Loading...
21 ECE RE EDI TI sN TECHN GIES LI c ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & REMEDIATION SERVICES. 355 Central Street a Rowley, Massachusetts 01969 (978) 948-3861 Mr. Richard Julian c/o Elizabeth Realty Trust 102 Jackson Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 July 19, 2011 RE: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REPORT ELIZABETH Realty Trust Property, f021ackson;Str-eet Salem, Massachusetts 01969 Dear Mr. Julian: Subsurface Remediation Technologies, Inc. (SRT) has completed an assessment of the environmental conditions in the soil at the location and beneath the former 500-gallon capacity No. 2 Fuel Oil Underground Storage Tank (UST) at the above -referenced property. This assessment was in response to your concerns regarding the documentation of its removal. SRT observed conditions and performed sampling at the UST during its removal by H & S Tank Cleaning of Peabody, Massachusetts on June 13, 2011. This tank was cleaned prior to its removal because it had approximately 35 gallons of oil residuals. This was disposed of at a licensed facility; United Oil Recovery, Inc. in Newington, NH. The UST was properly disposed of at Wilford Alloy, Inc., a metal scrap yard, in Lawrence, Massachusetts by H & S Tank Cleaning. Disposal Documents are included in Attachment 1.All assessment actions have been completed in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) 310 CMR 40.0000. The UST location is shown on the Sketch Map attached as Figure 1. Upon the UST removal, the Salem Fire Department (Lt. Griffin) and SRT observed no obvious indications of a release and the UST was in good condition. Photos of the UST removal are included in Attachment 2. To identify possible contaminated soil, SRT conducted field screening of sod samples using an HNU PI-101 photoionization detector for Total Volatile Organic Vapors. The screening procedure used is widely accepted and used to determine the soil Jar Headspace reading 72 hour MCP notification threshold at UST sites which is 100 ppm (parts per million). SRT sampled soils from the excavation bottom at approximately 5-6 feet. Samples indicated vapor concentrations less than 1 ppm (the Hnu readings ranged from 0 to 0.5 ppm on 3 samples). Therefore, NO 72 hour notification was required to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). At the completion of soil Jar Headspace sampling & screening activities, a confirmation sample was obtained for laboratory analysis for Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon (EPH) analysis. The sample location is shown on Figure 1. The sample was then sent to AMRO Environmental Laboratories in Merrimack, New Hampshire, a Massachusetts certified laboratory, for analysis. The sample was analyzed for EPH. The confirmation samples indicated no carbon range EPH or their target analytes were above the most strict reportable or MCP Method 1 risk based standards(See AMRO Laboratory Report, Attachment 3). There were some concentrations in soils that were expected because of the existence of the UST or because the site is known to have fill materials that contain ash which would account for the low levels of Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon target analytes. All low concentration reported did not exceed MCP reportable concentration (RC) notification requirements. Groundwater sampling was not conducted since no indications of contamination from the soil from the bottom of the excavation. The applicable groundwater standard for this location is GW-2, the standard indicating that the location is not in an aquifer or drinking water supply. Given the soil conditions, expected concentrations would be significantly below the applicable GW-2 standards and therefore verification was not required. Based on the field & laboratory analytical results and observations at the site after the UST removal, a condition of No Significant Risk of harm to human health, safety, public welfare, and the environment was determined at this UST location. No response actions are required at this location. This assessment report was prepared for the exclusive use of Elizabeth Realty Trust to document environmental EPH concentrations beneath the former fuel UST at the above referenced property in Salem, Massachusetts. The conclusions stated were based on observations and laboratory data and professional judgment by SRT personnel. The observations made and results presented in this report are believed to be representative of current conditions at the time of SRT's assessment. No other warranty is expressed, written, or implied. Reproduction of this report or its contents is prohibited without written approval of the client and SRT , Inc. SRT is not responsible for independent conclusions, opinions, or recommendations made by others based on the information contained herein. If you have any questions, please contact SRT at (978) 948-3861. cerely, Timothy A. Toomey, PG/LSP General Manager cc: Town of Salem Fire Deparl<rrent ATTACHMENTS: SU SURFACE REMED A 9 ION TECHNOLOGAES, INC. 355 Central Street a Rowley, Massachusetts 01969 'e/ic.,'/mexi/ (/de 1/.-z& ...'f�rrc •.:77,(7/,/(// LIC Ti n PE MIT Fee: $1 for storage tank removal and transportation to approved tank disposal yard in accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. Chapter 148. Section 38A, 527 CMR 9.00, application is hereby made by: Tank Owner Name (please print) Elizabeth Realty Trust of Essex County X Address 108 Jackson Street Salem Street C,tv Sure Zip racto Company Name H & S Tank Cleaning, Inc. (978) 531-6433 Pnnt Address P.O. Box 2 Amesbury, MA 01913 Print Signature (if applying for permit) IFCI" Certified Other Tank Location 108 Jackson Street rC 7Steet Address Tank Capacity (gallons) -23si=c1allons Tank Dimensions (diameter x length) Oval x 5'L Remarks: UST a ' C • •`sposal�lnfolrrnat� am>!nation tsessmE • Co. or Individual Address Signature (if applying for permit) Print ?tint IFCI" Certified LSP # Other Salem Substance Last Stored Home heating oil ;r( -t- 0 flUir d— PPfr' - C c U Lr S f e)iikP ci! G: CCU �! i w 1 Signature („ appt/irp ;or 3ermr,; MA 01970 Firm transporting waste H & S Tank Cleaning, Inc. State Lic. # MA326 Hazardous waste manifests E.P.A. Approved tank disposal yard Winfield Alloy Inc Tank yard 4` 014 Type of inert gas N/A Tank yard address 1-15 Medford St., Lawrence, MA 01841 I`{ryCity or Town Salem Fire I FDID# ).16-t . Permit# 1 Date of issue 69< 1 3 d L t Date of expiration v t `i i I t. Dig safe approval number: 20112310915 Dig Safe Toll Free Tel. Number - 800-322-4844 Signature / Title of Officer granting permit v a%? .J, ..4,✓ After removal(s) ("Consumptive Use" fuel oil tanks exempted) send Form FP-290R signed by Local Fire Dept. to UST Regulatory Compliance Unit. Department of Fire Services, P.O. Box 1025, State Road, Stow, MA 01775. "International Fire Code Institute FP-292 (revised 4/97) �12e o ` /)2(o i/ (/rt✓Ct%A .y.jfrcAr(,)E)ff} 2 VI!!i'lilrerr[! rrr• �r•Frurv;, /�rl�r� (1 a[ RECEIPT OF DISPOSAL OF UNDERGROUND STEEL STORAGE TANK FORMERLY CONTAINING MOTOR FUEL NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPROVED TANK YARD: WINDF1ELD ALLOY livt;. 15 MEDFORD ST. LAWRFNCF, MA 01841 Approved tank yard no. lTank Yard Ledger 502 CMR 3.03(4) Number I certify under penalty of law I have personally examined me undergroun steel storage tan delivered to this "approved tank yard" by (firm. corporation or partnership) L and accepted same in conformance with Office of the State Fire Marshal Regulations 502 CMR 3.0kS Provisions for Approving Underground Steel Stbrage Tank Dismantling Yards. A valid permit was issued by the head of the LOCAL fire department FDID# O2 `%C'a - Sa 1.e. t . A to transport this tank to this yard. al title of ap roved tank yard owner or owners authorized representative: Title . f�� /fr Date signed: G%r3/V d f/ g 1 TANK DATA: �^ TANK REMOVED FROM: Gallons: -5 3d No. and Street: /08 &. sc.". ¶ Previous contents: µr,..14.-- (4,..'-, `... a tc... City and Town: .cz {-e, . t MA. Diameter: rd Length: S r Notes: Date Received: C,(1311( Serial # (if available) Tank I.D. # (Form FP-290): Fire Dept. Permit #: EACH TANK MUST HAVE A RECEIPT OF DISPOSAL Owner/Operator to mail revised copy of Notification Form (FP290, or FP29OR) to local fire department and: Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Prevention - UST Program P.O. Box 120-0165 Boston, MA 02112-0165 This signed receipt of disposal must be returned to the head of the local fire department. Form FP 291 (Rev. 1 1/2009) Please print or type..(Form designed for use on elite (12-pitch) typewriter.) UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1. Generator ID Number WASTE MANIFEST 5. Generator's Name and Mailing Address Generators Phone: 6. Transporter 1 Company Name 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. Designated Facility Name and Site Address Facititrs Phone: ga. 9b. U.S. DOT Description (including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class. ID Number. HM and Packing Group (if any)) 14. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 2. Page 1 of 3. Emergency Response Phone Form Approved. OMB No. 2050-0039 4. Manifest Tracking Number Generators Site Address (if different than mailing address) �t-i dr 74ces7 U.S. EPA ID Number U.S. EPA ID Number U.S. EPA ID Number 10. Containers 1 11. Total 12. Unit No. Type Quantity Wt./Vol. JJK 13. Waste Codes 15. GENERATOR'S/OFFEROR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by the proper shipping name, and are classified, packaged, marked and iabeled'placarded, and are in all respects in proper condition for transport according to applicable international and rational governmental regulations. If export shipment and i am the Primary Exporter. I certify that the contents of this consignment conform to the terms of the attached EPA Acknowledgment of Consent. I certify that the waste minimization statement identified in 40 CFR 262.27(a) (if I am a large quantity generator) or (b) (if I am a small quantity generator) is true. GeneratorsiOfferors PrintedrTyped Name Signature Month Day ( Year ., 1 1 1 1 16. International Shipments r� z ❑ import to U.S. L_ . Export from U.S. Port of entrylexit: Transporter signature Or exports only): Date leaving U S.. ' u=.J 17. Transporter Acknowledgment of Receipt of Materials 162 ,Transporter 1 Printed/TypedName Signature Month Day Year a i i i I :o I Q Transporter 2 Printed/Typed Name Signature Morin Day Year H 1 9 1 118. Discrepancy ' ' 18a. Discrepancy Indication Space Is 1 120. Designated Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by the manifest except as noted in Item 18a 1 Prtns_d�t; :Na - Signature f 1 E?A Form 87 i43-22 (Rev. 3-05) Previous editions are obsolete. Eli Quantity Type U Residue Manifest Reference Number: 18b..Altemate Facility (or Generator) v u- Facility's Phone: 18c. Signature of Alternate Facility (or Generator) 19. Hazardous Waste Report Management Method Codes (i.e., codes for hazardous waste treatment. disposal, and recycling systems) ow 1. 2. 13. Ill Partial Rejection U.S, EPA ID Number 1 L__1 Full Rejection Month Day Year Month Day .Year I 1 1 Q ' PHOTOS UST Removal - 102 Jackson Street, Salem, MA inside UST UST side upon removal UST Removal From Grave Inside UST UST Removal from grave UST Removal for inspection - no holes noted i 1,�ENT3 TT ACC A 1 v June 27, 2011 Environmental Laboratories Corporat o 111 Herrick Street, Merrimack, NH 03054 TEL: (603) 424-2022 a FAX: (603) 429-8496 www.amrolabs.corri ANALYTICAL TEST RESULTS Tim Toomey Subsurface Remediation Technologies 355 Central St. Rowley, MA 01969 TEL: (978) 948-3861 FAX: (978) 948-3861 Subject: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Workorder No.: 1106044 Dear Tim Toomey: AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. received 1 sample on 6/14/2011 for the analyses presented in the following report. AMRO is accredited in accordance with NELAC and certifies that these test results meet all the requirements of NELAC, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the case narrative. The enclosed Sample Receipt Checklist details the condition of your sample(s) upon receipt. Please be advised that any unused sample volume and sample extracts will be stored for a period of 60 days from sample receipt date (90 days for samples from New York). After this time, AMRO will properly dispose of the remaining sample(s). If you require further analysis, or need the samples held for a longer period, please contact us immediately. This report consists of a total of 9 pages. This letter is an integral part of your data report. All results in this project relate only to the sample(s) as received by the laboratory and documented in the Chain -of -Custody. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. If you have any questions regarding this project in the future, please refer to the Workorder Number above. Sincerely, Nancy Stewart Vice President State Certifications: NH (NELAC): 1001, MA: M-NH012, CT: PH-0758, NY: 11278 (NELAC), ME: NH012 and 1001. Hard copy of the State Certification is available upon request. 1 AMR() Environmental Laboratories Corp. Date: 22-Jun-11 CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Work Order Sample Summary Lab Order: 1106044 Date Received: 6/14/2011 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Date Collection Time 1106044-01A Exc. Bottom 6' 6/13/2011 10:45 AM 1 AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. Lab Order: 1106044 Client: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Sample ID 1106044-01A w Client Sample ID Exc. Bottom 6' Collection Date 22-Jun-11 DATES REPORT Matrix Analytical Test Name Analysis Date Preparatory Test Name Prep Date Batch ID TCLP Date 6/13/2011 10:45:00 AM Soil EPH 1.1, Soil, Full List 6/20/2011 SOPREP AUTOSOXHLET: EPH 6/17/2011 21397 EPH 1.1, Soil, Full List 6/20/2011 6/17/2011 21397 Percent Moisture 6/15/2011 R46883 Relinquished by: (Signatu Relinquished by: (Signature) AMHU Environmental Laboratories Corporation 111 Herrick Street Merrimack, N.H. 03054 Office: 603-424-2022 Fax: 603-429-8496 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Proj No. 1 Project Name t.') 073 CZIP At1 j J (ew ,/144 Samplers (Signs Sta. No. Date Station Location MATRIX Water - A Soil/Soiled-S Type, Waste-W Size, Other-0 & Explain No. of Containers /9g/. 11 /o.' yj > j 1 ' s / 60 C Remarks Si e) Date Time !Receiv y (Si nature) eireY/ LPN' Date Time Received by (Signature) Date Time Received by (Signature) y: (Signature) pat�Time Received for Laboratory by: ,t0/ 64- q 6r/ , ie yi (Sig ure) ❑ Fax to (phone) Results nee d PO # Send Resu to: /ki k-til j "-',A 6/F&- AMRO ProjectN 1©OP�'�-� Seal Intact? Yes No N/A Remarks „A-40A) 4.zej �wrc 6669 21 AMP.O Environmenta( Laboratories-Corporatior Client: l Project Name: Ship via: (circle one) Fed Ex., UPS Hand Del., Other Courier, Other: SAMPLE RECEIPT CHECKLIST �) AMR() ID: 44-00A-) -Cr; J fjZ�N,, /-6¢ Date Rec.: t ±.0 Louric Items to be Checked Upon Receipt 1. Army Samples received in individual plastic bags? 2. Custody Seals present? 3. Custody Seals Intact? 4. Air Bill included in folder if received? 5. Is COC included with samples? 6. Is COC signed and dated by client? 7. Laboratory receipt temperature rt TEMP = 3 Samples rec. with ice v ice packs neither 8. Were samples received the same day they were sampled? Is client temperature = or <6°C ? If no obtain authorization from the client for the analyses. Client authorization from: Date: Obtained by: 9. Is the CDC filled out correctly and completely? 10. Does the info on the COC match the samples? 11. Were samples rec. within holding time? 12. Were all samples properly labeled? 13. Were all samples properly preserved? 14. Were prover sample containers used? 15. Were All samples received intact? (none broken or leaking) 16. Were VOA vials rec. with rio air bubbles? 17. Were the sample volumes sufficient for requested analyses? 18. Were all samples received? 19. VPH and VOA Soils only: Sampling Method VPH (circle one): M=lv. thanol, E=EnCare (air -tight container) Sampling Method VOA (circle one): M=Methanol, SB=Sodium Bisulfate, E=EnCore, B=Bulk .If M or SB: Does preservative cover tl:e soil? • Date Due: Yes No J NA I � v." 1f NO then client must be faxed. Does preservation level come close to the fill line on the vial? If NO then client must be faxed. Were vials provided by AMRO?, • — If NO then weights MUST be obtained from client Was dry weight aliquot provided? If NO then fax client and inform the VOA lab ASAP. 21). Subcontracted Samples: What samples sent: Where Sent: Date: Analysis: TAT: Information entered into: Internal Tracking Log? Dry Weight Log? Client Log? Composite Log? Filtration Log? Received By: ifkj Date: Gam/ }!/ Labeled By: /1"/ - Date: 6 A.F-1 Logged in By: p ie Checked Bv: � � 111 Herrick Street Merrimack_N.EL0305 -I (60 P) 424-2022 Comments Date: 6-/J-7,// Date: 6, -t,S- // ktA_ nl n'..G--,hi= 5 nr./ncmemos/forms/samolerec Rev.19 04/20/09 AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Lab Order: 1106044 MA-DEP EPH 1.1: Date: 24-Jun-11 CASE NARRATIVE 1. AMRO Laboratory analyzed EPH using the GC/MS option as indicated in the MADEP EPH Rev.1.1, Section 9.10 May 2004. 2. The_C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons range result has been adjusted to exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes. 3. No QC deviations were noted. 6 .ass . P ArialyticalProtocol Certificati.o:n:.Form Laboratory Name: AMRO Environmental Lab. Corp. Project Location: /0,2_ Tit on St 3 Z f 't) N4 Project #: RTN: This Form provides certifications for the following data set: list Laboratory:Sample ID Number(s): //O oL/y —o / Matrices: Groundwater/Surface Water Soil/Sediment ✓Drinking Water CAM Protocol (check all that apply below): 8260 VOC CAM II A 8270 SVOC CAM 11 B 6010 Metals CAM III A E 7470/7471 Hg CAM III B 7010 Metals CAM ill C 6020 Metals CAM III D MassDEP VPH CAM IV A MassDEP EPH CAM IV B 8082 PCB CAM V A 8081 Pesticides CAM V B 8151 Herbicides CAM V C 9014 Total Cyanide/PAC CAM VI A Air Other: 7196 Hex Cr CAM VI B 8330 Explosives CAM VIII A 6860 Perchlorate CAM VIII B MassDEP APH CAM IX A TO-15 VOC CAM IX B Affirmative Responses to Questions A through F are required for "Presumptive Certainty" status Were all samples received in a condition consistent with those described on the Chain -of - Custody, properly, preserved (including temperature) in the field or laboratory, and prepared/analyzed within method holding times? Were the analytical method(s) and all associated QC requirements specified in the selected CAM protocol(s) followed? Were all required corrective actions and analytical response actions specified in the selected CAM protocol(s) implemented for all identified performance standard non -conformances? Does the laboratory report comply with all the reporting requirements specified -in CAM VII A, "Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data"? VPH, EPH, APH, and TO-15 only: a. VPH, EPH, and APH Methods only: Was each method conducted without significant modification(s)? (Refer to the individual method(s) for a list of significant modifications). b. APH and TO-15 Methods only: Was the complete analyte list reported for each method? Were all applicable CAM protocol QC and performance standard non -conformances identified and evaluated in a laboratory narrative (including all "No" responses to Questions A through E)? Responses to Questions G, H and I below are required for "Presumptive Certainty" status Were the reporting limits at or below all CAM reporting limits specified in the selected CAM protocol(s)? No es, No Ces, No No Yes No No Data User Note: Data that achieve "Presumptive Certainty" status may not necessarily meet the data usability and representativeness requirements described in 310 CMR 40. 1056 (2)(k) and WSC-07-350. li Were all QC performance standards specified in the CAM protocol(s) achieved? I Were results reported for the complete analyte list specified in the selected CAM protocol(s)? All negative responses must be addressed in an attached laboratory narrative. 1, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Signature: \ Position: Vice President Printed Name: Nancy Stewart 7 Date: 2 F '% DATA COMMENT PAGE Organic Data Oualifiers ND Indicates compound was analyzed for, but not detected at or above the reporting limit. J Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used either when estimating a concentration for tentatively identified compounds where a 1:1 response is assumed, or when the data indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample quantitation limit but greater than the method detection limit. H Method prescribed holding time exceeded. E This flag identifies compounds whose concentrations exceed the calibration range of the instrument for that specific analysis. B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample. R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits. See Case Narrative Micro Data Oualifiers TNTC Too numerous to courit Inor!anic Data Qualifiers ND or U Indicates element was analyzed for, but not detected at or above the reporting limit. J Indicates a value greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but less than the quantitation limit. H Indicates analytical holding time exceedance. B Indicates that the analyte is found in the associated blank, as well as in the sample. MSA Indicates value determined by the Method of Standard Addition E This flag identifies compounds whose concentrations exceed the calibration range of the instrument for that specific analysis. R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits. W Post -digestion spike for Furnace AA analysis is out of control limits (85-115), while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike absorbance. * Duplicate analysis not within control limits. + Indicates the correlation coefficient for the Method of Standard Addition is less than 0.995 See Case Narrative Renort Comments: 1. Soil, sediment and sludge sample results are reported on a "dry weight" basis. 2. Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size used, dilutions and moisture content, if applicable. 8 AIVIRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Lab Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Lab ID: 1106044-01A Analyses MADEP EPH REVISION 1.1 Date: 22-Jun-11 Client Sample ID: Exc. Bottom 6' Collection Date: 6/13/2011 10:45:00 AM Matrix: SOIL Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed MAEPH Analyst: KAM C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND 11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 4:58:00 PM C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 84 11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 4:58:00 PM C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 23 11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Naphthalene ND 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Acenaphthylene ND 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Acenaphthene ND 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Fluorene ND 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Phenanthrene . 0.69 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Anthracene 0.12 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Fluoranthene 1.1 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Pyrene 0.91 0.11 mg/Kg-dry • 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Benz(a)anthracene 0.59 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Chrysene 0.56 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.78 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.31 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene 0.58 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.12 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.36 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.41 0.11 mg/Kg-dry 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 46.0 40-140 %REC 1 6/20/2011 4:58:00 PM Surr: 2-Bromonaphthalene 65.7 40-140 %REC 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 78.0 40-140 %REC 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM Surr: o-Terphenyl 76.9 40-140 %REC 1 6/20/2011 5:35:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: MG Percent Moisture 7.9 0 wt% 1 6/15/2011 9 AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. Date: 24-Jun-11 CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies QC SUMMARY REPORT Work Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Method Blank Sample ID: MB-21397 Batch ID: 21397 .. Test .... . Code: MAEPH Units: mg/Kg Analysis Date: 6/20/2011 1:25:00 PM Prep Date: 6/17/2011 Client ID: Run ID: SV-2_110620A SegNo: 780227 QC Sample QC Spike Original Sample Original Sample Analyte Result RL Units Amount Result %REC LowLimit HighLimit or MS Result %RPD RPDLimit Qua C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND 10 mg/Kg C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons ND 10 mg/Kg Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 1.052 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 52.6 40 140 0 Qualifiers: ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R = RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL - Reporting Limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. NA - Not applicable where J values or ND results occur AMR() Environmental Laboratories Corp. CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Work Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Sample ID: MB-21397 Client ID: Batch ID: 21397 Test Code: MAEPH Units: mg/Kg Run ID: SV-2_110620A Date: 24-Jun-11 . QC SUMMARY REPORT Method Blank Analysis Date: 6/20/2011 2:00:00 PM SeqNo: 780228 Prep Date: 6/17/2011 QC Sample QC Spike Original Sample Original Sample Analyte Result RL Units Amount Result %REC LowLimit HighLimit or MS Result %RPD RPDLimit Qua C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons ND 10 mg/Kg Naphthalene ND 0.10 mg/Kg 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Acenaphthylene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Acenaphthene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Fluorene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Phenanthrene ND 0.10 mg/Kg —' Anthracene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Fluoranthene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Pyrene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Benz(a)anthracene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Chrysene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Benzo(a)pyrene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 0.10 mg/Kg Surr: 2-Bromonaphthalene 1.344 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 67.2 40 140 0 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.512 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 75,6 40 140 0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 1.365 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 68.2 40 140 0 Qualifiers: ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL - Reporting Limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. NA - Not applicable where J values or ND results occur AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Work Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Sample ID: LCS-21397 Batch ID: 21397 Test Code: MAEPH Units: mg/Kg Client ID: Run ID: SV-2_110620A Analyte Date: 24-Jun-I1 QC SUMMARY REPORT Laboratory Control Spike Analysis Date: 6/20/2011 2:35:00 PM SeqNo: 780229 Prep Date: 6/17/2011 QC Sample QC Spike Original Sample Original Sample Result RL Units Amount Result %REC LowLimit HighLimit or MS Result %RPD RPDLimit Qua n-Decane 1.094 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 43.7 40 140 0 n-Docosane 1.762 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 70.5 40 140 0 n-Dodecane 1.216 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 48.6* 40 140 0 n-Eicosane 1.838 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 73.5 40 140 0 n-Hexacosane 1.509 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 60.4 40 140 0 n-Hexadecane 1.65 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 66 40 140 0 n-Hexatriacontane 1.038 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 41.5 40 140 0 N n-Nonadecane 1.766 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 70.6 40 140 0 n-Nonane 0.8395 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 33.6 30 140 0 n-Octacosane 1.426 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 57 40 140 0 n-Octadecane 1.894 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 75.8 40 140 0 n-Tetracosane 1.653 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 66.1 40 140 0 n-Tetradecane 1.466 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 58.7 40 140 0 n-Triacontane 1.328 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 53.1 40 140 0 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 1.143 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 57.2 40 140 0 Qualifiers: ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL - Reporting Limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. NA - Not applicable where J values or ND results occur AMR() Environmental Laboratories Corp. CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies Work Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Sample ID: LCS-21397 Batch ID: 21397 Client ID: Test Code: MAEPH Units: mg/Kg Run ID: SV-2 110620A QC Sample QC Spike Original Sample Analysis Date: 6/20/2011 3:10:00 PM SegNo: 780230 Original Sample Date: 24-Jun-11 QC SUMMARY REPORT Laboratory Control Spike Prep Date: 6/17/2011 Analyte Result RL Units Amount Result %REC LowLimit HighLimit or MS Result %RPD RPDLimit Qua Naphthalene 1.052 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 42.1 40 140 0 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.141 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 45.6 40 140 0 Acenaphthylene 1.316 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 52.7 40 140 0 Acenaphthene 1.278 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 51.1 40 140 0 Fluorene 1.438 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 57.5 40 140 0 Phenanthrene 1.71 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 68.4 40 140 0 Anthracene 1.61 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 64.4 40 140 0 ca Fluoranthene 1.841 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 73.6 40 140 0 Pyrene 1.83 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 73.2 40 140 0 Benz(a)anthracene 1.616 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 64.6 40 140 0 Chrysene 1.821 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 72.8 40 140 0 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.664 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 66.6 40 140 0 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.79 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 71.6 40 140 0 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.842 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 73.7 40 140 0 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1.544 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 61.7 40 140 0 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1.628 0.10 mg/Kg '` 2.5 0 65.1 40 140 0 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.618 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 64.7 40 140 0 Surr: 2-Bromonaphthalene 1.413 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 70.6 40 140 0 Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.506 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 75.3 40 140 0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 1.379 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 69 40 140 0 Qualifiers: ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL - Reporting Limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. NA - Not applicable where J values or ND results occur AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. CLIENT: Subsurface Rernediation Technologies Work Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Sample ID: LCSD-21397 Batch ID: 21397 Client ID: Analyte Test Code: MAEPH Units: mg/Kg Run ID: SV-2_110620A Analysis Date: 6/20/2011 3:46:00 PM SeqNo: 780231 Date: 24-Jun-I1 QC SUMMARY REPORT Laboratory Control Spike Duplicate Prep Date: 6/17/2011 QC Sample QC Spike Original Sample Original Sample Result RL Units Amount Result %REC LowLimit HighLimit or MS Result %RPD RPDLimit Qua n-Decane 1.188 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 47.5 40 140 1.094 8.33 25 n-Docosane 1.904 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 76.2 40 140 1.762 7.77 25 n-Dodecane 1.382 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 55.3 40 140 1.216 12.9 25 n-Eicosane 1.874 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 75 40 140 1.838 1.94 25 n-Hexacosane 1.569 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 62.8 40 140 1.509 3.9 25 n-Hexadecane 1.705 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 68.2 40 140 1.65 3.28 25 n-Hexatriacontane 1.065 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 42.6 40 140 1.038 2.62 25 'A n-Nonadecane 1.862 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 74.5 40 140 1.766 5.29 25 n-Nonane 0.9005 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 36 30 140 0.8395 7.01 25 n-Octacosane 1.474 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 58.9 40 140 1.426 3.31 25 n-Octadecane 1.949 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 78 40 140 1.894 2.84 25 n-Tetracosane 1.636 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 65.4 40 140 1.653 1.06 25 n-Tetradecane 1.55 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 62 40 140 1.466 5.5 25 n-Triacontane 1.434 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 57.4 40 140 1.328 7.68 25 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 1.172 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 58.6 40 140 0 0 0 Qualifiers: ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S - Spike Recoveiy outside accepted recovery limits J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL - Reporting Limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank NA - Not applicable where J values or ND results occur AMRO Environmental Laboratories Corp. Date: 24-Jun-11 CLIENT: Subsurface Remediation Technologies QC SUMMARY REPORT Work Order: 1106044 Project: 102 Jackson St. Salem, MA Laboratory Control Spike Duplicate Sample ID: LCSD-21397 Batch ID: 21397 Test Code: MAEPH Units: mg/Kg Analysis Date: 6/20/2011 4:22:00 PM Prep Date: 6/17/2011 Client ID: Run ID: SV-2_110620A SegNo: 780232 QC Sample QC Spike Original Sample Original Sample Analyte Result RL Units Amount Result %REC LowLimit HighLimit or MS Result %RPD RPDLimit Qua Naphthalene 1.025 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 41 40 140 1.052 2.65 25 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.099 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 44 40 140 1.141 3.75 25 Acenaphthylene 1.238 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 49.5 40 140 1.316 6.11 25 Acenaphthene 1.236 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 49.4 40 140 1.278 3.3 25 Fluorene 1.418 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 56.7 40 140 1.438 1.4 25 Phenanthrene 1.676 0.10 mg/Kg _ 2.5 0 67 40 140 1.71 2.07 25 Anthracene 1.685 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 67.4 40 140 1.61 4.55 25 c.71 Fluoranthene 1.81 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 72.4 40 140 1.841 1.7 25 Pyrene 1.847 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 73.9 40 140 1.83 0.925 25 Benz(a)anthracene 1.664 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 66.6 40 140 1.616 2.96 25 Chrysene 1.926 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 77 40 140 1.821 5.63 25 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.811 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 72.4 40 140 1.664 8.43 25 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.763 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 70.5 40 140 1.79 1.49 25 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.91 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 76.4 40 140 1.842 3.62 25 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1.702 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 68.1 40 140 1.544 9.77 25 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1.667 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 66.7 40 140 1,628 2.34 25 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.746 0.10 mg/Kg 2.5 0 69.8 40 140 1.618 7.61 25 Surr:2-Bromonaphthalene 1.318 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 65.9 40 140 0 0 0 Surr:2-Fiuorobiphenyl 1.46 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 73 40 140 0 0 0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 1.368 0.10 mg/Kg 2 0 68.4 40 140 0 0 0 Qualifiers: ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits J - Analyte detected below quantitation limits R - RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL - Reporting Limit; defined as the lowest concentration the laboratory can accurately quantitate. B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank NA - Not applicable where J values or ND results occur LIMS Sample ID: LCS-21397 Test Code: EPH1.1S Instrument ID: SV2 AROMATIC FRACTION(S): lAnalyte Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene ALIPHATIC FRACTION(S): Analyte Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough Report File ID C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA1062011E\21304821.D C:\HPCHEM\1 \DATA\062011 E\2B04821. D File ID C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\062011 E\2B04820.D C:\HPCHEM\1\DATA\062011E\2B04820.D Naphthalene Breakthrough: 0.231028742 % 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough: 0.012896435 % lAmount Amount 21.0498 22.8229 0:048744 0.002944 16 LIMS Sample ID: LCSD-21397 Test Code: EPH1.1S Instrument ID: SV2 ATIC FRACTION(S): Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene ALIPHATIC FRACTION(S): Anaiyte Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough Report File ID C:\HPCHEM\11DATA\062011E12604823.D C:\HPCHEM111DATA1062011E12B04823.D File ID C:\HPCHEM111DATA\062011E12604822.D C:\HPCHEMMDATA1062011E\21304822.D Naphthalene Breakthrough: 0.498268421 % 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough: 0.024262133 % Amount Amount 20.4959 21.9781 0.102636 0.005334 17