Loading...
4A BUFFUM STREET - BUILDING JACKET 4A BUFFUM,^STREET ,CMLITtI 4 (gitu of P*XC� 1J3 APPZA j A.4r . : cu III - ClTY SALEH. MASS, JANUARY 16, 1980 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MR. AND MRS.,MICHAEL BICK FOR A SPECIAL PEa1IT FOR 4A BUFFUM STREET EXTENSION A hearing on this Petition was held on January 16, 1980 with the following Board Members present: Acting Chairman, Mr. Hopper, Messrs. LaBrecque, Feeherry and Associate Members Lusinski and Piemonte. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and a notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News on January 2, 1980 and January 9, 1980 in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioners have requested a Special Permit to extend the existing non-conforming use of the structure at 4A Buffum Street Ext. by the addition of a third floor apartment. The property is within an Industrial district; however, the property, like others in the neighborhood, has for many years been used as a residence. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeals may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for altera- tions and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood, nor shall this paragraph apply to billboards, signs, or other advertising devices. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit Will not injure the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board, after considering the evidence at the hearing on this matter, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioners purchased this property recently at a time when it was in need of major repairs. 2. The. petitioners have made a substantial investment in the property. 3. The neighborhood surrounding this property has a number of residences despite the fact that the area is zoned Industrial 4. , The off-street parking: at the property in question is adequate for. , the proposed use. �zivarU of �ypral Jo e �Lrq�E� GTY rtCE SALEM, MASS. PAGE TWO - DECISION - MR. AND MRS. MICHAEL BICK, 4A BUFFUM STREET EXTENSION On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals finds (i) that the proposed use of the property will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing use to the neighborhood, (ii) that the proposed use of the property will not adversely affect the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City's inhabitants, and (iii) that the proposed use of the property is generally in harmony with the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board approves the granting of a Special Permit to the Petitioners. Messrs, Hopper, Feeherry, Piemonte and Lusinski voted in favor of the Special Permit. Mr. LaBrecque opposed the grant of the Special Permit. The Special Permit is therefore granted in accordance with the following terms and conditions: 1. The property may hereafter be used as a three family dwelling. 2. All work must be in accordance with the plans submitted to the Board. 3. The paved parking area which exists at the property and provides at least four parking spaces must be maintained as off-street parking. GRANTED - WITH CONDITIONS Anthony M. geeherry ;i z Acting Secretary APPEAL F.LI THIS DECISION, IF A :7, SH/IL BE C?ADE PURSUAW TO SECT= 17 OF THE roASS. GEf;ER.'! LAtYS, Ciinl'CEi 8C3. P.i;O S LL 6E PIL'O Rf 1.`R; 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING, U;N!v:': IN T:iEi•FE:^.E OF 7 17 CITY Ci-FSS:. - r -33 .._.,. .1. �:.. .r.C_ On 'PECIAL ^:RS,iT - Cii - r < ,.r.v . . .. �F.L h 4i' i' _Ji . - : __., r: E? C.^. . .-_✓ ?"C: 1'L iii 1'rl ESS IS BOARD OF APPEAL A.COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE ,PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.-