119 BOSTON STREET - BUILDING JACKET 119 BOSTON STREET
46' 0"
05 rods @ 2'-0"oc. -w/Z-0"height.
0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 Lj 0
------------------ --------- ----------------------;
--- ---- I45' 0' ------j
- --,
I I
New Garage Bay
I I
W/4000 psi conc.
15' 8" slab. 10 x 10 wm. o 17' 0"
I I
I
I ,
I I
I I I
711 Sq. Ft Addition. -------------- --
I I
I I
I
1 1
I I
r---- —
--- -- ------- --i- -------- ----------------------------------i
#5 rods @ 2'-0"oc. -w/2'-0 hei
I —�{ Z 6"Foundation return wall at both ends.l
11011
FOUNDATION PLAN
I ion. I
Dampproofing mastic from Scale: 3/16"= V-9'
I grade to top of footing/conc. I
13' 0"
#5 rods @ 1' - 0" vertical typical I
 rods 1'-0" horizontal tied.
I perimeter pvc preverated
jpipe to dry well wl filter fabric.nj
j
4,000 psi concrete footing and foundation.
11611 #5 rods @ 1'- 0" vertical typical
 rods 1'-0" horizontal tied.
I i
I
1
RETAINING
I I
WALL
Scale: 3116' = 1'-0" j
I
=------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Garage Bay Addition October i,201 a
�"�ERED Aq .i
C
Spiros Energy
HH Design Group Architects Qo ps
A6
1 Ticehurst Lane
119 Boston Street No.
Salem. MA Marblehead, MA01W BOSTON, J
781 639 3493 MA
David M. Haliotis,Assoc, AIA spry Or 1111%
41
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
( " BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970
KmmERLEYDRiscoLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846
MAYOR
n
August 4, 2014
Decision A
rn c
City of Salem Board of Appeals '"F It
ern C
Petition of EVANGELOS FRANGIAS, requesting a Variance per Sec. 3.3.4 T'ar� e R�uired and a
Special Permit per Section 3.3.3 Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning,�Ordinance, to allow
an addition to the rear of the existing nonconforming building to accommodate ifn addigonal garage
bay, at the property located at 119 BOSTON STREET (B2 Zoning District). �L„
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 18, 2014 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 4 11. The
hearing was closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran
(Chair),Mr. Dionne, Mr. Watkins,and Mr. Copelas (Alternate).
The Petitioner seeks a Variance per Section 3.3.4 Variance Required and a Special Permit per Section 3.3.3
Nonconforming Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance.
Statements of fact:
1. In the petition date-stamped May 23, 2014, the Petitioner requested a Variance and a Special Permit
to allow the addition of an additional garage bay to the rear of an existing nonconforming building.
2. Attorney George Atkins presented the petition for the property at 119 Boston Street.
3. The proposed addition would infill an "L" at the rear of the existing building. It would be 15'-8"wide
by 45'-0" long, and 17'-0"in height. The existing building is 14'-0"in height.
4. The existing building does not meet the 30-foot minimum depth of rear yard requirement of the
zoning code — it is located only five (5) feet from the rear lot line. The rear wall of the proposed
addition would be seven (7) feet from the rear lot line.
5. The property is currently a commercial garage and will remain a commercial garage.
6. The requested relief,if granted, would allow the Petitioner to add a garage bay measuring 15'-8"wide
by 45'-0"long by 17'-0" high to the existing nonconforming building.
7. At the public hearing, no members of the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the petition.
The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and
after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's
presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the
provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance:
Findings —Special Permit:
1. This is an expansion of an existing use
2. Community needs served by the proposal are similar to the existing condition of the property. It is an
expansion of an existing use.
3. Traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading, is not changed significantly. The creation of
indoor parking and work space will minimize outdoor storage.
City of Salem Board of Appeals
August 4,2014
Project: 119 Boston Street
Page 2 of 2
4. Adequacy of utilities and other public services will remain the same.
5. The impact on the neighborhood character is minimal, as the additional garage bay is in keeping with
the existing character of the building and is located in the rear of the building.
6. Impacts on the natural environment including view are minimal since the additional garage bay is
located in the rear of the building.
7. The potential economic and fiscal impact, including impact on City services, tax base, and
employment,is positive since the result is an improved building.
Findings—Variance:
1. The situation and configuration of the building, located at the rear of the lot and set into a steep hill,
is unique and creates a hardship. The proposed location for the addition is logical —it is infilling the
existing building. If the addition were constructed at any other location on the property it would
impede the workings of the property.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would be a substantial hardship.
3. The proposal is an expansion of an existing use, and the desired relief may be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good.
4. The desired relief may be granted without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or
purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance.
On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted four (4) in
favor (Mr. Watkins, Ms. Curran, Mr. Dionne, and Mr. Copelas in favor) and none (0) opposed, to grant the
requested Special Permit and Variance to allow the addition to the rear of the existing nonconforming
building to accommodate an additional garage bay, subject to the following terms, conditions, and
safeguards:
1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the
Building Commissioner
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly
adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. Exterior finishes of new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
7. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained.
8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but
not limited to, the Planning Board
1��n
U(A.CQy—
Rebecca Curran, Chair
Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal fmm this decision, if any, .shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40,4, and shall be filed within 70
days of fi4'ng of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or
Special Penis granted herein shall not take effect until a ropy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South
Registry of Deeds.
Titu of �ttlem, fttssar4 setts
Public Prupertp Department
Nuilbing Department
(9ne 6aiem (5reen
508-745-9595 Ext. 380
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer September 20, 1995
Sortirios Korisianos
119 Boston Street
Salem, .Mass. 01970
°E: 119 Boston Street
Dear Mr. Korisianos:
It has come to the attention of this office through the Neighborhood
Improvement Committee hot line that you may be using the property located
at the above mentioned location illegally.
It has been alledged that there are more than (3) thr unrel ed persons
occupying a one single family dwelling unit. If t 's is it 's in
violation of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, A is II, finition
Section 2-1 general rules (Family) .
Please contact this office upon receipt 4of 1 ter as to notify us
of your intention in this matter. Failure so 1 result in legal
action being taken against you.
Thank you in advance for your coo eration n this matter.
Si erely,
Leo E. Trembla
Inspect r f ildings
LET: scm
cc: Dave Shea n /
Councillor Hayes, Ward 6 v"
Certified Mail # P 921 832
(04-*"*?'1MM007
Chit of ihlem- Mass ar4us etts
joublic Propertg Department
iguilding Department
One 6stem (5reen
500-745-9595 U.xt. 30❑
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer September 20, 1995
Sortirios Korisianos
119 Boston Street
Salem, Mass. 01970
RE: 119 Boston Street
Dear Mr. Korisianos:
It has come to the attention of this office through the Neighborhood
Improvement Committee hot line that you may be using the property located
at the above mentioned location illegally.
It has been alledged that there are more than (3) three unrelated persons
occupying a one single family dwelling unit. If this is so, it is in
violation of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, Article II, Definition
Section 2-1 general rules (Family) .
Please contact this office upon receipt of this letter as to notify us
of your intention in this matter. Failure to do so will result in legal
action being taken against you.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Leo E. Tremblay
Inspector of Buildings
LET: scm
cc: Dave Shea
Councillor Hayes, Ward 6
Certified Mail # P 921 991 832
ofttlem, � ttsstttljuse##sll �0 311 /b '/B
� t
°Z s Poxrb of '4pral Flu#
•f�/NII.'L
81"09%SALEM,MAPS.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SOTIRIOS KORITSIANCS FOR A
VARIANCE FOR '119 BOSTON STREET (B32)
A hearing on this petition was held March 16, 1988.with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messr. , Bencal, Luzinski, Strout and
Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others
,and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from front yard
setback requirements in other to allow the construction of a canopy in this
B-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Proposed canopy will enhance the property;
2. The proposed canopy will allow the pe-itioner to be competitive
and continue business at this location;
3. Abutters appeared in favor of this petition with conditions that
appropriate retaining walls be constructed.
4. Canopy cannot be located in any other area on this property.
On the basis of the above finding facts, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial
hardship to the petitioner;
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Cr
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SOTIRIOS KORITSIA.NOS F-R
VARIANCE FOR 119 BOSTON STREET, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . All construction be done as per plans;
2. All construction to conform to all city and state codes;
3. Retaining wall must be built along the Prospect Street side, not
lower than six (6) inches below grade;
4. Retaining wall to be built along the entire rear portion of the
property to prevent erosion;
5. Both retaining walls must be maintained;
6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department be adhered to;
7. No outside speaker system to be in operation at any time.
GRANTED f
J J
ames B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
F'",. TH!S DEi;IS!ON. ANY, SHALL BE 5"wDE POPSuAi'1T TO SECTVJ 17 OF THE �.'.
;R,-S C:I:_Q CCS n 9 SHAD SE FlLE;; IY''riiN ZO DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF N!i:.i
THE
O:C!;E CF THE Cli! CCE F.K.
� ;-TER . li THE VArR S. r, SP7U-'-, FE
"-E .I U A CXPi O FV. __„ '_ _-i;i
RL:.. TF_ :,h E.,S'? P_ °7 C" c '.g A`;D __. Er 71ji
OF RE:.9R ;;H IS W'JRDED AND NC1ED Oii THE u"'A':iER'S CERTIFICATE OF TIT.E.
BOARD OF APPEA!
of $alrm, �fussuchusr##sAm ;0 $ u ib 'U
+�°Illl"C
01;•106€9K,SALEM, MARS.
DECISION ON THE_PETITION-OF SOTIRIOS .KORITSIANOS FOR A
VARIANCE FOR 119 BOSTON STREETJ(B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held March 16, 1988 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messr. , Bencal, Luzinski, Strout and
Associate Member LaBrecque. . Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others
and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from front yard
setback requirements in other to allow the construction of a canopy in this
B-2 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Proposed canopy will enhance the property;
2. The proposed canopy will allow the petitioner to be competitive
and continue business at this location;
3. Abutters appeared in favor of this petition with conditions that
appropriate retaining walls be constructed.
4. Canopy cannot be located in any other area on this property.
On the basis of the above finding facts, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial
hardship to the petitioner;
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
r
DECISION ON THE PETITION. OF SOTIR.IOS KORITSIANOS FOR n
VARIANCE FOR 119 BOSTON STREET, SALEN.
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
relief requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . All construction be done as per plans;
2. All construction to conform to all city and state codes;
3. Retaining wall must be built along the Prospect Street side, not
lower than six (6) inches below grade;
4. Retaining wall to be built along the entire rear portion of the
property to prevent erosion;
5. Both retaining walls must be maintained;
6. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department be adhered to;
7. No outside speaker system to be in operation at any time.
GRANTED / �)
ames B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
AFPE;1
F"",! THIS DECISION. n SHALL BE ;'SDE PURSUANT TO SECTION! 17 OF THE 0
SHALL BE FILE:; iC'T:-iN SO DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF Fl Llfi
_r L.I;:'• I:'� THE 0:;!;.E OF THE Cli! CLEER.
..• . -" SH;PiER ..['s. li. THE V;RNA`
C. ' SP,CIM rF;
ii..., . . . YHE _ r'r. T- _ .. ...I H.. _ `Sc9 C7 A. F'._
S.,.r Ft 4. n Fes.. FI'.E Tr., EF __ 'G E,. ` _n
. .. _ Y R :F ThE_
OF R'E:CR CR IS kEL,RDEO ANO N«IED ON THE OVINER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Ot> of
Nvarb of ` ppral '80 JUL 28 910 :08
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
JULY 9, 1980 SALEFII
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SOTTRIOS AND THECCUTOS i OP.ISIA*0S FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR 119 BOSTON STREET.
A hearing on this Petition was held on July 9, 1980, with the following
Board Members present: James H. Boulger, Jr. , Chairman, Messrs. Hopper, LaBrecque,
Hacker and Luzinski. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and a
notice of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News on June 25 and July 2,
1980, in accordance with Mass. General Laws, Chapter 40A.
The Petitioners have requested a Special Permit to construct an addition
14' x 45' to the existing non-conforming structure at this location.
The property is within a B-2 District. The proposed addition will be attached
to an existing automobile service station and will meet all density regulations
except the rear yard setback.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to the
Petitioner's request for a Special Permit to construct an addition to a non-conforming
structure is Section V-B, 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeals may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in
Section VIZI F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of non-conforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion
of non-conforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detri-
mental than the existing non-conforming use to the neighborhood, nor shall this
paragraph apply to billboards, signs, or other advertising devices.
With respect to Petitioner's request for a Special Permit to sell previously
owned automobiles at this location, this Board, in reviewing this request, is
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by
the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety,
convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board, after considering the evidence at the hearing on this matter, finds
that the proposed construction at this property and use of the property are in
harmony with the surrounding area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence presented at
the public hearing, the Board of Appeals finds (i) that the proposed construction
on this property and the proposed use of the property will not be substantially
more detrimental than the existing use to the neighborhood, (ii) that the proposed
construction on this property and use of the property will promote the public health,
safety, convenience, and welfare of the City' s inhabitants, and (iii) that the
..
Tutu of �Weiu
'80 JUL
�-'c�r�l Df ,.��r�I 28 A10 :08
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
JULY 9, 1980 - DECISION - 119 BOSTON STREET - PAGE TWO SALE ''.f,
proposed construction on this property and the proposed use of the property is
in harmony with the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly, the Board approves
the granting of Special Permits to the Petitioner. (4-0 with Chairman Boulger
abstaining)
The Special Permit is therefore granted. _
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
DouglaHopper, Actrtg Secretary
Board�o£ Appeals v y
APPEAL FROS. THISDECI5I�N. 17 ",NY, SHALL s` PORSiiP.iiT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
CENERAL LAMS, CHAPTER £ A%d0 SHALT - --- :,;i,-0N 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILINO
OF THIS DEC:SiCPi 1" TH' TH° `CITY CLER5..
PURSANT TC tGENERA:- L i C 3 c i '- ti TN7 \A^,IA r'CE DR SPECIAL PERMIT
�_.,� r,Py ; H i�. Es.RIN3 THE CERT-
R,4; ED F r _L.: SHALT N - „-.9_L:� HAS BEEN FRED, -
FICATION OF THECI-'y En :- <
OR TH4T. L SUrr APPEAL HAS D J ' c I - �1�:: aS=D OP. DENIED IS
RECORDED IN THE StlUT ESSEX P,Ei LaTR1 - "2EX D 'UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED.AND NOTED ON THE CMNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
- BOARD OFAPPEAL
_
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
'.t, L
�hJ_ " ��OGK �`1 I
I �,- 15��1 � / 3 �
� The�Commonwealth of Massacltl.E��tONAL SERVIGES'
°' # Department of Public Safety I
� � ���= M.ssachusetts State Building Code(730 CMf����p � ^ �� ��
, - Building Permit Application for any Building other than a One=`8 �F 4iY�tsW n� �
. � (ThisSection For O(fici;il Use Only)� �
Building Permit Numbec Datc Applied: Build'uig Officitil: � �
� SECTION 1:LOCA'PION(Please indicate Block#and Lot k for locations for which a stieet address is mt available)
//4 BvS7`v,�J 5i• .�al�t.1 O/ 97D f
No.�nd St�eet City/Town Zip Code Nime oE Building(if applicable) �
� � SECTION 2:PROPOSED WORK � � � �
� Edition of MA St.ite Code used S j" [f New Cons[ruction check here�or check all that apply in the hvo rmvs bclnw �
Esisting 8uilding C� R��ir�O��;Altention Additiun❑ Dcmcil�tiliii � (Pl�ase f�l ou[ in�t•subamt Appendix l),�*v�� ",
Change of Use ❑ Ch�nge of Occup@ncy s�,.,O ,,.::., Othcr ❑ Sp�ufy:,
Are building pl�ins and/ur mnstruction documcuts being supplied as vart of this permit applicatiun? ^Yes� . �No ❑ �
[s an Inde enden[S[ructunl En ineering Pcer Revicw myuimd? Yes ❑ Nu ❑
p 8 �L
Brief Description of Proposed Work:��'// ��i/l�1 ����-+r �k�� � ���-
L v� � -
� � y� -.:..4�' _c'�;4itF`^..� .""-.4�.751.-��. .
� ' 1
�.�' t �f iAkA � x'�. t .`s 1 �. r� ..-�
'. . . _ . - , r..y � ? p� s V�.,,�.
1
SECTION 3:COMPLETE THIS SECTION[F EXISTING BUILDING UNDEftGOING RENOVA'CION ADDITION 02�
. , ..:���� :�..t e+�ra�. � CHANCEINUSE'OR?OCCUPANCY � � �'•°: r-y.:'y``�% ' �":'�r:
Check here if an Existing Building Investigatian and Evaluation is enclused(See 7S0 CMR 34) ❑
Esisting Use Group(s): Rropuseii Us4Group(s):
SECTION 4:BUILDiNG EIEIGHT AND A2EA
� Existing Proposed
Nu of Floors/S[uries(indude basement levels)&Area Per Fluor(sq. ft.) / �
Total Aren(sy.ft.)and Total Height(ft.)
� � SECTION 5:USE GROUP(Check as applicable) � � �' " �
A: Assembly A-1 ❑ A-2❑ Nightdub ❑ A-3 ❑ A-1❑ A-5❑ B: Uusiness E: Gducational ❑
P: Facto F-1❑ F2❑ H: FIi h Hazard H-L❑ H-2❑ H3 ❑ H-9❑ HS❑
L• Institutional 4l ❑ l-Z❑ I-3❑ [-�❑ NL• MercanHle❑ R: 2esidential R-lO . R-2❑ R-3❑ 2-1❑
S: Storage S-L❑ 5-2❑ �U: Utility❑ Special Use O and please describc beluw: �
. Spccial Use'
� SECCION 6:CONSTRUCT(ON TYPE(Check as applicable) �
IA ❑ @ ❑ IIA ❑ 1[6 ❑ IIfA ❑ [[B ❑ IV ❑ VA ❑ V6 ❑ .
SECTION 7:SITE INFORMATION(refer to 780 Cb1R i1tA for details on each item) �
Water Suppl : Glood Zone[nformation: Sewage Disposal:
Trench Permit: Debris Removal:
Public Check if outside Pluod Zune Indicate municipal
A trench wil ot be Licensed Dispusal Si[e
Pcivita� � reqwmil� or[rench orspecify:
..s,,. . a , or md.entify Zone: or on s�te system❑ ? . . G'X
\ � .F., ��rmit is endosed� , . ,; � �
l�ii�;a;.ifA ti! wy � Yl..�r� '.\ .'2�" . ..•'.'t ,'��74��
:
+ S
. . ... .-. , . - � . .� - . .
.li.ulroai nght of rvay: - F(azards to Air Nav�ga[ion: ; \i%\I�I itit�n C nnmi v n I �i icu 1 r r i �:": �,�
� Nut Applic�ble,.� .._�;�Is Stnitturc withm�urvort a.Yproach area? � ...,Is thcir revitw�omple� il� ;^ �
+ i '..i. x.. . / �., � . ":`.;� .
� or Cunscnt tu�Build enclosed ❑ Ycs O �ir Vu�LB' �Yes❑ Nu' �
SECT(ON 8:CONTENT OP CERT[FICATE OF OCCUPANCY �
Edilinn of Code:_�Usc Group(s):� "Cypc nf Construction: Ocaipant Luod per Flooc
IDocs thc building cunlain an Spriuklcr System?:�d Spccial Stipulations:
. ��� w�� ��
78l SSj �s 3s
��
� s�
SECTtON 9: P20PERTY OWNBR AUCFIORIZ:YfION'
Name nnd Addmss,of•.P�rqverty Owner - .
C59 i,.i
F}/An�,Pltt�,> FRaN6'i��ds:2s�i (, 1 1 f�r.�s}�n Sr� J'yr9�5 d/ 7�
Namc( ruit) No.and Strcet City/To�vn Zip
, / Propeuy(Ow{ner�Cpnt:ic'Pln'fo�mwfio�: -
V ���
4Z 1�s �r � ��'�/ttd /b y 5a��$�rs �e��� d�r� ,/. G�,,,.
Title ' Tclephone Nu. (busunss) "Cclephone Na (cell) �— c-mail adJress
[f applicable, the property orvner hereby authocizes
i `
�
Name Stre�tAd�iress�, .. e.. � City/Town �: - , St�te -� � Zip . :,y,�, ;:;�
to act on the ro er owner's behalf,in all matters relative fo work authurized b [his lim[d�ii�x'ermit a `�licatton.�� ' " � �
� � , SECTION 10:CONSTRUCTION CONTROL(Please fill out Appendiz 2). . � �
If buildin is less than 35;OIX1 cu.ft.of endosed s ace and or not under Construction Con[rol then check here O nnd ski Sectlon 10.t
101�Re istered Professional Res onsible for Construction.Control �
�ow/.�s �l.a��as- r�l _s3q_ ,�Y93 �,�.Z 9 Q �,
Name Re istrent Tele ho �o e•mail address Re�istration Number
� Ti��i��..C.� �irn�/t�^ceA� � vI y b
Sheet Addmss ° City/Town State Zip Discipline Expiration Date
102 Ceneral Conhactor " " � � � - � � � � -�
� y�N� ��� d•�
Company Na e �
���s Yo�,u�- C°s - �03 �a�
Name of erson Responsible for Cunstruc[ion License No. and Type if Applicable
S3 Br m r k�ll .l7Y ,L��v�cJ .�lA� v�9u2
S[reet Address City/Tuwn , State Zip
�`� ?8/ _63�_ Ss9j� ;.,
Tcic hone No. business Tele hone No. cc(t e-mail address
� SECTION 11:bvc]r.�:F'I:S'CO��irr�5n�riou iNsua��NCf' •�ffi[�;�vrr M.G.L.c.152. 25C 6 � � �
. A 4Vurkers'Cumpensatiun[nsurance Affid.rvit from the MA Department of Industr:�1 Accidents mus[be completed and
submittiit with[his application.. FaiWre tu provide this affidavit will result ui the denial uf the issu.lnce of the building permit.
Is a si ned Affidavit submit[ed with this a lication? Yes❑ No ❑
� � � - . SECTION 12:CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND PERMIT FEE � � �
Item Estim�ited Costs:(L.�bor
� and bfatcricils) Total Constmction Cost(from[tem 6)_$ f1�
I. Buil�ing S $I9 o�+v '
. Building Permi[Fce=Total Cons[ruction Cost x_(Insert here
� 2. Glectrical $ Jav� • Q u• ,ippropriate municipal faccor)_$
3. Plumbing 5 / o ao . C u
�. �fechonical (FIVAC) 5 B��`Jza. �O Note:Nlinimum fee=� (contact municipalitY)
. S. �Iechanical Other � Encluse dieck i �ble tu
, G.Total Cost $ u��, P�Y�
/ (contad municipality)and writc check number herc
SECTION 13:SIGNATURE OF BUILDING PERh11T APPLICANT
By eiftering my n.me below,[hereby attest«nder the paiqs and penaltles of perjuryrthat all of the informatiun contained in this
application is true and aau�ate tu the bes of���� owledge and understanding. ' / �"� ' l
OU 5 UAl 0��1�Pr� ��L'�-'$ Q Y /Z�l(
/ Nlcasc print d sign�ame Title 'f�lephone No. D��r
V r �I _��L � D�l 9�Z
�
� Strcet AdJress Gty/Towu tate Zip
iblunicipal Inspector to fill nut this section upun application approval: _�'-`� "'�"'� � �
iVame Date
New CMU garage bay
,
SPIROS ENERGY g
Existing wall and
chain link fence
�_ � �� ;'s�:
�� �
a a � �
, 9, 0,,
❑ ❑ ., �
' 17' 0" ' ' "
. 28, �„ � _, , � 4� p��
i r--^'
' . 1 �____ 1 11 y a.
�
-�p-4- ;. :�:
L _� u
1 � �
��`SIDE ELEVATION
'Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0"
,
> ,
NewGarageBayAddition a fweusc,o,�o�a
� �G�gtiE ED ,��;��
HH Design Group Architects �J S °. � �� A 1
Spiros Energy 1 Ticehurst Lane ., a� �
- , 119 Boston Street Marblehead,'MA 01945
�� Salem. MA 781 �9 �� � '�
9
. , o`i B�MA N J
David M. Haliotis,Assoc, AIA ���lH OF MpSS�C�
�
c.
60' 0"
14' 0" 46' 0" ���ng wall and
�->
45' 0"
.
�----------- -
"___'_'____________'__"__ _________'_'___"____'_______"__'____'__'_'____r' _" '�
New Garage Bay � � �
W�400o psi conc. ; ; 17� ���
" o��r� R�� slab. 10 x 10 wm p; � ;
� ,
, , ,
� � ,
� � ,
� � �
�
. . � � �
• , , �
711 Sq. FtAddition. �---------1- — �
, �
. �
�
�
,
�
' restroom. �
Existing Garage 1918 Sq. Ft..
restroom.
8� ���
�-----------------� �-----------------, • �------------- �
, � -----
, � , i � �
� � i i � ; i i ��.. -
� i i i
� � � i � i
i � i � �
� i i
i �
i � i i i �
i i � � �
i t
i . i i � � � � i .
� i i � � i
i � � 1 . �
i i � �
� � I I j I �
. I I � �
1 � I � I �
Au ust 10,2014
New Floor Plan NewGarageBayAddition -
Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0�� - �6�g�EREO qq�y�'
S ros Ener HH Design GroupArchitects �aJ�`� . y+ �
� gY 1 Ticehurst Lane
119 Boston Street o.
Salem. MA Marblehead, MA 01945 y eosron ��
781 639 3493 k M� /��,
David M. Haliotis, Assoc, AIA �f'�'ti nf M��
�
New CMU garage bay
Existing wall and
chain link fence , „
. r ' ' , ,. ,
. .. . .� ,.. . :. , :: . .. ... . , .
Existin Grade. � � istin de. � � ��
�
� 14' 0" �
� 9, 0„ �j�
' I� �
�� �
13' 0�� New garage bay retaining carrtilever wall � ;
Existing Grade Beyond. ; � Existing Grade Beyo�d
_____'_"_"______'_"'_____'___ 'L'__"________ - .
__"'______________"_"_1'__"'__'_"'_______'_______�'__ ___
___ '______"___'___"_'_______'___'__'__'_________'_'__' i
i
� I
i �
�------------ ------------- 4� ���
, ------------------------- ------;
---------------
, �
. I_ ___ ____________________________
_______________ _________________________'
46' 0" �
r'______"____'___'__'_'_'________'_'_____'_____'____"_'
__'____'_______'l . .
� i
' ' ' REAR ELEVATION
I
� _ �, 2„ ;
; __ I Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0"
� . ; � -
� � .
' Dampproofing mastic from �
, , , .
' ' grade to top of footingJconc. I
, , .
; 13� 0° ; #9 rods @ 1'- 0"vertical rypical I
� o :' �  rods 1'-0" horizontal tied. � .
� i I
� ,
� ' �
; `-' ' 4,000 psi ooncrete footing and foundation. ; �
; � � � #9 rods @ 1'- 0"vertical typical ; �
,^ I � ;. , -.,  rods 1'-0"horizontal tied. I
; � �
� � 8, O„ � ,
� ,
� ,
,
. � ;
� ,
;
; RETAINING ►vewGarageeayAddition `G�S�ERE �R�y'�t4 I .
. i � �4, `� C. 1. 1
j CANTILEVER Spiros Energy HH Design GroupArchitects � 0�J6 H � �
� � WALL s�ie: ��s°_ ��-0" 119 Boston Street 1 Tcehurst Lane ; o: z y ;�. � e A3
I Marblehead, MA 01945 o eosroN
�-------------------- ---------- Salem. MA ° y� Ma . ,:
------------------- 781 639 3493 F •:
David M. Haliotis, Assoc, AIA ��fH_OF�;% ,
�
.06 Mil EPDM rubber roof inembrane w/2" urethane insulation
mechanicaily fastened - 1/8" per foot slope.
Exceeds R40 3/4"adYantek;t&g plywood glued and nailed.
AzekTrim. Aluminumflashing '
. � Lead flashin Azek Trim.
2 5/S" type x gwb HR) typical -
LEGEND: � tkS�Rr,d's �k�ct,dbeacn�6�,
m fire hom light � . ve�+caV4�Ps� cm�c.
exit exit sign 17' 1���
� fire extinguiser
B manuel ull 4' Q" '� �
. P �" i I Existing wall and
, �P emergency light �7' 0" 11' ;':?j j 9, O„ chain link fence to be
• :::.I I removed at new
� heat 1350 � `" � '
� 10' 0" � ;' ; ; �garage section.
: � �
; � ,
�'�I �
:.:-I 1
G' I I
FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT � � --
�v �,., 4� 0��
S��e. ��V� - 1�-0�� ' °:i?j �
� �
�"�-- 17' 0 ' � �
�
r-------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
i• , r , , �
, t . �. r i '' ' i
�
�
� �� _ GFI cFi ; CROSS SECTION
�" �'- ---------- ------- --------- � Scale: 3/16,� _ �,_p„
------- ,
�
-------- - --------- - ---------
r-------------- -- �
_ ________ _ ________ ________ _ _____J_______ �
flow GFI floor GFI ceilir� � i
outle[110 outlet110 outlet�l0 � i
15� 8° -'� � � Garage BayAddition. � � � � � '�7� 0�� �
�' , 4"flr.dra�n . --------------- � �
,, --- 13 0 ¢-----�--- �t3�o----------4„�r.d�ain�� I ; �
--- , � . , 13 q � �
, , , �
� ,
. % / I
exft ' , � . ,- _ � ,
, . , , �__. ,
� , , '� , �
, � � relocat6-------------'+-- - '
-------- ----------
a�� ------_• --1/----- ' ebsti �� . � '
� � modl e 200,000 / � _______;electri�mefec��"�; �
------_' -
---.BSgt�B.�---�-- -------- T - �� - � � �%1t - -------� �-, sub rel , �
• , - - - -- ---- - '—� � __�
.-' �
�
� ,� � ," iF---�=.
�_�'�� Conr�ed new sYstem � �� - -- rrew electric
• , ��" to epsting addressabi�-�""� 45 0 ^�t�
�ce��������
__,
_-y,'
� New Garage Bay Addition ��°�Z01^
G�StiERED A y� -
�� �� �.
711 Sq. Ft. Spiros Energy HH Design Group Architects ap`�6 ''� ��
119 Boston Street 1 Ticehurst Lane �
Salem. MA Marblehead, MA 01945 oy eos ro�
781639 3493 �iF MA
David M. Haliotis, Assoc, AIA q� oF �a;;�'
�
-- -------------------------- , - . I
. � . i — ---i � ��.
--------- --------------'---------------------,
I ; I 4,000 psi concrete 4" slab w/ 10x10 wm ;
�---'-- � �------�7�-��� ------------ ; ; & .06 mii polyethylene vapor barrier typicai. i
, I � , �, , . , � ; #5 rods �ia 2'-0"oc. -w/2'-0" height. I
� ; �
� , .: � � � � � I
� , `. � � �
� .,-�.,�L___ ___________ _______________ I �
. I � I 1 � � _ \ � -
�:.'': I
� I :'.'.'" I _
. . i r-----------------i x —
i i i i o o i
i i
� i i . i � i . • �
� � � R5 rigid insulation. �
,. ; . ...
, . .: , , , .
i- '-.���____J__________J________________ _
� � � I 1 " # 5 rods @ 2' - 0"vertical typical I
� � � � & (2)#5 rods t8� b horizontal tied. �
� � �
� • ' 4'-0" '
; ::;;� � I ; o o - perimeter pvc preverated ;
' ' � pipe to dry weli w/filter fabric. I
� � � � , �
. �
; �; I I i , „ dampproofing mastic from ;
� � 1 -0 g�de to top footing after I
. ; : � � �
� � � �
; � � • I , ;:�' removal & patching all ties w/ ;
; '.:;:: ; ;._ �, ; 2 0 hydrolic cement. I
� , �' ` ' 12" 3/4" stone. ;
I ; ;a �' ' �
i - 4,000 psi concrete footing and foundation. ;
' FOUNDATION CROSS SECTION ;
, � � �
, � ,
I � � � Scale: as noted �
,.,::
� .:; � �
,
. , . ------ ----- --- ------- ---------
� , • ; ,�r
4�� � �� ` ' - ' --- ----- - - -- - -- — - --
� � CO ' •n '�------ #5 rods @ 2'-0" oc. -w/2'-0" height. ; .
� �
� , � ,
� � � � �
; � o ; ; �� �� �
�
� , , , _ �
. � , � , � -� ,
� , , ; , ,
; ; ; ; , Dampproofing masGc from ;
I � �O ' I I grade to top of footing/conc. i
� ' ' � 13' 0" ; #9 rods @ 1'- 0" verticai typical �
� ' ' � �  rods 1'-0" horizontal tied. �
� , , � o � ,
� , , � � ,
; � � ; ; �
�
1 1 I � � 1
; -,•x; I I ; -� 4,000 psi concrete footing and foundation;
j ';::; r----------r---- -------- - -------; �� 6 0 o a o #9 rods @ 1'- 0"vertical typical �
' ' � '  rods 1'-0" horizorrtal tied. �
� � � � . �
. � � � � . .> . �
; � � ; � 8� 0�� � �
� I I � 1
� ' ' � I
� I I � I
I
� I I � �
1 I � I
; ; ; I RETAINING WALL ;
, � ; I � Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0" I
� � �
. ; , ; ,
i :: •� , � ,
--------------------------------�
i n �-------- - -------- �
� '----- - --_'
15 8 —� New Gerdge Bay Addition Aueusc�o,zoia
�,
�6�S�F.RS CAR�yi
Roof Plan Spiros Energy HH Design GroupArchitects �Qo� y+ ` ��
Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0" � 119 Boston Street � T�hurst Lane �,
Marblehead, MA 01945 i �• s �
Salem. MA 781 �9 �93 �; eosroh �
_ �z MA `
David M. Haliotis,Assoc, AIA `9�ry o� M . �
�_"-
.
�- New CMU garage bay
SPIROS ENERGY B
Existing wall and
� chain linkfence
� �� ;
� �
� 9� ���
❑ ❑ �
' 17' 0" ' "
� 2g' p" , +--- �'�.' �;. '.:� 4� ���
�0' fl" f=.--} _
�____ _ __ ___ - r
�
SIDE ELEVATION �
Scale: 3h6"= 1'-0"
��
,
New Garage BayAddition °,z°�4
�,�v�s����'��Hil�,
Spiros Energy HH Design GroupArchitects ��JG '4 � A 1
119 Boston Str�eet � r�hurst Lane
Salem. MA . Marblehead, MA 01945 o eosro ; "
7816393493 �yf,, MA�-;�? � _
David M. Haliotis,Assoc, AIA ��oF H�°'`-- ,.'
� � ..
il
60' 0° —
� 14` 0" , „ Euisting wall and
46 0 ir� eraee
45' 0"
,------------ -
---�---------- �
------ -----------
___'___'_____'_____'______'__'___r_'____'_'___' '
• New Garage Bay � � !
W/4000 psi conc. ; � �
, � 15' �" slab. �ox lowm j ; 17' 0"
� � �
, , �
� � �
� , , .
, , �
� � �
, , �
711 Sq. Ft Addition. =-------------;- -- ;
�
�
,
�
. ,
restroom.
Existing Garage 1918 Sq. Ft.. restroom.
8� 0��
� �-----------------
, � �------------------
� � � � �---------------
� � � '
� , , � � ,
; , , � � � office.
� � � � ,
� � � � �
� � I I � �
I � � i I
� I I � � �
� � � I 1 �
I I a �
� 1 1
� 1 1 f I
1 � � � � �
1 � � � � I
I � � i �
1 � i �
I
I � 1 :. 1
�
�
. N@W F�001' P�all NewGarageBayAddition � P�� 14
Scale: 3/16��= ��-0° . '�G�SS6REDCARCy��` �
S iros Ener HH Design GroupArchitects eaaG H+
p 1 Ticehurst Lene " ,'�� �
119 Boston Street � o, 2 ;;
Salem. MA Marblehead, MA 01945 o eosTON • �
781 6393493 %�, MA T��4
David M. Haliotis, Assoc, AIA '� ��� oF M'`'�
. �
New CMU garage bay
Existing wafl and
' chain link fence , „ .; , , 1
F�dstin i ' ` � µ r
;, ,
Grade. �
; ' 'sti de � � ��
,
14' 0" ��
� � 9� 0„ ;
' ,
' 13' 0° � �
I New garage bay retaining qrrtilever wall I �
Existing Grade Beyond_ ; I Existing Grade Be ot�d.
- 'L____'_'_"'_' "__'____"_'_'____'___ '_'____'__'_"___"___'__'____'1_'__'__
_"_._______"_'_'____"_
_________'___'_____'_�_" ___
i i
- �___'_'_"'_"' '_____"_"'_'___'_" �
, --------------------------------------------------� 4� Q��
� ,
�---------- '
------------------------------------------------------------------
� 46' 0" �
r'__'__"'______'___'_"'__
i ___'_'_'_'__"_""'_"____'_'__'_""_'
_�____ry
1 �
' � I
. ; _ �, 2„ ; REAR ELEVATION
-� � Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0"
. � , ,
, ,
� --'— Dampproofing mastic from �
� , ,
� i I grade to top of footing/conc. ;
� 13' 0" ' # 9 rods @ T- o"vertical typicai �
� I ` �  rods 1'-0" horizontal tied. � .
� o I �
I
' I �
� I
1
• � I
I ' ;,"-' 4,000 psi concrete footing and foundation. ;
� �' 6*' � # 8 rods @ 1'- 0" vertical typiql �
� 8#2 rods 1'-0" horizontal tied. ;
�
, - � �.. . .:--., �
I � 8� ��� �
� �
, ,
. � �
� �
;
� RETA)N I NG New Garage Bay Addition �` ,,a� ���o,zo�a
. �
' CANTILEVER ��.��5`��s�Ry�y�
! HH Design Group Architects j .
Spiros Energy 1 Ticehurst Lane � � ' A3
i WALL s��e: �,s°_ ��-0" 119 Boston Street
I Marblehead, MA 01945 3 �• 9 ��
------------ --------------------------------- Salem. MA
781 6393493 y,� B�MA N c:
�
David M. Haliotis, Assoc, AIA ```���h OF Mp5<,c
\._.__�
� :�
.06 Mil EPDM rubber roof inembrane wl 2" urethane insulation
mechanically fastened - 1/8" per foot slope.
Exceeds R40 3/4��advantek t&g plywood glued and nailed.
• Azek Tnm. Aluminum flashing
Lead flashin Azek Trim.
LEGEND: � 2 5/8" type x gwb HR) typical . New 10"CMU garage bay
,, r � �5 ands �Ixc�bet3mt�5�,
' m fire hom light • Yex^�:csVqWo f's� css�c.
exit exit sign 17' 10" 
� � fire e�inguiser
�� �
. B manuel putl 4' 0" � " � Existing wall and
, �
�P emergency light �7' 0" 11' ; ; 9, 0„ chain link fence to be
:•`, I I removed at new
� heat 1350 � �
�_ ��� ��� � � � �garage section.
� �
,
� ,
.'� �
' � I
�rl I
FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT ,::;_��_'
- Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0,� ` " 4� 0��
,
. � 17' 0" —� �
�--------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
1 ;�' � ..�. 1 r 1 ' i
�.. l � �
. . . � . � .. .. . . 4 ... � � . ..... . �.. .
I
� �� GFI GFI ; CROSS SECTION
--- ''- ---------- ------- --------- -------- � Scale: 3/16��_ ��-0„
�
-------- - - --------
,-------------- - I
_ ________ _ ______'_ _ _____J____
_____ _
___________ _
C21�if16 � I
ou[Iet1��10 ��G� o�dlet�l0 � �
15' 8�� ..''� � Garage Bay Addition. � ; � � � '�7' 0"
- - - ----------------- � �
. Qq"Br.drain � ---------------- �
--- - 13 0 ---- �T3�o a 4"f�r.-diain� � ; � �
-- - ;' . ; �3�q I ;
� • , � ,
, � � ,
;� , i �
exft ; i __ � ;
, -----/-—� ' -
re"'°ve ------ --------- % re�ocat€--- '�-- ;
eristing , ------' ------- , a�pslfr� new2D0 �,
---�� %--- modl e 200,000 , , ,'' __-----�eledric meCe7:���"�' �
-- - --- --,
r--_'
--- �--=�1�-�-- - --�jhr■ - - �� - � L%�Y _, � sub rel ; �.
. _ _ _ ---__-_ , i
__�
i P�� -'� ir-_- , rcwelectric
. ��� `O Conrx�ctnewsystem � �� ��.
to ebsting addressabl�-' '4Jr � . , .
rJ' Zaie cerdrsl sfation:"
�=j,
. � New Garage Bay Addition � n� u�c�o,aoi a
e�,�S�EREO A Cyi
� 711 Sq. Ft. Spiros Energy HH Design GroupArchitects �$o�`'"S � y, r`� ��
119 Boston Street 1 Ticehurst Lane '
Salem. MA Marblehead, MA 01945 �
781 639 3493 �y� OryjA N .\'
David M. Haliotis,Assoc, AIA ;. �y oF �np`, ^`"
p -
,
-- ------------------------- ----
� -----------------------------------,
� ' ' 4,000 psi concrete 4" slab wl 10x10 wm ;
r___.1__ �%1 nll � , - � .
� I � -� � U --------- ; ; & .06 mil polyethylene vapor barrier typical. �
' � ' � #5 rods aL}2'-0" ec. -w/2'-0"height. ;
; � , �:�. _ �. � ,
� I � I .
' . I .I.. I' I '. I
. I � � .;.. L___ _______'___ ___________'___ � . � �
� 1 I I � � � / - � . I
.•? �
' ; I n'. I . 1 � � � � � —% p O � "� �
...
' I
� 1 .� I I I I '.. •�:' � I •
� " I � . . I I I I '�' : :;� j
� -- ___�__________J________________ _____� � � R5 rigid insulation.
,_ _ ,
' - ' 1 " # 5 rods @ 2' - 0" vertical typicat ;
� I I �
, � � � ' � ,_ „ & (2) #5 rods t& b horizontal tied. �
; .,;; ; ; I 4 � o o ; perimeter pvc preverated j
• � � � � pipe to dry well w/filter fabric. I
' � '' � � I dampproofing mastic from � �
' � � , ° 1'-0'' �
; ; , ; ,. grade to top footing afier I
I � • � I 2,_O;;`� � r�emoval & patching all ties w/ ; '
� �
I , ,;.; I ��
: ;; � a, �, � hydrolic cement. ;
• � ,.; � . �� � � 12 3/4 stone.. �
; � � ; 4,000 psi concrete footing and foundation. �
• ; ' ' - � FOUNDATION CROSS SECTION ;
� � , .
; � ' ; Scale: as noted 1
,.:
� ::... , . � � �--------------------------=---------------------'
� � �
:: :
�� �� :" ' '
4 � k.! � �p i 'p_ r___"__'______'__"___________
'_____'__'_'__"______"'__'___"___i
' ' r � � #5 rods @ 2'-0" oc. -w/2'-0" height. ;
� �
� I I 1 1
� •..(. I I ' 1 . � �
� 1 � t � 1 11 �
� � - 1 2 . �
� I v� I I -; ;
� � � � , �
� , ,
� ' ' ' � Dampproofing mastic from ;
� I I I
I
I , � � ; ; grade to top of footing/o�nc. ;
' � � � �3� ��� #9 rods @ 1'- 0"vertical typical ;
j � � f , " ;  rods 1'-0"horizontal tied. I
i r �. � , i
� i � i i �
. i i � �
I �..y.i. 1 I 1 � I
I 1 � 1 '�__� I
' ' ' ; � i: 4,000 psi concrete footing and foundation�
�-'� .
� , ;
# 9 rods 1 0 verticai ical �
, .. r---------i---- ------- -- -------I�' �� 6=0 o a o #2 roas�1 o tyP '
� � � �
�
; � � � . � '- "horizontal tied. ;
, � . . . . ., . ,.
� � � � � 8' O,' 1
� , ,
� � �
� , , , � ,
� r , ,
� � � � �
� , , , ,
� , , � �
� , , I RETAINING WALL I
' � � ' ; Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0" ;
;' . ,
� � �
� , ,
� � � �
� ,
'----- - ---. �------------'--------'----------------- '
------------------'---
� 15' 8�� --�-I New Garage BayAddition ~ r- . �o,�0�4
.�,yG\S�ERED C�./i
Roof Plan s iros Ene HH Design GroupArchitects pJG� �y ``�'
Scale: 3/16"= 1'-0" P �y 1 Ticehurst Lane ;` � Q
119 Boston Street
Salem. MA Marblehead, MA 01945 • 3 � •�
osrorv.
781 639 3493 �y��. MA ` '
David M. Haliotis,Assoc, AIA q�ry OF M�S��,`` �'
�
.
119 BOSTON STREET 2077-08
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
NCITY OF SALEM
GIs #: 117
Map: 16
Bock. SIGN PERMIT
Lot. 0136
Permit: - 'I Sign n'
Category: SIGN
Permit# 2077-08 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO:
Project# JS-2008 001710 ,
Est Cost:'4;v ' $5,500.00 `, ' Contractor: License: Expires
Fee Charged: $0.00 Graphic Impact _
Balance Due:$.00 "" Owner: FRANGIAS EVANGELOS
#of Fixtures - Applicant: Graphic Impact
DigSafe# n " ''''' AT: 119 BOSTON STREET
UseG—roup
ConstClass
ISSUED ON. 24-Jun-2008 AMENDED ON. EXPIRES ON. 24-Nov-2008
TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK:
SIGN PERMIT AS APPROVED FOR(SPIRO'S ENERGY)
THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF
ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS.
Signature:
GeoTMS®2008 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc.