2009 BOH CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Salem - Board of Health
Continuance of Public Hearing
November 24, 2009
Salem Transfer Station
Proposed Minor Mod cation to Existing Site Assignment
Before .................................. After
General
1. What is the purpose of tonight's meeting?
Tonight's meeting Is a continuation of the public hearing held on November 10, 2009, as
required by the Board of Health under the Massachusetts DEP's Site Assignment
Regulations. The Board of Health is seeking public comment prior to granting or denying
the request by the City and Northside Carting, Inc. to increase the allowable daily tonnage of
the existing transfer station from 100 to 400 tons per day.
2. A residence located at 1 DiPietro Road was identified after some of the environmental studies were
performed. Have the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed expansion of
the Transfer Station been assessed for this location?
Yes; prior air quality and noise modeling results have been reviewed and we have and
confirmed that projected Impacts to the residence at 1 DlPletro Road are well below
MassDEP thresholds for mitigation measures. Nevertheless, since the last public meeting,
Northside Carting has made formal arrangements to purchase the property at 1 Dipletro
Road and the adjacent property at 3 Swampscott Road. The Purchase and Sale Agreement
Is dated November 12, 2009.
Traffic Concerns
3. At the initial public hearing, the accuracy of the existing traffic count and the profile of the vehicles
using the transfer station were questioned. Specifically, it was mentioned that the estimated 140
vehicle trips (70 incoming and 70 outgoing vehicles) related to an annual average tonnage rate of
1
approximately 25 tons per day. What is the traffic related to the existing condition when 100 tons
per day is delivered to the station?
We first reviewed the records of actual tonnage delivered to the transfer station over the
time period when the traffic counts were made (November 19 and 21, 2007). The average
tonnage over the three-day period corresponding to the traffic counts was approximately 58
tons.
We then reviewed the average daily tonnage rate over the oast four years and determined.
based upon actual tonnage slips and annual reports to MADEP, that the average daily
tonnage rate was 43.2 tons per day(TPD). In our estimate of the existing traffic calculations,
we conservatively estimated that the existing traffic averages 50 TPD.
Therefore, the additional tonnage delivered to (and transferred from) the transfer station on
the peak day (500 TPD) is projected to Include larger vehicles (packer trucks and dump
trailers). Reference is made to the attached updated traffic generation matrix.
4. It is anticipated that future developments will be implemented in this section of Salem. How will
expansion of the transfer station impact such future developments?
The additional traffic generated at the proposed transfer station is relatively small and only
very minor impacts will be experienced In streets around the Swampscott Road area. In fact,
all of the existing trash collection vehicles that are currently serving the area will remain
under the future operating scenario. Rather than traverse other City streets to their current
destination(s),they will be routed to the new transfer station.
With respect to future traffic projections from new developments, site-specific mitigation
measures may be required (i.e. additional turning lanes, pavement markings, signalization
Improvements. etc.)
Air Quality Issues
5. The review engineer retained by the Board of Health requested that the Air Quality Model be
updated to include emissions from the proposed Transfer Station. Have the cumulative impacts of
stationary and mobile sources of particulates been taken into account?
The Air Quality Model was updated to Include emissions from the proposed Transfer Station,
Including modeling a 10-foot high stack and increasing the truck trips from 194 truck trips
per day to 230 truck trips per day to account for a dally peak of 500 tons per day.
Results from this additional modeling show that the projected emission levels from the
Transfer Station are negligible, compared to background and National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). These results are shown on the attached Particulate Emissions Chart.
6. According to the DEP 2006 Guidance Manual, the total Stationary Source Emissions and Inventory
System (SSEIS) VOC emissions should be considered from all point sources located within one
mile of the transfer station. What volatile organic compound emissions are released from facilities
within one mile of the transfer station?
The DEP's SSEIS Database lists one facility (Thermal Circuits, Inc.) within one mile of the
subject site. The annual VOC emissions from that facility for the most recent reporting year
(2007) are 6.39 tons per year. According to the DEP air quality representative that was
contacted, the additional VOC emissions from the proposed site will not have a perceptible
impact on regional air quality.
2
r
Otherlssues
7. At the last public meeting, concern was expressed regarding high groundwater table within two feet
of the waste handling area ground surface.
We have verified that the groundwater table Is located over 20 feet below the tipping floor
where waste is handled and at least 9 feet from the bottom of the loading floor of the transfer
station.
3
Salem Transfer Station
Trip Generation Matrix
Trips Est Avg. Existing Conditions Future Peak Conditions
Tonnage Peak Hour* Avg. & Peak Day Peak How* Peak Day
Dump Trucks
Incoming 1 .7 3 26 3 26
Outgoing 0 4 26 4 26
Cars/Pick-Up Trucks
Incoming - C&D 0.6 3 24 3 24
Incoming - Yard Wastes - 2 17 2 17
Outgoing 0 6 41 6 41
Packers
Incoming 15.2 0 0 3 29
Outgoing 0 0 0 4 29
Dump Trailers
Incoming 0 1 3 3 19
Outgoing 22.7 1 3 4 19
Subtotals...................................140.......................................90
Total Vehicles (Peak Day).......................................................230
"Peak traffic volume hour on a weekday which was found to occurr between 7:45 and 8:45 AM.
Particulate Emissions from Proposed Transfer Station
160 -
140 -
120 -
E
60140120E
100
c
0 80
w
m 60
v 40
20
0
PM2.5 PM2.5 PM10 PM10
24-1-18H Annual 24-1-121-1 Annual
■ Proposed Transfer Station ❑ Background ■ NAAQS
Notes:
1. Combined mobile and stationary sources modeled at closest residence.
2. The PMIO concentrations represent the highest second highest modeled concentrations, while the PMz e
represents the highest 5"' highest concentrations predicted.
3. Annual concentrations represent highest maximum concentration.