Loading...
83 BAY VIEW AVENUE - BUILDING JACKET v 0e") � sup rlTb. l!! S M EAe KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED Na. 10341 vA►ai ONO � cmwim tw P GETMA IMIATWA-COM ` /:C,4��w1 i• v� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS et�t i � nt i BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET 1 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 KIMBERLEYDRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 1115 JUN 2q P 3; 51 MAYOR FILE fl June 29. 2015 Decision 04TY CL K. SALEM.MASS. City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of LINDA ST. PIERRE, seeking a Special Permit requesting relief from Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single- and Toro-Family Residential Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter or structurally change a non-conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch located at the property of 83 BAY VIEW (Map 44 Lot 95)(R1 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 17, 2015 pursuant to M.G.L Ch.40A, 4 11. The hearing was closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present:Rebecca Curran (Chair),Peter A. Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos, Mike Duffy and Tom Watkins. The Petitioner seeks a Special Permit from the provisions of Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single- and Turo-Fancily Residential Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter or structurally change a non-conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch. Statements of fact: 1. In the petition date-stamped May 26, 2015, the Petitioner requested a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single- and Two-Family, Residential Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter or structurally change a non-conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch. 2. Ms. Susan St. Pierre presented the petition on behalf of the petitioner. 3. The porch is dimensionally non-conforming as the side-setback is three (3) feet away from the side- yard lot tine. In accordance with the Salem Zoning Ordinance, any porch that was constructed before 1965 can be enclosed by tight provided that the porch is a minimum of five (5) feet from any side or rear lot line. 4. The petitioner proposes to enclose a 12 foot long section of an existing side porch. 5. The footprint of the porch is not proposed to change. 6. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the petitioner to alter or structurally change a non- conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch. 7. At the public hearing, no (0) member of the public spoke in support and no (0) members spoke in opposition to the petition. A petition of support with numerous abutters was presented to the Board for the record.. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after„thoA° ftt �1` . of the petipgn�, flu £g e., ag cation narrative and plans, makes the following findings: ' ,AAE ? JFalis f1f1w t= 1a City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2015 Project: 83 Bay View Avenue Page 2 of 2 Findings for Special Permit: 1. The proposed change or extension of a non-conforming structure would not be more substantially detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the impact on the social, economic or community needs served by the proposal. 2. There are no impacts on traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading. 3. The capacity of the utilities is not affected by the project. 4. There are no impacts on the natural environment,including drainage. 5. The proposal conforms to the existing neighborhood character. 6. The potential fiscal impact,including impact on the City tax base is positive. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter A. Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos, Mike Duffy and Tom Watkins) and none (0) opposed,to approve the requested Special Permit to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: Standard: 1. Petitioner shall comply with allcity and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board. • Rebecca air Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal fram this decxaon,if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of fi ft of this decision in the office of the City Clerk, pursuant to the Massaebuseas General Laws Cbapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a ropy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk bar been filed with the Essex South RegislryofDeedi. This notice posted on "Off "al Smile i Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. or 1 0191 ata:Sp in accord arc !WG Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. July 26, 1975 MEMO TO: Attorney Richard Stafford RE: 63 Bayview Avenue Assistant City Solicitor Salem, Massachusette 01970 At approximately 9:30 A.M. on July 25, 1973 William Munroe and I went to 93 Bayview Avenue. A "Russ Yiecewicz" responded to our knock. He informed us two (2) men were living there... Torn Stevens, the OTanar, and [carry Fraser. We were told any other information would have to code from Mr. Stevens who was at work. (Salem fire Department) Shortly after arriving back at the Office I received a call from Por. Stevens wanting to know what the building Inspector was doing at his house. I informed him we were there at the request of the City Solicitor as a follow-up to a continuing complaint. While we were at the premises I observed a motorcycle with the license No. &K3650. To date 2 have not verified the ownersh0p or address to which this vehicle is registered. DANIEL F. MANSUR Assistant Building Inspector DFM/tlr �[.lG70'LCC1-l'�i /'/Yf(/IIq/L.� •/".1�1,(Y// BUILDINC D EjWTumkaa§trust Company Building ROBERT W. WELCH 221 Essex Street • Salem,Massachusetts 01970 - - WILLIAM J. LUNDREGAN 617-7440637 DANIEL W. RIORDAN y JANE T. LUNDREGAN {{R `3 3 (�)b FM 7 J. PATRICK BURKE VVi. J WILLIAM B. WELCH j1929-1W5) ROBERT G MCCANN RCC E ED CITY OF SALD1, SASS. July 7, 1978 Mr. William Tinti City Solicitor 70 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 a Dear Mr. Tinti: This is to''advise you that F represent Ms. Katherine Fallon, ' t+l 87 Bay View Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts 01970. ; I In the Spring of 1917, 1 had correspondence with your assistant, Mr. Peter R. Merry and the Building Inspector of the _ y; City of Salem, '.relative to enforcing the City . of Salem zoning , ordinance with respect to 83 Bay View Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, a residence owned by Mr. and Mrs. Paul Box, 82 "rt Bay View Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts and used by them in .« violation of the City of Salem zoning ordinance. i4 In May of 1977 , I thought that this matter has been amicably resolved-between the parties. However, the problem has increased and not abated. Accordingly, it is now my request that the ' City of Salem proceed against Mr. and Mrs. Paul Box for violation ` of the City of Salem zoning ordinance, r+ If you have any questions with reference to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me; k.SN Very truly y rs s° Willi J. Lundregan h+` WJL/lkp VU Rif,tfYt d Hqult a3f,ill �� 7i 4. BUILDMG DEPT WILLIAM J. TINTi - C -I'Y Q� $J{LF RICHARD W. STAFFORD CITY SOLICITOR !{ 1{y� 9 $SAF SALEMusETts ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR 70 WASHINGTON STREET JUL 43 3 40 FM _ � 70 WASHINGTON STREET 0. SALEM. MA 01970 - SALEM, MA 01570 744-2172 RECEIVED 7ad E17Y CITY OF SALEM,MASS. July 13, 1978 William J. Lundregan, Esquire Law offices of William B. Welch 221 Essex Street , Salem, Mdssachusetts 01970 bear Bill: Thank you for your letter on Kathy Fallon. Zn order for the formal procedure to start, we need a Complaint made ditectly to Jack Powers, Zoning Enforcement officer. I . As soon as you have sent the letter , we will take some action. Yours sincerely, William J. Tinti City Solicitor WJT/dlg> r Enclosute x. �z Naumkeag Trust Company BUilding ROBERT W. WELCH 221 Essex Street • Salem;Massachusetts 01870 r WILLIAM J. LUNDREGAN 617-744-0637 - DANIEL W. RIORDAN JANE T. LUNDREGAN J. PATRICK BURKE WILLIAM a. WELCH(1929-1975) ROBERT C. McCANN - ) July 17, 1978 William J. Tinti, City Solicitor 70 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE : Kathy Fallon Dear Bill : 1 have received your correspondence of July 13, 1978. Please firld enclosed copies of correspondence between myself, the Building Inspector, Peter Merry, and James Flemming. As you will note, complaints were made to the Building Inspector with an additional request of the City Solicitor back in February of 1977. This has been a continuing problem and it would appear that there is no necessity to recomplain to the Building Inspector. However, if you wish me to start the process all over again, I would be more than happy to. For your convenience, I have enclosed a sample application for a criminal complaint. If you have any questions with reference to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very ttru�lyy yburs , r William J. Lundregan WJL/lkp enclosures I�el'yh'ai 4: A JAMES M. F'LEMING ATTORNEY AT t—AW Si WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-3404 May 26, 1977 Mr, and Mrs. Paul Box 82 BayView Avenue Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Box: I have had several discussions with Attorney William J. Lundregan and Attorney Peter R. Merry concerning the alleged violations of the Salem Zoning Ordnance at 83 BayView Avenue, Salem. I have also discussed a possible solution of this pro- plem with Mr .. Pecevich, Mr. Fraser and Mr. Stevens. '1 believe that all the concerned parties would be satisfied if the follow- ing conditions were met: 1. That there be no parking by your tenants or their quests in front of 87 BayView Avenue, Salem. 2. That there be no large parties and/.or congregations, etc. at 83 BayView Avenue, Salem. 3. That Miss Fallon be allowed the quiet enjoyment of her home at 87 BayView Avenue, Salem. I believe that these conditions are reasonable and are the best possible solution. Furthermore, Z have Mr. Steven's, Mr. Pecevich' s and Mr. Fraser's assurances that they will make every attempt to conform with them. If you have any questions, feel free to call me. Sincerely, James- M. - Fleming JMF/JPi cc: Attorney William J. Lundregan�/ Attorney Peter R. Merry Air. Ross Pecevich � � ls e � +,". ,` , ,. + e Miss Katherine Fallon ' Rauoa4ce-as GI 7-744-0631 WILLIAM D. WELCH (1929 1973) ROBERT W. WELCH ! WILLIAM J. LUNOREDAN DANIEL W. RIORDAN � RI JANE T. LUMOR96AN f1(fJ PAUL CUNN[Y Af4iIft /! O '�• �yy�, ' i1 April 7, 1917 Mr. Peter P. "terry �^ Assistant city Solicitor ' Fifteen Derby square i' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Peter: On behalf of Ms. Kathie gallon, 97 h View avenue, Salem, `tassachusetts, I would like to k you for the prompt and decisive attention that iven to this matter at 85 IIay ', iew Avenue in S I c in of tell you what a serious problem this was o Falio for the past year. It appears that your l e 'r. and :?rs. Paul sox of 82 nay View ).venue, Sales e watts, dated Murch 7, 1977, has had the desired ffe t least for the present time. Vs. "allon has in cated o me that it a},pears t'.1at there are only two peoplk ivi g in the house at this time. The city '.ar/6 1 h a `so done an excellent job of enforcing the pak ng o nance in this area. nceordingly, told Ms. Fallon to monitor the situation for the ne month and if there were any violations, i to record them and I would forward you this information. I would like to keep this matter open at least through Scr,tember, so that if there are any further violations, the City would be able to go to court immediately rather than start than process from the beginning. If this meets wth your approval, vould you please ,'let me know. ?gain, many thanks. ' Very truly yours, r William 7 undrean Wit/ev _24 yr-to Match 7, 1977 Mr. and Mrs. Paul Box 82 Bay View Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. 6 Mrs. Sox: This is to notify you that the City of Salem has been in- formed that more than two unrelated people are presently renting your property at 85 Bay View Avenue in Salem. Under the zoning ordinance of the City of Salem, this con- stitutes a violation which may be punishable by a fine of D $20.00 per day for every day that the violation continues. Unless the matter is rectified prior to Friday, March 18, 1977, the City of Salem will take legal action against you. Very truly yours, Peter R. Merry PRM:acd CC: Kathie Fallon William J. tundregan, Esq. Y y�aj. lE l/1 �Yf'Y} ty If 1 e , February 16,..1977 Mr. John Powers Building Inspectoe tx" City of Salem ? Salemp ,Massachusetts 01970 a14, 13car Uri Please be advised that I ,represent Ms. Kathie Fallon of 07 say View Avenue, Salem,..r=aeeachusetts. ts. Fallon has informed"me that she has corresponded al with' you recently mirth, reference to the promises located at aI SS: Bay,Viaw Avenue. To follow up on`that_conversation and pursuant to MOL, Chi. 40A, sec. 7 and City of Salem, ?%seachusetts Zoning Ordinance, Seo. 1 K, B, I am hereby informing you on behalf �i�of Ms.,r Kathie Pall,�rn, the owner of the pro�aisas boated at , 0,.Day View Avenue,";Salem, Massachusetts, that the promises ` located at 85 Bay View Avenue, Salam, rassachusatts, coned ;u by kir, and :ire. Pail W. Pox, of 92 Bay View Avenue (copies of deeds are enclosed) , is being used as a boarding house, which is not a permitted use pursuant to City of Salem, r Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance, Sec. VA and v82, but in fact is *. prohibited use. In addition# ants of this dwelling, in violation sants d oftheCitynofaSalnt e4, rtupassachusetts Zoning ordinance are parking commercial vehicles overnight , in and around the promises located at 95 Bay View *.venue, ~ ,Salem, Massachusetts. (Copies of date&, registration numbers, naw n and addresses are enclosed. Partial List. ) These violations have been wade known by lis. Fallon to Mr, and tTs. Paul W. Box in August of 1976. (Copies of correspondence enclosed.) To elate, they have tailed to correct these violations. NC)N� )!X)OIRY �+ 1a ISP y is ( PAy fi{rM :., - t 01 .t Y} i uw4W+N'YM'MOHWW+Xi-IkW Mh'Y"M 4MN".dFr+"^"•a F+a kt tis_40 , These violations have been made known to the residents of 85 Say view Avenues. Salem, asasaachusetts by Ms. Fallon on numerous occasions. -o data they have failed to correct these violations. The results of theme violations have caused a groat amount of inconvenience and distress not only to rte. Fallon but has caused the Salem 'Police 'apartment to be constantly responding to complaints of the neighbors as to the haphazard parking of the vehicles of the occupants of 8S way view . Avenue. In addition, there is a serious fire hazard oaused:. by such haphazard parking in such a .highly congested area: Accordingly as the Toning Lnforcement officer of the City of Salem, :Massachusetts and pursuant to NOL Ch. 44 A, Seo. 7 and Sec. 1 X 8 of the City of Salem,: Hzasaohueatts <` Zoning ordinance, I hereby request that you enforce the .zoning ordinance against *'r. and 'firs. Paul W. Box and it necessary seek Criminal "'amplaints against them at the first District Court of Essex, Salem, Aassachusetts pursuant to City of Salem, -Massachusetts Zoning ordinance, Sac. I iti. 8. i would also .apprsciate a report of the action you take on this matter and the reasons therefor within 14 days. I have enclosed copies of correspondence from Ms. Fallon which t believe may be of assistance to you. ..' If you have say, questions with reference to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, William J. Lundragan wdz.jw Enclosures •I T.7 a-oe37 ILLIAM E. W[LCN(1939 - 1075) ROBERT W. WELCH MMB dIIbItl�0.19 4 WILLIAM J. LUND[EOAN DANIEL W. 111OIIOAN JANET. MM6Y GI/R9[ [OAM PAUL CUNN[T s/ 'G(1961-17eWer/J G/7/r� ' February 16; 1977 Mr. Charles Connolly Marshall City of Salem, Police Department Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Marshall, ti. Please find enclosed a copy of my letter--da'',�ed February 16, 1977 to John Powers, Building Inspec _ ity 01,,Aalem, Mass. I would like to bring to your gftenton the fact that the occupants of 85 Bay View Avenue, Salem,\1Mb84,¢ersistently and- in complete and utter disregard either fo --theiV, Keighbors or for the flow of traffic have been haphazardly ptj � care in this area of Bay View. Avenue. This is being done t:e =0n annoyance of the neighbors and has resulted in innu a 1e calls to the Salem Police Depart- ment. . Each time the PaiiFertment responds the situation is remedied, however, it appei since it is such a recurring problem a stronger reaction from the Salem Police is called for and I would respectfully suggest towing the vehicles in the future. Furthermore, during the past year repeated calls to the Salem Police Department have been made because of the loud noises and parties being concocted on these premises. Although the Salem Police have responded each time, again I would respectfully ask that a stronger reaction be taken in the future. The occupants have repeatedly been insensitive to the well being of their neighbors. 2 would respectfully suggest that the occupants of 85 Bay View Avenue be prosecuted for either disturbing the peace pursuant to MGL 272-53 or for keeping a disorderly house, pursuant to MGL 272-53. I J d•^. 7 I believe this roquest is most reasonable in light of the duration of this problem. Por your convenience I have enclosed copies of the registration numbers, make, names and addresses of the owners of the offending vehicles. If you have any questions with reference to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, William J. Lundregah WJLJck Enc. K.- w FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF ESSEX APPLIC� h10N FOR A COMPLAtI T OR WARRANT Commonwea t of Massac use s COMPLAINANT City of Salem (Katherine FallonkDDRESS Salem, Massarhrc s 01970 ALLEGED DEFENDANT Mr. & Mrs. Paul Box ADDRESS 82 Bay View Ave, , Salem, III House Contains More Than One Family,Designate Which Apartment) DATE OF BIRTH OFFENSE City of Salem, Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance 1 X B. 5A. 5B2 (Give Chapter and Section of Statute,Ordinance or Regulation Violated) 83 Bay View Avenue, DATE OF OFFENSE February, 1977 to date PLACE OF OFFENSE Salem, Massachusetts (Or if for Noo-Support, Length of Time No Support Had) 0 STATE IF DEFENDANT ARRESTED _YES X NO DATE OF ARREST inapplicable l WAS DEFENDANT BAILED _YES _NO AMOUNT $ inapplicable INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN ON MOTOR VEHICLE VIOLATIONS LICENSE a ISSUED -1: r, REGISTRATION a ISSUED OWNER INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN ON JUVENILE COMPLAINTS ` JUVENILE ADDRESS AGE "y FATHER ADDRESS a % MOTHER ADDRESS ; "A FACTS UPON WHICH YOU RELY FOR COMPLAINT TO ISSUE �k Mr. and Mrs . Box are permitting a residence owned by them at "! #83 Bay View Avenue, Salem. Massachusetts . to be used as a ,' boarding house in violation of the City of Salem zoning ordinance „ WITNESSES - - _ •.. ' ,.`. ser a .. DATE OF APPEARANCE IH COURT Attorney for the C-omplainant: William J. Lundrec,..n , x ,t JAMES M. trLEIp11NG i? ATTORNEY AT LAW - r ' ' 01 �WASNINGTON ST�EHT 4/'. yYt923"3, _ SALEM. MASSACHUsL-TT-4 01070 r' 744-3404 tA` 1 1. May 26. 1977 s'r i•; Mr. .and Mrs. Paul Box 82 BayView Avenue Salem; Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. and Mrg. Box: " k 1 i-have,had several discussions with Attorneyf W kk Lundregan Ahd Attorney Peter R.' Merry ;concerning the alleged violations of the Salem Zoning Ordnance at 83 BayView Avenue; Salem. I have also discussed a possible solution of this pro- p lem ro-plem with Mr. FeceVich, Mi. Fraser and. Mr. Stevens. 'I believe + that all the concerned parties would be satisfied if, the follow- ing conditions were met: r, 1. That there be no .parking by flour tenants or their r quests in front of 81 BayVieW`Avenue, Salem. 2. That there be no ;large parties and/or-congregations, etc, at 83 BayView Avenue, Shcem." + -r 1. That Miss Fallon..be allowed the quiet enjoyment of her home 'at 87 BayView Avenud, Salem. + I believe that these ;conditions a'xe reasonable and 'are thew¢r best possible solution. Furthermore, x have Mr. Steven's, Mr: "i bL Pecevich's and.Mr. Frasers assurances that they will make every st attempt to conform With them. �a .u ` If you have any questions, feelee } rn Sincerely, yet 17ame8 M Fleming C JMF/jCt� J cc., Attorney jqilliam J LAihdregan- Attorney" Peter R Merry. "i Mr,, Ross "'Oiceviah 4 to sM 4�1vt n d & L rte ,J PeeloaNCE—eeaaee7 M Y.4aOla 617-744-0637 p WILLIAM 8. WELCH (1828- 1873) '--� ROBERT W. WELCH WILLIAM J. LUNUREGAN DANIEL W. RIORDAN rL (SI J7AK� JANE T. LUNDREGAN PAUL CUNNEY J. PATRICK BURKE February 16; 1917 Mr. William Tinti City Solicitor 70 Washington Street Salem; Massachusetts 01970 Dear Bill; Please be advised that i 'represent Ms. Kathie Fallon, 87 Bay View Avenue, Salem; Massachusetts 01970. Please find enclosed copies of correspondence that I have sent to- Mr. John Powers, the Building Inspector; Mr. Charles Connolly, the City Marshall; and Mr. James Brennan, the Fire Chief. I believe that this correspon- dence is self explanatory. I would like to point out to you that this has become an intolerable situation in this part of the city and I would appreciate whatever support you could give to the various City Departments in order to rectify the illegal situation that is presently going on at 85 Bay View Avenue. If you have any questions with reference to this matter; please do not hesitate to call me: Very truly you s, Will am J. Lundre n WJL/ck Enc. r pppe 1 y = r ,T, l Y 45) 'Y'Vj 11 rC.�f eromaNce-eaaaaaY 917.7411-0837 WILLIAM B. WELCH (1929- 1915) {Q ROBERT W. WELCH WILLIAMNOR EGAN �� JG1lbG DANIEL W.. RIOROAM ' JANE T. WNDREGAM PAUL CUNNEY, V. - Pebruary 16,' -2977 a Mr. John Powers! Building Inspector •Y + x}� �y City of of Salem Salem, Massachusetts 01970 � dear Sirs Please be advised that p nt me. fmihiwFallon of N ; 87 Hay View Av®nue, Salem,' a sa� yettr ,` *,w ; aMe, Fallon has int at eihe hae corrbepbnded with you' recently with' r the premises lcoatbd at TO follow uue• ax areation and pursuant to M,,., 85 Bay View Aven p P 07. Ch. 40A, Sec. 7 pd!Cit -er alem,' Paeeeohueette- ronjn4'Lj`'' ` Ordinance, Seo X 'a am hereby"'informing you on behalf of rte. Kathie Ion, a owner of the premises located at 871 Hay View ;; ' , Massachusetts; that-thegremi'see located at 85 Ha ' V Avenue, `Salem, Afaseachusette, owned by Mr. and Mrs. Paul W. Box, of 82 Hay View Avenue (copies of deeds are enclosed) , is being used as a boarding house, which is not a permitted use pursuant to City of Salem, taassachusetts Zoning Ordinance, Sec. VA and VB2, but in fact is a prohibited use. + In addition, the 'occupants and transient occupants of thii 'dwalling, in violation of the City of Salem, maseachusetts Zoning ordinance are parking commercial vehicles overnight in and around the premises located at 85 Bay View Avenue, 1, Salem, Massachusetts. (Copies of dates, registration numbers: ; names and addresses are enclosed. Partial List.) These violations have been made known by Ms. Fallon to tdr. and mrs. Paul W. Boa in August of 1976. (Copies of correspondence enclosed.) To date, they have failed to ' correct these violations. k i I These violations have been made known to the residents of 85 Hay view Avenuef Salem, Massachusetts by Ms. Fallon on numerous occasions. To date they have failed to correct these violations. The results of these violations have caused a ,great amount of inconvenience and distress not only to t4s. "Fallon but has caused the Salem Police txepartment to be constantly responding to complaints of the neighbors as to the haphazard parking of the vehicles of the occupants of 85 tray View Avenue. In 'additionf there is a serious fire hazard caused by such haphazard parking is such a highly congested area. Accordingly as the toning Enforcement officer of the City of Salem, mAssachusette and pursuant to HGt. Ch. 40 A, Sec. 7 and Sec. 1 X B of the City of Salem, Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance, I hereby request`'that you enforce the :zoning ordinance against qtr. and Mrs. Paul W, Box and if necessary seek Criminal Complaints against them at the First District Court of' Pssex#,Salem; Massachusetts pursuant to City of `Salem, massachusetts toning ordinance 'Sec. l X' B. I would also appreciate a report of the action you take on this matter and the reasons therefor within 14 days. , I "have enclosed copies of oorrespondence'fzom Ms. Fallon Ohich I believe may be of assistance to you. 'If you have any questions with reference to this matter, plea" do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, William J. Lundregan WJLjcV Enclosures ' A' ' Y c tw f� 611.144-0637 WILLIAM B. WELCH(1929. 1916) - .. ROBERT W.LUAi ND '=? , WILLIAM J. N �j e DANIEL W. RtORDANRDAN + ' JANE T. LU NDREDAN � PAUL CUNNEY February 16, 1977 Mr. Charles Connolly %= Marshall City of Salem, Police Department Salem, Massachusetts 01970 i ` Dear Marshall, Please find enclosed a copy of my 'latter 4od February 16, 1977 to John Paters, Building Inspect6r; City df,;Salem, Mass. I would like to bring to yout t(tt,�40n the fact that the occupants a of 85 Bay View Avenue, SaleI sistently and in oomplete and utter disregard either for--thsic sighbors or for the flow of traffic have been haphazardly par*us 'ttibt�ry cars in this area of Bay View Avenue. I � t This is being done-.-to, t'.he-great annoyance of the neighbors and has resulted in innumerable telephone calls to the Salem Police Depart- Mont. ,f Each time the P611ge Department responds the situation is remedied, however, it appe3r8_thtit since it is such a recurring problem a stronger reaction from the Salem Police is called for and i would ' respectfully suggest towing the vehicles in the future. Furthermore, during the past year repeated calls to the Salem Police Department have been made because of the loud noises and parties being conducted on these premises. Although the Salem k Police have responded each time, again .1 would respectfully ask ?� that a stronger reaction be taken in the future. The occupants have repeatedly been insensitive to the well being s of their neighbors. I would respectfully suggest that the occupants of 85 Bay View Avenue be prosecuted for either disturbing the peace pursuant to MCL 272-53 or for keeping .a 'disorderly house, pursuant to MGL 272-53. P #, T� j i .ralOEwcE—p941E41 I believe this request is most reasonable in light of ,the duration of this problem. For your convenience I have enclosed copies of the registration numbers, make, names and addressee of the owners of the offending vehicles. If you have any questions with refe not hesitate to call me. rence to this matter, Please do , very truly yours, William J. tundregan wsi/ck . n, . Enc: � . .. � •.I). �F ,�N rt �n�� .r v �� �,.� tarn � � i i. .. , . , �`,�, . »1� .N '•r'`F'� t.. ,. . -"ix+.zr i"e v... i �1�:.._�,' i __.. r ., ;..00.i.; u , • ..in um4 `i:t .:n 7`1.�. <1 ,t , .l rze x,r , .d .d. a. �r ,. ILI ^ w, f i �r .a`,. ,c,�w w,a� §: 1,„ :•�" ly .�.,. � RM � o. _k:i'� .. 4 �Y,p ;_ � a 9I k ik r ' G 'f' i r "Y 're M•a�: nteloeMct— 1. 1.f, ((QQ f.rtois 817.744-0837 WILLIAM B. WELCH 11829- 1978i .. ROBERT W. WELCH WILLIAM J. LUNOREGAN 1c% DANIEL W. RIORDAN ('�j0Wet13 i` JANE T. LU NOREGAN60 ; PAUL CUNNEY February 16, 1977 James Brennan, Chief Salem Fire Department r' 48 Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 a J : Dear Chief: Please find enclosed copies of corre_ ondance which I have q sent to Mr. John Powers, the Building Inspe 41 and Mr. 'C�w Charles Connolly, the City Marshal] ,, th referrence to the ? premises located at 85 Bay View;4 en9e Salem, Massachusetts. I believe that .thia correspond api s elf explainatory. The y; reason that I am directing co id this correspondence to you and therefore bringind- to your attention is because of the haphazard A inr� s rate parking of cars ks'. by the tenants of 85 Bay (V(Lew AVIe us. It is the opinion of MY client, Mo. Fallon and a j rity of the neighbors ,in that area that a se7riotjs i {t and is being caused by this haphazard parking./ n numer a occasions the fire apparatus have been unable tet '° that portion of Hay View Avenue. As you are, no dotb , we l�aware this is a very highly congested area and`,a ydtion such as this from a fire pre- vention point of Vielw*d- intolerable. x• I would appreciate it if you could investigate this matter w and take whatever action you deem appropriate. If you have any questions with reference to this matter, Jw Please do not, hesitate to call me. - very truly yours, William J. Lundregan. s� WJL/ck 1 z S Enc. 1 f IW i 1 S` t t i I 1 1 13:894284. �. 282 PC, 0 . A 2RMV - 3520 23 02118!7 H57 EST SAL/05260 STATUS ACTIVE EXP 04/77 i REG 894284 SIMARD WILLIAM' P 315 CHESTNUT ST LYNN EFF 05/07/75 ; • . TITLE INS 544 PEE 12 , 80 WGT CHEVR 1967 IMPALA SEDAN N4DR SGL WHITE TRANS 1 6 PASS V�D 1646972!37087 # 1327M5362. 1 " 282 PC, 2215, 1 'It t 1 4�11 A 2RMV 3534 '. 24 02/18/7 1158 EST 5AL/052$, STATUS ACTIVE EXP 02%78 Rbd 7153'62KITTLES C14ARLE 246, PARK AVE REVERE z.E0 3/09/76 1ITLE .2609113- INS 884 . P E " 1'4 00 "- WGT CHEVR 1964 , BELAIR SEDAN N 2 DR BCL MME TRANS ! 6 PASS �41611GO394t8 a A 4 .S it It Nmlvh 7' 1977 � r - t"t I ll ll Mr. and Mrs. Paul am v :' 82 Day Mier Avenue Saleml MA 01970 Irix,x Dear Mre A. Mrai! Q .y_ This is to notify you that the City of Sapp has lbeen, iny 'PryYti ' °fig G4e loaned that more than two unrelaeaentlyrr^ A renting property at 85 8a Vian Avenue =ie 8hl+bfao i��� �'VH4 �Kpx{�! ea5��f+�p`� v��+�,8���5�'�rt k� •yrs � . Under the soningl ordinance of the CSy.ofk Salem,-tt►i caul` , #3� , stitutes a violation which may be punishablb by a line 520.00 per day for every day that the Violation anntinees�n 'ri �g� a ,5 r 6 Unless the matter. is rectified prior to 1Piei�ay� 'iddrah 18�,t r;,��4 � aY°�,a. r 1977, the City of Salem will take legal action , you• ist kA" 'f 1a "id Aa? ��r ` i i a Very truly `ybnrs��r� ��� , ��Y.'t x! ," Pbter PRMtacd e ,atz� m �' r .�3'Y , k1�p , S M 1 . i P sr - CC1 I(athie 8ailcn n 'pl. l�yx q��" ,� x. s v� f t . V ti�..... t 5r,pr u , 4r L 1 a.. yr 3 r'E] r William �` �.undregan, . r ! Y Y x i t Xtr p 7 p 1 ' i k r vfn o f Nvf fxi a x va yy r r [y� C xt i f 9� k vf }t yr 1 by+'p rs tpf� 1'. ,v a WIv x�� t3x Ru > �3C..y - u } i r ti.4t µtl� � t i " fv' t{�L�'tM v 11 4>'� ♦ },f r rb '.1 v{i rv^if 46si f+ r�3r M ly N'�..kf";,vho`Y ' "�y f7��,� kk.Afj jos f'4ttii I �'y., Ohlf ' ;f��* Ri�; L niss Sathie gallon( t „ . 87 gay Miew Jvenue C S t h a em; sac usetts 01970 x' - Dear Jack, I have been advised that you were the person to contact regarding violations in ' zoning laws. An article In a November issue of The Salem News indicated that the City is prepared to eleminate so-called °unlicensed boarding houses." The house next to me is one of four such houses existing in the residential area of I Salem Willows. Three are owned by absentee landlords. The one next to me is owned by Mir: and Mrs. Paul Box of 82 Bay View Ave. i ,» } Between noise disturbances from parties r: a, and the parking violations of the guests and „ k overnight transients, S and several of my ' neighbors have been disturbed and the Salem 3 police department has been kept busy. 4 During the summer months I complained in Writing to Nrs. Box. Although she advised me that it would not happen again, when it did I spoke to one of the tenants, and on another occasion wad forced to call the police at 4 a.m, . The winter noise has been less offensive but since the 3 male occupants moved in in { y; February of last year Ism taking action in the hope that I can eleminate another summer like the last one, a 8lncerely, } ani �i y , D } � '!p. 4 }4�"1�'4•"� j�ra �f 4M Y Ff�'}r NJt4� a�'•t`{'"f +yj 4 HUll.dtNG OUT16 pIAR 617-74A-0637 WILLIAM B. WELCH UeR OfACC (p /�( q ROBERT W. WELCHet-TY 0i S 4•G 1'I eJWX�/4R/iYCllLr L'b9J Igolvl<lFMlff> lv WILLIAM J. LUNDREGA.N GYI/lb l DANIEL W. RIORDAN e71(ft,1U e1(�4JCy JANE T. LUNDREGAN PAUL CUNNEY J. PATRICK BURKE February 16, 1411 Mr. John Powers Building Inspector City of Salem Salem; Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: Please be advised that I represent Ms. Kathie Fallon of 87 Bay View Avenue, Salem; Massachusetts. Ms, Fallon has informed me that she has corresponded with you recently with reference to the premises located at 85 Bay View Avenue. To follow up on that conversation and pursuant to MGL Ch. 40A, Sec. 7 and City of Salem, Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 1 X B, I am hereby informing you on behalf of Ms. Kathie Fallon, the owner of the premises located at 87 Bay View Avenue; Salem, Massachusetts, that the premises located at 85 Bay View Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, owned by Mr. and Mrs. Paul W. Box; of 82 Bay View Avenue (copies of deeds are enclosed) , is being used as a boarding house, which is not a permitted use pursuant to City of Salem; Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance; Sec. VA and V132 , but in fact is a prohibited use. In addition, the occupants and transient occupants of this dwelling, in violation of the City of Salem, Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance are parking commercial vehicles overnight in and around the premises located at 85 Bay View Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts. (Copies of dates, registration numbers,' names and addresses are enclosed. Partial List.) R+ These violations have been made known by Ms. Fallon to, W«,, Mr. and Mrs. Paul W. Box in August of 1976. (Copies of ; a correspondence enclosed. ) To date, >they have failed to correct these violations. xt e rp PAGE 2 Gi�teyt�i ©UILbING DEPT I(IiJIL-_ L NsR I IB ib AM RECEIVED CITY OF SALEM,MASS! These violations have been made known to the residents of 85 Bay View Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts by Ms. Fallon on numerous occasions: To date they have failed to correct these violations. The results of these violations have caused a great amount of inconvenience and distress not only to Ms. Fallon but has caused the Salem Police Department to be constantly responding to complaints of the neighbors as to the haphazard parking of the vehicles of the occupants of 85 Bay View Avenue. In addition, there is a serious fire hazard caused by such haphazard parking in such a highly congested area. Accordingly as the Zoning Enforcement officer of the City of Salem, Massachusetts and pursuant to MGL Ch. 40 A; Sec. 7 and Sec. 1 X B of the City of Salem; Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance; I hereby request that you enforce the Zoning Ordinance against Mr. and Mrs. Paul W. Box and if necessary seek Criminal Complaints against them at the First District Court of Essex, Salem, Massachusett's pursuant to City of Salem, Massachusetts Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 1 X B. I would also appreciate a report of the action you take on this matter and the 'reasons therefor within 14 days: I have enclosed copies of correspondence from Ms. Fallon which I believe may be of assistance to you. If you have any questions with reference to this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. Ver tru Y yo . s, Wil am J. Lundr an WJL/cv Enclosures q p �a t yy y `M1 1 711.' � r j' ia- written or failura to pa any of said installmonts vilthit�thirty (30). days from the date. when th7same .becomes dud nptwithstajadinS. y.-license t+i` ior,waiver of any prior breach of condition shall make the whole of the ' balance of said principal-slum immediately due and payable at the option of the holder hereof. The holder hereof shall have the' Statutory Pow or ' � sr of Sale for anq breaoh. of shy of the conditions or provisions of this mart gage or the note secured hereby: "WITNESS our hands and seals this 9th ; , " day of December 1939. John M. Calder TU CO2AEIOPt EUTH OF USSACH�SETTS ) . Margaret M. .Calder jEssax is. Salam, Baas., Dec�mbor 9; 1939. Then personally appeared Uihe ; J , above named John M. Calder and Margaret M. Calder and Acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be ,heir free act and, deed, w : before me Daniel C Fitz Notary Public Ma, MY Commission Expires April 12+ 1940. y ------------------------------------ ----- � Essex ss. Received Dec: 9, 939 41 m. past 10 A MRacorded and Examined t, { ---------------------- ---tbl"° II, Beatrice Box, being a widow, of Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts,f4l I J consideration paid, grant tb William Paul Box and Beatrice Box, as 3ointt �, f _ o . � tenants, and not as tenantsiin common, both of said Salem, with QIIITCIAIf� rvi4' ' L,xl,: 115 . COVENANTS the land in to{;et er With the buildings thereon, situated in thg said SAI M in that part the eof known as Juniper Paint, being lot No.41, ( 4 el# fv 1 ' on a plan recorded with Essex South District Deeds, Plan Book 1, Plan Ho ' 115, and bounded as follows: Westerly by lot Pio. 48 on said plan about i fifty 50 feet; Northerly ( " ' y ( } , y �,y high Street twenty-three (23} feat; Seat-; � buy,�i3¢ ori b lot No. 46 on said len about fortynine 49 feet; Southerly b Y Y p - ( ) Y Y 'a no , Bay View Avenue abodt thirij (30) feet. Said premises are conveyed,sub- °" ..: Pers��` jest to encumbrances of record. For title reference see Probate of the on fir?Y IWill of William P. Box, Essex County Probate No. 194,879. No documentary premi8 ; stamps ars required on the ^.4ithin conveyance. WITNESS my hand and seal ba eon$t this ninth day. of December, 11939. Beatrice Boa„ (sesi) ! £at b2 I THE COUTI OF MASSACIfFETTS Essex, as. December 9 1939. Thon per ,, by,as d sonall appeared the above ed Beatrice Box,:and acimowiedged Y PPa . y,oeQr. oing instrument to be her' jamee act and deed ,Richard E. Blaa:' Notary`Pnblio: ,' ntnr rid;; LT conunie'ssion w:pirou 'jP(+ruary 28 1041 --- - q : LT:aFI^U Y...Ha YlidS7 i . 4: ICIi'CO:i under du \1 lLl. of <'k2h,i7SbL'"5.."il.:lii9s^,a[&tF3.°^}�slv:,•,s „�,.;,,..•r'iJ.`li.... '!� }•�J,L' 1,, =.`�r£.Tat .wtii{'ik.�Cb[�.�A , r�{V. Y,lihaano F, Gorman, late of , olom, Fasox County, 6iaocaala7fts t k';i t';", ,� fu -tree: conferral Ir.3 under liconso of the Probate Court in tho l:c;t;a t 4. `fin 1 J:r'.iimina H, Gorman, Essex Pro ate No, 2007160 ' 1 6 i q'r. and nacrg a r'e} c,., .,..-=C3rtoon Thousand (615,000.00) nt,ty ae._..v._.--aaR 1cm Paul Bon and Mary E1loaboth Botr2t3bfizdpaV7111 tt ^:Cs by the ontiroty both of Salem, Eonox Countvl tI.e t.a�d in .^,atom, together wJth �tho buildings thereon, bounctoft a.,:.s new. rlbod ad follows: z FIR:3T 613CELt .. NOAT re-ITE LY by Bay View vonnpa;3�ormorly oalled Control bvcz,ao Y ` { 14.3 feet; + .> R e"y r e GC=SiT,1<13LrILY by Lot 6 on a pl n hereinafter montionod, '00 foot,t )' - •EOUTURESTERLY by the parcel no, t hereinafter d000ribod, 30 foo' e r tai;. ,r+ + NORT'uncSTIt.TLY by Lot 4 on naid'Itplan, 54 foot; be all of cnid Lit,c , u more or Ions, or howevor othcpr.viso bounded and d000ribod• boa prcmioos shorn as Lot 5 on a ."Plan of Cottage Lots bolonr3 G tc rprr I), Goodwin, Jr., at Juniper dint Salem NOW by C. A. Putnra vs dated Ootobor 1875, and r000ildod with Essex South Dintriot 1k rt ; V30011 10 Plan 15; except so M4-0,h thereof, if any, so may have br a Fr by the City of Salem for thecridening of cold Avenue by loaf a h I ..rocorddd with said ibods, Ronk 1769, Pago 525. The d:xollirj i o cs , sold premises is now known aand numbered 82 on said Say view . SECONs PARCEL: NORTRUS2TPLY by the pares orp n o oro described, 30 foot; 3OUIHF.AST"RLY by a prolonantiontof the boundary line between =Id Lots 5 end 6 on said plan, 50 foot; " +> r , SOUTF.7ESTh'RLY by high water mar ; and NORTHWL•STERLY by a prolongation of the boundary lino botwoon cold Late 4 and 5 on said 'plan, le feet; be all of said monnuromonts ',' more or load, or however othe wise bounded and described,, Meaning and intending to eonvoyltho same promises convoyed to Eatherino x'. Gorman and M.. Agnes Gorman, as recorded in Essex South Ldstriol 'fI Registry or Leoda, Book 35020 Page 503, 7 7- ?St: r;.� ,kR Yf '_♦=U � X + iEiw.+,&� �u Fe ie��uil_'" ."=r.�.,�.�r•. � }'} �V � + r Vjtiarca, I 1St :. . ... ..'. ...my, ....hand �and seal this . .� }- __ ........ .day oE..�..jr�CbPllax$ t9Ot a� { l �`� q .s-o/�-.G[l.4erw. ,..t✓....^ ._.......�- c h�o tho> u Katherine F OormaA }... ....... ..... .. ... ......... .. .. ... .. ....... ... .. .. .. 4 �4 i Thr {tEnmutnnmduliti Lit inuoituri}aortts T6µ hi 3 Enaax, . E1. February 20, iht3;t+ 'I f 'l ��Charles E., Hollide + + .deAtha+ alt lrs fhcn personally appcaced the abos c named Y N I 61, " r }, x4e and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to �q his ./..�yjfrree act and deed,before me i4aroh k ii vIR 1,+ • ,r ,. ,F; 4. w 1. ., ' aillie gallo+i 87 guy )icu,cIvitte t , r H k It iSaJefn L�j{assac/)uSe((s 01970. Dear Jack : I have been advised that you were the " )`t. person to contact regar ing violations in zoning laws.,cZ' : V Ani article in al?oNember issue of the Salem Evening News indicated that the City Is prepared to elemina.tb so-called +'unlicens- ed boarding houses. " k The house next to Ie is 'one of four such y '' a houses existing in the residential area of Salem Willows. Three ar;c o4rned by absentee landlords. The one next to me is owned by 11r. and Rts. Paul. Box of 82 Bay View Ave Between noise disturbances from parties t' and parking violations of the guests and over ight transients, I'and "� , ° cv� l 4! several of my neighbors have been disturbed and 't+` the police department had been kept busy. During the summer months I comp lained �!+ to i1rs. Box in iariting. ^ me it would not happen againland when it diff I spoke to one of--the to }'ants who told me, ride are young, we like ,life# and that's the. way ore ate going to live. (n the third occasion I called the police at 4 a.m. The officer on " duty told me he had 'a1 eady' sent the oruiser in response to two ear-. ier complaints. and', would send them again. 'Phe vrinter noise has been less offensive but since thky moved in February of last year i am talang &ction in the hope that) P { .. � � jj i i February i0, 1977 f Dear Billt i ds. I told you in my phone conversation last night i the winter noise has been less offensive than the summer with the exception of Christt�as Eve when it was unabated until 500 a.m. Christmas morning, On Thursday, Feb. 3, a less crowded party continued i until 3 a.m: i I told Jack Powers, in our phone conversation, that the Shaws were unable last summer to make use of their poroh (at no 81) or allow their children to use it, because of the obscene Jokes and foul language, I know you say this does not matter so the only other support I have is the list of number plates which 1 havo found most frequent over a six: month period. ' Xr 4; r :a , ° 3"yFfi Oji j jn • Fl.{. .lt - t t j a(i r r tI�rtly tft`cr my conversat on with you in late' June rot, MI.:, ne 7 door. raeir hbore and my Utter to 11rs. Box {copy attack • ,plied with a brief greeti on the street, Slid sa9.d, p . your IattaT and you will no have any more troubZeprr .. hZ , I clad No,rever €allow your uggestion, and tried to 1tees} racy of ruaaber elates; ` In dei this I became avrare of �tho , ille{aZ parkia1.,;s Sundays and FIo idays, permitted to this :. , rvtifir z aL��, tlhen Txso Ploltrthur was b1e. to get her car out ''{ �gp l� '4 .2ut' or ;the :ctrueli Ob uruCti her, she called the yfir0' =e'`.1t4 + .�3eV'.�nG•.'.i6 a Fire - so there was. & lot Of;`,lau�,hter, "' rt p�'atr fi arawng hlm .a"nd the men on the la der truck when Steverss' f moved rr `�' , t tiara}t' ` Nj p ear and the firemen called er down because the tail of her car was beyond the curb on or hottop, �:,, � ' "uppo^edly;thero are 3 mon renting the :house but dJc6uple of @lrl , echo come out fairly ea ly in the morning snd are to Lxeet me •vea,^y cheerily with have a nice day," seem t<i:be a fairly, regular;, Since they use the cars belonging to Steens and :Pachavitch to bring home th groceries, I have iso idea aft+ «,_ }k N r•�1' Tho week of 'August 23 I no iced that a lone :man, Tsew td mof'` ' earie cut of the house every mo Ing and sat on the porch readiti �'� b'r ul a p pets,,, He otherwise never seemed to leave the house: On ! tie f' lamn Aug. 269 he came down o f bhe porchtd and unlocked his u, 'car, , took something from It and returned to the house' was ..�`,? ' f, sitting on my neicep porch, No 19 and I said, I' think that guy r " is-'living there too:" "I know he is she said, and ha°s`.not the; �9k> a only one,;besides the mmmm ones hat are supposed was bo there* + He.stayed for'about another wee His number was 7-mom 5362. f � , �� •. It was comparatively quietL;u�ntil Saturday, Apg. 2� when was avr€ilcened at 2 a.m. by what med to be a riot inthe street':When, I, looked out there were prps 20 or even 30, people standing , ,x iamo d' in groups, all with liquolr in their hands. A large red wcod ',sided truck was there and the only ones I could identify w * S cscept Stevens, was a kid up the' street, Billy McCarthy who was standSng. In the truck drinking € om a can. At that point the cruiser came along and. a couple f men talked through the car ' s{ . •q r �< windevr to the police, It qulete down fez^ a short time `then it. bagan_ in,earnest on the porch ne t doer. They were tlizrowing' oasse *` ona bottles into the street and Bally yelling. • At five minutes of four I called the police. I earned later that they had to :: , _ Y make three trips,' On Thursday, Sept. 20 I cam home from a friends house , ry at M15. There was a police o in front of the Box house y ' <bui: no ligh'cG.on in the house, then Z got out of .my car, Ifen Green was .talking to the lone po_iceman. I couldn°t imagine vrhat e 3 " t ad lw rdnded but I later,back�toBil hi house,gI called him and ' r2'fe.T4 I1lnixtes•,then a$� out trhat.,was wrong: His daughte told me someone had caoanplained F about blmcl Ong the fire lanes, the policeman was waiting fob t r, a tuer truok�, When the truck came the cruiser moved up the ptreet'" '°AFS i' trr and,a gir ;.oamo ,Prom the back of the house next dour, aloes the iii pol>ch and :spoke •to the truck dri, rei. I don't know,whcit wary' ek9 ��� � butt the a,tek 4raB• my�vede , + �.1 rt ygs':'ti ril`,#V,}`ar}��iti �,�^'� ,t� Y�. �a','rP� �'1y "� , is 1' S :nr .r.?t d `8�.a • 1, 44i`d ,{ ,.(�•S R I�! , :,� 4^.ti , , r , , 1 at,li G+y�'AE..T,, '`.x r�a•y , fi Page 2 t Sa•turdaq, Sept. 4th, while I was entertaining oompahq, Rosa Porsevitoh, also a tenant', came to my door and said~ "T want to speak to you."" I st piled outside with mq ,friends . 41 listening and he said, "I was old that you were the one that: had my car toured and I ha to Pay $22," :a ~ I said, '"Z had nothing to do with your car but Z did call at 4 o"clock mmmmfn last week to stop your noise and you "dust bettor believe T•>ri riot going to Put up with' any more of it." 4. y He started jabbering some hing about my calling him s when it was noisy and he'd sto 1t but not to call th0 police:' , ' . somewhere in his chatter I he d him say that one of his . .. firemen friends was going to m ve in with the guy next door. , I was so shocked I didn't answer because th'e house nest . ' door was legitmately rented to 10 months by my nice to a t man and, his wife. He is a teat er of piano and voice at 7` .A• Marblehead High school and was recommended to her by Jane Dione on Juniper. lifter he m ved in (and he seems like a r ti v -very nice person) 'it turned ou that his wife was .,completing her senior year at college and would only be: e here at .Christmas and Eastercation. r4 Shocked at the possibilI y at one more "Pied Light". + ,house in the neighborhood, I i ediately Balled Ann in a r• Bethesda: ', She knew nothing abut the wife not living there, x , and had not received the lease from World Realty who handled the property:, She insisted t t the house NOT be let tither toa;group of, man or women bee use, as she said, "She ,had ohildr0n of her own to bring u and she did not like the _ : y set up. next door anymore than did." The Boa house Is 11 lo ;f between the two of us: i tol her what I heard on.the ^ ` c';` G ,d f fireman story; she had twice ailed World Realty. '"'First k "" A # they said that the lease was i the mail and matte out to a xr' roan °and .his *1fd When it did not arrive she called again ' 'aanrl` theg said they had been wa ting for his ch.eak to'. clear":: I, ai1d the 'leaso¢was bade -out -to man and his wife and &I min a ' t w$io was' either friend or family was going to lifo vr$th' them.' r al Shu then'el'ed �Pau2 Surface, er tenant, who told her"that s it was a: fireman who was a fri nd of b= his; She F "3 a^keds .him; =and4explained herr asons, if he had azq ,connePti+ ri r urll�h tftio next door 'neighbors. He twice told her "NO" tt' Y111,10v a; time is $ab_Pelletier he is a Salem •f?remanr, but no canneot3ons with the group n the fox house. . he is very upset. She I s not signed her leaseyet t , < � xY F `because she lhad not received i I rim to find out wha.tal ,ara�7 a{ + about Palletier and call her a 8 p.m• Sunday* i y �El t3 ��i§ k'�h ,e l� 4 � , � ' t F + 1 > a ��} y, {qS V _ �k 1 ��o{vC 1 ��l C• •rh iE,4e�� e� ti �q �twv x u �N q.' , 11 i � 1 r k=.: n 1 ° Yil. ,n f7i ,. { ./�a t t ♦ Z � P I ;Trane 24, i9:76 L ` � Dear Bea: J 5, `t a'♦ ti e^1 f W �t As you will recall when your neva tenants, (now my next door neighbors,) were moving in, everal of the neighbors sr were very much upset. In fact I eceived one telephone y , call and was approached by otherslIin the hope of forestalling a condition that could be similarlto the recent aggravation® el of 142' Boy View Ave. I aM1{ er I 'am sure that this was the reason that you approached me ,at,'the time and asked me to report any disturbance directly to you: I chose, as you1know, to try to get along t71tYi my new neighbors .as I had wish your four different tenants during the past ten years. I also aaid I would �y �"' let; ,you be the first to know if I could not handle the a, # s ationi ` I have made that effort and pile I have no personal a " aTiomisity,;toraard their style of li e, -I have strong objections:� r to being awakened in 'the pre-dam ours by excessive volume a etero;-and lraucl ,ta1k and laughter You aro fortunate to be sleep ng the the back of your a l ' 11 hoarse aand"prehaps ha;ve been undis urbed. I am not so fortunate'. ,♦ � ,`��'��' en Twlee in:tour to approximately isaireektof excessive he tsix feet be eI have hbeen ouse £ar ed o a+iop anxaers _of a shrei4 and oall ac oss the opening for quiet. '. last night. 2 aem. and 3:45 1 was frustrated ,even beyond,,chore ���, ; effort:" .Since I doubt if I would ven be heard beyond the dins,;, < , : a t 1 censi�ierod wither phoning you ar the palace. 1 sufforcdAt out and this'mo Ing feel much the, worse far oe leteder 110 k lththazard tois time tmet o make ke a crowded music hall complaint. I �winth`3�s c.ti, fas of a,private home, a diol tion of zoning laws: ' hopo tha " you will find som way to alleviate thih ,' a T,tuation,bee 0=6 .,1t becomes out o proportion. ;,� u Sincerely, i r r F Kathie Fallon [, C`�f£iCf�♦"✓K.G�„I' � ��.�"�"' - `Y/�z 't -• {i} ::.y("�' fM•�..vi.� _—O ,;,� ' �^ ,�/p. Ii'V'4P/( !.11''.' yT ^'�.�/ .ir (M1yy,��j Md xy �IV ;e',' ,♦�A'. "�+�'.Sa,/.i�n _ ,, ,,y .rf/`l:L-LI/l /A4/- tl ! r +,!" 'tsi'�'. i't B T ! /�r� is , � n._ �•,�.{R ��e+_^,5° f'Pu r ''' ✓F r •rA J. C SI�..d�3 � { F �e„:'uf..•. f`3..L:.f7.."O 4. ,�' f n ..^':kyr '-✓';,,n f t:.yN i u�!�'i✓:✓ n ° _ Mat of 'registrationsi v' June 26 E39803 H 52897 'T June 27 320-32Y Juno ,.28 8, 34862 ' R iy 7-11 5362 . , not moved for more than a week, day or night.", r�"r tk " ,AA 69 615' fairly regular on weekends I ` v j' ,E\22 461: regular visi or E 38 4115 gat w r . " 302-58w fJ'u]y N H 94 184 : 4q j1hi5A P6/ ?77 t ` BB20 557 1 1 fl / C L T ' S�Q It li 4 4 111 G'1��p4-tb i yt I air I 11 M41� C (I finbF i t I1f d • 1 i i w • J f ��r > 1 j 1 1 1 � t ���: C L-t.•T z IM J .Ii .i ..vim( r.. � /..•' + •,moi , j� t 1 , � to pi 1 S f fi � to r •�i� Y •t•..'� �':yaU �� fi N1��<�� 1FC'➢ �'� �SIF I,,I�h�l @nil A`ka.'�''�� If.�.'� 1 June 24t 1916 Dear Bea: r As you will recall 'hen your new tenants, nota my next door neighbors, were mavi'ng in, several of the neighbors were very much upset. I fact I received one telephone call. , and was approached by otters in the hope of forestalling a condition that could be imilar to the recent aggravations ;:. , of 102 Bayview. I am sure that thi was the reason that you approached } me at the time and asked me to report any distrubanee, directly to you. I Cho e, as you know, to try to get along with my new neighbors, as' I had with your four sxdur different tenants during the past 10 years. I also, said:2 ' would let you mnmffi be the first to know if I could not handle the situation. I have made that ef fort and 11 xhtliff while I have no:p'ers*al i ' anomisity toward their style of life, I have strong objections to being d zkurbvd awak ned in the pre-dawn hours by excessive ` � volume o a stero and lo d tall_; and laughter. �, } You are fortunate to be sleeping; in the back of your t house and prehaps have been undisturbed. I am not so `fortunate ' ^ There is approximately six feet between my house and your tenants: ' Twice thtp- in his week of excessive heat S have ��'; ,►Y,= fy been foreed to adopt the ers of a shrew and the opening for quiet. last night betweenmr3 2 a¢i', and s 3045, I was frustrated even beyond. that effort. Since I ddubt « i V : Y if, I could even be heard beyound the din, I consideredeither phoning you ar the police. fl Vit, out I suffered it mm and this morning feel muoh the wor6b dor vicar so' Z think it time to make my complaint. 3 ,consider, Abse ` r of . sleep a health hazard to me, and. a crowded music hall vrlthiri ' six feet, a violation of zoning lav,*s. :r. of a private home, a 1 I hopo t t you will find some way to alleviate this ". 4 'S+ w ' situation/ p M ° IN Y% Y°y4i7�—��.,(��["'�. Ian 891 fill ll y ! , ti C A 5 - Yt y.y if (��yy`J'n(%eft , _ ♦ c S Yi 1 yr 4 i > �Y t ... : A0 f # t rF , �Vcf 711 Wn,?,4 0!", 1' ~ jAst of number plates on cars ,requ nting 85 $ayview Ave June, p f July and August 1976 r E39.803 regularly from early even ng to 9 a.m. • 320-32Y Hr 3 862 ._ T, Y f Mj..^ J1 Stin 894284 1 41 5362 -belonged to dark man who stayed in house or on porch for x week; r ,y "AA69615 white truck not moved for four days NPO-777 �w BB20 .55,7 4: E46-461 ` FSS ., IN E38 425• 7 G 3025814 rough cha racter ; T T7 52 229 ;.$3gg031 - man has house key - B1u and white coupe ,O jF 2901 332'-75Nt �� r •. a 1 �t •' Yr - k� 11,1 rt4, e. • 7 " " kP;> L,yµ� uy ,. � ! a 3 2 �. {.n�' ;�i:�:+ - d v4i0°'1 H� �. , i') f +l'1:•. 13sE3980 28i pr. 22 f5, x # r it ' 13sR52897 , 28e PC. 22 s5. r 1 r.. 7 t a A 2RMV 2854r 9 ' { STATUS ACTIVE ERP 02/18/77 E1104 EST SA 52 w REG E39803i u 6 LORIS Rd MARRON 03/77 RUSSELL N t TITLE PEA BODY EFF 01/19/76 CH INS 514 (1 t . BLUER 7RANCAMARO CONVTBLFNp 2DR®6CLGI a „ PASS VID 123679N611945 r . 9 # ! A 2RMV 2958 6 '� STATUS ACTVE IS 02!18/77 1105 gT REG R5 I EXP 07/78 SAL/0528. i ,E qty 24 HAWTHORN CAHILL PATRICIA A " TITLE D9569 E6LLVD SALEM . EFF 08/11/96 J VOL KS 19 74 EETL E NSED33 FEE 14 Ed_. WG T ' r f i GREEN IRA S 2 4 AN NO ! Ill $ DR 4CL ! PASS VID 1142324598 A 2RMV 2893 16 02/18/77 1109 EST SAU05284 STATUS INACTI E EXP 12/77 s < i ' REG 32032Y WIRTANEN LINDA J 26 BECKFORD ST BEVERLY EFF 01/01/76`., TITLE 1554069 INS 033 FEE 12 09 11GY74 FIAT 1972 STA WON NO 128 2DR 4CL GREEN TRANS 2 5 PASS VID 128 AF0994151 0At STATUS ACTIVE EXP 12/77 f; REG 32032YIRTQNEN LINDA J 26 BECKFORD T BEVERLY EFF 08/27/76 TITLE F851517 INS 033 FEE 3 00 WOT ti SUBAR 1976 STA WON NO AG 4L 4DR 4CL RED , TRANS 21 5 PASS VID A64 L809904 to 3 13YR34862. 29: PC. ; r 6 , A 2RMV 293 17 0?/18/77 1 11 1 EST SAL/0529. STATUS STOLE CAR/ PLATE, 0505 EXP 02/77 'il REG R34962 RASER HARRYC JR 10 16 JUNIPER A E SALEM EFF 11/1®/75 '" t TITLE E93344 L INS 889 FEE , 3 00 ,WGT ti -;`4 AUD1 1974' 1 0LS SEDAN NO ' 4 DR 4CL GREEN TRAMS 1 5 PASS VID 5141®66739 aW- w eat 26 X.-23& A�rvrJ -rf'�T • ,ly int. �S�'N3'17S i0 W� 03A1393ti It.NV 91 DI 1 BVW � ia�o 9NIn'�►�e M I x {5} H��11 SNOT C's" TED) AVENUE n 23' MAP 44 LOT 94 a � : JOHN & ANN SHAW 81 BAY VIEW AVE. ENCLOSE MAP 44 LOT 96 EXISTING PORCH a DEBORAH ADAIR #81 87 BAY VIEW AVE. #83 #87 MAP 44 LOT 95 n AREA = 1300 t S.F. remove ` =_ 2•+ / brick chimney / PORCH 30' M BA y VIEW AVENUE ZONING DISTRICT — Rt REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED FRONT 15 3'f 3't SIDE 10 EAST - 0 EAST - 0 WEST - 1't WEST - 1't REAR 30 2't 2't LOT COVERAGE 30% 65% 65% ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PLAN 83 BAY VIEW AVENUE SALEM PROPERTY OF LINDA ST. PIERRE I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDINGS SCALE 1" = 10' APRIL 3, 2015 HEREON ARE LOCATED ON NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION THE GROUND AS SHOWN. 14 BROWN ST. — SALEM, MA 978-744-4800 0 10 20 DATE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #4161 83 f3 Ay � � � AvE Supp Tab. /// I 5 M E A D? KEEPING YOU ORGANIZED No. 10301 OXWFDM Ow =r. w�oeaue� GET ORGJW IZED AY S&W.COM r: le Qo�q CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET* SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 KIMBERLEYDRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAx:978-740-9846 1015 JON 29 P 3 51 MAYOR FILE # June 29, 2015 Decision O Y CLERK- SALEM,MASS. City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of LINDA ST. PIERRE, seeking a Special Permit requesting relief from Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single- and Two-Family Residential Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter or structurally change a7 non-conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch located at the property of 83J BAY,VIEW(Map 44 Lot 95)(Rl Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 17, 2015 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, 5 11. The hearing was closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran (Chair), Peter A. Copelas,Jimmy Tsitsinos, Mike Duffy and Tom Watkins. The Petitioner seeks a Special Permit from the provisions of Sec. 3.3.5 Nonconforming Single- and Two-Family Residential Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter or structurally change a non-conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch. Statements of fact: 1. In the petition date-stamped May 26, 2015, the Petitioner requested a Special Permit per Sec. 3.3.3 Nonconforming Single- and Two-Family Residential Structures of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, to alter or structurally change a non-conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch. 2. Ms. Susan St. Pierre presented the petition on behalf of the petitioner. 3. The porch is dimensionally non-conforming as the side-setback is three (3) feet away from the side- yard lot line. In accordance with the Salem Zoning Ordinance, any porch that was constructed before 1965 can be enclosed by right provided that the porch is a minimum of five (5) feet from any side or rear lot line. 4. The petitioner proposes to enclose a 12 foot long section of an existing side porch. 5. The footprint of the porch is not proposed to change. 6. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the petitioner to alter or structurally change a non- conforming structure to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch. 7. At the public hearing, no (0) member of the public spoke in support and no (0) members spoke in opposition to the petition. A petition of support with numerous abutters was presented to the Board for the record. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after„thor of the petition};,1 &Ju g, gl a�n4cation narrativ nd • Tans makes the following findings:li � J�1� 2' :2d15 ,AOE .ci !: .lol'<t rift ', t llere ry CAN dalfo'2jvc e----- .,r3Jr v' :tt1®dtatethlollstrurnregt msa;; i cCel=,d, and to NO APPEAL has been filed innthlo - tc A 1hie Copy 10C( c ATT Mi . iI ,_tee afn; uxu, -�I s City of Salem Board of Appeals - June 29,2015 Project: 83 Bay View Avenue Page 2 of 2 Findings for Special Permit: 1. The proposed change or extension of a non-conforming structure would not be more substantially detrimental than the existing non-conforming structure to the impact on the social, economic or community needs served by the proposal. 2. There are no impacts on traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading. 3. The capacity of the utilities is not affected by the project. 4. There are no impacts on the natural environment,including drainage. 5. The proposal conforms to the existing neighborhood character. 6. The potential fiscal impact,including impact on the City tax base is positive. D On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Rebecca Curran' (Chair), Peter A. Copelas, Jimmy Tsitsinos, Mike Duffy and Tom Watkins) and none (0) opposed, to approve the requested Special Permit to allow the enclosure of an existing covered porch subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: Standard: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board. Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed witbin 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Lams Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted berein shall not take effect until a ropy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registg of Deeds. This notice posted on "O,<,ffi' alI S If i ewrd" City Hall, Salem, Mass. (,f, \ �itl1 � ata:SD�! in accoroce MGLChap. 30A, . Sections.'1825. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts ° Board of Building Regulations and Standards CITY OF Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR SALEM Revised Mar 2011 Building Permit Application To Construct,Repair,Renovate Or Demolish a One-or Two-Family Dwelling e� This Section For Official Use Only Building Permit Number: a Applied`. ff Building Official(Print Name) Signature Date SECTION 1:SITE INFORMATION 1.1 Property Address: 4-Le 1.2 Assessors Map&Parcel Numbers 1.1 a Is this an accepted street?yes no Map Number Parcel Number r 1.3 I 1g Information: 1.4 PUrty Dimensions: Zoning District Proposed Use Lot Area(sq ft) Frontage(ft) 1.5 Building Setbacks(ft) PA- Front Yard Side Yards Rear Yard Required Provided Required Provided Required Provided 1.6 Water Supply: (M.G.L c.40,§54) 1.7 Flood Zone Information: 1.8 Sewage Disposal System: Public❑ Private❑ Zone: _ Outside Flood Zone? Municipal❑ On site disposal system ❑ Check if yes❑ SECTION 2: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP[ 2.1 Owner'of Record: Name(Print) City,State,ZIP O � &l zeU t�-Ue No.and Street Telephone Email Address SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK'(check all that apply) New Construction❑ 1 Existing Building❑ I Owner-Occupied ❑ Repairs(s) Alteration(s) ❑ Addition ❑ Demolition IVTAccessory Bldg. ❑ Number of Units Other ❑ Specify: Brief Description of Proposed Work': l a SECTION 4:ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Item Estimated Costs: Official Use Only Labor and Materials 1.Building $ 8O0 1. Building Permit Fee: $ Indicate how fee is determined: ❑Standard City/Town Application Fee 2.Electrical $ ❑'Total;Project Cost'(Item 6)x multiplier x 3.Plumbing $ 2. Other Fees: $ / 4.Mechanical (HVAC) $ List: 56 5.Mechanical (Fire $ Suppression) Total All Fees: $ Check No. Check Amount: Cash Amount: 6.Total Project Cost: $ 8J ODD ❑Paid in Full ❑ Outstanding Balance Due: �-,I �0 �IOwrL SECTION 5: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5.1 Construction Supervisor License(CSL) � a•e • . � Q l V e i Expiration License Number Date : Name of CSL Holder q Rot List CSL Type(see below) o L: -N p �.m r k c tt m" K of Type. . Description �:. No.and Street r Unrestricted(Buildings u to 35,000 cu.ft. C)Jetz:e� t�i ea 30 Restricted 1&2 FamilyDwelling City/Town,State,ZIP M Masonry RC RoofingCovering WS Window and Siding SF Solid FuelBurning Appliances �y, �,�, a2 H r i Insulation Telephone rP— Email address C4 WL D Demolition 5.2 Registeered Home Impro(vement Conti/actor(HIC) ) A ) :1 ��Cd.� �J SeF t2k.r HIC Regi—straWtion Number Expiration Date HIC Cemgatry Name or HIC Registrant Name r [7 d Mrt 1�2 No.and Street I , Email address �YL0'p Ci /Town,.State,ZIP Telephone SECTION 6:WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT(M.G.L.c.152.§ 15C(6)) Workers Compensation Insurance affidavit must be completed and submitted with this application. Failure to provide this affidavit will result in the denial of the Issuance of the building permit. Signed Affidavit Attached? Yes .......... No...........❑ SECTION 7a:'OVMR AUTHORIZATION TO BE COMPLETED WHEN OWNER'S AGENT OR CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR BUILDING PERMIT I,as Owner of the subject property,hereby authorized to act on my behalf,in all matters relative to work authorized by this building permit application. C_L��i. �� P •e_rCe Print Owner's Name(Electronic Signature) DaE SECTION 7b:.OWNERt OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DECLARATION By entering my name below,I hereby attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that all of the inform Ition contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and understanding. Print OwneYs or Authorized Agent's Name(Electronic Signature) Date i NOTES: 1. An Owner who obtains a building permit to do his/her own work,or an owner who hires an unregistered contractor (not registered in the Home Improvement Contractor(HIC)Program),will not have access to the arbitration program or guaranty fund under M.G.L.c. I42A.Other important information on the HIC Program can be found at www.mass.gov/oca Information on the Construction Supervisor License can be found at www mass. ov/dos 2. When substantial work is planned,provide the information below: Total floor area(sq.ft.) (including garage,finished basement/attics,decks or porch) Gross living area(sq.ft.) Habitable room count Number of fireplaces Number of bedrooms Number of bathrooms Number of half/baths Type of heating system Number of decks/porches Type of cooling system Enclosed Open 3. "Total Project Square Footage"maybe substituted for"Total Project Cost" I DEMOLISH -� EXISTING CHIMNEY I I I INSTALL REPAIR NEW VENT CLAPBOARD TO MATCH AND TRIM REAR ELEVATION TO MATCH EXISTING LL - - - - -I NEW SIMP50N DOOR ><1504 i I FRONT ELEVATION ,4 / CITY OF-gALEn — q� �� PUBLIC PROPERTY t a DEPARTMENT KINISM-EY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHING'rON 5'17tFEr* JALLK M,,,+cncHt;st-rrs 01970 TEL 978-745-9595 ♦Fvc 978.730-9W APPLICATION FOR THE REPAIR, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION. DEMOLITION. OR CHANGE OF USE OR OCCUPANCY, FOR ANY EXISTING STRUCTURE OR BUILDING 1.0 SITE INFORMATION ' Location Name: Building: Property Address: k3 13c�w e-c.J Property is located in a; Conservation Area Y/N Historic District Y/N 2.0 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 2.1 Owner of Land Name: Lis CarC— Address: S� Telephone: $z7—Z/`/o.6 3.0 COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR WORK IN EXISTING BUILDINGS ONLY Addition Existing .21 Renovation Number of Stories Renovated Change in Use New Demolition Existing Approximate year of Area per floor (sf) Renovated construction or renovation of existing building New Brief Description of Proposed Work: .J �tXoI,L �Sf7r1y �4ck �rc�i l=f�rc✓ JZ'dJ �� u>Jh Mail Permit to: l�( - What is the current use of the Building?Material of of Building? w" 2L If dwelling, how many units? r y Will the Building Conform to Law? s Asbestos? Ny Architect's Name Address and Phone Mechanic's Name Hi /�vr✓ n�w5�< </7&-375 �� Address and Phone 9 /d/bv/�S Sf S�le'y I-A!L Construction Supervisors License# 09 HIC Registration# Estimated Cost of Project$�' a Permit Fee Calculation Permit Fee$ � Estimated Cost X$7/$1000 Residential Estimated Cost X$11/$1000 Commercial An Additional $5.00 is added as an Administrative charge: Make sure that all fields are properly and legibly written to avoid delays in processing. The undersigned does hereby apply for a Building Permit to build to the above stated specifications. Signed under penalty of perjury Date � oI ' N eN b d �- OQD FS5 W y C O, u ti. C C' 04