Loading...
109 BRIDGE STREET - BUILDING JACKET 109 BRIDGE STREET Citp of 9patem, Aamwbuatt!5 ! s Vublic Prupertp Bepartment Jguflbing IBepartment One green (978) 745-9595-959 5 ext. 380 � 1( Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer June 30, 1998 Theodore Kuszmar 51 Valley Road Topsfield, Mass. 01983 RE: 109 Bridge Street Dear Mr. Kuszman: Due to a complaint received by the Neighborhood Improvement Task Force, I conducted an inspection and found the following violation: You must remove the illegal sign and frame at side of building or file proper application with the Planning Department to acquire a permit for said sign. Please contact this office upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violations. Failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against you. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation regarding this matter. Sincerely, /l r Kevin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector KGG: scm cc: Patricia Carney Councillor Flynn, Ward 2 Ellen Dubinsky Cftp of *alem, Aa!6!5arbugEtt5 J901ir Propertp Department �3mlbing Department One tba(em green (978) 745-9595 QZxt. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer April 8 , 1998 Theodore Kuszmar 51 Valley Road Topsfield, Mass . 01983 RE : 109 Bridge Street Dear Mr . Kuszmar: Thank you very much for your response to the letter dated in February 25 , 1998 regarding the above mentioned property. An inspection was conducted and found all the violations have been corrected. This office will notify all the appropriate departments and the Ward Councillor that this situation has been brought to a satisfactory conclusion . Sincerely, o Leo o E . Trem4la7 Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc : Jane Guy Councillor Flynn, Ward 2 Citp Of &alem, f am5ar ufsett5 Public Propertp Mepartment 4 Ouilbing 3Department One.&alem green (978) 745-9595 @at. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer February 25, 1998 Theodore Kuszmar 51 Valley Road Topsfield, Mass. 01983 RE: 109 Bridge Street Dear Mr. Kuszman: Due to a complaint received by the Neighborhood Improvement Task Force, I conducted an inspection and found the following violation: You must remove the illegal sign at side of building or file proper application with the Planning Department to acquire a permit for said sign. Please notify this department within fifteen ( 15) days upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violation. Failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against you. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation regarding this matter. Sincerely, o� Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Build gs LET: scm cc: Jane Guy Councillor Flynn, Ward 2 CITY OF SALEM NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT TASK FORCE Jurisdiction Hist. Comm. Yes ❑ NO L REFERRAL FORM Cons. Comm. Yes ❑ NO SRA Yes ❑ No Date: Address: //I//�J o. �G p � ,af7 llecl l'r NdrP /7E� 5 c �7 G/7 Complaint: G '�O ' T— Complainant: &,lInc NULL) r 2//Z 7v � Phone#1: Address of Complainant: BUILDING INSPECTOR de FIRE PREVENTION ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT CITY SOLICITOR ANIMAL CONTROL SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT TREASURER/COLLECTOR ASSESSOR WARD COUNCILLOR DPW SHADE TREE PLEASE CHECK THE ABOVE REFERENCED COMPLAINT AND RESPOND TO THE SP PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN ONE WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. ACTION: 7 ettp of 'arem' Aa!5!5arbU5ett!5 i Pubic Propertp Mppartment Wtulbing Mepartment One ba[em green (978) 745-9595 (Est. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer February 25, 1998 Theodore Kuszmar 51 Valley Road Topsfield, Mass. 01983 RE: 109 Bridge Street Dear Mr. Kuszman: Due to a complaint received by the Neighborhood Improvement Task Force, I conducted an inspection and found the following violation: You must remove the illegal sign at side of building or file proper application with the Planning Department to acquire a permit for said sign. Please notify this department within fifteen (15) days upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violation. Failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against you. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation regarding this matter. Sincceerreeelljy,�� oma-. �i✓tt0' Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Build gs LET: scm cc: Jane Guy Councillor Flynn, Ward 2 CITY OF SALEM NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT TASK FORCE Jurisdiction Hist. Comm. Yes t] No I REFERRAL FORM Cons. Comm. Yes ❑ No SRA Yes 0 No Date: Address: /(, 9 11r �G 2 S7 Complaint: G /(� /�.� Complainant: Phoned: Address of Complainant: BUILDING INSPECTOR / ���i,"2 FIRE PREVENTION ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT CITY SOLICITOR ANIMAL CONTROL SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT TREASURER/COLLECTOR ASSESSOR WARD COUNCILLOR DPW SHADE TREE PLEASE CHECK THE ABOVE REFERENCED COMPLAINT AND RESPOND TO THE SF PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITHIN ONE WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. ACTION: 109 Bridge St. B-1 Theodore Kuszmar �� � 's 4� �ti C� he Z %s',-47L L f Are, 32.al • ����tH"OF y,��c - , . /j,�.;d�l7pt""y,,y a � i'°'��'"�'M-/�fi�� � • � �I - RIC Ni 555 D$A!E ./. �/L Xt''�+l�w�"F `f" �+R• r'.5;, i +^"r4sm -- tJ3 363 l (p �` flit ofttlem, � ttssttt�jusetts •' s Poara of �ppeal = 25 A 9 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THEODORE KUSZMAR FOR A { VARIANCE AT 109 BRIDGE ST. (B-1) c� A hearing on this petition was held on August 22, 1984= wit�lthe following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman, Scot'l. Charnas, Secretary, Robert Gauthier and Associate Member, Richard A. Bencai. Ndtice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40 A. The petitioner has requested a Variance from lot coverage and rear and side setbacks to construct an addition to his store at 109 Bridge St. in this B-1 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. spacial conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; B. literalenforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would • involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and; C. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without modefying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition raised by neighbors and abutters. 2. The store on the lot was there before the zoning laws were inacted. 3. The shape of the lot and building makes any expansion except the one proposed impractical. 4. The enactment of the bottle and can deposit law is putting a strain on existing space within the present facility. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which affect this lot but which do -- not affect the district generally. i PETITION OF THEODORE KUSZMAR FOR A VARIANCE FOR 109 BRIDGE ST. • page two 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial financial hardship upon petitioner. 3. The variance requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously to grant petitioner the variance requested in order to construct the addition des- cribed in the plan submitted to the Board subject to the following conditions: 1. A six foot high stockade fence be constructed the entire length of the new addition which faces 113 Bridge ST. 2. All deliveries to the store, except those from a tractor-trailer. be made on Arbella St. 3. The petitioner must install an approved fire alarm system, maintain adequate egress and lighting and maintain an approved hearing system within an enclosed boiler room. VARIANCE GRANTED UNAMIOUSLY Richard A. Ben al, Associate Member A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK " APPEAL FRO7. THIS DECISION, I. ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 11 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LA'O,'S, CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. PURSANT TO :i.ASS. CEN=RAL LA',S, CHAPTER 808, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN, SHALL NOT TATE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION, BEARING THE CERT. FICATION CF THE Llir CL-_R(, THW. 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF S''":! AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DISF,:ISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN THE S7GiH ESSEt RE::ISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER QF RECORD OR IS RE;�RDED AND NOTED GN THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPC6 Cn 1 r r a 71 • t7 o m c)N DOAPD OF APPEALS AUGRE CEIVE'. CITY OF SALEM,MAS$, 113 Bridge St. Salem, MA 01970 Aug.16, 1984 City of Salem RE: T. Kuszmar variance from lot coverage Board of Appeal and rear 4 side setbacks to construct One Salem Green addition at 109 Bridge St. Salem, MA 01970 Gentlemen: As it will be impossible for me to attend the Aug.22nd hearing in person, I respectfully request that this letter be read to the Board on the night of the hearing, Aug.22, and that the Board consider favorably the recommendations set forth in the letter. At present, I am spending a great deal of money to restore the property immediately adjacent to Mr. Kuszmar's store. This fact can be verified by the Salem Redevelopment Authority, which has recently provided funding to aid in the historic building's restoration. My property and building, located at 113 Bridge St. , will significantly decrease in aesthetic value with Mr. Kuszmar's proposed addition, especially if the new addition is similar in appearance to the already-existing store. Because I do not wish to thwart Mr. Kuszmar's plan entirely, I strongly recommend that every effort be made to maintain a favorable aesthetic appearance. For this reason, I recommend that a wooden stockade fence be constructed at the height and the entire length of the proposed addition. In this way flowers and vines could be planted against the fence to land- scape the grounds and mask the addition from the 113 Bridge St. property. If this fence were built, I would have no strong objection to Mr. Kuszmar's proposed addition, for I believe that only in this way could the residence and the business harmoniously coexist. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elizabeth Murphy Copy to: G. Kavanaugh, SRA Project Director c_. rN �� /r r p( f w, I_ •' t,i mom _ 1 I D3dt4; 1tl6ii rOLARDI DO 7 4 1 �r / v 3.� t n191 AA PSL Alin IDOL APPEAL CASE NOj. .. .. .... .... ...... . . . .. of Aa lel.fflassadfuse##q TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: JUL I 4 34 PH 'Ba The Undersigned represent that he is are theRQ<1rp� Cof a certain parcel of land to ted at NO. . . . . . ,l.O.`j. .BRI h.6�. .ST. . . . . . . . . . . AIY.QES4h!ASS.-Street; Zoning District—�.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) .... ..... .. . . ... of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with .Section IX A.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. �1 m H Uj S aQ W U_ �. eu O (J W C,C CV �O - O = F The Application fbi• Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: / 8=__tq R yA Q 0 SAO yAvzD s e= r6 A ckS W 0 r M r 7 �. Gc 7 Covt-zkl 7r Of A/ I'ita's75 The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build .as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Tev ORDr-re To ,e /y Serve C3co� Blrpr ��/E� /�o/e s for0ye m c� ol�s�oGoy or P4 �� . P9 4' -rhe lei PSPnf g f� r�f�r�p is foo s ;-r,&IC Address. . . . 1.q.q.. . 1; / S .7. . . . .. .... Telephone. . . . . .. . . ... ...... ... .... .. . . ...... Petitioner. . . . . ... .. . .. .. .. ... . .... .. . .. .... Address. . . . . . . ... . .. .. ... .... . ..... . . . .... .. Date. . . .?/ . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . ... . . . . ....... . .. .. .... . . ..... .. By. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . .... ......... . . . ..... . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . .. . .. .. .... . .. .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News.. r NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATIONw PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... CONDITIONS I . I, ................................................................ ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED....................❑ DENIED......................... ❑ ................................................ ..1 19......... i Jug 12 4 34The PaNisign'-d G i 'fia s RSC t } :_ CUr QF �'IiI Cs,i!4'.£S . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and _ d parcel in ( tt. nd i.'.,j Soct1'::n(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 'll C 'o. l 7{'.S OxrihingLhe work ploposad, i,. -.hava Won SOMted to -f;fl F? 11J?cZOY of pllliyi 'Igs il'I :J L J O U� liJ 11 Q J copy 1 i_sotan Or Par :t was danied hal the inspector of Buildings ;or the fo lcnin'y /. ��r?a� yranp � $r�r_ �/ia2o SCTt3/ac�S /v� 7 r>7F-� Z, Loi Ca ✓ xrr-PDS � Oivir/Gj /(�r_ ' /�/v'75 UP nigra d hereby petitions the i';j,ard of. Appeals to . =r'yr the T-: _i h,� S Q`;.. . ,. � Zml „ ' _ and/or the i.J i l tii ly .Code and order the inspector of !I i i i ng t.: uppme VAL c.pplicati ri Re psmit to build as filed. as YW Marco: - Q of said . i(C" Py-Lawy and Building Coda t:;O :lCli7lvJi _ practical _ ,."y 'fe UndarsiqqK CIC : l i i 'Tay .e graQeu witout :I_ _i C. J aro- gs ;'olTl ii intent . i; purpose o i n Wing (.midi :anc and Building Code for ' 1 n ci ciP( 7�o PTT' GiFr�r�y SC�r'vE �o�c3l C//P�.y �p/�(-' r-n t-r'P s--fo ice J P c�.1�c� cl spl y �r/-Na is /'F'y psi/z�C6 Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thm? copies of the application muit W iiled Frith the Secreti:.ry of the Board o ('-.i: " wls 411tH a ch;.'l , for adva'i'1:N ng in thy I:o R of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr weeks prior to the mEnt.ing of thy Boar . of Ap;)eals. C112CK pay%`_; Ic, io The C: ,.:. : SI Nam. t yj��;I It�1 of �;alci1I �155�iL�1It51� f5 ROBERT J. CROWLEY PJChiet �&zulim, 01970 Date : August 16 , 1984 Salem Board of Appeal Re : 109 Bridge Street City of Salem, Isassachusetts Theodore Kuszmar One Salem-,green Hearing Date : 8/22/84 Salem, Mass. 01970 Sirs : r As a result of public notice received concerning the Board of Appe;.l hearing for the above listed name and address, the Salem Fire Department , requeSta the following items to be placed on record . 1. The Salem Fire Department has not been provided a plan as of this date, showing the proposed addition. 2 . Approval is withheld until this office has been contactefi with plans in such clarity and detail so as to provide us with the conditions of construction, to permit this- office to render an opinion, concerning the additional fire loading and access. for fire fighting purposes. 3 . This occupancy shall be required at the time of construction to meet all provisions of the current Mass . State Building Code and the Fire Code. This shall require installation of an approved fire alarm system, adequate egress and lighting, approved heating system within an enclosed boiler room, and adequate access to the exterior of the structure for fire - fighting purposes. n r••.� c' 1 .J Respectfully submitted, Deputy Chief Uavid J gggin cc : file Salem Fire Prevention Inspector i'. BOARD OF APPA!5 CITY OF St-.LE ' VASS, 113 Bridge St. Salem, MA 01970 Aug. 16, 1984 City of Salem RE: T. Kuszmar variance from lot coverage Board of Appeal and rear $ side setbacks to construct One Salem Green addition at 109 Bridge St. Salem, MA 01970 Gentlemen: As it will be impossible for me to attend the Aug.22nd hearing in person, I respectfully request that this letter be read to the Board on the night of the hearing, Aug.22, and that the Board consider favorably the recommendations set forth in the letter. At present, I am spending a great deal of money to restore the property immediately adjacent to Mr. Kuszmar's store.- This fact can be verified by the Salem Redevelopment Authority, which has recently provided funding to aid in the historic building' s restoration. My property and building, located at 113 Bridge St. , will significantly decrease in aesthetic value with Mr. Kuszmar' s proposed addition, especially if the new addition is similar in appearance to the already-existing store. Because I do not wish to thwart Mr. Kuszmar's plan entirely, I strongly recommend that every effort be made to maintain a favorable aesthetic appearance. For this reason, I recommend that a wooden stockade fence be constructed at the height and the entire length of the proposed addition. In this way flowers and vines could be planted against the fence to land- scape the grounds and mask the addition from the 113 Bridge St. property. If this fence were built, I would have no strong objection to Mr. Kuszmar's proposed addition, for I believe that only in this way could the residence and the business harmoniously coexist. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elizabeth Murphy Copy to: G. Kavanaugh, SRA Project Director yam of �cajpm, c �Sgtttl�ugPt#S 9 i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THEODORE KUSZMAR FOR A VARIANCE AT 109 BRIDGE ST. (B-1) -? i A hearing on this petition was held on August 22, 1984-' witE the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Vice Chairman, ScoU_ Chacnas, Secretary, Robert Gauthier and Associate Member, Richard A. Bencai. Nbtice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40 A. The petitioner has requested a Variance from lot coverage and rear and side setbacks to construct an addition to his store at 109 Bridge St. in this B-1 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. spacial conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; B. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; and; C. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without modefying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition raised by neighbors and abutters. 2. The store on the lot was there before the zoning laws were inacted. 3. The shape of the lot and building makes any expansion except the one proposed impractical. 4. The enactment of the bottle and can deposit law is putting a strain on existing space within the present facility. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which affect this lot but which do not affect the district generally. iPETI;ION OF THEODORE KUSZMAR FOR A VARIANCE FOR 109 BRIDGE ST. page two 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial financial hardship upon petitioner. 3. The variance requested may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, and without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously to grant petitioner the variance requested in order to construct the addition des- cribed in the plan submitted to the Board subject to the following conditions: 1. A six foot high stockade fence be constructed the entire length of the new addition which faces 113 Bridge ST. 2. All deliveries to the store, except those from a tractor-trailer. be made on Arbella St. 3. The petitioner must install an approved fire alarm system, maintain adequate egress and lighting and maintain an approved hearing system within an enclosed boiler room. VARIANCE GRANTED UNAMIOUSLY Richard A. Ben al, Associate Member A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK ' APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, I: ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 11 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECiS!OH IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. PURSANT TO :i.ASS. CENERAL LA'n S. CHAPTER SOS, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED HEREIN, SHALL NUT TA!;E EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION, BEARING THE CERT• FICATION OF THE Glo CLERK, TiIAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SJ',:: AN APPEAL HAS GUN FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS!,'ISSED OR DENIED IS RECORDED I1-1 THE S',UIH ESSEX RE;:ISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER QF. RECORD OR IS REJ�ROED AND NBFED ON THE O'WNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPS 03 Ln{ T D c: Ja T1 I--r ,...f, n l7 C-) m o DATE OF HEARING U � PETITIONER pp LOCATION O 9p) MOTION: TO GRANTte%v SECONDED /✓a we �c e r TO DENY SECONDED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECONDED CONTINUE SECONDED ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW CONTINUE r SCOTT CHARNAS JAMES HACKER ROBERT GAUTHIER ✓ EDWARD LUZINSKI PETER STROUT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS / — RICHARD BENCAL `AHTHUR LABRECQUE ` DISCUSSION & CONDITIONS: r l : legal leg ew legal C7 02 4 e 08 1584 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745.0215 Will bold aPublic Hearing for all persons in- terested in the petition submitted by Theodore -Kuszmar for a Variance from lot coverage and rear and side setbacks in order to construct an addition at 109 Bridge St. (B.). Said bearing to be held Wednesday,August 122,1984 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green,2nd floor. BRENDA M. SUMRALL, Clerk August 8, 15, 1984 BOARD OF ASSESSORS e� yj 93 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY HALL. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 07970 (677)744-0660 5 s ��ccyrvc� July 19, 1984 ABUTTERS TO: 109 Bridge Street Map 36 Lot 422 ASSESSED OWNER: Kuszmur's Market Inc. MAP LOT LOCATION ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 36 380 107 Bridge Street Ronald F Trippett 36 So Main Street," Topsfield, MA 01938 36 423 111 Bridge Street Edward D & Kalliope Murphy 5 Newhall Place ✓ Peabody, MA 01960 36 73 106 Bridge Street Systems Improvements Inc 445 Eastern Ave. ✓ Malden, MA 02148 36 114 104 Bridge Street William E & Louise H Pelletier 5 Columbus Square ✓ Salem, MA 01970 36 381 1 Arbella Street Lauretta M O'Hara Same as location 36 420 8 Arbella Street John G Tzortzis 12 Beacon Street✓ Salem, MA 01970 36 419 10 Arbella Street Robert J & Helen Campbell Beverly Savings Bank✓ Beverly, MA 01915 36 421 113 Bridge Street One 13h Bridge St Rlty Tr. 12 Thorndike Street✓ Carol Marciano Tr. Beverly, MA 01915 36 424 102 Webb Street Boston & Maine R R 150 Causeway Street c/o Edmond LeBlanc Boston, MA 02114 CVc`' tis .'. � . OuL C./ 211' "• .'L `, 8 ry t 6 / U q n W "F sz o/b �^" 4- \ \o ``,' ego m S �,aGi/` , 3 CNC) .�, 6 86F b v r� S a d S Zbr,s` F FA O m,o F °n b ps o c,5' �1 9 „c b` C) W (� o Sn"f O m r'8 ^ �86F 1, �� 3 o w O k F Og a g �Z i l S 1 <zo,- n - - - - - . L b t. 19 0.9 ` � o 0 00 ^' Ad( (AJ ru .: S n S z 4 Cb 2t' �v ° off` l�� e a n�J ��'.� n'�l'� ) � s� ! •'_� s p /P"��C, 1 � QS � % :d �Jf;ti . .�, � l �R£ �9 Chi# of '�ttleut, C �I ucl?u ett ��wms. O" ire 11cpurtntent lic2i6queirtrm ROBERT J. CROWLEY 4'8 �dzifgidty ,4tred achier �ttlsm, � da. 01970 Date: August 16, 1984 Salem Board of Appeal Re : 109 Bridge Street City of Salem, Massachusetts Theodore Kuszmar One Salem Green Hearing Date: 8/22/84 Salem, Mass. 01970 Sirs: a As a result of public notice received concerning the Board of Appeal hearing for the above listed name and aaaress, the Salem Fire Department, request:; the following items to be placed on record . 1. The Salem Fire Department has not been provided a plan as of this date, showing the proposed addition. 2. Approval is withheld until this office has been contacted with plans in such clarity and detail so as to provide us with the conditions of construction, to permit this office to render an opinion, concerning the additional fire loading and access for firefighting purposes. 3. This occupancy shall be required at the time of construction to meet all provisions of the current Mass. State Building Code and the Fire Code. This shall require installation of an approved fire alarm system, adequate egress and lighting, approved heating system within an enclosed boiler room, and adequate access to the exterior of the structure for fire fighting purposes. orn� rn cn C't r N C€ r;t �- CD rr: v � y Respectfully submitted, Deputy Chier Davi J. Go gin cc: file Salem Fire Prevention Inspector Form #105A „.cov�rt�s A (f�itg of '�$ttfem, Anssuchuse##s Poxrb of �kppwf September 5, 1984 NOTICE IS HERBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF THEODORE KUSZMAR FOR A VARIANCE AT 109 BRIDGE STREET - WITH CONDITIONS. BOARD OF APPEAL Scott E. Charnas Secretary ,7c APPF?,L %R^.:3 T!r'.T' '7: i PURSUANT TO SECTION L7 OF THE MASS. GEN'FA.- -Rd £0 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING PURSAY; rE . .. . , .. -. T!I' VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED h t ESI:. !. r ”"i -i' " `,:Pi. BEARING THE CERT- FICATiON OF -ifl_ ].. . . .., . . .., 'E:1 .. .. "AL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUGb n ., . `.D OR DENIED IS RECORDED IN IHd ::'a '' . :. - :-. NAME OF THF .,'r.:L. OF RECORD OR IS RL"iiUEU _. AIP uIOQ➢!li tri f t r=f Faut �. — � I 4 cont. -Lo, PJL,'Ct' F30P�, 1 k c l �, o +r ,i�,4"rck �� :.. f � { .,_.. i A'G'•� -^s;:-_._- .`.�:�.-..,;�- '�°�✓.c--!e�c�. nf\ � oo.,�..-c :-ti� :��:r-( ♦ �.:r'..�y . _ _ i t 3cI - ZYr T/ r� v I3 s-rr /v T IN/ tr -... . .— ... / cN t - tt Ca�c PAA r rL z.,nr �lvn 1 135r4NT PCP7+-! 1 —.�.—...__ ._—._._ .. + ' • i r f f , - � ,i ,,\ ala i , h t I 4 , i , e ! t + I ; , , 1 a - �Z D( 6ffel9. '{'-R'O.G ' Cent tta�at !h> � e/, I + l , • � ` � S tra< b�c�� f ♦n>y,. .; + � " � r ravc, T.o� - -, i _. i t JLI et+ i - ' WZe_l JV -- - - lti r?4 04, f , 4 i , nn". •�o+..+ 1 , , , , SFCT E }} II PROPOSED fIDh171oN: — KL15 z /"7Fa,4'5 MIRI?/cET TA I tf ! IO 9 'ST , SFa L'F/`M:, /'7/�SS_ rt .♦`C.C . I - : I } .. i .. r : - u :.?;r uA:RU. :3.. O T - OC /¢ 19SS s.' ,fin Lnc°r�S „ g '0'07 .yLV ;,V,.ST C ons fr'vc fion Moto g er5 3 4? Cv t � % s✓._Y 1 _ _, _. :_.. . w //1f♦rT //p♦ t .. ,.«.{ri;� c i P�/9N5 r W7 7,10 Sh 2 of z r �F__._. II__.__ 1 I j ,_ f __ 11 1. - -. .. i '. ', I. __ i i I � __ __ -, I '. I 't, '� c `� V �.. i i __ - .. i f I ! T �• 7 ' O ` 1 _ eI ,flJ ;c l Ai('W PQidb lht f t t ov<^�• - - lr t 1� b 1 t _ I u , + ._._-._._,.:._.. _ s.....,- .....•._... -i-- ._. ._._...,..-•,.........v-..W.,._ VIN ;Q rnG.4 : i , Gx15� 5frDcy 1 Af ADlSi7"iww hb.crk l.� . . s"w' \I i , Z—L F /.J s� N�TO1.JN1� Y - - — f IS T if _I h. it Cona pnl I�� BSC'(lit PEP7r/ �. Z, G Oki trvn 1 a j40 - , To fie DF_ Tc 21+{ga(r., R Fro PA necn4= - — i ..` + , t # t .. I - i 1 •'3''d _• , . t C'aNDIT10N5 4 , r A t : i, y 21'e .h2 .� /L .e.p 1 � t \ v I� � } ! I # } ➢ } � � t ! { l � r � Wt+h t ,. h,ells 1 l __ xd i I I t Or trots `'('."-o"a.G f�2 t9`/�'u►� 1 ' „ Sol, #1 7,1, r 3 ("t-orr bled IhSG� � Pf OCA 7f4f.J }I t ( FZ ' + t 2091&'C'J&lt v.� / t EGTloxt -7i�'�ht5 ffFx'3 6 S FRoposrA AP.PITloN — KUS � MFal45 MRRhET _ ✓'�S�B " nLy U;, Ted -- w F k �!!. ! 3 I 1 ( �vl -ter eAt - :9 .0ni c7E., 'S T, ,• ;�, SFa,L' / 7, /"1F�ss. ' fe'f +E�tatirf l7ftlern�r ( - f i pG1NOr«y .,+ /0 x j - too $. } .HARD . .-•'! �.1 /°1/L:/'/O/TI-�SS oC3 • Nt � � . _ � C S 7 5vL vowonsevcx777- 3 G 3/ G��EV.9TioNS