333 BRIDGE STREET - BUILDING JACKET . r• 333 BRIDGE STREET ,
IA
1
(gitg Of SaiM, R."
OCTOBER 26, 1978 _
CIT't ClLl VJ ui=FICE
SALEM. MASS.
DECISION ON PETITION SUBMITTED BY ED MORNEAU CONCERNING PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 333 BRIDGE ST. (OWNER, DEBORAH WETMDRE)
A hearing on this petition was held on October 26, 1978 with the following members
of the Board present: Jane T. Lundregan; Donald Eames, Arthur Labrecque, Douglas Hopper,
James Boulger and Alternate Member, John Nutting. Notices were sent postpaid to abutters
and others and duly published in the Salem Evening News on October 12, and 19, 1978 in
accordance with Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808.
Atty. John Serafini represented the Petitioner before the Board. The property is
located in an R-2 District. The Petitioner is a Lessee of a gas station at 333 Bridge
St. under written lease. The gas station has been in existence on the premises for at
least thirty years. The Board of Appeal granted a variance in 1952 in order to permit
the rear portion of the premises as a parking lot for private and commercial vehicles.
The Petitioners would like to use the premises for the sale of used cars. The Petitioner
stated that the particular use would not involve any more than six cars at any one time.
The Petitioner noted that the neighborhood is primarily. industrial and commercial.
• The Board voted to grant the Special Permit requested for the extension of a non-
conforming use in order to allow the Petitioner to sell no more than six cars at any
one time and on the condition that the Special Permit shall be limited to three years,
at which time the matter will be reviewed by the Board for renewal.
The Board found that the neighborhood is primarily commercial and that it could
grant the permit requested without substantial detriment to the neighborhood and without
derogating from the intent of the Salem Zoning By-law.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
Nj
!Jane T. Lundregan /
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. VSecretary
GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. -
PURSANT TO '.*.ASS. GENERAL LA,,S, CHAPTER 808. SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PEP.LHT
GRANTED HEREIN, SHALL NOT TARE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION. BEARING THE CERT• -
FiCATION OF THE CITY LLERB THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN, FILED.
OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE, THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS;:IISSED OR DENIED IS -
RECORDED IN THE SOU:FI ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
•
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
=` (t it of "Salem, 49ttssar4usetts.
.. � � C RE:E:IV(_p
`= s Puxrb of JAM ZB 3 01 PH '81
DECISION ON THE PETITION_OF_J_OSEPH & EDMOND MORNEAU FOR A CITY LLr-n, -Z) UtFICE
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 333.BRIDGE STS SALEM, MASS.
A hearing on this petition was held January 14, 1987 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming rear setback
and use to allow construction of an addition in this R-2 district.
`sA The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
i
Notwithstanding anything to .the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board
of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in
Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion
of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more -
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
- - - safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.- -
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The current use of the property as a gas station has
existing for over twenty five (25) years;
2. The proposed addition to the building will increase the tax base;
3. Increase in the building will improve services offered to the
citizens of Salem.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed addition will promote the public health, safety,
: . - convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants;
2. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district oP the purpose of the
Ordinance.
f
gyp` • w
= w:W DECISIONON THE PETITION OF JOSEPH & EDMOND MORNEAU FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 333 BRIDGE ST. , SALEM,
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one (4-1 ) , Mr. Bencal voted
present, to grant the Special Permit requested subject to the following conditions:
1 . Plans are to be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit;
2. All construction conform to Massachusetts State Building Code,
the Salem Fire Prevention Code, City Ordinances, and Massachusetts
General Laws relative to fire safety;
s��s•vr. ;: I
v , 3. The proposed addition is to be used as auto repair only;
.N. 4. The addition to be constructed of the same material as the
existing building and be painted as to blend in aaith the
existing structure. '
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
es B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS'BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
-' APPEAL FP.Oh. THIS DECISIOi,, I uT,,L
GENERAL LP.�S. Ci,:.FTER E1' P' ..';'i TO F;'i. .. 17 CF -ur
OF TH.S DE-'SI011 li. J: FIJ:+S
GR, HEREM, SH.1L
_ FICU.'-- ; OF THE 6!- . .
OR Tn„ :F SDC+ ! � .' . . li=. ' -; Fl-'ED,
RECSP I:i 7NE S IS
OF RE,- OP,'IS , : x,'02.. ;. , ;.- " 'HE i:.� u" THE OWNER
' _Z"iFICATE OF TITLE.
r.
BOARD OF APPEAL
u •
. ra
Ctu of "ittlem, C49ttspr4psr5ttsoH 'P.1
PoxrD of "41LE *
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STANLEY TARNOWSKI (PE�ITTONER) , JOSEPH
AND EDMOND MORNEAU (OWNERS) FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR;ia3 BBRIDGE ST.r(!R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held January 14, 1987 and continued until
January 21 , 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman;
Richard Bencal, Secretary; Messrs. , Luzinski, Strout and Fleming. Notice of the
hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the rental of limousines
in this R-2 zone.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for
alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures,a nd for changes,
enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures and
uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use
to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit request,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing,makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There are other businesses in the immediate area;
2. Both support and opposition to the plan was presented.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed business will not be substantially more detrimental
to the neighborhood;
t
2. The proposed business will promote the convenience and welfare of
the City's inhabitants.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STANLEY TARNOWSKI (PETITIONER) , JOSEPH AND EDMOND
MORNEAU (OWNERS) FOR 333 BRIDGE ST. , SALEM;
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit to allow rental of limousines, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner and/or Bridge St. Amoco has right to use the rear
parcel described as a parking lot at 333 Bridge St. ;
2. That continued licenses be obtained from the Salem Licensing Board
and the Salem City Council;
3. All regulations of the Salem Fire Dept. , relative to fire safety
be strictly adhered to;
4. Any and all permits be obtained for operation of said business;
5. No more than two (2) limousines be parked on the front or
rear lot overnight.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
Richard A. Bencal, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Tn
a- CSA 5 i 7'.
r
0, t i r SEC Ir
C-1
r F �7Ehi
- CFF 'rc: UH S P BGFF7 DF N