The URL can be used to link to this page

64-238 -STOP N SHOP Boston St, Salem & Howley St, Peabody - CONSERVATION COMMISSION ��o- o �;r 64 -238 I � _ .r _ �Tl , . "_. � ._ � Department of Community Development & Planning City of Peabody May 19, 1994 �� ' " J� �n��El�� MAY 2 0 19�� Ms. Betsy Horne, Chair Salem Conservation Commission �u�IO�TY a'1ck6iteo..„ - .,-.. 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Ms. Horne : The Peabody Conservation Commission held its monthly meeting on May 18, 1994. On the agenda for the May 18 meeting was the public hearing for the Stop & Shop Notice of Intent. During the public hearing a great deal of information was presented to the Commission, both by the public and their legal representatives. The information presented included several areas of concern for both Peabody and Salem. It is the Commissions understanding that the Stop & Shop organization has not yet filed a Notice of Intent with the City of Salem. Because this project involves two communities, the Peabody Conservation Commission would like to include the Salem Conservation Commission in all of the activity surrounding this project. Rt present there will be a visit to the Stop & Shop site on May 25, 1994 at 5 : 30 PM. The public hearing was continued to the next Conservation Commission meeting which will be held on June 8, 1994 at 7 : 00 PM in Peabody City Hall . If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 532-3000 extension 390 . Thank you. Sincerely, ��. 3� �(�-- Curt T. Bellavance, Planner DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING ` City Hall � 24 Lowell Street � Peabody, Massachusetts 01960 • (508) 532-3000 � f ,a�'�•g Cry o��,a6ody � i � �; veasoov � ,�� CONSERVATION COMMISSION � �ean�EEa �°•a,w�+'"e ciTv Hn�� °�s .,1::': —3 i`.i i I0� ! ? cm PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 07960 508-532-3000 .,. , . !„�_;.-.;-,:f'-, LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THERE WILL BE A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PEABODY CONSERVATION COMMISSION pN WEDNESDAY, JUNE .S, 1994 AT 7 :00 P. M. AT THE PEABODY CITY HALL, 24 LOWELL STREET, LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM , PEABODY, h1ASSACHUSETTS . THE AGENDA SHALL BE AS FULLOWS : 1 . Approval of Minutes for May 18 , 1994 . NOTICE OF INTENT 2 . Public Hearing for a NOI for Stop & Shop Supermarket Co . , Inc . , P . O. Box 1942 , Boston. Proposed work is for the development of a Supermarket Facility. Proposed work entails working within the 100 foot buffer zone including construction of a stormwater detention basin, grading, paving, construction of a wastewater pump station and grease trap and demolition and removal of certain buildings for the property known as ' Hoo�ley Street, Map 86 , Lots 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , & 134 in ' Peabody and Salem. OTHER 3. 8: 00 p. m. Presentation by Joann Carr of the Ipswich River Watershed Association - Nonpoint Source Pollution. 4. Request by Mr. & Mrs. Frank Terry for Inspection of property at 17 Lake St. for Release of Security Bond. , 5. Budget Report - Period Ending May 27 , 1994 . � ��' qe, �,@`' �� ,� �, �, a, . ,J t,� ,� �� Y Conservation Commission ' " " - Aqenda - June 8 , 1994 Qt. !��.., _ .. •_, `t, J-. _ ... ._ ..l�i II.! . ,_ Page 2 , . �,i_,_ i::,'. OTHER - CONTINllED 6 . Letter from Essex County Office of Regional Services : Re : II'i Task Force for Household Hazardous Waste . i 7 . Letter from Land Conservation Center - Conservation Notes. (On I, file ) . ' 8 . DEP - Nletlands Protection Initiative - 1994 - Report on File . 9 . Any other matter properly presented to the Commission at this time . 10. ADJOURNMENT. Marilyn J. Limongiello, Clerk Posted: June 3 , 1994 ` LEGAL NOTICE ��L� COPY PEABODY CONSERVATION COMMISSION �I In accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 131, li Section 40, Wetlands Protection Act as Amended by Chapter 472 of I the Acts of 1993, notice is hereby given that a Notice of Intent ' has been filed on May 31, 1994 at the Peabody City Hall, Lower Level Conference Room, 24 Lowell Street, Peabody, Massachusetts . The said Notice of Intent is the application of Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Inc. , P.O. Box 1942, Boston, MA. The proposed project is located at Howley Street in Peabody and Salem, Massachusetts, Map 86, Lots 130, 131, 132, 133 and 134 . Proposed work is for the development of a Supermarket Facility. Proposed work entails working within the 100 foot Buffer Zone including construction of a stormwater detention basin, grading, paving, construction of a wastewater pump station and grease trap and demolition and removal of certain buildings . Copies of the Notice of Intent and Plans are available for review at 24 Lowell Street, Peabody, Massachusetts at the Office of the Conservation Commission, Lower Level, City Hall . A Public Hearing on the said Notice of Intent will be held on June 8, 1994 at 7 : 00 p.m. John Marino, Secretary Conservation Commission Ad to run on Wednesday, June 1, 1994 in the Salem Evening News ' - oPp F�rw. 64-238 � � 310 CtIIt 10.99 . - � ' . (fo be ptw�ded by DEP) I ' SALEPf Form 5 Gry�c,.n Stop & Shop Supermarket C� Applca°t Co�onre�lLh of Xusaehusetta ' Order o! Coaditions Massachu�tts I��tlands Yrot�otion Act p.y. a. 13ir 540 YrOm SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION I��uinq Authority ToT.he Stop & Shon Sunerm�rkAr r.,�� Advantage Bank 25 Bairlarr u� T.';��hrop ' licant) (li�tge� of property ovaezl N Of �PP John C. e ers, 164 Boston St. , Salem, t c/o S�ra�ini, Serafini and Darling Addr��s 63 Federal St Sal Pm *re I�ddr��'argaret Buck1 v � �1 � n�o� R�.,a Ry�,,,;� _��' Thi• ord�z is iuuad and�deliv�r�d at followss ��_� � by hand dolivary to applicant or raprs��ntative on (1�rnhPr /� iooS (dat�) ❑ by eertifiad mail, return reeeipt raqua�ted on {dab►�: xhi• projaet ia located at Boston Street Salem MA -nci u i `�===T—==--'^^dy, IL Tho proporty ie reeosded at the Ragistry oE Essex South 800k 11223 882 Page 171�431 , 114,380 Caztificate (if registered) N/A . 2he Notiee of Intent for thie projeet wae filed on Hav 26 1995 (data) The publia hoarinq vas cloaed on September 14, 1995 (d+ie1 Fiadiag• . . Th� ('oi^miccin _ Ms rwiwd tM �bov�'ref�r�ne�d MoNce ofCommission� �thtM� hdd � p�blic ha�irq on tM prolKt• on� � tM Sniorstim �wil�ble to th� � �rk is [o Ottlor-�is . . . ti�, tl�e Co�tission hu d�t�r*irrd t��t th� �n� on rhieA th� P�� fiynlHe�nt to tM follorirp inc�rnts in �ceordr�e� �ith th� VrNuipHa+s of StOnificuic� s�c torM in tM � rpulKiau fer e�cA Are� f�ject to Vroteeiion Urd�r tM Act (ch�ek n apprapri�t�): . � G�� W�r�s�lYY � y`��v°f pofllution � irotKtio^'of Y1ldllfeiX�b/t�t Tot�l fillnp fe� ttbStted 5595 00 St�tt Sh�re $z50.00 � � . �1/2 fee in eaees� of f25) [1tY/ian Sh.ro $275.00 . dty/Twn iortion t SUte Portio� � TOLI Refird Oue f C1R totd) � ft/2 totaU Effective 11/10/89 5-1 I . I • 11. upon completion of the vork deacribed herein, the applicant shall forthwith requeat in writing that a Certificate of compliance be isaued statinq that the Wozk has been eatiataetorily completed. 12. The vork ehall conform to the following plane and epecial conditione: , Ylan�i Title Dated 5lqned and Stampad by: on File vith: 1."Proposed Planned Unit Develonment 'n P h ' � � �-' "" f oo upermar et Co and Jef ers um er Corp. ,�sh�eets 1-17, prepared by Eastern Land Survev Assoc' . , 104 Lowell 4trPar_ PAab ��-.,�`'��:9 . s ampe y C ristopher Mello, P.L,S. and Clayton Morin, PE. Plans dated June 15 1993 revised G/Z/9� z �� OS a' �"1e '"� " on f with the 2�m Co st�1rtS'sion; One Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970. 2. F.esource Area Delineation Plans and � � �"" ' - p ommer ^nv. *+A and Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. , dated 5/3/94, si ned and stamped by ��i _._; ?fello, PLS and Clay.top Morin,EE. �dl�si��t�� A-C � On file with the C. special Conaitions �us� � n�� I '�Piii:.:_. See attached Special Conditions !,`64-238 containing 21 Special Conditions, {Laave Spaee Blank) . _. . . . ..��' '. ,: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . '.'a�:w;ki*`:i 5-3A I� i ; � .. � � o ti � � � ? i�� p -, � � � � O tr � ,�p' m � � � w � � w � � .-w� r A c�� A s i A : N A L • � M � \ a n a m n° �. � a $� �a 3 � Y 9 : :»�� a . � a "m �e � 3 d , � � dE _g,35 � � ,. ^ ,�� n _ 3 � g 4 � 3S r .- °1 a � s a � �e�� ,: �� .i �� ' a I� A N � MyAM � +' . ' " a o :; g� �S� a ;; a• � m �0 3 » � �dfi �$. n rf s # a . � � „ ; � e , p. a \ � � �� ] � n n w n o �' ' *{ Y• \ M � � ` n � � �w�y � ft ` P4 n O. ( � » ,. ; � ' » a ' o =G � � � �D K a �" . � � w 'j n w :f � � �.�� j • • ``j O( O M � p � � . .�. 3 O ' .�i r•[a �= •: � _ � � V] ' � • n n w � . . k� N. h 3 3 " R w ., '�; .. 3 • P; �,' N � I � i ! �a � ~i � ° 2q ,� •�, p� �, p �. „ L �� i o� � 7 • 7 ° o , Q. 4 � - � So . a� 'Y : p�d ° n I � 3 9 » .�. i � .M.o �' �� a, Q �� n N �' ti � `� � ': ; a i S • '� �� ' y � A "s � ' a, -.a » �.o � ^ o � � .. » � a $ s� $�s�� M M g � , • . Q . , � � � ;�. �i � w o < � � Bn �Q��.• � �1 + .� � O ' : ; ' o » _ :04�<3 r- : • n C. � g � '' �� " �°. g i r; � � � ' : L � � 5 »�� i o �J' � : -�y » » ,� • 3 9 g ' .. o.. � � y �} � � - `" � m s �i + �.iwa�-- 0.' .� A ry e ii � w �a • ,� • O rpY i , t p 3 ' " �' 'R �a M Q' m � � o ,. M =.� � �� m H. 0 n » .y n � � • • A �1 —_ � � � ; $�� a �� 6 0 � ° � ,. » __ ° ^ 3 3 :' �: � ;a 3 g �• �. $ L� " ,� � � J U A M� • m M ' �' � A Q 0 r• '. � � q� �� ^.� ;� :.� N O r. � ^ �� S � � � � �' � � 3�� i> � s i � t�l 't,� " p�' S � � � , � � a w � � S �':�� ,�1', • \ � \ i 1 " '� � f. I 1 1`: , _ \\V� CQ� � ! . `1�. 1�i ? {-� �I15�'V�1�Il C.r(l�ri1IT11SS10I1 . z ; � ,�� Salrm. Ma�sachuccits 01970 � wW I �y.t7.lssnc��`'. Stop and Shop #64-238 Special Condi+�ons 1. All work shall conform to the above-reff :r_aed .�tice of Intent(NOI), site plan and supporting documents and those final s :;.ific�.ions which shall be filed with the Commission prior to construction. Any change made or intended to be made to the approved plans shall require the applicant to inquire of the Commission in wtiting whether the chan�e is substantial enough to require the filing of a new Notice Of Intent (NOI). 2. Members and a�ents of the Commission shall have the right to enter and inspect the premises at all reasonable times to evaluate compliance wiih the conditions in this Order. The Commission may require the applicant to submit additional data or information necessary for the Commission to conduct that evaluation. 3. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall submit, with the request for a Certificate of Compliance, an affidavit, prepazed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, stating that the site has been developed, in accordance with the requirements of this Order of Conditions, the referenced site plan and supporting documents. 4. This Order shall apply to every successor in control or successor in interest of the property described in the Notice of Intent and accompanying plans or part thereo£ In the event this land or any part thereof changes ownership before or during construction, the current owner shall notify the new owner, by registered mail, of this Order prior to the transfer of ownership and shall forward proof of this notification to the Commission. �. Prior to commencement of construction activity, a haybale and silt fence barrier shall be placed downgradient of construction to prevent siltation to the adjacent wetland. Haybales shall be anchored with stakes and entrenched 4 to 6 inches in depth. Trench material shall be deposited on the upgradient side of the haybale barrier. Haybales shall be inspected daily; those showing signs of deterioration shall be replaced immediately. The haybale and silt fence bamer shall remain in proper functioning condition until all disturbed areas have been stabilized. 6. Additional erosion and sedimentation control measures deemed necessary by the Commission shall be instituted by the applicant. Any siltation caused onto any wetland I or waterway area shall be promptly reported to the Commission. Such azeas shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Commission. : 7. During construction, no debris, fill, or excavated material shall be stockpiled within 100 feet of designated wetlands. Any other stockpile location will be protected sufficient to prevent sediment from surface runoff entering wetlands. 8. All catch basins and pipes shall be fitted with oil and gas traps. A regulaz cleaning and structural maintenance schedule for catch basins, manholes, and pipes shall be developed and submitted for Conservation Commission approval. 9. * All catch basins, manholes, and pipes shall be cleaned four (4) times per year in December, Mazch, May and September. Certificates of Inspection shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission within 15 days of such cleaning. ]0. Notice shall be given to this Commission no more than 2 weeks nor less than 2 days prior to the initial start-up of construction activities. Said notice shall include, in writing, the name(s), address(es), and business and home telephone numbers of the project supervisor(s) responsible for insuring that operations aze conducted in compliance with this Order. 11. * Minimal pnuung and no removal of any buffer zone or wetland vegetation wili occur downgradient of the staked haybale line. 12. All disturbed soils shall be immediately and similazly re-vegetated upon completion of construction activities or shall be mulched until the next growing season. Hydroseeding will be initiated no later than September 15. 13. * Fertilizers used for landscaping and lawn caze shall contain a low nitrogen content and be used in moderation. Pesticides and herbicides shall not be used within 100 feet of the resource azea. 14. A plan for landscaping and maintenance of vegetation for the buffer zone shall be developed and submitted for Conservation Commission approval prior to commencement . of work. 15. *T'he Applicant shall sweep the pazking lot four(4)rimes/week, weather permitting. 16. *"fhere shall be no storage of rock sait or sand on the site. 17. *Lower sodium de-icing chemicals shall be used on all paved surfaces. ,I U • 18. All erosion control measures and drainage structures shall be in place prior to the paving of the pazking lot. 19. T'he Applicant shall submit a construction timetable to the Conservation Commission for their written approval ninety (90) days prior to commencement of construction. 20. *The Applicant shall manually clean debris from the North River Canal, for the entire length of its propem�. The clean-up shall be done from outside the bank of the river. No heavy equipment shall enter on the bank. Such cleaning shall be repeated annually, in perpetuity, with notice of said cleaning to be provided to the City of Salem Planning Department. All obvious debris shall be removed immediately. 21. *The Applicant shall pick-up litter and trash along the river, from its property line to the property owned by Salem Oil and Grease, provided that permission is granted by the private property owners. Such clean-up shall be repeated annually, with notice of the dates of clean-up to be provided to the Salem Planning Department fourteen(14) days in advance of the clean-up date. Stop and Shop shail not be liable or responsible for the clean-up of any materials dumped on these private properties nor shall Stop and Shop be responsible for or required to remove any debris which may be hazardous or require special disposal or clean-up pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws. *Ongoing conditions that do not expire upon issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. jm\bdstogshop.con ``,��ON Cp�� . � y ��i�, •(�'� • • ? � V11 2 ., ,�' Sulrm. Massachucetts (11970 �� M.,tisr�� Stop and Shop Howley Street DEP File#64-238 Ongoing Special Conditions 9. * All catch basins, manholes, and pipes shall be cleaned four (4) times per year in December, Mazch, May and September. Certificates of Inspection shall be submitted to the Conservation Commission within 15 days of such cleaning. 11. * Minimal pruning and no removal of any buffer zone or wetland vegetation will occur downgradient of the staked haybale line. 13. * Fertilizers used for landscaping and lawn care sha11 contain a low nitrogen content and be used in moderation. Pesticides and herbicides shall not be used within 100 feet of the resource area. 15. *The Applicant shall sweep the parking lot four (4)times/week, weather permitting. , 16. *There shall be no storage of rock salt or sand on the site. I 17. *Lower sodium de-icing chemicals shall be used on all paved surfaces. � 20. *The Applicant shall manually clean debris from the North River Canal, far the entire length of its property. The clean-up shall be done from outside the bank of the river. No heavy equipment shall enter on the bank. Such cleaning sha11 be repeated annually, in perpetuity, with notice of said cleaning to be provided to the Ciry of Salem Planning Department. All obvious debris shall be removed immediately. 21. *The Applicant shall pick-up littec and trash along the river, from its property line to the property owned by Salem Oil and Grease,provided that permission is granted by the private property owners. Such clean-up shall be repeated annually, with notice of the dates of clean-up to be provided to the Salem Planning Department fourteen (14) days in advance of the clean-up date. Stop and Shop shall not be liable or responsible for the clean-up of any materials dumped on these private properties nor shall Stop and Shop be responsible for or required to remove any debris which may be hazazdous or require special disposal or clean-up pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws. *Ongoing conditions that do not expire upon issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. \\UN Cp�� .. �.; �i ? �Z CQ�15�e2'V'd�1011 CO1111111SS1U�I1 � �, ,�' Salrm. Ma�sachu4cits 1)1970 W �� h ' Hnssn� MEMO To: Robert Ledoux, City Solicitor From: Stephen Dibble, Assistant Plann Subject: Conservation Commission / Stop op Supermarket Date: December 11, 1996 I recently received the enclosed Order to Show Cause and Prehearing Conference Report for the Peabody/Salem line Stop & Shop Supermarket project. This is a project the Mayor wants to go forward and the Conservation Commission approved with conditions, but is being appealed by neighbors. Please advise as to how the City should proceed in this matter. Thank you for your immediate assistance. ConcomVedoux .. � COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS - EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIItS DEPARTMENT OF ENVII20NMENTAL PROTEC��N��s�q ONE MN1'ER STREET, BOSTON MA 02108 (617)292-5500 �i3EC 1 0 1996 WILLIAM F.WELD TRUDY COXE Governor ��'d��lii�� Ek�an��0� �'�'��"Secretary ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI DAVID B. STRUHS Lt. Governor Coavnissioaer December 5, 1996 In the Matter of Docket No. 96-085 File No. 55-369 (Peabody) STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET CO. , INC. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On October 25, 1996, I ordered the parties to this wetlands appeal to appear, on pain of dismissal, at a prehearing conference on December 4 , 1996 . The Peabody Conservation Commission neither appeared nor sent word to explain its absence at the conference . In order to ensure the predictability and regularity of any further proceedings in this case, it is essential to clarify the identity of all parties . Accordingly the Peabody Conservation Commission is ORDERED to show cause why it should not be dismissed as a party pursuant to 310 CMR 1 . 01 (9) (c) 2 (1995 rev. ) . The Conservation Commission' s response, if any, must be postmarked by December 20 , 1996 . If no such statement is filed and served within the time specified above, the Conservation Commission will be dismissed as a party to this case and its rights to participate as a party in � CI Pnntid on Recycled Paper -2- this matter will be terminated. ,� '/ James P. Roon y v Administrati w Judge oscccp.stp . . . . . . � COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHiJSETTS ... - EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFA�RS��=��'��`� nErnx�xT oF Exvmorrn�rrr�,i, Pxo�cTT�C 1 0 1996 ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON MA 02108 (617) 292-5500 � CT.-B•� .>w�V�'Yy Y'u�iW:t:.�a°� `6Y�c:�a.- WII.LIAM F.WELD . TRUDY COXE Governor Secretary ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI - DAVID B. STRUHS Lt. Gwernor Coxnmisaioner December 5 , 1996 In the Matter of Docket No . 96-085 File No. 64-238 (Salem) STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET CO. , INC. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On October 25, 1996 , I ordered the parties to this wetlands appeal to appear, on pain of dismissal, at a prehearing conference on December 4, 1996 . The Salem Conservation Commission neither appeared nor sent word to explain its absence at the conference . � In order to ensure the predictability and regularity of any further roceedin s in this case, it is essential to clarif the P 4 Y identity of all parties . Accordingly the Sa1em Conservation Commission is ORDERED to show cause why it should not be dismissed as a party pursuant to 310 CMR 1 . 01 (9) (c) 2 (1995 rev. ) . The Conservation Commission' s response, if any, must be postmarked by December 20 , 1996 . If no such statement is filed and served within the time specified above, the Conservation Commission will be dismissed as a party to this case and its rights to participate as a party in � ►�� Printed on Recycled Paper SERVICE LIST In Re : Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Inc . Docket No. 96-085 File Nos . 55-369 and 64-238 Representative Partv Robert C. Davis, Esq. APPLICANT Leonard H. Frieman, Esq. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Kevin O' Flaherty, Esq. , Inc . Goulston & Storrs, P.C. 400 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02110-3333 William R. DiMento, Esq. PETITIONER/ABUTTER DiMento & DiMento Hoang Tri Lam 990 Paradise Road - Suite 3E Swampscott, MA 01907-1309 Peabody Conservation Commission CONSERVATION COMMISSION City Hall - 24 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 , Salem Conservation Commission CONSERVATION COMMISSION 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Maril n S . Levenson, Es . DEPARTMENT Y 4 DEP - Office of General Counsel Dept . of Environmental One Winter Street - 3rd Floor Protection Boston, MA 02108 cc : Rachel Freed DEP - Northeast Regional Office 10 Commerce Way Woburn, MA 01801 date : December 5 , 1996 2_ this matter will be terminated. James P. Roon Administratiue Law Judge oscccs.stp SERVICE LIST , In Re : Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Inc . Docket No . 96-085 File Nos . 55-369 and 64-238 Representative partv Robert C. Davis, Esq. APPLICANT Leonard H. Frieman, Esq. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Kevin O ' Flaherty, Esq. Inc . Goulston & Storrs, P.C. 400 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02110-3333 William R. DiMento, Esq. PETITIONER/ABUTTER DiMento & DiMento Hoang Tri Lam 990 Paradise Road - Suite 3E Swampscott, MA 01907-1309 Peabody Conservation Commission CONSERVATION COMMISSION City Hall - 24 Lowell Street I Peabody, MA 01960 Salem Conservation Commission CONSERVATION COMMISSION 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Marilyn S . Levenson, Esq. DEPARTMENT DEP - Office of General Counsel Dept . of Environmental One Winter Street - 3rd Floor Protection Boston, MA 02108 cc : Rachel Freed DEP - Northeast Regional Office 10 Commerce Way Woburn, MA 01801 date : December 5 , 1996 � COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ii�&p,�c�se;Iev�, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFn� DErnx�r oF Erivmorrn�xTni. Pxo�cTToiv�C 1 C 1996 � ONE WINTER 3TREET, BOSTON MA 02108 (617) 292-5500�,r v�:.viie�� i c:..�.:....J n.:..�... W�T T TAM F. R'ELD TRUDY COXE Governor Secretary ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI � DAVID B. STRUHS Lt. Goveraor Cammissioner DATE: December 5, 1996 In the Matter of Docket No. • 96-085 File Nos . 55-369 (Peabody) and STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET CO. , 64-238 (Salem) INC. PREHEARING CONFERENCE REPORT APPEAL BY Petitioner (s) : Hoang Tri Lam ' TYPE OF APPEAL: X Wetlands _Waterways _Water Pollution _Air Quality _Haz .Waste _Solid Waste _Waste Site Cleanup _Water Supply Other: X PERMIT denied / issued by Dept . on October 17, 1995 to Stop & Shop Supermarket Co . Inc . X Superseding Order _Superseding Determ. of Applicability _License _Discharge Permit _Other: _ENFORCEMENT ORDER issued by Dept . on to _PENALTY ($ ) issued by Dept . on to OTHER: PREHEARING CONFERENCE HELD ON December 4 , 1996 at the Department of Environmental Protection, 1 Winter St . , Boston, Massachusetts, before James P. Rooney, Administrative Law Judge . � ��Pnn[ed on Rerycled Paper _2_ PARTIES AND REPRESENTATIVES: see attached Service List . PREHEARING CONFERENCE (PHC) : Appearancea : X Attendance list signed and attached. All parties appeared at PHC. X No appearance at PHC by following party or parties (an appropriate Order will follow) : Peabody and Salem Conservation Commissions Compliance With Prehearing Conference Order: Informal settlement-related discussions prior to PHC. . . . . . . all parties Written statement of issues served/filed prior to PHC. . . . . . all parties Witness list served/filed prior to PHC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . all parties Applicant served/filed new or altered project plans . . . . . . . . . . N/A Dept . gave petitioner written explanation of penalty calculation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A Written statement (s) of Dept . policy/guidance exchanged at or before PHC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A Factfinder/Alternative Dispute Resolution Disputed issues referred to factfinder [310 CMR 1 . 01 (13) (i) ] ? X No . Yes (an Order of Reference will follow) . Factfinder agreed-to by parties : Issues referred to factfinder : Appeal referred to ADR information session [310 CMR 1 . 01 (9) (c) l .g] ? X No. _ ADR already scheduled. Yes : -3- PREHEARING PROCEEDINGS: Motions [310 CMR 1 . 01 (11) ] : X No motions pending. X Any further motions per attached Scheduling Order. _Motions pending, to be decided: by Petitioner (s) : by Department : by Other: Discovery [310 CMR 1 . 01 (12) (a) - (e) ] : X No discovery outstanding. X No discovery requested at PHC. _Discovery to proceed per attached Scheduling Order. Prefiled Testimony [310 CMR 1 . 01 (12) (f) (1995 rev. ) ] : X Prefiled written direct testimony (original + 1 copy) to be filed and served per attached Scheduling Order. X Prefiled written rebuttal testimony (original + 1 copy) to be filed and served per attached Scheduling Order. No prefiled direct testimony. _No prefiled rebuttal testimony. , LIMITATIONS ON WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS (Testimony, Motions, Memoranda) [310 CMR 1 . 01 (13) (e) -- modifiable on request for good cause shown] : 15 pages, double-spaced. If typed, no smaller than 12 pt type, exclusive of caption and exhibits (if any) . -4- DISPOSITION OF APPEAL: _APPEAL SETTLED. The written settlement agreement signed by all parties, with all attachments (e•Q• , wetlands Final Order of Conditions, or other final permit/license) , together with a joint motion for issuance by Department of a Final Decision approving the settlement and dismissing the appeal in accordance with the settlement agreement, sha11 be filed by the following date : X ADJUDICATORY HEARING SCHEDULED as follows (at DEP, 1 Winter St . , Boston, unless otherwise stated) : Date Time Conference Room April 1, 2 , and 3 10 : 00 a.m. 6th floor _SIMPLIFIED HEARING ELECTED per 310 CMR 1 . 01 (8) (a) and SCHEDULED as follows (at DEP, 1 Winter St . , Boston, unless otherwise stated) : _Simplified Hearing Form signed by all parties . _Stenographic transcription of hearing to be provided by the following party, per 310 CMR 1 . 01 (13) (m) (1995 rev. ) : _See attached Orders . ANY PARTY WHICH FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER (INCLUDING ANY ATTACHED ORDERS AND SCHEDULES) MAY BE SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS, INCLUDING, WHERE APPROPRIATE, DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION [310 CMR 1 . 01 (10) ] OR PRECLUSION. /.. / ., 9� James P. Rooney Administrati�e yaw Judge -5 0.,;- Matter of Stop & Shoo Supermarket Co. Inc . , Docket No. 96-085 ATTENDANCE LIST FOR PREHEARING CONFERENCE NAME/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE/FAX: ' REPRESENTING OR WITH: Name : /,v . J n fa � i �� f!1 �>1L1�� r Address : � r' -, `-' Tele# : /;,�] - , � Fax# : ��- � Y � ,��/'i \ . /{�f Name : /� I / / ��/L ' Address • � S � Tele# : L• /� - s 9;�- ,�5 P C Fax# : N17 - S�� <- a-c yv � Name : �n�r�Skcw`cuSk�� - �j1k� ��nc. �,w�se•nl,:,, . AddTess : V�k(5'i 10\ V,�o.\v�,,,f 5� S�-�,•n � S �,n ��1T��-o,,..�.+ sv�A 022Z� Te1e# : b�Z- aL�F-l`i'1p Fax# : b�'�- 9 Z4 - Z.2$6 Name : J?�Lb�i ( ,Jfoui�vA,crJ �x�r,,ur�tf r�i,2 S�aG�Sr,�v Address : VH-(3� iN[. l0/ !1/A�G K U� .57F8(cLf W,Hb'7QTp,�an� µf- oZZ92 Tele# : (,,i7- 92%•/770 � Fax# : Gi7• 92Y - z2bG Name": /'�/G/�9�Z /✓]�iY/G/1'1� Address : o T ST• Q�i � �'/ . , Tele# : �iQ- ��o- � o Fax# : �i9' 7%G � �00 6 - Name : Address : Te1e# : Fax# : -sb- Matter of Stop & ShoA Supermarket Co. Inc . , Docket No. 96-085 ATTENDANCE LIST FOR PREHEARING CONFERENCE NAME/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE/FAX: REPRESENTING OR WITH: Name • � 6.,,-F-�� Address : �Fco �� /�� - ...r_s� Hi�F � Tele# : b/� � � -� � 76 Fax# : i1 � s�`l- ��L Name : .L%2v�n �' D 'F��/�t�, �55 Address: .ynm Af/c,_„ ��c yP T ,�c�� 'r �s✓�v - 3 3� Tele : Fax# : �i_�rr y- NI/2. Name • � �/ Addre s : 6� @lU Tele : Fax : Name • r� L Address : 1 L ,� � � � sr�r � �d zn.. 1v ^ �c. Tele : - (a — Fax# : Le t 7 - 3Y - SS I � Name : RQr�1G� �i'Y� Address : .D n✓� 1 rD 0 L �iob�m, M�a o/� 0% Tele# : (�/� / 93� ��83 Fax#�� 93} �3(�/� Name : M� ��l�l�t�t-1 Address : /v �..� f/liti.. 0212 L Tele# : G11- 5'24- It]n Fax# : Gi1 - 414 T.Lg � -6- Matter of Stop & Shoo Supermarket Co. Inc . , Docket No. 96-OSS SCHEDULING ORDER This Order is an attachment to the Prehearing Conference Report dated December 5, 1996 : The parties shall comply with the following schedule : Event Bv or before 5 p .m. on Deadline for filing motion to intervene or artici ate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Januar 3 1997 P P Y , Motions to dismiss and/or for summary decision, if any, to be filed and served. . . . . January 24 , 1997 Petitioner to file and serve its prefiled direct testimony, including all exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 7, 1997 Other parties, including the Department, to file and serve their respective prefiled direct and rebuttal testimony, including all exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 21, 1997 Prefiled rebuttal testimony (if any) to be filed and served by Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 13 , 1997 Motions for directed decision/dismissal for failure to sustain direct case (if any) , and/or motions to strike prefiled testimony (if any) to be filed and served by any party. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 19 , 1997 Final Hearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 1, 2 , and 3 , 1997 � PARTIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR� TIMING ANY FURTHER MOTIONS OR REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY SO AS TO ALLOW FOR THE COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND THE DECISION OF MOTIONS SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE OF THE ADJUDICATORY HEARING. � Matter of Stop & ShoA Supermarket Co. Inc . , Docket No. 96-085 ORDER re ISSUES TO BE ADJUDICATED This Order is an attachment to the Prehearing Conference Report dated December 5 , 1997 : _The parties shall file a written stipulation of uncontested/undisputed facts/issues on or before : _The issues to be adjudicated are as stated in the written statement of issues served and filed by the following party: X The issues to be adjudicated are as follows : 1 . Is the proposed stormwater management system adequate to prevent runoff from the project (including oil or gas in the runoff) entering the North River and impairing with respect to either bank or land under water body: a) ground water and surface water quality; b) the capacity of the resource area to provide breeding habitat, escape cover and food for fisheries; or c) the capacity of the resource area to provide important wildlife habitat functions? 310 CMR 10 . 54 (4) (a) 3 , 4 and 5 and 10 . 56 (4) (a) 2 , 3 and 4 . 2 . Is the stormwater management system adequate to prevent pollution from entering into wildlife habitat area and impairing its capacity to perform important wildlife habitat functions? 310 CMR 10 . 57 (4) (a) 3 . 3 . Does the Superseding Order adequately address the affects of surface water runoff from the lumberyard on the resource areas at the site, namely bordering land subject to flooding, bank, and land under water body? -8- Matter of Stoo & Shop Supermarket Co. Inc. , Docket No. 96-OSS ORDER re WITNESSES This Order is an attachment to the Prehearing Conference Report dated December 5, 1997 : The expected witnesses for the respective parties, whose testimony will be prefiled unless otherwise indicated below, and the expected area (s) of their testimony, are : For the oetitioner: Raymond W. Talkington, PhD. , P.G. , LSP Hoang Tri Lam (abutter) Joan Sweeney (abutter) For the DeAartment : Rachel Freed For the applicant : Steven Chouinard, P .E. Charles J. Katuska, P.W.S. Michael E . McNeice, P.E. The parties and their authorized representatives are forewarned to expect time limitations on their cross and redirect examination of witnesses and, therefore, to plan their cross and redirect examination and a time budget for them in advance of the live portion of the adjudicatory hearing. SERVICE LIST In Re : Stop & ShoA Supermarket Co. , Inc . Docket No. 96-085 File Nos . 55-369 and 64-238 ReAresentative Partv , Robert C. Davis, Esq. APPLICANT Leonard H. Frieman, Esq. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co . , ' Kevin O 'Flaherty, Esq. Inc . Goulston & Storrs, P. C. 400 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02110-3333 William R. DiMento, Esq. PETITIONER/ABUTTER DiMento & DiMento Hoang Tri Lam 990 Paradise Road - Suite 3E Swampscott, MA 01907-1309 Peabody Conservation Commission CONSERVATION COMMISSION ' City Hall - 24 Lowell Street Peabody, MA 01960 Sa1em Conservation Commission CONSERVATION COMMISSION 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Marilyn S . Levenson, Esq. DEPARTMENT DEP - Office of General Counsel Dept . of Environmental One Winter Street - 3rd Floor Protection Boston, MA 02108 cc : Rachel Freed DEP - Northeast Regional Office 10 Commerce Way Woburn, MA 01801 date : December 5 , 1996 1 �`� � z3� {� � � COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAI.PROTECTION ONE R'INTER BTREET,BOSTON MA 02108 (617)292-5500 AR.GEO PAUL CELLUCCI .p„ ,�,�y�^ 7� '� � � - TRUDY COXE �� .�s� � �� , QC7 � 1 iJJU . DAVIDB.��3 " �.Y.Y��,,�;�pept� October 15, 1998 �~,�.�.�.;i , Daniel Padien VHB PO B�x 9151 Watertown, MA 02272 RE: Waterways License Application No. W97-8790-N Stop and Shop, Peabody and Salem Dear Mr. Padien: Enclosed is the Written Determination iesued pursuant to MGL Chapter 91 for the referenced application. The proposed retail center will assist in revitalizing this section of the North River Canal while at the same time providing public waterfront access opportunities . This decision has a 21-day appeal period. Any appeals must be filed in accordance with Section VII of the Determination, Notice � of Appeal Rights . If you have any questions, please contact me at (617) 292-5946 or Tom Maguire of the Waterways Program at (617) 292-5602 . Sincerely, � �7 � � � Pamela D. Ha� Program Manager wetlanda and Waterways cc : Mayor, City of Peabody ' Mayor, City. of Salem Peabody Planning Board and Conservation Commission Salem Planning Board and Conaervation Commisaion DEP NERO . _.. \ 4. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTNE OFFICE OF ENVII20NMENTAL AFFAIRS � DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION � ONE VJINTER BTREET,BOSTON MA 02108 (617)292-5500 ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI � � TRUDY COXE Governor � 3ecretary . . � � DAVID B. STRUH9 � Commiaeioaer DIVISION OF WAT8RSH8D MANAGEMBNT WATERWAYS REGULATION PROGRAM DETERMINATION FOR ISSUANCE OF A WATERWAYS LICENSE FOR A NONWATER-DEPENDENT USE OF TIDELANllS PURSUANT TO M.G.L. C. 91 AND 310 C.M.R. 9 . 00 I. PROJECT REFERENCS: Parking Lot, Outfall, and Utilitiea by the Stop and Shop Supermarket Co. on filled tidelands of the North River, Peabody and Salem Waterwaya Application No. W97-8790-N II. PROJSCT DESCRIPTION: The Stop and Shop Supermarket Company (hereinafter the "Applicant" ) requests authorization purauant to M.G.L. Chapter 91 and 310 CMR 9 . 00 to construct and maintain a parking lot, utilitiea, and outfall in connection with the development of a supermarket . The request for authorization includes the following components : • to undertake any necessary site remediation activities; • to construct and maintain a 6, 700 aquare foot portion of a parking lot (approximately 17 spaces) and site drive with associated landscaping; • to construct and maintain a atormwater outfall; and • to construct and maintain water pipes, gas pipes, catch basins, manholes, and atormwater drainage pipes. The Department of Environmental Protection Waterways Regulation Program (hereinafter "the Department") has jurisdiction over the proposed project because it constitutes a structural alteration of previously authorized filled private tidelands of the North River. III. . .PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed project is located at li Howley Street on a 6 . 87 acre .site in the Cities of Peabody and Salem. The site is bounded on the north by the B&M Railroad Tracks, on the east by a number of residences, on the south by the Old South Burying Ground, Boston Street in Salem, and Main � ; • ' Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N Written Determination ; Page 2 Street in Peabody, and on the west by Howley Street . The North River Canal is located on the opposite side of the B&M Railroad Tracks, presently used by MBTA north shore commuter trains : SV. DSPARTMENT• S DETTRMINATION OF WATBR DSPENDENCY: The Department has determined that the proposed uae of flowed private tidelands for an outfall and filled private tidelanda for site remediation and conveyance of stormwater are water-dependent uses. The proposed use of filled private tidelanda for accesaory supermarket parking, and the conveyance of potable water and gas are nonwater-dependent uses pureuant to 310 CMR 9 . 12 (4) . Given the project does not consist entirely of water-dependent uses, the Department has processed the application as a nonwater- dependent use proiect . V. DTsPARTMENT' S StJMMARY A) Ch�ter 91 Licensina History The Department' s historical plans and Chapter 91 Waterways licensing records show that the aite conaiats of previously authorized filleci private tidelands . One Waterways authorization authorized the fill on the site according to the Department' s records . The earliest, most reliable, natural mean high water ahorelines for this portion of the river are depicted on the plan entitled ��Essex Railroad Company Plan, Salem, MA, " circa 1847 . Based on review of this plan, the North River extended into the northeast corner of the site approximately 100 feet landward of the existing mean high water shoreline. The original low water line has not been determined due to a lack of reliable data, however, based on review of historical plans and prior waterways authorizations on file with the Department, the site is assumed to be landward of the historic mean low water shoreline. Therefore, a 6, 700 square foot portion of the aite has been determined to be on filled private cideiands . The first alterations to the shoreline at the site may have occurred in 1634 when a tidal grist mill was constructed near what is now Goodhue Street in Salem. Chapter 79 of the Acts of 1846 authorized the placement of fill along the North River (including the aite) for railroad purposes. The North River was subsequently channelized by the City of Salem (see c. 148 of the Acts of 1879, c. 213 of the Acts of 1881, and c. 185 of the Acta of 1883 , ) and the Massachuaetts Department of Public Worka, and this section is now known as the North River Canal . The referenced information proved sufficient for the Department - to make a. site specific determination with respect to historic tidelands. Additional information is on file with the Department . Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N � Written Determination Page 3 � � B MEPA Review ) The proposed project has been subject to review pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) as EOSA File Number 9597 . An Environmental Notification Form for the proposed , ro 'ect was noticed in the Environmental Monitor on Se tember e, P ] P 1993 . The Waterways Regulation Program notified the Applicant on November 12, 1993, after review of the ENF, that a c. 91 license would be required, submitted written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on November 15, 1995, and no comments on the Final EIR. The Secretary of Environmental Affairs determined that the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) properly complied with MEPA in the Certificate issued on May 31; 1996 . The Department commented during the MEPA procesa that the project should be designed to be compatible with the waterfront and provide interconnected walkways to further the public righta within tidelands. Appropriate project modifications were made by the Applicanta in the FEIR and incorporated into the final design. • The Department' s comments on the MEPA 'review are on file with the Department and the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs . C) Public Notice and HearinQ The Applicants were notified that the public hearing on the proposed project was scheduled to be held on June 16, 1997 at 3 : 00 p.m. in the Peabody City Hall, in Peabody. Notice of the license application and public hearing was published by the Applicant on June 9, 1997 in the Salem News on both the Peabody and Salem pages. This notice was also published by the Department in the Environmental Monitor on June 11, 1997. The public hearing was attended by representatives of the Applicant, several local resi.dents, end their attorneys. After a brief introduction by the Department, Charlea Kutuska, one of the Applicant' s representatives, described the project, the extent of tidelands on the site, the public benefits being offered to offset the detriments, and the propoaed drainage syatem. At the close of the presentation, the local residents present asked several questiona about the effect of the project on the North River Canal and wildlife. The specific questions were about the .contaminants on the aite, the remediation plan, flooding (the site ie located within a 100-year floodplain) , ;and, stormwater management, including the outfall . No testimony was presented,� No written comments were received during the public comment period. Exhibits submitted during the hearing are on file with the Department . ; . Wate'rways Application No. W97-8790-N Written Determination � Page 4 D) Other Anprovals The Peabody Conservation Commission issued an Order of Conditions (OOC) conditionally approving the proposed project (DEP File Number 55-369) . The Salem Conservation Commission also issued an OOC conditionally approving the proposed project (DEP File Number � 64-238) . Those Ordera were appealed to the Department. On Auguat 6, 1996, the Department isaued a Superseding Order of Conditions (SOC) approving the project, which was appealed. A settlement agreement was reached between the partiea to resolve the appeal issues, which resulted in a Final Decision being issued by the Department on August 25, 1997 (Docket No. 96-085) . VI. DEPARTMENT'S DETERMINATION PURSUAN'P TO CHAPTBR 91 A) Proper Public Puroose The Department has determined that the proposed nonwater- dependent uae project on filled and flowed private tidelands serves a proper public purpose which providea greater public benefit than detriment to the public' s righta in said tidelands. Upon review, the Department has determined that the project complies with the standards for conserving and utilizing the capacity of the site to accommodate water-dependent use in accordance with Lhe applicable provisiona of 310 CMR 9.51-9 .52 . Furthermore, no overriding detriment to a public interest has been identified to overcome the presumption that the project serves a propsr public purpose in accordance with 310 CMR 9 .3L(3) . The project involves the construction of an approximately 63, 000 square foot supermarket, parking lots, and associated utilities on a 6 . 87 acre site . Contaminants on the site will be remediated to protect the public health and adjacent waterways. Pedestrian _ access to and through the site will be provided. Landscaping will be provided along the entire perimeter of the site, including the area adjacent to the new walkways and the railroad tracks (closest point of the site to the canal) . The facade of the ' supermarket will be designed to be compatible with the canal. Substantially more open apace than what is required by the Waterways regulationa will be provided, and the propoaed aite layout will provide views toward the canal . Only approximately 2k of the site (0 . 15 acres) is subject to waterways jurisdiction. This area will be paved in order to accommodate approximately 17 parking spaces and a portion of a aite drive. No buildings are proposed within the area subject to waterways juriadiction. Aa such, the Waterways regulations pertaining to design and location of buildings are .not applicable. However, the proposed supermarket building is laid out on the site such that moat of` the existing yiews toward the North River Canal are maintained. _ The building is one-story which will also minimize wind and shadow impacts. Further, the facade of the building ia designed to present an aesthetic appearance as viewed from the canal . Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N Written Determination Page 5 E 0 Finally, the supermarket is a facility of public accommodation which will promote year-round use of the site. Although no open space is required by the Waterways regulationa for this project (no buildings are proposed within filled tidelands) , the Applicant is providing approximately 0 .5 acres of publicly accessible open space. This publicly accessible open space will be located adjacent to the Old South Burial Ground, in the southeast corner of the site. The Old South Burial Ground in listed in the Massachuaetta Reaister and the propoaed open apace will provide a natural transition from the quiet Burial Grounda to the more intense parking uses on site. In addition, the perimeter of the aite will be landscaped to visually enhance the North River Ganal and a new sidewalk to be built along Howley Street . The perimeter landscaping will also serve as a buffer to adjacent residences and provide wildlife habitat . Besides the open space and landscaping, the site itself will remain relatively open becauae the supermarket building will occupy less than 30� of the site, and the remainder will be parking fields, vehicular circulation drives, and stormwater management structures. The project meets the requirements for public access and facilities to activate use of the waterfront pursuant to 310 CMR 9 . 52 . A 7-foot wide sidewalk will be conatructed along the eastern side of Howley Street . This sidewalk will improve ' pedestrian access to the North River Canal from Main Street/Boston Street . Period street lighting, as well as landscaping, will improve the experience of pedestrians utilizing this sidewalk. Also, a walkway will be built in the publicly accessible open space . That walkway will extend from Howley Street to the proposed supermarket to encourage pedestrian access . Sicycle racks will also be provided. As previously mentioned, the site is aeparated from the Canal by the B & M railroad. The location of the railroad limits the opportunity to provide on-site accesa along the w�terfron� . The Cities of Salem and Peabody are in the process of developing a North River waterfront walkway, a aection of which will be located on the opposite bank of the canal, and are working with the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) to have the walkway project included. in the Transportation Improvement Plan. To further the creation of the waterfront walkway, the Applicant will donate $25, 000 to the City of Salem towarda the walkway planning, provided that the NffiD includes the walkway in the Transportation Improvement Plan. The Applicant has applied for an extended 99 year licenae -term � for the activities proposed on filled tidelands . The 99-year term was requested in order to recover the costs associated with remediating the contaminants located on site . Thia term is appropriate for the following reasons : the proposed project will remediate an existing contaminated aite, it includes publicly � f Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N Written Determination � Page 6 accessible open space in excess of the amount of filled tidelands, and the entire site will be devoted entirely to facilities of public accommodation which will ensure that the tidelands on site will be uaed by a broad range of the public,-, � rather than be restricted to a particular user group as could be the case with a facility of private tenancy. Further, the proposed project is consistent with Cities of Salem and Peabody planning goals for the area because it redevelops a blighted site while protecting the Old South Burial Ground through the provision of a landscaped buffer. Based on the analysis above, the Department finda that the benefits the project confers to the public exceed the detriments and that the project aerves a proper public purpose . B) Consistency. with the Policies of the Coastal Zone ManaQement Office As this project is not located in the Coastal Zone, the Department finds no conflict with the policiea of the � Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Program. C) MEPA Section 61 FindinQ Pursuant to G.L. Chapter- 30, section 61 and 301 CMR 11 . 10, the Department hereby finda that the project authorized and described herein will incorporate appropriate feasible measures to avoid or minimize potential environmental impacts that may result from conatruction and. operation of the project to be licensed pursuant hereto. VII. DEPARTMENT'S SPPsCIAL CONDITIONS On the basis of the foregoing analysis, the Department will approve the proposed atructures and uaes described herein, as modified and delineated on the final license plans to be submitted to the Department (hereinafter the "draft license plans") . This determination is made subject to the following special conditions to be carried out by the referenced Applicant (hereinafter the "Licensee") . These conditions will be included, in substantially the form provided below, with the proapective Chapter 91 Waterways licenses to be isaued purauant hereto along with the standard license conditions . Soecial Condition 1 : The Licensee shall construct and maintain in good repair an approximately 7-foot wide sidewalk along the eastern side of Howley Street , publicly acceaeible open space, and landscaping, as located and described on the plan entitled .: "Landscape Plan, " prepared by Vanesse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. , on. file with the Department. The publicly accesaible open space : .. shall contain a walkway no less than 5 feet in width extending from Howley Street to the supermarket . Final design of said walkway, publicly accesaible open spaces, and landscaping shall 1 Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N ,, Written Determination ` Page 7 be in accordance with the Special Permit and Site Plan Approvals € issued by the Cities of Peabody and Salem, on file with the Department . Construction of said walkway, open space, and landscaping shall be completed prior to issuance of the Cities of Peabody and City of Salem 's Certificate of Occupancies for the supermarket . Snecial condition 2 : The Licensee shall contribute $25, 000 to the City of Salem, provided that a North River Canal walkway/bicycle path is included in the Massachusette Highway Department Improvement Plan. Said contribution shall be used by the City of Salem to fund planning of a walkway/bicycle path along the North River Canal or to provide access to said canal . Said funds shall be contributed to the City of Salem no later than sixty (60) days after the walkway/bicycle path project is included in the Transportation Improvement Plan, and the Licenaee shall notify the Department in writing when the contribution is made. �ec;a� enndi ;on 3 : The walkways along Howley Street and the publicly accesaible open space specified in Special Condition 1, shall be available to the general public, free of charge, 24 hours a day, subject to reasonable rules . The Licensee may adopt rules governing the walkway and parking facilities on the site, subject to prior review and written approval by the Department, as are necessary for the protection of public health and safety and private property, and to ensure their use and enjoyment by minimizing conflicts between user groups . No amendment to said rules shall be made without prior written approval by the Department . snPciai �ond; r;�n a : The Licensee shall place and maintain in good repair appropriate aignage of an adequate size to be clearly visible to pedestrians at a prominent location at the aite. Said aignage shall be consistent with all local laws, regulations and any design guidelines that may be specified by the City of Peabody or Salem, as appropriate . Said signage shall encourage public , patronage of the walkway facilities, state the hours of public access and any reasonable rules for their use in aecordance with Special Condition 3 . At least one sign shall be placed in a ' prominent location stating the walkway facilities were required by the Department of Environrnental Protection, the waterways license number of the project, and the location on the aite where a copy of the license may be inspected by the public. All signage apecified in this condition shall be constructed prior to issuance of the City of Peabody or Salem, as appropriate, Certificate of Occupancy for the supermarket . �P -ia1 condi ion s ; The Licensee shall construct and maintain:in good repair a storm water drainage system subatantially as shown and delineated on the draft license plan. Gpec�al cond� r_i�n 6 : The Licensee shall fulfill the commitmenta made through the Massachusetta Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) r ' Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N � . Written Determination � Page 8 process to the Massachusetts Historical Commission to protect the Old South Burial Ground and other historic resources. These commitments include constructing the publicly accessible open . space adjacent to the Old South Burial Ground described in Special Condition No. 1 and documenting or preserving structures located on site . Said commitments shall be completed prior to issuance of the Cities of Peabody or Salem Certificate of Occupancies for the supermarket . Special Condition 7 : The license to be iasued pursuant hereto is valid for a term of 99 years from the date of license issuance. By written request of the Licensee for an amendment, the Department may grant a renewal for the term of years not to exceed that authorized in the original license . S�ecial Condition 8 : This Written Determination shall remain valid until the license is isaued or for up to one year after the Written Determination is issued, whichever is sooner. Said term may be extended for one or more one year periods, provided that the Applicant . submit to the Department, thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of said term a written request to extend� the term and provides an adequate justification for said extension. VIII. NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS: _ , A) A��eal Riahts and Time Limits � - - This determinati�on is an action of the Department. If you are aggrieved by this � action, and meet the criteria of 310 CMR 9.17, you may request an adjudicatory � hearing. A request for a hearing must be made in writing and postmarked within twenty-one (21) days of the date this determination was issued. B) Contents of HearinQ Reauest Under 310 CMR 1.01(6) (b) , the request must state clearly and concisely atate the • � facts which are the ground for the request, and relief sought. Additionally, the request must state why the determination is not conaietent with applicable laws � and regulatione. � � In addition, pursuant to 310 CMR 9.i7(3) , any notice of claim for an adjudicatory hearing must include the following information: the DEP Waterways Application File Number, name of. the applicant and addrese of the project; the complete name, addresa, and telephone number of the party filing the request and, if represented by counsel, the name, addresa and telephone number of the attorney and, if claiming to be a person aggrieved, the specific facts that demonstrate that the party satisfies the definition of ^aggrieved person^ found in section 9.02; a clear statement that a formal adjudicatory hearing is being requested; a clear and concise statement of the specific objectione to the Department's written determination, and the relief sought through the adjudicatory hearing, including specifically the changes desired in the final written determination; and a . atatement that- a copy of the request has been sent to: the applicant and the , municipal official of the city or town where the project ie located. C) FilinQ Fee and Address� - - The hearing �request along with a valid check payable to the Commonwealth of Maseachusetta in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100) muat be mailed to: Waterways Application No. W97-8790-N d Written Determination � Page 9 ( E Commoawealth of Maeeachueette Departmeat. of 8nvironmental Protectioa PO Hox 4062 . � Soe[oa, Maee. 02211 , � t At the same time, pursuant to 310 CMR 9.17, a copy of this appeal ehall be sent by certified mail or hand delivery to the applicant, and other parties to this proceeding, if any, and to the municipal official of the city or town where the project is located. The request will be dismiased if the filing fee is not paid, unless the appellant is exempt or granted a waiver as deacribed below. D) Exceptions II The filing fee is not required if the appellant is a city or town (or municipal agency) , couaty, or district of the Commcnwealt.h of Massachusetts, or a municipal housing authority. � E) Waiver The Department.may waive the adjudicatory hearing filing fee for a peraon who � shows that paying the fee will create an undue financial hardship. A peraon . seeking a waiver must file, together with the hearing request as provided above, an affidavit setting forth the facte believed to eupport the claim of undue financial hardehip. THIS DETERMINATION IS ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL I PROTECTION ON THE 15th DAY OF October, 1998. �._, l�/ �-� � Pa�me�a D. Ha y Program Manager Wetlands and Waterways PDH/TMM/tmm � � Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Department of ' -� , Environmental Protection Metro Boston/Northeast Regional Office , William F.Weld Trudy Coxe Govemor Secre�ery Argeo Paul Cellueei David B. Struhs �. Lt.Govemor � Commissianer . . �'�p•�.�.,1,°�... ! Y� ��11.� December 27, 1995 �AN 2 � 19Qu Mr. Paul Sommer ��12E : WETLANDS/PEABODY Sommer Environmental ��+°°"� WETLANDS/SALEM 65 New Salem Street ��1�� 1@� DEP FILE #55-369 Wakefield, MA 01880 DEP FILE #64-238 Boston & Howley St . Stop & Shop INFORMATION REQUEST Dear Mr. Sommer : The Department of Environmental Protection has completed its initial review of the project referenced above . The following information is requested so that the Department can complete its evaluation of this project in preparation for issuance of a Superseding Order of Conditions . Please submit the additional information within twenty-one (21) days of your receipt of this letter. � ; ', _ 1 . Please provide a. profile plan of the culvert where it exits the bank, and provide details about the extent of rip-rap and proposed slope treatment (if any) for the area around the outlet . 2 . The Department has determined that a wildlife habitat evaluation is required for areas within Bordering Land Subject to Flooding which will be altered by the proposed project . The Department acknowledges that part of the site has been extensively altered by human activities, particularly the area immediately adjacent to Howley Street . However, based on oi�servations du-ri:.g the site visits, it appeare that some wildlife habitat potential may exist on the remaining portions of the property. The habitat evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined under 310 CMR 10 . 59 . 3 . Please provide copies of the hydrologic worksheets which show the basic assumptions underlying the calculations of the time of concentration (TC) for existing and proposed conditions . 4 . The direct discharge of stormwater from the site into the North River, as currently proposed, is not acceptable . The stormwater management design should provide detention for the first flush (0 . 5 inches) of runoff from the site and should incorporate Best Management Practices for runoff from a range of 10 Commerce Way • Woburn,Massachusetts 01807 • FAX(677)932-7615 • Telephone(617)932-7600 Page 2 DEP #55-369 & #64-238 Info Request • storms up to the 25-year storm event . In addition, the project should not result in an increase of peak rates of discharge during a 100-year storm when compared with existing conditions . If infiltration trenches are proposed, please show a detailed design, their proposed location, existing groundwater elevations and perc rates at the proposed location. Should you have any questions about this .request, please contact Rachel Freed at 617/932-7783 . " Very truly yours, �/, Sabin M. Lord, . Regional Engineer for Resource Protection cc : Peabod Conservation Commission Cit Hall 24 Low 11 Y , y , e St . , Peabody 01960 Salem Conservation Commission Town H all Salem 01970 Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , c/o Serafini, Serafini & Darling, 63 Federal Street, Salem Hoang Tri Lam, 79 Beaver Street, Salem John C. Jeffers, 164 Boston Street, Salem John R. Keilty, 40 Lowell Street, Peabody William DiMento, 990 Paradise Road, Swampscott 01907 Raymond Talkington, Ransom Environmental, Brown' s Wharf, Newburyport 01950 , .. � CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS •� PLANNIkG DEPARTMENT �;coxw d WILLIAM E. LUSTER �'v � �� ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner �,e �+g�.` �� 01970 �� ry'�', ,� (508) 745-9595, EXT. 311 ye��e�, FAX (508) 744-5918 TO: Dennis Daly, Purchasing .�jgeHE� - / �) , FROM: William E. Luster, Ci•�`��;� - _ RE: Request to Hire Wetlands Consultant DATE: May 16, 1995 The Conservation Commission has received a Notice of Intent filing for the proposed Super Stop and Shop Supermazket development on Howley Street. Due to the magnitude of this project, the Commission has received approval from Mayor Hazrington to hire a Wetlands/Hydrology Consultant to assist in the review of this appiication. Services shall include, but not be limited to the following: -Review of Notice of Intent (IVOI) filing; -Visit the site as necessary; -Prepazation of a report with findings for review by the Planning Department and Conservation Commission; -Meet with the Planning Department and Conservation Commission, as needed. The Consultant shall provide wetland consultation services and have extensive knowledge of hydrology. I would like to suggest that a Not to Exceed fee of $4,000 be established for this project and the fee be based on an hourly rate. I I would like to request that quotes be solicited from the following consultants: 1. Gulf of Maine Reseazch Center, Salem 2. Hancock Environmental Services, Danvers The Commission has continued the public hearing until June 8, 1995 and we would like to have a consultant on board prior to that day. ' I have attached a requisition for these services to this memo. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Beth Debski. Thank you for your assistance. jm\bd\duly.mem .,.. . � COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS - EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS - DEPARTMENT OF EIQVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - METROPOLITAN BOSTON-NORTHEAST AEGIONAL OFFICE � WILLIAM F.WELD ��Sd;�� ' � TRUDY COXE � Governor �'u/'�::�.✓ Secretary � ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI . €�B ,1.L} '19�6 . DAVID B. STRUHS � Lt. Governor � Cammissioner ' S�I�m F'�►��n� 47ap�. February 12 , 1996 Mr. Michael E . McNeice RE: WETLANDS/PEABODY Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, InC . WETLANDS/SALEM 101 Walnut Street DEP FILE #55-369 P .O. Box 9151 DEP FILE #64-238 4datertown, MA 02272 Boston & Howley St . Stop & Shop INFORMATION REQUEST 2 Dear Mr. McNeice : The Department of Environmental Protection has completed its I review of the information which you submitted on January 18 , 1996 for the project referenced above : The comments and questions which, follow are based ori an evaluatiori of= that submittal . 1 . The performance of the proposed infiltration trenches cannot be evaluated or approved until percolation and groundwater data is provided fo"r- a1l -.the =proposed trenches : The Department will continue its' review of the stormwater management plan once additional information about the proposed infiltration trenches has been received. 2 . The Department is aware that the Peabody portion of the site I contains hazardous wastes and may require remediation of soil and groundwater. The "Environmental Evaluation" plan prepared by GZA shows that some of the wastes are located in the area of the proposed infiltration trenches . Additional information about the location, extent and proposed remediation of the hazardous wastes is needed before the Department can fully evaluate this project . For instance, infiltration of stormwater on the site may interfere with a future groundwater remediation project or may accelerate the movement of a hazardous waste plume . Until more information is provided, the Department will be unable to proceed with its review for a Superseding Order of Conditions . The applicant is hereby requested to notify the Department within fourteen 14 days as to whether the Department should stay its review or go .forward based on the information -currently available-: 3 . The Department disagrees with some of the conclusions of the wildlife habitat evaluation. While much of the site has been disturbed by human activities, it is the Department' s opinion 10 Commerce Way • WoDurn,Massachusetss 01801 • FAX (61�932-7615 • Telephone (617)932-7600 • TDD#(677)932-7679 t� Printr_oc 3¢�yded Paper .� 2 Page 2 DEP #55-369 & #64-238 Info Request that a portion of the site, specifically the area within the ten (10) year floodplain at the eastern-most end of the property, does provide some important wildlife habitat functions, and therefore mitigation will be required. The Department suggests that habitat mitigation might best be located in the vicinity of the proposed detention basin (outside the basin itself) and should incorporate vegetation that provides food and shelter for waterfowl and small mammals . Please provide the information described above in Items 1 and 3 within twenty-one (21) days of your receipt of this ' request . Should you have any questions about this matter, please contact Rachel Freed at 617/932-7783 . Very truly yours, �h V�"� ,� Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Regional Engineer for Resource Protection cc : Peabody Conservation Commission, City Hall , 24 Lowell St . , Peabody 01960 Salem Conservation Commission, Town Hall, Salem 01970 Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , c/o Serafini, Serafini & Darling, 63 Federal Street, Salem Hoang Tri Lam, 79 Beaver Street, Salem John C. Jeffers, 164 Boston Street, Salem John R. Keilty, 40 Lowell Street, Peabody William DiMento, 990 Paradise Road, Swampscott 01907 Raymond Talkington, Ransom Environmental, Brown' s wharf, � GZ"9 � F..ugineersA��d GeoEnvironmental, Inc. s�re»r�sn �, . February 23, 1996 File No. 13172.1-C Mr. Michael E. McNeice _ Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 101 Walnut Street Post Office Box 9151 Watertown, Massachusetts 02272 Re: Proposed Stop& Shop Site 3'_0 Needham S�reec Salem/Peabody Line Nc�cmn Upper Falls ' �l�ssachuseas 02164 bi�-v6v-ooso Deaz Mr. McNeice: FAX 617-965-7769 We have reviewed the Information Reques[ from DEP dated February 12, 1996 and have provided the following information, plans, and tables of chemical data to address their concerns. In sununary, detailed studies conducted by GZA and others have identified limited azeas of soil contamination near abandoned underground storage tanks and a vaul[ most likely used to collect Gquids from floor drains from a former building. We expect to remediate these azeas by removing [he abandoned tanks and associated contaminated soils by traditional soil removal techniques following the requirements of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP). Residual soiLs would be significandy below relevant soil standazds prescribed in the MCP. The tank and soil removal would be conducted as part of the construction process, rior to the installation of P any infiltration system Investigations to date have not detected groundwater conditions wtilch would require remediation. Virtually all compounds detected are below relevant groundwater quality standazds. a s��.s�a�o„ �,r cza GcoGnrlronmcn[al ', Te.n„�i��,i„�. After remediation of the soiLti, we would not expect that the planned infiltration sys[em[o cause Ian adverse impact to soil;u�d groundwater conditions at the site. SIT'E DFSCRIPTION The swdy site consists of five contiguous parceLs of land located at the intersection of Howley and Main Street, comprising approximately 7 acres of►and almost equally divided by the Salem and Peabody town line. Approximately 14 buildings aze presen[ at the site; several have been partially or totally destroyed by fue in 1989. The North River Canal, a small, appazendy manmade drainage canal iti located immediately north of the study site. CopyrightOO 1996 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. a�,ry�,i o��,,.��rmpi��,,�vr�mti 4 I i Vanesse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. February 23, 1996 File No. 13172.1-C Page 2 il SITE HISTORY � Historical use of the propeRy was documented through the use of Sanbom Hisrorical Atlases dating back to 1887. In summary, the western portion of the site along Howley Street (formerly �' Grove Street) was used for tannery activity from the late 1800's to the mid-1980's, while [he eastem portion of the site was used by lumber companies supporting the local tanneries. Historical atlases indicate[hat several other tanneries occupied the general uea west of the study site along Main Street, extending almost 800 fee[ westerly towazd the present day center of � rown. REGULATORY STATUS AND PREVIOUS REMEDIAL ACTIONS One of the site pazceLs, 9 Howley Street, Peabody, is presently iden[ified as a "L,oca[ion to be Investiga[ed" by the Massachusetts Departmen[ of Environmental Protection. This listing is most likely the result of a fire which destroyed the tannery buildings in March 1989. ENPRO of Newburyport, Massachusetts was engaged ro perform remedial activities after the fue. These activities included the removal of drums, the removal of liquids from certain aboveground and underground storage tanks, and ultimately [he removal of asbestos from the site. A DEP memo dated March 17, 1989, indicated that "no further action was required of (the) Emergency Response" division. PREVIOUS STUDIES Two previous studies which included s�bsurface explorations were conducted in 1991 and 1992 � by Pine and Swallow, Inc. These studies included the excava[ion of over 25 test pits to d'uectly �I observe subsurface conditions, the completion of 16 groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate ' groundwater quality, sampling of the North River Canal, and the completion of seven micro ' wells for further water ualit anal sis. 9 Y Y The key findings of the Pine and Swallow report were: • a recommendation to DEP that the site be classified as a "non-priority" site, • the detection of groundwater contamination "below Massachuse[ts Drinking Water Guidelines" with the exception of one compound�hloroform(1991), • [he detection of four "loc:ilized" areas of soil contamination, • the detection of only '7ocalized" groundwater contamination in the area of a subsurface concrete vau►t and a recommendation that groundwater does not need remedia[ion (1992), and , � Vanesse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. February 23, 1996 File No. 13172.1-C Page 3 • an opinion that the neazby North River Canal had not been significantly impacted. The primary source of the limited soil and groundwater contamination were abandoned ' underground storage tanks (USTs), and a subsurface concrete vault, possibly used to collect flow from floor drains in a former building. STUDIES BY GZA, 1993 In order to independendy confum the findings of other studies, GZA conducted an investigation of the site on behalf of Stop& Shop Companies. The GZA study consisted of the excavation of an additional 20 test pits by use of a backhoe, the completion of an additional six monitoring wells, and the sampling of numerous wells installed by others. The location of these test pits and I , wells was selected to collect data in areas not investiga[ed during previous studies, and to ' confirm[he limited areas of soil and groundwater contamination previously reported by Pine and Swallow. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for compounds typically associated with tanneries including VOCs, heavy metaLs, semi-volatile organic compounds, and PCBs. ' The attached tables 4 through 8 sununarize Ihe data from GZA's study. GZA'S CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, GZA's fmdings confirmed the results of previous studies conducted by others. That is: A) Based on twenty groundwater sampling locations, groundwater quality across [he ent've site has not been significandy impacted by hisroric site activities and large scale remediation of groundwater is not requ'ued. B) Areas of soil contamination appear ro be limited to areas around two abandoned underground storage tanks and a subsurface concrete vault. The contaminants of concern are primarily petroleum hydrocazbons wi[h the exception of the soils near a subsurface concrete vault where solvent contamination was detected. Based on the information gathered to da[e, it is expected that removal of the abandoned underground storage tanks, the concrete vault, and any nearby contaminated soiLs, will satisfy the remedial requirements of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP). We have estimated tha[ between 500 and 1,000 c.y. of soils will be removed from the site. The technology to remove the underground storage tanks and soils is not complica[ed and is performed routinely on various sites across the Commonwealth. J Vanesse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. February 23, 1996 File No. 13172.1-C Page 4 MCP REQUIItEMENTS Based on work completed prior to GZA's involvement in the project, the Nine Howley Street site was identified by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as a Location to be Investigated (LTBI). The site is identified as LTBI Number 3-3319 on DEP's August 1993 List of Confun�ed Disposal Sites and Locations to be Investigated (also known as the "Transition List"). This listing triggers the requirements of the 1993 MCP Transition provisions (310 CMR 40.0600). While there are a number of possible alternative actions under the MCP, the general requvement for the responsible party for transition sites is submission of a Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Evaluation Opinion indicating whether or not further response actions aze required by a prescribed deadline. For the Howley Street site, the deadline for submitta]of the LSP Evaluation is August 2, 1996. An LSP Evaluation Opinion for the Howley Street site will likely conclude that further response actions aze required. These response ac[ions would most likely be limited to removal of abandoned underground storage tanks on the site and removal of localized soil contamination. This work would be completed as a Release Abatement Measure (RAM) under 310 CMR 40.0440. A RAM plan would be submitted to DEP with the LSP Evaluation Opinion. Submittal of the plan would trigger a 21-day presumptive approval period. RAM work could be initiated under the d'uection of an LSP upon expiration of the presumptive approval period or receipt of DEP approval. The RAM plan would address health and safety issues to workers, as well as protection to resource azeas, during the soil removal process. The nearest excavations to the North River Canal would be over 200 feet away, and would no[ be expected to impact the Canal. Traditional soil abatement measures, such as hay bales and poly plastic sheeting, would be used during the removal process. After additional soil chazacterization, recycling and reuse of soils on-site as asphalt will be eva]uated. The RAM work would cuUninate in a Response Action Outcome (RAO) for the site. The RAO provides closure for sites under the new MCP regulations. We anticipate that a Permattent Solution RAO(Class A)can be achieved a[ the site with limited soil removal work. In conclusion, in the opinion of GZA, :ill of the work necessary to meet DEP requirements of the Massachusetts Contingency P►an to meet closure on this site can be accomplished with very traditional soil removal technologies, in a period of approximately one [o two months. I[is Stop & Shop's general practice to complete the remediation as part of precons[ruction ac[ivities once they are in control of lhe site. ' Vanesse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. February 23, 1996 File No. 13172.1-C Page 5 We hope this satisfies your present needs. Please call either of the undersigned with any questions you may have. Sincerely yours, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. ��.�, �.� � � � �� Chazles D. Crealese �2'�'�.- �Charles A. Lindberg Associate Principal Licensed Site Professional CDGCAL:dIw Attachments: Site Plan Tables of Chemical Data cc: Michael McKnight, Srop& Shop Josh Alper,Sherin& L.odgen G:\I3177 7S I NHB.LTR File No. 13172.1 06/0?J93:dja Page 1 of I TABLE 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SOILS: (VOCs,PHC) Former Tannery Site Salem\Peabody,MassacLusetts Sample ID VOCs b GC Saeen( b) _ VOGsby 8?A0 b) 'PHCs . PCE ` TCE cis 1.2 DCE 1 ' Lfuknovins ' All ( ' j TP-101, S-2 -- -- -- 58 • na na TP-lO1,S-3 na na na na -- 1600'"r TP-102,S-1 770 170 140 -- na na TP-102, 5-3 na na na na -- 7900**' T'P-102, S-4 -- -- -- 40* na na TP-105, S-1 -- -- -- 1 '* na na TP-106, S-1 -- -- -- -- na na TP-107, S-2 na na na na -- 120*•' TP-108, S-2 -- -- -- 1 '• na -- TP-108, 5-3 na na na na na 430 TP-109, S-1 -- -- -- 1 ** na na TP-113, S-2 -- -- -- 1 ** na 47 TP-114, S-1 -- -- -- 1 '• na 130 TP-116, S-2 -- -- -- 1 *' na na , TP-117,S-2 -- -- — 1 *• na na TP-119, S-2 -- -- -- 1 '" na na Notes: 1. 7est Pit samples taken by GZA personnel on May I1-12, 1993. 2. VOC analyses by GC and meU�od 81A0 perfom�ed by GZA's Env'uonmental Chemisay Laboratory in Newton,Massachusetts. Only tLose compounds de�ected are listed. 3. PHC analyses pedormed by GZA's Environmemal Chemistry Laborat�y in Newton, Massachusetts. ' 4. na indicates not analyzed for listed parameters. 5. --indicates not de[ected. 6. * indica[es un}�owns may be a petroleum distilla[e 7. * * indicates unknowns are methanol-a laboratory azufact. 8. "* Fingerpnnt analysis indicates petroleum product in tlie boiling range of mineial spirits. f/dmh/13172.1/tabl ufC4.XLS File No. 13172.1 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 'TADLE 6 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SOILS: (METALS) Former Tannery Site Salem\Peabody, Massachusetts Concentration(m /k ) A Sample 1D C� Cr ' Pb H Se � Ba -. -- TP-107, S-1 163 30.0 9.0 72.5 28.5 -� -- TP•108, S-Z 35.5 27.0 48.0 72.5 46A 5.1 39.0 5.0 12.0 38.0 0.1 -- TP-101, S-3 �p p 35.0 910.0 0�6 �'� TP-102, S-3 19.3 156.0 _. __ 13.5 59.0 5.0 211.0 240.0 0.2 TP-109.S-I 11.0 179.0 590.0 1.4 0.8 7P-I 13,S-2 10.8 140.0 -- -- TP-114,S-1 9.7 52.0 8.0 42.0 7A0.0 0.2 Literamre Back round <0.1 -73 10- 5,000 0.01 -0.7 I - 3,000 2-300 0.01 - 3.4 <0.] - 3.9 0.01 - 5 Notes: 1. Samples collected by GZA personnel on May 11, 1993. ntained in A endix 8. ' wn MA. Results co PP 2, Analyses pedormed by Mauix Malypcal,Inc. of Hopkm , 3, TP refers to test pit number, S-#refers to sample number in test pit. Test pit logs are contained in Appendix D. q. _-indicates nothing detected. 5. "Literawre Background" values represent ranges of inetals reported in natural soils from the following three sources: a) Wallace H. Fuller Movement of Selected Metals, Asbesros and Cyan�de in soil: Applicauons to Waste Disposal Problems (EPA-600/2-77-020) b) H.l.M Bower"Toxic Elements in Biochemisuy" (1966). c) Hansford Shacklette and Josephine Boerngen, "Element Concentrauons in Soils and Other Surficial Materials of the Centerminous United States" (USGS Paper 7270: 1984). d mN 13172.1 hab I<s(C6.xb ' File No. 13172.1 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 TABLE 5 ' ANALYTICAL RESULTS ' TEST PIT SOIIS: (Semi-VOCs,PCBs) Former Tannery Si[e Salem\Peabody,Massachusetu Sam Ie ID , Semi-VOCs( b) TP-101.S-3 TP-102.S-3 TP-105.S-1 TP-107,S-2 POLYAROMATIC I HYDROCAItBONS Z� __ Na hthalene �� __ Acena htLylene -� 94 120 1300 3000 Acena httiene 120 Z� ' 920 F7uorene 800 12� 12� 290 � Phenanthrene 3500 1100 3100 180 150 Antluacene 94� 3500 340 F7uoranthene �� I 2500 13000 37pp 390 Pyrene 23� __ Benzo-a-anthracene 910 1� 560 8200 1800 Chrysene �� __ 1500 8000 Benzo-b-flourand�ene 1600 "- 1500 �l� ' Benzo-k-flouranthene 150 " I __ 3300 Benzo-a- yrene 1100 __ I Indeno-1,2,3-cd- yrene -' 37� __ PHTHALA7ES ( b) -- _ ADIPATFS( b) na " PCBs( b) -- Notes: 1. Test Pit Soiis talcen by GZA personnel on May 5•6, 1993. 2. Semi-VOC analyses(bY Gas Chromatograph)and PCB screening performed by GZA's Envuonmental Chemistry Laboracary in New[on,Massac6usetts. Onty those compounds detec[ed aze listed. 3. na indicates nothing detected. 4. -- indicates not detected. ted ma be a evoleum distillate such as fuel oil. 5 * indicates unlrnowns detec Y P (. ** indicates trace levels of[wo early eluung unlrnown compounds which may be the product of uucrobial de8radauon• f/drtJJ13172.1 hablu/IS.7Q.S � File No. 131721 I ' 06/02/93:dja Pagelofl TABLE 7 ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUNDWATER: (VOCs,PHC� Fotmer Tannery Site Salem\Peabody,Massachussetts Sample ID VOCs b GC Screen( b) VOCs (Method 8240) b) PHCs PCE TCE cis 1,2 DCE imtmowat MTBE :BENLENE "< ' :'PCE . ( m) TP-101 -- -- -- 13• na na na na TP-107 -- -- -- 28• na na na na TP-108 -- -- -- 1' na na na na MR'-I na na na na -- -- BMQL -- �'�'-Z -- -- -- -- na na na na M�'-3 -- -- -- -- na na na na �'-6 -- -- -- -- na na na na MW-7 na na na na 10 -- -- 12 M�'�'-g -- -- -- -- na na na na �-9 -- -- -- — na na na na PS-� -- -- -- -- na na na na PS-2 na na na na 92 -- -- - PS-4 -- -- -- -- na na na na PS-� -- -- -- -- na na na na GZ-1 -- -- -- -- na na na na GZ-2 na na na na 16 -- -- -- GZ-3 -- -- -- -- na na na na GZ-4 na na na na 13 -- -- 0.44 GZ-5 na na na na 12 11 -- -- GZ-6 -- -- -- 2"• na na na na Notes: '' 1. Groundwater samples taken by GZA personnel on May 21 and 24, 1993. 2. VOC analyses by GC and method 8240 perfocmed by GZA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory in New[on, Massachusetts. Only those compounds detected aze listed. 3. PHC analyses pedormed by GZA's Environmrntal Chemistry Labornrory in New[on, Massachuse[ts. 4. na indicates not analyzed for listed parameters. 5. --indicates not detected. 6. * indicates unlmowns detec[ed may be a petroleum disullate such as fuel oil. 7. *• indicates trace levels of two eazly eluting unlmown compounds whic6 utay be the product of microbial degradation. armn.xi.s File No. 13172.1 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 TAI3LC 8 ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUNDWATER: (DISSOLVED METALS) Former Tannery Site Salem\Peabody,Massachusetts Weli ID Concentrauon(u /1) As Ba Cd Cr Pb H Se A G�2 -- 80 1 -- 3 -- -- GZ-4 -- 50 2 -- 2 -- -- 60 PS-2 -- 10 1 -- -- -- -- -- ' G�5 6 20 I 38 8 -- -- 40 Notes: 1. Samples collected by GZA personnel on May 21, 1993. All samples filtered wiW 0.45 micron filter. 2. Analyses pedom�ed by Matriz Analytical,Inc. of Hopkin[on,MA. Resul[s contained in Appendix E. 3. GZ refers to GZA moni[oring well;PS refers to Pine&Swallow Microwell. 4. --indicates nothing detected. va�,n 3 i�2.�naniurs.xis "' " " Yanasse Hangen Brustlin, I I . Transpotta[ion . . L2nd Uevebpment � Envimnmental Services � 101 Walnu[ S[ree[ I� Post Office Box 9S1 Watertown Massachusetts 02?i3 61i 924 �770 R��EIi/ED I FAX Gt�924 228G I� fE6 2 8 1996 '� Feb�,ary 2s, isss 3alem Plannmg papt. ' Ref.: 03834.26 , Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Regional Engineer for Resource Protection I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 10 Commerce Way Woburn, MA 01801 ; Re: Proposed Stop & Shop Peabod /Salem Massachusetts Y , DEP File#55-369 DEP File#64-238 Dear Mr. Lord: Enclosed is�a copy of Supplemental Information that was requested by DEP in a letter dated �I February 12, 1996. The DEP letter requested information on the infiltration system, hazardous waste remediation and wildlife habitat. The information in the attached letter pertains to the location, extent and proposed remediation of the hazardous wastes for the site of the proposed Stop&Shop located on Howley Street in the Cities of Peabody and Salem, Massachusetts. Detailed studies conducted by GZA GeoEnvironmental (GZA) and others have identified limited areas of soil contamination near abandoned underground storage tanks and vaults. These areas will be remediated by removing the tanks and associated contaminated soils by traditional soil removal methods, following the required Massachusetts Contingency Plan. The attached letter from GZA describes the methods in greater detail. In regard to the percolation test results, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) has scheduled deep-hole and percolation tests to be performed in the area of the proposed infiltration system for Wednesday February 28, 1996. As explained in the GZA letter, investigations to date have not ' detected groundwater conditions that will require remediation or preciude the use of an infiltration system. The results of the groundwater observations and percolation testing wili be compiled and the previously submitted infiltration calculations will be re-analyzed to ensure the adequacy of the ro osed s s m p p y te . Finally, a Landscaping Plan to address the Departments concerns with regard to loss of wildiite habitat on the developed site is being developed. The plan will include mitigation plantings in the vicin' f d o the ro osed detention basin to be ioc Y p p ated at the rear of the proposed building. The percolation test results and the Landscape Plan will be forwarded to the DEP prior to the required 21 day response deadline (March 7, 1996). \\VULI'AN\WMDOWS\03834\LEffERS\REQRESP2.DUC � r . . . w� I 11JJ Ms. Rachel Freed Project No.: 03834 January 18, 1996 Page 2 � If you have any questions on the endosed materials or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (617) 924-1770. Very truly yours, V SSE A N BRUSTLIN, INC. c ael . cNeice, P.E. enior Project Manager Enclosure cc (w/enclosures): R. Freed, DEP Northeast Region Peabody Conservation Commission • Salem Conservation Commission� `M. McKnight, Stop& Shop ' L. Frank, Stop &Shop J. Serefini, Serafini, Serafini & Darling ' R. Davis, Goulston & Storrs I C. Crealese, GZA \\VULCAN\WIN�OW5\03836\LETfERS\REQRFSP2.DUC � ,_ _ : _-�■ Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, lnc. 'fransportazion . Lnd Development Environmenml Services � 101 Walnu[ S[reet . Pos[Office Box 9lii Watertown Massachusetts 022i2 � 617 9z4 1770 FAX 617 J24 2?86 . March6, 1996 „1��@al°�.k Ref.: 03834.26 MAH ' '� 1Q96 Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Regional Engineerfor Resource Protection r,�� '6�4�1�4�'� �GN►• Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 10 Commerce Way , Woburn, MA 01801 Re: Proposed Stop & Shop Peabody/Salem, Massachusetts DEP File #55-369 DEP File#64-238 Dear Mr. Lord: Enclosed is supplemental information that was requested by DEP in a letter dated February 12, 1996. The DEP letter requested information on the proposed infiltration system, wildlife habitat and hazardous waste remediation. The requested information is provided in the attached memoranda The following information pertains to the percolation rates and groundwater levels in the infiltration system area and the creation of compensatory wildlife habitat areas on the developed site \ Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) has completed the required percolation tests in the vicinity of the proposed infiltration system (see attached memo), and determined that the percolation rate of the soils is 8 minutes per inch. The infiltration system was originally designed based on an assumed percolation rate of 5 minutes per inch. The original system has been re-analyzed based on the actual percolation rates from the field work. The originally designed system is adequate to provide infiltration of the i first 1/2 inch of runoff from the paved parking area of the site. VHB has also determined that the system as originally proposed is of adequate size to achieve the desi n criteri g a of maintaining the peak rates of runoff from the site for the 10, 25 and 100 design storm events. The revised Soil Conservation Services TR-20 computer run based on the actual percolation rates and supporting calculations are attached for your information. The , system that was originally designed was sized very conservatively to ensure that if the actual percolation rates were slower than assumed, it would not result in an increase in system size. \\VUI.CAN\W➢V�OWS\03&49\Lh'ITERS\REQRESP3.DOC I �i.lJ Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Project No.: 03834 March 6, 1996 Page 2 The resulting stormwater runoff rate summary is as follows:� EXISTING ORIGINAL REVISED CONDITION SYSTEM SYSTEM 10-YEAR STORM 20.0 cfs 16.1 cfs 17.7 cfs 25-YEAR STORM 23.6 cfs 19.4 cfs 21.0 cfs 100-YEAR STORM 30.6 cfs 26.0 cfs 27.6 cfs We have also enclosed a copy of the Landscape Plan which addresses the concerns raised by the DEP with regard to loss of wildlife habitat due to the development of the site. The plan includes additional plantings in the vicinity of the proposed detention basin. The proposed Mutiflora Rose is a relatively low-growing planting that will provide habitat for wildlife. The proposed River Bank Grape, Highbush Blueberry and Silky Dogwood will provide food sources. We are also proposing plantings within the basin and on the basin slopes to provide aquatic wildlife habitat and food. The enclosed information supplements the materials provided in our letter dated February 26, 1996 pertaining to the hazardous waste remediation. If you have any questions on the enclosed materials or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (617) 924-1770. Very truly yours, ASSE N N BRUSTLIN, INC. ichael E. McNeice, P.E. Senior Project Manager Enclosure cc (w/enclosures): R. Freed, DEP Northeast Region Peabody Conservation Commission � Salem Conseroation Commission' M. McKnight, Stop & Shop L. Frank, Stop & Shop J. Serafini, Serafini, Serafini & Darling R. Davis, Goulston & Storrs C. Crealese, GZA \\WLCeW\WINDOWS\03834\LEITERS\REQRFSP3.DOC ' � Vannsse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Transportation Land Development Environmental Services� � 101 Walnut$treet . . Post Office Box 9151 Watertown Massachusetts 02272 617 924 1�70 ' � FAX 617 924 2286 Memorandum To: Files Date: February 29,1996 Project No.: 0383426 From: Mike Tucker Re: Peabody/Salem Stop&Shop On Wednesday,February 28,three perc tests were completed at the Peabody/Salem Stop&Shop Site while GZA was excavating for their test pits. The perc tests were completed as close to the infiltration areas as possible,and are shown on the attached plan. To perform the perc tests,a test hole approximately 12 inches across and 18 inches deep was dug on a shelf excavated in the test pits. The hole was then fIlled with water to a depth of 12 inches and allowed to sit and saturate the soil for 15 minutes. After this 15 minute period,the length of time was measured for the water to drop from a depth of 9 inches to a depth of 6 inches. The length of time was then divided by three to obtain an average perc rate, in minutes per inch. The results of the perc tests are as follows: ` ,PERC TEST NUMBER r" " , PERC RATE(MINUTES/INCH) .x TE$T NO. 1 �,p TEST NO. 2 �,5 TEST NO. 3 1.5 A erc rate o f 8 minutes er inch will be used in the P p revised calculation to be conservative. Based on groundwater levels described in the attached test pit logs,it was determined that groundwater is at a maximum elevation of 7 feet. \\Im2K\LD\N834\DOCS\MEMOS\PERC.DOC � �� " � � � '� ��,�i �� , � — _��_ ��,o.�o� � ��o��ar...,,�.i..� �� ` ��' �� ,�!�� \��5�.lI"75 ��k:�.L�s�l��i �, � �� '� :�t`:�, ..c:._►� �:�Z%:?�l '�r�►�:L� ��3�•:�z��esr�n��zl�r��n��s�s�e�� \ l� C�' �r`a�ir��v�� O�. iro��sv��., � �� ' '�v . -�� i � �, q �.�aa�ai�=�� .�..� _________ ., ,��r� :. I -------e..� , d c �� , �� r �� ' � '�� `��ir f,..�.� ' �: � �#:�. �. t��*-�. r.-+` � h � ., .� �- ' �. -�a . ..�/.�f��i�i��►�s�i�'l�Os.�tua.��e�.. ��.�rr��►��au�i��awtrin��c��ow��n��v... \ � ' G��iS3�TwG�'3S�i�=i1��TiioGiii�iZ'ii�8i�3"i�if�"O�i � � �� '��, ,��, ,V r� �� +��', �' \ � ,[� � ' r � �ii�� Il `�� -�- v�" m•�.i � ��I �il� � m, �!!�� .: ��I � � . . �. �i��.� � � ��'m _ � , � �i ��,I . �� `� ��. ��,:� . `�n1�'�► . .an � . �► ��,..�:gs��--+�- �:�� ' A .�.,�.�.�.��.��:`.�e.�.�..�.��' �� _ ,;I� ., ,'' � �� -� f�:� f�� • - - � __-- - - - - — -- - � � � ' �: , ,� ' — �' � _ �.� - --- -- �� — ��, Ei7[O ► . � � I , .:-.- - - -_` ! � -�- .� �,'- ,. G2k GEOENViRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST VIT N0. TP-201 E�ineers/Seientists SNEET N0. TdFT Sto 8 Sho FILE N0. �3772 Z— � ea v, assac usetts CH1a. BY: —QRf�— � EXCAYATION EOUIPMENT GU REP. C. Basile CONTRACTOR Amsco DATE 0�/r28/96 OPERATOR Uonn amos GRWND ELEV. 0 LIEATNER Rain. 40s MAKE TIME STARTEO �47�— � CAPAC . cu. . REACH —Z'�'i{ TIME COMPlETEO �4L�— . DEPTN SANPLE SOfL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BWLDERS: REMARK N0. � READING EFFORT CWN7/ N0. � . (ppn) CLASS 0.2� ASPHALT PAVEMENT �� 0.7� elack, fine to coarse SAND 8 GRAVEL, little Silt (FILL), E Brown/oran9e fine [o mediun SAND, little Cinders, E Z' 7.7' tittle silt (FILL). . Brown, fine to coarse SAND 8 GRAYEL, trace Silt with E 3' 2.5' Cobbles (FILL), q, E 1,2 Nhite,.black and orenge LINOERS and ASH-like material 5� (FILU. E 3 6' 6� � E �i E Tan, Fiberous PEAT. 8' E qr 9, t E Gray, fine ta medium SANO, trace Organic Silt, trace �O� Orgam c Fibers. � E Bottan of Test Pit at 10� t. it� 12' 13' " , 75� 16� REMARKS: 1. Jar soil sample obtained �at a depth of 3' to 5�. 2. Grounduater encountered a[ a depth af approximately 3' to 5'. 3. Vater tevel inside test pit stayed at a depth of 5' uhile excavating belou this depth. Due to mixing and disturbance, stratun locations and soil cLassifications are approximate belou a depth of 5'. G:\13172.ZS1\13172-20.RMK\REPORTS\TEST.PIT\25120001.FRM TEST PIT PLAN BWLDER CIASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRWNDNATER USED 8� LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENLWNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM S�I-�1 ( ) NOT ENCWNTERED L_� TRACE <TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18�� - 36" L(TTIE (LI.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM T1ME TO TO � C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND�- SOME CSO.) 20 • 35X GR = CRAY (HWRS) VATER BN = BR04N NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - SOX YEL = YELLOV YOIUME = 14 cu.yd E-----EASY 0 3'. to 5' M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT �, CU GEOENVIRONNENTAL, 1NC. PROJECT TEST P[T NO. TG-202 �irxers/Seimtists SHEET N0. T—QF—T— Sto & Sho FIIE N0. �3172T� ee assa� uset s CHKD. BY: 11pK-'— � E%CAYATION EOUIPMENT GZq REP. C. Basile CONTRACTOR Amsco � DATE ��_�_02�28�96 OPERATOR Donn amos GRWND EIEV. —TIIT— VEATNER Rain. 40s MAKE TIME STARTED —Q95�— CAPpt cu.v . REALH ��{F T(ME COMPIETED �IITS— DEPTH SAMPLE SOfL DESCRIPTION 7I0 EXCAV. BOULDERS: RENARK N0. READING EFFORT CWNT/ N0. (ppn) ClASS Black/brown, fine to ooarse SAND, little Silt, trace E 1' Organics, traee Roots <lOAN). Z, Z� E 1,2 3, E Brown fine to coarse SAND ard GRAVEL, little Siti, Cobbles 4� CFILLS. E Si E 6� 6� = E . Da�k brown, fine-9rained PEAT, trace to some Woady Fibers. �� E 8� E 9' E Gray; tine to medium SAND, trace Organic Silt encountered at �� bottan of test pit. E Boc[om of Test Pit at 70' t. 71� 72� 13' 14' 75' II 16' I REMARKS: i. Gro�mdwater encouniered at a depth of 2'. 2. Water level inside test pit stayed at a depth af Z' uhile excavating belou tnis depth. Due [o mixing a�d disturbance, stratun Locations and soil classifications are approximate below a depth of 2�. G:\13172.ZS1\13172-20.RMK\REPORTS\TEST.PIT\Z5120002.FRM TEST PIT PLAN BWLDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIAT[ONS GRWNDYATER 9� LETTER SIZE RANGE USED F = FINE DESIGNATION CIASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM <X) ENCWNTERED 5�C� TRACE (TR.) 0 • 10� L = COARSE < > NOT ENLWNTERED A 6" - 18" V = VERY � ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE i0 MEDIUM TIME TO TO �(._ C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND- SOME (S0.) 20 • 35X GR = GRAY (HWRS) WATER BN = BROUN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - SOY. YEL = YELLON VOLUME = 16 eu.yd E-----EASY 0 2� N-----NODERATE � � � D-----DIFfICULT GYT� GEOENViRONMENTAL, IMC. PROJELT TEST PIT H0. TP-203 Engirxers/Scien[ists SHEET N0. T—dF—'T— - � Sto 8 Sho FIIE N0. —13172 Z— ea assac uset s CHKD. BY: �tRf�'— EXCAVATION EOU[PMENT GZA REP. C. Basile CONTRACTOR Amsco OPERATOR Donn amos GRWND ELEV. ��Z� . NEATXER Cloudv, LOs MAKE TIME STARTED �OZ�' CAPAC cu.v , REACH �1"--{{ TINE COMPLETED '�ZQ�— DEPTH SMIVLE � SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BWlOERS: REHARK N0. � READING EFFORT CWNT/ N0. East <ppm) CLASS uest 0.2� B �� NC. S AB D i. ' Z' B�own, fine to mediun SAND, M , liitle Silt CFILU. 3� Brown fine to coarse E SAND � GRAVEL, trace � Yood Silt (FRU. � � <' L100D LAGGING E 2,3 5, E Dark 6rown, fine 8�� Concrete p 6' to mediun SAND and COBBlES little Peat, little �ilt (POSS(BLE 7' FILI)• � 8� } � Bottan of Test Pit at 5' to 8�- 9' 70� 11� ' ]2' 73' 14� 15' ib� REMARKS: 7. Some surtace �ater was running into test pit. 2. Graunduater encountered at a depth of about 4'. 3. Vater level inside test pit stayed at a dePth of 4' uhile excavating belou thi�s depth. Due to mixing and disturbance, stratun locations and soil classifications are approximace beLou a depth of 4�. 4. Creosote ador noted fran wood lagging. G:\13172.ZS7\73172-20.RXK\REPORTS\TEST.PIT\ZS120003.fRM TEST PIT PLAN BWIDER CLASS PROPORTIONS A88REVIATIONS GRWNDYATER USED 17' LETTER 512E RANGE F = FINE (%) ENCWNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIF[CATfON M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCWNTERED - 9'� TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C : LOARSE A 6" - 78" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH � � g 18" - 36" LITTIE (L1.) 70 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35Y. GR = GRAY (HIX1R5) NATER BN = BR04N NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOV 0 4' VOU1ME _ _cu.yd E-----EASY � � M-----MODERATE � D-----DIFFICULT GZ4 GEOEIiYIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-20L Engineers/ScienCists SNEET N0. T6�T . Sio & Sho FILE N0. �3172.T" ea v, assac usects CHKD. BY: �A�— . EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. C. Basile - CONTRALTOR Amsco DATE 0.. 2/2g�q6 OPERATOR _D�onn amo�s GRWND EIEV. �f4*— WEATHER Clear 40s NAKE C+�T -Ri�E�-1Z5— TIME STARTE� �ZiiT— . CAPAC cu. . REACH ��F TIME COMPIETED —13Q�— DEPTH SAMPLE SO[L DESCRIPTIOH P[D ERCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT CWNT/ N0. (ppm) CLASS � Dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, some Silt, little E 1 misceltaneous trash, irace Or9anics, Roots (LOAM). 2' ' Z� E 3� E 1 �� E Broun, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt. 5, E b� E � �� E � Fine SAHD and SILT. . 8� E 9, E Tan S[LT, trace fine Sand near 6ottom of test pit, E 10' Bottan�of Test Pit at 10�. 17' 12' 73' 74� 15' 16' REMARKS: 1. Bag soil sample obtained fran a depth of 2' to 7�. 2. Grounduater not encountered. G:\13772.ZS1\13172•20.RMK\REPORTS\TEST.PIT\ZS120001.FRM TEST PIT PLAN BWIDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRWNDNATER USED 9' LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE ( ) ENCWNTERED DESIGNATION CLASS[FICATION � M = MEDIUM (%) NOT ENCWNTERED 5'� TRACE <TR.) 0 - 10% L = COARSE A 6�� - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTN � B 1&� - 36" LITTLE (L L,) 10 - 20X F/M = f[NE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE REAOING GRWND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HWRS) NFTER BN = BROWN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND . 35 - 50Y. YEL = YELLOV YOIUME = 16 tu.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE - D-----DIFFICUIT �'�; a 0 • : - . �y � i �. -��; � .. . - : . - . . . _ . . . } ._„ I �,: . �- :. ' . . . . . . , . . ._. „ . . _... .-., � _ � � .. . . -.; ;: ` - � i : . �� ` � . '�' � F. � M � .rJ *_ `� - � ' ��.��mw �i+rr��n-.�.�.�.w-. r.��a��rw�Y�:i�i�i�e " _ .. � . . ....�.. ........ .. ':` S • ,-.�_. — ��+��.��....�r+..�.w�vr.wr.rwv�.��.��"� �r��-�� ... �.. • ': r,j . .. � .. . �.. . ..�+�n�� . . ♦ . .. �.. . . . .. -.��_- _.___�.. . ... _ . . .- " __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ . (. � .. . ._. ' . . _ _ __ _ _ . . __ __ _ _ �. .�� M 2 { _ . '� . � . . � � � . . . ' — . . __ _ _ _ _ ,__ . .. ' . . ^y— .. . . . . . . J . . .�. . . . . ._ . . ... . � �� _ Y = � �- � 1 ' . 1 1 S +~�1� t�' , . . . . . . .. . .�.. .. . . . . . � .__. . ... ... ..........�. ... .. . � ..... .. ... '.�. e ._:«.. � ' . .y. —. . . ..._ .t..,:�r ., ! .4�i. {. . --- - --"_'--- . _ ..... ' _ -- .. .� _....... ..- --'�__.._. __... _ _.._._ _.. . .._. . ._. ._.._.. .. ,._. .. _. . . . . . . .,,. . �.-. ,..` � . . -..`. . . .. . . .. ...... ,.. -� _.._.�_�_..�+.._.. ..�. . � ' '. � � � -- - : i ' .. .. .. . ... . _ � _..��...._�"'J,.�. .: . . .. . ._ W.. � ,..t � : : 57072:5!E _ _ _._. . 40I.14 i --.. ._ __.: _ , , . _.. �. . 6 . .. . - � � ��; . . i - ` 2oZ E zs4 E � �•� GUILFORO TRANSP( tP- s �-Av �- .� s�o7 • �� _ �.m. Y .,,,,�. � � `�s L1 .. r �r- ti -- -- _.. .. _ _ .. � �� .i: � � � ` - �-'� .--�� ---" - � . " ,. � , : .�<" .. . ._ _.. i. „ . � �E i.. `1'b '� �.. . � .1 . ; � ' . _ _. � - �� . .�' ' J� � _�. _. . L . . _�.� , . . .. _ . ' ' ' - . ''. ... _ .._ ... c. ' . . _. .. . .�, c. �. ' � � ' � .� � � . . _ ... . -. ' - . � .•. ' �+�-r"+�. 'S '. ...�_. . _._� � U 1 �__ '. -...._ .. . . .. . '3 �.: - . :. . L_L�.i, .... ____`_ _ . _ .. �. � .__. .. . . . - � ' _. . , � . :. ., . . �_�. .�.._ ' ..._ _. ..... ._.. . . - _ 7 . '. ' " . � ... . . ; . r ♦ . _ .._.� -irrr+..+.e.-.--..�•.u.�r.�.—�..�.��ux�- \ ,w,t i _...�.��...___.... � 1 ,. y � _ � � .,. , � � '. _. .. � .__ � _ _ _ _ - � , � -,. - __ _.. . _ _.. --- �. i � . �, .. _ - -- I 4 F. . r 4_ ..u�.u- . .. � . :: . ....... . . . _._ _ . . . .n . _ . .. . .._ . .. _ . � I � ...� ... ..__ . . .�. ' n . .� ' . -...- - . .._ . _ . .. .- . . R . . E _ .. .. ,_ .. - �. _ c ' � � r - t - - , , ti � , , ,. ' _ ._...a.. _ _...,,._ _ � � � i : , _�_. _.._,.... . .. , . .� _ _ , ; - _ . . � ,, s � .i .. ��f t , r � -; ; .�• ' _� ,. .. ` l , m . ' i __ .. . . __ g � � _� , - . °- . .: � �,: . � , � � — ' y ' .. ' ' `t f ' i . i . . � ' . � . . i -... ._ t . �� - � _ - - � _—- ----. .�._.. . ..._ __ ,�.._ -- ---- s ._ � ,; ; _.� � . _ 5 ; � . : ..� . -� _._.. _ . .. . _ . . ° ' ` 3 -.. _ - _ _�� _ . . _ _ � . _ _ : r .. f.. . �� a - --- ;_ ; , r" �, . ; . :._,_.,,..-- � .,.. .., :-:'.:- . . ' . . . � .. ' .. . .. .#� . . ; . � i . . . . _' - 5 3 I - ., '. . � ! : � ,. � . - . '.. . ..... ' _ . . ..,_ 7 :�. . . . � . . ... . . . . �.��— ' , _. q } �•. . M.aJ �. . �� , � . s . . _. . _ :.r . .. � ;.� a : .. . .. - . ,_._. ,_ ; � .. .:.,.�---"^-• i �wxac�e' . . i .; . _" ; � . � ; . _� .._. _ . . . . � . . . . . ` .._ . . . . .... �( � : -- . : . . ... I . . $ : � �. s � . W.� . ___._��,.,...--� . � . : - . . . � r,,,,,.,,,.,.._- ._-- . . : , ; , , �., _.� _ .. T p- 20 � � ; i } -_... _ -__ .. : { � � j ; � _ � , . , . - s [ 4. ; / - - - � ; . �- � , e - -/ �3 . _ _ -- � _ , _ �. a: . . . y }. � / �� , 5.. �. �.. . � i {. , �'x . _ _ . . � Y` . . � ' i ; 3 �- � - . : .. � ..... ." "' . ' ' y 5 - I.. - : ...�r. , ' : ._��:i..-.� .i. �. . : . � �_�,::' ' : i. ` _ � , ....- +--�: . . . : i�, . .. . , . . � _ _ .... . . � " . ::. . � ' � � " ... . " S �� E� � �� . . ' . _ . :; . . . . ." . . . : � �.'_ .� r � 5 � -' . ��_,.. .i , .f _.�....- ' . ' � . . . � '"�� 0 • � I � ' � � •4� i r . ul : ti;c-. . . � - .w. �p! ,� : � y r..�-..:: 4�i �_- ��. ..�-._.1 � � . k. '� '� ' ' _ ` � d _. . i: . f;' , ^ � _ a � . � � .r� 4 i i � '—'.' � � i . . , . . r - 1� i �ti L . . j1� : F7 � '.. . . � q �! . {, .. j ;. 1 �� a � ' . �-0 .. ., y, 4 . � ."i , i ! ' r ;� }� i 1 •� , . ' 1� . . . .•� � �� . 6 . .. � � � ` . T�� ` p9 . � . . . �-.�r ,rwrw . . ' .. . . ' .. ' �y' ..� � �.. . .�:• . � .. ' ' :... �V`�Q�,,� �� ': � . � � . .� .. ' . ' . s i� �. ..: . . . . . 1 i .1 1 'i. �.' �: . - . � � : � �>.... ' .. " '� n � ... ' .. . :i 7 ' . � .-' . ' ' m , :. �..�` i:.. . .��. � !.t4., . � � � . . . �„,.••- � . . . _ : . _''.:.� .- . 4-x� � . ; a �; •. q . �,,. - /��p N6�7.G�-11�---: �_ _ ...,;_., ,,.,...,a,. _�: . - n # _ , - y, . _ K677T47'1Y . "' 67.10 { N704SJ97Y � � �. . .,. 0::. � - - - �� .�._ : �. :. . - f�' r:f:-�_�'' �. - .. . . . . \�, ..: �. � ' ._ — �- ?... . ' .. ,,.,:.'� - . . _ ._... ... . . T_ .. . y _ _ . . . . . . .. �.. ' '- �- . . . . . .. -.. . . � J ; t C " _ _ r . . . .. , ..� v . ,- . �r� � � , . �- � • a„� . y. �-..� . . ... . : � ... -. '. ��': .r � .J � .- .. ' ' ' ' . , fr ' r _ ��.r+ � . ' ' ' 3 , � . .'. . � . ,.�.. �:" . 1. �-. ..i' . . . . �. ; ' . :" ' r_- �W.W �>��rr..++ k - . - 1 '� . ' � _�T . �- ' I Y,i' � �'. � ' ' � .. �r+• �E" _ __ _ ' . � F . � �:: ,. � . . . . ��, ..J ' �_�__ " . � � t - • � , .. . .: � ' .. . . .. � . • . � . i� v . r - ; _ _______ _____ _. • ��. t ( i � ' ' . . � . . . . . . �.... y .. � , . ;.. � . � . . s�j� _ . ' . i` . . .�,r �-'.".a'_'i.�. :� . . . . ' ' / . . _ .� . . t � � . ; _ __ _ � . �. � 1 fi �... g . . _._.— _., .� , f ,; , , :, , ..;:. , ,i.,.� . , k ;. , . . .... . — � � i , ,- � , . . , . ' .. � . � ' P � . .. ' . .. ... \ ' l: ,. i Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Transponation . � Land Development Emironmental Services � 101 WalnutStreet � Post Office Box 9151 Watertown � Massachusetts 02272 617 924 1770 FAX 61�924 2286 Memorandum To: Files Date: March 7, i996 , Project No.: - 03834.26 From: Mike Tutker Re: Peabody/Salem Stop&Shop Based upon the results of the perc tests performed on 2/28/96,the drainage calculaHons,specifically the infiltration calculations were revised to retlect the actual perc rate. To be conservative,a perc rate of 8 minutes per inch(mpi)was used. The original calcularions were based on a perc rate of 5 mpi,which resulted in an allowable maxitnum infiltration rate of 3.76 cfs when calculated for the total infiltration area as proposed. When the perc rate is increased to 8 mpi,the maximum inffitrarion rate over the same infiltration area decreases to 2.17 mpi. In order to evaluate the proposed infiltration trenches with the actual perc rate,the origina11Tt20 - model was revised with an infiltrarion rate of 2.17 mpi in place of 396 mpi. The remainder of the ' input parameters were not changed. The system was then re-modeled using TR20,and the resulting storm runoff numbers are as follows: STORM FREQUENCY EXISTING ORIGINAL REVISED CONDITIONS PROPOSAL PROPOSAL 10-YEAR 20.0 161 1�.� 25-YEAR 23.6 19.4 21.0 100-YEAR 30.6 26.0 27.6 As can be seen in the above table,the runoff rate with resulting from the actual perc rates will increase over the original proposal,but the runoff rates will still be less than the existing conditions. Therefore,the infiltration system as originally proposed has adequate capacity to meet the design guidelines. The supporting calculations are attached. I \\KLL2K\LD\03&39\DOCS\MENOS\INEMEMO.DOC ; `i ' IlJJJ Project slfioP Projec[# 03'r�34 � Location =F'`3� ��M Sheet�of� ' Calculated by Mar Date 3'��"9�' i Checked by Date Title REVlSEfl 1NFn,TRR'f10N CP1l,C_5 1�C7�/t� PEC1-'C R�iE ' `� 1''1�'L ALI,D��Ci�� IrLF��'�Ps�oN RA►� F�2 `d,MP� = O� IZ 41SF�rn�N lo_iz 41SFIM,� )c ' `'��.a�� ► m,��bo sr�� = o.cooz� `'/,sF/� 'M�X � IyFi�TR�moN = ' 87�0 � . 00027 � IAxO�S+ 1.33�r2s�o�s�) = 2.17CFS '22c� M�Oe�- W i�� c. (Z�../�s FD 13�0 otJ Tl1 �s t N r-�1.TfL�,T�ar� rzaT�, �Z�`IISE� RUNOrF SUMINP�L�{ �x�s�N� PR-c�os� l�-{� Zo.ocFs Il �� c� S ZS-`{R, 23.6 �� Zl • O C�5 100-�1rL 30�b �Fs 27. 6 c�s Vanasse Hangen Brustlio,Inc. . � Printed on Rxycled Paper _ . _ _ . . __ _ _ _ _ _ ._ . _ * � TR 20 S/N . ' * TR 20 * Datefsion � 3/O5�/96 * �Ef�.3��11s�1,:�././1 � * * Time : 15:22:21 ' * Project Formulation Hydrology * Input file : 1:\03839\tech\bjt\3834d` I� ] /�/ ,�y * * Output file : 1:\03839\tech\bjt\3839d; � �=��5�� 1�� '� ` �b • � • 3�s c p c�1 I��rvw�- ................................................................................ ��c �l�T_F �8 M P�, �� x�x�x xxxxxx x�xx xxxxx I x x x x x x � x x x x x xx x x�xxx x x x x x x x x xx x x x x x xx x x x x xxxxx� ��x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Full Microcomputer Implementation . . . . . bY . . . HaesGad Methods, Inc. . . . . 37 Brookside Road • Waterbury, Connecticut Ofi708 ' (203) 755-1666 - **+*R**•*""*****80-80 LIST OF INPOT �ATA FOR TA-20 HYDAOLOGY**wxx.r...+x.i*+.* . JOB TR-20 111 � , TITLE STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM TITLE PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED HY: VHB 5 RAINFL 7 0.1 . g 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.009 , 8 0.005 0.006 0.00� 0.008 0.009 8 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.019 g 0.015 0.016 0.017 � 0.018 0.019 �, g 0.020 0.021 0.022 0.023 0.029 8 0.026 0.027 0.028 0.029 0.030 � 8 0.031 0.032 0.034 0.035 0.036 � 8 0.037 0.038 0.040 0.041 0.042 � B � 0.093 0.095 0.096 0.047 0.099 � 8 0.050 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.055 . 8 0.057 0.058 0.060 0.061 0.063 , . 8 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.069 0.070 � 8 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.077 0.079 8 0.080 0.082 0.084 0.085 0.087 . 8 0.089 0.091 0.093 � 0.095 0.097 . � S 0.100 0.103 0.106 0.109 O.112 8 0.115 0.118 0.121 0.124 0.127 8 0.130 0.139 0.137 0.190 0.199 8 0.148 0.151 0.155 0.159 0.163 8 0.167 0.171 0.176 0.180 0.185 8 0.189 0.194 0.199 0.205 0.210 ` 8 0.216 0.222 0.228 0.235 0.292 � 8 0.250 0.256 0.266 0.276 0.287 g 0.298 0.312 0.328 0.363 0.916 8 0.500 0.584 0.638 0.673 0.689 g 0 J02 0.714 0.725 0.734 0.793 � 8 0.751 0.758 0.766 0.772 0.779 8 0.785 0.790 0.796 0.801 0.806 8 O.Bll 0.816 0.821 0.825 0.829 �. 8 0.839 0.836 0.892 0.895 0.899 �, 8 0.853 0.857 0.860 0.864 0.867 I B 0.870 0.879 0.899 0.680 0.883 �il g 0.886 0.889 0.692 , 0.895 0.898 i 8 0.900 0.903 0.906 0.908 0.910 j g 0.911 0.913 0.915 0.917 0.919 - � 8 0.920 0.922 0.929 � 0.925 0.927 8 0.929 0.930 0.932 0.933 0.935 8 0.936 0.938 0.939 0.941 0.992 8 0.994 0.945 0.946 0.998 0.949 B 0.951 0.952 0.953 0.955 0.956 - B 0.957 0.958 0.960 0.961 0.962 8 0.963 0.965 0.966 0.967 0.968 ******'*********•""'80r80 LIST OF INPUT DATA (CONTINOE�)'xx==xrw.xw•.xx=..*..+ - B 0.969 0.971 0.972 0.973 0.974 � 8 0.975 0.976 0.977 0.978 0.979 8 0.981 0.982 0.983 0.984 0.985 8 0.986 0.987 0.988 0.989 0.990 8 0.991 0.992 0.993 0.994 0.995 8 0.996 0.997 0.998 0.999 1.000 . . � � 8 1.000 7.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 02 REARBAS g 7.0 00.0 0.0 � 8 ' 8.0 3.5 0.1067 8 8.6 6.8 0.177 8 8.9 12.95 0.18 9 ENDTBL � 6 RL7NOFF 1 001 1 0.00516 93 0.11 1 1 1 FAONT 6 DIVERT 6 002 1 5 2 2.17 1.0 7.1 1 1 1 1 DIVERT 6 RUNOFF 1 003 1 0.00225 98 0.11 1 1 1 HLDG �.. 6 RUNOFF 1 004 3 0.00998 87 0.41 1 1 1 REAR � 6 RESVOR 2 02 3 4 7.0 � 1 1 1 1 1 AEARHAS - 6 ADDHYD 9 005 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 FRO-HLDG 6 ADDHYD 9 006 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL , ENDATA - 7 INCREM 6 0.10 7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 4.7 1.07 2 O1 10 10-YEAA ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 5.4 1.07 2 O1 25 25-YEAR ' ENDCMP 1 7 COMPOT 7 001 006 0.0 6.8 1.07 2 O1 99 100-YEAR ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 .+..+...:::..:.«+++:.:.::::....END OF 80-80 LIST"*""*+«w*...�+.x.x+x:x:...::::.. TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PAOPOSE� CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHH PAGE 1 � COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PROSECT FORMULATION - HYDROLOGY USER NOTES THE USERS MANUAL FOR THIS PROGRAM IS THE MAY 1962 DRAFT OF TR-20. CHANGES FROM THE 2/14/79 VERSION INCLUDE: REACH ROUTING - THE MODZFIED ATT-KIN ROUTING PROCEDURE AEPLACES THE CONVEX METHOD. INPUT DATA PREPARED FOR PREVIOUS PROGRAM VERSIONS OSING CONVEX ROOTING COEFFICIENTS WILL NOT RUN ON THIS VERSION. � THE PREFERRED TYPE OF DATA ENTRY IS CROSS SECTION DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF A REACH. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE OPTIONAL CROSS SECTION DISCHARGE-AREA PLOTS BE OBTAINED WHENEVER NEW CROSS SECTION DATA IS ENTERED. � THE PLOTS SHOOLD BE CHECKED FOR REASONABLENESS AND ADEQUACY OF INPUT DATA FOR THE COMPUTATION OF "M" � VALUES USED IN THE ROUTING PROCEDORE. GUIDELINES FOR DETEAMINING OR ANALYZING REACH LENGTHS AND COEFFICSENTS (X,M) ARE AVAILABLE IN THE USERS MANOAL. SUMMARY TABLE 2 DISPLAYS REACH ROUTING RESOLTS AND ROUTING PARAMETERS FOR COMPARISON AND CHECKING. HYDROGRAPH GENERATION - THE PROCEDURE TO CALCULATE THE INTERNAL 2IME ZNCREMENT AND PEAK TZME OF THE UNIT � HYDROGRAPH HAVE BEEN IMPROVED. PEAK DISCHARGES AND TIMES MAY DIFFER FROM THE PREVIOUS VERSION. OOTPOT HYDROGRAPHS ARE STILL INTEAPOLATED, PRINTE�, AND ROUTE� AT THE USER SELECTED MAIN TIME INCREMENT. INTEAMEDIATE PEAKS - METHOD ADDED TO PROVIDE DISCHARGES AT INTERMEOIATE POINTS WITHIN REACHES WITHOUT ROUTING. - OTHER - THIS VERSION CONTAINS SOME ADDITIONS TO THE INPUT ANO NUMEROUS MODIFICATIONS TO THE OOTPUT. USER OPTIONS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED AND AUGMENTED ON THE JOB RECORD, RAINTABLES ADDED, ERROR AND WAANING MESSAGES EXPANDED, AND THE SUMMARY TAHLES COMPLETELY REVISED. THE HOLOOUT OPTION IS NOT OPERATIONAL AT THIS TIME. PROGRAM QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS SHOULD HE DIRECTED TO HYDRAULZC ENGINEEAS AT THE SCS NATIONAL TECHNICAL CENTERS: CHESTER, PA (NORTHEAST) - 215-499-3933, FORT WORTH, TX �SOUTH) -- 334-5242 (FTS) LINCOLN, NB �MIDWEST) -- 591-5318 (FTS), PORTLAND, OR (WEST) - 423-4099 (FTS) OR HYDROLOGY UNIT, ENGINEERING DNISION, LANHAM, MD -- 436-7383 (FTS) . PROGRAM CHANGES SINCE MAY 1982: 12/17/82 - CORRECT PEAR RATE FACTOR FOR USER ENTERED DIMHYD CORRECT REACH ROUTING PEAK TRAVEL TZME PAINTED WITH FULLPAINT OPTION 5/02/83 - CORRECT COMPUTATIONS FOR --- 1. DZVISION OF HASEFLOW IN DIVERT OPERATION 2. HYDROGRAPH VOLOME SPLIT BETWEEN BASEFLOW AND AHOVE BASEFLOW 3. CROSS SECTION DATA PLOTTING POSZTION � 9. ZNTERMEDIATE PEAK WHEN "FAOM" AREA IS LARGEA THAN "T}iRU" AREA 5. STORAGE ROOTED REACH TRAVEL TIME FOR MULTIPEAK HYDROGRAPH . 6. ORDERING "FLOW-FREQ" FILE FROM S[1MMARY TAHLE $3 DATA 7. BASEFLOW ENTERE� WITH READHYD 8. LOW FLOW SPLIT DOHING DIVERT PAOCEDURE #2 WHEN SECTION RATINGS START AT DIFFEAENT ELEVATIONS ENHANCEMENTS -- 1. AEPLACE USER MANOAL ERROR CODES (PAGE 9-9 TO 9-11) WITH MESSAGES 2. LABEL OOTPOT HYDROGRAPH FILES WITH CROSS SECTION/STROCTORE, ALTERNATE AND STORM NO'S 09/O1/83 - CORRECT INPOT AND OUTPUT ERRORS FOR INTERMEDIATE PEAKS CORRECT COMBINATION OF RATING TABLES FOR DIVERT CHECK REACH ROOTING PARAMETERS FOR ACCEPTAHLE LIMITS ELIMINATE MINIMOM REACH TRAVEL TIME WHEN ATT-KIN COEFFICIENT EQUALS ONE TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 2 � EXECOTNE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOOR& . . RECORD ID � EXECOTNE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM XSECTZON 1 TO XSECTION 6 RECORD ID 10-YEAR STARTZNG TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 9.70 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAZN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=10 MAIN TIME INCAEMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION Rt1NOFF CROSS SECTION 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE�CFS) � PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.OB 12.30 1R[1NOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS �RAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 , � � 4.00 DISCHG .02 .04 .03 .02 .OS .09 � .03 .06 .04 .04 �i 5.00 DISCHG .07 .OS .07 .OS .08 .06 .09 .O6 .09 .07 6.00 DZSCHG .10 .11 .07 .11 .12 .08 .11 .13 .OB .12 7.00 DZSCHG .19 .14 .15 .15 �.15 .21 .29 .25 .25 .26 8.00 DZSCHG .26 .27 .27 .28 .28 .29 .36 .32 .30 .38 9.00 DISCHG .41 .34 .40 .92 .93 .94 .94 .53 .48 .55 10.00 nISCHG .49 .56 .59 .68 .63 .70 .93 .79 .84 .88 11.00 DISCHG .99 1.03 1.04 1.29 1.91 1.47 1.78 2.11 9.16 6.78 . 12.00 DISCHG 10.91 12.21 9.14 6.03 3.18 2.13 1.86 1.70 1.44 1.36 13.00 DISCHG 1.25 1.30 1.18 .98 1.03 .99 .80 .87 .79 .76 14.00 OISCHG .76 .76 .76 .65 .fil .72 .69 .61 .49 .57 15.00 DISCHG .61 .61 .50 .57 .49 .96 .57 .49 .96 .96 16.00 DISCHG .46 .96 .46 .96 .46 .39 .92 .95 .39 .31 17.00 DISCHG .19 .27 .30 .31 .31 .19 .27 .30 .19 .27 18.00 DISCHG .30 .19 .27 .19 .27 .79 .27 .19 .27 .19 19.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .27 .19 .27 .19 .16 .29 .19 20.00 DISCHG .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 21.00 DISCHG .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 - .15 22.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 ..15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 29.00 DISCHG .04 .00 RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.90 WATERSHED INCHES, 12.97 CFS-HRS, 1.07 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPEAATION DIVERT CROSS SECTION 2 ' PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION�FEET) 11.80 2.17* (DIVERT) • FIRST POINT OF FLAT PEAK OUTPUT #1 HYDROGRAPH TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME TNCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AAEA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 . TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 � REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 3 , . 9.00 DISCHG .02 .04 .03 .02 .OS .09 .03 .06 .09 .04 5.00 DISCHG .07 .OS .07 .OS .08 .06 .09 .O6 .09 .07 . 6.00 DISCHG .10 � .11 .07 .11 .12 .OB .11 .13 .08 .12 � 7.00 DISCHG .14 .19 .15 .15 .15 .21 .29 .25 .25 .26 8.00 DISCHG .26 .27 .27 .28 .28 .29 .36 .32 .30 .38 � 9.00 DISCHG .91 .39 .90 .92 .43 .99 .94 .53 .98 .55 10.00 DISCHG .49 .56 .59 .68 .63 .70 .93 .79 .84 .88 11.00 DISCHG .99 1.03 1.09 1.29 1.41 1.97 1.78 2.11 2.17 2.17 � 12.00 DISCHG 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.13 1.86 1.70 1.94 1.36 13.00 DISCHG 1.25 1.10 1.18 .98 1.03 .99 .80 .87 .79 .76 14.00 DISCHG .76 .76 .76 .65 .61 .92 . .69 .61 .49 .57 15.00 DISCHG .61 . .61 .50 .57 .99 .46 .57 .99 .46 .96 16.00 DISCHG .46 .96 .96 .96 .46 .34 .92 .95 .39 .31 . 17.00 DISCHG .19 .29 .30 .31 .31 .19 .29 .30 .19 .27 18.00 DISCHG .30 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 19.00 DZSCHG .27 .19 .16 .27 .19 .27 .19 .16 .27 .19 20.00 DISCHG .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 . 21.00 DISCHG .15 .27 .19 .16� .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 . '.. 22.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 ii 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 '�I 24.00 DISCHG .09 .00 � ' RONOFF VOLOME AHOVE HASEFLOW = 2.78 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.26 CFS-HRS, .76 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS ' PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE�CFS) PEAR ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 10.13 (DIVERT) OOTPUT N2 DIVERTED HYDROGRAPH, CAOSS SECTION = 7 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.99 9.61 12.00 DISCHG 8.74 10.09 6.97 3.86 1.01 .00 RUNOFF VOLOME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 2.78 WATERSHED INCHES, 3.73 CFS-HRS, .31 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS � OPERATION AUNOFF CROSS SECTION 3 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 5.70 (RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .Ol .02 .02 � .02 .02 2.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .O6 .04 .04 .04 .04 3.00 DISCHG .04 .04 _07 .OS .09 .09 .09 .08 .06 .OS 4.00 DISCHG .OS .OB .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS 5.00 oISCHG .09 .07 .09 .07 .10 .09 .10 .07 .10 .07 6.00 DISCHG .10 .11 .07 .10 .11 .07 .10 .12 .07 .10 TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: -VHB � � PAGE 9 _ 7.00 DISCHG .12 .12 .12 .12 .12 .17 .18 .18 .19 ' .19 B.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .29 .21 .19 .24 . � 9.00 DISCHG .26 .21 .29 .26 .26 .26 .26 .31 .28 .31 10.00 DISCHG .28 .31 .33 .38 .35 .38 .40 .90 .95 .46 11.00 � DISCHG .52 , .53 .53 .63 .72 .74 .89 1.09 2.03 3.25 12.00 DISCHG 5.13 5.64 4.18 2.74 1.44 .96 .84 .77 .65 .61 � 13.00 DISCHG .56 .49 .53 .94 .46 .92 .36 .39 .36 .39 19.00 DISCHG .34 .39 .39 .29 .27 .32 .29 .27 .22 .26 15.00 DISCHG .27 .27 .22 .26 .22 .21 .26 .22 .21 .20 16.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .15 .1�9 .20 .15 .14 17.00 DISCHG .09 .12 .13 .19 .19 .09 .12 .13 .09 .12 , 18.00 DISCHG .13 .09 .12 .08 .12 .OB .12 .OB .12 .08 '� 19.00 DISCHG .12 .OB .0� .12 .08 .12 .08 .07 .12 .08 20.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .08 .07 .07 .12 .OB .07 .07 21.00 DISCHG .�07 .12 .08 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 22.00 .DISCHG .12 .OB .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 23.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 � RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.45 WATERSHED INCHES, 6.97 CFS-HRS, .53 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 9 � PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAR DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.29 7.01 (RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DAAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 7.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .03 .04 .09 .09 .OS .O6 .07 .OB 8.00 DISCHG .09 .09 .10 .10 .11 .11 .12 .13 .14 .14 9.00 DZSCHG .16 .17 .18 .18 .19 .21 .22 .23 .24 .26 10.00 DISCHG .27 .28 .29 .31 .34 .36 .38 .91 .93 .46 11.00 DISCHG .50 .55 .59 .69 .70 .79 .89 1.02 1.30 1.99 12.00 DTSCHG 3.16 4.95 6.53 7.00 6.27 4.92 3.62 2.67 2.08 1.69 13.00 DISCHG 1.43 1.24 1.10 1.01 .93 .88 .82 .77 .73 .70 19.00 DISCHG .67 .65 .63 .62 .59 .56 .55 .55 .52 .49 15.00 DISCHG .97 .48 .48 .99 .45 .99 .92 .92 .92 .91 16.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .38 .38 .38 .37 .35 .34 .39 .33 17.00 DISCHG .29 .25 .23 .23 .24 .24 .22 .22 .22 .21 16.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .21 .20 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 � � 19.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .18 .17 .17 .18 .18 .18 .17 .17 20.00 DISCHG .17 .16 .15 .16 .17 .16 .15 .16 .17 .16 21.00 DISCHG' .19 .14 .16 .16 .15 .14 .13 .13 .13 .13 22.D0 DISCHG .14 .15 .16 .15, .14 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 23.00 DISCHG .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 29.00 DISCHG .12 .09 .06 .03 .02 .O1 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 3.28 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.99 CFS-HRS, .78 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHH PAGE 5 - OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 2 � PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK �ISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) �� 12.50 5.07 8.29 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 6.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .09 .OS .OS 7.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.02 8.00 DISCHG .06 .07 .OB .OB .09 .09 .10 .11 .11 .12 8.00 ELEV 7.02 7.02 �.02 7.02 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 9.00 DISCHG .13 .14 .19 .15 .16 .17 .18 .19 .20 .21 9.00 ELEV 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.05 �.OS 7.05 7.05 9.06 7.06 10.00 DISCHG .23 .24 .25 .26 .28 .29 .31 .33 .35 .38 � 10.00 ELEV 7.06 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.08 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.10 7.11 11.00 DISCHG .40 .93 .46 .50 .59 .59 .65 .72 .83 1.02 11.00 ELEV 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.17 7.19 7.21 7.29 7.29 12.00 DISCHG 1.38 2.02 2.91 3.95 9.82 5.07 4.81 4.27 3.65 3.19 ' 12.00 ELEV 7.40 7.58 7.83 8.08 8.24 8.29 8.24 8.19 8.03 7.91 13.00 DISCHG 2.80 2.95 2.15 1.88 1.67 1.98 1.33 1.21 1.10 1.01 . � 13.00 ELEV 7.80 7.70. 7.61 7.59 7.98 7.92 7.38 7.34 7.31 �.29 14.00 DISCHG .93 .86 .87 .77 .73 .69 .66 .63 .61 .59 19.00 ELEV 7.27 7.25 7.23 7.22 7.21 7.20 7.19 7.16 7.17 7.17 15.00 DISCHG .56 .54 .53 .51 .50 .99 .97 .46 .95 .49 ' 15.00 ELEV 7.16 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.14 7.14 7.19 7.13 7.13 7.13 � 16.00 DISCHG .43 .92 .91 .41 .90 .39 .38 .38 .37 .36 16.00 ELEV 7.12 �.12 7.12 7.12 7.11 �.11 7.11 7.11 7.11 7.10 17.00 DISCHG .35 .33 .31 .29 .28 .27 .26 .25 .24 .29 17.00 ELEV 7.10 7.09 7.09 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.07 7.0� 7.07 7.07 � 18.00 DISCHG .23 .22 .22 .22 .21 .21 .20 .20 .20 .20 18.00 ELEV 7.07 9.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 9.06 7.06 � 7.06 7.06 7.06 . 19.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 � 19.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.D5 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 20.00 DISCHG .18 .17 .17 .17 .17 .16 .16 .16 .16 .16� 20.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 21.00 DISCHG .16 .15 .15 .16 .16 .15 .15 .15 .19 .14 � 21.00 ELEV 7.05 �.04 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.09 22.00 ❑ISCHG .19 .14 .14 .15 .15 .19 .19 .19 .19 .13 . � 22.00 ELEV 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.09 23.00 DZSCHG .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 23.00 ELEV 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.04 24.00 DISCHG .13 .12 .11 .10 .OS .06 .OS .04 .03 .02 . 29.00 ELEV 7.09 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.02 7.02 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 25.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM 70B 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITZONS PREPARED BY: VHH PAGE 6 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 3.28 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.48 CFS-HRS, .78 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS ' OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 5 PEAR TIME(HRS) PBAK DISCHAftGE�CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 15.82 (NULL) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCAEMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 2.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .06 .09 .09 .09 .09 3.00 DISCHG .09 .09 .07 .OS .09 .09 .09 .08 .06 .OS 4.00 DISCHG .OS .OB .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .09 .07 .09 .07 .10 .07 .10 .07 .10 .07 6.00 OISCHG .10 .11 .07 .10 .11 .07 .10 .12 .07 .10 7.00 DISCHG .12 .12 .12 .12 .12 .17 .18 .18 .19 .19 � ' 8.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .29 .21 .19 .24 9.00 DISCHG .26 .21 .29 .26 .26 .26 .26 .31 .28 .31 10.00 DISCHG .28 .31 .33 .38 .35 .38 .90 .40 .45 .96 11.00 DISCHG .52 .53 .53 .63 � .72 .79 .89 1.04 4.02 7.86 12.00 DISCHG 13.87 15.66 11.19 6.60 2.95 .96 .89 .77 .65 .61 13.00 DISCHG .56 .49 .53 .94 .96 .42 .36 .39 .36 .34 74.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .39 .29 .27 .32 .29 .27 .22 .26 � 15.00 DISCHG .27 .27 .22 .26 .22 .21 .26 .22 .21 .20 1fi.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .15 .19 .20 .15 .14 I 19.00 DISCHG .09 .12 .13 .19 .14 .09 .12 .13 .09 .12 18.00 DISCHG .13 .09 .12 .08 .12 .08 .12 .OB .12 .08 19.00 DISCHG .12 .08 .07 .12 .OB .12 .08 .07 .12 .08 20.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .OB .07 .07 .12 .AS .09 .07 21.00 DISCHG .07 .12 .08 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 � 22.00 DISCHG .12 .OB .07 .0� .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 23.00 DISCHG .07 .0� .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 7.01 WATERSHED INCHES, 10.18 CFS-HRS, .89 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION AD�HYD CROSS SECTION 6 PEAA TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATZON(FEET) 12.09 17.93 (NULL) � TIME(HRS) � FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCAEMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MZ. 1.00 �ISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 2.00 DTSCHG .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .06 .09 .04 .04 .09 3.00 DISCHG .09 .04 .07 .OS .09 .04 .04 .08 .06 .OS 4.00 DISCHG .OS .OB .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .09 .07 .09 .07 .10 .07 .10 .07 .30 .07 TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM SOB 1 PASS 1 � REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 7 ' 6.00 DISCHG .10 .11 .07 .10 .12 .OB .11 .13 .09 .12 7.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .19 .15 .15 .20 .22 .23 .23 .24 8.00 DISCHG .25 .26 .26 .27 .28 .28 .34 .31 , .31 .36 9.00 DISCHG .38 .35 � .39 .91 .42 .43 .94- .50 .98 .53 10.00 DISCHG .50 .55 .58 .fi9 .62 .68 .71 - .73 .80 .84 11.00 DISCHG .92 .96 1.00 1.13 1.26 1.33 1.59 � 1.76 9.85 8.87 12.00 DISCHG 15.25 17.70 19.05 10.55 7.27 6.09 5.65 5.09 9.30 3.80 13.00 DISCHG 3.36 2.95 2.67 2.33 2.13 1.91 1.69 1.60 1.45 1.35 19.00 DISCHG - 1.27 1.20 1.15 1.05 1.00 1.01 .95 .91 .83 .84 15.00 DISCHG .83 .81 .75 .77 J2 .69 .73 .68 .66 .65 16.00 DISCHG .69 .63 .62 .61 .60 .55 .57 .58 .52 .50 '� 17.00 DISCHG .93 .45 .99 .43 .91 .35 ,38 .38 .33 .36 18.00 DISCHG .36 .31 .39 .30 .33 .29 .32 .29 .32 .28 . 19.00 DISCHG .31 .28 .26 .31 .27 .30 .27 .25 .30 .26 20.00 DISCHG .25 .24 .29 .25 .29 .23 .28 .29 .23 .23 21.00 DISCHG .23 .27 .24 .22 .22 .22 .22 .21 .21 .21 22.00 DISCHG .26 .22 .21 .21 .21 .27 .21 .21 .20 ,20 � 23.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 � 29.00 oISCHG .14 .12 .11 .10 .OB .06 .OS .09 .03 .02 25.00 �ISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.53 WATERSHED INCHES, 19.67 CFS-HRS, 1.63 ACAE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECOTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPOTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 RECOR� ID . . EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 6 RECORD ID 25-YEAR STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 5.40 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=25 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 1 � PEAK TIME�HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 72.08 14.33 (RUNOFF� � . TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .04 .03 .03 4.00 DISCHG .03 .06 .OS .09 .07 .OS .OS .08 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .10 .07 .10 .08 .11 .08 .12 , .09 .13 .09 6.00 DISCHG .13 .15 .10 .19 .16 .10 .15 .17 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .19 .19 .20 .27 .30 .31 .32 .32 8.00 DISCHG .33 .34 .34 .35 .35 .36 .45 .39 .37 .97 9.00 DISCHG .50 .92 .99 .52 .53 .53 .54 .65 .58 .66 � � 10.00 DISCHG .59 .67 .71 .83 .76 .84 .88 .89 1.01 1.05 � � ll.00 DISCHG 1.18 1.22 1.23 1.48 1.68 1.79 2.11 2.99 4.90 7.95 TA20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM - JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPAAED BY: VHB PpGE 8 � 12.00 DISCHG 12.75 14.21 10.61 7.00 3.69 2.97 2.15 1.97 1.fi6 1.58 . 13.00 DISCHG 1.49 1.27 1.36 1.14 1.19 1.09 .92 1.01 .92 .88 14.00 . DISCHG .68 .88 .88 .75 .71 .83 .79 .71 .57 .66 15.00 DISCHG .70 .�0 .57 .66 .57 .53 .66 .57 .53 .53 16.00 DSSCHG .53 .53 .53 .53 .53 .40 .99 .52 .90 .36 17.00 DISCHG .22 .31 .35 .35 .35 .22 .31 .35 .22 .31 18.00 DISCHG .35 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 � 19.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 20.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 21.00 DISCHG .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 22.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .18 .18 � .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 23.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 24.00 DISCHG .04 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.58 WATERSHED INCHES, 15.26 CFS-HRS, 1.26 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS � OPERATION DIVERT CROSS SECTION 2 '�* WARNING-NO PEAK FOUND, MAXIMUM DISCHARGE _ .18 CFS. I PEAK TIME�HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATZON(FEET) . , 23.70 .18 �DIVERT) 11.70 2.17 � (DNERT) OUTPUT N1 HYDROGRAPH � TIME(HRSI FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .04 .03 .03 4.00 DISCHG .03 .06 .OS .09 .07 .OS .OS .08 .06 � .OS 5.00 �ISCHG .10 .07 .10 .08 .11 .08 .12 .09 .13 .09 6.00 DISCHG .13 .15 .10 .19 .16 .10 .15 .17 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .19 .19 .20 .27 .30 .31 .32 .32 8.00 DISCHG .33 .39 .39 .35 .35 .36 .45 .39 .37 .97 9.00 DISCHG .50 .92 .49 .52 .53 .53 .54 .65 .58 .66 10.00 DISCHG .59 .67 .71 .83 .76 .84 .88 .89 1.01 1.05 11.00 DISCHG 1.18 1.22 1.23 1.98 1.68 1.74 2.11 2.17 2.17 2.17 12.00 DISCHG 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.15 1.97 1.66 1.58 � 13.00 DISCHG 1.99 1.27 1.36 1.14 1.19 1.09 .92 1.01 .92 .88 14.00 DISCHG .88 . .88 .88 .75 .71� .83 .79 .71 .57 .66 15.00 DISCHG .70 .70 .57 .66 .57 .53 .66 .57 .53 .53 16.00 DISCHG .53 .53 .53 .53 .53 .90 .99 .52 .40 .36 17.00 DISCHG .22 .31 .35 .35 .35 .22 .31 .35 .22 .31 18.00 DISCHG .35 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 19.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 .31 .22 .18 .31 . .22 20.00 DISCHG .16 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 21.00 DISCHG .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 22.00 DISCHG � .31 .22 .18 .18 .18 .16 .18 .18 .18 .18 23.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 24.00 DISCHG .04 .00 TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/63 � PROPOSED CONDITIONS PAEPARED BY: VHB PAGE 9 � RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.18 WATERSHED INCHES, 10.60 CFS-HRS, .88 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 12.16 (DIVERT) - OOTPUT #2 DNERTED HYDROGRAPH, CROSS SECTION = 7 . TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DAAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .32 2.73 5.78 12.00 DISCHG 10.58 12.09 8.49 4.83 1.52 .30 .00 AUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.18 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.65 CFS-HRS, .38 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 3 . �, PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK EGEVATION(FEET) �I 12.08 6.56 (RONOFF) - TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AAEA = .00 SQ.MI. �I 1.00 DZSCHG .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .09 .09 .09 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS 3.00 �ISCHG .OS .OS .09 .06 .OS .OS .OS .70 .07 , .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .10 .07 .06 .10 .07 .06 .11 .OB .O6 5.00 DISCHG .11 .OB - .11 .08 .12 .08 .12 .OB .12 .OB ' 6.00 DISCHG .12 .13 .09 .12 .19 .09 .12 .19 .09 .12 7.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .14 .14 .14 .20 .21 .22 .22 .22 8.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .28 .29 .22 .28 9.00 DISCHG .30 .29 .28 .30 .30 .30 .30 .36 .32 .36 10.00 DISCHG .32 .36 .38 .44 .90 .94 .46 .96 .52 .54 11.00 OISCHG .60 .61 .62 .73 .83 .85 1.02 1.20 2.34 3.79 12.00 DISCHG 5.90 6.49 9.80 3.15 1.66 1.11 .96 .88 .74 .71 13.00 DISCHG .65 .57 .61 .51 .53 .49 .41 .45 .41 .39 . 14.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .39 .33 .31 .37 .33 .31 .25 .29 15.00 DISCHG .31 .31 .25 .29 .25 .29 .29 .25 .29 .23 16.00 DISCHG .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .18 .22 .23 .18 .16 17.00 DISCHG .10 .19 .15 .16 .16 .10 .19 .15 .10 .14 18.00 DISCHG .15 .10 .14 .10 .14 .10 .14 .10 .19 .10 19.00 DISCHG .14 .10 .08 .14 .10 .19 .10 .OS .14 .10 20.00 DISCHG .08 .08 .14 .10 .08 .08 .19 ' .10 .OB .08 21.00 DZSCHG .OB .14 .10 .OB .08 -.08 .OB .08 .OB .09 22.00 DISCHG .14 .10 .OB .OB .OB .OB .OB .OB .OB .OB 23.00 DISCHG .OS .OB .OB .08 .OB .OB .OB .OB .08 .08 29.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME AHOVE HASEFLOW = 5.15 WATERSHEO INCHES, 7.48 CFS-HRS, .62 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP 6 SHOP PEABODY SALEM - JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 10 � OPERATZON RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 9 � . PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.29 8.35 (R[1NOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS � DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 � 6.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .09 .04 .04 .09 7.00 DISCHG .OS _OS .06 .06 .07 .07 .08 .10 .11 .12 � 8.00 DISCHG .13 .14 � .14 .15 .16 .16 .17 .18 .19 .20 9.00 DISCHG .21 .23 .29 .25 .26 .28 .29 .30 .32 .34 10.00 DISCHG .35 .36 � .38 .40 .94 .96 .99 .52 , .55 .59 . 11.00 DISCHG .63 .69 ."74 .79 .88 .98 1.10 1.26 1.59 2.39 12.00 DISCHG 3.83 5.97 7.82 8.39 7.45 5.84 4.28 3.15 2.95 1.99 13.00 DISCHG 1.68 1.46 - 1.30 1.18 1.09 1.03 .97 � .90 .85 .82 I 14.00 DISCHG .78 �.76 .79 .72 .69 .66 .65 .69 .61 .57 15.00 DISCHG .55 .56 .56 .59 .53 .51 .50 .49 .49 .48 16.00 DISCHG .46 .95 .49 .94 .99 .43 .91- .40 .40 .38 17.00 DISCHG .34 .30 .27 .27 .28 .28 .26 .25 .25 .25 18.00 DISCHG .24 .25 .29 .23 .23 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 19.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .21 .20 .20 .21 .22 .21 .20 .20 20.00 DISCHG .20 .19 .18 .19 .19 ' .18 .18 .19 .19 .18 21.00 DSSCHG .17 .17 .18 .19 .18 .17 .16 15 .15 .15 ' 22.00 ➢ISCHG .16 .18 .19 .18 .16 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 24.00 DISCHG .19 .11 .07 .04 .02 .O1 .O1 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME AHOVE BASEFLOW = 3.99 WATERSHED INCHES, 11.39 CFS-HRS, .94 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.49 6.17 8.99 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MZ. 5.00 �ISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 5.00 ELEV 7.00 7�.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 � , 6.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.00 DISCHG .04 .04 .09 .OS .OS .OS .06 .07 .OB .09 7.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 . 7.01 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 8.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .11 _ .12 .13 .19 .14 .15 .16 .17 8.00 ELEV 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.04 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.05 7.05 9.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .20 .21 .22 .23 .24 ' .26 .27 .28 9.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.08 7.08 10.00 DISCHG .30 . .31 .33 .34 .36 .38 .40 .93 .45 .98 TA20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM � , JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED WNDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHH PAGE 11 . 10.00 ELEV 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.10 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.12 7.13 7.19 11.00 DISCHG .51 .55 .59 .63 .68 .79 .81 .90 1.03 1.25 11.00 ELEV 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.21 7.23 7.26 7.29 7.36 12.00 DISCHG 1.70 2.96 3.52 5.00 5.99 6.17 5.81 5.13 9.37 3.67 12.00 ELEV 7.48 7.70 8.00 8.27 8.99 8.99 8.42 8.30 8.16 8.03 13.00 DISCHG 3.19 2.80 2.96 2.17 1.92 1.72 1.55 1.90 1.26 1.17 13.00 ELEV 7.91 7.80 7.70 7.62 7.55 7.99 7.49 7.40 7.36 7.33 . 19.00 DISCHG 1.06 1.01 .95 .89 .85 .el .77 .74 .71 .68 19.0� ELEV 7.31 7.29 7.27 7.26 7.29 7.23 7.22 7.21 7.20 7.20 15.00 DISCHG .66 .63 .61 .60 .58 .57 .55 .59 .53 .52 15.00 ELEV 7.19 7.18 7.18 7.17 7.17 7.16 7.16 7.15 7.15 7.15 16.00 DISCHG .51 .49 .48 .97 .47 .46 .95 .94 .43 .42 16.00 ELEV 7.14 7.14 7.19 7.14 7.13 7.13 7.13 7.13 7.12 7.12 , 17.00 DISCHG .91 .39 .36 .39 .32 .31 .30 .29 .28 .27 ��i 17.00 ELEv 7.12 7.11 7.10 7.10 7.09 7.09 7.09 �.OS 7.08 7.08 18.00 DISCHG .27 .26 .26 .25 .25 .24 .24 .23 .23 .23 18.00 ELEV 7.08 7.0� � 7.07 7.07 7.07 �.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 � � 19.00 DISCHG .23 .23 � .22 .22 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21 19.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 20.00 DISCHG .21 .20 .20 .19 .19 .19 .79 .19 .19 .19 20.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 �.OS 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 21.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .17 .17 .16 21.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 22.00 DISCHG .16 .16 .17 .17 .17 .17 .17 .16 .16 .16 22.00 -ELEV �.OS 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.09 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 23.00 ELEV 7.04 �.09 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.04 �� 29.00 DISCHG .15 .19 .13 .11 .09 .07 .06 .04 .03 .03 . � - 24.00 ELEV 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.03 7.03 7.02 7.02 7.01 7.01 7.01 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 25.00 ELEV 7.01 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.94 WATERSHED INCHES, 11.39 CFS-HRS, .94 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 5 PEAK TIME(HRS) - PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 18.71 (N�LL) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .O1 � .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .04 .09 .09 .07 .05 .OS .OS ' .OS 3.00 DZSCHG .OS .OS .09 .06 .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 9.00 DISCHG .O6 .10 .07 .06 .10 .07 .06 .11 .OB .O6 5.00 DISCHG .11 .08 .11 .08 .12 .OB .12 .OB .12 .08 6.00 DISCHG .12 .13 .09 .12 .14 .09 .12 .19 .09 .12 7.00 DISCHG .19 .14 .14 .19 .14 .20 .21 � .22 .22 .22 8.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .28 .29 .22 .28 TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 2 . REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB _ PAGE 72 � 9.00 DISCHG .30 .29 .28 .30 .30 .30 .30 .36 .32 .36 10.00 DSSCHG .32 .36 .38 .94 .90 .49 .46 .46 .52 .59 11.00 DISCHG .60 .61 .62 .73 .83 .85 1.02 1.52 5.09 9.53 12.00 DISCHG 16.98 18.53 13.25 7.98 3.17 1.40 .96 .88 .74 .71 . 13.00 DISCHG .65 .57 .61 .51 .53 .49 .91 .95 .91 .39 19.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .39 .33 .31 .37 .33 .31 .25 .29 15.00 DISCHG .31 .31 .25 .29 .25 .29 .29 .25 .24 .23 16.00 DISCHG .23 .23 .23 . .23 .23 .18 .22 .23 .18 .16 17.00 DISCHG .10 .14 .15 .16 .16 .10 .19 .15 .10 .19 18.00 DISCHG .15 .10 .19 .10 .19 .10 .14 .10 .14 .10 19.00 OISCHG .14 .10 .08 � .19 .10 .19 .10 .08 .14 .10 20.00 DISCHG .OB .08 .14 .10 .08 .08 .14 .10 .OB .OB 21.00 DISCHG .08 .14 .10 .OB .08 .OB .08 .OB .OB .08 22.00 DISCHG .19 .10 .OB .OB .08 .OB .OS .OB .08 .08 23.00 DISCHG ' .08 .OB � .OB .OB .OB .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 8.36 WATERSHED INCHES, 12.14 CFS-HRS, 1.00 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 6 - ' PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION�FEET) 12.09 21.03 (NULL) TIME(HRS) FIRST� HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .04 .09 .09 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS 3.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .09 .06 .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .10 .07 .06 .10 .07 .06 - .11 .08 .06 5.00 DISCHG .11 .08 .11 .08 .12 .OB .12 .08 .12 .09 6.00 DISCHG .13 .15 .10 .19 .16 .11 .15 .17 .12 .16 7.00 DISCHG � .18 .18 .18 .19 .19 .25 .27 .28 .29 .30 8.00 DISCHG .31 .32 .33 .39 .35 .36 .42 .39 .38 .45 9.00 DISCHG .47 .93 .48 .51 .52 .53 .59 .61 .59 .64 10.00' DISCHG .62 .67 .71 .78 J6 .82 .86 .89 .97 1.02 11.00 DISCHG 1.11 1.16 1.20 1.36 1.51 1.59 1.83 2.92 6.70 10.78 12.00 DISCHG 18.17 20.99 16.77 12.98 9.12 7.57 6.77 6.01 5.12 4.38 ' 13.00 DISCHG 3.83 3.3� 3.07 2.68 2.95 2.20 1.96 1.85 1.68 1.56 19.00 DISCHG 1.97 1.90 1.39 1.23 1.16 1.18 1.10 1.05 .97 .98 15.00 DISCHG .97 .99 .87 .89 .84 .81 .85 .79 .76 .75 16.00 DISCHG .74 .73 .72 J1 .70 .63 .67 .67 .61 .58 17.00 DISCHG .50 .52 .52 .50 .48 .41 .44 .45 .38 .41 18.00 DISCHG .42 .36 .40 .35 .39 .39 .38 .33 .37 .33 19.00 �ISCHG � .37 .32 .30 .36 .31 .35 .31 .29 .35 .30 20.00 DISCHG .29 .28 .33 .29 .27 .27 .33 .28 .27 .27 21.00 DISCHG .26 .32 .28 .26 .26 .26 .25 .25 .24 .29 22.00 DISCHG .30 .26 .25 .25 .25 .25 .24 .29 .29 .23 23.00 OISCHG .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 � .23 .23 .23 - TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEAHODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 13 . 29.00 DISCHG .17 .14 .13 .11 .09 .07 .06 .04 - .03 .03 � 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 ' RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 5.42 WATEASHED INCHES, 23.53 CFS-HRS, 1.99 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECOTNE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PA55 2 RECORD ID EXECUTZVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 6 RECORD ID 100-YEAR � STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 6.80 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 � ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=99 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION RONOFF CROSS SECTION 1 � � PEAK TIME(HRS� PEAK DISCHARGE�CFS) PEAK ELEVATION�FEET) 12.08 18.35 (RONOFF) . TZME(HRS) , FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 2.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 3.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .12 .09 .OB .13 .10 .08 .15 .11 .09 5.00 DISCHG .16 .12 .17 .12 .18 .13 .19 .19 .20 .14 ' 6.00 DISCHG .21 .24 .15 .22 .25 .16 .23 .26 .17 .29 7.00 DSSCHG .27 .28 .28 .29 .29 .90 .49 .45 .46 .97 8.00 DISCHG .47 .48 .48 .99 .50 .50 .63 .55 .52 .65 9.00 DISCHG .70 .58 .67 .72 .73 .73 .79 .88 .'79 .90 10.00 DISCHG .80 .91 .96 1.71 1.02 1.13 1.18 1.19 1.39 1.90 - 11.00 DISCHG 1.56 - 1.61 1.63 1.99 2.20 2.27 2.76 3.29 6.39 10.29 12.00 DISCHG � 16.90 ' 18.20 13.55 8.92 4.69 3.19 2.73 .2.50 2.12 2.01 13.00 DISCHG 1.83 1.62 1.73 1.49 1.51 1.39 1.17 1.28 1.17 1.12 14.00 DISCHG 1.11 1.11 1.11 .95 .90 1.06 .99 .90 .73 .84 15.00 DISCHG .89 .89 .73 .89 .72 .68 .89 .72 .67 .67 16.00 DISCHG .67 .67 .67 .67 ' .67 .50 .62 .66 .50 .45 17.00 DISCHG .28 .40 .44 .95 .95 .28 .90 .44 .28 .40 18.00 DISCHG , .49 .28 .90 .28 .40 .28 .40 .28 .40 .28 � 19.00 DISCHG .90 .28 .23 .39 .28 .39 .28 .23 .39 .28 20.00 DISCHG .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 ' 21.00 DISCHG .22 .39 .28 - .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 22.00 DISCHG .39 .28 .23 � .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .2y 23.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 24.00 DISCHG .06 .00 - AONOFF VOLOME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 5.96 WATERSHED INCHES, 19.85 CFS-HRS, 1.69 ACAE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEAHODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 3 ' REV 09/O1/83 PAOPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB - PAGE 19 � OPERATION �IVERT CROSS SECTION 2 � ^�* WARNING-NO PEAK FOOND, MARIMUM DISCHARGE _ .22 CFS. PEAK TZME(HRS) PEAR DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 23.70 .22 (DIVERT) 11.90 2.17 (DIVERT) OUTPOT $1 HYDROGRAPH TIME(HRS) FIAST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 ROURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 2.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 3.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 4:00 DISCHG .06 .12 .09 .O8 .13 .10 .OB .15 .11 � .09 . 5.00 DISCHG .16 .12 .17 .12 .18 .13 .19 .19 .20 .14 6.00 DISCHG .21 .29 - .15 .22 .25 .16 .23 .26 .17 .24 7.00 DISCHG� .27 �.28 .28 .29 .29 .40 .99 .95 .46 .97 8.00 DISCHG .97 .48 .48 .49 .50 .50 .63 .55 .52 .65 9.00 DISCHG .70 .58 .67 .72 .73 .73 .74 .88 .79 .90 10.00 DISCHG .80 .91 .96 1.11 1.02 1.13 1.18 1.19 1.34 1.40 11.00 DISCHG 1.56 1.61 1.63 1.99 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 12.00 DISCHG 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.12 2.01 �. 13.00 DISCHG 1.83 1.62 1.73 1.94 1.51 1.39 1.17 � 1.28 1.17 1.12 , 14.00 DISCHG l.11 . 1.I1 1.11 .95 .90 1.06 .99 .90 .73 ,89 . ��, 15.00 DISCHG .89 .89 .73 .84 .72 .68 .84 .72 .69 .67 I 16.00 DISCHG .69 .67 .67 .67 .67 .50 .62 .66 .50 .45 � 17.00 DISCHG .28 - .40 .49 .45 .95 .28 .40 .44 .28 .90 18.00 DSSCHG .94 .28 .90 .28 .40 .28 .40 .28 .40 .28 19.00 DISCHG .40 .28 .23 .39 .28 .39 .28 .23 .39 .28 . 20.00 DISCHG .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 21.00 DISCHG .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 22.00 DISCHG .39 .28 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 23.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 ..22 .22 24.00 DISCHG .06 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.95 WATERSHED INCHES, 13.17 CFS-HRS, 1.09 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK �ISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION�FEET) 12.08 16.18 (DIVERT) . OUTPUT N2 DNERTED HYDROGRAPH, CROSS SECTION = 7 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .03 .10 .59 1.07 9.20 8.12 12.00 o15CHG 14.23 16.03 11.38 6.75 2.52 .97 .56 .33 .00 RONOFF VOLOME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 3.95 WATERSHED INCHES, 6.68 CFS-HRS, .55 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED HY: VHB PAGE 15 . ' OPERATION R[1NOFF CROSS SECTION 3 PEAK TIME�HRS) PEAK DZSCHARGE(CFS� PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 8.27 (RUNOFF) TIME(HAS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. .00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 . .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 1.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .09 .09 .04 .OS .OS � . 2.00 DISCHG .05 .OS .06 .06 .O6 .11 .08 .09 .07 .07 3.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .09 .07 .09 .07 .13 _ .09 . .08 9.00 DISCHG .OB .19 .10 .08 .14 .10 .08 .15 .10 .09 5.00 DISCHG .15 .11 - .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .16 .11 6.00 DISCHG .16 .18 .11 .16 ' .18 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 � .18 .18 .18 .18 .25 .28 .28 .26 .28 8.00 DISCHG .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .36 .31 .29 .36 � 9.00 DISCHG .38 .31 .36 .38 .38 .38 .38 .96 .91 .46 . 10.00 DISCHG .91 .96 .98 .56 .51 .56 .58 .58 .66 .68 '�, 11.00 DISCHG .75 .98 JB .93 1.05 1.07 1.30 1.52 2.96 9.73 �I 12.00 DISCHG 7.45 8.19 6.06 3.97 2.09 1.39 1.21 1.11 .94 .89 I 13.00 DISCHG .81 .92 .77 .69 .67 .61 .52 .57 .52 .49 14.00 DISCHG .99 .99 .99 .92 .40 .49 .92 .40 .32 .37 15.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .32 .3"7 .32 .30 .37 .32 .30 .30 16.00 DISCHG .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .22 .27 � .29 .22 .20 17.00 DISCHG .12 .17 .20 .20 .20 .12 .17 .19 .12 .17 18.00 DISCHG .20 .12 .17 .12 .77 .12 .17 .12 .17 :12 19.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 20.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 21.00 DISCHG ' .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 22.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 23.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 � 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLOME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 6.55 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.51 CFS-HRS, .79 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RCINOFF CROSS SECTION 9 , PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) . 12.28 � 11.04 (RUNOFF) � TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCAEMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 4.00 � DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 5.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 .09 .OS .OS 6.00 DISCHG .OS .06 .07 .07 .07 .OB .OB .08 .09 .09 7.00 DISCHG .09 .10 .11 .12 .12 .13 .15 .18 .20 .21 � 8.00 DISCHG .22 .23 .24 .25 .26 .26 .28 .30 .31 .32 9.00 DISCHG .34 .36 .37 .38 .40 .92 .94 .46 .96 .51 TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 3 • REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 16 � 10.00 DISCHG .53 .54 .56 .59 .69 .67 .71 .�5 .79 .89 . 11.00 DZSCHG .90 .98 1.05 1.12 1.23 1.37 1.53 1.75 2.19 3.24 12.00 DISCHG 5.19 7.99 10.39 11.02 9.80 7.65 5.59 9.11� 3.19 2.59 13.00 DTSCHG . 2.18 1.89 1.68 1.53 1.42 1.33 1.25 1.17 1.10 1.05 19.00 DISCHG 1.01 .97 .95 .93 .89 .85 .89 .82 .79 .74 , 15.00 DISCHG .71 .72 .72 .70 .68 .66 .69 .64 .63 .61 16.00 DISCHG .59 .58 .57 .57 .57 .55 .53 .51 .51 .49 17.00 DISCHG . .94 .38 .35 .35 .36 .36 .33 .32 .33 .32 18.00 DZSCHG .31 .32 .31 .30 .29 .29 .28 .29 .28 .28 � � 19.00 DISCHG .28 .28 .27 .26 .26 .27 .28 .27 .26 .26 � 20.00 DISCHG .26 .29 .23 .24 .25 .23 .23 .29 .25 .23 I 21.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .23 .29 .23 .21 .20 .20 .19 .19 � - 22.00 DISCHG .20 .23 .29 . .23 .21 .20 � .20 .19 .19 .19 23.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 29.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .09 .OS .03 .O1 .O1 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 5.28 WATERSHED INCHES, 15.26 CFS-HRS, 1.26 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPEAATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) � 12.39 12.45 8.90 � TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDAOGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 4.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 - .00 .O1 .O1 9.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 DISCxG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 5.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 6.00 DISCHG .04 .04 .OS .OS .06 .06 .07 .07 .07- .08 6.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 �. 7.00 DISCHG .OB .OB .09 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14 .16 7.00 ELEV 7.02 7.02 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.04 7.09 7.09 8.00 DISCHG� .77 .19 .20 .21 .22 .23 .29 .25 .26 .28 , 8.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.09 7.07 - 7.07 9.08 7.08 9.00 DLSCHG .29 .30 .32 .33 .35 .36 .38 -.39 .41 .43 9.00 ELEV 7.08 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.10 7.10 7.11 7.11 7.12 7.12 10.00 DISCHG .95 .97 .49 .51 .59 .57 .60 .63 .66 .70 . 10.00 ELEV 7.13 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.20 11.00 DISCHG .79 .79 .84 .90 .97 1.05 1.19 1.26 1.43 1.74 11.00 ELEV 7.21 �.23 7.29 7.26 7.28 7.30 7.33 7.36 7.41 7.50 12.00 DISCHG 2.33 3.35 5.19 7.79 12.93 6.63 6.63 6.05 5.27 9.50 12.00 ELEV 7.67 7.96 8.31 . 8.65 8.90 8.57 8.57 , 8.96 8.32 8.18 13.00 DISCHG 3.81 3.30 2.94 2.62 2.35 2.11 1.92 1.75 1.60 1.98 13.00 ELEV 8.06 7.94 7.84 7.75 7.67 7.60 7.55 7.50 7.96 7.92 19.00 DISCHG 1.37 1.28 1.21 1.19 1.09 1.04 .99 .95 .92 .SB 19.00 ELEV 7.39 7.37 9.34 7.33 7.31 7.30 7.28 7.27 7.26 7.25 15.00 DISCHG .89 .81 .79 .77 .75 .73 .71 .69 .68 .67 15.00 ELEV 7.24 7.23 7.23 , 7.22 7.22 7.21 7.20 7.20 7.19 7.19 . TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 17 i 16.00 DISCHG � .65 .64 .62 .61 .fi0 .59 .58 .56 .55 .59 16.00 ELEV 7.19 7.18 7.18 7.17 7.17 7.17 7.17 7.16 7.16 7.15 17.00 DISCHG .52 .50 .96 .94 .42 .90 .39 .37 .36 .35 -17.00 ELEV 7.15 7.14 7.13 7.12 9.12 7.12 7.11 7.11 7.70 7.10 ' 18.00 DISCHG .39 .34 .33 .33 .32 .31 � .31 .30 .30 .29 18.00 ELEV 7.10 7.10 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.08 7.08 19.00 bISCHG .29 .29 .29 .28 .28 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 19.00 ELEV 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 �.OB 7.06 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 . 20.00 DISCHG .26 .26 .25 .25 .25 .25 .29 .29 .29 .24 � 20.00 ELEV 7.08 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 21.00 DISCHG .29 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .22 .22 .21 .21 � � 21.00 ELEV 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 22.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .21 .22 .22 .22 .21 .21 .20 .20 22.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 � 23.00 �ISCHG .20 .20 � .19 ..19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .79 23.00 ELEV 7.06 9.06 � 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 � 24.00 DISCHG .19 .18 . .17 .14 .12 .09 .07 .06 .09 .03 - � ' 29.00 ELEV 9.05 7.05 7.05 7.04 7.03 7.03 7.02 7.02 7.01 7.01 �. 25.00 DISCHG .03 .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 25.00 ELEV �.01 7.01 7.00 7.00 �.00 7.00 RUNOFF VOLUME AHOVE BASEFLOW = 5.22 WATERSHED INCHES, 15.11 CFS-HRS, 1.25 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 5 PEAK TIME�HRS) PEAK DZSCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 24.45 INULL) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. .00 DISCHG .00 � .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 � 1.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .09 .09 .OS .OS 2.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .06 .06 .06 .11 .08 .07 .07 .07 3.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .09 .07 .07 .07 .13 .09 .08 4.00 DISCHG .OB .19 .30 .OB .19 .10 .08 .15 .10 .09 5.00 DISCHG .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .16 .11 6.00 DISCHG .16 .78 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .25 .28 .28 .28 .28 8.00 DISCHG .28 . .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 � .36 .31 .29 .36 9.00 DISCHG .38 .31 .36 .38 .38 .38 .38 .46 .41 .46 10.00 DISCHG .41 .46 .48 .56 .51 .56 .58 .58 .66 .68 11.00 DISCHG .75 .78 .78 .93 1.08 1.18 1.88 2.59 7.16 12.89 12.00 DISCHG 21.67 24.21 17.93 10.72 9.61 2.36 1.78 1.99 .94 .69 13.00 DISCHG .81 .72 .77 .69 .67 .61 .52 .57 .52 .99 19.00 DISCHG .99 .99 .99 .92 .40 .47 .92 .40 .32 .37 15.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .32 .37 .32 .30 .37 .32 -.30 .30 16.00 DISCHG .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .22 .27 .29 .22 .20 17.00 DISCHG .12 .17 .20 . .20 .20 .12 .17 .19 .12 .17 18.00 DISCHG .20 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 . TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PA55 3 ' REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDZTIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 18 ) 19.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 20.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 21.00 DISCHG .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 22.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 23.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 29.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLOME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 11.15 WATERSHED INCHES, 16.19 CFS-HRS, 1.34 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 6 PEAH TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.09 27.59 (NULL) - TIME(HRS) FIAST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 Fi0[JRS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. ' .00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 � 1.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .09 .09 .09 .OS .OS . 2.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .06 .06 .06 .11 .OB .07 .07 .07 3.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .09 .07 .07 .07 .13 .09 .OB 9.00 DISCHG .08 .19 .10 .O8 .14 .10 .08 .15 .11 .09 5.00 DISCHG .16 .12 .17 .12 .17 .13 .18 .14 .19 .15 6.00 DZSCHG .20 .22 .16 .21 .24 .17 .23 .25 .19 .24 7.00 DZSCHG .26 .27 � .27 .28 ..29 .36 .39 .91 .42 .94 8.00 DISCHG .95 .49 .48 .49 .50 .51 .60 .56 .55 .63 9.00 DISCHG .69 .61 .68 .71 .73 .95 .76 .85 .82 .89 � 10.00 DISCHG .86 .93 .97 1.07 - 1.09 1.12 1.18 1.21 1.32 1.38 1L�0 DISCHG - 1.49 1.57 1.62 1.83 2.04 2.22 3.02 3.85 8.59 19.58 12.00 DISCHG 29.00 27.56 22.62 18.51 77.09 8.99 8.90 7.49 6.21 5.39 13.00 DISCHG 9.62 4.02 3.71 3.26 3.02 2.73 2.49 2.32 2.12 1.97 14.00 DISCHG 1.86 1.77 1.70 1.56 1:98 1.50 1.41 1.35 1.24 1.25 15.00 DISCHG 1.29 1.21 1.11 1.19 1.07 1.03 1.08 1.01 .98 .96 . 16.00 DISCHG .95 .93 .92 .90 .89 .81 .85 .86 .77 .79 17.00 DISCHG .65 .67 .66 .63 .61 .53 .56 .57 .49 .53 18.00 DISCHG .59 .96 .51 .45 .49 .43 .48 .42 .47 .92 19.00 DISCHG .97 .41 .39 .45 .90 .45 .39 .37 .44 .39 20.00 DISCHG .36 .36 .43 .37 .35 .35 � .41 .36 .34 .39 21.00 DISCHG .34 .90 _35 .33 .33 .33 .32 .32 .31 .31 22.00 �ISCHG .38 .33 .31 .32 .32 .31 .31 .31 .30 .30 23.00 DISCHG .30 .29 .29 .29 .29 .29 .29 .29 .29 .29 24.00 DISCHG .21 �.16 .17 .19 .12 .09 .07 .06 .04 .03 25.00 DISCHG .03 .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 7.21 WATERSHED INCHES, 31.30 CFS-HRS, 2.59 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 RECORD ID k TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEAHODY SALEM , JOB 1 PASS 9 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CON�ITIONS PREPARED HY: VHB PAGE 19 } � EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION END.TOB � RECORO ID � TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 SUMMP.RY ' REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB � PAGE 20 Y SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESOLTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTNE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(') AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDSCATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QOESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) , SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAZN PRECIPZTATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------- RUNOFF ------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA H COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE � (SQ MI) (HR) (HA) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATB 1 STORM 10 - XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 4.70 23.90 3.90 --- 12.08 12.30 2383.5 XSECTSON 2 DIVERT .O1 9 2 .10 ,0 4.70 23.90 2.78 � -- 11.80* 2.17* 420.5 XSECTION 7 DIVERT .00 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 2.78 -- 12.08 10.13 *"'****** � XSECTION 3 RONOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 4.70 23.90 9.45 --- 12.08 5.70 2531.9 XSECTZON 4 RONOFF .00 7 2 � .30 .0 4.70 23.90 3.28 -- 12.29 7.01 1563 J � STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .00 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 3.28 8.29 12.50 5.07 1132.7 XSECTION 5 ADDHYD .00 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 7.01 -- 12.08 15.82 9033.1 XSECTION 6 ADDHY➢ .O1 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 9.53 -- 12.09 17.73 2634.4 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 25 � .. . XSECTION 1 RONOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 9.58 -- 12.08 19.33 2776.4 �'i � XSECTION 2 DIVERT .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 3.18 --- ll.70 2.17 420.5 II XSECTZON 7 DIVERT .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 3.18 -- 12.08 12.16 "�*****'"* �XSECTION 3 AUNOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 5.15 -- � 12.08 6.56 2913.5 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 3.99 -- 12.29 8.35 1864.2 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 3.94 8.99 12.49 6.17 1378.3 XSECTION 5 A�DHYD .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 8.36 --- 12.08 18.71 8315.9 XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 5.42 -- � 12.09 21.03 3129.6 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 99 XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 9 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 5.96 -- 12.08 18.35 3557.1 XSECTION 2 DIVERT .O1 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 3.95 --- 11.40 2.17 420.5 XSECTION 9 DIVERT .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 3.95 --- 12.08 16.16 '*'***•*•* XSECTION 3 RCiNOFF .00 7 2 � .10 .0 6.80 23.90 6.55 --- 12.08 8.27 3675.5 - XSECTION 4 RUNOFF .00 7 2� .10 .0 6.80 '23.90 5.28 -- 12.28 11.04 2464.2 STROCTORE 2 RESVOR .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 5.22 8.90 12.39 12.45 2778.1 XSECTION 5 ADDHYD .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 11.15 -- 12.08 29.45 10668.4 XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .O1 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 7.21 --- 12.09 27.59 9099.0 +. � TR20 XEQ 3/OS/96 STOP & SHOP PEABO�Y SALEM ' JOB 1 SUMMARY REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 21 f SOMMARY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CFS) AT XSECTIONS AND STRUCTORES FOR ALL STOAMS AND ALTERNATES XSECTION/ DRAINAGE � STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS. . .. . . . . . . ID (SQ n1) 10 25 99 . CTRUCTORE 2 00 �. ALTERNATE 1 5.07 6.11 12.95 i XSECTION 1 O1 ALTERNATE 1 12.30 . 19.33 18.35 � _ XSECTION 2 O1 ALTERNATE 1 2.17 2.17 2.17 XSECTION 3 00 ALTERNATE 1 5.70 6.56 8.27 XSECTION 4 00 � ALTERNATE 1 7.01 8.35 11.09 XSECTION 5 00 ALTERNATE 1 15.82 18.71 29.95 � XSECTION 6 O1 ALTERNATE 1 17.73 21.03 27.59 XSECTION 7 00� ALTERNATE 1 10.13 12.16 16.18 (, ^ ` Commonweatth of Massachusetts i Executive Office of Environmental Affairs ; ; s� " Depc�rtment of � aw•�� : � u.� s � � �� ; Environmental Prote�tion Nov � �yyy � ' ' Metro Boston/Northeast Regional Office �. � William F. Weld ��"r�l �S81tY8�Yue� �'G��. Garemor TrUEy$.C0X0 . Secretary,EOE4 David B.Struhs - . Commissioner ; November 2, 1995 ', Mr. Raymond W. Talkington RE: WETLANDS/SALEM ; Ransom Environmental DEP FILE #64-238 ; Brown' s Wharf WETLANDS/PEABODY � Newburyport, MA 01950 DEP FILE #55-369 Stop & Shop Bostcn & Hcw12y St . ACCEPTANCE OF APPEAL & NOTICE OF SITE VISIT � Dear Mr. Talkington: ;d �,, The Department of Environmental Protection is in receipt of ' your appeal dated October 18, 1995 ' regarding the Salem portion of the project referenced above, and has accepted your appeal . This ^ . Department, under the provisions of General Laws, Chapter 131, � Section 40, has scheduled a field investigation with you and all : concerned parties to determine if the area is significant to the ' ; interests of the Act and to informally discuss the relevant � issues with parties to the appeal . Ms . Rachel Freed from the + 'Wetlands Division will be onsite on Tueaday, November 28, 1995 at : 11:00 a.m. '.y r The Department will also continue its review of the appeal ' filed on DEP File #55-369 (19 Howley Street, Peabody) , which is part of the same Stop & Shop project . Action on that Superseding • ; i O'rder was stayed until an Order of Conditions was issued for the Salem portion of the project . With the appeal on the Salem porcion of tne sice, tne Departmenc wiii now go iorward with its review of the project as a single entity. No activity may commence on anv portion of the pro�ect siibject to the jurisdiction of Chapter 131, Section 40 until the D'epartment issues a Superseding Order of Conditions and all appeal periods have elapsed. . �- �''�"V�0 `Commerce Way • Woburn, Massachusetts 07801 • FAX(617)932-7675 • Telephone(617)932-7600 i� 5 � Page 2 DEP #64-238 DEP #55-369 Should you or any party have any quesCions relative to this case, please contact Rachel Freed at 617-932-7783 . V truly yours, �� ames A. Sprague Wetlands Section Chief cc : Salem Conservation Commission, Town Hall, Salem Hoang Tri Lam, 79 Beaver Street, Salem 01970 Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , c/o Serafini, Serafini & Darling, 63 Federal Street, Salem Advantage Bank, 25 Bartlett Road, Winthrop John C. Jeffers, 164 Boston Street, Salem Margaret Buckley, 1212 Ocean Boulevard, Rye, NH Peabody Conservation Commission, City Hall, 24 Lowell St . , Pe'abody 01960 John R. Keilty, 40 Lowell Street, Peabody Paul Sommer, Sommer Environmental, 65 New Salem St . , Wakefield 01880 William DiMento, 990 Paradise Road, Swampscott 01907 ..\UN ('pll y z�� ,,z CanseY-v-a�v�n Commission ; � ;;� Salrm. Ma�cachusctts U1970 , ��. �y^�.�ssnc�*`' . October 4, 1995 Mayor Neil J. Harrington Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Stop and Shop Dear Mayor Harrington: On September 14, 1995, the Conservation Commission voted to issue an Order of Conditions for the Stop and Shop project on Howley Street. The Order of Conditions included several Special Conditions to further protect the adjacent wetland resource areas. The Commission discussed two issues which were not included as Special Conditions but we feel are important to the project. First, the need for quarterly water quality testing in the North River adjacent to the project for a two year period. Second, an educational program on water quality for Salem students utilizing the North River Canal as a model. The Conservation Commission respectfully requests that you consider utilizing $10,000 , of the Community Set-aside funds provided by Stop and Shop through the Mitigation Package to allow the Conservation Commission to impiement these two programs. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, �i`-u`--��(:�C Fred Harney /� Chairman jm�btllsto8sl�op.njh :. ,r ., s.`_.�1�-: _. STOP fi SHOP NOTICE OF INTENT AS FILED WITH THE SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION ON MAY 26, 1995 p,r '7,'-��Ti :. EXHIBITS ai � �l �:;:,. Exhibit 1. �, ;,. . ' . Stop & Shop submittal through VHB dated July 20, 1995 relative to project impacts on interests protected by the Salem Wetlands Ordinance. Exhibit 2. p;,,_, ` = Stop & Shop submittal through Eastern Land Survey of runoff "�`•` r and stormwater calculations. :au!rr: . aiutr:.r;;i, Exhibit 3. 3�;",., � Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental l.� G�: Technologies, Inc. of applicable 310 CMR Regulations and the •-��, -- project impact of those regulations. . ;':�'!ni:: � S_._ �,_ Exhibit 4. �ns�l�: Gulf of Maine comment letter dated July 19 , 1995. �,�ns r�- n�- Exhibit 5. a:., ��sol .*.r>i .. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Executive Summary of Environmental =^ � Site Evaluation. r� . ,,J� . Exhibit 6. Yyyr1�, Conservation Commission Notice to Abutters dated August 9, ' -"��'�"+ ' 1995 concerning change of public hearing date to August 16, rnel}. _-;,_,- ,.�r� .:. ,�. 1995. --�:-v ==Exhibit 7. Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. , comment letter dated I July 25, 1995. , .::""_::. � ( � Exhibit 8. Stop & Shop response letter dated July 27, 1995 to comment letter of Ransom dated July 25, 1995. Exhibit 9. Stop & Shop submittal through VHB dated August 3, 1995 which includes: Attachment A "First Flush" Documentation; Attachment B Effects of Various Storms; Attachment C Best Management Practices. Exhibit 10. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated August 7 , 1995 of wetland soil logs. Exhibit il. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated August 7, 1995 with attachment concerning US Army Corps of Engineers Programmatic General Permit. Exhibit 12. Stop & Shop response dated August 9, 1995 to the Gulf of Maine comment letter dated July 19, 1995. ' Exhibit 13. Gulf of Maine comment letter dated August 14, 1995. Exhibit 14. Stop & Shop submittal of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 's Environmental Site Evaluation dated July, 1993 as revised, October, 1994 . Exhibit 15. Letter from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and Wildlife dated July 25, 1995. Exhibit 16. Memorandum from Charles Quigley to Conservation Commission dated September 14, 1995. Exhibit 17. Letter from VHB dated September 13 , 1995 regarding the setback issue. Exhibit 18. Letter from Gulf of Maine dated Se tember 14 1995 re ardin P , � 9 9 the setback issue. Exhibit 19. Letter from Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated September 14, 1995 regarding the Buffer. Exhibit 20. Article from the Salem Evening News dated January 24 , 1989. �I r , _ �'�" ' � �� Yanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. EXHIBIT ; � � � lUl Walnut Street . Post Office Box 9151 , Watertown Massachuse[[s 02272 617 924 1770 FAX 617 924 2256 July 20, 1995 Ref: 03834.26 Salem Conservation Commission One Salem Green Salem, MA Re: Stop& Shop Salem - Peabody Dear Commissioners: We have been requested by our client, The Stop& Shop Supermarket Company,to assemble information in regards to Section 34-4 of the Salem Wetland Ordinance. The information illustrates how the proposed development will not harm the seven public interests protected by the Ordinance. Specifics on each of the interests are provided below: • Public or Private Water Supply � -'We have reviewed Hydrologic Data maps prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey for the Peabody/Salem area. These maps indicate that there are three (3) industrial wells within 1/2 mile of the site, all located in Peabody. One of those wells is located on-site. The other two wells are much smaller wells located upgradient and on the opposite side of the North River from ihe site. There are no municipal wells located near the project site. Based on conversation with local officials,the City of Peabody obtains all of its water supply froin surface water sources. The major water sources are Spring Pond, Suntaug Lake, Ipswich River, and Whinona Pond. The North River is not utilized as a water source. The City of Salem is part of the Beverly Salem Water System, which is a joint association between the Cities of Salem and Beverly to provide water to its residents. Water supply for the Beverly and Salem Water Board is provided by wells in Salem, along the Swampscott corporate boundaries, as well as surface water sources located within Beverly. The development of this project will not have any effect on either the Peabody or Salem water supplies. There will also be no impact to the industrial wells as they are located upgradient from the site. • Groundwater Supply According to the USGS mapping referenced above, the site is located over an area of stratified glacial deposits. Although it is not utilized as a major source at this time, it does have some potential to be utilized as a well source. The proposed development will result in the increase of the imperious area on the site by about 15%. \\SPOCK\WINDOWS\03636\LETIERS\SALEMCON.DOC � � �` . � � Project No.: 0383426 July 20, 1995 Page 2 To ensure that the groundwater supply is unaffected by the development,the proponent is proposing to install an infiitration system on the site. The infiltration system has been designed to recharge roof runoff from the proposed building to mitigate the loss of infiNration due to the increase impervious area. The roof runoff, which is essentially clean water, will be recharged into the groundwater by an infiftration system located in front of the proposed supermarket. See the attached calculations entitled "Proposed Infiltration System", for the detailed design and layout of the proposed system. As part of the development of the site, underground storage tanks and vaults, as well as any nearby contaminated soils will be removed in accordance with MA DEP guidelines. The removal of these materials will additionally protect the quality of the ground water in the vicinity of the site. • Flood Control An analysis of the compensatory flood storage for both the existing site conditions and the proposed development plan indicates that there will be an increase in the flood storage capacity on the site after development. There will be tlood storage areas created on site to compensate for the volume lost due to construction of the building and associated parking and loading dock areas. For each elevation, greater storage volume exists in the proposed condition than presently exists on site. This will be achieved by excavating into areas of the site which are presently higher than the FEMA flood plain elevation. There will,therefore, be no adverse effect on Flood Control due to this development. • Storm Damage Prevention • The proposed runoff from the site will enter the North River Canal and will travel downstream weli before the peak flow from the upstream watershed, which fotals approximately 5,000 acres. An analysis has been performed to show the runoff from the site will enter into the North River six hours before the North River peak occurs. See the attached calculations entitled "Impact on the North River"for a detailed analysis of the North River watershed and the effects of the proposed site improvements. There will not be storm damage due to the development of the site. Under the proposed conditions, a new drainage system will be utilized which will connect to the North River at elevation 5.3. When flooding of the North River occurs, water will immediately begin backflowing into the site drainage system. This new system will thereby provide additional flood storage for the North River below elevation 9.5, creating a positive effect on the prevention of storm damage. • Prevention of Pollution "Bordering Lands Subject to Flooding"are not considered to be significant to the prevention of pollution. However, the proponent is proposing several measures to prevent pollution both during and after the completion of construction. \\SPOCK\W INDO WS\03834\LEITERS\SALEMCONDOC y� ' � Project No.: 03834.26 July 20, 1995 Page 3 During construction of the proposed Super Stop& Shop, haybales and silt fences will be employed along the perimeter of the site to control siltation of down-gradient areas caused by runoff and migration of the exposed soils. All areas that are disturbed during construction will be landscaped to prevent erosion. Following construction,the proposed drainage system will utilize catch basins with sumps to capture sand and grit in the parking lot runoff and oil hoods to retain floatables in the runoff. Runoff from the south and east sides of the site will be directed to the drainage system via a grassed swale at the edge of the truck dock area. The proposed grassed swales will aid in the uptake of pollutants from the storm water runoff. In addition, the site will implement oil &grit separators to further remove oils, grease, sand ' and grit from the site's storm water runoff prior to discharge to the North River.. • Protection of Land Containing Shellfish Research with the Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and Wildlife indicates that there are no shellfish beds within this area of the North River. The Department has seen no evidence that the intrusion of salt water due to tides was present in the river above the area of Salem Oil and Grease Company which is significantly downstream. • Protection of Fisheries Research with the Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and Wildlife indicates that there are no areas to support fisheries in this area of the North River. The Department has indicated that due to the contaminated nature of the North River, the Division did not consider the upper North River as a fishery. We trust that this information will assist the Commission in reaching a decision on this project. Please feel free to call us if you have any questions or need turther information. Very truly yours, V SSE H RUSTLIN, INC. Michael E. McNeice, P.E. Senior Project Manager \\SPOCK\W INDOWS\07834\LE7TERS\SALEMCON.DOC IMPACT ON NORTH RIVER The attached calculations present analyses of the exisHng North River watershed and the proposed Stop& Shop drainage area. Based upon these calculaHons, the addiHon of the peak runoff from the Stop &Shop site will have no impact on the North River,due to the large size of the North River watershed,es6mated at approximately 5,000 acres. I � 1 �� _ � �� I / .\ � �� - ' � � \ ��. i�'� ��• ��` �Y�. ' j1��j �� „ �'� �✓—'� � .`.�� r �►�� .� � �``=%3 U VF-" �;" � ,{� '.� ��•� .. .��` ,c �� \�` � �� S �`�� ' � ._�/� �� '•�` �� /'�i . � ��,� a, � �A � i� .`"��s��. , ",�, r -,. � ; r��.�. �- :.� ��tA � _, -��_��.�,� _- ._. . .� �I � ! � _ :9 x °' �� f� �� '��`� �r ,. "��1�' � � / ► J, / � �<��rl�i1l�� ,� � _��. � !� �� L',�� :, • �' /I �.e�� -� � �� _ 7 �,-�'- � &l' � `� , �d; +� •.�� .� • - • V � �� , .�I� �� .•.�r �� J� -�-�-_ � �` �� :� � ��3'��,.•�� - e�` � � •'��._:��'`�.� ��_ ��. � �m � ,� i �� --- .`'�� _ � � s,�g *� �' � _��;t.�:��`� - ��4 � � \ � � I � . � , m � �� ( . � �� ;� � � - s��'r � �. ,.�.� •r/� - ��` + � _ _ _ - - � � ;' , _ ► , _:,�� .,� ► �_ t -- ��;:,�� _ ��.✓�.��°'�'�j/��,�� i � .'� _ ♦ � . ' �.��' ' �.' ��ai � � � �- � � ,1,//�' � � - '�S� �� .�`� _ �. � ' � _ � '.� �d`�� °�� -��,�` � \ � � 7 �. .i � .x:._ .-�'. -\� � � ♦ i� �. �� -, �<.:;,� _ , _�� . y� �. �; ,. - _ - �� €- ��y�_ �` �'+��'�'� ' � � . � , � _ �'' ��'� ' � ` �-_:= i�` ;,l'�� 1�: ' .' �- '.' � . � ► �. r!� � �� .,:. �j// � �/ � ^.`T!°" " ^�' _ _.� � ,� � �� _ _ — — � /!.a, � ��.�Ed'."y��q,. ,., x ��,ey�"� ••. � t , � ,\ i j �� _ i � � f±=E�i� S' �� - ��- � � � �` �"�T�a`3z`��3s_�� T��r � �.�.� �� ' _ � ��OC� r� . •.. a .;: a� � _� � , � i(�1 v�,•. �.: f i�� -_ � - -�. � . � - � r � , � �' ., 4 — — � .:� . - - u „ ,.� �V � a -�f � - ,�, ,:. � F -; .., . � - A _ :x. o . - � - � — - - - e, , Z►: � - — p � , . � -� - - �� — � ,�- , _ - � � ; � ..; ��;r _ � � . -_ �� _.R".':.. /a �.-: ' � _ , 9:-, 1"` - �� •,/ - . , '� - ' ' � � � --�--...� :, � : �'�i t - �; _ � —,yy� ��. �, � � % I�� , �.. �. ' _ 7 • -• -� .�_„_� a11'+-- ''�' � � � �, � �� ,,,, � � �-� ; .. .. + � �"�.� 'S'�� ' � 7�s4'-s.�' �.�.. � >'. .. �',� �`i ♦ � � ' �� '� ' �S ' ,�� - � �� "a �%:C a � S*�� __ - �r�.� � '�.. � �� '� �� `�^-� '4 � _ '"]}s!*a';a��':.:��'a�. - -- �'� , '� /Y.y.C�-'y . ��'<�, � �!. �� ,► ._ . �By� _�_ - =.�" ' al 6a�r v- ��iY!? �y.�z-��:G°5c' ��S�is"w t. � �� ` �� I 1r :. � e£�t � �.� �: � ��.,A' _ �`" ,� ii-�q`�r � � �%�� ' _ � _ �1�_ , � - �� a ` ��da�3-•�,a�,�:�. ��,�- �� ,�::. �.'�"- ;9_.=,n.�, r „ --.�� s./�� • �. , . q\•� �r, ��a,,-�+.. � ,.� ��1T� �.`` xt> �s �,. � t � • � `" �1d� '� /�� '� � � I / ' y♦��i,T/,�//:t '� �o m�r- ��,_,_ \ . i: �.� } . .'I ,�' ,�".:!1c.c � � � �� , ` . ��,�`� . �''� r �� }�. , �_v. �1.-� . :�~ 3 6�� r�s"=�tt,,�� s `�•� . . )r _:� •' � \• 7 �. �y� �� ":-�_.`c � � daa��.,; � ,f�.,m -� ��'a.'.�� , , �1� i �b, , -� �� " r - \ f � � � � yr�� \ ,. ��°�p�'��,1 $�� : , , . . r ; �. �� , , �,, � �� -�! , . . * . ��;- !� �a', �� >:< � t'�"�. � i��c�� .,��-'� , : ►.�+� �,_ / .�- �� _ r . �� e!. �� ' R� � �� . . : �.;�' _ ::,: :.. � -. .: . ' _�'°: .. I��4'. . — -- `.. , �� '� � ' :'•`B �P + �i ��'�■�'�,��1'�`�f�� `�� '��::'r,y1� � � / I• �� ' - � �' �� . I ^' � �, s� �� , � '� ��1� q �� t .�� rI" � 'V'� '�L`�i�� /��',5��*`��f�P.✓I��'n�i��"�AN�^�� , f` ��0� t.' � t�y �� a� � �` � �`��_��-��r�.. ��` as- ,- .a'! s=" I R3`�►� �� -/ � • � �: r�.'.�� ` �� ' .�+ ��'{\� •�;��.�0 �s' `�"�`�` ��C, �.�`�'y�:��` � ��q`/{��f, �+��6 A^'�� r�� ,'� �v .�� : \ o '':�,I� ' _ ��\4'� H �.��\��'k ry+7a�°,;��.��@�`�' ` ► � ��• % _ � � '-'�� Y�r) d*. �'��'��" '�_ ^`,' b � ��', �� / �7 ��I �S . � � ��" . Iv '`�°;"% ��• Os J ;��y` 'r� �`��%,� E: .m�`�; • �P' � �� _i _ ;� �� 7 X � �� . ;� ��.�d . ...,�s. `ry� �S'.��"! _ ��"' „" - . . �.�� i P��:��4 - �. -. �\ � �� ,�� ..: .�� Y- . .... � � � � � � � 2� ` �, w ,,� �� It� �� `� ��' `;° . ��`��ys�'�� '�/ �6666..��j „'�� -�\'�►_ ' �� ;- '_ .�,��`,c�,,�`,�y,�. �� .�` � �-� -?. e"�� r �� i�" �,✓��}' `I��.• �� a�=� .�� .�� jj�� \�� - � � l!: �0..in.�1 • r�"��.:'r"` �� \ ,`��•�i��" r` �' � �`�� `�,_' �� 'AI •�i��lll._�.�,..�_ .��'1.Yi:'��,��-� - � * ;� Se` � �� .f� �� 0�¢' �.��w'�``��=�- � ar��f��7��►.�ia��:�� y �II y 1r �..� ,g�� A `�`� � - ' : — � � � � ;�,,t .., _ �- � ;�� , t:�;��g �� -�� -a��. . , � —�v �. � 5 _..- � � �r 1� �( � r.��.� �' �` �� . s. � � � � • _ � � 1 p� ' @r �gr, l%1 � � G 'w �� 7 � ��/. � �Miw - i ��1. ` e . ��.� r . �_T' �.�',,l�i�` ��Q�.. � -� 1��^./�� f!' .� �\ � ..�141P` ' ' �.�� ..'r`� _ �I �� ,. ��i�.�' g� t q� ` �f � 1 � f R• iY �,, �� S. _�� 3� � rc" f : r d � '�'t� '� �.: �r� '�f� .. � ��t �. � 1, dri� ,� � :_-� i �dr� r-t� � 1 F'� �-.�?�K �N �+'��j J��M,y� , `�9 �� _ � ��.. _ � � � ",.�i f l�w�l rr. (E `�--e Q �\ � �^�1 .� /� �� '. :��E' \ � � � . . � .e. ` =." _��,/4(g �'l�i.r ��s.'�'e r=~�8"� 1,� . ,,,,,,,,t�yE.� .R., � �'>. `�, - �� : • � � � � p s g�e � �� r�� d4.: �`` . , i,� --�tit Qhf� /�r" � ;. �1 �.r _ O^fa r �r y��' .-.nC�t' Z2� .� � � a . � d'. � t _' � � , �[ _ � @ �.' y4f � :�!�'Gxl . ��W-�� C TK" �. �a I 4. ' . �� .�� -._�_ �.�� d k � �F+ ��}�,� �Q�A, g� �p� �� ,�? �l - -�j F,j�+' iG:.S�aL'�'_�rS�'� �"� '� �yy��+: '�ti@''� : �/� 3 s� .:. r � i o . .� � r� `�� e ��i�I� � �ir�•'� ,�;�� ; i�+" �f �}.T�Y�aIL I�� :f �J�� '� ' �� f0 �r►I' �� :;�"' ��'��$;-:� � � ��,3f ��-'�'�! 'f . r s�.'`� � �'. � p �� .a` � �� i {� g� :d.r,�- �.w{' �2 q � � � \V ` i�^f fn4 �_.E�`. 4' �' "��- �� ..�" / .fr�_.�K'�� - �_ _ � ` �� . �`. - \ I� •,�� ' •� �� / \ c � SQ�:�� . f. ' + . ^'�l':, �`� '� ��_, r� �TQ / ,+ � — �� • '.�y �jl+�� _,.�. c� °� i n.. . . a,�' �. ., . � .� _�-- �r �. !�-. �Ar� � �;- � �.� ` �. y , . � �► _ � � � . ' fs ;,/ ( �.�..� hY-0: �. j �F.: , ��.� /-. ��, - .'r �� , . -�� - _ ,r IiY� • sr. , B '` � _ � _ � � I 1111 Project H(JF Project# ^=-03" Location y��`%=r+� �'�%�/'i' Sheet�of G Caiculated by '/`r �� Date �� C+� Checked by Daze Tide (�.l��`� 1�:�I e(�<.. `nl�'T-E S"t—�, h✓OKT�I 2(V �(Z. v+ni .+� ��a� .r-r�T(�,�C� ; ��='��s- P/�� S� aj�J r� �� 'ti\(�.'�-�<�.-! '.1.,..'r�, r";-f� '• � �L,US 7 4tx� �� N Ho2rH ��E r� � I. _;�, �� ,^;"�.!P�f•J� �'l,C�`�/ ; t �T�F1R��Nq is��•�/�-s'c_t�J = =� �i 1 U\1J rL 1=�J Pc TI/�tJ � � r I r1�E�/R�10�1 �RO� �— /DO FTr - 1"��.�tC1�� '..�' L��1� ^ I� r""' ��"]".vf" �� f 1 � G I � ` `.��J�T�t�cn VE�.Oc.�.,{ � �,�,, �- /S�=C. Sf� �-r,_.:�;�� (�L�.`�r� � M1=� = ��'T� I��3 � i ��?o� `�=�� = 5;3 �to�� Z- 1 c_ C�F ST�2 _F�-,^n �t_.o vJ ; - Qlio�rrc) = b� cFs �SE� A-rr;��t� r�� FEr�P.-� - U�t(J,-H o� 'N,cCLT;t (�N E2 - 3� Fr - ��ur�1 c DFPi7; = 3 Fi � �O-'f2 tA�=. r�oT cN=�=F� -'� �1RC�A�"�x3� % �POFTZ V8GeS5¢Heugeu BNstllq jpC. � Prinred on Itecyded Paper i � Project SfC��S�+tJF Projec[# n'z�?Q Locadon p=T?<.O!SM-'��` Sheet Z of� Calculatedby �M�T Date �7 �� ? ! a ,� Checked by Date Tide �,JC�`2;i-+- �Li�l��% !hlf".'�f,�iu.� Q= �A > Y= Q/a� \I_ G?�c.�s _ y 90 r-r Z 7, � r-/s�L Trca.r�� -r,�nnF — 7�_� ,� I �-i2 �. � FT�S� 31�s=_ c = O .� 1-tl-� ��s.5s�,.rnE srn�� Fc2 {00�`�f`\ �N c F �RrF «lcc��:�.:.�. w�F�u,JJ ' OT��- j i rn E U F Cc+� �cM"�nory = S,'b t+(ZS N�/�irt ✓{ivE2 (�Fr?r< F�UN n1� �� 2rFr,i sr-r� S6 nt� �} r-n;2 sT�r � sr� T��r� FE�nr� SiJ�� IO 'Y�a �wt,J -_ �,q-�D cFS /CO-Y2 F�,ovJ � I` V�-O cFs Vanasse Hsage¢Bnisttia lne. � rrNiee o�ae�yara raper rnD Project �'�P� St'�P P�oject 2# ��=� `� Location y�*'�Cy �SAU�r' Sheetl—of� Calculated by �M� Date 7��R (GS Checked by Date Title_ ON-StTC liCtir^��I�; Pi�=. �2.oPpsEO 517� ON - S�T� I�ME c� C�►�'=��A�Cr� I. 1�6A IN F(L� O�' Z�t�I,�NCt • i,rnE To ci3" 2 = � �N� s�E c�u� �:`r CR::��r.� u�*�ro svRv� �� Ti��n; c?2 ro pm�3 v = a.�� P�, L = So `, —� ►R�rF�'�"��nE � lOsec. = da�� r�,N • T1W1� �J'('�11i'� TD C'M�i Z �/ - Z.5'�1 FP� � � i�D �T > T��r-� j��rn� - 65.�:� _ , rn�� Tiv�c �V`n�t z To Ort��t � i Y - 3.a7 r-P.s L. = 3�0 �=T > T��=� Tivvi� = 78.i srG = ';�srn�N f'oT+�� T�v�n� oF ('oNc�NT2RT�u� = IZ ,6 r�niN Z. I�RFA T� (LEA20F I��1.171NU GRRSS �V,J�P��C � l�_ �`�U r i 5w�� = O�b°/a `y �� = � �ZrPS �Y�� /�L "�VUt� '= �ZlMi1J r ` ��M',rJ l�1Pr� " �? Z W1�N Vanasse Hangen Bmstlln,Ine. � Prinled on Recycled Paper r� Project wTOP9 5F'rUG Project# �'�== . _, � Location V!'r�LY SPi��'M Sheet of Q Calculated by �� , 1a ' Date % ��°��Q�� Checked by Date TiUe � �1-S��'- 1.iG��r ;F;�:� F.(C�A IN FCZOt�1 � 0�= �3Ji�fl�tJG, Cor�T2A�S '. -T� = IZ.6 �rn� N �fz.ow� SiT� r�`�o fzo�-oG`l C P,t,cS; �Y c�5::i2N �%,f�� s�cz.vey' P�,�c - i b �2 Fc�� T�V NOF�= - z2 c fs 100Y�2 P��K r��No�F : 3<'c�� ( s -r_E �TrRC!�� D � I'H'E r4TTi?ttiEQ /�yr{�RD�(LF�S � I b=f�C f�r`� ;DO -Y� � S1�GN T��rr Tlfic- N�-�r �<V N OFF �=�Lw� �rH-+-'_ f-+('<Q�US� �O Sl i r" �N1�-� �A�l� No 1 rnttci GUJ T�ftr NO2 ,rF-t �wcr�. � THE P�Px /��J'1aP= r�r� j rtr-" N�2-;'�-i ��2. W�'� ;,:.r��rt �p �S Y�l� L`,'r=a rJ'_ f��tQ �'c.v�.S AFT.i(t- `htE P�Pi� �uP�,oF= rr��'1 'f`}r,c� ��T� ENTE2S Ttt� QZ�v�, VanasseHangenBmstlin.Ine. � PrincedonRecycledPaper r � � ) Project S Projec[# 3��'� Lceadon � � S'A'L�'i��Sheet of Calculated by �M�� Date 1 r q � Checked by Date Tide 1,(�=f�C S . ...�"-,/�`. �' C i � - +'�n � � � � \ � -` � � a � O, � � � 4 - O C �j � � � � � S C � n Q � Q � i � � � � � � � � , � _ � ,� � Q � L � '� _ � UJ �' � �- �n � �� c p �� V 4 M N � ° ° � � 8 S � � M lV _ S��) Ma�:1 Vanasse Hangen Brustlln,Inc. � Prin�ed on Recyded Paper r 11J_) Project STnP � Sl�c?� Project# l"%�4� �- ,, Location��Q��w /y�� Sheet ^ of q Calculatedby 'fn3T Date -1 �IG��IS Checked by Date ' Tide I (�(1-`It'� S'TZ'�-�`�1 } s e � .� >> � ` �J' J , 1 � � � � 1� Q z � � � � Q � � �U c -� v � Q � � � ` O C .: o � '� ^ � Z O �y �' �' .. .D 1 �a � � _ W � L � � �" I �1 V �7 I v q i C � I �'� � � � ` •,',, �" � � �� i `�l I � � �__� 1 1 � � $ � o �� G�' � $ � � Q � � � (S=`') M°"� Vanaae Hangea Bcustllq Inc. � Prinled on Recycled Paper � �o- q IPROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed Site Development Plan consists of the construction of a Stop and Shop Supexmarket together with parking and loading areas, landscaped areas and improvement of the wooded slopes by addition of appropriate landscape species, slope cleaning and stabilization. The Jeffers portion of the site is to be re- worked to incorporate the existing Mill Building into the present Lumber Storage Building and provide for improved parking and circulation. The ezcisting residential builclings are to be pre- served. Site coverages in the proposed condition are suirnnarized as fol- lows: STOP & SHOP JEFFERS Area (Ac) % of Total Area (Ac) % of Total Bui.ldings 1.44 18.9 .24 3.2 Paved Areas 3.74 49.3 .28 3,7 Landscaped .90 11.6 ,22 2,g Natural Areas .79 10.4 SITE HYDROLOGY Estimated peak rates and volumes of nmoff for ten and one hun- dred year storm events have been calculated utilizing a computer solution for �thodology presented in the United States Depart- ment of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Technical Release 55, "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds". Calculations of runoff curve numbers and hydrograph si�mil.ation (from the tabular unit hydrograph method) follow. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows: STORM PRECONSTRUCTION POSTCONSTRUCTION BETURN PEAK RUNOFF RUNOFF VOLUME PEAK RUNOFF RUNOFF PERIOD (CFS) (AC-FT) (CFS) VOLUME (AC-FT) 10 YEAR 19 2.21 22 2.35 100 YEAR 30 3.57 � 35 3.72 I � g o�- a � � � - - _.� __, � :a i_=— ---- - T � =-;=— za �' —-- � - y j=_ . ___ �. � 1 i ' . O � . i—..._. .—_' , 4 I_" ""__ , �O C WQ. � �0 I e�e---^P =y • J � P�GJ ..�d�-�.: i""__ ^ W � J= .C. � � " -_. 2v�P��W.��1. � _ � 2�� a�� "�=` V f-��r�h p > 2 r=-_" i� �a � ` � � � ? _ `T�r��2P�� ``�.� _ _ _._ �_ z�^ --��;:_,_` � " �- '---_--� � `�'x�'�x u ^ �.+ 4 v c - -- -. --. -�--r -- '�� ;_— . �C ae _ -r ' � .f... .-��.f' � .j — _— T - _- � a ' �.� . 3 =.—:'_'-_'."__ '� —_— ._'�'-- _� - . .2 ` — _ -- - - _ _ ""_- L � ".—_ ' ' —__'. i , . ._.._.— . .. . . �. _. � . ._..._ _... ._._.. '_____—� . � _' _i'_ ""'... . . .. ... „ t _L.. .i -. . . _' '"_'�___'_ � .. I I 2 3 i 10 �Q 7 2 7 VELOCITY Ift/secl � Reference: TR ;55, Urban Nvdreloav ior Smail '�VatersneCs. SCS. . � � Average Velocities for Overland Fiow � , . . ; , , . . ,.,-••t:..,��.,:;,:,,.:. �•:,�,�;d� ti ,;. . ,;, • Y, • ' :ai:'�.. . . ' ' . , . . . . .,�r t/Pi.;.�Y )e,- . f :: " � i" . �� '�"t �+ . t�.t � ,4': . .S.tiJ� ' � . � � l�ii�� . , . . . . :� . � . .. ��.ti�.4� . :;.• , , n , �:;a �a 7ABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF DISCH71RGE5 . . " , � � �. :j;�, i � . .. . . . . ., �,.,+- DRAIN.4CE AREA PF1+K�pIBQIARC,FS (Cfs)� � � ,:�� .. ! !, ' �N�_ S�n'F_t. ANL LOCATION (6q. InSlee) 10-YEAR . $O-YEAR . 100-YEAR ��SOb-YEAR' ��y. ._. . _'— - i : .i:, • •#. .� ..�.'ll I.7VL'tr .. - ' � J��„ piYl.i. :� i �.ebud;-[�auvcrs- . � .. . �jli'� ..,� "i I1lrcuu �'orpura[e ��. � ' �'� . . i:rv�u; 44.6 630 . � 93 . , 1.130 . 1 E20 '� i�R� , � '• • . . . '. ?�<r[.� � . . _ . . . . ��Tl� . : � I.1�1 f� : � :-.:,!r•m �:�>��+u��te limits 9.96 6G0 � 990� � . 1,140� - 1�620 � �i,� .::t�oaa�� ot. Stron9water . . ':� <,.r;,.,:: - 8.86 58G 88G� �` ' 1.0J0 1.4,70�� _p� ��% - , . :� - - . ._ :�.,�.: �.�:3: �i '! b�:u�n: . t< y .� y �7i�3��t•�`' � :t :.:am of Gold[h�.'aite � � - - ' I:��;�.:. � 3.52 240 . 34Q .:�'�! p 920 ,, •t�410��'- e �ean�� at Sta�e koote 128 2.52 ' 170 : � �26p 2:' �-�310`— � 45C,,�,a�. i �: . ��:.i ��,.�m of Dow•ning Road 2.10 150 - 240 ' ` 200� ° A20" . . n ��ect �.�pstream of . t '.!'.• � ; ��. , wr.inq koad 1.C9 140 220 .. . , -' 260 � 380.� i;:. ,..t:��,nc of I.Ibtrc Hoed 1.22 130 . 200. . . -230 3�0�:`.+ � �j�' _ r , . '� 4-',I'LF I:HU')K. � . . .. ' : � F . ,,.i,rc w',cr� rroct.or � . , a . ,. ��I' .,. � 1.08 77 '_20 14G 210',- � �w'�?�'' �J,ri, � . r� . . . . . ...�+ . . - ''�.r�^,.'.:: , ' �:'r.UOC .. . : :ii:w� � . . . .. i C MiCtl ['YOCtoi . . . � ��t.i:�! � . .•. .• . 4.93 350 530 ' 630 910 . - ':iy;� ; . . . .: c,f :.�:lene [.ane J.SI� -330 490 ' S80 040� , . -- . . . . , Y 9 Ji: . . .irt. oI koston ar.d ' FQ .. . , ' i ,,: 1:�<.�..d crossinq 3.90 260 410 400 � 71Q �.�t' ^: . .�. . t� i�aa � . � .i � du�+:�btream of � i Vli�� . ,::�u,.�: .�: �u�,; 2.56 190 300 . . . 350 � . 520 t�'?`',( Q S , : . u(:_trcani of ' . . ,. :� �T4fs5" � . s.i� iso z3o z�o � aoo , �; -0 ,�:.: - �.«et . aa . . . .�I yraniGe� .zlab . . . . ' � ' � �i� � '7 milr_s ebo:e - � .. .. �� . .��. �;�� . . . . . . � .. � oqn � .. OUTLET CULVERT r� 11 ) Project-5 ibP � 6t/jOG Project# �=��-�'1 Lceation��IsP�/'� Shee[�of� Calcula[edby �t-''� Date -'r��a`; Checked by Date TiUe QJUL�R'r .� �A,�R':�.0 �6-v�`NG � ' - �i .S\z� CU�-V�2T ��O � ��!!L� A �`A}N1iM�.hM 19J" C:7Y �T`.. � �,F-' �.�r--,-�.) IOP � ��r-�r�-2" R�'�1'D `GR�VROAvJ, �'(;6�n ;r��NG c^.r.tG�'5�;,(�a� P�t�N'. ----___ _._. _-- i'fz�rcK F� � 9,3 �� 26�M C��-ir, .^cr�S� � — I�vAS�A�,� �t�'"� - ��.�< �U�..�irr'�" Cu��r;rtr L�FTy = �,'3-I.S-1,0 -S2S- �,-;��:_r�.lt�� ,. ; `-- �Ny= Sz� = I,SSFr - � N�rk 1ZNrc,�, p Ss�.,.,.e a- oFF�n oF ► '- c�" ( s-r-r,�o�o siz�. j ,�o r�, �. ._.� r=�. �,�-r� t'c��2 �r�1on` ;,,.,,c.�c�=.r � I.,PLS 'Fc�� C..�,LfZvca� toPctiNC� C��rO"�a,�S. ��NO 2��b�tf��o Wi��-F 0� CU��2;' - Fr Qu�r2r_,C CftPFc ,7Y = 22 GFS �lo -Yr= sTar�� ' WAN i Cvc.vG�.r 'Ta P�KS ��O.,.y wy E�1 ��rna.T �U�� C.D�,PT� = O -aSFr �. ' ,�j'_oi'� = Z�. ��8 - '� �/F7L'J� % �. �I� �Cr p'�C(�ET� � VanasseHangenBrustlla,lnc. � PrinredonRerycledPapet rj1 � ) Project .SR`G '1 S r:�' Project# ��3�. Locadon+'E/i&Y.'f�, 11=+'H Shee[�of�— Calcutated by 'M13T Date 7��a�GJ Checked by Da[e TiQe `.'_%L'��';-� T)c�1(�,t� Q = ,. 4 �- ��,3 jsj'2 � - ��Y ��on1 = 4Fr � - 3.aFrZ Q: i, �a � �� ,�� (3,a�� 6 4 ; ( o.�o�g ; � w� � SaFr �_ �'/W P ' 0.64 C� = `3.� C F S t— 'T� L-o vJ — Tr��s w�a-rr� = 6 Fr !4' = .S7 FfZ Q' 1�4q �5�7 � ��7Z,�3 �d,001�,,�Z' WP = �, 9 �-r 0 oi3 � _ A� � _ (Z - /WP = 0.7Z (jZ _ ZZ,� �FS �' �fcEA�fC 'T�+�`J f«Q'D USC fh � �T x 6 Fr I ll�lSlOr D/WI � BOX GUI.�/r « uN �r2 T�Kc ��f�Ao Tr��c�S , - �Jr�.00�T''f ou i d� Cul.�lC(z� Q= v►� ; v = Q/� v = Z� = 3 .-7 �P s Vanasse Heugen Bcustlin,Inc. � Prmted on Recycletl Paper rnt) ProjectSiRP S1-Ff� Project# �3��5 Lceation'��x'< �SAL-f� Sheet�_of 3 ' Calculated by 'M¢" Date �' ��G 14 � Checked by Date Tide— C'J'�.v' :`G-� �.�::�'.!�f 1 .- .s F�_oFos��: TL �NS�� Tt+� C ��.)t,v-r��.— -,�� OP-rJ CUTT\ NC-�. i l��O�X-e=. ;L: c c�f".!_(�=:�FL �:�L ��./ �2 � S1h'41_F DA`F � NIGN� ( �,.'-,�'"':N""'f l 'r��C1 (�V NS � 6 (Z OV F 2 F ��U FF��f�sp 1 ;- -�Lj c -�-2r.,��V� �:(�� NO; �CU,��N�NG. �rl� C�.�S��(= �J^�;f1 LFir�.!�� : f��i (`a1cT�^G�iS 'N Il.l. �.�QJ\�.� `y �,�=i E �F�CN1r'l. O� T1-;E fZFt�RUF�O P(L��v�� Ta C.ONssf�..J��-��J . 1V1i1FRCT5 oN 1�-tF_ No(LTFt fZ��LF-2 �3Pct�11C W�LI� SbC �M�N �vv�W� P'r5 TY>-U CV'r W�t� ON1,� H�4�tE Ta t3E lo r-p lZ. F�,�- W�pc !�l CR-�DEr` "Ta ��TAti.� T� �3L•t�2't Vanaae Hangen BrusUlu,Inc. � Printed on Reryded Paper ' PROPOSED INFILTRATION SYSTEM Stop&Shop is proposing to construct an infiltration system to ensure that the volume of runoff after construcfion will not be increased over present conditions. According to the drainage calculations completed by Eastern Land Survey Associates,the predevelopment runoff volume is 2.21 ac-ft and the proposed postdevelopment runoff volume will be 2.35 ac-ft. Thus, by infiltradng a minimum of 0.14 ac-ft the volume of runoff leaving the site will not be increased by construcdon. The attached calculaUons detail the design of the proposed infiltration system. r—�. z � \ t,� � ; � O r � � ' I � � p �e �T� � n � � � � � � � � 3 o � m z � Z � 9 Z � � � � � � Z ', � . ��, ' _ � - I � � , — o � , �, Z „ , �, , ,. �° -� - - � ' , ,: � � I r : .. � . r '. _ . � . . i� //// /: ! f � !! %/ .�/t// / / /! / . . � . - . � . , � . � . / � . . /!/. ;'�.. , .j � . � . � ' . � Z � / . . - . . . �'� . . � . . . � - - � . �� .. . � �, . . . � � . � � . � � � . _ _ � :i . � � �o ; g � a � � � � � � G � � �jZ ' , , P Z C�, 1t i � � 1 � � _tA_ V� � � 2 � N c " v Z �n ■ , Project Project#_ �3a3a Location �FRFG Sfc�E Sheet�of� I Calwlated by - �b� Date 7 �Zo�G S� Checked by S�L- Date � Title II�t=1l-TfLHTLOtJ S�fST_�— '�.JOW�ME �F W�T�(L 'f� I'Si: lN F�I�T�4'R%O. ( F�Ov,n E,PrSTERN �2��,�{ c.��cu�.r,-T�a��:) P2F_��/�c.-�P�G- riT RV�r�1d�-F = Z.21 �4�-• r- T �UbT(JE�/G-�OPvV�FNT (ZUNO �F = 2.3SR� TT INFIL�RFt'f"E. '�t�Yf= �� FFFIZ-�.NC �� = 0� 1�} AC• FT = 1,6rd Ac� � N to -�C2 sTuz.rn �a�s �2rc, v o� g.60 ��1. �a RO�F Pstz�n� To g� � N��-�TED � 1 . 68 �c.�N 4•Go IN , V 9�1J� ��• '�pSJ�� ROOF P5R6A = �, �q ,AC � (�IFF_0 'T� I N �yl-'ru�f�T� Z S % 6� FZoOF, - G�oar�c�w�i F2. ��T�a�r.� �s � -7, � Fr - S E i U�TVM O� TK EN Ctt�-S � ��O F� I F7` Fl-�,o.Js-� �(� �oU�W� Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. � Prinled on Reryded Paper � Project_SiDP � b f�O P Project# �38 3t} Locadon pER SALr=M Sheet Z of�.— Calculated by�T Date��Z��Q.� Checked by �'iQL Date '7�20/�� Tide �FIl�T2ATi[J�1 �fST�JvI — 6�(t1�o� � N R�'�R �� I NFI�T'2/YTIGN es r+- m�N aF /1 rr S t C 7l0 t�l 6 r= T�E N C H� � R S��1,M F '� 4T W�,pTt+)., 70P dF��1C►+ �d.0 � iNvfa.r aF��,: , ��s „ `� � p��D�� q`� l2 Pr-RF �PiP� � � � � �rrarn v� srz.FNc�F � a� ll�ll�ll �ll ll�C 4 �-4 " "� 01`-I`'�L�nn�Nr -Ty}� tZ,��i��2F_�p t. i= NkTH O� '1'2ENc�� ST��= � 6TUcaPcC,�� ` D�sc.i-t�tt.Gaf G�RV� Wi�� 3�— OE��,�r� �>-p �P� 2- r-o�� o� Ta-�Ncr+� A�� RoN T�2�G 1t ►4- P4N�- 2 �S►vd��S_ �j� r F r2FN'� �-FNG�+S bJII,L Q� t'NPUT UNTI� TIi'� W1�4-X W �E(Z l.E�.l�l_ S�� N ls �cPP2oh��n �T��.Y 2 Fr � ,p��PrH d � �ENC1�, SUMIt�C� �1 PE(LC Z14T� �i— SY��ry IINCH� co�� n�cz-r�. S�rvflS ,rt�.r� Gt�,Av�c.� -�-r_- ✓�/l�x fjLl0�n1 P�3�-F IN� I�-TRfsT�ON �t�ATF lS �,2 � �A� JsF �m�+�. � b.Cmo 4� G�S V8R8SSE H80gED BNSII�,t11C. � Prinled on Recycled Paper I r� Project P Project# �38 Z 4 Location Sheet�of� Calwlated by ✓hn8�T` Date 7�Z o�Q� Checked by ,L�� Date ��A�9T f Tide INF1L'�f2p,TlC�1 S�LSTE�NI " STfl�t, — ST�2AC�E — D1�c�tARLIE CUR�lt—= „ I i-'�2 LI��fHI. Fi. OFT'�ENCF}� 5��1G� STOR�i4E��FL p1�.�fi+�eGE �CF�� D o o.c�sat9 D,S o•8 6•as I 4 I 1, 0 I� 6 p,� ��g �� S Z,4 0.00235' Z,a ��Z- O,I�OZ�'Z - Wl-F'FN Ct��cv�.PsT�NC� y'fU��n�� l- 40°Io VOff� VOI.v�ME 1 N T11 �= STONF �c/AS AS6w�nC0 . $ AJY��E C�-L• Sf``ty E � I�S F T Vo�uv�nE _ (�. S n q.0� � 4D � Z,4 GF " WH"�N C�AI.Cu�A'C�IJCt T�E- .DISCt�(Z4� �1NF��T�rttrrcc�nl� -}—�� l3rn-�oM �2E� �S oN�Y �lsSvMGD T�a �3E SC>`�'o EFF�G7� �E�. 86�'rUrA �2FA S�A'MP�� C/ilC � L✓TFt�I� = I�S F� �SI DF_ y.lftu./1((�� 5asc��E _ �O,Sf hFf) r 2�1��?� O,�oo47cc� = 0 0�2�,5 cFS Vanasse fia¢gen Brustlin,Inc. � Printed on Recycled Paper r 11D Pro�ecc�TUP� s�'}�P Project# UiE�— Location Q�RI'AP( .SAtF,M Sheet of� Calc�lated by �1� Date Checkedby � Date � ��9r Tide 1 N�i t�T(LPr i 1 Cx�y �YST�'� P>f�s�0 �Pd� Ti�-�SE NJ�MQE'2L. R`� T21�flZ � 1�(�2t)CL VS�P}(� `PONO-Z� 1'i� InJRS Ot--i-�2�rn�N c� T'+tar j}AP�OXw�n�L4 3So FEF� o� -c�.�cvc.�r v�ouv� +��=� R� Q��2F�p TD lNFlt-TRl�TF ZS�'o O �- TH`� fLUUF. `SEt. A-TfActsv�D) 1�C C �I�SvS� Ut= Ttt'r b t-tC,R,T 1.4�N4Ttt � '('T2 ENGs} R� Q��z�D� �T W�s �fe �pr-�D Tc� I �.�r«r� A-r� SO% dr TI-tE Itoo�'� 2tQ��2rISt� 70arcc- o� T�F t�I.C.}}. Du � T� ,,SpFiC,C LtYV�ITPs'R6NS, V51� 6 - 120 'Fi TR-EN�t1�. TUY�L 1��4Tti pF SY�-t�NCtt = 7Z0 Fr > -700 �(R�� VeLLBSS¢$9�g¢G$}U8f11O.I¢C. � Printed on Reryded Paper POND-2 Vereioas 4.17 8/Hs 1903000002 Paqe 1 B�COTSD: 07-20-1995 1Ox36t01 •��:��y��e�xY��e:�• 7_Z O� �� e • * infiltratioa aystem � * 350 feeC of treach • • • PE(�3a0� �Si4LEJ`n bT7R � S}FOp : : . . ' �f�we��e�i�eue��::��ee• Saflov Hydroyraphx v:\03836\NOLL .HYD RatiaQ Table files M:\03834\INI+ILT .PND a ""INITIN. C06DITIONB"" Elevatioa . 0.00 ft Wtflaa m 0.33 cfe SCoraqe m 0.00 ac-ft INTSRI�DIATB AODTIN6 GIV�i POND DATA COl1POTATIONB """"""_'__'_"""""" """"'__"'_"'_"""' �BLEVATIONI OOTFL09P I BTOMCS I � 78/t � 38/t ♦ 0 � � (ft) � (cfe) � (ac-ft) � � (cfe) � (cfa) � I""'_"''""""'I"""""I I"""""""I"""""""� � o.00 � o.s � o.aoo� � o.o � 0.3 � � o.so � o.s � o.ao�� i.� � a.a � � i.oa � o.� � o.ai3� � 3.i � s.e � � i.so � a.e � o.ozo� � a.e � s.� � � a.00 � i.o � o.os�� e.s � �.s � ------------------------------ -------------------------- Time iacremeaC ([) = 0.100 hrs. POND-2 Versioa� 5.37 9/ar 1903000002 pnpa 2 EXSCOTSDe 07-]0-1995 10x36x01 PoaB Filex wt\03834\INFILT .PND Iafloa HydroqraDh: m�\03834\NOLL .HYD Outflov �droqrayh: r:\03834\�'i' .� INPLON HYDROGAAPB AO9TI60 COI�DTATIOHS '_'__"_"'_"'__' '_"'_"_"""'_"""'_""""""""""""""' � TII4� I INFIAW I � I1�IY � 28/t - O � 2S/Y + O I OOTFIAW �ELEVATI09� � (hrs) � (cfa) � � (cfe) � (cfe) � (cfa) � (cfe) � (fU � �""""�""""'I I""""'�""__'_""�"""""'�""""'�"""__'� � 11.000 � 0.00� � ----- � -0.3 � 0.3� 0.33 � 0.00 � � ii.ioo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.a � -o.s� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.soo � o.00� � o.o � -0.3 � -o.s� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -0.3 � -o.s� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.aoo � o.ao� � o.o � -0.3 � -o.s� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.soo � o.ao� � o.o � -o.a � -o.a� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -0.3 � -a.a� o.00 � a.00 � � ii.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.a � -0.3� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.a � -o.a� o.00 � o.00 � � ii.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.s � -0.3� o.00 � o.00 � � is.000 � i.00� � i.o � -o.i � a.�� 0.36 � o.os � � ia.ioa � i.00� � s.o � i.o � i.v� o.a� � o.aa � � ia.soo � z.00� � s.o � s.e � a.o� o.se � i.os � � is.3oo � i.00� � s.o � a.o � s.s� o.ea � i.so � � i=.aoo � i.00� � s.o � a.a � s.o� o.es � i.ss � � ia.soo � i.00� � s.o � a.s � 6.3� o.ee � i.s� � � 12.600 � 0.00� � 1.0 � 3.9 � 5.5� 0.81 � 1.46 � . � is.�oo � o.00� � o.o � a.s � s.s� o.s� � i.os � � ia.eoo � o.00� � o.o � i.s � a.e� a.sa � o.ez � � i�.soo � o.00� � o.o � o.e � i.s� o.a3 � o.aa � � 13.000 � 0.00� � 0.0 � -0.1 � 0.6� 0.36 � 0.08 � � i3.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -a.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i3.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -a.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 13.300 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -a.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i3.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i3.sao � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 13.600 � o.00� � o.o � -0.3 � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ia.�ao � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.oa � � is.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 13.900 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o,00 � o.ao � � ia.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.ao � � ia.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ia.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ia.soo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ia.aoo � o.00� � a.o � -o.i � -a.i� o.00 � o.00 � ( ia.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ia.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � ia.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -a.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ia.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � ia.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � a.00 � � is.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.xoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.soo � o.ao� � a.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ roian-a v.:.son: s.i� ai�: iso300000a vaQe 3 z�rncorzn: o�-ao-isss io:3a:oi PoaB F13e: Ns\0383d\INFILT .PlID IaElow HydropraDbs w:\0383f\NVLL .BYD Wlfloov 8y8roqreph: w:\03836\O9T .eYD INFLOW HYDROGR11P8 AOOTIN6 COt@DTATIONS ' _"""'_"""_" _'_'_"__""'__'_""'_""""""'_""__""""" � xx� � xemnow � � xi+xs � as�e - o � sa�e . o � ooamnow �HLSVAT20N� � (hre) � (cfe) � � (cfe) � (cfe) � (cfe) � (efe) � (ft) � I""""�"_"""I I""""'�""""""I"""""'�""""'I'_"__"_� � is.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� a.00 � o.00 � � is.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.ao � � ie.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.ao � � is.zoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 16.300 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � � is.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 16.600 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � is.aoo � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 16.900 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i�.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � v.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � , � v.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i�.3oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � v.aoo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i�.soo � a.00� � o.o � -o.i � -a.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i�.soo. � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i�.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i�.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � v.900 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.3oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.oa � o.00 � � ie.aoo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.soa � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � ie.soo � o.ao� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � ie.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.eoo � o.00l I o-� I -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ie.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � iv.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.iao � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.soo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is,aoa ( o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � iv,soa � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 19.600 � a.00� � o.o � -o a � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � is.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � i9.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 19.900 � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 I . � . � zo.000 � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ POPD-Y Versions 5.17 8/Bi 1903000003 Paqe d 8x8COTED: 07=]0-1995 10�36i01 PoaB Files Mt\03834\INFILT .P� Inflow 8ydroqraDh: r�\03836\NULL .HYD Outflow HyBroQraph: w:\03836\OOT .HYD INFIAW 8YDR06RAP9 RODTSNO CO!lPOTATIONB """"""""" """"""""""""""'__'_"""""'_""_"'_ � Txe� � x�r.ow � � xi.xa � asic - o � saic . o � ova�ri.ow �snsv�.Txo�� (hre) � (efe) � � (cfe) � (efe) � (cfe) � (cfe) � (ft) � �""_"'�""""'� �'_"""'�""""""�"""""'I""""'I"_""_'� � �o.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � za.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � �a.3oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � , � zo.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � ao.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � so.eoo � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ao.�oo � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ao.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � so.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.000 � o.ao� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � si.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.aoo � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � u.aoo � o.00� � o.a � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � si.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ai.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i) o.00 � o.00 � � ss.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� a.00 � o.00 � � sz.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � as.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ax.3oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.aoo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � zz.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.ao � o.00 � � aa.�oa � o.00� � a.o � -a.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � sz.eoo � o.00� � a.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � sa.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � s3.oao � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � a3.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.zoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.ao � � as.3oo { o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00. � � aa.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � as.soa � o.00� � a.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.eoa � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � as.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � �s.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � 53.900 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � a.00 � � aa.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � �a.aoo � o.oa� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � sa.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � aa.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ POND-2 Vereioa� 5.17 6/N� 1903000003 pa0e 5 E7�COTEDs 07=20-1995 10x36i01 . Pond Files wt\03834\IlIIPILT .PDID Inflw 8y8roQrnyhs w:\03834\NULL .HYD Outflow eydropraphs r:\03834\OOT .HYD INFL04P HYDROGPAPH AODTINO COlSOTATIONB I. """"""""" "_"""_"""""""_"__""""""""""""' � ma� � xrmi.ow � � xi+zs � �si� - o � asie . o � omrecow �ELEVATIONI � (hrs) � (efa) � � (cfe) � (cfe) � (efe) � (cfe) � (ft) � �""""�""""'� �""""'�'_"""""�"""""'�""""'I"_"""� � sa.�ao � o.aa� � a.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � sa.eoo � o.oa� � a.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � �a.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -a.i� o.oa � o.00 � � as.000 � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ss.ioo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.oa � o.00 � � as.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � zs.3oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.ao � � ss.aoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � �s.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � ss.soo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � as.�oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � as.eoo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � � �s.9oo � o.00� � o.o � -o.i � -o.i� o.00 � o.00 � ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------ I P06D-] Vezeioas 5.17 8/Bx 1903000007 Pnqa 6 E7�COTED: 07=]0-1995 10�36�01 •��a«��ti:u:tt• g��Y OF RODTING CONPOTATIONB :��»:::��x�e�u• Poad Filex w:\03836\INFILT .PND Iaflow HydroqrapL: r:\03836\�L .BYD Outflow Hydroyrayh: w:\03836\ODT .HYD etartiaq Pond w.e. Sleva[ioa . 0.00 ft � •*+*� eu�ry of Peak Outfloa aad Peak 8levatioa y*t*• � Peak Inflow � ].00 efa Peak Outflow e 0.88 CFa Peak Sleoatioa � 1.67 ft •**�• 8u�8ry of Ayytozlmate Peak 8toraqe •�y*• Iaitial etoraqe = 0.00 ac-fC Peak etOiaqe Fiom 8toxm . 0.02 8C-£C "_____'__"'_' 1bta1 etolaqe ia POnd e 0.02 aC-fY �� »>» HarniaQ, iaitial yond wYflow > 1et iaflow ordiaate. ««< , POND-Y Vessioh: 5.17 8/N� 190300000Y Pape 7 Poad File� w:\03834\INPILT .PND Iaflow Hydroqrayhe rs\03836\tiOI.L .HYD Outflow HydroQrnyh: w:\03834\OOT .H1[D S7�COTEDs 07-20-1995 Peak Iaflow . 2.00 efe 10s34:01 aenk Outflov . 0.88 efe Peak 8leoation . 1.67 ft �' ♦ Flom (cPe) o.o o.s i'.o i.s a.o a.s a.o s.s a.o a.s s.o s.s •------1-----I-----1-----I-----I-----I-----I-----I-----I-----I-----I- I ii.a -�x I= ii.s -�x �x 31.6 -�x �x 11.7 -�x �x 11.8 -�x �R 31.9 -�a ' x e 12.0 -� x � I x • 12.1 -� x � � x � 12_2 -� x * I R a 13.3 -� x • I x ' 12.4 -� x + � x + 12.5 -� x� � • x 12.6 -�` x �� x 12.7 -�• x �� x 12.8 -�• x �• x 12.9 -�+ x �+ x 13.0 -�• a �* x 13.1 -�x IR 13.2 -�x �s 13.3 -�x � TID1L+ (hie) • Fi3e: w:\03836\NOLL .HYD Qmez = 2.0 cfs x File: a:\03834\ODT .HYD Qmax = 0.9 cfa l� i , = �Gu:b�f #z . EXHIBIT • 4 � �� -----_ RUNOFF AAID STORMWATER MANAGII�Tl GENERAL 7he aite of the proposed Stop and Shop Shpermarket ard Jeffers T�m}wr Corp. Mi�ll is located on the Salem/Peabody corporate boimdary adjacent to Howley Street in Peabody and Boston Street 3n Salem, Massachusetts. The aite is located imnedi.ately to the south of the North River and ia within the watershed of that �t�y. EXIST7NG CANDITIONS The site has, for the most part, been uti]ized for itdustri.al purposea for many yeara., In the existing condition, .surface r}wracteristics of the site include *p��*+a of firrravaged � exist buil s - �1�9, ved and dirt surfac �8 �g , Pa ed areas, a wooded slope in the southeast portian of the aite ffiY1 minimal la�m areas adjacent to the existing residential atructures on Boston Street in Sal�. Grasses and shLvb growth occur in those portions of the aite which are little used presently, but are not considered to exert appreciable influence upon aite hydrology. Site coverages in the existing co�d.ition are swrmarized as fol- lows: SURFACE TYPE ` ARF.A (Ac) % of Total Buildic►8$ 0.8 10.5 Foimdations (conc, floors) 0..75 9.9 Gravel or dirt yard areas 2.7 35.5 Grassed Areas 0.81 10.6 Paved Areas 1.35 17.7 Wooded Slopea 1.2 15.8 TUTAL.S 7.61 100.00 PROP0.SID CANDITIONS The propoaed Site Developoimt Plan consiata of the construction of a scop ana snop supeiv�arket cogecnar wicn parking ana loaaing -- az'eas, landscePed areas and improvement of the wooded alopes by addition of appropriate landscape species, alope cleaning and atabilization. 73ie Jeffera portion of the aite is to be ze- worked to incorporate the e�dating Mill Butlding into the present I,�mnber Storage Building and p�ovide for improved parking and circulation, The exi.ating residential buildings are to be pre- served. Site coverages in the propoaed oonlition are simmarized as fol- lows: S1�DP & SEiOP �g,�� Area (Ac) % of Total Area (Ac) % of Total B�uldir►ga 1.44 18.9 .24 3.2 Paved Areas 3J4 49.3 _ .28 3.7 Isndscaped .90 11.6 .22 2.9 Natural Areas .79 10.4 SITE HYDROI,OGSC Fsti.mated peak rates and vol�es of nmoff for ten and acie tam- dred year atoffi events have been calculated utilizi�g a computer solution for methodolo _ resented in the Uni 8Y P ted States Depart ment of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Tectmical Release 55, "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds". Calculatioais of nawff curve rnanbers azd hydrograph simulation (from the tabular , �mit trydro8raph method) follow. 7he results of the analysis are s�narized as follows: �� PRfiWNSIItUCTION P0.SICONSTRUCTION RENRN PEAK RUNOFF RUNOFF VOII7ME PEAK RUNOFF RUNOFF PIItiOD (CFS) (AC-FT) (CFS) VOLUME (AC-Ff) 10 YEAR 19 2.21 22 2.35 100 YF.�1B 30 3.57 35 3.72 � _ _ 4 Although an increase in peak nmoff rates and wlwnes will occur tn the postdevelopment condition, the impact of that increase is considered to be of minimal aignificance for the follo�aing rea- sons: 1, The aite is located t�miediately adjacent to the North River, well downstream from the major portion of, contributing waterahed; . 2. Site peak nmoff rates are expected to xcur well before peak nawff frooi the u�stream waterahed occura; 3. In a one himdred year event,. it is anticipated that ' . peak nuioff rate irtii be of minimel importance aince the aite is, in part, located vithin the flood plain of the North River. W �h�b��3 _ ��-�-�: � � IXHIBIT ��'� � SOMMER;�ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. � �� . :-n 65 N WAKEFIELD. TELEPHONE (617)246-5360 STOP fi SHOP - 19 HOALEY STREET� .PEABODY/SALEM � SYNOPSIS OF APPLICABLE 310 CMR 10.00 REGIILATIONS / PROJECT IMPACT . I. 310 CMR 10 . 54 Bank 4 (a) 1. Stability of bank / Installation of 15+/- foot ', outfall 2 . Water carrying capacity / No Ef£ect 3 . Groundwater or surface water quality / No Effect 4 . Breeding habitat / No Effect 5 . Alteration of up to 10% or 50 feet / Alteration of 15 +/- � , <10% 4 (c) 6 . Rare or endangered species / No Effect 310 CMR 10. 55 Borderin4 Vegetated Wetland ("BVW") 4 a No alteration of BVW No Alteration ( ) / (b) <5, 000 sq. ft. with replication / - I (d) Rare or endangered species / None Present 310 CMR 10 . 56 Land Under Water Bodies (River) 4 (a) 1. Water carrying capacity / No Effect 2 . Groundwater or surface water quality / No Effect 3 . Breeding areas / Not Impacted 4 . Important wildlife habitat / None Present 5. Rare or endangered species / None Present 310 CMR 10. 57 Borderinq Land :Sub�ect to Floodina 4 (a) 1. Compensatory storage provided / Complete Storage . Provided 2 . No restriction of flow by compensatory storage / No Restriction of Flow *3 . Important wildlife habitat / None Present; The area has been significantly altered and therefor the habitat function have been effectively elimi- nated (310 CMR 10. 57 (1) (a) (3) ) . ,u. _. __ .._::> _ _ >.:r::s . . . .. . . . . . � . � ._ �? 'F �F'W 6Y- . . . . .. �4A. � 1�Mn K Yi. ,./ � . . ' e'l � . � . . � i`.�%�'�t� �. Continued 310 CMR 10. 00 Regulations �`` 310 CMR 10. 57 Isolated Land Subiect to Floodincx ("ISLF"1 Area must confine standing water to a volume of at least 1/4 acre foot and an average depth of 6 inches / No ISLF Present 4 (b) l. Flood damage due to filling which otherwise would be confined 2 . No adverse effect to public or private water supply 3 . Prevention of pollution 4 . Vernal _pool , 5 . Rare and endangered species II. Water Oualitv Treatment and Reductiori of pollutants such as oil/grease, nutri- ents, and silt A. Storm water collection 1. All catch basins equipped with MDC traps 2 . a. Front/collection into gas/oil trap b. Rear/BMB; collection of drainage into a grassed swale to stormwater facility, (including Pront portion) c. Stormwater facility - further treatment prior to discharge III . Conclusion This project provides full compliance with all applicable regulations under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. Short term (construction) and long term maintenance of these systems will be scheduled at a periodicity which will maximize the effectiveness of a71 systems. 310cmr. reg SOMMER ENV[RONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES. 1NC. , �kr�; �,T�y - EXHIBIT . � � GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUI,i1NG SERVICES 204 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 July 19, 1995 �soa� �as-ssia � FAX (508) 741-8648 Mr. William Luster Salem Planning Director One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear 1NIr. LLster: I reviewed the Nouce of Intent and supporting documents submitted to the Salem Conservadon Commission by the Stop & Shop Company on May 26, 1995 and, with my assistant Joseph Orzel, inspected the wedands and existing conditions during a site visit of the property. These are my fmdings. , The Norice of Intent,plans and supporting documentation for the filing provide general and specific detail about the project but addirional information regarding the resowce azeas and extent of flooding is necessary. 1. NOI Form Part I. Item 2 Under description of the project no mention is made of the fact that the property may be listed on the hazardous waste list nor as to whether any remediadon is required nor any precaudons noted to be taken when work is to occur at the site to protect the Wedand Resource Area and the North River from site contanunation. A former mill property is listed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as a Location To Be Investigated (I.TBn at 9 Howley Street,Peabody (Site#3-3319). I believe that this site is a portion of the pmperty under review. 2. NOI Form Part I. 7c Should remediation of the property be necessary, an additional filing fee of$525 - I $725 would be required. 3. NOI Form Part I. Item 11C- Resource Areas Although no box is provided, the resource area,Land Subject to Tidal Activity, should be entered and checked. 4. N41 Form Part II - Soils One of the small wetlands not protecterl under the Mass DEP Wedand Regulations has wetland plants and hydrology and is a federal wefland. Soil and hydrology informarion are necessary. -'' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 5. NOI Form- Flowing Water Bodies No mention is made of the natural fluctuation of the elevation of the North River nor in the fluctuarion of the river elevadon as a result of flooding. 6. NOI Form Part III- Work Description Point Source Dischazg�. The dischazge to the North River is a Point Source Discharge,please pmvide the necessary informarion required in items 1-4. 7. NOI Form Part IV - Miag�rine Measures a. Please indicate how performance standards will be met for Inland Bank; Inland Bordering Land Subject to Flooding and Land Under Water Bodies. Land Subject to Tidal Acuon does not have performance standards but the impact on the resource area should be aduressed and any mirigating measwes described. b. Please indicate how gas and oil separators will work during periods of flooding on the site. 8. Exhibit C -Environmental Impact Statement Land• The Howley Street property may be listed as a Site Location To Be Invesrigated by the Massachusetts Deparnnent of Environmental Protecrion. Please indicate the extent of contamination and any necessary remediation and the procedures to be taken to protect the wedands. Water and Wetlands. There is a question regarding whether or not the proposed activity shall result in more frequent flooding on the property. At this locaaon, the North River also includes the Resource Area Land Subject to Tidal Action. Will there be any impact from the project on this Resource Area? Hay bales with biodegradable cordage should be utilized. What is the impact of construction and operation of the new point source discharge on the Resource Area Land Under Water Body? Describe the natural and flood elevauon of the North River. What effect will this river elevation have on the water elevation in the drainage system, in the runoff water treatment system and in the presence of flood water at the site? What will be the effect of flooding on water quality at the site? The area identified in the northwest corner of the property as an abandoned raikoad spur containing greater than 50% wetland vegetarion is actually a federal wetland and alterations to this area must be pemutted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the 404 Program. Therefore, a Mass Water Quality Certificadon must also be obtained. Where on the site will this wetland azea be replicated? 9. Exhibit D -Drainage Calculations Both the pre and post development peak runoff rates should be provided for both the 10 yeaz and 100 yeaz storm events. It appears that only the post development 10 year calcularions aze provided. `' GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. The calculations should be summarized and signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer. The proposed drainage system and drainage calculadons have been reviewed by Charles Quigley, the Salem City Engineer. 10. Exhibit E - Volume Calculaaons The calculations pmvided show an overall increase in flood storage volume as well as increases in flood storage at each incremental elevarion. T'he calculauons should be signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer. 11. Exhibit F- Resource Area Descrinrions The isolated vegetated wedand is not called out as a federal wedand and should be delineated as such. Adequate details aze not provided on mirigauon measures to protect LUWB during construcrion/installation of open box culvert at the North River, and there is no mention of miugauon/replicauon of the federal weUand which will be fIlled (this wetland is located in Peabody, however). 12. Exhibit G -Habitat Evaluations It is the opinion of GMRC that, under the regularions, no wildlife habitat evaluations are required. The linear length of Bank to be altered is under the threshold values of 10% or 50 feet, whichever is smaller(310 CMR 10.54(4)(a)(5)). Under the regularions (310 CMR 10.57(1)(a)(3)), areas of Bordering Land Subject to Flooding "which have been so extensively altered by human acrivity that their important wildlife habitat functions have been effecdvely eliminated" do not require a habitat evaluation. On June 20, 1995, I conducted a site inspection of the property accompanied by my assistant, Joseph Orzel. The wetlands at the site were inspected and evaluated according to the � Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act and Regulations. GMRC is in agreement with the delinearion under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act as submitted with the Notice of Intent for the project. However, it should be noted that the isoiated wedand area described in the Notice of Intent which contains greater than 50% wetland vegetarion is a federal wedand and should be delineated as such. If you have any quesrions concerning this matter, please contact me at the letterhead address or phone number. Sincerely, Hug . ulligan, Ph.D.,LS D'uector _ . � • �� fch�#� EXHIBIT -- � 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EVALUATION HOWLEY AND MAIN STREET PROPERTY SALEM AND PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS This Executive Summary is based on a draft Environmental Si[e Assessmen[ report prepared for Stop & Shop Companies, Inc., dated July 14, 1993, by GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. of Newton, Massachusetts. Site Descriation The study site consists of 5 conuguous pazcels of land located at the intersection of Howley and Main Street, comprising approximately 7 acres of land almost equally divided by the Salem and Peabody town line, . Appro�cimately 14 buildings are present at the site; several have been partially or totally destroyed by fire in 1989. The North River Canal, a small, apparently manmade drainage canal is located 'unmediately nonh of the smdy site. Site History Historical use of the property was documented through the use of Sanborn Historical Adases dating back to 1887. In summary, the western portion of the site along Howley Street (formerly Grove Street) was used for tannery activity from the late 1800's to the mid-1980's, while the eastern portion of the site was used by lumber companies supporting the local tanneries . Historical atlases indicate that several other tanneries occupied the general azea west of the study site along Main Street, extendfn almost R(� feet westerl � Y towazd the present day center of town. Regulatory Status and Remedial Actions One of the site parcels, 9 Howley Street, Peabody, is presenfly identified as a °Location to be Investigated" by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. This listing is most likely the result oP a fire which desfroyed the tannery buildings in March 1989. ENPRO of Newburyport, Massachusetts was engaged to perform remedial activiues aPter the �re. These activities included the removal of drums, the removal of liquids from certain aboveground and underground storage tanks, and ultimately the removal oP asbestos from the site. A DEP memo da[ed March 17, 19R9, indicaled that "no further action wus required of (the) Emergency Response" division. 1 , . Previous Studies Two previous studies which included subsurface explorations were conducted in 1991 and 1992 by Pine and Swallow, Inc. These studies included the excavation of over 25 test pits to directly observe subsurface conditions, the completion of 16 groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate groundwater quality, sampling of the North River Canal, and thc completion of 7 micro wells for further water quality analysis. The key findings of the Pine and Swallow report were: • a recommendation [o DEP that the site be classifed as a "non-priority" site, • the detecdon of groundwater contaminadon "below Massachusetu Drinking Water Guidelines" with the exception of one compound--chloroform (1991), • the detection of only "localized" azeas of soIl contaminants in four azeas, i • an evaluation that the nearby North River Canal had not been impacted by VOC's, ' and I • the detection of only "localized" groundwater contamination in the area of a subsurface concrete vault and a recommendadon that groundwater does not need remediation (1992). The primary sourc.,-of the limited soil and groundwater wntamination were abandoned underground storage tanks (CTST's), and a subsurface concrete vault, possibly used to collect flow from floor drains in a former building. Studies bv GZA, 1993 In order to confirm the findings of other studies, GZA conducted an independent investigadon of the site on behalf of Stop & Shop Companies. The GZA study consisted of the excavaaon of an addidonal 20 test pits by use of a backhoe, the completion of an additional6 monitoring wells, and the sampling of numerous wells installed by others. The locauon of these test pits and wells was selected to collect data in azeas not investigated i during previous swdies, and to confirm the limited areas of soil and groundwater contamination previously repoRed by Pine and Swallow. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for compounds typically associated with tanneries including VOC's, heavy metals, semi-volatile organic compounds, and PCB's. 2 i . - � . ✓' In summary, GZA's findings confirmed the cesults of previous studies. That is: A) Groundwater quality has not been significandy impacted by site activities. Water quality analyses at 20 locaaons analyzed by GZA did not exceed DEP's "Reportable Concentrapons" (RC's) for any of [he compounds analy��ed, assuming a GW-2 classificadon. B) Elevated heavy metals were not detected in any of the four water samples analyzed. C) Soil contaminadon requiring remediation appears confined to two areas near abandoned UST's, and near a subsurface concrete vault. In summary, potential remedial activities necessary to move this site to a conclusion in the Massachusetts Contingency Plan include the removal of abandoned UST's, and any sunounding contaminated soils, and the removal of localized contaminated soils from the area of a subsurface concrete vault. The three subsurface investigation programs have not detected conditions which would warrant groundwater �emediation. , 3 � ;, --� " IXHIBIT ��M � ��P+E��EW Consulting —'�--- V Engineering FTlVICOIll1l2Iltd� �yy5 Hydrogeology COIlSU��TltS,Inc. JUL 2 7 Applied Sciences July 25, 1995 ual�ITl N1311t91fIg U8p1. Project 94140 Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission Salem City Hall One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 � RE: Submittal of Written Comments and Questions ' Notice of Intent - Super Stop & Shop Boston Street and Howley Street Salem and Peabody, Massachusetts Dear Chairman Harney: This submittal of written comments to the Salem Conservation Commission by Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Ransom) is made on behalf of Hoang Tri Lam (Abutter) of 79 Beaver Street in Salem, Massachusetts, for the purpose of presenting comments and questions on the Notice of Intent (NOI) filing for the proposed Super Stop & Shop located at Boston and Howley Streets in Salem and Peabody, Massachusetts (the site). The following comments and questions were verbally presented on behalf of Mr. L,am to the Salem Conservation Commission (SCC) at the public hearing on Thursday, May 11, 1994. However, because this meeting was deemed illegal by the city of Salem solicitor, the SCC requested that Ransom resubmit them for the record. The request was by the SCC was made on July 20, 1995. They comments and questions are as follows: 1. The discussion by the applicanYs consultant regarding the nonrequirement to perform a wildlife habitat evaluation pursuant to 310 CMR 10.60 is incorrect. The basis for the appeal for the Peabody NOI to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) for a superseding order of conditions for the site dated August 22, 1994 was for the following reason: "The general performance standards for bordering land subject to flooding [310 CMR 10.57 (4)(a)] were not adequately addressed by the Applicant. Specifically, work proposed within bordering land subject to flooding shall not impair its capacity to provide important wildlife habitat functions [310 CMR 10.57 (4)(a)(3)]. The proposed project will alter greater than 5,000 square feet of land within the bordering land subject to flooding resource area as shown on 'Detail Development Plan Proposed Supermarket Peabody & Salem, Mass' Sheet D of 7. The NOI did not evaluate wildlife habitat as set forth in 310 CMR 10.60 (1)(a) and 310 CMR 10.60 (2)." Brown's Wharf 235 Promenade Street 45 Knollwood Road 90 Washington Valley Road Newburyport,MA 01950 Providence,RI 02908 Elmsford,NY 10523 Bedminster,NI 07921 Tel (508)465-1822 Tel (401)8613655 Tel (914)345-2116 Tel (908)719-8947 Fax(508)465-2986 Fax�401�861-7866 Fax(914�345-2123 Fax(908�719-8967 , Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission Until this matter is clarified by MA DEP, we request that the SCC not render an opinion. 2. With regard to the calculations provided by the applicant in Ea�hibit B for both the NOI Attachment D - Drainage Calculations and NOI Attachment E - Volume Calculations, will the SCC, City Engineer, or your consultant review them? It appeared at the May 11, 1995 meeting that you will engage an outside consultant to perform the review of these attachments. We also urge that your consultant review and comment on the design of the drainage system, especially the location of the open channel and its ability to function as a site-wide discharge point to Yhe North River. 3. The applicant discussed the poor ground water quality at the site. We did not find any reference to this in the NOI or the handout prepared by the applicant and distributed at the meeting. If this is a concern of the applicant, then they must address these questions, at a minimum: a. Has an environmental site assessment been performed at the site in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 21E, the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0000) (MCP) or other guidance document? If so, what are the results? b. Is the site a listed hazardous waste site or a location to be investigated (LTBI)? If so, what MCP required work is being done? c. Is the site a confirmed hazardous waste site? If so, what MCP required work is being done? Are there any reports that document the conditions at the site? d. Will any soil be removed from the site? If so, how much and will it be treated as hazardous waste? e. What precautions will be taken at the site to ensure no negative impacts to resource areas? At a minimum, soil and ground water chemical analyses must be performed prior to initiating site work. These data will be used as a baseline upon which to measure activities at the site with respect to performance standards in 310 CMR 10.00 and the MCP. f. During construction of the proposed open channel beneath the railroad tracks and along the bank, how will the applicant determine if the soils and ground water are contaminated with "tannery and related wastes?" If contamination is encountered, what measures will be taken to ensure protection of the resource area? Ransom Project 94140 Page 2 salmcc2.ltr July 25, 1995 . � Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission 4. We recommend that the SCC closely review the drainage system. Especially note the presence of a vertical wall up to approximately 30 feet high along the Boston Street property line. There are three connecting storm drains along the Boston Street side of this wall. One drain has an upper invert elevation of 36.50 feet and a lower invert elevation of 9.00 feet (Sheet D of 7 dated June 15, 1993 , rev. April 28, 1995). How will this part of the system work? It apparently discharges to the swale. Also, how many roof drains are proposed and where are their discharge points? Although the main parking lot is in Peabody, this question is relevant. If the parking lot drainage system is below the FEMA 100-year flood elevation of 11 feet, how will the drainage system funclion during flood periods? As proposed, surface water runoff from the northeastern portion of the site, near and at the compensatory storage area, must flow uphill to discharge through the open channel to the North River. MA DEP commented on this "impossible natural feaY' and wanted it addressed. The applicant did not address this in their filing to the SCC. 5. According to the applicanYs consultant, water from the North River rarely flows over the railroad tracks because it is at elevation approximately 9.50 feet. Abutters and residents of the area, some who have lived there for 42 years, dispute this statement. As proposed, the open channel, located under the railroad tracks, has an invert elevation of approacimately 5.3 feet. It appears reasonable to assume that during flood conditions, not just 100-year floods (elevation 11 to 12 feet), water will back up onto the site. We want to have this addressed because it appears that an unacceptable situation will be made worse with the development of the site. 6. There is confusion on our part as to what has happened to the compensatory storage areas. They are shown on the Peabody NOI, but have ]argely been removed on the Salem NOI. The question is why? Have the site or performance standards for border land subject to flooding (310 CMR 10.57 inclusive) changed since the Peabody NOI filing? The applicant seems to be constantly changing what is going on at the site, even after filings and appeals. How is this justified? The question is - What are the performance standards for bordering land subject to flooding for this site. It is our opinion that the performance standards are not met under the Wetlands Protection Act, specifically 310 CMR 10.57(4)(a)(1,2, and 3). How is compensatory storage being addressed for the portion of the site that will be occupied by the proposed building? This is not adequately addressed in the NOI. Ransom Project 94140 Page 3 salmcc2.ltr July 25, 1995 > Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission 7. There are inconsistencies in the NOI. For example, on page 3-2 , item 11, the applicant has not checked off bordering land subject to flooding, yet they go on to describe this resource area on page 3-5, part IV. In addition, there are differences between the Peabody NOI and Salem NOI. However, this is the same project and site. Why is this? If you have any questions or require further information, please contact our office. Sincerely, RANSOM ENVIRONMENTAL NSULTANTS, INC. � � Raymo . alkmgton, P , . . Vice P sident of Technic Services RWTsh cc: Hoang Tri Lam Maureen Kiley William R. DiMento, Esquire, DiMento & DiMento Paul Sommer, Sommer Environmental Technologies Chris Mello, Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. John Serafini, Esquire, Serafini, Serafini & Darling Ransom Project 94140 Page 4 salmcc2.ltr July 25, 1995 EXHIBIT . � U SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERALSTREET SALEM, MASSACMUSETT501970 JOHN R. SEFAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN q. SEFAFINI,JR. 508-J44-0212 JOHN E. OARLING 61�-561�2�43 ELLEN M. WINKLEN TELECOPIER JOSEPM G COPRENTI 508-�41-<693 July 27, 1995 Frederick J. Harney, Jr. , Chairman, Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Response to written comments of Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. ("Ransom") concerning the Notice of Intent - Super Stop & Shop, Boston Street and Howley Street, Salem and Peabodv Massachusetts Dear Chairman Harney: This response is presented on behalf of the Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Inc. and John C. Jeffers (collectively "Stop & Shop") to the written comments of Ransom dated July 25, 1995 which were submitted to the Commission. The responses below are numbered to correspond with the comments listed in the Ransom letter, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1. The issue of a wildlife habitat evaluation has been fully addressed by Stop & Shop and is part of the NOI submission, Attachment G, filed with this Commission. In summary, the proposed project will not alter wildlife habitat in excess of the thresholds permitted under 310 CMR. The site is comprised primarily of urbanized and industrial land and the proposed construction "will not adversely effect food, shelter, or migrating and breeding areas for wildlife. " 2 . No response is necessary as the commission has, in fact, engaged an outside consultant to review the application. � Frederick J. Harney, Jr. , Chairman July 27, 1995 Page 2 3 . a. Stop & Shop has voluntarily performed an environmental site assessment, the results of which were submitted to the Planning Board and the Board of Health. In summary, 2 or 3 isolated areas of contamination around underground storage tanks have been identified. Stop & Shop proposes to remove the tanks and any contaminated surrounding soils prior to development of the site. Groundwater monitoring wells at twenty locations within the site indicate no reportable concentrations of groundwater contamination. b. The site is designated as a location to be investigated ("LTBI") by DEP. Once Stop & Shop becomes the owner of the site, it will perform all work required by and in accordance with DEP regulations. c. The site is listed by the DEP as an LTBI and possibly as a confirmed hazardous waste site. Once the project is approved and Stop & Shop becomes the owner of the site it will comply with the MCP and all other applicable environmental regulations. All environmental reports prepared by Stop & Shop regarding the site are on file with the Planning Board and the Board of Health. d. Most soils will likely be recycled and reused on site while some soil will be removed from the site. Any petroleum contaminated soil shipped from the site will be shipped pursuant to all applicable regulations. e. There are 22 sampling locations at the site which i has allowed the site to be adequately characterized. No negative impact has been identified to the resource areas. f. While we do not suspect any tannery contamination in this area, some screening or testing of the soils will be conducted prior to removal during construction. If contaminated soils and/or groundwater are identified, Stop & Shop will comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning the handling of such materials. f Frederick J. Harney, Jr. , Chairman July 27, 1995 Page 3 4 . The 30 ft drop will be provided through the use of a drop manhole. The flow will be contained within the drainage structure. The stormwater flow will then proceed to the grass swale behind the truck dock. There initially was one roof drain shown on the north side of the building as shown on sheets 5 and 11 of the submission plans. This roof drain system is being revised. We are now proposing another roof drain at the west (front) face of the building in addition to the roof drain at the north end of the building. The purpose of this new drain is to provide a source of clean water for the purpose of recharging storm water runoff to the groundwater. We are proposing the installation of an infiltration system to mitigate the loss in groundwater recharge due to the proposed increase in impervious building and paced parking surfaces on the site. The infiltration system has been designed to infiltrate the difference in runoff volumes between pre and post development conditions. 5. Existing stormwater flows in the North River adjacent to the site are contained within it's banks until the water level reaches the elevation of the railroad tracks, approximately elevation 9.5. When the River breaches the elevation of the track the site floods. Under the proposed condition, there will be a new drainage connection of the site drainage system to the river at elevation 5. 3. When the North River flooding occurs, water will begin immediately backflowing into the site drainage system. This new drainage system will provide additional flood storage to the North River for flooding below elevation 9.5. The development of the site, therefore, will have a positive effect on the ' flooding of the North River. 6. Detailed computations accompanied the Notice of Intent which described preconstruction and postconstruction storage characteristics on an incremental (foot by foot) basis for the site. For each elevation, greater storage volume exists in the proposed condition than in the existing. This is achieved by excavation into areas � Frederick J. Harney, Jr. , Chairman July 27, 1995 Page 4 of the site which are presently higher than the FEMA flood plain and are thus not presently available for flood storage. 7 . The NOI before the Commission does, on page 3-2 , have Bordering Land Subject to Flooding checked as a resource area within which work is to be proposed. The previously filed NOI did not have this resource area checked off due to a clerical omission in preparing the application. Further, no changes have been made to the NOI filed with the Peabody Conservation Commission. We would be happy to provide the Commission with any additional information upon request. Sincerely, THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY by its attorney, Jo� ,� �� Serafini�� JRS:jaf cc: Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. I .. . ' , EXHIBIT A ,:. ��'','�'� Consulting � �ANSOM � �O '1,�)M Engineering Environmental �� Hydrogeology Consultants,Inc. � Applied Sciences July 25, 1995 Project 94140 Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission Salem City Hail One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Submittal of Written Comments and Questions Notice of Intent - Super Stop & Shop Boston Street and Howley Street Salem and reabody, Niassacnuseits , Dear Chairman Harney: This submittal of written comments to the Salem Conservation Commission by Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Ransom) is made on behalf of Hoang Tri Lam (Abutter) of 79 Beaver Street in Salem, Massachusetts, for the purpose of presenting comments and questions on the Notice of Intenf (NOI) filing for the proposed Super Stop & Shop located at Boston and Howley Streets in Salem and Peabody, Massachusetts (the site). The following comments and questions were verbally presented on behalf of Mr. Lam to the Salem Conservation Commission(SCC) at the public hearing on Thursday, May 11, 1994. However, because this meeting was deemed illegal by the city of Salem solicitor, the SCC requested that Ransom resubmit them for the record. The request was by the SCC was made on July 20, 1995. They comments and questions are as follows: 1. The discussion by the applicanYs consultant regarding the nonrequirement to perform a wiidlife habitat evaluation pursuant to 310 CMR 10.60 is incorrect. The basis for the appeal for the Peabody NOI to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) for a superseding order of conditions for the site dated August 22, 1994 was for the following reason: "The general performance standards for bordering land subject to flooding [310 CMR 10.57 (4)(a)] were not adequately addressed by the Applicant. Specificaily, work proposed within bordering land subject to flooding shall not impair its capacity to provide important wildlife habitat functions [310 CMR 10.57 (4)(a)(3)]. The proposed project will alter greater than 5,000 square feet of land within the bordecing land subject to flooding resource area as shown on 'Detail Development Plan Proposed Supermarket Peabody & Salem, Mass' Sheet D of 7. The NOI did not evaluate wildlife habitat as set forth in 310 CMR 10.60 (1)(a) and 310 CMR 10.60 (2)." Pao�cn�s�A'har( 235 P�omenade Street a5 Knollwood Road 90 AVashingCon Valley Road Ne��tun•nor,\;A OI��iU Providi�nce. FI02908 E!ms(ord, NY 10523 Bedminsler. N1 07921 Tel i5081=�5-1322 Tel Dt0I13G1-3655 Tel 1914� >45-2116 Tel (9081719-8947 Fazi,50S1;65-2qSG Far.1��011 RGI-7R6G Faa(91a�3a5-2123 Fax190817148067 - ,. Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission Until this matter is clarified by MA DEP, we request that the SCC not render an opinion. 2. With regard to the calculations provided by the applicant in Exhibit B for both the NOI Attachment D - Drainage Calculations and NOI Attachment E- Volume Calculations, will the SCC, City Engineer, or your consultant review them? . It appeared at the May 11, 1995 meeting that you will engage an outside consultant to perform the review of these attachments. We also urge that your consultant review and comment on the design of the drainage system, especially the location of the open channel and its abiliry to function as a site-wide dischzrge point to the North River. 3. The applicant discussed the poor ground water qualiry at the site. We did not find any reference to this in the NOI or the handout prepared by the applicant and distributed at the meeting. If this is a concern of the applicant, then they must address these questions, at a minimum: a. Has an environmental site assessment been performed at the site in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 21E, the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0000) (MCP) or other guidance document? If so, what are the results? b. Is the site a listed hazardous waste site or a location to be investigated (LTBI)? If so, what MCP required work is being done? c. Is the site a wnfirmed hazardous waste site? If so, what MCP required work is being done? Are there any reports that document the conditions at the site? d. Will any soil be removed from the site? If so, how much and will it be trea?ed as haza:d�us ::�aste? e. What precautions will be taken at the site to ensure no negative impacts to resource areas? At a minimum, soil and ground water chemical analyses must be performed prior to initiating site work. These data will be used as a baseline upon which to measure activities at the site with respect to performance standards in 310 CMR 10.00 and the MCP. f. During construction of the proposed open channel beneath the railroad tracks and along the bank, how will the applicant determine if the soils and ground water are contaminated with "tannery and related wastes?" If contamination is encountered, what measures will be taken to ensure protection of the resource area? . Ransom Project 94140 Page 2 salmcc2.ltr Jaly 25, 1995 Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission 4. We recommend that the SCC closely review the drainage system. Especially note the presence of a vertical wall up to approximately 30 feet high along the Boston Street property line. There are three connecting storm drains along the Boston Street side of this wall. One drain has an upper invert elevation of 36.50 feet and a lower invert elevation of 9.00 feet (Sheet D of 7 dated June 15, 1993 , rev. April 28, 1995). How will this part of the system work? It apparently discharges to the swale. Also, how many roof drains are proposed and where are their discharge points? Although the main parking lot is in Peabody, this question is relevant. If the parking lot drainage system is below the FEMA 100-yeaz �1oed elevation of 11 feet, how will the drainage system function during flood periods? As proposed';surface water runoff from the northeastern portion of the site, near and at the com ensato stora e area must flow u hill to dischar e throu the P rY S � P 8 g11 open channel to the North River. MA DEP commented on this "impossible natural feat" and wanted it addressed. The applicant did not address this in their filing to the SCC. 5. According to the applicant's consultant, water from the North River rarely flows over the railroad tracks because it is at elevation approximately 9.50 feet. Abutters and residents of the area, some who have lived there for 42 years, dispute this statement. As proposed, the open channel, located under the railroad tracks, has an invert elevation of appro�mately 5.3 feet. It appears reasonable to assume that during flood conditions, not just 100-year floods (elevation 11 to 12 feet), water will back up onto the site. We want to have this addressed because it appears that an unacceptable situation will be made worse with the development of the site. 6. There is confusion on our part.as to what has happened to the compensatory storage areas. They are shown on the Peabody NOI, but have largely been removed on the Salem NOL The question is why? Have the site cr performance standards for border land subject to flooding (310 CMR 10.57 inclusive) changed since the Peabody NOI filing? The applicant seems to be constantly changing what is going on at the site, even afrer filings and appeals. How is this justified? The question is - What are the performance standards for bordering land subject to flooding fot this site. It is our opinion that the performance standards are not met under the Wetlands Protection Act, specifically 310 CMR 10.57(4)(a)(1,2, and 3). How is compensatory storage being addressed for the portion of the site that will be occupied by the proposed building? This is not adequately addressed i� the NOI. Ransom Project 94140 Page 3 salmcc2.ltr July 25, 1995 , � � Fred Harney, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission 7. There are inconsistencies in the NOI. For example, on page 3-2 , item 11, the applicant has not checked off bordering land subject to flooding, yet they go on to describe this resource area on page 3-5, part IV. In addition, there are differences between the Peabody NOI and Salem NOI. However, this is the same project and site. Why is this? If you have any questions or require further information, please contact our office. ; Sincerely, II RANSOM ENVIRONMENTAL NSULTAN'1'S, INC. � � Raymo . alkmgton, P ., . . Vice P sident of Techni Services RWTsh cc: Hoang Tri Lam Maureen Kiley William R. DiMento, Fsquire, DiMento & DiMento Paul Sommer, Sommer Environmental Technologies Chris Mello, Eastern Land Survey Associates, Inc. John Serafini, Esquire, Serafini, Serafini & Darling Ransom Project 94140 Page 4 salmcc2.ltr July 25, 1995 / I � EXHIBIT � I 1 SERAFINI, SERAFI LING ATTORNEYS AT LAW j�'��e�,��t � 63 FEDERALSTREET /� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 HUG � �I '�/� JOMN R. SEFAFINI. SR. SR'V'II C IqJ�TI��INT&f(�pNE W JOHN R. SERAFINI,JR. � �/� SOH-J44�0212 JOHN E. DAfiLING p �•, 617�581�2J43 ELLEN M. WINI[LER � ■ v JOSEPHC. CORRENTI 1!, TELECOPIER �^ . �� SOB-141�4603 / I � August 4, 1995 HAND DELIVER Frederick J. Harney, Jr. , Chairman, Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Response to Issues Raised by Conservation Commission Concerning the Notice of Intent - Stop & Shop Supermarket Boston Street and Howley Street, Salem Dear Chairman Harney: Enclosed is information requested by the Conservation Commission prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. on behalf of Stop & Shop Supermarket Company as follows: 1. Attachment A, "First Flush" Documentation 2 . Attachment B, Effects of Various Storms 3 . Attachment C, Best Management Practices Sincerely, THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY by its attorney, �� . � � Joseph C. Correnti �, JCC/ln enclosures cc: Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. enclosure SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING ATTORNEYS AT LAW , 63 FEOERALSTREET SAIEM, MA55ACHU5ETT501970 JOMN R. SERAFINI, SR. TEIEPHONE JOMN fi. SERAFINI.JR. 508�%44-0212 JOHN E. O/�RLING 61��SBI-2743 ELIEN M.WINItLER TELECOPIER JOSEPM C. CORRENTI . 508-�41�4683 August 4, 1995 Raymond W. Talkington, Ph.D. , P.G. Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. Brown's Wharf Newburyport, MA 01950 � RE: Stop & Shop Supermarket Company Salem Conservation Commission Boston and Howley Streets, Salem Dear Mr. Talkington: Enclosed please find a copy of the information requested by the Conservation Commission prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. on behalf of Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, a copy of which has been submitted to the Salem Conservation Commission. Very truly yours, l ' Gt-�� /d � ' ,Li��i.�:C, C.�, OSEPA C. CORRENTI i` h JCC/ln . enclosure cc: Salem Conservation Commission � �; � � � - � � � r � � � x y d n o � � �' � � z a � a � � ., 0 z , . ..e .��. ' . P 'Y'�+� ':4Ca i 1 > 7} L � �i t i 'i �L� � � ��.5 i � . . . � i xfi � . ^F [ k t��+y'��I )7 t'!� Yr . �( t��kk��Yf 0.¢,�S(� tt it F'. 1�, �?�� j � f -0 .�? Z i� 1 r: 1. � ::�.� � Fi ��:Tf '� r T;r � . �' �1 �/P4�rh��klrM��+A ,� 1/�` � '�7Yii-�ti y�Z� } u�� «� i � t:� i . lr r ; 7i. . f ��t �4 � k4R'N�i+fi� k : �� ;5�i �X�rLN�'�,'',-1Y..li)"S"3'K,t j � .ks' � � {A : f . � r : _ +.� n� ,2r p t � q �� it w� � � � �j A � }n t r: t��q''�.. K ! t i 3.� yc��l '� �5�, � � f.i 4�� v� S f � . , ':. ��^'i Yi� 5�i'}�i�.=.. �� . ,.,.��f }�„�Ai�� `� i �� 1 a i y �r 1 �i.s �`" r VI r f r �.� 7�f: � � _5�1� r .!� .�?. 1 r 1 :�. ��£�:g Y� wv. �. t 1! b.�.: � �l.w 1 . J'�.m'��.l��h� s�� r �.11 r f, i / n 9 � v}+ 1� � �.'a`-' .r ° • � �.y"�t ` n � ��\��pa�n,�" r�r" � � �g�y� Y ; t �: �� ;�t1 � l ,�paq�a5, �i � �' �Ap��'�j'�� i �� ,7.y hS� -u 1 ��'' "'� i t'1 �rtt a�� P ' uvJ r , i� �sf 1 < < ' � r'.-i� 7 � !� � � , � �,. V � �hE�� ,� i '� � � � i '� • �"� �� ' �`�F,Fb 1� !JI le^ f ��1 . � � t � - � t �. r � � 1 ��.�( {� �{ a ^I� \� �aM 4� � �� F��4jL'�� 1, iK`ASYI�'lV � 1� � 5i f �I . 1 p � � _ , �yld �� e)H�S� 1 .. . + � �n, ° ( �f . i �I a Y'��,�,1��,� � �" �� (�� v1)fps ,�''1�� `� ��: �'F, ��kkl��a � ��:i�Yr�"�1�+�' f' � � �fi,. : '�, + K r� -...k � �, y . : a,,�, �� i� ,i . ! t��(' � � } s'-�� t � .i�: �., ��i�� } �' .�5 R t�� i � ' ]I ': yr � .: t a . ��N' � k ;�f'�� y�[<'�',i�1 �y�� i „z �Y} i �' Stli "q��i C �'�. �w i ��'. l 7+ g � �p y�f��)r�� t�! ��t��'F�'�'�J � ^'�I.. ��, f y6 � f r �v'= r ', I A'J.�J� It �p'4� '1 I � 14t J �,�,..n 4�i ��5 �,� �k M 5 Fr u V /�f a /�{ f �.� F i `� %k �'"t� �tvN}# �.°'� .f +,El� �ri� RJ �c t � t �� 1 � �?. (�.� e ^� { •�i�tP, �5�, . � t [tr AG� "h'r�t .,$i � t� ( � .y J+ll'�'�. �a�4� y� {�t��E F ��`/qZ'9y�� t {11�t� �� J !� y� {��j/�h. �1 .L,,�. !. yinv L�°�r� � �rd e� ��l'Jl� m�� J�4�� ct{' �7� /`SF. Sj�a� '� ..� S� !'� '�� i�iv+ss�}( �r�y i�at��r�n $ 't,d'?3t�� (h<; t�r ) R"i' N� { � '+�k4 r,r�ie tt,�+�f�'..��r i,(c�� D� f�r t { �t��'J i � .,,:y��y y �: '�t 1 �R,•� t ry �, ¢�, . 1�� AeJ��N��'�f�y",Xc31 A��l.��t��r.�ti� �"� � y� t ,. "�r '� > ,',�,.at�. , aRt ' ��'��-J p�A-"�ii `�,y �" � 5+�M , � � s! ,� � ,�; , r„�"L� t�� . '�,i'Y��i ' a �f�qp��5.�'%'�iti),�K�r �k° f�a"�.}Y" tr1�.{ � �" �'j-;i � -�i aFi' 1 '�. j.i'r i �h.hs-S. ��' r !�� . �3 �.q �� '� ' ' « � �'(.{ ' lttv ;Rk Fr r �. '� ,�>55 y �iei`° rt f- � .r;� 'nv. A y �p i� 3 4 �, :}i� f4��1 �3 E �Y' ' � .':i %$6 � } �j� � � 'f' ?� t r t x ��a 7� . � i �� .��` ��'. '�"W�t. y i��f� .'�.jt' �� t sp� t�t f x � ��ci �� f+ �µ,`+1� 1�'i i. .+� � s�F [F�,! � � � � �f � � � (��iS Z}i� 'It �K� ;� }� �� T� U. . �{ �},� � 1j��q'` � rr� .r�. Kr �� ar�n ,r� � ST E ,� , i ��,��1 f y(x7.4�S� ,�`v�'µ€r, �'�c 't Sh+�3 e ':. i � t '�v$r� nu� � �`.� x e�'. .17 �y` �1 <Il'^ 'tl f -. Y� f t I F Y 43 V l tt) l ,3 . � �.�;� k� d{d !'' '� �Qr Z� 7 + p��r r } k �}:� '�3y r' '� 'Ae�J}��'��y ,�n a FP -. �1 1 r t FP.n d'rGi i� 3 Ir7. $ ��J��3 p5?o-ir+M 2fr) i ��'i��5� �^ lh �l� �'��: N- #'�� i � �1� Ku�� Y��t1a� ��z� ~��.�jf5b e i � }t�b!'2� Y r. -`jJ f y S,: r ,j�''['4 t,��i i�r� i�" <<�Y �� 4 3 +z' �,k.� � . i;% ! .i�J �}�7�",Y, y f V,v�kl� � v3 d i :A 1jt.t�}f�E'� 1� y n �� ,, ' �G. a �k.��v d h�[� t1L �� 51/� u/ t . {� "�y�.�� Y(�a.�C -�.t��'+�' n sfbifL � �yti�+�� i�-. �Fa 't v S .��,�� .�!1 4'4. 4�. � } ) e v e � f L L 4� � FJ�� < l��e�� i��h.lp��} T y o-4•1 �'i P y5� y h: } �<y i f:. N� �4 1 {1 l fll �j ,f� � i y �5��)r�f�A�"4 ��5'�r��f✓ ti � u �a6 t� �W)� 7. P�. . d��'S,yr�y Yy',��L�,Yn{, �h�JI Y4 �. m �t i!.� i �S(! 1�r .,�",, {�� ,i yry p� 1� ` � N h I I 3 A� � `�lj i'/&� I�� n � l Z D� �� 4� � y n IJ 1 1 '� } \ n 1 f Y k. F<� 4 � �S�p�v�sn��Ai�f v�Yr4tl�ai�Y,y� 1 C � . I d ��f o yafj� F -..� ' , 3 . <+ �� Y '�1Y 5 a �(+� `y �7 4 J� �- T y� �Ad f f� �� , ,; • _Y �� ' �� "f��,{�/�'��N �'��l�a"7111 �rid�„tt T '�t� +, t %..1`i�� ti. a '•� �� r A 4�5j5'i1��'iihilhrf�.v.i . ��'� .��'"i-�t �h '�i*, � �' � ' � l��} . ��. ( ^ Cj�{td! p1y� �r y i ' ( t C r{ �� 'Pn" 1 �y.; �i��pL Q{�� . .� , "�' � j tl�' `l�i ( f�f r u }i �4 Me Llti a 11.: 1] �.'� � 1 -.� .. � �r� �TJ+��f�' �, - �ai � 1 � F r oY Ga� ` f I �'f�. } � , ! � C.;i. � i ' +� �j � a L �,! �.;� � ! �� s'S.�r� � "i i t� } i + r':: r � ,{ A. j ..1�i� Ffi� �d .4 �F S YyiJ. t b��y(� 1 �i�l �l �i�ef{ s� i 1 t.� r �,(� . �. �(} �q . .Y � h� ;{t�,..1 �R�. �, � � �'v t�i,+� � ' aeY`i � � 3' ��rl� `'�t'-.:. � f�� .; �� t 7 .1/3�� y�� '. e e �[: S �i .. } � � p� 1 ,� t 1 � ` � xda � �.� . .��` i�`�s' Sx��;�'�v�'y��i A _ ry�. 5 ; �`; � � ' ,_ �� t� ` �.� ��' .��.,� ';"# �z �i'��`i��i.'�:,�hr,K'( �� . j� 1 rr� '..1 � r:r 1 ,.� ` � � Y ;t� , ,: ,t a' � k ,, {... ' . .. � j��'�� ,6. ��yr�� vti.'C�t ' _'L c c.� � � 3r z .�1 � ,�:�. d '; � f� I� ^ '..5. P' ��r� rrf.i.�*st 4V 4�1 s +� � :. �� j. t .�13 .,t,�,:�r4 � �M11 +� �, ' y ` h�`s a {sv'r ci � r \e � n,�� f r�i�:A:��d ra A { � Y.cei �':.,,f �a ' � i� rty.i �Y � .h f ' H �� .. ��1; `}( @5� °�S' � .7 �?J�{� kZ4.2 `.s I ) . f�(d�o � �� ; �S Ct.� T�v � �'�1 tt � }✓�tP -'� �fii ": �i �.. 1 ��..' �l} �!r ,F� ��u'�X,ifyv'°f�t4JI1�Y��A . �-k �tlrv. �^tj�,� { i� ti` fi�iy2Y.�,1i�. �l{ (,{. � r . �x � � t.tY�� ;tf i�...0 i..� . Jx �iS �� 1�1, � t i t 1�� Q t � 7t �y� �.�rtr �.�e� -„ u � t.Y R� �*ry}}i„y + ,� � tT yY kk�lFt,4 {� i�.Ck �)�t}t1 < ip .'' �r� t �, }� i r � p,,. Yn " !� }�'14 f� . D� ��qJ�4V� 3; y d.'�"{��r�'Uf�� }) �1y.'\��•ly d`f L1 FL *(� )' 4},.' 1 it t ... f , '� �*(t ✓ .�' .. 1:}. J a � � M1} , � J4 � s1 v 1.,. �. yt 1. 'S i.. )� 4� R5. t '- l�t F In! L 'bV 4. 4 < / � I�. X�!�. � JI 4 T`l N } ,:� \ � �� i �N�� ?� aX�''u��5f � iJ (y,Pf°J �'�J�f��"i�'Y ;..Sf}.�en r yi��!a.�1S i "`�r„r! �i��jE�.yiy�SV � +w_, Y 'k�f ✓y �, !. �p1. �� ' r e S � �.tx',�._ ' � f'Y n L� � �f,�s. ( .k � i �.t: � < ��':� l;pc`k1'.�'.whars-4.'.:,.�a _..._. _ - --- ----- . _ _ -- ---- _-- - I - ' . GlossarY - G.3 drawdown The gradual reduction i{t water level in a pond BMP due to the combined effect of infiltration and evaporation. dryfall The deposition of atmospheric pollutants on the land surface. emergent plants Aquatic plants that are rooted in the sediment but whose leaves are at or above the water surface. These wetland plants often have high habitat value for wildlife and waterfowl, and can aid in pollutant uptake. eutrophication The process of over-enrichment of water bodies by nutrients often . typified by the presence of algal blooms. event mean concentration (EMC) The average concentration of an urban pollutant measured during a storm runoff event. The EMC is calculated by flow-weighting each pollutant sample measured during a storm event. exfi ltration The downward movement of runoff through the bottom of an infiltration BMP into the soil layer. � fecal coliform bacteria Minute living organisms associated with human or animal feces that are used as an indirect indicator of the presence of other disease causing bacteria. filter fabric Textile of relatively small mesh or pore size that is used to (a) allow water to pass through while keeping sediment out (permeable) , or (b) prevent both runoff and sediment from passing through (impermeable) . first flush The delivery of a disproportionately large load of pollutants during the early part of storms due to the rapid runoff of accumulated pollutants . The first flush of runoff has been defined several ways (e.g. , one-half inch per impervious acre) . flood frequency The frequency with which the maximum flood may be expected to occur at a site in any average interval of years . Frequency analysis defines the ��n-year flood" as being the flood that will, over a long period of time, be equaled or exceeded on the average once every "n" years . flood plain For a given flood evei«, that area of land adjoining a continuous watercourse which has been covered temporarily by water. flow-weighting A statistical technique used to adjust a series of pollutant concentration measurements for the effect of flow. � - . • I Chapter 2: Choosing thr, .est BMP for a Site 2. 13 Figure 2.4: Comparative Pollutant Removal Of Urban BMP Designs i � �y � � Q`3 oQ, �y �O g O . �QyW Qyr 4PQ Q��,r �`' ` V�?`� ?� 3r : �� W �P! r �i 6 4 � � a BMP/desig n y`�ye �o' �°� a+ �`� m' �'� °� E%TENOEO DETENTON PONO OESIQN 1 � O � C O � MOOERATE OESIGN 2 • O � O � � MOOENATE UESIGN � • � O O � � MIQH KEY: WETPpNO O 0 TO 20%REMOVAI �ESI�H � � O O O C � MOOEMTE O =0 TO s0%AEMOVAL �ESICN 5 � 0 C O � � u00EPATE O �0 TO 80%REMOVAL OE91GN e • � O O � � H�QM � 40 TO BOXREMOVAL . • BO TO 100%REMOVAL INFIITRATION TPENGH /� NJ �NSUPFIGENT OESIGN ] � O O � � � ' MOOERATE NNOWlEOGE DESI�N B • O 0 � • � MIGM DESIGN 9 ' � � • • • MI�H , INFIITNATION BASIN DE91GN ] � O O � O � MOOENATE nesicN e � O O � � � ��cH OESIQN B • � � • • • HIGH . � POROUS PAVEMENT � OESIQN 7 0 � 0 � O � MOOEqATE OESIGN e • � � � • �+ q�pq OESIGN 9 • � � • � • NIGH wATEN OUAUTYINLET OESIGN /0 O � ('/� � � � �OW , FILTEF STRIP OESIGN n O O O O O � LOW �ESlGN 12 • O O � � � MOOERATE GHASSED SWALE DESIGN 13 O O O O O � ��W � oesi�n �. O O O O Q � �ow Oesign 1: Firsc-flush runoff volume detained for 6-12 hou . esign 2: Runoff volume produced by 1.0 inch, decained 24 houts. Design 3: As in Design 2, buc with shallov marsh in boicom scage. Design 4: Permanent pool equal co 0.5 inch storage per impervious acre. Desiyn 5: Permanen[ pool equal Lo 2.5 (Vr); uhere Vr=mean sGorm runoff. Lesign 6: Permanent pool equal to �.0 (Vr); approz. 2 veeks retention. �esign 7: Facility ezfilcrates firsc-flush; 0.5 inch runoff/imper. acre. �esign 8: Facility exfiltraces one inch runoff volume per imper. acre. Design 9: FaciliCy exfilcrates all runoff, up to the 2 year design s2orm. Oesign 30: 400 cu6it feet ve[ storage pet impervious acre. Design 11: 20 fooc vide turf strip. � Design 12: 100 fooi vide focested stzip, vich level spreader. Design 13: High slope swales, wieh no check dams. �esign 14: rqv gradient swales vith check dams. Chapter 5: Infiltrati Trenches 5 .3 Performance of partial exfiltration systems can be improved during smaller storms when perforated underdrains are not used. Instead, a perforated pipe can be inserted near the top of the trench (Figure 5 .2) . Runoff then wi11 not exit the trench until it rises to the level of the outlet pipe. Storms with less volume than the design storm may never fill the trench to this level, and will be subject to complete exfiltration. In either design, the passage of the inflow hydrograph through the trench can be modeled using the modified TR-20 procedure (Md WRA, 1983b) to determine the appropriate sizing of the trench. Due to storage/timing effects, partial exfiltration trenches will be smaller in size than fu11 exfiltration trenches serving the same site. Water Quality Exfiltration Systems The storage volume of a water quality trench is set to receive only the first flush of runoff volume during a storm. The first flush volume has been variously defined as; 1) one-half inch of runoff per impervious acre, 2) one-half inch runoff per acre, and 3) the volume of runoff produced by a one inch storm. The remaining runoff volume is not treated by the trench, and is conveyed to a conventional detention or retention facility downstream. While water quality exfiltration systems do not satisfy stormwater storage requirements, they may result in smaller, less costly facilities � downstream. The smaller size and area requirements of water � quality exfiltration systems allows considerable flexibility in their placement within a development site, an important factor for "tight" sites . Additionally, if for some reason, the water quality trench fails , stormwater may still adequately be controlled by a downstieam SWM facility. INFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN VARIATIONS Trench designs can be further distinguished as to whether they are located on the surface or below ground. Surface trenches accept diffuse runoff (sheet flow) directly from adjacent areas, after it has been filtered through a grass buffer. Underground trenches can accept more concentrated runoff (from pipes and storm drains) , but require the installation of special inlets to prevent coarse sediment and oil/grease from clogging the stone reservoir. Several examples of surface and underground trench designs are shown in � Figures 5.2 to 5 .9, and are described below. In most cases , these designs are adaptable for either full, partial or water quality exfiltration. Surface Trench Applications Surface. trenches are typically applied in residential areas , where smaller loads of sediment and oil can effectively be trapped by grass filter strips . Since the surface is exposed, these trenches have a slightly higher risk of clogging than underground trenches . However, if preventative measures are taken (e.g. , placing permeable filter fabric 6-12 inches below the surface of the trench to intercept sediment) , any surface clogging that occurs can be relieved without having to reconstruct the entire trench. Because of their accessibility, surface trenches are easier to maintain and inspect. �rl . I C�=9 n a � a o � '� a � n o � � �� , � 0 � � � PEABODY/SALEM STOP&SHOP Effects of Various Storms At the request of the Salem Conservallon Commission,VHB has evaluated the site of the proposed Stop&Shop on Howley Street in Peabody and Salem Massachusetts. The site was evaluated to deterntine the effects of the stormwater runoff on the site for both existing and proposed condiHons,for the 2,10,50,and 100 year storm events. The results of the evaluarions for each scenario are described below: • 2-Yeu Storm: -- Existing Conditions: The existing site has no slructural drainage system,thus,all runoff from the site exits via overland flow. The rate of runoff from the 2-year storm is estimated to be approximately 12 cubic feet per second(cfs). Based upon site topography,it appears that the majority of the stormwater runoff flows to the North River canal by means of seepage through the railroad ballast. The 2-year flood-does not overtop the bank and flood into the site. -- Proposed Conditions: During the 2-year storm for post-development condifions,the proposed drainage system will pass the anticipated runoff with no difficulty,since the system was designed for the 10- year storm event. The total site runoff rate has been calculated to be approximately 14 cfs. A stormwater recharge system was designed for the site to infiltrate apprmdmately one-half of the roof area for the 10-year storm event. InfiltraHng this amount of runoff will ensure that there will be as much,or more,groundwater recharge after development as there is under exisNng site condiHons. The rest of the site(not recharged)will drain to the North River canal with no back-up in the proposed closed drainage system. The runoff from the site will enter the North River canal prior the peak flow from the 5000- acre upstream North River canal watershed,meaning that the river will not be at it's peak flood elevation when the site is draining. Therefore, there will be no tailwater mndition at the stormwater outlet,and surcharging of the drainage system will not occur. It should be noted that over 95%of the storms experienced in the Boston area produce less rainfall than the 2-year storm event. • 10-Yeu Storm• -- Existing Conditions: As explained above,the runoff generated on the site flows overland off of the e�dsHng site. The 10-year runoff was calculated to be 19 cfs under the pre-developmenf mndiHons. The runoff from the 10-year storm also ponds along the railroad bed in the low areas unNl it seeps through the ballast or is infiltrated in the ground. sp/w/03834/various/storms.d oc B-I ' PEABODY/SALEM STOP&SHOP The 10-year ftood of the North River canal will cause some minor Floodin over the railroad g bed from the North River canal,into the site. — Proposed Conditions: The proposed drainage system was designed for the 10-year storm event,therefore,the system will pass the storm,but will be at irs maximum capacity. The total runoff rate from the site was calculated to be approximately 22 cfs,of which a maximum of 0.9 cfs from the new building roof will be recharged through the infiltration system. The majority of the flood waters overtopping the railroad bed from the North River canal will be stored in the front porHon of the site,bordering the railroad bed. The catch basins are below the 10-year tlood elevarion of the North River canal. Thus,there will be some minor ponding around the catch basins and in the azea behind the SMp&Shop. The runoff from the site will be discharged to the river prior to the river reaching it's flood elevarion,as previously menNoned. The only flooding to be experienced on the sire will be from the North River canal,and will not be from the storm runoff from the site. Therefore more storage volume will be available on site for overbank flooding from the North River canal than under existing conditions. • 50-Yeaz Storm: -- Existing Conditions: The 50-yeaz storm,under current site conditions,produces a rate of runoff of appro�dmately 26 cfs,which ponds along the railroad tracks. The 50-year Aood of the North River canal will overtop the railroad bed,and flood into the site. -- Proposed Conditions: Under the 50-year storm,the proposed site will create a total runoff of approximately 30 cfs. As the drainage system was designed for the 10-year storm,there will be some ponding on the site,specifically in the truck dock area in the rear of the building and the low spots around the catchbasins in the front pazking lot. Of the total runoff,appmximately 0.9 cfs will be infiltrated(from a portion of the roof�,and the remainder will flow to the North River canal. The infiltration system was designed to recharge the 10-year runoff from the front half of the mof,and thus any runoff in excess of this will overflow into the closed drainage system. The peak runoff generated by the site will have already been discharged to the North River canal prior to the river reaching it's peak flood elevarion. This flooding of the site will not negaNvely impact the surrounding area,as them will be a greater volume available for flood storage on the proposed site than there is currently. The flooding from the North River canal will cause ponding on the site,specifically in low areas in the front of the building and in the area to the rear of the store. sp/w/03834/various/storms.doc B-2 PEABODY/SALEM STOP&SHOP • 100-Yeaz Storm: — Existing Condihions: The 100-year storm,under existing site condiHons,develops a runoff rate of approximately 30 cfs. This rate of runoff would create flooding on the site,specifically along the railroad tracks and into Howley Street. The 100-year flood will raise the North River canal to an elevadon which will by overtop the railroad bed and Flood into the site. — Proposed Conditions: The post-development runoff from the 100-year storm was calculated to be 35 cfs. This will create ponding on the site,as the closed drainage system was only designed for the 10-year storm event. The water will pond over the catch basins located in low areas on the site unHl the drainage system can pass the enHre flow. T'he flooding of the site by the North River canal will not occur unNl the peak runoff from the site has been discharged. The flooding from the North River canal will pond over the entlre parking area in front of the store and over the area to the reaz of the store. As I described previously,there will be more flood storage on site after construcHon than there is currendy,so the impact will be negligible. Ii It should be noted that the proposed finished floor elevaHon of the store is 12.5 feet,which is , above the 100-year flood elevallon oE the North River canal. � sp/w/03834/various/storms.doc B-3 � .: ATTACHMENT C BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES i : ♦ , PEABODI'/SALEM STOP &SHOP BEST MANAGEMENT PR�,CI'ICES The proposed closed drainage system includes catch basins,all with sedimentaHon sumps and oil/grease hoods,and two(2)oil and grit sepazarors. In addirion,there will be a grassed drainage swale along the reaz of the property. The proper operation of these components will reduce the pollutant loads delivered from the site to the North River. The Stop &Shop Supermarket Company will ensure the proper operarion of these facilities through a program of non-structural Best Management Prectices(BMP),as outlined below: • Winter De-icing of Paved Areas: In order to provide for public safety during the winter season,the parking areas,walkways ' and service azeas will be sanded as necessary. To minimize the pollutant loading to the North River,only enough salt as is minimally necessary to maintain material handling chazacterisrics ("spreadability")will be used. A low-salt,sand-based mixture,containin a g maximum of 10 percent salt by volume,is proposed. Stop &Shop has incorporated this . policy at all of their stores. • Location of Snow Stockpiles: Snow plowed from the paved azea on site will be stockpiled in locations which are proposed to be grassed. By locating the snow stockpiles off of the aved areas,dischar e of the P g snowmelt(and sand plowed up with the snow) to the closed drainage system will be reduced. • Pavement Sweeping Program: Sediment loading to the catch basins will be reduced through a pavement sweeping program. Pavement sweeping has been shown to be an effective source reduction management measure by reducing the downstream loading of total suspended solids before they enter the closed drainage system. An eFfective sweeping program reduces contaminant loadin b rovidin control of articulate and adsorbed contaminants at the sour f re g Y p ce be o g P , these contaminants enter the stormwater runoff. Pavement sweeping at the proposed supermarket is proposed to be performed twice annually;once in the late fall prior to the sanding season,and once in the spring. If condirions warrant,the pavement will be swept addiHonally on an as needed basis. Pavement sweeping will be performed by a site maintenance contractor and all collected materials will be properly disposed of in accordance with all appiicable rules and � regulaHons. sp/w/03834/various/bmp.doc C-1 I � ' PEABODY/SALEM STOP&SHOP • Catch Basin Maintenance: As previously noted, the catch basins aze to be constructed with sedimentaHon sumps. The capacity of these sumps will be maintained by cleaning them twice annually;once in the fall and once in the spring to remove accumulated sediments. Catch basin deaning will be performed by a site maintenance contractor and all collected material will be disposed of in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. • Oil and Grit Sepazator Maintenance: Two(2)oil and grit sepazators will be installed as pazt of the closed drainage system in order ro intercept all oil and grit which makes its way into the system. The sepazators will be inspected twice annually,and cleaned out if required. At a minimum they will be pumped out once a year. The cleaning wiil be performed by a site maintenance contractor and all material removed will be disposed of in acrnrdance with all applicable rules and regulaHons. • Drainage Swale Maintenance: Routine inspections will be made on the drainage swale to ensure that sediments and other runoEf materials are not building up,and also to make sure that the grass is not being eroded by the flotv of runoff. If there is evidence of damage to the swale,repairs will be made immediately,or if sediment is building up,the swale will be cleaned by a site maintenance contractor. All material removed will be disposed of in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations. • Miscellaneous Site Maintenance: In addirion to the measures outlined above,several other measures to help minimize the potenHal environmental impacts to the North River. — Routinel ick u and remove litter from the arkin areas islands and erimeter YP P P g . � p landscape area. — Rourinely inspect all dumpster locaHons for spillage. sp/w/03834/various/bmp.doc G2 I , _;,; . ' EXHIBIT SOMMER'ENVIRONM�NTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. � ' 65 NE . "�. � . - � � � � WAKEFIELD,MASSACHUSETTS 01880 �� TELEPHONE(617)246-5360 � M E M O R A N D II M lD TO: Atty. John R. Serafini, Sr. FROM: Paul Sommer� SUBJECT:. Wetlands Soil Logs - Taken by hand auger June 22, 1995 DATE: August 7, 1995 Area I - Railroad Sidina Surface 0-2" Vegetative organic matter 2" - 6. 5" Saturated organic soils, demolition debris 6.5" - 12" Railroad track & balast Area II - Abuts Railroad Surface 0-2" Vegetative oFganic matter 2"-8 .5" Dark brown organic loam 8.5"-9.5" Gravel 9.5"-20" Brown sandy stony fill with debris NOTE: No mottling observed , No groundwater observed Area III - Burned Out Shed Surface 0-4. 5" Fill and demolition debris 4.5"-20" Silty clayey soils NOTE: No mottling or groundwater observed �� . � EXHIBIT SOMMER�ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. � 65 NE WAKEFIELD,MASSACHUSETTS 01880 � TELEPHONE(6(7) 246-5360 August 7, 1995 Atty. John Serafini, Sr. ' � ' Serafini, Serafini & Darling 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Stop & Shop, Howley St. , Peabody/8alem, MA Non-State Federal Jurisdictional Wetland Dear John: On August 1, 1995, Mr. Paul Sommer spoke to Mr. Michael Elliott of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Waltham. . As of march 1 , 1995 , the Corps of Engineers issued a Programmatic , General Permit ("PGP") (see attached) to apply in conjunction with MGL Ch. 131, s40 (the Wetlands Protection Act) . This PGP provides for three categories of work; Category I is a Non-Re- porting Condition; Category II requires reporting and screening by the Corps and Category III requires an individual permit for proposed work. One issue raised by Dr. Hugh Mulligan of Gulf of Maine Resources indicated that the railroad siding identified as sup- porting .wetlands vegetatioit` in Peabody, may be a federal juris- dictional wetland. Under the PGP Definitions of Category I (A) (a) , less than 5, 000 s. f. of wetland are to be filled. In fact, the area in questions is approximately 2 , 000 s. f. and as , such is Non-Reportable work and covered under the PGP. Therefore, Stop & Shop does need to file with the Corps for the proposed filling of the railroad siding. Please do not hesitate to call me regarding this matter, should you have any questions. - Very truly yours, SOMMER ENVIRONMENTAL S INC. � //�_ - kaul F. Sommer—� President PFS/dan serafini.mem ,. �z� � �� : ; . . . . , ,. , ,:::. . - � 4 �. � .. . .. ' . � � - . . . yyl'i . . . . . � . ' ' . . :.i. Permit No. : 1993-01040 Effective Date: March 1, 1995 Expiration Date: March 1, 2000 -A � Applicant: General Public in .N;assachusetts " DEPARTMENT. OF THE ARMY PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMZT � I COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS * The N.ew Enqland Division of ttfe U.S . 'Army Corps "of Engineers hereby issues a programmatic general perau.t that expedites review of minimal impact work in coastal and inland waters and wetlands within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Activities with minimal impacts, as specified by the terms and conditions of this general permit, are either non-reporting (provided required local and state permits and required state certifications are received) , or are to be scre :ned by the Corps and federal resource agencies for .applicability under the general permit. The Corps individual permit review process, and activities exempt from Corps jurisdiction, are not affected by this general permit. Activities covered: work and structures that are located in, or that affect, navigable waters of the United States (regulate�' by the Corps under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899) ; and the discharqe of dredged or _fill material into waters of the United States (regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Acti . Procedures A. State and Local F.�provals For projects authorized pursuant to this general permit, when the following state approvals are also required, they must be obtained in order for this general permit authorization to be valid (applicants are responsible for ensuring that all required state licenses and approvals have be=n applied for and obtained) : (a) Final Order of Condition5 "under the Wetlands Protection , Act (WPA) (MGL c. 131 Section 40) must be obtained for activities subject to jurisdiction as defined in 31,0 CMR 10 .02 . (b) Waterways license or permit under MGL c. 91, from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Division of Waterways must be obtained for activities subject to jurisdiction, as defined in 310 CMR 3.05 . (c) Water Quality Certification is required for work in Corps jurisdiction involving =_ discharge to waters of the U. S . Sonce projects require an individuai 401 water quality certification (WQC) issued by the Massachusetts DEP before work can proceed (see page 9 for 401 WQC requirements) . " (d) Coastal Zone Maaaqement: Any project that meets the terms and conditions -of Category T of this general permit (i .e. , non-reoorting) , has been determined to be consistent with the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management plan and does not require any additional coastal zone manaqement review. For work being screened under Category II of this general permit, the Corps will coordinate screening of any work in or affecting the coastal zone with the Office of Coastal Zone Management; for these projects applicants will be notified by the Corps if an individual CZM concurrence is required. H . Corps Authorization : Category I (Non-Reporting) = Work in Massachusetts that is subject to Corps jurisdiction (see `� Condition 2 on page 3) , that meets the definition of Category I on the Definition of Categories sheet (attached) , and that meets all of this _i=;� p. 1 1/1/95:�� 0 � "'� . . :,-.'G. S�`.''^ ' f. .., . , w:; +'aw..�tl?Si"' r., ;`A.:-=. • _ � _ . ' _ ' .. '`��ph�f3 �.. .. ..:.:� . . . . .:. .._. ' . .:�� . . � ' .,: . L . � i � . . . . . . . . . P.�Y:. ' . � ' . . . . . . � ��': ' � , . � 4,`r: , i F. permit's other conditions may proceed without application or notification to .�';;. the Corps provided the required fede=al, state and local authorizations are obtained. Note that the review thresholds under Cateaory I applv to sinqle, ==_�: complete proiects onlv (see �ondition 5) . Also, note that Category I does not apply to activities occurring in a conponent of; or within 0.25 mile of a component of, the National Wild and Scenic River System (see Condition 9, and ' page 8 for listed rivers in D.assachusetts) . Work that is not subject to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) , but is subject to Corps jurisdiction, is eligible for Corps authorization under this PGP; although an Order of Conditions is not required, the general permit review thresholds and requirements concerning WQC and CZM consistency apply. Such projects could include activities that are exempt from the WPA, and activities in federal wetlands (e .g. , isolated wetlands) , that are not covered under the WPA. Although Category I projects are non-reporting, the Corps reserves the right to require review for an individual permit if there are concerns for the aquatic environment or ai,y other factor of the public interest (see Condition 9 on Discretionary Authority) . C. Corps Authorization : Category IZ (Screening) For projects that do not meet the non-reporting thresholds apolicants are required to submit an application to the Corps for a case-by-czse determination of applicability under this general permit (Category IZ) . Cateqory II �ojects may not proceed until written notification is received . from the Corps, and the applicable certifications or waivers concerninq water quality and coastal zone mana4ement (CZM) are received bv the apolicant. ' Applicants will be notified by the Corps if an individual CZM consistency concurrence is reauired. t7o�e that Category II does not apply to activities occurring in a component of, or wi�hin 0 .25 mile of a comoonent of, the National Wild and Scenic River System (see Condition 9, and page 8 for listed rivers in Massachusetts) . For Category II projects, applicants filing a notice of intent (NOI) with their local Conservation Commission should submit a copy of their NOI materials to the Corps at the same time they apply to their Commission, along with additional information concerning the work within Corps jurisdiction (see below) . Category II applicants shall submit a copy of their application materials to the Historic Preservation Officer at the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MfiC) to be reviewed for the presence of historic/archaeological resources in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed work_ Applications to the Corps should include information to indicate that this has been done (applicant' s statement or a copy of their cover letter to MFiC) . The Corps will detarmine if Category II applications (1) require additional information (see below) ; (2) are appropriate foY- screening with the federal resource agencies (Environinental Protection Agency, U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service) ; (3) are ineligible under the terms and/or conditions of this general permit; or (4) will require individual permit review, irrespective of whether the terms and conditions of this general permit are met, based on concerns for the aquatic environment or any other factor of the public interest (see Condition 4 on Discretionary Authority) . Additional information required may include : (a) purpose of the project; = (b) 8 1/2" by 11" plan views of the entire property and project limits with ;�:. existing and proposed conditions (le4ible, reoroducible plans �-'- required) ; 4 .�, - p. 2 1/1/95 � .� ,= ,��.F �..�,-z:: .,�:.,. ._. . . . . . ..:.,- ...:: . . . .;:i". . _.: '.,, ,..:. -<:t;Y�. {c) wetland delineation for the site, information on the basis of the delineation, and calculations of waterway and wetland impact areas (see Conditioa 2 on page 3) ; (d) typical cross-section views of all wetland and waterway fill areas and wetland replication areas; (e) delineation of submerged aquatic vegetation, e.g. , eelgrass beds, in -��: tidal waters; �`� �_, (f) amount, type and source of fill material to be discharged z-nto waters and *� , wetlands, including the volume of fill below ordinary high water in , r inland waters, and below the high tide line in coastal waters; (g) mean low, mean high water and high tide elevations in navigable waters; (h) limits of any Federal navigation project in the vicinity and State Plane coordinates for the limiCs of the proposed work closest to the Federal project; (i) alternatives analyses submitted to the DEP for WQC review, and/o-r additional information compiled on alternatives; (j ) for dredging projects include the volume of material and area in square feet to be dredged below mean high water, existing and proposed water e of dred in e ui ment to be used, nature of material (e .g. ierths, typ s S S t silty sand) , any existin� sediment grain size and bulk sediment chemistry data for the proposed or any nearby projects, information on the location and nature of municipal or irdustrial discharges and occurrence of any contaminant spills in or near the project area, location of the disposal site (include locus sheet) . Additional information may be requested by the Coros; dredging apolicants may be required to conduct a shellfish survey, and sediment testing, including physical, cheinical and biological testing. D . Corps Authorization : Category III (Individual Permit) ttached Definition of Categories is in Cate or IZI on the a . Work that 9 Y sheet, or that does not meet the 'terms and conditions of this general pernut, will require an application for an individual permit from the Corps of Engineers (see 33 CFR Part 325 . 1) . The screening procedures outlined above will only serve to delay project review in such cases . The appropriate � application materials (including either the NOI joint application form or the Ccrps application form) should be submitted by the applicant at the earliest possible date; general information and application forms can be obtained at ( 617 ) 647-8338 . Individual water quality certification and coastal zone management consistency concurrence will be required. E . Proqrammatic General Permit Conditions : The following conditions apply to activities authorized undez the Ps.ogiammatic General � o�.^si*.. .iacludinc �-.'.7- �'�.'."'c"�"' ` '"'=^�-"^Pc�`ing) -and Category IZ (screening) activities: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Other Per.nits. Authorization under this general permi.t does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, ot local authorizations required by law. � 2, licabilitv of this eneral oermit sFall be evaluated with reference to Federal iurisdictional boundaties. P.pplicants aie responsible for ensuting that the boundaties used satisfy the fedetal ctitetia defined at 33 CFR 328-329. 3. Minimal Effects. Projects authorized by this qeneral permit shall have minimal ;N� individual and cumulative advecse environmental impacts as detecmined by the Corps. � 1/1/95,+�n.�`'�`.. P 3 :;� _. _ .... . , _ . .. . . �:�'�—� � P:} �'.-VSl I —KST+F. <...:._� _;", ' � . .:. . . t� �:: . ._x. Y�, N'x . . � � . � '_�jl<i� . . � . . . , r`4 . ��r _..,�}a.,. 9. Discretionary Authozity. Notwithstanding compliance with the tezms and conditions of z this permit, the Corps of Engineers zetains discretionary authority to require review for�; �., an individual permit based on concerns for the aquatic envi=onment or fot any other. facto=_ � of the public interest. This authosity is invoked on a case-by-case basis �wheneve= the r Corps determines that Ehe potential con3equences of the proposal warrant individual =eview based on the concerns stated above. This authority may be invoked for projects with ki cumulative environmental impacts that are more than minimal, or if there is a special ' ",�'` resource or concern associated with a particulaz ptoject, that is _not alneady covered by ""' the remaining conditions of the PGP, that warrants gteatet =eview. - . � . �- Whenever the Corps noti£ies an applicant that an individual permit map be tequired, - _ � authorization under this general permit is voided, and no work may be� conducted until- the individual Cotps permit is obtained, or until the Corps notifies the applicant that � - further zeview has demonstrated that the work may pzoceed under this general permi.t. --� 5. Single and Complete Projects. This general permit shall not be used for piecemeal : work and shall be applied to single and complete projects. All components of a single project shall be tteated togethez as constitutinq one single and complete pzoject. A11 planned phases of multi-phased projects shall be treated Eogether as constitLting one single and complete project. This general peimit shall not be used for any activity that is part of an oveiall project for which an individual permit is requized. NATIONAL CONCERNS: - - 6. Historic Properties. Any act�:vity authorized by this geneial permit shall comply with Section 106 of the National HistoZic Pzeservation Act. Information on -the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the Massachusetts Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Places. If the permittee, during constzuction of wozk authorized herein, encounters a pzeviously unidenti£ied archaeological or othei cultural resource within the area subject to Department of the Army jurisdiction that might be eligible foz listing in the National Reqister of Historic Places, he/she shall immediately notify the Division Engineer. 7. National Lands. Activities authotized by this general permit shall not impinge upon - _ the value of any National Wildlife Aefuge, National Forest, National Marine Sanctuary (e.g. Stellwagen Bank) or any area administezed by the National Park Service (e.g. Cape Cod National Seashore) . - 8. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized undez this general permit which may affect a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified undet the Federal Endanqeied Species Act (ESA) ; o= which is likely to destroy ' ar adversely modify the critical habitat of such species; or which would zesult in a "take" of any threatened or endangered species of fish or wildlife, or which would zesult in any other violation of Section 9 of the ESA protectin� threatened oi endangered species of plants. Applicants shall notify the Corps if any listed species or �critical habitat is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work until notified-by the distritt engineer that the requirements of the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied and that , the activity is authorized. In£ormation on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Matine Fisheries Service (addresses attached, page 8) . 9. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity is authorized under this genezal permit that occurs in a component of, oz within 0.25 mile of a component of, the National. Wild and Scenic Aivez System, including rivers officially designated by Congress as study rive=s for possible inclusion in the system, while such rivers are in an-official study status. :.- Current rivets that this applies to in Massachusetts are listed on page 8. 10. Federal Naviqation Project. Any structute or wosk that extends closez to the ' -. hozizontal limits of any Co=ps' navigation ptoject than a distance of three times the r5 '. pzoject's authorized depth (see attached map fot locations of these projects) shall be b c : P• 4 1/1/95 �X ��: �d.. �<tt- .^rs�-a�'��$a«SrvS'e _ `E^ '^'...v - �.a: ' r :� , � . ' � . ' � � ` . }. - ' � - � � x" , . . .. . .. . . ��'1 - . . . _ . . . . . . , �,�; subject to removal at�the owner's�expense priot� to any future Corps' dredqing oi the `" performance of periodic hyd=og=aphic surveys. . `� il. Fede=al Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume ;; any liability Eoz the following: (a) damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a`.'� result of other permitted �or unpe=mitted aetivities or ftom natural causes; (b) damages to��'s�,;;,`_ the permitted project or uses theteof as �a zesult of current or futu=e activities �� .;,��:: undertaken.by or on behalf of the..United States in the public interest; '(e) damages to ,.i�n persons, property, or to other permitted or unpeimitted activities or structu=es caused by the activity authorized by this petmit; (d) design or construction deficiencies associated with the perntitted work; (e) �damage claims associated with any future modification, . suspension, or tevocation of this permit. � 12. Naviqation. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the existence or use of the activity authorized herein, and no attempt shall be made by the permittee to ptevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or . adjacent to the activity authorized herein. � MINIMIZATION OF ENVZRONMENTAL IMPACTS: - . 13. Minimization. Discharges of dtedged or fill material into waters of the United States shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. . 14. Work in Wetlands. Heavy equipment ��+orking in wetlands shall be avoided if possible, and if required shall be placed on mats to minimize soil and vegetation disturbance. Disturbed areas in �.retlands shall be restoced �to preconst=uction contours upon completion . of the work. In many cases the mats are considered a discharge of fill material and must be included in the quantification of impact atea, and authorized by this general permit. 15. Temporary Fill. Temporary fill in waters and wetlands authorized by this general - permit (e.g. access coads, cofferdams) shall be properly stabilized .dutinq use .to prevent erosion. Temporary fill in wetlands shall be placed on qeotextile fabric laid on existing wetland grade.� Temporary fills shall be' disnosed of at an upland site, suitably contained to prevent erosion and transport to a waterway or wetland. Temporary fill areas shall be restored to their oiiginal contours. -. 16. _Sedimentation and Erosion Control. Adequate sedimentation and erosion conttol management measures, practices and devices, such as phased construction, vegetated filter � st=ips, geotextile silt fences or other devices, shall be installed and p=operly � maintained to zeduce erosion and retain sediment on-site during and after construction. They shall be capable of preventinq erosion, of collecting sediment, suspended and floating materials, and of filterinq fine sediment. These devices shall be removed upon completion of work and the disturbed ateas shall be stabilized. The sediment collected by these devicas shall be temoved �and placed at an upland location, in a mannez that will prevent its later erosion into a waterway or wetland. All exposed soil and other fills - shall be permanently stabilized at the earliest ptacticable date. 17. Watetway Ciossinqs. (a) All temporary and permanent crossings of waterbodies shall �. be suitably culverted, btidged, or otherwise designed to withstand and to prevent the � restriction of high flows, and so as not to obsttuct the movement of aquatic life �- indigenous to the waterbody beyond the actual duration of constzuction. (b) No open trench excavation shall be allowed in flowinq waters. (cj Tempozary bridges, culverts, or coffezdams sha11 be used fot equipment access across strear.ts (note: areas of fill and/ot cofferdams must be included in total waterway/wetlands inpacts to determine applicability - of this qeneral permit) . (d) For projects that otherwise meet the tenns of Category I, ;;'; instream constzuction work shall be conducted during the low flow period July 15 - October .;;-:� 1 in any year; projects that are not to be conducted duzing that time period are _: :'�� p, 5 1/1/95 ,- .. .., .. �„;n;�3<°J 4 . "' � _ � f r a • i. . '� ` -.-:. S."' ineliqible for Cateqory •I and shall be sczeened pursuant to Category Ii, regardless of, the'�z` watezway and wetland fill and/ot impact azea. � . � 18. Discharge of Pollutants. All activities involving any discharge of pollutants into ��:��.s:.; waters of the United States authorized undez �this genezal permit shall be consistent with� �� applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations, standards of pezformance, ptohibitions, and pretteatment standards and manag�ment practices established putsuant to the Clean Watez Act (33 U.S.C. 12511 , and applicable sta*.e and local laas. If applicable water quality standards, limitations, etc., are revised or modified duting the term of � this permit, the authorized wotk shall be modified to conform with these standards within �� 6 months of the effective date o£ such tevision or mod�fication, or within a longer period of time deemed reasonable by the Division Engineer in consultation with the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Proteetion Agency. Applicants may presume that State water quality standazds are met with issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification. 19. Spawning P.reas. Discharges in fish and shellfish spawning or nursery areas duzing spawning seasons shall be avoided, and impacts to these areas shall be avoided or - minimized to the maximum exten-t practicable duzing all times of year. 20. Stozage of Seasonal Structures. Coastal structures such as piez sections, floats, etc. , that are rer,oved from the waterway for a �portion of the year shall �be stozed in an upland location, located above mean high Water and not in salt marsh. � 21. Environmental Values. The permittee shall make every reasonable effort to carry out , the construction or operation of the work authorized herein in a manner so as to maintain as much as is practicable, �and to minimize any adverse � imoacts on, existing fish, wildlife, and natuzal environmental values. PROCEDURAL �ONDITIONS: 22. Inspections. The permittee shall permit the Division Engineei or his authorized representative (s) to make petiodic inspecrions at any time deemed necessary in � ordez to ensuze that the work is being pezformed in accordance with the terms and conditions of .thi� permit. The Division £ngineer may also require post-construction - engineering drawings foz completed work, and post-dzedging survey diawings for any dredging work. � � 23. Maintenance. The permittee shall maintain the wozk or structures authorized herein in good �condition, including maintenance to �ensure public safety. Dredging projects: note that this does not include maintenance of dzedging projects. Maintenance dredging is . subject to the review thresholds on page 10, and/or any conditions included in a written . Corps authorization. 24. Property Rights. This permit does not convey any pzoperty rights, either in real estate or satetial, oz any exclusive privileges, nor does it authozize any injury to property or invasion of rights oz any infringement of Federal, State, or��local laws or regulations. 25. Modification, Suspension and Revocation. This permit may be either modified, , :� suspended, oz zevoked in whole or in part putsuant to the policies and pzocedures of 33 � C£R 325.7; and any such action shall not be the basis for any claim foZ damages against the United States. 26. Restoration. The petmittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of � -. authorization under this permit, shall restore the wetland or waterway to its former � conditions, without expense to the United States and as directed by the Sectetary of . the Army or his authorized representative. If the petmittee fails to comply with such a �',. ' '�-::' P. 6 1/1/95 ., �4_ .'.. . � ' � 4%. , ' `^. Y.St "' . . . ' *zr,�g{:�t 1 1�2 .' '`"� y;'. -'wG��5 3'^ {i f . . . _ .. .�T�, . � . � .. - � '- ' . � . . � , . ' . . . -'_C � , . .. . +�".�.e� ' � - .. . . , _� �{. directive, the See=etary or his desiqnee may restore the wetland or waterway to its foaner'. condition, by contract or othenaise, and recover the wst �from th� permittee. - . _ , �i;�;' 27. Special Conditions. The Corps may impose other special wnditions on a project �- authorized pursuant to this qeneral permiL that� are� detetmined necessary to minimize - adverse environmental effects or based on any othe= factor of .the public interest. - : - Failure to comply with all eonditions of the authorization, includinq special conditions,.`';�� will constitute a permi.t violation and may subject the permittee to czi.minal,.- dvil, or � �� administrative penalties, or restoration. � ;;;�= 28. False or Incomplete Znfozmation. If the Corps makes a determination reqarding the _- eligibility of a project under this pezmit, and subsequently discovers that it has relied � � , - on false, incomplete or inaccurate information provided by the permittee, � the permit shall _ not be valid and the Government may institute �appropriate legal proceedinqs. . �. . 29. Abandonment. If the permittee decides to abandon the activity authorized undez this geneial petmit, unless such abandonment is merely the ttansfer of property�to a third party, he/she must restote the area to the satisfaction of the Division Engineer. 30. Enforcement cases. This qeneral perm.it _does not apnly to any existing oi ptoposed � activity in Corps jurisdiction associated with an on-go�_ng Corps of Engineers enforcement � action, until such time as the enforcement action is resolved or the Corps determines that the activity may pcoceed independently without compromising the enforcement action. DURATION OF AUTHORIZATZON/GRANDFATHERING: 31. Duration of Authorization. Accivities authotized undei �this general permit that have been commenced (i.e. , are under construction) or ate under contract to commence in - reliance upon this authorization will remain authorized pzovided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the qenezal permit's expiration, modification, or revocation, unless discretionaty authority has been e�:ercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or zevoke the authocization in accordance with 33 CFR 325.2 (e) (2) . Activities completed under the authotization �of the general permit that �was in effect at the time the � activity was completed will continue to be authorized by the general permit. 32. Previously Authotized Activities. (a) Activities which have commenced, i.e. are under consttuction oi ate under contract to commence, prior to the issuance date of this genetal permit, in reliance upon the terms and conditions of the non-reportinq categoiy of the previous Massachusetts PGP, shall remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of issuance of this qenezal permit, unless discretionaty . authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the � I authorization in accozdance with Condition 4. The applicant must be able to document to the Cocps ' satisfaction that the project was undet construction ot contract by the approptiate date. (b) Projects that have received wtitten verification or approval from the Corps, based on applications made to the Corps prior to issuance of this qenezal - pecmit, for the previous Massachusetts PGP, Nationwide permits, regional general permits, or letters of permission shall remain authorized as .specified in each authorization. (c) Activities authorized pursuant to 33 CFR Pait 330.3 (activities occutring befote cettain dates) are not affected by this general petmit. . � . �, J�. � z8 99 `-. ��: C DI ICT ENG EER DATE -� `�. �;. �;'� p � 1/1/95� �..:� . . . {'�'-�`.�� _'" v �"''��'�e��,}.� g`�}S��' s :X" .. . � -� . . . . , � . � :..f .; Contaets for Progra�atic General Permit: � . .. - . " . January 1, 1995 -;.'�� U.S. Acnty Corps of Engineers . Coastal Zone Management _ � . . � s��=�;�` Regulatory Division 100 Cambiidqe Street 2Qth Floor � 929 Trapelo Road Boston, Massachusetts 02202 � Waltham, Massachusetts 02259-9199 617-727-9530 } 617-697-8335 -�; 800-343-9789 (ME, VT, NH, RI, CT) ti; 600-362-4367 (Massachusetts) ;�.: Massachusetts Historical Coa¢nission National Park Service The Massachusetts Archives Bldg. North Atlantic Region - 220 Morzissey Soulevard 15 State Street - .. Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Boston, Massaehusetts 02109-3572 . 617-727-8970 . - Federal Endangered Speciea: � U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fi:sheries Service � 22 Bridge Street Unit #1 One Blackbuzn D�ive � Concotd, New Hampshire 03301-4901 Gloucester, Massachusetts 01930-2298 603-225-1911 508-281-9300 Massachusetts . Department o£ Environmental Proteetion (DEP) : DEP Division oE Wetlands and Waterways � . � One Winter Street � Boston, Massachusetts 02108 617-292-5695 Reqioaal DEP O£fices: � _ � ' DEP-Western Region � DEP-Southeast Region Wetlands Protection Progtam � Wetlands Protection Program . � � 436 Dxight Streat . 20 Ri.verside Drive, Route 105 Springfield, Massachusetts 01103 - Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347 413-784-1100 SC8-946-2800 DEP-Central Region � . DEP-Northeast Region Wetlands Protection Proqram - . Wetlands Protection Piogram 75 Grove Street � 10 Commerce Way Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 Wobuin, Massachusetts 01801 508-792-7650 617-932-7600 National Aild aad Scenic Rivers 3ystem segments and study segments for , I Massachusetts as of June 2, 1992, include: Weat Braach o£ the Farmington River from Hayden Pond in Otis downstream to the confluence With Thorp Brook in Sandisfield; sudbury/AssabetJConcord Rivera as Eollows: the Sudbury from the Danforth Street bridge in Framinqham downstream to the confluence with the Assabet, the Assabet from 1000 feet below the Damon Mill Dam downst=eam to the con£luence with the Sudbuzy, and the Concord from the confluence of the Sudbury and Assabet downstream to the Route 3 bzidge in Billerica; and the A�at£ield River as follows: East B=anch from the Cummington/Windsor, MA, town line downst=eam to 0.8 mile upstream of the conEluence with Holly Brook, the Middle Branch froin the Peru/Worthington, MA, town line downstream to the confluence with - Kinne Biook, and 0.4 mile of the Glendale Brook _tributary from Cla=k Wright Road bridge to the confluence with the Middle Branch, and the West Branch fzom the railroad bridge 2000 feet downstream of Becket Village in Becket, MA, downstream to the Chester/Huntington, MA, - town line. Projects located in these segmenta, or withia 0.25 .mile up- or .: dawa-atream, or 0 .25 mile npatream on any tributary, are escluded from the �,. � YGP. �;;�_',;_ - p. 8 January 1, 1995 - �C�. - ` `_i�.. . � � . �""s"A�}',�.+.`�� a- r.R�h�'�.--.�'n3`+� t+r'+.a y'3f`�'-7 �t�s ':::r�.+�« �:t' � � .: �'Ty„' ,:, �..,.. - � - . .•.-, ,. ., .,.- . ;.� . . . . .._ ,. � '- . . �w:,.. _.. . ..:: . ... , ... . � ..:: �-:? .. 401 Rater � ualit Certification. Januar 4 Y y 1, 1995 _ ' � . ' '�"Ia . For work in Corps jurisdiction involving a discharge to waters of the "��. U.S. , an individual 401 water .quality certification (WQC) must be obtained ' from the Massachusetts DEP before work can proceed pursuant to this general ', permit for the following circumstances (pursuant to MGL c. 21 Sections 26 - �? ; 53 and regulations at 314 CMR 9.00, as supplemented by the Interim Guidance `;w '', effective 10/1/92) , until repTaced by revised regulations in early 1995: "`��< 1. proposed work that is not subject to the WPA (310 CMEt 10.00) but does require a 901 Water Quality Certification and proposes the loss of bordering vegetated wetlands, land under water, or federal non-state wetland (e. g. ; WPA exemptions) ; 2 . any project intended to create a real estate subdivision for which a Notice of Intent is submitted on or after October 1, 1992; 3 . any project which will result in the loss of more than 5, 000 square feet of bordering ve�etated wetlands or land under water; 4 . proposed work in Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs) as designated in 319 CMR 4 . 00; 5 . proposed work in coastal areas which will result i:. the loss of any amount of salt marsh; 6 , projects involving dredging mor2 than 100 cubic yards in navigable i waters . F.; ;_� ;>:� p. 9 January 1, 1995 tr�?; . ' . • _,�.a��.. DEFIN.L'1'lutv ur� �.:t��r�:�vn��.� _. ........... ...................._.....__. ......... ........_. ..........,.................................................._..._.............._...........__..;.;.............................................................................. ......_..... ; _.................................._.........:......_..........: . . . . . � ;CATEGORY I ;;CATEGORY II ;;INDIVIDUAL PERMIT :................................................................................................. , ..................................................................................................... ... ;; . A,INLAND....WATERS...AND...W ETLANDS...IWATERS...OF....U.S.....I�.I....)...�.�..............................................................................................�:............................................................................................... �: a NEINFILL/EXCAVATION......ILess_.than._S,OOO,.s.l...inland_waterway.__._F.�5,000._s,f._to. 1__acre..inland...y+aterway,.,.._;.jGreater fhan 1 acre_Iniand, watetway,_,._ �..�............................ DISCHARGES:... �andlor wetland fll and secondary ... ., ,'and/or.welland Iiil and..seconda _�or.wedand,.fill and.seconda �' impacts.(eg,,areas dralned,.flooded or.,1lmpacls (ep_,..areas drained, flooded or ,.Impads..�e..gx areas drafned,.,flooded.,or i ��cleared) Im act area includes all cleared�..lmpact area.includes.all !�cleared) . Impact area Includes.all .. . _ . P temporary..and permanent lill.,and .. .. �temporary and...permanent_fli_and .... .. ;:lemporary and...permanenl,_fll,_and_,,,......, _.......... . _ ............ _....... .. 9 excavation,.dischar es..... . ... . ...... _„excayation discharges :�excayatlon._discharges ..,,. , _ _.. _.... This catepory excludes dams...dikes, , Any dam dike waler diversion or . water drversions water.withdrawals ,. ._water...withdrawal pro�ect.. EIS required 6y the Corps.... .. _...... _ _ __. ..... .. In-stream work limited to July., 1.5 _.Time ol year reslriction to be. __. _.._... . _._..._ _.. ......._ _ . . .. Oct. t ,,...._.determined case-by-case . ....... i..... . . . .... _ _. . _ (b).BANK.STABILIZATION, ._. Inland bank.stabilization,less than,,. . Inland bank.stabilizaUon grealer than _ _ _ . ... PROJECTS: . 500 ft lenyth and less than 1.c.y. fill. 500 ft .length.and/or greater than „_... per ,linear foot.below ordinary hlgh, 1 .c y hll per, linear fool or any.,. �„_ _,,. P _........... water rovided no wetland 61L, �_amount with,fdl in weUands ,,...,, _ ...__. _.. .. ;� , .... .. .......................... . ... . b (c) RFPAIR AND MAINTENANCE Repau/maintenance ol extshn� �.,. �i Replacement of non-serviceable hll Replacement ol..non-serviceable fill _... . � OF,AUTHORIZEDFILL6:. , curr.ently sen!iceable authonzeG hlls �,tor..repaidmaintenance .ol .serwceable ..�.or repairlmaintenance ol seryiceable , o with„no exPansion or,change In use . ,�fll,,.with expansion ol any amount up to ,fill, preater,.than.. 1 acre:.,,_._ .. .... .. „ ___..... . _ _ _ , ' :.1_�cre. or with change in use.......... ,...._ _... . .. . .......... ........ _.__....... .. . .._...... _............ _.._._..._ . _ _ . _ . . B TIDAL WATERS ,AND NAVIGABLE. WATERS (2) , „ , .. .................. .. ......... (a) FILL . Fills authoriz��d_by.Ch .91 amnesty �_Up l0 1 acre waterway lill andlor ,Greater. than 1 acrq.,waterway_(ill_.,._..,._ _.. program (e.g:,.,seawalls,.. bulkheads) ,secondary waterway.and wetland :and%o� secondary.watenvay.._or. ..,_ - - •�Im ac{s e areas dramed or wetland im acts e areas drained ot _ ..... ;;.. .P 1 9 P..... .I.:�:.t No,.provisions for new_fill m Cat I. . ��ilooded)... Fill.includes,temporary,and., ,.�flooded) _Fill.includes temporary.and.._. ,_permanent, waterway,. fill _. .,_._... ,_permanent_._waterway fill _._.... _... _..._. _ :: . ..... . .. . . _ .. .... ... . .......... _. ........ _. Temporary sall marsh_ fill or excayation,Temporary.salt.._marsh._fll, or._excavatio __......... . .............. _ _... __. _._.... ,, ... � discharges up to 1 acre disc .arges �rea er., an .._.acre , ............................... .................. � - ' No provisions for permanent sall „Permanent salt,matsh.,flll,_any,.amount. ,� _....... __ _ � _ .. .......__.. __ , ; marsh fill in PGP. . ....... .. ......... ...... .. _. ........ _....... _ N _..... . ,,EIS required_by.the.Cor�....... . ........ . ... � _ �., .... .. _._ _ __..... __ Ni . .. .. . .. __., . . . , . . � ...... .. .......... .. . ..... ........... ...... .............. �'' ��Replacement of any.non serylceable _. .�!Replacement,of non-servlcea.b.le. ' � (b) REPAIR.AND MAINTENANCEiRepalr/maintenance ol exlstlnc�,. .. , ;,,,. ............... "' WORK: _currently seryiceable, authorized strudure or .fill,....or repairlmaintenance��structure,,.or fill, of,_tepalf%mafntenanc ... . .. .. . ... .................. 'atructures..and._lilis,..includfng._amnesty-�.�of._a._serylceable..structure...or...fill..with .,�.al serviceable etructure or;fll,,,with . ... ........ ... .... ... ... ..... . .. �approyed.flls,.wlth no. expansion._or._,,. (,expanslon or.chan.ge..in use...(fll.limits 1.,�fill replacement or expansion„greater,,;,,, , . ;change In use. i�acre for re lacemAot and/or ex ansion).'than 1 acre. ;=;`� , , , a:,..�; � � . , - ' � r ` t� +' '1 � ' � . ��' �i4t^1'lc�� f. ��lt+'... r''}o;Nq�y ,.�, � . � } /� e 41Th� \S::srvi4. .. . . ' . � � . . . � �kw'1k(s4 1 'M ... , . . .. . , _ _ iCATEGORY I ;;CATEGORY II ;:INDIVIDUAL PERMIT • � _..... ....................... , ........ _.................._ .........;............................. .. ....... :i.................. ............................................................_..........:;.................................................. . �c DREDGING:..............._,....,,,,.........:.,.;Malntenance._dredping, less_than 1,000 :�Malntenance dredging..greater_than_.,_......_.;.:_Maintenance dredging...(any„amount).iq,.... , �.... ......... . �...................... ..... .. � cX with upland �sposal proylded. .... ,;.1,oeo c,y. or. that does not..meet the �.or aftecdng._a special.aquatic.site (3)...,. proper siltation cl�ntrols are ysed ..,_ .., terms In Cat..,l upland disposal_or .or vnth open_water disposal,. „_,,,., �limited to dredgln�.and.disposal ��beach nounshmenl re uired and no , 9 operations conducted belween Nov 1 ...�.Impacts to special aquaNc s�tes (3j . . _. . , . , .. , „ _,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, .., .. .... and Jan. _15; with no impact to speclal ,'9ee (a) above for limilalions on lili for . ,. .. . ............. _ _. _ _ ,.... . :.. . . . . ...... . _ _.. __. aquatic .sltes (3): I beach nourlshmenl _......_. . . ....._.. _..... ._.... ...... ....... ... ........... . ._ ......,..... ........._..__ ................. .,,. ............. .... ... . . ..... . ... . . ,. ..... ... ..... .. ...._ i _..... ..... . .... .... .. ...................................... ........ ...... . . _ __. _ _...... __ New dredaing,up l0 10,000 c.y.;.upland ,New„dredgin�...greater than_,10,OOO.c.y,. � __ . _._..... . ...__._.__ __. ... _..__ disposal or.beach nourishment requued or.o( any amount m or atfecting a i,i^ _. _ . . . ,, , „See,,..(a)..above lor limitations.on_fill (or .speaal._aquatic slte (3),,_or with..open.... , ',� _.... _. ___ _ _ 7 �each nourishment __ �water disposal.... .... ..... .. . .... _ ,..... _ _._ __.. � _.. _ ._ ......._..... __. :. ...... .. .. .... .... .. ....... . ,; _ _,... . _. . .. ... ........ ............................ . (d) MOORINGS Prrvate non commerc�al, non rental Moonn�s thal do not meet the terms in Moorings withiq..the horizontat limits: _.... . �. 9 single.,boat moorin s not..associated,wdh Cal I and moonn s that,meet.the or,with moored vessels.that extend. .. _ , any._boating lacihty (4) prowded not terms o( Cat 1. that are located wilhin within_the limits of Corps.Federal,. _. .:_. -. located in Federal_Navigation Pro�ect. ,a Federal anchorage . .,,. Nav��atmn._profect, exce.pt those.Jn ;R _.. , " ,.` Federal anchorages under Cat...11........._ 7{ � __ . , . . .. _.. _ .......................... ..... ......... ......... _. .. . .. (e� PIIESUPPORTED.. __. Pnvate, bottom-anchored,.11oats up.to Private piers.and Iloals that do not Any,_structure, ,pler..or.,floa(„that,,,,,,,,,,,,, STRUCTURES AND FLOATS:.. 400 s f, m s¢e .and meet.the terms m Cat L . extends or with docked o� moored - vessels that extend, withfn. the Pnvate...Pile supported piers lor ..Y . ,, . .P �. . 9 .. . . .., P .,� _... .. _. ..... ,navigahonal...access to ihe.waterwa .. Ex anslons to existin boaUn horizontal.,limits.of a.Cot s Federal... u to 1 000 s f in s¢e wdh atlached IaciliUes (4) ,._, Navigation ProJect p ........................ (loats up to 200 s f (total) , ...:......... .. 'f;� ... Structures Includm .lers and tloats i . .. 9 ... . . . _ _ „Provided . ,.associated with a new of...Ptevlously � i �" _ . _ . , _.... . . floats..are supPorted.oH,)he subsjrale.., _ unaulhonzed.,boating.,faclldy f 4�,... ,,.,._., ; _ ,f� at low_tide�. _... __ . ... sttuctures and moored.vessels are _ _. ` -�'` _ _. . ............. not osdioned over ve etated �' _ . .......... ._ __. .. . _ ..... . .: .. . .P.. 9.. . .. _._ ,:....._. _ _ .. _ . .. . ...... . . ._..... ..... ......... shallows..(5) or salt..marsh __ ...... _ _ ._ _,. - Ch., 91...license,.has. been. issued (for _ _ .... .. . ... pde-supported st�uctures only� . ., . �: _.. not,associated_.with a.,boaUng, faciliry : ` _ .. . ..... .. ........... _ . . 191�.. ........ . ,.... .... . . ... . � _ _ .. _ ..................... not.located wdlSln..3..times the deplh . ............ ............... of a CorPs Federal NavigaUon ProJecl _... . ...... .......... ........._, �i , �. �� _ � ;P(ers and. siructures Ilcensed..by Ch. 91 .. _ . _ __.... . , .__ . .. . „ �.. . ... ..................... • ;through the amnesty program. ��'�4'� . . . _e.jl:� ': ��ti'`� . �. . . ' }v,�� . .. . , ?�A� . I!��) � ------- - - - : ; CATEGORY I �iCATEGORY II ;;INDIVIDUAL PERMIT • • _... ;.�............................_...__........._................_ ....................;.,.............................................................................................. �' I�MISCELI.ANEOUS;..._...................:.Temporary_._buoys,,.._markers.,__Iloats,.,,.,.,,,.;.;Structures..or...work„i.n..or.,allec(in,g_,.,..., i EIS_regulred,by.the..Corps,,,.............,_:.,,.,.,_. : ( and. slmllar sirudures lor recreatlonal 'itidal.and navigable waters that.are , ...,....,..,_. ,,, „ ,...,., , _..... .; s St uctu es o work within the _. use_durinp.specllic eyenls, provided . .;:not_defined under any of the heading �...,..r r r ... .. , ederal � o limited horizontal Iimits of Cor F __.... . .._. they._are remoyed withln 30 days after.��ilsted above ,Includes� but is..n..t �........ ......... .... ..__...._,,,__..ps,,,,..,,,,,. ._ ..,,.,.,,,, _. ;the..use.has been discontinued ....,,,,. ;,;to,.. utility lines _aerfal )ransmission ,navigation proJects, or. with docked •or,. Ilnes plpelines outtalls boat ramps,.....�;moored vessels that extend, withtn . _..... PP ... _ ........... . ..._....... Coast..Guard a roved alds to bridges, .etc :;ihose limits Does._not Include u,ility ;,.. 1 ' lines a nal an _ _...... navigation ._....... .... ...sin9s... t _........ ... _.... ��. .... ........ . e d subsuAace cros _ .....__ .....__.... _.. . �:Shellfish..aquacWture (acilit�e:.; refer. fall.into Cat II. _._..._..___.. ...... ^.,' _.._ _ '. Oil..,spill clean-up temporary structures , to limitalions of Corps Aquaculture `: _..... .. __ ...... __.__. _..... ... . ... .. , i and lill. Letter ol Permission dated Sep. 1 : _ . . ......... __. _..... .. . ............. .. _. __. ... ; 1991 for guidelines.. ;. _ _ _. _..._ . . _ _......... . . .._. _ .... ,. Flsh and wildl.'e harvesdng structures _ _. ... ._ ,, ........... __. . _. _ „ .... _ _ ... . _ _ ; and (iIL i _ ..... . . ............ _.. . . ....._... _...... ._ __...... ._..... . .... .._ ; __ ... _.... _ . _ _ . _ ... Saenhfic measur ment devices and ' _ . .. _ . ._ .. __..... , _.... . �: .. .. _ , ._ survey. act�vities, such as exploralory _ _ , , _.___ _ _...._ _. . _.. , dnlling._suneying and..sampl�ng.:. ,. _..._ _ __ . � aclivities. Does not include oil and gas . _.._ _. _..... _ _.._ r ; exploralion and fill lor roads or _ _ .._ _. _ .. _ .. . . ... N construction pads _.... __._._. ............... . .:. ....... ........__ .. .............. . __. .. _ __. . .. . . . . .. ...... . ..._._ . .......... ..... . .... .. ....... Footnotes... ....... .. __ _._ __ _ 1 Waters o( ihe,U:S,_in inland areas ..Inland,nyers streams lakes ponds..and wetl�nds. 2 Nav�gable 1Naters walers that.are sub�ect,to the.ebb and tlow_of lhe„tide._and Federally designated nawgable rivers (ihe Mernmack.. Riyer...Connecticut Rrver and Charles River to the Watertown Dam m Massachusetts) .. 3 Special:Aquatic..Sites ..._Include,wetlands and salt marsh. mudflals and vegetated shallows (see (5� below� . 4.... BoaUnp..fa'cllltles.,, Facllitles that proyide .renl.or sell mooring..space such. as marinas, yachl clubs, boat clutis, , boat yards,.,town faalitles dockominwms. etc _ , _,. .................. .... _ _.... .._ 5, ..Vegetated_Shallows,. Subtidal, areas_that.support rooted aquatic vegetatlon. such as eelgrass . _. _....... ___ _. . _. _ _ ............_ .. ......................................... .... ... ak __ ...... ....._........... ___ _._ . . �......... ... ....... ___ _ . _ _ ........... . . ...._.... . .... ................ _._._ .... �... .. �. l�A : ' .. . . .. . . .. . ..��-1 . . . .......... ...I......... ........ ........... . . .. .... ..:........... .. ........... -.... ........... ........................ . ._._........ ..... ._........ . .......... . ............... ........... ........... '(T ....____... ...�...._. .... _.......... . .......�.. .......:. ..�.................. '�':i1 .. ............... .. ............... ............. .. .�........ .. ................ .......... ................. ..... .. ....... . .... .........�. ....................... ......... . .... . . .......... .................. .. . . .......... . .................... .:.. 1 �'............ .................... ............. .................� ... ..i.......... ... .............. ........... ............. . . ..1.. .. .... .. �... .. . ....... ............ ..................... .. ................ .. ................ ................ ... ........... .. .............. _........ .................. ... ......... . ............. ............ .................. .. .. ...�..... ... . ........ ... . ....... ................... . .. .... . ..: �.:'.i'i��a � � )�ii Y.:5j ��. � � ��y�� , u '��;� t�:,`. � . . . i �- +:,+P�,�W�"�%k, ,�' . . ��rif�r , �.. :.n ..::�:' .....:._. . -qu....� . .._ _ ..1.. . � . . . °�}.�'.Yi,�YS.r.-:' .. . -..:_ �t..__ �.. . : ':_':: . .. -� '�' ' � �� .�.:". . . ..-.. . . .- ... ... L I � � � . ' 1��. �Federal Navigatior� Projects in IViassachusetts , =`�' ;�. �' — �� Memmack River �' NEW HAMPSHII2E � � NewburypoR Harbor — � Ipswich River _ _ � Essex River —Sandy Bay �ockport Harbor& Pigeon Cove Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River Island End River _�Beverly Harbor q:?,>,�� Malden River \ — Salem Harbor Ocenn Mystic River 1 Lynn Harbor S MASSACHLJSETTS ��Winthrop Harbor BOSTON j8oston Harbor Dorchester Bay and Neponset River � � � Cohassel Harbor \ , Provincetown Weymouth Fore Weymouth \Hingham Harbor Harbor � Town Rivers Back Fivzr Scituate HarUor ' � Wellfleet Duxbury klarbor \Green Haroor Harbor Kingston Harbor - — —� Plymouth Haroor � Pleasant . � Buttermiik Bay /BaY \ Cape Cod Canal � f Wareham Harbor Ccpe Coe Ba� ` Ne � Bedford 8 �v� � Fairhaven Harbor c� Taunton River - a° Fali River Harbor Sesuit Harbor Stage Harbor Red 8rook Harbor RHODE �a '� ` � a / Andrews'River �,,, I �; Hyannis Harbor ISLAND b.;o- Falmouth Harbor �\ �°—Little Harbor Poliock Rip Woods Hole Harbor Shoals � � Lagoon Pond�Cross Rip Shoals. Westport River � Martha's ° Cuttyhunk Harbor/j Vineyard � Nantucket Harbor Canapitsit Channel Edgartown Harbor p Vineyard Haven Ha�or Menemsha Creek Nantucket i3lock(slm�d Soiunf ,'�: ,'rs:; , � EXHIBIT l� SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERALSTREET SAIEM, MA55ACHU5ETT501970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPNONE JOHN R. SERAFINI,JR. 506-744-0212 I JOHN E. DARLING �/'�r��@ 61�-SBi�2�43 ELLEN M.WINKLER m M11..A,1:A�'f-�J�� TELECOPIER JOSEPH 0. CORqENTI 508-�41-46B3 AUG U Y nra �7'=�Y�.��1 e"�s+a�Bou�� u��iAllcjllSt 9� 1995 HAND DELIVER Frederick J. Harney, Jr. Chairman, Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Response to Written Comments of Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. ("Gulf of Maine") Concerning the Notice of Intent Filed By Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, Boston Street and Howley Street, Salem and Peabody Massachusetts Dear Chairman Harney: This response is presented on behalf of the Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Inc. and John C. Jeffers (collectively "Stop & Shop") to the written comments of Gulf of Maine dated July 19, 1995 which were submitted to the Commission. The responses below are numbered to correspond with the comments listed in the Gulf of Maine Letter, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1. It is correct that a portion of the Site is a Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") Location To Be Investigated ("LTBI") . A copy of the draft Environmental Site Assessment report dated July 14, 1993 prepared by GZA Geo-Environmental, Inc. has been filed with the Conservation Commission as well as a copy provided to Gulf of Maine. The Executive Summary of the GZA Report was submitted to the Commission during the July 20 public hearing and marked as Exhibit 5. 2 . Should remediation be necessary, all required filing fees will be paid. ,, Frederick J. Harney, Jr. August 9, 1995 Page 2 3 . Stop & Shop acknowledges that the canal which runs adjacent to the Site is tidally influenced; however, no intrusion of salinity has been found in the canal along the Site. Since the resource area, Land Subject to Tidal Activity, has no specific performance standards, and since there is no adverse impact from the project, no further action is required. 4 . Various soil and hydrology information has been provided to Gulf of Maine. Stop & Shop does not believe that there are any federal wetlands located on the Site; however, even if certain areas were deemed federal wetlands, they are under 5, 000 square feet in area and thus entitled to a Programmatic General Permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. (See letter from Sommer Environmental dated August 7, 1995, and attachment thereto (Exhibit B) . 5. Exhibit 1 prepared by VHB, Inc. has examined and analyzed the North River elevations during storm events and storm damage as a result of flooding. The stormwater calculations prepared by Eastern Land Survey, Inc. which were submitted and marked as Exhibit 2 during the July 20 public hearing also address this issue. 6. The information concerning the Point Source Discharge has been provided through Exhibit 1, the VHB, Inc. submittal, which details the Outlet Culvert as well as the project's impact on the North River, and through Exhibit 2, the stormwater calculations. Additionally, the drainage system plans and topography of the Site have been provided with the Notice of Intent submittal. 7 . a. Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. has prepared a synopsis of the performance standards and how they are met for the resource areas affected by this project. This document was presented and marked as Exhibit 3 during the July 20 public hearing. b. In correspondence dated August 4, 1995, Stop & Shop submitted a report prepared by VHB, Inc. which addresses how the gas and oil separators will function during major storms and flooding events. Frederick J. Harney, Jr. August 9, 1995 Page 3 8. Land - Stop & Shop has voluntarily performed an environmental site assessment, the results of which were submitted to the Planning Board, the Board of Health, Gulf of Maine, and the Conservation Commission. In summary, two or three isolated areas of contamination around underground storage tanks have been identified. Stop & Shop proposes to remove the tanks and any contaminated surrounding soils prior to development of the site in accordance with existing State Department of Environmental Protection regulations. Groundwater monitoring wells at twenty locations within the site indicate no reportable concentrations of groundwater contamination. Water and Wetlands - Exhibit 1 submitted at the July 20 public hearing addresses the impact of the project on the North River. The conclusion of the submittal is that there will be an increase in flood storage capacity on the site after development. . Hay bales with biodegradable cordage will be utilized. . The Point Source Discharge will have no negative impact on the resource area Land Under Water Body and all of the performance standards for this resource area will be met as outlined in Exhibit 3 prepared by Sommer Environmental and submitted at the July 20 public hearing. . The River elevations and flooding are addressed in Exhibit 1, VHB submittal, Exhibit 2 , Stormwater Calculations, and in the August 4, 1995 submittal to the Commission which details the effects of various storms, and Stop & Shop's Best Management Practices associated with the drainage system. All of the water quality performance standards will be met, as outlined in Exhibit 3 , and the effect of flooding on water quality is addressed in the August 4 submittal to the Commission in � "Attachment A, 'First Flush' Documentation" . Frederick J. Harney, Jr. August 9, 1995 Page 4 . At the July 20 public hearing the question was raised by the City consultant regarding the possible existence of Federal Wetlands on the Site. This area was identified as an abandoned railroad spur. Although Stop & Shop denies the existence of Federal Wetlands on the Site, the abandoned railroad spur in the northwest corner of the property is less than 5, 000 square feet in area and, therefore, pursuant to the Army Corps of Engineers Programmatic General Permit, is automatically permitted and need not be replicated. (See Exhibit B attached hereto. ) 9 . The drainage calculations requested are provided as Exhibit 2 to the July 20 public hearing. l0. The calculations will be signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer as requested. 11. Stop & Shop believes that no Federal wetlands exist on the Site. However, even if the areas identified as potential Federal Wetlands are confirmed as such, such areas are under 5, 000 square feet and, thus, entitled to a Programmatic General Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Exhibit 1 to the July 20 public hearing provides details regarding the culvert/outlet, the construction of which will not adversely affect the resource area Land Under Water Body. 12 . Stop & Shop agrees with the comment contained in paragraph 12 that no wildlife habitat evaluations are required. If the Commission requires any additional information we would be happy to provide such information upon request. Sincerely, THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY by its attorney, ��I�U /��;'� ' ��/�� 70I-IN R. SERAFIN��$R. �// JRS,SR. /ln cc: Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. cc: Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. � EXHIBIT A � GIILF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVtRONMENTAI CONSULTINQ SEIIVICES . 2D4 LAFAYETTE STREET �JtIIY 19, 1995 SALEM,MA Oi970 . (508�1�5-8818 fAX(SOB)T41-88�I8 n'�T.W71�19[II I.U9tCi Salem Planning D'uector One Salem('irecn " Selem, MA 01970 Dear Mr.Luster: I review�d che Nodce of Intent and snpporting documents submitted to[he Salem Conservation Commission by the Stop&3hop Company on May 26, 1995 and, with my assistant Joseph Orul, inspected the wedands and existing condidons during a site visit of the pcoperty, 'Iliese aze my findings. The Notice of Incent,plans and supporting documentadon for the filing provide gcneral and specific detail about the pmject but additional infocmatioa zegatding the�sou�e areas and extent of flooding is necessary. 1 Under descriprion of the projece no mendon is made of the fact�haz the rxoperty may be listed on the harardous waste list nor as to whether any remediation is reqoined nor any precaurions noted to be caken when work is to occur at the site[o protect the Wetiand Resoucce Aree end the North River frona site contamination. A fo�mez mill P1OF�Y is lisced by rhe Massachusats Depaz[ment of Environmental Protecdon (DEP) as a Location To Se Investigated (I,TBn at 9 Howley SmxG Peabody (Site 1!3-3319). I believe that this site is a portion of the pevpeny under teview. 2. NOT Focm Pen i,7� Should remedlation of the property yo nccessary,an addirional filing fce oF$525 - $725 would be required. 3. NOI Perm P�n I IL•m 11 R c�,..y. e.,. Although no box is pcovided,the t�source arca,I,and Subjec[to Tidal Activity, should bc ent�red and checiced. 4, �ne of the smell wedands not proteeted unda rhe Mass DEP Wetland Regulations has wedend plants aad hydrology and is a fedaal wecland. Soil and hydrology infonnauon azs nxessary. ; GULF OF MAM1E RESFMCN CENfER INC. 5. I40I Focm-Flowine Water Bo�ec No menrion is made of the natural fluauation of the elevation of the North River nor in the fluctuation of the river elevation as a result of llooding. 6. NOI Porm Pan III-Work rintion Po'�c ao�++r-Di�cha�s '[he dixhazge to eho North River is a Point Source Discharge,please provide the necessary infortaation required in items 1-4. 7. NOI Fomi Patt IV - Mitivarin Mr9c„r,.� a. Please indicatt how perfom�ance standards wiil be met for Inland Bank; lnland Boniering I.end Subject to kloaiing and Land Under Water Bodies. Land Subject to Tidal Aetion does noc have perfocmance srnndards bat the impact on the�source area should be addressed and any midgating measures dcscribed. b. Please indicate how gav and oi1 separacors will work during periods of flooding on the site. 8. Exhibjt( _ n 'mnm ��J Iam9G[ 4 ntemr L�d. 'me Howley Street property may be listed as a 5ite l,ocation To Be Invesdgated by the Ma�.cachuutts Depattment of Envirow�ental protection, please indicate ehe e�cten[of concaminadon and any neassary temediadon and the procedures m be taken to protxt the wedands. Water nd Vye Ian.�c '►'here is a question regaz+ding whether or not the proposed activi[y shal(reauit in mo[s fnequent flooding on the propeety. Ac chis locadon,the North River also includes the Reso�e Area Land Subjecc ro Tidel Action. Will there be any impact from the project on this Resource AreaT Hay bales with biodegradable coctiage should be ucilized. What is the impaa of conswcrion and operadon of the new point source discharge on The Resource Area Land Under Water BodyT � Describe the nahuat and flood elevation of the North Rivq�. W}�at effea will this river elevadon have on the water elevation in the drainage system,fu�the runoff water matrnent system and in the presence of flood water at the site? What will be the effeci of tlaoding on wacer quality ac che sitel 'Tht ana identified ln the northwest coma of the property as an abandoned tailroad spur containing greater than S0� wetland vegetarion is actually e federa(wedand and al�erations to this a�ea musc be peanitted by the U.S.Asmy Corps of Fngineas under che 404 Progeam. 'Ihorefore,a Mass Wecet Queiicy Certificarion must also be obtained, Wheie on the site wil!this wedand area be replicated? 9. Both the pre and pos[development peaic tunoff rates should be pmvided for both the 10 year and 100 year stam eventa. It appeacs that only[he post development !0 year calculations are provided. I r . ' � GUIF OF MAINE RESEARCN CENIER INC. 'I'hc calwlarions should be sunm�erized and signed and sumped by a iegistercd professional engineer. "I'he proposed drainage sysnem and drainage calcularions have becn reviewed by Charies Qwgley, the Salem Ciry Engineer. 10. F. hihit .- Vel+ nl -daNnns The calculetions provided show an overali increase in flood storage volume as well as incceases in flood storage at each incremencal elevation. The calculations should be signed and stamped by a registeced professional engineer. 11. F.xhibl[F-R�Q�mr_ ene il.�nrinnc The isolated vegetated wedand is not called out as a fedeial wedand and should bo delineated as such. Adequate details are not provided on mitigadon meaau�s to protea LUWB during construcdvn/'installadon of open box culvert at the North River,and there is no mention of miagadon/teplication of the federal wedand which will be filled (this wetland is tocated in Peabody,however). 12, Fxhiblt G- Ha6iL� _P.valua[ionc It is the opinion of GMRC that,under thc regulstions, no wildlife habitat evaluations are nequued 'I�e linear length of Bank m be alteied is undet the thieshold values of 1090 or SO fat, whichever is smaller(310 CMR 10.54(4)(a)(S)). Under the regularions(310 CMR 10.57(1)(a)(3)), azeas of Bordeting Lend Subject to Ftooding "which have 6een so eatensively altered by human acavity that their impcntant wildllfe habitat functions have been effxrively eliminated"do not�eyuire a habicat evaluation. On June 20, 1995, I eonducted a si[e inspection of the property accompanied by my assistant, Joseph Orcel. The wetlands at the site wece inspected and evaluacod according to the Messachusttts Wedands Arotation Acc and Regulations. GMRC is iu agieement with the delineation under the Messac6usetts Wetland Ptotection Act as submitted with the Noticc of Intenc for the projxt. Howev«,it shonld be noced that the isolated wedsad azea described in the ' Notice of 7ntont which concains greater than 5(�!b wetland vegetarion is a fcderal wedand and should be delineated as such. 1f you have any quesdons conceming this matter,please con�act me at the letteifiead address or phone number. 3' caelY. � Hug . ulligan,Ph.D.,I,S Dirnctor . � EXHIBIT B . �.fl�.MER ENVIRONMENTAL �'ECHN�LOGIES INC. ' 65 NEW SALL'M STR�E'f � . ' � - WAKEFIELU,MASSACHUSE7TS 01880 TELEPHONE(Ct7� 24C>-i360 August 7� 1995 tt ' i Sr. A y. John Sera£in , seraPini, Serafini & Darling 63 �'ederal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 6top & Shop, xorlay St. , P�abody/Salem� b!a Non-state pe4e�A1 surisaiational t�etiand . pear John: on August 1, 1995; Mr_ Paul Sommer spoke ta Mr. . Michael E1liott of the U.S . Army Corps of Engineers in Waltham. As of. „ march 1 , 1995 , the Corps of Engineers 3ssued a Programmatic General Permit ("PGP") (see attached) to apply .in conjunction , with MGL Ch. 131, s40 (the Wetlands Protection Actj . This PGP provides for three categories of work; Category Z is a Non-Re- portinq Condition; Category II requires reporting and sareening by the Corps and Category TII requires an individual p�rmit for pr.oposed work_ One issue raised by Dr. Hugh Mulligan of Gulf of Maine Resnurces indicated that the railroad siding identified as sup- ' _ porting wetlands 'vegetation in Peabody, may be a Pederal juris- dictinnal wetland . Under the PGP DePinitzons of Category I (A) (a) , less than 5, 000 s. f. of wetland are .to be filled. In faet, tha area in questions is approximately 2 , 000 s. f: and as such is Kon-Reportable work and covared undsr the PGP. '�herefore, Stop & Shop does � need to file with the corps for the proposed fil].ing of the railroad siding. Please do not hesitata. to call me xegardinq this matter, . should you have any questions. very truly yours, , SOMMER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNO'LOGZES, INC. , � ' y� , � c r ' . . �. � . ��i.�� •,�' ��;��Y��. ��, . P.aul F. sommer -�{(� Pres ident �-%-'�1 PF'S/dan �erafini.mem , _ - , , .� _ .:� _ .� � . :. Permit No. : 1993-01040 Effective Date: March 1, 1995 Expiration Date: March 1, 2000 Applicant: General Public in N;assachusetts ' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PROGRAMMATIC GENERAI. PERMIT -' ,`:� � COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS � The New England Division of the U.S . 'Army Corps �of Engineers hereby issues a � programmatic qeneral permi.t that expedites review of minimal impact work in coastal and inland waters and wetlands within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts . Activities with minimal impacts, as specified by the terms and conditions of this general permit, are either non-reporting (provided required local and state permits and required state certifications are received) , or are to be scre :ned by the Corps and federal resource agencies for applicability under the general permit. The Corps individual permit review process, and activities exempt from Corps jurisdiction, are not affected by this general permit. Activities covered: work and structures that are located in, or that affect, navigable waters of the United States (regulatec' by the Corps under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899) ; and che d�scharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States ( regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Acti . Procedures A. State and Local Approvals For projects authorized pursuant to this genezal permit, when the following state approvals are also required, they must be obtained in order for this qeneral permit authorization to be valid (applicants are responsible for ensuring that all required state licenses and aporovais have been applied for and obtained) : (a) Final Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) (MGL c. 131 Section 40) must be obtained for activities subject to jurisdiction as defined in 310 CMR 10 . 02 . (b) Aaterways license or permit under MGL c. 91, from tne Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Division of Waterways must be obtained for activities subject to jurisdiction, as defined in 310 CMR 9 .05 . (c) Water Quality Certi£ication is required for work in Corps jurisdiction involvinc = discharge to waters of the U.S . So�e projects require an individual 401 water quality certification (wQC1 issued by the Massachusetts DEP before work can proceed (see page 9 for 401 WQC requirements) . " (d) Coastal Zone Management: Any project that meets the terms and conditions -of Category I of this general permit (i . e . , non-renorting) , has been determined to be consistent with the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management plan and does not require any additional coastal zone management ' review. For work being screened under Category II of this general permit, the Corps will coordinate screening of any work in or affecting the coastal zone with the Office of Coastal Zone Management; for these projects applicants will be notified by the Corps if an individual CZM concurrence is required. B . Corps Authorization : Category Z (Non-Reporting) �: Work in Massachusetts that is subject to Corps jurisdiction (see `-`-�_ Condition 2 on page 3) , that meets the definition of Category I on the Definition of Categories sheet (attached) , and that meets a11 of this -c< p. 1 1/1/95,„� ,;_�' �.';� , ._ . , , , . F . �x. ,:��: permit' s other conditions may proceed without application or notification to : a" the Cor s rovided the re uir d federal and loc horiza ' ""�' P P q e , state al aut tions are obtained. Note that the review thresholds under Cateqory Z apply to sin4le, ,,� complete proiects onlv (see �ondition 5) . Also, note that Category I does _ not apply to activities occurring in a component of, or within 0 . 25 mile of a ,�r component of, the National Wild and Scenic River Svstem (see Condition 9, and ?. page 8 for listed rivers in D.assachusetts) . Work that is not subject to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) , but is subject to Corps jurisdiction, is eligible for Corps • authorization under this PGP; although an Order of Conditions is not required, the general permit review thresholds and requirements concerning WQC and CZM consistency apply. Such projects could include activities that are exempt from the WPA, and activities in federal wetlands (e. g. , isolated wetlands) , that are not covered under the WPA. Although Category I projects are non-reporting, the Corps reserves the right to require review for an individual permit if there are concerns for the aquatic environment or ai,y other factor of the public interest (see Condition 4 on Discretionary Authority) . C . Corps Authorization : Category II (Screening) For projects that do not meet the non-reporting thresholds apolicants are re uired to submit an a io - , q licat n to the Cor s for a case-b case PP P Y determination of applicability under this general permit (Category II) . Category II proiects maV not proceed until written notification is received from the Corps, and the applicable certifications or waivers concerninq water quality and coastal zone manaaement (CZM) are received bv the apolicant. Applicants will be notified by the Corps if an individual CZM consistency concurrence is reguired. PIo`e that Category II does not apply to activities occurring in a component of, or wi�hin 0 . 25 mile of a component of, the National Wild and Sceaic River Svstem (see Condition 9, and page 8 for listed rivers in Massachusetts) . For Category II projects, applicants filing a notice of intent (NOI) with their local Conservation Commission should submit a copy of their NOI materials to the Corps at the same time they apply to their Commission, along with additional information concerning tne work withir. Corps jurisdiction (see below) . Category IZ applicants shall submit a copy of their application materials to the Historic Preservatio� Officer at the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MIIC) to be reviewed for the presence of historic/archaeological resources in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed work. Applications to the Corps should include information to indicate that this has been done (aDplicant ' s statement or a copy of their cover letter to MHC) . The Corps will detarmine if Category II applications (.1) require additional information (see below) ; (2) are appropriate foz' screening with the federal resource agencies (Environmental Protection Agency, U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service) ; (3) are ineligible under the terms and/or conditions of this general permit; or (4) will require individual pennit review, irrespective of whether the terms and conditions of this general permit are met, based on concerns for the aquatic environment or .. any other factor of the public interest (see Condition 4 on Discretionary Authority) . = Additional information required may include : A, . (a) purpose of the project; E` (b) 8 1/2" by 11" plan views of the entire property and project limits with ¢ existing and proposed conditions (leqible, reoroducible plans ,�';- reauired) ; w-_ p. 2 1/1/95 E I . . ..:;: .� , ,., ....._..... -...� r fy>^r. _� � � ' �� - . . . � � ' r'g. i � . . ( . . .. . � - . ' . •.�p (c) wetland delineation for the site, information on the basis of the r, delineation, and calculations of waterway and wetland impact areas {see s: Condition 2 on page 3) ; " (d) typical cross-section views of all wetland and waterway fill areas and wetland replication areas; �� (e) delineation of submerged aquatic vegetation, e.g. , eelgrass beds, in �� tidal waters; �' (f) amount, type and source of fill material to be discharged i�to waters and �� wetlands, including the volume of fill below ordinary high water in inland waters, and below the high tide line in coastal waters; (g) mean low, mean high water and high tide elevations in navigable waters; (h) limits of any Federal navigation project in the vicinity and State Plane coordinates for the limits of the proposed work closest to the Federal project; (i) alternatives analyses submitted to the DEP for W4C review, and/o�r additional information compiled on alternatives; (j ) for dredging projects include the volume of material and area in square feet to- be dredged below mean high water, existing and proposed water depths, type of dredging equipment to he used, nature of material (e .g. silty sand) , any existin� sediment grain size and bulk sedimeat chemistry data for the proposed or any nearby projects, information on the location and nature of municipal or irdustrial discharges and occurrence of any contaminant spills in or near the project area, location of t^=_ disposal site (include locus sheet) . Additional information may be requested by the CorDs; dredging apolicants may be required to conduct a shellfish survey, and sediment testinc, including physical, chemical and biological testing. , D . Corps Authorization: Category III (Individual Permit) Work that is in Category IZI on the attached Definition of Categories sneet, or that does not meet the terms and conditions of this general permit, will require an application for an individual permit from the Corns of r',ngineers (see 33 CFR Part 325 . 1) . The screening procedures outlined above will only serve to delay project review in such cases . The appropriate application materials (including either the NOI joint application form or the Ccrps application form) should be submitted by the applicant at tne earliest possible date; general information and application forms can be obtained at ( 617) 647-8338 . Individual water quality certification and coastal zone management consistency concurrence will be required. E . Programmatic General Permit Conditions : The following eonditions agply to activities authorized under the Progiammatic Genetal Permit, including all Category I (non-reportinq) �and Category II (screening) activities: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: - . 1. Other Permits. Authorization under this qeneral permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Fedeial, state, oz local authorizations required by law. � � - 2. olicabilitv of this eneral oermit shall be evaluated with reference to� Federal _ jurisdictional boundaries. Applicants are responsible foc ensurinq that the boundaties used satisfy the federal cziteria defined at 33 CFR 328-329. - 3. Minimal Ef£ects . Projects authorized by this qenetal permit shall have minimal ;,.'p; individual and cumulative adverse environmental impacts as determined by the Corps. `�' ;�: p 3 1/1/95�'� z� , ' , _iF' 1 �q ^HW yn � _' _ _ :<�!.'� ' . . . - . . . . . . .Ff. . . , . .. �':7 . . ..,-.'t'v 9. Discretionary Authozity. Notwithstanding compliance with the terms and conditions o£' this pezmit, the Cozps of Engineers tetains discretionary authority to require review for:., -,• an individual permit based on concezns for the aquatic environment or fot any othe=. factor: � of the public interest. This authority is invoked on a case-by-case basis whenever the '��. Corps determines that the potential. consequences of the proposal warrant individual review.�� based on the concerns stated above. This authority may be- invoked £or pzojects with� �`-��"'>''� cumulative envitonmental impacts that are more than minimal,- or if there is a special �.... �' �`_ zesource or concern associated with a particulat project, that is -not alr.eady covered by :,:;?_; - the remaining conditions of the PGP, that warrants greater seview. � � - � Whenever the Corps notifies an applicant that an individual permit may be required autho=ization undez this general permit is voided, and no s+ork may be eondueted until- the �:�= � individual Cor s ermit is obtained, oi until the Cotps notifies the applicant that P P further review has demonstrated that-the work may proceed under this general permit. � . . 5. Single and Complete Projects. This general permi.t shall not be used for piecemeal work and shall be applied to single and complete projects. All components of a single project shall be treated together as constituting one single and complete project. All � planned phases of multi-phased pzojects sha11 be treated to.gether as constitLting one single and complete pzoject. This general permit shall not be used for any activity that is part of an overall project foz which an individual permit is required. � NATIONAI, CONCERNS: � � 6. Historic Ptoperties. Any activity authorized by this genetal permit sha?1 comoly with � Section 106 of the National Histozic Preservation Act. Information on the location and existence o£ historic resources can be obtained from the Massachusetts Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Places. If the permittee, during construction of work authorized herein, encour.te:s a previously unide^tified archaeological ot othei cultural resource wit?�in the area subject to Department of the Army jutisdiction that might be eligible foz listing in the National Register of Historic Places, he/she shall immediately notify the Divisior. Engineer. 7. National Lands. Activities authotized by this general permit shall not impinge upon the value of any National Wildlife Aefuge, National Forest, National Matine Sanctuary (e.g. Stellwagen Bank) or any area adm:nistered by the National Pazk Service (e.g. Cape Cod National Seashore) . . � . � 8. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized under this gene;al permit yrhich may affect a threatened or endangered species or a species pzoposed foz such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangezed Species Act (ESA) ; o= which is likely to destioy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species; or which would result in a "take" of any threatened or endangered species of fish or wildlife, or which would result in any other violation of Section 9 of the ESA pzotecting thieatened or endangered species of plants. Applicants shall notify the Corps if any listed species or critical habitat is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work until notified-by the distri-ct engineer that the zequirements of the Endangeied Species Act have been satis£ied and that the activity is authorized. Infotmation on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained Erom the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Mazine Fisheries Service (addresses attached, page 8) . 9. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity is authorized under this genezal permit that occurs in a component of, or within 0.25 mile of a component of, the National Wild and - - Scenic Rivez System, including rivers officially designated by Conqzess as study rivers foz possible inclusion in the system, while such zivers are in an-official study status. `. Curzent rivers that this applies to in Massachusetts aze listed on page 8. - 10. Federal Navigation Project. Any structuze or work that extends closer to the - horizontal limits of any Cozps' navigation ptoject than a distance of thzee times the �` project's authorized depth (see attached map foz locations of these projects) shall be *;, � q 1/1/45 � P• � . _ -. }*�. . ,..:_ � _ . :�.+ �:.s. r , r:'..: , '.: �:_ . ' :;1. . _;;D f a1'�.�.. =F .•i,r J .. :. r _ . . .. . . . ' ..i:.•f. , o:. .:.�,' � . ��':� . . . . . : . . ... . . ��. �:.1. �� subject to removal at the ownei's expense priot to any future Corps' dredging or the �. pe=formance of periodic hydrographic surveys. � � "�� 11. Fede=al Liability. Zn issuinq this permit, the £ederal Government does not asstime -'�: any liability for the followinq: (a) damaqes to the permitted project or uses thereof as a'`,� result of other permitted oi unpermitted aetivities or fzom natural causes; (b) damaqes� to�k'r � the permitted pzoject or uses thezeof as a zesult of current or future activities . _" undertaken.by oz on behalf of the..United States in the public interest; (c) damaqes to �' ersons, pro e=t "�'' p p y, or to other permitted or unpezmitted activities or structu=es caused by ;�; the activity authorized by this pezmit; (d) desiqn ot consttuction deficiencies associated �'-_- with the permitted work; (e) damage claims associated with any futuze modification, ��.j�� suspension, or revocation of this permit. - ". 12.- Navigation. Theie shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the existence or use of the activity authorized herein, and no attempt shall be made by the pezmittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the activity authorized herein. �'��. MINIMIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: . � 13. Minimization. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of� the United . States shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. � � 14. Work in Wetlands . Heavy equipment working in wetlands sha11 he avoided if possible, � and if required shall be placed on mats to minimize soil and vegetation disturbance. . Disturbed areas in c+etlands shall be zestoted to preconst�uction contours upon completion �. of the work. In many cases the mats are considezed a discharge of fill material and musf be included in the quantification of impact area, and authorized by this general permit. 15. Temporary Fili. Temporary fill in waters and wetlands authorized by this general . � permit (e.q. access roads, cofferdams) sha11 be properly stabilized durinq use to prevent erosion. Temporary fill in wetlands shall be placed on geotextile fabzic laid on existing wetland grade. Temporary fills shall be disposed of at an upland site, suitably contained to prevent erosion and transport to a watetway or wetland. Temnorary fill areas shall be restored to theit original contours. 16. Sedimentation and Erosion Control. Rdequate sedimentation and ezosion conttol management measures, practices and devices, such as phased constiuction, veqetated filtet � strips, geotextile silt fences or other devices, shall be�. installed and properly maintained to reduce erosion and retain sediment on-site during and after construction. They shall be capable of preventing etosion, of collecting sediment, suspended and floating materials, and of filtering fine sediment. These devices shall be removed upon completion of work and the distutbed areas shall be stabilized. The sediment collected by � these devicas shall be removed and placed at an upland location, in a manner that will prevent its later erosion into a watetway or wetland. All exposed soil and othet fills - shall be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. 17. Waterwa Crossings . (a) A11 temporary and permanent crossinqs of watezbodies shall Y � be suitably culverted, btidqed, or otherwise designed to withstand and to pcevent the •- cestriction of high flows, and so as not to obstruct the movement of aquatic life � - indiqenous to the waterbody 6eyond the actual duzation of construction. (b) No open _ trench excavation shall be allowed in flowing waters. (cj Temporary bridges, culverts, oz _ coffezdams sha11 be used foi equipment access acioss stiear.is (note: areas of fill and/oc coffezdams must be included in total waterc+ay/aetlands inpacts to determine applicability 'w of this qeneral permit) . (d) For pzojects that otherwise meet the terms of Cateqoty I, ;l:''=,`,�",x instzeam construction work shall be conducted during the low flow period July 15 - October '� 1 in any yeat; projects that are not to be conducted during that time petiod are 2;�`� :,r'� p, 5 1/1/95_�,� _.� -'v �._ . �y ;:�. :.. . ... ... ... - Z _ ' _ �. . .. ._ . . - ; . � ._. .. . � ineliqible for Category I and shall be sczeened pursuant to Category II, zeqardless of the �" �, waterway and� wetland fi1T and/or impact area. :�-�-.�' .aa- >-,5.., 18. Dischaige of Pollutants. Al1 activities involving any discharge of pollutants into �� watets of the United States authorized under �this general permit shall be consistent with"=�'�` � applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations, standards of performance, � pzohibitions, and pretzeatment standards and manag�ment practices established pursuant to - the Clean Watez Act (33 U.S.C. 12511 , and applicable sta*.e and local lacrs. Zf applicable - Water quality standards, limitations, etc., are revised or modified during the term of this permit, the authorized wotk shall be modified to conform with these standards within � 6 months of the effective date of such tevision ot mod�fication, or within a longer period �� . of time deemed reasonable by the Division Engineer in consultation with the Regional - Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. P.pplicants may presume that State � �- t+ater qvality standards are met �+ith issuance of the 401 Water Quality Ceitification. 19. Spawning A.reas. Discharges in fish and shellfish spawning oz nursery azeas duzing spawning seasons shall be avoided, and impacts to these areas shall be avoided o= minimized to the maximum extent practicable during all times of year. 20. Storage of Seasonal Stzuctures. Coastal structures such as pier sections, £loats, etc. , that are ren,oved from the �+aterway for a portion of the year shall be stored in an upland location, located above mean high water znd not in sa'_t marsh. 21. Environmental values. The permittee shall make every reasonable effort to carry out � the const=uction or operation of the vork authorized herein in a mannez so as to maintain � as much as is practicable, and to minimize any adverse irooacts on, existing fish, � wildlife, and natural envizonmental values. PROCEDURAL �ONDZTIONS: - - 22. Inspections. The permittee .shall permit the Division Engineer or his authorized representative (s) to make peziodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in oidez to ensure that the work is beinq performed in accordance with the terms � and conditions of thi� permit. The Division Engineer may also require post-construction engineering drawings for comnleted wozk, � and post-dredging survey drawings foz any dredging work. 23. Maintenance. The permittee shall maintain the work or structuzes authorized herein ' in . ood condition, includin maintenance to ensure ublic safety. Dredgin zojects: note 4 4 P 9 P that this does not include maintenance of dredging projects. Maintenance dredging is . subject to the review thresholds on page 10, and/ot any conditions included in a written Corps authorization. 24. Property Rights. This permit does not convey any pzoperty rights, either in real estate or material, or any �xclusive ptivileges, nor does it authorize any injury to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal, State, or� local laws or regulations. 25. Modification, Suspension and Revocation. This permit may be either modified, suspended, or revoked in whole or in part pursuant to the policies and procedures of 33 CFR 325.7; and any such action shall not be the basis for any claim for damages against the United States. 26. Re>toration. The permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of authoiization under this permit, shall restore the wetland or watetway to its formet conditions, ti+ithout expense to the United States and as directed by the Secretary of the Army or his authorized repzesentative. If the permittee fails to comply crith such a L-' .G'... :2?`-. , 6 1/1/95 .. . P• ;��J_�;.,� :;: �=:.. - � �c� , . ;, �:,. .�. ..._: _ n- � _ ;:>� _ . _ ,., .. _ ` - ;�T _.,;,; >�.;. ::;;�_. ;,:.,w directive, the Secretary or his desiqnee may restote the wetland or urate�ray to its foimer._. conditian, by contract oz otherwise, and zecover the cost from th� permittee. ` 27. Special Conditions. The Corps may impose other special conditions on a project. authozized pursuant to this genetal permit that are determined necessaty to minimize _ � adverse envi=onmental effects or based on any other factor of the public inte=est. . �- thorization inclu ' e ' Failure to com 1 with all conditions of the au , ding sp ual conditions, :_ , P Y � will constitute a permit violation and may svbject the permittee to criwinal, . civil, or -�,�.'�� administrative penalties, or testoration. ` H�: 28. False oi Incomplete Information. If the Corps makes a determination regaiding the . � - eligibility of a pzoject under this permit, and subsequently discovers that it has =elied on false, incomplete oz inaccurate information provided by the peLmi.ttee, the permit shall � not be valid and the Government may institute appropriate legal proceedinqs. . 29. Abandonment. If the permittee decides to abandon the activity authorized under this qeneral permit, unless such abandonment is merely the transfer of property to a thitd party, he/she must iestore the area to the satisfaction of the Division Engineer. 30. Enfotcement cases. This gene�al permit does n�t apply to any existing or proposed activity in Corps jurisdiction associated with an on-go�.ng Corps of Engineets enforcement action, until such time as ihe enforcement action is resolved o= the Corps determines that the activity may pzoceed indenendently without compromising the enforcement action. DURATION OF AUTHORIZATION/GRAFIDFATHERING: � 31. Duration of Authorization. Ac�ivities authorized undec this general per:nit that have been commenced (i.e. , ate under consttuction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon this authorization will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the qeneral permit's expiration, modification, or [evocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the authozization in accordance with 33 CcR 325.2 (e) (21 . Activities completed under the authorization of the general permit that c+as in effect at the time the activity was comoleted will continue to be authorized by the general permit. . 32. Previously Authorized Activities. (a) Activities which have commenced, i.e. are under construction ot aie under contiact to commence, pcior to the issuance date of this general permit, in reliance upon the terms and conditions of the non-reporting cateqory of the previous Massachusetts PGP, shall iemain authoiized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of issuance of this qenezal permit, unless discretionary authority has been exeicised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the authorization in accotdance with Condition 4. The applicant must be able to document to the Corps ' satisfaction that the pcoject was under const=uction or contzact by the appropriate date. (b) Projects that have received written vetification or approval from the Corps, based on applications made to the Corps prior to -issuance of this general permit, for the previous Massachusetts PGP, Nationwide permits, tegional general peimits, or letters of permission shall remain autho=ized as specified in each authorization. (c) Activities authorized pursuant to 33 CFR Part 330.3 (activities occurring before cettain dates) are not affected by this general permit. �- . �. �, L� z8 99 � DI ICT ENG EER DATE u 4`. i':S. 'r� p � 1/1/95 ,�,` y� _, , _ _ � '-. � . :. . :.. . . :�.:.;.. .;.�F r.:. - ...:. .. . . . . 'r'yp. �� - . _::..ii. ' . .'•fPy.-,= Coatacts for Progra�atic General Permit: � � January 1, 1995 � U.S. Army Corps oE Engineers Coastal Zone Management Regulatory Division 100 Cambridge Street 20th Floor - 924 Trapelo Road Boston, Massachusetts 02202 Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-9199 617-727-9530 '��-'�:° 617-647-8335 800-343-4789 (ME, VT, NH, RZ, CT) 800-362-9367 (Massachusetts) - Massachusetts Historical Cozcmtission National Park Service The Massachusetts Archives Bldg. North Atlantic Region 220 Mozrissey Boulevard � 15 State Street - �. Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Boston, N.assachusetts 02109-3572 � 617-'I27-H970 Federal Endangered Speeica: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Matine Fisheries Service 22 Bzidge Street Unit #1 One Blackburn Drive Concord, New Hampshire 03301-4901 Gloucestei, Massachusetts 01930-2296 603-225-1411 508-281-9300 Masaachus�tts Department o£ Environmental Prot�ction (DEP) : DEP Division of Wetlands and Wateriaays One Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 617-292-5695 Regional DEP OfFicea : � DEP-Western Aegion DEP-Southeast Region Wetlands Protection Program Wetlands Pzotection Program 436 Dwight Streat 20 Riverside Drive, Route 105 Springfield, Massachusetts O1103 Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347 913-784-1100 SCB-946-2800 DEP-Central Region DEP-Northeast Region Wetlands Protection Program Wetlands Protection Progzam 75 Grove Street 10 Commerce Way � Worcestet, Massachusetts 01605 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 508-792-7650 617-932-7600 National Aild and Scenic Rivers System seqments and study segments for � Massachusetts as of June 2, 1992, include: Nest Branch of the Farmington River from Hayden Pond in Otis downstream to the confluence with Thorp Btook in Sandisfield; � Sudbuzy/Assabet/Coacord Rivers as follows: the ��Sudbury ftom the Danforth Street . bridge in Framingham downstream to the confluence �+ith the Assabet, the Assabet fiom 1000 ' feet belo`t the Damon Mill Dam downstzeam to the con£luence �+ith the Sudbury, and the Concord from the confluence of the Sudbuzy and Assabet downstream to the Route 3 bridge in Billerica; and the iiestfield River as follows: East Branch from the Cummington/Windsoz, MA, town line downst=eam to 0.8 mile upstream of the confluence with Holly Brook, the Middle Branch fzom the Peru/Worthington, MA, town line downstream to the con£luence with - Kinne B=ook, and 0.9 mile of the Glendale Brook tributary from Clazk Wright Road bridge to � the confluence with the Middle Bzanch, and the West Branch from the railroad bridge 2000 feet downstream oE Becket Village in Becket, MA, docrostream to the Chester/Huntinqton, MA, � town line. Projects located in theae aegmenta, or r�rithin 0.25 .mile np- or - --� donn-stream, or 0.25 mile upatream on any tributary, are e�ccluded from the PGP. � � p. 8 Janaery 1, 1995 ". nyf.`:. �� .T`�J,i�.. . . b5ic.± .. � .;%;'r,"�,•.�'.: �y�' y.T ^L"n �.:s` :`! i n-.� �.N :� ��.3"'�t.k?� � Yn:3��xy.7 r � e �: < �r (c,j i vyYh+�S'°..!"'�.-. , �'�� ' � - _. . a 4:_F�.. , . .' . . � . . � . . .. . 4,%'Y � � . � , � . - . . " . . - . .. . . .�}�,. 401 Aater Quality Certification: January 1, 1995 �. . - __.�_�'�� For work in Corps jurisdiction involving a discharge to waters of the U.S. , an individual 401 water quality certification (WQC) must be obtained .: _- from the Massachusetts DEP before work can proceed pursuant to this general i permit for the following circumstances (pursuant to MGL c. 21 Sections 26 - : ,:�' 53 and regulations at 314 CMR 9.00, .as supplemented by the Interim Guidance ;_-;� effective 10/1/92) , until replaced by revised regulations in early 1995: :;�::, `�;i I 1. proposed work that is not subject to the WPA (310 CMR 10.00) but does -- require a 401 Water Quality Certification and proposes the loss of bordering veqetated wetlands, land under water, or federal non-state wetland (e. g. , WPA exemptions) ; 2 . any project intended to create a real estate subdivision for which a Notice of Intent is submitted on or after October 1, 1992; 3 . any project which will result in the loss of more than 5, 000 square feet of bordering veretated wetlands or land under water; 4 . proposed work in Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs) as designated in 319 CMI2 4 . 00; 5 . proposed work in coastal areas which will result in the loss of any amount of salt marsh; �6., projects involving dredgina morz than 100 cubic yards in navigable waters . `�±s �.`:x p, 9 .7anuary 1, 1995 ".;� . � ,� LL'�L'�11V1'L'lvlv vc L.tatl:.vv..J..:..+ ;; ' � .. ........ . . . ... . ................ ........................................................ .. . ._........ . ................. . ..___ � CATEGORY I CATEGORY 11 INDIVIDUAL PERMIT _... . .._ _. .._.... . ............. ..... , ,.,....__ . , A INLAND..WATERS AND WE3 LANDS (WATERS OF U S. I�I ) '� . .... ... _. . � .. .. ...................................................................... jaj NEYV.FILL/EXCAVATION �ess_lhan 5000.s,1 Inland watenvay !.5000 s.f. 1o..l .acre Inland_waterway Greater..lhan. t,_acre.lnland,.waferway. „ DISCHARGES: __ �an�or wetland fill and secondary,._ �andlor welland fill and. secondary , „or wetland.fill and seconda ry unpacls (e g ,,,areas dralned, 800cled or ,l lmpacts �e g ,, areas drained, flooded or ,impacts (e,p....,areas dralned,.11oaled or _ _. � p cl�ared im .act area Includes.all,.,. ,cleared).... Impad area Includes all ;cleared).__Im act area Includes..all ._. _..._ . P _......._. _.... . . temporary and permanent hll and ... . .: temporary and permanent, fill and .,temporarZr_and permanent i an..... _. _.... excayation discharges.. ,... :. „excavalion discharges. �excavation, discharges,.._._....___.. .. ,.. Ihis category exGudes dams .dikes ,,r _Any dam...dike water diversion or ... _._. _ . _... ; water diversions, water withdrawals , .._water withdrawal pro�ed .,._,_.,. EIS requued by )he Corps - In-stream work limited to Jul.y,. 15 -,..Tlme of-year restriction .to be. „ ....... . ........... .... _....._ __.,. ... , __..... Oct. 1 ,;.......determined case-by-case ;.... ... .. . ...... . ...... _ .. �._ .. __. . __.... . (b) BANK.STABILIZATION „ Inland bank_stabll¢ahon.less lhan,, Inland bank stabil¢ahon greater lhan _ PROJECTS: 6u0 ft .Iengfh.and,iess than 1.c y. fili .�500 R length and/or �reater than _....__.. _...... .. .... � ;:r linear foot, below ordmary high �� 1 c y hll..per linear foot or any.. �_,_ _ water provided, no wetland hll.. _ :amount with,.fdl in wetlands. „_ ;._, __..... . . .. ..... .. v (c) RFPAIR AND MAINTENANCE Fizpair/maintenance of, exishn� ,,, , i Replacement ol non-serviceabie fdl Replacement..of non-seryiceable lill � OF AUTHORIZED FILLS:. c�urently serviceable . aWhonzed hlls or repalrlmaintenance ,of serwceable or repair/malntenance of seryiceahle �„ _ �. - .. o wilh,no expans�on or,change in,use. ,.,611,..wtth expansion of any amount up to .;fill greater.than. 1 .acre,....... ,... _.., __. ` 1 �cre or wilh change m use, ....... _..._. __. _ _ _ _ _ . ... . , B TIDAL .WATERS AND NAVIGABLE .WATERS ..I2) ,., ... , .. ................ . . . ..... (a) FILL Fills_ authonzed by Ch. 91 amnesty � Up to 1 acre waterway fill and/or ,Grealer, than 1..acre.waterway .fill . ,,. �,rogram (e g;,. seawalig,_, bulkheads) secondary_waterway_and wetland and/or secondary waterway or ,,,. _ _ ...... . . _.._ .. . ...__ ...... . ......_ .. ,,,Impac{s {e.a:,. areas,drained..or , welland impacts.(ep , areas,dralned_or _..... . __ ....... No provisions.lor new fill in Cat I. �.flooded)....Fill includes temporary and . „flooded)..,.Fill mcludes tempora.ry,and._... ,:permanent..,waterway„ 1ill. ,.permanent._waterway, fill. ........ _ . ... ............. ................... Tem orar , salt marsh fill or excavation Tem orar salt marsh.,,fll.,or,,.excavatlo. _ . _ _ ..._ _ , .... P.. .. Y . _ _ F .. X .... .... . . .. ��discharges.up to 1 acre . _, discharges �reater.than.l.acre ..... ............................................... M " "' „No provisions tor permanen) salt .Permanent salt. marsh.fll,..any..amounL.. ,� _._ _...... _. _ � _._.. ........._. , marsh fill in PGP. ! _ . __..._ _ ,..__.. . ___ ....... .... ...... .... .. ... ... ..... \ __...... __....__. . .. . . ;.EIS required bY..the Corps:...... ....... . _..._.. ..... ....._. _.._._ �.,_....... ................. ..... N ' � .. . ............ .. ................ .. . .... � W . . . . _....... _ ......,.. .. .. ._ ..__._. ...i.i ..... .. .,. .... .... . . .. . . . � . .. . . ....... ......... . . . . .. . . .. . .. � jb)REPAIR.AND.MAINTENANCE;Repaidmaintenance, of existing,_,... Replacement of any,non,servlceable �;Replacemant_o(.non-servlceable,._,,,,,,,,,,, "' WORK , currently-serytceable authonzed,_ ��s)ructure or .lill, or_repau%maintenancfl�.structure or fill, or repal�lmalntananc ... slructures and .hlls, includin� amnesty.�.�of,a.sernceable structure or.fill..wuh ..._�.ot._serviceable...atructure, or,.fll,._with__,,,,. , ?approyed..flls,.wlth no..expansion._or .. ,.,expanslon.or.chan.ge in.use..(fll.limits 1 .,hll replacement,or,expanslon„greater ., ... . ........ .. ...... . � change in use. :i acre tor replacemPnt and/or ex anslon).i than 1 ac�e. x;,a� ' . y �r��-`^�i�� ti 1Jt.� 1 F t�y�"�*� , .y�7�+�.� Y �`y � � ��r �i,.ti: . . ._ .. ' , - . . - . �� ii1�� d . .`;i... . . . . . _ T� . �� • CATEGORY I ';CATEGORY II INDIVIDUAL PERMIT __................................._......._;_......................_.......................................__.....................,.,... ....._.........................................._...............................:.:._..................._....................................................................... . . :: �c DREDGING;,.._...__............ ..........._;MalnJenance,_dredging,.les;._)h.an 1,000 f: Malntenance dredging.,grealer_than :Malntenance dredgiqg._(any,amount�_In.._.. ..�.. �.. .... ..... .. ....._� ..... ... ...... .... cy .with, upland dlsposal, provlded .,,,. ,,,.1 000 c.y,. or_that does not meet the ,;or.affectin�_a special aquatic,site.(3� ..... proper,_slitahon._controls. are used,,,.,, terms ln. Cat I upland.disposal.or ar.,Hnth open waEer. disposal , ...,,, hmited to dred�ing and disposal �beach nounshmenl requlred and no ... . . operatlons conducted between Nov 1 � Impacls to speclal aquatic sdes (3�. , ,... _.,, ;and Jan.._1.5; with no.tmpact to speclal : See (a) above br limitations on Jill for __. . . . ...... _ .aquatic siles (3). beach nourlshment ,,,,,..... _...... . __._......_ ...... ..... , __,_. ... _. ....... ...... __ _ , ....... . . .... _ .. . .. .. .. . _.. ........................... __.. __ _. _ ... __. .........._ __. . :New dredgin� up to 10 000 c y ,,,upland .New_dredging greater. than_ 10,000 c.y.. , disposal or beach nourishment reqwred or..of any amount m.or._alfectin�_a ._.._.... _ _ __._ See (a) above for limitations on„lill for _speaal aquatic.site (3), or with..open..,..._ _ .._.. __ .... . _ _ _._. __. , , beach nourishmenl. water d�sposal. .. _ _ __... . __ . _. __ _ __ . ... ....._ _ _. . , _ _... _ .. F _ .... _. . .. . ........ .................. ........ .... _ (d) MOORINGS Pnvate non commercial ,.,non renlal Moorings ihal.do nol meet the terms in . Moormgs wdhin .the horizontal..,limits� _ __.. . _ ... _ _.. ... sinc�le boat moonn�s not assoc�ated with CaL,I and moonn�s that meet the or.with moored vessels..that_extend.,, , _... any_boatfng lacilily..�4� prov�ded. nol . ,,lerms_o1.Cat., 1 that are, locafed within. ,;withiq,the Iimits,.,of Corps.,Federal .. . ,� locat.ed m Federal.Navigation Project a Federal anchorage _Nawgallon.profect, except„those In......,. _. .__. _ , ... , ; ; ,Pederal anchorages.under.Cat,.II �' :- .... .. .... _ (e� PILE-SUPPORTED. . _ Prrvate bottom-anchored Iloats up to Private plets„and floals that do not , Any.structure, ..pler.,.or, lloat,.fhat..__.._.., STRUCTURES AND FLOATS: , 400 s,f in s¢e and meet, the terms m Cal I, _ extends or wdh docked or moored Pnvate ..pile supported piers for vessels that extend within the _. .. . ....... � _... .__. _... nayigalional.,access.to the watenvay, Expanslons to existinc� boating horizoMal..limits_.of.a Corps,.Federal up to 1,000 s f in.s¢e.with attached ,_IaciliUes ,4),,.._. Navigation_.ProJect � ' _ ....... . ....... { � floats up to...200 s.L (lotal� _... _ _ ................ ..................................... �� _.. - - �,Shuctures, including„piers„and._tloats,,,,,. ;�, __. . _... _ _ ....... . ,Provided , _ _._... „associated with.a new.,or preylously �t _ : _ _ _..... <.. tloats.are supported off_lhe subglrate „ _ unauthorized.boaJing..facility.,f4�.._.,. , _._._ __.... at ,low_tide�.. __ . .... - structures and moored vessels are � _... . . . .. .... . . _.......... _ __.. _ ...... ....... . not positioned over. vegelated � _. � _.. _. .. . shallows. ,5) or salt marsh __ _.... . .. � .......... ............................. Ch,._91 .license.has been..issued (for _,_ _ .... pile-supported. structures only� _ . ....... .... ... ........ �., not,assocla)ed wllh..a boating facility _..,_,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _ .... _ .. .. . : � �4a� _ . ) not located wilhin 3..times the.depth ; ,,,, ,. ' _ . . ............... ... . . _of a Corps Federal NavigaUon.ProJect ,_ .,..,.. . ... .. ................................. ... �� =,� _ � ; .........._ .... .. ............ . ..... . .._ _...__.. .._.....__.,_. .. ...... ................. . ....... ..... ... , ; _ __... �� ....... t.. �Plers..and.structures.licensed by.Ch..91 : _. ., _ _... . ......... . . ..........:.............. _......._ ... ,.. , ;:.ti i lhrough lhe amnesly program. :• .�'w:' ;�,. . r y1;'�y �� i?�,}l��l��\'�.P:i . . . . . ,.� / ' ,.r�i4l�$ � . -------- ---- - . � iCA7EGORY I ; CATEGORY II '.;INDIVIDUAL PERMIT � : . ..... _..... _....... ,.._... _.... _. _....... . . ..................... .................. .... ........... ......_ . . �fJMISCELLANEOUS ._.....,_,.,. . ;Temporary. buoys,. .markers, floats, ;,Structures.or.work in..or aflecting. EIS.requlredby.the.Corps........_.._.., . ,,,. , and simllar.structures for recreatlonal ,tidal and..navigable'waters fhat are ; ... ........ . ............. .. _ _._.... .... ;;.. o work within the � e eadin s i Structures r : use..durin�.specific eyents prowded.... ,. not defined under any.ol th.. h ... ,g..._... ,;. . . . ,.... they..are.removed withln 30 days,atter �Ilsted aboye. Includes,.but is, not limited horizontal, limits oi Corps, Federal. ,,, __ the use has been discontinued ,, to, utility lines aenal transmission navlgatlon projects�__o�, v�nth docked or __ . _.._. _... ....._ _ _._ _ Ilnes pipelmes out(alls boal ramps moored yessels that extend wilhin • Coast Guard-approved aids to brld�es etc ,:those limits. Does_not Include..wility._... I _ . __._.._ __ __ ___._ navigation. .,_.. ,,, ,,.,,, Imes aedal,...and..subsuAace._crossin�s_ : Shellfish aquacWlure faciliUe., reler fall into Cat II _ _ . .. _ .... ...... . .. ... Oil .spol clean-up temporary siructures to limitalions o( Corps Aquacullure _. _..._. _. _. _. . .. and lill Letter ol Permission dated Sep, 1 __ .. _ _.. _. . _ � 1991 for.guidelines. _. .. _ ,.... _ _._ _. .. ,._.. _ _ . .. I Fish and wildl ;e harvesting strudures :, _ _ _ ' _ _. _. _......... __ _ _. .. _..... _.... . _ and hll. _ ___.... . ... __ _._... __... .._ _._ _ ._ __ . _. . _..._...__ .. ...._._..... __._ ��-�� Scienlific measur�ment devices and I : . . .. � . ........ . ._. .. ...... ..:..._......_ ................. .... ............ ........_.. ..,...... .. ..._...._ .. .. . . ;.__. .......__.. .. ................ .____...... .__.__..... _...._ _.... ... . survey aclivities such as exploralory ' _. _...__ .._ _... _ _.. drdlin� ,surveying and.sampling _ _ _ „ b ' activilies. Does not include oil and gas ; . _ ._.... _ ....._ _ _ . _ _._ _.. _ _._. __... r exploration and till lor roads or " _ ......_ __. _. __.. , ._.. _ _.. _.... . N construchon Pads. _ __.._ __ ;_ ....... _ __ ,_._ _... . _._ . Footnotes.. . .... _.. _.. _ 1 Waters of the U,S, in inland areas Inland nvers streams lakes ponds, and welhnds _.. ., _. 2 NaviQable..Waters. waters that..are.su6ject,to the ebb and flow ol Ihe.tide and.Federally designated navigable rivers (the Merrimack ,_ Rrver Conneclicut Rrver and Charles River to the Walertown Dam in Massachusetts) _, 3.. Speaal..Aquallc._Sites Include wetlands and salt..marsh mudllats and vegetated shallows (see (5) below) 4 .BoaUnp.Facilitles..,.. Facllities that,provide rent or sell mooring..space, such._as marinas, yacht clubs boat clubs, ... ... ... boa).yards.,_town facilities dockominwms,...etc __ .................. .. 5.. Vegetated.Shallows .Subtidal areas Ihat support.rooted aquatic.vegetaUon such, as eelgrass .. _ __..__ _ _ .... . . . .......... __ .. ;_....... ._ ....._ _ _. . __ . __..... ., ...._....... . :i _._...._._. .. ._ ......_ ......... ...... __..__... _,_ _ ;_ .__ __ _ _ _ .... ..._ ......_... . ........_....... _........__.... ..i__......_ __..._.. ................_ . _........_ ..�;:_....... .__._... .____. .._....._. ._.....:;..... ......_....... ........_.... . . ........... ..... .... �. _...._ .__ _ . _. _ ; .., .. _ __ i_.._ _.... ._....__ ._ _. _... ....__ _......._ ....._. ....... : ........_ _ _..... _ _ ,:...... ... __ . _........._ _.. _...._.. __ . _ _. ..... _.. ...... ...... _. _ _ _...... ...... . ... ... ..... . .......................... �_ i: ... .........._. ............. . . ...._......... ........... ._._._. ........... ._....... .L_..... ..._.......... ,__. ..... ,.........__.... � ... ......... .... ................_........................ ;�:. , �. . �C�;'. � � ,r' ,, ,� �;;Yy .� ,�;;'. h�>��ti+,S�.�� , , . , � .w:i7,�''�. T. _�_ � : 'T 'V 'M�Ir.Y..rn?'i � . - . . . - '- � , . " ' ' ' , . p , � � ' . � . ' . ..�� Federai Navigatior� Projects in Massachuse�s �=�* :�:: `?s :� �:T:': - �� Merrimack River �` NEW HAMPSHIRE � � Newburyport Harbor } - � Ipswich River _ _ � Essex River —Sandy Bay �ockport Harbor& Pigeon Cove Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River Island End River � geverly Harbor A:!an:ic Malden River —� Salem Haroor Ocecn Mystic River 1 Lynn Hart�or < Mt1SSACHLJSETTS T--Winthrop Harbor BOSTON �Bosfon Harbor Dorches,er Bay and Neponszt Riv2r \ i Cohasset Harbor ?rovincetown Weymouth Fore Weymouth \Hingham Harbor �a�Q� & Town Rivers Back River Scituate Haroor ' � � Wellfleet Duxbury Harbor � Green Harbor Harbor Kingston Harbor - — —� P!ymouth Haroor � Pieasani . � ButtermilkBay /Bay \ Cape Cod Canai � ( Wareham Harbor C�e CoC 8�? � Ne�•� Bedford 8� �,�,, � Fairhaven Harbor c' Taunton River a° Fall River Harbor Sesuit Harbor Stage Harbor Red Brook Harbor RHODE �o"�7)` , �aa / Andrews River �� I t�; Hyannis Harbor ISLAND 6"9 Falmouth Harbor �\ �° �Little Harbor Pollock Rip � Woods Hole Harbor Shoals �� Lagoon Pond�Cross Rip Shoals n � Martha's ° Westport River J/ ' Vineyard Cuttyhunk Harbor�j� / � Nantucket Harbor Canapitsit Channe) Edgartown Harbor p Vineyard Haven Harbor / Menemsha Creek Nantucket Olock Islnn�l Soiu:.1 ir;� � �cHisrr � � � �� GIILF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ', ENVIRONMENiAL CONSUI,i1NG SERVICES 204 LAFAYETTE STREET AuguSt 14, 1995 SALEM, MA 01970 (508) 745-6618 � � .4.. FAX (508) 741-8648 I Mr. William Luster AU�S � �. IyYJ ' Salem Planning Director ', One Salem Green �:ic�6�'Yio C��c,ryp�ue� y,yp;P�, � � � Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Luster: I have reviewed a copy of the August 9, 1995 letter submitted on behalf of the applicant Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., which responds to the comments prepazed by Gulf of Maine , Research Center, Inc. on July 19, 1995. This letter will summarize the adequacy of the responses ��, as they apply to each issue. 1. Inclusion of Remediation Acrions in Norice of Intent The applicant has acknowledged that a portion of the property is a Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)Location To Be Investigated(LTBI#3- 3319). Remediation of the soil (soil excavation and treatment) is indicated as being necessary, however, since the portion of the site to be remediated is located in the City of Peabody it is the Peabody Conservation Commission which has jurisdicuon over any remedial activities which will take place within the resource azeas. 2. The Need for Additional Filin,g Fees Since no remediarion is andcipated in the Salem portion of the Site pursuant to the GZA July 14, 1993 report, the NOI dces not need to be amended and no additional fee will be reqL:red. 3. Presence of Land Subject to Tidal Activity The applicant has acknowledged the presence of Land Subject to Tidal Activity but since there will be no adverse impact to this wetland resource azea, no further work is required. 4. The Presence of Federal Wetlands on the Property Gulf of Maine scientists inspected the property with Paul Sommer on 26 July, 1995, and discovered the abandoned railroad spur(rails and ries) under 6-12 inches of silt and wetland vegetation. There appeazs to be less than 5000 squaze feet of Federal Wetland on the property which makes the project eligible for automauc approval under a Programaric General Permit fmm the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An individual 401 Water Quality Certification application would not be required under the revised Water Quality Regulations provided the specifications under 314 CMR 9.03 (1) are met. : GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. 5. Description of Natural Fluctuation in the Water Elevation of the North River at the Site Vanasse Hangen Brusdin Ina (VHB) has provided information on July 20 and August 4, 1995 which adequately describes the North River flood impacts and the effects of various intensity storms on the site. 6. Informarion on the Pro�osed Point Source Dischazgg Modifications to the proposed Outlet Culvert have been noted. The new Outlet Culvert is proposed as 6 feet wide and 1 foot high, which is considered to be of sufficient size to , conduct flow from a 10 year storm. Stormwater from a lazger srorm will pool on portions of the site until the North River recedes and the water drains from the site into the canal. 7. Mitigating Measures A summary of performance standazds for Wedand Resource Areas at the site and the means of ineeting them iu the proposed projec[ was provided as Exnibit 3 on July 20, i995 by Sommer Environmental Technologies Inc.. Information submitted by VHB on August 4, 1995 addresses the operation of the gas and oil sepazators during major storm and flooding events. This information is adequate. 8. Environmental Impact Statement Land: The land involved in the remediarion activities is located in the City of Peabody, and,therefore, under the jurisdicrion of the Peabody Conservation Commission. Water and Wetlands: Additional information was submitted by VHB on July 20, 1995 in Exhibits 1 and 2 and in Attachments A, B, and C on August 4, 1995. These new data address the concems raised in the July 19, 1995 Gulf of Maine letter. 9. Drainage Calcularions Informarion requested regazding drainage calcularions has been provided and these drainage calculations should be signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer. 10. Volume Calculations The volume calculations should be signed and stamped by a registered professional engineer. 11. Resource Area Descri t� ions Under 314 CMR 9.00, federal non-state wetlands should be shown on the plans submitted with the Norice of Intent, even though no further pemutdng acuon is required. This area should be referenced on the plan. Although additional information on the Outlet Culvert was provided by VHB in Exhibit 1, mitigating measures to pmtect the resource areas Inland Bank and Land Under Water during the installadon of the Outlet Culvert should be provided. 12. Wildlife Habitat Evaluations No addirional information required. _ , . , GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at the letterhead address or phone number. Sincerely, Hugh F. ulligan,Ph.D.,LSP Director 1. . EXHIBIT Commomvenith of Massactiu<rus � � D��/s�on t�f _ _ . ` F�sh�'ies�rW�Idl�fe Wayne F. MacCallum, ►7ircaor � � , 15 July 25 , 1995 Mr_ Paul F. Somttie= 5ommer Environmental Te�hnolog=es, tn�.. G5 New Salem Strec�t Wakefield, MA 018&0 Dear Mr_ Sommer= As requested in your l.etter of 1� July 1995 , Z revie�ded the DFW files on the North Rivcr. Ther� is no recozd of the Nortti River having been surveyed for fishories by Yhe Division. It is not a stocked trout stream. I suggest you a.l�o cnr,cacT t.h� Oivision of Murine Fisheries . : Si e�ely��,-. , ��'!;,' I< nneth R_ Simtnons Ph .b. uatic Biologist ....,.,, . Ficld Hcadyu:irccn . . CJnc Rabbi[ [=iil1 Road. Wcs�borc�ugh. Mas�achusc[ts O1�81 � (til)H) 79?-7270 . An Ag<n�a'ol�hr DcC:rtm�enc nf fishctiu, u'�ildlil��t� Ens'ifonn:cnql I.a�e EnWK�mrnc , , Yanasse Hangen Bne.rtlin. Inc. . � 'I'ranspurts�iun . � Wnd Drcelopmen[ Environm<n[al�ervices �� l01 Walnu[ 5[[ee[ � Pwt Office Box)151 Watrnn�vn � Sl�ssachusc[a 0327? C1-J?i I'S0 p PA.Y 617`)?i ??tl6 . f7E��B��D May 24, 1996 MQT Q � '�� I aef.: osasa.zs ��em POa�azng ��pZ. Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Regional Engineer for Resource Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 10 Commerce Way Wobum, MA 01801 Re: Proposed Stop &Shop Peabody/Salem, Massachusetts DEP File#55� � D �e#64-238 Dear Mc Lor : Enclosed is supplemental information that was requested by DEP in a letter dated May 6, 1996. The DEP letter requested information with regard to the i�fiRration calculations. construction , details and mainte�ance of the proposed detention basin, and construction sequencing. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) has reviewed the commeM letter by Aansom Environmental Consultants, Inc. pertaining to the previously submitted infiltration system calculations and offer the following responses. VHB converted the in-field percolation rate of 8 minutes/inch to 0.12 gallons/square feeUminute utifizing the conversion table provided in "Procedure for Design of Structures for Stormwater Runoff"prepared by the Town of Barnstable Engineering Department. A copy of the procedure is attachedforyourreview. The so-called "Barnstable Method"is utilized for sizing stormwater infiltration systems to be placed in soils with percolation rates less than 10 minutes/inch and is used by other municipalities as well. The design method takes into account saturated soil conditions by requiring presoaking of the soils as is done in soil testing for Title 5 septic systems. The percolation rate is determined from the total time for the water level to drop from four(4)to one (1) inch in the test hole. To further ensure the prolonged life of the system, a clogging factor of 50% is calculated in the design of the infiltration system. Afthough this method appears relatively simple compared to the Horton Equation suggested by Ransom Environmental Consultants, VHB has previously compared the resuRs of the Barnstabie Method with other analysis methods, namely Bouwer and Aice (1976), Hourslev (1951) and Darcey's Equation and found the resuRs to be comparative. The conversion factor for gallons to cubic feet was incorrectly noted in the analysis, however, the resufts of the calculations are correct. \\VULCAN\wINDUwS\o7814\LEffERS\REQREN4.WC � . L_ � Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Project No.: 03834 May 24, 1996 Page 2 Attached is a copy of a section through the detention basin. Please note that the basin bottom is below the groundwater IeveL The basin is designed as a permanent wet basin with a retained volume equal to 1/2"of runoff from the tributary area. The bottom of the basin will consist of twelve (12) inches of organic soils to support the proposed vegetative community. The basin bottom material will consist of loam containing not less than 5% nor more than 20%organic matter mixed at a ratio of 3:1 with peat moss. The loam may be topsoil stripped from the site if it meets the organic requirements, and shall be free from large (2" or larger) cobbles, roots, old sod, trash, wood, or other contaminants. VHB suggests that the maintenance plan for the proposed wet basin follow the guidelines preseMed in "Controlling Urban Runoff:A Practical Manual for Planning and Designing Urban BMPs"by Thomas R. Schueler, specifically: • The side-slopes and embankment must be mowed twice a year to prevent woody growth and control weeds • The basin should be inspecied twice a year during wet weather to determine if the basin is functioning as originally intended. Inspectio� priorities include checking the side-slopes for si ns of erosion or instabili the condition of the outlet and em r nc il g ty, e ge y sp Iway, accumulation of sediment, clogging of the outlet and the adequacy of the upstream and downstream channels. Corrective measu�es such as regrading and revegetation may be required. ' • Debris and litter should be hand removed from the surrounding area and pond surface on a weekly basis. The following is a basic construction sequencing plan for the project. The actual order of tasks to be undertaken may vary slightly due to unforeseen circumstances such as overiy wet soils condflions or due to the time of year construction is allowed to start. • Construction will be sequenced such that a minimum amount of area will be disturbed at any one time. • Prior to the start of any work on the site, the contractor shall instali all sedimentation and erosion control measures, including a stabilized construction entrance per the plans and specifications. • The proposed wet basin at the rear of the site shall be constructed early in the process and shall be utilized as a sedimem basin du�ng construction. • Oniy trees and vegetation within the limits of work shall be removed, ail other vegetation will be protected during construction. • Materials that are stociq�iled on site, such as stripped topsoil, shall be surrounded by haybales to prevem siltation of downgradient areas. \\WLl'eW\WINDO WS\03836\LETfERS\REQRFSP3.DlX: 11 111J Mr. Sabin M. Lord, Jr. Project No.: 03834 May 24, 1996 Page 3 • As the new drainage system is installed, the structure inlets shall be protected to prevent sediment from entering the system and the wetland areas. • All disturbed areas shall be brought to grade as soon as practicable and receive loam and seed or asphaR binder course to stabilize the surface. • Erosion control measures shall remain in place untii all areas of the site are stabilized and I permission to remove them is received from the Conservation Commissio�. if you have any questions o�the enclosed materials or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (617) 924-1770. Very truly yours, V SSE A BRUSTLIN, INC. r ichael E. c eice, P.E. Senior Project Manager Enclosure , cc (w/ enclosures): R. Freed, DEP Northeast Region - Peabody Conservation Commission �Salem Conservation Commission, M. McKnight, Stop & Shop L. Frank, Stop R Shop , J. Serafini, Serafini, Serafini & Darling R. Davis, Goulston & Storrs C. Crealese, GZA W. DiMento, DiMento & DiMento R. Talkington, Ransom Environmentai Consultants, Inc. � \\VULI'AN\WWWWS\078.M\LEI'IFRS\REQRESP7.00l' FROM Town of Barnsta6le . .• - TOWN OF BARNSTABLE ' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT , PROCEDURE FOR DESIGN OF STRUCTURES ' FOR STORM WATER AUNpFF DRAINAGE REQQIR£MENTS I 1.0 Drainaqe systests shall be designed to contain all stozm vater zunroff oa the lot. 2.0 A sample leaching system calculation is herewith pravided to aid the system design_ The Eolloaiag procedure illusuates a method of desiga which is acceptable to the Towa of Barastabla. This method is not meant to be restrictive. Other methods and values of in- Eiltration rates may be ssed providing aa explanation of the procedure aad jnstification o£ the valnes accompanies the calculatioas and is acceptable to the Enqineering Depazttaent. ' 2.1 Drai.naqe areas and estimated storm runoff: (1) Drainage areas shall be delineated on a topographic plan showing existing and proposed contours at an , interval sufficient to detezmine the requized areas . and slopes. � (2) Runof£ coefficients shall be as follows: Surface Slope C Residential. lots 0-38 .35 3-8$ .45 88 and above .55 Paved or other impervious 0-38 .9p . 3-8$ .95 88 and above 1.00 Parks, Golf courses, etc 0-3$ .10 3-88 .ZS 8& axd above .35 Runoff coefficients for composite areas shall be com- puted by Weiq2ited average methods as shown below: � � C1A1 + CZA2 + C3A3 +..• . ave + A + A + . - A1 2 3 . . . . where CdVe = Averaqe C value £or Area C1 = C Value for Area 1 . A_ � Area 1. in Acres . FROM Town af Barnsta6le 3.0 The rainfall intensity (I) shall be determined by using the Rainfall Intensity curves attached. Starting at the left of the curve, the distance is the greatest , measured distance of water runoff fzom the hi h est 9 to the lrnaest elevation. Plot a horizontal Iine from tize appropriate distance to the 8 slope (8 slope is the drop in elevation divided by the distance times 100) . F=� the appropriate 8 slope, plot a line vertically.downward until it intersects the C Value curve; thence plot a line horizontall and to Y the, right until it intersects the ap- propriate design stozm recurreiyce interval curve; theace plot a liae vertical2y downward to rainfall intensity (IN/FiR) . 4.0 The Design Stozm Recurrence Interval shall be 20 years, Peak rates of rnnoff shall be as calcuiated by the zational raethod: 4 = C=a wheze Q = cubic feet/sec. C = run-off coeffzcient - 'I = rainfal,l intensity (in/hr) A = drainage azea (acres) 5.0 Soils invesLigations and average infiltration rates: -, (1) A standard percolation test shall be perEozmed zn a test pit at the elevation of the bottom o£ proposed leachinq system. Suf£icient data in the form of soil logs shall be presented which is representative of soil conditions in the project area. Test pits shall show soil constituents to a minimum of 12' below existing ground elevation, and shall indicate the Ievel of ground Water if encountered. Additional percolation tests shall be performed at proposed leaching system locations where soil conditions shov marked differ- ences from the initial test. (2) Percolation tests shall be conducted in th e manner • prescribed in the Massachusetts Sanitary Code ' FR�1 Taun of Barnstable ' � Title 5, I977. Znterpretation oE the test and recommended average in£iltratioa values are as followse ia? Total time for the water level drop from four to one inch in the test hole shall be recorded_ (b) The average drop in minntes per ineh and the allowable average ingil.tration rate in sg. ft. per gallon per minute is as fol7.ows: Averaga drop AllowablQ inf3ltraticn min/inch . rate, aal/sf/min. > 2-� _5 4 .25 6 .17 8 .12 10 ' SA�PLB CALCIJLATIOtPS 6.0 GIVEN; Flow path distance = 250 ft. SI.OpE = 2$ Paved Surface Area = 12,200 ftZ Stosm recurrence interval = 20 yrs. Perc. rate > 2 min/in; from table, infiltration = .5 gal/ft2/min. `� FIND: Leaching azea required for. project site. ST£P 1 From table for. paved surface, � s].ope of 28, "C" _ .90 STEP 2 with flvw path distance of 250 ft. , enter rainEall intensity curves on chart. Follos+ example arrows to 2� slope thence to coefficient of .90, thence to fre— quency of Zo yeazs, thence to 5.5 in/hr rainfall intensity. STEP 3 CaSculate as follows: Q = CIA = CFS (ft'/sec. ) ' with C ID .90 Z = 5.5 in/hr s A = 12,200 ft' Q = .90 x 5.5 x 12,200 ft= = 1.39 CFS 43,560 ft=/acre Convert 1.39 CFS to CFM t£t'/mzn) 1.39 x 60 sec/min = 83.4 ft'/min , FROM Town or' Barnstahle STEP 4 � Calculate leaching area as follo�+s: Given: Q = 83.4 ft'/min �, .5 gal/ft�/min infiltzation rate 7.48 gal/ft' conversian factor Area tPt' ) = Q x 7.48/.5 Where Q = 83.4 ft'/mi.n = 83.4 ft' x �.48 g.aTl a 1 min £t .S ga3 _ ftT su'n s zn£iltratioa area = 124�.7 ft= , STEP 5 . The desiqn of each dra£aage systee� shall include solid catch basins as ihe first point of entry for storm aater. Each catcII basi.n shall include a 22" diameter 16 gage corrugated aluminum trap leadi.ng to a leaching trench or leaching pit. See attached sheets .for typical system components: • '` 201.4.0 Solid Basin �91.5.0. Catch B,asin F.;ame 201..6.1 Catch Basin Grate 205.1.1 L.Qaching Basin �� 05.1.2 Leaching Trench 201.I2.1 Catch Basin Trap The above mentioned sheets are pazt .of the Town af Barnstable DPW Construction Standards and Specifications, and specify dimensions and types of material Lo be used Eor the dzainage systems. OTHER 1. Curbing shall be in compliance with the Sown of Barnstable DPW Construction Standards. 2. Paved Parkinq s Drivevay areas shall have a Sub-Base and Bituminous pavement thickness as specified in the Town o£ BarnsLable Planning Board Rules 6 Requlations, and shall be applied in accordance with TOWn DPN Specifications. Both documents aforementioned are available at the respective Town offices. � _ . , - . o , - � . • _ -- .� . T • � � / / Q �/ / j o . // / : z �/� a : pE . � o E � , � /� � Y °1�' � / � r ' '� � OOf x tr1 ,' 11f � /aA s / � �� • « � z ro �� . /�� " r s �, �// �� R / � /0� • ZLI t1�LpZ ' / / / �' 9 y 00£ � �� '. �Y �� \/ "u w/�/ / ./�� q � � . . �o / ./ // / D� oob ' �� e I1 , I . � / � / � . �// , 005 ' 6 oa9 . ' ' � / � �//�/�/ _ v . , Na'6t47RMv�B 052fl96i1�B � � � - . � � OVERFLOW SPILLWAY .. . . ELEVATION=8.9' � SWALE AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT � � SLOPE�.008� 8 PLANTED WITH RICE CUTGRASS � . . � � HIGH GHOUNDWATER EL.EVATION=7.0' . 7 8 2 2 � �� . . . . � � . .. 5 4 I 3 � 2 . . 12'MANUFACTURED ORGANIC SOIL � SIDES AOID 80TTOM OF WEf BASIN PLANTED � � � PER L4NDSCAPE PLAN . � 1 - 0 � � . � . � . � . SECTION THROUGH WET BASIN . � - - � NOT TO SCALE � � PROPOSED SUPER STOP&SHOP , PEABODYSALEM - WET BASIN � . Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy&Environmental Affairs � Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional �ffice•205B Lowell Street, Wilmington MA 01887•978-694-3200 �EVAI L�TRICK��; F�� MAEVE VALLELY BARTI.E7T Goyerno �� lY; , SecreWry � ' �, � - �AVID W.GASH � ��,.-r !'� ..�,f�4 Commissianer D;:;..:;. . ;��.�„ :•�IIJ(31 cor��:,�,,,. , ::,_��a.vPr��r: � November 20,2014 Stop and Shop Supermazket Company,LLC RE: WETLANDS/PEABODY/SALEM c/o Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. DEP File#s: 055-0369 and 064-0238 101 Walnut Street,P.O.Box 9151 19 Howley Street Watertown,MA 02471-9151 ' Attn: Mr. Conor Nagle,P.E. Deaz Sir/Madam: The Northeast Regional Office of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, « „ Wetlands Pro am MassDEP reviousl issued gr ( ), p y , �n August 25, 1��7,tw� Surerseling/Fina1 Ordcrs of Conditions("SOC"),referenced above, issued pursuant to M.G.L. a 131, § 40,the Wetlands Protection Act("WPA"or"Act") and the Wetlands Regulations promulgated pursuant there to at 310 CMR 10.00("WPA Regulations"). Based.on as-built plans submitted and a site inspection conducted on : November 5,2014,MassDEP has determined that the construction of a supermarket, parking lot,drainage � system and associated grading and utilities authorized by the two SOCs has been completed in accordance with the SOCs. Therefore,MassDEP is issuing the enclosed Certificates of Compliance(COC)for the two SOCs finding the following: Complete Certification:It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions hos been satisfactorily completed. Please note that the COCs contain continuing conditions. These include multiple requirements for maintaining the on-site stormwater management systems. During the November 5, 2014 site inspection,MassDEP staff observed that the stormwater BMPs located on the property have not been maintained in accordance with the continuing conditions of the SOCs. Therefore MassDEP is issuing a Notice of Non-compliance,under separate cover,outlining requirements to bring the site into compliance. Pursuant to 310 CMR 10.05(9)(fl of the Regulations,this COC shall be recorded in the Land Court or Registry of Deeds,whichever is appropriate, and certification of recording shall be sent to this office. This information is availa6le in alternate format.Call Michelle Waters-Ekanem,Diversity Director,at 617-292-5757.TDD#1•866-539-7622 or 7-617-574-6868 MassDEP Website:www.mass.gov/dep , . Printed on Recycled Paper , - If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Jill Provencal at 978-694-3250 or jill.provencal@state.ma.us. Sincerely, ��-�� RachelFreed Acting Deputy Regional Director MassDEP-NERO cc: Peabody Conservation Commission Salein Conservation Commission Stop and Shop Supermazket Company, LLC Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands _ �eP F;ie N�mee�: WPA FOr'm 8A — Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 064-0238 ' � Provided by DEP A. Project Information Important: When filling out 1. Tliis Certificate of Compliance is issued to: forms on the Stop and Shop Supermarket Company computer, use Name only the tab key to move c/o Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc. yoUf CUfSof- Mailing Address � do not use the Watertown MA 02471 retum key. City/Town State Zip Code .dl.., I I 2. This Certificate of Compliance is issued for work regulated by a final Order of Conditions issued to: �V-51 � S�and Shop Supermarket Company Name `� August 22 1997 064-0238 Dated � DEP File Number 3. The project site is located at: Boston Street, Salem Salem Street Address � Citylfown 16 0374-0 Assessors Map/Plate Number. . Parcel/Lot Number . the final Order of Conditio�s was recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: ' Stop and Shop Supermarket � Property Owner(if different) . � Essex (Southern District) 14402 434/442 � County Book - Page . Cedifcate - � � 4. A site inspection was made on: November 5, 2014 Date B. Certification Check all that apply: � Complete Certifcation: It is hereby certified that the work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions has been satisfactorily completed. ❑ Partial Certification: It is hereby certified that only the following portions of work regulated by the above-referenced Order of Conditions have been satisfactorily completed.The project areas or work subject to this partial certification that have been completed and are released from this Order are: wpaform8b.doc•DEP Addresses•rev.11I6/14 Page 1 of 3 I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection � Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands �eP F�ie N�mbe�: I WPA Form 8A — Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 064-0238 ' �+ Provided by DEP B. Certification (cont.) ❑ Invalid Order of Conditions: It is hereby certified that the following work regulated by the above- referenced Order of Conditions never commenced. The Order of Conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid. No future work subject to regulation under the Wetlands Protection Act may commence without filing a new Notice of Intent and receiving a new Order of Conditions. � Ongoing Conditions: The following conditions of the Ortler shall continue: (Include any conditions contained in the Final Order, such as maintenance or monitoring that should continue for a longer period). ICondition Numbers: ' #12, #35, #37, #38, #39, #40 and#41 C. Authorization Issued b : Y �f Rachel Freed, Acting Depury Regional Director- BRP I�D�I. 20, ?AI4 � Department of Environmental Protection Regional Offce Date of Issuance , This Certificate must be signed by the Section Chief or his designee and a copy sent to the applicant. Signature: ��A�'iLwC'i7�— Acting Deputy Regional Director wpaPofineb.tloc•�EP Addresses•rev.11/6/14 � Page 2 of 3 I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ' � Bureau of Resource Protection -Wetlands DEP File Number: WPA Form 8A — Certificate of Compliance Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 osa-o23s - Provided by DEP D: Recording Confirmation The applicant is responsible for ensuring that this Certificate of Compliance is recorded in the Registry of Deeds or the Land Court for the district in which the land is located. Detach on dotted line and submitto the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office (see address information on next page) To: �----- --------------�--- - -� ------�-�--- - ----- --- NERO 205B Lowell Street Wilminqton MA 01887 DEP Regional Office Please be advised that the Certificate of Compliance for the project at: Boston Street, Salem, MA 064-0235 � Pro�ed Locahon DEP File Number - Has been recorded at the Registry of Deeds of: Essex(Southern District) County For: Propedy Owner . . and has been noted in the chain of title of the affected property on: Date Book Page If recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this transaction is: If registered land, the document number which identifies this transaction is: DocumentNumber � SignatureofApplicant _ � wpaform9b.tloc•DEPAtldresses•rev.tl/6A4 � Page 3 ot 3 � i r �SW��inthinksc opld;,beahome`to �,�'�vtd2�d�byFea`body „�,�}�y;,� �'�between�Bri ge°�a�,e om ' ` � �,thesecondaryptreatmentplan4aq��'P* �� it � ,`rst�eets ''�?+�a`,�� r'� �. � �fTh'"�thte'eMnen�'�gree�'some�or�'��hmk�i�s ta�goodtu epof the �J�.'��In 1 o ngkat some,�'�ot �HIBIT ; , all of the dedelopment could go�a �,£prop,.e�Y,�2I,t��`abUts��resideritial,'�ondaryt;eatmentiPlaritst� � � . ,nlon�!�va,�y�t��ard�.transformmg an �quses;so''another residenttal use is` enhance these ,ar"eas .;�, i , k�eyeso�e�pi�lt a:thidg ofobeauty ��co� 'Ly61e� �^'4� ri' ^ � �f f " Ii�' il a:, ��'BUt�th'�Ce"�i��'some�d�sagreement ke pvr . r(federal�officials)a',�tallun f , � ^, ^ �• � `1 ��^'�� `��"i McSwi�gin"is proposing that`�spending;millions�os`�'�do �' boui�w`hat wo ld be be�t , i ,,k � B t t *�r � N , , � �+ �,K „ �,� �, � I 5 lv� e sr`��'i�4`+�'��t�tSs,�k� .i�e�m�'as�� tis.cr+v�.ae-n+ s. �, 4 . :,r i�. � �i '� �" » Rh:° ' �"c `�4�� .i3n " ±^"�Y ✓ ,�'Yu� Y�'��.„,�, x '7i#'�'c*�fi��aF.� �� . s ,�r i � J � � � ;� `Y pc`� �� Y �4`�c r � r r it 3 't!J ' � t �; '�'�� ' �,. 3 �* , �'M��6 ♦ �.'x� � 1 x .1"-�'t �'fl ; d4 .� Ts'�p 4efi�7 1' �{y4D �rWyi� � � x � a, �gaA.. ... j,•,Rt�,.?t `�. �1'B,Ft 4/'? Yj � ) �+Y'�. t�i �d'Fe�flr+I i�i J"- � ^ r" $� �!e �� +�'� v'iJ� N �.� ^' � t �'y�5�ta�llc_Y� �l t`�"3�.1�� .. i � 7 - r.Q-� . � � , °'` � �ri ;�Y'�� - �� .::�•�, e. .�a � ;� �; r�r�; '` x'�ti;{ . . { ;: d • .��y� g a :; �y `+c�,cr..;+ ��F,_; r,;, ;�`� �Y �-, 4. � t � ; s�i� . � ��.4 i; ,; �� , �, �: � � � ,- �, �, � � �; �` i� ' � ��` � `` � �� ._� r � ii , ', ' ,a �;- i : , i; ^� �a , :' �� r�,;q . ,�, �, , ;, ��l � � � '? � � � ��{ i �t` �i. ��N < - "+ .. �� L�y �� .a. �n.a4rtc r� rrR i>�aT +.� A .f wefu tmi t 4+�a 11 3 ^t�is.F �t£d � : � Thet:'NorthrRlve'r,canal:runa��eslde�Ha��ony�Gro've Cemete�andtraiiroad.trecks�In�this�afea�wf�ere� MlcliaelN Hariln lon ho es td bulld reaftlen�laf buildl� S � Th�9a/em Neme�x�. waib..:o�a . 9 P. �,�• 3:�p � t .�h 9 ;d {H ttdl�` iY, !Sn �'�1i� L�'� vn�RC( �� h {4;I � � ti�a r 257,•eP,a2�¢'.,pe^i'^.h r K i.a��t�a"f�`�� r�."+�[st+�R s��14 '�'" x t4 (�3 j�3 '� dl�k c x � � � �� 1 s. -�,��3,�s sStcw3'�,.SkRtuz�l�rk ar Pr.xas�tj"� (c��it�s�'4tis+ roi\ TG ` °�' i , �, 'b � 1 i'�i :. ) 1F(� t . � lt Y Yt � � 1YYS � } �Y �W: [�,@(t�YR`l�,�o��r ��s.y�ty fn,'�"�Awro�� a � t`a+t ,!{i 'Ne s+CiF �qj�* t�' F Ij � j-. e �� ; i�n�yrt � `l�n��,��ia��n��inr��pr�oY,e R � ��tg�i�� +`� i ,5'� ,a!Fb�,,y�'�k� �Ar If�C �rY. < i `}�' , ��'r�da1Y�!tl'k I�Gu'7r(.�Y' � -rt'nH J -{`C,��rs��;�,c ?. 4'1 f:(; � b:'k�t(��uc�1 ��`� � ,¢YM1�}�lRR�i'ti� 6sft3d4iafi�l�F�C�A4�r��♦ .,E ., �; �- � : SALEM,,,, Lori Engt'and,John� :,:,, ' " � • ,�know;if it ,should be homes�,a + Jeffers,}want someth�ngad'o"ne with y=� i g '' 'waste.treatmentplant�or�light.in-� 4. ,' 3tie;iNqrtlidRivert�pioper,Cy�upon�`s ��`. �'�,, dustry. ' ° Harcln to of� � I�,have ic uces�of four�'feettof.; which, M�chae�,�J�,� n g 4 �� water;m that area,�,`Jeffer`s"said,� Be�erly is,piopoSing to€bmld�gn ,t.� n , r , ,�pat'tn�ent,�Complex� g'�hey,y��u�t,�h� �adding,in his,40'yearss�+'oeking in• ' +' � rµfirenitl�u�e�what,�r,�,�,rb��?�*"�,x +t6effam alumtier.g�l,Wluchthe', 4' � c�ti.'i�tas�gross :¢Eng,�2.};�of�78Rr � �`*�aT e�elowt ooda 'teast20timese. � ��Beayer�St t:saidgas she loo,ket(�out��y, it� ,. �M �r. �.�<. � �? ,�}�s�he,iHarrmgton) �oing � ,�oyer,�the�siz-acre;�site�from��the ;q-' � s � � driveway�of„her,home..,�;Did you _.r , - A to�;put res�dence's`,�mr�fh"ere �It` see,all the tcash down there�Any k;r •' "]ia'sn'E:floode�for awhiie liut, iC �'t =4- -I owried a umt there and�,parked, thing down,there,would be an�im , �# m-�—�- �as_{�iere I'wouldn t�want to' , Provement ar�rr; 3�. � F « <,, . t �- :Eng said.she andy,her�husband�� aTi ve it 17ood JetFers said. � " S `Steven�`„t4eqd'ently�'see�[people r� A�,^'�cskS� w atkti@wouldp�efer'foc„ ` di�mpm"g�)tThkin°the'area�'At�tha �� _��,, ��;�. �ythe sited�Jr�Tfers�sazd 'R'ttyth4°ng� 1 'sbottom�of�the*tull ni�ning down �° f u down�:here to gi've the city of Sa,� r�ft�om h�'er�pcopert� arexlumber_y.`° `�`� `�;� lem a*better taicxbase �s`an'�im` � �cra pes�old?ttires�a d�ddiscarded ';�j�� , �u�rt��sL•ORI ENGzntr us�s. provetnent�But look at thezad .� 1 " .window ttaaies"��"i'�''"' � � �g; ��p , - verse s�de If you put apactments; � s�+,�4��z., .�.* aw¢w�a�,� F,e�. s gross �, �.�:,r tn there where are the�lud"s gomg; �,The site�is�als�home+to a pesky •�,,{ , �„,��;x a� , s,� wx r � c8t.��hay.e�this�big��at�i � ,Jet�'er�s,� a�Peabody resident ,�to go to'school�,If you putla treat � ooks e`ar�ca�tifHe cuns around �:�k`�,',hor oryns�,$effers�Lumber,�Corp x ment�plant,there;you,re gomg to ; � . a �- , � on`Bos�on Street is equally con ``hav`eFto;hput;it:on�sEilts'or you 11; �ere�8tt�jlnight�,I�e�s 3�alre�dy� ; 1'+ , i.� r Xa S+� o� c 1 i 3 y <yn� .r,w� e+, y *"m+ f "`grabbedronto my�,husbandis�leg ��vineed�Something sliould�be�done habe.crap pourm�, out�}of�fhe. � t�j, s ,n w�th t�`e a ea He,;�ust doesnt rch�mneys � � � , 7L011C0 �p�} � . ., p � i.� f �w � S. S�' � ;�Bt y P �'tu i : s� e �t &' ,x` �e - . . . '*p�. �.� � K3 �.��)1�'�aY��41ra �,Y"Y� T P � .. �"s� .i r �� u:�+«muss.rir�e:.ow ,wm.a�,inxeemHaMe��.��5��.) " .; 5 s�. f ' '�V . � .. . ` .0...-. -.1T ��{ ��1 Mt ( � . . _ `�, � �� L. . �mc '� r x"�:'. ,.w'_�.._ ��.m ' r .�L2.. .'4y'� � .�. ' . .� ' � . . . � ' � � .' � �� ' � S:� EXHIBIT SOMMER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. � � 9 65 NE WAKEFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS OI880 � - TELEPHONE (617) 246-5360 September 14, 1995 Mr. Frederick J. Harney, Jr. , Chairman Conservation Commission ° City of Salem one Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Boston and Howley Street, Salem / Stop and Shop Fifty Foot Buffer Dear Chairman Harney: The Salem Conservation Commission has raised the issue of requiring a uniform 50 ft. buffer the length of the project adja- cent to the North River. It is our opinion that the increase from approximately 30 ft to 50 ft would not provide any additional benefit to the protection of the interests of the Wetland Protec- tion Act or the Salem By-law. The existing 30 ft buffer consists of an active railroad track bed and disturbed urban upland. No evidence of important habitat or resource areas have been identi- fied within this area. Generally a buffer zone is desirable where a resource area may be potentially impacted through direct activ- ity or runoff. Since the railroad effectively isolates the North River from any potential direct impact and the proposed drainage system with curbing eliminates the possibility of site runoff occurring in this area, no additional benefit is achieved by increasing the breadth of the existing distance to the river. Please call me with any questions you may have. Very truly yours, SOMME ENTAL L E , INC. Paul F. Sommer President PFS/dan stopsho3 .mem � EXHIBIT � � r �8 1 `� 1 GIILF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 204 LAFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 (508) 745-6618 September 14, 1995 FAX (508) 741-8648 William Luster Salem Ciry Planner One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Stop and Shop Project Review Deaz Mr. Luster: At your request, I have reviewed the Salem Conservadon Commission suggesrion that a 50 foot 'no disturb zone' be provided between the Stop & Shop project and the North River. In order for the Stop & Shop project to comply with the Conservauon Commission suggestion, some of the proposed parking would have to be moved. The Massachusetts Wedand Protection Act(M.G.L. 131, s.40) provides for a Buffer Zone which is defined in the Wedands Regulations (310 CMR 10.04) as follows: ' "The Buffer Zone means that area of land extending one hundred (100) feet horizontally outward from the boundary of any area specified in 310 CMR 10.02 (1)(a)." Within the Buffer Zone of the Stop & Shop project, activities which may alter a resource area can be limited through an Order of Conditions when such limits aze necessary to protect the interests of the Wedands Protecdon Act. The performance standards which must be maintained to protect the interests of the Act for the Resource Areas which exist at the Site include: 1) the water carrying capacity of the North River channel, 2) ground and surface water qualiry, 3) the capacity of the resource areas to provide breeding habitat, escape cover and food for fisheries, 4) the capacity of the resource areas to provide important wildlife habitat functions, 5) the physical stability of the Bank, 6) compensatory flood storage volume of the Bordering Land Sub�ect to Flooding, and 7) no restricrions in flows which would cause an increase in flood stage or velocity. An Order of Conditions will be assigned to this pmject by the Salem Conservadon Commission to protect the interests of the wetland resource azeas at the site. In addidon, rainwater from the roof will be re-chazged to the ground water through infiltradon trenches, and all run-off fmm the site will receive considerable treaunent before being dischazged into the Norrh River. '� •GUIF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC. In my opinion, the requirement for a 50 foot 'no disturb zone' is not necessary for this project since it will not result in any additional protection of the interests of the Wetlands Protection Act. Sincer y, � � B �� \l' �' �.t_ ..��U Hugh F. Mulligan, PhD., L.3� Director Yanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 7'ranspotta[ion EXHIBIT IandDevelopmen[ � � �/ Emironmeotal Services � ]O] Walnu[ 5[ree[ � I Post Office Box 9151 �— Warertown Massachusetts 02272 (17 9Z4 1770 . FAX G17 924 22R6 September 13, 1995 Ref: 03834 Mr. Frederick J. Harney, Jr. Chairman, Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: Proposed Stop&Shop Supermarket Boston and Howley Streets Salem and Peabody, Massachusetts Dear Chairman Harney, This letter is in response to concerns raised by the Commission at its last meeting with regard to the effects of a fifty (50)foot setback of construction from the North River Canal resource area versus the presently designed thirty (30) foot setback at certain portions of the site. , Of the approximately 30 foot buffer, 28 feet is land not under control of the applicant. This abutting area is presently a disturbed area that contains a gravel accessway and an active railroad spur line. This unvegetated land will remain as a barrier between the project site and the North River canal regardless of the setback of the proposed work from the river. Increasing the buffer beyond thirty feet as suggested does not offer any increased protection to the resource areas as far as the drainage system or stormwater runoff is concerned. The drainage calculations presented to the Board were prepared for the plan as submitted. A change in the setback does not provide additional protection to the resource area nor does it "improve" the drainage calculation or drainage system in general. Therefore, it is our opinion that there is no increased benefit to the resource area in pursuing a 50 foot setback over the currently provided 30 foot setback from the River. Please call this office should you have any further questions or comments with regard to this project. Very truly yours, V SSE H BRUSTLIN, INC. �� I cNeice, P.E. Senior Project Manager \\SPOCK\WINDOWS\03834\LETTEftS\305E7BK.DOC EXHIBIT l� � �� 5ev��`0��??� (�i#� uf �ttlEm. ,�f{tt,�s�cl�u,�e#ts �a+' S ' �F' �¢}�ttrtment nf �uhlir �erui�es �� (�ne 3ulem (�reen 745-9595 1�Ext. 3 Zl CHARLES F.OUIGLEY City Engineer � Director of Public Services TO: Salem Conservation Commission c/o Fred Harney, Chairman FROM: Chazles Quigley, City Engineer �� RE: Stop & Shop, Howley Street DATE: September 14, 1995 I have prepazed the following memo in response to questions raised by the Conservation Commission regazding drainage for the proposed Stop & Shop on Howley Street. 1. Drainage Calculations I have conducted a detailed review of the stamped drainage calculations prepared by Eastem Land Survey, Inc. and concur that the drainage calculations show that the increase in the rate of run-off from this project will be insignificant. 2. �stem Chanees As I recommended to the Pla�ning Board in my Mazch 3, 1995 memo, Stop and Shop submitted a revised drainage plan to the Planning Boazd on May 10, 1995 which I have reviewed and approved. The plan shows the removal of the detention azea and the addition of a sepazator leading out of the compensatory storage area. As a result of these changes the system should be approved as presented. 3. Treatment Effectiveness I have reviewed and approved the proposed drainage system which includes catch basins with sedimentation sumps and oiUgrease hoods, and two (2) oil and grit sepazators. I am familiaz with the concept of the"First Flush" and I have evaluated the information supplied in a letter from VHB dated August 4, 1995, on behalf of Stop and Shop, regazding the "First Flush", and concur that the system and its structures as designed will function effectively during the "First Flush". � - ; The addition of the ro osed roof infiltration s stem will direct a roximatel 25% of P P Y PP Y roof run-off into a subsurface stormwater rechazge system and will thus decrease the volume of run-off from the site thereby creating a run-off rate equal to the pre- construction rate. In addition, the drainage as proposed will not increase the flooding in the area. 4. Maintenance I have reviewed and approve the following Best Management Practices proposed by Stop and Shop to ensure the proper operation of the drainaee facilities: winter de-icing of paved areas; location of stockpiles and pavement sweeping program; catch basin maintenance, oil and grit separator maintenance, drainage swale maintenance, and miscellaneous site maintenance. I would like to recommend that the Conservation Commission include a condition stating the maintenance schedules in the Order of Conditions. 5. Building Set-Back I have reviewed the plans and drainage calculations to determine if changing the proposed plan from a 30 foot set back to a uniform 50 foot setback from the North River Canal and thereby eliminating a row of pazking spaces would have any impact on the drainage from the site. This change would result in no appreciable decrease in the run-off from the site and I believe there is nothing significant or measurable to be gained by increasing the setback and eliminating a row of pazking. I hope that this information addresses the Commission's concerns regazding the drainage for the proposed Stop and Shop. jm\bd�slop&sho.con , w � . � STOP & SHOP NOTICE OF ZNTENT A3 FILED WITH THE SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION ON MAY 26, 1995 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1. Stop & Shop submittal through VHB dated July 20, 1995 relative to project impacts on interests protected by the Salem ' Wetlands Ordinance. Exhibit 2 . Stop & Shop submittal through Eastern Land Survey of runoff and stormwater calculations. Exhibit 3. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental , Technologies, Inc. of applicable 310 CMR Regulations and the project impact of those regulations. Exhibit 4. Gulf of Maine comment letter dated July 19, 1995. Exhibit 5. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Executive Summary of Environmental Site Evaluation. Exhibit 6. Conservation Commission Notice to Abutters dated August 9, 1995 concerning change of public hearing date to August 16, 1995. � Exhibit 7. Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. , comment letter dated July 25, 1995. Exktibit 8. Stop & Shop response letter dated July 27 , 1995 to comment letter of Ransom dated July 25, 1995 . Exhibit 9. Stop & Shop submittal through VHB dated August 3 , 1995 which includes: Attachment A "First Flush" Documentation; AttaChment B Effects of Various Storms; Attachment C Best Management Practices. Exhibit 10. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated August 7 , 1995 of wetland soil logs. Exhibit 11. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated August 7 , 1995 with attachment concerning US Army Corps of Engineers Programmatic General Permit. Exhibit 12 . Stop & Shop response dated August 9 , 1995 to the Gulf of Maine comment letter dated July 19, 1995. � Exhibit 13. Gulf of Maine comment letter dated August 14 , 1995. Exhibit 14. Stop & Shop submittal of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 's Environmental Site Evaluation dated July, 1993 as revised, October, 1994. Exhibit 15. Letter from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and wildlife dated July 25, 1995. f � . � STOP & SHOP NOTICE OF INTENT AS FILED WITH THE SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION ON MAY 26� 1995 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1. Stop & Shop submittal through VHB dated July 20, 1995 relative to project impacts on interests protected by the Salem Wetlands Ordinance. Exhibit 2. Stop & Shop submittal through Eastern Land Survey of runoff and stormwater calculations. Exhibit 3. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. of applicable 310 CMR Regulations and the project impact of those regulations. EXhibit 4. Gulf of Maine comment letter dated July 19, 1995. Exhibit 5. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Executive Summary of Environmental Site Evaluation. Exhibit 6. Conservation Commission Notice to Abutters dated August 9, 1995 concerning change of public hearing date to August 16, 1995. Exhibit 7. Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. , comment letter dated July 25, 1995. ' � � � Ext.�bit 8. Stop & Shop response letter dated July 27, 1995 to comment letter of Ransom dated July 25, 1995. Exhibit 9. Stop & Shop submittal through VHB dated August 3 , 1995 which includes: Attachment A "First Flush" Documentation; Attachment B Effects of Various Storms; Attachment C Best Management Practices. Exhibit 10. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated August 7 , 1995 of wetland soil logs. Exhibit 11. Stop & Shop submittal through Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. dated August 7 , 1995 with attachment concerning US Army Corps of Engineers Programmatic General Permit. Exhibit 12. Stop & Shop response dated August 9, 1995 to the Gulf of Maine comment letter dated July 19, 1995. Exhibit 13. Gulf of Maine comment letter dated August 14 , 1995. Exhibit 14. Stop & Shop submittal of GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 's Environmental Site Evaluation dated July, 1993 as revised, October, 1994 . Exhibit 15. Letter from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and Wildlife dated July 25, 1995. ' EXHIBIT B � PROJECf DESCRIPTION � The project consists of the development of a proposed Super Stop & Shop Supermarket and modifications to the existing Jeffers � Lwnber Corp. Facility an a 7.25 acre parcel of land located in Peabody & Salem, Massachusetts. The proposed 5uperniarket is to be accessed from Howley Street i.n Peabody and the Jeffers Ltunber � Facility is to be accessed fran Boston Street in Salem. The modifications proposed for the Jeffers Lwnber Corp. Facility consists of demolition activities, relocations of an existing mill building and construction of a new storage building together _ with appurtenant parkings, loading and landscape features as well as new utility coimections. All of the proposed work on the � Jeffers portion of the site is located outside of any resource area or buffer zone as defined in the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. � The activities on the Stop & Shop portion of the site consists of construction of a Supermarket, parking, access, loading and landscaping facilities as well as imderground utilities. The � proposed activities in part aze located within certain resource areas or buffer zones to resource areas as defined the , Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. and are the topic of this � Notice of Intent. The Peabody portion of the property will contain a 363 space parking lot, the front portion of the buildi.ng site access and � egress points and all underground utilities. The Salem portion of the property will contain the bulk of the bui.lding, loading facilities, storm nm off detention facilities and uzderground I utilities. The building will be served by extensions of the PYisting �nicipal sewer water supply . and electrical power facilities located on Aowley Street in Peabody as well as by � natural gas and telecommmications facilities. Surface storm nmoff from the roof of the proposed building and paved areas will be collected by means of a system of piped catch basins and manholes. The system wi.11 terminate in the North River. ISubsequent dociun�ts, calculations and plans presented in this Notice of Intent provide a complete description of the resource � azeas on adjacent to the site and the measures provided within the site design to assure compliance with the performance standards of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. 1 � � � a ENVIROfA�R�1TAL IMPACT 3TATII�N'f IN COMPLIA�ICE WITH PLANNID UNIT DEVEIAPMENP UhIDER SAI�I ZONING ORDINANCE BY TE� SALEM PLANNING BOARD FOR APPLICATION OF 7� STOP & SHOP SUPRRMAuxFr COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A RErAIL STORE ADID FOR JEFFIItS LUMBER CORP. FOR ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING INDUSIRIAL FACILITY i JONE 17, 1993 Revised April 20, 1994 Revised April 28, 1995 �B�1fl40Qfl �,a�d �OPDO� �3�0(3�a40� n0(3a � INTRODUCTION In preparing this document we used the Salem, Massachusetts S�bdivision Regulations currently in effect as a guideline. Description of Site The subject site is shown on site plan dated June 15� 1993 and entitled Property Plan, Sheet 17 of 17 Sheets. The subject site is located on Boston and Howley Streets in Salem and in Peabody, and consists of approximately 7.25 acres, of which 3.82 acres located in Peabody. Sco�e of 7nvestiQation This docinnent has been prepared an the basis of available records, surveys, and cuxrent guidelines used in the City of Salem, Massachusetts, as a�ded to date. Reference is made specifically to Appendix "A" of the SuUdivision Regulations of the City of Salem, Massachusetts, entitled "Requirements for IIzvironmental Impact Statement". i Subjects addressed include: I. Natural Environment II. Man-Made Enviro�nnent III. Public Facilities IV. Commmity Services V. Htmian Considerations The envirornnental impact statements, along with supporting data, follow. •Ba�4ow �+a�d �0¢009 ��oo�a4caao II000 � PUBLIC FACILITIES Water SupP1v The proposed Stop & Shop Facility is to be serviced by a new connection to the existing ten inch water main located on Howley Street in Peabody. 7he proposed water distribution system within the site consists of eight and six inch ��nG, four fire hydrants and appurtenant valves and fittir�gs. A fire flow test was conducted during April of 1993, on the existing Howley Street water main, by Water and Waste Pipe Testing. The results of that test were as follows: __ Static Pressure at hydrant opposite site: 115 PSI '„ Flowing Pressure at hydrant opposite site: 102 PSI Flow at hydrant, Howley & Main Street: 1350 GPM Based upon the results of the fire flow test, an available fire flow in excess of 3000 GPM at a residual pressure of 20 PSI is projected. The conswnptive demand for the proposed Stop & Shop . Facility is estimated to be 7000 gallons per day. The Jeffers facility is presently and will continue to be, serviced by cormections to the existing water main on Boston Street in Salem. Conswnptive demand for the facility is presently 600 gallons per day and will not appreciably change as a result of the anticipated site alterations. No existing or potential surface or groundwater supplies will be impacted by the proposed site activities. Sanitary SeweraQe An estimated daily wastewater stream of 7000 gallons wi.11 be dischazged from the proposed 5top & Shop Facility. Sanitary waste lines aze separated from waste line serving food preparation azeas within the buildic�g. Waste flow fran the food preparation areas is to be directed i.nto an 8000 gallon grease trap, located imderground near the northwest building corner. �aaQo� �Laod �3oQ�ofl Qa�oa�o4oa� n000 • NATC�RAI� EN�IR�fA�]T Air With respect to the proposed Stop & Sliop Facility, the potential for odors or smoke occurring on site is minimal , Heating will be accomplished by gas fired systems, said systems being in strict compliance with all Federal Clean Air standards. Rubbish generated on site will be loaded into closed compactor imits, which will be removed by private contractors on a regular basis. Dust generated during site construction activities will be controlled by wettir�g on a daily basis, when dry climatic conditions occur. With respect to the Jeffers Lwnber Corp. Facility, the major possible source of site generated dust is fran operations occurring during milling of lwnber. An air haixlli.ng and cleaning system, is anci will continue to be, associated with the mill building. The system will be inspected on a regular basis and cleaned, as required, by the owner. Prevailing winds are from the imrtheast and east of the site. Minimal impact upon downwirni entities will occur, in pazt due to the bowl like shape of the site and, in part due to the lack of sources of smoke, dust or aior from the site. • No incineration of refuse, demolition debris or other activity which could adversely affect air quality is proposed for this project. All refuse will be handled within enclosed areas imtil removed b land carriers to a roved waste dis sal facilities. Y tt Po �a�4o� �aod �3oQc�oa o��ootlo4oao BoQo • Effluent from the grease trap and the sanitary waste line will be pwnped existing eight inch sanitary sewer located on Howley Street in Peabody. The wastewater p�mp station, which is designed in canpliance with Local and State Requirert�nts, will be maintained by Stop & Shop. 10" on Howley Street passes tmder RR & North River by means of a siphon, then into SESD interceptor. Sanitary wastes from the Jeffers property will be discharged into the existing sewer located on Boston Street in Salem. The average daily waste flaw is presently 600 gallons per day and will not appreciably change as a result of the proposed site alterations. No process wastes are expected from the Jeffers property. Storm Drai.naQe Facilities Storm drai.nage from the westerly portion of the Stop & Shop site (the main parking lot) and the proposed buildi.ng roof drains is directed into a series of coimected catch basins, manholes and an oil/water separator; all of which are directed toward the North River. Sheet runoff from the easterly (slope and loadix� area) portion of the site is directed toward a new compensatory storage area, to be located in the northwest portion of the site. . Stormwater will exit the area thr ough a twelve inch diameter drain and be directed toward the North River, after passing through an oil/water separator. All storm nmoff will exit the site through a proposed cancrete ' open chazmel passi.ng beneath the MBTA trackage and into the North River. The proposed catch basins will be equipped with gas and oil separators, to be maintained by the owner, in order to m;n;m;ze the potential for introduction of petrochemicals from the site into the North River. All drainage from proposed paved azeas will be muted through Lmderground oil/water separators to provide further removal of sedvnent and hydrocarbons. �o�Qo� �,aod �oQ�oa Da�oo�aQoa� nooa � �� A topographical survey of the site has been performed by Eastern Land Survey Associates� Inc., of Peabody, MA. The results of the survey are given on Sheet 3 of the Definitive drawings. Elevations on site range fran 8 feet to 42 feet above Mean Sea Level Dat�n. 7he site slopes steeply fran the southerly lot line toward a flatter area adjacent to the M.B.T.A. Trackage. Proposed site grading characteristics call for stabilization of the steeply sloping azeas by means of graviry retaini 9 walls. The major portion of the Stop & Shop site will be relatively flat wi.th slopes of one to two percent predominating. The major topographic limitation presented by the site is that a portion lies in a 100 year flood plain. Grading of the parking and loading areas has been accanplished so that to insure no incremental loss of flood storage. The proposed building slab is to be constructed 6 inches above the level of the 100 year flood plain in Peabody. No percolation tests were conducted on the Stop & Shop or the Jeffers Lwnber site since both sites have public sewer available to the property line. Table 1 describes the various cover types which will exist after construction of the proposed facilities. i Proposed site gradir�g is described on Sheets 9,10,11 & 16 of the Definitive Plan. The topic of wetland resource areas on or adjacent to this site is discussed in a subsequent section of this docimient. Water & Wetlands There is no Imown existing or potential public or private surface or groimd water supply within the water shed of the North River to which the site is tributary. As discussed in a earlier section of this docw�nt a portion of the site of proposed Stop & Shop facility lies within the 100 year flood plain adjacent to the North River. Proposed grading characteristics of the site are such that no loss of incremental flood storage volwnes will occur as a result of the proposed , activity. This site will therefore result in no ' act u n �P Po PXjsting flood stage or duration on or outside of the property. �Ba�4o� �aod �3opoca� �a�oo�n4oa� II000 i �� o�sID �o� �o� TYPE STOP & SFiOP FACILITY � OF TOTAL AREA (SF) Building 62,830 21.2 Paved Areas 163,050 55.0 Iandscaped Areas 38,400 12.9 Natural Vegetation 32,370 10.9 JEFFERS LDMBER CORP. Buildings 10,700 32.8 Paved Areas 12,400 37.9 ' . Iandscaped Areas 9,570 29.3 �Baa4o� G�aod �opoo� ��ootla0oao II000 � The proposed method of sewer disposal is by means of a connection to the City of Peabody sewer system. The project will therefore have no impact on surface or groimd water supply. The following mitigating measures wi.11 be adopted to meet the performance standards of the Wetland Regulatians and to preserve the site's natural amenity value: * A si.ngl.e, continuous row of staked haybales backed by a siltation fence shall be i.nstalled along the length of the project parallel with the North River indicated on the Plan. This li.ne of haybales and silt fence is proposed in order to provide an erosion and sedimentation control barrier as recomnended in "Erosion & Sedurentation Control guidelines, DEQE, 1983." Haybales furnished shall be twi.ce looped with wire or other cordage resistant to rot. Haybales shall be set in an excavated trench 6" deep, oriented with the wire loops parallel to the surface contour, tightly butted to adjacent bales, and staked with two 2"X2"X3' stakes or sections of 'rebar' spaced equally in the bale and driven solidly into the underlying material. No spoil fran the excavation of the trench shall be placed or stockpiled on • the resource area side of the barrier. NOTE: Additional haybailing required by the Conanission �ng the project duration shall also be provided and inatalled in accordance with the previous pazagraph. * Areas of exposed soils which are exposed for rt�re than 2 weeks will be mulched with hay in order to control erosion on site. * All installed catch basins wi.11 have swnps to collect debris within the structured drainage system. * All new catch basins within paved surface will be provided with gas and oil separator hoods. * Parking lot drainage will be routed through an oil/ water separator prior to discharge to the North River. i �Ba�4o� �+aad �oQoo� Qa�oo�o4oa� �ooa . On June 16, 1993, the site was reconnoitered for the possible presence of rare and pnrlan�ared species as listed by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species program. No evidence of listed species or vernal pool habitat were noted during the field inspection. In addition, the Atlas Fsti.mated Habitats of State-Listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife was consulted for the possible occurrence of estimated habitat within the vi.cinity of the project. No such area was shown within a five mile radius of the project. The property was assessed by Somner Environmental Technologi.es, Inc. ("SET") with respect to the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. Ch. 131, s40) (WPA) and its regiil.ations 310 (2gt 10.00. The Wetlands Protection Act requires that certain wetlands, ponds, streams, and adjacent areas are to be protected as "resource" azeas. Bordering vegetated wetland is defined as an area where over 50% of the plants aze wetlands indicator species. Stream („ banks anci azeas subject to periodic floodi.ng aze also protected. The property in question is located at the corner of Howley and Main Streets in Peabody, Massachusetts. On several occasions in May and June of 1993, Mr. Paul Somner of Somner Ehvirornnental Technologies, Inc. ("SET") investigated the subject property tmder the Wetlands Protection Act. This investigation revealed several areas to be investigated as potential resource areas on • the property. The primary resource areas on or adjacent to the site are directly associated with the presence of the North River which ' runs its course approxi.mately 35 feet north of the rear or northerly property line. The subject site is insulated fran the river by the presence of a railway track bed. The resource areas associated with the North River include; Land ' Under Water Bodies ("LUWB") (10.56), Bank (10.54) and Bordering Land Subject to Flooding. The proposed project will not impact the LUWB. As identified in the 10.54 performance standards for LUWB "No alteration of water carrying capacity, water quality, fisheries breeding or cover or habitat wi.11 result from this project. �� aa4o� �+aod �o�oo� D��oo�aooao II000 • Activities proposed in the Bank area include construction of a maxi.mimi 6 foot box culvert with wingwall which will discharge stormwater at law velocity (2-3 fps) to the river edge. The total proposed disturbed azea of bank is 15 lineaz feet or less. This proposal outfall is in compliance with the Bank Performance Standards (10.54(4)). Specifically, the outfall will not effect the stability of the bank or the water carrying capacity of the channel. Due to the engineered design of the stormwater system, including PIDC type catch basins and a oil/water separators, the project will not adversely effect surface and groimdwater quality. The alteration of 15 feet or less of this bank wi.11 not impact breeding or habitat for fisheries. Finally, this is a typical urbanized river bank. Field investigation of the area identified no significant azeas of wi.ldlife habitat. Yet, the project rP��nG below the allowable threshold of 10% allowable in the 310 Q�II2 10.54 Perfoxmance Standards. The proposed project is situated within the flood plain of the North River. This project has been designed to provide for compensatory storage of flood storage in compliance with the Performance Standards for Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (10.57(4)(a)). • The project site was also assessed for the presence of Bordering Vegetated Wetland ("BVW") imder 310 CNIIt 10.55 and Isolated Iand Subject to Flooding (10.57 (1)(b)). Due to the isolating effect of the railway road bed, no areas of wetland vegetatian were noted as contiguous with the North River resource aras. In fact, only one location on site was foimd to support a vegetative conemmity with an excess of 50% wetlarnis identifier species. This locale was identified as an abandoned railway spur located in the northwest corner of the property. This spur is depressed below grade and appears to retain precipitation and nmoff and is completely isolated fran the North River. Triis area is domi.nated by cattails (1� spp) and reed (�Phra tes commmis). Although the area supports vegetation and is capable of storing water, this area dces not confine a volwne of 1/4 acre foot of water (10.57(2)(b)) and is therefore not an Isolated Land Subject to Flooding resource area. An additional area of limited wetlands vegetation was foimd located adjacent to the railway track bed at the center of the northern property line. This area is isolated from the North River, does not store water and does not support a commaiity of wetlands plants in excess of 50% cover. �aa4o� �+aad �aQ�o� Qa�oo�oQoa� Dooa � �� The proposed Stop & Shop Facility will be heated by natural gas, which is available in Howley Street in Peabody. A store this size is anticipated to require 54000 cubic feet of gas azmually. Electric services is similarly provided by means of an imderground comiection to the existing system on Howley Street, Peabody. The store is expected to have a daily requirement of 8500 kilowatts. Minimal change in energy requirements will occur on the Jeffers Lwnber Corp. site. Noise . The proposed Stop & Shop Supexmarket on Howley Street in Peabaly and Salem, Massachusetts will generate certain noise during the construction phase and subsequent operation of the store. During the construction phase of the project, the principal noise- generating activities include: demolition of the partial structures on-site, site grading, steel erection and building cladding, diesel truck traffic moving to and from the site, and construction vehicles operati.ng on site. Noise impacts fr�n the construction machinery operating on site will be imavoidable � temporary and variable in nature. In order to m;n;m;ze such temporary noise impacts the following measures will be taken: .No explosives will be used for demolition. .Construction activity will take place during the normal working hours of 7 AM to 5 PM Monday through Saturday. .All noise-generating equipment to be used will be inspected to ensure that required mufflers are in place and in goocl working condition. The primary sources of operational noise will come $om the rooftop equi�nent used to heat or cool the store and its product, and the delivery trucks parked at the loading docks. Baseline sound level readings have been measured at the nearest .property line and the neazest residence during a time (2 AM) when noise fran the new store would be most noticeable. These levels were 41 dba and 39 dba respectively which is typical for a suburban location such as Howley Street and Boston Street. �ture sound levels from the store will conform to the Massachusetts Department of Protection (DEP) noise regulations which limit the increase frwn a new source to 10 dba above existing levels. 1�pical sound reduction measures for the roof equipment include a �Bo�Qo� G�and �oPoo� �a�oo�aQoa� II000 � parapet along the store roofline to shield adjacent residents, sotmd barriers around each piece of equipment, ar factox}*- inatalled acoustical treatment packages. Truck deliveries to the � store aze expected to be mini.mal durit�g the overnight period. However, one typical mitigation measure being investigated for this location is a sourbd absorbing panel arrangement across fran the loading docks. In addition, the large grade difference from the loading docks up to the elevated residents will provide a natural berm helping to further reduce truck noise. Flora & Fauna The site provides a range of conditions, including a steep wooded slope in the south easterly portion of the property which supports a mixed decidous cnmm,n�ty of oak and maple. The balance of the property is urbanized and industrial land supporting a shrub layer of weeds and grasses. Due to the urban/industrial nature of the site, it is expected that the area would support a limited variety of fauna. These would include: rat, mouse, raccoon and oposswn. Avian species observed on site are robin, pigeon, csow, sparrow and seagulls. • �o�4ow �+aad �aQ�o� Da�oo��4oao II000 • MAN MADE EN�IROIVMENT Land Use I Existing land uses to the south of the site are residential, i.ndustrial and public (City of Peabody Cemetery). F�cisti�g land uses to the west of the site are comnercial. Iand to the northwest of the site is com�rcial, and land to the north of the site consists of the M.B.T.A. Trackage, and the North River. There aze rro existiqg or proposed public or comnon recreational areas within the proposed Stop & Shop or Jeffers I�m�ber sites. The southwesterly corner of the site at the intersection of Main Street and Howley Street in Peabody has been reserved for a gateway between the cities of Peabody arui Salem. Densitv Table 1 in a prior section of this docwnent provides a cwnplete tabulation of the proposed site characteristics. Zonir� G�rrent zoning designations for the site include Light Industry and Central Business in Peabody and Industrial, Business B-2 and • Residence R-2 in Salem. No activity is proposed withi.n the R-2 portion of the site in Salem. The industrial and business portions of the Salem portion of the property are the topic of the PUD Application. Architecture The proposed Stop & Shop Facility is a one story steel framed masonry structure on a reinforced concrete slab. Wood and brick veneer treatments enhance the appearance of the front of the store. The height of the building is lower that the grade of properties to the south of the site, specifically, appro�mately 26 feet. The relocated and altered mill building an the Jeffers Lwnber Corp. site will be a steel framed, stell walled building of one story height with a sloped roof. None of the proposed structures will significantly interfere with existing natural views. •�a�Qow G�aod �oQoo� ��oo�aQoa� II000 • Iandscaping for the Stop & Shop facility will consist of a treed buffer adjacent to Howley Street, landscaped islands within the parking lot and coniferous plantings along the boundary of residential properties to the south of the site. Details of proposed landscaping aze shown on Sheet 6 of the Definitive Site Plan. Historic BuildinQs, Historical Sites and Archeolo�ical Sites There are rro lmown historic buildings, sites or archeological sites within or adjacent to the site. • �aaQo� �+aod �30��0� o��ooiin4oa� D000 • Refuse Disposal The Stop & Shop Facility will be expected w generate the following types and amotmts of refuse on a monthly basis: Cardboard: 50 tons Rubbish: 33 tons Produce Waste: 10 tons Refuse is to be stored in compactor tmits to the east of the proposed building and picked up on a regular basis by private contractors. Minimal change will occur in existing solide waste generation on the Jeffers Lwnber Corp. site. Traffic Facilities Proposed traffic impact assessment is discussed in a report by Robert D. Vanasse Associates, imder separate cover. The proposed parking layout for the 5top & Shop Facility provi.des 363 parking spaces, including 8 spaces for handicapped persons. • Proposed parking characteristics on the Jeffers Linnber Corp, site provides twenty three parkuig spaces and two truck parking spaces. �Bo�Qo� �+aod �opoo� D��oo�aQoao II000 . � COMMUNITY SERVICES Schools No impact on the school population is expected as a result of the project. Recreation No recreation activity is plazmed on the site, since the use is solely com�rcial. Police Our investigation shows there will be adequate Police protection for the facility. Fire All requirements of the fire code will be met. A fire flow in excess of 3000 gallons per minute is available in Howley Street. . Public Works Howley Street, which will be the main entrance and exit, to the Stop & Shop site is a public way. Maintenance is planned so � that the way will adequately serve the site. Boston Street, which wi.11 be the main entrance and exit to the Jeffers Linnber Corp. site, is also a public way. �0�40� G�aod �aQoo� �a�ootloQoa� dooa � HUMAN CANSIDERATIONS Parks-Recreation The development will not impact � any publicly held property in the vicinity. Public Health The develoFment will have no adverse effect on public health. Rodent extermination, in accordance with all applicable regulations, will be practiced prior to cmmnencement of site demolition or earthmoving activities. As previously discussed, both facilities will be cormected Eo the municipal water supply and wastewater disposal systems. All solid waste generated on site wi.11 be stored in closed containers and picked up by prviate collectors. Aesthetics and Visual Impact The development of the proposed Stop & Shop Facility will result in a more built up environment than presently exists an the site. Fire ravaged ra.mains of former buildings will be demolished and . removed and vazious remnants of past uses will be taken fran the site. The proposed use will result in a neighborhood superniarket facility, maintained by a responsible owner who is sensitive to the surrounding area. �aaQo� �aad �oQoo� ��oo�n4oa� Bo�o . FLOOD STORAGE SUNAfARY Portions of the proposed developnent in Peabody and Sal�n have been designated flood zones by the United States Department of Housi.ng and Urban Development, through the national floal insurance program, and depicted on flood insurance rate maps that have been adopted by the City of Peabody and the City of Salem. To 6ui.ld new projects in (2ones "A") which are comnonly lmown as 100 year flood zones, compensatory flood storage must be provided. These "A" Zones areas are given an elevation of which it is expected that the water may flood to that level once in a 100 years. To construct a b�ildi.ng or put material on site at a level below the 100 year flood elevation an equai amount of contiguous material �m�st be removed from a portion of the site at these same levels. The portion of the site lying in Peabody below elevation 12 is in the 100 year flood plain while that portion of the site lying below elevation 11 in the Salem portion is within the 100 year • flood plainr The proposed site plan has been graded in a manner such that for each 1 foot level of existing storage in the Pxjstir�g condition, equal or greater volwne of flood storage will PXist on the site subsequent to construction. I'� �a�4oQa �aod �aQoo� Da�oo��4oa� II000 � � � ..� .� o�r �r �r .ir ...i � � r� .�r � � � ..�.•..r� � � � C H z � , , , m _ _ . � d , _ 4 ^ a _ _ w w ; � , . _ � . y � J' o o a a � � 0� N � � �� ._ _ . _ __ � a : µ :... � ......1 �- : �__ _. _. .. . . � � � ° �y � ? ' .0 _ . . 0 , cn s u-.: Z" .y' � � . ?` � .r, , . _ _.. . � o J ' � d r: �v W ��;_ �, _a � ^ u.. � I.. _ W d � � T � o Z � Z , C. k _ � �. 4 ' ' ' e� � �^. r .� m � � � � ,: � � N � � � � w �� ,. S�. � _c C '� � .. . . :... ..._. �__ T , . . .._. ep � w a y� �I1 ` Q N U U N �J: J �i . ... Il .......W � r ! , a..... N ..... ....... ..... ' � � ` 1 y_ � Q N _ u: ,y � J � " U� r _ . , _ Q. � o � _ � �j� , �i ° _� Q � . % ... Z u_ 3 �� _ 'I � o.. 0 < _ _. . � y ,..� � �' , f✓ C _� o N `� _�p �, L � 4 Q H/ �� W R: e� u� _ . � � �N 6 � a 3 � � i ' a '" r 7 � y. � ...� a � � � ' " d �, � : � .� - , � � � = - ..a. , ' ° d+ � U � t/1 �wON `.. � ... � . _u ... 7 J. .. : 4- � iy �.... � J O _. __x �1 ... �. � a y vd .. �: � � ^ . r � _1. � I � u � a ��yao �� o � t' � s � U' � � � y � � �' µ _ uYi �=a m �,� Q 4 ? Q j (() �; 1• : �p _ - �p. � v�i =�o° _� � o J � ? o ° � � 6 � J- � �..� �j � . u' `p �.. _ s > > ^ . � V Q .._ ,QIO_ . f� � z M�m� � r � � - F Q r � Q � '� l� � r Z � N N � '' " i� i� d � ' �� li s � a .. � o a � q � u u � _ S u P � .. ' � . LL ; J. � u- � � � .Qvr � � o , 7 � � `q _ � y ._ ...._0. � N _ _a �r . '_. � :..... .... ... . ....... � � 1 � � _ _. . _ - _ �. ; n � Q � � .... �—�—�—.�—�—'�— ��s.—'�—�....—.�—.��—�� . aoe ��oP E� S.aov 8��,1 A EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES� INC. SHEETNO. Z oF � Chrlatopher R. Mello PLS ' 40 Lowell Street CALCULATED BY -� s�1'^'� DATE �-� � - 5� � PEABODY, MASS. 01960 (508) 531-8121 CHECKEDBY DATE � SCALE I _ ....... ....... ..... _. .......... . ..... . :. � a�c u �6.S+..r d T o i7 r�, w rr� �+.i itcr�E "3 .. I ......... � 2�..A= . 16 Z� R..0 :_( O .O�_a t �S. � 1.2 �.�oc PGV6c�., .. I ...... ..... ..... . . ..... ...... . ... . . .. � � _.. . Eo9x . 3 + 1.2 K.,9) �L2� = o. �, co_ I _ e. ... e � ..... ........ �C =. 1 O +-n� n� ._ L = Gt c� •,�i�Q, ... �,_ : I ._ ' ._. .... . __ . . ....... .__ , .... .. ... ..... -�-� = �i C. ...... � � -. .... .. . . _. _ _.... . ....... .... __ .... .. _ = C �•Zg) (4•q��o �� I _ � , � = 5 , dd e� s _ •, Oy-t �E-i '. - Z - 1Z" �\��S 5 � . OOS I . _.. . .......... . . �.._. �.. �.... . � ...... . _. . .� . ' - . . � -... � __ _ ... �-._ y _ � .G x . ooE� �2._ x , zSZ'� --- _ • o ,� I . . _ _. �, = d , o� Fas ( _ _ � _ ,16Sxd , 0�1 � Z � = G. 3� CFS ' . _ ' I _ . � _ . ._._ ��7/��rN . .'K�L`N:..G^tE ....3 -[O. � CL.�� .1 .YY�..b�`L.L.GLE Z . I ; I......o,.n ctow___= q:�3'L cFS � c Fsz . E� ct3 y� _ � � _ . . __ I _ P s s v-r+�E.o .. t-L w,� ��r -t�: c o .�.' _ �, ..._ .�._ ;.�x.�_= 3 •to sF __ � _�' W P = 4 + _ 2k,q - 5. o' ,S = . o.o � _ � . . �� y l .dq x oOJ�' x 3.L )Z�3 _. . ( " _ _. • o �'� �3.6 . . I . I.. = 2 S �j FP.S. � c� a z�59 �3, C , = .� .3z G� s _ _ ' � , : .. . ':.. _ ' _ , , � � . . _ vnowcrmri yas.eii�i mm�fl�i k.cm.�.mm.reavrnnrtmums iaoo-moro � ��_S-ro�+ f, S1-�bP 61�1� EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES� INC. SHEETNO. � oF � ' Christopher R. Mello PLS 40 Lowell Street cucuuhoev -»'�'� on�___3- �8-9'S � PEABODY, MASS. 01960 (508) 531•8121 GMECKEDBV DATE � SCALE G�l�G 41 �3/�S! �-1 'j -ra s�m 1-1 'Z '� _ ASZE�1 = o.� Ac, (. oc. ac .�� , . s� a� .. �ova.p� . . _. � ;.. _. e = _(. oc, x ;� -} . •sy �.a>j .c.....= � s -4 IT'�= �o w„t, � 'L : d.��'�►-Le. �I A , c _. ° _ . I � _ ._ � ,. _ . C. �� (a•g� ( •s�> _ , I ; - . z. 4 'l l cFS _ , � _ oJilE'( '._.. 1Z" p1 'D �, S = • ao� ' I �! _ �,4 �1 _�, , 00ce�t x _ . zsZ�3 e _ ( , o �� _ = 3 5Z FpS : _ _. . _ c-� _ •�65 x 3,5z �I _ = Z,17 cFS _ . �' _ � c.q �c�.... S3 .ss,y � ' -ra__ 3o,r c.,LV�cz-c _ � � �B.�A = ; 5'� .__AC IC � _ ; Q .� _. � _ TG t. �0 YYl 1 N ..._l, � � � ,J�..Q-^4 .... . ......... .... ...... ...... ...... ( c� = 4L� _ �I = _ C• s�)(d .q�.�• g� — � 5� c�s - . �I o�nEl ._ 8.� � ► �. � S ° . � S� � � I �J_ . ,.aq „ . og '�z x . 1 4� Z�g �... . o '� . I _ ,•,5 FFS _ . _ . , , � - . 34 � �:�s � . . _ . _ ' = Z . GGZ 'cFS . _. en001Cf10Ff(SW&461ASt fl�l0x 4�..6a».Ys.�m.to4mnPM0�ZNLLW&I�Dp5�0 _ � doe S� oP E. Sr�4V �\31A EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES� INC. SHEETNO. d � Q Christopher R. Mello PLS ' 40 Lowell Street CALCUUTED BV �u.-+-+ DATE 3-�$ '°13 PEABODY, MASS. 01960 (508) 531-8121 CHECNED BV DATE SCALE I .:. .. .. _ .__ _. _ .. ..,.. .. . . . ............ �m N .. Z -ro � wr�-1 .. l ' .,, O�P�.ow;.... = lA-,,3 cPS � c6 \ t .Z , � cvo ..._d� .. .... , .. . .. I .. .._ . ,.. . ......... .__ : . ,... . .... . .... ' :.. "t .....W� OE �.. GU� cQttE ...30Y. CVLVb2'1 . ,. ._ ._ ,.... . I . _ �SSVI"YI.Eo :. � EP �LL o� __FLO �.J�. = O .�' . �. ... . � ..._ . ..... ...... �2�� _ � .c.'.._. I WP = �.$• _. 'I 5 = . 00z3 ' . �! _ _.1��°i _x . • o:oz3 � /` 3.C.,t'3 _ ' � ci3 \ 5.6 _ . . � ... : .= 3. '\ 1. FPS i : . '.�� . . . ,_ . ' ... ...._.. _ . . : ._... � _ ; . .. . _.. .... . ._ � Cs� — 3. C. y 3.�`l ; . ,_ �\1L."�j -GFS .. . ... . .. ... _ . . . � �_ � :; .. ...... . . . ..... ._.. . .. . .. _. . ........ . ' �_ .. . . . . ..... . . __ .... . .... .... I ._. .__ ... __.. ._ . _ -_ _ � ,. ...... . . ___�. . ... __ .... '�.,. . _ . �__. ..... _ ._. ..... I �:,.. _ .._. : ., . _ .__. . , � �:.. . ._.. .......... . _ . .. .._. I -... ........ .l.. ._. . . _ � I ' I - ... � .... . ._. . .... . ... � ; i �I � -... , ..... ..._ ....... . ,. ....... .... ........... . .... 'I . . . . .., . ��.... . . ��.. .. _. �. .. _.. . . ... , I ..... . _ . . _ ............ _... . ...... . ....... . . .... , ._... ..... ......,. �YNQOILfA41RR�6A1NIZ6tfl�EbE)QnEc.6aRYm.Mnl.ioPbRQF1011NRFl-0Oo-1E640 � � . . , � ' Quick TF-55 Version: 4. 04 S/N: 87011U96 F'age 1 of 5 � TR-55 TAE�ULAF HYDF.OGf•;AFH METHOD Type III Distributic�n C24 hr . Duration Storm� � Er:ec ut ed: 0.^•,-18-1993 15: 4C�:08 Watershed File --? C: 8131A . WSD Hydre�graph File --:% C:8131A . HYD SU year runoff fr�m b�ck partian of site � ' >7.> Input F'arameters Used t�� r,mpute Hydrograph <:<:C ----------------------------. ..__.....-------------------------------- ------------------ Subai-�•�: AREA CN T� �- Tt Frecip. � Runc�ff Ie.ip ' DE�scriptior� Cacres> Chrs7 Chrs) Cinl ; Cin) input:used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i �. s�_ ��. h �. �o c�.ua a. ao ; a. ie .c» . i� "_"'_________________"ry'_'_"'__'_____""'_.._.._"_______"'_"_____"""________" r Travel tine `rom su6area uutfall t_� c��mpc�site w��tershed c�utfall p��int . � T�tal area = Z,50 acres ��r 0.003�1 sq. mi Peak discharge = 6 cfs � %�`�ii Gamputer Modificatic�ns U� ;rpu� Far�meters ;:<C<: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Input Values F,'�unded Values Ia/p S�ibati^ea T�_ * Tt Tc x Tt Inte� polated Ia/p Descripti�m CFrr ; (hr ) Chr) Chr ) CYes/No1 Messaqes ----------------------------------._...-------------. ---------------------------.i- O. .,G O. c70 +�� ** No Cc�mputed Ia/p , ------------------�------------------------------------------------------------ * Travel time from su6area _�utfall t�� vmpasite watershed �utfall p��int . # Tc R� Tt are ava:leble in the hydre,graph t�bles. � � ' � � � � IQui�k TR-55 Versian: 4.04 S/N: 87011096 Page 2 uf 5 � TF.�-JJ TASULAF. HYDROGRAFH METHDD Type III Distribution C24 hr . Duratiun Storm) ' Executed: U3-18-1393 15: 40: 08 Watershed File --:• C:: 8131A .WSD Hydre,graph �ile --> C:8131A .HYD ' 10 year runoff from back partion of site ' ' }:» Summary c+` Suberea Times to Pe�k ::<; : Time tc� Fea4: at ' Pe�-�k Discharge Composite Dutfall Subare� (cfs7 (hrs? 1 --------E----- i2. 4 ^ - ' ` li• Compasite Waters��d E ' � �3 � ' ' � ' i 1 I � 1 i ' QU1C�: TR-JJ Versian: 4.U4 S/N: 87d11G96 Fage � c�f 5 �� TF.'-55 TABULAF' H`fDF,OGP,AF'H METHOD Type III Distributian C�4 hr . Duratian St�rmi � Executed: 03-18-1'3'33 15: 4U:08 Watershed File --` C: B1�lA .WSD Nydr�graph File --; C:8131A .HYD � 10 year runoff from bacL, parti�n of site ' __-_-____-__Cc�mpasite Hydre�graph Summary (cfs? •---------- ----------------------------------------------- Subarea 11 . 0 11 . 3 11 . E 11 .5 1�. 0 lc^. 1 11. 1 12. 3 1�. 4 Descripti�m_ ____ hr___ _hrr____Vhr_____hr____-hr __hr_____hr_____hr_____hr__ ' ------------ --- : c> a i i � � a s E atal Ccfs)---------"------C'------i------i-------`------2-----4------J------6-- �----------------1 -------1---('----1 -------1---[�----1--------------1---l'----1---C----1 ---p- Subarea yL� � 1L� 1J 1L� � YL� O 1J�O �J� i 1J� T 1J� U ♦J� v Descripticm_______hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_____hr__ ' �----------- 1 6 4 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- otal Ccfs) E 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 i�- I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subarea 14.0 14.3 14.6 15. G 15. .�, 1E. 0 16.5 17. p 17. .�, Descriptiun_______hr_____hr_ hr hr hr hr hr hr hr �i----------- 1 1 -----i------0-----0-----0-----0-----0------G-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � atal C� fs) 1 1 1 0 O 0 0 U O � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Su6area 18. 0 19.d 20.0 22.0 26.0 � Description_____ hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_____hr_ i O C� O 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- al Cc fs) O 0 0 0 0 � ' � �u:�k TF.-55 Version: 4. t�4 S/N: 8701109E, Page 4 of 5 TR-55 TAbULAR HYDP.OGRAFH METHOD � Type III Distribution C24 hr. Duration Storm) Executed: 03-18-1993 15:40:08 � Watershed File --> C:E131A .WSD Hydrograph File --� C:8131A .HYD lU year runoff fr�m ba�k porti�n of site ' � ;, Time Flr,w Time Fl�w ' � (h-_7-------C` fs) Chrs)-------Ccfs) 11 . C1 U 1�3. B 0 ' 11 . 1 � 14.9 U 11 . � 0 15.0 0 SS . 3 Q SJ. S O � 11 . 4 Q 1�.2 0 � 11 . 5 1 15. 3 G 11 . E 1 15.4 0 SI . 7 S SJ. J U � 11 .8 1 l.�i.6 0 11 . � 1 15. 7 O 12. C� � 15. 8 0 ' 12. 1 � 1.�,.9 6 1�. 2 4 16. � U 12.3 5 16. 1 0 12. 4 6 16. � 0 � 1::.5 E 16. 3 U 12. E�/ 4 lE. � U 1<� / J lE.r� O ' 12. 8 3 16. 6 O 12. 3 2 16.7 0 13. 0 1 16.8 0 5:.. 1 S S6. � O � 13.2 1 17.0 p SJ.o S I7. S O ' 13. 4 1 17. 2 O � SJ. S 1 17.:, O 13. E 1 17. � 0 13.7 1 17.5 0 � 13.8 1 17.6 0 13.9 1 17.7 0 14.0 1 17.8 0 � 14. 1 1 17. 5 U 14,2 1 18.0 0 14. 3 1 18. 1 0 14. 4 1 . 18.2 O � 14. � 1 18.3 0 14.6 1 18.� 0 14.7 1 18.5 0 - � � Qu:c1: TP.-55 Versian: 4. p4 S/N: 87011U36 Fage 5 of 5 � TR-55 TA&ULAR HYDP,O�RAFH METHOD Type III Distributian C24 hr. Duratian 5tarm) � Executed: 0�-18-1993 15: �0: 08 Watershed File --> C:8131A .WSD Hydrograph File --> C: 8131A .HYD � 1C� year runc�ff from ba�k porti��n ��f site I � Time Flow Time Fl��w Chrs1 Ccfs} Chrs) C�. fs) ----------------- ------- ---------._.... � 18. 6 0 ��. -". 4 IB. 7 0 22. 5 U 18. 8 � 2�. 6 U ' SB. 9 �� 2. 7 U 1':'. C.; 0 <2. 8 C� 15. 1 G 2:'. 9 U ' � 119. :' U/� cJ. IJ U • 1J� J " LrI� S J i'3. �i � 23. � 0 S�. J U 1J.J 9 1 1�. 6 O 23.4 O i�. � u ��.s o 1�'3j.8J 0(y 23.'6''/ 0 � S�.i� J L/ Lti:� I O <O. 0 G 23.8 C> 20. 1 6 23. 9 0 20, � 0 24.0 0 � 2o. a o �ti. i a 2o. a o 2a.2 � 2o.s a 2a. � o ' 2p.E O 24. 4 0 20.7 n 24. 5 0 �0. S O �4. E, O , � ��yG. 9 0 24.7 0 i1�0 � i�� S � 21. 1 O �4.9 O 21.2 O 25. G O � 21 .3 O 25. 1 U 21.4 O 25.2 O zi. s o 2s. � a � 21 . 6 A 25. 4 O 21.7 0 25.5 O 21. 8 0 25. 6 G • 21. 9 O �5.7 0 � 22.0 0 25. 8 0 22. 1 U 25.9 0 L2. 2 O � Z-, •, O i� J ' 4.!uic4: Tfc-55 Versian: 4.C�4 S/N: 87011036 � Flc�w (cfs) O.0 1 . 0 �. d 3.�� 4. 0 5.0 6. 0 7.C� B.O 9.0 10.G 11 . 0 . ------ � ----- � ----- ----- ----- ----- � � � � ----- 1 I I----- � I � ----- �----- �----- � - � ' � 1 .7 - I * t � 11 . 6 -7 �t � ' * � 1 .5 - � * � * <. 4 - I * � 1 * 12. 1 -t * � * � �.2 - I � � * S<� J � 1 'X � .1 1 � r�? 1 �:' 1 * . J — i # i * �12.6 - � � � � * 7 ' - � ;. f * . B -t � ' ; * ^. 9 -1 �- ' �r � ��.0 - � �t 1 * i3. 1 - { * i * � ^ � ' �r e:I�L —1 1 � 1.�.Y..� —i 'K' 1 �, A 1 J� T 1 * 1 * �J.S —i * � *, � �J^ 6 ' * • 1 � * ' 3:7 -; * 1 * 1^ 8 ' + J• �� ' ' * rl� J � '� � TIME Chrs> �t Hydrograph file ---> C: 8131A .HYD Qmax = 6. 0 cfs � � aFOND-� Version: 4. 0� Page 1 af E � S/N: 88n207�1 �t*�r�t*�-�-�t�t***�t**�t�t*�t**�t*�t�t�t�t �t * ' # ba�4; area af building * * �t * * x� x� i � * �tx-�t�t**.z T.�*��r�c-�t�*x�at�t�t�t�tat*�t�* ' EXECUTED U3-18-13'�3 15:�35:41 Disk Files: C:NEWFOND . PND p C:8131A .HYD ' INITIAL CONDITIONS Elevaticm = 6.<U ft OutflGw - t�. G cfs � GIVEPd F'OND DATA _______rOMPUTATIONS � ELEVATION ; OUTFLOW � STOP.AGE � � �S/t I 2S/t + c` I 1 I tft :� ; Ccfs7 1 Cac-ft ? I 1 (cfsl � Ccfsa � 1 ------`-- I --------- ; ----------� I ------------ � - � --------U. O � � E. ^C> ' O. 0 ' O. UO l � O.0 1 ' ' I 7. 00/y 1 1 . 6 � C%. v4 � ; /��3/.7 � �1j1 . 3 I � � 1 S� CI`I 1 ��i 1 C)� J E 1 1 O! � S 1 . J S � J I � e. �r� ; 5. C> � 1 . oe ; � �6 i . � I 2EE. 4 7 I �. OU I .�,.7 � 1 . 98 I � 473.� 1 484. 9 � � ------------------------------ -------------------------- Time increment Ct> = G. 100 hrs. � � � � � � � � � � ND-'� Version: 4.03 S/N: 88020731 Fage � c�f 6 �TCnd File: C: NEWF'OND .FND EXECUTED: 0�-18-ird�d3 Infl��w Hydr�graph: C:8131A .HYD 15:45:41 Dutfl�w Hydr�graph: C::NEWFOND .HYD INFLOW HYDROGRAFH _________________ROL'TIN�a_COMPUT�iTIONS ----------------- ---------------------- � TIME � INFLOW I i II+I2 ; 2S/t - 0 t 2S/t + O � OUTFLOW IELEVATION � 1 Chrs7 i Ccfs7 � I Ccfs? � ' Ccfs) t Ccfs� 1 Cft ) I -------- � --------f �---------� ----Ccfs7--- I ----------- I --------- I ---- � � 11. UC�C1 I C1. C� l � ----- f 0.0 � 0.�; U. U t E. �0 I '' 11. ICi� � 0. 0 � � 0.0 1 O.0 � 4. U� C�. O I E. �C I 11.�C�U I 0. 0 I S 0. U f 0.0 � G. U 1 C�.0 1 6. 2C� � � 11 .30C� � O. 0 I � d.C� � d.O f O. �� n.0 � E�.2�� 1 ' 1 I.4oC� � 0. 0 � 1 0. 0 i 0.0 I C. C� � G.(1 ; 6, ^cC� I ' I 1 •J C)C> i S . �� i i 1. C� i �.7 i I .C�i �. S i Fi.L7 i . ir.6c,c, ; i . c� ; ; �.a ; i.� ; �. � ; a.� ; E. �� ; 1 ? . 7C�0 � S .U � 1 2G I 2.8 I 3.31 t�.6 I 6. 48 f ' i l . IIC�C� 1 1 . 0 l I �.C� � 3.5 � 4. Et� 0. 7 � E.54 1 11 . 30�' � 1 . G � � �. 6 � �.9 1 J.Ji 0.8 � E.S� � 7 1�. Oir"v 1 2. C� 1 I 3. 0 ; 3. '3 { E. '3� 1 . 0 1 E.65 ; i'�. 1�)t; i '�. �� i �. f� � 6.4 i S. 'd i 1 .."-.� i Fi. S..�i i ', i2.2C�U � 4. U � � 6. C� � 3. 1 � SZ31 2 . E � ?. C: � � 1'<. �UO I 5. �� 1 � 5. 0 � 14. 5 1 18. 1 � 1 . 8 I 7.U'3 � i 1�. '�� i Fi.��i i 11. �) i s'.�1.4 i �J.Ji �. 1 i 7. 18 i �'� 5(0I'�0 � 6.O� I 12 U � �8. 7 � ^03(�.�4''/ � c.`y. .^-� � 7.28 I t� 1..IVC� 1 �� UI 1 SU� O 1 JJ�� 1 JO� / 1 L� J 1 ��J� 1 ; i2. �aa ; �. o; t �.a ; �s.c, ; aa. � � �.E ; �. �� ; 12.80Ul, � 3. U1 � 6. ♦C� � J6. J i �31 . E � :'. E � 7. �B/� I � �L�]� ��Vr, 1 L� ��1 1 �..1�l/� 1 J��J 1 �[�y�J 1 L� 1J I �� uA 0 I 1 ��.l� ��V 1 � � �� 1 1 J� t� 1 �J�� .I 1 J J� J 1 <� � I �� J� 1 ' 13. 1uC> � 1 . U � 1 �. 0 � 31 . � f 3E. 3� 2. 4 � 7.�1 � � 13. �UG � 1 . G � t 2.0 � 28.8 1 3�.51 �. 3 I 7.�8 � � 13.300 � 1 . G � � <.6 � 26. 3 f 30. 81 2.2 � ?.14 � ; 13.4C�U f 1 . C� � 1 i. G 1 i4. 0 1 i8. ^ot 2.. 2 1 7. ^tl t ' 13.S10� 1 1 . 0 � i 2. 0 1 21 .9 � 26.0� 2. 1 � 7. 18 � 13. 6U0 � 1 . C� � � �. 0 � 19.9 � 23.5I 2. Q I 7. 1E � � 13. 760 i l. u � f 2.0 � 18.0 � '?1 .3� 1. 9 � 7. 1� � 13. 80U I 1.01 � 2.0 � 16.2 � 20. 01 1.9 � 7. 11 � , 13. 5p0 � 1.0� 7 2.0 I 14.6 � 18.�� 1 .8 � ' 7. 09 � ' 14. 00p � 1 .0 � � 2.p � 13.0 � 16.E� 1. E I 7.C17 S ' 14. 10U f l.Ot f 2.4 � 11 .6 � 15.7� 1. 7 � 7. 05 f � 14.26U � 1.U1 I 2.� I 10.2 � 1�.6� 1.7 � 7. 03 � . 14. 3GA 1 1 .0; � 2.0 � 9.0 � 12. 2� 1 .E � 7.01 � � 14.400 1 1. U1 � �.O i 7. 3 � 11 . 01 i.6 � 6.98 � � 14.5�0 ; 1. 0 � � 2.0 � 7. 1 � 9.9� 1.4 ; 6.90 � 14.600 � 1 .C�t � 2.0 � 6.5 I 9. 1 � 1.3 � 6. 84 � � 14.700 1 1.01 � 2. 0 t 6. 1 � 8.5� 1.2 I 6.80 � �' 14.80G � 0.0� � 1 . C1 f 5. 1 � 7. 1 � 1.0 � 6.7G � 14.90p I 0.0� � O.0 I 3.6 � 5. 1 � 0.7 � 6. 56 1 , 15. 000 � O. U� � 0. 0 f 1.6 � 3.6; 0.8 � 6. 4E � 1�0 f O. �t � O.0 f 1 .9 � 2. E1 0.4 ; 6.38 � 1 .,. �C�6 I O. O; t O.0 � 1 .3 t 1 .91 Q. 3 � 6.33 I 35.300 � 0.0� � O.O � 1.0 S 1.31 0.2 I 6.23 � ; 15.4�0 � 6. 01 � O.O I 0.7 1 1 .0� 0. 1 � 6.27 ; � ----------------- ------------------------------------------=----------- � � POND-� Versian: 4. 03 S/N: 88��47'31 Fage S �f 6 d File: C:NEWPOND .FND EXEC:UTED: 0�-18-1'd53 Infl��w Hydrograph: 4: 8131A .HYD I5: �5: �1 Outfluw Hydragraph: C:NEWFOND . HYD INF�OW HYDP.OGRAPH _________________ROUTIN6 COMPUTATIONS ----------------- ------------------------------ � TIME � INFLOW � I I1+I2 � 2S/t. - O � 2S/t + O � OUTFLOW fELEVATION � � Chrs) 1 Ccfs> � 1 Ccfsl ; ' Ccfs� 1 Ccfs) f Cft ) � --------' --------' ' --------' ---Ccfs7--- ' ---------- ' ---' -------- ' � � � - � - � - � ------ � - � S 1P,.SOU I C�. 41 1 C�. C1 f G. 5 � 0.7 i 0. 1 I 6. :'S � �' 15. 60C � O. Ot � 0.0 1 O. �i � 0. 5� O. 1 I E. 23 I 15. 70G t 0.01 t O. G � p. 3 � U. �3 � O.G � 6.�2 � 15. 80U � 0.0� t O.C� � O.� � 0. 3� 0. � I E. �2 1 ' 15. 9C�p ! 0.G 1 � C).0 1 U. 1 � G. i:1 U. P t 6. ::i � � 1G. 00C� I 0.0f l 0.0 1 D. 1 1 U. 11 0.0 I 6. '�1 � . 16. 1GU � U. O � 1 u.0 I G. 1 1 U. 11 O. 0 � E. �1 I f 16.200 � O. G � I O. C1 1 O. 0 � C�. 1 � O.l� � E.2U � ' lE. �GO ; 0.0� 1 0.0 � U. 0 ! p.01 O.0 I 6. 2G I 1E. 40t� I G.t> I f C�.t1 I 4. 0 l U.U � 0.(i � 6. ct7 � � 16. �C%C� � U. G� I �. 0 � O.h � U. U � 0. 0 I E.�C� f ' lE�.E,v� � U. U � � Q. 0 I C�. 0 I �. t�1 0. 0 I E. '�:� � 1 lE. 7i�U � C�. C� I � O. C� � U. 0 � �.G; 6. � f E. �C� f � 1E. aD0 � G. 01 I O. 0 I U.0 � O.C � �. 0 1 6. �0 I 1 16.5UG 1 U. 0 � � C�.C� � C�.U f 0. U � U. 0 � E.2C> � 7. 040 I C>. UI � 0. 0 � 0. 0 I 6.0 � O.t1 � 6. GC� I . iC�U � p. Ul I , U. C� I O. 0 � O.nl O. C� � E.2p � � 7. 2h0 � G. C� � � 0. 0 � 0. 0 t 0. 0 � �.0 � 6.20 � ' 17. 30U 1 U. U � � U. 0 � 0.0 l C�. O � U. 0 � E.�U � 17. 4U0 � U. C� � � U. 0 � Q.0 � 0. C�I U. U � 6. '�0 � { 17.SC�G I U. U � ; t:. C� � O. 0 � 6. 0 � O. G � 6.2C� ; ' 17. 6CJn � 0. 0 � � 0. 0 I �`. G � �.tY� �. Cl � 6. 2� ; � 17. 7C�0 I O. U � � 0. 0 I �. 0 � 0.01 0. 0 1 E. 2Q t 17.80C� � 0.01 1 0.�7 I O. 0 � O.t� l 0.0 1 6.20 I t 17.9C�0 t �.U � 1 p.0 { 0. C� I 0.0 { 0. 0 I 6.20 � I � 18. QU0 � 0. 0 � f 0. 0 � O.C1 I d. 0� C1.Q 1 6. 20 � 18. 1n0 � O.G; � U. 0 � G. C1 1 U. O� O.O � . 6.20 1 7 18. 2t�0 � 0. 01 � 0.0 � 6.0 � 0.0� 0. 0 7 6.20 � � 18. 300 � O. GI � 0.0 ; �.6 � n.�t O. 0 l 6.20 � 18. 404 � O. U � � O.0 � 0. 0 � O.Of 0.0 � 6.20 � � iB.5G0 � p. Ot � 0. 0 I 0.0 � O.OS 0. 0 � E,.2U f ; 18. 600 � O. Ot � 0.0 � 0.0 � 0.01 0. 0 ; 6.20 � � 16.700 � O.O� � G. 0 � 0.0 � O. a� 0. 0 I 6.2d 1 18.800 � 0. 0 � � 0.0 i O. 0 � 0.0 � 0.0 ; 6.2U � � 18.9�G � 0.01 � 0.0 t Q.O � 0.C11 O.0 f 6.G0 � � 19. 040 1 0. 0� � 0.0 � O.O � O. C� � O. p � 6. �0 � 19. 100 � O.Ut � O.0 1 O.O � 0.01 0. 0 � 6.20 � �� 19. 200 ; O.O� � O.O I O. d 1 O.O� O. G I 5. 2� � ' 19. 3U0 � O.Ut � O.O � O.O � O.O� C�.O � 6.20 � 19.4U0 1 O.Ot 1 0.0 t 0.0 � O. OS O.0 I 6. 20 � 19.�00 � O. U � t 0.0 I 0.0 � 0. 0� 0. 0 I 6.20 � 9.6U0 I 0.0� � O.O t O.O ! 0.0� O.O � 6.20 1 7d0 � O. O� ; O. 0 � 0.0 � O.Ot 0. 0 � 6.�6 t 1'3. 900 � 0.0� i 0. 0 � 0.0 � d.0� 0.0 � 5.20 � t 19.900 l O.Oi � 0. 0 � 0.0 � 0. 0� 0. 0 I 6.�6 � ' �6.OUQ � O.U� � 0.0 � ' O. Ot 0.0 I 6.2U � - ----------------- ------------------0-0-�----------------------------- i r ' ND-2 Version: 4.03 S/N: 8802Q731 F'age 4 c�f 6 (�nd File: C: NEWPOND .PND EXECUTED: 03-18-1393 Inflow Hydroqraph: G:8131A .HYD 15: 45: �1 �utflc�w Hydre�graph: C:NEWPOND . HYD INFLOW HYDP.OGRAPH ROUTIN6 COMPUTATIONS I I ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------ 7 TIME t INFLOW I I II+I2 � 2S/t - 0 � 2S/t + O � OUTFLOW � ELEVATIONI � Chrs'l I Ccfs7 I � ' ' Ccfs? � (cfs) � Cft ) I -------- ' --------' , _Ccfs7-- ' ---Ccfs7---' ---------- ' -------- ' --------- ' � � �- � - � - � - � - � � �O. lUO � O. C�� t C1. 0 � Q.� � C�. t� l 0.0 I E. �O � � �0. �0� I 0. 0� � O. 0 � C�.G � 0.0� O. 0 I E. �t� � �0. 3UU I 0. 0 � 1 0. 0 � O. 0 � 0.0� O. 0 � E.2U � � �C!. �+Ut7 � O.O I � t1. 0 � O.0 � p.O 1 O.� � E. <C� ; ' 26.SUU I C�. O � t U. 0 � O. 0 � �.� 1 �. 0 � 6. 20 � � �O.E�nU � Q.Of ; O.G 1 C7. � � O. h � O. p � 6. 2G t 2d. 700 � U. UI I G. 0 ; 0.0 � n. 0� U. C� I 6. �C� � � •�n, gU0 � O, U � I �.U 1 0.G � G�. 0� u. o t E.2U t �� bti�. �6G � J. C�I � U. n 1 O.O 1 0. 0� C1. C� � E. �C> � 21. 00i.� � O. G � I O. 0 l tl. 0 1 C�. q � t_�. 0 I 6.<0 l � <^1 . ;UU 1 Q. U � I O.G 1 C�. p I O.G � t�. 0 I E. 2U ; ' �'I . cC�U � O.C� � � O. C� I 0.0 � 0.0 � G.0 � 6. �i.t ! ' 21. 3i�U I U.C� � � C�. 0 f G. � I O. C� � G.0 � E. �O � � �1 . 4t?U � O. C1� � U. C� 1 O. 0 I 0.0 � C�. V { 6. �:J I , t 21.5U0 � 4. C� 1 � G. C� I O.Q I O.G1 O. 0 � E.2U ; 6C�C� 7 0. 01 I O.0 I 0. 0 I U. u � t?.p f 6. �:1 I . 7UU � U. UI I U. 0 � �. h � O. OI U. 0 f E.�O 1 � 21 . 80ci � 0. �71 � 0.0 � 0.0 1 0. 0f p.0 � 6.�� t ' ^1 . 9C�U � C�.UI � p.d � O.C� 1 O.U� 0.0 � 6. 2C> t «. C>OU l 0.0 � � n. 0 � 0.4 I d.� l 4. 0 I 6.�C� 1 ; «. 100 { U. UI � U. 0 I U.Q I 0. �1 d. C> � 6. 20 � ' 22 �C�O I U.0 � � U.O 1 0. C� � O.0 � O. 0 f 6. �t7 I � ^^. ^ ' G.U � � O. G � 0.0 � O.C� � U.C� f E. 20 f ��. oOU � . �2. �3pn � O.U� ! U. 0 t 0.6 � 0. 0 � O.0 t 6. �6 � 7 i2. SC�C� I O. 0� � 0. d � 0. 0 � 0. 0 1 0. 0 � E.20 I ' 2�.600 � d. G ; I 6.0 � O.0 i 0.01 O. G � 6. <� 1 22.70d � O.G � � O.G � 0.0 t O.OI U.0 � 6.20 � � �2. 800 � �.01 � O.d ! 0.0 � O.OI O.0 1 6.2t7 � ' 2�.9U0 � O.p� I U. O � 0. 0 I O.O� 0.0 I 6. <U � � 23. �00 t 0.0� 1 O.d I O.0 � O. G� O. 0 � 6.20 7 23. 1OU � 0.6� f 0. 0 � G. 0 � 0.0� O.G I 6.20 2 I 23.200 � O. Q; � 0.0 � 0.0 � 0.01 0. 4 � 5.20 � ' 23.300 � 0.0� I 0. 4 � 0. 0 1 0.0� 0.0 t E,.2d � 23.400 I O. OS ; 0. 0 � 0.0 � 0.0� O. 0 � 6.<^c� � � 23.500 � 0. 01 I O.0 � 4. 0 t 0.0� O.O � E.20 � � 23.600 � 0. 0� f 0. 0 f 0.0 1 O.Q� 0. 0 � E. 20 � 23.700 � O.O� � O.O � Q.0 I 0.0� O. 0 � 6.20 � t 23.800 � O.O; � O.O ; 0.0 1 0.0� 0.0 � b.�0 � ' 23,900 � O. U� � �. 0 t O.0 � 0.0 � 0. 0 � 6.20 I � 24.00�0 { O.dt � O.O � 0.0 � 0.0� 0.0 � 6.�4 f . 24. 1OC� ; O.QI � O. 0 � U.0 � 0. 01 0.0 I E.2U 1 �UO I 0.0 � � O.O f 0.0 1 O.V� O.O � 6.20 { � 4. 3UG � 0. 0� � 0.0 � 0.0 S 0. 0� O. 0 � 6.24 f 24. 400 I O.O� � O.O � 0.0 � O.OS 0.0 � 6. 20 � 1 24.SGU I 0. 0� t 0.0 � 0.0 � 0. 01 0.0 � 6.2Q � ' 24. 6U0 � 0. 0� � O.O � 0.0 � O.Q� 0.0 1 6.2P � � ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ' If-'OND-� Versic,n: 4. 0� S/N: 88020791 F•age 5 c�f 6 �nd File: C: NEWPOND .F'ND EXECUTED: U3-18-1593 Inflc�w I-lydr�graph: C: 8131A .HYD SJ7 �J: 41 Outflc�w Hydre�graph: C: NEWPOND .HYD 1 INFLOW HYDROGRAPH _________________kOUTING COMPUTATIONS ----------------- ------------------------------- � TIME f INFLOW � t I1+I� ; �S/t - 0 ; �S/t + O � OUTFLOW �ELEVATIONI � Chrs) � (cfs) I ; _Ccfs? 1 ' Ccfs) � Ccfs) � Cft) � --------' --------' ' -- ' ---Ccfs)---' � � � - �- � ----------- � ---------� ---------t 1 �4. 7n0 � U.U! � 6.0 I G.0 � 0. 01 0. 0 t E. �O 1 ' 24.806 ; O.O; I 0.0 � O. G � O. Q� 0. 0 t 6.�G � 24.900 � O.U; � 0. 4 � 0.0 � O.U1 0.0 � 6.20 � t �.�,.U00 � d. � ; ; O. C� � 0. 0 � 0. 0; 0. 0 t E. 2C� � �t �5. 16G � p. Ol � �. � I 6. 0 ; 0.0 � 0.0 ; 6.�C� � 2�.20p t 0.� ; � 0.6 1 0. � 1 O.O; 0.0 � 6. 2C� � . �.�,.3UU � 0. U� � 0.0 1 t�. 0 � 6. 0 � p. 0 I 6.2p � � 25. 4U0 � 0. � � 1 O.d I O. p ; O. O� U.0 � E,. 20 � � 25. 500 � 0. 0 ; ; 0. 0 I O.p � G. 01 0. 0 � 6. �C I I 25. 60� I U. O � � G. �> I O. 0 � G. O � G. 0 I E.<<� I 1 �5. 70C� I O. UI � h.d � 0.6 � O. Gt O. 0 � 6. <C� � �1 �5.3G� 1 0. ��; ; G.v ; �.G � O. U ; r�. 0 � E. �O ; 1 �5. 90U � C�. U I I 0. 0 1 U.U { 0. U � C�. C� 1 E,.2U I ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------ � Feak Inflow = 6. 0 cfs Peak Outfl��w 2. 6 cfs Peak Elevation = 7. 38 ft � '' � ', � � 'I � � � �• 1 ' �. FOND-� Versian: 4. 0� S/N: 880207��1 Page 6 af 6 � Fond File: C:NEWPOND .PND Inflow Hydre�graph: C: 6131A .HYD Outflow Hydre�graph: C:NEWPOND .HYD EXEGUTED: p3-18-1593 ' Feak Snflow = 6.0 r_ fs 15: 4�: ti1 Fe�k Outflow = 2.6 cfs Peak Elevation = 7.3B ft � Flaw Ccfs) O. Q 1 . 0 �.p ^o. � �.O 5. 4 E. 0 7.0 8.0 �.O 10. 0 11 . 0 � ------ ' ----- ' ----- ' ----- '- ---- ' ----- ' ----- '----- '----- '----- ' ----- ' . � � � � � � � � � � �- � � 11 .7 - � r. + i Y. '�F ' 1. 8 - 1 >: * i Y. 'K' ll. j - i Y.�1E ' i Y. 'x' . �1 � !, '�`' _ � i Y. '% '�+'. 1 - � . iF � 7: ` i Y. '1F li.G - i X '�' • i X *' �' i iF J % 1 x � • '� - � Y. �1F i Y. '� C � ' 1. .� -� Y. iE i 7: 'X- , , 6 -I >: * !2.7 � x * * _ � � x * ' G. B - i Y. '� i X 1^L'. 5 - i '1f' Y. ! �r x � 3. 0 -t * x 1 * x � �. 1 -� * x t * x .�]. �s -i 'x' Y. i '1F X �J. .�, -i �' X i iF X SuJ�� l *' X 1 � x � .�i.`J - i 'K' X i 'K' X � 1 * y I * x 7 -i 1�' X i �' X 3. B -1 * x t � * x i3.9 -� * x TIME .�m. a��A� � �ann � �r rQioi � � � �Ii � �o� ,� �� rr�� C O � � � � H LT1 H z � a , , _N , , cA 9 � c _ N ° .. _ " �y � � � Q p _P � d . v, , , � �"_ _ � _ " ^ d! �! 0 '9 � w w �+ .�r � .. �y t � .°°9 /` ^ 9 � 0 .. .. r_ ? � o 0 0 � �j � �... J 4 - � � ° v _ ,. �_ � � . � � • . , � � � � N p. J = . _ 9. J` • p .0 _N C. N .. v+_ � o � `j ° - _c a � � � p; �' � � _ _ r � 1 0 7' ' � ; Y! c � _r 7 � �,�, aa _ a._ ;f ....(� JI. � . ..0 n... N __. .._. . � d � : . .......� - . .__ . ... 0 Jl � � O � 9 � � �' ~ � ' , ;. . ' O T: �(? Vi m J � d _ . o, � w J'. , �. � > T a N . i g � � � � � ._ c e � � o o ...Q �_ p _f!� �. � _ 9 ._ �9 w � IP � � � w � .. . � � W o_ � c_ _ . � _ -r m w � w � � o � � �7i v .� N Q- � ro o = < _ -�- ol U U _ . -^ .. _ . .... . . � .. , . ' 4 _ � \ Y. r � �. , i C O. N `� �. ca ¢ : � � �... 1'n . p .O �.. .. . r � ...,� N � .... �_ N ._. .. . .9 _i S. � Q � � S � . � _1. z £ y �_ W N N N. _ � W £ e _Q W. < @ _ � � � r � ', � d o � _� � _� . ._I �. C c � � `., _' „�'N � �i d� O O �p �p dp 1- � y Y �O.r � I 6 �NQ00 ; r � � � �� _V" ' ..Q � � � .{. � W �� , , ..... . . __. ,. r _. � . Q_ r ._ �.... .. . ;.. .. , . B , � YJp.. . .. . , . .. . . _ ... ._. i . , _ � '�. N 6 0�O � y� . � Z Mg�� _ F � . , _ � z U a Q - � _ 0 o µ � - W .7. _ V` �, __ �.. , y _o� � - ` , � — N � p � � v'. 9 p,. a sL` . _ _ � � r = I� u w � . � . � � . — — ' ; , �_ i vo�.Jw�£� �o ,rnP ��ta'Tta�JS . . . .,- , SECT._ L6uC'�-1. ' " ; ' - � � , 'ELEti !1—� EiEYf � 'q � ' 'ELb�/ . �ll—\O ; 6�.EY . �O; .. �\ � � . . ; qTSE+1 : RY�i. AitBfl 1NC. Yo4 flREP1 RVfj.iqR.EA uoC. voa.; A2E� HY6• :A52EP ��u�'. vo�.. Fy1zE-4� Ay6. �ltibp 1•,+C+: JQt. . _ _ , . _ �7 : :.. . � il 3r7, �l 5 Zz,.S: �S�l•5 _ -Sb Z8 �180 �2,�y qoj..... 1`lt5 ']2' c<Z S Z18!l5 . ._. ,. . __ � . .. . � . �/: �: � . .. _ . z� 53 . _ ' � .m _ , . _ . �� - ...... _ _.... ._... __ . _ o. . :. __ . ; � . . . � �— _ __ . _ . :_ _ _ . . ._ � '-'�� _ __ _. . _. . _ _ ,. . .. __ . � ._. . _ _ . ' _ . , ... .. -Tv3AL,rj ...... e__ '1�'7 S ' _.. a/80 .� � . ` ..... . I� l�j � .... . �.. _ _ Z18�7 � ... . _ .} : . .._ . .__ _ . . __ .. ._ . . -_ � . .... i_. :............. . �..... ...._....., � , _............ . �...... ' _ . _ .. _ _ ' . . .. . . 0 , � [ : ... ;.. .. ._..._ :._ � � . . :__ , . :__. : __.. t... '.....__.. `_ . . ;.. . 1..... _ . ' ' : ' � '� . . . ...._ , , .......... . _. _..._. . :.... :i , ': : ! ' ' ' _.. . ... . � . ....... �._. . ...... �....... . � . _ " ' � _ . .. _ - - . .. .. � . ^� y' ..... ._ .......... . .... _........ . ..... . '_. . ............. � 1 ' . .. . _ .__ . . '1 ": . ;.__ ...... �_ ...__ : : � . . . .... ___.. . _ ' ;._ ............ . � : ........ _<__ . . �....... �. . - . . . __ _. _ . . . .._ _. . . . . ,........ �.. .;........ ' ; � _ . ,._. ... , � : _ -........ . l.. . , , . �.... ' , . �._. _ _...... ._ ,_ ............ : :.. ........ .... ..... .. . ... � ;. . __. _ � _ . _ . _ -- . . ..._.. . ....... ... � ,. .. �... :.. . _. , ;__ . __ _. PS�aPo�E.s� co...►p_�-{'1a�i S . � . ;... � . _ ; _ . , :_ . , _ we PQoR�S�D S7oP � SHoD �i62�A : , ;. EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES� INC. �EETNO. � oF � " Christopher R. Mello PLS � . . ...... . , . .. . . . : �� . : . : . .. . ��. . � _ .. . ; ... i . , : 40 Lowell Street ca�cuureoer -1um w,re 3-t'S-�A ; _. ..: I ' PEABODY, MASS. 01960 .- . . _ . . _.. . . �I . . : . , . : , . .. . . } . I �_.. �SOB� S3S�SZP1 � G/ECKEOBV C�M DATE � . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . �. . . . .. . . �{ . ' � SCALE C.6VISLn 4-Zd-9c � . . . . ' ' ' t:� :. _ _ ___._... . ...__.. _ .. _.._ -- _._ ____ ._. _ _. ._ � _ .; ..... :_ _ . � . :. ,.._. . �� ........ ...�;. ...._ � ;_ ..�/C? � �v*-'�� ; co Y-m S'.v�AT�o_.1 S . -- - � S�eTtow� L6*1�T� _ ' ` � ' ' : , �L��hZ�ou `I: �0 8 ,' �LEvo.-r�ov $ '�o :9 �va.-iioi�l q -ro �O i �L6�/.A-f1 O�i �O -�o �� : _ _.._. _... AEEA s /��LC ;�QER 1N�. �IOL. QQ�.4 !, I1YG. �SL�A 1Nc. �OtF ,4¢E` aV6• Id�,EA INC. 40`•, � AKFfa � AV6 . 11REA �NC- l,lOi. � � K , � I�� ._. �. ....__ :_.. '� .:___.. __ _ Y_._. _._..... . ' ... ..__ . - - - �- --- - - - --- -- -- -- --- --- --- 60 . d � ; o p -._._ ._. O _ .._ O . . ........... �� ` �; � �'� 1'� � � � � . : . ..._ . , �_. , .....__.._� �_ - ....._ . ...: � :.._..__.. � . ..i_._ . .......... _.. ..._ .. .._..... _.._ .... . . .... _. . ' _ � _ . Q �....... .._ Z� _ 1_O - zA�o `l"Zb z4. o ; � c� , .... o.. .Z. , _2-�t� _.. . ��.5. � : � -_... ' � Q ...,_. . ' ! _ .Zµ _ -Z 1 31Z- ; � S ...... -t .g ;.1 Z,'l.9...._ . z ,5 121;,y _ - -- � ; . . '�, �. . Z� :. ��_ ..._.. __. , 35 � : r�► ; s, 5 ; ►2. :_ ' 31 - _ } S-�.. � `3-�s � ,�', .g .__ 29i ^5 . ; ., ' 16�5 _ 9& t 3l 1� .._ � : _ '� ._.. '� _ _ _....... ; 25, 31 - �� : \ \. . ... iA- . _ ,-� �. --95 --...._ . � ' _...._ s`4- , '- z5 . ._. .._350 ._ �-� - ��--- _ � ..._. ._ � . ..... ' �'__._ ' 'z5 _ -3t -- - -- - :__ _ .__.. - - - - - - - --- - -- - - - - - : ' : __.... ..� , , P -1._.. ! •-j.. Y 4-�-- t co o ;.. - - - ; SS=-- : : - � 5 :- 3tg - -- - -18�j- - -ln ��- - '?.2}- ;- -�t&-- - - — -- - �..4a :.:.:... 8'Zo i �ZS S ; , '� a� t?; - -- �_- _ _. _ � zfl-- : - , , �z o -- _ . 22i � y- : �, S 42�Z.5 � : , — .... . _ -35 ::::::, _ ; _..... Z :_. r�_•}p.. ....._... „_.� _, "'�ls- 2ttcS `15Y1..S._ _.. Z2lo - --9-�tc3-- - - - ------ 2 _ cZ—_., y o :_.__ ' ' �;-- _ �t-is .___ _ _ • '� ' ; SO:._...... _..._ 3 � YSSo ____ Z 5 �,�5 Z � ......... '�"�-S _'l�`�5.._ _ �� _ `l-4�D__. - - - '7 c.25 ; � _.._ � ' , , _ � ` �i2 _.. o.._.. _15 : 4so � �` �. '1 p � _ __5 l 3.o�n ....... � .......... � , }� `1S ; 450 ....... r-�� ._. �.�Z _ _._-"� _. ._.. , 80 _ ` 6p......_ . ' . gp� _ s� , . ; .�¢........ _ �,Z S. e.... ISoo ......... 'Ce8 _ 1ce32 i � '}arr�g._. qFj'�-Z _ � -18 :_ _. U ' �5 ,_ .. ' Sc�, ;.�1 . _ _ ,� �sz�r 'l2 , _ _ : _ . '-tz! ; , ; _._ , . : __ . , , _ _. I' S��ET To�oLs ' ' 49s.�•5 ; '�_'� . 35,00''� . _.. Zli-,542.5. . __ � .__. ..... . . _ . ;_ ; ,...... . . __ . _, . . _.... ; ^ _ Z98�y;5 __ _ ; �onosEb � � - � - ...... � . - ... , �..� . .. �oe PRoPO5E9 S-tOP E�S�-loP i=8�31fl ' , co,vorrioN S i EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. . Christopher R. Mello PLS sneerr,o. s oF 4 ' ' 40 Lowell Street cn�cuureoev a�1�v� OATE 3-+5 -9'j _.. . PEABODY, MASS. 01960 _ �� _ ' ; � ; ; ,� : ; : ; �, : �SOH� �JSLSiZS CHECKEDBV_ GOM DATE� :... _ ..... . .. :._. . : . � . . ;......... ' � . . _ _ ,. ; , .... ..... � . . ........... SCALE `�O U E F54G11TF�NMNfTF�YANKfTE4rfl�ITFWeI�alz.,fPm.Wfi0N11.1eGEe�RQNf;Mt!AF[I�1Tl� . . . . . . . . .. . � � f ; : Lv co m C'vTQTto +1 S . . .. �. . - , � , . ;. ._ . . .: _ : . . - . � ...� :. ...., . �.''�_E . . . .. - _ . .;.... :. e :_ .. - � _ ' . . . ...___ i.._. ;:_. $�c'Cio`l LE*��7�} . I, i ,' ' ' ,: ; ; ? ; I . �'� tLEvhTowi ; `t- �q 8 _ �Lsvn.�,;ov� 8 -ro ;� � I �� L�sva.�ioN �q : -ro 10 s �LG�/iA—f70N : �O �o � � i EL6YA-t�o�1 : �1 -io : �Z �. _ . _.._.. :.. . . . . . . . : . . : . , . . . : . . - - A2EA : .. hVc. .A¢bq tNe. �to�. 4¢�A pVc. AtLEA 1�1c. YOL, �{ZE� �VG. ':AQE11 nle VO�. AR�P. : dv6 . A2EA �Nc. yot, . . � ! ,�OWiE�_ ..__. O :. ........ ...... . « _..... . .__.. :.... ' : . ' � � _ ' .. -......__ • _ __._ ` _ _' '__.._ ... ..__. ._ _, _ _ _ ....__. �_. . . ,. - _. _. . _..... ST• 3� —_ b o _ � � c� o �: _ o ' o � cocp z442 a iv9 �z53 _. � __._ _ — _. _ _ _ A : � � .. . � � 3? 33 s - 5(0 _ p C'd. _ O � � ' �'� "T'L8 _ _ 181 ... ��.3� ' 3tn6 _ z.o,coo8 . 3 : o ; _ _ Q __ 2� , z3a , , : 358 ; ' ' 5 � _ C� ;... �... __ r5 5 ;__ �83.5 ... : Sco 3i92,_ . _ ZS'�.S 14 e.'16 3E.4 _ 20�"148 e _ ' 0 3 � a ; �s:s _- 330 ;. 4�:_ G� e7... �� S 15�:5 ; 51':5 zs2y -... ' 22S•S_ ij,t� t, : 305 14,94�5_ � o. o. _.__ ;_ � � _ . ��z _ z8o 50 _ ; � _ d , _ tS 150 � 49. 5 z4'15 ._ . _. 233.5... i�.�'l5 _ z:g55.._.__. . t4,�'1_�•._ _ � ._.... O. . 30 , ;.g� . 295 3ti � 3 8 :......... c7 _. .__c� _.._.. i S . _ _ . �'7-0 : � , `�'l a,: �l�_.. _ ZSz.�... �tS95� 3,t - ►�-,8 �8.. ... .. : _. o ..: ..... ' Z i_o . .._ � :.._.. G : *�(�p __ ' - .3 i i : ; _cz. ' ` ��.....__ q ...... . _.. ......o _ . �_._ ' C� _ _ 1�t� : GS'2o..._.. Z53 5 __ —18z19'�� G . .__ U:... _ Q U - _ - - ---- 2'1l0_ O. , 3 s . O . _...._..C? _ U Q... -- _ 1,� , 3Ea0 .. 228 : ..- — 9.0 c.i(. _i . 1b __ __....1.{ ___ ' _ € - � ` ' I,f� -- _ � SO '. . _ `o _.. o... ;......... � , ; � ; I . _.. . , - _...... :_ - - - - � ... .... . �. .... _. _. . _..... - - - _ �--�-! o ._ . p ' _ _ zo . _ . ..... ; � p � ' i . _ ; ... -35: _ p . � ' O . _ O _ . ` 3_ �1oS ..._.. 4"Lo �...o - _ 350 ...._ D�- 12 � ; _.... G .... ' _ C� : , ,' �, _ ' �'.¢ ... _ , O, ; ; ' ___ ' :_ ` '.._ � ' _ ;' , ' I �_ _ _ _ ; . . _ i � i +( , � I ; : 1 ' I ! o 'c� z�co3 c< �&C3�-c c.1 ;34Zc� . 1tc.- 35 S' ! ; ; . ; _ __. , : _;. _ ; : - , . : , , - ' . . ��:. .: . . . :.... .: . . .i !._. '... ' : �. . , _i �' �� - � I : � . . � ; � - : . . � , . : . . . ., , . . , . . . : . . . . : . . . . . _ . � . . � ! PQOPo S�r� �. � . � � - - � � GC�^�1 �1"'f)O�IS ' '� : �oe PROVo5E9 S-(oP E�S.NOP �8�31fl __ EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES� INC. SHEETNO. � oF ' Christopher R. Mello PLS ''� - : - ��. : : � - � - - � � '� - - 40 Lowell Street . cn�cuurEoev --1*a�+'i onre �-+5 -9� PEABODY, MASS. 01960 : �: ' �� ' . . ;.. ; . .. _ . -�. . . �..... . I ' (508) 531-8121 cHecKeoer e fa m onre � � . : . . : , . , - . ; . .;. .. . . . �... . . . . :... . �:.. : . . : - ' �. . . . , _ : , � . . , SCntE `1,0 41 E fWJfA'C�Y3:i�c'O��'[CGFI�ahVSiNF�i13��TFCLf1�qIrc.LMs;Mns01�)�.leO.R�PXNEl01llPEf1.6VRim90 � . . � .. . . ��' �.;: : , . . : . , I , . � '� ' . : . �Jo�.vwl£ ��':�;. �cornQU.tA`ilO�J � ��.. ; . '�;. ; . . �, . . . I,. ' . _. : . SEcT. I�NCTH � � � ' - . ; � : ' : �'. . � . . . , �: .. �� 'ELEr '1-8 ' ' � . BI.EY S -�l . : : ' fitb�/ : �/�-1O ! . �. EtEY :lOi - i\ ; . .. ' '. . �. • ATtEfl qYy. A4eR 1N�. VOi. �REq AYEa.AR6H �roc. voLi A2EA " AYC�• Al2EP �N�c.i vo�- H2E-t>: qy6. A2cp 1NC. JOL : - .. ;.. .. , _. . ; � ,,. ..... - . v 3.5' � � , � � o v 30 2� �i8o GO 5�.5 �� _ , , , _.. ,. , __ i9�-t.S.. .. � �: ;.o �' ; ' , o :. . _ __ . . _ . ...... �/ l _ , . Z b :. 5 3 ' i ' . _ _ __ ;_ _...... -c`v-cs+.t-.5 ; . o . ;.... ......_. : ... o ;_ _ ! `j.bo �... 191�1.5...... ; . > , . _ . .... . ....._. � , - -....... . .... . , . ; ; . � _ _ . . ....... ._ . i � : : � : � � � � i .� : : - � ; ; ; : ' i.� . , ...__. :.. ... . :_._ ....... _.. __ . . -__ . .... _ .. .. _ .. __ _ _ .. _.._... : .... . ..._.... ( .. ...... � °___. _. _._ � , _._ ..... ....... _..._ < ....__ __ < �Xl�`(1 �C� �4.!�1f�IZ10.!��, � .._.... �... . ._ _ .. , � . ..l._ ;......... �� . � �__ ____.. : : : : �: _ ....5 _.. _ .. . . . _ _.. .. _ ._ _. _ . � ,.. . .. .. _ .. . . .. � �-��_ . . _ ..... .... ... . ... , .._. _ _.. I . _._ _ ._ _ . �.... .._ ..... : < .... . .. L�.... .. _ --. � , .._ ;_. .... _ ._.. ; ....... . :. < ....... � �.... . < . ... �. _ . _ . �. . . . . . � , . �. . . - _ .. .... . : . .. .... .. . . . : �.... .... .... . :... . :.......... . . :.... . ._. ...... . . . ... , . . ._._ :_ _ . .__ , . . : . ... �..... . ...... , ._�.. . _.. , _ .. . . . . .- . . ._._ . . . , .__. . ..._ . � , . � , : -. . ; , : : . : : : - _ i � :_. : � -: . : : � . � : ;._.._... . €... :.......... . �_.. . . . i....... ..i '.._.... . � ._._. ..;_ . ....__. • r__`_.. . . _ .. . � .. _ .. ... ...... ._ .... ..... ...... �...._ . ' . .__ . ..... '... .. . .. .. .. _ . ...... ... _ F . _ _ . . _ __, . . _ . . k_ . _ : . � : . : . . :_ : __ : : . . � - _ . - F . _ _ ._ . . _ . _ : � � . , ,- . ._ , _ : ;: . . . : : . . � . : . � : : . _ . . _ . : . � . . . . . . . _ � . _ -- � � - . - . � ' - � . EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. �e� fLoR�s�D SToP � SHOP 'FiaC�n • ' Christopher R. Mello PLS �EEfNO. 3 oF � , � ..... ° � 40 Lowell Street . ca.cuuTeoer -1ur» �� 3-t5-�D ' ' ' ' ' " PEABODY, MASS. 01960 _ e ; ;. {: : , : . ;.. . �`�...... I �SOH� S3S-BiZl CHECNEOBY C4YN DATE . , . : : � . _ ' : �. ' . ' ' : 9 � ' � . '. . i . , � : . ' : � , �: _ . . ; I ��. � �. .. .;. SCaLE�EV�SLn 4—Z�'�IS xi..rr�„o.«......rs�mrnn�.��ww..nma.��_«....�....n.+.u�o.vmi��....xcw ._.... . ��i . . _ _ ._-_"_._. ......_.__._. . . _"'_ "_ _." "__._. . . .. ._.. . . . . . _. . . .. .. . _ . . �, _ _ . i ; . ' '_ a.... ' , \/o �_*-'� E comC�vTAT�ouS . S�CSIo+a LE+�1GT?-}. �': ' � : : ? ; : : _ , . _ - �1.5VhZ�o�.1 I `Z� �0 8 �tEVA.'7�OV 8 ?O � ,� ,.�EVAZION q -{0 10 � �t6V�A'"710N s \O -jc � t� : � . ..... A26A ; /�VG. :��R 1NC. VOI. p¢,�A ; AYG. AR.EP 1NC. VOt� �iLE �j QVG. ;AQEA 1�1C. VOL. R�P. : AV6 . AQEA �^CC. VOL. � A . __ , _._._ ._ a _... .... ;_ .......... , 0....__ ,__._ ......... _ "3 O . ._.. ! �� - - --- _ _ _ �o : o 0 2�1 . lto2p ..... 111 [ Gc,6o _. _ _ ; _ .__. - : , -- ° - , ._. _ k. _. o p_ _, ' -zq.�, _. , 12� -Z� . _: _ _ ,..._ C, p .. �� 3 �{.. 8} lo . �`12`.. s4l2S . __ __... � .. .. G p i ' ��+r�' ; . " 21 F1 - � sl : _ ` ; ; _t1.5..._ 6g ; �' ! �iz:9 .4`it8. _ ; __. z19 __ . la,,to5 _ I :. _ 3 M � 33 ' �4►� zzo �1 �� .4 Z,s.S_ �<:..... __ __4 � 2,�53 � ) Aio,S �?�Ss � N C� d 9 IS2� _ ' 21 `�1` ; i 'SS 5 ..:.. 'lrl-`� '_.. . 15� Z�'l•rj... 3o4S ..... . ..... . _ I t�!- :_ :. _ ._ _ ' � z, � , ...:. �2. ; l totol . ._. - 22(0 P . _.. o ; ° , :..... . . ._ . __ __. - -- __ ; � . .__ . ; _ : •2,F� _ • _. _ � � _. ° �__ , _: _.. _ _ . . ;_ ;_. _ -- - ---- _P I ;.: _ �z �c�cp� 2�� -- I o • ' _ �8 __ _... _ 3Cm _. . -2068 - j : �142.. --S231o;..._... _ Z2� ._ 1'Z,81� - c1 O __ � p : ' j-} � ' Z 21t - - - .__� _._.. 1.15 � ...__ s s.. -�q�5_...._ _ _ F,s o ._ _.. �5 . ._ ' _ , , ___ -- - � ' _. __ o s�z� ._ -i �z - - _ 2 _ � ; .� S - --- ; ; So;...... 4 : o -..._ C7 �...__ q-.5� Ir 2 _.. �� _ A3.00 .... � ....:._.. � ,__..__ ; . O . ' �._� c�! ..... Cno I 3 ! � .._ _ � ........... p ..... ! -_ `l`�. �4So .__ G4,S :_ 3Es`� ........ - ._.... i � C�. o -�!� . �o� . � _ . _. , ' G p ; 31�5 '`15to.__ __�4 .s ._ ��i s _ � � y . o ; ' ' 3�o _ . ; ce o - � , v � ; ,: � < _ __ i Sr-1EEZ �c:'T/��5. '�, �: - . ., - Q — C.�' . . .. . :. CeIOCa cF ' � _ �� . .31.�26(. cF -. �. , ' . ��: Gl 51�o cF�. : � ., � �. . ; � �. � '. . - : . � �� . . ; . ; . : _ � . I �,, j �: . .. . . � . . ._.. ;. ._ �_. :. ... . . _ : � �- . � . : . . �_ ' . . . . � . t ,. :- ... , . .: .. ,. ... i � � _ .� ' ' � � � � I . .... ... . . : � . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . : . . . ' ., . . ., . . , . . . , . . . . .. . : : � ' � ' . . ��C 1S-I 1 N C-t ' �: � . - - . � � .' ' � � CO�DIT:O�JS ' � � .... JOB�120VOSE9 �j-(Op E�SHOP t=8�31fl � _ EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. . � ' ' - ' SHEET NO, Z OF � = � -: - ' ' � � ' . Christopher R. Mello PLS � - -� � � �� - � - ' -�� 40 Lowell Street cn�cuureoev --1��+'� DATE 3-�� -O�� , ! _ PEABODY, MASS. 01960 , .... .. � . . _ :. . ._ ,, ; I �. , �HOH� H3S•HLPZ CHECKEDBV C11M OFTE I . :. : . . ;.. .. :.. : ' y... f . '. '.. .. . . -' ... ��... . - . , , , � . . i SCALE �O �.1 E � R��L�:'F:�.S'2:i'F0.3:VFFY[IMYIIhYNiT[CLfI niFS�.b�:..Grnn.W..Olql.lo0@aM1E@l/PfEIffiR:6Nf ' . . . . . , ' . . � : _I . . . , _ .. . , . . .' ' ' ; ', _ :. _. I �/o��.v � � . : comP,vZ:QT�ouS ; . . 'ECTtow� 1.E*1G1� � � . , �! ; . . � ; , _ _; i � � ' . � :_.. .. . _ ._. . .. ,. - . L-L�VhZ16�.1 �� `Z -�0 8 �tEy4.'f�OV 8 �o � ; F��l6Ve.Z10*-1 q ;-�o 10 ; �16V:A—f10N � �O '70 1� �LEVA-I10�1 IE 'TO 12 �� . �... , .. A2EA ! hV4. ��2ER INe. �[OL. pQ�A , dVC. �Tt�q INc. VOt. ,e,�2E� �: ,aVG. �i.A2�A 1�1C. VOL. AQ�P. `; AV� . 4¢EA ��ic. voc. A¢�.4 �: AVC-�. AtizEA �Nc. �IOt;. 1-�owLcY � _. _ _. . -- ._. _ o: _ . . ._. ......._.. ......... :... . � - :. ,- ..... . p . ..._..._.... ,_._._ . _._ O � . . e ._._.. -. - _ S-r. 3 b � co .S _ Q , 13 2 48S A- �(' . Z •5 i... QJZ 24 0 � �l .S 352 , __... �S __; 925 , . � . _ .. .._ < A s � 3-_ , o� ' . ; so zc4 ' Sco`._.. g ,5 _. 3Oa '20 :_ 1120 3o:.s 1 � 08 _... So , 2.Soo '.._ 23a .5,.. . �Zqo� ; z3 � 2 '�._._ t�2� S a 1 � � 5 �1�.... Co 3d2 z2 _ 125:4 � .40.:5 23oa . _... Sz� : Z85o _ ; 1`19.5 _ toz32_ . � � : : C ; _ C� ',. t `�i . ; 3°�� __ ; ; S d i co2 : ' ' 40� ._ ' '�j ' 14;..� ' ' !e .5 ... _ 4t `l ; 23 :5 . SIS2 __ •-11.5 ` 3SoA�...... . 1.�-Z _ '193a . �I p __.._ o -o _ ' 61 ._ o� -� Co2 ! So � __ ;.. ,....... _ . ; 12 �oo !..... 49 _. . ; 14�1 .... .. . `-345p. . ..... 4950, � _ ' ' o' _. o ._..... ' ! �cp ;..._ 1os � � � ; 38.;........ i _ '..._ ...__._ ;.... ; �' s'�o __ 1 04 � ,4_�...��._._... y..�o.s �a'1`Z � 15:... . � : . : __ � _ ' . � _ c�.. ._.. .. : t�-t� i� ?,� . _ 2o s : , � ' ' �2.: .. :_. . Fc� 5 o t3 __. ��o.� ;.. c85 t -- �5zo.� .__.. _ `�`l0'3; _ i _. c�. _ .. p ___ . � a; ..__ � o $ : � .. . toS "3 8� _ _ . .... _ ......_ .._... i 2 :... 45(o__.._. __. "13 '3�3l4 -.... �_o o S . . 3 S 4oj.. .._._ 1--t .__ ' , o;. _ . ' �.__... ' _ �� ,.._. , ' ` '�� _ � 3 ; 1-�-�.... a . ,... � o ; S _ ' ' � 6 _ �i 3 � 35 � _ . , ; � ' �1 .?5_ s95 ..... �......_ _ _. _� g r� 3045._ oj.q...S _ .. 330+� ' ; _5_ _....:-� � � � ' 3 v _.... ` o� ;�,........ ' ' �� ; j ' , . _ , _. ; ' � , : , ; , � , , _. _ , ; ; � ....... ....t.. � ' � :_.... .: ;.. ' � �. i . ._. � �:. . : ; . � - . :'_ .':� � �..._. ' :. I ' . , . , , : _ . : : ; . . _ : , ; � I � � � ; � , - : - _ : : , S,.�r_et : -To-tntis: SPi9 cF 3031 c� , : 6r7�4 cG 32cao1 cF : c�834�.Sc�� . , ; . , ' � . . . _>_. �. ._... . ,i . ' . . . : : .. ' . . , . � _ ' ... : : . . � � . �. i . i . � . . . . . .. I ..< � . i . , . . . . _ ..,.. : � . � , � . �. . . _ � . �: . ' ��C 1 S-(1 sl C� . . . _ � � � . . : � �. . COVDI"( 1'O�.IS ' ' � �oeQR_oPoSEv S-tOP � S*aoP �8�31A -- ( : EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOCIATES, INC. ; . . � . � � _ - ; � �� Christopher R. Mello PLS SHEETNO. � oF <+ I � � , � , � � � , - . � : . 40 LOWeII Street ca�cuu�eoev -1�-1m pnre �-�5 -9� : : : _ . PEABODY, MASS. 01960 . �� ' . . �� '. - . � - ,' � ��. �SOH� 53I-HLZL GHECKEDBV C flM DATE �H . . .. " - . .I . '. . � : � : . G. _. i. I �6 '._..._ . . . . . . . . . , . . ... ,. . . . . . . � . ' �SCALE `�O V E rxON6Tr.by&:ba�fU4Elvcr.C�Fti.qvaa:.?talq�)ss mm.PTonu -m c i.io,...H�.-I�kl:.[rnxh]]S��PO �___ . LL I i • • ATTACHMENT F RESOURCE AREA DESCRIPTION The property was assessed by Sommer Environmental Technolo- gies, Inc. ("SET") with respect to the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. Ch. 131, s40) ("WPA") and its regulations 310 CMR 10.00. The WPA requires that certain wetlands, ponds, streams, and adja- cent areas are to be protected as "resource" areas. Bordering vegetated wetland is defined as an area where over 50� of the plants are wetlands indicator species. Stream banks and areas subject to periodic flooding are also protected. The property in uuestion is located on Boston Street, Salem, and Ilowley Street, Peabody, Massachusetts. On several occdsions in April and May of 1994, Mr. Paul Sommer of SET investigated the subject property under the WPA. This investigation revealed several areas to be investigated as potenti-al resource areas on the property. The primary resource areas on or adjacent to the site are directly associated with the presence of the North River include; Land Under Water Bodies ("LUWB") (10.56) , Bank (10. 54) and Bor- dering Land Subject to Flooding (10.55) . The proposed project will not impact the LUWB. As identified in the 10.54 performance standards for LUWB "No alteration of water carrying capacity, water quality, fisheries breeding or cover or habitat will result from this project. " Activities proposed in the Bank area include construction of a 6-foot open channel with wingwalls which will discharge stormwater at low velocity (2-3 cfs) to the river edge. The total proposed disturbed area of bank is 15 linear feet or less . This proposed outfall is in compliance with the Bank Performance Standards (10.54 (4) ) . Specifically, the outfall will not effect the stability of the bank or the water carrying capac- ity of the channel. Due to the engineered design of the storm- water system, including MDC type catch basins and a detention area, the project will not adversely effect surface and ground- water quality. The alteration of 15 feet or less of this bank will not impact breeding or habitat for fisheries. Finally, this is a typical urbanized river bank. Field investigation of the area identified no significant areas of wildlife habitat. Yet, the project remains below the allowable threshold of 10% allowable in the 310 CMR 10.543 Performance Standards. The proposed project is situated within the flood plain of the North River. This project has been designed to provide for compensatory storage of flood storage in compliance with the Performance Standards for Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (10. 57 (4) (a) ) . The ro ' ect site was also assessed for the resence o p 7 p f Bordering Vegetated Wetland ("BVW") under 310 CMR 10. 55 and Isolated Land Subject to Flooding (10. 57 (1) (b) ) . Due to the isolating effect of the railroad bed, no areas of wetland vegeta- tion were noted as contiguous with the North River resource areas. in fact, only one location on site was found to support a vegetative community with an excess of 50� wetlands identifier species. This locale was identified as an abandoned railway spur (see Plan, area I) located in the northwest corner of the proper- ty. This spur is depressed below grade and appears to retain precipitation and runoff and is completely isolated from the North River. This area is dominated by Cattails • (Tvpha spp. ) and reed (Phyagmites communis) . Although the area supports vegeta- tion and is capable of storing water, this area does not confine a volume of 1/4 acre foot of water (10.57 (2) (b) ) and is therefore not an Isolated Land Subject to Flooding resource area. Two additional areas of limited wetlands vegetation were found onsite. One is located adjacent to the railway track bed at the center of the northern property line (see Plan, area II) . A second was located in the eastern end of the property (see Plan, area III) . These areas are isolated from the North River, they do not store water and do not support a community of wet- lands plants in excess of 50� cover. c� � - � � � J � � � ee�vacc FlBERKRAFT,INC..BEDPORD.NN800-258-1063 A91t ATTACHMENT G HABITAT EVALIIATION The site provides a range of conditions, including a steep wooded slope in the south easterly portion of the property which supports a mixed deciduous community of oak and maple. The balance of the property is urbanized and industrial land support- ing a shrub layer of weeds and grasses. Due to the urban/industrial nature of the site, it is ex- pected that the area would support a limited variety of fauna. These would include: rat, mouse, raccoon and opossum. Avian species observed onsite are robin, pigeon, crow, sparrow and seagulls. As required under the section on Wildlife Habitat Evaluation (10. 60) , this project will not alter wildlife habitat in excess of the thresholds permitted under 310 CMR 10.54 (4) (a) (5) , 10.56 (4) (a) (4) , and 10.57 (4) (a) (3) , respectively. Due to the urban- ized and extensively altered floodplain and channelized nature of the North River within the locus of the project, the proposed construction will not adversely effect food, shelter or migrating and breeding areas for wildlife(10. 57 (1) (a) ) . Also, there will be no impacts or overwintering areas for mammals or reptiles. On June 16, 1993, the site was reconnoitered for the possi- ble presence of rate and endangered species as listed by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species program. No evidence of listed species or vernal pool habitat were noted during the field inspection. In addition, the Atlas Estimated Habitats of State-Listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife was consulted for the possible occurrence of estimated habitat within the vicinity of the project. No such area was shown within a five mile radius of the project. x � � � � H � � � � e.:rner� FIBERKRAFT,INC.,BEDFORD,NH900-259-1063 R911 ATTACHMENT H MITIGATION MEASIIRES The following mitigating measures will be utilized to meet the performance standards of the Wetland Regulations and to maintain the significant functions of resource areas on and adjacent to the site. 1. A single, continuous row of staked haybales backed by a siltation fence shall be installed along the length of the project parallel with the North River, as indicated on the Plan. This line of haybales and silt fence is proposed in order to provide an erosion and sedimentation control barrier as recom- mended in "Erosion & Sedimentation Control guidelines, DEQE, 1983 . " Haybales furnished shall be twice looped with wire or other cordage resistant to rot. Haybales shall be set in an excavated trench 6" deep, oriented with the wire loops parallel to the surface contour, tightly butted to adjacent bales, and staked with two 2"x2"x3 ' stakes or sections of 'rebar� spaced equally in the bale and driven solidly into the underlying mate- rial. No spoil from the excavation of the trench shall be placed or stockpiled on the resource area side of the barrier. NOTE: Additional haybaling required by the Commission during the project duration shall also be provided and installed in accord- ance with the previous paragraph. 2 . Areas of exposed soils, other than gravel base course, which are exposed for more than 2 weeks will be mulched with hay in order to control erosion on site. 3 . All newly constructed catch basins will have sumps to collect debris within the structured drainage system. All new catch basins servicing paved areas will be provided with gas and oil separator hoods. stopshop.rep Y � a3,�.�3d ��sa3 o�m z�z� a�.,«�s,.�3,3...s». � • • . Q � 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENV(RONMENTAL PAOTEC710N �I �� I� �CJ � 10.99: continued � , .�� .- ,•. .-., � � QI.. ;�'i:" —Q r.�c.� 9� (.,'J AEa:, _ : � ; .;• . _ �� ;� D'[P ISk Na - - �� • .• . �QUG j � iL , 55-369 � rora s �e � Cio ne p�w:aee q nEr) �mtl�.""� ',j:-r;a;;;,._ ,-�,__, c�y�ro„� Peabody ;,;;:;�. � �;�„ Stop & Shop Co�onveelth - of Xasaaehusett+ � � � Order of ConAitions � Hassachuetts Aetlands Protection Act .G.L. c. 131, §�0 � . Fr� Peabody Conservation Commission I��uinq Authority , Ta ELizabeth Ftank/ Stop & Shop See Attachment A " � � . � (Nema of Applieant) � (Name of property ownez) - P.O. Box 1492 Boston " MldCo�• Addreas - MA �21�5 � This Order is ia�ued aad delivered aa follwa: � by hand�deliwry to �ppliunt or repre�entative on $� 09 /94 �date) - , ❑ by eertified mail, return receipt requested on � (date) ' ' - rhis projaet i• lxated at 19 Howley St. Peabody & Salem T The property..is zeeorded at the Registry of See AttdChment A eook Page ! - certifieaie (if registered) � The Notiee oi Inteat for tLia projeet vaa filed on S/3/94 . (date) "� The-�ublie Learing vaa elosed on 8/20/94 �date� • Findings . . � � 7�.. COIRD11SS10R Ma�rev{e.rM [he �beve-tefeimced Matice of Intmt W plus W Ns - held � pb�,{c he�riry m the project. ��sM on ihe inionutim�w(t�ble to tht Commi ssi_on �t thic ' � tlue� the ��1SS10II Ms�detc�nined t�et the are� m uhicA tAe prepesed wrk i: so be tlone 1• ' ' - siyniHc�ns se tAe foUovinp interess� In�ccorEarce wi[h tM irt:mptimc o/ f(pnificu+ce c<t forth to the � � flpYI�LIWY }Of N[h Mb SlbjlCS 20 Vt0[Ktidl lkdlf Sh< �Ct (CAKk �f iFQlOprl�t!)C ' P�LI{e v�ttr �upp1Y ilood Cmvol Und tmt�inirq shellfish .. � iriwte wvet npplY � Stor�tlm9e prevmtim � iisherie� Grourq w�er uyp1Y 0� irevencim ef pollaHm Protmoim ef YilElife xibitrt / Teo.t rn�ro r« sw.cc�w $525.00 suu sn.�. $250.00 .. ' . (1/2 fee in eacess o1 s25) � [iry/ioun 5��re w275.�� ' Toul �efvd Due i [ILY/iwn ioRfm f Sbie VortipS (1/2 tot�U (1/2 aot�U ` 11/20/92 330 CMR - 280:39 , � ' � 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION . 10.99: continued � xhar.foie, th� Commission hazeby Sind• theC the folloving condition• are nece�sary, in aeeordenca vith the performnnce stnndards •4t forth in tha ragul�tion�, to pzotact tho�a interests ehacked above. -ihe l:ommission ordar� that �11 vork �hall be parfosawd Sn �ccordanca vith sald eonditions and , vith the Not1c� of Intent rpferenced above. To the extent that tha folloving • condition� nodity oz differ Srom the plans, epecifications or other propo�al• � submittad vith tha Notica of Intaat, tha conditiona shall control. � Cener�l Coaditions � � 1. Fniluz� to eamply vitd ail eondition� �tated 6erein, and vith ell relat�d . - �latut�s and otLar ragulatory nas�ures, andll be deemed cauu to revoka or aadifp thi� order. � . . � . ' 2. 2hs Ozder doe• not grant any property zighte or any excluaive pzivilege�; it dx� aot authorise my Snjury to private property or invaaion of � � � � privete righU. - � 3. This order does aot reli�v� the pezmittQe or any other person of tha . neca�sity of eomplying vitb all other applieable teder�l, stata or lxal atatutes, ordinancea,� by-levs or regulationa. - � - � 4. Tha wrk authorized Aezeunder ahall be eompleted vithin three yenre from � �. � � the data ot this order nnless either oL the tollwing applys • . (a) ths vork is a mainteaanee dredging projeet aa provided for in tha � � . - act; or (b) the time for eompletion bae beea extended to a specified date moze � than tLres yaars, but less tban five yaars, from Lhe date oi iaevanee aad both that data aad the speeiel eircumstances varrantiag tAe � , exteaded time period ara set iortb in thia ozder. . 5. This order may b� exteaded by tha is�uiag authority for one or more period� 01 np to three yaazs eseh npon� application to the issving . � ,�uthority at laast 30 dayi prior to-lhe expiration date of tha order. � 6. any 2ill�v�ad in conaectioa vith thi� projact �hall be cleaa fill; - eontaiaiag no traa6, rafusa, rubbish or debrie, including but not limited� . � ' - to lumber, brieks, plaster, vira, lath, paper, eardboard, pipe, tires, . � a�bes, refrignrator�, motor vehieles or parts of any of the Soregoing. - . 7. No vork shall be undertaken untll nll adminictrative appeal periods from . this order have elapaed or, �if such an nppeal has been filed, until ell � proceediagc before the Departmeat have been eompleted. 8. No work �hall be undertaken vntil the Final order has been recorded . . in the Regi�try of Deeds or the Land Court Sor the dictrict in vhich the lend is lxated, vithin the ehain of title of the affected � - property. in the case oi recozded land, the Final order shall alco . be noted Sn the Registry•s Grantor Index under the nnme of the ovner - � of the land upon vhich the proposed vork i• to be�done. In tha eane of registered land, the Final ozder ahall also be noted on the Lend court cerpiEicate of Titla of the ovner of the land upon vhieh the ' proposed wrk ia to be doge. The reeording Snforsatin ehall ba submitted to theCommlssion on the Sorm at the end of this Order � prior to coam�eneement of ths vork. � 9. a dgn �hall be di�played at the site not leu than tvo aquare feet or mora ihan tbree aquare�feet in sise benring the vords, 'Hassachu�etts Dep nitment of Envi[onmental Prote�tion, t'i1e Number 55-569 10. whera the Department of Environmantal Proteciion Sa requeated to meka • determination and to iseue a Supereeding order, the Conservation Couoniasion ehnll be a party to all agency pzoceedings and heeringe before the Department. 11/20/92 � 330 CMR - 280.40 . 370 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMEN"fAL PROT£CTION 10.99: conlinued � 11. Upon comple[Son of the vork desczibed herein, the applieant ahell forthvith zequa�t in vriting that a Ceriificate of Complienca be iseued ■tating that the vork ha• been •ati�fectorily complated. 12. She wrk �hall eonform to the folloving pinns and specisl conditione: . � rlana: Plans for Proposed Supermarket - Stop & Shop (See Below) < Title Dated Signed nnd Stamped by: on File with: "6��J 5/3/94 Christopher Mello, PLS PCC S � Sheet A of 7, B of 7, C of 7, D of 7, E of 7, F of 7, G of 7. . �15 � �� n�� . S Plans of Proposed Supermarket: Dated 6/15/93• Revisions 4/20/94 ��1` �� jU � I Speeial Coaditions (Us� additionsl paper if neeessary) / ��✓ Standard Conditions 1-12. �.s �-�✓`' � Special Conditions 13-50: Attached and Incorporated Herein. � r�� "� � .F �1t c �e't'��r.( , ��°�, (Leave 5pnce Blank) , .............................................................................. - 11/20/92 � 310 CMR - 280.41 EXHIBIT A Owner: Advantage Bank Telephone No. (617)846-9200 Address: 25 Bartlett Road Winthrop, MA Title Reference: Owner: John J. Jeffers Telephone No. (508)531-1221 Address: 164 Boston Street Salem, MA Title Reference: Ocmer: Margaret M. Buckley Telephone No. ' Address: 1212 Ocean Blvd. Rye, NH Title Reference: Book 6671 Page 114 I Da�4oc,� �►�ad �oQ�ca� ��ootlo0� IIo�o ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT : Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley St. , Peabody/Salem 13 . If any permit, license or approval by any other municipal agency, board or commission is withdrawn, obtained or reversed and the construction work is to be altered or changed from the plan filed with the Commission and made a part of this Order of Conditions , the applicant shall notify the Commission in writing addressed to the Chairman through the Commission ' s Office prior to any work commencing on the project. If the Commission determines that the changes or alterations are to be significant, the Commission may require a new Notice of Intent or a modification of the existing Order of Conditions. 14 . A copy of this Order of Conditions shall be included in all construction contracts and subcontracts dealing with the work proposed and shall supercede other contract requirements . 15 . This order shall apply to all successors in interest, in possession or in control and shall be attached to the Deed and Title .for this property. 16 . A copy of this Order shall be present on the site at all , , times until the completion and certification of compliances by the Commission. 17 . The applicant shall file with the Commission prior to any request for -a Certificate of Compliance , a Certified Copy of the Order of Conditions as recorded with the South Essex Registry of Deeds , which must include the appropriate Book and Page reference . •� 18. The staked hay bales shall be placed prior to any construction on-site ; the applicant shall notify, in writinq , the Commission, through the Chair, with the same filed with the Commission ' s Office . Said hay bales shall be maintained until a Certificate of Compliance is issued. ��9 . The applicant shall obtain from the Commission a partial or final Certificate of Compliance before the applicant applies for an Occupancy Permit. 5-3B � ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT : Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley St. , Peabody/Salem 20. The applicant and owner by conducting work under this Order of Conditions hereby grants and consents to the Commission and its agents the right to enter upon the premises subject to the Order of Conditions at any time to inspect compliance with the Order or for any other purpose directed by the Commission or its Chairman. This right shall continue until a Final Certificate of Compliance has been issued on the premises . � 21 . When the applicant applies to the Building Inspector' s Office for a permit for construction of a foundation, the S> applicant must show on the plot plan for proposed � 1�� foundation, the location of haybales on site . A copy of �y / this plan must be submitted by the applicant to the �</\� Conservation Commission at the time of application for �� the Foundation Permit. 22 . In conjunction with the sale of any lot governed by this I '= Order, the applicant shall submit to the Conservation Commission a signed statement by the buyer that he/she is , , aware of an outstanding Order of Conditions on the development and has received a copy of this Order of ' Conditions. 23. No earthen embankment in the Buffer Zone shall have a slope steeper than 2 : 1 . 24. In order to receive a Certificate of Compliance upon completion of the project, the applicant must send to the Commission a letter requesting an appointment to be placed on the agenda for a Certificate of Compliance along with ( 11 ) eight copies of the "As-Built" plan of the project and a locus map of the area. 25 . The Conservation Commission shall be notified in writing ( 48 ) forty-eight hours prior to work start-up that staked-haybales and silt fence are in place and ready for inspection. 5-3C ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT : Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley St. , Peabody/Salem 26 . The 21E report shall be filed with the Conservation Commission office prior to the start of any work. � 27 . Any changes to the plans resulting from other Local , State or Federal approvals must be submitted to the Conservation Commission. 28 . All on-site facilities will be maintained by Stop & Shop or any successor in title . Catchbasins will be inspected every three months and cleaned and cleared as needed, but in no case less often than yearly. ,,- y�"' A'�`�fS�G S 5 29 . Oil will be removed from catchbasins and grease from the grease trap by personnel duly licensed to do such work. 30. Revised plans showing grassed swales versus concrete swales shall be submitted to the Commission. 3} .. A landscape plan for the area north of the building will be approved by the Community Development Department and . implemented as such by the applicant. 32 . No demolition materials or construction debris shall be deposited or disposed of in the Buffer Zone or wetlands or the Flood Plain. Hazardous material.s from the demolition and construction activity shall be disposed of ' at approved disposal sites : 33 . No liquid or floatable demolition materials and construction materials and debris shall be stored at the site below elevation 12 (NGVD ) for more than five ( 5 ) days or during expected flooding , without written approval of the Conservation Commission. 5-3D ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT: Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley Street , Peabody/Salem / 34 . No chemicals , electrical equipment, machinery, trash, floatable items shall be .located or stor_ed below- elevatio -2—(_NG-V_D_) without p.r-o.p.e-r—f.loo.d—p-r.o.ofin.g—and__ a�proval of the Conservation Commission. Flood proof areas can not be used to meet the flood storage requirements . 35 . No tanks or other containers shall be located on the site on in the proposed building if they contain flammable fluids or other chemicals without prior approval by the Conservation Commission. 36 . The contractor will be required to have control over access to the site by unauthorized vehicles by installation and maintenance fences , gates , etc . as may be necessary. V 37 . Prior to any construction, all necessary State and/or == Federal Permits and all orders of conditions from Salem Conservation Commission shall be submitted to the Peabody , . Conservation Commission. 38. , 39 . and 40, are CONDITIONS IN PERPETUITY f38. The applicant, owner, successor, or assignee ( s ) shall be responsible for maintaining all on-site drainage structures and outfalls , assuring the lasting integrity �, of vegetative cover on the site and site activities so as L/ to prevent erosion, siltation, sedimentation, chemical U� � contamination or other detrimental impact to the adjacent \�I off-site wetlands resource area. , � 5-3E ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT: Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley Street, Peabody/Salem 39 . All effluent catch basins shall contain oil/gasoline traps and it shall be a continuing condition of this order even after a Certificate of Compliance has been issued that the oil/gasoline traps in the catch basins he maintained every six months and a record kept subject to inspection by the Peabody Conservation Commission. 40 . On this lot no Underground storage of fuel oils shall be allowed on any lot within this development. This condition shall survive this Order of Conditions and shall run with the Title of the Property. 5-3F ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT : Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley Street, Peabody/Salem I EARTH MOVING-STOCKPILING-EROSION\SEDIMENTATION CONTROL �� 41 . The drainage system, ( replication area and compensatory storage areas if applicable ) , shall be constructed during the initial phase of the project so that they may be functional during construction. Said structures shall be kept free of silt and debris to ensure their proper operation. All drains shall be maintained until construction is completed. 42 . Any siltation caused onto any wetland or waterway areas shall be reported promptly to the CC and such areas shall be restored to the satisfaction of the CC . 43. Temporary seeding, mulching or other suitable stabilization measures shall be used to protect exposed areas during prolonged construction or other disturbance . 44. '/All final earth grading shall be permanently stabilized by the application of loam and seed or sod. 5-3G r I ORDER OF CONDITIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLICANT : Eliza6eth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley Street, Peabody/Salem ADlfINISTRATIVE CHECK LIST LARGE COMMERCIAL PROJECTS 45 . Prior to construction, the applicant shall inform the Conservation Commission in writing of the name ( s ) , address ( es ) , and business and home phone numbers of the project supervisor( s ) who will be responsible for insuring performance of all sedimentation and erosion control measures , wetland alteration and replication aspects of the project. 46 . In advance of any work on this project, the applicant shall notify the Conservation Commissi� and at the request of the Conservation Commission� shall arrange an on-site conference among the Conservation`�ommission, the contractor, the engineer, and the applicant to ensure ==that all the Conditions of this Order are understood� This Order also shall be made a part of the contractor' s , , written contract. �47 . Commencing with the issuance of this Order and continuing , through the existence of same the applicant shall su6mit to the Conservation Commission a written progress report every three ( 3 ) months detailing what work has been done in or near resource areas . •� DEWATERING 48. Any dewatering activities on the project site in which water will be released to Resource Areas shall make use of a settling pond or similar device to remove sediment before water is released . 5-3H r ORDER OF CONDZTIONS CITY OF PEABODY DEP 55-369 APPLZCANT: Elizabeth Frank for Stop & Shop ADDRESS : 19 Howley Street, Peabody/Salem 49 . Upon completion of construction and grading, all disturbed areas located outside resource areas shall be stabilized permanently against erosion. This shall be done either by sodding or by loaming , seeding and mulching according to Soil Conservation Service standards . If the latter course is chosen, stabilization will be considered once the surface shows complete vegetative cover has been achieved. CHECK LIST ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS V50. Lower sodium de-icing chemicals shall be used on all paved surfaces . 5-3I ��i r ' 10.99: conlinued - __ - . .,� , . �_�i- . ._ ... . . QI:_ 1.,��:. � 11'i ., i� G Ieeued Hy Peabo cons rvntio comni„csion� �� Signeture( ) �" �L� �t - � ' 2hi� er mu�t ba ■igned by a mjority of the concervation commission. . On thie ZOth day of July 19 94 , before me � persoaally appeared aboVe-named signatories , io me knovn to ba the peraon deseribed in and vho exeeuted the foregoing instrunent and aeknwladged � that he/shn executed tbe •a�e as his/hes' free act ana aeea. MARILYN J.IIMONGIELLO � • NOTARY PUBLIC W mmmicei��eyp,Feb.3.2000 � Nota u Hy couu�ission expiies - -- � � _ ihe applSunt. the w�er. rry persm�Nrieved bY tAts Order, u�y wxr oi Iwd �buttinp Ne l�rd upm yhSch tne proposed �wrt Is to De done. x MP ten rosident� of eAe eStY a to�+� in yh{M s�cA lwd (s louted, �n hereb/rotified of their r(pht te requeat the Oepartwent of Emiro�vienul Vroteetim to iewe � fupereediN Ofde�. prwiditp tAe �cyuest is rde hy eertffitd ril w hud delivery to the Departeene, rlth tAe �pprapri�te filteg fee ad fee irrwi[ul (or+�s prwided in 310 Gat 10.03(7). ri�nin tm Wya tros the Gte of issuarce of tnit detmf�u[Son. A eopy et t�e requesc sAall +� t�e we ciwe be smt W eertffied �u{L or.6ard delfvery io tM1e Caxerntfon Coewisefan�rd [Ae �PPlfcw+t. � Det.ch a+dotted ltro wd si6uit to Me COWR15S10R pr{er eo emnerceaent of wrk. """......""..................................................................""'...""........_..... t, Peabodv Conservar;on r�mm;��;.. ics�c� �u:nor;�r ale�se Ee sevised tMt tAe orEer et [aditlau for tne prolKc �t Howlev St. ' ifle Murber 55-369 ��s been �teerd�d �c the �epietry-o1 � hes bem roceC in tne Natn of eitle o1 t�e dfecud propertY {n se<ordarce vith Gmenl [ondiHon 6 m , • ,19 H recoroeC l�M, the Inctrwene �aa6er �htcA identilles this tr�ncac[im it � . H te9ie[ered lW. cM docu�eM �6er`Aith 1hnNfl<s t�ie tn'x�ctim Ie sivruturc MPUc�nt 11/20/92 � 310 CMR - 280.A3 . ; PEABODY CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18 , 1994 PEABODY CITY HALL - LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT : MEMBERS ABSENT : Joseph Horrigan , Chairman Andrew Cotreau, Vice-Chairman John Marino, Secretary Joseph Bogigian Arthur Peretzian Susan St. Pierre Arthur Pavlo Frances Gallugi , Alternate James Demotses , Alternate Curt eellavance , Planner CHAIRMAN HORRIGAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 7 : 00 P . M. •ww ,� aa � 1 . Approval of Minutes for April 20 , 1994 . MS . ST . PIERRE : Motion to accept the minutes . MR. BOGIGIAN : I second the motion . MR. HORRIGAN: Discussion on the motion. No. All those in favor say, 7 ayes . Any opposed, No . Motion carries . . . . .. ., « Page 2 2 . Public Hearing for a NOI for Joel and Elizabeth Brenner, 210 Washington St. , for the property known as Lot 3 , Alexandra St. , Summit Acres . Proposed work is for the construction of a single famil dwelling , appurtenant utilities and landscape within the Y buffer to a resource area. Christopher Mello , Eastern Land Survey MR. MELLO : 2 am here with the Brenner' s who are here to my right this evening. We are here pursuant to a NOI for Lot 3 . It was the subject of a previous Order of Conditions for Summit Acres that held a condition that Lot 3, and several other lots shall be refiled with a separate filing depicting the proposed dwelling and other appurtenant structures and work to be done in the buffer. Lot 3 as you see before you ( showed planl proposed dwelling with the deck also shown are proposed shed and garage all within the buffer. The remaining land outside of the haybales in the buffer will be loom and seeded for a yard and a driveway will be constructed from Alexander St. Again, all this work is in the alexandra, none of it is in the resource area and this is what was anticipated from the definitive subdivision. I 'd be happy to answer any questions the Commission may have . MR. MARINO : Through you Mr. Chairman, I was at the site , I think were the proposed dwelling is , there is a sort of a part of a foundation, that wasn' t shown on the plan, that ' s lying there right now, so there going to have to dig that up. MR. MELLO : Whatever there , will have to go. MR. MARTNO : Right, I understand that but generally when you do a print, if there was an old building there , you would show the old building . MR. MELLO : There wasn' t an old building , there might be something there that was covered up , but in our initial survey, we didn ' t uncover that. This plan is an enlarged reproduction of the original survey. MR . MARINO : Right, Okay, just for the record, there is something old there . Now the proposed garage doesn ' t show the actual driveway yet. � - , Page 3 , MR. MELLO : Right, there is a driveway that is proposed from Alexander St. The garage may not be built, initially, due to the way the Brenner' s are going to attack this . We may end up with a driveway that wouldn ' t serve the garage immediately, but 2 ' d like them to have the opportunity, hopefully considering in your Order of Conditions , they could build a driveway in the buffer and it wouldn ' t be tied down, so that they don ' t have to come back again if it has to be slightly moved or if in the process they decide that it will go to the garage . MR. MARINO : Right, I had called the Building Inspector, because I did see the drainaqe easement, really is very close to the proposed garage . MR. MELLO: Yes , but it is out of it. MR. MARINO: Right, but if they ever had to go in there , to work on it, it would be sort of a problem, wouldn ' t it? MR. MELLO : That drainage access easement is from Lynn St. It has nothing to do with coming in from Alexander. Nobody has any rights to come into that. MR. MARINO : Then Ralph would have no problem with it. MR. MELLO : I don ' t think it is his jurisdiction. MR. MARINO: That ' s why I called, I had really called him, I didn ' t know the City regulations with the 5 foot, when it is detached you can have 5 feet, attached 20 feet, Ralph would have no problem with that. MR. t4ELL0 : As long as it is out of the easement , that' s what the easement is there for. MR. MARINO: And the dwelling itself , the proposed garage is 30 feet from the actual floor water and your conservancy district. Now my problem is and I know your wrote here 68 . 2 elevation for your conservancy district, but you are showing a shed 10 ' x 20 ' . I could see you down sizing the shed to a 10 x 10, because if you scale that, that ' s 20 feet to a conservancy and we ' re calling for a 30 foot. �_ Page 4 MR. MELLO : I suggest that the swale isn ' t part of the conservancy district, if you look at your map, that ' s not shaded and that ' s not a water way listed. That ' s a drainage channel . MR. MARINO: It ' s running, it' s free flowing water, it was running the day I was there . MR . PERETZIAN : It was running the day I was there . NR. MELLO : Z agree its running , I agree its free flowing, I just disagree that it has any jurisdiction from the Conservancy District as it is not listed in your table , and it is not shaded on the map. I 'm not trying to be difficult, I just don' t agree with you . MS . ST . PIERRE : Where is the Conservancy district line? MR. MELLO: The Conservancy District line is along Goldthwaithe Brook, which I have a copy of the plan anticipating that you might have a discussion in this manner. I think you will find that the Conservancy District by the map ends down here ( showed on plan ) then there is a listed a group . . . MS . ST. PIERRE : What' s the lot we are looking at? MR. MELLO : Up here , we are about 200 feet from Goldthwaite . MR . MARINO: When you shot over here , you got this that' s 66 , 68 riqht over here , plus there ' s monitoring wells over here , these weren ' t even shown, there ' s 5 wells . MR . MELLO : They are not monitoring wells, they' re water wells and they belong to Eastman Gelatine and they are off the site . MR. MARINO : Right, but Eastman Gelatine is always very. you know, they are very curious as to what' s happening to their land that abuts them. We had a problem with Cedar Pond Villaqe , that they' re building now, and that abuts them and they want to know what ' s happening. MR . MELLO: Well , they were given certified notice of this meeting. i Page 5 MR. MARINO : Now, I know that Eastman Gelatine owns that land . I not happy with the shed being a 20 x 10 , I 'm happy with 10 x 10. MR . PERETZIAN: I would like to get a ruling , are we or are we not? MR. MELLO : We have the map out. MR . PERETZIAN: Send the City Engineer out and get us a ruling. MS . ST . PIERRE : What are the resources areas here? MR. MELLO : The resources areas are flagged ( Showed flags ) MR. HORRIGAN: Can you show us the Conservancy District on the map? MR. MELLO: The district is right here . MR. PERETZIAN: You believe . MR. MELLO : No , I know. MR. HORRIGAN: Right. Where is it on the plan? MR. MELLO: It is running right through here ( Showed on plan ) running parallel with Goldthwaithe Brook. It does not come down to Lynnfield St. Which this brook does . MR . l4ARIN0 : My pro6lem, is 68 point and we have 68 here , we have FEMA maps that aren' t correct either. MR . MELLO : John, it is a zoning issue . Zt is as clear, it is clear, there ' s the map that shows you were it is and then there is a table of brooks that it covers, it doesn ' t say anything about a drainage channel coming from Lynnfield St. and it doesn' t show it on the map . DISCUSSION ENSUED . MR. MELLO : Hy only comment, is that it is not subject to the Zoning Act in the Conservancy District. Maybe we can cut to the chase here , I don ' t think. . , the Brenner' s want to get goinq on there house , the shed was more , let ' s get one now. Do you care if it is a 10x10 or 10x20? Page 6 MR. BRENNER: No . MS . ST . PIERRE : I don ' t even think we ' re at that point yet. MR . MELLO : Well I don ' t want that to become an issue of i them not being able to build this year. MR . HORRIGAN : Okay, do you want to take the shed off of here for now? MS . ST . PIERRE : Before we do that, can we discuss what resource areas this shed is next to? I think there is BVW here but it is not shown clearly , on this plan. A shed 5 feet away from BVW to me is a little different then a shed being 20 feet away from a drainage swale . What other lots are coming in, in the future on this? MR . MELLO : Lots 4 and 5 . MS . ST . PIERRE : Okay, can you clearly label BVW. MR. MELLO : Sure . DISCUSSZON. , MS . ST . PIERRE : I would just as soon have no shed and have the garaqe and I think you could move the garage closer to the road and put a shed further away from the resource area. MR. MELLO : We can ' t move the garage because of zoning . DISCllSSED ZONING AND PLACEMENT OF SHED. TAKE SHED OFF . WE" WILL NOTE IT ON OUR COPY. IT WILL BE IN THE ORDER OF CONDITIONS. MR. HORRIGAN : Is there anyone wishing to speak on Item 2 . No. What is the wish of the Commission? MS . ST . PIERRE : Motion to issue an Order of Conditions approving the construction of a single family dwelling and garage on Lot 3 Alexandra St. , with the condition that the proposed shed_be removed from the site plan and they will come w ' a later , back if they ish to have a shed at ' ons 1- date , with the standard Order of Conditi ' 25 . Page 7 MR . MELLO : In the original order we had an item, that prohibited any work within so many feet of the haybales to keep them from getting close to it. We need that eliminated or just make it clear that this Order supercedes the other one . DISCUSSION ENSUED - This Order supercedes the condition governing the Order which approved the Subdivision - Summit Acres - which prohibits construction activity. DEP 55-350 . Condition #30. MR. BOGIGIAN : I second the motion. MR. HORRIGAN : I have a motion to close the hearing and issue an Order of Conditions , 1-13 and 14-26 and to eliminate condition #30 on this site only for DEP 55-350 . Any further discussion on this motion. All in favor say aye , 7 ayes. Any opposed. No . Motion carries . . . . ... . . . Page 8 ' MR. HORRIGAN : Z reali2e there a number or people who Would like to tape this meeting , if you would state your name and who is taping? Attorney William DiMento , Swampscott. ATTY. DIMENTO : I object to the request under Chapter 39 , Section 23h, of the P1GL. This is a public meeting , under the open meetinq law, MR. HORRIGAN: That ' s right. ATTY. DIMENTO : There ' s no obligation for any person to reveal for what reason or who it is for or who is taping. MR. HORRIGAN : We didn' t ask for who they are taping . ATTY. DIMENTO : To satisfy your curiosity and not to comply with the request, it is attorney William R. Dimento , 990 Paradise Road , Swampscott . MR. PERETZIAN: And you are? ATTY. DIMENTO ; I am an attorney. My name is Gregor MacGregor of the Law Firm. MacGregor and Shay. I ' ll be here speaking later toniqht and I ' m taping the meeting as well . MR. HORRIGAN: The whole meeting? MR. PERETZIAN: That ' s all he wanted to known. ATTY . MACGREGOR: The portion that deals with the Stop & Shop application. Thank you. MR. HORRIGAN: Put it up there any place , You ' re going to keep it in your hand or? ATTY. DIMENTO : Yes , I ' m afraid the heiqht will . . . MR. HORRIGAN ; Okay, stand back out of the way. Is there anybody else? II. Page 9 MR . PERETZIAN : Barrister, are you aoing to tape? ATTY. KEILTY: I am not. MR. HORRIGAN : 3 . Public Hearing for a NOI for Stop & Shop Supermarket Co . , Inc . P . O . Box 1942 , Boston . Proposed work is for the development oi a Supermarket facility. Proposed work entails working with the buffer zone including construction of a stormwater detention basin, grading , paving, etc . for the property known as Howley St. , Map 86 , Lots 130, 131 , 132 , 133 & 134 , in Peabody and Salem. MR. HORRIGAN: One more thing , we are not qoing to talk about traffic , we ' re only going to talk about the issues that we as a Conservation Commission can discuss , we have a lot of people , I believe that want to talk on this and the issues that we will discuss are the Wetlands ACT items and flooding and Lhe Conservation Conservancy district, zoning in the City of Peabody. Do you want to continue . Attorney John R. Keilty, 40 Lowell St. Christopher R . Mello, Eastern Land Survey Paul Sommer, Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. James McDowell , Eastern Land Survey ATTY. KEILTY: I am representing Stop & Shop Companies with respect to an application that they have presented to the City of Peabody Conservation Commission for the development of a site located in Peabody and Sal�m, Massachusetts . With me this evening are representatives of Eastern Land Survey, both Jim McDowell and Christopher Mello and additionally Paul Sommer from Sommer Environmental Technologies . We would like to break up the presentation into several aspects and they will be presented to you in an overview presentation by myself and then Mr. Sommer �aill address standards of performance and resources areas and then hydraulic issues and flood plain issnes will be presented to you by Mr. McDowell of Eastern Land Survey. This proposal is for the development of a Stop & Shop Supermarket facility. We have filed an application for variance here with the City of Peabody and it has been granted , however that is the subject of some litigation in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts . Page 10 ATTY. KEILTY: Additionally, we have filed in Salem for a planned PUD application. And we will additionally be filing also with Salem with the Conservation Commission. We have reflected these applications and the status of those applications in our NOI. The proposal that we will present to you this evening calls for the development of a parking lot and supermarket facility and what we have chosen to do is present to the Board that box, if you will , that supermarket facility, I ' ll use the graphics that we have rather than this . ATTY. DIMENTO : Mr. Chairman, could I interrupt for a moment? MR. HORRIGAN: Sure . ATTY. DIMENTO : On a jurisdictional matter, could I examine the affidavit that' s on file relative to the notice provided pursuant to the statute . ATTY. KEILTY: That would be return of service , We used a constable in this instance to serve notice upon the ahutters to the property. MR. HORRIGAN: Why don ' t we go on. CLERK : We don' t have anything here . ATTY. DIMENTO : I raise that issue before we waste the Boards ' time in hearing the hearing if , where its ' jurisdictional as you know, since April 8 , for a hearing to proceed under Chapter 31 , 131 Section 40 ( 2 ) that a certificate of , an affidavit by the petitioner must be on file prior to the hearing. And if there is none on - file , than the Board doesn' t have jurisdiction and I suggest that it would be a error of time or a waste of time to convene a hearing if it is not jurisdictionally proper to do so . So I just ask, just so you don' t waste an hour or two hours in a hearing that would have to he repeated anyway. The purpose of that is that I represent several people in the neighborhood that 2 don ' t know whether they were notified and if they were , there ' s only one way for me to determine if they have been jurisdictionally protected, in by examining the affidavit required by the statute . I have a copy of the statute if you ' d like to see it Page 11 MR. HORRIGAN: No , I ' m not going to go through the statute now. I guess what you ' re telling me is that you would like to examine those at some time . Don ' t you have the right to examine them later and then appeal . ATTY. DIMENTO: No . I do , but it would be a waste of this Board ' s time to have a hearing if there is no jurisdiction of the Board to have it without that affidavit on file and it would seem to me in the interest of time , we know we are going to have a hearing and if you do have a hearing it should be pursuant to the statue . MR . HORRIGAN: Let me ask you councillor? ATTY. KEILTY: I have the return of service from the constable who served the abutters . I could interrupt the proceedings at this time and go over to my office and get it or, in the alternative . . . HR. HORRIGAN: No , let me ask further, that the abutters you have are the right abutters? ATTY . XEILTY: Yes . MR. HORRIGAN: Okay, we ' ll go on. ATTY. DIMENTO : Thank you. MR . MARINO: And another thing, through you Mr. Chairman, on filing a NOI , the next time this happens on a new such a large scale of abutters , if you could put on your NOI all the abutters names on the NOi , also. So we can match them up on the NOI with the . . . ATTY. KEILTY: I think i was at the point where 2 was suggesting to the Board, that what is being considered this evening . MR . HORRIGAN: Okay, let ' s , maybe we can turn this right against the wall so that as many people as possible can look at it, Atty. DiMento , maybe you could move down here and they could put that right against the wall . Page 1� ATTY . KEILTY : Just for orientation ( pointed too on map ) . This is Howley St. , in Peabody, MA. The line between Peabody and Salem is right here . This is the City line between the property which traverses , actually hisects the front portion of the huilding this area is to be utili2ed for parking . It will be an access to the property and egress at this point on Howley St. There will be an additional access and egress to the property at that point on Howley St. This will be the rear of the premises. There is an area that Mr. McDowell will discuss with you later this evening . In this general area of the property which is a water management facility. This is the Brennan property which is referred to in the NOI , I 'm sorry the former Brennan property is riqht here . This area is owned by John Jeffers and then the remaining parcel of land , with an exception, this dotted line represents an area that is owned by John Jeffers . What I ' d like to speak to at this point, is that we are showing to the Board, a building, which is a , building that the Stop & Shop hopes to develop for this site . In event that the variance is eventually, is capable of being utilized, this is the building that will be developed. In the event that the PIID, is eventually adopted in Salem, that is the building. There is one possible scenario , in which the building would change . That would be an intrusion we would need to remove without benefit of a zone change and without benefit of a variance . We would need to have a setback of some 40 feet rather than 10 feet of side line . And there would be area of the building, let ' s for the sake of this evenings discussion, suggest that it was this entire area. Now, the issues as presented to the Conservation Commission will � remain the same with respect to surface water runoff , impervious site , impact upon the wetland, so that my suggestion to the Board, if there is in fact a change at a later date with respect to the size of the facility, that the issues as presented to this Board, do not change . This is the channel which is known as the North River ( Showed on plan) this is the existing railroad track and our property is , as the Board can see on the other side of the railroad track from an area known as the North River. Page 13 ATTY. KEILTY: I ' d like to also point out by way of orientation, this is the City of Peabody Old South Burial Ground, i think that I ' d like now to turn over the presentation to Paul Sommer, of Sommer Environmental Technologies . Thank you. Paul Sommer, Sommer Environmental Technologies , Inc . Wakefield , MA MR . SOASMER: Having received, having heard this introduction to the site , I would like to digress a little bit probably more for the benefit of the abutters than the Commission itself , but I think it is valuable to present to this hearing what we ' re doing here , why we ' re here and each of the resource areas we ' re dealing with. We have an overview, essentially of the site , what I have done is but toqether, a handout, that represents each of the sets of performance standards which we deal with under the Wetlands Protection Act. ACT - gave out handouts to the Commission , these are certainly available if you ' d like to pass those around. I ' d like to go first through the performance standards what they mean and then I will go through the site specifics . In general with respect to the two Towns and specifically with respect With Peabody in order to clarify exactly what we are here for and what we are trying and how we fulfill our obligations under the Wetlands Protection Act. We have several varieties of ', resource areas here . We have the North River Channel , Land Under Water Body; we have in brown on this lan t P he bank the river bank which is also a specific protected resource area. We have areas of vegetation, whether they are potentially eordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW) or not is something that we have to ascertain under this proposal . We also have an area described by the FEMA maps and through the Conservancy District in Peabody, well FEMA maps, an area of Bordering Land Subject To Flooding . Each of these categories are specifically identified in the ACT . in addition there is the potential for Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, small pocketed areas which are potentially subject to flooding. I have been on the site , identified those. resource areas which are present, specifically on the overall site . Page 14 MR . SOMMER : We do have Land Under Water Body. We do have Bank. We do have Bordering Land Subject to Flooding, all the cross hatched, hatched yellow area ( Showed on plan ) I also identified three areas of interest with respect to ' vegetation and potential water storage as isolated land subject to flooding. Specifically in Peabody we have land under water 6ody, bank, this area of vegetative community and the bordering land subject to flooding. I ' d like to go through these performance standards just quickly to indicate how we have complied. As far as bank is concerned, I took these in numerical order from 310CMR 10 regulations , that' s why there taken in this order. �n Peabody, we have Bank, that' s a resource ea. We are staying, we have defined a 100 foot buffer zone from that resource area.� �w�'e have no plans for altering the stability of the bank, no chanqe to the water carrying capacity ,of this system. No change or effect to groundwater or surface water within the plans for the Peabody area. We are not altering the breeding habitat. You can see by that other plan , that there is absolutely no change occurring within the bank area. � Next, BVW, BVW is identified by the presence of identifying species , wetlands identifier species over 50s in an area adjacent to water course , an area of extreme wet which connects to a water course . We do not have a distinct bordering vegetative community due to the _presence of the railroad track system off of the North River Channel . There are some vegetative wetland plants present on the bank. These are acknowledged hut they are concurrent with the bank resource area and as such have been identified concurrently as a protected resource under 131 40 . So we simply are not altering in this proposal , we are not altering any BVW , we ' re not altering , as such we are not replicatinq or dealing with any abstract of the BVW, including rare and endanqered species , none have been identified for this area of Peabody and Salem. Land Under Water Bodies , it' s clear that if we are doing anything to the bank then obviously, we are not, there is no intrusive activity into the North River , Channel and as such we are having no impact on its carrying capacity, it' s ability to provide Page 15 MR . SOMMER : breeding habitat whether that exists or not in this particular water course . Bordering Land Subject to Flooding under 310CMR 10 57 , we ' clearly have a site which is involved with this resource area. And the Rules and Regulations for dealing with this type of , resource are very specific in that if we are altering the capacity to hold water , we have to compensate for that. I am not going to go into a lengthy discussion as to how compensation is going to occur, compensatory storage , Mr. McDowell will do that after I am through. We have the potential for Isolated Land Subject to Flooding. We do have in fact, an abandoned railroad spur in this area ( showed on plan ) shaded purple on the plan. This railroad spur is concrete on two sides , has railroad tracks literally going down into a mucky area and is supporting a type of supportinq cattails , phragmitiis , various wetlands plants. We have looked at the area, the calculations for the aerial extent of this railroad spur do not indicate , or indicate that it does not store the required 1/4 acre foot of water to an access of 6 inches during any given period of time during the year. We have simply a catchment area, concrete on either side and a railroad bed which has developed an impervious nature through time , through the accumulation of organic material and it is holding water, like a bathtub . It is not in our assessment , a resource area. There are a couple of other areas in Salem, just because they are on the plan, Z want to explain what they are . Adjacent to the railroad tracks there is an area of wetlands vegetation. In the very center, it is a low area in the very center, it may in fact have just barely 50% wetland species . Be that as it ma , it does not border a wat r course it Y e does not store water to the requisite 1/4 acre foot to 6 inches , it is not isolated land subject to flooding and it is not bordering vegetated wetland , it is on the other side of the railroad tracks . Similarly, there is a low area in here , which is supporting soft ' rush, some wetlands plants . It appears that the drainage is generally in this direction out of this area and again it does not satisfy the regulations , there is no distinct water, no distinct channel to the North River and Page 16 MR . SOMMER: there is no storage of water to make this significant area as isolated land subject to flooding . fde have provided in the NOI a more complete description of these areas . We are also attempting to make sure we are fulfilling our obligations with respect to 131 40 , in identifying the areas and pursuing and in pursuing this NOI are here before you because we feel that we have to fulfill those obligations . I ' ll turn this over to Jim McDowell with respect to the compensatory storage and drainage . James McDowell , Eastern Land Survey Associates , Inc . Peabody. MA MR. MCDOWELL: Thank you. In preparing the site design for the proposed Stop & Shop in Peabody and Salem. one of the very early tasks we entered into was an analysis of the site in its present condition and we went through various gradings studies to develop a site that in its ' proposed conditions would conform with the requirements for acti�ix-�es in bordering land subject to flooding. �Namely that the various flood storage volumes , existing a various increments of elevations , one foot in this particular case , after development would be at least equal to or greater than those flood storage volumes that exist today on the site� On the Peabody side of the project, the FEMA flood plain, which I an approximately qoing to trace out here for you , runs at elevation 12 , right up to Howley St. and of course up to and across the railroad to the North River. As the property crosses the boundary, that elevation drops to elevation 11 in Salem. After the design of the grading , we performed several cross sections through the property in order to determine the incremental volumes that existed today and could exist after the proposed development of the property. Attachment E in the NOI which I ' ll read the key figures from, summarizes the resu�ts of those calculations . And I will read t.�ese on an elevation by elevation basis . In the existing condition between 7 and 8 , �is the lowest elevation that was found by survey to exist on the site , there are 889 cubic feet presently of flood storage capability. in the proposed condition, there will be a total of 8326 cubic feet or approximately 9 times that ! storaqe� I Page 17 MR . t4CDOWELL: A significant part of that storage , compensatory storage occurs in this area that I 'm showing on this portion of the site here ( showed on plan ) the area is split into 2 separate catchments , one catchment will receive the run off coming from the back portion of the building. We ' ll talk about the drainage system in more detail in a minute . Will receive the overland runoff cominq from the loading area portion and runoff from the existing bank from the various properties out here (As he is talking , he is pointing to �� areas on the map ) by means of a paved swale / h into this area. his front catchment area �� will actually function somewhat as a detention C L facility. The back one is not designed to � �� / � function as detention, but rather to provide �� more than adequate compensatory storage , especially between elevations 7 and 9 . � L Between elevations 8 and 9 , there is presently , � �(/ 9137 cubic feet of storage on the site and in the proposed conditions there will be some 34 , 700 cubic feet of storage . Between elevations 9 and 10 , there are 43 , 462 cubic ��/ feet of storage in the present co.ndition. In ( Lfi ` .—� the proposed conditions there will be some �� s.� 48 , 337 cubic feet. Between elevations 10 and ,�v � � � il again in the existing condition there is a l � �� little over 111 , 000 cubic feet, in the � � proposed condition it will be a bit over � A G � 112 ,000 cubic feet. And with respect to ( V �� elevation 12 , which is really only applying to � ,J � � �� ,the Peabody side per the FEMA flood map, there v is presently 68 , 350 cubic feet of storage and � J //�! , �d� in the proposed condition there will be a ��C / /� !-�� V 116 , 350 cubic feet of storage . The obvious W 5( 6� ��L reason for presenting all that information is �(, � to show that design of the site , the grading � J � of the site has been accomplished in such a � Y7^ � manner that, that performance standard is E�� satisfied or exceeded in all cases on the incrementent elevations . With respect to the proposed building , the building has been designed with a slab , the lowest floor elevation of elevation 12 . 5 , or approximately, or exactly 6 inches above the 100 year flood plain on the Peabody side . There are no 6asement or mechanical areas below that slab , that is the lowest grade that will exist on the building on the site . Page 18 MR . htCDOWELL : With respect to the storm drainage system, there really are two kind of distinct systems that will join together in the middle of the site . The front parking lot is tc be drained by a series of 4 catch basins , as indicated on the drawing , each of those basins will have kind of a bowl effect around it and high points in between . The basins , the piping , in this case because of the flatness of the site we are proposing a 1 foot high by 4 foot wide cast in place concrete channel , rather than the usual 12 or 18 inch concrete pipe to conduct the runoff to a point in Salem that 2 'm indicating here as a proposed drain manhole . The backside of the property and again the banking and the back yards of the various homes here in Salem will all drain ultimately to this catchment area as I referred to here with the back areas of compensatory equalized. There is an outlet proposed 12 inch drain, outletting from that again connecting to this proposed drain manhole . The roof drains from the building will also connect to that manhole . From the drain manhole , we are proposing to construct an open concrete channel , again on the Salem side , but this will be the outlet for the entire drainage system to the North River . The concrete channel is being reviewed and will require approval by the MBTA because _it is cros in their trackage an o viously will require action y e Salem Conservation ' Commission because that is r_he one place where the bank of the North River will be penetrated by the drainage system. Propose the concrete open channel , because it allows a free water s�rface , allows the system to work better if you wili with the fluctuations of the North River . The various catch basins in the front portion of the site as well as the outlet for this proposed area back here will all be designed with appropriate gas traps . The Stop & Shop policy on clean-out of such ieatures is to inspect them on a quarterly basis , 4 x ' s a r� year and clean them at any rate , once a year ,f ` whether it is needed to be cleaned or not. �/ The 2 areas 6ack here , compensatory, the catchment area and compensatory area orill be lined with stone riprap and are designed to be free drainage following the conclusion of an extreme rainfall event or a flooding event. Page 19 / w� �� MR. MCDOWELL : We have several other environmental controls proposed for the site and I think, Paul it would be appropriate for you to speak to those . MR . SOMMER : Erosion and siltation controls although are not readily evident on this plan, the one underneath but I ' m not aoing to make it move , cae do have a complete line , actually following the property line proposed erosion and sedimentation control by joint haybale and silt fence to be installed per the usual, or the accepted method by DEP . That is essentially as far as Peabody' s concerned the major management technique that we ' re proposing however, all catch basins will be covered during construction so as to eliminate erosion during the constructive process to the basins and to the river and controls will be set in place in order to contain all materials that are mobilized during the constructive process . Sumps will be cleaned on a regular basis just to maintain and assure no transport of silt and sediment into the North River system offsite as far as Peabody is concerned but on site , we will control all of the storm drainage system until such time as it is appropriate to uncover those manholes and have a fully operational system . MR . 1iCDOWELL: I think one other thinq to add Paul , because it is a regular question from the Commission and certainly not zone iike this important issue , is how the building will be heated. The building will be heated by natural gas . There is gas available on Howley St. There is no proposal or plan for any underground tankage on the site or any storage of. . . chemicals . At this point , it �vould be best if we could answer any questions the Commission or the public might have . MR. HORRIGAN: On the flow of water out in a 100 year storm , is it more now with this change than before? MR. MCDOWELL : The 100 year storm is an unique event to analyze in this particular case , Mr. Horrigan, because in 100 year storm this site is already covered with water . As is the North River and a good portion of Howley St . Page 20 MR. t4CDOWELL: There would certainly be some increase in runoff from the site , yes , to the North River. eecause the site today contains several buildings , these dotted building outlines ( showed on plan ) certainly a far amount of impervious area, represented by those , the old foundations which are in the front of the site . The balance of the site is mixed, there is a bit of bituminous concrete , but primarily it is a soiled surface , fairly compact soil surface . Not a virgin gravel or anything as far as allowing infiltration. But there is some infiltration capability today. I believe that this catchment functioning as a detention area will help diminish the impact. MR . HORRZGAN : Is there any difference in the peak level that you ' re qoing to see or elevations from that type of storm. MR. t4CDOWELL : As far as the flood elevations? I don' t believe there will be a change . Although we are showing an increased flood storage capability on the site , given the size of the catchment area and the fact that the North River in a full flood situation as beinq heavily influenced by the tide as well as by , runoff , I don ' t believe that there will be any measurable change as a result of this project one way or the other. MR . rfARINO : Mr. Horrigan, (Yes ) actually its almost doubled. . . 116 ,000 some odd, you also must have factored it in through TR 55 , especially with your buildings that are existing there in the flood plain, so there actually already down and putting a new building in there , just almost rule of thumb, pretty similar. MR . MCDOWELL: It is not a dissimilar situation , as they say, there is the capability on the site today in some areas for some infiltration. But a far amount of the site which consists of the buildings or the old concrete foundations on Howley St. , a least one bituminous road way that runs through there and again a lot of the soil areas which are old industrial yard areas , area very very compact soils so have minimal infiltration capacity. Again you right the difference is not great. Page 21 � MR . t4ARIN0 : Now thac you mention soil , where will be the ' actual area during the excavation will you be storing that material? MR . hiCDOWELL : The material that ' s excavated will by and large be removed from the site . As you can see from those flood storage volume calculations , with the exception of some engineered fill under the building slab, in this area and that fill will have a typical depth of 3 feet or less , especially as you move here toward the banking . There is a fair amount of soil removal that will occur, especially in the front portion of the site and to an extent the back portion of the site . That will be excess material and will be removed from the site in accordance with the City' s earth removal . . . MR . MARINO : I think I may have throw a curve here , what I 'm getting at is , is removing that and doing that excavating, your probably, are they just going to put it directly into trucks and moving it right out . MR. MCDOWELL: I would expect, given the staging of this it would be the best way to work, there maybe some stockpile areas , but they will be pretty small . Those stockpiles could be stored up on this portion of the site away from any of the floodinq activities and so forth. MR. PfARINO : Would it be first those block house , they call them with the chimney' s , are they going to go first? MR. MCDOWELL: That area would be a logical place to start. The site demolition would proba6ly occur before any site excavation. hiR. t•tARINO : Also your 8000 gallon , I don ' t think you mentioned much on the sewerage capability there . MR. MCDOWELL : Okay, let me discuss that. The waste water from the site is going to be collected from this part of the building. There are actually 2 collection points ; one point is an 8000 gallon grease trap , that will pick up any interior water that in any way comes in contact with food preparation , being the wash Page 22 MR. MCDOWELL: reprocessing or anything of that nature . The sanitary waste will come from a separate line and the outfall , outilow from the grease traps from a separate line into a proposed pump station located here ( Showed on Plan ) and then there will be a fourth sewer come back out to the existing sewer on Howley St. The reason for the pump station and a fourth sewer is that by the time the mechanical people got done with the plumbing schematics and so forth for this, and given the fact that the Howley St. sewer is really rather shallow , we will probably only have 2 or 3 foot headers . That will be a new . . . , pump station with back up generator capability, probably tied in to the backup generation system of the building itself . MR. MARINO : The pads for the backup generator, those will be above flood plain? MR . MCDOWELL: Yes, I believe those are actually contained within the building. P1R . MARINO: And also those grease traps , will be built to the standard, that in a flood plain , it will not leak. . . MR. MCDOWELL: We ' re calling for the grease traps and the pump station accesses to be all bolted and gasketed covers which are the water tight type of covers . So that they are accessible , but in a flood situation they are water tight. MR . MARINO : So they will not purge . MR . MCDOWELL: Right. MS . ST . PIERRE : Are you done? ( Mr. Marino - Yes ) ( A Lady had her haad up ) First the Commission will ask questions and then it will be turned over to the public . Did I hear you see that there will be a net increase in run off of site? MR. MCDOWELL: Yes , there will be some increase , I don ' t have an exact figure , but I could certainly provide it to you . MS . ST . PIERRE : By what percentage , roughly? MR . MCDOWELL: Roughly, in the order of 15-200 . - - , Page 23 MS . ST . PIERRE : Have you looked at any caay that could be prevented? MR . MCDOWELL : Again , we ' ve looked at gathering the water Lrom the storage , the loading area , which is the back of the buildinq into this detention, this will function as a detention facility. I hesitate to use it, to call it strictly a detention facility because it has a dual function in this case . Stormwater detention, but also collection. The grade back here ( showed on plan ) heing elevation S approximately, are such that you really couldn ' t develop a proper cover to have a piped system collecting the water for this area, so allowing it into that catchment. But that caill serve a detention function. MS . ST . PIERRE : I think we would like to get a little more information. I understand that part of the site is in Salem and part of the site is in � Peabody, however, the resoUrce area, the North River. . MR. MCDOWELL: It ' s the resource area , yes , I understand. MS . ST . PIERRE : From my point of view, I ' m interested in the detention pond and how they' re desiqned and how they function. MR. MCDOWELL : We ' ll provide you with a full pre and post construction for a 10 and a 100 year. MS . ST . PIERRE : And if you can find ways to insure that the increased runoff is zero . Also had questions , Paul talked a little about the environmental controls in Peabody, could you also talk about the ones in Salem. MR. SOMMER : Essentially the same systems will be in affect. However, obviously the outfall here will be protected caith haybales . . . . we ' re assuming that we will band this pipe with the haybales and similar, exactly the same system , both silt fence and haybales in order to assure that materials moving into this control area , runoff control area, is run through a filtration system prior to its release . Page 24 MR. SOMMER : Obviously as we generate construction activities with this culvert , we will necessarily providing similar protection at the edge of the North River . MR . HORRIGAN : Is that described someplace? MR. SOMMER : Not in our filing before this Commission. It was in Salem. Certainly, again, it is very difficult , we ' re working with 2 towns , and I hope you understand that in my presentation, I tried to incorporate Salem. I just didn ' t know how much of the nitty gritty you want. MS . ST. PIERRE : I think for example , a lot of the runoff , pretty much the drainage plan and taking the drainage from Peabody directing it through Salem, to the North River, so I think we would like to see the details . MR. SOMMER: okay. MS . ST . PIERRE : I would just like you to elaborate more , why � you feel it is necessary to have concrete drainage swales when vegetative swales would � do a better job attenuating pollutants? MR. MCDOWELL: I absolutely agree with you , that they would do a better job. The prohlem we have in the front is, #1 . we have a large paved area coming very close to the lot line , we don' t have a lot room for vegetative , very frankly. The concrete channels have been proposed, again, it is a very flat site , it is in a flood plain and we have very minimal slopes available and conventional i in in a case P P 9 like this just doesn ' t develop a proper water way area. MR. HORRZGAN : What is the top of the concrete? I ' m interested in this piece that is going to the parking lot, is there grading on the top of it. MR. tdCDOWELL: No . There is individual catch basins connected to it. ( Showed in Plan) Catch basin, catch basin , these will be connected with 12 inch� duck o lined pip.ing. Man hole here which � would b�he beginning of the concrete channel to another manhole here , again under ground channel , basin , basin. Page 25 MR . HORRIGAN : Is that all solid? t4R . MCDOWELL: Yes , re-enforced concrete , full re-enforced concrete construction . As . . MS . ST . PIERRE : Those pipes are subsurface . MR . MCDOWELL : Yes , yes they are , as are the channels . The channels are under ground . You will not see them, I think a boxed culvert might be a better description . MS . ST . PIERRE : So when you say a concrete drainage swale , you mean a subsurface . MR. MCDOWELL: Yes , it is not a swale , it is a channel , or a boxed culvert. I think a boxed culvert would be a better way to consider it. The open portion however, will be from this man hole to the North River. Now the reason that is an open portion, is we are working with the MBTA to actually create a bridge . It ' ll be a re- enforced concrete abutment today, as opposed to , if you ever walked along a railroad, years ago , it was very common for them to where they had to bridge a small stream, use granite blocks . If you walked along a track and see the granite blocks and a little stream flowing underneath. Well this is the 20th century and we are not going to be building it out of the granite blocks , but rather re-enforced concrete . This channel caould be open , again to provide an adequate water way area. Side One - Taped ended - Turned over. MS . ST . PIERRE : . . . . to protect the resource area. It seems that you have a lot of paving . MR. PtCDOWELL: There is a lot of paving , yes . The area here , immediately adjacent is within a couple of feet of the line of the actual railroad , and the railroad is , and I 'm sure you ' ll get down to see it at some point, is a typical railroad, it is all rock 6allasted . There is virtually no vegetation going across the railroad bed and all we don ' t propose to put any there , because the railroad will just spray it out of existence any how. As we move down into this portion of the site we do have the capability of putting in some vegetation . Page 26 MR. MCDOWELL: However, the entire paved area is designed to flow to either these catch basins or this catchment area back here . None of it, is capable of going over the track if you will , it is all coming down into the site . So in that respect, any potential pollutants , I think the greatest opportunity there being, oil drippings and so forth from automobiles or trucks , will he captured in the within the very basins that will have the gas traps or , captured in here ( Showed on plan ) which again will be trapped. MR . SOMMER: If I may through the Chair , Z will add one other aspect, in the process of putting this together, one of the thoughts Z had , harkening back to the original filings by Chase Properties and the interest that was generated with respect to the fence and the trash barrier control type of fence that was used on that property, it would be my suggestion and I have a detail here that Z was going to present to the Commission for the fence , that the length of the area around to this point ( showed on plan ) that this type of fence be installed. I think it would be appropriate as far as any control of trash off-site , I think that we would also provide a maintenance type of schedule or the assessmenc, or agreement by Stop & Shop to police this barrier as Chase Properties is supposed to police theirs in order to provide for elimination of any trash going off-site . We also , obviously are not doing anything on the side of the existinq active railroad track and as such the vegetation which exists there will not be impacted in the least. MR . HORRIGAN: Are you doing any cleaning on the other side? MR . SOMMER: I think that is certainly something , I ' m sure Stop & Shop would be move than willing to agree to some clean-up along the area. MR. MCDOWELL: Providing that the railroad would allow them some access . MR. SOMMER : The property is indeed owned by the MBTA. MR . HORRIGAN : Could you people pursue that a little bit? Page 27 MS . ST . PIERRE : Related to that, would be any opportunities for creating public walk way. MR. SOMMER : That ' s because the property is owned in fee by the railroad, when we ' re talking to them absolutely, we could ask them. MR . BOGIGIAN : The City is doing that . MS . ST . PIERRE : If we could get a developer to do the walk ' way , that' s better. My last question is , can ' you put the building in Peabody and the , parking lot in Salem? MR. SOMMER: No , I don ' t think the site works . MR. MCDOWELL: «e ' ve been through a lot of discussion with Stop & Shop about building places , quite frankly. MR . tdARINO : Through you, Mr. Chairman , Jim, on the up to 20% on the net increases , is possible , I now the flood storage capacity and when you have FEMA building such along the ocean front and others , they put holding tanks under their buildings , is it possible to put a holding tank under that building and then purge it out that will increase your net increase to 20% MR. MCDOWELL: We can take a look at that . I seem to get a clear reading that the Commission would be looking for additional retention . MR. HORRIGAN : Joe . MR. BOGIGIAN: No , I 'm all set, I think it was a great presentation . MR . HORRIGAN : John, do you have anything else? No . Arthur, ' No . Anyone else , No . Curt - No . 4!e ' ll open it up for questions , now. Again , I caant to reiterate , we ' re just talking about wetlands act issues , we ' re only talking about flooding and controls and conservancy districts issues . That ' s is all we have anything to do with this particular Commission. I ' m going to set a limit of 4 minutes on each speaker and I 'm going to ask Councillor Slattery, if you would like to be the first one to speak. Thank you. Page 28 Councillor John Slattery, Councillor at Large , 20 Orchard St. COUNC . SLATTERY: Thank you , I ' d just like to point out to this Commission , that this project has been the subject of much acrimony among the neighborhoods . I know it is not in your purview, but Z do think, that you just need to be reminded of that, when you ' re going through that issues that you confront in making a determination whether to approve the project. 2 ' d also like you to pay close attention to the drainage , cause I haven ' t really heard anything here that satisfies me about the drainage from this site . Their having a net increase of 20% . I think by the time , after the amount of time this project' s been on the tahle here and in Salem, they should have had those issues ironed out before they came before you and the reason they don ' t have them ironed out is obviously there must be some problem with that and I think you need to look real closely at that before you make an decision. It would be pre-mature to make any decision without that information and I just urge you to make sure that everything that you can do to prevent this project from going through that you do , because it will be a real problem for the neighborhood up there , and I know it' s not within your purview again, but I feel that I should speak on behalf of the ' neighborhood. They' re not in favor of this project. Thank you . Greg MacGregor of the Law Firm in Boston MacGregor & Shay, ATTY. MACGREGOR: I represent the Ward 4 , Ward 6 Association as a special counsel . I 'm surprised that we ' re limited to 4 minutes , but I ' ll do my best to be brief. In conclusion. Here are the I questions I would have asked and wanted the answers to tonight, within the 4 minutes . What percentage of the flood storage lost hy this development occurs in Peabody? What percentage of flood storage compensation for that loss will be provided in Peabody? If the answer is none , all of it is over here in another community, by next question is , Is the NOI pending in the other Community and whether or not how does the applicant propose to assure , you , that the mitigation that they offer you, will actually happen? Page 29 ATTY. MACGREGOR : If it is never proposed in Salem, or conditioned in Salem, you won ' t get the promises you have been given . I would ask for all flood storage lost in Peabody, to be compensated for in Peabody . It is there choice where to pave . Those . . . . . requires the paving to be here and the building to be here . Largely in another community. Any more than some law requires what little compensation they want to provide , be over here . Now related to that, is why can ' t you provide 100% storage compensation like the wetlands act regulations require . Are you asking for a variance from the regulations , their performance standard for work in Bordering Land Subject to Flooding? If so , when are you going to ask for that Variance in a formal application, which has to be approved by the State as well . So you see a lot of important questions flow from their desire to build it this way. Now, also , next question , do Z understand that there is going to be connection to the river that does not now exist? If not, what is the mention of a 6 to 8 foot big culvert in the environmental studies that are being worked on to be submitted to the State? Is that culvert going to be somewhere in this vicinity ( Showed on plan ) Is it going to convey the drainage carried by the underqround pipes or swales or whatever those are from the parking lot? And aprepo your question, what treatment will be provided on site for that stormwater. Related to that, what percentage of all the drainage goes over here , why is so little land reserved for compensation7 Why are they hedging on their conclusion that this will be adequate to provide compensation? Why do they say that its not really going to provide compensation? Why is there an increase in the volume of the 100 year flood flows off-site , related to that is , is there going to be an increase in the rate of flow of the 100 year flood . I tell you , you have 2 inquiries there , volume and rate and you what to have answers to both and you want to have controls on both. And finally, I ' ll close with, Is there a hazardous waste cleanup that is going to have to take place on this site , under 21E and is it going to take place in conjunction with development, before development, after or when? Page 30 ATTY . bfACGREGOR: And what are the hazardous materials that have to be dealt with on the site and how do they relate to exposing this site to a whole different drainage plan and linking it to the river during rainfall . That was second to last. Last is , what plans that we ' ve looked at tonight have been filed with the Commission? MR . HORRIGAN : I would like to have a copy of your comments? ATTY. MACGREGOR : I ' d be glad to , make better use of my 4 minutes . So , what plans were filed with the Commission that have been presented tonight, related to that? What were the plans that were on file with the Commission for which the applicant seeks approval and when were they on file in relationship to when notice was given to abutters? An on that score , which I have to agree with Mr. DiMento , is very important pre-requisite to the Board hearing the matter, was the notice given and the form required under the ACT, telling those gettinq the notice , where they can see the plans? End of the 4 minutes . MR . HORRIGAN : Who was it that gave up their right to speak? I have three questions? MR . HORRIGAN : Did someone give up their right to speak? ATTY . MACGREGOR : He was asking, did someone yield while I was talking to give me an extra minute or two . Sure , I ' ll give up my time . ATTY. MACGREGOR: Thank you . ', MR . HORRZGAN ; Okay, what is your name? Marie Coca, 128 Lowell St. , Peabody. MR. HORRIGAN : Are you listed here ? No . I^7e11 . 2 ' m listed; Maureen Kiley MR . HORRIGAN : Let me just go through these , Joan FfcSweeney, do you wish to speak? MRS . MCSDIEENEY: Yes , I do . Page 31 7oan McSweeney, MRS . htCSWEENEY: I have 2 questions . Cities vary in their requirements . Z don ' t know how much of a buffer zone you ' re supposed for wetlands to have in Peabody. I have no idea what your figures are , but I was just concerned that it was being built on . a flood plain and what it is zoned for now. I did see a white snowy egret down there , Z don' t if its an endangered species but that' s been in the neighborhood in the area , for the last 2 years . I got some astonishing figures when I was listening to the man from Stop & Shop . Its 12 feet in elevation in Peabody, and 11 foot elevation in Salem and where all the heavy trucks are qoing to be unloading and everything, its an 8 foot elevation. I can ' t understand that. In your historic area, that the building is down belongs to Mrs . Buckley right now, we have planters there , in 1636 , this building was a fort, we have a lot of history right in that area and I really think it should be well documented before the area is given up. The Howly St. area coming down the hill , there is not much history there , it was buildinq that were built in the 1800 ' s . But to go back to 1638 and dismiss it is bad. On the river banks as it stands now, are hirds galore and vegetation on that site a group of whispering aspen trees, which I believe are inducive to flood plain, there is a business down there belonging to Mrs . Buckley , that I believe has a cellar constructed to accommodate flooding, one of the historic , one of the historians in Peabody told me that. Said to be a most interesting building and eligible for the national historic register . This area is in a flood plain, a designation in Peabody and Salem, I believe both . Harmony Grove Rd. is flooded several times a year and the area is flooded . Now we can drain off into the river all we want, but what about. . . floods , everything is coming back at us no matter what drainage system we have . I live in the area that ' s just beyond this wonderful ponds they' re going to build to jeopardize kids . i The river has shown no mercy, if spreads left and right on both sides . And I have serious considerations about this road here ( pointed to on map ) where all these big heavy trucks area going to unload in here . � Paqe 32 MRS . MCSWEENEY: This is the area that is 8 feet now. MR . HORRIGAN: Okay, Would you give us a copy of what you just went over. Somehow? MRS . MCSWEENEY: Lauqhed. . . MR . HORRIGAN : The next one listed here is Hoang Lam. Hoang Lam, 79 Beaver St. , Salem. MR. LAM: Tonight, I just come here and listen and 2 have no idea about those plans , because I think all of you experts about those things . I really don ' t know about those things . If I can , I just come here to oppose this proposal only and I can save my time for Mr . DiMento , who can speak to us . Thank you . MR. HORRIGAN : Thank you. Maureen Kiley? Maureen Kiley, 15 Bow St. , Salem, MA. MRS . KILEY: My concern with the proposal is for a variety , of reasons , since you are the Conservation Commission, I will request that you pay attention to the information presented by both of our attorneys, who have done much more research into the legal aspects and our rights then I have had time to do. I would request that you listen carefully to what they are saying because they are representing us , the people in the neighborhood , which will be directly impacted by this magnificent big box, as Mr. Keilty, likes to call it. We ' ll put the biggest box there that we can and we will take all the water apparently, that ' s going to be created in Peabody and drain it over to Salem. The hearittgs haven ' t occurred in Salem. You don' t have permission to do anything in Salem yet. How can you be given, as Mr. MacGregor, how can you possible give , assurances that there will not be a flooding problem in Peabody, because it is going to be solved in Salem, when there isn ' t even another meeting in Salem scheduled yet. I think those are requests that you must look at, demands that you must make of the Stop & Shop. They have to solve the problems that they create , in Peabody, at the Peahody Conservation Commission and not tell you that Salem is going to fix it, because in fact, many of the neighbors in Salem, much more than this room Page 33 MRS . KILEY : caill hold, have been to meeting after meeting and no one in Salem, have said go ahead, build these 2 catch basins , put all the water you want from Peabody there . Open up a hole in the bank of the North River, we ' ll take it all . No one has said, that' s okay and you need to be aware of that. Thank you . MR . HORRIGAN : Councillor Speliotis , did you want to talk on this , your name wasn ' t here ( on the list ) that' s why I haven ' t called you yet? Joyce Speliotis , MRS . SPELIOTIS : Yes , thank you. I have 2 questions , in the presentation they spoke of silt screens and hay bales systems to control run off , which means that they plan to run off into the North River and I 'm concerned about that. And my 2nd question is, has anyone done any subsurface exploration to determine if there is any hazardous material in the area of the railroad, because usually where there is railroad, there is some kind of contamination. And if they start construction and digging up earth, I mean, what is that going to do, with that contamination, that ' s going to disturb it and i find that disturbing and those are my 2 questions, because they did mention silt screens and haybales . MR . MARINO: Mr. Chairman, through you. The silt screens and haybales are basically when there excavating during constructi.on, to basically make sure that no siltation goes into the river. That' s the answer to your first question. Now on your second question , hasically can you go over that again? COUNC . SPELIOTIS : Okay, the second question, I 'm really still concerned about my first one , because I know they use it. . MR . MARINO : They use it in all the standard practices under the wetland protection act for all conservation commissions . COUNC . SPELIOTIS : I understand that, but I know they also use it for that reason to , for the purpose of run off . MR. MARINO : In perpetuity, you ' re saying , always? Page 34 COUNC . SPELIOTIS : They also use it to control run off . COMMISSION : No . MR . MARINO : The second question? COUNC . SPELIOTIS : The second question is , has anyone done any subsurface exploration to determine if there is any hazard material in the area of the railroad? MR . MARINO : What the learned counsel , Atty. MacGregor was stating , on a 21E , if something was to be found in that, immediately that would stop immediately the excavation of that there , whether it be in Salem or Peabody, the health departments , which have the strongest enforcement codes would enter in on the picture immediately, COUNC . SPELIOTZS : Well , when are they going to do the 21E? MR. HORRIGAN : Has it been done? ATTY. KEILTY: For the benefit of Stop & Shop , who has entered into the Purchase and Sales Agreement, there has been some exploration conducted and there has been some removal done by a prior owner of the land and that removal constituted much of the surface waste that was on the side , it additionally addressed some issues with respect to soils that were on the site and the Stop & Shop preliminary investigation has been completed and it is of a nature that would not deter Stop and Shop from goinq forward �oith its plans and conducting any remedial plan if necessary. MR . HORRIGAN: Let me just ask, MR . PERETZIAN : Were core samples taken, has any hazardous materials been taken? MR . HORRIGAN : Has a 21E been done on the site? ATTY. KEILTY: Yes , a preliminary 21E . MR. HORRIGAN: Well , let ' s say. . . ATTY. KEILTY: I ' d be happy to share the results of the 21E with this Commission. Page 35 MR . HORRIGAN : You say preliminary. ATTY . KEILTY: Phase I . There are usually 3 phases , sometimes 4 , that are . . . determine what is the subsurface soil consists of , secondly, is it contaminated and what extent is it contaminated to and then the second phase would be , what steps should be taken and whether or not we are out beyond or within compliance with the regulations , we would be happy to share that with the Commission. MR. MARZNO : In your NOI , it did say there were no . . . . ATTY. KEILTY: I will suggest, that if Stop & Shop were to go forward , there would be certain soils that would be taken off the site , yes . MR. MARINO : There were no borings , basically because it not coming under a title . . . . ATTY. KEILTY: There were borings . MR. MARINO : no , let me finish. Under title SA, you don' t have a title SA, because it is sewerage , because if you it in your NOI you did state , because its being sewerage , out to the 8.000 gallons and further we have sewerage out there and you don ' t have a title SA, so there was no borings as far as that is concerned. ATTY. KEILTY: That ' s correct. MR. SOMMER: There are numerous test borings and monitoring wells that have been installed on site and substantial number of chemical analysis which are presented in this Phase I report. MS . ST . PIERRE : Don ' t we usually provide that information? ATTY. KEILTY: No . MR. HORRIGAN: We usually ask for it. ATTY. KEILTY: And if we ' ve been asked, we are happy to share it. I don ' t mean to be obstinate , but there are competing interest with respect to the land owner vs . someone who wants to buy the land and attack whether or not there needs to be something done . To answer your question, no , there not usually shared with the Board. Page 36 MR. HORRIGAN : F]hy, I don ' t we go on then, the next one ' listed here is Pat Murphy. MRS . PfURPHY: I relinquish my time to the lawyer. MR . PERETZIAN : �9hich one? MRS . PfURPHY: Right here . ATTY. MACGREGOR: The extra time I already took. MR. HORRIGAN : An the last one 2 have listed is Attorney DiMento . Attorney William R. Dimento , 990 Paradise Road, Swampscott, HA. ATTY. DItdENTO : Here this evening representing Thomas Pyburn, the owner of the property on Howley St. who is an abutter and entitled to notice under the ACT . It always disturbs me . . . . It always disturbs me to come before a Commission that doesn ' t follow the statute . And I ' m going to address myself to procedure and I suggest to the Board. . . if you' re going to say something, speak up so that we can all hear you. MR. BOGIGIAN : Go ahead, I ' m listening. ATTY. DZtdENTO : It disturbs me , that members of the Commission , some who may some conflicts of interest or prejudice , may be involved in this public hearing , orhich is a public hearing under the �4GL , and not the Peabody Laws , because we knocv that you have no local wetland bylaw. And clearly, in the last issue , in reverse order and i 'm going to ignore the four minute rule , because the public law allows me an adequate opportunity to respond to anything at a public hearing which a developer is given 45 minutes . But the issue raised by Mr. Keilty and what your entitled to , I suggest to you people , before you conduct a continuation of this hearing , read your statute , Chapter 131 , Section 40 . As you know, this petition is suhject to hearings other cities . The City of Salem and is suhject to other proceedings and with certain filings and I read for you one section of Chapter 131 , Section 40 , that says . . . . MR. HORRIGAN : I would just assume you didn ' t give us. . . . . �'_ Page 37 ATTY . DIMENTO : And I would just assume read it, because it is important for you to understand . . . . MR. HORRIGAN : How long is this going to take? ATTY . DIMENTO : It is 2 sentences . MR. MARINO : Could you please give me the exact, what is it? MS . ST . PIERRE : He is reading from the ACT , not the regulations. ATTY. DIMENTO : Chapter 131 , Sec . 40, in which it states in Paragraph 1 , no such Notice , this meaning Notice of Intent, shall be sent before all permits , variances and approvals required by local bylaw with respect to the proposed activity, which are obtainable at the time of such notice have been obtained, except that such notice may be . . . . at the option of the applicant after the filing of an application or application for said permits , variances and approvals provided that such notice shall include any information submitted in connection with such permits, variances and approvals which is necessary to describe the affect of the proposed activity on the environment. Now that is reading from the statute . You were just asked a question , and you were told, well we have to ask for this material . You are entitled to it. I suggest that the Board should stop apologizing for being here , do your statutory job , demand these things from the applicant before you going any further. That ' s the law. MR. HORRIGAN; Do you have any concrete items to discuss with us . ATTY. DIMENTO : That ' s when you deny people their right to be heard. That' s a concrete right under Chapter 39 , 23c. MR . HORRIGAN : Are you going to give us any comments that relate to . . . ATTY. DIAfENTO : I have not heard enough about this development to think that this Conservation Commission, are either unaware or didn ' t care that there is hazardous waste on this site and yet has Page 38 ATTY. DIMENTO : only said that you �aill share a preliminary report rather than demand that it be filed , is more than a procedural item . That is a very substantive action , from my practice tefore many Conservation Commissions . And Z please , implore this Board to do their job at the local level . That ' s all I have to say. Thank you . MR . PERETZIAN : Mr. Chairman , some members of this Board have been accused of having a conflict of interest. MR . HORRIGAN : Yes , I ' ve been wanting to ask, do you have any basis for that, we ' d like to know what it is , that statement. ATTY. DZMENTO : I didn ' t say that you did have a conflict of interest. . . MR . HORRIGAN : You indicated to me , you . . . ATTY. DIMENTO : I have no idea who has been represented in the past from this Commission , I don ' t know whether the engineers have done any work al all . MR. HORRIGAN : You don ' t know then? ATTY. DIMENTO : And I don ' t mean either accuse anyone of being . . MR. HORRIGAN : Okay, fine , you yave no information that indicates that ' s the case . ATTY. DIMENTO: Absolutely not, if that was the impression that was not the one I intended to make . MR . HORRIGAN : Why don ' t we go on. MR. MARINO : Verbally and eye contact, it was . ATTY. DIMENTO : I was reacting to the undertone 6y this member , who I don ' t even know his name . MR. MARINO : There was eye contact there , sir. MR. HORRIGAN : Why don ' t we go on . John, Let' s go on with the meeting. Does the Commission have any other questions they want to ask? I Page 39 MR . PERETZIAN : I noticed that Miss Otto is here from the Community Development Department , and I would like to know what Community Development feels about this project. MR. BOGIGIAN: One second, Councillor Moutsoulas made an indication that he would like to speak. COUNC . MOUTSOULAS : Thank you Mr . Chairman, 2 am Jim Moutsoulas , I ' m the Ward 3 , Ward Councillor . I really don ' t have anything to add here , I ' m just here to show support for the neighborhood that Z represent and I think that it is very important that you know that the neighborhood that I represent is 100% against this project and I hope you would consider their feelings when making a decision. Thank you. MR. HORRIGAN: Okay what is the wish of the Commission? MR. PERETZIAN : I want to hear Miss Otto . Judy Otto , Assistant Planning Director for the City of Peabody MS . OTTO: The Community Development has looked at these plans and we appreciate the comments and questions that have been raised by the Commission members tonight. I think these are all valid concerns that you ' ve raised and they all deserve answers . A couple of points I ' d like to hring to your attention , this notion that Peabody will drain Peabody' s drainage and Salem will drain Salem ' s drainage seems to me , perplexity in an era in which we are trying very hard to work regionally. We of the Peabody Planning Department have had conversations with the Salem Planning Department about this project in the past and will continue to do so and I think and I would suggest to the Commission, you also certainly have the opportunity to go to the Salem Conservation Commission hearings and hear the project. But in any case , both Commissions will be wanting to treat this as one integral project, no divide into 2 lines , 2 individual , projects because I think it makes logical sense that no parking lot is going to be built in Peabody before a project is approved in Salem and the issue of regionalism and sharing information and working together , I think is something sadly that has been lacking from some of the questions that have raised . Page 40 PtS . OTTO : We would also like to offer our help in any research that the Commission feels we might be / ab.Le�,� el o with, I speak particnlarly to I �� > andscape issues because you have raised them �(� �k `'�✓�� and some members of the public have raised ht' �l � them. We will be reviewing other issues ` 5 outside of this Board ' s purview with respect to urban design issues and landscaping issues , j but if you feel that anything we can provide ' for you will be helpful for you, we ' d be more ' than h appy to provide it. MR . HORRIGAN: Thank you. Yes . Maureen Kiley, 15 Bow St. MRS . KILEY: I just wanted to clarify that I am a resident in Salem and I deeply appreciate the announcement that this is a regional issue . However, I have been trapeezing for a year between 2 cities, hearing in one city one set of facts and going to another city and hearing the same gentlemen present a different set of facts , so if you ' re communicating so well , why are the neighbors in Salem forced to run back and forth for over a year and forced to hire an attorney, forced to get legal assistance in order to get the reports that you ' re so willing to share . This is not regionalization. I just need to say that in fact, I wish that the Stop & Shop words that we read in the paper about how often they' ve asked to sit down with the neiahbors were true . They are not true . MR. HORRIGAN : We will try to do our best and be fair. MRS . KILEY: Because the neighbors would appreciate the information, she says , you ' re working regionally to determine . Because we are not told and the facts that we are presented in our city, frequently are different then the facts that are presented in yours . D1R . HORRIGAN : Thank you. Yes . MS . ST . PIERRE : I ' d just like to ask, when will the NOI be filed in Salem and why had it not been filed? Page 41 ATTY . KEILTY : Salem has yet to schedule it PUD hearing , I hopeful that the schedule will be made tomorrow evening and I would expect immediately thereafter , the local filing will be made . MS . ST . PZERRE : But you don ' t necessarily have to have the PUD or do you in Salem have to have your PUD . ATTY . KEILTY : Not necessarily, no . MR . HORRIGAN : We would also like to have a schedule of your licensing process . MR . MARINO : Excuse me , and also , through you Mr. Chairman , there has been instances where Commissions on bordering lines and you can file under one file number and both Commissions can work as a conduit. So where they haven ' t received their file number and had no notice actually brought to them, I think with a letter through this Commission the possibility both Commission could work it as a conduit and resolve the issues of the neighbors . MS . ST. PIERRE : We might want to ask the Salem Conservation Commission if they would like to join the site walk, they could say no , but they could say yes , it wouldn ' t hurt to ask. ATTY. DIMENTO : Could I address the Commission? ( yes � The tdayor of Salem wrote you a letter a year ago , asking you to meet with. . . . MR . HORRIGAN : The Conservation Commission? ATTY. DIMENTO : The City of Peabody. . . MR. HORRIGAN : We don ' t get the city mail . ATTY. DIMENTO : It was a request from the Mayor of Salem to the City of Peabody and the City of Salem to meet the Conservation Commissions to meet and address the issues . MR . MARINO : If there is such a letter, I ' d like to see it, please fax it to Marilyn , I ' d appreciate it. ATTY . DIMENTO : I ' d be happy to do it tomorrow, I have a copy of it. Page 42 MR . HORRIGAN : P7e still have quite a bit of work to do here , I don ' t believe cre are qoing to get much further on this tonight, why don ' t we continue and see , what is the wish of the Commission? MS . ST . PZERRE : idake a motion to continue the pu6lic hearing and ore need a lot more information from the applicant and see iz we can set up a sit,e�/ ` visit and also ask the Salem Conservati6nc� Commission to join us at that site visit. . MR . t4ARIN0 : And also , I would like to see the calculations from Eastern Survey, be given to our residen`t�c� engineer to peruse through also at the time . MS . ST . PIERRE : Well once we get all the calculations . . . MR . MARINO : Right , as of the stand now, I think he could start erorking on those . . ATTY . DIMENTO : How will we know what the continuance is to? M5 . ST . PIERRE : Should we just set a date now, because there are so many people here? MR . HORRIGAN: Either June 8 or 22? DZSCUSSED DATE TO CONTINUE TO AND SZTE VISIT . tdR . MARINO: Just for the record , Mr. Chairman , I ' d like a show oi hands of the , I myself walked the site , has anybody in the Commission o�alked the site? 4 Members right here , Arthur Peretzian, Andrew Cotreau , Joseph Bogigian, Joseph Horrigan and myself . 5 Members that have walked the site already too . ATTY . KEILTY: Could I speak to the issue of the site visit date , only because my thought , is that some concerns may arise looking at the site and there may be some additional information requested of the Hoard having seen the site and it might give us , if it was a little earlier than the 4th , if at all possible might give us an opportunity to provide you with that information . MR. PERETZIAN : Good idea . DISCUSSED DATES . � Page 43 ' MR . HORRZGAN : Curt, �aill you make sure you call the Conservation Commission in Salem and make sure they know about it and tell them their invited and ore ' 11 folloca it up with a letter. But I ' d like them to know as soon as possible . MR . PERETZIAN : Tomorroca morning . t4R. MARINO : And could vou send , possibly what we have exactly what we have to their Chairman, to their Commission so that they won ' t be in the blind. MR. BELLAVANCE : Sure . MR. MARINO : Good . t4R . HORRIGAN : You ' ve taken notes to know what we need? ATTY. KEILTY: Yes . MR. HORRIGAN : I have a motion to continue the meeting until June 8 , do I hear a second. MR . COTREAU : Second . MR. HORRIGAN: Any discussion , all in favor say aye , 7 ayes . Motion carries . i le M * h # * M1 , SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING ATTORNEYS AT �AW 63 FEDERALSTREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETT501970 JONN R_ SERAFINI, SR, TEIEPHONE JO„N p. SERnFINI,JR. 508-�94�0212 JOMN E. OARLING 61%�581-2743 ELLEN M.WINKLER TELECOPIER JOSEPM Q COPRENTI SOB-�n��4683 August 9, 1995 HAND DELIVER Frederick J. Harney, Jr. Chairman, Conservation Commission City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Response to Written Comments of Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. ("Gulf of Maine"j Concerning the Notice of Intent Filed By Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, ' Boston Street and Howley Street, Salem and Peabody Massachusetts Dear Chairman Harney: This response is presented on behalf of the Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. , Inc. and John C. Jeffers (collectively "Stop & Shop") to the written comments of Gulf of Maine dated July 19, 1995 which were submitted to the Commission. The responses below are numbered to correspond with the comments listed in the Gulf of Maine Letter, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1. It is correct that a portion of the Site is a Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") Location To Be Investigated ("LTBI") . A copy of the draft Environmental Site Assessment report dated July 14, 1993 prepared by GZA Geo-Environmental, Inc. has been filed with the Conservation Commission as well as a copy provided to Gulf of Maine. The Executive Summary of the GZA Report was submitted to the Commission during the July 20 public hearing and marked as Exhibit 5. 2 . Should remediation be necessary, all required filing fees will be paid. Frederick J. Harney, Jr. August 9, 1995 Page 2 3 . Stop & Shop acknowledges that the canal which runs adjacent to the Site is tidally influenced; however, no intrusion of salinity has been found in the canal along the Site. Since the resource area, Land Subject to Tidal Activity, has no specific performance standards, and since there is no adverse impact from the project, no further action is required. 4. Various soil and hydrology information has been provided to Gulf of Maine. Stop & Shop does not believe that there are an federal wetlands located on the Site• however even if Y , , certain areas were deemed federal wetlands, they are under 5,000 square feet in area and thus entitled to a Programmatic General Permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. (See letter from Sommer Environmental dated August 7, 1995, and attachment thereto (Exhibit B) . 5. Exhibit 1 prepared by VHB, Inc. has examined and analyzed the North River elevations during storm events and storm damage as a result of flooding. The stormwater calculations prepared by Eastern Land Survey, Inc. which were submitted and marked as Exhibit 2 during the July 20 public hearing also address this issue. 6. The information concerning the Point Source Discharge has been provided through Exhibit 1, the VHB, Inc. submittal, which details the Outlet Culvert as well as the project's impact on the North River, and through Exhibit 2, the stormwater calculations. Additionally, the drainage system plans and topography of the Site have been provided with the Notice of Intent submittal. 7 . a. Sommer Environmental Technologies, Inc. has prepared a synopsis of the performance standards and how they are met for the resource areas affected by this project. This document was presented and marked as Exhibit 3 during the July 20 public hearing. b. In correspondence dated August 4 , 1995, Stop & Shop submitted a report prepared by VHB, Inc. which addresses how the gas and oil separators will function during major storms and flooding events. - Frederick J. Harney, Jr. August 9, 1995 Page 3 8. Land - Stop & Shop has voluntarily performed an environmental site assessment, the results of which were submitted to the Planning Board, the Board of Health, Gulf of Maine, and the Conservation Commission. In summary, two or three isolated areas of contamination around underground storage tanks have been identified. Stop & Shop proposes to remove the tanks and any contaminated surrounding soils prior to development of the site in accordance with existing State Department of Environmental Protection regulations. Groundwater monitoring wells at twenty locations within the site indicate no reportable concentrations of groundwater contamination. Water and Wetlands - Exhibit 1 submitted at the July 20 public hearing addresses the impact of the project on the North River. The conclusion of the submittal is that there will be an increase in flood storage capacity on the site after development. . Hay bales with biodegradable cordage will be utilized. . The Point Source Discharge will have no negative impact on the resource area Land Under Water Body and all of the performance standards for this resource area will be met as outlined in Exhibit 3 prepared by Sommer Environmental and submitted at the July 20 public hearing. . The River elevations and flooding are addressed in Exhibit 1, VHB submittal, Exhibit 2 , Stormwater Calculations, and in the August 4, 1995 submittal to the Commission which details the effects of various storms, and Stop & Shop's Best Management Practices associated with the drainage system. All of the water quality performance standards will be met, as outlined in Exhibit 3, and the effect of flooding on water quality is addressed in the August 4 submittal to the Commission in "AttacYiment A, 'First Flush' Documentation" . I Frederick J. Harney, Jr. August 9, 1995 Page 4 . At the July 2o public hearing the question was raised by the City consultant regarding the possible existence of Federal Wetlands on the Site. This area was identified as an abandoned railroad spur. Although Stop & Shop denies the existence of Federal Wetlands on the Site, the abandoned railroad spur in the northwest corner of the n¢� property is less than 5, 000 square feet in area and, yY therefore, pursuant to the Army Corps of Engineers n�`� �V- Programmatic General Permit, is automatically permitted and need not be replicated. (See Exhibit B attached �`� hereto. ) q( / U � 9. The drainage calculations requested are provided as Exhibit � e 2 to the July 20 public hearing. 10. The calculations will be signed and stamped by a registered� professional engineer as requested. 0 � 11. Stop & Shop believes that no Federal Wetlands exist on the � Site. However, even if the areas identified as potential Federal Wetlands are confirmed as such, such areas are under 5,000 square feet and, thus, entitled to a Programmatic General Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Exhibit 1 to the July 20 public hearing provides details regarding the culvert/outlet, the construction of which will not adversely affect the resource area Land Under Water Body. 12 . Stop & Shop agrees with the comment contained in paragraph 12 that no wildlife habitat evaluations are required. If the Commission requires any additional information we would be happy to provide such information upon request. Sincerely, THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY by its attorney, �� ;; % f �// "ft�Jt ��• ��-C.��2�:�i � ,,�� JOHN R. SERAFINI; `SR{ �i' J JRS,SR. /ln `' cc: Gulf of Maine Research Center, Inc. cc: Ransom Environmental Consultants, Inc. EXHIBIT A � GIILF OF MAINE RESEARCH CENTER INC ENVIRONMENT/►L CONSULI7NG SERVICES 201LAFAYETTE STREET �IU�y 19, 1995 SALEM,MA 01970 . (`�)715�818 FAX(SOB)T41-881g Mr.William I.ustez Selem Planning D'uector One Salem Cmxn Sakm,MA 01970 Dear Mr.Luster: I reviewed the Nodce of Iment and supporting documents submitted to the Salem Conscrvation Commission by the Stop&Shop Company on May 26, 1995 and, with my assistnnt Joseph Orul,inspecced the wedands and eusting condidons dttting a Site visit of the propetty. These are my findings. The Notice of Incent,plans and suppotting documentadon for the filing providc general and specific detail about the project but additional infocmarioa zegaiding the rrsou�e an�s and extent of flooding is naxssary. 1. NOI Focm rt I It�� Unda descri aon of the n o menuon is mede P P�l� of the fact thaz tfie property may be listed on the harerdous waste ' n , hsc oc as to whetha any remediation rs uired nor an aunons noted to be caken w n9 Y P+� hen work is to occur at the site to rotect the Wetlan p d Resouicc tUea end the Notth River from sitc con taminatiori. A famer mill propaty is 'c h,ted by the Massachusetts Depernnent of Environmental prvicecdon(DEI�as a Location To Be Investigated (I,TBn at 9 Howley SmxG Peabody(Siu 1�3-3319). I believe thaz this site is a portion of the propaty unda teview, 2. NOT Form Pan i_7c Should remediadon of the property yo necessery,an additional filing fce of$525 - $725 would be required. 3. Although no box is provided,the t�source anea,i,and Subjec[to Tidal Activity, should be entered and checl¢d. 4. NOI Fonn Pa,t Il _ Soila One of the smatl weUands not protected under[he Mass DEP Wetland Reguladons has wedend plants and hydrology and is a fedaal wctland. Soll and hydro]ogy infonnation azs necessary. GUIF OF MAMIE RESFMCH CENfER INC. 5. AIOl Focm-FlowinQ Water Bo�ec No mention is made of the natural fluctuadon of the elevacion of the Nonh River nor in fhe flucmation of the river elevaaon as a result of tlooding. 6. NOI Focm Pett$_�y� rintion Po'nt 90�Dic .h�„_,0��, '[h��xhazge to[he No�th River is a Poinc Source Discharge,pleaSe provide the necessary infortnation requiied in ittms 1-4. 7. NOI Fom�Part N- Midonrin M nc, rP� a. Please indicate how pvfocmance standaids will be met for Inland Bank; Inland Bo�dering Land Subject to klooding and Land Under Water Bodies. L,and Subject to Tidal Acdon does not have performance standsrds but the impact on the iesource azea should be addressai and any miagadng measures described, b. Please indicate how gas and oil seperacors will work dur;ng periods of flooding on the site. 8, Exhibit( - .n 'mmm �r�l i n�.c....�� I,�d. The Howlcy S�reet property may be listcd as a Site I,ocadon To Be Invesdgated by the Massachusetts Deparmunt of Environm�ntal protecdon, please indicate the pctenc of contaminadon and eny necessary temcdiation and the procedures m 6e taken to protxt the wedanda. Water ns �i Werta�aa 'i'here is a question iega�+ding whetha a not the proposed activicy shall result in moro frequent flooding on the gropecty. At this location,the Nonh River also includes the Resoiuoe Area Lend Subjccc co Tidal Action. Will th«e be any impacc from the project on this Resotmce Area? Hay bales with hiodegradable cordage should be utilized, What is the impact of construction and operadon of the new point souroe dischazgc on the Resource Anea I,and IJnder Water Body1 Describe the napaal and flood elevadon of the North River, What effett will this river elevation have on the water eicvation in the drtinage sysum,ln the runoff wata matrnent system and in the piesence of flood water at the siu? What wiU be the effect of flooding on water qualiry a�rhe sice? The arcs idenflfied in the northwest coma of the pcvperty as an abandoncd railroad spur containing greater than SO% wcdand vegetarion is actuapy a federal wedand and alieradons to this acea mnsc be pennittod by the U.S.Army Cocps of Engineus under the 404 Progrem. Therefine,a Mass Wata Quality Certificadon must also be obtained. Whece on the site will this wedand atea be replicated7 9. Exfi�bit D - ina¢� �n�lerinno Bah the pte and post development peak tvnoff rates shou]d be pmvided for both che 10 year and ]00 year stocm events. Ic appea:s cha[only the posc devolopment 10 year calculations are provid�d. � .- , GULF OF MAINE RESF�IRCH CEMfR INC. 'i'he calcularions should be sucmnaiiud and signed and stamped by a registercd profcssional engineer. 71�o proposed drainage sysncm and drainage calcularions have been icvicwcd by Chatles Quigley,the Salem Ciry Engineer. i0. F. hibit F.- VoI � ('et ilnrions The calculetions provided show an ovccall increase in flood storage volume es well as inaeases in flood storage at each incrzmrntal elevation. The calculations should be signed and stamped by a registeced professional engineer. 11. Fzhibit F-R�qpmr Arng��j�� The ieolated vegetated wedand is not called out as a federal wedand and shoald be delineattd as such. Adequate details are not provided on midgaaon measu�s to ptotect LUWB during constiuctionlanstalladon of open box culvert at the North River,and there is no mention of miagadon/replication of the federal weUand which will be filled(this wetland is located in Peabody.however). 12. Exhiblt G-HsbiL�Fv��adonc it is the opiution of GMRC t6at,under the tegulations,no wildlifc habitat evaluations are required The lineat length of Bacilc co bo a►teied is under the thieshold values of 1090 or SO feet,whichever is smaller(310 CMR 10.54(4)(a)(5)). Under the regularions (310 CMR 10.57(1)(a)(3)), aisas of Bordaing Lsnd Subject to Flooding "which have 6ecn so eztmsively altered by h�man acdvity that their icnportant wildllfe habitat funcdons have been effecdvely eliminated"do not mquite a habitat evaluation. On Jane 20. 1995, I eonducted a site inspection of the property ucompanied by my assistant, Joseph Oczel. The wetlands at the site weze inspected and evalua[od according to the Massachuutts Wedands Protcction Acc and Regularions. GMRC is iu ageement with the delineation under the Messachusetts Wedand Pmtection Act as submitted with the Noricc of Intenc for che projoct However,it shonld be noted that the isolatal wetiand acea described in che Notioe of Intent which concains gisater than 509'o wedand vegemrioa is a federal wedand and shwld bo delineaad as such. If you have any quesaons conceming this matter,please concect me ac chc letterhead addtess or phone number. S' oe�ely, Hug , ulligan,Ph.D.,1,S Ditector � EXHIBIT B � - �l'V�.MER ENVIRONMENTAL �'EC�-iN�LOGIE5 INC. . � - � ' 65 NEW SAI,EM STREET . � . ' � � wAKEFIE4A,MASSACHUSETTS U1880 . TELEPH�NE(Gt7 246-5360 � Auqust 7 , 1995 Atty. John Serdfini, Sr. , Serflfini, Sezafini & Darling 63 �'ederal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Stop & 8hop. Hovley St. , pmaboCy/Salem� M]► Non-etnta pe4erA1 .Turisdictionnl vetland Dear John: On August 1, 1995; Mr. Paul Sommer spoke ta M]C. , Michael Elliott of the U_S . Army Corps of Engineers in Waltham. As of " march 1, 1995 , the Corps of Engineers issued a Programmatic General Permit ("PGP��) (see attached) to apply .in conjunction with MGL Ch. 131, s40 (the Wetlands Protection Actj . Thls PGP provides for three categorias of work; Category I is a Non-Re- , porting Condition; Category II requires repo7rting and screening by the corps and Category TII requixes an individual psrmit Yor propo,sed wozk_ One issue raised by Dr. Hugh Mulligan af Gulf or Maine Resources indicated that the railroad siding identifiefl as sup- _ porting wetlands vegetat.ion in Peabody, may be a federal juris- - clictinnal wetland. Under the PGP Definitzvns oP Category I (A) (a) , less than 5, 000 s.f. of wetland are .to be filled. Tn , faet, the area in questions is approximately a , 00o s. f: and as such is Han-Reportable aaork and covered under the PGP. TherefoXe, Stop & Shop does � need to file with the Corps for the propo�ed fillix�g of the railroad sidin9. Please do not hesitate. tp call me zegaXding this matter, should you have any questions. Very truly yours, SOMMER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOTAGIES, INC. � � ' � .. c .-✓- �' y� ' �/ .. - . . l: t��. ,�. .lJ-� " . �� 3 . � � �� , a 1 F. sommer P. u . �. 1 Presldent C,�-q` PF'S dan / serafini.mem . - . .....:� . . '�e'. .. � �-> _ ... _ -.�...�y .. �_:.: .. . . . _ . . �. � - ,. . . . � ' � `Pq. . . - . . ' . . . . . . _ . _ +�Y � . .. . � . . . � :�:A. Permit No. : 1993-01040 Effective Date: March 1, 1995 _ Expiration Date: March 1, 2000 � , II Applicant: General Public in N:assachusetts . - DEPARTMENT OF THE ARt�IY PROGRAMMATIC GENERAI. PERMIT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS '��. ;�� The New England Division of the U.S . 'Army Corps af Engineers hereby issues a � programmatic general permi.t that expedites review of minimal impact work in coastal and inland waters and wetlands within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Activities with minimal impacts, as specified by the terms and conditions of this general permit, are either non-reporting (provided required local and state permits and required state certifications are received) , or are to be scre :ned by the Corps and federal resource agencies for applicability under the general permit. The Corps individual permit review process, and activities exempt from Corps jurisdiction, are not affected by this general permit. Activities covered: work and structures that are located in, or that affect, navigable waters of the United States (regulate�' by the Corps under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899) ; and the d_scharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States ( regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Acti . Procedures A. State and Local Approvals For projects authorized pursuant to this general permit, when the following state approvals are also required, they must be obtained in order for this general permit authorization to be valid (applicants are responsible for ensuring that all required state licenses and approvais have be=n applied for and obtained) : (a) Final Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) (MGL c. 131 Section 40) must be obtained for activities subject to jurisdiction as defined in 310 CMFt 10 .02 . ' (b) 47aterways license or permit under MGL c. 91, from tne Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Division of Waterways must be obtained for activities subject to jurisdiction, as defined in 310 CMR 9.05 . (c) Water Quality Certi£ication is required for work in Corps jurisdiction involving =_ discharge to waters of the U.S . Soine projects require an individual 401 water quality certification (WQC) issued by the Massachusetts DEP before work can proceed (see page 9 for 401 wQC requirements) . " (d) Coastal Zone Management: Any project that meets the terms and conditions of Category Z of this general permit (i.e . , non-rznorting) , has been determined to be consistent with the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management plan and does not require any additional coastal zone management review. For work being screened under Category II of this general permit, the Corps will coordinate screening of any work in or affecting the coastal zone with the Office of Coastal Zone Management; for these projects applicants will be notified by the Corps if an individual CZM concurrence is required. B . Corps Authorization : Category I (Non-Reporting) - Work in Massachusetts that is subject to Corps jurisdiction (see `"_• Condition 2 on page 3) , that meets the definition of Category I on the Definition of Categories sheet (attached) , and that meets a11 of this � 1 1/1/95 �„;�r, F� "��. ti� .•��:: tKZ . . . . . . . � � - '._�i:s: 1 i . `__4��.. � permit's other conditions may proceed without application or notification to �; the Corps provided the required federal, state and local authorizations are �" obtained. Note that the review thresholds under Cateqory Z applv to sinqle, =:;� complete proiects only (see �ondition 5) . Also, note that Category I does '�;�- not apply to activities occurring in a component of, or within 0.25 mile of a :'r�: component of, the National Wild and Scenic River Svstem (see Condition 9, and :°'- page 6 for listed rivers in r.assachusetts) . Work that is not subject to the Massachuse:ts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) , but is subject to Corps jurisdiction, is eligible for Corps authorization under this PGP; although an Order of Conditions is not required, the general permit review thresholds and requirements concerning WQC and CZM consistency apply. Such projects could include activities that are exempt from the WPA, and activities in federal wetlands (e.g. , isolated wetlands) , that are not covered under the WPA. Although Category I projects are non-reporting, the Corps reserves the right to require review for an individual permit if there are concerns for the aquatic envirorunent or a�,y other factor of the public interest (see Condition 9 on Discretionary Authority) . C. Cox�ps Authorization : Category IZ (Screening) For projects that do not meet the non-reporting thresholds apnlicants are required to submit an application to the Corps for a case-by-case determination of applicability under this general permit (Category II) . CateQory II proiects may not proceed until written notification is received from the Co�s, and the applicable certifications or waivers concerninq water quality and coastal zone manaaement (CZM) are received bv the apolicant. Applicants will be notified by the Corps if an individual CZM consistency concurrence is reauired. Ho=e that Category II does not anply to activities occurring in a component of, or wi�hin 0.25 mile of a component of, the National Wild and Scenic River Svstem (see Condition 9, and page 8 for listed rivers in Massachusetts) . For Category II projects, applicants filing a notice of intent (NOI) with their local Conservation Commission should submit a copy of their NOI materials to the Corps at the same time they apply to their Commission, along with additional information concerning the work within Corps jurisdiction (see below) . Category II applicants shall submit a copy of their application materials to the Historic Preservatioa Officer at the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) to be reviewed for the presence of historic/archaeological resources in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed work. Applications to the Corps should include information to indicate that this has been done (aDplicant' s statement or a copy of their cover letter to MHC) . ' The Corps will detarmine if Category II applications G1) require additional information (see below) ; (2) are appropriate fo2"screening with the federal resource agencies (Environmental Protection Agency, U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service) ; (3) are ineligible under the terms and/or conditions of this general permit; or (4) will require individual permit review, irrespective of whether the terms and conditions of this general permit are met, based on concerns for the aquatic environment or ' any other factor of the public interest (see Condition 9 on Discretionary Authority) . Additional information required may include: (a) purpose of the project; r= (b) 8 1/2" by 11" plan views of the entire pzoperty and project limits with � existing and proposed conditions (leqible, rearoducible plans �- re4uired) ; p. 2 1/1/95 �-. . ...,,:� N ":.:':". .:'._.... . ,�:,.._. -wNvrSr J -r. . � ' .'_..� . '.� - '�.� . . . . ' .'..•.. .... . . . . . .. � ' ' . . .. . . . . . ..�pw ' . . . _' . " .'� . . . ... - . . .:.rt (c) wetland delineation for the site, information on the basis of the �;g of waterwa and wetland impact areas (see -, ' n n ions Y delineatio , a d calculat Conditioa 2 on a e 3) ; , _'" P 4 r - ection views of all wetland and waterway fill areas and d) t ical c oss s ( YP -:�. wetland replication areas; �: (e) delineation of submerged aquatic vegetation, e.g. , eelgrass beds, in a�; tidal waters; �=' (f) amount, type and source of fill material to be discharged i�to waters and �� ' h wa 'n ' ll below ordinar hi ter i wetlands, including the volume of fi Y 4 inland waters, and below the high tide line in coastal waters; (g) mean low, mean high water and high tide elevations in navigable waters; (h) limits of any Federal navigation project in the vicinity and State Plane coordinates for the limits of the proposed work closest to the Federal project; (i) alternatives analyses submitted to the DEP for WQC review, and/o�r additional information compiled on alternatives; (j ) for dredging projects include the volume of material and area in square feet to- be dredged below mean high water, existing and proposed water depths, type of dredging equipment to be used, nature of material (e .g. silty sand) , any existin� sediment grain size and bulk sediment chemistry data for the proposed or any nearby projects, information on the location and nature of municipal or ir.dustrial discharges and occurrence of any contaminant spills in or near the project area, location of th=_ disposal site (include locus sheet) . Additional information may be requested by the Corns; dredging apolicants may be required to conduct a shellfish survey, and sediment testinc, including physical, chemical and biological testing. D . Corps Authorization: Category IIZ (Individual Permit) Work that is in Category III on the attached Definition of Categories sheet, or that does not meet the terms and conditions of this general permit, will require an application for an individual permit from the Coros of Engineers (see 33 CFR Part 325 . 1) . The screening procedures outlined above will only serve to delay project review in such cases . The aporooriate application materials (including either the NOI joint application form or the Ccrps application form) should be submitted by the applicant at the earliest possible date; general information and application forms can be obtained at (617 ) 647-8338 . Individual water quality certification and coastal zone management consistency concurrence will be required. E . Proqrammatic General Permit Conditions : The following conditions agply to activities authorized under the Psogrammat:c Genetal Permit, including all Cateqory I (non-reportinq) �and Category II (screening) activities: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: - 1. Other Permits. Authotization under this general permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Fedeial, state, ot local authorizations tequired by law. - . 2. Apolicabilitv of this eneral aermit stall be evaluated with reference to Federal jutisdictional boundaries. P.pplicants are responsible foc ensuring that the boundaries used satisfy the fedeial cziteria defined at 33 CFR 328-329. - 3. Minimal Effects . Projects aut:�orized by this gene=al permit shall have minimal .:.;� individual and cumulative adverse environmental impacts as determined by the Corps. �_�- "'�a P 3 1/1/95 _� :� _� ,. .. . . . . _ .•.,:. ..:..xc;�a . .. . ,,, �..;�:�. ..: . ..: . :�< - ' .�,a.:o ,:.. . ..... .. .. .,. _ ,.r�. . . .. . �.�:. . . ,::,.. .-;: h �,t ' . . _ '>:2} . � �L. 9. Discretionary Authotity. Notwithstanding compliance with the terms and conditions o£.. this permit, the Corps of Engineers retains discretionaty authozity to require =eview Eor��. an individual pezmit based on concerns foz the aquatic environment oz foz any othe= factor of the public intezest. This authotity is invoked on a case-by-case basis whenever the�� Corps determines that the potential. consequences of the proposal warrant individual reviesr. : based on the concerns stated above. This authority may be invoked foz projects with � "_"� cvmulative environmental impacts that aie more than minimal,- or iP there is a special ' zesource or concern associated aith a particular project, that is -not aluady covered by �` the remaining conditions of the PGP, that waztants greater zeview. - � � '��;�� Whenever the Corps notifies an applicant that an individual pexmit ma}• be zequized, authorization undet this general permit is voided, and no work may be conducted until.the � individual Co=ps permit is obtained, or until the Cotps notifies the applicant that furthet review has demonstrated that_�the work may proceed under this genezal permit. � . 5. Single and Complete Projects. This general permi.t shall not be used for piecemeal work and shall be applied to single and complete projects. All components of a single ptoject shall be treated togethez as constituting one single and complete project. Al1 planned phases of multi-phased projects shall be tzeated to.gether as constitLting one single and complete project. This general permit shall not be used fot any activity that is part of an overall project for which an individual permit is required. NATIONAL CONCERNS: - 6. Histotic Pzoperties. Any activity autho=ized by this general permit sha11 comnly with Section 106 of the National Histotic Ptesetvation Act. Information on the location and existence of historic tesources can be obtained from the Massachusetts Historic Presesvatior. Office and the National Register of Histotic Places. If the pezmittee, dusing construction of work authorized heiein, encounte=s a previously unidenti�ied archaeological or othet cultural resource within the azea subject to Department of the Army jurisdiction that might be eligible for listing in the National Register of Aistoric Places, he/she sha11 im�nediately notify the Divisior. Engineer. 7. National Lands. Activities authozized by this general permit shall not impinge upon the value of any National Wildlife Refuge, National Forest, National Mazine Sanctuary (e.g. Stellwaaen Bank) or any area adm:n:stered by the National Pazk Service (e.g. Cape � Cod National Seashore) . � � � H. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized under this general permit �.rhich may affect a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as � identified under the Federal Endangeted Species Act (ESA) ; or which is likely to desttoy oz adversely modify the critical habitat of such species; or which would zesult in a "take" of any threatened or endangezed species of fish or wildlife, or which would result � in any other violation of Section 9 of the ESA protectina thzeatened ot endangered species of plants. Applicants shall notify the Corps if any listed species or ctitical habitat is '1 notified-b the distr'rct v' cinit of the ro'ect and shall not begin work unti Y in the i y P 7 . f. �. the Endan ezed S ecies Act have been satis�ied and that enqineer that the requirements of 4 P the activity is authorized. Znfotmation on the location of threatened and endangered species and theix ctitical habitat can be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine £isheries Service (addresses attached, page 6) . 9. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity is authorized undez this genetal permit that occuzs in a component of, oi within 0.25 mile of a component of, the National Wild and Scenic Rivez System, including riveis officially designated by Congzess as study rivers for possible inclusion in the system, while such zivers aze in an official study status. Cuizent tivers that this applies to in Massachusetts aie listed on page B. - 10. Federal Navigation Project. Any structuze or work that extends closez to the - hotizontal limits of any Corps' navigation project than a distance of three times the `� �- project's authorized depth (see attached map foz locations of these p=ojects) shall b�l/9'S: �y��c. :,. p' 4 �'i �rs, '_ - . _:, - : . - r.�� _ -, J - -�. . -�. ,�<-: subject to removal at the owner's expense prior to any future Cozps' dredqing or the `` petformance of periodic hydrographie surveys. � . � � �`��' 11. Fede=al Liability. In issuing this pern�i.t, the Fedetal Government does not assume`-'`� any liability for the follo�+inq: (a) damages to the permitted project o= uses thereof as a"� result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes; (b) damaqes toY� � the permitted project or uses thereof as a =esult of cutrent or future activities . - �� -__ �� undeLtaken_by or on behalf of the..United States in the public interest; (c! damaqes to �: persons, property, or to other peimitted or unpetmi.tted activities or structures caused by ; =�;' the activity authorized by this permit; (d) design ot construction deficiencies associated =- with the permitted work; (e) damage claims associated with any future modification, , �' ,�� suspension, or revocation of this permit. .. 12.� Navigation. There shall be no unteasonable interference with navigation by the existence or use of the activity authorized herein, and no attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the activity authorized herein. MINZMIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: . 13. Minimization. Discharqes of dzedged or fill material into waters of the United States shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent ptacticable. � 14. Work in Wetlands. Heavy equipment aorking in wetlands shall be avoided if possible, and if required shall be placed on mats to minimize soil and vegetation disturbance. Disturbed areas in wetlands� shall be zestozed to preconstruction contours upon completion of the work. Zn many cases the mats are considered a dischatge of fill material and must be included in the quantification of -impact area, and authorized by this general permit. 15. Temporary Fill. Temporary fill in waters and wetlands authorized by this general . petmit (e.g. access roads, coffeidams) shall be properly stabilized during use -to prevent erosion. Temporary fill in aetlands shall be placed on qeotextile fabric laid on existing wetland qrade. Temporary fills shall be disnosed of at an upland site, suitably contained to prevent erosion and transport to a waterway or wetland. Temporary fill areas shall be restoced to their original contours. 16. Sedimentation and Erosion Control. Adequate sedimentation and erosion control management measures, practices and devices, such as phased consttuction, veqetated filtet strips, geotextile silt fences ot othez devices, shall be- installed and properly maintained to reduce erosion and retain sediment on-site during and after construction. They shall be capable of preventing erosion, of collecting sediment, suspended and floatinq matezials, and of filterinq fine sediment. These devices shall be removed upon completion of work and the disturbed areas shall be stabilized. The sediment collected by these devices shall be zemoved and placed at an upland location, in a manner that will prevent its later erosion into a waterway or wetland. All exposed soil and other fills - shall be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. 17. Watetway Crossinqs. (a) Al1 temporary and permanent crossings of waterbodies shall . be suitably culverted, bridged, o= otherwise designed to withstand and to pzevent the � restriction of high flows, and so as not to obsttuct the movement of aquatic life - � indigenous to the tiratetbody beyond the actual duration of construction. (b) No open - trench excavation shall be allowed in flowing waters. (c) Tempotary bridges, culverts, or _ cofferdams shall be used for equipment access across stiear.is (note: areas of fi11 and/ot _. cofferdams must be included in total waterWay/Netlands inpacts to determine applicability '%: of this genetal permit) . (d) Fot projects that otherwise meet the tecros of Category I, ',.� instream construction rrork shall be conducted during the low flow period July 15 - Octobet .�=:>y� 1 in any yeat; projects that aze not to be conducted during that time pe=iod ate "`-= {y p. 5 1/1/95 '` ` � � , .. ,,•i ,i'. . . . . .. . ..... .... .. .. K� ._._. ...,.. - . � . . , .. �. . _ , ..'..'.. . ..., .:. � ',. .. . . � � _ . - : �. . .:..: - . ..' � . ,. . ' ': ' �-.-:.' t. ... .. .- �--.. '� . �' . . . .. . . . ' .... .'� . . ._ . . -. - - }-?:i� ' � , - : . - . . .. . � � � . . ::,.,::� ineligible for Category I and shall be scteened pursuant to Category II, regardless of the�' �+aterway and .+etland fi1T and/o= impact azea. . . �;i,;i;"�, :2� 18. Discharge of Pollutants. All activities involving any discharge of pollutants into . xaters oE the United States authozized under this genezal permit shall be consistent with �� applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations, standaids of performance, - prohibitions, and pretieatment standatds and manag�ment practices established pursuant to � - the Clean Watez Act {33 U.S.C. 1251) , and applicable sta*.e and local laWs. IP applicable �� rater quality standards, limitations, etc., are revised or modified during the term of this permit, the authorized work shall be modified to� conform with these standards within � 6 months of the effective date of such revision ot mod�fication, or within a longer period of time deemed reasonable by the Division Engineer in consultation with the Reqional - Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. Applicants may presume that State - � water quality standards are met with issuance of the 901 Watez Quality Certi£ication. 19. Spawning A-_eas. Dischzrges in fish and shellfish spawning or nursery azeas duting spawning seasons shall be avoided, and impacts to these areas shall be avoided or minimi�zed to the maximum extent practicable du=ing all times of year. 20. Storage of Seasonal Stzuctuzes. Coastal stzuctures such as piet sections, floats, etc. , that are zerr,oved from the waterway for a portion of the year shall be stored in an upland location, located above mean high Nater znd not in salt marsh. 21. Environmental values. The permittee shall make every reasonable effort to carry out the construction or operation of the work authorized herein in a manner so as to main:ain , as much as is pzacticable, and to minimize any adve�se inoacts on, existing fish, wildlife, and natural environmental values. PROCEDURAL �ONDITIONS: 22. Inspections. The permittee .shall permit the Division Engineer or his � authorized representative (s) to make petiodic inspections at any time deemed necessazy in otdeZ to ensure that the work is beinq perfozmed in accordance with the terms and conditions of thi� permit. The Division Engineer may also require post-canstruction engineering drawings for completed work, and post-dredging survey drawings for any dredging wotk. 23. Maintenance. The permittee shall maintain the work or structuzes authorized herein in .good condition, includinq maintenance to ensure public safety. Diedging ptojects: note that this does not include maintenance of dredging projects. Maintenance dredging is . subject to the review thresholds on page 10, and/or any conditions included in a wzitten Corps authorization. 24. Propetty Rights. This permit does not convey any ptoperty zights, eithet in real estate or material, or any �xclusive pzivileges, nor does it authotize any injury to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal, State, or local laws or regulations. 25. Modi£ication, Suspension and Revocation. This perntit may be either modiEied, suspended, ot revoked in whole or in patt puzsuant to the policies and pzocedures of 33 CFR 325.7; and any such action shall not be the basis for any claim foz damages against the United States. � 26. Restoration. The permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of � authorization under this pezmit, shall restore the t+etland or xater�ray to its formez , conditions, Nithout expense to the United States and as directed by the Secietary of .. -- the Army or his authotized tepresentative. If the permittee fails to comply t+ith such a . ='-�' 6 1/1/95 :''.:4 . P• ��M'.'.�.. ' - - . '.4': '.......: . •.n� .. ' .... . .r �.. . .x ...e � . . . . ... . �. :..... . ' . '� "�. . ' � . .. . . . .. .. . ' .. :'...... . �i- . . . ... , . . ' . . .. . . . . . . ,.4�'.O � ' . . . ' . . . ' ' . . . ' 0:4 . . - . ' . . . . . - . . ' . ��:JY. Vi directive, the Sec=etary or his desiqnee may sestoze the wetland ot watesway to its fornier' condition, by cont=aet oi othen+ise, and zecover the eost from tha permi.ttee. . "'•'- 27. Special Conditions. The Corps may impose other special conditions on a project � t to this eneral ermit that are determined necessa=y to mi.nimize - authorized uzsuan 9 P P - adver se enviionmental effects or based on any othe= factor of the public inte=est. �• ;: :� Failnre to comply with all conditions of the authorization, includinq speeial conditions,::;,,`�: will constitute a pezmit violation and may subject the permittee to cziminal, civil, or .-��?�. administrative penalties, or restoration. �'�. ;�. 28. False or Incomplete Infotmation. If the Corps makes a determination regaZdinq the . � - eliqibility of a project under this permit, and subsequently discovers that it has zelied � , on false, incomplete oz inaccurate information provided by the permittee, the permit shall not be valid and the Government may institute appiopriate legal proceedings. . 29. Abandonment. If the permittee decides to abandon the activity authorized under this general permit, unless such abandonment is merely the transfer of property to a third party, he/she must restoce the atea to the satisfaction o£ the Division Enqineez. 30. Enforcement cases. This general pertnit does n�t apply to any existing o= proposed activity in Corps jurisdiction associated with an on-go+_ng Coips of Engineers enforcement action, until such tiine as the enforcement action is resolved or the Corps determines that the activity may ptoceed independent'_y aithout compromising the enforcement action. DURATION OF AUTHORIZATION/GAA2IDFATHERING: 31. Dutation of Authorization. Ac�ivities authorized under this general pe�it that have been commenced (i.e. , are under consttuction) or are undei conttact to commence in reliance upon this authorization will remain authorized provided the activity is completed � within twelve months of the date of the general permit's . expiration, modification, or revocation, unless discretionary authocity has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the authozization in accordance with 33 CcR 325.2 (e) (2) . Activities completed under the a�thorization of the qeneral permit that �+as in effect at the time the activity was comnleted will continue to be authoiized by the general permit. 32. Previously Authorized Activities. (a1 Activities which have commenced, i.e. are � undet construction or are under contiact to commence, prior to the issuance date of this qeneral permit, in reliance upon the terms and conditions of the non-reporting categoiy of the previous Massachusetts PG2, shall iemain authorized ptovided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of issuance of this general permit, unless discretionaiy authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the authorization in accordance with Condition 9. The applicant must be able to document to the Corps' satisfaction that the project was under construction or contract by the apptopriate date. (b) Projects that have received written veti£ication or approval from the Corps, based on applications made to the Cotps prior to -issvance of this general perm.it, for the previous Massachusetts PGP, Natiom+ide permits, regional general permits, or letters of permission shall remain authorized as specified in each authorization. (c) Activities authorized pursuant to 33 CFR Part 330.3 (activities occurring before � cettain dates) are not affected by this general permit. �- e�, L� z8 99 - � DI ICT ENG EER DATE '{;;;. p � 1/1/95 ��. . .�`,?�."� _-��, . .� ..y::- ..._. .. ' ........, f. .:.. . .:..r} nfi ..Y'.. _ ' r �u.. *. r.. � . . :��_,r:. � Coatacts for Programmatic General Pexmit: � - January 1, 1995 �- ' - J U.S. Army Cozps of Enqineers Coastal Zone Management "��-�� Regulatory Division 100 Cambridge Street 20th Floor - 424 Tiapelo Road Soston, Massachusetts 02202 -��_;� Waltham, Massachusetts 02259-9149 617-727-9530 �-�'k�` 617-697-8335 600-343-9789 (ME, VT, NH, RZ, CT) - 800-362-9367 (Massachusetts) � ' MassaChusetts Historical Commission National Park Service . The Massachusetts Archives Bldg. North Atlantic Region 220 Morzissey Boulevard 15 State Street - �� Hoston, Massachusetts 02125 Boston, M.assachusetts 02109-3572 � 617-727-8970 Federal Endangered Sp�cicn: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sezvice National Matine Fisheties Service . 22 Bridge Street Unit #1 One Blackburn Drive Coneord, New Hampshire 03301-4901 Gloucestei, Massachusetts 01930-2298 603-225-1411 . 508-261-9300 Massachusetta Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) : DEP Division of Wetlands and Wateruays � One Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 617-292-5695 Reqional DEP Of�icea: DEP-Western Region DEP-Southeast Region Wetlands Protection Program Wetlands Protection Piogram � 936 Dwight Streat 20 Riverside Drive, Route 105 Springfield, Massachusetts Oi103 Lakeville, Massachusetts 02347 413-784-1100 SC8-996-2800 DEP-Central Region DEP-Northeast Region Wetlands Pzotection Program Wetlands Protection Program 75 Giove Street 10 Commerce Way Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 508-792-7650 617-932-7600 National i7ild and Scenic Rivers 3ystem segments and study segments for Massachusetts as of June 2, 1992, include: Reat Branch o£ the Farmington River from Hayden Pond in Otis downstream to the confluence with Thorp Brook in Sandisfield; . Sudbury/Asaabet�Coacord Rivera as follows: the �Sudbu'ry ftom the Danforth Street bridge in Framingham downstream to the confluence s�ith the Assabet, the Assabet ftom 1000 feet belo�+ the Damon Mill Dam downstream to the confluence with the Sudbuzy, and the Concord from the confluence of the Sudbury and Assabet downstream to the Route 3 bridge in . Billerica; and the Aeatfi�ld Aiver as follows: East Bianch from the Cummington/Windsor, MA, town line downstream to O.B mile upstream of the confluence with Holly Brook, the Middle Btanch fiom the Peru/Worthington, MA, town line downstream to the con£luence with � Kinne Btook, and 0.4 mile of the Glendale Brook tributary from Clatk Wright Road bridge to the confluence with the Middle Btanch, and the West Btanch from the railroad bridge 2000 � feet downstream of Becket Village in Becket, MA, doomstream to the Chester/Huntington, MA, � town line. Projects located in theae a�gmenta, or within 0.25 �mile np- or �� do�ra-atraam, or 0.25 mile upstzeam oa any tributary, are ezeluded from the PGP . p. B January 1, 1995 � :i-':'- ;:=�?;: ��:�- Aii•"_ . . .... T✓''ifqiii'4'�"1'' �1 '' L !!C i.t� r y i iYikyjy y.. rr«Jryf��+F: - '-,.e � �C, n>�a'i i��tjµ�r��.n�`y " - 4 M :.;,., ... . .:,:.' r •. . ' `� c . .i� . • .:.; .-'.. .. ..� , . ...: . . . � -'i �. '•._. , r1x y.;i�` . . � , � . . . � . .. �.. � � . . � ' . '��1 .. . .. . - � . . � � . � � �.. . � . . . . . . . c�Jr 401 Water Quslity CertiPication: January 1, 1995 . �. ;�Y For work in Corps jurisdiction involving a discharge to waters of the �' I' II.S. , an individual 401 water .quality certification (WQC) must be obtained .< '' I from the Massachusetts DEP before work can proceed pursuant to this general � � permit for the following circumstances (pursuant to MGL c. 21 Sections 26 - _{�: 53 and regulations at 314 CMR 9.00, as supplemented by the Interim Gui.dance °�� effective 10/1/92) , until replaced by revised regulations in early 1995: ''�: -:::: 1. proposed work that is not subject to the WPA (310 C2�t 10.00) but does -- require a 401 Water Quality Certification and proposes the loss of bordering veqetated wetlands, land under water, or federal non-state wetland (e. g_ , WPA exemptions) ; 2 . any project intended to create a real estate subdivision for which a Notice of Intent is submitted on or after October 1, 1992; 3 . any project which will result in the loss of more than 5, 000 square feet of bordering. ve�etated wetlands or land under water; 4 . proposed work in Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs) as designated in 314 Ch+R 4 .00; 5 , proposed work in coastal areas which will result in the loss oi any amount of salt marsh; :6_ projects involving dredgina mor2 than 100 cubic yards in navigable waters_ �s Januar 1 1995 i.'r.�F p. 9 y . %,�:.;c =,� - ,.�"�:.._ L�L' 11V11 .1Viv vi `IL�.LL`/V1\iV✓ ...__.. .. .. ........................................................................ ....... � ._.......... ...._........... . .... CATEGORY I CATEGORY II INDIVID A __ .... . . _ t ..... ........................... .......................... AINLAND . WATERS. AN� WEMl1�NDS (WATERS OF US I?.I I '� ....... ........ . � .......................................................................... ' (a�, NEW.FILLIEXCAVATION L�ss than 5000.s_f .Inland waterway � 5000 s.f... to.l..acre..inland waterway , ;Greater than 1._acre..lnland..watenvay DISCHARGES; ..... aiid/or welland.fill and secondary,.__ tand/or weUand fill and,.secondary. or wetland fill and secondary _. _._.. _.. unpads �e �..,.,areas dralned, Iloodad or „�Impacls (e,g.,.,areas dralned,.flooded or ,.Impacts (ep ,areas,drained,,flooded_or c Ieared�..lmpad area Includes all 'cleared) ...impact area Includes all, cleared) .,.Im act area.Inc udes.,all ,,. _.... _ _ � .. P ... _._.... _ ... h�mporary. and.,,permanent Idl .and , 'temporary and.permanenl fill.and ,,tempora.ry_and permanent i,..,an. .,...,._._. cxcavaUon dischar�es .. ��axcayation dischar�es . �excayation.discha�ges._,, , ,. _. ... ..... __. _ ....... ihis.category excludes dams .dikes �. Any dam,, dike water diversion or ,, water diversions...water withdrawals water. withdrawal proJect. . _..,,. EIS requ�red by the.Corps... _. _ .. __..__._._.. _... ' - In-stream„work limded to July. 1.5 - Tlme oi ear .restriclion...to be _ ,..... , _ . , Y.. .: - -- delermined case by•case ., ..,,,. Oct t ,, . , .. ..... . ......... .... _ � _ (b) BANK STABILI7ATION.... Inland.bank stabllization.less lhan„_ Inland bank stabil¢atwn greater lhan � ,., _ . „ PROJECTS: 5G0 ft lengfh,and less than 1 c.y.,.,fill 500 ff .length..and/or greater than _ „ . - � r linear foot, below ordinary hl�h 1 .c y hll per, linear fool or any.. _ .._ _.. water ,provided no wetland hil ,,�amount with 611 In wellands. _.... . ... .. ......... .. v (c) RFPAIR.ANO MAINTENANCE Repalr/maintenance .of existing ,..., �i Replacement of non seryiceable fill Replacement, ol.non-serylceable.,lill,.... . OFAUTHORIZEDFILLS; currently sen!Iceable..,author¢ed.,hlls,��or,.repalrlmainlenance of sery�ceable o� repairlmalntenance. ol aerviceable �, ___. . . . . o v+flh.no exPansion or change in..use. „fll,,.with expansion.of .any.amount up to ;fill greater_thaq 1 .acre......... .. . ... .. . _._ ....,... , _ 1_�cre ar.wilh change, in.use .... ,.,...... . _._ ; , ....... .. . . . B TIDAL WATERS AND NAVIGABLE WATERS (2) . , .. ...................... . ....... (a) FILL Fdls authonzr.d by Ch 91 amnesty Up to 1 acre watenvay fill and/or Greater than J..acre,waterway_till...,.._,,, �,rogram (e,g;,,,seawalls,,, bulkheads) secondary_waterway and wetland _and/or secondary wate�way„or., ,,,., . . _. .. , , Impacts.{e.g:.,, areas dreined. or.. , wetland..impacts..(e:g,., areas._dremed or _.. __...__. ___... � ,, tJo Provistons for, new fill m Cat I. �.Aooded), Fill..includes.lemporary and �Ilooded). Fdl Includes,tempo�ary,an..,_,.. _ ........ _. . _.... _. _ _. ,.:permanent..waterway .hll _......, ;.permanent,_waterway ,fill ,,, ... . ,_.. _ .._... . , � .. .. ... ................................................. .... _., _.. ' " Temporery .salt. mersh,fli or excavahon;Temporary...salt,,,marsh..fill.,or„_excayatlo, _.. _ __.. _... � ��dischargea up to 1 acre . ..._,...,. „ �,d�schar�es �reate�..than 1 acre„ _,,,,,, _.. . . _ _..... ... . ....... . ........................................... . H - No, provlsions for permanent salt ;Permanent salt marsh.,flll,,,any..amount,_ _.... _.. � __...._ .......... ..._. . .,...__.... mareh fill In.PGP. ;...... ... . .... ... ...... ......... ... . .. . __. _ __ _ .._..... . ., ,._..._...... .... ....... _._ __ n, ;.EIS required ..Y..� e...��Pg.•....... ...................... �� ...... . � _..,. . _ .. .. _ N . ....... . ... . ... . . . . . .�;. .................................................................................... W . ... ... .. . . .. . ... _.. ..... . ...i i .... ... . . . .. � P � y .I Replacement of nan-seniceable,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,o (b) REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE,Re au/malntenance ol exlsUn ;Replacement of an ,non-servlceable. . ..�. ... `" WO.RK',. currently seryiceable..,authonzed ��atructure.or..fill or ,repairlmafntenanc��structure,,,or ,fill,,,or.:repairlmalntenanc � .... alructures_and.lills,..includiny amnesly ��oJ.a.serviceable slrucWre..or,.hll_w{th..._ �_of serylceable st(uctufe of„fll,,,,wit,..,,,,,,_ " ' ,approved..flls, with. no expansion,or (�expanslon.or,change in use_.(fll..limits 1;,fill replacement,or expansion„greater ,,,, ; """' •:acre for re lacemant and/or ex anslon .ithan 1 acre. �-'� i change in use. � , � , � . , K rh':o x �,, �'�^rt r ih.. y � �� ,��^p�,, V �� 7c:y . ., . ... . - � � . � . � " +�YiS'! . . . ��(��Sp �y:g�; : � l ,.�" �t �. . .. -- CATEGORY I ;CATEGORY II €:INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ;...................................................................... .......................,.......................:...................................................................;............................................................................................_ . . c DREDGING: � Malntenance dred,ging_less._than 1,000.,,,.�.�Malntenance_dredging,_greater than...............jMalntenance dredgln,g,.,(any,,,amount�.,ln..,.., . � � . ._............ ... ..._. ., , .. . ...... ........ .. . . c.y,,with„upland..disposal proylded .. „1 000 cy. or that does.not._meet the ,or._a(fecting..a.speclal.aquatic,_site (3) ,, proper,_siltation conlrols are. used, , �terms ln Cat I upland disposal_or , or,vnlh open water disposal P ... . limited to„dred�ln� and dis osal .... .,._ ��beach nourishmenl requlred_..and no, ,_,,,_ ,. ..... operatlons conducted between Nov 1 Impacts to special aquatic s�les (31 _. __..._.,.. and Jan.. 15; with no Impact to speclal ::See (a) above .for limitatlons on lill for , ,., „ _. aquatic sltes (3) beach nourlshment .... . .... .... _..._. ... . ............ .. .......... . .... .... ................. ............. ... _._ . . _..__, __ ..... _ _... .... _ New dred�ing up to 10,000 c y upland �New dredging greater,than„10�000 c.y _ _ __... . _ ....... _.._ _ disPosal.or beach nourishment re.quued or,_of any amount.in or affeclm�_a. ,,.. -- See (a) above for limi)allons on,_fill for ,speaal. aquatic.slte..(3),,or with._open., „ , ____ _.._ _ . _ , beach nourishment water disposa ..., ., .,. . ........ .... .... __ _ _ .__ _. . .__ ,. . _ . . __... _ ........._ _ _ __. _ _.. _. . .. .. . ............. .. .......... _ I (d) MOORINGS Pnyate ., non commercial. _non renlal , Moorings thal do not meet the terms in Moorings..within_the...horizontal,Ilmits,... I _. . .. _ _ sin�le ,boat moorin�s.no1 associated with Cat .l and moonngs that meet the or.with moored vesseis„that extend ., �an�,.,boatln� Iacility .�4Z .provided.not �terms.of.Cat. .t.that are_located.within �within_the,llmits,,ol Corpa.Federal. ,..... ,� locat.ed. In..Federal Nawgation Project a Federal anchorage ___,.._„ ., Naw�atlon, project, excepl.,those„In.,.... .: __... , ; ;; Federel anchora�es.under,Cat II ; � ... . ... , . . . .. .. ... ................... ...... ...... ... ......... . . .. .... (e) PILE-SUPPORTED. . ,Pnvate,. botlom-anchored Iloats up lo Pnvate piers and floats thal do not, Any..structure, pier..or,_float,,,that..,......._,.. STRUCTURES AND FLOATS; , 400 s f. ln s¢e and meel the terms,in Cat ,I„.. _„ , extends or wilh docked or moored I Pnvale .,ptle.suppoAed piers for . vessels that. extend withfn the ,.,,,, I nayigational.,access to the watenvay,. ��Expanslons to exisUnc� boa4ng �honzontal,limits,ol.,a Corps Federal , �up to. 1.,000.s1 in._s¢e with altached lacilities ,4). ,,, „ ........... . ..Navigatioq_Profect ,.,,,,.. , ' � Ooats up l0 200 s f (total.� ............. ... _ ti., � _ Structures fncluding.,piers„and„1loats,,.,,, �, , Provided , . __ ,associated w.h a n w o� pYevlously �� e _. . � floals..are supPorted oH,_lhe subslrate ,; _ . unauthorized,.boaHng_facllit ._(4�,,,, ,,,,,,,,, J.....a�...low tide� ...... . . ....... __. ,......... _._ _ _ .. _............ .. __. .. ......... ........ . ' _.... . struclures.and moored vessels are _ _. ..._ _ . ............... . _ not...P..ositioned over..vegetated ._..... ....... ___ _ _.. .... ........._..... ,.. ,.._..... ._ _ . _.__ ................. shallows (5) or,salt,marsh... _._... ............................. . ... . .... - Ch..91, license has been issued (for „ , _.,,. _ _ .............. ................ pile-supported structures only� ....._ �; _ _ . _ _ .. _ . . . .............................. �. not,.assoclated with,.a boa4ng.lacililY . __ _... __ ._. . . . ........................................... , � �4�� __ _ ......... ... ............................ ` .... _.. ... _ , not.located wlthin 3.,times.the, depth... ;; ._... . .. ..._... __ _. _. _ ..... .................... .................... ,, _._ _..... ..... of a Corps Federal.Navigatlon.ProJecl. _.... ..... ....... .......................................... _.. .. .. . � ............. ................ ........ . ....... ..... .... . �� ......... . . .......... ............ �Plers and structures Ilcensed..bY.Ch.. 91 ....... . . .........:........... . _ .. . . .; . ...._. , . ... ... . . . �:�r . ...._.. . ...... through the amnesty program. ''4`,� �� ,&i:. , '�l� �' 1'�,:, , . .. . . � :. �r > .i1�t'4. k � ��. . ------ . ._.. . CATEGORY I ':;CATEGORY II INDIVIDUAL PERMIT � ,........ . ....._. _.._... __ .. ...... ................. ......... ........... ...... .... (Q MISCELLANEOUS ,._..,,,..... , , Tem.Porary„buoys, markers, floals,, , ,;,Structures.or.wo�k i,n,.,or allec(ing . . ;,EIS.requlred lSy.the..Corps.......... ....... .,,. .. and simliar structures for recreational itidal and navigable waters thal are , „ ,,, ,.. _, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „ _...... ..... . . . . use durtn� speafic events provided not defined under.any ol the headings „Structures or wo�k w(thln the _..... .. ... ........ . . __ ' lhey are removed_withln .30 days afler ,�Ilsled above. Includes, but Is not limrfed horizontal Ilmits of.Corps.,Federal. „_. .. .. the,use has been discontinued ,.�to, utility .lines aenal transmission . ..,,navlgallon proJeds�.or..vnth doeked or,.. _,... ___.. _. _ . ... , __.. Ilnes plpelines outfalls, boat ramps moored vessels lhat extend with(n _. Coast Guard approved aids to bridges etc._ ihose Ilmds Does not.,include wihly. „ I navigauon.,,_.,..., lines aerlal,_ and,subsurface crossings.. _.... _ _ .. ��Shellfish aquaculture (acilitie ,refer fall into Cat. II ,. _ _. .... _.... _...... _. _. Oil spill.clean-up temporary strucWres �o limitations o( Corps. AquacWWre , _. and lill Letter of Permission dated Sep 1 _ _ __. . _ _ . __ ..... . _ ., . . _ ; 1991, lor guidelines.. _ _ _ _....... ... ....... _ � . . __... _... __. .. Fish and wildL',e harvesting sUuclures _ _......_ . .. ... _ , ..__ _ . .. and lill. �:...... _. __ _ _. , _.._.... _._._ ___. __. .. , ..__. _ _ _ _,,._.. ..._ _ _ ......... .... ._......, .. ...__...... ........_ .... __ _. ;...... __._ .._.... .. . ......... .. ....__......,.. .... ' Scienlific measur�menl devices and I : _ _. . _. _ _.. _ _ ... _ _ ... survey activities such as explora�ory _. _... . . . .. . _ ._ dnlling ,surveying and .samplin9....... _. __ _ _. b activities. Does not inGude oil and as _ .......... . ___. . _ _ _ _ _.. __._ _..... _ 9 � exploretion and hll lor roads or _ .. __... _._. N ___ ... _ . construction pads _ _ Footnates _ _. _ _ 1 Waters ol the U S in inland areas Inland nvers streams lakes ponds, and wethnds ,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,_ �, 2 Navigable Waters..waters that are sub�ect.to the ebb and flow of.the tide and.Federally designated navigable rrvers (the Merrimack .. ._ ', River._Connecticut Rrver, and Charles Rwer to the WateAown„Dam m Massachusetts) __,,,,,.,,,,_............. 3 , .,Special_AquaUc Sites. . lnclude wetlands and salt, marsh mudllats and vegetated shallows (see (5) below) ' 4 .. Boalinp Facllltles . Facllilies that.,provide _rent or sell moonng„space, such..as marinas, yachl clubs boat clubs „ ,. _. .. _ . boal,yards�..town tacllitles dockominwms,...etc , ... . _. _ ...... . ....................... ........ 5, ,Vegetated_Shallows Subtidal areas that support.rooted aquatic vegetation, such as eelgrass. „ „ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _.............. _....... __.._,... . . ........ ... ._....... ._ _ _ , ...... ............................ ..........._....... ... ......... , ; � ,.�;�i'. ......._ _.... ._._........ . ..._......_. .;._._....... ,..__...... _.........._.... . ._ _........ .�..:......... ._.....__. ..._.....,. . .__ . ._.. ... . .,...._.. . .._........... . . ............... ... . .................... ..._ _....._....... ., . , , . �� ...... ........... i�......... _.._..... . ..._ .. ... ........... ... .. i...... ... .. ............ .. ,......... �.� �_........... . ..__.__ _... , . .............._.. ............... . .. , ......... .. ................... � ..__ .__..._ . . . . ............... .. _.. :..._.... _......__.._ .. ......__. ............._. .. .,....... . . . .....,... . .. . ........................................... :�� I . ....... . . .... ......... ......_. ....... __. ... ..._._._ . . .'......... .............._ _..__.._ ........_..... . ...... . . .......'... . ............ ................. ................ ' .,� �I , ...._.. .. . ....... . . _.......... . ..;............ . ..........___ _............ ._. __..._ . ..�<.......... ............... .... . ._.... .__..... .... .. .j....... ............... . . ......... .. .............................. � ii: ................ .. .. . . . . . . , � . � � r:.. :��.' 11 f f .� ��r 1' r i��n �xldi't:�61n,�, ,, � "Fd;1'�'p��g�&&` r . .. . . - 1 'W�,i. �<r� ' _ ., ' . _ ' .. , l.:_35+� Federai Navigation Projects in Massachusetts - I ::� � .,�� , � � ��. I - Merrimack River �=--F»�_s-'"' NEW HAMPSHIRE � �} � Newburyport Harbor - ] Ipswich River _ _ � Essex River f —Sandy Bay ockport Harbor 8 Pigeon Cove Gloucester Hariwr and Annisquam River Island End River __geveriy Harbor A:!,,,-c Malden River � Salem Haroor o��„ Mystic River � Lynn Harbor ( MASSACHUSETTS �--Winthrop Harbor DOSTON jBoston Harbor Dorchester Bay and Neponsat Rivzr , � Cohasset Harbor ?rovince�own Weymouth Fore Weymouth \Hinghzm Hamor r,G�-0r & Town Rivers Back Rivar Scituate Hamor j � � Wellfleet Duxbury Harbor �Green Haroor Harbor Kingston Harbor - — —1 P!ymouth Haroor � � Pleasant � Buttermilk Bay Bay \ Cape Cod Canal / � Warenam Harbor �,., ( Cepe Cod b : \ Ne�� Bedford & �v,. � Fairhaven Harbor c� Taunton River �' Fall River Harbor Sesuit Harbor Stage Harbor Red Brook Harbor ` f /RHODE r�o y � ,� Andrews River e` I t� Hyannis Harbor / ISLAND 6,;° Falmouih Harbor �\ �v ---�_ Pollock Rip �_Little Harbor Woods Hole Harbor Shoals � � Lagoon Pond�Cross Rip Shoals WestpoR River Martha's ° � / Vineyard Cuttyhunk Harbor Nantucket Harbor Canapitsit Channel/ EdgaRown Harbor � Vineyard Haven Harbor / Menemsha Creek Nantucket cixA isi:�,:,i s�,�,,:.i ;rf. �. I '\ 310 ClIIt 10.49 � RECEIVED � � DH'PJe Na , M AY 2 6 1995 (lb bc p�widd 6�DP� Porm 3 • Salem Planning DePt• �ry�� Salem , . ,��„� Stop & Shop Supermarket c�aavealth . Depaz�tment of of Xassachaaetta Defenae • United Statea . Notice o! intent of Amertcg � IIaaer the Hassachusetta Wetlands Protaction Aot, G.L. c. 131, $40'.:: anQ Application for a Dapartment of tha Army Permit Part Is Ceneral iaformation � . . l. LOCBtlOII: StLeet addresa RnGtnn SYraP* ��a�om� M^acarhncarrc _nA __ Howley Street, Peabody,�Massachusetts Lot Numbez Ma� lFi�jnt 47Q � . 2. rroject: Type Co�ercial pescription Construction of supermarket. parking and loading facilities , landscapinR and underQround utilities . 3. Registry: county Fc�aY ��th - See Attachm_:r e ceztificate (if Registere3 Land) 4. applican_ The Stov & Shop Sunermarket Comnanv Inc. and _XxetB._ John C. Jeffers _ address c/o Serafini, Serafini and Darlin —. 63 Fe�eelA��acPli�hente�p�,klA 01970 (508) 744TOi12 5. Property ocaner � . Addreas 5. xepresentative �tty. John R . Serafini . Tel.(508)744-0212 xddress Serafini Serafini & Darling 63 F d a� �t_ , SalPm, MA n147n 7. a. Aave the Conaervation Commiasion and t6e Department's xegional office each • been eent; by certified mail or hand deliver, 2 copiee of completed Notice of . Intent, vith supporting plane and documenta? Yea � No ❑ b. eas the fee been eubmitted7 Yes � No ❑ c. Total Filing Fee Submitted $525 . 00 d. City/Tovn Share of Filing Fee $2�5 .00 State Share of Filing Fee $250.00 (sent to City/7am) (SS of fee in extess of 525, sent to OEP) -e. Za a brief statement attached indicating how the applicant calculated the : ��. f¢e7 � Yes ❑ No 3-1 effective 11/20/92 ATTACHMENT A OWNER: ADVANTAGE BANK 25 Bartlett Road, Winthrop, MA OWNER: JOHN C. JEFFERS 164 Boston Street, Salem, MA OWNER: Margaret M. Buckley 1212 Ocean Boulevard, Rye, NH �-- -..�� - .ING FEE CALCLTI.ATION WORKSI�E'P Pia„ca, roea�.eye/art�n.a�re eror e�b,ieoc co �to cnR . � � � � . 30.53(3e) SH0.lL�N0T 8E SUB]ECT� TO AOOITIONA� FEES � _CORY 1 S55 PER ACTIVITY s. No. lf said�ec'tivitiea are ttviered under�a SIHCLE NOI � � C. Coastruction of EACH ROADMAY/DRIVEMAY within the Exiating Fbuse/teeidentiel lot (addition� deck� _ _ Buffer zane or Coeetel Floodzane NOT reviewable — gerege�pool� ehed�or ORIVEMAY) . � � under 310 q1R 10.57 (`3e) end NOT .easocieted wlth e SFH Site Pceperetio� (removal of vegetetian� ezce- _ _ D. HAZIIROOUS MASTE CIEANUP (ezcept ea noted Sn � vetton greAing where home co�struction feo t category 4) — —' propoaed under thie NOI) � � Control of nuiee�ce vegetetion by rewoval, herb- _ _ TOTAL CATECORY 3 AC7IYITIES _ _ icidea, etc. within a Reaoucce �Area PER LOT pursuant to 310 CMR 10.53(4) � CATECORY 4 5725 PER ACTIVITY Reeouece Aree Improvement purauent to S10 CNR _ _ p, EACH �METLAND flllINC/CROSSING IIMITED Pft0]ECT 10.53 (4) o[her [hen 1C ebove . , � ACCESS ROADNAY/ORIVENAY under 310 CHR 10.53 (3e) — , � � associeted with COMIERCIAI� INDUSTRIAL� INSTITU- SEPi1C SYSTEMS or�eny part tnereof/repeira, _ _ TIONqI DEVELOPMENT OR RESIDENTIAL SUBOIVISION teplecement� UPGRAOINC � CONSTRUCTION. (•see category 2q for SFH driveweys•) Monito[iog Melle/well - __ B. flood Control Stcuctores (constructian� REPAIR, "AL CATECORY 1 ACTIVITIES i � � end/or modificetian) — — . Iti:+-: RSc.e::1�Ue[�l�cy.%� G�1�•o� �cc��tCk . -- C..LANDFILLS-publie h privete i (EGORY 2 5250 PCR ACTIVITY �. SAND h GRAVEI OPERRTIONS _ _ E0.CH NEM si�gle femily house (SfN) iNCL1AINC _ _ E. NEM rellroed linea or E%TENSIONS of E%ISTINC aite preparetian, retention/detention besias, lines � — — utilitiea, SEPTIC SYSTEM� roedwey/drivewey�other � -� \ then those purauent to 310 CMR 10.53(Se) �,,Y�,� Control of NUISANCE VECEfATION. under 310CMR� if revieWed under e SINGLE NOI -� 10.53(4) ather then on e SFM lot — Perking lot/ ANY size _ _ G. BRIOGES (rnnatructio�� reconetruction, expe�sion�_ _ � � � meintenence) ASSOCIATEO with e SFH lot - Beach Nourishment � _ �_� � CT� . Reising �or lo�.ering MATER LEYELS, . Coestel Activitiea purauent to 330 CMR 10.24 � � Z - -- — � (7e-c) including 7e-Electric Generetion Fecllitiee�. . I. ILLTERATION Of RESOURCE AREA d diveraion of weter 7b-Public Utilities, 7c-Coestal Limtted ProJecta � eseocieted �ith HAZAROOUS NASTE CLEANUP, ror� includi�g NEPAIR/NAINTENANCE of E%ISiINC piece� eoaquito co�trol proJecte� ar for ANY OTHER PURPOSE buildlnqa culverte, etc. NOT E7fPRE55lY IDENTIFIED ElSENnERE IH TNIS fEE SCH£WLE IIMITEO PftOJCCT ACiIVlTIES pursuent to 310 CMR - _ J, OREDG(NG�ACTLVITIES not aesocleted .ith e NEM 10.53 (e-d) AND 310 CMR 10.53 (f-1) per footptint — �,��, dock, pier or other ettucture dceceibed Sn cetegorp 5 �NE�^ ' �. __,i" _ '_`"`��C�}. � � 9 �� — — TOTAL CATECORY 4 ACTIVITIES __ EACH METLAND ORIVEMAY CROSSING"eesocieted with � e SFH purauant to 710 CMR 10.53(3e) CATECORY 5 S2 PER LINERR FOOT; TOTAL FEET N0T TO BE LE55 ' � THAN S50 NOR MORE THAN 51000 . ANY point source dischnrge _ _ A. Constructio�, reconstruction, REPAIR, ar replece-_ _ . ANY OTHER ACTIV1iY not describeG in Cetegorie9 _ ment Of DOCKS, PIERS, NEVETMENTS, OIKES, or other � 1,3,4 h S � enqineering atructures on COASTAL or INLAND ftESOURCE tTAL CATEGORY 2 ACT[VITIES AREAS including the plecement of RIP-RAP or other �N,�� e � .�";vi��. U:�C; �� C�:r� `�F� - - meteriel on coestel or inlend resource areea �"'��`' �'""�� rn �`'F�7`"1 H TOTAL CATEGORY 5 ACTIVITIES �TECORY 3 5525 PEfl ACTIVITY — — . SITE PftEPANATION for ANY developmrnt other then TO.IAl. FILINC FEE BALCUlATEO . s SZS .00 foC e SFB INCLUOING removel af veyetetio�, . pERSON-CACLULRiINC fEE SCHEDUI{ (Print Heme) excevation h gredinq .rhen ectuel cooeEruction le pgill F. 50111m2I' C�O Sommer Env. Tech. rnc. NOT-propoaed under this .NOI � . - . CDnSTRUCTION Of EACH BUIIDING withln.commerciel, 525 . 1 �RE55 65 New Salem St. . Wdk2fleld, MA �788� . � ind�striel, ins[ituttonel; or epertment/con0o/ TEIEPHONE M1M�R �61�� 246-5360 . [o.+nhuase type of developnent, ANY PART of whlch � , � is in a BUFFER ZONC or RESOUftCE AREA. Aseocleted SICNATURC ��-✓��U/��i.��vv�.i' oFrE � � %S ectivities: eit< preperetloo reten[So�/detention i bnaln canstructla�,eeptic eyeteme, per4ing lote, utllities, polnt eource diaChergee, ee..areqe treetmeni .. � � . . _ , . �i � ��. .'-I,�r�c1`_ � . . T �,.'.� ��c_ �C��_., � .�.:LL,� ? , 8. Ha�e n�l obtainablo permit.:, vnziancee end eppro�nl� requirod by .local by-law baen�cbtnineYQH ❑ No � obCained Appliad zor: Not Applled For: Zonin� Variance-Peabody We[lands Special PermitSite Plan Reviaw - Peabodv PUD Special Permit Ordez o€ Conditions-Peabady 9. Ia aay portioa o£ LAe site eubjeet to e Metlanda $eatrict�$n ozdec puzauant to c.L_ c_ 131, SdoA or G.L. c. 130, 51057 Yoe L.I No e+ � • 10- Liet all plane aad eupportirig dxumente aubmitted vith thie �otice of Zntent. Identifying - pumher/Lettet Tltle, Date A List of Ocmers B Pzolect De5cTipLion - C Environmental Impact StaCement D Draina e Calculations B Volume Galculations F Resousce .Azea Descri tion G Aabitat Evaluation H Mitikation Meastues T Site Plans J Cross Section Plans & resoureAxea lleCail Plans K ^ � Peabody OrdeY oF Conditions L Locus Map 11. Cheek those resource areas �+ithin �hxch vork is proposed: �a) � SuffaY Zone � (b) Inlaf+d: � Q$ Haqk* Laad Subject to Floodinq � ❑ Sordaring Vegetated HeCland* '�' Bosdering � Land vnder Water Body s uatervay• ❑ zsolated (c) coasial: ❑ Land vnder the ocean* ❑ Des.ignated Port Area• ❑ coastal Seach� � coascal Dune � Harrier eeachR ❑ Coastal Eank ❑ Rocky Zntertidal shore+ ❑ 5alt nazs�� ❑ Land under salt Qond+ ❑ Land containing shellfiehx � ❑ Fish xun� . . +Likely to involva tr.s_ Army Corps of En9ineers concurrent juri�diction. see General Instrvcciona for completinq Notice of Zntent. 3_2 , 12. l�s tY.e proje�t within eei:i.mate.i habitat ahich ia indicated on the most recent Eetimated Habitat tiap of state-Lieted Rare wetlanda wildlife (if any) publiehed by the Natural Aeritaqe and Endangered Species Proqram? NOSMAP AVAILABLE � � Date print January 1995/1996 d Habitat xap � _ [ j (if any) Zf yea, have you aent a copy of the Notice of intent to the Natural eeritage and Endanqered speciee Program via the U.s. Poetal Service by certified or priority mail (or otherwiea eant it in a manner that guaranteea delivery vithin two daye) no later than the date of the filinq of this Notice of intent with the coneervation commiesion and the DEP reqional office? YES [ J NO [ ] - if yee pleaee attach evidence of timely mailing or other delivery to the Natural eeritage and Endangered speciee Program. Part I2s Sita Description Indicate ahich of the following information has been provided (on a plan, in . narrative deacription or ,calculationa) to clearly, completely and accurately - describe existinq eite conditions. Identifying Number/Letter ' . . � (of plan, narrative � or calculations) � Natural Features Soils F Vegetation I , � _ Topogrzpl:y . Open water bodies(inc3uding ponds and lakes) � I Flowing water bodies(including atreams and rivers) Public and private aurface water and ground water supplies . on or within 100 feet of site � , xaximum annual ground water elevations with datea and location of teat F�j Boundaries of reeource areas checked under Part l item 11 •t above � B.� other � � � � Man-made Features: I structurea (such as buildings, piers, towers and headwalls) I Orainage and flood control Pacilities at the aite and i�ediately off the aite, including culverts and open channels (with inverte), dams and dikes subsurface aewage dieposal eystems I Underground utilities . 3-3 I Roa3ways and parkinq areas _I __ pr�,p�rty houoarr�ev, sas•::•�nC� and ri�hts-of-��y B�� Other Part III: Nork Description - Zndicate which of the following information hae been provided (on a plan, in • narrative deecription or calculationa) to clearly, completely and accurately deecribe work propoeed within each of the reaource areas checked in Part I, item 11 above. - Identifying Number/r.etter (of plan, narrative or calculatione) Planview and Croea Section of: B,I,J Structuree(such ae buildinga, piera, towere and headwalls) . B,C,D,E,I Drainage and flood control facilities, including culverta and open channels(with inverte), dams and dikes C�D�I subsurface aewage diaposal systems & underground utilities B,E�I,J Filling, dredging and excavating, indicating volume and composition of material B,E,I,J Compensatory etorage areas, where required in accordance with Part ii2, section 10.57(4) of the regulations. _ ____ Wildlife habita� restozatiur. �r ret.:iicaticn areas Other Point Source Discharqe . Description of characteristics of discharge from point . source (both closed� and open channel) , when point of diacharge falle vithin reaource area checked under Part Z, item 11 above, as aupported by atandard engineering calculations, data and plans, including but not limited to the following: 1. Oelineation of the dreinege area contributirg to the point of discharge; 2. Pre-aM post•developrent peek run-off fran the drainege area, at the point of discheree, for.at teast the 10-year ard 100-year frequency storm; . 3. Pre- and post-development rate of infiltration cmtributirg to the resource area checked uder Pert t, item 11 above; � � 4. Estimeted water quelity characteristics of pre• ard post-development run-off et the�point of discharge. 3-4 � Par[ IY: Miti�etirg 7lcazures . ` . !. ilea �:�, a�.vl.xtely crd acc�re:ely dr.scr+'�e, W th refermce to stpporti� plans ard celeutetiau uhere r�ccessery: (e) All meesures ard desiyne propoaed to weet the perfo�menee etardards set forth vder each , � resource aree specified in Pert I1 or Part III of the repulatioru; or � (b) Yhy the presuiptiors eet forth vder esch resource e�ee specified in Vart II or Part !11 of the reguletims do rat apply. O Coastal Reeource Area Type: identifying number:or � � inland B8nk letter of support documents Construction of a 15 foot +/- wide box culvert for stormwater discharge. J � Coastal Resource Area Type: identifying number or � inland Bordering Land Subject to Flooding letter of support: - documents Incremental stroage volumes in the post-constructio condition will be equal to or greater than pre- E,H,I,J construction storage volumes. 3-5 � ❑ Coaetal Resource Area Type: "�denti.fying nvmber or . ❑ inland letter of support documenta � 2. Clearly, completely and eccuretely describe, with reference to supporti�g plans erd calculations where necessary: (a) all measures ard designs to regulate work within the euffer Zone so as to ensure that said work does not alter a� area spetified in Pert I, Section 70.02(1)(a) of these regutations; or (b) if work in the euffer 2one wilt atier such en area, ell measures a�d designs proposed to meet the perforrcance standards estblished fer ttc adjacenr ,-esource area; specified in Part .1 ar Pert Ili of these tegulatir�s. �j_ Coastal Reaource Area Type Sordered Identifying number or �t Inland By 100—Feet Diacretionary zone: letter of eupport documents Waterway Erosion control will be maintained throughout the construction phase to protect the North River from H,I siltation. Gas and oil separators wi.11 be maintained in the I storm drainage system to mitigate the potential for pollution. 3-6 Part V: Additional 2nformatioa for a Department of the�nrmp permit 1. COE AppliCation No. (to be provided by COE) � � 2. (Name of waterway) 3. Namea and addreaees of property ownere adjoining your property: 4. Document other project alternatives (i.e., other locationa and/or conetruction metfiods, particularly thoee that aould eliminate the diecharge of dredged or fill material into watere or wetlande) .: 5. 8y" x 11' drawings in planview and crosa-aection, showing the resource : area and the proposeh activity vithin the resource area. Drawinga must be to acale and ehould be clear enough for photocopying. certification is requized from the nivision of water Pollution control before. the Federal permit can be iasued. certification may be obtained by contacting the Divieion of Water Pollution Control, 1 Winter Street, Boaton,� Hassachusetta 02108. where the activity will take place within the area under the MassachUsetts """"" approved coastal Zone Hanagement Program, the applicant certifiea that his proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner� that is „onsistent with the approved proqi:in. Information provided will be used in evaluating the application for a permit and ia made a matter of public record throuqh isauance of a public notice. nisclosure of this information is voluntary; however, if necessary information is not provided, the application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. Z hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury that the foregoing� — Notice of Intent and accompanying plans, documenta and supporting data are _ . . true and complete, to the best of my knowledge. . � � THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY, INC. and JOHN C. JEFFERS � � Signature of Applicant Date ' bv �i`�lA'l/ IV- � /1,G(�� 7�-'� Mav 26, 1995 Sig ture of Applicant'e -epreaentative Date SOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. . FORM "Exception to ENG form 4345 epproved by HOUSACE, 6 Mey 1982" 11ID 700 (lEST) � ' 1 MAY 82 "7his dociment conteins a joint Department of [he Arnry end State of Massathusetts applicetion for a permit to obtain permission to perform ffice of Mana ement and activities in United Stetes waters. The 0 9 _ eudget(OMB) has approved those questions required by the US Arnry Carps of Engineers. OMB Ninber 0702-0036 ard ezpiration date of 30 Sepcenber 79&3 epplies". This statement uill be set in b po�nt type. 3-7 � ,. NOTICE OF INTENT FEE TRANSHITTAL FORN DEYARTHENT OF ENVZRUNHENTAL PROTECTZON - � DNISION OF WETI.ANDS AND HATERWAYS � NOTZCE OF INTENT (NOZ) APPLICANT: PROPERTY OHNER: . � Name The Stop S Sho�Suuermarket Comnanv. Inc.Name SEE ATTACAMINT A • and John C. Jeffers � - street c/o John R. Serafini . Sr_ Street 63 Federal Street City/2ocm _ 4_9 A�'_ city/xown State PIA'r- Zip Code�197Q�_ state Zip Code Phone Number (508) 744-0212 • . PR0.TECT LOCATZON: StTCAt%LOt Number Bflston�rrPar � city/Town �1� DEP FILE NUMBER (if available) . . . NOI FZLZNG F£E DZSPUTED FEE . Total NOI Filing Fee: $ 525•� Total Diputed Fee: $ � (as deter.nined in ��tice of state share cf f_Air.e Fee: $ 2SO.00 __ Insc`._`icier.t Fee lette:: �r:.:.t (1/2 of fee ir. e:ccess �_ $25.07) c:r.�er:aciun cummissiuz.) . City/Town Share of state Share of Fee: $ Filing Fee: $ 2�5.00 {1/2 of total disputed fee) city/Town Share of Fee:S (1/2 0£ total disputed fee) INSTROCTIONS- 1. send this Fee Transmittal form and a check or money order, payable to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to the DEP Lock Box at: � Dept- of Environmental Protection � Box 4062 Boston, HA 02211 2. Attach a copY of this form to the Notice of Zntent submitted to the local Conservation commission- . � � � 3. Attach a cODV of this form and a coov of the DEP check to each of the - Notice of Intent forms submitted to the DEP regional office. 11/20/92 ATTACHMENT A OWNER: ADVANTAGE BANK 25 Bartlett Road, Winthrop, MA OWNER: JOHN C. JEFFERS 164 Boston Street, Salem, MA OWNER: Margaret M. Buckley 1212 ocean Boulevard, Rye, NH EXHIBIT � � , � ZA Engineers and � eoEnvironmental, Inc. sc:entrsu � � i �� GZ� � � � � � �� '� � '�� - � 0 � � ., aP � .4. n .�. .,.. _, � �._1� �a .+� 1 1 , I 1 ` , � ' ENV[RONMENTAL SITE EVALUATION FORMER TANNERY SITE � SALEM/PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS � � .. � • PREPARED FOR: Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. Quincy, Massachusetts ' ' PREPARED BY: , GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Newton Upper Fa11s, Massachusetts ' ' July 1993 File No. 1317210 � � Reissued/Revised 10/94 ' Copyright° 1993 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 1 I , ' GZA t„g;nee,s a„d GeoEnv�roumental,Inc. s�;e„usu 1 � � July 14, 1993 �� File No. 13172.10 ' Reissued/Revised 10/94 ' ,v� Mr. William O'Brien i _- 5er"" Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. -;5�: ;:� 1385 Hancock Street, lOth Floor � � Quincy, Massachusetts 02169 �20Needham5neet Re: EnVIIOriR1eC1LH1 $lt2 EV31L1HT10I1 �� ewton Upper Falls FOI'I11CC T'dIIII2Iy .Slt2 assachuseas02764 HOWICY 3lld l�BIR StI20tS 617-969-0050 � �nx 6n-9ss-��cs Salem/Peabody, Massachusetts Dear Mr. O'Brien: ' In accordance with our proposal dated February 1, 1993, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has conducted an environmental site evaluation of the above-referenced � site in Salem�Peabody, Massachusetts. The purpose of this assessment was to render � an opinion on the presence of hazardous materials or oil in the soil and groundwater at the site, within the meaning of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 21E. This ' report has been prepared in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set forth in Appendix A. ' This report describes the conditions observed by GZA at the study site. The text presents the results of a site reconnaissance, a local agency file review, a state and federal regulatory agency file review, and a subsurface exploration program including the chemical analysis of soil and groundwater samples from the site. [n conclusion, Subsidiary of GZA Q�E��;�o„me�„� the report provides an opinion regarding the presence of hazardous materials and oil Techmlogies,Inc. 1R [IlE $011 OL gI0l1RdW3I0I 8I IllO S1I0. 1 Previous work by others at the site indicated that the western portion of the site was occupied by leather tanneries for many years. Previous environmental studies at the ' site indicated that volatile organics, semi-volatile organics and petroleum hydrocarbons were present in the soil; and low levels of volatile organics were present in the groundwater at the site. These contaminants were the result of a leaking underground , storage tank (UST) and a former solvent pit which existed when the property was used as a tannery. Due to these results, a portion of the study site (9 Howley Street-the � � former tannery area) is currently identified on the Massachusetts DEP "List of Confirmed Disposal Sites and Locations To Be Investigated (LTBI)" as an LTBI with a current listing as "Phase I° (Site I.D. No. 3-3319). ' i - An Equal Op ormnie F.m lo er M/FNM ' P Y P Y ' � Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. July 14, 1993 File No. 1317210 Page 2 , ' The focus of GZA's subsurface program for the current study included exploration of the UST and solvent pit areas, the footprint area for the proposed new building, and �� for general site coverage. The field program consisted of the completion of 19 test ' pits, and the sampling of groundwater from over 20 locations, incl�ding 6 newly installed monitoring wells. ' Analysis of groundwater did not detect significant groundwater contamination by volatile organic compounds, petroleum hydrocarbon compounds or heavy metals which would require large scale groundwater treatment. Localized areas of groundwater ' contamination will likely be enco�ntered during the remova] of at least three, and possibly four, abandoned USTs. ' It is expected that the localized areas of soil contamination in the area of the UST's and solvent pit will be addressed during the removal activities. ' It should be noted that none of the areas of concern are within the proposed building footprint, and therefore would not be expected to impact construction activity, except possibly during the installation of utilities. ' Should you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call the project ' reviewer, Charles Crealese at (617) 630-6229. We appreciate this opportuniry to provide services to Stop & Shop. ' Very truly yours, GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1 � � �� M� � � �avid J. Adilman F-us�harles D. Crelease ' Project Hydrogeologist Consultant\Reviewer I � �°�� Charles A. Lindberg , Associate Principal DJA/CDC/CAL , Attachment: Report f/dmh�13173.1/13172.c1 � ' , i ' ' ' TABLE OF CONTENTS , Paee ' �� 1.00 INTRODUCTION 1 2.00 BACKGROUND 1 I2.10 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 ' 2.20 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE 2 2.30 SITE HISTORY 2 ' 2.40 PREVIOUS STUDIES � � 2.50 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 8 , 3.00 REGULATORY INFORMATION CONCERNING SITE AND VICINITY 8 ' 3.10 LOCAL 8 3.20 STATE 9 � 3.30 FEDERAL 10 , 4.00 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 11 4.10 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 1 I I , 4.20 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 13 ' S.00 FIELD EXPLORATION, SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROGRAM l3 ' S.10 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS 14 ' S.11 Groundwater Elevation Measurements 14 ' � , ' TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D) Ipa�e ' S.20 SOIL AND WATER SAMPLING 1� �C,7[� 5.30 CHEMICAL SCREENING OF SOIL AND , �u WATER SAMPLES 15 6.00 FIELD EXPLORATION AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS 16 � 6.10 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 16 ' 6.20 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL SCREEN[NG ANALYSES 17 6.21 Soil 18 � 6.22 Groundwater 18 ' 6.30 SUMMARY OF ANALYT[CAL RESULTS 1I 7.00 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 20 � 8.00 LIMITATIONS 22 ' REFERENCES � TABLES ' TABLE 1 OIL/HAZARDOUS MATER[AL RELEASES IN THE VICINITY OF 9, 19 AND 19 REAR HOWLEY STREET AND 164 BOSTON STREET ITABLE 2 REGULATED FACILITIES [N THE VICINITY OF 9, 19 AND 19 REAR HOWLEY STREET AND 164 BOSTON STREET ' TABLE 3 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA � TABLE 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SO[LS: (VOCs, PHC) • TABLE 5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SOILS: (SEMI-VOCs, PCBs) , TABLE 6 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SOILS: (METALS) � � ' , TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D) ' TABLE 7 ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUNDWATER (VOCs, PHC) TABLE 8 ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUNDWATER: (DISSOLVED ' METALS) ' �� TABLE 9 SCREENING RESULTS: GROUNDWATER pH AND SPECIFIC � CONDUCTANCE � FIGURES ' - FIGURE 1 LOCUS PLAN FIGURE 2 EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN ' FIGURE 3 GROUNDWATER CONTOUR PLAN ' APPENDICES ' APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS/TERMS & CONDITIONS OFENGAGEMENT ' APPENDIX B SANBORN HISTORICAL MAPS � APPENDIX C DEP [NFORMATION: EXCERPTS FROM DEP'S OCTOBER 1992 "LIST OF CONFIRMED DISPOSAL SITES AND LOCATIONS TO BE INVESTIGATED" , APPENDIX D TEST PIT AND BORING LOGS ' APPENDIX E CHEMICAL SCREENING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS APPENDIX F CONTRACT LABORATORY RESULTS � f/dmh/13172.1/131721.toc . ' , ' ' , , ' 1.00 INTRODUCT[ON ' In accordance with our proposal dated February 1, 1993, GZA GeoEmironmental, �� Inc. (GZA) has completed an environmental site evaluation of the 9, 19 and 19 Rear , Howley Street and 160 and 164 Boston Street site in Peabody and Salem, Massachusetts. The purpose of this evaluation was to render an opinion as to whether surficial or historical evidence indicates that hazardous material or oil is present in the � soil or groundwater at the site, within the meaning of Massachusetts General laws, Chapter 21E. The scope of services included: ' • a site visit; ' : a review of site history; a review of previous studies; �' � • contact with certain local and state officials, and review of certain state and federal files and lists regarding possible sources of environmental ' contamination at or near the subject site; � • a field exploration program consisting of test pits, borings with monitoring well ' installations, a groundwater elevation survey and chemical testing of soil and groundwater; and ' • the preparation of this report containing an opinion as to whether surficial or historical evidence indicates the presence of hazardous material or oil in the soil or groundwater at the site. ' This report has been prepared in accordance with the Limitations and Terms & Conditions of Engagement presented in Appendix A. 1 2.00 BACKGROUND , The following paragraphs describe the physical layout of the site, its hydrogeologic , setting, and th.e history of site use. � 1 � ' � � � 2.10 SITE DESCRIPTION ' The study site consists of fourteen existing buildings and the remains of several buildings which were destroyed in a fire in 1989, situated on approximately 6.43 acres of land located at 9, 19 and 19R Howley Street in Peabody, Massachusetts and l60 ' and 164 Boston Street, in Salem, Massachusetts. The Peabody/Salem town line crosses through the study site. A Site Locus and Exploration Locauon Plan are �� provided as Figures 1 and 2. At the time of this study, the site was occupied by , Larrabee and Hingston, manufacturers of woode� tanning drums and wooden tanks, the Jeffers Lumber Mill, two residences and the remains of the Flynn Tannery. A detailed description of the site is presented in Section 4.00. � To the north, the site is bounded by railroad tracks owned by the Boston and Maine Railroad and the North River Canal. To the west the site is bounded by Howley � Street beyond which is a gasoline service station and several other commercial properties. To the south the site is abutted by the Old North Burial Ground, and Boston Street. Beyond Boston Street are several commercial facilities including an ' automobile dealership, a machine shop, an auto body shop and a fuel oil distributor. To the east the site is abutted by residential properties. , 2.20 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE ' According to the U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangle map of the area (Salem, Massachusetts Quadrangle, 1979, the study site is located immediately south and topographically upgradient of the North River Canal which tlows eastward ro the ' North River which flows into Beverly Harbor. GZA anticipates that regional groundwater flow is generally to the north toward the North River Canal. A groundwater elevation survey conducted at the site during this evaluation confirmed ' this northerly direction of flow (See Section 6.10). However, localized flow directions in the vicinity of the site may vary as a result of underground utilities (e.g., storm drains, sewers, utility conduits) or heterogeneous subsurface conditions. ' Subsequent references to upgradient or downgradient directions in relation to the site are relative to GZA's measured northerly direction of goundwater flow. ' 2.30 SITE HISTORY '�, � To obtain information regarding the history of the site, GZA contacted the Peabody and Salem Assessor's Offices, Building Departments and the Peabody Public Library. Additionally, GZA requested historical atlases from the Sanborn Mapping and �' � Geographic Information Service (Sanborn) of Pelham, New York. Historical maps � 2 ' ' � � reviewed include those dated 1887, 1892, 1897, 1903, 1907, 1914, 192Q 1929, 19a9 and 1968. Excerpts from these Sanborn maps are contained in Appendix B. ' The maps show that the western portion of the site and most of the surrounding area � were historically occupied by tanneries and�or morocco factories dating back to� the ' 1800s. According to information obtained from the Peabody Public Library, moroccoing is a process of finishing leather, whereas tanning involves making leather �E,7�� from hides and skins. The leather finishing and tanning operations consist of both wet ' �u and dry processes. Usually the wet processes were performed on the first floor of the manufacturing buildings and dry processes were performed on the upper floors of the facility. � The eastern portion of the site was historically occupied by lumber companies which manufactured commercial vessels (tanks, drums and tubs) used in the leather industry ' from the early 1900s. The western portion of the site is located in the Town ot Peabody and the eastern portion in the Town of Salem, Massachusetts. � The 1887, 1892 and 1903 maps do not cover the eastern portion of the site in the town of Salem. Both portions of the site are covered on the remaining maps. Based on the information provided on the Sanborn historical maps, the site operations and � ' occupants are summarized below: ' 1887 Southwest portion - dwellings and a soap manufacturer • Northwest portion - C.L. Pierce Morocco Manufacturing, J. Buxton Inner Sole , . Manufacturing and S.S. Southwich Currier East portion - not covered , 1892 Southwest portion - no change since 1887 • Northwest portion - C.L. Pierce Morocco Manufacturing and two vac�nt , • buildings East portion - not covered ' 1897 , Southwest portion - no change since 1887 • Northwest portion - the T.H. O'Shea Morocco Factory and Joseph Crehore ' . Stiffening Shop East portion - not covered � � 3 ' ' � , 1903 • Southwest portion - no change since 1887 ' : Northwest portion - no change since 1897 East portion - the A.F. Clark Lumber Company Planing Mill and Lumber Yard ' 1907 Southwest corner - at the intersection of Boston Street (Main Street) and �� Grove Street (Howley Street) - Union Hand Laundry , • Northwest and eastern portions - no change since 1903 1914 � : Southwest corner - vacant All other areas of the site remained unchanged since 1903 � 1920 The map showed no changes to the site from the 1914 maps ' 1929 Southwest corner - a lacquer spray building located at the corner of Howley and Main Streets. t : Northwest portion - the Greiss Pfleiger Tanning Company, [nc. North portion - a settling basin in the area of the tanning company buildings ' • East portion - no change since 1903 1949 � Southwest portion - the Gale Leather Company Northwest portion - John Flynn and Sons, Inc. and an electric lamp warehouse building which was constructed on a right of way on the northwest portion of ' • the site North central portion - the Larrabee and Hingston Wood Works faciliry • East portion - J.D. Jeffers and Sons Lumber , 1968 • The map showed no changes to the site from the 1949 maps li i Information from the Peabody Assessor's Office indicates that the buildings on the western portion of the site were destroyed by a fire in 1989. Following the fire, , asbestos was removed from some of the buildings and they were subseyuently demolished. This is further discussed in Section 2.40. � , 4 ' ' , � Information on file with the Peabody Building Department indicates that Jeffers and Sons Lumber was on the site as early as 1934. � No additional historical information was provided by the Peabody or Salem municipal offices. � 2.40 PREVIOUS STUDIES , �� Several studies of portions of the site have been conducted by various consultancs. The following reports obtained from the client and DEP files, are summarized below: � 9 Howley Street The report entitled "Subsurface Hazardous Waste Investigation at Property of ' John Flynn and Sons, 9 Howley Street Peabody, Massachusetts 01960" and dated June 1986 was prepared by SP, Inc. of Salem, Massachusetts. According to the study "it [was] the desire of the owner to have the property assessed in order that the property ' may be sold". The scope of work included, the advancement of six soil borings, a site reconnaissance, and sampling and analysis of groundwater and soil. ' The site reconnaissance revealed the presence of a sump connected to a floor trench system in one of the buildings and a "solvent pit" located to the east of the on- , site buildings. According to the report, "the soil in the solvent pit evidenced a strong . odor and appearance of volatile organic contamination." The site plan did not specifically identify the location of the solvent pit or trench system. The report also , identified asbestos on the boiler and piping within the building. Conclusions stated in the report indicated that °none of the soil samples showed evidence of heary metal contamination; none of the site showed leachable quantities of hazardous materials; � and bigh quantities of Bromoform, 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether and 1,2-Dichloroethane were all detected in the groundwater samples in concentrations exceeding 100 parts per billion (ppb)." , 19 Howlev Street � A report entitled "Subsurface Hazardous Waste Investigation At Larrabee and Hingston 19 Howley Street Peabody, Massachusetts 01960" dated November 1987 was also prepared by SP, Inc. According to the study, "the building and surrounding �i , property (were] subjected to a comprehensive investigation to determine whether hazardous waste materials and/or oils have been released or contained or located on the site or in the soi] or groundwater." This property had been the location of a , woodworking shop since the 1940s. The investigation consisted of the advancement ■ 5 , ' ' , of 12 soil borings, a site reconnaissance, and groundwater and soil sampling and analyses. � The report concluded that "from interpretation of the analytical data and soil � profiles, it is concluded that the property can be certified free of hazardous material. , The results of Extraction Procedure Toxicity testing, PCBs and Pesticides, VOA and Oil and Grease Analysis confirm that the property has not been exposed to accidental �� or deliberate dischargers of hazardous materials and is free of contamination." ' 9 and 19 Howley Street The report entitled "Site Investigation Harrington Property 9 and 19 Howley �' Street Peabody, Massachusetts" and dated November 1, 1991 was prepared by Pine and Swallow Associates, Inc. (PSA). Portions of this report were not included in the 1 information provided to GZA for review. The scope of work conducted by PSA included a site reconnaissance, a site history review, a review of studies on surrounding properties, the excavation of eight test pits, the installation of nine groundwater ' monitoring wells, a groundwater flow survey and sampling of soil and groundwater for chemical analyses. PSA's site reconnaissance identified a 10,000-gallon aboveground tank, and fill pipes on the sides of Building 3 suggesting that underground storage '' tanks (USTs) may have been located beneath the slab floor. ' The report concluded that "file research and the evidence of analysis of soil and water samples from the site under assessment confirm the existence of low levels of contaminants within the tannery area and also the existence of low levels ot , contaminants within local groundwater." Excavation of eight test pits at selected areas on 9 and 19 Howley St revealed the presence of Stoddard Solvent, gasoline, oil and grease and VOCs in soils at the site. Groundwater samples from the site indicated the � presence of a number of VOCs, including chloroform at 43 ppb, bromodichloromethane at 16 ppb and tetrachloroethene and dibromochloromethane at below 6 ppb. Tl�e report also concluded that "groundwater across the site flows to I , the northeast and directly toward the North River Canal." Finally, the report "confirms that a release of oil and hazardous materials to the environment has occurred at this site." ' 9. 19, and 19 Rear Howlev Street ' The report entitled "Assessment of Subsurface Site Conditions Harrington Property 9, 19 and 19 Rear Howley Street Peabody, Massachusetts," dated February 6, 1992, was also prepared by PSA. � i6 1 1 � , The scope of work conducted by PSA included the excavation of 18 additional test pits at selected areas on the site, the completion of 7 microwells, installation of ' additional groundwater monitoring wells; sampling of ground and surface water, and field and laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater samples to determine the magnitude and extent of contamination. The North River Canal was also sampled at � two locations. Additionally, PSA conducted a review of files of ENPRO Services, Inc. of Newburyport, Massachusetts. ENPRO was called in to perform Emergency Response Procedures at the tannery property followi�g the 1989 fire. At the time of � �� the PSA study, asbestos removed after the fire was stored on site in two dumpsters.� ENPRO files confirmed the presence of a 13,000-gallon UST under the tloor � of Building No. 3, (the boiler room). PSA also identified the followi�g tanks on the . west side of the site: a UST of unknown capacity containing 1ow concentrations of gasoline or possibly Stoddard Solvent, an aboveground tank of unknown capacity ' containing Number 6 fuel oil; and a 1Q000-gallon aboveground tank which contained fuel oil; a UST containing a solid foam. ENPRO indicated that this tank was formerly used for fuel oil storage. � PSA concluded that "spills and leaks associated with underground and , aboveground storage tanks as well as with cement pits formerly utilized for waste chemical disposal by the tannery facility have resulted in contamination of adjacent soils. The primary contaminants of concern have been identified as Stoddard Solvent, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE) and phenols. Several polynuclear � aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs), and a number of other compounds �re of lesser concern. Significant soil contamination above the water table appears to be � localized in areal extent to four areas identified as TP-2, TP-3, TP-7 and TP-8. The VOC and PHC contamination at the site appears to be limited to the same area of concern." � In addition, an Interim Site Classification Form (ISCF) and Preliminary Assessment Report (PAR) were completed for the study site by identified as "Flynn � Tannery." The ISCF form had all eight criteria listed as "not met" indicating that the site should be characterized as a non-priority site. ' 164 Boston Street The report entitled "Level I Environmental Site Assessment Jeffers Lumber ' Company 164 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts" and dated December 28, 1992 was prepared by Certified Engineering and Testing Company, Inc. (CETCO). The purpose of this study was to assess the potential for the release of oil or hazardous materials , at the site and surrounding properties. , 7 ' ' � , CETCO's investigation consisted of a site inspection, background research, and a review of available records. In the report CETCO stated that their results "revealed � no evidence that the site has been subject to a reiease of petroleum products or hazardous materials." , 2.50 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS �� GZA reviewed a 1988 aerial photograph of the site which was on file with the � Peabody Community Development Office. The photograph shows several large structures on the western portion of the site prior to the fire. Additionally, the Jeffers Lumber Mill and Larrabee and Hi�gston facilities are also shown. � 3.00 REGULATORY INFORMATION CONCERNING SITE AND VICINITY ' Certain state and local agencies were contacted and certain state and federal files and � lists reviewed to assess whether hazardous materials or oil may have been released into the soil or groundwater at or near the site. Some of the information was developed by telephone contact; other information is the result of direct interviews and , visits. The information made available to GZA during these visits, interviews and file reviews is summarized in the following paragraphs. , 3.10 LOCAL , To obtain information concerning the possible release of hazardous material or oil at . or near the study site, GZA contacted the Salem and Peabody Health and Fire Departments and the Clerk's Offices. According to information on file with the Salem � and Peabody Clerk's Offices, the following storage has been permitted for the site or for former occupants of the property: , 84-86 Boston Street. John Fl�n and Sons • 1940 - 15,000-gallon class B liyuids 1 : 1941 - 20,000-gallon class B liyuids 1945 - 2Q000-gallon class B liquids • 1973 - Bunker C fuel oil ' 1-15 Howlev Street. John Flvnn and Sons � • 1934 - 800 gallons of inflammables , � ' ' ' �I ' 9 Howley Street. John Flynn and Sons , � � 1944 to 1951 - 1,500 gallons of inflammables I 1946 - 800 gallons inflammables , 9 Howley Street. Gale Leather �c�,�` • 1941 to 1956 - 500 gallons of inflammables ' �u Information regarding the specific locations or nature of the material storage listed above was not made available during our file reviews. Additionally, we were unxble to determine whether the references to John Flyn❑ & Sons at 84-86 Bosron Street � refer to the study property. �, The Salem Fire Department has records of two USTs on the site; however, the information reviewed by GZA did not indicate the capacity or the contents of the USTs. The records indicate that the USTs are 10 and 20 years old. , There are no records of USTs on the site on file with the Peabody Fire Department. � Information on file with the Peabody Health Department indicates that some asbestos was removed from buildings on the site following the fire in 198). There was no detailed documentation of spills or releases of hazardous materials on file with either , the Salem or Peabody Health Departments. �I � 3.20 STATE Files made available to GZA at the Massachusetts Department of Environmental � Protection (DEP) Northeast Regional Office were reviewed on January 20, 1993. The DEP Incident Respo�se and the Spills Database files (in the Northeast Region) � indicated that two spills have occurred at the Site (see Table 1). GZA also reviewed documentation indicating there was an investigation by DEP � following a chemical fire which destroyed all of the tannery buildings at the site on March 17, 1989. The documentation indicated that air, water and soil samples were collected-at the site following the fire. Analytical results indicated the "air and water ' samples show contamination within acceptable limits, and preliminary PCB counts were below 50 ppm." The information also stated that the fuel tanks were to be emptied and removed from the site. � �� - 9 ' , , ' The DEP October 15, 1992 "List of Confirmed Disposal Sites and Locations To Be Investigated" (LTBI) identified the Former Mill Properties at 9 Howley Street in ' Peabody (the western portion of the site) as a LTBI site with a current listing as Phase I. No other properties within 1/4 mile of the site were listed. Pertinent sections of the DEP master Sites List are contained in Appendix C. tOur review of the DEP Water Supply Protection Atlas, did not indicate any nearby �� environmental sources of potential contamination such as salt storage sites, surface � impoundments, junkyards, and hazardous waste sites. Additionally, the atlas did not indicate any public water supplies within a mile of the site. � 3.30 FEDERAL GZA's review of the September 16, 1992 EPA list of hazardous waste generators, � transporters and treatment/storage/disposal facilities registered under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) identified twelve facilities within 1/4 mile of the study site. The hazardous waste generators in the vicinity of the site are listed � in Table 2. All of the generators listed are either very small, producing less than 100 kilograms of hazardous waste per month, or small-quantiry generarors of hazardous waste, producing between 100 and 1,000 kilograms per mcinth of hazardous � waste). The September 16, 1992 EPA Facility Index System (FINDS) list of companies � involved in any of 12 environmental databases included nine generators which are not on the RCRA list. � The September 29, 1992 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Information System (CERCLIS) list of sites for possible investigation ' under the Federal Superfund program listed the Henry Leather Company at 150 Main Street, approximately 500 feet west and topographically crossgradient of the site, and Pierpoint Park at 15 Pierpoint Street, approximately 1,000 feet south and topographically upgradient of the site. These sites are evaluated by EPA to determine ,, whether a complete site evaluation is warranted; the inclusion of a site on this list does not necessarily mean that it will be on the Nationa] Priority List (NPL) of federal , "Superfund" sites. Salem Acres located more than a mile west and crossgradient of the site has been listed on the NPL. , The 1981 and 1986-1990 EPA lists of companies with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits were reviewed. They showed the following companies, in the vicinity of the subject site, with NPDES permits: Bob-Kat Leather , � 10 , � ' , Company located at 166 Main Street, Stahl Finish at 26 Howley Street, and GTE Products Corp at 60 Boston Street. ,` Finaily, the September 23, 1992 Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) list of Hazardous Material and Oil Spills documented a spill of approximately 500 gallons � of No. 4 fuel oil at Whaleco Oil at 60 Boston Street on November 15, 1992. This spill was also identified on the DEP Incident Response and Spills Database files and listed �� on Table L The location is 500 feet east and crossgradient of the site. � 4.00 SITE RECONNAISSANCE , On April 5, 1993, GZA Environmental Scientist Judy Gilbert visited the site to � observe surficial conditions for evidence of the presence of hazardous materials or oil. Access to the Larrabee and Hingston property was provided by Mc Steve Buckley; access to the Jeffers Lumber Mill was provided by Mr. John Jeffers, Sc; access to the � ' 160 Boston Street was provided by Mr. Thomas Brenan. 4.10 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS � The Larrabee and Hingston property consists of three wood frame buildings. The I � main building has an office and is used ro manufacture wooden tanning drums and wooden tanks. There is also a vacant house which was previously used as an office and a storage building which sustained some damage from the fire at the adjacent � tannery. The main building is a single story structure with a basement which houses saws, � lathes, drills and various other woodworking equipment. The building is heated by an oil fired boiler; two aboveground 275-gallon fuel oil tanks were observed in the vicinity of the tanks within the basement. No signs of leaks or spills were observed in the ' vicinity of the tanks. No other oil or hazardous materials were observed on the site or are reportedly used on the site. No floor drains were observed in the mai❑ building. Standing water was observed in the basement of the building as a result of � flooding due to the spring melt. Also observed on the Larrabee and Hingston property was a large open structure with � a roof which was used to store lumber. The remains of two other storage structures were also observed on the site. � � 11 , ' , ' The Jeffer's Lumber Mill property consists of 6 buildings. These buildings are referenced as Buildings A to F on Figure 2. Building A is comprised of office space, warehouse space and a retail hardware store. According to Mr. Jeffers, the main ', portion of the building was constructed in 1945, with warehouse and storage space added in 1953, 1964 and 1969. The buifding is heated by an oil fired boiler. A 275- � gallon aboveground fuel oil tank was observed in the basement of the building. N� staining was observed in the vicinity of the tank. Other hazardous materials observed �� in this building included sma11 quantities of paints, thinners and adhesives which are � stored in the building for retail sale. Floor drains located in the building are reportedly connected to the municipal sewer. A drain which was observed at che bottom of the stairs leading to the basement is reportedly connected ro a dry welL � Building B is a single story, wood frame building constructed in 1945 and used for storage and as a lumber mill. Building C is a single story wooden building built in 1 1955 and used for storage and as a receiving office. Propane tanks used to fuel the on-site fork lifts were observed in this building. No other hazardous materials were observed in Buildings B and C. � Building D is a single story wooden storage shed which was built in 1964. Building E is a single story steel framed metal building built in 1988 which is used as a cutting � mill. Hazardous materials were not observed stored in either building. Building F is a residential dwelling owned by Jeffers Lumber. �I � The Brenan Property located at 160 Boston Street consists of a two family house which was constructed in 1867. The building is serviced by municipal water and sewer and �� is heated by natural gas and by an oil fired boiler. Fuel oil is stored i� two 275-gallon above ground fuel oil storage tanks located in the basement of the building. Acwrding to Mr. Brenan, one of the tanks sustained a leak last year and was � subsequently repaired. A slight oil stain was observed on the concrete floor in the vicinity of the tanks. Also on the site is a wooden storage shed and an in-ground pool. Standard household cleaning products are stored on the site; no other hazardous materials were observed on the site. �• The former Flynn Tannery property is occupied by the remains.of several buildings, � which were destroyed by a fire in 1989. There are currendy two buildings left standing. One is a two-story brick building with a tall brick smokestack, the other is a two-story concrete building. The brick building was boarded shut with no means ot easy access. According to representatives of ENPRO, this building may contain �. asbestos materials. The concrete building appeared to be completely gutted and partially demolished. For safety reasons, GZA did not access this building. � � 12 , � � , 4.20 EXTERIOR OBSERVATTONS The eastern portion of the site consists of the Jeffers Lumber buildings described �� above. Outside of the buildings there are associated paved and unpaved parking areas and access roads. A large undeveloped area exists on the far eastern portion of the site. This area is overgrown with grass and brush. A dirt road which originates off the �� main road to the site (see Figure 2) runs east-west across the northern portion of this �� area. A pile of burned lumber, apparently the remains of a burne� building, was � observed south of this road. Extensive dumping of debris and household rubbish was observed in the southeastern portion of the site, at the base of a steep hill leading up to the abutting residential areas. � The western portion of the site, which was formerly used for the tannery operations, ' consisted of several concrete slab and foundation footprints of the former buildings. , The general area outside the former buildings' foundation slabs is covered with gravel and weeds. The south-central part of the site rises sharply toward the cemetery and Jeffers Lumber. At the base and on the sides of the hill on the south-central part ot I � the site, many old rusty drums, scrap metal, car parts, concrete pieces and miscellaneous rubbish were observed. [ncidental rubbish including tires, brick and � scrap metal, and a large rusty aboveground tank east of the brick building were observed across the western segment of the site. Two dumpsters, which were referred to in a previous study as containing asbestos debris, were observed west of the access � road to the woodworking shops. While dumping of construction debris and rubbish is apparent throughout the property, we did not observe surficial evidence of oil or hazardous material other than minor staining. There was no surficial evidence of the � former solvent pit as described in previous reports. � 5.00 FIELD EXPLORATION, SAMPL[NG AND ANALYT[CAL PROGRAM � GZA completed a field exploration program as part of the present evaluation to assess the presence of oil or hazardous materials in soil and groundwater at the site. This program consisted of the excavation of 20 test pits, drilling of 6 borings, the � installarion of six monitoring wells in these borings, and the collection a�d screening analysis of soil and groundwater samples from both test pits and borings. , Exploration tocations were selected to obtain soil and groundwater samples from previously identified source areas -- specifically the area of the underground fuel oil tank and the former solvent pit area. In addition, explorations were located to obtain � general site coverage and to investigate the area under the footprint for�the proposed � 13 , , ! � new building at the site. Exploration locations were limited by the presence of a steep slope in the central portion of the site. An Exploration Location Plan is attached as � Figure 2. 5.10 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND MONITORING WELL � INSTALLATTONS �� On May S-6, 1993, 20 test pits (TP-100 to TP-119) were completed by Enpro Services, Inc. of Newburyport, Massachusetts. These test pits were excavated using a Case 580E � backhoe with a 1/3 cubic yard capacity and a 17-foot reach. On May 13, 1993, 6 soil borings (GZ-i to GZ-6) were completed by GZA Drilling, [nc. of Brockton, � Massachusetts. Hollow-stem auger techniques were employed without the use of drilling water or other fluids. � Test pits TP-101 and TP-102 were excavated in the area of the existing underground fuel oil tank. Test pits TP-106, TP-107 and TP-108 were dug in the area of the former � solvent pit. Test pits TP-112 through TP-117 covered the area of the proposed new building footprint. All other test pits were excavated for general site coverage. Soil boring GZ-1 was drilled immediately downgradient of an existing shop of Larrabee � and Hingston, and GZ-2 was drilled to evaluate soil and groundwater immediately downgradient of the former solvent pit. GZ-3 was drilled for site coverage.on the eastern side of the site; GZ-4 and GZ-6 were drilled to evaluate groundwater � underneath the proposed building footprint. GZ-5 was drilled immediately downgradient of the underground tank near Building No. 7. Test pit and boring logs are contained in Appendix D. All subsurface exploration locations are illustrated on Figure 2. �1 A monitoring well consisting of 10 feet of 2-inch-diameter PVC wellscreen attached � to solid PVC riser pipe was installed in each boring. The borings were generally 13 feet in depth, except for GZ-6 which was 24.5 teet deep. All PVC attachments were completed without the use of solvents or glues to prevent contamination. The I � wellscreen was set to span the water table encountered in the boring during driliing. A filter of clean silica sand was placed in the annular space around the wellscreen, and a bentonite clay seal was placed above this filter sand. Each well was completed with � a curb box. Well installation details are presented on the boring logs in Appendi�c D. 511 Groundwater Elevation Measurements � To evaluate the groundwater flow direction at the site, GZA conducted an elevation survey on May 21, 1993. The elevation of each monitoring well was �; measured using standard rod and level techniques. Both existing and previously � 14 � , � ', installed wells were used in the survey. The elevations were referenced to a bench mark (BM25) of 13.94 feet located off the northwestern corner of the property. These L elevations were used in conjunction with groundwater depth measurements made on May 21, 1993 to establish groundwater elevations. Groundwater depths are presenced on Table 3 and on the boring logs in Appendix D. Results are discussed in Section 6.10. � ��7 5.20 SOIL AND WATER SAMPLING � V� During test pit excavations subsurface soils were sampled either from the excavation walls or from the backhoe bucket. These samples were collected in clean glass jars, � stored in an ice-packed cooler and transported to GZA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory (ECL) in Newton, Massachusetts for possible chemical screening. During drilling of the new borings, split spoo❑ soil samples were ob[ained by Standard � Penetration Tests at 5-foot intervals during the drilling operations. All soil samples were classified by the on-site engineer; test pits and boring logs developed by GZA are attached as Appendix D. A portion of each soil sample was collected in a clean � glass jar, stored in an ice-packed cooler and transported to GZA's ECL for possible chemical screening. � On May 21 and 24, 1993, GZA personnel sampled existing monitoring wells and microwells, along with new monitoring wells at the study site. Groundwater samples were obtained using 5-foot stainless steel bailers with Teflon ball check valves or by i , a battery-powered peristaltic pump. A separate laboratory-cleaned bailer or new polyethylene tubing was used for each well to avoid cross-contamination. Three times the initial standing volume of the groundwater in the well was evacuated to remove �, stagnant water, and the well was allowed to recharge. Water samples were collected in hydrochloric acid preserved 40-m1 vials with Teflon septa and in clean 500-m1 amber � glass jars. Samples destined for metals analysis were collected in 500 ml polyethylene containers and filtered through a 0.45 micron pressure filtration system. The samples were kept cool until their delivery to GZA's ECL. � 5.30 CHEMICAL SCREENING OF SO[L AND WATER SAMPLES � Soil samples collected from the site were screened in the field for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using an H-Nu Model PI-101 photoionization detector (PID) with a 10.2 electron volt lamp. The PID measures relative levels of VOCs referenced to � a benzene in air standard. Although the PID screening cannot be directly used to quantify VOC concentrations or identify individual compounds, the results can serve as a relative indicator of the levels of VOCs in each sample. Field PID screening � � 1� � t � � results are presented on the test pits and boring logs in Appendix D and are discussed in Section 6.20. � Selected soil samples were also analyzed for VOCs, semi-volatiles, petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC), PCBs and metals. Based on preliminary PID screening, a total �� of 16 (see Table 4) soil samptes were further screened for VOCs by GC and static headspace techniques and 3 were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8240. Seven samples were analyzed for PHCs, of which 3 were further analyzed by a fingerprint �, �� technique which allows determination of specific hydrocarbons detected. Four samples were submitted for semi-volatile analysis and three for PCB screening. All VOC, PHC and PCB analyses were performed by GZA at our ECL. �' A total of 7 soil samples were submitted for RCRA 8 metals analyses by Matrix Analytical, Inc. of Hopkinton, Massachusetts. Analytical procedures and laboratory � data sheets are presented in Appendix E. Results are discussed in Section 6.21, and presented on Tables 4, 5 and 6. ', Groundwater samples from selected test pits, previously installed monitoring wells or microwells, and all new monitoring wells were also screened for VOCs using the GC and static headspace techniques or EPA method 8240. A total of 14 samples were i � submitted for GC screening and 6 were analyzed by EPA Method 8240. A total of 6 samples were submitted for PHC analyses. All VOC and PHC analyses were performed by GZA at our ECL. In addition, 4 groundwater samples were submitted I �' to Matrix Analytical for RCRA eight metats analyses. Procedures and results are presented in Appendi� E. Resuhs are discussed in Section 6.22, and presented on Tables 7 and 8. �: � � 6.00 FIELD EXPLORATION AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS � The following sections summarize the soil conditions encountered as well as the results of chemical screening of soil and water. � 6.10 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil conditions are summarized from the test pit and boring logs attached as Appendix D. ' The generalized subsurface profile at the site consists of a layer of fill overlying a sand � deposit. The gradation of the sand deposit varies substantially across the site as do � � 16 � � � ,� tbe relative percentages of silt and graveL In the northern portion of the site near the North River Canal, the sand contains up to 50 percent graveL In the southeastern part � of the site there are silt, clay, and silty clay zones within the sand. On the eastern side of the site, a fill layer up to 5 feet thick overlies the sand; this deposit consisted of dark brown fine to coarse sand and up to 50 percent gravel, with a trace of silt, cinders and concrete fragments. � Depth to groundwater in the monitoring welis and microwells varied trom � �� approximately 2.7 feet (MW-2) in the northern part of the site near the canal, to , 7.5 feet in the southern part of the site where the land surface rises. At GZ-6 the. depth to water was approximately 18.0 feet as this well was installed at a higher elevation up the hill than the majority of the site (see Table 3). �� A groundwater elevation contour plan developed from our May 21, 1993 � measurements is presented as Figure 3. Groundwater elevations in the microwells and monitoring wells indicate that groundwater flow at the site is generally toward the north; however, there appears to be some minor mounding in a north-south directio❑ "�1 immediately east of the Peabody/Salem line. This mounding may be a reflection of increased runoff from the land surface which drops sharply in this area. In addition there is a minor groundwater low on the southwestern side of the site in the region of � the former buildings. This low area is possibly the result of subsurface utilities near Main Street. In general, however, groundwater flow is north toward the North River � Canal. 6.20 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL SCREENING ANALYSES � 6.21 Soil � Results of field screening of test pit soils with the PID did not indicate the � presence of elevated levels of VOCs except near the UST north of Building No. 7 and the solvent pit areas. In test pits TP-101 and TP-102, located immediately � downgradient of the tank, PID readings of 195 ppm and 190 ppm, respectively, were reported from soil just above the observed groundwater level. In test pit TP-107, located in the former solvent pit area, a PID reading of 150 was measured in soils � from the vicinity of the water table. Results of PID screening of soils collected during the installation of the GZA �� borings did not indicate the presence of total VOCs except at Boring GZ-5 located downgradient of TP-101 near the underground tank. A reading of 3 ppm was detected from the surface and 5- to 7-foot samples. P[D readings are contained in the test pit � and boring logs in Appendix D. �; 17 � � � � ,� Results of VOC screening of test pit soils by GC screening did not indicate the � presence of identifiable VOCs except at test pit TP-102. At test pit TP-102, sample S-1 (from approximately 1 foot), 770 ppb of tetrachloroethene (PCE), 170 ppb of � � � trichloroethene (TCE) and 140 ppb of cis 1,2 dichloroethene (1,2 DCE)were detected. " Numerous "unknown" compounds were also detected in the soil samples TP-101, S-2 and TP-102, S-4; these compounds exhibited a chromatographic pattern indicative of I �, petroleum distillates. ' �� Elevated total petroleum hydrocarbon content(TPHC)concentrations were also , detected in soils from test pits TP-101 and TP-102. Reported TPHC levels in TP-101, S-3 and TP-102, S-3 were 1,600 and 7,900 ppm, respectively. Fingerprint analysis of I � both soil samples identified the petroleum product as "mineral spirits." Low levels (120 ppm) of mineral spirits were also detected in soil sample TP-107, S-2 near the ' solvent pit. L,ow levels of TPHCs (47 to 130 ppm) were also identified in TP-113 and TP-ll4 in the area of the proposed building footprint. � Three soil samples (TP-101, S-3; TP-102, S-3; TP-107, S-2) wi[h elevated TPHC '�, concentrations were further screened for the presence of PCBs. None were detected. Additionally, four soil samples were screened for selected semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using GC techniques (see Appendix D). Screening results � indicated the presence of a number of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS) at concentrations ranging from 0.12 to 13 ppm. PAHs are components of various � petroleum products and products of combustion which are ubiyuitous in urban environments. Analytical results for PCBs and SVOCs are presented on Table 5, and laboratory data is contained in Appendix D. Seven soil samples, representing seven test pits, were analyzed for RCRA 8 � metals. Elevated cadmium concentrations (48 ppm) were detected in sample TP-108, � S-2, while elevated lead levels (590 to 910 ppm) were detected in soil samples from test pits 101 and ll3. Slightly elevated cadmium levels (5 to ll ppm) were also reported in each of the other soil samples analyzed. With the exception of these � constituents/samples, reported metals levels were within anticipated background ranges from available literature, as summarized on Table 6. Metals data is summarized on Table 6; analytical data is contained in Appendix D. �. 6.22 Groundwater Screening results for groundwater from three test pits, seven existing monitoring � wells, three existing microwells and six new monitoring wells for VOCs by GC screening did not indicate the presence of identifiable VOCs. However, unknown � compounds were detected in the groundwater from three test pits (TP-101, TP-107 and �� 18 �� TP-108). A review of the chromatograms indicates that these unkno�vns may be a petroleum distillate such as fuel oil or mineral spirits. �, Results of VOC analyses by EPA Method 8240 for groundwater samples from two existing monitoring wells, one existing microwell and three new monitoring wells � � indicated the presence of inethyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) in 5 of the 6 water samples analyzed at concentrations ranging from 10 to 92 ppb. Low levels of benzene (11 ppb) �� were detected in the groundwater sample from GZ-5. Reported MTBE levels were well below the state drinking water guideline for this constituent (700 ppb). The I �I benzene concentration measured in GZ-5 was slightly higher than the drinking water standard for this compound (5 ppb). I � Petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) analysis of the 6 groundwater samples selected (MW-1, MW-7, PS-2, GZ-2, GZ-4 and GZ-5) indicated only 12 parts per million � (ppm) in MW-7 and 0.44 ppm in GZ-4. VOC and PHC screening results for groundwater are contained in Appendix E and summarized on Table 7. Four groundwater samples were analyzed for RCRA 8 metals (GZ-2, GZ-4, PS-2, GZ-5). I `� Metals concentrations were below relevant drinking water standards or method detection limits in all samples with the exception of silver in wells GZ-4 and GZ-5. While the silver levels reported in. these welis (40 to 60 ppb) are somewhat elevated, �� this element has recently been dropped from its previous regulatory status due to its. limited toxicity. � Specific conductivity and pH screening was conducted o❑ 17 groundwater samples. Tt�e pH of the groundwater was within normal parameters for all 17 � samples, while the specific wnductance was in excess of 1,000 "s/�,„ in groundwater samples from MW-6, MW-7 and MW-9, and PS-2. � 6.30 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Analytical data from previous studies indicated that groundwater on the western portion of the site was contaminated by low levels of vichloroethene (TCE). Previous � studies also detected two isolated zones of soil contamination in the area of an abandoned UST and in the area of a "solvent pit" associated with the former use of the property as tanneries or morocco factories. � Present groundwater wnditions evaluated at 20 sampling points did not detect the � presence of elevated VOCs or elevated TPHCs. Low levels of one compound, MTBE, were detected at five locations. MTBE is a gasoline additive and would not be expected to be the result of on-site activity at the study site. It is our opinion that �� 19 � t � � � observed groundwater conditions would not warrant remedial action, other than possible localized treatment associated with the USTs or the solvent pit area. �, Soil conditions evaluated by 20 test pits and six borings confirmed the presence of two localized areas of soil contamination near an abandoned fuel oil tank and a "solvent , � pit." Analyticai data indicates that the soils in both areas contain elevated levels of petroleum hydrocarbons characterized as "mineral spirits." These contaminants are ��7[� likely the result of Stoddard Solvent usage previously documented at the site. L,u Elevated concentrations of lead and cadmium were also reported sporadically in soil � samples from the site. Additionatly, PAHs were detected consistently at Ievels which are commonly observed in urban soils. � 7.00 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS � An environmental site evaluation was conducted at the Former Tannery Site in '� Peabody/Salem, Massachusetts. The study included a site reconnaissance, a review ' � of site history, a review of previous reports of the site and a review of available local, state and federal regulatory records. In addition, a subsurface exploration program consisting of 20 test pits, six monitoring well installations and chemical analysis of soil � and groundwater was conducted. � On the basis of the work conducted as part of this site evaluation, GZA has reached the conclusions described below: � 1. Historical documents indicate that the western portion of the property has been used as tanneries and moroccoing factories for approximately 100 years. The eastern portion of the site has been used by lumber companies and barrel � makers for over 50 years. � 2. Leather working was terminated in 1989 when a fire destroyed most of the buildings on the west side of the site. The fire resulted in the notification to Department of Environmental Protection of a possible chemical release to the � environment, and of the presence of asbestos in burned out buildings. 3. Emergency response activities performed by ENPRO Services, Inc. after the � fire included the pumping of tanks, the removal of drums, and the removal of some asbestos from the site. Cleanup was terminated for nonpayment. � � 20 � � � � 4. Previous studies detected low levels of groundwater contamination by trichloroethylene, and isolated areas of soil contamination by petroleum � hydrocarbon compounds on the west side of the study site. No significant environmental problems were discovered on the east side of the study site. � 5. Local, state and federal file reviews did not identify sites or properties of environmental concern within 1/2 mile which might impact the study site. �� Presently, possibly three abandoned underground storage tanks, and two abandoned aboveground tanks, are present at the site. Several of the existing � structures have active fuel oil tanks in basements for heating purposes. � 6. Local and state files reviewed did not identify any nearby sensitive receptors such as public water supplies, within 1/2 mile of the study site. � 7. Buildings on the west side of the properry have been razed by fire. No surficial evidence of hazardous material usage remains in this area except for the tanks noted above. Significant quantities of hazardous materials are not used in the �� Larrabee and Hingston and Jeffers Lumber buildings, or within the residential properties included in the study site. All existing buildings are serviced by the municipal water and sewer systems. � 8. Due to the condition of two fire damaged structures (Building 3 and 1 Building 7), these properties were not entered. We therefore can make no � opinion on the presence of two tanks previously identified by others within Building No. 3, and/or the possible presence of asbestos within the buildings. � 9. The present study consisted of the completion of 20 test pits and six monitoring wells, and the sampling of a total of 17 monitoring wells and microwells. � Groundwater analysis did not detect the presence of elevated levels of volatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons or metals. 10. Two isolated areas of soil contamination near an abandoned underground ti storage tank and a former solvent pit were discovered. The principal � contaminants are petroleum hydrocarbons which were characterized as mineral � spirits. Neither of the two areas are within the footprint of the proposed building at the site. 1L Cadmium levels were reported at concentrations above anticipated background � levels in a few soil samples from the site. L,ead levels were above background levels, but not substantially above typical industrial or urban areas. �� 21 ' � � � Additionally, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon compounds were detected in soils from the site at levels which are commonly observed in urban soils. � In conclusion, the conditions detected by this recent subsurface exploration program are generally consistent with the data contained in previous reports completed in 1991 ' and 1992, however, groundwater quality appears to have improved since the last groundwater samples were anatyzed in 1992. � �� In our opinion, groundwater conditions encountered in this or previous studies would not warrant large scale treatment or remediation. It is probable, however, that localized groundwater collection and treatment/disposal may be necessary during the � � removal of existing abandoned underground storage tanks, and the remnants of the solvent pit. This work may include the removal of separate phase product from the excavations or the dewatering of the tank excavations to remove sheens on the water � table. � The two most significant areas of soil contamination detected in this investigation were ' � also associated with an abandoned underground storage tank and the solvent pit. While the exact extent of the soil contamination was not evaluated, it is estimated that soil removal in these two areas would each be limited to approximately 500 cubic 'I � yards of contaminated soiL It should be noted, however, that the abandoned underground storage tanks and I ' solvent pit are not within the proposed building footprint, and remediation of soil and groundwater in these areas would not be expected to impact construction activities. � However, earthwork activities at the site may encounter localized zones of soil contamination resulting from uncontrolled localized disposal which has evidently occurred throughout the site. Handling and disposal of contaminated soils from the � site may result in additional premium costs during planned development. ' 8.00 L[MITAT[ONS GZA's site evaluation was performed in accordance with ge�erally accepted practices � ,, of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area, and GZA observed that degree of care and skill generally exercised � by other consultants under similar circumstances and conditions. GZA's findings and conclusions must be considered not as scientific certainties, but rather as our professional opinion concerning the significance of the limited data gathered during the course of the environmental site evaluation. No other warranty, express or � � 22 � � ' � implied, is made. Specifically, GZA does not and cannot represent that the site contains no hazardous material, oil, or other latent condition beyond that observed by � GZA during its site evaluation. This report is also subject to the specific limitations contained in Appendix A. ' This study and report have been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Stop & Shop Companies, Inc., solely for use in an environmental evaluation of the site. �� This report and the findings contained herein shall not, in whole or in part, be , disseminated or conveyed to any other party, nor used by any other party in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of GZA. However, GZA acknowledges and agrees that the report may be wnveyed to the Seller/Lender associated with the � proximate purchase of the site by our Client, ro the extent set forth in our February 1, 1993 proposal. f/dmh/1317?.1/1317?.r �' � �' � � � � � ' � � 23 � 1 � TABLES � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � - � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � r r� � 1 ' File No. 13172.10 Ol/Ol/93:initial ' TABLE 1 OIL/HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RELEASES IN THE VICINITY OF ' 9, 19 AND l9 REAR HOWLEY STREET AND 164 BOSTON STREET 1 ' Description of Orientatiooz Date Location Release 4 Howley Street and chemical fire site 3/17/89 , Main Street Tanner Autobody gaseous fumes and 500 feet north 8/16/89 88 Walnut Street vapors , Whaleco Oil 5 gallons of #4 fuel oil 500 fee[ east 3/1/90 60 Boston Street ' Howley Street asbesros site 1/12/90 146 Main Street 1-10 gallons #2 fuel oil 500 feet west ' Bob-Kat Leather #2 fuel oil 500 feet wes[ 3/12/91 166 Main Street ' Bob-Kat l.eather less than one gallon of 500 fee[ west ` 5/22/91 166 Main Street red dye John Smidt Company 1,200 gallons of #6 fuel 500 feet west 3/21/78 , 21 Caller Stree[ oil SL Basilios Church 400 gallons #2 fuel oil 1,200 feet 8/12/83 5 Paleologos Street northwest ' Smith Chemical/ Henry chemical fire 500 feet west 5/8/84 Leather ' Main Stree[ Clark Barrel oil �00 feet west 5/16/85 24 Caller Stree[, Rear ' Foreign Car Cen[er waste oil runoff 500 feet north 4/8/87 55 Walnut Stree[ ' Stahl Finish sheen on brook 300 fee[ north 4/9/87 26 Howley S[reet Henry Leather Company #6 fuel oil 500 feet west 11/5/87 , 13 Caller Stree[ J.R. Sousa gasoline 200 feet west 1/17/88 174 Main Stree[ ' Sams Service, Inc. gasotine odors 1,000 feet east 3/17/87 ll9 Boston Street ' ' I i ' ' TARLE 1 (con't.) � OIL/HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RELEASES IN TH� VICIN[TY OF 9, 19 AND 19 REAR HOWLEY STREET AND 164 BOSTON STREET � ' ' Description of OrientationZ Da[e Loca[ion Release John Flynn Leather 20-30 gallons #6 fuel oil 1,200 feet east 7/1/85 � Company from a leaking UST 80 Boston Street Daley's Oil* 80 gallons of fuel oil 300 feet 4/25/88 ' 173 Boston Street southeast Notes ' 1. This list was developed from a review of the following: � • Massachuse[[s Depar[men[ of Emironmen[al Pro[ec[ion (DEP) Inciden[ Response files (IRF) reviewed on .lanuary 20, 1993. • DEP Spills Database (SPD) dated January 1993. ' 2. Orie�tation in relation to Ihe subject site is approximate. * = facility may be upgradient oF the subjec[ si[e based on [he assumed groundwater flow direction. ! f/dmh/131721/13172.t1 ' ' ' � ' ' � � � � � File No. 13172.10 Ol/Ol/93:initials ' TABLE 2 REGULATED FACILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF ' � 9, 19, AND 19 REAR HOWLEY STREET AND 164 BOSTON STREETl � Facility Name/ Address Status Orieota[ion3 ' *Auto Machine of Salem SQG 1,000 feet sou[h 10 Aborn Street *Bos[on Street Autobody VQG 200 feet southeast ' 165A Boston S[reet *Frank Auto Repair SQG 1,000 feet sou[h , 10 Aborn S[reet *North Shore Automative SQG 1,000 feet south l0A Aborn S[reet ' Salem Service Center SQG 1,000 feet east 119 Boston Street ' Becker Loring Corp. SQG 500 feet nor[h 65 Walnut Stree[ Clark S[eel Drum SQG 500 feet wes[ � Company, Inc. 24R Caller S[reet , Foreign Car Cen[er VQG 500 fee[ north 55 Walnut Stree[ Goodyear Tire and Rubber SQG 200 feet west ' Company 174 Main Street Salem Suede, Ina VQG 500 feet north ' S5 1/2 Walnu[ Stree[ Stahl Finish VQG 200 feet north � ?b Howley Street Tanner City Autobody VQG 500 feet north 88 Walnut Street , Henry Lea[her Company, '"* 500 feet west Inc. 150 Main Street � Mass Split, Inc. '* 500 fee[ north 55 1�2 Walnut Street � � � � ` TARLE 2 (con't.) � REGULATED FACILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF 9, 19, AND 19 REAR HOWLEY STREET AND 164 BOSTON STREETI � Facility Name/ � Address Status Orientation3' Aronson Barrel Company ** 500 feet west 24 Caller Street , Avnet, Inc. ** 500 feet north 65 Walnut Street ' Fermon Tanning Corp. *� 500 feet north 27 Walnut Street � John Smidt Company, Inc. ** 500 feet west 21 Caller Street Bob-Kat Tanning Company, ** 500 feet west Inc. , 166 Main Street John Flynn and Sons ** 1,200 feet eas[ � SO Boston Street Sam's Service, Inc. "* 1,000 feet east 119 Boston Street � Notes: , 1. This list was developed From a review of the following: • EPA list of hazardous waste generators, transporters and treatment/storage/disposal facilities registered under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) dated September 16, � 1992. • EPA Facility Index System (FINDS) list dated September 16, 1992. 2. SQG = Small Quantity Genera[or ' LQG = Large Quantily Generator VQG = Very Small Quantity Generator � 3. Orientation in rela[ion to the subject si[e is approximate. * = facility may be upgradien[ of the subject s�te based on the assumed groundwater flow direchon. ** = company is included on FINDS list, but not on RCRA list FINDS does not specify generator , status. f/dmh/1317?1/13173.@ � � . � ' � File No. 13172.1 5/25/1993 mjo � Page 1 of 1 TABLE 3 � GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA Former Tannery Site Salem\Peabody,Massachusetts � Well Measuring Measunng Depth to Groundwater ID Point Point Groundwater ElevaUon � Elevation MW-1 To of PVC 16.70 4.46 12.2 ' MW-2 To of PVC 12.51 2.65 9.9 MW-3 To of PVC MW-4 D � MW-5 To of PVC 15.89 334 12.5 MW-6 To of PVC 22.88 6.69 16.2 MW-7 To of PVC 15.61 3.62 12.0 � MW-8 To of PVC 13.83 232 11.5 MW-9 To of PVC 14.05 2.69 11.4 � PS-1 T of Steel 14.84 4.84 10.0 PS-2 To of Steel 15.41 4.00 11.4 PS-3 D � PS-4 To of Steel 18.28 5.96 123 PS-5 D PS-6 D � PS-7 To of Steel 16.72 4.40 123 GZ-1 To of PVC 1732 5.20 121 � GZ-2 To of PVC 1631 4.11 12.2 GZ-3 Top of PVC 17.52 7.53 10.0 GZ-4 To of PVC 13.68 3.76 9.9 i ' GZ-5 To of PVC 1533 2.77 12.6 GZ-6 To of PVC 30.50 17.95 12.5 BM25 Brass Plate 13.94 na na , Notes: 1 All measurements are recorded in feet. � 2. Water elevauons are relative to BM25 on Howley Street. � BM25 elevation of 13.937 feet, information given by R. Boschard of South Essex Sewerage District. 3. D - indicates well was unable to be located or destroyed at time of ineasurement. 4. na- indicates no[applicable � f/dmh/13172.1/tables/t3.xls � � � File No. 13172.1 � 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 � TABLE 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SOILS: (VOCs,PHC) Former Tannery Site �` Salem\Peabody,Massachusetts I � Sample ID VOCs b GC Scre�n( b7 VOCs by 824Q b) PHCs PCE TCE cis'';1,2DCE Unknowns All , ( m) ' ' TP-101,S-2 -- -- -- 58 * na na TP-101, S3 na na na na 1600*** TP-102, 5-1 770 170 140 -- na na TP-102, 5-3 na na na na -- 7900*** �' TP-102, S-4 -- -- -- 40 * na na TP-105, S-1 -- -- -- 1 ** na na � TP-106, S-1 -- -- -- -- na na TP-107, 5-2 na na na na 120*** � TP-108, S-2 -- -- -- 1 ** na __ TP-108, 5-3 na na na na na 430 TP-109, S-1 -- -- -- 1 ** na na � TP-113, S-2 -- -- -- 1 ** na 47 TP-ll4, S-1 1 ** na 130 TP-116, S-2 -- -- -- 1 ** na na � TP-117, S-2 -- -- -- 1 ** na na TP-119, S-2 1 ** na na � Notes: ' 1. Test Pit samples taken by GZA personnel on May ll-12, 1993. 2. VOC analyses by GC and method 8240 performed by GZA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory in Newton,Massachusetts. Only those compounds detected aze listed. , 3. PHC analyses performed by GZA's Environmental Chemisay Laborarory in Newton, MassacLusetts. 4. na indicates not analyzed for listed parameters. � 5. --indicates not detected. 6. * indicates unknowns may be a petrolwm dis[illate 7. * * indicates unknowns are methanol--a laboratory artifact. � 8. *** Fingerprint analysis indicates petroleum prodact in the boiling range of mineral spirits. � f/dmIJ13172.1/tables/T4.XI,S � � � File No. 13172.1 06/02193:dja � Pagelofl TABLE 5 � ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST PIT SOII.S: (Semi-VOCs, PCBs) Former Tannery Site � Salem\Peabody, Massachusetts Sam le ID � Semi-VOCs( b) : TP-101,S-3 TP-102, S-3 TP-105, S-1 TP-107,S-2 POLYAROMATIC,: � HYDROCAftBONS' -- -- -- Naphthalene 200 Acena hthylene -- -- -- -- Acenaphthene 1300 3000 94 120 � Fluorene 800 920 120 200 Phenanthrene 3500 1200 1200 290 � Mthracene 1100 3100 180 150 Fluoranthene 2400 9400 3500 340 � Pycene 2500 13000 3700 390 Benzo-a-anthracene 910 10000 2300 Chrysene 560 8200 1800 -- � Benzo-b-flouranthene 1500 8000 2400 -- Benzo-k-flouranthene 1500 7100 1600 Benzo-a- yrene -- 3300 150 -- Indeno-1,2,3-cd yrene -- 3700 1100 -- � PHTHALATES ( b) -- -- -- � ADIPATES ( b) ' -- -- -- -- PCBs( b) -- -- �a -- � Notes: ' 1. Test Pit Soils taken by GZA personnel on May 5-6, 1993. 2. Semi-VOC analyses(by Gas C6romatograph) and PCB screening performed by GZA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory in Newron,Massachusetts. Only d�ose compounds detected are lis[ed. � 3. na indicates nothing detected. 4. --indicates not detected. � - 5. * indicates unknowns detected may be a pe7oleum distillate such as fuel oil. 6. ** indicates trace levels of two early eluting�nknown compounds which may be the product of microbial degradauon. ' � f/dmh/13172.1/tables/TS.XLS . � � � � �i! � � i� � �' � fl� f� !i � � � �i � �J File No. 13172.1 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 TABLE 6 ANALYTICAL RESULTS TEST P[T SOILS: (METALS) Foaner Tannery Si[e Salem\Peabody, Massachusetts Sample ID Co�eentration(m /k )' As ' iBa Cd ' 'Cr Pb HE Se ;Ag TP-107, S-1 163 30.0 9.0 72.5 28.5 -- -- -- TP-108, S-2 35.5 27.0 48.0 72.5 46.0 -- -- -- TP-101, S-3 5.1 39.0 SA 12.0 38.0 0.1 -- -- TP-102, S3 193 156.0 10.0 35.0 910.0 0.6 1.0 -- TP-109, S-1 13.5 59.0 5.0 211.0 240.0 0.2 -- -- TP-113, S-2 10.8 140.0 ll.0 179.0 590.0 1.4 0.8 TP-114, S-1 9.7 52.0 8.0 42.0 240.0 02 -- -- I Literature Background <0.1 -73 10- 5,000 0.01 - 0.7 1 - 3,000 2 - 300 0.01 -3A <01 - 3.9 0.01 - 5 Notes: 1. Samples collected by GZA personnel on May 11, 1993. 2. Analyses perfonned by Matrix Annlytical,Inc. of Hopkinton,MA. Results conrained in Appendix E. 3. TP refers to test pit number, S-#refers to sample number in test piL Test pit logs are contained in Appendix D. 4. -- indicates nothing detected. 5. "Literamre Background" vxlaes represent ranges of inetals reported in namral soils from the following three sources: a) Wallace H. Fuller Movement of Selected Metals, Asbestos and Cyanide in soil: Applicxuons to Waste Disposxl Problems (EPA-600/2-77-020) b) H.1. M Bower "Toxic Elements in Biochemistry" (1966). c) Hansford Shacklette and Josephine Boerngen, "Element Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial Materials of the Centeiminous United Sta[es" (USGS Paper 1270, 1984). duilJ13172.1 hablea/T6.xls � File No. 731721 � 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 , TABLE 7 ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUNDWATER: (VOCs,PHC) � Former Tannery Site Salem\Peabody,Massachussetts � Sample ID VOCs by GC Screen b}' ' VOCs (Methoci&?AO) ( b} PHCs PCE TCE cis`1,2DCE unlmowns MTBE BENZENE PCE ( m) ' TP-101 -- -- -- 13* na na na na T'P-107 28* na na na na TP-108 -- -- -- 1* na na na na � MW-1 na na na na -- -- BMQL -- MW-2 -- -- -- -- na na na na MW-3 -- -- -- -- na na na na � MW-6 -- -- -- -- na na na na MW-7 na na na na 10 12 MW-8 -- -- -- -- na na na na '� MW-9 -- -- -- -- na na na na PS-1 -- -- -- -- na na na na � PS-2 na na na na 92 -- -- -- PS-4 -- -- -- -- na na na na P$-7 -- -- -- -- na na na na I� GZ-1 -- -- -- -- na na na na GZ-2 na na na na 16 -- -- -- GZ-3 -- -- -- -- na na na na � GZ-4 na na na na 13 -- -- 0.44 GZ-5 na na na na 12 11 -- � GZ-6 -- -- -- 2** na na na na Notes: � 1. Groundwater samples taken by GZA personnel on May 21 and 24, 1993. 2. VOC analyses by GC and method 8240 perfoimed by GZA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory � in Newton, MassacLusetts. Only tLose compounds detected are listed. 3. PHC analyses performed by GZA's Environmental Chemistry Laboratory � in New[on,Massachusetts. 4. na indicates not analyzed for listed parameters. 5. -- indicates not detected. ' 6. * indicates unknowns detected may be a petroleum dis[illate such as fuel oil. 7. ** indicates rrace levels of two early eluting unlmown compounds which may be the product of microbial degradabon. ' Brm�n.xi.s , � � �1 � 1f� !� � � � � � !!s '7 � � !. �171 /J � 17�� File No. 13172.1 06/02/93:dja Page 1 of 1 TABLE S ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUNDWATER: (DISSOLVED METALS) Former Tannery Site Salem\Peabody,Massachusetrs Well ID; Conccnrcadon(u /1) As Ba', ' C� Ct ; ' Pb H ' Se Ag j GZ-2 , - 80_ 1 -- 3 — — -- G�4 -- 50 2 -- 2 -- -- 60 PS-2 -- 10 1 -- -- -- -- -- GZ-5 6 20 1 38 8 -- -- 40 Notes: 1. Samples collected by GZA personnel on May 21, 1993. All samples filtered with 0.45 micron filter. 2. Analyses performed by Matrix Malytical, Inc.of Hopkinton,MA. Results contained in Appendix E. 3. GZ refers to GZA moni[oring well;PS refers to Pine &Swallow Microwell. 4. -- indicates nothing detected. f/dmh/13172.1 hablesTB.XLS ' � �; � File No. 131721 5/28/93 : mjo � Page 1 of 1 TABLE 9 SCREENING RESULTS: GROUNDWATER � pH AND SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE Former Tannery Site � Salem/Peabody, Massachusetts Conected ' Well I.D. pH SpeciFic Canductivity; ; (uS/cm} MW-1 6.11 316 � MW-2 6.45 193 MW-3 6.46 492 � MW-4 D MW-5 712 242 MW-6 5.93 2,100 MW-7 6.67 1,755 MW-8 7.06 957 MW-9 6.89 1,200 � PS-1 6.75 411 PS-2 7.39 1,256 � PS-3 D �� PS-4 6.71 403 PS-5 D � PS-6 D PS-7 . 6.93 575 GZ-1 6.26 659 ' � GZ-2 6.65 753 GZ-3 6.50 197 � GZ-4 7.05 569 GZ-6 7A1 562 � Notes: 1 All measurements aze recorded in feet. � 2. Water elevations are relative to BM25 on Howley Street. BM25 elevadon of 13.937 feet,information given by R. Boschard t of South Essex Sewerage District. 3. D- indicates well was unable to be located or desuoyed at time � of ineasurement. � f/dmh/13772.1hables/T-9.XI.S � FIGURES _..� �r � r� r�r� :�s � � s � r a■� � a w � � r �■■i � � �, w r � +� �r .�s i �r r s�► a �■�r �.r � � +�t wr � .. � � � r� � ,i� �� Q li �'` I '�1 [�c ��j��, �n � r�y��,� ��`�� v .��' fjri:�k�,�_•[)�j/j]�7� ,f�� .a. I�`7j i ./�� J �..�✓�� . �� , %�� , �, �r3��'� .. '� �� .� �� -� �J` �li/ �M/Ir.�L.�► "�f@� � � �s ��'}�� /�, \ i � ��{= 5�� .��A�,.�„�r�,\ ��-�I,�:'�� /�.�aP��.c.��- __ . ��`_�� `�,� �� i��;��s,'J!J `•�l i�r�� t" � - �xU�/ �v r �//,-/�y��//', � � �� ;`•.�� _ � � l��f� \ \�a� ~�IA� �d�•� �'I�!;�� 1 _ ra _ �_ `�s' '\ ��I�l�� 1R�_ _- A\__ �� /�y� � �I�� ts j.�jY '�'� -_�.—,1 a•` � ��. �/,�--�■(:a�c�1��/�� /, �� !.:: I � �. j�i � ii � _ . _ y � � ��y'� ` �\i��\1t0��-`.�� G� � � � � '; � ;��Ya�±�l��at �t�, ��,'fi•� ,�--� ��;�., �.. j �:� �,V�� . � ,: s �, � � �* � � ��=�- �J�a1��4'`� ��,ri�' ��'�`��.� i ��i��1.�,� � ��4�114�,_�_, d,�o�,'►.�%r��Ji�r�r,.� .`�,�1 //= � . ., • � `..-"rJ .� .rislicvrsl\\li�a�,��"�,*� t}4+� '�i�.��1 or�- �� r /.� ��li_ � ;: � � � .� ��+r��`t�� o,��j'��'�sl��/ •n �� '�o ��'i� , ��. ((�,� , ��,� � ,� ' �a � J,�;�:�-�� -�;,��;,.t + �,�l�t��jJ ��-'�� G.«fu�ttuii i Wa u�.a�� o �i � �.I -ti .��" � ,:��!p,<e J I �� .- ~/ � � i ird �p ' 'S� / �'�� 4�1 Ir.'d � `�1 �+ I_ �- ` �='! � � �r,, ,. � s /:..- ;�,�.�C��;,��•� ,�l�t?�� r��!� (��,r-•� ��j��- r� , � : r` �. � `' ■ �, `_p��, ; ;\ ;f., � ��+h�'��/ �� - � ! � q� � �i �.�y= �L , �!11►i� � I�.� ;j �� '�� '� �f ��a��lr�j:j � `J.',^''; .�� '\ �- � I � F t ad►�,.. 91� � Il' ) �,�s� , +� < �� i �I�'��..�r i�'�� ' �� I��_ ��.� " � ✓�:-�<t�� '��'�"'�7��'��` �� " �� i\ � �`(�� ..�r.s.•,� �, /'��sr,.?'.i�.. �'�j�� '�.�°.s � \`�� G�a � '/��•Y �.�,-�m- .r- 41ti�'` �/,� �e:e-WV;� e'�°�li�i�' �' o�A . � 0 �\ � r A�//d� - t� , � ! ��` ��'�;` � �r�.��'�%' �� ;- , , �� c� `� �` � � � ,: � R � �:�� ; T`^��r �1��_ ",e�-�-~'�. , ..rJ'��(',l�.�>j►��'�.,,s , ✓•: r�,�r•!�•� S � �N`��. � I � � :�fs �,: .�„��i,�._ ; . ��►��.d`I �, il ��))�� _ �'��..�'�� 7 l��f��.�i � � f I��f•�� '��j I� al► � �� o � �1- F \, � � r..Ir,�.��' _ � ,p �� ,; �'--�r'-� ��',� ��'��1'i��\�� +��'`��::�` � ��U� _ ,�, — � 1��!� � �� =�� • , � �' V`' '� � I.✓��1.��,�►'�y �' ' !' � `,��1��,�: �,L.�J:,�.r �.�, l : � � ♦ �i � � . -Y 'i�� „,. i�� il � ��r��.�e`:��.,M,c��.'a`a.w��.�rra s��a =�►�.+►►�.�Y',I�wI,I1�., �lJ��. ' --- i� _�•�'�a.,j��(_�.. �,_. �� _ .. _ _ � - • • � �� • � ' � ' ' � � - • . �� . : �� . � � • � •:� •• •-� � � . � •- •- � �. � III � � - � , � . � � . ��.�� ;: _ , ,. . .: _, . , , . , ,, . , , APPENDIX A $ i; � ( � � � � � � � � � � i S � � i � � � � � � � � ; � k � �� !� � � � � � � � , !,� � � APPENDIX A , LIMITATIONS/TERMS & CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT ' ' ' � ' ' ' ' 1 1 1 ' SITE ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS � 1. The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated therein. The conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of ' described services or the time and budgetary constraints imposed by Client. The work described in this report was carried out in accordance with the attached Terms and Conditions. , 2. In preparing this report, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has relied on certain information provided by state and local oFficials and other parties referenced therein, t and on information contained in the files of state and/or local agencies available to GZA at the time of the site assessment. Although there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by these various sources, GZA did not ' attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this site assessment. ' 3. In the event that bank counsel or title examiner for Client obtains information on environmental or hazardous waste issues at the site not contained in this report, such , information shall be brought to GZA's attention forthwith. GZA will evaluate such information and, on the basis of this evaluation, may modify the conclusions stated in this report. ' 4. Observations were made of the site and of structures on the site as indicated within the report. Where access to portions of the site or to structures on the site was ' unavailable or limited, GZA renders no opinion as to the presence of hazardous material or oil, or to the presence of indirect evidence relating to hazardous material or oil, in that portion of the site or structure. In addition, GZA renders no opinion t as to the presence of hazardous material or oil, or to the presence of indirect evidence relating to hazardous material or oil, where direct observation of the interior walls, floor, or ceiling of a structure on a site was obstructed by objects or , coverings on or over these surfaces. 5. Unless otherwise specified in the report, GZA did not perform testing or analyses to determine the presence or concentration of asbestos or polychlorinated biphenyls ' (PCB's) at the site or in the environment at the site. , 6. Tt�e purpose of this report was to assess the physical characteristics of the subject site with respect to the presence in the environment of hazardous material or oil, as defined in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 21E. No specific attempt was made ' LIMITENV.SA (1/1/91) PAGE 1 ' ' 1 I' ' to check on the wmpliance of present or past owners or operators of the site with federal, state, or local laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise. i ' 7. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon the data obtained from a limited number of soil and/or groundwater samples ' obtained from widely spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between these explorations may not become evident until further exploration. If variations or other latent conditions then appear evident, it will be ' necessary to reevaluate the conclusions and recommendations of this report. 8. Water level readings have been made in the test pits, borings, and/or observation , wells at the times and under the conditions stated on the test pit or boring logs. However, it must be noted that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall and other factors different from those prevailing at the ' time measurements were made. 9. Except as noted within the text of the report, no quantitative laboratory testing was I ' performed as part of the site assessment. Where such analyses have been conducted by an outside laboratory, GZA has relied upon the data provided, and has not conducted an independent evaluation of the reliability of these data. , 10. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon various types of chemical data and are contingent upon their validiry. These I ' data have been reviewed and interpretations made in the report. As indicated within the report, some of these data are preliminary "screening" level data, and should be confirmed with quantitative analyses if more specific information is necessary. I ' Moreover, it should be noted that variations in the types and concentrations of contaminants and variations in their flow paths may occur due to seasonal water table fluctuations, past disposal practices, the passage of time, and other factors. ' Should additional chemical data become available in the future, these data should be reviewed by GZA and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein , modified accordingly. 11. Chemical analyses have been performed for specific parameters during the .course , of this site assessment, as described in the text. However, it should be noted that additional chemical constituents not searched for during the current study may be present in soil and/or groundwater at the site. ' 12. It is recommended that GZA be retained to provide further engineering services during construction and/or implementation of any remedial measures recommended ' in this repori. This is to allow GZA to observe compliance with the concepts and recommendations contained herein, and to allow the development of design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated. ' LIMITENV.SA (1/1/91) PAGE 2 , 1 ' ' File No. 13172.10 ' TERMS & CONDITIONS OF ENGAGEMENT ' The Terms and Conditions and the "Proposal" dated. February 1. 1993 , submitted by GZA GeoEnvironmental. Inc. ("we" or "us") to Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. ("you"),make up the "Agreement" between us. THESE TERMS CONTAIN LIMITATIONS IN OUR ' LIABILIT'Y TO YOU, AND OTHERS, FOR ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OUR SERVICES: , 1. SERV[CES: THE "SERV[CES" FOR THE RE'I�AIN ALL OUR RIGHTS AND CLAIMS. . IF ANY "PROJECT", "SI1'E" AND ANY OTHER CONSULTING STATE IMPOSES A SERVICE, SALES OR SIMILAR TAX SERVICES WE YtAY PERFORM REFFRRED TO IN OUR ON OUR SERVICES,YOU WILL PAY THAT TAX AS AN ' PROPOSAL WILL BE PERFORMED EOR YOUR ADDITIONAL ITEM ON OUR IWOfCES. EXCLUSIVEUSE. OURSERV[CFSADDRESSCURRENT IF WE TERMINATE SERVICES BECAUSE OF CONDIT70NS. ANYDELAYEDUSF., OFTHERESULTS NON-PAYMENT,YOUWILLPAYUSFORALLSERV[CFS ' . OF OUR SERVICES WILL REQ[.9RF. UPDATES. YOU AND EXPENSES, ACCORDING TO THE AGREEMENT, ACKNOWLEDGE, BY ENTF,RWG INTO THIS THROUGHTHETERMINATIONDATE,PLUSEXPENSES ' AGREEMENT, THE INHERENT RISKS AND OF TERMINATION, INTEREST AND COSTS OF UNCERTAINTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLECCION,INCLUDINGREASONABLEATTORNEY'S INVF.,STIGATTON OF SUBSURFACE CONDITTONS FOR FEES. ANY OBIECTION TO AN INVOICE MUST BE ' CONSTRUCI70N PURPOSES AND ASSESSMENT OR MADE BY YOU, IN WRITING, WITHIN"PEN (10) DAYS, REMEDIATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES. YOU OR"CHE OBJECTION WILL BE WAIVED. HAVE BEEN ADVISED, AND ACICNOWLEDGE, 'I"IIAT 3. INSURANCE: WE �IAINTAIN THE ' OUR DECISIONS ARE JUDGME!VCS BASED UPON FOLLOW[NGINSURANCE: WORKERSCOMPENSATION LIMITED DATA RATHER "S'1-IAt�' UPON SCIENTIFIC WITH STATUTORILY REQUIRED LIMITS; FACC. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILIT'P; AUTO- ' ?. PAYMENT: INVOICESWILLBESUBMI'I"I'ED MOBILE (VARIOUS COVERAGES); PROFESSIONAL TO YOU MONT'f[LY, OR SEMI-MONTIILY. AT OUR LIABILITY, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAIRMENT LIA- � D[SCRE;TION. PAYMENT IS DUF WI'CHIN THIRTY (30) BILITY AND COiVTRACTORS POLLUTION LIABILITY. DAYSFROMIWOICEDATE. ANIWOICEREMAINING WE FURVISIT YOU CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE UNPAID AFTER THIRTY (30) DAYS WILL BEAR UPON YOUR REQUEST. � ' INTEREST AT THE LESSER OF THE MAXIMUM OUR LIABILCI'Y FOR CLAIMS AND EXPENSES LAWFUL ANNUAL INTERESI' RA7'E OR 1-1/2% PER [S LIMITED TO THE AMOUNTS, LIMITS, EXCLUSIONS MONTH. IF YOU DO NOT PAY AN [NVOICE W[THIN AND CONDI"I70NS OF THE INSURANCE MAINTAINED ' THIRTY (30) DAYS, WE MAY, THF,RE.4FCER ON TEN BY US. A SEPARATE LIMCT OF OUR LIABILTCY FOA (10) DAYS PRIOR WRI'["I'EN NOT7CE, ELECT TO NEGLIGENT PROFESSIONAL ACTS, ERRORS OR ' TE(L�IINATE ALL FURTHER SERVICES. W[THOUT OMISSIONS OR BREACH OF CONTRACI'IS SET OUT IN INCURRING ANY LIABILITY TO YOU. ON SECTION 15. WE WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TERMINATION OF SERVICES FOR NON-PAYMENI',WE CLAIMS CAUSED BY YOUR NEGLIGENCE OR BY THAT ' ' (5/92-E Edition) Copyright� 1993 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Page 1 of 5 ' � - ' OF ANY PERSON OR EN'ITTY POR WHOSE CONDUCI' GIVE US AW PLANS AND OTHER INFOILb1ATION IN WE ARE NOT LEGA[,LY LIAl1L[. YOU MAY ELECTTO YOUR POSSESSION COtiCERtiING THE SITE. ON NON- ' APPLY FOR HIGHER INSURANCE COVERAGES OWNED SITES, YOli WILL REQUEST UTfUTY THROUGH PROIECT-SPECIFIC I�SURANCE. IP LOCATIONS AND OTHER PLANS FROM SITE OWNER PROJECT INSURANCE IS PROVIDFD. YOU WILL PAY AND PROVIDE THEM TO US. IP, DESPITE ALL SUCH ' THE ENTIRE PREMIUM COST. AVAILABLE PLANS AND INFOR�b1AT10N.ALL UNDER- 4. RIGHT OF ENI'RY: YOU HAVE GNEN US GROUND Ii�1PROVEMEYI'S CANNO"1' BE LOCATED, THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPOV THG SITE SO"CI-fAT WE THERE IS SOME RISK TO YOU OF UA!�IAGETO THESE ' AND OUR CONSULTANTS AND SUBCONTRACCORS IMPROVEMENTS. YOUAGREETOACCEPTTHERISKS CAN PERFORM I30RINGS. SCUDIPS, EXPLORATIONS OF DAMAGE AND EXPENSE ASSOCIATED WITH ' AND, IF SPECIF7ED, REMEDIA'PIO\ WORK. IF ANY REPAIR OR RFSTORATION OF AW IMPROVEMENTS SERVICES AAE TO BE CARRIP_D OUT ON PROPERTY NOT DISCLOSED BY PLANS AND INFORMATION � OR FACILCITES NOT OWNED OR OCCliP1ED DY YOU. PROVIDED TO US BY THOSE SOURCES. , YOU REPRESENT TO US TIiA"I' TF[E OWNER AND 6. SAMPI.ES/MA�9FFSTS: U\`LESS YOU GIVE OCCUPANT HAVE GIVEN YOU PF,RMISSION FOR US US WRITTEN INSTRUCI'IONS PRIOR TO OUR BEGIN- TOENI'ERAND PERFORMTHF..SFRVICESUnDERTHE NWG FIELD WORK, WE WILL DISPOSE OF ALL SOIL, ' CONDCI'[ONS STATED IN SELTIO\'S. YOU WILL GNE ROCK.WATERAND A.�'Y OTHERSAMPLESTHIRTY(30) US REASONABLE EVIDENCF. CONFIRMING SUCH DAYS AFTER WE SUBMIT OUR INITIAL REPORT. PER'�IISSION, IF REQUESTED. IF AI�Y SAMPLFS CONTAIN HAZARDOUS , 5. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS: SU6STANCFS. WE WILL DISPOSE OF THOSE (A) NORMAL DISTURBANCE - EQUIP- (1)THROUGH A QUALIF[ED WASTE DISPOSAL ' MENTUSEDINPERFORMINGOURSERVICESWILL,TO CONTRACTOR,OR(?)UPONYOURTIb1ELYWRITTEN - SOME DEGREE, AFFCCT. ALTER OR DAMAGE THE INSTRUCI'ION, WE WILL SHIP THEM BY A L[CENSED SITE SURFACES, BUILDWGS. STRUCTURES, TRANSPORTER TO A LICENSED DISPOSAL FACILI"IY. ' VEGETATION. FACILITIES AND SUBSURFACE IFYOUGiVEUSTIMELYWRITTENINSTRUCTIONSTO INSTALLATIONS(COLLECTIVF,LY "IMPROVEMENI'S"). RETAIN SAbfPLES BEYOND SUCH THIRTY (30) DAYS, YOU ACCEPT SUCH RISKS. WE WILL EXERCISE WEWILLARRANGETOSTORETHEMFORYOU. YOU ' REASONABLE CARE TO LI�11T SUCH DAMAGE. WILL PAY US OUR ADDITIONAL STANDARD HOWBVER, WE DO VOT L`�DERTAKE THE LABORATORY FEES FOR OUR STORAGE AND � RESTORATTON OF SUCH DAb1AGE. ANY COSCS OF TRA�'SPORT OF SAMPLES W ACCORDANCE WITH � RESTORATION OF IMPROVEMENTS W[LL BE DOILVE YOURINSTRUCTIONS. WEDO NOTUNDERTAKEANY BY YOU. THEY HAVE NOT AEEN INCLUDED IN OUR RESPONSIBILITY OR L[ABILITY FOR TRANSPORT OR ' FEES OR PRICES. DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES. (B) UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMEiVTS- WE WILL VOT. UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. SIGN WE WILL EXERCISE REASONABLF,CARE IN SEEKING M.4NIFFSCS FOR SUCH SUBSTANCES. YOU AGREE ' TO LOCATE UNDERGROUNDIMPROVEMEMS. WE THAT WE ARE NOT A HANDLER, GENERATOR. WILL CONTACT THE LOCAL PU6LIC AGENCIFS OR OPERATORTRFATERORSTORER,TRANSPORTEROR pRiVATE FIRMS, IF ANY, WHICH COORDWATE DISPOSER OE HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES . ' SUBSURFACE UT7LITY INFOIL'bWT10N ANU WILL FOUK'U OR IDENTIFIED AT A SITE. ANY REQUIRED REV[EW PLANSAND DATA WHICI�ITHEY NROVIDE I�' ARRAVGEMENTS FOR TRANSPORT. TREATMENT, ' - RESPONSE TO OUR INQUIRIES. YOU liNDERTAKE TO STORAGE Ai 1D DISPOSAL OF SUCH SUBSTANCES � (5/92-E Edition) Page 2 of 5 ' ' ' (INCLUDING SAMPLES NOT SO RBMOVED) WILL BE FURNISHED BY US WHICH ARE NOT PAID FOR MADE BY OTHERS IN THEIR NAME. PURSUANT TO OLR INVOICES WILL BE RETURNED ' DEFIN[TTONOF"HAZARDOUSSUBSTANCFS": TO US, ON OUR REQULST, AND WILL NOT•BE USED MATERIALS,POLLUTANTSORASBFSCOS,WHICHARE BY YOU OR ANY OTHERS FOR ANY YURPOSE. THE � A DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH. SAFETY OR THE REPORTSANDOTHERMATERL4L5 WEPREPAREARE � ' ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING SURSTANCES DEFINED NOT SUITABLE FOR LATER AEUSG BY YOU OR INTHE FEDERAL WATER POLLI,'7'ION CONTROLACT: OTHERS ON THE PROJECT, ANY EXTENSION, OR FEDERAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL OTHER SI'I'ES OR PROJECTS, NOR AT FUTURE TIMES ' RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT NOT CONTEMPLATED BY Olift REPORTS. IF YOU (CERCLA); RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND REUSEANY'I'IIINGWEPREPARE,ORIFOTHERSSEEK RECOVERY ACT AND IN STATF.. AND LOCAL LAWS, TO USE THEM, IT WILL BE AT YOUR, AND THEIR, , CODES AND REGULATIONS. SOLE RISK, WITHOUT LIABILIT'Y ON OUR PART. W 7. CONSTRUCI70N06SF,RVATIONSERVICES: CASE OF SUCH UNAUTHORIZED RE-USE, YO[J WILL , IF OliR SERVICES INCLUDE OBSERVATION OF HOLD US HAR�ILFSS FOR ALL CLAIMS. CONSTRUCTION ON A SITE. WF, WILL CARRY OUT 9. DISCLOSUREOFHAZARDS: TAKINGINTO OUR OBSERVATION IN ACCORDAIVCE WITH� ACCOUYC THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE US,WE ' GENERALLY ACCEPCED PROFFSSIONAL PRACI7CFS WILL TAKE REASONABLE PRECAUTIONS FOR THE OF SIMILAR ENGINEERS AND CONSULTA�I'I'S. OUR HEALTHANDSAFEIYOFOURPERSONNELWHILEAT � SERVICFS WILL NOT[NCLUDE ANY SUPERVISION OF THE SIT"E. BEFORE YOU DIRECT US TO PAOCEED ' ANY CONTRACTOR OR SUACONTRACCOR OTHER WiTH OUR SERVICES, YOU WILL GIVE US ANY "I'FIANOUROWN. YOURCONTRA(TORWILLRE�b1AIN INFORMATION W YOUR POSSESSION REGARDING � SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXISIENCE OF ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES , ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE BY IT, AND ITS UNDER OR ADJACENT TO THE 9TE. THIS WCLUDES - ' SUBCONTRACTORS, AND CONTRACT PLA�S, ALL PERMITS, �L4NIFESTS AND AVY RECORDS OF � � SPEC[FICATIONS AND SAFE'IY REQUIRLMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE. OR NON-COMPLIANCE, WITH LAW. IF ALL SITE WORKING CONDITtONS. AND SAFETY YOli, YOUR COUNSEL OA ANY OTHER OF YOUR ' REQUIREMENTS, DAY AND \9GHT, FOR BOTH REPRESENTATIVES FAIL TO FURNISH US WITH SUCH PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THPSE INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION, TO THE EXTENT IT IS IN YOUR ' OSHA,NIOSH,U.S.EPA AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE POSSESSION.AND THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF SUCH I GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. OUR HAZARDOUSSUBSTANCESISNOTDISCLOSEDINTHE OBSERVATIONSANDMOMTORINGSERVICESDO�'OT INFORMATION YOU PROVIDE TO U5, YOU WILL BE � INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE RFSPONSIBLE TO US,AND TO ANY CLAIMANTS, FOR , ' COv"I'RACTOR'SHEALTHANDSAFEI'YMEASURESAT NROPERTY DAMAGES AND COVSEQUEtiTIAL OR tiEAR THE CONSTRUCI70N 511'E. DAMAGFS.AS SPELLED OUT IN SECI70N 14 AND FOR . 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: ANYCLAIMS,DEMANDS,SUITSANDLIABILITIESFOR ' EVERY"I'FIWG WE PREPARE, AS INSTRUMENTS OF PERSONAL INIURY, DISEASE, MEDICAL EXPENSFS SERVICE,WHEI'HER REPORTS, BORING LOGS, FIELD (INCLUDING HEALTH MONITORING AND DEATH . DATA AND NOTES,LABORATORY TESCS AND DATA, CLAfMS). CALCULATTONS, ESCIMATES OR OTHER DOCU- l0. UNANTICIPATED HAZARDOUS . ' MENTS OR MEMORANDA. WILL REMP.IN OUR SOLE MATERIAIS: IF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, NOT � PROPERTY. REPORTS AND OTHER WORK PRODU(.T ANTICIPATED IN 'CHE SCOPE OF WORK, WHICH ARE ' (5/92-E Edition) Page 3 of 5 ' , ' ' A THF2EAT TO HEALTFI. SAFETY OR THE INCURItED, PROVIDED THAT OUR DISCLOSURE IS ENVIRONMENTARLENCOU�vTrREDINTHECOCJRSE �fADEUNDERAREASONABLFBONAFIDEBELIEF.OR ' OFOURSERVICFS,WECANSUSPF,NDOURSERVICES. ON ADVICE OF COUNSEL, THAT DISCLOSGRE IS WE WILL COOPERATE WITH ypU W ORDER TO REQUIRED BY LAW. WORKOUTMU"PUALLYSATISFACPORYREVISIONSTO 13. 5"CA�DARD OF CARE: WE SHALL. lN ' THE SCOPE OF WORIC. ESTIMATBD COST AND TIME PERFOR'NING OUR SERVICES, EXERCISE THE SAME NOW IN OUR AGREEMENT TO FIT TIiE CO�DITIONS. DBGREE OF CARE AND SKILL ORDINARILY IF WE DO� NOT REACH MUTUAL AGREEME�T ON EXBRCISED UNDER SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES BY ' SUCH REVISIONS. WE CAN 'PERiNINATE OUR QUALIFIED PAOFESSIO�'ALS AND CONSULTAV"CS SERVICES ON GIVING YOU TFN (10) DAYS WRITTEN UNDERTAKING SIMILAR WORK IN THE SAME NOTICE. YO[I WILL PAY US POR ALI,SERVICES AND LOCALITY A1'THATTIME. SUBSEQUEN'ILY EVOLVED , EXPENSES THROUGH TERMINATION DATE Iti STANDARDS WILL NOT DE APPLIED W JUDGING OUR � ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGRF.P.MENT,W THE CASE WORK. WE �L4KE ONLY THIS AND NO OTHER , OF SUCH TERMIIJAT[ON. WARRAN"IY OR REPRESE�'TATIO\, EXPRESS OR ll. CONFIDENTIALITY: WE WII,L �\'OT I.�IPLIED. WE WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR 'CHE DISCLOSE INFORMATION APOUT THE AGRFFMENT, IMI'Ef2PR6TATION, BY OTHERS, OF DATA OR , OUR SERVICES OR OUR REPORTS TO AWONE INFOILWITION WE DEVELOP. EXCEI'T ON YOUR WRITI'EN INSTRUCTIONS. IF YOU 14. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS: BY PROVIDE ti5 WITH CONFIDF,!�TIAL INFORMATION AUTHORIZINGUSTOPROCEEDWITHTHESERVICFS, ' ABOUT YOUR BliSINESS. W£ WILL KEEP THAT YOU CONFIRbI THAT WE HAVE N01' CRFATED NOR [NFOR�I.4T[ON CONFIDEI�'TIAL FXCEP"I' TO THE CONTRII3UTED TO THE PRFSE\'CE OF Ai�'Y ' EXTENT NECESSARY FOR (1) US TO PERFORM OUR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OR CONDITIONS AT OR SERV[CES (2) TO COMPLY WI'CII PROF655IONAL NEAR 1'HE SITE. IN SEEKING OUR SERVICES TO STANDARDS TO PROTECT PUI3LIC HEALTH, SAPETY ASSIST YOli IN DEALING WITH THE CONDITIONS , AND THE ENVIRONMENT AND (3)TO CO�IPLY WITH EXISTING AT THE SITE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, GOVERNMLN'CAL REGULATIONS AND COURT DURING THE COURSE OF OUR SERVICES. WE MAY ORDERS WF02MATION WIIICH IS KNOWN TO THE NOT HAVE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY, OR OTHER , PUBLIC,TECHNICAL INFORMATTON WH[CH WE MAY LIABILITY INSURANCE, OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE DEVELOPED INDEPENDEI�'TI,Y OR ACQUIRLD OBTAIN SUCH INSURANCE AT REASONAB[.E COST WITHOUT BREACH OF ANY DUTY. WII,L NOT BE COVERING CLAIb1S [WOLVINO THE ACTUAL OR ' CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL. POTENI'IALPRESENCEOFHAZARDOUSSI,BSTANCES. 12. DISCLOSURE: IF[3Y ORDER OF COURT. TIiE COMPENSATION TO BE PAID TO US FOR OUR ' OR GOVERN�tENTAL LAW OR REGULATIOtiS. � SERVICES, AND OliR POTENTIAL PROFIT, [S ("ORDERS"). WE ARE REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE DISPROPORTIONAI,LY SMALL IN RELATION TO THE INFORMATIONINOURPOSSESSION,WESHALLGNE POTEYI7ALRISKOFINJURY.LOSSORDAMAGEFROM , YOU PROMPTNOTICEOFSUCH FACTS.THE2EAFCER. A RELEASE OF OR EXPOSURE TO SUCH SUBSTANCES _ WE MAY, WITHOUT LIADILITY TO YOU OR OTHERS, OR CONDITIONS. COMPLYWITHSUCHORDFRS. IFANYCLAIMSARE IN ACK\'OWLEDGEMENT OF THE � ' ASSERTED AGAINST US 13ECAUSE OF OUR I�IBALANCE BETWFEN OUR BENEFII�S AND RISKS, COMPLIANCE.YOli WILL HOI.D US FIARMLESS FROM YOU AGREE TO HOLD US, AND EACH OF OUR SUCH CLAIMS AND RF.ASO\ADLE EXPENSE CONI'RA(TORS, SURCO�"I'RACiORS. CONSULTANTS. � , ' (5/92-E Edition) Page 4 of 5 ' ' ' AGENTS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AW EMP[.OYEES, TIiE ADD1170NAI. CI�TARGE SERVP_S AS � HARMLFSS AGAINST ALL CIAIMS FOR DAMAGFS, CONSm8RAT70N POR OUR UNDBATAKQVG 'lIQ3 ' DIRECT OR CONSEQUEMIIAL; ALL EXPENSES,COSTS GRFATERRISKQJVOLVEDINPERFOR7�4NGSERVICPS OF EVERY KIND. DIRECC OR INDIRECT, LEGAL OR PORYODUNDBRANINCRPnSEDl.A1CCOFLW1I1.1"['Y � OTFIERWISE IN COIVNECI70N W1TH A RELEASE OF I'OR DAMAGBS ABOVE ZS0,000. ' HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES: RODILY INJURY. - ' DISABILITY,DEATN.MEDICAL EXPENSES,PROPERTY �CRFASED LUf�� a��?N�� OF LIAIIQ.RY ADDITIONAL MUST DAMAGE AND OTHF,R EXPFNSFS AND ECONOMIC AOR DAMAGES FE:E IM1W, ' LOSS, ALLEGED TO HAVE [IF.GN CAUSED BY TIiE 5,�� $1,000 RELEASE, REMOVAL, REMF.nIAL ACI'ION OR , INVESIIGATION OF FIAZARDnUS SUBSTANCES; AND 5100'000 2'000 ANY ASSESSMENT OF Ff[VES OR PE\ALTIES RELATED TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OR TFIEIR YOUAGREE'I7IATYOURPAYMP.NPOP7'FIE� . ' REMEDIATION. ADDI170NALF8EDOPSNOTCANS'[T1lTI8ACIIARGB YOUR OBLIGATIONTO INDEMNIFY US DOES �R PIACF3ME?NI' OP ADDf170NA[. PROI�SSIONAI. NOT APPLY TO CI,AIMS. DAMAGES, LOSSFS OR LW6IL11'Y INSURANCE � RELEASES AND EXPOSURE TO POLLUTANTS WHICH �6. GOVERNING LAW; SEVERABILITY ARE ADIUDICATED TO HAVE RFSULTED FROM OUR �IODIFICATIONS: ASSIGNMENT: THIS AGREEMENT GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLPUL MISCONDUCC fI�' SHALL BE GOVERNED AND ENFORCEABLE IN , OUR PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES. ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MASSACHUSEI'I'S, 15. LIMITATION OP PROPP_SSIONAL THE SCATE IN WHICH OUR PRINCIPAL OFFICE IS ' LVaBII.1TY: YOU AGRLB'Il1AT YOUR AGGRF3GATE LOCATED,WHICH SHALL BE DEEMED THE PLACE OF MAJQN4UMRECOVERYAGAINSCUSPORANYCIAIMS CO\'1'RACI'ING. BASBD ON THE PBRFORMANCE OF OUR THEPROVISIONSOFTHISAGREEMENTARE ' PROPF_SSIONAI.SERVICFS,W�I�IEI7IER QJ CONI'RACf, SEVERABLE. THE [WALIDITY OF ANY PROVISION TORTORO'171F:RWISB,ISIlM�IPD7'O'171HGRPATER SHALL NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY AND OF �50,000 OR 'I7iE AMOUNP OF FEFS PAID TO US ENFORCEABIWTY OFA�'Y OTHEAPROVISIONS. TI{IS ' WI'I7IRPSP8CTT07'[IISAGRA.PMINI'. AGREEMENT, MADE UP OF OUR PROPOSAL AND WE SHALL NOT BE I.IAI3I.E ON ANY HASIS THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, CANIJOT BE POR YOUR IASS ON PRORfIS, DFL1Y,DAMAGPS OR MODIFIED ORALLY. OR BY ANY COURSE OF , ANYSPEC7AI.ORCONSEQUF3KI7ALDAMAGFSOFANY CONDUCC, AND SHALL COI�'TROL OVER ANY WCONSISTENT OR CONTRARY PROVIS[ONS W AW "IYPE. � YOU MAY E[.ECT 7'O INCRFl�SE TFIB LIM�I' PROPOSAL.CONTRACl'FORM,PURCHASE ORDER OR . OF LIABILCIY FOR DAMAGPS,UP TO 5100,q10,IF YOU OTHER DOCUMENT ISSUED BY YOU. THESE TERMS DOTHLFOLLOWING: INDICAT[?IlE?IAW'f7�IATYOU ANDCONDf170N55HALLSURVIVETHECO�IPLETION, , ELP.CI' TO INCRPASH '[71E I.[ARP TO ONL OF 1}B OR TERMINATION. OF OUR SERVICES FOR THE LEVEIS DFSIGNAIED BE[AW AND PAY 'IIIE PROJECT. ANY ASS[GNMENT OF YOUR RIGHTS ADDITTONAI.FfsESHOWNOPP0.STIE'17�QVf.RL'4SED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES OUR PR10R ' I.EVEL, PAYMENC '('O DE MADI? SIMUI.TAM'AUSLY W�TrEN CONSENT. WI'IH 1'f-fE F.XE?CUIlON OF TIIIS AGRIi[?MENC. ' ' (5/92-E Edition) Page 5 of 5 ' APPENDIX B I _ � . ; . k t ( I f 'I i ' I i i I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � � � , � � . -.r ' , APPENDIX B � SANBORN HISTORICAL MAPS , � � � , , � � ' , t APPENDIX C , i t � � � i � r � � � � � �l � � � � � � � � � � ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' APPENDIX C ' DEP INFORMAT'ION: EXCERPT FROM DEP'S May 1993 "LIST OF CONFIRMED DISPOSAL SITES AND LOCATIONS TO BE INVESTIGATED" ' ' ' ' 1 , 1 ' 1 ' , � BUREAU OF WASTE SffE CLEANUP _ -,—_ -, ._-__-_.. . --.---p€�R�M:N�-QF-€N1�1A01�lt�AI�AL-P�iO.�rCS1OAl--- � EX�CUTIVE OFFIC� OF ENVIRONM�NTAL AF�AIRS , : COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSTfS ' � � . :, _ � . LIST OF � D DISPOSAL SITES . , , CONFIRME AND � �.00ATfONS TO BE INVESTiGaTED 1 ; . � . ' October 1992 , _ 1 , SUSAN =. i!=-Nc`' DC:N1=_ S. G~==h'^Ut:� J�+t.1_S C. C�-tJ��=,n ASSISTAP'— ^OMMlSSIOt�=rZ- a� . � ., �- --�,_.• c�r:sr�,.ssi�r.== D�vsc . _cr� ; � __-. . �=� � �� . � . c.-.e:_. �__,� nPC:-BC =J" - , , . ' Commonweotth of Massachusetts ' Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Department of . � � ' Envi�onmental Protect�on Wlliam F. WeIE , Gwmna Daniel S.Gree�Oaum Co,�m�:swne� , October 15, 1992 ' Dear Interested Party: , Con�amination from nil and hazardous materials can endanger people, propercy and che environment . The longer a disposal site remains unattended, ' thP more likely it is that contamination will spread, dangers will increase, . and cleanup costs will escalate . ' The Stace Superfund Law (Chapter 21E of the Massachusetts General Laws, enac[ed in 1983) , provided che Deparcment of Environmental Protection (DEP) �aich authority and some resources to attack the problems caused by uncontrolled siLes . The Occober 15 , 1992 List of Confirmed Disnosal Sites and ' Locations to be Investieaced documencs DEP's progress on investigating, assessing. and cleaning up disposal sices as of Occober 1 , 1992 . This report shows that , nearl}' nine years after the Stace Superfund Law was enacted, there ' are no�.: more chan 5,600 sites and potential sices in the system - - a four- fold increase since 1987 , when DEP firsc starLed publishing lists of confirmed and suspected sites . ' Cleanup work has been compleced a� 266 sites , and is underway (wi[h DEP o:ersighc or with � w�i��zr of DEP's apptio�'als) at 278 of the locations with confirmed or suspec:�d problems sta;.�-wide . In addi[ion, there are an unknown , nwnber of additional si:es [o be iden[ified. Most of the sites at Nhich progress has been made are being cleaned up ' by che potencially responsible parcies . However, no work is being done at more than 708 of identified si[es and locations , because the potentially responsible parcies have failed to acc and DEP does not have enough staff to. work on more than a few sites at one time. This situation demonstrates the ' u'itical need to s[reamline ihe 21E program. ' Since July 1990, DEP has been working with parcies affecced by this , program to develop recoininendations for improvements. The legislature is now considering further amendments co Chapter 21E which would: , ' One Win�er Street • Boston,Massachusetts 02108 � • FIU((617) 556 1049 • Telephone.(617)292•5500 . ' ' ' 2 �--. i ' . encourage private seccor cleanup by establishing clear responsibility and incentives for timely cleanups (by reducing the number of DEP ' approvals required in most cases and by relying on opinions provided by professionals licensed by the Commonwealth to manage response actions) , and ' . focus DEP's resources on activities where they are most needed, including sice discovery, overseeing cleanups, cleaning up sites � where �he privace sector is unable or unwilling co act, and developing clear and prac[ical s[andards and guideiines for responding �to releases of oil and hazardous materials. ' These program improvements would allow assessment and cleanup to proceed at three [imes as manl' sices as in [he current system and remove many of the ' roadblocks that no�a prevent prompt responses to contamination. ]986 amer.dinents [o !�1.G. L. c . 21E established specific requirements for � ' progress on invescigating. assessing, and cleaning up disposal sites. In 1987 �he Legislacure au[horized 519 staff positions to implement chis more ambi�ious prograni. Ho�aever , due to budget restrictions , only 212 positions ;r� c��rr�ntl� fill�d ?s a rzs�.�lt , the 21E program is no[ fully staffed, and ' DEP has no� been able co meec the requirements of the law. However, some progress has been made : ' . A preliminnry assessmen[ must be completed within one year of each locacion's lis�ing, co decermine the need for further investigation. , Pteliminar�• assessmen[s were compleced for 61 of the 133 locations first lisred on .Gc[ober 1� . 1991 . , . Foc each locacion �:srranting furcher investiga[ion, a sice invescigation inus; be rc�u.�.'. �d .:itl,iu �.:o yEars of che initial listing, and each � confirmed disposal sice mus[ be classified as a "prioriiy" or "non- , prioricy" sice . Of the 208 sites and locations initially listed on October 15 . 199U, 87 ha��e been investigated and classified. ' . For each confirmed prioricy disposal site , a feasible permanent remedy inust be coinpleted within four years of its initial liscing. If a permanen� remed�� is no� feasible , an initial remedial response action , must be completed anc, '� plan for implementing permanent remedial measures must be developed. Of the 401 locacions to be investigated lis[ed on Occober 15 , 1988, 24 have become confirmed priority disposal ' - sices and 3 remedial accions have been compleied. � � ' , . ' ' 3 ' , Today' s report , published in accordance with Chapter 21E and the Massachuseccs Goncingency Plan (310 CMR 40.00) , updates liscs printed in 3uly ' 1992 , and contains �he following lists: . MASTER INDEX: an index of all locations and disposal sites (5,637 locations and sites from all lists, 153 added this -quarter) ' . REMEDIAL: sites at which a remedial accion has been completed and for which no further actions are planned (266•sites , none added this ' quarter) - . CONFIRMED: sices whzre releases of oil and/or hazardous materials have been confirmed and which require further action (1,709 si[es, SO added ' this quarcer) _- . . I:AI�'EP.: confirmed non-priority sites where DEP has authorized a privat� ' par[y eo proceed �aich cleanup actions wichout further DEP oversight (888 sices , 50 addzd this quarter)� ' . DELETED: locr,[ions which are noc disposal sites , or where informatian e�iscs which indicaLes chat no further assessment or cleanup action is . warranied ( 1�8 locstions , . 3 were added this quarter) , . LOCATIONS TG BE I"i\'ESTIGATED: loca�ions che DEP considers reasonably ] ikel�� to be� dispos<;I si �e.=. (2 . 616 locations , 97 added ihis quarcer) , This report upd�:as lis�s chat were published on February 24 , 1992, and con.ains an Erraca Shee: which shows 2 errors or duplicate listings that appeared in �he Julv 1992 reporc . ' For more informacion about the indieidual sites and locations contained ir. this reporc or DE?' s or.-going eiforts co improve the 21E program, please contacc : DEP, Bureau of 1,'25LA Site Cleanup, Public Participation Branch, One ' l;incer Scree� . �ch Floor . Boscon. ^lassachusetts 02108 (617/292-5820) . Thank .:ou for �:our incere:s: . i ' 1 . , , ' ' i ' ' . TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Pa�e Number ' I . MASTER INDEk - Description of che Master Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MAS-1 , Master Indes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MAS-3 - MAS-219 ' II . REMEDIAL: SITES AT WHICH A REMEDIAL ACTION HAS BEEN _ COMPLETED AND FOR WHICH NO FURTHER REMEDIAL ACTIONS ARE PLANNED , Description of the Remedial List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .REM-1 Remedial List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .REM-3 - REM-13 ' III . CONFIRPtED SITES WH�RE RELEASES .OF OIL AND HAZARDOUS - "tATERIALS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED AND WHICH ' P,EQI�IRE FI�RTHER ACTIG": Descr:p:ion of [he Confirmed Lisc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CON-1 , Confirmed Lisc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CON-5 - CON-256 I`.' ',1.4I`.'ER: CO�FIR"tED 10N-PRIORITT' SITES k'HERE PARTIES ' CO�DUCTING CLEANtiP HA�'E BEEN GRANTED A _ - �,�P.I\�ER OF DEPARTMENTAL OVERSIGHT ' Descripcion of the S.aiver List . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . .WAV-1 l:ai�•er Lis[ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .WAV•3 - WAV-37 ' DELETED: LGCP.T10:iS t:HICH ARE '�OT SITES OR WHERE IkFORL�.TIO� E�ISTS WHICH INDICATES NO FCRTHER :+CTIOV IS l�'�RRA�TED ' Descripcion of the Deleted List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DEL-1 � D�leced List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .DEL-3 - DEL-9 ' \'I . LOCATIONS 7'0 BE IIdVEST1GATED: ' Dc,scrip[ioii at t.l�e Loc�ciuns to be Investiga�ed Lisc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LTB-1 , Locstions to be Investigated List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LTB-3 - LTB-103 \�I1 . ERRATA SHEET: LOCATIONS ERRONEOUSLY LISTED IN THE PREVIOUS ANNUAL REPORT ' Description of the Erraca Shee� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . .ERR-1 ' Errsta Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ERR-3 "11.7 . 1'�DE\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INDEX-1 - INDEX-22 _ , ' tru�s-i - , DESCRIPTION OF THE MASTER INDEX This list is a master inder for all locations and sites in this report. � I[ is arranged alphabetically by [own and site name, and contains a � � compilation of all listings for the four lists described in section 310 CMR 40. 520 of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. It also identifies locations found on [he Waiver List and the Errata Sheet. ' All locacions and sices from the following lists are indexed: ' REMEDIAL: Sites at which remedial response actions have been completed � and for which further remedial response actions are unnecessary. ' CONFIRMED: Locations confirmed by the Department to be disposal sites, . ' and for. which remedial response action have not been completed. ' `�:=�.I':ER: Loc�cions confirmed by the Department to be non-priority disposal sites , and where an interested party has been � authorized to proceed through cleanup actions without . � Departmencal oversighc. DI[I.ETED: Locacions which are noc disposal sites or which are disposal � sites buc do not currently require further remedial response actions . ' 1..�1'. A. I . : - Locations to be invesiigaced, which are locations the Dcpartmer+: considers reasonably likely to be disposal sites but are as cer unconfirmcd. ' EitR.aTA' Loca[ions erroneouslv listed in the previous report . To locace informacion about a site or location on this list, look up the ' cicy or �own name in [hz Plaster Index and chen the sice locacion name . The ^':.;s�er Inde� also coneains the si�e number for each listing and the address on :ecord for che si[e or location. ' For more de[ailed information about a parcicular site or location, the Piascer Inder identifies the currenc list and page where the location or site, , is described. To find specific liscing information, look up the site or locacion on the page number of the individual lisc. For example , if a si.te is currencly listed as "confirmed" on page CON-7 , look on page seven of the Confirmed Site List to idencify more detailed information about the site. , The last column of the Master Index indicates whether a location or a site is "New to Book. " If a "1es" appears in this column, the listing is shown , ' for the first [ime on any lisc in [his report. ' � ' - Pepe: INS '1G7 � N 11 5 T E R I N D E % 0 F � L L 5 I T E 5 A N D L 0 C A T 1 0 N 5 . at�r is, �vsz � , s;ce -- so Tpm Muiber Mame Address ' Currently Listed On Pape Yodc _.._.."--^'--- -_"'- "'-""....."'-"'--^"'- ...__...--^---"'----...-- "--""'----_" """' "" , PALNER 1'0699 CXIAY'S OIL C0. BRIDGE AND IUIM STS. CONPIRMED COM -166 fes PALMER 1-0247 FOUR CORNERS SERV. STA. ItTE 181 i IUIN ST. CONFIRMED GDM '166 , PAIMER 1'0681 JARVIS E115T 127 Sd1TN W11N 5T. COMFIRXED CON -168 � OALMER 7-0141 M115S. CENTRAL RAILROAD BOSTpI RD. REMEDIAL Rpl - 9 � PALMER� . 1-0142 PRESIDENTIAL MGT. COQP. INPLE TREE IND.CTR(RTE 20) • L.T.B.1. LTB - 72 PALNER 7-0140 PROPERTY OFf RIVERYIE4 PKYY RIVERVIEY PKYY- COMFIRMED COM '166 ' PALMER 1•0143 PSC RESp1RCE5 � 10 YATER ST. fANFIRMED CON •16B ' PALMER 1-0325 RATHBONE CORP. 2<7 PARKER ST. REMEDIAL REN - 9 `, PALMER 1-0651 RATHBONE CORP./3 241 PARK 5T. CONFIRMED , COM -168 � PAIMER 1-0740 RAt KELIEY 8 SON il YATER ST. CONFIRMED CON -769 , PALMER 1-0686 SMOLl1 PRWERTY 75 NORTN ST. L.7.8.1. 1T8- - 72 ' PALMER 7-0469 TRIANGLE CASTING f0. 747 PALMER RD. L.T.B.I. LTB - R � PAIMER 1-OS4S YING MEMORIAL HOSPITAI YRIGHT ST. CONFtRMED CON.'169 , P11lMER 1-0776 NINTON'S F000 8 FUEL 239 PARK ST. CONFIRMED COM -169 . GALMER 1-0680 YANKEE COACM 311 VARK ST. DELETED DEL • 6 ', PEABODY 3-1565 BEST PETROLEUM 144 NEYBURY�ST.(RTE 1) L•T.B•I• LTB ' 72 PEABODY 3-1177 CALENDAR PRESS 28 YINTER 5T. 1.T.8.1. LTB -.TL ' . VEABODY 3-14G5 CENTENNIAL PARK CENTENNIAL DR. L.T.B.1. LTB - R PE�BODY 3-2763 CONMERLIAL PROVERTY 242-246 NEYBURY ST. L.T.8.1. LTB ' Tl � . PEABODY 3-3653 CdIMERL(�L PRWERTY 37 i05TER ST. YAIYER �� ' Z� PE�BODY 3-3002 Cp41ERClAI PROPERTY 161 LYNN ST L.T.B.I. LTB ' TL � ' PEABODY 3-2254 CUMBERLAND F11RM5 116 CENTRAL ST. L.T.B.L� LTB� - TL ' : PEABODT 3'1086 EASTMAN GELATIN CORP. 227 MASNINGTON � L.T.8.1. LTB - TL � PEABODY � 3-1377 EIIXON STATIpI 60 PROSPECT ST. ��R �� ' N' , PEABODT Y0766 FOREIGN CAR CEMTER 55-57 YALNUT ST. Li.B.I. LTB - TL PEABOOY 3-0722 FORMER�MIOCO A'629 137 NEYBURYPORT TRNPK MAIVER �� ' K , � � Cege: !US -748 - , - M A 5 T E R 1 N D E X 0 F A L L 5 I T E 5 � N D L 0 C � T 1 0 N S � October 75, 1992 �.� � Mcw , Slte to Tpm N�nbet Mame Ilddress Currmtly Listed On Ppe YoOk ""'-""""" -"'-- "'--""""-""""'-"" --'--""""""""""" """""""" •""-"' "'" ' VEABWY 3-3319 fORMER MiLL PROPERTIES 9 XOYLET ST. L.T.B.I. lT8 - 72 VE1180DY 3-3735 FURMITURE FREIGXT TERMINAL 65-67 FOSTER ST L.T.B.I. LTB - T2 , PEABODY 3-1703 GRIT i GREASE CNAMBER GROVE 5T. L.T.B.I. LTB - 72 � pEA80DC 3-1701 NENRY LEA�XER FOLNtTX ST. L.T.B.I. LTB - R , PEABODf 3-2880 NERIT�GE II�USTRIES � 22 FOSTER ST. L.T.B.I. LTB - T1 VEABODY 3-0948 MIGGINS SCXOOL 3 KIMG ST. LT.B.1. LTB - T2 ' PEABODY 3-37% INDUSTR(AL PRORERTIES 2 YEBSTER ST YAIVER WV - 24 ' VEABODY 3-2221 tNDUSTRIAI PROPERTY 4 8 5 LAKELAMD V�RK OR. V�IVER NAY - 24 '; PEABODY 3•1200 J.E.C. TANNING C0. 117 FOSTER ST. L.T.B.1. LTB • 72 ' PEABOOY 3-0407 l FINE C0. 143 LYNNFIELD 5T. L.T.B.1. LTB • 72 � PEABOOY 3-1018 LIDO SERVICE STATION 18 CEN7RAL ST. REMEDIAL REM • 9 ' PE11800Y 3-1544 MEINEKE MUFFLER 241 NEYBURt 5T. L.T.B.I. LTB - TL � PEABODY 3-2982 MELLO'S SERYICE STRTION 92 FOSTER ST. YAIVER Y�V - 24 ' PEABODY 3-2545 MOBIL GAS STATIpI 227 ANDOVER 5T. LONFIRMED LOM •169 CEAB�Y 3-2685 MICKS SERVILE CENTER 73 LYNN ST. COMFIRMED CON �169 ' PEABODY 3-1338 NORTN SNORE SXOVPING CENTER RTE 128 8 N4 LT.B.i. LTB - 72 _ PEABOOY 3-0411 Ol0 TANNERY(DICROCE) WINTER ST. REMEDIAL REM - 9 � PEABOOY 3-0577 PEABODY FIRE � 150 IUIN ST. L.i.B.l. LTB - T! PEABO�Y 3-1702 PEABODY UNDFILL FARN �VE. L.T.B.1. LTB - 7S ' PEABODY 3-3392 PEABODT MUNICIP�L U GHT 70 ENDICOTT ST. LT.B.I. LTB - 73 PEABODT 3-0406 P[ERPOINT PARK 15 PIERPoINT ST. REMEDI�L ' REM - 9 ' PEAB�Y 3-2763 VRESTIGE WLIERY 36 CEMTRAL ST. CONFIRMED CON �169 � PEABmY 5-0998 VROPERTY 24 YINTER ST. L.T.B.I. LTB - 7S PEABODY 3-01% PROPERTY 3 MASON ST. L.T.B.1. LTB - 73 � PE�BODY 3•1501 PROPERTY � 150-156 MAIM ST. L.T.B.I. � LTB ' 7S PEABODY 3-2G16 PROPERTY 90 NEWBURY ST. L.T.B.1. lT8 - 7S , � ' ' � vaae: �us -ttv � M � 5 T E R I N D E )( 0 F 11 l L S ( T E 5 A N D L 0 C A T 1 0 N S . Oetober 15, 1992 _ � � Site to Twn Nwber Mame Address Currmtly Listed On Vaqe Wd� --'--^-----..'- -'--" .-^'-----^"'-^'-----_'.- ....----'-'----"---------' '----"----'---- `-----'--. --" ' pE�gppy � 3-2892 PROPERTY 3 CEMTENNUL DR. L.T.B.1. lT8 ' 7S PEABODY 3-2975 PROPERTY 161 LYNN ST. L.T.B.1. LTB - TS ' PEABODY 3-3737 PaOPERTY 7 FIRST 5T. YAIVER WY - 2< " PEABODT 3'3368 PROFERTY 286 NEWBURY ST. , L.T.B.I. LT9 ' 73 � PEABOOY 3-4100 PROGERTY - 4 WSELCINK DR . . k.T.8.1. LT8 - 73 �es iEABmY 3-�177 DROPERTY 258 NEYBURI' ST L-T.B-I• �T6 " 73 �e6 . � PEABODY 3-0410 ROPET REAL EST'TE TRUST 58 VUTASKI Si. REMEDI�L YEM - 9 PEABODY 3-3625 SENTER TRAMSPORTATION C0. fARN54ARTN SLNOOL L.T.B.I. LTB� - 75 , PEABODY 3•7952 SERVICE STATIdI 136 NEWBURY ST. L.T.B.1. LTB - TS ' � PERBODY 3-2249 SNELL GAS STATION 468 LOWELL ST. V�IVER WY - 26 PE�BODY 3-2815 SHELL STATION 14 NE48UR1'PORT TRNPK L.T.B.1. !TB - 7S , PEABODY 3•0829 SIRIOS -LEATHER C0. 61 8 72 LOYELL ST. L.T.B.I. LTB - 73 . PEABODY 3'0090 SPILL RTE 128, NORTNBp1ND 1.7.B.i. LTB ' T3 , PEABODY 3•0413 STIIHL FINISXING � 13 LORYIN ST. PLANT CdIFIRMED COM -169 . PEABODY 3-0412 STRAUSS TANNERY 145 - 147 LOMELL ST. DELETED DEL - 6 � - PE�BODY 3-1088 SUMMiT INDUSTRY L.T.B.I. lT8 - 73 Tes PEABOOY 34193 SUN R8M OIL SERVICE STRTION 1 LYNNE ST. L.T.B.L LTB : TS . � PEABODT 3•1514 TEXACO DOOIEY'S WRAGE 19 CENTRAL ST. L•T•B•�• LTB ' 73 . PEABODY 3-2360 TRAILER PARK 267 NEWBURY ST. ��ER �v ' n ' PEABODY - 3-3369 US POST OFFICE ESSE% CENTER DRIVE LT.B.I. � LTB - TS GE�BODY 3-0584 VICTORY TANNING LORP. 32 UPTON ST. L.T.B.I. LTB - 7S , PEABOOY 34675 VIP SOUSA SERVICE 176 NAIN 5T. L.T.8.1. lTB - 73 . PEABODT 3-2805 YEBSTER INDUSiRICS 58 REAR WUSKI ST. L.T.B.L lW - 7S . � PENBROKE - 4-0381 11ETN� PUMP OLD VASNINGTON ST. DELETED OEL - 6 , PEMBRpCE 4-0253 BETHAL CXAPEL 159 4ASNINGTON ST. DELETED DEL - 6 VEMBROKE 4-0138 JERRY'S AUTO SERVICE 794 MASXINGTON ST. REMEDIAL REM - 9 , , � ' Fage: MAS -162 � M � S T E R 1 N D E, X 0 F � L L S I T E S A N D L 0 C A T I 0 N S �� _ October 75. 7992 � ' . ,F �-� Mer � Site . � � to � . Town Muaber Name Address Cur�mtly Listed On Ppe Bodc ___"___________ ___"_ __-'_'___'_____......_...___ _____________-_._._________ __._________:___ __..____' ____ ' ROWIEY 3-1897 ROYIEY AUTO PARTS 164 BOf(FORD RD. L.T.B.1. lTB - 79 ROYLET 3-0860 TRANSENE CO/ROYLEY BIOCHEM RTE 1 L.T.B.1. LTB - 79 , RUSSELL 7-0384 .OECOTEAU SERYICE� STATION RTE 20 CONFIRMED COM -185 � ' RUSSELL 1•0755 NARBOR PEiROLEUI CORP. RTE 20 L RTE 2S CONFIRMED COM •185 � .� RUSSELL 1-0156 STRATNIIORE PAPER IUIM ST. WIVER WV - 27 RUTUMD 2-0321 RUT�AND GlASS 13 POIMAq155ET RD. L.i.8.1. lTB - 79 � RUTLAND 2•0118 RUTLAND YIDEO . � RTE 122 L.T.B.1. LTB - 79 " ' SALEN 3-3959 BAY 5T11TE ADHESIVES SOUTX lUSON ST CONFIRMED COM -185 � SALEM 3•1567 BEST PETROLEUM 745 CANAL ST. LONfIRMED CON -185 SALEM 3-3252 BIG FRED'S 17 CANAI ST. YA(VER � WV - 27 � � SALEM 3-1709 BOSTON GAS/S�LEM LNG PLT PIERCE �VE. 8 YAITE ST. CpIFIRMED COM -185 � SALEM 3-1387 BROTHER LEATNER fA. 12 HANSON ST. L.T.B.1. LTB - 79 . SALEM . 3-2383 BURSAY OiL 2 PARADISE RD. � L.T.B.1. LTB - 79 � SALEM 3-2280 COlWERCUL PRWERTT . 105-177 CANAL ST. N�IVER WV - 27 � SALEM 3•3551 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY 234 BRIDGE ST. L.7.8.1. LTB • 79 , SALEM 3-3741 COMMERCI�L PROPERTY 2 LYNDE STREET NAIYER � Y�V - 27 � - S�IEM 3-0039 FAFARD CONSTRUCTION RTE 107 8 SYAMPSCOTT RR. L.T.B.1. LTB - 79 � SAIEM 5-3261 FMR MUNICIPAL LANDFILL MEMOR1111 DRIVE YAIVER. VAV - 27 � SALEM 3-0539 FMR OLD COLONY WS STATION 31 BRIDGE ST. YAIVER , WV - 27 � SALEM 3-2135 FORNER TANK FARM - 51 VHARF Si. L.T.B.[. LTB - 79 SALEM 3•3206 GIBBS SERVICE STpT10N 295 DERB'/ ST. CONFIRMED CON •185 � ' SALEM 3-OG26 GRIT 6 GREASE CIUMBERS 50 FORT 11VE. L.T.B.1. LTB�- 79 � SALEM 3-0427 GTE PRODUCTS CORP. 60 BOSTpI ST. L.T.8.1. lT8 - 79 SALEM 3-0633 GTE STLVANIA 71 IORING AYE. WIVER WV • 27 , SALEM 3-2565 NAMBLET 3 XAYES 20 COLONI�L RD. L.T.B.1.. LTB - 19 SALEM 3•2790 1NDUSTRUL PRWERTY 1 PE�BODY ST. YAIVER 411V - 27 . , ' ' � � . Pege: MAS -163 M A 5 T E R 1 N D E X 0 F A L L S 1 7 E 5 A N U L 0 C � T I 0 N 5 - October 15, 7992 � Ncr Site to 7q� Nufier Neme �ddress Currently Listed On is9� � """-"""'-' ._-'-- ---'---^----'---"-----'--- ^'---..•.------'-----'--'- ---'-'------'--- "---' , SALEM 3-3457 IMDUSTR[Al PROPERTY 285 CAMAI ST. YAIVER WV - 27 S�LEM 3•0918 JEFF'S AU70 SERVICE 65 BRIDCE ST. L.T.8.1. LTB - 79 - , SALEN 5-1278 KERN11000 COUMTRY CLUB KERN{AOD QIDGE RD. CONFIRMED COM '1E5 SAIEM 3-OR6 LITYIN MOTORS 606 ESSE% ST. LT.B.I. lTB - 79 � �, SIILEM 3-2898 M1155ACNUSETTS ELECTRIC C0. DERBY ST. i NAYTXORNE 8LW L.T.B.I. LTB - 79 " � SAIEM 3'3613 MERIT WS STATipI 90 MORTH ST. L.T.B.I. lT8 - 79 . SALEM 3•3170 MOBIL ST�TIOIF A01-150 7530 CONCORDE Si. I.T.B.I. lT8 ' 79 ' SALEM 3•0153 MOFFAT REALTY 10 JEFFERSON AVE. L.1.B.1. LTB - 79 � SALEM 3-0865 NEY ENGLAND POMER 24 FORT AVE. �•T•8•�• �TB " � � SALEM 3-3502 NEY ENGLAND TELEPXdlE 35 MORMAN ST. I.T.B.I. LTB - 79 SALEM i'OL28 NORTX R1VER SALEM N�RBOR, RTE 174 L.T.B.I. LTB - 79 � ShIEN � 3-0430 0'BRIEN TANNERY TREMONT PL. REMEDI�L REM - 10 � SALEN 3-1776 PRWERTY 311 �ERBY ST. L.T.B.L . lTB - 79 �� SALEM 3-1359 PROPERTY 285 OERBY ST. YAIVER WV - 27 _ . SALEM 3-1921 PROPERTY 433-435 NIGXL�ND AVE. L.T.8.1. LTB - 79 , . SALEM 3-2084 VROVERTY 281 DERBY/24-26 CONGRESS L T-B•1• LTB " 79 S�LEM 3'3165 PROPERTY 5 OLIVER ST L.T.B.I. LTB - 80 � SALEM 3'3174 VROPERTY 278 DERBY ST I.T.B�.L LTB ' 80 � SALEM i-3525 PROPERTY NEE �IERCE AVENUE 6 Y�ITE ST LOMFIRMED ' COM '186 � SALEM 3-3651 RTDER TRUCX RENT�L 39 JEFGERSOM �VE. L.T.B.I. LTB - e0 � SALEM 3-OG31 SALEM ACRES 57 IURLBORO RD. CONFIRMED COM '1B6 SALEM 3-3761 SAIEM OW 5 JEFFERSON AVE L.T.B.f. LTB - EO , 511LEM 3-0903 SALEM EVENING 1�Y5 155 MASNINGTON ST. L.T.8.1. lTB - l0. �SALEM 3$131 SALEM O1L 3 GREASE� � 60 GROVE ST. W�tVER �� ' � , SALEM 3-0097 SALEM ORTHODEDIC SURGEONS 6 COLBY ST. CANFIRMED �M '�� SALEM 34310 S�LEM PLATIMG � 50 BROADYAY - L.T.B.I. LTB - EO � � ' �' Vage: !US -td. . � � N A S T E R I N D E X 0 F A L L 5 1 T E S � N D L 0 C A T 1 0 N S � � October 15, 7992 . ,,F--� . � M� . Site tb Tpin Munber Mame 1lddress CurrentlY Listed On Pa9e 9ook ...-:-..'----"- ^---- -------^'----'-'------'-'-- --------------------------- -----'.-----.... ----...-- "-- , S�LEM 3-3766 SALEM RENTAL GR 130 CAMAL ST L.T.B.1. LTB - !0 S11LEM 3-1710 SALEN MARENWSE 12 FRANKLIM ST. REMEDI�L REM - 10 � SALEM 3-78i5 SERVICE STATION i43 MfGNUND AVE. L.T.B.I. LTB - 80 ' . SALEM 3•2308 SXO�PING PUZA SO STATE ROAD L.T.B.I. LTB - 60 : � SALEM 3-7480 SOUTXLIIMD CORP. COMGRE55 i DERBT ST. 1.T.8.1. LTB - 00 SALEM 3-3892 SUNOLO SERVILE STATIOM 105 NORTN STREE� L.T.B.I. LTB ' 80 � SALEK I-0784 TECMNICAL DATA• 700 NIGXUND AVE. L.T.B.1. lT8 - EO � . SAL RBURY 3-0771 GUSEMAY ENTERVRISES BRIDGE RD. �A1VER _ WV ' 27 rSALISBURY 3-1925 DOWNEAST DISBAiCH RABBIT RD. 8 OLD ELM ST. L.T.B.I. LTB - !0 SALISBURY 3-1181 EXXON STATIpI 591 NORTN END BLVD L.T.B.L LTB • 80 _ . , SALISBURY 3-1238 FORMER WS ST�TION 780 MAIN ST. L.T.B.L LTB - BO � S�USBURY 3-2862 MOOERN CONiINENUL CONST. 266 BEACN RD. L.T.B.1. . LTB � &I - � i SALISBURY 3-1711 PROPERTY 788 ELM ST. LT.B.1. LTB - 80 � � SAL158URY 3-3359 PRO�ERT1' 84 ELM 5T. L.T.B.L LTB - 80 - S�L158URY 3-1713 WINN YELLS 7, 5 8 6 MA/NX Si�TE LINE REMEDIAL REM - 10 , � S�LISBURY 3-1489 SAFETY KLEEN 189 YIILOW ST. WAIVER , N�V - 27 . . SALISBURY 3•1242 SALISBURY E%XON • BEACX 8 LAFATETTE RD. L.T.B.I. LTB " 8� , , SALISBURY 3-0954 SUNOCO STATION RTE 110 ELM ST. L.T.B.(. LTB - 80 � SANDYICH 4-0393 CROCKER JUNKYARD/FMR J. BRADEN TNOMPSON RD. CONFIRMED COM •186 � S1INDYICX 6-0153 NERBICIDE UNDFILL RTE 730 RENEDIAL REN - 10 � SANDYICH � 4-1167 KIAN�S YAY 378 RTE 130 6 KIAM'S VAY fANFlRNED COM '186 � ' SANDYICN 4-0473 KYE ENTERPRISES INC. 182 RTE 6A CONFIRMED COM -7e6 , SAMDYICN 6-0151 M115ACN1 CONSTRUCTION TUPPER RD. RENEDIAL REM - 10 _ SANDYICH 4-0152 SANDYICN SEPi�GE DISPOSIIL F WAKER MEETINGXOUSE RD., I.T.B.I. LTB � afl � SIINDYICX 4•0892 SVAN MOBIL ST�TION 127 RTE 6A � L.T.B.1. lTB - EO � SANDYICH G-099L TNAYER PNARMALY 125 RTE 6A CONfIRMED COM •187 ' � APPENDIX D I � �. a� � � r � r r � � r� � � � � � � � � � � , � � , , � � APPENDIX D � TEST PIT AND BORING LOGS � � � � 1 ' � � 1 � GZA GeoEnvironmental, [nc. � Boring No. GZ-1 , � Enqineers/Scientists Former Tannery Site Page 1 of 1 320 Needham Street - - Neuton Upper Falls, Massachusetts 02164 Salem, Massachusetts File No. 13172.1 (617) 969-0050 ' Chkd. By: DJA - eoring Co. GZA Drilling, 9nc. CaSjn9 Sampler Grounduater Readings Foreman Richard Jones Type HSA Split Spoon Da[e Time Depth Casing Stab. Time �G2A Rep. R. Tilley:ck I.D./O.D. 3.75"/6.0" 1.3"/2.5" OS/73/93 0800 8.2 10� - Date Start OS/13/93 End OS/13/93 Hammer ut. 740i! OS/13/93 0830 5.2 Out Completion � Location See Exploration Location Plan Hammer Fall 30" GS.EIev. Datwn Other D C B Sample Information Sample Stratum R Equipnent Instatled P 5 L M i N N Pen./ Depth Blous/ Field Description & Llassification Description K � H G S No. Rea (Ft.) 6° Test Data 5 Lurb Box concrete S-1 24/11 0-2 14-13 ND Medium dense, black, fine [o coarse 1. 0-0.5' SAND, some(+) Sil[, lit[le Gravel. 16-19 .::, Bentonite I Seal �:: 0.5-1.5� 2" PVC >' Riser : 0_3, 5 S-2 24/13 5-7 11-28 ND Top 11": Very dense, brown, fine m IFilter coarse SAND, some Gravel, trace Silt. ��. Sand 27-18 Bottom 2°: Very dense, rust, fine to SAND < 1.5-13� medium SAND, little Sili. 2" PVC �f: Nellscreen :; 3-13' 10 5-3 24/10 10-12 11-18 ND Dense, broun, fine to coarse SAND, trace(-) Silt. 19-20 , Bo[tom of Boring at 13'. 15 20 � 25 , 1. Field testing readings represent total or9anic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured R in the headspace of covered soil sample jars using an HNu Model PI-101, 10.2 eV photoioniiation analyzer. e Results are in parts per million (ppn). ND �ndicates nothing detected. m a r k 5 Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries betueen soil types, transitions may be gradual. Naier level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. ftucivations of groundwater may occur due to factors other than those present at the time measurements were made. � . Boring No. GZ-1 � - ' GZA GeoEnvironmentat, [nc. BoN ng No. GZ-2 En9�neers/Scientists Former Tannery Site page 1 of 1 320 Needham Street � - - Newton Upper Falls, Massachusetts 02164 Salem, Massachusetts File No. 13172.1 � (617) 969-0050 � '', � Chkd. By: DJA Borin9 Co. G2A Drilling, Ina Casin9 SamDlEf Groundua[er Readings .Foreman Richard Jones Type HSA Split Spoon Date Time Depth Casing Stab. Time .GZA Rep. R. Tiltey:ck I.D./O.D. 3.75"/6.0" 1.3"/2.5" OS/13/93 0915 7.0 10' - Date Start OS/13/93 End OS/13/93 Namner Wt. 140# OS/13/93 0945 6.5 Out Completion I Location See Ezploration Location Plan Hammer fall 30" �I GS.EIev. Datum Other D C B Sample Information Sample Stratum R Equipment Installed P S L M T N N 7en./ Depth Blous/ Fietd Description 8 Classification Description K. ��. H G S No. Rea (Ft.) 6" Test Data S Curb Box �� Concrete 5-1 16/11 0-1.3 21-24 ND Very dense, variegated, fine to 1. 0-0.5' coarse SAND, sane(-) Gravel trace(«) 100/4" Silt, Cinder, Brick (FILU.� :::: Bentonite Seal SAND (FILU ;:. 0.5-1.5' '. i 2" PVC , '. wellscreen �, .f'�. 0-10' �. 5 S-2 24/14 5-7 5-3 ND Top 5": Loose, dark gray fine to 5.5' � ��. FiLter coarse SAND, trace Grave� and Silt. '�. Sand � 2-4 Bottom 9": Medium stiFF, dark broun � :: 1.5-12' to black SILT and CLAY. SILT AND CLAY 10' - 10 � .._.rl S-3 24/24 10-12 10-7 ND Top 20": Very stiff, olive CLAY and CLAY SILT. 77.5' � 9-10 Bottom 4��: Very stiff, light broun, Silty CLAY: SILTY CLAY 8ottom of Boring at 12'. � 15 � , 20 � � 25 � ' 1. See Remark No. 1 on Boring Log G2-1. R e m a r k s � Stretifiwtion lines represent approximate boundaries betueen soil types, transitions may be gradua L IJater level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. fluctuations of grounduater may ocwr due to factors other than those present at the time measurements uere made. Boring No. GZ-2 � GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Boring No. GZ-3 Enaineers/Scientists Former Tannery Site Page 1 of 1 320 Needham Street - - Neuton Upper Falls, MassachuseCts 02164 Salem, Massachusetts Fite No. 13172.1 (617) 969-0050 Chkd. By: DJA eoring co. GZA Drilling, Inc. Lasina Sam ler Grounduater Readings ioreman Richard Jones Type HSA Split Spoon Date Time Depth Casing Stab. Time GZA Rep. R. Tilley:ck I.D./O.D. 3.75"/6.0" 1.3"/2.5" OS/13/93 1030 6.9 10' - Date Start OS/13/93 End OS/13/93 Hammer ut. 140# OS/13/93 1100 4.9 Out Completion �' Loca[ion See Exploration Location Rlan Hammer Fall 30" GS.EIev. Datum Other - D C B Sample Information Sample Stratum R Equipnent Installed P S L M . T N LI Pen./ Depth Blous/ Field Description 8 Classification Description K ' H G S No. Rec. (Ft.) 6" Tes[ Data 5 Lurb Box Concrete S-1 24/12 0-2 2-4 ND Top b��: Loose, black SILT, some SILT 7. 0-0.5' fine to coarse Sand, trace Roots. 5-5 Bottom b": Loose, dark broun, fine :,. Bentonite to CoarSe SAND little(*) $ilt, '�. Seal trece(+) Grave�. �: 0.5-1.5' 2" PVC �i'�. Riser i'. 0-3' 5 S-2 24/19 5-7 4-10 ND Medium dense, broun, fine to medium �� Filter SAND, trece(-) Silt. SAND ��. Sand 13-14 1 1.5-13' :��'. 2" PVC 3. LleLlscreen :i 3-13� 10 � S-3 11/17 10-10.9 49-100/5" ND Very dense, broun, fine to coarse 2. SAND, trece Silt (Granite Cobble in , tip). Bottom of Boring at 13.5'. 15 20 25 1. See Remark No. 1 on Boring Lo9 GZ-1. R e m a - r k s Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries betueen soil types, transitions may be gradua L Llater level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. FluctuaYions of grounduater may occur due to factors other than those present at the time measurements were made. Boring No. GZ-3 � � GZA GeoEnvirommental, Inc. Boring No. GZ-4 Engineers/Scien[ists Former Tannery Site Page 1 of 1 320 Needham Street � - - Neuton Upper Falls, Massachusetts 02764 Salem, Massachusetts File No. 13172.1 (617) 969-0050 Chkd. By: DJA Boring Co. GZA Drilling, Inc. Casina Samoler Grounduater Readings i oreman Richard Jones Type HSA Split Spoon Date Time Depth Casin9 Stab. Time 2A Rep. R. Tilley:ck I.D./0.0. 3.75"/6.0" 1.3"/2.5" OS/13/93 1145 6.5 10' - IDate Start OS/73/93 End OS/73/93 Hamner Nt. 740# OS/13/93 7275 4.2 Out Canpletion II_ocation See Exptoration Location Glan Xammer Fall 30" .�S.Elev. Datum Other . D C B Sample Information Sample Stratum R Equipmerit [nstalled P S L M . T N VI Pen./ Depth Blous/ Field Description 8 Classifiwtion Description K H G S No. Rec. (Ft.) 6" Test Da[a 5 Lurb Box Con[rete S-1 24/13 0-2 13-24 1 Top.6": Very dense, black SILT and SILT AND 1. 0-0.5' fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel SAND - 30-16 and Roots. -„ eentonite ' Bottom 7": Very dense, brown fine '�. Seal to coarse SAND, trace(t) Si�t, �: 0.5-1.5' trace Gravel. ..'rl 2" PVC - Nellscreen � 0-9.5' � S 5-2 24/7 5-7 27-14 ND Medium dense, broun, fine to coarse SAND 2. �'. Filter SAND and GRAVEL, trace(+� Sil[. AND ��: Sand � � 7-13 GRAVEL .i; 1.5-12' � � 10 S-3 24/7 10-12 14-12 ND Medium dense, broun, fine to coarse SAND arxl GRAVEL, trece(�) Silt. 15-17 IBottom of Boring at 12'. � ' 75 20 25 1. See Remark No. 1 on Boring Log G2-1. � R 2. Numerous cobbles present in auger cuttin9s. e m a r k s i Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries betueen soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water leveL readings have been made at times and uMer conditions stated. Fluctuations of grounduater may occur due to factors other than those present at the time measurements were made. Boring No. GZ-4 I � • �� GZA GeoEnvirommental, Inc. Boring No. GZ-5 Engineers/Scien[ists Former Tannery Site Pa9e 1 ot 1 320 Needham Street Neu[on Upper Falls, Massachusetts 02164 Salem, Massachusetts Fite No. 13172.1 (617) 969-0050 Lhkd. By: �JA Boring Co. G2A Drilling, Inc. Casina Sampler GrourWwater Readings � foreman Richard Jones Type HSA Split Spoon Date Time Depth Casing Stab. Time •GZA Rep. R. Tilley:ck I.D./0.0. 3.75"/6.0" 1.3��/2.5" OS/13/93 1400 4,5 10' - Date Start OS/13/93 ErW OS/13/93 Hammer wt. 140# OS/13/93 1415 2.9 Out Caripletion tocation See Exploration Location Plan , Hamner Fall 30" �GS.EIev. Oatum O[her D C B Sample Information Sample Strawm R Equipment Installed - P 5 L M ' T N U Pen./ Depth Blous/ Field Description & Classification Description K H G 5 No. Rec. (Ft.) 6" Tes[ Data S Curb Box i Concrete S-1 4/4 0-0.3 700/4" 3 Very dense, black, fine to coarse � 0-0.5' SAND, some Silt, trace Gravel. SAND -::: Bentonite i Seal I .: 0.5-1.5' � 4' t ..s Filter r: Sand — SILT 8 CLAY ,'�. 1.5-12' g 5.5� ± S-2 12/24 5-7 4-3 3 Top 4": Dense, dark broun to btack '� 2" PVC � SRT and CLAY, little(�) fibers '�. Hellscreen 38-18 (roots and grass). �� 0-70' Bottan 8": Dense, dark broun to bLack, � fine to coarse SAND, little Gravel, trace(+� Silt. SAND 10 S-3 78/18 70-11.5 6-18 ND Very dense, broun, fine to coarse SAND, t�ace Silt. � ' 100/6° '�' 8ottan of Boring at 12�. 75 ,� I � 20 � � ZS � I � 1. See Remark No. 1 on Boring Log GZ-1. R e m � a k s Stretification lines represent approximate boundaries betueen soil types, transitions may be gradual. uater level �� readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of grounduater may occur due to factors other than those present at the time measurements uere made. Boring No. GZ-5 � ��, GU GeoEnvirorniental, Inc. 8oring No. CZ-6 En9ineers/Scientists Farmer Tannery Site Page 7 of 1 320 Needham Street Newton Upper Fetls, Massechusetts 02764 Salem, Massachusetts File No. 131R.1 � (617) 969-0050 Chkd. By: DJA Boring Co. G2A Drilling, Inc. Casiny Samoler Grounduater Readings � Formien Richard Jones Type HSA Split Spoon Date Time Depth Casing Stab. Time GU Rep. R. Tilley:ck I.D./O.D. 3.75"/6.0�� 1.3"/2.5" OS/13/93 1515 18.25 20' Date Start OS/73/93 End OS/13/93 Hammer Ht. 140# OS/13/93 1545 22.1 Out Completion � Location See Exploretion Location Plan Hammer Fall 30" � . , GS.EIev. Datun Othe� D C 8 Sample Information Sample Stratun R Equipment lnstalled P 5 L M T N W Pen./ Depth 8lows/ Field Description 8 Clessification Description K H G S No. Rec. (Ft.) 6" Test Data S Curb Box .,. Concrete 1. ':: ;:';; p_�� Backfill 1-11' 2" PVC Riser �� 5 0•14.5' � 70 Z• ,�1 �� Bentonite SAND Seal 11-12' �, Filter . Sand 1245� `i5 � 2" PVC ' Wellscreen � : 14.544.5' � 20 _. �� 22� ! I� � S1LTY CLAY � 25 Bottom af Boring at 25�. � � 1. Monitoring uell was installed; no samples uere collected during boring due to time constraints. R e 2. Stratum description from auger cuttings. m � a r k s Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries betueen soil types, transitions may be graduaL. 17ater level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of grounduater may occur due to factors � other than those present at the time measurements uere made. Boring No. G2-6 � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-100 Enginee�s/SCientists SHEEi N0. ��r Former Tanner Site FILE N0. �5172� ea Y a em, eu amps ire CHKD. BY: �— � EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT �GZA REP. R.TilleY:mem LONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR eor e �c er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Partiv Sunnv. 60s MAKE ase TIME SiARTED �8'f� CAPAC cu. . REACH ��2 tIME COMPLETED —Q9Q� DECTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION P[D EXCAV. BOUlDERS: REMARK NO. READING EFFORT CWNT/ N0. � (ppn) CLASS � Broun to bla[k, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL, some Cinders, ND E 10-i5A 1. t� S-1 trere Sil[ (FRU. z� E 10-i5A — z, 5-z ND E 10-15A 3' 5-10A E 1-28 — 4' S-3 .� Light broun, fine to medium SAND, little Gravel, trace Silt. 5-10A 5 ND E . 148 � 5-10A E 1'28 b� 5-10A 5-4 4' ND E 1-28 7� 5-t0a ND E 1-28 8' S-5 S-6 Light broun SI�7 and CLAY, sane(-) fine to medium SaM. 5-70A ND E 7-28 9� 5-10A S-9 ND E 1-28 10' Bot[an of Test Pit at 9.5'. 11' 12' � �3 � �4 �r— 15' 16' � REMPRKS: � 1. N-Nu readings represen[ total organic vapor levels, referenced to a benzene standard, measured in the headspace of sealed soil sample jars using an H:Nu Model PI-101 photoionization analyzer. ResuLts in parts per miLlion (ppn). ND indicates nothing detected. ' 2. Crounduater observed at approximately 9� flouing into the excavation slouly. I� � TEST PIT PLFN BOULDER CIASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRWNDHATER USED � 9' LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (%) ENCWNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENLOUNTERED � 3.5' TRACE CTR J 0 ' 10% C = CORRSE p 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTM B 18" - 36° LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND- � SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) 41ATER BN = BROWN NORTN EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOLI Completion 9' � VOLUME = 71 cu.yd E-----EASY � � M-----MODERATE i D-•-•-DIFFILULT G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-101 Engineers/Scientists SHEET N0. Tbr�'� Former Ta�nner�Si[e FILE N0. —T3172 T �ea o y a el m, Neu HampsFire CHKD. BY: —SJ�— E%CAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR eor e �c er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Parcly Sunnv, 60s MAKE ase TtME STAR7ED —Q9Z� LAPAC cu. . REACH —TTT TIME COMPLETED —TIID� DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTfON PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMFRK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (pp�) CLFSS 4B BLa[k, fine to coarse SAND, some(-) Gravel, [race Sitt, trace ND M 1-2A 1.,2, 1' S-1 Roots, trace Cinders (FLLU. 1-2A Z' M 3s Z' ---------------- S-2 � 180 E 1-2A 3. 3' elack, fine to coarse SAND, some Gravel, trace(�) Silt. � E 1-2P 4' S-3 5' 195 E 1-2A 5' 8rown, fine to coarse SAUD, littte Silt. E 1-2q G. b' 5-4 170 7' Bottom of Test Pit at 6.5'. 8' 9' 10' ii' 12' 73' 14' I 15 ib' REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit log TP-100. 2. Seven granite blocks, approximately 3'x2'xi', were excavated from top 2'. 3. Visual and oLfactory evidence of oil contamination in soil at 2' to 5'. 4. GroundWater observed flouing into excavation at 5.5'. 5. Sheen and foam observed on top of 9roundwater in excavation. TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATER ' USED � LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (%) ENLOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED �5' TRALE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH 10' B 18" - 36" L RTLE (LI J 10 - 20� P/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO T0. L 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WFTER BN = BROUN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOu - VOLUME = 17.5 cu.yd E---—EASY Completion 5.5' M-----MODERATE . D-----DIFiICULT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-102 Enaineers/Scientists SHEEF u0. —1�f—i— Former Tanner Site FILE N0. �f3172 T ea o Y a em. eu amps ire LHKD. 8Y: �T� EXCRVATION E�UIPMENT GZA REP. R.Ti(lev:mem CONTRACtOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR eor e t[ er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Sunnv. 60s MAKE ase . TIME STARTED —TQII� CAPAC cu. . REALN —TT� TIME COMGLETED �D3� DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (PPm) LLASS 1'2P 4 M 18 1. i' Broun, fine io medium SAND, some(-) Gravel, [race Sitt and S-1 Cinders (FILU. E 1-2A 2� S-2 3� 190 E 1-2F 3� S-3 3.5' Black 5[lT to fine SAND. 160 E 1-2A 3. 4' Broun, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel and Silt uith alterna[ing layers of gray to broun SILT, trace Roots (layers may be discontinuous). 90 E 1-2A 5' S-4 Bottom of Test Pit at 5.0�. b' 7� 8' 9' 10' 11' 12' ' �3 14' ' 15� 16' ' REMARKS: , 1. Refer to Remark No. i on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Visual and olfactory evidence of oil contamination in soit. 3. Grounduater observed at 4.5'. ' , TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATER ' USED 8� LETTER SI2E RANGE F = fINE (x) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED �5� TRACE (TRJ 0 - 10o C = COARSE F 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20< F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO ' C 36" AND LRRGER f/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) uATER BN = BROWN NORTH EXCAVATION EFfORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOLI Completion 4.5� VOLUME = 7.4 cu.yd E-----EASY ' M-----MODERATE D----DIFFICULT GZN GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST P�7 N0. TP-103 En9ineefS/$CientiStS SHEET N0. TQ�T former Ta�nnery Si[e FILE N0. �3V2.'� ea o v alem, Neu HampsFtre CHKD. BY: �S�— E%CAVATION EOUIPMENT G2A REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRAC70R ENPRO DA7E OS/OS/93 OPERATOR �eor e ic er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Partly Sunny, 60s MAKE a�se F�58IJ� TIME STARTED �U4� � CAPAC cu.Y . REALN —T'�� TIME COMPLETED —tUS�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION P[D EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) CLASS Brown fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL, trace Silt and Cinders, S-1 1' Concrete, Roots (iILU. ND E 1. 1' 1.5' Concrete Slab. D 2' S-2 Brown, fine to coarse SAND, little Gravel, trace(+� Cinders, ND E 3� trece Silt (FILU. 2.,3. 4� Bottom of Test Pit at 3.5'. — 5' b' 7' 8' 9' 10� 11' 12' 13' 14' 15' 16' � REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Ground itouing into excavation very quickly at depth at 3.5'. 3. Could not excavate belou 3.5'; excavation continuously caving in. TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS RBBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATER USED 8' � LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION �M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED �3� TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A b" - 18" V = VERY ELA7SED DEPTH B 18" - 36" UTTLE (LI.) 10 - 20� F/M = fINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUN�- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) UFTER BN = BROWN NORTH E%CAVAT[ON EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLON Completion 3.5' VOWME = 3.1 cu.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D-----DIFfICl1LT G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST FIT N0. TP-104 Engineers/S[ientists SHEET N0. �— Former Tanner Site FILE N0. �3172-� ea o Y a em, eM amps tre CHKD. 8Y: �I�— E%LAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tilley:mem LONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERA70R o n oue GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Partly Sunny, bOs MAKE ase TIME STARTED �T6� CAPAC [U. . REACH —i7T TIME COMPLETED —TTT� DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: � REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) LLA55 . �Dark broun, fine to medium SAND, tra[e Gravel, Sand and S-1 1' Roots. ND E 1F 1. 1' --------—------_ S-2 ND E 2' Reddish broun, fine to coarse SAND, little Gravel, trace Silt. E 1A 3' 4' E 4� Brown, fine to coarse SAND. 5-3 ND E 2. 5' Bottom of Test Pit at 5'. b' 7' 8' 9' 10' 11' 12' ' �3 14' ' 15' 16' ' REMARKS: , 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-700. 2. Grounduater observed at 4.0�. , ' TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PR070RTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDUATER USED ' 7' LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION LLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED �Z TRALE (TR.) 0 - 10� C = COARSE A b" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSE� DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 70 - 20� F/M = PINE TO MED NM TIME TO TO � C 36" FND LARGER F/C = FINE TO LOARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) � 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (NOURS) WATER 8N = BRONN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOW Completion 4.0' VOLUME = 2.6 cu.yd E-----EASY ' M-----MODERATE . D-----DIFFILULT G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TE57 v17 N0. T7-105 Engineers/Scientists SHEET N0. T�� former ianner Site F[LE N0. �f3172-� ea o v a em, eu amps ire CHKD. 8V: �J� EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT G2A REP. R.TiLteY:mem LONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n awe GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Sunnv. 60s CAPAC w5e . REACH —TTTt TIME COMPLETED � —TZII1�— DEPTH SAMGLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID E%CAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. � READING EFFORT LOUNT/ N0. (ppn) CLASS eroun, fine to medium SAND, little Gravel, trace Roots and 5-1 1' Sitt. ___________ ND E 1. �' —_--- '. z� S Z ND E 1A 3� E 1A Light broun, fine to wasre SAND, trace(+) Gravel, trace Sitt. , E 4' ND E 5' 5.5' E 1A 2. 6' S-3 Brown, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL. 7' Bottom of Test Pit at 6.5'. � 8' 9' 10' 11' 12' 13' 14' . 15' 16' ' REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-700. 2. Grounduater observed flowing into excavation at b�. TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLA55 PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDNATER USED 8' LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED � 1.5' TRACE (TR.) 0 ' 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (L[J 10 - 20e F/M = F1NE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO LOFRSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% CR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROWN NORTH E%CAVATION EFFORi AND 35 - SOo YEL = YELLOW VOLUME = 2_9 cu.yd E-----EASY Completion b' M-----MODERATE ' D-----DIFFICULT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-106 Enqineers/Scientists SHEE7 N0. �— Former Tanner Site FILE N0. �f3172 T ea o Y a em. eW amp5 i�e CHKD. 8Y: �— EXLqVqTION E�UIPMENT G2A REP. R.TiLlev:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO � DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n oue GROUND E�EV. WEATHER Sunny, 60s MAKE ase TIME STARTED --TTI� CAPAC cu. . REACH —T7—�t TIME COMPLETED �3Q0— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. � READING EFFORT COUN7/ N0. (Ppn) C1A55 � Dark broun, fine to medium SAND, tra[e Gravel and Silt and 1' Roots. M None 1. I �' —_______________ M None 2' 5-1 8roun, fine to coarse SAND and GRAUEL. ND M None 2. 3' ' 4' M None 3. 4' Bottom of Test Pit at G'. 5' 6� 7' 8 � q� 10� 11' 12' 13' 14' I ,5 16' REMARKS: � 1. Refer [o Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. � 2. Concrete uall located at uestern end of pit; uall runs north-south; scaped off soil on uatl for about 20� (see Test Pi[ Plan). 3. Grounduater observed at about 3.5'. ' ' TEST PIT PIAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATER • USED ' 12' LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED 20��3' TRACE CTR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH � B 18" - 36" LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20% F/M = fINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO ' C 36" AND LARGER F/L = FINE TO LOPRSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35o GR = GRAY (HOURS) LIATER BN = BRONN NORTH E%CAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOU ' VOLUME = 20.4 cu.yd E-----EASY Completion 3.5' M-----MODERATE D-----DIfFICULT . GZA GEOEN4IRONMENTAL, 1NC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. YP-107 Enqineers/Stientists SHEET N0. �� Former Tannery Site FILE N0. �f3172� Geabotiv/Salem, Neu HamosFire CHKD. BY: ' �— EXCAVATION E�UIPMENT G2A REP. R.Titlev:mem � CONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n owe GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Sunny, 705 MAKE ase TIME STARTED --T3Q� CAPAC cu. . REACH �fTT TIME LOMPLETED —T35i�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID E%CAV. eOULDERS: REMARK N0. REROING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. ' CppN CLASS ND E None 1. 1' S-1 ' Broun and black, fine to medium SAND, some Gravel, trace Silt. Z E None 3' E Nane 3' S-2 750 E None 2. 4� Broun GRAVEL and fine to coarse SAND. 5' � E Nane 3. 5' Bottom of Test Pit at 5�. b' ' 7 8' ' 9' 10� , „ 12' ' 13 14' ' 15' 16' ' REMARKS: , 1. Refer to Remark No. t on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Strong odor at about 3'• grounduater also observed at 3'. 3. Excavation caving in be�ow uater table. ' , TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER LLA55 GROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDNATER , USED 6� LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (%) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED �2� TRACE (iR.) 0 - 10� C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" UTTIE (L1.) 10 - 20� F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO ' C 36" AND LARGER F/L = FINE TO LOARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35� GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROUN NORiH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% VEL = YELLOW ' VOLUME = 2.2 cu.yd E-----EASY Completion 3' M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFILUIT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-108 Enqineers/Scientists ' SHEET N0. —T�F—T— Former Tanner Site FILE N0. �3172-� � ea o v a em, eu amps ire CHKD. BY: �,T� EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem LONTRALTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n oue GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Sunny, 70s MAKE ase TIME STnRTED —TLDU— CAPAC cu. . REACH —TTT TIME COMPLETED —TLL�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PI� E%CAV. BOULDERS: REMqRK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. ' (Ppm) C1A55 Dark broun, fine to medium SAND, some Gravel, trace Silt and S-1 1' RootS. ND E None 1.,2. �' ———------------- S-2 � ND D None 2, Reddish-broun, tine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL, trece Silt. 3 D None 3� ND None 3. 4' S-3 Broun GRAVEL and COBBLES, some fine to coarse Sand, trace Sitt. uone 5' Bo(tom of Excava[ion a[ 5'. b' 7' 8, 9' 10' 11 12' 13' 14' 15� ib' REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Concrete and reinforcement bar observed at 1' to 1.5'; it is unclear if concrete is a wall or a slab, and may be partially broken. 3. �Groundwater at 2.9�. TEST PIT PLPN BOl1LDER CLASS PROPORTfONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDHATER ' USED 10' LETTER SiZE RANGE F = FINE ( ) ENCOUN7ERED DESIGNATION CLASS[FICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED 7' �4' TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTM 10' 6 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20Y, F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO , C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROUN NORTH . EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOW Completion 2.9' ' VOLUME = 10.2 Cu.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT I __ _ ' G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST Pli N0. TP-109 Enginee�s/Scientists forme� Tanner Site FILETNO �3��7�-� , ea o v a em. eu amps ire CHKD. BY: �� EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n aue GROUN� ELEV. WEATHER Sunnv, 70s MAKE BSe TIME STARTED —TSQI� CAPAC cu.y . REACH —TTT TIME COMPLETED —TSZS— DEPTH SAMPLE SO[L OESCRIGTION. PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. , (ppn) CLASS 0.5� Light broun, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL, trace Silt, Roots (FILL) ND E Nane 1. 1' , 1' ASPHALT (2" thick). � ND D None 2� 5-1 Varigated color, fine to coarse SAND, some(-) Gravel, trace 2' (+) Silt, trere Cinders (FR�). ND D None 3� 3� Black CINDERS, little fine to coarse Sand (FILU. None 4' S-2 Olive SILT, trace fine Sand. None 2. 5� 5-3 � Bottom of Test Pit at 5'. b' � �i 8' � 9' 10' , 11 12' � 13 14' ' �5 16' � REMARKS: ' 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pi[ Log TP-100. 2. Grounduater observed at 3'. ' , TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER LLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWFTER , USED 7" CETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION LLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED � Z�� TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (LL) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME i0 TO �' C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE REFDING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WFTER BN = BROWN NORTH E%CAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = VELLOIJ ' VOLUME = 2.6 cu.yd E-----EASY Completion 3' M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. , PROJEC7 iEST PIT N0. 7P-110 Engineers/Scientists SHEET N0. T�� iormer ianner Site PILE N0. �f3172 T� ea o v a em, ew amps lre CHKD. BY: �'T� EMLAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem LONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n owe GROUND ELEV. WEFTHER Sunnv. 70s MAKE ase TIME STARTED �SL� CAPAC tu. . REACH �T TIME COMPLETED �bQ�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRI7TION PID EXCFV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORi COUNT/ N0. - (ppn) CLASS 1' Broun to black, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL, trace Silt � 1.,2. S-1 and Roots. ND None 3.,G. 1' Bottom of Test Pit at 6". 2' 3' 4' 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 10' 11� 12' 13' 14' 15' 16' REMFRKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. . 2. Sheen observed in grounduater surface. 3. Wooden railroad ties at 6"; could not continue Test Pit. 4. Grounduater observed at 3" belou ground surface. TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIPTfONS GROUNDWATER USED 2' LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (%) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED �2' TRALE (TR.) 0 - 10� C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36° LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COFRSE READING GROUNO- SOME (50.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROLIN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50: YEL = YEILOW VOLUME = 2 cu.tt E-----EASY Completion 3" � M-----MODERATE � D-----DIFPICULT � , G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INL. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. Tp�111 En9ineers/Scientists Former Tanner Site FRETNO —T3�7� ea o v a em, eu amos ire CHKD. BY: �� EXLAVATION EOUIPMEN7 G2R REG. R.Tillev:mem CONTRALTOR ENPRO DATE OS/06/93 OPERATOR eorge ic er GROUND ELEV. 4EATHER Drizzle, SOs MAKE as�e�f666�58iJ�— TIME STARTED —675� CAPAC cu. . REACH —TTT TIME COMPLETED —II83� DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. . READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. � (Ppn) CLASS �� 5-i ND E None 1. � E None 2' 8roun, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt. E None 2. � 3� � � S-2 ND E None ' 3.,4. I 4� Bottom of Test Pit at 4'. � 5 ' 6� � 7 8� � 9 10' ii' � . �Z , 13' 14� ' 15' 16' , REMARKS: , 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. � 2. Groundwa[er observed flouing into test ptt at 3.5'. 3. Soil appears to be natural and undisturbed. 4. Test pit cavin9 in below uater table. � i TEST GIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS GROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDLIATER • USED � 8' LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (R) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED � 2' TRACE CTR.) O ' 10Y C = COARSE A b" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTIE (ll J 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO � � C 36" NND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = 8ROL1N NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - SOe VEL = YELL04 Completion 4' VOLUME = CU.yd E-----EASY , M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, [NC. PROJECT TE57 PIT N0. TG-112 �Enaineers/Scientis[s SHEET N0. T�1— Former Tannery Site FILE N0. —T3172-� , Peabodv75alem, New a�Fiire CHKD. BY: �7�— ' E%CAVATION E�UIPMENT GZA REP. R.TilLey:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/Ob/93 OPERATOR eor e ic er GROUND ELEV. NEATNER Parly Sunny, bOs MAKE ase 5�8[�— TiME STARTED �54� CAGAC cu. . REACN —T7� 7IME COMPLETED —6IIIIiT— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) CLASS 0.5' Black, fine SAND and SILT, little Roots. S-1 ND E SA 1. �� E 3A 2' Broun, fine to medium SAND, trece Cobbles and Gravel and Silt. ND E 2q 2.,3. 3� S-2 G' Bottom of Test Fit at 3.5'. 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 10' it� 12' � 13' 14� ' 15' 16' 1 REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Grounduater observed flouing into test pit at 3'. 3. Excavation caving in belou uater table. � TEST PIi PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATER USED , 7� LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTEREO DESIGNATION CLASSIFICAT[ON M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED � Z.5' TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20o F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO � C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE REAOfNG GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WFTER BN = BROWN NORTH E%CAVRTION EFFORT AND 35 - 50< YEL = YELLOW Completion 3' VOLUME _ _[u.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT . TEST PIi N0. TP-113 Enqineers/Scientists SHEET N0. —T�FT Former Tanner Site FILE N0. —T3172-� ea o y a em, eu amps ire CHKD. BV: �� EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tilley:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DAiE OS/06/93 OGERATOR eorge ic erg GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Parly Cloudv. 60s MAKE ase�b6EL-58[16 T(ME STARTED —Q40� CAPAC [u. . REACH �T� TIME COMP�ETED —Q9�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOII DESCRiPTION PID EXCPV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) CLASS Brown to light brown, fine to coarse SAND, some Silt and ND E 2-3A 1.,2. 1' S-1 Roots, trace Gravel (FILU. 1.5' M 2-3F 2' D 2-3A 3. 3' Dark brown, fine to coarse SAND some Silt and Gravel D 2-3F 4' (building debris mixed uith soi�) (FILU. D 2-3A 5� $-2 ND D 2-3A G. b' Bottom of Test Pit at b'. � 7' 8' 9' 10' 11' 12� � 13 14' �I ' 15 III ib� � REMARKS: � 1. Refer [o Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. TP-113 located on sloped land imnediately south of TP-112; partially buried drums uere evident. 3. Building debris mixed in uith soil possibly used as fill; materials inctuded: granite block, brick, concrete blocks, pipes, scrap meta� and asphalt pavement pieces. 4. Grounduater uas not encountered, and the bottom of the excavation was at 6'. � � TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS A66REVIATIONS GROUNDWATER , USED 6' LETTER SF2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED �4' TRACE (TR J 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY EIAPSEO DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO � C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO LOARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROWN NORTN E%CAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - SOo YEL = YELLOW Completion -- � VOLUME _ _w.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICUIT GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROdELT TEST PIT N0. TP-114 En9ineers/Scientists SHEET N0. T�T Former Tanner Site FILE N0. —T3172� ea V a em. eu amos tre . CHKD. BY: �S� EXLAVATION EOUIPMENT G2A REP. R.Titlev:mem LONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/Ob/93 OPERATOR eor e ic er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Sunny, 605 MAKE ase SSOE— TIME STARTED —Q951T CAPAL cu. . REACH —TTT TjME COMPLETED �— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. Cppn) CLASS Dark broun to black,- fine to coarse SAND and SILT, [race S-1 0.5' Gravel and Roots. ND E 3A 1. 1� S-2 . ND E None 2' eroun fine SAND, some(-) Sil[, [race Gravel (fine [o coarse Sand (ens at depth of 2.5'). e None 3' 3.5' E None 2. 4� S-3 Olive CLAY and SiLT, uith fine Sand lens. ND� E None 5' 6� eottom ot Test Pit at 5.5'. 7' 8' 9' 10' 11' 12' 13' 14� 15' 16' REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test PiT Log TP-100. 2. Groundwa[er observed seeping into test pit through fine Sand lens aT a depth of 3.5'. TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIAT[ONS GROUNDUATER USED 7' LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MED(UM O NOT ENLOUNTERED � 2.5� TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20Y, F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER f/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (SOJ 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WFTER BN = BROLIN NORTH E%CAVATION EFFORT RND � 35 - 50% YEL = VELLOU Completion 3.5' VOLUME _ _cu.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFlCULT G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. iP-115 Engineers/Scientists SHEET No. �� Former Tanner Site FILE N0. —T5772 T � ea o Y a em eu amps lre CHKD. BY: �— I EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT -GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem � LONTRALTOR ENPRO DATE OS/06/93 OPERATOR eor e ic er GROUND ELEV. uEATHER Partly SunnY. 70s MAKE ase TIME STARTED —T�6Z1� . CA7AC cu. . REACN � TIME COMPLETED —TUL� � DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESLRIPTION GID EXLAV. BOULDERS: REMNRK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) CLASS S-1 8lack, fine to coarse SAND, tittle Silt and Gravel, Little (-) Roots. ND E None 1. 1� S-2 ND E 20(+)A 2' Broun GRAVEL, some fine to coarse Sand, trace Silt (many E 20(*)A 2.,3. 3' Cobbles). E 20(+)A 4' Bottom of Test Pit at 4�. 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 10' 11' 12� 13' 14' ' �5 16' REMARKS: �, � 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Grounduater observed at a depth of 3'. � TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER LLASS GROPORTIONS A88REVIATlONS GROUNOWATER � USED 7.5' LETTER 512E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED � 3.5' TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELFPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO � C 36" AND LARGER F/C = fINE TO CORRSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROWN NORTH EXCAVATION EFfORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLOW ' VOIUME _ _cu.yd E-----EASY Completion 3' M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. � PROJECT iE57 PIT N0. TP-116 Enaineers/Scientists SHEET N0. T�F—T— Former Tanner Site FtLE N0. �3172-� ea o Y a em. eN amp5 tre CHKD. BY: —67A— EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.TilleY:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/06/93 OPERA70R eor e ic er GROUND ELEV: WEAiHER Partty Sunny, 70s MAKE ase TIME S7ARTED —TII3� � CAPAC cu. . REACH --TT�L TIME COMPLETED —fl�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMFRK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) CLASS - Dark broun to black, tine to coarse SFND, some(-) Silt, SF 5-1 0.5' lit[le Raa[s. ND 26, 1C 1. 1' SA 38, 2C 2. 2' SA Broun, fine to medium SAND, trace Sitt (numerous Cobbles and 3B, 3C 3' several Boulders observed). S-2 ND 3. 4� Botiom of Test Pit at 4�. 5' b' 7' 8' 9' 10' 11' 12, 13' 14' 15' 16� � REMARKS: , 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Grounduater observed at 2.8'. 3. Lar9e boulders evident belou excavation; evident from backhoe. ' TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CIASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATER - USED 6.5' LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MED NM O NOT ENLOUNTERED � 2.5' TRACE (TR.) 0 ' 10% L = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36° LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO � . C 36" AND LARGER F/L = fINE TO LOARSE READING GROUND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BRONN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - SO% YEL = YELLOW Comptetion 2.5' ' VOLUME _ _cu.yd E-----EASY M-----MOOERATE D-----DIFFICULT ZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROdECT TEST P[T N0. iP-117 ngineer5/Scientists - SHEET N0. T6�'r Former 7anner Site FRE N0. �3172T ea Y a em. eu amps ire CHKD. BY: �7A— E%LAVATION EOUIPMENT . �ZA REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DATE OS/06/93 OPERATOR eor e ic er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Partiv Sunny, 60s MAKE ase TIME STARTED �� - CAPAC cu. . REACH �� TIME COMPLETED �— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK ' N0. READING EFFORT CWNT/ N0. (ppn) CLA55 Btack to dark 6roun, fine to coarse SAND, little(�) Silt, � �� 5-1 0.5' trace(t> Grave L No uone 1. S-2 Z Broun, fine SAND, trace Silt and Gravel. ND None 2� � 5-11A 3' Broun GRAVEL and COBBLES, sane(+) Silt, little fine to coarse 5-10 2. 4� SaM (several pockets of black and gray, fine to coarse Sand) 5' 6' Bottom of Test Pit at 6'. 7' 8' 9' 10' 17' 12' 13' 14' 15' 16' REMARKS: 1. Refer [o Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log iP-100. 2. Grounduater observed at 4�. � TEST PIT PLAN � BOULDER CLA55 PROPORTIONS ABBREVIqTI0N5 GROUNDNATER USED b' LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED � DES[GNATION LLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) N0T ENCWNTERED z� TRACE (TR J 0 - 10Y, C = COARSE p 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE REFDING GRWND- SOME (S0.) 20 - 35� GR = GRAY (HWRS) NATER BN = BRONN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YELLON Completion 4' VOLUME _ _cu.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D----DIFF[CULT � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. �ROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-118 En9ineers/Scien[ists . SHEET N0. T-6�'r Former Tanner Site FILE N0. �5172-'� ea v a em, eu amps �re CHKD. BY: �— EXCAVATION E�UIPMENT , G2A REP. R.iillev:mem CONTRRCTOR ENPRO DATE OS/06/93 OPERATOR eor e t[ r GROUND ELEV. uEATHER Partiv Sunnv. 60s MAKE ase . TIME STARTED —TZLS— CAPAC cu. . REACH —T�� TIME LOMPLETED —'f3'f� DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIGTION PID E%CAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. - READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. (ppn) LLASS S-7 0.5' Black, fine to medium SAND, some Silt, little Roots. ND 1, 1' S-2 Black, tine to coarse SAND, trace Silt. 1.5' ND — z� Reddish-broun, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL, trace(+� Silt. 2.,3. 3� S-3 ND 4' Bottan of Test Pit at G'. 5' b' 7� 8' 9� 10' . ��' �Z� � 13' 14� I 15 16' � REMARKS: ' 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Grounduater observed at 2.5'. 3. Cobbles observed at 2' +. � � TEST PIT� PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDNATER USED I �� 7' LETTER 512E RANGE F = FINE O ENLOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFILATION M = MEDIUM (X) NOT ENCWNTERED �z TRACE (TR.) 0 - 70Y C = COARSE q b" - 18" V = VERY EIAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" � LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20Y F/M = FINE TO MED NM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- ' SOME (S0.) 20 - 35� GR = GRAY (HOURS) uATER 8N = BROWN NORTH EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 507 YEL = YELLOLI Completion 2.5' � VOLUME = cu.yd E-----EASY � — M-----MODERATE D-----DIFFICULT ZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJEC7 TEST PIT N0. TP-119 n ineers Scientists SHEET N0. �� former Tanner Site FILE N0. �3172T ea Y a em, eu amps ire CHKD. BY: ��— EXCAVATION E�UIPMENT 2p REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO DA7E OS/06/93 OPERATOR eor e ic er GROUND ELEV. WEATHER Partiv Sunnv. 60s MAKE ase TIME STARTED �— . CAPAC tu. . REACH —17T T(ME COMPLETED �fLZ� DEPTH SAMPIE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT LOUNT/ N0. � (ppn) CLASS Black [o dark broun, fine to coarse SAND, some Silt, trace ND E 1-2A 1. '� 1� S-1 Roots and Gravel. 7.5' E 1-2A � z 3 Broun, fine to coarse SAND, sane Gravel, trace Silt. ND E 1-2A 3' S-2 '� E None 4' Broun, fine to medium SAND, trace Silt. None 5' None 6' 6.5' S-7A 7' uone 8' ND None 9� S-9 Broun, fine to coarse SAND arM GRAVEL, trace Silt (numerous Cobbtes). None 10' None 2.,3. 11' — 12' Bottan of Test Pit at 11.5'. 13' 74' 15� 16' REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remark No. 1 on Test Pit Log TP-100. 2. Excavation continuously tollapsing at it�. 3. Grounduater observed entering the test pit at ii'. - TEST 71T PLAN BOUlOER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIAT[ONS GROUNDLIATER USED 8' LETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED � DESIGNATION CUSSIFICATION M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED z� TRRCE (TR J 0 - 10% C = COARSE q 6�� • ig�� V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH ' B 18" - 36° LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20% F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND IARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND- — SOME (S0.) 20 - 35% GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BRONN NORTH E%CAVATION EFFORT RND 35 - 50� YEL = YELLON Completion it' VOLUME = tu.yd E----EASY � � M""'MODERATE � D-----DIFFICULT APPENDIX E � . � � � ! � � i � � � �' � � � S � � � � � ' � � � � � 1 �� APPENDIX E ', CHEMICAL SCREENING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS I � � � � � ' ' � , � � ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 � � GZA PCB SCREENING � PROJECT: - SALEM, MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG SAMPLE ID: TP-101, S-3 DATE SAMPLED: 5/5 &6/93 � MATRIX: SOLID DATE TESTED: 5/12/93 LABORATORY#: 05122 DILUTION FACTOR: 1 � I ; CONCENTRATION QUANTITATION LIMIT POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ; uglkg or ug/1 ug/kg or ugll ; ;� AROCLOR 1260 ND 50 �� AROCLOR 1254 ND 50 AROCLOR 1248 ND 50 � AROCLOR 1242/1016 ND 50 � AROCLOR1232 ND 50 AROCLOR 1221 ND 50 � � �, COMMENTS: ,� � ANALYZED BY: n�G,'Z��,��c,�•r REVIEWED BY: 4//,. /� �¢�'� iGU �! , � ' i �' � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 � GZA PCB SCREENING PROJECT: - SALEM, MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG SAMPLE ID: TP-102, S-3 DATE SAMPLED: 5/5 &6/93 � MATRIX: SOLID DATE TESTED: 5/12l93 LABORATORY#: 05723 DILUTION FACTOFI: 1 ' ' CONCENTRATION QUANTITATION LIMIT � POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ; ug/kg or ugll u kg or ug/1 : � AROCLOR 7260 ND 50 I, � AROCLOR 1254 ND 50 AROCLOR 1248 ND 50 � AROCLOR 1242/1076 ND 50 �� AROCLOR 1232 ND 50 AROCLOR 1221 ND 50 � � COMMENTS: �� ANALYZED BY: �� 6��c�.�- ��-�� REVIEWED BY: �� /� � f �(/ � � � � i�' ' ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 , GZA PCB SCREENING ' PROJECT. -• SALEM, MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG SAMPLE ID: TP-107, S-2 aATE SAMPLED: 5/5 &6/93 ' MATRIX: SOLID DATE TESTED: 5/12/93 LABORATORY#: 05121 DILUTION FACTOFi: 1 ' ', ', ; CONCENTRATION QUAN7ITATION UMIT: POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ug/kg or ugll ug/kg or ugli ,: ' AROCLOR 1260 ND 50 ' AROCLOR 1254 ND 50 AROCLOR 1248 ND 50 ' AROCLOR 1242/1016 ND 50 ' AROCLOR 1232 ND 50 AROCLOR 1221 ND 50 ' , COMMENTS: t IANALYZED BY: �f.�' �iuz�;G REVIEWED BY: ¢��_ ��.� ,��. ' , 1 ' 1 ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ; , 320 NEEDHAM STREET NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 , HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/ml-Aqueous) 1 PROJECT: - SALEM, MA i , FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBEAG , DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 , ' DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 SdMPLE 10: !; METHOD ' MW-1 ' ', ; ',BLANK ' , G7A LAB NO'. 052593-QC 0931 S-PHC ' 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <0.25 <0.25 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A N/A ' 3. MATRIX N/A AQUEOUS � 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUCn 0.25 0.25 ' S. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.01 0.01 , 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TER P H ENYL) 100% 81.9% ,, QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A ' 1 ANALYZED BY: \l—' ;.r -�C.c:_c.�'f REVIEWED BY:4'�Lf�� ' � ' ' i ' ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTFiY LABORATORY ' 320NEEDHAM STREET NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 ' HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTIN6 MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/ml-Aqueous) ' PROJECT: - SALEM, MA ' FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 ' DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 SAMPLE ID: i METHOd : MW-7 ' , , 'BIANK , GZA LAB NO: 052593-QC 09316=PHC ' 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <0.25 12 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A N/A ' 3. MATRIX N/A AQUEOUS ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUCT) 0.25 025 ' S. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.01 0.01 ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENYL) 100% 110% ' QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A ' ' ' �, / �� ANALYZED BY: ._;��C[zC. �c_ � �c=�.E REVIEWED BY: �_ 7 ' ' ' � ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 ' HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/ml-Aqueous) ' PROJECT: - SALEM, MA , FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 ,� DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 SAMPLE Id: : METHOD PS-2 ' ; ',BLANK , ; GZA lAB NO'. 052593-QC 89317-PHC , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <0.25 <0.25 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A N/A ' 3: MATRIX N/A AQUEOUS ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 0.25 0.25 , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.01 0.01 ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TER PH ENYL) 100% 116% , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A ' i f_ �,�. ,��t .�[c�e. � ��il/Q� , ANALYZED BY: ; , REVIEWED BY: -[�— 1 ' � ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 , HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM MEfHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/ml-Aqueous) 1 PROJECT: - SALEM, MA , FILE NO.: 1317�.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 ' DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 SAMPLE ID: 'i METHOD +< GZ-2 ' ', ;BIANK ,: GZA lAB NO: 052593-QC 09319-PHC , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <0.25 <0.25 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A N/A ' 3. MATRIX N/A AQUEOUS ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 0.25 0.25 , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.01 0.01 � 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENYL) 100% 109% , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A � , , ANALYZED BY: � 1� " �''`� REVIEWED BY: ��_ �` 1 ' ' II'i ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY t 320 NEEDHAM STREET NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 ' HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/ml-Aqueous) ' PROJECT: - SALEM, MA , FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 ' DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 SAMPLE ID: `METHOD!; GZ-4 , ; '; BLANK ' GZA LAB NO. 052599-QC 09320-PHC ' 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <0.25 0.44 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A N!A ' 3. MATRIX N/A AQUEOUS ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 0.25 025 ' S. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.01 0.01 ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENYL) 100% 96.1% , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A � ' . � � / . �.Y' . � ANALYZED BY. ,`%��E�r-��E' REVIEWED BY. �/.�� 4 / � , , , ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 � HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/ml-Aqueous) 1 PROJECT: - SALEM, MA , FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5121/93 ' DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 SAMPLE ID: ! MEfHOD < GZ-5 ' , BLANK ! G�4lAB NO, 052593-0C 0932f-PHC ' 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <0.25 <0.25 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A N/A , 3. MATRIX N/A AQUEOUS ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 0.25 0.25 , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.01 0.01 , 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TER PH ENYL) 100% 57.1% ' QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A ' , � �' ANALYZED BY: ��1�'� �`�'1"� REVIEWED BY: ,' ' I ' � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATOFiY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 ' EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/I -Aqueous) , PROJECT: - SALEM,MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG ' SAMPLE ID: GZ-5 DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATETESTED: 5/25/93 LABORATORY#: P1910 DILUTION FACTOR: 1 , TpHGET COMPOUND LIST OUANT. TARGET COMPOUNO UST t�UANT: 8240 COMPOUN6S CONC. LIM(T 824Q COMPOUNUS: CONC. LIMR ' DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 10 ; BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CHLOROMEfHANE ND 10 ::i: 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL EfHER ND 5 VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10 i' 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBFq ND 10 � BROMOME7HANE ND 10 :t:: cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 CHLOROETHANE ND 10 :::>TOLUENE ND 5 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 20 :":trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 � ACROLEIN ND 50 :<; 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ACETONE ND 50 3�: 2-HEXANONE(MBIQ ND 10 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ;::iTETRACHLOROETHENE ND 5 , METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 5 ::: DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CAR80N DISULFIDE ND 10 ::::CHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ACRYIONITRIIE ND 50 ::::: ETHYL BENZENE ND 5 , METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER(MTB� --12-- 10 :::; m&p-XYLENES ND 5 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ��i>; o-XYLENE ND � 5 VINYL ACETATE ND 10 ::: STYRENE ND 5 , 7,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 :e: BROMOFOFiM ND 5 2-BUTANONE(ME{Q ND 50 ;:�; 1.1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ;';'; 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 CHLOROFORM ND 5 ::: 1,3-DICHLOP.OBENZENE ND 5 ' 1;1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 :;:;: 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND 5 RECOVERY LIMR ' ' 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 SURROGATES % % BENZENE --11-- 5 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 88.7 76-114 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :::TOLUENE- D8 101 88-110 ' 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5 ::::: 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 104 86-115 COMMENTS: ' � ANALYZED BY: REVIEWED BY: �, J��l�� Su� ��v I � � ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LA80RATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 , EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS II CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/l - Aqueous) , PROJECT: -SALEM,MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG � SAMPLE ID: MW-1 DATE SAMPLED: 5l21/93 MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATETESTED: 5/25/93 LABORATORY#: Pt906 DIIUTION FACTOR: 7 , TARGEf COMPOUND LIST OUANT. TARGEf COMP�UNO UST OUAP(T. 8240 COMPOUNDS CO�IC. LIMR . 8240 COMPOUNDS: CbNC. LIM(T � , DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 10 ::;i BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CHLOROMETHANE ND 10 !:: 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER ND 5 � VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10 ;':4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(Mi81� ND 10 BAOMOMETHANE ND 10 < cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 CHLOROETHANE ND 10 �:4TOLUENE ND 5 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETH/INE ND 20 ;`trens-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 , ACROLEIN ND 50 ::`! 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ACETONE ND 50 ::;<2-HEXANONE(MBFQ ND 10 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ::': TETRACHLOROETHENE --BMOL-- 5 ' METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 5 ? DIBROMOCHLOflOMETHANE ND 5 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 10 .;r: CHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ACRYLONITRILE ND 50 :<:' ETFIYL BENZENE ND 5 , METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER(MTB� ND 10 : m&p-XYLENES ND 5 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :': o-XYLENE ND 5 VINYL ACETATE ND 10 `::: STYRENE ND 5 ' 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND S :::: BROMOFORM ND 5 2-BUTANONE(MEI� ND 50 :1:: 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ;:;:; 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ' CHLOROFORM ND 5 :;r 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 :;i; 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5 . RE£OVERY LIM(T i � 1,2-U:�:HLOROETHANE ND 5 I SURROGATES ,j I 96 ,% 6�Ne'.cNE ND 5 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 99.9 76-114 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ':::TOLUENE- D8 103 88-110 � 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5 (';4-BROMOFLUOROBEN2ENE 104 86-115 COMMENTS: 1 , ANALYZED BY: REVIEWED BY: �. i� (� I , � � � IGZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. , ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 , EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/l - Aqueous) � PROJECT: -SALEM,MA � FILE NO.: 13172.1 PRWECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG SAMPLE ID: MW-7 DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATETESTED: 5/25/93 LABORATORY N: P1908 DILUTION FACTOR 1 tFRRGEFCOMP�UNDUST QUAN'f. TpHGE7COMPbUNDLIST. QUAPlT: 824Q COMPOUN6S ; ;WNC. LMAR 824D COMPOUN0.S: CONC. LIMR ; � DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 10 r.'; BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CHLOROMETHANE ND 10 �::: 2-CHLOROEfHYL VINYL EfF1ER ND 5 , VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10 ';;4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBIQ ND 10 BROMOMEfHANE ND 10 ::: cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 CHLOROETHANE ND 10 :::TOLUENE ND 5 � TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 20 ; trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 ACROLEIN ND 50 ::::: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ACETONE ND 50 i 2-HEXANONE(MBIQ ND 10 ' 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ;'TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 5 MEfHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 5 :;:! DIBROMOCHLOROMEfHANE ND 5 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 10 <;:CHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ACRYLONITRILE ND 50 ::::: EfHYL BENZENE ND 5 , METHYL tert-BUIYL ETHER(MTB� --10-- 10 m&p-XYLENES ND 5 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :::< o-XYLENE ND 5 VINYLACETATE ND 10 :::;STYRENE ND 5 , 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ;;; BROMOFORM ND 5 2-BUTANONE(MEFQ ND 50 �: 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :;:' 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 , CHLOROFORM ND 5 :s:: 1,3-DICHLOAOBENZENE ND 5 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 :::;: 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ,;: CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND 5 ' RECOVERY LIMR ` � 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 I SEIRROGl+TES ; 96 % BENZENE ND 5 t,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 89.4 76-t14 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :€ TOLUENE- D8 102 88-110 � 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5 :': 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 103 86-115 COMMENTS: ' ' ANALYZED BY: REVIEWED BY: �� 1 �� ', � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAI.CHEMISTRY LABORATORY I � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 , EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/I - Aqueous) � PROJECT: -SALEM,MA FILE NO.: 13772.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG ' SAMPLE ID: PS-2 DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 MATRIX: AOUEOUS DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 LABORATORV#: P1909 DILUTION FACTOR: 1 ` 7ARGET COMPQUND LIST OUANT. TAHGEF COMPOUNO UST C�UANT:. 8240 COMPdUNdS : CO�IC. LIMfT 8240 COMPOUNDS ; CONC. LIMR ' _ :' __ __ � DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 10 ;t BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CHLOROMETHANE ND 10 ::::: 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER ND 5 , VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10 ?4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBIQ ND 10 BROMOMETHANE ND 10 ':;:;cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 CHLOAOETHANE ND t0 ::<iTOLUENE ND 5 � TRICHLOAOFLUOROMETHANE ND 20 :trens-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 ACROLEIN ND 50 : 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ACETONE ND 50 :,: 2-HEXANONE(MBIQ ND 10 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ::i:TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 5 III , METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 5 :::; DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 10 ::i:CHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ACRYLONITRILE ND 50 :::; ETHYL BENZENE ND 5 ' METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER(MTB� --92-- 10 ; m8p-XYLENES ND 5 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :s o-XYLENE ND 5 VINYL ACETATE ND 10 :; STYRENE ND 5 � 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 :i< BROMOFORM ND 5 2-BUTANONE(MEiQ ND 50 :€:: 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ;:;;; 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 � CHLOROFORM ND 5 :i;': 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 :;:: 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 __ __ CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5 . RECOVERY LIMIT ',,I � 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 SURflOGATES 96 % ' BENZENE ND 5 1�,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 �94.4 76-114� TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :!;::TOIUENE-D8 104 88-110 , 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5 :'>4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 104 86-115 COMMENTS: � � ' ANALYZED BY: REVIEWED BY: �/ -�G(.Q� � �s� � ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 EPA METHOD 150.1 - pH AND 120.1 - CONDUCTIVITY � PROJECT: - SALEM/PEABODY � FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATE SAMPLED: 5/24/93 LABORATORY#: 01254 DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 ICORRECTED ': SAMPLE ID pH, CONDUCTIViTY aSlcm ! i ,. GZ_, s.26 659 2. GZ-3 6.50 197 � 3. GZ-6 7.17 705 a. MW-1 6.11 316 � 5. MW-2 6.45 193 6. MW-3 6.46 492 � �. MW-6 5.93 2,100 8. MW-8 7.06 957 li ' 9. MW-9 6.89 1,200 10. PS-1 6.75 411 � t1. PS-4 6.71 � 403 i2. PS-7 6.93 575 � � 13. 14. , 15. 16. i � 77. 18. I , 19. I 20. ' ANALYZED BY: �. ` REVIEWED BY: /�� `��'`"�'�� -n, f � � � , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 EPA METHOD 150.1 — pH AND 120.1 — CONDUCTIVITY � PROJECT: - SALEM/PEABODY � FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 LABORATORY #: 01252 DATE TESTED: 5/24/93 ' CORRECTED + SAMPLE ID pH CONDUCTI�ITY oS/cm � t. GZ-2 6.65 753 2. GZ-4 7.05 569 � 3. GZ-6 7.01 562 4. MW-1 6.20 284 ' S. MW-5 7.12 242 6. MW-7 6.67 1,755 � 7. PS-2 7.39 1,256 S. � 9. 10. 11. 12. , 13. 14. � 15. 16. � � t7. 18. � 19. 20. ' ANALYZED BY: ��' • REVIEWED BY:�j, �� 'Lzc��.� zci ' ,I � , GZA GEOENVIAONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 �, HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/g-Solid) � PROJECT: -- SALEM, MA � FILE NO.: 13172.7 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLEO: 5/5&6/93 , DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 SAMPLE ID 'I > METHOD TP-108, S-2 :: � BLANK ' GTA LAB Np. ' '057393-QC RO560-PHC i , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <10 <10 i2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 92% i , f 3. MATRIX N/A SOIL � � 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUCT) 10 10 ' S. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 � 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TER P H ENYL) 64.5% 77.7% , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A ' � , 1 ANALYZED BY: �!�'%,� � ,� REVIEWED BY: _��/� � � � � , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 � HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/g-Solid) � PROJECT: - SALEM, MA � FILE NO.: 131%2.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/5&6/93 ' DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 SAMPtE ID ' METHOp TP-t08, S-3 � ; ', BLANK', ; GZA LAB Np. 051393-QC R0577-PHC � 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <10 430 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 82% t3. MATRIX N/A SOIL I � 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 10 10 I� , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 , 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENYL) 64.5% DILUTED OUT I � QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A ' � � ANALYZED BY: '1 ;' �,L�� REVIEWED BY: 5�, / �i•. "vv ✓ � � � � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS L.ABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 � EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/kg - Solid) IPROJECT: PROJECT MGR.: C. IINDBERG FILE NO.: 1317z.i DATE SAMPLED: 5/05/93 � SAMPLE ID: TP-102,S-3 DATE EXTRACTED: 5/11/93 MATRIX: SOLID DATE TESTED: 5/12/93 LABORATORY N: 86221S . DILUTION FACTOR: 125 ' TARGEf COMP�UND UST �UANT. TARGEf COMPOUND GST �UANT: " 8240 COMPOUNDS i CONC. LIMIT 8240 COMPOUNOS: 1 CONC. LIMfT ' � DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 1 250 �'� BROMODICHLOROMEfHANE ND 625 CHLOROMETHANE ND 1,250 ::: 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER ND 625 � VINYL CHLORIDE ND 1,250 �;�4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBln ND 1,250 BROMOMETHANE ND 1,250 ::cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 625 CHLOROETHANE ND 1,250 ::<i TOLUENE ND 625 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 2,500 #:; trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 625 � ACROLEIN ND 6,250 �:I;� 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 625- ACETONE ND 6,250 :: 2-HEXANONE(MBIQ ND 1,250 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 ::: TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 625 ' MEfHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 625 �?f. DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 625 CAR80N DISULFIDE ND 1,250 i::'.CHLOROBENZENE ND 625 ACRYLONITRILE ND 6,250 ::::: ETHYL BENZENE ND 625 , METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER(MTB� NO 1,250 ::<; m&p-XYLENES ND 625 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 :s o-XYLENE ND 625 VINYL ACETATE ND 1,250 'i::: SNRENE ND 625 , , 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 625 : BROMOFORM ND 625 2-BUTANONE(MEI� ND 6250 �:- 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 625 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 I;;� 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 � CHLOROFORM ND 625 ' 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 1,1,7-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 625 :: 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND 625 RECOVERY I LIMR " � 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 625 { SURROGATES ;96 % BENZENE ND 625 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 96.6 70-121 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 625 ::;TOLUENE- D8 99.8 81-117 � 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 625 i:;4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DILUTED OUT ' 74-121 COMMENTS: " The surrogate recovery of 4-Bromofluorobenzene was diluted out due to the presence of � • an elevated level of petroleum product. , ANALYZED BY: � REVIEWED BY: �� ' r �� GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 ,. MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS � CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/kg - Solid) ' PROJECT: PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG FILE NO.: 13172.1 DATE SAMPLED: 5/OS/93 � SAMPLE ID: TP-107,S-2 DATE EXTRACTED: 5/11/93 MATRIX: SOLID DATE TESTED: 5/12/93 LABORATORY#: 86211S DILUTIONFACTOR: 725 '' TARGEF COMP�UNU LIST �UANT. TARGEf COMPOUND LIST I �UANT. ' 8240.COMPOUN6S �f ,'CONC. -�LIMfT ' 8240 COMPOUN�S: CpNC. '�tIMR ; , DICHIORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 1 250 ! BROMODICHLOROMEfHANE ND 625 CHLOROMETHANE ND 1,250 :::� 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER ND 625 ' VINYLCHLORIDE ND 1,250 ;;?4-ME7HYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBIQ ND 1,250 BROMOMETHANE ND 1,250 ::;cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 625 CHLOROETHANE ND 1,250 ;:::TOLUENE ND 625 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 2,500 :;I:: trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 625 � ACROLEIN ND 6,250 :'::: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 62S ACETONE ND 6,250 :: 2-HEXANONE(MBFq ND 1,250 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 :>TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 625 � MEfHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 625 :i DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 625 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 1,250 !::;: CHLOROBENZENE ND 625 ACRYLONITRILE ND 6,250 ::::: ETHYL BENZENE ND 625 , METHYL tert-BUTYI E7HER(MTBE� ND 1,250 ?:�� m&p-XYLENES ND 625 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 :;<: o-XYLENE ND 625 VINYL ACETATE ND 1,250 'i.> STYRENE ND 625 � 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 625 ;': BROMOFORM ND 625 2-BUTANONE(MEIQ ND 6,250 s; 1 1,2,2-TETRACHlOROETHANE ND 625 cis-1,2-DICHLOAOETHENE ND 625 :`:; 1,4-DICHlOROBENZENE ND 625 � CHLOROFORM ND 625 :;:;: 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 625 :;:;: 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 625 RECOVEHY LIMR: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 625 ' 'SURROGATES ! 46 % �, BENZENE ND 625 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 106 70-i21 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 625 ::s TOLUENE- D8 94.2 81-117 � 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 625 i;;i 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DILUTED OUT ' 74-127 COMMENTS: ' The surrogate recovery of 4-Bromofluorobenzene was diluted out due to the presence of , an elevated level of petroleum product. � ANALYZED BY: ��/� REVIEWED BY: �� 7i(� � � � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ', 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS �' CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/kg- Solid) , PROJECT: PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG FILE NO.: 13172.t DATE SAMPLED: 5/O5/93 � SAMPLE ID: TP-101, S-3 DATE EXTRACTED: 5/11/93 MATRIX: SOLID DATETESTED: 5/11/93 LABORATORY#: B6207S DILUTION FACTOR: 125 � TARGEf COMPOUND LIST �UANT. TARGEf COMPDUND LIST, QUANT. 8240 COMPOUNDS CONC. LIMtT 8240 COMPOUNDS: CONC. LIMIT � DICHLORODIPLUOROMEfHANE ND 1 250 �� BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 625 CHLOROMETHANE ND 1,250 'r.i 2-CHLOROETHYI VINYL ETHER ND 625 � VINYL CHLORIDE ND 1 250 :4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(Mi81q ND 1,250 BROMOMETHANE ND 1 250 :cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 625 CHLOROEfHANE ND 1,250 .;TOLUENE ND 625 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 2,500 ::i' trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 625 � ACROLEIN ND 6,250 :;; 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 625 ACEfONE ND 6,250 :;: 2-HEXANONE(MBIQ ND 1,250 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 '::::TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 625 � METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 625 �:��t DIBROMOCHLOROMEfHANE ND 625 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 1,250 :-:s CHLOROBENZENE ND 625 ACRYLONITRILE ND 6,250 i;';! ETHYL BENZENE ND 625 � METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER(MTB� ND 1,250 �:< m&p-XYLENES ND 625 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 :;::: o-XYLENE ND 625 VINYL ACETATE ND 1,250 :'::: STYRENE ND 625 ', 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND 625 :: BROMOFORM ND 625 2-BUTANONE(MEIQ ND 6,250 ::��:': 1,1,2,2-TETRACHlOROETHANE ND 625 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 625 �';;�.: 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 ,� CHLOROFORM ND 625 . 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 625 : 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 625 CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND 625 RECOYERY -:�LIMIT`� � 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 625 SUAROGATES °6 °.6 ' BENZENE ND 625 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 92.7 70-121 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 625 :':TOLUENE-D8 987 81-117 � 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 625 ';'; 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DILUTEDOUT ' 74-121 COMMENTS: ' The surrogate recovery of 4-Bromofluorobenzene was diluted out due to the presence of ' an elevated level of petroleum product. � , ANALYZED BY: ��5�%'� REVIEWED BY: % G r � PROJECT: - SALEM,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FILE NO.: 13172.1 ENVIfiONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB � PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREET DATE SAMPLED: 5/5 8 6/93 NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE TESTED: 5/11/93 IGZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOII (CONCENTRATION - PPB, ug/kg of wet soil) �' SAMPLE ID: MetAod TP-101. TP-102. TP-105. TP-108. SP-109. : METHOD ' Blank 5-2 S-4 ' S-t + 5-2 ; S-1 DEIECTION . � LABORATORY#: OL050-B 4L050-S 4L051-S 4L053-5 4L054-S 4L055-5 ; LIMR 1.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 2.TRICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 3. 7,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 4.ci51,2-DICHLORETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 5.trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 6. VINYL CHLORIDE _ ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 8. 7,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 10. CHLOROEfFiANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 11. METHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 � 12. BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 13.TOLUENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 � 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 15. m,p-XYLENES ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 16. o-XYLENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 , � 17.ACEfONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 18. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 19. METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 r20. METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 21. CHLOROFORM ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 � 22. CARBON TETRACHLOiiIDE ND ND Np ND ND ND 20 23. FREON 113 ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 24. CHLOROBEN2ENE ND NO ND NO ND ND 5.0 25. STYRENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 I �' TOTAL COMPOUNDS(1-25) ND ND ND ND ND ND II � METHANE(VN-air,PPM) ND <10 ND ND ND ND 10 PPM � UNKNOWNS(#) :�(1) .:(58) �� (40) � (1) � (t) � (1) , , COMMENTS:The pattern of the chromatograms tor samples"TP-101,S-2" and "TP-102,S-4" indicates the presence of an unknown petroleum distillate. Trace to low levels of one(1)early eluting unknown compound,which can be tentatively identified as methanol,were detected in the Method 81ank and in samples"TP-101,S-2";"TP-102,S-4";"TP-105,S-1"; "TP-108,S-2" and "TP-109, S-t". Methanol is a laboratory artifact that is inherent to this method and is mast likely not � present in the Method Blank or in the above noted samples. Results are reported with two significant digits. � ANALYZED BY: ,' i ; -,;..� ,`,�,,, REVIEWED BY: � � � _. _i �,:�, � �� r�- �� PROJECT: -SALEM,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL,INC. FILE NO.: 13172.1 ENVIRONMENTAL(:HEMISTRY LAB � � PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREET DATE SAMPLED: 5/5 8 6/93 NEWfON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE TESTED: 5/11f93 � GZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOIL (CONCENTRATION - PPB, ug/kg of wet soil) �' SAMPLE ID: Method TP-113. TP-114, TP-116, TP-117, TP-NS. : MEfHOD Blank 5 2 IS-t I S-2 51 ' S-2 ; DElECT10N � LABORATORY+W OLO50-B 4L056-5 4L057-S 4L058-5 4L059-S OLO60-S ; LIM(T 1.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND ND � ND ND ND 10 2.TRICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 3. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 4.cis 1,2-DICHLORETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 5.trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE NO ND ND ND ND ND 10 6. VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 8. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 10. CHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 11.METHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 , 12. BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 13.TOLUENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 ,�� 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 15. m,p-XYLENES ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 16. o-XYLENE ND ND ND ND ND NO 5.0 � 17. ACETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 78. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 19. METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 I20. METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 21.CHLOROFORM ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 � 22. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 23. FREON 113 ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 24. CHLOROBEN2ENE NO ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 � 25. STYRENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 TOTAL COMPOUNDS(1-25) ND ND ND ND ND ND � METHANE(VN-air,PPM) ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 PPM UNKNOWNS(l� (') ('' (" (1) (') ('' � COMMENTS:Trace to low levels of one(t)early eluting unknown compound, which can be tentatively identified as methanol,were detected in the Method Blank and in each of the above noted samples. Methanol is a laboratory artifact that is inherent to this method and is most likely not present in the Method Blank or in the above noted samples. Results are �' reported with two significant digits. � ANALYZED BY: � �� j fiEVIEWED BY: �C��_ �_ �_ �. �.� C-�� : ��,� �- � PROJECT: -SALEM, MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL,INC. FILE NO.: 73172.1 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREET `� DATE SAMPLED: 5/5&6/93 NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE TESTED: 5/12/93 � GZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS �N SOIL (CONCENTRATION - PPB,ug/kg of wet soil) ,�, SAMPLE ID: Metnod TP-102, TP-106. < METHOD` : Blank ;S-t S-t f DEfECTiON LABORATORY N: QLOS�-B 4L066-S 4L067-S LIMtT ,'; 1.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND --770-- ND 10 � 2.TRICHLOROETHENE ND --170-- ND 10 3. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND 10. �� 4, cis 1,2-DICHLORETHENE ND --140-- ND 10 � 5.trans 1,2-DICHIOROETHENE ND ND ND � 70 � 6.VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND ND 10 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND 10 8. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND 10 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND 20 � 10. CHLOROETHANE ND ND ND 10 __ __ _ ___ __ � 1 t. METHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER ND ND ND 5.0 12. BENZENE ND ND ND 5.0 13.TOLUENE ND ND ND 5.0 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND ND 5.0 �� 15. m,p-XYLENES ND ND ND 5.0 16. o-XYLENE ND ND ND 5.0 � 17.ACETONE ND ND ND 5.0 18. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND ND 5.0 19. METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ND ND ND 5.0 � 20. METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND ND 10 21. CHLOROFORM ND ND ND 20 22. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND ND ND 20 23. FREON 113 ND ND ND 10 � 24. CHLOROBENZENE ND ND NO 5.0 25. STYRENE ND ND ND 5.0 � TOTALCOMPOUNDS(1-25) ND 1,100 ND METHANE(VN-air, PPM) ND ND ND 10 PPM � UNKNOWNS(#) ND ND ND �' COMMENTS: Result5 are reportfld with two significant digits. � '� ANALYZED BY: % 1--��.;L( ;'� �`� `""!, REVIEWEO BY: ��C, � '- � � GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAI.CHEMISTRY LABORATORY 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 � � GZA GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS � IN AQUEOUS AND/OR SOLID MATRIX � QUALITY CONTROL �.. DATE: 5/11/93 � � AQUEOUS _ __ _. . __. DUPUCATE SPIKE ' ;� MATRIX SPIKE ACCEPTANCE I PERCENT' ACCEPTANGE ' ' COMPOUNDS RECOYERY(9'0) LIMITS(Wo) ,', DIFFERENCE"(96) LIMITS(%) ' � Trichlorcethene 82 70-130 2.5 35 �� Toluene 76 70-130 1.3 35 � � SOLID ' DUPLICATE SRIKE � MATRIXSPIKE ACCEPTANCE '. PERCENT' ACCEPTANGE ' ^ COMPOUND$ ! RECOVERY(Wu) LIMITS(9'0) ; DIFFERENCE'(4b) UMITS(%) 'i �r Trichloroethene 107 70-130 1.9 35 � Toluene 109 70-130 0.91 35 �I � � � � PROJECT: - SALEM,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FILE NO.: 13172.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB �� PROJECT MGR: C. urvDeERG 320 NEEDHAM STREET MATRIX: SOIL NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE SAMPLED: 5/586/93 I' ,� DATE TESTED: sn3/93 GZA GC SCREENING FOR SEMI—VOLATILE ORGANICS � (CONCENTRATION-PPB ug/kg-SOLID or ug/l-A�UEOUS) SAMPLE ID: METHOD TP-107,S-2 TP-701,S-3 TP-f02,S-3 TP-105,S-1 MEfHOD �' � ' BLANK I �UANT. LABORATORY NO. 051393-B R0587-S R0585-S 09222-S H0574-S LIMR POLYAROMATIC �� HYDROCARBONS 1. NAPHTHALENE ND ND' ND' ND' 200 10 I'I � 2. ACENAPHTHYLENE ND ND ND ND ND 10 3. ACENAPHTHENE ND 120 1,300 3,000 94 10 4. FLUORENE ND 200 800 920 120 10 5. PHENANTHRENE ND 290 3,500 1,200 1,200 �0 , � 6. ANTHRACENE ND 150 1,100 3,100 180 t0 ;` 7. FLUORANTHENE ND 340 2,400 9,400 3,500 10 i� 8. PYRENE ND 390 2,500 � 13,000 3,700 10 9. BENZO-A-ANTHRACENE ND ND 910 10,000 2,300 10 10. CHRYSENE ND ND 560 8,200 1,800 10 11. BENZO-B-FLUORANTHENE ND ND 1,500 8,000 2,400 10 12. BENZO-K-FLUORANTHENE ND ND 1,500 7,700 1,600 10 13. BENZO-A-PYRENE ND ND ND 3,300 150 10 ��1 14. INDENO-1,2,3-cd-PYRENE ND ND ND 3,700 1,100 10 PHTHALATES � 1. DIMEfHYL PHTHALATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 � 2. DIETHYL PHTHALATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 3. DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 � 4. BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 5. BIS 2-ETHYL HEXYL ND ND ND ND ND 20 PHTHALATE � 6. DIOCTYL PHTHALATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 ADIPATES � 1. DI-N-HEXYL ADIPATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 2. BIS 2-ETHYL HEXYL ADIPATE ND ND ND ND ND 20 TOTAL COMPOUNDS ND 1,500 16,000 71,000 18,000 �' SURROGATE RECOVERY 64.5°b 80.9�k DIL. OUT DIL. OUT 76.2 � COMMENTS: " Naphthalene may be present in the above noted samples but its detection has been obscured by the presence of elevated levels of petroleum present. �� ANALYZED BY: ��u;�,� REVIEWED BY:�,'b� �l-�6�___ � � � , PROJECT: � - SALEM/PEABODY,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FILE NO.: 13172.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB � PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREEf DATE SAMPLED: 5/24/93 NEV✓TON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 � �II GZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER (CONCENTRATION - PPB, ug/L) - I � -:SAMPLE ID: Methad MW-9 �:�-GZ-3 ': MW-2 �. PS-7 :> PS-4 �� - MEfHOD �' � '� ��. �'�. Blank _ ,; _ ; DETECTION I LABORATORY#: OL432-B 4L433-A 41434-A �'. 41435-A -- 4L437-A 41438-A L�MIT '� 1.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 2.TRICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 I �j 3. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 70 �i 4.cis 1,2-DICHLORETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 5. trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 , '�,�� 6. VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 �.. � 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 8. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 _ 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 � tO. CHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 11. METHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER ND �ND �� ND ND ND �� ND� 30 12. BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 13.TOLUENE ND ND ND ND ND ND SA � '�, 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 15. m,p-XYLENES ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 � 16. o-XYLENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 17. ACETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,000 18. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,000 � � 19. METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 200 20. METHYLENE CHLORIDE �ND ��ND � ND ND ND� ND 50 � , 21. CHLOROFORM ND ND ND ND ND ND 50 ,� 22. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 50 23. FREON 113 ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 24. CHLOROBENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 i� 25. STYRENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � TOTAL COMPOUNDS(1-25) ND ND ND ND ND ND METHANE(V/V-air, PPM) ND 3,700 <10 ND <10 12 10 PPM UNKNOWNS(N) ND ND ND ND ND ND �� COMMENTS: Results are reported with two significant digitS. � ANALYZED BY: r , REVIEWED BY: y�, / , q �J!/C!%Lf/ 7-�u.i�xX.��_ � � '' , �I PROJECT: - SALEM/PEABODY,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FILE NO.: �3172.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREEf DATE SAMPLED: � 5/24/93 NEWfON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 � 0 GZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER �1 (CONCENTRATION - PPB, ug/L) SAMPLE:10: Method GZ-t 'MW-8 1 MW-6 ! PS-7 , GZ-6 METHOD ', _ . . . _ _ _ � Blank ' DETECTION LABORATORYlY OL432-8 4L439-A 4L44U-A �:4L441-A ' 4L442-A 4L443-A LIMR ... ._ .. .... .. i.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 70 � 2.TRICHIOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 v 3. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 4.cis 1,2-DICHLORETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 5. trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 6. VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND ND � ND ND ND 10 � 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ��ND � ND ND ND � ND 10 - � 8. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 '' 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 � tO. CHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 11. METHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER ND �ND �� ND ND � ND � ND� 30 12. BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 ��, 13.TOLUENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 � 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 � 15. m,p-XYLENES ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 �� 16. o-XYLENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.0 ` 77. ACETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,000 � 18. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND NO 1,000 � 19. METHYL IS08UTYL KETONE ND ND ND ND ND ND 200 20. METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 50 21. CHLOROFORM ND ND ND ND ND ND 50 I .� 22. CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 50 � �� 23. FREON 113 ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 24. CHLOROBENZENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 � 25. STYRENE ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 TOTALCOMPOUNDS(t-25) ND ND ND ND ND ND ,� METHANE(V/V-air, PPM) ND ND 3,800 ND ND 11 10 PPM UNKNOWNS(#) ND ND ND ND ND (2) �' COMMENTS:Trace levels of two early eluting unknown compounds were detected in sample GZ-6 that are � possibly products ot microbial degradation. Results are reported with two significant digits. � � ANALYZED BY: �� REVIEWED BY: ��, /� � � �/� 2[/Q � � � � PROJECT: - SALEM/PEABODY,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FILE NO.: 13172.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB . PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREET � DATE SAMPLED: 5/24/93 NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 0216a DATE TESTED: 5/25/93 � GZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER ,� (CONCENTRATION - PPB, ug/L) '� `SAMPLEID: MethOd MW-3 MEfHOD f: � '�, Blank _ DETECTION LABORATORY N: OL432-B 4L455-A LIMR 1.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND � 10 � 2.TRICHLOROETHENE ND ND .10 3. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND 10 4. cis 1,2-DICHLORETHENE ND ND 10 � 5.trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND 10 ` 6.VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND 10 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ND 10 � 8. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND 10 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND 20 10. CHLOROETHANE ND ND 10 �, 11. METHYL-t-BUTYL ETHER ND ��ND 30 12. BENZENE ND ND 5.0 �y 13.TOLUENE ND ND 5.0 � 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND 5.0 75. m,p-XYLENES ND ND 5.0 ,� 16. o-XYLENE ND ND 5.0 . 17. ACETONE �� ND ��ND 1,000 �� 18. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND 1,000 19. METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ND ND 200 20. METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND 50 21. CHI.OROFORM ND ND 50 � 22. CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND ND 50 �' 23. FREON 113 ND ND 10 24. CHLOROBENZENE ND ND 10 ��, 25. STYRENE ND ND 10 TOTAL COMPOUNDS(1-25) ND ND �' METHANE(VN-air, PPM) ND ND 10 PPM UNKNOWNS(#) ND ND , COMMENTS: Results are reported with two significant digits. � � ANALYZED BY: ��1�� REVIEWED BY: '� � c�G � ' PROJECT: - SALEM,MA GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FILE NO.: 13172.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LAB � PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG 320 NEEDHAM STREET DATE SAMPLED: 5/5&6/93 NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 DATE TESTED: 5/t 1/93 1 GZA GC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER ' (CONCENTRATION - PPB, ug/L) ':SAMPLEID: Method TP-107 ':TP-101 i TP-108 �� MEfHOD t: , _ ��_ Blank �I. ��; '�, DETEC710N�. LABORATORY M: OL047-B 4L047-A 41048-A -- 4LQ49-A � LIMtT 1.TETRACHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND 10 � 2.TRICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND 10 3. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND 10 4.cis 1,2-DICHLORETHENE ND ND ND ND 10 � ' 5.trans 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND ND ND ND 10 6. VINYL CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND 10 ,. ' 7. 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ��ND ��NO �� ND ND �10 8. 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND 10 9. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND 20 ' 10. CHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND 10 71. METHYL-t-BUNL ETHER ND ND ND ND 30 12. BENZENE ND ND ND ND 5.0 , 13.TOLUENE ND ND ND ND 5.0 14. ETHYL BENZENE ND ND ND ND 5.0 15. m,p-XYLENES ND ND ND ND 5.0 ' 16. o-XYLENE ND ND ND ND 5.0 17.ACEfONE ND ND ND ND 1,000 , 18. METHYL ETHYL KETONE ND ND ND ND 1,000 19. METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ND ND ND ND 200 20.METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ND ND ND 50 , 21. CHLOROFORM ND ND ND ND 50 22. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND ND ND ND 50 23. FREON 113 ND ND NO ND 10 ' 24.CHLOROBENZENE ND ND ND ND 10 25. STYRENE ND ND ND ND 10 1 TOTAL COMPOUNDS(1-25) ND ND ND ND METHANE(VN-air, PPM) ND 5,200 5,000 440 10 PPM ' UNKNOWNS(1� ,(44) �28) �13) �', ._ : COMMENTS:The pattern of the chromatograms for samples"TP-107", "TP-101" and "TP-108" indicates the presence ot an ' unknown petroleum distillate such as a fuel oil. Some of the above listed compounds may be present in sample"TP-107" but their detection has been obscured by the complex nature of the chromatogram. Results are reported with two significant digits. ' � ' ANALYZED BY: j'�/��,�// REVIEWED BY: '�, /�� / v,r, 'N/ ' I'i I GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. , ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 ' HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/g-Solid) , PROJECT: - SALEM, MA ' FILE NO.: 13::�.1 PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/5&6/93 , DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 SAMPLE ID i:METHOD TP-101, S-3 ! ' ; ; BLANK ; ; ' GZA LAB NO. 051393-QC R0585-FP ' ', , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT G10 1,600 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 72% , ' 3. MATRIX N/A SOIL ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 10 10 , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 �I ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENYL) 64.5% DILUTED OUT I , QUALITATIVE IDEN7IFICATION: The characteristics of the chromatogram for sample TP-101, S-3 indicate the presence of a petroleum product in the boiling range of mineral spirits. The presence of 16ug/g total polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAH's) I ' indicate that products of incomplete combustion are also present. � 1 I � ANALYZED BY: ��t�=�� REVIEWED BY: c ,/�, /� � #%ljf/ � ' APPENDIX F � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � � � � � � , , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTA�CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 ' HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/g-Solid) , PROJECT: - SALEM, MA , FILENO.: '3172.1 � PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/586/93 I , DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 � SAMPLE ID I METHOQ TP-102, S-3 :': � ! ', BLANK ; GZA LAB NO. 051393-QC 09222-F'P , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <10 7,900 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 52% ' 3. MATRIX N/A SOIL ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 10 10 ' S. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENYL) 64.5Mo DILUTED OUT ' , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: The characteristics of the chromatogram for sample TP-102, S-3 indicate the presence of a petroleum product in the boiling range of mineral spirits. The presence of 71 ug/g total polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAH's) ' indicate that products of incompiete combustion are also present. , ' ANALYZEDBY: �� ' cJl-<��^^ REVIEWEDBY: c ,/"v� ✓ � ' , ' , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 , HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM MEfHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-ug/g-Solid) , PROJECT: - SALEM, MA ' FILENO.: 1H3i�. i PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/5&6/93 , DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 SAMPLE ID : METHOD TP-107, S-2 ' , ! BLANK', ' ' G7A Lk8 NO. 051393-QC R0587-FP ' , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <10 120 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 85% ' 3. MATRIX N/A SOIL ' 4. DETECTION IIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 10 10 , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TERPHENY�) 64.5% 80.9% , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: The characteristics of the chromatogram for sample TP-107, S-2 indicate the presence of a petroleum product in the boiling range of mineral spirits. The presence of 1.Sug/g total polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAH's) , indicate that products of incomplete combustion are also present. , ,�� ANALYZED BY: (/ ��;, , � ,� I/� REVIEWED BY: �� ' �t�-1(�lit- �I �2f/� i t ' ' ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 i , HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING II MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM-uglg-Solid) ' I PROJECT: - SALEM, MA � , FILENO.: i3172.1 � PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/5&6/93 , DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 �, SAMPLE fD MEiHOD TP-114,S-t ` ' ; ' BLANK, ', I GZA UCB NO. 057393-QG R0576-PHC I , 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <10 130 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 79% � ' 3. MATRIX N/A SOIL II ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUC� 10 10 , 5. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 ' 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O-TER P H ENYL) 64.5% 71.4% ' QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A , ' ' � ANALYZED BY: I,��,i,IGcL�C,I REVIEWED BY: �� l� ''�i�/ i ' ' ' IGZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 , HYDROCARBON FINGERPRINTING MODIFIED ASTM METHOD D3328 CONCENTRATION (PPM—ug/g—Solid) t PROJECT: — SALEM, MA , FILE NO.: 13772.i PROJECT MGR: C. LINDBERG DATE SAMPLED: 5/58�6/93 , DATE TESTED: 5/13/93 SAMPLE ID METHOD TP-1I13,S-2 ' ', BIANK', ' ' G7A LAB NO. 051393—QC R0575—PHC ' � ' 1. HYDROCARBON CONTENT <10 47 2. PERCENT SOLID CONTENT N/A 90�/a , 3. MATRIX N/A SOIL ' 4. DETECTION LIMIT (TOTAL PRODUCI) 10 10 I ' S. DETECTION LIMIT (INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBONS) 0.5 0.5 II � 6. SURROGATE RECOVERY (O—TERPHENYL) 64.5% 87.6% i , QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION: N/A � , , ,,� ' ANALYZED BY: /1��,t� REVIEWED BY: I ✓' ��,�.�.�_ � � ' , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 ' EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GCIMS CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/I - Aqueous) ' PROJECT: -SALEM,MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG ' SAMPLE ID: GZ-2 DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATETESTEO: 5125/93 LABORATORY#: P1905 DILUTION FACTOR: 1 , TARGET COMPOUND LIST OUANT. TARGEf COMPOUND UST QUANT. 8240 GOMPOUND$ : CONC. LIMR 8240 COMPOUNDS: CONC_ LIMIT , DICHLORODIFI.UOROMETHANE ND 10 <':! BROMODICHLOROMEfHANE ND 5 CHLOROMETHANE ND 10 :4!2-CHLOROEfFIYL VINYL EfHER ND 5 , VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10 ;;4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBFQ ND 10 BROMOMETHANE ND 70 ;::cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 CHLOFOEfHANE ND 10 `:I:TOLUENE ND 5 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 20 :'::: trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 ' ACROLEIN ND 50 ;:;; 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 - ACETONE ND 50 :::: 2-HEXANONE(MBiq ND 10 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 `:::TEfRACHLOAOETHENE ND 5 , METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 5 :::; DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 10 ::€CHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ACRYLONITRILE ND 50 ':: ETHYL BENZENE ND 5 ' METHYL tert-BUTYL E7HER(MTB� --16-- 10 =:" m8p-XYLENES ND 5 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ::: o-XYLENE ND 5 VINYL ACETATE ND 10 3<: STYRENE ND 5 ' 1,1-DICHLOROEfHANE ND 5 ; BROMOFORM ND 5 2-BUTANONE(MEFQ ND 50 :';:'�. 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 ::: 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 , CHLOROFORM ND 5 . 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ; 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 < CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND 5 RECOVERY 'LIMIT { ' 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 SURFlOGATES % % ' BENZENE ND 5 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 100 76-114 TRICHLOROEfHENE ND 5 ::: TOLUENE- D8 102 88-110 � 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5 ;:::`4-BfiOMOFLUOROBENZENE 104 86-115 COMMENTS: � � , ANALYZED BY: REVIEWED BY:�C,��__ �S� � ' , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ' 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO.: MA092 , EPA METHOD 8240 ANALYSIS FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GCIMS CONCENTRATION (PPB-ug/l - Aqueous) � PROJECT: SALEM,MA FILE NO.: 13172.1 PROJECT MGR.: C. LINDBERG � SAMPLE ID: GZ-4 DATE SAMPLED: 5/21/93 MATRIX: AQUEOUS DATETESTED: 5/25/93 LABORATORY q: P1907 DILUTION FACTOR: 1 ' TAR6ET COMPOUND LI$T WAWT. TARGEf COMPOUND LIST OUANT. ;824000bIPOUN0.S ��; :CONC. iIMfT 824000WPOUN6S; CONC. LIM(T �, � DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND 10 ::: BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CHLOROMETHANE ND 10 ;:!; 2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL EfF1ER ND 5 ' VINYL CHLORIDE ND 10 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE(MiBFq ND 10 BROMOMETHANE ND 10 'cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 CHLOROETHANE ND 10 >: TOLUENE ND 5 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND 20 ;:>:trans-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND 5 , ACROLEIN ND 50 i: 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ACETONE ND 50 :`:' 2-HEXANONE(MBIQ ND 10 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 'i:!TETRACHLOROETHENE ND 5 , METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND 5 :`' DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND 5 CARBON DISULFIDE ND 10 ::<: CHLOROBENZENE ND 5 ACRYLONITRILE ND 50 ::::: EfHYL BENZENE ND 5 � METHYL tert-BUTYL E7HER(MTB� --13-- 10 �:�� m8p-XYLENES ND 5 trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ND 5 i< o-XYLENE ND 5 VINYL ACETATE ND 10 ':::< STYRENE ND 5 � 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND S : BROMOFORM ND 5 2-BUTANONE(MEIQ ND 50 :�� 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND 5 cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHEhE ND 5 :';:; 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 I , CHLOROFORM ND 5 ': 1,3-DICHLOAOBENZENE ND 5 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND 5 : 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ND 5 CARBON TEfRACHLORIDE ND 5 RECOVERY I�AIT ; , 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND 5 ', SURROGATES I % % ' BENZENE ND 5 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE- D4 90.6 76-114 TRICHLOROETHENE ND 5 :;:TOLUENE- D8 103 88-110 j ' 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND 5 ::; 4-BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 102 86-115 COMMENTS: ' , ANALYZED BY: REVIEWED BY: //„ �� Lv Q�:"k,� � ' , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 MASSACHUSETTS LABORATORY I.D. NO. MA092 ' EPA METHOD 8240/8260 ANALYSIS PURGEABLES IN AQUEOUS AND/OR SOLID MATRIX � QUALITY CONTROL DATE: 5/11193—GILBERT ' AQUEOUS � MATRIX SPIKE ACCEPTANCE DUPLICATE SPIKE ACCEPTANCE ' CQMPOUND RECOVERY'(%) L1M1TS(46) DIFFERENCE(9ba LIMIT$(Wo) ; , 1,1—DICHLOROETHENE 108 60-120 5.71 20 TRICHLORETHENE 108 70-130 1.87 20 � TOLUENE 90.5 70-125 0.55 20 ' S OLID MATRIX SPIKE ACCEPTANOE DUPLICATE SPIKE ACCEPTANCE III � ! COMPOUND ' AECOVERY';(9io) LIMITS(9�0) DIFFERENCE (9b) LIMITS(9U) , 1,1—DICHLOROETHENE --- 60-120 35 • I � TRICHLORETHENE --= 65-130 =_= 35 TOLUENE 65-125 35 I , METHOD BLANK LABORATORY NO.: 66199 I , TOTAL COMROUNDS DEYEC7ED ND IRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE ; SURROGATES : (96) ' UMITS(940) , 1,2—DICHLOROETHANE—D4 100 76-114 TOLUENE—DS 93.9 88-110 , 4—BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 96.5 86-115 , , � , GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY � 320 NEEDHAM STREET, NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA 02164 � GZA GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS IN AQUEOUS AND/OR SOLID MATRIX , QUALITY CONTROL DATE: 5/25/93 ' � AQUEOUS _ _ , ' OUPLICATE SPIKE j MATRIX SPIKE ACCEPTANCE : PERCENT ACCEPTANCE COMPOUNDS : RECOVERY(%) LIMITS(a/o) ' DIFFERENCE;(a/o) LIMITS(%) '; , Trichloroethene 78 70-130 14 35 ' Toluene 78 70-130 14 35 � � SOLID ' ! DUPLICATE SPIKE ; MATRIX SPIKE ACCEPTANCE ! PERCENT' AGCEPTANCE : COMPOUNDS RECOVERY(%) CIMITS(4�0) ,' DIFFERENCE(%) LIMITS(Wo) ': � � Trichloroethene --- 70-130 --- 35 � Toluene --- 70-130 --- 35 � ' ' � � � ' I � � � � r � � APPENDIX F I � CONTRACT LABORATORY RESULTS I ' � ' � , � � � , 1 � Matrix Anal ical Inc. Y� � I 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01745 1&10 3-MATRIX � Clientlnforynation � Accounh GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Projec[Name: .(13172.1)(5-1A-93) Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number: 13172.1 New[on Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. , Sampler Name: GZA Sample Inforynation � [ab ID: 31442855-0O1 Date Sampled: OS/21/93 : Client ID: GZ2 Date Received: OS/IA/93 :0 I Matrix: Warer Date Reported: 06/O8/93 � Decect�on Method�:� Data.� Analytiwl Parameter Result '�. Unit '�. Limit Na �.�� Analyst Analyzed�� SAMPLE PREPARATION Metal Digestion OS/24/93 3015 � Mercury Digestion 06/Ol/93 7470 TRACE METAIS . � A:senic ND mg/I 0.005 206.3 th OS/31/93 � Barium 0.08 mg/I 0.01 ?00.7 th 06/OS/93 Cadmium 0.001 mg/I 0.001 2132 bg OS/26/93 Chromium ND mg/I 0.005 ?18.2 da 06/Ol/93 �', t' Lead 0.003 mg/I 0.001 239.2 bg 06/O1/93 , Mercury ND mg/1 0.001 245.1 mm 06/01/93 , Selenium ND mg/I 0.005 270.3 th OS/31/93 Silver ND mg/I 0.02 200.7 th 06/OS/93 � ,. , � � � , Page 1 i � Matrilc Malytical, Inc. 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton, MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX � Client Information � Acmunt G7A GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Pcoject Name: (13172.1)(S-7A-93) Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number: 13172.1 Newton Upper Fails,MA 02164 Project Manager. Sampler Name: GZA , Sample Infonnation , Lab ID: 31442855-002 Date Sampled: OS/21/93 : . Qient ID: GZ-4 Dare Received: OS/24/93 :0 Matrix: Water Date Reported: 06/O8/93 � Demc4on � Method'��. � Date. AnalyticalParameter Result �-� Unit �� Limi[ . �-.� No. Analy3t Analyzed , �� .. . .. .. __.. ,... . . . SAMPLE PREPARATTON Mecal Digation OS/?A/93 3015 � Mercury Digestion 06/Ol/93 7470 TRACE METAIS � � Arsenic ND mg/1 0.005 . 206.3 th OS/31/93 � Barium 0.05 mg/I 0.01 200.7 th 06/OS/93 . Cadmium 0.002 mg/I 0.001 213.2 bg OS/?6/93 , Chromium ND mg/I 0.005 2182 da 06/Ol/93 Lead 0.002 mg/I 0.001 239.2 bg 06/03/93 - Mereury . ND mg/I 0.001 ?A51 mm 06/Ol/93 Selenium ND � mg/I 0.005 2703 th OS/31/93 � Silver 0.06 mg/I 0.02 200.� th 06/OS/93 � � ' ' , ' � , Page I 1 � Matri�c Analytical, [nc. 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton, MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX � ' Client Infomiotion � AccounC GZA GeoEnvironmen[al,Inc. Projec[Name: (131721)(5-24-93) � Address: 320 Needham Street Project Numbec 131721 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. � Sampler Name: GZA SampJe Infom�ation � Iab ID: 31442855-004 � Date Sampled: OS/21/93 : Client ID: G�5 Dare Received: OS/7A/93 :0 Matrix: Water Date Reported: 06/08/93 � 'Detecnon Method� � �Date� Analyticat Paramemr Resu�t ` Unit�_ � Limit -� No. Analyst Analyzed � SAMPLEPREPARATION � Metal Digestion OS/7A/93 3015 Mereury Digestion 06/Ol/93 7470 TRACE METALS � � Arsenic 0.006 mg/I 0.005 206.3 th OS/31/93 - - Barium 0.02 mg/1 0.01 200.7 th 06/OS/93 Cadmium 0.001 mg/I 0.001 213.2 bg OS/26/93 �� Chromium 0.036 mg/I 0.005 218.? da 06/Ol/93 � I.ead 0.008 mg/I 0.001 239.? bg 06/Ol/93 Mereury ND mg/I 0.001 ?45.1 mm 06/Ol/93 � Selenium ND mg/I 0.005 270.3 th OS/31/93 Silver 0.04 mg/I 0.02 200.7 [h 06/OS/93 � � � , � 1 � Page 1 l � Matri�c Analytical,Inc. 106 South Stree[ F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX � Client Infomtalion ,� Acmunt GZA GeoEnvironmentai,Inc. Projec[Name: (13172.1)(5-1A-93) Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number. 13172.1 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. Sampler Name: GZA . �� Sample Info�rnation lab ID: 31442855-003 Date Sampled: � OS/21/93 : �� Client ID: PS-2 Date Received: OS/7A/93 :0 � Matrirz: Water Date Reported: 06/08/93 ... . _. ._.. __..... ..___. ..__._ . .. .._. .. . ..._ .._ . . ... .. . _. .. ._. . .. ... .. _ . . . . . .. . _. .. . . . . � r�Detecdon � Method-: ��Daie. Analytical Parameter Result � Umt �� L�miF�� - � � � �Na �� Analyst Ana jzed � SAMPLEPREPARATION� � �..�: . :. � � Metal Digestion - OS/?4/93 3015 Mercury Digestion 06/Ol/93 7470 TRACE METALS �� Arsenic ND mg/1 0.005 20G3 th 0.5/31/93 � Barium 0.01 mg/I 0.01 200.7 th 06/OS/93 Cadmium 0.001 mg/I 0.001 2131 bg OS/26/93 I�I ' Chromium ND mg/I 0.005 218.2 da 06/01/93 Lead ND mg/I 0.001 ?39.2 bg 06/03/93 i Mercury ND mg/1 0.001 245.1 mm 06/Ol/93 � Selenium �ND mg/I 0.005 2703 th 05�31/93 Silver ND mg/I 0.02 ?00.7 th 06/OS/93 �' � � ,� I � ,' ', � Page 1 l � Matrix Analytical, [nc. 106 Sou[h Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX � Client Infomiation � Account: GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Project Name: (13172.1)(5-7A-93) Address: 3?A Needham S[reet Project Number. 13172.1 , Newton Upper Falis,MA 02164 Project Manager. Sampler Name: � Sample Infomtation � Iab ID: 31442855-005 Dare Sampled: OS/21/93 : ' Clien[ID: QC-Report Date Received: OS/24/93 :0 Matrirz: Water Date Reported: 06/OS/93 Comment: Warer � � � ��Detechon- �� Method. �Date�. ' pnalytical Parameter Resuit � Unit � Limit � No..� Malyst An8lyied� DUPL(CA1'E S"I'UDIFS ��r Arsenic Variance: 0 Pement Barium Variance: 0 Percent Cadmium Variance: 0 Percent � Chromium Variance: 0 Percent � . � Lead Variance: 0 Percent Mercury Variance: 0 Percent ;� Selenium Variance:� 0 Percent Silver Variance: 0 Percent MATRIX SPIKE STUDIES-METAIS Arsenic Raovery. 82 Percent Barium Recovery. 95 Percent Cadmium Recwery. 100 Percent I �, Chromium Recovery. 95 Percent Lead Recovery: 90 Percent � Mercury Recovery: 90 Percent - � Selenium Recovery: 88 Percent Silver Recovery: 90 Percent MEI'F[OD SUMMARIES � � Metal analysis is performed on digesred extracts using � Aromic Absorp[ion or ICP Spectroscopy.AA samples are ato- mized using FASfAC auro deposition and are automatically �� deposited into graphire cells or direcHy inro Ilame.ICP samples are automatically sampled,nebulized,and trans- poRed inro the piasma torch.Final results are produced � by auto data/reduction and graphics printer. I� Page 1 ' � � Matrix Malytical,lnc. . 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 ' 1800 3-MATRIX � Client Infonnation � � Accounk GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Project Name: . � (13172.1)(5-21-93) Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number. 13172.1 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. Sampler Name: �, Sanple Infonnation � Iab ID: 31442&SS-(q5 Date Sampled: OS/21/93 : � Client ID: QC-Report Dare Received: OS/24/93 :0 „ Matriz: Water Dare Reported: 06/08/93 Comment: Wate. � :: �: -.. ,. .. . . . ��.Detec[ion ��. Metfiod:�� .�Date� Analytical Paramerer Result Unit :� Limit N¢ � pnaiys[ pnalyied� �� MECEIOD REFERENCES � 1.Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Wasre:Physical Chemical Methods.EPA SW 846.November 1986. 2.Methods For Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA 600/479-200.Revised March 1983. � - � 3.Standard Methods For Examination of Warer and Waztewater.APHA-AWWA-WACF.,16th FAition.1985. �' �� 1 ,1 1 � Page 2 � WHITE COPY� Original(Accompanies Samples) YELLOW COPV- prqect Manager PINK COPY - Lap Fles CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD N° 5 4 8 6 , � ANALYSES REOUIR� s.m i. ��- . c yec o. P Time Beiler IxtorL Locetion t� � G cA� o� Tolal I.D. (tlhr.l � initieb Oencri tion 8empb P�' P� �.0 �h �,� 0� .10 �' ��.Q `Z`�P`Z`G G�`J �G i��' N o( NOtB ..-- P TYP° �'�" 0�' 0� 0� 0� 0� 0`L C�G QG �CG �CQ �CQ Q� �,a � 9�'F`� Cont. # �`" C _ �_c J TAL NUMBER OF ONTAINERS O ISHED B : S� AT IME REC VED BY:(Si �U�e) � NOTES, Preservatives,etc.: G(. � Unless otherwise noted,all VUA vials have been preserved w/i;i HCI in accordance with Mass-DEP Poli c y. NOUISH � , Si gnature D F J T I M E � N E D Y: ' ture) // � �Sy 5 � Gb' ��' / \� /� -�� R LINOUISHE BY:(Signature) ATE/TIME ,��y ` -:��9� /'�„ �// �^ , ••" " �YX 7/i( O � n � `e.c�-1..� RELINOUfSHED BV:(SignaWre) DATE/iIME RECEIVED BY:(Signature) � �NT�Gj �J ��poU�E cno�.c�cur.ronr��.r�� RELINOUISHED BV:(Signature) DATFJiIME RECENED BY: (Signature) �''•�'hP�E CUSTO�Y:��'O'p � � � � � , :�. -- ANALYTICAL LABOR4T0 ; � "��`------ �I GZA FILE NO. � 1 PO. NO. LABOF2ATOFiY CONTPC�. PHON . ' �i PRQ1ECf_ . - ;ZA CONTACf: �: .� v ' �_i GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. �� / �� ' . � ENGINEERSANDSCIENTISTS ��4��`'S--c-��_�1 . � 320 Needhem Siree� C��E��(S) � , �!. � NEVJrpry UPPER P/�LS.MA 02164 - . - . . :T. ��969-0050 DATE�S)OF��ECT�p� — �, �� Fnn(o1n9o5-7769 � SHEET � / � � '•. � � �—�)�--�.'' �—�'—�—�`—� -- —� —�' � i� l � Matrix Analytical, [nc. 106 Sou[h S[reet F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1 S00 3-M?,TRIX ' Clientlnformation � Account GZA GeoEnvimnmental,Ina � Project Name: {13172)(OS-11-9 Address: 320 Needham Street Projut Number. 13172 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. D.Adilman Sampler Name: GZA ' Sanpl¢InfOrmation t I�b ID: 31311b22-0Ol Date Sampled: � OS/Il/93 : Client Id: TP-107,S2 Date Rceeivcd: OS/11/93 :0 Matriu: Soil - Date Reported: OS/28/93 ' '�. : ' Dececrion Methal '�. Date I Analytical Parameter �: Res�lt : Unit �- Limit No. � Analyat Anal}zed ' I SAMPLE PREPARATION � Metal Digestion OS/12/93 3051 Menury Digestion OS/25/83 7470 TRACE METAIS ' Acsenic 16.3 mg/kg OS 7061 th OS/17/93 - Barium 30 mg/kg lA 6010 th OS/24/93 Cadmium 9.0 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/25/93 I ' Chmmium 725 mg/kg OS 7191 bg QS/25/93 Lead 285 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg OS/21/93 Mercury ND mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 , Selenium ND mg/kg OS 7741 [h OS/17/93 Silver ND mg/kg 2.0 6010 th OS/25/93 ' 1 , ' , ' , Page 1 r � Matrix Malytical, [nc. . 106 South Stree[ F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX ' Client/nfonnation � Accounr. GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Project Name: (13172)(OS-11-9 Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number. 13172 , Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 . Project Manager. D.Adilman Sampier Name: GZA ' Samplelnfonnotion ' Iab ID: 31312622-002 Date Sampied: OS/11/93 : Clientld: 1'P-108,S2 Date Received: OS/11/93 :0 Ma[rix: Soil Date Reported: OS/28/93 1 Decection Method:' Date Aealytical Parameter Re3ult ' Unit �: l,�mit Na '. Anaiyst Anilyzed ' SAMPLEPREPARATION , Me[al Digestion OS/12/93 3051 Mereury Digestion OS/25/93 7470 TRACE METALS , ' Aisenic 355 mg/kg OS 7061 th OS/17/93 � Barium 27 mg/kg 1.0 6010 [h OS/7A/93 Cadmium 48 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/25/93 ' Chromium 725 mg/kg OS 7191 bg OS/25/93 Lead 46.0 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg OS/21/93 Mercury ND mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 ' Selenium ND mg/kg OS 7741 th OS/17/93 Silver ND mg/kg 2A 6010 th OS/25/93 , , ' ' I , . , , Page 1 /�� I � WHITE COPV- Original (Accompanies Samples) VELLOW COPY- Project Manager PINK COW-Lab Fles p'p t A p o . . . IV •7H00 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD D LS ANALYSES REOUIR� � � � � �A; o�a � Total � eampl� Tim� Beiler � Colr'� Loeetion BempN a�L p0 ,�O ,��i ry0 O ,�O V�'G G� �`Q�G�2`G�[�� Z` Q" '�'0�\c'2` v CO� NO�tO -- . I.D. QMr.) � tnitiab De�cription TYW y`1' 0�' 0� 0� 0 �0�' C9 Q 'C 'CQ � Q `j` 9 4 . (� Z— MSO f�ert � 1 � X X x s - �- " X X X � ''� - X X � ti;,ti;s� � X x x ,., . ,: ' X X 3 � � , � - `; �� ` — V � V �,. u�-1 � U - _ ��t w _� I — � X 3 ( . / Z -� .� '�; )( _ k" ' � !l{iti1 - --- - — �.3 l �. TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS._.:_. ._. RELINOUISHED BY:(Signature) DATE/iIME � - R�CENED�BY: (Signature) NOTES,Preservatives,etc.: 3 6 . ' � 1 r � r7_�,,i,�} �, �V .- `� u'��- _;,. Unless otherwise noted,all VOA vials have been preserved w/1:1 HCI In accordance with Mass-DEP Poliiy. ' �Ci � r.:�. . . . �� t^� RE NOIIISPIED BV:(Sig' ture) DATE/TIME RECENED�$Y:(Signature): `, �q�� Wn�11 ` ��.i'c�'cit�, � �� / RELINQUISHED BV:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECENED BY:(Signature � ! RELINQUISHED�BY:(Signature) DATE/TIME f7ECEIVED BY: (Signatur'e) � � REIJNOUISHED BY:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECENED BY:(Signature) - \J�, ANALYTICAL LABOR4TOFV :��+Q''J`�` GZA FILE NO. � �� P.O. NO. LABCHATORY CONTPGT: PHONE: PRQ1ECf__ _ GZACOt�fTACT: L_/�' C.— p(T: L� -�� J LOCATION ��CA�(�r� ��PQ.�u(jl� '� GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ' ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS COUFCiOAIsI M �D � 320 Neatlhem Stieet �L Q �. NEWTON UPPyE�pR�FyApLoLsSo,MA02164 � cj - � S - I 3 SHEET OF � � �q%�l�!'�-T�g� � � �� :) � WHITE COPY - Original (Accompanies Samples) YELLOW COPY- Project Manager PINK COPY- Lab Fles �� ,r�1 .? � A: CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD # O/ZS"Z � � ANALVSES REQUIR� � c � ca. BamPl� Tima Beilar � �I�y l� � G �PA p� p� �s� Total I.D. RMr.) • InXiab Deeeription eTYW~ c�`La g`1•0.�00,��0^�00`t'�00e�g`L��G QG0 GS,�Q�Q�Q G,t,�J � S�FJ�P��\� �ry Con�. NO�fe ?- M•s� �� t1"'��'- � X f J— , k� Y }( �/JP:-. � L 2 X x �( X i "'— �( X X � �"��- s- � l � Y x' � Z-5 I � �' Y �' I - �� x �. ,� � ' TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS RELINOUISHED BY:(Signature) DAT IME RECSEIVEp BY��$ignafu�@j; NOTES;Preservatives,etc.: 1 ` 5-,��-q 3� ( , �-�, 'y� Unless otherwise noted,all VUA vials have been preserved w/1:1 HG in accordance with MassDEP Poli�y. lti 1 .�,�. i t- .'�,/-„-.:r.,. :\ RElJNO IS D B (Si� ure) DATE/iIME..� RECEIVED BY (Stqn'atur�)' �j �L(L� ,;5 �u t-T��-� S�4n.�(�L�-.S 1.��'j �(C;x'rVt'� /U�� F�'r,jL� RELINOU�HED BY:,.Si naNr� � � �� n . . � . ,i; .1_ hf""YI4— ( 9 e) ... DATE/rIME RECENED BY (Signature) J 7 ��P;��-� `;_ Cf.� �� jcP � �>..� C-+'�C -� L�{. �t pf- � , i5�...<✓. *i., a °:.i' � p .-�- r. RELIN�UISHEO�BY:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY:(Signature} i i REl1NQUISHED BV:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECENED BY:(Signature) , ANALYTICA�LABOF34TORV: �"�� GZA FILE NO. ,� �� • 1 RO. NO. LABORATORV CONTPGT: PHONE: pRaECT��,_ ._ GZACONTACf: C iie Gndher � . ocr: 6� �� ler� ,��h�dy GZA GEOENVIRONM NTAL, INC. L�� ENGINEEH3 AND 3CIENTISTS CAL�ECrpq(S) ''l SZ% '+. � M l�. 320 Needhem Sireet NEWrON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 �- „ y ' . � �3 "� _ F (61�969 W50 _ pp�Q�- _ � ! pF �J'� '_`� I �i 1� �/ WHITE COPY- Original (Accompanies Samples) YELLOW COPY- Project Manager PINK COPY-Lab Fles p'O . C A p 5 � CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD �� j - � ANALYSES REOUIR� o a� 8empl� Tima �ibr � �Ir'� Locetion eampM `L O O 0 O O O �'��`Q �P �jG�`� U��P..�Q� p�p{I NOtO -- i.o. Ranr.� � i�rt�ab oexr�pe�o� ryp. y'La�9'L°'001 0010o`ti 000 0'L� VG QGOqG qQ�qQ�Q� ,t,? � S�F.�e �� m Cont. # — _ �''S O ' U � X _tL_� — At�� < � ��- i - ` -- -- Y - Y � . � I z r� � - I �! X �� Y. I ,t.tu;--; � ; ; X � ,� ., )' � � y� S ' � i d1 a � � - � � � �� ' _ .1 ,.�y �! - n �C � Z _ � TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS �I � RELINOUISHED BY:(Signature) DATFITIME RECEIVED BY:(Signature) NOTES, Preservatives,etc.: 1 ' �.,i I ��', �,i ' " 5.- )�_C�� /�: � . � � Unless otherwise noted,all VOA vials have been preserved w/1:1 HCI in accordance with Mass-DEP Policy. v� / n;,.. � i✓�1, M i .� ;; ;'. RELINO ISH€DBY!(Signature) DATE/rIME � �RECENEDBY.(Signature) � � i �?;_(.'_i�E ,�� A�(k:.j'�(�-� '�A+sl�l..L-�S l(�j ,�(�`�JVr:v /j,(�-� �QJ�(� , , ; ;, ' 1'. _ ri0t --- ^ i /�� REIINOUISHED BY:(Signa[ure) DATE/TIME RECENED BV'(Signature) � 7 %j�"'.-�+�f.y.Q C, ri:� o^i; �-t p � ,ri?�� -x t "" I .,..+.. •� r7�t i, `•.P ,V ; .F.. . RELINOUISHED BY:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECENED BY:�(Signature) � - RELINOUISHED BY:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY: (Signature) \ � , ANALYTICAL LABOR4TORV: ��''_�n GZA FIIE NO._ � �, �� ' ` BO. NO. :� � . LABORATORY CONTPG�"T",:� PHONE:_ ppaECT_ GZACONTACT: Crv1 lie Lindher _ ocr: C,=ri =.-.-'. �ocnnori �0.les-„ f��<c..�:;;,�� GZA GEOENVIRONM NTAL, INC. �� .`_� i � �( ` ENGINEERS AND SCIENTI3TS CIX1El.ROFi�S)—, 320 Needhem Streel � NEWTON UP�PE,pR�FpA�LLS,MA 02164 � � �Fnx�s�-n�a � � � `S ' � 1 ' '1 S S�OF 1 � Matr�Malytical,Inc. 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkin[on, MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX ' Client Infomiotion � � Acmun[: GZA GeoEnvironmentai,Inc. Project Name: �13172)(OS-11-9 Address: 320 Needham S[reet Project Number. 13172 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Pmject Manager. D.Adilman ' Sampler Name: GZA Sample Infamatiort ' Iab ID: 31311b22-003 Date Sampled: OS/OS/93 : Client Id: TP-101,S3 Datt Received: OS/ll/93 :0 Matrix: Soil Dare Reported: QS/28/93 ' Detec[wn Method�-'�. Date Analytical Panmerer Resvlt i Unit '�. Limit No. Analyst Anal}zed ' SAMPLE PREPARAT[ON ,' Metal Digestion OS/12/93 3051 Mereury Digestion 0.5/15/93 7470 TRACE MEI'ALS , Arsenic 5.1 mg/kg OS � - 7061 th OS/17/93 � Barium 39 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/1A/93 , Cadmium 5.0 mg/kg lA 6010 th OS/25/93 ' Chromium 12.0 mg/kg OS 7191 bg QS/ZS/93 Lead 38.0 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg OS/21/93 Meicury 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 , Selenium ND � mg/kg OS 7741 th OS/17/93 Silver ND mg/kg 2.0 6010 th OS/25/93 ' � � , ' ' , ' Page 1 l � Matris Analytical,Inc. 106 Sou[h Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1 S00 3-MATRLY � Client Infonnation , Accounr. G7A GeoEnvironmental,Ina Pmject Name: (13172)(OS-11-9 Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number. 13172 New[on Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. D.Adilman � Sampler Name: GZA Sample7nfamation ' [ab ID: 3131?b22-004 Dare Sampled: OS/ll/93 : Clien[Id: TP-102,S3 Datt Received: 0.5/11/93 :0 Matrirz: Soil Date Reported: QS/28/93 � Detection Method�'�. Date Analytical Parameter Result �� Unit �'� Limit No. - Analyst elnalyeed � SAMPLE PREPARATION � Metal Digestion OS/12/93 3051 Menury Digestion OS/25/93 7470 TRACE MEI'AIS � - � Arsenic 19.3 mg/kg OS 7067 th OS/1'7/93 - i Harium 156 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/24/93 Cadmium 10 mg/kg 1.0 6010 [h OS/25/93 ' Chromium 35.0 mg/kg OS 7191 bg OS/25/93 Lead 910 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg OS/?A/93 Lead analysis per(ormed by method 7420. , De[ection Limit is 50.0 mg/kg Mercury 0.6 mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 Selenium 1.0 mg/kg OS 7741 th OS/17/93 , Silver IYD mg/kg 2A 6030 [h OS/25/93 , , i , ' 1 ' Page 1 i � Matriac Analytical, Inc. 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX ' Client Infonnation , AcmunC GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Project Name: (13172)(OS-11-9 Address: 37A Needham Street Project Number. 13172 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Projeci Manager.� D.Adilman ' Sampler Name: GZA Sample Inforynolion � lab ID: 31317b22-00.5 Dam Sampled: OS/11/93 : Client Id: TP-109,Sl Date Received: OS/11/93 :0 Matrirz: Soil Date Reported: OS/28/93 , Decectlon Method�l Date �� Anal}rticat Pacameter Result i Unit '�.Lmit No. Analyst: rinalyzed ' SAMPLE PREPARATION � Metal Digestion OS/12/93 3051 Meccury Digestion OS/25/93 7470 TRACE MEI'ALS , Arsenic . � 135 mg/kg OS 7061 th OS/17/93 � Barium 59 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/1A/93 Cadmium 5.0 mg/kg lA 6010 th OS/15/93 , Chromium 211 mg/kg OS 7191 bg OS/25/93 Chromium analysis pe6ormed by method 6010. De[ection Limi[is 5 mg/kg. 1 I.ead 240 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg QS/21/93 Lead analysis performed by method 7420. � Detection Limit is 50.0 mg/kg. � � Meaury 0.2 mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 Selenium ND mg/kg OS 7J41 th QS/17/93 ' Silver ND mg/kg 2.0 6010 th OS/25/93 , ' ' � � Page 1 i � Matrix Analytical,Inc. 106 South Stree[ F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX , Clientlnfom�ation , AccounC GZA GeoEmironmental,Inc. Project Name: �(13172)(OS-11-9 Address: 320 Needham Street Pmjcct Number. 13172 Newton Upper Falls,��tA 02164 Project Manager. D.Adilman Sampler Name: GZA ' Sample Infomiotion � Iab ID: 3131?b22-006 Date Sampled: OS/11/93 : Clien[Id: TT-113,S2 Dace Received: OS/11/93 :0 Matriz: Soil Date RepoRW: OS/28/93 , Detec[�on Method i Date Analytica�Pacame[er Resuit : Unit r. Limit No, Aealyst Analyzed � �AMPLEPREPARATION , Metal Digestion � OS/12/93 3051 Me�ury Digestion OS/25/93 7470 'I'RACE MEl'ALS� . . , .a��o io.s mp,/� os �o6i cn os/i�/vs Barium 140 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th 0.5/?A/93 Cadmium 11 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/25/93 ' Chromium 179 mg/kg OS 7191 bg OS/25/93 Chromium analysis pedolmed by method 6010. Derection Limit is 5 mg/kg. ' I.ead 590 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg OS/1A/93 Lead analysis pert'ormed by method 74?A. Detection Limit is 50.0 mg/kg. � � Mercury 1.4 mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 Selenium - 0.8 mg/�g OS 7741 th OS/17/93 , Silver ND mg/kg 2.0 6010 th 0.5/25/93 , , , 1 ' Page 1 l � Matrix Analy[ical, Inc. 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton, MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX � Client Information Acmunt: GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Project Name: +13172)(OS-11-9 . ' Address: 320 Needham Street Pmject Number. 13172 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02154 Project Managcr. D.Adilman , Sampler Name: GZA Sanple Infomiation ' Iab ID: 31312622-00'7 Date Sampled: OS/ll/93 : Ciient Id: TP-114,Sl Date Received: QS/11/93 :0 Matriz: Soil Date Reponed: OS/28/93 , ' Detection Method: Date Pina�ytical Pardmeter Resalt I Unit �'� Limit No. i Analyst Anal}aed , SAMPLE PREPARATTON � Metal Digation OS/12/93 � 3051 Mercury Digestion OS/25/93 7470 TRACE METAGS , Arsenic 9.7 mg/kg OS '7061 th OS/17/93 � � Barium 52 mg/kg 1.0 6010 th OS/24/93 Cadmium B.0 mg/kg lA 6010 th OS/25/93 � Chmmium 42.0 mg/kg OS 7191 bg OS/25/93 Lead 7A0 mg/kg 0.1 7421 bg OS/21/93 [.ead analysis perfocmed by method 7420. , Detection Limit is 50.0 mg/kg. Mercury 0.2 mg/kg 0.1 7471 mm OS/25/93 , Selenium ND mg/kg OS 7741 th QS/17/93 � Silver ND mg/kg 2.0 6010 th OS/25/93 , � � ' , � , Page 1 1 � Matrix Malytical, Inc. 106 South Stree[ F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkin[on,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX , C(ient Informarion ' Accounr. GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Project Name: (13172)(OS-il-9 Address: 320 Needham Street Project Number. 13172 Newton Upper Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. D.Adiiman Sampler Name: � Sample Infonnation , lab ID: 31317b22-008 Date SampleA: / / : Client Id: QC-Repott Date Received: / / :0 Matc'uc: Soil Date Reported: QS/28/93 ' Detecuon Me[hod--�. Date Analytical Panmeter Re3nit ��. Unit -�� Limit No. � Analyst Malyzed '' DUPUCAT'E STUDIES � Atsenic Variance: 0 Percent Barium Variance: 10 Pencent Cadmium Variance: 10 Percent Chromium Variance: 13 Percent , I.ead Variance: 2 Pereent � � - Memury Variance: 0 Pereent Selenium Variance: 0 Percent , Silver Variance: 0 Percent MATRIX SPIKE STUDIES-MEI'AIS ' Aisenic Recovery: 111 Pereent Barium Recovery. 90 . Pereent � Cadmium Recovery. 88 Pereent Chromium Recovery 91 Pereent , Lead Recovery: lIXl Penent Mercury Recovery: 110 Percent Seleniom Recovery: 87 Pereent ' , Silver Recovery: 78 Penent METHOD SUMMARIFS . ' � Metal analysis is performed on digested eutracts using Atomic Absoiption or ICP Spectroscopy.AA samplu are ato- mized using FASTAC auto deposition and are automa[ically deposired into�aphite cells or direcdy into Flame.ICP , samplu arc automatically sampled,nebulized,and[�ns- ported into the plasma torch.Final results arc produced . by auro data/reduction and glaphics prinrer. ' , , Page 1 1 � Matrix Malytical,Inc. 106 South Street F I N A L R E P O R T Hopkinton,MA 01748 1800 3-MATRIX � Client Infomiatiort ' AttounC GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Projut Name: . i 13172)(OS-11-9 . Address: 37A Needham Street Projat Number. 13172 New[on Uppe[Falls,MA 02164 Project Manager. D.n:.ilman ' Sampler Name: . Sample Infomiation ' Lab ID: 31317b22-0OS Date Sampled: / / : Client Id: QC-Report Dam Received: / / :0 Ma[riz Soil � Date Reported: OS/28/93 , Detec[ion Method'� Date Analytical Parameter Result -'� Unit �� Limit No. - Analyst Analyzed � MEI'HOD REFERENCFS � '� 1.Test Methodt For Evaluating Solid Waste:Physical Chemical Methods.EPA SW 846.November 1986. 2.Methods For Chemical Malysis of Watcr and Wastu. EPA 600/479-200.Revised March 1983. � 3.Standard Methods For F�camination of Watet and - Wasrewater.APHA-AW WA-WACF.,16th Edition.19BS. � ' 1 ' ' , ' � , Page 2 � � � �. �r � � � i� �■II � � �� r � � WHITE COPY � Original (Accompanies Samples) .YELLOW COPY- Prqecl Managef PINK COPY - Lab Fles � _�2 � CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ' ANALYSES RE-0UIR� . � a �° .� G c°j� G°c q�o� Note Coi- `L O O h o O O ��0� Z�QT�G�`� �'��c Cont. # ' Beiler lactor'� lxetbn BempM b� b '. '� `L � 1 G G G Q Q `r � � � BamPl� Time � Inilieh Dexription TYP^ 4�`L 0`L �O �O �O �O ��I. C� Q �l 'C 'l Q `2` �J F� ' — — — � I.D. (21hr.) - U S �- �s� — I - I 3 - - �- � _ - P� 5 X I 51 - TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINEFS RELINOUISHEO BY:(Signature) DATE/!I E RE IVED BY: ignat ) NOTES,Preservatives,etc.: � i � Unless otherwise noted,all VUA vials have been preserved w�1:1 HCI in eccordance with Mass-DEP Policy. � C C�� ';,�~' RE OUI HED Y: i nature) T IME R E ED � n re) G `5 �� tNfACT BHOKE.Y NOT AP"LICAELE R LI UIS Y:(Signature) AT FECEIVED BY:(Signa COOtf�CU^TODY.EhI.FiEC'D i� l 1 I 1 S.`�IhPLE CUSTOIIY.iEhL flEC'D I 1 I 1 I 1 � RELINOUISHED BY:(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY:(Signalure) �� \ .5�'// - /r3 RELINOUISHED BY:(Signa�ure) DATE/TIME fiECEIVED BY:(Signature) ��(�cf.�i � �a , ,5��5^�S . / S 3, . — s t GZA FIIE NO.� .. y� , � PO. NO. — ',. � ,... ANALYTICAL LABOFi4TORY: . _ (� � � LABORATORY CONTPCT: PHONE: l PR0.IECT_ . _ .._ �. � . - ,�� •.�-•...i i(l 1. II, ` \ � � -..1_.l ::.0�. I � ' GZA CONTACf: � I EXT: LOCHTION�1 k�ANl�r� I GZA GEOENVIRONM NTAL, INC. ��5� ENGINEEHS AND SCIENTISTS _ � � 3N1 Needham Streel SHEET� Of �— � � NEWTON UPPER FALLS,MA 02164 pq7E($)pF CALLECTION � (577�969-0050 . — F,vc�i��s-nss a� GZ� � � � � � � GZA �GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Emgimeers and � Scientists � � � . � � � A Subsidiary of GZA � GmEmironmenral Technolo�es,Inc. � i � / 1 M Equal Oppommiry Emplv�v M/F W H �I , ' � , ..s � .a1 r� 1 Supplemental Information ' Department of Environmental Protection DEP File # 55-369 and # 64-238 t � Super Stop and Shop 1 1 � Peabody/Salem, ' Massachusetts -� `' Prepazed for The Stop and Shop Supermarket Company �' Quincy, Massachusetts .' Prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Watertown, Massachusetts .' ' ' .� �' ' � January 1996 � ::' m , ' Yanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Transportation . land Development � Environmental Services ]Ol Wa1nu[ Strect Post Office Box 9IS I ��y�i�� ' Watertown Massachusetts 02272 EJAN 2 2 1996 617 924 1770 F,ix�n v�4 zz�s S�Eem f'isn��dr�c� s��pt. ' January 18, 1996 ' Ref: 03834 Ms. Rachel Freed ' Environmental Analyst Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 10 Commerce Way , Woburn, MA 01801 Re: Proposed Stop 8 Shop Peabody/Salem, Massachusetts , DEP File#55-369 DEP File#64-238 ' Dear Rachel: Enclosed please find two (2) copies of Supplemental Information that has been requested by ' DEP in a letter dated December 27, 1995. Included in this Information are Water Quality Calculations; Compensatory Flood Storage Calculations; Drainage Calculations for both existing and proposed conditions with a Drainage Sub-area Plan; Closed Drainage System Calculations; Soils Logs with an Exploration Location Plan and a Wildlife Habitat Evaluation. ' VHB has incorporated numerous changes in the proposed drainage system for this submission to address the concerns raised by DEP. These changes include the following: ' • Introduction of a Water Quality Basin. • Revision of the Infiltration System to accept parking lot runoff versus roof runoff. ' • Expansion of the parking lot drain system to include 13 catch basins. $TORM DRAINAGE � ., The Drainage Calculations contain the hydrologic worksheets which indicate the basic assumptions for the times of concentration, soils types, and vegetated cover used to perform the analysis of the existing and proposed conditions. ' The site was designed to mitigate any increase in the peak rate of runoff exiting the site during the 10, 25 and 100-year rainfall events due to the proposed development. Hydrographs were generated using the soil Conservation Services TR-20 Computer Program. Based on site inspection and field survey the following �i -' input parameters were used to generate existing hydrographs. Existing Conditions Hydro raA oh In�ut Parametarc �' Area: 7.61 Acres Curve No.: 90 i ,' Time of Concentration: 0.41 Hours � ��vu�cnN��nrroows�ros+a��errses�aEQatsr.00c t 1 '��=]]]��= Ms. Rachel Freed � Project No.: 03834 ' January 18, 1996 Page 2 ' The tollowing table summarizes the exiting peak rates of runoff from the site for various design storms. I' ' Existinp Peak Rates of Runoff 10-Year 20.0 cfs , 25 Year 23.6 cfs 100 Year 30.6 cis ' The site was then analyzed to determine the peak rate of runoff from the site in the proposed condition. Three(3) sub-areas were created for the analysis;iront parking field, building roof area and rear loading dock area. ' Stormwater runoff from the front parking field sub-area watershed is collected in a closed drainage system and infiltrated through 830 feet of subsurface trenches into the ground. These trenches, are approximately 14 feet wide by 1.3 feet high. They are comprised of three (3) lines of 10-inch perforated PVC pipe II ' surrounded by 3/4 inch crushed stone wrapped by tifter fabric. Extensive soils testing on-sfte indicates predominately sand and gravel soil conditions. Percolation testing 'I ' will be performed to verify the assumed percolation rate of 5 minutes per inch,which is conservative, prior to the start ot construction. If required the infiltration system will be increased The drainage system is designed with a by-pass system through which stormwater will pass when the infiltration trench's capacity is exceeded. This system,which is designed to conveythe 10-.year rainfall eveht without surcharging,ties ', ' intothe proposed 1'x 6'culvert which discharges runoff into the North River CanaL The building roof sub-area is comprised of all areas which are collected in the roof drain system. This II , storm water will be of higher water quality than the paved surface sub-areas because it will not receive the pollutants typically found on pavement. This runoff will be conveyed to the North River Canal via the closed drainage system and the 1'x 6' box culvert. �� ' The rear watershed area is comprised of the Jeffers'property and the Stop&Shop dock area. A grassed swale is proposed to convey runoff from the Jeffers'property to a proposed wet basin. The basin, which will be located northeast of the dock area will be grassed to provide water quality mitigation as well as ' stormwater detention. Stormwater runoff to the dock area will enter the swale and basin via paved swales off the pavement area and a closed drainage system from trench drains. , The following table summarizes the T-20 input parameters for the proposed sub-areas: Pr000sed Conditions Hydrog� h�lnp�t ParamPt rc ' ' ErQ�1 ��n9 Eg.aC Area 3.3 Acres 1.44 Acres 2.87 Acres � Curve Number 93 98 87 Time ot 0.1 Hours 0.1 Hour 0.35 Hour Concentrate ' ' \\VULCAN\WINDOWS\03874\LEITERS\REQRFSP.DOC � I ' i 'T j�'r� Ms. Rachel Freed �j� K Project No:: 03834 'il ' January 18, 1996 Page 3 , The following table summarizes the proposed peak rates of runoff from the site for various design storms. ' Pr000sed Peak Rates of Runoff 10-Year 16.1 cfs � I , 25-Year 19.4 cfs �� 100-Year 26.0 cfs ' A comparison of the summary tables indicates that the proposed drainage system will mitigate any increase in the peak rate of runoff from the site during the 10, 25, 100-year rainfall events. Included on the revised Grading and Drainage Plan are details of the proposed drainage system including a i ' profile of the proposed 6'wide by 1' high box culvert under the railroad bed that discharges into the North River Canal. ' FLOODPLAIN The site is located wRhin the 100-year floodplain of the NoRh River. A review of FEMA flood studies ' indicates that a detailed study was completed for the Town of Peabody while the Town of Salem's flood elevation was determined by approximate methods. The Peabody Study provides a flood profile in the vicinity of the site which varies between 11 and 12 feet. The Salem study indicates a flood elevation of 11 feet. The proposed site was designed to provide an increase in the compensatory storage available up to ' elevation 12. As indicated in the following table the compensatory storage will be provided on a foot by foot basis: ' Comnensatory Storage Summary Table � � � Existina (cfl Proposed fcfl Increase(cf) ' 7-8 Feet 889 3,490 2,601 8-9 Feet 9,137 19,746 10,609 9- 10 Feet 41,030 45,083 4,053 , 10 - 11 Feet 96,094 121,243 25,149 11 - 12 Feet 68,348 176,524 108,176 ' BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTirFS(BMP� The site has also been designed to incorporate BMPs to remove pollutants from the stormwater runoff before it enters the North River Canal ' Runoff from the front parking field will be collected in thirteen (13) catchbasins equipped with 3 foot sedimentation sumps and tees to remove sediments and oils. This runoff will be infiltrated into the ground ' via approximately 830 linear feet of infiltration trenching. ' ' \\VULCAN\WINDOWS\03874\LEITERS\REQRFSP.DOC , ' T 7rrT� Ms. Rachel Freed `/1 � i i Project No.: 03834 ' January 18, 1996 Page 4 ' As shown on the plans, each infiltration trench will be comprised of three 10-inch Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipes surrounded by 14-feet wide by 1.3 feet high washed stone. Each trench will be wrapped in fiker ' fabric to prevent sediments irom entering and clogging the system. The trenches have been sized to contain the first one-half inch of stormwater runoff generated from the front parking field watershed. ' The roof runoff will be conveyed to the North River Canal via the closed drainage system. Because roof runoff is typically of higher quality,this runoff will not be pretreated. ' Stormwater runoff from the Jeffers property will be collected in a closed drainage system which will discharge into a grassed swale leading to a water quality basin located northeasterly of the building dock area. Stormwater runoff collected in the dock area is conveyed via a closed drainage system to an off-line oil/grit separator which outlets to the water quality basin. In addition two small drainage sub-areas ' discharge directly into the drainage swale and water quality basin. The water quality basin is designed, in accordance with standard best management practices, with a ' permanent pool volume greater than the volume of the first one-half inch of stormwater runoff from the watershed. Outflow from the basin is conveyed to the North River Canal via the closed drainage system. ' The Stop&Shop Supermarket Company will ensure the proper operation of these facilities through a program of non-structural BMPs, as outlined below: Winter De-icing of Paved Areas ' In order to provide for public safety during the winter season, the parking areas, walkways and service areas will be sanded as necessary. To minimize the pollutant loading to the North River, only enough ' salt as is minimally necessary to maintain material handling characteristics ("spreadability")will be used. A low-salt, sand-based mixture, containing a maximum of 10 percent salt by volume, is proposed. Stop & Shop has incorporated this policy at all of their stores. ' Pavement Sweeping Program Sediment loading to the catch basins will be reduced through a pavement sweeping program. , Pavement sweeping has been shown to be an effective source reduction management measure by reducing the downstream loading of total suspended solids before they enter the closed drainage system. An effective sweeping program reduces contaminant loading by providing control of ' particulate and adsorbed contaminants at the source, before these contaminants enter the stormwater runoff. Pavement sweeping at the proposed supermarket is proposed to be performed four(4)times per week. ' Collected materials will be properly disposed of in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations. Catch Basin Maintenance ' As previously noted,the catch basins are to be constructed with sedimentation sumps. The capacity of these sumps will be maintained by cleaning them twice annually;once in the fall and once in the spring � to remove accumulated sediments. Catch basin cleaning will be performed by a site maintenance ' \\VULCAN\WINDOWS\Q7834\LETTERS\REQRESP.DOC , �'T ]�rn Ms. Rachel Freed H K Project No.: 03834 1.1L �anuary 18, 1996 ' Page 5 , contrador and all collected material will be disposed of in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. ' Oil and Grit Separator Maintenance � An oil and grit separator will be installed in the rear dock area as part of the closed drainage system. The separator will be inspected twice annually, and cleaned out if required. At a minimum it will be pumped out once a year. The cleaning will be performed by a site maintenance contrador and all � material removed will be disposed of in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations. Drainage Swale Maintenance ' Routine inspections will be made on the drainage swale to ensure that sediments and other runoff materials are not building up, and also to make sure that the grass is not being eroded by the flow of runoff. If there is evidence of damage to the swale, repairs will be made immediately, or if sediment is , building up, the swale will be cleaned by a site maintenance contractor. All material removed will be disposed of in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations. Miscellaneous Site Maintenance ' In addition to the measures outlined above, several other measures to help minimize the potential environmental impacts to the North River will be implemented. ' -- Routinely pick up and remove litter from the parking areas, islands, and perimeter landscape area. , -- Routinely inspect all dumpster locations for spillage. WILDLIFE HABITAT EVALUATION , Also enclosed please find a Wildlife Haliitat Evaluation of the existing conditions on the project site, prepared in memo form by Charles Katuska, a senior environmental scientist possessing the required ' credentials to perform such an evaluation in accordance with 310 CMR 10.59. Based on field inspections, site history, and the provisions of 310 CMR 10.57 et seq., this evaluation concludes that the important wildlife habitat functions of the existing site have been essentially eliminated by human alteration and that the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on the site is not likely to be significant to the protection of wildlife � habitat. ' ' II � \\VULCAN\W INDO WS\03834\LEITERS\REQRF5P.DOC II � ' � TT]]��TT Ms. Rachel Freed � Project No.: 03834 , �•ZL January 18, 1996 Page 6 ' Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. is pleased to provide the additional information requested in your letter of ' December 27, 1995. If you have any questions on the enclosed materials or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at(617) 924-1770. � Very truly yours, ' VA SE A BRUSTLIN, INC. Michael E. McNeice, P.E. I, ' Senior Project Manager I Endosure � cc(w/enclosures): Peabody Conservation Commission Salem Conservation Commission � M. McKnight, Stop& Shop L. Frank, Stop & Shop J. Serafini, Serafini, Serafini 8 Dading ' R. Davis, Goulston &Storrs � 1 � � � � ' ' � ' \\VULCAN\WINDONS\03&74\LEITERS\REQRFSP.DOC ' 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Water Quality Calculations ' , Compensarory Storage Calculations ' Si[e Hydrographs - Existing Conditions ' - Proposed Conditions ' Closed Drainage Calculations ' Wildlife Habitat Evaluation ' Soils I.ogs ' 1 1 , ' , ' I ' v\w�D3834�various4octly.doc l ' ' ' � , ' ' , ' ' ' ' �i ' ' �11 ' I , j ' WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS , ' v�w�A3834�variousVocfly.doc ' ' �D ' r�o;e�c � r�o;�� 3 g 3� Location � Sheet—of— Calculated by Date � L I'�I ' Checked by �� Date ��(1��4• Tide ' ' li ' �DLVM� �f �J�� ST ��fl�iN �D�IT �RKin1E► ��F��S ��i � C�iTF-�I�t � Co,�Ta�� r � ��c+t 1PEt��FIl.� Cqt1f�GU�E1 /I+ZShr1 KJn10ff� I�ieACTIIAL MA�vqL II ' 19� �ua��A� + �y��Nr�� v�A� �sw1P5,C�+flpS ' �o�uwlE % �Z in�k�i �hcti��f- �` �YCA , _ , dq17�X 3,3A� Xq35GOti%c = 5q90 cy ' VOLUWt� Tizb�U( �p"�rAM roP g.83 f��ea/� ' � o ° � v , e , D � 3 x ��Z� �-�i4 X �,33 — �,G�} ,�- ` � °� o 0 0 °° 133�. � o � � -e � o � ad 9 ' -�oT y,5 /.G4 � (,.� �=8-� �4' �k5�� 8,�3 �o% ✓o�t� ' I��E 830 �F 7��c� ' �30� 8�� = G,997 c� ' ��9� > 5590�� Vanasse Hengen Brus111n.Inc. � erN�ea o�rsny�iea raper ' ' '11 j�IB ' Praject Ll�s Project# 3Qj�f- Location ��hhl.�9 Shee[—of Calculated by�i�'� Date � ' Checked by �� Date � � Tide ' , wa1�e Q�n��"(y �Ah/N T�F Cou-r��u�� V�t�� Ru,�oFF � �crrc��. �ha�n� � �]iWNrNH P!N ' v6LUV�� P�E f ��4' 5�zir�G� �� : � i�IcN 0� PuAOt F �i5t�i�iiEl� OJEI� LoA7K1SaTrNC� K/hr�RSIrED ' V= 2,$� Ac x �3yli� �c 0,5 '"�z��'/Fr �'�"Zo9 c� 1 ', � �eKiWtNE� �oo� �1�01.UWIE SFGT�CN 27G5 Ec�vaTranl 7 � z7G5 s� � �3, ' Et-�✓hT►o�l 4 -�. � 1 z4 � �7l¢ �= 3x �27G5 + �7zq-)�z � = G733 cf ' G733 �� > 5 cF 6K � ' ' , 1 ' VanasseHengenBmstlln.lnc. � PrinredonRerytledPaper ' � t r 11D ' �;�� a � It�, �o;�c n 3 3 Location �l'�'7 Sheet of Calwlated by Date �� i G/a 4 , Checked by� Date�� Tide , t `�a�ri��E SE�'aRkTU� '�=�: ��5�ton1 vJ�t�� - �r,rrrN�; `��v�vEcinrEs �e -rr+E T++s��uE�noa , ��'RON � ��Ir/T�Nkrr1(,� br �a� a �IL �'�h�,47b�5� I o�4 Z AT�EiF�'rD ►- G + �B 3 I — 0�7�'G AG 5� C.osED q�t�rJ Cku s ' �iJr�NSrt�/ _ � '"/N� , Q = �ip - ,9 x 1 x .�4G =, G 11 �loww��E = zx Q x �, 48��/cF �< Gohe� t = 2x .G?Ix7��$ xG0 = GbZ �rky 1 �/E /b 00 �AI. TAnI� 51ZE �'F'� 'R7 D��i �lE��gklD� -�'U ��5'I� ��iNDI.� I�r ir1Te+J5i�Yy. I '�N�h W�u. -�Brr J��:nd� �w� ��^1 �+n�� T�a�c �yy i KL/y�h7��19�rJ/a :oc��j a ' Z� µ91 6� C� , 00¢ ; Q = O.�(, oK � ' ��DwiN3Z =-�� z' @ .aDq� _ ,05 ��rawt = ✓��3'S ,a �g��➢ �o ' Z-f"kr1C � 5� I o o�r( UwIFt 33 �p' �^ .00� _ �Q5 � 7= G�oo t �vn N 33 " 5,D�j g"�p-ro % � ��0 ' 1 Venaae Haogen Hruatlln,Inc. � PrintM on Rerycled Papzr � ' I , 1 ' , ' ' ' ' t ' ' , ' , ' , ' ' COMPENSATORY STORAGE CALCULATIONS ' ' v\w�p3834�various4ocfly.doc i ' EASTERN LAND SURYEY ASSOCIATES, INC. 'oB a�zoPosso s-toP fl Si-FOF F81�� II , Chrlstopher R. Mello PLS sr+eerr+o. � oF 1 104�Lowell Street CNLCUUTEDBV ,�T�'� PEABODY, MA 01960 oare 3-7b-93 ' (508) 531-8121 CHECKEDBV �dryti�_ DATE �� SCALE IG6Y1$ED ti- zd-�1S ' SU_'m�'+'1ii2�( - E�oSZ�n1C� c.O�JO1��O�JS .:, . . ' ..__. ELEVR'�10�� STo2cgE..... VoL�Yrv1B CS..F� .... J . ' _�J�}Ee��' � a . '. �-a .__. £s..�.� ,`1- ,o. . .. _ to__.- �I tt -�Z ' . 1 . 89� ............. 3�"j1 . 8�11e�1_ 32i�1 C.6.,3`�`�.$ _........ � 2. . .. - �- Cnl.olo ...'3t�7$l/_.. , 4�l_�Sllo -.... - 4.- _3 _ ,.- �- ..........._ . -.....� - 980.... )9�'1.5 . ;.. � - _ ' , . _ �o-tAtS 9a� ...... �'i�3'l 41 030_ 9bo94•5 Cos'34q.5 ..... t _... _ . _ _. ;...... .__ . .... _.. i. . _SOMMA2� -.._. �}2A4o�Efl ,. Go�JD1-f�0^l5 ' SHEE't:. N�• ... ;. EtEYAZ�ow1 _. � S�ott.4G.E voLymE Lc �� _ ' ' � 6 �-'i 9. �Q ...... �o...-�� , +1 - �Z��4j , . __ ' " ' __ Z9[,3 �1803 �i_�342 »co,358 _ �4- ,... . 5 _ 4988•S _ 24,5 . ,6oa.;S . 35 oa 9 - c - , . _ _ , co 'i ,__ -14s'15........... c . � _.__ z)b'1• 5 '. - o - ' _ . ' ' , , _. .. ' �-o-f�LS -._ �110 ............ za,vSSS '.. �vt�2?.g ?.o � �,5 1�co,358 ._._ __ � _.. cwlsave� ...... ._. , ..... . .. _ .. �x� coNr��iwJS +�iF�S'j .� . -�2S Sto�.S.... +Slo3Z•5 +S'i'-12:... � .4..Ci, o.S ' , '.... _ . _ t _ _ _ ' ' __ ...,.._....__._.._.._._..,-� �.._............._. ----......_�.... ' Compensatory Storage Calculations , ' 1 i ' � TABLE 1 �'{�yo�ti➢ COMPENSATORY STORAGE CALCULATIONS SUPER STOP &SHOP-PEABODY/SALEM � FRONT AREA ' ELEVATION (FT) AREA(FT^2) AVERAGE (FT^2) INCREMENT (FT) VOLUME (FT^3) 9.8 0 I ' 10.0 8496 ' 70.0 8060 10.0 3558 10057 0.2 2011 , ' 10A (TOTAL) 20114 50128 0.5 25064 10.5 80142 I , 92040 0.5 46020 11.0 103937 113156 0.5 56578 ' ' 11.5 122376 132035 0.5 66018 12.0 141694 ' TOTALVOLUME FOR FRONT 795691 CUBIC FT , ' ' 1 1 ' ' Compensatory Storage Calculations ' 1 ' ' ' TABLE 2 �PRW�� COMPENSATORY STORAGE CALCULATIONS SUPER STOP &SHOP- PEABODY/SALEM BACK AREA I, ' ' ELEVATION (FT) AREA(FT^2) AVERAGE (FT^2) INCREMENT(FT) VOLUME (FT^3) 7.0 2182 ' 3490 1.0 3490 8.0 4798 8562 0.8 6849 8.8 12325 ' 8.33 0 11718 0.47 5507 ' 8.8 23436 8.8 (TOTAL) 35761 36952 0.2 7390 ' 9.0 38142 43072 1.0 43072 10.0 48001 t 50159 1.0 50159 11.0 52316 53928 1.0 53928 , 12.0 55540 TOTALVOLUME FOR FRONT 170395 ' CUBIC FT ' , ' 2 t 1 Compensatory Storage Calculations , 1 � ' I , TABLE 3 ' ' TOTALS BY ELEVATION OF COMPENSATORY STORAGE SUPER STOP&SHOP- PEABODY/SALEM � ELEVATION/STORAGE VOLUME Ff^3 ' SECTION 7 FT- 8 FT 8 FT-9 FT 9 FT- 10 FT 10 FT- 11 FT 11 FT- 12 FT FRONT 0 0 2011 71084 122596 , BACK 3490 19746 43072 50159 53928 ' TOTAL 3490 19746 45083 121243 176524 ' EXIST. COND. 889 9137 41030 96094 68348 � , CHANGE FRM. EXIST. COND. +2601 +10609 +4053 +25149 +108176 ' , ' ' , 3 � , � ' ' , 1 ' 1 � ' ' ' ! 1 1 1 ' SITE HYDROGRAPHS - EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 � v\w�D3834�variousVocFly.doc , eoe S�oP �¢p�/-�Lcrc2c 'F 4r 13�A EASTERN LAND SURYEY ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Christopher R. Mello PLS s"EET"o. ' oF � 304 Lowell $treet cn�cuuTeo ev �1,c-n pA� G-g 5 PEABODY, MA 01960 �- (508) 531-8121 CHECKEDBY «�� pp7E �� ' , .. ,_ . ., SCALE .... '�. , ��. �, �. . ' ' SZUwJOFF c�RvE Nwr0�2- '7E�e4rni�J�L'1�oti13 � ...,. _..... ' 4as�.rmE :��jDe ^•. cc�e Sa �� Gcuy�a C �or� `�o.��,a�.� �... - c�` �v�.A-�ivv-s ' _ , .__ . : 1�2Ecow+ S -r�iuC��o�J '2C�.1 C��c ��-tlou , �. CcrlE2, .--(vpE ...... . Gt�l �. . {�2�A _ .� C.� `� -A�2�4 . ' ....... ... ....... .. _ . _. � ! - lm�e�v�o�� . Z �i�. zs4•2 eG��iEL....'-�AScI� _. 2,'� ...... 2 '1 Ac.,. 2 34�9 ... ' �oc�oso ..._(PaoR .'� C> n� _... i z i�c.' �az. t.� ; . . �J' MSSEt2 ';:...... '. Glo......_ ' o.�1 /�c. . !..... Cc9 Co(i . , _.. ' .... .... ...._. .__ i_ . ........ ... �. . , _... . ..... . ..... ...... _ . ��tsa ... , `l (o� :. G61,18 ' .. C.oyv�POSi�E c� _ ,c��. 38-/..� c�i ......= e9�..sa , So� qo . 1 . . . . � - _. �O$7CO.JST2UG-f10.J . 2Cl� C ��-CtJl-�=�110t� ' � Ccv�¢, .�YP� c�y -�aEc c.�l. �c Ae,c� ' 1*.r+P�av�ovS �i� . 5..� SSS.(o ! -- . L,OtilDSc.r�Q60 �....... ,..�4 . . �I , I Z �2 8 '�; - . .... . .... .. .... . . _. I ' , �Na�vM�.. �R�s, '.'13 , •�l�t . 5.��7: e I, � Tov��.q _`��Co� G9q �1� _ . ;. ' Carn�o.5,�� C� �°�q �15 f '1 ,L ) .... _ °11,8'1 � 'S_c� `�12... , _... , wmcrax,rsm.s.a�an.i�cawiO.M..sm�wss.mni.mumvwi¢mum¢imasmm .., , . ..�. ' ' r 11B ' Proiect Pro�ect# �38�y4 LocaGon EN LEN1 Sheet—of_ Calculated by Date � ' �7•�'1Ei ' Checked by Date Title ' ' EX�i�NCn CDND�i�ONS IC ' �. I SD Ff Fc�ESr " (� �.S�9'o = 6.3 fP� = 8.3 w�� ' 3� fT�VY►tN I!u�f� c. b. Sa�o = 0,3SFP� - �6.� W��n� s I ' , jpTr�� T� = 2S w��Ns, �I ' 2Srn�Ns /(�mir�/►ic� � � �_I H2S � �x�s�nn�; ic - o•4 � � � � 1 � � V8p8S52 Han�wp BN81IIq ILG � pMted on ftecyded Paper � I _ .�- • • • • � I � �� M� ��-�-�� I w�� I 1 �_��I %' w� �� i�� si��i �� r�� • �� '�� r�� i�� • e ��° . a�� • � • �� ' I� I��C � ��e � �� Y/ �I�� I�� r w �w • �� i� • �� 1�M . I � �_�- �� /M / • I 1�� • � � � • � i i i � �� i �� 1 I � N�� • � � M�� • � � . __ ��_ � � � �� _ _ ____I_ � �� r �� MI�� A � • N�� N�'��'��-I ��N�� I��11��-� I�� II��I��- .� �� %I�N� I�� i��I��—� N ��e. .� ��I i1 w�� IN �� ..��s� ��N'�� so��r�� . i;SI�N.��— �5��- �w�� w� �a� � •. • • �• • -� • 1 . � • • � • • • � s � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � _ __.. ._ . _ ._.... . .. ...._. * . * TA 20 S/N . • * * HMVersion . 3.40 * * TR 20 * Oate . 1/16/96 * * * 1'ime : 15:13:45 * * Projec[ Formulation Hydrology • Znput file : C:\HJT\3834EX.T20 * � � Output file : C:\HJS�3834EX.OUT " ..............+..:.........+.ww+w.++.+..:.....:.....:....::.::::........::::...: x�cx�cxxx xxxxxx xxx�cx xxxxx x x x x x x xx x x x x x x x x xxxx�cx x x x x x x x x x x x � x x x x �oc x . x x x xxxxxxx �acxxx . . . Full Microcomputet Implementation .. . .. . bY . . . Haestad Methods, Inc. . . . ' . 37 Hrookside Road * Waterbury, Connecticut 06708 * (203) 755-1666 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ..xrt«.x++.:.+.x+:+g0-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOA TR-20 HYDROLOGY••*"x'•"""•"` JOB TR-20 111 TITLE STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS PAEPARED SY: VHB 5 RAINFL 7 0.1 8 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 6 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 B 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 8 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.019 0.019 8 0.020 0.021 0.022 0.023 0.029 8 0.026 0.027 0.028 0.029 0.030 8 0.031 0.032 0.034 0.035 0.036 8 0.037 0.038 0.040 0.091 0.042 8 0.043 0.095 0.046 0.097 0.049 8 0.050 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.055 8 0.057 0.058 0.060 0.061 0.063 8 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.069 0.070 B 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.077 0.079 � 8 0.080 0.082 0.089 0.085 0.087 8 0.089 0.091 0.093 0.095 0.097 � I 8 0.100 0.103 0.106 0.109 D.112 8 0.115 0.118 0.121 0.124 0.127 8 0.130 0.139 0.137 0.140 0.144 8 0.148 0.151 0.155 0.159 0.163 � 8 0.167 0.171 0.176 0.180 0.185 � 8 0.189 0.194 0.199 0.205 0.210 8 0.216 - 0.222 0.228 0.235 0.292 � 8 0.250 0.258 0.266 0.276 0.287 8 0.298 0.312 0.328 0.363 0.916 8 0.500 0.589 0.638 0.673 0.689 8 0.702 0.719 0.725 0.734 0.743 8 0.751 0.758 0.766 0.772 0.779 - 8 0.785 0.790 0.796 0.801 0.806 8 0.811 0.816 0.821 0.825 0.829 8 0.834 0.838 0.892 0.845 0.899 8 0.853 0.857 0.860 0.864 0.867 B 0.870 0.874 0.877 0.880 0.883 � 8 0.886 0.899 0.892 0.895 0.898 . B 0.900 0.903 0.906 0.906 0.910 ' 8 0.911 0.913 0.915 0.917 0.919 �'�, B 0.920 0.922 0.924 0.925 0.927 � 8 � 0.929 0.930 0.932 0.933 0.935 � B 0.936 0.938 0.939 0.941 0.992 � 8 0.944 0.995 0.946 0.948 0.999 I 8 0.951 0.952 0.953 0.955 0.956 8 0.957 0.958 0.960 0.961 0.962 8 0.963 0.965 0.966 0.967 0.966 � � i � � � � � � � � � � r � � � � ! +*.ww.w..+«�...::. ,:xg0-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA (CONTIN[SED)"'�'•�'••"":Rw:Rxxx 8 0.969 0.971 0.972 0.973 0.974 B 0.975 0.976 0.977 0.978 0.979 8 0.981 0.982 0.983 0.984 0.985 8 0.986 0.987 0.988 0.989 0.990 8 0.991 0.992 0.993 0.999 0.995 8 0.996 0.997 0.998 0.999 1.000 e i.00a i.000 i.oao i.000 i.000 9 ENDTBL G 6 RUNOFF 1 001 1 0.0119 � 90� 0.41 1 1 1 TOTAL ENDATA � �W I � � 7 INCREM 6 0.10 7 COMPUT 7 001 001 0.0 4.7 1.07 2 O1 10 10-YEAR ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 001 001 0.0 5.9 1.07 2 O1 25 25-YEAA � ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 001 001 0.0 6.8 1.07 2 O1 99 100-YEAR ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 «..+...r:�.*..+...wwa�....:..::.END OF 80-80 LIST::...:..:w..w+++..rr:.««.x....... � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 EXISTING CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 1 COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PROJECT FORMULATION - HYDAOLOGY USER NOTES THE USERS MANUAL FOA THIS PROGRAM IS THE MAY 1982 ORAFT OF TR-20. CHANGES FROM THE 2/14/74 VERSION INCLODE: REACH ROOTING - THE MO�IFIED ATT-KIN ROUTING PAOCEDURE REPLACES THE CONVEX METHOD. INPUT DATA PREPARED FOR PREVIOUS PROGRAM VERSIDNS USING CONVEX ROUTING COEFFICIENTS WILL NOT RUN ON THZS VERSION. THE PREFERRED TYPE OF DATA ENTRY IS CROSS SECTION DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF A REACH. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE OPTIONAL CRO$$ SECTION DISCHAAGE-AREA PLOTS BE OBTAIN£D WHENEVEft NEW CROSS SECTION DATA IS ENTERED. ' THE PLOTS SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR REASONABLENESS AND ADEQUACY OF INPUT DATA FOR THE COMPUTATION OF "M" VALUES USED IN THE ROUTING PROCEDURE. GOIDELINE$ FOR DETERMINING OR ANALYZING AEACH LENGTHS AND COEFFICIENTS (X,M) ARE AVAILAHLE IN THE USERS MANUAL. SUMMARY TASLE 2 DISPLAYS REACH ROOTING RESVLTS AND ROUTING PARAMETERS FOR COMPARISON AND CHECKING. HYDROGRAPH GENERATION - THE PROCEDURE TO CALCULATE THE INTERNAL TIME INCREMENT AND PEAK TIME OF THE UNIT HYDROGRAPH HAVE HEEN IMPROVED. PEAK DISCHARGES AND TIMES MAY DIFFER FAOM THE PREVIOUS VERSION. OUTPUT HYDROGRAPHS ARE STILL ZNTERPOLATED, PRINTED, AND ROUTEO AT THE USER SELECTED MAIN TIME INCREMENT. INTERMEDIATE PEAKS - METHOD ADDED TO PROVIDE DISCHAAGES AT INTERMEDIATE POINTS WITHIN REACHES WITHOUT ROUTING. j OTHER - THIS VERSION CONTAINS SOME ADDITIONS TO THE INPUT AND NUMEAOUS MODIFICATIONS TO THE OUTPUT. USER OPTIONS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED ANO AOGMENTED ON THE JOB RECORD, RAINTABLES ADDED, ERROR AND WARNING MESSAGES EXPANDED, AND THE S[IMMARY TABLES COMPLETELY REVISE�. THE HOLOOUT OPTION IS NOT OPERATIONAL AT THIS TIME. PROGRAM QUESTIONS OR PROHLEMS SHOOLD BE DIRECTED TO HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS AT THE SCS NATZONAL TECFP7ICAL CENTERS: CHESTER, PA (NORTHEAST) -- 215-499-3933, FORT WORTH, TX (SOUTH) -- 334-5242 (FTS) � LINCOLN, NB (MIDWEST) -- 541-5318 (FTS) , PORTLAND, OR (WEST) -- 923-4099 (FTS) OA HYDROLOGY ONIT, ENGINEEAING DNISION, LANHAM, MD -- 436-7383 (FT$). PROGRAM CHANGES SINCE MAY 1982: � 12/17/82 - CORRECT PEAK RATE FACTOR FOR OSER ENTERED DIP4IYD CORRECT REACH AOOTING PEAK TRAVEL TIME PRINTED WITH FOLLPRINT OPTION 5/02/83 - CORRECT COMPOTATIONS FOR --- . 1. DIVISION OF BASEFLOW IN DIVERT OPERATION 2. HYDAOGRAPH VOLUME SPLIT BETWEEN BASEFLOW AND ASOVE BASEFLOW 3. CROSS SECTION DATA PLOTTING POSITION 4. INTERMEDIATE PEAK WHEN "FROM° AREA IS LARGER THAN "THRU" AREA 5. STORAGE ROOTE� REACH TRAVEL TIME FOR MULTIPEAK HYDROGRAPH � 6. ORDERING "FLOW-FREQ" FILE FROM SUMMARY TABLE $3 DATA , 7. HASEFLOW ENTERED WITH READHYD 8. LOW FLOW SPLIT DURING DIVERT PROCEDURE #2 WF[EN SECTION RATINGS START AT DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS ENHANCEMENTS --- 1. REPLACE USEA MANOAL ERROR CODES (PAC>E 4-9 TO 9-11) WITH MESSAGES 2. LAHEL OUTPOT HYDAOGRAPH FILES WITH CROSS SECTION/STROCTURE, ALTERNATE AND STORM NO'S 09/O1/83 - CORRECT INPUT PND OUTPUT ERRORS FOR INTERMEDIATE PEAKS CORRECT COMBINATION OF RATING TABLES FOR �NERT CHECK REACH ROUTING PARAMETERS FOR ACCEPTABLE LIMITS ' ELIMINATE MINIMOM REACH TRAVEL TIME WfiEN ATT-KIN COEFFICIENT EQOALS ONE � � � � � � � i � � � � � i � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEAHODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 1 AEV 09/O1/83 EXISTING CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHH ' PAGE 2 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FAOM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 1 RECORD ID 10-YEAR STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTR = 4.70 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=10 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION R[1NOFF CROSS SECTION 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET� � 12.28 19.99 (RUNOFF) i TIME(HAS) FIAST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 ROORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS ORAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 9.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .02 5.00 DZSCHG .02 .03 .03 .04 .OS .OS .06 .06 .07 .07 6.00 DISCHG .08 .09 .10 .11 . .11 .12 .12 .13 .19 .14 7.00 DISCHG .15 .16 .18 .19 .20 .22 .25 .29 .33 .36 8.00 DISCHG .38 .39 .91 .92 .49 .95 .49 .51 .53 .59 - 9.00 DISCHG .58 .62 .64 .66 .69 .73 .76 .79 .84 .89 10.00 DISCHG .92 .94 .98 1.09 1.13 1.19 1.25 1.32 1.39 1.99 11.00 DISCHG 1.60 1.74 1.86 1.99 2.19 2.99 � 2.73 3.12 3.92 5.81 12.00 DISCHG 9.33 14.92 18.78 19.95 1'7.77 13.88 10.16 7.97 5.80 4.71 13.00 DISCHG 3.97 3.99 3.06 2.79 2.58 2.42 2.28 2.13 2.01 1.92 14.00 DISCHG 1.84 1.78 1.74 1.70 1.62 1.55 1.52 1.50 1.94 1.35 15.00 DISCHG 1.30 1.31 1.32 1.28 1.25 1.20 1.17 1.16 1.15 1.12 16.00 DISCHG 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.09 1.03 1.01 .96 .94 .94 .90 17.00 DISCHG .81 .69 .64 .69 .66 . .65 .61 .59 .59 .58 18.00 DISCHG .57 .58 .57 .55 .53 .53 .52 .52 .52 .52 19.00 DISCHG .52 .52 .50 .47 .47 .49 .50 .49 .47 .47 20.00 DISCHG .47 .93 .41 .94 .45 .43 .41 .49 .45 .43 21.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .93 .95 .42 ' .39 .37 .36 .35 .35 22.00 DISCHG .37 .42 .94 .42 .39 .37 .36 .35 .35 .35 23.00 DISCHG .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 24.00 DISCHG .33 .25 .16 .09 .OS .03 .O1 .O1 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 3.58 WATERSHED INCHES, 27.52 CFS-HRS, 2.27 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPOTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PA55 1 AECORD IO EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPOT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 1 AECORD ID 25-YEAR STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 5.40 RAIN OORATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=25 MAIN TIME INCREMENT - .10 HOURS r � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 i � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 2 AEV 09/O1/83 EXISTING CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 3 OPERATION RUNOFF CRO55 SECTION 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.28 23.55 (RONOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOUAS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOOAS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 9.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .03 .09 .04 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .OS .06 .07 .OB .09 .10 .10 .11 .12 .12 6.00 DISCHG .13 .14 .16 .16 .17 .18 .19 .19 .20 .21 7.00 DISCHG .21 .23 .26 .27 .29 .31 .35 .40 .45 .48 8.00 DISCHG .51 .53 .55 .57 .58 .60 .62 .69 .69 .71 9.00 DISCHG .75 .80 .82 .85 .89 .93 .97 1.00 1.07 1.12 10.00 DISCHG 1.16 1.18 1.23 1.30 1.90 1.47 1.55 1.63 1.72 1.83 11.00 DISCHG . 1.97 2.13 � 2.28 2.93 2.66 2.96 3.31 3 J7 9.72 6.97 �. 12.00 DISCHG 11.13 17.11 22.19 23.50 20.87 16.28 11.90 8 JS 6.77 5.50 ! 13.00 DISCHG 4.63 9.01 3.56 3.25 3.00 2.82 2.65 2.47 2.34 2.24 14.00 DISCHG 2.14 2.07 2.03 1.98 1.89 1.80 1.77 1.75 1.68 1.57 15.00 DISCHG 1.51 1.52 1.53 1.49 1.45 � 1.40 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.30 16.00 DISCHG 1.25 1.23 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.12 1.09 1.09 1.04 17.00 DISCHG .93 .80 .74 J9 J6 .76 .71 .68 .69 .67 18.00 DISCHG .66 .68 .66 .69 .62 .61 .60 .60 .60 .60 19.00 DISCHG .60 .60 .57 .54 .55 .5� .58 .57 .54 .55 20.00 DISCHG .54 .50 .98 .51 .52 .50 .98 .51 .52 .49 21.00 DISCHG .45 .45 .50 .52 ' .49 .45 .43 .42 .41 .91 22.00 DISCHG .43 .48 .51 .99 .45 .43 .41 .91 .41 .90 23.00 DISCHG .40 .40 .40 .90 .90 .40 .40 .90 .40 .90 24.00 DISCHG .36 .29 .19 .10 .OS .03 .02 .O1 .00 AUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.26 WATERSHED INCHES, 32.70 CFS-HRS, 2.70 ACAE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENOCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS '2 AECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATZON COMPOT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 1 RECOAD ID 100-YEAR STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 6.80 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STOAM N0.=99 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS � OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAI( DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.28 30.63 (RONOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME ZNCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. � � � � r � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PA55 3 - REV 09/O1/83 EXISTING CONDITIONS PAEPARED BY: VHB PAGE 9 3.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .02 .03 .04 4.00 DISCHG .OS .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 .11 .13 .13 5.00 DISCHG .19 .15 .17 .18 .19 .20 .21 .22 .23 .24 ' 6.00 DISCHG .25 .27 .29 .30 .31 .33 .33 .33 .35 .35 7.00 DISCHG .36 .39 .92 .95 .97 .50 .56 .64 .72 .76 8.00 DISCHG .BO .82 .85 .87 .88 .90 .99 1.00 1.09 1.05 9.00 �ISCHG 1.10 1.17 1.21 1.23 1.29 1.35 1.39 1.94 1.52 1.59 10.00 DISCHG 1.64 1.68 1.73 1.83 1.96 2.06 2.16 2.26 2.38 2.52 11.00 DISCHG 2 J1 2.92 3.11 3.31 3.61 9.02 9.96 5.07 6.33 9.27 - 12.00 DISCHG 19.72 22.97 28.97 30.54 27.05 21.05 15.36 11.27 8.72 7.06 13.00 DISCHG 5.99 5.15 4.56 9.16 3.85 3.61 3.39 3.1� 2.99 2.86 � 19.00 DISCHG 2.79 2.69 2.59 2.53 2.91 2.30 2.26 2.23 2.14 2.01 15.00 DISCHG 1.93 1.94 1.95 1.90 1.85 1.78 1.73 1.72 1.71 1.66 16.00 DISCHG 1.60 1.56 1.55 1.59 1.53 1.50 1.42 1.39 1.39 1.33 17.00 DISCHG 1.19 1.03 .94 .99 .97 .96 .90 .87 .88 .85 16.00 DISCHG .85 .86 .84 .81 .76 .78 .77 .77 .76 .77 19.00 DISCHG .76 .77 .73 .69 .90 .72 .74 .72 .69 .70 20.00 DISCHG .69 .69 .61 .65 .67 .63 .61 .65 .67 .63 21.00 DISCHG .58 .58 .63 .66 .62 .57 .59 .53 .52 .52 , 22.00 DISCHG .54 .61 .65 .62 .57 .54 .53 .52 .52 .51 . I 23.00 DISCHG .51 .51 .51 _ .51 .51 .51 .51 .51 .51 .51 � 29.00 DISCHG .48 .38 .24 .13 .07 .04 .02 .O1 .O1 .00 AUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 5.62 WATERSHED INCHES, 43.16 CFS-HRS, 3.57 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPOTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTAOL OPERATION ENDJOB RECOAO IO � � � � � � � a� � _ � � r � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM SOB 1 SUMMARY REV 09/O1/93 EXISTING CON�ITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 5 SUMMAAY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTSONS IN THE ORDER PERFOAMED (A STAR(') AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYOROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGAAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARO RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAR DISCHARGE STROCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TAHLE MOIST TIME ----------------------- RUNOFF ------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOONT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 10 XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 3.58 --- 12.28 19.99 1679.9 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 25 XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 4.26 --- 12.28 23.55 1979.2 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 99 XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 5.62 -- 12.28 30.63 2574.3 � � � � � � � � � � � � � r � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 SOPP7ARY REV 09/O1/83 EXISTING CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 6 SUMMARY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CFS) AT XSECTIONS AND STRUCTURES FOR ALL STORMS AND ALTERNATES XSECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS. . . . . . .... ID (SQ MI) 10 25 99 XSECTION 1 .O1 ALTERNATE 1 � 19.99 23.55 - 30.63 � ' ' 1 � � ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 � 1 ' SITE HYDROGRAPHS - PROPOSED CONDITIONS ' ' v\w�A3834�variousVocfly.doc ' ' r1 � 1 ) ' Pro�e�c Pro�ecc� J5551 L.ocation Sheet—of— � Calculated by Date Checked by Date , � Title GN�W1kT�L � �b�D t ' � L'S � ' } � F pL � 2 � � ? � ��. � � , � � � i , � , � � �, 1 � ,► J � � � Z , � � �- `� 1� s s ' � � � I �'i , � . � 2 z � ' � �� - ' �� 1 Venvsse Hangen Bruatlln,Inc. � P�;.�rea o�2e�yd:a Paper ' ' ', , r I1D ' Pro)ect Project#_3S3Q' Locadon � k Sheet_of Calculated by � Date �/9� , Checked by Date Tide , l-�'D�ZblaRAf N�j ' �Ko,Jr nr��C�r16, �or ' 'rorn� ��q = 3.3 � ��i�o�5 A�� = zz7o5� + 5�i�'� f 30o t /b(zao� + lg(Go� t!'�= ZG98s , /�DTL ; �vi� ✓�✓E 4F L �ad,� �yLy ' � y � r� ) GursS,r,�s .�,�� ' f�s ll�zBM� {�yDR��G r�-riw la�o�p G l�r�� B� A<y5u�se� ��; Te-5� _��S = z(�985/435Go r ,GZ/4c X �� (�1 �nt�-bcop)= �(5.B4� ' �w��o� z.(�8�� x 98 aGZ.G4 � ��932/3 3 ' �w�E DF Co�IC6�iRA71o/� ' � �A�rr;p A��P 'I� CPTCrt �3P�N »Ot-r@ 1.2`�� --7 yr_-,.oucr ' Z4 �vs ; j�w,c - �Os�_c ' ' ��Z✓�n�w ' ° T�A�/F, L TVY1E IlJ ��QF.� o 4� L� �o"� a,�/� _> 2S -rPs � p.� ,�� /b0 L F l�N (� D,,S�o � 3.2 FPS = b .S' m�N 80 �F 1��9 OS% 7 �. Z�P.S = D.3m�t� , 3�� L F z 9'�� C>.�% =� q 6 f P$ : ( ,� �� ' Tor►��. z,S��N �ti Qv�S Va¢aae Heugen Brustlln,Inc. � P,o,�.a o�aKy�iea ea�� ' 1 ' r�1D ' rro�ecc rro�ec�n I Location Sheet_of— Calculated by Date , Checked by Date Title ' I�I' ' ��1�5� �G = � �2 V�lti1S t 2. S Yvl It� � � �,7�I�5 I�' ' ' i� ls Cr�sS rHH�I s w��NS, �sE T� = oo) F1�s , ' i ' ' ' , � ' ' � Vanaae Hangeu Bmatlla Inc. � p,;,,�ea o�rse�ydea eap:r ' ' ' �� ' Project � � Project# 3C�3`�" Location Sheet of_ Calculated by � Date� ' Checked by Date Title ' ��i�b�/��r , ua�3o y� - �,a�� cr�=9P '� -D.� ' , ' , ' ' ' , ' , � t Venasse Hengea Bmstlln,Inc. � pM�¢d on Reaycled Paper ' ' , r� l � ) ' Project ,Gi45 Project# 3$3� Locadon��a� �1/hE� Sheet—of— Calculated by Date � 13�9G , Checked by � � Date �� 17��,( Title ' 12�tP hrt'� �I �� L��EK T-rAt- , 7Gl - 3,3 - �.'14 =Z$7A� ' G�l ��dioJS �,7hc. - J,��- Z,lt� = 1,58 x �18 — l5�•g'� , Lkrl�Sch�D I. IZ - a,Gz = 0.5n X 7g i 3700 l�ar��ac o�7�/ x �3 - 57_,G � ' zq9,51�Z,S� = 8' C N = 87 -r� (s�� .�s �.�� — ' SQ s�T 5=0. I , v 33o C�N��EI S=,DOs(- I I z 1 � ` �r �1 = 7x ,5; 3. 5 - � ; �P = 8 r � � � � � V0�8SSC$gpg¢p BNSf1�0.IOC. � Prinled on Recyded Paper ' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � a � � � � Quick TR-55 Ver.5.46 5/N:1803000002 Executed: 18:27:07 01-13-1996 C:\BJT\REAR.TCT STOP & SHOP � PEAHODY $ALEM Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: REAR � - SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc orily) Segment ID A Surface descrip[ion PAVED Manning's roughness coeff., n 0.0100 Flow length, L (total < or = 300) ft 50.0 Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.200 , Land slope, s ft/ft 0.0100 0.8 .007 * (nRL) _ � � T = --- hrs 0.01 = 0.01 �. 0.5 0.9 P2 ' s j SHAI,LOW CONCENTRATED FLOW � ' I Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved)? Flow leng[h, L ft 0.0 Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.0000 o.s Avg.V = Csf � (s) ft/S 0.0000 where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345 Paved Csf = 20.3282 T = L / (3600•V) hrs 0.00 = 0.00 CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID B Cross Sec[ional Flow Area, a sq.ft 3.50 Wetted pezimeter, Pw ft 8.00 Hydraulic zadius, r = a/Pw ft 0.436 Channel slope, s ft/ft 0.0090 Manning's roughness coeff., n 0.20�0 2/3 1/2 1.49 • r * s V = - ft/s 0.2715 n Flow length, L ft 330 T = L / (3600*V) hrs 0.34 = 0.39 � . . . . . . . . .. . . .... .. . . . .. . . . . .. . ... . . .. ... .. . ... . . . . . . ... . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. � . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . ... . . .. . .. .. . ... . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. TOTAL TIME (hi5) 0.35 ' `� �' � Ri"/� � e� ' � y 4r"` }� ye�.. "o*..- :.. . „t,� M1...�• .-:aR fY �� r/. � -. �w�p� .Y� +$�p. i �, ._. <! .�� - i �1! l �.�a ��y� ; , ` �Iw •. vuC Y J ' / r .. �X' Y9 �� '"`�' �i/r � . � •� r .. g . `�rc ✓.,.. n � �� . '_•,y ' �L""" � � :a �f , �`'� � '� � i r,^ffi'� if �I �; �MnB , i,:}��.� � .�r� ' �s�" � ` �. t y.; t , F.a.n +�a � P.��" �.g �r�o' a r • I ��,8 s�n � i � � - . , � � .. ,� . � . / �p€ ' p '� '�� . � ♦7'� _ _, P+"a9.�i�, p ~ a e> ��. ��.r r :ai�k�i t�- , .� T{ I k ' ` ' $e � Pa8 a C:. " ? ��.ny .3 �"�::.\ r ..,]1Mm 4 8�;. �, ..4�. � � . �1 w: � . r�'^ h� �.)p+ti�`!!' � __ \ T! >e , BuBI� � �.�Wr , __ r ` � wF� � � '��` .��`r � ` � i :�' , .., = ^. :'�'� r ��y • ,� . SE ♦ � rr� E' � �' .'�"��' � � BUB {� % r ' < PaC f 5a �.�.. (. .`( „r, �� 4�.` �' :..-a�, S .k..�Kn'r...�'��.yw ..��a .r- A � �\ `.. �' PaB :`PaD � J:. i � . . � � R ^� ;�'N \ UD . PaB � ^ a,� �n �*.' r,d°t �' \ -t� � � llr � 4.. . , �,�a•,,� .„ v- X va� ''$ �� +,. .�3. ,i�a`1f'�,`+��.r .,�u� � :` qs.� .-� � - ' 'r : � '�s'''", veB : �.'.. � i i n r ^. 1 . � .. .Y n ' PaD ��aB �� f�� . y .�.a'C � Bu8 � , �� CrC � 'H'. .. � . . CD' t� � �1 ' � � ' rw �' lS�'�9+ ♦ ' { I < �� . Qu � MmC . � BU TO / t�'_fi�`' i' T. .a * �"'il"i.%� r � ' B . cicre 3 Hu'iY .I� p MsB T��r��. I R�:� '1 .::�`' p ^,� �. � ,..'=uD� ;r� . :"^ '�. �1 -� 'S d :` I �:�"r::�F ..... � � �K ,.. >..� 5 � r ✓ �"'"�rh �.6 sre �•;��, i 1�'�� V ;. .:•,�,� �. 2 c. y't.t. ' �. rY. � 4�' iv '�...��►�.'�. �F� i.. ' e.k:,,�� • �i.L��~� ��^A��;. r��i� r\� ' b �..: L.�� ♦ i �'N�e. Y� �� 'i aw MS�� -r.�r�-sr��' ♦ � \� ' �i �rr r;.'�'��J��4}}'. '�._au: we�q.. �ro-„+N'M�S � ' r4 �� r.�?S'�'q,� .�b X` �'! � J ) `S�,P"r..��t ��.�b „ti t �.R.y y,�"'„ 3 iS n.+ � ^�. t+ Sa v . � '�17An7,�, y�' �� `i. . /y�p^� ,`� / N I�":.✓`. � { ... •.{� �Fc �{. � e! �+..� ty+� c ,J 1 � v .� i � 'y� }'�� s• SI -a�� .i��"" 'N'.. '�'�3;� � � �+,L / �'`1t. ' '� il��.�.`+rt �y:� yY'.P� E�;BODY � rr� ry r� . r� tv" �, �c� ?, ��^'�� i �.. '�e':'3'- 9 t,.-� , ��^ '��t ' .�_ ( '1. � 4TA��r`�� @ �' ,�� h'�� J�wF�.:.��,y` i ¢`� N,`y.{�-{�� ...\�I. '.�-fx }i � yF J. Y `�c `� " / 'CrC � �i .f-*1�'^9``�"r`_�� p?� �' ��! b �;�� r� YW��;� !^ {•-�- t"� T�rM"�� we /VA I �� `C',��,ti� r� �'i . j n. ,�� t +" � � `� K�"�p� - �d�6 ,�. '�a��' �4'� \ �, r�5��'�'� 'kefi.r�4 d4'.�s ' w i uo � uo . �� ,;° v :�� .� �r,»�` `�2�. ,� �. .�a � i - J . �... �.� ;� `.� . � � � :+'� :t .F�C:. ,��^rr ;, �, . ��;: � . , , � . , .�<' S .# cn� �� y. .y J � , � )" � � �� F ^ �"� ''�'". �,,P. � � .�s�.� . a ._ ; �� uo n'�'��- u�� c . EDGEv ��,`••-� ' ,a.. _ 1iILL �� ` r�. �j F' �� tr : . • ��f , ,,r'� �iu/y -a � i } .� � :CrD Y"'�, a `�" �.� ♦ 6A. \' (} FW t�.: +d�.p� F�.' r g � �, u Fq � "� ' `-t� ' .. taf � � � �. ��•� � ."'.. #-,+,* t � .t t f r. ,v s, -. { • �„ . t�"+� M'' - y 1��.�� 6 p '�� '. �w . 4� �� • ' }/� � ! 4" Cj y � }��N �+� � �. �" U��9R�yr�� 11q� 7 -..��)�� T � "`�1?'�. �� O I . -�! yL � N V{ ♦ / R... 1 ► �6� , ta�' �Sf i' 4 ,�SG" ' o � �:+. � ,e ' ��ao �� i ,. x �,* �.+C MmA . ��.Y �'�' , '�w-E�k� ��,5�F � w � :-at �f.��i `' w� �+, s�� 6 v `� . � ,s.-M'� ' r :ir . 1 . � yy'4 t �' i Y '�+i .. ,r �FO .�.%'fi � '� �y�Qy �y:�y 3�-�it� � � .� � � .� WiuC � Ur".�� • �� ,��.� ' � , �� .,,[tAf.fig p. 1►_,-� ��k��:!i�� i.� i�'�w � � �.: + l •'� ' ��: ` g �'�+�'� ;4 ` "� -. �`�nwK'*� - ,'x ..a+ •4"., � ..�� . ... � � -±E,. �,�`+x�.r� a� • Lc�'y.,�. � y _ ��F.eanF�� ss. � � .. GAt�I�WS' � - ? �rY' ' �" : - ` ' - � ^s ;. t� � ^ ��` HILL"' �' � �'A�� ^. �f: _ . . -' y.. .... _.,., ,. *�, � 'c�c ,,.caQ�"��' � p .T � .�4. f- ..i �' . �6 . : < � i , •.' r =�� ' p;�BOC/,�(: ti�.' �.� s+ �' � '�� -:'a � � ryuC�. ) .'S . �� _ .. y MuG`�. . .... p '� CrD\, a I C 4 ` i y A�. i.. UD ..�+Cc J�' � � 1 ,.. ..�SmNE �a0 UD W '�, ,. m s� '.Nn �,�,�� M6, �fp`�7� � ��ts� '. fv-. ` u s . � : ' ( 4 O _ :n. � .� f f�uC� �7?° n� 7b i.i . ` ' . T a, � �:D L! }� > / � � . :'• � �:,t � fi^` �+ yq �y ' ..; `b � . -�y^� .�pc` '.�.�.rn ' r�'a�l � L `.w t.� ��. �� F�L '!�� . C�$ f � �'r ' m `',„� ��.�'Y$ r ., a!'� 's + '^a& �`e .E a ' �' �'�. �� p ,3�^y�, ,�i,'�J' p CrD r UD so`.5fr ?_� 'IG '_. ♦ `.y .. -,.. � �,y,. '.. . � Y .. f 4 ,� A, �p' . ' Wa � y. 'OA '�k . -�w - f` Ii��" :` �� F � �: ., / ~p,� . A�1 � � � ��{ �. �y,.� *a�. . � . �y.� �' . �;G � . / �# A� �:r.� �._ � �y� v . . tV 5f . , %� UD � �� 9 � I� � � +c ss �[u �"yF�s..�, � �•rd��•:�yJ�.�°.�. �:�'\:��i.z� . .. ��.C..r". � `�`.:x'r4._ i ' �� CrD. � � �/'. �� FXt. ��• r. . � � . � Y ' I iJ.a� . � �� ' / :�a'Cc� '`t• �. ;u ��'1C M1 ��i.�.� • �1�N�� 353� � , � ,� . � �. � � �o ��r� , wi'' trt � � /�D:�� '' � t+i A . �'' C'c _+ �p`� �J'DIL ��'� a �* q"R�. �r. x 1�4�yy� p"`� �F.�! >L / �d0z {'jy F�ac l'ov�IT! i � ..:Y 4 ��1x . �:,'" ,.1 GCi)�„z z r� _ .� , <�-�: ..F� s✓ i � M�� + •'� R. � I� Ur , . / �� - < � �4�qG � ��I� Y .tr..9O �i.r �,�=4 '+x?�m. y (:DK` , t �m � �., w i . n .. ��' , 1 ' �B , Project h'�"S Project# 3�3'� Location Sheet—of— Calculated by Date � ' Checked by �� Da[e � Title � i ' �KoNT ��KI�E� �nIFIV��nl �9T�M A�n�E 5wt�l ��G ��r� � 5o�c� LoErS rr�Drc�-rE ljRAt� +G�itv�L t ��G RnT� �To-� Ve��r�D �io�`t"o STAR-'( 0� CDr15tKUG7)UN ' ��vw� -ir+� 3A�usr,tBc� w1�r+to� 5�� L -'! �, ZI EIkL/L�/�l/r� � .��4/ ��iF/� ' M� �nl�I I,T�TI ar� �p��fE �1" A t�h 5D% E��"�rG = 830 , Doo�}) (��x �2 .1 i.33XZs��cS)� � - 3.1G� CFy � � � � I1 � � � � Vanasse Aengen Bmstliq Inc. � pM�ed on Recytled Paper ' � � s � � � � r � � � � � � i � � � � , , � . _ � . � __ ' PROJECTi ' pESiGNER $Sfi � . DATE: ... ��}'�r1 G . HYDROLOGIG AND CHANNEL INFORMATION . SKETGH �,,�� -p�*�� " � S7ATION : aS�L � EL._ . �_ _..._ AMW=_ � . _ . • 0� � TW� _ � _ _..... Op =. TWZ = TW — E�.�.00 S� ��5 � � ' E1�,3 � oi • OESIGx DiSLN�RGE , s4r ozs 1 MEAN S7REAM VELOGTY= OZ� CNECK D�SCHARGE �SAT 0�Ofl Q�� / MAX. STREAM VEIOCITY= cu�vEnr HEADWATER COMPUTATiON � � � DESGRIPTION .0 5RE �NLETCONT. OUTLET CONTROL HW=H+ �-LSo � � � .�o .Cost COYAIENTS `" C . � (ENTflINGE rrrc� HW HW IC� H d� �+� TW ho LSo HW 3 �� -.. �. . .. __..'.. .... . � � D ' 2 . u . ...__. . .. io cr�cv�r��.-r�� 5 �g° ,G�G1 1 ,5 .3 ,G t,o5 �, �.7 — I B•a G.8 ►6" �,n i,l, .y �,z �,o �. i. �.10 .� I,� � g.G, . . _ .. 0,0 IS" i.2� �,�j .5 ,�j i;z i.� 1.35 I,� �.q`i Iqo 8•`j � , SUMMARY 8 RECOMMENDATIONS: ' ' ' rl� � ) ' rro�ecc rroJeoia 3s34 Location �� Sheet_of— Calculated by s� Date�L��1 �i ' Checked by Date�_ Title i ' � ' 1'�F�� @ �RR L�inl I ?-o I g9 , ,� i n 3�Oh�7 �� Wc I� ' Q= GG �f 3/z Ref��Jc� ��,�� +rraz �r�r�a� oT �!y��i.�c ' �= Z� �20)��z�3�Z = �F��-SeFs I ' Q�8' � 8 � - B a ia,q�� VeRSSS¢Heng¢0 Bn1811�0,InG . � Printed on Rerycled Paper 1 _ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. * * TA 20 S/N . * * * HMVersion . 3.40 ' ' TR 20 ` Date . 1/16/96 " * * Time : 17:48:25 "' * Project Formula[ion Hydrology ' Input file : C:\BJT\3834DIV.T20 * ' ' Output file : C:\BJT\3834DIV.OUT ' •xxx:x+r:.x.www+.�cK+w�Mwx.w...e+rxw.wx::x:.:...:..:....:x......++*+r:..r.t+iw++r:• �nnnnocx �nnancx �ac�cx x�oacx x x x x x x x�c x x x x x x x x xxxxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x �nc x x x x xxxxxxx xxwcx �� . . . . . . . . . .... . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . .. . .... . .... � . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .... . . ... �. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . ..... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .... . ... � .. . Full Microcomputer Implementation . . . . . . bY . .. . . . Haestad Methods, Inc. ... : : : :: . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Brookside Road * Waterbuzy, Connecticut 06708 * (203) 755-1666 ' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ...Kxxxwi.ixt:ta..80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOGY'�•x.xw.+x.:x+.+.w JOB TR-20 111 TITLE STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM TITLE PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHS 5 RAINFL 7 0.1 8 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 ��. 8 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 ', B 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 � 8 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 8 0.020 0.021 0.022 0.023 0.024 8 0.026 0.027 0.028 0.029 0.030 - 8 0.031 0.032 0.034 0.035 0.036 6 0.037 0.038 0.090 0.041 0.042 8 0.043 0.045 0.096 0.047 0.049 8 0.050 0.051 0.053 0.059 0.055 8 0.057 0.058 0.060 0.061 0.063 8 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.069 0.070 8 0.072 0.079 0.075 0.077 0.079 8 '0.080 0.082 0.089 0.085 0.087 B 0.089 0.091 0.093 0.095 0.097 8 0.100 0.103 0.106 0.109 0.112 8 0.115 0.118 0.121 0.129 0.127 8 0.130 0.134 0.137 0.140 0.194 8 0.198 0.151 0.155 0.159 0.163 6 0.167 0.171 0.176 0.180 0.185 8 0.189 0.194 0.199 0.205 0.210 8 0.216 0.222 0.228 0.235 0.242 8 0.250 0.258 0.266 0.276 0.287 � 8 0.298 0.312 0.328 0.363 0.916 8 0.500 0.589 0.638 0.673 0.689 8 0.702 0.719 0.725 0.734 0.743 8 0.751 0.758 0.766 0.772 0.779 . 8 0 J85 0.790 0.796 0.801 0.806 8 0.811 0.816 0.821 0.825 0.829 8 0.834 0.638 0.642 0.845 0.849 8 0.853 0.857 0.860 0.864 0.867 8 0.870 0.874 0.877 0.880 0.883 8 0.886 0.889 0.892 0.895 0.898 ' 8 0.900 0.903 0.906 0.908 0.910 '. 6 0.911 0.913 0.915 0.917 0.919 8 0.920 0.922 0.929 0.925 0.927 8 0.929 0.930 0.932 0.933 0.935 8 0.936 0.938 0.939 0.991 0.942 - 8 0.944 0.945 0.946 0.998 0.949 8 0.951 0.952 0.953 0.955 0.956 8 0.957 0.958 0.960 0.961 0.962 � B 0.963 0.965 0.966 0.967 0.968 � � � � � � w � � � � � � � � � � � � +.w«K.+..++w+w..�.w.x«60-60 LIST OF INPUT DATA (CONTINUED):.:.x+:x+.:::..:x..::. 8 0.969 0.971 0.972 0.9�3 0.974 8 0.995 0.976 0.977 0.998 0.979 . 8 0.981 0.982 0.963 0.989 0.995 8 0.986 0.987 0.988 0.989 0.990 8 0.991 0.992 0.993 0.999 0.995 ' 8 0.996 0.997 0.998 0.999 1.000 8 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 9 ENDTSL 3 STAUCT 02 REARBAS 8 7.0 00.0 0.0 8 8.0 3.5 0.1067 8 8.6 6.8 ' 0.177 �, 8 8.9 12.45 0.18 'i 9 ENDTBL �A `� �/� � 6 RUNOFF 1 001 1 0.00516k`„" 93'" " 0.11 1 1 1 FAONTf 6 DIVERT 6 002 1 5 2 3.76 1.0 7.1 1 1 1 1 DIVERT fr��r Tr1F��f�7►arl 6 RUNOFF 1 003 1 0.00225 98 0.11 1 1 1 BLDG/r- 6 RUNOFF 1 004 3 0.00998 87 0.41 1 1 1 REAR.� 6 RESVOR 2 02 3 4 7.0 1 1 1 1 1 REARBAS '(t�� 6 ADDHYD 9 005 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 FRO-HLDG 6 ADDHYD 9 006 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 0.10 7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 4.7 1.07 2 O1 10 10-YEAR ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 5.4 1.07 2 O1 25 25-YEAR ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 6.8 1.07 2 O1 99 100-YEAR ENDCMP 1 ENDSOH 2 ......:.�:...::::..::.x:.::.rx+�O OF 80-80 LIST*'wa�+iw+ti�+.ia:.:.ri.aa::::�t:. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOS 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 1 WMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PROJECT FORMOLATION - HYDROLOGY OSEA NOTES THE USERS MANUAL FOR THIS PROGRAM IS THE MAY 1982 DRAFT OF TR-20. CHANGES FROM THE 2/14/74 VERSION INCLUDE: REACH ROUTING - THE MODIFIED ATT-KIN AOUTING PROCEDURE AEPLACES THE CONVEX METHOD. INPUT DATA PREPARED FOR PREVIOUS PROGRAM VERSIONS USING CONVEX ROUTING COEFFICIENTS WILL NOT RUN ON THIS VERSION. THE PREFERRED TYPE OF DATA ENTRY IS CROSS SECTION DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF A AEACH. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE OPTIONAL CROSS SECTION DISCHARGE-AREA PLOTS HE OHTAINEO WHENEVER NEW CROSS SECTION DATA IS ENTERED. THE PLOTS SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR REASONABLENESS AND ADEQUACY OF INPUT DATA FOR THE COMPUTATZON OF "M" VALUES USED IN THE ROUTING PROCEDURE. GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING OA ANALYZING REACH LENGTHS AND COEFFICIENTS (X,M) ARE AVAILAHLE IN THE USERS � MANUAL. SUMMARY TABLE 2 DISPLAYS AEACH ROUTING RESULTS AND ROUTING PARAMETERS FOR COMPARISON AND CHECKING. HYDROGRAPH GENERATION - THE PROCEDURE TO CALCULATE THE INTERNAL TIME INCREMENT AND PEAK TIME OF THE UNIT HYDROGRAPH HAVE BEEN IMPROVED. PEAK DISCHAAGES AND TIMES MAY DIFFER FROM THE PREVIOUS VERSION. OUTPUT HYDROGRAPHS ARE STILL INTERPOLATED, PRINTEO, AND ROOTED AT THE USER SELECTED MAIN TIME INCREMENT. INTERMEDIATE PEAKS - METHO� ADDE� TO PROVIDE DISCHARGES AT INTERMEDIATE POINTS WITHIN REACHES WITHO[IT ROUTING. OTHER - THIS VERSION CONTAINS SOME ADDITIONS TO THE INPOT AND NIIMER005 MODIFICATIONS TO THE OUTPUT. OSER OPTIONS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED AND AOGMENTED ON THE JOB RECORD, RAINTABLES A�DED, ERROR AND WARNING MESSAGES EXPANDED, AND THE SUMMHRY TABLES COMPLETELY AEVISED. THE HOLDOUT OPTION IS NOT OPERATIONAL AT THIS TIME. PROGRAM QOESTIONS OR PROBLEMS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS AT THE SCS NATIONAL TECFIIdICAL CENTERS: � CHESTER, PA (NOATHEAST) -- 215-999-3933, FORT WORTH, TX ISOOTH) -- 339-5242 (FTS) � LINCOLN, NS (MIDWEST) -- 591-5318 (FTS), PORTLAN�, OR (WEST) -- 423-9099 (FTS) '��, OR HYDROLOGY UNIT, ENGINEERING DIVISION, LANHAM, MD -- 436-7383 (FTS) . '�i PROGRAM CHANGES SINCE MAY 1982: � ��I 12/17/82 - CORRECT PEAK RATE FACTOR FOR USER ENTERED DIMHYD CORRECT REACH ROUTING PEAK TRAVEL TIME PRINTED WITH FOLLPRINT OPTION 5/02/83 - CORRECT COMPUTATIONS FOR --- � 1. DIVISION OF BASEFLOW IN DIVERT OPERATZON 2. RYDROGRAPH VOLUME SPLIT BETWEEN BASEFLOW AND ABOVE HASEFLOW 3. CROSS SECTION DATA PLOTTING POSITION � 4. INTERMEDIATE PEAK WHEN "FROM" AREA IS LARGER THAN "THRU" AREA 5. STORAGE ROUTED REACH TRAVEL TIME FOR MULTIPEAK HYDROGRAPH ' 6. ORDERING "FLOW-FREQ" FILE FROM SUMMARY TAHLE R3 DATA 7. BASEFLOW ENTERED WITH READHYD . 6. LOW FLOW SPLIT DURING DIVERT PROCEDURE k2 WHEN SECTION RATINGS START AT DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS ENHANCEMENTS --- 1. REPLACE ➢SEA MANfJAL ERROR CO�ES (PAGE 9-9 TO 4-11) WITH MESSAGE$ 2. LABEL OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH FILES WITH CROSS 5@CTION/STRUCTURE, ALTERNATE AND STORM NO'S 09/O1/83 - CORRECT INPUT AND OUTPUT ERRORS FOR INTERMEDIATE PEAKS CORRECT COMBINATION OF RATING TABLES FOA DNERT CHECK REACH ROUTING PARAMETERS FOR ACCEPTABLE LIMITS ELIMINATE MZNIMOM AEACH TRAVEL TIME WFiEN ATT-KIN COEFFICIENT EQUALS ONE � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP 4 SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 AEV 09/O1/83 PROPOSE� CONDITIONS PREPARED HY: VHH PAGE 2 EXECUTIVE CONTAOL OPERATION INCREM MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS RECORD ID EXECOTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM XSEC2ION 1 TO XSECTION 6 RECORD ID 10-YEAR STAATING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 4.70 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. COND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=10 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SEC2ION 1 PEAK TIME�HRS) PEAR DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 12.30 (RUNOFF) , TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 ROUAS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DZSCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 4.00 DISCHG .02 .04 .03 .02 .OS .04 .03 .06 .09 .04 5.00 DISCHG .07 .OS .07 .OS .08 .06 .09 .06 .09 .07 6.00 DISCHG .10 .11 .07 .11 .12 .08 .11 .13 .08 .12 7.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .15 .15 .15 .21 .24 .25 .25 .26 8.00 DISCHG .26 .27 .27 .28 .28 .29 .36 .32 .30 .38 9.00 DISCHG .41 .34 .90 .92 .93 .49 .49 .53 .98 .55 10.00 DISCxG .49 .56 .59 .68 .63 .70 .73 .74 .89 .88 11.00 DISCHG .99 1.03 1.04 1.24 1.41 1.47 1.78 2.11 9.16 6J8 12.00 DISCHG 10.91 12.21 9.14 6.03 3.18 2.13 1.86 1.70 1.44 1.36 13.00 DISCHG 1.25 1.10 1.18 .98 1.03 .94 .80 .87 .79 .76 14.00 DISCHG .76 ' .76 .76 .65 .61 .72 .69 .61 .99 .57 15.00 DISCHG .61 .61 .50 .57 .99 .46 .57 .49 .96 .46 16.00 DISCHG .46 .96 .46 .96 .96 .34 .92 .45 .39 .31 17.00 DISCHG .19 .27 .30 .37 .31 .19 .27 .30 .19 .27 18.00 DISCHG .30 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 19.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .27 .19 .27 .19 .16 .2'J .19 20.00 DISCHG .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 � 21.00 DISCHG .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 22.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 24.00 DISCHG .04 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.90 WATERSHED INCHES, 12.97 CFS-HRS, 1.07 ACRE-FEE2; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION DIVERT CROSS SECTION 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 11.80 3.76` (DIVERT) • FIRST POINT OF FLAT PEAK OUTPUT #1 HYDROGRAPH TIME(HAS) FIRST HYDAOGAAPH POSNT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 � � a� s � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JpH 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED HY: VHB PAGE 3 9.00 DISCHG .02 .04 .03 .02 .OS .04 .03 .06 .09 .09 5.00 DISCHG .07 .OS .07 .OS .OB .06 .09 .06 .09 .07 6.00 DISCHG .10 .11 .07 .11 .12 .08 .11 .13 .08 .12 7.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .15 .15 .15 .21 .24 .25 .25 .26 8.00 DISCHG .26 .27 .27 .28 .28 .29 .36 .32 .30 .36 9.00 DISCHG .41 .39 .90 .92 .43 .44 .44 .53 .98 .55 10.00 DISCHG .49 .56 .59 - .68 .63 .70 .73 .74 .84 .88 ll.00 DISCHG .99 1.03 1.04 1.24 1.91 1.97 1.78 2.11 3.76 3.76 12.00 DISCHG 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.16 2.13 1.86 1.90 1.49 1.36 13.00 DISCHG 1.25 1.10 1.18 .98 1.03 .94 .80 .87 .79 .76 19.00 DISCHG .76 .76 .76 .65 .61 .72 .64 .61 .99 .57 '� 15.00 DISCHG .61 .61 .50 .57 .49 .96 .57 .49 .96 .46 16.00 DISCRG .96 .46 .46 .46 .46 .39 .42 .95 .34 .31 - 17.00 DISCHG .19 .27 .30 .31 .31 .19 .27 .30 .19 .27 18.00 DISCHG .30 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 .27 .19 19.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .2'7 .19 .27 .19 .16 .27 .19 20.00 DISCHG .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 21.00 DISCHG .15 .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 22.00 DISCHG .27 .19 .16 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 . .15 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 24.00 DISCHG .04 .00 . RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.09 WATERSHED INCHES, 10.28 CFS-HRS, .85 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAI( DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 8.59 (DIVERT) OUTPOT #2 DIVERTED HYDROGRAPH, CROSS SECTION = 7 TIME(HRS) FZAST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOUAS DAAINAGE AAEA = .00 SQ.MI. . 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .90 3.02 � 12.00 DISCHG 7.15 8.45 5.38 2.27 .00 � RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.09 WATERSHED INCHES, 2.69 CFS-HRS, .22 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 3 � PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAR DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 5.70 (Rt1NOFF) ' TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 2.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .06 .09 .04 .04 .09 3.00 DISCHG .09 .04 .07 .OS .09 .04 .04 .OB .06 .OS ' 4.00 DISCHG .OS .08 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .09 .07 .09 .07 .10 .07 .10 .07 .10 .07 6.00 DISCHG .10 .11 .07 .10 .11 .07 ' .10 .12 .07 .10 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP S SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PA55 1 , REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIDNS PREPARED BY: VHH PAGE 4 7.00 DISCHG .12 .12 .12 .12 .12 .17 .18 .18 .19 .19 8.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .29 .21 .19 .29 9.00 DISCHG .26 .21 .29 .26 .26 .26 .26 .31 .28 .31 10.�00 DISCHG .28 .31 .33 .38 .35 .38 .90 .40 .95 .46 11.00 DISCHG .52 .53 .53 .63 .72 .74 .89 1.09 2.03 3.25 12.00 DISCHG 5.13 5.64 9.18 2.79 1.99 .96 .84 .77 .65 .61 13.00 DISCHG .56 .49 .53 .99 .96 .42 .36 .39 .36 .34 14.00 DISCHG .34 .34 .39 .29 .27 .32 .29 .27 .22 .26 15.00 DISCHG .27 .27 .22 .26 .22 .21 .26 .22 .21 .20 16.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .15 .19 .20 .15 .14 17.00 DISCHG . .09 .12 .13 .14 .14 .09 .12 .13 .09 .12 18.00 nZSCxG .13 .09 .12 .08 .12 .OB .12 .OB .12 .08 19.00 DISCHG .12 .08 .07 .12 .08 .12 .08 .07 .12 .OB '�, 20.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .08 .07 .07 .72 .08 .07 .07 � 21.00 DISCHG .07 .12 .OB .07 .07 .07 .0� .07 .07 .07 - 22.00 DISCHG .12 .08 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 23.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.45 WATERSHED INCHES, 6.47 CFS-HRS, .53 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CAOSS SECTION 9 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION�FEET) 12.29 7.01 (RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 7.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 .09 .OS .06 .07 .OB 8.00 DISCHG .09 .09 .10 .10 .11 .11 .12 .13 .14 .14 9.00 DISCHG .16 .17 .18 .18 .19 .21 .22 .23 .29 .26 10.00 DISCHG .27 .28 .29 .31 .39 .36 .38 .41 .43 .46 11.00 DISCHG .50 .55 .59 .69 .70 � .79 .89 1.02 1.30 1.99 12.00 DISCHG 3.16 4.95 6.53 7.00 6.27 4.92 3.62 2.67 2.08 � 1.69 13.00 DISCHG 1.93 1.24 1.10 1.01 .93 .88 .82 .77 .73 .70 14.00 DISCHG .67 .65 .63 .62 .59 .56 .55 .55 .52 .49 15.00 DISCHG .97 .98 .98 .47 .45 .44 .42 .92 .42 .91 16.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .38 .38 .38 .37 .35 .34 .39 .33 17.00 DISCHG .29 .25 .23 .23 .24 .24 .22 .22 .22 .21 16.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .21 .20 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 19.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .18 .17 .17 .18 .18 .18 .17 .17 20.00 DISCHG .17 .16 .15 .16 .17 .16 .15 .16 .17 .16 21.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .16 .16 .15 .14 .13 .13 .13 .13 22.00 DISCHG .19 .15 .16 .15 .14 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 23.00 DISCHG .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 24.00 DISCHG .12 .09 .06 .03 - .02 .O1 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.28 WATEASHED INCHES, � 9.49 CFS-HRS, � .78 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 5 . OPEAATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAR DISCHAAGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION�FEET) � 12.50 5.07 8.29 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOUAS ORAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 6.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .09 .04 .OS .OS 7.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.02 8.00 DISCHG .06 .07 .08 .OB .09 .09 .10 .11 .11 .12 8.00 ELEV 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 9.00 DISCHG .13 .19 .19 .15 .16 .17 .18 .19 .20 .21 9.00 ELEV 7.04 7.09 7.09 7.04 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.06 7.06 10.00 DISCHG .23 .24 .25 .26 .28 .29 .31 .33 .35 .38 ' � 10.00 ELEV 7.06 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.08 7.06 7.09 7.10 7.10 7.11 I 11.00 DISCHG .40 .93 .96 .50 .54 .59 .65 .72 .83 1.02 ' 11.00 ELEV 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.17 7.19 7.21 7.29 7.29 12.00 DISCHG 1.38 2.02 2.91 3.95 4.82 5.07 4.81 4.27 3.65 3.19 12.00 ELEV 7.40 7.58 7'.83 8.06 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.19 8.03 7.91 � 13.00 DISCHG 2.80 2.45 2.15 1.88 1.67 1.48 � 1.33 1.21 1.10 L O1 13.00 ELEV 7.80 7.70 7.61 7.54 7.48 7.92 7.38 7.34 7.31 7.29 . 14.00 DISCHG .93 .86 .81 .77 .73 .69 .66 .63 .61 .59 14.00 ELEV 7.27 7.25 7.23 7.22 7.21 7.20 7.19 7.18 7.17 7.17 . 15.00 DISCHG .56 .54 .53 .51 .50 .49 .47 .96 .45 .49 15.00 ELEV 7.16 7.15 7.15 7.15 7.14 7.19 7.14 7.13 7.13 7.13 16.00 DISCHG .93 .92 .91 .41 .40 .39 .38 .38 .37 .36 16.00 ELEV 7.12 7.12 7.12 7.12 7.11 7.11 7.11 7.11 7.11 7.10 17.00 DISCHG .35 .33 .31 .29 .28 .27 .26 .25 .29 .29 17.00 ELEV 7.10 7.09 7.09 7.08 7.08 7.06 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 18.00 DISCHG .23 .22 .22 .22 .21 .21 .20 .20 .20 .20 18.00 ELEV 7.07 7.06 9.06 7.06 7.06 � 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 19.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 19.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 20.00 DISCHG .18 .17 .17 .17 .17 .16 .16 .16 .16 .16 � 20.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 21.00 DISCHG .16 .15 .15 .16 .16 .15 .15 .15 .14 .14 21.00 ELEV 7.05 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.09 22.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .14 .15 .15 .14 .19 .19 .14 .13 22.00 ELEV 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 23.00 DISCHG .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 .13 23.00 ELEV 7.09 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.09 24.00 DISCHG .13 .12 .11 .10 .OB .06 .OS .09 .03 .02 29.00 ELEV 7.04 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.02 7.02 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 25.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � i � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 6 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.28 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.98 CFS-HAS, .78 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS � OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 5 �, PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAR ELEVATION�FEET) 12.08 14.23 (NOLL) ' TIME(HRS) FIAST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCAEMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 2.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .06 .04 .09 .04 .04 3.00 DISCHG .04 .04 .07 .OS .09 .04 .04 .OB .06 .OS 9.00 DISCHG .OS .08 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .09 .07 .09 .07 .10 .07 .10 � .07 .10 .07 6.00 DISCHG .10 .11 .07 .10 .11 .07 .10 .12 .07 .10 7.00 DISCHG .12 .12 .12 .12 .12 .17 .18 .18 .19 .19 6.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .29 .21 .19 .24 9.00 DISCHG .26 .21 .29 .26 .26 .26 .26 .31 .28 -.31 10.00 oISCHG .28 .31 .33 .38 .35 .38 .90 .90 .45 .46 11.00 DISCHG .52 .53 .53 .63 .72 .74 .89 1.09 2.43 6.27 12.00 DISCRG 12.28 14.09 - 9.55 5.01 1.49 .96 .84 .77 .65 .61 13.00 DZSCHG .56 .49 .53 .94 .96 .42 .36 .39 .36 .34 14.00 DISCHG .34 .34 .34 .29 .27 .32 .29 .27 .22 .26 15.00 DISCHG .27 .27 .22 .26 .22 .21 .26 .22 .21 .20 16.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .15 .19 .20 .15 .14 17.00 DISCHG .09 .12 .13 .14 .14 .09 .12 .13 .09 .12 18.00 DISCHG .13 .09 .12 .08 .12 .08 .12 .OB .12 .08 19.00 DISCHG .12 .08 .07 .12 .OB .12 .OB .07 .12 .OB 20.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .08 .07 .07 .12 .08 .07 .07 21.00 DISCHG .07 .12 .08 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 22.00 DISCHG . .12 .08 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 , 23.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 � RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 6.31 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.16 CFS-HRS, .76 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 6 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAR DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATSON(FEET) 12.09 16.19 . (NOLL) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 2.00 DISCHG .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .06 .04 .09 .09 .09 3.00 DISCHG .04 .04 .07 .OS .09 .04 .09 .08 .06 .OS 4.00 DISCHG .OS .OB .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS .09 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .09 .07 .09 .07 .SO .07 � .10 .07 .10 .07 � � � s � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEASODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 1 REV 09/O1/63 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 7 6.00 oISCHG .10 .11 .07 .10 .12 .08 .11 .13 .09 .12 7.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .14 .15 .15 .20 .22 .23 .23 .24 8.00 DISCHG .25 .26 .26 .27 .28 .28 .39 .31 .31 .36 9.00 DISCHG .38 .35 .39 .41 .42 .93 .49 .50 .96 .53 10.00 DISCHG .50 .55 .58 .64 .62 .68 .71 .73 .80 .89 11.00 DISCHG .92 .96 1.00 1.13 1.26 1.33 1.59 1.76 3.26 7.28 12.00 DISCHG 13.66 16.11 12.96 8.96 6.26 6.04 5.65 5.04 9.30 3.80 13.00 DISCHG 3.36 2.95 2.67 2.33 2.13 1.91 1.69 1.60 1.95 1.35 14.00 DISCHG 1.27 1.20 1.15 1.05 1.00 1.01 .95 .91 .83 .84 15.00 DISCHG .83 .81 .75 .77 .72 .69 .73 .68 .66 .65 16.00 DISCHG .64 .63 .62 .61 .60 .55 .57 .58 .52 .50 � 17.00 DISCHG .93 .45 .44 .43 .41 .35 .38 .38 .33 .36 �. 18.00 DISCHG .36 .31 .34 .30 .33 .29 .32 .29 .32 .28 � 19.00 DISCHG .31 .28 .26 .31 .27 .30 .27 .25 .30 .26 20.00 DISCHG .25 .29 .29 .25 .24 .23 .28 .24 .23 .23 21.00 DISCHG .23 .27 .29 .22 .22 .22 ,22 .21 .21 .21 22.00 DISCHG .26 .22 .21 .21 .21 .21 .27 .21 .20 .20 23.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .20 ,20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 29.00 DISCHG .14 .12 .11 .10 .OB .06 .OS .09 .03 .02 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.29 WATERSHED INCHES, 18.69 CFS-HRS, 1.54 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTNE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 6 RECORD ID 25-YEAR STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN OEPTH = 5.40 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. CONO= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 STORM N0.=25 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 19.33 (AONOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AAEA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 nSSCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .09 .03 .03 9.00 DISCHG .03 .06 ..OS .09 .07 .OS .OS .08 .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .10 .07 .10 .08 .11 .OB .12 .09 .13 .09 6.00 DISCHG .13 .15 .10 .14 .16 .10 .15 .17 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .19 .19 .20 .27 .30 .31 .32 .32 8.00 DISCHG .33 .39 .34 .35 .35 .36 .45 .39 .37 .47 9.00 DISCHG .50 .42 .49 .52 .53 .53 .59 .65 .58 .66 10.00 DISCHG .59 .67 .71 .83 .76 .89 - .88 .89 1.01 1.05 � 11.00 DISCHG 1.16 1.22 1.23 1.98 1.68 1.79 � 2.11 2.99 4.90 7.95 � � � r w � � � � r � � � � � � � �■ � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHH PAGE 8 12.00 DISCHG 12.75 19.21 10.61 7.00 3.69 2.47 2.15 1.97 1.66 1.58 13.00 DISCHG 1.99 1.27 1.36 1.19 1.19 1.09 .92 1.01 .92 .88 14.00 DISCHG .88 .BB .BB .75 .71 .83 .79 .71 .57 .66 15.00 DISCHG .70 .70 .57 .66 .57 .53 .66 .57 .53 .53 16.00 DISCHG .53 .53 .53 .53 .53 .90 .99 .52 .90 .36 17.00 oISCHG .22 .31 .35 .35 .35 .22 .31 .35 .22 .31 18.00 DISCHG .35 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 � 19.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 - 20.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 21.00 DISCHG .18 .31 � .22 .18 .16 .18 .18 .18 .18 � .18 22.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .16 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 23.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 24.00 DISCHG .09 .00 � RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 4.58 WATERSHED INCHES, 15.26 CFS-HRS, 1.26 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION DIVERT CROSS SECTION 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 11.80 3.76' (DIVERT) • FIRST POINT OF FLAT PEAK OUTPOT kl HYDROGRAPH TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 3.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .04 .03 .03 9.00 DISCHG .03 .06 � .OS .04 .07 .OS .OS .OB .06 .OS 5.00 DISCHG .10 .07 .10 .OB .11 .08 .12 .09 .13 .09 6.00 DISCHG .13 .15 .10 .14 .16 .10 .15 .17 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .19 .19 .20 .27 .30 .31 .32 .32 " 8.00 DISCHG .33 .34 .34 .35 .35 .36 .45 .39 .37 .47 9.00 DISCHG .50 .92 .99 .52 .53 .53 .59 .65 .58 .66 10.00 DISCHG .59 .67 .71 .83 .76 .84 .88 .89 1.01 1.05 11.00 DISCHG 1.18 1.22 1.23 1.98 1.68 1.74 2.11 2.49 3.76 � 3.76 12.00 DISCHG 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.69 2.97 2.15 1.97 1.66 1.58 13.00 DISCHG 1.94 1.27 1.36 1.14 1.19 1.09 .92 1.01 .92 .88 14.00 DISCHG .88 .88 .88 .75 .71 .83 .79 J1 .57 .66 15.00 DISCHG .70 .70 .57 .66 .57 .53 .66 .57 .53 .53 16.00 DISCHG .53 .53 .53 .53 .53 .40 .49 .52 .40 .36 � 17.00 DISCHG .22 .31 .35 .35 .35 .22 .31 .35 .22 .31 18.00 DISCHG .35 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 .31 .22 19.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 .31 .22 .18 .31 .22 20.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 .31 .22 .18 .18 - 21.00 DISCHG .18 .31 .22 .16 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 22.00 DISCHG .31 .22 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 23.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .16 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 - 24.00 DISCHG .04 ' .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 3.53 WATEASHED INCHES, 11.74 CFS-HRS, .97 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS r � � � � � � � r � � � � � � � _ s � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 9 PEAK TIME�HRS) PEAR DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) - 12.08 10.57 (DIVERT) � OUTPUT #2 DIVERTED HYDROGRAPH, CAO55 SECTION = 7 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.14 4.19 12.00 nISCHG 8.99 10.45 6.85 3.24 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.53 WATERSHED INCHES, 3.52 CFS-FfRS, .29 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROS$ SECTION 3 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 6.56 (RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FZRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MZ. 1.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .04 .04 .09 .0'7 .OS .OS .OS .OS � 3.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .09 .06 .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .10 .07 .06 .10 .07 .06 .11 .OB .06 5.00 DISCHG .11 .08 .11 .08 .12 .OB .12 .OB .12 .OB 6.00 DISCHG .12 .13 .09 .12 .19 .09 .12 .14 .09 .12 7.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .14 .14 .19 .20 .21 .22 .22 .22 8.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .28 .24 .22 .28 9.00 DISCHG .30 .24 .28 .30 .30 .30 .30 .36 .32 .36 10.00 DISCHG .32 .36 .38 .49 .40 .44 .96 .96 .52 .54 11.00 DISCHG .60 .61 .62 .73 .83 .85 1.02 1.20 2.39 3.74 12.00 DISCHG 5.90 6.99 4.60 3.15 1.66 1.11 .96 .88 .79 .71 13.00 DISCHG .65 .57 .61 .51 .53 .49 .41 .45 .91 .39 . 19.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .39 .33 .31 � .37 .33 .31 .25 .29 15.00 DISCHG .31 .31 .25 .29 .25 .29 .29 .25 .24 .23 16.00 DISCHG .23 .23 .23 ' .23 .23 .18 .22 .23 .18 .16 17.00 DISCHG .10 .14 .15 .16 .16 .10 .14 .15 .SO .19 � 18.00 DISCNG .15 .10 .14 .10 .19 .10 .14 .10 .14 .10 19.00 DISCHG .14 .10 .08 .14 .10 .14 .10 .OB .14 .10 20.00 DISCHG .OB .OB .14 .10 .08 .OB .19 .10 .OB .08 21.00 DISCHG .OB .14 .10 .08 .08 .OB .08 .08 .OB .08 22.00 DISCHG .19 .10 .08 .OB .OB .08 .08 .08 .OB .08 23.00 DISCHG .08 .OB .OS .OB .OB .08 .OB .08 .08 .08 _ 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 5.15 WATERSHED INCHES, 7.98 CFS-HRS, .62 ACAE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 9 � � � � � � � � � r � � � � � r r � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP fi SHOP PEABODY SALEM � SOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITSONS PAEPARED BY: VHB PAGE 10 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK'DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAR ELEVATION(FEET) 12.29 8.35 (RONOFF) TIME(HftS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOORS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .00 .00 � .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 6.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .09 .04 .09 .09 7.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .06 .06 .07 .07 .08 .10 .11 .12 8.00 DISCHG .13 .14 .14 .15 .16 .16 .17 .18 .19 .20 9.00 DISCHG .21 .23 .24 .25 .26 .28 .29 .30 .32 .34 10.00 DISCHG .35 .36 .38 .40 .44 .46 .49 .52 .55 .59 11.00 DISCHG .63 .69 .74 .79 .88 .98 1.10 1.26 1.59 2.37 12.00 DISCHG 3.83 5.97 7.82 8.39 7.45 5.84 9.28 3.15 2.95 1.99 �� 13.00 DZSCHG 1.68 1.96 1.30 1.18 1.09 1.03 .97 .90 .85 .82 '�. 19.00 DZSCHG J8 .76 J9 J2 .69 .66 .65 .64 .61 .57 - �� 15.00 DISCHG .55 .56 .56 .54 .53 .51 .50 .49 .49 .98 16.00 DISCHG .46 .45 .49 .94 .49 .93 .91 .40 .40 .38 17.00 DISCHG .34 .30 .27 .27 .28 .28 .26 .25 .25 .25 18.00 DISCHG . .24 .25 .24 .23 .23 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 19.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .21 .20 .20 .21 .22 .21 .20 .20 20.00 DISCHG .20 .19 .18 .19 .19 .18 .18 .19 .19 .18 21.00 DISCHG .17 .17 .18 .19 .18 .17 .16 .15 .15 .15 22.00 DISCHG .16 .18 .19 .18 .16 .16 .15 .15 .15 , .15 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .75 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 � .15 24.00 DZSCHG .14 .11 .07 .04 .02 .O1 .O1 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 3.94 WATERSHED INCHES, 11.39 CFS-HRS, .94 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.99 6.17 8.49 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDAOGAAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 5.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7:00 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 6.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.00 DISCHG .04 .04 .04 .OS .OS .OS .06 .07 .08 .09 7.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 8.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .11 .12 .13 .19 .14 .15 .16 .17 8.00 ELEV 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.05 7.05 9.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .20 .21 .22 .23 .24 .26 .27 .28 9.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.08 7.08 10.00 DISCHG .30 .31 .33 .34 .36 .38 .90 .43 .45 .48 10.00 ELEV 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.10 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.12 7.13 7.19 11.00 DISCHG .51 .55 .59 .63 .68 .74 .81 .90 - � 1.03 1.25 11.00 eLEV 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.21' 7.23 7.26 7.29 7.36 � �■�r � � w a� � � r� � � � � � � � � �■■ r TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PA55 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 11 12.00 DISCHG 1.70 2.46 3.52 5.00 5.94 6.17 5.81 5.13 4.37 3.67 12.00 ELEV 7.48 7.70 8.00 8.27 8.44 8.99 8.92 8.30 8.16 8.03 13.00 DISCHG 3.19 2.80 2.46 2.17 1.92 1.72 1.55 1.40 1.28 1.17 13.00 ELEV 7.91 7.80 7.70 7.62 7.55 7.49 7.49 7.40 7.36 7.33 � 14.00 DISCHG 1.08 1.01 .95 .89 .85 .87 .77 .79 .71 .68 14.00 ELEV 7.31 7.29 7.27 7.26 7.24 7.23 7.22 7.21 7.20 7.20 15.00 DISCHG .66 .63 .61 .60 .58 .57 .55 .54 .53 .52 15.00 ELEV 7.19 7.18 7.18 7.17 7.17 7.16 7.16 7.15 7.15 7.15 16.00 DISCHG .51 .99 .48 .47 .47 .96 .45 .49 .43 .42 16.00 ELEV 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.19 7.13 7.13 7.13 7.13 7.12 7.12 �I , 17.00 DISCHG .91 .39 .36 .34 .32 .31 .30 .29 .28 .27 17.00 ELEV 7.12 7.11 7.10 7.10 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.08 7.08 7.08 18.00 DISCHG .27 .26 .26 .25 .25 .29 .29 .23 .23 .23 18.00 ELEV 7.08 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 19.00 DISCHG .23 .23 .22 .22 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21 19.00 ELEV 7.06 9.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 20.00 DISCHG .21 .20 �.20 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 20.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 21.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .17 .17 .16 21.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 22.00 DISCHG .16 .16 .17 .17 .17 .17 .17 .16 .16 .16 22.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.04 � 23.00 DISCHG .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 .15 23.00 ELEV 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.04 7.04 7.09 29.00 DISCHG .15 .14 .13 .11 .09 .07 .06 .09 .03 .03 24.00 ELEV 7.04 7.04 7.09 7.03 7.03 7.02 7.02 7.01 7.01 7.01 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 25.00 ELEV 7.01 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 RUNOFF VOLUME AHOVE HASEFLOW = 3.99 WATEASHED INCHES, 11.39 CFS-HRS, .94 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CAO$$ $ECTION 5 - PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK OISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 17.12 (NfTLL) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOUAS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .09 .04 .04 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS 3.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .09 .06 .OS .05 .OS .10 .07 .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .10 .07 .06 .10 .07 .06 .11 .OB .06 . 5.00 �ISCHG .11 .08 .11 .08 .12 - .08 .12 .OS .12 .08 6.00 DISCHG .12 .13 .09 .12 .19 .09 .12 .14 .09 .12 7.00 DISCHG .14 .14 .19 .19 .14 .20 .21 .22 .22 .22 8.00 DISCHG . .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .28 .24 .22 .28 9.00 DISCHG .30 .29 .28 .30 .30 .30 .30 .36 .32 .36 10.00 DISCHG - .32 .36 .38 .44 .40 .44 .96 .46 .52 .54 11.00 DISCHG .60 .61 .62 .73 .83 .85 ' 1.02 1.20 3.48 7.94 � r � � � r � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP 4 SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PAEPAAED HY: VHB PAGE 12 12.00 DISCHG 19.89 16.94 11.66 6.39 1.66 1.11 .96 .88 .74 .�1 13.00 DZSCHG .65 .57 .61 .51 .53 .49 . .41 .95 .91 .39 19.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .39 .33 .31 .37 .33 .31 .25 .29 15.00 DISCHG .31 .31 .25 .29 .25 .29 .29 .25 .29 .23 16.00 DISCHG .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .18 .22 .23 .18 .16 ' 17.00 DISCHG .10 .19 .15 .16 .16 .10 .19 .15 .10 .19 18.00 DISCHG .15 .10 .19 .10 .14 .10 .19 .10 .14 .10 19.00 DISCHG .14 .10 .OB .14 .10 .14 .10 .OB .14 .10 20.00 DISCHG .OB .08 .14 .10 .08 .08 .19 .10 .08 .08 21.00 DISCHG .OB .19 .10 .OB .08 .08 .08 .OB .08 .08 22.00 DISCHG .14 .10 .08 .OB .OB .08 .08 .OB .OB .08 23.00 DISCHG .OB .08 .08 .OB .OB .OB .08 .OB .OB .OB 29.00 DISCHG .02 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 7.57 WATERSHED INCHES, 11.00 CFS-HRS, .91 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 6 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) � 12.09 19.49 (NOLL) � TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 1.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 2.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .09 .04 .04 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS 3.00 oISCHG .OS .OS .09 .06 .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 �, 9.00 DISCHG .06 .10 .07 .06 .10 .07 .06 .11 .OB .06 'i � 5.00 OISCHG .11 .OB .11 .08 .12 .08 .12 .OB .1Z .09 I 6.00 DISCHG .13 .15 .10 .14 .16 .11 .15 � .17 .12 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .19 .19 .25 .27 .28 .29 .30 8.00 DISCHG .31 .32 .33 .34 .35 .36 .42 .39 .38 .45 9:00 DISCHG .47 .43 .48 .51 .52 .53 .54 .61 .59 .64 10.00 DISCHG .62 .67 .71 .78 .76 .82 .86 .89 .97 1.02 11.00 DISCHG 1.11 1.16 1.20 1.36 1.51 � 1.59 1.83 2.10 4.51 9.19 12.00 DISCHG 16.58 19.40 15.16 11.39 7.60 7.28 6.77 6.01 5.12 4.38 13.00 DISCHG 3.83 3.37 3.07 2.68 2.95 2.20 1.96 1.85 1.68 1.56 14.00 DISCHG 1.97 1.40 1.39 1.23 1.16 1.18 1.10 1.05 .97 .98 15.00 DISCHG .97 .99 .87 .89 .84 .81 .85 .79 .76 .75 16.00 DISCHG .79 .73 .72 .71 .70 .63 .67 .67 .61 .56 17.00 OISCHG .50 .52 .52 .50 .48 .91 .94 .45 .36 .41 18.00 oISCHG .92 .36 .40 .35 .39 .34 .38 .33 .37 .33 19.00 �ISCHG .37 .32 .30 .36 .31 .35 .31 .29 .35 .30 20.00 DISCHG .29 .28 .33 .29 .27 .27 .33 .28 .27 .27 21.00 DISCHG .26 .32 .28 .26 .26 .26 .25 .25 .29 .24 22.00 DISCHG .30 .26 .25 .25 .25 .25 .24 .29 .24 .23 23.00 DISCHG .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 29.00 DISCHG .17 .14 .13 .11 .09 .07 .06 .04 .03 .03 25.00 DISCHG .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 � r � � �s � s � �■n s � �■ � � � s � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 2 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 13 RUNOFF VOLUME ASOVE BASEFLOW = 5.15 WATERSHED INCHES, 22.39 CFS-HRS, 1.85 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PA55 2 RECOR� ID EXECIITIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPOT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 6 RECOAD ID 100-YEAR- STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 6.80 RAIN DURATION= 1.00 AAIN TABLE NO.= 7 ANT. MOIST. WND= 2 ALTERNATE NO.= 1 S'PORM N0.=99 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 1 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 18.35 (AUNOFF) TZME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOUAS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 2.00 DZSCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 3.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .07 .OS .OS .OS � .OS .10 .07 .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .12 .09 .OB .13 .10 .08 .15 .11 .09 5.00 DISCHG .16 .12 .17 .12 .18 .13 .19 .19 .20 . .19 6.00 DISCHG .21 .29 .15 .22 .25 .16 .23 .26 .17 .29 7.00 �ISCHG .27 .28 .28 .29 .29 � .90 .49 .95 .46 .47 8.00 DISCHG .47 .48 .48 .49 .50 .50 .63 .55 .52 .65 9.00 DISCHG .70 .58 .67 .72 .73 .73 .74 .88 .79 .90 10.00 DISCHG .80 .91 .96 1.11 1.02 1.13 1.18 1.19 1.39 1.40 11.00 DZSCHG 1.56 7.61 1.63 1.94 2.20 2.27 2.76 3.24 6.37 10.29 12.00 DISCHG 16.40 18.20 13.55 8.92 4.69 3.14 2.73 2.50 2.12 2.01 13.00 DISCHG 1.83 1.62 1.73 1.99 1.51 1.39 1.17 1.28 1.17 1.12 19.00 DISCHG 1.11 1.11 1.11 .95 .90 1.06 .94 .90 .73 .89 15.00 DISCHG .89 .89 .73 .84 .72 .68 .89 .72 .67 .67 16.00 DISCHG .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .50 .62 .66 .50 .95 17.00 DISCHG .28 .40 .99 .95 .45 .28 .90 .94 .28 .40 18.00 DISCHG .44 .28 .90 .28 .40 .28 .40 .28 .90 .26 19.00 DISCHG .40 .28 .23 .39 .28 .39 .28 .23 .39 .28 20.00 DISCHG .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22� .39 .28 .23 .22 21.00 DISCHG .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 22.00 DISCHG .39 .28 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 •22 .22 23.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 - 24.00 DISCHG .06 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE HASEFLOW = 5.96 WATERSHED INCHES, 19.85 CFS-HRS, 1.69 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPEAATION DIVE[tT CROSS SECTION 2 � � � 1� � � � � � � � l� r � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM SOB 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSE� CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 14 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE�CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 11.80 3.76' (DIVERT) • FIRST POINT OF FLAT PEAK OUTPUT N1 HYDROGRAPH � TIME�HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOORS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOIIRS DRAINAGE AREA = .O1 SQ.MI. 2.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .02 .02 .02 .03 3.00 DISCHG .03 .03 .07 .OS .OS .OS .OS .10 .07 .06 4.00 DISCHG .06 .12 .09 .OB .13 .10 .08 .15 � .11 .09 5.00 DZSCHG .16 .12 .17 .12 .18 .13 .19 .19 .20 .19 6.00 DISCHG .21 .24 .15 .22 .25 .16 .23 .26 .17 .24 7.00 DISCHG .27 .28 .2g .y9 .29 .40 .99 .45 .96 .97 8.00 DISCHG .47 .48 .98 .49 .50 .50 .63 .55 .52 .65 9.00 DISCHG .70 .58 .67 .72 .73 .73 .74 .88 .79 .90 10.00 DISCHG .80 .91 .96 1.11 1.02 1.13 1.18 1.19 1.34 1.90 � 11.00 DISCHG 1.56 1.61 1.63 1.94 2.20 2.27 2.76 3.24 � 3.76 3 J6 12.00 DISCHG 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.76 3.14 2.73 2.50 2.12 2.01 13.00 DISCHG 1.83 1.62 1.73 1.99 1.51 1.39 1.17 1.28 1.17 1.12 19.00 DZSCHG 1.11 1.11 1.11 .95 .90 1.06 .94 .90 .73 .89 15.00 DISCHG .89 .89 .73 .84 .72 .68 .89 .72 .67 .67 � 16.00 DISCHG " .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .50 .62 .66 .50 .45 17.00 DISCHG .28 .40 .44 .95 .95 .28 .90 .99 .28 .40 18.00 DISCHG .94 .28 .90 .28 '.40 .28 .40 .28 .90 .28 19.00 DISCHG .40 .28 .23 .39 .28 .39 .28 .23 .39 .28 20.00 DISCHG .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 21.00 DISCHG .22 .39 .28 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 22.00 . DISCHG .39 .28 .23 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 23.00 DISCHG .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 29.00 DISCHG .06 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 9.90 WATEASHED INCHES, 14.64 CFS-HRS, 1.21 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.08 14.59 (DIVEftT) OUTPUT #2 DIVERTED HYDROGRAPH, CROSS SECTION = 7 � TIME(HRS) , FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MZ. 11.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.61 6.53 12.00 DISCHG 12.64 19.49 9.79 5.16 .93 .00 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 4.40 WATERSHED INCHES, 5.23 CFS-HRS, .43 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CAOSS SECTION 3 � PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAR ELEVATION(FEET) . 12.08 8.27 (RONOFF) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP fi SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 15 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOUAS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. .00 DISCNG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 1.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 .09 .OS .OS 2.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .06 .06 .06 .11 .08 .07 .07 .07 3.00 OISCHG .07 .07 .12 .09 .07 .07 .07 .13 .09 .OB 9.00 DISCHG .08 .14 .10 .08 .19 .10 .OB .15 .10 .09 5.00 DISCHG .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .16 .11 6.00 DZSCHG .16 .18 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .25 .28 .28 .28 .28 6.00 OISCHG .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .36 .31 .29 .36 9.00 DISCHG .38 .31 .36 .38 .38 .38 .38 .46 .91 .46 10.00 DISCHG .91 .46 .48 .56 .51 .56 .58 .58 .66 .68 � 11.00 DISCHG .75 .78 .78 .93 1.05 1.07 1.30 1.52 2.96 4.73 12.00 DISCHG 7.45 8.19 6.06 3.97 2.09 1.39 1.21 1.11 .94 .89 13.00 DISCHG .81 .72 .77 .64 .67 .61 .52 .57 .52 .49 19.00 DZSCHG .49 .49 .99 .42 .90 .47 .92 .40 .32 .37 15.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .32 .37 .32 .30 .37 .32 .30 .30 16.00 DISCHG .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .22 .27 .29 .22 .20 17.00 DISCHG .12 .17 .20 .20 .20 .12 .17 .19 .12 .17 18.00 DISCHG .20 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 19.00 DISCHG .17 ' .12 .10 .17 .12 .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 20.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 21.00 DISCHG .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 22.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 23.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 29.00 DISCHG .02 .00 R[1NOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 6.55 WATERSHED INCHES, 9.51 CFS-HRS, .79 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION RUNOFF CROSS SECTION 4 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE�CFS) PEAR ELEVATION(FEET) 12.28 11.04 (RUNOFF) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGAAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 4.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 .02 � 5.00 . DZSCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 .09 .OS .05 ' 6.00 DISCHG .OS .06 .07 .07 .07 .OB .OB .08 .09 .09 � � 7.00 DISCHG .09 .10 .11 .12 .12 .13 .15 .18 .20 .21 � 8.00 DISCHG .22 .23 .24 .25 .26 .26 .28 .30 .31 .32 9.00 DISCHG .34 .36 .37 .38 .90 .42 .44 .96 .48 .51 ' ' 10.00 DISCHG .53 .54 .56 .59 .64 .67 .71 .75 .79 .84 11.00 DISCHG .90 .98 1.05 1.12 1.23 1.37 1.53 1.75 2.19 3.29 12.00 DZSCHG 5.19 7.99 10.39 11.02 9.80 7.65 5.59 9.11 3.19 2.59 13.00 DISCHG 2.18 1.89 1.68 1.53 1.92 1.33 1.25 1.17 1.10 1.05 14.00 DISCHG 1.01 .97 .95 .93 .89 .65 .84 .82 .79 .74 � 15.00 DISCHG .71 J2 .72 .70 .68 .66 � .64 .69 .63 .61 � � � r � � � � � a � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP.fi SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED HY: VHB pAGE 16 16.00 DISCHG .59 .58 .57 .57 .57 .55 .53 .51 .51 .49 17.00 DISCHG .94 .38 .35 .35 .36 .36 .33 .32 .33 .32 18.00 DISCHG .31 .32 .31 .30 .29 .29 .28 .29 .28 .28 19.00 DZSCHG .28 .28 .27 .26 .26 .27 .28 .27 .26 .26 20.00 DISCHG .26 .24 .23 .24 .25 .23 .23 .24 .25 .23 21.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .23 .29 .23 .21 .20 .20 .19 .19 22.00 DISCHG .20 .23 .29 .23 .21 .20 .20 .19 .19 .19 23.00 DISCHG , .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 24.00 DISCHG .18 .19 .09 .OS .03 .O1 .O1 .00 RONOFF VOLUME ABOVE SASEFLOW = 5.28 WATERSHED INCHES, 15.26 CFS-HRS, 1.26 ACRE-FEET; BASEFLOW = .00 CFS ��.i OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 2 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAIC ELEVATION(FEET) 12.39 72.95 8.90 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOI7RS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. 4.00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 4.00 ELEV 7.00 - 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00� 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 DISCHG .O1 .O1 .02 .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 5.00 ELEV 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 6.00 DISCHG .04 .04 .OS .OS .06 .06 .07 .07 .07 .OB 6.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.00 DISCHG .OB .08 .09 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14 .16 7.00 ELEV 7.02 7.02 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.03 7.09 7.04 7.04 8.00 DISCHG .17 .19 .20 .21 .22 .23 .24 .25 .26 .28 8.00 ELEV 7.05 7.05 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.06 7.08 9.00 DISCHG .29 .30 .32 .33 .35 .36 .38 .39 .91 .93 9.00 ELEV 7.08 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.10 7.30 7.11 7.11 7.12 7.12 10.00 DISCHG .45 .47 .49 .51 .54 .57 .60 .63 .66 .70 10.00 ELEV 7.13 7.13 7.79 7.15 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.20 11.00 DISCHG .74 J9 .69 .90 .97 1.05 1.14 1.26 1.43 1.74 11.00 ELEV 7.21 7.23 7.29 7.26 7.28 7.30 7.33 7.36 7.91 7.50 12.00 DISCHG 2.33 3.35 5.19 7.79 12.93 6.63 6.63 6.05 5.27 4.50 12.00 ELEV 7.67 7.96 8.31 8.65 8.90 8.57 8.57 8.46 8.32 6.18 - 13.00 DISCHG 3.81 3.30 2.94 2.62 2.35 2.11 1.92 1.75 1.60 1.98 13.00 ELEV 8.06 7.94 7.84 7.75 7.67 7.60 7.55 7.50 7.46 7.42 19.00 DISCHG 1.37 1.28 1.21 1.14 1.09 1.04 .99 .95 .92 .88 19.00 ELEV 7.39 7.37 7.34 7.33 7.31 7.30 7.28 7.27 7.26 7.25 15.00 DISCHG .84 .81 .79 .77 .75 .73 .71 .69 .68 .67 15.00 ELEV 7.24 7.23 7.23 7.22 7.22 7.21 7.20 7.20 7.19 7.19 16.00 DISCHG .65 .64 .62 .61 .60 .59 .58 .56 .55 .59 16.00 ELEV '7.19 7.18 7.18 7.17 7.17 7.17 7.17 7.16 7.16 7.15 17.00 DISCHG .52 .50 .46 .99 .42 .40 .39 .37 .36 .35 17.00 ELEV 7.15 7.19 7.13 7.12 7.12 7.12 7.11 7.11 7.10 7.10 18.00 DISCHG .34 .39 .33 .33 .32 .31 .31 .30 .30 .29 18.00 ELEV 7.10 7.10 7.09 7.09 7.09 7.09 ' 7.09 7.09 7.08 7.08 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOH 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 17 19.00 DISCHG .29 .29 .29 .28 .28 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 19.00 ELEV 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.06 7.08 7.06 7.08 7.08 7.08 7.08 20.00 DISCHG .26 .26 .25 .25 .25 .25 .29 .24 .29 .29 20.00 ELEV 7.08 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 21.00 DISCHG .24 .23 .23 .23 .23 .23 .22 .22 .21 .21 21.00 ELEV 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 22.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .21 .22 .22 .22 .21 .21 .20 .20 22.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 23.00 DISCHG .20 .20 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 .19 23.00 ELEV 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.06 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.05 I 24.00 DISCHG .19 .18 .17 .14 .12 .09 .07 .06 .04 .03 24.00 ELEV � 7.05 7.05 7.05 7.09 7.03 7.03 7.02 7.02 7.01 7.01 25.00 DISCHG .03 .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 25.00 ELEV 7.01 7.01 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 . RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 5.22 WATERSHED INCHES, 15.11 CFS-HRS, 1.25 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATION ADDHYD CRO55 SECTION 5 PEAR TIME(HAS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAI( ELEVATION(FEET) � 12.06 22.86 (NULL) TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = .10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = .00 SQ.MI. .00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 1.00 DZSCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .09 .09 .09 .OS .OS 2.00 DISCFiG .OS .OS .06 .06 .06 .11 .08 .07 .07 .07 3.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .09 .07 .07 .07 .13 .09 .08 9.00 DISCHG .08 .14 .10 .08 .14 .10 .OB .15 .10 .09 5.00 DISCHG .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .15 .11 .16 .11 6.00 DISCHG .16 .18 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 .18 .11 .16 7.00 DISCHG .18 .18 .18 .18 .18 .25 .28 .28 .28 .28 8.00 DISCHG .28 .28 .26 .28 .28 .26 .36 .31 .29 .36 9.00 DISCHG .38 .31 .36 .38 .38 � .38 .38 .46 .41 .46 10.00 DISCHG .91 .96 .98 .56 .51 .56 .58 .58 .66 .68 11.00 DISCHG .75 .78 .78 .93 1.05 1.07 1.30 1.52 5.57 11.25 12.00 DISCHG 20.08 22.62 15.84 9.13 3.02 1.39 1.21 1.11 .99 .89 13.00 DISCHG .81 .72 .77 .69 .67 .61 .52 .57 .52 .49 19.00 DISCRG .49 .99 .49 .92 .90 .97 .42 .40 .32 .37 15.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .32 .37 .32 .30 .37 .32 .30 .30 16.00 DISCHG .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .22 .27 .29 ' .22 .20 17.00 DISCHG .12 .17 .20 .20 .20 .12 .17 .19 .12 .17 18.00 DISCHG .20 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 .17 .12 19.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 .17 .12 .10 .17 .12 20.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .17 .12 .10 .SO .17 .12 .10 .10 21.00 DISCHG .10 .17 .12 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 22.00 DISCHG .17 .12 .10 � .10 .10 .10 .30 .10 .10 .SO 23.00 DISCHG .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 .10 24.00 DISCHG .02 .00 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP S SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 PASS 3 REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 18 RUNOFF VOLUME AHOVE BASEFLOW = 10.14 WATERSHEO INCHES, 19.72 CFS-HRS, 1.22 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS OPERATIDN ADDHYD CROSS SECTION 6 PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 12.09 26.00 (NOLL) TIME(HRS) FZRST HYDROGAAPH POINT = .00 HOURS TZME INCREMENT = .10 HOUAS DRAINAGE AREA = �.OS SQ.MI. .00 DISCHG .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O1 .O1 1.00 DISCHG .02 .02 .03 .03 .03 .04 .04 .04 .05 .OS 2.00 DISCHG .OS .OS .06 .06 .06 .11 .08 .07 .07 .07 . 3.00 DISCHG .07 .07 .12 .09 .07 .07 .07 .13 .09 .OB 4.00 DISCHG .OB .19 .10 .OB .19 .10 .OB .15 .11 .09 5.00 DISCHG .16 .12 .17 .12 .1'/ .13 .18 .19 .19 .15 6.00 DISCHG .20 .22 .16 .21 .24 .17 .23 .25 .19 .24 7.00 DISCHG .26 .27 .27 .28 .29 .36 .39 .41 .92 .44 8.00 DISCHG .45 .47 .48 .49 .50 .51 .60 .56 .55 .63 9.00 DISCHG .67 .61 .68 .71 .73 .75 .76 .85 .82 .89 10.00 DISCHG .86 .93 .97 1.07 1.09 1.12 1.18 1.21 1.32 1.38 11.00 DISCHG 1.99 1.57 1.62 1.83 2.01 2.12 2.99 2.76 7.00 12.99 12.00 DISCHG 22.91 25.97 21.03 16.92 15.95 8.02 7.89 7.16 6.21 5.39 13.00 DISCHG 4.62 4.02 3.71 3.26 3.02 2.73 2.44 2.32 2.12 1.97 '. 19.00 DISCHG 1.86 1 J7 1.70 1.56 1.48 1.50 1.41 1.35 1.24 1.25 . � 15.00 DISCHG 1.24 1.21 1.11 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.08 1.01 ,98 .96 16.00 DISCHG .95 .93 .92 .90 .89 .81 .65 .86 .77 .74 17.00 OISCHG .65 .67 .66 .63 .61 .53 .56 .57 .49 .53 18.00 DISCHG .59 .96 .51 .95 .99 .93 .98 .92 .97 .42 19.00 DISCHG .47 .41 .39 .95 .90 .95 .39 .37 .94 .39 20.00 DISCHG .36 .36 .43 .37 .35 .35 .41 .36 .34 .34 21.00 DZSCHG .34 .40 .35 .33 .33 .33 .32 .32 .31 .31 22.00 DISCHG .38 .33 .31 .32 .32 .31 .31 .31 .30 .30 23.00 DISCHG .30 .29 .29 .29 .29 � .29 .29 .29 .29 .29 24.00 DISCHG .21 .16 .17 .14 .12 .09 .07 .06 .04 .03 25.00 OISCHG .03 .02 .O1 .O1 .O1 .O1 RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE BASEFLOW = 6.87 WATERSHED INCHES, 29.83 CFS-HRS, 2.46 ACRE-FEET; HASEFLOW = .00 CFS EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP WMPOTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 � RECORD ID � EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDSOH RECORD ID � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP & SHOP PEAHODY SALEM JOB 1 SUMMARY REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 19 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDAAD AND EXECOTNE CONTROL ffiSTROCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(�) AFTEA THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POZNT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL ORAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME - RUNOFF -------------- . ID OPERATION AREA k COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 10 ' XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 - 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 3.90 --- 12.08 12.30 2383.5 xSECTION 2 DIVERT .O1 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 3.09 --- 11.80* 3.76* 728 J XSECTION 7 DIVERT .00 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 3.09 --- 12.08 8.54 *'***'**•* XSECTION 3 R[1NOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 4.45 --- 12.06 5.70 2531.9 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 4.70 23.90 3.28 --- 12.29 7.01 1563.7 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .00 7 2 .10 .0 4.70 23.90 3.28 8.29 12.50 5.07 1132.7 XSECTION 5 ADDHYD .00 7 2 .10 .0 9.70 23.90 6.31 -- 12.08 19.23 6326.4 XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .O1 7 2 .10 .0 9 JO 23.90 4.29 --- 12.09 16.14 . 2398.1 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 25 XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 4.58 --- 12.08 14.33 2776.9 XSECTION 2 DIVERT .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.90 23.90 3.53 --- 11.80• 3.76* 728.7 XSECTION 7 DIVERT .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 3.53 --- 12.08 10.57 *'***•**** XSECTION 3 RUNOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 5.15 --- 12.08 6.56 2913.5 XSECTION 4 RUNOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 3.94 --- 12.29 8.35 1869.2 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 3.94 8.49 12.99 6.17 1378.3 XSECTION 5 A��HYD .00 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 7.57 -- 12.08 17.12 7609.2 XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .O1 7 2 .10 .0 5.40 23.90 5.15 --- 12.09 19.99 2888.3 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 99 XSECTION 1 A[1NOFF .O1 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 5.96 --- 12.08 16.35 3557.1 XSECTION 2 DIVERT .O1 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 4.90 --- 11.80* 3.76* 728.7 XSECTION 7 DIVERT .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 9.40 -- 12.08 14.59 *""*'*•** XSECTION 3 RUNOFF .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 6.55 --- 12.08 8.27 3675.5 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .00 ' 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 5.28 -- 12.28 11.09 2464.2 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOA .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 5.22 8.90 12.39 12.45 2778.1 XSECTION 5 ADDHYD .00 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 10.14 --- 12.08 22.86 10161.7 i XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .O1 7 2 .10 .0 6.80 23.90 6.87 -- 12.09 26.00 3862.8 � � � i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � TR20 XEQ 1/16/96 STOP fi SHOP PEABODY SALEM JOB 1 SUNASARY REV 09/O1/83 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PREPARED BY: VHB PAGE 20 SIIMMAAY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CFS) AT XSECTIONS AND STRUCTURES FOR ALL STORMS AND ALTERNATES XSECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS. . . . . . . . . . ID (Sq MI) 10 25 99 � . STRUCTURE 2 .00 ALTERNATE 1 5.07 6.17 12.95 XSECTION 1 .O1 ALTERNATE 1 12.30 14.33 18.35 XSECTION 2 .O1 ALTERNATE 1 3.76 3.76 3.76 _XSECTION 3 00 ALTERNATE 1 5.70 - 6.56 8.27 X�ECTION 4 00 ALTERNATE 1 7.01 8.35 11.04 � �SSECTION 5 .00 ' ALTERNATE 1 14.23 17.12 22.86 _XSECTION 6 O1 ALTERNATE 1 16.14 19.44 26.00 � XSECTION 7 00 � ALTERNATE 1 8.59 10.57 14.59 ' ' 1 ' ' 1 1 ' , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' CLOSED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ' , v\�J�D3834�various�tocfly.doc ' � �n � , ' Project � a i� Project# �3'f" Lcea6on �S Sheet—of— Calculated by �"�"r Date � Checked by M� Date � TiUe � �rioaa� M�� G?= c�� -��N� M,�s �h��y CB � /brEk��l6/� �h1"Pt�iz lD 'Fr(a /D-3 ITDT+tI. = ,G�5�G ��J �Zfi l�-[. X , 5 = .2?7 ' �e�J � 19A-� X . 3 = , OG q/ �S = ,u5> C ' '�G ' ' 75� �Naer ��tv� �- Ln-��► S = 3o-Iz/S -.z4 J; 3.Z�� r= 75�3,z : 2 �ec IGy' 1��D S=,bIZS �(= Z,Z� l�5 /`z,t= 755� 9P�y�c � 5 �,,�► n�,� ' � �f vrE � �y sNyr�cT�onl Tt1� �it Pa�K��J C� f��.fj ��w B� Dfhi�NE� �n� �c� T� 's = 3n��n1 ' �ow, F�d�� l0�- Ti�Srrl �H-aeT Au GBs v�1��t- ' BE �tSr�iN�j� (^��TH J) 5, 3 �N/M� S��r-(y �F ATfKICH�J / �$� p,� <G�A = ,G� �5� 3)��45� = 1, 55C�S ' � GB T�rn� = ,4$�-� ' �,w�v = .3JA-� x,9 = , 33 t��J ; . �� Ac x , 3 = -�33 , . 3�3/ 9� - . �G CB�Q= .7G `,48�(5.3� = 1� 93 1 ' � Vanasse Hangea Bmstllq Inc. � Prinled on RecydM Paper ' ' ' r�D Project y{" �" Project# 3�3'�' ' Loca[ion �Ct�tl Y �ct lM Sheet Z of_ Calculated�y� Date� ' Checked b Date � �1� � Tide t � � ' TCi ,7.�" 1�� £-�� .03 X .3 = , og9 �wtP �21 z.9 ' , �09 ' ,�j3 _. Q= ,83 �53XZ4) =r�obc�5 ' G� 6 A� _, �6 � �= ,9 � �s�crroa Q= , I�15.3)G9) =, gG cr-5 ' GB G 1 �� ' �� =,� ' a= ,4 (,9)(5,�) =r,9� cFs c� �z ' A�h = ,2� a� c-.� ' a = .Z9 �5,3) �,�� = �.34� c�s � c$ 13 A�A � D� I�I �- ,9 ' Q - , I°I(,9)(�3) =, �i I cFs Cr3 I 4 1 a = �, ►� � c= ,9 - , f,q)(s�3 = ,� 1 c�5 V808SSC Heilg¢0 BNSIIIO,]RG � Prinled on RecyclM Paper ' ' � �n ■ , � ' �ro;ecc �J'+5 rro;ec�# 3�'�" Locadon � C Sheet 3 of— Calculated by Date��— �i ' Checked by �� Date 1 �17� TiHe ' CB 15 � = Q,� � C = o.90 Q =o, ¢0�5.'3)l.9) = i,91 I � �� a ' A - D. 1� G = ,q ' �_ � ►7 (g,3)�.9) =,S► �� y � �- = o,�r G= , 9 ' Q= �% (5;3) , 0� = , �Z GT� 2a 1 �' O� �= ,9 ' a= ,qf5,3�1.09)..¢z � �B zr � = o. i� �= ,9 � � = , 9 (��3)( 18) =,�5 '11 � � � �➢Z � A� G7�g3o/Z = 31�}�5= b��2AC ' C = ,q cA= �G� Q : ,9�5,3)(.�2� ; 3,�� 1 Vanesse Hangen Bmsttin,Inc. � � Prinled on Recycled Paper I 1 � 1 1 r � � ) ' �o�ecc rro�ecc# 3�3Q' L,ocation CkE2� C�CMSheet Q'of Calculated by �� Date 1�� ' Checked by�(� Daze � Tide � �D 1 C� 3 � � h= baayF = . oi4hc A�=�f�SO = � IoA� ' ' ' �= .q GA-=.61� C= , 9 CA = . 09 ', �' � �o�z �5�3) = , o�� , 4q ' T� z cB 3d � A.�aa s� =�Ala A =ASoa =, i i c=,� C� = b�G►z C=,9 c�:A99 ' Q= o. oG� cFs Gt= ,53 TD.3 ' A = q-Q�oOyF ' • II �G �=,9 c�= � 099 ' A = , 53c�5 'rD � , A� = 21D� - O,OQ�� =�� ca = 0,043 1 � ��Z3 ' � 5 A =S�bD > p , I Z�} � c=.q c� = , �► � � = � 59 , T� G �= ►41gD5F = o,32u ' G=,�1 Ck = -25 a - �.sh � Vanaue Hangen Brustliq Inc. � Prin�M on Rerycled Paper 1 � � � Storm Drainage Computations ► � �" a.� u ' � � //�/ �- • �. : /(/1 / � � � :� � o� • �I� Y � • , �� -----.-------�--�----. ��-�-�� / Y I �� __----------------.-� —� • • '� ��-�--��m � �� —__-----------�---�... —� , i ��m-�--�� " �� —__--------�--�------- —��-�--�� i �� --_------�---------... S� , � �m�-�--��' m�� --��------------w------ —��-- �----�� % 1� �D',��m i� —�---��-----�-- ----�. —��.�..�� i I —__------------------. —��-�--�� —�—.-----..----------. —__------------------. —��--��----� % ��m�� %� � � �__---------_------�-�/- —� , � �I\��-�--�� '� / I ��AiJ� --_-------------.� -.■ � r ' � ��-�--�� I,/ � � � / �� : S4orm DYainage Comput�tions ' . � �� rv. - . � i ' .� . - - .. _ II�1L'I � :. , . : . . :. . - ,. :, . ��,a � . ��0�� -�� -�5�� % , �� "� ' ' I��64 ' ��0�� . �� ' ' � �� - - [�1'J�� - � � i"� '�''�1�� ' : ��l��1� �� - �� @�� : � • , F�7 , , ��fl � �- i�� 0�� S��e�� : , �� -_ �� - - � ,; OS � % � ��f�'il�� ` . �� - �� :a�� 5��::C:::::��:::::_:: �.��.��.� -- � , , � ; o� - -- �� ........��.�....... .��.�...�..��.�...�... �:■ ':.::::::::��: ':�::�:::: ��.�.�..�� .. � �� ; � � � Storm Drainage Computations ; � s,,, . � � ..0 - . � • �- . �. /�' i . : . . . • ui-1 i �� ----------.-----��.----. —��--.�----� � � � ��' fii�t'�� —__--------------5---� ----�--�---------------� —��Ifil�d']L�----�� ' ��' : � - , —__--------_----�---�� —�� ' ��-----� � � ��---. -------�--.--.-------. —�� '�� -----�� '��' �� --�_■.---------.----�--. —�iYl�'1�'7---�----�� % ., �� " � i �� —�--------------��---��-� �� " �� ' -----��G�L'� 'i �lbi�m —_---..----�---��-�---.� -�� afrl�� -�� -��i�� `' �� Q�m� ; �� -�� m '�'s�� '611 ��E�il '� 0 " ' % �� , � � L�=�fF.�1�61��1 �� ; �m� = - �� jJ(�� Vanasse Hanger�Brustlfn,/nc. �l•• • Consuliing F'nginrcrs anJ Planncrs � � � � � � � 101 Walnut SI.,Watcrtuwn,MA 021R • / envz� mu Name �PQ6GdV b4�fiW Proj. No. � Design Parameters Client � Date � _�Year Storm Subject Computed bv��'C_� � "Min.Pipe Size Checkedby� n=!� LOCATION AREA c c•a � FLOW TIME (Min.) � a DESIGN PIiOFILE DESCRIPTION FROM TO (A�.) C•A �'b. Dlk� Pipe T� Ci9 g�� S� Olull �e LengtA Fall �� m �y�� M �N ,Gb 5•3 3,49 16 �ODf G�G 3,7G ' , ID Q,I �'� 5.� �MF+� te<, ,G� �i.3 3,�f9 �� Oo4 G,G4 3•14 80� .30 q�2 �, 4.1 �3d f� , II ,091 5.3 .�3 al l,zl 3, lti ,(5 g,¢ G,l; �- �i �'� ,� .9 .G5 5.3 3,A4 �L� .D3G G, G B,G6 a� I 0 — G.5 5.50 1?/!0 �' ' 1 ' � �p.py �`� Drainage and Erosion Control ' �o.o 9.0 8.0 7A ' 6.0 5.0 4.0 ' S.0 �� $ sp y�qS ' 2.0 bS ��yFaqs 7.5 S r qqs F'qs FREQUENCY (YRS. ) 2 y� � °^s ' L 1.0 9 � .8 a •% ' N 6 � .5 L U C .y , } F-� � Z Z ' W F- z .15 J J ' a 1 z .09 i Q .08 � � .07 � � , .O6 � .OS .06 , .07 , .02 ' .01 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 30 d0 50 60 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 78 24 (MINUTESI DURATiOy (HOURS) ' ' Figure 10-4. Intensity — Duration — Frequency Curve for Boston, MA ' ' ' . ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' WILDLIFE HABITAT EVALUATION ' ' v\vTD3834�various�tocfly.doc I , Vanasse Han en Brustlin,Inc. r Transportation ' � Land Development Environ¢tental Services � 101 Walnut Street ' P.O.Box 9151 Watertown,MA 02271 6779241770 FAX 617 924 2286 1 ' � ❑ ❑ ❑ Memorandvm Transmittal Meeting Notes Phone Notes To: Rachel Freed Date: 18 January 1996 � Department of Environmental Porotection Northeast Regionel Office 10 Commerce Way ' Woburn,MA 01801 Project No.: 0383426 From: Charles Katueka,P.W.S. (j� Re: Wildlife Habitat Evaluation ' Senior Environmental Scientist DEP F51e Nde.55-369 and 64- 238,Proposed Stop&Shop Peabody/Salem,MA ' In response to your request dated December 27, 1995,VHB has prepazed the following ' Wildlife Habitat Evaluation in conformance with the procedures specified at 310 CMR 10.59. Based on field inspections and the following discussions,we are oFthe opinion that all important wildlife habitat has been eliminated from the project site,by prior human � activities and that the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on the project site is not significant to the protection of wildlife habitat. ' Introduction VHB has conducted numerous field investigations of the subject properties for a variety of purposes. On 11 January 1996 VHB biologists conducted a site investigation for the express � purpose of collecting data necessary to evaluate the remaining wildlife habitat of Bordering Land Subject to Flooding at the project site. The project site is located just east of Howley Street on the Peabody/Salem municipal line. The following information was collected to ' describe the vegetative and soil characteristics of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on the site and to summarize direct evidence of wildlife. * Note:At the time of this site visit,the ground was covered with snow to an average ' depth of about 21/2 feet with drifts up to 4 feet deep making it impossible to note some topographical features and most herbaceous communities. ' General Site Description This site is a previously developed lot situated along the Peabody/Salem municipal line ' (Figure 1). Formerly developed portions of the site are partially covered by broken pavement and several concrete pads remain where buildings formerly stood. Several buildings remain on the site(Figure 3A-1). ' ' 0196/SIm/03834-AF8 ' � , 2 ' Date: 1S January 1996 Ref: 03834.26 ' A portion of the site is located within the 100-foot buffer zone to off-site Bank resource areas associated with the North River Canal. There are no Bordering Vegetated Wetlands on-site or within 100 feet of the site. Portions of the site are also within the 100-year floodplain of ' the North River Canal. Based on FEMA flood studies,the limits of Bordering Land Subject to Flooding an-site occur at elevation 11 feet N.G.V.D in the City of Salem and at elevation 12 feet N.G.V.D.in the City of Peabody,the 100-year flood elevation. When the elevation of ' floodwaters in the North River Canal rises above 9 feet, the 10-year flood elevation, floodwaters overtop the ac�jacent railroad tracks and onto the site. tPlant Community Composition and Structure The southeastem portion of the site and the steeply-sloping areas along the southern ' boundary contain a second-growth forest community dominated by Norway maple, (Acer pl¢tanoides),red oak(Quercus rubra),tree-of-heaven(Ailanthus¢ltissim¢),black cherry (Prunus serotina), and staghorn sumac(Rhus typhin¢). Areas covered by asphalt pavement ' in good condition or by concrete building pads are unvegetated. Species of grass and shrubs established within the cracks in the pavement and on the compacted fill or exposed subsoils on the site include common mugwort(Artemisia uulgaris), Queen Anne's lace(D¢ucus carota), and ragweed(Ambrosi¢artemisiifolia). The unpaved portions of the remainder of ' the site area partially vegetated by invasive, weedy,herbaceous plants and clumps of shrubs, saplings, and small trees. , Vegetated portions of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding within the 10-year flood elevation support an herbaceous plant community with scattered thickets of shrubs and small trees. The following paragraphs describe the plant communities within the 10-year ' floodplain(see Figure 2). Two clumps of woody vegetation separated by a dirt road oceur between the saw mill building and the MBTA railroad tracks(Figure 3A-2). The more northerly of the two , thickets is dominated by small trees,primarily quaking aspens (Populus tremul¢)up to appro�cimately 8 inches diameter at breast height(dbh)and approumately 30 feet in height. Box-elder(Acer negundo), European buckthorn(Rh¢mnus c¢thartica),black cherry, and tree- � of-heaven also grow in this area,particularly in the western portion of the thicket. A thicket dominated by shrubs and saplings occurs between the saw mill and the dirt road to the north. This thicket is dominated by woody vegetation that is generally under 15 Feet in ' . height and 3 inches dbh. Box-elder and quaking aspen are the dominant species in this thicket. Other species include American elm(Ulmus american¢),grape (Vitis sp.), bittersweet(Cel¢strus orbiculata), common mugwort,and goldenrod(Solidago sp.). , A shed roof with timber supports is present near the center of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding. A clump of shrubs and small trees occurs to the north of this roof between the roof ' and a dirt road. Dominant trees in this area include quaking aspen and gray birch(Betr�la populifolia), with several aspens up to approacimately 6 inches dbh and the birches up to 8 inches dbh and up to apprmcimately 30 feet in height. Red oak(Quercus rubr¢)is the dominant shrub in this area. Other common shrubs include gray birch, willow(S¢lix sp.), ' ' 0196/SIm/03834-AFS ' , 3 ' Date: 18 January 1996 Ref: 03834.26 ' and box-elder, with occasional saplings of English oak(Quercus robur),American elm, crabapple (Malus sp.),red pine(Pinus resinos¢), and pin cherry(Prunus pennsyluanica). ' The easternmost portion of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on-site contains a wooded community dominated by small trees and shrubs. Staghom sumac,black cherry, and Norway maple are the dominant species in this area. The sumacs occur primarily at the � outermost edges of the wooded area and are generally under apprmcimately 15 feet in height. The cherries are]arger with some individuals approaching 8 inches in dbh and approximately 25 feet in height, Other species growing in this area include crabapple, ' multiflora rose,American elm,bittersweet, and red oak. A narrow line of shrubby vegetation, primarily staghorn sumac, extends westward along the edge of the railroad right-of-way. Other species growing in this area include Norway maple, ' black cherry, common mugwort, and goldenrod. The southeastern comer of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding is vegetated by a , woodland community(Figure 3B-2). This community is an extension of the wooded community growing on the steep slopes between the site and the residential neighborhood to the south and east. The wooded portion of the BLSF is dominated by Norway maple, some of which approach 20 inches in dbh. Other trees growing in this area include occasional ' American elm,black cherry,and box-elder. The southern"bulge" of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding lies within a fill area ' expanded in size by excavation into the adjacent hillslope. This area supports a sparse shrub-dominated community in which staghorn sumac and box-elder are the dominant species. Other species noted in this area include red oak,Norway maple,American elm, ' blackberry(Rubas¢llegheniensis),common mugwort,goldenrod, tansy(T¢n¢cetum uulgare), and Japanese knotweed(Polygonr�m cuspidatum). Generally,the woody vegetation in this area is under appro�cimately 15 feet in height and 4 inches in dbh. There are several standing dead trees greater than 10 inches dbh in this portion of the BLSF. These trees � appear to have been killed by fire. No nesting cavities were observed in these trees. 1 Soil Composition and Hydrology Soils on the site were characterized at three test pits within the limits of the 10-year floodplain(Figure 2). ltvo of these pits were also located within 100 feet of the limits of , state-regulated Bank. The third was located near the southem limits of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding, approximately 200 feet from the limit of Bank. Data from each of the test pits are presented below , Test Pit 1 , 0-5" Black coarse gravelly sand and fly ash Appro�cimately 40%o composed of 1"stones,fly ash, slag 10YR2/1 , , 0196/SIm/03S34-P.FS ' � 4 Date: 18 January 1996 , Ref: 0383426 ' 5-17" Fill - coarse gravelly sand 20%stones 1-2"in diameter 10YR4/4 ' 17"+ Buried layer of fly ash,same as on surface Saturated at 20". Water table observed at 26" ' Old boards and debris were found on the surface with a few large cobbles throughout. Less than 1" of leaf litter was observed on the surface. ' Test Pit 2 0-2" Loamy sand with rounded stones 1-3"in diameter ' 10YR3/4 2-16" Gravelly sand with rounded stones 1-3"in diameter and a few]arger cobbles 6- ' 8"in diameter. No redox features 10YR5/4 ' 16-30"+Coarse sand, single grain,loose and saturated with very few stones. No water table observed at 30" 10YR5/4 � Test Pit 3 0-8" Coarse sand,coated,granular,moist,gravelly ' 20% 1" stones fly ash mixed with metallic debris(nails, springs, etc.) 10YR3/2 � 5-28"+ Black,very coarse, gravelly with fly ash,slag, debris (a brick was found at 26"), and stones 1-3"in diameter. , Saturated at 24". Water table observed at 26". Extremely stony at 28"with many small rounded stones. These soil investigations indicate that the soils on-site are greatly disturbed and are ' composed primarily of fill material. The soils are composed of primarily sandy material with a]arge amount of gravel, small stones, and debris from industrial activities. None of the soil pits exhibited any natural horizons or soil profiles. , Wildlife Observed ' during the 11 January 1996 site investigation,few animals and very little evidence of the presence of wildlife were observed in the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on site. American crows(Coruas 6rachyrhynchos) and rock doves(Columb¢ liuia)are the only species ' that were actually observed on site. A squinel nest was observed in the trees in the eastern 0196/SIm/03834-AF8 ' i , ' 5 I ' Date: 18 January 1996 Ref: 03834.26 ' portion of the BLSF. A bird nest,probably that of a catbird(Dumetell¢c¢rolinensis)or a northern mockingbird(Mimr�s polyglottus)based on nest structure and habitat, was observed in the shrub thicket on the north side of the saw mill building. ' Black-capped chickadees(P¢rus atric¢pillres), a northern mockingbird, several European starlings(Sturnell¢magna)and a downy woodpecker(Picoides pubescens)were observed on ' adjacent properties,but were not observed on-site. A downy woodpecker nest cavity was observed in a tree-of-heaven on the opposite bank of the North River Canal. An American black duck was observed in the stream. Several leaf squirre]nests were observed in the , trees on the steep slope south of the BLSF. No mammals were observed on-site, and no mammal tracks were observed in the snow. The black duck is the only species of wetlands dependent wildlife observed in the vicinity of the site. ' Summary:Wildlife Habitat Evaluation ' The Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations state that certain portions of Bordering Land Subject to Flooding are likely to be significant to the protection of wildlife habitat. These areas include all areas on the 10-year floodplain;those areas of BLSF within 100 feet of Bank or Bordering Vegetated Wetlands, whichever is further;and al]vemal pool I ' habitat on the 100-year floodplain. Within these areas, the hydrologic regime, plant community composition and structure, soil composition, and prmcimity to water bodies and Bordering Vegetated Wetlands are presumed to provide provide important food, shelter, and ' migratory, wintering and breeding areas for wildlife. Portions of these areas that have been so extensively altered by human activity that their important wildlife habitat functions have been eliminated are not,however, considered significant to the protection of wildlife habitat. ' Such"altered" areas include paved and graveled areas,buildings, roadways, and railroad tracks(including ballast and embankments). This site fits these "altered"areas criteria. The Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on this site provides only limited wildlife habitat � values and is not likely to be significant to the protection of wildlife habitat. While the site may provide habitat for some wildlife species, some of the time,the altered nature of the site reduces the significance of the resource area in terms of the protection of wildlife habitat for ' the following reasons: 1. Proximitv to water: ' The BLSF on-site is separated,by appro7cimately 30 feet,from the wetland resource areas of the North River Canal by an active railroad;an area which,in accordance with 310 CMR 10.57(1)(a)(3),has been"so extensively altered by human activity..." ' that its "...important wildlife habitat functions have been effectively eliminated." The Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations state that"lower floodplains, because of their proximity to water and vegetated wetlands, can provide important ' shelter for wildlife which needs to migrate between such areas, or between such areas and uplands. The'edge'where floodplain habitat borders vegetated wetlands or water bodies is frequently very high in wildlife richness and diversity." The railroad tracks form an unvegetated corridor which isolates the vegetated Banks of the North River eCanal from the partially vegetated BISF on-site and eliminates any edge habitat that , 0196/SIm/03S34-AFS � ' ' s ' Date: 1S January 1996 ReL 0383426 ' would otherwise directly connect the floodplains on-site with the water and vegetated wetlands of the North River Canal. Additionally,the railroad tracks severely limit the function and importance of the BLSF as a migratory corridor between the stream,the ' BLSF on-site,and adjacent uplands. 2. Plant community composition and structure: ' Portions of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding on-site support a plant community dominated by a weedy herbaceous community with scattered thickets of shrubs and , small trees. While the species present and the structure of the plant community can provide small amount of shelter,nesting, and food resources for some wildlife speeies, the plant community lacks certain characteristics that generally enhance the importance of the resource area in terms of wildlife habitat. For example; I, ' aJ Much of the woody vegetation within the BISF is small and in such early stages of ecological successional,following the former industrial uses,that the �I ' trees and shrubs are too small to provide nesting and roosting cavities or are not mature enough to set fruit and mast crops. Living and dead trees of sufficient size to provide cavities are present on-site,particularly in the southernmost portion of the BLSF. However, no such cavities were observed in ' any of these trees. . b.) Because much of the vegetated area is dominated by recent herbaceous and �I ' young shrub communities developed over compact fill,a wel]-developed layer of leaf litter or other forest floor detritus,which is very import,ant for almost all species of reptiles,amphibians and small mammals as well as numerous i ' invertebrates,is not present. 3. Soil comnosition: � , Due to the nature of the site, as a fill area constructed for development of the abutting railroad, and its past industrial uses,the soils are primarily comprised of fill material and debris(including fly ash, slag, springs,nails, and bricks)which limits the use and I ' usefulness of those soils as burrowing sites. The site's filled land has been eacpanded into the abutting slopes by excavation. The railroad right-of-way, nearly all of the 100-foot Buffer Zone on the site, and most of the ' area of the Bordering Land Subject to Flooding within the 10-year floodplain is filled land developed by the railroad. , Based on the lack of real continuity with the North River Canal,the characteristics of the limited vegetational community which is present in some areas of the lower floodplain, and the absence of bunowable soils from the study area, we are of the opinion that the important ' wildlife habitat functions of the study area have been effectively eliminated by past human activity. Areas of the project site within 100 feet of the Bank of the North River Canal or within the 10-year floodplain, whichever eactends farther onto the site, are not likely to be significant to the protection of wildlife habitat. � , ' 0196/SIm/03834-AFS ' �e��' ��O :,a� '�� .ia'�3 � � � _ �� _� .._: �iy �" ':• ...� '`a��,. %- � � �'' -.�..�� • � �� - �',�,", �.�� %� ;' -- — � ,��i�''�i� ��.� ,� �; ��►�`�-�� :_� �-,�� .\ ��' -= � �,� � � �� _ ' � �, ,;� ° � � e � � � �� ,. .�� _= - '1�� ► � ��.�,` 6� .. ��`,ry .��': ��.��, ��, �,o � ��.��'� '��``�� ':/_ �� •s �� '�:�.� �, � ,�� /y�� / '��` ��, ��yi� v ��'�,,i�'� � ' � �: �.� � � , � r, � : ` �4 ,� �� ;��- ,� � �.��,: �� ;��, :�. �� , .��1. _ _ � ,� � � ��,' ' �� o� �� i -- - ., �-��h�►!'_ ��r��' ��,,�� 1 � , � ► _ - - -:�e� . �� .�.�� -� � � �'�j� �� ' � I� `14j�`�S�Pi��i!..r�`��!�►h��'.�o�► e ! � .- � -�� l��.:� ' . Af/ s�`��'�� o�� ,�'� �� • ` • . -,`��y��0�d��" -"-��"�-�j'b��o; "'^��i ��. � ' ` ��'9.:��,�:��j�� !��0 � r� ��, � �� -�� ` � —�+ � .� y� �r � .��ti�� ; �'�� `�, �� ;� �' ��' �- � �,�-�� . -��95:�,�r�� G . �� . , ,., . • � �� ,,-,� � I � / � ;� �,`.,.� ��`\��l�si.��l�y��`A��' •��•�•-�� :*.�!+�;o'�t�� . �9 � � �J �� —� �_ - ��.� �y�,� ' d. s �� 1�'" .rGQ:-r�► +►�°'I��'�/��4\�'y��=.�� ''�� 0 c.a �: , � �,','� A.� � /'�� `,�` o��i��•-�•;w� � S�� '�'` ��o�)f�l��3.. ; � ' ' ��, r �, i r��.� �� ;� � ��i�i� ::� ,�I��. �I, ,. - , � � ��`,� . •I ,,, ',• � � � \ ��., �". O ,� ��m�S�,.. .� �� '�� .. _ �� !:�j I � 1i V�I�� ' �,, ;�°r; f . � ,r��,�� Q "Q'.�;�" �q,N � . ��►�� a�c s.� _. �,- ,�g%i' n' 1�� 4,��.� 111�� ` e..--. �� i � �a � � �� =�� °'��. � ; � �J � � �v. ,r��"� im�a��-. / � •�� ,,� ;, �� . , �� ,s� --� ��, , > ��or� u . � �t � � '�'� � ' � �� "`;�'� � ', �� ` ;� r , I x� � �.��, ; � �� i �� ' � \ '�� ,��►i � � � . � ��`,y �ilf1:�, �,i•_ � \\� ��w�Al� e�r.a., _ � � � . �`� e. � ...��„ I�► `=_� � �� .� . _ Vanassc Han�cn Brustlin,Inc. � . � ' ' � ' Date: 18 January 1996 R,ef: 03834.26 ' cc: Stop& Shop Supermarket Co., Inc. M. McNeice ,VHB ' � ' , , ' ' ' ' , ' t ' ' ' 0196/SIm/03834•AFS � ' GP.63&'ia 383aWHE OVII961a:n ' � Existing Buildings � � Building Pads ' � r�w�� Woody Vegetation � ' � -r—: 100 Foot Buffer Zone 0 ��D ° Har�Ony �roVe Bank --11 - Subjec�t to Flood ngLand ' ROaa Land Under Water (100-Year Flood Plain) eodies and Waterways Peabody EI.= 12' NGVD , ��L�� Salem EI.= I1' NGVD ��Ca,$Q[}�{ — g — Limit of 10-Yeaz Flood Plain ' ^ � Peabody El= 10' NGVD � "' -�^-- _ -. -,-,- �.-,..,- �;{ ��. � ', ��, ��: � .� �� `Nonh River :Caria( -1A- � ,,. �� ' � � '� � � � ' �� t'' �,� � Salem E1=9' NGVD „,, ' ..,_ _ �,_ ,� ,��..T.. ,,.., sai .u�.,� - - - - . ,,\ _µ�..��_ _ s, +-�-��- Approximate Limit of ' 3 ' _ , -� . , � / _ n tto Site Drive 100' BufierZone --� �TP 1 � . .... `� t,9..�., k._...,... , � , � - ...�. .., X. ,....�. ._, .R.w��,.� Bordering La d Subjec �q z'� � . .. ,, ; TP_3 �� _ 3B- Flooding Presumed �o �" """'�` Abandoned RR Slding ____- Significant[o the Protection to � ��'�. � •� ' • � � �_� , � + of Wildlife Habitat ,.- , s 4 `��,r.�.. ._..,, ,,,,r.� .' .....r.. . , Abandoned -�,' , �x Photograph Reference � ' RR Siding - � � 3 � ',� � � � �.� ` �� ,.:�.,.,;..... - (See Figure 3) � � .�,a.'�� • . � �E �': -.�, � . .. i �'t �s_ � � � i / �.q . C � \ t,.. �n � Paved Area o� � ,,,� `� `" t � � - f T ,2 . ~ � � � � � � 3 ' �� ",� ,��;, i v �TP-2 i F: O � � � y � _ �/_ � �- \� _11 ___ � ' / � � .i ..., l\ �—_--i1 �, . / �� .. 0� �� Z � � Gravel Surface � T,� '� � '„ j , i � i `"` „' ,� � ` ,� =.. �� . �;.. `' ,�9r N-. � �. Paved �-° �p '� . � � �. ,_' . �,a . Area � � ��Pe �.. , . .��..a�_....�_ x :; � �,� �y�i� � ' �`�r' :. ��S "� . � { �'` �� ,....�...c.�e r�,-.� .�F � i �, �, ...� .�., e� , J� , - �.��.�: � � , �, � `� � i > ' � � i� i-F` �' . ` _ ; ,r' CommerciaU ;� i "Olde South � \ Industrial ' an-i � � � Buildings � Burial Ground° � AEFiIAL . �''��, � � �= i� .: Residential . �, PHOTO �° � � �� . � ;,��;, � Building � . t' t �\ , -� � , � -� < � ' ' rv'`�r�,, Peabody � °,� � ;" � _,.✓'. .. Salem �%� � easton Street e� � Figure 2 � R` Ma�� St�e �� Wildlife Habitat Evaluation �� Residential c Study Area c Building � � � � j P.o° Peabody/Salem, MA 0 50 100 Feet � 1 1 ' . 1 �i��qf%��r�� { ^'r� � ` T �yf� i / V� y z (� � � � _,'. 'I�k}a�-�� 6° �l y: '. � ,� �� '� �� ,�i-�� . i� � �'� 4 s � yT�A, ��ih� » e� ,.y.�l � 1 .(1 � �.. ��1 �. } 1�'� '0\� � }t : � $ �i�(�]n J� ' µ � ^{� . . �� . � I ' {!I1 '. '�� +.�� ' � � / I, �/`/ > ' . � �. . . .f / ^ \.1 0 � ' . . � f V � V , . . . Y ".� V .. . . . ' \� / . \ � � . \ ia �;il, �k,}?'ti. -��a p-'r�in�i`.- , , \� . , C>' �\ �If \� _ . - � , , �� . � ' _ ' , :, i .; � ` � , � ��:� „� , , . -. . � . . . ., �, „� � � / yg� ..� +.*lH � �: �`� / 1 1� �.� � ,IY��V �'(l� � II��,�/,� �� t {� ' � ,i�fr, r• ,`�'' ,� s /,p � `r. ;' It ��y.�}irj f,�r �p :� s�x„ �i� 1rOY� ,/Y��yf LI , �$ 1� 7 � � s`,t l�(�I',� A 1�� Y t �� ' � `�I,y'�Pi ��y�� , ,.,r- ,y y (+'•1''��'�� s; �; E�� , � � i � � � ,;" n�� ,�1 �� !� ��i �� I �� ,a`� �'� •.�,1 � ° Q. � u ,�i.: '�� r., �' � 1 , �� -,. �� C i�' �; 4v � _ li � � . J1`- �� in s�� '�; d�� i ,a r . � I , ''� �. � � ,�, t , � � . _ � � %'� � . . .. ._ • �-. _ ,_ � '�; =�:. _ , `;� -� _ . �s� iP " .�� _ - . . � .. . - _ ;1�. •_ . ':.n' ' ... .. . . _ , . . - _ _ ''��' }. . t � � .. ' ' - .. . ' "��' . _ i.ti _ 1 •� 1 I• � 1 1� I . - 11 • I 1 • � , � . � � , , , r� � , , _ r' � � �� . - . �>�r � � _ . . .. . � , � � t !d� � . '� '1�.s�s _�, ' �fiy . �, ._'� .{�. �' � ...� � L �. ., s .. '� , . I S r � � r`g .` y ? + .. , �;i' r . �+y" t1 ..• �S.'� ` � t . r� :. � � � .. ` �y+i�° +� I , i , \ _ p b.r .�' . I .:., ,.. . _ . �� .. � , � � . �ci ;� ri�a� p. 1 :J t �� `%"" ` .:��{/�' ��!�� .. . ,� ` .; � /��,� ��rv/ �� .: �'qI r�"'� {" . .'J�: � �'�- , �' � �IG f'� •/ % �� ..Itia_ :1. j�� / �. I �' . ' � "��r �. � �; � 'f� �.g `��..r•s �..a' l� n�p .i #' � � �.. �� . ��I . (�� ff. � � s 4rfr y�"��k-ha-5u. �'�� b!{i r /`� ;,: � � � . - . � i �- ? . .. -. f�/,� : �� .+'� s 1��;�' i � ^" -� 0� � � �d _ +e. j . `9 '�.y,��,. ? �.1 ji' A�, ' .. , . ' *- ^+ �� e�� . ' a-✓» r %��I :,s u"`r v e� i ��. 1 `;.y � ` �4 L,_-` �. . :'�:.��w � ja,,�'` ♦��r �� r �,sy- � - 'f/'�4R B ,!� � ��'v ,.� � � ` . . b S\ � S �,d'yb' '. a� 1 `�c yri�3�� r"L.._T � °� ��'t /' �uo � ��:�� 4': � � � � -� �� (. J r �� w�`7- — ^ yir, "-`t�G'°�w.': ''C '��6�a ti � *� �' .' S t/fi�`, �h w� � . . .. " , F F � "",.�,,,..�;`�yp� .�. ' � � �'l�� Y � �� ' J •.a"a ., �k•''�r� a F �v .l° � k n( ` _' �� r � �� .' ,� t•'.t% � �. 1�:. L _ --4..��57• �� , � s `' � s"',,,„... . "�` t � ' �� .�-�,) � , 4 �. r au'�+'��.� "'�.+r ,<,µ„e ._ '� �`1�.� � �:i� .� . .,ca.Q : ., . RM �e�+:l.� V „^A;' . 1 )..' ~�Jf' � i.t:v�.,�� A�. \� : V ��—�-., �.. ':1 � 1�. . ��Y t��ti.e S i 'R '-- � � . t�i `-�,_Y` � � � � � � . � . � � � L: �,C �r I }£Y. � �I� / 4 �..;� r �f r�.� . i r 5�.;i �r{� A. .. *a'•'.r( . �--i�l �/a.Iv� ' �� `��I i .._�'��i ` 4 �t``Ic J . I 1 ...,^it Mse�l' . .�� F � i� 1i _ � ��•�. . �.r 1 . WF ,.�i ��.,' I .. . � l I �3�•` / y �� Y�y1�.�t�. . � � � � �� P��t�� .�.S�i � � � � ,:1 s� ,� +.-0 ':r t� v ��j1� y � �,'q1 � e��,`, � � � ' � c`,,t��'` i� `��' �,;:;�,�1,i �� y 5 = i ' �� ,�:• , � � • �� • . � . � . �. � — — 1 ' 1 , � 1 1 ' ' ' i 1 1 � 1 1 1 � SOILS LOGS ' v\w�03834�variousVocfly.doc � ' G2A GeoEnvirormentel, Inc. Boring No. G2•1 Enaineers/Scien�ists Narringfon Property Page 1 of 1 ' 320 Needham Street _ _ Neuton Upper Falls, Massachusetts 02164 Salem, Massachusetts File�No. 73772.1 (617> 969-0050 DJA ' Boring Co. G2A D�illinp, Ine. Casina Sa ter �Grourdwater Readirqe� Foreman Ri�hard Jaiea Type NSA Split Spoon Date Time Depth sirq Stab. Time GZA Rep. R. Tilley:ek I.D./O.D. 3.75"/6.0" 7.3"/2.5'� OS/13/93 0800 8.2 10' - , Date Start OS/13/93 Erd OS/11/93 xenmer Yt. 740p 05/73/93 0830 5.2 out Cmpletion Location See Exploration Lxation Plen Namer Fall 30" GS.EIev. Datun Other ' P S 8 S&iQte Infomiecion SaiQle Stretua R EQuipment Instelled T N Y Pm./ Depth Blows/ Ffeld Description 8 Classification Description K H G S No. Ree. (Ft.) 6" Test Data S Curb Box Cancrete S-7 24/71 0-2 74-73 ND Nediun dense btack, fine to eoarse 1. 0-0.5' ' SAND, sane(rS Silt, little Grovel. 16-19 _�,. ..,.: Bmtonite -s Seal :>::i<: �:M;i; 0.5-15� %:�' �?"; 2" PVC ' . ;;�; :�:.':' Riser 5 ��3� 2> ::?sr!:: S-2 24/7; 5-7 11-28 ND Top 11": Very dense, brown, fina to s�.�., S<.t. Filier coerse SAND sare Gravel, trece Silt. � . Sard 27-18 Bottan 2": Ve�y dense, rust, fine to SAND � �� 1.5-13' , mediun SAND, little Silt. �, c : �, 2" PVC : Wellscreen .�:<,. ::,;:: 3-13� �r: %x::: %:�': 'r•, � :.�i,�,;z ��s_i. 10 <::�^: �?�<?; S•3 24/10 10-12 71-19 ND Dense, broyn, fine to toarse SAND, '�;;; 79-20 trace(-) Silt. ?�� ;; 1 ,.,<. Boitan of Boring at 13'. 15 1 ' 20 ' ' 25 , , 1. Field testing readings represent total orgenic vapor levels, referenced to e benzene standerd, measured R in the headspace of �overed soil saiple jars using an NNu Modet PI-101, 10.2 eY photoionixation analyzer. e Results are tn parts per million (ppm), ND indicates nothing detetted. � m a ' r k s Stratification lines represmt approximece bourWaries bet�een soil types, transitions may be gradual. Yater leveL ' readings have bem made at iimes ard under tonditions stated. Fluctuations af groundwater mey occur due io faetors ather than those presmt at the time measuremencs �ere mede. goring No. C2-1 ' t -1 � J Harrington Property Boring No, �Z z I� 320 Needham Sireet Page 1 of 1 Newton Upper Fa(Ls, Massachusetis 02164 , (617) 969-0050 Salem, Massachusetts File No. 13172.1 Boring Co. G2A Dritli Chkd 8 ; DJA �9. Ine. Casin S ler Foremen -�— � ater Readin ' Rithard Jonea Type XSA Sptit Spoon Date GU Re T�� Depth Lasing Stab. Time i P. R. Tilley:ek I.D./O.D. 3.75"/6.0" 13"/2.5" OS/73/93 0915 7.0 10� Date Start OS/73/93 End OS/13/93 Ha�mer Yt. 1408 OS/73/93 0945 6.5 Out Campletion ' Location See Exploration Lxetion Vlan Nammer Fall n 30 GS.Etev. Detu� Other D C e Sanp(e Informetion P S L S�4�e Siratun R Equipment Installed , T N H Pen./ Depth Blows/ Field Deseriptim 8 LLasaifieetion Deseription K H G 5 No. Rec. (Ft.) 6" Test Deia S�� 6�7� U'13 21-24 ND ry S Curb eox Ve dense variegated, fine tp Conerete eoarae SAN6 same(•) Gravel, traee(.) �• 0-0.5' ' 100/4�� Silt, Cinder, Brick <FILU. ::;; Bentonite SAND (FILL) 'is Seal 3>:: 0.5-7.5 ' 2" PVC ' S : Nells�reen S-2 2G/74 5-7 � 0•10' 5'3 ND Top 5": toose, dark grey fine to 5.5� t � Filter 2'4 Bottane9„ANDMediu�estiffe1dark broyn > Sand to black SILT and CIAY. S��T � 1•5'12' � AND CIAY ; 10 70, ' S-3 24/24 10-72 10-7 ND Top 20u: Very stitf, olive CLAY erd ,.' SILT. CLAY 9"�� Bottam 4��; Very stiff, light 6rown, ��'S� c: Silty CLAT. SttTY CLAY ' Bottan of Borirg at 12'. � 15 1 ' 20 , � 25 � � 1. See Remark No. 1 on gorjng �og �Z-� , R e m a r k ' s 5[ratification lines represmt approzimate bwidariea betreen soil types, cransitiona mey be graduet, 4ater level readings have been mede at times and vWer tonditions stated. Fluetuetions of grandwa[er mey ocour due to fattors ' other than those present at the time measuremcnts were made. Boring No. GZ-2 , ' GU GEOENVIRONMENTAL, 1NC. GROJELT TEST PIT N0. TP-706 Enaineers/Stientists SHEET N0. T-OF—T— Harrin ton Gro rt FILE N0. �'S172 T , ea a em. eu amos ire CNKD. BY: �7� EHLAVATION EOUIPMENT G2A REG. R.7illev:mdn CONTRAC70R ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 WERA70R o n owe GRIXIND ELEV. � , NEA7XER Sumv. 60s lU1KE as TIME STARTED CADAC cu. . REACX �fY TIME LOMPIETED DEPTH SAMPIE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID EXCAV. Bd1lDER5: RENRRK N0. . READ(NG EfFORT COUNT/ N0. ' (ppn) CLA55 Dark bram, fine to medi�m SAND, trace Grevel and Silt and 1� Root8. ___________ M None 1. 7. ___—_ tz� M Nane S-1 Brorn, fine to coarse SAND and GNAVEL. ND M Nona 2. 3� 1 4' M None 3. �- Bottan of Tesc Pit at L�. 5' , 6� 7� ' g' 9' � 10' 1 "/ 12' ' 13, �(r , 15' 16� ' REMARKS: 1. Refer So Remerk No. 1 m Test Pit lop TG-100. ' 2�. C�oner�ete�yw,ap�l�l��plyxated et restern end of pit; wall rins north-south; scaped off soil on wall for ebout 20� 3. �ro�(d75te�oTise� ed et a out 3. 1 ' TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS PROGORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRq1NDVATER 12' LETTER SI2E RANGE USED f = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIfICRT10N M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED , 20��3� TRACE (TR.) 0 - 70X C = COARSE p 6° - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 18" - 36" IITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE i0 MEDIUM TINE i0 TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = fINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (50.) 20 - 35X GR = GRAY (NWRS) 4ATER BN = BROWN ' NORTH EI(CAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50% YEL = YEILOW Completion 3.5' VOLUME = 20.4 tu.yd E-----EASY M--•--MODERATE D•----DIfFICULT ' ' G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAI, INC. PROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-107 Enaineers/Scientists SHEET N0. T-6�f � Herrinqton Propertv FIIE N0. �3172T , ea a em. ew aims ire CHKD. 8T: -07� EXCAV�TION EWIVMENT GU REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRAC70R ENPRO DATE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n owe GRWND ELEV. �� ' YEA7HER Sunnv. 70s IUKE ase TIME ST�RTED —�SO� CAP�C cu. . REACN —�7�f TINE LOMPLETED �3r� DEPTH SAMPLE SOiI DESCRIPTION VID E%GV. BOULDERS: REWIRK ' N0. READING EfFORT LOUNT/ N0. (ppm) CIASS ND E Nane 7. II ' 1� 5-1 Brown ard black, fine to mediun SAND, sane Gravel, trace Silt. Z E None � 3� E None I , 3' S-2 150 E None 2. 4� Bro�n GRAYEL and fine to eoarse SAND. 5 5� E Nane 3. II ' / . Bottan of Test 7it at 5'. 6' ' 8� Ii ' 9� I 10� ' ", 72� ' 13' 14� ' 15' 16� ' REMARKS: 1. Refer to Remerk No. 1 on est Pit LOB TP•100. ' 2. strong odor at ebout 3'• arWyeter elao observed at 3. Ezoavetion caving in be�or fr.el 1 ' TEST PIT PLFN BOUIDER CLR55 PROVORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRWNDYATER b' LETTER SI2E RANGE USED F = fINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATfON LLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED ' �2' TRACE (TR.) - 0 - 70X C = LOARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTX 8 78" - 36" LITTLE (Ll.) 10 • 20X F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TINE TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/L = FINE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SqAE (SOJ 20 - 35X GR = GRAT (Xd1RS) HqTER BM = BROYN , NORTN EXGV�TION EFFORT AND 35 - 50X YEL = YELLOH ��etion 3' VOLUME = 2.2 cu.yd E•----EASY M•----MODERATE D-•---DIFFICULT 1 ' GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAI, INC. PROJECT 7EST 7IT N0. TP•108 Enaineers/Scientists SHEET N0. T—QF—T— Narrin ton Pro rt FILE N0. �3172T ' ea a em, eu amos ire CHKD. BY: �7A�'— E%LAVATION EOUIPNENT G2A REP. R.Tillev:mem CONT0.ACTOR ENPRO DAiE OS/OS/93 OPERATOR o n owe GROUND ELEV. , NEATHER Sumv. 70s IUKE ase TIME STARTED �LD� CAV�C cu. . REALN �fE TIME COMPLETED �LS— DEPTN SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIVTION PID EXCAV. 8p1LDER5: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. ' (ppm) LlASS Dark broun, fine to mediun SAND, same Gravel, trace Silt and S-1 1� Roote. _____ ND E None 1.,2. �i �_—��_��_ , S•2 ND D None � 2' Reddish-brorn, fine to coarse SAND ard GRAVEL, traee Silt. 3� D Nane , 3' ND None 3. 4' S-3 erown GRAVEL end COBBLES, sane fine to coarse Sand, trace 5� Silt. Nor+e ' � Bottan of Excavation at 5'. - 6' ' 71 II 8� 9� ' 70� i 1 "� I ,_- ' 13, 14� � �5 16' ' REMARKS: t. Refer to Remerk No. 7 m Test Git Lop TP-100. � 2. Concrete end rei forcemmt ber observed at 7' to 1.5'; it is unclear if toncrete is a wall or a slab, and m. ' 3. rounduater at .9'. , ' TEST 7IT GLAN BOULDER CLASS PROPORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRQINDWATER USED 70� LETTER SIZE RANGE F = FINE ( ) ENCp1NTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICAIION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCOUNTERED ' �'�4' TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10X C = COARSE A 6° • 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH 10' 8 18" - 36'� LIiTLE (LI.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO LOARSE READING GROUND• SOME (S0.) 20 • 35% GR = GRAt (HWRS) VATER BN = BROYN � NORTN EXCAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - 50X YEL = YELLOY Carpletion 2.9' VOLUME = 10.2 cu.yd E-----EASY M-----MODERATE D--•--DIFFiCULT 1 ' G2A GEOENVIRONMENTAI, INC. PROJECT TEST PfT N0. TP-109 ��. Enqineers/Scientists SHEET N0. TQFT Harrin ton Pro rt FILE N0. �3172T � ' ea a em, e� amos �re CNKO. BY: 37T- E%CAVATION EGUIPMENt GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRRCiOR ENPRO DATE OS/OS/9S � ODERATOR o n oue GRWNO ELEY. ' YEATHER Sv�m. 70a MqKE ase TIME STARTED �50� CA��L cu. . REACN �fF TIME COMPLETED �SZ� DEPTH SAMGLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID E%CAV. Bd1lDER5: REMARK N0. READING EFFORT CWNT/ N0. ' (ppm) CLASS I 0.5' Light brwn fine to eoarse SAND and GRIIVEL, irace Silt, Roota (FILLS ND E Nons 1. 1� � ' 1� AS�NIILT (2" thitk). , �. ND D None 2' S-7 Varigated Color, fine to Coerse SAND, same(-) Gravel, irate 2' (*) Silt, trace Cinders (FILL). ND D Nane � 3� 3� Blaek LINDERS, little fine to coarse Sand (FILL). None 4' S-2 Olive SitT, trece fine Santl. None 2. , 5� 5�3 I Bottan of Test Pit at 5'. 6� ' 8� 9� I, ' 'O, , "I 12� , 131 i 14' ' 15� 16' ' REMARKS: 1. �p�teuwrJ�.l{p.�f� Pit Lo9 TP•700. ' 2. Ground�St�F�served et &. ' ' TEST PIT PLAN BOULDER CLASS GROGORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRWNDYATER 7" LETTER SIZE R�NGE USED F = fINE (X) ENCWNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION M = MEDIUM ( ) NOT ENCWNTERED , �2" TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10X C = COARSE A 6" - 78" V = VERY ELAPSED DE7TM B 78" - 36" LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM iIME TO TO L 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND- SOME (S0.) 20 • 35X GR = GRAY (NOURS) NATER , BN = BRONN NORTH E%CAVATION EiFORT AND 35 - 50X YEL = YELLOY Crnpletion 3� VOLUME = 2.6 cu.yd E-----EASY N-----MODERATE D•-••-DIFFICULT ' ' GU GEOENVIRONMENT�I, INC. pROJECT TEST PIT N0. TG•110 Encineers/Scientists SHEET N0. —T"-OF"T � , N�arrin ton vrocertv PRE N0. —'I3172T —Pee�iodviTTem. ew aims i re CHKD. BY: �S�— EXCAVATION EOUIPMENT G2A REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRACTOR ENVRO DATE OS/OS/93 OVERATOR o n o�e GROUND ELEV. , YEATXER Sunnv. 70s MpKE ase T1ME STARTED �SLU— CAPAC cu. . REACH �ff TME CONPLETED 150�— DEPTN SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION PID E%CAV. Bd1LDER5: REMARK N0. READ(NG EFFORT COUNT/ N0. ' (ppm) CU1S5 7� Bram to blaek, fine to coarse SAND arxl GRAVEL, trece Silt 1. 2. S-1 ard Roota. ND Mone 3.;4. 1� ' Bottan of Test Pit at 6". . 2' 3' ' 4� 5� , 6' ' 7� 8' , ' 9, 10� II , "/ 12' ' 13, 74� ' 15' 16� ' REMARKS: 7. Refer to Remerk No. 1 on Teat Pit Lop TP-700. ' 2. Sheen observed in grardrater surfece. . 3• � "• Test Pit. 4. Grourdyeter observed eS � be ow grwid surfac __�r-. ' ' TEST GIT PLAN Bd1LDER C1115S PROFORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GRWNDYATER USED 2' LETTER S12E RANGE F = fINE (%) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION LLASSIFICATION N = ME�IUM ( ) NOT ENCWNTERED ' �Z' TRACE (TR.) 0 • 10X C = COARSE A b" - 18^ V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH B 78" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE TO MED[UM TIME TO TO C 36" �ND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READING GRWND- SOME (S0.) 20 • 35X GR = GRAY (HWRS) WATER BN = BROYN ' NORTN E%CAVATION EFFORT AND 35 - SOX YEL = YELLOY CaiQletion 3° VOLUME = 2 tu.ft E---••EASY M•----MOOERATE 0•---•DIFFICULT ' ' GZA.GEOENVINONMENiAL, [NC. VROJECT TEST PIT N0. TP-118 Enqineers/Stientists SHEET N0. T-0�� Harrin ton Pro rt fllE N0. —13772T ' ea a em, eu amos ire CNKD. BY: '37�— E%CAVATION EOUIPMENT GZA REP. R.Tillev:mem CONTRACTOR ENPRO OATE OS/O6/93 OPERATOR eor e ic r GROUND ELEV. , YEATNER Vartiv Surmv. 60s MRKE ase TIME STARTED �ZL� CAPAC cu. . REACH —T7—ff TIME COMiLETED �31�— DEPTH SAMPLE SOIL DESC0.IVTION PID EXCAV. BOULDERS: REMARK N0. REPM�IIN� EFFORT CWSS N0. ' S-1 0.5' Black, fine to mediun SANO, sane Silt, little Roots. 1' S•2 Black, fine to eoarse SAND, traee Silt. ND 7. ' 7.5� ND 2� Reddish-brown, fine to coerse SAND erd GRAVEL, trace(+) Silt. 2.,3. ' 3, S-3 ` ND Bottan of Test Pii at 4'. ' S' 6� ' 71 8' , 9� 10' , ", I 12' ' 131 14' ' 15� 16' ' REMARKS: 7. fer to emerc No. on � t Pit Log TP-100. i ' 2. rourduater observed at 2.5 3. ' ' TEST PIT PLAN Bq1LDER CLA55 PR070RTIONS ABBREVIFTIONS GROUNDVATER USED 7� LE7TER SIZE RANGE F = FINE ( ) ENCOUNTERED ' DESIGNATION CLRSSIFICATION M = MEDIUN (X) NOT ENCWNTERED �2' TRACE (TR.) 0 - 10X C = COARSE A 6" - 18" V = VERY ELAPSED DEPTH 8 18" - 36" LITTLE (LI.) 10 • 20X F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND IARGER F/C = F[NE TO COARSE READING GROUND- SOME (50.) 20 • 35X CR = GRRT (HWRS) HATER BN = BROWM ' NORTN EXCAY�TION EfFORT AND 35 - SOX YEL = YELLW VOIUME _ _tu.yd E-•---EASY Crnpletion 2.5� M-----MODERATE D-•---D1FFILULT 1 � ' GU GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT TES7 VIT N0. TG-119 �I En9ineers/Scientists SXEET N0. —T—O�� Narrin ton Pro rt FIIE N0. �3172T , ea a em, ew aims ire CHKD. BY: �— � EXCAVAT(ON EOUIPMENT � GiA REP. R.iillev:mem CONTRALTOR ENDRO DATE OS/O6/93 'i OVERATOR eor e ic r GRdJND ELEV. �� WEATHER Pertiv Sumv, 60a CpK�E ase REACX —�ff T�ME STARTED �33� I �I ' AC cu. . TIME LOMPLETED �LZ�— il DEPTN SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION P(0 E%CAV. BOULDERS: REMARK ' N0. READING EFFORT COUNT/ N0. I'' , cPpn� c�ass � Black to dark brown, fine to coarse SAND, sane Silt, treee ND E 14A 1. 1' S-1 Roots and Gravel. ' 7.5' E 1-2A 2' 3 Brown, fine to eoarse SAND, sane Gravel, tre�e Silt. ND E 7-U 3� 5-2 I , `� E None 5 Brown, fine to mediun SAND, trace Silt. None ' / Nwx 6' 6.5' 5-7A T ' 8� None ND Nona ' 9� S-9 Bra�rt�, fine to toaree SAND and GRAYEL, trace Silt (nunerous I Cobbles). 10� Nane 1 "i None 2..3. 72' Bottan of Test Pit at 11.5'. ' 13' 14� ' 15� 76' ' REMARKS: i. Refer to Remerk No. 7 m Teat 7it Log TP-700.__- ' 2. o 3. rountlwater observe en en�Lhe test pit et 17' ' ' 7E5T 71T 7lAN BOULDER CLASS 7ROGORTIONS ABBREVIATIONS GROUNDWATE0. USED 8' IETTER SI2E RANGE F = FINE (X) ENCOUNTERED DESIGNATION CLASSIFICqT10N � M = MEDIUM O NOT ENCOUNTERED , �2' TRALE (TR.) . 0 - 10% C = COARSE A 6" • 18" V = VERY ELA7SED DEPTH B 18" - 36" LITTLE (L1.) 10 - 20X F/M = FINE TO MEDIUM TIME TO TO C 36" AND LARGER F/C = FINE TO COARSE READtNG GRWND- � SOME (50.) 20 • 35X GR = GRAY (HOURS) WATER BN = BROYN t NORTN EXGVATION EFFORT AND 35 • 50X YEL = YELLOY Completion 11� VOLUME = cu.yd E•••-•EAST - M----•MOOERATE D-•••-DiFFICULT '