313 BRIDGE STREET - BUILDING JACKET (tiE
313, BRIDGE STREET x,
td1Tt J Of ,ialM, &ffitt85UChU9C1t5
,. Poarb of �PPP�[ At'� �y it oo AH '67
JJ 4t''W FL Lit'
CITY
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOSEPH E. GRIFFIN JR. (PETITIONERTA) EM' HAS$,
EDWARD W. WOLKIEWICZ (OWNER) FOR A VARIANCE FORJ313 BRIDGE ST. (R-2)
t
A hearing on this petition was held March 18, 1987 and continued to April 15,
1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. ,
Fleming, Luzinski, Strout and Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published
in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance or Special Permit to alloy: building
which is currently being used as an auto repair shop to be used as an auto
body shop. Said property is located an an R-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable .relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . A Variance, not a Special Permit, is required;
2. Odors and toxic fumes could adversely affect the neighborhood
and the health of it's inhabitants;
3. This is a very dense, older neighborhood with many wooden structures;
4. There was major neighborhood opposition;
5. Petitioner did not meet his burden of proof with regards to
legal hardship.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject
property and not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would not involve substantial
hardship to the petitioner;
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOSEPH E. GRIFFIN JR. (PETITIONER) ,
ED'W'ARD W. WOLKIEWICZ (OWNER) FOR A VARIANCE FOR 313 BRIDGE ST. (R-2)
page two
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, 4-1 , against the granting
of the requested Variance. Mr. Luzinski voted present.
VARIANCE DENIED
aures B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FRO!,: THIS DPCISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAl7S, CHAFER 808. AND Sii'.LL B- FdLb t4!THIN 2C DAY'S AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
-P T;nS DECISION IN THE OFFICE TEE CITY CLERK.
P iO 1 tip, r .:.5;.,i EA:15 r S, SFC;Uf. ll THE 1. r1i;CE GF SP`Th- 1T
,ERT-
SH-11 NIT A.Y._ -
FICA'. Oi; OF THE CITY CLERK THAT :i° EIAPSEp F.'iUhOR
Is
OP, THAT, IF SU'"H !:N APPE?.L HR:; `: .. �H;•I IT 5'�S "cEEN Dla,'SR THE Jot :J OF THE 017NER
HE cI :".£DS AND Ii;DEY.ED
RECORCED IN THE _COR ESSEX i..
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND lrl_ OYJ.:ER'S CERTIFICATE Of TITLE.
BOARD OF APFEAL
Tity of 3ttleut, lttsottc usetts
"'q UP artment of Public 1$er11ICPS
(9ne tmletn Green
745-9595 Ext. 321
CHARLES F. GUIGLEY
City Engineer
Director of Public Services
July 12, 1996
w
Peter Glentadakes
313 Bridge Street
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Account#008796
Dear Mr. Glentadakes
During our visit to your premises on July 9, the meter reader identified a water wasting toilet leak. This
leak was no doubt the cause of the extraordinary high water bills you have been receiving.
Following our inspection I met with Director of Public Works Charles Quigley and recommended that
before we impose a fine and shut the water off for violations of city ordinances, you be given the
opportunity to pay off, in frill, all past due FY 95 and FY 96 water and sewer bills, along with
accumulated interest charges.
Mr. Quigley agreed to waive the fine for this tampering violation providing all past due amounts for water
and sewer are paid off by Judy 31, 1996.
The City Collector's Office can provide you with accurate information on the amount owed. If payments
for the past due amounts are not paid by July 31, the maximum fine($500.00)will be levied, water
service will be suspended and the Fire,Health and Building inspectors will be so notified.
S' rc ,
C er Kent
Water Registrar/Business Manager
cc: H. Jiadosz,C.F. Quigley, R Ledo L. Tremblay, . LaPointe,J. Scott,D. Charente
�� i