Loading...
19 BOSTON STREET - BUILDING JACKET ,� '� n k D %Tt CITY OF SILLENI, NLkSSACHUSETTS M. r BOARD OF APPEAL , � . a 120 AC'�<iu�i,t �,v Sruii r >.v.i.�i.�Lir.r-:rr�019-0 978 . P ITAR"l-1"A q: 20 FILE ri CITY CLERti. SALEM, t1A.aS March 4, 2013 Decision City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Petition of ELEONORA F. KOSKI TRUST, MIKE RAMAZIO, TRUSTEE, requesting a variance from Sec. 4.1.1 of the Salem "Zoning Ordinance, in order to allow the existing buildings with less than the minimum required lot frontage, width and area on the property located at 19 & 25 Boston Street (B-2, R-3 "Zoning Districts). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on February 20, 2013 pursuant to bass General Law Ch. 40A, § 1'1. The hearing was closed on February 20, 2013 with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair), Annie Harris, Richard Dionne, Tom Watkins, jimmy 'I'sitsim)s (Alternate) and David Eppley (Alternate). Petitioner seeks a Variance to Section 4.1.1 Tlible o`Dimensional Requinwients of the S City of Salem Zoning Ordinances. Statements of fact: 1. Mr. Giaimo, Attorney for Robinson & Cole, presented the petition for the owner Eleonora F. Kiski Trust and Mike Ramazio, Trustee for the property at 19 & 25 Boston Street (B-2, R-3 Zoning District). ? In the petition, dated January 28, 2013, the petitioner requested Variances from the minimum lot area (12,000 sq. ft.), lot width (100 ft.), and lot frontage (100 ft.) requirements of Section 4.1.1 Mahle of Dlmlensional Requiirimenlr in the S City of Salem Zoning Ordinances for the property at -19 & 25 Boston Street. The petitioner's proposed parcel dimensions included: - 19 Boston Street: Lot Frontage 93.37 ft; Lot Width 90.9 ft; Lot :Area 10,611 sq. ft. - 25 Boston Street: Lot Frontage 35.00 Et; Lot Width 41.2 ft. 3. '['lie petitioner's proposed liardship necessitating the need for the Variances included the unique topography of the parcels in question. Furthermore, ;in ANR plan adjusting the property- boundaries was already approved by the Planning Board in MO. 4. There was no public present at the meering to speak in opposition or support to the Variance requests. Additionally, no written comments from the public Nvere received prior to the public hearing. I'he Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of rile ccidence presented ;It rhe public hearing, and after thorough revie%e of the plans and petition %LlbnlitrCd, makes rhe t�0llowing findings: I. The desired relief nt:n, he granted wirhour dcuintenr to the public good :tad \�irhout nullikin;; or subsrantialk deror;,tring from the intent or purpose of the (.its of LSalem %oning ()nlinances. ,t Salem Board of Appeals March 4, 2013 Project: 19 &2i Boston Strect Pulte 2 of 2 2. "Che literal enforcement of the Cin of Salcm Zoning Ordinance's Table of Dimensional Requirements would be physically impossible to apply clic to the unique topographical formations present on the parcels ill question. 3. In permitting such relief, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions and safeguards as noted below. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of,Appeals concludes: 1. 'Che petitioner's Variances requesting relief to Section 4.1.1 Table o/'Dimeatdonal Requirements of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinances is granted as shown on the submitted plans. In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted to approve the Variances being requested, Five (5) in favor (its. Curran ((:hair), DIs. Harris, :Mr. Dionne, Mr. Watkins, and Mr. 'rsitsinos (Alternate) and none (0) opposed. The Board of .Appeals voted to grant petitioner's request for a Variance subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards: I_ petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted does not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the strucrtre(s) located on the subject property- to an extent of more than Fifty percent (50(I'o) of its floor area or more than Fifty percent (501-ii) of its replacement cost at the time of destruction. If the structure is demolished by any means to an extent of more than Fifty percent (50°.o) of its replacement cost or more than fifty percent (5044) of its floor area at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance. Rebecca Curran, Chair Salem Board of Appeals A CHP1'(W IIf1f UH(.ISION Ifns IMHIN I IH I)M Il['I'IIlf PI.ANNIN(; MUD-ANJ) If Ilierrelli Ilk fppeallinni Ibis rleuoion, it auy, iAd/Ge made(nrinanl/n Serlmn l7 n//Ae.lhurd,httrz/li General Lain 0)a ler 10,1, od ibrr//he 1ilvl nilhin 20 by n/filing nl IN,,dea.io n in the )Iji,e nJ the City Clerk. Pori«oil in /he Ahh-aehuiell, General 1 aai CAolrler 10A, 5e,7ior 1/, Me I Fina n,t or S peaal Permll_gronled heron TedI nnl lake qp,t uan/il a.apy of the&,i.rinn hea nnq the,erli/i we o/the Oil Clerk Aa;been filed+pill,the I;.ors S"10,R,XiO3 n/Oeedr. Salem Laundry Company January 12, 1990 One Lafayette Street Salem, Ma 01970 y G City of Salem Office of the Building InspectorOOD sn Salem, Ma 01970 yon ;.n o tri''1-re � n :R;- ea 19Boston Stree] Vic+ g m As requested and to whom it may concern: w p Salem Laundry Company will not place the eight dryers along the back wall in service, until such a time as Boston Gas increases the capacity of the gas service to accommodate the increased lead, and the installation of said dryers are subsequently re-inspected. We anticipate that this work will be completed in late March or early April of this year . We also understand that our certificate of occupancy will be issued upon completion of the above stated work. David, thankyou for your assistance and partnership in getting our store open, I appreciate it , our employees and subcontractors appreciate it , but most importantly the our customers do ! Sincere nes Whitmore, Vice President Salem Laundry Company MY OOMMl5510NN7JEXPIRES APRIL_'!!1888 FIELD REPORT =DEFALCO'ENGINEERING INC: 617.720.4848 «• DATE .roe No.j � i0� b dec a� e9- cf ,a 197 PORTLAND STREET BOSTON MA 02114 • h 7 ,'Y } 1 }i .t. £ A '; -�' d"'I.'.� '�` Y LOCATION..p. ( M/ +x'd aR • u UN may, :a..n Tr n. *. 't}" •, 9�» ` � /lo5fe.� .f! ✓Q/P/✓�'• a /T CONTRACTOR OV✓NER �, f�Gq//b �• � f70 Li4 / +CS =c..� .... - * h.. WEATHER � � r L6L > Essrx _ Vf TEM' AT AM aRE -s�E SENT AT T .. _ . FOLLOWING WAS NOTED` w y A "x a " t !. . Tie Str <f�re � .er/< ..:�/�e o b ^ ..ov✓ _Llrac� J—✓ 4, ' s o . Je ..1 r Icacto r/ t.�,Tar4.i.t ✓ „`v /!"L. `�C To ///O`v�» .CXC e�.T"<•a 1.V ., , v _ � - i.. P xGO�..� Ycf •ew ^ /S•p ko..f tic ,' .t �i >�rt.�ed xo-�fe -fL•c ,4 bolfj � bo/fS , "�•e f'o. yl.•orfJ . .✓Clp��t f wf 'y ` NfW K C m p Go 0 rIn :m -. - 'An pp fop a» y3' & e / e w COPIES TO ter' -;«. .`,. ...�....:,°.:,..._x.p.. a-..« s µs fl 4/YM- B✓• lr1 L•..�/jt f/, q /r✓cN TfG� lI SIGNED �.✓C-/i•-fir. Lb1a.`� /' uy"iri� 032005 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 8968 �� PROJECT TITLE: Salem Laundry PROJECT LOCATION: X19 Boston Street, Salem, MA NAME OF BUILDING: Former Maytag Laundromat NATURE OF PROJECT: Renovations to accommodate new laundry IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILMNG V3DE, c I, Frank D. DeFalco Registration No. 20189'baa BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THArr HAS PRE99RED; m OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTAT A 5 SPECIFICA -=t TIONS CONCERNING: X4 .. ;am ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL XX FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK ISPROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of slop dratangs, samples and other sutmittals of the contractor as required by the cornstruction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS (EVERY TWO WEEKS WHEN MY TRADE IS ACTIVE ON SITE) TO THE CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR. . UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT P. FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANC COMMQNWEALTH._OF MASSACHUSETTS Worcester SS SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED ANDD SWORN TO BEFORE B®EFORE ME THIS 17thDAY OF October 19 89. /KC Clic- l�✓ 31t- .Q.�Gf i NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 10/2/92 Cftp of 6aiem, Nnoacbm5ettg Public Propertp Mepartment ��s .. e �3uitDing department One butem green 745-9595 ext. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer September 14 , 1989 Salem Laundry c/o Jim Whitmore 1 Lafayette Street Salem, MA . 01970 RE : 19 Boston Street Dear Mr . Whitmore , On September 7 , 1989 a site visit was made at the above . referenced property . Upon inspection it was noted that the rear addition appears to have been built without the benefit of a permit . This structure is inadequate structurally for its in— tended use and must be removed . Please contact me for any further assistance . Sind-rely , David J . Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/eaf C . C . City Solicitor Ward Councillor