Loading...
2010 TRANSFER STATION LAWSUIT-SUMMONS & DOCUMENTS(TO PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: Please Circle Type of Action Involved. - T MOTOR VEHICLE TORT - CONTRACT - EQUITABLE RELIEF -CT— . COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX,ss. L� / 1/ r /0 SUPERIORCOURT ATTEST: A TRUE COPY CIVILACTION No. 2010-0574-A r CONSTABLE ARTHUR THEOPHILOPOULOS ET ALS ' & DISINTERESTIiD...PARTY................................................................................................:....................Plaintiff(s) T N L V � U o THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE CITY OF SALEM �y m U SUMMONS E a_ s To the above named Defendant: The Board of Health of the City of Salem r o Carl D. Goodman Esq. w You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon p 152 Lynnway, Suite 1E, Lynn, MA 01902 w plaintiff's attorney, whose address is an answer to the Ay c m o c complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the V Q N C day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the y9 !e complaint. You are also required to file your answer to the complaint in the office of the Clerk of this court at d Salem oeither before service upon plaintiff's attorney or within a reasonable time thereafter V Unless otherwise provided by Rule 13 (a), your answer must state as a counterclaim any claim which you may have against the plaintiff which arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff's oc claim or you will thereafter be barred from making such claim in any other action. n 3 `m c 3 m c ro o .. WITNESS, BARBARA 1. ROUSE , Esquire, at Salem, the `3 29'day of Mazch in the year of our Lord two thousand ten O z z0 O U z� w J C); e T 0 o Clerk zro NOTES: 1. This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. When more than one defendant is involved, the names of all defendants should appear in the caption. If a separate summons is used for each defendant, each should be addressed to the particular defendant. CIVIL ACTIONK '`" Trial Court of Massachusetts A COVER SHEET Superior Court Department County: /";- PLAINTIFF(SI n 1 �Q - DEFENDANT(S) .. lrv:G TEOAS�/ tbpa U LOS T i —i (� r9 t og dfr .A6AmJT O F we G 1,1 o F Sig t ATTORNEY, FIRM NAME, ADDRESS AND E CAR L D, ,e' 004DK ATTORNEY (o known) /5.Z tYw�,uw,Fy—S�wf6�+F IVNN.KAo,40� Board of Bar overseen nunber..id(- Origin code and track designation lace an x in one box. only: ❑ 4. F04 District Court Appeal c.231; s:97. &104 (After 1. F01 Original Complaint- trial) (X) 2. F02 Removal to Sup.Ct. C.231,s.104 ❑ 5. F05 Reactivated after rescdpt; relief from (Before trial) (F) JudgmenttOrder (Mass.R.Civ.P 60) OO ❑ 3. F03 Retransferto Sup.Ct. C.231,s.102C (X) 6.510 Summary Process Appeal (1) , TYPE. 01: ACTION AND TRACK DESIGNATION (See reverse side) QgDE NO. TYPE OF ACTION (Specify) TRACK IS THIS A'JURY CASE? ��Q? fTG6-AJCyi41_ A) b<) ( )Yes No The following is a full, temized and detailed statement of the facts on which plaintiff re es to determine money.damages. For this form, disregard doubiefor treble damage claims; indicate single damages only. . TORT CLAIMS (Attach additional sheets as necessary) A. Documented medical expenses to date: 1. Total hospital expenses...........................:................................$.........:.: 2. Total Doctor expenses ..........................................................$...........: 3. Total chiropractic expenses........................................................ $ ........... . 4. Total physical therapy expenses ..................................................... 5. Total other expenses (describe) ....................................: . . ...,... .. ..$.......... . Subtotal $ ... B. .Documented lost wages and compensation to date .................................:....... $ ........... , . Documented property damages to date .............................. :.... . ............. $ ........... . D. Reasonably anticipated future medical and hospital expenses ................................ $., .,::.:.... . E. Reasonably anticipated lost wages .................................................... $ C.. _....... . F. Other documented items of damages (describe) G. Brief description of plaintiff's injury, including nature and extent of injury (describe) .......... TOTAL $............. CONTRACT CLAIMS (Attach additional sheets as necessary). ,. ::::..:.:.:.... .. . Provide a detailed description.of claim(s): TOTAL S. ;...:......... PLEASE IDENTIFY, BY CASE NUMBER, NAME AND COUNTY, ANY RELATED ACTION PENDING IN THE SUPERIOR . COURT DEPARTMENT I hereby certify that 1 have compiled with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Supreme Judicial Court Uniform Rules on Dispute Resolution (SJC Rule 1:18) requiring that I my clients with Information about court -connected dispute resolution services and discuss with Ill 111101 t ges and disadvantages of. the various methods:' Signature of of Record Attomey A,a&C. 1-z000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts County of Essex The Superior Court CIVIL DOCKET# ESCV2010-00574-A RE: Theophilopoulos et al v The Board of Health of the City of Salem TO:Carl D Goodman, Esquire Goodman Law Offices 152 Lynnway, Suite 1 E Lynna.,MA 01902 . TRACKING ORDER - X TRACK (Administrative Agency Appeal - 30A) You are hereby notified that this case is on the track referenced above as per Superior Court Standing Order 1-88 The order requires that the various stages of litigation described below must be completed not later than the deadlines indicated. For claims filed pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, sec. 14, G.L. c. 249, sec. 4 or similar statutes, please T also refer to Superior Court Standing Order 1-96 and the tracking deadlines set forth in that Order. In particular, note that a request for a copy of the transcript of the agency hearing testimony must be made by a party within thirty (30) days after service of the Complaint. The administrative agency whose proceedings al?e to be judicially reviewed shall, by way of answer, file the original or certified copy of the record of the proceeding under review (the record) within ninety (90) days after service of the Complaint. In addition, a motion pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings and supporting memorandum shall be served within thirty (30) days of the service of the record or of the Court's decision on any motion specified in paragraph 3 of Superior Court Standing Order 1-96, whichever is later. STAGES OF LITIGATION DEADLINES Service of process made and return filed with the Court by 06/16/2010 case shall be resolved and judgment shall issue by 03/13/2011. 03/13/2011 Counsel for plaintiff must serve this tracking order on defendant before the deadline for filing return of service. Dated: 03/23/2010 Thomas H. Driscoll Jr. Clerk of the Court Location: CtRm 2 -rear (Salem) Telephone: (978) 744-5500 ext. 414 (Brennan) or 377 (Patten) Disabled individuals who need handicap accommodations should contact the Administrative Office of the Superior Court at COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS: SUPERIOR COURT DEPT. OF THE TRIAL COURT Civil Action # 2010-0574-A ARTHUR THEOPHILOPOULOS, JAMES T. RUSH, BRUCE GLINSKI, MATTHEW CIVIELLO, MARY CIVIELLO, TODD SIEGEL, SCOTT MORGAN, TERRI MORGAN, ANTHONY JERMYN, DEBORAH GALLO, ALAN SAMILJAN, YOUNG WORLD ACADEMY, INC., ANARPET REALTY, INC., THOMAS L. MCAULIFFE, TRUSTEE OF HUTCHINSON REALTY TRUST, BRUCE GLINSKY, TRUSTEE OF GREEN DOLPHIN VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM TRUST, ROGER AND JULIO, INC., NEW TRI -CITY REALTY CORP., AND ONE WAY LUMBER CORP., PLAINTIFFS -v- THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DEFENDANT MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER Pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. R. 4(c), the Plaintiff moves that this Honorable Court appoint.. Constable PAUL MINSKY of Swampscott, Massachusetts, being a disinterested person; or his designee, as Special Process Server for the service of all process in this action. Respectfully submitted, The Plaintiffs By attom Dated: March 26, 2010 ARL D. GOODMAN Goodman Law Offices 152 Lynnway, Suite IE Lynn, MA 01902 Tel: (781) 593-2016 Fax: (781) 592-1129 BBO No. 201720 Email: carl@atto^ ^^^am^^ ^^^ Lw office of CSA D. Goudm 152 Ly .y Lyng MA 01902 791-593-2016 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ESSEX, SS: SUPERIOR COURT DEPT. OF THE TRIAL COURT Civil Action # 2010-00574-A ARTHUR THEOPHILOPOULOS, JAMES T. RUSH, BRUCE GLINSKI, MATTHEW CIVIELLO, MARY CIVIELLO, TODD SIEGEL, SCOTT MORGAN, TERRI MORGAN, ANTHONY JERMYN, DEBORAH GALLO, ALAN SAMILJAN, YOUNG WORLD ACADEMY, INC., ANARPET REALTY, INC., THOMAS L. MCAULIFFE, TRUSTEE OF HUTCHINSON REALTY TRUST, BRUCE GLINSKY, TRUSTEE OF GREEN DOLPHIN VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM TRUST, ROGER AND JULIO, INC., NEW TRI -CITY REALTY CORP., AND ONE WAY LUMBER CORP., PLAINTIFFS -v- THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE CITY OF SALEM, DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an appeal pursuant to G.L. Chapter 30A Section 14 from an agency decision -endered by the City of Salem Board of Health granting a "minor modification" to a Site Assignment for the City of Salem Transfer Station located at 12 Swampscott Road in Salem, Massachusetts. The plaintiffs, collectively, are a group of residents, businesses, and taxpayers who seek a udgment vacating the decision of the Board of Health as arbitrary, capricious, and in excess of its authority, and contrary to the requirements of G.L. Chapter 111 Section 150A and 150A'h and L.offi.e I Regulations appearing at 310 CMR 16:00 et seq. C.1 D. Good® 152 Lym Ly M 01902 781-593-2016 PARTIES & CLAIM The plaintiffs: Arthur Theophilopoulos of 24 Valley Street, Salem, Massachusetts, James T. Rush of 17 Madeline Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, Bruce Glinski of 33 Cavendish Circle, Salem, Massachusetts, Matthew Civiello of 3 Savona Street, Salem, Massachusetts, Mary Civiello of Savona Street, Salem, Massachusetts, Todd Siegel of 26 Brittania Circle, Salem, Massachusetts, Scott Morgan of 7 Savona Street, Salem, Massachusetts, Terri Morgan of 7 Savona Street, Salem, Massachusetts, Anthony Jermyn of 50 Ravenna Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, Deborah Gallo of 54 Valley Street, Salem, Massachusetts, and Alan Samiljan of 51 Cavendish Circle, Unit C, Salem, Massachusetts, are individuals, residents and taxpayers in the City of Salem. 2. The plaintiff, Young World Academy, Inc. ("Young World Academy") is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts having its principal office at 3 Green Ledge Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. 3. The plaintiff, Anarpet Realty, Inc. ("Anarpet Realty"), is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts having its principal office at 3 Green Ledge Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, and owns the real property known as and numbered 3 Green Ledge Street, Salem, Massachusetts. 4. The plaintiff, Thomas L. McAuliffe, is the Trustee of the Hutchinson Realty Trust ("Hutchinson Realty"), having its principal office at 333 Highland Avenue, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. 5. The plaintiff, Bruce Glinsky, is a Trustee of the Green Dolphin Village Condominium Trust, located at the intersections of Swampscott Road, First Street, and Whaler's Lane, Salem, Massachusetts and is authorized by a majority of the trustees to appeal the Decision of the Salem Board of Health hereinafter referenced. 6. The plaintiff, Roger and Julio, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts having its principal office at 376 Highland Avenue, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. Law Ofi. of Cml D. Good. 152 Lyanway Lyng MA 01902 781-593-2016 Law (W=of Cad D. Good. 152 Lyaaway Lyon,M 01902 791-593-2016 7. The plaintiff, New Tri -City Realty Corp., is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts having its principal office at 262 Highland Avenue, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. 8. The plaintiff, One Way Lumber, Inc., is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts having its principal office at 297 Highland Avenue, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. 9. The plaintiff, Alan Samiljan, prior to the commencement of the hearings hereinafter mentioned, filed a Petition to Intervene & Registration of Abutter. The Petition was not ruled on by the Hearing Officer, hereinafter named, until after the public hearings had been closed at which time the Hearing Officer allowed the Petition to the extent that said plaintiff was granted Participant status but denied abutter and Intervenor status. 10. Plaintiff, Young World Academy, owns and operates a children's preschool at 3 Green Ledge Street, Salem, Massachusetts. 11. Plaintiff, Hutchinson Realty, is the owner of the premises known as and numbered 331-333 Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts which premises directly abut the land owned by the City Df Salem located at 12 Swampscott Road, and on which premises there is located a health care facility. 12. All of the Plaintiffs are aggrieved persons within the meaning of G.L. Chapter 111, § 150A. 13. The defendant, Board of Health of the City of Salem (the "Salem Board of Health" or the 'Board of Health'), is a municipal department of the City of Salem, Massachusetts having its principal Dffice at 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. 14. Pursuant to a Notice of Public Hearing, the Board of Health commenced public hearings (the 'Hearings") on the Application (the "Application") for Minor Modification to a Site Assignment for lie Salem Transfer Station filed on behalf of Northside Carting, Inc. and the City of Salem ,individually and/or collectively "Northside Carting", the "City", "or the "Applicant" or `Applicants," all as the context permits) relating to the City of Salem's existing transfer station at 12 Swampscott Road in Salem. . 15. The Application requested modification of the existing Site Assignment to allow, inter alfa, For the demolition of the existing structures now located on the premises and the construction of a mew transfer station and to increase the permitted daily tonnage of solid waste handled at the site from the current permitted maximum of 100 tons per day to an average of 400 tons per day with a iaily maximum of 500 tons. The Application stated that the waste will consist of consist of construction and demolition debris, municipal solid waste and commercial solid waste. Gw Office of C®1 D. Cm0(m= 152 Ly my LyngM 01902 98b59b2016 16. The existing facility is subject to a Permit By Rule as described in a letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated June 3, 1994, a true copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit " " 17. The existing facility is permitted for processing up to 100 tons per day of refuse according to correspondence from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated September 9, 1976, a true copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit " " 18. Based upon reports filed by Northside Carting, Inc. with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, the facility processed: 22,734 tons of solid waste over 312 days for an average of 72.8 tons per day in 2004; 23,079 tons of solid waste over 312 days for an average of 73.9 tons per day in 2005; 16,125 tons of solid waste over 312 days for an average of 51.6 tons per day in 2006; 7,930 tons of solid waste over 312 days for an average of 25.4 tons per day in 2007; and 6,821 tons of solid waste over 312 days for an average of 21.8 tons per day in 2008, the last full year prior to the subject hearings. 19. The Hearings were conducted over two meetings on November 10, 2009 and November 19, 2009 ostensibly pursuant to G.L. Chapter 111 § 150A and the Public Hearing Rules set forth at 310 CMR 16.20 et seq. 20. The Hearings were conducted by Kenneth F. Whittaker, Ph.D. as a hearing officer designated by the Board of Health pursuant to the provisions of 310 CMR 16.20(3). 21. At the commencement of the public hearings on November 10, 2009, the Chairperson of the Board of Health announced that the Board of Health would not consider challenges to whether or not the Application was properly one for a "minor modification" and that any such challenges should be directed to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection ("D.E.P. "). The Hearing Officer thereafter ruled that any such challenge was not before the Board of Health. 22. During the course of the public hearings, the Board of Health and the Hearing Officer allowed the proponents to use, refer to, and submit documents without the same having been authenticated and without any foundation having been laid. 23. During the course of the hearings, the Board did not receive any sworn testimony and the Hearing Officer ruled that any questions to be posed to the proponents and their witnesses were to be posed to the Hearing Officer who would then pose questions to the witness. 24. The Hearing Officer allowed the proponents and their witnesses to speak and offer the unsworn statements without any time limitation. 25. When the Hearing Officer allowed members of the public to speak, the Hearing Officer ruled that all presentations were limited to approximately two (2) minutes. With very few L Officeef Cad D. Goodin 152 Lyom y LM MA 01902 781-593-2016 exceptions, the two minute rule was enforced, even as to elected public officials who sought to speak and query the applicants and their witnesses. 26. No questions were permitted to be asked directly of the proponents or their witnesses and as to questions that were posed through the Hearing Officer, the Hearing Officer rephrased questions and allowed the proponents' own experts' responses to be interrupted and completed by other representatives of the Applicants. 27. At the close of the second hearing on November 24, 2010, the Board of Health ruled that the public hearing portion of the proceeding was closed except that it would accept further written comments for a period of two (2) weeks. 28. Subsequent to the close of the public hearings, the Hearing Officer wrongfully denied the Petition of Alan Samiljan to register as an abutter and Intervenor. 29. The Board met on December 15, 2009 to conduct its deliberations at which time it voted to approve the Application. During the public deliberation session the Board of Health engaged in substantive discussions with the co -Applicant, Northside Carting, but did not permit other interested parties or members of the public to participate. Despite the vote to approve the Application, the Board continued the matter for further consideration of "conditions" to be imposed on the modified Site Assignment. 30. Ultimately the Board adopted conditions and published notice (the "Notice of Decision") of its decision in The Salem News on February 16, 2010. 31. The published Notice of Decision did not conform to the requirements of 310 CMR 16.20(13)(c). 32. Either the Decision was not rendered within 45 days of the initial date of the public hearing or the Notice of Decision was not published within the time required by 310 CMR 16.20(10)(k)(1). 33. The Decision fails, on its face, to satisfy the requirements of the regulations relative thereto. 34. The Decision does not comply with the requirements of 310 CMR 16.20(10)(k)(4) as it contains no determinations of fact as to site suitability criteria. 35. The Decision authorizes a major modification of the Site Assignment in violation of 310 CMR 16.22(2). 36. The Decision authorizes a modification to a Site Assignment despite the existence of an occupied residential dwelling and a health care facility within 500 feet of waste handling areas in violation of 310 CMR 16.40 (3)(d)5.b. 37. The Decision authorizes a modification to a Site Assignment despite traffic impacts from the facility operation constitute a danger to the public health, safety, and environment due to traffic congestion, pedestrian and vehicular safety, road configurations, alternate routes, and vehicle emissions. Further, the Certificate of the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs on the Environmental Notification Form filed by or on behalf of the Applicants determined that the project did not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in part because the "proponents have committed to the following measures to avoid and minimize air quality impacts associated with diesel emissions ... Limiting hours of operation during commuting hours to reduce emissions during peak non -transfer station traffic..." The Board of Health did not impose any condition limiting the hours of operation to reduce emissions by during peak traffic hours. 38. The Decision was based upon unsubstantiated traffic projections that were based upon false existing conditions data supplied by the Applicants. 39. The decision is based upon unsubstantiated air quality and noise reports that failed to take into account critical factors and were based upon speculation and unsound assumptions. 40. The hearings before the Board of Health were otherwise contrary to the Public Hearing Rules appearing at 310 CMR 16.20 et seq. 41. The proceedings by the Board of Health were contrary to the applicable statutes, rules and regulations; and the Decision is in excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the Board of Health, is based upon an error of law, made upon unlawful procedure, unsupported by substantial evidence, and arbitrary or capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance with law. 42. The conduct of the public hearings were deprived the public, including the plaintiffs, from any meaningful participation and thereby deprived the plaintiffs of due process of law. 43. The Board of Health rendered its Decision based upon political considerations and abrogated its duty to preserve and protect the public health. WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs pray that this Honorable Court: 1. Vacate the Decision of the Salem Board of Health voted on December 15, 2009 and subject to conditions thereafter attached as being contrary to the requirements and provisions of G.L. Chapter 111, §151A, the Public Hearing Rules appearing at 310 CMR 16.20, and the Site Criteria set forth at 310 CMR 16.40 et seq., and other applicable law. 2. Plaintiffs' costs of suit. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just. Lew Off.. d Carl D. Goode 152 Lym y Ly MA 01902 781-593-2016 Dated: March 26, 2010 L DfE.d Cad D. Gwdm 152 Ly y Ly MA 01902 781-593-2016 Respectfully submitted, The Plaintiffs By their attorneys: CARL D. GOobl AN Goodman Law Offices 152 Lynnway, Suite IE Lynn, MA 01902 Tel: (781) 593-2016 Fax: (781) 592-1129 BBO No. 201720 Email: carl@attorneygoodman.com William F. Weld oa.n,o< Trudy S core Ta. twit Thaw a. Fors ACOV Cwvakelmw Commonwealth of Massachusetts —L..,„ Executive office of Environmental Affairs li �O Department of P Environmental Protection Metro BostoryNortheost Regional Office City of Salem, DPW One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attention: Charles F. Quigley Dear Mr. Quigley: V 01.1 G 1994 CITY OF SALEM HEALTH DEPT. JUU 03 S RE: SALEM - Solid Waste Transfer Station Permit by Rule Transmittal No.: 79384 Permit No.: NESW-TS-038 Facility ID No.: TR0258.004 The Metropolitan.. Boston/Northeast Region, Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Solid Waste Management, ("the Department") has received your Application BWP SW 34 Permit by Rule for,. the existing City of Salem Transfer Station, located at Swampscott Road in Salem,. Massachusetts. On January 21, 1994, the Department issued a technical deficiency letter relative to the City of Salem's application, because the City had not provided proof that the transfer station had been site assignment. On April 25, 1994, the Department received copies of minutes from a Board of Healthmeeting regarding the site assignment (June 9 1 196.0) for a incinerator on Swampscott Road. This material was sent by Joanne Scott, Health Agent for Salem. The City of Salem Transfer Station has been previously approved by the Department on September 9, 1975 to;receive up to 100 tons per day of refuse. The facility has not been approved to receive any Special Waste. The Department has determined that the Permit by Rule Application fulfills the conditions of 310 CMR 19.023(3) and that the City of Salem facility is in compliance with the requirements of 310 CMR 19.200 et seq., Transfer Station Design and Operations Standards. For the reasons noted above, the Department hereby approves your application for a Permit by Rule for the City of Salem Transfer Station subject: to the following conditions:. 1. Periodic examination of the transfer station site shall be conducted by a representative of City of Salem, or their consultant, experienced in solid waste activities. This examination shall include a check_ of the area for the presence of any odors or other nuisances. If odors 10 Commerce Way 0 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 • FAX(617)935-6393 • Telephone (617) 935-2160 City of Salem Permit by Rule page 2 or other nuisances are present, it shall be immediately reported to the Board of Health and appropriate steps shall immediately be taken by City of Salem to abate the nuisance condition(s). 2. The City of Salem shall submit an annual report summarizing the facility's operations for the previous calendar year to the Department's Northeast Regional Office, not later than February 15th of each calendar year. The annual report shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: a. A summary of the year's receipt of wastes, including the type and tonnage of waste received. b. An evaluation of the facility's recycling program, if any, for the prior year describing the rates of recycling achieved, a breakdown by material type, and a description of how materials were marketed. C. A summary of any operational problems or deficiencies encountered during the year, including odors or other nuisances, and including recommendations for changes or modifications to address the problem(s). d. A summary of any loads rejected by the facility, or returned to the facility following rejection by the disposal facility. 3. The, facility shall .be operated and maintained in compliance with the applicable parts of 310 CMR 19.000, in particular 310 CMR 19.007 through 19.011 (rights of the Department, submittals, records, monitoring and supervision), 19.043 ("Conditions for Permits and Authorizations") and 19.200 et seq ("Part III: Transfer Station Design and Operations Standards"). 4. The facility shall not accept any Special Waste except in compliance with an approval issued by the Department, in writing,.pursuant to 310 CMR 19.061, Special Waste. 5. In the event .any load of waste is rejected by the City of Salem Transfer Station, or is returned to the City of Salem Transfer Station, because it contains infectious waste or asbestos, the operator shall notify the Department's Division of Solid Waste Management, Northeast Regional Office within two (2) hours by FAX. If a FAX machine is not available, this notification may City of Salem Permit by Rule page 3 be made by phone instead within two (2) hours. Such notification by phone shall be followed up by a certified letter within 24 hours. This notice (and follow-up letter where applicable) shall provide to the Department the following information: a. origin of :load, b. description of load, C. reason for rejection, d. name of hauler and license plate number of the vehicle involved. Pursuant to M,G.L.c.,Ill, section 150A and 310 CMR 19.023, the approval for this facility issued September 9, 1975) to C.E. Maguire, Inc. as amended by this approval, shall constitute a Permit and Authorization to operate (ATO) the City of Salem Transfer Station located -at Swampscott Road, Salem,MA. NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The City of Salem (.City) is hereby notified that it may within twenty-one (21) days file a request that this decision be deemed a provisional decision under 310 CMR 19.037 (4) (a), by submitting a written statement of the basis on which the City believes it is aggrieved, together with any supporting materials. Upon timely filing of such a request, the decision shall be deemed a provisional decision with an effective date twenty-one (.21) days after the Department's receipt of the request. Such a request shall reopen the administrative record, and the Department may rescind, supplement, modify, or reaffirm its decision. Failure by the City to exercise the right provided in this section shall constitute a waiver of the City's right to appeal. Appeal. Any person aggrieved by the issuance of this permit, except as provided for under 310 CMR 19.037(4)(b), may file an appeal for judicial review of said decision in accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. e. 111, s. 150A, and M.G.L. C. 30A, not later than thirty. (30) days following the receipt of the final permit. The standing of a person to file an appeal and the procedures for filing such appeal shall be governed by the provisions of M:G.L. c. 30A. Unless the person requesting an appeal requests and is granted a stay of the terms and conditions of the permit by a court of competent jurisdiction, the permit decision shall remain effective. City of Salem Permit by Rule. page 4 Notice of Action. Any aggrieved person intending to appeal the grant of this permit to the Superior Court shall first provide notice to the Department of their intention to commence such action. Said notice of intention shall include the Department file number and shall identify with particularity the issues and reasons why it is believed the permit decision was not proper. Such notice shall be provided to the Office of General Counsel of the Department and the Regional Director for the regional office which processed the permit application. The appropriate addresses to Which to send such notices are: General Counsel Department of Environmental Protection One Winter Street - 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02108 Regional Director Department of Environmental Protection 10 Commerce Way Woburn, MA 01801 No allegation shall be made in any judicial appeal of this permit decision unless the matter complained of was raised at the appropriate point in the administrative review procedures established in those regulations, provided that a matter may be raised.upon a showing that it is material and that it was not reasonably possible with due diligence to have been raised during such procedures or that matter sought to be raised is of critical importance to the environmental impact of the permitted activity. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Robert Tanzer at the letterhead address or at (617) 935-2160. Si cere'��J` Robert Tanze Environmental Engineer TDM/RT/pdb cc: DEP/DSWM/Boston - Attn: DEP/NERD - Attn: Kevin Salem Board of Health Richard Lis, Assistant SW\SALEM.PBR Thomas D. Mahin Chief, Solid Waste Section Bureau of Waste Prevention Phil Weinberg, Acting Director Mahoney City Engineer 0Bparimgnt nY 1��tirdt`"usntdl tptality inqinaering Division of rnVirajMotltal Ilealth September 91 1975 CIE. Siagu Jra, fSn1e� cemt,Emtion rngineoring, Ina# trr Solid Wastes , %l Canal Strut . plan AbAiloyal for Transfer PrOyidfk"Ca. Rhode Ignd 0g$o9 9tatiot► AAtentiont John D, pi11o1urry Aenflamon, The Department of gnufrnnarental Uccaiity 5itniuAof�inuu ire rnx`•nnttc to sour risgctrs ,, has rnvicnted a sot af'• plans for AD �treotian of a hmso tttmnsfor statico on thR site of•hint oxisting Was) Ine(nnt%tor located Off CwemScott poad in tho City of 5eitnn. • 71rQ ahadts, tha firfit of which Iii f iiladc purrs cotrsist of twelve (12) city of 961em. flastaehusetts Nunioipal SR11d Nast* Transfdr station Pdrtinn of t11 is4lflg ttettdled 6y tp o of two trailers. Find) dismi Ina, sanitary landfills O'Ke Haguim, Ind, Oatat April 1070 A rrUfUse 'transfdr or banding. the in 1tnowb i. a services, that The Olanrtwttfivi w V. ro�,m�roree�t Ii� +tlity Engineers is of the opinion ritttihonginQeringiprat i osdAndjp4�hynapdrVQdsantdeh4"�� a describcdipidns SOjeot to tho follWj"O Conditions: 14 This brprovAl is limited to the handlino of 100 Mona r 'Ip day of rafuse. 21 axjsting undoEill rad ash and refuse shall be govared with inches t hiso ht f im�p�Wous materiel the top four �d) IIah10 of supporting yogdtatidn. 9, 'this affioe shAll he aOntaotod after completion of this proiret to tnet 4n inspection of the faoility can Ito mads, f� W frac SON d Solid Woo - Plan ApprOVAI for rransfor station R. Operational regards shall be kept of the iota, weights of refoso MOM at this faoilify, no oAanes shell do made in these Marta without to Witten dpproYa of the uepnrtftnt Of knviranr M41 Quality Snginearing.- Etc; onvi"Jontal assatsm�enh form to rAquired to bo snbnittad for this prolkil since t is, exampt under the, htsviraraaental .f�rotaotian Riegalations $f the lxMtivs Offioe Of t:nvirMmantal Affairs; and the project has there- fora Gaon dQttrmimad to oanse no significant damage %0 the enVirgiwmnto A eopynOf whi h est boakept on the site used or qonsCrua i tile plans, purpnseg. Very truly Y041%, Per the Comissioner, Kenneth -A. Tarda,] Regional_sanitnry Snoiriear KATlstgl/km Ook $410 Health Capatfaent „..._ Y I J 7 IT Conditions of Approval Forthe Minor Modification to the Site Assignment = '= BK.. Y The Salem Board of Health Based on all of the evidence given at a public hearing conducted pursuant to the Massachusetts Site Assignment Regulations for Solid Waste Facilities (3 10 CMR 16.00), the Board of Health finds that the proposed minor modification to the existing site assignment of the facility located at 12 Swampscott Road will not constitute a danger to public health, safety or the environment and hereby approves such minor n iodification subject to the following conditions. These Conditions shall be strictly enforced, and violations of them shall be grounds for the impositions of fines, temporary shut downs, or rescission of this site assignment and closure of the facility. 1. With the exception of the residential drop-off area, the Facility shall be completely enclosed with all transfer operations occurring within the building enclosure. 2. Hours of operation shall be between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday and 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM on Saturday for Commercial users and 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM on Saturday for residential users, excluding the holidays noted in NCI's existing lease with the City of Salem. The residential drop off facility shall be open to the public during all operating hours. 3. The Facility shall accept a maximum annual tonnage of 124,800 tons/year of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Commercial Solid Wastes (CSW) and Construction Demolition Debris (C&D), with a daily average of 400 tons/day and a maximum of 500 tonstday. The maximum number of vehicles entering the transfer station facility (not including residential vehicles access to the leaf and yard waste and recyclables drop off facility) on any one given day shall not exceed 115. 4. The Facility Operator shall employ a sufficient number of employees to properly monitor the operations and conduct load inspections in conformity with the applicable local, state and federal regulations. 5. The Facility Operator shall maintain a valid 24 hour -7 day per week emergency phone number conspicuously displayed at the Facility for emergency conditions during both operating and non- operating hours, posted in both English and Spanish. 6. The Facility Operator shall conduct daily street sweeping of all paved surfaces on4he site. 7. The Facility Operator shall conduct routine litter control/policing and street sweeping along Swampscott Road from the intersection of Highland Ave to First Street, as necessary, and at a minimum semi-monthly. 8. The Facility Operator shall develop and provide the Salem Board of Health an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Manual for the Facility prior to commencement of operations that incorporates all of the Site Assignment conditions and is in accordance with the applicable local, state and federal requirements. Page 1 of 6 9. The Facility Operator shall develop and provide the Salem Board of Health an Emergency Response Plan prior to commencement of operations that addresses the following emergencies and describes the response actions to be taken in each situation: a. Fire protection b. Loss of electricity c. Equipment failure d. Reportable releases per the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (21E Regulations) e. Vehicular accidents related to access into and/or egress from the Facility 10. The Facility shall notify the Salem Board of Health and the Department of Environmental Protection of any emergency event within 24 hours of the event and provide a follow-up written report within 14 calendar days of the event. 11. The Facility shall include high speed transfer doors which shall be closed at all times except when transfer vehicles are entering or exiting the building. 12. The visual, physical and structural condition of the Facility and grounds shall be maintained in good condition at all times. The Facility Operator shall submit a landscaping plan to the Salem Board of Health for review and approval and shall complete the landscaping plantings prior to facility startup 13. The Facility Operator shall be required to promptly repair any significant building damage that compromises the performance or ability of the Facility to contain fugitive dust, noise or odors and provide a follow-up written report within 14 calendar days of the event. 14. The Facility Operator shall post ,Anti -Idling signs and periodically monitor and control the idling times of all diesel vehicles entering, exiting, or queuing. on site at any time in conformance with the applicable local, state or federal regulations, specifically 310 CMR 7.11. 15. Except for the occasional one business day storage of one C&D Debris covered container, and the leaf yard waste and recyclables drop off facility, no waste may be handled or stored outside the enclosed receiving Facility. 16. Vehicular traffic entering or exiting the Facility shall be controlled to prevent the queuing of vehicles beyond, or outside the "fence line" of the Facility. Vehicles will not be allowed to queue on any City streets, including Swampscott Road. 17. On-site vehicles owned, operated and otherwise controlled by the Facility Operator, which may include but not be limited to, rolling on-site equipment, shall be retrofitted with after -market emission control kits that will further reduce vehicle emissions. Any new vehicles acquired for use at the site will be equipped with emissions controls that meet all current state and federal emissions requirements. 18. Transfer trucks owned, operated and otherwise controlled by the Facility Operator, which may include but not be limited to the trucks transferring consolidated waste materials off site, shall be retrofitted with after -market emission control kits that will further reduce vehicle emissions. Any new vehicles acquired for use at the site will be equipped with emissions controls that meet all current state and federal emissions requirements. 19. All on -road vehicles, packers and dump trailers shall use only ultra low sulfur diesel fuel. Page 2 of 6 20. The Facility Operator shall post signs stating that the Salem Board of Health prohibits the use of engine compression brakes by any trucks utilizing the Facility within one mile of the Facility. If repeated violations are brought to the attention of the Facility Operator by the City, such violators will be prohibited by Facility Operator from future use of the Facility. 21. Any storm water controls, permits or pollution prevention plans at the Facility shall be in strict conformity with local, state and federal storm water requirements. 22. The Facility shall maintain a minimum of three spill containment kits on site at all times to contain any spill of fuels, oils or hydraulic fluids from a vehicle whether inside or outside the Facility 23. The Facility shall fund an independent qualified consultant selected and managed by the Salem Board of Health to commence a noise evaluation within 180 days of start-up of the Facility. The noise evaluation study must be submitted to the Salem Board of Health within 240 days of startup of the Facility. The noise evaluation shall demonstrate that increased noise levels at up to three sensitive receptors are at or below a 5 dBA increase above background levels. If dBA levels exceed a 5 dBA increase, the Facility shall install noise attenuation features to reduce the increase to below a 5 dBA increase within 330 days of startup of the Facility. The study shall include baseline and noise monitoring measurements at up to three locations, closest to sensitive receptors. Every attempt should be made to conduct the updated baseline and source compliance testing within as close a period of time as practicable. These nearest residential receptors would include Locations E, F, G, and/or H used in the original sound study conducted in 2008. Sound testing will be 1 -hour in duration at each location. The sound level metric used for the comparison will be the L90 as defined in the MA DEP Noise Policy 90-001. If the testing shows that background sound levels are lower than those in the 2008 study, then compliance will be deemed to be achieved if the "Project -only" sound levels are no higher than those modeled in Table 5 of the March 21, 2008 sound study report as long the Noise Policy is still achieved. The cost for such study shall not exceed $7,500. 24. All free draining liquids within the Facility shall be collected and stored within an on site water "tight tank", which is to be permitted through the Salem Board of Health and approved by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. 25. Prior to commencement of operations, the Facility must contract with a Massachusetts licensed Professional pest control management firm and provide the Salem Board of Health with a copy of the executed contract.. The contracted services shall include, but not be limited to, inspecting the site for vermin such as birds, rats, and insects on a semi-monthly basis, (24 times per year) and the findings presented in a written report, which shall be forwarded to the Salem Board of Health. Appropriate and timely mitigation measures shall be undertaken in the event vermin are identified at the Facility. . 26. The Facility shall have an air handling system capable of handling general air exchanges within the Facility, as required by the Massachusetts Building Code for ventilation and for control of odors generated within the Facility. The system shall have the capability of being operated at less than full capacity, as may be required, in the event that odors become an issue during non -working hours. The air handling system shall be capable of creating a negative pressure within the enclosed building during periods of operation. Negative pressure will be considered to be adequate when the Page 3 of 6 air handling systems are functioning normally during operational hours. The Salem Board of Health shall be notified within 48 hours of any system malfunction. The Facility operator shall notify the Board in writing if the misting system ventilation system or any tipping floor door is out of service for more than 24 hours. Such notice shall be delivered to the Board the same day as such event and shall include the reason for the equipment being out of service, the repairs required and the expected time to put the equipment back in service. In such event, the Facility Operator shall promptly place such equipment back into service and at a minimum comply with the following additional conditions: Doors: The Facility Operator shall keep out of service doors closed until repaired; Ventilation Svstem: The Facility Operator shall increase the flow through the misting system during Periods when the ventilation system is out of service. The Facility Operator shall put the ventilation system back in service within 36 hours of the notice to the Board. If the ventilation system is not put back in service within 36 hours all incoming waste shall be suspended until the ventilation system is back in service. Misting Svstem: The Facility Operator shall use other methods of watering down the waste such as hand held hoses when the misting system is out of service. The Facility Operator shall put the misting system back in service within 36 hours of the notice to the Board. If the misting system is not put back in service within 36 hours all incoming waste shall be suspended until the misting system is back in service. 27. The Facility air handling system(s) shall be operated in such a manner as to render the Facility in confomrity with all applicable local, state and federal requirements. 28. The Facility shall employ odor neutralizing agents in the misting system to effectively neutralize any odors exiting the building. . 29. The Facility shall fund an independent qualified consultant selected and managed by the Salem Board of Health to submit a protocol for emission testing of the proposed stack to the Salem Board of Health within 120 days of Facility start up to measure emissions of fine (PMZs) and coarse (PMme) particulate matter using USEPA approved methods. The actual stack emission test shall be conducted by the independent qualified consultant not later than 180 days after Facility start up. A written report of the emissions testing results shall be submitted by independent qualified consultant to the Board not later than 210 days after the Facility start up. If the report does not demonstrate that the actual stack emissions (lb/hr) multiplied by the maximum hours of operation are not less than one ton per year, then within 30 days apply to the MassDEP for an Air Plan Approval, including a Best Available Control Technology (BACT) analysis and air dispersion modeling to demonstrate compliance with all applicable air quality standards. The application and Air Plan Approval shall be copied to the Salem Board of Health. The study shall include stack emissions testing during active transfer station operations with the ventilation system in normal operation. The cost for such stack testing shall not exceed $ 7,500. 30. Any waste materials delivered to the Facility and tipped on the receiving floor of the Facility that are hazardous in nature shall be removed from the waste mass and stored in a secure container designed to handle such hazardous materials. The containers for hazardous materials shall be stored within the secure enclosure of the Facility. Page 4 of 6 31. All vehicles containing waste that enter or exit the Facility must be covered with a canvas, tarpaulin or other equivalent method to prevent waste from blowing or falling off the vehicles. All empty departing vehicles that delivered waste to the Facility must not allow residual waste materials from becoming a nuisance condition. All potentially odiferous materials shall be delivered in sealed containers. 32. The exterior of all waste vehicles, whether delivering or transporting waste from the Facility, shall be kept clean and free of litter and debris. 33. The truck route for all (100%) of the consolidated waste materials leaving the Facility shall exit out onto Swampscott Road utilizing the southernmost facility exit. No Facility Operator controlled/owned vehicles shall use First Street, unless collecting curbside trash and recyclable items. 34. Closing documents for the Residential property at One DiPietro Avenue, demonstrating that the Facility Operator has purchased and recorded said purchase at the registry of deeds shall be submitted to the Board prior to Facility start up. The deed shall note that for as long as the transfer station is in existence and operational that the property shall never be used as an occupied residential dwelling, a licensed day care center, prison, health care facility, elementary school, middle school or high school, children's preschool, or senior center or youth center, excluding equipment storage or maintenance structures. 35. An authorized representative of the City of Salem Board of Health shall have the right to perform unscheduled inspections of the Facility during operating hours or at any other time deemed appropriate by the Salem Board of Health for the purposes of confirming compliance with the final approved conditions. 36. All correspondence submitted to the MassDEP shall be copied to the Salem Board of Health, including but not limited to: reports, correspondence, records, notices, contracts, agreements, permit modifications, and change in operators/ownership 37. The Facility Operator shall provide an independent assessment of the traffic generation trips within six months of the Facility being fully operational. The independent monitoring program shall count the site generated traffic for at least three days for comparison with the projections discussed at the November 24, 2009 continuance of the public hearing. If the operation rates are higher than projected, the independent assessment shall provide an assessment of the traffic impacts and recommend additional mitigation measures to the Salem BOH. 38. Traffic improvements recommended on Pages 28-30 of the December 2007 Traffic Impact and Assessment Study by Vanasse & Associates Inc. is herein incorporated as a condition of this site assignment. These conditions generally include: a.) traffic signal retiming and lane use re -striping; b.) re -timing of the study area signalized intersections as an improvement measure to optimize traffic signal operations; c.) pavement marking modifications at the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland Ave; d) other operational improvements that may be warranted The Salem Board of health recognizes that these improvements are subject to the approval of the Massachusetts DOT. All correspondence with MDOT regarding these improvements shall be submitted to the Salem Board of Health. Page 5 of 6 neo ,i cu,u a:arrn rnr LHSeKJtI rax / _ P. 1 39. The FinaUity Operator shall pay the actual expenses up to $20,000 per year (ousted annually on the anniversary of this agreement. by the Brockton Boston Nashua CPI_ -U) into a revolving Nod controlled by the Board to hire a qualified environmental scientist or engineer to inspect the constraclion and Operations -at the facility, to review the records of operation and to evaluate compliance. with local state and federal laws and rVdetions and with the terms and conditions of all environmental permits inclusive of this site assignment. The scientist or engineer inay take messwements of ambient air' at the property line foi the purpose of determining compliance with the allowable ambient levels to particulate matter known as PMxs and PMm, noise levels at sensitive receptors, tmfffc colmts or other measurements as deemed appropriate. The City will provide the Facility Operator with copies of all results of such inspections and maannmeats within tint (10) business days of receipt. 40. The Facility Operator allU shady the First Street and Swampscott Road Intersection to daemnine if a traffic signal is warranted. The study sW also examine the lights at Traders Way and MgNand. Ave. The Facility Operator shall fund an Independent qualified cor>seltant selected and managed by the Salem Board of Health to peer review the study. If the traf&c atgnal is warranted at the First Street and Swampscott Road then the Facility Operator shall design, and permit the new signals and also fund up to 5200.000 to *Dnsuuctthe new signals 41. The conAUOns of this permit see binding on the Facility Operator, and army of its heirs, successors, assigns. agents or employees. 42. The Facility Operator shell comply with the United States Department of Transportation negt mnonts governing samenmg of truck drivers and check the driving records and potomm mndom drug testing on the Facility Operators waste haulers 43. Northside Carting will provide a drop off container for redeemable bottles and esus at the transfer - station. Nor"do Catting. will redeem them and an fimds generated will be donated to the Salam Public Schools on a monthly basis. L -di- Z.o/D Page 6 of 6