Loading...
132 BRIDGE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 5 SuperTab® Oversized-Tab Folders 90% Larger Label Area /// I S M E A D KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED No. 11987 Paten!Pending Made In USA GET ORGANIZED AT SMEAD.COM MIN.RECYCLED CONTENT 1O%POST-CONSUMER VIAids°3, •ER-.COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Sign '' - item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X [3 Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Addressee so that we Can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No �'il hand CercJlb "e,)Qje— ~'0 v-I�,J S. Service Type ❑Certified Mal10 ❑Priority Mail Express' ❑Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑Collect on Delivery 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee). ❑Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service rabeq UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Postage&Fees Paid SPS Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4®in this box• City Of Salem Building Department 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01070 t ' I I I i i t!I 'f t, I 111 III I 1 ul nit Lk• : it I lul L?1I1'�F'.�d��' !� �A��At � llETs a ' BUILDING INSPECTOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR ® Alt SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 4 ®n 111� III MMYYYYI/�"'III�VVV9� {k I I • , N —I--_-2.2L5 6562 2000 050E 2TU. r - s V ist Nonce_----' � ,. •� � . +�a Non�G� -- 1 13 --_--- A CLA N A 1- MED �,� a 1.. I 1� F a CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3" FLOOR TEL. (978) 745-9595 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAX(978) 740-9846 MAYOR THOMAS STYIERRE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER June 1. 2015 Richard Cerullo - 51 Kimball Avenue Revere Ma. 02151 Re 122 Boston Street Dear Mr. Cerullo, You have asked about the status of an occupancy permit for the building at 122 Boston Street. I issued a letter on January 212015, in which I removed the Occupancy of the entire building. The letter included my requirements for the owner, Trinh Ma, to complete before an occupancy permit would be issued. We also posted the Building with a legal notice revoking the Occupancy Permit. In late April „I was informed that the building was again being occupied. I visited the property and informed the owner that she was in violation of Mass State Building Code and again referred to my previous letter which had the requirements necessary to obtain an Occupancy Permit . Since that time ,the owner did hire an Architect to do a code review and that document was produced by Architect Paul Lessard and was received on May 5h of this year. To date no Building permit has been pulled,no Building inspections have.been.conducted andthe building remains illegally occupied. Sinc ly, Thomas St.Pierre y :ti ( itg of �5zalrm, � ttsstttljusetts Poarb of �i e4 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHIRLEY & MICKEY BENSON FOR"kE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 132 BRIDGE ST. .4ASS A hearing on this petition was held January 21 , 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and. others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioners are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming structure and use to allow construction of an addition in this R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, -the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of noncon- forming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of noncon- forming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be more detrimental than the existing nonconform- ing use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. t `' . The. Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was no opposition; 2. The owners have operated there business at this site for the past seven (7 ) years without complaints from the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal- concludes as follows: 1 . The granting of the Special Permit requested will prorote the convenience and welfare of t:ne City'S inhabitants; 2. The relief reouested can be Sranted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogatin^ fro_:, the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHIRLEY & MICKEY BENSON FOR A SPECIAL F=REIT FOR 132 BRIDGE ST. , SALEI: page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . A building permit must be obtained; 2. Must comply with all regulations and requirements of the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau; 3. Construction to be done in accordance with plans submitted; 4. Exterior of the proposed addition must conform with the finishes of existing building. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH .THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK F r: S 4 of Salem, Cttssucljusetts i \' ?. Poarb of 'Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION_OF SHIRLEY & MICKEY BENSON FOF;FV SPECIAL PERMIT FOR-1324BRIDGE ST. CITY Z ;uhSS A hearing on this petition was held January 21 , 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of-the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter .40A. The petitioners are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming' structure and use to allow construction of an addition in this R-2 district. The provision -of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth .in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of noncon- forming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of noncon- forming lots, land, -structures, and uses,- provided; however, that such"extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be more detrimental than the existing.nonconform- - ng use to the neighborhood. -- In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, __,guided-'by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding " *+by the-Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety,. convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. ALL, The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was .no opposition; The owners have operated there _business at this site for the past seven (7) years without complaints from the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal conclude=_ as follows: 1 . The granting of the Special Permit requested will proeote the convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants; 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating fro::, the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. f ^DECISION ON' THE PETITI01d OF SHIRLEY & MICKEY EENSOi2 FOR A SPECIAL PERP;IT FOR 132 BRIDGE ST. , SALEM, page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . A building permit must be obtained; 2. Must comply with all regulations and requirements of the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau; 3. Construction to be done in accordance with plans submitted; 4. Exterior of the proposed addition must conform with the finishes of existing building. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED 1 Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK r e h_ES KAP11 07 RP?"c'A i `i f itg of �lpm, � ttssttt�jusetts �varb of 'crkpeal FEE DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SHIRLEY & MICKEY BENSON FORF'�E SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 132 BRIDGE ST. 1 11 CITY.` _.. ;L ,y4SS A hearing on this petition was held January 21 , 1987 with the following Board Members present; James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioners are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming structure and use to allow construction of an addition in this R-2 district. The provision of the Salem .Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of noncon- forming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of noncon- forming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be more detrimental than the existing nonconform- ing use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: i . There was no opposition; 2. The owners have operated there business at this site for the past seven (7) years without complaints from the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants; 2. The relief requested can be Sranted without substantial detriment to the public good and w' thout nullifying or substantially derogatinc fro.:, the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION 01,: THE PETITION OF SHIRLEY & MICKEY BENSON FOR A SPECIAL FERi:_T FOR 132 BRIDGE ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . A building permit must be obtained; 2. Must comply with all regulations and requirements of the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau; 3. Construction to be done in accordance with plans submitted; 4. Exterior of the proposed addition must conform with the finishes of existing building. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED J Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK l _ - --- 60.4P7 0- PIPE,"