10 BEACON STREET - BUILDING JACKET 10 BEACON ST .
P
rSuper aba
Oversized-Tab Folders
90%Larger Label Area
//A I SMEA61
KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED
No. 10301
PATENTPENDINO
SUSTAIINyABLE MICI16 TN.RECYCLEDiOR
y INI7IATI
VE
c. oarenswRma POSTCONSUMER®
rmw..Ryrvpnmore
e1i011N
MADE IN USA
GET ORGANIZED AT SMEAD.COM
?3atcrb of �pp, ori NDt .: 2
OCTOBER 17, 1979 . CITY "" `` UFF ICE
SALEM. MASS.
NOVEMBER 14, 1979
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NATALIE GAINES CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10 BEACON
STREET IN A R-2 DISTRICT.
A hearing on this petition was held on October 17, 1979 with the following Board
Members present: James Boulger, Jr. , Chairman; Atty. Anthony Feeherry; Douglas
Hopper; John Nutting; Joseph Piemonte; and Edward Luzinski. Notice of the hearing
was published in the Salem Evening News on October 3rd and 10th, 1979 in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. At the request of the Board the
hearing was postponed until November 14, 1979 to enable the petitioner to get
accurate drawn plans. The following Board members were present at the hearing on
November 14, 1979: James Bougler, Jr. , Chairman; Douglas Hopper; John Nutting;
Joseph Piemonte and Edward Luzinski.
The petitioner is requesting a variance to extend an existing rear porch which
is within 2 feet of the rear property line and would be 20 feet long. The petitioner
represented herself before the Board and stated that the closest building to the
porch is a garage on the property in back of her house. She stated that her rear
yard is s.o small it is useless and this porch, which will have no walls or roof,
and is really a sundeck, will improve her property and eliminate a problem. There
was no opposition.
In discussion members of the Board felt that there was a hardship unique to the
particular property due to the location of the house, however the size of the
proposed porch was not justified, and that the proposed size would require a variarca
for the rear yard in addition to the side yard.
The Board voted unanimously to grant a variance for an uncovered porch at the rear
of the house with a rear yard setback of 2111" as shown on submitted drawings, but
not to include any variance for the side yard. A '10' set back is required at, the side
yard as per the Zoning Ordinance. The Board found that it could grant the variance
without substanially derogating from the intent of the Salem Zoning Ordinance.
VARIANCE GRANTED
;AP?EAL MOM. THIS 0: UP T r•:1 SHALL S- . A E PURSUANT TO SECTM 17 OF THE frASS.
GENERAL LAMS, CHA!+i_; SU , A'iU ST'AL'L CE 1:4tY`T:+1'{ SO 07YS WIER THE DATE OF FILING
OF TI NIS !;=Go:Ctr L`i THE G:F:J_ CF THE CITY CLER:i. - . .
pF9
P' f'!i A. ;S . ._ �+ c: .'.S. .�.•1' '.:: .:'.F 9:i.^.:7-_r .. .?' _
}iT
,OL A G r .F f '.' . ��'.
1H n ' rc J > FA VE 4 E' r _O.
,,- N ".e :.F TdE L";:YER Dougl Hopper
OF n�:ORJ Uk IS RcCUROtJ A:10 PoOicO C,r P{_ .ERS CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. Actin' Secretary
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY.OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
LAW OFFICES OF
JOSEPH DAVID CASEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JOSEPH DAVID CASEY SUITE 201
PAMELA CASEY 0'6RIEN
CHRISTOPHER T.CASEY
140 UNION STREET
LYNN. MASSACHUSETTS 01901
TELEPHONE 617 / 595-2466
June 15, 1994
Miss Victoria Kordalski
8 Beacon Street
Salem, Massachusetts 01970
Dear Madam:
You are hereby officially notified of the following:
Ms. Gaines of 1'0'Beacon Street iritbnds to erect a fence on.her property according to the
rules and regulations of the City of Salem, Building Inspector.
If at any time you damage, destruct, alter or deface same in any way, you will be subject
to prosecution.
Very truly yours,
LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH DAVID CASEY
By:
Christopher T. Casey
CTC/rmn