; @) Locations and elevations of all stormwater management conveyances,s7uctures and best managemen[designs,including foundation drains,constructed under this Orda within any wedand resource area or buffer zone; (c) Distances from any structures constructed under this Order to wedand resource azeas- "shuctures"include,but aze not limited to,all buildings,septic system components,wells, utility lines,fences,retaining walls,and roads/driveways; (d) A]ine delineating the limit of work-"work"includes any filling,excavating and/or dishubance of soils or vegetation approved under this Order; 39. When issued;the Certificate of Compliance mus[be recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and a copy of the ruording submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. 40. If the completed work differs from that in the original plans and conditions,the report must specify how the work differs; at which time the applicant shall first request a modification to the Order. Only upon review and approval by the Commission, may the applicant request in writing a Certificate of Compliance as described above. 41. Erosion contro]devices shall remain in place and propedy functioning unGl all exposed soils ttave been stabilized with final vegetative cover and the Conservation Commission and/or its Administrator has authorized their removal. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 42: Applicant shall have an Licensed Site Professional on site during the excavation phases of the project. 43. Applicant shall entrench silt fence into soil to prevent erosion as well as from migration of materials, debris, soil,etc from the project site inio the North River or neazby catch basins. 44. Per the letter dated Apri125,2007 from Attorney Darling,see attached,the Commission requires that "because of the presence of the coal and coal ash,any excess soils that cannot be used to fill in the excavation should be disposed of at a suitable off-site facility." ---- -- _. -- -. _ ___ ___ _____. -- _ - - - . — � � i � ; � � � - - - , - � � , , : � � � � � _ i . ' _ ! � _ + ; � i � __ , �;. , �� P �� "�+:fa ,� r L} �� j��"A, �i i� * ��. '�" Y ��A � ' .., � ,� 33��'�..-� �`��.Y€"'u' ��`�k��'�"'��.^�+, :x - .�i . ,tiM`c , � � 'n+X" ^e ,.. Yg�� i"V�`��k 4 � ,� L.�y� �� t� `k.Y�.2} IA�` :A xf� 'zT.$�. � �� r� � y�n, M SAh��, ��``�5 hl�� y il\ y .:%.� '4��+.V � t }� � � �� 4� i s �� s�„y�?�r.�� '��.;. yf � � +�`�tF,R Y � " � y �lri M �� y � a 8. 2�+` � _ , y+a � � ��' °Y� ,� �� .�. 3 � `¢ r y� t.q,�j,'�#� � g ''�"�'"> y:�+ '"'`�i ,�,°� � �. �t..$, ,„� � �, �# �..�� >'+�w. a', �} �� ,;' � , '"'� �a` '�a�y^•. � ,'Jf� pyc�� 4 >� 7'+ r � �; � w#� �,�t� l.�a�a'.�'� �S' n � S ir s �i �� °�y5��^,� 1 e � ��., tt# � '�.�. �'4� �t�a� � 7..� �� I ;� , ��t+i ♦ ww'+�^ .+ r `"`i �� '��4 �� y„ . � ��Y �M *� �L� .,y.� C` l-� y � ��y�7 '�' .-b/�� `4 I � �v'3�. �eT � �;{ {.�` y t� h � . Y 4 ' .� rcaAx�l��J�Y '£ �'�� "'y ^`�' �T',�+$�� kx� . ln�p, : � 'fi � �w� }%��'}f��'.�°� �y �iy "4 v � ,�r, ._ � ��rl' p f � e � ao �� _ .� �, v. � � � p � �� _ __� _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � n � SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ' I PEABODY METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS Tighe&Bond , � , � � �_ ,. �« . �� . a*. ��` � ....: �. ,..,.__ ' .�*� , � � - T ... �.., �. �'.. � `r""`_ � y �fY�j�`r � f p : r . , . "'r:.�. h' � .. i . .. .. .._._--.-- ._.._ �a �.. r . ' ` �- .. .�" �.,—'�i�'_ 4 � »�w,trn'�"�°"(, ,,��-.";� s, .' ., � �� ^s �' _ . 4„_ '�I M°,'1;.< ��x ��`� � � SydR�q �w .P 4 ` x . � ��.��: � 'yy b � , A ;.y}r i � j°k,`'.. : ,,k'sP�.r'�,1. �I ' Photo 1 Temporary cover at station excavation (mid-construction). ' . ...' ' _.�.� . .,r--�:.�.,_ . .__ . . � ... . � +w... � � . . � ' � ^� ' • 5�� . �` I ^ ' y '_ ,. ._�t 5� ' . � ::m . � . � . . . . . �.y-._. ' � ,a' . F �a , ' �� ' . . }':�� ` #, � 5 � � � �� - ,. } ��. "�-u"�', . '. °.+U- .,:� . Photo 2 Restoration at station excavation (post-construction) 1 ' . . . • - : : . . , ....., . .. . , ,. �;� �. � . ;, 0�1, ; c� , � / � �, � u n r t ls: , �1�, ; �t�� '' - `k' ' � �� .1�i �-' 1�°. �t c'�x ��d aa �� •" t � -�,� �.i.� ` �� ,_ .. �e :. Cf � � �!��t � . . �'�:�' J" , "�S1' �I�` �... �. �b 5��}' ��«�� k � �+� b�1�4 I�n� ni�11 .� � ��v� 4� ��jitir �f�yy,�t�r'.s ��:.(. i� II�:� ��:, ��• �1�� 4 �� .��'�ryi � �� s /t i��1�� rF :;..a� ��i ��' s't- •1 i°'S/'i .;i f� p:�.{ �� '�Iei fi„ , . �`�`ib ti'�'�;`" ;� I; ``I`f i%i:,, •�(t d1+ �`�; ;�;�;;�, ; �`��`�� {;;;' ' �b��`��r . ,��, ,,+ , D�� `��`j,�� . , . : ��ij��ly�; .fi�� " � �� , ��,�� ji►il��.h! �� : '�� - .. . . . - . . . -- - �u�� a.�;w. �..� i ,� c::� ,�a ,,, ""�„--�, ��i � ' + ��,��i: � a �� 1V �i1t��Y��iyi � � �NIIII� �Aa§�r_ ,,'. _ ��°�,i��:i'`l "e� p' - '�', { ��tit,�� ti��7,, `, �✓*%.�., �I � �,:. � -�� ` � . i � �a, y � � �g _ , tt��yy�u,�i. '��'4i✓d. ;. '1 . . . ' Ar ,ti��a �� . r t'� . . ��'4 . . �.�., � =x �:,� p� i' � � � y1i � � . �r.- ,� . F „�i�, i� � � ij q : /! S f ' • . � � ' �• � � ' , SITE PHOTOGRAPHS T�FIe(7 pynd 1 4 }tr • S r, ' �. '..�. .,.�: s... _ .4,:.�:�� .. .... . .. ' 9�:, �� ,.- . . ' . - � T M�� . r �� ' * � - � ' + . f #_ u. T^! ��^ ' Y r � ' ^J'� - �• . � � . 4 � +� � . F '� . . . ' ... � f � ' ' '*^ n.,, 9 .y�. T vi � w ��'i.'�4 x i 3'f� s +. +�" �`.f s} !'.y� ' �> . , . i _ oa'g��Jkw '`t, .s< , . '�{�'l 1P Y�.Y Aa ,�t� a . t�8� � � K� � � � �;}��` �.�'�Y�� f 4` SY.a: +s L : '� . �i , _ ?��.. �ri�;,�j,Y �. „ :5,�. r .. � . , Photo 5 Restored grade west of inetering chamber (post-construction)! ' t � ' a •;�k'.- � , �'....° c'*�.��'� .; .,�i�� Yt v ., +✓:" ��l,.. �� '�'r'v +e x �r s� . �c= `""�;; ��;� ' ' , ; ;��_�`"��+ ",��»:-�v+ �..� �.� _ � .� =�_� � , i �� : .. - _ _ x.. i ��;:.....�� :, a , � ` q. �,. � � _ �,�r . � � �� . i. _ v . �� 'm:a. `._ , '�'", 1 . J''N' o �... ..,, � .. .�� .— — „' .. _ .__ .__ �x'='� `�a7 Photo 6 Restored grade east of inetering chamber (post-construction) ' 3 ' . . •i - : . r,Ay'. ( °�i'�'7 v� T,ti:.,�f� w(` L �c;�Frc. �;�{ .��\ �T ' — . 'i�r � j '>C4 ^S�Sl� p ,� �lt � t 7�. . b '" '� '�Fr� �� '<.��r , SEt a 1,. �„<s. �. � , � �;zr , �tqjr +,;,s. �,. Ak a...� 'w� p� I ,�, ,� .,�.r;c� � N"� >? .�/ . �e�' � � �`c , , 4A`� '� � :i:�4)r �'� �j��.�.',�„n��37� �yrr� �t ��} I � � +i'� t��+°' +'" �'.~ i 7��, 1.� �''n ' � ' X a , :, 'o�� •�Y�y/� { ��,�i `� � a��i� � ,.. �`� r� ,ty ��vy"�.r jj�' �`w�i �c�'�t � I I �� i � t ')�rar 'vY' � .5} ii'4 �n �i• ..�'�arF�� I q��I� �� -�.'� �r�.�� .e i . . e 3�,�_"4�i� '��. t�`svi' 'g y`Yrq�.yl� i� :.`�u.� p� S� �� : .:! aP ��vS:; ` � �I ,�; ;� �„ .: n � 1��e[ it� 2rav��, v � �� . �A e .,r . i S. , ;. ,l x�� I �, v.l'h,p.. ' +Y-:. t �,,,� � i , t� �� y� �� 4��° " cs '�"a4�'�''�' � t " �; �'Ad��- `' � ;'I �. � . _ -,,,�,_. _ - _� _'a. �: i - �� r . ..^,:� �„� � +�r,,% t 'r-"' ..�..�,".y�' -� . .�--. a.�- ,,, ,,>"� ,��'` _ , ��' _ ��' ..,enm. . �� ._ :�� il�`�Vti'�� . � . - . • '� ' -� . - - • . �' �• � • G:`» y ' ' :;. �t�,��.} `w-]A+ • 'y fY4 Tn �� l� ' Y) �. : •rr.y •. . �� .1� �<` � tEf � � ' f -. � 3'.�,' �?' � '%� �� :�� -. . i� . . '�{ V J .. �,L�yy,�n. ,�„1 y r tie�r'�t- •s - . �syw,, ti - A ! I �.,q u"t�+ �.v.�_�...^e�y � '.. ��id�'��r'{ •- & » . _ ,�d,�rr.� � �'." ;.;r��.,�, .: . � � �+� � �' ��' ` �.� :� . > ,:w �� VI � s i,� , n " �°�� ,p,%��'S`'+-�,4'`� y,�„'1' � .f.�,{ Y � �et �c°. 'f�` N Nt� 1 ty- nk � .. 'N "'�" +Fi'� �� µc��*i �', �y 1 V t�Fi^',' � . � �� y �'.�'. t�. \, . '�'�� '�4 �"�' '�" '� . • ' � �- �� •_ . ,�. � — - - - -- - —— — — - — � ^_ -- _ � l _ I r— i r � - � _I � _ __ _ � I � � _ ! �'] � i I� � ` - � -' � � ��+ � °'--r- �-'� o°' C , � � ��.. �� i _ � � �t ��.� , � �_ ��,��,� � .��, _,�� . � � � � � _/�� /��L � �,� � �`',• � �� f l' •�v /, ��`9� � � 4d .� �` � � „ �?�r (f� � � .� - �7 ' i ., i.. "ail!I __. ' ;�.1 � / � ""_% - �� ----, . i , A� r ` '�', � �— { i� �� i i: ��; �� — _ --- — - - — - --- -- � i � v , TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM — FINAL T�19hE&B011d ' Peabody Metering Station Improvements ' 70: Arthur A. Knight, P.E. and Alan Taubert, Jr., P.E., South Essex Sewerage District � FRom: Todd Brown, P.E. and David Popielarczyk, P.E., Tighe & Bond Dnre: February 8, 2007 � ' 1.0 Purpose This evaluation was performed to address flow monitoring accuracy and sampling concerns � identified by the South Essex Sewerage District (the District) at their Peabody Metering Station. In addition, this evaluation addresses the concern that the flow meter at this facility can not be easily isolated for maintenance and/or repair. During this effort, the following � tasks were performed: 1. The existing metering facility was reviewed ' 2. Deficiencies were identified � 3. Improvement alternatives were developed and compared 4. Preferred altematives were selected for additional evaluation based on preliminary � screening 5. The preferred alternatives were further evaluated by estunating implementation costs, � evaluating the impact on hydraulics through the meter chamber through sewer system modeling, and reviewing soil conditions where excavation will be performed � 6. This technical memorandum was developed that presents the evaluation results and recommendations � 2.0 Background Figure 1 is a site plan that shows the location of the Peabody Metering Station. The Peabody ' Metering Station, which is owned and operated by the District, straddles the Peabody/Salem City line and measures and records wastewater flow that is conveyed to it from the City of Peabody_ sewer system. Samples of Peabody's wastewater flow are also collected at this � facility. These data are used to calculate Peabody's share of the operation and maintenance costs at the South Essex Sewerage District Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) located in Salem MA. � Figure 2 presents section views of the piping arrangement through the Peabody Metering Station, which is located at the decommissioned Peabody Grease and Grit Facility on Harmony � Grove Road, along the Peabody-Salem Interceptor. Flow from the interceptor is normally 1 � TECHNICALMEMOR4NDUM-FINAL Tghe&Bond � directed to the metering station through a 78-inch reinforced concrete pipe at Diversion Structure N. Approxunately 50 feet downstream of Structure N and at the northern end of the � abandoned grease and grit chamber the 78-inch pipe enters an inlet channel that was part of the decommissioned facility. Wastewater flow entering the inlet channel exits through a 36-inch ductile iron pipe constructed in the mid-1990s that conveys Peabody's wastewater flow � southeasterly through the old grit chamber approximately 100 feet, at which point the pipe bends down and northeasterly, connecting into a 36-inch cast iron pipe that conveys the wastewater flow into the metering chamber. A 36-inch magnetic flow meter is located � approximately 20 feet from the metering chamber entrance and is followed immediately by a 36-inch by 24-inch concentric reducer located at the downstream end of the metering chamber. � Downstream of the metering chamber there are two buried, tapered pipe sections that convey the wastewater flow into Structure M, transitioning from 24-inch diameter upstream to 36-inch diameter downsueam. The wastewater flow that enters Structure M is discharged into the 78- 1 inch Peabody-Salem interceptor, where it is subsequently conveyed through Salem to the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station at the DistricYs WWTF. � Wasiewater flow may be diverted through a 78-inch bypass pipe from Structure N to Structure M in order to perform maintenance on the flow meter. The diversion requires the installation of stop logs and sand bags at Structure N and the instaliation of a steel plate and sand bags at iStructure M. Subsequently, the main line pipe, including the section where the flow meter is located, can be dewatered by placing a submersible pump into the metering chamber through an access port above it. � The District has identified the following metering station concerns: � • Flow Meter Accuracy - Grease accumulation has been observed within the flow meter and adjoining piping and it is suspected that the resulting flow restriction could be � affecting meter accuracy. The grease accumulation was identified and observed by District maintenance staff when the metering station was taken off line in August 2005 for cleaning and inspection. At that time, a video inspection of the pipe was performed. District maintenance staff observed that the grease accumulation was several inches thick and extended approxunately 20 feet through and upstream of the flow meter from the reducer. It is likely that the grease accumulates near the crown of �' the pipe and flow meter. The concentric reducer located immediately downstream of the meter may be causing entrained air bubbles to form upstream of it. The entrained � air may be enhancing the natural buoyancy of the grease particles, causing them to rise and congeal along the crown of the pipe. , The video inspection identified that the inside diameter of the reducer is slightly larger than the inside diameter of the upstream flow meter. The meter manufacturer has indicated that the difference in inside diameters would have a negligible impact on � meter accuracy. In addition to the grease accumulation, the piping arrangement may be creating � hydraulic conditions that are not optimal for magnetic-type flow metering. The � -2- � TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL YT19F1E8(B011d iconcentric reducer located directly downstream of the flow meter may create turbulence that could adversely impact flow meter accuracy. � • Flow Meter Maintenance - The current metering station bypass arrangement does not aliow for efficient isolation of the meter for general cleaning, maintenance or � emergency repairs. As described above, the flow meter is currently isolated using stop logs, a steel plate and sand bags at Structures M and N. Because this arrangement does not provide a tight seal, dewatering of the flow meter and connecting piping is typically � a very slow process, often requiring continuous pumping over several weeks until a sufficient quantity of debris collects in both structures against the stop logs, plate and sand bags to reduce the leakage to a point where physical entry is possible. � • Wastewater Sampling - The grease accumulation described above may also be � impacting the sampling of Peabody's wastewater flow. The sample pipe inlet tap is located approximately 10 feet upstream of the flow meter and at approxunately the two o'clock position (facing downstream). The sampling port is within the pipe section � where grease accumulation was observed. Because the sampling port is located near the top of the pipe, some accumulated grease may be drawn into it, resulting in clogging of the sample pump and/or sampler and samples that may not be il � representative of the wastewater flow characteristics at the time of sampling. Because of lunited space within the metering chamber, there does not appear to be sufficient space to driil and tap lower on the pipe in order to relocate the sampling port away � from the grease accumulation. 3.0 Facility Review , , In addition to the concerns noted above that were identified by the District, the metering faciliry was reviewed to identify other deficiencies that could impact the collection of reliable � flow and sampling data, facility operation, or facility maintenance. The existing flow meter and its installation were reviewed to detemune whether changes are � appropriate to improve meter accuracy. The existing 36-inch magnetic flow meter is an Altoflux IFS 4000 Electromagnetic Flow Sensor with a model IFC O10 transmitter, as manufactured by Krohne. The flow meter was installed in 1995 while the current transmitter 1 was installed more recently, in 2004. The flow meter is constructed of stainless steel with a polyurethane liner. The meter manufacturer has indicated that the flow meter in a wastewater � application has a service life that is typically greater than 10 years. The actual service life varies depending on the constituents in the wastewater flow and the installed application. The meter manufacturer has indicated that the liner can degrade over time but that there are ,� methods available to evaluate the integrity of the ]iner, such as resistance testing. Resistance testing was performed on the Peabody Metering Facility flow meter in June 2005 and no deficiencies were identified. ,� Krohne recommends the following for this magnetic flow meter for optimal flow monitoring: 1 • Inlet - Provide a length of straight piping equivalent to five pipe diameters upstream of the meter. This arrangement will reduce the potential for meter inaccuracies due to 1 -3- I �� TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL `T19FIEHCBOOC� ', � turbulence caused by changes in pipe size or d'uection (from bends, reducers, etc.). The current piping arrangement provides a length of straight piping upstream of the ' � flow meter equivalent to approxunately 6.5 pipe diameters. • Outlet - Provide a length of straight piping equivalent to two pipe diameters � downstream of the meter. Similar to the inlet recommendation, this arrangement will reduce the potential for meter inaccuracies due to turbulence caused by changes in pipe size oi direction (from bends, reducers, etc.). The current piping arrangement provides � no straight piping downstream of the flow meter since a concentric reducer connects directly to the downstream side of the meter. The meter manufacturer has indicated that the ]oss of accuracy resulting from the reducer is difficult to quantify without � performing modeling specific to the Peabody Metering Station layout. • Flow Range -The wastewater flow at the Peabody Metering Station ranges from an � estimated minimum flow of approximately 3.5 mgd to an estimated peak flow of approximately 32 mgd. The Khrone representative has indicated that the meter � accuracy for a meter meeting their layout recommendations is plus or minus 0.8 to 0.9% of actual flow rate in the flow range between approximately 3 mgd and 87.5 mgd. This confirms that a 36-inch magnetic flow meter is appropriate for this �, � application. Based on the information provided by the Krohne flow meter representative and the testing �' � performed in 2005, we conclude that the existing flow meter is suitable for continued use at the Peabody Metering Station. � Space within the metering chamber is _ ��.�. �, �W = .� ��.� ,- limited. There is a 36-inch pipe within a 6 ° j� �, , ` �'�'��i ,�-'�� foot wide chamber. In addition, there are � .' �� ,a�" � L.i� `'� other small diameter piping and conduit , � i � within the chamber for sampling and flow � u� _ �""�� - ` �-' monitoring that limit access and require � �-: , � n �� T periodic maintenance. Maintenance and ' ; �" �' 7x �� repairs can be difficult in this area because , �.�� ,��, � ."� there is limited space to access system '� j .� -: �� components and operate tools. Access into t '" �`�'fi '�� . F„. �� the charuber is through a 5 foot by 5 foot � `' � z . � � � hatch on the structure roof slab located at grade level. � 4.0 Description of Improvement Alternatives Five unprovement alternatives were developed and reviewed during this evaluation: � Alternative 1 - Take no action � Alternative 2 - Eliminate Reducer in Metering Chamber � -4- �� TECHNICAI MEMORANDUM-FINAL Tghe&Bond I, � Alternative 3 - Relocate Reducer to Upstream End of Metering Chamber � Alternative 4 - Relocate Flow Meter Upstream of Current Metering Chamber Alternative 5 - Construct New Piping and Metering Chamber from Structures N to M �, Each of these alternatives is described in the paragraphs that follow. � Alternative 1 - Take No Action Under Alternative 1, no unprovements would be provided and the meter measurement � accuracy concern would not be addressed. Maintenance would continue to be difficult within the chamber because of limited space and there would still be no positive, reliable means of flow isolation. In addition, sampling accuracy would continue to be a concern because there is � not sufficient space to install the sample tap lower to move it away from the upper area of the pipe where grease builds up. I � This is the lowest cost alternative considered. Alternative 2 - Eliminate Reducer in Metering Chamber � � Under Alternative 2, shown in Figure 3, the reducer and the two tapered pipe sections downstream of the flow meter and upstream of Structure M would be replaced with new 36- � inch pipe. In addition, the existing magnetic flow meter would be relocated approximately 2 feet upstream of its current location and new isolation valves would be installed upstream and downstream of the meter to facilitate maintenance ,and replacement. The proposed layout � would satisfy the flow meter manufacturer's recommendations for lengths of straight piping upstream and downstream of the flow meter. Note that new buried piping would need to be installed downstream of the metering chamber and modifications to the existing concrete i � penetrations through the basement azea and Structure M would be necessary. This alternative is expected to improve flow metering accuracy and sampling by eluninating � downstream piping restrictions and the "trap" created by the concentric reducer that may be causing the observed grease build-up. In addition, the elnnination of the 24-inch piping and I � old tapered CI piping downstream of the flow meter may improve the hydraulics (this is discussed in greater detail in Section 6). I � A disadvantage of this alternative is that piping modifications are required to the buried piping between the flow meter and Structure M. Given the history of filling the former grit chambers with incinerator ash, there is some concern that ash may have been used for fill in this area or II � ash may have contaminated soil material used during backfilling. Removal/handling of contaminated soils and groundwater would increase project costs. In addition, construction is expected to be difficult in the Metering Chamber because there is little space between the pipe � and the chamber walls. � � 5 �I�� TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL T19F1eHCBOIId ' Alternative 3 - Relocate Reducer to Upstream End of Metering Chamber � Under Aiternative 3, shown in Figure 4, the existing 36-inch by 24-inch concentric reducer would be relocated to the upstream end of the metering chamber and the 36-inch piping and magnetic flow meter within the chamber would be replaced with 24-inch piping and a 24-inch I flow meter. The new 24-inch piping would be connected to the existing tapered pipe at the downstream end of the metering chamber. Similar to Alternative 2, this alternative is expected to reduce the quantity of grease build-up in t]le metering chamber, unproving meter accuracy � and resulting in the collection of more representative samples. New isolation valves would be installed in the 24-inch piping, upstream and downstream of the flow meter, with a sufficient amount of straight pipe length to comply with the meter manufacturer's layout � recommendations. An advantage of this alternative is that it does not require replacement of buried piping, � decreasing the risk of encountering unexpected construction conditions that increase project costs. In addition, the smaller pipe diameter proposed within the metering chamber would � result in higher flow velocities, further reducing the potential for grease and solids build-up in the piping system. However, this alternative would increase the hydraulic grade from the existing layout under some flow conditions, as shown in Table 1. The flow data used for this I � evaluation is described in greater detail in Section 6. TABLE 1 Hydraulic Grade Changes �• Flow Condition Flow Rate(mgd) APProximate Increase in Hydreulic Grade(ft.) � Estimated Minimum Flow�'� 3.5 0 Average Daily Flow�Z� 10.6 0.3 Measured Peak Flow�3� 25.0 2.1 � Estimated Peak Flow�4� 31.8 3.4 (1) Estimated as 1/3 of the average daily flow value provided by the District. (2) Based on information provided by the District. � (3) Based on Flow data recorded on circular charls provided by the District for October 2005 and May,June and July 2006. (4) Estimated as the 3 times the average daily flow value provided by the District. � This alternative is not recommended because it would increase the hydraulic grade that now exists. � Alternative 4 - Relocate Flow Meter Upstream of Current Metering Chamber Under Alternative 4, shown in Figure 5, the existing flow meter would be relocated upstream 1 of the metering chamber and within the straight section of 36-inch ductile iron pipe located in the abandoned grease and grit chamber. Similar to Alternatives 2 and 3, the flow meter would � be located with sufficient lengths of straight pipe upstream and downstream of it to comply with the meter manufacturer's layout recommendations. � A review of the hydraulics within this pipe section indicates that this pipe, which has an invert elevation ranging from 2.33 to 4.30 feet, is partially full under some flow conditions. Because ' -6- � TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL T19FIEHCBOIICI � the magnetic flow meter does not accurately measure liquid within pipes flowing partially full, the relocated flow meter and a section of new pipe would be installed at an invert elevation of � 0.00 feet (the current invert elevation of the flow meter). By installing the proposed pipe at a lower elevation, the pipe would flow full under the anticipated range of flow conditions. � The relocated flow meter would be installed within a new concrete chamber to provide access for maintenance and repairs. In addition, a new structure would be installed upstream of the meter to (1) isolate the meter through operation of a slide gate and (2) provide a location where � grease can collect and be easily removed by District personnel. A tee and isolation valve would be installed downstream of the proposed metering chamber, at the current flow meter location. The tee would be located below the existing access hatch and oriented with the � branch line in vertical. A blind flange would be provided on the tee branch and could be removed periodically by District staff to (1) review the interior of the pipe to evaluate whether I � grease is building up at the nearby sampling port and (2) to remove grease from this location, if necessary. �I � This alternative offers the advantage of avoiding replacement of buried piping, where unknown conditions exist (as proposed under Alternative 2) and does not require the replacement of 36- inch piping with 24-inch piping, which would increase the hydraulic grade line upstream of the � metering faciliry (proposed under Alternative 3). In addition, this alternative is expected to be easier to construct than Alternatives 2 and 3 because excavation would be within an open, unpaved azea. This alternative would provide the District with the flexibility to have a larger � chamber constructed around the flow meter to facilitate maintenance (there is little room in the current metering chamber for maintenance). This alternative also provides an accessible location for the collection and subsequent removal of grease from the sewer system upstream I "� of the flow meter, reducing the likelihood that grease would collect at the flow meter. However, because this alternative requires the construction of a new metering chamber and 1 grease trap, it is expected to be more expensive than Alternatives l, 2 and 3. Alternative 5 - Construct New Piping and Metering Chamber from Structures N to M � Under Alternative 5, shown in Figure 6, new 36-inch diameter piping would be constructed from Structures N to M outside of the footprint of the decommissioned Grease and Grit � Facility. A new magnetic flow meter would be installed within this new pipe section that , would be accessed through a new concrete vault. Structure N would be extended southerly approximately 10 feet in order to provide space for a connection to the upstream end of the I � proposed 36-inch sewer. A hole would be cored through the wall of Structure M to accommodate the downstream end of the proposed 36-inch sewer. The existing piping through 1 the flow meter from Structures N to M would be abandoned in place under this alternative. The magnetic flow meter would be set at an invert elevation that would ensure full pipe flow � through the meter during typical low flow conditions and the pipe from Structure N to Structure M would be sloped to allow the 36-inch pipe to drain to Strucmre M during maintenance activities, facilitating dewatering. In addition, the meter would be installed with ' sufficient lengths of straight pipe upstream and downstream of it to comply with the meter manufacturer's layout recommendations. 1 -7- 1 TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL `T19IlESCBOfld I � In order to allow flow to be bypassed around the meter for maintenance, a slide gate would be I installed at the inlet to the proposed 36-inch sewer in Structure N and at the outlet of the , 1 proposed 36-inch sewer in Structure M. When the gates are closed, the flow would be directed into the existing 78-inch bypass pipe. � Under this alternative, the sampling port would be relocated to the new metering chamber. A new sampling line would need to be constructed from the sampler to the new chamber. 1 This alternative is not expected to be difficult to construct, with the possible exception of at ' Structures M and N, but would require excavation in an area where soil contamination may exist. The former grit chambers were used in the past for incinerator ash disposal in which � hexavalent chromium was identified. It is not known if the ash disposal practices contaminated any of the soils surrounding the site. I Similar to Alternative 4, this alternative would provide the District with the flexibility to have a larger chamber constructed around the flow meter to facilitate maintenance. However, because this alternative requires the construction of a new metering chamber, a significant � amount of new, large diameter piping, and potentially the excavation of contaminated soil, it is likely to be the most expensive of the alternatives considered. � 5.0 Screening of Improvement Alternatives � A summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the five alternatives considered is presented below in Table 2. Each of the alternatives would address the meter accuracy and isolation concerns and the sampling concem described at the beginning of this technical memorandum. � TABLE 2 Comparison of Alternatives � Alternative Advantages Disadvantages 1-Take No Action -Lowest cost alternative -Does not address flow monitoring [Not Recommended] accuracy or sampling concerns � -Access for maintenance would continue to be di�cult 2—Eliminate Existing Reducer in -Eliminates smaller diameter -Requires replacement of buried Metering Chamber piping downstream of ineter piping where conditions are , which may decrease hydraulic unknown grade line upstream -Small work area makes construction -Expected to reduce potential for difficult � grease accumulation -Access for maintenance would continue to be diffcult 3- Relocate Reducer to Upstream End -Relocation of reducer expected -Increases hydraulic grade line � of Metering Chamber to reduce potential for grease upstream [Not Recommended] accumulation -Small work area makes construction -Smaller piping and meter would di�cult increase flow velocity,fuRher _qccess for maintenance would ' , reducing potential for grease continue to be difficult and solids build-up -Expected to be less expensive � than all altematives except Alternative 1 � -$- � TECHNICALMEMOR4NDUM-FINAL T19I12SCBOfld � TABLE 2 Comparison of Alternatives � Alternative Advantages Disadvantages 4- Relocate Flow Meter Upstream of -Easier to construct than -Expected to be more expensive � Current Metering Chamber Alternatives 2 and 3 than Alternatives 1,2 and 3 � � -Allows construction of a larger �,I metering chamber to facilitate � � maintenance � , -Provides most positive method I of reducing potential for grease build-up I � 5-Construct New Piping and Metering -Greatest design flexibility to -Expected to be significantly more Chamber from Structures N to M optimize hydraulics through expensive than the other [Not recommended] meter alternatives -Relatively easy construction, -Requires excavation in an area ' 1 except at Structures N and M where contaminated soil may exist i -New pipe route and elimination of smaller diameter piping may ' � decrease hydraulic grade line upstream -Allows construction of a larger metering chamber to facilitate � maintenance I � We recommend that Alternative 2 — Eliminate Reducer in Metering Chamber and Alternative 4 - Relocate Flow Meter Upstream of Current Metering Chamber be evaluated in greater detail during the second phase of this study, described in the sections that follow. Under both of � � these alternatives, the existing flow meter would be removed, cleaned, temporarily stored, and then reinstalled at its new location. �I � Alternative 1 — Take No Action is not recommended because it does not address the flow monitoring accuracy and sampling concerns identified by the District. �I � Alternative 3 - Relocate Reducer to Upstream End of Metering Chamber is not recommended because the installation of the smaller piping proposed would increase the existing hydraulic profile. , Alternative 5 - Construct New Piping and Metering Chamber from Structures N to M is not recommended because it is expected to be significantly more expensive to construct than the ' other improvement altematives developed. In addition, Alternative 4 provides similar benefits to this alternative at a lower cost. � 6.0 Evaluation of Preferred Alternatives Based on the results of the screening evaluation described above and discussion of these results , with District staff, Altematives 2 and 4 were selected as the preferred alternatives. These two alternatives were evaluated in greater detail by: � 1. Evaluating their impact on hydraulics through and upstream of the metering chamber. 1 9 1 � � TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL Tghe&Bond � 2. Evaluating soil/groundwater where replacement of buried piping is required under Alternative 2. ' 3. Developing estimated capital costs for their implementation. IAlternatives 1, 3 and 5 were not reviewed further. 6.1 Modeling � Purpose � A hydraulic model of the Peabody Metering Station and the downstream Peabody-Salem Interceptor was created to: 1 1. Determine the unpact, if any, of the operation of the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station on the Peabody Metering Chamber, based on the operating scenarios described in this section. r2. Confirm that the pipe section at the meter is flowing full under a range of anticipated flow and hydraulic boundary conditions, for the existing metering station Ilayout and the two proposed improvement alternatives. , 3. Evaluate the unpact of the proposed metering station improvements on the hydraulic � grade line in and upstream of the metering station along the Peabody-Salem Interceptor to Howley Street. ' Evaluation Method General - The Peabody Metering Station and Peabody-Salem Interceptor were evaluated using I the EXTRAN block of the EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). This computer model uses sewer system information including pipe invert elevations, ground elevations, pipe length and pipe diaineter to construct profiles of the sewers of interest. Once the pipe network � data has been entered into the model, hydraulic grade lines can be computed for vazious flow _ and boundary conditions and presented in tabular form or graphically on a pipe profile schematic. Pipe friction losses are computed in determining the hydraulic grade line as well as � minor head losses, based on data entered on pipe bends, valves, reducers, etc. The SWMM model was used to evaluate the Peabody Metering Station under existing � conditions and for the two preferred improvement alternatives selected through the initial screening phase of this project (Alternatives 2 and 4). The Peabody-Salem Interceptor from � the manhole at Howley Street, which is approximately 200 feet upstream of the metering chamber, to the DistricYs Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station at the WWTF was modeled in this evaluation. , Flow Development - The three layouts noted above were evaluated for four flow conditions: estimated minunum, average, measured peak, and estimated peak. A summary of these flows � is presented in Table 3. Note that both the wastewater from Peabody, which flows tluough the ' -10- ' ` TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM-FINAL Tghe&Bond � metering chamber, and the wastewater from Salem, which flows into the interceptor at several locations downstream of the metering chamber, were included in the model. � TABLE 3 Peabody, Salem, and Total Flows to the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station I Flow Rate (mgd) Flow Condition Peabody Salem Total Estimated Minimum 3.5 2.2 5.7 � Average 10.6 6.6 17.2 � Measured Peak 25.0 23.0 48.0 � Estimated Peak 31.8 19.7 51.5 The average wastewater flows from Peabody and Salem were provided by the District. All of , Peabody's wastewater flows are measured at the Peabody Metering Chamber while all of the wastewater flows from Peabody and Salem are measured at the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump I � Station. As such, the Salem flows are calculated as the difference between the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station flow and the metering chamber flow. I � Measured peak flows were determined by reviewing flow data recorded on circular charts from the metering chamber and influent pump station during several days when significant storms were observed in October 2005 and May, June and July 2006. However, because only a � lunited amount of data were reviewed to determine the measured peak flow, peak flow was also estimated by applying a peaking factor of 3 to the average daily flows. In comparison, the ratio of peak flow to average flow is estimated as approximately 2.5 at the Peabody Metering � Station and 2.3 at the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station using the graphical method presented in the document entitled Technical Report No. 16, Guides for the Design of Wastewater Treatment Works, 1998 edition, which is commonly referred to as TR-16. This � � document is often used as a guide for sewer design and construction in Massachusetts. As such, the estimated peak flow values presented in Table 3 are believed to be reasonably conservative estimates. � Because limited measured flow data was reviewed, a sunilar approach was used to estunate minunum flows, The minimum flows were estimated as 1/3 of the average daily flows from '� Peabody and Salem (minimum to average flow ratio of 0.33). In comparison, the ratio of minimum flow to average flow is estimated as approximately 0.34 at the Peabody Metering I � Station and 0.38 at the Influent Pump Station using the graphical method presented in TR-16. As such, the estimated minimum flow values presented in Table 3 are believed to be reasonably conservative estunates. I ' As noted above, wastewater flow from Salem enters the Peabody-Salem Interceptor at several locations downstream of the Peabody Metering Station. The locations at which the flow enters � the interceptor were determined using an overall map of the sewer system served by the District entitled Existing Collection System Plan, Figure 2.1, prepared by the LEA Group, Inc., dated June, 20, 1992 and the construction record plans of the Peabody-Salem Interceptor. � The mapping information was also used to determine the sewer drainage areas to each interceptor connection point from Salem. The sewer drainage areas were then associated with ' -11- , TECHNICALMEMOR4NDUM-FINAL �T19FIEIIlB0�1C� ' census tracts established for Salem, which allowed us to approxunate population within each sewer drainage area (based on Year 2000 census data). The wastewater flow to each � connection point was then estunated based on the ratio of population in the upstream drainage area to the total population within the sewer drainage areas to the interceptor connection points. � Model Boundary Conditions - The SWMM model was evaluated for three downstream boundary conditions: � • Critical flow at the entrance to the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station — this condition sunulates free flow discharge at the end of the interceptor into the pump � station wetwell (no backwater effects) • Normal flow at the entrance to the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station — this � condition simulates steady state, uniform open channel flow within the interceptor with no backwater effects , • A tailwater elevation of -3.5 at the entrance to the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station — this condition simulates the normal high water level in the wetwell (at this ' wetwell water level the pumps are operating at 100% speed) The evaluation of the various layouts, flows, and boundary conditions, resulted in 36 unique � model runs. The model runs are summarized by schematic profiles of the Peabody-Salem Interceptor, from the Howiey Street manhole to the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station, with the hydraulic grade line shown and labeled. In addition, for the minimum flow condition � an enlarged view of the profile of the Peabody-Salem Interceptor at the Peabody Metering ' Station has been developed, with the hydraulic grade line shown and labeled. The key profiles are presented in Appendix A. , Because the model can not accommodate negative elevations, which are encountered at the metering chamber and the Influent Pump Station, the actual elevations were adjusted by adding ' 100 to all elevations for modeling purposes. The SWMM model results were checked using hydraulic calculations developed in an Excel 1 spreadsheet to compute total headloss and hydraulic grade. xesuits , Although some instability was observed for some model runs, likely due to the short pipe ]engths required to develop the model at the metering chamber, in most cases the hydraulic , grades calculated by the SWMM model compared well to the hydraulic grades calculated by the Excel spreadsheet (less than 5% difference). A comparison of the hydraulic grade data at the manhole on the Peabody-Salem Interceptor at Howley Street is presented in Appendix B. 1 The model results show that the three downstream boundary conditions do not impact the hydraulic grade at the Peabody Metering Station under any of the flow conditions reviewed. I For each boundary condition, the model indicates that normal open channel flow conditions would exist just downstream of the metering station. We conclude that the tailwater elevation , -12- , TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL `TKJIIEHCBO�If� � at the influent pump station would need to be significantly greater than Elevation -3.5 in order to back up flow to the metering station. , The hydraulic grade line at the metering station flow meter was simulated for the existing layout and the two preferred improvement alternatives in order to confirm that the pipe would � flow fuil at the meter under each flow condition. If the pipe does not flow full at the meter, then meter accuracy is reduced. These model results were generally confirmed using calculations developed in an Excel spreadsheet. � The model simulation results indicate that for the existing layout and Alternative 4 the pipe would flow full under each of the flow conditions reviewed. However, the model simulation ' results indicate that for Alternative 2 the pipe at the flow meter would not flow full under the estimated minimum flow of 3.5 mgd. As such, the Aiternative 2 layout was revised to lower the pipe at the flow meter, allowing full pipe flow under each of the flow conditions reviewed. IThe revised Alternative 2 layout (Alternative 2A) is presented in Figure 7. The minimum flow model runs ue presented in Figures A1, A2, and A3 in Appendix A for the existing layout, I�� Alternative 2A and Alternative 4, respectively. The impact of the proposed unprovements on the hydraulic grade line through the interceptor , was evaluated by reviewing the simulated hydraulic grade in the Peabody-Salem Interceptor at the Howley Street manhole, located approximately 200 feet upstream of the metering station. A summary of the hydraulic grades for each flow condition and improvement altemative and I , the change in hydraulic grade from the existing layout is summarized in Table 4. The estimated peak flow model runs with a downstream tailwater depth of -3.5 are presented in Figures A4, A5, and A6 in Appendix A for the existing layout, Alternative 2A and Alternative , 4, respectively. TABLE 4 ' � Hydraulic Grade Changes at the Upstream Howley Street Manhole�'� Existing Alt.2A Change in Alt.4 Change in Flow Condition Hydreulic Hydraulic Hydraulic Hydreulic Hydraulic � Grade (ft.) Grede(ft.) Grade (ft.) Grede (ft.) Grede (ft.) Estimated Minimum 5.5 5.5 0 5.5 0 (3.5 mgd) ' Average(10.6 mgd) 6.3 6.3 0 6.3 0 Measured Peak 8.0 7.3 -0.7 9.8 +1.8 (25.0 mgd) � Estimated Peak 10.0 8.8 -1.2 13.0 +3.0 (31.8 mgd) (1) Hydraulic grades are based on Excel spreadsheet calculations,which were,in most cases,within 5°/of the SW MM model � resulLs. The model simulations indicate that hydraulic grade is reduced under the Alternative 2A layout � but is incieased under the Alternative 4 layout. Under peak flow conditions, Altemative 4 results in an increase in the hydraulic grade as high as 3.0 feet. � � -13- I , TECHNICALMEMOR4NDUM-FINAL `T19F12SCB017d ' 6.2 Soil/Groundwater Evaluation ' On December 27, 2006, New Hampshire Boring of Derry, New Hampshire, under the observation of Tighe & Bond, advanced soil boring B-1 to a depth of 18 feet below surface grade via Drive and Wash drilling techniques to evaluate subsurface conditions. ' The soil boring was advanced at the location of the buried piping that would be replaced under Alternative 2A, between the flow meter and Structure M, in order to collect data on soil rypes � at this location. Because of the concern that contaminated soil may have been used for fill on the site, soil samples were collected for laboratory analyses. ' During soil boring advancement, soil samples were collected continuously at two foot intervals using a steel split spoon and groundwater was encountered at an approxunate depth of four feet below surface grade. Soil boring B-1 was completed as monitoring well MW-1 at a depth of ' 13 feet below surface grade. The subsurface consisted mainly of fine sands and sil[ with varying percentages of small gravel. Evidence of urban debris was observed at several sampling intervals. A boring log documenting the soils encountered is presented in Appendix , C The blow counts were relatively low, which is an indication that the soils encountered may be ' � difficult to compact. As such, it would be prudent to assume that the soils to be excavated will need to be removed and replaced with fill material that can be more easily compacted. � Soil samples B-i (8-10 feet), B-1 (10-12 feet) and B-1 (16-18 feet) were submitted to Alpha Woods Hole Labs of Westborough, Massachusetts for analysis of the following parameters: ' • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) • RCRA 8 Metals (Arsenic, Barium Cadmium, Trivalent Chromium, Lead, Mercury, � Selenium, and Silver) � • Hexavalent Chromium Soil boring laboratory analytical results indicate that the total arsenic concentration of 23 1 mg/kg exceeded the applicable RCS 1 Reportable Concentration of 20 mg/kg in sample B-1 (16-18 feet). No other target analytes were detected at concentrations that exceeded the applicable reportable concentrations. , Due to the presence of urban debris noted in the subsurface, soil sampie B-1 (16-18) was submitted to MicroVision Laboratories in Chelmsford, Massachusetts for a Coal Ash ' Determination. The laboratory results indicate the presence of coal and coal ash in sample B-1 (16-18 feet). According to the provisions of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) (ref. 310 CMR 40.0317(9)), releases and threats of release that are related to coal and coal ash are � non reportable. It is Tighe & Bond's opinion that the arsenic exceedence of the RCS 1 Standard in soil sample B-1 (16-18 feet) resulted from the presence of coal and coal ash detected in the sample and is therefore non-reportable under the MCP. Copies of the soil ' analytical reports are included in Appendix D. The results of the soil analyses are presented in Table 5. ' -14- ' TECHNICALMEMORANDUM-FINAL �Tghe&Bond , On January 4, 2007, Tighe & Bond returned to site to collect a groundwater sample from MW- 1. Groundwater samples were collected pursuant to the United States Environmental ' Protection Agency (EPA) Region 1 Low Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the Collection of Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells, July 30, 1996 publication. A Geotech peristaltic pump, commected to one-quarter-inch inside diameter Teflon tubing, which � was placed at the mid-point of the well screen, was used to purge the well. Teflon-lined polyethylene tubing was attached to the pump as the discharge line. Optimum care was taken to minimize the length of tubing, insuring steady flow rates and eluninating disturbance to the � water column within the well. A flow rate of approximately 250 ml/minute was used to purge the well and collect low-flow samples. Measurements for pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, � specific conductance and temperature were obtained from the purge water. The well was purged until the stabilization criteria, as outlined by EPA, were achieved. I ' Following stabilization, groundwater samples were transferred directly into sample containers appropriately prepared for the specific analyses to be performed. The groundwater sample collected for metals was also field-filtered using a 0.45 micron field filter. Proper chains of �i � custody procedures were followed when samples were transferred to Alpha. The groundwater sample was submitted to Alpha for dissolved metal, hexavalent chromium and PAH analysis. No target analytes where detected in groundwater at concentrations that exceeded the applicable , reportable concentratios. Copies of the groundwater analytical reports are included in Appendix D. The results of the groundwater analyses are presented in Table 6. ' ' Although the presence of the soil fill and related contaminants are not considered reportable to the DEP, certain soil management practices are recommended during construction. Excess soil that can not be reused on-site within the point of origin should be managed at a permitted off- ' � site facility. Based on the contaminant concentrations detected, the most probable available off-site management locations are reuse as daily soil cover in a municipal solid waste landfill � (lined or unlined). Soil transported off-site should be accompanied by a bill-of-lading (BOL) or material shipping record (MSR) to document the disposal/reuse location of the soil. 6.3 Costs ' The Engineer's opinion of probable construction costs for Alternatives 2A and 4 were developed in this evaluation and are summarized in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. The 1 construction costs include the cost of new piping, structures, equipment, conduit and wiring, including labor and materials to complete the work and return the disturbed azeas to their pre- construction condition. In addition, the construction costs inciude the cost to remove, clean, � temporarily store, and reinstail the existing flow meter and associated controls at their new location. The construction costs are based on an October 2006 Engineering News Record I � Construction Cost Index (ENR CCI) of 7883. Both alternatives include a cost for the contractor to temporarily isolate the piping through the 1 metering facility from Structures N to M in order to remove sections of old piping, install new piping and valves, and relocate the flow meter. Because the isolation plate used at Structure M to bypass flows around the metering faciliry does not provide a tight seal, a temporary dam ' � will likely be necessary in Structure M. II , -15- i , � TECHNICALMEMORANDUM—FINAL T IIEIICBO�iC� i g � The estimated capital cost for Alternative 2A is significantly lower than the estunated capital cost for Alternative 4. , 7.0 Conclusions ' The modeling results indicate that the three downstream bounduy conditions at the Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station do not impact the hydraulic grade at the Peabody Metering Station under any of the flow conditions reviewed. We conclude that the tailwater ' elevation at the pump station would need to be significantly higher than elevation -3.5 in order to back up the flow at the Peabody Metering Station. � Based on the currently known information at the Peabody Metering Station, Alternative 2A — Eliminate Reducer in Metering Chamber can be constructed at a significantly lower cost than Altemative 4 — Relocate Flow Meter Upstream of Current Metering Chamber. In addition, ' Alternative 2A would reduce the hydraulic grade line upstream of the Metering Chamber under some flow conditions while Alternative 4 would increase the hydraulic grade line upstream of ' the Metering Chamber by as much as 3 feet under the estunated peak flow condition. Alternative 4 provides the District with two significant advantages over Alternative 2A: II, ' 1. A new metering chamber would be constructed, sized to unprove the DistricYs ability to maintain the flow meter. ' 2. A grease trap would be constructed, which would improve the DistricYs abiliry to remove grease upstream of the flow meter and sampiing port. ' 8.0 Recommendations , It is our understanding, based on input from the District, that the sewer system upstream of the Peabody Metering Chamber can not accommodate the increase in hydraulic grade that would result from Alternative 4. As such, Alternative 4 is not recommended. ' Altemative 2A, which reduces the hydraulic grade line upstream of the Metering Chamber under some flow conditions, is recommended. This alternative provides the following ' improvements: 1. Grease accumulation is expected to be reduced by removing the reducer that was � located downstream of the flow meter. 2. Flow meter accuracy will be improved by providing the lengths of straight pipe � recommended by the meter manufacturer upstream and downstream of the flow meter and reducing grease accumulation. � 3. A positive, reliable means of isolating the flow meter for maintenance and repair will be provided by installing valves upstream and downstream of the flow meter. 4. Sampling reliability is expected to be unproved by reducing grease accumulation. ' J:\S\S1526\MEMO\Technical Memo-final 2-7-07.doc , -16- , � , T' he&Bond �9 ' TABLE 5 Soil Analytical Results ' Peabody Metering Station Improvements Project Sample Identification B-1 (8-10) B-7 (10-12) B-1 (16-18) Reportable , Sample Depth (feet) 8-10 10-12 16-18 Concentration5 for , RCS-1 Paremeters/Date Sampled 72127/2006 12127I2006 12/27/2006 Hexavalent Chromium , Chromium, Hexavalent NA U (0.93) U (0.93) 30 Polvcvclic Aromatic Hvdrocarbons(PAHs) ' Target PAHs � NA � NA U (0.390) CS RCRA 8 Me[als ' Arsenic 7.3 10 23�6� 20 Barium 19 19 22 1,000 Cadmium U (0.46) U (0.46) 0.53 2 ' Chromium(trivalent) 47 48 120 1,000 Lead 18 110 67 300 Mercury U (0.09) U (0.09) 0.14 20 Selenium U (2.3) U (2.3) U (2.3) 400 , Silver U (0.46) U (0.46) U (0.46) 100 (1) All values are reported in milligrams-per-kilogram (mg/kg),which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm) ' (2) U ()indicates the compound was not detected at the detection limit shown in parenthesis. (3) Boxed result indicates an exceedence of one br more applicable standard. (4) NA indicates not analyzed - (5) CS-compound specific 1 (6) A subsequent microscopic analysis of Sample B-1 (16-18 ft.)revealed the presence of coal and coal ash. Arsenic associated with coal and coal ash is not repoAable under 310 CMR 40.0317(9), despite the fact that the RCS-1 standard was exceeded. ' ' , � ' ' � , J:\S\515261DATA\Soil&GW Test Data.xls/Soil Data � 1/26/2007 ' ` I � Tighe&Bond ' TABLE 6 Groundwater Analytical Results , Peabody Metering Station Improvements Project Reportable Sample Identification MW-1 Concentretions for , ParameterslDate Sampled 1/4/2007 RCGW-7 Hexavalent Chromium Chromium, Hexavalent U (0.01) 0.1 ' Polycvclic Aromatic Hvdrocar6ons(PAHs1 2-Chloronaphthalene U (0.0002) NL ' 2-Methylnaphthalene . U (0.0002) 0.01 ' Acenaphthene U (0.0002) 0.02 Acenaphthylene U (0.0002) 0.3 Anthracene U (0.0002) 2 ' Benzo(a)anthracene U (0.0002) 0.001 Benzo(a)pyrene U (0.0002) 0.0002 Benzo(b)fluoranthene U (0.0002) 0.001 , Benzo(ghi)perylene U (0.0002) 0.3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene U (0.0002) 0.001 Chrysene U (0.0002) 0.002 , Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U (0.0002) 0.0005 Fluoranthene U (0.0002) 0.09 Fluorene U (0.0002) 0.3 ' Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene U (0.0002) 0.0005 Naphthalene U (0.0002) 0.14 Phenanthrene U (0.0002) 0.05 � Pyrene U (0.0002) 0.02 bissolved RCR,4 8 Metals ' Arsenic, Dissolved 0.006 0.01 ' Barium, Dissolved 0.058 2 Cadmium, Dissolved U (0.004) 0.004 - Chromium, Dissolved U (0.01) 0.1 � ' Lead, Dissolved U (0.01) 0.02 Mercury, Dissolved U (0.0002) 0.002 Selenium, Dissolved U (0.01) 0.05 , Silver, Dissolved U (0.007) 0.007 (1) All values are reported in milligrams-per-liter(mg/L),which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm). (2) U ( ) indicates the compound was not detected at the detection limit shown in parenthesis. , (3) Boxed result indicates an exceedence of one or more applicable standard. (4) NL - Not Listed ' ' � J:\S\S1526\DATA\Soil&GW Test Data.xls/GW Dala � 1/26/2007 � � � � � r � � � � � � �1 � r � i r � Tighe&Bond TABLE 7 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Costs-Alternative 2A(Figure 7) . Peabody Metering Station Improvements Material Labor&Equipment � Total Item Quantity Unit Price Material Cost Unit Price Installation Cost Unit Price Total Cost 36-Inch Ductile Iron Pipe 30 If --- $26,700 --- $10,680 --- $37,380 ' � 36-Inch Flange Adapter 1 each $5,100 /each $5,100 $2,000 /each $2,000 $7,100 /each $7,100 36-Inch Knife Gate Valve 2 each $25,000 /each $50,000 $10,000 /each $20,000 $35,000 /each $70,000 Relocate Magnetic Flow Meter�2� 1 each $1,000 /each $1,000 $2,000 /each $2,000 $3,000 /each $3,000 Excavation, Backfill &Compaction 50 cy $0 /cy $0 $50 /cy $2,500 $50 /cy $2,500 Pavement Repair 20 sy $50 /sy $1,000 . Removal&Disposal of Excavated Soils 50 cy $100 /cy $5,000 - Gravel Borrow 50 cy $30 /cy $1,500 Temporary dam at Structure M 1 each $20,000 /each $20,000 4" Plug Valve � 1 each $400 /each $400 $400 /each $400 $800 /each $800 36-inch 11-1/4 Degree Ductile Iron Bends 1 each $3,100 /each $3,100 $1,240 /each $1,240 $4,340 /each $4,340 Cored Hole for 36-Inch Pipe 2 each $1,300 leach $2,600 $520 /each $1,040 $1,820 /each $3,640 Cored Hole for Valve Operator - 1 each $200 /each $200 $80 /each $SO $280 /each � $280 36"Link-Seals 4 each $450 /each $1,800 $180 /each $720 $630 /each $2,520 Subtotal , $159,060 Overhead&Profit(15%) $23,860 Subtotal $782,920 Contingencies(20%) $36,600 Estimated Construction Cost � 5219�5z� �� Sa $219,500 (1) Costs are based on an October 2006 Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index of 7883. (2) Includes cost to remove, clean,temporarily store,and reinstall flow meter and associated controls, including new conduit and wiring required for the meter relocation. J:\S\S1526\DATA\Improvement Costs.xls/AIt2A 2/7/2007 � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 � r � � � � Tighe&Bond TABLE 8 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Costs-Alternative 4 (Figure 5) Peabody Metering Station Improvements Material � Labor& Equipment Total Item Quantity Unit Price Material Cost Unit Price Installation Cost Unit Price Total Cost 36-Inch Ductile Iron Pipe 25 If --- $21,400 --- $8,560 --- $29,960 24-Inch Ductile Iron Pipe 5 If --- $6,800 --- $2,720 --- $9,520 36-inch 45 Degree Ductile Iron MJ x MJ Bends 2 each $8,600 /each $17,200 $3,440 /each $6,880 $12,040 /each $24,080 24-Inch Knife Gate Valve 1 each $15,000 /each $15,000 $6,000 /each $6,000 $21,000 /each $21,000 36 x 24 Reducing Tee w/36" Blind Flange 1 each $15,800 /each $15,800 $6,320 /each $6,320 $22,120 /each $22,120 36-Inch Couplings 2 each $1,200 /each $2,400 $480 /each $960 $1,680 /each $3,360 36-Inch Link-Seal 6 each $450 /each $2,700 $180 /each $1,080 $630 /each $3,780 Relocate Magnetic Flow Meter�'� 1 each $5,000 /each $5,000 $3,000 /each $3,000 $8,000 /each $8,000 Aluminum slide gate 1 each � $4,000 leach $4,000 $1,600 /each $1,600 $5,600 /each $5,600 Excavation, Backfill &Compaction 400 cy $0 /cy $0 $50 /cy $20,000 $50 /cy $20,000 Concrete Removal and Disposal , 24 cy � $0 /cy $0 $200 /cy $4,815 $200 /cy $4,815 Temporary dam at Structure M 1 each $20,000 /each $20,000 Precast Conc. Grease Trap Chamber(5'x 5'x 18')�2� 1 each $15,000 /each $15,000 $6,000 /each $6,000 $21,000 /each $21,000 Precast Conc. Metering Chamber(10'dia x 19')�z� 1 each $28,000 /each $28;000 $11,200 /each . $11,200 $39,200 /each $39,200 Subtotal $133,300 $79,135 $232,435 Overhead & Profit(15%) $34,870 Subtotal $267,305 Contingencies (20%) $53,500 , Estimated Construction Cost $320,805 �� Say � $320,800 (1) Costs are based on an October 2006 Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index of 7883. (2) Includes cost of precast concrete structure and appurtenances, such as hatches and manhole covers. (3) Includes cost to remove, clean, temporarily store, and reinstall flow meter and associated controls, including new conduit and wiring required for the meter relocation. J:\S\S1526\DATA\Improvement Costs.xls/AIt4 2/7/2007 ' '1 lNLE7 CHANNEL OF ' DECOMMlSS10NED GREASE AND GRIT CHAMBER EL 16.50 '' 78" RC — FROM EL13.67 TOP OF CENTER WALL S7RUCTURE N ' ' . lNV EL 2.33 �METERING CHAMBER � 36" Dl ' EL 4.30 . . e 36" Cl �\------------------------------------------------------------------- i �--r---- : EL 1.50 �\ � i � � + EL 0.00 ' — ---<— ------------------------------------------------------------------ - i .\' --�----i-------- --> ____________________________ ____________ _ , .,.. --�----�------ ��/ ' .' EL —3.77 i i ' SECTION A-A ' �p��o' l ' ' METERING CHAMBER SkS� HATCH ' NOTE: EL �5.5 HARMONY GROI/E ROAD 1. CORE HOLE IN BASEMENT FLANGED ADAPTER . ; " WALL FOR SIDE—MOUNTED PROPOSED 36 DI PIPE i � VALVE OPERATOR. � �s" INTERCEPTOR EL 7.33 3s" oi SAMPLING PORT � � STRUCTURE M i i � — — — -- - � _ � EL 1.50 � � ' EL 2.04 EL 2.52 EL 0.75 1 I EL —3.17 � i i I ; 3s" ci 15'(MIN) 6'(MIN f1Y4 BE(�I� --J FIGURE 7 1 , r-- �----- — ---- — -------------- --i--� ALTERNATIVE 2A- ELIMINATE REDUCER KNIFE GATE VALVE RELOCATED KNIFE GATE VALVE IN METERING CHAMBER , SEE NOTE 1 FLOW ETER METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES REPLACE EXISTING 4" DRAIN SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT � SECTION B�B SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ��—��, TIGHE 8 BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS WESTFIELD, MASSACHUSEiTS ' - SCALE: 1"=1tl . OATE: OCTOBER 2008 51526\FlGURE7 , ` ' , �� , �a" Rc iNrERCEPnNc sEwER I-I'�RM�NY GROVE RpAD - , — - _ _ _ PROPOSED 36" DI PIPE � 78"" RC INTERCEP7ING SEWER (BYPASS) RELOCATED MAGNETIC FLOW METER ' \ , eiruMiNous watK PROPOSED SLUICE GATE - � _ srRucruRE M -� � / � — —� _ . , FOUNDATION FROM �' a \ ' � — � _ DECOMMISSIONED FACILl7Y �� _ � _ — � — /� � i — — � . �, / — —� _ _ —�� ' � ' PROPOSED METER AND � ' SAMPLING CHAMBER / SUMP PUMP g��,yWl ' srRucruRE N iNCEr cHaNNE� oF PROPOSED SAMPLING LINE 35"X2a" REoucER DECOMMISSIONED GREASE � MAGNE7lC FLOW ME7ER BITUMlNOUS PROPOSED EXTENSION AND GRl7 CHAMBER , W/HA7CH ABO�E WALK TO STRUCTURE N � � , PROPOSED SLUICE GATE EXISTING � EacE oF Pauwc 7ERING NDONED CHAMB EXISTING PIPING i°. : ' TO BE ABANDONED MANHOLE LE a, q MPLWG PORT _ 36" p� ;p�, 3r , (LOCA7/ON APPROXIMA7E) � �,' BA�S'EMENT=, `-�" SAMPLE PUMP AND GRINDER ' =BE�OW � �` r 4 . ♦ � V — UEN7/LA7ION _ � ` � � � '� FAN ABO�E � ' �\�� BELOW GROUND � � ACCESS POR7 � , — � �I �� S7RUCIURE FROM � , / DECOMMISSIONED FAGU7Y v�OQ �✓�HA7CH ABOUE � , PN P� ' p�`O,� �� , - R\��R G 1 �\� ��Q � �"N�R�N . � ' ��\'L� G�� LEGEND � FORMER DISCNARGE FIGURE 6 , .�- G� � BUILDING ALTERNATIVE 5 -CONSTRUCT NEW PIPING & METERING CHAMBER FROM STRUCTURES N TO M ' O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS ,R; 3 i CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES A80VE-GRADE CONCRETE SLAB SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT j ' B�/Mtv�� SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS I TIGHE&BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS I � `a' UTILITY POLE WESTFIELD, MASSACHUSEITS �i ' . SCALE: 1"=2fY DATE: OCTOBER 2006 � 9526\FIGURE6 ' � ' INLET CHANNEL OF 36" MANHOLE COVER ' DECOMMISSIONED GREASE AND GRIT CHAMBER REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTiNG 36" DI PIPE ec �s.so 4'x4' ACCESS HATCH , 78" RC - FROM • EL 13.67 TOP OF CENTER WALL S7RUCTURE N PROPOSED �0' PROPOSED METERING CHAMBER GREASE TRAP ` ' ��J'(MIN F)��MI lNV EL 2.33 �ME7ERlNG CHAMBER ---- - ----- -- 36" Dl --- --- ' EL 4.30 _. . � 36 Cl ------------------------- -- ,. � . ---------------- \\ ' . _ ____ _'__ ___ _' __ _ __ �____r______________ .� } EL 1.50 ' � EL 00 � i i � <--------------------- -- - - -- -- � , \ -----------�---i---------> - - ----�---------------------- ----- -- ----- - ------ -- ------------------�----�----- ��/ .:.. r, EL -3.17 SLIDE GATE 45' BEND (TYP) �___� ' LINK SEAL (TYP OF 3) PROPOSED 36" DI PIPE RELOCATED 36" , 36" COUPLING MAGNEIIC FLOW METER SECTION A-A ' ��=�� ' S'x5� HATCH METERING CHAMBER E� �5.5 ' HARMONY GROVE ROAD , j jJ BLIND FLANGE j 78" INTERCEPTOR ' EL 7.33 36" Cl 36" Dl � � S7RUCTURE M i ' - - - - 36" Dl - - � i I � EL 1.50 � � _ _ EL 2.52 i EL OJS ' EL -3 17 i i . I I � 4" ORAIN � r---------' ' ' _______24"_KNIFE OATE`V/{LVE FIGURE 5 ----------- ---------- -----i--� SAMPLING PORT ALTERNATIVE 4 - RELOCATE FLOW METER UPSTREAM OF CURRENT METERING CHAMBER ' 36"x24" METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS REDUCING TEE CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT , SECTION B�B SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �"_��' TIGHE 8 BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS WESTFIELD, MASSACHl1SEffS ' � � .. SCALE: i'=10' DATE: OCTOBER2006 51526\FIGURE5 , � � lNLE7 CHANNEL OF ' _ DECOMMISSIONED GREASE , � ANO GRIT CHAMBER . EL 76.50 , 78" RC - FROM EU3.67 rOP OF CENTER WALL � - STRUCTURE N ' - . lNV EL -233 �ME7ERlNG CHAMBER 36" Dl ' EL 4.30 36' C/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- � �---�----------- �� + EL 7.50 � � ' EL 0.00 ' - \\\--�------------------------------------------------------- I ______________________ _________________________________________ _ . � -�---+--------> : -�---�--------• ' . EL -3J7 i i ' SECTION A—A ' i..=io' 1 ' 5'x5" HATCH METERING CHAMBER HARMONY GROVE ROAD NOTE: Et �s.s ' 1. CORE HOLE IN BASEMENT KNIFE GATE VALVE i � WALL FOR SIDE—MOUNTED SEE NOTE 1 PROPOSED 24" DI PIPE i ' VALVE OPERATOR. � 78"" lN7ERCEPTOR Et 7.33 36" D/ SAMPLING PORT � � STRUCTURE M i i ' i �L' EL 1.50 - -� � - - - EL 2.52 i EL 0.75 � E� _3.�� i i i i � ; ss' a 10'(MIN) 4'(MIN ; ,� ' i 4' ORAIN i i-- FIGURE 4 `---------------- --------- -----�--� RELOCATED 36"x24" REDUCER ALTERNATIVE 3 - RELOCATE REDUCER TO PROPOSED KNIFE GATE VALVE UPSTREAM END OF METERING CHAMBER MAGNETIC METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS ' FLOW METER CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT ' SECTION B—B SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �"_�O� TIGHE&BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS WESTFIELD, MASSACHUSETfS ' . SCALE: 7"=10' � DATE: AUGUST 200fi 57526\FIGURE4 ' , INLET CHANNEL OF � � ' DECOMMISSIONED CREASE AND GRIT CNAMBER EL 16.50 , 78"" RC - FROM EL73.67 TOP OF CENTER WALL - STRUCTURE N , lNV EL 2.33 �METERING CHAMBER 36" 0/ ' EL 4.30 � � �� 36'" C/ \__________________________________________________________________________________ �_ r_ E� �.$Q \\ _ I ---I _____________ ' � t �� E� �.�� , - --\--�------------------------------------------------------------ I I . <---- ' -�--�-------> �. i i .' .' :� - -�----�------J EL 3.17 i i ' SECTION A—A � i..=io' 1 ' . MErERING CHAMBER 5"x5" HATCH - NOTE: Ec �s.s HARMONY GROI/E ROAD I1. CORE HOLE IN BASEMENT FLANGED ADAPTER i I" WALL FOR SIDE—MOUNTED PROPOSED 36" DI PIPE , ' VALVE OPERATOR. E� �.33 36"" Dl S�AMPLING PORT i 78" INTERCEPTOR i STRUC7URE M i ' - - j_� - - _ _ 1- EL 2.52 �' EL 1.50 i EL OJS i � i � EL -3.17 � i i i � i 3s" ci 15'(MIN) 6'(MIN i ___; FIGURE 3 , `------------------ - ------- -------------- --1--� ALTERNATIVE 2 - ELIMINATE REDUCER KNIFE GATE VALVE RELOCATED KNIFE GATE VALVE IN METERING CHAMBER 1 SEE NOTE 1 MAGNETIC FLOW METER METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS BEVELED FLANGE CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES FILLER SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT ' REPLACE EXISTING SECTION B—B SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 4'� DRAIN ��_�� TIGHE 8 BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS WESTFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS SCALE: 1"=10' DATE: AUGUST 2008 , 51526\FIGURE3 ' _ , INLET CHANNEL OF - ' DECOMMISSIONED GREASE AND GRIT CHAMBER EL 76.50 ' 78" RC - FROM EU3.67 70P OF CENTER WALL S7RUC7URE N ' lNV EL 2.33 �METERING CHAMBER 36" Dl ' EL 4.30 ' . ., ., � 36' q � ------------------------ -. -------------------------------�- � EL 1.50 � � COMPACTED GRAUEL BEDDING —� � � �� + - EL 0.00 ' - \`\--�--------------------------------------------------------- � c�� 2"" CRUSHED STONE� i + '� ---�---�------�� ' ' . EL -3.77 i i ' SECTION A—A ' �"=io' 1 NOTES: , EXISl1NG FACILITY INFORMAiION, INCLUDING ELEVAl10NS, ARE TAKEN 5'x5' HATCH FROM iHE FOLLOWING DRAWINGS: METERING CHAMBER EL 75.5 HARMONY GROVE ROAD 1• PEABOQ-Y-SALEM INTERCEPTOR SEWER, STRUCTURE M AT , STATION 130+70, SHEET S-1, PREPARED BY METCALF & EDDY, INC., DATED 4/7/75. i u� � 2. PROPOSED SOUTHERN SUBCHAMBER DETAILS, 360 DUCTILE IRON i 7B"" lNTERCEPTOR REPLACEMENT PIPE, DRAWING N0. 6, ADDENDUM NO. 2, , EL 7.33 36" Cl 36"' Dl 36"x�4" PREPARED BY ATC ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., DAiED 17/21/95. 7APE ED PIPING STRUCTURE M 3. REMOTE FACILITIES UPGRADE, PEABODY GREASE AND GRIT , 36"" Dl i FACILITY PLANS AND SECTIONS, PREPARED BY MALCOLM PIRNIE � AND WESTON & SAMPSON ENGINEERING, INC., DATED 11/6/85. g' EL 1.50 � EL 2.52 i EL 0.75 � EL -3.17 i i i � I r- ' 4" DRAIN i ,---� FIGURE 2 , ` -------------- ------------- ---------1--� METERING STATION SAMPLlN6 PORT 36"'x24" REDUCER PIPE SECTIONS - EXISTING CONDITIONS � MAGNE7/C�FLOW ME7ER , METERING CHAMBERIMPROVEMENTS CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES _ SECTION B—B SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT ' ' �"=�p' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ��- TIGHE&BOND CONSULTING ENGINEERS WESTFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS ' � � � SCALE: 1"=70' DATE: OCTOBER 2006 i 51526\FIGURE2 , � , �2� , �s" Rc iNrERCEPnNc sEwER HARIv�pN�. GROVE I�p,c\D , — - � - � 78"' RC lN7ERCEP7/NG SEWER (BYPASS) � � , ` BITUMINOUS WALK �� \ - � - � _ B STh'UCTURE M �/' ' � � � \ / - � - � - - 'FOUNDATION FROM ��' �`w' � - DECOMMISSIONED FAGLI rY �� \ � ! , _`_...�-_�—__ _ — ' /'� � � - � c` � --�`_ - � � � � . - --_ _ - - - - - �---_--.-�F-�� i'�� - — �`E--_�__ ' _�- xs� . \� INLET CHANNEL OF SUMP PUMP � / _-`�\�� ' DECOMMISSIONED GREASE � Bl/MW7 36'"x24'" REDUCER � AND GRl7 CHAMBER \ . �-�-___ � MAGNETIC FLOW ME7ER 8I7UMlNOUS _ , � . W/HATCH ABOUE WALK STRUC7URE N � ---� �----_ —�_ � p EDGE OF PA�ING � � _ ERING E , , _______.�,__--�—_ --� / CHAMBE a t ' MANHOLE I \ 7 LE �` � ' �' � F � � SAMPLING PORT � -� (LOCA7/ON APPROXlMA7E) � _ 36"' p� � u � Ov ' I � � - �_ _ -�__ �co BASEMENT � � - � / r "�,�BELOW �� a� '� SAMPLE PUMP AND GRINDER�� _--�__� r � - l� � + �� i �_ � _ ' .-"h �_ , — _ ��r ; ;� �� _ , � UENTILATION� � �� '�� FAN ABO'E. � � ; T l/ / � BELOW GROUND � ACCESS PORT ' NO� D COMMISSIONED FACILl7Y v�OQ W/HA7CH ABOUE B , �� , - �ER C p.N P�' 1. SEE FIGURE 2 FOR SEWER PROFILE !�P/� / � R�v ' (SECTIONS A AND B). O��QlvP �✓ - - NpFz�N 2. EXIST1NG FACILITY INFORMAiION SHOWN IS BASED ON FIELD ' - MEASUREMENTS AND h1E FOLLOWING DRAWINGS: ��'�O� ' _ _ , - FORMER DISCHARGE A. PEABODY-SALEM INTERCEPTOR SEWER, PLAN AND PROFILE, �j��-L STA. 130+49.62 TO STA. 135+00, SHEET C-3, PREPARED BY '� METCALF & EDDY, INC., DATED 4/7/75. �j� LEGEND FIGURE 1 jB. GRIT AND GREASE CHAMBER AT SALEM-PEABODY LINE, � BUILDING SITE PLAN - EXISTING CONDITIONS BASEMENT AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL, SHEET 2 Of 20, PREPARED BY METCALF & EDDY. INC., DATED JANUARY METERING CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS , 2s, i946. O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT C. PROPOSED SOUTHERN SUBCHAMBER DETAILS, 36"0 DUCTiLE s �* � � CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES IRON REPLACEMENT PIPE, DRAWING N0. 6, ADDENDUM N0. 2, � +x- �; ABOVE—GRADE CONCRETE SLAB SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT I ' PREPARED BY ATC ENVIRONMENTAL INC., DATED 11/21/95. B)/MWl� SOIL BORING/MONITORING WELL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS . TIGHE&BOND CONSUITING ENGINEERS `a-' UTILITY POLE WESTFIELD, MASSACHUSETfS ' � , SCALE: 1"=20' DATE: AUGUST Z008 51526\FIGUREI APPENDIX A � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � I , 1 ' � � ' ' � , ' � � � , � � , � a v � m ' O x a 1 � ' � 1 ' , ' ' � � ' Appendix A ' Key SWMM Model Runs ' ' ' ' 1 ' ' 1 � � _ 1 'I'able of Contents ' Key SWMM Model Runs ' Figure No. Description A1 Minimum Flow, Existing Layout ' A2 Minunum Flow, Alternative 2A Layout , A3 Minimum Flow, Alternative 4 Layout A4 Estimated Peak Flow, Existing Layout, Tailwater Depth of-3.5 � AS Estimated Peak Flow, Alternative 2A Layout, Tailwater Depth of-3.5 ' A6 Estimated Peak Flow, Alternative 4 Layout, Tailwater Depth of -3.5 i � ' 1 , , ' � 1 1 1 1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � s Hytlraulic Grade Line Peek vetues Min Flows-Existing-Normal CmEuit100 ConEuit102 CenEui[IM ConEuiilOtl ConEuit1042 ConEui�900 ` ` � \ \ � \ � � � , I � �, . . ' � � � � � _�� : : i : \ . . .—�\ . . `. I . I I . . _ ___.."_ ' __'___.. ._ . � � � . . _ . . . .. . . _""" "t.l�.._ . ' ' .. ns — iaa n. _...._...._L_____________'_._.__._. _ nu _""'__"_'_`"'_'""_"''__""""... � � I�)8 I I : I � __'""'""""_"_""" me _: � � � .___1_"_""_'_<___ _"'_,'___- ma -- ID2 2a 10� 60 90 v��L^n.�— Y^1a�� /,�o_ �zl, Figure A1 � � i — - --- - Minimum Flows Noaem � n�oanz Noa.0 NOEe141 Node141 oazao mm.zoz n eSEEleV10�0430 Irn eSEEIe�51043 n e�i[�Ekr03�00 n eSt�EIw103100 nces Elea03�0 n eSc�Eleu03100 �3EEIex03�0225 Existing Layout Flow Meter J:\S\S7526\DATA\SWMM�Existing Conditions-Normal.xlsVullN BLOW-UP � r r � � � � � � r � � � � � � � � � Hytl�aulic Gratle Line Peak values Min Flows-Atl 2A-Normel ConEoit IW Ca\nEuic 102 ConEui�104 CnnEui[1041 \\ � V �\ `t ;` 1 �\ S � � � � _� _.—'_—. __"_.. . . ' ' . . ... .._ . . . .... . "'_""_'_'"' 116 " ------ 114 '--- 11'[ ; : _..__ uu � ---------_"-"'-------`----'_-'-"' _"_""__"_""__`_________""_"`_"_""'_"____ __'""" i0Y � ____"__.........__"__`_____"______�_____________"""""_""'"'_'______ """"__ 106 ..... � � . . . � � � . . . . . . . � ._ . �__.___. ._________ 104 . . � .. __ _ W2 ' z�i ao r,o ao mu �?o �aa �-- isn— __--��.rti� I, _ �__.-- , Figure A2 i Noaeio Noae�z NOEeN � Natle� � Notle200 Minimum Flows CWSEL.105.3 CWSEL-103 CWSEL.103.65 CWSEL=103.35 CWSEL.ID3.43 In�er[Elev.=104.34 InvenElev.=f04.9 InvertElev.=100 InvertElev.•100 IreertElev.=102 Alternative 2A Flow Meter J:\S\51526\DATA\SWMMWIt.2A-Normal.xls\MIN BLOW-UP �a� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � Peek values CanEuit100 ConUui�1021 COMuicf022 ConEui11023 GanEuit101 ConOui[Wil Contluit1042 ConEuitJ00 �` � � � � � , : �� ; '� '__—. ______..__ —__.__.. '.__._... ......._ ._'.. __".__ � ____ .... . .. _ .. .. . . _ . .. '_'__.__ �j _.__"_""" 116 _______ ua ,. ___'__"_ uz _______.__'__________________'_ �I .._._._ no , � � . ---------r ;—_._...__. `,----------�--------- ioa '_____.____`_____._____'_____._'___.L...._._..:_"'_ '_.___-___-'_-_-__.'_. ms ' ' ; ! ; ; � . .' . ._ i . .._ ' 104 � ____ .�.�' __. ._ � . . . . -� . . _ IW I 1 i i � ...� -- 100 zo ; « �� 30 � ,�,o ,.o �<„ - ��o r �mo zoo z�o Figure A3 � �" Flow Meter �% i / rvoa.io n�oe.iz Noa.izi Noa.izz Noe.a mmeui moe.uz moe.zoo Noe.zoz Minimum Flows CWSEL=10536 CWSEL.10522 CN5EL=101]8 CWSEL.103]) CNSEL.103.53 CWSEL.103.N CWSEL.1p8.8] CWSEL.10�32 CWSEL=�0325 InaertEleu=101%4 Irna[Ele¢.104.3 InwnElex=99.81 In�ertEle¢.99.8 InwttEleu=100 In�er[Elea=�00 IrnenElea.100 In�enElw..100 IneercEleu.10223 Alternative 4 J:\S\51526\DATA\SWMM\Resulls-102406Vv11N ALT4 � � Peak values C J ' � N m � OV Q /p W O V W O O Ol O N V W � a V �OO O O O H N H N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ' Ground ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ---------- --- 1"[0 Elevation ' HydraulicGrade , --------------;-�_----------------,------------------;------------------,-------------------�i ---- ns ' '____"" '_"._ itU � ' .��i _"""'_"_�'_'____'_____"___'__' ."_" tU5 I '______"'___"_'________"'_'_.__",__'_'____"""'""' '_ .___' tOG ' ' . . . . . . . . Peabody _ ' Meterin Station ---- s5 -" a0 ' ___ 25 � zi��a auuo en�n e000 inonn izr�nn F i g u re A6 , Hydraulic Grade�s t m �;v ' v a v „ v w � M1 c m -, r „ �; „ m ^ � s � �� a °° � M o W m � � °° °° Estimated Peak Flows p� � �O � O O O CO W M1 f` M1 !` !` 09 O7 OJ OJ OJ ' p� v � �i Qi Qi .�'i �i �i �i �i �i �i �i �i �i Invert� � 00 O v � O f � � (�4 N N [�Y M M M M N � a Alternative 4 � {Y O o N N N (Y [4 N N fY (Y N fY (Y N N �� r � N � ° � M a Tailwater EL. -3.5 � + + + M � � � � CO �,r N � O � � 1D l0 M C ' r �"> . � � N W 2 V Q 7 � Z J = - ..�+ G> ` � ` � C . N � 7 � � ��„ a�+ a�+ V ' T w V V � Y � � � . � � w w � � N� � � � � � � ' , � C X � = Flow Entering ' ' ' ' J:\S\S1526\DATA\SWMMIAIL 4-TWD.xIs\Peak(Factor) Flows 1 , � ` Conduds � Peak values . ' . 98 100 102 104 1041 300 302 304 306 308 310 3121 �14 316 318 320 322 324 326 330 332 �34 336 338 340 ��342 f, ! fl ,! ! �r' , / �� ', jlr rr +� i � , � ff f f 1 i / f'. � I �. j/}� /� / / � r� ' i � / . f � �f !'/ , / ! l '� 1 '�� t'f � '�• �j t� j � Ground ' --- -- -_ -------- n � l � f � ' Elevation ---�---f�---�- df-- -- �-----r�-----�x,- � Ir- -ff- �-- �y �--- --±'------- ----- -- - ---- ---- ----�- --- ------ -- ---i �-' + f I �f. ; �; rr�, ' !f ; � � ' � t � ' ; � r � � ' ---7`------y----;-r�---a----�f ---�-----P--------;Y�------- ---- --- - ---- ---- ---- --�/ -�- na 1 � � � � ;�`~1+f Hydraulic Grade ~ � �- ------- -�-- n� ' � r --- - -- -------- -------- �-- »` ----� - '- --r- r ' � t , --------'-------- .---'---'-""--"-'------------- ---- 700 ' . .�. . � . . �� . � � �. . �. '_"' 35 ' . . . __'_ =�p , ____ g5 ' �� l <� ,� �., 6�� o� ,�,o,» >o�U �` F i g u re A5 r � �' ` � �' � '' �' � '` ' � ,� ' � Estimated Peak Flows H draulic Grade $ �o iz it tat 2o0 202 zof 2as zoa 2�o ziz zit 2ts z�s zzo 2z2 zza 2zs zao zaz zaa zas zas zao zaz zaa ' 106.41 108.39 108.33 10621 105.89 105.03 105.09 104.1 103.64 103.01 101.36 100.83 100.77 99.96 99.36 98.73 97.91 97.66 9�.41 97.22 97.05 96.98 96.88 96.7 96.6 96.53 96.5 Invert -�104.5 104.34 104.3 100 100 102 10223 f01.4 100.95 10026 100.15 98.35 9823 97.68 9629 95.63 94.68 9424 93.9 93.56 9324 93.06 92.86 92.27 91.93 91.61 82.5 Alternative 2A � � C h h � � N N � � M � f� � N �� + + + � M odes � � � N � � Tailwater EL. -3.5 ' M M .4+ M � O � � h t0 t0 <y �' r G> O r a- � � � (7 W = (� a 7 x Z � w, g � _ ' w ` ` � � � � , N � ov�i � � w 2 � � � r � � a +r � 3 d 2 m � � � d d " r �'' � ` � � .. ' � � a � � � c ' � m o � �, X 5 I X � = Flow Entering ' , J:\S\S1526\DATA\SWMMWIt. 2A-TWD.xIs\Peak (Factor) Flows ' ' , ; Peak � VdIUPS � v p Q fV V 0 O V 0 W O N V 4J O V 0 OJ p N ' V Q�� M M M (�`l {`] M C� M M M M M M Cs M [`] [`� M M , Ground � � � � ' Elevation -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ -------------------'.-------------------'------------ ---- �zn - ------�-----------------�---------------;------------------�------------------�y --- n5 ' Hydraulic Grede � -------- --- np ' �i "____"'___�'___"____'____'"'_'__ '___' 105 � , I �' �� ._ . """"" ' " ________" . __'___"'_'"'""_"" '"""_"__"'_ '_'__ 100 - ' � � � b . .�. . . . : . � . .. _'" qu ' ____ 9G ' ____ "'S � Figure A4 Hydraulic Grade�-^ ^ 2ooa ^ e000 ^ eoo� sa�o ^i000� izouo hM � a m �, � ;� � � � m M Estimated Peak Flows `� ry ry , p m o rms_ � ae r; n m m c ry o ao m m m r; . 9 0 0 0 0 0 .., a o0 00 0o n n n n n m m �, � m ' � �� o � � � � � � m � pQ � Existing Conditions Q OJ O^ O � O V � � N N N M � M M [Y Q I� Z � N N fY N (Y (Y N f4 N C1 � N � H Tailwater EL• �V�� + � � + � + + + °+' + + a I M N � 0 s} + M � � � � 00 w � � ��., � T � O> h � l0 M a C 2 � p � � C9 W 2 U d � � Z � r, � � 2 «�. a� � � 0> > � � a, ` � � ` ` � � 3 � _ � c (n � � > > � � r « > � a � � w v> > > > .��. °' ` � � ` � �, b ; : t� ' �`{N. a N N Y � N � � � . �' o � � � , � = Flow Entering x , , J:\S\S1526\DATA\SWMM\Existing Conditions-TWD.xIs\PEAK(FACTOR) FLOWS APPENDIX B � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' ' , 1 , ' 1 , ' , ' ' ' ' a v v m ' _ 0 x m , � , , ! � 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 ' Appendix B , Hydraulic Grade Comparison SWMM Model vs. Spreadsheet Results ' , ' , , � ' ' , ' 1 � � � � � � � � Tighe&Bond TABLE B-1 Hydraulic Grade Comparison at Howley Street Manhole-SW MM Model vs. Excel Spreadsheet Results Downstream Boundary Condition: Critical Flow at Entrance to Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station Existing Layout Alternative 2A Layout Alternative 4 Layout FlowCondition SWMM Spreadsheet %Difference SWMM Spreadsheet °/,Difference SWMM Spreadsheet %Difference Estimated Minimum (3.5 mgd) 5.40 5.49 -1.65% 5.40 5.49 -1.65% 5.44 5.49 -0.91% Average (10.6 mgd) 6.15 6.29 -2.25% 6.03 629 -422% (1) 629 --- Measured Peak(25.0 mgd) 8.06 8.01 0.62% 7.04 7.28 3.35% 9.35 9.84 -5.11% Estimated Peak (31.8 mgd) 10.26 10.01 2.47% 8.41 8.83 -4.87% 12.56 12.96 -3.13% (1) Would not run due to model instabilties. Downstream Boundary Condition: Normal Flow at Entrance to Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station Existing Layout Alternative 2A Layout Alternative 4 Layout � Flow Condition SWMM Spreadsheet %Difference SWMM Spreadsheet °/,Difference SWMM Spreadsheet °/,Difference . Estimated Minimum (3.5 mgd) 5.40 5.49 -1.65% 5.40 5.49 -1.65% 5.41 5.49 -1.47% �. Average (10.6 mgd) 6.06 6.29 -3.72% 6.03 629 -422% 6.37 629 126% Measured Peak (25.0 mgd) 8.77 8.01 9.06°/a 7.06 728 3.07% 9.35 9.84 -5.11% I Estimated Peak(31.8 mgd) 1026 10.01 2.47% 8.41 8.83 -4.87% 12.56 12.96 -3.13% Downstream Boundary Condition: Tailwater Elevation of 3.5 at Entrance to Peabody/Salem Influent Pump Station Existing Layout Alternative 2A Layout Alternative 4 Layout Flow Condition SWMM Spreadsheet °/a Difference SWMM Spreadsheet %Difference SWMM Spreadsheet °/,Difference Estimated Minimum (3.5 mgd) 5.40 5.49 -1.65% 5.40 5.49 -1.65% 5.44 5.49 -0.91% �' Average (10.6 mgd) 6.04 6.29 -4.06% 6.01 6.29 -4.55% (1) 6.29 --- Measured Peak(25.0 mgd) 7.99 8.01 -0.25°/a 7.06 7.28 -3.07% 9.35 9.84 -5.11% Estimated Peak (31.8 mgd) 1026 10.01 2.47% 8.41 8.83 -4.87% 12.56 12.96 3.13% (1) Would not run due to model instabilties. J:\S\51526\MEMO\Copy of Peabody Metering Station Hydraulics-TTL-111706.x1s/Howley St MH Sum 1/25/2007 APPENDIX C � �r r.■� r r r■� r� � rr � � � � r� � w � r� ■■i ' � � �' � � � � �- � � � � T 2 O x e� �� ' � `!� �� ' � � W 0 r"{ r. C a10 r ' 0 � � oy ?. b � �, o � �. � � �; � � � � � � � , � I � � P � v � i G � PPOhCI: 2HR6 11•�(�� Yaq<tOF1 i IY� LOCATItl11 SES�-Solem�MA I BOp111GDilTF. 12R1200L pqNlh GROUNOSWtFqCE OIP: �OGGEIX MpA � � L S ALE O �d FicltlSarcenin8 ConwMrNmi MW4 I s I, N � 0 � � '�/�Q� � 4 d Z� T .aM1M' � I �j ' � ? &1wesNJa�edaaM1TVd ¢ w`� e PIO . ��'� ' � '� O � �m u OemJ ■ � i m p u G - � o : • c s ia OROUNOSVRiACE FLUSHMOUPITCASING I 0 0 � �pry(,qEfE000flTO0.50ft � � L1ghtGlOWlIfl0e5in0,501Ii¢Sll�ha[09mall - 0-$ 9 N4TVEf410.WXiOt30tl � gravel(Blows-;5,18 6). 2 BENiONiEi50RiO100fl i Z � LigMOmwnsantl,somesllt(BIoxS-3,]71 OW - � � encourrtera�. 2-4 6 I d I ° l � Llgblhrownenesanqsomesllt(Blows-WOMfar ._i-::f 46 -5 ' � 1T.I.�. I 8 i Z , fi Nalecovery G8 0 � I SPNDP4IX]0011101�0011 I 8 B .: SCREEN3I10M1T013.00M Li9ht 6rwm fine santl,90me sll(VaCB Sm9A grsrel(Biows-fi,3,],B).Btick,ClacksantlanC - B4a 6 eNGenceofumanoeonsnoteaatto'. - 3 10 1� ,� BlacNreryMasanQsamasllttracasmellg2ral _ �2 Z (Blaws�1p.3,1). - 12 12 � a GrayveryAnesan0,eomasilt(Blaws-2,3,6,3). _ �14 6 BOTtOM OF WcLL 13LOtt LO 13SOtt iJ >i id = I � � Greyfnesano,tracesllSsomesmall0��a1 _- - .�s 3 Q (Blows-Y.4.11) 16 NqihEFIlL13SOriT018➢IIR I 5 � - 16 I R oraynnesana,sameslltsomesmallg2vel i � '� (Blvwa-],3,1,1)Tracesof�lacksantlnoleEati6'.�::�5_�: '�a 6 �B EN�OFE%PLORNTION�te.Wll � 18.00 ENOOFE%PLORRTION � I � � 6 Za ! I I � � � ] � ' � 2J I � _ I 8 Z6 � � I � 28 � � 9 I S11 I I i � ;Z ,o � � ' onax�c �w�m.nm-er,x � Ti he&Bond <x[cMm: �m� � APPENDIX D i � A � � �� s !! � � s �, � !1� A A � � , � , � ,� ' � � a � � m z 0 � x v � � � � � � � � ' � � � � �� Appendix D � Soil/Groundwater Testing Laboratory Reports � � � � � � � � , , � 01080716:37 I �� .- WOOD3N�� E LABS � ,� � ANALYTICAL REPORT � � � Lab Number: L0700036 Client: Tighe& Bond, Inc. 1 324 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605-3936 , ATTN: Matt Abraham Project Name: SESD-SALEM � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 � , � � � � � Certifications&Appmvals: MA(M-MA086),NV NELAC(17148),CT(PH-0574),NH(200305),NJ(MA935),RI(LA000065),ME(2006012), IPA(Registration#68-03671),USDA(Permit#5-72578),US Army Corps o!Engineers,Naval FESC. Eight Walkup Drive,Westborough, MA 01581-1019 � 508-898-9220 (Fax)508-898-9193 800-624-9220 -www.alphalab.com ':�vti�, ,e,,.,,..... � Page 1 of 28 � 0108071637 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 IProject Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/OS/07 � � Alpha Sample ID Client ID Sample Location L0700036-01 B-1 (8-10) 7 HARMONY GROVE RD � L0700036-02 B-1 (10-12) 7 HARMONY GROVE RD L0700036-03 B-1 (16-18) 7 HARMONY GROVE RD , i 1 1 1 1 t t 1 Y I � I � �� l �� a � Page 2 of 28 v-�� ... , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01I08/07 � �' MADEP MCP Response Action Analytical Report Certification � This form provides certifications for all samples performed by MCP methods. Piease refer to the Sample Results and Container Information sections of this report for specification of MCP methods used for each analysis.The following questions pertain only to MCP , Analytical Methods. , An affirmative response to questions A, B, C 8 D is required for"Presumptive Certainty" status A Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with those described on YES their Chain-of-Custod documentation for the data set? � B Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified analytical methods(s) included in this YES report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet a ro riate erformance standards or uidelines? 1 C Does the analytical data included in this repoR meet all the requirements for"Presumptive YES Certainty", as described in section 2.0 of the MADEP document CAM VII A, "Quality Assurance and Qualit Control Guidelines for the Ac uisition and Re ortin of Anal tical Data"? � D VPH and EPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method run without significant modifications, N/A as s ecified in Section 11.3? , A response to questions E and F is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status E Were all QC performance standards and recommendations for the specifed method(s) NO � achieved? F Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s) reported? NO � For any questions answered"No", please refer to the case narrative section on the following page(s). � Please note that sample matrix information is located in the Sample Results section of this report. � � � � �[�c?�:�. � Page 3 of 28 , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 , Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/OS/07 Case Narrative IThe samples were received in accordance with the chain of custody and no significant deviations were encountered during preparation or analysis unless otherwise noted below. ! � MCP Related Narratives: PAH , in reference to question F: At the clienYs request, all submitted samples were not analyzed for the full MCP list of compounds specified for the Method. , Metals In reference to question F: � At the clienYs request, all submitted samples were not analyzed for the full MCP list of compounds specified for the Method. ' Hexavalent Chromium In reference to question E: The WG266522 matrix spike recovery isle outside of acceptable limits due to sample matrix interference. � ORP Due to Insufficient Volume Received the ORP Analysis was not pertormed on L0700036-02. , � , � � I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and I belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained in this analytical report, such information is accurate and complete. This certificate of analysis is not complete unless this page accompanies any and all pages of this report. � Authorized Signature: y��`'� � Title: Technical Director Date: 01/08/07 �'y Tt � � Page 4 of 28 �r�}"' , 01080716:37 , , I � 1 l ORGANICS 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 �� 1 Page 5 of 28 1 01080716:37 1 1 I 1 � � SEMIVOLATILES � � � � � � � � � i 1 � ; ��a. 1 Page 6 of 28 , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 ' Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 SAMPLE RESULTS , Lab ID: L0700036-03 Date Collected: 12/27/06 13:50 ClientlD: B-1 (16-18) Date Received: 01/02/07 � Sample Localion: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified I Matrix: Soil Extraction Method: EPA 3545 Anaytical Method: 64,8270C Extraction Date: Ot/04/07 14:45 Analytical Date: 01/O5/07 1520 � Analyst: RL Percent Solids: 86% � Parameter Result Qualifier Units� RDL Dilution Factor ' P�lynuclea AromaUc%.Hydrocarbo sb MGP„8270"Ci� ��. - , vp_��,s��W',_`�`�_.�a��,��"`��*� Acenaphlhene ND ug/kg 390 1 , 2 Chlomnaphihalene ND uglkg 390 1 Fluoranthene ND ug/kg 390 7 _... .._ _ . . __ _ . _ . . .__ _._ . .. .. ... ._.. . .... Naphthalene ND ug/kg 390 1 .. __...._ ......._ ...._ _ .. _ -_ . __ _ . ..._.. . . . . . . _ __.__ _._._._.._. ._ . . . . , Benzo(a)anthracene . ND ug/kg . _ 390 1 _._._ __._ .._._.._-_ _—__._..._ _____. _.. __.�_.___. .._.... .... ... ......._ eenzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg 390 7 Benzo(b)Fluotanthene NO ug/kg 390 1 ...__ _. ._. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .... _. .._ _ . . .. . .. .. . . . _ . . , Benzo(k)Fluorenthene ND ug/kg 390 1 � Chrysene . ND __ ug/kg 390 1 .__. ._...... __. . ..... ._ _ .. . _ ... . . ... . _ .... .. .. _ . __. . .._ . . . .. Acenaphthylene � �� ND uglkg � 390 1 __ _._ .____ __.. . ........_ _...._...__ _.___'_.._ ___.' ___. __..__....."_. ._ __.._ _ .. . ' Anthracene ND ug/kg 390 1 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND ug/kg 390 1 . . . ._ ._ . .. . .. _ Fluorene ND ug/kg 390 � 1 , Phenanthrene ND ug/kg 390 1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg 390 1 . ......._. _. ._ .._. .. .. . . . . . .... _. . _ . . _ _ .. ....... . ._. . . ... .. .. . . . . _. . _. .. .. . _. Indeno(1,2,3cd)Pyrene ND ug/kg 390 1 1 __ _ _ _ _ ___ _. _ _ . _ .__ Pyrene ND ug/kg 390 � 1 2-Methylnaphthalene ND ug/kg 390 1 , Acceptance Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Criteria Nitrobenzene-d5 63 30-130 . 1 2-Fluorobiphenyl 64 30-130 4-Terphenyl-d74 71 30-130 � � � �� =� xe�� xi 1?ia�. 3v`v*s�_�<:c... , Page 7 of 28 , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 , Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/OS/07 Method Blank Analysis , Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 64,8270C Extraction Method: EPA 3545 � Analytical Date: 01/O5/07 14:05 Extraction Date: 01/04/07 14:45 Analyst: RL � ' ' Paremeter Result Qualifier Units RDL ., .. ,�,�.�_w,_. �� : -- �- —�- --$�—�--- ��, Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbo�s by MCP„8270C to�sarnple(s�03`�Batch �WG266502 1�}•- *_w" �� . . a� '�%� cfi� — . �"«�-;.r..a ' AcenapMhene ND ug/kg 330 2-Chloronaphthalene ND ug/kg 330 Fluo2nthene � ND � � ug/kg 330 � � 1 Naphthalene N� ug/kg 330 _.. _ _ Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug/kg 330 eenzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg 330 , Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ug/kg 330 ____ . . ._._ __. _-__.__.._ _....._...... . _ ._...___....._..._.__.___.. ._ __._____ .__ ._....._...._. Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ug/kg 330 � Chrysene ND ug/kg 330 .. ........ .._. . . . .. .._.. ...__ _ ._ . . . _ .. .. _ ... _. .... . . , Acenaphlhylene ND ug/kg 330 Anthracene ND ug/kg 330 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND ug/kg 330 . . .. . . . . . _. __ .__. _... . . _ _ . . .. .. . , Fluorene � ND - ug/kg 330 Phenanthrene _ ND ug/kg 330 __- ._____ .. ___ _ .. ___ ._ . . _ .. ._ _._.___ _-__ Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND � ug/kg 330 ' Indeno(1,2,3cd)Pyrene ND _ . ug/kg 330 _.._ ... .._. . . _. _ . _. ....... . Pyrene ND ug/kg 330 2-Melhylnaphthalene ND uglkg 330 ....._._ ..... ... .. . .. ._ ...... ..._ . ... ... _... .. ._.. . .. . _. __.. , Acceptance , Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Criteria Nitrobenzene-d5 79 30-130 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79 30-130 ' 4-Terphenyl-d14 , 8fi 30-130 � I ,; 'y=�,�;�; �:,�.....,,.�.: � Page 8 of 28 � � � , � , - 0108071637 Lab Control Sample Analysis , Batch Quality Control Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 ProjeM Number. 28152&1-04 RepoR Date: 01/08IW , LCS LCSD %Recovery . Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits ..�-...:».---,...-�.,.m--n -a.z--� ----<"-'"--�."""__---e""--""�--v-,- a-^�--. . a- ai�._. - P6lynueleatAromaticHydFocarhonsbyMGP8270C.Associatedsampl�e(s);,-"�03s.B�atc�h"�WG2665022_ WG266502�3 g ,,,_;;.��,` �'vp*.�;�Y'`w..��. �� u._..��:....m�:s,.Y,,.a�,....�....�.�:.� A�napM1Mme _fi;� _ ,Tl�� 40.140 1� 30 2-Chl pM1�h I ne x�. B3 4. ... .5 82 z . 40.140 ?e. 1�`� 30 ___ - -__ .__ .. ... . _._. . ...... ' , Fw a�ma�a � �' ea ��$ ,�- 9a .:�'�-.� � eo-iao 6'�' so � ..Naph�halene .__ ' ___�.]3.�.. ._��.�6]�F 40440 9� 30 ... p� .__ ._.._. . .... , ._.. ___ . . Benzolalenma�ne E�" -�Sf>.`� +f'•_�5��'_'�S`.82{^�'`t� aa-1ao �'-+P,a.;i n. �. � 3p , .Benzola)PYrena _._ ... .. _ . E��02.3 "'.... .:. e�,'�x� . 60-160. ...... "� � _. .. ..�.. .. ... ._....._. . _ . . � Benzo(b)fiuorznt�ene ��„� �59�� 00.140 ��3� 30 Bmxo(k)fluoanlM1ene . ._.__'S"�-F B05,r,�_. '�.�`�3�,80_t��i 00.140 ._. . .. . . ��0.��_ . . . .. 30 . . . _.. .. , _AcenaPhNYlene . .. .�{�-, .,.�8�.. . l`82.�&�w+Su'$ .. 40 140 . �u��'"-� ... 90 _ . .. . . . ___' � ��.�z.�t� __ nao .. ... ___ �i� 3a Mlh2cene . . . �_rt1_�'� . 0.140. . . . �0{�.� . ... 30 _ Gt'ebY-w,•� Benza(gh�peMene ��Bp�`-.�a_ ��,y� . 40-140 P �.,4.`f� 30 Flupena ..... . .. `��,p ]B�j` �� ; Bi �,$�"' � ... 40-04�. ...... -�4�� 30 ... ' ......_._._ ___. .._ . __. .. .._ . _. ._ Phenanihrana a� 78, � .� ]B�� 4�-140 . �,t 30 Oib ( M1)aniM1rawne , 84 , ' �"��_�� E0.f00 �1� 30 .._. ._ __..___ . .___.._ _......_...... � 'bLf'wV.... . SS"`n .._ .._.__... -__ ...._ ..... ._ i�a o�ixa�a�vyre�a .��T�s� �;.��91'"�� ao-iao ��a�� ao Pyree __.. _. ._._. .__.&�80�_ �B.��c.�x_... 40-040 .___- �:..0�� ____..90 _..__ _._.._ . ' 2-MelhylnapM�alene �^�.�i,�� Tt�� 40440 ��6:� 30 � ,Page 9 of 28 ... `.'_... . '�'ci'��:a, ' � , I 1 , ` , � ' I0108071637 Lab Control Sample Analysis ' Batch Quality Control Prqect Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Numher: �0700036 Project Number: 2 81 526-7-04 RepoR Oate: 01/OSl07 ' , LCS LCSD %Recovery Paremeter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits �PoiynuclearAromatic Hydro�carborts by MCR.8270G Associaietl sample(s�03�Batch`�UVG266502=2 WG266502.3 �' -- � . ,s 'T� �.�"^�� sd... ...� ., v. ...,.+,�, . -' u.�,,..;,�i.�, �- _'. .-. �u�' m�=�. - .es;z��+�.,le�.•_ LCS LCSD Acceptance , Surtogate %Recovery �ualifier %Recovery Qualifier Criteria Ni(mhenxene-CS ]5 R 30-130 2-Fluoro�ipM1enyl B1 80 30-030 4Teryhenyl-tl10 8] B] 30-130 � , � ' 1 ,Page 70 of 28 � ;��F� , , , ' � � � a� � � � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � � 0 N W � m � D r � o�, 0 � ��.<:° 0 � ; ;°��':>� � PV . W .y',i � , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 ' Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/OS/07 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L0700036-01 Date Collected: 12/27/06 13:10 , CIieM ID: B-1 (8-10) Date Received: 01/02/07 Sample Location: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil , Percent Solids: 86% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Paremeter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method pnalyst ' -,� .x-_-.w-.�,. _.- ...,..,��.. ... x;otal Metals..ta J1dCP 600Q/7000 senes��:- � a �. ��*�s'"`-' . � . ��_ "�"�=� M1ti2 aWi£ �.�`c. .+w�s�a,�hT�t�3�S;� .9 .. r� ..siia+l�`a3a."k .'F�'. h _. .. . -�aT..,:z'. Arsenic,Tolal 7.3 mg/kg 0.46 1 Ot/0310716:00 01/O5l071823 EPA 3051 60,60108 ql � Barium Total 19 mglkg 0.46 7 Oi/03/0716:00 01105/071823 EPA3051 60,6010B AI ...... . _ .._.__.... . ._____-- ___. ___._. . ____. ...___._ ...__. . .___ ._._______ _____._ ..._.._. Cadmmm,To[al ND mg/kg 0.46 i Oi/03/0716:00 01/OS/011823 EPA3057 60,60108 AI Chromium,Total 47 � mg/kg 0.46 7 Oi/03/07 76:00 0�/OS/07 1823 EPA 3057 60,6010B AI .._.. _ ..... ......_. .. __. . . . . .. ... _ .___ . __... . . . ..__ . .. .. .. . _.. . _. . ... _ _. . _ . ._ .... _ ... _ . ' Lead,Total _ 18 mg/kg 2.3 1 Oi10310716:00 01IOSI071823 EPA3051 60,6010B AI � Mercury,Tolal ND mg/kg 0.09 7 Ot/03/0720:00 O7/04/0771:35 EPA7471A 64,7471A DM ...... ._ . ___ ... ....__ _.. ... ..__. _ _ _ . .. _ _ . .. _.. . _ _ . . ____.. ._ _._.. . .... . .... _. . . . , Selenium,Total ND mg/kg 2,3 1 01/03/0716:00 01/OS/071823 EPA3057 60,6010B AI Silver,Total N� mglkg 0.46 1 01/03/0716:00 01/OS/071823 EPA3051 60,6010B q� , � , � ' , ' ' � ' ��?Firl �..� , � Page 12 of 28 , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 , Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L0700036-02 Date Collected: 12/27/O6 1320 , Client ID: B-1 (10-12) Date Received: 01/02/07 Sample Location: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil ' Percent Solids: 86% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifer Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method pnalyst ' �.w � -Ari�ra s�, sas. r�r�s„ ,a-w � _ �._. .. - Totat Mmefa_Is�by MC yP 6000�000 senes �°��„ kr � ��.t�'�"��'`��-'>;`�,�` � y` �.,�'�� .��'��`�� Arsenic,Total 10 mglkg 0.46 1 01/03/0716:00 01l05/0718:26 EPA3051 60,6010B qi � Banum,Total .. 19 mglkg 0.46 1 01/03I07 16:00 01105/Ol 18 26 EPA 3051 60,6010B AI , _..._._.__. ..__._._._9 9__._____ _. ._ ..._.._.. ..._. .. _.._....... ...___. Cadmium,Total ND m /k 0.46 1 - 01/03I0716:00 01lOS/071826 EPA3051 60,6010B AI Chmmium,Total 48 mg/kg 0.46 1 01/03/0716:00 01/OS/071826 EPA 3051 fi0,60108 AI _ .._. . ._ ._ _ . __. ......_.. __ . .. _ _. ._. . . _ . _ _ . . . ....__ _-_._.__.... . ... . .... . _. .. . , Lead,Tolal . 110 mg/kg 2.3 1 01/03l0716:00 01/OS/071826 EPA3051 60,6010B q1 Mercury,Total ND mg/kg 0.09 1 01/03/0720:00 01/04/0711:37 EPA7471A 64,7471A DM ._._ ..._ _.. ..__. ._. . . . __._ ._ . . . . . . . .. ._ _ _. . __ ... . . _. _ .. .._.._ _.__.__ .... ..__ ._ ..__ ._ , Selenium,Total , ND mg/kg 2.3 1 01/03I0716:00 01/OS/071826 EPA3051 60,6010B q� Silver,Total ND .mg/kg 0.46 1 01/03/07 16A0 01/OS/07 1826 EPA 3051 60,6010B AI ... ._ ....._. ._ . ._ _. .. , ' ' , , ' ' , � r t; ' :�� 1.:••�— , Page 13 of 28 ' 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 , Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L0700036-03 Date Collected: 12/27/06 13:50 ' Client ID: B-1 (16-18) Date Received: 01/02/07 Sample Location: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil , Percent Solids: 86% Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Quali£er Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method qnalyst , ' .�°-,—.>w � �i • 'a+'.a� s:r-t}x ¢�a"� Total Ntetals by RAC�P 6000t70Q0 senes� ��,+, *�,�,��- „� �.x�"��'� '� - �m ,�, re.+ tiai+M�.�..,d§:� `�a"v w.00-x-7�.#:.xi .� `6 �)Y-�� 5u'tS.• � �c `. tf �' %-k� .. Arsenic,Total 23 mg/kg 0.46 1 01/03/0716:00 07/OS/0718.29 EPA3057 60,60108 qi , Banum,To[al 22 _ _ , mg/kg. 0.46 1 01/03/0716:00_ 01lOS/071829 EPA3051 60,60108 AI .______ ._ _._ ..__._. . .._......_ ._____—__ ___....__...... .... . Cadmmm,7otal 0.53 mg/kg 0.46 1 01/03/07 76:00 01/OS/07 1829 EPA 3051 60,60108 q1 Chromium,Total 120 mg/kg 0.46 1 01/03/0716:00 01/OS/071829 EPA3051 60,6010B AI _. _ . . . ..._. _ . . _ __. ._ _ ..._ _ ._. .... _ _..._ . _ .. . . __ ._.._ .. . . . .... _ .... .. .._ . . ___. � Lead,Total 67 mg/kg . 2.3 _ 1 OV03/0716:00 01l05/071829 EPA3051 60,60108 ql . Mercury,Total 0.14 mg/kg 0.70 1 01/03/0720:00 01/04/0711:42 EPA7471A 64,7471A OM ...._ .... . ___ .. . .._. _.. . .. _. . .. . .. . .. ..___ . . _. _ . _. . . ... . __... _ . . . __ .... .. .. � ' Selenium,Total , ND .mg/kg 2.3 1 01/03/0716:00 01/05/071829 EPA3057 60,60108 AI Silver,Total ND mglkg 0.4fi 1 01/03/0716:00 01/OS/071829 EPA3051 60,60108 AI . .. . _. ... ... _ . .. .. ... ._... ._... __ ._ ._ ' i , ' , ' , i 1 1 �. .: 1 � ��tih ��- � Page 14 of 28 , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 ' Project Number: 251526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control , Dilution Date Date Analytical ' Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst Tot M tal�s;b, y MCf;60001700q serres forsample(s�} �'l 3�6 ch ,wWG26fi405 1,�" ;= '��x'�: ;j, a- '3"�"�"� ' Arsenic,Total .ND mglkg 0.40 1 01/03/0716:00 O1/OS/071721 60,60106 AI __ _....__...._ _ ___. _.._. _._ _.__...__ _ ____._. . ..____. _._..... ._____ . ___... _.._.. ___. _.__....__. Barwm,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 1 01/03/0716:00 Oi/OS/071721 60,6070B AI ....... .__.. ...._.__ __.. . ..._ . .._. ...:... __.... ....9..9_.... . _. .. . . .. ._ .__._ .__.__.�. ._.. ..._ .._._.. Cadmlum,Total ND m /k 0.40 1 01/03/0716:00 Oi105/0717:21 60,6070B AI ' Chromwm,Tolal . , ND . � � mg/kg 0.40 1 �1/03/071600 � Ot/05/071721 60,60108 AI _.__ .._......_.. _ _... .__ ._.._.___ _.._ ._. .____ ._ _ _._._..__. _..._._ _ __ __ Lead,Total ND mg/kg 2.0 1 01/03/0716:00 Ot/OS/071721 60,60108 AI , Selenwm,Total ND mglkg 2.0 1 01/03/0716:00 Oi105/071721 60,6010B AI Silver,Total ND mg/kg 0.40 1 01/03l0716:00 Ot/05/0717:21 60,6010B AI ' Prep Information Digestion Method: EPA 3051 ' Dilution Date Date Analytical , Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst Total Me.et s.by MCP 60Q0/7Q00.e s3for's�ample(s)�;OT b�Baieh S WG266409 1 , ' � ;��,�,,��s.�� - Mercury,Total ND mg/kg 0.08 1 01/03/0720:00 01/04/0711:24 64,�471A DM ' ._ _. _.. .__._....__. . . ._.. ___ _ ......_... ._.._......_. Prep Information , Digestion Method: EPA 7471A ' � ' � ' � �` :;`, i.� r t� r�L�LPk+J#� � ... . .-..0 , Page 15 of 28 � _ ' ' , , 01080716:37 Lab Control Sample Analysis ' Project Name: SESD-SALEM 8atch�uality Control Lab Number: L0700036 Pmject Number. 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01lOBI07 ' LCS LCSD %Recavery Paremeter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits �T,otal,Metals by+MEP 6000l7000��senes AssociaEetl sample(s).;�Oi-Q3 �Ba ct h�WG2664Q5 2 6 405''J �-"`w� �, �"'+ �� ,�� — _.s---•-- �a 4.,,-...._...> vu_. .....s:�:.� x..�,...a�r ...am.�o-�.a,.,-_ '..a:u-..�,:+L.�... ;.-i.f-+`'"x'�".�.� ° .�_�_. ��.s�t4_-`� .,� �' ArsemcTotal . . . :,,, 9B`= �rc"-��'9T. ; ]5-125 . �1�� 30 .... ___ ...... .. ... __.... . . Banum.Total .. .. . .. . . t��g�."'! _ �?9�`�Pe� ]5-125 ��+1��c,��, 30 aas __ ' cae � .mui . . .. .-b��oo�:.��• . � ee"��e' . . �5-izs_ ._. . .. �_''��"�� _ __.. . .a° __ __ ..._...._ .. . Chmmmm,Tolai �,�,93 : �96'�� ]6125 �-�Y"�i�e 30 _ _. �> Lead Total _ �Z"��. . __. _.. .._._.��t..�i.�-' ..... ]S12B. _. �� 30 __ . _ - __. .... _. _. _. .... ___...__ , .Sele um.To�al .... . . . e:�}ip2'�' . .. �101 � .. ]Sd25 .. ��1�t�ry . . .... 30 . "Se�+i�.. -. . . _. _... SilverTotal � �y93� _ �-�s93 '�� )5125 _ "§�0,�"� 30 �Total'Metals�by MC'F 6000/70�O�series qssociated sample(s(;��01-03z`�BatcA"'�WG?66409 2-�WG28fi409 3 '��`�'�+a.i -� ��`"e � ` -- _:.:::_ . ..�_,.:.xsam...�....�.� .... ,_�.u,:�......�...,.,...,..� :x- ...... .n. -a�;.��..a;zr,..m.,y �,�`.�3�....,.t:;c...s�.. ar�K�,s.. ' Mer ry.Totai .... .. ........�+yc'107�#... �"`^'k�100�i'��,*�, i5425 . _._ . _. �"qc1'v�..�,�'�. . _.... 30 :�.: � ' i ' , � � �Page 18 of 28 '.' . L�L?FiT ' � ' , ' I � 01080716:37 1 , ' ' , � INORGANICS � & � MISCELLANEOUS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �� Page 17 of 28 f 1 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 SAMPLE RESULTS � Lab ID: L0700036-01 Date Collected: 12/27/06 13:10 Client ID: B-t (8-10) Date Received: 01/02/07 Sample Location: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified � Matrix: Soil ' Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifer Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst __.�-« --,.��--:.-�� ,w General Chemistry. - x � v - �.;�r�� ;z: �_ . _;�c� � a �� si: �m� ' Solids,Total e6 % 0.10 � 1 - 01/03/0715:50 30,2540G PD 1 � ' ' 1 1 ' , ' , ' ' 1 .','L��L?firl I ' Page 18 of 28 ' 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 SAMPLE RESULTS � Lab ID: L0700036-02 Date Collected: 12/27/O6 13:20 Client ID: B-1 (10-12) Dale Received: 01/02/07 � Sample Location: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified Matrix: Soil � Dilution Date � Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifer Units RDL Factor Prepared qnalyzed Method Analyst Hezavalent Ch ar mi�m b MCP,71' 69 A rs-�"'�� "�` �''° �" '_ _ ° -1 " v '� _ _ �� _�...,.�.... _.__. .c,,.,.....:.v Y�...._�;�.�.. .�x�.�k;sa:� .. .�• �� M s�r.� . . ' Chromium,Hexavalent ND mg/kg 0.93 � 1 01/04/0710:00 01/04/07 76:00 64,7196A JT General Cheinistry'�_ _ _. �� ,_ F � . � .. > .�-�'n. � � .��a.; , ..�,. a _.,...,.._.M _ _ _ *' �. ,,:�.� �:`:s.�;�. ��-:� •`,��' .�,"r�F� �� Solids,Total 86� % 0-10 1 = 01103/0715:50 30,2540G PD pH 8.2 SU 1 01104/062020 1,9045C DP , , � ,� �, � , � • � ' ' %.dY:?Fili ' Page 19 of 28 ' 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 ' Project Number. 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/OSl07 I SAMPLE RESULTS � Lab ID: L0700036-03 Date Collected: 12/27/06 13:50 Client ID: B-1 (16-18) Date Received: 01/02/07 Sample Location: 7 HARMONY GROVE RD Field Prep: Not Specified ' Matrix: Soil � Dilution Date Date Analytieal Parameter Result Quali£er Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst . . tiezavalenf Ct�oinwm ti MCP 7196A � � �.� - � `,.�,� `��`� - , :w � -�'„;G'.s r �,�.. y - .��,� . _.._,., , ._ �,_� m-s�< � :� �� . � ,�a,� �� x� �-� �. ;a� � Chromium,Hexavalen[ ND � mg/kg 0.93 1 01/04/0710:00 Ot/04/0716:00 64,7196A JT General Chemistry��.��^` ��f`� �"�7'�:,�,� "� ��-�W;�-"`r,a sha��"�;'�r��'; '�,�,,.`.`� . -. . ..a ,?,._ '�+�,.a:. x'3sm<, `sK»�a�r3s.�...�s.."�b.�S,��'mi�da� "'��r & 1:i�.; ' Solids,Total 86 % 0-10 1 - 01/03/0715:50 30,2540G PD pH 7.8 SU 1 01/04/062020 1,9045C DP OxidatioNReductionPotential 340 mv 70 1 - 01IO2I0721:15 68,1498 HG � � � � � � i ' , � � � %,%�L?Fir1 � Page 20 of 28 � 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control � Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst � �,��.. �r,.�._. � �.: � �ss�,� ;� �. Hexavatent Chr.omium b :MCP 719fiA for sam le s 02 A3�Batch :WG266522 1 �n _� ��• _ � ;>:"�"'�� t �� e..a��.�Y� ��,<:,x o ��,�,R�� ..�. �,,�,�. '� x�';, ' � ,�-�;.. Chromium,Hexavalent ND mg/kg 0.80 1 Ot/04/0710:00 01/04/07 76:00 '�64,7196A JT � ,� � � � � � � ' � � � � yTr c4 ...: �il� �., �' 7L�C�Fi� �^s.;.... � Page 21 of 28 � � ` � � � � '� 01080716:37 Lab Control Sample Analysis Batch Quality Control � Prqect Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number. �L0700036 Project Number: 281526-1-04 RepoK Date: Oi/08/07 � LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits � Qssocialedsample(s)x303s'�Batc� �G2662821�,� ��'��'�" �. .�. —.; � i- .,�:�:��:��..M1�,��.'�a�� x:,_'�� -� � ,ax.au�.�z. a, u._-n::�« oxiatoniaeaun'onaotenoai '�k".�p1p21� . .. _ .. ._. ._ .. . . _ . _ .. __ .__ . . ..... .... ._. ..__ . .. _... .. Hezavalent Chromium by MCP 7A��.96A�Assoaatetl sample(s):"�02 03 -.�"lBatch�,WG266522-2 WG266522 3'��r��'�a�� `�+- ,�"r.°°9�- '�z+ . sa �r�f-y::e��r�:3 sauGa�:e�Mai�'i3�;s,Jp'a4'':t,=i�a'�'�.';�:� ��Chm m H valent�� ,��_ �� ... . . �'92�... .__�__... ]5125 . . ... . �` .6_�� '^�`�- 35 Assaciatedsampie(s}j`0203�Batch WG�26&5621�� '-,_,2�� '� �� -� �,4- � -- �.��„ �� v � � �.;� � � �� ......_.�z,..Y- .,. PH. . i�,u.,.�.i'oo'"��. .. .... . _ _ _ .. ... � �' � � �Page 22 of 28 `� :,.. '.d�u't'.a. � � � � � � � � � � 0108071637 Matrix Spike Analysis �� Batch quality Control Praject Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01lOB/07 MS MSD Recovery Parameter Native Samole MS Added MS Found %Recovery MSD Found %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits Hexavalent Chromium by MCP 7I96A Assocrated sample(s 02 03�QC Batch ID WG266522-4 oC�Sample L0700036-03'"GlienhlD B 1 (18 18)"��, ,,:g �Ea"n'a..... .. ...c...�...x.'-�a^ �Xdus�cvhm ha.v�.::.. .mw�1_`m ..:. 'a'aac.xveE �...v__ vs. "' . �-3cvuar^�"..�u� ..nL^a�::� Chromium Hexavalent N❑ 1200 540 r��d5.,- 75-125 35 __ .. . �33.. ' '_ i , � � � � � �Page 23 of 28 �;L4a�;.a �� r � � � � 1 � � A01080716 37 ,� Lab Duplicate Analysis Project Name: SESD-SALEM Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L0700036 Prqect Number: 28152fi-1-04 Report Uate: Ot108/07 �aremeter Native Sample Dunlicate Sample Units RPD RPD Limits hssocl8ted sam le(s}"03'^�G Batcb ID �,WG266282 2 QG Sample L0700p36 03 ClienflD��84 (16=18)'"u"�" _ �.��.-s ..� *,,�, ..�„A� ,T';r,�. �+' t-+a�,�Y`N '.�-am a ��..._._.,_,�...�.,�..,�`._.,,,_ - ._.�._,�.�t, �,.b_..a..,,....a...r�.,-:a....,,,:.Ka...,.Y...x,.,..ecm �''�.s.;.:"�.W..�.:�.�.' �'�'d.4,tG>'?k.;r..oa .,.....,- OxitlafioNR tlu� PotenLal 940 340 . mv '� 0��. Associatedsart�ple(s�0163�Q�6atch10 WG2fi6350�1.�QCSample C0700058�02'�ClienUD.�DUP.Sampl�e: . ;.`�`-`�''��;�}�' � � -� ,ri�.-.....*.�w+.�-m..�c..-.�..�._._..,,.....,«.�.m�.x-....�,.....,_...�a.L=. s..v �., f .,d.,, ,.� .�._..._.�� . �arv-.:.^a`, fi¢..a S 'i�ax �'.'�i c SdiEs,Total 85 86 % �`�„�.,.� 20 �exavalent Chromium byMCP94.96A As�s_ociafedsample(s} �..02-03��C Ba)ch ID 5WWG266522.55�QC�Sample �L0700036 03=Ci�ent ID B 4(16.�18)�� Chmmum,He<avalenl 4G1YW µ� �MND mm ND mgMg �,, �NC'�"+ ".�^�� 35 . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . .. . . 6��:sx��u� � 'Associated sample(sj 0 Q�^QG Batyh ID,UVG266562 2�ryQC Sampte?1�.0700?27 01�wClient IDm�DUP�,ampl��`'-�.-k��'��r�� pH � 55 ry � 55 � SU �0�,$�,i i � � � � '�Page 24 of 28 :(��'�+a � � � � , , 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 Sample Receipt and Container Information � Were project specific reporting limits specified? YES Cooler Information 1 Cooler Custody Seal A Absent � Container Information Container ID Container Type Cooler pH Temp Pres Seal Analysis � L0700036-01A Amber250mlunpreserved A NIA 1.8C Y Absent MCP-7471T,MCP-AG- 6010T,MCP-AS-6010T,MCRBA- 6010 T,M C P-C D-6010 T,M C P-C R- � 6010T,MCP-PB-6010T,MC P-SE- 6010T,T5 , L0700036-02A Amber250mlunpreserved A N/A 1.8C Y Absent MCP-7471T,MCP-AG- 607 OT,M CP-AS-6010T,MCP-BA- 6010T,M CP-00.601 OT,MCP-CR- 6 010 T,M C P-H E X C R 7196-0 4,M C P- � PB-6010T,MCP-SEE010T,PH- 9045,TS L0700036-03A Amber 250m1 unpreserved A N/A i.BC Y Absent MCP-7471T,MCP-AG- 6010T,MCP-AS-6010T,MCP-BA- - 6010 T,M C P-C D-6010T,M C P-C R- I 6010T,MCP-HEXCR7196-04,MCP- PAH-04,M CP-PB-6010T,MCP- 5E-6010T,ORP-9045,PH-9045,T5 � � � � � , � � , �;Z�l:�i�i ' Page 25 of 28 ��:�`...... � 01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 GLOSSARY � Acronyms EPA - Environmental Protection Agency. I LCS - Laboratory Control Sample: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. LCSD- Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate: Refer to LCS. MS - Matrix Spike Sample:A sample prepared by adding a known mass of target analyte to a specified � amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target analyte concentration is available. MSD - Matrix Spike Sample Duplicate: Refer to MS. NA - Not Applicable. � NC - Not Calculated: Term is utilized when one or more of the results utilized in the calculation are non-detect at the parameter's reporting unit. ND - Not detected at the reported detection limit for the sample. RDL - Reported Detection Limit: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a � specific concentration.The RDL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content,where applicable. RPD - Relative Percent Difference: The results from matrix and/or matrix spike duplicates are primarily designed to assess the precision of analytical results in a given matrix and are expressed as � relative percent difference (RPD). Values which are less than five times the reporting limit for any individual parameter are evaluated by utilizing the absolute difference between the values; although the RPD value will be provided in the report. , Terms ' Analytical Method: Both the document from which the method originates and the analytical reference method. (Example: EPA 82608 is shown as 1,8260B.)The codes for the reference method documents are provided in the References section of the Addendum. � Data Qualifiers ; The following data qualifiers have been identified for use under the CT DEP Reasonable Confidence Protocols. A-Spectra identified as"Aldol Condensation Product". � B -The analyte was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank. Flag only applies to associated field samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte. E-Concentration of analyte exceeds the range of the calibration curve and/or linear range of the instrument. � J -Estimated value.The analyte was tentatively identified; the quantitation is an estimation. (Tentatively identifed campounds only.) , '� ' Report FormaC Not Specifed � � -= ;�� .a..,... , Page 26 of 28 I01080716:37 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700036 � Project Number: 281526-1-04 Report Date: 01/08/07 � REFERENCES 1 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods. EPA SW-846.Third I Edition. Updates I-IIIA, 1997. 30 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.APHA-AWWA-WPCF. 18th Edition. 1992. � 60 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements 8nd Performance Standards for SW- 846 Methods. MADEP BWSC.WSGCAM-IIA(Revision 4),WSGCAM-V C (Revision 2), WSC-CAM-IIIA(Revision 5). May 2004. ' 64 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements and Performance Standards for SW- 846 Methods. MADEP BWSC.WSGCAM-IIA(Revision 4),WSGCAM-V C (Revision 2), � WSC-CAM-IIIA(Revision 5).August 2004. I 68 Annual Book of ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)Standards following eMraction by SW-846 EPA Method 9045C under the requirements of MADEP BWSC,WSC- CAM-VIB.August 2004. 1 1 1 r � A � LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES , Alpha Woods Hole Labs performs services with reasonable care and diligence normal to the analytical testing ' laboratory industry. In the event of an error, the sole and exclusive responsibility of Alpha Woods Hole Labs , � shall be to re-perform the work at iYs own expense. In no event shall Alpha Woods Hole Labs be held liable for any incidental, consequential or special damages, including but not limited to, damages in any way connected with the use of, interpretation of, information or analysis provided by Alpha Woods Hole Labs. � We strongly urge our clients to comply with EPA protocol regarding sample volume, preservation, cooling, containers, sampling procedures, holding time and splitting of samples in the field. ;,G1c�;.�. I o:,�,a,..... � Page 27 of 28 r a■� �s � � � �■�r a.� a� � r r � -a �.■ r � � s I CHAIN OF CUSTODY 'AGE�oF� Oate Rec'd in Lab: � ALPHA Job#: �� .v�ti� � ,.,,. �. �� .o„ .,,. .... . . . . , . � � WESTBORO:MA RAYNHAM.MA • ' � � � • . . .• - . TEL 508-988-912U TE�:508-824-9300 f `�^ I\ . �t•/�� Same as Client in(o I P�#: � � FA%:SOa-898-9t93 FAX:508-922�3298 Pro'ect Name: � J v_- ❑FAK ❑EMAIL _ _ .__ ____ __ ___ ADEz ❑Add'I Deliverables � o . , Pro�ecl Location: 7 �.� `j�y,y� � ap - .- — , . '.• _ � . . • Proect#:. ZBIS� ""I �d1 '' � .ClienC � f_��a_ .__ __ ,__. � 1__ _ _ _ _ . _. - ta d Pr ram ••Critena _ ._ __ __ __ 09 ��Address: �� ye � _ _I Prolect Manager.. A/. � A�� a,y�. �� T��j�,�) �} .. /�L�9 _ �� Aa_/1 -��8� , ALPHAQuole#: , •- . - . - , • � o • i •'• • • �/� i�uL �___'t/"'G_. �Phone �7J�SZ� Z Z-(i� ,_ Yes ❑ No Are MGP Analytical Methotls Required? Fax: `��y (g� • . ❑ s �No Are CT RCP(Reasonable Confidence Promcols)Require0? I____ _��!-!�/�G—..- -�Slandard ❑ RUSH t��r��r�imm;�wa.+oo.o.�en � � � Email'. I � 'SAMPLEHANDLWG .-� Date Due�..�- (��v Time: y/ \j�i: . �, � i i i r i '��' �y � i � i Filfration �p Ttese samples have been previously aralyzed by Alpha� ( _ _ l _, ,_ . ). � � �4 � I Other Project Specific Requirements/Comments/�ecGon Limits: Q� � �� % ❑oo�e � � � � /� ot needed i / i �� h� � � .� � � � �6lodo � �� Preservafion � �i "° f � l � ❑Lab to do � , V4; �i vy ; � , ; � ��a,.,w��,e��,., Gollection �Sample Sampler's � ��.� � � � / � � � ALPFIALabID �ymplelD ��—�� "7i� Malria lnitials � � �� r �� SampleSpecifcComments (Lab Use Only) �a�e , � __'7�'� �� _ p�� I�o �✓__a,'�� _ �_ 2;4 - E', r�+ � 4� �, J'� l 3�t .� �Y'�A ' �. _I I _ ` �C i c' i ��C'. .��lE'T-4�^L . � -JZ _y�- I �L�.'ta�— �3� � , ,' _• t�-�-'� - � ; � - —� �_ ,l� --�3 --�'_�� -��-1— ,� �b -�-- —��—j —y`�,. � �— ,--� — - -- �- �„�� - fi__ i � -r- - - - -- �_ _ , - - - _ _._ -- --- � ; -- -- _ :_-,. 1 � __- - - - - - �- _ - - -- -- - - �-- � � _ - - _- ___-_ -- - --- - _ __ ._ __ � � _ __ --- ---- � � -- - -- -- - - - - __ _ - - - _ - - , - ��_ - � � - --- - - - - � = --� � ___ � � _ �--- � , - - - � � . � ; �T _ _ I � - - - -- - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ i �I ` � � 1 � � e�pr clead � legibly and ' _�_ __ ._._ ._. .- -. ._. .- __.. .-. ..__ __. � Ccntainer Type �, I � Fleas mt y. , � PLEASEANSWERQUESTIONSABOVE! - —� �--• �r- t- , �- - � - mmpletely. Samples can not be . . Preservative ,�� log9ed in and turnaround[ime clock �'I I� IS YOU R PROJ ECT R��eFFFl.---inquishped y: � � / Dafe/Ti "� Receive : ' �� not s h unlil any amb gwties ae � � — _ _ at e'solved1aAll samples submitted aie N D e/T° e,I-rm, I � MA MCP Or CT RCP? �,�,��l�✓�—"7��O��+p- _ �� I -y�-, �b�lecttoA�lpha's PaymentTerms o _....� I _ I /y (`.:� . .� 'I..!L.2 16;- . Se rever side � _. -_ / i _ _'___ N 'i �owmw.m-mc�e�.+o-ocr-as� . ... I � ._. . . . ... _. . __ _ _. . . __. _..---- ._. . I . .__ .. _.. ._.. -..- - - - -� - -- — �- - _. .._ .....- -- o� m a � 01100715:20 �i 1 ! �� WOO-05 H E LABS � � � ANALYTICALREPORT � , � Lab Number: L0700165 Client: Tighe&Bond, Inc. 1 324 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605-3936 � ATTN: Marc Richards Project Name: SESD-SALEM I Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 � � � , , Certifications&Approvals: MA(M-MA086),NY NELAC(t 1148),CT(PH-0574),NH(200305),NJ(MA935),RI(LA000065),ME(2006012), , PA(Regisiration#68-03671 j,USDA(Permit#5-72578),US Army Corps of Engineers,Naval FESC. Eight Walkup Drive, Westborough, MA 01581-1019 , 508-898-9220 (Fax)508-898-9193 800-624-9220-www.alphalab.com 'ci�:�t;.� , ;;.�.,....,.. , Page 1 of 24 LL � , 0110071520 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 � , Alpha Sample ID Client ID Sample Location L0700165-01 MW-1 SESD-SALEM ,MA � , , � � � , � � � � , � , 'ti�i��;a �__�e;..,,.,... , Page 2 of 24 , 0110071520 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 � 1 MADEP MCP Response Action Analytical Report Certification ' This form provides certifications for all samples performed by MCP methods. Please refer to the Sample Results and Container Information sections of this report for specification of , MCP methods used for each analysis.The following questions pertain oniy to MCP Analytical Methods. , An affirmative response to questions A, B, C & D is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status A Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with those described on YES their Chain-of-Custod documentation for the data set? ' B Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified analy[ical methods(s) included in this YES report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet a ro riate erformance standards or uidelines? , C Does the analytical data included in this report meet all the requirements for"Presumptive YES Certainty", as described in section 2.0 of the MADEP document CAM VII A, "Quality Assurance and Qualit Control Guidelines for the Ac uisition and Re ortin of Anal ical Data"? D VPH and EPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method run without significant modifications, N/A � as s ecified in Section 11.3? A response to questions E and F is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status , E Were all QC performance standards and recommendations for the specifed method(s) YES achieved? 1 F Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s) reported? NO ' For any questions answered "No", please refer to the case narrative section on the following page(s). IPlease note that sample matrix information is located in the Sample Results section of this report. 1 1 1 � ��. , Page 3 of 24 ' 01100715:20 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 Case Narrative , The samples were received in accordance with the chain of custody and no signifcant deviations were encountered during preparation or analysis unless othenvise noted below. ' , MCP Related Narratives PAH , In reference to question F: At the clienYs request, all submitted samples were not analyzed for the full MCP list of compounds specified for 1 the Method. Metals In reference to question F: 1 At the client's request, all submitted samples were not analyzed for the full MCP list of compounds specifed for the Methad. , , � , , , II , , ' I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained in this analytical report, such information is accurate and complete. This certificate of analysis is not complete unless this page accompanies any and all pages of this report. ' Authorized Signature: �r�f`' , Title: Technical Director Date: 01/10/07 ��4{ :�. � Page 4 of 24 f��"•�� I, , 01100715:20 III 1 I 1 I , I 1 �� ORGANJCS � 1 1 il � � i� � � � � � � ii ' 1 ; :��ti� I ..-.=".a.. ... �� ,Page 5 of 24 , 0110071520 , ' , 1 � SEMIVOLATILES � � � � ,i � � � � � � � � ;��;a . ,,.,,........ 'Page 6 of 24 I , 0110071520 Project Name: sESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01l10/07 , SAMPLE RESULTS ' Lab ID: L0700165-01 � Date Collected: 01/04/07 14:00 Client ID: MW-1 Dafe Received: 01/04/07 �Sample Location: SESD-SALEM ,MA Field Prep: field filtered , Matrix: Water Extraclion Method: EPA 3510C Anaytiral Method: 64,8270C-SIM Extraclion Date: 01/05/07 01:00 Analytical Date: 01/06/07 22:14 � IAnalyst: RL 1 Parameter Result Qualifier Units � RDL Dilution Factor , �oly uclea�A�omaUc'Hydrocarbo` �ns by MGPi827QC=SIM '��;;-1 �.,; -, m �,�.��° `�"��`�' :�,w,.z:aa��.�...,_ . :. . .�=a�.M � .a�� .._.. , ....us'n��..,,xs��w..,�-�r'-.�."��`� Acenaphthene ND ug/I 020 1 . _ . _ . . . . _. . . . . _ . . . .. _.. .. . . . . . .. , 2 ChloronapMhaiene ND ugll 020 1 Fluoranthene ND ug/1 020 1 , NaphNalene ND �� ug/I 020 1 . ._. .. .. . . .. . ._.. _ _ .. ... . .. . . ._.. .......... .. ._. .. ... . .. _ .. . . . .. ._ ....... . , Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug4 _ 0 20 1 _____ ___. ..__. . __.____.. .... .._ . __. _.___ ._..___ .__.. _ ._.__. ....... Benzo(a)pyrene . ND ug/I 020 1 Benzo(b)fluorenthene N� ug/I 020 1 . . . . ._ _ _ . . _ .. ... . _ . . ___. ... ___. __ . ' Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ND ug/I � 020 1 Chrysene ND ug/I 020 1 . _.. . . . ... _. _. _..._.__ _ _ . . _ . .. . _. . _._.. _ . .._. . . . . . .. . .. . .. ..._ . Acenaphthylene ND ug/I 020 1 ..._ ... ._ .._ ... ..... .. ............ ..__.._.. ..__.......__ ..._ .. ._._ . __ ____._ _....__.... _._ __ . .. ..__. . , Anthracene ND ugfl 020 1 Benzo(ghi)perylene ND ug/I 0.20 1 Fluorene ND � ugA � �20 1 , Phenanlhrene ND ug/I 020 1 Dibenzo(a,h)an[hrecene ND ug/I 020 1 . .____ __._ ._ .... ......... .... . .......... . . _ _ _._.. ______. ___ .. ... .. . .._ .._ .... __ .. _ .... Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND ug/I 0.20 1 � _ _... . _ ._.....__. -_ �__ .�_ _._ _ __ -_ _- . __. .___ .._ . ._. . . . _.... Pyrene ND ug/I 020 7 2-Methylnaphthalene ND ug/1 0 20 1 1 Acceptance Surrogate °/Recovery Qualifier Criteria Nitrohenzene-d5 79 30-130 , 2-Fluorobiphenyl 67 30-130 4-Terphenyl-di4 89 30-130 . ' ' , ��l�°"s`e.`'�5 �ir`�Frll,2, � «^=�`.Nr.i ss , Page 7 of 24 ' 01100715:20 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 ' Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 Method Blank Analysis ' Batch Quality Control Analytical Method: 64,8270C-SIM Extraction Method: EPA 3510C ' Analytical Date: 01/06/07 19:58 Extraction Date: 01/O5/07 01:00 Analyst: RL 1 1 � Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Polynuclear Arornatic'Hydrocactig�s by MCP 8270�"C,SIM for�s^`am�'p�le(sj#��;01�Ba�tc�WG266569`�1'�,m�,� Acenaphthene ND ug/I 0.20 � 2Chloronaphthalene _ . ND ugfl _ _020 Fluorenthene � ND � � ugll 020 � Naphlhalene ND ug/I 0.20 , .._. _ _. ._,... ... .. . _. .... _ .. _ . . .... ..., . . _. ... .._ ._._. Benm(a)anthracene ND ug4 020 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/I 0.20 ' Benzo(b)fluoranthene . ND __ . _ .ug/I __ 0.20 __ ._........_ ._ ...... _._.. . __ _.._ - __ Benzo(k)fluoranlhene ND ug/I 0.20 Chrysene ND ug/I 0.20 _.___ _ .. _ . . . __ ... . _ . _ . . . .. . _..... . __- __.. . ._ . _ . . . . , Acenaphthylene ND ugll 020 � Anthracene ND ug/I . 020 _.__... .. . . . .. ... .... . . _ .. . ..' ' Benzo(ghi)perylene ND ug/I �20 , Fluorene N� ug/I 020 Phenanthrene ND ug/1 020 . _..___._- ______ __..__. Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ug/I 020 , Indeno(1,2,3 cd)Pyrene .. � ND . ugA . 020 . Pyrene....... .. ...... ND ug/I 020 2-Melhylnaphthalene ND ug/I 0.20 . ...... .. . .. . . . ._ _ .. . . .. _ _. . ._._ _. .. ......_ . . .. . . . .. .. _ , Acceptance , Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Criteria Nitrobenzene-d5 79 30-130 2-Fiuombiphenyl 67 30-13� ' 4-Terphenyl-d14 90 � 30-130 ' 1 ��^5 " ��;,; ' Page 8 of 24 � , � , , , , 01700715:20 Lab Control Sample Analysis ' Batch Qualiry Control Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 Project Number: 281526 RepoR Date: Oi/10l07 , LCS LCSU %Recovery Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits Polyniiclear Atomatic Hyd�a bo�s by MCP�8270C SIMFA5socia[ed sample(s).r 07 Bafch�4VG266569 2`WG266569 3��'�:; �'�;bk^�z�� ,..:.._�:...,.,...,.�ti -,�,.:..,�.�. x.m��.. - ,:m.,ys...��.s�a�,a...._�.. _... ... n - �. �.�_�-- �-�� AcanaPM1Uena ��85��.�,�', ��62 :��° d0.160 �-� 20 2-Chl p�IM1alane C�$�gqi'�"�T�_._ 7.p"83�_ _ _ 40-140 � __._ __.. . ..._....._.- _ ffi . ..... �� 20 , Fluoran�hene .. . . �� 88�� ..40440 . �... "�_- �'^�2� .. . .... .20 ... . . NaPM1ih lene _ _. .._�R�64-�;::�'a2 . . . _.__ ._pt64t�_ 40440 � a"'�`��,' 20 ...._. .... ... . ___.. ._ . _ �CR�� ., .._ __.. ....___ .. .._... .. ._ . ....... Ben o�a)aniM1racene B�g�� E�.`='_. �"x.�� 40.140 -. . _ ¢��Ytk�i�::.w 20 P ��E' ^� � Benmla)PYrene.....,. ..� s+r 110��.. �.� ... _40-140_ ��..-Y"aa:.tWt��H ... ._ ... �� .._ Benzolb)AmranNene �� -�,tOdti� .. ��10�5�� . 00-100 ..... ... �1�� 20 ..._ .._ .. Benzo(k)flmranlhene. .. .. . .__. �';�`jg4uf._ �„_�"p�. AO-1C0 ��1y�",�3� 20 _._ . C�rysene „�-.�,"-�]3�r '��69�� ... 40.14D .. .. z7y,-„�6�,� . . 20 . . . . , AcenaPhUYlene. _.. .�.. ��84��. . ��ur��"'P,T'� 40-040.. . ��0 -�T�,>'� . .. . 20. . . . . ..... ._. .. .. nnmrzceoe §a''�"-� �'�s�E�} aa�ao '�°�z ;�`".;� zo . . . . .. ,a�ifi'�x..,.ri�� .. . a-,.-u ,_ . . . . .. . ..�T. .Z_v,- . Brnzo(g��perylene � �� ,��p� . �3T�'��` C4140 �"�fi_;�y� 20 , Fimrene .._ ..... �. gx �. �ti�. . ... 40-040 .. . c�tt'J` .. _.20 _ ._._ .. . ..� . . . _ . _ . . _ .._ .__... P�enanlM1rene ��at�� ,a-�..-'�-,'�n�.....�,"�,`�'� ao-�ao �°-�5-..�? zo �ibe m( blan[M1racene . .._..._.._.. . _ _- y�89 x`,^�r,� �,,.��'�...�3�� ..__ 40.140 �� ;5 20 ' ___ .___ ..... _ ._ ._.... ... . .__ ... . .___ ..__.._. Inaeno(123-cC)Pyrzne 'k"�'�95at�` �� r 89�� a0-140 ',Y`�"] �. 20 s�a.�r..ati..,�t 6 '�.�au�>. '� �� ay.e�a .�rr��__ ��F.91 �`�;. ._ <o-iao a'�'s�: zo _.__. _. _ _ .. _.. _._ ..__....._._ . . _._,_a � .__ _ .. �� ..____.. .._'.' '_.. .._ . z-MetFylnapninalene . "�x:� �27F��.,`i�'� .x�',M1'NFO� 40-ta0 �'3�� 20 ' ,Page 9 of 24 � ,.._".... . .';i�v�;a ' , ' ' ' � , - , , , 01100715:20 Lab Control Sample Analysis ' Project Name: SESD-SALEM Batch Quality Control Lab Number: L0700165 Project Number: 281526 � Report Date: 01l10/07 ' LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter %Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits -•-_..,-•,— _'- —�___.,�_-.T,n�---,_ ..- � .__ __ Polynuclear Aromatic Nydrocarbons by MCP 82vOC SIM Associated�sample(s)�. �01 .Batch�W�G266589 2 Y WG�66569 3��,��'� _ ,,,�,..�.��.�....,;xx„�<,..,-�...�� .:.�;....,�......,..._�...;m_- ' .ma..�e.:,....,.�,.vUtti�.k.T:v.v. �3ri�.:��.3.wa ..,.�. LCS LCSD Acceptance , Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier %Recovery Qualifter Criteria Ni�mbenzenatl5 86 91 30-130 &FluomblpM1enyl 82 1B 30-130 4Te�phenyLdl4 102 100 30.130 ' , , , � �Page 10 of 24 " . [Y�2tsa , , ' ' � � � � i � � � � � � r . � � � � � � � � d � � 0 N A � m . � D r cn . o�, 0 0 : - ;.. �� N :v o :r :Y , 01100715:20 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 ' Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 SAMPLE RESULTS Lab ID: L0700165-01 Date Collected: 01I04/07 14:00 ' Client ID: MW-1 Date Received: 01/04/07 Sample Location: SESD-SALEM ,MA Field Prep: field filtered Matrix: Water , Dilution Date Date Prep Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Method pnalyst ' --�--.-r,-�.-.e m. "` .:�$ � E.-f'"` ��-."^' ,?' s.nia'� ' zfi��i� Dissolved MetaksbyfvlCP 6000/7000 se�ies- x � �-- � ��'` � ��,.�� m�.` ti��,: ��E�� -.� _� ".,re�-.�'��d.w�i�'w.a-�i-ea..W�wa . 'Lt � -.2tr` .,'�' �ie�"'.''a%' .Ti Y� �.'�cs�:Ji.'x. Arsemc,Dissoived 0.006 myl 0.005 1 01/08/0717:00 01109/071611 EPA3005A 60,60108 MG � � Banum Dissolved _ _ 0.058 mg/I 0.010 1 Ot/OB/0717:00 01/09/0716.11 EPA 3005A 60,6010B MG . ....... ....... ._.. . .. _ . . . . _ . .. _.. ._ . ._..____ ._ _____ ___._... Cadmium,Dissolved ND mgll 0.004 1 OilO810717:00 01/09/0716:11 EPA 3005A 60,60108 MG Chromium,Dissolvetl ND mgll 0.01 1 Oi/OB/07 17:00 01/09/0716:11 EPA 3005A 60,60108 MG _ . ... ___... _. .. . .. . . . . . ._ ..._ _. .... .. _. _ ._ _ _ . ...._ . _... .. _ ... ._... _ _ _ _ . . ' Lead,DissoNed ND mg/I 0.010 1 07/08/0717:00 01/09/0716:17 EPA 3005A 60,60108 MG Mefcury,Dissolved ND mg/I 0.0002 1 01/08/0716:45 01/09/07 tt:34 EPA 7470A 64,7470A pM . .._... _ . _ . .__. ._ __ . __.. . ..._.. . . _. _._. . ___. _. .. _ .. ._ ...._... .. . ...... . . _..... � ' Selenium,Dissolved ND mg/I 0.010 1 01/08/0717:00 01/09/071611 EPA 3005A 60,6010B MG Silver,Dissolved ND mg/I 0.007 1 01/08/0717:00 01/09I071611 EPA3005A 60,6010B MG ....... ... . . .. _. . _ . . ._.___ .. . .. ___ , , ' , , , ' i 1 1 i �, � ;:��►;�; , Page 12 of 24 , 0110071520 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control ' Dilution Date Date Analytical ' Paremeter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst Dissolvetl Metais by{MCP 6000I7000 senes for sample(s�Q1'Batchx�WG266803 1�'��*z =� �'*�, _ F..H.a-,�.as,.,� -�.. ��.�. ��...�F..:A.:ea..x..c�..r..w.: ��....c...Y,.�...�'w�x....u*` �v_i'c�b.,�"'�v��-Nd— . �th;� ' Arsenic,Dissolvad _ __ ND „_ mgll 0.005 7 01/08/0717:00 01109/0716:00 60,6010B MG ______. . ._ _____—___ _—.__. .___-__ ._. ___ .._. ..._....._. ....__.._. ... _ _.____. Barmm,Dissolved ND mg/I 0010 1 01/OB/0717:00 01/09/0716:00 60,60108 MG _ ..__.. . . ....... ..._ .. . __. ... .. _ _ __ . _ _.. .._.__.._ . ._. ..... _. _._.. _ _ . . . ... _.._ . Cadmium,Dissolved ND mg/I 0.004 1 01l08/0717:00 01/09/0716:00 60,6010B MG . .... . . _ . . .. .... . . . .. . . ' Chromium,Dissolved ND mg/I 0.01 1 Oi/OB/071700 01/09/0716:00 60,60708 MG. : __ _. .___._ .. ._.___.. ._.___.. _.__ ........._..._.. ..._..... ... . ..._______ .... . _.- ___ ._.._. . . _ Lead,Dissolved ND mg/I 0010 1 01/08/07 77:00 01/09I0716:00 60,6010B MG ' Selenmm,Dissolved ND mg/I 0010 1 OIIOBI0717:00 01/09I0716:00 60,6010B MG Silver,Dissolved NO mg/I O.OW 1 . 01108I0717:00 01/09I0716:00 60,6010B MG ' P.rep Information Digestion Method: EPA 3005A , Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst � . . . �'--,�»...�..-_ Llissolved Nletalws by MGP 6000(7�00 series�for sample(s)�01�BaYch�!NG266819 ?�'��,�,� ��,r�� Mercury,Dissolved ND mg/I 0.0002 1 01/08I0716:45 01/09/071121 64,7470A DM ' .._.. ... ..... . . . .._.. __ __. _._ _. .._... _ . _ . Prep Information , Digestion Method: EPA 7470A , ' ' , , , ' �� F c��l.�?F„��' ' Page 13 of 24 � � , ' , ' � �„�a�,s2� Lab Control Sample Analysis ' Project Name: SESD-SALEM Batch Quality Control Lab Num6er: L0700165 ProJect Number: 281526 Report Date: 01110I07 ' LCS LCSD %Recovery Paameter %Recavery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits Dissol,ved Mehals tiy��MCP 6000/7,000 senes-Associatetl sample(s)q 07�Batch�'WG26fi803-2 WG266803 3 +�_ -�'�"�.�.��±�,`""��„ �`.-;� '�` �x ;� .4..m .,.P..n�...., - _-: �..:.. ..c�:s��. a�,�,-_. Y�.a -�� da. ` .s..3£�£.c ,... Arsenlc,�ssolveC ��,. v�,705;;s„� �-,j_ tOBt� B0120 �3��"-��`u`� 20 ean�m os�i��a . ... .. si�;� , s . ;'� eo-i2o ... . .... .. . . . .... . .. . . .. .. �..a�: . _ _ T�� zo , .CaEmlum Dssolved_ .��y�'� ,i. 10B q.,:�.. N BO-120 _ � 20 ._ _ C�mmmm.Dissolved . `-,'��v"`�'�o� � ,_"','?"100.-�� Bo420 �utwmm+'�.�.1='y.^ .. . 20 Leatl Dssolved ' 102'..�`_..� � ��.., .10l. dg��....__ . . .Ba-120 _..... �23.�,� 20 _ ... .._......... . .. . .___ ... � . _._ . . .. .. . _ . .__... ' Sale um Dssolvetl `�F�'�oB'v�;� � 109""`�yy�+;� 80.120 .. �,�s�j'�'y5& 20 Silve.Dssolvetl . ...��9j�. b'�=_�p�. .y$ 80.120 ... ��- �. 20 ...... _ Ev u"',�2 �issqlved Metals b"�MCP 6000A7000 senes Associated sam�le s Ot�- 82tch WG26fi8'19 2'"VYG266819 3 a�"'"" �n� r�'�' -�t�- "•' ' �i M: � h.�._ � a�� t Y m�.,� ...k,�-,�,�,.,�...,..,,,�.m.�.�........�,...,,�,..,;��.�� :..,��.�,...��a. �,. sz�:��t-��'�,.,�,..�.�.,�,..c..:.��`��' ,;:' �_ � . �, . _.� , . ,� ' _Me��noissm.aa .._. �`�'',."��. _ ._ .�.�.'a�s�'�-'��,........ aaizo -__ $�u��:,_ .. za 1 1 ' ,Page 14 of 24 )��L��T ' 1 ' ' , 0110071520 t 1 , ' � INORGANICS � & � MISCELLANEOUS 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 � �� .o...,...... 'Page 15 of 24 � , 0110071520 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 ' Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 SAMPLE RESULTS , LabID: L0700165-01 Date Collected: 01/04/07 14:00 Client ID: MW-1 Date Received: 01/04/07 Sample Location: SESD-SALEM ,MA Field Prep: field filtered ' Matrix: Water ' Dilution Date Date Analytical Parameter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst Hezavalent Gfi or mium by MCP 7196q `� �` � � ��` '�' ` � "� � - °�'�''�'°` "" � ° >..�...._. ,_...,..� ._:....,. a.,_ .....,..:,..�m a:r""'' ';:': w ':z3ai ''�' ''.`:'s�"� ='��"� ' .��:_,.. � ,.,v_ ��t� �a, . '�:� �..r.��.. . �.`a_.".�� , Chromium,Hexavalent ND mg/I 0.01 1 01/04/072030 01/04/0720:30 64,7196A HG ' ' ' , ' ' ' , ' ' , ' ��L�L?Fi�l tPage 16 of 24 ' 0110071520 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Repart Date: 01/10/07 Method Blank Analysis Batch Quality Control � Dilution Date Date Analytical Paremeter Result Qualifier Units RDL Factar Prepared Analyzed Method Analyst _.-,„°w-'-�----.�� _ __ � kexavalent Gh'rom�uEn by;MCP,�x7196A{foK sample sj, 01�Batch N%G266554 1.>�-`�'"�. ��_=�`�T�=�_ --� ,�� .....-:. ,_-. a,.tas..z.s�_.,,..s,., -�.m�. _:..:d.-�.t-�,�-c,�,,,,:�ca�:..�i.:.�„ — �rcs,,.:.�...�: _ ._. _..c .�-�.-� Chmmium,Hexavalent ND mg/I 001 1 01/04/072030 01/04/0720:30 64,7196A HG ' , ' I , , ' , , ' ' ' 1 1 1 ` � � :�s � : �� <<:a,..:,; ' Page 17 of 24 , � , ' ' , , o„oo�,s:zo Lab Control Sample Analysis ' Batch Quality Contral Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Num6er: L0700165 . Prqect Number. 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 � LCS LCSD %Recovery Parameter /Recovery %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits 'He ay'alent ChmmNm b MCP 71;96A Associated sam le s��::�01�s Batch:",-"WG2fi6554-2- G2 6.43�=""� �• - � � ax..�..v a.m..,as....rYw«-._e,a�'' �..- P �,). ..�. - � =.&3atr`r.-"-.a��+.rk�� ` "r a7�.� e, cnm H xxvxiem -s 1a7"�_ �10� 90 tm �'�+�+0��.`3', zp � ' , ' 1 , ,Page 18 of 24 " ��. ',c1v�:a , , , , ' ` , 1 1 , 01100715:20 Matrix Spike Analysis ' Batch�uality Control Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 Prqect Number. 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 MS MSD Recovery Parameter Native Samole MS Added MS Found %Recovery MSD Found %Recovery Limits RPD RPD Limits Hezavalent Chiomium b MCP'=7�196Altssqciafed sam le s`:Oi'QC BAtcfi ID WG266554a pC?SBm le L0700fi65 0'I �Clienh'ID'�MW i - � � - x . _ �u�..�,�_....>:�.z�.::.. . . .�- a�_ _r� , :��-.�.r.,�..�s,.Y i»�"��,��:.-..a..w_�,c P�C�.. ,�..e....� ' _.. P __.. A�,._ .. .. . Chrommm,Heravalen[ NO 01 010 ��10*� 75-025 20 , ' ' , r r ,Page 19 of 24 ;%,�p�;q - ......,... ' ' , ' ' ` , .. � , ' o��oo��s:za , Lab Duplicate Analysis Project Name: SESD-SALEM Batch Quality Control Lab Num6er: L0700165 Project Number. 281526 . Report Date: Otl10I07 �arameter Natrve Samoie Duolicate Samoie Units RPD RPD Limits �eµavyalent�hro��umbyMCP7196AAssooiated�sample(s) 0]�uQGBatcti9D .WG2665545�QC�Sample C0700165Q7 ClienYl6 MW7—��, '?� _ �....�. �....�_..-- ..:.. _...,.,�s..�.._...._:_:i z:�.�,.,�._.v-, � .. .....,� � .:�..,_..w. �._ -i� 5 Chmmium Hexavalent N� NO m94 ��NC,��.::-: 20 ' _ .._. . _... . .. . . __ ..__ .. '1 -. ..._. ._. ' , � , , , 'Page 20 of 24 /,iSi�;� , � , , , 01100715:20 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01I10/07 Sample Receipt and Container Information ' Were project specific reporting limits specified? YES Cooler Information ' Cooler Custody Seal A Absent , Container Information Container ID Container Type Cooler pH Temp Pres Seal Analysis ' L0700165-01A Amber 1000m1 unpreserved A 6 3C Y Absent MCP-PAHSIM-04 L0700165-01B Amber 1000m1 unpreserved A 6 3C Y Absent MCP-PAHSIM-04 L0700165-01C Plastic SOOmI unpreserved A 6 3C Y Absent MCP-HEXCR7196-04 , �0700165-01 D Plastic SOOmI HNO3 preserved A <2 3C Y Absent MCP-7470S,MCP-AG- 60105,MCP-AS-607 OS,MCP-BA- - 60105,MCP-CD-6010S,MCP-CR- 60105,MCP-PB-6010S,MCP-SE- ' 60105 ' , ' , ' , ' i � . ' � . %!L�I':?li?. � Page 21 of 24 - ... , 01100715:20 Project Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 , Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 GLOSSARY ' Acronvms EPA - Environmental Protection Agency. LCS - Laboratory Control Sample: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified ' known amounts of analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. LCSD- Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate: Refer to LCS. MS - Matrix Spike Sample: A sample prepared by adding a known mass of target analyte to a specified ' amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target ana�yte concentration is available. MSD - Matrix Spike Sample Duplicate: Refer to MS. NA - Not Applicable. ' NC - Not Calculated: Term is utilized when one or more of the results utilized in the calculation are non-detect at the parameter's reporting unit. ND - Not detected at the reported detection limit for the sample. RDL - Reported Detection Limit: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a I specific concentration. The RDL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture content, where applicable. RPD - Relative Percent Difference: The results from matrix and/or matrix spike duplicates are primarily designed to assess the precision of analytical results in a given matrix and are expressed as , relative percent difference (RPD). Values which are less than fve times the reporting limit for any individual parameter are evaluated by utilizing the absolute difference between the values; although the RPD value will be provided in the report. ' Terms ' Analytical Method: Both the document from which the method originates and the analytical reference method. (Example: EPA S260B is shown as 1,8260B.)The codes for the reference method documents are provided in the References section of the Addendum. ' Data Qualifiers ' The following data qualifiers have been identified for use under the CT DEP Reasonable Confidence Protocols. A- Spectra identifed as"Aldol Condensation ProducY'. , B -The analyte was detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank. Flag only applies to associated feld samples that have detectable concentrations of the analyte. E-Concentration of analyte exceeds the range of the calibration curve and/or linear range of the instrument. , J-Estimated value. The analyte was tentatively identified;the quantitation is an estimation. (Tentatively identified compounds only.) r ' ' Report Format: Not Specifed , ,.'[�L7Fi?. ' .<....x,.,... � Page 22 of 24 ! ' 01100715:20 Projecf Name: SESD-SALEM Lab Number: L0700165 ' Project Number: 281526 Report Date: 01/10/07 ' REFERENCES 60 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements and Performance Standards for SW- 846 Methods. MADEP BWSC.WSGCAM-IIA(Revision 4),WSGCAM-V C (Revision 2), , WSGCAM-IIIA(Revision 5). May 2004. 64 Quality Assurance and Qualit Control Requirements and Performance Standards for SW- � Y , 846 Methods. MADEP BWSC.WSGCAM-IIA(Revision 4),WSGCAM-V C(Revision 2), iWSC-CAM-IIIA(Revision 5) August 2004. 1 � 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES ' Alpha Woods Hole Labs performs services with reasonable care and diligence normal to the analytical testing laboratory industry. In the event of an error, the sole and exclusive responsibility of Alpha Woods Hole Labs shall be to re-perform the work at iYs own expense. In no event shall Alpha Woods Hole Labs be held liable ' for any incidental, consequential or special damages, including but not limited to, damages in any way connected with the use of, interpretation of, information or analysis provided by Alpha Woods Hole Labs. ' We strongly urge our clients to comply with EPA protocol regarding sample volume, preservation, cooling, containers, sampling procedures, holding time and splitting of samples in the field. � , ,�/[�L?HA ' Page 23 of 24 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � CHAIN OF CUSTODY PA�E�oF�'.1i DateRec'dinla6: J � ALPHAJob#: LO � � ; �1��;� .. . . . o,,, . --.. . . � o . . . . . . .. - _ . . . N ' WESTBJRO.MA RAYNHAM,MA � TEL 503-B98A220 TEC 500�822-9300 project Name: �5 s,+q L(�{N� I ❑FAX ❑EMAIL Same as�3lient in(o PO#: � I FAX:509-898-9193 FAX'.508-922-3Z09 _.__� D__. � "" --�"' � �� oProjecl Location� s�+S�-- "y'�f-[,y�yt� �OEx ❑Adtl'I Deliverables - o Clienk �i y,.� .��QN�_ _ Projecl#: �� Ip'j _ � _ •e fed Program ,•C�iteria � _._ —. ar.� � / . ,Pro ect Mana9er. �/�72C ,.. . — .._— . _.._. —_. . ..--.__ Address: �u1 y �/hii't_S1^ .�——..—.��. (�/ZL7Ll. /L1G�— � d'C✓�r ' � I —-—�- (II�O ALPHA Quote p: � ' • � • '• • • i--lv�=r��.s��_ � , Phone:_��— Z-��_ � ' O Yee O No Are MCP Anatytical Methods Required? . . �Faz: _______ ❑Ye< ❑No Are CT kCP(Reasonable Confdence Protocols)Requiretl? � � ' ❑ S�antlatd SH�wi��oor.mxupre.owa.�en Email � i � � � % � � � � ---.- Date�Due:>� c1�,U� Time: h�� i� � i � �� % �SAMPLEHANDLWG I❑ These samples have been previously analyzeG by Abha Q � � < <J _ � � � l � % � i rl � Filfration I Other Project Speciflc Requirements/Comme ts/Detection LLLimds: Q l�yii ' l/ i i � 1 j i i i �ooneR� P+�tc�R 2 � � � / / i ❑Not needed � ( r p p ,�,�../� / [�� -�/� Q l�%� 1� �� 1 � � � � / ! � � O Lab to do / / n i. I FL/ /�z'r"`� �� r /�� v��i � l ! � � � � Preservatian , � .7i(� �i � i �� %� l i � � � ❑Lab to tlo I ��V/`�'� �' /' �� i� � i � �l l �� l Iwaase ave�ar eeiow) ALPHA Lab ID � Collection Sample Sampler's �� / I (Lah Use Only) �mplelD Date � � Tirte Matriz Initials i i l � �' ' l l � i Sample SpeciFlcComments �a o ��TC+��A/1 X x, jC ,� , � - _��-L..- � _ _ ' - �.__ �--- �----�N✓a - - - - --—-----. � — . � I� � _— _ � _--� � I � �T._-- _. � —'_ ------ —-- —— —. — - — - - , r-� ' -- ---- - -- - - _ __ ' _�- _- ------__ _ I ---- -- - -� � �__ ': � --- --- ------ �- - -- _ __ � -� ---� � r . —�"' I " — — .._ . _.. . ..— ." .' —' l. � �_� . . —�_-- � � � - -- � - � �_ _ '� __ _� __ _ ,_� _, _ - - � �____�_-__ ___ � , , _ r , ______ �__ _ _ _ - _ � � � Container Type � p � � Please prinl clearly,legibly and PLEASEANSWERQUESTIONSABOVEI -- i� - - - � �-�� - � completery. Samplescannotbe 1 ; I Preservative � � �' logged in and Wrnamund time cbck I, I IS YOU R PROJECT Relinquished 8 : � �atelTme � Recerved B � I Datertime rvill not start until any ambiguities are I � - iesolvetl. All samples submitled are � N ; MA MCP or CT RCP? ��C : - i y��_iY�� — I, 'y ��_ y�suhjecttoAlpha's PaYme��re�ms. i o I _ _ _ __ _ __ �_ � See reverse side. I � �I, � � : IFORM NO:Ot-01(iev.10-OCT-O5) I L_ _ ".__. . _"_ . . __" ____ __ __ — —'— — ._ .__ _—_ _—. —. __' � _'_.— @ a � - � i , � ; , ,.� „2,/200� • �.�� / , MiC,ROVI510N LABORATOPIES. iNC- , Alpha Woods Hole Labs lanuary 21,2007 Eight Walkup Drive PO#:L0700343 Wcstborough,MA 01581 Job#: 1755 ' Attn:PeterHenriksen Dear Peter: ' This report covers the methods and findings of the CoaVCoal Ash analysis that MicroVision laboratones, lnc.conducted on one(1)soil saznple from your project L0700343,which you submitted for this testing. The putpose ofttvs analysis was to de[ect and dceument any coal,coal ash,wood ash or asphalt present m , this soil sample, by use of a combination of microscopy tests including SEM/EDS, PLM, and macroscopic inspection. Methads: ' This sample wac dried and examined by eye and under the stereomicroscope for any suspect dark componenu ro the soiL Two types of dark suspect pazticles were separated from this soil sample and prepazed for examination by Polarized Light Microscopy(PLM)and Scantiing Electron Microscopy with ' Energy Dispetsive X-Ray Spectroscopy(SEM/EDS). For the PLM examination the suspect particle types detected in tliis sarnple were ground in a mortar and ' pestle and mounted on a glass slides in immersion oil (n=1.515) and covered with a glass cover slips. These PLM samples wece then examined at various magnification from 25X to 400X under plane,partly crossed polarizers and fully crossed polarizeis. Digital unages were taken of these particle types during this examination. ' For the SEM examination the two suspect pacticle types from this sample were mounted on a stub with double sided tape and examined under the SEM by EDS to obtain elemental data in the form of EDS spcctra. This snmplc was then sputtcr co¢tcd with gold (-200.� thick) to improvc thc SEM unaging ' properties and reexami��ed under the SEM with digital images being taken of the suspect particle types at various magnifications. ' Findings: ' Samole L0700343-01 This sample mnsisted of a brown/gray soil mix. Four(4)dark suspect particles were detected in tlils soi] sample which mocphologically fell into two(2)particle types. ' MicroYsion Laboretories,Inc. 187 Billenca Road,ChelmSfiM,MA 01824 Phone:(978)250-9909 Fan:(978)250.9901 Email:Sales@MicroVisionLabs.com , www.MicroVisonLabs.com ' ' 1 � 1 �' ' • Page 2 1121l2007 ' , During the PLM e�camination of these suspec[par[icle types it was determined ffiat [hey were oprically I consis[ent with coal and coal ash. The grounded coal particles have sharp angled edges,often displaying needle like shards. The ground coal ash particles often show the round gas voids or pazts of them,which fonn during the combusfion of the coal. The nvo PLM images below show the coal and coal ash panicles ' detected in this sample under partly crossed polazizers. , . ., • . -,; ' • � �. r • � � , � � r • . ' h ' • �, , ' •` ` ' .±. M, �- ♦ r F ' ' �,• • • ^� "b ` r " � ` . . : �. . ' - ' ��' �'• � �� " �" � � � � ' � � �' � i� .• u' �,� . z �..' . . �" . �� .;�° : . ,� _ .� . F 1...-... . `��ia,a= � . �z .._.�. ,��,_� , L0700343-01,Coal L0700343-01,Coal Ash PLM image,Partly X-Polars PLM image,Partly X-Polars ' The results for SEM and EDX analyses of these dark suspect particles were also consistent with coal and coal ash. The EDS spectra of these Rvo particles types(See Appendix A and B)were shong matches with our antluacite coal standards and ow coal ash standards. The sfrong cazbon concenhation in the Coal ' EDS spechwn is typical for coal as well as the detection of some sulfiu. The ahiminum and silicon detected are from hace amounts of minecal matter which is typically found in the coal. The Coal Ash EDS spectrum shows a sRong concenhation of silicon with moderete concent�ations of aluminum and iron along with low concentrations of calcium,manganese,titanium,potassium,carbon and oxygen. ' The SEM images are also consistent with coal and coal ash. The SEM images below show both the coal and coal ash dctcctcd in this samplc. Notc thc conchoidal frachues typical of hard coal and thc round , gaseous holes in the coal ash which aze formed during the combustio�of the coal. ' MiaoY�sion Laboretories,Inc. 187 Billerica Road,Chelrtuford,MA 01ffi4 Phone:(978)250.9909 Fax:(978)250.9901 Email:Sales@MiaoVaonLabs.com � w�w.MiaoViwnLabs.com , , , ' i , I ' • Page 3 1l21/2007 ' " _ - ;. � � Y�M I � 4 � I � lR �.:d�.ii.. I � �� ! � ' r � r . �r jr. � ..•,�r , k,'...�� . * ' ' L0700343-01,Coal L0700343-01,Coal Ash , SEM image SEM image , Results Summary Table: Sample Name Material Detected ' L0700343-01 Coal and Coal Ash , This soil sample contains coal and waI ash. Based on the number of coal and coal ash partides detected in this sample and the ease in which they were detected,the concen�ation of bottt is considered to be light. , Please leCme Imow if you have any quesfions about chis analysis or if there is any[hing else 1 can do for you. Sincerely, , I �"� l�� '-L�� . ' John H.Knowles ' President MicroVision Laborntories,Inc. ' MiaoVision taborataies,Inc. 187 Billerin Road,ChelmsfoN,MA 01824 Phone:(978)250.9909 Fau:(978)250-9901 Email:Sales@Miao�sionLahs.com wwva.MiGoV sonLabs.com ' , ' , 1 ` i , • page4 1/21/2007 , ' i,�or — --- , c � I es'a ' ' ' ' I � ez� , I i i se� � ' I ' i:, i ss� � i � ' j � ; i : , I�' I I; � a�� j i � ' Z�I,� �� !, �I � , ��I I ' I �I � . I I I 138 i ' q� . . ,, , '. . ' I I � � ��,Y� I1 p � � u• s � .,, ..�.... �� . '.,� I .�u_..W419Y71.�,Il.s�_I�IqIf�:�rlYbhY6kl�'�ei" e1 . • • � ..� .. ,E��. _ .. . I . 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8A � 10.0 ' keV(keV) Appendix A Sample L0700343-01 EDS Spechvm (Coal) ' , , ' MicroVsion Laboratories;Inc. 187 Billerira Road,Chelmsford,MA 01824 Ptrone:(978)250.9909 Fax:(978)250-9901 Email:Sales@MicroVsionLabs.com w�vw.MiaoV sonLabs.com ' , , � ` ' ' ' • Page 5 112112007 � ._._ — —__r__ . � --- -- - . ...---. __. ' $1 � � �' � �i � I j j esa � � ; I . 'I , ' � � � � '�. I f i 'I i rs7 I � , II I I i i I 631 I i i ' �i . '� I ��: �� i I � li I ; I � 505 i � ' ..�'I :, �� i : � I'I � i i i 378 i i a i , � � � ' i' I i I 2s� j , i I i ; ' I I II � 12� i Fe i �� I I il I i � I 0 K ��a�_I`,�� _ Mn I � I ' � pli_.._C.._� _ Y1�__.�II T' .u:.,�� ;._iW�W,F� . �� i 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 keV(ke� tAppendLc B Sample L0700343-01 EDS Spectrum (Coal Ash) ' ' ' , ' MicroVsion Laboratones,Inc. 187 Billenq RoaQ Chelmsford,MA 01624 � Phorre:(978)250.9909 Fax:(978)2549901 Email:Sales@MitroVisionlabs.mm www.MicroVsonL2bs.com � , 1 ' I� ' � i �i i � � i � � Peabody Metering Chamber t . � Improvements , �� Contract No. 06-2 � , Salem, MA �� -, Notice of Intent f ' �; , i , Prepared For: ' �-' South Essex Sewerage District , 50 Fort Avenue ,` 1 , PO Box 989 � Salem, MA 01970 � �� . , � , O _� � �_ ; , ' � � i , � March 2007 �-� � I `-I � i � i , ' �� 1 � � ., � - . Tighe&Bond � : , . ConsultingEngineers Enoironmental Specialisis ' . 5-1526-1-04 : Nlarch 27,.2007 . . ' Salem Consetvation Commission ' ' �120 UVashingtonStreet, 3`tl Floor Salem, Massachusetts D1970 ' . � Re: " Notice of Intent , , , Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements � _ '- Contracf No. 06-2 . Dear Members.of the Commission:. � , This Notice of Intent (NOI) is being filed by Tighe & Bond on behalf of the South Essex Sewerage District (SESD) in order to receiye authorization for, the above-referenced . infrastructure improvement project. The project is located at the Peabody Metering and ': Sampling Faciliry (the Facility) on Harmony Grove Road:(Salem Assessor's Map 16, Parcel _ 240) in Salem, lVlassachusetts. Please note the subject properry straddles the Peabody-Salem . ' mumcipal.boundary and is refened to as Parcel 135A on Peabody Assessor's Map 86. ' ' The proposed project is located in areas that are snbjecf to tlie Coinmission's jurisdiction undes the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and the City of Salem's Code of Ordinances, , , Chapter.50, Wetlands Protection and Conservation. This Notice of Intent is being filed under . both the Wetlands Protection Act and the City of Salein Ordinance. As a sewer infrastructure : unprovement project, this work qualifies for consideration as a Limited Project per 310 CMR. � . 10:53(3)(d); though-this status will not need to be indoked for the;proposed activities since the, ; ` , improvements aze exempt.from the Riverfront Area requirements per 310,CMR 10.58(6)(h) ". , ; and will satisfy all applicable performance standazds. ' We look forward to having the opportuniry to discuss this project with the Salem Conservation : Commission and anticipate being included on the Commission's April i2,2007 public hearing - ' .. agenda. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Melissa Coady at(413) 572-3224 or me at (413) 572-3264. ' ' Very truly yours, . TIGHE & BOND, INC.- � �"��, � �� , ' Todd M: Brown, P.E. Vice President 1:\S\S1526\PERMITS\SALEM\NOI Cover Letter.doc . , , _ �53 Soufhampton Road•�Wes�ld,�MA 01085•TeI. 413-562 1600•Fcix. 413-562 5317�� , � , www.tighebond.com ' � . : . . . Tighe&Bond � , . ConsulringEng�neers Enaironmental Specialists � NOI DISTRIBUTION LIST MA DEP NERO Division of Wetlands and Waterways Regulation � SESD — Mr. Alan F. Taubert, Jr., P.E. � � , . � - � � . . � . _ �' . . " ' � �` . � . . . Y .. - . , - � �1. . � .. . '� . . ' . . . ' .. . . ' � � �. .� . _�� ' . . .. �� ' . � � � . . ' , � , , .• , . . . ' . . . .. . . . . . , ' . . . . F�, .. , . . . . . .. ' '. . . � � . . . . � . . . .� _ .. . . . . , , . . � : � . �. . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . ,, . . .. . . .. .. ' ' ". � . .. . . . ' . . . . . . . . . ' � . � - '� � � . . . ' � . ' . � . ' . � . ��' � � - . ' � �. . _� �� - � �. � ' .. .. " "� .. - .. _ . . " . . . . . . ' " . '�. � . . �. � � � .. � � - . - .. . � . , �� . ' . ��. . . ' . . ^ � ' . .. � �- . . . . . . .. � . . . - . . " _ ' . . . .. �. . • . � -�(�V- . . . . ' . .. � � ' .� ' - � I �� . � •. � . ' Original prmted on recycled ppper., ` . . .,. . . .. . � � TABLE OF CONTENTS Tighe&Bond LCOVER LETTER WPA FORM 3 — NOTICE OF INTENT � NOI WETLAND FEE FORM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FORM ' APPENDIX A— PROJECT NARRATIVE SECTION 1 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 1 1.1 General............................................................................. 1-1 , 1.2 Methodology of Resource Area Investigations.................. 1-1 1.3 Descriptions of WPA Wetland Resource Areas ................ 1-1 ' 1.4 Description of Salem Ordinance Protected Areas............. 1-2 1.5 Rare Species .................................................................... 1-2 � SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Background and Purpose ..................................... 2-1 2.2 Proposed Activities ........................................................... 2-1 � 2.3 Summary of Jurisdictional WPA Alterations...................... 2-2 2.3.1 WPA PerFormance Standards Compliance ............ 2-2 2.4 Dewatering........................................................................ 2-2 � 2.5 Protective Measures ......................................................... 2-3 SECTION $ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT � 3.1 Stormwater Management Standards ................................ 3-1 , � APPENDIX B— FIGURES FIGURE 1 — USGS SITE LOCUS FIGURE 2 — DEP PRIORITY RESOURCE AREAS I , APPENDIX C — SITE PHOTOGRAPHS , � APPENDIX D— PUBLIC NOTIFICATION INFORMATION ABUTTER NOTIFICATION FORM LIST OF ABUTTERS � NOTIFICATION TO MUNICIPAL BOARDS MUNICIPAL NOTIFICATION DISTRIBUTION LIST APPENDIX E — PROJECT PLANS � SITE PLAN — PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (O1/16/O7� , � i � � ' 1 � 1 � 1 � WPA FORM 3 - NOTICE OF INTENT � 1 � � ' � '� , � ' , , � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP �`"`°^" � t` ,� � � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands , y ' 7 '�e 3 ' �' `: ;,DEP Fde Number . 3 � WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent � � ` �° ' �' �' � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 ' Documen t Transa c tion Num ber, .,.m_._._. . Salem � � CitylTown ''"P°'�"t: A. General Information When flling out fortns on the � computer, use 1. Project Location (Note: electronic filers will click on button for GIS locator): only the tab key co move your Harmony Grove Road Salem 01970 cursor-do not a.Street Address b. Ciry/Town c.Zip Code use the return , key. 42° 31'27.52" -70° 55'3.04" � Latitude and Longitude: d. �ataude e. Longitude 1/� Map 16 Parcel 240 � � f.Assessors Map/Plal Number g. Parcel/Lot Number �' ,,,,,,, 2. Applicant: Harold Newhall South Essex Sewerage District � a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company Noce: 50 Fort Avenue, PO Box 989 Before d. Mailing Address � completing this Salem � MA �1970 form consult your local e.City/Town f.State g.Zip Code Conservation 978-744-4550 978-741-0478 . Commission � h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j. Email address � regarding any municipal bylaw 3. Property owner(if different from applicant): ❑ Check if more than one owner or ordinance. � a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company , d. MailingAddress � e.CityRown f.State g.Zip Code h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j. Email address � 4. Representative (if any): Tighe & Bond, Inc. � a. Firtn Todd Brown b.Contact Person First Name c.Contact Person Last Name � 53 Southampton Road d.Mailing Address Westfield MA 01085 �. e.Citylfown f.State g,Zip Code � 413-572-3264 413-562-5317 TMBrown@tighebond.com h.Phone Number i. Faz Number j.Email address 5. Total WPA Fee Paid (from NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form): Note: This District of the � Commonwealth project is fee-exempt. $0 $0 $0 a.Total Fee Paid b.State Fee Paid c.City/Town Fee Paid � 6. General Project Description: Improvements to the existing Peabody Metering and Sampling Facility. Refer to the Project Narrative provided in Appendix A for further details. � wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/06 Page 1 of 9 1 � Massachusetts De artment of Environmental Protection Provided byDEP °'��` �� Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands � " ' ' ' " "`'°$ 3" `` �� `� � g = DEP File Number �' � ��k WPA FOrm 3 — Notice of Intent � ' -��- '� � �" � �� _ � ��,v Document Transadion Number. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem v ^ " �� . - CirylTown A. General Information (continued) � 7. Project Type Checklist: a. ❑ Single Family Home b. ❑ Residential Subdivision � c. ❑ Limited Project Driveway Crossing d. ❑ Commercial/Industrial e. ❑ Dock/Pier f. � Utilities � g. ❑ Coastal Engineering Structure h. ❑ Agriculture—cranberries, forestry � i. ❑ Transportation j. ❑ Other � 8. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: Essex 541 � a.County b. Page Number 3462 c. Book d.Certifcate#(if registered land) � 9. Has work been performed on the property under an Order of Resource Area Delineation involving Simplified Review within 3 years of the date of this application? �, a. ❑Yes b. � No If yes, no Notice of Intent or Request for Determination of Applicability may be filed for work within the � 50-foot-wide area in the Buffer Zone along the resource area during the three-year term of an Order of Resource Area Delineation, or any Extended Order, or until the applicant receives a Certificate of Compliance, whichever is later. � 10. Buffer Zone Only- Is the project located only in the Buffer Zone of a bordering vegetated wetland, inland bank, or coastal resource area? � a. ❑ Yes-answer 11 below, then skip to Section C. b. � No-skip to Section B. � 11. Buffer Zone Setback—For projects that involve work only in the buffer zone, select the applicable � adjacent resource area (check one): a. ❑ BVW b. � inland bank c. ❑ coastal resource area � The distance between the closest project disturbance and the associated resource area is: d. linear feet � wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/06 Page 2 of 9 , ' � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Prowded by DEP t �,, aE�f�u, � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands '{�' t , �" �� WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent x�' DEPFileNumber !� �� 1'E� ��._� ��_� '_��`�,�� 3j ,.i� DocumentTransachonNumber. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 " �`�, �� ' Salem � Cirylfown B. Resource Area Effects ' � �. Inland Resource Areas Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and any supporting documentation describing how the � project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: � Include your Resource Area Size of Pr000sed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if anv) document transadion number a. ❑ Bank 1, linearfeet 2.linearfeet (providea on b. ❑ Bordering Vegetated � your receipt page)with all Wetland 1.square feet 2.square feet supplementary information you c. ❑ Land Under 7.square feet 2.square feet � submittothe Waterbodiesand Department. WaYerv✓ayS 3.cubic yards dredged d. � Bordering Land 160 160 � Subject to Flooding �.square teet 2.square fee[ 0 0 3.cubic feet of flood storage lost 4.cubic feet of flood storage replaced � e. ❑ Isolated Land Subject t0 FIOOding 1.square feet 2.cubic feet of flood storage lost 3.cubic feet of flood storage replaced � t. � Riverfront area North River 1. Name of Wateiway(if available) ❑For pro�eas �.�Nidth of Riverfront Area (check one): � impaded by the rivertronc area ❑ z5 ft. - Designated Densely Developed Areas only and a buffer zone of another � resource area, ❑ 100 ft. - New agricultural projects only add 50%to the totai fee. � 200 ft. -All other projects � z. Total area of Riverfront Area on the site of the proposed project: approx. 15 200 Square Feet s. Proposed alteration of the Riverfront Area: � 160 160 0 a.Total Square Feet b.Square Feet within 100 ft. c.Square Feet between 100 ft.and 200 ft. a. Has an alternatives analysis been done and is it attached to this NOI? ❑ Yes� No � 5.Was the lot where the activity is proposed created prior to August 1, 1996? � Yes❑ No � � wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/O6 Page 3 of 9 , , Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP ^° , , � � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands �� Y �' �` „ , . � ��r , DEP File Number .,,� � WPA Form 3 — Notice of intent � � a °� �� ` �� t°� � �� 9�;DocumenbTransaction Number��. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 '``= --�-- - ' Salem City/Town B. Resource Area Effects � 2. CoastalResourceAreas: NotApplicable Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all pertormance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards � requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Online Users: � Include your Resource Area Size of Pr000sed Alteration Proposed Replacement(if anvl document cransaaion a. ❑ Designated Port Areas Indicate size under Land Under the Ocean, below number (provided on � you��eceipt b. ❑ Land Under the Ocean �_S ua�e feet page)with all 4 supplementary information you 2.Cubic yards dredged � submit to the Indicate size under Coastal Beaches and/or Coastal Dunes � Department. c ❑ Barrier Beach below d. ❑ Coastal Beaches �.Square feet 2.Cubic yards beach nourishment � e. ❑ Coastal Dunes �.Square feet 2.Cubic yards dune nourishment ,� f. ❑ Coastal Banks �. Linearfeet y. ❑ Rocky Intertidal Shores � Square feet � h.❑ S81t Mafshes �.Square feet 2. Sq ft restoration,rehab.,or creation i. ❑ Land Under Salt Ponds i.square feec � 2.Cubic yards dredged �. ❑ Land Containing � Shellfish 1.Square feet 2. Square feet restoratioq rehab. k. ❑ Fish Runs indicate size under Coastal Banks, inland Bank, Land Under the Ocean, and/or inland Land Under Waterbodies and Waterways, � above � 1.Cubic yards dredged i. ❑ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage t.square teec 1' 3. Limited Project: Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CMR � 10.24 or 310 CMR 10.53? a. � Yes ❑ No If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: � , 310 CMR 10.53(3)(d)—maintenance of sewer facility, but no need to invoke limited project status. b. Limited Projed � wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/O6 Page 4 of 9 I , , Massachusetts De artment of Environmental Protection ProvidedbyOEP �� „� n! � � p �� , �,�,�� F ��.� Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands �� ' `' � �, , DEP File Number �� , �,�t}� WPA FOPIl1 3 — Notice of Intent � �� '"� � - "� �E�� ` � � �,�;DocumentTrensachon�Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Salem fV3 ym��m ' � ciry/Town C. Bordering Vegetated Wetland Delineation Methodology ICheck all methods used to delineate the Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) boundary: oniine users: �. � Final Order of Resource Area Delineation issued by Conservation Commission or DEP Include your (attached) .�, document transaction z. ❑ DEP BVW Field Data Form (attached) number (provided on � you��eceipt s. ❑ Final Determination of Applicability issued by Conservation Commission or DEP (attached) page)with all supplementary infortnation you a. ❑ Other Methods for Determining the BVW Boundary (attach documentation): submd ro the - ,,. Department. a. ❑ 50%or more wetland indicator plants b. ❑ Saturated/inundated conditions exist Foran projeas c. ❑ Groundwater indicators affecting other d. ❑ Direct observation � Resource Areas, piease attacn a e. ❑ Hydric soil indicators narrative f. ❑ Credible evidence of conditions prior to disturbance � explaining how �p of inland) Bank tne resource s. Other resource areas delineated: � area was de''^ea�ed. D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements � Streamlined Massachusetts Endangered Species Act/Wetlands Protection Act Review 1. Is any portion of the proposed project located in Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife as indicated on the most recent Estimated Habitat Map of State-Listed Rare Wetland Wildlife published by the Natural � Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? To view habitat maps, see the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas or go to http://www.mass.qov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/nhreqmap.htm. a. ❑ Yes � No �f yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to: � Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Decembe�2006 Route 135, North Drive �' (MassGIS online) Westborough, MA 01581 If yes, the project is subject to Massachusetts Endangered Species Act(MESA) review(321 CMR 10.18). To qualify for a streamlined, 30-day, MESA/Wetlands Protection Act review, please complete � Section D.1.A, and include requested materials with this Notice of Intent(NOI); OR complete Section D.1.B, if applicable. If MESA supplemental information is not included with the NOI, by completing Section 1 of this form, the NHESP will require a separate MESA filing which may take up to 90 days to review(unless noted exceptions in Section 2 apply, see below). � A. Submit Supplemental Information for Endangered Species Review* � ❑ Percentage/acreage of propeAy to be altered: (1)within wetland Resource Area percentage/acreage � (2) outside Resource Area percentage/acreage ❑ Assessor's Map or right-of-way plan of site , wpafortn3.doc•rev. 11/30/06 Page 5 of 9 ' , � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP t- F k� °; � � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands ��n ° ' �� ,,�G DEP File Number , '�'�� Gi WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent 2 '� � � � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 ��'--�DocumentTrensactionNumbed Salem � Citylfown D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont.) � ❑ Project plans for entire project site, including wetland Resource Areas and areas outside of wetlands jurisdiction, showing existing and proposed conditions, existing and proposed tree/vegetation clearing line, and clearly demarcated limits of work*` � ❑ Project description (including description of impacts outside of wetland Resource Area & Buffer Zone) , � ❑ Photographs representative of the site ❑ MESA filing fee (fee information available at: http://www.mass.qov/dTwele/dfw/n hesp/nhenvmesa.htm) � Make check payable to "Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund" and mail to NHESP at above address Projects altering 10 or more acres of land, also submit: ❑ Vegetation cover type map of site I '� ❑ Project plans showing Priority & Estimated Habitat boundaries � B. OR Check One of the Following ❑ Project is exempt from MESA review. Attach applicant letter indicating which MESA exemption '� applies. (See 321 CMR 10.14, http://www.mass.qov/dfivele/dfw/nhespinhenvexemptions.htm) ❑ Separate MESA review ongoing. � NHESP Tracking Number Date submitted to NHESP ❑ Separate MESA review completed. � Include copy of NHESP "no Take"determination or valid Conservation & Management Permit with approved plan. ,t * Some projects not in Estimated Habitat may be located in Priority Habitat, and require NHESP review(see www.nheso.ora regulatory review tab). Priority Habitat includes habitat for state- listed plants and strictly upland species not protected by the Wetlands Protection Act. ** MESA projects may not be segmented (321 CMR 10.16).The applicant must disclose full development plans � even if such plans are not required as part of the Notice of Intent process. 2. For coastal projects only, is any portion of the proposed project located below the mean high water line or in a fish run? , a.❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, include proof of mailing or hand delivery of NOI to either: South Shore-Cohasset to Rhode North Shore-Hull to New Hampshire: � Island, and the Cape&Islands: Division of Marine Fisheries- Division of Marine Fisheries- North Shore Office Southeast Marine Fisheries Station Attn: Environmental Reviewer � Attn: Environmental Reviewer 30 Emerson Avenue 838 South Rodney French Blvd. Gloucester, MA 01930 New Bedford, MA 02744 � t. � Not applicable—project is in inland resource area only wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/O6 Page 6 of 9 ,� � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ?rowded by DEP 5F �� Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands ='�j " � '- h�� ,, � � , "DEP File Number � r�.' �� UVPA FOr'�'1'1 3 — Notice of Intent � �� °��'�'�`'�� ,. ;Document Trensaction Number! Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 `�"salem� �'�� ^ � City/Town D. Other Applicable Standards and Requirements (cont.) 3. Is any portion of the proposed project within an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? a. ❑ Yes � No If yes, provide name of ACEC (see instructions to WPA Form 3 or DEP Website for ACEC locations). Note: electronic filers click on Website. ,� b.ACEC oniine users: 4. Is any portion of the site subject to a Wetlands Restriction Order under the Inland Wetlands Include your Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 131, §40A) or the Coastal Wetlands Restriction Act(M.G.L. c. 130, § 105)? document transadion number a. ❑ Yes � No {provided on 5. Is any activity within any Resource Area or Buffer Zone exempt from pertormance standards of the �� your receipt page)with all wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.00. supplementary �nrom,ation you a. � Yes ❑ No If yes, describe which exemption applies to this project: � submittotne 310CMR10.586 h —Alteration/maintenanceofwastewatertreatment oePartment. plants and their related facilities. 6. Is this project subject to the DEP Stormwater Policy? a. � Yes ❑ No � If yes, stormwater management measures are required. Applicants should complete the Stormwater Management Form and submit it with this form. -� b. If no, explain why the project is exempt: � � E. Additional Information � Applicants must include the following with this Notice of Intent(NOI). See instructions for details. Online Users: Attach the document transaction number(provided on your receipt page)for any of the � following information you submit to the Department. �. � USGS or other map of the area (along with a narrative description, if necessary)containing sufficient information for the Conservation Commission and the Department to locate the site. (Electronic filers may omit this item.) 2. � Plans identifying the location of proposed activities (including activities proposed to serve as a I, � Bordering Vegetated Wetland [BVW] replication area or other mitigating measure) relative to the boundaries of each affected resource area. s. ❑ Other material identifying and explaining the determination of resource area boundaries � shown on plans (e.g., a DEP BVW Field Data Form). a. � List the titles and dates for aIl plans and other materials submitted with this NOI. � s. ❑ If there is more than one property owner, please attach a list of these property owners not listed on this form. s.❑ Attach proof of mailing for Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, if needed. � �. ❑ Attach proof of mailing for Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, if needed. wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/06 Page 7 of 9 ,� � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided byDEP ,�1��'�`°�; �`m'. � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands � s � ' � � '�� DEP File Number � r�S � WPA FOrm 3 - Notice of Intent # `_ � ` �� ` � ' '�� \ ��Document Trensaction Number��. Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 Saiem � ---� 'mm� � ciry/Town E. Additional Information (cont.) ' 8. � Attach NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form s. � Attach Stormwater Management Form, if needed. � F. Fees Note: This Disfrict of the Commonwealth project is fee-exempt. The fees for work proposed under each Notice of Intent must be calculated and submitted to the � Conservation Commission and the Department(see Instructions and NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form). � No filing fee shall be assessed for projects of any city, town, county, or district of the Commonwealth, federally recognized Indian tribe housing authority, municipal housing authority, or the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. 1 Applicants must submit the following information (in addition to pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form)to confirm fee payment: � 1.Municipal Check Number 2-Check date 3.State Check Number 4.Check date � 5. Payor name on check: First Name 6.Payor name on check:Last Name G. Signatures and Submittal Requirements � I hereby certify under the penalties of perjury that the foregoing Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documents, and supporting data are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Conservation Commission will place notification of this Notice in a local newspaper at the expense of � the applicant in accordance with the wetlands regulations, 310 CMR 10.05(5)(a). I further certify under penalties of perjury that all abutters were notified of this application, pursuant to the requirements of M.G.L. c. 131, §40. Notice must be made in writing by hand delivery or certified mail (return receipt requested) to all/avbutters within 100 feet of the property line of the project location. �.�enn�' 3J, erL�ia,eC 3-a.G-07 Signature ofApplicant Harold G.Newhall,Executive Director Date ' Signature of Property Owner(if different) Date —�-��. .�� 5/Z �/o� � Signature of Representative(if any) Todd M.Brown,P.E.,Vice President Date For Conservation Commission: Two copies of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; two copies of pages 1 and 2 of the N01 Wetland Fee Transmittal Form; and the city/town fee payment � must be sent to the Conservation Commission by certified mail or hand delivery. For DEP: � One copy of the completed Notice of Intent(Form 3), including supporting plans and documents; one copy of pages 1 and 2 of the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form; and a copy of the state fee payment must be sent to the DEP Regional Office(see Instructions) by certified mail or hand delivery. (E-filers may submit these electronically.) � � wpaform3.doc•rev. 11/30/O6 Page 8 of 9 � � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by DEP�'""" � �;, „�� Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands �.� M {+�� y DEP F�le Number �, r � WPA Form 3 - Notice of Intent � ��` °�A �� 4 �'��y � �`�E��(Document Transaction Number� Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 " saiem �� ;� CitylTown G. Signatures and Submittal Requirements (cont.) � Other: If the applicant has checked the"yes" box in any part of Section D, Item 3, above, refer to that section and the Instructio�s for additional submittal requirements. � The original and copies must be sent simultaneously. Failure by the applicant to send copies in a timely manner may result in dismissal of the Notice of Intent. � ,� � � � � � /� � � � � � wpafortn3.doc•rev. 11/30/06 Page 9 of 9 � � � � � , 1 i 1 � WETLAND FEE TRANSMITTAL FORM , , � 1 � 1 � � � � 1 1 I � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands � NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 � �mPon��t: A. Applicant Information When filling out , forms on the 1. Applicant: computer, use only the tab Harold Newhall South Essex Sewerage District key to move a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company � your cursor- 50 Fort Avenue, PO Box 989 do not use the d.Mailing Address return key. Salem MA 01970 � e.CitylTown f. State g.Zip Code � `� 978-744-4550 h. Phone Number � 2. Property Owner(if different): � a. First Name b. Last Name c.Company 1 d Mailing Address e.Citylfown f.State g.Zip Code ' h. Phone Number 3. Project Location: � Harmony Grove Road Salem a. Street Address b.City/Town JTo calculate g, Fees filing fees, refer � to the category Notice of Intent(Form 3) or Abbreviated Notice of Intent(Form 4): fee list and examples in the The fee should be calculated using the following six-step process and worksheet. Please see instructions for �nstructions before fillin out worksheet. � filling out WPA 9 Form 3(Notice of Intent). Step 11Type of Activity: Describe each type of activity that will occur in wetland resource area and buffer zone. � Step 2/Number of Activities: Identify the number of each type of activity. i � Step 3/lndividual Activity Fee: Identify each activity fee from the six project categories listed in the instructions. Step 4/Subtotal Activity Fee: Multiply the number of activities (identified in Step 2)times the fee per I, � category (identified in Step 3)to reach a subtotal fee amount. Note: If any of these activities are in a Riverfront Area in addition to another Resource Area or the Buffer Zone, the fee per activity should be multiplied by 1.5 and then added to the subtotal amount. III � Step 5/Total Project Fee: Determine the total project fee by adding the subtotal amounts from Step 4. Step 6/Fee Payments: To calculate the state share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and subtract $12.50. To calculate the city/town share of the fee, divide the total fee in half and add $12.50. Wpafortn3 aoc•NOI WeOantl Fee Transminal Fotm•rev.3/'I/OS page 1 0(2 � I ;� Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � � Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 � B. Fees (continued) Step 1lType of Activity Step 2/Number Step Step 4/Subtotal Activity � of Activities 3/lndividual Fee Activity Fee � NA NA $0 $0 I � l � � Step 51Total Project Fee: $0 � Step 6IFee �ayments: � Total Project Fee: $� a.Total fee from Step 5 State share of filing fee: $� b. 1/2 total fee less$12.50 � City(Town share of f Iling fee: $� c. 12 total fee plus$12.50 , C. Submittal Requirements 1 a.) Complete pages 1 and 2 and send with a check or money order for the state share of the fee, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Department of Environmental Protection � Box 4062 Boston, MA 02211 b.) To the Conservation Commission: Send the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated Notice of Intent; 1 a copy of this form; and the city/town fee payment. c.) To DEP Regional Office (see Instructions): Send a copy of the Notice of Intent or Abbreviated I Notice of Intent; a copy of this form; and a copy of the state fee payment (E-filers of Notices of Intent may submit these electronically.) � Wpatorm3.dac•NOI Wetlantl Fee Transmittal Form•rev.3H/OS paee y�q � � � � � � 1 1 1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FORM � � � � , � � � � � � ' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands 1 � Stormwater Management Form � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 , A. Property Information Important: � When filling out 1. The proposed project is: forms on the computer, use a. New development ❑ Yes � No only the tab � key to move b. Redevelopment � Yes ❑ No your cursor- do not use the c. Combination ❑ Yes � No ��f yes, distinguish redevelopment components from return key. new development components on plans). � .�(I,� I I 2. Stormwater runoff to be treated for water quality is based on the following calculations: �I�I , a. ❑ 1 inch of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for discharge to critical areas � (Outstanding Resource Waters, recharge areas of public water supplies, shellfish growing areas, swimming beaches, cold water fisheries). INote: b. ❑ 0.5 inches of runoff x total impervious area of post-development site for other resource areas. This November NA— The proposed project will not result in an increase in impervious area. 2000 version of � the Stormwater Management B. Stormwater Management Standards Form supersedes earlier versions DEP's Stormwater Mana ement Polic March 1997 includes nine standards that are listed on the , including those 9 Y � � contained in following pages. Check the appropriate boxes for each standard and provide documentation and DEP's additional information when applicable. Stormwater � Handbooks. Standard #1: Untreated stormwater a. � The project is designed so that new stormwater point discharges do not discharge untreated stormwater into, or cause erosion to, wetlands and waters. � Standard #2: Post-development peak discharges rates � a. ❑ Not applicable— project site contains waters subject to tidal action. Post-development peak discharge does not exceed pre-development rates on the site at the point of 1 discharge or downgradient property boundary for the 2-yr, 10-yr, and 100-yr, 24-hr storm. b. � Without stormwater controls � c. ❑ With stormwater controls designed for the 2-yr, and 10-yr storm, 24-hr storm. d. ❑ The project as designed will not increase off-site flooding impacts from the 100-yr, 24-hr storm. 1 I ! Wpaform3 tloc•Stormwatar Management Fortn•rev.3I1ro5 Page 7 of 5 � , Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands � ' Stormwater Management Form � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 , B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) , Standard #3: Recharge to groundwater Amount of impervious area (sq. ft.) to be infiltrated: 0 sf a.square feet � Volume to be recharged is based on: t. ❑ The following Natural Resources Conservation Service hydrologic soils groups (e.g. A, B, C, D, or UA) or any combination of groups: 1 1.%of impervious area 2. Hydrologic soil group 3.%of impervious area 4.Hydrologic soil group , 5.%of impervious area 6. Hydrologic soil group 7.%of impervious area 8.Hydrologic soil group � c. ❑ Site specifc pre-development conditions: i, Re�na�e�ace 2.vomme � a. Describe how the calculations were determined: � �I' � e. List each BMP or nonstructural measure used to meet Standard#3 e. . d well infiltration trench . ( 9 rY , ) � � � Does the annual groundwater recharge for the post-development site approximate the annual recharge from existing site conditions? � f. ❑ Yes ❑ No Standard #4: 80%TSS Removal 1 a ❑ The proposed stormwater management system will remove 80% of the post-development site's average annual Total Suspended Solids (TSS) load. t. Identify the BMP's proposed for the project and describe how the 80%TSS removal will be � achieved. Refer to the Project Narrative provided in Appendix A for further details. i Wpafortn3 doc•Stormwater Management Porm•rev.3/1I05 Page 2 of 5 � ', Massachusetts Department of Emironmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands � � Stormwater Management Form � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 ' B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) c. If the project is redevelopment, explain how much TSS will be removed and briefly explain why 80% , removal cannot be achieved. Refer to the Project Narrative provided in Appendix A for further details. , � Standard #5: Higher potential pollutant loads See Stormwater poes the ro ect site contain land uses with hi her otential ollutant loads ' Policy Handbook P 1 9 P P Vol. I, page I-23, for land uses of a. ❑ Yes � No b. If yes, describe land uses: high pollutant Iloading (see Instructions). � c. Identify the BMPs selected to treat stormwater runoff. If infiltration measures are proposed, describe the pretreatment. (Note: If the area of higher potential pollutant loading is upgradient of a critical area, infiltration is not allowed.) , � � ' Standard #6: Protection of critical areas � See Stormwater Will the project discharge to or affect a critical area? Policy Handbook Vol. I, page I -25, a. ❑ Yes � No b. If yes, describe areas: for critical areas � (see Instructions). c. Identify the BMPs selected for stormwater discharges in these areas and describe how BMPs meet restrictions listed on pages I-27 and I-28 of the Stormwater Policy Handbook—Vol. I: � � � � Wpatorm3.0oc•Stormwater Management Form•rev.3H/OS Page 3 MS � � Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands I � � Stormwater Management Form � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 � B. Stormwater Management Standards (cont.) Note: , components of Standard #7: Redevelopment projects redevelopment projects which Is the proposed activity a redevelopment project? plan to develop � previously a. � Yes ❑ No b. If yes, the following stormwater management standards have been met: undeveloped areas do not fall 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8. under the scope � of Standard 7. Refer to the Project Narrative provided in Appendix A for further details. ' c. The following stormwater standards have not been met for the following reasons: 1 4 and 9 Refer to the Project Narrative provided in Appendix A for further details. 1 d. ❑ The proposed project will reduce the annual pollutant load on the site with new or improved stormwater control. , I Standard #8: Erosion/sediment control a. � Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design to prevent erosion, control sediments, and stabilize exposed soils during construction or land disturbance. � , Standard #9: Operation/maintenance plan � a. ❑ An operation and maintenance plan for the post-development stormwater controls have been developed. The plan includes ownership of the stormwater BMPs, parties responsible for operation and maintenance, schedule for inspection and maintenance, routine and long-term maintenance responsibilities, and provision for appropriate access and maintenance easements extending from a � public right-of-way to the stormwater controls. b. Planlfitle c. Date � d. Plan(fitle e. Date � � Wpalorm3.tloc•Smrmwater Management Fortn•rev.3/1/OS Page 4 ot 5 � I , Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands � � Stormwater Management Form � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 , C. Submittal Requirements oniine users: DEP recommends that applicants submit this form, as well as, supporting documentation and plans, � documentU� with the Notice of Intent to provide stormwater management information for Commission review transac�ion consistent with the wetland regulations (310 CMR 10.05 (6)(b)) and DEP's Stormwater Management numter Policy (March 1997). If a particular stormwater management standard cannot be met, information I (provided on should be provided to demonstrate how equivalent water quality and water quantity protection will be your receipt rovided. DEP encoura es en ineers to use this form to certi that the ro ect meets the stormwater page)witn an P 9 9 f1' P J supplementary management standards as well as acceptable engineering standards. For more information, consult information you the Stormwater Management Policy. ' submit to the Department. D. Signatures 1 1 Harold G. Newhall, Executive Director 3-�-�b j Applicant Name Date I ��..� �s. �1?��r�,�p11 Signature , Todd M. Brown, P.E.,Vice President 3 2/ � Representative(if any) Date � ��.� �„E3,� Signature � � i � # 1 , 1 Wpafortn3.tloc•Stormwater Management Form•rev.3/1I05 Page 5 of 5 � APPENDIX A � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' � ' � � � 1 , � , , � , ' ' a v � � m z 0 x a , � , ' SECTION 1 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Tighe&Bond ' This section provides a site description and resource area characterization for the project area. Land use in the general vicinity of the project area was detemrined based , on direct observations made during site inspections and a review of information available through the Massachusetts Geographic Information System (MassGIS). ' 1.1 GENERAL The project will take place at the existing Peabody Metering and Sampling Facility , which is situated between Harmony Grove Road and the North River canal. A Site Locus (Figure 1) and DEP Priority Resource Areas map (Figure 2), which illustrate the � project location and surrounding physical and environmental features, aze provided in Appendix B. As shown on Figure 1, the area azound the subject site consists of residential and commercial properties, and municipal open space (i.e., cemeteries). � 1.2 METHODOLOGY OF RESOURCE AREA INVESTIGATIONS 1 Site investigations were conducted in December 2006. Resource areas were delineated in accordance with Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection guidelines and 310 CMR 10.00. ' 1.3 DESCRIPTIONS OF WPA WETLAND RESOURCE AREAS � The proposed project is located within Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (BLSF) and the 200-foot Riverfront Area of the North River canal, as well as the 100-foot Buffer ' � Zone to inland Bank. The following text describes these jurisdictional areas. BorderinR Land Subject to Floodin� I � According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for Peabody (Community-Panel number 250999 OOO1B; effective date: May 15, 1980) and Salem (Communiry-Panel number 250102A; effective date: March 15, 1977), the limits of ' , 100-year flooding extend northerly from the North River canal to the northerly side of Harmony Grove Road. � Riverfront Area The annual Mean High Water (MHW) line of the North River canal, an easterly � flowing perennial stream, at this location is presumed to be coincident with the top of inland Bank based on (1) observations of the first break in slope, (2) the absence of sediment deposits, and (3) the absence of drift deposits in adjacent vegetation and the � chainlink fence. , Notice of Intent- Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements 1-1 1 � , SECTION'I EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Tighe&Bond ' Buffer Zone Work will occur within the 100-foot BuFfer Zone of inland Bank. Buffer Zone at this , location consists of previously developed, degraded, and/or disturbed areas, including the maintained (i.e., mowed) yard of the Peabody Metering and Sampling Facility. , , 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF SALEM ORDINANCE PROTECTED AREAS The proposed project is located within Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (BLSF) and , the 200-foot Riverfront Area of the North River canal, as well as the 100-foot Buffer Zone to inland Bank. No work will occur within areas subject to local jurisdiction j , beyond the resource areas subject to the WeUands Protection Act which were previously mentioned. I � 'I.5 RARE $PECIES The Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) i , datalayer maintained by MassGIS, updated December 2006, and the NHESP Atlas, 12'" Edition, effective October 1, 2006, were consulted during the preparation of this NOI. The proposed project is not located within an azea identified by NHESP as Priority ' and/or Estimated Habitat. � I 1 1 � � 1 , Notice of Intent- Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements 1-2 � , , SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION T�19f'1@HCB011C� � 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE , The property is owned, operated, and maintained by the South Essex Sewerage District (SESD), a district of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Facility measures and rewrds wastewater flow that is conveyed to it from the City of Peabody sewer system. 1 These data are used to calculate Peabody's share ofthe operation and maintenance costs at the SESD Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) located in Salem, Massachusetts. � The proposed project is intended to address flow monitoring accuracy and sampling concems identified by the SESD at this location. Specifically, grease accumulation at ' this location has been observed and identified as a complicating factor potentially affecting flow meter accuracy and wastewater sampling. Further, the current metering station bypass arrangement does not allow for efficient isolation of the meter for ' general cleaning, maintenance, or emergency repairs. ' 2.2 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES As shown on the Plan provided in Appendix E of this NOI, the proposed activities are limited to previously altered (i.e., developed, degraded, and disturbed) azeas that consist ' of the facility and its regulazly maintained fenced yard. The project will not result in impacts to mature woody vegetation at tlus locaUon. Details of the proposed project are presented in a rough construction sequence, provided below. , l. Install protective measures , Siltation fence will be installed as shown on the Plan provided in Appendix E. The installation will not require the cutting or removal of woody vegetation. Siltation fence alone is presumed adequate to protect wetland resource areas , since We site is relatively topographically level and the proposed activities aze not likely to destabilize a large area. 2. Construct new piping and install new valve and slide gate , An approximately 8-foot wide trench will be excavated to a depth of approximately 15 feet so that approxunately 10 linear feet of 36-inch ductile � iron (DI) pipe can be constructed between Structure M and the Metering Chamber. In addition, an approxnnately 8-foot wide trench will be excavated to a depth of approxunately 15 feet so that a new valve and approximately 4 feet of � new pipe can be installed (total length of approximately 10 feet) on the 36-inch DI pipe northwest of the Metering Chamber. 1 Additional work within the basement of the existing facility will include installation of new pipe. Work in the basement will also include the construction of a new sampling port, the relocation of the magnetic flow meter, � Notice of Intent- Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements 2-1 , � , SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tighe&Bond , and the replacement of an existing 4-inch drain. The basement work will not result in any surface disturbance. A new slide gate will be installed in Structure , M but will not result in any surface disturbance. 3. Restore disturbed surfaces i Disturbed areas will be restored to pre-construction conditions. Unpaved areas will be loamed, if necessary, and seeded with a fast-growing upland seed mix to promote soil stabilization. Paved areas disturbed during construction will be , repaired to match pre-construction conditions. Access to the site will be through the existing gate (shown on the Plan provided in ' Appendix E). Equipment will be staged within paved areas to the extent practicable. Excavated material from trenching activities will be sidecast to the adjacent lawn within the approximate work area limits shown on the drawing. All mechanized work will � occur within the approximate work area limits proposed. � 2.3 SUMMARY OF JURISDICTIONAL WPA ALTERATIONS The proposed project will result in an approximately 3,170 square foot work area (defined by the limits of siltation fence) within the 200-foot Riverfront Area of the , North River canal and BLSF, as well as the 100-foot Buffer Zone of inland Bank. Of this, approxunately 1,200 square feet is located in Salem. However, direct (temporary) , alteration of these areas due to trenching is approximately 160 squaze feet. 2.3.1 WPA Performance Standards Compliance , The proposed project is ]ocated within the 200-foot Riverfront Area of the North River canal. However, per 310 CMR 10.58(6)(h), the proposed activities are exempted from ', , the requirements for Riverfront Area. Work will also occur within BLSF; however, the proposed project will not result in changes to existing site conditions. As such, the proposed project will not result in a loss of flood storage capacity and will not restrict , � flows so as to cause an increase in flood stage or velocity. Further, per 310 CMR 10.57(1)(a)(3), the subject site consists of a portion of BLSF so altered by human activity that its important wildlife habitat functions have effectively been elnninated. II, � As such, the proposed project will not adversely impact wildlife habitat. 'I ' 2.4 DEWATERING Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approxunately four (4) feet below grade at , boring B-1. If necessary, standard dewatering measures will be employed for the trench. No untreated groundwater will be dischazged to wetlands or water bodies. Excess water will be discharged overland in upland azeas and allow to naturally ' Notice of Intent- Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements 2-2 � 1 I , SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION T• he&Bond � , infiltrate in well-drained soils, or discharged to the storm sewer only after passing through infiltration sacks or sunilar devices. , 2.5 PROTECTIVE MEASURES , The following measures will be employed to muumize impacts to resource areas during construction and to provide unprovements to resource azeas within the lunits of the work area once construction is complete. �� , • Wetland resource areas at the site will be protected by siltation fence. The siltation fence will be placed in a fashion that restricts the Contractor to a work ' azea sufficient to conduct the work. The locations of these protective measures are shown on the Project Plans in Appendix E. • Excess excavated ma[erial will be properly disposed outside the limits of � jurisdictional wetland resource areas. , ' ' 1 ' ' � , , � Notice of Intent- Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements 2-3 , ' , SECTION 3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Tighe&Bond , This section summazizes the project design and Best Management Practices in relation to the nine Stormwater Management Standards under DEP's stormwater management ' policy and should be referenced in wnjunction with the Stormwater Management Form ', provided with this NOI. A description of the standards in relation to the project is presented in the following text. ' 3.'I STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS ' Standard 1: The proposed project will not result in any new unueated stormwater point dischazges and will not cause erosion to wetlands and waters. ' Standard 2: Post-development discharge rates will not exceed pre-development dischazge rates without stormwater controls. ' Standard 3: The proposed project will not result in an increase in impervious area. Standard 4: The proposed redevelopment project will not result in any increase in ' impervious area. As such, total suspended solids (TSS) removal is not included in the design. , Standard 5: This project does not contain land uses with higher potential pollutants as described in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy. II , Standard 6: The proposed project will not discharge to or affect a critical area (see Figure 2 - DEP Priority Resources Map in Appendix B). ' Standard 7: The proposed project meets the definition of redevelopment because the ` project will not result in a net increase in unpervious area. A summary of project , compliance with respect to the standazds of the Stormwater Management Policy follows: the project complies with Standazds 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8; the project does not fully comply with Standards 4 and 9. ' Standard S: Erosion and sediment controls are incorporated into the project design (see Section 2.6) and the Site Plan in Appendix E for proposed locations and details of � controls. Standard 9: Stormwater controls are not proposed for this project, therefore an � Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan is not included as part of this narrative. ' J:1S1S1526\PERMITS\SALEM1Project Narretive.doc ' Notice of Intent- Peabody Metering Chamber Improvements 3-1 ' APPENOIX B � � ■■■ � � � � � � � � � �■ � � r s ■� � , ' � ' , , , ' , ' � ' , � a � � m ' _ v X W ' ' ' , ' '� i � � � - � � � . i hyt �n .�, �� '� Y J _� � —�'�`�� .� .//�, e •` i 'yl �..� �l ,�y_��'�...'+, . : J �: �. 2 �n7rEHctiA. i i � �:� c 4... " ` . r�t . � ' s�� r � 2t \'.- � / — 7s ..._a, t L .— � , ot�'�*��.� � f� t ,3��i 1 � M� �. � r . v '� r � � i y nr�i � ��y nr�J . . �t� `Ra�k .. s+sr� >�: ' �+� � nat. �� `��^l..._ . � �� 4 �':% � � �. � ..,'t � ' � �;_ ��R �� `7� ;��i„� ` z.� h .... T, i . , \'.. �. � . a7, r �. . a . � ��t : ,�,� . .' pTe�\i�r °�f,' < �. Ce` � �� G011 Coutse r�1'„Rs \'"�n r f !� � "\� � �t. ! �' _ Od�9 � `. _ Hl�f i`� „A � 2 ! � \ L ;ir�.s� "?PiiM�j�° u ;i � � ' � ` ' � . i � � -: \ �� tfi 7, `� �, �\ ' � vi � ..... � i �, ... � �n. C �� `��l�d f \ �� F 1 �I i � d , 1 � _ �. �� .� . ' -v � 1. f�' d � - Al�� /� � � .l_ �Ga �t�� NT H� i' '� ,u+, la� fi,.:� —� '..1 . � 1 � � �i Cours�� ,. ,� � .'�i--r--- / :,j. �. � � A � � ` f t. �a � 6'� � i ��t� �� .: , 15 � l �}1 1 \`0��" ��` � r . �� \� < � � 1 \� � " , `yf � �.� � T, "`� . 1 n �1 { �� . �� :� �Y �\1� \-�I� � ` � �� ".�� I » 1 � �. 3 � .. T\ <\ �� J �Cq'� '� I � �� FI � � � . � . xV� i� )� � [�� i�� r �1_z l �l � � ` �� . I� � A / ,�. ' � ``` \\, 1�\\; 6 `'� t r;� � �' _ v" � �i \ i �`i.Z'\ y > S -� , � IH 9 Q , v Y� - ". ( + , � 1 �4 �\ ,� I/1 .� t`s �n�„ ��ti"� � �� / �� '�3t > �AO�. ~1. �r. fj'. '4 i� J �a '� �( r y �'r. � ' � 1 ' S`�.� � 4 : f _t r_� 1 1 �'� � J �i f p�`a h ' �� J �� L � � +I f i � �,2 Y i_x � �5.;. � � v � x�: � f � " � �:. � �� 7. ti. n. '.R� �.J _ o e r t r � � + � y �. ' �� 's ' �� 4 e ! . � i' -� 1 �t r� �i: d � � �+ � .�`� � . � � i. � < t� � �l , a l n ,�� i C�� ix o�l \� � � � ,, �.._. � � ��r: � . w � r • i� .� � ` a .� � . ,^, , 2 n z : L i* `E.� _ . \ � h -k'.» L !i .� a ,, t i. J� • � a ., '2 s.` �;SS54" < � i�( i � , .o ozai° � � � A�� "'„ � y '� � °�;I � j� .r� i �. �).i : r� .Y...� ' � kr� J�v �.�' .�1 ,i, r o . �.,�. � I �Yx �. � �` �� Z:L � ..s a.`.. �� O . `/3 <." h� / !f �Y � yh '.:^.'. �F �<,, . .. . 1 � � �Y �m� '� ` ` SITE LOCATION "� ''`; ' .i ;(� �.� ' i i� i .� �?., � .�� ,`" � z�. Y�.�, : 3 c . ��- � i � Nr � y (J� Yr'�.. � c �� 1 ,� i �;y .W_� , ' ' . . ` 4 1.. � y(p � � .: �`� �� i � / .. � � ..tf ! < � I .� � ,� �.f � �� r / `� 4 ,�� , Y m � rre . k l � � � � 5f " I .>,. � d ., � . � 2 f ' i,� • r � �Il� 1 � � � ♦ ��I� ' , � { .�� .� t .. �'� � y �„�, �. �� `' � -� � ' Y. k �� 7r : �� ' . / � . ;. r � 1� �� .. ' �' .�� °� � �1 S� � ` G ' a n >..._,t � f��ll�\ �\ iI �;. �..V, J �a� 1. , r` 1j2� �nN 1 t . y� �� y � Q ..� I14 i . y � tl. '+ ' r .� � �1 r ..a 1^ 'w �C �� t ��t �� y �� , ,�y'. r �r� � \ � - � h� / _� •t . -� \��•,_��, �`�\\1 1 � � ' 6\n t �{I�l ��I q n i ua , •� '� �;�„ � �,,,. V �� . 1 � � "�• � � o<...,n rt r � r 11 �.. � � ti . 1 � i � 1 v � ,,. �Ti k��":��. ,�� , .� ;� ��• l G�. � z�� r4 . �, "� � �' � � - ��• - �� =�.e. �;. � � . r � � �/ "o �i.� � .f�3., �;.:r . °'' n � ` � _yb - --L~ / n � ' t �,'S ., ' � V � � � �.�. � , ir� + . " ' .\ . . ! ..�( a'O I �\ ' kr T ••. ; � ' 7� � ,�'s ' ��1'' p �\ \�,�'�`�`. 4, ��. � ��s' `\�S �`�.� � 1) \t S � ¢ � d � • .: : \o ' , �0. a ��l � �, ' " '" - t _ � y�� :t. %s£ ` �+��.� � � • ,t . �" \ d�i ', ,.�ra' '� \�\�7��,Fw'. ~/�ct y�.�r �Y��.. BASED ON USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FOR FIGURE 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS QUADRANGLE SITE LOCUS ' REVISED 1988 3-METER CONTOUR INTERVAL SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT N PEABODY METERINGAND SAMPLING FACILITY , HARMONY GROVE ROAD u,�E PEABODY&SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Mass. ' s Tighe&Bond � ,:�.M `�-' SCALE 1:25,000 JANUARY 2007 J:\5\51526\gisytlfwsgs.ptlf V\Projacts\S\51526\usgs mxtl ' , '� �- �'-- -y i/. /'�� f r . ` � �/' �'-�� + • \ � yl�i�I'..�� l��J t J �� ` f 1 j � 4 I DANVE t � � r.�...�t ��_ � I-L1` � , � �' ;>:;�: �, _ � � � � � �%� j , / j�: '- � � �., *y.t::,:_.. N , ,� ' F,-v W+r �,�'\� I ��.��:;:: A � '9 ^ V`��q(�- - ir`� , �%"128 m �-r`�� ' `> L�� .�, ,9 � m yo�i v� i �,- �_. l o , � � �� 't ,Q '',._r _ � 35�' � -m ' : � P T f n: ' � L-R A � �a 5� \ F`��:.•j,'.\. O P� pQ.x_RO, i �O O "'\ p :'�-' ', �v ~ �j 2-[� , �-*�� At�lC 't Q N'E'F�S y- ` x� / !4 �,. S;- � l �.\ r�G�� a�' � ,� '" _�'. / • �` M i ' � 8 H N . f —, ��f� �C,.; . t� \'4��S � • ' \ � �,, �G/ .. � �� - � 114 i:a , ��\c�; ' ti �'� � r ` p Y ��. _ � r H3lR ��,�� U 1 ` j'�. ' i 1. �F R J- t' , r `'�o x�,�c �� —k. ` ./��.� �� ! d.(V � 'i` , , Q-Y�hQ� � t . \ �: � � !�'. RP U If ; R T,.,�A�� F,Qi�; ,�; `�'�? � 1 FT ' � '-�'f� r-�.�ti •y, �6� . \r <O f A_ ' I . 'jr`` � �. \ 1 � � � J�. >/ .c, � ' ��"-� �. � �t 1' + S EE�� ,�S )� � .l � ,x C�i � R�� r ��4,� ;, S`j 1�� • \ , �'^}' , ..,p e�s, A ''� f� �. ��f i � �� STR �c�` � 6 �; � ...., r � ' � , ' ..��- .__,�. ,�� . � -- - „ �.yu --�i �.. ,�tl�� ./- '� � �G�,:,�, •. " . �--� ' ,. t + ` �,.-�' :�i°c � J �pun � } ��9�.+� i g �'. r� F r -y'a . F�y,�'�� 1 'ti i�, �,��°"� `� � II ;�� 7 ��T� F SITE LOCATION ' � ' -' - � -` � �� 1 ry �� ,._ r �r��A� ..\ FET �. � ` . ' y� �\ ` .n � �� /t�� ' � . � '( -��- � '�i ' 1 '" � 9' � �` ,� "ph s"' a'-} � � �Q�G � � � Y�� L � � � .� , f,� ,�� r � � 'a ' ' �, � � � � —t� ��;��„��' �� c a �� +II _, ti � �u ' ` ,nn,uto�,ti� `� r�{�f � l y f <�.: C • � � �� t � a ,•�,,c6. : �/ �8y�7 .��, t��:: A1��r�,��' � ! 1 _�\ �x� � i , ' L�<�1C�P � N �t. �► II I I I 1��T 1 .. 2 —1 (� �. �. � � � O �'' C.�r 2 A-TE �� t t �i , ��, `� ti �. 'g O , �;,t+�� `� '�. l�`�\` �. " .:- � N „a T � �Y Y � '1 `•, `4 p z L� �o� .� w °I ,- . � W � _ \ w. ,- , q � �. —,.� �� — '� 4 '� �3 ,�� ar� e� ',: �� ,k � � � P � � �.�� ..S,}+ � � � .1' � \rP'�� \�\�` � _ �. / " ryt\ � *_�:�„ \GZ. \ ` '� \ , l� � Yr ( �., ; -� MassGIS DATAVALIDAS OF NOVEMBER 2006. � Y ' � NNESGCeNfiedltirolPook � IbnFobMalDnnkiryVAle�SourtePiae'.AletliunYetl n�,, e �mm��„k��,�.00„.s��..�., � �.>e„�:�om.w�,.,��,m�..�s�..e FIGURE 2 0 CommurvlyFubkVhhrSupply�G�euMrYe� � PokruiaMy>roEi[1tueAkOium eplqukr ♦ �°�°°^m°"^�°RT�°^°�^"'s � `°"""'"`"°'""°"°�""""°"" DEP PRIORITY RESOURCE AREAS ' 0 rw.comm�nn.,.��.Maws � aw�s�a...va.,swrhivsws� � �m�mea.��wen.n � Evnc..�a�wmsm�so�ab�n.� � wn.�.�.ihro,.v.uorumn.e�.., oerPov,�,eewu.�.av,neme.a.,lv�,.z� � ou.�r+�.�,e.�.ewv N oEP��•�m��M•a=�=�•n��M•��Ta — '""°"'°� °°M°`", SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT PWibu�x.eVble�SupplyPro�e[IbnA�ea�ZorclV — MImS�rcelorPOM o ,,,.Peb s„.BTO1e„„,,,,,,�,,.,Fw�,. - .��,o,ra� PEABODY METERINGAND SAMPLING FACILITY , � a.��-�y��k,�•��=�F••�= _ 'e„„�a°';�, W F HARMONY GROVE ROAD " `"'"""""°"`°"�e°"`°'" ""� PEABODY&SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS � r,.., 0 s.��.b,�,�.ro � S. \\\\ uxEsvv,a,Mx.n�m,v,,,s�.. o v�v.n�,R �/// ueesveni�i.ewe�nuro�e.r.wiaort 0 °"p°o , �� M ' o,o�,.d.bAE,Heo�oa�=o,� �,.a�� Tighe&Bond � � smore��+a.e..�� a=mo�c-mmaiE.r.,o�m.neica��minc[cl O �scsaefaroKeou�e..y sanw.v.�roni SCALE 125,000 JANUARY 2007 J:\S1S15261gisytlflgis.pM V:\Projects\S1S1526\gis.mvtl ' APPENDIX C � � ! � i � ! � � � � � � � � � � � � r � t � � � � � , � ' a v �o m ' s 0 ic e� , r � � � � � � . � � . .... . . . . . .... . „3�� . i��''+�` `�,� � � !��`��,� �,�,��i(� ' g' � � , . ,.Q lr • a'�r�2.'�l�lta�`�+,1[� 3 +:��. -L�� .^—r '. IN�I � i�l i�cTf�ti'ILt `dikF�rOY�I I � . . �• �`. : I � i .e i�,. . � �� swl{aw�...n� . i .w�a��(( C it - xlci "F�� I. �" . muRlai►!&� 1.' ' .. 47'��'-T='.�LII�T'ew' _._ —_ H �..J I _ • I I f *. � • � • .��• � . � � • � � �• � � � ��.• ��r � , - � '�j; . �.;�l� iii r v`�'►y " 4 . , �� , � � � l' �n d,H, Y " �i� �� v fi;�� I y i, ; � i�it�,i r a .i, j �� t��r � �y� A � d � � ^ . � - . ��.lr I:fit11�J � �r ��:`� . I — �. ' 'Q,� . i:;�ill ��' ti� �i�� '�1 � �„'��r� "'''„ • ��¢Irskay��i .. . F.� :. _..ii'r � ac 1s�" �' �i r t �y._. . - . .�iVi�s ,.I � , 6- �� ;n, ;Illi : yl � y�y�'�` • ' ��i�'1 ��'T�Y is4�: � ,�� .\ , ,��ri�. f . � . --e 'rs�'y '4 �-. ��.aM� . , . . �^'�.P" . . . � . "- � r, `� ,w,aF�� : ,.,�.r "....,,,�..#/�1 � . �,;+ " . r.. ` �i,��" ..�uw��yr' �*:.r^'�:�� :..r . ,'•r. 'r `� �r.r+�Aw'k�'�"`� ' -. . .�.'. 3 ��V;' ,� ,.Qyo;.�4".".Y "b*� y,p� '�A� "+`- � ��.� ';��4. �5., -+ � .a '. tr y �,�,,,, .._ 43. A`, � V,�III��` ~ ��,�': 4 �' f� x '�y - , A},l ' P g �. ..j' �1N:§Y a.( ,,,# � . � . . . ��(�� . :�. ` # , �.', I � r �,...� ��`�' .�"'�t',YJW�n ..� . . . �'1 ✓ .. , dir � Yc _s,,. �'4Z aN' i �.,. • • � � • � � • � •� �. • . � � � r '�.� . � � . -.... . . . . . _... . - ;:� . bc'^ s�aP; ;;;��j,p 9 �'�;��'�i t � ��, I,` l- � �l i � �1��1 �1� ' Q � I``,,1 � N�� 11. � ��1111 C' � J O�Ipll � � � n a � �111 A o 1) � ` L �'1 A' �, �M� I `� ' f � 11��' ,,��''d�,r 3�17' — �� } � � � E � � ••, � � r � �-''- _ „�,""� � �i . �e � '.;� l+.'k� .�- ,.ti'' '� ^ , f -� �•';�w+� � r.�,�i--�... �''4�1� � on;� ��:�_ � �, `... ,n�, _.�.— � �_ . . �. . f. �.., # � ��Y ''' �° s_ „ �� f ri i4i ��—,�r+ltl� i �i Y r . Ir'"IIM� y .. ! , w� �� I �� IP � � + ...� � *w �Y� �Yt.., r ..♦� . .b^dry . .i 4 %� ' � ~ �� , � . ,.: "C.#, .; " �J"��MiPpK+ -sY, J : t" � � � �' �1 I A ! .., , �-`� :;.�� ,��y�'�,l�llll, > y , x �dai� z.i, u - =.__.��;� I "' i 3 �� . . . . � � .�. -. . � . � � . . � �• � -� � -. . � - ...• •. . . . .�� . . c . � �•- � .. . � ` � .-�. �`��,�5' ,:�a .::. , � � . �• � � . . _;m� �'::- 1� � � g �Y,'P'C+�'.S' � . 3? tsK �d?o.t,�+G�a�u'1 rs�" f h�d • " ��Fl� �a �y , �I��}.�lA�{6�V �°': g�� p P� ., .!L1 �} � � S�y�d�� i/ y. A� ; �.!/A.��\`4V}t . �.��. � j3"�. c< , �-' �'4y'�� .. , � �, „�` �` .'a'�,5`' : � �,��y'`��w��,t��E. �a�� __ .,�+ -'^ � ',srv� < <s � � ` �°`a5� � � .�%S @ .:' w'`�.� ' .1.5:\ �f5¢�r��J�:.n �>> .�� ! �IF^�� `� i:� . I _ _ „_:; i �; . > ; , � ; � � � ` - � I B' , � I � � A� �, 4} � '—_i � "'�.� �L� i �.r F•�«�5 �^"' ta��n �.�rr. �� .^Y � ' --- �� { _ rr. � „"'i5,.-�""�.9E',,,E��' ��"'�� !� ��.��" „�' 3 ! :.�, ��. - a� � le�� - `��rc ,�'�'.�y i 1 ` ; ...Ys.."�` �£ : � �.^ � ��'-�A,�� _ _��:'' g9 "'i'^'y��i'� - �",�r4 rte . � .-e'a �'ri.y. u�"' �'�" - � • - . . . . � ��. -. � -. . -. . -. . . - . . - .... . . . . . _... . ��`�'` � � ' ,��► '� �.. Q4,,�.� ,,Pr� ,� �p� . �� Yy%�"��'��'Y�r�e�� F��'�'� �;— ° � �� r � � � � � �' .�.�'�x��''�LA j�.�p��w� �� ( ��;.�~j'T��.k"<r/ �.� '4�� ' � ��'4"! 7�,e�/�y'p1�J9�c, ..e;�� 1'i�; �c+ ��. e��{M'E��l�'. �� :a� ". �� ` r �'��' �y�.�y.'� r �,`y Ru�. �� 4 f�Mp�y,�^.' ( �'� 8 _ .� �I �Yb�S�'�_r; � J1YG(�. P4k R " � J �1�� t ~ 'Y � �L�wdw. 0•t'I ' y i5,d4��'H�I i � � +��' tJ"��p rk�' y� ,� iEi U1') !aj��*�i��i��'P~� '`7t I.i ..� •,•$r�ig.c w"oq¢�-e�' �+�i+3�,�(< •,+ r� 3 ��[ ��t�,�xbSrT.e� v� F' `! ' �� i�� "'� }�; � � n�,= 1R � o � � �� .t � V) � rN �-F" t y' C4 « � u.3 r �f°y';�'e"6�..-.Q�.q�^s f '�� -g..a.`� <�.�r:� }��J , � >�,��.� � , �, �",t� 'uy �6 • 1 �'��, �. � i ca wia„kAi I / � . I ; �x .!��:'�.� ' y . � � ,. v„ � �y. �'S'B�. �t +.r . �.' ==":aLs a�••a'e,.-�1 s sv o . ,� sy. . � � � . - ._.._�.r � �� li'i.wY�C� ,�,��r�s'"�',�„S.i ,� �.'+ � �?r.B/. � � � � i�� F�� 4 .f .�� ! r� M 1. Y 1 �� t \1 � �„ P'��..,�� ,1�� '( .'�' f � ' ty��l�-qyy t . 4 . .�� Ir �,��'. i��" •4�y', I y . �1 � � � �.�{ ��' ��1�1I� ,r�. �hr�f '� . � . . M� '. wy' ' )�''lR��d? �� p ,�lY�� '��N `I /� - II ( I�� 1 �ti f=� J �r� ..yl r � . �� r I�S r. � Y��✓�b d �� i� �r.r.,.^„'� �'`> fi�` Z�� . .t� �1r ' � �i3h ;` ��';� � � � Y , '� ,��+4 � ^ '� '�.,r+f"' ' .r , ' � �' �a4 � ,n `.!�" } �_.,�., -.�r I ^! � `�y j � �"� d � �F�a+.�e � e,..� � r ��`� `..b w es' ., 't��" � � .t o.v�'"V .^ 3L as '^f�,. � �). F ' � ,�"*<'-,e�.. � � ..�. "� w . . • c ,�'�''n_�;" � �:i�� tyd'c,_�_"' ��.,_._ -�� y'< <, � �.r.K — • � ' . • • • • ' �• � • • . � � '�.� � • � �" � � � • w�•'" �'�^`�j�,��'ln.� iT'�� Y p�,7a' '��.7 1Y g '�' �ir� � k.�' cay /�tY �`I)Jl��i\A�. �Jjp .i `+.�'� 9�y�> �& � 1�r^� 1 siir`..-,,,,,_ �! �f9 r� i {'s'�,qy �` '�"" �� ,y - 4 � 'r,� �-�� _'i$,S"��Yr� �r PM A�1 ��w�yy��, t'I� w�,__ � 4 �� ' : ..��q��4f.£'��r �� `"�'� � ''�` t�fA�:r /o��x��"` �� i1'` �`��3��„��"�P�! �� .�� 4 `�4� a�Y'r,,� � ?� �. V� aC.'��so i'�.'q�.�,�° ," 'y�� `, `��sstiv��r;��s�; iY � . �• �� k��'I�{J�`��t.",�°':'8�� l�i`�i��1��'�F�-+{�9`.r r I .q :.,..,A..._. ,`�'""'�i�w��1 ._y.r�., ...a��l'1��'`�.v�''.7..��1�3��4'��"S�.SI` /��'3j1'1,� i��.i:.E r �+� {�`��''I I ll�1�14lWI1�� .1/�}�/�ar' y*'a'•'b�" ° i�.�ts#FI��Jt % �t��q,k. E �vy�,, , ��Ikt", �TM�SkR��!� JS �� TY � K�Wv'i�yi� . �. - ` e } � .� A' x\��^ +��y / I �v. ^ � � y�< f ' � 1�1.w �� .. `�' M ^y, .(. \ j� � �A � ! � P�'�S `� f1 /' + .L ' ��I�s�` �t{�� i � � �. �..�. � ` �M 1� �, �f w ��V A � � �t y��I A�� 1.� � r � i l(i • � t �/' . i�/! � FZ� � h � �`t a. ��f�� r`��9 � �F ,I � f ' �� i. F �` �! ��,��'�� 1 i. .� �� • � � � '1 •� • � " � �� "• 1 � � � � .�� . I I � • • � �• � • � � � APPENDIX D � �■ � � � w � � � a� � � u� �■ � � � � r � � ' , r � t ' a v � m z 0 ie , v � , , � , � , 1 � ' , � NOTIFICATION TO ABUTTERS i Under[he Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and ' the Ciry of Salem's Local Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands In accordance with the second paragraph of Massachusetts General Laws C}tapter 131,Section 40,and the City ' of Salem's Local Salem Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands,you aze hereby notified of the following: li I I. The name of[he applicant is the South Essex Sewerage District(SESD). 2. The applicant has filed a Norice of Inten[with the Conservation Commission for the municipaliry of � Yhe Ciry of Salem seeldng pemussion to remove,fill, dredge or alter an Area Snbject to Piotection or � within ]00 feet of an azea Subjec[to Protection, Under the Wetlands Protecrion Act(General Laws Chapter 131, Section 40) and the Ciry of Salem's Local Salem Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands. , 3. The address of the lo[ where the activity is proposed is 7 Harmony Grove Road (Salem Assessor's Map 16, Pazcel 240). The applicant is seeking approval to make improvements to the e�cisting Peabody Metering and Sampling Facility. ' 4. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be examined only in the Department of Plazming and Community Development Office, 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor,between the houts of 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 a.m. 1 on the following days of the week Monday and Wednesday; between 8:00 A.rot and 7:00 P.M on Thursday;and between 8:00 n.M.and 12:00 r.M.on Friday(with the exception of lunch). For more information on the filing or proposed work,ca1L• (413)572-3224. , Check One: This is the applicant❑,reoresentative �,or other ❑ (specify): � 5. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be obtained from either (check one) the applicant ❑, or the applicant's representative ❑X ,by calling this telephone number: (413)572-3224 between the hours of 8:00 n.M.and 5:00 P.tN.on the following days of the week: Monday through Friday. , F. Infoimation regazding the date,time and place of the public hearing may be obtained from the Salem Conservarion Commission Office,by calling the£ollowing telephone number:(978)745-9595 x5685. ' • NOTE: Notice of the public hearing including the date, time and place, will be published in , the local paper(i.e.,Salem News)at least five(5)days in advance of the hearing. Notice of the public meeting, listing all hearings, including the date,time and place, will be posted in the City Hall by the City Clerk's Office not less than forty�ight (48) hours in , advance of the meeting date. * You also may contact the Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional O�ce for more information about this application or the Wetlands Protection Act at: (978) , 694-3200. � � , � � � � � � �s ��■■i � � � a� �.r � a � � � � List of Abutters to SESD Facility SESD Metering Facility, Peabody and Salem, Massachusetts Map/Lot Property Owner Address City/State/Zip Code City of Peabody Note:Referto attached Certification ofAbutters dated 12-19-06. ' 86-135A South Essex Sewerage District(SESD) 50 Fort Ave. Salem, MA 01970 86-129 City of Peabody 24 Lowell St. Peabody, MA 01960 86-130X Peabody RA, LLC 1385 Hancock St. Quincy, MA 02169 c/o Stop& Shop Tax Dept. 86-135 Augustine J. Merlina, Trustee 27 Howley St. Peabody, MA 01960 A&A Howley Street Trust 86-136 Patricia Flomp, Trustee 50 Broad St. Salem, MA 01970 26 Howley Street Trust 86-162 The Azorean Brotherhood of the Divine Holy Ghost, Inc. 11 Hingston St. Peabody, MA 01960 Go Mario Pinto 96-010 City of Peabody 24 Lowell St. Peabody, MA 01960 126-001 B&M Railroad (MBTA) Iron Horse Park No. Billerica, MA 01862 Guilford Transportation Ind., Inc. -- Salem City Hall 93 Washington St. Salem, MA 01970 Planning Board City of Salem � Note:Refer to attached Salem Abutters List dated 01-04-07. 16-240 South Essex Sewerage District(SESD) 50 Fort Ave. Salem, MA 01970 16-241 Augustine J. Merlina, Trustee 78 East Mountain Revere, MA 02151 A&A Howley Street Trust Ave. 16-242 Harmony Grove Corp. 30 Grove St. Salem, MA 01970 Margi K. Lavender,Admin. 16374" Peabody RA/Stop& Shop 1385 Hancock St. Quincy, MA 02169 Attn: Paula Lowerton Re:Tax Dept. 16376" Paul R. Flores 2 Silver St. Salem, MA 01970 Note:An asterisk(') indicates the parcels listed are abutters according to definition provided in Chapter 32 of the Code of the City of Peabody. As such, the property owner information is not included in the Salem Abutters List. - iziciicouo ua:a� rne a�oaooaaoa �� CERTIFICATION OF ABUTTERS DATF.: IO' -I�- Q(q II , PROPERTY O�NIER: �(J CS��'� �,(f�ElF'f}Q/'�/St MAP: �. CUT: �,j� -��. , PROPERI'YLOC.'ATiGN: _... .. a �J�I/�/l(� ST..__�VA�E/1,�///t'�- _ FLQUESTbD I�1': �J� �. /S. .�RGp!/ Pt1UN� �i: �,,;��=—�aa[� � ' �' i �� PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS FOR THE COMPLETION OF YOUR REOUEST , _ Chapter 138,Scction ]:.�-direct abutters&churches,synagogues,hospitals and schools�vic6in 500' _ Chapter 40A,Secpon 11 •abutter to abuIIer within 300' 1 Special PcmvT _ Variance I Chapter 41, Section S 1T-dirnct abutters 1 ✓ Chapter 32,Ciry of Peabody Code—Weflands g Rlvets Protection Regulatioas abuaer to abutter within 300' , Chapter 131, Section 40-abutters within ]00' (MUST BE DONE AS ABOVE L.FFECTIVE 4/O]) MAP/LOT 1 -- l � ." �,3 S -- ✓ .. - � ��a 9 � � � /�o k.. _ ✓ ��5 � _.. .. , /� G� ✓ /�� _. .._ ' __ ��- �d � ------... _._. .— �.._r r n � II , _ �'l�q� l�l�s . ,ti� r„�_ Sr, J�cE�tiM�- oi9�o - �--� -- . 1 —��-�_�--�/ _ . . .. ..--�-- -� - .—.. .. __.. .. --- ------ �r '.�� 1 -, '� � ..: .----�-- .. :: :� .,:, � ��y,. , .�-;; ' : � � ROARllOFASSES$URS ;1"�;:',s?6'�'%.t';'�%�S%"��j��±r� O , CiTl OI PL•nBODY Gr ��::�� ` � ,. . _ a iq�7 -� ceK-rir•iED � , � - � w � � � � � � u■� � a� w � w� � � � � � �., � N � MAP �NAME NAME2 ADDRESS �CITY STATE ZIP � 066-735A,SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DISTRICT PUMP STATION 50 FORTAVE SALEM MA 01970 0� 086-129 CITY OF PEABODY HARMONY GROVE CEMETERY 24 LOWELL ST PEABOODY � �_01960 �; 086-130X ;PEABODY RA LLC �CIO STOP &SHOPffAX DEPT '1385 HANCOCK ST �QUINCY MA 02169 ,� 086=135 MERLINA AUGUSTINE J TRUSTEE :A 8 A HOWLEY STREET TRUST 27 HOWL Y ST �PEABODY MA_ 01960 � 086 536 .FLOMP PATRICIA TRUSTEE �26 HOWLEY STREET TRUST 50 BROAD STREET SALEM MA 01970 y 086-162 �THE AZOREAN BROTHERHOOD OF THE ,DIVINE HOLY GHOST INC C/O PINTO MAR10 i11 HINGSTON ST PEABODY �MA 01960 � 096-010 CITY OF PEABODY �OLD SOUTH-TRASK CEMETERY 24 LOWELL ST PEABODY MA 07960 N 126-001 �8 & M RAILROAD (MBTA) . GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION IND INC IRON HORSE PARK NO BILLERIC�A MA 01862 � SALEM CITY HALL PLANNING BOARO `93 WASHINGTON ST SALEM 'MA 01970 ;,,,�.)%��,,,v �.,,��:.�::%_ �•� � � i�r�. � ,�(„ . c_' ,.:;.��`- f,/;:c,�'ly(;r�...;.:��"`L � . '�' ��/ _n,� I ��d.��.�j,�L(.�i,'o 1 Y`� p-�V� !�, (-I � 0 0 ro � � � a � � � � � � � r � � /��' �� Patriot Properties Salem �„�4,2�0� . Abutters List 7:50:03AM � r Used: DataPro erty.ParceIID='16-0240-0' OR DataProperty.ParceIID='16-0242-0' OR DataProperty.ParcellD='1G0242-1'OR DataProperty.ParcellD= - Filte a '16-0241-0' B , �:�t#A .:., �� , � � _ :� y ; � �� F R ia � ` w i + �''r c� .�S#Y'� tlt� b�1� i x N�+ � R �� , s L� � fi p,, ,�,�c .kt 2 �� , �;`�x � !. �' f '�'�..a��^ '� e�i-"s"! � �Ear. t� '�,�-•3 ` 2 t > yY""" e�� l rt;=t��' 4 ..3,�G�� [�: �,.i e a;�:.: s k�; �S'$,r a "� � �F':ac ' ' ..:.t% s'k x�� r":,!`E r.rt" w � � '"� ��F'�..�fr�'�i ed:��r,�h��FL?'.c4u x��9 140��If�,_�x � QI�Q4�2�0 2., � .� PS, �x �'( ' 6 W*'s z � Y"S , '�Y � � � � Salem�' k:= E� J .:. F" e..",�"4x h"h V".�, 3 en w °e ^ AEn 5 �rt i ' ,, �� w;�„.��,, � +� ,3,`s�`'�.,,,;aj,,� r" '�� ,��"�e �F r: �q '�`r:"'� � ,��, ?,,».aaz �,.ui ,�pa T ,.��"s , ..,�.��.��s.� x r �R �i �� . '� Y¢�m°� �"�.�a�z��'°�c�'��4�a A� �s�9.#ci " ��'' �� w � � � ,�". 'a ��'t, � } . 5 s a � � � ' � �, ° �� +°.s �'^ .3. '�Sr �*;. ":k�„&�' sx'_ ° �'�} � �"�r �d�. r 9 s` ,'d s. i w�' „� +. s �.k� w. �-�,a.�, � r x .� ��,,.:.,. # } k � �� ¢ � * _ � k" s ^ ",t •,� �,„ n x � � �.;: P 5 � �.F. .$', a}.t s Mc ��` ��.. � 4 A$"y t.;,h 5.`F z�[+!M .OaTM� (�t'✓&�s!�'�"d:;�,„ r . .. : *�-�r.�"'��"''� re�.P � ,"d- � �,1 , N i �,. M 5 a 3 � v ParcellD Location Owner Co-Owner Mailinst Address Citv State Zip��r� 1&0240-0 7 HARMONY GROVE ROAD SOUTH ESSEX SEWERAGE DIST GRIT&GREASE CHAMBER 50 FORT AVE SALEM MA 01970 'I6-0241-0 HARMONY GROVE ROAD A R A HOWLEY STREET TRUST MERLINA AUGUSTINE J TR 78 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE REVERE MA 02151 1E0242-0 30 36 GROVE STREET HARMONY GROVE CORPORATIO� LAVENDER MARGIE K ADM 30 GROVE STREET SALEM MA 01970 16-0242-1 30 GROVE STREET HARMONY GROVE CORPORATIO� LAVENDER MARGIE K ADM 30 GROVE STREET SALEM MA 01970 End of R�port , , NOTIFICATION TO MUNICIPAL BOARDS Under the Ciry of Salem's Local Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands ' In accordance with Secrion 2 of the City of Salem's Local Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands,you aze hereby nodfied of the following: , A. The name of the applicant is the South Essex Sewerage District(SESD). ' B. The applicant has filed a Notice of Intent with the Conservalion Commission for the City of Salem seeking pemussion to remove,fill,dredge or alter an Area Subject to Protection or within 100 feet of an area Subject to Protection, under the City of Salem's Local Ordinance Pertaining to General Wetlands. , C. The address of the lot where the activity is proposed is 7 Harmony Grove Road (Salem Assessor's Map 16, Pazcel 240). The applicant is seeking approval to make improvements to [he existing , Peabody Metering and Sampling Facilily. D. Copies of the Norice of Intent may be examined only in the Deparhnent of Plazuiing and Co�nunity ' Development Office, 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor,between the hours of 8:00 n.M. and 4:00 P.n4. on the following days of the week: Monday and Wednesday; between 8:00 n.mt. and 7:00 P.nn. on Thutsday;and between 8:00 a.n4.and 12:00 P.M.on Friday(with the exception of lunch). ' For more information on the filing or proposed work,call: (413)572-3224. Check One: This is the applicant❑,renresentaNve ❑x ,or other ❑ (specify): wE. Copies of the Notice of Intent may be obtained from either (check one) the applicant ❑, or the applicant's representative 0,by calling this telephone number. (413)572-3224 between[he hours ' of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.on the following days of the week: Monday tluough Friday. F. Information regarding the date,time and place of the public hearing may be obtained from the Salem , Conservation Commission Office,by calling ffie following telephone number:(978)745-9595 x5685. * NOTE: Notice of the public hearing including the date, time and place, will be published in ' the local paper(i.e.,Salem News)at least five(5)days in advance of the hearing. Notice of the public meeting, listing all hearings, including the date, time and place,will be posted in the City Hall by the City Clerk's O�ce not less than forty-eight (48) hours in ' advance of the meeting date. , ' You also may contact the Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office for more information about this application or the Wetlands Protection Act at: (978) ' 6943200. , , 1 I ' , NOTICE OF INTENT MUNICIPAL BOARD NOTIFICATION DISTRIBUTION LIST Application to the City of Salem Conservation Commission ' Recipient Number of Copies Salem City Council 1 ' 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 , Mr. Bruce D. Thibodeau, P.E. 1 Salem City Engineer 120 Washington Street,4`h Floor Salem, MA 01970 ' Mr. Dan Merhalski 1 , Salem Planning Board 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, MA 01970 i ' ' TOTAL 3 , , ' , ' , � ' � 1 , , APPENDIX E � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , , , ' ' a v � z v ' � T ' , ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' 1 ' 1 il _ _ _ � � I I il I � ' ■ � � T� he&Bond �, o ; � � � � N I ' � I � � O �r C i � � � O � � � (C Z 3 � � 6 � I il � M � Q- lQ i i a y I � Q I � --- � - , ��- —, - -- , , '' - � T _ r � -, — —� � -, -�� -- - - - r -- , -� r-� . , _ , i ; r-- � .- ,. � � —, , . I , � . _ � �..—.� 1. _ 1 �• __ •. � •_ __ .__. � �, i �'. � a. ._ _ ... . a '.__ 1 . . .. :,. � _d _. , i _ � +�,_. . .._--+