Loading...
293 BRIDGE STREET - BUILDING JACKET r + CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUS BOARD OF APPEAL 31 Ph �tTy 3S 120 WASHINGTON STREET I SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 SA L L M, IE s�1 KJMBERLEYDR1scoLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 MA S MAYOR May 31, 2017 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals A public hearing for all persons interested in the petition of 295 BRIDGE STREET ASSOCIATES, requesting a Special Permit to Sec. 3.3.3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, Nonconforming Structures, to allow the petitioner to extend a nonconforming structure, and a Variance to Sec. 5.1.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, Parking Design, to exceed the maximum width of entrance and exit drives at 293 BRIDGE STREET and 297 BRIDGE STREET (Map 26,Lots 634, 635)(B-4 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on April 19, 2017 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 5 11 and continued to May 17, 2017 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chau),Tom Watkins,Mike Duffy,Jimmy Tsitsinos, and Paul Viccica (alternate). The petitioner is seeking a Special Permit per Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, Nonconforming Structures, to allow the petitioner to extend a nonconforming structure, and a Variance to Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to exceed the maximum width of entrance and exit drives. Statements of fact: 1. Attorney Joseph Correnti and Attorney Kristin Kolick,representing 295 Bridge Street Associates. The project team also includes: Andrew McBeth, Contractor, Greenleaf Construction; Mark McLeod, Project Engineer, H.L. Turner Group Inc.;Andrew Loverud, Project Architect, Design Science; Bob Matvichuk, F.W.WEBB Salem Store Manager. 2. The City of Salem is also a co-applicant as the City is the owner of 297 Bridge Street, which lot is under agreement with F.W. WEBB. 3. In the petition date-stamped March 29, 2017, the petitioner requested a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures, to allow the petitioner to extend an existing non-conforming structure and a Variance per Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, to exceed the maximum width of entrance and exit drives. 4. 293 Bridge Street and 297 Bridge Street were rezoned to the B-4 Zoning District. The parcels were previously within the NRCC zoning district. 5. The current use of the building is classified as Industrial wholesale,warehouse or distribution facility, and sale and storage of building supplies, and retail store, except department store, not elsewhere set forth. These uses are by right under the B-4 Zoning District. 6. The proposed project includes the use of two (2) separate lots, including the City of Salem municipal parking lot and existing F.W. WEBB site. The municipal parking lot is currently under agreement per a public auction conducted on November 14, 2016, at which F.W. Webb or nominee was the low bidder, as set forth in a Memorandum of Sale of even date. City of Salem Board of Appeals May 31,2017 Project:293-297 Bridge Street Page 2 of 7 7. The petitioner is requesting a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures, at the property of 293 Bridge Street, to allow the petitioner to extend a nonconforming structure. The petitioner is proposing a 7,600 +/- square foot single story addition and associated five-story stairway to the existing structure. 8. The existing F.W. WEBB building is non-conforming as to the height and rear yard setback. The proposed addition does not exceed the existing non-conforming dimensions. Five-story stairwell does not exceed the height of the existing non-conforming structure and the proposed one-story showroom does not exceed the existing rear yard setback non-conformity. 9. The petitioner was originally proposing a 40,000 +/- square foot freestanding structure on the municipal parking lot at 297 Bridge Street. This proposal was met with significant neighborhood opposition. The petitioner then proposed a 16,000 +/- square foot two (2) story showroom on the 293 Bridge Street lot,which was also met with significant opposition. The proposal before the Zoning Board of Appeals is a significant compromise consisting of a one-story 7,600 +/- square foot addition at 293 Bridge Street. 10. The proposed addition is a one-story brick structure that will be used as a showroom and retail space for F.W. WEBB. The front fagade has ribbon storefront windows and the brick is proposed to compliment the existing historic brick as much as possible. 11. F.W. WEBB has been located at the property for over a half century and would like to upgrade the business to include a bed and bath showroom in the proposed expansion. The proposal will keep F.W. WEBB in the City of Salem and increase employment and tax revenue to the City. 12. The petitioner is also requesting a Variance per Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, to exceed the maximum width of entrance and exit drives. 13. The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of 30' feet of width for curbcuts in business and industrial districts. 14. In the original petition, the applicant proposed a 35' foot wide curbcut at western most entrance, 67' wide cutbcut at the center entrance and 53'wide curbcut at the eastern most entrance. 15. At the request of the Board at the April 19,2017 meeting, the petitioner amended the plans to include safer pedestrian access across the proposed 67'wide curbcut. 16. The amended plans included a reduction of curbcut width such that the most eastern and western curbcuts comply with the zoning ordinance dimensional requirements. The curvature of the western most driveway was reconfigured to be 30' feet wide and also provide adequate access for tractor- trailers ractortrailers to exit the property. 17. The petitioner is now requesting a Variance per Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, only for the proposed 67' foot wide curbcut. 18. The plan for the 67' foot wide curbcut was amended to include a sidewalk setback onto the parking lot area such that the pedestrian crossing width was reduced from 67' feet to 57' feet. 19. There are many pedestrians who use the existing sidewalk in front the property to access the commuter rail train station. City of Salem Board of Appeals May 31,2017 Project: 293-297 Bridge Street Page 3 of 7 20. Mark McLeod, project engineer, H.L. Turner Group Inc. Concord, NH presents associated traffic circulation patterns. The existing loading docks for F.W. WEBB are on the east side of the building. Currently, when deliveries are made from the west, drivers pass the site and then cross over both traffic lanes on Bridge Street to back onto the site. 21. The existing F.W. WEBB parking lot is shared with visitor and employee parking, deliveries and exterior storage. The proposed plan will improve safety on Bridge Street and on-site circulation and safety. 22. The existing driveway opening at the F.W. WEBB property is approximately +/- 90 feet wide, which the petitioner is proposing to narrow to a 28' wide curbcut and provide two (2) parking spaces in front of the proposed showroom/retail space, as shown on the approved plans herein. 23. The existing driveway opening at the municipal parking lot (297 Bridge Street) has a single +/- 30' wide curbcut. The petitioner is proposing two (2) curbcuts including a 30' foot wide curbcut and a 67' wide curbcut. 24. At the April 17, 2017 meeting, Mr. McLeod presented plans with circulation patterns to demonstrate that the 67' wide curbcut opening is necessary to provide an adequate turning radius for tractor- trailers to access the parking lot from the east and west direction. The curbcut also allows drivers to maneuver the tractor-trailers on site in a safe circulation pattern. 25. At the April 17, 2017 meeting, the Board requested that the petitioner look at other curbcut arrangements, including two (2) driveways to allow tractor-trailer traffic onto the site in order to reduce the 67'wide curbcut width proposed. Mr. McLeod was concerned that the circulation pattern required by the tractor-trailers would require multiple turning movements to back into the loading dock. Having multiple turning movements on the site is difficult for truck drivers and creates hazardous circulation conditions in a shared lot with employee and customer parking. Further,two (2) driveways to allow tractor-trailer traffic would require one (1) 40' wide curbcut and one (1) 50' wide curbcut,which would require two (2) variances rather than the one (1) variance requested. 26. A single 67' wide entrance-point, closer to the F.W. WEBB building, makes it clearer to truck drivers to enter at this location. The width of the curbcut allows tractor trailers to enter the site from the east and west bound directions and the curvature of the opening allows for smooth tractor trailer circulation to back into the proposed loading docks without having to make multiple on-site turning movements. The 30' foot driveway to the west will be used by tractor-trailers to exit the site. 27. The literal enforcement to allow only 30' foot curbcut widths would prohibit tractor-trailer trucks from entering the site in a safe manner. A result of the literal enforcement of Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, would cause on street loading on Bridge Street 28. At the May 17, 2017 meeting, the Board requested that the petitioner consider additional measures to provide safer pedestrian access across the 67' wide curbcut. The Board requested that the petitioner install a rumble strip or raised pavers to visually narrow the opening such that tractor-trailers could drive over the material, cars could drive in-between, and pedestrians could feel safe crossing the driveway because the change in materials would visually shorten the perceived distance of the curbcut opening. City of Salem Board of Appeals May 31,2017 Project:293-297 Bridge Street Page 4 of 7 29. The petitioner proposed cast concrete sidewalks on either end of the property, with a stretch of asphalt along the existing parking lot frontage. The Board requested that the sidewalk be concrete across the entire length of the property frontage. 30. The petitioner is proposing a 9,000 square foot fenced in outdoor product storage location along the rear of parking lot There is currently outdoor product storage where the one-story addition is proposed. 31. At the April 17,2017 meeting, the Board requested that the applicant provide a lighting plan. 32. At the May 17,2017 meeting, the petitioner presented a lighting plan and showed that there will be no light spill over onto adjacent properties. 33. The Board requested that the dumpster shown at the rear property line be moved to a more central location on site to be less obtrusive to the neighborhood. The Board requested that the dumpster be enclosed within the proposed outdoor storage area or a separate enclosure just outside of the outdoor storage area. 34. The Board recognized that the major concern of neighbors is that this project is not subject to Planning Board site plan review. The proposed addition is less than 10,000 gross square feet of new construction, which is the threshold for triggering Site Plan Review of non-residential structures by the Planning Board. 35. On May 17, 2017, the Building Commissioner provided a statement to confirm the interpretation that the 10,000 square foot threshold for triggering Site Plan Review is only triggered by the square footage of new building construction. 36. The Zoning Board, under the criteria of the requested special permit, has reviewed the typical site plan review items including a lighting, dumpster location, fencing, and landscaping to the extent that the Zoning Board could reasonably review these features. 37. This petition is under review by the Salem Conservation Commission and will also be reviewed by the Planning Board for a Floor Hazard Overlay District Special Permit only. 38. The requested relief,if granted,would allow the petitioner to extend a nonconforming structure,and exceed the maximum width of entrance and exit drives. 39. At the public hearing no members of the public spoke in favor of, and nine (9) in opposition to, the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Special Permit: The Board finds that the proposed extension of the nonconforming structure is not substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the neighborhood. 1. Social, economic and community needs are served by the proposal. City of Salem Board of Appeals May 31,2017 Project:293-297 Bridge Street Page 5 of 7 2. Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading are adequate. 3. Adequacy of utilities and other public services will not be negatively impacted. 4. Impacts on the natural environment, including drainage will be subject to review by the Conservation Commission. 5. The proposal fits with the character of the neighborhood. The F.W. WEBB industrial wholesale, warehouse and distribution and sale and storage of building supplies and associated parking lot are both existing uses. The proposed addition is located away from the Federal Street residences as much as possible. The proposed expansion fits with the architectural character of the existing historic structure. 6. Potential fiscal impact is positive. The proposed expansion will allow F.B. WEBB to continue to operate and expand employment in the City of Salem by modernizing the existing internal function of this historic building and provide a showroom and retail space for customers. Findings for Variance: 1. The lot shape and size are unique to the district, such that the literal enforcement to allow only a 30' foot curbcut width would prohibit tractor-trailer trucks from entering the site. 2. The hardship of literal enforcement of Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, is that a 30'wide curbcut width would cause on street loading on Bridge Street, which would create a traffic and unsafe public conditions. The petitioner demonstrated that the proposed 67' wide curbcut is necessary to create the turning radiuses for trucks to enter into the parking lot and safely maneuver on site to the loading docks rather than load and unload on Bridge Street. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without denigrating from the ordinance and without substantial detriment to the public good. The Board has taken care to consider and request traffic calming measures to mitigate pedestrian access and safety across the 67'wide curbcut. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings,the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Rebecca Curran (Chau), Tom Watkins, Mike Duffy,Jimmy Tsitsmos, and Paul Viccica (alternate)) and none (0) opposed, to grant a Special Permit to Sec. 3.3.3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance,Nonconforming Structures,to allow the petitioner to extend a nonconforming structure, and a Variance to Sec. 5.1.5 Parking Design, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to exceed the maximum width of entrance and exit drives, subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: Standard Conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. City of Salem Board of Appeals May 31,2017 Project:293-297 Bridge Street Page 6 of 7 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to the Planning Board. Special Conditions: Hours of Operation: 1. The hours of operation shall be Monday through Wednesday and Friday 6:30am to 5pm.Thursday 6:30am-8pm. Saturday 7am to 12pm. Sunday-Showroom only within the hours of 10am-3pm.,with no operation of loading and service counter on Sunday. Traffic and Pedestrian Access: 2. The petitioner has accepted a voluntary condition to install poured concrete sidewalks along the entire length of the properties. 3. The petitioner shall submit a revised site plan indicating proposed rumble strips and/or textured materials to provide a safe pedestrian crossing,while maintaining access for tractor-trailers and passenger vehicles.The plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Lighting: 1. The parking lot lighting shall be controlled such that lighting shall be reduced one hour after closing time. Full lighting shall be turned on no earlier than a half hour before opening time. 2. Elevation plans of the new addition showing lighting fixture locations and cut sheets of lighting fixtures shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant shall propose lighting fixtures that are in accordance with the submitted lighting plan. Landscaping and Maintenance: 3. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the Department of Planning and Community Development staff planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. To the extent allowed under the existing AUL and applicable laws, the applicant shall install plantings and screening along the rear perimeter of the properties that abut the Federal Street residences to provide year round screening,including evergreens,between the Federal Street residences and 293- 297 Bridge Street properties. 5. The applicant,owner,or assigns shall maintain the landscaping along the rear perimeter of the properties in perpetuity. Dumpster and Outdoor Storage Area: 6. The petitioner shall move the dumpster location to be adjacent to the outdoor storage location within an enclosure as to screen the dumpster in accordance with the dumpster ordinance. City of Salem Board of Appeals May 31,2017 Project: 293-297 Bridge Street Page 7 of 7 7. The chain link fence surrounding the outdoor storage area shall include slats or screening as reviewed and approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal fmm this demion,if any, shall be made pursuant to Seaton 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed=thin 20 days of fik'ng of this decision in the office of the City Cerk Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the I/arionce or Special Permltgranted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has peen filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. HM III 20 Powder Mill Road Maynard,MA 01754 Ph:(978) 461-0330 JM COtn.L, INC. Fax:(978)461.0275 BaiWng Ymn,VL Letter of Transmittal To: Tom St.Pierre Transmittal#: 22 City of Salem,MA - Date: 7/9/2012 120 Washington St Job: 11JMC577 FWW Salem Wall Repairs#2 Salem,MA 01970 Ph:(603)623-7271 Fax:(617)246.1426 Subject Project Closeout Package WE ARE SENDING YOU FJ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via None the following items: Q Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples 171 Copy of letter ❑ Change order G Specifications G Other Document Type Copies Date No. Description Other 1 7/2/12 Post Construction Structural Affidavit Other 1 5/15/12 SKR1 Other 1 5/10/12 SK2 Other 1 5/9/12 Field Observation Report#1 from H.LTurner Other 1 5/14/12 Field Observation Report#2 from H.L Turner Other 1 6/14/12 1 Field Observation Report#3 from H.L Turner Other 1 6/28/12 Field Observation Report#4 from H.L Turner Other 1 Permit#770-12 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: G For approval r Approved as submitted r Resubmit_copies for approval <J For your use ❑ Approved as noted G Submit_copies for distribution r As requested ❑ Returned for corrections G Return_corrected prints r For review and comment ❑ Other r FOR BIDS DUE G PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Remarks: Tom, Please feel free to contact Dave Simmons(978)290-0248 or Marc Moschella(978)793-1348 with any questions. Copy To: Marc Moschella(J.M.Coull, Inc.),Dave Simmons(J.M.Coull, Inc.) From: Jami Anderson(J.M.Coull,Inc.) Signature 1f enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. Page 1 of 1 POST CONSTRUCTION AFFIDAVIT DOCUMENT Date: July 2, 2012 Project Title: F.W.Webb - East Wall Structural Repairs Project Location: 295 Bridge Street Salem, Massachusetts Scope of Project: Reconstruction of the east wall of the building from the fourth floor window head to the roof. In accordance with Section 116.0-116.2.4 of the 8t" Edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code: I, Paul M. Becht, P.E., Mass. Reg. #36059, being a registered, Professional Engineer herby certify that,for the above named project, I have: 1. Reviewed the shop drawings, samples, and other submittals of the Contractor, as required by the construction contract documents, for the conformance to the design concept. 2. Reviewed and approved of the quality control procedures for all code required controlled materials. 3. Made periodic visits to the site, at appropriate stages of construction,to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to insure that the work was being performed in a manner consistent with the construction documents. 4. Submitted to the Construction Supervisor written field reports for each site visit summarizing the status of the work and outlining any issues discussed on-site during the visit. Signature Seal: o PAUL M. BECHT STRUcrURAL No. 35059 .. Paul M. Becht, P.E. o 7�Z�z POFFs EC/STER�G��`�Q SIGNAL EN 1 Post Construction Affidavircloc TURIJER 3081 GROuv THE H.L. TURNER GROUP Inc. 6"RUBBER STRIP RUBBER ��`\N OF GLUED DOWN MEMBRANE �+9 PAUL M. y� B CHT FLASHING ,r STERE `Q FSSIONAL x12"Ig' EMBED 6"INTO CMU @ 4'-0"O.C. CUT ROD FLUSH& COUNTERSINK NUT 2 x 8 WOOD BLOCKING existing wood roof decking SOLID WOOD CMU STRETCHER BLOCKING COURSE(CONT.) FLUSH COURSES 4+ a 6 x 10 @ V-0"o.c.(e) COURSES (CUT FLUSH wl INSIDE FACE OF MASONRY (3)ST PPED COURSES HARDWOOD SHIM (2)-SIMPSONY4"x 4Y2" TYP�1/2"STEP �/ SDS SCREWS @ 3"O.C. / L 6 x 6 x Yz'x V-8"Ig. wl(3)Y2"HILTI HIT 150 MAX ADHESIVE ANCHORS / SPACED @8 O.C. / EMBED.=4 Yz" '( il CMU BOND BEAM w/(2)-#4's CONT. I) JL(2)-4 x 3 Y2 x Y4 STEEL LINTEL OVER 5th FLOOR WINDOW h TOP OF 5th FLOOR WINDOW THE H.L. TURNER GROUP Inc. JM C 0 U LL, RONUBPR INC.I ALT. BEAM FIGURE NA� "x "s FWWEBB o".""."NMA�E -" . " "x cM„s SUPPORTAT SK: R1 H COMPANY coxcoeo. x vSwec onoi CMU WALL PHONE.(,aw,.l, v SALEM SCALE: coxcoeo IN xnearsuc o. uc K MASSACHUSETTS PROJ.NUMBER: 3081 DATE: 05/15/2012 A5-15-12 777CUT EXISTING WOOD BEAMS FLUSH WITH 5TH FLOOR INTERIOR FACE OF WALL 8 x 8 wood beam (e) BOND BM. — w/(2)-#4'SCONT. (2)-SIMPSON Y4"x 4 Y2" SDS SCREWS @ 3"O.C. jL6x6xY2"x V-13"Ig. / w/(3)-Y2"HILT[ HIT-HY 150 MAX ADHESIVE ANCHORS SPACED @8 O.C. EMBED. =4 Y2" SOFT WOOD SHIMS (1)SIMPSON Ya'x 4 Y2"SDS SCREW L6x6xy2"x l'-Ow Ig. j w/(2)Y2"HILTI HIT-HY 150 MAX ADHESIVE ANCHORS SPACED @ 8" [� O.C., EMBED. =4 Y2" kev BOND BM.W/(2)-#4'S CONT. TOP OF 4th FLOOR WINDOW r BOND BM.W/(2)-#4'S CONT. "STARTER COURSE" USE BLOCKING BONDING AGENT&BED WITH EPDXY MORTAR. ' l 5-10-12 'H OF o"� A M yN U Ln A�o� 9FC/STERE���`Q fSS/ONAL ENS'\ �(7. THE H.I.. TURNER GROUP Inc. JM COULL. INC• FIGURE: T[JRj�jER FW WEBS ALT. BEAM ""`""E0i5 E""MEES SUPPORT AT SK2 CONSOiUCTON WN10ER3 BUIUIINC SCIENi1313 COMPANY GROUP 2' .XE NSA" CMU WALL LONCOFO. XF,N NFMPSNIRE 03301 PHONE:1W31 08-11U SALEM W .HLW NEX.LON SCALE: 1"=1'-0" CONCORD NH HARRISON WE DAMME W MASSACHUSETTS PROJ.NUMBER: 3081 SATE: 05/10/2012 TURNER ® 27 Locke Road, Concord, NH 03301 (603)228-1122 GROUP The H. L. Turner Group Inc. ❑ 26 Pinewood Ln, Harrison, ME 04040 (207)583-4571 ❑ PO Box 89, Rt. 2, Danville,VT 05828(802)684-2134 ❑ PO Box 653, Londonderry, VT 05148 (802) 824-5616 Field Observation Report No. 1 CLIENT: F. W. Webb JOB NO.: 3081 PROJECT& LOCATION: F. W. Webb Building Repairs DATE: May 9, 2012 Bridge St. Salem, MA WEATHER: Overcast& Mild with Drizzle CONTRACTOR: J. M. Coull FIELD REPORT PREPARED BY: P.M. Becht JOB STATUS a`� „.,.: 8y n nr� tc r i. .Gra:: �ea=�-.n..:....cat A. I arrived on site at 10:00 a.m. I met with Mark Moschella and Dave Simmons from J. M. Coull. I also met with Dan Tammaro of IMECA Masonry. We toured the work area to observe the progress of the work. B. The staging was set and enclosed on the first section (i.e. south section) of building. Masons were demolishing the existing brick. Work had progressed from the roof down to a point approximately 2 to 3 feet above the fifth floor level. The demo'd brick was placed in plywood boxes approximately 4' x 4' x 3' high set on the fifth floor. When the boxes were full they were taken by pallet truck to the elevator. The work appeared to be progressing at a good pace. COMMENTS. °arc:;- r __ ° _,i it P 4 '_�. G ����6 csW,64 = _�,a€ .r; � :.�. C. Prior to the meeting, Dave made case to reconsider the removal of the brick on the north third of the building and instead consider repointing and local repairs as needed. He said the wood showed no sign of rot except for one location where the roof drain had let go and that there was no obvious bulging in the brick like is observed on the south half of the building. Both Mark and I said it would have to be discussed with persons at our respective offices. D. A meeting followed that included all of the parties above and the scaffolding subcontractor. A few safety concerns were discussed with respect to bracing, tiebacks, fasteners used for the enclosure around the staging and the debris chute. Also dust issues were discussed but because the dust issue is minor, respirators are voluntary and dust is controlled by water and fans. E. The mason mentions that he will be using the open bottom knock out style bond beams. There will be four bond beams installed. One will be used for the starter course, and then there will be one under the former roof beam, one under the fifth floor beam and one under the new roof beam. They will use back- to-back 4 x 3-1/2 x '/4 angle for lintels over the fifth floor windows only(since the first bond beam will be over the fourth floor window). They will provide 6-inches of bearing per side. F. The vertical rebar alongside the window jamb(i.e. two #4's) cannot run continuous because of the steel lintels on the fifth floor. They will try to get one bar continuous. G. The mason will use all pre-mixed mortars and grout. (Spec-Mix) The grout will be 3000 psi; apparently 2000-psi grout is no longer used. Mortar will be type "S". H. Mark left the meeting at 11:45 AM. After Mark left there was a discussion about using the existing brick for the fagade. Dan said he would like to use a color matched new brick. His price was quoted FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Ldoc using new brick. He mentioned a$10,000 adder to use the old brick and Dan felt the look would not be what the Owner expects. This is a non-structural issue but an aesthetics and cost issue. I. The mason will clean down to the top of the fourth floor window to sound brick. If there is loose of damaged brick at this level it will be replaced. With a solid base to build on he will install a first course consisting of a open bottom bond beam and it will be bedded in an epoxy mortar as called for on the plans. The bond beam will then be fully grouted. J. I promised Dave that I would revise the sketches SK-1 and—2 to show the actual field conditions that were found at the top of the wall and roof intersection. K. We discussed the clip angles that tie the existing wood beams t the new CMU. The design now call for the clip angles between the roof beams and CMU and the clip angles between the 5`h floor beams and CMU to be 6 x 6 x %z x 1'-8" long. There will be three 1/2"anchors (8"cc) into the CMU and two 1/4" Simpson SDS screws (3"cc) up into the timber. For the old roof beam just below the 5`h floor beam,the clip angle will a 6 x 6 xl/2 x 1'-0" long. For this clip angle there will be two-%s°'anchors into the CMU and one SDS Simpson '/4" screw up into the timber. L. I left the site at 12:15. POST MEETING NOTE: We looked at the weight that was being put on the floor from the pallet boxes used to collect the demolished brick. Upon further study, in order not to overload the floor system, we recommend that the boxes be no more than half full at any time. PERSONS CONTACTED: Mark Moschella. Dave Simmons (J M Coull), Dan Tammaro (IMECA Masonry) CC: File FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT Ldoc 2 TURNER ® 27 Locke Road, Concord, NH 03301 (603)228-1122 GROUP The H. L. Turner Group Inc. ❑ 26 Pinewood Ln, Harrison, ME 04040 (207) 583-4571 ❑ PO Box 89, Rt. 2, Danville, VT 05828(802)684-2134 ❑ PO Box 653, Londonderry, VT 05148(802)824-5616 Field Observation Report No. 2 CLIENT: F. W. Webb JOB NO.: 3081 PROJECT& LOCATION: F. W. Webb Building Repairs DATE: May 14 2012 Bridge St. Salem, MA WEATHER: Overcast& Mild CONTRACTOR: J. M. Coull FIELD REPORT PREPARED BY: P.M. Becht JOB STATUS: A. Bill Hickey and I arrived on site at 12:15 PM. We met with Dave Simmons from J. M. Coull and Dan Tammaro of IMECA Masonry. Also on site was the foreman for the roofing contractor. We toured the work area to observe the progress of the work and to discuss some issues. B. The masons had demolished the existing brickwork in Section"A"down to the top of the fourth floor windows. (Section"A" is the southernmost third of the east wall) Pallets of masonry block were being brought up to the fifth floor via the elevator and was being stacked and moved out onto the staging. The masons were scheduled to start laying block on Tuesday. C. The roofing crew was in the process of installing a 36"x 36"Bilco roof hatch adjacent to and inboard of the elevator shaft. D. The staging contractor was on site erecting the staging for Section`B" . COMMENTS: E. We discussed the detail at the top of the wall/roof interface. The roofer stated that the ISO filler would not work and that he needs solid wood blocking at the outside edge of the roof. We also learned that the detail for the brick corbel at the top was a series of four 1/2" steps and three flush courses of brick at the top. (See attached sketch SK-1R). It was decided that the wood beam and existing roof decking would be cut back flush with the inside face of the masonry. A stretcher course of block would be installed on top of the continuous bond beam, which will be just below the wood beams. A 12"long by 5/8" diameter threaded rod, with a nut on both ends, would be installed into the stretcher course. (6-inches embedment.) The roofer can use the rod to attach the solid wood blocking and then cut the rod flush with the wood. See detail on SK-1R. F. It was decided that the roofer would relocate the existing scupper outside the masonry. G. We discussed adding some control joints in the veneer layer of brick. It was decided to add a control joint around the corner on the south side of the building approximately 2-feet back from the corner. There will also be a control joint in each of the three sections of wall("A", `B:", and"C")along the east side. The control joint will be located alongside one of the windows. H. Since the existing wood beams have varying degrees of rot and deterioration in the ends, we discussed cutting back the existing wood beams flush with the inside face of the masonry wall. It was decided to cut the beams back but that there should be at least 4 inches of bearing on the steel clip angles that will be added at the fifth floor beams and the roof support beams and at least 2 to 2/l/2 inches of bearing for the old roof beams just below the fifth floor beams. Since there was considerable rot in the beams adjacent to the elevator shaft we discussed leaving the plywood support wall in place below the fifth floor beam,provided it was acceptable to the Owner. We decidied to fill in with wood framing between FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT 2.doc the old roof beam and the fifth floor beam approximately 4-feet back from the inside face of the masonry wall. The fifth floor beam and old roof beam would then be supported on a continuous wood framed wall. I. We discussed new brick versus using the existing brick for the outside veneer course. Since the interior brick was judged to be non-usable the mason said that there will not be enough usable brick from the original veneer course to complete the job. The mason felt the using the original brick would produce an inferior end product. After some discussion it was decided to go with the new brick for the veneer. We looked at the samples of new brick and selected the Bradford—"Watsontown" as the best match to the existing brick. J. We discussed the issue that Dave had brought up at the previous meeting concerning repairing rather than dismantling the brick wall at section"C" (the northern-most section of the wall). Bill said it was discussed internally and as Engineer of Record, H.L. Turner wants the brick taken down as planned. K. Upon examination of the existing brick course where the new block will be installed, it appeared sound and was judged to be in reasonably good condition. With some minor patching here and there it was judged to be acceptable to start the new masonry. Once again we discussed the procedure for the starter course using the specified Sika product. The interface will be cleaned of all dust and debris and a bonding agent will be brushed on as prescribed in the manufacturer's literature. The product will then be mixed with mortar to form the epoxy bedding mortar for the first course. L. We discussed the brickwork below the fourth floor window header. The exterior joints were deteriorated and need repointing. As EOR it is our opinion that if F W Webb plans to hold onto the building for the foreseeable future then repointing of the remaining existing brickwork should be seriously considered. The recommended procedure would be to rake out approximately 1/2" of the old mortar, down to sound mortar and repoint the joint with a standard concave tooled joint. We left the site at 1:15. PERSONS CONTACTED: Dave Simmons (J M Coull), Dan Tammaro (IMECA Masonry), and Foreman for Roofing Contractor CC: File FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT 2.doe 2 TURNER Z 27 Locke Road, Concord, NH 03301 (603)228-1122 GROUP The H. L. Turner Group Inc. ❑ 26 Pinewood Ln, Harrison, ME 04040 (207) 583-4571 ❑ PO Box 89, Rt. 2, Danville, VT 05828(802)684-2134 ❑ PO Box 653, Londonderry,VT 05148(802)824-5616 Field Observation Report No. 3 CLIENT: F. W. Webb JOB NO.: 3081 PROJECT& LOCATION: F. W. Webb Building Repairs DATE: June 14, 2012 Bridge St. Salem, MA WEATHER: Sunny and warm CONTRACTOR: J. M. Coull FIELD REPORT PREPARED BY: P.M. Becht 'JOB STATUS: A. Bill Hickey and I arrived on site at 12:45 PM. We met with Dave Simmons from J. M. Coull and Dan Tammaro of IMECA Masonry. Also on site were the masonry crew,the scaffolding contractor, the roofing contractor and the carpenters. We toured the work area to observe the progress of the work and to discuss some issues. B. The staging was nearing completion for section"A". Staging now extends across sections "A" and"B". C. The carpenters were installing pressure treated blocking around some window openings on the fourth level. D. Masons were finishing up the work on section"B" and preparing for the demo work to begin on section "XI E. The roofers were installing the blocking and sloped filler board along the edge of section`B". Metal edging had not yet been installed along the new roof edge. COMMENTS: F. We looked at the front corner of the building— Section"A" near Bridge St. The discussion centered on where the control joint should be and how to finish off the brickwork at the front. The emphasis was on aesthetics and how the finished construction would look from Bridge Street. We discussed three options: Option 1-Repeat the same construction technique as was used on the rear of the building with all new brick and a control joint on the front(Bridge st. side) approximately 2-feet in from the corner. Option 2- Locate the control joint 2-feet back from the front on the east wall within Section"A". New brick would then be installed from the control joint and wrapped around the comer and toothed into the sound existing brick. All deteriorated or broken existing brick would be replaced with new brick. Option 3 - Install a control joint 2-feet back from the front corner on the east wall within Section"A". New brick would continue to the comer but any brick or brick face exposed on the front face(Bridge St. face)of the building would utilize the existing old brick. The mason may have to clean two to three dozen existing bricks to complete the corner and tooth in around the front. Cracked and broken bricks would be replaced with sound existing brick. Any brick showing on the front face(i.e. Bridge St. side) would be existing brick. TTG said they would discuss the options wit Mark Moschella of J M Coull and reach a consensus. Post Meeting Note: On a follow up call with Mark on Wednesday morning June 13th it was decided to go with Option 3. G. The installation of the steel angle clips under the floor and roof beams was discussed. It was agreed that any beam at the end of the building or any beam adjacent to an internal cross wall between section"A" and"B" and "B" and"C"could be supported with a shorter 12-inch clip. All clips supporting the sloped FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT 3.doc roof beams were shimmed with composite shims. It was determined that the plywood shear walls could be removed at any location where the steel clip was installed and shimmed and all bolts and screws were in place and nuts tightened. There is one exception on wall removal, see the next item. H. The plywood shear wall on Level 4 in section"C"adjacent to the elevator shaft will remain in place. In addition a"pony"wall will be constructed between the old roof beam and the fifth level floor beam. Since there is a slight misalignment between the two beams the"pony"wall will be constructed from 2 x 10's and will extend from the face of the masonry back approximately 4 to 5 feet. It was decided that the"pony"wall would not have to be sheathed with plywood. L All of the beams were cut flush with the inside face of the new CMU wall. There are a few beams that still show signs of rot in the wood. These beams shall be covered plated with Y4" CDX plywood. Two layers of plywood shall be added to each side of the existing wood beams. The plywood shall extend out from the wall 4-feet. The width of the plywood strips shall match the depth of the beam. The plywood shall be secured with three rows of SDS screws spaced 16-inches apart. J. At one location near the elevator a steel beam was bearing on a newly installed steel bearing plate anchored into the new CMU. It was decided to have the welder weld the bottom flange of the beam to the plate with a 1"to 1-1/2" long fillet weld and then to weld along the underside of the beam to the bearing plate with a minimum 3/16" fillet weld. We left the site at 2:00. PERSONS CONTACTED: Dave Simmons (J M Coull), Dan Tammaro (IMECA Masonry), and Peter (Foreman for Carpenters) CC: File FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT 3.doc 2 TURNER ® 27 Locke Road, Concord, NH 03301 (603)228-1122 GROUP The H. L. Turner Group Inc. ❑ 26 Pinewood Ln, Harrison, ME 04040 (207) 583-4571 ❑ PO Box 89, Rt. 2, Danville, VT 05828 (802)684-2134 ❑ PO Box 653, Londonderry,VT 05148 (802) 824-5616 Field Observation Report No. 4 CLIENT: F. W. Webb JOB NO.: 3081 PROJECT& LOCATION: F. W. Webb Building Repairs DATE: June 28, 2012 Bridge St. Salem, MA WEATHER: Sunny and warm CONTRACTOR: J. M. Coull FIELD REPORT PREPARED BY: P.M. Becht JOB STATUS bg "' 9 i�p, 'k=. a A. Bill Hickey and I arrived on site at 9:15 AM. We met with Dave Simmons from J. M. Coull and Dan Tammaro of IMECA Masonry. The masons were on site working. We toured the work area to observe the progress of the work and to discuss the remaining work. We also started a punch list for Areas"C" and `B". (See end of report.) B. The staging was in place for section"A"and the crew was completing the brick work in this area. The CMU was complete for section "A". The brick work was about 75 to 80%complete. C. Once the masons have completed Section "A"work,the roofers are scheduled to return to complete the membrane for Section"A"and complete the metal edging alone the entire east side of the building. D. The roofers shall also be responsible for installing new scupper boxes and downspouts. There will be a total of five scupper boxes with downspouts and the scuppers will be approximately 8"x 12"and the downspouts will be rectangular 3"x 4". The color of the edging, scuppers and downspouts will be bronze to match the trim of the windows. E. The masons had done an excellent job thus far on the front corner of the building, matching new brick in with the old brick. F. We walked the fourth and fifth floor and reviewed the work completed to date. The following is a list of punch list items to be completed. Note,this is not a complete list as work was still ongoing. The final walk-through/punch list will be completed during the week of July 91'. 1. In general, overall clean-up is required. With regard to sections"C"and`B"the outside face of the east wall needs to be cleaned. The areas to be cleaned include those areas where the staging was up against the building and left powered residue and dried mortar on the existing brickwork. 2. The windows shall be cleaned. 3. Cleaning and regrading of the area in the rear of the building is required. 4. Section "C",Fifth Floor, Southeast corner—repoint joint on inside face of south wall at corner 5. Section`B"—any granite sills that are cracked should be caulked to prevent moisture intrusion (Note, this item is outside the job scope) 6. Section "C"and`B", fourth floor—some of the windows, at the windowsills the inside bricks are loose and in need of repointing. (Note, this item is outside the job scope.) We left the site at 10:45 AM FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT 4.doc PERSONS CONTACTED: Dave Simmons(J M Coull), Dan Tammaro (IMECA Masonry) CC: File FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT 4.doc 2 TURNER ® 27 Locke Road, Concord, NH 03301 (603)228-1122 GROUP The H. L. Turner Group Inc. ❑ 26 Pinewood Ln, Harrison, ME 04040(207)583-4571 ❑ PO Box 89, Rt. 2 Danville,VT 05828 (802)684-2134 ❑ PO Box 653, Londonderry,VT 05148(802)824-5616 Letter of Transmittal To City of Salem,Building Inspector Date 5/30/06 120 Washington Street Job Title FW Webb—Salem,MA Salem, MA 01970 Job No. 3081 Attn: Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Re: Temporary Structural Repairs We are sending you attached via Next Day the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ® Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Specifications ❑ Product Cuts ❑ Other COPIES DATE (DENT. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 set 5/30/06 Sl & S2 Temporary Structural Repairs These are transmitted as checked below ❑ For your approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For instruction ® For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Resubmit_copies for approval ® As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return _corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Remarks: Copy to: F.W. Webb Attn: Bob Signed: Matvichuk J M Coull Attn: Chris Bill Hickey, Structural r=ngineer Oldham C Oldham 05-30-06.doc TURNER ® 27 Locke Road, Concord, NH 03301 (603)228-1122 GROUP The H. L. Turner Group Inc. ❑ 26 Pinewood Ln, Harrison, ME 04040 (207)583-4571 ❑ PO Box 89, Rt. 2 Danville,VT 05828 (802)684-2134 ❑ PO Box 653, Londonderry,VT 05148(802)824-5616 Field Observation Report No. 02 CLIENT: JM Coull, Inc. JOB NO.: 3081-03 PROJECT& LOCATION: FW Webb Temporary Structural Repairs DATE: 5/25/06 WEATHER: Cloudy, 60's CONTRACTOR: JM Coull, Inc.(JMC) FIELD REPORT PREPARED BY: W. Hickey JOB STATUS: 1. The purpose of the site visit was to review the items outlined in field report#01 with Mike Signorello of JMC. Specifically the shims required behind the 2"x 2"washers. 2. The nuts were originally not tightened to spec. According to JMC, the 2"x 2"washers got caught on the anchor rod threads. JMC's framing subcontractor tightened the nuts and the majority of the 2"x 2"washers came into full contact with the wall stud. 3. The few 2"x 2"washers that did not have full contact with the wall were shimmed as required. COMMENTS: 1. The work is now complete and the project is in conformance with the project drawings and specifications. Sheet S2 has been revised to include a note regarding the shims and issued as an"as-built"drawing. PERSONS CONTACTED: M. Signorello(JMC) CC: G. Blanchette (TTG), C Oldham (JMC), file 3081 FOR#02.doc __—L -- - I GENERAL MOTES 1, /a LL COr.IC2ETE 4HALL FE. LIGHTWEIGHT AGG2GGATE , IIS ?Cr- NIA+ , 3000 PSI u 28 DAr5 1Z, ALL R.E-P•DAC- -SHALL P.:, E ASTM Col5 . 3 ADE_ 40 - 3. ALL GOVCRf=TES MASONRY UP,IITS CGMU) SHALL P,E LI6HTwEI6NT ACaZL' CA?r_ E x PANDEO 'SHALE , 6LAG o2 PUMI CCL . 4. ALT.-2NATE 'SH/\LL AAVE -t)1.J2- 0 •WAL1. 301JT 2E1/, 6rCING S. Gc•ASCr�+-:_TL P2E�/.�ST PVaNIc oVE2 ;HAFT 51-IAL-L. SZ_ THE _ MAZTIr-I F12cC} ^�oo � Ir�C, GO . Oir E4UIVAL_ENT. - 6. 5•TR.LICTUZAL STEEL SHALL 2.c ASTM A- Z(e -7, PAINT 'ALL, ST2UCTURAL STrEL piles SHOjR C.oAT g: DOCK 'LEVE:L$LP_ INgTALL/aTION SHALL F3E APPZoV1=D Z Y owNC-n 6LTOC� PLl2C1aA$E ` _ I CUT UlE.W DOO{Z OP 'N 9.-1=URNtSN ALL E-LFC:TRIGAL A5 aPGGIFIEb �Y c7WNCfL _ _-.--� 10, ALL C.x1'E.R1oG... C.xPO'�ED M-IN60n.RY Wcn K SHALL NIATG41 1=x1 '�TItiIG i312tC1r AS .:uEAZLY TO 8' `uIOTN � I AS TALO - S\ P�L� i _ II IJE1U DOCK F5IjMPE. - -- CLOSE UP wwooW oP' uc,, I I FA14�15? UEW OOCIC. LEV, ! I It REMOVESIZE 12321CK W4LL MFG .-SHoP OwG /Z! /6 LIAJTEL GGE55 Ooo2 BEWW Q" L;1A1. CMu ! { ! I Wg! I i I di rl0 I - I --I I --REMOVE E><IS7' P,1 5, PLAr,Ir I L_� I I i WBxRa k1ALLS � .DIDEb I I � I I I 10' B��ClEA2 ICO" I i N UEW _- 7 CRET i t I I 3i I A015TurAY -. �- I YPE Co EPLALII� � I L,W. CM.U. WALLS t,lLW ZcecF SHA R T ST - N - 2Lti 3'12 '/4 LIUTEL I I I r I I I 1I - If � LL �L A LEA. 3'-0" A3Ov� ExiST'G. L'.00F AT �IfGt-I Poi�JT. S-HAFT ROOF FRAMIMG PLAIN i I I II 'SrU I s __ I I I II T 21.5 '� K CLOSE UP EXIST'G -- + I wluDow OP'AJG I i w12 �2 , WCOD r\IAILFRS, GLLIT. ETC� I I � i I g PLY R,UILT UP TLO0F ! — — j O REMOVE WK 771G. G, 4't II wo, uto 1 I � I B. JE)QlCk vjAIL _.___ N lo' to" clEAe uoteT wA� - 12" 1 , FL00Q_ ' FRAMIMG SPRA?^F,P,, OQ EQUIV. I 3 E F02 2 HZ I LOTECT,0Q U 'F I IU' LItJTCL PzLOCV LILITgL STr EL PLIRLINS c2 2.3/g" r:rEcoo>✓ I I SCALE iy : 1'- 0 NE.W 8" L.W. CMU I ( C& X81 0002 Pr.AME PYGt, AJEW 8'1 L.W. CMV WALLS CLOSE Up WIIJC)OW OP'N16 X. RoO F ^ I 1 NevJ wIo12 - � I -- 514E4VE 7Cs 3Y — -- -- -- ( --- 1 +-- -- L -- — -- - -I I- ---- 10T Sp—ELEVATOR CONTR. -1 -- --- — -- I C � - El 12" 3RICk wALL SHALL J I= C 1 , � - ! I �' v I I JEW 8 RGMQ111 UL1DEtL SLAG, -- °�¢.. : I•-p•. - LSOTL: SEE SEC.TbS-S,.Co G FoR ST LL EL BM . EEACIUG 71.TAI1 S x tJ � CO NC.SLA6 f l .REMOVE AP�OVE FIFTH FLOOR FRAMIMG PL_AQ 1'-0" so, x24" (LT. w�T.)¢ W/ '�4"CIiK'D. IQCOVEIL t „ - - � � o o CUT SLOT FOR NEW • _ .SCALAE i/4.. _ I'•O" 3 \ JISLAB S0GE CL SE UP De-.)Or- ; r Ef(ISTG,_IC.` 13LICK MALL gi 2 CLOSE UP ALL WINDOW .`NIMS t VJE.D6E5 8 -I ��I -3 SETS NAUI!aEE CLIPS i OFACE�F3QICICW/g 1CMU PACK P i3 2 ' `` ' I 2• C8x II. S iKIATALL OWE i,- (� ` ' 3 3�¢ BOLTS PIPE SPCRS _. -' A� A Tihlt IU1c7eDE2T0 -� � F KIST G. ICs" SQ. (�QICK pIEeS , ` C Pf'OVIDE CotJT, WALLS PP&2T '-- 2 C8 x 11:5 + 1� 15'/2 K /4 ' IAIJGEZ CLIP ` E7S ` I �II tJEW LIUTEL �2 °O FLUOt` , .. ..; -- —_1 I CCo"8.2 ODOR FRAME BY G,C• _ L3x3rU4 w� 3/Q' PoaLiS FZ1\ -11QG �L�ati ouCY) ,,UL { 1 Ho .R SLOTS 31MILa2 R E MbvE EkigT' SOFFITIti15112 < I/ rILIIIl2'z fc: � LJEUJ 8' OPtiG AT TosECTC. . i i LOAn1NG �ac1` , ` P, rICK wa�L FOUMDATIOM PRAM I(a" LltiTEL-Pb LOCIk LIIJTEL 5C ALE '/4" n 1'- O" x 10 8„ CLE42 HOISTWAY I O O 10" A,T UPPED FLoofLS� PLS. ._ �REMOVE rune STAlt CONSTP. . W. S" CMU N 'SECT., 7 O — liO rG OTHEJ ' _�, �0 / (]h�IT - / nL'L N C�21�A2 PS57l ,. PUN? zocr%ADD 10., U E,EAI-4 ( , EA I-LO D� ...., L,' NO. DATE -REVISION BY PROJECT NO. 4 J 1WEVJ tulo � l2 DET/�ILS Ih EI I ' I i ' 5 M • f \J t MAY 2G,19Et f // PRDJECT DpAWN BY QEUJ FREIGHT ELEVATOR kFD F. W. WE:gb GC1 . Il1C . NEKDBY T_ 1 1 295 t3RIDGE 'ST, , SALEM MA'.4ACH115LT TS 5 i Yr. AIL FLccrts Ken Dennison Associates, Inc. ! R _ rool Professional Engineers T \( R I C /-\L F L OOR F R 4\M I MG R L 4\ NJ C2Nn 3 a n 4 n+ ) L 0 -ATI 0 .NJ P L A, \N..,\ Box 364, No. Reading, MA 01864 t Phone 944.8440 SCALE '/�„ g I'- 0.. -. , + _ .1_.OF 2 SHTS r - t - r I ! I NEW ?SUNIPE-RS AIUCHo RED Ly, I" FL. i I "2•�C.T�t3 iio uEw coucRCTE_ t : .. .. Ex12xi4 GIItoL`12.-?-- P�LoCK . SNltiq� nT uEw IA112■22-' NEW w12k22 ° IST.{'•L, ExISTG 1(, IG - g fl 12x3/4x1' gCICK PILL- II L, uEa1 STRUT GUT Poc.KET SET t3EAN tl? BRICK �Le 3 3x3/8 dP So_Ip - -- - - - - . `ULE.V, 'IT LX1'�TIN1G ` _._ n ,I 1 __-- E_X. gSMT I - -- -- - --- ----------- — - --- 1�lEW L.W. CFtU T P oUTD X. 'SLAP, IusEnILSE--- - L0P or JP t Fol NUS ST U 2 T $OUD riEW C.NIU IISTD -31 IEXIST'C Fj21Clc h1ASO NRti A5 MUC.N AS t5 . P2AC7lcXL - -- -- - _-------- -- --- - S _ AC.GoeDItiG TO -10 F5 Co idDI TIuMS ECT. 4 - 4 i SCALE '/d �I� W . N1ASt� �12 DETAI�s �; No 5CALr_ I O . ^ Ek. 2 ° FL. ILI I. - , NEW 2•CSx11,5 LIAITEL 1;-. J AIEw SorriT u 17 fZxl/4,i ,'_ill'/Z w/ 4 AA1CNoR5 C^FFSFT - .I LIVE OF EXIbTG. JAMPJ / TO CLEAR G)PPOSITE SipE ANCHORS I NEuJ '4AMP, of M' wiDF_ D002-_ REP�.1R � PnlntT ,4FTEC. I ..GV NT. C_. DOOr_ C>P'f4G . St,T IN WET - FICC/.� _ SZb Or T�11.1. 2N: 8 IJ AILI- (ti kll • Gotri 3' CUr N�., - Ex ISTG F LILT-LIP 5TN GanIGGt=T E_ -- / - - - a - t,' I S I IO'•B' CLEAN 931ST WAy --_ '1 A' -- --s t 1 it L S <'�r�/Z CONT. AT El'cV, EX.FCOo£ EAF1 �. /�DOOC SILL SE;Oki p NEw wtoxl2 - [wST'G 1ST FLooL FIN: :FIDOP ■ _ R�CNT P>A2 wFELT)ED - ...-.._._..- _._-_.___ __ - ___-_ _ ____:. _...- J _ _ --- - ---- _ _. Wit--- .-_.-- - - - - S • ' SET IN ISLACL" gEFUttL 1;' --. 5uK1tAS C `LU`D —'" LEVc�EC PIT 12 L,ul NoNC �'IW Gft OI - EY . 2 / G PLANK Y _- J -- "..____.---- - ` G LIT OLT W10 L M,1KE. tl o - 7 B _ 412 Ekl l IT . .. PI I wAtt-s _ EIC , GIZDEIZ =-- < SEAT wNERE GVEA"0CE 2EIUFOrLU11G V; /,,, PLAGIlriG Go1JC('�F TL -- NF_W wIQ,•2� ---- _ I � C ' l'S LOW. (6EVELFD AT ST" � R.00F � � � M111U. SLAB C.w. Co.l<. -- E,CIST G GO" FSRIGtL WALL T i - U£w VJIG 31 -- s 2KC. LlA1LEP`�/ -- 5" L.W. C_ouc. -DEI'T14 TO FIT ` ! -- 5LOCC COuIvS IQC , 4-,-44- CONT. ExTEQr) IrUTo P_>C!1D P.NIL I THIS DETA1� T'fPICAL AT F_Ae-14 fL4oC - 1_ooF _MF_W -UJIO'K12 _ . rfc: 12 . 6QICK T�+ BE. � OtJO DOOM 3ANfF�S . � I ' C _ I Cc" u.T.S. a � =• AtkF1tL : (5L0r ttD AT S SECT. J —Ta 5 ExISTINIL 85NT `oLAa, -, '~ I � - EK1STC. CLOT CCAuiTE FD1.1, f . - - - - �---'— 'r--�----. _ 3/4.._1, o..- -.-_ _ .---- { _ _ � a f NEW sump 2x 4x'18 L FrANE -/AQoy; > 1 _ - i ELEVAic-Z OUT `. ^ I d-�CKCA$IgG CLIT OJ FZI k .t GZAut� E.' L- KISt'G .TIMgEQ PILES ;, 1 IF :r-F_Q D, 7o CLEAN �I T"Y. P, DO �' 2.. 6ILL �DLT�. � �.. EL EV 1ACK C_A.SING SEc�. -1 -- ( •lA AS NOTED 4TK , SGAL�i r �, rE i NAT ST" FL , 11'a SPECIAL GUILT ISP .Ex16TIMC Cot1STtI , 1 DUE. TTL r-bm �r-rR, GoQva- -S%o M F2oM (LocaF. 4r � K � ECT [ON 1 - 1 � scISTG. EICk F121_WALL - - -•_ to - sr r 3¢° d EX: t t o02 RooF + - - -- - --- --.._ ----- - - - - -- - P 711 ERT OF P I E IEA I I o — UC PEE I1 I � { NEw un,lE:� w� EX. FL. R>"_-54 - /.. S/ ,.L I 1� 8x / 2 RE4r D SSoL75 CS 3'x % 90 1 14 ( ` _� L✓ NOTES FoIZ .N.T I .. z51�o 1� W`tl.p - -- _ 5P11o2E P,�S � UExT 3 ��ToR1ES UP .'..- '.- DRQ PACK vll. - ----1�-;'." NEvf w 10K12 -. , 2uD Wim , SIoE c F Gow111J © ;FO1�[ -- -- ' _ NUAI- SN21►.lY� C CUT-TWC DUT (3rzICIC W PIER -Fo2 f i -- _— 3K11/4_ LIS-6 OF NAIUGEP_ . INSTALL I 4x40 / FILLE.T 1 eT 01.11E 5iDE AMD Gr2ouT F,,EFoz - I � 2 { W ►C.K31 I G/zlje2 OMIT QCMI CM. , A40 65t1l[ 1 FL. ELEVS. T3 i� t3x`l xo'- cuTT1Qr. OUT cnP1 SLUE , 5TEGl. _ LE-FsU1l0 gfICK __. 1 3; '�, - /7 NO. DATE - - REVISION BY is Cu T PO GK ET. F,,P, £3 I. ... -: K FAPjrICAlor',.. .SHALL.,' FU2AlISH 4 [ - Al'j ZEA D • - � -!} ' SHEET TITLE PTL EOT NO. r. _ - f� 6 _ .. � I -II O � � i _I I "1 " � i _ � IS CEL �r,pLAT [. To T3E us> o S �`CTt01.15 C) ET AtLS BGAE ______.__—..—_ A5 AIDTED '. �2� K�L1PASoL.IDAM ,. ! � � I! I Fo>w ALIGftMFrl.lT nF' t3oL.?b . — 2L5 �X4x1/e L 6 Isr EL, 18. 26 V•tHEN SGTTILIG GR.O vTIn3G - -- - I C' [ JI � Il t _ _ � DATE 2rao µALF 01 NAiJGE2 ASSN - - - - - 111=vJ W I(ox �jl 7ACIC NE&D5 = (llEu1 FSE MA 2c --- __ ,082 E OMWN BY .. 1G����V�J-dam Kyo • STI --_`_, 1—I L_C_ .�j—.}-� /' . 1 -- _ � �. _ LtEW W1bv'SiI ---.11.i _._ O.elO � _ I.JVI..O ` W. VVE.P P--, L0 , , INt. .. GHEGtED BY Tlt ae� r - Lt�B �1�/4x0` 111/2". 295 P�CI10<'.E SL SALEM M� S'�AGNiISETT EXI ST'G. 1(o klCe PIErL - _ T ry g 1 '� kl Grtou 1 AF 1 �L: DR.t�.{4�., ONAwING NO. 4 kr= I �ilvly r 511T _ EL.9.1Co — vJ0ZV, IS 2E•SUILI BEFoIZE _DVS PACK A"VL Ken Qannison Associates Inc. [ #'M1U, SIZE SHORE w BUILT UP Sltl'S - - - MA Professional Engineers 2 Box 364, No. Reading, MA 01864 J 2 2 Phone 944-8440 --„ _.__ S H O PO U G _ E C O l__C 112„ OP z BHTB NEW 2x6 WALL TO BE ADDED TYP. FOR (9) SEE SHEET S2 FOR NOTES, SECTIONS & DETAILS. O B Q C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 D FFFTRN�0Q0R ; C1 i -7- _ _ — _, __ _ — __ _ - ___. _ __... _ ___ ._. . 7 r — I. lir �'` \�' 1.. II•'' '.. r1 �\•t / r" ,...,;�`�. "u� IF '%"'� yC� ..n�..• GROUP I ,../ .>' \ . t � ! \f l I l 4/ f' �. ,,''t� i'\ '`•. t �",..r�'1 f"., !:`. �' I , : q INDICATES THE AREA OF THE 5th FLOOR NOT TO �! F' BE USED FOR STORAGE Fi :I '' " OF MATERIAL II i; '.,I i J"' II '+. ,L I }S•11+ �.��`. ' '.4' '.,,L/ i`` x + is ' " �' %\ .I: ,+j{ l a ''X '+, '..,1 '� '..l " \( l,• THE H.L. TURNER GROUP Inc. 8" x 8' COLUMNS (E) 8" x 8" COLUMNS (E) ,, .. + ,8,. x 1 8.. COLUMNS E /* , � ;' Jj II _ I it I., t' t Inti •E/` N J t .+ '..,�i'�. ! 1, 1 S ,::� e . \/� f � 12'-0" +/— O.C. 12'-0" +/ OfC. I �,' '\ . I � ,/-12'-1)" +/— O.C. ( ) x / '11-% �ti ! ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS G— F.-- — .—r- —� -- --,— --- - —=_: ���1 ._._-' - a i'• .- ._ ._.-L__'' '—.__X.__;x X� CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS O ! _._._ _-- BUILDING SCIENTISTS 3 r; x 27 LOCKE ROAD CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301 Iii 'o • i i ; I I ( : ^+ '+ T-(603) 225-1122 / F-(603) 228-1126 II i ! ( v v - •' '' ! - • - � , , ;:. j i ; 'i I I CONCORD NH HARRISON ME• DANVILLE VT rA I I n I ! t I JM CQULL, INC. j I it L r x 1 � � �' I ; � ' i I tuildin�a your 1 uivn_. � 2' WOOD BEAMS (E) � „ ; i � I 8" x 12" WOOD BEAMS (E) y it � ! � I �— 8" x 12" WOOD �EAMS (E) MAYNARD, MA 01754 i PHONE: (978) 461-0330 FAX: (978) 461-0275 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER I. 10' SPACES @ 6'-0" O.C. " I ,! 10 SPACES Q 6'-0" O.C. 10 SPACES C)' 6'-0" O.C. COPYRIGHT : THE H.L TURNER GROUP INC. 2006 6x1:0 RAFTERS (E) ; ' i! ! 6x1,0 RAFTERS (E) I ! 6x110 RAFTER (E) I 'Dectronic images of these documents may be used for the , j ! ( s ! purpose of expediting shop drawings and coordination drawings for this project only. It shall be unlawful to use them for any other purpose. The Architect's or Engineer's seals shall not appear on I, d !1 any documents that are modified by others. The Architect shall :__- _. _�,_.. _..._-.- __ -. _-__-.._ :,_ .__._ ,.�. .._. :._-. _ ,.: i .. I , ...-...— ._. _ _.. __- �___.. _._...._ ._._._ _. __._ _ _. ...._ _ '! _.._ ..._L .__ .___.-..__.... I .. _- bear no responsibility for on modifications to the original 1. ._ __-.... _._— —___. _.._._._ —_�...—_ ____. _._.. -_._..� .—_ _.___ .._.,... -_.._. ._..._._ _. -__. — -.;... ._.. __.__ _...._._ .. --_ __— _— _- _ - _ _ _ _ - _.______ -..._.__ documents b others y 9 I I; 1 ISSUED FOR I,_0,. 60'-3" +/- I,_0., I!� 58'-9" 4/- CONCEPTUAL S2 +/- _I CONCEPTUAL DESIGN I SECTION A SCHEMATIC DESIGN I SECTION B ( SECTION C i. 1 j DESIGN DEVELOPMENT C1G\CCPD NORiN � O O �1 FINAL REVIEW C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 IU/J O O ROOF FRAMING PLAIN o CONSTRUCTION S 1 SCALE.• 1/8" = 1'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NEW 2x6 WALL TO BE ADDED TYP. FOR (9) SEE SHEET S2 FOR MEN NOTES, SECTIONS & DETAILS. O O PC2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7C1 : 1 It REVISIONS \ THERE ARE NO LOADING + ' RESTRICTIONS ON THE 1 4TH FLOOR :. j: ^ ELEVATOR j 8" x 8" COLUMNS (E) 8" x 8" COLUMNS (E) j 8" x 8" COLUMNS (E) 1 '-0" + O.C. f 12' D" +/— OC. • 12 t " I I:C3 I 1 T i I• : ! I: REY PLAN NTS ADDRESS PROJECT T11ZR / j to � JM COULL, INC. F.W. WEBB COMPANY : 2 I' I 2 � 95 BRIDGE ST. 8" x 12" WOOD BEAMS E SALEM, MA. ( ) i 8" x 12" WOOD BEAMS (E) 8" x 12" WOOD BEAMS (E)I II, h S i ! j PROI. NO.: 3081 STAMP 9 3 I; 10 SPACES @ 6t'-0" +/— O.C. III 10 SPACES @ 6'L0" +/— `O.C. 10 SPACES @ 6'-0" + O.C. I 6x PO JOISTS E / SICALE: AS NOTED ���tN LASS j I 6x10 JOISTS QE) I I ii 6x10 JOISTS �E) ..__. L_ _._- ..�_ _..L_ __ �.; WDH �• H - - y _._ TU ---- 1 - -- f �i i.. 1 . ..__ __...__ --. _-- _- ._..__ -_ _ =_ -._-- '-- _ —. II --.._-_ _._.._-. __ ---- _. _.--- --- _ - -.__-. _. ------ -- r.:____--.. __ ____._.�. .._---_ _ DI&llIN BY: TJH �:� ST COSSI ti -_ I I i I _ I 1 CM BY: GRB ST 60'-3" + _ I 1 ! I SICNAL /- 1'-0" ►►►III 58'-9„ +/- j•_0" S2 60'-0'.. +/- ! ISSUE DATE:3/37/0 SHEET TTTLE TEMPORARY sEcnoN n CALLS OftTH ' SECTION B SECTION C '.STRUCTURAL REPAIRS C 1 I ! � 5 j I i I 2 5TH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN S 1 SCALE. 1/8" = 1'-0" F.W. ViMB CONFAB DIRECTORY: 3081 FRE NAME: 3081-Sl TURNER WOOD ROOF DECKING (E) \! _ DBL. TOP PL f GROUP FASTEN TO BOTTOM OF EXIST. BEAM W/16d NAILS ' . j EAST SIDE 8" x 12" WOOD BEAM (E) SPACE NAILS 0 8" O.C. ; STAGGERED 8" x 8" WOOD POST (E) I TIE JOISTS OO�Y J .I ri DBL. STUD, TYREACH END WEST SIDE F" 2 x 6's 0 16" O.C. PROVIDE SHIMS AS REQ'D BETWEEN 2x2" THE H.L. TURNER GROUP Inc. \ CUT-TO-FIT WASHERS & WALL STUDS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE f \ ' CONTACT AREA. ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS N h - LINE OF SHEATHING /J CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS • BUILDING SCIENTISTS 27 LOCKE ROAD CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301 T-(603) 228-1122 / F-(603) 228-1126 1/2" did. A36 THREADED RODS WITH CONCORD NH • HARRISON ME• DANVILLE VT 3/8" x 8" x 8" PLATES ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL AND 1/4" x 2" x 0'-2" PLATES ON THE INSIDE OF THE DBL. STUD j a WOOD FLOOR DECKING (E) DBL. BOTTOM PLATE THE BOLT HOLES SHALL BE DRILLED FROM j _' +'' C, h ' i FASTEN TO EXISTING FROM THE OUTSIDE IN. TYP. FOR 2 ( ) L i DECKING W/16d NAILS 2x6 SPACER � 8" x 8" WOOD POST (E) SPACE NAILS 0 8" O.0 BETWEEN STUDS CONTINOUS 2x10 TIE JOISTS - JM COULL INC. STAGGERED 2016" O EN SHEATH h 5th FLOOR _.. ISuilritny Your V.=rinn -_ - - - - _ - _ _ - _ _ STUDWALLS. CUTPENING INTO _ � - __ - SHEATHING TO ALLOW FOR MAYNARD, MA 01754 _.- A2x10S. PHONE: (978) 461-0330 FASTEN 2� CONT.O S TO 2x6 STUDS. FAX: (978) 461-0275 , CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 'r-- ENDS OF JOISTS HAVE ROTTED (E) COPYRIGHT : THE B.L. TURNER GROUP INC. 2006 WOOD ROOF DECK/NG (E) i� DBL. TOP /P 'Electronic images of these documents may be used for the FASTEN TO BOTTOM OF purpose of expediting shop drawings and coordination drawings for EX/ST BEAM W/16d NA/LS ' this project only. It shall be unlawful to use them for any other 8" x 12" WOOD BEAM (E) SPACE NAILS 0 8" O.C. `,,` .9 purpose. The Architect's or Engineers seals shall not appear on any documents that aro modified by others. The Architect shall STAGGERED4 x 6 UNDER JOIST HAS ROTTED (E) bear no responsibility farany modifications to the original 8" x 8" W000 POST (E) ASTUD 0 documents by others .• i TIE JOISTS ONLY i ISSUED FOR 6 x 10 JOISTS 0 6'-0" O.C. +/- (E) 1/2" did. A36 THREADED RODS WITH DBL. STUD, i TYP.EA H END /j 3/8" x 8" x 8" PLATES ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL AND 1/4" x 2" x 0'-2" PLATES CONCEPTUAL DESIGN i ON THE INSIDE OF THE DBL. STUD 2 x 6's 0 16" O.C. THE BOLT HOLES SHALL BE DRILLED FROM + o CUT-TO-FIT FROM THE OUTSIDE IN. (TYP. FOR 2) SCHEMATIC DESIGN LINE OF SHEATHING r DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROVIDE SHIMS AS REQ'e9 BETWEEN 2"x2" WASHERS & WALL STUDS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FINAL REVIEW CONTACT AREA. FABOTTOM STEN TO EXISTING 2x6 SPACER Q CONSTRUCTION DECKING W/16d NAILS BETWEEN STUDS SPACE NAILS 0 8" O.0 4th FLOOR STAGGERED NO �. ,. _s _ T FOR CONSTRUCTION WOOD FLOOR DECKING i 12'-0" 6 x 12 JOISTS 0 3'-O" O.C. +/- (E) 12" x 12" WOOD BEAM (E) 9" x 9" WOOD POST (E) 0 5-30-06- ISSUED "AS-BUMTS" 0 4-7-06- REVISE BOLTING TO WALL 1 PA R TIA L BUILDING SEC TIO lel W000 FLOOR DECKING (E) REVISIONS SZ SCALE.' 3/8" = l'-0" WOOD ROOF DECKING (E) ENLARGED DETAIL 6 x 10 JOISTS 0 6'-0" O.C. +/- (E) CONT. 2x10 TIE JOISTS (2) NEAR PERIMETER FRAMING NOTES GENERAL NOTES: WALL FASTENED TO 2x6 STUDS 1. All framing shall be in compliance with Chapter 23 "Wood" of the Massachusetts State Building Code, Sixth Edition. 1'. All material and workmanship shall conform to the requirements of the 5th FLOOR 2. Unless otherwise noted, al/ lumber to be spruce - pine - fir No. 1/2 as Commonwealth of Massachusetts State Building Code, 6th Ed.. KEY PIAN NTS I — _-- _ _ _ __._I graded by the NLGA or better. The minimum structural properties are ds 2. Do not scale from the cans It the wohrketl ngineeesoslshown onrtheed ddrawngs does on is tnotocorrespond follows; 9 PROJECT T1TLE / ADDRESS _— _-_ _. __ __._ Modulus of Elasticity (E) = 1,400,000 psi with the existing field conditions, contact the engineer prior to Bending (Fb) = 875 psi proceeding with the work in question. r)M C 0 U LL, INC.�N C Ai Shear Parallel to Grain (Fv) = 70 psi 41. The contractor shall verify all dimensions, elevations and site conditions RUN SHEATING ONTO THE Compression Parallel to Grain (Fc) = 1100 psi prior to the start of construction. If there are any discrepancies, consult F.W. WEBB COMPANY EXISTING JOISTS 6" (MIN.) J. Pressure treated lumber shall be Southern Pine No. 1 or better. All lumber the engineer prior to proceeding with the work in question. SEE NOTE BELOW FOR to come in contact with concrete and masonry shall be pressure treated. 5. Where a construction detail is not shown or noted, the detail shall be the FASTENER INFORMATION. 4. Nailing patterns shall conform to Building Code or as indicated on the drawings. some as for other similar work. 5. All nails shall be common wire nails except as otherwise indicated. All 5. These drawings represent the finished structure and do not indicate the nails in pressure treated lumber shall be galvanized. method of construction. The contractor is responsible for all temporary 295 BRIDGE ST. 6. Cutting, notching or drilling of structural members shall be permitted only bracing, shoring and support necessary to achieve the finished structure. as detailed or approved by the engineer and/or per the Building Code. The contractor is responsible for determining and enforcing all construction SALEM, MA. 7. Plywood shall be APA rated sheathing and shall conform to Commercial load limits on the structure. Products Standard PS 1-95. 7. All sections and details marked typical or not referred to a specific PRol. No.: noel ST 8. All bolt heads and nuts bearing on wood shall have standard cut washers. location shall be considered typical for all similar conditions. 2 x 6's 0 16" O.C. All bolt holes in wood 'shall be drilled 1/32" diameter larger than normal tN tdq bolts diameters or as indicated on the drawings. SCALE: AS NOTE .tiP� ss9 9. Bolts in wood shall be not less than 7 diameters from the end and 4 �% 'a• H D 1 diameters from the edge of members. DESK. BY: WONt: S2 10. Top plates of all wood stud walls to be 2 - 2 x (same width as studs), 'I Sr CT 1/2" APA RATED SHEATHING. lapped 48" (minimum), with not less than 6 - 16d nails at each lap and not DRAWN BY: TJH p .205x1 O ti FASTEN TO THE STUDS WITH more than 12" between nails. ° fSTE4� 8d NAILS 0 4" O.C. ALONG 11. Do not splice members between supports without written approval of the CHED BY: ORO jCNAI��'\ PANEL EDGES AND 12" O.C. engineer. Finger jointed material is not acceptable without written approval ALONG INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS ISSUE DATE:3/31/06 12 go. x 2 1/2" Ig. SCREWS of the engineer. MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF THE SBEEi TITLE 8d NAILS. DBL. BOTTOM PLATE FASTEN TO EXISTING --•----••-- TEMPORARY DECKING W/16d NAILS SPACE NAILS 0 8" O.c STRUCTURAL REPAIRS 4th FLOOR STAGGERED Ii 2 6 x 12 JOISTS ° 3'-°" D.G. +/- (E, PARTIAL BUILDING SECTION W000 FLOOR DECKING (E) v/�*�A I♦�� F.W. trYaB l.VirlJ< DIRECTORY: 3081 FILE NAME: 3081-S2 Ca � 43y Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector before a permit will be granted. No. / City of Salem Ward IS PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT? Yes No_ w IF SIDING, HAS ELECTRICAL PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Yes No Home Phone # APPLICATION Bus. Phone # PERMIT TO ROO , REROOF R INSTALL SIDING a em,Mass., TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned herebv applies for a per to build according to the followin}P specifica[i99ns: Owner's name and address __ Flt/ W<�� _ �,� z>'�lg t p SA/Zn> Architect's name �— Mechanic's name and address _ iaf>i i oe>..� .Pow iwy �o.�/i /tiG RO4o d a 62 Location of building,No. 2 9r 41,4, tf. What is the purpose of building? z f/r--^T— _ Material of building? Asbestos? If a dwelling,for how many families Will the building conform to the requirements of the Is%,? >/ Estimated cost O Contra tors Lic.No. Signature of applicant REMARKS 51GNED UNDER THE Ae,ge>-; so�f>fr �- �no.ti �i�ri PENALTY OF PERJURY. No./ /�-% a Ward APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ROOF REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING Location PERMIT GRANTED 19 N ApprovedV d o ( Buildi6j Spector a� MOM COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS `G ? DErARTIM[ NT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS ' 600 WASHINGTON STREET —� BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02111 ;aures.: �anooe�' )W/O�RKFRRS, COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT (I kensev perm�neU with a principal place of business/residence at: 12 (CiryiSatciZip) do herebv certify, under the pains and penalties of perjury. that: ( ] I am an employer providine the following workers' compensation coverage for my employees working on this iob. Insurance Company Policy Number ( ] l am a sole proprietor and have no one working for me. ( J I am a sole proprietor, general contractor or homeowner (circle one) and have hired the contractors listed below who have the following workers' compensation insurance policies: Name of Contractor Insurance Company/Policv Number ------------ "ame of Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Number Name of Contractor Insurance Companv/Policy Number [] I am a homeowner performing all the work myself. NOTE: Plcase be aware that while bomeoween woo empioy'persom to do maintenance.construction or repair work on a dwelling of not more than three units to w6ieb the homeowner aiso resides or on the grounds appurtenant thereto am not generally considered to be empioven unser the WorkerCompem tuon Act(GL C. 152.sect. 1(5)), appncatson by a homeowner for a license or permit may rndeoce the legal sums of an employer uodcr the Workers Compensation Act. i understana that a copy of this statement will be forwarded to the Department of Industrial Accidents Office of insurance for coverage �cnncavon and that faiiure to secure coverage as reausred under Section 25A of MGL 152 can iead to the imposition of criminal penalties consisting of a fine of up to $1500.00 and/or imprisonment of up to one year and civil penaides in the form of a stop Work Order and a fine of s 100.00 a day against me. Signed this day of 241r' L , 19 icenseeipermirree LieensoriPermircor THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETA' ORDER ��� JYL 17 WETLANDS PROTECTI(*1 CT 04P�1 X81 G.L. C. 131 s.40 cir ReCely 4ee E FILE NUMBER: 64-82 IMASS. PROJECT LOCAION: 5 Bridge Street Salem, KA. TO: F. W. Bebb, Co.. Inc. CERT. MAIL NO: 295 Bridge Street, Salem, RE: NOTICE OF INTENT AND PLANS DATED: DATE OF RECEIPT BY 6-10-82 CONSERVATION COMMISSION: 6-30-82 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Pursuant to the authority of G.L. C. 131 s:40, the Salem Conservation Commission has concidered your notice of intent and plans submitted ' therewith, and has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to one or more of the interests described in the said act. The Salem Conservation Commission hereby orders that the :following conditions are necessary and all work must be performed in strict con- formance therewith: CONDITIONS 1. Failure to comply with all condition stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this order. 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private . rights. 3. This order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the neces- sity of complying with all other applicable federal,state,or local statutes, ordinances, by-laws and/or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of this order. The order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more additional one-year periods upon application to the said issuing authority at least thirty days prior to the expiration date of the order or its extension. 5. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, contain- ing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, lumber, bricks plaster,wire, lath, paper, card- board, pipe, tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 6. No work may be commenced untill all appeal periods have elapsed from the or- der of the Conservation Commission or from a final order by the Department of Natural Resources has elapsed. "Dn CONDITIONS CONTINUED, -> , .` 1.'�PAGE 2 r ' jFILE NO. 64-82 7. No work shall.' be undertaken until the final Order,% with respect to the proposed'project;' has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds for the district in,which the land is located: l„ Copy to be fur- nished to issuer of- this Order showing book and page , 8. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request, in writing, that a certificate of compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed, 9. A Sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Natural Resources, File Number.- 64-82 10. Where the Department of Natural Resources is requested to make a determination and to issue a superseding order, 1the Conservation Commission shall be the party to all agency proceedings and hear- ings before the Department of Natural Resources. 11, The work shall conform to the following described plans and additional conditions: The Commission has determined. that the work and the area is sig- nificant to storm damage prevention and issues the following addi- tional orders: a) All work shall conform to drawings entitled "New Freight Elevator, F. W. Webb Co . , Inc . , 295 Eridge Street, Salem, MA ." dated May 26, 1982 , Revised June 21, 1982. CONDITIONS CONTINUED PAGE 3 FILE NO. 64-82 The applicant, any Person aggrieved by this order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of. the City or Town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to appeal this order to the Department of Natural Resources, provided the request is made in writing and sent by certified mail to the Department of Natural Resources within ten (10) days from the issuance of this order. ISSUED BY Salem Conservation Commission / On this 22nd day of July 19 82 before me personally appeared the above-named persons to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. ^ , J Y (lX My commission expires : Y sl�ttutiitguarl (one �nlem Green Y REQUEST FOR REVIEW COMMENTS SPECIAL PEP14IT DATE: July 6, 1982 TO: ( ✓ ) Building Inspector ( ) Conservation Commission ( ) 'City Engineer ( ) Other: ( ) Board of Health qj Attached please find the application referenced below. The Planning Board requests that you review this application relative to Section VII of the Zoning Ordinance. We would appreciate your completing the form below and returning it to us. Notice of the public hearing for this application will be forwarded to you. WETLANDS & FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS ( ) CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: F. W. Webb Company PROJECT. NAKE & ADRESS: 295 Bridge Street construction of interior elevator CONTACT PERSONS AND PHONE. Applicant: - F. W. Webb 744-6550 City: Salem COMLIENTS DUE BY: August 5 , 1982 (Failure to comment within 35 days shall be deemed lack of opposition.) ( ",Concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Need more information (Explain on reverse side) ( ) Cannot concur with proposal (Explain on reverse side) Comments included REVIEWER'S SIGNATUPLE TITLff DATE CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS APPLICATION RECEIVED SPECIAL PERMIT '82 JUN 28 P2 :36 WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICTS CITY Cf Rn°c. „F,FiCF Applicant: v Address: zl � City Clerk Stamp Vii'" ,2'/�S 1 e'1.r, .$ Telephone' Owner: Address J7,7 Location of Property: S_ r ,, s >�,}�, 5 IA;7 Project Description: L,e°.,�/S"/,�'sc'-� ,.ef �t�6�C ��Sd� ✓L- 1. It has been determined by the Building Inspector that the above property lies in the following area(sj : A. Wetlands District Wetlands ( ) Buffer Zone ( ) i .. B. Flood Hazard District Zone A ( ) Zone A3 ('N( Zone V3 ( ) II. Information required includes this application and the following additional in£oraation ,(file one copy of everything with the City Clerk and five ,4" copies with the Planning Board ; all copies must be stamped by the City Clerk) : d A. A site plan at a scale of 1" equals 20' prepared by a registered land surveyor or registered professional engineer and showing at least the following: 1. Lot lines within which the development is proposed and the tie- in to the nearest road intersection; -4 2. ''The location, boundaries, and dimensions of each lot in question; 3. Two-foot contours of the existing and proposed land surface; 4. Location of existing and proposed structures, water-courses, drainage and drainage easements, means of access, utilities, and sewer disposal facilities including leaching fields, if any. Proposed elevations should be noted. 5. Boundaries of all districts, areas and zones as noted in Section I. ,d Y y -2- B. In the Wetlands District, a determination by a qualified engineer of the seasonal high water table, performed during the last two weeks of March or the first three weeks of April. A minimum of two percolation tests for each leaching area shall be performed. C. In cases of flood-proofing or pile construction, certification by a registered professional engineer or architect as to the elevation of flood-proofing measures and as to compliance with the applicable sections of the Massachusetts State Building Code concerned with flood depths, pressures, velocities, impact and uplift forces, and other factors associated with the base flood. Where specific methods or techniques have been previously certi- fied, the Planning Board may waive this requirement. D. A_ list of Federal, State, and other local permits required by the applicant. E. Descriptions relative to all conditions applicable in Section III below. III. Conditions (Complete those sections indicated (x) by the Building Inspector) In the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts no structure or building, including pipes and wells, shall be erected, constructed, substantially improved, enlarged, or otherwise created or moved; no area shall be paved; no earth or other material shaLl be stored, dumped, used as fill, excavated, or transferred; and no sediment shall be caused to be discharged from or onto a wetland, unless all the following condi- tions are found to exist as part of the granting of a Special Permit by the Planning Board (Use additional pages if necessary) : A. All Districts: (X) 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying District in which the land is located. Yes ✓ No (X) 2. There is adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedes- trian movement within the site, and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lot(s) caused by either overspill from water bodies or high runoff. -3- W 3. Utilities, including gas, electrictity, fuel, water, and sewage disposal, shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, shortcircuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. (Provide details) AN, (X) 4. The cumulative effect of the proposed development or use, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development and uses will not obstruct or divert flood flow; substantially reduce natural flood-water storage capacity in the local drainage area; destroy valuable habitat for wildlife including fisheries or shellfisheries; adversely affect groundwater resources or increase storm water run-off velocity so that water levels on other land are substantially raised or the danger from flooding increased. B. Wetlands District: ( ) 1. The proposed development or use shall not include the storage of salt, chemicals, petroleum products or other contandnating substances or discharge of any polluting liquids or materials into streams, brooks or wetlands. (The polluting effects of substances on the Wetlands are to be gauged by the "Rules and Regulations for the Establishment of Minimum Water Quality Standards and for the Protection of the Quality and Value of Water Resources" of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. ) �'a -4- ( ) 2. The floor level of areas to be occupied by human beings as living or work space shall be four (4) feet or more above the seasonal high water table. ( ) 3. If the basement floor level is below the seasonal high water table and affords the possibility of human occupancy at some future date, although not originally intended, adequate perimeter drainage and foundation shall be installed to with- stand the effect of pressure and seepage. Furnace and utilities are to be protected from the effects of leaching. (Provide details) Applies ( ) Does not Apply( ) ( ) 4. If the lot is to be served by an on lot septic system, the leaching area designed for use, as well as a reserved area for future expansion or total future use, shall be plotted with dimensions on the site plan, and the leaching areas shall not be constructed where the seasonal high water table is less than 4 feet below the bottom of the leaching areas. Applies ( ) See site plan Does not apply ( ) C. Flood Hazard District (all zones) : ( 1 1. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for residential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level. ( 2. The floor of the basement, or if none, the lowest floor of new construction or substantial improvement of structures for non- residential uses shall be at or above the 100 year flood level or the structures shall be flood-proofed to that level in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Flood-proofing measures shall insure that the structure is watertight and that structural components have the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of bouyancy. l�� -5- D. Flood Hazard District, Coastal High Hazard Area (Zone V3) : ( ) 1. New structures or substantial improvements shall be located landward of the reach of Mean High Tide. ( ) 2. New structures or substantial improvements shall be elevated on adequately anchorad pilings or columns, and securely anchored to such pilings or columns so that the lowest portion of the structural members of: the lowest floor (ex- cluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the 100 year flood level. Space below the lowest floor shall be free of fixed obstruction. (Provide details) ( ) 3. The support of new structures or substantial improvements shall not be, in whole or in part, by the use of fill. (Provide details) IV. Procedure The Planning Board shall, within 7 days after the filing of this application, transmit one copy of said application, plans and all other submitted information to the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer; Board of Health and Conservation Commission who may, at their discretion, investigate the application and report in writing their recommendation to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall not take final action on such application until it has received a report thereon from the Inspector of Buildings, City Engineer, Board of Health and Conservation Commission or until thirty-five (35) days have elapsed after dis- tribution of such application without a submission of a report. The Planning Board Shall hold a Public Hearing on said application as soon as possible after receiving the above reports, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. The Planning Board shall notify the applicant in writing of its decision on the special permit. The decision shall document the proposed development or use and the grounds for granting or refusing the special permit. The -6- Planning Board may, as a condition of approval, require that the appli- cant give effective notice to prospective purchasers, by signs or by recording the special permit at the Registry of Deeds, of the wet- land or flood hazard conditions associated with said premises and the steps undertaken by the petitioner or his successor in title to alleviate the effects of same. Signed Tit1 Date v d/. / ..:v.\ bo\\ y0 G \bo\ o ., '�` \ \ / is`K"/ \\ . ""y7►'So. 3 ..kE .`.3 Isoi. N �o--,w«.`�, U Pi 67 yrb \ yyS W LLS QLLJ v,r I 1 F♦ _ Y�" 2\ III ft CC VVP.�11tJGTON .f w 4 i F moi/ fJ;1 •1 � I_ V c I / alriii, C111c11Silr1l1t5i � 5 , \rte= F aUG �� 3►s P�1 9 _ 82 AUG 10 A11 :55 RECEIVED s0iir �zi1rm Gran CITY OF SAI.EIA,MAS CITY CLE°ID'S OFFICE SALEM I^s'- August 10 , 1982 SPECIAL PERMIT WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT F. W. WEBB COMPANY 295 Bridge Street Salem , Massachusetts OWNER: John D. Pope On Thursday, August 5 , 1982, the Planning Board of the City of Salem* held a public hearing regarding the application of F. W. Webb Company for a Special Permit under Section P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts , of the Salem Zoning Ordinance , with respect to the construction of an interior elevator at 295 Bridge Street, Salem , Massachusetts. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board on August 5 , 1982 , the Board voted , by a vote of five in favor, none opposed , to approve the application as complying with the requirements for the issuance of the permit with the following conditions: 1. That all work shall be done in accordance with plan entitled; "New Freight Elevator, F. W. Webb Co. , Inc. , 295 Bridge Street, Salem, Ma. " Project No. 119-81 , dated May 26; 1982 , and prepared by Ken Dennison Associates, Inc. , No. Reading, Ma. 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private/public property or any invasion of public/private rights . I here by certify that a copy of this decision has been filed with the City Clerk , and a copy is on file with the Planning Board. This Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed , and it has been dismissed or denied , is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. WALTER B. POWER, III Chairman, Planning Board WB P:jar John H. Carr, Jr., Esq. 2017 AUG " WPM9 North Street Salem, MA 01970 CITY CLERK Phone: 978-807-3264 SALEM MASS Fax: 978-825-0068 Email: johnhenrycarr@gmail.com August 11, 2017 By Hand Salem City Clerk Salem City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Federal Street Neighborhood Association, et al. v. Mark McLeod, et al. Essex Superior Court Civil Action No. 17-1191A. Dear Madam Clerk: Enclosed for filing please find the following documents: 1. Notice To Salem City Clerk Of Plaintiffs'Appeal To Essex Superior Court Of July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board Concerning 293 Bridge Street And 297 Bridge Street, Salem, Massachusetts (Salem Assessor's Map 26, Lots 634 and 635); 2. Copy of Complaint Pursuant To M.G.L. Chapter 40A, Section 17 Appealing The July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board Concerning 293 Bridge Street And 297 Bridge Street, Salem, Massachusetts (Salem Assessor's Map 26, Lots 634 and 635),including certified copy of said Decision ("Exhibit A")that was attached to said Complaint, bearing the above docket number of the Essex Superior Court. Would you or someone from your office kindly date-stamp and file same, and also acknowledge receipt of the foregoing by date-stamping my enclosed file copies of this cover letter and said Notice. Thank you in advance for your attention to the foregoing. truly ours John H. arr, Jr. { f COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION NO: 17-1191 A FEDERAL STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, ) VICTORIA ALLA, JAMES McALLISTER, JONATHAN L. ) FELT, SUZANNE R. FELT, T. JANE GRAHAM-DWYER, ) ERIC OLSON, MARIE OLSON, CONSTANCE ARLANDER, ) o_ STEVEN SASS, ELLEN GOLUB, JANE CURTIS ARLANDER, ) cn JEAN COLBY ARLANDER, JAMES E. GAULL, FREDERICK ) >--� , S. KOOPMAN, JAMES GWIN, JENNIFER LUCHT, ) M-< BARBARA CLEARY, DAVID HART, THOMAS FRARY, ) - c-.) SUSAN WELDON, JANE STAUFFER, ANN WHITTIER, ) y m = STEPHEN WHITTIER, MARY E. NUGENT, PETER NUGENT, ) (n= o DANIEL MADIGAN, CHARLES von BRUNS, FREDERICK C. BIEBESHEIMER IV, LISA A. SPENCE, JEREMIAH JENNINGS, DEBORAH JENNINGS, MARGARET K. S. - TWOHEY, and DARROW A. LEBOVICI, ) PLAINTIFFS ) V. ) MARK McLEOD, 295 BRIDGE STREET ASSOCIATES, and ) F. W. WEBB, INC., MATT VENO, HELEN SIDES, KIRT ) RIEDER, CAROLE HAMILTON, DALE YALE, BILL GRISET, ) NOAH KORETZ, BEN ANDERSON, and ANTONIO ) MATARAGAS, BEING THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY ) OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING BOARD, ) DEFENDANTS ) NOTICE TO SALEM CITY CLERK OF PLAINTIFFS' APPEAL TO ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT OF JULY 24,2017 FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT DECISION OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD CONCERNING 293 AND 297 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (SALEM ASSESSOR'S MAP 26, LOTS 634 and 635) 1, John H. Carr, Jr., attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action, hereby give notice to the City Clerk of the City of Salem, Massachusetts that said Plaintiffs have this day filed a civil Complaint with the Essex Superior Court appealing the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board concerning 293 Bridge Street and 297 Bridge Street, Salem, Massachusetts (Salem Assessor's Map 26, Lots 634 and 635), which two properties are located in a B-4 Zoning District. Said July 24, 2017 Salem Planning Board Special Pen-nit Decision being appealed was filed with the office of the Salem City Clerk at 11:38 a.m. on July 24, 2017. A copy of said Complaint appealing said Planning Board Special Permit Decision, which was filed this day with the Essex Superior Court as Civil Action No. 17-1191A, is attached hereto. The attached copy of said Complaint also includes a certified copy of said July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board Decision that was attached to said Complaint as Exhibit A. Federal StF80 Association, et al, By their August 11, 2017 John H.9 Nort tSalem(978) 07- COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION NO: I �I FEDERAL STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, ) VICTORIA ALLA, JAMES McALLISTER, JONATHAN L. ) FELT, SUZANNE R. FELT, T. JANE GRAHAM-DWYER, ) ERIC OLSON, MARIE OLSON, CONSTANCE ARLANDER, ) STEVEN SASS, ELLEN GOLUB, JANE CURTIS ARLANDER, ) JEAN COLBY ARLANDER, JAMES E. GAULL, FREDERICK ) S. KOOPMAN, JAMES GWIN, JENNIFER LUCHT, ) BARBARA CLEARY, DAVID HART, THOMAS FRARY, ) SUSAN WELDON, JANE STAUFFER, ANN WHITTIER, ) STEPHEN WHITTIER, MARY E. NUGENT, PETER NUGENT, ) DANIEL MADIGAN, CHARLES von BRUNS, FREDERICK C. ) BIEBESHEIMER IV, LISA A. SPENCE, JEREMIAH ) JENNINGS, DEBORAH JENNINGS, MARGARET K. S. ) TWOHEY, and DARROW A. LEBOVICI ) PLAINTIFFS ) V. ) MARK McLEOD, 295 BRIDGE STREET ASSOCIATES, and ) F. W. WEBB, INC., MATT VENO, HELEN SIDES, KIRT ) RIEDER, CAROLE HAMILTON, DALE YALE, BILL GRISET, ) NOAH KORETZ, BEN ANDERSON, and ANTONIO ) MATARAGAS, BEING THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY ) OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING BOARD, ) DEFENDANTS ) COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO M.G.L. CHAPTER 40A, SECTION 17 APPEALING THE JULY 24,2017 FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT DECISION OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD CONCERNING 293 AND 297 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS (SALEM ASSESSOR'S MAP 26, LOTS 634 and 635) This is an appeal from a Decision of the City of Salem, Massachusetts Planning Board (hereinafter "Salem Planning Board"or"Planning Board"), dated July 24, 2017 (hereinafter "Decision"or"Special Permit Decision"), and filed with the Salem, Massachusetts City Clerk on July 24, 2017, granting Mark McLeod a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to construct a 7,600 square foot free-standing 1 addition to the existing 5-story grandfathered structure located at 293 Bridge Street, Salem, Massachusetts (Assessor's Map 26, Lot 634), which lot is owned by 295 Bridge Street Associates, a wholly-owned subsidiary or affiliate of F. W. Webb, Inc., and also involving the adjacent lot at 297 Bridge Street, Salem, Massachusetts (Assessor's Map 26, Lot 635), currently a municipal parking lot owned and operated by the City of Salem, which two lots are currently located in a B-4 Zoning District, on the grounds that said Decision was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, violated due process, exceeded the Planning Board's authority, was based on legally and factually untenable grounds, and was wrong as a matter of law. A certified copy of said July 24, 2017 Special Permit Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit A. PARTIES Plaintiffs 1. Plaintiff Federal Street Neighborhood Association (hereinafter"FSNA") is a 501(c)(3) corporation whose corporate address is c/o 20 Beckford Street, Salem, Massachusetts and which is dedicated to the improvement,preservation, and protection of the Federal Street Neighborhood (defined as the roughly rectangular area bounded by Essex Street to the south, Bridge Street to the north, North Street to the east, and Boston Street to the west, specifically including Federal Court, Beckford Street, Andover Street, River Street, Lynn Street, Monroe Street, Carpenter Street, Flint Street, and Harrington Court). 2. Plaintiff Victoria Alla owns and resides at 78 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 3. Plaintiff James McAllister resides at 86 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is a direct abutter to the Webb Lot. 4. Plaintiffs, Jonathan L. Felt and Suzanne R. Felt, reside at 31 Flint Street, Salem, Massachusetts and own 86 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is a direct abutter to the Webb Lot. 5. Plaintiff, T. Jane Graham-Dwyer, owns and resides at 89 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 6. Plaintiffs, Eric Olson and Marie Olson, own and reside at 3 Federal Street Court, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within 300 feet(approximately) of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 7. Plaintiff, Constance Arlander, owns and resides at 91 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 2 8. Plaintiffs, Steven Sass and Ellen Golub, own 92 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property directly abuts one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 9. Plaintiff, Jane Curtis Arlander, owns and resides at 93 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 10. Plaintiff, Jean Colby Arlander, owns and resides at 93 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 11. Plaintiff, James E. Gaull, owns 94 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property directly abuts one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 12. Plaintiff, Frederick S. Koopman, owns and resides at 102 Federal Street, unit#3, Salem, Massachusetts, which property directly abuts one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 13. Plaintiffs, James Gwin and Jennifer Lucht, own and reside at 103 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 14. Plaintiffs, Barbara Cleary and David Hart, own and reside at 104 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter to one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 15. Plaintiffs, Thomas Frary and Susan Weldon, own and reside at 106 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is within 300 feet of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 16. Plaintiff, Jane Stauffer, owns and resides at 28 Beckford Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is an abutter to an abutter of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 17. Plaintiffs, Ann Whittier and Stephen Whittier, own and reside at 10 River Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within 300 feet(approximately) of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 18. Plaintiffs, Mary E. Nugent and Peter Nugent, own 12 River Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within 300 feet (approximately) of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 19. Plaintiff, Daniel Madigan, owns and resides at 14 River Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within 300 feet (approximately)of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 3 20. Plaintiff, Charles von Bruns, owns and resides at 3 River Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within approximately 300 feet of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 21. Plaintiffs, Frederick C. Biebesheimer, owns, and he and his wife, Lisa A. Spence,reside at 17'/2 River Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within approximately 300 feet of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. Mr. Biebesheimer is also President of FSNA. 22. Plaintiffs, Jeremiah Jennings and Deborah Jennings, own and reside at 18 River Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which property is located within approximately 300 feet of one or both of the Webb and Universal Lots. 23. Plaintiffs, Margaret K. S. Twohey and Darrow A. Lebovici, own and reside at 122 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, and also own 120 Federal Street, Salem, Massachusetts, which properties are directly affected by the traffic and flooding issues hereinafter described. Defendants 24. Defendant, Mark McLeod (hereinafter"McLeod" or"Applicant"or"Defendant McLeod"), is the Applicant and beneficiary of the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision herewith being appealed, and is believed to be an agent of 295 Bridge Street Associates or of F. W. Webb, Inc. On information and belief, Mr. McLeod's business address is c/o The H. L. Turner Group Inc., 27 Locke Road, Concord,New Hampshire 03301. 25. Defendant, 295 Bridge Street Associates (hereinafter"BSA") is believed to be a wholly- owned real estate subsidiary or affiliate of F. W. Webb, Inc. which owns Webb's local Salem retail/wholesale outlet at 293 Bridge Street. On information and belief, BSA shares the same corporate headquarters at 160 Middlesex Turnpike, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, as does F. W. Webb, Inc. 26. Defendant, Defendant, F. W. Webb Company, Inc. (hereinafter"Webb") is believed to be a family-owned Massachusetts corporation whose headquarters is located at 160 Middlesex Turnpike, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730 which owns, directly or indirectly, its local Salem retail/wholesale outlet located at 291-295 Bridge Street, Salem, Massachusetts ("Webb Lot"). Webb is believed to do business at approximately 80 retail or wholesale locations from Maine to Pennsylvania which are believed to generate gross annual sales in excess of one billion ($1,000,000,000.00) dollars. 27. Defendant, Matt Veno, a/k/a Matthew Veno, who resides at 20 Forest Avenue 43, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member and the Vice Chair of the Salem Planning Board who on July 20, 2017 voted in favor of what became the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. 4 28. Defendant, Helen Sides, who resides at 35 Broad Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who on July 20, 2017 voted in favor of what became the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. 29. Defendant, Kirt Rieder, who resides at 15 Warren Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who on July 20, 2017 voted in favor of what became the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. 30. Defendant, Carole Hamilton, who resides at 4 Willow Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who was absent on July 20, 2017 and thus, did not vote on Defendant McLeod's Application for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. 31. Defendant, Dale Yale, who resides at 7 Mayflower Lane, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who on July 20, 2017 voted in favor of what became the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. 32. Defendant, Bill Griset, who resides at 153 Fort Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who on July 20, 2017 voted in favor of what became the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. 33. Defendant,Noah Koretz, who resides at 10 Woodside Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who left the July 20, 2017 Salem Planning Board hearing early and thus, did not vote on Defendant McLeod's Application for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. 34. Defendant, Ben Anderson, who resides at 10 Adams Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member and the Chair of the Salem Planning Board who on July 20, 2017 voted in favor of what became the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. 35. Defendant,Antonio Mataragas, who resides at 19 Pickman Road, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, is a regular member of the Salem Planning Board who was absent on July 20, 2017 and thus, did not vote on Defendant McLeod's Application for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. 36. The Plaintiffs have standing to bring this action, as they are substantially aggrieved by the July 24, 2017 Decision of the Salem Planning Board being appealed. JURISDICTION 5 37. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. 38. This case is timely, as it has been filed within twenty(20) days from July 24, 2017, which is when the July 24, 2017 Decision of the Salem Planning Board was filed with the Salem City Clerk. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 39. On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 Defendant McLeod filed an Application with the Salem Department of Planning& Community Development seeking from the Salem Planning Board a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 40. At 3:25 p.m. that same day a duplicate of said Application was filed with the Salem City Clerk's office. 41. Said Application listed as the "Applicant: Mark McLeod c/o The H.L. Turner Group Inc." of 27 Locke Road, Concord,NH 03301 and "295 Bridge Street Associates c/o FW Webb Co."as the "Owner"of both"293 & 297 Bridge St (Map& Lot: 26-634 & 26-635)," whereas the City of Salem is in fact the owner of 297 Bridge Street (Map 26-Lot 635). 42. According to the "Project Description" in Section I of said Application: "The FW Webb Co. is proposing to construct a 7,600 sf addition to their existing facility at 293 Bridge St. Additionally, the adjacent lot, currently a municipal parking lot, will be used for employee and customer parking, tractor trailer access to the loading docks, and exterior storage for products (such as plastic and cast iron piping.)" 43. Both the Universal Lot and the Webb Lot are currently located in a B-4 Zoning District. 44. Prior to the rezoning of both 293 Bridge Street (the existing Webb Lot) and the adjacent so- called Universal Lot at 297 Bridge Street, both in late November of 2016, the Webb Lot was located in the so-called North River Canal Corridor("NRCC")Zoning District and the Universal Lot was located in a Two-Family Residential ("R-2") Zoning District. 45. On November 28, 2016 one institutional and seventy-seven(77) individual plaintiffs filed suit in this Court in a 41-page, 8-Count, 377-paragraph Complaint challenging the validity of said rezoning. See Federal Street Neighborhood Association, et al. v. Mayor Kimberley Driscoll, et al., dated November 28, 2016, Essex Superior Court Civil Action No. 16- 1537D. 46. Notwithstanding said rezoning, Webb still needed major zoning relief to pursue its proposed development of the Webb and Universal Lots. 47. At 11:40 a.m. on Wednesday, March 29, 2017 295 Bridge Street Associates ("BSA"), a wholly-owned real estate subsidiary or affiliate of Webb, filed a Petition with the Salem 6 Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") seeking a Variance from Section 5.1.5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to create 3 entrance and exit drives of 67 feet, 35 feet, and 53 feet at the Universal Lot, in each case more than the 30 foot maximum allowed in a B-4 Zoning District, and a Special Permit pursuant to Section 3.3.3 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance "to extend a non-conforming structure (7,600+/- s.f. addition)"relative to its existing Webb Lot and grandfathered non-conforming 5-story structure. 48. On May 17, 2017 the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals voted to grant a Variance and Special Permit to permit BSA to construct a 7,600 square foot, free-standing addition to its existing 5-story, grandfathered structure located at 293 Bridge Street, and to increase by more than double the 30-foot wide maximum curb cut permitted in a B-4 Zoning District pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance in connection with the Universal Lot. 49. On Friday, June 16, 2017 one institutional and thirty-two (32) individual plaintiffs filed suit in this Court challenging the validity of said Variance and Special Permit. See Federal Street Neighborhood Association, et al. v. 295 Bridge Street Associates, et al., dated June 16, 2017, Essex Superior Court Civil Action No. 17-889B. 50. Both the Webb Lot and the immediately adjacent Universal Lot(to the west)are bounded on the south, east, and west by the so-called McIntire Historic District established pursuant to Chapter 40C of the Massachusetts General Laws, which District basically extends from Bridge Street to the North,North Street to the east, Broad Street to the south, and Boston Street to the west, and includes Federal Street, Essex Street, Chestnut Street,parts of Broad Street, parts of Summer Street, Federal Court, Beckford Street, River Street,Andover Street, Lynn Street, Munroe Street, Gifford Court, Flint Street, Harrington Court, Cambridge Street, Botts Court, Hamilton Street, North Pine Street, South Pine Street, Pickering Street, and Warren Street. 51. Said District is also separately listed on the National Register of Historic Places designated by the United States Department of the Interior. 52. Aside from Chestnut Street, which is zoned single-family ("R-1") residential, the rest of the McIntire Historic District is uniformly zoned two-family ("R-2")residential. 53. The Webb and Universal Lots are also bounded on the north by a 4,003-acre linear park known as Leslie's Retreat Park, stretching 2,236 feet along the northern side of Bridge Street from the North Street Overpass in the east to Flint Street in the west, which was completed in 1999 at a cost to taxpayers of approximately Four Million($4,000,000.00) Dollars as part of the so-called Salem Beverly Transportation Project, 90% of which was underwritten by the United States Federal Highway Administration. 54. As a result of the former use of the so-called Universal Lot at 297 Bridge Street by the now defunct Universal Steel & Trading Company (hereinafter"Universal"), which operated a scrap metal and junk yard at that location for over 60 years,the Universal Lot is one of, if not the, most polluted lots in the City. The City of Salem acquired title to the property pursuant to a tax taking dated October 7, 2005. 7 55. The Universal Lot was cleaned up by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") in 2012 (to the limited standard required for a parking lot) at a total cost to federal and state taxpayers of Three and One Half Million ($3,500,000.00) Dollars. 56. The Universal Lot is still heavily contaminated below a depth of approximately four feet. 57. Since the completion of the EPA clean-up,the City has been using the Universal Lot as a 112-space municipal parking lot. 58. In the 5 weekends leading up to Halloween, the Universal Lot tends to be full on both Saturdays and Sundays. In recent weeks the Universal Lot averages 35 to 60 cars during weekdays. 59. Both the Webb Lot and the Universal Lot are located entirely within a FEMA (National) Hazardous Flood Zone. 60. On an average of approximately once every four to six weeks, Bridge Street between the intersection of River and Lynn Streets in the west, and the Webb Lot in the east, seriously floods twice a day. 61. Such serious and frequent flooding, which periodically occurs irrespective of whether the sun is shining or whether it is raining, is the product of tidal surges that back up through the storm drains along that portion of Bridge Street that connect to the present North River Canal, exacerbated by the fact that Bridge Street at that location is low-lying within said Flood Plain. 62. During periods of severe flooding occurring during flood tides, it is not uncommon that Commercial Street to the north of the present North River Canal is completely under water, as is that portion of the Leslie's Retreat Park, and Bridge Street between the intersection of River and Lynn Streets in the west, and the Webb Lot in the east, often to a depth of approximately one foot. 63. The northerly side of Bridge Street between Lynn Street and the Webb Lot has signs on three utility poles warning westbound motorists to use "Caution"because of"Flood Zone During Unusually High Tides," and the southerly side of Bridge Street between Lynn Street and the Webb Lot has signs on two utility poles warning eastbound motorists to use "Caution"because of"Flood Zone During Unusually High Tides." 64. On July 10, 2017 a 10 Citizen Appeal was filed with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ("Mass DEP")pursuant to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. 65. Basically, said 10 Citizen Appeal challenged an Order of Conditions issued by the Salem Conservation Commission as being inadequate to meet the safeguards mandated by the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. 8 66. The Mass. DEP has accepted said appeal and a site visit has been scheduled for August 17, 2017 in preparation for writing a Superseding Order Of Conditions by the Mass. DEP. 67. On November 14, 2016, the City conducted a public auction for the sale of the Universal Lot. 68. Webb is a family-owned business with 80 retail/wholesale or distribution locations between Maine and Pennsylvania(26 in Massachusetts). On information and belief, Webb had over One Billion($1,000,000,000.00) Dollars of gross annual sales in 2015 alone. 69. BSA, a wholly-owned real estate subsidiary or affiliate of Webb, was the sole bidder at the public auction of the Universal Lot. Its bid of$498,550.00 represented approximately one seventh of the $3,500,000.00 cost that federal and state taxpayers paid in 2012 to partially clean up the site and create the parking lot. 70. BSA has a conditional purchase and sales agreement with the City of Salem to purchase the Universal Lot once all appeals are resolved to BSA's satisfaction. 71. An initial hearing on Defendant McLeod's May 24, 2017 Application for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit was held by the Salem Planning Board on Thursday, July 6, 2017. 72. According to the official Minutes of said July 6, 2017 initial hearing, "Chair Ben Anderson, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset [sic], Matt Veno, and Carole Hamilton were present." Absent were "Bill Griset [sic] and Noah Koretz." Emphasis added. 73. At the second of the two Salem Planning Board hearings on Thursday, July 20, 2017 Chair Ben Anderson, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matt Veno, and Helen Sides voted to approve Defendant McLeod's May 24, 2017 Application for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. 74. At both the first and second Planning Board hearings on July 6, 2017 and July 20, 2017 respectively, no one from the public spoke in support of McLeod's May 24, 2017 Application. 75. At the conclusion of the second of the two Planning Board hearings on July 20, 2017, approximately 15 people appeared in opposition, of whom multiple people spoke in opposition. 76. At the second of the two Salem Planning Board hearings on Thursday, July 20, 2017, Chair Ben Anderson, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matt Veno, and Helen Sides voted to approve Defendant McLeod's May 24, 2017 Application for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. 77. Said six votes constituted the bare minimum required for passage of said Application. 9 78. The resulting July 24, 2017 Planning Board Decision was filed in the office of the Salem City Clerk at 11:38 a.m. on Monday, July 24, 2017. 79. As to each of the following Counts, the Plaintiffs reaffirm, re-allege, and incorporate all of the prior allegations contained in paragraphs 1-78 above. ARGUMENT COUNTI THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD'S JULY 24,2017 DECISION VIOLATES THE EXPLICIT PURPOSES OF THE SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE AND CHAPTER 40A 80. Section 1.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, entitled "Purpose,"provides following in relevant part: For the purpose of promoting the health, safety, convenience, morals or welfare of the inhabitants of Salem, the zoning regulations and restrictions of this ordinance, ordained in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 40A of the General Laws and, in the case of signs, ordained in addition in accord with the provisions of Section 29 of Chapter 93 of the General Laws. are designed among other purposes to lessen congestion in the streets; to preserve health; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation. water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; to conserve the value of land and buildings; to encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and to preserve and increase its amenities. to preserve and protect the water supply, open space and conservation of natural resources, to prevent the pollution of the environment and community blight, to ensure housing for all income levels and compliance with the master plan of the City of Salem; all as authorized by, but not limited to, the provisions of the Zoning Act, G.L. c. 40A. as amended, Section 2A of 1975 Mass. Acts 808, and by Article 89 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Emphasis added. 81. In particular, the Planning Board's July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision does not preserve and protect the water supply...and conservation of natural resources and it does not prevent the pollution of the environment. 82. Nor does said Decision comply with other express provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, including lessening congestion in the streets: preserving health. securing 10 safety from...other dangers; conserving the value of land and buildings; encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and preserving and increasing its amenities. 83. Accordingly, said Decision does not comply with the Master Plan of the City of Salem. 84. For the foregoing reasons alone,the Planning Board exceeded its authority in granting said Special Permit and the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision must be annulled in its entirety. COUNT II THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD'S JULY 24,2017 SPECIAL PERMIT DECISION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION 8.1.4 OF THE SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT COMPLY IN ALL RESPECTS WITH THE USES AND PROVISIONS OF THE UNDERLYING B-4 ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH THE LAND IS LOCATED WITH RESPECT TO CURB CUTS ALONE 85. Section 8.1.4 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance provides in relevant part that"No structure or building including pipes shall be constructed, erected, improved, enlarged, moved unless the following conditions are found to exist: 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. Emphasis added. 86. Pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, the maximum width of a curb cut in a B-4 Zoning District is 30 feet. 87. Webb's project calls for a new 67-foot curb cut at the Universal Lot pursuant to the Variance granted by the Salem ZBA in its May 31, 2017 Variance and Special Permit Decision now under appeal in this Court. See Federal Street Neighborhood Association, et al. v. 295 Bridge Street Associates, et al., dated June 16, 2017, Essex Superior Court Civil Action No. 17-889B. 88. Said new 67-foot curb cut is more than double the maximum curb cut permitted by the Salem Zoning Ordinance in a B-4 Zoning District. 89. The Salem City Solicitor failed to address this legal defect in her July 20, 2017 legal opinion letter to the Salem Planning Board. 90. Nowhere in the Salem Zoning Ordinance is there any language to the effect that the requirement that the proposed project must comply in all respects with the provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located is superseded or modified by any Variance or Special Permit that may be granted modifying said provisions. 11 91. And yet, Finding No. 1 in said July 24, 2017 Special Permit Decision is a masterpiece in self-serving, circular, and factually untrue reasoning, when it simply states in unsupported conclusionary terms that "The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located." 92. Simply regurgitating the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance is NOT a legally competent factual finding. 93. The same defect is also true with respect to Finding No. 2 as well. 94. For the foregoing reasons alone,the Planning Board exceeded its authority in granting said Special Permit and the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision must be annulled in its entirety. COUNT III THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD'S JULY 24,2017 DECISION ALSO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION 8.1.4 OF THE SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT MAKE ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR THE CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY OF VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT WITHIN THE SITE AND IN RELATION TO ADJACENT STREETS AND PROPERTY, PARTICULARLY IN THE EVENT OF FLOODING OF THE LOT OR ADJACENT LOTS BY EITHER OVERSPILL FROM WATERBODIES OR HIGH RUNNOFF. 95. As correctly noted in the first paragraph of the City Solicitor's July 20, 2017 legal opinion letter to the Salem Planning Board, Section 8.1.4 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance requires that four conditions must be met before the Planning Board can issue a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, including that the project has "adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lot(s) caused by either overspill from waterbodies or high runoff." Emphasis added. 96. In her July 20, 2017 legal opinion letter to the Salem Planning Board, the City Solicitor assured the Planning Board that it could find that Webb/McLeod's Application met the requirements of Section 8.1.4 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance because the project(in her stated opinion)makes adequate provision for the convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property because: "1) When flooding takes place on the public street, it is closed to traffic; 2) flooding moves from the street onto the FW Webb lot over time which affords ample time for customers or employees to move their cars and 3) pedestrians can use the ancient [Beckford pedestrian] way up to Beckford Street to avoid any flooding." 12 Emphasis added. 97. With respect to pedestrian movement in reason no. 3 alone, the so-called "ancient way" is a narrow, steep, unpaved, and rock-strewn pedestrian way that is certainly not handicap accessible and which basically connects the grade of Bridge Street with the grade of Beckford and River Streets approximately thirty (30) feet above. 98. The Bridge Street grade of the pedestrian way is subject to the very same flooding as is Bridge Street and the Universal Lot, thus absolutely precluding it from serving as a safe pedestrian egress solution. 99. Among the City Solicitor's recommended Special Permit conditions that the Planning Board should adopt relative to her reason no. 3, perhaps the most fatuous is that Webb should "implement a policy/practice...to make employees aware of the ancient path to Beckford Street." 100.As such, reason no. 3 does not represent any provision, let alone adequate provision, for pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property. 101.With respect to vehicular movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property during periods of severe flooding on Bridge Street, east-bound traffic (including large tractor trailer trucks and other commercial vehicles)tends to react to the flooding by turning south onto Lynn Street, and west-bound traffic (also including large tractor trailer trucks and other commercial vehicles) tends to detour by turning south up the North Street Overpass ramp to Federal Street. 102.In both instances, such traffic then has to thread its way through the relatively narrow and historic streets of the National Register and local Historic District, which is uniformly R-2 residential. 103.Said historic residential neighborhood contains many families with young children whose safety is threatened by said vehicular incursions onto their narrow streets. 104.The City Solicitor recommended to the Planning Board that "perhaps the Board should consider conditions requiring FW Webb to monitor the tidal flow into the street, block access to their site when flooding is imminent or beginning in the street, implement a policy/practice to insure employees' vehicles are offsite when flooding is imminent..." 105.The City Solicitor's recommended conditions are woefully inadequate and make a mockery of the content and purposes of Section 8.1.4 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 106. For the foregoing reasons alone, the Planning Board exceeded its authority in granting said Special Permit and the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision must be annulled in its entirety. COUNT IV 13 THE SALEM CITY SOLICITOR' JULY 20,2017 OPINION LETTER TO THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD ALLUDES TO UNSPECIFIED FLOODING IMPROVEMENTS THAT APPARENTLY HAVE NO BASIS IN FACT,AND EVEN IF TRUE, SHOULD HAVE BEEN FULLY AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLOSED TO THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD PRIOR TO ITS JULY 20,2017 VOTE. 107.In her July 20, 2017 legal opinion letter to the Salem Planning Board, the City Solicitor wrote: "The most important fact I learned from the [Salem City] Engineer today, though, is that within two weeks, tide gates will be installed in the drain lines leading into the North River adjacent to the FW Webb site. This installation is part of the City's ongoing flood mitigation efforts and when installed will reduce the occasional flooding on bridge Street. As a result, in my opinion, the Board could find that based on all of these factors there is adequate convenience and safety for vehicles and pedestrians." Emphasis added. 108.The details of said purported tide gates, their installation and what is hoped they will accomplish, were immediately requested orally, and subsequently requested in writing, by representatives of the Plaintiffs. 109.Twenty-one days after the July 20, 2017 Planning Board hearing they still have not been forthcoming. 110.Even if said purported tide gates are in fact genuine elements of the City's "ongoing flood mitigation efforts,"the City Solicitor's self-serving and conclusionary statement is hardly a satisfactory or legitimate substitute for the Planning Board's legal responsibility to make competent decisions based on empirical facts. 111.After all, had only one Planning Board Member voted differently on July 20, 2017, Webb/Mcleod's Application would have failed. 112.At a minimum, the Planning Board should have insisted on getting the details of what the City Solicitor was referring to as "the most important fact" she learned from the Salem City Engineer earlier in the day of the Planning Board vote on the evening of Thursday, July 20, 2017, even assuming said assertions were true. 113.For the foregoing reasons alone, the Planning Board exceeded its authority in granting said Special Permit and the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision must be annulled in its entirety. COUNT V THERE ARE NO LEGALLY COMPETANT FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE PLANNING BOARD'S JULY 24, 2017 FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY 14 DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT DECISION ON THE KEY ISSUES OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT 114.Finding No. 1 in said July 24, 2017 Special Permit Decision is a masterpiece in self- serving, circular, and factually untrue reasoning, when it simply states in unsupported conclusionary terms that "The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. 115.Simply regurgitating the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance is NOT a legally competent factual finding. 116.The same defect is also true with respect to Finding No. 2 as well 117.For the foregoing reasons alone, the Planning Board exceeded its authority in granting said Special Permit and the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision must be annulled in its entirety. COUNT VI THE PLAINTIFFS ARE SUBSTANTIALLY AGGRIEVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD'S JULY 24, 2017 FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT DECISION 118.The Plaintiffs have relied on the Salem Zoning Ordinance to protect their property values, their safety, and the enjoyment of their respective properties and their neighborhood. 119.The July 24, 2017 ZBA Decision adversely undermines their property values, their safety, their enjoyment of their properties, and the zoning integrity of their neighborhood. 120.For the foregoing reasons alone, the Planning Board exceeded its authority in granting said Special Permit and the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision must be annulled in its entirety. RELIEF SOUGHT The Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court: a. Enter Judgment in their favor annulling in full the July 24, 2017 Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision of the Salem Planning Board; b. Award the Plaintiffs cost and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in connection with their prosecution of this appeal; and c. Grant such other relief as is just and expedient. 15 Respectfully s , Fed reet Nei hborhood Association, et al, their att August 11, 2017 John H. C , 9 North et Salem A 01970 (978 07-3264 BBO# 07528 16 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1#17 A 24 � 38 SALEM, M,q$S Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision July 24, 2017 On Thursday, July 6, 2017, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 for the site located at 293 Bridge Street and 297 Bridge Street (Map 26, Lots 634 and 635) to construct a 7,600 square foot addition to the existing building on the property located at 293 Bridge Street. The adjacent lot, 297 Bridge Street, currently a municipal parking lot, will be used for employee and customer parking, tractor trailer access, and exterior storage for products. The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the Flood Hazard District Special Permit Application: 1. The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. 2. There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s)or adjacent lot(s) caused by either overspill from water bodies or high runoff. 3. Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel, water and sewage disposal, will be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, short-circuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. The public hearing was continued to July 20, 2017, and closed at the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on July 20, 2017. Based upon the plans submitted and evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board voted by a vote of six (6) in favor (Ben Anderson, Matt Veno, Kirt Rieder,Dale Yale, Helen Sides and Bill Griset) and none(0) opposed, to approve the application of the H.L. Turner Group Inc. for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan a. Work shall conform with the set of plans entitled, "Green Leaf Construction F.W. Webb Company Addition," prepared by the H.L. Turner Group Inc. Sheets CO.1, C 1.0, C 1.1, C2.0, C3.0, C4.0, C5.0, C6.0, C6.1, C6.2, TEC1, and TEC2 dated May 18, 2017 and revised June 7, 2017, and sheet L.1 dated June 15, 2017. 1 rV ' 2. Amendments a. Any amendments to the approved plans referenced in La. shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Site Specific Conditions a. Electrical utilities in the existing building shall be moved above the floodplain prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. The applicant shall implement a policy to ensure that employees: i. Monitor tidal flow into the street, ii. Block access to the site when flooding is imminent or beginning in the street, and iii. Ensure employees' vehicles are offsite when flooding is imminent and make employees aware of the ancient path on Beckford Street. c. The policy described in Condition 3.b(i-iii) shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 4. Board of Health a. All Board of Health requirements shall be strictly adhered to. 5. Fire Department a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 6. Building Inspector a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector. 7. City Engineer a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. 8. Construction Practices a. All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: i. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. ii. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. iii. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. iv. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. V. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. 2 • vi. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site must be located completely on the site. vii. All construction will occur on site; no construction will occur or be staged within City right of way. Any deviation from this shall be approved by the City Planner prior to construction. viii. Any roadways, driveways, sidewalks, or landscaping damaged during construction shall be restored to their original condition by the applicant. 9. As-built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Engineering Department prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Violations a. Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record and/or is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Ben J. Anderson Chairman A TRUE COPY ATTEST 0- cz City CLERK SALEM MASS. 3 3 8 L4-5C)1 r2- BEGEIVED W The Commonwealth of l� N s Department of Public Safety t��1 Massachusetts State Building CoMW6. µ4 2 Ali: 29 Building Permit Application for any Building other than a One-or Two-Family Dwelling (This Section For Official Use Only) Building Permit Number: Date Applied: Building Official: y� SECTION 1:LOCATION(Please indicate Block#and Lot#for locations for which a street address is not available) �1 e - No.and Street - -City/Town - Zip Code Name of Building(if applicable) ( ^ ' SECTION 2:'PROPOSED WORK - � ) Edition of MA State Code used_ If New Construction check here❑or check all that apply in the two rows below 1 Existing Building❑ Repair Wf Alteration ❑ Addition❑ Demolition ❑ (Please fill out and submit Appendix 1) Change of Use ❑ Change of Occupancy ❑ Other ❑ Specify: Xle d Are building plans and/or construction documents being supplied as part of this permit application? Yes No Is an Independent Structural Engineerfn Peer Revie requ' ed. Yes ❑ No Brief De cnption 9f Pro ork: C/ O � / AdAl oArw !.� /' sv of J SECTION 3:COMPLETE THIS SECTION IF EXISTING BUILDING UNDERGOING RENOVATION,ADDITION,OR CHANGE IN USE OR OCCUPANCY Check here if an Existing Building Investigation and Evaluation is enclosed(See 780 CMR 34) 0 Existing Use Group(s): Proposed Use Group(s): SECTION 4:BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA Existing Proposed No.of Floors/Stories(include basement levels)&Area Per Floor(sq.ft.) Total Area(sq.ft.)and Total Height(ft.) SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) A: Assembly A-1 ❑ A-2❑ Nightclub ❑ A-3 ❑ A-4�❑ A-5❑ B: Business ❑ E: Educational ❑ F: Facto F-1 ❑ F2❑ H: High Hazard H-1❑ H-2❑ H-3 ❑ H4❑ H-5❑ I: Institutional I-1❑ I-2❑ I-3❑ I-4❑ M: Mercantile❑ R: Residential R-10 R-2❑ R-3❑ RA❑ S: Storage S-1 ❑ S-2❑ U: Utility❑ Special Use❑and please describe below: Special Use: SECTION 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPE(Check as applicable) IAO IBD IIAO HBO HIAD IIIB13 1 IV I VA13 VBO SECTION 7:SITE INFORMATION(refer to 780 CMR 111.0 for details on each item) Water Supply: Flood Zone Information: Sewage Disposal: Trench Permit: Debris Removal: Public❑ Check if outside Flood Zone❑ Indicate municipal❑ A trench will not be Licensed Disposal Site❑ Private❑ or indentify Zone: or on site system❑ required❑or trench or specify: permit is enclosed❑ Railroad right-of-way: Hazards to Air Navigation: MA Historic Commission Review Process: Not Applicable❑ Is Structure within airport approach area? Is their review completed? or Consent to Build enclosed❑ Yes❑ or No❑ Yes❑ No ❑ SECTION 8:CONTENT OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Edition of Code: Use Group(s): Type of Construction: Occupant Load per Floor: Does the building contain an Sprinkler System?: Special Stipulations: Attie t l 30 to 4 P,U, SECTION 9: PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION Name and Address of Property Owner Name(Print) No.and Street City/Town Zip Property Owner Contact Information: Title Telephone No.(business) Telephone No. (cell) e-mail address If applicable,the property.owner hereby authorizes Name Street Address City/Town State Zip to act on the property owner's behalf,in all matters relative to work authorized by this budding permit application. SECTION 10:CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fill out Appendix 2) If building is legs than 35,000 cu.ft.of enclosed-s ace and/or not under Construction Control then check here O and skip Section 10.1)I " 10.1 Registered Professional Responsible for Construction Control Name(Registrant) Telephone No. e-mail address Registration Number Street Address City/Town State Zip Discipline Expiration Date 10.2 General Contractor �?eaA MatK OX e Company Name TAWiD A4aL�— �5 2'3 Name of Person Res onsible or Construction License No. and Type if Applicable «/ �,� �, 1� Street Address City/Town State Zip 69-m— -33" 2&0, Jain 9 �L-1,6w il"w"e, (b>+7 Telephone No.(business) Telephone No. cell e-mail address SECTION 11:WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT(M.G.L.c.152.§25C(6)) j A Workers'Compensation Insurance Affidavit from the MA Department of Industrial Accidents must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the i ante of the building permit. Is a signed Affidavit submitted with this application? Yes 17 No O SECTION 12:CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PERMIT FEE Item Estimated Costs:(Labor A and Materials) Total Construction Cost(from Item 6)=$ y , 1.Building $ Building Permit Fee=Total Construction Cost x L(Insert here 2.Electrical $ appropriate municipal factor) 3.Plumbing $ 4.Mechanical (HVAC) $ Note:Minimum fee=$ (contact municipality) 5.Mechanical Other $ ' able to La Enclose check payable rA)q d 7 Apl&A 6.Total Cost $ e— (�� (contact municipality)and write check number here SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT By entering my name below,I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the information contained in this application is true and accu ate to the best of my knowledge and understanding. Please rint and si r{ ry�a ,,,/ Title Telepho a Date G t7Z lol �e%f tea? / W Street Address City/Town State Zip Municipal Inspector to fill out this section upon application approval: a.4✓ MI Name V Date i Massachusetts -Department of Public Safety Board of Building Regulations and Standards Construction Supervisor License CS 102083 r.i re o DAVID M YOUNI;` ? 15 GREAT HILL.) s WEYMOUTH MA Expiration 10/21/2016 Commissioner `` CENTCOR-01 MUDALIARTA CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MMIDDIYYYY) 11612015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsements . PRODUCER TACT NAME, certificates@willis.com Willis of Pennsylvania,Inc. PHONEa (g77 945-7378 F 888 467-2378 c/o 26 Century Blvd Ale N Ext): ac No P.O.Box 305191 E-MAIL Nashville,TN 37230-5191 ADDRESS: INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC e INSURER A:Arch Insurance Company 11150 INSURERS:Zurich American Insurance Company 16535 CentiMark Corporation INSURER C: 12 Grandview Circle INSURER D: Canonsburg,PA 15317 INSURER E INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE im POUCYNUMBER POLICY EFF MMIPOLID CY P LIMITS A X COMMERCUMLGENERALUABILRY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,00 CLAIMS-MADE OOCCUR X 11PKG8900708 05101I2014 05I0112015 PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 300,00 MED EXP(Anyone person) $ 5,00 PERSONAL x ADV INJURY $ 2,000,00 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,00 POLICY O JEC a LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 4,000,00 OTHER: I $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 2,000,00 Ea accident A X ANY AUTO X IIPKG8900708 0510112014 0510112015 BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS, X X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ HIRED AUTOS AUTOS Peracddenl j( UMBRELLALWB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10,000,00 B IEXCESS LIAR CLAIMS-MADE UC930387912 05/01/2014 05/01/2015 AGGREGATE $ 10,000,00 DEO RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X PER OTH- WORKERSAND COMP'LIABILITY STATUTE ER A ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE YIN 11WCI8900608 05I01I2014 05I01I2015 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,00 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?- Q NIA (Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYE $ 1,000.00 u yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS bekxv E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,00 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Rem *sSchedule,may be Beached N more space Is required) Division/Location:Chelmsford,MA Workers'Compensation Policy It 11 WC18900608(ADS=All Other States except OH,WA, NO,WY which are insured through state funds). Pneutek Pneumatic Air is included as an Additional Insured in regards to General Liability and Auto Liability,but solely as respect to work performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured,per the written contract CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Pneutek Pneumatic Air AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Attn:Karen Tuthill �/� (.e.17 Friars Dr. U _ Hudson NH.03051 ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 11 1 1 1 1 , 1 11 11 1 1 1 '• t t t r •• e • 1i1I1 11 11II 1 � 1 I - 1 - 1 I tt� I " 1t 1 Sold-To(#1) �, l^4c= � Ship-To(#2) f/�,• I..l �`�a c Street 16CD �e,M 'abr'�S� Street Z-C15- DI,E JT•el�l City �et> V'u---> City ` /��,1 '• ' State zip �{ 1 F73t9 State ' �T Zip Contact Name: 13��^y 1-'-1aXc- tR_-%N,4 Contact Name: 1/\Of3 MQ�.1V1G}J1� Telephone#: ��� t J - 7i�.2 ;�'"�� Telephone#: ( z{�8�) -7`"iI{_ >SSSo Fax#: //�� rr Fax#: E-mail Address r"O - lws1.J,.,U e Ca't'M E-mail Address r I M t% "' a• CeM Bill To Payer Customer name where the invoice will be mailed if drfferenl fmm above (Customer name who will a the invoice ifodifferentTfrom above) w�,,4� A'dlmn LTse�. `��`�SAP,'�SOID�TO Cu rr stomer�T -AR f +J 4k __k AFn13`tl yk r fli 4 `•aY�CJ3 4"h�,': .SOy�yw yx, +i3 3r Pr nu w 4,6 Job Number Q f/ d/ /t� ontract Amount NEWB00%INFO SHEETINF Tom Iil�w Re ional Sales Re A-to i^4l o Billable Rate National Account Re -J 1 r Percenta e 3S•9 ' . Technical Re 1PATtzzGK Cv w+•*+ Pa mentTerms �� AutoQuote# g 2# Start Date s rP �f AutoPro osal# 1 f3 b � Labors Hours Bid 3'51v Tear off E or NO F Proposal Amount $ ski D� Total Hours 3q(S Deck Replacement ORe `` Roof S stem Code c E PD-1 A Scan YES or Deck Type e l.loaa bTr-K Warranty#Years Warranty Name .,- tf REFS ZA vaVe's r I.l- 1�1 I kc�sl,� Insulation T a I" Tzsa SECTION SO. FT SYSTEM WARRANTY f34---- R«h 3 1 f l SFr" T Cs FA>AA f j2o = 16 2 Sr?.FT-, Pc-enwA70 S ' • • 1 1 1 t' tut "t t 1 / 111 /1 I t l - I" t l l- / t t - 1 DEPARTMENT FUNCTION REFERRAL 000i Facilities Dept � 01 Site Contact _ CALL Call-In _ 0002 Purchasing Dept. 02 Purchasing Manager COLD Cold Call _ 0003 Sales Organization 03 Sales Manager 'GOOD Goodwill _ 0004 Maintenance Dept. 04 Personnel Manager HBID Hard Bid _ 0005 Administration 05 Billings Contact REFL Referral Jose+ _ 0006 Roofing Department 06 Payer Contact NATL National Accounts u _ 0007 Quality Department 07 Corp.HDQT Contact SERV Service 0008 Flooring Department 08 Office Contact STOR Storm Damage _ 0009 Financial Department 09 Fin.Accounting Contact TELE Telemarketing 0010 Legal Department 10 Marketing Manager TRAD Trade Shows _ 11 Maintenance Person CUSTOMER TYPE 13 Owner INDUSTRY TYPE: 14 General Manager (Use the SIC List on the Centranet) 15 Plant Manager NN New National Customer _ 17 Plant Engineer LX EN Existing National Customer _ 18 Vice President NR New Regional Customer Old Const._ New Const._ 19 Maintenance Mgr. _ ER Existing Regional Customer , s s FA 4 Job Number:_ Reference Number:_ Name:F.W.Webb Company Name F.-W -Webb Company Address: 160 Middlesex Turnpike Address: 295 Bridge Street e City: Bedford City: Salem State: Ma. Zip:01730 State Ma. Zip: 01970 Contact:Bob Mucciarone Phone Bob Matvichuk Phone: 781 272 -6600 Bmldm s)/Sections : 978 744 - 6550 Per Proposal Dated:CentiMark Proposal#186690 And/or as follows: Protect is to include both the Front& Back Roof Sections Purchase Price:$58,000 Warranty to be issued in the name of: Purchase PO#:_ 1.F.W.Webb Company Centimark Sales Rep:David 1 Pineo 2. Office Location:#1800 Warranty Length(Yrs:20 Years Total System Phone:(978)513 -3300 Payment Terms: 1/3.down -net 30 upon completion Purchaser to initial acknowledgement of Payment Terms:_ F Bank Name: Account#: Address: Contact: Phone: City: Trade References: 1,Trade Reference: Phone: Address: City: State: Zip I s 2.Trade Reference: Phone: ! Address: City: State: Zip 3 e 3.Trade Reference: Phone: y Address: City: State: Zip i 4 F v By my signature below,I certify that I have authority to bind the purchaser and have had the opportunity to review the terms of this Agreement, mclu ing those set forth on the second page. On behalf of the Purchaser, 1 understand and accept said terms i and agr u thereby;and acknowledge that a sample copy of the warranty has been provided for my review. 1 also ? a 1 r s of credit i atimrttTeentimark Corporation. 0 Bob Mucciarone ° Approved and acckpted by Purchaser Printed Name and Title Date SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON SECOND PACE INITIAL PACE 1 i i t' 7 This Sales Agreement confirms the purchase of the services and work described in the CentiMark Corporation r Proposal to the Purchaser and the Sales Agreement. The Scope of Work is limited to what is stated in the 6 Proposal and Sales Agreement. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the Purchase Price does not include the t cost of performing the Work with union labor or at prevailing wage rates; nor does it include removal or abatement of any hazardous materials, including but not limited to asbestos. Purchaser acknowledges that it is i responsible for obtaining any structural, engineering or other architectural analysis of the building(s) on which the Work is to be performed. r F Unless otherwise stipulated on the face herein, the Payment Terms covering this Sales Agreement are: One third (1/3) down payment with balance due net 10 days from invoice. In the event Purchaser fails to pay any balance k when due; then the entire balance shall immediately be due and payable. A Service Charge of one percent (1%) s per month will be added to all Balances past due thirty days. This sale is subject to credit approval by kCentiMark and Purchaser hereby gives CentiMark express authority to check the credit references of the Purchaser. i Any disputes or actions relating to or arising out of the Work to be performed pursuant to this Sales Agreement shall be exclusively governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Jurisdiction and venue of any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the Sales Agreement shall be vested in the state or federal - courts in Washington County, Pennsylvania. Purchaser irrevocably waives any objections it now has or may hereafter have to the convenience or propriety of this venue. S The performance of the Work contemplated by this Sales Agreement shall be governed solely by the Terms and Conditions stated herein, and no other terns and conditions, order acknowledgement or purchase order or any other documentation furnished by the customer shall be construed as an acceptance of any terms or conditions contained in such document which are inconsistent with the Terms and Conditions stated herein, unless accepted in writing by a Corporate Officer of CentiMark. The only warranty to be provided by CentiMark to Purchaser will be the CentiMark Corporation Non-Prorated Limited Warranty for the length of time stated on the face of this Sales Agreement, which terms and conditions shall govern all warranty matters between CentiMark and the Purchaser herein. To be valid, any changes to the Warranty must be specifically approved in writing by a Corporate Officer of CentiMark Corporation. F NOTICE Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that Moisture may have entered into the building prior to CentiMark's roof installation and/or repair of the, roofing system; which may have resulted in Mold ' Growth. CentiMark disclaims any and all responsibility for-damage to,persons''or property arising from or related to the presence of Mold in the building. By executing the contract to which this Notice is s` affixed, Purchaser agrees to the following: 1) releases CentiMark from any and all Claims Purchaser and Purchaser's insurer, employees, tenants and/or any other building occupant or invitee may have as a result of such Mold growth; and 2) agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CentiMark from any d and all penalties, actions, liabilities, costs, expenses and damages arising from or relating directly or indirectly to the presence of Mold on or in Purchaser's Building. j INITIAL PAGE 2 i 05-2006 i f'V7 , dS I I A Ff.'r -1 4m 4414 IV— As ' .40ut q . - a , In a• n e 1 Prepared On: 11/11/2014 Prepared For: Prepared By: Customer Information Project Manager F.W. Webb Co. David J Pineo 295 Bridge St CentiMark Corporation Salem, MA 01970 101 Brick Kiln Rd Ste 10 Attn: Bob Mavjauk Chelmsford, MA 01824 Email: rjm@fwwebb.com David.Pineo@centimark.com Phone: 978-513-3300 Fax: 978-454-0292 Location Information National Account Manager F.W. Webb Co. Joshua Canning 295 Bridge St CentiMark Corporation Salem, MA 01970 101 Brick Kiln Rd Ste 10 Attn: Bob Mavjauk Chelmsford, MA 01824 Email: dm@fwwebb.com Joshua.Canning@centimark.com Phone:'978-513-3300 Fax: 978-454-0292 FASSOC[AnON MONALORNG Please visitus at www.centimark.com WWW UUUJJJJJJNTRACTORS See what makes CentiMark different Construction Specification P* o- ® . F.W.Webb Co. 295 Bridge St Salem,MA 01970 Specifications For CentiMark EPDM Fully Adhered System Sections included: Elevator Penthouse,Back Roof Project Preparation: Perform a pre job meeting to determine jobsite logistics and safety requirements. Furnish and install temporary rooftop chute assembly for debris removal. (Back Roof Only.) Furnish and install proper safety equipment in accordance with Centimark's written safety program. 9 Safety Related Furnish and install warning lines to identified areas associated with ground related roofing activities. Store roofing materials in accordance with good roofing practices. Material placement will be to distribute weight loads throughout the entire roof area. Surface Preparation: Remove and dispose of the existing EPDM and fiberboard insulation down to the original B.U.R. The primary layer of roof will be spot cored for deteriorated/wet insulation. If any is found, it will be removed and replaced at a unit price of $1.25 per square foot per inch of thickness. Areas of removal will be approved by an Owner's representative. (Back Roof Only.) Removal of existing roof will be limited to an amount that can be replaced the same day. (Back Roof Only.) Identify and remove structural deck not capable of providing an acceptable substrate for the installation of the new roof. Furnish and install new deck at a unit cost of$8.75 per square foot per inch of thickness. Areas of removal will be approved by an Owner's representative. Remove and dispose of existing pitch pan(s) as needed. (Back Roof Only.) Remove the existing perimeter termination bar and dispose of debris. (Back Roof Only.) Remove existing wall flashings to a workable surface and dispose of debris. (Back Roof Only.) Insulation Attachment: Furnish and install a layer of V polyisocyanurate insulation, (R-Value = 5.6). This layer of insulation will be mechanically attached to the prepared substrate utilizing FM Global (FM) approved 3" plates and fasteners. Furnish and install a new nailer along the outside perimeter as needed. Furnish and install tapered insulation at the roof drains creating a sump. (Back Roof Only.) System Application: Furnish a CentiMark 60 mil,non-reinforced, EPDM roofing membrane. CentiMark Confidential ® : view instnictional Position the EPDM membrane over the newly prepared substrate and allow the membrane sufficient time to "relax" prior to installation. Fully adhere EPDM membrane to the prepared surface. The seam shall overlap by no less than 4" and be treated with an application of primer wash and sealed with a 4" butyl-based seam tape. 9 Encapsulate the face and top of the parapet wall with the 60 mil EPDM membrane. HVAC,Curbed Penetrations and other Air Handling Unit Details Furnish and install a 6" wide laminated reinforcement perimeter strip at the base of the curb. Fully adhere the EPDM membrane tip the curb using a bonding adhesive. All comers will then be completed with uncured EPDM tubber flashing. Pipes Less Than 6" In Diameter Fumish and install new prefabricated rubber pipe boot secured at the top with a stainless steel screw type clamp fully adhered to the field sheet. 9 Stacks Greater Than 6" In Diameter Furnish and install 60 mil EPDM uncured flashing. Miscellaneous Projections Fumish and install 60 mil EPDM uncured flashing at roof projections. Fumish and install new pitch pan(s)and/or ChemCurb(s) as needed. (Back Roof Only.) New pitch pan(s) and/or ChennCurb(s) shall be installed utilizing mechanical fasteners and/or adhesives and topped with sealant. (Back Roof Only.) Furnish and install EPDM uncured flashing to meet the dimensions of the pitch pan(s)'(Back Roof Only.) Fumish and install sealants to detail projections as needed. Sheet Meta[Accessories: Fumish and install new .040" mill finish aluminum gravel stop with continuous cleat. Fumish and install new retrofit drain inserts into existing drains. (Back Roof Only.) Standard Operating Procedures: Employee Professionalism All work shall be performed in a safe,professional manner in compliance with Centimark policy. Permits CentiMark will supply the necessary permits for the project:. During permitting, the City of Salem may require the services of a certified professional. Any fees related to obtaining permit approval are not included in CentiMark's proposal. Nightly Tie-In's Depending on new roof system being installed, temporary water cut-offs are to be constructed at the end of each working day to protect the newly installed roof system and building interior. Clean Un All work premises will be cleaned daily during the construction process and at the completion of the project. Job Acceptance and Punch List CentiMark Confidential ® :view instructional v