Loading...
EXPANDED ENF REPORT 1 AND 2 LEE FORT TERRACEExpanded Environmental Notification Form and Supplemental Report August 15, 2022 Subject Properties 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts Proponent BC Leefort Terrace LLC c/o Beacon Communities LLC 2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 Boston, MA 02108 Property Owner Salem Housing Authority 27 Charter Street Salem, MA 01970 Project Team: LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Bohler BSC Group ICON Architecture Linnean Solutions Regenesis Group Vanasse &Associates, Inc. August 15, 2022 Electronic Delivery Secretary Bethany A. Card Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Attn:MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston MA 02114 Re:Expanded Environmental Notification Form [LEC File #:BRP\20-064.02] 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts Dear Secretary Card: On behalf of the Proponent,BC Leefort Terrace LLC and the Property Owner, Salem Housing Authority, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc., (LEC) is filing this Expanded Environmental Notification Form and Supplemental Report in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (M.G.L. c 30, s. 61-62H, MEPA) and the MEPA Regulations (301 CMR 11.00), specifically 301 CMR 11.06 (8), which allows a Proponent to file an Expanded ENF requesting a Single EIR.The Proponent proposes to replace 50 obsolete,one-bedroom garden style apartments with 124,1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments in a U- shaped building with garage and surface parking,courtyard resident community space, and 1.26±acres of publicly accessible open space at the above-referenced Project Site. In accordance with 301 CMR 11.10 (7), a copy of this Expanded ENF filing has been circulated to the required Agencies/Reviewers (Distribution List).Notice of environmental review has been sent to the Salem News for publication on August 24, 2022 as required at 301 CMR 11.15 (l) of the MEPA Regulations.It is our understanding this Expanded ENF will be noticed for Public Review in the Environmental Monitor on August 24, 2022, beginning the 30-day comment period, which closes on September 23, 2022,followed by 7 days for the Secretary to issue the Expanded ENF Certificate on September 30, 2022. If you have any questions regarding this filing,I may be contacted in our Wakefield Office at 781-245-2500 or at amarton@lecenvironmental.com. Sincerely, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Ann M. Marton, President Director of Ecological Services Table of Contents Expanded Environmental Notification Form Distribution List Supplemental Information Report 1.0 SUMMARY 1-1 1.1 Project Summary 1-1 1.2 Summary of Required Reviews, Permits, Approvals, and Actions 1-2 1.3 Summary of Alternatives 1-3 1.4 Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation 1-3 2.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 2-1 2.1 Wetland Resource Areas 2-1 2.1.1 Coastal Bank 2-2 2.1.2 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 2-2 2.1.3 100-Foot Buffer Zone 2-2 2.1.4 Filled Tidelands 2-3 2.2 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Designation 2-3 2.3 Traffic, Transit, and Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation 2-3 2.4 Historic Structures or Districts, and Archaeological Sites 2-4 2.5 The Built Environment 2-4 2.6 Existing Infrastructure (Sanitary Sewer, Water, Electric) 2-4 2.7 Environmental Justice Communities 2-4 3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT 3-1 3.1 New Building & Courtyard Outdoor Resident Community Space 3-2 3.2 Sustainable Design 3-4 3.3 Site Access, Parking & Bicycle Storage 3-4 3.4 Site Grading & Lighting 3-5 3.5 Publicly Accessible Open Space 3-5 3.6 Stormwater Management 3-6 3.7 Sanitary Sewer, Water, Electric 3-6 4.0 ALTERNATIVES 4-1 4.1 No build Alternative 4-1 4.2 224 Unit Alternative 4-2 4.3 124 Unit Plant Filed with ZBA and Conservation Commission 4-2 4.4 124 Unit Preferred Plan 4-3 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS 5-1 5.1 Land Alteration 5-1 5.2 Floodplain and Tidelands Impacts 5-1 Table of Contents 5.3 Transportation Impacts 5-1 5.4 Passive House (PAHIUS) Design 5-2 5.5 Construction Related Impacts 5-3 5.6 Climate Change Adaptation & Resiliency 5-3 5.7 Storm Rise and Recede Flow Paths 5-3 5.8 Environmental Justice 5-3 5.8.1 Public Involvement Protocols for Environmental Justice Populations 5-4 5.8.2 Analysis of Project Impacts on Environmental Justice Populations 5-7 6.0 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS 6-1 6.1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations 6-1 6.1.1 310 CMR 10.04 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 6-1 6.1.2 DEP Stormwater Management Policy 6-2 6.2 Salem Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance & Salem Wetlands 6.2 Protection Regulations 6.2.1 Section 50-9 Climate Change Resiliency 6-2 6.2.2 Section 7A Climate Change Resiliency Regulations 6-2 6.3 Chapter 91 Waterways License 6-5 6.4 NPDES Permit 6-6 7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 7-1 7.1 Publicly Accessible Open Space 7-1 7.2 Passive House Mitigation Commitments 7-1 7.3 Climate Change Adaptation & Resiliency 7-2 7.4 Transportation 7-2 7.5 Stormwater Management 7-4 7.6 Erosion and Sediment Prevention 7-5 7.7 Environmental Justice 7-6 7.7.1 Vulnerable Heath Criteria 7-6 7.7.2 Potential Sources of Pollution 7-7 7.7.3 RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards 7-7 7.7.4 Construction 7-7 Literature Referenced Appendices Appendix A Locus Maps Figure 1: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Figure 3: MassGIS Orthophoto Map Table of Contents Appendix B Proposed Residential Development, Leefort Terrace Salem, MA, prepared by Bohler, dated July 1, 2022 Appendix C 124 Unit Plan Filed with the ZBA and Conservation Commission, 124 Unit Preferred Plan Appendix D Proposed Residential Development, Lee Fort Terrace Salem, MA, prepared by Vanasse & Associates, Inc., dated March 2022 Appendix E PHIUS+ 2018 Verification Baseline WUFI Report Prepared by Linnean Solutions PHIUS+ 2018 Verification Proposed WUFI Report Prepared by Linnean Solutions Appendix F Climate Resilience Design Standards RMAT Tool Output Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Appendix G Existing Flood Surge Existing Flood Recession prepared by Bohler Proposed Flood by Elevation Band Proposed Flood Surge Proposed Flood Recession prepared by Bohler Appendix H Figure 2: EJ Populations within 1 Mile, Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Advance Notice & Environmental Screening Form, Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Department of Public Health Salem - EJ Report, Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. EPA EJ Screen Report, Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Appendix I Site Plans Leefort Terrace Salem, MA, Zoning Board of Appeals, Issue date July 27, 2022 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office Amended January 1, 2022 Environmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name:Leefort Terrace Street Address:1 &2 Lee Fort Terrace Municipality:Salem Watershed:North Coastal Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates:Latitude:N 42.52637 Longitude:W 70.88219 Estimated commencement date:Fall 2023 Estimated completion date:Winter 2025 Project Type:Residential Status of project design:75 %complete Proponents:BC Leefort Terrace LLC c/o Beacon Communities LLC Street Address:2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 Municipality:Boston State:MA Zip Code:02108 Name of Contact Person:Ann M. Marton Firm/Agency:LEC Environmental Street Address:380 Lowell Street, Suite 101 Municipality:Wakefield State:MA Zip Code:01880 Phone:781-245-2500 Fax:781-245-6677 E-mail:amarton@lecenvironmental.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? Yes No If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF)(see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8))Yes No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09)Yes No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11)Yes No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11)Yes No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? 301 CMR 11.03 (3) (b) 1.f.Alteration of ½acre or more of Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage within Waterway Jurisdiction Which State Agency Permits will the project require? DEP Waterway License for Water Dependent Use in Commonwealth Tidelands Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: Federal LIHTC Equity $28,923,494 State LIHTC Equity 8,200,000 DHCD Soft Funds 3,000,000 HOME Funds 500,000 City of Salem CPA Funds 200,000 MassSave PassiveHouse Rebate 310,000 Brownfields Funds for Asbestos Abatement 750,000 -2 - Summary of Project Size & Environmental Impacts Existing Change Total LAND Total site acreage 3.42± New acres of land altered 3.42± Acres of impervious area 1.90±-0.13±1.77± Square feet of new bordering vegetated wetlands alteration 0 Square feet of new other wetland alteration 54,696±(LSCSF) Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways 0 STRUCTURES Gross square footage 27,500±SF +104,138±SF 131,638±SF Number of housing units 50 +74 124 Maximum height (feet)15 +37±52± TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day 162 +286 448 Parking spaces 14 +86 100 WASTEWATER Water Use (Gallons per day)6,163±+19,322±25,485± Water withdrawal (GPD)6,163±+19,322±25,485± Wastewater generation/treatment (GPD) 5,602±17,566±23,168± Length of water mains (miles)0 0 0 Length of sewer mains (miles)0 0 0 Has this project been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EEA #)No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EEA #)No,not to our knowledge. -3 - GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION –all proponents must fill out this section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: The 3.42± acre Project Site, located on the Salem Neck,consists of two parcels (Assessor’s Map 41, Lots 242 and 249)and Lee Fort Terrace,a 40-foot-wide private paved roadway,between Szetela Lane to the north and Fort Avenue to the south.The Project Site is located between downtown Salem and the Salem Willows,approximately 1.8 miles from the commuter rail station in Salem and 2 miles from the commuter rail station in Beverly.Memorial Park, Irzyk Park, and Bentley Academy Innovation School are located to the east,while residential dwellings along Fort Avenue, the David J.Beattie Park, and the Footprint Power Salem Harbor Station occur to the south. Various commercial or underutilized/vacant parcels, a newly created multi-modal path, and additional single and multi-family dwellings along Fort Avenue and Webb Street are located to the west.Collins Cove,Szetela Lane, and the new multi-modal path occur to the north. The Project Site is owned and managed by the Salem Housing Authority and contains seven, one-story brick buildings containing 50 obsolete,garden style,one-bedroom units,and one community building that provides coin-operated laundry facilities and a management office. The remainder of the Project Site contains lawn with scattered mature shade trees, and incidental clusters of shrubs.Topography throughout the Project Site is generally flat,ranging from elevation 7 to elevation 10 (NAVD 88),descending from Fort Avenue toward Szetela Lane. The entire project site,except for the buildings above elevation 10,is located within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage.Water,sewer,gas,and electricity all are available within Fort Avenue. Drainage and additional utilities also are available within Szetela Lane. The existing Leefort Terrace development was constructed in 1958 and is currently a Chapter 667 state public housing development providing housing for elderly and disabled residents. The units are subsidized by the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) through the state public housing operating and capital subsidy formula, which is insufficient to cover capital upgrades.All residential units are currently at or near the coastal floodplain elevation and at significant and increasing risk of storm related flooding and Sea Level Rise (SLR). The Project Site is located within an area designated as an Environmental Justice (EJ) community and is within 1 mile of several other areas designated as EJ communities.See Section 5.8.1 of the supplemental Expanded ENF Report for a detailed listing of the census block groups for these EJ communities. Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: The Proponent proposes to demolish the existing brick buildings and the Lee Fort Terrace private roadway,and construct 124 new 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments within a U-shaped building with two connecting east and west wings.The building will be all electric, Passive House certified with on-site solar PV and will be built above the current floodplain with residential units at elevations well above the 2070 project SLR. The entire development will be universally designed for use by all residents and seven units will be fully handicap accessible ADA units and three additional units will be adapted for sensory impairments.Additional resident amenities include outdoor resident community terraces,multi-use lawn,bocce courts,and a victory garden. Vehicular access is provided via Fort Avenue. Parking consists of 86 covered garage parking spaces and 14 surface parking spaces south of the building.The U-shaped building is centrally located on the Project Site with resident amenities, site access, and surface parking south of the building, all located greater than 250 linear feet from Collins Cove,landward of the landlocked tidelands line and completely outside the 100-foot Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank. -4 - NOTE:The project description should summarize both the project’s direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent,duration and frequency,and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these requirements into the future. Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning, and the reasons(s)that they were not selected as the preferred alternative: The Proponent considered the no-build alternative,a 214 unit alternative,a 124 unit connecting wing alternative,and the current 124 unit preferred plan.See Section 4.0 and Appendix I of the Expanded ENF Report for additional detail. NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters and/or siting of a project,or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations, alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative: The Proponent proposes to demolish the existing brick buildings within 250 feet of the shoreline within Commonwealth Tidelands, and create a 1.26±acre publicly accessible open space fronting on Collins Cove. The publicly accessible open space facing Collins Cove incorporates native and naturalized species of deciduous canopy trees,small trees,shrubs, and ground cover listed by Coastal Zone Management and UMass Amherst as tolerant and adapted to growing in coastal environments.Additionally,specific pollinator seed mixes were selected for the open space meadows and elevated (dry)or depressed (wet)landforms.The open space includes bio-retention cells,to collect rainwater from surrounding areas and impervious surfaces and to provide infiltration.A wide array of seating types will accommodate a diverse group of users and activities. Seating includes game/café tables,armchair seating, wooden benches, picnic tables,and timber hammock posts. Additional public amenities include designated areas for public art/sculpture, pedestrian scale lighting,bike racks, trash and recycling receptacles,and dog waste bag dispensers. Private residential amenities south of the proposed building include a multi-use lawn,courtyards with seating,bocce courts,robust landscaping,and a victory garden. Grades on the north side of the building have been built up to offer some future protection from flooding.The project has been designed and graded to elevate the majority of the site well above the current floodplain elevation 10 NAVD 88,with only portions of the public open space facing Collins Cove,the site entranceway off Fort Avenue,and a few surface parking spaces located at or below elevation 10.SLR projects for 2070 range from elevation 13.5 to 14.5 NAVD 88. The parking garage level is designed at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and Community space at elevation 14,and the lowest floor of any residential unit at or above elevation 21.The site design includes a decrease in impervious area by 5,800±SF and five LID bio-retention cells that will decrease run- off and allow for greater infiltration than under current conditions. The all electric building has been designed to meet Passive House (PHIUS+)certification with the goal to reduce operational carbon-emissions through energy efficient design and then incorporate onsite renewable energy generation (solar PV)and designed with as many carbon sequestration and regenerative materials as feasible,with the aim to minimize embodied carbon.To the extent financially viable,the development aims to include backup battery in order to become a resilience hub by providing reliable backup power to the community in the case of a power outage. If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: The project will not be constructed in phases. -5 - AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? Yes (Specify__________________________________) No if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan? ___ Yes ___No; If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan. _______________________________________________________ Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC? ___ Yes No; If yes,describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC._________________________________________________ RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species?(see http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm) Yes (Specify:)No HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes (Specify__________________________________)No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources?Yes (Specify__________________________________)No WATER RESOURCES: Is there an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW)on or within a half-mile radius of the project site?Yes No;if yes, identify the ORW and its location. (NOTE:Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies,their tributaries, and bordering wetlands;active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP;certain waters within Areas of Critical Environmental Concern,and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.) Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site?Yes ___No;if yes, identify the water body and pollutant(s) causing the impairment:Beverly Harbor MA93-20 Category 4a Fecal Coliform EPA TMDL No.50122 Is the project within a medium or high stress basin,as established by the Massachusetts Water Resources Commission?___Yes No STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Generally,describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations: The Stormwater Management System has been designed to include structural Best Management Practices (BMPs)in order to comply with the DEP’s Stormwater Management Handbook and Performance Standards at 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k).The Project qualifies as a “redevelopment,”and since the Site is located within LSCSF,certain stormwater standards do not apply and will be met to the greatest extent practicable.The redevelopment design and proposed stormwater improvements and BMPs include a reduction in impervious surface by 5,800±SF,deep sump hooded catch basins and one proprietary treatment unit prior to discharge to LID bio-retention cells,5 bio-retention cells planted with shrubs and seed mixes designed to meet MassDEP water quality standard #4, and a new Long-term Operation and Maintenance Plan.The stormwater management and drainage analysis are contained in the Drainage Report prepared by Bohler Engineering (Appendix B). MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN: Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21E or the Massachusetts? Contingency Plan?___Yes No;if yes, please describe the current status of the site (including Release -6 - Tracking Number (RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification):_______________ Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) on any portion of the project site?___Yes No; if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL:_______________. Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN? ___Yes No; if yes, please describe:____________________________________ SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE: If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction,describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick,concrete, gypsum,metal,wood: The Proponent will raze the eight existing one-story brick buildings and remove the existing Lee Fort Terrace private asphalt roadway. All demolition and disposal will be conducted in accordance with the Solid Waste Management Regulations (310 CMR 19.017)for reuse,recycling or disposal. (NOTE: Asphalt pavement,brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills. See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.) Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials?Yes ___No;if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhom01.htm Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment: During construction, contractors will be required to adhere to Massachusetts General Law Ch. 90,Section 16A and 3.10 CMR 7.11, which prohibits the idling of engines of stopped vehicles in excess of five minutes except for concrete trucks which are excluded from this requirement while mixing and pouring concrete. DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER: Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River?___Yes No; if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes,does the project have the potential to impact any of the “outstandingly remarkable” resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River? Yes ___ No ___ ;if yes,specify name of river and designation: _____________; if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated “outstandingly remarkable” resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. Yes ___ No ___ ; if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the “outstandingly remarkable” resources or stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed. ATTACHMENTS: 1.List of all attachments to this document. 2.U.S.G.S.map (good quality color copy, 8-½ x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating the project location and boundaries. 3..Plan, at an appropriate scale,of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs,showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots,railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland,steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 4 Plan, at an appropriate scale,depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species,Areas of Critical Environmental Concern,Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas, Article 97 lands, wetland resource area delineations,water supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts. -7 - 5.Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if construction of the project is proposed to be phased,there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 6.List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF,in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 7.List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable. 8.Printout of output report from RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool, available here. 9.Printout from the EEA EJ Maps Viewer showing the project location relative to Environmental Justice (EJ) Populations located in whole or in part within a 1-mile and 5-mile radius of the project site. -8 - LAND SECTION –all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds /Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) Yes No;if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A.Describe, in acres,the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Footprint of buildings 0.63±+0.12±0.76± Internal roadway 0.45±-0.45±0 Parking and other paved areas 0.82±+0.19±1.01± Other altered areas 1.68±+0.13 ±1.81± Undeveloped areas 0 0 0 Total: Project Site Acreage 03.58±1 0 03.58±1 1. The 3.58±“total Site Acreage”includes 0.16±acres of improvements within the ROW to Szetela Lane. B.Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? ___Yes No; if yes,how many acres of land in agricultural use (with prime state or locally important agricultural soils) will be converted to nonagricultural use? C.Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? ___Yes No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation: D.Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resource purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ___ Yes No; if yes,describe: D.Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction,agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? ___Yes No;if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction?___Yes ___No; if yes, describe: F.Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A?___ Yes No; if yes, describe: G.Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121B?___Yes No; if yes,describe: III.Consistency A.Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan Title:City of Salem Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Date 2014 Title:Climate Action Plan for Salem Date 2020 B.Describe the project’s consistency with that plan with regard to: 1)economic development The project will result in redevelopment of an existing affordable housing property owned by the Salem Housing Authority to Passive House (PHIUS) standards and provide much needed additional affordable housing,create 1.26±acres of waterfront publicly accessible open space. 2)adequacy of infrastructure The Proposed Project will rely on connections to the public sewer,water, and electric systems.These utilities are adequate to service this project. -9 - 3)open space impacts Creation of 1.26±acres of publicly accessible open space. 4)compatibility with adjacent land uses Surrounding land uses include single-family and multi-family residential dwellings,an elementary school, and newly paved multi-modal path. C.Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency (RPA) RPA:Metropolitan Area Planning Council Title:Metropolitan Area Planning Council Regional Plan Date May 2008 D.Describe the project’s consistency with that plan with regard to: 1)economic development The project will result in redevelopment of an existing affordable housing property owned by the Salem Housing Authority and provide much needed additional affordable housing,and create 1.26±acres of waterfront publicly accessible open space. 2)adequacy of infrastructure The Proposed Project will rely on connections to the public sewer,water, and electric systems.These utilities are adequate to service this project. 3)open space impacts Creation of 1.26±acres of publicly accessible open space. -10 - RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds /Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))?___Yes No;if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: (NOTE:If you are uncertain,it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)prior to submitting the ENF.) B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat?___Yes No C.Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat (Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)?Yes No. D.If you answered "No" to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A.Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)?Yes ___No.If yes, 1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)?Yes ___No; if yes, have you received a determination as to whether the project will result in the “take” of a rare species?Yes ___No.; if yes,attach the letter of determination to this submission. 2.Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened,and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)?___Yes No;if yes,provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts. 3.Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? 4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act?___Yes No 4.If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project?Yes ___ No;if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations?Yes ___No B.Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)?___Yes No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: -11 - WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))?Yes ___ No; if yes, specify,in quantitative terms: 54,696 SF of work within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage,a ½acre or more of which occurs within jurisdictional landlocked Commonwealth tidelands. B.Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions)related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands?Yes ___ No; if yes,specify which permit: Water-dependent Use Waterways License Waterways License and Local Order of Conditions C.If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II.Wetlands Impacts and Permits A.Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.131A)?Yes ___No;if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed?Yes ___ No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number:5-3-2022 DEP File #064-0756;if yes,has a local Order of Conditions been issued?___Yes No; Was the Order of Conditions appealed?___ Yes No.Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations?___Yes No. B.Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on the project site:The entire project except for the buildings that are slightly elevated above the floodplain (elevation 10 NAVD 88)are located within LSCSF. C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area (square feet) or Temporary or Length (linear feet)Permanent Impact? Land Under the Ocean _____________________________________ Designated Port Areas _____________________________________ Coastal Beaches _____________________________________ Coastal Dunes _____________________________________ Barrier Beaches _____________________________________ Coastal Banks _____________________________________ Rocky Intertidal Shores _____________________________________ Salt Marshes _____________________________________ Land Under Salt Ponds _____________________________________ Land Containing Shellfish _____________________________________ Fish Runs _____________________________________ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage 54,696 54,696 Inland Wetlands Bank (lf) Bordering Vegetated Wetlands Isolated Vegetated Wetlands _____________________________________ Land under Water _____________________________________ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding _____________________________________ Bordering Land Subject to Flooding Riverfront Area D.Is any part of the project: 1.proposed as a limited project? ___Yes No;if yes,what is the area (in sf)?____ -12 - 2. the construction or alteration of a dam?___Yes No; if yes, describe: 3.fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? ___ Yes No 4.dredging or disposal of dredged material?___ Yes No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW)or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? ___ Yes No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order?___ Yes No;if yes, identify the area (in sf): 7.located in buffer zones?Yes ___No;if yes,how much (in sf)4,850±SF of the site is within the outer limits of the Buffer Zone to the Top of Coastal Bank. E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw?Yes ___ No 2.alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law?___ Yes No; if yes, what is the area (sf)? III.Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A.Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands)that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91?Yes ___No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site?___Yes No; if yes, list the date and license or permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands: B.Does the project require a new or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91?Yes ___No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water-dependent use?Current 0 Change 0 Total 0 If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures (in sf)?0 C.For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following: Area of filled tidelands on the site: Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings: For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands? ___ Yes No Height of building on filled tidelands Also show the following on a site plan:Mean High Water,Mean Low Water, Water- dependent Use Zone,location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water marks. D.Is the project located on landlocked tidelands?Yes ___No; if yes, describe the project’s impact on the public’s right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: The 1.26±acres of landlocked tidelands will convert a private roadway,residential units,surrounding yards,and parking to publicly accessible open space. A crosswalk across Szetela Lane connects the open space to the existing bike multi- modal parallel to Collins Cove. E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations?___Yes No; if yes,describe the project’s impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the project will implement to avoid,minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR?___Yes No; (NOTE: If yes,then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and -13 - Determination.) G.Does the project include dredging? ___Yes No; if yes,answer the following questions: What type of dredging?Improvement ___Maintenance ___Both ____ What is the proposed dredge volume,in cubic yards (cys)_________ What is the proposed dredge footprint ____length (ft)___width (ft)____depth (ft); Will dredging impact the following resource areas? Intertidal Yes__No__; if yes, ___sq ft Outstanding Resource Waters Yes__No__; if yes,___sq ft Other resource area (i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds)Yes__ No__;if yes __ sq ft If yes to any of the above,have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1) avoidance;2)if avoidance is not possible,minimization;3)if either avoidance or minimize is not possible, mitigation? If no to any of the above,what information or documentation was used to support this determination? Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b).Physical and chemical data of the sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. Sediment Characterization Existing gradation analysis results? __Yes ___No:if yes, provide results. Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6? ___Yes ____No;if yes,provide results. Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option. Beach Nourishment ___ Unconfined Ocean Disposal ___ Confined Disposal: Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD) ___ Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) ___ Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 ___ Shoreline Placement ___ Upland Material Reuse____ In-State landfill disposal____ Out-of-state landfill disposal ____ (NOTE: This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.) IV. Consistency: A.Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within the Coastal Zone?Yes ___;if yes,describe these effects and the projects consistency with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: Grades on the north side of the building have been built up to offer some future protection from flooding.The project has been designed and graded to elevate the majority of the site well above the current floodplain elevation 10 NAVD 88,with only portions of the public open space facing Collins Cove,the site entranceway off Fort Avenue,and a few surface parking spaces located at or below elevation 10.SLR projects for 2070 range from elevation 13.5 to 14.5 NAVD 88. The parking garage level is designed at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and Community space at elevation 14, and the lowest residential level at elevation 21.The site design includes a decrease in impervious area by 5,800±SF and five LID bio-retention cells that will decrease run-off and allow for greater infiltration than under current conditions. The publicly accessible open space facing Collins Cove incorporates native and naturalized species of deciduous trees,small trees,shrubs, and ground cover listed by Coastal Zone Management and UMass Amherst as tolerant and adapted to growing in coastal environments. B.Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan?___Yes No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: -14 - WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))?___Yes No;if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply?___Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section.If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II.Impacts and Permits A.Describe, in gallons per day (gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Municipal or regional water supply ________________ Withdrawal from groundwater Withdrawal from surface water ________________________ Interbasin transfer ________________________ (NOTE:Interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from the source will be discharged.) B.If the source is a municipal or regional supply,has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project?___ Yes ___No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, has a pumping test been conducted?___Yes ___ No;if yes,attach a map of the drilling sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results. D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons per day)?Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?___Yes ___ No; if yes, then how much of an increase (gpd)? E.Does the project site currently contain a water supply well,a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? ___Yes ___ No. If yes,describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Flow Daily Flow Capacity of water supply well(s)(gpd) Capacity of water treatment plant (gpd) F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved,what is the direction of the transfer,and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve: 1.new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district?___Yes ___ No 2.a Watershed Protection Act variance?___Yes ___ No;if yes,how many acres of alteration? 3.a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities?___Yes ___ No III.Consistency Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources,quality, facilities and services: -15 - WASTEWATER SECTION I.Thresholds / Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater (see 301 CMR 11.03(5))?___ Yes No; if yes,specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? ___Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No"to both questions A and B,proceed to the Transportation --Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II.Impacts and Permits A. Describe the volume (in gallons per day)and type of disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems): Existing Change Total Discharge of sanitary wastewater ________________________ Discharge of industrial wastewater ________________________ TOTAL ________________________ Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater ________________________ Discharge to outstanding resource water ________________________ Discharge to surface water ________________________ Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater facility ________________________ TOTAL ________________________ B.Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity?___Yes ___ No; if yes,then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project’s wastewater flows: C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity?___ Yes___No;if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project’s wastewater flows: D.Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility,sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? ___Yes ___ No; if yes,describe as follows: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Daily Flow Wastewater treatment plant capacity (in gallons per day)_______________________________ E.If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater,which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new? (NOTE:Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is located.) F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority -16 - (MWRA) or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? ___ Yes ___ No G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, wastewater reuse (gray water)or other sewage residual materials? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes,what is the capacity (tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage ________________________ Treatment ________________________ Processing ________________________ Combustion ________________________ Disposal ________________________ H. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project,and other wastewater mitigation,such as infiltration and inflow removal. III.Consistency A.Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: B.If the project requires a sewer extension permit,is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan?___ Yes ___ No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan: -17 - TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION) I. Thresholds / Permit A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___Yes No; if yes,specify,in quantitative terms: B.Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways?___ Yes No;if yes,specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section.If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. II. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces ______________________ Number of vehicle trips per day ________________________ ITE Land Use Code(s):________________________ B.What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existing Change Total 1.___________________________________________ 2. ____________________________________________ 3. ____________________________________________ C. If applicable,describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the project proponent will implement: D.How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and services to provide access to and from the project site? C.Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA) that provides transportation demand management (TDM) services in the area of the project site? ____ Yes ____ No;if yes,describe if and how will the project will participate in the TMA: D.Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail,or air transportation facilities? ____ Yes ____No; if yes, generally describe: E.If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7) and a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (CFR Title 14 Part 77.13,forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)? III.Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state,and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: -18 - TRANSPORTATION SECTION (ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES) I.Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___Yes No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B.Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities?___Yes No;if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes"to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II.Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site: B.Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? 2.Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? III.Consistency --Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit,pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan,and the State Pedestrian Plan: -19 - ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds /Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? ___ Yes No; if yes,specify, in quantitative terms: B.Does the project require any state permits related to energy?___Yes No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B,proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts)________________________ Length of fuel line (in miles)________________________ Length of transmission lines (in miles)________________________ Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts)________________________ B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are: 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2.the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way?___Yes ___No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III.Consistency Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: 20 AIR QUALITY SECTION I.Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR 11.03(8))?___Yes No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? ___ Yes No;if yes, specify which permit: C.If you answered "No" to both questions A and B,proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B,fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II.Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)?___ Yes ___ No;if yes,describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day)of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter ________________________ Carbon monoxide ________________________ Sulfur dioxide ________________________ Volatile organic compounds ________________________ Oxides of nitrogen ________________________ Lead ________________________ Any hazardous air pollutant ________________________ Carbon dioxide ________________________ B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality,including noise impacts: III.Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B.Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state,regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: 21 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I.Thresholds /Permits A.Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? ___ Yes No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B.Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste?___ Yes No;if yes,specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B,proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section.If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage,treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste?___Yes ___No;if yes,what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage ________________________ Treatment, processing ________________________ Combustion ________________________ Disposal ________________________ B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage,recycling,treatment or disposal of hazardous waste? ___Yes ___No;if yes,what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage ________________________ Recycling ________________________ Treatment ________________________ Disposal ________________________ C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example,during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use,recycling,and disposal: D.If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? ___ Yes ___No E.Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: 22 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I.Thresholds / Impacts A.Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission?___ Yes No; if yes, attach correspondence.For project sites involving lands under water,have you consulted with the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources?____Yes No;if yes,attach correspondence B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure,or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth?____Yes No; if yes,does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure?___Yes ___ No; if yes,please describe: C.Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth?____Yes No;if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site?___ Yes ___No; if yes, please describe: D. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A, B and C,proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes" to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. II. Impacts Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal,state,regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: 23 CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCY SECTION This section of the Environmental Notification Form (ENF) solicits information and disclosures related to climate change adaptation and resiliency, in accordance with the MEPA Interim Protocol on Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency (the “MEPA Interim Protocol”), effective October 1,2021. The Interim Protocol builds on the analysis and recommendations of the 2018 Massachusetts Integrated State Hazard Mitigation and Climate Adaptation Plan (SHMCAP),and incorporates the efforts of the Resilient Massachusetts Action Team (RMAT), the inter-agency steering committee responsible for implementation, monitoring,and maintenance of the SHMCAP,including the “Climate Resilience Design Standards and Guidelines”project. The RMAT team recently released the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool, which is available here. The MEPA Interim Protocol is intended to gather project-level data in a standardized manner that will both inform the MEPA review process and assist the RMAT team in evaluating the accuracy and effectiveness of the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool. Once this testing process is completed, the MEPA Office anticipates developing a formal Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Policy through a public stakeholder process. Questions about the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool can be directed to rmat@mass.gov. All Proponents must complete the following section, referencing as appropriate the results of the output report generated by the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool and attached to the ENF. In completing this section, Proponents are encouraged, but not required at this time,to utilize the recommended design standards and associated Tier 1/2/3 methodologies outlined in the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool to analyze the project design. However,Proponents are requested to respond to a respond to a user feedback survey on the RMAT website or to provide feedback to rmat@mass.gov, which will be used by the RMAT team to further refine the tool.Proponents are also encouraged to consult general guidance and best practices as described in the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Guidelines. Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Strategies I.Has the project taken measures to adapt to climate change for all of the climate parameters analyzed in the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool (sea level rise/storm surge,extreme precipitation (urban or riverine flooding), extreme heat)?Yes __ No Note: Climate adaptation and resiliency strategies include actions that seek to reduce vulnerability to anticipated climate risks and improve resiliency for future climate conditions. Examples of climate adaptation and resiliency strategies include flood barriers,increased stormwater infiltration, living shorelines, elevated infrastructure,increased tree canopy, etc. Projects should address any planning priorities identified by the affected municipality through the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) program or other planning efforts, and should consider a flexible adaptive pathways approach, an adaptation best practice that encourages design strategies that adapt over time to respond to changing climate conditions. General guidance and best practices for designing for climate risk are described in the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Guidelines. A. If no,explain why. B. If yes,describe the measures the project will take, including identifying the planning horizon and climate data used in designing project components. If applicable, specify the return period and design storm used (e.g., 100-year, 24-hour storm). The Project Proponent has incorporated measures, as feasible,to adapt to climate change for sea-based flooding and SLR,extreme precipitation and extreme heat.Such measures include: Designing the parking garage at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and Community space at elevation 14, and the lowest residential unit at elevation 21; 24 Elevating the grades on the north side of the building to offer some future protection from flooding. Creating swales and other landscape features on the Cove side of the project to contain, divert, and infiltrate potential flood waters; Bioretention areas providing infiltration as well as serving as pretreatment of stormwater runoff, Increasing the tree canopy across tree caliper sizes to expand shading of both publicly accessible open space and the resident courtyard; Reducing impervious surface on the site to reduce heat island effect and improve rain water infiltration; Designing the building envelope to meet Passive House (PHIUS) standards to reduce heating and cooling loads during extreme weather events; and Designing efficient mechanical systems to reduce overall energy loads. These and other strategies will help improve resilience and livability for existing and new residents and improve residents’ abilities to withstand flooding, severe weather, and other unpredictable hazards. Lastly, the Proponent has incorporated environmentally sensitive and sustainable design, planning,and building techniques and energy efficiency measures as detailed in Sections 3.0, 5.0, and 7.0 of the supplemental Expanded ENF Report. C.Is the project contributing to regional adaptation strategies?__ Yes No; If yes, describe. II.Has the Proponent considered alternative locations for the project in light of climate change risks? ___ Yes No A.If no,explain why.The property is currently owned by the Salem Housing Authority and they are not in a position to acquire additional land elsewhere to provide the much-needed replacement and additional affordable housing in the City of Salem. B. If yes,describe alternatives considered. III.Is the project located in Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF) or Bordering Land Subject to Flooding (BLSF)as defined in the Wetlands Protection Act?Yes __No The entire project site,except for the buildings above elevation 10,is located within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage. If yes, describe how/whether proposed changes to the site’s topography (including the addition of fill) will result in changes to floodwater flow paths and/or velocities that could impact adjacent properties or the functioning of the floodplain.General guidance on providing this analysis can be found in the CZM/MassDEP Coastal Wetlands Manual,available here. The project site is positioned between the Salem Harbor and Collins Cove and as such, floodwaters approach the site from both directions.The proposed site grading will not alter the flow paths as illustrated on the attached Flood Surge and Flood Recession exhibits (Appendix G).Additionally, the proposed site grading does not channelize floodwaters so there are no anticipated changes to existing floodwater velocities. 25 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE SECTION I.Identifying Characteristics of EJ Populations A.If an Environmental Justice (EJ) population has been identified as located in whole or in part within 5 miles of the project site, describe the characteristics of each EJ populations as identified in the EJ Maps Viewer (i.e., the census block group identification number and EJ characteristics of “Minority,” “Minority and Income,” etc.).Provide a breakdown of those EJ populations within 1 mile of the project site, and those within 5 miles of the site. See Breakdown in Section 5.8.1 of the supplemental Expanded ENF Report. B.Identify all languages identified in the “Languages Spoken in Massachusetts” tab of the EJ Maps Viewer as spoken by 5 percent or more of the EJ population who also identify as not speaking English “very well.” The languages should be identified for each census tract located in whole or in part within 1 mile and 5 miles of the project site, regardless of whether such census tract contains any designated EJ populations. According to the EJ Maps Viewer, languages spoken by 5% or more of residents who identify as not speaking English “very well”within 5 miles of the Project Site include: Portuguese or Portuguese Creole, Spanish or Spanish Creole,and French Creole or Haitian Creole. C.If the list of languages identified under Section I.B. has been modified with approval of the EEA EJ Director, provide a list of approved languages that the project will use to provide public involvement opportunities during the course of MEPA review. If the list has been expanded by the Proponent (without input from the EEA EJ Director),provide a list of the additional languages that will be used to provide public involvement opportunities during the course of MEPA review as required by Part II of the MEPA Public Involvement Protocol for Environmental Justice Populations (“MEPA EJ Public Involvement Protocol”). If the project is exempt from Part II of the protocol, please specify. II.Potential Effects on EJ Populations A.If an EJ population has been identified using the EJ Maps Viewer within 1 mile of the project site,describe the likely effects of the project (both adverse and beneficial) on the identified EJ population(s). See Section 5.8.2 of the supplemental Expanded ENF Report. B.If an EJ population has been identified using the EJ Maps Viewer within 5 miles of the project site, will the project: (i)meet or exceed MEPA review thresholds under 301 CMR 11.03(8)(a)- (b) __ Yes No; or (ii) generate150 or more new average daily trips (adt) of diesel vehicle traffic, excluding public transit trips, over a duration of 1 year or more. ___ Yes No C.If you answered “Yes” to either question in Section II.B., describe the likely effects of the project (both adverse and beneficial) on the identified EJ population(s). III.Public Involvement Activities A.Provide a description of activities conducted prior to filing to promote public involvement by EJ populations, in accordance with Part II of the MEPA EJ Public Involvement Protocol. In particular: 26 1.If advance notification was provided under Part II.A., attach a copy of the Environmental Justice Screening Form and provide list of CBOs/tribes contacted (with dates). Copies of email correspondence can be attached in lieu of a separate list. See attached June 28,2022 email correspondence contained in Appendix Hfor the advance notification,Environmental Justice Screening Form,and the message posted on the Proponent’s Leefort Terrace web page in English,Portuguese, Spanish,and Haitian Creole. 2.State how CBOs and tribes were informed of ways to request a community meeting, and if any meeting was requested. If public meetings were held, describe any issues of concern that were raised at such meetings, and any steps taken (including modifications to the project design) to address such concerns. CBOs and tribes were informed via the Environmental Justice Screening Form that provided contact information on how to reach the Leefort Terrace Development Director to obtain additional information or to schedule a meeting. No CBOs or tribes have responded to the notification.However, the Project Proponent has continued to respond to and meet with existing Leefort Terrace residents, neighbors, interested citizens,City and state officials, and regulatory agencies since distribution of the notification. 3.If the project is exempt from Part II of the protocol, please specify. B.Provide below (or attach) a distribution list (if different from the list in Section III.A. above) of CBOs and tribes, or other individuals or entities the Proponent intends to maintain for the notice of the MEPA Site Visit and circulation of other materials and notices during the course of MEPA review. The Proponent intends to use the same distribution list referenced above in Section III A. 1.and will continue to update this list, to the best of their ability,as others express interest in the project. C.Describe (or submit as a separate document) the Proponent’s plan to maintain the same level of community engagement throughout the MEPA review process, as conducted prior to filing.’’ The Proponent will continue to update the Leefort Terrace Website relative to the MEPA process,ZBA/Conservation Commission Public Hearings, and plan updates;and as needed,continue to engage Leefort residents, direct abutters,neighbors,members of the Salem community,and city and state elected and non-elected officials. The Proponent,SHA,and the development team continue to engage with those who have expressed concerns or interest in the Proposed Project,and the Proponent remains open to further adjustments in response to feedback, within the constraints of development feasibility and affordable housing production goals. 1 CERTIFICATIONS: 1. The Public Notice of Environmental Review has been/will be published in the following newspapers in accordance with 301 CMR 11.15(1): (Name) Salem News___________________(Date) August 24, 2022 2. This form has been circulated to Agencies and Persons in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). Signatures: 8/10/2022 Date Signature of Responsible Date Signature of person preparing Officer or Proponent ENF (if different from above) Josh Cohen, President Ann M. Marton, President Name (print or type) Name (print or type) BC Leefort Terrace LLC LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Firm/Agency Firm/Agency c/o Beacon Communities Corp. 2 Center Plaza, Site 700 380 Lowell Street, Suite 101 Street Street Boston, MA 02108 Wakefield, MA 01880 Municipality/State/Zip Municipality/State/Zip 617-574-1113 781-245-2500 Phone Phone 1 & 2 Leefort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ENF Distribution List Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Office MEPA@mass.gov Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner’s Office Helena.boccadoro@mass.gov Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office/MEPA Coordinator John.d.viola@mass.gov Massachusetts Department of Public Transportation Public/Private Development Unit MassDOTPPDU@dot.state.ma.us MassDOT District Office #4 Timothy.paris@dot.state.ma.us Massachusetts Historical Commission The MA Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Metropolitan Area Planning Council mpillsbury@mapc.org afelix@mapc.org Salem City Council mayor@salem.com Isimons@salem.com Salem Planning Board eeimert@Salem.com Salem Conservation Commission kkennedy@Salem.com Salem Board of Health mdavis@Salem.com Salem Zoning Board of Appeals dlaroe@Salem.com Coastal Zone Management Robert.boeri@mass.gov Patrice.bordonaro@mass.gov EEA EJ Director MEPA Office MEPA-EJ@mass.gov Department of Energy Resources Paul.ormond@mass.gov Brendan.place@mass.gov DMF-North Shore DMF.EnvReview-North@mass.gov Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem,Massachusetts August 15, 2022 Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts SUMMARY Page 1-1 1.0 SUMMARY The following provides a brief proposed summary,required permits and status, alternatives, and potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures. 1.1 Project Summary The Proponent proposes to demolish the eight existing obsolete,one-story brick buildings and the Lee Fort Terrace private roadway to construct 124 new 1-,2-, and 3-bedroom apartments within a U-shaped building with two connecting east and west wings.While the entire development will be universally designed for use by all residents, seven units will be fully ADA accessible and three additional units will be adapted for sensory impairments. Additional resident amenities include courtyard community terraces and seating,a multi-use lawn,bocce courts,robust landscaping,and a victory garden.Vehicular access will be provided via Fort Avenue.Parking consists of 86 covered garage parking spaces and 14 surface parking spaces south of the building.The U-shaped building is centrally located on the Project Site with resident amenities, site access, and surface parking south of the building, all located greater than 250 linear feet from Collins Cove,landward of the Landlocked Tidelands requiring a waterways license,and completely outside the 100-foot Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank. Within the Landlocked Tidelands,the Proponent proposes to create 1.26±acres of publicly accessible, water-dependent,open space fronting on Collins Cove.This open space includes bio-retention cells to collect rainwater from surrounding areas and impervious surfaces and to provide infiltration.A wide array of seating types will accommodate a diverse group of users and activities. Seating includes game/café tables, armchair seating, wooden benches, picnic tables,and timber hammock posts.Additional public amenities include designated areas for public art/sculpture,pedestrian scale lighting,bike racks, trash and recycling receptacles,and dog waste bag dispensers.Landscaping within the open space incorporates native and naturalized deciduous shade trees,small trees,shrubs, and ground cover listed by Coastal Zone Management and UMass Amherst as tolerant and adapted to growing in coastal environments.Specific pollinator seed mixes were selected for the open space meadows and elevated (dry)or depressed (wet)landforms. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts SUMMARY Page 1-2 1.2 Summary of Required Reviews,Permits,Approvals, and Actions The Proposed Project will require filing for several local and one state permit or approval,two of which have already been filed for the Proposed Project. Since 2020, the Proponent has been actively engaged with and receiving feedback and input from City of Salem and state elected and non-elected officials and staff,the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development (EOHED),the Department of Housing and Economic Development (DHCD),and participated in extensive outreach to the current Leefort Terrace residents, abutting property owners,and broader local community,as further detailed in Section 5.8.1. Additionally, the Proponent has been meeting with and receiving feedback from the Salem Zoning Board of Appeal (ZBA),Salem Planning Board,and the Salem Conservation Commission through the local permit process,and has participated in pre- application meetings with MA Department of Environmental Protection Waterways Program (MADEP Waterways),and the MEPA Unit to gain input and insight prior to entering the MEPA and Waterways License permit process. The below table summarizes each Permit/Approval, Agency, and Status of review, approval or action. Table 1 Required Environmental Reviews, Permits, Approvals or Actions Permit/Approval Agency/Party Status Local 40B Application for Comprehensive Permit Zoning Board of Appeals Filed April 8, 2022 Under Review Notice of Intent/Order of Conditions Conservation Commission Filed May 3, 2022 State Water-Dependent Use Waterways License MADEP Waterways To Be Filed December 2022 Federal NPDES Permit US Environmental Protection Agency Prior to Construction This project involves both State and Federal Financial Assistance from several entities as detailed on the ENF Form,and therefore, is subject to full scope MEPA jurisdiction. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts SUMMARY Page 1-3 1.3 Summary of Alternatives The Salem Housing Authority (SHA)and the Project Proponent have considered the No- Build Alternative,a 214 unit Alternative,and several iterations of what now is the Preferred Plan.Leefort Terrace was constructed in 1958 and is subsidized by the DHCD through the state public housing operating and capital subsidy formula, which is insufficient to cover capital upgrades.As a result, the No-Build Alternative is infeasible. The No-Build option also does not support the City of Salem or regional needs for additional affordable housing.The 214-unit plan involved several parcels of land west of the Project Site, that are not owned by the SHA and ultimately were deemed unsuitable for the Proposed Project.The Proponent filed a 124 unit alternative with the ZBA and Salem Conservation Commission, that has been further refined as the Preferred Alternative. Section 4.0 provides a more detailed discussion of each Alternative considered with a more detailed discussion of the Preferred Plan in Section 3.0. 1.4 Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation The Proposed Project will demolish the eight obsolete (circa 1958),1-story,brick buildings and remove the existing private roadway,and redevelop the entire Project Site by constructing a 124 affordable, 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom affordable apartment units with associated parking and amenities,and 1.26±acres of publicly accessible open space.The potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project include land, wetlands (LSCSF and filled tidelands),climate change adaptation and resiliency,greenhouse gases,and environmental justice. The following provides a summary of the potential environmental impacts and the mitigation measures that will be incorporated into the Proposed Project. The Proponent’s civil engineer,Bohler,has evaluated pre-and post-development drainage patterns and prepared a comprehensive stormwater management plan that complies with the DEP Stormwater Management Guidelines and 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k) of the Wetlands Protection Act Regulations.Bohler also has prepared an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Narrative and Plans, and a Draft Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).These documents and plans will be used by the site contractor during construction to ensure protection of the environment. The Proponent has incorporated efforts to avoid,minimize, and mitigate for impacts within LSCSF and filled tidelands,and comply with the relevant local,state,and federal wetland and waterways performance standards. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts SUMMARY Page 1-4 The building will be all electric, Passive House certified with on-site solar PV and will be built above the current floodplain with residential units at elevations well above the 2070 project SLR.The Proponent is committed to Passive House certification and exceeds all standards and requirements contained in the MEPA GHG Policy. While the project does not exceed any MEPA ENF thresholds requiring a traffic impact study,the Proponent retained Vanasse &Associates, Inc. (VAI)to prepare a Traffic Study for the ZBA process.The Project Proponent will implement the transportation improvement program recommended by VAI in their traffic report. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Page 2-1 2.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The approximately 3.42±acre Project Site, located on the Salem Neck,consists of two parcels (Assessor’s Map 41,Lots 242 and 249),and Lee Fort Terrace,a 40-foot-wide private paved roadway,between Szetela Lane to the north and Fort Avenue to the south, (Appendix A,Figure 1).The Project Site is located between downtown Salem and the Salem Willows,approximately 1.8 miles from the commuter rail station in Salem and 2 miles from the commuter rail station in Beverly.Memorial Park, Irzyk Park, and Bentley Academy Innovation School are located to the east,while residential dwellings along Fort Avenue,the David J.Beattie Park, and the Footprint Power Salem Harbor Station occur to the south.Various commercial or underutilized/vacant parcels, a newly created bike path, and additional single and multi-family dwellings along Fort Avenue and Webb Street are located to the west.Szetela Lane,the new multi-modal path, and Collins Cove occur the north. The existing Leefort Terrace development contains a private, paved roadway,seven one- story brick buildings containing 50 obsolete,garden style,one-bedroom units,and one community building that provides coin-operated laundry facilities and a management office.The remainder of the site contains lawn with scattered mature shade trees, and incidental patches of shrubs.Topography throughout the Project Site is generally flat, ranging from elevation 7 to elevation 10 (NAVD 88),descending from Fort Avenue toward Szetela Lane.Water, sewer,gas,and electricity all are available within Fort Avenue.Drainage and additional utilities also are available within Szetela Lane. 2.1 Wetland Resource Areas LEC conducted a site visit on November 13, 2020 to evaluate the boundaries of Wetland Resource Areas and determined that Coastal Bank and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF)are located on or adjacent to the Project Site.These boundaries were determined based on the regulatory definitions in the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L.c. 131, s. 40, the Act) and the Act Regulations 310 CMR 10.04 and 10.30,and the definition of Flood Zones/Floodplains under the City of Salem Chapter 50 Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance (effective March 28,2022,the Ordinance),and the Salem Wetlands Protection Regulations (effective April 19, 2022,Ordinance Regulations)as further described below.The 100-foot Buffer Zone also extends 100 feet horizontally from the Top of Coastal Bank, also described below. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Page 2-2 2.1.1 Coastal Bank According to 310 CMR 10.30 (2),Coastal Bank is as the seaward face or side of any elevated landform,other than a Coastal Dune, which lies at the landward edge of a Coastal Beach, land subject to tidal action, or other wetland. The sloping rip-rap shoreline along Collins Cove lies at the landward edge of a Coastal Beach and meets the definition of a Coastal Bank.The Top of Coastal Bank was delineated in accordance with DEP’s Program Policy 92-1, and includes areas with slopes that are greater than 10:1 (i.e.,greater than a 10% slope).The Coastal Bank is non- eroding and protected by rip rap.No work is proposed on the Coastal Bank. 2.1.2 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF) According to 310 CMR 10.04, Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage means land subject to any inundation caused by coastal storms up to and including that caused by the 100-year storm, surge of record or storm of record, whichever is greater. According to the Ordinance Regulations Flood Zones/Floodplains are areas of flood hazard designated by FEMA to represent the potential extent of flooding based on 100- year storms (e.g.a storm event that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year). Various zones are determined by topographical analysis performed under a Flood Insurance Study. Areas of Special Flood Hazard include Zones A,AE, AH, AO, AR,A99, V and VE while areas outside of the Special Flood Hazard Areas include Zones X unshaded (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% (500-year) annual chance floodplain) and D (areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible).The Base Flood Elevation is the elevation that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. According to the July 16,2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Essex County, Massachusetts (Community Panel 25009C 0419 G),the entire site is located within a mapped Zone AE (el.10,NAVD88) Areas subject to inundation by the 1% change annual flood (Appendix A, Figure 2). The FEMA 100-year floodplain mapping extends laterally across the entire Project Site; however,several of the existing buildings are slightly elevated above elevation 10. 2.1.3 100-foot Buffer Zone According to Section 6 of the Ordinance Regulations Buffer Zone is an area subject to protection under the Ordinance and is land extending 100 feet horizontally outward from the boundary of all the resource areas subject to protection under the Ordinance Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Page 2-3 (excluding Riverfront Area, Land Under Waters, Land Containing Shellfish, Fish Runs, Land Subject to Tidal Action, and Designated Port Areas).The Buffer Zone is not itself a resource area. The Ordinance Regulations also establish a 25-foot No Disturbance Zone and 50-foot Mitigation Zone.The 25-foot No Disturbance Zone and 50-foot Mitigation Zone are located north of the Project Site along Collins Cove with the 50-foot Mitigation Zone extending into the footprint of Szetela Lane.No work is proposed within these Zones except for potentially re-striping the existing pedestrian cross walk in Szetela Lane that connects the Project Site to the bituminous concrete multi-modal path and Collins Cove. 2.1.4 Filled Tidelands The Project Site contains Landlocked Tidelands.According to 310 CMR 9.02, Landlocked Tidelands means any filled tidelands which on January 1, 1984 were entirely separated by a public way from any flowed tidelands,except for that portion of such filled tidelands which are presently located:(a) within 250 feet of the high water mark… The Project Site is separated by Szetela Lane from flowed tidelands and the high water mark to Collins Cove.Therefore,Filled Tidelands on the Project Site are considered Landlocked Tidelands (Appendix A, Figure 3).Work within Landlocked Tidelands within 250 feet of the high water mark (el. 4.2)requires a Waterways License. 2.2 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Designation According to the 15th edition of the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (effective August 1,2021) published by the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP) and the MassGIS data layer,no areas of Estimated or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife or Certified Vernal Pools exist on the Project Site (Appendix A, Figure 3). 2.3 Traffic, Transit, and Pedestrian &Bicycle Transportation While the Proposed Project does not exceed any transportation thresholds,VAI prepared a Transportation Impact Assessment in March 2022 to evaluate potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed redevelopment of Leefort Terrace.The study evaluates the access requirements,potential off-site improvements,safety considerations, and identifies and analyzes existing and future traffic conditions, both with and without the Proposed Project. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Page 2-4 2.4 Historic Structures or Districts, and Archaeological Sites According to the MassGIS data layer for the State Register of Historic Places, no historic structures are present on the Project Site nor is the Project Site within a Historic District. However, as required,a copy of this filing has been provided to the Massachusetts Historic Commission for comment and review. 2.5 The Built Environment The existing Leefort Terrace development was constructed in 1958 and is currently a Chapter 667 state public housing development providing housing for elderly and disabled residents.The units are subsidized by the DHCD through the state public housing operating and capital subsidy formula, which is insufficient to cover capital upgrades. All residential units are currently at or near the coastal floodplain elevation and at significant and increasing risk of storm related flooding and SLR.None of the units are handicap accessible.Residents report continual problems with flooding, outdated kitchen and bath facilities, climate control, and pest issues resulting from the obsolete design and construction methods. 2.6 Existing Infrastructure (Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Electric) The Project Site is served by a 6-inch sanitary sewer main located within Leefort Terrace. This 6-inch main discharges to an existing 15-inch sewer pipe located in Fort Avenue. The Project Site is served by an 8-inch water main also located within Leefort Terrace. This existing line is serviced from an existing 16-inch water main in Fort Avenue. The Project Site is serviced by a series of overhead wires and utility poles located along Leefort Terrace.The overhead wires are serviced from a utility pole at the southeast corner of the site along Fort Avenue. 2.7 Environmental Justice Communities The Project Site is located within an area designated as an Environmental Justice (EJ) community and is within 1-mile of several other areas designated as EJ communities.See Section 5.8.1 for a detailed listing of the census block groups for these EJ communities. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-1 3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT Beginning in late 2020 and prior to creating a program and site plan for redevelopment of Leefort Terrace, the project team took a very deliberate and comprehensive approach to engaging Leefort residents, direct abutters, members of the Salem community,and city and state elected and non-elected officials.The project has received significant support and positive feedback from many community members as well as the Mayor, Planning Department, members of City Council,and the State Representative and Senator. The Proponent also engaged in a regenerative design approach, implemented with assistance from the Regenesis Group. This process focused first on developing a Story of Place by seeking to deepen our understanding of the many social and ecological interrelationships that make LeeFort Terrace, its immediate surroundings, and the City of Salem unique.The Proponent’s goal was to harmonize with these natural and social systems as we began to understand the story of place to inform the project design.As part of that process,the Proponent conducted one-on-one and small group kitchen table conversations,larger virtual community meetings,and presented to the Salem Sustainability, Energy and Resiliency Committee (See Section 5.8.1 for a listing of this outreach). From the Story of Place,the Proponent created the following Design Principles used to inform the site plan and building design: 1.Design structures and nature-based techniques that protect life while allowing the natural exchanges that enrich it. 2.This project is an opportunity to appreciate,celebrate, and integrate the resources of this place –including the residents and neighborhood. 3.Use this project to engage, reinforce, and make-real the motivating visions of Salem as a healthy living system. From the Story of Place and Design Principles,the following concepts for the redevelopment emerged:Fostering the resiliency and regeneration of Leefort Terrace, Salem Neck,and Salem.From the concept, the design team established a series of nested metrics for accomplishing this concept that demonstrate how the concepts will be applied to Leefort Terrace, while also engaging the community and City around the public space associated with Leefort Terrace and the underutilized adjacent parcels we expect that the City will eventually convert into passive public spaces, and aspiring to inspire the Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-2 community to apply the Design Principles City-wide to enhance the social and natural systems at play in Salem. Following the Story of Place and Design Principles the Proponent proposes to replace 50 obsolete,garden style apartments contained in seven, one-story brick buildings and a one- story brick community building with 124 new apartments in a U-shaped building with two connected wings,community and leasing space,garage and surface parking, courtyard community space,and new publicly accessible open space. 3.1 New Building &Courtyard Resident Community Space The Proponent proposes to construct 124 new 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments within a single U-shaped building with an East Wing and West Wing.While the entire development will be universally designed for use by all residents, seven units will be fully ADA accessible and three additional units will be adapted for sensory impairments. The building is a four-story structure over garage parking,with the southern end of the West Wing stepping down to three stories.The building includes an elevator in each wing extending from the garage to the top levels,garage level bike storage,a leasing office,lobby,fitness room,and community room (See Site Plans,Appendix I). As part of the new construction, the eight existing brick buildings and Lee Fort Terrace will be demolished and removed. All building and pavement materials will be reused or recycled, as feasible.The new U-shaped building is centrally located on the Project Site slightly greater than 250 linear feet from the high water mark to Collins Cove and completely outside the 100-foot Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank.The East and West Wings and resident community courtyard space have been oriented with consideration of the predominant easterly winter wind direction and southerly solar sun exposure.The West Wing of the building descends in height as it extends southerly towards the adjacent residential dwellings along Fort Avenue.Additional private residential amenities south of the proposed building include courtyard resident community terraces and seating,a multi-use lawn,bocce courts,robust landscaping with native or naturalized species,and a victory garden. A number of site constraints and design considerations directly influenced and contributed towards the design and architectural character of the Proposed Project,and the layout of the building, parking,resident amenity space, and publicly accessible open space.These constraints include the presence of Filled Tidelands and required shoreline setbacks,the 100-year floodplain, SLR and coastal resiliency, side yard setbacks, and proximity to abutting residences. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-3 With these constraints in mind, the building has been sited and organized greater than 250 feet from the Collins Cove high water mark,and all residential units are elevated above the current floodplain and well above projections for 2070 SLR.As noted above, the wings of the building and resident community courtyard space have been oriented with consideration of the predominant easterly winter wind direction and southerly solar sun exposure.All lobby level amenity space is proposed above elevation 14, and therefore does not require watertight construction.To the extent that the attendant utility and sanitary facilities are below elevation 10, they will be flood proofed as required by the Massachusetts State Building Code.Each wing of the building has been set back as far as possible from the abutting neighbors to the south and set back from the treeline abutting the eastern property boundary. The design responds differently to the Szetela Lane and the waterfront sides of the Project Site in both the massing and the mix of materials.Along Szetela Lane, the building is set back from the roadway and partially screened by the publicly accessible open space.However, the façade of the building is inset to create a soft break in this long facade.The scale and organization of the materials along these elevations are intended to create a façade that suggests flow and movement with respect to window layouts.On the southern side of the building facing the private residential space and abutting residences, similar materials and details are organized differently to respond to the more private side of the building.Wood-look accent cladding are employed to add texture to the elevations and provide contrast and variety.The exterior building materials are organized to break down the massing into smaller scale elements to create a scale that is understood from the pedestrian perspective, the outdoor private resident space, and publicly accessible open space. Façade materials are inspired by the Project Site’s proximity to the ocean, as well as Salem’s maritime past.A mix of fiber cement siding,wood-look cladding, and metals make up the material palette for the buildings.The color palette draws on the historic dark clapboard vernacular seen in much of historic Salem, balanced by lighter shades typical of seaside towns, with soft, muted, “washed” colors.The change in color occurs at regular intervals, creating a vertical rhythm more akin to the scale and proportions of a series of rowhouses.The building scale is reduced through the use of these materials in vertical sections along facade spans, which mix textures and colors. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-4 3.2 Sustainable Design The redeveloped Project Site will serve as a catalyst promoting a site-conscious and environmentally sensitive development prototype for a transitioning community. Due to the Project Site’s close proximity to the shoreline, it is imperative that the project design be deeply rooted and committed to sustainable building practices, as well as resiliency planning, and environmentally conscious design and construction.The multi-disciplinary design team has been proactively working together to propose an integrated, performative,and sensitive site infrastructure design for flood resilience, and energy efficiency, including Passive House certification.The project team has holistically designed and coordinated grading of the Project Site to locate residential units well above the current 100-year flood elevation and the estimated 2070 SLR projections. The design team has been closely collaborating with MEP engineers at Staengle Engineering and Sustainability Consultant,Linnean Solutions,to design the building for Passive House certification. A combination of a high performance building envelope, verified airtightness,and energy efficient equipment will be utilized.As detailed in the Passive House study (Appendix E), the project includes a number of building design and operational energy efficiency measures (EEMs)including:higher efficiency than Code windows,a very airtight building envelope,roof insulation, and cooling systems;a cool roof with light-colored membrane;interior lighting systems with a lower light power density than Code, which employ CFL and LED lights;sealing, insulating, and testing HVAC supply ducts;installing energy management systems;LED lighting for parking lots;Energy STAR electric appliances;WaterSense® bathroom fixtures;and on-site solar PV. 3.3 Site Access,Parking &Bicycle Storage Under existing conditions,the site is bifurcated by Lee Fort Terrace. As proposed,this throughway will be removed, and vehicles will access Leefort Terrace via Fort Avenue. This bituminous concrete access will accommodate internal circulation for delivery and service vehicles and access to both surface and garage parking.Secondary,emergency fire access to the front of the building has been incorporated into the design of the publicly accessible open space consisting of a 6-foot-wide concrete paved sidewalk flanked on each side by 5-foot-wide reinforced turf. Parking consists of 86 covered garage parking spaces,32 in the West Wing and 54 in the East Wing, and an additional 14 surface parking spaces south of the buildings.Six of Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-5 these parking spaces are ADA accessible including 1 van space. Four of the parking spaces are located in the West Wing,2 are located in the East Wing. The garage level also provides a 433±SF bicycle storage room,adjacent to one of two doors providing easy resident access to the waterfront open space and associated paths and sidewalks along Szetela Lane and the multi-modal path systems along Collins Cove. 3.4 Site Grading & Lighting The site has been carefully designed and graded to elevate the majority of the Project Site well above the current floodplain (El.10),with only portions of the public open space facing Collins Cove and the site entranceway off Fort Avenue and a few of the surface parking spaces located at or below elevation 10.As detailed on the ICON Building Plan Section (Appendix I),the garage parking is set at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and Community Level is set at elevation 14 (4 feet above the current floodplain), and, the lowest elevation of residential unit, is set at elevation 21,11 feet above the current floodplain, and well above projected SLR.Undulating topography has been created in the public open space to shield views of the garage parking from Szetela Lane,offer some future protection from flooding,and to imitate the undulating feel reminiscent of a coastal landscape. Both pedestrian and vehicular lighting installed throughout the site on timber poles will be LED full cutoff, dark-sky friendly and will have a BUG (Backlight, Uplight, Glare) rating of B2,U2,G2.See BSC Plan Sheet L-301 (Appendix I). 3.5 Publicly Accessible Open Space Under existing conditions,landscaping consists of scattered shade trees, a few foundation plantings and lawn;pathways consisting of roadway sidewalks and functional building access, and scattered benches.The Propoent proposes a robust planting design for both the publicly accessible open space and the private residential community spaces.The features and amenities within the publicly accessible open space and private residential spaces were designed in collaboration with the current Leefort Terrace residents and other members of the general public who expressed interest in design of the publicly accessible open space during community meetings and ZBA or Conservation Commission Public Hearings. The publicly accessible open space incorporates native and naturalized species of deciduous shade trees,small trees,shrubs, and ground cover listed by Coastal Zone Management and UMass Amherst as tolerant and adapted to growing in coastal environments.Additionally, specific pollinator seed mixes were selected for the open space meadows and elevated (dry) Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-6 or depressed (wet)landforms.The open space includes bio-retention cells to collect rainwater from surrounding areas and impervious surfaces,and to provide infiltration.The primary walkway will consist of concrete paving flanked on each side by reinforced turf to accommodate fire access with secondary stone dust paths.A wide array of seating types will accommodate a diverse group of users and activities.Seating includes game/café tables, armchair seating, wooden benches, picnic tables,and timber hammock posts. Additional public amenities include designated areas for public art/sculpture,pedestrian scale lighting, bike racks, trash and recycling receptacles,and dog waste bag dispensers. 3.6 Stormwater Management The Proponent proposes to provide stormwater management in accordance with MassDEP’s Stormwater Management standards.The Project qualifies as a “redevelopment,”and since the Project Site is located within LSCSF,certain stormwater standards are not applicable and will be met to the greatest extent practicable.As a result, the Proponent has demonstrated compliance with all of the applicable stormwater management standards as set forth in the MassDEP’s Stormwater Management Handbook (Handbook), effective February 2008,and the standards enumerated at 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k) in accordance with the redevelopment criteria and work within LSCSF.The stormwater management and drainage analysis are contained in the Drainage Report (Appendix B)prepared by Bohler dated July 1,2022.Below is a bullet summary of the redevelopment design and proposed stormwater improvements and BMPs. Decrease in impervious surface by 0.13±acres (5,800 SF)resulting in inherent reductions in peak runoff rates, groundwater recharge,and water quality; Deep sump hooded catch basins and one proprietary treatment unit prior to discharge to LID bio-retention cells; Five proposed bio-retention cells planted with shrubs and seed mixes designed to meet MassDEP water quality standard #4; and A new Long-Term Operation and Maintenance Plan. 3.7 Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Electric The Proponent proposes to install a new 8-inch sanitary sewer service for the building which will connect to the existing 15-inch sewer main in Fort Avenue.The Project will confirm adequacy of adjacent sewer mains as required by the City of Salem. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts PROPOSED PROJECT Page 3-7 The proposed building will reuse a section of the existing 8-inch diameter water line for the proposed fire protection service.A new domestic water service will be installed connecting to the existing 16-inch diameter water main in Fort Avenue.The proposed connections for the building are an 8-inch fire service pipe and a separate four 4-inch pipe for domestic water service.The Project will complete hydrant flow testing as required by the City of Salem to confirm adequacy of mains. The proposed project will connect to the existing utility pole at the southeast corner of the site along Fort Avenue, where a riser is proposed to bring electric and telecommunication services underground and distribute services across the project site. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ALTERNATIVES Page 4-1 4.0 ALTERNATIVES The Proponent has considered three alternatives to the Preferred Project:1)the No-Build Alternative; 2)a 224 Unit Alternative;and 3)the 124 Unit Alternative filed with the ZBA and Conservation Commission.The following table provides a numeric comparison of each alternative to the Preferred Plan. Alternative Project Site Acreage Units Building Footprint Roadway/ Pavement/ Parking Other Areas/ Landscaping Waterways Open Space No-Build 3.581± ac 50 0.63± ac 1.27± ac 1.68± ac 1.08± ac S 214 Unit Alternative 5.72± ac 214 1.32± ac 0.98± ac 3.42± ac 2.13± ac 124 Unit Alternative 3.58± ac 124 0.83± ac 1.00± ac 1.75± ac 1.26± ac Preferred Alternative 3.58± ac 124 0.76± ac 1.01± ac 1.81± ac 1.26± ac 1.The 3.58±Project Site acreage includes 0.16±acres of improvements within the ROW to Szetela Lane. 4.1 No-Build Alternative The existing Leefort Terrace development,constructed in 1958,is currently a Chapter 667 state public housing development providing housing for elderly and disabled residents.The units are subsidized by the DHCD through the state public housing operating and capital subsidy formula, which is insufficient to cover capital upgrades. All residential units are currently at or near the coastal floodplain elevation and at significant and increasing risk of storm related flooding and SLR.None of the units are ADA accessible,and given the approximate size of only 371 SF, the units cannot be adapted.Residents report continual problems with flooding, outdated kitchen and bath facilities, climate control, and pest issues resulting from the obsolete design and construction methods.Built to standards more than six decades outdated, renovation of Leefort Terrace is not a viable alternative. During community meetings conducted over the past 18+months, some have suggested that the existing units should simply be renovated. The current development has fallen into disrepair and was built to outdated standards at elevations at or near the floodplain Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ALTERNATIVES Page 4-2 that are no longer sustainable,all contributing to the need for new construction.The proposed new affordable housing project is an opportunity to meet local need not only by providing much needed replacement housing for the existing 50 Leefort Terrace elderly and disabled residents,who will be offered the first choice of units when returning to the completed redevelopment,but also generating an additional 74 new units of affordable rental housing in Salem.For these reasons,the No-Build alternative is not feasible. 4.2 224 Unit Alternative Early in the site assessment process,the Proponent explored an alternative that included the use of an additional 2.15±acres of land owned by the City of Salem located west of Leefort Terrace,increasing the potential project site acreage to 5.72± acres (Appendix C).This alternative proposed to construct 224 new 1-, 2-, and 3- bedroom apartments within a single building with a primary spine and 3 wings—an east wing, central wing, and west wing.This alternative conceptually included ground level garage parking with 4 and 5 levels of units and amenities above.This alternative included vehicular access from both Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue and provided 224 resident parking spaces (132 garage spaces,92 surface spaces),plus 15 public surface parking spaces. The City-owned parcels west of Leefort Terrace are significantly encumbered by a sewer easement varying in width from 24 to 15 feet containing a 60-inch sewer trunk line and a 10-foot wide Algnoguin Gas easement containing a 16-inch gas line. These additional parcels also have a complicated chain of title relative to City of Salem ownership.Due to the complications with the additional parcels,and early community feedback, the Proponent rejected this alternative and proceeded forward only with redevelopment of the SHA owned parcels. 4.3 124 Unit Plan Filed with the ZBA and Conservation Commission The Proponent filed a 124 unit plan with the ZBA in April 2022 and with the Conservation Commission in May 2022.This plan included 124,1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments within a U-shaped building with two wings connected by a bridge,a total of 100 garage and surface parking spaces,courtyard resident community space, and new public open space.In response to input from the community, ZBA, Conservation Commission, and City Staff, the building footprint was reduced,elevations were modified, the courtyard resident spaces were modified,and the Proponent created a Public Open Space Working Group to further design the publicly accessible open space. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ALTERNATIVES Page 4-3 As a result, the Proponent is proceeding forward with a modified 124 unit project as the Preferred Plan. 4.4 124 Unit Preferred Plan The Preferred Plan maintains the 124-unit count and courtyard design,while achieving the following: Condensing the building layout to be smaller and more efficient: Condensing the building size and reducing the overall footprint by 3,240±SF; Converting the bridge connecting the two wings into useable amenity and residential space at all levels; Shortening the East Wing by 44 feet and the West Wing by 16 feet,shifting both wings farther away from the residences along Fort Avenue;and Shifting the building westerly and farther away from the buffer tree line along the property boundary with Memorial Park. Removing an access road, reducing impervious surface: Consolidating the basement garage level from two entries to one, with the ability to drive through the full parking level to access all spaces at once; Removing the access road behind the three abutting homes and converting the area into landscaping and a larger victory garden;and Maintaining a recess in the building façade between the East and West Wings as the bridge had done previously. Changing building siding materials in line with coastal building typology: Modifying the design of the elevations and siding to reflect a more New England coastal feel; Introducing traditional clapboard style fiber cement boards as the primary exterior siding, with accents of a natural look wood-like material; Using a color palette that draws on the historic dark clapboard vernacular seen in much of historic Salem, balanced by lighter shades typical of seaside towns, with soft, muted, “washed” colors.The change in color occurs at regular intervals, creating a vertical rhythm more akin to the scale and proportions of a series of rowhouses. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ALTERNATIVES Page 4-4 Landscape Improvements: Enhanced courtyard landscape design by providing additional resident amenity space in the courtyard section including enlarging the area and count of raised beds in the resident gardening area, focusing the seating and courtyard area around the community room,and adding an area for grills. Fully designed Publicly Accessible Open Space in coordination with a group of community volunteers and Leefort residents who responded to our open invitations to participate. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-1 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS The following provides an Assessment of the Impacts associated with construction of the Proposed Project.Mitigation for these impacts is provided in Section 7.0. 5.1 Land Alteration Impacts to the land are a natural consequence of any site development. Impacts associated with the Proposed Project include redevelopment of the entire obsolete affordable housing development.Land impacts include:removal of 24 shade trees and scattered clusters of shrubs,building demolition, roadway removal,stripping and stockpiling of topsoil,soil excavation for building foundations and footings;grading and filling to achieve the desired grades for stormwater management and undulating landforms designed to mimic a coastal landscape;importation of the clean fill;building construction;paving for site access, surface parking and internal circulation; and construction of the publicly accessible open space north of the building and private residential amenities south of the building. 5.2 Floodplain and Tideland Impacts The Project Site will permanently impact 1.26± acres of LSCSF. The Project Site also contains 2.16±acres of landlocked filled tidelands, 1.26±acres of which occurs within 250 linear feet of the high water mark to Collins Cove that is subject to a Waterways License.While impacts to these areas are an unavoidable consequence,the Proponent has taken great care to design the project in a manner that minimizes impacts to the greatest extent practicable while at the same time balancing the goals and objectives of the SHA to provide much needed affordable housing while complying with the relevant local and state performance standards as articulated in Section 6.0. 5.3 Transportation Impacts While the Proposed Project does not exceed any transportation thresholds,Vanasse & Associates, Inc.(VAI)prepared a Transportation Impact Assessment in March 2022 for the ZBA Comprehensive Permit process (see Appendix D).This assessment included analysis of existing traffic volumes, recent crash data, and the anticipated traffic generated by the Proposed Project.The study examined existing and projected traffic operations (both with and without the proposed development)at key intersections in the vicinity of the Project Site.Based on the analysis presented in the study,the traffic Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-2 projected to be generated by the proposed development is not shown to have a significant impact on the area roadways and intersections. 5.4 Passive House (PHIUS)Design Operational carbon emissions savings for this project have been estimated using a WUFi Energy model.WUFi modeling is the primary tool for determining compliance with Passive House Institute US (PHIUS)certification requirements.The model is more specific than standard EnergyPlus or DOE2 energy modeling in that it explicitly accounts for envelope airtightness,door and window performance, hot water plumbing heat loss, on-site photovoltaic electricity generation, and several other relevant performance characteristics of a project. The model for this project compares a “base building” defined as the project as-designed which complies with IECC 2018 energy code (with Massachusetts amendments)-the Massachusetts Stretch Energy Code in force in the City of Salem,in comparison with a building design optimized for performance that meets the PHIUS certification criteria. See Appendix E for Baseline and Proposed WUFI Reports.The optimized building is the design the Proponent is proceeding forward with. Once the operational energy savings for the optimized building are determined, carbon factors for the current New England grid are applied to determine the operational carbon emissions savings for the project over a Stretch Energy Code compliant version of the building.Operational carbon emissions savings of 15.1% are achieved. Leefort Terrace Source Energy Emissions Conversion Baseline Proposed Reduction % Reduction Source Energy Total Baseline (kWh/yr)1,410,778.9 1,197,231.8 213,547.1 15.1% CO2e emissions associated with source energy total (lbs CO2)751,942.2 638,124.6 113,820.6 15.1% CO2e emissions associated with source energy total (short tons CO2)376.0 319.1 56.9 15.1% NPCC New England grid emissions factor (lb CO2/kWh)-Source: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022- 01/egrid2020_summary_tables.pdf 0.533 Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-3 5.5 Construction Related Impacts Similar to land impacts, construction impacts are the natural consequence of any proposed development. These impacts can be managed and reduced when measures are in place during construction to preclude and/or minimize impacts to both the built and natural environment.Construction related impacts include control of erosion and sedimentation both during and immediately after completion of construction;soil management;control of potential equipment spills, noise,and vibration generated by construction activities,ambient air quality due to dust generation;and construction related truck traffic and construction employee traffic. 5.6 Climate Change Adaptation & Resiliency As provided in the MEPA Interim Protocol on Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency (effective October 1, 2021), the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool output has been appended to this ENF filing (Appendix F)and the Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Section of the ENF form has been completed. The Project Proponent consulted the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool. The RMAT Tool did not indicate a “High” risk rating for sea level rise/storm surge at the Project Site (“Moderate” risk was indicated).The Tool indicated a Low risk for extreme precipitation (riverine flooding).For extreme precipitation (urban flooding), the site is mapped as having a “High” risk.The Tool indicated a High risk for extreme heat. 5.7 Storm Rise and Recede Flow Paths Bohler evaluated existing and proposed storm rise and recede flow paths associated with the Project Site. Under existing conditions, the 100-year flood encroaches into the Project Site up to elevation 10.The project site is positioned between the Salem Harbor and Collins Cove and as floodwaters advance,they approach the site from both directions.The proposed site grading will not alter the flow paths as illustrated on the attached Flood Surge and Flood Recession exhibits (Appendix G).Additionally, the proposed site grading does not channelize floodwaters so there are no anticipated changes to existing floodwater velocities. 5.8 Environmental Justice On January 1, 2022,two MEPA protocols for Environmental Justice became effective. The MEPA Public Involvement Protocol for Environmental Justice Populations and the MEPA Interim Protocol for Analysis of Project Impacts on Environmental Justice Populations.Compliance with protocols is described below: Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-4 5.8.1 Public Involvement Protocol for Environmental Justice Populations The public involvement protocol is divided into three sections as outlined below: Identifying Characteristics of and Likely Effects on EJ Populations A.Project Location Appendix H,Figure 1,depicts a map of all EJ populations within 5 miles of the Project Site.Appendix H,Figure 2 depicts a more detailed view of all EJ Populations within 1 mile of the Project Site. B.Characteristics of EJ Populations The Project is located within one mile of 10 different Environmental Justice (EJ) Populations (Appendix H,Figure 2). This assessment includes the following 10 identified EJ populations: Block Group 1, Census Tract 2042,(“BG1, CT 2042”):Minority and Income Block Group 1, Census Tract 2045, (“BG1, CT 2045”): Minority Block Group 1, Census Tract 2046, (“BG1, CT 2046”): Minority Block Group 2, Census Tract 2042, (“BG2, CT 2042”): Minority Block Group 2, Census Tract 2043,(“BG2, CT 2043”):Minority and Income Block Group 3, Census Tract 2043, (“BG3, CT 2043”): Minority, Income and English Isolation Block Group 4, Census Tract 2042, (“BG4, CT 2042”): Minority Block Group 4, Census Tract 2046, (“BG4, CT 2046”): Minority Block Group 4, Census Tract 2174, (“BG4, CT 2174”): Minority and Income Block Group 5, Census Tract 2042, (“BG5, CT 2042”): Income According to the EJ Maps Viewer, languages spoken by 5% or more of residents who identify as not speaking English “very well”within 5 miles of the Project Site include:Portuguese or Portuguese Creole, Spanish or Spanish Creole, French Creole or Haitian Creole. C.Likely Effects on EJ Populations See Section 5.8.2 below, which contains a detailed analysis of the Project’s potential impacts to EJ populations. Measures to Enhance Public Involvement Prior to Filing EENF A.Advance Notification Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-5 On June 28, 2022 advanced notification was provided to community-based organizations (CBOs) and tribes based on the recommended list provided by the EEA EJ Director.The Proponent also expanded this list to include anyone who had provided their email address as part of the Proponent’s Leefort Terrace Community Outreach Process as described below. On July 6, 2022, the Proponent also posted the Environmental Justice Screening Form to the Leefort Terrace Website.Paper copies of the notice also were delivered to each of the current residents of Leefort Terrace.Lastly, the Environmental Justice Screening Form and the message accompanying the Form on the Leefort Terrace Website were provided in English Portuguese, Spanish,and Haitian Creole (Appendix H). B.Community Outreach and Engagement Beginning in late 2020 and prior to creating a program and site plan for redevelopment of Leefort Terrace, the Proponent and project team took a very deliberate and comprehensive approach to engaging Leefort residents, direct abutters, neighbors,members of the Salem community,and City and state elected and non- elected officials.The project has received significant support and positive feedback from many community members as well as the Mayor, Planning Department, members of City Council,and the State Representative and Senator.This engagement includes the following that is described in greater detail at Leefort Terrace Events. Fall 2020 to Individual and small group meetings with residents, abutters, to Spring 2021 community members,and elected officials.Launched the Leefort Terrace Website. March 2021 Large Community Meeting and Listening Session. March 2021 Presentation to the City of Salem’s Sustainability, Energy, and Resiliency Committee. September 2021 Kitchen Table Conversations with well over 50 stakeholders and and Ongoing Story of Place discussions to develop design principles. December 2021 Community Meeting –Story of Place learning and research,and Schematic Site Plan Presentation. February 2022 Community Meeting and Listening Session –Elevations and Renderings. March 2022 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Meeting and Presentation. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-6 May 2022 Salem Willows Neighborhood Association Meeting. May 2022 Initial ZBA &Planning Board Joint Public Hearing and Conservation Commission Initial Public Hearings. June 2022 2nd ZBA Public Hearing. June -July 2022 Held three Public Open Space Working Group Meetings. July 2022 ZBA and Conservation Commission Public Hearings presenting the Preferred Plan. The Proponent and various team members also have met with the Leefort Terrace Tenant Association at least 4 or 5 times and are scheduled to meet with them again in late August 2022. The Proponent,SHA,and the development team remain committed to continuing to promote meaningful public involvement and to continue regular community conversation.The Proponent already has incorporated feedback from residents, abutters,and community members including stepping down the building from 4 to 3 stories when approaching the abutters to the south, creating a quieter wing at the request of current Leefort elderly and disabled residents who plan to return, strong sustainability and resiliency techniques,and maintaining ample open space.The Proponent remains open to further adjustments in response to feedback, within the constraints of development feasibility and affordable housing production goals. C.Pre-filing Consultation As noted above,the Proponent and project team members participated in a Pre-filing Consultation meeting with MEPA Director,Tory Kim,Assistant MEPA Director, Page Czepiga, and Deputy Director of Environmental Justice,Vallery Cardoso on May 19, 2022. Public Involvement Requirements After Filing EENF The Proponent remains committed to continue meaningful public involvement and feedback by interested members of the public,including EJ Populations.The Proponent, SHA,and the development team will continue regular community conversations, and the Proponent remains open to further adjustments in response to feedback, within the constraints of development feasibility and affordable housing production goals. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-7 The Proponent is open to additional means of public outreach and community engagement throughout the MEPA process.As noted in the above outline,the Proponent considers community engagement an on-going process. 5.8.2 Analysis of Project Impacts on Environmental Justice Populations In accordance with the MEPA Interim Protocol for Analysis of Project Impacts on Environmental Justice Populations,effective date of January 1, 2022, the Project Proponent performed an assessment of any existing unfair or inequitable environmental burden and related public health consequences impacting the nearby environmental justice populations from any prior or current private, industrial, commercial, state,or municipal operation or project that has damaged the environment.The following is a description of the results of the assessment.The Proposed Project does not impact air quality (i.e.,does not generate 150 or more New adt of diesel vehicle traffic,excluding public transit trips, over a duration of 1 year or more). Therefore,additional EJ populations within 5 miles of the Proposed Project were not included in the analysis. An assessment was conducted of past and current polluting activities within the 10 EJ Populations within one mile of the project that may have contributed to an overall “environmental burden” currently borne by any of the EJ Populations. The assessment was conducted using publicly available mapping tools, as described below: First, the Project Proponent used the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) EJ Tool to identify whether the City of Salem exhibits one or more of four specific “vulnerable health criteria:”(Heart Attack, Childhood Blood Lead, Low Birth Weight, and Childhood Asthma). Two of the vulnerable health criteria were met for the City of Salem: Childhood Blood Lead and Childhood Asthma (Appendix H).Note that Childhood Asthma is tracked only at the municipal level, so individual EJ populations within one mile of the Project with relatively higher levels could not be distinguished from the City of Salem as a whole. With Childhood Blood Lead, the DPH EJ Viewer tracks the criterion at the census tract level.The resultant output indicated that the census tract within which the Project site occurs had a Blood Lead Level Prevalence of 34.5 per 1,000 which is more than twice the Statewide rate of 14.985 per 1,000.Although elevated levels of the two identified vulnerable health criteria indicate that the nearby EJ populations may potentially bear an “unfair or inequitable” environmental burden or related public health consequences, the likely cause(s) of these health issues are not related to the existing or proposed conditions at the Project Site, and the Project will not cause an increase in either of these conditions on the nearby EJ communities. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-8 Second, the Project Proponent consulted additional data layers in the DPH EJ Tool to survey other potential sources of pollution within the boundaries of the 10 EJ populations.The following facilities and infrastructure features were identified by the Tool among the 10 EJ Populations: MassDEP major air and waste facilities:Large Quantity Generator Facility Name Address EJ Location Valvoline Instant Oil Change 87 North Street BG4, CT 2046 MassDEP major air and waste facilities:Large Quantity Toxic User Facility Name Address EJ Location Excelitas Technologies lluminations Inc. 35 Congress Street BG3, CT 2043 MassDEP major air and waste facilities:Air Operating Permits Facility Name Address EJ Location Footprint Power Salem Harbor Development 24 Fort Avenue Not in EJ Population but only 1,200 feet east of BG4, CT 2044 and 1,500 feet east of Project site MassDEP Tier Classified 21E Sites RTN#Tier#Address EJ Location 3-0035818 1 45-49 Congress Street BG3, CT 2043 3-0035086 2 30 Leavitt Street BG1, CT 2042 “Tier II” toxics use reporting facilities Facility Name Address EJ Location EHS Above TPQ? AT&T -MA3445 45 Congress Street BG3, CT 2043 YES Excelitas Technologies Corp 35 Congress Street BG3, CT 2043 YES National Grid –Salem LNG Facility 20 Pierce Avenue BG1, CT 2045 NO Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-9 MassDEP Sites with AULs Facility Name Address EJ Location RTN # Former Ventron Facility 10-16 Congress Street BG4, CT 2174 3-0033401 NEPCO Property Fmr Gas PL Pierce Avenue and Waite Street BG1, CT 2045 3-0001709 No Location Aid 10 Skerry Street BG1, CT 2045 3-0022125 Dodge Area LLC 219 Washington Street BG2, CT 2042 3-0028079 Commercial Property 19 Congress Street BG3,CT 2043 3-0022824 64 ½ Harbor Street Residence 64 ½ Harbor Street BG3, CT 2043 3-0030458 Shetland Properties Inc.45 Congress Street BG3, CT 2043 3-0025120 Underground Storage Tanks Facility Name Address EJ Location Sams Market 94 Bridge Street BG1,CT 2045 Salem Shell 111 North Street BG4, CT 2046 Sunoco Inc 105 North Street BG4, CT 2046 AL Prime Energy Salem 175 Lafayette Street BG1, CT 2042 EPA Facilities: Toxic Release Inventory Sites 2017 Facility Name Address EJ Location Excelitas Technologies Corp 35 Congress Street BG3, CT 2043 Road Infrastructure: MassDOT Roads Route Name EJ Location SR 114 BG1, CT 2045; BG1, CT 2046; BG2, CT 2042; BG4, CT 2046; BG5, CT 2042 SR 1A BG1, CT 2042; BG1, CT 2045; BG2,CT 2042; BG2, CT 2043; BG3, CT 2043; BG4, CT 204; BG4, CT 2174 SR 107 BG1, CT 2045; BG4, CT 2046; BG4, CT 2174 MBTA Bus and Rapid Transit: MBTA Bus Routes MBTA Route with Stop in EJ Community EJ Location 450 BG5, CT 2042 Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-10 451 BG1, CT 2045; BG2, CT 2042;BG1, CT 2103; BG4, CT 2044; BG1, CT 2174 455 BG1, CT 2042; BG2, CT 2042; BG2, CT 2043; BG3, CT 2043 456 BG5, CT 2042 459 BG1, CT 2042; BG2, CT 2042; BG2, CT 2043; BG3, CT 2043 465 BG4, CT 2046; BG5, CT 2042 MBTA Bus and Rapid Transit: MBTA Bus Stops Stop ID Address EJ Location 4674 North St. @ Mason St.BG4,CT 2046 6100 Leavitt St. @ Congress St.BG2, CT 2043 6102 Congress St. @ Shetland Park Industrial Park BG3, CT 2043 6103 New Derby St. opp Klop Alley BG2, CT 2042 6104 Lafayette St. @ Harbor St.BG2, CT 2042; BG3, CT 2043 6106 Lafayette St. @ Cedar St.BG1, CT 2042; BG2, CT 2042 6178 Lafayette St. @ Palmer St.BG1, CT 2042; BG2, CT 2042 6180 Lafayette St. @ Harbor St.BG2, CT 2042; BG3, CT 2043 6181 New Derby St. @ Klop Alley BG2, CT 2042 7136 Cabot St. @ Rantoul St.BG4, CT 2174 7138 Bridge St. @ Thorndike St.BG1, CT 2045 7139 Bridge St. @ Skerry St.BG1, CT 2045 7140 Bridge St. @ Ames St.BG1, CT 2045 7141 Bridge St. @ March St.BG1, CT 2045 7142 Bridge St. @ Saunders St.BG1,CT 2045 7154 Congress St. @ Derby St.BG3, CT 2043 7155 Congress St. @ Derby St.BG3, CT 2043 7162 Bridge St. @ Cromwell St.BG1, CT 2045 7163 Bridge St. @ Osgood St.BG1, CT 2045 7164 11 Bridge St.BG1, CT 2045 16102 Congress St. opp Shetland Pk.BG3,CT 2043 16177 Lafayette @ Leavitt St.BG1, CT 2042 17142 Winter St. @ Bridge St.BG4, CT 2044 17143 Winter St. @ Washington St.BG4, CT 2044 17155 Winter St. @ Washington St.BG4, CT 2044 17156 Winter St. @ Bridge St.BG4, CT 2044 Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-11 Other Transportation Infrastructure: Railroad Station Station Ownership EJ Location MBTA Commuter Rail Salem Station, 252 Bridge St. Newburyport Line BG1, CT 2045 The results of nearby facilities show that there are numerous known operations under the purview of regulatory agencies for air and/or ground pollution.The Proposed Project will not impose any further pollution or environmental burden on the nearby EJ populations.Though located outside of any EJ Populations, Footprint Power Salem Harbor Station is a dominant energy-generating feature in the vicinity of the Proposed Project and for the community as a whole.Starting in 2018, the power plant was converted from coal and oil-fired generation to natural gas. According to a website maintained by Footprint Power (the former owner of the Station),conversion of the plant will result in significant improvements in air quality both at the local and regional levels. By converting to a highly efficient gas-fired plant, the plant will displace the usage of less-efficient gas-fired plants elsewhere in New England. The new technology will lead to a 10% reduction in sulfur oxides (Sox),8 % reduction in nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 6% reduction in mercury (Hg) in New England. Finally,burning natural gas instead of coal or oil will reduce carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)emissions by approximately 450,000 tons per year over the next decade. The results of nearby infrastructure analysis shows that residents of the nearby EJ populations have access to a variety of State highway routes, MBTA bus routes,and the MBTA commuter rail stations (Salem station within 1.8 miles and Beverly Station within 2 miles). The Project will not diminish access to such infrastructure for the nearby EJ populations. Third, the Project Proponent consulted the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool (the “RMAT Tool;”Appendix F).The RMAT Tool did not indicate a “High” risk rating for sea level rise/storm surge at the Project Site (“Moderate” risk was indicated). The Tool indicated a Low risk for extreme precipitation (riverine flooding).For extreme precipitation (urban flooding), the site is mapped as having a “High” risk.The High risk of urban flooding may indicate an elevated climate risk for the local EJ population. Fourth, the Project Proponent, at their option, consulted the U.S. EPA’s “EJ Screen,” which provides a percentile ranking by census block group, compared against statewide averages, for 11 environmental indicators. An analysis was performed for the area within Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Page 5-12 1 mile of the Project Site (Appendix H). The environmental indicators assessed through the EPA EJ Screen were as follows: NATA Air Toxics Cancer Risk (lifetime exposure), NATA Respiratory Hazard Index Ratio, NATA Diesel PM (DPM), Particulate Matter (PM2.5) (annual average), Ozone (summer seasonal average, daily 8-hr max),Lead Paint (% of housing built before 1960), Traffic Proximity and Volume Count of vehicles (average annual), Proximity to RMP (Risk Management Plan/hazardous waste cleanup) Sites,Proximity to TSDFs (Hazardous waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities), Proximity to NPLs (National Priority List/Superfund sites) and Wastewater Discharge Toxicity (based on NPDES permitted discharge locations). The analysis found that none of the indicators were above the 85th percentile for the State levels of the assessed indicators. Finally,in response to the MEPA 45-day advance notification,the Project Proponent has not received any specific concerns, responses or feedback from any community-based organizations (CBOs), tribes, or other individuals pursuant to the MEPA EJ Public Involvement Protocol. Furthermore, the Project Proponent is not aware of any land alteration, impervious area, wetland impacts, or vehicle trips associated with the Proposed Project that create an unfair or inequitable environmental burden or related consequence as compared to the general population. Potential short-term environmental and public health impacts during construction that may be incurred by the nearby EJ Communities, but will not create an unfair or inequitable environmental burden or related consequence as compared to the general population,include dust, construction and delivery vehicle emissions, truck routes,and potential traffic congestion. In conclusion, based on the information gathered during this assessment,the identified EJ Populations do not currently bear an existing “unfair or inequitable” environmental burden and related public health consequences as compared to the general population. Any minor short-term environmental or public health impacts during Project construction are greatly outweighed by the mitigation and site improvements to be implemented as a result of the Project’s construction. The environmental and public health impacts are unlikely to result in a disproportionate adverse effect on the EJ populations within one mile of the Project. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Page 6-1 6.0 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS The Proposed Project will require a 40B Comprehensive Permit from the ZBA,an Order of Conditions from the Conservation Commission, and a Waterways License from the DEP Waterways.The Proponent filed with the ZBA in April 2022 and with the Conservation Commission in May 2022.These filing are currently under review. The Proponent also participated in a Pre-Application meeting with Frank Taormina of DEP Waterways on July 27,2022 to review and discuss existing site conditions and the extent of Landlocked Tidelands, Water-dependent Use,and regulatory compliance. Below is a description of the Project’s compliance with the applicable Performance Standards. 6.1 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations 6.1.1 310 CMR 10.04 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage This resource area is defined at 310 CMR 10.04, but there are no General Performance Standards for the alteration of LSCSF.However, the residential buildings are designed in full compliance with the State Building Code and exceed State Building Code for work within the floodplain. The project site is positioned between the Salem Harbor and Collins Cove and as such, floodwaters approach the site from both directions.Under existing conditions, the 100- year storm event (elevation 10)inundates nearly the entire Project Site. Under proposed conditions,the site has been designed and graded to elevate the majority of the Project Site well above elevation 10,with only portions of the public open space facing Collins Cove and the site entranceway off Fort Avenue,and a few of the surface parking spaces located at or below elevation 10.As noted in Sections 3.1 and 7.6 and detailed on the ICON Building Sections,(Appendix I),the garage parking is set at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and community space at elevation 14, and the lowest floor of any residential unit at or above elevation 21. The proposed site grading will not alter the flow paths as illustrated on the attached Flood Surge and Flood Recession exhibits (Appendix G).Additionally, the proposed site grading does not channelize floodwaters so there are no anticipated changes to existing floodwater velocities. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Page 6-2 6.1.2 DEP Stormwater Management Policy The proposed stormwater management system has been designed, to the greatest extent feasible, in compliance with the ten standards set forth in the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) Stormwater Management Handbook (Handbook), effective February 2008, and the standards enumerated at 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k).A summary of the proposed stormwater management is contained in Section 3.6, and stormwater calculations and a detailed drainage analysis and summary of the Proposed Project’s compliance with the applicable stormwater standards are contained in Appendix B. 6.2 Salem Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance &Salem Wetlands Protection Regulations 6.2.1 Section 50-9 Climate Change Resiliency Section 50-9 of the Ordinance states that the Applicant shall, to the maximum extent practicable,integrate considerations of adaptation planning into their project to promote climate change resilience so as to protect and promote resource area values in the future. The Applicant shall consider the resource area’s ability to be resilient to the effects of climate change and protect the values of the Ordinance.These considerations are especially important in Land Subject to Flooding and Coastal Storm Flowage (100-year floodplain),coastal wetlands, and other resources areas which protect the interest of Flood Control and Storm Damage Prevention… 6.2.2 Section 7A Climate Change Resiliency Regulations Section 7A. of the updated Ordinance Regulations states that to satisfy the resource area values defined in the Ordinance related to climate change, project Applicants submitting a Notice of Intent must provide the following documentation for the Conservation Commission’s review: The following provides each of the performance standards followed by an explanation of how the project has been designed to meet that standard. 1.Describe project design considerations which address storm and flood damage, including the potential for potential future flood damage. Under existing conditions, the 100-year storm event (elevation 10)inundates nearly the entire Project Site.Under proposed conditions,the site has been designed and graded to elevate the majority of the Project Site well above elevation 10,with only portions of the public open space facing Collins Cove and the site entranceway off Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Page 6-3 Fort Avenue,and a few of the surface parking spaces located at or below elevation 10.As noted in Sections 3.1 and 7.6 and detailed on the ICON Building Sections, (Appendix I),the garage parking is set at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and community space at elevation 14, and the lowest floor of any residential unit at or above elevation 21. 2.Describe how the project accounts, to the maximum extent practicable,for potential future increases in stormwater runoff (increased frequency and intensity of storm events), and how best management practices account for storm surges and extreme weather events anticipated due to climate change. The site design was based on the understanding that climate change and SLR will impact the area.The Project Site has been designed to consolidate the building footprint and located the proposed building farther away from Collins Cove than under existing conditions.The design also elevates the vehicular and hardscape areas around the building above the current flood elevation 10,and all habitable space occurs at or above elevation 21,well above current predictions for the 2070 flood level, which is 3.5 to 4.5 feet in this area based on the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Viewer and other sources.The grades on the north side of the building have been built up to offer some future protection from flooding.The site design includes a decrease in impervious area by 0.13±acres (5,800 SF)and five LID bio-retention cells that should decrease run-off and allow for greater infiltration than under current conditions. 3.Describe planting plans and other measures such as limiting increases in impervious surface cover to maintain and enhance the resiliency of the resource area(s)to withstand potential temperature and rainfall changes due to climate change, as well as Sea Level Rise. The public open space fronting on Collins Cove occupies a total of 1.26±acres of land (0.07±acres in the Szetela Lane ROW and 1.19±acres on-site)designed using native and naturalized deciduous shade trees,small trees,shrubs, and ground cover listed by Coastal Zone Management and UMass Amherst as tolerant and adapted to growing in coastal environments.Additionally,specific pollinator seed mixes were selected for the open space meadows and elevated landforms (dry) or depressed (wet) landforms.The remainder of the site, sheltered by the buildings from the coastal Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Page 6-4 setting, have been designed using a broader variety of native and naturalized plants. Traditional lawn areas are limited to the edges flanking pedestrian walkways to create a fire lane (reinforced turf for emergency access)within the publicly accessible open space,and a multi-use lawn for residents in the sheltered courtyard.Lastly, the open space and surface parking island incorporates five proposed bio-retention cells planted with shrubs and seed mixes conducive to stormwater retention and inundation. Under existing conditions, the existing buildings,surface parking,sidewalks,and Lee Fort Terrace occupy 1.9±acres of impervious surface on the site. Under proposed conditions,the new buildings,sidewalks and pathways,surface parking, and entranceway will occupy 1.77±acres of impervious surface,resulting in a decrease in impervious surface by 0.13±acres (5,800±SF). 4.Describe measures to protect proposed and existing structures and minimize damage to structures due to the impacts of climate change. As noted in Sections 3.1 and 7.6 and in response to Standard 1 above,the site has been carefully designed and graded to elevate the majority of the Project Site well above the current floodplain (El.10),with only portions of the publicly accessible open space facing Collins Cove and the site entranceway off Fort Avenue and a few of the surface parking spaces located at or below elevation 10.As detailed on the ICON Building Sections (Appendix I),the garage parking is set at elevation 10.5, the lobby and community space is at elevation 14, and the lowest floor of any residential unit at or above elevation 21. 5.Any vegetated wetland impacts proposed within areas also situated within Land Subject to Flooding or Coastal Storm Flowage shall be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio… No vegetated wetland impacts are proposed. In addition to the above considerations,it is important to recognize that the project has been designed with all-electric building, designed to Passive House (PHIUS+) certification with the goal to incorporate on site renewable energy generation, and designed with as many carbon sequestration,and regenerative materials as feasible, with the aim to minimize embodied carbon.Demolished building materials will be reused where feasible and new building materials will be specified that reduce life cycle greenhouse gas emissions.To the extent financially viable,the development aims to Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Page 6-5 include backup battery in order to become a hub by providing reliable backup power to the community in the case of a power outage. 6.3 Chapter 91 Waterways License 1.26±acres of the Project Site occur within private filled tidelands.All work is located beyond the 60.8±linear foot WDUZ and the 100-foot FPA, as measured landward from MHW.As a result, the project must comply with portions of 310 CMR 9.31, 9:51,9.52, and 9.54 as detailed below. Several definitions guide the regulatory review process under the Waterways Regulations at 310 CMR 9.00. Key definitions and compliance with those definition or regulatory criteria are listed below: Filled Tidelands means former submerged lands and tidal flats which are no longer subject to tidal action due to the presence of fill. Landlocked Tidelands means any filled tidelands which on January 1, 1984 were entirely separated by a public way or interconnected public ways from any flowed tidelands,except for that portion of such filled tidelands which are presently located: (a)within 250 feet of the high water mark,or (b)within any Designated Port Area. Said public way or ways shall also be defined as landlocked tidelands,except for any portion thereof which is presently within 250 feet of the high water mark. The entire Project Site, except for a very small portion of the Leefort Terrace, a private way,as it intersects Fort Avenue,is located within Filled Tidelands.However,because the Filled Tidelands on the Project Site are separated from the high water mark to Collins Cove by Szetela Lane (a public way),the majority of the Filled Tidelands on the site meet the definition of Landlocked Tidelands and do not require waterways permitting. Only the portion of the Filled Tidelands within 250 feet of the high water mark require a waterways license. Projects permitted by DEP Waterways are categorized as either water-dependent or non- water dependent uses. Water-dependent Use Project means a use as specified in these regulations at 310 CMR 9.12(2). 310 CMR 9.12 (2)states that the Department shall determine a use to be water- Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts STATUTORY AND REGULATORY STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Page 6-6 dependent upon a finding that said use requires direct access to or location in tidal or inland waters, and therefore cannot be located away from said waters.In making this determination, the Department shall act in accordance with the following provisions. (a)The Department shall find to be water-dependent the following uses: 4.Parks,esplanades,boardwalks, and other pedestrian facilities that promote use and enjoyment of the water by the general public and are located at or near the water’s edge, including but not limited to any park adjacent to a waterway created by a public agency; The Proponent proposes to demolish the existing brick buildings and remove the existing Lee Fort Terrace private roadway within 250 feet of the high water mark and create 1.26± acres of publicly accessible open space as described in Section 3.5. 310 CMR 9.52 (2)states in the event the project site does not include a water-dependent use zone,the project shall provide connecting public walkways or other public pedestrian facilities as necessary to ensure that sites containing water-dependent use zones will not be isolated from,or poorly linked with,public ways or other public access facilities to which any tidelands on the project site are adjacent. The 1.26±acres of publicly accessible open space has been designed with a focal entry plaza and seating aligned with an existing crosswalk providing access across Szetela Lane to a multi-modal path along the shoreline of Collins Cove.This relatively new path provides connections to Collins Cove Beach and Collins Cove Park northwest of the Project Site. 6.4 NPDES Permit An individual NPDES Permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is required. This permit will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prior to commencement of construction activities associated with the Proposed Project.A draft Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Erosion Control Plan Narrative, and Erosion Control Plan are provided in the Stormwater Report (Appendix B). Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-1 7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES The provisions of M.G.L.c. 30, §61, relate to the findings of each Agency for which Agency Action is required in acquiring the requisite state approval for the project. This project requires action from DEP for issuance of a Chapter 91 License.Accordingly, the onus is on the Proponent to demonstrate that all available measures will be incorporated into site design and development to avoid damage to the environment in accordance with the basic provisions of Section 61 findings.Development of the Proposed Project will unavoidably result in impacts to the environment. As a result,the Proponent is required to implement mitigating measures to aptly compensate for these impacts. The Proponent has committed to a number of mitigation measures as described in this Supplemental Report and briefly described below. 7.1 Publicly Accessible Open Space and Resident Amenities The publicly accessible open space facing Collins Cove incorporates native and naturalized species of deciduous shade trees,small trees,shrubs, and ground cover listed by Coastal Zone Management and UMass Amherst as tolerant and adapted to growing in coastal environments.Additionally,specific pollinator seed mixes were selected for the open space meadows and elevated (dry)or depressed (wet)landforms.The open space includes bio-retention cells,to collect rainwater from surrounding areas and impervious surfaces and to provide infiltration.The sidewalk will consist of concrete paving flanked on each side by reinforced turf to accommodate fire access and secondary stone dust paths.A wide array of seating types will accommodate a diverse group of users and activities.Seating includes game/café tables,armchair seating, wooden benches, picnic tables,and timber hammock posts. Additional public amenities include designated areas for public art/sculpture,pedestrian scale lighting,bike racks, trash and recycling receptacles,and dog waste bag dispensers.Additional private residential amenities south of the proposed building include courtyard resident community terraces and seating,a multi-use lawn,bocce courts,robust landscaping with native or naturalized species,and a victory garden.Overall, the Proponent is proposing to plant 133 new shade trees across the Project Site. 7.2 Stormwater Management The Stormwater Management System for the Proposed Project has been designed to include structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to comply with the DEP’s Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-2 Stormwater Management Guidance and Performance Standards at 310 CMR 10.05 (6) (k) as described in Section 6.5.3 and support in the Stormwater Report (see Appendix H). The proposed project does not include any new drainage outfalls for untreated stormwater. 7.3 Erosion and Sedimentation Prevention The Proponent will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and the conditions of all permits obtained for the Project. A draft Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been developed in accordance with the NPDES Phase II General Permit and a Notice of Intent for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities will be submitted to the EPA prior to the start of construction. During construction, the contractor will be required to comply with the NPDES General Permit and the SWPPP for the Proposed Project. 7.4 Transportation Based on the Transportation Impact Assessment prepared by VAI,a the following recommendations were developed that will be completed in conjunction with the Proposed Project.These recommendations include: Site Access Access and egress to the Project Site is proposed by one full-access driveway off of Fort Avenue.The following recommendations are offered with respect to Project access, internal circulation, and parking, many of which are already reflected on the Site Plans for the Proposed Project: The Project Site driveways and internal circulating drives should be a minimum of 22 feet in width where two-way traffic is to be conveyed and designed to accommodate the turning and maneuvering requirements of the largest anticipated responding emergency vehicle as defined by the Salem Fire Department. Vehicles exiting the Proposed Project and site internal intersections should be placed under STOP-sign control with a marked STOP-line provided. At the Fort Avenue site driveway, the existing school fence should be set back sufficiently from the edge of the roadways (approximately 6 feet)so as not to inhibit the available sightlines.It is also recommended that a “NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER” sign be installed to prohibit vehicles parking between site driveway and school crosswalk.Vehicles parked within this location would block sight lines from vehicles exiting from the proposed site driveway Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-3 All signs and pavement markings to be installed within the Project Site should conform to the applicable standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant wheelchair ramps should be provided at all pedestrian crossings internal to the Project Site and for crossing the Project site driveways. Signs and landscaping to be installed as a part of the Proposed Project within intersection sight triangle areas of the site driveways should be designed and maintained so as not to restrict lines of sight. Snow windrows within the sight triangle areas of the Project Site driveway should be promptly removed where such accumulations would impede sight lines. A school bus waiting area should be provided at an appropriate location defined in consultation with the Salem Public Schools. Traffic Demand Management As is the case with residential developments, a major focus of the traffic mitigation plan should be on the reduction of single-occupant vehicles (SOVs) arriving and departing to and from the Project Site.This is predominantly accomplished by developing a comprehensive TDM strategy.In consultation with the City,the proponent is committed to supporting a balanced multimodal transportation plan to serve the residents and visitors of the Project Site.In an effort to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation to SOVs, the following TDM measures will be implemented as a part of the Proposed Project: A transportation coordinator will be designated for the Proposed Project to coordinate the elements of the TDM program. Information regarding public transportation services,maps, schedules, and fare information will be posted in a central location and/or otherwise made available to residents. A “welcome packet”will be provided to residents detailing available public transportation services, bicycle and walking alternatives, and available commuter options. Pedestrian accommodations will be incorporated into the Project and consist of sidewalks and ADA-compliant wheelchair ramps at all pedestrian crossings internal Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-4 to the Project site that will link building entrances to the sidewalk infrastructure along Fort Avenue and Szetela Lane. Secure bicycle parking will be provided within the Project Site consisting of both exterior and interior (covered) bicycle parking. Work-at-home workspaces will be provided to support telecommuting by residents of the Project. Consideration should be given to installing accommodations for the charging of electric vehicles by residents of the Proposed Project. On site parking demand should be periodically reviewed by the transportation coordinator. With implementation of the above recommendations, safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access will be provided to the Project Site and the Project can be accommodated within the confines of the existing transportation system. 7.5 Passive House Mitigation Commitments As detailed in the WUFI study (Appendix E),the Project design includes the following building design and operational energy efficiency measures (EEMs): Using higher efficiency than Code windows and roof insulation; Specifying higher efficiency than Code cooling systems; Cool roof with light-colored shingles; Using interior lighting systems with a lower light power density than Code, which employ CFL and LED lights; Sealing, insulating,and testing HVAC supply ducts; Installing energy management systems; Using LED lighting for parking lots; Installing Energy STAR electric appliances; Using WaterSense® bathroom fixtures;and Providing solar-ready roof space for a possible third-party photo-voltaic (PV) installation on the roofs of the two apartment buildings. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-5 7.6 Climate Change Adaptation & Resiliency As provided in the MEPA Interim Protocol on Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency (effective October 1, 2021), the RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool output has been appended to this ENF filing (Appendix F)and the Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Section of the ENF form has been completed. The Project Proponent has incorporated measures, as feasible,to adapt to climate change for sea-based flooding and SLR,extreme precipitation and extreme heat.Such measures include: Designing the parking garage at elevation 10.5, the Lobby and Community space at elevation 14, and the lowest residential unit at elevation 21; Elevating the grades on the north side of the building to offer some future protection from flooding; Creating swales and other landscape features on the Cove side of the project to contain, divert, and infiltrate potential flood waters; Bioretention areas providing infiltration as well as serving as pretreatment of stormwater runoff, Planting 133 trees across tree caliper sizes to expand shading of both publicly accessible open space and the resident courtyard; Reducing impervious surface on the site to reduce heat island effect and improve rain water infiltration; Designing the building envelope to meet Passive House (PHIUS) standards to reduce heating and cooling loads during extreme weather events; and Designing efficient mechanical systems to reduce overall energy loads. These and other strategies will help improve resilience and livability for existing and new residents and improve residents’ abilities to withstand flooding, severe weather, and other unpredictable hazards. Lastly, the Project Proponent also has incorporated the following environmentally sensitive and sustainable design,planning,and building techniques and energy efficiency measures as feasible,to adapt to climate change risk for SLR,urban flooding,and extreme heat. Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-6 Sustainable Planning Consolidated, compact development; Resilient design for residential space elevated above current and future projected floodplain elevations; Reduced impervious surface; Site grading to raise the majority of the property out of the current floodplain elevation; Landscaped private residential property with courtyard patios,seating, multi-use lawn,bocce courts,and victory garden; Creation of 1.26±of publicly accessible,well landscaped,open space Connection of the site and publicly accessible open space to the multimodal path and Collins Cove; and Proving much needed additional affordable housing in the City of Salem. Sustainable Building Architecture & Accessibility Passive House building design (energy efficient heating and cooling,insulation, windows, roof and floor slab, ventilation); All electric building (heat, a/c, hot water) with solar PV electrical generation on- site; Low VOC building materials and as many carbon sequestering and regenerative building materials, as feasible; Community room, fitness center,and wellness center for residential use and full- time resident service coordinator; Garage and surface parking with garage bike storage enclosure and EV charging stations; Utilize high-efficiency (non-incandescent) interior lighting and LED lighting for vehicles and pedestrians;and Recycling program. 7.7 Environmental Justice 7.7.1 Vulnerable Health Criteria Although elevated levels of the two identified vulnerable health criteria indicate that the nearby EJ populations may potentially bear an “unfair or inequitable” environmental burden or related public health consequences, the likely cause(s) of these health issues are Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-7 not related to the existing or proposed conditions at the Project Site, and the Project will not cause an increase in either of these conditions on the nearby EJ communities. Instead, the project will remove an obsolete, aging housing community and construct new energy-efficient housing that will improve air quality for the residents and the immediate vicinity. 7.7.2 Potential Sources of Pollution See above Section 7.4 for transportation mitigation and Section 7.5 for Passive House Mitigation Commitments that will reduce potential sources of pollution relative to redevelopment of Leefort Terrace. The Proponent also proposes to construct 1.26±acres of publicly accessible open space. The existing crosswalk across Szetella Lane will maintain a direct connection between the proposed publicly accessible open space and the multi-modal path and the shoreline of Collins Cove.This relatively new path provides connections to the David J. Beattie Park south of the Project Site, to Collins Cove Beach and Collins Cove Park northwest of the Project Site, and extends along Webb Street connecting to a trail system along the Sergeant James Ayube Memorial Drive (Route 107) that provides off-road access to the Salem commuter rail station. 7.7.3 RMAT Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool The project has been designed to reduce potential flooding risk by reducing impervious surfaces and increase infiltration,with a building designed to reduce the potential for coastal flooding at the Project Site by raising the grades on the Project Site and elevating the housing units well above projected SLR.The building also is designed for Passive House certification in order to reduce local carbon and other emissions for nearby residents, including local EJ populations.Therefore, the Proposed Project would not impose upon the local EJ Population an “unfair or inequitable” environmental burden and related public health consequences as compared to the general population for “Sea Level Rise & Coastal Flooding” or “Extreme Precipitation” categories. 7.7.4 Construction During construction, contractors will be required to adhere to Massachusetts General Law Ch.90, Section 16A and 3.10 CMR 7.11, which prohibits the idling of engines of stopped vehicles in excess of five minutes except for concrete trucks which are excluded from this requirement while mixing and pouring concrete.Once a contractor is selected to build Expanded Environmental Notification Form 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts MITIGATION MEASURES Page 7-8 the Proposed Project, the Proponent is committed to creating construction period dust control, and truck route plans. These potential short-term impacts will be greatly mitigated by the demolition of obsolete buildings, site grading to raise the majority of the property out of the current floodplain elevation, resilient design for residential space elevated above current and future projected SLR floodplain elevations, all electric building (heat, a/c, hot water) with on- site solar PV electrical generation, garage and surface parking with bike storage enclosure and EV charging stations, creation of 1.26± acres of publicly accessible open space with shade trees,landscaping,seating,pathways,pedestrian lighting,and a direct connection across Szetela Lane to the multi-modal path and the shoreline of Collins Cove. Literature Referenced Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Viewer.https://mass- eoeea.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=6f2797652f8f48eaa09759ea6b 2c4a95 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.131,§. 40), https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXIX/Chapter131/Section40 Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations (310 CMR 10.00 & 310 CMR 10.58 (2) (a) 1.d.),https://www.mass.gov/doc/310-cmr-1000-the-wetlands-protection-act Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Atlas of Estimated Habitat of State-listed Rare Wetlands Wildlife. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program,Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581,https://www.mass.gov/service-details/regulatory-maps-priority-estimated-habitats Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management. CZM Stormsmart Coasts. Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List.https://www.mass.gov/service-details/coastal- landscaping-in-massachusetts-plant-list Massachusetts Public Waterfront Act (M.G.L.c. 91) https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXIV/Chapter91 310 CMR 9.00:Waterways Regulations https://www.mass.gov/doc/310-cmr-900- waterways-regulations Metropolitan Area Planning Council Regional Plan Goals and Objectives May 2008, online at http://www.mapc.org/metrofuture National Flood Insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map,Essex County, Massachusetts.July 16, 2014 (Community Panel Number 25009C 0419 G)https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home. Salem Conservation Commission,Chapter 50 Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance.City of Salem, Massachusetts. Salem Conservation Commission,Chapter 50 Wetlands Protection and Conservation Ordinance.City of Salem, Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts Amherst Center for Agriculture,Food, and the Environment. UMass Extension Landscape, Nursery and Urban Forest Program.North American Plants for New England Gardens.Coastal Planting List. https://ag.umass.edu/landscape/fact-sheets/north-american-plants-for-new-england- gardensLynn General Wetlands Protection By-Law. Appendix A Locus Maps Figure 1: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Figure 2: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Figure 3: MassGIS Orthophoto Map <Double-click here to enter title> Figure 1: USGS Topographic Map 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, MA August 15, 2022 <Double-click here to enter title> Figure 3: MassGIS Orthophoto 1 and 2 Lee Fort Terrace Salem, MA August 15, 2022 Appendix B Drainage Report for BC Leefort Terrace LLC Proposed Residential Development Leefort Terrace Salem,MA prepared by Bohler dated July 1, 2022 DRAINAGE REPORT For BC Leefort Terrace LLC PROPOSED Residential Development Leefort Terrace Salem, MA Essex County Prepared by: BOHLER 45 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 (617) 849-8040 TEL. Mark M. Wixted Massachusetts P.E. Lic. #41708 July 01, 2022 #M201067 M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 II. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................. 2 Existing Site Description ............................................................................................... 2 On-Site Soil Information ............................................................................................... 2 Existing Collection and Conveyance ............................................................................ 2 Existing Watersheds and Design Point Information...................................................... 3 III. PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS.............................................................................. 4 Proposed Development Description ............................................................................. 4 Proposed Development Collection and Conveyance ................................................... 4 Proposed Watersheds and Design Point Information ................................................... 4 IV. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 5 Peak Flow Attenuation ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. V. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS ....................................................... 6 Standard #1: No New Untreated Discharges ............................................................... 6 Standard #2: Peak Rate Attenuation ............................................................................ 6 Standard #3: Recharge ................................................................................................ 6 Standard #4: Water Quality .......................................................................................... 6 Standard #5: Land Use with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads ..................................... 6 Standard #6: Critical Areas .......................................................................................... 6 Standard #7: Redevelopment ....................................................................................... 7 Standard #8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control .................................................................................................. 7 Standard #9: Operation and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan) ........................................ 7 Standard #10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges .............................................................. 7 VI. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 8 M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Existing Soil Information ................................................................................. 2 Table 2.2: Existing Design Point Summary ..................................................................... 3 Table 3.2: Proposed Design Point Summary .................................................................. 4 Table 6.1: Design Point Impervious Area Summary ........ Error! Bookmark not defined. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx Table of Contents APPENDICES APPENDIX A: MASSACHUSETTS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST APPENDIX B: PROJECT LOCATION MAPS  USGS MAP  FEMA FIRMETTE APPENDIX C: SOIL AND WETLAND INFORMATION  NCRS CUSTOM SOIL RESOURCE REPORT  REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION APPENDIX D: STORMWATER CALCULATIONS  MA STANDARD #4 – WATER QUALITY AND TSS REMOVAL  BIORETENTION SIZING APPENDIX E: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE  STORMWATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN  INSPECTION REPORT  INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE LOG FORM  LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN  ILLICIT DISCHARGE STATEMENT  SPILL PREVENTION  MANUFACTURER’S INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - 1 - I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report examines the changes in drainage that can be expected as the result of the redevelopment of a proposed residential building located of the southerly side of Szetela Lane in the City of Salem, Massachusetts. The site, which consists of approximately 3.4 acres, contains 8 existing residential buildings with paved private way (Lee Fort Terrace), pedestrian walkways, landscaped areas, and on-street parking. The proposed project includes the construction of a new 33,250 sf footprint residential building along with new paved access drive, parking areas, landscaping, stormwater management components and associated utilities. This report addresses the changes to site runoff conditions as a result of the proposed redevelopment. Additionally, this report provides calculations documenting the design of the proposed stormwater conveyance/management system as illustrated within the accompanying Site Development Plans prepared by Bohler. The project will also provide erosion and sedimentation controls during the demolition and construction periods, as well as long term stabilization of the site. The proposed site falls within the 100-year flood plain as shown in Appendix B, FEMA Firmette. This flood plain is associated with Collins Cove and therefore, the site is considered Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF). The proposed project will reduce the overall impervious area (Table 1.1), as such, the post- development drainage conditions will be an improvement upon existing pre-development drainage conditions and result in a reduction in peak rates of runoff. Table 1.1: Impervious Area Comparison Summary Design Point Name Existing Impervious Area (SF) Proposed Impervious Area (SF) Net Decrease in Impervious Area (SF) DP1 79,624 74,953 4,671 M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS - 2 - II. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing Site Description The site consists of approximately 3.4 acres of land located along the southerly side of Szetela Lane in the City of Salem, Massachusetts. The site is comprised entirely of 8 existing residential buildings with paved private way (Lee Fort Terrace), pedestrian walkways, landscaped areas, and on-street parking. Lee Fort Terrace bisects the site, running from Fort Avenue to the south and Szetela Lane to the north. On-Site Soil Information Soils within the analyzed area consist of the following as classified by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS): Table 2.1: Existing Soil Information Soil Unit Symbol Soil Name / Description Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) 602 Urban Land N/A Onsite soil testing was performed by McPhail Associates, LLC on October 21st to 27th, 2020. Based on the observations as detailed on the Subsurface Exploration Memorandum, the observed soils are consistent with the NRCS Web Soil Survey. Groundwater was observed at depths of 5 to 9 feet below the existing ground surface. Refer to Appendix C for additional information. Existing Collection and Conveyance All runoff from the east and west sections of the site as well as runoff from Lee Fort Terrace is captured by 2 catch basins in Lee Fort Terrace. The runoff is then directed to an existing drain manhole within Szetela Lane via a 12” drain main located under Lee Fort Terrace. The ultimate discharge location is Colins Cove via a 12” pipe from the existing manhole. Slopes on the site range from 1.5%-25% with on-site elevations ranging from 7 at the northern section of Lee Fort Terrace to 10 at the existing buildings and the southerly access point to the property from Fort Avenue. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS - 3 - Existing Watersheds and Design Point Information For the purposes of this analysis, the pre- and post-development drainage conditions were analyzed at one (1) “design point” as described below where stormwater runoff currently drains to under existing conditions. Design Point #1 (DP1) is the 12” drain pipe leaving the site at Szetela Lane. Under existing conditions, this design point receives stormwater flows from approximately 3.4 acres of land. Refer to Table 2.1 below for additional detail. Table 2.1: Existing Design Point Summary Design Point Name Total Area (acres) Existing Impervious (acres) (SF) Existing Pervious (acres) (SF) DP1 3.4± 1.8± 79,624 1.6± 69,278 Refer to Table 1.1 and 6.1 for the existing and proposed impervious area comparison. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS - 4 - III. PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS Proposed Development Description The proposed project includes the construction of a new 33,250 sf footprint residential building along with new paved parking areas, landscaping, storm water management components and associated utilities. The site, including the proposed parking areas, has been designed to drain to bioretention cells. The catch basins will capture and convey stormwater runoff, via an underground pipe system, to the proposed bioretention areas. Pretreatment of stormwater runoff will be provided by a combination of the deep-sump, hooded catch basins and one (1) proprietary treatment unit prior to discharge into the proposed bioretention areas. Proposed Development Collection and Conveyance Deep sump hooded catch basins are proposed to collect and route runoff from the paved parking areas. The remainder of the Site will be collected by the bioretention areas via overland flow. The best management practices (BMPs) incorporated into the proposed stormwater management system have been designed to meet or exceed the standards set forth in the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Handbook standards. Refer to Section V for additional information. Proposed Watersheds and Design Point Information The project has been designed to maintain existing drainage watersheds to the greatest extent possible, with the same design points described in Section II above. Table 3.1: Proposed Design Point Summary Design Point Name Total Area (acres) Proposed Impervious (acres) (SF) Proposed Pervious (acres) (SF) DP1 3.4± 1.7± 74,953 1.7± 73,982 Refer to Table 1.1 and 6.1 for the existing and proposed impervious area comparison. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx METHODOLOGY - 5 - IV. METHODOLOGY Reduction of Impervious Area The proposed redevelopment project will result in a decrease in overall impervious area within the Site (see Table 1.1). As such, the project will result in a net decrease in impervious area and therefore a reduction in peak rates of runoff compared to existing conditions. Additionally, the proposed project meets, or exceeds, the MADEP Stormwater Management standards to the maximum extent possible. Compliance with these standards is described further below. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS - 6 - V. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS Standard #1: No New Untreated Discharges The project has been designed so that proposed impervious areas (excluding the building roof area) shall be collected and passed through the proposed drainage system for treatment prior to discharge. Standard #2: Peak Rate Attenuation As outlined in Section I, the site falls within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage and therefore this standard is not applicable. Additionally, as outlined in Table 1.1 and Table 6.1 the project reduces impervious area which will inherently reduce peak rates in all storm events. Standard #3: Recharge The project as proposed will result in a net decrease of 4,671 square feet of impervious area therefore no recharge is required. The stormwater runoff from portions of the project will be collected and diverted to proposed bioretention areas. These bioretention areas have proposed underdrains to ensure adequate drawdown times. Standard #4: Water Quality Water quality treatment is provided via deep sump catch basins, a proprietary water quality unit, and bioretention areas. TSS removal calculations are included in Appendix D of this report. The project as proposed will involve the creation of 74,953 square feet of impervious area and is required to treat 3,123 cubic feet of water quality volume as defined in Stormwater Standard 4. The proposed bioretention areas provide a total of 4,463 cubic feet of water quality volume below the lowest outlet for water quality treatment. Refer to Appendix D of this report for calculations documenting required and provided water quality volumes. Standard #5: Land Use with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads Not Applicable for this project. Standard #6: Critical Areas Not Applicable for this project. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS - 7 - Standard #7: Redevelopment This project is a redevelopment and is therefore only required to meet the Stormwater Management Standards to the maximum extent possible Standard #8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control The proposed project will provide construction period erosion and sedimentation controls as indicated within the site plan set provided for this project. This includes a proposed construction exit, protection for stormwater inlets, protection around temporary material stock piles and various other techniques as outlined on the erosion and sediment control sheets. Additionally, the project is required to file a Notice of Intent with the US EPA and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during the construction period. The SWPPP will be prepared prior to the start of construction and will be implemented by the site contractor under the guidance and responsibility of the project’s proponent. Standard #9: Operation and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan) An Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for this site has been prepared and is included in Appendix E of this report. The O&M Plan outlines procedures and time tables for the long term operation and maintenance of the proposed site stormwater management system, including initial inspections upon completion of construction, and periodic monitoring of the system components, in accordance with established practices and the manufacturer’s recommendations. The O&M Plan includes a list of responsible parties and an estimated budget for inspections and maintenance. Standard #10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges The proposed stormwater system will only convey allowable non-stormwater discharges (firefighting waters, irrigation, air conditioning condensates, etc.) and will not contain any illicit discharges from prohibited sources. An Illicit Discharge Statement is included in Appendix E of this report. M201067-MA Drainage Report_Rev1.docx SUMMARY - 8 - VI. SUMMARY In summary, the proposed site development illustrated on the drawings prepared by Bohler results in a reduction in impervious area and therefore a reduction in peak rates of runoff from the subject site. In addition, the proposed best management practices will result in an effective removal of total suspended solids from the post-development runoff. The pre-development versus post- development impervious area comparisons are contained in Table 6.1 below: Table 6.1: Impervious Area Comparison Summary Design Point Name Existing Impervious Area (SF) Proposed Impervious Area (SF) Net Decrease in Impervious Area (SF) DP1 79,624 74,953 4,671 As outlined in the table above, the proposed development as designed will provide a decrease in impervious area and provide inherent improvements to peak runoff rates, groundwater recharge, and water quality. Additionally, the project meets or exceeds the MADEP Stormwater Management Standards as described further herein. APPENDIX A: MASSACHUSETTS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 1 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report A. Introduction Important: When filling out forms on the computer, use only the tab key to move your cursor - do not use the return key. A Stormwater Report must be submitted with the Notice of Intent permit application to document compliance with the Stormwater Management Standards. The following checklist is NOT a substitute for the Stormwater Report (which should provide more substantive and detailed information) but is offered here as a tool to help the applicant organize their Stormwater Management documentation for their Report and for the reviewer to assess this information in a consistent format. As noted in the Checklist, the Stormwater Report must contain the engineering computations and supporting information set forth in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The Stormwater Report must be prepared and certified by a Registered Professional Engineer (RPE) licensed in the Commonwealth. The Stormwater Report must include: · The Stormwater Checklist completed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer (see page 2) that certifies that the Stormwater Report contains all required submittals.1 This Checklist is to be used as the cover for the completed Stormwater Report. · Applicant/Project Name · Project Address · Name of Firm and Registered Professional Engineer that prepared the Report · Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan required by Standards 4-6 · Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan required by Standard 82 · Operation and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9 In addition to all plans and supporting information, the Stormwater Report must include a brief narrative describing stormwater management practices, including environmentally sensitive site design and LID techniques, along with a diagram depicting runoff through the proposed BMP treatment train. Plans are required to show existing and proposed conditions, identify all wetland resource areas, NRCS soil types, critical areas, Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPL), and any areas on the site where infiltration rate is greater than 2.4 inches per hour. The Plans shall identify the drainage areas for both existing and proposed conditions at a scale that enables verification of supporting calculations. As noted in the Checklist, the Stormwater Management Report shall document compliance with each of the Stormwater Management Standards as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The soils evaluation and calculations shall be done using the methodologies set forth in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. To ensure that the Stormwater Report is complete, applicants are required to fill in the Stormwater Report Checklist by checking the box to indicate that the specified information has been included in the Stormwater Report. If any of the information specified in the checklist has not been submitted, the applicant must provide an explanation. The completed Stormwater Report Checklist and Certification must be submitted with the Stormwater Report. 1 The Stormwater Report may also include the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement required by Standard 10. If not included in the Stormwater Report, the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement must be submitted prior to the discharge of stormwater runoff to the post-construction best management practices. 2 For some complex projects, it may not be possible to include the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan in the Stormwater Report. In that event, the issuing authority has the discretion to issue an Order of Conditions that approves the project and includes a condition requiring the proponent to submit the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan before commencing any land disturbance activity on the site. M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 2 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report B. Stormwater Checklist and Certification The following checklist is intended to serve as a guide for applicants as to the elements that ordinarily need to be addressed in a complete Stormwater Report. The checklist is also intended to provide conservation commissions and other reviewing authorities with a summary of the components necessary for a comprehensive Stormwater Report that addresses the ten Stormwater Standards. Note: Because stormwater requirements vary from project to project, it is possible that a complete Stormwater Report may not include information on some of the subjects specified in the Checklist. If it is determined that a specific item does not apply to the project under review, please note that the item is not applicable (N.A.) and provide the reasons for that determination. A complete checklist must include the Certification set forth below signed by the Registered Professional Engineer who prepared the Stormwater Report. Registered Professional Engineer’s Certification I have reviewed the Stormwater Report, including the soil evaluation, computations, Long-term Pollution Prevention Plan, the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (if included), the Long- term Post-Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan, the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement (if included) and the plans showing the stormwater management system, and have determined that they have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards as further elaborated by the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. I have also determined that the information presented in the Stormwater Checklist is accurate and that the information presented in the Stormwater Report accurately reflects conditions at the site as of the date of this permit application. Registered Professional Engineer Block and Signature Signature and Date Checklist Project Type: Is the application for new development, redevelopment, or a mix of new and redevelopment? New development Redevelopment Mix of New Development and Redevelopment M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 3 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) LID Measures: Stormwater Standards require LID measures to be considered. Document what environmentally sensitive design and LID Techniques were considered during the planning and design of the project: No disturbance to any Wetland Resource Areas Site Design Practices (e.g. clustered development, reduced frontage setbacks) Reduced Impervious Area (Redevelopment Only) Minimizing disturbance to existing trees and shrubs LID Site Design Credit Requested: Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3 Use of “country drainage” versus curb and gutter conveyance and pipe Bioretention Cells (includes Rain Gardens) Constructed Stormwater Wetlands (includes Gravel Wetlands designs) Treebox Filter Water Quality Swale Grass Channel Green Roof Other (describe): Standard 1: No New Untreated Discharges No new untreated discharges Outlets have been designed so there is no erosion or scour to wetlands and waters of the Commonwealth Supporting calculations specified in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook included. M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 4 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 2: Peak Rate Attenuation Standard 2 waiver requested because the project is located in land subject to coastal storm flowage and stormwater discharge is to a wetland subject to coastal flooding. Evaluation provided to determine whether off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm. Calculations provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre- development rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour storms. If evaluation shows that off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm, calculations are also provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development rates for the 100-year 24- hour storm. Standard 3: Recharge Soil Analysis provided. Required Recharge Volume calculation provided. Required Recharge volume reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits. Sizing the infiltration, BMPs is based on the following method: Check the method used. Static Simple Dynamic Dynamic Field1 Runoff from all impervious areas at the site discharging to the infiltration BMP. Runoff from all impervious areas at the site is not discharging to the infiltration BMP and calculations are provided showing that the drainage area contributing runoff to the infiltration BMPs is sufficient to generate the required recharge volume. Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume. Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume only to the maximum extent practicable for the following reason: Site is comprised solely of C and D soils and/or bedrock at the land surface M.G.L. c. 21E sites pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000 Solid Waste Landfill pursuant to 310 CMR 19.000 Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent practicable. Calculations showing that the infiltration BMPs will drain in 72 hours are provided. Property includes a M.G.L. c. 21E site or a solid waste landfill and a mounding analysis is included. 1 80% TSS removal is required prior to discharge to infiltration BMP if Dynamic Field method is used. M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 5 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 3: Recharge (continued) The infiltration BMP is used to attenuate peak flows during storms greater than or equal to the 10- year 24-hour storm and separation to seasonal high groundwater is less than 4 feet and a mounding analysis is provided. Documentation is provided showing that infiltration BMPs do not adversely impact nearby wetland resource areas. Standard 4: Water Quality The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan typically includes the following: · Good housekeeping practices; · Provisions for storing materials and waste products inside or under cover; · Vehicle washing controls; · Requirements for routine inspections and maintenance of stormwater BMPs; · Spill prevention and response plans; · Provisions for maintenance of lawns, gardens, and other landscaped areas; · Requirements for storage and use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides; · Pet waste management provisions; · Provisions for operation and management of septic systems; · Provisions for solid waste management; · Snow disposal and plowing plans relative to Wetland Resource Areas; · Winter Road Salt and/or Sand Use and Storage restrictions; · Street sweeping schedules; · Provisions for prevention of illicit discharges to the stormwater management system; · Documentation that Stormwater BMPs are designed to provide for shutdown and containment in the event of a spill or discharges to or near critical areas or from LUHPPL; · Training for staff or personnel involved with implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan; · List of Emergency contacts for implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan. A Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan is attached to Stormwater Report and is included as an attachment to the Wetlands Notice of Intent. Treatment BMPs subject to the 44% TSS removal pretreatment requirement and the one inch rule for calculating the water quality volume are included, and discharge: is within the Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area is near or to other critical areas is within soils with a rapid infiltration rate (greater than 2.4 inches per hour) involves runoff from land uses with higher potential pollutant loads. The Required Water Quality Volume is reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits. Calculations documenting that the treatment train meets the 80% TSS removal requirement and, if applicable, the 44% TSS removal pretreatment requirement, are provided. M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 6 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 4: Water Quality (continued) The BMP is sized (and calculations provided) based on: The ½” or 1” Water Quality Volume or The equivalent flow rate associated with the Water Quality Volume and documentation is provided showing that the BMP treats the required water quality volume. The applicant proposes to use proprietary BMPs, and documentation supporting use of proprietary BMP and proposed TSS removal rate is provided. This documentation may be in the form of the propriety BMP checklist found in Volume 2, Chapter 4 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook and submitting copies of the TARP Report, STEP Report, and/or other third party studies verifying performance of the proprietary BMPs. A TMDL exists that indicates a need to reduce pollutants other than TSS and documentation showing that the BMPs selected are consistent with the TMDL is provided. Standard 5: Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPLs) The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been included with the Stormwater Report. The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the SWPPP will be submitted prior to the discharge of stormwater to the post-construction stormwater BMPs. The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit does not cover the land use. LUHPPLs are located at the site and industry specific source control and pollution prevention measures have been proposed to reduce or eliminate the exposure of LUHPPLs to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff, and been included in the long term Pollution Prevention Plan. All exposure has been eliminated. All exposure has not been eliminated and all BMPs selected are on MassDEP LUHPPL list. The LUHPPL has the potential to generate runoff with moderate to higher concentrations of oil and grease (e.g. all parking lots with >1000 vehicle trips per day) and the treatment train includes an oil grit separator, a filtering bioretention area, a sand filter or equivalent. Standard 6: Critical Areas The discharge is near or to a critical area and the treatment train includes only BMPs that MassDEP has approved for stormwater discharges to or near that particular class of critical area. Critical areas and BMPs are identified in the Stormwater Report. M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 7 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 7: Redevelopments and Other Projects Subject to the Standards only to the maximum extent practicable The project is subject to the Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum Extent Practicable as a: Limited Project Small Residential Projects: 5-9 single family houses or 5-9 units in a multi-family development provided there is no discharge that may potentially affect a critical area. Small Residential Projects: 2-4 single family houses or 2-4 units in a multi-family development with a discharge to a critical area Marina and/or boatyard provided the hull painting, service and maintenance areas are protected from exposure to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff Bike Path and/or Foot Path Redevelopment Project Redevelopment portion of mix of new and redevelopment. Certain standards are not fully met (Standard No. 1, 8, 9, and 10 must always be fully met) and an explanation of why these standards are not met is contained in the Stormwater Report. The project involves redevelopment and a description of all measures that have been taken to improve existing conditions is provided in the Stormwater Report. The redevelopment checklist found in Volume 2 Chapter 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook may be used to document that the proposed stormwater management system (a) complies with Standards 2, 3 and the pretreatment and structural BMP requirements of Standards 4-6 to the maximum extent practicable and (b) improves existing conditions. Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must include the following information: · Narrative; · Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan; · Names of Persons or Entity Responsible for Plan Compliance; · Construction Period Pollution Prevention Measures; · Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Drawings; · Detail drawings and specifications for erosion control BMPs, including sizing calculations; · Vegetation Planning; · Site Development Plan; · Construction Sequencing Plan; · Sequencing of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls; · Operation and Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls; · Inspection Schedule; · Maintenance Schedule; · Inspection and Maintenance Log Form. A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan containing the information set forth above has been included in the Stormwater Report. M201067-MA Stormwater Checklist.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 8 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report Checklist (continued) Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control (continued) The project is highly complex and information is included in the Stormwater Report that explains why it is not possible to submit the Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with the application. A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control has not been included in the Stormwater Report but will be submitted before land disturbance begins. The project is not covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit. The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit and a copy of the SWPPP is in the Stormwater Report. The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit but no SWPPP been submitted. The SWPPP will be submitted BEFORE land disturbance begins. Standard 9: Operation and Maintenance Plan The Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan is included in the Stormwater Report and includes the following information: Name of the stormwater management system owners; Party responsible for operation and maintenance; Schedule for implementation of routine and non-routine maintenance tasks; Plan showing the location of all stormwater BMPs maintenance access areas; Description and delineation of public safety features; Estimated operation and maintenance budget; and Operation and Maintenance Log Form. The responsible party is not the owner of the parcel where the BMP is located and the Stormwater Report includes the following submissions: A copy of the legal instrument (deed, homeowner’s association, utility trust or other legal entity) that establishes the terms of and legal responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the project site stormwater BMPs; A plan and easement deed that allows site access for the legal entity to operate and maintain BMP functions. Standard 10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan includes measures to prevent illicit discharges; An Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached; NO Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached but will be submitted prior to the discharge of any stormwater to post-construction BMPs. APPENDIX B: PROJECT LOCATION MAPS  USGS MAP  FEMA FIRMETTE USGS MAPLEE FORT TERRACE,SALEM, MASCALE:1"=1000' DATE: 03/21/2022PREPARED BYSITESOURCE: MASSGIS OLIVER - USGS BOSTON NORTH QUADRANGLEWES FEMA FIRMETTELEE FORT TERRACE,SALEM, MASCALE:1"=1000' DATE: 03/21/2022PREPARED BYSITEWES APPENDIX C: SOIL AND WETLAND INFORMATION  NCRS CUSTOM SOIL RESOURCE REPORT  REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Hydrologic Soil Group—Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part (Leefort Terrace) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/30/2022 Page 1 of 44709810470989047099704710050471013047102104709730470981047098904709970471005047101304710210345090345170345250345330345410345490345570345650345730345810 345090 345170 345250 345330 345410 345490 345570 345650 345730 345810 42° 31' 44'' N 70° 53' 10'' W42° 31' 44'' N70° 52' 37'' W42° 31' 28'' N 70° 53' 10'' W42° 31' 28'' N 70° 52' 37'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 19N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,480 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 2, 2021 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 10, 2014—Sep 19, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydrologic Soil Group—Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part (Leefort Terrace) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/30/2022 Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 602 Urban land 27.2 55.6% 626B Merrimac-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes A 7.2 14.7% 651 Udorthents, smoothed 7.4 15.1% Totals for Area of Interest 49.0 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Hydrologic Soil Group—Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part Leefort Terrace Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/30/2022 Page 3 of 4 Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Hydrologic Soil Group—Essex County, Massachusetts, Southern Part Leefort Terrace Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/30/2022 Page 4 of 4 Memorandum GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 2269 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 (617) 868-1420 Page 1 of 2 Date: November 6, 2020 Recipient: Beacon Communities, LLC. Attention: Ms. Courtney Koslow Sender: Zachary M. Holman, Thomas J. Fennick, P.E., L.S.P. Project: Lee Fort Terrace; Salem, Massachusetts Project No: 7070.2.00 Subject: Results of Recent Subsurface Exploration Program This memorandum presents the results of the recent subsurface exploration program for the referenced project. During the period of October 21 to 27, 2020, a subsurface exploration program consisting of eleven (11) borings, B-1 through B-11, was performed by Carr-Dee Corp. under contract to McPhail Associates, LLC. Utilizing a truck and track-mounted drill-rigs, the borings were advanced utilizing hollow-stem augers to depths ranging from approximately 21 to 42 feet below ground surface. Approximate boring locations are as indicated on Figure 2. Logs of the borings prepared by Carr-Dee Corp. are attached. The subsurface conditions encountered in the borings can be summarized as follows: • Ground Surface Coverings: The ground surface at the boring locations consisted of either an approximately 3-inch thickness of asphalt pavement, or soil cover. The soil cover consisted of topsoil ranging from 0.3 to 1-foot in thickness, or granular fill. • Urban Fill: Underlying the asphalt pavement or topsoil, or beginning from ground surface, granular “urban” fill was encountered extending to depths of about 7 to 19 feet below the existing ground surface. The fill material consisted of a very loose to dense, dark brown to gray black, silt, and sand, some to trace clay and gravel, with varying amounts of wood, glass, brick, ash and cinder. • Discontinuous Organic Deposit: Within two (2) borings (B-1 and B-7(OW)) a deposit of organic silt was encountered beneath the urban fill, approximately 2 to 1 foot thick, respectively. • Marine Clay: A natural marine clay deposit ranging from 7 to 27.6 feet thick was encountered underlying the fill and/or organic silt layers. The marine clay consists of a firm to very stiff, mottled blue/gray to yellow/gray, silty clay, with intermittent sand seams. Memorandum GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 2269 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 (617) 868-1420 Page 2 of 2 • Glacial Outwash: Underlying the marine clay, a natural glacial outwash sand and gravel deposit was encountered, the surface of which ranging from about 17.0 to 38.0 feet below existing ground surface. The glacial outwash deposit was observed to consist of a compact to very dense, gray, sand, and gravel, some to trace silt and clay varying to silt, sand, and clay with some gravel. • Termination of Borings – Refusal: A total of six (6) borings (B-1, B-2, B-6, B-7(OW), B-9(OW), and B-11) encountered refusal at depths ranging from about 21 to 39.8 feet below ground surface. • Groundwater: Groundwater was observed at depths of 5 to 9 feet below the existing ground surface. We trust that the above information is sufficient for your present requirements. Should you have any questions concerning the information presented herein, please do not hesitate to call us. Attachments: Preliminary Subsurface Exploration Plan Boring Logs B-1 through B-11 N:\Working Documents\Jobs\7070 - Lee Fort Terrace\McPhail Correspondence\7070_LeeFortTerrace_SubsurfaceExploration_Memo_110620.docx ZMH/tjf Approximate Location of Proposed BoringGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS B-1B-3 (OW)B-2B-4B-5 (OW)B-6B-8B-7 B-9(OW)B-10 B-11 Approximate Location of Borehole Performed by Carr-Dee Corp. During the Period of October 21 -27, 2020 for McPhail Associates, LLC(ow)--Indicates Observation Well Installed WithinCompleted BoreholeLegendPreliminary Subsurface Exploration PlanForBeacon Communities, LLC.ByMcPhail Associates, LLC. 6" 19' 21' 36'6" 38'9" GROUND SURFACE - R E F U S A L - (NO PENETRATION WITH ROLLER BIT) WATER LEVEL 5' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 5'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 20'0" DRILLER: S. DESIMONE, JR., INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-22-2020 LOAM (TOPSOIL) VERY LOOSE TO DENSE, DARK BROWN TO GREYISH BLACK, SILT & SAND, WITH ASH & CINDER, VARYING TO CLAY, SILT, & SAND, SOME GRAVEL WITH WOOD, BRICK, CONCRETE, ASH & CINDER (FILL) VERY SOFT, GREY ORGANIC SILT, SOME SAND (ORGANICS) SOFT TO FIRM, MOTTLED YELLOW TO GREY, SILTY CLAY WITH INTERMITTEN SAND SEAMS(MARINE CLAY) COMPACT, GREY, SILT, CLAY, SAND, & GRAVEL (GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 0' to 6" (4) RECOVERED 6 in. S#1A, 6" to 2' (4-5-3) RECOVERED 8 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (2-21-12-4) RECOVERED 6 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (3-2-1-1) RECOVERED 13 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (1-1-1-1) RECOVERED 10 in. S#5, 12' to 14' (3-2-3-3) RECOVERED 20 in. S#6, 15' to 17' (2-2-1-1) RECOVERED 8 in. S#7, 17' to 19' (3-4-4-3) RECOVERED 6 in. S#8, 20' to 21' (1/12") RECOVERED 8 in. S#8A, 21' to 22' (2-2) RECOVERED 12 in. S#9, 25' to 27' (2-3-3-6) RECOVERED 24 in. S#10, 30' to 32' (1-1-2-2) RECOVERED 24 in. S#11, 35' to 36'6" (WOH/6"-2-2) RECOVERED 18 in. S#11, 36'6" to 37' (13) RECOVERED 4 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 1 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 3" 10' 18' 23'2" GROUND SURFACE - R E F U S A L - (NO PENETRATION WITH ROLLER BIT) WATER LEVEL 5' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 5'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 10'0" DRILLER: S. DESIMONE, JR., INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-21-2020 ASPHALT COMPACT, BROWN, GRAVELLY SAND, SOME TO TRACE SILT VARYING TO VERY LOOSE TO LOOSE, BLACK SILT, & SAND, WITH WOOD, GLASS, ASH, & CINDERS (FILL) VERY DENSE, GRAY, SAND & GRAVEL, SOME SILT(GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 6" to 2'6" (10-10-5-6) RECOVERED 18 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (3-3-1-1) RECOVERED 6 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (3-1-2-2) RECOVERED 4 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (5-4-6-6) RECOVERED 16 in. S#5, 15' to 17' (4-6-9-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#6, 20' to 22' (20-44-31-42) RECOVERED 10 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 2 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 STIFF TO VERY STIFF, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY, SILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) 1' 12' 22' GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 8' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 5'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 12'0" DRILLER: S. DESIMONE, JR., INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-21-2020 LOAM (TOPSOIL) FIRM TO STIFF, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY TO BLUE/GRAY SILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) S#1, 0' to 1' (4-4) RECOVERED 8 in. S#1A, 1' to 2' (6-7) RECOVERED 8 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (1-1-1-2) RECOVERED 5 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (4-10-2-1) RECOVERED 10 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (1/12"-1/12") RECOVERED 4 in. S#5, 12' to 14' (5-6-7-7) RECOVERED 20 in. S#6, 15' to 17' (3-4-6-7) RECOVERED 24 in. S#7, 20' to 22' (3-4-4-5) RECOVERED 24 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 3(OW) All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 LOOSE TO COMPACT, YELLOWISH BROWN, SILT AND SAND, TRACE GRAVEL VARYING TO VERY LOOSE TO COMPACT, GRAYISH BLACK SILT, & SAND, WITH WOOD, GLASS, ASH, & CINDERS (FILL) 1' 12'6" 22'6" 27' GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 9' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 5'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 20'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-22-2020 LOAM (TOPSOIL) STIFF, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY TO BLUE/GRAY, SILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) VERY DENSE, GRAY, SAND & GRAVEL, TRACE SILT(GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 0' to 2' (1-2) RECOVERED 10 in. S#1A, 1' to 2' (2-2) RECOVERED 10 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (8-4-3-3) RECOVERED 10 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (2-3-2-3) RECOVERED 12 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (1-2-1/12") RECOVERED 3 in. S#5, 12' to 12'6" (1) RECOVERED 6 in. S#5A, 12'6" to 14' (6-7-7) RECOVERED 18 in. S#6, 15' to 17' (5-6-6-8) RECOVERED 22 in. S#7, 20' to 22' (4-4-5-8) RECOVERED 24 in. S#8, 25' to 27' (32-51-27-26) RECOVERED 11 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 4 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 VERY LOOSE TO LOOSE, YELLOWISH BROWN, SILTY SAND, TRACE GRAVEL VARYING TO DARK BROWN SILT, SAND, & GRAVEL, WITH WOOD, GLASS, ASH, & CINDERS (FILL) 3" 9'6" 20'6" 22' GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 5' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 5'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 10'0" DRILLER: S. DESIMONE, JR., INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-21-2020 ASPHALT VERY LOOSE TO LOOSE, BLACK, SILT & SAND, TRACE GRAVEL, WITH ASH & CINDER (FILL) STIFF, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAYSILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) DENSE, YELLOWISH GRAY, SILTY SAND & GRAVEL, SOME SILT (GLACIAL O.) S#1, 6" to 2'6" (3-2-2-2) RECOVERED 12 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (1/12"-1/12") RECOVERED 12 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (1/12"-1-1) RECOVERED 14 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (5-5-8-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#5, 15' to 17' (3-4-6-7) RECOVERED 24 in. S#6, 20' to 20'6" (5) RECOVERED 6 in. S#6A, 20'6" to 22' (17-14-18) RECOVERED 8 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 5(OW) All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 6" 7' 17' 21' GROUND SURFACE - R E F U S A L - (NO PENETRATION WITH ROLLER BIT) WATER LEVEL 7' SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 8'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-23-2020 LOAM (TOPSOIL) STIFF, MOTTLED BLUE/GRAY TO YELLOW, SILTY CLAY, WITH PEAT FIBERS(MARINE CLAY) VERY DENSE, GRAY, SAND & GRAVEL, SOME SILTGLACIAL OUTWASH) s#1, 0' to 6" (4) RECOVERED 6 in. S#1A, 6" to 2' (5-4-4) RECOVERED 10 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (7-4-2-2) RECOVERED 12 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (3-3-5-7) RECOVERED 22 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (3-4-7-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#5, 15' to 17' (4-4-7-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#6, 20' to 20'3" (100/4") RECOVERED 4 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 6 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 LOOSE TO COMPACT, BLACK TO YELLOWISH BROWN, SILT & SAND, TRACE GRAVEL,VARYING TO GRAYISH BROWN, SILTY CLAY WITH ASH & CINDER (FILL) 11' 12' 25' 27'6" 36'3" GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 8'6" SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 5'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 12'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-23-2020 VERY DENSE GRAYISH BROWN SILTY SAND, & GRAVEL, VARYING TO LOOSEBLACK SILT AND SAND, WITH ASPHALT, GLASS, ASH, & CINDER (FILL) SOFT, BLACK, ORGANIC SILT, SOMESAND (ORGANICS) STIFF TO VERY STIFF, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY TO BLUE/GRAY SILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) FIRM, GRAY, SILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) DENSE TO VERY DENSE, GRAY, SILTY SAND, SOME GRAVEL, TRACE COBBLES (GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 0' to 2' (20-33-21-27) RECOVERED 22 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (3-4-5-6) RECOVERED 2 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (6-4-6-8) RECOVERED 3 in. S#4, 10' to 11' (5-4) RECOVERED 8 in. S#4A, 11' to 12' (2-2) RECOVERED 4 in. S#5, 15' to 17' (5-5-7-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#6, 20' to 22' (3-4-5-6) RECOVERED 24 in. S#8, 25' to 27' (2-2-2-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#9, 30' to 32' (16-17-19-12) RECOVERED 10 in. S#10, 35' to 35'3" (100/3") RECOVERED 3 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 7 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 - R E F U S A L -(NO PENETRATION WITH ROLLER BIT) 10'6" 33'6" 37' GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 7'6" SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 7'6" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 14'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-26-2020 COMPACT TO DENSE, GRAYISH BROWN, SAND, SILT, & GRAVEL, VARYING TO VERY LOOSE, BLACK, ORGANIC SILT AND SAND (FILL) DENSE, GRAY, SAND & GRAVEL, TRACE TO SOME SILT(GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 0' to 2' (3-6-9-10) RECOVERED 14 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (26-17-16-19) RECOVERED 11 in. S#3, 7'6" to 9'6" (20-12-8-5) RECOVERED 8 in. S#4, 10' to 10'3" (2) RECOVERED 4 in. S#4A, 10'6" to 12' (4-8-8) RECOVERED 16 in. S#5, 15' to 17' (6-6-9-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#6, 20' to 22' (1-3-3-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#7, 25' to 27' (2-2-3-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#8, 30' to 32' (1-1-3-3) RECOVERED 24 in. S#9, 35' to 37' (31-18-19-24) RECOVERED 12 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 8 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 LOAM (TOPSOIL)4" VERY STIFF TO FIRM, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY TO BLUE/GRAY, SILTY CLAY WITH INTERMITTEN SAND SEAMS (MARINE CLAY) 13'6" 38' 39'10" GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 8' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 10'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 15'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-26-2020 VERY DENSE, GRAY, SAND & GRAVEL(GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 0' to 2' (3-4-5-31) RECOVERED 8 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (4-3-5-3) RECOVERED 2 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (3-1-2-2) RECOVERED 1 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (6-4-3-4) RECOVERED 8 in. S#5, 12' to 13'6" (3-3-4) RECOVERED 11 in. S#5A, 13'6" to 14' (8) RECOVERED 4 in. S#6, 15' to 17' (7-5-8-8) RECOVERED 16 in. S#7, 20' to 22' (2-2-3-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#8, 25' to 27' (1-2-3-3) RECOVERED 24 in. S#9, 30' to 32' (1-2-3-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#10, 35' to 37' (1-2-3-2) RECOVERED 24 in. S#11, 39'10" to 39'10" (100/0") RECOVERED 0 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 9(OW) All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 STIFF TO FIRM, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY TO BLUE/GRAY, SILTY CLAY WITH INTERMITTEN SAND SEAMS (MARINE CLAY) LOOSE TO VERY LOOSE, DARK BROWN TO BLACK, SILT & SAND, SOME TO TRACE GRAVEL, WITH WOOD, BRICK, ASH & CINDER (FILL) - R E F U S A L -(NO PENETRATION WITH ROLLER BIT) 6"LOAM (TOPSOIL) 6" 14'6" 31' 42' GROUND SURFACE WATER LEVEL 8'6" SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 10'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 15'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-27-2020 LOAM (TOPSOIL) VERY LOOSE TO COMPACT, DARK BROWN TO BLACK, SILT & SAND, SOME TO TRACE GRAVEL & CLAY, WITH, ASH & CINDER (FILL) STIFF TO FIRM, MOTTLED YELLOW/GRAY TO BLUE/GRAY, SILTY CLAY WITH INTERMITTEN SAND SEAMS(MARINE CLAY) COMPACT, GRAY, SILT, SAND, & CLAY, TRACE TO SOME GRAVEL(GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 6" to 2'6" (3-6-8-7) RECOVERED 12 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (2-2-1-1) RECOVERED 3 in. S#3, 7' to 9' (1-1-1-1) RECOVERED 10 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (1-1-3-1) RECOVERED 8 in. S#5, 12' to 14' (1-1-1-3) RECOVERED 8 in. S#6, 15' to 17' (4-5-6-7) RECOVERED 8 in. S#7, 20' to 22' (1-2-2-3) RECOVERED 24 in. S#8, 25' to 27' (1-2-3-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#9, 30' to 31' (3-2) RECOVERED 12 in. S#9A, 31' to 32' (7-5) RECOVERED 12 in. S#10, 35' to 37' (8-10-16-14) RECOVERED 16 in. S#11, 40' to 42' (11-15-11-13) RECOVERED 18 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 10 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 8' 35'6" 37'4" GROUND SURFACE - R E F U S A L - (NO PENETRATION WITH ROLLER BIT) WATER LEVEL 9' SIZE OF AUGERS: 2-1/4" I.D., LENGTH: 10'0" SIZE OF CASING: NW, LENGTH: 15'0" DRILLER: G. SMITH, INSPECTOR: T. CORMICAN DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 10-27-2020 LOOSE TO COMPACT, DARK BROWN TO BLACK, SILT & SAND, WITH WOOD, BRICK, ASH, & CINDER (FILL) STIFF TO FIRM, MOTTLED BLUE/GRAYTO YELLOW/GRAY, SILTY CLAY(MARINE CLAY) COMPACT, GRAY, SAND, TRACE SILT & GRAVEL (GLACIAL OUTWASH) S#1, 0' to 2' (2-3-9-7) RECOVERED 16 in. S#2, 5' to 7' (5-4-4-3) RECOVERED 13 in. S#3, 7' to 8' (3-3) RECOVERED 6 in. S#3A, 8' to 9' (5-5) RECOVERED 6 in. S#4, 10' to 12' (5-6-9-9) RECOVERED 24 in. S#5, 15' to 17' (3-3-6-5) RECOVERED 24 in. S#6, 20' to 22' (2-2-3-3) RECOVERED 24 in. S#7, 30' to 32' (2-2-3-4) RECOVERED 24 in. S#8, S#8A, 35' to 35'6" (3) RECOVERED 6 in. 35'6" to 37' (13-7-20) RECOVERED 10 in. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (781) 391-4500 To: MCPHAIL ASSOC., LLC, 2269 MASS. AVE., CAMBRIDGE, MA Date: 10-27-2020 Job No.: 2020-133 Location: 1-58 LEE FORT TERRACE, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 6 ft. BORING 11 All samples have been visually classified by . Unless otherwise specified, water levels noted were observed at completion of borings, and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 inches using 140 lb. weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted) indicate number of blows to drive casing one foot, using 300 lb. weight falling 24 inches (±). Sheet 1 of 1 6"LOAM (TOPSOIL) APPENDIX D: STORMWATER CALCULATIONS  MA STANDARD #4 – WATER QUALITY AND TSS REMOVAL  BIORETENTION SIZING Water Quality Volume runoff (in.)*0.5 Total Post Development Impervious Area (sf) 74,953 Required Water Quality Volume (cf)3,123 Bioretention Area 1 394 Bioretention Area 2 4,069 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Provided Water Quality Volume (cf)4,463 Required Recharge Provided *Volume provided below overflow structure to be filtered through bioretention media in cubic feet (cf) Water Quality Volume Provided* Leefort Terrace Leefort Terrace Salem, MA MA DEP Standard 4: Water Quality Volume Calculations *Water Quality volume runoff is equal to 0.5 inches of runoff times the total impervious area of the post development project site. Bohler Job Number: M201067 July 1, 2022 Water Quality Volume Required Prepared By: 45 Franklin Street, Floor 5 Bostont, MA 02110 (617) 849-8040 7/1/2022 BMP Treatment Train:A B C D ETSS Removal Starting TSS Amount RemainingBMP Rate Load* Removed (B*C) Load (C-D)Deep Sump Hooded Catch Basin0.25 1.00 0.25 0.75Water Quality Unit 0.25 0.75 0.19 0.56Bioretention Area0.90 0.56 0.51 0.06 Total TSS Removal = 94%*Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E) which enters BMPMA DEP Standard 4: TSS Removal Calculation WorksheetDrivewayLeefort TerraceLeefort TerraceSalem, MABohler Job Number: M201067July 1, 2022Prepared By: 45 Franklin Street, Floor 5Bostont, MA 02110(617) 849-80407/1/2022 BMP Treatment Train:A B C D ETSS Removal Starting TSS Amount RemainingBMP Rate Load* Removed (B*C) Load (C-D)Bioretention Area 0.90 1.00 0.90 0.10 Total TSS Removal = 90%*Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E) which enters BMPParking Turnaround and Site SidewalksLeefort TerraceLeefort TerraceSalem, MABohler Job Number: M201067July 1, 2022MA DEP Standard 4: TSS Removal Calculation WorksheetPrepared By: 45 Franklin Street, Floor 5Bostont, MA 02110(617) 849-80407/1/2022 Rainfall not specifiedM201067_BioretentionVolumes_Rev1 Printed 7/1/2022Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 1HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 08311 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Bio 1 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 9.00 245 0 9.01 248 2 9.02 251 5 9.03 254 7 9.04 257 10 9.05 260 13 9.06 263 15 9.07 266 18 9.08 269 21 9.09 272 23 9.10 275 26 9.11 278 29 9.12 281 32 9.13 284 34 9.14 287 37 9.15 290 40 9.16 293 43 9.17 296 46 9.18 299 49 9.19 302 52 9.20 305 55 9.21 308 58 9.22 311 61 9.23 314 64 9.24 317 67 9.25 320 71 9.26 322 74 9.27 325 77 9.28 328 80 9.29 331 84 9.30 334 87 9.31 337 90 9.32 340 94 9.33 343 97 9.34 346 101 9.35 349 104 9.36 352 108 9.37 355 111 9.38 358 115 9.39 361 118 9.40 364 122 9.41 367 125 9.42 370 129 9.43 373 133 9.44 376 137 9.45 379 140 9.46 382 144 9.47 385 148 9.48 388 152 9.49 391 156 9.50 394 160 9.51 397 164 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 9.52 400 168 9.53 403 172 9.54 406 176 9.55 409 180 9.56 412 184 9.57 415 188 9.58 418 192 9.59 421 196 9.60 424 201 9.61 427 205 9.62 430 209 9.63 433 213 9.64 436 218 9.65 439 222 9.66 442 227 9.67 445 231 9.68 448 235 9.69 451 240 9.70 454 245 9.71 457 249 9.72 460 254 9.73 463 258 9.74 466 263 9.75 469 268 9.76 471 272 9.77 474 277 9.78 477 282 9.79 480 287 9.80 483 291 9.81 486 296 9.82 489 301 9.83 492 306 9.84 495 311 9.85 498 316 9.86 501 321 9.87 504 326 9.88 507 331 9.89 510 336 9.90 513 341 9.91 516 346 9.92 519 352 9.93 522 357 9.94 525 362 9.95 528 367 9.96 531 373 9.97 534 378 9.98 537 383 9.99 540 389 10.00 543 394 Rainfall not specifiedM201067_BioretentionVolumes_Rev1 Printed 7/1/2022Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 08311 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 2P: Bio 2 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 6.00 623 0 6.02 678 13 6.04 734 27 6.06 789 42 6.08 845 59 6.10 900 76 6.12 956 95 6.14 1,011 114 6.16 1,067 135 6.18 1,122 157 6.20 1,178 180 6.22 1,233 204 6.24 1,289 229 6.26 1,344 256 6.28 1,400 283 6.30 1,455 312 6.32 1,511 341 6.34 1,566 372 6.36 1,622 404 6.38 1,677 437 6.40 1,733 471 6.42 1,788 506 6.44 1,844 543 6.46 1,900 580 6.48 1,955 619 6.50 2,011 658 6.52 2,066 699 6.54 2,122 741 6.56 2,177 784 6.58 2,233 828 6.60 2,288 873 6.62 2,344 920 6.64 2,399 967 6.66 2,455 1,016 6.68 2,510 1,065 6.70 2,566 1,116 6.72 2,621 1,168 6.74 2,677 1,221 6.76 2,732 1,275 6.78 2,788 1,330 6.80 2,843 1,386 6.82 2,899 1,444 6.84 2,954 1,502 6.86 3,010 1,562 6.88 3,065 1,623 6.90 3,121 1,685 6.92 3,176 1,748 6.94 3,232 1,812 6.96 3,287 1,877 6.98 3,343 1,943 7.00 3,398 2,011 7.02 3,455 2,079 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 7.04 3,513 2,149 7.06 3,570 2,220 7.08 3,628 2,292 7.10 3,685 2,365 7.12 3,743 2,439 7.14 3,800 2,514 7.16 3,858 2,591 7.18 3,915 2,669 7.20 3,972 2,748 7.22 4,030 2,828 7.24 4,087 2,909 7.26 4,145 2,991 7.28 4,202 3,075 7.30 4,260 3,159 7.32 4,317 3,245 7.34 4,374 3,332 7.36 4,432 3,420 7.38 4,489 3,509 7.40 4,547 3,599 7.42 4,604 3,691 7.44 4,662 3,784 7.46 4,719 3,877 7.48 4,777 3,972 7.50 4,834 4,069 7.52 4,891 4,166 7.54 4,949 4,264 7.56 5,006 4,364 7.58 5,064 4,464 7.60 5,121 4,566 7.62 5,179 4,669 7.64 5,236 4,773 7.66 5,294 4,879 7.68 5,351 4,985 7.70 5,408 5,093 7.72 5,466 5,201 7.74 5,523 5,311 7.76 5,581 5,422 7.78 5,638 5,535 7.80 5,696 5,648 7.82 5,753 5,762 7.84 5,810 5,878 7.86 5,868 5,995 7.88 5,925 6,113 7.90 5,983 6,232 7.92 6,040 6,352 7.94 6,098 6,473 7.96 6,155 6,596 7.98 6,213 6,720 8.00 6,270 6,845 APPENDIX E: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE  STORMWATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN  INSPECTION REPORT  INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE LOG FORM  LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN  ILLICIT DISCHARGE STATEMENT  SPILL PREVENTION  MANUFACTURER’S INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS STORMWATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN Leefort Terrace Salem, MA RESPONSIBLE PARTY DURING CONSTRUCTION: BC Leefort Terrace LLC 2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 c/o: Beacon Communities Boston, MA 02108 RESPONSIBLE PARTY POST CONSTRUCTION: BC Leefort Terrace LLC 2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 c/o: Beacon Communities Boston, MA 02108 Construction Phase During the construction phase, all erosion control devices and measures shall be maintained in accordance with the final record plans, local/state approvals and conditions, the EPA Construction General Permit and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) if applicable. Additionally, the maintenance of all erosion / siltation control measures during construction shall be the responsibility of the general contractor. Contact information of the OWNER and CONTRACTOR shall be listed in the SWPPP for this site. The SWPPP also includes information regarding construction period allowable and illicit discharges, housekeeping and emergency response procedures. Upon proper notice to the property owner, the City or its authorized designee shall be allowed to enter the property at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner for the purposes of inspection. Post Development Controls Once construction is completed, the post development stormwater controls are to be operated and maintained in compliance with the following permanent procedures (note that the continued implementation of these procedures shall be the responsibility of the Owner or its assignee): 1. Parking lots: Sweep at least two (2) times per year and on a more frequent basis depending on sanding operations. Swept areas shall include all parking, drive aisles, and access aisles. All resulting sweepings shall be collected and properly disposed of offsite in accordance with MADEP and other applicable requirements. Approximate Maintenance Budget: $1,000/year 2. Catch basins, yard drains, trench drains, manholes and piping: Inspect two (2) times per year at the end of foliage and snow-removal seasons. These features shall be cleaned two (2) times per year or whenever the depth of deposits is greater than or equal to one half the depth from the bottom of the invert of the lowest pipe in the catch basin or underground system. Accumulated sediment and hydrocarbons present must be removed and properly disposed of offsite in accordance with MADEP and other applicable requirements. Approximate Maintenance Budget: $500/year per structure. 3. Water Quality Unit (Proprietary Separator): Follow manufacturer’s recommendations (attached). Approximate Maintenance Budget: $1,000/year per unit. 4. Bioretention Areas: shall be inspected and cleared of trashed monthly; mowed 2 to 12 times per year; mulched annually; fertilized annually; dead vegetation removed annually; pruned annually; replace entire media and all vegetation as needed. Any sediment removed shall be disposed of in accordance with MADEP and other applicable requirements. Approximate Maintenance Budget: $2,000/year per area All components of the stormwater system will be accessible by the owner or their assignee. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POST-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT LOCATION: Leefort Terrace Salem, MA RESPONSIBLE PARTY: BC Leefort Terrace LLC 2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 c/o: Beacon Communities Boston, MA 02108 NAME OF INSPECTOR: INSPECTION DATE: Note Condition of the Following (sediment depth, debris, standing water, damage, etc.): Catch Basins: Bioretention Areas: Water Quality Units: Other: Note Recommended Actions to be taken on the Following (sediment and/or debris removal, repairs, etc.): Catch Basins: Bioretention Areas: Water Quality Units: Other: Comments: STORMWATER INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE LOG FORM Leefort Terrace Salem, MA Stormwater Management Practice Responsible Party Date Maintenance Activity Performed LONG-TERM POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Leefort Terrace Salem, MA RESPONSIBLE PARTY DURING CONSTRUCTION: BC Leefort Terrace LLC 2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 c/o: Beacon Communities Boston, MA 02108 RESPONSIBLE PARTY POST CONSTRUCTION: BC Leefort Terrace LLC 2 Center Plaza, Suite 700 c/o: Beacon Communities Boston, MA 02108 For this site, the Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan will consist of the following: · The property owner shall be responsible for “good housekeeping” including proper periodic maintenance of building and pavement areas, curbing, landscaping, etc. · Proper storage and removal of solid waste (dumpsters). · Sweeping of parking lots, drive aisles and access aisles a minimum of twice per year with a commercial cleaning unit. Any sediment removed shall be disposed of in accordance with applicable local and state requirements. · Regular inspections and maintenance of Stormwater Management System as noted in the “O&M Plan”. · Snow removal shall be the responsibility of the property owner. Snow shall not be plowed, dumped and/or placed in forebays, infiltration basins or similar stormwater controls. Salting and/or sanding of pavement / walkway areas during winter conditions shall only be done in accordance with all state/local requirements and approvals. · No outdoor maintenance or washing of vehicles allowed. · Trash and other debris shall be removed from all areas of the site at least twice yearly. · Reseed any bare areas as soon as they occur. Erosion control measures shall be installed in these areas to prevent deposits of sediment from entering the drainage system. · Grass shall be maintained at a minimum blade height of two to three inches and only 1/3 of the plant height shall be removed at a time. Clippings shall not be disposed of within stormwater management areas or adjacent resource areas. · Plants shall be pruned as necessary. · The use of fertilizers will be kept at a level consistent with typical residential use. Fertilizer will be applied a maximum of once to twice per year during the initial planting and stabilization of landscaped areas. Once plants are established and growing well fertilizer will be applied judiciously. · The use of pesticides will be kept at a level consistent with typical residential use. Where possible mechanical methods (i.e. pest traps) or biological methods (i.e. beneficial insects) of pest control shall be implemented. If pesticides (insecticide, herbicide, and fungicide) are required to be used, a pesticide which poses the lowest risk to public health and the environment shall be used. · Pet waste shall be disposed of in accordance with local regulations. Pet waste shall not be disposed of in a storm drain or catch basin. · Snow piles shall be located adjacent to or on pervious surfaces in upland areas. This will allow snow melt water to filter into the soil, leaving behind sand and debris which can be removed in the springtime. · In no case shall snow be disposed of or stored in resource areas (wetlands, floodplain, streams, or other water bodies). · In no case shall snow be disposed of or stored in the detention basins, infiltration basins or bioretention areas. · If necessary, stockpiled snow will be removed from the Site and disposed of at an off-site location in accordance with all local, state and federal regulations. · The amount of sand and deicing chemicals shall be kept at the minimum amount required to provide safe pedestrian and vehicle travel. · Deicing chemicals are recommended as a pretreatment to storm events to minimize the amount of applied sand. · Sand and deicing chemicals should be stockpiled under covered storage facilities that prevent precipitation and adjacent runoff from coming in contact with the deicing materials. Stockpile areas shall be located outside resource areas. · The primary agents used for deicing at parking lots, sidewalks and the access roads shall consist of salt alternatives such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3) or potassium chloride (KCl) or sodium chloride. · Deliveries shall be monitored by owner or owner’s representative to ensure proper delivery and in the event that a spillage occurs it shall be contained and cleaned up immediately in accordance with the spill prevention program for the project. · Recycle materials whenever possible. Provide separate containers for recycle materials. Recycling products will be removed by a certified waste hauler. OPERATON AND MAINTENANCE TRAINING PROGRAM The Owner will coordinate an annual in-house training session to discuss the Operations and Maintenance Plan, the Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan, and the Spill Prevention Plan and response procedures. Annual training will include the following: Discuss the Operations and Maintenance Plan · Explain the general operations of the stormwater management system and its BMPs · Identify potential sources of stormwater pollution and measures / methods of reducing or eliminating that pollution · Emphasize good housekeeping measures Discuss the Spill Prevention and Response Procedures · Explain the process in the event of a spill · Identify potential sources of spills and procedures for cleanup and /or reporting and notification · Complete a yearly inventory or Materials Safety Data sheets of all tenants and confirm that no potentially harmful chemicals are in use. ILLICIT DISCHARGE STATEMENT Certain types of non-stormwater discharges are allowed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Construction General Permit. These types of discharges will be allowed under the conditions that no pollutants will be allowed to come in contact with the water prior to or after its discharge. The control measures which have been outlined previously in this LTPPP will be strictly followed to ensure that no contamination of these non-storm water discharges takes place. Any existing illicit discharges, if discovered during the course of the work, will be reported to MassDEP and the local DPW, as applicable, to be addressed in accordance with their respective policies. No illicit discharges will be allowed in conjunction with the proposed improvements. Duly Acknowledged: Name & Title Date SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROCEDURES (POST CONSTRUCTION) In order to prevent or minimize the potential for a spill of Hazardous Substances or Oil or come into contact with stormwater, the following steps will be implemented: 1. All Hazardous Substances or Oil (such as pesticides, petroleum products, fertilizers, detergents, acids, paints, paint solvents, cleaning solvents, etc.) will be stored in a secure location, with their lids on, preferably under cover, when not in use. 2. The minimum practical quantity of all such materials will be kept on site. 3. A spill control and containment kit (containing, for example, absorbent materials, acid neutralizing powder, brooms, dust pans, mops, rags, gloves, goggles, plastic and metal trash containers, etc.) will be provided on site. 4. Manufacturer's recommended methods for spill cleanup will be clearly posted and site personnel will be trained regarding these procedures and the location of the information and cleanup supplies. 5. It is the OWNER’s responsibility to ensure that all Hazardous Waste on site is disposed of properly by a licensed hazardous material disposal company. The OWNER is responsible for not exceeding Hazardous Waste storage requirements mandated by the EPA or state and local authorities. In the event of a spill of Hazardous Substances or Oil, the following procedures should be followed: 1. All measures should be taken to contain and abate the spill and to prevent the discharge of the Hazardous Substance or Oil to stormwater or off-site. (The spill area should be kept well ventilated and personnel should wear appropriate protective clothing to prevent injury from contact with the Hazardous Substances.) 2. For spills of less than five (5) gallons of material, proceed with source control and containment, clean-up with absorbent materials or other applicable means unless an imminent hazard or other circumstances dictate that the spill should be treated by a professional emergency response contractor. 3. For spills greater than five (5) gallons of material immediately contact the MADEP at the toll-free 24-hour statewide emergency number: 1-888-304-1133, the local fire department (9-1-1) and an approved emergency response contractor. Provide information on the type of material spilled, the location of the spill, the quantity spilled, and the time of the spill to the emergency response contractor or coordinator, and proceed with prevention, containment and/or clean-up if so desired. (Use the form provided, or similar). 4. If there is a Reportable Quantity (RQ) release, then the National Response Center should be notified immediately at (800) 424-8802; within 14 days a report should be submitted to the EPA regional office describing the release, the date and circumstances of the release and the steps taken to prevent another release. This Pollution Prevention Plan should be updated to reflect any such steps or actions taken and measures to prevent the same from reoccurring. SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL AND COUNTERMEASURE FORM Leefort Terrace Salem, MA Where a release containing a hazardous substance occurs, the following steps shall be taken by the facility manager and/or supervisor: 1. Immediately notify The Salem Fire Department (at 9-1-1) 2. All measures must be taken to contain and abate the spill and to prevent the discharge of the pollutant(s) to off-site locations, receiving waters, wetlands and/or resource areas. 3. Notify the Salem Health Department at (978) 741-1800 and the Salem Conservation Commission at (978) 745-9595. 4. Provide documentation from licensed contractor showing disposal and cleanup procedures were completed as well as details on chemicals that were spilled to the Salem Health Department and Conservation Commission. Date of spill: Time: Reported By: Weather Conditions: Material Spilled Location of Spill Approximate Quantity of Spill (in gallons) Agency(s) Notified Date of Notification Cause of Spill: Measures Taken to Clean up Spill: Type of equipment: Make: Size: License or S/N: Location and Method of Disposal Procedures, method, and precautions instituted to prevent a similar occurrence from recurring: Additional Contact Numbers: · DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP) EMERGENCY PHONE: 1-888-304-1133 · NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER PHONE: (800) 424-8802 · U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PHONE: (888) 372-7341 Appendix C 224 Unit Alternative 124 Unit Plan Filed with the ZBA and Conservation Commission 124 Unit Preferred Plan STAIRSTAIR STAIR21'-9 1/2" STAIR 3779 SF LOBBY/LEASING 74 SPACES 47 SPACES 58 SPACES 60 SPACES 224 RESIDENT SPACES + 15 PUBLIC SPACES 24'-0"23'-10 3/8"24'-0" TRASH LOADING STAIRGAS SEWERELECTRI C1" = 60'-0"1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1056 SF 3-BR 550 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR 1046 SF 2-BR 939 SF 2-BR886 SF 2-BR 939 SF 2-BR1046 SF 2-BR 700 SF 1-BR+ 939 SF 2-BR 699 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR 802 SF 2-BR 1038 SF 2-BR 1232 SF 3-BR 886 SF 2-BR 886 SF 2-BR 886 SF 2-BR 1042 SF 2-BR 871 SF 2-BR 699 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR STAIR 1042 SF 2-BR 699 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR 1172 SF 3-BR 1155 SF 3-BR 871 SF 2-BR 625 SF 1-BR1028 SF 3-BR 866 SF 2-BR 619 SF 1-BR 459 SF STUDIO 826 SF 1-BR+ 866 SF 2-BR 27'-0"36'-0"36'-0"991 SF 2-BR 1207 SF 3-BR 36'-0"36'-0"STAIR 619 SF 1-BR 619 SF 1-BR 459 SF STUDIO 1021 SF 2-BR 619 SF 1-BR 697 SF 1-BR 833 SF 2-BR 886 SF 2-BR 1032 SF 2-BR 700 SF 1-BR 34'-0"STAIRSTAIR24'-0" 18'-0" 24'-0"34'-0" 34'-0" MEP AT 2ND FLOOR 699 SF 1-BR 36'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" TRASH 27'-0" 36'-0" STAIR 699 SF 1-BR COURTYARD AT 2ND FLOOR 1" = 60'-0"1 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN 765 SF 1-BR 724 SF 1-BR 699 SF 1-BR 870 SF 2-BR 939 SF 2-BR 939 SF 2-BR1046 SF 2-BR 700 SF 1-BR+ 699 SF 1-BR 834 SF 2-BR 886 SF 2-BR 886 SF 2-BR 942 SF 2-BR 27'-0"36'-0"36'-0"737 SF 1-BR STAIR 619 SF 1-BR 459 SF STUDIO 1021 SF 2-BR 619 SF 1-BR 939 SF 2-BR 1308 SF 2-BR 36'-0"STAIRSTAIR TRASH STAIR ROOF DECK 5374 SF AMENITY 2558 SF AMENITY 1" = 60'-0"1 LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN FRONT PERSPECTIVES BACK PERSPECTIVES LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" 1 A-301 2 A-301 11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"3 A-301 BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"53'-0 5/8"LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6"11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"53'-0 5/8"LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" 1 A-301 2 A-301 11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"3 A-301 BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"53'-0 5/8"LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6"11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"53'-0 5/8"ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/29/2022 5:03:50 PMA-201 BUILDING ELEVATIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC ST MA MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"4 EAST ELEVATION LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6"11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"GARAGE PROGRAM SPACE 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BRCORRIDOR CORRIDOR 1-BR 1-BR FLEX LOUNGE LOBBY CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 53'-0 5/8"BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"1'-0"LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" FOUNDATION 5'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6"11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"5'-6"CORRIDOR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR PROGRAM SPACE GARAGE CORRIDORFLEX LOUNGE VEST ELEV CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR 2-BR QUIET LOUNGE CORRIDOR1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 1-BR 2-BR GARAGE GARAGE STAIR BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"53'-0 5/8"1'-0"LEVEL 1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" LEVEL 3 42'-6" LOBBY LEVEL 13'-0" LEVEL 4 53'-6" ROOF 64'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR OUTLINE OF BUILDING BEYOND 11'-0"11'-0"11'-0"10'-6"8'-0"2'-6"OUTLINE OF BUILDING BEYOND BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 66'-0 5/8"53'-0 5/8"1'-0"ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/29/2022 5:03:51 PMA-301 BUILDING SECTIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC ST MA MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION 1 1/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION 2 1/8" = 1'-0"3 BUILDING SECTION 3 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/29/2022 5:03:57 PMA-901. EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC ST MA MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/29/2022 5:03:57 PMA-902. EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC ST MA MARK DATE DESCRIPTION Appendix D Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Residential Development Lee Fort Terrace Salem,MA Prepared by Vanasse & Associates,Inc. dated March 2022 Prepared by: 35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810 Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Residential Development Lee Fort Terrace Salem, Massachusetts Prepared for: Beacon Communities Boston, Massachusetts March 2022 G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 5 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 5 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................. 7 Geometry ............................................................................................................................. 7 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 8 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ......................................................................................... 9 Public Transportation ........................................................................................................ 10 Safety Analysis .................................................................................................................. 11 Spot Speed Measurements ................................................................................................. 13 FUTURE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 14 Future Traffic Growth ....................................................................................................... 14 General Background Traffic Growth ................................................................................. 14 Specific Development by Others ....................................................................................... 15 Roadway Improvement Projects ........................................................................................ 15 No-Build Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................ 16 Project-Generated Traffic .................................................................................................. 16 Trip Distribution and Assignment ..................................................................................... 17 Future Traffic Volumes - Build Condition ........................................................................ 18 Parking Demand ................................................................................................................ 19 SIGHT DISTANCE EVALUATION ............................................................................................ 20 G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx CONTENTS (Continued) TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 21 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 21 Analysis Results ................................................................................................................ 24 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 27 G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx FIGURES No. Title 1 Site Location Map 2 Existing Intersection Lane Use, Travel Lane Width, and Pedestrian Facilities 3 2022 Existing Weekday Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 4 2029 No-Build Weekday Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 5 Trip Distribution Map 6 Site-Generated Weekday Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 7 2029 Build Weekday Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 8 Sight Distances Evaluation G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx TABLES No. Title 1 Existing Roadway Traffic-Volume Summary 2 Motor Vehicle Crash Data Summary 3 Vehicle Travel Speed Measurements 4 Trip-Generation Summary 5 Trip-Distribution Summary 6 Peak-Hour Traffic-Volume Increases 7 Weekday Peak-Parking Demand 8 Sight Distance Measurements 9 Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections 10 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 11 Signalized Intersection Level-of-Service and Vehicle Queue Summary 12 Unsignalized Intersection Level-of-Service and Vehicle Queue Summary 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Vanasse & Associates, Inc. (VAI) has prepared this Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) in order to evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with a proposed residential development to be located off Fort Avenue in Salem, Massachusetts (the “Project”). This study evaluates the following specific areas as they relate to the Project: i) access requirements; ii) potential off-site improvements; and iii) safety considerations; and identifies and analyzes existing and future traffic conditions, both with and without the Project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Project entails replacing the existing 50-unit elderly housing development to provide a 124-unit multifamily housing development including 65 senior family and 59 multifamily units. The site is situated between Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue and bounded by residential properties to the south, Bentley Academy Innovation School to the east, and open area (city property) to the west. On-site parking will be provided for approximately 100 vehicles (parking ratio of 0.81 parking spaces per unit), including 86 covered spaces at the garage under the building and 14 surface spaces. At present, access to the site is provided via Lee Fort Terrace off Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue. As part of this Project, the site access off Szetela Lane will be eliminated. The site’s existing full-access driveway off of Fort Avenue will be slightly relocated to the east of its current location. The existing elderly housing buildings on-site will be razed to accommodate the Project. EXISTING CONDITIONS In order to establish base traffic-volume conditions within the study area, manual turning movement counts (TMCs) were completed in February 2022. The TMCs were conducted during the weekday morning and evening peak periods, which represent the peak periods for residential use traffic. Due to lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, traffic adjustments were considered. A review of historic traffic data resulted in COVID-specific adjustments to the count data. The observed traffic-volume data was increased by 10 percent during the weekday morning peak hour and 16 percent during the weekday evening peak hour. Although traffic levels have been steadily increasing over the last several months, available traffic data suggests that traffic conditions have not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 2 FUTURE CONDITIONS Traffic volumes within the study area were projected to 2029, which reflects a seven-year planning horizon consistent with State traffic study guidelines. A 1.0 percent per year compounded annual background traffic growth rate was used in order to account for future traffic growth and presently unforeseen development within the study area. Specific Development by Others The City of Salem were contacted in order to determine if there are any planned or approved specific development projects within the area that would have an impact on future traffic volumes at the study intersections. Based on these discussions, the proposed power plant and off-shore wind and Pioneer Village/Camp Naumkeag relocation are the only future projects identified in the immediate area of the Project site. Planned Roadway Improvements The City of Salem was contacted to determine if there are any planned roadway improvements in the area that would have an impact on future traffic operations. Based on these discussions, the following planned roadway improvement projects that would affect the study area were identifi ed: I) sidewalk improvements planned for Webb Street between Derby Street and Fort Avenue; and II) Fort Avenue multi-use pathway project. No-Build Traffic Volumes The 2029 No-Build weekday morning and evening peak-hour traffic-volume networks were developed by applying the 1.0 percent per year compounded annual background traffic growth rate to the 2022 existing condition peak-hour traffic volumes. Site-Generated Traffic Volumes and Directional Distribution The proposed Project is expected to generate approximately 448 new vehicle trips on an average weekday (two-way, 24-hour volume), with 27 new vehicle trips (7 entering and 20 exiting) expected during the weekday morning peak hour and 39 new vehicle trips (23 entering and 16 exiting) expected during the weekday evening peak hour. These projections do not reflect removal of exiting trips. The directional distribution of generated trips to and from the Project site was determined based on a review of journey-to-work data and existing traffic patterns within the study area. In summary, 65 percent of the trips are expected to arrive and depart the site to/from the west, 30 percent of the trips are expected to arrive and depart the site to/from the south, and 5 percent of the trips are expected to arrive and depart the site to/from the north. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS In order to assess the impact of the proposed Project on the roadway network, traffic operations analyses were performed at the study intersections under 2022 Existing, 2029 No-Build, and 2029 Build conditions. The addition of site-related traffic will not result in a significant impact on overall operations at the study area intersections. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 3 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations have been developed as a part of this evaluation and, where applicable, will be completed in conjunction with the Project subject to receipt of all necessary rights, permits, and approvals. Project Access Access and egress to the proposed residential is proposed by one full-access driveway off of Fort Avenue. The following recommendations are offered with respect to Project access, internal circulation, and parking, many of which are already reflected on the Site Plans for the Project: • The Project site driveways and internal circulating drives should be a minimum of 22 feet in width where two-way traffic is to be conveyed and designed to accommodate the turning and maneuvering requirements of the largest anticipated responding emergency vehicle as defined by the Salem Fire Department. • Vehicles exiting the Project and site internal intersections site should be placed under STOP-sign control with a marked STOP-line provided. • At the Fort Avenue site driveway, the existing school fence be set back sufficiently from the edge of the roadways (approximately 6 feet) so as not to inhibit the available sightlines. It is also recommended that a “NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER” sign be installed to prohibit vehicles parking between site driveway and school crosswalk. Vehicles parked within this location would block sight lines from vehicles exiting from the proposed site driveway • All signs and pavement markings to be installed within the Project site should conform to the applicable standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).1 • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant wheelchair ramps should be provided at all pedestrian crossings internal to the Project site and for crossing the Project site driveways. • Signs and landscaping to be installed as a part of the Project within intersection sight triangle areas of the Project site driveways should be designed and maintained so as not to restrict lines of sight. • Snow windrows within the sight triangle areas of the Project site driveway should be promptly removed where such accumulations would impede sight lines. • A school bus waiting area should be provided at an appropriate location defined in consultation with the Salem Public Schools. 1Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); Federal Highway Administration; Washington, D.C.; 2009. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 4 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan As is the case with residential developments, a major focus of the traffic mitigation plan focuses on the reduction of single-occupant vehicles (SOVs) arriving and departing to and from the site. This is predominantly accomplished by developing a comprehensive TDM strategy. In consultation with the City, the proponent is committed to supporting a balanced multimodal transportation plan to serve the residents and visitors of the site. In an effort to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation to SOVs, the following TDM measures will be implemented as a part of the Project: • A transportation coordinator will be designated for the Project to coordinate the elements of the TDM program. • Information regarding public transportation services, maps, schedules, and fare information will be posted in a central location and/or otherwise made available to residents. • A “welcome packet” will be provided to residents detailing available public transportation services, bicycle and walking alternatives, and available commuter options. • Pedestrian accommodations will be incorporated into the Project and consist of sidewalks and ADA-compliant wheelchair ramps at all pedestrian crossings internal to the Project site that will link building entrances to the sidewalk infrastructure along Fort Avenue and Szetela Lane. • Secure bicycle parking will be provided within the Project site consisting of both exterior and interior (covered) bicycle parking. • Work-at-home workspaces will be provided to support telecommuting by residents of the Project. • Consideration should be given to installing accommodations for the charging of electric vehicles by residents of the Project. • On site parking demand should be periodically reviewed by the transportation coordinator. With implementation of the above recommendations, safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access will be provided to the Project site and the Project can be accommodated within the confines of the existing transportation system. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Project will not result in a significant impact on overall operations. With the implementation of the above recommendations, safe and efficient access will be provided to the planned development and the proposed development can be constructed with minimal impact to the area. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 5 INTRODUCTION Vanasse & Associates, Inc. (VAI) has prepared this Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) in order to evaluate potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed residential development to be located off Fort Avenue in Salem, Massachusetts (the “Project”). This study evaluates the following specific areas as they relate to the Project: i) access requirements; ii) potential off-site improvements; and iii) safety considerations; and identifies and analyzes existing and future traffic conditions, both with and without the Project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Project entails replacing the existing 50-unit elderly housing to provide a 124-unit multifamily housing development including 65 senior family and 59 multifamily units. The site is situated between Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue and bounded by residential properties to the south, Bentley Academy Innovation School to the east, and open area (city property) to the west. On-site parking will be provided for approximately 100 vehicles (parking ratio of 0.81 parking spaces per unit), including 86 covered spaces at the garage under the building and 14 surface spaces. At present, access to the site is provided via Lee Fort Terrace off Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue. As part of this Project, the site access off Szetela Lane will be eliminated. The site’s existing full- access driveway off of Fort Avenue will be slightly relocated to the east of the current location. The existing elderly housing buildings on-site will be razed to accommodate the Project. STUDY METHODOLOGY This study was prepared in consultation with the City of Salem and in accordance with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Guidelines for Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) Guideline; and the standards of the Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning professions for the preparation of such reports; and was conducted in three distinct stages. The first stage involved an assessment of existing conditions in the study area and included an inventory of roadway geometrics; pedestrian facilities; observations of traffic flow; review of safety characteristics along area roadways; and collection of daily and peak-period traffic counts. In the second stage of the study, future traffic conditions were projected and analyzed. Specific travel demand forecasts for the Project were assessed along with future traffic demands due to 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 6 expected traffic growth independent of the Project. A seven-year time horizon was selected for analyses consistent with State guidelines for the preparation of TIAs. The traffic analysis conducted in stage two identifies existing or projected future roadway capacity, traffic safety, and site access issues. The third stage of the study presents and evaluates measures to address traffic and safety issues, if any, identified in stage two of the study. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS A comprehensive field inventory of traffic conditions on the study area roadways was conducted in February 2022. The field investigation consisted of an inventory of existing roadway geometrics, pedestrian facilities, traffic volumes, and operating characteristics, as well as posted speed limits and land use information for the roadways that provide access to the Project including Fort Avenue and Essex Street as well as the intersections which are expected to accommodate the majority of Project-related traffic. The study area for the Project is listed below and graphically depicted in Figure 1. 1. Lee Fort Terrace (proposed site driveway) at Fort Avenue 2. Lee Fort Terrace at Szetela Lane 3. Szetela Lane at site parking lot 4. Webb Street at Essex Street and Szetela Lane 5. Webb Street at Fort Avenue The following describes the study area roadway and intersections: GEOMETRY Roadways Fort Avenue Fort Avenue is a two-lane urban collector roadway under City jurisdiction in a general east-west direction. Within the study area, Fort Avenue generally provides two 12-foot wide travel lanes separated by a double-yellow centerline with no marked shoulders. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the street within the study area. Illumination is provided by way of streetlights mounted on wood poles. The posted speed limit along Fort Avenue is 25 to 30 miles per hour (mph). Land use within the study area consists of commercial and residential properties. Szetela Lane Szetela Lane is a two-lane local roadway under City jurisdiction in a general northeast-southwest direction between Memorial Drive and Webb Street. Within the study area, Szetela Lane generally provides two 14-foot wide travel lanes separated by a double-yellow centerline with no marked Legend:Signalized Study IntersectionUnsignalized Study IntersectionUSSALEMSZETELA LANEME M O R I A L D R I V E VICTORY ROADFORT AVENUEWEBB STREETESSE X S T R E E T STREETDERB Y SUUULEE FORTTERRACESITE1542U3Site Location MapTransportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, MassachusettsFigure 1Source: Google Earth.N1502500Scale in FeetVanasse &Associates incR:\8703\2022\8703slm.dwg, 3/4/2022 12:10:41 PM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 8 shoulders. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway within the study area, with illumination provided by way of streetlights mounted on wood poles. The posted speed limit along Szetela Lane is 25 to 30 mph. Land use within the study area consists mostly of residential properties and a school. Intersections Figure 2 summarizes existing lane use and travel lane widths at the study area intersections as observed in February 2022. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES In order to establish base traffic-volume conditions within the study area, manual turning movement counts (TMCs) was completed on Tuesday February 1, 2022. The TMCs were conducted during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak periods, which represent the peak periods for residential use traffic. Traffic Adjustment In order to develop 2022 Existing traffic-volume conditions, the data collected required adjustments due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this, historic traffic count data conducted in June 20182 in the same study area and traffic volumes from MassDOT permanent count station IDs 580 and 595 were evaluated. Traffic-volume data collected during the weekday evening in 2018 at the intersection of Hawthorn Boulevard, Congress Street, and Derby Street was compared to February 2022 traffic volumes that were collected at the same location. Traffic-volume data from the Tuesday, February 1, 2022 continuous count stations was compared to the Tuesday, February 5, 2019 traffic volumes that were collected at the same location. Both 2018 and 2019 traffic-volume data were expanded to 2022 (same-year condition) by applying a background traffic growth rate of 1 percent per year (discussion follows) in order to allow for a comparison of the data. Based on this pre- and post-COVID-19 traffic data comparison, the 2022 existing condition volumes was adjusted upward by an additional 10 percent during the weekday morning peak hour and 16 percent during the weekday evening peak hour, in order to account for the reduced traffic volumes, which is an approach consistent with the phased “Reopening Massachusetts” plan provided by MassDOT. Although traffic levels have been steadily increasing over the last several months, available traffic data suggests that traffic conditions have not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels. Seasonal Adjustment In addition to correction factors for COVID-19, adjustments should be made to account for seasonal fluctuations in traffic. The MassDOT permanent count station ID 5080 was used to evaluate the traffic volumes for seasonal fluctuations. Based on this data, it was determined that February traffic volumes are approximately 15 percent below average-month conditions for this station. Therefore, the February traffic volumes were increased by an additional 15 percent in order to provide a conservative analysis condition. 2Transportation Impact Assessment – Proposed Retail Marijuana Dispensary – Salem, Massachusetts; VAI; August 2018. Not To Scale Figure 2N Vanasse & Associates inc Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts SITE Legend: Signalized Intersection Sidewalk S Unsignalized IntersectionU Crosswalk Lane Use and Travel LaneWidth Salem Harbor Connector Path Channelized Right-turn Existing Lane Use, Travel Lane Width, and Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalk Width S U U U U YIELD R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/4/2022 12:12:40 PM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 9 The 2022 Existing traffic volumes are summarized in Table 1, with the weekday morning and evening peak-hour traffic volumes graphically depicted on Figure 3. It is important to note that the peak-hour traffic volumes presented in Table 1 were obtained from the TMCs with appropriate COVID and Seasonal adjustment and are reflected on the aforementioned figure. Table 1 EXISTING ROADWAY TRAFFIC-VOLUME SUMMARY Weekday Morning Peak Hour (7:15 to 8:15 AM) Weekday Afternoon Peak Hour (4:15 to 5:15 PM) Location Daily Volume (vpd)a Volume (vph)b Percent of Daily Trafficc Predominant Flow Volume (vph) Percent of Daily Traffic Predominant Flow Szetela Lane, west of Lee Fort Terrace 5,700 459 8.0 52% EB 140 2.5 69%WB Fort Avenue, west of Lee Fort Terrace 3,015 244 8.1 64% WB 238 8.0 59% WB aTwo-way daily traffic expressed in vehicles per day; (estimated). bManual turning movement counts conducted in February 2022 (adjusted). cThe percent of daily traffic that occurs during the peak hour. WB= westbound. As can be seen in Table 1, Szetela Lane, west of Lee Fort Terrace was found to accommodate approximately 5,700 vehicles on an average weekday (24-hour, two-way volume), with approximately 459 vehicles per hour (vph) during the weekday morning peak hour and 140 vph during the weekday evening peak hour. Fort Avenue, west of Lee Fort Terrace was found to accommodate approximately 3,015 vehicles on an average weekday (24-hour, two-way volume), with approximately 244 vehicles per hour (vph) during the weekday morning peak hour and 241 vph during the weekday evening peak hour. The predominant flow on Fort Avenue during the weekday morning and evening peak hour is in the westbound direction. A review of the peak-period traffic counts indicates that the weekday morning peak hour generally occurs between 7:15 and 8:15 AM with the weekday evening peak hour generally occurring between 4:15 and 5:15 PM. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES A comprehensive field inventory of pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the study area was undertaken in February 2022. The field inventory consisted of a review of the location of sidewalks and pedestrian crossing locations along the study area roadways and at the study area intersections. As detailed on Figure 2, sidewalks exist on both sides of the study area roadways and intersections. Within the study area, painted crosswalks are provided at major intersections including Webb Street at Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue, Webb Street at Fort Avenue, and for crossing Szetela Lane and Fort Avenue at Lee Fort Terrace. Bicycle-friendly roads and trails are provided in the vicinity of the Project site. Although shared lane markings are not painted on Fort Avenue in the vicinity of the Project site, this roadway provides sufficient width to support bicycle travel in a shared traveled- way configuration. Not To Scale Figure 3 2022 Existing Conditions N WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR (4:15 - 5:15 PM) WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR (7:15-8:15 AM) Peak Hour Traffic VolumesVanasse & Associates inc Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts SITE SITE R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/9/2022 11:53:14 AM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 10 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Public transportation services are provided within the study area by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) for commuter rail and bus services. Within the study area, the MBTA operates the following bus services with a bus stop located less than a ten-minute walk from the site. Sidewalks and crosswalks exist throughout the route. Within the study area, the MBTA operates the following services: Winter Street intersection Washington Street (0.4 miles west/north of the site) • Fixed-bus Route 451 - Salem Depot - via Cabot Street or Tozer Road Congress Street intersection Derby Street (0.6 miles west of the site) • Fixed-bus Route 455 - Salem Depot - Wonderland via Central Square, Lynn Salem Station (0.7 miles west/north of the site) • Newburyport-Rockport line commuter rail station • Fixed-bus Route 435 - Liberty Tree Mall - Central Square, Lynn via Peabody Square • Fixed-bus Route 450 - Salem Depot - Wonderland or Haymarket Station • Fixed-bus Route 451 - North Beverly Station - Salem Depot • Fixed-bus Route 455 - Salem Depot - Wonderland Station • Fixed-bus Route 456 - Salem Depot - Central Square, Lynn MBTA fixed-route bus roundtrip fares are $1.70 with a Charlie Card for adults and $0.85 for students with valid ID, senior citizens (65 years of age or older), and people who are legally blind. MBTA commuter rail fares for adults are $2.40 to $13.25 (price based on distance traveled) one- way and $10.00 for a weekend pass. All MBTA trains and buses are handicapped and wheelchair accessible. Schedule and fare information for the MBTA fixed-route bus and commuter rail service are provided in the Appendix. Boston Harbor Cruises operates ferry service between the Salem Ferry Center and Long Wharf in Boston. The ferry is seasonal and operates between May 17 and October 8. The City of Salem also provides a rideshare service (SKIPPER) servicing the entire city. The service operates Monday through Thursday from 7:00 AM to 12:00 AM, Friday from 7:00 AM to 1:00 AM, Saturday from 10:00 AM to 1:00 AM, and Sunday from 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Rides before 7:00 PM cost $2, while rides after 7:00 PM cost $3 ($1 for senior citizens, middle school and high school students, and people with disabilities). The service allows a maximum of two passengers per service request with a charge of $1 extra per additional passenger. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 11 SAFETY ANALYSIS In order to evaluate whether there are any notable trends that would indicate potential safety deficiencies within the study area, a motor vehicle accident analysis was conducted in accordance with State guidelines as described below. Vehicle Accident Data Motor vehicle accident data was acquired from the MassDOT Safety Management/Traffic Operations Unit for the most recent five-year period available (2015 through 2019) in order to examine motor vehicle accident trends occurring within the study area. The data is summarized by intersection, type, and severity, and is presented in Table 2. As summarized in Table 2, the intersections of Webb Street at Essex Street/Szetela Lane experienced the highest frequency of accidents in the study area with a total of 12 accidents over the five-year review period, averaging 2.4 accidents per year. The majority of the accidents at this intersection were angle-type collisions (9 out of 12), during the daylight (8 out of 12), and caused property damage only (7 out of 12). All study intersections were found to have a motor vehicle crash rate below the MassDOT average for the District in which the Project is located (District 4). No fatalities were reported at any of the study area intersections over the five-year period reviewed. In addition, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) database was reviewed and none of the study area intersections are listed as HSIP-eligible clusters in the most recent (2017 through 2019) HSIP cluster listing. The detailed MassDOT Crash Rate Worksheets are provided in the Appendix. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 12 Table 2 MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH DATA SUMMARYa Fort Avenue/ Lee Fort Terrace Szetela Lane/ Lee Fort Terrace Webb Street/ Essex Street/ Szetela Lane Webb Street/ Fort Avenue Traffic Control Type:b Year: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total U 1 0 0 1 0 2 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 TS 3 0 4 4 1 12 U 1 0 1 2 0 4 Average Ratec MassDOT Crash Rate:d Significant?e 0.4 0.35 0.57 No 0 0 0.57 No 2.40 0.55 0.73 No 0.8 0.40 0.57 No Type: Angle Rear-End Sideswipe Single Vehicle Crash Unknown/Other Total 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 0 0 12 1 0 3 0 0 4 Conditions: Clear Cloudy Rain Snow/Ice Total 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 1 12 4 0 0 0 4 Lighting: Daylight Dawn/Dusk Dark (Road Lit) Dark (Road Unlit) Total 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 1 0 12 2 0 2 0 4 Day of Week: Monday through Friday Saturday Sunday Total 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 12 3 0 1 4 Severity: Property Damage Only Non-fatal Injury Total 2 0 2 0 0 0 7 5 12 3 1 4 aSource: MassDOT Safety Management/Traffic Operations Unit records, 2015 through 2019. bTraffic Control Type: U = unsignalized; TS = traffic signal. cCrash rate per million vehicles entering the intersection. dDistrict crash rate. eThe intersection crash rate is significant if it is found to exceed the MassDOT crash rate for the MassDOT Highway Division District in which the Project is located (District 4). 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 13 SPOT SPEED MEASUREMENTS Vehicle travel speed measurements were performed along Fort Avenue in the vicinity of the Project site. Table 3 summarizes the vehicle travel speed measurements. Table 3 VEHICLE TRAVEL SPEED MEASUREMENTS Fort Avenue Westbound Fort Avenue Eastbound Mean Travel Speed (mph) 28 29 85th Percentile Speed (mph) 31 32 Posted Speed Limit (mph) 25 25 mph = miles per hour. As can be seen in Table 3, the mean (average) vehicle travel speed along Fort Avenue in the vicinity of the Project site, was found to be approximately 28 mph in the westbound direction and 29 mph in the eastbound direction. The measured 85th percentile vehicle travel speed, or the speed at which 85 percent of the observed vehicles traveled above, was found to be approximately 31 mph in the westbound and approximately 32 mph eastbound direction. The 85th percentile speed of vehicles traveling in the westbound and eastbound direction was found to be 6 and 7 mph, respectively, above the posted speed limit (25 mph) along Fort Avenue. Overall, the speed study indicates speed of travel for vehicles traveling in each direction slightly above the 25 mph posted speed limit. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 14 FUTURE CONDITIONS Traffic volumes in the study area were projected to the year 2029, which reflects a seven-year planning horizon consistent with State Traffic Study Guidelines. Independent of the Project, traffic volumes on the roadway network in the year 2029 under No-Build conditions include all existing traffic and new traffic resulting from background traffic growth. Anticipated Project-generated traffic volumes superimposed upon this 2029 No-Build traffic network reflect the 2029 Build conditions with the Project. FUTURE TRAFFIC GROWTH Future traffic growth is a function of the expected land development in the immediate area and the surrounding region. Several methods can be used to estimate this growth. A procedure frequently employed estimates an annual percentage increase in traffic growth and applies that percentage to all traffic volumes under study. The drawback to such a procedure is that some turning volumes may actually grow at either a higher or a lower rate at particular intersections. An alternative procedure identifies the location and type of planned development, estimates the traffic to be generated, and assigns it to the area roadway network. This procedure produces a more realistic estimate of growth for local traffic. However, the drawback of this procedure is that the potential growth in population and development external to the study area would not be accounted for in the traffic projections. To provide a conservative analysis framework, both procedures were used, the salient components of which are described below. GENERAL BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH In order to determine general background traffic growth trends within the study area, MassDOT historical annual traffic growth rates were reviewed. Based on this data, it was determined that traffic volumes from 2015 to 2019 have fluctuated over the past several years. In order to provide a prudent planning condition for the Project and to be consistent with previous traffic studies in the area, a 1 percent per year compounded annual background traffic growth rate was used in order to account for future traffic growth and presently unforeseen development within the study area. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 15 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT BY OTHERS The City of Salem was contacted in order to determine if there are any planned or approved development projects that are expected to influence future traffic volumes within the study area . Based on these discussions, the following projects were identified for inclusion in this assessment: • Power Plant and Offshore Wind - The proposed power plant and offshore wind marshalling yard will be located at the Salem Harbor Footprint property just south/east of our Project site. It is expected that the power plant and offshore wind project proponent will begin the permitting process with Salem in the fall of 2022. According to City staff, while there will be an increase in traffic to and from the power plant and offshore wind construction, it will be limited only to that narrow time period (between the second quarter of 2023 and the first quarter of 2025). Once construction at the site is finished and normal operations begin, there will not be a significant amount of traffic added as the vast majority of materials will be delivered by sea via barges or other vessels. That being said, the 1.0 percent general background growth rate was assumed to account for the new trips generated by this project. • Pioneer Village/Camp Naumkeag Relocation - This project entails relocation of the existing Pioneer Village located at West Avenue to Memorial Drive just north of our Project site. This project is delayed while the Camp Naumkeag property is in its demolition delay period. The Pioneer Village typically operated on Saturdays and Sundays from 12:00 PM to 4:00 PM, June through October. It is expected that the operating hours will remain the same as in its previous location. The proposed museum is expected to operate during the weekends and will have a minimal impact in the area. No other developments were identified at this time that are expected to result in an increase in traffic within the study area beyond the general background traffic growth rate. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS The City of Salem was contacted to determine if there are any planned roadway improvements in the area that would have an impact on future traffic operations . Based on these discussions, it was found the following projects: • Sidewalk Improvements planned for Webb Street between Derby Street and Fort Avenue - This project entails improvements of the road and sidewalks along Webb Street between Derby and Fort Ave. This project is still in the planning stage with future construction expected. • Fort Avenue and Columbus Avenue Traffic Calming - At present, this project includes installation of striping and a mix of flex posts and zebra armadillo separators. The City staff has been working with neighbors and a traffic engineering firm to design traffic calming, bike facilities, and pedestrian amenities that include the extension of a bike route through the intersection at Columbus Avenue. Long-term goal includes converting the paint, posts, armadillo-separated bike lanes to a fully curb separated multiuse path and extend to Salem Willows. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 16 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES The 2029 No-Build peak-hour traffic-volume networks were developed by applying the 1 percent per year compounded annual background traffic growth rate to the 2022 Existing peak-hour traffic volumes. The resulting 2029 No-Build weekday morning and weekday evening peak-hour traffic- volume networks are shown on Figure 4. PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC As proposed, the Project will entail the construction of a 124-unit residential development. In order to develop the traffic characteristics of this proposal, trip-generation statistics published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)3 for Land Use Code (LUC) 221, Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)- Not Close to Rail Transit and LUC 252, Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily were used to develop the traffic characteristics of the proposal. Trip-generation calculations were performed for a typical weekday, as well as the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours, the critical time periods for Project-related traffic activity. Transit Usage Given the availability of public transportation services in City of Salem (MBTA fixed -route bus service, and commuter rail service) and close proximity of the Project site to Downtown with the interconnected network of sidewalks, it is expected that a portion of the residents of the Project will use public transportation services, walk, and bike, thereby reducing the volume of traffic that may be associated with the Project. In order to determine the proportion of residents of the Project that may use public transportation as their primary mode of transportation, travel mode data obtained from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) for census tract 2044 -Essex County, Massachusetts where the site is located. Based on a review of this data, the following commuting modes were identified for workers aged 16 or older that reside within the City: • Single-Occupant Vehicle: 64.5% • Car/Vanpool/Taxi: 8.0% • Public Transportation: 13.3% • Walk: 8.9% • Bicycle/Other Means: 0.5% • Worked at Home: 4.8% According to the ACS, approximately 35 percent of workers that reside in the Census Tract reported that they used an alternative mode of transportation to SOVs to travel to/from work, with approximately 8.0 percent participating in a car or vanpool, 13.3 percent using public transportation, 8.9 percent walking/bicycling and approximately 4.8 percent indicating that they work from home. In order to provide a conservative analysis from which to assess the potential impact of the Project on the transportation infrastructure, a reduction to the ITE-based trip- generation calculations was not applied to account for transit use or the use of alternative modes of transportation to SOVs. A summary of the expected vehicle trip generation for the Project is summarized in Table 4. 3Trip Generation, 11th Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers; Washington, DC; 20 21. Not To Scale Figure 4 2029 No-Build Conditions N WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR (4:15 - 5:15 PM) WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR (7:15-8:15 AM) Peak Hour Traffic VolumesVanasse & Associates inc Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts SITE SITE R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/9/2022 11:53:24 AM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 17 Table 4 TRIP-GENERATION SUMMARY Time Period/ Directional Distribution Proposed Senior Family (65-units)a Proposed Multifamily (59-units)b Total Trips (124-units) Weekday Daily: Entering Exiting Total 106 106 212 118 118 236 224 224 448 Weekday Morning Peak Hour: Entering Exiting Total 4 9 13 3 11 14 7 20 27 Weekday Evening Peak Hour: Entering Exiting Total 9 7 16 14 9 23 23 16 39 aBased on ITE LUC 252, Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily. bBased on ITE LUC 221, Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) – Not Close to Rail Transit. As shown in Table 4, the proposed Project is expected to generate approximately 448 new vehicle trips on an average weekday (two-way, 24-hour volume), with 27 new vehicle trips (7 entering and 20 exiting) expected during the weekday morning peak hour and 39 new vehicle trips (23 entering and 16 exiting) expected during the weekday evening peak hour. These projections do not include removal of existing trips. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The directional distribution of the site-generated trips to and from the proposed development was determined based on a review of the Journey-to-Work data obtained from the United States Census Bureau4 and existing travel patterns. Trip distribution for the proposal is summarized in Table 5 and graphically depicted on Figure 5. The weekday morning and weekday evening peak-hour traffic volumes expected to be generated by the residential development were assigned on the study area roadway network as shown on Figure 6. 4Table 3. Residence MCD/County to Workplace MCD/County Commuting Flows for the United States and Puerto Rico Sorted by Residence Geography: 5‐Year ACS, 2011‐2015. Not To Scale Figure 5 Trip Distribution Map N Vanasse & Associates inc Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts SITE 65%5% 30%R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/9/2022 11:53:34 AM Not To Scale Figure 6 Site-Generated N WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR Peak Hour Traffic Volumes SITE Vanasse & Associates inc SITE Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/16/2022 2:52:34 PM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 18 Table 5 TRIP-DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY Roadway Direction (To/From) Entering (To/From) Webb Street Essex Street Fort Avenue West South North 65 30 5 TOTAL 100 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES - BUILD CONDITION The 2029 Build condition networks consist of the 2029 No-Build traffic volumes, plus the proposed new 124-unit housing site-generated traffic added to them minus the trips that are currently generated by the Project site. The 2029 Build weekday morning and weekday evening peak-hour traffic-volume networks are graphically depicted on Figure 7. A summary of peak-hour projected traffic-volume increases external to the study area that is the subject of this assessment is shown in Table 6. These volumes are based on the expected increases from the Project. Table 6 PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC-VOLUME INCREASESa Location/Peak Hour 2029 No Build 2029 Build Traffic-Volume Increase Over No-Buildb Percent Increase Over No-Build Webb Street, west of Essex Street and Szetela Lane: Weekday Morning Weekday Evening 669 618 675 637 5 19 0.7 3.1 Essex Street, south of Webb Street: Weekday Morning Weekday Evening 422 305 426 315 4 10 0.9 3.3 Webb Street, east of Fort Avenue: Weekday Morning Weekday Evening 201 192 201 192 0 0 0.0 0.0 Fort Avenue, north of Site Driveway: Weekday Morning Weekday Evening 261 255 255 257 -6 2 -2.3 0.8 aVehicles per hour, total of both directions. b Reflects Removal of the existing trips. As shown in Table 6, in comparison to future No-Build conditions, Project-related traffic increases are projected to range between -6 to 19 vehicles during peak hours, with traffic percent increases ranging -2.3 to 3.3 percent. Not To Scale Figure 7 2029 Build Conditions N WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR Peak Hour Traffic VolumesVanasse & Associates inc Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts SITE SITE R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/16/2022 2:52:59 PM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 19 PARKING DEMAND A parking demand analysis was performed to evaluate whether the proposed parking supply will be adequate to accommodate the anticipated parking demand for the Project. In order to identify the parking demand for this Project, parking demand calculations were performed based on data published by the ITE. The ITE provides parking generation equations for a number of land use codes as part of their Parking Generation manual5 including LUC 221, Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) - Not Close to Rail Transit and LUC 252, Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily. Table 7 summarizes the ITE parking demand data for the residential development. Table 7 WEEKDAY PEAK-PARKING DEMAND Peak-Period Parking Demand Per Units Period Proposed Senior Family (65-units)a Proposed Multifamily (59-units)b Total Number of Required Parking spaces Proposed Parking Supply Weekday (Monday - Friday) 40 44 88 100 aBased on ITE LUC 252, Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily. bBased on ITE LUC 221, Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) – Not Close to Rail Transit. As can be seen in Table 7, the ITE indicates the peak-parking demand for this Project is 88 parking spaces, which is below the proposed supply of 100 parking spaces. The proposed parking supply corresponds to a parking ratio of 0.81 parking spaces per unit. This ratio falls within the ITE range rates for this use. It can be concluded that the proposed parking supply is higher than the estimated peak demand and sufficient parking spaces will be provided at this facility. It is important to note that a survey conducted in the existing elderly housing development, located at the project site, shows that approximately 50 percent of the household own at least one vehicle. 5Parking Demand, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., 2019. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 20 SIGHT DISTANCE EVALUATION Sight distance measurements were performed at the driveways intersection with Fort Avenue in accordance with MassDOT and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)6 requirements. In brief, Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) is the distance required by a vehicle traveling at the design speed of a roadway, on wet pavement, to stop prior to striking an object in its travel path. In accordance with AASHTO and MassDOT standards, at a minimum, sufficient stopping sight distances must be provided at an intersection. Table 8 presents the measured sight distances at the site driveway. Table 8 SIGHT DISTANCE MEASUREMENTSa Intersection/Sight Distance Measurement Distance (Feet) Required for Posted Speed (25 mph) Required for 85th Percentile Speed (35 mph) Measured Fort Avenue at Site Drive Fort Avenue approaching from the east Fort Avenue approaching from the west 155 155 250 250 83 (250)b 344 aRecommended minimum values obtained from A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 7th Edition; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO); 2018. bValue in parentheses is the available dimension if the existing school fence be relocated. As can be seen in Table 8, the sight distance at the site drive intersection with Fort Avenue was found to exceed the recommended minimum for SSDs in both directions, based on the posted speed limit of 25 mph and 85th percentile vehicle travel speed of 31 and 32 mph. Due to the existing fence on the school property, the proposed site driveway did not meet the minimum required (looking east). If the existing fence is set back approximately 6 feet, the proposed driveway lines of sight can be improved and provide more than 250 feet, which is the required sight distance for a 35-mph approach speed. A sight distance plan showing the sight triangle areas at the Project site roadway and the location of the recommended fence relocation is depicted on Figure 8. 6A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, 7th Edition; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO); Washington D.C.; 2018. Proposed Site Driveway14.5 It is recommendation that schoolfence be set back approximately6ft such that adequate sight linesbe maintained.SSD 35 mph 250'It is recommendation that "No Parking Hereto Corner" sign be installed so that theproposed site driveway can operate in a safemanner.FORT AVENUEBENTLEYACADEMYINNOVATIONSCHOOLDERBY STREETSight Distance EvaluationTransportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, MassachusettsFigure 8Source: Google Earth and AASHTO.N25500Scale in FeetVanasse &Associates incR:\8703\2022\8703SSD.dwg, 3/7/2022 5:48:58 PM 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 21 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Measuring existing and future traffic volumes quantifies traffic flow within the study area. To assess quality of flow, roadway capacity and vehicle queue analyses were conducted under Existing, No-Build, and Build traffic-volume conditions. Capacity analyses provide an indication of how well the roadway facilities serve the traffic demands placed upon them, with vehicle queue analyses providing a secondary measure of the operational characteristics of an intersection or section of roadway under study. METHODOLOGY Levels of Service A primary result of capacity analyses is the assignment of level-of-service to traffic facilities under various traffic-flow conditions.7 The concept of level-of-service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and/or passengers. A level-of-service definition provides an index to quality of traffic flow in terms of such factors as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility. They are given letter designations from A to F, with level-of-service (LOS) A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F representing congested or constrained operating conditions. Since the level-of-service of a traffic facility is a function of the traffic flows placed upon it, such a facility may operate at a wide range of levels of service, depending on the time of day, day of week, or period of year. 7The capacity analysis methodology is based on the concepts and procedures presented in the Highway Capacity Manual; Transportation Research Board; Washington, DC; 2010. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 22 Signalized Intersections The six levels of service for signalized intersections may be described as follows: • LOS A describes operations with very low control delay; most vehicles do not stop at all. • LOS B describes operations with relatively low control delay. However, more vehicles stop than LOS A. • LOS C describes operations with higher control delays. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. • LOS D describes operations with control delay in the range where the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Many vehicles stop, and individual cycle failures are noticeable. • LOS E describes operations with high control delay values. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. • LOS F describes operations with high control delay values that often occur with over- saturation. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Levels of service for signalized intersections were calculated using the Percentile Delay Method implemented as a part of the Synchro™ 11 software as required by MassDOT. The Percentile Delay Method assesses the effects of signal type, timing, phasing, and progression; vehicle mix; and geometrics on “percentile” delay. Level-of-service designations are based on the criterion of percentile delay per vehicle and are a measure of: i) driver discomfort; ii) motorist frustration; and iii) fuel consumption; and includes a uniform delay based on percentile volumes using a Poisson arrival pattern, an initial queue move-up time, and a queue interaction delay that accounts for delays resulting from queues extending from adjacent intersections. Table 9 summarizes the relationship between level-of-service and percentile delay and uses the same numerical delay thresholds as the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual8 method. The tabulated percentile delay criterion may be applied in assigning level-of-service designations to individual lane groups, to individual intersection approaches, or to entire intersections. Table 9 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Percentile Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) A B C D E F <10.0 10.1 to 20.0 20.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 55.0 55.1 to 80.0 >80.0 8Highway Capacity Manual; Transportation Research Board; Washington, DC; 2000. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 23 Unsignalized Intersections The six levels of service for unsignalized intersections may be described as follows: • LOS A represents a condition with little or no control delay to minor street traffic. • LOS B represents a condition with short control delays to minor street traffic. • LOS C represents a condition with average control delays to minor street traffic. • LOS D represents a condition with long control delays to minor street traffic. • LOS E represents operating conditions at or near capacity level, with very long control delays to minor street traffic. • LOS F represents a condition where minor street demand volume exceeds capacity of an approach lane, with extreme control delays resulting. The levels of service of unsignalized intersections are determined by application of a procedure described in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual.9 Level of service is measured in terms of average control delay. Mathematically, control delay is a function of the capacity and degree of saturation of the lane group and/or approach under study and is a quantification of motorist delay associated with traffic control devices such as traffic signals and STOP signs. Control delay includes the effects of initial deceleration delay approaching a STOP sign, stopped delay, queue move-up time, and final acceleration delay from a stopped condition. Definitions for level of service at unsignalized intersections are also given in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. Table 10 summarizes the relationship between level of service and average control delay for two-way STOP- controlled and all-way STOP-controlled intersections. Table 10 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONSa Level-of-Service by Volume-to-Capacity Ratio Average Control Delay (Seconds Per Vehicle) v/c ≤ 1.0 v/c > 1.0 A B C D E F F F F F F F ≤10.0 10.1 to 15.0 15.1 to 25.0 25.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 50.0 >50.0 aSource: Highway Capacity Manual; Transportation Research Board; Washington, DC; 2010; page 19-2. 9Highway Capacity Manual; Transportation Research Board; Washington, DC; 2010. 3 - 8703 - TIA 0322 24 ANALYSIS RESULTS Level-of-service and vehicle queue analyses were conducted for 2022 Existing, 2029 No-Build, and 2029 Build conditions for the intersections within the study area. The results of the intersection capacity and vehicle queue analyses are summarized for signalized and unsignalized intersections in Tables 11 and 12, respectively, with the detailed analysis results presented in the Appendix. The following is a summary of the level-of-service and delay analyses for the intersections within the study area: Signalized Intersections Project-related impacts at the signalized study area intersections are shown in Table 11 and are defined as follows: Webb Street at Essex Street and Szetela Lane Under all conditions, this signalized intersection operates at an overall LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and at LOS B during the weekday evening peak hour. With the addition of the proposed residential trips and the elimination of the site existing trips, the level of service remained the same with a slight decrease of 0.3 seconds in delay during the weekday morning peak hour and a 0.2 second delay increase during the weekday evening peak hour. Overall, delay decrease during the weekday morning peak hour is due to the elimination of the existing elderly housing traffic at the Szetela Lane southbound approach. It is important to note that the existing site driveway onto Szetela Lane will be eliminate as part of this project and all traffic generated by the new proposed residential development will be redirected to Fort Avenue. Unsignalized Intersections Project-related impacts at the unsignalized study area intersections are shown in Table 12 and are defined as follows: Webb Street at Fort Avenue All movements at this unsignalized intersection are predicted to operate at LOS B with minimal vehicle queuing (less than one (1) vehicle). Existing Site Driveways All movements exiting the Lee Fort Terrace to Fort Avenue were shown to operate at LOS B or better during both peak hours with negligible vehicle queuing expected. All the movements exiting the site parking lot to Szetela Lane also were shown to operate at LOS C or better during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Please note that the Lee Fort Terrace and parking lot access to Szetela Lane will be removed as part of this Project, and a new driveway onto Fort Avenue will be constructed to accommodate the Project. Proposed Site Driveways Under 2029 Build conditions, all proposed driveways are expected to operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with negligible vehicle queuing expected. G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx 25 Table 11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE AND VEHICLE QUEUE SUMMARY 2022 Existing 2029 No-Build 2029 Build Signalized Intersection/ Critical Movement/Peak Hour V/Ca Delayb LOSc Queued Ave/95th V/Ca Delay LOS Queue Ave/95th V/C Delay LOS Queue Ave/95th Webb Street/Essex Street and Szetela Lane: Weekday Morning: Webb Street EB LT/TH/RT Webb Street WB LT/TH/RT Essex Street NB LT/TH/RT Szetela Lane SB LT/TH/RT Overall Weekday Evening: Webb Street EB LT/TH/RT Webb Street WB LT/TH/RT Essex Street NB LT/TH/RT Szetela Lane SB LT/TH/RT Overall 0.79 0.60 0.30 0.44 -- 0.33 0.37 0.18 0.20 -- 30.6 18.8 20.6 19.3 22.2 9.4 11.0 14.9 10.0 10.8 C B C B C A B B B B 85/209 97/244 34/136 71/187 -- 19/135 33/184 10/53 7/52 -- 0.82 0.62 0.35 0.54 -- 0.34 0.39 0.19 0.21 -- 32.7 18.8 22.5 23.2 24.2 9.6 11.3 15.7 10.8 11.2 C B C C C A B B B B 96/233 107/263 41/149 94/213 -- 22/149 38/203 11/57 8/58 -- 0.82 0.65 0.36 0.49 -- 0.35 0.41 0.21 0.21 -- 33.0 19.8 22.8 21.0 23.9 9.8 11.4 15.8 10.8 11.4 C B C C C A B B B B 95/231 115/280 42/150 85/203 -- 24/160 41/215 13/62 8/57 -- aVolume-to-capacity ratio. bDelay in seconds per vehicle. cLevel of service. dQueue length, in vehicles. NB = northbound; SB = southbound; EB = eastbound; WB = westbound; LT = left-turning movements; TH = through movements; RT = right-turning movements. G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx 26 Table 12 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE AND VEHICLE QUEUE SUMMARY Unsignalized Intersection/ Critical Movement/Peak Hour 2022 Existing 2029 No-Build 2029 Build Demanda Delayb LOSc Queue 95th Percentile Demand Delay LOS Queue 95th Percentile Demand Delay LOS Queue 95th Percentile Webb Street at Fort Avenue: Weekday Morning: Webb Street WB LT/RT Weekday Evening: Webb Street WB LT/RT 185 162 13.7 12.3 B B 1.5 1.2 198 174 14.5 12.8 B B 1.8 1.4 198 174 14.9 13.4 B B 1.9 1.5 Lee Fort Terrace/Site Drive at Fort Avenue: Weekday Morning: Lee Fort Terrace/Site Drive SB LT/RT Fort Avenue EB LT Weekday Evening: Lee Fort Terrace/Site Drive SB LT/RT Fort Avenue EB LT 2 6 1 3 9.4 7.7 9.1 7.6 A A A A 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 3 9.5 7.7 9.2 7.6 A A A A 0 0 0 0 20 6 16 21 9.7 7.7 9.7 7.6 A A A A 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 Lee Fort Terrace at Szetela Lane: Weekday Morning: Lee Fort Terrace NB LT/RT Szetela Lane WB LT Weekday Evening: Lee Fort Terrace NB LT/RT Szetela Lane WB LT 8 0 2 0 13.3 -- 9.5 -- B -- A -- 0.1 -- 0.0 -- 8 0 2 0 13.9 -- 9.6 -- B -- A -- 0 -- 0 -- The Driveway will be removed Szetela Lane at the Site Parking Lot: Weekday Morning: Site Parking Lot NB LT/RT Szetela Lane WB LT Weekday Evening: Site Parking Lot NB LT/RT Szetela Lane WB LT 1 0 0 0 15.3 -- -- -- C -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- 1 0 14 0 16.2 -- 10.8 -- C -- B -- 0 -- 0 -- The Driveway will be removed aVolume-to-capacity ratio. bControl (signal) delay per vehicle in seconds. cLevel of service. dQueue length in vehicle. NB = northbound; SB = southbound; EB = eastbound; WB = westbound; LT = left-turning movements; TH = through movements; RT = right-turning movements. G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx 27 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VAI has prepared this TIA in order to evaluate potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed residential development to be located off Fort Avenue in Salem, Massachusetts (the “Project”). This study was prepared in accordance with the MassDOT Guidelines for Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) Guideline.; and was conducted pursuant to the standards of the Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Professions for the preparation of such reports. Based on the results of this study, the following can be concluded: • The proposed 124 residential units are expected to generate approximately 448 new vehicle trips on an average weekday (two-way, 24-hour volume), with 27 new vehicle trips (7 entering and 20 exiting) expected during the weekday morning peak hour and 39 new vehicle trips (23 entering and 16 exiting) expected during the weekday evening peak hour. • No apparent safety deficiencies were noted with respect to the motor vehicle crash history at the study area intersections. • The proposed parking supply of 100 parking spaces is higher than the typical peak demand for similar facilities and sufficient parking spaces will be available at this facility. • Project-related traffic increases are projected to range between -6 to 19 vehicles during peak hours, with traffic percent increases ranging -2.3 to 3.3 percent. Traffic decreased will be expected as the exiting site drive (Lee Fort Terrace) off Szetela Lane will be eliminated as part of this project. • The Project will not have a significant impact (increase) on motorist delays or vehicle queuing over Existing or anticipated future conditions without the Project (No-Build conditions). In consideration of the above, we have concluded that the Project can be accommodated within the confines of the existing transportation infrastructure in a safe and efficient manner with the implementation of the following recommendations. G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx 28 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations have been developed as a part of this evaluation and, where applicable, will be completed in conjunction with the Project subject to receipt of all necessary rights, permits, and approvals. Project Access Access and egress to the proposed residential development is proposed by one full-access driveway off of Fort Avenue. The following recommendations are offered with respect to Project access, internal circulation, and parking, many of which are already reflected on the Site Plans for the Project: • The Project site driveways and internal circulating drives should be a minimum of 22 feet in width where two-way traffic is to be conveyed and designed to accommodate the turning and maneuvering requirements of the largest anticipated responding emergency vehicle as defined by the Salem Fire Department. • Vehicles exiting the Project site should be placed under STOP-sign control with a marked STOP line provided. • At the Fort Avenue site driveway, the existing school fence be set back sufficiently from the edge of the roadways (approximately 6 feet) so as not to inhibit the available sightlines. It is also recommended that a “NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER” sign be installed to prohibit vehicles parking between site driveway and school crosswalk. Vehicles parked within this location would block sight lines from vehicles exiting from the proposed site driveway. • All signs and pavement markings to be installed within the Project site should conform to the applicable standards of the MUTCD.10 • ADA-compliant wheelchair ramps should be provided at all pedestrian crossings internal to the Project site and for crossing the Project site driveways. • Signs and landscaping to be installed as a part of the Project within intersection sight triangle areas of the Project site driveways should be designed and maintained so as not to restrict lines of sight. • Snow windows within the sight triangle areas of the Project site driveways and at intersections within the Project site should be promptly removed where such accumulations would impede sightlines. • A school bus waiting area should be provided at an appropriate location defined in consultation with the Salem Public Schools. 10Ibid 1. G:\8703 Salem, MA\Report\3 - 8703 - TIA 0322.docx 29 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan As is the case with residential developments, a major focus of the traffic mitigation plan focuses on the reduction of SOVs arriving and departing to and from the site. This is predominantly accomplished by developing a comprehensive TDM strategy. In consultation with the Town, the proponent is committed to supporting a balanced multimodal transportation plan to serve the residents and visitors of the site. In an effort to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation to SOVs, the following TDM measures will be implemented as a part of the Project: • A transportation coordinator will be designated for the Project to coordinate the elements of the TDM program. • Information regarding public transportation services, maps, schedules, and fare information will be posted in a central location and/or otherwise made available to residents. • A “welcome packet” will be provided to residents detailing available public transportation services, bicycle and walking alternatives, and available commuter options. Pedestrian accommodations will be incorporated into the Project and consist of sidewalks and ADA- compliant wheelchair ramps at all pedestrian crossings internal to the Project site that will link building entrances to the sidewalk infrastructure along Fort Avenue. • Secure bicycle parking will be provided within the Project site consisting of both exterior and interior (covered) bicycle parking. • Work-at-home workspaces will be provided to support telecommuting by residents of the Project. • Consideration should be given to installing accommodations for the charging of electric vehicles by residents of the Project. • On site parking demand should be periodically reviewed by the transportation coordinator. With implementation of the above recommendations, safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access will be provided to the Project site and the Project can be accommodated within the confines of the existing transportation system. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Project will not result in a significant impact on overall operations. With the implementation of the above recommendations, safe and efficient access will be provided to the planned development and the proposed development can be constructed with minimal impact to the area as designed. APPENDIX TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS TRAFFIC ADJUSTMENTS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SCHEDULES SALEM BIKE ROUTES MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH DATA GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS EXISTING SITE TRIPS TO BE REMOVED TRIP DISTRIBUTION U.S. CENSUS DATA TRIP GENERATION PARKING ANALYSIS CAPACITY ANALYSIS TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right Thru Right Left Thru Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 22 2 1 18 43 07:15 AM 0 0 33 3 0 2 38 07:30 AM 0 2 32 1 1 12 48 07:45 AM 0 1 21 1 0 11 34 Total 0 3 108 7 2 43 163 08:00 AM 0 0 28 0 3 21 52 08:15 AM 0 0 17 2 1 10 30 08:30 AM 0 1 30 5 2 21 59 08:45 AM 0 0 24 1 1 6 32 Total 0 1 99 8 7 58 173 Grand Total 0 4 207 15 9 101 336 Apprch %0 100 93.2 6.8 8.2 91.8 Total %0 1.2 61.6 4.5 2.7 30.1 Cars 0 4 192 15 9 97 317 % Cars 0 100 92.8 100 100 96 94.3 Trucks 0 0 15 0 0 4 19 % Trucks 0 0 7.2 0 0 4 5.7 Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 1 1 21 1 22 0 11 11 34 08:00 AM 0 0 0 28 0 28 3 21 24 52 08:15 AM 0 0 0 17 2 19 1 10 11 30 08:30 AM 0 1 1 30 5 35 2 21 23 59 Total Volume 0 2 2 96 8 104 6 63 69 175 % App. Total 0 100 92.3 7.7 8.7 91.3 PHF .000 .500 .500 .800 .400 .743 .500 .750 .719 .742 Cars 0 2 2 91 8 99 6 62 68 169 % Cars 0 100 100 94.8 100 95.2 100 98.4 98.6 96.6 Trucks 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 1 1 6 % Trucks 0 0 0 5.2 0 4.8 0 1.6 1.4 3.4 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Lee Fort Terr Fort Ave Fort Ave Right 2 0 2 Left 0 0 0 InOut Total 14 2 16 0 0 0 14 16 2 Right8 0 8 Thru91 5 96 OutTotalIn62 99 161 1 5 6 63 167 104 Left6 0 6 Thru62 1 63 TotalOutIn93 68 161 5 1 6 98 167 69 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins.0 0 0 33 3 36 0 11 11 +15 mins.0 0 0 32 1 33 3 21 24 +30 mins.0 2 2 21 1 22 1 10 11 +45 mins.0 1 1 28 0 28 2 21 23 Total Volume 0 3 3 114 5 119 6 63 69 % App. Total 0 100 95.8 4.2 8.7 91.3 PHF .000 .375 .375 .864 .417 .826 .500 .750 .719 Cars 0 3 3 108 5 113 6 62 68 % Cars 0 100 100 94.7 100 95 100 98.4 98.6 Trucks 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 1 1 % Trucks 0 0 0 5.3 0 5 0 1.6 1.4 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Left Thru Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Lee Fort Terr Fort Ave Fort Ave Right 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right Thru Right Left Thru Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 31 0 0 15 46 04:15 PM 0 0 24 1 1 9 35 04:30 PM 0 1 29 0 1 10 41 04:45 PM 0 0 17 0 0 15 32 Total 0 1 101 1 2 49 154 05:00 PM 0 0 23 0 1 25 49 05:15 PM 0 0 10 0 2 9 21 05:30 PM 0 1 16 0 2 8 27 05:45 PM 0 0 17 0 1 9 27 Total 0 1 66 0 6 51 124 Grand Total 0 2 167 1 8 100 278 Apprch %0 100 99.4 0.6 7.4 92.6 Total %0 0.7 60.1 0.4 2.9 36 Cars 0 2 162 1 8 96 269 % Cars 0 100 97 100 100 96 96.8 Trucks 0 0 5 0 0 4 9 % Trucks 0 0 3 0 0 4 3.2 Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 0 0 24 1 25 1 9 10 35 04:30 PM 0 1 1 29 0 29 1 10 11 41 04:45 PM 0 0 0 17 0 17 0 15 15 32 05:00 PM 0 0 0 23 0 23 1 25 26 49 Total Volume 0 1 1 93 1 94 3 59 62 157 % App. Total 0 100 98.9 1.1 4.8 95.2 PHF .000 .250 .250 .802 .250 .810 .750 .590 .596 .801 Cars 0 1 1 90 1 91 3 56 59 151 % Cars 0 100 100 96.8 100 96.8 100 94.9 95.2 96.2 Trucks 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 6 % Trucks 0 0 0 3.2 0 3.2 0 5.1 4.8 3.8 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Lee Fort Terr Fort Ave Fort Ave Right 1 0 1 Left 0 0 0 InOut Total 4 1 5 0 0 0 4 5 1 Right1 0 1 Thru90 3 93 OutTotalIn56 91 147 3 3 6 59 153 94 Left3 0 3 Thru56 3 59 TotalOutIn91 59 150 3 3 6 94 156 62 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM +0 mins.0 0 0 31 0 31 1 10 11 +15 mins.0 0 0 24 1 25 0 15 15 +30 mins.0 1 1 29 0 29 1 25 26 +45 mins.0 0 0 17 0 17 2 9 11 Total Volume 0 1 1 101 1 102 4 59 63 % App. Total 0 100 99 1 6.3 93.7 PHF .000 .250 .250 .815 .250 .823 .500 .590 .606 Cars 0 1 1 99 1 100 4 57 61 % Cars 0 100 100 98 100 98 100 96.6 96.8 Trucks 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 3.4 3.2 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Left Thru Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Lee Fort Terr From North Fort Ave From East Fort Ave From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030001 Site Code : 87030001 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Fort Avenue City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Lee Fort Terr Fort Ave Fort Ave Right 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Left Right Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 9 0 1 19 1 30 07:15 AM 0 54 2 2 77 2 137 07:30 AM 0 77 1 1 57 0 136 07:45 AM 0 27 1 0 22 0 50 Total 0 167 4 4 175 3 353 08:00 AM 0 15 0 1 26 0 42 08:15 AM 0 15 1 1 23 0 40 08:30 AM 0 45 2 4 19 2 72 08:45 AM 0 23 1 0 6 0 30 Total 0 98 4 6 74 2 184 Grand Total 0 265 8 10 249 5 537 Apprch %0 100 44.4 55.6 98 2 Total %0 49.3 1.5 1.9 46.4 0.9 Cars 0 265 8 10 247 5 535 % Cars 0 100 100 100 99.2 100 99.6 Trucks 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0.4 Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 54 54 2 2 4 77 2 79 137 07:30 AM 0 77 77 1 1 2 57 0 57 136 07:45 AM 0 27 27 1 0 1 22 0 22 50 08:00 AM 0 15 15 0 1 1 26 0 26 42 Total Volume 0 173 173 4 4 8 182 2 184 365 % App. Total 0 100 50 50 98.9 1.1 PHF .000 .562 .562 .500 .500 .500 .591 .250 .582 .666 Cars 0 173 173 4 4 8 180 2 182 363 % Cars 0 100 100 100 100 100 98.9 100 98.9 99.5 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 1.1 0.5 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Lee Fort Terr Thru173 0 173 Left0 0 0 OutTotalIn184 173 357 2 0 2 186 359 173 Left 4 0 4 Right 4 0 4 Out TotalIn 2 8 10 0 0 0 2 10 8 Thru180 2 182 Right2 0 2 TotalOutIn177 182 359 0 2 2 177 361 184 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:45 AM 07:15 AM +0 mins.0 54 54 1 0 1 77 2 79 +15 mins.0 77 77 0 1 1 57 0 57 +30 mins.0 27 27 1 1 2 22 0 22 +45 mins.0 15 15 2 4 6 26 0 26 Total Volume 0 173 173 4 6 10 182 2 184 % App. Total 0 100 40 60 98.9 1.1 PHF .000 .562 .562 .500 .375 .417 .591 .250 .582 Cars 0 173 173 4 6 10 180 2 182 % Cars 0 100 100 100 100 100 98.9 100 98.9 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 1.1 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Peds Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Lee Fort Terr Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Left Right Thru Right Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 18 1 0 7 0 26 04:15 PM 0 10 1 0 3 0 14 04:30 PM 0 21 0 0 8 1 30 04:45 PM 0 15 0 0 8 0 23 Total 0 64 2 0 26 1 93 05:00 PM 0 19 1 0 5 0 25 05:15 PM 0 9 1 0 11 0 21 05:30 PM 0 10 0 0 9 0 19 05:45 PM 0 10 0 0 6 0 16 Total 0 48 2 0 31 0 81 Grand Total 0 112 4 0 57 1 174 Apprch %0 100 100 0 98.3 1.7 Total %0 64.4 2.3 0 32.8 0.6 Cars 0 111 4 0 56 1 172 % Cars 0 99.1 100 0 98.2 100 98.9 Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 % Trucks 0 0.9 0 0 1.8 0 1.1 Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 21 21 0 0 0 8 1 9 30 04:45 PM 0 15 15 0 0 0 8 0 8 23 05:00 PM 0 19 19 1 0 1 5 0 5 25 05:15 PM 0 9 9 1 0 1 11 0 11 21 Total Volume 0 64 64 2 0 2 32 1 33 99 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 97 3 PHF .000 .762 .762 .500 .000 .500 .727 .250 .750 .825 Cars 0 63 63 2 0 2 31 1 32 97 % Cars 0 98.4 98.4 100 0 100 96.9 100 97.0 98.0 Trucks 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 % Trucks 0 1.6 1.6 0 0 0 3.1 0 3.0 2.0 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Lee Fort Terr Thru63 1 64 Left0 0 0 OutTotalIn31 63 94 1 1 2 32 96 64 Left 2 0 2 Right 0 0 0 Out TotalIn 1 2 3 0 0 0 1 3 2 Thru31 1 32 Right1 0 1 TotalOutIn65 32 97 1 1 2 66 99 33 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM +0 mins.0 10 10 1 0 1 8 1 9 +15 mins.0 21 21 1 0 1 8 0 8 +30 mins.0 15 15 0 0 0 5 0 5 +45 mins.0 19 19 0 0 0 11 0 11 Total Volume 0 65 65 2 0 2 32 1 33 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 97 3 PHF .000 .774 .774 .500 .000 .500 .727 .250 .750 Cars 0 64 64 2 0 2 31 1 32 % Cars 0 98.5 98.5 100 0 100 96.9 100 97 Trucks 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 % Trucks 0 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 3.1 0 3 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Peds Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:15 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 Grand Total 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Szetela Ln From East Lee Fort Terr From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030002 Site Code : 87030002 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Lee Fort Terrace E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Lee Fort Terr Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Left Right Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 9 0 0 20 0 29 07:15 AM 0 55 0 0 80 0 135 07:30 AM 0 78 1 0 56 0 135 07:45 AM 0 28 0 0 22 0 50 Total 0 170 1 0 178 0 349 08:00 AM 0 15 0 0 26 1 42 08:15 AM 0 16 0 0 23 0 39 08:30 AM 0 47 0 0 20 0 67 08:45 AM 0 24 0 0 7 0 31 Total 0 102 0 0 76 1 179 Grand Total 0 272 1 0 254 1 528 Apprch %0 100 100 0 99.6 0.4 Total %0 51.5 0.2 0 48.1 0.2 Cars 0 272 1 0 252 1 526 % Cars 0 100 100 0 99.2 100 99.6 Trucks 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0.4 Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 55 55 0 0 0 80 0 80 135 07:30 AM 0 78 78 1 0 1 56 0 56 135 07:45 AM 0 28 28 0 0 0 22 0 22 50 08:00 AM 0 15 15 0 0 0 26 1 27 42 Total Volume 0 176 176 1 0 1 184 1 185 362 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 99.5 0.5 PHF .000 .564 .564 .250 .000 .250 .575 .250 .578 .670 Cars 0 176 176 1 0 1 182 1 183 360 % Cars 0 100 100 100 0 100 98.9 100 98.9 99.4 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 1.1 0.6 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Driveway Thru176 0 176 Left0 0 0 OutTotalIn182 176 358 2 0 2 184 360 176 Left 1 0 1 Right 0 0 0 Out TotalIn 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 Thru182 2 184 Right1 0 1 TotalOutIn177 183 360 0 2 2 177 362 185 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM +0 mins.0 55 55 0 0 0 80 0 80 +15 mins.0 78 78 0 0 0 56 0 56 +30 mins.0 28 28 1 0 1 22 0 22 +45 mins.0 15 15 0 0 0 26 1 27 Total Volume 0 176 176 1 0 1 184 1 185 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 99.5 0.5 PHF .000 .564 .564 .250 .000 .250 .575 .250 .578 Cars 0 176 176 1 0 1 182 1 183 % Cars 0 100 100 100 0 100 98.9 100 98.9 Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 1.1 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Peds Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Driveway Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Left Right Thru Right Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 19 0 0 7 0 26 04:15 PM 0 11 1 0 3 0 15 04:30 PM 0 21 0 0 9 0 30 04:45 PM 0 15 0 0 8 0 23 Total 0 66 1 0 27 0 94 05:00 PM 0 20 0 0 5 0 25 05:15 PM 0 10 0 0 11 0 21 05:30 PM 0 10 0 0 10 0 20 05:45 PM 0 9 0 0 5 0 14 Total 0 49 0 0 31 0 80 Grand Total 0 115 1 0 58 0 174 Apprch %0 100 100 0 100 0 Total %0 66.1 0.6 0 33.3 0 Cars 0 114 1 0 57 0 172 % Cars 0 99.1 100 0 98.3 0 98.9 Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 % Trucks 0 0.9 0 0 1.7 0 1.1 Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 21 21 0 0 0 9 0 9 30 04:45 PM 0 15 15 0 0 0 8 0 8 23 05:00 PM 0 20 20 0 0 0 5 0 5 25 05:15 PM 0 10 10 0 0 0 11 0 11 21 Total Volume 0 66 66 0 0 0 33 0 33 99 % App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .786 .786 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .825 Cars 0 65 65 0 0 0 32 0 32 97 % Cars 0 98.5 98.5 0 0 0 97.0 0 97.0 98.0 Trucks 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 % Trucks 0 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 3.0 0 3.0 2.0 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Driveway Thru65 1 66 Left0 0 0 OutTotalIn32 65 97 1 1 2 33 99 66 Left 0 0 0 Right 0 0 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thru32 1 33 Right0 0 0 TotalOutIn65 32 97 1 1 2 66 99 33 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:45 PM +0 mins.0 11 11 0 0 0 8 0 8 +15 mins.0 21 21 1 0 1 5 0 5 +30 mins.0 15 15 0 0 0 11 0 11 +45 mins.0 20 20 0 0 0 10 0 10 Total Volume 0 67 67 1 0 1 34 0 34 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 100 0 PHF .000 .798 .798 .250 .000 .250 .773 .000 .773 Cars 0 66 66 1 0 1 33 0 33 % Cars 0 98.5 98.5 100 0 100 97.1 0 97.1 Trucks 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 % Trucks 0 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 2.9 0 2.9 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru Peds Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Szetela Ln From East Driveway From South Szetela Ln From West Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030003 Site Code : 87030003 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Driveway E/W Street : Szetela Lane City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Szetela Ln Driveway Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 2 8 10 30 1 7 4 3 18 17 4 104 07:15 AM 0 27 27 20 33 21 10 25 0 31 3 4 201 07:30 AM 1 47 29 22 39 20 11 13 1 22 10 13 228 07:45 AM 0 14 19 14 38 4 16 3 1 18 10 17 154 Total 1 90 83 66 140 46 44 45 5 89 40 38 687 08:00 AM 0 5 9 15 42 3 14 4 2 23 25 12 154 08:15 AM 0 9 9 14 30 5 7 0 0 18 11 18 121 08:30 AM 0 21 23 14 31 3 12 4 3 15 20 7 153 08:45 AM 0 11 17 24 24 1 4 2 0 4 7 14 108 Total 0 46 58 67 127 12 37 10 5 60 63 51 536 Grand Total 1 136 141 133 267 58 81 55 10 149 103 89 1223 Apprch %0.4 48.9 50.7 29 58.3 12.7 55.5 37.7 6.8 43.7 30.2 26.1 Total %0.1 11.1 11.5 10.9 21.8 4.7 6.6 4.5 0.8 12.2 8.4 7.3 Cars 1 136 141 123 260 57 79 55 10 148 98 87 1195 % Cars 100 100 100 92.5 97.4 98.3 97.5 100 100 99.3 95.1 97.8 97.7 Trucks 0 0 0 10 7 1 2 0 0 1 5 2 28 % Trucks 0 0 0 7.5 2.6 1.7 2.5 0 0 0.7 4.9 2.2 2.3 Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 27 27 54 20 33 21 74 10 25 0 35 31 3 4 38 201 07:30 AM 1 47 29 77 22 39 20 81 11 13 1 25 22 10 13 45 228 07:45 AM 0 14 19 33 14 38 4 56 16 3 1 20 18 10 17 45 154 08:00 AM 0 5 9 14 15 42 3 60 14 4 2 20 23 25 12 60 154 Total Volume 1 93 84 178 71 152 48 271 51 45 4 100 94 48 46 188 737 % App. Total 0.6 52.2 47.2 26.2 56.1 17.7 51 45 4 50 25.5 24.5 PHF .250 .495 .724 .578 .807 .905 .571 .836 .797 .450 .500 .714 .758 .480 .676 .783 .808 Cars 1 93 84 178 68 149 47 264 49 45 4 98 93 46 44 183 723 % Cars 100 100 100 100 95.8 98.0 97.9 97.4 96.1 100 100 98.0 98.9 95.8 95.7 97.3 98.1 Trucks 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 7 2 0 0 2 1 2 2 5 14 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 4.2 2.0 2.1 2.6 3.9 0 0 2.0 1.1 4.2 4.3 2.7 1.9 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Webb St Webb St Essex St Right 84 0 84 Thru 93 0 93 Left 1 0 1 InOut Total 185 178 363 2 0 2 187 365 178 Right47 1 48 Thru149 3 152 Left68 3 71 OutTotalIn51 264 315 2 7 9 53 324 271 Left 49 2 51 Thru 45 0 45 Right 4 0 4 Out TotalIn 205 98 303 5 2 7 210 310 100 Left93 1 94 Thru46 2 48 Right44 2 46 TotalOutIn282 183 465 5 5 10 287 475 188 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM +0 mins.0 27 27 54 20 33 21 74 10 25 0 35 22 10 13 45 +15 mins.1 47 29 77 22 39 20 81 11 13 1 25 18 10 17 45 +30 mins.0 14 19 33 14 38 4 56 16 3 1 20 23 25 12 60 +45 mins.0 5 9 14 15 42 3 60 14 4 2 20 18 11 18 47 Total Volume 1 93 84 178 71 152 48 271 51 45 4 100 81 56 60 197 % App. Total 0.6 52.2 47.2 26.2 56.1 17.7 51 45 4 41.1 28.4 30.5 PHF .250 .495 .724 .578 .807 .905 .571 .836 .797 .450 .500 .714 .880 .560 .833 .821 Cars 1 93 84 178 68 149 47 264 49 45 4 98 80 54 58 192 % Cars 100 100 100 100 95.8 98 97.9 97.4 96.1 100 100 98 98.8 96.4 96.7 97.5 Trucks 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 7 2 0 0 2 1 2 2 5 % Trucks 0 0 0 0 4.2 2 2.1 2.6 3.9 0 0 2 1.2 3.6 3.3 2.5 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 6 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 3 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 7 0 7 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 9 14 0 14 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 13 20 0 20 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Webb St Webb St Essex St Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 7 12 18 48 2 9 3 1 2 16 11 129 04:15 PM 0 3 11 9 45 0 4 1 1 3 16 24 117 04:30 PM 1 10 10 18 41 1 16 3 0 6 13 22 141 04:45 PM 0 6 9 10 31 1 5 1 2 7 20 17 109 Total 1 26 42 55 165 4 34 8 4 18 65 74 496 05:00 PM 0 10 15 11 34 1 10 3 3 1 30 18 136 05:15 PM 0 7 2 8 33 0 14 4 1 8 12 23 112 05:30 PM 0 5 7 15 29 2 9 1 2 8 16 22 116 05:45 PM 0 6 3 13 25 0 7 0 2 5 16 20 97 Total 0 28 27 47 121 3 40 8 8 22 74 83 461 Grand Total 1 54 69 102 286 7 74 16 12 40 139 157 957 Apprch %0.8 43.5 55.6 25.8 72.4 1.8 72.5 15.7 11.8 11.9 41.4 46.7 Total %0.1 5.6 7.2 10.7 29.9 0.7 7.7 1.7 1.3 4.2 14.5 16.4 Cars 1 53 69 102 282 7 74 16 12 39 136 156 947 % Cars 100 98.1 100 100 98.6 100 100 100 100 97.5 97.8 99.4 99 Trucks 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 10 % Trucks 0 1.9 0 0 1.4 0 0 0 0 2.5 2.2 0.6 1 Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 3 11 14 9 45 0 54 4 1 1 6 3 16 24 43 117 04:30 PM 1 10 10 21 18 41 1 60 16 3 0 19 6 13 22 41 141 04:45 PM 0 6 9 15 10 31 1 42 5 1 2 8 7 20 17 44 109 05:00 PM 0 10 15 25 11 34 1 46 10 3 3 16 1 30 18 49 136 Total Volume 1 29 45 75 48 151 3 202 35 8 6 49 17 79 81 177 503 % App. Total 1.3 38.7 60 23.8 74.8 1.5 71.4 16.3 12.2 9.6 44.6 45.8 PHF .250 .725 .750 .750 .667 .839 .750 .842 .547 .667 .500 .645 .607 .658 .844 .903 .892 Cars 1 28 45 74 48 149 3 200 35 8 6 49 16 77 80 173 496 % Cars 100 96.6 100 98.7 100 98.7 100 99.0 100 100 100 100 94.1 97.5 98.8 97.7 98.6 Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 7 % Trucks 0 3.4 0 1.3 0 1.3 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 5.9 2.5 1.2 2.3 1.4 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Webb St Webb St Essex St Right 45 0 45 Thru 28 1 29 Left 1 0 1 InOut Total 27 74 101 1 1 2 28 103 75 Right3 0 3 Thru149 2 151 Left48 0 48 OutTotalIn84 200 284 2 2 4 86 288 202 Left 35 0 35 Thru 8 0 8 Right 6 0 6 Out TotalIn 156 49 205 2 0 2 158 207 49 Left16 1 17 Thru77 2 79 Right80 1 81 TotalOutIn229 173 402 2 4 6 231 408 177 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM +0 mins.0 3 11 14 18 48 2 68 16 3 0 19 7 20 17 44 +15 mins.1 10 10 21 9 45 0 54 5 1 2 8 1 30 18 49 +30 mins.0 6 9 15 18 41 1 60 10 3 3 16 8 12 23 43 +45 mins.0 10 15 25 10 31 1 42 14 4 1 19 8 16 22 46 Total Volume 1 29 45 75 55 165 4 224 45 11 6 62 24 78 80 182 % App. Total 1.3 38.7 60 24.6 73.7 1.8 72.6 17.7 9.7 13.2 42.9 44 PHF .250 .725 .750 .750 .764 .859 .500 .824 .703 .688 .500 .816 .750 .650 .870 .929 Cars 1 28 45 74 55 163 4 222 45 11 6 62 23 76 79 178 % Cars 100 96.6 100 98.7 100 98.8 100 99.1 100 100 100 100 95.8 97.4 98.8 97.8 Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 % Trucks 0 3.4 0 1.3 0 1.2 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 4.2 2.6 1.2 2.2 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 5 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 1 6 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 5 Grand Total 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 10 1 11 Apprch %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90.9 9.1 Szetela Ln From North Webb St From East Essex St From South Webb St From West Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030004 Site Code : 87030004 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Szetela Ln / Essex St E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Szetela Ln Webb St Webb St Essex St Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru1 Left0 OutTotalIn0 1 1 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn1 0 1 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right Thru Right Left Thru Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 23 14 0 19 1 57 07:15 AM 0 34 43 0 2 0 79 07:30 AM 0 37 41 0 12 0 90 07:45 AM 0 21 33 0 11 0 65 Total 0 115 131 0 44 1 291 08:00 AM 0 32 29 0 26 3 90 08:15 AM 0 17 31 0 9 2 59 08:30 AM 0 31 15 0 23 0 69 08:45 AM 0 25 22 1 7 0 55 Total 0 105 97 1 65 5 273 Grand Total 0 220 228 1 109 6 564 Apprch %0 100 99.6 0.4 94.8 5.2 Total %0 39 40.4 0.2 19.3 1.1 Cars 0 205 224 1 106 6 542 % Cars 0 93.2 98.2 100 97.2 100 96.1 Trucks 0 15 4 0 3 0 22 % Trucks 0 6.8 1.8 0 2.8 0 3.9 Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 34 34 43 0 43 2 0 2 79 07:30 AM 0 37 37 41 0 41 12 0 12 90 07:45 AM 0 21 21 33 0 33 11 0 11 65 08:00 AM 0 32 32 29 0 29 26 3 29 90 Total Volume 0 124 124 146 0 146 51 3 54 324 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 94.4 5.6 PHF .000 .838 .838 .849 .000 .849 .490 .250 .466 .900 Cars 0 117 117 145 0 145 50 3 53 315 % Cars 0 94.4 94.4 99.3 0 99.3 98.0 100 98.1 97.2 Trucks 0 7 7 1 0 1 1 0 1 9 % Trucks 0 5.6 5.6 0.7 0 0.7 2.0 0 1.9 2.8 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Fort Ave Webb St Webb St Right 117 7 124 Left 0 0 0 InOut Total 50 117 167 1 7 8 51 175 124 Right0 0 0 Thru145 1 146 OutTotalIn3 145 148 0 1 1 3 149 146 Left50 1 51 Thru3 0 3 TotalOutIn262 53 315 8 1 9 270 324 54 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins.0 34 34 43 0 43 11 0 11 +15 mins.0 37 37 41 0 41 26 3 29 +30 mins.0 21 21 33 0 33 9 2 11 +45 mins.0 32 32 29 0 29 23 0 23 Total Volume 0 124 124 146 0 146 69 5 74 % App. Total 0 100 100 0 93.2 6.8 PHF .000 .838 .838 .849 .000 .849 .663 .417 .638 Cars 0 117 117 145 0 145 68 5 73 % Cars 0 94.4 94.4 99.3 0 99.3 98.6 100 98.6 Trucks 0 7 7 1 0 1 1 0 1 % Trucks 0 5.6 5.6 0.7 0 0.7 1.4 0 1.4 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Left Thru Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 07:15 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 07:30 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 08:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 08:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Total 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 5 Grand Total 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 0 15 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 100 0 Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Fort Ave Webb St Webb St Right 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 1 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Cars - Trucks Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right Thru Right Left Thru Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 32 38 0 15 2 87 04:15 PM 0 24 31 0 11 5 71 04:30 PM 0 31 28 0 12 2 73 04:45 PM 0 19 24 1 18 4 66 Total 0 106 121 1 56 13 297 05:00 PM 0 23 24 2 27 4 80 05:15 PM 0 11 29 1 11 2 54 05:30 PM 1 16 28 2 11 7 65 05:45 PM 0 17 21 0 10 8 56 Total 1 67 102 5 59 21 255 Grand Total 1 173 223 6 115 34 552 Apprch %0.6 99.4 97.4 2.6 77.2 22.8 Total %0.2 31.3 40.4 1.1 20.8 6.2 Cars 1 169 222 6 112 34 544 % Cars 100 97.7 99.6 100 97.4 100 98.6 Trucks 0 4 1 0 3 0 8 % Trucks 0 2.3 0.4 0 2.6 0 1.4 Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 32 32 38 0 38 15 2 17 87 04:15 PM 0 24 24 31 0 31 11 5 16 71 04:30 PM 0 31 31 28 0 28 12 2 14 73 04:45 PM 0 19 19 24 1 25 18 4 22 66 Total Volume 0 106 106 121 1 122 56 13 69 297 % App. Total 0 100 99.2 0.8 81.2 18.8 PHF .000 .828 .828 .796 .250 .803 .778 .650 .784 .853 Cars 0 104 104 120 1 121 54 13 67 292 % Cars 0 98.1 98.1 99.2 100 99.2 96.4 100 97.1 98.3 Trucks 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 0 2 5 % Trucks 0 1.9 1.9 0.8 0 0.8 3.6 0 2.9 1.7 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 2 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Fort Ave Webb St Webb St Right 104 2 106 Left 0 0 0 InOut Total 55 104 159 2 2 4 57 163 106 Right1 0 1 Thru120 1 121 OutTotalIn13 121 134 0 1 1 13 135 122 Left54 2 56 Thru13 0 13 TotalOutIn224 67 291 3 2 5 227 296 69 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Cars Trucks Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:45 PM +0 mins.0 32 32 38 0 38 18 4 22 +15 mins.0 24 24 31 0 31 27 4 31 +30 mins.0 31 31 28 0 28 11 2 13 +45 mins.0 19 19 24 1 25 11 7 18 Total Volume 0 106 106 121 1 122 67 17 84 % App. Total 0 100 99.2 0.8 79.8 20.2 PHF .000 .828 .828 .796 .250 .803 .620 .607 .677 Cars 0 104 104 120 1 121 65 17 82 % Cars 0 98.1 98.1 99.2 100 99.2 97 100 97.6 Trucks 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 0 2 % Trucks 0 1.9 1.9 0.8 0 0.8 3 0 2.4 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 10 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Groups Printed- Bikes Peds Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right Peds Thru Right Peds Left Thru Peds Exclu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 05:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 6 Grand Total 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 3 7 1 8 Apprch %0 0 100 0 0 0 Total %0 0 100 0 0 0 87.5 12.5 Fort Ave From North Webb St From East Webb St From West Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .250 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 File Name : 87030005 Site Code : 87030005 Start Date : 2/1/2022 Page No : 11 N/S Street : Fort Avenue E/W Street : Webb Street City/State : Salem, MA Weather : Cloudy Fort Ave Webb St Webb St Right 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru1 OutTotalIn0 1 1 Left0 Thru0 TotalOutIn1 0 1 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bikes Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 +45 mins.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 Accurate Counts 978-664-2565 TRAFFIC ADJUSTMENTS Generated 3/2/2022 Page 1 of 2 Massachusetts Highway Department Traffic Pattern by Month for 1/1/2019 - 12/31/2019 Criteria: Location ID = 5080, From 1/1/1900 To 12/31/2049 12:00:00 AM Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total PH Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total PH04:00 PM 9 46 90 12 14 0 23 62 36 62 59 14 427 4:00:00 PM 7 32 80 5 13 2 29 80 28 73 37 11 39704:15 PM 13 49 78 6 10 1 17 65 26 59 64 12 400 4:15:00 PM 9 43 85 2 11 0 20 49 13 66 40 12 35004:30 PM 8 49 87 16 15 5 29 63 35 60 60 8 435 4:30:00 PM 5 35 74 3 9 0 17 53 19 71 31 18 33504:45 PM 4 43 69 13 16 1 23 69 40 54 69 17 418 1680 4:45:00 PM 1 34 85 7 14 0 29 53 19 61 34 11 348 143005:00 PM 9 60 96 17 27 2 41 66 26 57 55 13 469 1722 5:00:00 PM 1 35 101 1 11 1 28 59 18 64 44 10 373 140605:15 PM 5 53 95 11 22 4 15 67 37 62 69 17 457 1779 5:15:00 PM 7 27 98 3 10 0 14 48 13 65 40 10 335 139105:30 PM 15 59 94 10 15 1 24 66 33 68 63 21 469 1813 5:30:00 PM 11 33 107 2 7 2 21 54 14 62 35 12 360 141605:45 PM 8 47 93 15 19 3 19 61 34 64 58 17 438 1833 5:45:00 PM 11 26 74 3 6 1 19 33 11 60 34 8 286 13543513 18332784 1430Seasonal Adjustment Seasonal Adjustment 15% 3202 1645Note: Annual Adjustment 1% year 2022 Baseline 3656 19071.14 1.16File Name: C:\Users\stevi\Dropbox\Work Files\2018\Petra\Salem, MA\VAI\7976\79760001.ppdStart Date: 6/28/2018Start Time: 4:00:00 PMSite Code: 79760001Comment 1: N/S Street : Congress StreetComment 2: E/W Street : Derby StreetComment 3: City/State : Salem, MAComment 4: Weather : RainCongress StFrom NorthDerby StFrom EastCongress StFrom SouthDerby StFrom WestJune 2018File Name: C:\Users\Jen\Documents\Countpro Petra\87030006.ppdStart Date: 9/2/2020Start Time: 7:00:00 AMSite Code: 87030006Comment 1: N/S Street : Hawthorn Blvd/Congress StComment 2: E/W Street : Derby StreetAboveComparissonSay COVID Adj 1.16Comment 3: City/State : Salem, MAComment 4: Weather : Cloudy / RainHawthorn BlvdFrom NorthDerby StFrom EastCongress StFrom SouthDerby StFrom WestFebruary 2022 5080595 12:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AMAverage AM Peak Hour 7-99:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PMDaily one day comparisson2019 Feb ADT 605 367 427 1011 1656 2998 3315 8244 10113 9179 8439 7172 7128 7259 7957 9143 8802 9808 10342 8244 5725 4219 3132 2196 1413 129715Tuesday, February 5, 20192019 Feb ADT Adj623 378 440 1042 1706 3089 3415 8494 10419 9457 8695 7389 7344 7479 8198 9420 9069 10105 10655 8494 5898 4347 3227 2263 1456 1336452022 Feb ADT595 348 343 460 1028 3278 6115 8700 8533 8617 6950 6682 6595 6780 7081 8107 9297 9368 9203 6999 4488 3493 2492 1501 1421 119857Tuesday, February 1, 2022COVID Adjustment1.05 1.09 1.28 2.27 1.66 0.94 0.56 0.98 1.22 1.10 1.25 1.11 1.11 1.10 1.16 1.16 0.98 1.08 1.16 1.21 1.31 1.24 1.29 1.51 1.02 1.1212:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AMAverage AM Peak Hour 7-99:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PMDaily one day comparisson2019 Feb ADT 639 376 366 427 1145 4394 7303 9586 9114 9350 8071 7330 7460 7589 8200 9441 9231 9608 9772 7986 5607 4154 3313 2205 1418 134735Tuesday, February 5, 20192019 Feb ADT Adj658 387 377 440 1180 4527 7524 9876 9390 9633 8316 7552 7686 7819 8448 9727 9511 9899 10068 8228 5777 4280 3413 2272 1461 1388182022 Feb ADT582 364 332 442 1089 3271 6359 8783 8698 8741 7080 6641 6611 6847 7376 7852 9321 9343 9311 6954 4604 3406 2515 1441 1439 120661Tuesday, February 1, 2022COVID Adjustment1.13 1.06 1.14 1.00 1.08 1.38 1.18 1.12 1.08 1.10 1.17 1.14 1.16 1.14 1.15 1.24 1.02 1.06 1.08 1.18 1.25 1.26 1.36 1.58 1.02 1.151.09 1.07 1.21 1.63 1.37 1.16 0.87 1.05 1.151.101.21 1.12 1.14 1.12 1.15 1.20 1.00 1.07 1.12 1.20 1.28 1.25 1.33 1.54 1.021.13Sta. 5080 2019-2022Growth Rate: 1%/YearSta. 595 2019-2022Growth Rate: 1%/Year Location ID: 5080 Seasonal Factor Group: U1‐EssexCounty: Essex Daily Factor Group:Functional Class 1 Axle Factor Group:U1‐EssexLocation: YANKEE DIVISION HIGHWAY Growth Factor Group:0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 Average PH 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 Average PH 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 TOTAL QC Status1561 356 314 366 728 1805 3113 5215 9618 7417 7808 7528 7873 8331 8422 9691 10004 9955 9933 9944 8533 6021 2520 2263 1998 1513 124469 Accepted21091 793 544 436 586 1015 1418 3248 5411 4330 6819 8335 9250 9747 9596 9377 9540 9105 8808 8957 7092 5203 2672 2761 2502 2152 117501 Accepted31747 1473 990 747 750 1159 1210 2070 3610 2840 4502 6261 7443 8258 8193 7874 7577 7471 6775 7123 3688 1860 1668 1809 2770 3169 93074 Accepted41566 816 823 1153 1368 2176 3423 7104 9579 8342 7741 7195 7325 7521 7482 8653 9416 9409 9783 9596 7372 5216 3641 2830 1810 1174 124576 Accepted5605 367 427 1011 1656 2998 3315 8244 10113 9179 8439 7172 7128 7259 7957 9143 8802 9808 10342 10075 8244 5725 4219 3132 2196 1413 129715 Accepted678800 453 357 658 1485 2620 3302 5061 6351 5706 7879 7582 7851 8432 8784 9660 9728 9870 10401 10136 8703 6071 4652 3745 2991 2057 129493 Accepted91092 690 470 394 388 1005 1556 2570 5403 3987 6894 8493 9452 9797 9377 9591 9331 9446 8925 9186 7430 5341 4162 3919 3483 2387 121596 Accepted101329 791 498 361 248 492 1015 2338 3281 2810 4957 6872 8235 9539 9785 9616 9542 8858 7735 8297 6426 4888 3500 2481 1703 982 105472 Accepted11553 355 331 436 869 1747 3030 6541 9812 8177 7661 7286 7245 7314 7582 8809 9576 9628 10180 9904 7984 5294 3779 2947 1860 1270 122089 Accepted12619 389 343 270 624 1549 3083 8145 9758 8952 7595 7450 7788 8401 8648 8605 6968 5931 4932 5432 2762 1814 1428 1160 1360 1420 101042 Accepted131145 826 856 1133 1995 2219 2909 4868 8857 6863 7552 6686 6509 6945 7119 8642 9607 9862 9681 9772 7592 5513 4130 3411 2218 1391 121666 Accepted14706 398 276 453 967 2114 3311 6356 9684 8020 8430 7612 7758 7831 8192 9047 9410 9498 10403 9951 8792 6100 4385 3371 2439 1613 129146 Accepted15751 581 560 1108 1947 1972 3378 5818 9707 7763 8070 7518 8161 8457 8966 9674 9978 9795 9740 9768 7718 6710 4506 3681 3038 1775 133609 Accepted161580 1282 1014 949 1055 2030 2408 3677 5544 4611 7141 8531 9438 9999 9867 10089 9636 9214 8545 8880 7363 5457 4390 3680 3292 2334 128515 Accepted171339 667 748 720 743 740 1379 2864 3134 2999 5075 7123 8418 9144 9364 9282 8831 8583 7715 8149 6429 4869 3814 2948 2077 1236 107242 Accepted1819926 674 842 1068 1044 2035 2825 4470 4480 4475 3860 4506 6200 8215 8379 9123 9118 9469 10181 9825 6359 3710 2500 2040 1585 1070 104679 Accepted20556 339 274 300 720 1632 2885 8441 9471 8956 8152 7865 7948 8154 8349 9399 9759 10042 10372 10207 7881 5447 3360 2628 2134 1777 127885 Accepted211045 921 845 1110 1690 2323 3672 4029 4746 4388 4102 4738 7731 8160 8359 9382 10119 10291 10725 10508 8501 6031 4677 3691 2469 1627 120984 Accepted22813 543 425 490 943 1954 3825 8135 9475 8805 8456 8679 9429 9925 9969 10551 10731 11297 11287 11292 9438 6782 4645 3991 3210 2228 147221 Accepted231387 729 1025 577 865 1384 2326 4498 5686 5092 7512 8957 10081 10565 10492 10401 10581 9887 9085 9486 7923 6150 4780 4134 3575 2480 135080 Accepted241412 886 1034 894 732 988 1649 2267 3830 3049 4746 6556 7943 8637 9008 8892 8253 7617 6792 7205 5785 3573 2436 2439 1846 1699 99914 Accepted251123 839 816 921 1711 2739 3879 9153 9853 9503 7840 7278 7389 7599 7963 9530 10556 10599 10710 10655 7951 5203 3874 2916 1923 1287 133652 Accepted26648 592 853 878 1193 2396 3363 7759 10286 9023 8283 7711 7624 7960 8273 9793 10512 10630 11213 10922 8379 6026 4646 3476 2514 1486 136494 Accepted27698 322 373 360 769 1879 3618 10551 10658 10605 8522 7965 7904 8011 8512 10051 10956 11326 11191 11259 8224 6003 4452 3242 2116 1526 139229 Accepted28880 414 396 670 910 1659 2623 4286 4392 4339 5130 6172 7463 7545 7867 9486 9920 10607 10821 10714 8604 6227 4897 3746 2738 1655 119108 Accepted999 660 617 699 1039 1785 2741 5508 7310 6409 6927 7283 7983 8470 8660 9374 9538 9528 9451 9489 7407 5249 3749 3058 2394 1709 122138Average March Peak Hour Average March Peak Hour Average March Massachusetts Highway Department5080: Monthly Hourly Volume for February 2019 Location ID: 5080 Seasonal Factor Group: U1‐EssexCounty: Essex Daily Factor Group:Functional Class 1 Axle Factor Group:U1‐EssexLocation: YANKEE DIVISION HIGHWAY Growth Factor Group:0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 Average PH 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 Average PH 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 TOTAL QC Status1595 348 343 460 1028 3278 6115 8700 8533 8617 6950 6682 6595 6780 7081 8107 9297 9368 9203 9286 6999 4488 3493 2492 1501 1421 119857 Accepted2665 371 306 435 1046 3289 6729 9471 8702 9087 7438 6734 7189 7171 7693 9297 9770 9139 9491 9315 7672 5209 3781 2740 1958 1311 127607 Accepted3659 393 362 460 1104 3429 6984 9752 9130 9441 7467 7098 7387 7479 7861 8925 9717 9188 9178 9183 7687 5746 4097 3100 2088 1411 130702 Accepted4770 481 408 457 999 2728 4333 4896 4336 4616 3424 3503 3569 3990 3965 4472 4679 4823 3772 4298 3331 2421 1749 1488 1249 1066 66909 Accepted5682 402 311 362 550 1230 2339 3197 4495 3846 5826 7570 8362 8904 8595 8489 8852 7553 7555 7554 6121 4559 3477 3189 2686 1917 107223 Accepted61188 712 422 377 357 800 1346 1925 2864 2395 4502 6123 8165 9202 9574 9364 9152 8043 7371 7707 6102 4531 3514 2399 1407 942 100382 Accepted7531 317 254 457 991 3384 6820 9428 8358 8893 6806 6336 6634 7091 7275 8777 9250 9249 8335 8792 6261 4366 3065 2356 1504 1041 118886 Accepted8587 334 318 450 1059 3420 7019 9775 8592 9184 7135 6775 6877 7070 7419 8789 9468 9696 9591 9644 7131 4941 3637 2736 1956 1233 126008 Accepted9613 318 320 423 1131 3467 7225 9597 8996 9297 7366 7026 7296 7685 7744 9227 9819 9897 9815 9856 8066 5313 3743 2825 1901 1264 131077 Accepted10615 371 302 464 1160 3476 7111 9232 8931 9082 7586 7275 7459 7465 7941 8974 9445 9242 8989 9116 7671 5500 3965 3076 2059 1595 129904 Accepted11876 468 1016 2256 2387 5381 7591 9640 8240 8940 6907 7520 8006 7883 8443 9416 9448 9279 9248 9264 8640 6157 4357 3168 2990 2033 141350 Accepted121078 676 463 363 570 1428 2630 3837 5291 4564 7252 9703 10116 10287 10192 11642 10856 9528 8896 9212 7164 5740 4709 3740 2977 1959 131097 Accepted13141516171819202122232425262728738 433 402 580 1032 2943 5520 7454 7206 7330 6555 6862 7305 7584 7815 8790 9146 8750 8454 8602 6904 4914 3632 2776 2023 1433 119250Average March Peak Hour Average March Peak Hour Average March Massachusetts Highway Department5080: Monthly Hourly Volume for February 2022 Location ID: 595 Seasonal Factor Group: U1‐EssexCounty: Essex Daily Factor Group:Functional Class 1 Axle Factor Group:U1‐EssexLocation: YANKEE DIVISION HIGHWAY Growth Factor Group:0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 Average PH 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 Average PH 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 TOTAL QC Status1819 484 397 477 1142 3634 6207 7481 7603 7542 7484 7542 7890 8412 8699 9479 9900 9742 9393 9568 8426 6125 4192 3568 3078 2221 134395 Accepted21391 828 568 432 572 1291 2291 3706 5708 4707 7134 8325 9319 9646 9638 9456 9437 9052 8680 8866 7084 5241 4213 3806 2955 2131 122904 Accepted341005 421 343 383 998 3778 6935 9184 8682 8933 7509 7101 7284 7633 7592 9055 9630 9366 9392 9379 7035 5457 3632 2866 1851 1197 128329 Accepted5639 376 366 427 1145 4394 7303 9586 9114 9350 8071 7330 7460 7589 8200 9441 9231 9608 9772 9690 7986 5607 4154 3313 2205 1418 134735 Accepted678923 482 398 473 1189 4073 6893 9465 9068 9267 7750 7543 7993 8531 8882 9913 9826 9684 9736 9710 8401 6055 4570 3721 2924 2068 140561 Accepted91167 775 475 390 511 1242 2348 3735 5626 4681 7225 8674 9576 9749 9857 9551 9272 9265 8508 8887 7343 5391 4269 3981 3468 2362 124760 Accepted101342 813 495 340 273 602 1302 2086 3342 2714 4967 7024 8370 9421 9686 9550 9470 8852 7659 8256 6434 4855 3524 2462 1715 950 105534 Accepted11525 361 325 407 1090 4430 7210 9679 8877 9278 7402 7004 7158 7399 7720 9056 9680 9407 9980 9694 7804 5265 3760 2873 1865 1223 130500 Accepted12627 370 365 492 1175 4196 6654 8929 8791 8860 7312 7171 7899 8391 8806 8264 5991 5273 4641 4957 2595 1582 1205 976 806 854 103365 Accepted13509 414 393 431 1027 3311 5822 8505 8588 8547 7336 6617 6465 6909 7090 8723 9477 9508 9207 9358 7341 5397 4032 3351 2236 1434 124123 Accepted14690 431 366 503 1133 4223 7230 9563 8380 8972 8137 7565 7766 7594 8261 9110 9402 9400 9707 9554 8495 6066 4323 3334 2395 1587 135661 Accepted15878 481 402 441 1143 3896 6960 9840 9066 9453 8052 7592 8372 8335 9101 9765 9851 9429 9286 9358 8233 6904 4581 3757 2976 1939 141280 Accepted161244 763 511 385 537 1255 2398 3995 5753 4874 7513 8913 9899 9996 9946 10006 9843 9280 7403 8342 7308 5406 4335 3666 3265 2305 125925 Accepted171385 823 464 312 286 593 1170 1966 3146 2556 5087 7294 8542 9248 9419 9505 9090 8695 7671 8183 6499 5030 3888 2924 2107 1296 106440 Accepted18758 425 379 472 664 1909 3205 4645 5049 4847 5227 6079 6980 7666 7527 7896 7773 7287 6937 7112 5560 4328 3299 2613 1623 1123 99424 Accepted19552 368 371 512 1288 3887 6032 8233 8677 8455 7971 7758 7730 8415 8544 9446 9027 9154 9481 9318 7856 5665 4054 3361 2044 1288 131714 Accepted20649 407 351 497 1210 3885 6111 8152 8570 8361 7853 7771 8167 8399 8563 9700 9779 9844 9891 9868 7780 5517 4087 2989 2024 1280 133476 Accepted21736 445 462 580 897 2734 5582 7516 8394 7955 7570 7446 7541 7929 8123 8935 9358 9411 9608 9510 7834 5615 4405 3572 2352 1551 128596 Accepted22850 513 428 479 1166 3789 6442 8730 8596 8663 8006 8164 9117 9430 9420 9668 9864 10023 9909 9966 8520 6351 4381 3608 3065 2148 142667 Accepted231352 758 548 405 535 1264 2426 3732 5290 4511 6945 8444 9452 9857 9913 9865 9937 9220 8455 8838 7519 5790 4420 3943 3426 2464 125960 Accepted241374 901 510 321 277 593 1153 1811 2812 2312 4270 6080 7572 8040 8366 8256 7907 7355 6499 6927 5477 4319 3122 2230 1539 1110 91894 Accepted25545 323 335 441 1159 4275 7331 9595 8372 8984 7239 6849 6886 7334 7569 9034 9783 9664 9587 9626 7186 4872 3619 2813 1778 1181 127770 Accepted26600 378 368 453 1195 4252 7321 9236 8854 9045 7516 7158 7235 7605 7969 9236 9706 9568 9780 9674 7562 5522 4290 3320 2336 1380 132840 Accepted27693 447 438 568 1283 3934 6660 8443 8819 8631 7727 7437 7490 7613 8056 9438 9939 9945 9911 9928 7520 5526 4184 3029 2042 1301 132443 Accepted28697 446 498 592 1132 2885 4891 6689 7162 6926 7526 7200 7001 7174 7554 9033 8940 9695 9631 9663 7922 5866 4534 3563 2491 1592 124714 Accepted878 529 422 449 921 2973 5115 6980 7294 7137 7153 7443 7967 8333 8580 9255 9285 9109 8829 8969 7269 5350 3963 3186 2343 1576 125200Average March Peak Hour Average March Peak Hour Average March Massachusetts Highway Department595: Monthly Hourly Volume for February 2019 Location ID: 595 Seasonal Factor Group: U1‐EssexCounty: Essex Daily Factor Group:Functional Class 1 Axle Factor Group:U1‐EssexLocation: YANKEE DIVISION HIGHWAY Growth Factor Group:0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00Average PH 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00Average PH 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 TOTAL QC Status1582 364 332 442 1089 3271 6359 8783 8698 8741 7080 6641 6611 6847 7376 7852 9321 9343 9311 9327 6954 4604 3406 2515 1441 1439 120661 Accepted2671 391 350 453 1081 3292 6777 9353 8604 8979 7372 6651 7269 7388 7605 8977 9725 9499 9340 9420 7471 5105 3717 2858 1923 1415 127287 Accepted3737 417 389 466 1117 3423 6723 8971 8682 8827 7186 6892 7299 7444 7770 8706 9522 8926 8845 8886 7577 5557 4066 3016 2124 1413 127268 Accepted4800 497 441 444 976 2654 4393 4926 4240 4583 3338 3263 3624 3947 4053 4503 4484 4704 3558 4131 3110 2229 1593 1334 1167 1017 65295 Accepted5684 409 319 341 571 1186 2265 3328 4689 4009 5930 7595 8709 9096 8515 8639 9199 7907 7966 7937 6580 4846 3757 3113 2759 1956 110359 Accepted61166 708 421 373 323 718 1372 1775 2867 2321 4328 6253 8049 8819 9130 8983 8834 7942 7267 7605 6192 4672 3678 2396 1531 964 98761 Accepted7538 333 299 433 989 3270 6670 9072 7816 8444 6802 6365 6442 6874 7164 8472 9009 8463 7713 8088 6020 4324 2970 2232 1540 1008 114818 Accepted8543 360 318 430 1113 3313 6667 8847 8182 8515 7100 6710 6915 7087 7424 8608 9289 9569 9294 9432 6968 4864 3459 2653 1903 1182 122798 Accepted9556 349 340 448 1087 3424 7005 9306 8776 9041 7281 6965 7315 7578 7656 9261 9471 9543 9425 9484 7879 5273 3892 2939 1967 1271 129007 Accepted10671 402 328 435 1179 3419 7014 9643 8182 8913 7564 7118 7351 7580 8033 9259 9569 9567 7999 8783 7819 5484 4018 3089 2175 1485 129383 Accepted11736 492 410 511 1033 3245 6632 9084 8444 8764 7354 7414 8105 8649 9003 9895 9914 9804 9576 9690 8431 6243 4279 3455 2835 2015 137559 Accepted121074 694 487 342 516 1348 2597 3780 5443 4612 7492 9564 10216 10055 10419 9949 10083 9287 8322 8805 6925 5722 4620 3731 2989 2017 127672 Accepted131082 828 485 324 322 647 1291 1844 2779 2312 4122 5544 7091 7558 7695 7698 7451 6634 5944 6289 4239 2581 2060 1872 2282 1475 83848 Accepted14608 355 327 425 1007 3031 6164 7674 7579 7627 6647 6537 6910 7132 7432 8673 9479 9174 9013 9094 6578 4642 3299 2569 1780 1220 118255 Accepted15628 391 342 457 1135 3419 6535 8497 7789 8143 7086 6926 7038 7391 7584 9023 9671 9383 9353 9368 6993 4803 3560 2626 1667 1206 123503 Accepted16587 339 333 459 1037 3451 7062 9227 8566 8897 7410 6923 7075 7499 7641 9066 9460 9608 9410 9509 7248 5140 3859 2825 2060 1293 127578 Accepted17646 392 353 461 1165 3504 7074 9404 8449 8927 7633 7109 7702 7818 8259 9561 10139 10110 9488 9799 7682 5413 4009 3133 2123 1420 133047 Accepted18703 416 362 470 1055 3126 6132 8296 7569 7933 6933 7413 8266 8803 9387 10142 9713 9523 9543 9533 7389 6287 4360 3220 2661 1978 133747 Accepted191091 628 476 399 553 1226 2336 3550 5277 4414 7214 8797 9855 10412 9433 9442 9161 8624 7230 7927 6484 5024 4009 3290 2627 2039 119177 Accepted201139 742 440 310 291 677 1281 2002 2981 2492 4889 7066 8732 9641 9616 9028 8848 8225 7632 7929 6305 4746 3562 2728 1763 1260 103904 Accepted21669 428 290 393 766 2045 4329 5465 5868 5667 6781 8174 9403 9739 9929 8736 9862 9041 8789 8915 6781 5061 3655 2711 1652 1116 121683 Accepted22577 363 313 426 1097 3492 6652 8471 8459 8465 7543 7496 7820 8328 8614 8496 8853 9056 8935 8996 6840 4637 3309 2602 1826 1233 125438 Accepted23581 363 329 474 1085 3445 6702 8765 8519 8642 7862 8213 8641 9438 9336 9756 9857 9832 9581 9707 8396 5703 3828 2977 1983 1301 136967 Accepted24709 434 387 495 1092 3485 6562 8684 8695 8690 8036 8009 8620 9224 9529 10209 10163 9507 9530 9519 8678 6880 5026 3734 2604 1831 142123 Accepted25262728711 444 355 408 867 2564 5064 6750 6686 6998 6439 6786 7402 7774 7944 8517 8843 8531 8123 8674 6622 4794 3520 2705 1975 1382 120006Average March Peak Hour Average March Peak Hour Average March Massachusetts Highway Department595: Monthly Hourly Volume for February 2022 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SCHEDULES NEWBURYPORT/ROCKPORT LINE 2021 Fall/Winter Schedule Effective October 11, 2021 B: Due to construction activities for the Gloucester Drawbridge Replacement project, bus shuttles will replace train service between Rockport, Gloucester, West Gloucester (and Manchester on designated outbound trips) on the Rockport Line. Bikes are not allowed on board buses. Monday to Friday (except when Storm Service is operating) Inbound to Boston AM PM ZONE STATION TRAIN #140 100 142 102 144 104 146 106 148 108 150 192 110 152 112 154 114 156 198 116 158 118 160 120 162 122 124 164 Bikes Allowed 8 Rockport -B 4:58 -B 6:03 -B 7:03 -B 8:03 -B 9:03 --B 10:33 -B 12:03 -B 1:33 --B 3:03 ---B 5:36 -B 7:36 B 8:40 - 7 Gloucester -B 5:05 -B 6:10 -B 7:10 -B 8:10 -B 9:10 --B 10:40 -B 12:10 -B 1:40 --B 3:10 ---B 5:43 -B 7:43 B 8:47 - 7 West Gloucester -5:21 -6:26 -7:26 -8:26 -9:26 --10:56 -12:26 -1:56 --3:26 ---5:59 -7:59 9:03 - 6 Manchester -5:28 -6:33 -7:33 -8:33 -9:33 --11:03 -12:33 -2:03 --3:33 ---6:06 -8:06 9:10 - 5 Beverly Farms -5:34 -6:39 -7:39 -8:39 -f 9:39 --f 11:09 -f 12:39 -f 2:09 --f 3:39 ---f 6:12 -f 8:12 f 9:16 - 4 Montserrat -5:40 -6:45 -7:45 -8:45 -f 9:45 --f 11:15 -f 12:45 -f 2:15 --f 3:45 ---f 6:18 -f 8:18 f 9:22 - 8 Newburyport 4:49 -5:54 -6:54 -7:54 -8:54 -9:54 --11:24 -12:54 -2:24 --3:54 -5:07 -6:57 --9:39 7 Rowley 4:54 -5:59 -6:59 -7:59 -8:59 -f 9:59 --f 11:29 -f 12:59 -f 2:29 --f 3:59 -f 5:12 -f 7:02 --f 9:44 6 Ipswich 5:00 -6:05 -7:05 -8:05 -9:05 -10:05 --11:35 -1:05 -2:35 --4:05 -5:18 -7:08 --9:50 5 Hamilton/Wenham 5:06 -6:11 -7:11 -8:11 -9:11 -f 10:11 --f 11:41 -f 1:11 -f 2:41 --f 4:11 -f 5:31 -f 7:14 --f 9:56 5 North Beverly 5:10 -6:15 -7:15 -8:15 -9:15 -f 10:15 --f 11:45 -f 1:15 -f 2:45 --f 4:15 -f 5:35 -f 7:18 --f 10:00 4 Beverly 5:15 5:45 6:20 6:50 7:20 7:50 8:20 8:50 9:20 9:50 10:20 10:50 11:20 11:50 12:50 1:20 2:20 2:50 3:20 3:50 4:20 5:14 5:40 6:23 7:23 8:23 9:27 10:05 3 Salem 5:19 5:49 6:24 6:54 7:24 7:54 8:24 8:54 9:24 9:54 10:24 10:54 11:24 11:54 12:54 1:24 2:24 2:54 3:24 3:54 4:24 5:18 5:44 6:27 7:27 8:27 9:31 10:09 3 Swampscott 5:26 5:56 6:31 7:01 7:31 8:01 8:31 9:01 9:31 10:01 10:31 11:01 11:31 12:01 1:01 1:31 2:31 3:01 3:31 4:01 4:31 5:25 5:51 6:34 7:34 8:34 9:38 10:16 2 Lynn 5:29 5:59 6:34 7:04 7:34 8:04 8:34 9:04 9:34 10:04 10:34 11:04 11:34 12:04 1:04 1:34 2:34 3:04 3:34 4:04 4:34 5:28 5:54 6:37 7:37 8:37 9:41 10:19 2 River Works f 5:32 f 6:02 f 6:37 f 7:07 -f 8:07 f 8:37 ---------f 2:37 f 3:07 f 3:37 f 4:07 f 4:37 f 5:31 f 5:57 f 6:40 f 7:40 --f 10:22 1A Chelsea 5:39 6:09 6:45 7:15 7:44 8:15 8:45 9:14 f 9:43 f 10:13 f 10:43 f 11:13 f 11:43 f 12:13 f 1:13 f 1:43 f 2:44 f 3:14 f 3:44 f 4:14 f 4:44 f 5:38 f 6:04 f 6:47 f 7:47 f 8:46 f 9:50 f 10:29 1A North Station 5:53 6:24 7:00 7:31 7:59 8:31 9:00 9:29 9:58 10:28 10:57 11:26 11:58 12:27 1:28 1:57 2:59 3:28 3:57 4:29 4:58 5:53 6:19 7:02 8:01 9:01 10:05 10:43 Monday to Friday (except when Storm Service is operating) Outbound from Boston AM PM ZONE STATION TRAIN #141 101 143 103 145 105 191 147 107 149 109 151 111 197 153 113 155 115 157 117 159 119 161 121 163 123 165 125 167 Bikes Allowed 1A North Station 5:35 6:35 7:35 7:50 8:35 9:05 9:35 10:05 10:35 11:35 12:05 1:05 1:35 2:05 2:35 3:05 3:35 4:05 4:35 5:05 5:35 6:05 6:40 7:20 8:05 8:50 9:35 11:00 Board Rockport Train 125 and change trains at Salem for a Newburyport connection 1A Chelsea f 5:46 f 6:46 f 7:46 -f 8:46 f 9:16 f 9:46 f 10:16 f 10:46 f 11:46 f 12:16 f 1:16 f 1:46 f 2:16 f 2:46 f 3:16 3:46 4:16 4:46 5:16 5:46 6:16 6:51 f 7:31 f 8:16 f 9:01 f 9:46 f 11:11 2 River Works f 5:53 f 6:53 f 7:53 ---------f 1:54 -f 2:54 f 3:24 f 3:54 f 4:24 -f 5:24 f 5:54 -f 6:59 f 7:39 ---f 11:19 2 Lynn 5:56 6:56 7:56 -8:55 9:25 9:55 10:25 10:55 11:55 12:25 1:25 1:56 2:25 2:56 3:26 3:56 4:26 4:55 5:26 5:56 6:25 7:01 7:41 8:25 9:10 9:55 11:21 3 Swampscott 5:59 6:59 7:59 -8:58 9:28 9:58 10:28 10:58 11:58 12:28 1:28 1:59 2:28 2:59 3:29 3:59 4:29 4:58 5:29 5:59 6:28 7:04 7:44 8:28 9:13 9:58 11:24 3 Salem 6:06 7:06 8:06 8:16 9:05 9:35 10:05 10:35 11:05 12:05 12:35 1:35 2:06 2:35 3:06 3:36 4:06 4:36 5:05 5:36 6:06 6:35 7:11 7:51 8:35 9:20 10:05 11:31 11:40 4 Beverly 6:10 7:10 8:10 8:20 9:09 9:39 10:10 10:39 11:09 12:09 12:39 1:39 2:10 2:40 3:10 3:40 4:10 4:40 5:09 5:40 6:10 6:39 7:15 7:55 8:39 9:24 10:09 11:35 11:44 5 North Beverly f 6:14 -f 8:14 -f 9:13 --f 10:43 -f 12:13 -f 1:43 --f 3:14 -4:14 -5:13 -6:14 -7:19 -8:43 -10:13 -11:48 5 Hamilton/Wenham f 6:18 -f 8:18 -f 9:17 --f 10:47 -f 12:17 -f 1:47 --f 3:18 -4:19 -5:18 -6:19 -7:24 -8:47 -10:17 -11:52 6 Ipswich 6:24 -8:24 -9:23 --10:53 -12:23 -1:53 --3:24 -4:25 -5:25 -6:26 -7:30 -8:53 -10:23 -11:58 7 Rowley f 6:30 -f 8:30 -f 9:29 --f 10:59 -f 12:29 -f 1:59 --f 3:30 -4:31 -5:31 -6:32 -7:36 -f 8:59 -f 10:29 -f 12:04 8 Newburyport 6:39 -8:39 -9:39 --11:09 -12:39 -2:09 --3:40 -4:41 -5:41 -6:42 -7:46 -9:09 -10:39 -12:14 4 Montserrat -f 7:14 ---f 9:43 --f 11:13 -f 12:43 -f 2:14 --f 3:44 -4:44 -5:44 -6:43 -f 7:59 -f 9:28 -f 11:39 - 5 Beverly Farms -f 7:20 ---f 9:49 --f 11:19 -f 12:49 -f 2:20 --f 3:50 -4:51 -5:51 -6:50 -f 8:05 -f 9:34 -f 11:45 - 6 Manchester -B 7:26 ---B 9:55 --B 11:25 -B 12:55 -B 2:26 --B 3:56 -B 4:57 -5:57 -B 6:56 -B 8:12 -B 9:40 -B 11:51 - 7 West Gloucester -B 7:46 ---B 10:15 --B 11:45 -B 1:15 -B 2:46 --B 4:16 -B 5:17 -B 6:03 -B 7:16 -B 8:32 -B 10:00 -B 12:11 - 7 Gloucester -B 7:54 ---B 10:23 --B 11:53 -B 1:23 -B 2:54 --B 4:24 -B 5:25 -B 6:16 -B 7:24 -B 8:40 -B 10:08 -B 12:11 - 8 Rockport -B 7:54 ---B 10:23 --B 11:53 -B 1:23 -B 2:54 --B 4:24 -B 5:25 -B 6:23 -B 7:24 -B 8:40 -B 10:08 -B 12:19 - Weekend & Storm Service Inbound to Boston AM PM ZONE STATION SATURDAY TRAIN #1150 1100 1152 1102 1154 1104 1156 1106 1158 1108 1160 1110 1162 1112 1164 1114 1166 1116 SUNDAY TRAIN # 2150 2100 2152 2102 2154 2104 2156 2106 2158 2108 2160 2110 2162 2112 2164 2114 2166 2116 Bikes Allowed 8 Rockport -B 5:50 -B 7:50 -B 9:50 -B 11:50 -B 1:50 -B 3:50 -B 5:50 -B 7:50 -B 9:50 7 Gloucester -B 5:57 -B 7:57 -B 9:57 -B 11:57 -B 1:57 -B 3:57 -B 5:57 -B 7:57 -B 9:57 7 West Gloucester -6:13 -8:13 -10:13 -12:13 -2:13 -4:13 -6:13 -8:13 -10:13 6 Manchester -6:20 -8:20 -10:20 -12:20 -2:20 -4:20 -6:20 -8:20 -10:20 5 Beverly Farms -f 6:26 -f 8:26 -f 10:26 -f 12:26 -f 2:26 -f 4:26 -f 6:26 -f 8:26 -f 10:26 4 Montserrat -f 6:32 -f 8:32 -f 10:32 -f 12:32 -f 2:32 -f 4:32 -f 6:32 -f 8:32 -f 10:32 8 Newburyport 5:10 -7:10 -9:10 -11:10 -1:10 -3:10 -5:10 -7:10 -9:10 - 7 Rowley 5:15 -7:15 -9:15 -11:15 -1:15 -3:15 -5:15 -7:15 -9:15 - 6 Ipswich 5:21 -7:21 -9:21 -11:21 -1:21 -3:21 -5:21 -7:21 -9:21 - 5 Hamilton/Wenham 5:27 -7:27 -9:27 -11:27 -1:27 -3:27 -5:27 -7:27 -9:27 - 5 North Beverly f 5:31 -f 7:31 -f 9:31 -f 11:31 -f 1:31 -f 3:31 -f 5:31 -f 7:31 -f 9:31 - 4 Beverly 5:37 6:37 7:37 8:37 9:37 10:37 11:37 12:37 1:37 2:37 3:37 4:37 5:37 6:37 7:37 8:37 9:37 10:37 3 Salem 5:41 6:41 7:41 8:41 9:41 10:41 11:41 12:41 1:41 2:41 3:41 4:41 5:41 6:41 7:41 8:41 9:41 10:41 3 Swampscott 5:48 6:48 7:48 8:48 9:48 10:48 11:48 12:48 1:48 2:48 3:48 4:48 5:48 6:48 7:48 8:48 9:48 10:48 2 Lynn 5:51 6:51 7:51 8:51 9:51 10:51 11:51 12:51 1:51 2:51 3:51 4:51 5:51 6:51 7:51 8:51 9:51 10:51 1A Chelsea f 6:00 f 7:00 f 8:00 f 9:00 f 10:00 f 11:00 f 12:00 f 1:00 f 2:00 f 3:00 f 4:00 f 5:00 f 6:00 f 7:00 f 8:00 f 9:00 f 10:00 f 11:00 1A North Station 6:14 7:15 8:14 9:15 10:14 11:15 12:14 1:15 2:14 3:15 4:14 5:15 6:14 7:15 8:14 9:15 10:14 11:15 Weekend & Storm Service Outbound from Boston AM PM ZONE STATION SATURDAY TRAIN #1151 1101 1153 1103 1155 1105 1157 1107 1159 1109 1161 1111 1163 1113 1165 1115 1167 1117 SUNDAY TRAIN # 2151 2101 2153 2103 2155 2105 2157 2107 2159 2109 2161 2111 2163 2113 2165 2115 2167 2117 Bikes Allowed 1A North Station 5:30 6:30 7:30 8:30 9:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 1:30 2:30 3:30 4:30 5:30 6:30 7:30 8:30 10:00 11:00 1A Chelsea f 5:41 f 6:41 f 7:41 f 8:41 f 9:41 f 10:41 f 11:41 f 12:41 f 1:41 f 2:41 f 3:41 f 4:41 f 5:41 f 6:41 f 7:41 f 8:41 f 10:11 f 11:11 2 Lynn 5:50 6:50 7:50 8:50 9:50 10:50 11:50 12:50 1:50 2:50 3:50 4:50 5:50 6:50 7:50 8:50 10:20 11:20 3 Swampscott 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 1:53 2:53 3:53 4:53 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 10:23 11:23 3 Salem 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:30 11:30 4 Beverly 6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:04 11:04 12:04 1:04 2:04 3:04 4:04 5:04 6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:34 11:34 5 North Beverly f 6:08 -f 8:08 -f 10:08 -f 12:08 -f 2:08 -f 4:08 -f 6:08 -f 8:08 -f 10:38 - 5 Hamilton/Wenham 6:12 -8:12 -10:12 -12:12 -2:12 -4:12 -6:12 -8:12 -10:42 - 6 Ipswich 6:18 -8:18 -10:18 -12:18 -2:18 -4:18 -6:18 -8:18 -10:48 - 7 Rowley 6:24 -8:24 -10:24 -12:24 -2:24 -4:24 -6:24 -8:24 -10:54 - 8 Newburyport 6:35 -8:35 -10:35 -12:35 -2:35 -4:35 -6:35 -8:35 -11:05 - 4 Montserrat -f 7:08 -f 9:08 -f 11:08 -f 1:08 -f 3:08 -f 5:08 -f 7:08 -f 9:08 -f 11:38 5 Beverly Farms -f 7:14 -f 9:14 -f 11:14 -f 1:14 -f 3:14 -f 5:14 -f 7:14 -f 9:14 -f 11:44 6 Manchester -B 7:20 -B 9:20 -B 11:20 -B 1:20 -B 3:20 -B 5:20 -B 7:20 -B 9:20 -B 11:50 7 West Gloucester -B 7:40 -B 9:40 -B 11:40 -B 1:40 -B 3:40 -B 5:40 -B 7:40 -B 9:40 -B 12:10 7 Gloucester -B 7:48 -B 9:48 -B 11:48 -B 1:48 -B 3:48 -B 5:48 -B 7:48 -B 9:48 -B 12:18 8 Rockport -B 7:48 -B 9:48 -B 11:48 -B 1:48 -B 3:48 -B 5:48 -B 7:48 -B 9:48 -B 12:18 Keep in Mind: This schedule will be effective from October 11, 2021 and will replace the schedule of June 28, 2021. Holiday Service On Thursday, November 25th 2021 (Thanksgiving Day), Saturday, December 25th 2021 (Christmas Day), and Saturday, January 1st 2022 (New Year’s day), all lines will operate on a weekend schedule. On Friday, November 26th 2021, Friday, December 24th 2021 (Christmas Eve) and Friday, December 31st 2021 (New Year’s Eve), all lines will operate on a regular weekday schedule. For all holiday schedules, please check MBTA.com/holidays or call 617-222-3200. Masks are federally required on board and in station. Visit MBTA.com/covid19 for the latest updates. Schedules may change in the event of severe weather During weather events, the symbols below will communicate service level and impact on passengers. Service level for the following day will be announced mid afternoon on the prior day. REGULAR SERVICE Trains will operate on a normal schedule. STORM SERVICE Trains will operate on a weekend schedule. NO SERVICE No passenger service on Commuter Rail. Times in purple with “f “ indicate a flag stop: Passengers must tell the conductor that they wish to leave. Passengers waiting to board must be visible on the platform for the train to stop. Bikes: Bicycles are allowed on trains with the bicycle symbol shown below the train number. Connect to a different train for continued service outbound. High level platform and bridge plate available. Visit mbta.com/accessibility for more information. Visit MBTA.com Customer Service 617-222-3200 Follow @MBTA_CR Download the mTicket App AD101121V1 BreakheartReservation LynnfieldCountry Club BirchPond wburyport Commuter RailRockport/NeSWAMPSCOTT MELROSE WAKE- FIELD SAUGUS LYNNFIELD LYNN SWAMPSCOTT PEABODY MARBLEHEAD DANVERS BEVERLY BreakheartReservation Lynn Woods LynnfieldCountry Club Colonial Club SalemCountry Club HighlandPark JacksonPark MemorialPark BellevueGolf Club PearceLake SilverLake HawkesPond BreedsPond BirchPond FlaxPond SluicePond SpringPond BrownsPond SuntaugLake WinonaPond PillingsPond GriswoldPond Salem Harbor Beverly Harbor L ynn Fells P k w y .Laurel St.Ma i n S t . Walnut S t .East S t .Waverly Ave.Howard St. Upham St. Holyoke St.Cabot St.Sohie r Rd . Elli o t S t . Elliot St.Rantoul St.Essex St.B r im b a l l A v e . Balch St . C a b o t S t . Colon St. Bridge S t .Lothrop St.Foster St.Dodge St. C o r n i n g S t . Purchase St. Holten St. Ma p l e S t .Summer St.Pi c k e r i n g S t .Locust St.Bur ley S t .Liberty St.An d o v e r S t . Endicott St.Water St.Lowell S t .Pulaski St.Tremont St. Nort h S t . M a r g i n S t .Highland Ave.Foster St.Central St.Lynn St.Summit St.L ynnfield St. Mai n S t .Canal St.W ashington St.Lowel l S t . Lowel l S t .Jefferson Ave.Forest St. Wil s o n S t . Forest St. Warre n S t .BroadwayCh e s t n u t S t .Eastern Ave.Boston St.Humphrey S t .Paradise Rd.S a l em S t .Loring A ve.Walnut S t .Essex St.G a r f i e l d A v e . Puritan St.Lincoln Ave.Lyn n f i e l d S t .Jenness St. Euclid Ave.LynnwaySwampscott Rd.Parkland Ave.Boston St.Union St.Myrtle St.Humphrey St.Atlantic Ave.Lafayette St.Derby St. Ocean Ave.W Shore Dr.Villa g e S t . Be a c o n S t .W Shore Dr.Pleasant S t. Atlantic A ve. Lafayette St.Bridge St.Fort Ave.S u m m e r S t .Walnu t S t . L y n n f i e l d S t .Main S t . W aln u t S t .Central St . Water St.Farm S t .Walnu t S t .Summer St.Salem St. Water St.Lake S t .Vine St.Summer St.Appleton St. Main St.Central St.Kernwood StHerrick St.Western Ave.N. Fran k l i n S t . SquareOne Mall Saugus Plaza EndicottPlaza LibertyTree Mall GoodwinsCircleGoodwinsCircle NSMCUnion Hospital/AtlanticareMedical Center CentennialPark Vinnin Square WyomaSquare Exit 47 Exit 21 Exit 20 Exit 19 Exit 18 Exit 48 Exit 49 Exit 64Exit 37 Exit 63 Exit 66 Exit 38 Exit 39 Exit 41 Exit 42 Exit 43 Exit 40 B B B 451 451 441 441 441 448 442 442 442 435 435 435 435 435 459456 450/450W 465 429 426/426W 436 436 436 436 435 429 429 430 430131 428 430 429 439 439 455 Centenni al D r Saugus IronWorks SaugusCenter WakefieldHigh School North Beverly Cummings Center BeverlyHospital City Hall FranklinSt. Northshore MallNorthshore Mall MONTSERRATBEVERLY DEPOT NORTH BEVERLY To Rockport To Newburyport 1 1 1 128 128 22 22 221A 9795 62 62 35 128 95 128 95 1 129 114 114 129 129 129 22 62 114 114 1A 129 107 129 129 129 Was h i n g t o n S t . Fr a n k l i n S t . LYNNLYNN SALEM To/from HaymarketTo/from Haymarket Buffum St Sils b e e St Mt. Vernon StExch a n g e S t Broad S tUnion StWa s h i n g t o n St Lynn w a y Ma r k e t StStateOxford StWill o w St Central Ave Spring StAndrew StFarrar S tTo Ne w b ury p ort or Rockp ort Munroe StTo Ne w b ury p ort or Rockp ort To North StationBoston435 435 435 435 436 436 436 P Commuter Rail StationBusway and Park-n-Ride Entrance(also, access to Munroe St ) Commuter Rail Station Central Square Entrance Lynn Busway: MBTA buses426, 429, 435, 436, 439,441, 442, 455(see signs for exactboarding locations) rail stati o n pl atf or m commuterLost & Found 617-222-5263 mbta.com 617-222-3200 617-222-5146 (TTY) Effective Aug 29, 2021 435•436 435 Salem Depot - Central Sq, Lynn or Neptune Towers 436 Liberty Tree Mall - Central Sq, Lynn Information in this timetable is subject to change without notice. Traffic conditions and weather can affect running time. ScheduleChange Fare Local Bus Bus + Bus Bus + Subway CharlieCard $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $2.40 CharlieTicket $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $4.10* Cash-on-Board $1.70 $3.40 $2.40 $4.10 Student/Youth**$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 Senior/TAP***$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 FREE FARES: Children 11 and under ride free when accompanied by a paying customer;Blind Access CharlieCard holders ride free and if using a guide, the guide rides free. * Transfers Subway to Silver Line SL4 or SL5 pay $2.40 ** Requires Student CharlieCard or Youth CharlieCard. Student CharlieCards available to students through par�cipa�ng middle and high schools. Youth CharlieCards available through community partners across Greater Boston. *** Requires Senior/TAP CharlieCard, available to Medicare cardholders, seniors 65+, and persons with disabili�es. Subway ++ Holidays Fall 2021/Winter 2022 SaturdayChristmas Eve; NY Eve; MLK Day; President’s Day SundayLabor Day; Thanksgiving; Christmas Day; NY Day All MBTA buses accessible to persons with disabilities Weekday - InboundSalem Depot CentralSquareLibertyTreeN. ShoreMall CentennialPark NeptuneTowersMain St.Peabody Goodwins Circle NeptuneTowers CentralSquare Goodwins Circle CentennialPark Main St.Peabody N. ShoreMall LibertyTree Salem Depot Weekday - OutboundSaturday - OutboundSaturday - InboundSunday - Inbound Sunday - Outbound N. ShoreMallNeptuneTowersCentralSquareMain St.Peabodyl LibertyTree CentralSquareLibertyTreeN. ShoreMall Main St.Peabody NeptuneTowers 436 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 6:40A 7:03A 7:17A 435 6:30A 6:43A 6:52A 6:57A ..... ..... 7:30 7:41 436 ..... ..... 6:54 ..... 7:06A 7:14 7:40 ..... 436 ..... ..... 7:11 ..... 7:23 7:31 7:57 ..... 435 7:30 7:43 7:52 7:57 ..... ..... 8:30 8:41 436 ..... ..... 7:55 ..... 8:07 8:14 8:38 ..... 435 8:25 8:38 8:47 8:52 ..... ..... 9:24 9:35 436 ..... ..... 8:45 ..... 8:57 9:03 9:25 ..... 435 9:20 9:33 9:42 9:47 ..... ..... 10:18 10:29 436 ..... 9:49 9:55 ..... 10:08 10:14 10:37 ..... 435 10:15 10:28 10:38 10:44 ..... ..... 11:15 11:26 436 ..... 10:35 10:41 ..... 10:54 11:00 11:23 ..... 435 11:10 11:23 11:33 11:39 ..... ..... 12:11P 12:22P 436 ..... 11:55 12:01P ..... 12:14P 12:20P 12:45 ..... 435 12:05P 12:18P 12:29 12:36P ..... ..... 1:08 1:19 436 ..... 12:40 12:46 ..... 12:59 1:05 1:30 ..... 435 1:00 1:13 1:24 1:31 ..... ..... 2:03 2:14 436 ms 2:35 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 436 ..... 1:53 2:00 ..... 2:15 2:22 2:53 ..... 435 1:55 2:08 2:19 2:26 ..... ..... 3:00 3:11 436 bs 2:45 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 436 ..... 2:47 2:57 ..... 3:12 3:19 3:50 ..... 435 2:50 3:03 3:15 3:23 ..... ..... 4:06 4:17 435 3:55 4:08 4:20 4:28 ..... ..... 5:12 ..... 436 ..... 4:23 4:33 ..... 4:48 4:55 5:27 ..... 436 ..... 5:05 5:15 ..... 5:30 5:38 6:08 ..... 435 5:00 5:13 5:25 5:33 ..... ..... 6:17 ..... 436 ..... 5:55 6:03 ..... 6:16 6:22 6:43 ..... 435 6:00 6:13 6:25 6:33 ..... ..... 7:07 ..... 436 ..... 6:40 6:46 ..... 6:59 7:05 7:26 ..... 435 6:50 7:03 7:13 7:20 ..... ..... 7:54 ..... 435 7:40 7:53 8:03 8:08 ..... ..... 8:35 ..... 435 8:30 8:43 8:53 8:58 ..... ..... 9:25 ..... 435 9:20 9:33 9:43 9:48 ..... ..... 10:12 ..... 435 10:10 10:23 10:32 10:36 ..... ..... 11:00 ..... 435 11:00 11:13 11:22 11:26 ..... ..... 11:50 ..... 435 6:00A 6:05A ..... ..... 6:27A 6:43A 6:57A 7:10A 436 ..... 6:07 6:25A 6:32A ..... 6:44 ..... ..... 436 ..... 6:25 6:43 6:50 ..... 7:03 ..... ..... 435 6:50 6:55 ..... ..... 7:26 7:42 7:56 8:09 436 ..... 7:00 7:27 7:33 ..... 7:47 ..... ..... 436 ..... 7:50 8:17 8:23 ..... 8:37 ..... ..... 435 7:50 7:55 ..... ..... 8:23 8:39 8:53 9:06 436 ..... 8:40 8:59 9:05 ..... 9:18 9:26 ..... 435 8:50 8:55 ..... ..... 9:19 9:31 9:44 9:57 436 ..... 9:35 9:54 10:00 ..... 10:13 10:22 ..... 435 9:50 9:54 ..... ..... 10:16 10:28 10:41 10:54 435 10:40 10:44 ..... ..... 11:06 11:18 11:31 11:44 436 ..... 11:00 11:19 11:25 ..... 11:38 11:47 ..... 436 ..... 11:33 11:52 11:58 ..... 12:11P 12:20P ..... 435 11:40 11:45 ..... ..... 12:07P 12:19 12:32 12:45P 435 12:30P 12:35P ..... ..... 1:00 1:12 1:25 1:38 436 ..... 12:55 1:17P 1:23P ..... 1:36 1:45 ..... 435 1:26 1:31 ..... ..... 1:58 2:13 2:27 2:40 436 ..... 1:46 2:11 2:17 ..... 2:30 2:39 ..... 435 2:25 2:30 ..... ..... 2:59 3:15 3:30 3:43 436 s 2:36 2:44 3:13 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 436 ..... 3:06 3:35 3:41 ..... 3:54 4:03 ..... 435 3:25 3:31 ..... ..... 4:04 4:20 4:35 4:48 436 ..... 4:00 4:26 4:32 ..... 4:44 4:53 ..... 435 ..... 4:30 ..... ..... 5:03 5:15 5:32 5:45 436 ..... 4:54 5:20 5:26 ..... 5:38 5:47 ..... 435 ..... 5:30 ..... ..... 5:59 6:08 6:24 6:37 436 ..... 5:40 6:05 6:11 ..... 6:23 6:32 ..... 435 ..... 6:30 ..... ..... 6:52 7:01 7:14 7:27 436 ..... 6:35 6:54 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 435 ..... 7:20 ..... ..... 7:42 7:51 8:03 8:16 436 ..... 7:30 7:49 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 435 ..... 8:10 ..... ..... 8:29 8:36 8:47 9:00 435 ..... 9:00 ..... ..... 9:19 9:26 9:37 9:50 435 ..... 9:50 ..... ..... 10:09 10:16 10:27 10:40 436 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 6:47A 7:06A ..... 436 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 8:27 8:46 ..... 435 9:20A 9:33A 9:41A 9:47A ..... ..... 10:10 10:22A 436 ..... 10:05 10:12 ..... 10:24A 10:30 10:49 ..... 435 10:10 10:23 10:32 10:40 ..... ..... 11:16 11:28 436 ..... 11:15 11:23 ..... 11:35 11:41 12:00N ..... 435 11:05 11:18 11:29 11:37 ..... ..... 12:10 12:22P 435 12:05P 12:18P 12:29P 12:36P ..... ..... 1:09 1:21 436 ..... 12:30 12:38 ..... 12:50P 12:56P 1:15 ..... 435 1:05 1:18 1:29 1:36 ..... ..... 2:09 2:21 436 ..... 1:40 1:48 ..... 2:00 2:06 2:25 ..... 435 2:05 2:18 2:29 2:37 ..... ..... 3:16 3:28 436 ..... 2:50 2:58 ..... 3:10 3:16 3:35 ..... 435 3:05 3:18 3:33 3:40 ..... ..... 4:09 4:21 436 ..... 3:50 3:58 ..... 4:10 4:16 4:35 ..... 435 4:00 4:13 4:25 4:32 ..... ..... 5:01 5:15 436 ..... 5:00 5:08 ..... 5:20 5:26 5:45 ..... 435 4:55 5:08 5:20 5:27 ..... ..... 5:56 6:07 436 ..... 6:00 6:08 ..... 6:20 6:26 6:45 ..... 435 5:50 6:03 6:14 6:19 ..... ..... 6:49 ..... 435 6:45 6:58 7:09 7:14 ..... ..... 7:43 ..... 435 7:35 7:48 7:58 8:02 ..... ..... 8:30 ..... 435 8:20 8:33 8:43 8:47 ..... ..... 9:15 ..... 435 9:00 9:13 9:23 9:27 ..... ..... 9:52 ..... 435 9:45 9:58 10:07 10:11 ..... ..... 10:36 ..... 435 10:30 10:43 10:52 10:56 ..... ..... 11:21 ..... 435 11:05 11:18 11:27 11:31 ..... ..... 11:56 ..... 436 ..... 6:20A 6:40A ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 436 ..... 8:00 8:20 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 435 8:00A 8:05 ..... ..... 8:29A 8:41A 8:54A 9:07A 435 8:50 8:55 ..... ..... 9:19 9:31 9:44 9:57 436 ..... 9:00 9:19 9:23A ..... 9:36 9:45 ..... 435 9:40 9:45 ..... ..... 10:09 10:21 10:34 10:47 436 ..... 10:10 10:32 10:36 ..... 10:50 10:59 ..... 435 10:40 10:45 ..... ..... 11:09 11:21 11:35 11:48 436 ..... 11:15 11:36 11:40 ..... 11:54 12:03P ..... 435 11:40 11:45 ..... ..... 12:11P 12:23P 12:38 12:51P 436 ..... 12:35P 12:56P 1:01P ..... 1:15 1:24 ..... 435 12:40P 12:45 ..... ..... 1:11 1:23 1:38 1:51 435 1:40 1:45 ..... ..... 2:10 2:22 2:37 2:50 436 ..... 1:50 2:10 2:15 ..... 2:28 2:37 ..... 435 2:40 2:44 ..... ..... 3:08 3:20 3:35 3:48 436 ..... 2:50 3:11 3:16 ..... 3:29 3:37 ..... 435 3:40 3:44 ..... ..... 4:08 4:20 4:34 4:47 436 ..... 4:00 4:18 4:23 ..... 4:35 4:43 ..... 435 4:35 4:39 ..... ..... 5:03 5:15 5:29 5:42 436 ..... 5:00 5:17 5:21 ..... 5:33 5:41 ..... 435 5:25 5:29 ..... ..... 5:53 6:05 6:19 6:32 435 6:15 6:19 ..... ..... 6:43 6:55 7:09 7:22 435 ..... 7:10 ..... ..... 7:32 7:40 7:54 8:07 435 ..... 7:55 ..... ..... 8:15 8:22 8:33 8:46 435 ..... 8:40 ..... ..... 9:00 9:07 9:18 9:31 435 ..... 9:25 ..... ..... 9:45 9:52 10:03 10:16 435 ..... 10:00 ..... ..... 10:20 10:27 10:38 10:51 435 11:10A 11:20A 11:25A 11:52A 11:59A 435 1:30P 1:40P 1:45P 2:14P 2:21P 435 3:55 4:07 4:13 4:46 4:53 435 6:20 6:32 6:38 7:11 ..... 435 7:05 7:16 7:21 7:53 ..... 435 8:00 8:11 8:16 8:48 ..... 435 ..... 9:30A 9:54A 10:02A 10:16A 435 10:07A 10:12 10:36 10:44 10:55 435 12:20P 12:25P 12:50P 12:59P 1:14P 435 2:45 2:49 3:13 3:22 3:37 435 5:05 5:09 5:34 5:43 5:58 435 ..... 6:10 6:35 6:44 7:00 b - from Broadway & Conomo to W. Lynn Garage m - from Goodridge at Memorial Park to W. Lynn Garage s - does NOT run during school vacation No 436 service on Sunday 451 North Beverly - Salem Depot Lost & Found 617-222-5263 mbta.com 617-222-3200 617-222-5146 (TTY) Effective Aug 29, 2021 ScheduleChange CHANGE - RESTOREDWEEKDAYSATURDAYSUNDAYMAP Fare Local Bus Bus + Bus Bus + Subway CharlieCard $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $2.40 CharlieTicket $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $4.10* Cash-on-Board $1.70 $3.40 $2.40 $4.10 Student/Youth**$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 Senior/TAP***$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 FREE FARES: Children 11 and under ride free when accompanied by a paying customer;Blind Access CharlieCard holders ride free and if using a guide, the guide rides free. * Transfers Subway to Silver Line SL4 or SL5 pay $2.40 ** Requires Student CharlieCard or Youth CharlieCard. Student CharlieCards available to students through par�cipa�ng middle and high schools. Youth CharlieCards available through community partners across Greater Boston. *** Requires Senior/TAP CharlieCard, available to Medicare cardholders, seniors 65+, and persons with disabili�es. Subway ++ Holidays Fall 2021/Winter 2022 SaturdayChristmas Eve; NY Eve; MLK Day; President’s Day SundayLabor Day; Thanksgiving; Christmas Day; NY Day All MBTA buses accessible to persons with disabilities Weekday - Inbound Weekday - Outbound Salem Depot Tozer Road Salem Center Cummings Center Dodge @ Cabot North Beverly North Beverly Salem CenterTozerRoadDodge @ Cabot Cummings Center Salem Depot 6:42A ..... 6:44A 6:51A 7:05A 7:11A 8:04 ..... 8:08 8:16 8:35 8:39 9:30 ..... 9:33 9:41 9:58 10:02 4:37P 4:40P ..... 4:47P 5:07P 5:11P 6:08 6:11 ..... 6:18 6:34 6:36 7:25 7:28 ..... 7:33 7:52 7:54 5:55A 6:00A 6:15A ..... 6:26A 6:35A 7:17 7:23 7:38 ..... 7:47 7:56 8:45 8:50 9:05 ..... 9:14 9:23 3:45P 3:51P 4:08P 4:15P ..... 4:30P 5:20 5:27 5:42 5:53 ..... 6:00 6:45 6:51 7:03 7:11 ..... 7:20 TownForest 450/450W 424 455 429 429 436435 441 442 429 428 Exit 59 Saugus IronWorks 1 129 MELROSE HIGHLANDSMELROSE HIGHLANDS SWAMPSCOTTSWAMPSCOTT Lynn Fells P k w y.Main S t . Oak St. Nahant St. Walnut St . Humphrey St.Damon Ave.Howard St. W alnut St. Water St.New Salem St.Salem St. Lowell St.Vernon St.Main St.Ch e s t n u t S t . Appleton St. C h e s t n u t S t .Boston St.Essex St.G a r f i e l d A v e .Mai n S t . Lynn Fells Pkwy. SWAMPSCOTT MELROSE WAKE-FIELD SAUGUS LYNNFIELD LYNN SWAMPSCOTT SALEM PEABODY MARBLEHEAD DANVERS BEVERLY BreakheartReservation Lynn Woods LynnfieldCenterCountry Club King RailReserveGolf Course BowRidge SalemCountry Club MeadowsGolf Course Olde Salem GreensGolf Course SalemWoods JacksonPark MemorialPark BellevueGolf Club PearceLake SilverLake HawkesPond WaldenPond BreedsPond BirchPond FlaxPond SluicePond SpringPond BrownsPond SuntaugLake WinonaPond PillingsPond GriswoldPond Salem Harbor Beverly Harbor Laurel St.Ma i n S t . Walnut S t .East S t .Waverly Ave. Howard St. Upham St.Holyoke St.Cabot St.Soh ie r Rd . Elli o t S t . Elliot St. Elliot S t . Elliot S t .Rantoul St.Essex St.B r i m b a l A v e . Balch St. C a b o t S t . Colon St. Bridge S t .Lothrop St.Foster St.Dodge St. C o r n i n g S t . Purchase St. Holten St. Ma p l e S t .Summer St.Pi c k e r i n g S t .Locust St.Bur ley S t .Liberty St.Pine S t . Winona St. An d o v e r S t . Endicott St. C o l l i n s S t .Water St. Lowell S t .Pulaski St.Tremont St.Liberty Hill Ave.Nort h S t . M a r g i n S t .Highland Ave.Central St.Lynn St.Summit St.Lynnfield St. Bost o n S t . Mai n S t .Canal St.W ashington St.Lowell S t .Jefferson Ave.Centenni al Dr. Wils o n S t . Bridge St. Forest St. Warre n S t .BroadwayChe s t n u t S t .Western Ave.Eastern Ave.Lewis St.Boston St.Humphrey St.Paradise Rd.S a l e m S t .Loring Ave.Walnut S t .Essex St.G a r f i e l d A v e . L i nw o o d S t . Puritan St.Lincoln Ave.Lynn f i e l d S t . Euclid Ave.LynnwaySwampscott Rd.Parkland Ave.Boston St.Union St.Myrtle St.Humphrey St. T edesco St.Atlantic Ave.Lafayette St.Derby St. Ocean A ve.W. Shore Dr.Villag e S t . Bea c o n S t .W. Shore Dr.Pleasant St. Atlantic A ve. Lafayette St.Bridge St.Fort Ave.S u m m e r S t .Wa l nu t S t . L y n n f i e l d S t .Main S t . W aln u t S t .Central S t. Water St.Farm S t .Walnu t S t .Summer St.Water St.Lake S t .Vine St.Summer St.Appleton St. Main St.Central St.Ess e x S t .Cent ra l S t .Kernwood St.Herrick St.Western Ave.Wash i n g t o n S t . Fr a n k l i n S t .Sylvan St. A n d o v e r S t . Prospe ct St.Lowel l St. Forest St. Lynn Fells P k w y.Toze r Rd . SquareOne Mall Saugus Plaza EndicottPlaza LibertyTree Mall GoodwinsCircle NSMCUnion Hospital/AtlanticareMedical Center CentennialPark Vinnin Square WyomaSquare Shetland OfficePark BostonChildren’sat Peabody Exit 60 Exit 61 Exit 69 Exit 64Exit 37 Exit 63 Exit 40 Exit 39 Exit 38 Exit 41 Exit 42 Exit 43 Exit 44 Exit 45 Exit 46 Exit 47 Exit 67 Exit 68 Exit 66 Winter S t . Beverly Local Bus 978-283-7916 B B B 441 441 441 442 442 442 435 435 455 450/450W 450/450W 429 426/426W 436 431 429 450/450W 429 430430 436 436 131 430 429 439 439 LLogan ExpressPeabody–Logan Airport1-800-23-LOGANwww.massport.com 435 435 435 435 455 455424 424 436 436 435 428 428 Mai n S t . Lynn Fells Pkwy. 451 456 Saugus IronWorks SaugusCenter CummingsCenter BeverlyHospital City Hall FranklinStreet Northshore MallNorthshore Mall North Beverly MONTSERRATBEVERLYDEPOT NORTH BEVERLY To Rockport To Newburyport SALEMSALEM LYNNLYNN SWAMPSCOTTSWAMPSCOTTwburyport Commuter RailRockport/Ne1 1 1 128 128 22 22 62 95 62 62 35 128 95 12895 1 129 129 114 114 114 129 129 129 22 62 114 114 1A 129 107 129 129 129 107 129 Salem Salem Ferr y Information in this timetable is subject to change without notice. Traffic conditions and weather can affect running time. CHANGE - RESTOREDWEEKDAYSATURDAYSUNDAYMAP BreakheartReservation LynnfieldCountry Club BirchPond SWAMPSCOTT MELROSE WAKE- FIELD SAUGUS LYNNFIELD LYNN SWAMPSCOTT SALEM PEABODY MARBLEHEAD DANVERS BEVERLY BreakheartReservation Lynn Woods LynnfieldCountry Club Colonial Club SalemCountry Club HighlandPark JacksonPark MemorialPark BellevueGolf Club PearceLake SilverLake HawkesPond BreedsPond BirchPond FlaxPond SluicePond SpringPond BrownsPond SuntaugLake WinonaPond PillingsPond GriswoldPond Salem Harbor Beverly Harbor Lynn Fells P k w y.Laurel St.Ma i n S t . Walnut S t .East S t .Waverly Ave.Howard St. Upham St. Holyoke St.Cabot St.Sohier Rd.Elliot St.Elliot St.Rantoul St.Essex St.Brimball Ave.Balch St.Cabot St.Colon St.Bridge St.Lothrop St.Foster St.Dodge St.Corning St.Purchase St.High St.Elm St.Holten St.Maple St.Summer St.Pickering St.Locust St.Burley St.Liberty St.Pine St. Winona St. Andover St.Endicott St.Collins St.Water St.Lowell S t .Pulaski St.Tremont St.Liberty Hill Ave.Nort h S t . M a r g i n S t .Highland Ave.Central St.Lynn St.Summit St.L ynnfield St. Bost o n S t . Mai n S t .Canal St.W ashington St.Lowel l S t .Jefferson Ave.Centenni al D r Forest St. Wil s o n S t . Forest St. Warre n S t .BroadwayCh e s t n u t S t .Western Ave.Ea s t e r n Ave . Lewis St.Boston St.Humphrey S t .Paradise Rd.S a l em S t .Loring Ave.Walnut S t .Essex St.G a r f i e l d A v e .Lincoln Ave.Lyn n f i e l d S t .Jenness St. Euclid Ave.LynnwaySwampscott Rd.Union St.Trinity Ave.Myrtle St.Humphrey St. Tedesco St.Atlantic Ave.Lafayette St.Derby St. Ocean A ve.W Shore Dr.Villa g e S t . Be a c o n S t .W Shore Dr.Pleasant St . Atlantic A ve.Bridge St.Fort Ave.S u m m e r S t .Walnu t S t . L y n n f i e l d S t .Main S t . W al n u t S t .Central St. Water St . F a rm S t .Walnu t S t .Summer St.Water St .Lake S t .Vine St.Summer St.Appleton St. Main St.Central St.Kernwood StHerrick St.SquareOne Mall Saugus Plaza EndicottPlazaLibertyTree Mall GoodwinsCircle NSMCUnion Hospital/AtlanticareMedical Center Vinnin Square Shetland OfficePark Exit 46 Exit 47 Exit 23 Exit 22 Exit 21 Exit 20 Exit 19 Exit 18Exit 48 Exit 49 Exit 64Exit 37 Exit 63 Exit 66 Exit 38 Exit 39 Exit 41 Exit 40 Beverly Local Bus978-283-7916BB 436 435465 B 435 451 451 441 441 441 442 442 442 435 435 455 455 429 426/426W 436 429 429 430430 435 436 436 434 434 131 428 428 430 429 439 439 LLogan Express Peabody–Logan Airport 1-800-23-LOGAN www.massport.com 435 435 435 450/450W 424424 450/450W Saugus IronWorks SaugusCenter WakefieldHigh School To/from WonderlandTo/from Wonderland North BeverlyCummings Center BeverlyHospitalCity HallDanversSquare FranklinSt. Northshore MallNorthshore Mall MONTSERRATBEVERLY DEPOT NORTH BEVERLY To RockportTo Newburyport SALEMSALEM SWAMPSCOTTSWAMPSCOTTwburyport Commuter RailRockport/Ne1 1 1 128 12822 22221A976295626235 128 95 12895 1 129 129 114 114 129 129 129 2262 114 114 1A 129 129 129 Was h i n g t o n S t . Fr a n k l i n S t . LYNNLYNN Western Ave.Western Ave.Essex St Federal St Chestnut St Norman StSummer StLynde St Federal St WashingtonStChurch St Essex St CentralBridge StBridge St WashingtonSq.NorthLibe r ty S t Charter St Derby StNewDerby LafayetteStHarbor StCongress StHawthorneBridge St SALEM Margin StNorth StEssex St. 455 Salem Depot - Wonderland Station Lost & Found617-222-5263 mbta.com617-222-3200617-222-5146 (TTY) Effective Dec 19, 2021 Information in this timetable is subject to change without notice. Traffic conditions and weather can affect running time. ScheduleChange 455 WEEKDAY DONE ..... ..... 4:45A 5:08A ..... ..... 5:00 5:23 ..... ..... 5:20 5:43 ..... ..... 5:33 5:56 5:10A 5:23A 5:37 6:02 5:40 5:53 6:07 6:33 6:00 6:13 6:27 6:57 6:25 6:43 6:59 7:31 6:55 7:14 7:30 8:02 7:25 7:44 8:00 8:32 7:55 8:14 8:30 9:02 8:25 8:44 9:00 9:32 8:50 9:09 9:25 9:57 9:15 9:34 9:50 10:22 9:45 10:04 10:20 10:52 10:10 10:29 10:45 11:17 10:35 10:54 11:10 11:42 11:00 11:19 11:35 12:07P 11:25 11:44 12:00N 12:32 11:55 12:14P 12:30 1:01 12:25P 12:50 1:07 1:38 12:55 1:21 1:38 2:09 1:25 1:51 2:08 2:39 1:55 2:21 2:38 3:09 sta ..... 2:35 2:49 ..... 2:25 2:51 3:08 3:39 2:55 3:21 3:38 4:09 3:25 3:51 4:08 4:39 3:55 4:21 4:38 5:09 4:25 4:51 5:05 5:35 4:55 5:20 5:34 6:04 5:25 5:50 6:04 6:33 5:55 6:15 6:28 6:57 6:25 6:45 6:58 7:23 7:25 7:44 7:57 8:20 8:30 8:45 8:56 9:19 9:30 9:45 9:56 10:19 10:30 10:45 10:56 11:19 11:30 11:41 11:50 12:07A 12:27A 12:38A 12:47A 1:04 Weekday Inbound Inbound InboundOutboundOutbound Outbound 455 455 455Saturday Sunday Leave Salem Depot Leave Salem Depot Leave Salem Depot Leave Wonder- land Station Leave Wonder- land Station Arrive Salem Depot Arrive Wonder- land Station Arrive Wonder- land Station Arrive Salem Depot Arrive Salem Depot Arrive Vinnin Square Arrive Vinnin Square Arrive Vinnin Square Arrive Central Square Arrive Central Square ArriveWonder- land Station Arrive Central Square Lv/ArriveCentral Square Lv/ArriveCentral Square Lv/ArriveCentral Square Arrive VinninSquare Arrive VinninSquare Leave Wonder- landStation Arrive Vinnin Square Weekend Note: This route does not serve Shetland Office Park. Route 455 Salem Depot-Wonderland Station a - From/to West Lynn Garage s - does not run during school vacation t - From Thurgood Marshall Fare Local Bus Bus + Bus Bus + Subway CharlieCard $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $2.40 CharlieTicket $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $4.10* Cash-on-Board $1.70 $3.40 $2.40 $4.10 Student/Youth**$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 Senior/TAP***$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 FREE FARES: Children 11 and under ride free when accompanied by a paying customer;Blind Access CharlieCard holders ride free and if using a guide, the guide rides free. * Transfers Subway to Silver Line SL4 or SL5 pay $2.40 ** Requires Student CharlieCard or Youth CharlieCard. Student CharlieCards available to students through par�cipa�ng middle and high schools. Youth CharlieCards available through community partners across Greater Boston. *** Requires Senior/TAP CharlieCard, available to Medicare cardholders, seniors 65+, and persons with disabili�es. Subway ++ Holidays Winter 2022 SaturdayChristmas Eve; NY Eve; MLK Day; President’s Day SundayChristmas Day; NY Day All MBTA buses accessible to persons with disabilities WEEKDAY DONE ..... ..... 5:15A 5:39A ..... ..... 5:55 6:19 6:05A 6:16A 6:32 6:53 6:40 6:51 7:07 7:28 7:05 7:16 7:32 7:53 7:25 7:36 7:52 8:13 8:05 8:16 8:32 8:53 8:32 8:43 8:59 9:20 9:05 9:16 9:32 10:01 9:35 9:47 10:03 10:32 10:08 10:20 10:36 11:05 10:35 10:47 11:03 11:32 11:14 11:30 11:46 12:14P 11:51 12:07P 12:24P 12:52 12:26P 12:43 1:00 1:27 12:55 1:11 1:26 1:53 1:35 1:51 2:06 2:33 2:11 2:27 2:42 3:09 2:47 3:03 3:18 3:45 3:16 3:32 3:47 4:14 3:55 4:11 4:26 4:53 4:31 4:47 5:02 5:29 5:07 5:23 5:38 6:05 5:36 5:52 6:07 6:33 6:15 6:31 6:44 7:07 6:45 6:58 7:11 7:34 a 7:20 7:33 a 7:46 ..... 7:47 8:00 8:13 8:36 8:45 8:58 9:11 9:32 9:47 10:00 10:13 10:34 10:45 10:58 11:10 11:28 11:45 11:55 12:07A 12:25A ..... ..... 5:40A 6:03A 6:05A 6:16A 6:33 6:56 7:10 7:21 7:38 8:01 8:05 8:16 8:33 8:56 9:03 9:14 9:31 9:54 10:10 10:21 10:38 11:04 11:15 11:29 11:46 12:14P 12:21P 12:35P 12:52P 1:20P 1:30 1:44 2:01 2:29 2:40 2:54 3:11 3:39 3:50 4:04 4:21 4:49 4:52 5:06 5:23 5:51 6:00 6:11 6:28 6:52 7:00 7:11 7:28 7:51 8:00 8:11 8:25 8:48 9:05 9:16 9:30 9:53 10:03 10:14 10:28 10:51 a 11:05 11:15 11:28 ..... 11:35 11:45 11:58 12:18A ..... a 5:26A 5:36A 5:49A ..... a 5:56 6:06 6:19 6:25A 6:47 6:59 7:15 6:36 6:59 7:11 7:27 7:05 7:28 7:40 7:56 7:35 7:58 8:10 8:26 8:05 8:28 8:40 8:56 8:35 8:59 9:11 9:27 9:08 9:32 9:44 10:00 9:35 9:59 10:11 10:27 10:07 10:31 10:45 11:07 10:38 11:03 11:17 11:39 11:13 11:38 11:52 12:14P 11:40 12:05P 12:19P 12:41 12:22P 12:47 1:01 1:23 1:00 1:25 1:39 2:01 1:36 2:01 2:15 2:37 2:05 2:30 2:44 3:06 2:41 3:06 3:20 3:42 3:20 3:45 3:59 4:21 3:56 4:21 4:35 4:57 4:25 4:50 5:04 5:26 5:05 5:30 5:43 6:03 5:40 6:01 6:14 6:34 6:15 6:36 6:49 7:09 6:43 7:04 7:17 7:36 7:20 7:41 7:54 8:12 8:50 9:11 9:24 9:40 9:40 9:58 10:10 10:26 10:42 11:00 11:12 11:28 11:40 11:58 12:07A 12:19A ..... a 5:33A 5:43A 5:55A 6:15A 6:37 6:52 7:05 7:05 7:27 7:42 7:55 8:05 8:27 8:42 8:55 9:05 9:27 9:42 9:55 10:02 10:26 10:41 10:58 11:15 11:39 11:54 12:11P 12:25P 12:49P 1:04P 1:19P 1:35 2:01 2:16 2:31 2:45 3:11 3:26 3:41 3:47 4:13 4:28 4:43 5:00 5:22 5:37 5:53 6:00 6:22 6:37 6:53 7:00 7:20 7:34 7:49 8:00 8:20 8:34 8:49 9:00 9:20 9:34 9:49 10:00 10:20 10:34 10:49 10:56 11:16 11:30 11:45 ..... ..... 4:45A 5:08A ..... ..... 5:00 5:23 ..... ..... 5:20 5:43 ..... ..... 5:33 5:56 5:10A 5:23A 5:37 6:02 5:40 5:53 6:07 6:33 6:00 6:13 6:27 6:57 6:25 6:43 6:59 7:31 6:55 7:14 7:30 8:02 7:25 7:44 8:00 8:32 7:55 8:14 8:30 9:02 8:25 8:44 9:00 9:32 8:50 9:09 9:25 9:57 9:15 9:34 9:50 10:22 9:45 10:04 10:20 10:52 10:10 10:29 10:45 11:17 10:35 10:54 11:10 11:42 11:00 11:19 11:35 12:07P 11:25 11:44 12:00N 12:32 11:55 12:14P 12:30 1:01 12:25P 12:50 1:07 1:38 12:55 1:21 1:38 2:09 1:25 1:51 2:08 2:39 1:55 2:21 2:38 3:09 sta ..... 2:35 2:49 ..... 2:25 2:51 3:08 3:39 2:55 3:21 3:38 4:09 3:25 3:51 4:08 4:39 3:55 4:21 4:38 5:09 4:25 4:51 5:05 5:35 4:55 5:20 5:34 6:04 5:25 5:50 6:04 6:33 5:55 6:15 6:28 6:57 6:25 6:45 6:58 7:23 7:25 7:44 7:57 8:20 8:30 8:45 8:56 9:19 9:30 9:45 9:56 10:19 10:30 10:45 10:56 11:19 11:30 11:41 11:50 12:07A 12:27A 12:38A 12:47A 1:04 a ..... 5:26A 5:35A 5:50Aa ..... 6:04 6:18 6:34 6:15A 6:37 6:53 7:15 6:45 7:07 7:23 7:45 7:10 7:35 7:51 8:13 7:35 8:00 8:16 8:38 7:55 8:20 8:36 8:58 8:15 8:40 8:56 9:18 8:35 9:00 9:16 9:38 8:55 9:20 9:36 9:58 9:20 9:45 10:01 10:23 9:45 10:10 10:26 10:48 10:10 10:35 10:51 11:13 10:40 11:05 11:21 11:43 11:10 11:35 11:51 12:13P 11:35 12:00N 12:16P 12:38 12:00N 12:25 12:41 1:03 12:30 12:55 1:11 1:33 1:00 1:25 1:42 2:07 1:25 1:57 2:14 2:39 1:55 2:29 2:46 3:11 2:25 2:59 3:16 3:41 2:55 3:29 3:46 4:11 3:25 3:59 4:16 4:41 3:55 4:29 4:46 5:11 4:25 5:01 5:18 5:43 4:55 5:31 5:48 6:12 5:25 6:00 6:15 6:38 5:55 6:25 6:40 7:03 6:25 6:55 7:09 7:29 6:55 7:17 7:30 7:50 7:28 7:49 8:02 8:22 8:28 8:49 9:02 9:22 9:28 9:48 9:59 10:19 10:30 10:50 11:01 11:19 11:30 11:48 11:59 12:14A 12:21A 12:38A 12:47A 1:02 456 Salem Center - Central Sq, Lynn Lost & Found617-222-5263 mbta.com617-222-3200617-222-5146 (TTY) Effective Dec 19, 2021 ScheduleChange Weekday - Inbound Weekday - Outbound Central Sq,Lynn SalemHospitalEssex &Eastern Eastern &Western BuchananCircle Salem Center Salem Center Essex &EasternSalemHospitalBuchananCircleEastern &Western Central Sq,Lynn Fare Local Bus Bus + Bus Bus + Subway CharlieCard $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $2.40 CharlieTicket $1.70 $1.70 $2.40 $4.10* Cash-on-Board $1.70 $3.40 $2.40 $4.10 Student/Youth** $0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 Senior/TAP***$0.85 $0.85 $1.10 $1.10 FREE FARES: Children 11 and under ride free when accompanied by a paying customer;Blind Access CharlieCard holders ride free and if using a guide, the guide rides free.* Transfers Subway to Silver Line SL4 or SL5 pay $2.40 ** Requires Student CharlieCard or Youth CharlieCard. Student CharlieCards available to students through par�cipa�ng middle and high schools. Youth CharlieCards available through community partners across Greater Boston. *** Requires Senior/TAP CharlieCard, available to Medicare cardholders, seniors 65+, and persons with disabili�es. Subway ++ Holidays Winter 2022 SaturdayChristmas Eve; NY Eve; MLK Day; President’s Day SundayChristmas Day; NY Day All MBTA buses accessible to persons with disabilities WEEKDAY DONE 9:55A 10:01A 10:08A 10:09A 10:12A 10:21A11:10 11:16 11:23 11:24 11:27 11:36 12:25P 12:32P 12:39P 12:41P 12:44P 12:53P 1:40 1:47 1:55 1:57 2:00 2:09 3:05 3:14 3:23 3:25 3:29 3:39 10:30A 10:38A 10:42A 10:43A 10:51A 11:03A11:45 11:53 11:56 11:57 12:05P 12:17P 1:00P 1:08P 1:11P 1:12P 1:20 1:32 2:15 2:24 2:29 2:30 2:39 2:51 3:45 3:55 4:00 4:01 4:11 4:24 TownForest 450/450W 424 455 429 429 436435 441 442 429 428 Exit 59 Saugus IronWorks 1 129 MELROSE HIGHLANDSMELROSE HIGHLANDS SWAMPSCOTTSWAMPSCOTT Lynn Fells P k w y.Main S t . Oak St. Nahant St. Walnut St . Humphrey St.Damon Ave.Howard St. W alnut St. Water St.New Salem St.Salem St. Lowell St.Vernon St.Main St.Ch e s t n u t S t . Appleton St. C h e s t n u t S t .Boston St.Essex St.G a r f i e l d A v e . Mai n S t . Lynn Fells Pkwy. SWAMPSCOTT MELROSE WAKE-FIELD SAUGUS LYNNFIELD LYNN SWAMPSCOTT SALEM PEABODY MARBLEHEAD DANVERS BEVERLY BreakheartReservation Lynn Woods LynnfieldCenterCountry Club King RailReserveGolf Course BowRidge SalemCountry Club MeadowsGolf Course Olde Salem GreensGolf Course SalemWoods JacksonPark MemorialPark BellevueGolf Club PearceLake SilverLake HawkesPond WaldenPond BreedsPond BirchPond FlaxPond SluicePond SpringPond BrownsPond SuntaugLake WinonaPond PillingsPond GriswoldPond Salem Harbor Beverly Harbor Laurel St.Ma i n S t . Walnut S t .East S t .Waverly Ave. Howard St. Upham St.Holyoke St.Cabot St.Sohier Rd.Elliot St.Elliot St.Rantoul St.Essex St.Brimbal Ave.Balch St.Cabot St.Colon St.Bridge St.Lothrop St.Foster St.Dodge St.Corning St.Purchase St.Holten St.Maple St.Summer St.Pickering St.Locust St.Burley St.Liberty St.Pine St. Winona St.Andover St.Endicott St.Collins St.Water St.Lowell S t .Pulaski St.Tremont St.Liberty Hill Ave.Nort h S t . M a r g i n S t .Highland Ave.Central St.Lynn St.Summit St.L ynnfield St. Bost o n S t . Main S t .Canal St.W ashington St.Lowell S t .Jefferson Ave.Centenni al Dr. Wils o n S t . Bridge St. Forest St. Warre n S t .BroadwayChe s t n u t S t .Western Ave.Eastern Ave.Lewis St.Boston St.Humphrey St .Paradise Rd.S a l e m S t .Loring Ave.Walnut S t .Essex St.G a r f i e l d A v e . L i nw o o d S t . Puritan St.Lincoln Ave.Lynn f i e l d S t . Euclid Ave.LynnwaySwampscott Rd.Parkland Ave.Boston St.Union St.Myrtle St.Humphrey St. T edesco St.Atlantic Ave.Lafayette St.Derby St. Ocean A ve.W. Shore Dr.Villag e S t . Bea c o n S t .W. Shore Dr.Pleasant St. Atlantic A ve. Lafayette St.Bridge St.Fort Ave.S u m m e r S t .Wa l n u t S t . L y n n f i e l d S t .Main S t . W aln u t S t .Central S t . Water St.Farm S t .Walnu t S t .Summer St.Water St.Lake S t .Vine St.Summer St.Appleton St. Main St.Central St.Ess e x S t .Cent ra l S t .Kernwood St.Herrick St.Western Ave.Wash i n g t o n S t . Fr a n k l i n S t .Sylvan St.Andov e r S t . Prospect St.Lowel l St. Forest St. Lynn Fells P k w y.Tozer Rd.Trinity Ave.Trinity Ave.SquareOne Mall Saugus Plaza EndicottPlazaLibertyTree Mall GoodwinsCircle NSMCUnion Hospital/AtlanticareMedical Center CentennialPark Vinnin Square WyomaSquare Shetland OfficePark BostonChildren’sat Peabody Exit 60 Exit 61 Exit 69 Exit 64Exit 37 Exit 63 Exit 40 Exit 39 Exit 38 Exit 41 Exit 42 Exit 43 Exit 44 Exit 45 Exit 46 Exit 47Exit 67Exit 68Exit 66 Winter S t . Beverly Local Bus978-283-7916BB B 441 441 441 442 442 442 435 435 455 450/450W 450/450W 429 426/426W 436 431 429 450/450W 429 430430 436 436 131 430 429 439 439 LLogan ExpressPeabody–Logan Airport1-800-23-LOGANwww.massport.com 435 435 435 435 455 455424 424 436 436 435 428 428 Mai n S t . Lynn Fells Pkwy. 451 451 451 456 456 Saugus IronWorks SaugusCenter Cummings Center BeverlyHospitalCity Hall FranklinStreet Northshore MallNorthshore Mall North Beverly MONTSERRATBEVERLYDEPOT NORTH BEVERLY To RockportTo Newburyport SALEMSALEM LYNNLYNN SWAMPSCOTTSWAMPSCOTTwburyport Commuter RailRockport/Ne1 1 1 128 12822 22221A976295626235 128 95 12895 1 129 129 114 114 114 129 129 129 2262 114 114 1A 129 107 129 129 129 107 129 Salem Salem Ferr y Information in this timetable is subject to change without notice. Traffic conditions and weather can affect running time. WEEKDAY DONE AM NEWBURYPORT/ROCKPORT LINE Inbound to Boston PM Monday to Friday Monday to Friday PMOutbound from Boston AM Saturday & Sunday Inbound to Boston AM PM ZONE STATION TRAIN # ZONE STATION TRAIN # Customer Service 617-222-3200 Visit MBTA.com Follow @MBTA_CR 02142022 Times in purple with “f “ indicate a flag stop: Passengers must tell the conductor that they wish to leave. Passengers waiting to board must be visible on the platform for the train to stop. Bikes: Bicycles are allowed on all trains unless the designated areas are too crowded. Bicycles are not allowed on board buses. Board the next Rockport Train at Beverly for continued service to Boston Board a Rockport Train and change to the bus at Beverly for continued service to Newbruyport High level platform and bridge plate available. Visit mbta.com/accessibility for more information. Download the mTicket App Diversion Schedule Effective Saturday, March 5th SATURDAY TRAIN # ZONE STATION SUNDAY TRAIN # Saturday & Sunday AM PMOutbound from Boston 140X: Service with an "X" operates express between Beverly and Newburyport and connects with a regular Rockport Train. 140L: Service with an "L" makes local stops between Newburyport and Beverly and connects with a regular Newburyport Train. B: Bus departure times on the Newburyport and Rockport Line (Due to construction activities for the Gloucester Drawbridge Replacement project, bus shuttles also replace train service between Rockport, Gloucester, West Gloucester and Manchester on designated outbound trips). Shuttle buses replace train service between Newburyport and Beverly on weekdays and weekends while the signal system is updated. SATURDAY TRAIN # ZONE STATION SUNDAY TRAIN # 140L 140X 100 142L 142X 102 144L 144X 104 146L 146X 106 148L 148X 108 150L 192 150X 110 152L 152X 112 154L 154X 114 156L 198 156X 116 158L 118 160L 160X 120 162L 162X 122 164X 124 164L Bikes Allowed 8 Rockport --B 4:58 --B 6:03 --B 7:03 --B 8:03 --B 9:03 ---B 10:33 --B 12:03 --B 1:33 ---B 3:03 ----B 5:36 --B 7:36 -B 8:40 - 7 Gloucester --B 5:05 --B 6:10 --B 7:10 --B 8:10 --B 9:10 ---B 10:40 --B 12:10 --B 1:40 ---B 3:10 ----B 5:43 --B 7:43 -B 8:47 - 7 West Gloucester --5:21 --6:26 --7:26 --8:26 --9:26 ---10:56 --12:26 --1:56 ---3:26 ----5:59 --7:59 -9:03 - 6 Manchester --5:28 --6:33 --7:33 --8:33 --9:33 ---11:03 --12:33 --2:03 ---3:33 ----6:06 --8:06 -9:10 - 5 Beverly Farms --5:34 --6:39 --7:39 --8:39 --f 9:39 ---f 11:09 --f 12:39 --f 2:09 ---f 3:39 ----f 6:12 --f 8:12 -f 9:16 - 4 Montserrat --5:40 --6:45 --7:45 --8:45 --f 9:45 ---f 11:15 --f 12:45 --f 2:15 ---f 3:45 ----f 6:18 --f 8:18 -f 9:22 - 8 Newburyport B 3:50 B 4:50 -B 4:51 B 5:56 -B 5:42 B 6:50 -B 6:45 B 7:43 -B 7:45 B 8:46 -B 8:45 B 9:46 B 10:16 -B 10:45 B 11:46 -B 12:09 B 1:16 -B 1:09 -B 2:46 -B 2:44 B 4:07 B 4:08 B 5:16 -B 6:01 B 7:20 -B 8:30 -B 9:02 7 Rowley B 4:14 --B 5:17 --B 6:11 --B 7:13 --B 8:13 --B 9:13 ---B 11:13 --B 12:39 --B 1:39 ---B 3:14 -B 4:35 --B 6:27 ----B 9:26 6 Ipswich B 4:30 --B 5:33 --B 6:29 --B 7:31 --B 8:31 --B 9:31 ---B 11:31 --B 12:58 --B 1:58 ---B 3:33 -B 4:52 --B 6:43 ----B 9:42 5 Hamilton/Wenham B 4:48 --B 5:52 --B 6:50 --B 7:51 --B 8:51 --B 9:51 ---B 11:51 --B 1:19 --B 2:19 ---B 3:54 -B 5:12 --B 7:02 ----B 10:00 5 North Beverly B 4:56 --B 6:01 --B 7:00 --B 8:00 --B 9:00 --B 10:00 ---B 12:00 --B 1:29 --B 2:29 ---B 4:04 -B 5:20 --B 7:11 ----B 10:08 4 Beverly (bus arrival)B 5:05 B 5:34 -B 6:10 B 6:40 -B 7:10 B 7:40 -B 8:10 B 8:40 -B 9:10 B 9:40 -B 10:10 B 10:40 B 11:10 -B 12:10 B 12:40 -B 1:40 B 2:10 -B 2:40 -B 3:40 -B 4:15 B 5:04 B 5:30 B 6:13 -B 7:20 B 8:10 -B 9:17 -B 10:17 4 Beverly (train departure)5:15 5:45 6:20 6:50 7:20 7:50 8:20 8:50 9:20 9:50 10:20 10:50 11:20 12:20 12:50 1:50 2:20 2:50 3:20 3:50 4:25 5:14 5:40 6:23 7:30 8:23 9:27 10:27 3 Salem 5:19 Board Rockport Train 100 at Beverly for service to Boston 5:49 6:24 -6:54 7:24 -7:54 8:24 -8:54 9:24 -9:54 10:24 10:54 -11:24 12:24 -12:54 1:54 -2:24 2:54 3:24 -3:54 4:29 5:18 5:44 -6:27 7:34 -8:27 -9:31 10:31 3 Swampscott 5:26 5:56 6:31 -7:01 7:31 -8:01 8:31 -9:01 9:31 -10:01 10:31 11:01 -11:31 12:31 -1:01 2:01 -2:31 3:01 3:31 -4:01 4:36 5:25 5:51 -6:34 7:41 -8:34 -9:38 10:38 2 Lynn 5:29 5:59 6:34 -7:04 7:34 -8:04 8:34 -9:04 9:34 -10:04 10:34 11:04 -11:34 12:34 -1:04 2:04 -2:34 3:04 3:34 -4:04 4:39 5:28 5:54 -6:37 7:44 -8:37 -9:41 10:41 2 River Works f 5:32 f 6:02 f 6:37 -f 7:07 --f 8:07 f 8:37 --------------f 2:37 f 3:07 f 3:37 -f 4:07 f 4:42 f 5:31 f 5:57 -f 6:40 f 7:47 ----f 10:44 1A Chelsea 5:39 6:09 6:45 -7:15 7:44 -8:15 8:45 -9:14 f 9:43 -f 10:13 f 10:43 f 11:13 -f 11:43 F 12:43 -f 1:13 f 2:13 -f 2:44 f 3:14 f 3:44 -f 4:14 f 4:49 f 5:38 f 6:04 -f 6:47 f 7:54 -f 8:46 -f 9:50 f 10:51 1A North Station 5:53 6:24 7:00 -7:31 7:59 -8:31 9:00 -9:29 9:58 -10:28 10:57 11:26 -11:58 12:57 -1:28 2:27 -2:59 3:28 3:57 -4:29 5:03 5:53 6:19 -7:02 8:08 -9:01 -10:05 11:05 141L 101 141X 143L 103 145L 105 145X 191 147L 107 147X 149L 109 149X 151L 111 151X 197 153L 113 153X 155L 115 155X 157L 117 157X 159L 119 159X 161L 121 161X 163L 123 163X 165L 125 165X Bikes Allowed 1A North Station 5:30 6:35 Board Rockport Train 101 and change at Beverly for bus service to Newburyport 7:30 7:50 8:30 9:05 -9:30 10:00 10:35 -11:30 12:05 -1:00 1:35 -2:00 2:30 3:05 -3:35 4:05 -4:35 5:05 -5:35 6:05 -6:40 7:20 -8:05 8:50 -9:35 11:00 - 1A Chelsea f 5:41 f 6:46 f 7:41 -f 8:41 f 9:16 -f 9:41 f 10:11 f 10:46 -f 11:41 f 12:16 -f 1:11 f 1:46 -f 2:11 f 2:41 f 3:16 -3:46 4:16 -4:46 5:16 -5:46 6:16 -6:51 f 7:31 -f 8:16 f 9:01 -f 9:46 f 11:11 - 2 River Works f 5:48 f 6:53 f 7:48 ------------f 1:54 --f 2:49 f 3:24 -f 3:54 f 4:24 --f 5:24 -f 5:54 --f 6:59 f 7:39 -----f 11:19 - 2 Lynn 5:51 6:56 7:51 -8:50 9:25 -9:50 10:20 10:55 -11:50 12:25 -1:20 1:56 -2:20 2:51 3:26 -3:56 4:26 -4:55 5:26 -5:56 6:25 -7:01 7:41 -8:25 9:10 -9:55 11:21 - 3 Swampscott 5:54 6:59 7:54 -8:53 9:28 -9:53 10:23 10:58 -11:53 12:28 -1:23 1:59 -2:23 2:54 3:29 -3:59 4:29 -4:58 5:29 -5:59 6:28 -7:04 7:44 -8:28 9:13 -9:58 11:24 - 3 Salem 6:01 7:06 8:01 8:16 9:01 9:35 -10:01 10:31 11:05 -12:01 12:35 -1:31 2:06 -2:31 3:01 3:36 -4:06 4:36 -5:05 5:36 -6:06 6:35 -7:11 7:51 -8:35 9:20 -10:05 11:31 - 4 Beverly (Train departure)6:05 7:10 8:05 8:20 9:05 9:39 10:05 10:35 11:09 12:05 12:39 1:35 2:10 2:35 3:05 3:40 4:10 4:40 5:09 5:40 6:10 6:39 7:15 7:55 8:39 9:24 10:09 11:35 4 Beverly (Bus departure)B 6:10 -B 7:15 B 8:10 -B 9:10 -B 9:44 -B 10:40 -B 11:14 B 12:10 -B 12:44 B 1:40 -B 2:15 -B 3:10 -B 3:45 B 4:15 -B 4:45 B 5:14 -B 5:45 B 6:15 -B 6:44 B 7:20 -B 8:00 B 8:44 -B 9:29 B 10:14 B 11:40 5 North Beverly B 6:19 --B 8:21 -B 9:21 ---B 10:51 --B 12:21 --B 1:51 ---B 3:21 --B 4:26 --B 5:24 --B 6:25 --B 7:30 --B 8:53 --B 10:23 -B 11:49 5 Hamilton/Wenham B 6:26 --B 8:29 -B 9:29 ---B 10:59 --B 12:29 --B 1:59 ---B 3:29 --B 4:34 --B 5:32 --B 6:33 --B 7:37 --B 9:00 --B 10:30 -B 11:56 6 Ipswich B 6:43 --B 8:50 -B 9:51 ---B 11:21 --B 12:51 --B 2:21 ---B 3:51 --B 4:55 --B 5:53 --B 6:53 --B 7:57 --B 9:19 --B 10:49 -B 12:15 7 Rowley B 6:58 --B 9:09 -B 10:09 ---B 11:39 --B 1:09 --B 2:39 ---B 4:09 --B 5:14 --B 6:11 --B 7:10 --B 8:13 --B 9:34 --B 11:04 -B 12:30 8 Newburyport B 7:21 -B 8:02 B 9:37 -B 10:38 -B 10:34 -B 12:08 -B 12:04 B 1:38 -B 1:34 B 3:08 -B 3:09 -B 4:38 -B 4:42 B 5:42 -B 5:42 B 6:38 -B 6:39 B 7:36 -B 7:31 B 8:39 -B 8:47 B 9:58 -B 10:16 B 11:28 -B 12:54 4 Montserrat -f 7:14 ----f 9:43 ---f 11:13 --f 12:43 --f 2:14 ---f 3:44 --4:44 --5:44 --6:43 --f 7:59 --f 9:28 --f 11:39 - 5 Beverly Farms -f 7:20 ----f 9:49 ---f 11:19 --f 12:49 --f 2:20 ---f 3:50 --4:51 --5:51 --6:50 --f 8:05 --f 9:34 --f 11:45 - 6 Manchester -B 7:26 ----B 9:55 ---B 11:25 --B 12:55 --B 2:26 ---B 3:56 --B 4:57 --5:57 --B 6:56 --B 8:12 --B 9:40 --B 11:51 - 7 West Gloucester -B 7:46 ----B 10:15 ---B 11:45 --B 1:15 --B 2:46 ---B 4:16 --B 5:17 --B 6:03 --B 7:16 --B 8:32 --B 10:00 --B 12:11 - 7 Gloucester -B 7:54 ----B 10:23 ---B 11:53 --B 1:23 --B 2:54 ---B 4:24 --B 5:25 --B 6:16 --B 7:24 --B 8:40 --B 10:08 --B 12:11 - 8 Rockport -B 7:54 ----B 10:23 ---B 11:53 --B 1:23 --B 2:54 ---B 4:24 --B 5:25 --B 6:23 --B 7:24 --B 8:40 --B 10:08 --B 12:19 - 1150L 1150X 1100 1152L 1152X 1102 1154L 1154X 1104 1156L 1156X 1106 1158L 1158X 1108 1160L 1160X 1110 1162L 1162X 1112 1164L 1164X 1114 1166L 1166L 1116 2150L 2150X 2100 2152L 2152X 2102 2154L 2154X 2104 2156L 2156X 2106 2158L 2158X 2108 2160L 2160X 2110 2162L 2162X 2112 2164L 2164X 2114 2166L 2166L 2116 Bikes Allowed 8 Rockport --B 5:50 --B 7:50 --B 9:50 --B 11:50 --B 1:50 --B 3:50 --B 5:50 --B 7:50 --B 9:50 7 Gloucester --B 5:57 --B 7:57 --B 9:57 --B 11:57 --B 1:57 --B 3:57 --B 5:57 --B 7:57 --B 9:57 7 West Gloucester --6:13 --8:13 --10:13 --12:13 --2:13 --4:13 --6:13 --8:13 --10:13 6 Manchester --6:20 --8:20 --10:20 --12:20 --2:20 --4:20 --6:20 --8:20 --10:20 5 Beverly Farms --f 6:26 --f 8:26 --f 10:26 --f 12:26 --f 2:26 --f 4:26 --f 6:26 --f 8:26 --f 10:26 4 Montserrat --f 6:32 --f 8:32 --f 10:32 --f 12:32 --f 2:32 --f 4:32 --f 6:32 --f 8:32 --f 10:32 8 Newburyport B 4:12 B 5:43 -B 6:08 B 7:37 -B 8:02 B 9:33 -B 10:02 B 11:30 -B 12:02 B 1:33 -B 2:02 B 3:33 -B 4:05 B 5:33 -B 6:12 B 7:37 -B 8:12 B 9:43 - 7 Rowley B 4:36 --B 6:34 --B 8:30 --B 10:30 --B 12:30 --B 2:30 --B 4:32 --B 6:36 --B 8:36 -- 6 Ipswich B 4:52 --B 6:50 --B 8:48 --B 10:48 --B 12:48 --B 2:48 --B 4:49 --B 6:52 --B 8:52 -- 5 Hamilton/Wenham B 5:10 --B 7:09 --B 9:08 --B 11:08 --B 1:08 --B 3:08 --B 5:09 --B 7:10 --B 9:10 -- 5 North Beverly B 5:18 --B 7:18 --B 9:17 --B 11:17 --B 1:17 --B 3:17 --B 5:17 --B 7:18 --B 9:18 -- 4 Beverly (Bus arrival)B 5:27 B 6:27 -B 7:27 B 8:27 -B 9:27 B 10:27 -B 11:27 B 12:27 -B 1:27 B 2:27 -B 3:27 B 4:27 -B 5:27 B 6:27 -B 7:27 B 8:27 -B 9:27 B 10:27 - 4 Beverly (Train departure)5:37 6:37 7:37 8:37 9:37 10:37 11:37 12:37 1:37 2:37 3:37 4:37 5:37 6:37 7:37 8:37 9:37 10:37 3 Salem 5:41 Board Rockport Train 1100/2100 at Beverly for service to Boston 6:41 7:41 -8:41 9:41 -10:41 11:41 -12:41 1:41 -2:41 3:41 -4:41 5:41 -6:41 7:41 -8:41 9:41 -10:41 3 Swampscott 5:48 6:48 7:48 -8:48 9:48 -10:48 11:48 -12:48 1:48 -2:48 3:48 -4:48 5:48 -6:48 7:48 -8:48 9:48 -10:48 2 Lynn 5:51 6:51 7:51 -8:51 9:51 -10:51 11:51 -12:51 1:51 -2:51 3:51 -4:51 5:51 -6:51 7:51 -8:51 9:51 -10:51 1A Chelsea f 6:00 f 7:00 f 8:00 -f 9:00 f 10:00 -f 11:00 f 12:00 -f 1:00 f 2:00 -f 3:00 f 4:00 -f 5:00 f 6:00 -f 7:00 f 8:00 -f 9:00 f 10:00 -f 11:00 1A North Station 6:14 7:15 8:14 -9:15 10:14 -11:15 12:14 -1:15 2:14 -3:15 4:14 -5:15 6:14 -7:15 8:14 -9:15 10:14 -11:15 1151L 1101 1151X 1153L 1103 1153X 1155L 1105 1155X 1157L 1107 1157X 1159L 1109 1159X 1161L 1111 1161X 1163L 1113 1163X 1165L 1115 1165X 1167L 1117 1167X 2151L 2101 2151X 2153L 2103 2153X 2155L 2105 2155X 2157L 2107 2157X 2159L 2109 2159X 2161L 2111 2161X 2163L 2113 2163X 2165L 2115 2165X 2167L 2117 2167X Bikes Allowed 1A North Station 5:30 6:30 Board Rockport Train 1101/2101 & change at Beverly for bus service to Newburyport 7:30 8:30 -9:30 10:30 -11:30 12:30 -1:30 2:30 -3:30 4:30 -5:30 6:30 -7:30 8:30 -10:00 11:00 - 1A Chelsea f 5:41 f 6:41 f 7:41 f 8:41 -f 9:41 f 10:41 -f 11:41 f 12:41 -f 1:41 f 2:41 -f 3:41 f 4:41 -f 5:41 f 6:41 -f 7:41 f 8:41 -f 10:11 f 11:11 - 2 Lynn 5:50 6:50 7:50 8:50 -9:50 10:50 -11:50 12:50 -1:50 2:50 -3:50 4:50 -5:50 6:50 -7:50 8:50 -10:20 11:20 - 3 Swampscott 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 -9:53 10:53 -11:53 12:53 -1:53 2:53 -3:53 4:53 -5:53 6:53 -7:53 8:53 -10:23 11:23 - 3 Salem 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 -10:00 11:00 -12:00 1:00 -2:00 3:00 -4:00 5:00 -6:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:30 11:30 - 4 Beverly (Train arrival)6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:04 11:04 12:04 1:04 2:04 3:04 4:04 5:04 6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:34 11:34 4 Beverly (Bus departure)B 6:09 -B 7:09 B 8:09 -B 9:09 B 10:09 -B 11:09 B 12:09 -B 1:09 B 2:09 -B 3:09 B 4:09 -B 5:09 B 6:09 -B 7:09 B 8:09 -B 9:09 B 10:39 -B 11:39 5 North Beverly B 6:17 --B 8:18 --B 10:19 --B 12:19 --B 2:19 --B 4:19 --B 6:19 --B 8:18 --B 10:47 -- 5 Hamilton/Wenham B 6:24 --B 8:26 --B 10:27 --B 12:28 --B 2:28 --B 4:27 --B 6:26 --B 8:26 --B 10:54 -- 6 Ipswich B 6:41 --B 8:44 --B 10:47 --B 12:48 --B 2:48 --B 4:47 --B 6:46 --B 8:44 --B 11:11 -- 7 Rowley B 6:55 --B 9:00 --B 11:04 --B 1:06 --B 3:06 --B 5:04 --B 7:02 --B 9:00 --B 11:25 -- 8 Newburyport B 7:18 -B 7:53 B 9:24 -B 9:56 B 11:31 -B 12:03 B 1:34 -B 2:03 B 3:34 -B 4:03 B 5:31 -B 5:59 B 7:28 -B 7:59 B 9:24 -B 9:53 B 11:48 -B 12:23 4 Montserrat -f 7:08 --f 9:08 --f 11:08 --f 1:08 --f 3:08 --f 5:08 --f 7:08 --f 9:08 --f 11:38 - 5 Beverly Farms -f 7:14 --f 9:14 --f 11:14 --f 1:14 --f 3:14 --f 5:14 --f 7:14 --f 9:14 --f 11:44 - 6 Manchester -B 7:20 --B 9:20 --B 11:20 --B 1:20 --B 3:20 --B 5:20 --B 7:20 --B 9:20 --B 11:50 - 7 West Gloucester -B 7:40 --B 9:40 --B 11:40 --B 1:40 --B 3:40 --B 5:40 --B 7:40 --B 9:40 --B 12:10 - 7 Gloucester -B 7:48 --B 9:48 --B 11:48 --B 1:48 --B 3:48 --B 5:48 --B 7:48 --B 9:48 --B 12:18 - 8 Rockport -B 7:48 --B 9:48 --B 11:48 --B 1:48 --B 3:48 --B 5:48 --B 7:48 --B 9:48 --B 12:18 - SALEM BIKE ROUTES N Highland Park Highland Park MunicipalMunicipal OldeOlde Salem Greens Golf CourseSalem Greens Golf Course Salem WoodsSalem Woods OffOff--road Mountain Bike Trailsroad Mountain Bike Trails (see separate map for trail details)(see separate map for trail details)Camp LionCamp Lion Salem County Salem County Club Golf CourseClub Golf CourseDeBiese DeBiese ParkPark Forest RiverForest River Conservation LandConservation Land Forest Forest River River ParkPark Conservation Conservation LandLandFurlongFurlongParkPark SalemSalem WillowsWillows WinterWinter Island Island ParkPark Waikiki B eachWaikiki Beach RegionalRegional YMCAYMCA City of Salem, Massachusetts Kimberley Driscoll, Mayor Salem Department of Planning and Community Development Salem Bicycle Path Committee SalemSalem CommonCommon City City of of SalemSalem MemorialMemorial ParkPark PeabodyPeabodyBeverlyBeverly McGrathMcGrath ParkPark Gallows HillGallows Hill ParkPark SplaineSplaine ParkPark Harmony Grove Harmony Grove CemeteryCemetery Green LawnGreen Lawn CemeteryCemetery Saint MarkSaint Mark ’’s s CemeteryCemetery KernwoodKernwood Golf CourseGolf Course Kernwood Kernwood Golf CourseGolf Course McCabe McCabe ParkPark McGlewMcGlew ParkPark Pickman Pickman ParkPark MarbleheadMarbleheadPalmerPalmer CoveCove ParkPark Collins Collins Cove Cove ParkPark NorthNorth StreetStreet ParkPark MarchMarch Street/Street/ Curtis Curtis ParkPark Patton Patton ParkPark Ledge Hill /Ledge Hill / Mack Mack ParkPark L e s lieLeslie ’’s R e tre a t P a rk s R e tre a t P a rk Salem FerrySalem Ferry to Bostonto Boston POTENTIAL INTERCOMMUNITY CONNECTION EXISTING ON-STREET BIKE LANES EXISTING OFF-STREET MULTIUSE PATH POTENTIAL OFF STREET MULTIUSE PATH EARLY ACTION ‘PILOT’BIKE ROUTE POTENTIAL ON STREETON STREET BIKE ROUTE WITH BIKE LANEBIKE LANE EXCEPT AT CONSTRICTED INTERSECTIONS POTENTIAL ON STREETON STREET BIKE ROUTE – SHARED ROADWAYSHARED ROADWAY LESS EXPERIENCED BIKERS LOWER VOLUME ROADS MORE EXPERIENCED BIKERS HIGHER VOLUME ROADS LEGEND SCHOOLS PARKS CRITICAL CROSSINGS PEDESTRIAN MALL POTENTIAL BIKE SHARE STATION LOCATIONS DOWNTOWN SALEM (refer to separate map for bike parking locations) Potential NewPotential New Bike Share StationBike Share Station at Commuter Rail Stopat Commuter Rail Stop with new Pedestrian/Railwith new Pedestrian/Rail CrossingCrossing 114114 1A1A 114114 1A1A 1A1A 1A1A 107107 107107 107107 107107 107107 107107 114114 1A1A 1A1A 1A1A 1A1A 114114 114114 114114 107107 City of SalemCity of Salem Bicycle Circulation Master PlanBicycle Circulation Master Plan Juniper CoveJuniper Cove BeachBeach LynnLynn Swampscott Swampscott DanversDanvers MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH DATA Crash NumberCity Town Name Crash DateCrash SeverityCrash TimeMax Injury Severity ReportedNumber of VehiclesAge of Driver ‐Youngest KnownAge of Driver ‐Oldest KnownDriver Contributing Circumstances (All Drivers)Light ConditionsManner of CollisionRoad Surface ConditionRoadway Junction TypeTotal FatalitiesTotal Non‐Fatal InjuriesTraffic Control Device TypeTrafficway DescriptionVehicle Actions Prior to Crash (All Vehicles)Vehicle Configuration (All Vehicles)Vehicle Travel Directions (All Vehicles)Weather ConditionsMost Harmful Event (All Vehicles)Road Contributing CircumstanceSpeed Limit Latitude LongitudeStreet NumberRoadwayNear Intersection Roadway4119625 SALEM 10/12/2015Property damage only (none injured) 8:07 PM No injury 2 25‐34 65‐74D1: (Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road)  / D2: (No improper driving) Dark ‐ lighted roadway Rear‐end DryT‐intersection 0 0No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: ParkedV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: E  / V2: Not Reported ClearV1:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic)Not reported 30 42.52609811‐70.88121413 FORT AVE / LEE FORT TR4514390 SALEM 03/03/2018Property damage only (none injured) 4:59 PM No injury 2 35‐44 35‐44D1: (No improper driving)  / D2: (No improper driving) Dark ‐ lighted roadway Angle WetNot at junction 0 0No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: ParkedV1:(Single‐unit truck (3‐or‐more axles)) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: W  / V2: ECloudy/Severe crosswindsV1:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 20 42.52628479‐70.88133765 10 LEE FORT TERRACE4041272 SALEM 03/26/2015Property damage only (none injured) 11:46 AM No injury 2 21‐24 65‐74D1: (Other improper action)  / D2: (No improper driving) Dark ‐ lighted roadway Rear‐end DryFour‐way intersection 0 0Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Slowing or stopped in trafficV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: S  / V2: SClear/CloudyV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic)Not reported 30 42.52579939‐70.88427202 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4063283 SALEM 05/17/2015Property damage only (none injured) 5:14 PM No injury 2 18‐20 55‐64D1: (Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings)  / D2: (No improper driving) Daylight Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 0Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Travelling straight aheadV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: E  / V2: NClear/CloudyV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic)Not reported 30 42.52579939‐70.88427202 WEBB ST / ESSEX ST4118554 SALEM 07/11/2015Non‐fatal injury 6:50 PMNon‐fatal injury ‐ Possible 2 55‐64 75‐84D1: (Failed to yield right of way)  / D2: (No improper driving) Daylight Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 1Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Turning left / V2: Travelling straight aheadV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Motorcycle)V1: N  / V2: SClearV1:(Collision with ditch) / V2:(Collision with ditch)Not reported 30 42.52579939‐70.88427202 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4383931 SALEM 05/27/2017Property damage only (none injured) 6:55 PM No injury 2 55‐64 65‐74D1: (No improper driving)  / D2: (Failed to yield right of way) DuskSideswipe, opposite direction DryFour‐way intersection 0 0Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Turning leftV1:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility)) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: E  / V2: NClear/ClearV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 25 42.52579939‐70.88427202 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4409550 SALEM 07/11/2017Non‐fatal injury 3:52 PMNon‐fatal injury ‐ Possible 2 35‐44 45‐54 D1: (Inattention) Dawn Rear‐end DryFour‐way intersection 0 2Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Not reportedV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility))V1: Not Reported / V2: Not ReportedClear/ClearV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 30 42.52579939‐70.88427202 WEBB STREET ESSEX STREET4445519 SALEM 10/12/2017Property damage only (none injured) 12:06 PM No injury 2 25‐34 55‐64D2: (Failed to yield right of way) Daylight Angle DryNot at junction 0 0No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Not reported / V2: Making U‐turnV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: Not Reported / V2: SClear/ClearV2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 30 42.52579939‐70.88427202 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4502988 SALEM 12/27/2017Property damage only (none injured) 3:56 PM No injury 2 25‐34 55‐64D1: (Unknown)  / D2: (Distracted) Daylight Angle SnowFour‐way intersection 0 0Traffic control signalTwo‐way, divided, unprotected V1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Travelling straight aheadV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: S  / V2: EClear/SnowV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 42.52579939‐70.88427202 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4509658 SALEM 01/02/2018Non‐fatal injury 2:40 PMNon‐fatal injury ‐ Non‐incapacitating 2 35‐44 45‐54D1: (No improper driving)  / D2: (Over‐correcting/over‐steering) Daylight Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 1Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Slowing or stopped in traffic / V2: Turning rightV1:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility)) / V2:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility))V1: Not Reported / V2: Not ReportedClear/ClearV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 25 42.52579992‐70.88426631 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4525729 SALEM 03/29/2018Non‐fatal injury 6:55 AMNon‐fatal injury ‐ Incapacitating 2 25‐34 55‐64D1: (Inattention)  / D2: (No improper driving),(No improper driving) Dawn Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 1Traffic control signalTwo‐way, divided, unprotected V1: Slowing or stopped in traffic / V2: Travelling straight aheadV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: S  / V2: WClear/ClearV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 25 42.52577269‐70.88427807 2 ESSEX STREETLee Fort Terrace at Fort AvenueWebb Street at Essex Street and Szetela Lane Crash NumberCity Town Name Crash DateCrash SeverityCrash TimeMax Injury Severity ReportedNumber of VehiclesAge of Driver ‐Youngest KnownAge of Driver ‐Oldest KnownDriver Contributing Circumstances (All Drivers)Light ConditionsManner of CollisionRoad Surface ConditionRoadway Junction TypeTotal FatalitiesTotal Non‐Fatal InjuriesTraffic Control Device TypeTrafficway DescriptionVehicle Actions Prior to Crash (All Vehicles)Vehicle Configuration (All Vehicles)Vehicle Travel Directions (All Vehicles)Weather ConditionsMost Harmful Event (All Vehicles)Road Contributing CircumstanceSpeed Limit Latitude LongitudeStreet NumberRoadwayNear Intersection Roadway4585022 SALEM 07/18/2018Property damage only (none injured) 5:06 PM No injury 2 55‐64 65‐74D1: (No improper driving)  / D2: (Made an improper turn) Daylight Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 0Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Slowing or stopped in traffic / V2: Turning rightV1:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility)) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: E  / V2: SClearV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 25 42.52579992‐70.88426631 ESSEX STREET / WEBB STREET4592308 SALEM 09/03/2018Property damage only (none injured) 5:15 PM No injury 2 45‐54 55‐64D1: (No improper driving)  / D2: (Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings) Daylight Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 0Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Travelling straight aheadV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: E  / V2: SClear/Reported but invalidV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 42.52579992‐70.88426631 WEBB STREET / ESSEX STREET4693605 SALEM 04/25/2019Non‐fatal injury 12:22 PMNon‐fatal injury ‐ Non‐incapacitating 2 21‐24 55‐64D1: (No improper driving)  / D2: (No improper driving) Daylight Angle DryFour‐way intersection 0 2Traffic control signalTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Travelling straight aheadV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: S  / V2: WClear/ClearV1:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) 42.52579992‐70.88426631 WEBB ST / ESSEX ST4063249 SALEM 04/26/2015Non‐fatal injury 1:17 AMNon‐fatal injury ‐ Non‐incapacitating 2 25‐34 25‐34D1: (Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner)  / D2: (No improper driving) Dark ‐ lighted roadway Angle DryNot at junction 0 2No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: ParkedV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: E  / V2: Not Reported ClearV1:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic)Not reported 30 42.52569288‐70.88287338 FORT AVENUE WEBB STREET4341753 SALEM 01/27/2017Property damage only (none injured) 11:56 AM No injury 2 35‐44 75‐84D1: (No improper driving),(No improper driving)  / D2: (No improper driving) DaylightSideswipe, same direction DryNot at junction 0 0No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: ParkedV1:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility)) / V2:(Passenger car)V1: Not Reported / V2: Not ReportedClear/ClearV1:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 30 42.52564976‐70.88322676 FORT AVENUE / WEBB STREET4521962 SALEM 02/16/2018Property damage only (none injured) 9:35 PM No injury 3 21‐24 21‐24D1: (Operating vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent or aggressive manner) Dark ‐ lighted roadwaySideswipe, opposite direction DryNot at junction 0 0No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: Parked / V3: ParkedV1:(Passenger car) / V2:(Passenger car) / V3:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility))V1: Not Reported / V2: Not Reported / V3: Not ReportedClear/ClearV1:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) / V2:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) None 25 42.52567955‐70.88370371 27 WEBB STREET4573558 SALEM 05/24/2018Property damage only (none injured) 7:08 PM No injury 2 55‐64 55‐64D1: (Operating defective equipment)  / D2: (No improper driving) DaylightSideswipe, same direction DryNot at junction 0 0No controlsTwo‐way, not dividedV1: Travelling straight ahead / V2: ParkedV1:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, sport utility)) / V2:(Light truck(van, mini‐van, pickup, V1: N  / V2: Not Reported ClearV1:(Collision with parked motor vehicle) / V2:(Collision with motor vehicle in traffic) None 25 42.52564024‐70.88338727 21 WEBB STREETWebb Street at Fort Avenue CITY/TOWN : Salem COUNT DATE : 2022 MHD USE ONLY DISTRICT : 4 UNSIGNALIZED : x SIGNALIZED :Source # ~ INTERSECTION DATA ~ MAJOR STREET : Fort Avenue ST # MINOR STREET(S) : Lee Fort Terrace ST # ST # ST # ST # North 2 INTERSECTION 24165 REF # 87 31 0 Peak Hour Volumes 12345 NB SB EB WB 2 87 165 254 0.080 APPROACH ADT :3,175 ADT = TOTAL VOL/"K" FACT. 2 # OF YEARS :5 AVERAGE # OF ACCIDENTS ( A ) :0.40 0.35 RATE =( A * 1,000,000 ) ( ADT * 365 ) Comments : Accident Rate for District 4 signalized intersections = 0.73 Accident Rate for District 4 unsignalized intersections = 0.57 Statewide Accident Rate for Signalized Inteserction = 0.78 and Unsignalized/Inteserction = 0.57 VOLUMES (PM) : " K " FACTOR : TOTAL # OF ACCIDENTS : CRASH RATE CALCULATION : MassHighway CRASH RATE WORKSHEET INTERSECTION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) APPROACH :Total Entering VehiclesDIRECTION : S:\Jobs\8703\2022\12 - Crash Data\Crash Rates Worksheets CITY/TOWN : Salem COUNT DATE : 2022 MHD USE ONLY DISTRICT : 4 UNSIGNALIZED : SIGNALIZED : x Source # ~ INTERSECTION DATA ~ MAJOR STREET : Essex Street/Szetela Lane ST # MINOR STREET(S) : Webb Street ST # ST # ST # ST # North 226 INTERSECTION 24344 REF # 260 31 128 Peak Hour Volumes 12345 NB SB EB WB 128 226 260 344 958 0.080 APPROACH ADT :11,975 ADT = TOTAL VOL/"K" FACT. 12 # OF YEARS :5 AVERAGE # OF ACCIDENTS ( A ) :2.40 0.55 RATE =( A * 1,000,000 ) ( ADT * 365 ) Comments : Accident Rate for District 4 signalized intersections = 0.73 Accident Rate for District 4 unsignalized intersections = 0.57 Statewide Accident Rate for Signalized Inteserction = 0.78 and Unsignalized/Inteserction = 0.57 VOLUMES (AM) : " K " FACTOR : TOTAL # OF ACCIDENTS : CRASH RATE CALCULATION : MassHighway CRASH RATE WORKSHEET INTERSECTION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) APPROACH :Total Entering VehiclesDIRECTION : S:\Jobs\8703\2022\12 - Crash Data\Crash Rates Worksheets CITY/TOWN : Salem COUNT DATE : 2022 MHD USE ONLY DISTRICT : 4 UNSIGNALIZED : x SIGNALIZED :Source # ~ INTERSECTION DATA ~ MAJOR STREET : Webb Street ST # MINOR STREET(S) : Fort Avenue ST # ST # ST # ST # North 159 INTERSECTION 24185 REF # 90 31 0 Peak Hour Volumes 12345 NB SB EB WB 159 90 185 434 0.080 APPROACH ADT :5,425 ADT = TOTAL VOL/"K" FACT. 4 # OF YEARS :5 AVERAGE # OF ACCIDENTS ( A ) :0.80 0.40 RATE =( A * 1,000,000 ) ( ADT * 365 ) Comments : Accident Rate for District 4 signalized intersections = 0.73 Accident Rate for District 4 unsignalized intersections = 0.57 Statewide Accident Rate for Signalized Inteserction = 0.78 and Unsignalized/Inteserction = 0.57 VOLUMES (PM) : " K " FACTOR : TOTAL # OF ACCIDENTS : CRASH RATE CALCULATION : MassHighway CRASH RATE WORKSHEET INTERSECTION DIAGRAM (Label Approaches) APPROACH :Total Entering VehiclesDIRECTION : S:\Jobs\8703\2022\12 - Crash Data\Crash Rates Worksheets GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS Station2015 2016 2017 2018 20192020Average Annual Growth Rate5080LocationYANKEE DIVISION HIGHWAY137883 139927 141267 139922 1421091145400.63%595LocationYANKEE DIVISION HIGHWAY130751 128910 129812 131926 1348541144320.85%5100LocationKERNWOOD STREET6353 6747 6862 6883 682356291.69%5101LocationBROAD STREET7371 7828 7961 6908 68805676-2.30%5102LocationLAFAYETTE STREET17555 16918 17104 17343 1689713923-0.58%5216LocationDERBY STREET14484 14672 17347 17590 17660146155.93%S15-001-258-01LocationHIGHLAND AVENUE31793 32206 32560 33016 33148273141.08%S15-001-258-02LocationHIGHLAND AVENUE34363 34810 35193 35686 35829295231.08%1.05%Say 1.00%(Source: MassDOT Transportation Data Management System)2020 and 2021 data were not included in the growth calculation Salem5364LynnfieldMassachusetts Highway DepartmentAADT Summary By Year for 1/1/2015 - 12/31/2021Community Station Information2021 Generated 3/2/2022 Page 1 of 1 EXISTING SITE TRIPS TO BE REMOVED Not To Scale Figure A1 Existing Site Trip to be removed N WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR WEEKDAY MORNING PEAK HOUR Peak Hour Traffic VolumesVanasse & Associates inc Transportation Impact Assessment - Proposed Residential Development - Salem, Massachusetts SITE SITE R:\8703\2022\8703NT1.dwg, 3/4/2022 12:19:12 PM TRIP DISTRIBUTION Table 3. Residence MCD/County to Workplace MCD/County Commuting Flows for the United States and Puerto Rico Sorted by Residence Geography: 5‐Year ACS, 2011‐2015Universe: Workers 16 years and over.Commuting flows are sorted by residence state, residence county, and residence minor civil division.ResidencePlace of WorkMinor Civil Division NameMinor Civil Division NameWorkers in Commuting Flow%Web Street (West)Essex Street (South)Forth Avenue (North)%Web Street (West)Essex Street (South)Forth Avenue (North)%Web Street (West)Essex Street (South)Forth Avenue (North)TotalWeb Street (West)Essex Street (South)Forth Avenue (North)Total1Salem city Salem city 6,93931.30% 0.25 0.6 0.15 1.00 0.25 0.6 0.15 1.00 1734.75 4163.4 1040.85 6939 1734.75 4163.4 1040.85 69392Salem city Boston city 3,02913.66% 1 1.00 1 1.00 3029 0 0 3029 3029 0 0 30293Salem city Peabody city 1,6907.62% 1 1.00 1 1.00 1690 0 0 1690 1690 0 0 16904Salem city Beverly city 1,6627.50% 1 1.00 1 1.00 1662 0 0 1662 1662 0 0 16625Salem city Danvers town 1,4516.54% 1 1.00 1 1.00 1451 0 0 1451 1451 0 0 14516Salem city Lynn city 1,0044.53% 0.5 0.5 1.00 0.5 0.5 1.00 502 502 0 1004 502 502 0 10047Salem city Marblehead town 4802.17% 1 1.00 0.8 0.2 1.00 0 480 0 480 0 384 96 4808Salem city Swampscott town 4411.99% 1 1.00 0.8 0.2 1.00 0 441 0 441 0 352.8 88.2 4419Salem city Cambridge city 4321.95% 1 1.00 1 1.00 432 0 0 432 432 0 0 43210Salem city Gloucester city 3471.57% 1 1.00 1 1.00 347 0 0 347 347 0 0 34711Salem city Woburn city 2531.14% 1 1.00 1 1.00 253 0 0 253 253 0 0 25312Salem city Lawrence city 2371.07% 1 1.00 1 1.00 237 0 0 237 237 0 0 23713Salem city Wilmington town 2050.92% 1 1.00 1 1.00 205 0 0 205 205 0 0 20514Salem city Saugus town 1900.86% 1 1.00 1 1.00 190 0 0 190 190 0 0 19015Salem city Andover town 1650.74% 1 1.00 1 1.00 165 0 0 165 165 0 0 16516Salem city Burlington town 1530.69% 1 1.00 1 1.00 153 0 0 153 153 0 0 15317Salem city Wakefield town 1530.69% 1 1.00 1 1.00 153 0 0 153 153 0 0 15318Salem city Waltham city 1510.68% 1 1.00 1 1.00 151 0 0 151 151 0 0 15119Salem city Middleton town 1430.65% 1 1.00 1 1.00 143 0 0 143 143 0 0 14320Salem city Framingham town 1310.59% 1 1.00 1 1.00 131 0 0 131 131 0 0 13121Salem city Manchester‐by‐the‐Sea tow1260.57% 1 1.00 1 1.00 126 0 0 126 126 0 0 12622Salem city Medford city 1260.57% 1 1.00 1 1.00 126 0 0 126 126 0 0 12623Salem city North Andover town 1220.55% 1 1.00 1 1.00 122 0 0 122 122 0 0 12224Salem city Newton city 1150.52% 1 1.00 1 1.00 115 0 0 115 115 0 0 11525Salem city Malden city 1080.49% 1 1.00 1 1.00 108 0 0 108 108 0 0 10826Salem city Haverhill city 1070.48% 1 1.00 1 1.00 107 0 0 107 107 0 0 10727Salem city North Reading town 930.42% 1 1.00 1 1.00 93 0 0 93 93 0 0 9328Salem city Everett city 910.41% 1 1.00 1 1.00 91 0 0 91 91 0 0 9129Salem city Chelsea city 890.40% 0.8 0.2 1.00 0.8 0.2 1.00 71.2 17.8 0 89 71.2 0 17.8 8930Salem city Hamilton town 840.38% 1 1.00 1 1.00 84 0 0 84 84 0 0 8431Salem city Lowell city 800.36% 1 1.00 1 1.00 80 0 0 80 80 0 0 8032Salem city Newburyport city 790.36% 1 1.00 1 1.00 79 0 0 79 79 0 0 7933Salem city Tewksbury town 790.36% 1 1.00 1 1.00 79 0 0 79 79 0 0 7934Salem city Somerville city 780.35% 1 1.00 1 1.00 78 0 0 78 78 0 0 7835Salem city Lynnfield town 770.35% 1 1.00 1 1.00 77 0 0 77 77 0 0 7736Salem city Brookline town 710.32% 1 1.00 1 1.00 71 0 0 71 71 0 0 7137Salem city Methuen Town city 640.29% 1 1.00 1 1.00 64 0 0 64 64 0 0 6438Salem city Reading town 610.28% 1 1.00 1 1.00 61 0 0 61 61 0 0 6139Salem city Ipswich town 580.26% 1 1.00 1 1.00 58 0 0 58 58 0 0 5840Salem city Billerica town 550.25% 1 1.00 1 1.00 55 0 0 55 55 0 0 5522,17014373.95 5604.2 1040.85 21019 14373.95 5402.2 1242.85 2101968.4% 26.7% 5.0% 68.4% 25.7% 5.9%65 30 510065 30 5100Trips Exiting Entering For more information on sampling and estimation methods, confidentiality protection, and sampling and nonsampling errors, see <http://www2.census.gov/programs‐surveys/acs/tech_docs/accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2015Commuting FlowMatrixExiting Entering  U.S. CENSUS DATA TRIP GENERATION 3/4/22, 12:50 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=UNITS221&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=59&edition=639&locationCode=Gene… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=UNITS221&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=59&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban…1/1 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:30 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:173 Directional Distribution:23% entering, 77% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.37 0.15 - 0.53 0.09 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.44(X) - 11.61 R²= 0.91 Trip Gen Manual,11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 100 200 300 400 5000 100 200 300 59 22 14 3/4/22, 12:50 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=UNITS221&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=59&edition=639&locationCode=Gene… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=UNITS221&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=59&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban…1/1 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:31 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:169 Directional Distribution:61% entering, 39% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.39 0.19 - 0.57 0.08 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.39(X) + 0.34 R²= 0.91 Trip Gen Manual,11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 100 200 300 400 5000 50 100 150 200 59 23 23 3/4/22, 12:50 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=UNITS221&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=59&edition=639&locationCode=Ge… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=UNITS221&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=59&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburba…1/1 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:11 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:201 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 4.54 3.76 - 5.40 0.51 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 4.77(X) - 46.46 R²= 0.93 Trip Gen Manual,11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 100 200 300 4000 500 1,000 1,500 59 268 235 3/4/22, 12:49 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=65&edition=639&locationCode=Gene… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=TASIDE&x=65&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban…1/1 Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily (252) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:9 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:73 Directional Distribution:34% entering, 66% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.20 0.13 - 0.27 0.04 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.19(X) + 0.90 R²= 0.85 Trip Gen Manual,11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 50 100 150 2000 5 10 15 20 25 30 65 13 13 3/4/22, 12:49 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=65&edition=639&locationCode=Gene… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=65&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban…1/1 Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily (252) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:9 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:73 Directional Distribution:56% entering, 44% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.25 0.16 - 0.36 0.06 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.25(X) + 0.07 R²= 0.84 Trip Gen Manual,11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 50 100 150 2000 10 20 30 40 65 16 16 3/4/22, 12:48 PM https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=65&edition=639&locationCode=Ge… https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=AWDVTE&x=65&edition=639&locationCode=General Urban/Suburba…1/1 Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily (252) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:6 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:72 Directional Distribution:50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.24 2.59 - 4.79 0.53 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 2.89(X) + 24.82 R²= 0.99 Trip Gen Manual,11th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 50 100 150 200 250 3000 200 400 600 800 65 211 213 PARKING ANALYSIS 3/4/22, 12:54 PM https://iteparkgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=ODSBD&timeperiod=OAFME&x=59&edition=416&locationCode=Gener… https://iteparkgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=221&ivlabel=ODSBD&timeperiod=OAFME&x=59&edition=416&locationCode=General Urban/Suburban (…1/1 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (221) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:Bedrooms On a:Weekday (Monday - Friday) Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban (no nearby rail transit) Peak Period of Parking Demand:10:00 p.m. - 5:00 a.m. Number of Studies:35 Avg. Num. of Bedrooms:294 Peak Period Parking Demand per Bedroom Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 0.75 0.15 (20%)0.70 - 0.80/0.870.650.41 - 1.00 Data Plot and Equation P = Parked VehiclesX = Number of Bedrooms Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: P = 0.82(X) - 20.37 R²= 0.94 Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,4000 500 1,000 1,500 59 44 28 3/4/22, 12:55 PM https://iteparkgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=OAFME&x=65&edition=416&locationCode=Gen… https://iteparkgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=252&ivlabel=UNITS252&timeperiod=OAFME&x=65&edition=416&locationCode=General Urban/Suburba…1/1 Senior Adult Housing - Attached (252) Peak Period Parking Demand vs:Dwelling Units On a:Weekday (Monday - Friday) Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Peak Period of Parking Demand:10:00 p.m. - 8:00 a.m. Number of Studies:3 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units:58 Peak Period Parking Demand per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Standard Deviation (Coeff. of Variation) 95% Confidence Interval 33rd / 85th PercentileRange of Rates 0.61 0.11 (18%)***/0.670.510.45 - 0.67 Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size P = Parked VehiclesX = Number of Dwelling Units Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: ***R²= *** Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 20 40 60 800 10 20 30 40 50 60 65 40 CAPACITY ANALYSIS Webb Street at Essex Street and Szetela Lane Webb Street at Fort Avenue Existing Site Driveways Proposed Site Driveway Webb Street at Essex Street and Szetela Lane Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Morning 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 119 81 58 90 193 61 65 57 6 1 118 107 Future Volume (vph) 119 81 58 90 193 61 65 57 6 1 118 107 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.976 0.994 0.936 Flt Protected 0.977 0.987 0.975 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1638 0 0 2023 0 0 2045 0 0 2016 0 Flt Permitted 0.618 0.827 0.679 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1036 0 0 1695 0 0 1424 0 0 2014 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 18 14 2 38 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 590 359 624 413 Travel Time (s) 16.1 9.8 17.0 11.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.58 0.58 0.58 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 153 104 74 107 230 73 92 80 8 2 203 184 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 331 0 0 410 0 0 180 0 0 389 0 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6666 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Morning 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 25.3 25.3 27.2 27.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.42 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.60 0.30 0.44 Control Delay 30.6 18.8 20.6 19.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.6 18.8 20.6 19.3 LOS CBCB Approach Delay 30.6 18.8 20.6 19.3 Approach LOS C B C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 97 34 71 Queue Length 95th (ft) 209 244 136 187 Internal Link Dist (ft) 510 279 544 333 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 904 1477 607 879 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 Storage Cap Reductn 0000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.28 0.30 0.44 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 64 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Evening 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 29 106 108 72 228 3 46 12 8 1 38 60 Future Volume (vph) 29 106 108 72 228 3 46 12 8 1 38 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.940 0.999 0.984 0.918 Flt Protected 0.994 0.988 0.966 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1624 0 0 2110 0 0 2047 0 0 1954 0 Flt Permitted 0.931 0.863 0.815 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1521 0 0 1843 0 0 1727 0 0 1948 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 1 6 65 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 590 359 624 413 Travel Time (s) 16.1 9.8 17.0 11.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 2% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 32 118 120 86 271 4 71 18 12 1 51 80 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 270 0 0 361 0 0 101 0 0 132 0 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6666 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Evening 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 11.3 11.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.33 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.37 0.18 0.20 Control Delay 9.4 11.0 14.9 10.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.4 11.0 14.9 10.0 LOS ABBB Approach Delay 9.4 11.0 14.9 10.0 Approach LOS ABBB Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 33 10 7 Queue Length 95th (ft) 135 184 53 52 Internal Link Dist (ft) 510 279 544 333 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1441 1742 1405 1596 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 Storage Cap Reductn 0000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.21 0.07 0.08 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 34.7 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 128 87 62 96 207 65 70 61 6 1 127 115 Future Volume (vph) 128 87 62 96 207 65 70 61 6 1 127 115 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.976 0.994 0.936 Flt Protected 0.977 0.987 0.975 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1638 0 0 2023 0 0 2045 0 0 2016 0 Flt Permitted 0.607 0.819 0.644 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1018 0 0 1679 0 0 1351 0 0 2014 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 18 14 2 37 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 590 359 624 413 Travel Time (s) 16.1 9.8 17.0 11.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.58 0.58 0.58 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 164 112 79 114 246 77 99 86 8 2 219 198 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 355 0 0 437 0 0 193 0 0 419 0 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6666 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 1.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 27.6 27.6 27.1 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.62 0.35 0.54 Control Delay 32.7 18.8 22.5 23.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 32.7 18.8 22.5 23.2 LOS C B C C Approach Delay 32.7 18.8 22.5 23.2 Approach LOS C B C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 96 107 41 94 Queue Length 95th (ft) 233 263 149 213 Internal Link Dist (ft) 510 279 544 333 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 867 1428 554 782 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 Storage Cap Reductn 0000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.31 0.35 0.54 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 66.2 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Evening 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 31 113 116 77 245 3 49 11 9 1 41 64 Future Volume (vph) 31 113 116 77 245 3 49 11 9 1 41 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.940 0.999 0.982 0.919 Flt Protected 0.994 0.988 0.966 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1624 0 0 2109 0 0 2043 0 0 1956 0 Flt Permitted 0.929 0.858 0.796 0.998 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1518 0 0 1832 0 0 1683 0 0 1952 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 1 6 64 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 590 359 624 413 Travel Time (s) 16.1 9.8 17.0 11.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 2% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 34 126 129 92 292 4 75 17 14 1 55 85 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 289 0 0 388 0 0 106 0 0 141 0 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6666 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 4 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Evening 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 19.8 19.8 11.9 11.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.33 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.39 0.19 0.21 Control Delay 9.6 11.3 15.7 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.6 11.3 15.7 10.8 LOS ABBB Approach Delay 9.6 11.3 15.7 10.8 Approach LOS ABBB Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 38 11 8 Queue Length 95th (ft) 149 203 57 58 Internal Link Dist (ft) 510 279 544 333 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1427 1718 1274 1491 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 Storage Cap Reductn 0000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.23 0.08 0.09 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 36.6 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Morning 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/16/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 126 86 62 102 218 65 70 60 7 1 125 112 Future Volume (vph) 126 86 62 102 218 65 70 60 7 1 125 112 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.977 0.993 0.937 Flt Protected 0.977 0.987 0.975 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1638 0 0 2025 0 0 2043 0 0 2018 0 Flt Permitted 0.599 0.814 0.627 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1004 0 0 1670 0 0 1314 0 0 2016 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 18 13 2 37 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 590 359 624 413 Travel Time (s) 16.1 9.8 17.0 11.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.58 0.58 0.58 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 162 110 79 121 260 77 99 85 10 2 216 193 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 351 0 0 458 0 0 194 0 0 411 0 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6666 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Morning 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/16/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 27.6 27.6 27.1 27.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.65 0.36 0.49 Control Delay 33.0 19.8 22.8 21.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 19.8 22.8 21.0 LOS C B C C Approach Delay 33.0 19.8 22.8 21.0 Approach LOS C B C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 115 42 85 Queue Length 95th (ft) 231 280 150 203 Internal Link Dist (ft) 510 279 544 333 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 855 1419 539 847 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 Storage Cap Reductn 0000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.32 0.36 0.49 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 66.2 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Evening 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 30 125 116 82 254 3 49 13 15 1 40 63 Future Volume (vph) 30 125 116 82 254 3 49 13 15 1 40 63 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.942 0.999 0.974 0.918 Flt Protected 0.995 0.988 0.969 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1629 0 0 2110 0 0 2032 0 0 1954 0 Flt Permitted 0.933 0.854 0.809 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1528 0 0 1823 0 0 1697 0 0 1948 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 47 1 10 66 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 590 359 624 413 Travel Time (s) 16.1 9.8 17.0 11.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 2% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 33 139 129 98 302 4 75 20 23 1 53 84 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 301 0 0 404 0 0 118 0 0 138 0 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft)6666 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 51.8% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% 26.4% Maximum Green (s) 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Evening 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 20.6 20.6 12.2 11.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.41 0.21 0.21 Control Delay 9.8 11.4 15.8 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.8 11.4 15.8 10.8 LOS ABBB Approach Delay 9.8 11.4 15.8 10.8 Approach LOS ABBB Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 41 13 8 Queue Length 95th (ft) 160 215 62 57 Internal Link Dist (ft) 510 279 544 333 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1429 1702 1260 1461 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000 Spillback Cap Reductn 0000 Storage Cap Reductn 0000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.24 0.09 0.09 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 37.6 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.41 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Essex Street/Szetela Lane & Webb Street Webb Street at Fort Avenue HCM 6th TWSC 1 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Morning 6: Webb Street & Fort Avenue 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 85 3 0 159 185 0 Future Vol, veh/h 85 3 0 159 185 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Free - None - None Storage Length - 80 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 47 47 84 84 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 00610 Mvmt Flow 181 6 0 189 218 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 181 0 370 181 Stage 1 - - - - 181 - Stage 2 - - - - 189 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.41 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.41 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.509 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 1407 - 632 867 Stage 1 - 0 - - 853 - Stage 2 - 0 - - 846 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1407 - 632 867 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 632 - Stage 1 - - - - 853 - Stage 2 - - - - 846 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 13.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 632 - 1407 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.344 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.7 - 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 2 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Evening 6: Webb Street & Fort Avenue 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 98 17 0 142 161 1 Future Vol, veh/h 98 17 0 142 161 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Free - None - None Storage Length - 80 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 83 83 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 00210 Mvmt Flow 126 22 0 171 201 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 126 0 297 126 Stage 1 - - - - 126 - Stage 2 - - - - 171 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.41 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.41 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.509 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 1473 - 696 930 Stage 1 - 0 - - 902 - Stage 2 - 0 - - 861 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1473 - 696 930 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 696 - Stage 1 - - - - 902 - Stage 2 - - - - 861 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 697 - 1473 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.291 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.3 - 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 3 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning 6: Webb Street & Fort Avenue 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 91 3 0 170 198 0 Future Vol, veh/h 91 3 0 170 198 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Free - None - None Storage Length - 80 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 47 47 84 84 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 00610 Mvmt Flow 194 6 0 202 233 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 194 0 396 194 Stage 1 - - - - 194 - Stage 2 - - - - 202 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.41 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.41 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.509 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 1391 - 611 853 Stage 1 - 0 - - 841 - Stage 2 - 0 - - 834 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1391 - 611 853 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 611 - Stage 1 - - - - 841 - Stage 2 - - - - 834 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 611 - 1391 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.381 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.5 - 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 4 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Evening 6: Webb Street & Fort Avenue 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 105 18 0 152 173 1 Future Vol, veh/h 105 18 0 152 173 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Free - None - None Storage Length - 80 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 83 83 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 00210 Mvmt Flow 135 23 0 183 216 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 135 0 318 135 Stage 1 - - - - 135 - Stage 2 - - - - 183 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.41 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.41 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.509 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 1462 - 677 919 Stage 1 - 0 - - 894 - Stage 2 - 0 - - 851 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1462 - 677 919 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 677 - Stage 1 - - - - 894 - Stage 2 - - - - 851 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 678 - 1462 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.321 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.8 - 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 5 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Morning 6: Webb Street & Fort Avenue 03/16/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 91 3 0 187 198 0 Future Vol, veh/h 91 3 0 187 198 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Free - None - None Storage Length - 80 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 47 47 84 84 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 00610 Mvmt Flow 194 6 0 223 233 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 194 0 417 194 Stage 1 - - - - 194 - Stage 2 - - - - 223 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.41 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.509 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 1391 - 595 853 Stage 1 - 0 - - 841 - Stage 2 - 0 - - 816 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1391 - 595 853 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 595 - Stage 1 - - - - 841 - Stage 2 - - - - 816 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 595 - 1391 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.391 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.9 - 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 6 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Evening 6: Webb Street & Fort Avenue 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 123 18 0 166 173 1 Future Vol, veh/h 123 18 0 166 173 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Free - None - None Storage Length - 80 - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 83 83 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 00210 Mvmt Flow 158 23 0 200 216 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - 158 0 358 158 Stage 1 - - - - 158 - Stage 2 - - - - 200 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.41 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.41 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.509 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 1434 - 642 893 Stage 1 - 0 - - 873 - Stage 2 - 0 - - 836 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1434 - 642 893 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 642 - Stage 1 - - - - 873 - Stage 2 - - - - 836 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 13.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 643 - 1434 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.338 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 13.4 - 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 - 0 - Existing Site Driveways HCM 6th TWSC 1 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Morning 8: Szetela Lane & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement NBL NBR NET NER SWL SWT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 4 234 2 0 221 Future Vol, veh/h 4 4 234 2 0 221 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 50 50 58 58 53 53 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 01000 Mvmt Flow 8 8 403 3 0 417 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 822 405 0 0 406 0 Stage 1 405 ----- Stage 2 417 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 346 650 - - 1164 - Stage 1 678 ----- Stage 2 669 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 346 650 - - 1164 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 346 ----- Stage 1 678 ----- Stage 2 669 ----- Approach NB NE SW HCM Control Delay, s 13.3 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NET NERNBLn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h) - - 452 1164 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.035 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 1 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Morning 9: Fort Avenue & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 79 157 8 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 6 79 157 8 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 72 72 74 74 50 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 25000 Mvmt Flow 8 110 212 11 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 223 0 - 0 344 218 Stage 1 - - - - 218 - Stage 2 - - - - 126 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1358 - - - 657 827 Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1358 - - - 653 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 653 - Stage 1 - - - - 818 - Stage 2 - - - - 905 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1358 - - - 827 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 HCM 6th TWSC 1 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Morning 14: Szetela Lane & Site Parking lot 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 236 1 0 225 1 0 Future Vol, veh/h 236 1 0 225 1 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 58 58 56 56 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 00000 Mvmt Flow 407 2 0 402 4 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 409 0 810 408 Stage 1 - - - - 408 - Stage 2 - - - - 402 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1161 - 352 648 Stage 1 - - - - 676 - Stage 2 - - - - 680 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1161 - 352 648 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 352 - Stage 1 - - - - 676 - Stage 2 - - - - 680 - Approach NB SB NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 15.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRNWLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 352 1161 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.011 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 2 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Evening 8: Szetela Lane & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement NBL NBR NET NER SWL SWT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 43 1 0 97 Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 43 1 0 97 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 50 50 75 75 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00230 Mvmt Flow 4 0 57 1 0 128 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 186 58 0 0 58 0 Stage 1 58 ----- Stage 2 128 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.13 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.227 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 808 1014 - - 1540 - Stage 1 970 ----- Stage 2 903 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 808 1014 - - 1540 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 808 ----- Stage 1 970 ----- Stage 2 903 ----- Approach NB NE SW HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NET NERNBLn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h) - - 808 1540 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 2 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Evening 9: Fort Avenue & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 96 141 1 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 96 141 1 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 60 60 81 81 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 53000 Mvmt Flow 5 160 174 1 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 175 0 - 0 345 175 Stage 1 - - - - 175 - Stage 2 - - - - 170 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - - 656 874 Stage 1 - - - - 860 - Stage 2 - - - - 865 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - - 653 874 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 653 - Stage 1 - - - - 857 - Stage 2 - - - - 865 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 9.1 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1414 - - - 874 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 9.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 HCM 6th TWSC 2 - 2022 Existing Conditions Weekday Evening 14: Szetela Lane & Site Parking lot 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 0 0 99 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 44 0 0 99 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 75 75 79 79 50 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 00200 Mvmt Flow 59 0 0 125 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 59 0 184 59 Stage 1 - - - - 59 - Stage 2 - - - - 125 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1558 - 810 1012 Stage 1 - - - - 969 - Stage 2 - - - - 906 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1558 - 810 1012 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 810 - Stage 1 - - - - 969 - Stage 2 - - - - 906 - Approach NB SB NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRNWLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1558 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio ----- HCM Control Delay (s) - - 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 3 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning 8: Szetela Lane & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement NBL NBR NET NER SWL SWT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 4 251 2 0 238 Future Vol, veh/h 4 4 251 2 0 238 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 50 50 58 58 53 53 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 01000 Mvmt Flow 8 8 433 3 0 449 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 884 435 0 0 436 0 Stage 1 435 ----- Stage 2 449 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 318 625 - - 1134 - Stage 1 657 ----- Stage 2 647 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 318 625 - - 1134 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 318 ----- Stage 1 657 ----- Stage 2 647 ----- Approach NB NE SW HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NET NERNBLn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h) - - 422 1134 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.038 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.9 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 3 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning 9: Fort Avenue & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 85 168 8 0 2 Future Vol, veh/h 6 85 168 8 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 72 72 74 74 50 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 25000 Mvmt Flow 8 118 227 11 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 238 0 - 0 367 233 Stage 1 - - - - 233 - Stage 2 - - - - 134 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1341 - - - 637 811 Stage 1 - - - - 810 - Stage 2 - - - - 897 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1341 - - - 633 811 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 633 - Stage 1 - - - - 805 - Stage 2 - - - - 897 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 9.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1341 - - - 811 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 9.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 HCM 6th TWSC 3 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning 14: Szetela Lane & Site Parking lot 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 253 1 0 242 1 0 Future Vol, veh/h 253 1 0 242 1 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 58 58 56 56 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 00000 Mvmt Flow 436 2 0 432 4 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 438 0 869 437 Stage 1 - - - - 437 - Stage 2 - - - - 432 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1133 - 325 624 Stage 1 - - - - 655 - Stage 2 - - - - 659 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1133 - 325 624 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 325 - Stage 1 - - - - 655 - Stage 2 - - - - 659 - Approach NB SB NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 16.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRNWLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 325 1133 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.012 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - C A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 4 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Evening 8: Szetela Lane & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement NBL NBR NET NER SWL SWT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 46 1 0 104 Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 46 1 0 104 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 50 50 75 75 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00230 Mvmt Flow 4 0 61 1 0 137 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 199 62 0 0 62 0 Stage 1 62 ----- Stage 2 137 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.13 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.227 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 794 1009 - - 1535 - Stage 1 966 ----- Stage 2 895 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 794 1009 - - 1535 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 794 ----- Stage 1 966 ----- Stage 2 895 ----- Approach NB NE SW HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NET NERNBLn1 SWL SWT Capacity (veh/h) - - 794 1535 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.6 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 4 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Evening 9: Fort Avenue & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 103 151 1 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 103 151 1 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 60 60 81 81 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 53000 Mvmt Flow 5 172 186 1 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 187 0 - 0 369 187 Stage 1 - - - - 187 - Stage 2 - - - - 182 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1399 - - - 635 860 Stage 1 - - - - 850 - Stage 2 - - - - 854 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1399 - - - 632 860 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 632 - Stage 1 - - - - 847 - Stage 2 - - - - 854 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 9.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1399 - - - 860 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 HCM 6th TWSC 4 - 2029 No-Build Conditions Weekday Evening 14: Szetela Lane & Site Parking lot 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 0 0 106 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 47 0 0 106 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 75 75 79 79 50 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 00200 Mvmt Flow 63 0 0 134 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 63 0 197 63 Stage 1 - - - - 63 - Stage 2 - - - - 134 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1553 - 796 1007 Stage 1 - - - - 965 - Stage 2 - - - - 897 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1553 - 796 1007 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 796 - Stage 1 - - - - 965 - Stage 2 - - - - 897 - Approach NB SB NW HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRNWLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1553 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio ----- HCM Control Delay (s) - - 0 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 - Proposed Site Driveway HCM 6th TWSC 5 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Morning 9: Fort Avenue & Lee Fort Terrace 03/16/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 85 168 1 1 19 Future Vol, veh/h 6 85 168 1 1 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 72 72 74 74 50 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 25000 Mvmt Flow 8 118 227 1 2 38 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 228 0 - 0 362 228 Stage 1 - - - - 228 - Stage 2 - - - - 134 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 641 816 Stage 1 - - - - 815 - Stage 2 - - - - 897 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1352 - - - 637 816 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 637 - Stage 1 - - - - 810 - Stage 2 - - - - 897 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 9.7 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1352 - - - 805 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.05 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 9.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 HCM 6th TWSC 6 - 2029 Build Conditions Weekday Evening 9: Fort Avenue & Lee Fort Terrace 03/09/2022 S:\Jobs\8703\2022\7 - Traffic Analysis\1 - 8703 analysis.syn Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 103 151 2 1 15 Future Vol, veh/h 21 103 151 2 1 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 60 60 81 81 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 53000 Mvmt Flow 35 172 186 2 4 60 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 429 187 Stage 1 - - - - 187 - Stage 2 - - - - 242 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 - - - 587 860 Stage 1 - - - - 850 - Stage 2 - - - - 803 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 - - - 571 860 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 571 - Stage 1 - - - - 826 - Stage 2 - - - - 803 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 9.7 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1398 - - - 834 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - - 0.077 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 9.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.2 Appendix E PHIUS+ 2018 Verification Baseline WUFI Report Prepared by Linnean Solutions PHIUS+ 2018 Verification Proposed WUFI Report Prepared by Linnean Solutions PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 1 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 1 BUILDING INFORMATION Category: Status: Building type: Year of construction: Units: Number of occupants: Occupant density: Residential In planning New construction 124 334 (Design) 344.3 ft²/Person Boundary conditions Climate: Internal heat gains: Interior temperature: Overheat temperature: BEVERLY MUNI MA 1.2 Btu/hr ft² 68 °F 77 °F Building geometry Enclosed volume: Net-volume: Total area envelope: Area/Volume Ratio: Floor area: Envelope area/iCFA: 1,476,473 ft³ 1,300,000 ft³ 124,356.5 ft² 0.1 1/ft 115,000 ft² 1.081 PASSIVEHOUSE REQUIREMENTS Certificate criteria:PHIUS+ 2018 Heating demand specific: target: total: 11.17 kBtu/ft²yr 5.7 kBtu/ft²yr 1,283,922.14 kBtu/yr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cooling demand sensible: latent: specific: target: total: 2.29 kBtu/ft²yr 0.36 kBtu/ft²yr 2.66 kBtu/ft²yr 6.9 kBtu/ft²yr 305,314.6 kBtu/yr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Heating load specific: target: total: 8.91 Btu/hr ft² 4.9 Btu/hr ft² 1,024,204.33 Btu/hr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cooling load specific: target: total: 3.03 Btu/hr ft² 2.8 Btu/hr ft² 348,920.17 Btu/hr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 2 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 2 Source energy total: specific: target: total: specific: 1,410,778.9 kWh/yr 4,224 kWh/Person yr 3,840 kWh/Person yr 4,813,302.29 kBtu/yr 41.86 kBtu/ft²yr 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Site energy total: specific: total: specific: 2,674,056.83 kBtu/yr 23.25 kBtu/ft²yr 783,766.06 kWh/yr 6.82 kWh/ft² 0 4.17 8.33 12.5 16.67 20.83 25 Air tightness ACH50: CFM50 per envelope area: target: target CFM50: 1.78 1/hr 0.31 cfm/ft² 0.34 1/hr 0.06 cfm/ft² 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 PASSIVEHOUSE RECOMMENDATIONS Sensible recovery efficiency:70.1 % 50 60 70 80 90 100 Frequency of overheating:19.3 % 0 5 10 15 20Cooling system is required Frequency of overheating only applies if there is not a [properly sized] cooling system installed. PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 3 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 3 BUILDING ELEMENTS Windows Average SHGC: Average solar reduction factor heating: Average solar reduction factor cooling: Average U-value: Total glazing area: Total window area: 0.45 0.5 0.45 0.376 Btu/hr ft² °F 11,155.5 ft² 14,934.1 ft² -300000-240000-180000-120000-60000 0 60000 120000 180000 SKYLIGHT WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH LOSS GAINHeat gain/loss heating period: [kBtu/yr] HVAC Total heating demand: Total cooling demand: Total DHW energy demand: Solar DHW contribution: Auxiliary electricity: 1,283,922 kBtu/yr 305,315 kBtu/yr 628,441 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 230,299 kBtu/yr 0 300000 600000 900000 1200000 1500000 [kBtu/yr]Electricity Direct heating / DHW: Heatpump heating: Cooling: HVAC auxiliary energy: Appliances: Renewable generation, coincident production and use: Total electricity demand: 18,420 kWh/yr 180,517 kWh/yr 25,053 kWh/yr 67,501 kWh/yr 492,275 kWh/yr 0 kWh/yr 783,766 kWh/yr 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 [kWh/yr] HEAT FLOW - HEATING PERIOD Heat gains Solar: Inner sources: Credit of thermal bridges: Mechanical heating: 611,634 kBtu/yr 805,502 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 1,283,922 kBtu/yr Solar 25 % Inner sources 33 % Credit of thermal bridges 0 % Mechanical heating 42 % Heat losses Opaque building envelope: Windows & Doors: Natural ventilation: Mechanical ventilation: 758,762 kBtu/yr 1,011,680 kBtu/yr 516,916 kBtu/yr 413,700 kBtu/yr Opaque building envelope 28 % Windows & Doors 37 % Natural ventilation 19 % Mechanical ventilation 15 % PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 4 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 4 CLIMATE Latitude: Longitude: Elevation of weather station: Elevation of building site: Heat capacity air: Daily temperature swing summer: Average wind speed: 42.6 ° -70.9 ° 111.5 ft 39 ft 0.018 Btu/ft³F 17.3 °F 13.1 ft/s Ground Average ground surface temperature: Amplitude ground surface temperature: Ground thermal conductivity: Ground heat capacity: Depth below grade of groundwater: Flow rate groundwater: 50.2 °F 59.2 °F 1.2 Btu/hr ft °F 29.8 Btu/ft³F 9.8 ft 0.2 ft/d 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-20 0 20 40 60 80 MonthTemperature [°F]Ambient Dew point Sky Ground 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120 15 30 45 60 MonthRadiation [kBtu/ft²Month]North East South West Global Calculation parameters Length of heating period 303 days/yr Heating degree hours 162.7 kFh/a Phase shift months 1.2 mths Time constant heating demand 83.2 hr Time constant cooling demand 0 hr Time constant cooling demand with night ventilation 0 hr Climate for Heating load 1 Heating load 2 Cooling Temperature [°F]5.5 15.4 80.1 Solar radiation North [Btu/hr ft²]12.7 10.1 20.3 Solar radiation East [Btu/hr ft²]25.4 15.2 46.6 Solar radiation South [Btu/hr ft²]71.3 33.3 51 Solar radiation West [Btu/hr ft²]29.5 16.5 52 Solar radiation Global [Btu/hr ft²]31.4 20 86.9 Relevant boundary conditions for heating load calculation: Heating load 1 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 5 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 5 ANNUAL HEAT DEMAND ANNUAL COOLING DEMAND Transmission losses : Ventilation losses: Total heat losses: 1,770,442 kBtu/yr 930,615 kBtu/yr 2,701,058 kBtu/yr Solar heat gains: Internal heat gains: Total heat gains: 753,412 kBtu/yr 992,220 kBtu/yr 1,745,633 kBtu/yr Utilization factor:81.2 % Useful heat gains:1,417,136 kBtu/yr Annual heat demand: Specific annual heat demand: 1,283,922 kBtu/yr 11,165.6 Btu/ft²yr Solar heat gains: Internal heat gains: Total heat gains: 876,836 kBtu/yr 1,255,818 kBtu/yr 2,132,653 kBtu/yr Transmission losses : Ventilation losses: Total heat losses: 2,566,120 kBtu/yr 2,624,925 kBtu/yr 5,191,045 kBtu/yr Utilization factor:36 % Useful heat losses:1,868,895 kBtu/yr Cooling demand - sensible: Cooling demand - latent: Annual cooling demand: Specific annual cooling demand: 263,758 kBtu/yr 41,557 kBtu/yr 305,315 kBtu/yr 2.7 kBtu/ft²yr 0 600000 1200000 1800000 2400000 3000000 WINTER ENERGY BALANCE kBtu/yr [kBtu/yr]WALLS ROOF WINDOWS VENTILAT. S. WIN. W. WIN. INTERNAL G. HEATING 0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 SUMMER ENERGY BALANCE kBtu/yr [kBtu/yr]WALLS WINDOWS VENTILAT. COOLING-sensi ble N. WIN. E. WIN. S. WIN. W. WIN. OPAQUE INTERNAL G. PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 6 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 6 SPECIFIC HEAT/COOLING DEMAND MONTHLY 0 1 2 3 4 [kBtu/ft²]JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberheating cooling Month Heating [kBtu/ft²] Cooling [kBtu/ft²] January 3.4 0 February 2.5 0 March 0.9 0 April 0.6 0 May 0.1 0 June 0 0.2 July 0 0.7 August 0 1.4 September 0 0.2 October 0.5 0 November 0.9 0 December 2.2 0 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 7 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 7 HEATING LOAD COOLING LOAD First climate Second climate Transmission heat losses: Ventilation heat losses: Total heat loss: 605,919.1 Btu/hr 588,540 Btu/hr 1,194,459.1 Btu/hr 510,717.7 Btu/hr 494,897.5 Btu/hr 1,005,615.2 Btu/hr Solar heat gain: Internal heat gain: Total heat gains cooling: 150,292.6 Btu/hr 143,372.3 Btu/hr 293,664.8 Btu/hr Solar heat gain: Internal heat gain: Total heat gains heating: Heating load: 111,927.1 Btu/hr 58,327.7 Btu/hr 170,254.8 Btu/hr 1,024,204.3 Btu/hr 61,170.1 Btu/hr 58,327.7 Btu/hr 119,497.8 Btu/hr 886,117.4 Btu/hr Transmission heat losses: Ventilation heat losses: Total heat loss: -20,521.9 Btu/hr -34,733.4 Btu/hr -55,255.3 Btu/hr Cooling load - sensible: Cooling load - latent: 348,920.2 Btu/hr 0 Btu/hr Relevant heating load: Specific heating load: 1,024,204.3 Btu/hr 8.9 Btu/hr ft² Relevant cooling load: Specific maximum cooling load: 348,920.2 Btu/hr 3 Btu/hr ft² 0 300000 600000 900000 1200000 WINTER ENERGY BALANCE Btu/hr [Btu/hr]WALLS ROOF WINDOWS VENTILAT. INTERNAL G. HEATING -80000 0 80000 160000 240000 320000 400000 SUMMER ENERGY BALANCE Btu/hr [Btu/hr]COOLING OPAQUE N. WIN. E. WIN. S. WIN. W. WIN. INTERNAL G. PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 8 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 8 AREAS Transmission heat losses - areas Name Area [ft²] Average U-value [Btu/hr ft² °F] Absorption coefficient Emission coefficient Reduction factor shading [%] Transmission losses heating [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses cooling [kBtu/yr] VC.1: SE (A143.1°, 7762.8 ft², width 32.906 ft)7762.8 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 69392.4 99934.8 VC.1: SE (A153.1°, 2809.17 ft², width 4 ft)2809.2 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 25111.4 36164 VC.1: NW (A332.9°, 134 ft², width 4 ft)134 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 1197.8 1725.1 VC.1: NE (A63.1°, 6648.85 ft², width 9.12 ft)6648.8 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 59434.6 85594.2 VC.1: NW (A333.1°, 356 ft², width 4 ft)356 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 3182.3 4583 VC.1: SW (A243.1°, 5520.48 ft², width 33.3 ft)5520.5 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 49348.1 71068.1 VC.1: SW (A233.1°, 5399.5 ft², width 25.029 ft)5399.5 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 48266.7 69510.8 VC.1: NE (A53.1°, 4062.85 ft², width 33.166 ft)4062.9 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 36318.2 52303.3 VC.1: NW (A323.1°, 9276.22 ft², width 35 ft)9276.2 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 82921 119417.8 VC.1: NE (A60°, 281.1 ft², width 16.116 ft)281.1 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 2512.7 3618.7 VC.1: SE (A150°, 184.94 ft², width 18.494 ft)184.9 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 1653.2 2380.8 VC.1: NW (A330°, 178.39 ft², width 17.839 ft)178.4 0.05 0.4 0.9 100 1594.7 2296.5 VC.2: Horizontal (33404.08 ft², width 3.995 ft)33404.1 0.031 0.4 0.9 100 188578.3 271579.3 VC.4: Horizontal (28632.53 ft², width 3.995 ft)28632.5 0.027 0.4 0.9 100 140740.9 202686.7 VC.5: Horizontal (2627.43 ft², width 127.72 ft)2627.4 0.168 0 0 0 36052.6 68355.9 VC.6: Horizontal (2144.11 ft², width 37.1 ft)2144.1 0.032 0 0 0 12457.4 17940.4 Degree hours [kFh/a] Heating Cooling Ambient heating 100.2 144.3 Ground heating 45.5 86.2 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 Transmission heat losses - areas [kBtu/yr] VC.1: SE (A143.1°, 7762.8 ft², width 32.906 ft) VC.1: SE (A153.1°, 2809.17 ft², width 4 ft) VC.1: NW (A332.9°, 134 ft², width 4 ft) VC.1: NE (A63.1°, 6648.85 ft², width 9.12 ft) VC.1: NW (A333.1°, 356 ft², width 4 ft) VC.1: SW (A243.1°, 5520.48 ft², width 33.3 ft) VC.1: SW (A233.1°, 5399.5 ft², width 25.029 ft) VC.1: NE (A53.1°, 4062.85 ft², width 33.166 ft) VC.1: NW (A323.1°, 9276.22 ft², width 35 ft) VC.1: NE (A60°, 281.1 ft², width 16.116 ft) VC.1: SE (A150°, 184.94 ft², width 18.494 ft) VC.1: NW (A330°, 178.39 ft², width 17.839 ft) VC.2: Horizontal (33404.08 ft², width 3.995 ft) VC.4: Horizontal (28632.53 ft², width 3.995 ft) VC.5: Horizontal (2627.43 ft², width 127.72 ft) VC.6: Horizontal (2144.11 ft², width 37.1 ft) Heating period Cooling period THERMAL BRIDGES Transmission heat losses - thermal bridges Name Length [ft] Psi-value [Btu/hr ft °F] Transmission losses [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses cooling [kBtu/yr] PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 9 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 9 WINDOWS Transmission heat losses - windows Name Quan- tity Incli- nation [°] U-value total [Btu/hr ft² °F] SHGC (perpen- dicular) Reduction factor shading [%] Reduction factor shading summer [%] Solar gain heating [kBtu/yr] Solar gain cooling [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses heating [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses cooling [kBtu/yr] VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 12.1 ft², width 2.419 ft)16 90 0.363 0.5 64.2 59.5 4,328.6 5,153 12,661.2 18,233.9 VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)92 90 0.365 0.5 74.7 64.7 34,340.2 39,622.3 81,128.8 116,836.9 VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft)3 90 0.376 0.5 76.4 65.5 4,195.6 4,822.7 8,143.8 11,728.2 VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)8 90 0.365 0.5 91.9 73.6 6,715.1 7,023.3 7,054.7 10,159.7 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 55.62 ft², width 7.416 ft)33 90 0.379 0.5 95.1 81.6 66,198.8 77,127.3 125,395.9 180,587.7 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft)100 90 0.364 0.5 85.2 72.3 33,570.5 39,081 87,154.4 125,514.5 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 66.13 ft², width 8.817 ft)4 90 0.38 0.5 97 83.1 9,809.5 11,517.7 18,121.1 26,096.9 VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 19.89 ft², width 2.652 ft)24 90 0.367 0.5 88.3 76.1 26,712.1 29,353.7 31,584.5 45,486.1 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 11.8 ft², width 2.36 ft)24 90 0.362 0.5 68 50.9 12,326.9 13,132.8 18,505.1 26,650 VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)48 90 0.365 0.5 85.8 73.9 33,394 36,692.6 42,328.1 60,958.4 VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)8 90 0.379 0.5 85.4 74 29,589.1 32,551.1 30,747.7 44,281 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 22.87 ft², width 3.049 ft)2 90 0.369 0.5 88.1 75 1,313.2 1,529.7 3,045.5 4,385.9 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft)48 90 0.365 0.5 89.7 74.8 39,062.6 42,575.4 43,427.8 62,542.1 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 23.68 ft², width 4.735 ft)8 90 0.372 0.5 67.5 58.4 8,369.8 9,707.3 12,707 18,299.9 VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)20 90 0.379 0.5 81.5 69.8 43,708.9 50,241.8 76,869.2 110,702.5 VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)40 90 0.365 0.5 74.7 65.6 13,546.8 17,208.1 35,273.4 50,798.6 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)40 90 0.365 0.5 83.5 70.3 25,819 29,758 35,273.4 50,798.6 VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)16 90 0.379 0.5 81.3 70.5 31,776.5 40,058.2 61,495.4 88,562 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)16 90 0.379 0.5 85.6 71.5 56,712.4 65,228.6 61,495.3 88,561.9 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 11.84 ft², width 2.368 ft)8 90 0.362 0.5 63.8 47.1 3,457.6 3,851.7 6,187.9 8,911.4 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)16 90 0.379 0.5 82 70.2 61,235.8 67,154.2 61,495.4 88,562 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft)30 90 0.364 0.5 83.8 70.6 21,725.8 23,727 26,146.3 37,654.4 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)8 90 0.365 0.5 84.7 72.4 2,701.8 3,153.8 7,054.7 10,159.7 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)8 90 0.365 0.5 62.2 47.4 4,465.3 4,770.4 7,054.7 10,159.7 VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft)36 90 0.365 0.5 90.5 72.8 30,717.8 32,164.9 32,570.8 46,906.5 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft)3 90 0.376 0.5 92.8 75.9 7,905.2 9,062.7 8,143.7 11,728.1 VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 132.5 ft², width 11.172 ft)6 90 0.443 0.5 62.3 60.7 45,740.1 58,496.2 63,559.3 91,534.3 VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 88.68 ft², width 7.455 ft)1 90 0.441 0.5 55.5 50.7 4,529.5 5,674.6 7,054.8 10,160 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 10 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 10 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 Transmission heat losses - windows [kBtu/yr] VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 12.1 ft², width 2.419 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 55.62 ft², width 7.416 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 66.13 ft², width 8.817 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 19.89 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 11.8 ft², width 2.36 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 22.87 ft², width 3.049 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 23.68 ft², width 4.735 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 11.84 ft², width 2.368 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 132.5 ft², width 11.172 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 88.68 ft², width 7.455 ft) Heating period Cooling period PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 11 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 11 0 15000 30000 45000 60000 75000 90000 Solar gain by windows [kBtu/yr] VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 12.1 ft², width 2.419 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 55.62 ft², width 7.416 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 66.13 ft², width 8.817 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 19.89 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 11.8 ft², width 2.36 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 22.87 ft², width 3.049 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 23.68 ft², width 4.735 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 11.84 ft², width 2.368 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 132.5 ft², width 11.172 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 88.68 ft², width 7.455 ft) Heating period Cooling period PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 12 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 12 Summary building envelope Total area / length Average U-value / Psi value Transmission losses Exterior wall ambient: Exterior wall ground: Basement: Roof: Windows: Doors: Thermal bridge ambient: Thermal bridge perimeter: Thermal bridge floor slab: 71,246.8 ft² 0 ft² 2,627.4 ft² 33,404.1 ft² 14,934.1 ft² 0 ft² 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0.041 Btu/hr ft² °F 0 Btu/hr ft² °F 0.168 Btu/hr ft² °F 0.031 Btu/hr ft² °F 0.376 Btu/hr ft² °F 0 Btu/hr ft² °F 0 Btu/hr ft °F 0 Btu/hr ft °F 0 Btu/hr ft °F 521,674.1 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 36,052.6 kBtu/yr 188,578.3 kBtu/yr 1,011,679.8 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr Shading Heating Cooling Reduction factor North: Reduction factor East: Reduction factor South: Reduction factor West: Reduction factor Horizontal: 91.8 % 78 % 77.5 % 84.4 % 100 % 78.4 % 67.6 % 66.6 % 71.6 % 100 % PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 13 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 13 System DHW Heating Total Covered DHW demand [%] Estimated solar fraction [%] Final energy demand [kBtu/yr] Covered heating demand [%] Estimated solar fraction [%] Final energy demand [kBtu/yr] Performance ratio CO2 equivalent emissions [lb/yr] Source energy demand [kBtu/yr] Heat pump, BASELINE HPWH 0 0 0 90 0 384,791.5 0 169,078,653 692,624.6 Heat pump, BASELINE HPWH 0 0 0 10 0 42,754.6 0 18,786,517 76,958.3 Heat pump, BASELINE HPWH 80 0 167,416.7 0 0 0 0.3 73,563,434.8 301,350 Heat pump, BASELINE HPWH 10 0 20,927.1 0 0 0 0.3 9,195,429.3 37,668.7 DHW Electric heating, 13.5 kW backup heat 10 0 62,844.1 0 0 0 1 27,613,901.9 113,119.4 100 0 251,187.8 100 0 427,546.1 298,237,936 1,221,721 Heat pump 0 % Heat pump 0 % Heat pump 67 % Heat pump 8 % DHW Electric heating 25 % Heat pump 90 % Heat pump 10 %Heat pump 0 %Heat pump 0 % DHW Electric heating 0 % DHW - final energy Heating - final energy COOLING UNITS sensible latent Air cooling: Recirculation cooling: Additional dehumidification: Panel cooling: Sum: 0 kBtu/ft²yr 2.3 kBtu/ft²yr 0 kBtu/ft²yr 2.3 kBtu/ft²yr 0 kBtu/ft²yr 0 kBtu/ft²yr 0.3 kBtu/ft²yr 0.4 kBtu/ft²yr PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 14 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 14 VENTILATION Energy transportable by supply air Heating energy transportable: load: 1.49 W/ft² 2.61 W/ft²0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cooling energy transportable: load: 0.84 W/ft² 0.89 W/ft²0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Infiltration pressure test ACH50:1.78 1/hr Total extract air demand:7,210 cfm Supply air per person:18 cfm Occupancy:334 Average air flow rate:7,210 cfm Average air change rate:0.33 1/hr Effective ACH ambient:0.22 1/hr Effective ACH ground:0 1/hr Energetically effective air exchange:0.22 1/hr Infiltration air change rate:0.12 1/hr Infiltration air change rate (heating load):0.31 1/hr Type of ventilation system:Balanced PH ventilation Wind screening coefficient (e):0.07 Wind exposure factor:15 Wind shield factor:0.05 Ventilation heat losses:839,612.03 kBtu/yr Devices Name Sensible recovery efficiency [-] Electric efficiency [W/cfm] Heat recovery efficiency SHX [-] Effective recovery efficiency [-] BASELINE ERV 0.7 0.04 0 0.7 Altogether 0.7 0.04 0 0.7 Ducts Name Length (total) [ft] Clear cross-section [ft²] U-value [Btu/hr ft² °F] Assigned ventilation units Supply / outdoor air duct 25 2.5 1.38 BASELINE ERV Extract / Exhaust air duct 25 2.5 1.38 BASELINE ERV 50 *length * quantity ** thermal conductivity / thickness SUMMER VENTILATION ACH night ventilation:0 1/hr ACH natural summer:0 1/hr Mechanical ventilation summer:0.3 1/hr Mechanical ventilation summer with HR:no Preferred minimum indoor temperature for night ventilation:68 °F Overheating temperature:77 °F PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 15 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 15 ELECTRICITY DEMAND - AUXILIARY ELECTRICITY Type Quantity Indoor Norm demand Electric demand [kWh/yr] Source energy [kBtu/yr] Ventilation winter 1 no 0.7 W/cfm 26677.1 163830.9 Ventilation Defrost 1 no 45,929.8 W 14836.2 91112.6 Ventilation summer 1 no 0.7 W/cfm 17534.6 107684.3 DHW circulating pump 1 yes 134 W 1152.7 7078.8 DHW storage load pump 1 yes 833.4 W 7300.2 44832.3  67500.8 414538.9 0 7500 15000 22500 30000 Electric demand [kWh/yr] ELECTRICITY DEMAND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING Type Quantity Indoor Norm demand Electric demand [kWh/yr] Non-electric demand [kWh/yr] Source energy [kBtu/yr] Kitchen fridge/freeze combo 124 yes 1.2 54312 0 333543.5 Kitchen dishwasher 124 yes 1.2 12252.1 0 75243.5 Kitchen cooking 1 yes 0.2 36740 0 225629.5 Laundry - washer 1 yes 0.3 5692.7 0 34960 Laundry - dryer 1 yes 1 154881.6 0 951166.4 Energy consumed by evaporation 1 yes 3.1 0 3752.4 23044.4 User defined lighting 1 yes 103,000 103000 0 632548.6 User defined MELs 1 yes 123,700 123700 0 759672.5 PHIUS+ Exterior Lighting 1 no 1,696.5 1696.5 0 10418.6 255 492274.9 3752.4 3046227 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 Electric demand [kWh/yr] PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 16 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 16 INTERNAL HEAT GAINS Heating season Electricity total: Auxiliary electricity: People: Cold water: Evaporation:  Specific internal heat gains: 115,264.9 Btu/hr 4,983.5 Btu/hr 50,144.8 Btu/hr -5,444.4 Btu/hr -28,491.4 Btu/hr 136,457.3 Btu/hr 1.2 Btu/hr ft² -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] Cooling season Electricity total: Auxiliary electricity: People: Cold and hot water: Evaporation:  Specific internal heat gains: 115,264.9 Btu/hr 4,983.5 Btu/hr 50,144.8 Btu/hr 1,470.5 Btu/hr -28,491.4 Btu/hr 136,457.3 Btu/hr 1.2 Btu/hr ft² -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 17 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 17 DHW AND DISTRIBUTION DHW consumption per person per day:6.6 gal/Person/day Average cold water temperature supply:50.2 °F Useful heat DHW:608,107.5 kBtu/yr Specific useful heat DHW:5,288.4 Btu/ft²yr Total heat losses of the DHW system:20,333.3 kBtu/yr Specific losses of the DHW system:176.8 Btu/ft²yr Performance ratio DHW distribution system and storage:1 Utilization ratio DHW distribution system and storage:1 Total heat demand of DHW system:628,440.9 kBtu/yr Total specific heat demand of DHW system:5,465.2 Btu/ft²yr Total heat losses of the hydronic heating distribution:0 kBtu/yr Specific losses of the hydronic heating distribution:0 Btu/ft²yr Performance ratio of heat distribution:100 % Region Length [ft] Annual heat loss [kBtu/yr] Hydronic heating distribution pipes 0 0 DHW circulation pipes In conditioned space 1500 17201.9 1500 17201.9 Individual pipes In conditioned space 0 0 Water storage Device 5 (Water storage: DHW): 500 Gallon Tanks 764.6 Device 6 (Water storage: DHW): 119 gal storage 764.6 1529.2 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 1 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 1 BUILDING INFORMATION Category: Status: Building type: Year of construction: Units: Number of occupants: Occupant density: Residential In planning New construction 124 334 (Design) 344.3 ft²/Person Boundary conditions Climate: Internal heat gains: Interior temperature: Overheat temperature: BEVERLY MUNI MA 1.2 Btu/hr ft² 68 °F 77 °F Building geometry Enclosed volume: Net-volume: Total area envelope: Area/Volume Ratio: Floor area: Envelope area/iCFA: 1,476,473 ft³ 1,300,000 ft³ 124,356.5 ft² 0.1 1/ft 115,000 ft² 1.081 PASSIVEHOUSE REQUIREMENTS Certificate criteria:PHIUS+ 2018 Heating demand specific: target: total: 2.59 kBtu/ft²yr 5.7 kBtu/ft²yr 297,564.35 kBtu/yr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cooling demand sensible: latent: specific: target: total: 2.49 kBtu/ft²yr 0.36 kBtu/ft²yr 2.85 kBtu/ft²yr 6.9 kBtu/ft²yr 327,603.06 kBtu/yr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Heating load specific: target: total: 3.2 Btu/hr ft² 4.9 Btu/hr ft² 368,030.09 Btu/hr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cooling load specific: target: total: 2.54 Btu/hr ft² 2.8 Btu/hr ft² 292,062.3 Btu/hr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 2 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 2 Source energy total: specific: target: total: specific: 1,197,231.83 kWh/yr 3,585 kWh/Person yr 3,840 kWh/Person yr 4,084,721.35 kBtu/yr 35.52 kBtu/ft²yr 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Site energy total: specific: total: specific: 2,269,289.64 kBtu/yr 19.73 kBtu/ft²yr 665,128.79 kWh/yr 5.78 kWh/ft² 0 3.33 6.67 10 13.33 16.67 20 Air tightness ACH50: CFM50 per envelope area: target: target CFM50: 0.29 1/hr 0.05 cfm/ft² 0.34 1/hr 0.06 cfm/ft² 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 PASSIVEHOUSE RECOMMENDATIONS Sensible recovery efficiency:80.8 % 50 60 70 80 90 100 Frequency of overheating:31.1 % 0 5 10 15 20Cooling system is required Frequency of overheating only applies if there is not a [properly sized] cooling system installed. PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 3 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 3 BUILDING ELEMENTS Windows Average SHGC: Average solar reduction factor heating: Average solar reduction factor cooling: Average U-value: Total glazing area: Total window area: 0.31 0.53 0.49 0.169 Btu/hr ft² °F 12,026 ft² 14,934.1 ft² -150000 -100000 -50000 0 50000 100000 150000 SKYLIGHT WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH LOSS GAINHeat gain/loss heating period: [kBtu/yr] HVAC Total heating demand: Total cooling demand: Total DHW energy demand: Solar DHW contribution: Auxiliary electricity: 297,564 kBtu/yr 327,603 kBtu/yr 649,111 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 210,905 kBtu/yr 0 150000 300000 450000 600000 750000 [kBtu/yr]Electricity Direct heating / DHW: Heatpump heating: Cooling: HVAC auxiliary energy: Appliances: Renewable generation, coincident production and use: Total electricity demand: 19,025 kWh/yr 65,255 kWh/yr 26,757 kWh/yr 61,816 kWh/yr 492,275 kWh/yr 0 kWh/yr 665,129 kWh/yr 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 [kWh/yr] HEAT FLOW - HEATING PERIOD Heat gains Solar: Inner sources: Credit of thermal bridges: Mechanical heating: 355,515 kBtu/yr 659,791 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 297,564 kBtu/yr Solar 28 % Inner sources 52 % Credit of thermal bridges 0 % Mechanical heating 20 % Heat losses Opaque building envelope: Windows & Doors: Natural ventilation: Mechanical ventilation: 538,549 kBtu/yr 438,483 kBtu/yr 80,268 kBtu/yr 255,570 kBtu/yr Opaque building envelope 41 % Windows & Doors 33 % Natural ventilation 6 % Mechanical ventilation 19 % PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 4 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 4 CLIMATE Latitude: Longitude: Elevation of weather station: Elevation of building site: Heat capacity air: Daily temperature swing summer: Average wind speed: 42.6 ° -70.9 ° 111.5 ft 39 ft 0.018 Btu/ft³F 17.3 °F 13.1 ft/s Ground Average ground surface temperature: Amplitude ground surface temperature: Ground thermal conductivity: Ground heat capacity: Depth below grade of groundwater: Flow rate groundwater: 50.2 °F 59.2 °F 1.2 Btu/hr ft °F 29.8 Btu/ft³F 9.8 ft 0.2 ft/d 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-20 0 20 40 60 80 MonthTemperature [°F]Ambient Dew point Sky Ground 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120 15 30 45 60 MonthRadiation [kBtu/ft²Month]North East South West Global Calculation parameters Length of heating period 243 days/yr Heating degree hours 162.7 kFh/a Phase shift months 1.2 mths Time constant heating demand 164.9 hr Time constant cooling demand 0 hr Time constant cooling demand with night ventilation 0 hr Climate for Heating load 1 Heating load 2 Cooling Temperature [°F]5.5 15.4 80.1 Solar radiation North [Btu/hr ft²]12.7 10.1 20.3 Solar radiation East [Btu/hr ft²]25.4 15.2 46.6 Solar radiation South [Btu/hr ft²]71.3 33.3 51 Solar radiation West [Btu/hr ft²]29.5 16.5 52 Solar radiation Global [Btu/hr ft²]31.4 20 86.9 Relevant boundary conditions for heating load calculation: Heating load 1 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 5 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 5 ANNUAL HEAT DEMAND ANNUAL COOLING DEMAND Transmission losses : Ventilation losses: Total heat losses: 977,032 kBtu/yr 335,838 kBtu/yr 1,312,870 kBtu/yr Solar heat gains: Internal heat gains: Total heat gains: 428,769 kBtu/yr 795,741 kBtu/yr 1,224,510 kBtu/yr Utilization factor:82.9 % Useful heat gains:1,015,305 kBtu/yr Annual heat demand: Specific annual heat demand: 297,564 kBtu/yr 2,587.8 Btu/ft²yr Solar heat gains: Internal heat gains: Total heat gains: 646,071 kBtu/yr 1,255,818 kBtu/yr 1,901,889 kBtu/yr Transmission losses : Ventilation losses: Total heat losses: 1,470,403 kBtu/yr 2,025,657 kBtu/yr 3,496,060 kBtu/yr Utilization factor:46.2 % Useful heat losses:1,615,400 kBtu/yr Cooling demand - sensible: Cooling demand - latent: Annual cooling demand: Specific annual cooling demand: 286,488 kBtu/yr 41,115 kBtu/yr 327,603 kBtu/yr 2.8 kBtu/ft²yr 0 300000 600000 900000 1200000 1500000 WINTER ENERGY BALANCE kBtu/yr [kBtu/yr]WALLS ROOF WINDOWS VENTILAT. S. WIN. W. WIN. INTERNAL G. HEATING 0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 SUMMER ENERGY BALANCE kBtu/yr [kBtu/yr]WALLS WINDOWS VENTILAT. COOLING-sensi ble N. WIN. E. WIN. S. WIN. W. WIN. INTERNAL G. PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 6 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 6 SPECIFIC HEAT/COOLING DEMAND MONTHLY 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 [kBtu/ft²]JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberheating cooling Month Heating [kBtu/ft²] Cooling [kBtu/ft²] January 1.1 0 February 0.7 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0.1 June 0 0.3 July 0 0.8 August 0 1.4 September 0 0.3 October 0 0 November 0.1 0 December 0.6 0 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 7 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 7 HEATING LOAD COOLING LOAD First climate Second climate Transmission heat losses: Ventilation heat losses: Total heat loss: 348,257 Btu/hr 163,485.1 Btu/hr 511,742.1 Btu/hr 293,393.8 Btu/hr 137,473 Btu/hr 430,866.8 Btu/hr Solar heat gain: Internal heat gain: Total heat gains cooling: 109,664.4 Btu/hr 143,372.3 Btu/hr 253,036.7 Btu/hr Solar heat gain: Internal heat gain: Total heat gains heating: Heating load: 85,384.3 Btu/hr 58,327.7 Btu/hr 143,712 Btu/hr 368,030.1 Btu/hr 46,336.1 Btu/hr 58,327.7 Btu/hr 104,663.7 Btu/hr 326,203.1 Btu/hr Transmission heat losses: Ventilation heat losses: Total heat loss: -12,221.8 Btu/hr -26,803.8 Btu/hr -39,025.6 Btu/hr Cooling load - sensible: Cooling load - latent: 292,062.3 Btu/hr 0 Btu/hr Relevant heating load: Specific heating load: 368,030.1 Btu/hr 3.2 Btu/hr ft² Relevant cooling load: Specific maximum cooling load: 292,062.3 Btu/hr 2.5 Btu/hr ft² 0 150000 300000 450000 600000 WINTER ENERGY BALANCE Btu/hr [Btu/hr]WALLS ROOF WINDOWS VENTILAT. S. WIN. INTERNAL G. HEATING -60000 0 60000 120000 180000 240000 300000 SUMMER ENERGY BALANCE Btu/hr [Btu/hr]COOLING N. WIN. E. WIN. S. WIN. W. WIN. INTERNAL G. PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 8 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 8 AREAS Transmission heat losses - areas Name Area [ft²] Average U-value [Btu/hr ft² °F] Absorption coefficient Emission coefficient Reduction factor shading [%] Transmission losses heating [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses cooling [kBtu/yr] VC.1: SE (A143.1°, 7762.8 ft², width 32.906 ft)7762.8 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 39258.7 58746.2 VC.1: SE (A153.1°, 2809.17 ft², width 4 ft)2809.2 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 14206.8 21258.8 VC.1: NW (A332.9°, 134 ft², width 4 ft)134 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 677.7 1014.1 VC.1: NE (A63.1°, 6648.85 ft², width 9.12 ft)6648.8 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 33625.1 50316.2 VC.1: NW (A333.1°, 356 ft², width 4 ft)356 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 1800.4 2694.1 VC.1: SW (A243.1°, 5520.48 ft², width 33.3 ft)5520.5 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 27918.7 41777.1 VC.1: SW (A233.1°, 5399.5 ft², width 25.029 ft)5399.5 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 27306.9 40861.6 VC.1: NE (A53.1°, 4062.85 ft², width 33.166 ft)4062.9 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 20547 30746.3 VC.1: NW (A323.1°, 9276.22 ft², width 35 ft)9276.2 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 46912.5 70199.2 VC.1: NE (A60°, 281.1 ft², width 16.116 ft)281.1 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 1421.6 2127.2 VC.1: SE (A150°, 184.94 ft², width 18.494 ft)184.9 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 935.3 1399.6 VC.1: NW (A330°, 178.39 ft², width 17.839 ft)178.4 0.029 0.4 0.9 100 902.2 1350 VC.2: Horizontal (33404.08 ft², width 3.995 ft)33404.1 0.018 0.4 0.9 100 104034.5 155675.7 VC.4: Horizontal (28632.53 ft², width 3.995 ft)28632.5 0.039 0.4 0.9 100 192253.1 287684.8 VC.5: Horizontal (2627.43 ft², width 127.72 ft)2627.4 0.076 0 0 0 14754.8 30465.4 VC.6: Horizontal (2144.11 ft², width 37.1 ft)2144.1 0.032 0 0 0 11993.4 17946.8 Degree hours [kFh/a] Heating Cooling Ambient heating 96.5 144.4 Ground heating 41 84.6 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 Transmission heat losses - areas [kBtu/yr] VC.1: SE (A143.1°, 7762.8 ft², width 32.906 ft) VC.1: SE (A153.1°, 2809.17 ft², width 4 ft) VC.1: NW (A332.9°, 134 ft², width 4 ft) VC.1: NE (A63.1°, 6648.85 ft², width 9.12 ft) VC.1: NW (A333.1°, 356 ft², width 4 ft) VC.1: SW (A243.1°, 5520.48 ft², width 33.3 ft) VC.1: SW (A233.1°, 5399.5 ft², width 25.029 ft) VC.1: NE (A53.1°, 4062.85 ft², width 33.166 ft) VC.1: NW (A323.1°, 9276.22 ft², width 35 ft) VC.1: NE (A60°, 281.1 ft², width 16.116 ft) VC.1: SE (A150°, 184.94 ft², width 18.494 ft) VC.1: NW (A330°, 178.39 ft², width 17.839 ft) VC.2: Horizontal (33404.08 ft², width 3.995 ft) VC.4: Horizontal (28632.53 ft², width 3.995 ft) VC.5: Horizontal (2627.43 ft², width 127.72 ft) VC.6: Horizontal (2144.11 ft², width 37.1 ft) Heating period Cooling period THERMAL BRIDGES Transmission heat losses - thermal bridges Name Length [ft] Psi-value [Btu/hr ft °F] Transmission losses [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses cooling [kBtu/yr] PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 9 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 9 WINDOWS Transmission heat losses - windows Name Quan- tity Incli- nation [°] U-value total [Btu/hr ft² °F] SHGC (perpen- dicular) Reduction factor shading [%] Reduction factor shading summer [%] Solar gain heating [kBtu/yr] Solar gain cooling [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses heating [kBtu/yr] Transmission losses cooling [kBtu/yr] VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 12.1 ft², width 2.419 ft)16 90 0.184 0.3 64.2 59.5 2,360.6 3,907.7 6,181.5 9,250 VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)92 90 0.181 0.3 74.7 64.7 19,064.4 29,706.2 38,673.5 57,870.5 VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft)3 90 0.159 0.3 76.4 65.5 2,206.8 3,412 3,317.4 4,964.1 VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)8 90 0.181 0.3 91.9 73.6 4,140.6 5,265.2 3,362.9 5,032.2 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 55.62 ft², width 7.416 ft)33 90 0.155 0.3 95.1 81.6 33,892.7 53,972.9 49,254 73,703 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft)100 90 0.181 0.3 85.2 72.3 18,529.7 29,326.9 41,649.6 62,323.9 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 66.13 ft², width 8.817 ft)4 90 0.153 0.3 97 83.1 5,015.5 8,026.6 7,011.3 10,491.6 VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 19.89 ft², width 2.652 ft)24 90 0.176 0.3 88.3 76.1 15,433.5 21,732.8 14,578.2 21,814.6 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 11.8 ft², width 2.36 ft)24 90 0.185 0.3 68 50.9 7,777.5 9,988.3 9,089.4 13,601.2 VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)48 90 0.181 0.3 85.8 73.9 19,545.3 27,507.9 20,177.5 30,193.3 VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)8 90 0.154 0.3 85.4 74 16,146.8 22,776.3 12,064.6 18,053.3 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 22.87 ft², width 3.049 ft)2 90 0.172 0.3 88.1 75 705.3 1,117.8 1,362.2 2,038.3 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft)48 90 0.18 0.3 89.7 74.8 23,608.9 31,839.4 20,590.8 30,811.8 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 23.68 ft², width 4.735 ft)8 90 0.167 0.3 67.5 58.4 4,638.3 6,997 5,487.4 8,211.2 VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)20 90 0.154 0.3 81.5 69.8 22,772.9 35,156.9 30,161.5 45,133.3 VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)40 90 0.181 0.3 74.7 65.6 7,454.6 12,901.4 16,814.6 25,161.1 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)40 90 0.181 0.3 83.5 70.3 15,012.6 22,309.3 16,814.6 25,161.1 VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)16 90 0.154 0.3 81.3 70.5 16,406.1 28,030.9 24,129.2 36,106.6 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)16 90 0.154 0.3 85.6 71.5 30,845.5 45,641.5 24,129.2 36,106.6 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 11.84 ft², width 2.368 ft)8 90 0.185 0.3 63.8 47.1 2,113.7 2,928.5 3,037.1 4,544.7 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft)16 90 0.154 0.3 82 70.2 34,400.8 46,986.8 24,129.2 36,106.6 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft)30 90 0.181 0.3 83.8 70.6 13,155.4 17,807.7 12,494.9 18,697.2 VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)8 90 0.181 0.3 84.7 72.4 1,484.7 2,363.9 3,362.9 5,032.2 VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft)8 90 0.181 0.3 62.2 47.4 2,763.4 3,576.3 3,362.9 5,032.2 VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft)36 90 0.18 0.3 90.5 72.8 18,872.7 24,054.3 15,443.1 23,108.8 VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft)3 90 0.159 0.3 92.8 75.9 4,381 6,411.4 3,317.4 4,964.1 VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 132.5 ft², width 11.172 ft)6 90 0.185 0.5 62.3 60.7 41,189 65,005.8 25,574.4 38,269.2 VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 88.68 ft², width 7.455 ft)1 90 0.189 0.5 55.5 50.7 4,129.9 6,306.2 2,911.4 4,356.5 PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 10 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 10 0 15000 30000 45000 60000 75000 Transmission heat losses - windows [kBtu/yr] VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 12.1 ft², width 2.419 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 55.62 ft², width 7.416 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 66.13 ft², width 8.817 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 19.89 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 11.8 ft², width 2.36 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 22.87 ft², width 3.049 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 23.68 ft², width 4.735 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 11.84 ft², width 2.368 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 132.5 ft², width 11.172 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 88.68 ft², width 7.455 ft) Heating period Cooling period PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 11 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 11 0 15000 30000 45000 60000 75000 Solar gain by windows [kBtu/yr] VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 12.1 ft², width 2.419 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 55.62 ft², width 7.416 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 66.13 ft², width 8.817 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 19.89 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 11.8 ft², width 2.36 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A233.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 22.87 ft², width 3.049 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 23.68 ft², width 4.735 ft) VC.3: NE (A63.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: NE (A53.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 11.84 ft², width 2.368 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 56.25 ft², width 7.5 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.26 ft², width 2.652 ft) VC.3: NW (A323.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A143.1°, 13.41 ft², width 2.682 ft) VC.3: SE (A153.1°, 13.74 ft², width 2.749 ft) VC.3: SW (A243.1°, 40.01 ft², width 5.335 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 132.5 ft², width 11.172 ft) VC.7: SE (A143.1°, 88.68 ft², width 7.455 ft) Heating period Cooling period PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 12 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 12 Summary building envelope Total area / length Average U-value / Psi value Transmission losses Exterior wall ambient: Exterior wall ground: Basement: Roof: Windows: Doors: Thermal bridge ambient: Thermal bridge perimeter: Thermal bridge floor slab: 71,246.8 ft² 0 ft² 2,627.4 ft² 33,404.1 ft² 14,934.1 ft² 0 ft² 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0.033 Btu/hr ft² °F 0 Btu/hr ft² °F 0.076 Btu/hr ft² °F 0.018 Btu/hr ft² °F 0.169 Btu/hr ft² °F 0 Btu/hr ft² °F 0 Btu/hr ft °F 0 Btu/hr ft °F 0 Btu/hr ft °F 407,765.9 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 14,754.8 kBtu/yr 104,034.5 kBtu/yr 438,482.9 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr 0 kBtu/yr Shading Heating Cooling Reduction factor North: Reduction factor East: Reduction factor South: Reduction factor West: Reduction factor Horizontal: 91.6 % 77.9 % 75.5 % 84.4 % 100 % 78.3 % 67.5 % 65.7 % 71.6 % 100 % PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 13 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 13 System DHW Heating Total Covered DHW demand [%] Estimated solar fraction [%] Final energy demand [kBtu/yr] Covered heating demand [%] Estimated solar fraction [%] Final energy demand [kBtu/yr] Performance ratio CO2 equivalent emissions [lb/yr] Source energy demand [kBtu/yr] Heat pump, CHP-120 for recirc losses 0 0 0 90 0 69,630.1 0 30,595,679.9 125,334.1 Heat pump, CHP-120 for recirc losses 0 0 0 10 0 7,736.7 0 3,399,520 13,926 Heat pump, CHP-120 for recirc losses 80 0 129,822.2 0 0 0 0.3 57,044,316.5 233,680 Heat pump, CHP-120 for recirc losses 10 0 15,448.8 0 0 0 0.2 6,788,273.7 27,807.9 DHW Electric heating, 13.5 kW backup heat 10 0 64,911.1 0 0 0 1 28,522,158.2 116,840 100 0 210,182.2 100 0 77,366.7 126,349,948.2 517,588 Heat pump 0 % Heat pump 0 % Heat pump 62 % Heat pump 7 % DHW Electric heating 31 % Heat pump 90 % Heat pump 10 %Heat pump 0 %Heat pump 0 % DHW Electric heating 0 % DHW - final energy Heating - final energy COOLING UNITS sensible latent Air cooling: Recirculation cooling: Additional dehumidification: Panel cooling: Sum: 0 kBtu/ft²yr 2.5 kBtu/ft²yr 0 kBtu/ft²yr 2.5 kBtu/ft²yr 0 kBtu/ft²yr 0 kBtu/ft²yr 0.3 kBtu/ft²yr 0.4 kBtu/ft²yr PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 14 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 14 VENTILATION Energy transportable by supply air Heating energy transportable: load: 1.36 W/ft² 0.94 W/ft²0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cooling energy transportable: load: 0.84 W/ft² 0.74 W/ft²0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Infiltration pressure test ACH50:0.29 1/hr Total extract air demand:7,210 cfm Supply air per person:18 cfm Occupancy:334 Average air flow rate:7,210 cfm Average air change rate:0.33 1/hr Effective ACH ambient:0.08 1/hr Effective ACH ground:0 1/hr Energetically effective air exchange:0.08 1/hr Infiltration air change rate:0.02 1/hr Infiltration air change rate (heating load):0.05 1/hr Type of ventilation system:Balanced PH ventilation Wind screening coefficient (e):0.07 Wind exposure factor:15 Wind shield factor:0.05 Ventilation heat losses:314,719.12 kBtu/yr Devices Name Sensible recovery efficiency [-] Electric efficiency [W/cfm] Heat recovery efficiency SHX [-] Effective recovery efficiency [-] Swegon Gold RX 0.8 0.03 0 0.8 Altogether 0.8 0.03 0 0.8 Ducts Name Length (total) [ft] Clear cross-section [ft²] U-value [Btu/hr ft² °F] Assigned ventilation units Supply / outdoor air duct 25 2.5 1.38 Swegon Gold RX Extract / Exhaust air duct 25 2.5 1.38 Swegon Gold RX 50 *length * quantity ** thermal conductivity / thickness SUMMER VENTILATION ACH night ventilation:0 1/hr ACH natural summer:0 1/hr Mechanical ventilation summer:0.3 1/hr Mechanical ventilation summer with HR:no Preferred minimum indoor temperature for night ventilation:68 °F Overheating temperature:77 °F PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 15 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 15 ELECTRICITY DEMAND - AUXILIARY ELECTRICITY Type Quantity Indoor Norm demand Electric demand [kWh/yr] Source energy [kBtu/yr] Ventilation winter 1 no 0.6 W/cfm 23247.2 142766.9 Ventilation Defrost 1 no 45,929.8 W 14836.2 91112.6 Ventilation summer 1 no 0.6 W/cfm 15280.1 93839.2 DHW circulating pump 1 yes 134 W 1152.7 7078.8 DHW storage load pump 1 yes 833.4 W 7300.2 44832.3  61816.4 379629.8 0 6000 12000 18000 24000 Electric demand [kWh/yr] ELECTRICITY DEMAND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING Type Quantity Indoor Norm demand Electric demand [kWh/yr] Non-electric demand [kWh/yr] Source energy [kBtu/yr] Kitchen fridge/freeze combo 124 yes 1.2 54312 0 333543.5 Kitchen dishwasher 124 yes 1.2 12252.1 0 75243.5 Kitchen cooking 1 yes 0.2 36740 0 225629.5 Laundry - washer 1 yes 0.3 5692.7 0 34960 Laundry - dryer 1 yes 1 154881.6 0 951166.4 Energy consumed by evaporation 1 yes 3.1 0 1900.7 11672.6 User defined lighting 1 yes 103,000 103000 0 632548.6 User defined MELs 1 yes 123,700 123700 0 759672.5 PHIUS+ Exterior Lighting 1 no 1,696.5 1696.5 0 10418.6 255 492274.9 1900.7 3034855.2 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 Electric demand [kWh/yr] PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 16 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 16 INTERNAL HEAT GAINS Heating season Electricity total: Auxiliary electricity: People: Cold water: Evaporation:  Specific internal heat gains: 115,264.9 Btu/hr 4,983.5 Btu/hr 50,144.8 Btu/hr -5,444.4 Btu/hr -28,491.4 Btu/hr 136,457.3 Btu/hr 1.2 Btu/hr ft² -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] Cooling season Electricity total: Auxiliary electricity: People: Cold and hot water: Evaporation:  Specific internal heat gains: 115,264.9 Btu/hr 4,983.5 Btu/hr 50,144.8 Btu/hr 1,470.5 Btu/hr -28,491.4 Btu/hr 136,457.3 Btu/hr 1.2 Btu/hr ft² -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] -30000 0 30000 60000 90000 120000 [Btu/hr] PHIUS+ 2018 VERIFICATION 17 WUFI®Passive V.3.2.0.1: Linnean Solutions/Johnson Ian Page 17 DHW AND DISTRIBUTION DHW consumption per person per day:6.6 gal/Person/day Average cold water temperature supply:50.2 °F Useful heat DHW:608,107.5 kBtu/yr Specific useful heat DHW:5,288.4 Btu/ft²yr Total heat losses of the DHW system:41,003.6 kBtu/yr Specific losses of the DHW system:356.6 Btu/ft²yr Performance ratio DHW distribution system and storage:1.1 Utilization ratio DHW distribution system and storage:0.9 Total heat demand of DHW system:649,111.1 kBtu/yr Total specific heat demand of DHW system:5,645 Btu/ft²yr Total heat losses of the hydronic heating distribution:0 kBtu/yr Specific losses of the hydronic heating distribution:0 Btu/ft²yr Performance ratio of heat distribution:100 % Region Length [ft] Annual heat loss [kBtu/yr] Hydronic heating distribution pipes 0 0 DHW circulation pipes In conditioned space 1500 34688.8 1500 34688.8 Individual pipes In conditioned space 0 0 Water storage Device 5 (Water storage: DHW): 500 Gallon Tanks 1541.9 Device 6 (Water storage: DHW): 119 gal storage 1541.9 3083.8 Appendix F Climate Resilience Design Standards RMAT Tool Output Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool Project Report Lee Fort Terrace Date Created: 8/10/2022 1:41:04 PM Created By: dwells Date Report Generated: 8/10/2022 2:08:04 PM Tool Version: Version 1.2 Project Contact Information: Courtney Koslow (unknown) Project Summary Link to Project Estimated Capital Cost: $10000000.00 End of Useful Life Year: 2073 Project within mapped Environmental Justice neighborhood: Yes Ecosystem Service Benefits Scores Project Score Moderate Exposure Scores Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Moderate Exposure Extreme Precipitation - Urban Flooding High Exposure Extreme Precipitation - Riverine Flooding Not Exposed Extreme Heat High Exposure Asset Preliminar y Climate Risk Rating Summar y Number of Assets: 1 Asset Risk Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Extreme Precipitation - Urban Flooding Extreme Precipitation - Riverine Flooding Extreme Heat Energy Efficient Building Moderate Risk High Risk Low Risk High Risk Climate Resilience Design Standards Summar y Target Planning Horizon Intermediate Planning Horizon Percentile Return Period Tier Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Energy Efficient Building 2070 2050 100-yr (1%) Extreme Precipitation Energy Efficient Building 2070 25-yr (4%)Tier 3 Extreme Heat Energy Efficient Building 2070 90th Tier 3 Scoring Rationale - Project Exposure Score The purpose of the Exposure Score output is to provide a preliminar y assessment of whether the overall project site and subsequent assets are exposed to impacts of natural hazard events and/or future impacts of climate change. For each climate parameter, the Tool will calculate one of the following exposure ratings: Not Exposed, Low Exposure, Moderate Exposure, or High Exposure. The rationale behind the exposure rating is provided below. ■  ■  ■  ■  ■  Page 1 of 11 Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge This project received a "Moderate Exposure" because of the following: Exposed to the 1% annual coastal flood event as early as 2030 Located within the 0.1% annual coastal flood event within the project's useful life Not located within the predicted mean high water shoreline by 2030 Extreme Precipitation - Urban Flooding This project received a "High Exposure" because of the following: Maximum annual daily rainfall exceeds 10 inches within the overall project's useful life Existing imper vious area of the project site is greater than 50% No historic flooding at project site No increase to imper vious area Extreme Precipitation - Riverine Flooding This project received a "Not Exposed" because of the following: No historic riverine flooding at project site The project is not within a mapped FEMA floodplain [outside of the Massachusetts Coast Flood Risk Model (MC-FRM)] Project is more than 500ft from a waterbody Project is not likely susceptible to riverine erosion Extreme Heat This project received a "High Exposure" because of the following: 30+ days increase in days over 90 deg. F within project's useful life Existing trees are being removed as part of the proposed project Existing imper vious area of the project site is greater than 50% Located within 100 ft of existing water body No increase to the impervious area of the project site Scoring Rationale - Asset Preliminar y Climate Risk Rating A Preliminar y Climate Risk Rating is determined for each infrastructure and building asset by considering the overall project Exposure Score and responses to Step 4 questions provided by the user in the Tool. Natural Resource assets do not receive a risk rating. The following factors are what influenced the risk ratings for each asset. Asset - Energy Efficient Building Primar y asset criticality factors influencing risk ratings for this asset: Asset may inaccessible/inoperable during natural hazard event, but must be accessible/operable within one day after natural hazard event Loss/inoperability of the asset would have impacts limited to local area and/or municipality The building/facility provides ser vices to populations that reside within Environmental Justice neighborhoods or climate vulnerable populations. Some alternative programs and/or ser vices are available to support the community Cost to replace is between $10 million and $30 million There are no hazardous materials in the asset Page 2 of 11 Project Climate Resilience Design Standards Output Climate Resilience Design Standards and Guidance are recommended for each asset and climate parameter. The Design Standards for each climate parameter include the following: recommended planning horizon (target and/or intermediate), recommended return period (Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge and Precipitation) or percentile (Heat), and a list of applicable design criteria that are likely to be affected by climate change. Some design criteria have numerical values associated with the recommended return period and planning horizon, while others have tiered methodologies with step-by-step instructions on how to estimate design values given the other recommended design standards. Asset: Energy Efficient Building Building/Facility Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Moderate Risk Target Planning Horizon: 2070 Intermediate Planning Horizon: 2050 Return Period: 100-yr (1%) LIMITATIONS: The recommended Climate Resilience Design Standards for the Sea Level Rise / Storm Surge Design Criteria are based on the user drawn polygon and relationships as defined in the Supporting Documents. The projected values provided through the Tool are based on the Massachusetts Coast Flood Risk Model (MC-FRM) outputs as of 9/13/2021, which included GIS-based data for three planning horizons (2030, 2050, 2070) and six return periods (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 5%). These values are projections based on assumptions as defined in the model and the LiDAR used at the time. For additional information on the MC-FRM, review the additional resources provided on the Start Here page. The projected values, Standards, and Guidance provided within this Tool may be used to inform plans and designs, but they do not provide guarantees for future conditions or resilience. The projected values are not to be considered final or appropriate for construction documents without supporting engineering analyses. The guidance provided within this Tool is intended to be general and users are encouraged to do their own due diligence. Applicable Design Criteria Projected Tidal Datums: APPLICABLE Note: The site is exposed to Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge, but projected Tidal Datums are not available within the site. Additional site- specific analyses are recommended to identify projected Tidal Datums for the recommended planning horizon. Consult a professional coastal engineer or modeler to estimate projected Tidal Datums based on the recommended Standards and additional outputs provided through this Tool. Projected Water Surface Elevation: APPLICABLE Asset Name Recommended Planning Horizon Recommended Return Period Max Min Area Weighted Average (ft - NAVD88) Energy Efficient Building 2050 1% (100-Year)11.8 11.7 11.7 2070 13.5 13.5 13.5 Projected Wave Action Water Elevation: APPLICABLE Asset Name Recommended Planning Horizon Recommended Return Period Max Min Area Weighted Average (ft - NAVD88) Energy Efficient Building 2050 1% (100-Year)13.2 12.1 12.7 2070 15.4 14.6 14.9 Projected Wave Heights: APPLICABLE Asset Name Recommended Planning Horizon Recommended Return Period Max Min Area Weighted Average (Feet) Energy Efficient Building 2050 1% (100-Year)2.0 0.5 1.4 2070 2.5 1.5 1.8 ATTENTION: This project intersects areas influenced by wave overtopping based flooding These areas are where flooding is caused by intermittent pulses that come from wave run-up and overtopping at a coastal structure. Additional site analyses are recommended to establish design values associated with design criteria. Projected Duration of Flooding: APPLICABLE Methodology to Estimate Projected Values Projected Design Flood Velocity: APPLICABLE Page 3 of 11 Methodology to Estimate Projected Values Projected Scour & Erosion: NOT APPLICABLE Extreme Precipitation High Risk Target Planning Horizon: 2070 Return Period: 25-yr (4%) LIMITATIONS: The recommended Standards for Total Precipitation Depth & Peak Intensity are determined by the user drawn polygon and relationships as defined in the Supporting Documents. The projected Total Precipitation Depth values provided through the Tool are based on the climate projections developed by Cornell University as part of EEA's Massachusetts Climate and Hydrologic Risk Project, GIS-based data as of 10/15/21. For additional information on the methodology of these precipitation outputs, see Supporting Documents. While Total Precipitation Depth & Peak Intensity for 24-hour Design Storms are useful to inform planning and design, it is recommended to also consider additional longer- and shorter-duration precipitation events and intensities in accordance with best practices. Longer-duration, lower-intensity storms allow time for infiltration and reduce the load on infrastructure over the duration of the storm. Shorter-duration, higher-intensity storms often have higher runoff volumes because the water does not have enough time to infiltrate infrastructure systems (e.g., catch basins) and may overflow or back up during such storms, resulting in flooding. In the Northeast, short-duration high intensity rain events are becoming more frequent, and there is often little early warning for these events, making it difficult to plan operationally. While the Tool does not provide recommended design standards for these scenarios, users should still consider both short- and long-duration precipitation events and how they may impact the asset. The projected values, standards, and guidance provided within this Tool may be used to inform plans and designs, but they do not provide guarantees for future conditions or resilience. The projected values are not to be considered final or appropriate for construction documents without supporting engineering analyses. The guidance provided within this Tool is intended to be general and users are encouraged to do their own due diligence Applicable Design Criteria Tiered Methodology: Tier 3 Projected Total Precipitation Depth & Peak Intensity for 24-hr Design Storms: APPLICABLE Asset Name Recommended Planning Horizon Recommended Return Period (Design Storm) Projected 24-hr Total Precipitation Depth (inches) Step-by-Step Methodology for Peak Intensity Energy Efficient Building 2070 25-Year (4%)8.3 Downloadable Methodology PDF Projected Riverine Peak Discharge & Peak Flood Elevation: NOT APPLICABLE Extreme Heat High Risk Target Planning Horizon: 2070 Percentile: 90th Percentile Applicable Design Criteria Tiered Methodology: Tier 3 Projected Annual/Summer/Winter Average Temperatures: APPLICABLE Methodology to Estimate Projected Values : Tier 3 Projected Heat Index: APPLICABLE Methodology to Estimate Projected Values : Tier 3 Projected Growing Degree Days: NOT APPLICABLE Projected Days Per Year With Max Temp > 95°F, >90°F, <32°F: APPLICABLE Methodology to Estimate Projected Values : Tier 3 Projected Number of Heat Waves Per Year & Average Heat Wave Duration: APPLICABLE Methodology to Estimate Projected Values : Tier 3 Projected Cooling Degree Days & Heating Degree Days (base = 65°F): APPLICABLE Methodology to Estimate Projected Values : Tier 3 Page 4 of 11 Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Project Maps The following three maps illustrate the Projected Water Surface Elevation for the 2030, 2050, and 2070 planning horizons corresponding to the lowest return period (largest design storm) recommended across the assets identified for this project in the Tool. For projects that only have Natural Resource assets, the maps will show the Projected Water Surface Elevations corresponding to the 5% (20-year) return period. Refer to the Climate Resilience Design Standards Output - Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Section for additional values associated with other assets. The maps include the project area as drawn by the user with a 0.1 mile minimum buffer, but do not reflect the location of specific assets on the site. LIMITATIONS: The recommended Climate Resilience Design Standards for the Sea Level Rise / Storm Surge Design Criteria are based on the user drawn polygon and relationships as defined in the Supporting Documents. The projected values and maps provided through the Tool are based on the Massachusetts Coast Flood Risk Model (MC-FRM) outputs as of 9/13/2021, which included GIS-based data for three planning horizons (2030, 2050, 2070) and six return periods (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 5%). These values are projections based on assumptions as defined in the model and the LiDAR used at the time. For additional information on the MC-FRM, review the additional resources provided on the Start Here page. The projected values, maps, Standards, and Guidance provided within this Tool may be used to inform plans and designs, but they do not provide guarantees for future conditions or resilience. The projected values are not to be considered final or appropriate for construction documents without supporting engineering analyses. The guidance provided within this Tool is intended to be general and users are encouraged to do their own due diligence. Page 5 of 11 Legend Project Boundary Influenced by waveovertoppingProjected Water SurfaceElevation (ft-NAVD88) ≤ 10.1 10.1 - 10.3 10.3 - 10.5 10.5 - 10.7 10.7 - 10.9 10.9 - 11.1 11.1 - 11.3 11.3 - 11.5 11.5 - 11.7 11.7 - 11.9 11.9 - 12.1 12.1 - 12.3 12.3 - 12.5 12.5 - 12.7 12.7 - 12.9 12.9 - 13.1 13.1 - 13.3 13.3 - 13.5 ≥ 13.5203020502070Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool: Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge Design Criteria Projected Water Surface Elevation Map: 1% (100-yr)Project Name: Lee Fort TerraceLocation (Town): Salem MilesAsset NamePlanning HorizonReturn PeriodMaxMinArea Weighted Average(ft-NAVD88)Energy Efficient Building20301% (100-yr)10.710.110.220501% (100-yr)11.811.711.720701% (100-yr)13.513.513.5ATTENTION: This project intersects areas influenced by wave overtopping based flooding These areas are where flooding is causedby intermittent pulses that come from wave run-up and overtopping at a coastal structure. Additional site analyses arerecommended to establish design values associated with design criteria.0.250.51.0Created by: dwellsDate Created: 8/10/2022Tool Version: 1.2Page 6 of 11 Legend Project Boundary Influenced by wave overtopping Projected Water Surface Elevation (ft-NAVD88) ≤ 10.1 10.1 - 10.3 10.3 - 10.5 10.5 - 10.7 10.7 - 10.9 10.9 - 11.1 11.1 - 11.3 11.3 - 11.5 11.5 - 11.7 11.7 - 11.9 11.9 - 12.1 12.1 - 12.3 12.3 - 12.5 12.5 - 12.7 12.7 - 12.9 12.9 - 13.1 13.1 - 13.3 13.3 - 13.5 ≥ 13.5 Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool: Sea Level Rise/Storm Sur ve Design Criteria Projected Water Surface Elevation Map: 2030, 1% (100-yr) Project Name: Lee Fort Terrace Location (Town): Salem Miles Asset Name Planning Horizon Return Period Max Min Area Weighted Average (ft-NAVD88) Energy Efficient Building 2030 1% (100-yr)10.7 10.1 10.2 ATTENTION: This project intersects areas influenced by wave overtopping based flooding These areas are where flooding is caused by intermittent pulses that come from wave run-up and overtopping at a coastal structure. Additional site analyses are recommended to establish design values associated with design criteria. 0.05 0.1 0.25 Created by: dwells Date Created: 8/10/2022 Tool Version: 1.2 Page 7 of 11 Legend Project Boundary Influenced by wave overtopping Projected Water Surface Elevation (ft-NAVD88) ≤ 10.1 10.1 - 10.3 10.3 - 10.5 10.5 - 10.7 10.7 - 10.9 10.9 - 11.1 11.1 - 11.3 11.3 - 11.5 11.5 - 11.7 11.7 - 11.9 11.9 - 12.1 12.1 - 12.3 12.3 - 12.5 12.5 - 12.7 12.7 - 12.9 12.9 - 13.1 13.1 - 13.3 13.3 - 13.5 ≥ 13.5 Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool: Sea Level Rise/Storm Sur ve Design Criteria Projected Water Surface Elevation Map: 2050, 1% (100-yr) Project Name: Lee Fort Terrace Location (Town): Salem Miles Asset Name Planning Horizon Return Period Max Min Area Weighted Average (ft-NAVD88) Energy Efficient Building 2050 1% (100-yr)11.8 11.7 11.7 ATTENTION: This project intersects areas influenced by wave overtopping based flooding These areas are where flooding is caused by intermittent pulses that come from wave run-up and overtopping at a coastal structure. Additional site analyses are recommended to establish design values associated with design criteria. 0.05 0.1 0.25 Created by: dwells Date Created: 8/10/2022 Tool Version: 1.2 Page 8 of 11 Legend Project Boundary Influenced by wave overtopping Projected Water Surface Elevation (ft-NAVD88) ≤ 10.1 10.1 - 10.3 10.3 - 10.5 10.5 - 10.7 10.7 - 10.9 10.9 - 11.1 11.1 - 11.3 11.3 - 11.5 11.5 - 11.7 11.7 - 11.9 11.9 - 12.1 12.1 - 12.3 12.3 - 12.5 12.5 - 12.7 12.7 - 12.9 12.9 - 13.1 13.1 - 13.3 13.3 - 13.5 ≥ 13.5 Climate Resilience Design Standards Tool: Sea Level Rise/Storm Sur ve Design Criteria Projected Water Surface Elevation Map: 2070, 1% (100-yr) Project Name: Lee Fort Terrace Location (Town): Salem Miles Asset Name Planning Horizon Return Period Max Min Area Weighted Average (ft-NAVD88) Energy Efficient Building 2070 1% (100-yr)13.5 13.5 13.5 ATTENTION: This project intersects areas influenced by wave overtopping based flooding These areas are where flooding is caused by intermittent pulses that come from wave run-up and overtopping at a coastal structure. Additional site analyses are recommended to establish design values associated with design criteria. 0.05 0.1 0.25 Created by: dwells Date Created: 8/10/2022 Tool Version: 1.2 Page 9 of 11 Project Inputs Core Project Information Name:Lee Fort Terrace Given the expected useful life of the project, through what year do you estimate the project to last (i.e. before a major reconstruction/renovation)? 2073 Location of Project:Salem Estimated Capital Cost:$10,000,000 Who is the Submitting Entity?Private Other BC Leefort Terrace LLC Courtney Koslow (unknown) Is this project being submitted as part of a state grant application?No Which grant program? What stage are you in your project lifecycle?Permitting Is climate resiliency a core objective of this project?No Is this project being submitted as part of the state capital planning process?No Is this project being submitted as part of a regulator y review process or permitting?Yes Brief Project Description:MEPA Order of Conditions Ch. 91 License Project Submission Comments: Project Ecosystem Service Benefits Factors Influencing Output ✓ Project reduces storm damage ✓ Project protects public water supply ✓ Project promotes decarbonization ✓ Project recharges groundwater ✓ Project filters stormwater using green infrastructure ✓ Project improves water quality ✓ Project protects fisheries, wildlife, and plant habitat ✓ Project improves air quality ✓ Project prevents pollution Factors to Improve Output ✓ Incorporate nature-based solutions that may provide flood protection ✓ Incorporate nature-based solutions that sequester carbon carbon ✓ Preser ve, enhance, and/or restore coastal shellfish habitats ✓ Incorporate vegetation that provides pollinator habitat ✓ Identify opportunities to remediate existing sources of pollution ✓ Provide opportunities for passive and/or active recreation through open space ✓ Increase plants, trees, and/or other vegetation to provide oxygen production ✓ Incorporate education and/or protect cultural resources as part of your project Is the primar y purpose of this project ecological restoration? No Project Benefits Provides flood protection through nature-based solutions No Reduces storm damage Yes Recharges groundwater Yes Protects public water supply Yes Filters stormwater using green infrastructure Yes Improves water quality Yes Promotes decarbonization Yes Enables carbon sequestration No Provides oxygen production No Improves air quality Yes Prevents pollution Yes Remediates existing sources of pollution No Protects fisheries, wildlife, and plant habitat Yes Protects land containing shellfish No Provides pollinator habitat No Provides recreation No Provides cultural resources/education No Project Climate Exposure Is the primar y purpose of this project ecological restoration?No Does the project site have a history of coastal flooding?Unsure Does the project site have a history of flooding during extreme precipitation events (unrelated to water/sewer damages)? Unsure Page 10 of 11 Does the project site have a history of riverine flooding?No Does the project result in a net increase in impervious area of the site?No Are existing trees being removed as part of the proposed project?Yes Project Assets Asset: Energy Efficient Building Asset Type: Typically Occupied Asset Sub-Type: Residential building - Public Housing Construction Type: New Construction Construction Year: 2023 Useful Life: 50 Identify the length of time the asset can be inaccessible/inoperable without significant consequences. Building may be inaccessible/inoperable during natural hazard event, but must be accessible/operable within one day after natural hazard event Identify the geographic area directly affected by permanent loss or significant inoperability of the building/facility. Impacts would be limited to local area and/or municipality Identify the population directly served that would be affected by the permanent loss of use or inoperability of the building/facility. Less than 1,000 people Identify if the building/facility provides ser vices to populations that reside within Environmental Justice neighborhoods or climate vulnerable populations. The building/facility provides services to populations that reside within Environmental Justice neighborhoods or climate vulnerable populations. If the building/facility became inoperable for longer than acceptable in Question 1, how, if at all, would it be expected to impact people’s health and safety? Inoperability of the building/facility would not be expected to result in injuries If there are hazardous materials in your building/facility, what are the extent of impacts related to spills/releases of these materials? There are no hazardous materials in the building/facility If the building/facility became inoperable for longer than acceptable in Question 1, what are the impacts on other facilities, assets, and/or infrastructure? Minor – Inoperability will not likely affect other facilities, assets, or buildings If this building/facility was damaged beyond repair, how much would it approximately cost to replace? Between $10 million and $30 million Is this a recreational facility which can be vacated during a natural hazard event? No If the building/facility became inoperable for longer than acceptable in Question 1, what are the public and/or social services impacts? Some alternative programs and/or services are available to support the community If the building/facility became inoperable for longer than acceptable in Question 1, what are the environmental impacts related to natural resources? No impact on surrounding natural resources is expected If the building/facility became inoperable for longer than acceptable in Question 1, what are the impacts to government services (i.e. the building is not able to serve or operate its intended users or function)? Loss of building is not expected to reduce the ability to maintain government ser vices. If the building/facility became inoperable for longer than acceptable in Question 1, what are the impacts to loss of confidence in government (i.e. the building is not able to serve or operate its intended users or function)? No Impact Repor t Comments N/A Page 11 of 11 Appendix G Existing Flood by Elevation Band Existing Flood Surge Existing Flood Recession prepared by Bohler Proposed Flood by Elevation Band Proposed Flood Surge Proposed Flood Recession prepared by Bohler Z CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)ORG. DATE -REVISIONSREVDATECOMMENTDRAWN BYCHECKED BY12/02/2020DISCLAIMER This drawing and/or file has been prepared by Bohler at the request of the Project Owner or his Representative and is being provided solely as a convenience to the recipient. Bohler makes no representation regarding the suitability for the intended use by the recipient. Further, Bohler makes noPROJECT No.:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:CAD I.D.:PROJECT:FORP:\20\M201067\DRAWINGS\PLAN SETS\M201067_SS0----->LAYOUT: C-201-EXSTWG THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR AGENCYREVIEW AND APPROVAL. IT IS NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENT UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.SHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:M201067WNGMMW12/02/2020M201067_SS0PROPOSED SITEPLAN DOCUMENTSBeaconCommunitiesLLCPROPOSEDDEVELOPMENTLee Fort TerraceSalem, MAFOR CONCEPTPURPOSES ONLYALWAYS CALL 811It's fast. It's free. It's the law.TM THE INFORMATION, DESIGN AND CONTENT OF THIS PLAN ARE PROPRIETARY AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM BOHLER. ONLY APPROVED, SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES © SITE CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PERMITTING SERVICES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES BOHLER45 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comWES1"=40'040102040C-201EXISTINGCONDITIONSPLANLAND ABOVE 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONLAND BELOW 8.0ELEVATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYLAND BETWEEN 8.0-9.0ELEVATIONLAND BETWEEN 9.0-10.0ELEVATIONEXISTINGFLOOD BYELEVATIONBAND Z CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)ORG. DATE -REVISIONSREVDATECOMMENTDRAWN BYCHECKED BY12/02/2020DISCLAIMER This drawing and/or file has been prepared by Bohler at the request of the Project Owner or his Representative and is being provided solely as a convenience to the recipient. Bohler makes no representation regarding the suitability for the intended use by the recipient. Further, Bohler makes noPROJECT No.:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:CAD I.D.:PROJECT:FORP:\20\M201067\DRAWINGS\PLAN SETS\M201067_SS0----->LAYOUT: C-201-EXSTWG THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR AGENCYREVIEW AND APPROVAL. IT IS NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENT UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.SHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:M201067WNGMMW12/02/2020M201067_SS0PROPOSED SITEPLAN DOCUMENTSBeaconCommunitiesLLCPROPOSEDDEVELOPMENTLee Fort TerraceSalem, MAFOR CONCEPTPURPOSES ONLYALWAYS CALL 811It's fast. It's free. It's the law.TM THE INFORMATION, DESIGN AND CONTENT OF THIS PLAN ARE PROPRIETARY AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM BOHLER. ONLY APPROVED, SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES © SITE CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PERMITTING SERVICES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES BOHLER45 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comWES1"=40'040102040C-201EXISTINGCONDITIONSPLANFLOOD SURGELAND ABOVE 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONLAND BELOW 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTINGFLOOD SURGE Z CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)CHAPTER 91 LANDLOCKED TIDELANDSLIMIT (250' OFFSET FROM MHW)ORG. DATE -REVISIONSREVDATECOMMENTDRAWN BYCHECKED BY12/02/2020DISCLAIMER This drawing and/or file has been prepared by Bohler at the request of the Project Owner or his Representative and is being provided solely as a convenience to the recipient. Bohler makes no representation regarding the suitability for the intended use by the recipient. Further, Bohler makes noPROJECT No.:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:CAD I.D.:PROJECT:FORP:\20\M201067\DRAWINGS\PLAN SETS\M201067_SS0----->LAYOUT: C-201-EXSTWG THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR AGENCYREVIEW AND APPROVAL. IT IS NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENT UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.SHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:M201067WNGMMW12/02/2020M201067_SS0PROPOSED SITEPLAN DOCUMENTSBeaconCommunitiesLLCPROPOSEDDEVELOPMENTLee Fort TerraceSalem, MAFOR CONCEPTPURPOSES ONLYALWAYS CALL 811It's fast. It's free. It's the law.TM THE INFORMATION, DESIGN AND CONTENT OF THIS PLAN ARE PROPRIETARY AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM BOHLER. ONLY APPROVED, SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES © SITE CIVIL AND CONSULTING ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PERMITTING SERVICES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES BOHLER45 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comWES1"=40'040102040C-201EXISTINGCONDITIONSPLANLAND ABOVE 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONLAND BELOW 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYFLOOD RECESSIONEXISTINGFLOODRECESSION Z TWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSS S EE E E E E E ESSSSSSSS 101191 29 911 11 11109DDDD1010 10109 6 8 7 7 8 10 11 12 15 14 13 12 11 16 8 1 1 1213D9101113 12 11 18 17 16 15 19 14 9101111 10 9 9101110101 0987 9988 8D1213141110 9 8 7 12111010 PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2A)BOTTOM = 7.0PROP. CB-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.6PROP. CB-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.3PROP. DMH-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.2PROP. DMH-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.0PROP. BIO-RETENTIONCELL (BIO-1) (LINED)INV = 2.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE -1RIM=10.0INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 6.5INV OUT = 6.58 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. AD-1RIM = 9.4INV = 7.032 LF OF 6"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. CB-3RIM = 9.5INV = 6.218 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%100 LF OF 12"PERFORATEDUNDERDRAIN,S=0.5%PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.0PROP. RDINV. = 6.526 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=1.0%160 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%WQU-1RIM = 10.4INV = 5.6DMH-3RIM = 10.6INV = 5.4DMH-4RIM = 10.6INV = 4.042 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%114 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%270 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-2RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 3.1PROP. CLEANOUTPROP. CLEANOUTINV.=3.9PROP. DMH-5RIM = 10.0INV (DMH-4) = 3.2INV (RD) = 3.6PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.010.59.0±(M.E.)10.510.510.5TC=10.3±(M.E.)BC=9.9±(M.E.)TC=10.1)BC=9.6±(M.E.)TC=9.6±(M.E.)BC=9.3±(M.E.)TC=10.3BC=9.89.5±(M.E.)TC=10.5BC=10.014.5TC=7.8±(M.E.)BC=7.5±(M.E.)TC=7.7±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.5±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.6±(M.E.)BC=7.3±(M.E.)TC=8.0BC=7.5±(M.E.)7.97.77.913.013.012.57.88.17.8PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2B)BOTTOM = 6.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-3RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 4.0122 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=2.4%21 LF OF 6" HDPE,S=1.0%85 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. RDINV. = 6.57.87.978 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%65 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=2.0%148 L F O F 1 2 " H D P E , S = 1 . 7 % 14 13 108.58.813.2 '20.0 '25.1'5.0'PROP. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 33,250 SF ±THIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR SITEGRADING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGENERAL NOTES SHEETFOR ADDITIONAL GRADING & UTILITYNOTESWES1"=30'0307.51530C-401GRADING &DRAINAGE PLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETLAND BETWEEN 8.0-9.0ELEVATIONLAND BETWEEN 9.0-10.0ELEVATIONLAND ABOVE 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONLAND BELOW 8.0ELEVATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED FLOOD BYELEVATION BAND Z TWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSS S EE E E E E E ESSSSSSSS 101191 29 911 11 11109DDDD1010 10109 6 8 7 7 8 10 11 12 15 14 13 12 11 16 8 1 1 1213D9101113 12 11 18 17 16 15 19 14 9101111 10 9 9101110101 0987 9988 8D1213141110 9 8 7 12111010 PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2A)BOTTOM = 7.0PROP. CB-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.6PROP. CB-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.3PROP. DMH-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.2PROP. DMH-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.0PROP. BIO-RETENTIONCELL (BIO-1) (LINED)INV = 2.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE -1RIM=10.0INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 6.5INV OUT = 6.58 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. AD-1RIM = 9.4INV = 7.032 LF OF 6"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. CB-3RIM = 9.5INV = 6.218 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%100 LF OF 12"PERFORATEDUNDERDRAIN,S=0.5%PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.0PROP. RDINV. = 6.526 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=1.0%160 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%WQU-1RIM = 10.4INV = 5.6DMH-3RIM = 10.6INV = 5.4DMH-4RIM = 10.6INV = 4.042 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%114 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%270 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-2RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 3.1PROP. CLEANOUTPROP. CLEANOUTINV.=3.9PROP. DMH-5RIM = 10.0INV (DMH-4) = 3.2INV (RD) = 3.6PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.010.59.0±(M.E.)10.510.510.5TC=10.3±(M.E.)BC=9.9±(M.E.)TC=10.1)BC=9.6±(M.E.)TC=9.6±(M.E.)BC=9.3±(M.E.)TC=10.3BC=9.89.5±(M.E.)TC=10.5BC=10.014.5TC=7.8±(M.E.)BC=7.5±(M.E.)TC=7.7±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.5±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.6±(M.E.)BC=7.3±(M.E.)TC=8.0BC=7.5±(M.E.)7.97.77.913.013.012.57.88.17.8PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2B)BOTTOM = 6.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-3RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 4.0122 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=2.4%21 LF OF 6" HDPE,S=1.0%85 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. RDINV. = 6.57.87.978 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%65 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=2.0%148 L F O F 1 2 " H D P E , S = 1 . 7 % 14 13 1013.2 '20.0 '25.1'5.0'PROP. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 33,250 SF ±THIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR SITEGRADING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGENERAL NOTES SHEETFOR ADDITIONAL GRADING & UTILITYNOTESWES1"=30'0307.51530C-401GRADING &DRAINAGE PLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETLAND ABOVE 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONLAND BELOW 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED FLOOD SURGEFLOOD SURGE Z TWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSS S EE E E E E E ESSSSSSSS 101191 29 911 11 11109DDDD1010 10109 6 8 7 7 8 10 11 12 15 14 13 12 11 16 8 1 1 1213D9101113 12 11 18 17 16 15 19 14 9101111 10 9 9101110101 0987 9988 8D1213141110 9 8 7 12111010 PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2A)BOTTOM = 7.0PROP. CB-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.6PROP. CB-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.3PROP. DMH-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.2PROP. DMH-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.0PROP. BIO-RETENTIONCELL (BIO-1) (LINED)INV = 2.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE -1RIM=10.0INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 6.5INV OUT = 6.58 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. AD-1RIM = 9.4INV = 7.032 LF OF 6"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. CB-3RIM = 9.5INV = 6.218 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%100 LF OF 12"PERFORATEDUNDERDRAIN,S=0.5%PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.0PROP. RDINV. = 6.526 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=1.0%160 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%WQU-1RIM = 10.4INV = 5.6DMH-3RIM = 10.6INV = 5.4DMH-4RIM = 10.6INV = 4.042 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%114 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%270 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-2RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 3.1PROP. CLEANOUTPROP. CLEANOUTINV.=3.9PROP. DMH-5RIM = 10.0INV (DMH-4) = 3.2INV (RD) = 3.6PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.010.59.0±(M.E.)10.510.510.5TC=10.3±(M.E.)BC=9.9±(M.E.)TC=10.1)BC=9.6±(M.E.)TC=9.6±(M.E.)BC=9.3±(M.E.)TC=10.3BC=9.89.5±(M.E.)TC=10.5BC=10.014.5TC=7.8±(M.E.)BC=7.5±(M.E.)TC=7.7±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.5±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.6±(M.E.)BC=7.3±(M.E.)TC=8.0BC=7.5±(M.E.)7.97.77.913.013.012.57.88.17.8PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2B)BOTTOM = 6.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-3RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 4.0122 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=2.4%21 LF OF 6" HDPE,S=1.0%85 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. RDINV. = 6.57.87.978 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%65 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=2.0%148 L F O F 1 2 " H D P E , S = 1 . 7 % 14 13 1013.2 '20.0 '25.1'5.0'PROP. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 33,250 SF ±THIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR SITEGRADING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGENERAL NOTES SHEETFOR ADDITIONAL GRADING & UTILITYNOTESWES1"=30'0307.51530C-401GRADING &DRAINAGE PLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETLAND ABOVE 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONLAND BELOW 10.0FLOOD ELEVATIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYFLOOD RECESSIONPROPOSED FLOOD RECESSION Appendix H Figure 1: EJ Populations within 5 Miles Figure 2: EJ Populations within 1 Mile Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Advance Notice &Environmental Screening Form Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants,Inc. Department of Public Health Salem -EJ Report Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. EPA EJ Screen Report Prepared by LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. ± 1 inch = 8,000 feet 0 4,000 8,0002,000 Feet Date: 8/11/2022 EJ Criteria Minority Incom e Engllish isolation Minority and Incom e Minority and English isolation Incom e and English isolation Minority, Incom e and English isolation MassGIS Data Source:"Bureau of Geographic Information (MassGIS), Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Technology and Security Services". MassGIS Data: 2020 Environmental Justice Populations (June 2021) _____________________________ LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Wakefield, MA 781.245.2500 www.lecenvironmental.com Figure 1EJ Populations within 5 Miles 1 & 2 Lee Fort Te rrace Salem, MA Project Boundary 5-mile B uffer 1-mile B uffer BG 1, CT 2045 BG 4, CT 2044 BG 4, CT 2046 BG 4, CT 2174 BG 3, CT 2043BG 1, CT 2042 BG 2, CT 2043 BG 2, CT 2042 BG 5, CT 2042 BG 1, CT 2046 BG 4, CT 2042 ± 1 inch = 2,000 feet 0 1,000 2,000500 Feet Date: 8/11/2022 Pro je ct Bo und ary 1-mile BufferEJ Criteria Minority Incom e Engllish isolation Minority and Incom e Minority and English isolation Incom e and English isolation Minority, Incom e and English isolation MassGIS Data Source: "Bureau of Geographic Information (MassGIS), Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Technology and Security Services". MassGIS Data: 2020 Environmental Justice Populations (June 2021) _____________________________ LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Wakefield, MA 781.245.2500 www.lecenvironmental.com Figure 2EJ Populations within 1 Mile 1 & 2 Lee Fort Te rrace Salem, MA 1 Ann Marton From:Sharon SullivanSent:Tuesday, June 28, 2022 5:27 PMTo:danielledolan@massriversalliance.org; uliablatt@massriversalliance.org;Andrea@n2nma.org; elvis@n2nma.org; ben@environmentmassachusetts.org;claire@uumassaction.org; cluppi@cleanwater.org; deb.pasternak@sierraclub.org;hclish@outdoors.org; hricci@massaudubon.org; kelly.boling@tpl.org;kerry@msaadapartners.com; lorel@thetrustees.org;ngoodman@environmentalleague.org; pstanton@e4thefuture.org; rob@oceanriver.org;robb@massland.org; sarah@massclimateaction.net; srubin@clf.org;sylvia@communityactionworks.org; wvaughan@hcwh.org;tribalcouncil@chappaquiddick-wampanoag.org; crwritings@aol.com;john.peters@mass.gov; acw1213@verizon.net; melissa@herringpondtribe.org;rockerpatriciad@verizon.net; rhalsey@naicob.org; Coradot@yahooe.com;Solomon.Elizabeth.e@gmail.com; thpo@wampanoagtribe-nsn.gov;bonney.hartley@mohican-nsn.gov; Brian.Weeden@mwtribe-nsn.gov; mbejjani8@gmail.com; pgozemba@gmail.com; pgozemba@gmail.com;barbara.warren@salemsound.org; amvd2003@yahoo.com; rickhaigis@hotmail.com;info@salem4all.com; shay_bailey3377@yahoo.com; fcordole@ucsc.edu;gvelonis@nichols-village.com; nina@vyed.in; susanne.m.may@gmail.com;may.eabos@gmail.com; loreleestewart@gmail.com; mickey@northshorecdc.org;cmadore@salem.com; rordaz@harborlightcp.org; amyeveritt@comcast.net;lesley.niccolini@childrens.harvard.edu; bgrable@rightathomemass.com;rwjsteacher@gmail.com; katiemackay22@gmail.com; cjuliewhitlow@gmail.com;ommerchan@gmail.com; wendymeigs@yahoo.com; emily_udy@yahoo.com; pwilbert2@gmail.com; tarnold@salem.com; tomycoff@verizon.net; kdriscoll@salem.com;dpangallo@salem.com; tdaniel@salem.com; achiancola@salem.com;cmoskos@salem.com; dlaroe@salem.com; jbarry@salem.com; pobrien@salem.com;ebisono@salem.com; ebisono@salem.com; pkelleher@salem.com;paul.tucker@mahouse.gov; joan.lovely@masenate.gov; rmccarthy@salem.com;cwatsonfelt@salem.com; pmorsillo@salem.com; lmcclain@salem.com;jcohen@salem.com; mriccardi@salem.com; avarela@salem.com; amerkl@salem.com;ddominguez@salem.com; cprosniewski@salem.com; thapworth@salem.com;jwessell@salem.comCc:MEPA-EJ@mass.gov; ckoslow@beaconcommunitiesllc.com; choog@salemha.org; AnnMartonSubject:Leefort Terrace, 1 & 2 Lee Fort Terrace, Salem, MA - MEPA Advance NoticeEnvironmental Justice Screening FormAttachments:Leefort Terrace EJ Screening Form-English.pdf; Leefort Terrace EJ Screening Form-Haitian Creole.pdf; Leefort Terrace EJ Screening Form-Portuguese.pdf; Leefort Terrace EJScreening Form-Spanish.pdf Community-based organizations and tribal organizations are receiving this notification in accordance with the MEPA Public Involvement Protocol for Environmental Justice Populations, which took effect on January 1, 2022. More information is available on the MEPA website. If you provided your email address as part of the Leefort Terrace Community Outreach Process, you also are receiving this notification as an expansion of the MEPA Public Involvement Protocol.The Environmental Justice Screening Form 2 also will be posted to the Leefort Terrace Website.Lastly, paper copies of the notice will be delivered to each of the current residents of Lee Fort Terrace. The EEA EJ census track identified language isolation of Spanish, Portuguese, and French Creole within a 5 -mile geographic area from the project site.Therefore, the Environmental Justice Screening Form has been translated into each of these languages. On The Water with LEC!June Adventure:Murkwood Conservation Area Visit our website at www.lecenvironmental.com for a full listing of our services. Sharon Sullivan Permitting Technician LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. 380 Lowell Street, Suite 101, Wakefield, MA 01880 Office: 781.245.2500 WAKEFIELD, MA PLYMOUTH, MA WORCESTER, MA RINDGE, NH EAST PROVIDENCE, RI This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information.Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. LEC is a certified Women's Business Enterprise (WBE) in MA & RI and a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) in CT, MA, ME, NH, RI & VT. Leefort Terrace Web Page 45-Day Notice Write Up ENGLISH As part of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) process for permitting redevelopment of Leefort Terrace, we are hereby providing the attached MEPA Advance Notice Environmental Justice Screening notification form to community-based organizations, tribal organizations, and individuals who provided their email address as part of the Leefort Terrace com munity outreach process and who signed up to receive notifications on leefortterrace.com.We are providing this form in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and Haitian Creole.Circulating this form is in accordance with the MEPA Public Involvement Protocol for Environmental Justice Populations.Paper copies of the notice also will be delivered to each of the current residents of Leefort Terrace. MEPA is a state process intended to facilitate environmental planning and input by state and local agencies,and the general public on projects that meet certain thresholds.Leefort Terrace requires MEPA review because the project is receiving state funded financial assistance and requires a Waterways License from a state agency.A MEPA Consultation Session will be scheduled for the project team to present the project and for MEPA Staff, State Agencies, a nd the public to ask questions.The date and time for the MEPA Consultation Session will be posted on the Environmental Monitor under the Site Visits tab and a legal advertisement will appear in the Salem News.We will also send out an update and time for the MEPA Consultation Session via the same methods we have distributed this notice. PORTUGUESE Como parte do processo da Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA -Lei de Política Ambiental de Massachusetts) para permitir o redesenvolvimento de Leefort Terrace, estamos fornecendo o formulário anexo de notificação de Triagem de Justiça Ambiental da Notificação Antecipada da MEPA às organizações baseadas na comunidade, às organizações tribais, e aos indivíduos que forneceram seus endereços de e-mail durante o processo de extensão à comunidade do Leefort Terrace, que se inscreveram para receber notificações no site leefortterrace.com. Estamos fornecendo este formulário em inglês, espanhol, português e crioulo haitiano. A circulação deste formulário é feita conforme o Protocolo de Envolvimento Público da MEPA para Populações de Justiça Ambiental.Também serão entregas cópias impressas desta notificação a cada um dos atuais residentes de Leefort Terrace. A MEPA encontra-se em um processo estadual que visa facilitar o planejamento ambiental e a contribuição pelos órgãos estaduais e locais,e pelo público em geral sobre projetos que atingem determinados limites.O Leefort Terrace requer uma revisão da MEPA porque o projeto está recebendo assistência financeira do estado, e requer uma Licença para Vias Navegáveis de um órgão estadual. Uma Sessão de Consulta da MEPA será marcada para que a equipe do projeto apresente o projeto, e a Equipe da MEPA, os Órgãos Estaduais e o público possam fazer perguntas. A data e horário da Sessão de Consulta da MEPA serão postados no site Environmental Monitor ( Ambiental),na guia Site Visits (Visitas às obras) e um anúncio legal será veiculado no Salem News. Também enviaremos uma atualização e o horário da Consulta da MEPA pelos mesmos métodos que usamos para distribuir esta notificação. SPANISH Como parte del proceso de la Ley de Política Ambiental de Massachusetts (MEPA, por sus siglas en inglés) para permitir la reurbanización de Leefort Terrace, proporcionamos el formulario adjunto de Pre Aviso de Evaluación de Justicia Ambiental de MEPA a organizaciones comunitarias, organizaciones tribales e individuos que proporcionaron su dirección de correo electrónico como parte del proceso de alcance comunitario de Leefort Terrace y que se inscribieron para recibir notificaciones en leefortterrace.com. Este formulario está disponible en inglés, español, portugués y criollo haitiano. La circulación de este formulario está en conformidad con el Protocolo de Participación Pública para Poblaciones de Justicia Ambiental de MEPA. También se entregarán copias en papel de la notificación a cada uno de los actuales residentes de Leefort Terrace. MEPA es un proceso estatal destinado a facilitar la planificación ambiental y la participación de las agencias estatales y locales, y el público en general, en los proyectos que cumplen con determinados parámetros. Leefort Terrace requiere la revisión de MEPA porque el proyecto está recibiendo ayuda financiera del estado y requiere un permiso de vías fluviales de una agencia estatal. Se programará una sesión de consulta de MEPA para que el equipo del proyecto pueda presentar el proyecto, y el equipo de MEPA, las agencias estatales y el público puedan hacer preguntas. La fecha y la hora de la sesión de consulta de MEPA se publicarán en el sitio web Environmental Monitor, en la pestaña “Site visits”, y se publicará un aviso legal en Salem News. También enviaremos una actualización y el horario de la Sesión de Consulta de MEPA a través de los mismos métodos que hemos distribuido este aviso. HAITIAN CREOLE Pou pwosesis Lwa sou Politik Anviwònman Massachusetts (MEPA) pou otorize redevlopman Leefort Terrace, palaprezant nou bay òganizasyon kominotè yo, òganizasyon tribi yo ak moun apa ki te bay adrès imèl yo nan kad pwosesis sansibilizasyon kominotè Leefort Terrace la epi ki te ki enskri pou resevwa notifikasyon sou leefortterrace.com,fòm Preyavi MEPA Evalyasyon Jistis Anviwònmantal (MEPA Advance Notice Environmental Justice Screening) lan. Nou bay fòm sa a ann Anglè, Panyòl, Pòtigè ak Kreyòl Ayisyen. Difizyon fòm sa a ann konfòmite ak Pwotokòl Patisipasyon Piblik MEPA a pou Popilasyon Jistis Anviwònman (MEPA Public Involvement Protocol for Environmental Justice Populations) yo. Epitou yo pral bay chak moun ki rete jodi a Leefort Terrace yon kopi papye avi a. MEPA se yon pwosesis Eta a ki fasilite planifikasyon anviwònman an ak pou resevwa opinyon ajans leta ak lokal yo, ak opinyon piblik la alawonnbadè sou pwojè ki reponn ak sèten karakteristik.Leefort Terrace egzije yo revizye MEPA paske pwojè a resevwa asistans finansyè nan men Eta a epi li egzije yon Lisans pou Vwa navigab nan men yon ajans Eta a. Y ap pwograme yon Seyans konsiltasyon MEPA pou ekip pwojè a pou li prezante pwojè a epi pou Estaf MEPA, Ajans Eta a yo ak piblik la pou yo ka poze kesyon. Dat ak lè sesyon konsiltasyon MEPA a pral afiche sou Monitè Anviwònmantal (Environmental Monitor ann Anglè) lan ki anba onglè Vizit Sit (Site Visit) la epi yon anons legal pral parèt nan Salem News.N ap voye yon mizajou ak lè sesyon konsiltasyon MEPA a tou grasa menm metòd nou te distribye avi sa a. 1 Environmental Justice Screening Form Project Name Leefort Terrace Anticipated Date of MEPA Filing August 1, 2022 Proponent Name BC Leefort Terrace LLC c/o Beacon Communities and Salem Housing Authority Contact Information (e.g., consultant) Ann M. Marton, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Public website for project or other physical location where project materials can be obtained (if available) https://www.leefortterrace.com Municipality and Zip Code for Project (if known) Salem, MA 01970 Project Type* (list all that apply) Residential Is the project site within a mapped 100-year FEMA flood plain? Y/N/ unknown Yes Estimated GHG emissions of conditioned spaces (click here for GHG Estimation tool) All electric building that will be certified to Passive House Standards. Project Description 1. Provide a brief project description, including overall size of the project site and square footage of proposed buildings and structures if known. Replace 50 obsolete, one-bedroom garden style state public housing apartments for elderly and disabled households constructed in 1958 with 124, 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments on a 3.42± acre site. The building footprint encompasses 33,800± SF. Site amenities include garage and surface parking, residential outdoor community space, and 1.26± acres of public open space. 2. List anticipated MEPA review thresholds (301 CMR 11.03) (if known).  Agency Action through Financial Assistance and DEP Waterways Water Dependent Use License  Review threshold at 11.03 (3)(b)1.f. for alteration of ½ or more acres of any other wetland (Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage) that coincides with Commonwealth Tideland Jurisdiction requiring the aforementioned Waterways License 3. List all anticipated state, local and federal permits needed for the project (if known)  Order of Conditions from the Salem Conservation Commission  Comprehensive Permit from the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals  DEP Waterways License for Water Dependent Use in Commonwealth Tidelands 4. Identify EJ populations and characteristics (Minority, Income, English Isolation) within 5 miles of project site (can attach map identifying 5-mile radius from EJ Maps Viewer in lieu of narrative) Minority, Income, English Isolation-Spanish, Portuguese, French Creole 2 5. Identify any municipality or census tract meeting the definition of “vulnerable health EJ criteria” in the DPH EJ Tool located in whole or in part within a 1 mile radius of the project site Cities of Salem and Beverly  Elevated Blood Lead Prevalence  Low Birth Weight 6. Identify potential short-term and long-term environmental and public health impacts that may affect EJ Populations and any anticipated mitigation. Potential Short-Term and Long-Term Public Health Impacts:  Climate Change impacts and continued/increased elevations of coastal flooding  Continued occupation of 50 obsolete, low quality, garden-style one-bedroom rental units  Continued resident problems with climate control, pests, outdated kitchen and bath facilities, and inadequate handicap accessibility  Low value, resident only open space (grass and trees) with limited off-street parking  Mold and asbestos exposure in current buildings  Construction related emissions (dust, CO2 emissions)  Construction related truck routes and traffic congestion Anticipated Mitigation:  Demolish obsolete buildings and recycle/reuse building materials as feasible  Site grading to raise the majority of the property out of the current floodplain elevation  Resilient design for residential space elevated above current and future projected floodplain elevations  Passive House building design (energy efficient heating and cooling, insulation, windows, roof and floor slab, ventilation)  All electric building (heat, a/c, hot water) with solar PV electrical generation on-site  Low VOC building materials and as many carbon sequestering and regenerative building materials, as feasible  Community room, fitness center, and wellness center for residential use; full-time resident service coordinator  Garage and surface parking with garage bike storage enclosure and EV charging stations  Landscaped property with resident outdoor patios, bocce courts, victory garden  Creation of public open space  Connection of the site with Collins Cove and the bike path  Dust control and enforced truck idling limitations 7. Identify project benefits, including “Environmental Benefits” as defined in 301 CMR 11.02, that may improve environmental conditions or public health of the EJ population.  1.26± acre publicly accessible open space with benches, pedestrian lighting, pathways, etc.  Connection of the site with Collins Cove and the bike path  50 replacement, code compliant, Passive House Replacement Affordable rental units  74 new, code compliant, Passive House Affordable rental units  Cost-efficient and energy efficient building designed to Passive House Standards for clean air using low VOC and as many carbon sequestering and regenerative building materials, as feasible  Garage Bike storage and EV Charging stations to support alternative modes of transportation and electric versus gas vehicle usage  All electric building (heat, a/c, hot water) with solar PV electrical generation on-site  Incorporating Universal Design Principles and accessibility to people of all abilities and disabilities 3 8. Describe how the community can request a meeting to discuss the project, and how the community can request oral language interpretation services at the meeting. Specify how to request other accommodations, including meetings after business hours and at locations near public transportation. Contact the following Beacon Development Director for any of the above requests or services: Courtney Koslow, Development Director Beacon Communities LLC Phone: 617-574-1113 TTY: 711 Email: ckoslow@BeaconCommunitiesLLC.com 1 Formulário de Triagem para Justiça Ambiental Nome do Projeto Leefort Terrace Data prevista do protocolamento perante a Lei de Política Ambiental de Massachusetts (MEPA) 1 de agosto de 2022 Nome do proponente BC Leefort Terrace LLC c/o Autoridade em Habitação das Comunidades de Beacon e Salem Informações de contato (ex., consultor) Ann M. Marton, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Site público do projeto ou outro local físico onde os materiais do projeto podem ser adquiridos (se disponível) https://www.leefortterrace.com Municipalidade e código ZIP do projeto (se souber) Salem, MA 01970 Tipo de projeto* (listar tudo o que se aplicar) Residencial O local do projeto está dentro de uma planície de inundação de 100 anos mapeada pela FEMA? S/N/Não sabe Sim Estimativa de emissões de gases de efeito estufa (GHG) dos espaços acondicionados (clique aqui para ver a ferramenta de estimativa de GHG) Toda a construção elétrica que será certificada em relação às Normas de Casa Passiva. Descrição do projeto 1. Fornecer uma breve descrição do projeto, incluindo o porte geral do local do projeto e a metragem quadrada (ou pés quadrados) das edificações e estruturas propostas (se souber). Substituir 50 apartamentos obsoletos de moradia pública do estado no estilo de “apartamento com jardim” de um dormitório destinados a moradores idosos e deficientes, que foram construídos em 1958, por 124 apartamentos de um, dois e três dormitórios em uma área de aproximadamente 1,38 hectares (3.42 acres). A planta da construção inclui aproximadamente 3.140 m2 (33.800 pés quadrados). As comodidades do local incluem garagem e estacionamento em área aberta, espaço comunitário ao ar livre para os residentes e aproximadamente 50 hectares (1.26 acres) de espaço público aberto. 2. Listar os limiares previstos da análise da MEPA (301 CMR 11.03) (se souber).  Ação por parte da agência através de subsídio financeiro e da Licença de Águas Fluviais emitida pelo Departamento de Proteção Ambiental (DEP) para Uso Dependente das Águas  Revisão do limiar na cláusula 11.03 (3)(b)1.f. referente à alteração de metade ou mais hectares (acres) de quaisquer outros pântanos (terras sujeitas ao escoamento de tempestades costais), que coincide com a Jurisdição do Estuário da Comunidade (Commonwealth Tideland Jurisdiction) que exige a Licença de Águas Fluviais acima mencionada. 2 3. Listar todas as licenças estaduais, municipais e federais previstas necessárias para o projeto (se souber)  Pedido das Condições (Order of Conditions) por parte da Comissão de Conservação de Salem (Salem Conservation Commission)  Licença completa por parte do Conselho de Apelos de Zoneamento de Salem (Salem Zoning Board of Appeals)  Licença de Águas Fluviais emitida pelo Departamento de Proteção Ambiental (DEP) para Uso Dependente das Águas no Estuário da Comunidade (Commonwealth Tidelands) 4. Identificar a população protegida pela Justiça Ambiental (EJ) e as características (minoria, renda, isolamento do inglês) no raio de 8 km (5 milhas) do local do projeto (pode anexar um mapa identificando o raio dos 8 km (5 milhas) usando o recurso EJ Maps Viewer em vez de descrição). Minoria, renda, isolamento do inglês-espanhol, português, crioulo francês 5. Identificar qualquer trato municipal ou de censo que satisfaça a definição de “critério de vulnerabilidade da saúde de acordo com a EJ ” na ferramenta DPH EJ Tool localizados na totalidade ou em parte dentro do raio de 1,60 km (1 milha) do local do projeto. Cidades de Salem e Beverly  Prevalência de alto nível de chumbo no sangue  Baixo peso no nascimento 6. Identificar possíveis impactos de curto e de longo prazos na saúde pública e no meio ambiente que possam afetar as populações protegidas pela EJ e qualquer resolução prevista. Possíveis impactos de curto e longo prazos na saúde pública:  Impactos da mudança climática e elevações contínuas/aumentadas das inundações costais  Ocupação continuada das 50 unidades obsoletas de aluguel com um quarto no estilo “jardim” e de baixa qualidade  Problemas continuados dos residentes com relação ao controle de temperatura climática, pestes, instalações desatualizadas de cozinha e banheiro, além de acessibilidade inadequada para deficientes  Área aberta de baixo valor apenas para residentes (grama e árvores) com estacionamento limitado fora da rua  Exposição a mofo e asbestos nas edificações atuais  Emissões relacionadas com a construção (poeira, emissões de CO2)  Congestionamento de trânsito e rotas para caminhões relacionado com a construção Resolução prevista:  Demolir os prédios obsoletos e reciclar/reutilizar os materiais de construção conforme viabilidade  Nivelamento do local para elevar e distanciar a maior parte da propriedade em relação à atual elevação do terreno contra inundações  Projeto resiliente para o espaço residencial elevado acima das elevações atuais e futuras projetadas para os terrenos contra inundações  Projeto de construção baseado em “casa passiva”, ou seja, aquecimento e resfriamento, isolamento térmico, janelas, telhado e laje, ventilação que economizam energia  Toda construção elétrica (aquecimento, ar condicionado, água quente) com geração de energia elétrica fotovoltaica solar (conhecido como PV em inglês) no próprio local  Materiais de construção com poucos compostos orgânicos voláteis (conhecidos como VOC em inglês) e o máximo de materiais de construção regenerativos e que sequestram carbono, conforme a viabilidade  Salão comunitário, academia de ginástica e centro de bem-estar para uso dos residentes; coordenador em período integral para prestar serviços aos residentes 3  Garagem e estacionamento em área aberta com local fechado para guardar bicicletas e estações para recarregar carros elétricos  Propriedade cercada por jardins com áreas externas para os residentes, quadras de bocha e jardim estilo vitoriano  Criação de espaço aberto para o público  Conexão do local com a Collins Cove e a ciclovia  Controle de poeira e limitações aplicadas a caminhões no modo ocioso 7. Identificar os benefícios do projeto, incluindo os “benefícios ambientais”, conforme definição da cláusula 301 CMR 11.02, que podem melhorar as condições ambientais ou a saúde pública da população protegida pela Jurisdição Ambiental (EJ).  Aproximadamente 50 hectares (1.26 acres) de espaço aberto acessível ao público com bancos, iluminação para pedestres, caminhos (vias), etc.  Conexão do local com a Collins Cove e a ciclovia  Substituição de 50 unidades de aluguel em conformidade com o Código e a Lei de Acessibilidade à Substituição para Casa Passiva  74 unidades de aluguel novas em conformidade com o Código e a Lei de Acessibilidade à Substituição para Casa Passiva  Construção com economia de custos e energia elaborada de acordo com as Normas de Casa Passiva para gerar ar limpo usando poucos compostos orgânicos voláteis (conhecidos como VOC em inglês) e o máximo de materiais de construção regenerativos e que sequestram carbono, conforme a viabilidade  Garagem para guardar bicicletas e estações para recarregar carros elétricos visando incentivar meios alternativos de transporte e o uso de carros elétricos em relação aos carros movidos a combustível  Toda construção elétrica (aquecimento, ar condicionado, água quente) com geração de energia elétrica fotovoltaica solar (conhecido como PV em inglês) no próprio local  Incorporação dos Princípios do Design Universal e acessibilidade às pessoas de todas as habilidades e deficiências 8. Descrever como a comunidade pode solicitar uma reunião para discutir o projeto, e como a comunidade pode solicitar serviços de interpretação na reunião. Especificar como solicitar outros arranjos, incluindo reuniões após o expediente e em locais próximos a transporte público. Entrar em contato com a Diretora de Desenvolvimento de Beacon abaixo para qualquer uma das solicitações ou serviços acima mencionados: Courtney Koslow, Diretora de Desenvolvimento Beacon Communities LLC Telefone: 617-574-1113 TTY: 711 E-mail: ckoslow@BeaconCommunitiesLLC.com 1 Formulario de evaluación de justicia ambiental Nombre del proyecto Leefort Terrace Fecha prevista de presentación ante MEPA 1 de agosto de 2022 Nombre del proponente BC Leefort Terrace LLC, a la atención de Beacon Communities y la Autoridad de Vivienda de Salem Información de contacto (p. ej., consultor) Ann M. Marton, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Sitio web público del proyecto u otra ubicación física donde se pueden obtener materiales del proyecto (si está disponible) https://www.leefortterrace.com Municipio y código postal del proyecto (si se lo conoce) Salem, MA 01970 Tipo de proyecto* (indique todos los que correspondan) Residencial ¿Se encuentra el sitio del proyecto dentro de un terreno inundable dentro de 100 años mapeado por la FEMA? Sí/No/Se desconoce Sí Emisiones estimadas de GHG (Gases de Efecto Invernadero) de los espacios acondicionados (haga clic aquí para acceder a la herramienta de estimación de GEI) Todos los edificios eléctricos que se certificarán según los Estándares de Casa Pasiva. Descripción del proyecto 1. Proporcione una breve descripción del proyecto, incluidos el tamaño total del sitio del proyecto y los pies cuadrados de los edificios y las estructuras propuestos, si se conocen. Reemplazar 50 apartamentos obsoletos de vivienda pública del estado, de un dormitorio y de estilo con jardín (garden style), destinados a ancianos y personas con discapacidades, construidos en 1958, por 124 apartamentos de uno, dos y tres dormitorios, en un sitio de 3.42± acres. El espacio de construcción es de 33,800± pies cuadrados. Las instalaciones del sitio incluyen garaje, un área de estacionamiento en superficie, un espacio comunitario al aire libre para residentes y 1.26± acres de espacio público abierto. 2. Indique los niveles de revisión previstos por MEPA (301 CMR 11.03) (si se conocen). • Medidas adoptadas por la Agencia mediante asistencia financiera y una autorización para realizar actividades que dependen del agua, del Programa de Vías Fluviales del Departamento de Protección Ambiental (DEP).  Umbral de revisión según el artículo 11.03 (3)(b)1.f. para la alteración de ½ acre o más de cualquier otro humedal (terreno sujeto al flujo de tormentas costeras), que forme parte de la Jurisdicción de Marismas de la Mancomunidad y que requiera la autorización del Programa de Vías Fluviales indicada anteriormente. 2 3. Enumere todos los permisos locales, federales y estatales que prevé que se necesitarán para el proyecto (si se conocen).  Orden de condiciones de la Comisión de Conservación de Salem.  Permiso integral de la Junta de Apelaciones de Zonificación de Salem.  Autorización para realizar actividades que dependen del agua, del Programa de Vías Fluviales del DEP en marismas de la Mancomunidad. 4. Identifique las poblaciones y características de justicia ambiental (EJ) (minoría, ingresos, aislamiento inglés) dentro de las 5 millas del sitio del proyecto (puede adjuntar un mapa que identifique un radio de 5 millas desde la opción Visor de mapas de EJ en lugar de texto) Minorías, personas con bajos ingresos, personas con un dominio limitado del inglés que hablan español, portugués, lenguas criollas de base francesa. 5. Identifique cualquier municipio o sección censal que cumpla con la definición de “criterios de población de EJ con salud vulnerable” en la Herramienta de EJ del Departamento de Salud Pública (DPH) ubicado en su totalidad o en parte dentro de un radio de 1 milla del sitio del proyecto. Ciudades de Salem y Beverly  Niveles elevados frecuentes de plomo en sangre  Bajo peso al nacer 6. Identifique los potenciales impactos a corto y largo plazo sobre el ambiente y la salud pública que pueden afectar a las poblaciones de EJ y cualquier mitigación prevista. Posibles impactos en la salud pública a corto y a largo plazo:  Impactos en el cambio climático y persistencia o aumento en la elevación de las inundaciones costeras.  Ocupación continua de 50 unidades de alquiler obsoletas, de un dormitorio, de baja calidad y de estilo “garden” (jardín).  Constantes problemas de los residentes con el control del clima, las plagas, las instalaciones de cocina y baño anticuadas y la inadecuada accesibilidad para discapacitados.  Espacio abierto (césped y árboles) de bajo valor y solo para residentes, con estacionamiento limitado fuera de la vía pública.  Exposición a moho y asbesto en construcciones actuales.  Emisiones relacionadas con la construcción (polvo, emisiones de CO2).  Congestión del tránsito y recorridos de camiones relacionados con la construcción. Mitigación prevista:  Demolición de edificios obsoletos y reciclaje/reutilización de materiales de construcción, según sea posible.  Nivelación del sitio, para elevar la mayor parte de la propiedad por encima del nivel de elevación actual del terreno inundable.  Diseño resistente para el espacio residencial elevado por encima de las elevaciones de la llanura de inundación actuales y futuras.  Diseño de construcción según los Estándares de Casa Pasiva (calefacción y refrigeración eficientes, aislamiento, ventanas, losas para pisos y techos, y ventilación).  Edificio totalmente eléctrico (calefacción, aire acondicionado, agua caliente) con generación de energía solar fotovoltaica en el sitio.  Materiales de construcción con bajo contenido de compuestos orgánicos volátiles (VOC), y la mayor cantidad posible de materiales de construcción regenerativos y que absorben dióxido de carbono. 3  Salón comunitario, gimnasio y centro de bienestar para uso de los residentes; coordinador de servicios para residentes a tiempo completo.  Garaje y estacionamiento al descubierto, con espacio para guardar bicicletas en el garaje y estaciones de carga para vehículos eléctricos.  Propiedad diseñada por un paisajista, con patios al aire libre, canchas de bochas y huerta para residentes.  Creación de espacio público abierto.  Conexión del sitio con Collins Cove y la senda para bicicletas.  Control del polvo y restricciones obligatorias para camiones detenidos con el motor en marcha. 7. Identificar los beneficios del proyecto, incluidos los “Beneficios Ambientales” según el artículo 11.02 de la Norma 301 del CMR, que pueden mejorar las condiciones ambientales o la salud pública de la población de justicia ambiental (JE).  1.26± acres de espacio abierto de acceso público, con bancos, iluminación de áreas peatonales, senderos, etc.  Conexión del sitio con Collins Cove y la ciclovía.  50 unidades de alquiler asequible de reemplazo, que cumplen con el código de Casa Pasiva.  74 unidades de alquiler nuevas asequibles, conforme a los Estándares de Casa Pasiva.  Construcción eficiente en función de los costos y en términos energéticos, de acuerdo con los estándares de Casa Pasiva sobre pureza del aire, con materiales de construcción con bajo contenido de VOC, y con la mayor cantidad posible de materiales de construcción regenerativos y que absorben dióxido de carbono.  Espacio para guardar bicicletas en el garaje y estaciones de carga de vehículos eléctricos, para apoyar medios alternativos de transporte y el uso de vehículos eléctricos en lugar de vehículos a combustible.  Edificio totalmente eléctrico (calefacción, aire acondicionado, agua caliente) con generación eléctrica solar fotovoltaica en el propio edificio.  Incorporación de los principios de diseño universal y accesibilidad para personas con cualquier capacidad o discapacidad. 8. Describir cómo la comunidad puede solicitar una reunión para analizar el proyecto y cómo puede pedir servicios de interpretación para dicha reunión. Especificar cómo solicitar otras adaptaciones, lo que incluye reuniones programadas fuera del horario laboral y en lugares cercanos al transporte público. Comuníquese con la Directora de Desarrollo de Beacon que se indica a continuación para obtener más información sobre las solicitudes o los servicios mencionados con anterioridad: Courtney Koslow, Directora de Desarrollo Beacon Communities LLC Teléfono: 617-574-1113 – Teletipo (TTY): 711 Correo electrónico: ckoslow@BeaconCommunitiesLLC.com 1 Fòm pou Revizyon Jistis Anviwònman Non Pwojè a Leefort Terrace Dat yo Prevwa pou Ranpli MEPA 1ye Out 2022 Non Nominatè a BC Leefort Terrace LLC atravè Kominote Beacon ak Otorite Lojman Salem Detay pou Kontak (pou egzanp: konsiltan) Ann M. Marton, LEC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Sit entènèt pwojè piblik oswa lòt kote fizik kote yo ka jwenn materyèl pwojè (si disponib) https://www.leefortterrace.com Minisipalite ak kòd postal pwojè a (si yo konnen yo) Salem, MA 01970 Kalite pwojè* (fè lis tout sa ki aplikab) Rezidansyèl Èske sit pwojè a nan yon plèn inondasyon chak 100 lane FEMA mape deja? Wi/Non/Pa konnen Wi Estimasyon emisyon Gaz lakòz efè tèmik (GHG an angle) ki soti nan espas ki gen èkondisyone (klike la a pou zouti estimasyon GHG a) Nenpòt bilding elektrik ki pral sètifye nan Estanda Kay pasif. Deskripsyon Pwojè a 1. Bay yon deskripsyon tou kout sou pwojè a, ki gen ladan gwosè jeneral sit pwojè a ak dimansyon an pye kare chak bilding ak estrikti ki pwopoze, si enfòmasyon a disponib. Ranplase 50 apatman piblik demode yon chanm ak jaden pou lojman moun ki fin granmoun ak andikape ki te konstwi nan lane 1958 ak 124 apatman ki gen youn, de, ak twa chanm sou yon sit anviwon 3.42 kawo tè. Anprent bilding lan anglobe anviwon 33,800 pye kare. Sit la ap ekipe ak yon garaj epi ak yon sifas pakin, yon espas deyò pou rezidan yo ak anviwon 1.26 kawo tè espas piblik lib.. 2. Etabli lis nivo minimal revizyon MEPA ki planifye yo (301 CMR 11.03) (si ou konnen yo).  Aksyon Ajans atravè Asistans Finansyè ak Lisans Itilizasyon ki Depandan sou Dlo DEP Waterway a  pou chanjman nan ½ kawo tè oswa plis nan nenpòt lòt Tè marekaj (Tè ki sibi inondasyon nan tanpèt bò lanmè) ki korespon ak jiridiksyon Tè Mare Commonwealth la ki egzije Lisans Waterways (Vwa Maritim) yo mansyone pi wo a. 3. Etabli lis tout pèmi eta, lokal, ak federal yo prevwa ki nesesè pou pwojè a (si ou konnen yo)  Lòd Kondisyon Komisyon Konsèvasyon Salem  Pèmi konplè ki soti nan Komisyon Apèl Zonifikasyon Salem la  Lisans DEP Waterways pou yon itilizasyon ki depandan sou dlo nan Tè Mare Commonwealth la 4. Idantifye popilasyon Jistis Anviwònman (EJ an angle) ak karakteristik yo (Minorite etnik, Revni, Izolasyon lang Angle) nan yon distans 5 mil nan sit pwojè a (ka tache kat jeyografik ki idantifye reyon 5 mil nan EJ Maps Viewer olye de narasyon) Minorite etnik, Revni, Izolasyon lang Angle -Panyòl, Pòtigè, Kreyòl Ayisyen 2 5. Idantifye nenpòt minisipalite oswa zòn resansman ki satisfè definisyon "kritè EJ pou sante vilnerab" nan Zouti EJ DPH a ki sitiye an antye oswa an pati nan yon reyon 1 mil nan sit pwojè a. Vil Salem ak Beverly  Pousantaj plon nan san ki pi wo pase mwayèn nan  Pwa nesans ki ba 6. Idantifye potansyèl enpak sou anviwònman ak sante piblik a koutèm ak alontèm ki ka afekte popilasyon EJ yo ak nenpòt mezi mitigasyon ki planifye. Konsekans potansyèl Sante Piblik a Kout tèm ak alontèm:  Konsekans chanjman nan klima ak kontinye/ogmantasyon elevasyon inondasyon bò lanmè  Okipasyon kontinyèl 50 inite lojamn yon chanm nan estil jaden ki demode pou lokasyon  Pwoblèm rezidan kontinyèl ak kontwòl tanperati ak klima, ensèk nwizib, kwizin ak enstalasyon twalèt ki demode, ak aksè ensifizan pou moun ki gen andikap.  Espas ouvè ki rezève pou rezidan yo pa gen okenn valè (zèb ak pye bwa sèlman), ak pakin limite bò twotwa.  Ekspozisyon ak kote ki mwazi oswa ki gen amyant nan bilding aktyèl yo  Emisyon ki gen rapò ak konstriksyon (pousyè, emisyon CO2)  Wout kamyon ki gen rapò ak konstriksyon ak anbouteyaj Amelyorasyon yo prevwa:  Demoli bilding demode yo epi resikle/reitilize materyo konstriksyon kote sa posib  Terasman sit la pou ogmante majorite pwopriyete pi wo pase elevasyon aktyèl plenn inondasyon an  Konsepsyon fleksib pou espas rezidansyèl ki elve pi wo pase plenn nivo plenn inondasyon aktyèl ak sa ki pwojte nan lavni.  Konsepsyon kay pasif (chofaj ak refwadisman enèji efikas, izolasyon, fenèt, do-kay ak plak etaj, vantilasyon)  Bilding konplètman elektrik (chofaj, èkondisyone, dlo cho) ak pwodiksyon elektrisite fotovoltayik solè sou plas  Materyèl konstriksyon ki gen yon fèb konpozisyon òganik volatil (VOC ann Angle) ak otan ke posib materyèl pou trape ak rejenere kabòn  Sal kominotè, sant edikasyon fizik ak sant byennèt pou itilizasyon rezidansyèl; kowòdonatè sèvis rezidan aplentan  Garaj ak pakin nan nivo wout ki gen depo bisiklèt ak estasyon rechaje machin elektrik  Pwopriyete jaden ak teras deyò pou rezidan, teren pétank, jaden viktwa  Kreyasyon espas piblik ouvè  Konekte sit la ak Collins Cove ak chemen bisiklèt la  Kontwòle pousyè tè ak ranfòsman limit vitès kamyon yo 7. Idantifye benefis pwojè yo, enkli "benefis anviwònman" jan sa defini nan 301 CMR 11.02, ki ka amelyore kondisyon anviwònman oswa sante piblik popilasyon EJ la.  ± 1.26 kawo tè espas ouvè deyò piblik ki aksesib ak ban, ekleraj pyeton, chemen, elatriye.  Konekte sit la ak Collins Cove ak chemen bisiklèt la  50 inite lokasyon pou ranplasman kay pasif, abòdab, ki konfòm ak kòd konstwiksyon yo  74 nouvo inite pou lokasyon kay pasif abòdab ki respekte kòd konstwiksyon yo  Konstriksyon optimal ak enèji efikas ki fèt nan estanda kay pasif pou lè pwòp lè l sèvi avèk VOC ki ba epi otan sa posib ak materyèl konstwiksyn ki sekestre ak rejenere kabòn.  Garaj depo bisiklèt ak estasyon chaj machin elektrik pou sipòte lòt mòd transpò ak itilizasyon machin elektrik pito pase gaz.  Bilding totalman elektrik (chofaj, èkondisyone, dlo cho) ak pwodiksyon elektrisite solè fotovoltayik souplas. 3  Entegre prensip konsepsyon inivèsèl ak aksè pou moun tout nivo kapasite ak andikap 8. Dekri kijan kominote a ka mande yon reyinyon pou diskite sou pwojè a, ak kijan kominote a ka mande sèvis tradiksyon nan bouch nan lang oral pandan reyinyon an. Endike kijan pou mande lòt aranjman, tankou reyinyon apre lè travay yo ak nan kote ki toupre transpò piblik. Kontakte Direktè Devlopman Beacon sa a pou nenpòt nan demann oswa sèvis ki endike anwo yo: Courtney Koslow, Development Director Beacon Communities LLC Telefòn: 617-574-1113 TTY: 711 Imèl: ckoslow@BeaconCommunitiesLLC.com 2/3 EJScreen Report Superfund NPL Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDF) Sites reporting to EPA 1 mile Ring around the Area, MASSACHUSETTS, EPA Region 1 Approximate Population: 14,700 1 mile Buffer August 09, 2022 Input Area (sq. miles): 3.47 (Version 2.0) 0 1 EJScreen Report Value State Avg. %ile in State EPA Region Avg. %ile in EPA Region USA Avg. %ile in USA 3/3 RMP Facility Proximity (facility count/km distance) Hazardous Waste Proximity (facility count/km distance) Wastewater Discharge (toxicity-weighted concentration/m distance) Demographic Index Over Age 64 People of Color Low Income Unemployment Rate Less Than High School Education Under Age 5 Demographic Indicators EJScreen is a screening tool for pre-decisional use only. It can help identify areas that may warrant additional consideration, analysis, or outreach. It does not provide a basis for decision-making, but it may help identify potential areas of EJ concern. Users should keep in mind that screening tools are subject to substantial uncertainty in their demographic and environmental data, particularly when looking at small geographic areas. Important caveats and uncertainties apply to this screening-level information, so it is essential to understand the limitations on appropriate interpretations and applications of these indicators. Please see EJScreen documentation for discussion of these issues before using reports. This screening tool does not provide data on every environmental impact and demographic factor that may be relevant to a particular location. EJScreen outputs should be supplemented with additional information and local knowledge before taking any action to address potential EJ concerns. Selected Variables Pollution and Sources Particulate Matter 2.5 (µg/m3) Ozone (ppb) 2017 Diesel Particulate Matter* (µg/m3) 2017 Air Toxics Cancer Risk* (lifetime risk per million) 2017 Air Toxics Respiratory HI* Traffic Proximity (daily traffic count/distance to road) Lead Paint (% Pre-1960 Housing) Superfund Proximity (site count/km distance) *Diesel particular matter, air toxics cancer risk, and air toxics respiratory hazard index are from the EPA’s 2017 Air Toxics Data Update, which is the Agency’s ongoing, comprehensive evaluation of air toxics in the United States. This effort aims to prioritize air toxics, emission sources, and locations of interest for further study. It is important to remember that the air toxics data presented here provide broad estimates of health risks over geographic areas of the country, not definitive risks to specific individuals or locations. Cancer risks and hazard indices from the Air Toxics Data Update are reported to one significant figure and any additional significant figures here are due to rounding. More information on the Air Toxics Data Update can be found at: https://www.epa.gov/haps/air- toxics-data-update. For additional information, see: www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice Socioeconomic Indicators Linguistically Isolated Underground Storage Tanks (count/km2) 1 mile Ring around the Area, MASSACHUSETTS, EPA Region 1 Approximate Population: 14,700 1 mile Buffer August 09, 2022 Input Area (sq. miles): 3.47 (Version 2.0) 39.7 6.57 0.287 0.0003 6 0.66 0.23 0.81 3600 0.3 20 32% 31% 17% 5% 11% 6% 34% 39.5 6.78 0.295 0.21 5.2 0.7 0.17 0.49 2100 0.3 24 25% 28% 22% 6% 9% 5% 16% 24% 25% 23% 5% 9% 5% 17% 36% 40% 31% 5% 12% 6% 16% 39.8 6.68 0.227 0.4 3.8 0.6 0.15 0.44 1300 0.28 23 42.6 8.74 0.295 12 2.2 0.75 0.13 0.28 710 0.36 29 62 39 62 39 78 67 84 84 85 81 56 71 65 77 69 68 55 60 75 71 75 75 70 57 55 53 49 60 74 56 45 63 51 44 70-80th 43 83 71 85 89 91 90-95th 60-70th 30 8 60-70th 39 90 66 88 93 96 <50th <50th 6%5% 66 5% 65 5%61 3.2 3.1 3 3.96770 68 Appendix I Site Plans Leefort Terrace Salem, MA Zoning Board of Appeals Issue date July 27, 2022 PROJECT TEAM: LOCUS MAP:PLOTTED ON:ISSUE DATE: OWNER/DEVELOPER: BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES 2 CENTER PLAZA, SUITE 700, BOSTON, MA 02108 SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY 27 CHARTER STREET, SALEM MA 01970 ARCHITECT: ICON ARCHITECTURE 101 SUMMER STREET BOSTON, MA 02110 617-451-3333 CIVIL ENGINEER: BOHLER ENGINEERING 45 FRANKLIN STREET, 5TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02110 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BSC GROUP 803 SUMMER STREET BOSTON, MA 02127 MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER: STAENGL ENGINEERING 1747 ALLIED ST., SUITE L CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA, 22903 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: McPHAIL ASSOCIATES LLC 2269 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE CAMBRIDGE, MA 02140 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS: LEC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 380 LOWELL STREET, SUITE 101 WAKEFIELD, MA 01880 LIFE SAFETY CONSULTANT: SLS FIRE 31 ST. JAMES AVENUE, 6TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02116 7/20/2022 4:21:32 PMLEEFORT TERRACE 07/27/2022 BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SALEM, MA DRAWING LIST SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME GENERAL G-000 COVER SHEET G-002 PROJECT DATA & UNIT MATRIX SURVEY SHEET 1 OF 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHEET 1 OF 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN CIVIL C-102 GENERAL NOTES SHEET C-301 OVERALL SITE PLAN C-401 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C-501 UTILITY PLAN C-601 SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C-602 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS C-901 DETAIL SHEET C-901. DETAIL SHEET LANDSCAPE L-100 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE DRAWING LIST L-102 LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES L-201 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN L-202 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN L-301 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN AND DETAILS L-401 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L-402 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L-501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L-502 PLANTING DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A-101 GARAGE & LEVEL 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A-102 LEVEL 2 & 3 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A-103 LEVEL 4 & ROOF OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A-200 OVERALL ELEVATIONS A-201 OVERALL COURTYARD ELEVATIONS A-301 BUILDING SECTIONS A-401 FLOOR, ROOF and WALL ASSEMBLIES A-501 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 1BR A-502 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 1BR/2BR GROUP 2 A-503 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 2BR A-504 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 2BR A-505 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 3BR A-506 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 3BR A-507 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 3BR GROUP 2 A-510 KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONS A-513 BATH PLANS & ELEVATIONS A-514 BATH PLANS & ELEVATIONS A-950 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING - SZETELA LANE A-951 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING - COURTYARD A-952 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING FROM FORT AVE. A-953 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING - FROM SCHOOL ON SZETELA LANE ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:33 PMG-002 PROJECT DATA & UNIT MATRIX LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 5/3/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 7/12/2022 SALEM CON COM SET FELDMANGEOSPATIAL Z FELDMANFELDMANGEOSPATIAL GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES1.THIS PLAN REFERENCES DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION BY:·EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN, BY FELDMAN, DATED 12/17/2020, REVISED THROUGH 03/25/2022.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970, (29 U.S.C.651 et seq.), AS AMENDED AND ANY MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS TO SAME.3.BOHLER ENGINEERING HAS NO CONTRACTUAL, LEGAL, OR OTHER RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE SAFETY OR JOB SITE SUPERVISION, OR ANYTHINGRELATED TO SAME.4.THE DEMOLITION PLAN IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION, ONLY, REGARDING ITEMS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND/OR REMOVED. THECONTRACTOR MUST ALSO REVIEW THE OTHER SITE PLAN DRAWINGS AND INCLUDE IN DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES ALL INCIDENTAL WORK NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SITE IMPROVEMENTS.5.CONTRACTOR MUST RAISE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE ACCURACY OR INTENT OF THESE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, CONCERNS REGARDING THEAPPLICABLE SAFETY STANDARDS, OR THE SAFETY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR THIRD PARTIES IN PERFORMING THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT, WITH BOHLERENGINEERING, IN WRITING, AND RESPONDED TO BY BOHLER, IN WRITING, PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF ANY SITE ACTIVITY AND ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY.ALL DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ALLAPPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS, RULES, REQUIREMENTS, STATUTES, ORDINANCES AND CODES.6.PRIOR TO STARTING ANY DEMOLITION, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR/TO:A.OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND MAINTAINING THE SAME ON SITE FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WITHJURISDICTION THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT, SITE WORK, AND DEMOLITION WORK.B.NOTIFYING, AT A MINIMUM, THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, DESIGN ENGINEER, AND LOCAL SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OFWORK.C.INSTALLING THE REQUIRED SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO SITE DISTURBANCE.D.IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE STATE ONE-CALL DAMAGE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR UTILITY MARKOUT, INADVANCE OF ANY EXCAVATION.E.LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UTILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO GAS, WATER, ELECTRIC, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER,TELEPHONE, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC CABLE, ETC. WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE AND COMPLYWITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE UTILITY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM TO LOCATE ALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.F.PROTECTING AND MAINTAINING IN OPERATION, ALL ACTIVE UTILITIES AND SYSTEMS THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED DURING ALL DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES.G.ARRANGING FOR AND COORDINATING WITH THE APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER(S) FOR THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT TERMINATION OFSERVICE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE THE UTILITY ENGINEER AND OWNER WRITTENNOTIFICATION THAT THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES HAVE BEEN TERMINATED AND ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH JURISDICTIONAL ANDUTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS.H.COORDINATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING WORKING "OFF-PEAK" HOURS OR ON WEEKENDS AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ONTHE AFFECTED PARTIES. WORK REQUIRED TO BE DONE "OFF-PEAK" IS TO BE DONE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.I.IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, THE REMOVAL OF WHICH IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE PROJECT PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL WORK AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF THE DISCOVERY OFSUCH MATERIALS.7.THE FIRM OR ENGINEER OF RECORD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SITE SAFETY OR SUPERVISION. CONTRACTOR MUST PROCEED WITH THE DEMOLITIONIN A SYSTEMATIC AND SAFE MANNER, FOLLOWING ALL THE OSHA REQUIREMENTS, TO ENSURE PUBLIC AND CONTRACTOR SAFETY.8.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE ALL “MEANS AND METHODS" NECESSARY TO PREVENT MOVEMENT, SETTLEMENT, OR COLLAPSE OF EXISTINGSTRUCTURES, AND ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE REMAINING ON OR OFF SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REPAIRS OF DAMAGETO ALL ITEMS THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR MUST USE NEW MATERIAL FOR ALL REPAIRS. CONTRACTOR'S REPAIR MUST INCLUDE THERESTORATION OF ANY ITEMS REPAIRED TO THE PRE-DEMOLITION CONDITION, OR BETTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL REPAIRS AT THECONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE.9.THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT PERFORM ANY EARTH MOVEMENT ACTIVITIES, DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL OF FOUNDATION WALLS, FOOTINGS, OR OTHERMATERIALS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE UNLESS SAME IS IN STRICT ACCORDANCE AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS, AND/OR UNDER THE WRITTEN DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S STRUCTURAL OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.10.CONTRACTOR MUST BACKFILL ALL EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM, OR INCIDENTAL TO, DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. BACKFILL MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHAPPROVED BACKFILL MATERIALS, AND MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY COMPACTED TO SUPPORT NEW IMPROVEMENTS AND PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE WITHTHE RECOMMENDATIONS AND GUIDANCE IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. BACKFILLING MUST OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES, ANDMUST BE DONE SO AS TO PREVENT WATER ENTERING THE EXCAVATION. FINISHED SURFACES MUST BE GRADED TO PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.11.EXPLOSIVES MUST NOT BE USED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BOTH THE OWNER AND ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. ALL THEREQUIRED PERMITS AND EXPLOSIVE CONTROL MEASURES THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MUST BE IN PLACEPRIOR TO CONTRACTOR STARTING AN EXPLOSIVE PROGRAM AND/OR ANY DEMOLITION. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONAND SEISMIC VIBRATION TESTING THAT IS REQUIRED TO MONITOR THE EFFECTS ON ALL LOCAL STRUCTURES.12.CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED SAFE PRACTICES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT FHWA "MANUAL ONUNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MUTCD), AND THE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS WHEN DEMOLITION RELATED ACTIVITIES IMPACTROADWAYS AND/OR ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.13.CONTRACTOR MUST CONDUCT DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES IN SUCH A MANNER TO ENSURE MINIMUM INTERFERENCE WITH ROADS, STREETS, SIDEWALKS,WALKWAYS, AND OTHER ADJACENT FACILITIES. STREET CLOSURE PERMITS MUST BE RECEIVED FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITYPRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY ROAD OPENING OR DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES IN OR ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.14.DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES AND EQUIPMENT MUST NOT USE AREAS OUTSIDE THE DEFINED PROJECT LIMIT LINE, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THEOWNER AND ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION.15.THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE DUST CONTROL MEASURES TO LIMIT AIRBORNE DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR IN ACCORDANCE WITHFEDERAL, STATE, AND/OR LOCAL STANDARDS. AFTER THE DEMOLITION IS COMPLETE, CONTRACTOR MUST CLEAN ALL ADJACENT STRUCTURES ANDIMPROVEMENTS TO REMOVE ALL DUST AND DEBRIS CAUSED BY THE DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RETURNING ALLADJACENT AREAS TO THEIR "PRE-DEMOLITION" CONDITION.16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SAFEGUARD THE SITE AS NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE DEMOLITION IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT THE ENTRYOF UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS AT ANY TIME.17.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE JOB SAFETY, WHICH MUST INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OFBARRIERS, FENCING AND OTHER APPROPRIATE SAFETY ITEMS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION ANDCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.18.THIS DEMOLITION PLAN IS INTENDED TO IDENTIFY THOSE EXISTING ITEMS/CONDITIONS WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDEDIRECTION AS TO THE MEANS, METHODS, SEQUENCING, TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES TO BE USED TO ACCOMPLISH THAT WORK. ALL MEANS,METHODS, SEQUENCING, TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES TO BE USED MUST BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE, FEDERAL, LOCAL, ANDJURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA AND OTHER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SAFEWORK SITE.19.DEBRIS MUST NOT BE BURIED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. ALL DEMOLITION WASTES AND DEBRIS (SOLID WASTE) MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITHALL MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS AND APPLICABLE CODES. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN RECORDS TO DEMONSTRATE PROPERDISPOSAL ACTIVITIES, TO BE PROMPTLY PROVIDED TO THE OWNER UPON REQUEST.20.CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN A RECORD SET OF PLANS UPON WHICH IS INDICATED THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES THAT ARE CAPPED, ABANDONEDIN PLACE, OR RELOCATED DUE TO DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. THIS RECORD DOCUMENT MUST BE PREPARED IN A NEAT AND WORKMAN-LIKE MANNER, ANDTURNED OVER TO THE OWNER/DEVELOPER UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK.GENERAL NOTESCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THATALL SUBCONTRACTORS FULLY AND COMPLETELY CONFORM TO AND COMPLY WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS.1.THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AS PART OF THIS SITE PLAN:·EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN, BY FELDMAN, DATED 12/17/2020, REVISED THROUGH 03/25/2022.·ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FROM ICON, DATED 06/21/2022.·LANDSCAPE PLANS FROM BSC GROUP, DATED 06/24/2022.·GEOTECHNICAL MEMO BY MCPHAIL ASSOCIATES, DATED 11/06/2020.PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THAT HE/SHE HAS THE LATEST EDITION OF THE DOCUMENTS REFERENCEDABOVE. THIS IS CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY.2.ALL ACCESSIBLE (A/K/A ADA) PARKING SPACES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO MEET, AT A MINIMUM, THE MORE STRINGENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE“AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT” (ADA) CODE (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. AND 42 U.S.C. § 4151 et seq.) OR THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE JURISDICTION WHERETHE PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED, AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS TO BOTH WHICH ARE IN EFFECT WHEN THESE PLANS ARE COMPLETED.3.PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED.NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED THE COMMENTS TO ALL PLANSAND OTHER DOCUMENTS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES AND CONFIRMED THAT ALL NECESSARY OR REQUIRED PERMITSHAVE BEEN OBTAINED. CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE COPIES OF ALL PERMITS AND APPROVALS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.4.THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR MUST BE FAMILIAR WITH AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF ANY AND ALL CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR THEISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.5.ALL WORK MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, AND ALL APPLICABLEREQUIREMENTS, RULES, REGULATIONS, STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS, CODES, LAWS AND STANDARDS OF ALL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES WITH JURISDICTIONOVER THIS PROJECT.6.THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH HEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND, IN CASE OFCONFLICT, DISCREPANCY OR AMBIGUITY, THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANS AND THEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTORMUST NOTIFY THE ENGINEER, IN WRITING, OF ANY SUCH CONFLICT, DISCREPANCY OR AMBIGUITY BETWEEN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS AND PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK.7.THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO BOHLER ENGINEERING BY THE OWNER AND OTHERS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF PLAN PREPARATION.CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY BOHLER ENGINEERING, IN WRITING, IMMEDIATELY IF ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS DIFFERFROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, OR IF THE PROPOSED WORK CONFLICTS WITH ANY OTHER SITE FEATURES.8.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR MUSTNOTIFY ENGINEER, IN WRITING, IF ANY CONFLICTS, DISCREPANCIES, OR AMBIGUITIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. NO EXTRACOMPENSATION WILL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK WHICH HAS TO BE REDONE OR REPAIRED DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWNINCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR GIVING ENGINEER WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF SAME AND ENGINEER, THEREAFTER, PROVIDINGCONTRACTOR WITH WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH SUCH ADDITIONAL WORK.9.CONTRACTOR MUST REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING PLANS “OF RECORD” FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ENTRY/EXIT POINTS,ELEVATIONS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY LOCATIONS.10.PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE THE BUILDING LAYOUT BY CAREFUL REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE SITE PLAN ANDTHE LATEST ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND FIRE SUPPRESSION PLAN,WHERE APPLICABLE). CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER, ARCHITECT AND SITE ENGINEER, IN WRITING, OF ANY CONFLICTS, DISCREPANCIESOR AMBIGUITIES WHICH EXIST.11.DEBRIS MUST NOT BE BURIED ON THE SUBJECT SITE AND ALL UNSUITABLE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND DEBRIS (SOLID WASTE) MUST BE DISPOSED OF INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANY AND ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES WHICH HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROJECT OR OVERCONTRACTOR.12.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING WHEN SHORING IS REQUIRED AND FOR INSTALLING ALL SHORING REQUIRED DURING EXCAVATION (TOBE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT OSHA STANDARDS) AND ANY ADDITIONAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN TO ASSURE THE STABILITY OFADJACENT, NEARBY AND CONTIGUOUS STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES.13.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO EXERCISE EXTREME CARE WHEN PERFORMING ANY WORK ACTIVITIES ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT, STRUCTURES, ETC. WHICH ARE TOREMAIN EITHER FOR AN INITIAL PHASE OF THE PROJECT OR AS PART OF THE FINAL CONDITION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TAKING ALLAPPROPRIATE MEASURES REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF SIDEWALKS AND PAVEMENT, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS, AND INFRASTRUCTUREWHICH ARE TO REMAIN, AND TO PROVIDE A SAFE WORK AREA FOR THIRD PARTIES, PEDESTRIANS AND ANYONE INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT.14.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE DONE TO ANY NEW OR EXISTING CONSTRUCTION OR PROPERTY DURING THE COURSE OFCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. AND SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITHSAME TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, REDESIGN, RE-SURVEY, RE-PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANDMUST REPLACE ALL SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION CABLE, WIRING CONDUITS, AND ANY UNDERGROUND ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND MUST BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SAME. THE REPAIR OF ANY SUCH NEW OR EXISTING CONSTRUCTION OR PROPERTY MUSTRESTORE SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR PROPERTY TO A CONDITION EQUIVALENT TO OR BETTER THAN THE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THECONSTRUCTION, AND IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, LAWS RULES, REGULATIONS, STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND STATUTES. CONTRACTORMUST BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SAME. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND TO NOTIFY THE OWNER ANDTHE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.15.ALL CONCRETE MUST BE AIR ENTRAINED AND HAVE THE MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THEPLANS, DETAILS AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.16.THE ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION METHODS, MEANS, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES, GENERALLY OR FOR THE CONSTRUCTIONMEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK DEPICTED BOTH ON THESE PLANS, AND FOR ANY CONFLICTS/SCOPEREVISIONS WHICH RESULT FROM SAME. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE METHODS/MEANS FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK PRIORTO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.17.THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SITE SAFETY. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD HAS NOT BEEN RETAINED TO PERFORM OR BERESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SITE SAFETY, SAME BEING WHOLLY OUTSIDE OF ENGINEER'S SERVICES AS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ISNOT RESPONSIBLE TO IDENTIFY OR REPORT ANY JOB SITE SAFETY ISSUES, AT ANY TIME.18.ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CARRY THE SPECIFIED STATUTORY WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE, EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY INSURANCE AND LIMITS OFCOMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE (CGL). ALL CONTRACTORS MUST HAVE THEIR CGL POLICIES ENDORSED TO NAME BOHLER ENGINEERING, ANDITS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, SHAREHOLDERS, MEMBERS, PRINCIPALS, COMMISSIONERS, AGENTS,SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, AFFILIATES, SUBSIDIARIES, AND RELATED ENTITIES, AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUBCONSULTANTS AS ADDITIONAL NAMEDINSURED AND TO PROVIDE CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY COVERAGE SUFFICIENT TO INSURE THIS HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY OBLIGATIONS ASSUMED BYTHE CONTRACTORS. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST FURNISH BOHLER ENGINEERING WITH CERTIFICATIONS OF INSURANCE AS EVIDENCE OF THE REQUIREDINSURANCE PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND UPON RENEWAL OF EACH POLICY DURING THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION AND FOR ONE YEARAFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. IN ADDITION, ALL CONTRACTORS WILL, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER THE LAW, INDEMNIFY,DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS BOHLER ENGINEERING AND ITS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, SHAREHOLDERS,MEMBERS, PRINCIPALS, COMMISSIONERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, AFFILIATES, SUBSIDIARIES, AND RELATED ENTITIES, AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORSAND SUBCONSULTANTS FROM AND AGAINST ANY DAMAGES, INJURIES, CLAIMS, ACTIONS, PENALTIES, EXPENSES, PUNITIVE DAMAGES, TORT DAMAGES,STATUTORY CLAIMS, STATUTORY CAUSES OF ACTION, LOSSES, CAUSES OF ACTION, LIABILITIES OR COSTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, REASONABLEATTORNEYS' FEES AND DEFENSE COSTS, ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH OR TO THE PROJECT, INCLUDING ALL CLAIMS BY EMPLOYEESOF THE CONTRACTORS, ALL CLAIMS BY THIRD PARTIES AND ALL CLAIMS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ENGINEER, IN WRITING, ATLEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY TERMINATION, SUSPENSION OR CHANGE OF ITS INSURANCE HEREUNDER.19.BOHLER ENGINEERING WILL REVIEW OR TAKE OTHER APPROPRIATE ACTION ON THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS, SUCH AS SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT DATA,SAMPLES, AND OTHER DATA, WHICH THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT, BUT ONLY FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF CHECKING FOR CONFORMANCEWITH THE DESIGN INTENT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND/OR METHODSAND/OR TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES, COORDINATION OF THE WORK WITH OTHER TRADES, AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ARE THE SOLERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BOHLER HAS NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR SAME HEREUNDER. BOHLER ENGINEERING'S SHOPDRAWING REVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED WITH REASONABLE PROMPTNESS WHILE ALLOWING SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT ADEQUATE REVIEW. REVIEW OF ASPECIFIC ITEM MUST NOT INDICATE THAT BOHLER ENGINEERING HAS REVIEWED THE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY OF WHICH THE ITEM IS A COMPONENT. BOHLERENGINEERING WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NOT PROMPTLY AND IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TOITS ATTENTION, IN WRITING, BY THE CONTRACTOR. BOHLER ENGINEERING WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO REVIEW PARTIAL SUBMISSIONS OR THOSE FOR WHICHSUBMISSIONS OF CORRELATED ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED.20.NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF BOHLER ENGINEERING, NOR THE PRESENCE OF BOHLER ENGINEERING AND/OR ITS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTUREOWNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, SHAREHOLDERS, MEMBERS, PRINCIPALS, COMMISSIONERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, AFFILIATES,SUBSIDIARIES, AND RELATED ENTITIES, AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUBCONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT SITE, SHALL RELIEVE THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ITS OBLIGATIONS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS,SEQUENCE, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, OVERSEEING, SUPERINTENDING AND COORDINATING THE WORK INACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORYAGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE PROJECT AND/OR PROPERTY. BOHLER ENGINEERING AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANYCONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PROGRAMS ORPROCEDURES. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SITE SAFETY. BOHLER ENGINEERING SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED BY THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MUST BE NAMED AN ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S POLICIES OF GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCEAS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN NOTE 19 FOR JOB SITE SAFETY.21.IF THE CONTRACTOR DEVIATES FROM THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING THE NOTES CONTAINED HEREIN, WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE PRIORWRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE ENGINEER FOR SUCH DEVIATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALL COSTSINCURRED IN CORRECTING ANY WORK DONE WHICH DEVIATES FROM THE PLANS, ALL FINES AND/OR PENALTIES ASSESSED WITH RESPECT THERETO ANDALL COMPENSATORY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES RESULTING THEREFROM AND, FURTHER, SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE ENGINEER, TOTHE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER THE LAW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 19 HEREIN, FOR AND FROM ALL FEES, ATTORNEYS' FEES, DAMAGES,COSTS, JUDGMENTS, PENALTIES AND THE LIKE RELATED TO SAME.22.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC PLAN FOR ALL WORK THAT AFFECTS PUBLIC TRAVEL EITHER IN THE R.O.W.OR ON SITE. THE COST FOR THIS ITEM MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S PRICE.23.ALL SIGNING AND PAVEMENT STRIPING MUST CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR LOCALLY APPROVED SUPPLEMENT.24.ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INJURY OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO BUILD OR CONSTRUCT IN STRICTACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. IF CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER FAIL TO BUILD OR CONSTRUCT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVEDPLANS, THEY AGREE TO JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY INDEMNIFY AND HOLD ENGINEER HARMLESS FOR ALL INJURIES AND DAMAGES THAT ENGINEER SUFFERSAND COSTS THAT ENGINEER INCURS.25.OWNER MUST MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES AND DESIGN FEATURES DEPICTED ON THE PLANS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS, INSTRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN(S) AND DESIGN AND, FURTHER ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FAILURE TO SO MAINTAIN ORPRESERVE SITE AND/OR DESIGN FEATURES. IF OWNER FAILS TO MAINTAIN AND/OR PRESERVE ALL PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES AND/OR DESIGN FEATURESDEPICTED ON THE PLANS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS, OWNER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD ENGINEER HARMLESS FOR ALL INJURIES AND DAMAGESTHAT ENGINEER SUFFERS AND COSTS THAT ENGINEER INCURS AS A RESULT OF SAID FAILURE.26.ALL DIMENSIONS MUST BE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT, OR EDGE OF BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.27.ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS MUST COMPLY WITH AND CONFORM TO APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS, LAWS, ORDINANCES,RULES AND CODES, AND ALL APPLICABLE OSHA REQUIREMENTS.28.CONTRACTOR AND OWNER MUST INSTALL ALL ELEMENTS AND COMPONENTS IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH AND ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'SSTANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED INSTALLATION CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER FAIL TO DO SO, THEY AGREE TO JOINTLYAND SEVERALLY INDEMNIFY AND HOLD ENGINEER HARMLESS FOR ALL INJURIES AND DAMAGES THAT ENGINEER SUFFERS AND COSTS THAT ENGINEERINCURS AS A RESULT OF SAID FAILURE.29.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN ON-SITE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IN COMPLIANCE WITH EPA REQUIREMENTS FORSITES WHERE ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE (UNLESS THE LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIRES FEWER) IS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT ALL ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING THOSE OF SUBCONTRACTORS, ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SWPPP, INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO LOGGING ACTIVITIES (MINIMUM ONCE PER WEEK AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS) AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES, AS APPROPRIATE.30.AS CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS AND ASSOCIATED APPLICATION DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE SIGNATORY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, THE USE OFTHE WORDS CERTIFY OR CERTIFICATION CONSTITUTES AN EXPRESSION OF “PROFESSIONAL OPINION” REGARDING THE INFORMATION WHICH IS THESUBJECT OF THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL'S KNOWLEDGE OR BELIEF AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMMON ACCEPTED PROCEDURE CONSISTENT WITHTHE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.GENERAL GRADING & UTILITY PLAN NOTES1.LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SERVICES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIESPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION. SANITARY SEWER AND ALL OTHER UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION POINTS MUST BEINDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL DISCREPANCIES MUSTIMMEDIATELY BE REPORTED, IN WRITING, TO THE ENGINEER. CONSTRUCTION MUST COMMENCE BEGINNING AT THE LOWEST INVERT (POINT OFCONNECTION) AND PROGRESS UP GRADIENT. PROPOSED INTERFACE POINTS (CROSSINGS) WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE FIELDVERIFIED BY TEST PIT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.2.CONTRACTOR MUST VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY LOCATE ALL UTILITIES AND SERVICES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GAS, WATER, ELECTRIC,SANITARY AND STORM SEWER, TELEPHONE, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC CABLE, ETC. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE OR WORK SPACE, WHICHEVER ISGREATER. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE, REFER TO, AND COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE UTILITY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM TOLOCATE ALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ALL DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING UTILITIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION, AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING UTILITIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION.3.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL OF THEDRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT WORK SCOPE PRIOR TO THE INITIATION AND COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR FIND A CONFLICT AND/OR DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OR THE RELATIVE ORAPPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, LAWS, RULES, STATUTES AND/OR ORDINANCES, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THEPROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD, IN WRITING, OF SAID CONFLICT AND/OR DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR'SFAILURE TO NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL CONSTITUTE CONTRACTOR'S FULL AND COMPLETE ACCEPTANCE OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY TOCOMPLETE THE SCOPE OF WORK AS DEFINED BY THE DRAWINGS AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS, LAWS,STATUTES, ORDINANCES AND CODES AND, FURTHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SAME.4.THE CONTRACTOR MUST LOCATE AND CLEARLY AND UNAMBIGUOUSLY DEFINE VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY ALL ACTIVE AND INACTIVE UTILITYAND/OR SERVICE SYSTEMS THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT AND MAINTAIN ALL ACTIVE AND INACTIVESYSTEMS THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED/RELOCATED DURING SITE ACTIVITY.5.THE CONTRACTOR MUST FAMILIARIZE ITSELF WITH THE APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER REQUIREMENTS AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLCOORDINATION REGARDING UTILITY DEMOLITION AS IDENTIFIED OR REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE THE OWNER WITHWRITTEN NOTIFICATION THAT THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES HAVE BEEN TERMINATED AND ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEJURISDICTION AND UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS, RULES, STATUTES, LAWS, ORDINANCES AND CODES.6.THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL ALL STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER COMPONENTS WHICH FUNCTION BY GRAVITY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATIONOF ALL OTHER UTILITIES.7.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF SITE PLAN DOCUMENTS AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTIONLOCATIONS, GREASE TRAP REQUIREMENTS/DETAILS, DOOR ACCESS, AND EXTERIOR GRADING. THE ARCHITECT WILL DETERMINE THE UTILITY SERVICESIZES. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES/SERVICES WITH THE INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES, TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND TOENSURE THAT PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT INSTALLATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTSCOMPLIES WITH ALL UTILITY REQUIREMENTS WITH JURISDICTION AND/OR CONTROL OF THE SITE, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS, RULES,STATUTES, LAWS, ORDINANCES AND CODES AND, FURTHER, IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE UTILITY TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS PRIOR TOCONNECTING TO THE EXISTING UTILITY/SERVICE. WHERE A CONFLICT(S) EXISTS BETWEEN THESE SITE PLANS AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, ORWHERE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN UTILITY CONNECTION POINTS DIFFER, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER, IN WRITING, ANDPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, RESOLVE SAME.8.WATER SERVICE MATERIALS, BURIAL DEPTH, AND COVER REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SPECIFIED BY THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY. CONTRACTOR'S PRICEFOR WATER SERVICE MUST INCLUDE ALL FEES, COSTS AND APPURTENANCES REQUIRED BY THE UTILITY TO PROVIDE FULL AND COMPLETE WORKINGSERVICE. CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPLICABLE MUNICIPALITY TO CONFIRM THE PROPER WATER METER AND VAULT, PRIOR TO COMMENCINGCONSTRUCTION.9.ALL NEW UTILITIES/SERVICES, INCLUDING ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, CABLE TV, ETC. ARE TO BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. ALL NEW UTILITIES/SERVICESMUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY/SERVICE PROVIDER INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS.10.SITE GRADING MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT REFERENCED IN THIS PLAN SET. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING UNSUITABLE MATERIALSWITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. ALL EXCAVATED OR FILLED AREAS MUST BE COMPACTED AS OUTLINED IN THEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT. MOISTURE CONTENT AT TIME OF PLACEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED IN A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIEDGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED WITH THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREASWITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AREA AND AREAS TO BE PAVED HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND THERECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS, RULES, STATUTES, LAWS, ORDINANCES ANDCODES. SUBBASE MATERIAL FOR SIDEWALKS, CURB, OR ASPHALT MUST BE FREE OF ORGANICS AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS. SHOULD SUBBASEBE DEEMED UNSUITABLE BY OWNER/DEVELOPER, OR OWNER/DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE, SUBBASE IS TO BE REMOVED AND FILLED WITH APPROVEDFILL MATERIAL COMPACTED AS DIRECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXCAVATION,BACKFILL, AND COMPACTING MUST COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS, RULES,STATUTES, LAWS, ORDINANCES AND CODES. EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES MUST COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADWAYCONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION) AND ANY AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS THERETO.11.ALL FILL, COMPACTION, AND BACKFILL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION MUST BE AS PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN THEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. WHEN THE PROJECT DOES NOT HAVEGEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS, FILL AND COMPACTION MUST, AT A MINIMUM, COMPLY WITH THE STATE DOT REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONSAND CONSULTANT SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR OR AS RELATED TO FILL, COMPACTION AND BACKFILL. FURTHER, CONTRACTOR ISFULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR EARTHWORK BALANCE.12.THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT, WITH THE LATEST OSHA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS, AND/OR ANY OTHER AGENCY WITHJURISDICTION FOR EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING PROCEDURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE “MEANS AND METHODS”REQUIRED TO MEET THE INTENT AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF OSHA, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER ENTITY THAT HAS JURISDICTION FOR EXCAVATIONAND/OR TRENCHING PROCEDURES AND CONSULTANT SHALL HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR OR AS RELATED FOR OR AS RELATED TO EXCAVATION ANDTRENCHING PROCEDURES.13.PAVEMENT MUST BE SAW CUT IN STRAIGHT LINES, AND EXCEPT FOR EDGE OF BUTT JOINTS, MUST EXTEND TO THE FULL DEPTH OF THE EXISTINGPAVEMENT. ALL DEBRIS FROM REMOVAL OPERATIONS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF EXCAVATION. STOCKPILING OF DEBRIS WILLNOT BE PERMITTED.14.THE TOPS OF EXISTING MANHOLES, INLET STRUCTURES, AND SANITARY CLEANOUT TOPS MUST BE ADJUSTED, AS NECESSARY, TO MATCH PROPOSEDGRADES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS, REQUIREMENTS, RULES, STATUTES, LAWS, ORDINANCES AND CODES.15.DURING THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND ALL UTILITIES, THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN A CONTEMPORANEOUS ANDTHOROUGH RECORD OF CONSTRUCTION TO IDENTIFY THE AS-INSTALLED LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE. THE CONTRACTOR MUSTCAREFULLY NOTE ANY INSTALLATIONS THAT DEVIATE FROM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE UTILITY PLAN. THIS RECORD MUST BE KEPT ON ACLEAN COPY OF THE DRAINAGE OR UTILITY PLAN, WHICH CONTRACTOR MUST PROMPTLY PROVIDE TO THE OWNER AT THE COMPLETION OF WORK.16.WHEN THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS INVOLVE MULTIPLE BUILDINGS, SOME OF WHICH MAY BE BUILT AT A LATER DATE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST EXTENDALL LINES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, UTILITIES, AND IRRIGATION LINE, TO A POINT AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEETBEYOND THE PAVED AREAS FOR WHICH THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE. CONTRACTOR MUST CAP ENDS AS APPROPRIATE, MARK LOCATIONS WITH A2X4, AND MUST NOTE THE LOCATION OF ALL OF THE ABOVE ON A CLEAN COPY OF THE DRAINAGE OR UTILITY PLAN, WHICH CONTRACTOR MUSTPROMPTLY PROVIDE TO THE OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK.17.THE CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND UTILITY INVERT ELEVATIONS PRIOR TOCOMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR MUST CONFIRM AND ENSURE 0.75% MINIMUM SLOPE AGAINST ALL ISLANDS, GUTTERS, AND CURBS;1.0% ON ALL CONCRETE SURFACES; AND 1.5% MINIMUM ON ASPHALT (EXCEPT WHERE ADA REQUIREMENTS OR EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY LIMIT GRADES), TOPREVENT PONDING. CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFY, IN WRITING TO THE ENGINEER, ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY OR COULD AFFECT THEPUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH OR GENERAL WELFARE, OR PROJECT COST. IF CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PROVIDING PROPERNOTIFICATION, MUST BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN RISK AND, FURTHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE DESIGNENGINEER FOR ANY DAMAGES, COSTS, INJURIES, ATTORNEY'S FEES AND THE LIKE WHICH RESULT FROM SAME.18.PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE GENERALLY 6” ABOVE EXISTING LOCAL ASPHALT GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FIELD ADJUST TOCREATE A MINIMUM OF 0.75% GUTTER GRADE ALONG CURB FACE. IT IS CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATION TO ENSURE THAT DESIGN ENGINEER APPROVESFINAL CURBING CUT SHEETS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SAME.19.IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES AND/OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN PLANS OR RELATIVE TO OTHER PLANS, THE SITE PLAN WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE ANDCONTROL. CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER, IN WRITING, OF ANY DISCREPANCIES AND/OR CONFLICTS.20.CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR ALL OFF SITE MATERIAL SOURCES ANDDISPOSAL FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR MUST SUPPLY A COPY OF APPROVALS TO ENGINEER AND OWNER PRIOR TO INITIATING ANY WORK.21.WHERE RETAINING WALLS (WHETHER OR NOT THEY MEET THE JURISDICTIONAL DEFINITION) ARE IDENTIFIED ON PLANS, ELEVATIONS IDENTIFIED ARE FORTHE EXPOSED PORTION OF THE WALL. WALL FOOTINGS/FOUNDATION ELEVATIONS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED HEREIN AND ARE TO BE SET/DETERMINED BY THECONTRACTOR BASED ON FINAL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHOP DRAWINGS PREPARED BY THE APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL LICENSED IN THE STATE WHERETHE CONSTRUCTION OCCURS.22.STORM DRAINAGE PIPE:UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, ALL STORM SEWER PIPE MUST BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) CLASS III WITH SILT TIGHTJOINTS. WHEN HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) IS CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS, IT MUST CONFORM TO AASHTO M294 AND TYPE S (SMOOTHINTERIOR WITH ANGULAR CORRUGATIONS) WITH GASKET FOR SILT TIGHT JOINT. PVC PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION MUST BE SDR 26 OR SCHEDULE40 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.23.UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS, SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:·FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12 FT. DEEP: POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 PER ASTM D3034·FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12 FT. DEEP: POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 26 PER ASTM D3034·FOR PIPE WITHIN 10 FT. OF BUILDING, PIPE MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING AND PLUMBING CODES. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS.25.STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PIPE LENGTHS INDICATED ARE NOMINAL AND MEASURED CENTER OF INLET AND/OR MANHOLES STRUCTURE TO CENTER OFSTRUCTURE.26.STORMWATER ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO AND FOR VERIFYINGLOCATIONS OF SAME BASED ON FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.27.SEWERS CROSSING STREAMS AND/OR LOCATION WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE STREAM EMBANKMENT, OR WHERE SITE CONDITIONS SO INDICATE, MUST BECONSTRUCTED OF STEEL, REINFORCED CONCRETE, DUCTILE IRON OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL. SEWERS CONVEYING SANITARY FLOW COMBINEDSANITARY AND STORMWATER FLOW OR INDUSTRIAL FLOW MUST BE SEPARATED FROM WATER MAINS BY A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY. IF SUCH LATERAL SEPARATION IS NOT POSSIBLE, THE PIPES MUST BE IN SEPARATE TRENCHES WITH THE SEWER AT LEAST 18 INCHESBELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN, OR SUCH OTHER SEPARATION AS APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION OVER SAME.·WHERE APPROPRIATE SEPARATION FROM A WATER MAIN IS NOT POSSIBLE, THE SEWER MUST BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE, OR CONSTRUCTED OFDUCTILE IRON PIPE USING MECHANICAL OR SLIP-ON JOINTS FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CROSSING. INADDITION, ONE FULL LENGTH OF SEWER PIPE SHOULD BE LOCATED SO BOTH JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR FROM THE WATER LINE AS POSSIBLE. WHEREA WATER MAIN CROSSES UNDER A SEWER, ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE SEWER MUST BE PROVIDED.28.WATER MAIN PIPING MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR. IN THEABSENCE OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS, WATER MAIN PIPING MUST BE CEMENT-LINED DUCTILE IRON (DIP) MINIMUM CLASS 52 THICKNESS. ALL PIPE ANDAPPURTENANCES MUST COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE AWWA STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION.29.CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT ALL UTILITY TRENCHES LOCATED IN EXISTING PAVED ROADWAYS INCLUDING SEWER, WATER AND STORM SYSTEMS,MUST BE REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REFERENCED MUNICIPAL, COUNTY AND/OR DOT DETAILS AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATEINSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF COMPLETED WORK WITH THE AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION OVER SAME.30.LOCATION OF PROPOSED UTILITY POLE RELOCATION IS AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF UTILITY COMPANY.31.CONSULTANT IS NEITHER LIABLE NOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND FURTHER, SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY HAZARDOUSMATERIALS, HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, OR POLLUTANTS ON, ABOUT OR UNDER THE PROPERTY.EXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINESETBACKEASEMENTCURBSEWER MANHOLECATCH BASINWETLAND FLAGSPOT ELEVATIONTOP & BOTTOM OFCURBCONTOURFLOW ARROWPAINTED ARROWGAS LINETELEPHONE LINEELECTRIC LINEWATER LINEOVERHEAD WIRESTORM PIPESANITARY LINESIGNPARKING COUNTLIGHT POLEGUIDE RAILUTILITY POLEWETLAND LINESTORM MANHOLERIDGE LINEGGTTEEWWSS53.52TC=54.32BC=53.82REFER TO SOIL EROSION CONTROLNOTES & DETAILS SHEET FOR TYPICALEROSION NOTES AND DETAILS505%KEYDESCRIPTIONBCBOTTOM CURBTCTOP CURBEXIST.EXISTINGBM.BENCHMARKEOPEDGE OF PAVEMENTCCENTERLINEFFFINISHED FLOORV.I.F.VERIFY IN FIELDGCGENERAL CONTRACTORBWBOTTOM OF WALL GRADETWTOP OF WALLHPHIGH POINTLPLOW POINTTYP.TYPICALINT.INTERSECTIONPC.POINT OF CURVATUREPT.POINT OF TANGENCYPI.POINT OF INTERSECTIONPVI.POINT OF VERTICALINTERSECTIONSTA.STATIONGRTGRATEINV.INVERTDIPDUCTILE IRON PIPEPVCPOLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPEHDPEHIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENEPIPERCPREINFORCED CONCRETEPIPESSLOPEPROP.PROPOSEDTBRTO BE REMOVEDTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCEBLDG.BUILDINGSFSQUARE FEETDMHDRAIN MANHOLESTM.STORMSAN.SANITARYCONC.CONCRETEARCH.ARCHITECTURALDEP.DEPRESSEDMIN.MINIMUMMAX.MAXIMUMNo. / #NUMBERW.WIDEDEC.DECORATIVEELEV.ELEVATIONUNG.UNDERGROUNDR.O.W.RIGHT OF WAYLFLINEAR FOOTLODLIMIT OF DISTURBANCEL.S.A.LANDSCAPED AREA±PLUS OR MINUS°DEGREEØ / DIA.DIAMETERRRADIUSMEMEET EXISTINGLTBR/RTO BE REMOVEDAND REPLACEDSMHSEWER MANHOLELOWLIMIT OF WORKBOCBACK OF CURBKEYDESCRIPTIONSDADA INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR:CONTRACTORS MUST EXERCISE APPROPRIATE CARE AND PRECISION IN CONSTRUCTION OF ADA (ACCESSIBLE) ACCESSIBLE COMPONENTS AND ACCESSROUTES FOR THE SITE. THESE COMPONENTS, AS CONSTRUCTED, MUST COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ACCESSIBILITY LAWS ANDREGULATIONS AND THE CURRENT ADA AND/OR STATE ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS' BARRIER FREE ACCESS AND ANYMODIFICATIONS, REVISIONS OR UPDATES TO SAME. FINISHED SURFACES ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM PARKING SPACE, PUBLICTRANSPORTATION, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, INTER-BUILDING ACCESS, TO POINTS OF ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXIT, MUST COMPLY WITH THESE ADAAND/OR ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD CODE REQUIREMENTS. THESE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:·PARKING SPACES AND PARKING AISLES - SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:50 (1/4” PER FOOT OR NOMINALLY 2.0%) IN ANY DIRECTION.·CURB RAMPS - SLOPE MUST NOT EXCEED 1:12 (8.3%) FOR A MAXIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET.·LANDINGS - MUST BE PROVIDED AT EACH END OF RAMPS, MUST PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE, AND MUST NOT EXCEED 1:50 (1/4” PER FOOT OR NOMINALLY2.0%) IN ANY DIRECTION.·PATH OF TRAVEL ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTE - MUST PROVIDE A 36-INCH OR GREATER UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF TRAVEL (CAR OVERHANGS AND/ORHANDRAILS CANNOT REDUCE THIS MINIMUM WIDTH). THE SLOPE MUST BE NO GREATER THAN 1:20 (5.0%) IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, AND MUST NOTEXCEED 1:50 (1/4” PER FOOT OR NOMINALLY 2.0%) IN CROSS SLOPE. WHERE PATH OF TRAVEL WILL BE GREATER THAN 1:20 (5.0%), ADA RAMP MUST BEADHERED TO. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1:12 (8.3%), FOR A MAXIMUM RISE OF 2.5 FEET, MUST BE PROVIDED. THE RAMP MUST HAVE ADA HAND RAILS AND “LEVEL”LANDINGS ON EACH END THAT ARE CROSS SLOPED NO MORE THAN 1:50 IN ANY DIRECTION (1/4” PER FOOT OR NOMINALLY 2.0%) FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE.·DOORWAYS - MUST HAVE A “LEVEL” LANDING AREA ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE DOOR THAT IS SLOPED AWAY FROM THE DOOR NO MORE THAN 1:50 (1/4”PER FOOT OR NOMINALLY 2.0%) FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. THIS LANDING AREA MUST BE NO LESS THAN 60 INCHES (5 FEET) LONG, EXCEPT WHEREOTHERWISE PERMITTED BY ADA STANDARDS FOR ALTERNATIVE DOORWAY OPENING CONDITIONS. (SEE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 AND OTHER REFERENCEDINCORPORATED BY CODE.)·WHEN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION INVOLVES RECONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION, REVISION OR EXTENSION OF OR TO ADA COMPONENTS FROM EXISTINGDOORWAYS OR SURFACES, CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY EXISTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. NOTE THAT TABLE 405.2 OF THE DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE'S ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN ALLOWS FOR STEEPER RAMP SLOPES, IN RARE CIRCUMSTANCES. THE CONTRACTOR MUSTIMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES AND/OR FIELD CONDITIONS THAT DIFFER IN ANY WAY OR ANY RESPECT FROM WHAT ISSHOWN ON THE PLANS, IN WRITING, BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS MUST FALL WITHIN THE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUMLIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY THE BARRIER FREE REGULATIONS AND THE ADA REQUIREMENTS.·THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE SLOPES OF CONTRACTOR'S FORMS PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. IF ANY NON-CONFORMANCE IS OBSERVED OREXISTS, CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS TOREMOVE, REPAIR AND REPLACE NON-CONFORMING CONCRETE.IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR REVIEW THE INTENDED CONSTRUCTION WITH THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENTOF CONSTRUCTION.4TYPICAL ABBREVIATIONSTYPICAL LEGENDC-102GENERALNOTESSHEETARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SET Z NEW BIKE PATHTNEW BIKE PATH50.8 '78PROP. 5' ASPHALTWALK (TYP.)13.2 '20.0 'PROP. SNOWSTORAGE AREA (TYP.)PROP. SNOWSTORAGE AREA (TYP.)PROP. SNOWSTORAGE AREA (TYP.)1 6 . 0 '5.0'21.6'53.1'11.7'29.3 '171.6'20.3 '25.1'PROP. LOADING/DROPOFFZONE (TYP.)5.0'3.0 ' R 120.0'R30.0'R3.0'R120.0'R 15 . 0 ' R 15.0'R144.0'R 144.0'R144.0'R5.0'R 5.0 'R 2.0'R 44.0'RPROP. CONCRETECURB (TYP.)PROP. FLUSHCURBPROP. WOODGUIDERAILPROP. ASPHALT CURBWITHIN RIGHT OF WAY (TYP.)PROP. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 33,250 SF ±1"=30'0307.51530WESC-301OVERALL SITEPLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETSITE BREAKDOWNCATEGORYSQUARE FEET% OF PROPERTYPROPERTY AREAPROPOSED BUILDINGFOOTPRINTPERVIOUS COVERAGEPARKING AND PAVEDVEHICULAR AREAS148,93533,25073,98241,70310022.349.728.0 Z TWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSS S S EE E E E E E E E ESSSSSSSSSS 13.2 '20.0 '25.1'5.0'PROP. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 33,250 SF ±101191 29 911PROP. RETAINING WALL11 11109DDDD101010109 6 8 7 7 8 10 11 12 15 14 13 12 11 16 8121110 11 1213D1 41312 1113 12 11 18 17 16 15 19 14 9101111 10 9 910111010109879988 8D12131411 10987 12111010 PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2A)BOTTOM = 6.0PROP. CB-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.6PROP. CB-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.3PROP. DMH-1RIM = 9.8INV = 6.2PROP. DMH-2RIM = 9.7INV = 6.0PROP. BIO-RETENTIONCELL (BIO-1) (LINED)INV = 2.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE -1RIM=10.0INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 6.5INV OUT = 6.58 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. AD-1RIM = 9.4INV = 7.032 LF OF 6"HDPE, S=1.0%PROP. CB-3RIM = 9.5INV = 6.218 LF OF 12"HDPE, S=1.0%100 LF OF 12"PERFORATEDUNDERDRAIN,S=0.5%PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.0PROP. RDINV. = 6.526 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=1.0%160 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%WQU-1RIM = 10.4INV = 5.6DMH-3RIM = 10.6INV = 5.4DMH-4RIM = 10.6INV = 4.042 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%114 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=0.5%270 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-2RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 3.1PROP. CLEANOUTPROP. CLEANOUTINV.=3.9PROP. DMH-5RIM = 10.0INV (DMH-4) = 3.2INV (RD) = 3.6PROP. 6" PERFORATED UNDERDRAININV.=4.010.59.0±(M.E.)10.510.510.5TC=10.3±(M.E.)BC=9.9±(M.E.)TC=10.1)BC=9.6±(M.E.)TC=9.6±(M.E.)BC=9.3±(M.E.)TC=10.3BC=9.89.5±(M.E.)TC=10.5BC=10.014.5TC=7.8±(M.E.)BC=7.5±(M.E.)TC=7.7±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.5±(M.E.)BC=7.2±(M.E.)TC=7.6±(M.E.)BC=7.3±(M.E.)TC=8.0BC=7.5±(M.E.)7.97.77.913.013.012.57.88.17.8PROP. BIO-RETENTION CELL (BIO-2B)BOTTOM = 6.0PROP. OVERFLOW GRATE-3RIM=7.5INV IN (UNDERDRAIN) = 4.0INV OUT = 4.0122 LF OF 12" HDPE,S=2.4%87 LF OF 6" HDPE,S=0.0%21 LF OF 6" HDPE,S=1.0%85 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%PROP. RDINV. = 6.57.87.978 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=0.5%65 LF OF 12" HDPE, S=2.0%148 L F O F 1 2 " H D P E , S = 1 . 7 % 14 13 THIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR SITEGRADING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGENERAL NOTES SHEETFOR ADDITIONAL GRADING & UTILITYNOTESWES1"=30'0307.51530C-401GRADING &DRAINAGE PLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SET Z TPROP. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 33,250 SF ±DDDDDDWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSS S S EE E E E E E E E E 8" GRAVITY SEWERCONNECTION AT BUILDINGINV. = 6.5PROP.66 LF 8" SDR-35PVC, S=2.0%PROP. SMH-1RIM = 10.5INV. (IN) = 5.2PROP. 175 LF 8" SDR-35 PVC, S=1.0%PROP. SMH-2RIM = 10.1INV. = 3.45PROP.75 LF 8" SDR-35PVC, S=2.3%PROP.171 LF 8"SDR-35 PVC, S=1.0%EXTERIOR DROP TOEXISTING SMHINV = 1.7PROP. 4" DICL CLASS 52DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE(TYP.)PROP. 6" DICL CLASS 52FIRE PROTECTIONSERVICE (TYP.)PROP. 4" WATERCONNECTION TOMAIN W/ TAPPINGSLEEVE AND VALVE8" GRAVITY SEWERCONNECTION AT BUILDINGINV. = 5.2PROP. TRANSFORMERPROP. ELECTRICALSERVICE FROMEXISTING UTILITY POLEPROP. CONNECTION TO EX.8" WATER SERVICE AFTERVALVE. REDUCE TO 6".SSSSSSSSSSTHIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FORUTILITIES PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGENERAL NOTES SHEETFOR ADDITIONAL GRADING & UTILITYNOTES1"=30'0307.51530WESC-501UTILITY PLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SET Z PROP. INLETPROTECTION (TYP.)PROP. INLETPROTECTION (TYP.)SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFS F SF SF SFTEMP. SOIL STOCKPILE AREASURROUNDED BY STRAWBALES ORSILT SOCK AND SILT FENCE TO SERVEAS A SILTATION BARRIER (TYP.)PROP. STABILIZEDCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE/EXIT(MIN. 24'x100')PROP. STABILIZEDCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE/EXIT(MIN. 24'x100')PROP. LIMIT OFWORK (TYP.)PROP. SILT FENCE (TYP.)PROP. LIMIT OFWORK (TYP.)PROP. SILT FENCE (TYP.)PROP. LIMIT OFWORK (TYP.)PROP. SILT FENCE (TYP.)SFSFREFER TO SOIL EROSION CONTROLNOTES & DETAIL SHEET FOR EROSIONNOTES AND DETAILSTHIS PLAN TO BE UTILIZED FOR SITESOIL AND EROSION CONTROLPURPOSES ONLY1"=30'0307.51530WESC-601SOIL EROSION &SEDIMENTCONTROL PLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SET EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES1.ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE DONE AS SET FORTH IN THE MOST CURRENT STATESEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.2.THOSE AREAS UNDERGOING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION WILL BE LEFT IN AN UNTREATED OR UNVEGETATED CONDITION FORA MINIMUM TIME. AREAS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED WITHIN 15 DAYS OF FINAL GRADING AND TEMPORARILYSTABILIZED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INITIAL DISTURBANCE OF THE SOIL. IF THE DISTURBANCE IS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A STREAMOR POND, THE AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OR PRIOR TO ANY STORM EVENT (THIS WOULD INCLUDEWETLANDS).3.SEDIMENT BARRIERS (SILT FENCE, STRAW BARRIERS, ETC.) SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SOIL DISTURBANCE OFTHE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA ABOVE THEM. MULCH NETTING SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR MULCH IN ALL AREASWITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 15% AFTER OCTOBER 1ST THE SAME APPLIES FOR ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 8%.4.INSTALL SILTATION BARRIER AT TOE OF SLOPE TO FILTER SILT FROM RUNOFF. SEE SILTATION BARRIER DETAILS FORPROPER INSTALLATION. SILTATION BARRIER WILL REMAIN IN PLACE PER NOTE #5.5.ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES WILL BE INSPECTED, REPLACED AND/OR REPAIRED EVERY 7 DAYS AND IMMEDIATELYFOLLOWING ANY SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL OR SNOW MELT OR WHEN NO LONGER SERVICEABLE DUE TO SEDIMENTACCUMULATION OR DECOMPOSITION. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUSTBE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. SEDIMENT CONTROLDEVICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL AREAS UPSLOPE ARE STABILIZED BYTURF.6.NO SLOPES, EITHER PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY, SHALL BE STEEPER THAN TWO TO ONE (2:1).7.IF FINAL SEEDING OF THE DISTURBED AREAS IS NOT COMPLETED 45 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST KILLING FROST, USETEMPORARY MULCH (DORMANT SEEDING MAY BE ATTEMPTED AS WELL) TO PROTECT THE SITE AND DELAY SEEDING UNTILTHE NEXT RECOMMENDED SEEDING PERIOD.8.TEMPORARY SEEDING OF DISTURBED AREAS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINAL GRADED SHALL BE COMPLETED 45 DAYS PRIORTO THE FIRST KILLING FROST TO PROTECT FROM SPRING RUNOFF PROBLEMS.9.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE, INTERCEPTED SEDIMENT WILL BE RETURNED TO THE SITE AND REGRADED ONTOOPEN AREAS.10.REVEGETATION MEASURES WILL COMMENCE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION EXCEPT AS NOTED ABOVE. ALLDISTURBED AREAS NOT OTHERWISE STABILIZED WILL BE GRADED, SMOOTHED, AND PREPARED FOR FINAL SEEDING ASFOLLOWS:10.1.SIX INCHES OF LOAM WILL BE SPREAD OVER DISTURBED AREAS AND SMOOTHED TO A UNIFORM SURFACE.10.2.APPLY LIMESTONE AND FERTILIZER ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST. IF SOIL TESTING IS NOT FEASIBLE ON SMALL ORVARIABLE SITES, OR WHERE TIMING IS CRITICAL, FERTILIZER MAY BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 800 LB PER ACRE OR18.4 LB PER 1,000 SF USING 10-20-20 OR EQUIVALENT. APPLY GROUND LIMESTONE (EQUIVALENT TO 50% CALCIUM PLUSMAGNESIUM OXIDE) AT A RATE OF 3 TONS PER ACRE (138 LB PER1,000 SF).10.3.FOLLOWING SEED BED PREPARATION, DITCHES AND BACK SLOPES WILL BE SEEDED TO A MIXTURE OF 47% CREEPINGRED FESCUE, 5% REDTOP, AND 48% TALL FESCUE. THE LAWN AREAS WILL BE SEEDED TO A PREMIUM TURF MIXTUREOF 44% KENTUCKY BLUE-GRASS, 44% CREEPING RED FESCUE, AND 12% PERENNIAL RYEGRASS: SEEDING RATE IS 1.03LBS PER 1,000 SF LAWN QUALITY SOD MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SEED.10.4.STRAW MULCH AT THE RATE OF 70-90 LBS PER 1,000 SF. A HYDRO-APPLICATION OF WOOD OR PAPER FIBER SHALL BEAPPLIED FOLLOWING SEEDING. A SUITABLE BINDER SUCH AS CURASOL OR RMB PLUS WILL BE USED ON STRAW MULCHFOR WIND CONTROL.11.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE THE SITE IS STABILIZED.12.WETLANDS WILL BE PROTECTED W/ STRAW, COMPOST, AND/OR SILT FENCE BARRIERS INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THEWETLAND OR THE BOUNDARY OF WETLAND DISTURBANCE.13.ALL AREAS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FLAGGED WETLAND OR STREAM SHALL HAVE AN EXPOSURE WINDOW OF NOT MORETHAN 7 DAYS.14.ALL AREAS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A FLAGGED WETLAND OR STREAM SHALL FOLLOW APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROLMEASURES PRIOR TO EACH STORM IF NOT BEING ACTIVELY WORKED,MULCHLOCATIONMULCHRATE (1000 SF)PROTECT AREASTRAW 100 POUNDSWINDY AREASHREDDED OR CHOPPED CORNSTALKS185-275 POUNDSSTRAW (ANCHORED)*100 POUNDSMODERATE TO HIGHJUTE MESH OR EXCELSIOR MATAS REQUIREDVELOCITY AREAS ORSTEEP SLOPESGREATER THAN 3:1GREATER THAN 3:1 (REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FINAL DESIGN REQUIREMENT)* A HYDRO-APPLICATION OF WOOD, OR PAPER FIBER MAY BE APPLIED FOLLOWING SEEDING. A SUITABLE BINDER SUCH ASCURASOL OR RMBPLUS SHALL BE USED ON STRAW MULCH FOR WIND CONTROL.MULCH ANCHORINGANCHOR MULCH WITH PEG AND TWINE (1 SQ. YD/BLOCK); MULCH NETTING (AS PER MANUFACTURER); WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER(750 LBS/ACRE); CHEMICAL TACK (AS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS); USE OF A SERRATED STRAIGHT DISK. WETTINGFOR SMALL AREAS AND ROAD DITCHES MAY BE PERMITTED.EROSION CONTROL NOTES DURING WINTERCONSTRUCTION1.WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 15.2.WINTER EXCAVATION AND EARTHWORK SHALL BE DONE SUCH THAT NO MORE THAN 1 ACRE OF THE SITE IS WITHOUTSTABILIZATION AT ANY ONE TIME.3.EXPOSED AREA SHOULD BE LIMITED TO THAT WHICH CAN BE MULCHED IN ONE DAY PRIOR TO ANY SNOW EVENT.4.CONTINUATION OF EARTHWORK OPERATION ON ADDITIONAL AREAS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE EXPOSED SOIL SURFACEON THE AREA BEING WORKED HAS BEEN STABILIZED SUCH THAT NO LARGER AREA OF THE SITE IS WITHOUT EROSIONCONTROL PROTECTION AS LISTED IN ITEM 2 ABOVE.5.AN AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE BEEN STABILIZED WHEN EXPOSED SURFACES HAVE BEEN EITHER MULCHEDWITH STRAW OR STRAW AT A RATE OF 100 LB. PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET (WITH OR WITHOUT SEEDING) OR DORMANTSEEDED, MULCHED AND ADEQUATELY ANCHORED BY AN APPROVED ANCHORING TECHNIQUE.6.BETWEEN THE DATES OF OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 1ST, LOAM OR SEED WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. DURING PERIODS OFABOVE FREEZING TEMPERATURES THE SLOPES SHALL BE FINE GRADED AND EITHER PROTECTED WITH MULCH ORTEMPORARILY SEEDED AND MULCHED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE FINAL TREATMENT CAN BE APPLIED. IF THE DATE IS AFTERNOVEMBER 1ST AND IF THE EXPOSED AREA HAS BEEN LOAMED, FINAL GRADED AND IS SMOOTH, THEN THE AREA MAY BEDORMANT SEEDED AT A RATE OF 200 - 300% HIGHER THAN SPECIFIED FOR PERMANENT SEED AND THEN MULCHED. IFCONSTRUCTION CONTINUES DURING FREEZING WEATHER, ALL EXPOSED AREAS SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY GRADEDBEFORE FREEZING AND THE SURFACE TEMPORARILY PROTECTED FROM EROSION BY THE APPLICATION OF MULCH.SLOPES SHALL NOT BE LEFT UNEXPOSED OVER THE WINTER OR ANY OTHER EXTENDED TIME OF WORK SUSPENSIONUNLESS TREATED IN THE ABOVE MANNER. UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WEATHER CONDITIONS ALLOW DITCHES TO BE FINISHEDWITH THE PERMANENT SURFACE TREATMENT, EROSION SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE INSTALLATION OF BALES OFSTRAW OR STONE CHECK DAMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD DETAILS.7.MULCHING REQUIREMENTS:7.1.BETWEEN THE DATES OF NOVEMBER 1ST AND APRIL 15TH ALL MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED BY EITHER PEG LINE,MULCH NETTING OR WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER.7.2.MULCH NETTING SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR MULCH IN ALL DRAINAGE WAYS WITH A SLOPE GREATER THAN 3% FORSLOPE EXPOSED TO DIRECT WINDS AND FOR ALL OTHER SLOPES GREATER THAN 8%.7.3.MULCH NETTING SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR MULCH IN ALL AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 15% AFTEROCTOBER 1ST THE SAME APPLIES FOR ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 8%.8.AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY DORMANT SEEDING OR MULCH AND ANCHORING ON ALL BAREEARTH AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.9.DURING THE WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ALL SNOW SHALL BE REMOVED FROM AREAS OF SEEDING AND MULCHINGPRIOR TO PLACEMENT.10.STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS (DIRT, WOOD, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, ETC.) MUST REMAIN COVERED AT ALL TIMES TOMINIMIZE ANY DUST PROBLEMS THAT MAY OCCUR WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM PROTECTIONAGAINST EROSION RUNOFF.11.EXISTING CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THEY ARE REMOVED.ARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETC-602EROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL NOTESAND DETAILSTHE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS RECOMMENDED:-INSTALLATION OF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT (AS SHOWN)-INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL BARRIER (AS SHOWN)-DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SITE STRUCTURES-CLEARING AND GRUBBING-EARTHWORK AND EXCAVATION/FILLING AS NECESSARY-CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES-STABILIZE PERMANENT LAWN AREAS AND SLOPES WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING (AS NECESSARY)-INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION OF ON-SITE UTILITIES-CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION OF ALL CURBING AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS-SPREAD TOPSOIL ON SLOPED AREAS AND SEED AND MULCH-FINAL GRADING OF ALL SLOPED AREAS-PLACE 6" TOPSOIL ON SLOPES AFTER FINAL GRADING COMPLETED. FERTILIZE, SEED, AND MULCH SEEDMIXTURE TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED.-PAVE PARKING LOT-LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPING PLAN-REMOVE EROSION CONTROLS AS DISTURBED AREAS BECOME STABILIZED TO 70% STABILIZATION ORGREATER.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEN.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.GEOTEXTILE BAGOVERFLOW HOLESLOOPS SIZED FOR 1"REBAR. USE REBAR FORA HANDLE TO EMPTYFILTER SACK AT ASEDIMENT COLLECTIONLOCATION.LOOPS SIZED FOR 1"REBAR. LIFT FILTERBAG FROM INLETUSING REBAR FORHANDLES.2"X2"X3/4" RUBBERBLOCK (TYP) PROFILE VIEW OF INSTALLEDFILTER SACK1.REMOVE TRAPPED SEDIMENT WHEN BRIGHTLY COLORED EXPANSIONRESTRAINT CAN NO LONGER BE SEEN.2.GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE A WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC THAT MEETSOR EXCEEDS REQUIREMENTS IN THE SPECIFICATIONS TABLE.3.PLACE AN OIL ADSORBENT PAD OR PILLOW OVER INLET GRATE WHENOIL SPILLS ARE A CONCERN.4.INSPECT PER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.5.THE WIDTH, "W", OF THE FILTER SACK SHALL MATCH THE INSIDE WIDTHOF THE GRATED INLET BOX.6.THE DEPTH, "D", OF THE FILTER SACK SHALL BE BETWEEN 18 INCHESAND 36 INCHES7.THE LENGTH, "L", OF THE FILTER SACK SHALL MATCH THE INSIDELENGTH OF THE GRATED INLET BOX.8.DO NOT USE IN PAVED AREAS WHERE PONDING MAY CAUSE TRAFFICHAZARDS.GRAB TENSILE STRENGTHGRAB TENSILE ELONGATIONPUNCTUREMULLEN BURSTTRAPEZOID TEARUV RESISTANCEAPPARENT OPENING SIZEFLOW RATEPERMITTIVITYPROPERTIES TEST METHOD UNITSASTM D-4632ASTM D-4632ASTM D-4833ASTM D-3786ASTM D-4533ASTM D-4355ASTM D-4751ASTM D-4491ASTM D-4491300 LBS20 %120 LBS800 PSI120 LBS80 %40 US SIEVE40 GAL/MIN/SQ FT0.55 SEC -1GRAB TENSILE STRENGTHGRAB TENSILE ELONGATIONPUNCTUREMULLEN BURSTTRAPEZOID TEARUV RESISTANCEAPPARENT OPENING SIZEFLOW RATEPERMITTIVITYPROPERTIES TEST METHOD UNITSASTM D-4632ASTM D-4632ASTM D-4833ASTM D-3786ASTM D-4533ASTM D-4355ASTM D-4751ASTM D-4491ASTM D-4491LOW TO MODERATE FLOW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SPECIFICATION TABLEMODERATE TO HIGH FLOW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SPECIFICATION TABLE265 LBS20 %135 LBS420 PSI45 LBS90 %20 US SIEVE200 GAL/MIN/SQ FT1.5 SEC -1INLET GRATE1/4" BRIGHTLY COLOREDNYLON ROPE EXPANSIONRESTRAINTISOMETRIC VIEWSECTION VIEWSECURE LIFTING LOOPS TO ORUNDER SURROUNDING SURFACE.1/4" BRIGHTLY COLOREDNYLON ROPE EXPANSIONRESTRAINTDEPTH = D FINISHGRADEFILTER SACKS (GRATED INLETS)STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITPERCENT SLOPE OF ROADWAY0 TO 2%2% TO 5%>5%LENGTH OF STONE REQUIREDCOARSE GRAINED SOILSFINE GRAINED SOILS50 FT100 FTENTIRE ENTRANCE STABILIZED WITH FABC BASE COURSE (1)(1) AS PRESCRIBED BY LOCAL ORDINANCE OR OTHER GOVERNING AUTHORITY.100 FT200FTCHART 1PLAN VIEWPROFILE VIEW"L" = 50' MIN. (SEE CHART 1)"L" = 50' MIN. (SEE CHART 1)PUBLIC R.O.W.2"-3" CLEAN ANGULARCRUSHED STONE(6" MIN. THICKNESS)EXISTING GROUNDFULL WIDTH OF ACCESS DRIVECONSTRUCTIONFENCE / GATES(AS APPLICABLE)PITCH TO DRAIN AWAY FROMPUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYPROVIDE GEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC UNDER STONE(MIRAFI 140N, OR EQUAL)SIDEWALK(OR SHOULDER)TRAVELEDWAYCONSTRUCTIONACCESSDRIVEGRADE TO DRAINAWAY FROMPUBLIC ROADWAYSEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FORSITE SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION PERIODSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTSPROVIDE CORNER ROUNDINGS(AS APPLICABLE FOR SITESPECIFIC CONDITIONS)5'MIN.MAINTENANCE NOTES:1.INSPECT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / ANTI-TRACKING PAD AND SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WEEKLY OR AFTER EVERY MAJOR RAINSTORM EVENT.2.WASH WATER (IF USED) SHALL BE DIRECTED TOWARD A SEDIMENT TRAP, SUFFICIENTLY SIZED FOR SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS.3.EXCESSIVELY MUD-CLOGGED STONE SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, AS NEEDED.4.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MIN. (1) ONE CONSTRUCTION EXIT FOR PROPOSED WORK. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR ASCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING DICTATES.TYP. SILTATION FENCE DETAILTOE-IN METHODSPERSPECTIVE OF FENCEDETAIL OF POST ATTACHMENT(PRE-ASSEMBLED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION)FLOWINSTALLATION:1. EXCAVATE A 6"x 6" TRENCH ALONG THE LINE OF EROSION CONTROL OFTHE SITE.2. UNROLL SILTATION FENCE AND POSITION THE POSTS AGAINST THEBACK (DOWNSTREAM) WALL OF THE TRENCH (NET SIDE AWAY FROM FLOWDIRECTION).3. DRIVE THE POST INTO THE GROUND UNTIL THE NETTING IS LAYINGACROSS THE TRENCH BOTTOM.4. LAY THE TOE-IN FLAP OF THE FABRIC ONTO THE UNDISTURBED BOTTOMOF THE TRENCH, BACKFILL THE TRENCH AND TAMP THE SOIL. TOE-IN CANALSO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY LAYING FABRIC FLAP ON UNDISTURBEDGROUND AND PILING & TAMP- ING FILL AT THE BASE.24" MIN. 12" MIN. (12" MAX IN ROCKY SOIL)WOOD OR PLASTIC SLATSTAPLED THROUGH FABRIC TOPOST1- 12" x 1-12" POSTFABRICSILT FENCE(3' WIDE) FABRICPOSTPOSTSLATFILTER FABRICBACKFILLSLATFILTER FABRICBACKFILL6" MIN.LAPNATIVE SOILPOSTBACKFILL1335' MAXIMUMTEMPORARY STOCKPILE1:3 MAXIMUM SLOPECONSTRUCT SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF STOCKPILEPLACE STRAWBALE TWINE ON HORIZONTALFLOWPLACE STRAW BALE ON CONTOUR AND WING LAST STRAW BALES UPSLOPESO THAT TOP OF LAST SEVERAL HAY BALES ARE HIGHER THEN LINE OFHAY BALESEXCAVATE TRENCH 4" AND PLACE FILL UP-SLOPE OF TRENCHPLACE STRAW BALE AND STAKE FIRST STAKE AT ANGLE TOWARDS FIRSTBALE. STAKES ARE 18" MIN. INTO GROUNDWEDGE LOOSE STRAW BETWEEN BALESBACKFILL & COMPACT EXCAVATED FILL ALONG STRAW BALE18"5-10 MIN. TO TOE OF SLOPEBALE WIDTH STRAWBALE BARRIER42314"1.2.3.4.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S. N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.C-901DETAIL SHEETFLOWTOP OF CELLTOP OF BERMUNDISTURBED SUBGRADEPROPOSEDGRADE 3:1 MAX.WRAP IN CLAYLINER (AS NOTEDON SHEET C401)PERFORATED PVC PIPETO OUTLET STRUCTUREBIORETENTION AREAPLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS)8"12"6"8" WIDE GRAVEL STRIP AT 2% SLOPE MAX.4'-4" WIDE SOD STRIP AT 2% SLOPE MAX.PROPOSED PAVEMENT GRADE6" TOPSOIL2.0'0.67'BIORETENTION CELL3"6"12" DIA. OVERFLOW GRATE6" PERFORATED PVCUNDERDRAIN8" AT TOP9-3/4"(VARIESPER I.D.)5",7",OR 4'-0" (MIN.)(SEE NOTE #2)12" COMPACTED GRAVELCOMBINATION OF 1, 2,3, OR 4' SECTIONSPRECAST CONCRETE STORM DRAIN MANHOLEFINISH GRADE24" DIA. HEAVY DUTY FRAME & COVER C.I.,LeBARON LA-248-1 OR APPROVED EQUAL, RIMELEV. (SEE PLAN) (LABEL "DRAIN')MORTAR ALL AROUNDTWO COURSES OF BRICK MASONARYMINIMUM, FOUR MAXIMUM BED FRAM ANDBRICK WORK IN 3/8" MIN. FULL MORTARBED.PRECAST REINFORCED 6" THICKCONCRETE CONE OR FLAT 8" THICK LID(WHERE BURIAL IS SHALLOW).ALUMINUM OR PLASTIC COATEDWROUGHT IRON STEPS @ 16" O.C.BUTYL RUBBER SEALANT (TYP.)PRECAST REINFORCEDCONCRETE RISER SECT.'S ASREQUIREDNON-SHRINK MORTAR @ PIPEOPENING ALL AROUNDCOMPACTED SUBGRADE2500 PSI CONC. INVERTTO BE POURED WHENMANHOLE IS COMPLETED11" MAX. 3' OR 4'2' - 0"6" MIN. 6"FLOWNOTES:1. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR H-20 LOADINGAND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C478.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SIZE MANHOLE AS NECESSARY TOACCOMMODATE THE PIPE SIZING AND ORIENTATION USING THEGEOMETRY SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS.4' MIN.PLANSECTIONSTANDARD CONNECTIONFOUNDATION CUSHION4" SADDLE TEE WITHRUBBER SEAL (OPENINGTO BE DRILLED IN PIPE)ADAPTOR COUPLING TO C.I. SOIL PIPE6" MIN4" PVC SCH 40 PIPE18 BEND6" X 4" REDUCERMINIMUM SLOPE 14" PER FOOTPLUGBRASS CAP (SEERISER DETAIL)SANITARY SEWER"Y" BRANCHOR DOUBLE"Y" BRANCH30° ELBOW6" X 4" REDUCER4" TEE-WYEPLUGCHISELED "V" LOCATIONMARK ON CURBYARD DRAINNOTE:10" DOME GRATE DETAIL AS MANUFACTURED BY "ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS,INC.", 3300 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43221, (800) 821-6710, OR APPROVEDEQUAL.5.3" .43" 10.28" 11"10"4" - 8"HYDRANT & VALVE INSTALLATION1' - 6"2' - 0"1 58"1' MIN.4' - 0" MIN.CRUSHED STONE ORCOURSE GRAVELCONCRETE THRUST BLOCKFLAT ROCK OR CONCRETERET. GLANDS6" CAST IRON GATE VALVEWITH MECHANICAL JOINT ENDSCONCRETE THRUST BLOCKCEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPE8" WATER MAINRET GLANDS4 34" RESTRAINING RODS COATED WITHKOPPERS SUPERSERVICE BLACKRET GLANDSTWO PIECE SLIDING TYPE VALVE BOX"MUELLER" CATALOG NO. H - 10364COVER TO BE MARKED "WATER" WITHARROW TO SHOW DIRECTION TO OPENIF NO CURB, LOCATION TO BEAS DIRECTED BY TOWN DPWOR WATER DEPARTMENT4 12" STEAMER NOZZLEWITH 5 14" VALVE OPENINGAND BREAKAWAY FLANGEHEXAGONAL OPERATING NUTCONNECTIONS AS REQUIRED BYLOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENTNEW HYDRANT OR RE - USEEXISTING HYDRANT ASDENOTED ON PLAN (TYP)GRADELIGHTLY COMPACTEDGRANULAR MATERILABURLAP, CANVAS, ORPOLYETHYLENE SHEETINGOVER 1 12" CRUSHED STONEHYDRANT DRAIN HOLESTO BE LEFT OPEN6'-0" MIN. (PER WATERDEPARTMENT)(DETAIL FOR GENERAL PURPOSES. GC TO COORDINATECONNECTION W/ WATER COMPANY)ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOXFINISH GRADECURB STOPPROVIDE 2 CU. FT. OF SCREENED GRAVEL2" TYPE "K" COPPERCORP. STOPEXISTING WATER MAINWATER/SERVICE CONSTRUCTIONARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETPRECAST CONCRETE CURBNOTE:6"7"6" MIN.6"12"6"1.CURB SHALL CONSIST OF 4,000 PSI AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE, EXPOSED EDGES TOHAVE RUBBED FINISH AND SURFACE SHALL BE TREATED WITH A CONCRETEPENETRANT/SEALER.2.THE ENDS OF CURB SECTIONS SHALL BE CHAMFERED 1/4 INCH.3.THE CORNERS OF CURB SECTIONS SHALL MATCH THE ADJACENT CURB IN SIZE,COLOR AND FINISH.4.CURBS, CURB CORNERS OR EDGING SHALL BE FITTED TOGETHER AS CLOSELY ASPOSSIBLE.5.EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MAXIMUM OF TWENTY FEET (20') ONCENTER USING PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER HAVING A THICKNESS OF 1/2INCH.BITUMINOUS CONCRETESURFACE COURSEBITUMINOUS CONCRETEBASE COURSEGRAVEL BASE COURSECOMPACTED SUBGRADEFINISH GRADE3/4" RADIUS6"1"TOPSOILSEWER DROP INLETNOTES:1.DIMENSIONS & CONSTRUCTION OF DROP MANHOLE TO BE SIMILAR TO TYPICAL PRECASTCONCRETE MANHOLE, (SHEET #), EXCEPT AS SHOWN.2.DROP PIPE TO BE SAME DIAMETER AS SEWER DISCHARGING INTO MANHOLE.3.DEEPER DROP MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH STRAIGHT PIPE BETWEEN Y - BRANCH AND ELBOW.4.EXTEND CONCRETE ENCASEMENT TO FIRST JOINT BEYOND EXCAVATION FOR DROP CONNECTION.5.ALL DROP PIPING TO HAVE A MIN. 6" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT, AS SHOWN.REVERSE P.V.C. Y - BRANCH CONNECTION(SEE NOTE NO. 4)30 ° P.V.C. CUT CURVE45° P.V.C.CUT CURVES3,000 PSI AIR ENTRAINEDCONCRETE PLACED AGAINSTUNDISTURBED MATERIAL ORSHEETING (TYP)BRICK DAMCUT OPENING IN PRECASTMANHOLE BARREL & SEAL WITHNON-SHRINK MORTAR (TYP)SEE NOTE NO. 5CDS1515-5-C WQU DETAILPLAN VIEW B-BN.T.S.FIBERGLASS SEPARATIONCYLINDER AND INLETCENTER OF CDS STRUCTURE,SCREEN AND SUMP OPENINGHDPE HYDRAULICSHEAR PLATE2'-0" [610](2'-0" [610])1'-9" [533](4'-8" [1422])ELEVATION A-AN.T.S.FIBERGLASS SEPARATIONCYLINDER AND INLETSOLIDS STORAGE SUMPSEPARATIONSCREENINLET PIPE(MULTIPLE INLET PIPES MAYBE ACCOMMODATED)OUTLET PIPEHDPE HYDRAULICSHEAR PLATE(4'-0" [1219])FLOWPERMANENT POOLELEV.OIL BAFFLE SKIRTA### [####] I.D. MANHOLESTRUCTURETOP SLAB ACCESS(SEE FRAME ANDCOVER DETAIL)VARIES FRAME AND COVER(DIAMETER VARIES)N.T.S.+/-135°MAX.+/-65°MAX.FLOWCONTRACTOR TO GROUTTO FINISHED GRADEGRADERINGS/RISERSBBA FOR MAINTENANCE CALL 1.800.338.1122 www.contechES.comTMClean water starts here®FLOWNOTE: ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR H-20 LOADINGAND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C478.6" MIN.6" MIN.COMBINATION OF 1, 2,3, OR 4' SECTIONS 3' OR 4'BITUMASTIC COATINGALL AROUND8" AT TOP2'-6"4'-0"5"5"12" COMPACTED GRAVEL11" MAX.TYP. PRECAST CONCRETE SANITARY MANHOLESEE ATTACHED DETAIL FORCONNECTION TO EXISTING SEWER PIPECOMPACTED SUBGRADEBRICK FLOW TROUGHFLEXIBLE RUBBER GASKET INMANHOLES@ OPENING FOR PIPESPRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETERISER SECT.'S AS REQUIREDBUTYL RUBBER SEALANT (TYP.)ALUMINUM OR PLASTIC COASTEDWROUGHT IRON STEPS @ 16" O.C.PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONETWP COURSES OF BRICK MASONRYMINIMUM, FOUR MAXIMUM, BED FRAME ANDBRICK WORK IN 38" MIN FULL MORTAR BEDMORTAR ALL AROUNDFINISH GRADE32" Ø HEAVY DUTY FRAME & COVER 30" CLEAR OPENING C.I.LeBARON LA - 248 - 1 OR APPROVED EQUAL, RIM ELEV. (SEE PLAN)(LABEL " SEWER MANHOLE") (INSTALL A WATERTIGHT GASKET SEAL)PIPE DIA.MIN. TRANCH WIDTH23"26"28"30"34"39"48"6"8"10"12"15"18"24"56"30"64"36"80"48"96"60"RECOMMENDED MIN. TRENCH WIDTHNOTES:1. ALL PIPE SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321 , "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPEFOR SEWERS AND OTHER GRAVITY FLOW APPLICATIONS", LATEST ADDITION.2. MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF NATIVE FINES INTO BACKFILL MATERIAL, WHEN REQUIRED.3. FOUNDATION: WHERE THE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AND REPLACE WITHSUITABLE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. AS AN ALTERNATIVE AND AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER, THE TRENCH BOTTOM MAY BESTABILIZED USING A GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL.4. BEDDING: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY THE ENGINEER, MINIMUM BEDDING THICKNESS SHALL BE 4" (100mm) FOR 4"-24" (100mm-600mm); 6" (150mm) FOR 30"-60" (7S0mm-900mm).5. INITIAL BACKFILL: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III IN THE PIPE ZONE EXTENDING NOT LESS THAN 6" ABOVE CROWN OF PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLPROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION.6. MINIMUM COVER: MINIMUM COVER, H, IN NON-TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS (GRASS OR LANDSCAPE AREAS) IS 12" FROM THE TOP OF PIPE TO GROUND SURFACE.ADDITIONAL COVER MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT FLOATION. FOR TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS, MINIMUM COVER, H, IS 12" UP TO 48" DIAMETER PIPE AND 24" OF COVERFOR 54"-60" DIAMETER PIPE, MEASURED FROM TOP OF PIPE TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR TO TOP OF RIGID PAVEMENT.MIN. COVER TO FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT, HFINALBACKFILL6"SPRINGLINEINITIAL BACKFILLHAUNCHBEDDINGSUITABLE FOUNDATION4" FOR 12"-24" PIPE 6" FOR 30"-60" PIPE MIN. TRENCH WIDTH (SEE TABLE)PROP. WATER or SOIL TIGHT HDPE PIPEDIA. PER PLANHDPE STORM DRAINAGE TRENCHTYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH(3' MIN.)6"IN EARTHHALF SECTIONW (D+2')HALF SECTIOND12"SELECT BACKFILLUNPAVED}PAVEDIN ROCK ANY SHEETINGDRIVEN BELOW MID-DIA.OF PIPE SHALL BE LEFTIN PLACEMATCHEXISTINGWATER, SEWER, DRAIN, OR FORCE MAIN PIPEBACKFILL WITH GRAVELBEDDING TO MID-DIAMETERWHEN OTHER THAN PVC PIPEIS USEDBACKFILL WITH GRAVELBEDDING 12" OVER PIPEWHEN PVC PIPE IS USEDSHEETING (IF REQ'D) TO BE CUT OFF5' MIN BELOW GROUND & 2' MINABOVE TOP OF PIPE6" TOPSOIL & SEEDNOTES:1.SEWER PIPE SHALL BE BED IN SCREENED GRAVEL, 8 INCHESON BOTTOM, AROUND THE PIPE, AND 12 INCHES ON TOP. N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S.C-901DETAIL SHEETARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLELEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCAMWNG/MMWMARKDATE5/3/202245 FRANKLIN STREET, 5th FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110Phone:(617) 849-8040www.BohlerEngineering.comDESCRIPTIONSALEM CON COM SET7/1/2022UPDATED PERMIT SET7/12/2022SALEM CON COM SETNOTE: ALL CARRIAGE BOLTS, NUTS & WASHERS TO BE GALVANIZED& ALL WOOD POSTS & RAILS TO BE PRESSURE TREATED.(MIN.) 1' TOBACK OF CURB2.5"2.5"1.5"2'-6"3'-0"WOOD GUIDERAILFINISH GRADE4" X 12" X 8' - 0" LONG WOOD GUARD RAIL58" Ø X 12" LONG CARRIAGE BOLTS(TYP) 124 BOLTS REQUIRED OER8" X 8" X 5' -6" LONGWOOD POST @ 8' - 0" OCCURBOR REQUIREDDEPTH BY CODEBITUMINOUS CONCRETE CURBBITUMINOUS CONCRETE CURBBITUMINOUS ONCRETESURFACE COURSEBITUMINOUS CONCRETEBASE COURSEGRAVEL BASE COURSECOMPACTED SUBGRADEFINISH GRADER = 2"TOPSOIL3" 6"6"9"75°44° 1" +/- MAINTENANCE PERIOD: 90 DAYS 1.THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PLANT IS PLANTED AND SHALL CONTINUE FOR A MINIMUM OF 90 DAYS FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING INSTALLATIONS, OR UNTIL THE CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF ALL PLANTING WORK, WHICHEVER IS A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME. 2.AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, THE CONTRACTOR WILL REQUEST INSPECTION BY THE ENGINEER AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE ANTICIPATED DATE OF INSPECTION. 3.AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, IF THE PLANT MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER, THE ENGINEER SHALL ISSUE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE TO THE CONTRACTOR. THE DATE OF THE INSPECTION SHALL ESTABLISH THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD AND THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE REQUIRED ONE-YEAR ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD FOR PLANTING WORK. 4.IF IN THE ENGINEER'S OPINION, PLANT MATERIALS AND/OR WORKMANSHIP IS DEFICIENT, ACCEPTANCE WILL NOT BE GRANTED, AND THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD FOR ALL THE PLANTS SHALL BE EXTENDED UNTIL PLANT REPLACEMENTS ARE MADE OR OTHER DEFICIENCIES ARE CORRECTED. ALL DEAD AND UNSATISFACTORY PLANTS WILL BE REMOVED PROMPTLY FROM THE PROJECT. REPLACEMENT PLANTS SHALL CONFORM IN ALL RESPECTS TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ORIGINAL PLANTS AND SHALL BE PLANTED IN THE SAME MANNER. ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD: ONE YEAR 1.THE PURPOSE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD IS TO NURTURE PLANTS THROUGH AT LEAST ONE FULL GROWING SEASON AND ONE FULL WINTER. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER ONE YEAR AFTER CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE AND SHALL BE ALIVE AND IN SATISFACTORY GROWTH AT THE END OF THAT TIME. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING INSPECTION EARLY ENOUGH IN THE SEASON TO ALLOW ADEQUATE TIME TO PROCURE AND INSTALL REPLACEMENT MATERIAL. 2.AT THE END OF THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, EACH PLANT SHALL SHOW HEALTHY GROWTH ON AT LEAST 75 PERCENT OF ITS TERMINAL STEMS, AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. DETERMINATION OF HEALTHY GROWTH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, VIABLE LEAVES (IN SEASON) AND TERMINAL BUDS, AS WELL AS LIVE CAMBIUM. PLANTS FOUND TO BE UNACCEPTABLE SHALL BE REMOVED PROMPTLY FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED IMMEDIATELY OR DURING THE NEXT NORMAL PLANTING SEASON, AS PERMITTED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS. 3.THE ENGINEER WILL INSPECT THE REPLACEMENT PLANTING WORK UPON THE REQUEST OF THE CONTRACTOR. REQUEST FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE RECEIVED BY THE ENGINEER AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE ANTICIPATED DATE OF INSPECTION. 4.UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK OF REPLACEMENT PLANTING, THE ENGINEER SHALL ISSUE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR ALL PLANTS INSTALLED UNDER THIS SECTION TO THE CONTRACTOR OTHERWISE INDICATED. LAYOUT AND MATERIAL NOTES 1.THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED TO DEPICT THE LOCATION, LAYOUT, AND MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION AND IS INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH APPLICABLE SPECIFICATION SECTIONS. 2.IMPLEMENTING WORKER SAFETY AND/OR HEALTH PROTOCOLS THAT ADDRESS COMPLIANCE WITH RULES, LAWS, AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION SAFETY AND/OR THE POTENTIAL AND/OR ACTUAL RISK OF EXPOSURE TO SITE-SPECIFIC PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL HAZARDS IS SOLELY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 3.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH FOUR (4) INCHES OF LOAM, SEEDED, FERTILIZED, AND MULCHED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROLS AS REQUIRED. 4.CONSTRUCTION AND CONTROL JOINTS: SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT SHALL NOT CONTINUE THROUGH CONSTRUCTION JOINTS. AT CONTROL JOINTS, CUT REINFORCEMENT WIRES. 5.PRIOR TO INITIATION OF CONCRETE FLATWORK, SUBMIT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION JOINT PLAN TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. COORDINATE SUCH PLAN WITH THE JOINT PATTERNS DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 6.UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER SIDEWALK DETAIL. 7.THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, INCLUDING THE INTENDED DIMENSIONS OF THE WORK, MAY VARY FROM ACTUAL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENTS TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AS WELL AS OTHER DIMENSIONS HE MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE TO FACILITATE THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. 8.USE ONE SINGLE BENCHMARK FOR WORK. 9.DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE TO FACE OF CURB, PAVEMENT EDGE, EDGE OR CENTERLINE OF IMPROVEMENT, OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10.ENGAGE A MASSACHUSETTS LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR TO PERFORM LAND-SURVEYING SERVICES REQUIRED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO VERIFICATION AND LAYOUT OF BASELINES, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS. REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER. 11.PROVIDE FOR THE LAYOUT AND STAKING/MARKING OF THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING FURNISHINGS. OBTAIN ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF THE LAYOUT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 12.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, LINES ARE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO LINE FROM WHICH THEY ARE MEASURED. 13.PROVIDE SLEEVES AT CURBS, WALLS, FOUNDATIONS FOR ALL UTILITY LINE CONNECTIONS. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND LIMIT OF WORK DUE TO THEIR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. PLANTING NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR JUDGING THE FULL EXTENT OF WORK REQUIREMENTS INVOLVED. THIS RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: TRANSPORTATION, PURCHASE, TEMPORARY STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF PLANTS; PLANT RE-HANDLING PRIOR TO FINAL INSTALLATION; REMOVAL AND OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF EXISTING LOAM DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE UNACCEPTABLE; PURCHASE, TRANSPORT, AND SUPPLY OF LOAM. 2.VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND REPORT ANY CONFLICTS TO THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. 3.TREE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOW DESIGN INTENT ONLY. TREE LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED IN THE FIELD WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. 5.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE AS THEY BORE TO GRADE IN THE NURSERY. 6.ALL TREES NOTED FOR CLEARING AND SELECTIVE PRUNING AND THINNING SHALL BE EXECUTED BY A LICENSED ARBORIST. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEARLY MARK LIMITS OF CLEARING AND LIMITS OF SELECTIVE PRUNING AND THINNING, FOR REVIEW BY THE A/E PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING OPERATIONS. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION THAT IS TAGGED BY THE A/E, "TO BE SAVED". 9.ALL TREES TO BE SAVED SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A RIGID FENCE AND HAY BALES CIRCLING THE TREE AT A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 1/2 THE CANOPY, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10.THE A/E RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJUST FINAL GRADES IN THE FIELD TO SAVE EXISTING VEGETATION. 11.LOAM AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 12.CAUTION SHALL BE USED NOT TO EXTEND MULCH LAYER ABOVE SOIL LEVEL AT TRUNKS/STEMS OF INSTALLED PLANT MATERIAL. 13.PROVIDE FIVE (5) FOOT DIAMETER MULCH CIRCLE AROUND ALL INDIVIDUAL TREE PLANTINGS AND CONTINUOUS MULCH BED AROUND SHRUB PLANTINGS. 14.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL AND PRODUCTIVE TOPSOIL OF GOOD CLAY-LOAM TYPE. IT SHALL BE FREE OF WEED SEEDS. TOPSOIL SHALL BE WITHOUT ADMIXTURE OF SUBSOIL AND SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE OF STONES, LUMPS, ROOTS, STICKS AND OTHER FOREIGN MATTER. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE WORKED OR APPLIED IN A MUDDY OR WET CONDITION. 15.REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS FROM SOIL SURFACE AND GRADE TO AN EVEN SURFACE 16.PROVIDE FERTILIZER OR OTHER SOIL AMENDMENTS AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BASED UPON THE FINDINGS OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT. 17.A/E TO SELECT AND INSPECT PLANT MATERIAL AT THE NURSERY AND AGAIN AT SITE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 18.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE LEGIBLY TAGGED WITH THE BOTANICAL NAME. ONLY PLANT STOCK GROWN WITHIN HARDINESS ZONES 1 THROUGH 6A, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE USDA PLANT HARDINESS ZONE MAP, WILL BE ACCEPTED. THE CONTRACTOR'S SUPPLIERS MUST CERTIFY IN WRITING THAT THE STOCK HAS ACTUALLY BEEN GROWN UNDER ZONE 6A OR HARDIER CONDITIONS. PLANTS NOT CERTIFIED WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 19.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE TYPICAL OF THEIR SPECIES OR VARIETY IN GROWTH HABIT. PLANT SIZES, HABIT, ROOT BALLS, AND CONTAINERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ASNS), STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN (AAN) AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE. 20.NO SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT MATERIAL WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROPOSE NOR INSTALL INVASIVE PLANTS ON SITE. 21.ALL PLANTS MUST BE MOVED WITH THE ROOT SYSTEMS IN SOIL. BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH UNTREATED 8 OUNCE BURLAP, FIRMLY HELD IN PLACE BY A STOUT CORD. WIRE CONTAINERS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ALLOW ROOT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PLANT SIZE, PER ASNS REQUIREMENTS. PLANTS PREPARED WITH PLASTIC OR OTHER NON_BIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. ROOT BALLS SHALL REMAIN INTACT DURING ALL OPERATIONS. NO PLANT WILL BE ACCEPTED IF THE ROOT BALL HAS BEEN BADLY CRACKED OR BROKEN PRIOR TO, OR DURING, THE PROCESS OF PLANTING. ROOT BALLS SHALL BE MOIST UPON ARRIVAL AND SHALL BE KEPT MOIST UNTIL INSTALLATION. ALL BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTS THAT CANNOT BE PLANTED AT ONCE MUST BE HEELED IN BY SETTING THEM IN THE GROUND, COVERING THE ROOT BALLS WITH SOIL, AND WATERING THEM ADEQUATELY. 22.EACH PLANT SHALL HAVE PLENTY OF FIBROUS ROOTS, HEALTHY BUDS, AND SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASE OR INSECT PESTS, EGGS OR LARVAE. ALL PLANT PARTS SHALL SHOW ACTIVE GREEN CAMBIUM WHEN CUT. THEY SHALL BE DENSELY FOLIATED WHEN IN LEAF. 23.THE TRUNK OF EACH TREE SHALL BE FREE FROM SUN SCALD, FROST CRACKS, OR WOUNDS RESULTING FROM ABRASIONS, FIRE OR OTHER CAUSES. PRUNING WOUNDS SHALL BE NO LARGER THAN 2 INCHES AND SHALL SHOW VIGOROUS SCAR TISSUE. NO TREES WITH DOUBLE_LEADERS OR TWIN HEADS WILL BE ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. NO PLANT MATERIAL FROM COLD STORAGE WILL BE ACCEPTED. IN REGARDS TO SHRUBS, NO SINGLE STEMMED OR THIN PLANTS WILL BE ACCEPTED. THE SIDE BRANCHES MUST BE GENEROUS AND WELL TWIGGED, AND THE PLANT AS A WHOLE MUST BE WELL BRANCHED TO THE GROUND. THE PLANTS MUST BE IN A VIGOROUS CONDITION, FREE FROM DEAD WOOD, BRUISES OR OTHER ROOT OR BRANCH INJURIES. 24.PLANTING SOIL MIX: PLANTING SOIL FOR BACKFILL SHALL BE A MIXTURE OF APPROVED LOAM AND SOIL AMENDMENTS MIXED MATERIAL SHALL BE PH TESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER, AND ADJUSTED ACCORDING TO PARTICULAR PLANTING APPLICATIONS, USING LIME OR SULFUR AS REQUIRED. FOR PLANTS THAT REQUIRE AN ACID SOIL, SUCH AS ERICACEOUS PLANTS AND BROAD-LEAVED EVERGREENS, PLANTING SOIL SHALL HAVE A TRUE PH OF 4.5 TO 5.5. PLANTING SOIL FOR ALL OTHER PLANTS SHALL HAVE A TRUE PH VALUE OF 6.0 TO 6.5. PROPOSED SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 25.BARK MULCH: BARK MULCH SHALL BE SHREDDED COMPOSTED PINE BARK MULCH, AGED BETWEEN 6 MONTHS UP TO 2 YEARS. MULCH SHALL BE PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED AND DARK BROWN IN COLOR. THE MULCH SHALL BE DARK BROWN IN COLOR, 100% ORGANIC, FREE OF CHUNKS AND PIECES OF WOOD THICKER THAN ¼ INCHES AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN, IN THE JUDGEMENT OF THE ENGINEER, AN EXCESS OF FINE PARTICLES. 26.WATER: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING THEIR OWN SUPPLY OF WATER TO THE SITE AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE PROJECT. ALL PLANTS INJURED OR DAMAGED DUE TO THE LACK OF WATER, OR DUE TO THE USE OF TOO MUCH WATER, SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CORRECT. WATER SHALL BE FREE FROM IMPURITIES INJURIOUS TO VEGETATION. WATER PLANTS THOROUGHLY AFTER INSTALLATION, A MINIMUM OF TWICE WITHIN THE FIRST 24 HOURS. 27.TREE WATERING BAGS: WHEN REQUIRED, PROVIDE SLOW-RELEASE DRIP TREE BAG SUCH AS “TREE GATOR”, “OOZE TUBE”, “TREE CAMEL BAG” OR APPROVED EQUAL (14 GALLON MIN. CAPACITY). PROVIDE ONE BAG FOR EACH INSTALLED TREE (DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREENS). COST OF DRIP TREE BAG SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PLANTING PRICE. AFTER INITIAL INSTALLATION, TREES SHALL BE WATERED VIA SLOW-RELEASE WATERING BAGS FILLED TWICE WEEKLY. SLOW-RELEASE WATERING BAGS SHALL RELEASE CONTAINED WATER VOLUME IN NO LESS THAN 4 HOURS. 28.SOIL MOISTURE MATS: WHEN REQUIRED, PROVIDE "TREEDIAPER" OR APPROVED EQUAL (36" DIAMETER PLASTIC FABRIC BAG CONTAINING POLYACRYLAMIDES WITH WATER STORAGE CAPACITY OF 15 GALLONS). COST OF SOIL MOISTURE MAT SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PLANTING PRICE. 29.SOIL WETTING AGENT: SOIL WETTING AGENT SHALL BE A SYNTHETIC, NON-TOXIC ACRYLIC POLYACRYLAMIDE OR NATURAL SOLUBLE PLANT EXTRACT. APPLICATION RATES SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 30.FUNGAL MYCORRHIZAE: EACH PLANT SHALL BE PLANTED WITH FUNGAL MYCORRHIZAE. MYCORRHIZAE SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST THREE SPECIES OF VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR (ENDOMYCCHORIZAL) FUNGI AS WELL AS ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI. MYCORRHIZAE SHALL BE SHIPPED IN INDIVIDUAL DOSAGE PACKETS. EXAMINATION OF CONDITIONS AND GENERAL NOTES: 1.LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND REPAIRING DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE COORDINATION WILL UTILITY COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES AND FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND PAYING ALL REQUIRED FEES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH M.G.L. , CHAPTER 82, SECTION 40, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS; CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN WRITING PRIOR TO SUCH EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO CALL "DIG SAFE" AT 1(888)344-7233 NO LEES THAN 72 HOURS (EXCLUSIVE OF SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO SUCH EXCAVATION. DOCUMENTATION OF REQUESTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION WORK. 2.THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING SITE FEATURES AS SHOWN HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM MAPS, SURVEYS, FIELD INSPECTIONS, AND OTHER AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THEY MUST BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE BOTH TO LOCATION, SIZE, AND AS-BUILT CONDITION AND ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. 3.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATION AND NATURE OF ALL SUBSURFACE UTILITIES AT THE PROJECT WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE WORK. COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY OWNERS AND PERFORM VERIFICATION OF TYPE, LOCATION AND INVERTS AS REQUIRED. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SECURITY AND JOB SAFETY. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA REGULATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. ABBREVIATIONS: L CENTER LINE BC BOTTOM OF CURB DIA DIAMETER EX EXISTING FC FLUSH CURB CONC CONCRETE MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM OC ON CENTER PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH TC TOP OF CURB TW TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL VIF VERIFY IN FIELD C SITE PREPARATION AND DEMOLITION 1.AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION NOT COVERED WITH BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR PAVEMENTS SHALL RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF LOAM AND SEED, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SEEDED EMBANKMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH EPA'S NPDES PERMITTING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED WITH APPLICABLE CITY DEPARTMENTS AND/OR OTHER AGENCIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE WORK. 5.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS AND FOOTINGS AS NOTED ON PLANS. MATERIALS ARE TO BE DISPOSED OF PER APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 6.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENTS TO REMAIN MEET NEW PAVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENTS IN A STRAIGHT LINE (PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT SITE ELEMENTS AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CLEAN CONNECTIONS TO NEW PAVEMENTS. L-102 LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/4/2022 1:49:23 PMLEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC TR / MH MH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 05/03/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 803 Summer St, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02127 617.896.4300 www.bscgroup.com L-202 L-402 L-201 L-401 SZET E L A L A N E FORT AVE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - SALEM CON COM SET 07/12/2022 \\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-DET.dwg DDDD78FORT AVENUELEE FORT TERRACET**SIDEWALK + FIRE LANEEASTWINGMULTI-USELAWNFRONT ENTRANCETERRACE(SITE FURNISHINGS ATPRIVATE COURTYARD TBD)BOCCE COURTSVICTORY GARDENWESTWINGGRILLING TERRACE(SITE FURNISHINGSAT PRIVATE TERRACETBD)C1C1B5B4B4B4B3C2C2C3C4C6C7C7C7C7C6C7L1L1L1L1C8L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1A1A1B1A1A1A3A4A2A2A2B1B1A2L1L1A5L1L1TYPTYPA5C8C6A2A2A2CONCRETE PAVING- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA2KEYMATERIALS LEGENDDESCRIPTIONBITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVING- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA1A3SYMBOLPAVING , WALLS + SITE FEATURESSHEETVERTICAL ROADWAY CURB- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSLIGHTINGL1LED LIGHT FIXTURE ON TIMBER POLE(FULL CUTOFF, DARK-SKY FRIENDLY FIXTURE)C1SITE FURNISHINGS WOOD BENCH (WITH ARMS AND BACKREST)PICNIC TABLE (WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE)L-301B1STABILIZED STONE DUST PAVINGC2B2REINFORCED TURF PAVINGPLANTINGNEW DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREESLANDSCAPE SHRUB + GROUNDCOVERPLANTING AREASEXISTING TREES TO REMAIN(PROTECT IN PLACE)NEW UNDERSTORY TREESORNAMENTAL STONE DRIP EDGEMEADOW PLANTING AREAS(4" LOAM + SEED)RAINGARDEN PLANTING AREAS(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)LAWN AREA(6" LOAM + SEED)SHADE PLANTING AREAS(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-501L-501L-501L-501CAFE TABLE (4 SEATS)C3L-501WOOD BIKE RACKC4L-501TRASH + RECYCLING RECEPTACLESC6L-501DOG WASTE BAG DISPENSERC7L-501C8L-501TIMBER HAMMOCK POSTPUBLIC ART/SCULPTURE LOCATION(ART SELECTION BY OTHERS)C9LANDSCAPE BOULDERL-501B3B4BOULDER RETAINING WALLL-501CAFE TABLE (WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE)L-501C10BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVING WITHINTEGRAL COLOR - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA4STAMPED CONCRETE PAVING- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA5ARMCHAIR SEATING WITH SIDE TABLEL-501B5*L-502SHEET L-202MATCHLINESHEET L -201L-201LANDSCAPEMATERIALSPLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLE3/4/2022 1:49:23 PM LEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCTR / MHMHMARKDATEDESCRIPTION05/03/2022SALEM CON COM SETSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"NPROJECT BOUNDARY803 Summer St, 3rd FloorBoston, MA 02127617.896.4300www.bscgroup.comL-202L-402L-201L-401SZETELA LANEFORT AVEFOR PERMITTING PURPOSES- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -010'20'40'SALEM CON COM SET07/12/2022\\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-LM.dwg DDSZETELA LANE*******NEW BIKE PATH*SIDEWALK + FIRE LANEEASTWINGMULTI-USELAWNWESTWINGC1C1C1C1B5B5B5B5B5B5B5B4B4B4B4B4B3C2C3C4C6C7C7C7C6C7C7C7C9C9C10L1L1C8L1L1L1L1L1L1L1C8L1L1L1L1B1B2A1A2A2A2B1B2A2A5L1TYPTYPOF 11L1L1L1L1TYPTYPB1TYPTYPL1C8SIDEWALK + FIRE LANEA2B1TYPC8C6A2A2A2CONCRETE PAVING- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA2KEYMATERIALS LEGENDDESCRIPTIONBITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVING- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA1A3SYMBOLPAVING , WALLS + SITE FEATURESSHEETVERTICAL ROADWAY CURB- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSLIGHTINGL1LED LIGHT FIXTURE ON TIMBER POLE(FULL CUTOFF, DARK-SKY FRIENDLY FIXTURE)C1SITE FURNISHINGS WOOD BENCH (WITH ARMS AND BACKREST)PICNIC TABLE (WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE)L-301B1STABILIZED STONE DUST PAVINGC2B2REINFORCED TURF PAVINGPLANTINGNEW DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREESLANDSCAPE SHRUB + GROUNDCOVERPLANTING AREASEXISTING TREES TO REMAIN(PROTECT IN PLACE)NEW UNDERSTORY TREESORNAMENTAL STONE DRIP EDGEMEADOW PLANTING AREAS(4" LOAM + SEED)RAINGARDEN PLANTING AREAS(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)LAWN AREA(6" LOAM + SEED)SHADE PLANTING AREAS(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-502L-501L-501L-501L-501CAFE TABLE (4 SEATS)C3L-501WOOD BIKE RACKC4L-501TRASH + RECYCLING RECEPTACLESC6L-501DOG WASTE BAG DISPENSERC7L-501C8L-501TIMBER HAMMOCK POSTPUBLIC ART/SCULPTURE LOCATION(ART SELECTION BY OTHERS)C9LANDSCAPE BOULDERL-501B3B4BOULDER RETAINING WALLL-501CAFE TABLE (WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE)L-501C10BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVING WITHINTEGRAL COLOR - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA4STAMPED CONCRETE PAVING- SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSA5ARMCHAIR SEATING WITH SIDE TABLEL-501B5*L-502SHEET L -202MATCHLINESHEET L -201L-202LANDSCAPEMATERIALSPLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLE3/4/2022 1:49:23 PM LEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCTR / MHMHMARKDATEDESCRIPTION05/03/2022SALEM CON COM SETSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"NPROJECT BOUNDARY803 Summer St, 3rd FloorBoston, MA 02127617.896.4300www.bscgroup.comL-202L-402L-201L-401SZETELA LANEFORT AVEFOR PERMITTING PURPOSES- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -010'20'40'SALEM CON COM SET07/12/2022\\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-LM.dwg LED LIGHT POLE FIXTURE ON TIMBER POLEL1not to scale TYPE B TIMBER POLE not to scale TYPE A, C, AND D TIMBER POLE not to scale PROVIDE 2200K COLOR TEMPERATURE AT PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE AREA PROVIDE 2700K COLOR TEMPERATURE AT RESIDENTIAL COURTYARD AREAS LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC AND LAYOUT PLAN not to scale L-301 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN AND DETAILS ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/4/2022 1:49:23 PMLEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC TR / MH MH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 05/03/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 803 Summer St, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02127 617.896.4300 www.bscgroup.com L-202 L-402 L-201 L-401 SZET E L A L A N E FORT AVE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - SALEM CON COM SET 07/12/2022 \\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-DET.dwg FORT AVENUELEE FORT TERRACET**3 AG3 HV1 AG3 CV1 MA5 PMA3 PHO23 DEC33 JUC13 RHA3 BAA5 ECP5 ECP5 ECP5 ECP3 BAA3 BAA5 ECP3 BAA5 ECP5 ECP9 SYA3 VID3 CSV3 CSV17 RHA7 BAA24 ECP1 NS1 NS1 NS1 NS3 VL5 MYP3 MYP3 MYP3 VAC151 SCS3 ILV26 CEA32 RHA23 JUC11 ECP79 DEC21 ECP6 BAA19 ECP30 DEC36 DEC20 CEA7 BAA30 DEC9 ECP20 DEC10 ECP27 DEC2 AR1 AR1 AR1 BP3 PMA1 BP3 CLA3 PHO1 SM1 BP2 AA9 ILG3 PHO5 CLA1 MYP6 VAA1 MYP3 VL1 AA1 MYP1 CC1 MYP1 MYP3 VL3 CC1 CV1 AL1 LT1 AL1 AL3 BAA18 DEC3 BAA17 DEC6 MYP5 HYA6 CAA3 BAA5 VID10 CJ3 BAA4 BAA37 SCS29 JUC4 BAA88 RHA28 CEA4 BAA9 HYA1 BP5 ILV2 ILJ33 CEA30 RHA4 BP5 ILO7 HYA7 ARA1 LT3 TA3 CLV3 CLV8 CSV3 VID9 HEV9 HEV3 VID5 CSV6 HYA11 CSV6 ARA5 HYA1 HV5 CSV8 JUC7 JUC13 CEA1 HS1 AF16 RHA1 HS24 DEC1 HV1 AF1 HS4 ILV2 ILJ13 RHA3 ILV5 CSV41 HEV7 SYA1 AF53 CAP53 CAP1 AF7 SYA25 JUC47 CEA15 RHA7 JUC15 HEV52 CAP14 JUC1 AF1 AF1 AF9 HT26 CAP12 JUC5 ARA27 HEV5 ARA3 VID32 POB5 CSV26 HEV5 ARA12 HEV43 WAF44 WAF44 WAF46 WAF3 HYA4 VID3 HYA41 POB7 MYP4 CAA3 MYP5 VID9 SYA11 CSV6 RHA11 RHA2 HS8 JUC14 HEV21 POB8 SCS12 CSV4 BAA17 ECP3 BAA15 CEA13 DEC9 CAA7 VAC3 MYP9 ARA9 HYA9 ARA10 CAA3 VID6 VACDECIDUOUSTREESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTCALAF7ACER FREEMANII 'ARMSTRONG'COLUMNAR ARMSTRONG RED MAPLEB & B3"CALAR4ACER RUBRUM 'RED SUNSET'RED SUNSET RED MAPLEB & B2.5"CALBP11BETULA POPULIFOLIAGRAY BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKB & B7-8` HT.CJ10CARPINUS CAROLINIANA 'J.N. UPRIGHT' TMFIRESPIRE MULTI-TRUNK AMERICAN HORNBEAMB & B3"CALHT9HALESIA TETRAPTERACAROLINA SILVERBELLB & B2.5"CALLT3LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERATULIP POPLARB & B2.5"CALMA1MAGNOLIA ACUMINATACUCUMBERTREE MAGNOLIAB & B2.5"CALNS15NYSSA SYLVATICATUPELOB & B3"CALQA7QUERCUS ALBAWHITE OAKB & B3"CALTA3TILIA AMERICANAAMERICAN LINDENB & B3"CALUNDERSTORYTREESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTCALAA17AMELANCHIER ARBOREADOWNY SERVICEBERRYB & B7-8` HT.AG4AMELANCHIER CANADENSISCANADIAN SERVICEBERRYB & B7-8` HT.AL3AMELANCHIER LAEVISALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRYB & B6-7` HTCV4CHIONANTHUS VIRGINICUSWHITE FRINGETREE10 GALCC6CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMISTHORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN10 GALHS5HAMAMELIS VERNALISOZARK WITCHHAZEL10 GALHV5HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANACOMMON WITCH HAZEL10 GALSM7SAMBUCUS CANADENSISAMERICAN ELDERBERRY10 GALSA3SASSAFRAS ALBIDUMSASSAFRASB & B4`-5` HT.VL12VIBURNUM LENTAGONANNYBERRY10 GALSHRUBSQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTHT.ARA46ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIARED CHOKEBERRY3 GALCAA30CALLICARPA AMERICANAAMERICAN BEAUTYBERRY3 GALCLV6CLEMATIS VIRGINIANAVIRGINS BOWERTRELLISED18"HTMINCLA28CLETHRA ALNIFOLIASUMMERSWEET3 GALCSV68CORNUS SERICEA 'VARIEGATA'VARIEGATED RED TWIG DOGWOOD3 GALHYA47HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENSSMOOTH HYDRANGEA / WILD HYDRANGEA5 GALILG14ILEX GLABRA 'COMPACTA'COMPACT INKBERRY3 GALILO5ILEX OPACAAMERICAN HOLLY5 GALILV15ILEX VERTICILLATAWINTERBERRY3 GALILJ4ILEX VERTICILLATA 'JIM DANDY'JIM DANDY WINTERBERRY3 GALMYP35MYRICA PENSYLVANICANORTHERN BAYBERRY5 GALPHO12PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUSNINEBARK5 GALPMA17PRUNUS MARITIMABEACH PLUM5 GALSYA32SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUSCOMMON WHITE SNOWBERRY3 GALVAA18VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUMLOWBUSH BLUEBERRY3 GALVAC29VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUMHIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY5 GALVID29VIBURNUM DENTATUMVIBURNUM5 GALGROUNDCOVERS,PERENNIALS +ORNAMENTALGRASSESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTBAA66BAPTISIA AUSTRALISBLUE WILD INDIGO1 GAL30" o.c.CAP184CAREX PENSYLVANICAPENNSYLVANIA SEDGE1 GAL18" o.c.CEA182CEANOTHUS AMERICANUS L.NEW JERSEY TEA2 GAL30" o.c.DEC317DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSATUFTED HAIR GRASS3 GAL24" o.c.ECP146ECHINACEA PALLIDAPALE PURPLE CONEFLOWER1 GAL24" o.c.HEV200HEUCHERA VILLOSAHAIRY ALUMROOT3 GAL24" o.c.JUC177JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS VAR. DEPRESSACOMMON JUNIPER3 GAL30" o.c.POB94POLYGONATUM BIFLORUMSOLOMON'S SEAL3 GAL30" o.c.RHA241RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW'GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC3 GAL36" o.c.SCS196SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUMLITTLE BLUESTEM1 GAL36" o.c.WAF177WALDSTEINIA FRAGARIOIDESAPPALACHIAN BARREN STRAWBERRY4"POT18" o.c.PLANT SCHEDULEEXISTING TREES TO REMAIN - PROTECT IN PLACEADJACENT EXISTING TREES (OFF PROPERTY ) TO REMAIN IN PLACESEED MIX TYPE 1 - DRY AREASMEADOW PLANTING AREAS* (4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·SHOWY NORTHEAST NATIVE WILDFLOWER MIX - ERNMX-153-1·XERCES NORTHEAST POLLINATOR MIX - XERC00103·NORTHEAST ANNUAL + PERENNIAL WILDFLOWER MIX - ERNMX -168SEED MIX TYPE 2 - DRY AREASMEADOW ACCENT PLANTING AREAS* (4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·BUTTERFLY + HUMMINGBIRD GARDEN MIX - ERNMX-179·NORTHEAST ANNUAL + PERENNIAL WILDFLOWER MIX - ERNMX -168SEED MIX TYPE 3 - DRY TO WET AREASDEPRESSED SWALE PLANTING AREAS* - LESS THAN 12" DEPTH WITH UNDERDRAIN)*(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA·DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA·SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM·MESIC TO DRY NATIVE POLLINATOR MIX WITHOUT GRASSES - ERNMX -125·WARM SEASON GRASS MIX- ERNMX 117SEED MIX TYPE 4 - DRY TO WET AREASRAINGARDEN PLANTING AREAS - EDGES - LESS THAN 12" DEPTH*(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)NOTE: DO NOT PROVIDE UNDERDRAIN IF SOILS INFILTRATION IS GREATER THAN OR EQUALTO .5 INCHES PER HOUR AND 18" OF WATER INFILTRATES OVER A 24 HOUR PERIOD.PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·MESIC TO DRY NATIVE POLLINATOR MIX WITHOUT GRASSES - ERNMX -125·FACW WETLAND MEADOW MIX - ERNMX 122·OBL-FACW PERENNIAL FOOD + COVER WETLAND MIX - ERNMX 120·BUTTERFLY + HUMMINGBIRD GARDEN MIX - ERNMX-179·DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA·SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUMSEED MIX TYPE 5 - DRY SHADE AREASSHADE PLANTING AREAS* (4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·SEED MIX ENHANCEMENT FOR A SHADY WOODLAND·SHADY WOODLAND SEED MIX*SEED MIX NOTES1.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THAT OVERSEEDING (2 APPLICATIONS OF SEED MIXES DURINGSUBSEQUENT SEASONS) MAY BE NECESSARY FOR PERENNIAL AND GRASS ESTABLISHMENT.2.MEADOW SEED MIXES SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS, PRAIRIE MOON NATIVENURSERY (FOR SHADE SEED MIXES ONLY) OR HOFFMAN NURSERY (FOR DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA ONLY).FESCUE BLENDS (RED OR TALL FESCUES PER LINE 6 BELOW) MAY BE ADDED UP TO 30% OF MEADOWSEED MIX FOR EARLY ESTABLISHMENT OF MEADOW AREAS.3.FINAL SEED MIX SHALL BE DETERMINED BY PLANTING SEASON, SOIL TESTS TAKEN WITHIN 1 YEAR OFANTICIPATED PLANTING, AND CONSULTATION WITH SEED SUPPLIER, WETLAND SCIENTIST ANDLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.4.ANNUAL RYE MAY BE ADDED AS A COVER CROP FOR INITIAL SEED ESTABLISHMENT. DETERMINATIONSHALL BE MADE BASED ON LINE ITEM #2 ABOVE.5.THE PROVISION OF LOAM AND/OR COMPOST WITH SEED MIXES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY SOIL TESTSTAKEN WITHIN 1 YEAR OF ANTICIPATED PLANTING.6.LAWN SEED MIXES (AT MULTI-USE LAWN AND VEHICULAR LAWN AREAS) SHALL BE LOW MOW OR NO MOW(DROUGHT-TOLERANT) TALL FESCUE BLENDS AS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTORSHALL INCLUDE MICROCLOVER OR MINICLOVER (TRIFOLIUM REPENS) SEED AS A NITROGEN FIXER ATLAWN AREAS. SEED RATE SHALL BE 1/2-1 LB PER 1,000 SF. APPROVABLE BLENDS INCLUDE THEFOLLOWING:· VIGORO, TALL FESCUE BLEND (AVAILABLE AT HOME DEPOT AT TIME OF PRINTING)· NO MOW LAWN SEED MIX (BY PRAIRIE NURSERY)· PEARLS PREMIUM· PENNINGTON, KENTUCKY 31 TALL FESCUE· REBELS, TALL FESCUE MIX· BARENBRUG TURF TYPE TALL FESCUE WITH RTF· BLACK BEAUTY, TURF TYPE TALL FESCUE WITH RTFLAWN AREASEE NOTE 6 FOR ACCEPTABLE SEED MIXES6" LOAM + SEEDVEHICULAR LAWN AREA(REINFORCED TURF PAVING ADJACENT FIRE LANE ACCESS)SEE NOTE 6 FOR ACCEPTABLE SEED MIXES6" LOAM + SEEDSEEDED AREASSHEET L-402MATCHLINESHEET L-401L-401LANDSCAPEPLANTINGPLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLE3/4/2022 1:49:23 PM LEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCTR / MHMHMARKDATEDESCRIPTION05/03/2022SALEM CON COM SETSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"NPROJECT BOUNDARY803 Summer St, 3rd FloorBoston, MA 02127617.896.4300www.bscgroup.comL-202L-402L-201L-401SZETELA LANEFORT AVEFOR PERMITTING PURPOSES- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -010'20'40'SALEM CON COM SET07/12/2022\\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-PLNT.dwg SZETELA LANE********3 NS3 AG3 HV1 AG3 CV1 MA5 PMA3 PHO23 DEC13 RHA3 BAA5 ECP5 ECP5 ECP5 ECP3 BAA3 BAA3 AA3 SM5 MYP3 MYP3 MYP3 VAC1 SA151 SCS3 ILV2 AR6 AA1 SA5 VAC3 PMA5 VAC1 NS1 NS1 NS1 CC1 CC2 NS1 BP3 PMA2 AA6 CLA1 QA1 NS1 BP1 AA6 CLA1 BP1 AA1 SA1 NS4 VAA5 ILG1 NS1 AA3 CLA3 PHO3 VL1 BP3 PMA1 BP3 CLA3 PHO1 SM1 BP2 AA9 ILG3 PHO5 CLA1 MYP6 VAA1 MYP3 VL1 AA1 MYP1 CC1 MYP1 MYP3 VL5 CLA8 VAA3 PMA3 VAC4 QA3 SM3 CC1 CV3 BAA18 DEC3 BAA17 DEC6 MYP5 HYA6 CAA3 BAA5 VID10 CJ3 BAA4 BAA37 SCS29 JUC4 BAA88 RHA28 CEA4 BAA9 HYA1 BP5 ILV2 ILJ33 CEA30 RHA4 BP3 TA3 CLV8 CSV3 VID9 HEV9 HEV3 VID5 CSV6 HYA11 CSV6 ARA5 HYA1 HV5 CSV8 JUC7 JUC13 CEA1 HS1 AF16 RHA1 HS24 DEC1 HV1 AF1 HS4 ILV2 ILJ13 RHA3 ILV5 CSV41 HEV7 SYA1 AF53 CAP53 CAP1 AF7 SYA25 JUC47 CEA15 RHA7 JUC15 HEV52 CAP14 JUC1 AF5 CSV5 ARADECIDUOUSTREESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTCALAF7ACER FREEMANII 'ARMSTRONG'COLUMNAR ARMSTRONG RED MAPLEB & B3"CALAR4ACER RUBRUM 'RED SUNSET'RED SUNSET RED MAPLEB & B2.5"CALBP11BETULA POPULIFOLIAGRAY BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKB & B7-8` HT.CJ10CARPINUS CAROLINIANA 'J.N. UPRIGHT' TMFIRESPIRE MULTI-TRUNK AMERICAN HORNBEAMB & B3"CALHT9HALESIA TETRAPTERACAROLINA SILVERBELLB & B2.5"CALLT3LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERATULIP POPLARB & B2.5"CALMA1MAGNOLIA ACUMINATACUCUMBERTREE MAGNOLIAB & B2.5"CALNS15NYSSA SYLVATICATUPELOB & B3"CALQA7QUERCUS ALBAWHITE OAKB & B3"CALTA3TILIA AMERICANAAMERICAN LINDENB & B3"CALUNDERSTORYTREESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTCALAA17AMELANCHIER ARBOREADOWNY SERVICEBERRYB & B7-8` HT.AG4AMELANCHIER CANADENSISCANADIAN SERVICEBERRYB & B7-8` HT.AL3AMELANCHIER LAEVISALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRYB & B6-7` HTCV4CHIONANTHUS VIRGINICUSWHITE FRINGETREE10 GALCC6CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMISTHORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN10 GALHS5HAMAMELIS VERNALISOZARK WITCHHAZEL10 GALHV5HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANACOMMON WITCH HAZEL10 GALSM7SAMBUCUS CANADENSISAMERICAN ELDERBERRY10 GALSA3SASSAFRAS ALBIDUMSASSAFRASB & B4`-5` HT.VL12VIBURNUM LENTAGONANNYBERRY10 GALSHRUBSQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTHT.ARA46ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIARED CHOKEBERRY3 GALCAA30CALLICARPA AMERICANAAMERICAN BEAUTYBERRY3 GALCLV6CLEMATIS VIRGINIANAVIRGINS BOWERTRELLISED18"HTMINCLA28CLETHRA ALNIFOLIASUMMERSWEET3 GALCSV68CORNUS SERICEA 'VARIEGATA'VARIEGATED RED TWIG DOGWOOD3 GALHYA47HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENSSMOOTH HYDRANGEA / WILD HYDRANGEA5 GALILG14ILEX GLABRA 'COMPACTA'COMPACT INKBERRY3 GALILO5ILEX OPACAAMERICAN HOLLY5 GALILV15ILEX VERTICILLATAWINTERBERRY3 GALILJ4ILEX VERTICILLATA 'JIM DANDY'JIM DANDY WINTERBERRY3 GALMYP35MYRICA PENSYLVANICANORTHERN BAYBERRY5 GALPHO12PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUSNINEBARK5 GALPMA17PRUNUS MARITIMABEACH PLUM5 GALSYA32SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUSCOMMON WHITE SNOWBERRY3 GALVAA18VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUMLOWBUSH BLUEBERRY3 GALVAC29VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUMHIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY5 GALVID29VIBURNUM DENTATUMVIBURNUM5 GALGROUNDCOVERS,PERENNIALS +ORNAMENTALGRASSESQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECONTBAA66BAPTISIA AUSTRALISBLUE WILD INDIGO1 GAL30" o.c.CAP184CAREX PENSYLVANICAPENNSYLVANIA SEDGE1 GAL18" o.c.CEA182CEANOTHUS AMERICANUS L.NEW JERSEY TEA2 GAL30" o.c.DEC317DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSATUFTED HAIR GRASS3 GAL24" o.c.ECP146ECHINACEA PALLIDAPALE PURPLE CONEFLOWER1 GAL24" o.c.HEV200HEUCHERA VILLOSAHAIRY ALUMROOT3 GAL24" o.c.JUC177JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS VAR. DEPRESSACOMMON JUNIPER3 GAL30" o.c.POB94POLYGONATUM BIFLORUMSOLOMON'S SEAL3 GAL30" o.c.RHA241RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW'GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC3 GAL36" o.c.SCS196SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUMLITTLE BLUESTEM1 GAL36" o.c.WAF177WALDSTEINIA FRAGARIOIDESAPPALACHIAN BARREN STRAWBERRY4"POT18" o.c.PLANT SCHEDULEEXISTING TREES TO REMAIN - PROTECT IN PLACEADJACENT EXISTING TREES (OFF PROPERTY ) TO REMAIN IN PLACESEED MIX TYPE 1 - DRY AREASMEADOW PLANTING AREAS* (4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·SHOWY NORTHEAST NATIVE WILDFLOWER MIX - ERNMX-153-1·XERCES NORTHEAST POLLINATOR MIX - XERC00103·NORTHEAST ANNUAL + PERENNIAL WILDFLOWER MIX - ERNMX -168SEED MIX TYPE 2 - DRY AREASMEADOW ACCENT PLANTING AREAS* (4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·BUTTERFLY + HUMMINGBIRD GARDEN MIX - ERNMX-179·NORTHEAST ANNUAL + PERENNIAL WILDFLOWER MIX - ERNMX -168SEED MIX TYPE 3 - DRY TO WET AREASDEPRESSED SWALE PLANTING AREAS* - LESS THAN 12" DEPTH WITH UNDERDRAIN)*(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA·DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA·SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM·MESIC TO DRY NATIVE POLLINATOR MIX WITHOUT GRASSES - ERNMX -125·WARM SEASON GRASS MIX- ERNMX 117SEED MIX TYPE 4 - DRY TO WET AREASRAINGARDEN PLANTING AREAS - EDGES - LESS THAN 12" DEPTH*(4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)NOTE: DO NOT PROVIDE UNDERDRAIN IF SOILS INFILTRATION IS GREATER THAN OR EQUALTO .5 INCHES PER HOUR AND 18" OF WATER INFILTRATES OVER A 24 HOUR PERIOD.PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·MESIC TO DRY NATIVE POLLINATOR MIX WITHOUT GRASSES - ERNMX -125·FACW WETLAND MEADOW MIX - ERNMX 122·OBL-FACW PERENNIAL FOOD + COVER WETLAND MIX - ERNMX 120·BUTTERFLY + HUMMINGBIRD GARDEN MIX - ERNMX-179·DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA·SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUMSEED MIX TYPE 5 - DRY SHADE AREASSHADE PLANTING AREAS* (4" LOAM OR COMPOST + SEED)PROVIDE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:·SEED MIX ENHANCEMENT FOR A SHADY WOODLAND·SHADY WOODLAND SEED MIXSEEDED AREASLAWN AREASEE NOTE 6 FOR ACCEPTABLE SEED MIXES6" LOAM + SEEDVEHICULAR LAWN AREA(REINFORCED TURF PAVING ADJACENT FIRE LANE ACCESS)SEE NOTE 6 FOR ACCEPTABLE SEED MIXES6" LOAM + SEED*SEED MIX NOTES1.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THAT OVERSEEDING (2 APPLICATIONS OF SEED MIXES DURINGSUBSEQUENT SEASONS) MAY BE NECESSARY FOR PERENNIAL AND GRASS ESTABLISHMENT.2.MEADOW SEED MIXES SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS, PRAIRIE MOON NATIVENURSERY (FOR SHADE SEED MIXES ONLY) OR HOFFMAN NURSERY (FOR DESCHAMPSIA FLEXUOSA ONLY).FESCUE BLENDS (RED OR TALL FESCUES PER LINE 6 BELOW) MAY BE ADDED UP TO 30% OF MEADOWSEED MIX FOR EARLY ESTABLISHMENT OF MEADOW AREAS.3.FINAL SEED MIX SHALL BE DETERMINED BY PLANTING SEASON, SOIL TESTS TAKEN WITHIN 1 YEAR OFANTICIPATED PLANTING, AND CONSULTATION WITH SEED SUPPLIER, WETLAND SCIENTIST ANDLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.4.ANNUAL RYE MAY BE ADDED AS A COVER CROP FOR INITIAL SEED ESTABLISHMENT. DETERMINATIONSHALL BE MADE BASED ON LINE ITEM #2 ABOVE.5.THE PROVISION OF LOAM AND/OR COMPOST WITH SEED MIXES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY SOIL TESTSTAKEN WITHIN 1 YEAR OF ANTICIPATED PLANTING.6.LAWN SEED MIXES (AT MULTI-USE LAWN AND VEHICULAR LAWN AREAS) SHALL BE LOW MOW OR NO MOW(DROUGHT-TOLERANT) TALL FESCUE BLENDS AS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTORSHALL INCLUDE MICROCLOVER OR MINICLOVER (TRIFOLIUM REPENS) SEED AS A NITROGEN FIXER ATLAWN AREAS. SEED RATE SHALL BE 1/2-1 LB PER 1,000 SF. APPROVABLE BLENDS INCLUDE THEFOLLOWING:· VIGORO, TALL FESCUE BLEND (AVAILABLE AT HOME DEPOT AT TIME OF PRINTING)· NO MOW LAWN SEED MIX (BY PRAIRIE NURSERY)· PEARLS PREMIUM· PENNINGTON, KENTUCKY 31 TALL FESCUE· REBELS, TALL FESCUE MIX· BARENBRUG TURF TYPE TALL FESCUE WITH RTF· BLACK BEAUTY, TURF TYPE TALL FESCUE WITH RTFSHEET L -402MATCHLINESHEET L -401L-402LANDSCAPEPLANTINGPLANARCHITECTCONSULTANTSTAMPKEY PLANPROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET TITLE3/4/2022 1:49:23 PM LEEFORTTERRACE220024SALEM, MABEACON COMMUNITIES, LLCTR / MHMHMARKDATEDESCRIPTION05/03/2022SALEM CON COM SETSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"NPROJECT BOUNDARY803 Summer St, 3rd FloorBoston, MA 02127617.896.4300www.bscgroup.comL-202L-402L-201L-401SZETELA LANEFORT AVEFOR PERMITTING PURPOSES- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -010'20'40'SALEM CON COM SET07/12/2022\\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-PLNT.dwg STABILIZED STONE DUST PAVINGB1not to scale STABILIZED STONE DUST PAVING 4"6"6" COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE (M.2.01.3) NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL) EXISTING SUBGRADE OR COMPACTED ORDINARY FILL NOTE: CROSS SLOPES MAY NOT EXCEED 1.5%PROVIDE PERMALOC METAL EDGING WHERE STONE DUST PAVING ABUTS LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS ENLARGEMENT 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY TURF RINGS ATTACH WITH (1/4") ABOVE TOP OF RING TOP OF GRASS ROOT MASS 6 MM BASE COURSE COMPACTED SANDY GRAVEL TURF RINGS ROOT MASS TO FILL SNAP-FIT FASTENERS COMPACTED SUBGRADE, RINGS FILLED WITH CONCRETE SAND (CLEAN, SHARP SAND) COMPACTED SANDY GRAVEL SEE ENLARGEMENT ABOVE REINFORCED TURF PAVINGB2not to scale ANCHOR BOLTS WITH SLEEVES AND WASHERS - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION WOOD BENCH (WITH ARMS AND BACKREST) C1 not to scale WOOD BENCH WOOD BIKE RACKC7not to scale NOTES: 1.PRECEDENT IMAGES SHOWN ABOVE SHALL SERVE AS A BASIS FOR DESIGN. 2.FINAL DESIGN SHALL INCORPORATE DOMESTIC HARDWOOD OR SALVAGED WOOD AND SALVAGED METAL COMPONENTS. SALVAGED COMPONENTS SHALL HAVE NO BURRS OR SPLINTERS AND SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN SITE FURNISHINGS. NOTES: 1.PRECEDENT IMAGE SHOWN ABOVE SHALL SERVE AS A BASIS FOR DESIGN. 2.FINAL DESIGN SHALL INCORPORATE SMOOTH SURFACED SALVAGED WOOD (FREE FROM SPLINTERS) , DOMESTIC HARDWOOD OR DOMESTIC THERMALLY MODIFIED HARDWOOD. 3.PROVIDE BENCH WITH BACKREST AND ARMRESTS BOULDERS PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLANS - COORDINATE PLACEMENT AND ROTATION IN FIELD WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER FINSHED GRADE VARIES - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS NOTES: 1.INSTALL BOULDERS WITH WEATHERED FACE EXPOSED AND A MINIMUM OF 1/3 OF THE STONE BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2.BOULDERS SHALL BE A NATURAL WEATHERED SURFACE ROCK. 3.SIZE RANGE: 3'-5' OVERALL SIZE.2/31/3BOULDER RETAINING WALLB4not to scale LANDSCAPE BOULDERB3not to scale COMPACTED SUBGRADE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE MAX. 4V:1H BATTER NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ROCK FACE DEVIATION ≤6" FROM AVERAGE FACE OF WALL 12" MIN. OF 4"- SCREENED CRUSHED STONE NOTES: 1.STONE SIZES ·LENGTH - 48" MAX, 24" MIN. ·HEIGHT - 48" MAX, 12" MIN. 2.GAPS >6" SHALL BE CHINKED WITH ROCK SPALLS FROM WALL BOULDERS. CHINKING ROCKS SHALL NOT PROVIDE PRIMARY SUPPORT. GAPS >12" SHALL BE AVOIDED. 3.BOULDERS SHALL BE STACKED IN A RUNNING BOND PATTERN, WITH NO CONTINUOUS VERTICAL JOINTS. BASE COURSE BURIED 1/2 HEIGHT OF BASE BOULDERS BENTONITE IMPERVIOUS LAYER 6" PERFORATED HDPE UNDERDRAIN WRAPPED IN WOVEN FILTER FABRIC 4" PERFORATE HDPE STANDPIPE WRAPPED IN WOVEN FILTER FABRIC (6' 0.C.) (REFER TO GRADING PLAN) SECTION CAFE TABLEC4not to scale 78 1/2"17 1/4"PLAN VIEW - 4 SEAT METAL TABLE 42" C3 REFER TO LAYOUT PLAN FOR 3-SEAT (WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE) AND 4-SEAT TABLE LOCATIONS 78 1/2"17 1/4"42" PLAN VIEW - 3 SEAT WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE TABLE 18"30"1'-0"8"SECTION AT CONCRETE PAVING 6" SEAT POST (24" MIN LENGTH) TABLE POST (36" MIN LENGTH) COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE 4,000 PSI CONCRETE FOUNDATION AXONOMETRIC VIEW LASER CUT (PERFORATED) GAME TABLE TOP 4'-0"1'-0" NOTES: INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. PET WASTE TRANSMITS DISEASE LEASH AND CLEAN UP AFTER YOUR PET PLEASE KEEP THIS AREA CLEAN 6"6'-0"12" x18" ALUM. DOGIPOT STATION ON-LEASH SIGN 15.5"x 9.4"x 3.25" POWDER COATED ALUM. DOGIPOT JUNIOR BAG DISPENSER WITH INSTRUCTIONS, TWO DISPENSER SLOTS, AND LOCKING ACCESS PANEL 2"x2" SQ. GALV. STEEL MOUNTING POST; INCLUDE MOUNTING HARDWARE SET TOP OF FOOTING BELOW PAVEMENT 4,000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE CONCRETE SIDEWALK; SEE DETAIL FINISH GRADE ARMCHAIR SEATING WITH SIDE TABLEC5not to scale TIMBER HAMMOCK POSTC10not to scale PICNIC TABLE (WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE) C2 not to scale NOTES: 1.PRECEDENT IMAGE SHOWN ABOVE SHALL SERVE AS A BASIS FOR DESIGN. 2.FINAL PRODUCT SHALL BE COMPRISED OF CEDAR, TEAK, OR DOMESTIC HARDWOOD. TEAK WOOD SHALL HAVE FSC OR OR OTHER APPROVABLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY FROM A SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE. 3.ANCHOR TABLE WITH VANDAL RESISTANT SCREWS TO CONCRETE FOUNDATION OR GALVANIZED STEEL CABLE (3/8" MINIMUM THICKNESS) AND GALVANIZED EYE BOLT. ANCHOR GALVANIZED EYE BOLD TO CONCRETE WITH NON-SHRINK EPOXY GROUT. LASER CUT (PERFORATED) GAME TABLE TOP 8'-0"6'-0"5'-0"DOG WASTE BAG DISPENSERC9not to scale 4'-0"6"1'-0"NOTES: 1.PROVIDE CEDAR OR SALVAGED HARDWOOD (SUITABLE FOR OUTDOOR INSTALLATION) TIMBER POST GALVANIZED STEEL CLOTHESLINE HOOK CLEAN WASHED STONE BASE 4,000 PSI CONCRETE COLLAR - PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE FINISH GRADE 1'-6" 6"2'-8"31"2'-2"6" 6"1'-0"1'-0"6"CONCRETE PAVING, THICKEN PAVING AT ANCHOR LOCATIONS8"COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW BASE (M 1.03.0 C) COMPACTED SUBGRADE PLAN VIEW PRECEDENT IMAGE SIDE TABLE1'-10"TRASH + RECYCLING RECEPTACLESC8not to scale NOTES: 1.PROVIDE 1 TRASH AND 1 RECYCLING RECEPTACLE AT LOCATIONS NOTED ON PLAN. 2.OVERALL DIMENSIONS: 24"W X 24"D X 33"H. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 22 GALLON LINERS FOR EACH RECEPTACLE 3.MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADE A RED CEDAR WOOD. METAL SIDE TABLE - EMBEDDED MOUNT CONCRETE FOUNDATION 4,000 PSI MIN FINISH GRADE ARMCHAIR THREADED ANCHOR ROD L-501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/4/2022 1:49:23 PMLEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC TR / MH MH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 05/03/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 803 Summer St, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02127 617.896.4300 www.bscgroup.com L-202 L-402 L-201 L-401 SZET E L A L A N E FORT AVE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - SALEM CON COM SET 07/12/2022 \\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-DET.dwg LAWN SEED MIX FINISH GRADE LOAM TILLED & COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1.SEE SPECIFICATION FOR SEED MIX APPLICATION AND PLANTING MEDIUM PREPARATION. 2.WHERE LAWN HYDRO-SEEDING IS NOT EMPLOYED (EROSION CONTROL AREAS) SHALL BE RAKED TO LOOSEN SOILS. TOP DRESS WITH 1" OF COMPOST OR LOAM. SPREAD SEED AND STARTER FERTILIZER. ROLL THE ENTIRE SURFACE TO BOND SEED TO SOIL SURFACE. 3.HYDROSEED SLOPES GREATER THAN 20%. LAWN (LOAM AND SEED) CONTAINER GROWN SHRUB/PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOTE: 1. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 2. SAUCER SHALL BE FLOODED TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. ROOT BALL SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE PLANTING SOIL SEE SPECIFICATIONS COMPLETELY REMOVE BURLAP, LACING AND WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 1/2 OF THE ROOTBALL COMPACTED SUBGRADE EDGE OF 3" HIGH WATERING SAUCER MULCH 3" MIN. KEEP FROM DIRECT CONTACT WITH TRUNK REMOVE EXTRA SOIL FROM TRUNK FLARE AND TOP OF ROOTBALL TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION, PLANT 2"-3" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. TREE SHALL BE SET PLUMB DO NOT PRUNE TREE'S LEADER. NO PRUNING OR CUTTING OF THE TREE SHALL BE DONE UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FINISHED GRADE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL 3 X ROOTBALL DIAMETER COMPACTED SUBGRADE ROOT BALL SHALL PLACED DIRECTLY ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE PLANTING SOIL - CONTINUOUS THROUGHOUT BED 12" MINIMUM DEPTH ADJACENT MATERIALS VARY SEE PLANS COMPLETELY REMOVE TOP 1/2 BURLAP LACING AND WIRE BASKET. IF CONTAINER GROWN, REMOVE CONTAINER AND LOOSEN ROOTS AT OUTER 1/2" EDGE OF ROOT BALL REMOVE EXTRA SOIL FROM BASE OF STEMS AND TOP OF ROOTBALL 2"-3" HIGH WATERING SAUCER MULCH 3" MIN. KEEP FROM DIRECT CONTACT WITH STEMS SCARIFY SUBGRADE AND WORK IN PLANTING SOIL IN A 1:1 RATIO SHRUB PLANTING BED SPACING VARIES SEE PLANS NOTES: 1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 2.NO PRUNING OR CUTTING UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3.SAUCER SHALL BE FLOODED TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. FACE OF BUILDING COMPACTED SUBGRADE COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW 1-2" ROUNDED RIVER ROCK 6 OZ. NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL) 2'-0" METAL EDGING not to scale not to scale not to scale not to scale not to scale ORNAMENTAL STONE DRIP EDGE not to scale ADJACENT PLANTING BED NOTES: 1.SUBMIT SAMPLE OF RIVER ROCK (BEIGE/TAN RANGE) FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. BRASS FITTINGS AT WATERLINE CONNECTION FINISH GRADE 48" MIN.12" 3 4" GALVANIZED STEEL RISER WITH INTERNAL CUTOFF BELOW FROST DEPTH 24"GALV. CAST IRON GARDEN HYDRANT SPIGOT HANDLE WITH FITTING FOR PADLOCK 3 4" CLEAN WASHED PEASTONE WATER LINE -SEE MEP SERIES 6" NOTE: INSTALL HOSE BIB YARD HYDRANT PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FROST FREE YARD HYDRANT not to scale 6 OZ. NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL) 4" X 1/8" STAKED METAL EDGE NOTES: 1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB CONDITION. 3.SAUCER SHALL BE FLOODED TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. 4.SOIL MOISTURE MAT MAY BE EXCLUDED FOR IRRIGATED AREAS. 3 X ROOTBALL DIAMETER ROOT BALL SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE PLANTING SOIL SEE SPECIFICATIONS COMPLETELY REMOVE BURLAP, LACING AND WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 1 2 OF THE ROOTBALL FINISHED GRADE EDGE OF 3" HIGH WATERING SAUCER REMOVE EXTRA SOIL FROM TRUNK TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION, PLANT 2"-3" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. TREE SHALL BE SET PLUMB DO NOT PRUNE TREE'S LEADER. NO PRUNING OR CUTTING OF THE TREE SHALL BE DONE UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SOIL MOISTURE MAT MULCH 3" MIN. KEEP FROM DIRECT CONTACT WITH TRUNK NOTES: 1.WATERING SAUCER SHALL BE FLOODED TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. 2.DO NOT CUT LEADER 3.SET TREE PLUMB TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SO THAT CROWN IS 2"-3" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AFTER SETTLEMENT 2"-3" PINE BARK MULCH (PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE) 3" HIGH EARTH WATERING SAUCER AROUND TREE PIT COMPLETELY REMOVE BURLAP, LACING AND WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 1 2 OF THE ROOTBALL EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO DEPTH OF ROOT BALL 6" BELOW ROOT BALL BACKFILL MIX PER SPECIFICATIONS TREE (SLOPE PLANTING) not to scale 3 X ROOTBALL DIAMETER ROOTBALL PLAN VIEW SECTION VIEW ANCHOR SYSTEM TREE HARNESS TENSION TENDON AND MATTING TIGHTENING TENDON STRAP ROOTBALL TREE TRUNK CONDITION VARIES TREE HARNESS TENSION TENDON AND MATTING TENSION SYSTEM ANCHORING LOOP ANCHOR 6' MIN. BELOW SUBGRADE. SEE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. TREE HARNESS SYSTEM not to scale 12" MINIMUM2" - 3" HIGH SOIL SAUCER FOR WATERING 3" MULCH CONTINUOUS OVER SOIL SAUCER FINISH GRADE MAKE SEVERAL VERTICAL CUTS TO RELEASE BOUND ROOTS AND PROMOTE OUTWARD GROWTH PLANTING SOIL MIX REMOVE PLASTIC CONTAINER AND 'BUTTERFLY' THE ROOT BALL AS SHOWN FILL BUTTERFLY AREA WITH COMPACTED SOIL IN CENTER OF PLANT PIT TO SUPPORT PLANT AT THE DESIRED ELEVATION. MAKE CERTAIN ALL VOIDS AND AIR POCKETS ARE FILLED.6"6"NOTES: 1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 2.NO PRUNING OR CUTTING UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3.SAUCER SHALL BE FLOODED TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. 4.SHRUBS SHALL BE SET PLUMB AND PLANTED SO THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL IS 1"-2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. EXI S T I N G G R A D E EX I S T I N G G R A D E 1 V :H S LO P E M A X 1 V :H S LO P E M A X NOTES: 1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS EDGE OF PLANTED AREA PLANT TYPICAL 60° TRIANGLE SPACING CONTINUOUS IN PLANTING BED MULCH 2" MIN. FINISHED GRADE PLANTING SOIL SCARIFY SUBGRADE AND WORK IN PLANTING SOIL IN A 1:1 RATIO COMPACTED SUBGRADE FOR GROUND COVER SPACING SEE PLANTING SCHEDULE GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL not to scale 1/2" WIDE STAINLESS STEEL BAND 2"X4" PINE NOTE: 1.THIS PROTECTION SHALL BE USED WHERE EQUIPMENT IS OPERATING WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE AND PLASTIC CONSTRUCTION FENCING IS INADEQUATE TO PROTECT THE TREE TRUNK AND SHALL BE USED ON A MINIMUM OF 6" CALIPER TREE. 2.DO NOT NAIL, STAPLE OR PIERCE TREE BARK. EXISTING GRADE EXISTING TREE 6" CAL. MIN. TREE PROTECTION - WITHIN DRIPLINE not to scale DRIP LINE3" AGED PINE BARK MULCH (PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE) FENCE POST PLASTIC OR WOODEN SNOW FENCE PLACED ALONG DRIPLINE 3" HIGH WATERING SAUCER AROUND DRIPLINE EXISTING GRADE 1/3 BURIAL OF OVERALL POST UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. COORDINATE LOCATION OF FENCE WITH PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. IF EXCAVATION OCCURS WITHIN DRIPLINE, EXISTING ROOTS SHALL BE CLEANLY CUT PRIOR TO EXCAVATION BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST AND TREES SHALL BE WATERED. PROVIDE 1X4, EIGHT (8) SLATS PER TREE. 4'-0" MIN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE. TIE SLATS TO TREE WITH LANDSCAPE ARBOR TAPE. ALLOW AIR CIRCULATION BETWEEN TREE TRUNK AND SLATS. PROTECT TO OUTSIDE OF DRIPLINE, MINIMUM.DRIP LINETREE PROTECTION - TYPICAL CONDITION not to scale EXTEND COMPACTED GRAVEL BORROW BEYOND METAL EDGING (4" MIN) L-502 LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 3/4/2022 1:49:23 PMLEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BEACON COMMUNITIES, LLC TR / MH MH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 05/03/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 803 Summer St, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02127 617.896.4300 www.bscgroup.com L-202 L-402 L-201 L-401 SZET E L A L A N E FORT AVE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - SALEM CON COM SET 07/12/2022 \\BOS-DFS\Projects-BOS\2328404\Landscape\Drawings\2328404-DET.dwg UP UP R E F .OVENDN R E F .OVENREF.OVENUP UP GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL CMU WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED FACE TO FACE. 2.ALL STUD WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD. 3.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY OR EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4.ALL OPENINGS WITHIN A MASONRY WALL ARE DIMENSIONED TO THE MASONRY OPENING. 5.ALL OPENINGS WITHIN A STUD WALL ARE DIMENSIONED TO CENTERLINE OF OPENING. 6.COORDINATE ALL FOOTINGS, PIERS, SLABS, AND DETAILS WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 7.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD. 8.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO DEMISING PARTITIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF OVERALL PARTITION. 9.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO THE EXTERIOR WALL ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD/OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION. 10.REFER TO A-900's FOR FINISH FLOOR AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. A-200.1 2 A -2 0 0 3 A -2 0 0 .1 1 A -2 0 0 .1 3 2A 119 1A 106 1C 107 2A 120 3C 122 2A 121 2C 108 1A 105 1A 103 1A 104 1A BF 109 COMPUTER LOUNGE OPEN TO BELOW STAIR 1 ELEVELEC ELEC TRASH 3B 123 2D 117 LAUNDRY 3A 125 3A BF 124 1A 126 1A 127 3A 130 3A 131 2B 1332B 132 ELEC DIST. 1A 128 2A.1 129 ST 2 ELEV 2B 101 2B 102 LIVING LOUNGE QRQR QR 1A 113 1A 115CO MTG 1 RSC PM MTG 2 EXAM WELLNESS ST PROPERTY MANAGEMENT WAITING WC 1 WC 2KITCHEN LIVING LOUNGE A-200 2 A-200 4 A -2 0 0 5 A -2 0 0 1 A-109 1 A-108 1 43'-6" 33'-6" STAIR 1 ELEVVEST A-200.1 2 A -2 0 0 3 A -2 0 0 .1 1 A -2 0 0 .1 3 LOBBY A-001 MAINT U-002 WATER W-001 24'-0" TRASH VEST 2 4 '-0 " ELEV20'-0"ST 2 COMMUNITY ROOM A-003 FITNESS 516 CORRIDOR 10'-6" 14'-0" BIKE ROOM A-002 UTILITY WC WC TENANT ORGANIZATION MEETING KITCHEN13'-5" A-200 2 A-200 4 A -2 0 0 5 A -2 0 0 1 A-106 1 A-107 1 43'-6 1/4"15'-8 1/8"ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/26/2022 12:15:11 PMA-101 GARAGE & LEVEL 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA 1" = 20'-0"2 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN N O R T H NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1" = 20'-0"3 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN DNUP DN UP R E F .OVENR E F .OVENREF.OVENDNUP DN UP R E F .OVENR E F .OVENREF.OVENA-201 2 A -2 0 0 3 A -2 0 1 1 A -2 0 1 3 STAIR 1 ELEV 1A 312 1A 314 1A 3131A 3111A 3101A BF 309 1C 307 1A 305 1A 303 2A 319 3A 325 2A 320 3C 322 2A BF 321 3A 324 1A 326 1A 327 1A 328 2A.1 329 3B 323 1B 318 2D 3171A 315 1A 316 2C 308 1A 306 1A 304 LAUNDRY ELEC DIST.2B 301 2B 302 3A 330 3A 331 2B 3332B 332 ELEC LIVING LOUNGE ELEC TRASH LIVING/ LOUNGE ELEV A-200 2 A-200 4 A -2 0 0 5 A -2 0 0 1 EQ EQ A-113 1 A-112 1 A-201 2 A -2 0 0 3 A -2 0 1 1 A -2 0 1 3 STAIR 1 ELEV 1A 212 1A 214 1A 2131A 2111A 2101A BF 209 1C 207 1A 205 1A 203 2B 201 2B 202 2A 305 3A 225 2A 307 3C 222 2A 306 3A 224 1A 226 1A 227 1A 228 2A.1 229 3B 223 1B 218 2D 2171A 215 1A 216 2C 208 1A 206 1A 204 LAUNDRY ELEC DIST. 3A 230 3A 231 2B 2332B 232 ELEC LIVING LOUNGE ELEC TRASH LIVING/ LOUNGE ELEV A-200 2 A-200 4 A -2 0 0 5 A -2 0 0 1 A-111 1 A-110 1 GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL CMU WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED FACE TO FACE. 2.ALL STUD WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD. 3.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY OR EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4.ALL OPENINGS WITHIN A MASONRY WALL ARE DIMENSIONED TO THE MASONRY OPENING. 5.ALL OPENINGS WITHIN A STUD WALL ARE DIMENSIONED TO CENTERLINE OF OPENING. 6.COORDINATE ALL FOOTINGS, PIERS, SLABS, AND DETAILS WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 7.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD. 8.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO DEMISING PARTITIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF OVERALL PARTITION. 9.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO THE EXTERIOR WALL ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD/OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION. 10.REFER TO A-900's FOR FINISH FLOOR AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:33 PMA-102 LEVEL 2 & 3 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA 1" = 20'-0"2 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 1" = 20'-0"1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION N O R T H DN DN R E F .OVENR E F .OVENREF.OVENR E F .OVENA-201 2 A -2 0 0 3 A -2 0 1 1 A -2 0 1 3 STAIR 1 ELEV 1A 412 1A 414 1A 4101A 409 1C 407 1A 405 1A 403 2A 419 3A 425 2A 420 3C 422 2A BF 421 3A 424 1A 426 1A 427 1A 428 2A.1 429 3B 423 1B 418 2D 417 1A 416 2C 408 1A 404 1A 406 1A 411 1A 415 LAUNDRY ELEC DIST. 3D 430 3D 431 2B 401 2B 402 ELEC LIVING LOUNGE ELEC TRASH LIVING/ LOUNGE ELEV A-200 2 A-200 4 A -2 0 0 5 A -2 0 0 1 A-115 1 A-114 1 A-201 2 A -2 0 0 3 A -2 0 1 1 A -2 0 1 3 1 A-301 A-200 2 A-200 4 A -2 0 0 5 A -2 0 0 1 2 A-301 GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL CMU WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED FACE TO FACE. 2.ALL STUD WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD. 3.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY OR EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4.ALL OPENINGS WITHIN A MASONRY WALL ARE DIMENSIONED TO THE MASONRY OPENING. 5.ALL OPENINGS WITHIN A STUD WALL ARE DIMENSIONED TO CENTERLINE OF OPENING. 6.COORDINATE ALL FOOTINGS, PIERS, SLABS, AND DETAILS WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 7.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD. 8.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO DEMISING PARTITIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF OVERALL PARTITION. 9.INTERIOR DIMENSIONS TO THE EXTERIOR WALL ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD/OUTSIDE FACE OF FOUNDATION. 10.REFER TO A-900's FOR FINISH FLOOR AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS. ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:38 PMA-103 LEVEL 4 & ROOF OVERALL FLOOR PLAN LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA1" = 20'-0"1 LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 1" = 20'-0"2 ROOF PLAN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION N O R T H LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" IJKNOPQRSU 3'-6" 7'-0" 10'-6" 10'-6" 10'-6" 10'-6"52'-6"5'-1 1/4"3'-0"4'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-6"7'-0"3'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-6"7'-0"3'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-6"7'-0"3'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-6"7'-0"3'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-6"7'-0" 1'-11 3/4" 6'-6 3/8"3'-0"3'-0"10'-0"3'-0"3'-0"6'-6 3/8" 1'-11 3/4" 7'-0"4'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"6'-6"3'-0"3'-6"7'-0"4'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"6'-0"3'-0"4'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"8'-0"3'-0"4'-6 7/8" 24'-0"23'-11 7/8"24'-0 1/8"24'-0"24'-0"36'-0"33'-0"33'-0"30'-6 3/4" 288'-5 3/4"55'-6"LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" 2346 175 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"52'-6"55'-6"17'-0" 18'-7 3/4" 25'-1 7/8" 24'-0" 24'-0"30'-0" 141'-5 1/4" 6'-11 5/8" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-11 3/4"1'-0 3/8" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-6" 7'-0" 3'-7 5/8"1'-6 3/8" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 9'-9" 7'-0" 4'-0 7/8" LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" V W X YII 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"52'-6"55'-6"17'-0"13'-0"13'-0"17'-0" 62'-7 5/8" 2'-3 7/8" 7'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 7'-0" 2'-3 7/8" 6'-3 7/8"6'-3 7/8" LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" Z AA BB CC DD EEJJKK MM NN 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"52'-6"55'-6"30'-0"27'-0" 16'-6" 33'-0"24'-0" 27'-0" 16'-6" 25'-9 3/4" 3'-0" 247'-4 7/8" 4'-5 7/8" 7'-0" 9'-9" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-6 5/8" 3'-9 5/8" 3'-0" 2'-9 3/4" 2'-5 3/4" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 7'-0" 2'-1 1/4" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-9 7/8" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0" 7'-0" 3'-6" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 5'-0" 7'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-2 3/4" 3'-0" 3'-3 7/8" 1'-7 5/8" 7'-0" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 9'-0" LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" A EBDC 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"52'-6"55'-6"17'-0" 13'-0" 13'-0" 17'-0" 62'-7 5/8" 6'-3 7/8" 7'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 7'-0" 6'-3 3/4" ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN SHEET TITLE PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:7/20/2022 4:20:40 PMA-200 OVERALL ELEVATIONSLEEFORT TERRACE SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY 220024 ST MA 3/32" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"5 WEST ELEVATION - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"4 SOUTH ELEVATION OF EASTERN WING - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION OF WESTERN WING - OVERALL DATE DESCRIPTION 0 8'16'24' LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" 2 31 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"49'-0"52'-0"24'-0"30'-0" 78'-9 1/2" 1'-5 3/4" 7'-0"4'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-6"7'-0"4'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"9'-9"7'-0"4'-0 7/8" LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" ZAABBCCDDJJKK 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"52'-6"55'-6"15'-9 1/2" 27'-0" 24'-0"33'-0" 16'-6" 27'-0"30'-0" 175'-1 1/8" 7'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-0 1/2" 3'-2 5/8" 3'-0" 3'-3 3/4" 2'-5 3/4" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-6" 7'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-6" 7'-0" 12'-5 7/8" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-4 7/8" 9'-7 3/8" 1'-6 5/8" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 9'-9" 7'-0" 4'-5 7/8" LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" N O P Q 10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"49'-0"52'-0"24'-0" 24'-0"36'-0" 1'-8 1/4" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-3" 7'-0" 3'-3" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4'-6" 7'-0" 4'-6" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-11 3/4" 4'-6 3/8" 3'-0" 2'-6" 10'-0" 7'-6" 3'-0" 4'-6 3/8" 2'-6 1/2" 7'-0" 3'-0 3/8" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-3" 7'-0" 9'-0" 2'-7 1/4" 9'-0" 3'-3" 10'-3" 9'-0" 4'-6" 9'-0" 2'-6" 9'-0" 1'-1 1/8" 2'-10 7/8" 9'-0" 2'-0" 9'-0" 2'-0" 9'-0" 2'-11 7/8" CANOPY 7'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:41 PMA-201 OVERALL COURTYARD ELEVATIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 3/32" = 1'-0"1 COURTYARD ELEVATION 1 - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"2 COURTYARD ELEVATION 3 - OVERALL 3/32" = 1'-0"3 COURTYARD ELEVATION 2 - OVERALL LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" T.O.S. 20'-5 1/4"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"7'-0"3'-6"49'-0"6 3/4"1A 1-BR 1A 1-BR 1A 1-BR 1A 1-BR 1A 1-BR 1A 1-BR CORRIDOR CORRIDORGARAGE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 6 GG75 2070 LOWER FLOOD ZONE 13'-6" 2070 UPPER FLOOD ZONE 14'-6" 1A 1-BR FITNESS 52'-0"100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 10'-0"1'-0"3'-6"UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT LEVEL 1.1 21'-0" LEVEL 2 31'-6" GARAGE 10'-6" ROOF 63'-0" LEVEL 1 14'-0" LEVEL 3 42'-0" LEVEL 4 52'-6" A EBD N O P Q R S U C ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:42 PMA-301 BUILDING SECTIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 5/3/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 7/12/2022 SALEM CON COM SET 3/32" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION 2 EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLIES FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION FOUNDATION WALLEWA1.1 U.L. = PER IBC TABLE 722.2.1.1; 12" PROVIDES MIN. 2HR TYPE IA • 12" POURED CONCRETE (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) FOUNDATION WALL - INSULATEDEWA1.2 U.L. = PER IBC TABLE 722.2.1.1; 12" PROVIDES MIN. 2HR TYPE IA (OUT TO IN) • 2" XPS RIGID INSULATION TO 4'-0" BELOW GRADE MIN. • 12" POURED CONCRETE (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.) (OUT TO IN) • FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WALL SYSTEM • 3/4" P.T. & F.R.T. WOOD FURRING BATTENS FOR RAIN SCREEN ATTACHMENT • 2" CONTINUOUS EXTERIOR INSULATION (R-8 MIN) • CONTINUOUS COMMERCIAL GRADE VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR BARRIER • FIRE RESISTANT TREATED EXTERIOR SHEATHING (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) • 6" METAL STUDS (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) • FILL CAVITY WITH NON-COMBUSTIBLE BLOWN-IN FIBERGLASS INSULATION (R-21 MIN) • (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB • FIRE CAULK ALL JOINTS IN WALL ASSEMBLY FIBER CEMENT PANEL ON METAL FRAMED WALL ASSEMBLYEWA2.1 U.L. = N/A TYPE IA TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION INSIDE OUTSIDE INSIDE OUTSIDE INSIDE OUTSIDE INSIDE OUTSIDE (OUT TO IN) • FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WALL SYSTEM • 3/4" P.T. & F.R.T. WOOD FURRING BATTENS FOR RAIN SCREEN ATTACHMENT • 2" CONTINUOUS EXTERIOR INSULATION (R-8 MIN) • CONTINUOUS COMMERCIAL GRADE VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR BARRIER • FIRE RESISTANT TREATED EXTERIOR SHEATHING (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) • 8" METAL STUDS (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) • FILL CAVITY WITH NON-COMBUSTIBLE BLOWN-IN FIBERGLASS INSULATION (R-21 MIN) • (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB • FIRE CAULK ALL JOINTS IN WALL ASSEMBLY FIBER CEMENT PANEL ON METAL FRAMED WALL ASSEMBLYEWA2.2 U.L. = N/A TYPE IA INSIDE OUTSIDE (OUT TO IN) • FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WALL SYSTEM • 3/4" P.T. & F.R.T. WOOD FURRING • 2" CONTINUOUS EXTERIOR INSULATION (R-8 MIN) • CONTINUOUS COMMERCIAL GRADE VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR BARRIER • FIRE RESISTANT TREATED EXTERIOR SHEATHING (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) • NOMINAL 2X6 FIRE RETARDANT WOOD STUDS (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) • FILL CAVITY WITH NON-COMBUSTIBLE BLOWN-IN FIBERGLASS INSULATION (R-21 MIN) • (2) LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB • FIRE CAULK ALL JOINTS IN WALL ASSEMBLY FIBER CEMENT PANEL ON METAL FRAMED WALL ASSEMBLYEWA3.1 U.L. = #U349 TYPE IIIA TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION (TOP TO BOTTOM) • STRUCTURAL SLAB (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • 15 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR BARRIER; TAPE JOINTS & PENETRATIONS • CRUSHED STONE; CONFIRM THICKNESS WITH GEOTECH/STRUCTURAL • FILTER FABRIC • STRUCTURAL FILL (TOP TO BOTTOM) • FINISH FLOORING (REFER TO SCHEDULE) • 3/4" PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR ADHERED TO RIGID INSULATION • NON BEARING WALLS SIT ON INSULATION LAYER • 6" RIGID INSULATION, MIN R-23, TAPED TO ACT AS AIR/ VAPOR BARRIER, ADHERED TO CONCRETE SLAB • STRUCTURAL SLAB (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) • GALVANIZED STEEL DECKING (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) • STEEL BEAMS WITH 3HR RATED SPRAY-APPLIED FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL • PROTECT PIPING BELOW SLAB WITH INSULATION OR HEAT TRACE AT EXTERIOR LOCATIONS • 4" NON-COMBUSTIBLE FIBERGLASS BATT SOUND INSULATION • SUSPENDED 5/8" TYPE 'C' GWB CEILING NOTE:SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS AT STRUCTURAL SLAB FOR CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE (UNHEATED SPACES)FA1.1 CONCRETE SLAB ON DECK WITH INSULATIONFA2.1 U.L. = #D919 3 HR STC = MIN 59 IIC = MIN 53 FLOOR ASSEMBLIES CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE (HEATED SPACES)FA1.2 (TOP TO BOTTOM) • STRUCTURAL SLAB (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • 2" RIGID INSULATION BENEATH SLAB AT ALL HEATED SPACES - TYP. • 15 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR BARRIER; TAPE JOINTS & PENETRATIONS • CRUSHED STONE; CONFIRM THICKNESS WITH GEOTECH/STRUCTURAL • FILTER FABRIC • STRUCTURAL FILL TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION (TOP TO BOTTOM) • FINISH FLOORING (REFER TO SCHEDULE) • 3/4" GYPCRETE • 1/4" ACOUSTIC UNDERLAYMENT MAT • SUBFLOOR (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • 20" TALL OPEN WEB - WOOD TRUSS (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) WITH SPRINKLERS IN CAVITIES • 3-1/2" NON-COMBUSTIBLE FIBERGLASS BATT SOUND INSULATION • RESILIENT CHANNEL AT 12" O.C. • 5/8" TYPE 'ULIX' GWB • NOTE: AT TILED FLOOR IN UNITS THE TILE AND MORTAR BED REPLACES THE SPACE LISTED FOR GYPCRETE AND ACOUSTIC MAT FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY AT UNITSFA3.1 U.L. = #L521 1 HR STC = MIN 50 IIC = MIN 50 (TOP TO BOTTOM) • FINISH FLOORING (REFER TO SCHEDULE) • 1" GYPCRETE • SUBFLOOR (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • 2X10 WOOD FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" O.C. MAX SPACING; (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • FILL WITH NON COMBUSTIBLE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION • RESILIENT CHANNEL AT 12" O.C. MAX. SPACING • 5/8" TYPE 'C' GWB • SUSPENDED 5/8" TYPE 'C' GWB CEILING FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY AT CORRIDORSFA3.2 U.L. = #L516 1 HR STC = N/A IIC = N/A ROOF ASSEMBLIES (TOP TO BOTTOM) • TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM • OVERLAYMENT BOARD • TAPERED RIGID INSULATION TO PROVIDE 1/4"/FT SLOPE DOWN TO DRAINS • CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION (R-30) • AIR & VAPOR BARRIER • EXTERIOR GRADE SHEATHING (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • NOMINAL 2X10 WOOD ROOF JOISTS AT 16" O.C. MAX. SPACING (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • FILL CAVITY WITH FIBERGLASS BATT SOUND INSULATION • RESILIENT CHANNELS AT 16" O.C. MAX. SPACING • (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'C' GWB • SUSPENDED 5/8" TYPE 'C' GWB (TOP TO BOTTOM) • MEMBRANE ROOFING • OVERLAYMENT BOARD • TAPERED RIGID INSULATION TO PROVIDE 1/4"/FT SLOPE DOWN TO DRAINS • CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION (R-30) • VAPOR RETARDER • EXTERIOR GRADE SHEATHING (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • NOMINAL 2X10 WOOD ROOF JOISTS AT 16" O.C. MAX. SPACING (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • FILL CAVITY WITH FIBERGLASS BATT SOUND INSULATION • (3) LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB • 7/8" HAT CHANNELS AT 12" O.C. MAX. SPACING • (1) LAYERS 5/8" TYPE 'X' GWB TYP. ROOF ASSEMBLY AT CORRIDORSRA2U.L. = #P521 1 HR TYP. ROOF ASSEMBLY AT ELEVATORSRA3U.L. = L556 2 HR (TOP TO BOTTOM) • TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM • OVERLAYMENT BOARD • TAPERED RIGID INSULATION TO PROVIDE 1/4"/FT SLOPE DOWN TO DRAINS • CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION (R-30) • AIR & VAPOR BARRIER • EXTERIOR GRADE SHEATHING (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • 22" TALL OPEN WEB WOOD TRUSS (SEE STRUCT DWGS) • 6" NON-COMBUSTIBLE FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION STRAPPED TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING • RESILIENT CHANNELS AT 16" O.C. MAX. SPACING • (1) LAYER 5/8" TYPE 'C' GWB TYP. ROOF ASSEMBLYRA1U.L. = #P531 1 HR TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:44 PMA-401 FLOOR, ROOF and WALL ASSEMBLIES LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION C2 C-1 C-1 A2 B2 C2 U 10A11 1B 10C112 C2 1 3311B 1 11 3A13E3A 3AC-1 3 KITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE 2 3 UC1 UC3 UC3 UC2 UC2 UC4UC5 UC6 WS1 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1C 1A1A 1A1A 1A 1A 1A 1A1A 1A 1A 1B 1A 1A 1A 1C 1A 1A1A1A1A 1A 1A 1A 1B 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A 1C GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. U C3 A1 B2 C2 D2 12 111 10A111B3 13A1B 3E3A 1B1C-1 C-1 C-1 333 KITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE 4 3 1B 3AUC6 UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1UC4 UC5 WS1 UC2 C3 A2 B1 C1C-1 C-3 C-1 11 13A10A1 1B1 1B 3A33A 2B 1B1 133 11B3 KITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE 4 3 1B UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC5 UC6 WS1 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:49 PMA-501 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 1BR LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 1A NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 1A RCP LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 1B 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 1B RCP 1/4" = 1'-0"5 UNIT TYPE 1C 1/4" = 1'-0"6 UNIT 1C RCP REF.OVENREF. REF.OVENREF. 1A BF1A BF 2A BF GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. U C2 A2C2 B2 C-1 C-1 10A33 1 110C1 1111B 3A1B 3A 3AKITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE 6 112 UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4UC5 UC6 WS1 B2 A1 A1 C4 D2 C1 C2 U C-3 C-1 C-1C-111B3310A 10A12B1B11 1 1B3A 3A1 3E112 BATH TYPE 5 KITCHEN TYPE 3 UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC5 UC6 UC6 WS1 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:54 PMA-502 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 1BR/2BR GROUP 2 LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker NO. DATE DESCRIPTION LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 1A BF 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 1A BF RCP 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 2A BF 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 2A BF RCP 28'-2 1/8"B2 A1 C2 A1 C4 C1 D1 U C-3 C-1 C-1 C-1 33 11B10A10A1 11 11B 2B3A 3A1B1 11 12 13E3 KITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE 1 UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC5 UC6 UC6 WS1 2A 2A 2A.1 2B 2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A.1 2B 2B 2B 2B 2A 2A BF 2A 2A.1 2B 2B C4 D2 B2 A1 C1 C-1 C-1 C4 C-3 1B111 1B 2B1 3A 3ABATH TYPE B3 UC4 UC5 UC6 GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. A1C1 C-1 B1 C3C-3 A1 C1 C-1C-1C1 U 10A1 12B 33A3A 3 1 110A 3311111B3A KITCHEN TYPE 2 BATH TYPE 4 A1 11B3 311B 1B 1B A1 UC2 UC2 UC3UC3 UC1 UC4 UC5 UC6 UC6 WS1 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:20:59 PMA-503 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 2BR LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 2A NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 2A RCP 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 2A.1 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 2A.1 RCP LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 1/4" = 1'-0"5 UNIT TYPE 2B 1/4" = 1'-0"6 UNIT 2B RCP REF.OVENREF. 2C 2D 2C 2D 2C 2D A1 C1C-1 C-1 C-1 C3 C-3 C3 A1 C1 C1 B1 11 11 12B1B 133 3A 3A1111 11 1 U 3A3 BATH TYPE 4 KITCHEN TYPE 1 33 3 1B1BUC3 UC3 UC2 UC2 UC5 UC6 UC4UC1 UC6 WS1 GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. U D2 B2C3 C-3 C-1 C-1 D2 A1 C1 A1 C-11333 1 110A1 2B1 1B 3A3A 3 1B111123E1 BATH TYPE 4 KITCHEN TYPE 3 1 31BUC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC5 UC6 UC6 WS1 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:03 PMA-504 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 2BR LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 2C 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 2C RCP LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 2D 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 2D RCP A1 C2 C-1 C-1 B1B1 C-3 C-1 A1 C2 C2 A1 C-1 1111 31B 1B1B 1B1 11 1 1 11 1B 11 3C 3A3A D1 U1B 12 3KITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE B3 BATH TYPE 7 3E 33 33 3A UC2 UC2 UC3UC1 UC4UC4 UC6 UC6 UC6 UC3 WS1 3A 3A 3A 3B 3A3A 3A 3A 3B 3A3A 3B GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. U A1 C-1 C2C2C-3 D2 A1 C2 C-1 B1 A1 A1 B1 C2 C-1 131B3A3A 3E1B 1B1B 11 121 3A1 1 11 11111 1 3C-1 3A 3 KITCHEN TYPE 1 BATH TYPE B3 BATH TYPE 7 3 3UC2UC2UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC4 UC5 UC5 UC6 UC6 UC6 WS1 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:08 PMA-505 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 3BR LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 3A 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT 3A RCP LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT TYPE 3B 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 3B RCP GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. 3C3C3C 3D3D A1 C2 A1 C2 C-1 C-1 A1 C-1 C2 B1 C4B1 C-1C3 U3C 1B11 1B 1 11B 2D3A3 3A1B1111 1111 111KITCHEN TYPE 2 BATH TYPE 4 BATH TYPE 7 1333 1B3 1B UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC5 UC5 UC4 UC6 UC6 UC6 WS1 U C2 C2C-1C-1 A1 C2C-1C-3C2 B1 B1 A1 A1C1 C-1 1B 1B11 110A 11111 1 1113A3A 3E1B 3 1B 3 3KITCHEN TYPE 2 BATH TYPE B3 BATH TYPE 7 B1 3 3311B UC3UC3 UC2 UC2 UC4 UC4 UC6 UC5 UC5 UC6 UC6 UC1 WS1 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:12 PMA-506 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 3BR LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 3C 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 3C RCP 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 3D 1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT 3D RCP REF.OVENREF. GENERAL UNIT NOTES 1.REFER TO FOR FLOOR TRANSITION DETAILS. 2.REFER TO A-XXX FOR ALL FINISH SELECTIONS. 3.PROVIDE FINISH FLOOR UNDER FRIDGE, SINK, AND OVENS AS WELL AS UNDER ANY REMOVABLE CABINETS. /---- SM# REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS R# WALL MOUNTED ENTRY SCONCE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT OR CEILING (SEE RCP FOR HEIGHT) RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS ACCESS PANEL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ELECTRICAL DWGS SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS SPRINKLER HEAD COORDINATE W/ PLUMBING/SPRINKLER DWGS CEILING MOUNTED HVAC SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 2' x 2' ACT CEILING *SEE ELECTRICAL & INTERIOR DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR ALL OTHER COMMON SPACE LIGHTING FIXTURES SM# R# P# FC# FC# FW# LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FC# WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS FW# SURFACE MOUNTED SMOKE AND CARBON DIOXIDE DETECTOR COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL DWGS T# CEILING MOUNTED HVAC RETURN DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS CEILING MOUNTED LINEAR DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS LINEAR SIDEWALL SUPPLY DIFFUSER COORDINATE W/ HVAC DWGS XX 1' - 0" CEILING FINISH MATERIAL HEIGHT ABOVE STRUCTURAL FLOOR UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 1) C-1: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 60" A.F.F. C-2: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 2 SHELVES CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 72" A.F.F., BOTTOM SHELF @ 42" A.F.F. C-3: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (6) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 72" A.F.F. C-4: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. UNIT CLOSET SCHEDULE (GROUP 2) C-1A: TYPICAL UNIT CLOSET W/ 1 SHELF CONT. WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-3A: UNIT LINEN CLOSET (4) 18" DEEP WIRE SHELVES EVENLY SPACED, TOP SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. C-4A: UNIT W/D CLOSET CONT. 24" DEEP WIRE SHELF W/ SUSPENDED CLOTHES ROD, TOP OF SHELF @ 54" A.F.F. U A1 C2 A1 B1 D1C-1C-1 C-1 C-3 A1 C1 C-1 B13 3C1 121B 1B1B3E 3A3A 31B 11B111 111 1 11 1BATH TYPE 6 B1 BATH TYPE 7 KITCHEN TYPE 333 UC2 UC2 UC3 UC3 UC1 UC4 UC4 UC6 UC5 UC5 UC6 UC6 WS1 3A BF ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:16 PMA-507 ENLARGED UNIT PLAN - 3BR GROUP 2 LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker LEVEL 4 LEVELS 2 &3 LEVEL 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 3A BF 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT 3A BF RCP REF.OVEN A-510 3A 3B 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S. 30" x 48" C.F.S. DW 1'-4 5/8" 2'-6" 2'-3 1/2" 3'-7 1/2" 4'-8 1/2" 14'-6 1/8" CLR DW 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S. 30" x 48" C.F.S. 1'-2" 2'-4 1/2" 4'-1 1/2"7'-2" 14'-10" CLR 2'-1"30" x 48" C.F.S. REF A-510 2A 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S.DW REF P18 4'-3 1/2" 4'-4 1/2" 2'-4 1/2" 1'-2" 12'-2 1/2" CLR 2'-1"30" x 48" C.F.S. A-510 1A 1B7'-7 1/2" CLRALIGN 30" x 48" C.F.S. W2436W3324W2136W3021 DWOVEN SB33DB21 ? BLIND CORNER CABINET BLIND CORNER CABINET 3'-0"1'-6"3'-0"7'-6"2" FILLER 2" FILLER BRC36 FILLER W2136 REMOVABLE BASE CABINET FINISHED END PANEL WHEN THERE IS NO WALL TILE BACKSPLASH TYP REF W2436W332418T1890 B12 3/4" FILLERFULL HEIGHT 1" FILLER, FINISHED END PANEL IF NO WALL FULL HEIGHT 1" END PANEL 2" FILLER 1" FILLER 1/2" FILLER TILE BACKSPLASH TYP 2" FILLER FULL HEIGHT 1" END PANEL 1" FILLER FINISHED END PANEL WHEN THERE IS NO WALL REMOVABLE BASE CABINET W2436 W3324 W1836 W3021 W1836 W332418 P18 DW SB33 DB18 OVEN B18 REF P183'-0"1'-6"3'-0"7'-6"TILE BACKSPLASH TYP BLIND CORNER CABINET 1" FILLER FULL HEIGHT 1" END PANEL 1/2" FILLER1" FILLER 1" FILLER INSIDE BOTTOM OF WALL OVEN @ 30" A. F. F. FINISHED END PANEL ON THE EXPOSED PANEL WHEN BASE CAB ARE REMOVED. 1/2" FILLER 2" FILLER 1" FINISHED END PANEL COOKTOP & DISPOSAL CONTROLS ON APRON VENTHOOD W3028 W2436 W3324 W1236 W3024 W2736 W1836 DW SB33 B12 B30 B15 DB18 WALL OVEN7'-6"2'-3 1/4"W/ REMOVABLE CABINETS & FINISHED END PANELS VERTICALLY ADJUSTABLE TO 34" A. F. F. 1" FILLER FULL HEIGHT 1" END PANEL BLIND CORNER CABINET 3" FILLER BLIND CORNER CABINET1" FILLER W2136 W3618 REF DB18 W3324 W1836 BCR36SB337'-6"4'-6"3'-0"ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:19 PMA-510 KITCHEN PLANS & ELEVATIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker 1/2" = 1'-0"3 K3 1/2" = 1'-0"2 K2 1/2" = 1'-0"1 K1 1/2" = 1'-0"1A K1 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"1B K1 - ELEVATION B NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/2" = 1'-0"2A K2 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"3A K3 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"3B K3 - ELEVATION B GENERAL BATH NOTES 1.SEE ACCESSORY KEY AND MOUNTING HEIGHT SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET FOR ALL MOUNTING HEIGHTS. 2.WALL REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED AT ALL ACCESSORY LOCATIONS. 3.WALL BOARD TO EXTEND TO FLOOR BEHIND BATHTUB. 4.REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACCESSORY MANUFACTURERS AND MODEL NUMBERS 5.DOOR LOCATION(S) MAY VARY. REFER TO UNIT PLANS. 6.ALL ROBE HOOKS TO BE MOUNTED ON WALL, NOT DOOR PANEL. 7.DENSHIELD BEHIND ALL WALL TILE. 8.BLOCKING TO BE PROVIDED WHERE SPECIFIED IN FLOOR PLANS ONLY PER MAAB GROUP 1 BATHROOMS 42.5.3: "THE WALL ADJACENT TO AND BEHIND THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE CAPABLE OF STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTING THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF GRAB BARS FROM 32"-38" ABOVE THE FLOOR. THE BACK WALL SHALL HAVE REINFORCEMENT FROM THE INTERIOR CORNER TO 6" PAST THE WIDEST PART OF THE WATER CLOSET. THE SIDE WALL SHALL HAVE REINFORCEMENT FROM THE INTERIOR CORNER TO A DISTANCE OF 6" BEYOND THE FRONT EDGE OF THE WATER CLOSET, UNLESS INTERRUPTED BY A DOOR OR OTHER FIXTURE, THEN THE REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS FAR AS POSSIBLE." 9.BLOCKING TO BE PROVIDED WHERE SPECIFIED IN FLOOR PLANS ONLY PER MAAB GROUP 1 BATHROOMS 42.7.1: "ALL TUB WALLS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTING THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF GRAB BARS FROM 6" ABOVE THE TUB RIM TO A HEIGHT OF 48" ABOVE THE TUB BOTTOM AND SHALL EXTEND THE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF THE TUB". 10.PER MAAB GROUP 2 BATHROOMS 44.6.2.b: "ALL WALLS OF THE SHOWER SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT TO ALLOW THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF A SEAT AND GRAB BARS, AT ANY LOCATION FROM THE FLOOR TO A HEIGHT OF 60" ABOVE THE FLOOR" 11.PER MAAB GROUP 2 BATHROOMS 44.6.1.f: FAUCETS AND MIXING VALVES SHALL BE CENTERED HORIZONTALLY IN THE LONG WALL OF THE TUB, 28" ABOVE THE FLOOR". 12.A HAND-HELD SHOWER HEAD WITH A FLOW REGULATOR, ATTACHED TO A 60" LONG FLEXIBLE HOSE AND AN ADJUSTABLE MOUNTING BAR, SHALL BE PROVIDED OR BE CAPABLE OF BEING INSTALLED ON THE LONG WALL OF THE TUB OF GROUP 2 SHOWERS/TUBS". 13.MIXING VALVES SHALL BE CENTERED HORIZONTALLY IN THE LONG WALL. THE CENTERLINE OF THE CONTROL SHALL BE MOUNTED 38" TO 48" ABOVE THE SHOWER FLOOR. 14.A HINGED, PADDED SHOWER SEAT SHALL BE INSTALLED OR BE CAPABLE OF BEING INSTALLED ON A WALL ADJACENT TO THE OPENING, THE SEAT SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH THE EDGE AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE OPENING TO PROVIDE A SAFE TRANSFER. THE TOP OF THE SEAT SHALL BE 17" TO 19" ABOVE THE SHOWER FLOOR." 15.IN THE HC/ACCESSIBLE BATHROOMS AND TOILET ROOMS THE FLUSH CONTROL FOR THE TOILET MUST BE ON THE "ACCESSIBLE SIDE" OF THE TOILET. 16. MATCH MIRROR WIDTH TO VANITY WIDTH. GENERAL NOTES TO BE ADDED TO/EDITED BATH ACCESSORY NOTES:5'-0"1'-6" 1'-4" 1'-7" 1'-7" 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S.A-513 1D 1C 1B 1A ALIGN 4'-2"8'-9" CLR 2'-9"2'-0"7'-0" CLR2'-6"6'-3"3"1'-6" 1'-6"3'-0"5'-0"1'-4" 1'-7" 2'-7" 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S.LN12 A-513 3A 3D 3C 3B ALIGN 30" x 48" C.F.S.1'-6"2'-0"7'-0" CLR2'-6"7'-3"3"1'-6" 1'-6"3'-0"WALL BASE AS SCHEDULE D1 1" FILLER P-1 VSB36 JJ L H A1 B C1 M2 3'-1 1/4"3'-0"2'-10"3'-4" MAXM1 SHOWER SURROUND F1 M1 B C1 P-1J SHOWER SURROUND J WALL BASE AS SCHEDULED D1 E F1 SHOWER SURROUND D1 WALL BASE AS SCHEDULE J WALL BASE AS SCHEDULED D1 E SHOWER SURROUND M1 E J VSB36 P-1 B H J P-1 VSB36 LN12 L SHOWER SURROUND M1 M2 C1 B A1 3'-0"2'-10"3'-4"1'-4" 3'-1" 1'-0" A-513 8 11 10 9 WALL BASE AS SCHEDULED SHOWER SURROUND D1 P-1 VSB36 LN12 H FILLER ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:23 PMA-513 BATH PLANS & ELEVATIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker 1/2" = 1'-0"1 B1 1/2" = 1'-0"3 B2 1/2" = 1'-0"1A B1 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"1B B1 - ELEVATION B 1/2" = 1'-0"1C B1 - ELEVATION C 1/2" = 1'-0"1D B1 - ELEVATION D 1/2" = 1'-0"3A B2 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"3B B2 - ELEVATION B1/2" = 1'-0"3C B2 - ELEVATION C 1/2" = 1'-0"3D B2 - ELEVATION D MOUNTING HEIGHT SCHEDULE - UNIT BATHROOMS KEY ACCESSORY / FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS MAAB GROUP 1 MAAB GROUP 2 A1 MIRROR BOTTOM @ 36" AFF BOTTOM OF MIRRORED SURFACE @ 40" AFF MAX. A2 MIRROR W/ MEDICINE CABINET, RECESSED BOTTOM INSIDE CABINET @ 40" AFF MAX BOTTOM INSIDE CABINET @ 40" AFF MAX A3 MIRROR W/ INTERNAL LIGHTS BOTTOM @ 40" AFF, TOP @ 72" AFF BOTTOM @ 40" AFF, TOP @ 72" AFF B HAND TOWEL BAR OR RING BOTTOM @ 40" AFF BOTTOM @ 40" AFF C1 TOILET PAPER HOLDER CL OF PAPER ROLL @ 24" AFF CL OF PAPER ROLL @ 24" AFF D1 ROBE HOOK CL @ 60" AFF CL @ 48" AFF E TOWEL BAR CL @ 48" AFF CL @ 36" & 48" AFF (36" @ HALF BATHS) F1 SHOWER ROD - CURVED CL @ 84" AFF CL @ 84" AFF F2 SHOWER ROD - STRAIGHT CL @ 84" AFF CL @ 84" AFF G GRAB BARS TOP @ 33" - 36" AFF TOP @ 33" - 36" AFF G18 GRAB BAR - 18" VERTICAL 40" OFF FACE OF TOILET BACK WALL 40" OFF FACE OF TOILET BACK WALL H LIGHT - VANITY CL @ 8" ABOVE TOP OF MIRROR CL @ 5" ABOVE TOP OF MIRROR J1 BATHTUB RIM @ 16" - 18" AFF RIM @ 16" - 18" AFF J2 SHOWER CURB MAX. 4" THRESHOLD MAX. 1/2" K SHOWER HEAD CL @ 78" AFF CL @ 78" AFF L TUB SPOUT CL @ 23" AFF CL @ 23" AFF M1 CONTROL - BATHTUB CL @ 34" AFF CL @ 28" AFF M2 CONTROL - SHOWER CL@38" - 48" AFF CL@38" - 48" AFF N HAND-HELD SHOWER w/ ADJUSTABLE MOUNTING BAR N/A BOTTOM OF MOUNTING BAR @ MAX. 40" AFF P-1 TOILET TOP OF SEAT @ 17"-19" AFF TOP OF SEAT @ 17"-19" AFF R SHOWER SEAT N/A TOP @ 17" - 19" AFF NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/2" = 1'-0"2 B3 1/2" = 1'-0"8 B7 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"9 B7 - ELEVATION B 1/2" = 1'-0"10 B7 - ELEVATION C 1/2" = 1'-0"11 B7 - ELEVATION D 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 48" C.F.S.A-514 8A 8D 8C 8B LN18 1'-6"1'-4"1'-7"1'-7"1'-6"7'-6" CLR6'-11"3'-1" 10'-0"4'-0"3'-1 7/8"SHOWER SURROUND M2 M1 SHOWER DOOR SHOWER SURROUND D1 SHOWER DOOR WALL BASE AS SCHEDULED SHOWER SURROUND SHOWER DOOR C1 P-1 9B H P-1 A1B VSB36 LN182'-10"3'-4" MAX3'-0"3'-1"7'-0"1" FILLER J D1 WALL BASE AS SCHEDULED C1 G D1 J L H M1 A1 B P-1 G 2'-8"3'-0"SHOWER SURROUND 2'-10"3'-4" MAXN M1 F1 M1 B SHOWER SURROUND J 3' - 6" CLR 1'-4" 1'-4" 30" x 48" C.F.S.30" x 72" C.F.S.T URNI NG RADI US 6 0 " CL R MI N. FD A-514 7 13 12 11 1'-6"2'-9"2'-0"5'-0" CLR7'-0" CLR10'-5" CLR 30" x 72" C.F.S.T URNI NG RADI US6 0 " CL R MI N. 30" x 48" C.F.S.A-514 1 9 3 2 7'-8" 1'-6" 3'-6" 1'-4" 1'-4"3'-0 1/16"5'-0"8'-0"7'-11"2'-6" 1/2" MAX E D1 SHOWER SURROUND P-1 C1 G 2'-10"2'-3" MIN CLRFLUSH CONTROL ON ROOM SIDE WALL BASE AS SCHEDULE P-1 H G B A1 M1 SHOWER SURROUND 3'-4" MAX1/2" MAX 2'-10"WALL BASE LOCATE HEAD / MIXING VALVE AT CL OF LONG WALL F2 SHOWER SURROUND F2 N 2'-3" MIN CLRA-514 5 14 15 16 ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:29 PMA-514 BATH PLANS & ELEVATIONS LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY Author Checker 1/2" = 1'-0"8 B4 1/2" = 1'-0"8A B4 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"8B B4 - ELEVATION B 1/2" = 1'-0"8C B4 - ELEVATION C 1/2" = 1'-0"8D B4 - ELEVATION D NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1/2" = 1'-0"1 B5 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"2 B5 - ELEVATION B 1/2" = 1'-0"3 B5 - ELEVATION C 1/2" = 1'-0"9 B5 - ELEVATION D 1/2" = 1'-0"6 B6 1/2" = 1'-0"10 B5 1/2" = 1'-0"7 B6 - ELEVATION A 1/2" = 1'-0"11 B6 - ELEVATION B 1/2" = 1'-0"12 B6 - ELEVATION C 1/2" = 1'-0"13 B6 - ELEVATION D 1/2" = 1'-0"4 B7 1/2" = 1'-0"5 1 - a 1/2" = 1'-0"14 1 - b 1/2" = 1'-0"15 1 - c 1/2" = 1'-0"16 1 - d ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:30 PMA-950 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING - SZETELA LANE LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:30 PMA-951 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING - COURTYARD LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:31 PMA-952 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING FROM FORT AVE. LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT CONSULTANT STAMP KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET TITLE 7/20/2022 4:21:32 PMA-953 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERING - FROM SCHOOL ON SZETELA LANE LEEFORT TERRACE 220024 SALEM, MA BC LEEFORT TERRACE LLC, C/O BEACON COMMUNITIES SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY ST MA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION