Loading...
30 BARNES CIRCLE - BUILDING JACKET _ . � C� �c�c�� C��� ___� .r�- Citp of Salem' '41a$!5ACbUgPtt$ Public Prnpertp Department 3guil0ing Mepartment (One Salem Oreen (976) 745-9595 ext. 360 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer August 3, 1999 Dino & Deborah Simoetti 30 Barnes Circle ,. Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 30 Barnes Circle: Dear Mr. & Mrs. Simoetti: This department has contacted you previously regarding the filling of your back and side yard. As discussed earlier, a drainage alteration plan is required any time you alter elevations more than two feet. You are directed to cease filling and or stock piling any more materials. You are also directed to contact the City of Salem Engineering Department within fifteen (15) days upon receipt of this letter. Failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against you in Salem District Court. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, / Thomas St. Pierre Assistant Building Inspector cc: Engineering Department SEP 1'1 8 c4 _ Nii U9 Chi of Arm assar4usetts i �HTY 0:.- . ::.. Pourb of �C�Ii�TP2Il DECISION ON THE PE=CN OF ROBERT J. STILIAN FOR VARIANCE AT 13 CLARK ST., 26 BARNES CIRCLE,t3O_BARNES'CA iLr and 34 BARNS CIRCLE, ASSSESS�IJRS MAP 3 ?DPS 81, 82, 85 & 86 BARES'CIRCLEJC[ARK SIREET (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held August 16, 1989 with the following Boara Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Febonio, Luzinski, Nutting and Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner, represented by Attorney Robert Ledoux, is seeking variances for three of four lots on a proposed subdivision which do not meet the required area and for one lot which does not meet frontage requirements. The lots are also identified on Assessors Mao 3 as lots 81 , 82, 85 and 80. The locus of the property is in an R-1 district. The variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finaing of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the lana. building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. _' iteral enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; _. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the qubiic gcod and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or' the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented. and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Several abutters, as well as other residents of the immediate area, spoke in opposition to the petition, citing the addition of traffic to heavily `raveled adjacent streets, blasing problems, and changes in the drainage Patterns in the area. _. The locus could be developed by the petition if the lots were joined. On the basis of the above findings of _`act, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property ana not the district generally; Y Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT STILIAN FOR VARIANCES FOR 13 CLARK ST. , 26, 30 and 34 BARNES CIRCLE, SALEM page two Therefore, after a motion to grant the requested variances, with conditions, was made and duly seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeal vote 0-5 against granting the requested variances. The petitioner failed to receive four (4) affirmative votes and, therefore, the variances are denied. VARIANCES DENIED James M. Fleming, Esa. Chairman, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CIT'_' CLERK S.icti^.n i; ct _. .._. .0 G f'.Ir. i, ..� :!C,Jinn ❑ tile, tithe et the L:t'i C-ork. of Boer. • i ra ,1 a=n t i..en t r tee ms_ed or r nied is r corral in in °outh Ecsex F, 'stry cr D. d_ and Indexed under the name or the oimer of record or is recoracd and noted on the o.vner's Ccrtificato of Title. BOARD OF AppZq�,