The URL can be used to link to this page

0003 BROAD STREET - BUILDING JACKET 3 I3KDAC? ST Laversal, �� UU! lill 1•" c Rene C. Lamarre Co., Inc. General Contractors ` 23 Oakview Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 < 17 November '89 m CP L r� M ri o .yo 3 a The Architects Collaborative, Inc. 46 Brattle Street Fo co Cambridge, MA 02138 Attn: Roger Sheppard Re: Olivet School Salem Housing Gentlemen: #667-7A Please be advised that the "Board of Electricians' Appeals" has handed down a favorable decision for "LeVangie Electric Company" with instructions to approve the contested electrical work. . . . (See enclosure - 3 pages dated 14 Nov. '89). In review (of the decision) with Mr. J. J. Giardi, I have been informed this date, that the Wire Inspector will exercise his right to appeal (within 30 days). . . . Mr. Giardi has agreed to meet with me, to "Sign off" the electrical work (maybe by 23 Nov. '89) rather than create a "Hardship" to Salem Housing Authority. . . . I will endeavor to coordinate the Sign off with a meeting of the Building Department to expedite the issuance of "Certificates of Occupancy". . . . I will advise you of any other delays or events as they develop. Very truly yours, �c� Bab ."-�r�bicase BA/mw ^' cc: E. Hart, SHA w/ 3 page enclosure B. Danilecki, EOCD " J. Santo, Bldg. Insp." to R J. Giardi B. Ambrose File 009;,01141 v 6w, r YQLBtt rlera it,I/ �oue"t"nl nlen t00 ��nnr�xul�e ,ft'rcrt, T f�od�on O"w2 BO RD OF ELECTRICIANS' APPEALS 617 727 9931 IN THE f4kT ER OF ) DOCKET NO. SO File No, BAE&Aa 89-74 LeVangie E ec ric Company ) v ) John J. Jikrd , ) Inspecto f fires ) City of Sa em MA ) ' ' FINAL DECISION —YR MING PURSUANT TO M.G.L. C. 143, as. 3L and 3P M.C.L. c• 3OAF as. 10 and 11 The Boetde of Regletrallon within 16 D Yleion I Registration; ALLIED HEALTH-ARCHITECTS BA KERS CHInOPRACTORS•DENTISTRY-DISPENSING OPTICIANS-EMBALMING AND FUNERAL DIRECTING-PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND PROFESSION L L NDS RVEYORS.ELECTRICIANS•ELECTROLOGISTS•HAIRDRESSERS•IIEALTH OFFICERS•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. NURSING•NURSING HOME AD INI TRAT FIS.OPERATORS OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES•OPTOMETRY•PHARMACY•PLUMBERS AND GASFITTERS • PODIATRY .PSYCHOLOOIST • I JBLIC CCOUNTANCY •RAI)10 ANI) TFI FVI.SION TFCHNICIANA .RFAI FATATF RROKFRR AND SALESMEN . nEBPIRATORY 74VAP19Y•SANITARIANS•S CIA WOR GAS•SPrECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY•VETERINARY MEDICINE. IJ JIf Gli JJI 'O4Ji Lr-VhlJ'o IL LLL1_ Ir II_ 1_U. II'JI_. UUI P'VJ x . I. State e t of the Case A. N to a of the Proceeding hii proceedingg was heard by the Board of le tricians ' A eels (the Board) on Monday, September 51 1989 at 11 :00 A.M. in Room 10D Leverett Saltonstall ui ding, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts, ur uant to its authority under M.G.L. c. 1439 s. 3P nd M.G.L. c. 30A9 sa. 10 and 11 . The proceeding was ra ght before the Board by LeVangie Electric Company (Le angie ) , 978 Washington Street , Weymouth, Massachusetts, to fetermine if a notice rendered by John J.Giardi , ins ector of Wires for the City of Salem was in con- for ity with the Massachusetts Electrical Code# 527 CMR 12.00 at seq. The Aepellant , LeVangie, re- quested that the Board exercise it authority to reverse the ruling by the Inspector of Wires. B. lismry of the Proceedinit eVgie was engaged to install wirin4 at 3 Broad Street, Salled , Massachusetts. Included in this wiring were kitchen ouer receptacles, some of which are over the counter pa , some of which are not . Each of these receptacles s with a separate 20-Ampere Branch Circuit. This se reason for the the interpretation of the intent fticle 220-4b-2# of the Massachusetts Electrical ode , 527 CMR 12.00. ohi J. Giardi Inspector of Wires , City of Salem, er ed notice In the form of a letter dated ug st 21 , 1989 to Mr. Stephen LeVangie, listing viola- io of Article 220-4b-2 of the Massachusetts Electrical ode, 527 CMR 12.00 as stated above. No other violations er cited at this time. n ugust 23, 1989 LeVangie requested in writing a hearing of re the Board on the ruling made by John J. Giardi and ub itted the required fee. Ii. Conclusion of Law i[ u animous consent of the Board on October 23, 19899 was so ! J _-' II - i : IJ JC Gl _31 x:43 LV .-"fJUIL tL L I GII_ U. IIY l,. VVI 1`11.14 2 F rt VC TEDt That under the Board' s interpretation, the intent of Article 220-4b-2 is met as the counter spaces are small in width and therefore only require one recep- tacle. Furthermore, if only one recepptacle is re- gired , it need only be fed with one 20-Ampere Branch Circuit . There are other circuits installed in the kitchen area which are on other 20-Ampere Branch Circuits thus satisfying the requirements of Article 120-4b-2. III . Con 1 jhr The B concludes that it is not the intent of Article 220-4 )-2hat two circuits be connected to one receptacle out e t that if more than one outlet is installed over the k an counter, that a minimum of two circuits be required for tiesoutlets. Therefore, the Board upholds the appeal of LeV nIf lectric Company and hereby orders Mr. John J. Gia d approve this portion of the work. IV. Ri h eal You r eby notified of your Risht to Appeal this Decision puns a M.G.L. c . 30A, s. 14 within thirty (30) days of rece p o this Decision. BOARD OF ELECTRICIANS ' APPEALS Jameer ers, xecutve ecretary Dated: Tie 14 h day of November 1989. ccs L V ng a Electric Company 8332 595 370 9 8 Wa hington Street W ou h, MA 02189 A t nt ons Mr. Stephen LeVangie M Jo n J. Giardi 8332 595 371 I Spector of Wires C t of Salem 4 of A tte Street 8 1 01970 '•„ Rene C. Lamarre Co., Inc. General Contractors 23 Oakview Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 23 FES E�VED "uss. 22 November '89 Page 1 eft*AF St,E=t Building Inspection Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Jim Santo Re: Oliver-School #3 Broad Street___ ._ Salem Housing Gentlemen: #667-7A Please allow me to acknowledge the agreement to provide the following items required for occupancy permits at referenced job. . . . 1. Letter of completion, in compliance with Chapter #127.3.3 of the MGL Code by contractor, Rene C. Lamarre Co. , Inc. , (see attached) . 2. Two (2) GFR will be relocated (as agreed 20.11/89 between John Giardi - Steve LeVangie - and myself) to locate the ground fault recepticals at center of available counter space in Units #101 and #201, (without additional cost to owner) . 3. Three (3) emergency light fixtures will be provided at two (2) handicap shower rooms, and one (1) handicap toilet. . . . Roger Sheppard, The Architects Collaborative, Inc. , is in agreement that we will provide costs to arrive at this omitted design item by the most economical means possible, also, the E.O.C.D. is aware of the omission, and we will advise Bill Miller - Project Engineer, of the cost simultan- eous with notification to the designer. . . . 4. "As built" Drawings will be provided to the Fire Marshall's office to Captain Turner and to you at Building Inspector's office - which reflect the myrid of changes required to provide the owner with this facility. s 22 November '89 Building Inspection Department Page 2 of 2 Jim Santo In closing, my thankyous to the City of of Salem - Fire Marshall, Wire Inspectors and Building Department to expedite Occupancy Permits for Salem Housing Authority in order to reduce the hardship of further delay in use of this Residence for the Elderly. Very trul yours, r ob Ambrose BA/mw cc: J. Giardi, Salem Wire Inspector E. Hart, Salem Housing Authority S. Zisson, " " " S. LeVangie, LeVangie Electric Co. R. Sheppard, TAC (with copies of permits) B. Ambrose File '•„ Rene C. Lamarre Co., Inc. General Contractors 23 Oakview Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 November 22, 1989 Building Inspection Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Jim Santo Re: Oliver School - Salme Housing #667-7A 3 Broad Street, Salem, MA Gentlemen: Be advised the project at #3 Broad Street - Designated Congregate Housing for the Elderly, has been completed per specifications and drawings as prepared by The Architects Collaborative, Inc. of Cambridge, MA, and to the best of my knowledge, meets all the building codes, both local and state. We have obtained all inspections and discharges required from the respective departments necessary for full occupancy. Respectfully, �j��iy✓�Gc��_ ene C. Lalnarr President RCL/mw THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS) IM ^�C � DATA e Division of Inspection Elevator Section r e/ r P' "rTo: ,, �E�� C�L. �m�2RE � . Date JLc � �/ 3 (5k0AS) sq-,-- r�� a:X a #9 EE:" Annual'Inspection 6 Safety Test of your Elevator(s), Dumbwaiters(s) and/or Escalator(s). As-'he,result of my inspection and/or safety test on -a -�f located at - /3jfA&y S4 Ldr-iyl the following work must be completed before a certificate will be issued allowing the use of subject elevator: ;V 3. a. _ . . .... 'The nanfuea1t1j of Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 ELEVATOR DIVISION ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, BOSTON 02108 CERTIFICATE FOR USE OF ELEVATOR -- -�� Chapter 143, General Laws, as amended. —1 Copaciry.QSG{dC –Pounds Speed A90 feet Per Min. L'�/y1 Inspector, - � opection� If the above re Expires 1year frelnabove date' ��(�5 the use of thi� will prohibit In Case of Accident Notify the Chief af Inspections at Once Necessarywork ` an ,r ees must be iled with this Department before work may be started and if conditions warrant, plans must also be filed (G.L. C. 143, S. 62 8, 62A). CC:'pY Elevator Company e Elevator Inspector 2 ,1 1 L/ PENALTY C, 143, S. 71 General Laws: Any person violating or failing to comply with any provision .oflseFtions sixty-two to seventy, inclusive, or of any regulation established thereunder'sha1T°be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars r ' EL-SA(Revised) THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 021388 a 31 March 1989 =, Salem Building Department One Salem Green co z Salem, MA 01970 $m o z. rn ATTN: Mr. Steve Santry ti o0 'RE__3 Broad'Street,--SalemElderly Housing Gentlemen, At the request of the Contractor and in accordance'with the intent of Section 127 of the State Building Code, we have made an inspection of unit apartment numbers 203, 204,205 and 207 on the second floor of the subject project., and common areas 101 ,102,103,104, 105 (rear vestibule), and 106 on the first floor. From that inspection on 31 March 1989 it is our opinion that, to the best of our knowledge, the areas noted are in substantial conformance with the contract drawings and applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code and that installation of wallboard may continue, to close up partitions and ceilings in these areas. . We note that the Contractor is not satisfied with the drying out of the sprayed on insulation at exterior walls and will not close these up at this time. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator cc: R. Sabin TAC Reggie Peters TAC Rene C. Lamarre File THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 021388 20 March 1989 Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ✓ HTTN: Mr. Steve Santry RE: 3 Broad-Street,-Salem-Elderly.Housing Gentlemen, road_Street, SalemElderly.HousingGentlemen, At the request of the Contractor and in accordance with the intent of Section 127 of the State Building Code, we have made an inspection of unit apartment numbers 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 211 , 212, 213, 214 and 215 on the first and second floors of the subject project. From that inspection on 14 March 1989 it is our opinion that, to the best of our knowledge, the areas noted are in substantial conformance with the contract drawings and applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code and that installation of wallboard and ceilings may proceed. We have drawn the contractor's attention to two items which he has said will be completed before requesting your inspection; 1 . Floor holes for electric conduit are to be firestopped around the sleene and the conduit. 2. Dwelling unit separations above ceiling are to have conduit and cable holes firestopped and areas where heating pipes off-set are to be closed up to maintain the 1 hour separation. This letter superseeds ours of 15 March 1989 on the same subject. If you have questions please call. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. `�� 4� Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator cc: R. Sabin TAC Reggie Peters Tac Rene C. Lamarre File THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 15 March 1989 Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 0. rt T. 6 ATTN: Mr. Stephen Santry RE: 3 Broad,Street : _w Gentlemen, At the request of the Contractor and persuant to provisions of Section 127 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, we have made an inspection of unit apartment numbers 117,118,119,120, 121, 211 , 212, 213, 214 and 215 on the first and second floors of the Elderly Housing project at 3 Broad Street. From our inspection on 14 March 1989 it is our determination that the areas noted are in conformance with the contract documents and installation of wallboard and ceilings may proceed. We have drawn the contractor's attention to two items which he has said will be completed before requesting your inspection; 1. Floor holes for electric conduit are to be firestopped around the sleeve and the conduit. 2. Dwelling unit separations above ceiling are to have conduit and cable holes firestopped and areas where heating pipes off-set are to be closed up to maintain the 1 hour separation. We shall be at the site again Friday 17 March and will review these items. If you have any questions please call. Yours truly, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. �2� S141 Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator cc: R. Sabin TAC Reggie Peters TAC File '•" Rene C. LamaCo., Inc. SULI,DINeO€t�T General Contractors 23 Oakview Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 NA.R 41 9 03 R4 '819 RE-Elq0 March 23, 1989 CITY ®F Salem Building Department i One Salem Green Salt, MA 01970 � Attn: Steve Santry-Inspector Re Oliver Scliool"`_1_ Salem Housing J Gentlemen: LL 667,7A____jj This letter will acknowledge, per your request, compliance with the Massachusetts State Building Code, for referenced project. RCL Co. , Inc. under contract to the Salem Housing Authority, (said contract governed by the Executive Office of Communities and Development of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts) is operating in full compliance with the intent of Section #127 of the State Building Code. Under said Section 127 (Controlled Construction) RCL Co. , Inc. must, and has complied with the orders, directives, verbal instructions of the Designer, "TAC" (please see enclosure - 20 March 89) in providing good building practice in compliance with the Code, as interperted applicable to this structure by the Designer. In acknowledgement of the meeting at job site between Bob Ambrose of this office (9:00 a.m. - 20 March '89) with Steve Santry of the Building Department - Salem, Mass. , please allow me to reiterate, that installation of Gypsum board on ceilings and walls will be confined to "One Wall Face" ONIY at interior partitions, and access for inspection of ceiling areas will be provided as for final inspection. Installation of "Abut-Wall" Spacer Gyp will be allowed at exterior wall conditions, where required. PRIOR to request for permission for closure of walls and ceilings: RCL Co. , Inc. will first inspect and tend to proper placing of fire stopping, installation of blocking, where required for surface mounted accessories, etc. , and will view for clearance of wiring, and possible damage by screw penetrations. Salem Building Department -2- March 23, 1989 "TAC" job inspector, with the Clerk of Works in presence will then (as required by Section 127) inspect and provide approval for RCL Co. , Inc. to "Close up '. . . . . In hopes that this acknowledgement meets with your approval, I remain. . . WVer t ly yours, ne C. Tamarre RCL/tray Enc. cc: R. Sheppard, TAC R. Peters, Salem Housing Authority B. Ambrose, RCL Co. , Inc. File THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. e9le et ell' 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 021388 -- --- 20 March 1989 Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ATTN: Mr. Steve Santry RE: 3 Broad Street, Salem Elderly Housing Gentlemen, At the request of the Contractor and in accordance with the intent of Section 127 of the State Building Code, we have made an inspection of unit apartment numbers 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 211 , 212, 213, 214 and 215 on the first and second floors of the subject project. From that inspection on 14 March 1989 it is our opinion that, to the best of our knowledge, the areas noted are in substantial conformance with the contract drawings and applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code and that installation of wallboard and ceilings may proceed. We have drawn the contractor's attention to two items which he has said will be completed before requesting your inspection; 1. Floor holes for electric conduit are to be firestopped around the sleene and the conduit. 2. Dwelling unit separations above ceiling are to have conduit and cable holes firestopped and areas where heating pipes off-set are to be closed up to maintain the 1 hour separation. This letter superseeds ours of 15 March 1989 on the same subject. If you have questions please call. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. r))v v-1 �4J Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator cc: R. Sabin TAC Reggie Peters Tac ,,Rene C. Lamarre File //WQL6/L t�i e.i�d0 �llfC6lI/ �evere�l Jat!ran4rfit`r! �.fJuc�n�, �overotment< 7oenlex MICHAEL S, DUKAKIS Governor A/ n /yam / Jeel 0.2202 PAULA W, GOLD UU Secretary BOARD OF ELECTRICIANS ' APPEALS Notice of Hearing To: City of Salem Docket No. 50 Electrical Department File N0. BEA 89-74 44 Layette Street Salem, MA 01970 Attention: John J. Giardi , Inspector of Wires In the Matter of: rn John J. Giardi, ° Inspector of Wires o;, N F City of Salem (;c `, VS. LeVangie Electric Company RE: Installation at 3 _Broad Street, Salem y 1 tJf You are hereby notified that the Board of Electricians ' Appeals will hold a hearing in RM 10D, Leverett Saltonstall Building, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA. on Monday, September 259 1989 at 11 :00 A.M. , in accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. 143, Section 3P. , M.G.L. c 30A s . 10 and s. 11 . This hearing is relative to a notice of a requirement rendered by the Inspector of Wires , John P. Giardi , for the City of Salem, pertaining to an installation which is electrical in nature performed on the premises of 3 Broad Street, Salem, MA. It will be your privilege to be accompanied or represented by counsel if you so desire. You may subpoena witnesses and documents for presentation at the hearing. The hearing will be conducted in accordance with provisions of M.G.L. c. 30A. �I The Boards of Registration within the Division of Registration: ALLIED HEALTH•ARCHITECTS•BARBERS•CHIROPRACTORS•DENTISTRY•DISPENSING OPTICIANS•EMBALMING AND FUNERAL DIRECTING•PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS•ELECTRICIANS•ELECTROLOGISTS•HAIRDRESSERS•HEALTH OFFICERS•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS NURSING•NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATORS•OPERATORS OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES•OPTOMETRY•PHARMACY•PLUMBERS AND GASFITTERS •PODIATRY•PSYCHOLOGISTS• PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY• RADIO AND TELEVISION TECHNICIANS• REAL ESTATE BROKERS AND SALESMEN • RESPIRATORY THERAPIST•SANITARIANS•SOCIAL WORKERS•SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY•VETERINARY MEDICINE. 1 Page 2 If you wish, you may, at your own expense, arrange to have a stenographer present to record the hearing. If so arranged, you must then provide a copy of the transcript to the Board at your own expense. (801 C.M.R. 1 .01 (10) (k) . ) BOARD OF ELECTRICIANS' APPEALS BY: a',�7 CG2Z1&2-�:� Paula M. King, min str t ve ssistant Dated the Seventh day of September, 1989 Copy to: Mr. John J. Giardi Inspector of Wires City Hall in Salem 44 Layette Street Salem, MA 01907 R332 595 350 Elayne M. Hart Exec. Dir. Housing Authority 44 Layette Street Salem, MA 01970 R332 595 352 William Munroe Bldg Inspector 44 Layette Street Salem, MA 01970 R332 595 353 Robert Turner Fire Prevention 44 Layette Street Salem, MA 01970 R332 595 354 LeVangie Electric Company 978 Washington Street Weymouth, MA 02189 R332 595 351 RECEIVCD P , Salem •Hou_ , .CITY O F SALEM JUL 2 5 1989 � tg Time In City Council, June 22, 1989 T��awive W:! Ordered: That the Mayor is authorized to grant an easement relative to municipal real estate on Broad Street subject to approval as to form and legal description by the City Solicitor. In City Council June 22 , 1989 Referred to the Committee on Community Development In City Council July 13, 1989 Adopted by a roll call vote of 10 yeas, 0 nays , 1 absent Motion for immediate reconsideration in the hopes it would not prevail was denied Approved by the Mayor on July 19, 1989 ,.trWCp _ ATTEST: JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO CITY CLERK 21 •„ Rene C. Lamarre Go., Inc. General Contractor 23 Oakvi"Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 i s "� + �� 4 .6T,>, , 2 22 August 189 Page 1 ' o 2 {1 �tY tc R 1r Ys io The Architects Collaborative, Inc. 46 Brattle Street Cambridge, MA 02138 ��.F�1f d�%• i "...1t � Attn: Roger She w ' g Sheppard Re: Oliver So Salem Housing Gentlemen: #667 IeV Enclosed are (7) seven copies of data and desires as ""•' requested and demanded by the .Inspectors of referenced t project - City of Salem, Massachusetts. . . c t; 1 . The electrical inspection of project resulted with`. approval of the installation - no sign off. . .See letter (21 August 189) John Giardi, Electrical Inspector. . .personal interpretation of State and National Code requirements. . . The Electrical Sub- contractor has filed for a hearing and�determina- ? tion of requirements. . . (State level) . . . ? •- +'vs 2. If it is a ruling that a second duplex receptical on seperate circuit is required ® (+ 12"-161f) counter space available. . .the cost and agreed upon #; requirements of additional work will be determined C 8 September 189 meeting with TAC-EOCD-SHA and General Contractors and Sub-contractor trades in- � volved. . .Work will be provided only by "time and material" proceed order. . .Costa will include on- , x> going direct costs, including insurance, taxes, A.. utilities, management, etc. . . , • j 3. This work will NOT PROCEED without agreed to, w' spelled out than e order. . . (fourteen kitchens) . 4. The remaining (6� six enclosures ar.e data and (3) F . three page letter from Fire Department to City Inspector Q Building Department. . . (Dated 4/4/88) 5. The letter (Dated 4 April 1988) clearly reflects , ;a;, requirements of the Fire Code that was required before this project began, y 6. The Fire Department, to date, has not received re- �a :a vised plans (as agreed to) from your office - See reference : copy to Joe Carroll, and SHA. . .The Fire Department very graciously allowed the work to proceed (see stamped drawing enclosure) ,Y 4 •ut dry_}, q �S<}.Yy41C 1 22 August 189 TAC Pafe 2 of }.t e k"> 7. . .has very professionally agreed to inspect the 47 facility and inform us of Code Required changes that have never been included in the contract documents. . . 8. . . .Until such time as the Fire Department re- ceives revised plans, and inspects the building for compliance, in order to proceed with as early completion as possible, . . .RCL Co. , LeVangie Electric, McCarthy Mechanical will proceed to make required changes (based upon the agreement of your office) and keep time and material to be signed by Clerk of Works. . . 9. RCL Co. , Inc. will provide C. 0. data on 8 September 189. to include: c a. Cost to F/I Knox Box (key keeper) - Fire Department requirement b. Fees to inspect smoke detectors ( 14 units) - City of � Salem requirement C. Cost to F/I additional heat detectors required d. Cost to replace F/A street light with horn - light unit e. Cost to F/I key switch and signal buzzer at vestibule in lieu of specified equipment. . . f. Cost to F/I metal letters + 31 " high at ;street face of building corner - near or above the Master Fire Alarm Box. . . "3 BROAD STREET" g. Co-t to provide Asbuilt Drawings to the Fire Department in lieu of those promised in April 1988 for approval of the Fire Marshall. . . h: Cost to furnish and install additional fire extinguishers where required by order of�:the Fire Marshall. . . i. Bond fees surcharge for filed Sub-contractors Ver ruly`� A ', ob Ambrose S' ..IVC •f j5d &' BA/bsa t Enclosures EOCD - A. Ring ) Clerk of Works - R. Peters �— City of Salem Building Inspector S. Santry City of Salem Fire Marshall R. Turner SHA - E. Hart SHA - S. Zisson File B. Ambrose 411 r�` r • J T't 17 of ttlem, tts�Mc ax�E## ^ 'Electrical Pepxrlmen# 111I1t �:�tMl�t �x A 44 � � '3 d• t 1�Q M If'�L ' August 21 , 1989' ' Mr. Stephen Levangi e , 9 Levangie Electric Company , Inca kms, ` KN s Vqw Sx' 918 Washington `Street � �Weymouth , Massachusetts 02189 �' , :x s * Y, Re: 3 Broad Street '' t Dear Mr Levangie ; r i� Please be advised , I cannot give=you final approval because` Problem that exists in the kitchen area of the dwelling .units Th.e requirements of the National and 1987 Massachusetts," Code , which states "Countertop receptacle outlets installed in; then shall be supplied by 'not less than two small hppliance `branch° ci.r ' cuits" . The article I am referring to is Article 220-4B-2. ' My`.Zinter,- " pretation of this article would say that you shall have `a minimum ofot two small appliance branch circuits available at the main6counterto Yours truly, `Q"ha John J: Giardi Wire Inspector (' �• 'rnt yr cc ; Elayne M. Hart, Exec . Dir: Housing Authority William Munroe, Building Inspector Robert Turner, Fire Prevention �` Letter hand delivered 8-21-89 J J G/m " , r , ..,,;;** #r mow.,?'".. k ! Y Y „ '; ✓ , ! r p � }7 9 w V41, t t yyy� 'yY i ►� ,;` „ CAty of 6RIC111, Alafloatl uattl g dire ZDtParhnmt JjenagUnrterg 481n[apette 01reet 0alttil Joseph F. Sullivan . An.01970 Chief INA August 22, 1989 ,,'• "°"''t ". ; r l�� "� '• C a P� "t`,w ►oa.0 .` �'iwt;� ' �d eel • ' -� ��D ��,,t�►� 1. Square-B silence alarm switch and trouble horn at remote anhUri C14♦:diYry�" 3 j "�"�w l,to1� t 2. Hang fire extinguishers (10 16. ABC type) at locations discusaed WithtL IJ A�WdW ". Bob Ambrose on 8/22/89 .t t (.. loA •Ic, �u.b-Ia_If ; .. � D ir' rj�„t 1 fl ta�M, {� -> 3. Install system heat detectors in handicapped bthrooms on first second floors. —•'- ` ;,�,ItC t, 11&4- =4- 11 3 u61,e A r. a �j/e,•yr<- —a4. Check magnetic door holders for / proper operation. --�r5. Check proper method for the testing of the Gamewell system smoke v5 detectors and test same: ��yD .�s• . yt' +ljs��`� ry.0 0. Number the building in nccordance with the Salem City Ordinance for the numbering oif buildingr. ,Vz`� � ��e�- s ou Mtelc � Fleu�-N/i�I eeHNtbi a6��• h Mat►t Alat ►ti l�exr�r, - �� /f. (;7 v 7' Inslnll Knox Box at tonin entrance adjacent to the remote fire, alarm 77annunciator. -',,.,•/rod 7n /,i�r2t� vC,-AT, b✓/'L S. Thq heat detectors presently located in the basement area are okay+` �ACt�AA19d ` 9. Replace the rotating red beacon near the fire alarm box with a j �'ohl weatherproof horn/sl.robe, connected to the ALARM function of the FACP. Irl r 10. provide key (ta ged as to function) for the Knox B ✓� ropsTeP -^-- Pi�k.�rlur •{o�'lu.e#1� {" N'� 11. Arrange for a test of the master fire alarm box. 1::'Hlal�,v dF,le►�''y * 9,,L lm ° M. ids . y w N d Ca�;t T v► Wci_ It)tll �rov� g tt,e 411rvd7�/,rt Ae�rY �, oto f la. �, hoc-o-ive. A.6-but�� ~ �' �. t► r n iya...."rs.+ Cts e 7 KD, is 0vim, „ 4, �zI'tIt1ph ov,d�G �r ►tT .y �+ [ _—_� ��nl•e 1-v Nnla t1•p La ! .,�',�i�rs� ��•�4 {�{ Ill A.I, rr 'I into ` V►11 {a y�Mek� 4 � 1 v[•"d'` �Q ��awmtY.h e� MdWV 4v 6-0. AVAlLAbiQ 4 N �=►-lday. . m..es y t 't;], • x' t �4 F.r:i� k<'S'' �w+a�" '�I' Y. t rt t *t 'f (Ullifu1 DE �$aleili� ''P�.mi�• ire jlepnrlmeMt 3'l e.ily,tttrlrre .° "x 'x+�l ��e� � x " •IR �Iinfnl;etlr Tirrrt r ,; � ,`r�ke.cT�, �� =k' •�� .t nlrin, �iia:�ttlertt "; � � �,H ro- t � ,y Jin�ph R 5ulhvun 0. ; t o 4 i April City of Salem Mrt William Hi Munroe, I11spect6f'bf Buildings tii �8 One Salphi Green l Salem# Ma' 01970 na t 3p,s 'st r 'y f Dear Mrs Munroe: air I have reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed congregates ire housing at #3 Broad Street, and have conferred with Assistant Building Inspector Mr: Steve Santry relative to the occupancy class of the Pi W use, and offer the following comments and/or conditions of approval:,,t 1. The proposed use of the building has been determined by to be that of a Group Nome as defined by Article 424.1 of the KR Massachusetts State Building Code: ,f„ �< r ",NO "In determining the classification for proposed use, group 'kssy3a 1„ residence shall not be construed as being similar in any way to atYs multi-family dwelling, two-family dwelling; boarding house, lodging house, dormitory, hotel, school or institution of an hind. For building code purposes, it shall be treated as ayeak single-family residential building. The Salem Fire Department reserves the right to an opiniongfrom the State Building Code Commission relative to the clasaificaHoh f � S of the proposed use of this propertyi Attached is a copy of the code revision proposal form dated. Malcw 13, 1987, the intention of which was to place within theA � Massachusetts State Building Code a definition of a congregate dwelling unit and to define the applicable use group classification. The request for an opinion from the Building Code Commission stems from the confusion g generated by conflictin a opinions relative to classification. ?' '•" 2. The building is of Type III"Construction (Exteriori'Protectedh' i Combustfble)i ., :`k x ti xKSM t3f" U i k s, Ul wsa iP #xr��y exp 4{y'T -sj}- V. 3. Should thia building fall under an "R-2" classification as outlined in the code revision proposal, the basement area of building shall be protected by a system of automatic aprinkIeta,, - as per Massachusetts State Building Code Article 1202.13 whereasg ° KF '�"a5 � a the area of the basement exceeds 2,500 square feet. The installation of the sprinkler system shall be in accordance � �r��y `hy with the provisions of NFPA 13 (Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems) and Massachusetts State Building Code Article s r ' 1204.0 (Water Sprinkler Systems). AAS•+4 tse tr . 5. The installation of the standpipe system shall be in accordance# z with the provisions of NFPA 14 (Standard for the Installation Standpipe and Hose Systems), and Massachusetts State Building cr Code Article 1211.0 (SLandpihe Systems). The standpipe system < + '?V`��`<F shall be Class III with National Standard 2-1/2 inch thread andr Iron Pipe 1-1/2 inch thread. It shall be noted that the supplyt,xktp4 for such standpipe system shall be sufficient to maintain a k I t residual pressure of sixty-five (65) pounds per square inch " t the topmost outlet of each standpipe with five hundred (500) 5 gallons per minute flowing. 6. Site access: The proposed building cannot be accessed from all Fl;°sul , t, sides by fire department apparatus. Inadequate attention to site `tfi details can place this building in an unnecessarily vulnerable position. If the building's fire defenses are compromised by x.`, 'd t �+ + ;g preventing adequate fire department access, the loss Ihould,be compensated by a more adequate system of internal building , protection: 7. The demolition contractor "shall file for a demolition permit with the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau. " 8. A system smoke detector shall be added to the parlor/libr'aikas�. per notes of Jos. Carroll on 4/1/88i i � 9. A rate of rise heat detector shall be added within sitz(6) feet of the entrance door to unit. 42,04, as per',notes of Jos+ CV I1% r . . 10 A rate of rise heat detector shall be added to toilet area .#203a + `� as per notes of Jos. Carroll on 4/1/88: 11i Fire extinguishers shall be located as required by 527 Code .ofi f, v Massachusetts Regulations 10.00 kf .10 � s .Y i , t i d n f Y ♦ SP ] t .. ..z.v $U ufu::Ay .t. e;•vT:I' f..., .. �' ,6 System smoke detectors shall be substituted for system heat „• detectors throughout the basement area as shown on ;basement drawings as per notes of Jos. Carroll on 9/1/88 nv,''- ` fl # +fix l •` '• It should be noted that this building was formerly used as a school'and currently protected by a complete system of automatic sprinklers. They" proposed use represents a change in existing use as defined by the i a Massachusetts State Building Code Section 105.0 and shall comply, with the provisions of Article 22 of the Code. Adequate life safety design for a building is often related only tory,.r, W compliance with the minimum requirements of local building regulations. a This may or may not provide sufficient occupant Y Y 1 p protection, depending Upon ,tfi�wt�•` sf �: , the particular building function and occupant activities. s ,,-,0�t!Vr Conscious incorporation of fire safety into buildings is too frequently' a� zi ;r given minimal attention by the designer, and building designers are > content, as are their clients, to meet tiie minimum safety standards of the y ni e3 ate building code. It is often incorrectly assumed that the codes provide :< completely adequate measures rather than the minimum. A r r'f� � Kf The approach to building design requires a familiarity with the reaction of people in fire emergencies. These reactions can differ widely y q Y9 Y•+; depending upon the physical and mental capabilities and conditions of I building occupants. Sufficient means of egress cannot provide adequate protection in occupancies where occupants are confined or are physically or;,mentally a !4. +r unable to escape without effective and immediate assistance. it the economic cost of fire safety is judged to be prohibitive, the occupanq,Y or ;, tfx `xahw, a�G 4 the structure should be changed or prohibited because there is no ";�z yJ =Te c d 3r justification for subjecting building occupants to an unreasonable level ,�1' k of peril from a fire. Iff Signed, y�+moi Robert W. TurnerilY„, Fite Marshals" ' y ' M `r- ar,T.YSA fi kY 'MI5✓ 'b J! 1 I cc: Chief Joseph Sullivan Y, Tkj Mr.,-Joseph Carroll r l P M > C Ms, Elaine Hart �` t'�•µyrf� .. r • t i � Lta, Y� I • �7 t i �if E� fi'k.F� � �4 r. e a A . pp� x r�LL�ted` k,y l q NV-4 s 1 �� ` r N Mr. MA 1 b • iR'♦ ,t. r. j`Fk'iggh � .dxa aa aa,�tAr. 'd 1 Aadh �6 WV*, b�i td 0 P3 CO n✓�' e1 , m � Ft4 _ _ � � _ 1 •d fr,t 11 -r � z-rr-��LC �d f. �* 6• �lY io r% . � ^ '—<i 7.iripm by M .']. sa�f' 0 ♦' ' C x -ivrA eo �'x• t4'�• '{ i T 'T! f�r y 4 ^n O cN 7N�• 'd#1yj4w j�; -`r.}, t . ` ' °y} � t •'iNtn t P1 ,x � � C--. J u r� i { txlf r ,L .q. 4ht �F1` i1q .} xf.,t rrAA �� f3Yn��'X�7�t�Y� r�i't"1 Y1C I C ^?oU �• � � C u �`��s��1nf4M t IeA�t K a<Fn. ��1 �' 11 Z. • �' � �s{"^r ,�yt� 11rr{H' a4:r�X ]NW � 1 g,p(3LI•$1y�A L 1 I� �IY � � t/� [� � *701 1{S } `t 11711' ,n/��21�1� �x. �ri�Vt; ? �� •. � i T� d'1id11��'lll b . o4' baa ry 1 yYL�r t�iF1�' kr . y$+"dNI}^,}lra # 't ?`u Sir n t4 F tr .. ..r. T I a {M l SIL': 'h � Y'+1 \ 'T `•�,t eJz.t r i 2 'q Evert FiixP 'I, �l >Ilip k` LTC ..�.", ; m•. . ,, TO BE MARKED: ', Audible Alarm CONTROL UNITS HEAVY`DUTY OfL`TIGHT 110,) t . ";.Nortnal ---Silence TYPE K-=2 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH Op9RATORS! �;i f` b, fLsOend • Salem FIre 'D Plate egartmeht Sllehce Alarm °t� ti L G Operator contact lock f x '��: i ; I Switch Urxnft I { i A '. .- �' >t '� COMPLETE s >` ! '' t•'j j I�al SQUARE Dv �iE'ia7 `.OR ';?-!'Ifl r .,r SELECTOR SWITCH q • t UNIT 907)1KS11K3 ja ` 11tr F a e;{ tv.6�/a1717sA. ,Y Via.:}:'Jit Ir 4.� •,e}/ Y�~5 � i I - 1 ,_1{l0'ttfr x-! 1 IN07E : Add ouble q ,l µ , Tr I the front enhyi� l {' w�JR°tipJ . 2 Position Selector Switch Oper.lore r Af, +{ yyrN l ( kl /6t-. Lea.Ke alit•and Contact Bioek Not I..I.d.d unfair.Not.e Application lltlllS7 q�x (., ,2 i � `t}i� Cams are field conveRlble.ISCliana"1 iiadi6o}�dul A� I—Contact Closed , Fw' CONTACT BLOCK REQUIRED I o—Contact open afc listed on Page 125 Poi,knob ddlor/endAt. F' types not listed order optratafd tthdul Ionoba ty plus sepafale knbb or dellited co of endf►Ytk.gne,y Droit ••Q Ane" In - uuul6ule'bil Page 9iskrI uN%iiiounllui�ll �Y.. .,Uon Type Position Left Ripht Left RIOhI OpefalOTS Can etontCid';l1tM¢alr] YS Yvx , �' + '_y•.. t-KA lt o o t j type by ordeiihi life seISArAIe�llild'M{idullei7Jrp' i nt ++*. a" 12 required ft6ni'Paid 3261 leelor Ic y 4t * ?.. y Fy •1 ; eootacl 0 0 o t t o operelors WW accept Uil til IfVBppiSFr%�e ' t lblocfk31nbunt An leRdcrn to rut, i'' °•�"•. n Lu f KA-t t (iI a + t o e t dP('our b16tk!(: n,N� b LOfJ1tYC -r]e 0 f1 i I �f ;y ^eJi�t, n,tv '$• k*ryN a`+ ij.. Nte o 0 0 1 1 0 , f HVC '"'(a c 1Nljy :. >3tF-� t„T•p'f/Isw. l Stand"ard CoNlael B16ake ;FR6� •, C{ •r,. "rt f�V, NpM-ILLUYI,N ATEO OPERATone CAM Type Type I Prke x '' 1 1 Srmdele x�` a Price ?BB,Z,n1, aH S YaIW.I RatYM '1 1 '� mal a R9 3,} AR R t , -oras only, � V•.� a_{eo @A•t llLt r u +`,.' ` � .c a1•�'• _SWtiir1,fiMn E KS-11 512.00 I i S \' . .'•t rFt f _JCS.1J 11.e0 •• •ate V?t + % �i',w 5/-• a Opera.d CoOc 1.or] E Kq.IIKO ..... ]0.00 n fa 3Y-. y.(:.1 5 K p'SnT Ja x tt;•. fin•}e ,'.WIU11-It/.I In Poe.I2 E KS-1IBHt] w '-t J 1k'nn/-KA-11n Pot 11 E S- 2266..65000 .'-Ir . 34,'A yWm2APoI1 2 E KS-11BH2 00.0 I spuing a•1Ym h.m Len E KS 25 .... 20.00 For OtherContact blOCka and dlugi r�' i Mt w r rr1 rtfi " Wehout Knob -•-•• .y Nay Operated Bleck o Knob E KS.250 22.90 see Page 771. V Nay Operalod(Code 2 Only) E K5 25K2 ... 46.10 t . paring R.fuln Nom Flight Common Legend Pfaloe�'rli ja u W4lhout Knob D KS 71 20.06 Starw.ad week Knob D Ks 740 22.60 A. 7YDe Vit„ r i Key 0p,,r.md(Code1 Only) D .... K57eK1 eG.60 [ y na { 1d $f k i - 1 t tr Jt AM`Ply 9 �+N M1y��*1 ILLUMINATED OPERATORS ' OPERA I With fopv.,60 Mr.: 0 1.50 Na. V e p5 Transformer TpLiht Module 9d rf CAM Typo Type arks I • t�"� ka•ga ^,{ a��43`. Manuel Return , (Black (Aluml *iiit }¢ry> 1 Y z+ as'FY+ Wnfund Knob E KAIJt 1:4.00 Field - Fiat 'lit t ttttt { �# i Su gerd R.dN role E KIIJIR 16.60 Msrklnas Nolod) NOUMesa EI Pried al +1}h7F t spring naum from L•n r `rt Without Knob E K 25Jt 52.00 plank KN-200 , ;KN-700x. '`7 SI tt�F Uvor SI.Mr,d Red Knob E K 251 5..60 'ik$ T r t^ y x Hand-Avlo KN.210 KN=710r� J ix' - tttSx• DnPt gn alga -N W;lnour Knob D . .. K71J1 6200 Off On KN-244 N244 r 35+.a 1 ee4LV4 n 5. an fin 011 ,. KN-21St 5KN 71Std:'s r'Ma ,',t'*, - -- ---- , - - — '----1 1 Ll -,.er 1� oli i 1 P elrlti+ f Irl t;�i�;at��L�1c Rc �.XEY wITNOR_AWAL CODE:For 2 P.,Illon Swlich•e. ) Aui0.011 Hlnd KN-259 [KN+75B 5nrlgf�a "•, Fpr-OII Rcv I KN-259 I 'KN459 I}6 TAIS"f+ ',I �>�^ Cod. ` J Ceea \ J Coe• ^ �. Hand-Oil-Auto KN-260 I{ IIKN 7601K A:J1, , ¢L 1 . Yea No 2 No Tes ] Yee Yes Man-Ofl•Auto KN-262 d�KNa702 lm. k$ HIP-Olf-Lew KN-277 K141777 + NOTE: - For olhor legend plates—s6e Page 330 NI key operated selector switches era furnished es standard with Square D number E10 hay chengos.See P.ge 725 ler Met kay chargos. lel—�I_ • a tl �.rY n ¢iilNrt �i xYPo'yyiyru} `s bf }'}. If, p ' i eda00. atiu Specification Sheet for Salem Fire Department Approved ; Sileneei,,' lel ; Switch. Key- E-10is the key supplied with ' switchi One 'Ke� may b2agPl retained b the Y khxt electrician of record. Spare keys sire to, bt3;r g iven: to Salem Fire .Prevention Bureau. NO KEYS - are to be )left an `r�ahel, Note legend plate information. Notice: Trouble buzzer mus,tlbe plat d �In; front entry area, and approved for audibility.' L ;1 { Use this 'switch on all new installations( or any tittle a panel is up7,"x + dated. Firefighters will not be permitted to enter„ panel, rnor'iw 11 s� , t they reset the system. i 1 , 1 +. + , I fits'f y""+� 41 Silence Alarm` Switch a, Form /f122 (9/81 ) (OVER) Salem Fire Deptaipx+�y , 8 � # SA LEM` FIRE DEPT♦. SILEtJCE ALARA SWITCH UIJIT. Audlble Alalm,, J CONTROL,. 14.1UNITSHEAVY HEAVY DUTY OILTI�HT I IJORNAL. „ S,IL�NCE 1 . I :-I'' : •t : . .E-c TYPE K E(iE ND1 PLATES 5'pcdel Legend Plates— KN-A, KN=f, kN s,KN�91 1 `,t srr Salem Fire Dept. TYPEKN-400ubld HeedOd -a. p TYPE KN-S Can be vied with All Tire I1((Y enelel "a 41 �+ SILENCE ALARM SWITCH (Fel ufewio rules but men be m1- 4 If "a r!tLUSe Ke}F .E-IO vel Action KRn • tally when used with KY•2" ! dr 4 '-'Ju'Use IODeralore KR6, Sle'nderd Legend lalee'-KN-1;KN-2, KpL and.Kp07) a '{ KH-7,KH-7 and KN-8 Standard M.,klnu9 KN=100 r e.i.r814nk1 I+Y"w. C6d, tree Tyne -- I ' tlandnl Oreen pad TYPt kN-t�Jlt/e Larp(�, }I !Y "feelete 2 septan •• 4 fx'tvnn �' Far KYAF of Senior Men anal A, only. Unlns NONd KN Blank Blank minimum spacing between AD Alen �yq6��gqggqq KN 0o Blan Slap mud be 2%. varl. ,2A, sellers ally, pj rK,minum 1 a - peAaryg KN 502 On 011 Type Sundlyd Maikln2l ' 01 �+ 1.1..7.1 )) An Black m.rk KN-000 Blank Bb c4 Fitld KN-0Blue lieid -'� KN-520 Blank Blank i kN-100 KN30p kx700 - KN 700 KN-800 KN-521 Slarl Step 'TYPE KN-0(For pts wllA KN 522 On OffWU it opeHlole) tY '� •. FOR PUSH BUTTON On PILOT LIGHT KN 5.1 Forward Rovaree Typo Slanderd MelMngs - KN-SN Un Down Or I. 9x-100 K&200 KH-300tOOR00 KN 81 KN-525 High Low ! 1 BbnA-Red KN400R KN30OR KH 30UKN 8000 KN-526 Open Close KN-900 I Blank it. Sud KII.101 IN 201 RN-701OI KN 801S1o0-Red KN-102 KN302 KI4-302g2 KN egg On kN403 KN303 KNJOJ 3 KN 803 PrICIng Intar2natlan „ .011-Red Kis KN30/ KNJ01 - KN.804CAR 5100 a9nnd T Oe I - Pdae.•.-Red RN-IOS KN3b5 KN405705 KR-SOS Plate ,. ,Forwvd Kel 106 KN306 KN.70706 KN 806 Standard Markings T.ble 1,Le y, {! 13y 'a „ r2. c1qReverse KH-101 KN307 RN40707 KN 807TeblaH Lea }• 7 KN-1 Aluminem Field KN 199 Close' KN40 KN408 KN40089 KN 008 $ tal Mallin 1 C ”Open RN109 k11309 KN70709K1809 Oown KN-110 KN310 KN 717 9&BIO (Specify Marking pod Fkld98 "If KN-111 KN311 KN 71711 k&811 Required) Seled lrgm'i,1` 129 r y, Fn1 KIL112 KN312 IN 312 AN 712 AN 812 Standard Markings 'e Slow KH-113 KH 213 KN 313 AN 717 AN 813 .Lble INpn if 114 AN 214 KH-314 Ky 714 KN 81/ KN 2 - "I u•�dj •r"Z. Low KN 115 KO-215 NIt3R AN 715 KN 815 (SDodlll Marking Black Field KN-2991 Inch A 116 AN 216 KH 316 KH I KH 016 y V ped Field KN•299R - In KH KN 217 Kit 317 KN 717 KN 811 Required) _ select bOm 120 n C X J0q sit lie KIT 210 KN 315 .IN 718 KH-819 ; I K 1 119 KN 819 Standard Markings Table at Left Jog?Dr. KIT 119 .AN 219 KH 319 �'. JAI.Rev. KN420 KN320 WN 320 KN-02p KN B20 KN-7 Special Marks ng •Ltb-Nu13EIB 'KH-099 t 'i Lower KN-121 KN 321 KH-321 ktb121 KIh B21 (Specify Marking — „,.1.20"1 ... `.• +, Oul NN 122 KN 222 KN422 KII.722 Kit Required) He Ield — f-3998 Reser KII-123 AN 273 KN 323 KN 123 AN 823 Bla_ Y. Run KN 124 Kk 224 9x421 KN-724 KII B21 KII_/ A.y - _ --- KN-499 S1 Jog 911125 KN 225 KII 315 t!725 KN 025 Any IA ar Li nV(Snecily Mar4a5}I) _—_ y§ < 117.715 KN 825 - $nndaN MarFings• -- Select I'D ts1120 .1 1 ', fr KN125 I.t!226 Me:25 -- Tabic lbeV1 Rase KN 127 AN227KN 727 911727 are 027 Otanie KN 128 101-220 AN 728KN 728 KII628 Inulast KN 129 KII 229 KN 379 AN 729 AN 829 KH-5 $OeCial ,A",no - -flack Fald N 5991 , r r tell KN- 30 911230 KNJ]p kN 1Jg ON 070 (Specify Marking --Organ Red r I 610 Fpl 111171 1n7?I KN 311 14?31 KN-831 Roquired) Find KN519 o+ I F1CIt Sln,l lure KII232 X11]3% B]7 __-_ - l vn, $ I<[U ila.l a• 1' u0?t AN fl]] -Plink Hu hFI Irl KN 400 el 11 na 4 ,l Cycle SIOD KN lit kN 2Ji AN-]31 KN IJ4 AN BJ4 NVd f uIJ n ` Teed Slob 911 135 KN 235 All 335 AN 735 KN 175 KN-g An arkm JJIu ,. K Par.,Ron KN-1136 Kit 73G AN 736 AN 736 K14 836 Y, P c MO.,Slop RN-137 AN 231 KH 337 KII 737 KH 8031 �Sg1LtY-MaLFUNg) 1Selocl(ram < 1.20 r.a r Paw,,On KN 138 KII AN 338 AN 738 Kit 838 Slanderd Marking, Table el Left. 'et PoII Speed 911.117 AN 272 AN 37? All 772 914 072 i Law Seed KII H7 RN 273 Kit 373 Ku-773 KN 813 KN-T special Markiog A1v1nf.11`.Fteld1 (1%Nj09...r 7 620 11 Second Speed KN 114 KII 274 KN 374 KN 174 KN.874 ($p aeily MalkinV "- mire Speed IN:US KN375 NN 375 Y.W775 KN.875 Re lured pod Field KN-7991. t 2 ,le — (— pulltoSlarl KWI79 ❑3479 K11179 $Inndald ldmkinxs Saiecl 1101 Fe1p to Slop KN-e Table a1 Left 1 `. (For use -?<t1.1 glue Fluid KN 999 Car; 11 g�f 1 i Fon SELECTOR SWITCH On with Sortal Ida, _—� R 2dNae SELECTOR PUSH BUTTON KYC (SI oc ly Ma 1: g q d Field KN 8991 t x' T----1 .. .n I Fnrinswo! (R I red) - KNMIO .,- I r ..rev KI le- I •. • j 4_ nn 1 yN.fl<p ., 1 IJ K14 JYJ 9'•1If.gJ! +, I I HN-a 'I - ru - r Bar Y,nor ke ti pe-low KII-141 era 1 Mb)<s Jog Run KN142 Y.1 212 K11JQ KH 742 KuBU dV[µY'9M' 1.14n,Avlp. KII IdJ K14343 KH443 NN 743 K&BO Maximum Number of Lincs and Chard0letf , ,,tA. K11-144143 Kit 24a KN NI KN-714 KN 844 for Type KN Legend Plates - y On Oil AN 145 fill 245 Kit 745 KN-745 KN-BIS _. KN-1 KIF2 kN] KN 1 KN-5 KN.6 KN.1 RN 11 RK-2' Open Close KNIIfi KU 246 KN 346 KH 746 kNB/6 IYDe. ....... t e^ Raise Lower KN 141 AN 241 IN 7/7 KN-747 KN 017 nun-Jog K14 148 KN34B KN440 KN 748 KN B48 Ma.No.01 CAN. Sale Rvn Nn 149 I N 249 AN 349 IN 749 KN 849 per Line ......... aper fine ti 16 22i /l per boa '`•' SlowFastKit 150 Kit 250 IN 350 KH 750 KN 850 Alu,No.of lines 4 2 ] 1 2 pa field 1 1 T ., suet-SIoo KII-151 K&251 KN-351 AN 751 KN-051 dnd sell , Bp.Onwn IN 153 a"253 KN-753 AN 15r KN-B5J The maximum n0mher 01 characlera and linos It— above is a pnclical inedmOm Low Nigh KI4.154 KN 254 KN 351 Kit 754 KN 654 based on a minimum Sita OI characlera to hclhple easy readln9• ohen lower chd¢0Yt �1 J. LAwAfislop-sta.l AN 155 KN 255 kNJSy KN-755 - KH ass than if,. maelmum are required the fine 01 the ChafAEl-IS era changed to permit Ihd aur+1l}.3 Left Right AN 156 911356 KN-356 KN 756 KN'856 readability. hr" " On Auto KN 176 KH 275 KN4/6 An 776 KN B76 Approalmete Dimensions p I)a :1"4 .p Sammel-Wlmel KI4.157 Kit 251' Kit 357 - FN 357 AN 657 —1` I} 7 `- Auto ON':too KN 158 Kt1-256 KN 758 1`4_ 58 KN-858 Type A 0 B For.Olt Rev. R015g 11459 AN KII. so KII.859 _r IUnd-Oil-Auto KII.160 911 260 KII-2160 K14 0 RN:B61 KN-2 s'/s7 }•.•••, Jog Sat, Ron KN-161 KN461. K114G1 kN 76, kN 861 KN-7 Ys,(,. IjS_ L. 1 '` F 1L1t Alan.Bit Auto KN.162 IN 362 KN462 KN 62 KN 862 KN 5 n'A7 14 - f RDCO.OII Close - KII-163 KN-263 KN-: KGd63 KN 867 Isla P� 1' a Type KK Ug oft Down KIAI64 K113fi4 Kra 364 It". 64 K4.064 Krl tow 011-I110h KNAG5 KII 265 AN 365 RN-765 tor.Sole At,. KN-166 IN 266 KII-]66' KN-166 are 866 •mo 7 ,a ! J09 Stop Run KN I6) K"267 KN461 KN-161 AN 967 line _-.- 4 er eJ . Type KN / Slow oil-tali KN-I G/ KN 268 KN46B KN 7168 Kn 668 +'? I I p Itj'11+ Summer OIL , winter KI. 169 Kel269 _ KN.3G9 K11769 'KN 869 3 t High low-011 KII 110 KN370 KY 37p IN)10 K"Sao I a•e4d w I 1 \ 1. Ile T P l Parse Be Lower K11171 %it 211 AN 711 131411 Kel 871 High-ON-Lo. KI1 177 kN41) KN 371 KN I?? KN at? l I w t. i.^� I t a Aele4lan•011 KH-1)d Kit 276 KII-7/6 KN 171 AN ere '•,y, 1 I. '"i !} I••,� ,.typ+ vaj�Y',�,• 1 i ' lip. KN-7 TY00 KN.t 33 DIB DISCOUNT .s SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED Form #122 ( 9/81 ) 1,111 AI AOM C1.11 TrN c�2xhY�g.l E 5 s4FtcI a - W OPO U M � h LOCUS tif,�P S72° PA2 C£ G Q clTy of SALEM SCALE: /.,:: eOOO' NI PLAN R£FE/2E,UCF- EHSft/£/jT r 9.65 s7=0G�- SZ�ah o PX/S „PLAAI F G D 3.93 gO.O��I IG.IZ `� 9CC£ss 0 ,9A) l G NSA EM PROPE27✓ __� X/ST/UG �f/S£ y£U/- 39.32 ZL30 a '•, 5.95 - ACCESS �r Of CITY Of SflGEMfIG , SCE �l�=20; FHS o HPQIG 1, 1986, ESSEX SU2o UE Isa4eE zi o S�z4Vy ltic., /8/ ESSEX sr2eEr SALEr1,MAs5.' NEw s72°/B 4/�,"', FILED Ar fSS£X SOUrll 2E6/SUV Of PARCEL C EHsEhfUT A/Z8°gZ38 DEEDS _1N PLA,U BOOK 209, PUMA/ 31 . PHILIP S. SiNGG£TotJ w PH2CEL 19 � 3 I I _J 89. 19 .A157°39' 25"E B� DSD15TfiEET PL,41V OF LdN / CE2r/Fy 7W;> 7N15 PGAA/ CON,- /OIF 4s ro 7eWc 20665 1/A1,0 2£6 UGA>/0,us 266/5reRS Of lJE6'DS. 54YA A Foe 2FG/s7/?y use. ou,�y PPpR'£,fTY 0F / CERrifV 7-11,4)- 7-119- PR01oE',e2-V L/iU,rS S<OWA) (� // A/ 10M q2f>!/E Ciufs of srluG f5 ". I OY5 S//o!!/PS, �AL�/ l / ! VSI/V� / /V/ I/ `�/�y ANO 7�/E L/AJES Of sr2Ee>s AA/D ways SNoc%v A/1E r/-/OS£ Of PUB1,/C O2 102/1147-e 57RE67S oR U/Ays A .READY L5V ee'/S1/E.0, AND A/O AMM ZINE5 f02 D/u/S/OAl of EXisriuG 06VA/E251-//10S oe Foe SIALE. /"` eo, MAY 9,1989 ',VELI G�RYSA2E s VwlA/ F 9/ SECT/OA/91X Mgs�c i ROBERT yGn � B. o io 20 �.a � 40 uo NO2TH 5NO2E SUR VE y CORP �f�9jOk� LANNS 18/ ES5EX Sr2EE7' � SALEM, MASS 436 -�'�2L7/�c� lam/ �:• — I *,G0.\DIT fo I� Qu of �Am, fflas,5ar4usdfs �'-��' �tt1et#ricttl �e�ar#meat Jnl�tg J.(�ittra�i • illirr �Jns}�rrfnr 44 TGafaneffe fit_ aI¢m, ,.Matta- 01970 .Area (gate 617 745-6300 August 21 , 1989 Mr . Stephen Levangie Levangie Electric Company , Inc . 978 Washington Street Weymouth , Massachusetts 02189 Re : 3 Broad Street Dear Mr. Levangie : Please be advised , I cannot give you final approval because of a problem that exists in the kitchen area of the dwelling units . Th.e requirements of the National and 1987 Massachusetts Electrical Code , which states "Countertop receptacle outlets installed in the kit- chen shall be supplied by not less than two small appliance branch cir- cuits " . The article I am referring to is Article 220-4B-2 . My inter- pretation of this article would say that you shall have a minimum of two small appliance branch circuits available at the main countertop . fours truly , G� John J . Giardi Wire Inspector cc ; Elayne M . Hart , Exec . Dir . Housing •Authority William Munroe , Building Inspector Robert Turner , Fire Prevention C') m Letter hand delivered 8-21-89 C) !V JJG/m Hn v mr m �om CO o x m to y ti 00 c.o STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS OneAshburton Place — Room 1301 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 =a � (617) 727-3200 CM CODE REVISION PROPOSAL FORM .O:- (please :(please type or print) DATE: March 13 1987 77- 5-87-1 Building Code Section No. 201.3 General Definitions Code. Change No. Proponent (NAME) Executive Office of Camnmities and Development (ADDRESS) 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts (Please check type of amendment proposed.) Change Section as follows: Delete Section and substitute as follows: X Add new Section as follows: Delete Section — no substitute. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT: Add definition for Congregate� Dwelling Unit (See Attached) " i SUPPORTING STATEMENT(S): The intentionof this amendment is to place in the Code a definition of a Congregate Dwelling Unit and define the applicable use group classification. <;. v BOARD OF BUILDING p= . x ' I i i J. i Dwelling Unit, Congregate: A building or portion thereof, owned by a municipal authority or an agency or department of the Commonwealth, housing no more than six not necessarily related residents all over the age of 55, with separate sleeping accommodations for each resident and in which living spaces, cooking and sanitary facilities -:' are shared outside the sleeping accommodation, shall be considered a single a` dwelling unit. where individual residents' rooms contain a sink, refrigerator and cook-top, and residents have individual or shared sanitary facilities, each individual resident room shall be considered a dwelling unit. For purposes of the State Building Code, Congregate Dwelling Units shall be ,I considered multi-family dwellings (R2) when not designed as attached or I% detached one- or two-family dwellings (R3) or (R4) . Congregate housing shall ii not be considered as a boarding, lodging, dormitory, hotel, motel or i institutional use. I t ;i Nn ', i a 3 1 II H' rj III L� } 1' Speed Message To `.��//G From Subject ��ALE/�'/ ff�'us(Nci to��l� Cay4he ctA7E /fou_5 NL_4 ( , v � Date ��.C(i�Siati -�-0/�95� �P'�s2IM (I (.vr7F/ � (N/�e/2✓r-P/,A/you fes- if 4 0, // <oiv e 7� m us(/VC Ll o < w/ Z e (,-Oa e S oce ( C V Lr N J "(woo u mss (57161V<-e .rW ,E2.ee 4 c4J-1/o61 dYr ('s Ai Ps 7 41e25 Signed WilsonJones 86 GRAYLINE FORM oaA00 2-PART VID83•PRINTED IN US A. CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS ANTHONY V.SALVO MAYOR January 29, 1988 Elayne Hart, Executive Director Salem Housing Authority 27 Charter Street Salem, .Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Hart: This is to advise you that I have authorized the following departments to waive the necessary fees relative to the development of 35 units of elderly housing at Bridge-ano.Ash-Street (667) and 16 units of elderly congregate housing att3—BBmad_Street_(667) : 1 . Building Permit Fees 2. Electrical Permit Fees 3. Public Property Fees for Water & Sewer Connections and Inspection 4. Fire Department Fees as Required 5. Plumbing and Gas inspector Fees In addition, I have requeste.; our Zoning Enforcement Officer, William Munroe seek a waiver from the Board of Appeal. Very truly yours, , Anthony V. Salvo Mayor AVS/smc cc: W. Munroe P. Tuttle Capt. Turner - r r THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 20 March 1989 Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ¢ a1 ATTN: Mr. Steven Santry rn-< RE73'Broad Street, STI—em_Elderly_Housing , Mi igp � M Stair No.1� - Co Gentlemen: 4 In accordance with our phone discussion today on the subject matter, please see the enclosed drawing ASK-5, dated 20 March '89. This shows the enclosure of the stair at the second floor with 1 hour partitioning and the Label door relocated at the stair with magnetic hold open which will be deactivated on alarm. It is our understanding that this will be acceptable in lieu of the sprinkler solution sent you in drawings ASK-5 & 6 of 21 Feb. '89. If you have further questions please call. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator. encl. cc: R. Sabin Reggie Peters Rene C. Lamerre File — pl W -- I — � iz LI - -vltc , w N \ w j ! , 7£ dl I 1 0 az � � �AErAO% �.en1 Ery .4Gve►tiG JOBNO.A50/3A GG�/ DRAWN CHECK 2A fwv_ gEvie1041�) SCALE z DATE .f SHEET NO. BUILDING DEPT THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 HA?i 3 8 37 AH X89 2 March 1989 RECEIVED CITY OF SALEM,MASS. Mr. Stephen W. Santry Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Salem Housing, 3 Broad Street Dear Mr. Santry, We reply to your letter of 22 February on the subject project and discussion of it at your office 27 February . The action of the sprinklers at the grade floor protection was explained in our letter of yesterday on the Bridge Street project and will be the same at Broad Street. Regarding your interpretation of dwelling unit separation, we find code references which we believe take precedence over a concept of the complete perimeter of the dwelling unit being "dwelling unit separation." 1. If the intent of item7, "Dwelling unit separations" in Table 214, was to include all partitions surrounding a dwelling unit the Code would state "dwelling unit enclosures,"as in item 4 ".....enclosure of exitways, exitway hallways and stairways." 2. If all four walls are part of a one hour separation then the exterior wall windows would require opening protectives. Section 914.1 however exempts use group R-2 from this requirement. 3. With respect to the corridors, enclosure is emphasised in Section 610.4, "Enclosures: All corridors serving as exitway access shall be enclosed in fire separation walls having a fire resistance of at least one (1) hour when serving an occupancy load greater than thirty (30)". By Note j in Table 214, access corridors serving less than thirty are exempted from a one hour rating. From these items the Code seems consistant in considering exterior walls for certain requirements and exemptions and similarily corridor walls for certain requirements and exemptions, and that dwelling unit separations are yet another element considered independently of the exterior enclosure or corridor enclosures. We respectfully request your consideration of the intent of the Code that dwelling unit separations refer to the separation of one dwelling unit from another dwelling unit and not the enclosure of a dwelling unit from all other spaces. page 2 Mr. Santry, 2 March 1989 Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. <T� S L4'-� Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator cc: Richard Sabin TAC Steve Zisson SHA Ed Paquin Lamarre Const. e I yy I I i is I + 22 t F.A I •{ Imo _ z tS, � l •'�� "1...rrr r -- THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 21 February 1989 Mr. Steve Santry j m Salem Building Department �� F One Salem Green n o Salem, MA 01970 °O z m� �' n 2m w o Re: 3'Broad Street, Salem Elderly Housing no g Proposed_treatment.of,Stair#1— N m Dear Mr. Santry, Further to our last discussion we enclose sketches ASK 5 & 6 illustrating sprinkler isolation of the subject stair well based on Article 437, "Open Wells", of the Mass. Building Code. We note that Section 437.1 states "Open wells ...shall be permitted in all buildings other than use group H. 437.1.2 The open well spaces may be used for any approved use when the individual space is provided with an approved fire suppression system. 437.1.3.1 An atrium (open well) connecting not more than three levels may contain an exitway as permitted by 616.10. 616.10 ...may be permitted without enclosure or protection between such areas provided all conditions described below are met: 1. the lowest level ...is a street floor. 2. the entire area...is sufficiently open to be assumed that a fire...in any part will be immediately obvious.. 3. egress capacity is simultaneously sufficient for all occupants of all levels... 4. each floor level...has at least 1/2 of its required egress capacity provided by an exitway leading out of that area without being exposed to the spread of fire or smoke therefrom. 437.3.1 An appropriate draft stop shall be installed at each story of the floor opening. Automatic sprinklers shall be provided around the perimeter of the opening... The distance between sprinklers shall not exceed six feet center to center. I would like to discuss this with you next Friday, Feb. 24 at 1 :00 P.M. In the meantime if you have questions please call. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Roger Sheppard encls. II a i o � •j • �� IA DW dry iallt7EftSIhE OF y��4 ExPO�E.p STA1k '' � 1K m . D¢dPPEt) -So FFf7P'7=4n-(➢ads O V -_ T m t- STAI R 1 AT = RST Fy&U . ar 00 rn n "c w '� ---- c,� , co G&NfKAED A�(E S'�P- —a fill lam AlJBWW �a�2113kCE2-"� 4u. • _ �DQOQPBD_�f'RT07�GG° (DRAI-T ?'TDP — - 2 S AIR ' nT JOB NO. 13-x! B�� ^ WA 0% Q ALEM l-Y SSG DRAWN >L\ STdI Q. 1 , MOP)F (6AT1®N g CHECK SCALE DATE,71 Fgegq SHEET NO. 1 n rn co O:c-, G 2.n CO Z am w p n 3e ND ��.• in p � co w. w i - S If tom. �v�G7`IO�M � L�DIGIA9l.� ,�Qy'k tA1 N( EIDE y 1641 W440 6T JOB NoSOl - ^ DRAWNTAC �fQ 1 Nim'DI�ICQT1�Nh t 924PC;16 9 f7) SCALE = J DATE 11 FSPA A SHEET NO. 3 .l O SPRlaecr-P- 1+6aDS • DW GH iaNbERSit7S OF ' �� ' F,C PDQ D STAt k DecPPEn SO FFIT P�=4" (9u�`r STOt�) � rn S?"AI R 1 AY F RST F OD Q m " rn< F � Min F p 3I_) ° (o TKEAPS6, 10 g--011 n� I ,K aPQ(A1KtE2=HEA Su. sow ---=}DQD.QQBV �E'FR'07�" (DRAFT STLP) �-- 2 S AR 1 nr TAC1 v n JOB NO. LA �*L� "f � � �WbU 7�r DRAWN A6 57d1 Z e I , /0\01 F IGA11 CA,) CHECK (PROPOSED) SCALE DATE91 F&69q SHEET NO. -, �m r- _-- co co o a m ND FL. n � r„ co � w -5EG7'lim) L Drry ISG WCLTR `a4LE>tit 1�.DEQLY N�4:► PJQA4i� S(' JOB Noll -,A A✓t^�' DRAWN TACiR � Mmi�t�IGA'r1QN'� CHECK �P1zQ?odal°19) SCALE DATE II SHEET NO. l�fJ,r,IV6 r /`�� lf� .lTl •�c�lElll� C'��TS5t1CI�Li5E�t5 aIem Green Cryo (@ue s�,Ego qss FORM A - DECISION - i I Ms. Josephine Fusco City Clerk City Hall Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Fusco: At a regularly scheduled meeting of t::e Sale Planning Board held on April 3, 1986 it was voted to endorse "Approval Under Sub- division Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant: City of Salem 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 2. Location and Description - Southeast corner of Broad and Summer Streets. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. Sincerely, Walter Power III Chairman WP/sm of $alem, lHttssadjusetts cog Pall �alem, ilasaacilumette 01970 Am 3 3 29 FM '86 FILE# NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO CITY Ul C'K Sr t FM.MASS. FORM "A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: --April 3, 1986 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ___zhe_so_ the�Sorner_of---—_____ Broad_and Summer Streets5; — — ----------------------------- in d �- '—------1----------- (insert sheet and street numbers here) 7 Signature of Owner ----- -l- v-=----------- - — - -------------------- Street Address _______33__Washington_Htf Pr City/rown&State_-Salem, MA. 01970 Telephone Number 7-4-4---4-5-80--------------------------------------------- ------------------------ �tt 1 of 'SaPIn, Aussadjusetts oSaleac,,ffi[assaotry.ett.D19ta FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL APR 3 3 29 PM '86 In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, t4ILE# applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of subCITY Cl."P!. S^!.:H.MAS S. mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem,Mass., -------- Apri 1--3-----------19 — 86 — To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ----it--is—a—division_ of_a_tract of land on which two —______________ or more buildings were standing when the subdivision control law went into effect, into separate lots, on each of which one such building ------- ------------------------------- ------- -------- --- remains standing ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner -------City of Salem ------------------------------------------------------ —-----------— Address --------93 Washington Street, Salem------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor __Essex Survey__Service _______ Address ----------------------l95_Essex_Street.--Salem----------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ......Essex_South --------------------Registry Book --------------- Page ---------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _ - _-__--southeast_-corner—of_Broad--and---------Summer------------------- s ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- -----—--------------------------------------------—------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ----------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- i ------------------------------------------------------------ ,3- --- ------------------- - - ----- - -- - - - ------------ t 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on th 1 e er th the aures of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner— — --- -------- -------- ------------------------ ---- Address---93_Washingtgn__Stre -- ------------------------------------------- 744-4580 i Telephone Number ---_----------- ------ -- r CaR.GIAIG JA�1£S DA RPPRovAL uNoER rf/£ SUBoiyisiov CAMRRA CO,UTROL zt9eo No7 R oU/R£O S82°2/98'414 J9y�s lyE'frGfl,? /D8.37 .UDE;P.f' AL.OF fl�E/y P ,U 0611s yA�o,��s o _- sBr°S3bi'w rE�trEA �; FRfLvCrS aa�; AV JUS£ VN r s _ 06le c£TTf FRT F,Coe (fr` ` 1s{ 'tet.. £ PNTR/C F� 29/. r6 0.09 J ` g55 Loco 1 Ba° a o c �A P)MCEL 8 .� DCR�S o n o (RIBS) INCLUDES C6r`1c e RA10 SERV/OR CE � BDe LOCUS y sn4ZE: w 1 2 ° S 72618'5/'6- Jill A S 7P /8 S/ Gd _' 139.28 ' 7. 39 '� `• //9.90 E ��j NEu_7 62. v ,o ti/ ti O CC E5 5 ARSE 9 2 94 to ti ( .3N 3 N933ro-6 E — 1 1• ' R1.55 9.0 ° 2?OS ` 340'34C L739 NG3$ 7 2'/850 40.00 /28.35 CH//IIEY -r0 r T RIwo lEp , ." y5 FccESSf53q3 0 : /7/55 S 7 572 18',51"10 60' S/ 6u SFAVOR COW w u N a 1 a 3'• 35 � N SIR p o )DMI NNS rRRr1o.V BU/L,D/A/G o ? Mme` h PRBC£t 0 v; l9R£R= /6,689 ' S.F a IASL I�11N� � 1 p9.4 a iL00Q 'OLIVER SCHOo[ 1 , 0 3`1 LOS 'r PU$L SIRS r PA/tc£t A 5' SjE Psi -- C 70 66 �� 11 b',PEH=/O,OOCo ! S.F. ' ti Rviov ) tin ,� I FIRE ESCAPE �k PDX O LAD Fzo t 6q.19SECOUD G, ,�g9 Z5 • E I/V 'I 34.49 �N5 5AZ Em R=/Sao FOR RE,61s Y us£ oa�y 53.37 L= 25.95 PROPERTY of --- ��640p4C17/ OF 3192 641 N7i°5649 £ SCAt6 : 1' = 20` RPR/G /, 1986 . OaD )R o ,0 20 ro bo i CERT/FY rN,gT rrrrS r'r, N CO.V1`0R11s Q ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE, INC. To 7-vc RULES AW4 REGULAr/ONS OF ZVE \ ra> Ess EX SrkFe-7 SjzF y, MAss: RFG/ST�'2S of pE�G1s, ' � ' l /08 77 - - - --- ;f.. I I ', � i I �'� �. . I I�I � i ' �� '. 'I I I �7 I I I '., , j —T— -__.-,•___.�_.—.-_ .. JOB STATUS REPORT Salem Elderly Housing, 667-7A,,Broad Street Project No. 85013-A Oliver School Report Date 2/10/89 Project Mgr Richard Sabin Demolition 99% Roofing Site Excavation 95% Sash/Glazing Plumbing 35% Foundation 95% Partitions 40% HVAC 25% Frame 95% Doors/Frames Electric 25% Exterior Walls 85% Finishes Fire Protection 15% Floors/Roof 85% Specialities Comments; Partition studding nearing completion. HVAC, plumber and electrician continue work. � mm r— nis — ca •• � 3[.n` .f.11 Distribution Building Department m R. Sabin TAC y' R. Peters TAC File Signed- :.!+�� ..�jl .......................................................................................... Roger Sheppard THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC . 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE , MASS . THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 14 February 1989 rn ID -1 pj O Mr. Steve Santryo, Salem Building Department ym O City of Salem rn T One Salem Green g` o � Salem, MA 01970 a� -0 .3 Cin _� D RE; Salem=Housing, Broad Street y `a "' Dear Mr. Santry, We reply to some questions raised with the contractor during your recent walk through of the project and per our discussion today. Our interpretation of the Mass. Building Code requirements applicable to this alteration are as follows; 1. The occupancy / use is R-2, residential multi-family. 2. The building construction is Type 3C,. (Exterior masonry walls, ordinary joisted, unprotected.) 3. The area of the building (within enclosing walls) is 3,470 sq. ft. 4. Table 305 indicates 9,600 sq. ft. allowable for a two-story building of this construction type and occupancy use. 5. Fire resistance ratings are indicated in Table 214 and its footnotes as follows: Exterior bearing walls - 2 hrs. Fire enclosure of exitways, stairways (Note f) - 1 hr. Exitway access corridors (Note j) - 0 hrs. Vertical separation of tenant spaces - 0 hrs. Dwelling unit separations - 1 hr. Other non-bearing partitions - 0 hrs. Interior bearing walls, columns, girders, etc. - 0 hrs. Floor construction including beams - 0 hrs. Roof construction - 0 hrs. Note; Section 905.7, Grade Floor Protection, requires that in this non-fireproof construction, at the basement the floor-ceiling assemblies and supports below the grade floor shall be protected by one of the following methods: 1 . fireresistance rating of not less than one (1) hour, or 2. heavy mill (Type 3A) construction, or 3. automatic fire suppression system. Automatic sprinklers are being provided at the basement as the selected method. r page two Steve Santry, 14 Feb. 1989 From the above references we believe the contractor's concerns are answered as follows; 1. The dutch doors as entries to each apartment need have no rating as they occur in access corridor partitions which have 0 hrs. rating. 2. Similarly the wood frames for these doors need have no rating. 3. Similarly borrow lights in these partitions need have no rating. The open stair well #1 by the elevator has no smoke wall at the top of the stair. As you and I discussed, I shall forward further information on this to you for your review. I am informing the contractor of these matters by copy of this letter. Should you have further concerns on any of these items please call. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. g L� Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator. cc: Ed Paquin Lamarre Construction Al Ring EOCD Steve Zisson Salem Housing Authority Richard Sabin TAC Reggie Peters TAC Citp of 6atem, Aaggacbm5etto Public Propertp )Department 9�C�MIN¢ jguilbing Mepartment One 6alem green 745-9595 (Qxt. 360 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer October 17, 1988 Mr. J. Carroll T.A.0 Inc. 46 Brattle Street Cambridge, MA. 02138 RE: 3SBr ad^St'��Sa_1 m. MA-. 235 Bridge St., Salem,MA. Dear Joe, As you are aware, both of the above referenced projects are under Chapter 127, construction control. Construction control requires bi-weekly reports which we have not received. We also have not received certified plot plans of each project showing any increase in foot print and dimensions of set backs. There are some other documents that you owe to this department as we discussed the last time we talked. Please bring these reports and plans up to date before October 31 , 1988. j Regards, /l--4 Stephen W. Santry 7 Assistant Building Inspector SWS/eaf r cowirl4p . i x itll of �Jc`I�Elli, r. �d55eICI11I5Ef5 3 wl ,�, L��,p'� , ire �lcynrf mcnf �i l':I l�q un rtrra 18 �nfanetle T beet Joseph F. Sullivan aiem, fla. 011170 Chiel C-, p C) March 2, 1988 '. City of Salem " Mr. William H. Munroe, x. Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green � ,p Salem, Ma 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: I have reviewed the plans.and specifications for the proposed congregate housing at .1#3 Broad_Street.as submitted by Mr. Joseph Carroll for the Architects Collaborative.—I- have failed to approve these plans based upon the following criteria: 1. The proposed use of the building is "Congregate Housing", classified as a "Residential Board and Care Occupancy" by N.F.P.A. 101 Life Safety Code. 2. The anticipated occupancy of this building is comprised of elderly residents incapable of evacuation equivalent to the capability of the general population. 3. The building is of Type III Construction (Exterior Protected Combustible). 4. The use group for the proposal falls under Group I-2. (This use group shall include all buildings used for housing people suffering from physical limitations because of health or age, including among others day nurseries, hospitals, sanitariums, clinics, infirmaries, orphanages, and homes for the aged and infirm.) 5. The plans submitted for approval lack provision for a system of automatic sprinklers. 6. Site access: The proposed building cannot be accessed from all sides by fire department apparatus. Inadequate attention to site details can place this building in an unnecessarily vulnerable position. If the building's fire defenses are compromised by preventing adequate fire department access, the loss should be compensated by a more adequate system of internal building protection. It should be noted that this building was formerly used as a school and is currently protected by a complete system of automatic sprinklers. The proposed use represents a change in existing use as defined by the Massachusetts State Building Code Section 105.0 and shall comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Code. Adequate life safety design for a building is often related only to compliance with the minimum requirements of local building regulations. This may or may not provide sufficient occupant protection, depending upon the particular building function and occupant activities. Conscious incorporation of fire safety into buildings is too frequently given minimal attention by the designer, and building designers are content, as are their clients, to meet the minimum safety standards of the building code. It is often incorrectly assumed that the codes provide completely adequate measures rather than the minimum. The approach to building design requires a familiarity with the reaction of people in fire emergencies. These reactions can differ widely depending upon the physical and mental capabilities and conditions of building occupants. Sufficient means of egress cannot provide adequate protection in occupancies where occupants are confined or are physically or mentally unable to escape without effective and immediate assistance. If the economic cost of fire safety is judged to be prohibitive, the occupancy or the structure should be changed or prohibited because there is no justification for subjecting building occupants to an unreasonable level of peril from a fire. It is my professional opinion that the building design as presented fails to provide the necessary level of protection to the occupants and represents a step backwards in providing safe, quality housing for the elderly in Salem. Signed, i Robert W. Turner, Fire Marshal cc: Chief Joseph Sullivan Mr. Joseph Carroll 3 w" Chi# of "Salem, ffla5sarhusetts Aire Pepartmrid �Heabquarters 48 lz&f ette �itred Joseph F. Sullivan o Lem, Ott. 01970 Chief March 2, 1988 City of Salem s Mr. William H. Munroe, Inspector of BuildingsOne Salem Green _= Salem, Ma 01970 ' Dear Mr. Munroe: I have reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed congregate housing at #3 Broad Street as submitted by Mr. Joseph Carroll for the Architects Collaborative. I have failed to approve these plans based upon the following criteria: 1. The proposed use of the building is "Congregate Housing", classified as a "Residential Board and Care Occupancy" by N.F.P.A. 101 Life Safety Code. 2. The anticipated occupancy of this building is comprised of elderly residents incapable of evacuation equivalent to the capability of the general population. 3. The building is of Type III Construction (Exterior Protected Combustible). 4. The use group for the proposal falls under Group I-2. (This use group shall include all buildings used for housing people suffering from physical limitations because of health or age, including among others day nurseries, hospitals, sanitariums, clinics, infirmaries, orphanages, and homes for the aged and infirm.) 5. The plans submitted for approval lack provision for a system of automatic sprinklers. 6. Site access: The proposed building cannot be accessed from all sides by fire department apparatus. Inadequate attention to site details can place this building in an unnecessarily vulnerable position. If the building's fire defenses are compromised by preventing adequate fire department access, the loss should be compensated by a more adequate system of internal building protection. 4 It should be noted that this building was formerly used as a school and is currently protected by a complete system of automatic sprinklers. The proposed use represents a change in existing use as defined by the Massachusetts State Building Code Section 105.0 and shall comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Code. Adequate life safety design for a building is often related only to compliance with the minimum requirements of local building regulations. This may or may not provide sufficient occupant protection, depending upon the particular building function and occupant activities. Conscious incorporation of fire safety into buildings is too frequently given minimal attention by the designer, and building designers are content, as are their clients, to meet the minimum safety standards of the building code. It is often incorrectly assumed that the codes provide completely adequate measures rather than the minimum. The approach to building design requires a familiarity with the reaction of people in fire emergencies. These reactions can differ widely , depending upon the physical and mental capabilities and conditions of building occupants. Sufficient means of egress cannot provide adequate protection in occupancies where occupants are confined or are physically or mentally unable to escape without effective and immediate assistance. If the economic cost of fire safety is judged to be prohibitive, the occupancy or the structure should be changed or prohibited because there is no justification for subjecting building occupants to an unreasonable level of peril from a fire. It is my professional opinion that the building design as presented fails to provide the necessary level of protection to the occupants and represents a step backwards in providing safe, quality housing for the elderly in Salem. Signed, Robert W. Turner, Fire Marshal cc: Chief Joseph Sullivan Mr. Joseph Carroll 'CONU,`°� Ctu of '*Arne' 'fflnssar4us tts Ilublic VrnpertU Pepartinent J�t01MMt +'tv Plitilling Pepttrtntent OnP AIPITI (brPPn 745-9595 Ext.380 Director of Public Property William H. Monroe April 6, 1988 Mr. Joseph Carroll T.A.0 Inc. 46 Brattle Street Cambridge, MA. 02138 RE: �3_B or ad-St� Congregate Housing 205 Bridge St . , Elderly Housing Dear Joe, Pursuant to our recent telephone conversations regarding the above re- ferenced projects, this office knows of no reason at the present time that building permits cannot be issued. We are now in the process of issueing these permits, as there will be sixteen ( 16) permits issued for 3 Broad St. and thirty five (35) permits issued for 205 Bridges street, it will be a few days before they can be picked up. It is our opinion that both buildings will be in Use Group R and de- signated R-2 use, therefore both buildings will have sprinklered basements. I have based my opinion of the R-2 use classification at. 3 Broad Street on your code consultants report (Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc.of June 23, 1987) , and on a copy of code revision proposal (201 .3 General Definations, dwelling unit congregate) that I received from the State Board of Building Regulations and Standards on December 22, 1987, also on my understanding that all other congregate housing projects in the Commonwealth have been R-2 use classified. I am in receipt of your letter dated April 5, 1988 and realize that there are some procedural matters that will be resolved by you as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to call if I may be of further assistance. Regards, pt Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Inspector C.C. Elaine Hart @ S.H.A T .H E ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 5 April 1988 Mr. Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Inspector - City of Salem a One Salem Green Salem, MA Dear Mr. Santry: Following our conversation yesterday, we took the following actions in order to clear up any remaining issues concerning the Salem Housing Projects before the Thursday deadline for State Notice of Award to the low bidders. I. We met with Mr. Turner yesterday afternoon and received approval for the 3 Broad Street project. A letter from Mr. Turner is being forwarded to your office. Mr. Turner has previously reviewed and approved 205 Bridge Street. II. Please refer to your letter of March 17. Our action on the items are listed below: A. Routing Slip / 1 . I went to the Assessors Department following our meeting with Mr. Turner yesterday. I was told by that Department that I needed to submit a building permit with a plot plan. Therefore, they would not sign the routing slip. I will submit building permits with plot plans for both buildings when the permit is issued. The Assessors Department also corrected the street address to 205 Bridge Street. ✓2. The Planning Department has signed the routing slip. 1/3. Mr. Turner has signed 205 Bridge Street and will sign 3 // Broad Street. /4. Department of Public Services - George Whitten has VVVVVV signed 3 Broad Street and will sign 205 Bridge Street when the Salem Redevelopment Authority provides him with the Letter of Agreement that the SRA will use the money from the sale of the land for sidewalk, etc. repair around the site. The letter is available in the Planning Department but the copier was broken yesterday afternoon. R T C a ria a s i -, u .- � I_ EPH0N r-. .. 1 7 . . .. _ _ _ T = 1 EX C' .. 1 5 T ':i rt _„-. a LT t{ C -.. ... M I_ Letter to Mr. Stephen W. Santry 5 April 1988 Page 2 �. The Water Department did not sign the letter because they only provide up to 1 1/2" meters, ours are larger. However, they did specify the meters would be inspected by that department and must be in cubic feet. B. Plan Examination Application, etc. - The application for plan examination has been submitted previously. It is contained in the specification books for each project. The contractor license numbers are: 1 . DeIulius Bros. (205 Bridge Street) State - 039580 City - 108 2. Rene' LaMarre State - 022065 City - 357 C. Fire Department Certificate of Approval Forms - Complete D. Construction Control Form - Attached E. Certified Plot Plan - As per our Agreement yesterday, this will be prepared and submitted for 205 Bridge Street prior to excavation. F. Responses to Questions from your March 17 1988 Letter: 1 . Sprinklers in Basement - 205 Bridge Street - Agreed to as per Section 1202.13 of the Mass. State Building Code. 2. Refer to attached letter from M. L. Dee. 3. Refer to attached letter from M. L. Dee. 4. Refer to attached letter from M. L. Dee. 5. We are currently researching this item. As per our discussion yesterday, if required, we shall apply for a waiver from the State Plumbing Board and will abide by their decision. 6. In Addendum #4 we clarified wall construction - corridor walls and unit separation wall are to be of one hour construction. Stair walls and elevator walls are to be of two hour construction. Letter to Mr. Stephen W. Santry 5 April 1988 Page 3 ✓ 7. The door rating for will be "A" rated. /. "J" doors into stairwell will be two hour. 9. See attached letter from MAI . /10. See Item #11 and back—up. /1 1 . See attached letter and calculations from M. L. Dee. Please also find attached a copy of the approval letter from The Salem Historical Society which you requested yesterday. As we have discussed today, in order for EOCD to vote to award the contracts on Thursday, a letter from the Salem Building Department stating that the issues raised have been resolved or a course of action agreed to and that the permits are ready to be issued. We also agree to complete all procedural matters discussed previously in this letter in a prompt manner. If there are any questions regarding any of the information above, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, TH ACTS C LABO V C. J seph Carroll roject Manager cc: Ms. Elayne Hart (SHA) Mr. Paul McPartland (EOCD) Mr. Richard Sabin (TAC) Mr. Jim Puri (TAC) 1•" Rene C. Lamarre Co., Inc. General Contractors 23 Oakview Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Page 1 of 2 April 4, 1989 n a' F rn The Architects Collaborative, Inc. n iz 46 Brattle Street M-< Cambridge, MA 02138 3co w m Attn: Roger Sheppard Rd--. —Oliver School-Ctrs Salem Housingf•n eno Gentlemen: C-y#667-7A . . . .as a very favorite English professor used to say. . . ."Fools venture, where angels fear to tread." Well, no one has ever called me an angel, and I seem to have something on my shoes. . . . Therefore, allow me to apologize for having accepted verbal orders, as I confirm the following: Your order per phone call at +/- 9:OOa.m. April 3, 1989 to make changes at reference job (see enclosure-4 copies) has been aumended by your phone call at +/- 11:45a.m. this date. . . . Please allow me to point out that such stupidity on my part will not happen again. . . . Now, with all apologies tended to allow me to bring you up to date with our new progress schedule. . . . All doors (as approved) will be machined and prehung, delivered to job - Monday, April 17, 1989 with installation to start on Tuesday, April 18, 1989. Time and Material will be recorded daily for revised conditions indicated on second floor at Stair No. One as indicated on enclosure (revised) ASK-5. . . . Please be advised that this office will have to request a Change Order to close down the project and ask for reimbursement to protect the structure if completion is further delayed due to failure of the Owners, Designers, or State Guardians of the wealth to come to an understanding of the Massachusetts General Laws and the State Building Code. . . . April 4, 1989 Page 2 of 2. The Architects Collaborative, Inc. Please be advised that all ORDERS to change the project Specified and Designed Concepts must be delivered, in writing to this office. RCL Co. , Inc. is performing as "General Contractor" to the Salem Housing Authority under the "Control Construction" Chapter No. 127 direction of the "Prime Designer": TAC, Cambridge, MA. and must point out that the Time Frame of this project has been badly bent out of proportion. At the present time our Completion date of ninety (90) days is adaquate to provide the finished product you desire. But, completion can not be accomplished without Certified Plan for approved encroachment upon a Fire Lane Right of Way, nor the balance of shop drawings and selections needed from your office. Very truly yours, Bob Ambrose BA/mw Enclosure (4) cc: E. Hart, Salem Housing Authority R. Peters, Clerk of Works A. Ring, E.O.C.D. S. Santry, Salem Building Inspector B. Ambrose File V6 c.4 op I V149 o •.2r h it, s►.- = � 102& � � S6 , ., � .. /YV. U•v//-"� dov �1. 'Y / O� �f / I dN/`'' . � /iso-/ 7- �/ �•_e_ ✓� l/�'•, � II y- ��' �� ♦ 1 /�I Y�' IJLL1,Ll i ;we N 2 kJ G 4 ASL �dG•eR�� f'�/v5�a-` �',W/ e li9L.c-�i/ l// 77 74 �► l .+�ca�iow 74 6� c- 1 A-/cia v4 /Cot lJ 1 i� �v-Ch �acti /aiY/ 6::�1i—, -e 4A /S �� !e A410- Liv v j a 4, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. 46 BRATTLE STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 20 March 1989 Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ATTN: Mr. Steven Santry RE: 3 Broad Street, Salem Elderly Housing Stair No. 1 Gentlemen: In accordance with our phone discussion today on the subject matter, please see the enclosed drawing ASK-5, dated 20 March '89. This shows the enclosure of the stair at the second floor with 1 hour partitioning and the Label door relocated at the stair with magnetic hold open which will be deactivated on alarm. It is our understanding that this will be acceptable in lieu of the sprinkler solution sent you in drawings ASK-5 & 6 of 21 Feb. '89. If you have further questions please call. Yours sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC. Roger Sheppard, Construction Administrator. encl. cc: R. Sabin Reggie Peters ✓Rene C. Lamerre File 31VO 31vOs ynar'sln a aGt�13 4 yA03HO) Ay NMVHaovim -LILC' C1Y0Ag -4, _ hy MOP� ZQ ai LUJ ----7 N -•i I —� � to 1/ I 1. I. U 3!5u ' 0 g I II mr- \ j m I i F IC I (l O VCT cAI2P cam. �� l� I m X739 �E ,PE�Ji�EDc> 39.32 22_i_ _yn— i Sc n ^ j Fit NYS ` c ti /Z.4 t i1 vT � 1°AtZc.�E� G s N, i vl N 19.4 • ____.J��_�� 60.^S t I l 1' Ln A A �9.19A _ A m y co j C_ n L r rn Nc O a r I co g m< to am rn o ID a rn N N a CO PZ or Pt04V oFt fvo LO cy 7-f O A/ REfe2EUCEs: - t5A L. M $ef Rtc-.-BIt- PG.- Pre�dre or dor PC9N . PC. 84. Zo9 P[ . 31 �hdV4 C. GAKAM Cn�t!�i [t�ou / C£2T/FY TNHT THF 8UJLD/i1J(, s HE 2EO0c, ' JAU 12 , /989 ,U A,Q£ GoC/ITEo � s ua o AS SHO(JV. �� ROBERT.�� 4'0 40 N0/2tH SNORE 3U/ZVEV Cox P. DATE /REGIS r8/ Ess EX Street sd/err! 1 9C [/JvD SUQv£/02 °qE Laea, 4X 11841 Rene C. Co., Inc. General Contractors s 23 Oakview Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 April 3, 1989 Mr. Steve Santry, Building Inspector Salem Green Salm, MA 01970 Dear Sir: ReC667-71A__---/liver School aleHousing Enclosed please find for your records, latest revised drawing indicating foundation line for new porch at above project. Very truly yours, I--& zq Bob Ambrose BA/naa Enc. ..o 1 � W n L f� rn p N�7 Drn CO Z m s to 3L m a o M a N C ZON N 4" ir�►- >-' C ) —io gni G.G . Zte ate ui a, �-�"�G��-moi 9/o a�,�-�C.e_ •---�� 0CLI Zui c� =o e3/Oct— (Xv� �( Nekj As ��J""r-cZIO I✓ 2 d _ /VioA/- ,6�Y ¢dr✓--__ l l rfl17A� _ Hen', r \ z ------- ._. 00 rFv7 i WH �R - _.: O ;I \ ul J -5, 7 cn N R" d1Y.°1`3 tt Y,�) �W Ili I602 \ ,•� p1 low Y JOB NO. vv-i �nnAA� 2� FWe �V191QO SCALE ° Q Z ` DATE SHEET `- ® Rolf Jensen &Associates, Inc. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS• BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTSCu T - - - REPORT ON AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SALEM ELDERLY HOUSING UNITS Prepared for : THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE 46 Brattle Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 54 )'? L 087 a TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 1 PERTINENT INFORMATION 1 OLIVER SCHOOL - BUILDING 667-7A 2 DESCRIPTION 2 CODE REQUIREMENTS 2 BUILDING 667-7B 3 DESCRIPTION 3 CODE REQUIREMENTS 4 CONCLUSION 4 The Salem Elderly Housing Units Page 1 - W5554 Automatic Sprinkler Requirements June 23 , 1987 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The Architects Collaborative (Client) is designing the renovation of an existing school and the construction of a new three-story building to provide housing for the elderly. Rolf Jensen & Associates (Consultant ) has been asked by The Architects Collaborative to do research and provide an opinion regarding code requirements for the installation of automatic sprinklers in either of the buildings . According to the Client , because the Elderly Housing Units will be funded by the State, special requirements are incorporated in the design. The State specifies it will not incorporate into the design anything that the Massachusetts State Code would not require. Therefore, only the requirements of the Massachusetts State Code will apply. PERTINENT INFORMATION The Architects Collaborative has supplied the following information to Rolf Jensen & Associates . This information is assumed to be correct in the findings stated in this report. 1 . The applicable code : Massachusetts State Building Code, 4th Edition 2 . Area of each of the buildings 3. Construction types of each of the buildings 4 . Occupancy type of each of the buildings : R-2 Rolf Jensen & Associates has not been asked to address any other design feature of the building except for the requirements of automatic sprinkler protection. Therefore, it is assumed that all other features of the building comply with - 11. State and Local requirements . The Salem Elderly Housing Units Page 2 - W5554 Automatic Sprinkler Requirements June 23, 1987 OLIVER SCHOOL - BUILDING 667-7A DESCRIPTION Building 667-7A is an existing building which is two-stories in height . The building will be renovated, however, it will remain two stories in height with an unoccupied basement . The total area will be 11, 322 square feet with the area of the largest floor being 3,774 square feet . The building will be Type 4B ( unprotected frame) construction. This building ' s occupancy qualified as congregate housing as specified in Section 424, The Massachusetts State Code . There will be a maximum of 16 residents within the building . CODE REQUIREMENTS Article 3, Table 305 of the Code specifies the maximum area and height of all buildings and structures, between exterior walls, as governed by the type of construction and the use-group classification . However, because this building is an existing building and is not increased in height or area, this Table does not apply. Therefore, automatic sprinklers are not required within the existing building to obtain increases in area or height requirements for the structure. However , the existing building of Type 4B construction would meet the requirements for construction type of a new building with an R-2 Occupancy Type. Section 424 of the Massachusetts State Code, Section on Group Residences, specifies the requirements for this building. Section 424 .2 . 1 allows existing buildings of Type 4B Construction to be converted to group residences regardless of height . This Section does require "fire warning systems" , but not automatic sprinklers. The final section pertaining to the conversion of an existing building is Article 22 of the Massachusetts State Building Code. The provisions of that Article apply to repair , Iteration and/or addition to : :icting buildings . The i)cen assumed : The Salem Elderly Housing Units Page 3 - W5554 Automatic Sprinkler Requirements June 23, 1987 2 . There are no outstanding notices of violation or other order of the building official which will not be corrected with the proposed work . The alteration of the Oliver School is classified in Article 22 as a changing of use group to a use-group of lesser hazard index number . This applies because the hazard index is reduced by changing from the current A-4 Occupancy ( hazard index = 4 ) to congregate housing (hazard index = 2 ) . Section 2203 of Article 22 contains the requirements for the change to a use-group of equal or lesser hazard. This Section does require the installation of fire alarm systems and several other emergency systems . However , it does not specifically require the installation of automatic sprinklers . Section 2203 . 2 of Article 22 states that requirements exceeding those required for new construction may be reduced or removed, in part or completely, if not required by this Code for new construction. Therefore, the partially sprinklered portions of the building may have the sprinklers removed provided they are not within storage and workshop areas of the building or within the cellar or basement . Storage and workshop areas or sprinklered cellars or basements are required to remain sprinklered if they are currently sprinklered, because these areas in new buildings are required to be sprinklered by Section 1202 . 12 and 1202 . 13 . However , individual storage or workshop areas located entirely within the dwelling unit are not required to remain sprinklered. BUILDING 667-7B DESCRIPTION Building 667-7B is three stories in height with an unoccupied basement . The total area of the building is 31, 245 square feet with an area of 7, 811 square feet per floor. The building will be of Type 4A protected frame construction. �(?1"! rtOR .. j :C E'71� '_^ -L"` ..!:{:i( ' I is tt'L" LLn j. 0 ti.'F I . The Salem Elderly Housing Units Page 4 - W5554 Automatic Sprinkler Requirements June 23, 1987 CODE REQUIREMENTS Table 305 of the Massachusetts State Code specifies the maximum area and height of all buildings and structures as governed by the type of construction and the use-group classification. For an R-2 Occupancy of Type 4A construction the height of the building is limited to three stories and 40 feet, and the area of the building is limited to 10,200 square feet per floor . Because the building is greater than one story in height, this area must be reduced by 20 percent . Therefore, the maximum area per floor for a three-story R-2 Occupancy of Type 4A Construction is 8, 160 square feet per floor . Because Building 667-7B is only 7, 811 square feet per floor and is not greater than three stories in height , automatic sprinklers are not required to obtain the allowable area and height increases due to automatic fire suppression installation. Article 12 of the Massachusetts State Building Code details the requirements for Fire Protection Systems . Section 1202 of this Article states where fire protection systems are required . No requirements are specified for complete automatic sprinkler installation of R-2 (Residential ) occupancies . However, requirements are stated for storage and workshop areas within these buildings which are not entirely located within a dwelling unit . Also, requirements are stated for the installation of automatic sprinklers in cellars or basements which exceed 2 ,500 square feet in area. CONCLUSION The Massachusetts State Building Code contains no requirements for the installation of automatic sprinklers throughout R-2 Occupancies. Certain areas within these structures may require the installation of automatic sprinklers, however , the entire structure is not required to be sprinklered by the Massachusetts State Building Code. Prepared by: ler , P . Ps vcia. e :. ,nagcr J797R .CON�,4 Ctv of tt�Ylll, lassar4usetts 3 3 IIublir Propertg Uepartinent Anillinq i9epartntent (Onr 3ealem (kirren 7.15-OZ 13 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice %I !Martineau. Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. February 8 , 1988 Mr . Joe Carroll T .A . 0 Inc . 46 Brattle Street Cambridge , MA . 02138 RE : Housing for the Elderly , Ash St . , Salem ,MA . Congregate Housing , Broad St . , Salem,MA . Dear Joe , Pursuant to our telephone conversation on February 5 , 1988 re- garding building permits for the above referenced projects , the following steps should be taken . I . Submit three sets of drawings to Salem Fire Prevention for approval . 2 . Submit two sets of these approved drawings along with two permit applications to the building department , routing slips should be complete when submitting application to building department . 3 . Construction control forms for each project should be completed , signed and sealed . I have discussed the permitting process with Mr. Munroe and we would be receptive to issuing the permits when the three conditions above are met , however we would need a State and City of Salem license number from the selected contractor before any work is commenced . T have enclosed the necessary forms for you to complete . If more information is needed please do not hesitate to call me . I look foward to working with you on these projects . Sincerely , ,ZZ. / Stephen W . Santry Assistant Building Inspector SWS/eaf JOB MEETING NOTES qt on DEC 1 JOB: Salem Elderly Housing Job $ 85013 CITY OF S<\L't ?ihS5. DATE: 3 December 1987 PRESENT: Bob Turner (Salem Fire Department) Steve Santry (Salem Building Department) Elaine Hart, Steve Zisson (Salem Housing Authority) Michael Dee (M.L. Dee &, Assoc. ) Joe Carroll (TAC) I. 667-7A Oliver School Renovation After a presentation of the drawings, the following comments were made: 1. Mr. Turner stated that he was unsure if "Congregate Housing" should be classified under Section 424 - Group Residence or under Institutional I-2. He requested that Mr. Santry of the Building Department review the drawings and the code and advise the Fire Department as to which classification was appropriate. 2. Mr. Turner questioned the report prepared by Rolf Jensen & Associates (Code Consultants to TAC) with regard to the decrease in the hazard index. Mr. Turner stated that the most recent use of the building was for offices for the Recreation Department rather than as a school (assembly occupancy) as stated in the report. TAC to review this question and respond. 3. Mr. Turner asked why it was necessary to remove the existing sprinklers from the building. I responded due to the near complete gutting of the building required for this conversion, saving the sprinklers would be nearly impossible. Mr. Zisson also remarked that the existing system is probably beyond repair given its age and length of inactivity. 4. I reviewed for those present the position of the State regarding the sprinkler issue. The position simply stated is that EOCD has an agreement with the City of Salem to provide funds for the construction of elderly housing and in return for that funding the city has agreed to both waive permit fees and not require any construction which is above and beyond the State of Massachusetts Building Code. Salem Elderly Housing 3 December 1987 Page 2 5. Mr. Turner responded that first of all he felt permit fees could not be waived. He also stated that the primary responsibility of those involved in the project was to promote the safety of the occupants and that the cost of the sprinklers as a percentage of the overall construction cost was justified given the substantial improvements in safety that would be realized. A short discussion then took place regarding either a meeting with EOCD officials to discuss the issue or the possibility of proceeding with the bidding of the job and including the sprinklers as an add alternative to the bid. All parties present agreed to try to resolve the issue quickly in order to allow the project to move ahead into the bidding phase. 6. Mr. Dee reviewed the location of standpipes, heat and smoke detectors, the location of the siamese connection, type of heating system, removal of existing oil tanks, and connection of the fire alarm system into the city loop. Additional comments by the Building and/or Fire Departments will be made following the determination of building classification by Mr. Santry. 7. A short discussion was held concerning the interstitial space which will be approximately 2'-0" high between the existing ceilings and the new hung ceilings. These spaces are not currently shown having either sprinklers or smoke detectors. 8. The site plan was reviewed for clearances for fire fighting equipment. Although it appears that entrance drive off Broad Street is acceptable, there may be tight clearances in the rear due to the parking layout of 1 Broad Street. Mr. Turner to review and comment. Mr. Turner also stated that this building was not within the Central Fire District. 9. A complete set of drawings and a copy of the Rolf Jensen Code Review will be sent to both the Building and Fire Departments along with meeting notes. Salem Elderly Housing 3 December 1987 Page 3 II 667-7B - Bridge and Ash After a presentation of the drawings, the following comments were made: 1. Mr. Turner stated that this parcel was within the Central Fire District of the city. He said that he believed Type 4A construction was not permitted within the fire limits. We review Mass. State Building Code Section 302.2 and determined that Type 4A construction is permitted provided that the building is in compliance with Tables 214 and 305 and located in accordance with the requirements of Table 302. 2. Having determined that 4A construction was permitted on the site, it was agreed that sprinklers are not required for this building according to the Code. 3. Michael Dee reviewed the siamese connection location And the location of the standpipes with Mr. Turner. Mr. Turner stated that he would like both 2 1/2" and 1 1/2" valves on the standpipes but no hose need be provided. II 667-7B - Bridge and Ash (cont.) 4. Michael Dee reviewed the fire alarm risers including the location of the pull stations. The system will be wired into the city loop. Also reviewed were the type of heating system and the location of heat and smoke detectors. Because the existing drawings currently show sprinklers, the Fire Protection Drawings need to be revised to locate additional detectors. 5. A complete set of drawings will be forwarded to both the Building and Fire Departments for review along with the meeting notes. A request was made that if during their review of the drawings any other items of concern arose, the departments would contact the architect for clarification. cc: Attendees Mr. Paul McPartland (EOCD) Mr. Richard Sabin (TAC) Mr. Roger Sheppard (TAC) 111-itV D �I�Erit, c�55ttC�iLiSPtt� s�rL 'Tire Pepartmeut lienbquarterz 48 `Ji agette :'itreet Joseph F. Sullivan balrm, , Ezi. 01970 oa Chief �o - March 2, 1988 g1 co City of Salem Mr. William H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings -One Salem Green Salem, Ma 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: I have reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed congregate housing at #3 Broad Street as submitted by Mr. Joseph Carroll for the Architects Collaborative. I have failed to approve these plans based upon the following criteria: 1. The proposed use of the building is "Congregate Housing", . classified as a "Residential Board and Care Occupancy" by N.F.P.A. 101 Life Safety Code. 2. The anticipated occupancy of this building is comprised of elderly residents incapable of evacuation equivalent to the capability of the general population. 3. The building is of Type III Construction (Exterior Protected Combustible). 4. The use group for the proposal falls under Group I-2. (This use group shall include all buildings used for housing people suffering from physical limitations because of health or age, including among others day nurseries, hospitals, sanitariums, clinics, infirmaries, orphanages, and homes for the aged and infirm.) 5. The plans submitted for approval lack provision for a system of automatic sprinklers. 6. Site access: The proposed building cannot be accessed from all sides by fire department apparatus. Inadequate attention to site details can place this building in an unnecessarily vulnerable position. If the building's fire defenses are compromised by preventing adequate fire department access, the loss should be compensated by a more adequate system of internal building protection. It should be noted that this building was formerly used as a school and is currently protected by a complete system of automatic sprinklers. The proposed use represents a change in existing use as defined by the Massachusetts State Building Code Section 105.0 and shall comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Code. Adequate life safety design for a building is often related only to compliance with the minimum requirements of local building regulations. This may or may not provide sufficient occupant protection, depending upon the particular building function and occupant activities. Conscious incorporation of fire safety into buildings is too frequently given minimal attention by the designer, and building designers are content, as are their clients, to meet the minimum safety standards of the building code. It is often incorrectly assumed that the codes provide completely adequate measures rather than the minimum. The approach to building design requires a familiarity with the reaction of people in fire emergencies. These reactions can differ widely depending upon the physical and mental capabilities and conditions of building occupants. Sufficient means of egress cannot provide adequate protection in occupancies where occupants are confined or are physically or mentally unable to escape without effective and immediate assistance. If the economic cost of fire safety is judged to be prohibitive, the occupancy or the structure should be changed or prohibited because there is no justification for subjecting building occupants to an unreasonable level of peril from a fire. It is my professional opinion that the building design as presented fails to provide the necessary level of protection to the occupants and represents a step backwards in providing safe, quality housing for the elderly in Salem. Signed, C--�tr,-2� � Robert W. Turner, Fire Marshal cc: Chief Joseph Sullivan Mr. Joseph Carroll dJ��w�tR c.c. City Clerk, I✓ g Building Inspector 9 RECEIVED Salem ! I ' tori i al Cof�'ifiiiSSioi1 - ' HOLIsing Au:li^, ilv CITY HALL. SALEM. MASS. 01970 744-4580 y i ime-- m CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS —9< o It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commiss on.;ha_sa) determined that the proposed construction O ; reconstruction demolition ( ) ; moving O; alteration O; painting O ; sign or oyther s appurtenant fixture ( ) work as described below in the . .. McIntire Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Property: 3 Broad Street Name of Record Owner: Sa1rm Umming Anrhority DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Replacement of 6/6 sash with 9/6 sash on all elevations (all new window openings must have lintels to match existing sandstone or may be`, concrete with color added) ; addition of elevator infill on left side elevation (brick color, size and joints to match existing); - removal of fire escapes; replacement of vents on front facade with matching infill brick. . I will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: August 18, 1986 SALEM H/I'STORICAL COMMISSION By AAAAALiKAA -A, Chairman 1te. �dAOw vis wbT w T'ob,,( oJEzT� _ A-cwE 6Cm..a1L. Ow( -..kLs A-It w.f L —ver 'J.-q -RasT -4..01 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 667-7A PROJECT TITLE: Salem Elderly Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Broad Street NAME OF BUILDING: Oliver School NATURE OF PROJECT' 16 nits ot Congregate Housing and AssociatedCommunity Space IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I, RIr- +,AK12 An -EEADINI Registration No. 22'75 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I, OR MY PREDECESSOR, ALSO A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCE-RNING- ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL X STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL ,; rn OTHER (specify) - s FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE;cSUCH PLANS; COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE', MASSAGHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICES AND APPLrCABLE"fAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I, OR MY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review the approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. . SIGN � SUBSCRIBED -MD SWORN TO 4EFORE ME THIS ZZ DAY OF19 �d may° MAY COMMISSION EXPIRES 23 NOTARY PUBLIC suit rAm=t.civrzu rtt] 1 7 1588 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 667-7A PROJECT TITLE: Salem Elderly Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Broad Street, Salem, MA. NAME OF BUILDING: Oliver School NATURE OF PROJECT: 16 Units of Congregate Housing and associated Community Space I//N//ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, Registration No. Z7Z7y BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL - — FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL X- OTHER (specify) - FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of shop drawings, sa:Qles and other submittals of the contractor as required by the oonstruction contract doanents as sutrrntted for building permit, and approval for ccnfornence to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction caTonents requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFAC COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS JF'DAY OF 19 1-1 Ra 4a I Y FU LIC m MY COMMISSION EXPIRES lI -C1 I 7CEIVED PEB 1 7 1988 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 667-7A PROJECT TITLE: Salem Elderly Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Broad Street, Salem, MA. NAME OF BUILDING: Oliver School NATURE OF PROJECT: 16 Units of Congregate Housing and associated Community Space IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I, Af/ 'VMZ 14 . �Azez�- Registration No. 27Z7�2 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: r� ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL — FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL X MECHANICAL `.: -' --j; - OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: I . Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract doaxnEnts as submitted for building permit, and approval for canfornEme to the design concept. . 2. Review and approval of the quality cmtrul procedures for all oode-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or er ineering profession&& inspection of critical aznstruction caTments requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACT COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. �/ tiG/C L � ( f� SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /0 DAY OF 19 NOT RY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES REQEI ED FEB 1 7 1988 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 667-7A PROJECT TITLE: Salem Elderly Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Broad Street, Salem, MA. NAME OF BUILDING: Oliver School NATURE OF PROJECT: 16 Units of Congregate Housing and associated Community Space IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I, ��6� L �� Registration No. 272i'y BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL='. _ FIRE PROTECTION X ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, Sl1CH` PLAflS, _ COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE_ MASSAFyHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of slop drawings, saTples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction ccntract dp_�ts as subnitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-reZdred controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction oanpor>ents requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFAC Y COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. c'� SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWOR�1 TO BEFORE ME THIS OF 1951! r NUI RY P' LIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES /-0I-q CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 667-7A PROJECT TITLE: Salem Elderly Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Broad Street, Salem, MA. NAME OF BUILDING: Oliver School NATURE OF PROJECT: 16 Units of Congregate Housing and associated Community Space IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I+ 7 e'��rfr-4 A DE-= T�/{i 1X Registration No. =jI*�? �� BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL J FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PL`VRS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of shop drarir*s, swples and other submittals of the antractor as required by the construction contract docu is as s gmtted for building permit, and approval for conforr ante to the design carcept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all oock—required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or ergineering professional inspection of critical construction ca:Qanents requiring controlled materials or =istruction specified in the accepted eigineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND //SWORNN.TO BEFORE ME THIS /S DAY OF rP h>tc�cy 19_� 'C�yQ.L.CCV / Y PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 667-7A PROJECT TITLE: Salem Elderly Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Broad Street NAME OF BUILDING: Oliver School NATURE OF PROJECT' 16 nits ot Congregate Housing and Associatedommunity 6Dace IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I> RIC kiARD ,4. -EA.OI►J Registration No. 22-15 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I, OR MY PREDECESSOR, ALSO A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCE-RNING;T ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL X STRUCTURAL — - FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,--SUCK PLANS; COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ,MASSAGHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE�fAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I, OR MY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review the approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TOO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. Gy SUBSCRIBED D SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ZZ- DAY OF 1965 �OYh MAY COMMISSION EXPIRES 23 NOTARY PUBLIC sUEbLEN , t�` l'J 1 1 o J�IlPllt, � �d55cTrliLl5Ptt5 ��`�4` .sgE,;L4•��, Mire 17r}�xrt mrnt 3'1r'nq uxrlCrB G\,�,� p( ' 18 �Gnfngettr ?turf Iciseph F. Sullivan zdrm, ,-Na. L11970 Chief March 2, 1988 City of Salem Mr. William H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, Ma 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: I have reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed congregate housing at #3 Broad Street as submitted by Mr. Joseph Carroll for the Architects Collaborative. "I have failed to approve these plans based upon the following criteria: 1. The proposed use of the building is "Congregate Housing", classified as a "Residential Board and Care Occupancy" by N.F.P.A. 101 Life Safety Code. 2. The anticipated occupancy of this building is comprised of elderly residents incapable of evacuation equivalent to the capability of the general population. 3. The building is of Type III Construction (Exterior Protected Combustible). 4. The use group for the proposal falls under Group I-2. (This use group shall include all buildings used for housing people suffering from physical limitations because of health or age, including among others day nurseries, hospitals, sanitariums, clinics, infirmaries, orphanages, and homes for the aged and infirm.) 5. The plans submitted for approval lack provision for a system of automatic sprinklers. 6. Site access: The proposed building cannot be accessed from all sides by fire department apparatus. Inadequate attention to site details can place this building in an unnecessarily vulnerable position. If the building's fire defenses are compromised by preventing adequate fire department access, the loss should be compensated by a more adequate system of internal building protection. • ,r aJ . It should be noted that this building was formerly used as a school and is currently protected by a complete system of automatic sprinklers. The proposed use represents a change in existing use as defined by the Massachusetts State Building Code Section 105.0 and shall comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Code. Adequate life safety design for a building is often related only to compliance with the minimum requirements of local building regulations. This may or may not provide sufficient occupant protection, depending upon the particular building function and occupant :.activities. Conscious incorporation of fire safety into buildings is too frequently given minimal attention by the designer, and building designers are content, as are their clients, to meet the minimum safety standards of the building code. It is often incorrectly assumed that the codes provide completely adequate measures rather than the minimum. The approach to building design requires a familiarity with the reaction of people in fire emergencies. These reactions can differ widely depending upon the physical and mental capabilities and conditions of building occupants. Sufficient means of egress cannot provide adequate protection in occupancies where occupants are confined or are physically or mentally unable to escape without effecLive and immediate assistance. If the economic cost of fire safety is judged to be prohibitive, the occupancy or the structure should be changed or prohibited because there is no justification for subjecting building occupants to an unreasonable level of peril from a fire. It is my professional opinion that the building design as presented fails to provide the necessary level of protection to the occupants and represents a step backwards in providing safe, quality housing for the elderly in Salem. Signed, Robert W. Turner, Fire Marshal cc: Chief Joseph Sullivan Mr. Joseph Carroll THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE INC 1 14 March 1988 Mr. Robert W. Turner Fire Marshal City of Salem 48 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Turner: As a follow up to our meeting of March 2, we have taken the following actions: 1. We have reviewed the estimate and drawings of our 90% working drawing set. At that point in time, full sprinkler coverage of 3 Broad Street was included in the plans and specifications. The system included sprinklers in the basement, and at each occupied floor (including sprinkler heads in the interstitial spaces between existing ceilings and new hung ceilings.) In addition, a dry sprinkler system was designed for the attic spaces. A copy of the estimate is attached. 2. We have requested our mechanical engineer to survey the existing sprinkler system to determine its suitability for reuse/alteration. This survey will be conducted on Tuesday, March 15. Based upon that survey, we will estimate the cost of system alteration and review alternatives for partial sprinkler coverage. 3. We have notified the apparent low-bidder for the project, Rene C. Lamarre Co., Inc., that no award of contract will occur until this matter is resolved. In addition, we have reviewed your letter to Mr. Munroe and would like to make the following comments: 1. Reference Item 6 - Site Access: Please note the attached drawing. In the early stages of feasibility study for this project, we had proposed schemes which would have increased the site access over what is now available. The conditions E F L E S T R E E T C F N E R i D E ., S _ b doc42Cp iE _ Ex 2 01 Letter to Mr. Robert Turner 14 March 1988 } Page 2 of site access existed with the buildings on the site but were made more difficult by City approval of the parking/access scheme for 1 Broad Street as proposed by that buildings' developer. As you can see from the attached drawing, we proposed 12 parking spaces for 1 Broad Street and objected to the 18 spaces approved by the City during public hearings. At this point•in time, the lawyer for the Salem Housing Authority, Mr. William Lundregan, is prepared to go to the appropriate City agency and request that we increase the access easement within our property lines. However, in real terms only a removal of a number of previously approved parking spaces would enhance site access. 2. Reference Item 4: We have received from E.O.C.D. a copy of the proposed change to the State Building Code and have discussed the proposed change with Mr. Steve Demos, Chief Architect for that agency. Please reference the proposed Code Revision attached. As you can see from the cover sheet, the proposal to add a definition of Congregate Dwelling Unit was made by E.O.C.D. The wording contained on the second page is not the original wording proposed by E.O.C.D. but rather wording resulting from negotiations between E.O.C.D. and the State Building Code Commission. According to E.O.C.D. , the wording in the first paragraph relating to no more than six not necessarily related persons, is not for the building as a whole but for each individual Dwelling Unit as the definition is titled. This paragraph was inserted because of other restrictions governing the number of unrelated people who can live together. The final paragraph clarifies the Congregate Dwelling Units (plural) "shall be considered as Multi-Family Dwellings (R-2) not be considered boarding, lodging, dormitory, hotel, motel or institutional use." We shall contact Mr. David McCartney at the State Building Code Commission to verify that this is the proper reading of the definition. In summary, it is this offices' intention to fully comply with all provisions of the State Building Code and even exceed those standards if another source of funding can be found to provide the level of safety you feel is necessary. To that end, we will move quickly to determine the condition of the existing sprinkler system and produce documentation and an estimate for its potential reuse/alteration. Letter to Mr. Robert Turner 14 March 1988 Page 3 As we discussed in our meeting on March 2, the General Bids have been opened for this job. According to the public bidding laws, notification of the general contractor must be made within 30 days. Therefore, we respectfully request that you review the submitted set of plans for all other non-sprinkler related items so that there are no other issues that may arise following resolution of the sprinkler issue. If there are any questions relating to any information above or any of the attachments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, THE AR ECTS COLLABORATIVE, In Jo ph Carroll P oject Manager cc: Ms. Elayne Hart (SHA) Mr. Paul McPartland (EOCD) Chief Joseph Sullivan (SFD) Mr. William H. Munroe (SBD) / Mr. Steve Santry (SBD)✓ Mr. Richard Sabin (TAC) Mr. James Puri (TAC) Mr. Michael Dee (MDA) File I SALEM ELDERLY HOUSING Element: 15 - FIRE PROTECTION Sheet No.: 40 3- Project: SALEM 667-7A i! . SALEM, MA Date: June 1, 1987 Estimate: 90 % ESTIMATE s G Code Description Quantity Unit Unit Estimated Remarks Rate Cost i 153 FIRE PROTECTION i' • 15.0008 Equipment: 15.0010 Dry pipe valve 2 1/2 with air compressor 1 EA 800.00 800 i 15.0015 Fire hose cabinet 2 1/2" with extinguisher 3 EA 300.00 900 15.0020 Sprinkler heads with nipple, reducer and fittings (recessed) 125 EA 50.00 6,250 I '? 15.0025 Sprinkler heads (exposed) 55 EA 45.00 2,480 15.0045 Wet System Piping with Fittings and +' Supports ;x,r 15.0050 1" 510 LF 7.00 3,570 • 15.0055 1 1/4" 135 LF 9.00 1,220 15.0060 1 1/2" 210 LF 10.50 2,210 15.0065 2" 85 LF 12.10 1,030 K 15.0070 2 1/2" 60 LF 19.50 1,170 1r C �'N1r I Estimated Cost $ (Continued) Hanscomb ! ® Associates Inc. ... f f. SALEM ELDERLY HOUSINGElement: 15 - FIRE PROTECTION Sheet No.: 41 Project: SALEM 667-7A SALEM, IMDate: June 1, 1987 Estimate: 90 % ESTIMATE Code Description Quantity Unit Unit Estimated Remarks Rate Cost 153.15 (Continued) 15.0075 3 60 LF 22.90 1 ,370 ` 15.0080 4" 45 LF 28.70 1,290 15.0085 5" 75 LF 32.50 2,440 15.0090 Dry System Piping with Fittings and li Supports 15.0095 1" . 320 LF 7.00 2,240 15.0100 1 1/4': 45 LF 9.00 410 k 15.0105 1 1/2" 15 LF 10.50 160 15.0110 2" 155 LF 12.10 1,880 j 15.0115 2 1/2" 50 LF 19.50 980 15.0125 Testing and warranties 1 LS 2000.00 2,000 15.0130 Existing fire protection distribu- tion piping, wall hydrant removal (Allow) 1,500 15.0135 Miscellaneous 2,000 • I FIRE PROTECTION 35,900 Estimated Cost $ 35,900 i s goHenscomb Associates Inc. E;. Oj STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARPS One Ashburton Place — Room 1301 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617). 727-3200 CODE REVISION PROPOSAL FORM (please type or print) DALE: March 13 1987 Building Code Section No. 201.3 General Definitions Code Change No. Proponent (NAME) Executive Office of cam jnities and Development (ADDRESS) 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts (Please check type of amenduent proposed.) Change Section as follows: Delete Section and substitute as follows: R Add new Section as follows: Delete Section - no substitute. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT: Add definition for Congregate Dwelling Unit (See Attached) SUPPORTING STATEMENT(S): The intentionof this amendment is to place in the Code a definition of a .Congregate Dwelling Unit and define the applicable use group classification. s� �a J� Dwelling Unit, Congregate: - A building or portion thereof, owned by a municipal authority or an agency or department of the Commonwealth, housing no more than six not necessarily related residents all over the age of 55, with separate sleeping accommodations for each resident and in which living spaces, cooking and sanitary facilities are shared outside the sleeping accommodation, shall be considered a single dwelling unit. Where individual residents' rooms contain a sink, refrigerator and cook-top, and residents have individual or shared sanitary facilities, each individual resident room shall be considered a dwelling unit. For purposes. of the State Building Code, Congregate Dwelling Units shall be considered multi-family dwellings (R2) when not designed as attached or detached one- or two-family dwellings (R3) or (R4) . Congregate housing shall not be considered as a boarding, lodging, dormitory, hotel, motel or institutional use. Y�l,,con�44ps� SA v�1 frf � 1lu of tI�Clll, � ��I55rIL�T1I51'ft5 '� � ire 1'lryartmrnt �'{r:2ilqunr:rrs ' 18 TLalaneltc ?trrct alrm, .tea. L119 7 0 loscph F. Sullivan - Chict March 2, 1988 City of Salem Mr. William H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, Ma 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: I have reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed congregate housing at #3 Broad Street as submitted by Mr. Joseph Carroll for the Architects Collaborative. I have failed to approve these plans based upon the following criteria: 1. The proposed use of the building is "Congregate Housing", classified as a "Residential Board and Care Occupancy" by N.F.P.A. 101 Life Safety Code. 2. The anticipated occupancy of this building is comprised of elderly residents incapable of evacuation equivalent to the capability of the general population. 3. The building is of Type III Construction (Exterior Protected Combustible). d. The use group for the proposal falls under Group I-2. (This use group shall include all buildings used for housing people suffering from physical limitations because of health or age, including among others day nurseries, hospitals, sanitariums, clinics, infirmaries, orphanages, and homes for the aged and infirm.) 5. The plans submitted for approval lack provision for a system of automatic sprinklers. 6. Site access: The proposed building cannot be accessed from all sides by fire department apparatus. Inadequate attention to site details can place this building in an unnecessarily vulnerable position. If the building's fire defenses are compromised by preventing adequate fire department access, the loss should be compensated by a more adequate system of internal building protection. It should be noted that this building was formerly used as a school and is currently protected by a complete system of automatic sprinklers. The proposed use represents a change in existing use as defined by the Massachusetts State Building Code Section 105.0 and shall comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Code. Adequate life safety design for a building is often related only to compliance with the minimum requirements of local building regulations. This may or may not provide sufficient occupant protection, depending upon the particular building function acid occupant activities. Conscious incorporation of fire safety into building's is too frequently given minimal attention by the designer, and building designers are., content, as are their clients, to meet the minimum safety standards of the building code. It is often incorrectly assumed that the codes provide completely adequate measures rather than the minimum. The approach to building design requires a familiarity with the reaction of people in fire emergencies. These reactions can differ widely depending upon the physical and mental capabilities and conditions of building occupants. Sufficient means of egress cannot provide adequate protection in occupancies where occupants are confined or are physically or mentally unable to escape without effective and immediate assistance. If the economic cost of fire safety is judged to be prohibitive, the occupancy or the structure should be changed or prohibited because there is no justification for subjecting building occupants to an unreasonable level of peril from a fire. It is my professional opinion that the building design as presented fails to provide the necessary level of protection to the occupants and represents a step backwards in providing safe, quality housing for the elderly in Salem. Signed, Robert W. Turner, Fire Marshal cc: Chief Joseph Sullivan Mr. Joseph Carroll o - ' o e as 0 E O V Blood stfoet `may y 4Ne Oliver fe"011 4 !AANNRIEtrNtleaj ^I t Building Fi6CY1CNT fpR usL I flvlv9ep MBv^M BY MHIN. BLDG. L - FID HANUIX1104 RN AM A#4P >ENIOR �. �N ![bw�n7 � 12 Pj►7 M MID . � �. '1•"11 ) B.nID. oDRt«i Y� I I -. '.I anwimmg parkins cws>-w>cneHr> m al c'nn ILe � o e O E ' = THLSC > >axC> pROVIfX G>CHW1 fP.eGYs Ow E . M _ FDR L�v.W>IYG tlx pR utL OF The>C 67 P.rM1HUTIATI-N C Ov'RE.�IGCHT$ OF a Y 5 iR f DOM e,41%4 , ouvCR >CHOpL Mr.w WILOIWr ^Pw-k ICNT7 Existing coRwter1 B414DINb Y I PROPOSED SITE PLAN TNR DRAINING It FOR DISCUSSION VUR►OSES ONLY SBI01n 88-7-7r IN DETERMINING ACTUAL SOUNDARRS AND NASEMENTS salem HousUn _ii or��i FON THE OLIVER SCNOOL SURDING �� —� row. AM EE ,{ 4 _ 1100 fel. 05 '•�O• j/4-'' To � � Date 111 14 �� W+��p 'SeaS From �� 1Lt.i . ( 7t1 ) Sub' e - A),,A'^O _ n f c Wilson Jones company Signed £- G.LIRE FORM M BBB 3'BML O 1.V•PRIME.IR USA. 86 COOK 8913PC162 F,E ��.vnm4b :. (gitg of *1CM, Ang"ChU69f$i FFP 19 P2 .59 ��, ?Jr��F Paxrb of pPpz l CITY Lt DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SALEM HOUSING AUTHOR Y FO C, COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT AND VARIANCE AT,.3 BROAD STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held January 14, 1987 with the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to- abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OA. The petitioners, represented by Attorney William J. Lundregan, are requesting a Comprehensive Permit to allow construction of sixteen (16) units of congregate housing, under the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 4OB, Section 21 to 23 inclusive, and a Variance from the parking requirements of Section VII of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The locus of the property is in an R-2 District. The petitioners plan to construct congregate housing for the elderly by rehabil- itating the existing Oliver School House. The Comprehensive Permit and the Variance which have been requested may be granted u156n a Unding of the Board that: nr a1-.- special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally �I e �_"r affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b.' literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would ipgolve t substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and ti � � l �O c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from tle intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at tcj�e hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: co 1 . No oppos''ion to the petition was presented at the hearing; 2. Several neighbors and city officials spoke in favor of the petition; 3. The petition has the approval of the Salem Planning Department and the Salem Historical Commission. 0 On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, thec=) Board of Appeal concludes as follows: o rn 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the sub ectN property but not the district generally; o 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve subtstantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. v DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITYFORA913P�1`5`3 COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 3 BROAD ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Comprehensive Permit and the requested Variance, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1 . That all the conditions of the Salem Historical Commission be adhered to by the petitioners; 2. That the petitioners maintain not- less than three (3) parking spaces on the site of the rehabilitated building, said parking to comply with all the requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance; 3. That the building be rehabilitated as per the plans submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeal; 4. That all the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to fire safety be adhered to by the petitioners; 5. That all necessary building permits and Certificates of Occupancy be obtained. COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT & VARIANCE GRANTED .fames M. Fleming, Esq. Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 ^F i. GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTEF Ti'E OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC. PdGSANT TO MASS. GENERAL LA}'r'S. CHAPTER 808, SECT!014 11. TBE VAiiAWIE OR (-RANTED HEREIN. SHALL NOT TAXE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE iF.r.l,^„?,., F,w ITCATION OF THE CITY CLEP.!( THA' '0 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED !:?;:) FiD APPEAL HA"a F CR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. T4,W IT H45 ;;E[Y D!S'C $yc;lC•R RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX RE;ISTRY OF DEED' AND INDEXED UN:ER THE f;A;dE OF RECORD OR 1S RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. _. BOARD OF APPEAL n.n'k4i g( z flit of Clem, C assac4useff FEr 1y F2 sy DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SALE1 HOUSING_AUTHORITY FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT AND VARIANCE AT-3 BROAD STREET ,..� — - A hearing on this petition was held January 14 , 1987 with, the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal; Fleming and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioners, represented by Attorney William J. Lundregan, are requesting a Comprehensive Permit to allow construction of sixteen (16) units of congregate housing, under the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40B, Section 21 to 23 inclusive, and a Variance from:, the parking requirements of Section VII of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The locus of the property is in an R-2 District. The petitioners plan to construct congregate housing for the elderly by rehabil- itating the existing Oliver School House. The Comprehensive Permit and the Variance which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b.. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presen,tt!_' at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition to the petition was presented at the hearing; 2. Several neighbors and city .o_`ficials spoke in favor of the petition; 3. The petition has the approval of the Salem Planning Department and the Salem Historical Commission. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve subtstantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THE SAL&dl HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR A CC:-TREHENSIVE PER1iIT AND A VARIANCE AT 3 BROAD ST. , SALEM, page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Comprehensive Permit and the requested Variance, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1 . That all the conditions of the Salem Historical Commission be adhered to by the petitioners; 2. That the petitioners maintain not less than three (3) parking spaces on the site of the rehabilitated building, said parking to comply with all the requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance; 3. That the building be rehabilitated as per the plans submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeal; ( 4. That all the requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to i fire safety be adhered to by the petitioners; 5. That all necessary building permits and Certificates of Occupancy be obtained. COMPREHENSIVE PERMIT & VARIANCE GRANTED 1:ames M. Fleming, Esq. "71- Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK, f '=PEAL FRO" THIS DE^ISION, IF A'iy, SHALL BE MADr PURSUANT TO SEST!O!� - SE;ERAL LAK£. CH^.PTiB CDE, A4B SHALL BE ELSE' h litl �D DAYS OF THIS D-ECISION IN THE 0,.-1:E OF THE CITY CLERG. P,:G;ANT TO HASS. CElERAt L;,� CHAPTER FOS, SECT!b'; 11. THE C' "-- (-;ANTED HEREIN, SHALL N01 TA7:E EF-rE:T UNTIL A COPY OF THEo'�4 It-ATI4tl OF TH_ Cipy C:EP' p°,• ^0 !AFS>^ •."t L� .FrJ I a C; CHAT, IF S.C:j AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. TH IT n.,, - tF' D r . RE:.DRDED IN THE - c Y2 "i SGCTH ESSEX RESISTRY OF OECD' AND IN'DE'tri JN'-CR I;A;1L C. OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL k P PLANNING BOARD �,,ON CITY OF SALEM FEa 2 3 '�jAfuiMae W'�t~.. FEC",:IVED, In City Council,-------_January----- 1987 -------------------- CITY ---------------- CITYOi SfxLEM,�IASS. Ordered: That the City Council declare the property at-3-Broad Street surplus, and authorize the Mayor to sell the property to the Salm Housing Authority for $1.00. In City Council January 27, 1987 Adopted by roll call vote of 10 yeas, 0 nays, 1 absent Motion for immediate reconsideration in the hopes it would not prevail Was denied Approved by the Mayor on January 29, 1987 _J ATTEST: JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO /y`' •�\ c.c.- City Clerk, �. Building Inspector i Salem Vf storical �®rn n ifssiIon CITY HA{ .L, SALEM. MASS. 01970 - 744-4580 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction ( ) ; demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration ( ) ; painting ( ) ; sign or other appurtenant fixture ( ) work as described below in the . . . McIntire Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Property: 3 Broad Street __- Name of Record Owner: Salem Housing Authority DESCRIPTION. OF WORK PROPOSED: Replacement of 6/6 sash with 9/6 sash on all elevations (all new window openings must have lintels to match existing sandstone or may be concrete with color added) ; addition of elevator infill on left side elevation (brick color, size and joints to match existing); _ removal of fire escapes; replacement of vents on front facade with matching infill brick. s , will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: August 18,1986 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By AAAAU M �a ChairmanN THE ARCHITECTS C O L L ADBIt6 Rf"kVI V E INC. 15 September 1986 SEP S 9 01 AM IN RECEIVED CITY OR SAI.E. Ii PIASS. Mr. William Monroe Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Bill: Thank you for taking the time on Tuesday morning to review the Oliver School at 3 Broad Street. Based on our discussion I have compiled the following list of issues and actions: - Confirmed the status of the Oliver School conversion as "Group Residence", Section 424.0 State Building Code. - Elevator - The size shown does not meet State Code 431.8 requiring accommodation for stretcher (72" x 2411) in "horizontal open position". TAC to contact State Department of Public Safety, Division of Elevators. - Fire - Possible relocation of siamese connector and addition of fire hose cabinets. TAC to contact Captain Robert Turner, City of Salem Fire Marshall for preliminary review of project in preparation for comprehensive permit approval. - Egress - Enclose second floor landing of central stair. TAC to investigate additional escape route on second floor by relocating door of two bedroom unit and providing emergency door egress to porch roof. - Partitions - All walls $ ceilings at individual units will be one (1) hour construction. Dividing walls will continue full height to the bottom of existing floor construction. Ceilings of units to be 5/8" fire code "type x" drywall. Thank you again for your attention to these issues. Please contact our office if there are questions regarding the Oliver School. Sincerely, THE ARCHITECTS COLLABORATIVE, INC. Susan K. Sheldon Architect 4 6 B R A T T L E SKS:kCkhE E T , C A M B R I D G E , M A S S A C H U S E T T S 0 2 1 3 8 , U. S. A. TELEPHONE : (617) 868 - 4200 TELEX : 92 1494 T A C C A M CABLE : TACCAM U. S. A.