The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 INITIAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT I. r I LJ j. A u Li r 1 FT i u f r i {ice BETA Group, Inc. rr 1 ' City of Salem, Massachusetts ' tIaitiaESite=Assessm�ent-R�ep G Salem-Landfill 12 Swampscott Road Salem, Massachusetts 1 Apri1�2002 Prepared for: ' Northside Carting,Inc. 141 Rear Lynnfield Street ' Peabody,MA 01960 ' AUG 14 2002 CI I'Y OF S)kLEM ' BOARD OF HEALTH ' ry"is BETA Group, Inc. 1 Engineers•Scientists•Planners ' 1429 Residence HIgWmy.Sude 117,No ,MA 02062 781 255.1982 t 781 2551974 6 Bladatrne V.IH y Place,Lincoln,RI 01865 491 333.2382 tax 401.333.9225 88D Hess SOeek New I don,U 06329 860.437.0239 email:BETA@BE(Aang mm 1 tTable of Contents Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE.SUMMARY I t2.0 INTRODUCTION 4 ' 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION A) Site Assessment/Landfill Closure 5 ' B) General Description 5 C) Site history and past operational practices 6 ' D) On-site Facilities 7 tE) Site Status/Chronology 7 F) Physical features 10 ' G) Abutting property owners and land uses 10 4.0 HISTORICAL RESEARCH A) Solid Waste Haulers 14 B) Waste streams and quantities 14 i C) Historical Maps and Acrial Photographs 15 5.0 LITERATURE/DATA SEARCH ' A) General 18 B) Previous operational plans 18 C) Previous groundwater& site studies 19 ' D) Results of Previous Studies 20 E) Site workers interviewed 20 ' F) Underground Utilities 20 ' G) Potential Environmental and Public Health Sensitive Receptors 20 1 l� ' Table of Contents (cont.) Page 6.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ' A) Soils and Bedrock 23 ' B) Topography and Elevations 23 C) Surface Water/ Groundwater 24 7.0 SITE VISIT tA) General 25 ' B) Condition of landfill surface/cap 25 C) Direction(s)of surface water run-off 25 ' D) Location and condition of all monitoring devices 26 E) Location of leachate breakouts 26 F) Evidence of landfill gas emissions 26 ' G) Location and condition of surface water and wetlands 26 H) Landfill operation procedures 27 ' 1) Land uses of adjacent properties 27 J) Landfill accessibility 28 ' K) Other Comments 29 8.0 MAPPING 29 ' 9.0 FIELD SCREENING 30 ' 10.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 31 11.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 33 12.0 LIMITATIONS 34 ' ll i Attachments, Figures, and Appendices ATTACHMENTS Attachment A- References Attachment B- People Interviewed Attachment C- Sequence of Events FIGURES ' Figure I - One Mile Radius Map Figure 2- One Mile Solid Waste Assessment Priority Resources Map Figure 3 - Site Plan showing existing site conditions Figure 4- Site Plan showing soil,water, and air sampling locations iAPPENDICES Appendix A- Proposed Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Appendix B - Soil Boring Logs Appendix C- Photograph Log Appendix D—U.S. EPA Freedom of Information Act(FOIA)Request and Response ' iii t � / \ s / LEGEND SMC TRAVERSE STATION O SB STONE BOUND / \ CONCRETE0 co BOUND O IP RON PIP • PK REBAR, NMR, SPIKE, BEANPOLE HUB & TACK EP/LP T ESCUTCHEON PIN/fLEAD PLUG FND FOUND N/F NOW OR FORMERLY / C — PROPERTY UNE SIDELINE / \ STONE WALL TREE LINE TUTEE (DIA s TYPE) \ - o BOULDER IETAMNG WALL 91T CCNC BITUMINOUS CONCRETE \ !:RAIN GRANITE EDGE OF WATER _ L24T OF WETLANDS 200 D RIVER FRONT AREA W • ,o ARD POST (BOlLA1D) \ �� \ ■ CONIC POST U7L 1 MIRE a 'JFp' UTILRY POLE o UP/LF UTILITY POLE/LKHT POLE Compost / O DMH DRAINMANHOLE \ Area \ MAP 7 PARCEL 42 ❑ Ce CATCH BASIN 2.43 ACRES R RIM I INVERT (�\ / •• CMP CORRUGATED METAL PPE \ RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE CIP CAST RON RPE \ /' • • PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE \ / \ O TM CELS GATE \ ' -- . . O TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE 200 Ft. River Front Area —� - O SMH wSE CTMC SHE O SMH SEVER MANHOLE TE \ �- . . . . �� _ . _ - _ \ /- - 'Q' HYD. HYDRANT -W- - WATER UNE - -S- .__ SEWER UNE -T- - TELEPHONE LINE -E- -_ ELECTRIC LLE -D- DRAIN LME \ -__'..- - -G- - GINS LIGE N/F x ELEV SPOT GRADE \ CITY OF SALEM - ----�� ----------- INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR MAP 7 PARCEL 68 / \ 9.20 ACRES _ —200— INDEX CONTOUR \ / -.- Z SMC STA /6 11t ,� • PK �.�90 - r r r . , 5.T --------------------------------______-_-_ - - �� '-/.r- rr%s• wr p2O N 10950.85 E 99112.76 _ _ 1 ® WF r„ EtEv.92.2o FEET Location Legend: 'J'•ra 1222 2222 2222--- --'-- ---- SoilBoring _ - .'1 a rr, ,rr : . � WF A23 WATER - - ,;- _ gi` !' "¢ *18 - Soil Boring / Monitoring Well REBAR. ,' �\` -----------------____--- - I17 _///� \ �"' END W/BP WITNESS _ _ ''I�'' ------- ✓� Surface Water Sampling WF #14 MAP 7 PARCEL 66 ';,W� _ "_'-: -- _�:• b `\ t \ WF p15 '' 10.2 ACRES _ 6 -i ' • •: •_,�•J'�• '\ 11`t 11 1•---- ■-_ fEiPEsoS " �` ® - Sediment Sampling b13yy '-!_ -/ \ •-d•" ®®WF M10 1`r\r` \\t ', C�RG f GRAN RLEtr Ai 1 rSampling fEK - _-___;- ' _ r_ r r' ' '' - - g STIR' ` \ TIR CTE t i r� �r+ i +'' ,' \ ® • .�'. `' � V7 TT }TURE .-•N- FOREST RIVER . . ��. �.aWr= -___ MW-4d r' 1 MW-5 r ;, �, i i•t'' `' ,` r'I�'� ;I +i', ''%%' - _ SFA EI y� 65' Groundwater Contour Line -= 8-203 ' Mw-45 - '�i09 i I ,' E;!q'5 E7 r rr , I+, r t , I r „ 41, N/F SMC STA �I ' ,' ELE,v.67.501FE\ET \ , 1 r r + 1 ROYAL ORDER OF MOOSE ®. _ SET ''• --- ' 1 ' ` . + ' ' 1 I r + I , ,r ' MAP PARCEL E"99- BIT CONIC SMC STA #4 WF p5 ,, .� ,'- W-`3 ELEV66.555.5 0 FEET PK 10108&9r-rr/',rrSET ' ________________ __ BIT CONIC 1 r I . 1 X11111 E 99467.9 ELEV=60.4 T :.�„.,\ •, / I•r,1T+1I1 L�,j,�T 1 I'+ 1'I/IIIrI•I'-13--Y20213--Y202 2�2 . , , I r ,'� r' ,1�`•:-\�-,.\-,222 ® �\♦\�„\\`\`\�\'\\\�\�,\� _ . I,,,,1,', ++,, +I ,I,'�, \I\/,I/\t r,Ir l/rI'l,I;r'I/IrI II;rI 11 r,1I,/,I/+„�/j>11''I11 'I P SB/DN WF EXIST 200 Ft. River Front AreaStAGK \ I,II I , I ,1,1 '' rIrlr -'?J� , I ,, , rl , Irl ' X11 Z�i SETA /1 INER/`TO PK PK SET - -- - /•., L1 , +r 11 ' 11`+ I ' , , ---i �/ ` n11j1, INC J,, ,• _i r, lr Ir ` al N19283.85 \ RENT .`II ,. ;r r I r c`Yil E 99283.86 I l , • ' ,� r , , ' ' ' �'/' ` \�I cup IIr 1 I r 4 ' ELEV=100.00 FEET OI B-2 \ ` E•S51NG / x I ,' r' / r r r + y'I , Irl, 1 , 1 , 11 1 r , .rr • `, \:i� � 1 ilii `� I� � i � 1 r _ '}, _ 1 .: ate 1 /'• ` \ AfIE�` `1 ..'+ „ _ '/'� '/ ° I AP CyERW� Nrg.T cON, B-4 _ O. B-S I IR151 I ”' I - F"'1` '' ,' r . `` , \ •__ r+' r='r _ 3'S STEEL PIPE?p?`` -I r \ , � ;; I• BIT CONIC BLDG I , \`, B-jam • / \ r L 6•,t1RAIN GR',A rE �- LPB SCALE r r �- �` 7 . I r ® `\ "GONG PAD h R-1 I _�� \ �y x�- ._a.- 1311 CONIC .URB O. _ _-"` \ -2 8-201 Fe �L pF —�x {.w 'ro pp 4 I 7PMl._ • ��- •.io .,, , i ` \\ OWNER -SR _ T- UN Fp - -- ` - ” 'I pain I W \ MAP PARCEL -- _ ' NET+T p7 - . • • - -'F=- ie 69 ii'sz�hD BOOK _ PAGE SMC STA /3 - UP/LP I.".94 ,/ I.69Ja 1 PK SET ,3 \ ,• . - _NET+T , w PPE s LE - — N 101194.04 llllft i ` r CO t E 99680.94 4312 ELEV.64.65 FEET �� Q CB- _ EBIR _ 18-1 - -.. - ��— L - �- - SMCPK SETA /2 FNDN 101734.19 E 99514.61 \ ELEV-102.88 FEET MAP 7 PARCEL 69 5.59 ACRES DRAWN BY: 313 Norwood Pork South SCALE: MJz J �J [ JVJQ Gr011p, lC Norwood.MA 02062 Transfer Station X06 ozo3/ 781.255.1982 Tax:781.255.1974 DEPT. CHECK: E n g l n e e r S • Scientists - P I a n n e r S Boston. MA-Lincoln,RI-New Loddon,CT FILE NO. x I e on*. email:BETAOBETA-inc.Com Site Plan with Sampling Locations JMS ' 1 "=50' PLOT DATE March 7, 7.005 PRQ1. CHECK: SHEET Figure 1 NUMBER DATE MADE BY CHECKED E3Y REVISIONS DESCRIPTION SMS Salem, MA UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR CHANGED BY REPRODUCTION -1 - I �D► 'CII .v Solid AssessmentPriority Resources Map RR44 � � S 1.� 1. � ;: � _t � ,k � , I III SL 0 s ` L 0 D - k - .� SL007)<. 1 �1� 7 .W4 CO 0b7 fib, 003 1 i I - _ � t3 s s t. � � � � � �� . 3o.aoa n A �1 �Oh1030.�'7 -C �. ,: �<. �y .• � loop.-' yyT� � � �I� 1 �, Salem Lynn 1 coaa3D l72 � 6Vdep Scale 1:50000 s LO(Y703 . 4 _ MILES �� r - 2 { a 3�, -0071:OOn �,L' o rz 2 : BETA�- Group, Inch Engineers.Scientists.Planners - :.\ �\ 9• :- } `. ��1�Ir J -_ I- � .008-- t N e oos •�,-rQ �' seAs�l4 s s8�aas , s v 12 and 1 Mlle Landfill Buffer I n9 9 Umfte ens Access, Hh Ae Non PaEmial Ddnld Water Source Area Medium Meld � ��•, Lnnit¢d AeceaeH hwa - NonPatentlelDnnld Water Source Area High y � 9: AU 0�2 F, iy D25 Dos: 9. 17:1 Potentially PradueMre Medium Yield Aquner Other Numb red Highway r Jr�� 1 L t l_'15� SLO'r58 CQB: y;M101 8003 y _ � � •j �. 00�_ }{ I �� -_ / '- S 00 8003 -. Major Read•Connector { 29.OQ'L'1 r' l 0 LQ 8009 L� 8 SL0 3 X6168 003. �. Potentially Productive High Yield Aquger _ 0101 t> ,, : ' ' +SLp 8 0168.003 MID 0168003 _ - Municipal Boundary :'1 10211,- t A. 229.002 ,-r' m. . .,d, . r', S �� iSLO 81x09 5 0258 aM14 8 EPA Dominated bola Sswsa Aquifer County Boundary 1 _ T .r.� _'I. �� \ `�- 8 q - - -C-k-� .. SLO'2� ";`, �. 'SL8. "2g(g1a5�g:Wq Treln, - - �" f 8.)07 1 fl248:009'SL 8.009.: \\ DEP Approved Wellhead PmEcdon Area(Zone II) - _ - - �\ / L02�8.009 ""' Pipeline- L0258.OaJ' Olg8 W3 DEP Interim Wellhead Protection Area Q WPA) _ _ _ ' Aqueduct � - r . SLj08258009 0163b03 ` 0168.01)3` _ SL0259.009'�. 168. 3 01680D3 - ,.,.: t yIIS Public Surface Water Supply Protection Area(Zone A) Major Drainage Bealn. �'"(I ] - _ �I� V r 1 /. Lam .+ - 0 3 M10168 00 - - _- 4 f}J. . iii��111"' \'r S 53 8 S[A258.006 USGSlJuadrangle Bcun }f I;I" \ - 8.001 F } 0 8.(106 "`- Lake Pond Stream or other Fresh Water Feature ]- t - -'t '-'3\` ) N - 4.--'y , :u ., Y a,�;.:_ 8.00is, s s.006 r _ I. SLO'e�3 I�$ _. .ru. � e ^- 1 SCO258_010 68 003 ' Bay Estuary or Diner Sad Water FeaWre" - \ _ 1 - `; , �� I III' � 129 �n °\ i;Y•t'Y 1 I.I�-. Fresh Water Nan-Forested tNetland - \ .� _ a�a�:"r -I" # ''.yP.)tb r tl If - S�TE lr. 71 F • I. 258 J-5 y 3 0045 E ' - .1�.�I _ .a06 402 58 i-. San water wetland ., 1 " z. � ., �� X8.001 �' r- I S � zSE. 0258. 'f _ I NH for Osegg-200voth e MA Wetlands giros of R m Wildlife: �.i. f fls- t—,` 1 I . `-:?�� .006 regulattona(31a cMR1o) x.5 �� yl'.;.• "� 1 ` r'sf. �� L - , ii1 ll \ cl - Ili' ProEcta end Recreational Open Space p + - {, �ir y : SLS29 Aram at Critical Environmental Concern V� Solid Waste Landfill u 2 v - •ty' e . sil �I � �� 0291.001 Public Surface Water Supply m .,..n .n. ` 3 fid , \ r" 0291,001 o o . , , . „ { FZYunveoFnc•w _ - , 0291.00 K,11! - D E 9 YI R O Na ENIAL -eMOtONM &MFMIM � 7 - {rn/I {, � r ��' S 1 029. 91 0 ® Community Public Water Supply-Surface Water " "o r s e r a n _ lLi l l �' +; ,J 1 w'�I, SL .. � ." g ///►►► ; ' Community Public Water Supply•Groundtveter +�HN+� - �,. * �DL0163. T ,� aSL0291 ._> eegrookr � Z.'Ql 001, _ 'TR 3.0 � SL0291:001 InJmm{miu{ x t LO _ - 3. r Non Community Public Wmee Supply °t� 163 � 1 5 [•[ZO 5 - --"- - Ftuxh.au Fmvnmo�reyFeJ,mnata ngm'n-mal �`' Figure 2 NHESP 1808-2001 MA Carrlilled Vernal Pool - - {J - - 0'y b 9 `1 IJ�. S 163. ,{¢cihia . 1 1 1 1 1 Group,Inc. ' Engineers • Scientists • Planners ' 315 Norwood Park South,Norwood,MA 02062 Original Plans Unavailable Included is the best fitting version Original Plans can be found at the DEP ' Northeast Regional Office in Wilmington 1 1 � � � � � i � � � — m rc 6 �" N !' M J � Q Q �r 1 � I ' 1.0 Executive Summary ' BETA Engineering, Inc. has completed an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) of the Salem Landfill and Transfer Station located at 12 Swampscott Road in Salem, ' Massachusetts. This work was performed for Mr. Robert George of Northside Carting, Inc. The purpose of this assessment was to complete landfill closure requirements pursuant to 310 CMR 19.140(4)(a). ' The ISA involved a review of available information on the landfill, including reports and records on file with the Salem Engineering, Public Works, Fire Prevention, and Assessing Departments, the Salem Board of Health, the Salem Public Library, the Essex County Registry of Deeds, and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Division of Solid Waste ' Management, Northeast Regional office in Wilmington, Massachusetts. Additional background information was provided by published geologic and hydrologic data of the region, and geographic data contained in the Massachusetts ' Geographic Information System (Mass GIS) at, the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs in Boston, Massachusetts. ' As a means of completing the reporting requirements which are necessary for final closure by DEP of the Salem landfill, BETA has prepared this report to be submitted to the DEP, as fulfillment of both the assessment requirements pursuant ' to 310 CMR 19.150; and as partial fulfillment of the closure requirements, pursuant to 310 CMR 19.140. ' The ISA is presented in the following format, in conjunction with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)Outline for Site Assessment: ' Section 1.0 — Executive Summary gives a general discussion on the way the ISA is presented and formatted. ' Section 2.0—Introduction gives a general discussion of the landfill, the ISA and the reasons the ISA was conducted. ' Section 3.0 — Background Information presents the site assessment/landfill closure process, gives a general description of the landfill, along with a history ' and regulatory status of the landfill. In addition, general physical features and adjacent land uses are discussed. ' Section 4.0 —Historical Research presents potential haulers that disposed waste at the landfill, industries historically located in town, the solid waste stream, and amounts of refuse generated. Additionally, historic information such as aerial tphotographs are reviewed. ' Initial Site Assessment 1 Salem,MA ; Section 5.0 — Literature/Data Search reviews and summarizes existing reports and data on the landfill and adjacent properties. Previous groundwater and site studies, as well as previous landfill operational plans are discussed. This includes ' EPA, DEP and town file review, regulatory status reports, and closure plan implementation. Discussions with past and present site workers who were interviewed are also presented. Potential sensitive receptors are identified with ' regard to environmental and public health. ' Section 6.0 — Site Description reviews available data on local and regional surficial geology, bedrock geology, and hydrology. This includes information from USGS, the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and soil borings and well logs ' conducted on the site. Additionally, available maps of gurficial geology and bedrock geology are discussed. ' Section 7.0—Site Visit presents a general condition of the landfill based upon site investigations and current aerial photography. This includes a discussion of the surface/cap, direction of surface water run-off and location and condition of all groundwater and air monitoring devices. Evidence of leachate breakouts, landfill gas emissions and the condition of nearby surface water and wetlands are discussed. Finally, a discussion of current landfill operation procedures, site ' accessibility, and adjacent property use are presented. Section 8.0 — Mapping presents a discussion of the base mapping system ' compiled for the Salem landfill under the ISA. Section 9.0—Field Screening discusses available field screening and geophysical ' mapping methods available, and. their applicability/usefulness at the Salem landfill. Section 10.0 — Conclusions presents conclusions pertaining to the Manomet landfill,based upon data of previous sections. ' Section 11.0 — Recommendations presents recommendations regarding the Salem landfill, the ISA and the CSA,based upon conclusions in Section 10.0. ' Based upon the results of the ISA, a proposed scope of work for the Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) was developed. The proposed CSA scope ' of work includes a groundwater and surface water sampling program, well location recommendations and proposed sampling and analysis procedures. Additionally, other issues to be addressed in the CSA are discussed. The ' proposed scope of work for the CSA is included in Appendix A. ' Initial Site Assessment 2 Salem,MA ' 2.0 Introduction BETA Engineering, Inc., under contract with Northside Carting, Inc. (NCI), has ' completed an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) of the Salem Landfill and Transfer Station (the site), located at 12 Swampscott Road in Salem, MA. A USGS Site ' Locus Map is included as Figure 1, and a Solid Waste Assessment Priority Resources Map is included as Figure 2. The site is located near the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland ' Avenue, in the southwestern portion of Salem, and consists of approximately 357,192 square feet of land, or f8..20 acres: According to the Essex County Registry Yof Deeds the property has beeniowned b h—Ci.n-ofSaem-sine` at-least,t 1 � The landfill/incinerator/transfer station was operated by the City of Salem from opening in 1963 through September 1994, and the landfill/transfer station has 'u^ been operated by NCI since September 1994. The incinerator building, located on ' the northeastern portion of the site, was originally constructed in 1950, with an area of approximately 6,052 square feet. A portion of the incinerator building was converted to the current transfer station in 1975. The landfill portion of the site is ' located on the eastern portion of the property. A composting area is located on the southwestem portion of the property, and is separated from the landfill/transfer station portion of the property by the Forest River. A roadway ' was built over a portion of the Forest River by the City of Salem to connect the two portions of the property sometime in 1969 or 1970. ' This report was prepared in accordance with the DEP outline for the completion of an ISA. In accordance with this outline, available records of the landfill at the ' various offices of the City of Salem, the Massachusetts DEP Northeast Region in Wilmington, MA. Additionally, transfer station staff were interviewed regarding current and previous landfill operations. ' A lack of historical information suggests that previous site investigations have not been conducted for the Salem landfill property. ' This assessment reviews available information including previous conclusions, recommendations, and operational plans and studies of the landfill and transfer ' station/former incinerator. Previous environmental assessment and groundwater, surface water;soil, and sediment analysis of the Forest River were not identified during our investigation. Conclusions and recommendations of this ISA are ' presented in Sections 10.0 and 11.0. ' Initial Site Assessment V 3 Salem,MA ; _1 e o r C9 \\ 1 a k V N { �l' SITE _ QY`gy�� r� �J \("^� pVe� ~` iQ/ �I `?+' >'r'� JW� � \� 'r / \`��f'�`��~�~t~' � / �'/ % �jf) '• DEN t IE J ( 1 21 1 Q 1 Files Site Locus Map ' Inner ring represents 500 foot radius Salem Landfill Figure 1 Outer ring represents one mile radius 32 Swampscott Road MEQ i3ETAGroup,Inc. Salem I , Engineers•Scientists•Planners t3.0 Background Information ' A. SITE ASSESSMENT/LANDFILL CLOSURE Prior to submittal of a landfill Closure/Post Closure Plan for the Salem Landfill, an assessment must be made. The assessment consists of three phases: the ISA, the CSA and the Corrective Action Alternatives Analysis (CAAA), if deemed necessary. The ISA is the first phase. Generally, the ISA and CSA are completed ' prior to landfill closure. The purpose of the ISA is to determine the extent, if any, of adverse environmental impacts on the environment due to the operation of the landfill. The scope of the ISA must be acceptable to DEP. It includes a general site history and description, a review of any previous environmental and groundwater quality ' monitoring, available landfill studies, local surface water and receiving water descriptions and"any other data the DEP deems necessary." ' The results and data of the ISA and input from DEP determine whether further environmental study is needed. If so, a scope of work for a CSA will be developed during the ISA tasks. ' Based upon discussions with DEP and a lack of previous studies, it is anticipated ' that a CSA, or Phase II,will be necessary for the Salem landfill. The scope of the CSA will reflect the information and recommendations contained in the ISA. ' B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Salem landfill is located on the northwest side of Swampscott Road. It is ' approximately two miles southwest of the center of Salem. The landfill is located on a lot of land designated as Map 7, Lot 68, consisting of 357,192 square feet, or approximately 8.20 acres, according to the Salem Assessors Department. tThe landfill is located on the border of the Lynn and Salem U.S. Geological Survey 7.5' topographic quadrangle maps. The landfill is located on both sides of the Forest River, a stream that flows northeast to southwest into a pond located to the south of the landfill. Bedrock outcroppings are obvious to the north, east, and west of the landfill. The City of Salem currently owns the Salem Landfill, and the site is operated by NCI. According to the Essex County Registry of Deeds, the City has owned the ' landfill property since at least 1928. The main portion of the landfill is located on the eastern portion of the property. In addition to the main portion of the landfill, an area reserved for compost yard waste exists on the southwestern portion of the site. The current transfer station/former incinerator building, scale house, and work trailer currently exist on the site, along with various solid waste storage ' trailers and roll-off containers. Initial Site Assessment 6 Salem,MA ; i Swampscott Road borders the landfill to the northeast, followed by a private ' junkyard located across Swampscott Road, perched approximately 50 feet above grade from the landfill. A Volvo dealership is located approximately 300 feet northeast of the landfill, at the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland Avenue (Route 107). Tony Lena Sandwich Shop, Royal Order of Moose Lodge No. 218, a medical building, a medical supplies building, and a Honda dealership all border the landfill to the north and west. A pond is located approximately 200 feet to the southwest of the landfill. A self storage facility and Gold's Gym border ' the landfill to the south. A residential townhouse community is located approximately 200 feet to the southeast of the landfill, perched approximately 60 feet above the grade of the landfill. The'City of Salem, NCI, and the DEP have entered into an Administrative Consent Order (ACO). The purpose of the ACO is to complete the assessment and closure/capping of the landfill in accordance with 310 CMR 19.00, the Massachusetts Solid Waste Regulations. ' C. SITE HISTORY AND PAST OPERATIONAL PLANS Site History ' According to available information, the site operated as a solid waste incinerator beginning in approximately 1963. According to Mr. Stanley Bornstein, Engineer ' for the City of Salem, the incinerator broke down around 1968, was not repaired, and did not operate any longer. The site has been used as a solid waste transfer ' station since 1975. According to DEP .documentation, the incinerating and landfilling operations on the property ceased in 1975, with the conditional approval for the conversion of the solid waste incinerator building to a solid waste ' transfer station. At that point, the City of Salem was required to cap the landfill and notify the DEP when the cap was completed. However, the cap was not completed, and no record of capping or closure is on file at the DEP. Based on soil borings conducted by BETA, there are nearly 30 feet of burned refuse ash materials in the deepest part of the landfill. BETA visited the Salem Public Library to research historical city directories for current and historical businesses and occupants within the vicinity of the site. BETA reviewed directories for the years 1920, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1946, 1952, 1957, 1963, 1970, 1977, 1983, 1986, 1991, and 1999. The Salem landfill/transfer station appeared in directories from 1963, 1970, and 1977 as Salem Municipal Incinerator, in the directories from 1986 and 1991 as Salem Solid Waste Transfer ' Station, and in the directory from 1999 as Salem Environmental Company and Transfer Station. ' Initial Site Assessment 7 Salem,MA i � � ® � � � tr � � � � � � � � r r � { � �� r ' Past Operational Practices A Site Plan with boring logs was prepared by J.L. Hayden Associates of Boston, MA in 1961 for the new incinerator. The plan showed existing contours of the landfill property between 68 and 120 feet NGVD. Currently, areas in the center of the landfill are at approximately 80 feet in elevation NGVD. There are no landfill operation plans or proposed closure plans on file with either ' the City of Salem or the DEP. Therefore, closure of the landfill will need to be conducted in accordance with current engineering and regulatory design standards,but will not reference any previous plans or proposed elevations. ' D. ON-SITE FACILITIES The current solid waste transfer station building was originally constructed in 1963 as a solid waste incinerator building. The use of the building was converted to the current transfer station in 1975. According to the Salem Assessors ' Department, the building totals approximately 6,052 square feet. Electrical service is provided to the transfer station building via overhead lines. There is an overhead power line and easement along the northeastern border of the property, along Swampscott Road. A set of three pole-mounted transformers are located to the north of the building. Water service is not provided to the building, though a hose is connected to a curbside hydrant and is used for wetting/dust control/cleaning purposes. A small scale house building and a personnel trailer are the only other structures located on the property. A numbei of trailers and roll-off containers are located around the landfill and transfer station portions of the site, used for temporary ' storage of solid waste. According to Mr. Robert George, owner of NCI, only construction and demolition debris and wood are currently accepted at the transfer station. E. SITE STATUS/CHRONOLOGY ' On June 4, 1994 the Salem Transfer Station received a Permit by Rule from the DEP, granting the continued operation of the transfer station. The permit cited a previous approval by the"Department", dated September 9, 1975, to-receive-up-to, ' l00=tons-of waste-per_day. ' Initial Site Assessment 8 Salem,MA ; tele Vpe-ra��erra � v to 6z iI' ; l 1 1 _. 1 ' On December 10, 1999 the DEP issued a Notice of Non-compliance (NON) to NCI (the operator-referred to in the NON as Salem Environmental Company) and the City of Salem (the owner). The NON was issued based on observations made ' during a September 22, 1999 inspection of the facility. Violations noted during the inspection were as follows: ' • The facility-layout had:been-mod.fled,—om-the_P.ermit`by-Rule, including a modification of grades and waste handling and storage areas, without DEP approval MAW ' • Processed compost and solid waste materials, including wood waste, ope✓a loryial demolition debris, and metal, were being stored outside of containers, in a V�oj a4/o/7 a manner that hindered movement about the facility. Additionally, the ' facility=had-not been_approved-for_4amsting_or compost-storage. • Surface grades had been modified using solid waste materials without a Beneficial Use Determination(BUD) from the DEP. • Solid=waste materials=were=thought�to3havesbeen=used=to=construct'a roadway=across-the=Forest=River, which traverses the property. • Compost and demolition debris were being stored at the site within an apparent Wetlands Buffer Zone without filing a Determination of Applicability or Notice of Intent with the local conservation commission. 1 • Solid waste and recyclable materials appeared to be stored at the site for over 60 days. • Daily waste logs were not being maintained at the facility. NCI responded to the NON by taking the following actions: • January 6, 2000-submitted Waste Ban Plan to DEP, indicating that only ' construction debris was accepted at the facility. • January 17, 2000-submitted request for Determination of Applicability to the Salem Conservation Commission and the DEP. • January 26, 2000-retained BETA as consultant for environmental issues related to the landfill/transfer station. • February 16, 2000-submitted 1999 Annual Report of waste. • July 27, 2000-filed Order of Conditions, Massachusetts Wetlands ' Protection Act with the Essex County Registry of Deeds • April 19, 2001-filed Application for Modification of a Large Handling Facility to DEP. • May 15, 2001-submitted Leaf and Yard Waste Composting Registration Form to DEP. On February 29, 2000, the DEP performed a re-inspection of the property, and found that the composting operation was being operated suitably. It was during this visit that the DEP became aware that the composting operation was located on an ash landfill. Prior to this inspection, the DEP had been unaware of the ' landfill. The DEP determined that regrading of the landfill area in preparation for conducting the composting operation required excavating into the landfill area, which had not been approved by the Department. ' Initial Site Assessment 9 Salem,MA ; _ _ t t,�o�1-Yt�v e c� �,jta �a�ttnrS , 1 I t 1 1 1 On May 10, 2000, the DEP received a complaint regarding the operation of the facility. The DEP further reviewed existing plans for the facility, and determined ' that the facility had been approved only for waste to be placed directly into the compactor units located within the modified incinerator building. Outside processing=of-ma (:rials=had=not�been_approved=by-the=DEP—�gemut. 1 On May 17, 2000, the DEP again re-inspected the facility. During this inspection, the DEP notified NCI that the facility was only permitted to place waste directly ' into the compactor units, and was not approved for "open-air sorting of recyclables from C&D." The DEP held an enforcement conference on July 26, 2000 with representatives from NCI and the City of Salem to discuss issues and alleged violations at the facility, in an effort to bring the facility back into compliance with DEP standards. On January 9, 2001, a draft version of an Administrative Consent Order with Penalty (ACOP) was sent to both NCI and the City. The draft ACOP listed the Coe)4 mdeJ DEP actions described in the paragraphs above. The DEP re-inspected the facility Vt ca led'eow`5 on January 25, 2001, and found the following continued alleged violations: • Waste was being deposited outside the transfer station,not directly into the compacting bins as approved by the DEP. • A portion of the landfill had been cut/excavated to construct a ramp for solid waste containers,modifying the mode of operation at the facility. • Signage at the facility was lacking, not indicating hours of operation or limitations on waste dumping. The front gate appeared inoperable. ' • The facility was not adequately screened or fenced. • Routine maintenance at the facility was lacking, and debris was observed on the ground. The access driveway was not paved. • The composting operation was not being managed properly, with bulky wooden materials such as logs, branches, and Christmas trees co-mingled into the stockpile. The stockpile was excessive and was not windrowed. ' • Records of daily tonnage and other information was not available on site. • Seven roll-off containers full of waste were being stored on-site. • DPW roadway materials were being stockpiled on-site. • C&D debris was deposited on the ground behind the transfer station. A follow-up enforcement conference was held on February 22, 2001, and the alleged violations at the facility were discussed. The parties also discussed the steps to be taken to bring the facility back into compliance, the penalty owed for the violations, and the execution of the ACOP. 1 Initial Site Assessment 10 Salem,MA ; Negotiations between the DEP, NCI, and the City of Salem regarding responsibility, penalty, and actions took place between February 2001 and March 2002. A final version of the ACOP was issued by the DEP on March 11, 2002, with the penalty for the vanousxviolationsibeing=dividedabetween:NGI and:the ;City_ofSal=,based=on_responsibility. F. PHYSICAL FEATURES 1 Topography in the area of the landfill slopes to the southwest, toward the Forest River and associated wetlands. Topography on the southwestern portion of the property slopes to the southeast, also towards the River. Generally, properties located to the north/northeast of the landfill are considered upgradient from the site, and properties to the south are considered downgradient. The Forest River appears to form a drainage divide for areas east and west of the River. The (un-named) pond, located to the south of the landfill, is associated with the Forest River, which traverses the property from northwest to southeast. The river ' flows beneath a portion of the property, which was built up over the River to connect the eastern and southwestern portions of the property. Some refuse was observed in the river at the time of BETA'S site visit. Aerial photographs from ' 1938 have shown that the pond was not present at the location at that time, and is possibly man-made, or has been formed by man-made changes in the local topography. ' The Salem landfill is located in an area of steep slopes and bedrock outcroppings. According to the USGS Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey for Essex County, MA (Southern Part), soils underlying the landfill are composed of the Chatfield- Hollis-rock outcrop complex. This complex consists of well-drained, moderately deep Chatfield soils; somewhat excessively drained, shallow Hollis soils; and exposed bedrock, with slopes ranging from 15 to 35 percent. Soils within this complex generally have a surface layer of dark gray-brown fine sandy loam, 1 approximately one to three inches thick. The subsurface soils are composed of a dark brown-yellowish sandy loam, containing some gravel. Bedrock is estimated between 18 and 34 inches below grade. Onsite soil borings performed by J.L. Hayden Associates Inc. in 1961, prior to construction of the original incinerator building, identified sandy loams, yellow- dark gray-brown in color, with some gravel, and refusal between two and eight feet below grade. These findings are consistent with the Soil Survey conducted by the USGS. Bedrock underlying the Salem landfill is located within the Milford-Dedham Zone, consisting of the Diorite and Gabbro (Proterozoic Z) complex. This complex consists of diorite and gabbro, subordinate metavolcanic rocks, and intrusive granite and granodiorite. Initial Site Assessment 11 Salem,MA ; ' G. ABUTING PROPERTY OWNERS AND LAND USES Land use in the vicinity of the landfill consists mainly of commercial use, with ' some residential use and open space. ' Swampscott Road borders the landfill to the northeast, followed by a private junkyard located across Swampscott Road, perched approximately 50 feet above grade from the landfill. Stutz Volvo dealership is located approximately 300 feet ' northeast of the landfill, at the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland Avenue (Route 107). The Tony Lena Sandwich Shop, Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 218, a medical building, a medical supplies building, and Salem Honda ' dealership all border the landfill to the north and west. Residential properties are located approximately 300 feet southwest of the landfill. A pond is located approximately 200 feet to the south/southwest of the landfill. A self storage ' facility and Gold's Gym border the landfill to the south. A residential townhouse community is located approximately 200 feet to the southeast, perched approximately 60 feet above the grade of the landfill. 1 The following table provides current local businesses, along with their addresses, distance, direction, and inferred hydrogeologic proximity to the landfill property. 1 Approximate Inferred Hydrogeologic Business Address Distance from Direction Proximity ' Loyal Order of Landfill Moose#218 319 Highland Abutting North Upgradient Tony Lena's 313 Highland Abutting North Upgradient Sandwiches Stutz Volvo 311 Highland 300 feet Northeast Upgradient Puritan Medical 331 Highland Abutting Northwest Upgradient Center Medical 335 Highland 300 feet Northwest Upgradient ' Supplies Salem Honda 329 Highland Abutting Northwest Upgradient Residential Cedar Road Abutting West Crossgradient Properties Gold's Gym 38 Swampscott Abutting South Dowagnidient Self Storage Swampscott Abutting South Downgmdient Facility Road Residential Townhouse First Street 200 feet Southeast Crossgradient Community ' BETA has conducted previous environmental site assessments (ESAs) in the vicinity of the landfill, and gathered information regarding the history and uses of ' nearby businesses and properties. Initial Site Assessment 12 Salem,MA ; Salem Honda, listed at 347 Highland Avenue in a previous BETA report, is listed as a DEP release disposal site, for the release of#2 fuel oil during the closure of a #2 fuel oil UST. A Limited Removal Action (LRA) was conducted. Confirmatory soil sampling indicated the contamination had been removed, though concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were detected up to ' 4,270 parts per million (ppm) in soil samples collected below 15 feet. A Class A- 2 Response Action Outcome(RAO) was achieved for the release, indicating that a remediation to background levels was technologically feasible, but not ' economically viable. Information in the RAO stated that there was no evidence of groundwater contamination at the property. ' A car wash, located on the Salem Honda property, was listed on the Massachusetts state spills database in 1992, with regard to a release of petroleum products into the septic system. TPH was originally detected in a soil sample collected from the septic leaching field. A soil and groundwater investigation was conducted. Concentrations of TPH were detected up to 3,900 ppm in soils. Concentrations of groundwater were detected below drinking water standards. ' The septic system and contaminated soil were removed in 1993, to eliminate the source of the contamination. An RAO, along with an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL)were filed for the release. City Directory Research ' BETA visited the Salem Public Library to research historical city directories for current and historical businesses and occupants within the vicinity of the site. BETA reviewed directories for the years 1920, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1946, 1952, 1957, 1963, 1970, 1977, 1983, 1986, 1991, and 1999. The Salem landfill/transfer station appeared in directories from 1963, 1970, and 1977 as Salem Municipal ' Incinerator, in the directories from 1986 and 1991 as Salem Solid Waste Transfer Station, and in the directory from 1999 as Salem Environmental Company and Transfer Station. ' The Loyal Order of Moose Lodge # 218 appeared in directories back to 1963 at 319 Highland Avenue, and the location was formerly occupied by DePietro's ' Restaurant in 1957 and Camille Cesarone-landscape gardener in 1952. Tony Lena's Sandwich Shop was listed at 313 Highland in directories dating back to 1991, and was previously listed as Dick's Donuts and The Coffee Shop. The address of 313 Highland was also listed as Suburban Oil Company in directories from 1957 and 1963. Stutz Volvo is listed at 311 and 305 Highland back to 1982, and as Plaisted Foreign Motors in 1970 and 1977. Spence welding was also listed at 305 ' Highland in directories from 1977 through 1991, and Doyle Gulf Service is listed at 305 Highland in the directory from 1963. Initial Site Assessment 13 Salem,MA CRUM Salem Honda is listed at 329 Highland in directories dating back to 1986, and was previously listed as North Shore Toyota in 1977 and 1982. The medical center/medical supply buildings at 331, 333, and 335 Highland are listed in ' directories back to 1986. Gold's Gym and North Shore Self Storage are listed on Swampscott Road in directories from 1999 and 1991. An address of 000 Highland Ave. is listed in 1952 as Eastern Tank and Equipment, in 1946 as Archibald and Sargent Oil Storage, in 1940 as George Viel ' gas station. Also, directories from 1930 and 1935 list Murphy's Filling Station, Highland Ave. Service Station, and 199 Battery D&F Artillery Stable at the intersection of Highland Ave. and Swampscott Road, without specific numbered ' addresses. The directory from 1920 lists residential properties in the vicinity. 1 ' Initial Site Assessment 14 Salem,MA ; ' 4.0 Historical Research ' A. SOLID WASTE HAULERS Numerous haulers have transported solid waste to the Salem landfill and transfer ' station since incineration and landfilling operations began in 1963. Information regarding historical solid waste haulers was not available. ' Currently, most waste brought to the transfer station is hauled by NCI and various commercial haulers. Small commercial and private entities routinely haul construction and demolition (C&D) debris, including wood, furniture, and building materials to the transfer station. Residents of Salem are allowed to dump various yard waste composting materials, ' including leaves, grass cuttings, and branches, to the site. This material is regularly transported by personnel on the site to the composting piles on the southwestern portion of the property. B. WASTE STREAMS AND QUANTITIES ' General ' Prior to NCI, waste was transported to the transfer station by residents of Salem. The site was operated by the City of Salem. Waste between 1963 and 1994 consisted largely of household and commercial trash, or Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). For several years starting in 1963, the waste was combusted in the incinerator, until a mechanical failure shut down the incinerator. It appears that no waste was accepted at the landfill from the time the incinerator broke down through 1975, when the building was converted to the current transfer station. Since 1975, MSW has been hauled to various landfills in the region. Starting in 1994,waste accepted at the transfer station has consisted of C&D debris. D n r I1995, 1998, and 1999 Annual Solid Waste Facility Reports , )�y ' BETA has obtained copies of the 1995, 1998, and 1999 Annual Solid Waste Facility Reports for the Salem Transfer Station. The reports provide a good idea of the types and amount of waste accepted at the transfer station. According to the 1999 report, materials accepted in 1999 included 672 tons of MSW, 2,000 tons of organics, 4,860 tons of wood, 10,620 tons of C&D debris, and 560 tons of DPW waste, for a total of 18,712 tons. Of the 18,712 ton total, 3,780 tons is listed to have been diverted/recycled, and 14,932 tons is listed to have been disposed of at disposal facilities in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. ' Initial Site Assessment 15 Salem,MA ; 1 r � 1 1 1 1 1 _____ 1 "� �� , �� 1 t - ��-re,y�m1 �Q�� 1 1 1 t t t t 1 Solid Waste Degradation ' The Salem landfill is an ash landfill. No evidence was found during the ISA that indicated MSW or unincinerated waste was disposed of at the site. Therefore, the degradation of waste is significantly complete when the ash is placed, and issues such as settlement and landfill gas/methane generation are much less significant than those of a solid waste or a C&D landfill. ' C) HISTORICAL MAPS AND PHOTOGRAPHS Sanborn Maps BETA visited the Salem Engineering Department to review historical Sanborn Maps covering the area of the landfill. According to the Salem Engineering Department's Sanborn Map collection,it appears that the area of the landfill is not included within boundaries of Salem Sanborn mapping. Generally, only downtown (urban) areas are covered by Sanborn Maps. Being located well ' outside the downtown portion of Salem, the landfill is not located within the Sanborn coverage area. ' Aerial Photographs BETA obtained aerial photographs from various sources for the years 1938, 1954, ' 1969, 1986, 1995, and 2001. The photographs are summarized below. ' 1938 Aerial Photograph In the 1938 aerial photograph, the site appears to be completely undeveloped. ' Swampscott Road borders the property to the northeast, and Highland Avenue is located approximately 200 feet to the northwest. The Forest River traverses the property from northwest to southeast. Two structures are apparent bordering the ' site to the north. Further north, across Highland Avenue, are several other structures. Several structures, which appear to be residential, are located approximately 500 feet to the west of the site. Areas to the east, southeast, and ' west appear to be undeveloped. 1954 Aerial Photograph In the 1954 aerial photograph, the site appears unchanged. The property bordering the site to the north appears to have been cleared. Commercial ' development appears to have taken place to the northeast of the site across Swampscott Road, and also to the north, northeast, and northwest across Highland Avenue. Areas to the southeast and southwest of the site appear essentially ' unchanged from the 1938 photograph. ' Initial Site Assessment 16 Salem,NM ; 1969 Aerial Photograph In the 1969 aerial photograph, the site has taken the form of a landfill. The solid ' waste incinerator building has been constructed on the northeastern portion of the property. Evidence of solid waste dumping appears on the southern portion of the ' property, bordering the Forest River. The abutting properties to the north have been improved with what appear to be the current Royal Order of Moose and Tony Lena Sandwich Shop buildings. Additional commercial development is ' evident to the northeast of the site, around the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland Avenue. Increased residential development is apparent to the west and southeast of the site. A small area to the south of the site appears to be cleared,but not yet developed. l�19781Aeria1 Photograph The 1978 aerial photograph is of a large scale and poor photo quality. Detail is difficult to discern. However, the site appears much as it did in the 1969 photograph. The-Forest—River traverses the-site;and'a pond has`form`ed_to the south-of-the-sit'e.l This pond appears to be associated with the flow of the river. The area on the southwestern portion of the property appears to have been cleared. ' Areas to the north, northeast, and west appear to be more heavily developed. Areas to the south and southeast appear to remain undeveloped. 1986 Aerial Photograph The 1986 aerial photograph is blurry, but the site appears similar to the 1978 ' photograph. Areas to the north, northeast, and west appear essentially unchanged from the 1978 photograph. A property abutting the site to the south appears to have been cleared, and an area approximately 1200 feet to the southeast of the site appears to have been commercially developed. d-995 Aerial Photograph In the 1995 aerial photograph, the landfill area appears to have a well defined ' bound f '�"� boundary. The_Eorest-Ricer-est -clearly=eviden to;tfie south=of the-site and=les—sem" euidentalong_the—northem-portion. Four long commercial units, identified during the site visit as Gold's Gym and three self storage buildings,have been developed to the south of the landfill. Also, a large commercial building has been constructed approximately 1500 feet to the east of the landfill. Other areas appear essentially unchanged from the 1986 photograph. Initial Site Assessment 17 Salem,MA ; s 2001 Aerial Photograph ' In the 2001 aerial photograph, the landfill area appears to be essentially unchanged from the 1995 photograph. An area approximately 300 feet to the southeast of the site has been developed into residential structures. The ' commercial building located approximately 1500 feet to the east of the site has been replaced with a different commercial building. Other areas appear essentially unchanged from the 1995 photograph. ' Initial Site Assessment 18 Salem,MA 5.0 Literature/Data Search A. GENERAL Files and literature were obtained and reviewed from the following Departments and Agencies. City of Salem ' Salem Assessors Department Salem Engineering Department Salem Department of Public Works Salem Conservation Commission Salem Board of Health Salem Public Library ' Commonwealth. of Mass. Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office Division of Solid Waste Mgmt. Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup ' 205 Lowell Street Wilmington,MA 01887 ' US EPA Region One(New England) One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (RAA) Boston, MA 02114-2023 ' B. PREVIOUS OPERATIONAL PLANS The Department of Environmental Protection, Northeast Regional Office and Salem Department of Public Works had portions of the following site plans on file: Plan Title Date of Drawing Engineer Site Plan=with Soil-� 1961 J:L,Hayden Associates) Boris s� March 15, Inc> Proposed 48"Culvert July 1969 City of Salem Engineering ' Site Plan and Access De artment Road Profile April 1975 CE Maguire, Inc. Initial Site Assessment 19 Salem,MA � /`_ r ' i J �. �� The following is a discussion regarding the content of each plan: Site Plan with Soil Borings-J.L. Hayden Associates, 1961 ' This plan appears to have been developed for the City of Salem prior to the ' construction of the solid waste incinerator building, and is the basis for BETA's inferred beginning to landfill operations in 1962 or 1963. I=this,plan,7J.-L`: Hayden-conducted-a-totalyo£seven soiliborings-and_prepared_a_plan.fdr thedessi ' of the-Salem=landfill-in'eluding=linildmg=plans-and_spgcifications—utilities; ,propos&dreont�s and�,access-roadways\ J.L. Hayden encountered refusal, assumed to be bedrock, at depths ranging from two to eight feet below ground surface. Soils identified included sandy loams, yellow-dark'gray-brown in color, with some gravel. ' Proposed 48" Culvert-City of Salem Engineering Department, 1969 BETA has obtained a portion of a plan showing a proposed 48" culvert to be constructed around/above the Forest River. The author of the plan is the City of Salem Engineering Department. This culvert has since been constructed, and connects the landfill (eastern) portion of the property with the compost area ' (southwestern) portion of the property. The Forest River flows through the culvert to a pond located approximately 200 feet southwest of the site. ' This plan is important historically, because it reveals that the culvert crossing of the Forest River was done in 1969 or 1970. This-crossing-included-the_filling.:of) AezFores ti River-rand-waterresources, which-under=current—regulaton_s.would,, ' require=wetlands=and waterways-permits through the DEPS Site Plan and Access Road Profile-CE Maguire, 1975 This plan was developed for the City of Salem for the conversion of the solid waste incinerator building to a solid waste transfer station. The plan is supplemented by specifications for the installation of various compacting equipment. In addition to the transfer station specifications, the site plan also ' illustrates the construction of an access road that wraps around the southern, eastern, and western sides of the landfill. The plan also illustrates areas to be graded, covered,, and seeded, intended as part of the transfer station conversion ' approval granted to the city. C. PREVIOUS GROUNDWATER/SITE STUDIES ' To the best of BETA's knowledge, no environmantal studies have been conducted for the landfill. ' Initial Site Assessment 20 Salem,MA ; .Q � � I` �� GLt /��` 0 ' tSeven-soil-borings-were-conducted by-J°L-j�Hayd4 nWifi I96iybuf it-appears=thatnoi isoi samples-were=submitted for-laboratory'analysis. The borings were apparently ' conducted for geotechnical and structural purposes for the construction of the incinerator building. To the best of BETA's knowledge, no other soil sampling has been conducted at the landfill property. D. RESULTS OF PREVIOUS STUDIES ' Since no soil analysis and no groundwater testing have been performed, there are no results to discuss in this section. ' E. SITE WORKERS INTERVIEWED Workers at the landfill/transfer station are employed by NCI,who began operating ' the facility in September 1994. Current workers at the landfill, including two to three equipment operators, a truck scale operator, and occasionally Mr. George, the owner,have knowledge daring back only as far as 1994. F. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/PATHWAYS ' The Site Plan with Soil Borings prepared by J.L. Hayden shows an underground water service line on the northeastern portion of the property, servicing the ' incinerator/transfer station building. At the time of BETA's site visit, a water hydrant was servicing the site, using a fire hose. The Hayden plan illustrated at - septic tank approximately 40 feet to the south of the building, with a leaching � � ' field running approximately 50 feet further south of the tank. v\ X' F - 6 The Hayden plan also illustrated an 1yAderground oil_nky'located adjacent to the ' northeastern side of the building, near the transformers. At the time of the site visit, BETA observed piping that appears to be associated with the/former/present BETA observed overhead electric power lines along Swampscott Road. An overhead line currently runs from the high power lines to a transformer substation, ' containing three pole-mounted transformers. Electricity is converted at the transformers to service the building. At the time of BETA's site visit, the personnel trailer located on the eastern side of the property was being hard wired ' for electricity to an overhead line. G. POTENTIAL SENSITIVE RECEPTORS ' Information regarding potential sensitive receptors was complied from aerial photography, Massachusetts Geographic Information Systems (Mass GIS) ' mapping data, and site research and reconnaissance by BETA personnel. ' Initial Site Assessment 21 Salem,MA �i 1 t 1 ' Potential Receptors within 500 feet of the Landfill The Salem Landfill is located in a mixed commercial, industrial, and residential area of Salem, located approximately two miles southwest of downtown Salem. The area within the vicinity of the landfill is zoned for commercial and industrial ' use, with several areas of open space and residential use. Potential receptors within 500 feet of the landfill include the Forest River and ' associated pond, a small wetland area associated with the pond, a residential townhouse community located approximately 200 feet southeast of the landfill, and Puritan Medical Center, located at 331 Highland Avenue, approximately 400 ' feet from the landfill. The Forest River is potentially impacted by the landfill operations, as leachate ' breakouts have been observed previously along the bank of the river. As a result of the teachate:breakeut'in=therivq tfie_associated-pond-may-also-be,iinpacted? Since,no-surface'uvater or-sediirient'studies,have-been-conducted to"date"achial ' limpacts,to_these re-sources_cannotbe:quantifiedat this time? Based on a Priority Resources Map provided by Mass GIS, there are no Public ' Water Supply Areas, Potentially Productive Aquifers, EPA Sole Source Aquifers, DEP Approved Wellhead Protection Areas, or Areas of Critical Environmental Concern(ACEC's) located within 500 feet of the landfill. ' Potential Receptors within one mile of the Landfill Within one mile of the landfill,numerous sensitive receptors exist. ' According to the Mass GIS Priority Resources Map, there are no public surface water or groundwater supply areas within '/2 mile of the landfill. There is a surface water supply, Spring Pond, located approximately one mile west of the t landfill. There is a public surface water supply protection area, also known as a Zone A, located approximately % mile to the west of the subject property. According to the Priority Resources Map, there are no potentially productive aquifers, EPA sole source aquifers, DEP approved wellhead protection areas, or areas of critical environmental concern located within one mile of the landfill. ' Peatiody Reservoir=is-located=approximately 2/3 rmileFnortheast_of the--landfillp inferred to be hydraulically upgradient from the landfill. However, this reservoir is not illustrated on the Mass GIS Priority Resources Map as a public surface water supply. 1 ' Initial Site Assessment 22 Salem,MA- � _ � - r � � i � � r � _..- --�-�-_-- - i ,f � ` � _ _ . i BETA obtained a copy of a "List of Properties With Water Wells Within the City of Salem" from the Salem Board of Health. The list includes approximately thirty private residences and businesses that use only private water supplies or a combination of both private and public water supplies. According to the list, there are two properties located approximately;/ mile northeast-ofthe la'ndfill;-located rat=14_andir6=Gfenn-Sbreet;Yhat use private water wells-These wells-arelocated'iM an-inferred-upgradient direction ' .group of residences_locatedapproximately%anile southwest of the landfill also ? use private=water wells`Wyman:Avenue;Wyman;Place,-:Wyman Street;ands ,�� t� ° Wyman'_Drrive all contain residences with private wells. These residences are ' located in an inferred cross-gradient direction from the landfill. Vincent's Potato Chip Co., located approximately '/< mile to the northeast of the ' landfill, uses both private and public water supplies. Vincent's is located in an inferred upgradient direction from the landfill. ' According to the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas, 2000-2001 Edition, there are two Vernal Pools, one Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife (Thompson's ' Meadow-WH 6015), and one Priority Habitat of Rare Species (Thompson's Meadow-PH 424) located within one mile of the landfill. The Thompson's Meadow wetland area appears to be fed by the Forest River. One of the Vernal Pools is located within the Thompson's Meadow area, and one Vernal Pool is located within the Spring Pond protected area. ' Protected open spaces within one mile of the landfill include Highland Park Golf Course, located approximately 1500 feet east of the landfill, Thompson's Meadow, located approximately 3/4 mile to the southeast of the landfill, an area associated with Spring Pond % to one mile west of the landfill, and an area surrounding a small pond and associated wetland area located approximately %2 mile northeast of the landfill. ' Residential properties located within one mile include developments located to the west, southwest, and northwest of the landfill. These developments are ' located greater than 1,000 feet from the landfill, and are also inferred to be located in a hydraulically upgradient direction. ' The-Salem High-School=is`-loocated-approximately-three-quarters-mile-northeast=of. <the landfill. 1 Initial Site Assessment 23 Salem,MA ; 6.0 Site Description ' Information in this section was compiled from information published in reports concerning regional geology, soil borings and subsurface investigations and information on file at the Massachusetts Geographic ' Information System Office(Mass GIS) in Boston. A. SOILS/BEDROCK The Salem landfill is located in an area of steep slopes and bedrock outcroppings. According to the USGS Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey for Essex County, MA (Southern Part), soils underlying the landfill are composed of the Chatfield- Hollis-rock outcrop complex. This complex consists of well-drained, moderately ' deep Chatfield soils; somewhat excessively drained, shallow Hollis soils; and exposed bedrock, with slopes ranging from 15 to 35 percent. Soils within this complex generally have a surface layer of dark gray-brown fine sandy loam, approximately one to three inches thick. The subsurface soils are composed of a dark brown-yellowish sandy loam, containing some gravel. Bedrock is estimated between 18 and 34 inches. Onsite soil borings performed by J.L. Hayden Associates Inc. in 1961, prior to construction of the original incinerator building, identified sandy loams, yellow- dark gray-brown in color, with some gravel, and refusal between two and eight feet below grade. ' BETA--cond_ucted-s -soii_borings on sitein MaTcfi20:02; localized to the northeast of the landfill area, in the vicinity of the transfer station building. a.Soils_sampled from-three of-theliorings_ dentified=fill=materials. Of the three borings that did not contain fill materials, BETA characterized the soils as sand, dark brown in color, with some gravel and cobbles, along with a.traceW=glass=fill. These findings are consistent with the Soil Survey conducted by the USGS. Boring logs are included in Appendix B. Bedrock underlying the Salem landfill is located within the Milford-Dedham ' Zone, consisting of the Diorite and Gabbro (Proterozoic Z age) complex. This complex consists of diorite and gabbro, subordinate metavolcanic rocks, and intrusive granite and granodiorite. 1 Initial Site Assessment 24 Salem,MA ; B. TOPOGRAPHY/ELEVATIONS Topography in the area of the landfill slopes to the southwest, toward the Forest River. Topography on the southwestern portion of the property slopes to the southeast, also towards the River. According to a recent survey conducted for the ' site, the elevation of the top of the landfill is approximately 80 feet above mean sea level (MSL), the elevation of the Forest River is approximately 50 feet above MSL, and the elevation of the transfer station building is approximately 85 feet above MSL. C. SURFACE WATER/GROUNDWATER Surface water in the vicinity of the landfill consists of the Forest River, which traverses the property from northwest to southeast, and an associated pond, located approximately 200 feet south of the landfill. The river flows beneath a portion of the property, which was built up over the river to connect the eastern and southwestern portions of the property, and follows Swampscott Road to the southeast, terminating in a wetland area located approximately one half mile southeast of the site. Some refuse was observed in the river at the time of BETA'S site visit. Aerial photographs from 1938, 1954, and 1969 have shown that the pond was not always the current size and shape, and may be partially defined by land development activities to the east of the pond over the last 50 years. There are no other significant surface water located within one half mile of the landfill. A groundwater study Lias—not-been—eonducted,foi=the_landfill='property. However, based on local topography, properties located to the north/northeast of the landfill are generally considered upgradient from the landfill portion of the site, and properties to the south are considered downgradient. The Forest River appears to form a drainage divide for areas east and west of the river. Thus, properties located to the northwest of the property,though considered to be upgradient from the southeastern (composting) portion of the property, are not considered upgradient from the landfill portion of the property. Initial Site Assessment 25 Salem,MA .. ' 7.0 Site Visit A. GENERAL Site reconnaissance has included three site inspections. The dates of the inspections were March 12, March 15, and April 1, 2002. Site reconnaissance was performed by James M. Smith, Senior Environmental ' Scientist, and Sean Scully, Project Manager,both of BETA Group. B. CONDITION OF LANDFILL SURFACE/CAP The=majority of.the materialwithin the landfill"'is_thought to be;inciner`ator' was e (ash)compnsed ofmc - meratteed mutucipaltsolid'waste=(MSW),:w.00d,-glass,and' metals.--Other_matenals:-witlun thC-Iandfill=appear,.to_lie un incinerated-wood plastic,-=buck, cement and:MSW. The material currently covering the landfill includes a combination of soil, ash, wood, tree stumps and composting material, cement, brick, and metal. A cut was made in the landfill, extending from the southeastern edge to the center, and is currently used to house a trailer for loading operations. Within this cutout area is an exposed section of ash and other materials located within the landfill. Slopes of the current landfill range from approximately 10 degrees on the eastern slope to 45 degrees on the western slope. The shape of the landfill area is not completely delineated, however, it is thought to extend close to the bank of the Forest River. BETA will develop information regarding the extent of the landfill when the CSA is conducted. The closure/capping of the landfill should establish a consistently sloped cover, with vents to effectively allow the escape of landfill gases and drainage benches to effectively control surface water runoff after the cap is complete. C. DIRECTION OF SURFACE WATER FLOW ht-the,-vicinity-�of the-landfill; ear as to`-the=north and--east-of-landfill-drain the south/southwest,'-towards=Forest-River and the associated-pond Areas to the west of the landfill drain primarily to the south/southeast, also towards the river and pond. ;Surface-water-on-the actual landfill surface is inferred to flow radially from the top of the landfill down the sides, and ultimately.towards-the_rive%and_porid3 As stated in Section 6 C, the Forest River appears to terminate in a wetland area located approximately one half mile to the southeast. Initial Site Assessment 26 Salem,MA ; A drainage pipe has been observed exiting the northern portion of the Forest River, where it enters beneath the constructed roadway. According to the site contact, this pipe flows beneath a portion of the landfill to an offshoot of the river, to the south/southeast of the landfill. This offshoot then joins the main portion of the river. BETA will perform a dye tracer test during the CSA activities to verify the flow within this pipe. According to the J.L. Hayden plan, topography of the site sloped to the southwest at approximately 25 degrees,prior to disturbance of the land for the landfill. D. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF ALL MONITORING DEVICES •e �_- There are currently no irionitioring wellsion_the=site.,According_to_BETA—� s research-there has never beeMR n_any environmental=testing done for the lzddfi E. LOCATION OF LEACHATE BREAKOUTS Areas of landfill leachate were witnessed previously along the banks of the Forest River with an orange/rust coloring along the southern and western faces of the landfill. All of the leachate breakouts were dry. They were either fairly old or were the result of outbreaks during rain events. F. EVIDENCE OF LANDFILL GAS EMISSIONS There are currently no methane vents installed at the Salem landfill. The monitoring of methane generation and release is therefore difficult. Generation and release rates are based upon the types of waste, its age(s), soil moisture content, soil and refuse permeability, barometric pressure and other factors. Based on the contents of the landfill contents having been incinerated prior to filling, biodegradation of waste (and methane generation) within the landfill is expected to be minimal. Methane generation and migration is a concern of all landfills. It is a greater concern at landfills that have buildings, structures or residences in adjacent areas. The Salem landfill has no structures located on the landfill portion of the property. The closest building to the landfill is the current transfer station building, located adjacent to the landfill. This building is currently unoccupied. The threat of gas I migration to this building exists, but is minimized by the fact that A) it is located in an inferred upgradient direction from the landfill, B) it is unoccupied, and C) materials in the landfill consist mainly of incinerated waste, which produces much less methane gas than non-incinerated waste. Methane generation, migration and monitoring are discussed in the CSA Scope of Work, Appendix A. Initial Site Assessment 27 Salem,MA ; G. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF SURFACE WATER AND WETLANDS As stated in Section 6C, surface water in the vicinity of the landfill consists of the Forest River, which traverses the property from northwest to southeast, and an associated pond. The river flows beneath a portion of the property, which was built up over the river to connect the eastern and southwestern portions of the property, and follows Swampscott Road to the southeast, appearing to terminate in a wetland area located approximately one half mile southeast of the site. Some refuse was observed in the river at the time of BETA'S site visit. The associated pond is located approximately 200 feet southwest of the landfill. Refuse did not appear to be prevalent in the pond like it was in the river. The nearest wetland area appears to be located along the western side of the pond, approximately 300 feet southwest of the landfill. The largest significant wetland area is located approximately one half mile southeast of the landfill, and is identified on the USGS Lynn, MA Topographic Quadrangle as Thompson's Meadow. The-Forest-River appears-to=terminate-in-the-westem pporti6n_of Thompson'sMeadow.-) There were no other significant water bodies or wetlands observed in the vicinity of the landfill. H. LANDFILL OPERATION PROCEDURES Currently, the landfill/transfer station is open Monday through Friday from 7:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., and on Saturdays from 8:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. During those periods of time, the transfer station is operated by NCI. The transfer station is permitted by DEP to accept up to 100 tons of waste per day, and currently accepts only construction and demolition (C&D) debris waste, from commercial and residential entities. Yard waste, for composting, is also accepted on the site from ' Salem residents. This debris is dropped off by residents on the southern edge of the landfill, and periodically moved to the ,eomposting piles located on the southwestern portion of the property. ' Waste brought to the transfer station is checked for content by an on-site equipment operator, and permits are verified by the weigh scale operator. The scale operator also records trucks that use the facility. At the time of BETA'S site visit,there were two heavy equipment machines on the ' site, a front-end loader and a backhoe machine with crushing attachment. Both were in use at the time of BETA's site visits, preparing material to be compacted inside the transfer station. rInitial Site Assessment 28 Salem,MA ; L LAND USE AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES The closest residential properties are the townhouse community located approximately 200 feet southeast of the landfill. The next closest residential properties are located at least 1,000 feet to the northeast, northwest, or southwest of the landfill. Most of the properties in the immediate vicinity of the landfill are commercial, including two automobile dealerships, a sandwich shop, a recreational lodge, a medical supply center, a self storage facility, and a fitness facility. Since the landfill is no longer in active operation, and the transfer station accepts only C&D debris, odors generated at the site appear to me minimal. However, odors associated-with the composting"operations on the southwestern p ion of thespropertyihaveecaused-complaints b-y-a-medicalacentevlocated;on Highland] Avenue-approximately300 feet northwest-of the land_fil1. Excessive odors were not observed by BETA during the site visits. 1 J. LANDFILL ACCESSIBILITY 1 Access to the landfill/transfer station is via Swampscott Road. Access to the site is limited by a gate, which is locked during non-business hours. The landfill is open Monday through Friday from 7:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., and on Saturdays from 8:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. 1 i 1 1 1 '1 1 Initial Site Assessment 29 Salem,MA ; ' 8.0 Mapping A. MAPS AND PLANS A site plan has been prepared for the ISA using previous site plans and a survey conducted by Survey and Mapping Consultants of Braintree, MA. Topographic information was obtained from the USGS topographic quadrangles for Lynn, MA and Salem, MA. IThe approximate limits of the landfill disposal areas were estimated from previous site plans and contours, visual inspections and aerial photographs. ' A one mile USGS topographic radius map has been included as Figure 1. A MassGIS map (1:50,000) was generated which shows sensitive environmental areas such as public water supplies, surface waters, drainage patterns and other regional information. It is included as Figure 2. For the ISA, site plans were developed at a scale of 1" = 50'. The mapping for the I CSA will use the V = 50' scale site plans as a base, and also proposed contours and other features necessary for the closure/post closure plan. The Site Plan showing existing conditions is included as Figure 3, and the Site Plan showing soil,water, and air sampling locations is included as Figure 4. Additional mapping efforts will include groundwater contour mapping of the landfill, a control survey to measure ground water elevations and all well casing elevations. Proposed contours, slope requirements and other features will also be shown. B. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN/SENSITIVE SPECIES ' According to a Mass GIS Priority Resources Map, there are no areas of critical environmental concern or sensitive species located within 500 feet of the landfill. According to the Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas, 2000-2001 Edition, there are two vernal pools, one estimated habitat of rare wildlife(Thompson's Meadow- WH 6015), and one priority habitat of rare species (Thompson's Meadow-PH 424) located within one mile of the landfill. The Thompson's Meadow wetland area appears to be fed by the Forest River. One of the vernal pools is located within the Thompson's Meadow area, and one vernal pool is located within the Spring Pond protected area. ' Initial Site Assessment 30 Salem,MA 9.0 Field Screening 1 As part of a recent geotechnical project for the existing transfer station, BETA conducted six soil borings on March 15, 2002 around the northeastern portion of the site. Three of the borings were conducted near the apparent northeastern extent of the landfill. Soil-7:s -from-these_dEee_liorings-appeared to contain ash;cinders;and metals,-and one sample from each of the three borings was submitted to Alpha Analytical Labs in Westborough, MA for laboratory analysis of RCRA 8 metals and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Analytical-results-indicate elevated_'levels-of metals_iii samples-collected=fromal three borings> BETA compared concentrations to DEP S-1 and S-2 Reportable ' Concentration (RC) standards for soil. Lead was detected above_botli_S'Land-S=2 RC standards in all three samples. PAHs-were not detected-above the=minirnum .�. $laboratory reporting-criteria in any of,"the=samples The other three soil borings were conducted to the east of the current transfer station building, approximately 40 to 100 feet east/northeast of the apparent extent of the landfill, and did not appear to exhibit signs of incineration remains or other landfill materials. However, there was evidence of filling activities, based on the trace presence of glass, in one of the borings. According to one of the equipment operators at the transfer station, an area of approximately 300 square feet to the east of the building was filled to a level grade. It is unknown when the fill was 1 placed in the area. Samples were not submitted from these three borings, as the fill contents did not appear to be related to solid waste or the landfill. ' BETA characterized the soils in the vicinity of the transfer station as fine to coarse grained sand, dark brown in color, with some gravel and cobbles, along with a trace of glass fill. These findings are consistent with a Soil Survey conducted by 1 the USGS, dated May 1984. BETA's soil boring logs are included in Appendix B. i i Initial Site Assessment 31 Salem,MA ; i 10.0 Conclusions BETA Group, Inc. has completed an ISA of the Salem Landfill, located in Salem, Massachusetts. The project was done under a contract with NCI, the current operator of the landfill, and the City of Salem, the owner of the landfill. JT-he-ISA ,, wa�ducted=to—complete=landfill-closure—requirements:"of-3_fi_0^-C-MR 1 The ISA included a review of local, state and federal reports, information, and correspondence. This included the City of Salem municipal offices (including Assessors, Engineering, Public Services, Water Department, Board of Health, 1 Public Library, and Registry of Deeds), files at the DEP (including the Bureau of Waste Prevention and the Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup) at the northeast regional office (NERO) in Wilmington, MA and a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information to the EPA Region I office in Boston, MA. Information on regional geology and hydrology, soils and surficial bedrock were derived from USGS and Soil Conservation Service reports of the area, supplemented with information obtained through on-site soil borings performed by BETA and others. Based upon the review of this information and site investigations performed during the ISA, the following conclusions have been made regarding the Salem Landfill: ' • The landfill/incinerator/transfer station was operated by the City of Salem from opening in 1963 through September 1994, and the landfill/transfer 43-9y station has been operated by NCI since September 1994. The incinerator NC--r 1 building, located on the northeastern portion of the site, was originally constructed in 1963. A portion of the incinerator building was converted to the current transfer station in 1975. The landfill portion of the site is 1 located on the eastern portion of the property. A composting area is located on the southwestern portion of the property, and is separated from the landfill/transfer station portion of the property by the Forest River. A roadway was built over a portion of the Forest River by the City of Salem to connect the two portions of the property sometime in 1969 or 1970. • Typical wastes disposed of at the incinerator have included MSW and C&D debris. Wastes accepted at the transfer station since NCI began 1 operation in 1994 have been exclusively C&D debris, with minimal MSW. Since 1975, all waste disposed of at the transfer station has been hauled off site for disposal. ' Initial Site Assessment 32 Salem,MA ; • Based on local topography and a survey conducted for the property, the direction of groundwater flow is inferred to be towards the southwest, in the direction of the Forest River and an associated pond. Groundwater flow on the western side of the Forest River appears to be toward the southeast, also towards the river. The river ultimately ends up feeding Thompson's Meadow, a wetland located approximately one half mile southeast of the landfill. i • Evidence of areas of landfill leachate were witnessed along the eastern bank of the Forest River. The leachate breakouts were of an orange/rust color, indicating a content of metals, post-incineration. • There are no public surface water or groundwater supply areas within '/� mile of the landfill. The closest surface water supply, Spring Pond, is III located approximately one mile west of the landfill. There is a public surface water supply protection area, also known as a Zone A (associated ' with Spring Pond) located approximately ''/< mile to the west of the subject property. There are no Potentially Productive Aquifers, EPA Sole Source Aquifers, DEP approved Wellhead Protection Areas, or Areas of Critical Environmental Concern located within one mile of the landfill. There are two properties located approximately % mile northeast of the landfill that use private water wells. These wells are located in an inferred upgradient direction from the landfill. 1 ' Initial Site Assessment 33 Salem,MA ; ' 11.0 Recommendations BETA Engineering, Inc. has completed an ISA of the Salem Landfill located on Swampscott Road in Salem, Massachusetts. This work was performed for NCI and the City of Salem Public Services Department. The purpose of this I assessment was to complete landfill closure requirements pursuant to 310 CMR 19.140(4)(a). There have not been any groundwater, surface water, or sediment studies conducted for the landfill, according to BETA's research. BETA conducted limited soil sampling in March 2002, primarily for geotechnical purposes. Based 1 onon=a--lack of environmental'm'formation, it is`reeoinmended:thatTgroundwater.? sui-face::water;sediment;_and.additional soil'sampling-and,analyses`be:donexto; determine-the_extent of the landfill and impacts to the environrnent A 1andfill_gas_screenmg progegii-should=be=conducted=to=quantify the-amount::ofr ' landfill:gas being generated the'extenf of migration on'and'off the site,-and the? number of vents which should be installed-'. ' The CSA Scope of Work, attached as Appendix A, is based upon the DEP outline for a scope of work of a CSA (Landfill Technical Guidance Manual, 1997). It outlines BETA's proposed assessment tasks including soil, groundwater, surface ' water, and sediment sampling plan, a plan for the installation of monitoring wells, and a plan for landfill gas screening. BETA requests that the attached CSA Scope of Work be accepted by DEP so that further investigation may begin. 1 1 Initial Site Assessment 34 Salem,MA ; 1 12.0 Limitations This ISA contains conclusions and recommendations based upon limited field activities by BETA. It has been prepared in accordance with generally acceptable engineering practices, and in accordance with DEP guidance documents regarding site assessments. The conclusions and recommendations of the ISA are limited to several site inspections, the collection of available historical data, and a limited subsurface investigation conducted by BETA. The scope of the CSA is intended to further define existing conditions at the landfill. The CSA, and additional field activities, may alter conclusions and recommendations of the ISA. Chemical parameters which have been analyzed are based upon DEP guidelines and assessment guidance documents. The number of parameters may be increased or decreased with DEP approval. There is a possibility that other chemicals in the soil were not analyzed. 1 1 1 Initial Site Assessment 35 Salem,MA 1 Attachment A References (1) City of Salem: Assessors Department ' Department of Public Works Board of Health Engineering Department IWater Department Public Library Essex County Registry of Deeds (2) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,Northeast Regional Office: Solid Waste File- Salem Landfill Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup File - Salem Landfill (3) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I Freedom of Information Act Request-One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (RAA), ' Boston, MA (4) USGS, United States Geological Survey, Salem and Lynn Quadrangles, ' Massachusetts. 7.5' Series (topographic). ' (5) USGS, 1983. United States Geological Survey, "Bedrock Geologic Map of Massachusetts. (6) US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Essex County, Southern Part, May 1984. 1 Attachment B People Interviewed Mr. Robert George, Owner Northside Carting, Inc. ' 210 Holt Road, North Andover,Massachusetts (978) 686-8604 Mr. Stanley Bornstein, P.E. Director of Public Services/City Engineer ' City of Salem 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts (978) 745-9595, Ext. 321 1 r Attachment C r Sequence of Events Salem Landfill r June 9, 1960 Salem landfill facility is site assigned by the City of Salem Board of Health for a solid waste incinerator. r March 1961 Site Plan by J.L. Hayden illustrates the construction of a solid waste incinerator building on the site. 1963 Salem landfill/incinerator opened for City of Salem waste disposal. rCirca 1968 Incinerator breaks down, is not replaced, and waste is no longer accepted at the landfill. r1969 City of Salem Engineering Department plan details the construction of a road over a portion of the Forest River. r1969-1970 Roadway constructed over a portion of the Forest River, I connecting the eastern and southwestern portions of the property. April 1975 CE Maguire Site Plan illustrates conversion of incinerator rbuilding to transfer station and construction of access road. September 9, 1975 City of Salem receives approval from the Massachusetts r Department of Environmental Quality Engineering(DEQE- now DEP)to cap landfill and convert incinerator building into a solid waste transfer station. Waste is disposed of through various other local landfills. rMay 29, 1979 Notice of Intent filed by City of Salem to DEQE. May 9, 1988 Letter from DEQE to City of Salem discussing an April 26, 1988 inspection of the transfer station. Inspection revealed that the transfer station was operating in compliance with 310 CMR 18. rAugust 18, 1993 DEP issues Notice of Non-compliance (NON) to City of Salem for conducting operations without Existing Facility Permit. r rnnm r r r June 3, 1994 Permit by Rule granted to City of Salem by DEP for the continued operation of the transfer station to accept up to 100 tons of solid waste per day. rSeptemberl, 1994 Northside Carting, Inc (NCI)begins to operate the landfill and r transfer station,under contract from the City of Salem. January 10, 1995 City of Salem issues notice to DEP stating that, as of r September 1, 1994, Salem Environmental Company(NCI)is operating the transfer station. ' January 22, 1996 NCI prepares and submits 1995 Annual Solid Waste Facility Report to DEF. r February 1, 1999 NCI prepares and submits 1998 Annual Solid Waste Facility Report to DEP. September 22, 1999 DEP conducts a compliance inspection of the landfill/transfer station facility in response to the receipt of a complaint. r December 10, 1999 DEP issues NON to the City of Salem and NCI for various violations observed during the site inspection conducted on September 22, 1999. rJanuary 6,2000 Waste Ban Plan submitted to DEP, indicating that only C&D debris was accepted by the facility. rJanuary 2000 BETA is retained by NCI and the City of Salem as consultant for environmental issues related to the landfill/transfer.station. rJanuary 17,2000 Request for Determination of Applicability submitted to Salem r Conservation Commission and DEP. Salem Conservation Commission determines that Wetlands Notice of Intent filing is required. February 16, 2000 NCI prepares and submits 1999 Annual Report of waste. r July 26,2000 DEP Enforcement Conference regarding NON issues at landfill/transfer station facility. July 2000 Wetlands Notice of Intent submitted. Order of Conditions Filed- Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. r April 19, 2001 Application for Modification of a Large Handling Facility submitted to DEP. r r r r April 19,2001 DEP Issues approval for minor alteration of transfer station facility-the placement of four containers for the storage of recyclable materials. rMay 14, 2001 DEP issues approval for Modification of Large Handling ' Facility. May 15, 2001 Leaf and Yard Waste Composting Registration Form submitted rby NCI to DEP. July 13, 2001 Administrative Consent Order with Penalty(ACOP) issued by DEF to the City of Salem and NCI. March 15, 2002 BETA performs six soil borings on the site related to the ' structural expansion of the transfer station. March 21,2002 BETA is contracted by NCI to conduct ISA and CSA for landfill r � r i ' i i r i r i 1 r r r � I w i ' APPENDIX A ' Comprehensive Site Assessment ' Scope of Work I 1 1 r r 1 City of Salem, Massachusetts 1 Proposed Scope of Work for Comprehensive Site Assessment rSalem Landfill 12 Swampscott Road Salem,Massachusetts April 2002 1 ' Prepared for: Northside Carting, Inc. 141 Rear Lynnfield Street Peabody, MA 01960 r r l BETA Group, Inc. Engineers-Scientists-Planners 1420 Proeldence KglB ay.Suite 117,Norwood,MA 02062 781.255.1982 fax 781.255.1974 r 6 Blaclamne Valley Place,Lincoln,RI 02865 401333.2382 fax 401.333.9225 ND Nwrard Sr New 1.ondon,C 08329 8K)V17.0239 email.BEfA@BEfAeW.wm i 1 Table of Contents Page 2.1 INTRODUCTION/ISA SUMMARY 1 ' 2.2 MAPPING 4 2.3 DRILLING AND SOIL MONITORING 5 General 5 Selection of Sampling Sites and Well Locations 5 Drilling and Soil Sampling 5 Monitoring Well Construction and Development 6 2.4 HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, BEDROCK AND WATER 7 TABLE MEASUREMENTS ' Hydraulic Conductivity 7 Bedrock Elevation 7 Water Table Elevation 8 2.5 GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND 9 ANALYSIS PLAN Determining Background Water Quality 9 Existing Monitoring Wells 9 Proposed Monitoring Wells 10 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Sites 10 Sampling Analysis Parameters 10 Sampling Procedures 13 ' General Sampling Protocols 14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 18 Landfill Gas Screening 24 Baseline Risk Assessment 24 2.6 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN 25 2.7 CSA TASKS AND SCHEDULE 26 ' 2.8 DRAFT CSA REPORT SUBMITTAL 27 List of Attachments Attachment A Soil Classification System Attachment B Analytical Methods and Detection Limits ' 2.1 Introduction/Initial Site Assessment Summary BETA Group, Inc.has completed an Initial Site Assessment(ISA)of the Salem Landfill, located at 12 Swampscott Road in Salem, Massachusetts. This work was performed under contract with Northside Carting, Inc (NCI) for the City of Salem, in coordination with the Department of Public Works. The purpose of this assessment was to comply with landfill closure regulations stipulated in 310 CMR 19.140(4)(a). The scope of the ISA is summarized in the following outline. An outline of the Scope of Work (SOW) for the proposed Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA)is also included below: ISA/CSA Tasks ISA Tasks ' • Research previous studies and history at site/perform site inspection • Perform regulatory agency records review • Design and planning of QA/QC • Design ground water monitoring system • Prepare geophysical monitoring plan • Estimate supplies, equipment, and services for CSA • Permits/Approvals from DEP and City • Prepare CSA SOW tCSA Tasks ' • Prepare Health and Safety Plan • Baseline Risk Assessment • Locate proposed boring and well locations • Prepare landfill gas screening plan • Mobilize drilling contractor Construct wells and gas monitoring system ' • Develop wells • Determine hydraulic conductivity and groundwater contours • Quarterly ground water sampling for one year ' Measure level of ground water at wells on site Purge and sample wells in accordance with EPA and DEP guidelines Decontaminate equipment Deliver samples to qualified laboratory • Prepare and submit CSA Report • Review of Report by DEP and City 1 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; I The ISA involved a review of available information on the landfill, including reports and records on file with the Salem Engineering Department, Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Department, Assessing Department, Board of Health, and Public Library, the Essex County Registry of Deeds, and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Division of Solid Waste Management, Northeast Regional Office in Wilmington, Massachusetts. Additional background information was provided by published geologic and hydrologic data of the region, and geographic data contained in the Massachusetts Geographic Information System (Mass GIS) at the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs in Boston, Massachusetts. The following is a summary of the findings of the ISA. Based upon the review of ' available information and site investigations performed during.the ISA, the following conclusions have been made regarding the Salem Landfill: ' • The landfill/incinerator/transfer station was operated by the City of Salem from opening in 1963 through September 1994, and the landfill/transfer station has been operated by NCI since September 1994. The incinerator building, located on the northeastern portion of the site, was originally constructed in 1963. A portion of the incinerator building was converted to the current transfer station in 1975. The landfill portion of the site is located on the eastern portion of the property. A ' composting area is located on the southwestem portion of the property, and is separated from the landfill/transfer station portion of the property by the Forest River. A roadway was built over a portion of the Forest River by the City of Salem ' to connect the two portions of the property sometime in 1969 or 1970. • Typical wastes disposed of at the incinerator have included MSW and C&D debris. Wastes accepted at the transfer station since NCI began operation in 1994 have been exclusively C&D debris, with minimal MSW. Since 1975, all waste disposed of at the transfer station has been hauled off site for disposal. • Based.on local to'o topography and a survey conducted for the propeity;the direction of groundwater-flow is inferred to be—towards the southwest, in the direction of the t Forest River,and an associated pond. Groundwater flow on the western side of the Forest River appears to be toward the southeast, also towards the river. The river ultimately ends up feeding Thompson's Meadow, a wetland located approximately one half mile southeast of the landfill. • Evidence,of_areas.of:landfill=leachate were-,witnessed along the eastern bank of the Forest River. The leachate breakouts were of an orange/rust color, indicating a content of metals,post-incineration. 2 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; ' • There are no public surface water or groundwater supply areas within '/2 mile of the landfill. The closest surface water supply, Spring Pond, is located approximately one mile west of the landfill. There is a public surface water supply protection area, also known as a Zone A (associated with Spring Pond) located approximately mile to the west of the subject property. There are no Potentially Productive ' Aquifers, EPA Sole Source Aquifers, DEP approved Wellhead Protection Areas, or Areas of Critical Environmental Concern located within one mile of the landfill. .There-are-two properties-located"approxunately'/z`mile northeast of the-lan_dfilljhat_:� use private water wells:-These=wells are located"in'an inferred-upgradienf direction from-the landfill ' The proposed scope of work for a CSA includes mapping, drilling, hydraulic conductivity testing, sampling and analysis of soil, surface water, and groundwater, preparation of a health and safety plan, completion of a baseline risk assessment, and preparation of the CSA Report. The scope of work is intended to develop existing data regarding the characterization of the hydrogeology beneath the landfill and hydraulically downgradient areas, impacts of the landfill upon soil, groundwater, and surface water, and an evaluation of risk potential to public health and the environment. Tasks of the proposed CSA Scope of Work are provided in the following sections. 3 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; ' 2.2 Mapping A new base map will be produced which reflects all on-site and off-site soil boring and monitoring well locations. During the ISA, a site plan was developed at a scale of 1"= 50'. A USGS 1 mile radius map was produced, in accordance with DEP guidelines, to reflect the topography and wetlands in the vicinity of the site. A Massachusetts Geographic Information Systems (GIS) map was produced to reflect Public Water Supply Areas, Potentially Productive Aquifers, EPA Sole Source Aquifers, DEP Approved Wellhead Protection Areas, and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). ' Additional mapping efforts include locations of proposed borings and wells. Proposed contours, slope requirements and other features will also be shown. Base mapping will be "layered", to produce different maps. For instance, one map may show existing surface and groundwater contours, while another may show existing and proposed final grades of the landfill. This map is included as Figure 4. Geologic cross (2) sections will also be produced as a part of the CSA mapping efforts, in accordance with DEP requirements. In addition, soil and gas monitoring locations will be located, based upon the results of field activities. All maps and plans will be signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer who is registered in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 4 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ' 2.3 Drilling and Soil Monitoring General ' Recommended drilling and field procedures are described in the following section. All drilling, soil sampling, and well construction activities will be performed in accordance with DEP "Standard References for Monitoring Wells, publication WSC-310-91", and EPA guidelines. Soil classification methods will be according to AASHTO Designation M146-70 ' (1980). This system is discussed in Attachment A. . Selection of Sampling Sites and Well Locations Groundwater flow in the project area is inferred to be to the southwest. The nearby presence of the Forest River indicates that is located at a maximum of 30 feet below the ground surface. Based upon DEP and EPA guidance documents related to landfill assessment, a minimum of five monitoring well locations will be installed, including one upgradient from the landfill for background information. The proposed well locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 3. Prior to drilling and monitoring well installation activities, BETA will conduct several test pits using on-site equipment, in an attempt to define the extent of the landfill. Once the extent of the landfill are more completely understood, BETA will proceed with the drilling and monitoring well installation program. One soil boring/monitoring well location is proposed on the eastern portion of the property, ' to the northeast of the landfill. This well is intended to provide background groundwater quality data,being located in an inferred upgradient direction from the landfill. ' The other four proposed soil boring/monitoring well locations are along the southern and western perimeters of the landfill, based on the inferred downgradient locations from the landfill. The inferred southern and western boundaries of the landfill are thought to be close to the Forest River. Based on this information, three of the wells will be installed close to the Forest River. The final well will be installed along the western border of the landfill. ' Drilling and Soil Sampling The proposed wells can be installed using a truck-mounted drilling rig with drive and wash drilling methods. Four inch cased holes will be drilled. A potable source of water will be used for drilling. This water will be used for all drilling and will be recirculated. Drilling equipment, including drill rods, sampling equipment, etc., that may have come in contact with contaminated material shall be decontaminated using high pressure detergent steam cleaning equipment. Distilled water rinsing will follow. Decontamination will be conducted for all borings at the site. ' S Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA � � A copy of a standard boring log will be included in the Draft CSA Report, along with borehole abandonment procedures. Should any wells need abandonment procedures, they will be in accordance with DEP guidance document WSC-310-91. A drilling QA/QC Plan will also be submitted in the draft CSA report, and will include the ' driller and consultant well logs, as built monitoring well designs and grout-mix ratios. Soil samples will be collected using a two foot split-spoon sampler, at five foot intervals. The split-spoon sampler will be decontaminated prior to collection of each sample. Soil samples will be logged on-site, and will be screened in the field for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Screening protocols for VOCs will be in accordance with DEP Policy#WSC-401-91. Soil samples will be placed in ajar, covered with aluminum foil, set to volatilize, and then measured for total VOCs using a photoionization detector(PID). If soil samples collected during the soil boring procedures are above ten parts per million (ppm), a soil sample will be submitted for laboratory analysis. Field screening results will be included in each of the boring logs and summarized in the CSA. Analyses will include ' VOCs and inorganics, including metals, in accordance with the DEP Solid Waste Regulations. Monitoring Well Construction and Development Wells will consist of two-inch inside diameter PVC (solid and slotted) flush jointed riser. Ten feet of slotted screen (0.010 inch) will be installed in each of the wells. Clean sand will fill the space surrounding the screened sections and above the screen. Bentonite will be placed above the sand to seal the well space. Cement and bentonite grout will then be added around the wells. Wells will be finished with a locking protective casing. These will be j cemented into place to prevent damage and/or vandalism. Each new well will be installed and developed to ensure collection of representative ground water samples, in accordance with DEP Guidance Document WSC-310-91. Development will be conducted by surging or pumping methods, and purging will consist of at least five full well volumes of water. ' 6 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; i ' 2.4 Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity Hydraulic Conductivity Rising and/or falling head tests will be used to determine hydraulic conductivity, in accordance with DEP guidance document #WSC-310-91. The rising head test method involves the removal of a volume of water from the well, and subsequent rise of the water level to its original elevation. ' The falling head method involves the addition of a volume of water to a well, and the rate of fall of the water level to its original elevation. The rise/fall test methods will be monitored using a pressure transducer which senses the rise/fall in the well during the removal/addition of the slug of water, as the well level tries to again reach equilibrium. Falling head tests will not be performed where monitoring wells are screened across the water table. i The pressure level changes will be taken every few seconds and then tabulated. The transducer is accurate to 0.001 feet. Data will be included in a hydraulic conductivity formula, taking into account the size of the well, volume of water added/removed and screening length, among other factors. Data sheets will be included in the draft CSA for all hydraulic conductivity measurements. In addition, calculations and assumptions regarding hydraulic conductivity analyses will be included in the draft CSA. ' Bedrock Elevation There is limited data with regard to depth to bedrock. It has been estimated bedrock depth is between five and 35 feet below ground surface. Onsite soil borings performed by J.L. Hayden Associates Inc. in 1961, prior to construction ' of the original incinerator building, identified refusal between two and eight feet below grade. This refusal is thought to be bedrock, based on bedrock outcroppings in the vicinity of the site. BETA conducted six soil borings on site in March 2002, localized to the northeast of the landfill area, in the vicinity of the transfer station building. Three of the borings, conducted ' closest to the landfill portion of the site, were not met with refusal. The other three borings, conducted on the eastern portion of the property, were met with refusal between six and nine feet below grade. Soils sampled from three of the borings identified fill materials. Of the ' three borings that did not contain fill materials, BETA characterized the soils as sand, dark brown in color, with some gravel and cobbles, along with a trace of glass fill. These findings are consistent with the Soil Survey conducted by the USGS. 7 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA i. 1 BETA characterized the soils in the vicinity of the landfill and transfer station as fine to coarse grained sand, dark brown in color, with some gravel and cobbles, along with a trace of glass fill. The confining limit of the landfill is inferred to be bedrock, approximately five to 35 feet below the grade at the base of the landfill. The available depth to bedrock data will be used to develop cross sections of the bedrock geology, soils and ground water. Two cross sections will be produced at right angles as a part of the CSA Report. No additional bedrock investigations are proposed. ' Water Table Elevations ' Water table elevations will be obtained for each proposed monitoring well location. Water table contours will be developed in the vicinity of the landfill. Elevations will be taken quarterly at each location for one year during ground water sampling events. ' Water table contour maps will be produced during the CSA. The contour maps will be done for seasonal high and low water table periods, and shown on landfill plan and profile ' drawings. Depths to water will be measured using a water level meter. With this method, an electronic probe is lowered into the well, and rings an alarm when water is encountered. 1 8 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA 11 a oil s t ' 2.5 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling and Analysis Plan tDetermining Background Water Quality Characterizing the existing or baseline quality of ground water is important for several ' reasons. First, existing ground water quality defines the baseline conditions for evaluating risks to human health and the environment. Second, existing ground water quality, in part, determines current uses and affects future uses. Determining ground water uses is an important initial step in identifying potential downgradient exposure pathways. Evaluating background water quality in the area must consider not only possible background concentrations of selected chemicals, but also the background concentrations of other potential leachate constituents. Existing chemical parameters associated with indicator chemicals (i.e., chloride or iron) or other RCRA hazardous 'constituents may be due to natural conditions in the area or releases from other upgradient sources in the area. There are currently no wells located in the vicinity of the landfill. The installation of an upgradient well location is necessary. Measuring background concentrations of every possible hazardous constituent is not feasible. To assess background groundwater quality, this investigation attempted to identify ' other potential release sources in the area. Historical research has indicated that there have been several high risk businesses historically located upgradient from the landfill, around the intersection of Swampscott Road and Highland Avenue. These businesses have included Suburban Oil Company, Stutz Volvo, Spence Welding, Doyle Gulf Service, Eastern Tank and Equipment, Sargent Oil Storage, George Viel Gas Station, and Murphy's Filling Station. The DEP requires a minimum of four quarterly rounds of sampling analyses to be used in ' the development of the Baseline Risk Assessment, submitted in the Draft CSA report. The monitoring plan may be amended after one year, with DEP approval, based upon analytical results. Existing Monitoring Wells ' There are no known monitoring wells existing at the landfill. In order to adequately address off-site migration of groundwater contamination and contamination to deeper portions of the aquifer, thq-installation-of monitoring wells is recommended. 9 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA � � ' Proposed Monitoring Wells Monitoring Well Effective Screen Groundwater Location Depth Depth(estimated) MW-1 30-40 30 MW-2 20-30 20 ' MW-3 15-25 15 MW-4 15-25 15 MW-5 10-20 10 Landfill leachate has been observed in the past to be emanating from the Salem Landfill, along its southwestern banks, into the Forest River. Leachate was not observed during BETA's recent site inspections in March and April 2002. Sampling site locations are discussed in the following sections. Surface (River) Water Sampling Locations Two surface water samples are proposed to be taken from the Forest River, one upstream from the landfill and one downstream from the landfill. The two selected river water sampling sites are shown in Figure 4. Sample analysis parameters are discussed below. Sediment(River Bed) Sampling Locations ' Two sediment samples are proposed to be taken and analyzed as a part of the baseline risk assessment. Both samples will be collected from the bed of the Forest River, one upstream from the landfill, and one downstream. Analytical parameters will include total metals and ' acid/base neutral extractables. The two selected sediment sampling sites are shown in Figure 4. Sample Analysis Parameters Parameters to be tested for are given in the following list. Quarterly samples for all sites will ' be analyzed for these parameters. The list of parameters to be analyzed was developed by DEP. Analytical methods and method detection limits are included in Attachment B. to Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ' Analysis Parameters for Soil Organics-EPA Method 8260 Inorganics (Metals) ' a. Arsenic b. Barium c. Cadmium ' d. Chromium e. Copper f. Cyanide ' g. Iron It. Lead i. Manganese j. Mercury k. Nickel 1. Selenium ' m. Silver n. Zinc ' Analysis Parameters for Sediment ' Acid-Base Neutral Extractables Inorganics(Metals) ' a. Arsenic b. Barium c. Cadmium ' d. Chromium e. Copper f. Cyanide g. Iron It. Lead i. Manganese j. Mercury k. Nickel 1. Selenium ' m. Silver n. Zinc ' Dry Weight(percent water) ' 11 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; ' Analysis Parameters for 4 - Groundwater and Surface Water In-situ Parameters � w - H 10 b. Temperature M 1 -Y i 0; ' c Conductance 1A w-'t1J - i 0 ,)y Dissolved Oxygen(DO) c� ' General Parameters 5 A -a. Alkalinity e :l 5 6. Nitrate Nitrogen(as Nitrogen) K� c. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) -d. Chloride tee. Iron Manganese 3 yU --g: Sulfate ' �-h. Chemical Oxygen Demand(COD) Inorganics ' a. Arsenic 5t,v_ 10:00 --%b. Barium - c. Cadmium SFC gid. Chromium e. Copper -'£ Cyanide VEll- g. Lead h. Mercury i. Nickel Sw�� f � :©D ' j. Selenium k. Silver 1. Zinc ' Organics-EPA Method 8260 VK mow- yD -Z tA- Imvj-3 �3 pis ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 12 Salem,MA ; Sampling and Analysis Procedures The purpose of this section is to establish sampling procedures so samples are collected in a ' consistent manner for the monitoring program. The laboratory will supply all sample bottles and place the proper preservatives within the ' sample bottles before they are delivered. Samples will be collected by BETA personnel. Samples will be analyzed by a laboratory certified by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ' to perform all the required analyses. ' In-situ measurements will be taken from a separate sample collected at each location. Sampling methods will be in accordance with guidelines given in the DEP Standard ' References for Monitoring Wells. Sampling methods and a quality assurance/quality control program are given in the following sections. ' Groundwater and surface water samples will not be filtered, and will be analyzed for total metals. If the results indicate the presence of metals above the Maximum Containminant Level (MCL), the following round of samples will be field filtered, in accordance with DEP ' guidelines, and will be analyzed for dissolved metals. Otherwise, total metal analyses-will continue. Analytical methods and method detection limits are included in Attachment B. ' Samples will be taken quarterly from each of the wells and from the Forest Rivet for a one- year period. If the concentrations of any of the parameters exceed state Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLS) BETA shall: 1. Notify the DEP within 14 days of the finding; ' 2. Collect, analyze, and submit to the Department another round of sampling information from the location within 60 days of the prior date of sample collection and determine the concentration of all parameters analyzed. ' The wells will be purged utilizing "Wattera Tubes", or dedicated sampling tubes. This method utilizes a check valve attached to polyethylene tubing. As the tubing is raised and ' lowered, water in the tubing is displaced and carried to the surface. Repeated pumping of the Wattera tubing provides a stream of water from which to collect groundwater samples. Surface Water Sampling—Forest River The Forest River grab samples will be collected by use of manual samplers such as a ' stainless steel bucket. Surface water grab samples will be collected from two locations along the Forest River-one location upstream from the landfill, and one location downstream from the landfill. The samples will be kept in a cooler at 4°C in a bottle with the appropriate preservatives until they are delivered to the laboratory. 13 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA rilyn, 1 ' General Sampling Protocol The sampling team will use a funnel to transfer each sample from the field container to a ' sample bottle. Each grab sample will be split into the individual sample bottles in the field until a sufficient volume is collected. Special care will be taken to ensure that each sample ' bottle is not overfilled, which would weaken the integrity of the preservative. All sample bottles will have a waterproof label showing the following information: ' Sample identification • Initials of sampler ' Sampling location Preservatives • Grab number ' Parameters • Date and time(military) • Laboratory name The sampling team leader will fill in the blank spaces on the label, which will be grab number, date, time, and initials. All bottles will be transported in a cooler at the temperature ' of 4°C. Field Notes ' Careful documentation of sampling events through the recording of field notes is important . to ensure the accurate reporting of site conditions. The forms used for field notes are described below. The field notes will be recorded in a bound, waterproof notebook. Included in the notes will ' be the date, military time, names of the sampling team members, weather conditions, sampling locations, sampling procedure, sampling device and field container number, dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, conductivity, visual observations, and any problems ' encountered. A copy of each of these documents will be kept by the Sample Handling Manager at all times. Copies of all notes will be made after each sampling event. ' A log book for tracking the samples from the field to the sample distribution center and to the laboratories will be maintained throughout the quarterly monitoring program. Visual Observations Visual observations will be made during sampling events. Observations will include ' descriptions of the aesthetics of the surface water near the surface monitoring locations, and any problems with well locations. Field personnel will note the presence of debris, oil and grease, odor, and so forth. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 14 Salem,MA ; ' Sample Preparation and Preservation ' Sample Bottles Sample bottles containing the proper preservative for sample preservation will have been ' prepared by the laboratory. The table below lists the bottle material, preservation method, and holding time for each parameter. Sample bottles will be obtained from the laboratory, who will prepare them in accordance with the following: ' Bottle Material: plastic or glass Bottle Size: Depends upon analyses required Cleaning Reagents: 1. Phosphate-free detergent ' 2. Distilled water Procedure: ' 1. Rinse bottles with tap water. 2. Soak bottles in detergent solution for approximately 30 minutes. 3. Scrub bottles with a brush. ' 4. Rinse bottles several times with tap water to remove the detergent. 5. Rinse bottles thoroughly several times with distilled water. ' Bottle Order Standards/Preparation: 1. Bottles are purchased pre-cleaned and rinsed with distilled water prior to use. 2. VOA vials and amber bottles are placed in laboratory oven at 115°C for a ' minimum of one hour and used within 24 hours. 3. Bottles will be preserved prior to field visits by the laboratory(see attached form for standard bottle order preparation). ' 4. Trip and equipment blanks will be prepared as specified in the QA/QC program. 5. Bottle orders are prepared according to the standards set forth in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 17`h Edition. 1989. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 15 Salem,MA ; i ' Sample Containers, Preservation, and Holding Time Requirements Parameter Media Container Preservative Holding Time ' Metals Water 1L plastic bottle Dissolved—field filtration(0.45 micron),HCI pH<2 6 Months Total—HCI pH<2,cool 4°C Soil 8-oz glass jars Cool 4°C 6 Months Cyanide Water Glass pH>12 NaOH 6 Months Soil Glass pH>12 NaOH 6 Months ' Volatile Organics Water 3 40 ml glass vials with Teflon 2 drops 1:1 HCI,cool 4°C 14 days lined septum caps 2 40 ml glass vials with Teflon Soil lined septum caps Cool 4'C 14 days ' Semi-Volatile Water 1 L amber glass bottle Cool 4°C 14 days Organics Soil 8-oz.glass jars Cool 4°C 14 days ' Total Petroleum Water I L amber glass bottle Cool 4°C,HCI to pH<2 14 days Hydrocarbons Soil 8-oz,glass jars Cool 4°C 14 days ' 7 days(before PCB's Water 1 L amber glass bottle Cool 4°C extraction)40 days (after extraction) 7 days(before ' Soil 8-oz.glass jars Cool 4°C extraction)40 days (after extraction) 7 days(before ' Pesticides Water I L amber glass bottle Cool 4°C extraction)40 days (after extraction) 7 days(until Soil 8-oz.glass jars Cool 4°C extraction)40 days ' (after extraction) Total Dissolved Solids Water 500 ml,plastic bottle Cool 4°C 7 days Biological Oxygen demand Water 500 mL plastic bottle Cool 4°C 48 hours ' Chemical Oxygen Water 500 mL plastic bottle Cool 4°C 48 hours Demand Chlorides Water 500 mL plastic bottle Cool 4'C 14 days Sulfate Water 500 mL plastic bottle Cool 4°C 14 days Alkalin Water 500 mL plastic bottle Cool 4°C 14 days Nitrate Water 500 mL plastic bottle Cool 4°C 14 days Source 1)"Standard References for Monitoring Wells,"Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Publication N WSC-310-91, January 1991. 2)Methods of chemical analysis of water and wastes,U.S,EPA 600/4-7M20,EMSI-1983. 3)Test methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods,U.S.EPA SW-846,1986. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 16 Salem,MA ; Sample Customs The primary objective of establishing sample custody documentation is to create an accurate written record that can be used to trace the possession of a sample from the moment of collection through laboratory analysis. To achieve this objective, chain-of-custody procedures will be followed in the field and in the laboratory so that each sample collected ' is of known or ascertainable origin and quality. A Chain-of-Custody Record will be started in the field upon collection of sample. ' Information will also be recorded in the field notebook to be maintained by the sampler. For each cooler of multiple sample bottles to be transported, a Chain-of-Custody Record ' containing the individual samples inside the cooler will be sealed in a zip-lock bag and placed inside the cooler. The sampler will sign and date each Chain-of-Custody Record before sealed in the cooler and will retain a copy of it for his or her records. 1 A consistent, coded sample numbering system will allow each sample to be tracked from the field through the sample distribution center to the laboratory. Immediately upon receiving the samples, the laboratory sample custodian will store them in a clean, dry sample storage room. The sample custodian will maintain a sample log book, noting the storage location of each sample and recording the time when the sample was removed for analysis and the name of the person to whom the sample was relinquished. The sample storage refrigerator will be locked at all times. Samples will be handled by the ' proper laboratory personnel, who will ensure that all samples are properly preserved and maintained. ' Samples will be distributed for analysis to the appropriate analytical personnel. Laboratory sample custodian, under the direction of the laboratory coordinator, will maintain custody and handle all data by manual or computer in accordance with approved QA/QC protocols. The sample analyst will record in a laboratory notebook or worksheet the sample description, analytical methodology, analytical results, date, name of the analyst, and any abnormalities that may have occurred during the analytical procedure. The notes will be ' retained by the laboratory as a permanent record. The laboratory area will be maintained as a secured area, and access will be restricted to analytical personnel who are responsible for the care and custody of a sample once it is in possession. After the sample analyses are completed, the unused portion of the sample, together with identifying labels and other documentation, will be returned to the laboratory sample ' custodian and will be retained in a sample custody room until the laboratory supervisor receives permission from the Field Monitoring Task Manager to dispose of the samples. 17 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA 1 ' Sample Shipment The samples will be kept in a cooler at the temperature of 4°C. The travel time from the ' sample distribution center to each laboratory during peak traffic hours will be estimated before the monitoring program starts. This estimate is important in meeting the maximum holding times of the samples. Holding time is defined as the interval between sample collection and extraction or analysis. For this program, the maximum holding time is 48 hours (BOD, COD). Summary: Analytical Methods, Procedures, and Detection Limits ' Groundwater and surface water samples will be analyzed for total metals. If results indicate the presence of metals above the Maximum Contaminant (MCL), the following round will be field filtered and analyzed for dissolved metals. However, if the results are below the MCL,the process will continue with total metals analysis. Alternative, EPA-approved methods may be used, depending on advance approval by the ' DEP. If alternative methods are necessary, a description of the proposed methods and the supporting rationale will be submitted by BETA to the DEP for approval and appended as an amendment to this plan after they are approved. ' The method detection limits specified in Attachment B are intended as guidelines. Detection limits will be validated in accordance with the procedure specified in the Code of Federal Regulation Title 40, Appendix B to Part 136. The detection limits are in accordance with (that is, at or below) the sample acute criteria ' recommended in Quality Criteria for Water 1986 (EPA 440/5-86-001), also known as the "Gold Book," for parameters for which criteria have been developed. The detection limit guidelines will also allow comparison with criteria set state's water quality standards. Analytical methods and method detection limits are listed in Attachment B. Quality Assurance Objectives The overall quality assurance (QA) objective is to develop and implement procedures for obtaining and evaluating data that can be used to help achieve the project objectives outlined above. Equipment Calibration Procedures Equipment used in the field during the monitoring program (for example, field analytical instruments) will be calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Equipment t Manager will be responsible for equipment calibration, maintenance, and repair during the monitoring program. ' 18 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ITIM., 1 ' Equipment will be calibrated in accordance with the wet weather and dry weather sampling schedule. The dissolved oxygen meters will be calibrated by the Winkler method before they are sent to the field. Air calibration will be prohibited. The conductivity and pH meters will be calibrated in the field according manufacturer's specifications, field conditions, and sampling frequency. Individual records of calibration will be maintained for each piece of equipment and will include the name, date, times, and record of calibration/deviation; and features or problems of each piece. Preventive Maintenance Routine maintenance procedures and schedules for sampling equipment and field measurement instruments are described in the manufacturers' instruction manuals. All ' records of inspection and maintenance will be dated and documented in the field notebooks. Maintenance procedures and schedules for all analytical instruments will be in strict ' conformance with the recommendations of the equipment manufacturers. Routine maintenance will be performed by laboratory personnel as needed. Specialized inspection and maintenance of major equipment will be performed by trained service personnel from ' the manufacturers in accordance with instrument service contracts. All records of inspection and maintenance will be dated and documented in the laboratory record books. ' Data Reduction The laboratory will be responsible for data reduction associated with sample analysis. Data ' reduction techniques will be consistent for the laboratory and will result in the reporting of concentration data in common units. Data Validation As part of the laboratory's internal quality control program, analytical data produced by the laboratory will be validated before they are released. Performance goals and quality control evaluation procedures will be documented individually for each analytical procedure. ' In general, all laboratory data will be reviewed internally in light of analytical instrumentation, calibration and performance information, analytical results for laboratory blanks, analytical results for split samples, and recoveries achieved for matrix and surrogate ' spikes. The analytical results will be reviewed for their reasonableness, as well as for calculation and recording errors. When data validation is finished, the sample analyst and the laboratory supervisor will approve the final analytical report. 19 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; This Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) is independent of die internal QA/QC PIan of the laboratory and encompasses both the sampling ng component and the analytical component of the work. Consequently, the performance of both laboratory methods and the field sampling methods will be assessed using QA/QC practices begun in the field (for example, field control samples, blanks, spikes, and duplicates). Data validation for both the laboratory methods and the field sampling methods will occur after the results are received from the laboratory. ' Blind blanks and split samples, the identities of which are not known by laboratory personneL will be prepared by the sampling teams for laboratory analysis. These field- initiated QC samples will provide most of the information needed to review overall ' monitoring program (sampling and analysis) performance. The precision of the field split samples will be assessed by comparing the analytical results with the data quality objectives for precision. Also at this time, field blank analytical results, aswell as laboratory-generated QA/QC information (for example, detection achieved, recovery for spiked samples) will be evaluated relative to the data objectives. ' Data Reporting Data reporting will begin in the field and will be tightly interwoven with the chain-of- custody procedures described above. The sample distribution center is considered to be the work vehicle. The sample custodian in the van will maintain a log book of pertinent information for each sample (including QC samples),including sample number, preservatives added, sample preparation, and laboratory destination. As in the field, much of the log book information will be recorded on the new ' sample bottle labels and Chain-of-Custody Records. The sample logbook, however, also contains information on field blanks, duplicate samples, spike duplicate, and performance evaluation samples. Laboratory data sheets will be submitted for all sample analyses in all sampled media. Data sheets will include: the date of sample collection, date and time of arrival at the lab and ' dates when analyses and extractions were performed. The data sheets must also include the detection limits, the analytical method, the signature of the person performing the analysis and rationale/explanation for any deviation from approved procedures. The state certified lab will perform all analyses and data sheets for all blanks and duplicate runs will be submitted. In addition, chain-of-custody sheets must be submitted for all collected samples whose analyses will be used to indicate groundwater and surface water quality parameters and trends. Copies of the"groundwater sampling logs" will be submitted in the Draft CSA Report. 20 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ' Internal Quality Control Checks Internal quality control (QC) checks will help monitor the performance of the field sampling t and laboratory activities. In accordance with Interim Guidelines and Specifications fof Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPS, QAMS-005/80), this section describes the QC checks that will be implemented to ensure that the data generated in the monitoring program is of known quality. ' Sampling Quality Control Checks Sampling and analytical quality control will be monitored using QC samples that are ' submitted as blind samples to the laboratory. In this way, the QC samples treated as any other routine sample. The following QC checks will be implemented ' Samples of known, certified parameter values (spiked samples) will be submitted to the laboratory for analysis. The measured levels will be compared to "known" levels to ensure accurate analysis of samples, in accordance with DEP protocol. Field control samples ' (FCS) will be submitted to the laboratory, with a minimum of two for the entire yearly monitoring program. FCS may include QC samples obtained from EPA, or spiked field samples. ' Blanks will be collected for each sampling event, with a minimum of one blank for every 10 samples in each matrix. Field duplicates will be collected for each sampling event, with a ' minimum of one duplicate for every 10 samples, or one duplicate if fewer than 10 samples are collected. All field blanks and field control samples will be taken and submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Questionable samples (fear of contamination, sample container leakage, and sampling equipment failure) will not be taken. Quality Assurance/Quality Control(QA/QC) ' samples deemed acceptable shall be submitted to the laboratory. Analytical Quality Control Checks ' Analytical quality will be monitored by several methods, depending on the parameters to be analyzed. The QC checks are described below. ' The BOD parameter will be analyzed in strict accordance with the specified method. Because spikes and duplicates are not entirely appropriate, the following QC checks will be implemented: Reagent blanks will be analyzed, as described in the specified method, one time for each analytical batch and matrix. Calibration of the dissolved oxygen meter will be performed daily by the Winkler titration ' method. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 21 Salem,MA l Field Measurements ' Field measurement QC for pH, conductivity, salinity, and dissolved oxygen will be provided ' through implementation of the following field operating procedures: • Compliance with the operation and calibration requirements specified in this plan and in the manufacturer's instructions • Periodic reports of measurement of parameters by field personnel • Field calibration confirmation with known values ' Other Quality Control Checks Other quality control checks and measures are incorporated within the standard operating ' procedures and analytical methods. Though not described herein, these activities will be performed during the work as standard professional practice. Corrective Actions If a quality control audit detects unacceptable conditions or data, the Project Manager will ' be responsible for developing and initiating corrective action. The Quality Assurance Officer will determine whether the nonconformance is significant or requires specialized expertise or remedial analyses. Corrective action may include the following: ' • Re-analyzing samples (if holding times permit) • Resampling and re-analyzing •Evaluating and amending sampling and analytical procedures • Accepting the data and acknowledging the level of uncertainty or inaccuracy by flagging the data and providing a qualifying explanation ' To meet QA/QC objectives, data must be secured through the collection of samples that represent actual field conditions and through sample analyses that have the appropriate ' degree of sensitivity,reproducibility, and accuracy. Specific data quality objectives are established based on the criteria of precision, accuracy, ' completeness, representativeness, and comparability. The application of these criteria to sample collection and analysis is discussed below. QA objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness are presented below. Precision ' Precision is a measure of the reproducibility of the results of a given group of analyses under a given set of conditions. It assesses the scatter of data when more than one measurement of the same sample is taken. 22 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA i ' Sampling precision is a function of the standard operating procedure used to collect, store, and transport the sample and of the variability or homogeneity of the media being sampled. Analytical precision is a function of the analytical procedure used, the analysts' technique, and instrument performance. The overall sampling and analytical precision will be determined by obtaining and analyzing ' field duplicated (split) samples that are unknown to the laboratory. The analytical precision will be determined by analyzing laboratory duplicated (split) samples using ordinary ' duplicates or matrix spike\matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD), as appropriate to the analytical method. ' Accuracv Accuracy is a measure of bias within a measurement system. It assesses the margin of error ' between the reported results and the true sample concentration. Unlike precision, accuracy is difficult to measure for the entire measurement system. Sources of error pertaining to accuracy include the sampling method, field contamination, preservation, handling, sample ' matrix, calibration, and analysis. The elimination of false positive and false negative analytical data from the measurement ' system is one of the primary objectives of the accuracy criterion. The potential for false positive values will be assessed through the analysis of field blanks and laboratory blanks, which must be less than the MDL or instrument detection limit. The potential for false ' negative values will be assessed through the analysis of matrix spikes. The analysis of spikes provides information on percent recovery of an analyte, and thus the amount of bias. Because of the difficulties inherent in field spiking, this method will not be used to assess sampling and analytical accuracy. Accuracy will also be assessed by the use of control samples of"known"composition. Field ' control samples (FCS) will be submitted as "blind" samples for analysis by the laboratory. Laboratory control samples (LCS) will be analyzed by the laboratory with each analytical batch, where appropriate. Completeness Completeness is a measure of the amount of valid data obtained from an analytical measurement system. Completeness can be affected by access to sampling locations, sampling problems, analytical problems, and data validation problems, all of which can ' result in missing data. Completeness is defined as the total number of samples collected for which acceptable analytical data are generated, divided by the total number of samples collected, and multiplied by 100, yielding a percentage value. The data quality objective for ' this monitoring program is to obtain valid analytical results for 100 percent of the samples collected during the project. The completeness criterion will be 100 percent for field blanks and FCS. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 23 Salem,MA 11 a all ' Landfill Gas Field Screening Landfill gas migration is controlled by the refuse content, weather, barometric pressure, ' temperature, and moisture content of the soil. Fluctuations in landfill gas production are therefore common. ' There are currently no methane vents at the landfill. Testing of landfill gas is proposed for seven gas screening locations within and around the known limits of waste disposal at the landfill. Gas probes will be installed approximately four to five feet in depth, and will consist of one inch Watters tubing. Preliminary landfill gas screening will be performed using a GASTECH GX-82 and a PID. The GX-82 is a battery operated instrument. Approximate testing locations are given in Figure 4. ' Gas readings will be recorded, with the following information provided: • Name of sample • Date of Reading • Time of Day ' • Location of Reading • Weather Conditions ' The following soil gases will be quantitatively measured and recorded: • methane • hydrogen sulfide • % LEL • % oxygen • NOx ' • Total VOCs Ambient measurements of all of these gases will also be taken off site, to establish ' background air quality. Results will determine if further landfill gas monitoring is needed. If significant concentrations of gas are detected, additional probes and venting may be necessary. Once closure and capping are complete, gas migration will be altered, and a post ' closure monitoring plan will be implemented. Baseline Risk Assessment ' Based upon the results and interpretation of ground water, surface water, soil and sediment ' sampling and analyses, a baseline risk assessment will be conducted to determine potential risk to human and environmentally sensitive receptors by contamination emanating from the site. ' The baseline risk assessment will review pathways of human exposure to possible risks associated with the landfill. Risks will be quantified for exposure to groundwater, surface ' water, soil, sediment, landfill gas, and existing and final closure conditions at the site. Risks to nearby sensitive receptors and sensitive ecosystems will also be addressed. The data which is generated will be used to calculate baseline risk. ' 24 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem,MA ; ' 2.6 Health and Safety Plan A health and safety plan will be developed to address site activities and will be submitted to DEP prior to CSA tasks. ' A Health and Safety plan will be submitted to the Department prior to the initiation of field activity. This plan will be developed in order to protect individuals who will either be performing specific work at the site, or who could be affected by certain activities which are ' being performed at the site. Accordingly, the plan will conform with all applicable Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) standards, and the necessary levels of protection. Included in the safety plan will be: • Background information • Known hazards • Site location and location of emergency facilities ' • Site layout • Personal protection requirements/decontamination requirements e Contaminant monitoring t • Contaminant containment • Emergency procedures ' • Personnel responsibilities Y Training • Available communications ' A safety officer will be charge of health and safety during all project activities at the site. This person will ensure that all personnel have a copy of the health and safety plan, have ' read and understand the plan, and are complying with its requirements; that safety equipment is on-site and in working order; that personnel have been trained in the use of safety equipment and applicable site rules; that contaminant monitoring is carried out in ' accordance with the plan; and that accident prevention programs are complied with. Emergency telephone numbers and addresses will be identified for local fire, police, rescue, ' ambulance departments, and the nearest hospital. The travel route to the hospital will be determined, mapped and documented. The nearest telephone to the landfill will also be identified. The Health and Safety Plan will be submitted to DEP at least ten (10) days prior to site work, drilling and monitoring activities. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 25 Salem,MA ;1 M., 2.7 CSA Tasks' S and Schedule The following tasks are proposed in the CSA. In addition, a schedule is proposed, based ' upon the tasks identified in the proposed SOW. Tasks and schedule times are dependent upon DEP approval of the CSA SOW. ' - -2<)6Z CSA Project Schedu e ' Task J Z A S O ontlb Af A 01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' Preliminary site work X Monitoring system design, planning X X Health and safety plan X ' Well Installation X Hydraulic conductivity testing X ' Mapping X X Sample&analyze(quarterly) X X X X groundwater ' Prepare draft report X X X X Prepare final report X X X X ' Submit final report X ' Note: Month 1 begins upon DEP approval 26 Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work Salem MA ' 2.8 Draft and Final CSA Report Submittal The draft CSA report will be prepared, summarizing the results of CSA activities. The report will include an evaluation of surface and groundwater quality with respect to background quality, and an evaluation of site hydrogeology. An evaluation of potential risk to environmental and human sensitive receptors, identified in the ISA, will also be conducted. ' Hydraulic conductivity and piezometric data will be interpreted and calculated, allowing for conclusions to be made regarding geologic stratigraphy. ' A mass water balance will also be conducted for the site, to determine the quantity of water which infiltrates the landfill, potential leachate plume(s), and quantities of surface water runoff. Additionally, possible surface water flow paths will be studied. An updated plan (1" = 50') will be prepared, showing all the new monitoring wells and soil boring locations, surface water and landfill gas sampling locations. Groundwater contours and flow direction will be shown to reflect subsurface groundwater flow during seasonal high and low groundwater elevations. ' Cross sections (2) will be provided to show bedrock contours and vertical flow lines of groundwater during seasonal high and low flow periods. Tables will be provided in the report to summarize analytical and field screening results, hydrogeologic conductivities, ' water table and piezometric elevation data and geophysical and geologic boring and monitoring well construction data. In addition, as built drawings for monitoring wells and borehole abandonment procedures will be provided. ' The draft CSA report* will also include a baseline risk assessment. This is intended to identify potential sensitive receptors, including human and environmental exposure points. ' It will also identify concentrations of contaminants of exposure that were detected. Finally, the potential for contamination to reach sensitive receptors will be conducted. These results will determine whether a more detailed risk assessment should be undertaken, and will ' allow for a corrective action design to commence. The draft CSA report will be submitted to DEP, Division of Solid Waste Management. The DEP will review and approve the report, with conditions as necessary. An approval letter t will be sent to the City of Salem and NCI. Upon approval of the draft CSA report, comments and recommendations by DEP will be addressed and included in the final CSA report. Additionally, the Final CSA Report will include a scope of work for the final Corrective Action Alternatives Analysis (CAAA), if ' required. *An Interim Draft CSA Report may be submitted based upon analyses of two quarterly samples. This report would need to supplemented with additional data as quarterly samples and analyses are obtained. This is ' proposed due to the landfill cease of operation sometime in the late 1960s. ' Comprehensive Site Assessment Scope of Work 27 Salem,MA t ' Attachment A ' ORDER OF SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 1). MOISTURE CONTENT—"DRY", "MOIST', OR"WET' ' 2) SOIL DENSITY (OR CONSISTENCY) PENETRATION RESISTANCE GUIDE COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS VERY LOOSE 0-4 BLOWS/FOOT VERY SOFT 0-2 ' BLOWS/FOOT LOOSE 1-10 SOFT 24 " MEDIUM DENSE 10-30 MEDIUM STIFF 4-8 " ' DENSE 30-50 STIFF 8-15 " VERY DENSE 50+ VERY STIFF 15-30 " HARD 30+ 3) COLOR—"BROWN", "GRAY", "BLACK",ETC. ' 4) MAJOR COMPONENT—COMPOSES MORE THAN 50%OF THE SAMPLE. THIS SHOULD BE CAPITALIZED (COARSE SAND, INORGANIC SILT, FINE GRAVEL,ETC.) ' 5)MINOR COMPONENT—COMPOSES SAMPLES CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLLOWING TERMS: "AND": 40%TO 50% OF THE MINOR GRAIN SIZES "SOME": 10%TO 40% OF THE MINOR GRAIN SIZES "TRACE": LESS THAN 10%OF THE MINOR GRAIN SIZES EXAMPLE: (10%-40%) (LESS THAN 10%) MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE BROWN FINE SAND S�ORGANIC SILT TRACE F CLAY 1 2 3 4 5 5 1 UNU93 ' VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF SOILS Grain Size: (According to AASHTO Designation M 146-70 (1980) - On the Basis of grain size, soils ' are divided into the following classes: ' Sieve Sizes Grain Sizes Passing Retained In Millimeters Gravel - Coarse 3" 1" 75.0 25.0 ' Gravel - Medium 1 3/8 25.0 9.50 Gravel -Fine 3/8" #10 9.50 2.00 ' Sand - Coarse #10 #40 2.00 0.425 Fine #40 #200 0.425 0.075 Silt 4200 0.075 0.002 Clay Smaller than 0.002 mm ' Colloidal Clay Smaller than 0.001 mm ' Several entries are made to describe a soil according to grain size: The first entry represents the predominating type of soil contained in the sample. This should be capitalized in each case, such as COARSE SAND,FINE GRAVEL, SILT, etc. ' The second entry indicates the second and/or third component material. The amount of this material should be indicated by the consistent use of the following words: ' 'and" 50% to 40% of the secondary component "some" 40%to 10% "trace" 10% or less A typical entry would read "SILT, some fine sand, trace of clay" for a sample which is largely silt with about 30%of fine sand and about 5%of clay. ' Fine Grained Soils: Those having a predominance of Silt and/or Clay. Coarse Grained Soils are those having a predominance of Gravel and/or Sand. Moisture Content: The relative moisture content of the ' soil at the time of sampling shall be designated as "dry", "moist", or"wet". Consistency: The consistency of the soil sample shall be described as follows: ' Fine Grained Soils: "hard", "medium", or"soft", as well as a designation as to whether or not the soil is"plastic"or"nonplastic". Course Grained Soils: "loose"or"compact" and a designation as to whether or not the soil is "cemented". i ' Hardpan: Some soil mixtures have been subjected to extremely heavy pressures and together with cementation and induration have formed so-called Hardpan. This term does not indicate the ' composition of the soil but amplifies the description of the Consistency of extremely compact soil. Color: The predominant color of the soil sample in the natural state shall be designated: "white", "brown", "yellow","red", "gray", "blue"or"black". ' Grain Characteristics: In Coarse Grained Soils or when marked grain characteristics are evident, the ' shape of the grain shall be indicated as: "flat", "sharp", and/or "round". The overall grading of the material shall be designated as""well-graded","poorly graded", or if the material is noticeably of one size, it should be designated as "uniform". ' Vegetable Muck and Peat: Vegetable mucks and peats are soil mixtures with varying percentages of organic and vegetable matter formed by decomposition of leaves, grasses and other fibrous materials. ' The color ranges from light brown to black. When mixture contains high percentage of vegetable material it is called peat. The soil content of the mixture should be identified and an estimate made of the amount of vegetable matter in the mixture. ' Other Designations: Certain materials may be incorporated which do not fall under the foregoing classifications and which require further qualification for proper identification. Additional terms may be specifically designated as "rock fragments", "stones", "rock flour", or other qualifying descriptions. t n, rwn 1 1 ' FIELD OBSERVATION TO IDENTIFY SILT AND CLAY CHARACTERISTICS ' The field tests listed in the table below may be used to distinguish between the structural characteristics of a silt or clay soil. If the fine grain soil is a mixture of silt and clay, the following tests will indicate whether or not the predominating characteristic of the mixture is silt or clay. 1 Characteristics Silt Clay Plasticity in the moist state. Very little or no plasticity. Plastic and sticky and can be rolled. Cohesiveness in dry state. Little or no cohesive strength in Has a high dried strength. It ' dry state and will crumble and crumbles with difficulty and slake readily. slakes slowly in water. ' Visual inspection and feel. Coarse silt grains can be seen. Silt Clay grains cannot be feels gritty when rubbed between observed by visual inspection. fingers. They feel smooth and greasy when rubbed between fingers. ' Settlement in water. Will settle out of suspension within Will stay in suspension in one hour. water for several days unless it floculates. Movement of water in the voids. When a small quantity of silt is When a small quantity is ' shaken in the palm of the hand, shaken in the palm of the water will appear on the surface of hand, it will show no signs of the soil. When shaking is stopped, water movement out of the water will gradually disappear. void. 1 1 Attachment B ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES/DETECTION LIMITS Analyte Method Number Method Detection Limit ' Alkalinity 310.1 2.0 Nitrate,Nitrogen 353.2 0.1 ' Total Dissolved Solids 160.1 5.0 Chloride 325.2 1.0 Sulfate 375.4 10 ' Total Cyanide 335.2 0.005 Total Metals Prep. 200.2 N/A Arsenic 200.7 0.005 Barium 200.7 0.01 Cadmium 200.7 0.005 Chromium 200.7 0.01 ' Copper 200.7 0.01 Iron 200.7 0.01 Lead 200.7 0.05 ' Manganese 200.7 0.05 Mercury 245.2 0.0005 Selenium 200.7 0.005 ' Silver 200.7 0.01 Zinc 200.7 0.01 Volatile Organics 8260 varied ' Notes: 1) All method detection limits in mg/L. ' 2) Due to large number of volatile compounds tested,individual method detection limits are not listed. 3) One half of the MCL for each volatile compound will be used as the detection limit,where applicable. 1 � ' BETA GROUP, INC. TEST BORING REPORT ' PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B-1 LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA PAGE 1 OF I DRILLING CO: Carr-Dee Corp DATE STARTED: 3/15/2002 EQUIPMENT: Hollow Stem Auger DATE FINISHED: 3/15/2002 DRILLED BY: Joe Centrella-Carr-Dee SURFACE ELEVATION ' INSPECTED BY: James Smith-BETA GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS CORE CASING SAMPLER BARREL ' GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED TYPE: Split Spoon SIZE ID: 2" HAMMER WT: 140 lbs. HAMMER FALL: 30" :SAMPLE 'DATA DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMER BLOWS ON STRATA LITHOLOGY SAMPLE PEN/ HNU (ft) DEPTH SAMPLER(inches) ICHANGE1 (Description of materials) ID RECOV (ppm) FROM-TO 0.6 1 612 1 12-I8 1 18-24 1 (R) I 0-jin.) Lamp 10.2 eV. ' Ground Surface 0-2' 30 SAND:fine to medium grained,some gravel S-1 24/12 1 ppm 32 and cobbles,dark brown,dry,no odor 16 ' 17 5.0 ' 5'-7' 3 SAND:fine to coarse grained,some gravel,trace S-2 24/12 1 p m 3 cobbles,brown,dry,no odor 5 8 Auger refusal at 7'.End of boring. t 10.0 15.0 ' 20.0 GENERALREMARKS: 1 BETA GROUP,INC. TEST BORING REPORT ' PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B-2 LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA PAGE 1 OF 2 DRILLING CO: Cart-Dee Corp DATE STARTED: 3/15/2002 EQUIPMENT: Hollow Stem Auger DATE FINISHED: 3/15/2002 DRILLED BY: Joe Centrella-Carr-Dee SURFACE ELEVATION ' INSPECTED BY: James Smith-BETA GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS CORE CASING SAMPLER BARREL ' GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED TYPE: Split Spoon SIZE ID: 2" HAMMER AT: 140 lbs. HAMMER FALL: 30" =55AI1SRLE DATA DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMER BLOWS ONSTRATA LITHOLOGY SAMPLE PEN/ HNU (B) DEPTH SAMPLER(i-hes) CHANGE (Description of materials) D RECOV (ppm) FROM-TO 0-6 612 l2-IB 1 18-24 00 1 (in./w) lamp 10.2 eV. Ground Surface 0-2' 7 FILL:Sand mixed with ash,metal deposits,slag, S-1 24/12 0 ppm 16 plastic,glass. Fine to medium grained sand,fine ' 10 grained ash,dark brown/black color,cost color 18 associated with metals,dry,no odor 5.0 ' 5'-7' 3 FILL:Sand minced with ash,metal deposits,slag, S-2 24/15 1 ppm 3 glass. Fine to medium grained sand,fine grained 5 ash,trace organics,dark brown/black color,dry, 8 no odor 10.0 10'-12' 1 FILL:Sand milted with ash,metal deposits,slag, S-3 24/12 0 In 2 glass,trace possible ACM. Fine to medium grained ' 2 sand,fine grained ash,trace organics,black in 3 color,dry,no odor 15.0 15'-17' 1 FILL:Sand mixed with ash,metal deposits,slag, S4 10 9.8 pm 2 glass. Fine to medium grained sand,fine grained 2 ash,trace organics,black in color,dry,no odor 2 20.0 GENERAL REMARKS: Submitted Sample S4 for laboratory analysis of polynucleararomatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) ' and RCRA 8 metals. t BETA GROUP, INC. TEST BORING REPORT PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B-2(continued) LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA PAGE 2 OF 2 SAMPLE DATA DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMER BLOWS ON STRATA LITHOLOGY SAMPLE PEN/ HNU (ft) DEPTH SAMPLER(inches) CHANGE (Description of materials) ID RECOV (ppm) ' FROM-TO 0.6 1 612 1 12-18 1 1874 (fi) (in./in) Lamp 10.2 eV. 20'-20'9" 40 FILL:Sand mixed with ash,metal deposits,slag, S-5 9/73.8 ppm 100/3 glass,wood. Fine to medium grained sand,fine gained ash,trace organics,black in color,greenish color to wood,dry,no odor ' Auger Refusal at 21'. End of boring. 25.0 1 ' 30.0 t 35.0 40.0 GENERAL REMARKS: BETA GROUP,INC. TEST BORING REPORT ' PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B-3 LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA PAGE 1 OF 1 DRILLING CO: Carr-Dee Cap DATE STARTED: 3/15/2002 ' EQUIPMENT: Hollow Stem Auger DATE FINISHED: 3/15/2002 DRILLED BY: Joe Centrella-Carr-Dee SURFACE ELEVATION ' INSPECTED BY: James Smith-BETA GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS CORE CASING SAMPLER BARREL ' GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED TYPE: Split Spoon SIZE ID: 2" HAMMER WT: 140 lbs. HAMMER FALL: 30" :". SAMPLE DATA DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMER BLOWS ONSTRATA LTTHOLOGY SAMPIEpEN/ HNU (R) DEPTH SAMPLER(inches) CHANGE (Description of materials) ID RECOV (ppm) FROM-TO r 07 6-12 1 12-I8I8-24 (ft) (irt/in.) Lamp 10.2 eV. ' Ground Surface 0-2' 31 SAND:fine to medium grained,some gravel and S-1 24/8 Oppm 40 cobbles,rock fragments,light brown,dry,no odor ' 61 28 5.0 ' 5'-7' 1 FILL:Sand mixed with ash,glass,metal deposits, S-2 24/7 0 pm 2 slag. Fine to medium grained sand,fine grained 2 ash,trace organics,dark brown/black color,rust 1 color to metals,dry,no odor 10.0 10'-12' 7 FILL:Sand mixed with ash,glass,metal deposits, S-3 24/10 0 ppm 5 slag. Fine to medium grained sand,fine grained ' 3 ash,trace organics,dark brown/black color,rust 6 color to metals,dry,no odor ' End of boring at 12'. 15.0 20.0 GENERAL REMARKS: Submitted Sample S-3 for laboratory analysis of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) ' and RCRA 8 metals. BETA GROUP, INC. TEST BORING REPORT ' PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B4 LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA PAGE 1 OF 1 DRILLING CO: Carr-Dee Corp DATE STARTED: 3/15/2002 ' EQUIPMENT: Hollow Stem Auger DATE FINISHED: 3/15/2002 DRILLED BY: Joe Centrella-Carr-Dee SURFACE ELEVATION INSPECTED BY: James Smith-BETA ' GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS CORE CASING SAMPLER BARREL GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED TYPE: Spilt Spoon SIZE[D 2" HAMMER WT: 140 lbs. HAMMER FALL: 30" z SAMPLE DATA -l.. DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMER BLOWS ON STRATA LITHOLOGY SAMPLE PEW HNU (ft) DEPTH SAMPLER(mchea) CHANGE (Description of materials) ID RECOV (ppm) FROM-TO 0-6 612 12-18 18-24 (fl) (in./in.) Lamp 10.2 eV. Ground Surface 0-2' 6 FILL:Sand mixed with ash,glass,metal deposits, S-1 24/15 0 ppm 8 slag,plastic. Fine to medium grained sand,fine 7 grained ash,black color,rust color to metals,dry, ' 6 no odor ' 5.0 5'-7' 1 FILL:Sand mixed With ash,glass,metal deposits, S-2 24!7 0 ppm 2 slag. Fine to medium grained sand,some gravel 2 and cobbles,fine grained ash,black color,rust 7 color to metals,dry,no odor ' 10.0 10'-12' 7 No recovery. 24/0 11 ' 15 16 12'-14' 13 TILL:Fine to medium grained sand,some gravel, S-3 24/4 0 p m 8 large chunk of granite at head of spoon,dry, 18 no odor 25 15.0 ' 20.0 GENERAL REMARKS: Submitted Sample S-3 for laboratory analysis of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) ' and RCRA 8 metals. ' BETA GROUP,INC. TEST BORING REPORT 1 PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B-5 LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road Salem,MA PAGE I OF- 1 DRILLING CO: Carr-Dee Corp DATE STARTED: 3/15/2002 ' EQUIPMENT: Hollow Stem Auger DATE FINISHED: 3/15/2002 DRILLED BY: Joe Centrella-Carr-Dee SURFACE ELEVATION ' INSPECTED BY: James Smith-BETA GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS CORE CASING SAMPLER BARREL ' GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED TYPE: Split Spoon SIZE ID: 2" HAMMER WT: 140 lbs. HAMMER FALL: 30" ' - - SAMPLE DATA DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMER BLOWS ON STRATA LITHOLOGY SAMPLE PEN/ HNU (fl) DEPTH SAMPLER(inches) CHANGE (Description of materials) ID UCO (ppm) FROM-lb 0-6 6-12 12-18 I8-24 (fl) (in fin.I Lamp 10.2 eV. ' Ground Surface SAND:Fine to medium grained,some gravel and 8"-1'8" 3 cobbles,trace 611 materials,large chunk of granite S-1 12/7 0 ppm ' 3 rock,brown,dry,no odor 1'8"-2'8" 6 SAND:Fine to coarse grained,very well sorted, SAA 12/7 0 ppm 6 dark brown color,dry,no odor 5.0 5'-6' 4 SAND:Fine to coarse grained,very well sorted, S-2 12/7 0 ppm ' 9 dark brown color,dry,no odor 6'-6'3" 100/3 COBBLES:chunks of broken cobble,trace sand, __S-2A 3/3 0 ppm dark gay color,dry,no odor Aurger refusal at 65". End of boring. ' 10.0 1 15.0 ' 20.0 GENERAL REMARKS: ' BETA GROUP, INC. TEST BORING REPORT PROJECT: Salem Landfill ISA BORING NO. B-6 LOCATION: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem MA PAGE 1 OF 1 DRILLING CO: Carr-Dee Corp DATE STARTED: 3/15/2002 ' EQUIPMENT: Hollow Stem Auger DATE FINISHED: 3/15/2002 DRILLED BY: Joe Centrella-Carr-Dee SURFACE ELEVATION ' INSPECTED BY: James Smith-BETA GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS CORE CASING SAMPLER BARREL GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED TYPE: Split Spoon SIZE ID: 2" HAMMER WT: 140 lbs. HAMMER FALL: 30" - -: SAWLE DATA DEPTH SAMPLING HAMMERe1DWSON STRATA LIPHOLOGY S,47LE PEN/ 1p (R) DEPTH SAMPLER(inches) CHANGE (Description of materials) S,477 RECOV (ppm) FROM-TO 0-6 6-12 12-IS IS-24 (R) (inlia) lamp l0.2 eV. ' Ground Surface 0-2' 16 SAND:Fine to medium grained,some gravel and S-1 24/8 0 m 11 cobbles,sand dark brown,cobbles gray,light gray, 9 and rust colored,dry,no odor 7 5.0 ' 5'-6'6" 3 SAND,FILL:fine to coarse grained sand,some S-2 18/5 0 PPM 3 gravel,some glass,brown,dry,no odor 3 SAND,FILL:fine to coarse grained sand,some S-2A 6/6 0 ppm 6'6"-T 10 - gravel,some glass,brown,dry,no odor ' Auger refusal at 76". End of boring. ' 10.0 1 15.0 20.0 ' GENERAL REMARKS: 1 t CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET P.O. BOX 67 MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (617) 391-4500 To: BETA GROUP, INC. , NORWOOD, MA _ Date: 3-18-2002 Job No. : 2002-50 Location: 12 SWAMPSCOTT ROAD, SALEM, MA J Scale: , 1 in.= 3 ft. ' BORING 1 GROUND SURFACE S#1, Di to 2' (30-32-16-17) RECOVERED 12 in. F I L L SAN GGMVEL & S#2, 51 to 7' (3-3-5RED LOAM, RECOVERED 12 in. 9. - R E F U S A L - REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED WITH AUGERS NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SIZE OF AUGERS 2-3/4-1 I.D., LENGTH 910" DRILLER: JOSEPH CENTRELLA, INSPECTOR: JIM SMITH DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 3-15-2002 All samples have been visually classified by DRILLER. Unless otherwise specified,water levels need were observed at completion of borings,and do not necessarily represent Permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 incites using 140 Ibwe fit falling 30 inebes(J). Figures in reform to left (if noted)indicate number of Mews. to drive casing one foot,using 300 Ib.weigh falling 24 inches(±). Sheet I of 1. CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET P.O. BOX 67 MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (617) 391-4500 ' To: BETA GROUP, INC. , NORWOOD, MA Date: 3-18-2002 Job No. : 2002-50 Location: 12 SWAMPSCOTT ROAD, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 3 ft. ' BORING 2 GROUND SURFACE ' S#1, 0' to (7-16-10-8) RECOVERED 12 in. 5#2, 5' to 7- (20-16-11-7) RECOVERED 15 in. 1 F I LL LOAM, S#3, 10' to 12' GRAVEL, CINDERS, _ (1-2-2-3) RECOVERED 12 in. GLASS, WOOD, ' METAL S#4, 15' to 17' RECOVERED 10 in. S#5, 20' to 20'9" ' (40-100/311) 21' RECOVERED 7 in. - REFUSAL - REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED WITH AUGERS ' NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SIZE OF AUGERS 2-3/4" I.D., LENGTH 2110" DRILLER: JOSEPH CENTRELLA, INSPECTOR: JIM SMITH DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 3-15-2002 All samples have been visually classified by DRILLER. Unless otherwise specified,water levels noted were observed at completion of borings,and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figure'in parenWsis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch SPlit Sampler 6 inches using 140 Th.weight falling 30 inches(}). Figures in column to left (if noted)indicate number of blows to drive Casing one foot,using 3001b.weight falling 24 inches(t). ' - Sheet 1 of 1 ' CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET P.O. BOX 67 MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (617) 391-4500 To: BETA GROUP, INC- , NORWOOD, MA Date: 3-18-2002_ Job No. : 2002-50 Location: 12SWAMPSCOTT ROAD, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 3 ft- BORING 3 GROUND SURFACE ' S#1, 0' to 2' (31-40-61-28) RECOVERED 8 in. L--I—L--`- S#2, 51 to 7' (1-2-2 SAND. RECOVERED 7 in. GRAVEL LOAM. CI NDLR.� 1 ' GLA55 i S#31 10' to 12' ' (7-5-3 RECOVERED 10 in. 12' (7-5-3-6) NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SIZE OF AUGERS 2-3/411 I.D., LENGTH 10'0" DRILLER: JOSEPH CENTRELLA, INSPECTOR: JIM SMITH DATE STARTED 1, COMPLETED: 3-15-2002 l All samples have been visually classified by DRILLER.Unless otherwise specified,water levels noted were observed at completion of borings,and do not necessarily represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler 6 itches using 140 th.weight falling 30 incites(±). Figures in column to left (if noted)indicate number of blows in drive casing one loot,using 300 Ib.weight falling 24 inches(1). Sheet i of 1 ' CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET P.O. BOX 67 MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (617) 391-4500 ' To: BETA GROUP, INC. , NORWOOD, MA Date: 3-18-2002 Job No. : 2002-50 Location: 12 SWAMPSCOTT ROAD, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 3 ft- ' BORING 4 GROUND SURFACE ' S#1, Or to 2' (6-8-7-6) RECOVERED 15 in. S#2, 5' to 7- F I L L (1-2-2-7) RECOVERED 15 in. LOAM ' SAND, GRAVEL. STONES. CINDERS GLASS METAL 10' to 12' ' (7-11-15-16) RECOVERED 0 in. ' S#3, 12' to 14- (13-8-18-25) RECOVERED 4 in- 141 - REFUSAL - REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED WITH AUGERS NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SIZE OF AUGERS 2-3/4" I.D., LENGTH 14'0" DRILLER: JOSEPH CENTRELLA, INSPECTOR: JIM SMITH DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 3-15-2002 1 ' All samples have been visually classified by DRILLER. Unless otherwise specified,water levels noted were observed at completion of borings,and do not neeessanly represent permanent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indicate the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler G inches using 1401h.weight falling 30 inches(±). Figures in column to left (if noted)indieate numher M blows to drive casing one fum,using 300 Ibweight falling 24 inches ' Sheet 1 of 1 1 ' APPENDIX B 1 ' Soil Boring Logs 1 14263 1 t CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET P.O. BOX 67 NEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (617) 391-4500 To: BETA GROUP, INC. , NORWOOD, MA Date: 3-18-2002 Job No. : 2002-50 Location: 12 SWAMPSCOTT ROAD, SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 2 _ ft. ' BORING 5 GROUND SURFACE CONCRETE 8" S#1, 811 to 1'8" � E_L_—L (3-3) LOAM & RECOVERED 7 in. GRAKL 218" S#2A, 1'8" to 218" (6-6) RECOVERED 7 in. Meditm Dense, ' Meditnn SAND ' S4f2, 5' to 6' (4-9) RECOVERED 6 in- 61 * S#2A, 6" to 613" Ver Dense COA S 6'3" - R E F U S A L - RECOVERS REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED WITH AUGERS RECOVERED 3 in. ' NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SIZE OF AUGERS 2-374" I.D., LENGTH 610" DRILLER: JOSEPH CENTRELLA, INSPECTOR: JIM SMITH DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 3-15-2002 ' *GRAVEL. STONES i iI ' All samples have been visually classified by DRILLER.Unless otherwise specified,water levels noted were observed ai completion of borings,mid do not necessarily represent pemmnent ground water levels. Figures in parenthesis indieale the number of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Smolder 6 inches using 1401b. weigght falling 30 inches(±). Figura in win=to left (if rrotsJ)imtip[e number of bows to drive rasing one fool,using 30D lb.weight falling 24 inches(f). Sheet 1 of 1 CARR-DEE CORP. 37 LINDEN STREET P.O. BOX 67 MEDFORD, MA 02155-0001 Telephone (617) 391-4500 To: BETA GROUP, INC. , NORWOOD, MA - Date: 3-18-2002 Job No. . 2002-50 ' Location: 12 SWAMPSCOTT ROAD SALEM, MA Scale: 1 in.= 2 ft. BORING 6 GROUND SURFACE S41, 0' to 2- (16-11-9-7) RECOVERED 8 in. ILL SAND, ' GRAVEL, GLASS, PLASTIC S#2, 5' to 616" (3-4-4) RECOVERED 5 in. ' - S#2A, 6'6'r to 7' (10} RECOVERED 6 in. 716 - RE FUSAL - REFUSAL ENCOUNTERED WITH AUGERS ' NO WATER ENCOUNTERED SIZE OF AUGERS 2-3/411 I.D., LENGTH 716n DRILLER: JOSEPH CENTRELLA, INSPECTOR: JIM SMITH DATE STARTED & COMPLETED: 3-15-2002 All samples have been visually Classil icd by DRILLER.Unless otherwise specified,ware,levels noted were observed al Cmrg9euon of borings.and do not rimmaroy represent permanent gr000d water levels. Ftgores in panvda sos indicate the mother of blows required to drive Two-inch Split Sampler b inches using 140 Ib. eigght falling 30 inches(i). Figures in column to leli (if noted)indicate nwnber(it blows In drive ca.ing one loot,using tW Ib.weight felling 24 inches(i). Sheet 1 of 1 1 r � i i 1 APPENDIX C ' Photograph Log Photograph Log Project Name: Salem Landfill Initial Site Assessment ' Site Location: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA Project Number: 2037 By: J. Smith Date: 03/12/2002 l .sr r�y Photograph 1: View of landfill/transfer station from the southeast,facing northwest. Photograph 2: View of transfer station/former incinerator building during loading operations,facing northwest. c rs y '$(?1., .ext IMM Photograph 3: View of the northwestern portion of the site,behind transfer station,facing northwest. ' Photograph 4: View of waste storage containers stored on north-central portion of site. Portion of landfilla foreground. w ste in n r r 3: Z�ra Photograph 5: View towards southwestern portion of site,towards composting area. Landfill waste ' in foreground. Photograph 6: Closer view towards southwestern portion of site. 1 , I ' Salem Photolog.doc ' Photograph Log Project Name: Salem Landfill Initial Site Assessment Site Location: 12 Swampscott Road, Salem,MA Project Number: 2037 By: J. Smith Date: 03/12/2002 !r c t Photograph 7: View of composting piles located on the southwestern portion of the site. Photograph 8: View towards pond located to the southwest of the site from the composting area, facing southwest. R ' Photograph 9: View of landfill potion of site. Portion of landfill cut away in foreground to make room for trailer loading operation. Townhouse community in background to the southeast. Photograph 10: View of commercial buildings to the south of the site,facing south. Waste storage trailers located on the southern portion of the site. � Ae F 31 d w ' Photograph 11: View of compost materials stored on the landfill portion of the site,facing southeast. Photograph 12: View of truck weighing area,in background,located on the eastern portion of the site,facing southeast. ' Salem Photolog.doc ' Photograph Log Project Name: Salem Landfill Initial Site Assessment Site Location: 12 Swampscott Road, Salem,MA Project Number: 2037 By: J. Smith Date: 03/12/2002 yaw ; l� iY s. ' Photograph 13: View of southern portion of landfill area. Some composting materials evident. Photograph 14: View of two compactor"pits"located within the transfer station portion of the site. 71, 14 F h 1. 9 illi' haw Photograph 15: View of pit loading operations at the transfer station. ' Photograph 16: Closer view of one of the compactor pits. WO ' Photograph 17: View of waste loading operation at the rear of the transfer station. Compacted materials from the pits are loaded into trailers for hauling. Photograph 18: View of the rear of the transfer station/former incineration building. � I ' Salem Photolog.doc s ' Photograph Log Project Name: Salem Landfill Initial Site Assessment Site Location: 12 Swampscott Road,Salem,MA ' Project Number: 2037 By:J. Smith Date: 03/12/2002 CC�. y w ' Photograph 19: View of loading operations directly into a trailer for hauling,without compaction. Photograph 20: View of trailers located within cutout portion of landfill area. .r Photograph 21:View of Forest River,eidting from beneath a built up portion of roadway connecting ' the main portion of the site with the southwestern portion. Photograph 22: View of pipes located partially underground,located on the northeastern portion of the site,beside the former incinerator portion of the building. � r 110 d' Y r'hw4ArYHM.yflr r�,��y M4e4 fyb Ypres My .� 1' A MN IN b1rrJ M pyr_ N Iow9 WL} �� I'r��jl � [ AMMp MMIR MWNMfnMrMMM �f' flgth�4� MMaMkwWtnM �!ur Yes Crp -ry YpXFh WT RFLYMYMM14pPWr W)F n�V , � 1 Ir.vARLM M0YSr44YfYWluw W MMrJW i (�� ' 4+AWpFM M/Y+YY1YiY 4MY h 4 t ' ,*� W.pn. wY4 yWn.ox #vprA.ru * x�W aa.awbrYiry Mw�v ' Photograph 23: View of three perched transformers located on the northeastern portion of the site. Photograph 24: View of sign posting hours of operation,details regarding disposal and composting ' materials. ' Salem Photolog.doc ' APPENDIX D ' U.S. EPA Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)Request and Response 1 , BETA Group,Inc. tEngineers • Scientists • Planners ' March 29, 2002 Leah' Ms. Patricia y,Freedom of Information Officer U.S. EPA One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (RAA) ' Boston,MA 02114-2023 Dear Ms. Leahy: Under the Freedom of Information Act, I am submitting to you this request for any pertinent environmental information related to the property listed below: Salem Landfill/Transfer Station 12 Swampscott Road ' Salem, MA 01970 In particular, I am interested in knowing if this property is included in any EPA solid waste, waste management, or solid waste landfill databases. I agree to pay any fees incurred, should the expected cost exceed$25. ' I have included a map showing the approximate location of the property. Any information you could provide would be greatly appreciated. ' Thank you in advance for your help and consideration Ms. Leahy. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me at 781-255-1982. tSincere , ' mes Senior Scientist t t 1 ' RHODE ISLAND MASSACHUSETTS CONNEC71CUT e NaOalone Valley Place,Cmaoln,R1 02965 1420 Providence Highway,Sel1e 117,Norwood,MA 02062 B8D Howard Stmal,New Londw,CT 06520 401.333.2382 fa.401.333.9225 781.255.1982 tax:781.255.1974 860.437.0239 1=660.444.0274 SETA®BETA-eng.00m BETA@BETA-eng.com BETAInloSye.com 1 Ja�tfD STgr� 'Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I � JOHN F. KENNEDY FEDERAL BUILDING IL PRO,fO� BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02203-0001 1 April 19, 2002 ' CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Mr. James Smith ' Beta Group, Inc . 1420 Providence Highway Suite 117 tNorwood, MA 02062 Re: Freedom of Information Act Request 01-RIN-00245-02 . ' Dear Mr. Smith: This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act trequest of March 29 , 2002 . I wish to advise you that the Agency has no records responsive to your request . If you consider this response to be t a denial, you may appeal it by addressing your written appeal to the Freedom of Information Officer (A-101) , United States Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M. Street, S.W. , Washington, ' D. C. 20460 . Since y, ynd Boriskin, Foia Specialist, ' Office of Environmental Protection cc: Tricia Leahy, ' Agency FOI Officer ' Recycled/RecyclablePdnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%Recycled Paper(40%Postconsumer) 1 1 1 1 1 _ 7 1 ry, pos �„�� 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 i i i 1 1 F