80 BOSTON STREET - FIRE CODE NOTICE DUIUaING DEP
9a tk is (Gitu of 22�Pi1t, It8B22C��LiBPtf$ Ki$} 4"'
'1` 9123 !_0 oo � °T9
Pri 19rpnrtmrnt 3Ir0gitttrtrr , r�
48 Infagette f4rert RECEIVED
3(emre C1. trrnunn CITY OF SALEM,MASS
,i V
at
f' k FIRE CODE NOTICE
yri
Dates May 21, 1979 `r '
To ' Metropolitan Automatic Sprinkler Corp. E$'+
` Ret John Fiynn & Solis
P.O. Box905
_ 80 Boston St. ,
Peabody, Mass. 01960 Salem, Mass.
r
t is r
S3rsI
> Your 'ttention is called to the requirement of the Salem Fire - �k
Prevention Bureau, that plans be submitted with an application
for permit to install, (Form #81) = before any approval may be
f granted for installation of any f1re extinguishing system,
rr; y or . fire protection as required by, the Salem Fire Cade or the r ,a
provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code. t
t . §
Y YoU hBiVe failed to comply with the following items: s„
Plans' submitted without Form #81. (Application & $5- 00 fee )
2*. Only three sets of plans filed. Four sets are required.
ote set remains at Fire Prevention, Two sets$ts to be sent to
i the Salem Building Inspector, one set to be kept by app licant. . F j
r, ta 3. It, shall be noted. that Salem requires a permanent gauge be p2ace dP
.�,
at the inspectors test pipe, for inspection purposes. ,r
P p
4. , A test of the installation qon com letion, in the �
itlltiis required u h<
'^ 'r
xY
presence of a fire official. .*` ^
- .
w 't
You ,are hereby notified that this office, will not approve any Instal
' . 'ations or plans for same , until the Form #81 is filed with sufficiel2t,t
plans, as required under provisions of the applicable regulations ,,,,
# Respectfully submitted, °
r ' a
' w Gccs Salem Building Inspector
t .
John Flynn & Sons Salem Fire Mar a1 77�
'�.
I. S. O. F`'zgi�i
file `;
F rt'y i K
�
� 7 Q., Form � 25b (Rev. 7/78)
k{
4<c
(617) 532-2907
(603) 434-7007
METROPOLITANAutomatic Sprinkler Corp.
�I �� phvtacftnrr� �; .
P. O. BOX 905 PEABODY, MASS. 01960
S. O. M-78-1614
Date 4-24-79
Re , John Flynn & Son
80 'Boston St. . . _
Salem, Mass.
Co
Salem Fire I)ep.t,......
48 Lafayette St.
Salem,..Mass.. . 019.70 .. ....... . . ... ...
Attn:Lt.Goggin
Gentlemen: Fire Prevention
R herewith
We are Bending to you
... .. under seperate cover
_. .. .. ...... for your use in construction - 7
...._..__........ for your files and distribution
... for approval
the following prints for revised approval
}
_. as per your request
3 as approved by Insurance Services Office for your'
acceptance - please return one
Y
. ......... .......�. ...............�.. ....... ...... ... t
,
Very truly yours,
METROPOLITAN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORP.
Estimator
1 4
.FnF._ro..._
gcer
• )3 MON 07 ;07 RM PELLETIER. GRRY 5083762680
P. 02
REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
RIS
TEL: (549) 966-3121
`
FAX: (508) 966-3223
October 23, 1999 D&MO�+rt°"
City of Salem
Mr. Albert C. Hill, Jr.
One Salem Green
Salem,MA 01970
.RE: Demolition of Flynnian,Building, 80 Boston Street, Salem, Mass
Dear Gentlemen:
Your attention is drawn to a certain contract let relative to bid specifications issued by
the City of Salem for the demolition of Flynntan Building, 80 Boston Street, Salem,
Massachusetts. As you are aware, an issue has arisen relative to additional work that
needs to be performed at the location in question. Certain additional work relative to
asbestos removal has arisen. It has been determined that this additional work not called
for under the original bid specifications I have reviewed with my subcontractor an
estimated cost for the removal of this additional asbestos. It is estimated that the cost for
this additional removal would be in the neighborhood of$40,000,00.
Before Regional Industrial Services Corporation proceeds with this work, we are hereby
requesting that you provide us with adequate assurances that Regional Industrial
Services Corporation will be compensated for this additional work
As you are aware, this project is scheduled to be completed on or about November 1,
1999. Accordingly,your immediate response providing adequate assurance for this
additional compensation must be received. If such written confirmation is not received
within a commercially reasonable period of time, it is our intent to cease work and/or not
perform this work. We will proceed with work only upon receipt of written reasonable
assurance from you that compensation will be paid far this additional work.
Should you have any questions regarding any of the foregoing,please feel free to contact
me.
Very truly yours,
J
Robert E. Oppenheim �� � a�
CC: Jonathon D. Friedmann, Cargill, Sassoon &Rudolph
REOfjlp 5
P.O. BOX 459 • 79 HIXON STREET • BELLINGHAM, MA 02019
REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL RIS SERVICES CORPORATION
TEL (506) 966-3121 f �
4
FAX: (506) 966-3223
February ], 2000 D�"OL"tov
City of Salem
Mr. Peter Strout
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Certified Mail #Z 545 854 657
Re: Requisition O for the Flynn Tan Site, Salem, MA
I
Dear Peter:
I have enclosed a copy of our third requisition that we have forwarded to the
Finance/Audit Department.
As per our discussion, all but $5,000 has been billed at this time. This
amount will be billed upon completion of the Loam and Seed portion of the
project.
Also, please find the documentation for the additional loads of debris.
Sincerely,
Robert E. Oppenheim
P.O. BOX 459 • 79 HIXON STREET • BELLINGHAM, MA 02019 1
A
ENVIRONMENTAL. RESOURCE RETURN CORP ,
270 EXETER ROAD , IP .O . BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE O3042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 50;3 670-"2525
Waste In - Charge Scale „7ic'ket
Ticket !j jj±57A ' OperatW: SS Oate : !.21.14/1999
Vehicle : RS ANY REGIONAL SND„ TRUCK,
Customer : RASA REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : M_XCO3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Unita ?2 48 TONS
Time In : 09:56:05
Time Out : 10:06:46
Gross Wt : 40500 lbs
Tann Wt : 45500 lbs
Net Wt : 44960 ibs
22.43 tons
ADMA #YI
Hy_ : Mon-Fri : 7am-5Pm; Sat , 7am-1 noon
TO THE BEST OF MY .KNOWL.EDGE THIS ZUQ,
CONTAINS iJ0 HA S `,TE7R�`'l} ,
w
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOY L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )079-2S26
Waste In — Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket: # : 734395 Ouerator : SS Date 1.7./14/1499
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RTS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : NIXCO3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 21..64 TONS
Time To : 12:34:32
Time. Out : 12:46:00
Gross Wt : 8856O lbs
Tarr Wt : 45280 lbs
Net Wt : 43280 lbs �
2144 tens
ADMyAT #7
Hrs: Mon—Fri : 7am-5Pm; Sat ' 7am- i2noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THTC TRUCK
CONTAINS NO AP.DOUS_ ` ATQ ALi
P
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOX L.
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE (603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )579-2.526
Waste in — Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # : 734413 Operator : SS Date 12/14/1999
Vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL.
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location SALEM Units 21 .29 TONS
Time In : 15:18:51
Time Out : 1.5'30.:1.1
Gross Wt 87680 As ,��,.... .
Tare Wt 45100 As
Net cut : 42580 As
21 .29 tons
ADMAT #7
Hrs:: Mon-Fri : lam--SF:mr Satz 7IT-12nocri
TO THE BEST OF MY M%K' WC�DGE TA' I/, TRUS_K
CONTAINS NO U MSoo 1 k4
'•'/ f
i
mss'"
+ r
a
i
` ^
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , PZ . BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679~2626 PAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 734354 Operator : SS Date 12/14/1999
vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL.
Huteria{ ` MIKCD3 MIXED CED
Source MA
Location ; SALEM Unite 24J7 TONS
Time In 11:34:39
Time Out 11:45:21
Gross Wt : 93960 lb* "
Tare Wt 44420 lb*
Net Wt 49 l
�-�
°
ADMA7 0l
Hra: Mon-Fri : 7am-5Pw Sat ; 7am~12noo,
�
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
� ~
CONTAINS NO HAZ `
^
Signature : _
,
-
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE. RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOX L_
EPPING ., NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 6031679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In —Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket fW : 734408 operator : SS Date = 12/14%1999
Yehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL. IIID. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL. INDUSTRIAL..
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 20.82 TOM'
lime in : 14:34:41 Al
Time Out : 14:44:58
a• . n
Gross Wt : 826860 lbs
Tare Wt : 45220 lbs
Net A - `4164D lbs
»- o _ -
ADMAT 01
Hr:': Mon-Fri : 7am-5pm; $a.t : 7em-12noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONT1411S '1 HA` ARDOUS MP.TE_RIAL.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE: RETURN. CORS'
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOX L.
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 01042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 6031679-25&.
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # : 134371 Operator : KL Date 12/14009
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED CaD
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 11 .00 TONS
Time In : 09:0405
Time Out : 0%17;06
Gross Wt . 8652.0 10
` Tare Wt : 44520 lbs f
idea wt 42000 lbs
I N DO-1 Ott
ADMAT til
Hrs: Mon -tri : 7am--5Pm: Sat-: 7am- 1?Donn
TO THE LEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIv TRUCK
CONTAIN`. NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX, ( 60067q-2526
)67a--2526
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # : 734402 Operator : SS Date 1.2/14/194;
vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL_ IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL. INDUSTRIAL_
Material. : MI:XCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 14,32 TONS
Time In : 13:2418
Time Out : 13:39'.0:'
Gross Wt . 84780 0
Tare Wt : 46140 lbs
Net_-Wt :3040 lbs
19.32 tors
ADMAT #2
Hrs: Mon-Fri : 7am--SOm; Sat : 7am- 1.2noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONTAINS NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP
270 EXETER ROAD , P .G . BOX L.
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FA.X ( 600 )679-2S26
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket ik 734380 Operator : SS Date 12/14/119
vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL INP,. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : PEABODY Units 22.8o TONS
lime In : 10:335:.15
Time Out : 10:46:46
Gross Wt : 91.680 lbs
Tare Wt : 45500 lbs
Net Wt : 45780 lbs
- 22.87 t tons.
ADMAT #2
His : Mone-Fri : 7am-5pw Sat: 7erm-12noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONTAINS NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL.
Signature : - '
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . PDX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 030412
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2S26,
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 4 : 734478 Operator : SS Date 12/15/1999
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL.
Material : MIXCO3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location ; SALEM Units 2535 TONS
Time In : 14:210a
Time Out : 14::31:02
Gross Wt : 96100 10
Tare Wt : 45600 lbs
Net Wt : 50500 l.bs _
25.7.5 tons
AOMAT #2 -
Mrs: Mon-Fri : 7am- 5pm; Sat : 7am- .2noori
TO THE PEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCE;
CONTAINS NO HAZARDOUS MATERIA;_
ignature. : .. ._
-
1
\
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP ,
270 EXETER ROAD , P �O , BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679--2526
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 734462 Operator : SS Date 12/1.5/19?»
^
Vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL. IND. TRUCK
Customer RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Haterial MIXCDS MIXED C&D
\
Source r.4
Location cALEM Units 28.07 TONS
Time In 11:50:11
Time Out 12:16;15
Gross Wt :101740 lbs
Tare Wt 46600 lbs
Net Wt 56140 lbs
28 .07 tons ,
�
AOMAT W/
Hro� Mon—Frii 7mm—Epm; Sat' 7am-12nnun
TO THE BEST OF MY
CONTAINS N
oatur
�
�
�4
ENVIRONMENTAL. RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOY L.
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE_ 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2S26
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket #s : 734497 Operator : KL pate : 12/16/1999
Vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer ; RTS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL.
Material : MIXC03 MIXED CQ
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 24.71 TONS
Time In : 08;09:54
Time Out : 08:20:32
Grass Wt : 95040 As
Tare At : 4.5540 lbs
Net tot : 49500 lbs
24.75 ton.
ADMAT X47
Mr s: Mon-Fri : 7am-5Pm, Sat: 7am-10 oor,
TO THE BEST OF MY Ki "LEDGE THIS I, UC
CONTAINS /1Z :IU �V TERI,' !J
i
Signature '
i
Y
L
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .C . BOX i
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )67q-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In - Charge Seale Ticket
Ticket # 734519 Operator : SS Date : 12✓16/1999
vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK.
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL.
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location . SALEM Units ?7.13 TONS
Time In : 11:04:52
Time Out : 11:20:10
Gross Wt : 99660 lbs
Tare Mt : 45400 lbs
Net Wt : 54260 lbs
27..13 tons
ADMAT 47
Hr s: Mon-Fri : lam-Spm; Sat : Tarn-Qnoori
TO THE: BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE TH TRUCK
ii
CONTAIMS NO HA' MAT`",* At..
signatuA;
s 1. ;•,i
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .G . BOX i..
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 503 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ti.cke'i 734533 Operator : SS Date .12/16/1999
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND.. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIhCO3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 31.37 TONS
Time In , 13:48.30
Time Out : 13:5II:33
Grass Wt :107920 les
Tare Wt : 45180 As
Net Wt : 62740 les
31.37 tons
ADMAT #7
Hrs: Mon-Fri : 7am--5pm; Sat: 7=442-noon
TO THE BEST OF MY K WL.EDPE TH7��JTRU
"i.
i
CONTk:iP15 t0 / U, IHA7R' At
Signat1A 1
p s!
ENVIRONMENTAi., RESOURCE RETURN CARP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O , BOX I_
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 0304.`-_'
PHONE (' 603 )679--2626 FAX ( 603 )679---1526
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket : 734547 Operator : SS Date 12:.16/1999
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer RIS REGIONAL. INDUSTRIAL.
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source . MA
Location SALEM Units 26.'2 TONS
Time In 16.38=312
Tame Out 16:47:26
Gross Wt 98720 .lbs
Tare Wt 45280 lbs
Net 144 53440 lb;:
26,72 tons
ADMAT #7
Hr 7, Mon-Fri : Tarn-Spin; Sat: 7am-12noorr
TO TN`e BEST OFMY t; OWLEDGE T' 'c, TRUCK
CONTAINS NO _ RDOUMA �z
S:1,'PI natrare
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOX L.
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE. 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626)67`x-2626 FAX ( 60S )67q-2S26
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket. # : 734S72 Operator : SS Date :: 12/17/099
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RI'. REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material. : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Unit. 31.58 TONS
Time In : 10:20:51
Time Out : 10:33:31
Gross Wt ::108960 lbs
Tare Wt : 45800 lbs
Net Wt : 6.SI60 lbs
31.58 tons
ADMAT 07
Hrs: Mon--Fri : lam-spm; Sat: 7am-12 ;oon
TO THE BEST OF MY KN /G-1,TH0 nTRU0,
CONTAINS NO H. 0' S HATE
Signature : "' f
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P ,O . BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 01042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 i67q--252_x,
Waste in - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 3i : 734583 Operator : 55 Gate 12/17/1999
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL. IND. 'TRUCK
Cu'stomel RIS REGIONAL. INDUSTRIAL.
Material MIXCD3 MIXED CQ
Source : MA
Location SALEM Units 31.85 TONS
Time In : 13:22:06
Time Out 13:33:36
Gross Wt :108860 lbs
Tare Wt A5160 lbs
Net Wt : 63700 lbs
f 31.85 tons
VIA APMA't TRUCK #7
Hrs: Mc)n-Fri :: 7a77-Spy j; Sat: 7arn-t2(Lan
TO THE BEST OF M'i' KNO , rDGE THIS T., JCV,
1/
CONTAINS NO HA' fERI1I.,; �
.19 n2t;Ur E' :/_Cf•y"S /.: r _._% _5:.:_
k
;;k
ENVIRONMENTAL AL. RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
.270 EXETER ROAD ,, P .O , BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE. ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2S26
Waste In — Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 4 . 734622 Operator . SS Date 12/20/1?91�
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material ; MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source • MA
Location : SALEM Units 27.63 TONS
Time In • 08:54:16
Time Out : 09:04:56
Grass Q 9B380 As
Tare Wt 43120 lbs
Net wt : 55260 lbs r'
27.63 toms
ADMAT #7
Hrs : Mon—Fri : 7am-5Pm; Sat: 7am -12ncoc:n
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
i
CONTAINS NO N TERI�r
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN Corr
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . 'aOX t_
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 0304.2
PHONE: ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In -- Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # : 73464.1 Operator : SS (late :2/20/1999
Vehicle -' R! ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIXC03 MIXED C&D
Source MA
Location SALEM Units 27.23 TONS
Time Iii 1149:46
Time Out 12:12:23 �
Gross Wt 96600 As
"fare Wt 42140 lbs
Net Wt 54460 lbs
27.23 tons
ADMAT #7
Hrs: Mon--Fri, : 7am—Spm; Sat_: 7am- 12noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TPUCK
CONTAINS n;0 HAZ Gt) . MPT,ERI
r �
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P �O � BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )879~2526
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 4 ; 734632 Operator : So Date 12/20/1999
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : KIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material ; MIXCD? MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 27�09 TONS
Time In : 10:46:88
Time Out : 10;55:57
Gross Wt 97260 lbs
Taro Wt 43080 The
Net W\ 54180 We
~
ADMA7 42
Hro; Mon—Fri : 7am~5pm; Sat ; 7am- 12nonn
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONTAINS NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Signaturo�
°^ ^
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P _O . BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 }670--2526
Waste In — Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 4 : 734720 Operator : SS Date 12/21/1999
Vehicle : R'I ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIYCD3 MIXED 00
Source : MA
Location SALEM Units 20.29 TONS
Time In : 15:0808
Time Out : 15:20:13
Groes Wt 87040 lbs
Tare Wt = 46460 lbs
Net Wt 40580 lbs
20„29 tons
ADMAT #2
r
Hrs : Mon—Fri : 7am--5pm;7&at : 7am-12noon
TO 'THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONTEMNS NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Signature : __C. � '�— ^
'
ENVIRONMENTAL. RESOURCE RETURN CORP ,
270 EXETER ROAD , P .D . BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679~2526
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 0 : 735299 Operator : 5S Date 01/06/2080
Velinlp : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material nIKCD3 MIXED C&D
Source MA
Location SALEM Units 29.07 TONS
Time In 15�51:45
Time Out 16:06:19
Gross Wt :102780 lbs
Tare Wt � 44640 lbs
Net Wt : 58140 ]ba
29.07 tons
` *
ADMAT #2
Mrs: Mnn~Fri � 7am~5pm; S.at; 7am^12noun
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONTAINS NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Signature:
`
'
^
° . '
L, • r
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . BOY. L
EPPING . NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )6-/9-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In - Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # 735285 Operator : KL Date 01/06/2000
Vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location SALEM Units 23.52 TONS
Time In 14:12:03
Time Out : 14:26:10
Gross 10 : 92980 lbs
Tare wt : 45940 lbs
Net Wt : 47040 lbs
23.52 tons
VIA ADMAT TRUCK #7
. Hrs: Mon-Fri - 7am-5Pm; Sat : 7am-12noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KN O L DGE THIS TR -K
CONTAINS NO H us ERIAL'
Signature : � '
1
/
�
j
1
�
|
�
�
/
�
\
�
|
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
i
279 EXETER ROAD , P .O . 88X L .
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042 i
PHONE ( 609 )679~2626 FAX ( 603 )679`2526
�
|
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket !
Ticket 73527? Operator : 5S Date : 01/06/2008 �
~—^
�
Vehicle RI ANY REGIONAL IND, TRUCK
Customer z RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIXCD MIXED C&D
Source UA
Location 'SALEM Unita ; 17 .87 TUNS
. Time In 13:01:46
Time Out : 13:11:11
+ � ~^+
Gross Wt 79660 lbs »
Tare Wt 43920 lbs
/ NetWt : 35740 }bo
'~—^~` 17�87 tons
,
" *
AUUAT #1
Hra� Mon—Fri : 7am-5Pm; Sat : 7am-12noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
CONTAINS
`
5i0nature :
*^+
Reprinted Ticket
�
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O . 80K L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket 0 w 735374 Operator : 55 Date 81/07/2000
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND, TRUCK
Customer ; RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source ; MA
.
Location SALEM Units 25.88 TONS
lime In 14:59:16
Time Out 14:50:33
'
Gross W! 95260 lbs
Taro Wt 43508 lbs ^* ~
Net Wt 51760 lbs
25.88 tons
° ~
`
AOMAT 01
Hra: Mon—Fri : 7am~5pm; Sit : 7am~12nnon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUQ
CONTAINS M
Signature; ,
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P �O BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679-2626 FAX ( 603 )671^2S26
.`
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # : 735347 Operator : S5 Date 01/07/2000
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL I .O. !RUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : MIXCD3 MIXED C&D
Source : MA
Location : SALEM Units 30� 37 TONS
Time In : 11:28:12
Time Out : 11:39:39
Gross N! :105460 IN ` w
Tare Wt � : 44720 As �
Net Wt : 60740 lbs
' 30,37-tonu
" ~
AOhAT 41
Mrs: Mon—Fri : 7am-5Pm; Sat: 7am-12nnon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS TRUCK
, CONTAINS NO hAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Signature ;
\
�
|
`
` ~
�
�
,
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RETURN CORP .
270 EXETER ROAD , P .O � BOX L
EPPING , NEW HAMPSHIRE 03042
PHONE ( 603 )679~2626 FAX ( 603 )679-2526
Waste In ~ Charge Scale Ticket
Ticket # : 735379 OpeFator : S3 Date 01/07/2000
Vehicle : RI ANY REGIONAL IND. TRUCK
Customer : RIS REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL
Material : UIXCO3 MIXED C&D
Source z MA
Location : SALEM Units 22.84 TOMS
Time In : 15:4207
Time Out : 1503:49 �
Gross Wt t 89780 As
Tare W1 : 44100 As
Net Wt v 45680 As
22.84 tons
`
AOUAT 07
\
Hra; Mon-Fri : 7am-5pm; Sat ; 7am~12noon
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS
CONTAINS
Signature ; -
`
`
"'APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCU)i C702 (instructions on re,cSe Sid(. PAC, Olaf p+ 1 PACS
TO (OWNER-: City of Salem P ,OiEC.Reference f 1-12•;0 APPLICATION NO 3 Distribution lo.
Finance/Auditing Purchase Order * 00022750-00
93 Washington Street PERIOD TC
01131/00 E AR�ARCHIT
HI7LC'
Salem, KA 01970 C CONTRACTO;.
FRO'm (CON'R4CTORr:Regional Industrial Serb. 1'IA fARCr::TECI, ARCHITECTS
79 Hixon Street PROJECT NO:
Bellingham, MA 02019
CONTRACT FOR. Flynn Tan Building CONTRACT DATE:September $, 1939
Aplitin
CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Continue iion Sheet,n Is madefor AIA Document 6703, is atPayment, as shownotacheoconnect,on with the Contract.
CHANGE ORDER SUMMAR\ 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM . ... .. .,. $ -1472222.22
j Change Orders approved it. I ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONi 2. Net change by Change Orders ....... . . .. . .... . . . . S _ 63,800-00
Previous months b) Owner 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 s 2. . . . . . S 211 9022,22
'k_ TOTai 4, TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE . . . . . S .206,072-72
Approved this Month I (Column G on
G703-
5. RETAINAGE:Number IDate Approved
a. 0 % of Completed Work S 0
l ~31/29/99 1 $ 43,$00 (Column D+ E on G703,
, b. � °a of Stored Material S 0
2. 112/14/99 $ 20,000 I (Column F on G703)
Total Retainage {Line Sa + Sb o-
TOTALS $ 63 $00 Total in Column l of 0703 _ . _ _ f 0
t. Net c_ hanpf by Change Orders - 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ... , . f 206,022.22
The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knov,led6c (Line 4 less Line S Total)
information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR
completed In accordance with the Contract Documents. that all amounts have beer. PAYMENT (line 6 from prior Cenfica:ei. . . S 175,000.00
Paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were 6. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .. ...-...__. .. . ... ., s 31,022.22
issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown 9• BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE . .... ..... . . . S 5,000.00
herein is now due. (Line 3 less Line 6)
CONTRACTOR: Regional Industrial Services, Corp. State of: Massachusetts County of: Norfolk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this -A I "I day of of 74 r"U.:"
Notary Public: B"IMNNAaRWN -�
By: _9 f"' t Date; _.�y1 •�`I Li�Z1 My Commission expires: NOTARYPUBUC "
3Tl�'
ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CERTIFIED. S .%�� GL z?-_
(Attach exptana(io rf amu hied itfers from the amount applied for.(
In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and theARCHITECT '
data comprising the above application,the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the v
best of the Architect's knowledge,information and belief the Work has progressed as B}: Date:
indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents,and This rtaicate is otiable. he AMOUNT CERTIFIED is paya le only to the
the Contractor is entitled Iu payment of the AMOU':' CERTIFIED.
Contractor name a ein. Issuance,payment andacceptance of payment are without
prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract.
AIA rJ✓1APf'l ir.i
CONIMLIATION SHEIT AtAl>C1CUht1 Art C.(R PACI 2 of 2 P�
AIA Doc t:ncrilG70', APPLICAI ION AND CfRlI I ICAlf f OR t.AYMP\i_ con;,rmng APPi IC Al ION NUNIF R 3
Cowfaclor's signed Cetlificatton Is altachr'd APPI ICA]ION DA1f:.lan. 31, 2000
In Iahufatfnn,below, amormn are stalest in dte nearc,t doP.,: P[RIO, I kc)*1, 01/01/99
Use Column I pn Cnniracf, where vanob!c rela,ngc foi lim lien'.• n;, 10_ 01/31100
ARCH11fC1'S PRO1fC1 NO:
B
U G N
—� � t•.,».r. R,•.tiflt7Ei: ,C't AI CUh�h('l O'
,:i Di SC K,I'1 {tV
(If WCAP, .t H1(,I :!;, I 8c-IANC' F!7nJ 5Ci
11, Ap), ,ew, . ASI ,ICAI(I
N, 1i1 10061C,-C, ,ocltit,.
tA'aw,a , ID+N fI - ,C f
i - Inr. m D or fl
r1. Asbestos Abatement $ 932800 1 $ 93,800 0 0 93,8001100! $ 0 I$ 0
i2. Demolition $117,222.21 $ 811200 $ 31,022.22 0 $112,222.22 96l $ 5,000 0
I I i
i i I
i
i I
I ' '
i
I I I
I
f
I
I�
$2111022.22 175,000 $ 31,022.22 0 $206,022.22 $ 5,000 $ 0
OjWV
JAMES J.WELCH&CO INCORPORATED
CONTRACTORS and ENGINEERS
15 Front Street,Salem,Mass.01970
617-744-93001322-8080 .
September 13, 1976
Mr. Jack Powers
Building Inspector
City of Salem
City Hall
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Sir:
On August 24, 1976 in response to a call from your
Department I investigated a fire gutted structure on
Boston Street known as Flynn Tanning Co. My examination
of the remaining structure involved half- standing walls ,
as well as floor areas. I certify that in my opinion
demolition of such. was immediately necessary in the
interest of public safety.
Very. truly yours ,
J J. WELCHCO. , INC.
J Norman Welch, J .
JNWJr. : jc
�"0.n,�
e �
S AfWE^
�C
(9itg of '19alrut, ffiazsar4usrt#9
P ryartnrent of Public Porks
orte jittlem Breen
ANTHONY V. FLETCHER, R.P.E. RICHARD P. SWENSON, C.E.
CITU ENGINEER Assistant Engineer
August 26, 1976
Mr. John Powers
Building Inspector
City of Salem
One Salem Green
Salem, MA.
RE: Fire Damage - Flynn Leather, Boston Street
Dear Mr. Powers:
In compliance with provisions of Chapter 143, Section 8
of the General Laws, 124. 3 of the Massachusetts State Building
Code, I herewith submit the following.
The fire damaged structure was inspected by me on August
24th, during the course of the fire and I concufred with the
acting Chief that demolition of the Boston Street wall and
general debris removal from the street should be instituted
immediately to assist in fighting the fire and for public safety.
This was accomplished on August 25th. A subsequent inspection
was made with you and the acting Chief relative to the demolition
of the elevator shaft and the West parapet wall. I reccomend that
and require that the shaft and parapets be demolished as soon as
possible to insure the safety of firemen still at the scene, and
the pdedstrians and traffic on Boston Street.
Respectfully
Submitted,
A. V. Fletcher, P. E.
City Engineer
AVF/cc
CITY OF SALEM - MASSACHUSETTS
WILLIAM J. LUNDREGAN Legal Department JOHN D. KEENAN
City Solicitor g3 Washington Street Assistant City Solicitor
e1 Washington Street SalemMassachusetts 01970 15 Church Street
,
Tel:978-741-3888 Tel:978-744-8500
Fax:978-741-8110 Fax:978-744-0111
September 24, 1998
ROMANOVIIZ & MANNING
H. Drew Romanovitz, Esq.
25 Lynde Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
RE: City of Salem v, Jan Exman
Docket 9836 CR
Trial Seotember 24, 1998
Dear Attorney Romanovitz:
Judge Wexler entered a default on this matter today as neither counsel nor
defendant were present. If you are going to represent, I am happy to discuss
some sort of plea to wrap it up now that EPA has cleaned site and everyone has
moved out.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very b st regards,
John Keenan, Esq.
Jdk/kjm
08J10J99 TIDE 15:00 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN Q1009"009
Citp of &arem, a !55atbuoetto
VuWc Agrapertp Mepartment
3suil0ing mepartament
One 94tem Orren
(978)7439595 9xl, 380
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer
April 22 , 1998
Salem Realty, LLC
Jan Exman
66 Old Blue Hills Road
Durham, Ct . 06422
RE: UNSAFE STRUCTURES - NOTICE TO MAKE SAFE
80 Boston Street
Dear Mr . Exman:
inspection:
On Thursday, April 16 , 1998 , I conducted an inspection of
the property located at 70-92 Boston Street, was conducted
in accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code
780 CMR 121 . 1 and 121 . 2 (unsafe structures ) . Accompanying
us were . members of the E. F .A„ and the Salem Fire
Department .
Findings :
The inspection conducted confirmed that the building was
found to be in a state of considerable disrepair, damaged
by fire , exposed to the elements, structural supports
damaged and missing, open holes in floors and ceilings,
exitways bolted shut or tompletely blocked, hazardous
waste storage , open holes in ground storage tanks on the
exterior of the building, and areas of the floor and roof i
collapsing.
Our inspection also found five illegal businesses renting
space on the property . These businesses were storing both
flammable and hazardous materials within their spaces and
we discovered evidence that they are contaminating the
site with these materials .
u
08/10/99 TUE 15:08 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN fm007/009
wIwAMJ.LUNOAEc�w CITY OF SALEM - MASSACHUSETTS
Ci Solicitor Legal Department JOHN D.KEENAN
City 93 Washington Street Assistant city solicitor
91 Washington Street Salem, IV1d99t1ChUse1[s 01970 18 Church Street
TBI:97e-741.3000 Tel;978-744.0500
Fax:978.741.8110 Fax:970.744.0111
VIA FAX& FIRST CLASS MAIL:
745-0261
April 23, 1998
ROMANOVITZ&MANNING
H. Drew Romanovitz, Esq.
25 Lynde Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
RE: City of Salem v. Jan Exman
Docket 9836 CR
PTC—April 291h
Dear Attorney Romanovitz:
Please find enclosed Notice to Make Safe the unsafe structure captioned above—the
former FlynnTan property. As I am sure you are aware, the EPA inspected the premises
last week and found several hazardous conditions.
The pending criminal complaint is scheduled for next Wednesday, April 29'h for PTC
Do you know if either Mr. Exman or his potential buyers plan on making clean up
proposals any time soon?
Very bes regards,
1 D.Keenan, Esq.
Id m
Enc
08/10/99 TUE 18:05 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN QI006/009
60)
CITY OF SALEM • MASSACHUSETTS
WILLIAM J.LUNOREGANJOHN O.KEENAN
Gly Solicitor
Legal department
at WasNngtort Street 8'd Washington Street Aui4tent qty Solicitor
80 Wa9hingtDit Street
791.978-7413$38 Salem, MmaChuSeft 01570 TBI:978.74114453
Far 978.741.3110 Fax:973-740%0e72
February 25, 1999
ROMANOVrrZ & MANNING
H. Drew Romanovitz, Esq.
25 lynde Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
RE: 70-92 Boston Street— FlynnTan Property
Dear Attorney Romanovitz.
Please be advised that the City of Salem will be inspecting the above captioned
property on Wednesday, March 3, 1999 due to safety concems. The City has
received several complaints from neighbors pertaining specifically to the wooden
structure. The City has taken the safety precaution of boarding up the lower
windows. Please inform Mr. Exman that he is welcome to attend this inspection
with Building inspector Strout and other city departments. Inspector Strout can
be reached at 978.745.9595.
If Mr. Exman does not attend the inspection, the report and order of expected
action, if any, will be forwarded.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Veryb st egards,
Joh . Keenan,
Ass s nt City Solicitor
Jd m
cc. Peter Strout, Bldg. Inspector
Jan Exman
08/10/89 TUE 15:05 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN 005/060
�'lLay zna & Cj
ATTORNiYS E COUNSELLORS AT LAW
25 LYNDE STREET
5ALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 019703432
(978)745 5151
fAX (978)745.0261
H. DREW ROMANOVITZ CHARLES F. MANNING, DECEA5ED
March 05, 1999
John D. Keenaa
Cory of Salem Massachusetts
Legal Department
93 Washington Street
Salem,Ma 01970
Dear MT.Keenan:
Please be advised that our firm does not represent Mr.Exman.
Kindly forward all further correspondence to him directly.
V truly yours,
vitz
HD)L/ya
08/10/99 TUE 15:05 FAX 9787400072 JOHN U KEENAN 2004/009
Page Two of Two
June , 1999
Mr. Jan Exman
NOTICE OF DEMOLITION
Demolition.-
Due
emolition:Due to your continued refusal and/or neglect to make safe or take down this
property, this office will proceed to carry out the demolition of this structure and
shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with adjacent grades by an
Inorganic fill. The costs and charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the
land upon which the structure is located and shall be enforced in an action of
contract. Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR 121.5; Massachusetts
General Laws, Chapter 143, § 9 and Massachusetts General laws, Chapter 139,
§ 3A). Due to need to removal hazardous waste (asbestos), demolition will cost
approximately $125,000.00. See attached copies of work orders and estimate.
Demolition will begin 3uly 01999.
Please contact this office immediately upon receipt of this letter.
Sincerely,
Peter Strout, Building Inspector
ENC.
CC. Mayor Stanley J. Usovicz, Jr.
Leonard O'Leary, Ward 4 Councilor, Council President
William Lundregan, City Solicitor
John Keenan, Assistant City Solicitor
Albert Hili, Jr., Purchasing Agent
08;10/99 TUE 15:04 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN Z003/009
DRAFT/SAMPLE
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL: !t
June , 1999
Jan Exman
Salem Realty, LLC
66 Old Blue Hill Road
Durham, Cr 06422
RE: NOTICE OF DEMOLITION
70-92 Bosun 5trraet, Salem, MA
FlynnTan Property
Dear Mr. Exman.
Inspection:
On Wednesday, March 3, 1999 an inspection of the property located at 70-92
Boston Street, the former FlynnTan building, was conducted in accordance with
the Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR 121.4. (Failure to remove or
make structure safe, survey board, survey report)(See attached copy).
Accompanying us were, Assistant City Engineer Michael Collins, Fire Chief Robert
Turner and Mr. John Jennings, a disinterested Independent contractor.
findings:
The survey conducted confirmed that the abandoned building was found to be in
a state of considerable disrepair, exposed to the elements, [list conditions
observed]. . . especially unsafe in case of fire (Fire Department will not send men
into it—surrounding properties 28 Goodhue, Salem Oil &Grease, wooden
structure, close proximity to residences)
Failure to Correct:
You were ordered by this office to remove or make safe said unsafe structure per
Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR 121.3 by correspondence on April
22, 1998. (Removal or making structure safe)(See attached copy). You have
failed to comply with that order. In fact, you also falled to show up for the
criminal trial on September 24, 1998 regarding various use violations at said
property.
i
08/10/99 TUE 15:04 FA% $787400072 JOHN D KEENAN 2002/009
Legal 1
John Keenan,
Assistant i •
• t Washington Street
♦ ♦ t
Memo
To; Pete
Fraena John
Date: 28 MAYi4t--
Re ftnnTan
Peter.
I am not aware of us having served Mr, tcxman with copy of inspection. I have drafted attached letter
for your review. With 2e Goodhue becoming vacant need week I believe it is becoming even more
important to demolish this structure as soon as possible. We should seek bids appropriately through AI
HAI (aver $101),000 will have to go into central registet). We also treed to know where money
($125,000.150.000)Coming from.
This is high on Maya's and SolldWs priority fist,
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very hest regards,
JDK
POWNAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
JAN ExMAN ( Pfu �
66 OLD BLUE Hats Ro.
DURHAM,CT. 06422 (860)349.1940
•Page 1
I
08/10/99 TUE 15:04 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN 2001/009
Sixty Washington Street
City Legal - • Salem, Massachusetts 019
John D. Keenan
Tel: 978-741-4453
' . Fax: 978-740-0072
Fax
To: Peter Strout From: John Keenan
Fam 74044 Pages: 9
Phorre: 978-741-4153 Date: 10 AUG 99
Re: FlynnTan CC:
❑Urgent X For Review O Please Comment Please Reply ❑Please Recycle
e Comments;
Peter.
Per our discussion,please find attached draft Demolition Notice. This should definitely go certified mal.
I did notify him of the inspection. Kevin sent him a letter back in April 1998. He has done nothing—
even defauted at tial.
You need to flesh out findings from inspection. Also, please specify cost of demolition.
You should also inform him of date of demolition.
If you want me to review after you draft,please fax to my attention.
Very best regards,
John
E
JOHN DEERE INSURANCE COMPANY
GENERAL STATUS INQUIRY
To IrCity d S616m Ori`e Salem Green, Salem"MA 01970 Attentions Purchasing
""
a Departtnent �
Bond # 0707 91.42 ",
Contractor iRegional9lndustrial Services;
Project Description .Demolition of Budding at 80 Boston Street `' "3
Contract Pnce<< � ; Bond Amount ., Effective Date Completio Date
As the Surety Company representative on the above bond,we need to determine the
status of the above referenced project. Status Inquiries will be sent out intermittently
until the project has been satisfactorily completed. Please complete one of the sections
below with the appropriate information. Once the form has been completed, signed and
dated, please return this form to my attention at your earliest possible opportunity to the
fax number listed below. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
FAX TO- ATTENTION: CAROL ANDREWS at (860) 674-8104
Or please return it by mail in the preaddressed envelope provided.
CONTRACT IS COMPLETE:
Date of Completion O p 06 Date of Acceptance: S/, Er
Final Contract Price / a,-Has Contractor been paid in full?
(If no,please explain.)
Was work completed satisfactorily? (Ifno, please explain.) ye.S
CONTRACT/S INCOMPLETE:
Revised total contract value to date is:
Percent Completed to Date
Total Amount Paid Contractor to Date
Total Retainage to Date
Anticipated Completion Date
Are Labor and Materials Bills Being Paid by Contractor(If no,Explain.)
How is the Work Progressing (On schedule, Behind schedule- Explain.)
REMARKS:
1. 417 fl
Completed By: Date: x o/
Title: Phone: 97F- 7ys � Tx3Fd
^Y .
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT 0702 (instructions on reverse side) PAGEoNt of PAGES 2
TO (OWNER): City of Salem PROJECTReference # 1-1240 APPLICATION NO: 2 Distribution to:
Finance/Auditing Purchase Ord e� QQ 7� 0 n OWNER
93 Washington Street PERIOD TO: 12/31/99 0 ARCHITECT
Salem, MA 01970 - 0 CONTRACTOR
FROM (CONTRACTOR):Regional Industrial. Serv. VIA (ARCHITECT): DEC 20 1999 ARCHITECT'S 0
79 Hixon Street PROJECT NO: p
Bellingham, MA 02019 FINANCE DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT FOR: Flynn Tan Building CONTRACT DATE:September 8, 1999
elow, in
CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Continaua lion Sheet,n is madefAIA or Document G703,Pment, astisatttached connection with the Contract,
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... S 147,222.22
2. Net change by Change Orders .....:............... S 63 L800.
Change Orders approved ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS 211.022 22
previous months by Owner 0 0 3, CONTRACT SUM TO GATE (Line 1 ±2) . .. ........... $
TOTAL 4. TOTAL COMPLETED &STORED TO DATE............ S 175,000.
Approved this Month (Column G on G703)
5RETAINAGE:
, 0
Number Date Approved a. U— % of Completed Work $
1 11/29/99 43,800 0 (Column D+E on 6703)
2 12/24/99 20,Otk} 0 b. % of Stored Material S 0
(Column F on G703)
Total Retainage (Line Sa+5b or 0
TOTALS 63,800 0 Total in Column I of 6703) ..... .. .. ............ $
Net change b Chane Orders 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ................. .. S 175,000•
The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, (Line 4 less Line 5 Total)
information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR 50 000.
completed in accordance with the Contract Documents,that all amounts have been PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)......... $
paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were B. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE . ... ...................... S 125',000
issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown 9, BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE ............. S
herein is now due. (Line 3 less Line 6)
CONTRACTOR: State of: Massachusetts County of: �k SSe
Subscribed andsw rn to'b fore me thi 16 day afDecember ,1999
12/16/99 Notary Public: s }ATF c mrv�
By: Date: My Commission expires: a� g606 LL
ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CERTIFIED............ .....................
(Attach explanatio 'f amou c rtifi differs from the amount applied for,)
In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the ARCHITECT:
data comprising the above application,the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the �.
best of the Architect's knowledge,information and belief the Work has progressed as By: Date:
indicated,the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents,and This C nificate is not egotiab . The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is p gable only to the
the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. Contractor named herein.Issuance,payment and acceptance of payment are without
prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract.
AIA onruk¢NT CM-AITI ICATIr-l"Aln c,i -,r!,r,, rno nm e,..a Tvip .:v.. . nm+
r CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT 0703 PACE 2 OF 2 PAGES
AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing APPLICATION NUMBER: 2
Contractor's signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION DATE: 12/16/99
In tabulations below, amounts are stated to .he nearest dollar. PERIOD FROM: 11/01/99
Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. TO: 12/31/99
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:
4 R C D F f C H I
WORK COMPLETED TOTAL COMPLETED
ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED, This Application AND STORED 1 BALANCE RETAINAGE
TO FINISH
d
No. VAI UE Previous TO DATE IG+CI
Appkin,ons Work in Place StoreMaterials (D+E+F) IC—GI
(not in D or f)
1 Asbestos Abatement ' 93,800 50,000 43,800 0 93,800 100% 0 0
2 Demolition 117,222.22 0 81,200 0 81,200 69% 36,022.22 0
-- l
211,022,22 50,000 125,000 0 175,000 36,622.22 0
AIA nnruMfNT fVnt ' rONTINITATtnN (MITT • APRII 1970•PDITInN • 01 "1"
JAN-04-00 12 ;49 PM REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL SERV 505. 966 3223 P`. 02
REGIONAL INDUSTRIALRIS SERVICES CORPORATION
TEL: (5061966-9121
FAX: (308) 956-3223
1
January 4, 2000 Ds'rOju
City of Salem'•
Mr, Frank D!Paolo
py
I Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Additional Asbestos Debris at Flynn Tan Site,Salem, MA
Dear Frank.,,
Phis letter is to confirm our conversation,af January 3,.2000. The above
p
referenced work will be performed under DEP Waiver #00001993 and is
scheduled to.begin on Wednesday, January 3, 10601
The following is the information to be conta 7d in Change Order Number
Three:
1. Option 11 from ;he letter dated December 30; 1999. z
11, To extend the End Date of the Project to January 30, 1000. ,
Ill. To include the additional cost of down time for two excavators on the
following dates:
December 27, 1999 $ 1,500
December 18, 1999 $ 1,500
December 29, 1999 $ 1,500
January 03,-1000 $ 1,500-
January
1;500"January 04, 2000 S150
Total 2-($ 7,,5
`'Please sign and return via fax so e may proceed as scheduled.
Submctted B}!
abed E. B l Accepted By _ _
p rvhernr Frank DiPaotO
'P.O. BOX 459 • 79 HIXON STREET BELLINGHAM, MA02019
JAN-04-00 12 :49 PM REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL SERV 508 966 3223 P. 01
REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL RIS SERVICES CORPORATION
TEL, 16061966-3121
WAX. 17061 966 $223
OP404 ON
D L L
NO OF PAGES Incl, Cover
ATTN... wr`�
--a
e
SUBJECT; "y c
NOTES:
Please Call(508) 966-3121 ?f you do not receive all pages.
Thank you,
PO. PDX 499 • 7*i mxnN STRFrT • RFI I INC-,HAM M6 n?MIH
its
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INVESTIGATION
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAW CHAPTER 21E
AT
80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
SUBMITTED TO:
JOHN FLYNN & SONS
80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
SUBMITTED BY:
SP ENGINEERING, INC.
27 CONGRESS STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
NOVEMBER 1988
•
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
William H. Mitchell Leo T. Keefe , P.E.
Field Engineer/Geologist Professional Engineer
�4
0.x
1
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
Page
I . Introduction 1
Figure:
1. Locus Plan
2. Site Plan
2A. Site Plan
2B. Site Plan
II. Assessment Rationale 1
III . Methods 5
IV. Surface and Subsurface Geology 5
V. Tanis Information 8
VI. Site Use and History 9
VII . Areas of Concern 11
• VIII . Soil and Water Analysis Summary 14
IX. DEQE Spill Fife Review 16
X. Conclusions 17
Barrel Inventory for Disposal 22
Figure :
3 . Soil Logs
4. Soil Logs
5. Soil Logs
Tables:
1. Metals Analysis
2. EP Tox Soil Analysis
3 . Volatile Organics Analysis
4. Volatile Organics Analysis
I . Introduction
The property being investigated is located at 80 Boston
Street , Salem, Massachusetts . The front side of the property
abuts Boston Street and the back side abuts Goodhue Street. The
property covers 1. 67 acres , which includes a brick , -one to
three-story structure occupying approximately 60 percent of the
site , with the remaining 40 percent being either asphalt ori
concrete. The site houses two major parking lots , one to the
northwest and the remaining one being to the opposite southeast
corner . The property is totally enclosed with a chain-link
fence.
On November 7 , 1988 , a site investigation of the subsurface
was conducted by SP Engineering , Inc . under the supervision of
• William H. Mitchell Jr . , Field Engineer/Geologist. ^ In-house
barrel inventory, review of process activities and present waste
handling was supervised by Bruce M. Poole , President of SP
Engineering , Inc.
II. Assessment Rationale
The building and surrounding property has been subjected to
a comprehensive investigation to determine whether hazardous
waste materials and/or oils have been released or are contained
or located ; on the site or in the soil or groundwater . This
report summarizes the conditions encountered on the buildings ,
grounds and subsurface soils , and groundwater . The
• certification of materials and soils sampled involves the
Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations for
` ( ` 11'n 0 ,.. • II I d , '� 411`:' Yi ,'
/ �f .�. : ( (I1 lel f'I _ lig 1 ��- er � I II t♦I I� i'.
,
tine Ili vi
I-�: I n ,� \ ¢ l ry is C it V 1 I1 , L� j l /'1 n L / ' �J 4l�In _ �7,!„•
\ ':! ;T N ilt ,h,r IIS lu.l 1 f.y„ ;.I 1. :•` 1 n• I / � � , / S y.,l ¢ \-I��.y L�93
1";"I, H II
I '�.V nitei5 .1�� 0 �II.
�I SII 'I df'�p, 1 !` e� 4 ,.•Y RM
i:\ I T P I<Cj( I��au\ �e' N 131st a
)IN
Il• 1 f'Out 1111 . 'Pot woa� I \' n `R \ • .P
\ � ���� II � I � 1`� �, �• en � � II NI yI , I le:� 13 Y�dk I;
, u ♦ � � l°P 11 � � � i ( N � A
1 C YI C um! ! \
II{ I rl i. ,. \ 1 I .(s. 1 •Ps 1 �i ¢ 1<. 01
BE 171
pl 1 11,111 fell RANI h`, _ \\ 111 IIL ...n II t , I 1 '�� .y`' \\\\\\,,�1,,_..,,`a1 ' •� I <�-
s(11 )•tur� I � 0\-')"\�(�
v,i tN,uw ' \ tl �e SII 11r \ Il �'/ ''F1d � tnle 111 1I \ / i i.
o. �* : x HA R
,...�3Ux11
Q/t ut I rl r I rn: o" .0.I t I;'I s 1(f. I r j ��'cenlgwn '=,a •�:,�
71MAn 1111 . 11 I ,'. '1 t9n, 1� 1 nnn
ni 6 hl / h I�te nl lrnr
,� 11 I-' I �f�� mv. 1 1- I,
11�
r , \ I S lf,
�Ir(,:hl � fel - % I� li 1�i �I�� �y� � �o�j Y� �L
Ai
I del �..� Orl . t..
1 „J ,�6 I � -T nhtnac � I (� � ul� � 1 ',..� i� ��'��° �� �' I � I ll k SIM ��1 A, � •.In ld rl '.�'71 i �d y r � ��'7/ r I� w�..` '.. �
tIr,S,t'IC�
1 Me..'L
'( / ��t Fnu
��IJ , ' �� y �y, ,j 4 ..';, ! ,< vY rl .•q I ��/ '�'r/ �' 1�1 li a� �) f�eX�1Y;
QCP IA. f1V� I � I./ �!..�le � 44Nr r'I At. t OCU 1 61
f, I ' A-�� 'r 1 , II'T•,
,A 1 n . ❑M It 4 1 t
.. � i�� \ `:4111'NI,H..f� � ;A• r y'; : � .�.( 1f / ' �tlnrm�yA n.�l � xi11 � l � n i./. r � � �' �/�`� hFrZ.,+ ��•
, ".. .✓ Il k
V '�,I ¢ i 111 �� WI 11 ill / � '.. t'Y1/ , It1 y�q� 111G a>`,r-., nv.. , r ) ! .• �.l I,. I � ti 1,�,� bh c ¢'�� ` � 'i:O OOH.
em /I1. ���>r
11 'L@ u,5 S' Illk lS�lI I fY ,.
I1M� �i Phlky ¢1 � rJ M �(\ Cmme � i \ Salem
,Fh(Ilhn 1 L) R
I � 1, .`\ �l ✓ .A 11 Oul: 1 1 „t � V N�tli. 1 % I b. �_ :•� I'�
yy�� • M I n,� re Ma 1)�¢/pp
�. I �� ', OI ..M �.i �, rr n�•m in A ..: � U '�t��` t :,4 1 Y�SIJu�1x � IIII IJI I uur�lll l�r PnA�� � 1I11U� If���gs--_,;.
11y' �'.,��� ,I
�i 1 ,�tl. \ �) �� •���: , eul, .� :4',f y,•� f ( �r) I�r '( ' I {` S' t It by -k�� Ia
1 It
,EFB� IAV
` , �.�' ���I . ���'
\s -
PI 11 Y I.^ -r I 1
- 1 ` P 91., I¢J......
OII, f u! 3Yl: Alh .3:1
l I I II I r .. l r [ •VIt " � ' r;�l ra, f I '� �° '- y 1 �aLA v 4
I ;� e«::"Ilna l f,l �� .' .� 4� I q1l nr � Ia . p';1 �, h �l� Y' ., �I SIe /� A �� ISI 32�r r
Ir il:l rely 1 - fI� , Il 1 1 WIr
t I s, l r �I 111.
P1. o 'T
playY,Gund
I I ( X1,11111 , i - �t �V ��: I � : � �1 ( I in ��LT �� I:u'i ` �'.'���� ) 1V111 I' :n f � a f� 'iN , il�. � ♦.�� �11 fld- II rl I ..,
14!.IINII rF Sunr
It I 1 I .'�1llrll,lllf'Y z u,lr, � 1 \ I I rew ,n.nv
.A. ✓ I / : I L ��a li ` �IIr:`I A ' I Ij I' ?' ( 1: q �;, 11 l'f.'
' � 1 � �, I .ly, r r I r: U (',•'4 � / : .FI�/ �\ ,A � 1 I .i�l �`.�VbHd � r{ I r I 7� 'I,pl f• I 'ate'+ I
J i r p . .d:,Y , I�
( ,... ! ( '� • 1� � �\ ePalm� f�`
fi /�:I / (l 1'. l'L�yr !�. N 1 y Ink, (7 li 4 1 r�l�� �1 Y ~ /-
1 I ' I �h uilel l 14 1 1 l
li 'I� , U '� •. Y �.� 1{i �"�� I� I
i. 1/ 7 F I lym � . A 1 Yl � til' ¢/'' �p. I\ " �Iie
r�
v e- i �. ¢;� ✓'ll/ ! IS i� VSII N' FIGURE 1f����rr J ��CI Ye��.�l 'i �¢IIfIL 1�� I�.��� f� ��e'
�� II �s ` r ,`.,' yi I 1 I� t �� ♦r+ 4�!�� x '�4• J \
�� ji'-°P,�
Fo � \
l SI H,¢..;r
ICker
I� `l lg
" 1 �1 1._ W I , ',"� it o •�I I � � (l.ih .i� l y' � � �, i I , 11 ( (p�
Ti 0. m �nr.Ynq
41 I�.t:u , i! it �� ,.'{ .tfl& 1`F'Ot•. /
x N
W`
_ _ e of No. 6 Fuel _
S -1- R E E T r'ExtentOilContamination
TON / ; o� Store and apartment building
B 0S -
ii
/ 6 �L 20,000 Gallon
No. 6 Fuel Oil
BORE(TypicaU U/G Tank
Dunkin Donuts Parking Lot Edge of Parking
Building Lott
' •4 •3 Steep grade
8 • a , (2) 275 Gal. W. 2
• _ ti Fuel Oil A/G Tanks Residence
Solvent Contamination `l
Property Line 7• 10,000 Gal. No.6 Fuel Oil
(Typical) , ,
��Tank-Abandoned
Auto body shop Residence
6,000 Gal. U/ ;
Q /�� Solvent\Td k j
T , Bldg. f
(3) 275 Gallon A/G Tanks , ; Probable No. 6 Fuel
G O •2 Oil Contamination ,
O / , LJ
D
HU ,
S T R E E T
Property at : 80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MA Scale: I"= 40' SITE PLAN
FIGURE 2A
S P, INC.
- - - S T R E E T
R
c a l �� Store and apartment building
13a ��
r 6 I� LJ-'' 20,0010 Gallon ;
No. 6 Fuel Oil
80RE(Typical) U/G Tank
Dunkin Donuts Building
•4 •3
80 (2) 275 Gal. No. 2 s
Fuel Oil A/G Tanks Residence
•} Property Line 10 000 Gal. No.6 Fuel Oil
Y i
(T pical) Tank-Abandoned T +
Auto body shop QQ 6,000 Gal. U/G , Residence
1 � Solvent Tan ,
7 Bldg.
' I 4 j
(3) 275 Gallon A/G Tanks- �'� ..,,•2
G Q 0 �� ..-
D y U ' r -
E
S T R E E T -
Property at = 80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MA Scale I"= 401 S I T E PLAN
FIGURE 2
Pt INC. ,
TANK LEGEND -
_ 1-3 Wastewater Sludge-A/G IO Raw Wastewater Pit- In Floor
4,5 Ton(chrome) Pits- in Floor II Raw Wastewater Pit - in Floor
6,7 Alum and Caustic -A/G 12 Chrome-A/G
8 Solvent Stili 13 Brine-A/G
WJ 9 Wastewater Clarifier 14 Grease Storage-A/G
_ TRE E T ��--'" -
Q / 05 Store and apartment building
6 iM L 20,000 Galion
-r No. 6 Fuel Oil
BORE(Typical) U/G Tank
Tan Pits '
Dunkin Donuts Tan Pits Building
• 4 •3 ❑ ❑ _
/oo ,
13 8a g a (2) 275 Gal. No. 2
+ 70 '
E
Property Line 000 Fuel Oil A/G Tanks Residence
(Typical) r-- ` IQnk- Gal. No. 6Abandoned Fuel Oil ?— /
� fO \ Tonk-Abandoned �
Auto body shop 6,000 Got. U/G �t ' Residence
Q Solvent Tank 7 ( ! f4
Bldg.
(3) 275 Galion A/G Tanks "/ 24�
G Color Pit -
J, `
f /
( 1
jj
To Sewer S T R E E T To Sewer
Property at , 60 BOSTON STREET
SALEM,MA Scale: I"= 40' SITE PLAN
FIGURE 28
S P, I i`:C.
• analysis of reactivity , corrosivity, ignitability and extraction
procedure toxicity. The hazardous material investigations
required tests for eight heavy metals in the soil and volatile
organics (VOA) , pH and conductivity in-groundwater.
Since many sites have been developed only to discover that
wastes stored below the ground continue to leach heavy metals or
carcinogenic solvent fumes that affect human health , the
importance of complete site studies is a financial necessity.
Many construction techniques and treatment programs can
eliminate the risk in industrial site development , but the
problems have to be discovered by chemical analysis .
Documentation of the size, character and constituents of any
previous landfill activity is essential to the determination of
• future impacts . The combination of test cores ; soil
characterization, soil EP toxicity tests, and surface and
groundwater chemical analysis (if groundwater is encountered)
reveals the extent of site contamination, if any. The enclosed
discussion and engineering report presents the results of
previous industrial activity on the site and how it relates to
future development potential.
All applicable sites must be certified free of hazardous
wastes and contaminated groundwater in order to obtain titl-e
insurance for - the sale , remortgages or building addition to the
property . This site survey is conducted by an engineer who has
had extensive experience handling the hazardous materials from
• tanneries , electroplaters , and other industries as well as the
design of wastewater treatment systems , sludge disposal
facilities and landfills. This experience includes a variety of
remedial site clean-up actions.
All soils and groundwater are sampled according to EPA
protocol and analyzed at SP, Inc. ' s in-house chemistry
laboratory in Salem, Massachusetts. All sites are subjected to
corings and grounds survey to determine natural conditions and
any areas of man-made fill or disposal.
A material is considered hazardous if it shows :
1. Ignitability - Having a flashpoint of less than 1400F;
a nonliquid liable to cause fires through friction , absorption
of moisture, spontaneous chemical change or retained heat from
manufacturing or liable when ignited to burn so vigorously and
persistently as to create a hazard ; ignitable compressed gases ;
oxidizers.
2. Corrosivity - Aqueous wastes exhibiting a pH of less
than or equal to 2 or greater than or equal to 12. 5 and liquid
wastes capable of corroding steel at a rate of greater than 0. 25
inches per year.
3 . Reactivity - Readily undergo violent chemical change ;
react violently or form potentially explosive mixtures with
water ; generate toxic fumes when mixed with water (or when
exposed to mild acidic or basic conditions for sulfide or
cyanide bearing wastes) , explode when subjected to a strong
initiating force ; explode at normal temperatures and pressures ;
or classified as Class A or B explosives .
4. Fail the EP Toxicity Tests - The Extraction Procedure
(EP) Toxicity Test is designed to simulate the physical
3
p•rocsssPs.. wh cl+ a� +,].�] o-cur in a landfill. To simulate the
• acidic .le.aching medium` 'which occur in actively decomposing
landfills ,•' EPA chose* to employ acetic acid. To simulate the
leaching process , EPA specified a `procedure requiring the mixing
of the solid 'component of thewastes (soil in this instance)
with the acidic leaching medium for a period of 24 hours . To
d,upli.cate :the"attenuation in 'concentration expected to occur
between ,,the. point of leachate generation and the point of human
or enyironmentai�exposure , EPA applied a dilution factor of 100
to the concentration of toxic constituents observed in the test
extxac.t
5 . Identified--as _a Priority Pollutant - The RCRA
legislation. has 'class Pied a minimum of 126 organic and metallic
• compounds as acutely hazardous to human health. As such , only -�
extremely low levels are tolerated in the environment and =`
non-existence,..r=, 11ir:=f; For drinking water sources . These
compounds are detecte`d• by gas chromatograph and regulated
.according ta, their leve-, mode of toxicity (i .e. oral , dermal ,
inhalation.)_ and health 'effect (carcinogen, irritant , or
mutagen, ) ,. In all,.cases , there are chronic (long-term) concerns
.as wel'1 `as 'acute (single=exposure) toxicities that have to be
evaluated .
S-
A six-•inch diameter auger coring device was used to
Tenetra'te aspi, t .or. Soii to refusal or several feet below the
• groundwater. table . Anengineer on site during excavation
4
:a.
• characterized soil strata type, depth, unnatural material
quantities and groundwater levels . This data is presented in
the Soil Logs (Figures 3 , 4, 5 & 6) . Any organic material,
colored soil or landfill refuse is sampled as a worst case and
subjected to the EP Toxicity Test . All analyses are `performed
according to Standard Methods 15th edition 1980 , RCRA
Regulations E.P. Toxicity Extraction Procedures 1978 , or the EPA
Method 602 for gas chromatographic analysis of petroleum
hydrocarbons . Quality assurance and sample identification
protocols are in accordance with federal requirements of the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) , and
Clean Water Act of 1976.
. IV. Surface and Subsurface Geology
The site is located within the Salem Quadrangle of the USGS
Topographic Map Series . The topography of the site is mostly
sloping to the southeast according to the Quadrangle Map with an
average elevation of 35 feet above sea level . Run-off flows in
two major directions . The front side of the property abutting
Boston Street , run-off is to the southeast down Boston Street .
On the back side of the property, run-off is to the northeast
were the North River presently exists . The area being
investigated is approximately 1. 67 acres . One large
conglomerate three-story brick building occupies approximately
60 percent of the site with the remaining 40 percent covered by
• concrete and asphalt . The asphalt/concrete areas are subdivided
into three sections ; two of the areas are on the northwest and
5
• southeast ends of the property abutting Boston Street with the
remaining concrete area abutting Goodhue Street to the
northeast. Surrounding the property is commercial/industrial to
the northeast and southeast , residential to the northwest and
southwest.
The subsurface soils are believed to be all fill ranging
from sand and gravel to rock . The soil. is part of the Urban
Land-Udorthenis Association where soils have been altered or
obscured by Urban works and structures or where soil material
has been excavated and redeposited. An unknown quantity of
brick and concrete footing slabs are present in the subsurface
due to the remains of an old structure which burned many years
ago. Subsurface soils were encountered in all asphalt/concrete_
• areas . Priority areas for drilling were near underground
petroleum tanks.
On the northwest end of the property , within the parking
area and abutting Boston Street , contamination of #6 oil was
encountered in Test Hole #1 and #6. Test Hole #1 was highly
contaminated with #6 oil , free flowing at approximately 13. 5
feet. SP, Inc . drilled to a depth of 20 feet before abandoning
Test Hole #1. It is likely that contamination continues to a
depth greater than 20 feet in Test Hole #1. Test Hole #6 was
explored to determine if any #6 oil had migrated downgradient
from a 20 , 000-gallon underground #6 oil tank. Contamination was
encountered at 11 feet in Test Hole 176 . Drilling was stopped
• due to the lack of day-light. The extent of contamination is
assumed to be widespread because of the porous nature of the
fill material.
Also abutting Boston Street and to the southeast behind
Dunkin Donuts , SP, Inc. drilled Test Holes #3 and #4 within the
asphalt areas. Both Test Holes had well sorted brown medium
sand fill. Subsurface soils in this area appeared free of any
contamination during testing .
However , Test Hole #2 , drilled to the east next to Goodhue
Street , was contaminated with solvents from the 6, 000-gallon
underground solvent tank upgradient from the Test Hole . Further
upgradient from Test Hole #2, SP, Inc. drilled two additional
Test Holes , #7 and #8, on Novembe_ 30, 1988 . This area was
investigated further due to the solvent detected downgradient
from Test Hole #2. Test Hole #7 and #8 did posses detectable
volatiles possibly from the solvent tank. The HNU readings in
the back lot ranged from 20 to 120 ppm. Due to the
multi-contaminated areas on site, the augering equipment was
steam cleaned after each encounter with contamination.
Groundwater was encountered in Test Hole #2, which was the
closest boring to the North River at approximately 8 feet.
Groundwater did possess quantities of volatiles believed to be
solvent from the suspected leaky underground tanks . The type of
solvent used as a degreaser in sheepskin leather manufacturing
is called Stoddard' s solvent. It is a complex mixture of
straight and branched chain paraffins , naphthenes and aromatic
hydrocarbons . A petroleum distillate, it is also called mineral
spirits and has a kerosene odor . It is insoluble in water
M (specific gravity 0. 79) and boils between 1540G and 2020G (not
very volatile) (see attached fact sheet in the Appendix) .
7
V. Tank Information
Information concerning any petroleum storage containers
on-site was acquired from multiple interviews with employees and
a visit to -the Salem Fire Department. According - to John Keenan,
Manager and 31-year employee of John Flynn & Sons , the following
tanks exist on-site.
1 . (1) 20 , 000-gallon $6 fuel oil underground tank located
in the northwest parking lot abutting Boston Street .
2. (2) 275-gallon $2 fuel oil aboveground tanks located
within the shiping room on the northwest corner of the building.
3 . (3 ) 275-gallon $2 fuel oil aboveground tanks located
within the maintenance shop abutting Goodhue Street to the east .
4. (1) 6 , 000-gallon solvent underground tank located
between the maintenance shop and the boiler room within the
driveway area.
5. (1) 10, 000-gallon abandoned #6 fuel oil underground tank
located in the boiler room abutting Goodhue Street.
6. Other tanks on site , non-petroleum , involved in effluent
treatment , are mixing tanks , clarifier , sludge storage , solvent
recovery, caustic soda, alum and polymer . These tanks are above
ground fiberglass or steel vessels that will be sold off as part
of a treatment system.
7 . Various steel and fiberglass above ground tanks exist
throughout the factory for the storage of process chemicals .
These include vessels for salt brine , formic acid , trivalent
• chromium (15% solution) and fat liquors . While these are not
hazardous wastes , the chemicals would still have to be returned
to the seller and the tanks cleaned before being sold .
8 . Wastewater from the tan and color processes are
collected in four below floor concrete pits. These pits and
associated trenches generally contain accumulations of sludge
that have low levels of chromium, phenolics and solvents . While
these are not hazardous wastes , they still require cleaning,
dewatering and disposal in a "special" landfill.
VI. Site Use & History
The site, for the past 68 years , has been utilized ,
according to an interview with 31 year employee John Keenan and
a Deed Search at the Salem Registry of Deeds , for the
manufacture of leather from pickled sheepskin stock . John Flynn
and Sons , at one time , was a world leader in processing
• sheepskins into finished garment leather . The manufacturing
activities require many chemical baths to prepare the skins and
color the leather . This facility did not remove the hair from
the skins , but utilized dehaired acid-pickled raw stock from New
Zealand.
According to the Deed Search , the buildings and land were
purchased from 1926 to 1950. The following section shows the
number of purchases made to acquire the existing property.
November 2 , 1928, M-r- . Flynn purchased the three-story
structure from Bernard J. Mulligan, where the business
originally began. In addition to this , Mr . Flynn purchased the
additional buildings and land from Joseph Polansky in 1935 ,
Charles Kokoras in March of 1936 , Lena Mahoney in September
1936 , William C. Norton in July 1947 , Joseph Polansky in May
1948 and finally Charles Kokoras in August 1950.
During this time period and up to the present , John Flynn &
Sons has generated several distinct wastewater operations
associated with leather processing . Included in these processes
were solvent degrease, tan, blue soak , retanning; faf liquoring ,
coloring and finishing . Chemical analyses have been conducted
regularly to characterize daily wastewater , sludge and process
wastes . Treatment system operation has allowed compliance with
Local and Federal effluent discharge limits since 1980.
The wastewater is prescreened, chemically coagulated and
settled in a primary clarifier. End products from processing
such as grease and chrome trimmings are either recycled or sold
to other industries . The final effluent is discharged to the
SESD Municipal Sewer System for further wastewater treatment
• before discharge into Salem Harbor. Primary sludge is dewatered
by a filter press and disposed of in a special landfill.
Also stored in the building are a large number of 55-gallon
drums and paper barrels (10 to 20) that contain outdated
chemicals , finish mixes , fly ash , still bottoms and unknowns .
Some of these materials are being returned to the sellers and
others are not hazardous . A full barrel inventory is being
prepared to identify the waste streams , label the barrels and
schedule disposal by a licensed hazardous waste firm.
The facility is presently being considered for resale . The
facility is presently under-going a clean-up operation .
Clean-up includes selling all pretreatment materials and
machinery. While on-site , SP, Inc. observed clean-up
• operations . The tannery still needs more maintenance , including
10
floor cleaning of chemical spills and sludge clean-up in
trenches and pits throughout the basement of the building . SP,
Inc. would request a site revisit when Flynn & Sons have
finished the clean-up of the facility to determine if any
hazardous waste remains on-site.
VIZ. Areas of Concern
There are multiple areas of hazardous waste contamination
which were visually observed in the subsurface soils during SP,
Inc. ` s site investigation .
1. Test Holes #1 and #6 , within the parking area , located
on the northwest end of the site , was highly contaminated with
#6 fuel oil. Apparently the 20, 000-gallon #6 fuel oil tank is
• leak'r.; . The steel tank is 38 _Years old according to the Salem
Fire Department. SP, Inc. drilled to a depth of 20 feet and
discovered #6 fuel oil at approximately 13 to 20 feet. The oil
flowed freely into the boring up to 1.5 feet. HNU readings
ranged from 16 to 70 ppm' s. Test Hole # 6 was explored
downgradient from the 20 , 000-gallon #6 fuel oil tank to
determine potential migration of the fuel oil. Soil
contaminated with fuel oil was discovered at 11 feet. The
source of contamination within Test Hole #6 is believed to be
from migrated ' #6 fuel oil that originated in the upgradient
20 , 000-gallon in-ground tank. The porous nature of the sand and
gravel found in this area would indicate that the extent of
contamination is widespread . The fill material from grade to 11
• feet down, did not appear contaminated . The steep grade on the
11
north side of this parking lot did not show any evidence of
seepage or oil migration.
2 . Abutting Goodhue Street and between the maintenance shop
and the boiler room, Test Hole #2 produced high volatile
_ organics . Discovered at approximately 7 feet was possible
solvent contamination from the upgradient 6 , 000-gallon in-ground
solvent tank . HNU readings with headspace analysis techniques
measured 180 ppm' s . The Stoddard ' s solvent (mineral spirits)
believed to be present in the soil is insoluble in water and
does not evaporate readily. As mentioned previously, almost the
entire site is paved or covered with concrete. A tidal canal,
the North River , exists downgradient approximately 200 yards
from the site. There is a potential risk that the solvent
• material may migrate to the river . The river is , however , a
Class D waterbody with no recreational or shellfishing
activities . There are no wells downgradient of the property and
no mechanism by which the solvent could become surface run-off.
3 . Beneath the boiler room there is a 10 , 000-gallon
abandoned #6 fuel oil in-ground tank . This tank , was believed
to be leaking when it ' s use was discontinued in 1973. The tank
was installed in 1939 . SP, Inc. was unable to test the soils
around the tank because they are under a building . Even" the
adjacent loading dock is covered by a thick concrete pad .
The oil , if present , is well contained and does not pose
any immediate risk to human health . If the buildings were
demolished and new foundations were excavated , then the oil and
• soil would have to be removed and properly contained in a secure
landfill.
4. The presence of waste barrels (10 to 20) in the building
necessitates further inventory, identification and labeling .
John Flynn and Sons has followed the RCRA regulations in the
regular disposal and -manifesting of routinely produced hazardous
waste -streams that consist of still bottoms , boiler ash, finish
mixes and spent laquers . Many of the barrels remaining are not
listed hazardous wastes (RCRA 45 CFR Section 261. 31) , but '
process chemicals that may or may not be usable. Because of
certain constituents , they will have to be incinerated or
disposed of in a secure landfill.
Overall, these concerns have not interferred with the
present industrial use of the property. Occupational exposure
to the subsurface soils is negligible ; therefore , there has not
• been, nor is there an imminent threat of any deleterious impact
on human health and safety. The industrial nature of the entire
area and present condition of the North River also indicates
that there is minimal potential for environmental harm.
Effective containment of these contaminated soils could allow
continued industrial use of the property. Any construction or
excavation would require soil removal.
VIII. Soil and Water Analysis Summary
Soil sampling was conducted with a hollow stem continuous
flight auger with a split-spoon sampling device for each Test
Hole. Samples were taken every foot as material was brought to
the surface with the auger flights . Each sample was analyzed
• for strata and lithology changes . While on site , samples were
13
then composited into one approved DEQE container per Test Hole
for further chemical analyses . During- drilling, the soil
samples did possess obvious volatile qualities, excluding Test
Holes #4 and #5 which had no hydrocarbon volatiles. The
drilling continued until refusal (ledge - or boulders) was reached
or 5 feet below groundwater.
F
A multi-triangular boring configuration and the previously
obtained subsurface information aided in the determination of
test holes relative to the site. Each test hole composite was
subjected to Extraction Procedure Toxicity testing (EP Tax) .
Three EP Tax samples were tested. Soil samples from Test Hole
#1 were tested as one unit. Soil samples from Test Hole #2 and
#3 were composited together as the second unit, and -soil samples
from Test Hole #5 and #6 as the third EP Tox unit . All EP Tox
results were free of any hazardous heavy metals.
The amount of oil in the soil in the upper parking lot
ranged from 8. 08 worst case Hole #1, 6. 38 composite Hole #1 and
1. 338 worst case Hole #6. Hole #6 is 25 feet downgradient of
the oil tank and is believed to represent (within 10 feet) the
extent of oil migration. This is important because with
industrial sites up to 1. 08 oil is not considered hazardous and
can remain on-site.
Soil contaminated with #6 fuel oil from Test Hole #1 was
tested for Organochlorine Pesticides and PCB ' s . All results
from these tests were non-detectable . A VOA (volatile organic
analysis) was also conducted on the oil within Test Hole #1.
Detectable compounds were benzene at 12500 mgll and ethylbenzene
14
at 930 mg/l. Additional VOA were concentrated on Test Hole #2.
Soil samples had 254 ug/kg benzene , 119 ug/kg ethylbenzene , 57
ug/kg toluene and 85 ug/kg xylenes .
Groundwater was encountered in only Test Hole #2 (back 4
solvent tank area) . A VOA indicated 1870 ug/l benzene , 94 ug/kg
ethylbenzene , 15 ug/kg toluene and 42 ug/l xylenes . Oil and
grease levels were 0. 128 , and not a problem in this area.
Two of the above contaminants have been recorded with the
Federal Register of Concerned Pollutants , Volume 45, No. 23.
The following is stated within this volume.
A. Benzene , Saltwater Aquatic Life :
The available data for Benzene indicates that acute
toxicitv to saltwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as
low as 5,100 ug/l and would occur at lower concentrations among
species that are more sensitive than those tested.
B . Toluene , Saltwater Aquatic Life:
The available data for Toluene indicates that acute and
chronic toxicity to saltwater aquatic life occurs at
concentrations as low as 6, 300 and 5, 000 ug/l , respectively , and
would occur at lower concentrations among species that are more
sensitive than those tested.
IX. DEQE Spill File Review
1. According to the DEQE Incident Files , at 2 Goodhue
Street, on the corner of Goodhue and Bridge , a release was
15
reported in April 1987, Case #3-0427 . The lot is utilized as a
® parking lot and owned by James Weener of JHW Corporation. The
source of contamination is believed to be from P. Claiman , who
has a 55 year old 10, 000-gallon concrete underground tank .
According to Jim Weener , the tank was pumped and cleaned this
summer . A site assessment was conducted by Target Environmental
Service in April 1987 showing high fuel oil, diesel or kerosene
in concentrations up to 21 ppm. The case is presently pending .
2. Located at 12 Hanson Street , and not recorded in DEQE
Incident Files, just northwest from John Flynn & Sons , SP, Inc.
conducted a site investigation for Beverly Leather Corporation
in March 1987. The site inve igation discovered high lead at
greater than 5 mg/1, oil andgrease at 17. 5 percent and total
• volatile organics of 3920 ug!l within Test Hole #2. The source
of contamination is believed to be the finishing air exhaust of
the past operation . Remedial action was conducted on April 22,
1988 by SP, Inc. SP, Inc. supervised the removal of 120 . 16 tons
of contaminated soil. The soil was transported by Total Waste
Management Corporation, Newington, New Hampshire (US EPA ID
#NHD980521843) to Sawyer Environmental Recovery of Hampden,
Maine .
X. Conclusions
It is evident that the property has been exposed to
discharges of hazardous materials. This being the case , we
cannot certify the property free of hazardous materials . The
• magnitude of release also means that DEQE will have to be
16
notified according to MGL Chapter 21E Two major areas on the
site should be subjected to remedial action , with an additional
area of probable #6 fuel oil contamination dealt with if the
building is demolished (see Site Plan) . Within the building ,
more areas of- concern exist such as ; sludge filled trenches , '
chemical spills on floors and the remaining barrel inventory.
It may be concluded that the hazardous constituents present in
the soils and groundwater (Test Hole #2) do not , at the present ,
pose a threat to human health or the environment. This is due
to the fact that no drinking water wells or natural resources
exist in the area.
However , subsurface environmental problems obviously exist.
Groundwater was found in only one Test Hole (#2) . This hole is
• believed to contain solvents from the upgradient in-ground tank .
These solvents could be migrating to the North River. The two
46 fuel oil releases should be contained (non-migrating) due to
the high viscosity of the petroleum product. The sources of #6
fuel oil contamination are suspected to be from the in-ground
tanks .
The in-ground 20 , 000-gallon tank , 46 fuel oil , on the
northwest corner of the site , was installed and inspected on
July 8 , 1950 . The abandoned 10 , 000-gallon tank , #6 fuel oil,
beneath the boiler room, was installed and inspected on December
1 , 1939 . The 20, 000-gallon tank is still in use to heat the
major portion of the building .
Although the contaminate levels are in excess of the limits
• set by DEQE, it is still unclear on how to treat this site ' s
17
specific problem. According to DEQE, any soil contaminated with
virgin petroleum products reading greater than 10 ppm's of
volatiles with the HNU meter, should be removed. It must be
emphasized that this is not a fixed standard and " DEQE may allow
site specific alternative remedial goals whenever it is deemed.
appropriate.
,
At this point, SP, Inc. would recommend soil and tank
removal and an effective in-situ treatment such as recovery
wells to treat the solvent area groundwater. To confirm our
recommendations, we must submit this report to DEQE with a waste
contingency plan for further approval.
The occupational exposure limits (OSHA) for benzene in air
is 10 ppm. Levels of 50 to 70 ppm were encountered -in the test
cores , but were not evident at the surface of the property.
Excavation would be the only mechanism by which workers would be
exposed to the threshold levels. Removal and stockpiling of the
soil would be conducted under the supervision of an engineer and
safety precautions such as organic vapor masks (for workers in
the excavation) and plastic covering of material would be
followed. As described in the Soil Logs , the layer of
contaminated material is covered by 7 to 11 feet of clean fill.
This also minimizes -the risk of direct human contact .
Although there is no current danger of migration or further
exposure , the contaminated soil must be removed and properly
disposed of in a licensed landfill. This is a common procedure
that can be accomplished safely over a period of several months .
Portable volatile meters can identify the contaminated material
18
during excavation for isolation on plastic. The stockpiled soil
will also be completely covered with plastic. Composite soil
samples will be taken after excavation is complete for
laboratory analyses that are required for landfill acceptance .
_Once acceptance is received (2 to 4 .weeks) , the material would
be loaded onto licensed trucks and hauled away.
The too 7 to 11 feet of clean fill will be removed to the
side and returned to the hole after the contaminated soil is
excavated. Soil samples of the bottom and sides remaining in
the excavation will be taken to confirm that all contaminated
material was removed . DEQE and other parties will receive all
chemical analyses , manifests and a final report documenting the
f
remedial action.
. The quantity of oily material to be removed from the
parking lot is estimated at 1100 cubic yards (60 ' x 60 ' x 8 '
average thickness , to below groundwater) . This would represent
an expenditure of $170 , 500 . 00 at $155/ton, if the material had
to be taken to the Sawyer Environmental facility in Maine.
However , chemical tests do not indicate any solvent or heavy
metal contamination, so the material could be taken to Brock ' s
Asphalt Plant in Dracut , Massachusetts at $90/ton for
$100 , 000 . 00 total . _
The solvent contaminated soil in the back of the building
will also have to be removed or encapsulated . The soil from the
groundwater to beneath the pavement contains varying amounts of
solvent . The average soil depth is 5 to 8 feet before refusal
• (ledge) . The estimated quantity of soil (roughly 100 ' x 30 ' x
19
• 6 ' ) is 700 cubic yards. Large material (rock and concrete) can
remain on-site if not saturated with solvent. Solvent disposal
requires transport to a secure landfill in New York or South
Carolina. The cost is approximately $225/ton or- $160, 000. 00 if
all ,materi`al has to go. Since the- site is not being considered
for residential construction, some low level material could
remain on-site if sealed to prevent future migration to the'
North River.
The barrels on-site , after characterization, can be
disposed of at a rate of $200 to $350 per drum, depending upon
the materials. It is not anticipated that removal would cost
more than $7, 000 . 00 for 20 barrels .
After soil removal and backfill in the solvent ._area , we
would recommend the installation of two (4" ) groundwater
recovery wells . The groundwater would be pumped to granular
activated carbon filters for removal of the remaining soluble
petroleum compounds. Groundwater , after carbon absorption ,
should contain less than 5 ug/l of benzene and would be returned
to the ground on the property upgradient of the wells . This
continuous process will clean the groundwater and flush
remaining material from the soils over a period of 3 to 9
months . Monthly analyses of the wells will document the
remediation. 'The installation and operation of this equipment
(and final carbon disposal) is estimated to cost $16, 000 . 00 to
$18 , 000 . 00 .
The large 20 , 000-gallon fuel oil tank and 6 , 000-ca_lcn
• solvent tank need to be removed , cut open , wiped clean and
20
transported for disposal as scrap steel. This operation will
allow access to surrounding soil. It is estimated to cost
$20 , 000. 00 to complete the tank removal job. Excavation of
contaminated soils , with engineering supervision -and chemical
analysis-would cost approximately $20 , 000 to $30 , 000. The total
backfill material (1800 cy @ $8/cy) and resurfacing of the
excavated areas would cost an estimated $20 , 000 to $25, 000. r The
remediation proposed (all items) would cost an estimated
$360 , 000 . 00 (worst case) , depending on subsurface conditions
encountered. Outlined below are the conventional techniques and
costs used for this type of contamination.
ESTIMATED REMEDIAL COSTS , WORST CASE
A. 46 fuel oil soil contamination
front parking lot
disposal of 1100 cubic yards @ $90/ton
Brock ' s Asphalt Plant $100, 000.00
B. Solvent contaminated soil
disposal of 700 cy @ $225/ton
Model City, New York $160 , 000 . 00
C. Barrel removal 20 @ $350/barrel $ 7, 000.00
D. Solvent area, groundwater recovery
wells (2) , and monthly monitoring (9 man. ) $ 18, 000.00
E. Tank removal, cleaning and disposal
one 20 , 000-gallon #6
one 6 , 000-gallon solvent $ 20 , 000 . 00
F. Soil excavation, engineering supervision
and chemical analyses . DEQE permit MCP and
final report $ 30,000.00
G. Clean backfilling material 1800 cy @ $8/cy
. in-place, compacted and resurfaced with
asphalt $ 25 , 000 . 00
Total $360 , 000.00
21
There are other methodologies that can be used to remediate
• an industrial site such as this. Some. of them will save money ,
but would result in a site condition that would -be unsuitable
for residential housing. At this time, the property is being
marketed for commerc-ial use or warehouse activity_. The zoning
is also industrial/commercial and not likely to change in the
near future since there are many industries nearby. It is
anticipated that the old section of the building would be
demolished and a new structure built in its place , without a lot
of new foundation work.
These considerations mean that the $6 fuel oil contaminated
soil at a level of 1% or less can remain in the ground. The
section would be sealed in clay on the south and east side to
• contain any material from migrating as a liquid. The surface of
the excavation should be sealed with asphalt to minimize the
amount of rainwater that penetrates into the soils .
The solvent contaminated area on the back of the property
would also be sealed from downgradient Goodhue Street and the
North River by a clay layer . Groundwater encountered in this
area (Test Well $2) is not true groundwater , but interstitial
rainwater traveling on the subsurface ledge. When excavation
and tank removal are in process , a portable volatile compound
HNU meter will be used to determine which soils are above the 10
ppm limit . In many cases , the action of excavation aerates the
soils and releases volatiles causing marginal values of 15 to 20
• ppm to decrease and pass the criteria.
22
This soil, after aeration and large concrete or rock
pieces , can be returned (after DEQE review of the analyses) to
the hole as backfill. If the surface of the excavation is then
sealed by concrete or asphalt`, and by clay around the
downgradient perimeter , pump-out wells may not be required. The
quantity of material for disposal will also be reduced by 30 to
35 percent. If these techniques are allowed by DEQE, and they
have been used locally before , the following outline of costs
would apply .
ESTIMATED REMEDIAL COSTS FOR
COMMERCIAL SITE ENCAPSULATION
A. #6 fuel oil soil contamination
• front parking lot " .
disposal of 1100 cy @ $90/ton $100 , 000 . 00 - "-
B . Solvent contaminated soil after
aeration disposal of 350 cy @ $225/ton $ 80, 000 . 00
C . Barrel removal 20 @ $350 $ 7, 000. 00
D. No groundwater recovery wells NC
E. Tank removal, cleaning and disposal
20 , 000 and 6, 000 gallon tanks $ 20, 000 . 00
F . Soil excavation, engineering supervision
and chemical analyses . DEQE permits MCP
and final report $ 30, 000. 00
G. Clean backfill material 1200 cy @ $8/cy in _
place compacted and resurfaced with asphalt.
Clay layer around perimeter , both areas
160 cy @ $12/yd in-place $ 25 , 000.00
Total $262 , 000 . 00
23
LV VMI IVI♦ '
DEPTH
( Feet) BORE I _ BORE 2 -
0 Bituminous Concrete Bit. Conc.
Block loamy soil Black loamy fill with lots of bricks
and leather straps
Brown,loamy,medium sand with 5%
2 coarse gravel increasing to 25%
gravel
Greenish,moist, brown,medium-fine.
sand fill with 10% coarse gravel with
brick and wood chunks
4
Very coarse gravel to cobbles
1
6 Greenish brown fine sand with 10%
gravel.Solvent detected at 7 , HNu
headspace=180 ppm.
8 Brown, well sorted, coarse sand to Water
fine gravel moderately stained with Greenish, well sorted,medium sand
No. 6 fuel oil
Bottom of Hole
10 HNu= 70 ppm at 10`
12
OIL
Heavily stained.
14 1
Free flow of No. 6 fuel oil at 15.
HNu= 16ppm
16 20' HNu = 32 ppm
Bottom of Hole
SOIL LOGS
• Property at: 80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM,MA
FIGURE 3
S P, INC.
�.vvnt tvtr
DEPTH
( Feet) BORE 3 _ BORE 4
0 Concrete YeIlow, well sorted,medium sand
Brown medium sand
with 10% coarse Fill
grovel fill
2 Dark brown sandy loom with 10%
coarse gravel fill
f
4 Refusal - Concrete
HNu =0.0 ppm
6
8
• _ I
i
10
12
14 -
1
Bottom of Hole
HNu =0.0ppm
16
SOIL LOGS
Property at : 80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MA
FIGURE 4
SP INC.
DEPTH t�V 1i#4 1 1V14
( Feet) BORE 5 _ BORE 6 -
0 Brown mediumsond with 25% Sit. Concrete
coarse gravel.Fi If Black-coarsesandy
loom with brick and 25%
fine
2
Brown medium sand with 25%
fine-coarse grovel
4
Fine sand,well sorted
Refusal,
HNu =0.0 ppm
8
10
Contaminated with No. 6 fuel oil at
11' HNu headspace = 45ppm
12
Bottom of Hole
14
16
SOIL LOGS
RrotPuty at : 60 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MA
FIGURE 5
SP INr
DEPTH LOCATION
( Feet ) BORE 7 — BORE 8
0
Concrete Concrete
Coarse-medium,moist,block sand Fine,dark brown,well sorted sand
with brick
2
Coarse-medium,wet,block sand
4
6 Refusal
HNu 1'-4' Composite =120 ppm
8
10 Bottom of Hole
HNu I'-4' Composite = 32 ppm
HNu 4'- 9' Composite = 20ppm
12
14
SOIL LOGS
Property at. 80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM, MA
FIGURE 6
SP,1NC.
DATE: 11/30/88
John Flynn & Sons
80 Boston St. PROJ. NO.=
Salem, MA 01970
Chanter LE Site ASsessmentLABORATORY REPORT
pH %Total EP Bulk Oil PCB VOA Comment
Solids Tox Metals &
Grease
1 1 * * 3 2-
811079 X 94 .7% 6 . 30% X Bore 1 0-201 soil
080 X 95 . 4% X X 8 .07% X X Bore 1 Worst Case Soil
081 X X X X X Oil in hole 41
082 7 . 42 88 .8% X 0 . 95% X Soil Bore 2
083 X X X X X X X Watez Bore 2
085 X X X X X X Water Bore 2
084 X 85 . 9% X X 0 . 12% X X Worst Case Bore 2 Soil
086 8 . 68 96 . 6% 1 X 0 . 27% X X Soil Bore 3
087 X X X Soil Bore 4
088 7 . 96 94 . 0% X X 0 . 11% X X Soil Bore 5
089 X 95 . 2% X X 0 . 72% X X Soil Bore 6
090 X 95 . 0% X X 1 . 33% X X worst Case Soil Bore 6
* Bulk metals & oil & grease based on dry-weight
1 See EP Tox Analysis Sheet Attached
2 See Volatile Organic Analysis Sheet Attached
3 See PCB Analysis Sheet Attached
S m Mitchell
Samoled on : 11/7/88
Sample Rc 'd : 11/7/88
Sam" le Info •
ii oc.
DATE y LABORATORY O1REC
John Flynn & Sons DATE: 11/30/88
80 Boston St. PROJ. NO.
Salem, MA 01970
EP Tox Soil Analysis LABORATORY REPORT
Bore 1Bore 2 Comp. Bore 3-4 EP Tox
811079 811082 811086-7 Limits
H units X 7. 42 8 . 68
%Total Solids 94 . 7% 88 . 88 96 . 6%
EP Tox Extraction
Arsenic m /l <0 . 001 <0. 001 <0 . 001 5 . 0
Barium m /l <0 . 2 <0. 2 <0 . 2 100 . 0
Cadmium mcg/l <0 . 01 <0 .01 <0 . 01 1 .0
Chromium m /l <0 .02 0 .10 <0 .02 5 . 0
Lead m /l <0 . 03 1. 55 1.16 5 . 0
mercury m /l <0. 001 <0. 001 <0. 001 0. 2
Selenium m /l <0 . 001 <0. 001 <0 . 001 1. 0
Silver m l 0 . 03 <0. 01 <0 . 01 5. 0
Bulk Metals*
Cadmium mg/kg <0 . 1 X X
Chromium ma/kma/ko 3 . 91 X X
Lead mg/kq mg/k4 . 14 X X
*
Bulk Metals based on dry-weight
Sampled by: William Mitchell
Srmoled on : 11/7/88
Sample Rc 'd : 11/7/88
Sample Info :
DATE LABORATORY DIRECT
a
SP, INC.
29 Congress Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Client : John Flynn & Sons
Sample Received: 11/7/88
Sample Analyzed: 11/22/88
Sampled by : William Mitchell _
EPA 601 & 602 Volatile Organics
Front Parking Lot
Parameter Oil in Hole #1
811081 mg/1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Benzene 12500
Bromodichloromethane ND
Bromoform ND
Bromomethane ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chlorobenzene ND
Chloroethane ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND
Chloroform ND
Chloromethane - ND '
Dibrcmochloromethane ND.
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene ND
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND
1 , 1-Dichloroethane ND
1 , 2-Dichloroethane ND
41-Dichloroethene ND
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene ND
1 , 2-Dichloropropaae ND
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ND
trans-13-Dichloropropeje ND
Ethylbenzene 930
Methylene chloride ND
1, 1 , 2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
Tetrachloroethene ND
Toluene ND
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ND
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane ND
Trichloroethene ND
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride ND
Total Xylenes ND
n9 Dil -
Date Lab D' ecto
ND— Non detectable
Method Detection Limit = 500 mg/1
SP , INC.
29 Congress Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Client: John Flynn & Sons
Sample Received : 11/7/88 _
Sample Analyzed : - 11/28/88
Sampled by : William Mitchell
EPA 601 & 602 Volatile Organics
Solvent Area
Groundwater
Bore 2
Parameter 811085 ug/1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Benzene 187
Bromodichloromethane ND
Bromoform ND
Bromomethane ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chlorobenzene ND
Chloroethane ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND
Chloroform ND
Chloromethane ND -
Dibromochloromethane - ND
1 , 2-01chlorobenzene ND
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND
1 , 1-Di-chloroethane ND
1 ,3-0- ichloroethane ND
1 , 1-Dichloroethene ND
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene ND
1 , 2-Dichloropropane ND
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ND
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ND
Ethylbenzene 94
tfethvlene chloride ND
1 , 1 , 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ND
Tetrachloroethene ND
Toluene 15
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ND
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane ND
Trichloroethene ND
Tric`.ilorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride ND
Total Xylenes 42
Date ~ A, j Lab Di ector
ND = Non detectable
Method Detection Limit = 10 ug/1
SP, INC.
29 Congress Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Client : John Flynn & Sons
Sample Received : 11/7/88
Sample Analyzed : -11/28/88
Sampled by : William Mitbhell - y
EPA 601 & 602 Volatile Organics
Solvent Area
Soil (ug/kg)
Parameter Bore 2
__--
811082
Benzene 254
Bromodichloromethane ND
Bromoform ND
Bromomethane ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chlorobenzene ND
Chloroethane ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND
Chloroform ND
Chloromethane_ ND
Dibromochloromethane - ND
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene ND
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND
1 , 1-Dichloroethane ND
1 , 2-Di-chloroethane ND
1 , 1-Dichloroethene ND
trans-1 , 2-Dichloroethene ND
1 , 2-Dichloropropane ND
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ND
trans-1 , 3-04-chloropropeae ND
Ethylbenzeae 119
Methylene chloride ND
1 , 1 , 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ND
Tetrachloroethene ND
Toluene 57
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ND
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane ND
Trichloroethene ND
Trichlorofluoromethane ND
Vinyl chloride ND
Total Xylenes
Date' Lab utr
ND = Non detectable
Method Detection Limit = 50 ug/kg
John Flynn & Sons
80 Boston St.
Salem, MA 01970
EPA 608 ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES AND PCSS
SAMPLE ID: 811079 , 081
Sample Date: 11/7/88 `
PARAMETER RESULTS
Soil Bore 1 Oil in Hole #1
811079 811081
Aldrin ND ND
A-BHC ND ND
E-6 HC ND ND
G-SHC ND ND
D-SHC ND ND
Chlordane NO ND
4.41 - DDD NO NO
4. 4-1 - DCr ND NO
4.4' - DDT ND ND
Dieldrin NO ND
Endc=_ulfan I ND ND
Endosulfan II NO ND
Endosulfan Sulfate ND NO
Endrin ND ND-
cndrin Aldehyde ND ND
He:,t=ch l0r ND ND
Heptachlcr Epcxi.�e ND ND
Tcxaphene ND ND
PZ:- 10 i6 ND ND
FC6- 1221 ND ND
PC2-12-2 ND ND
PCS-1242 ND ND
PCE-1248 ND ND
PCS- 1254 ND ND
=C5-129-0 ND NO
Oe'e_t i cn L i m i t = 1 ug/kg
NO = Ncn de eCtable
A
i/130 e
Dar Latcrat:rkDlrec��
APPENDIX
TANK r n/F0A M,a TitlN ON FLYN,v E Sp>vs AT =
80 f3057'oN S7,✓?E,ET S.1.GvE.wY MAS.+`ALh'USE7TS
,sAC.EM F/RE 1iEPAR7M"7-
//-�7-EIS
POWEn BCR\I;BS ro»» POWER BURNERS
Name John ri=n r, r..nc
- - Date Jul? 25,1979 -
Addtesa 80 a _on S`
Name John _- Sons
Datc
T i+. R Ins, ,
Location 60 Boston St No.of Tanks 2
Name of Burner Kind of Hest
?arndzr Lot 80 Easton Name of Burner Clever°roo'ss hIass.Approval No. - 789
Galt-Stored .^") Can.of Tank 2= ^�at
aa. ..
Gals.Stored 30.700 Kind.oC Heat Steam
Location of Tank Kiad of Oil
Ucation of Tank 7ncercroun.d Kind of Oil (r-5
Of '- Installed by 7,.. , v C.of C.0
iaapesied Appm"d 7-p-:O Inspected byl•Dansreau Date Approved 7-25-79
rm»'• Power Burners ro".a. POWER BURNERS
p!p
Date Januar,! 12,1982 j Date December 29,1977
Name Jc'= -1^- rC Son Inc. Name John rr n tr Sons
inn
90 gO,_cri St Na. of Tanks 2 Location 19 Gocdhue St No.of Tanks 3
•
Name of Burner S ?iT Mass. Aooro.al No. G°3 Name of Burner 17111iaascr. Mass.Approval No. 'Sc9 ,
Gats. Stored 6a7 Kind of Heat Ste= Gals.Stored 62r Kind of Heat r v
Location of Tank -'=na St°='a xa 4ccr:Kind of Oil �2 j Location of Tank Garsce on Goodhue Kind of Oil #2
i
Installed byjanal Ka-eras C.of C. Eo2_ Installed by Steohe- C 3'2nw• ile C.of C. d ii.Acn
inspected byDate Approved 31-37-82 Inspected by D.C.Sosnovsk: Date Approved 12-29-77
�._ ._ _. ___YV••r.n -D l'ir a�t:ara —'— ( ..
Name
,
Address EO B03tan St
Data --J
as
Name of Burvcr Kind of Hot
Gala.Stored J n j Cap.of Tank '„
Location of Tank 19 000ch-e >. Kind of Oil 6
/mlalied by t a ...fi+ 'Gsn G S^n :nc, 6 D::.!r: St.
STODDARD SOLVENT weekly for 50 weeks. The kidneys and lung were the most
seriously effected. When benzene in like manner was test-
Mineral Spirits; White Spirits ed, it gave no evidence of skin absorption(41 and the LC%
for benzene was found to be 1300 ppm. In comparison,
CsH_u other studies have indicated lethal concentrations for mice
LV, 100 ppm ( 525 mg/ma) to be 16,000 ppm for heptane O) 13,500 ppm for octane,(s)
and 3200 ppm (LCs 4 hours)(6) for nonane.
STEL, 200 ppm 1050 mg/m1) Millions of industrial and domestic workers have been
exposed to Stoddard soivent with minimal evidence of ser-
Stoddard solvent is a mixture of straight and branched ious health effects, apart from its defatting and 'irritating
chainparaffins, naphthenes (cycloparaffins) and aromatic action on the skin.
hydrocarbons. It is a colorless liquid with a kerosene-like Relatively few data are available on the actual concen-
odor. Using the chemical formula above, the molecular trations of vapor such exposures have involved, however.
weight would be 128.25. The reported specific gravity is Oberg, in a survey. of 30 dry cleaning plants in Detroit,
0.79, boliing range from 754 to 202'C and a flash point found an average exposure of 65 ppm, with a TWA of 35
greater than 700°F. Insoluble in water, Stoddard solvent is ppm, for Stoddard solvents with flash points of about
miscibie with benzene, absolute alcohol, ether, chioro- 105' F.471 The worst plant had an estimated average expo-
form, carbon tetrachloride and carbon disulfide. sure of 135 to 200 ppm.
It is used-as a diluent in paints, coatings and waxes; as Carpenter et al(2)suggested 200 ppm as a hygienic stan-
dry c!eanin,g agent; as a degreaser and cleaner in mechani- dard for man.
cal ;hops and as a herbicide. NIOSH,on the other hand, proposed a workplace envi-
Aspirtionti) of the liquid results in diffused chemical ronmental standard of 350 mg/ma,corresponding to about
irritation of the lungs resulting in edema, a few milliliters 60 ppm,,O) The NIOSH recommendation,on a mg'mr basis,
may be fatal in these incidents. is the same for all refined petroleum solvents,from petro-
Carpenter et al(2) found that inhalation of 8200 mg/m} leum ether to mineral spirits and Stoddard solvents, includ-
(1400 porn), substantially air saturation at 25'C, caused ing 140 Flash aliphatic solvent. The latter is not included in
death of 1 of 15 rats in 8 hours. Beagle dogs and cats had this discussion. NIOSH also proposed a 15 minute ceiling
spasms and died at this concentration. There were no sig- of 1800 mg/ms, or about 310 ppm.
nificant efrects in dogs that inhaled 330 ppm,190 loom and It is recommended that the current TLV of 100 ppm be
84 ppm,6 hours daily, 5 dayslweek for 13 weeks (65 expo- retained for Stoddard solvent, This limit was calculated
sure days). However, rats at 330 pom for 65 days showed from data on the toxicities of its major ingredients,and was
•'ight kidnev damage. The rats from 300 ppm group had an designed primarily to prevent the irritative and narcotic ef-
crease :n blood-urea-nitrogen after 65 days. This may be fects of the vapors. Subsequent data, although somewhat '
associated with masked tubular regeneration and dilation difficult to interpret, tend to confirm this value, in the
or the loops of Henle as noted above for this level. opinion of the Committee.The occurrence of questionable
In 15-minute inhalation period for people, slight eye it- kidney injury from exposures not greatly in excess or 100
ritation was reported in 1 of 6 at 150 ppm. ppm)') provides additional evidence of the desirability of a
Rector er alt3) exposed rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, lower TLV than that which existed prior to the adcption of
and mcoke;s $ hours/day, 5 days/week for 30 exposure the 100 ppm value.
days and also for%days continuously to vapors of mineral A STEL of NO ppm, somewhat lower than the ceiling
sp;nts used as a paint thinner by U.S. Navy. Their samples limit recommended by .NIOSH, is suggested.
met the Stoddard solvent specifications. In an 8-hour expo-
sure at 2w) ppm there was minor congestion and emphv-
sema in guinea pits lungs only. The rats did not show kid- References:
rey les;ong, .%hich was different than Carpenter's findings 1. Gerarde, H.W.: Aliphatic hydrocarbons, Industria Hvgiene &
for his ;--a:n of rats. None of the other test species showed Toxicology, 2nd ed., p. 1193, Interscience, NY (1%3),
any signs- of physiological dama e at 290 ppm. 2 Carpenter,C.P.et at, lox. Appt. Pharm.32:282-297
Because Stoddard solvent contains 6.3'6 or more C,o and 3. Rector, D.E. et al: lbid. 4257-268 (1%6).
higher molecular weight hydrocarbons_T proper recogni- 4. Nau,CA et at: Arch. £ny. Hearth pp. 332.393 i1<+,5).
tion or decane and its homolog's hazardous- nature should 5. Flury, F., Zemik, F.: Schadliche Case, pp. 257.264, I- Springer,
be taken. Berlin (1931).
Nau er a.'O) found n-decane had an LC; of 540 ppm for 6. Carpenter,C.P. of at Tex.Apcl. Pharm. 44:54(1973).
mace exposed for 3.75 hours. This level was borne for 13 7. 06erg hl.: Am. Ind, H)g. .i,sec. 1. 293+" (14:31.
hours:day. 7 dayslweek by rats iShcut. significant effects g- NIOSH: G-re^ia fora Recommended Sran�'a�d-Ot'pupattUnat
after 123 days. Also, the n-d?Cane was skin absorbed where Exposure to n"erined Perpleum 5ohents, DHEw (NIOSH) Pub.
application of 1633 grams (total) was applied 3 times No. 77-192 (197,').
i
372
bber' Sf
Z �°,.y �`"g' J.w. Reye 8 �ReG,fy -rt,
2� 0,1
5f0ry 22 C5 �• 05
,JO �pur�
i. .
tt�4 ".. ��Q 1 Jurare °d 5e
3 sfOry
00e) `
rar;�e Fro•
CB f gld9 Frd. moo . ;'-
OrL Q¢
5
r1c ce J " Mario a
3� en yr 33.! ....... ..
ry
d)
5a
er05
Qn sp
5
01 s
4 N
i � B .. 2.5
N
N
I � H
L
rl
,
v
m
N �
^4^
Fdl7.
' af
pi
(w°0a) °
(Cort. /o CA) sk. \v h
�t
13
N
o > 57'01-yell
� f
Ict
Q o =1
m
YJ
42
o �
N '`Exrs�41,V
�
-'
/?emovea/
_ T Locafior� cX
L \ /Q o y,:. �TYCICJ (1
4
m
' � 3 Sfory x
�B/-ic E Qvir�s) p
I-
IF'
V1
Q !
Y y \
i
o
N
it
V
o + "'
�j
7w , \
. x o
rl
tf) 5,41
i
f 111"y Sfo c n
tv
Windsor T us f
Of `SGUQm�7SCOff /
FRANK 90y _. 1' YF L./ �3 ._ {� � ' . .F! ' :_. '• -. --k :',-:f
N
C. y
HANCOCK m
No.7606
CyN�STEReo
SUR`1
P)ENGINEERING
• TECHNOLOGY
P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569•Fax: 978-745-4881
May 12, 1999
Mr. Peter Strout
Building Dept.
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Re: Flvnntan Building, 80.Boston Street Lynn. MA
Dear Mr. Strout,
I have prepared this correspondence regarding the Flynntan Building on 80 Boston Street per our
discussion in April. i have gone through the interior and property with David Bennett of Neptune
Demolition to prepare this estimate of demolition costs. SP Inc. is very familiar with the structure, tanks,
chemicals and soil conditions since we were the tannery's consultant for wastewater treatment and
hazardous waste disposal.
After the company closed we removed over sixty drums and tank contents and prepared a 211E report on
the soils and groundwater. The environmental assessment was updated in 1996 and remediation costs
were estimated. The only significant environmental issues remaining are the sheepg'e.se still an•:, tanks,
(which are mostly empty), the empty 3000 gallon underground solvent tack, the almost empty (butt .
non-leaking relatively new) 10,000 gallon 44 fuel tank under the boiler room incl the 20,000 gallon 96
fuel oil tank in the front that did leak and has contaminated —200 cubic yards of soil. This soil is suitable
for recycling at the Barden Trimount plant.
In regards to the demolition of the `old" wood and brick structure.., only the stili and storage tanks would
have to be removed. The inspection revealed several issues that would require special attention:
I. Separate removal of asbestos siding on exterior of building and transite on hallways.
Estimated 18,000 sq.ft.
2. The brick and wood structure is four stories and contains large steel floor plates, piping and
support cables that will have to be separated from the 40-50 loads of wood debris.
Mr.Peter Strout
May 12, 1944
Page 2
Since the new section of the building is structurally sound and intact the removal area would be
from the Boston Street sidewalk (burned offices) to Goodhue Street and everything to the North
side except for the(2)front loading docks(concrete), the cement slab (in front)and the fieldstone
retaining wall that was the color cellar wall. The outline of the removal area is shown on the Site
Plan.
Q. The concrete block boiler room, brick chimney and elevator shaft would remain. Any open walls
or doors would be sealed and the area would be fenced.
There are(3) 500-1500 gallon hot water tanks that would be cut up for scrap. One of the tanks
does have a thin layer of fibrous asbestos.
�. The four below floor pits, two outside pits and associated trenchs will be filled with brick and
concrete debris to prepare them for closure and sealing.
The Scope of Work for this project would include:
1. Engineering supervision, permits, waste disposal, chemical testing, still and
tank cleaning, final report.
100 Manhours @ $70/hr. $ 7000.00
Wastes and Tests 3500.00
$10,500.00
2. Asbestos removal: exterior, hallways and one tank 18,000 sq.ft.
Removal labor 4 men x 40 hours = 160 hours @ $50/hr. $ 8000.00
Load and Transfer rig 3 Days @ $1500. 4500.00
Transfer and Disposal 4 - 20cy(loads) @ $100/cy 800Q-0-0
$20,500.00
3. Demolition of structure, sort 100 yd/1200, steel, break concrete and brick.
4 Weeks Machinery and Labor @ $7500/wk $30,000.00
Wood Disposal 40- 40 loads @ $1200. 48,000.00
Steel Disposal 4 loads @ $200. 800.00
Brick and Concrete 8 loads @ $300. —.,-Z`L40 0Q
$81,200.00
Total Project Costs $112,200.00
Range $904120,000.00
Mr. Peter Strout
May 12, 1444
Page 3
While these are only estimates we would be glad to prepare a firm quotation upon request. We look
forward to working with you to make the property an asset once again.
Very truly yours,
SP Engineering, Inc.
Bruce A Poole
President
BMPlsm
D
N
STREET
Q S 0 _ 05 ` Store and opartment building
�6 l No. 6 F Galton
Na 6 Fuel Oil
BORE(Typical} U/G —tank
Dunkin Doeads •4 Bui in
r +3
8� (2) 275 Got. No.Z
Fuel Oil AIG Tanks Residence
7s
���L I0, Gal 6
Y T k- b e
Au1C body shop D 6400 Gal. U/G Residence
aQ Solvent Tank 111
Bldg.
' t
(3) Z75 Galton AR3 Tanks * i
DH
OF
S T R E E T
AREA TO BE REMOVED
Property at; 80 BOSTON STREET
SALEM,MA SITE E PLAN
$CIIfe' ["=40'
FIGURE 2
c ? INC
NRY-25-1999 08:51 SP ENGINEERING 19787454569 P.01i05
ENGINEERING INC.
P.O. Box 348 • Sulem. Massachusetts 01970 • Telephone: 1978) 745 4569 • Fax: (978) 745 4881
FAX COVER SHEET
..Cf)a&v S1,9419s T •
(f'ead Tw
crate• H( -
�mp�yr
T lepkoae of Jax : ! 7q-_ �-5q t
Gf'a. of pine �ea6 inc•ludiiiy cods t/jee6
f thew are mry gueWmi as Wi informa449x. p&aw cull•
&mpwy. S.P. Inc
Telepkoae: (9781745-4569
✓ccr cfafla es (9781.745-4881
ci0dililioaa6 �amaeealc
NRY-25-1999 08:51 SP ENGINEERING 19787454569 P.02Z05
[PENGINEERING
• TECHNOLOGY
P.O. Box 848•Salem,Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569•Fax:978-745-4881
May 12, 1999
Mr, Peter Strout
Building Dept.
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
Re: .Budding 80 Boston,Street. Lyuri,.AIA
Dear Mr. Strout,
1 have prepared this correspondence regarding the Flynntan Building on 80 Boston Street per our
discussion in April. I have gone through the interior and property with David Bennett of Neptune
Demolition to prepare this estimate of demolition costs. SP Inc. is very familiar with the structure, tanks,
chemicals and soil conditions since we were the tannery's consultant for wastewater treatment and
hazardous waste disposal.
After the company closed we removed over sixty drums and tank contents and prepared a 21 E report on
the soils and groundwater. The environmental assessment was updated in 1996 and remediation costs
were estimated. The only significant environmental issues remaining are the sheepgrease still and tanks
(which are mostly empty), the empty 3000 gallon underground solvent tank, the almost empty(but
non-leaking relatively new) 10,000 gallon#4 fuel tank under the boiler room and the 20,000 gallon 46
Orel oil tank in the front that did leak and has contaminated—200 cubic yards of soil. This soil is suitable
for recycling at the Bardon Trimount plant.
In regards to the demolition of the"old" wood and brick structure;only the still and storage tanks would
have to be removed. The inspection revealed several issues that would require special attention:
1. Separate removal of asbestos siding on exterior of building and transite on hallways.
Estimated 18,000 sq.ft.
2. The brick and wood structure is four stories and contains large steel floor plates, piping and
support cables that will have to be separated from the 40-50 loads of wood debris.
MOY-25-1999 08:52 SP ENGINEERING 19787454569 P.03i05
Mc Peter Strout
May 12, 1999
Page 2
3. Since the new section of the building is structurally sound and intact the removal area would be
from the Boston Street sidewalk(burned offices)to Goodhue Street and everything to the North
side except for the(2)front loading docks (concrete), the cement slab (in front) and the fieldstone
retaining wall that was the color cellar wall. The outline of the removal area is shown on the Site
Plan,
4. The concrete block boiler room, brick chimney and elevator shaft would remain, Any open walls
or doors would be sealed and the area would be fenced.
5, There are(3) 500-1500 gallon hat water tanks thatwould be cut up for scrap. One of the tanks
does have a thin layer of fibrous asbestos.
6. The four below floor pits, two outside pits and associated trenchs will be filled with brick and
concrete debris to prepare them for closure and sealing.
The Scope of Work for this project would include:
1. Engineering supervision, permits, waste disposal, chemical testing, still and
tank cleaning, final report.
100 Manhours @$70/ht. $ 7000.00
Wastes and Tests 350000
$10,500.00
2. Asbestos removal: exterior, hallways and one tank 18,000 sq.ft.
Removal labor 4 men x 40 hours= 160 hours @$50/hr. $ 8000.00
Load and Transfer rig 3 Days @ $1500. 4500,00
Transfer and Disposal 4-20cy (loads) @$100/cy $040.44
$20,500.00
3. Demolition of structure, sort 100 yd/1200, steel, break concrete and brick.
4 Weeks Machinery and Labor @$7500/wk $30,000.00'
Wood Disposal 40-40 loads @$1200_ 48,000.00
Steel Disposal 4 loads @$200. 800.00
Brick and Concrete 8 loads @$300. 2400 00
$81,200.00
Total Project Costs $112,200,00
Range $90-$120,000.00
MAY-25-1999 09:52 SP ENGINEERING 19797454569 P.04i05
Mr.Peter Strout
May 12, 1999
Pagc 3
While these are only estimates we would be glad to prepare a firm quotation upon request. We look
forward to working with you to make the property an asset once again.
Very truly yours,
SP Engineering, Inc. -
Bruce M lei
President
BMP/sm
_ � � a
N .
0
STREET
S .f 0 1A *z Sims and apantnacd building
� Os-
` 6 LY
24,040 Gallon ;
Na. 6 fuel Oil
t;F-(Typwwl u/G Tank
E>unkin 0arufs 8a(
i4 •3
l / �
10
$e F%W 01 A/G T=ks ` Residence
.00
z propeft 1.1" 74 Ryvmdl ,+•*'11 ! Gi! 6
IIt T k- `
Aakt�shop ' Q�Q 6,000 G l.kG Residence
U5 old%
z ^-ter /
a 13) 275 Gultan AM Tanks
G 0
STREET
C) AREA TO BE REMOVED
N Prop", at 80 BOSTON STREET
} SALEM,MA SITE PLAN
F
' t BETA Engineering, Inc.
' Engineers • Scientists • Planners
HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS CONSULTING SERVICES
at
' FlynnTan Manufacturing Building
Boston Street
' Salem, MA
\r Prepared for:
' Mr. Peter K. Strout, Building Inspector
Department of Public Facilities
City of Salem
' One Salem Green
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
1
Prepared by:
BETA Engineering, Inc.
6 Blackstone Valley Place
Lincoln, RI 02865
' May 17, 1999
i
' 1420 Providence Highway(Rte.1) Norwood, MA02062 781255.1982 fax: 781.255.1974 email: BETA@BETA-eng.com
6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln, RI 02865 401.3332382 fax: 401.333.9225 email: BETA@BETA-eng.com
1
1
CONTENTS
1 Section Page
Introduction 1
1 1. Scope of Work 1
1 2. Proposed Fees 5
1
1
.1
r'
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
BETA Engineering, Inc. SWA 99127
5/17/99
1
INTRODUCTION
' We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide asbestos inspection services and
subsequent abatement design at the F1ynnTan Manufacturing Company located at the
corner of Goodhue and Boston Streets in Salem, Massachusetts.
' Anticipated services include the identification of asbestos-containing building materials
(ACBM), lead based paint(LBP), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in light fixture
ballast, and mercury filled fluorescent light bulbs throughout the building. The field
assessment will also allow us to evaluate appropriate abatement options and properly
define the scope of abatement work. We will prepare technical specifications and provide
monitoring and oversight during the abatement work.
' 1. SCOPE OF WORK
' Asbestos Inspection Phase
The inspection for suspect ACBM will be conducted by highly trained and experienced
asbestos inspectors, who are appropriately certified as Asbestos Inspectors by the
' Massachusetts Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD). Before
walking through the building, we shall review existing documents, drawings and building
specifications, if available, for original construction information and past findings
' pertaining to the installation of suspect ACBM. In this way, we may be able to identify
the type and location of some of the suspect ACBM in the building while conducting
minimal sampling and analysis. As necessary, we shall collect bulk samples of those
' suspect materials that have not been adequately addressed in any existing documentation.
In general, we shall make observations for both friable (easily crumbled, crushed, or
' pulverized) and nonfriable suspect ACBM on the interior and exterior of the building,
including:
' • thermal system insulation, such as pipe,boiler, tank, and duct insulation;
• surfacing materials, such as fireproofing, acoustical and decorative plasters, or other
' coatings applied by spray or trowel; and
• miscellaneous materials, such as floor and ceiling tiles, mastics, roofing materials and
window glazing.
' Not all building materials will be considered to be suspect ACBM. Certain materials,
such as fiberglass (pink or yellow), brick, concrete, wood, glass, and rubber can visually
' be identified as nonsuspect ACBM. Also, friable materials that are known to have been
installed after 1980 will not be considered suspect. If documentation is available
' indicating that nonfriable materials do not contain asbestos, these materials also will not
be considered to be suspect ACBM. We will refer to all such documentation in our report.
By classifying certain materials as nonsuspect, we can minimize sampling and the
' associated costs of analyzing the materials.
BETA Engineering, Inc. sW a 99127
Page 1 5/11/99
1
Our sampling protocol is based upon our prior experience and the following EPA
guidance documents:
• The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, 40 CFR Part 763
• Asbestos in Buildings: A Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing
Materials, (EPA Document 560/5-85-030a, October, 1985)
' • Asbestos Exposure Assessment in Buildings, Inspection Manual (Yellow Book)
• Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings (EPA
Document 560/5-85-024)
To determine the asbestos content of suspect materials, we shall collect representative
' bulk samples using the following protocol:
• For thermal system insulation, a minimum of three samples of each type, except for
' small patched areas (less than six square feet), in which case at least one sample will
be collected;
' • For surfacing materials, a minimum of three samples of each type of material present
in quantities less than 5,000 square feet, and a minimum of five samples of each type
of material present in quantities equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet; and
• For miscellaneous materials, at least one sample of each type of material present in
quantities less than 500 square feet, and a minimum of two samples of each type of
material present in quantities equal to or greater than 500 square feet.
While adhering to strict safety precautions, we shall collect samples of those materials
that are readily accessible and can be sampled without damaging existing finishes. The
' samples that we collect will be as small as reasonably feasible in order to obtain a
representative portion of the material. The samples will be collected in a discrete manner
throughout the buildings. Sample locations will be repaired with caulking, sealant, or
' other appropriate material.
Bulk samples will be analyzed by a licensed asbestos analytical laboratory. The analytical
' method used will be Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the method
described in 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F,Appendix A. This method is sensitive to the
presence of asbestos fibers, typically at less than one percent of the sample composition.
' In instances where multiple samples of a similar homogeneous material are collected, the
laboratory will be directed to analyze each sample of the material until a positive result is
obtained (i.e., a sample containing greater than 1% asbestos).
' Although PLM is the method accepted by the EPA for detecting the presence of asbestos
' in bulk samples, it is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor tiles and in
some other types of resinously bound materials. Therefore, if less than one percent
asbestos is detected in a floor tile, confirmatory analysis using Transmission Electron
' Microscopy (TEM) is the preferred method. Because this method is quite expensive in
BETA Engineering, Inc. swA 99127
' Page 2 5/11/99
' comparison to PLM, we generally recommend conducting this analysis only if the
material will definitely be impacted by the demolition.
Lead Inspection
To identify LBP, we will test representative surfaces throughout the building. This
investigation will include identifying the lead content of paints, on walls, ceilings,
window and doors, including casings, baseboard, cabinets, and so forth. We will use a
portable X-Ray fluorescence analyzer(XRFA), a nondestructive sampling device that
allows us to test multiple surfaces quickly and accurately. The XRFA uses a radioactive
source to excite the electrons of lead atoms (if present) in paint. As the lead atom
electrons return to their normal state, they emit x-rays that are measured by the XRFA.
' These data are then processed by the instrument and the results converted to milligrams
of lead per square centimeter of sampled surface area. The results are provided on a
digital display to the nearest tenth of a milligram per square centimeter. An x-ray
' spectrum is also displayed that may be analyzed by the inspector to assist in determining
the depth of lead and possible interferences.
' Typically, to determine the appropriate disposal methods of lead-bearing wastes,
sampling and analysis using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) must
be conducted. However, if testing of the paints indicates minimal concentrations of LBP,
the TCLP testing may not be necessary. Also, depending on the findings of the LBP
inspection, it may be more prudent to include TCLP testing as part of the contractor's bid.
Thus, we have not included the costs for the collection and analysis of samples for the
TCLP in our base fee.
' PCBs, and Mercury Filled Fluorescent Bulbs Inspection
Our investigation for PCBs will be visual only. We will identify those light fixture
ballasts that contain PCBs by reading the identification marks on top of each ballast.
' Typically, ballasts installed after 1978 do not contain PCBs and are marked as such. Our
report will identify the location, type, and quantity of ballasts present throughout the
buildings. We will also identify the number of fluorescent bulbs.
' Exclusions
Interior and exterior inspection will only be performed to the extent safe and feasible.
Because the structural integrity of certain areas of the building has been compromised,
such as roof and floor systems, these areas cannot be assessed. Thus, we may make
assumptions regarding hazardous building materials that may be present within these
' areas. Because of these and other limitations, some additional follow-up inspection work
may be required. We will not patch finishes where destructive testing is performed.
Because of these and other limitations, some additional follow-up inspection work may
' be required.
Inspection Report Preparation (Optional)
On the basis of the information gathered during the inspection, we shall provide a report
detailing our findings and appropriate recommendations for remedial action. The report
will include the results of all sample analysis, an inventory of ACBM, LBP, mercury
1
BETA Engineering, Inc. swA 99127
' Page 3 5/11/99
filled fluorescent bulbs and PCBs, the result of our assessment of hazards, and
appropriate recommendations for abating or handling potentially hazardous building
materials.
On the basis of the information gathered during the inspections, we will provide a report
' summarizing the data. The report shall include an inventory of LBP and regulatory
guidance. We will address issues associated with (1) airborne emissions of lead to the
environment, (2) worker exposure to lead, and (3) disposal of wastes containing lead. We
' will also provide a summary of the requirements of the OSHA lead in construction
standard, 1926.62.
t Design ?base
Based on the results of our evaluation of existing ACBM, we will prepare site specific
technical asbestos abatement specifications. The specifications address a detailed scope of
' work for each area requiring abatement, including the required work area preparations,
engineering controls, work practices, and asbestos waste disposal practices that the
contractor must implement.
' Technical specifications will also be prepared that accurately define the scope of the work
related to existing LBP and all responsibilities of the abatement contractor. The
specifications will address requirements for preparation of abatement work areas and
engineering controls, required work practices and methodologies for abatement or
handling of materials containing lead. In addition, the specifications will address the
requirements for disposal of lead wastes.
' For PCBs in light fixture ballast and mercury in fluorescent bulbs, technical
specifications will be prepared detailing the procedures required by the contractor for
their removal and disposal.
' Abatement Monitoring and Oversight (Recommended Additional Service)
We have also provided information and unit costs associated with monitoring and
oversight of the project. One of our certified Abatement Project Monitors will perform
the oversight. We will provide the following tasks:
' • Preabatement visual inspection of abatement work area
• Spot checks both within and outside the containment barriers to check integrity of
' barriers and the use of appropriate work practices by the contractor
• Final visual inspection of each work area to assure no visible debris is remaining after
' abatement
• Final clearance monitoring and analysis
• Final report documenting monitoring results, including analytical results, daily
construction logs, and other pertinent information relative to the abatement
' BETA Engineering, Inc. swa 99127
Page 4 5/11/99
' Before abatement is allowed to proceed, we will observe the following: the integrity of
the polyethylene barriers that enclose the work area and the covering of immovable
' objects inside the work area, the proper set-up of the decontamination chamber(including
ensuring that it is contiguous to the work area and has a functional shower supplied with
warm water), that hazard warning signs are posted, where necessary, and the proper
' positioning and function of the air-filtration devices used to establish negative pressure.
In addition, all Department of Public Health certifications for abatement personnel will be
checked. We will not authorize the start of the actual abatement process until all pre-
abatement requirements are fulfilled by the contractor.
During the abatement process, we will perform spot checks, our project monitor will
' enter the abatement work area to observe the contractor's work practices and correct any
deficiencies. This would include making observations pertaining to correct handling,
proper containerization and labeling of waste,proper worker decontamination, air
' monitoring and so forth.
When the contractor indicates that abatement work is completed, we will conduct a final
' visual inspection of each work area. We will inspect the work area for any visible debris
that may remain. If visible debris is detected, additional cleaning will be required. Once
the visual inspection is complete,we will authorize the contractor to apply lock-down
' encapsulant to seal any nonvisible residue that may remain. After a suitable drying period
is observed (typically an overnight period), we will conduct final clearance air
monitoring. Typically, aggressive sampling techniques will be employed. Aggressive
' sampling includes agitating surfaces within the work area using a leaf-blower and 20 inch
fans. Air samples will be analyzed by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) in accordance
with NIOSH Method 7400.
' At the completion of the project, we will prepare a report that documents the results of all
monitoring conducted at the site.
' 2. PROPOSED FEES
' In accordance with our proposed scope of work for the building, we will provide
consulting services for the following fees:
1
' BETA Engineering, Inc. swA 99127
Page 5 5/11/99
1
• Inspection for ACBM $ 1,400.
• Analysis of 100 asbestos bulk samples by PLM at a cost of 1,400.
$14/sample (5 day tum around)
' • Inspection for LBP 750.
• Mercury filled fluorescent bulb testing(TCLP) 175.
' • Inspection for PCBs 350.
• Data interpretation, and preparation of inspection report 600.
(Optional)
• Preparation of Asbestos specifications 1,750.
' • Preparation of Lead specifications 1000.
• Preparation of PCBs specification 500.
' • Project management including but not limited to site 750.
meetings, interpretation of regulatory and specification issues
and general oversight etc.
' • Abatement monitoring (8 estimated shifts @ $450/shift ) 3,600.
• Abatement monitoring summary report 575.
' Total Proposed fee $12,850.
' Unit Costs for Additional Consulting Services
Certified Asbestos Inspector/PCBs Inspector $60/hour
' Licensed Lead Inspector(including use of XRF analyzer) $65/hour
Project Manager $75/hour
Senior Project Manager $100/hour
Bulk Sample Analysis by PLM (5-day turnaround) $14/each
Bulk Sample Analysis by TEM (5-day turnaround) $60/each
*Project Monitor Shift Rate $450/shift
Project Monitor $55/hr
Air Sample Analysis by PCM $12/each
Mileage $0.40/mile
Reimbursable Expenses Cost plus 15%
* Daily rate for project monitor includes travel time to and from the site, mileage costs
and analysis of PCM air samples.
If more or fewer than the estimated number of asbestos bulk samples are analyzed by
PLM, the cost shall be increased or decreased, accordingly at a cost of$14/sample.
However, any additional costs would not be conducted without first receiving client
authorization.
' BETA Engineering, Inc. swA 99127
Page 6 5/11/99
1
Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to proceeding soon with this project.
Respectfully submitted,
' BETA Engineering, Inc.
Mic er--:'be isser, PE, RLS, LSP
riior Project Manager
Accepted by:
' City of Salem Date
Department of Public Facilities
' Print Name Title
BETA Engineering, Inc. SwA 99127
Page 7 5/11/99