The URL can be used to link to this page

70-92 Boston Street - Phase 1 Initial Site Investigation and Tier Classification - 80 Boston Street - November 1988 lip, . ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INVESTIGATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAW- CHAPTER 21E AT 80 BOSTON STREET SALEM, - MASSACHUSETTS .SUBMITTED TO: JOHN FLYNN & SONS . 80 BOSTON STREET SALEM,; MASSACHUSETTS ' r SUBMITTED BY: SP ENGINEERING, INC. 27 CONGRESS STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS `'''��'4 s NOVEMBER 1988 �yM 4 KEEFE MECHANICAL N0. 33446 Q S1ONAIL . PreparQd by:.,: Reviewed by: _ HIV. William H. Mitche Leo T. Keefe , P.E. Field Engineer/Ceo ogist Professional Engineer T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Page 1 I . Introduction Figure : 1. Locus Plan 2. Site Plan 2A . Site Plan . 2B. Site Plan ii. Assessment. Rationale 1 5 III . Mbthods ' .IV. Surface and Subsurface Geology S 8 V. Tank Information 9 VI. Site `Use and History 11 VII. Areas of Concern VIII. Soil and Water Analysis Summary 14 IX. DEQE Spill File Review 16 1T X. Conclusions Barrel Inventory for Disposal. 22 u r e 3 . Soil Logs 4. Soil Logs 5. Soil Logs Tables-: 1. Metals Analysis 2. EP Tox Soil Analysis 3 . Volatile Organics Analysi-s 4. Volatile Organics An I. - Introduction The property being investigated is located at 80 Boston Street , Salem; Massachusetts . The front .side of the 'p.roperty abuts Boston Street and the back side abuts Goodhue Street. . The property covers 1. 67 acres, which includes a brick , one to three-story structure occupying approximately 60 percent of the site , with the remaining 40 percent being either asphalt or concrete. The site houses two major parking lots, one to the northwest and the remaining one beirig to t-he opposite southeast corner . The. property is totally enclosed with -a chain-l.ink On November 7 , 1988 , a site investiga-tion of the subsurface was conducted by SP Engineering , Inc. under. the supervision of William H. Mitchell Jr . , Field' Engi_neer/Geologist. Irk-house barrel inventory, review of process activities and present w.as.te hand-ling was supervised by Bruce M. Poole , President of SP Engineering , Inc. II. Assessment Rationale The building and surrounding -gropert.y has been subjected .to a comprehensive investigation to determine whether hazardous was.te . material.s and/or oils have been released or are contained or located; on the site -or in the soil. or groundwater. This report summarizes the conditions encountered on the buildings , grounds and subsurface soils., and groundwater . _The certification of materials and soils sampled involves the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA.) regulations for l z � c� v O w w � - SI � c "C A o G�! v W � ! � w . O o 0 o CD m ao O 4 m cn ' c o K -1 XCD m , n D m /T7 '�C �► m ti� � t b - c L X n � b O N 1 o Q F ? �G f- _ G�' v q W 'D arc -- '1 N. - O 1 G� 0 0 1 N N 000) V/. m . Z'o O M z m: D mrry Y `\C CD analysis of reactivity, corrosivit_y, ignitability and extraction procedure toxicity. The hazardous material investigations required tests for eight heavy metals in the soil and volatile organics- (VOA) , pH and conductivity in groundwater. . Since many .sites have been developed. only to discover that* wastes stored . below the ground continue to leach heavy metals or carcinogenic solvent fumes -that affect human health; the importance of complete . site studies is a financial necessity. Many construction techniques and treatment programs can eliminate the risk in 'industrial site development, but the problems have to be discovered by chemical analysi-s.. . Documentation of the size, character- and constituents of any previous landfill activity is essential to the determination of future impacts. The combination of test. cores , soil \ characterization, soil EP toxicity tests, and surface and J groundwater chemical analysis (if groundwater i's encountered) reveals the extent .of site contamination, if any. The enclosed discussion and engineering report presents the results of previous. industrial activity on the site and how it relates to future development potential. All applicable sites must be certified free of hazardous wastes and contaminated groundwater in order to obtain title insurance for the sale , remortgages or building addition to the property. This .site survey is conducted by an engineer who has had extensive experience handling the hazardous materials from tanneries, electroplaters , and other industries as well as the d.esig.n of wastewater treatment systems, sludge disposal 2 facilities and landfills . This experience includes a * variety of remedial site clean-up actions. All soils and groundwater are sampled according to EPA protocol and analyzed at SP, Inc. ' s in-house chemistry .laboratory in Salem , Massachusetts . ' All sites are subjected to cori-ngs and grounds survey to determine natural conditions and any areas of man-made fill or disposal. A material is considered hazardous if .it shows: l.. Ignitability - Having a flashpoint of less than 1400F; a- noniiquid liable to cause fires through friction, absorption. of :-noisture , spontaneous chemical change or retained_ heat from manufacturing or liable when ignited to burn so vigorously and persistently as to create a hazard ; ignitable compressed gases; oxidizers. 2. Corrosivity - Aqueous wastes exhibiting a pH of. less than or equal to 2 or greater than or equal. to 12. 5 and liquid wastes. capable of corroding -steel at a rate of greater than 0. 25 inches per year. 3. Reactivity - Readily undergo violent chemical change ; react violently or form potentially explosive mixtures with water ; generate toxic fumes when mixed with water (or when exposed to mild acidic or basic- conditions for sulfide or cyanide bearing wastes) , explode when subjected to a strong initiating force; explode at normal temperatures and pressures; or classified as Class A or B explosives. 4. Fail the EP Toxicity Tests - The Extraction Procedure (EP) Toxicity Test is designed to simulate the physical 3 processes which would occur in a landfill. To simulate the acidic leaching medium which occur in actively- decomposing landfills, EPA. chose' to employ acetic .acid. To simulate the leaching process , EPA specified a procedure requiring the mixing of the solid component of the wastes (soil in this instance) with -the acidic leaching medium for a period of 24 hours. To duplicate- the attenuation in concentration expected to occur between the point of leachate generation and the point of human or environmental exposure , EPA applied a dilution factor- of 100 to the concentration. of toxic constituents observed in the test extract. 5. Identified as a Priority Pollutant = The RCRA. legislation has classified a minimum of 125 organic and metallic, compounds as acutely hazardous to human health. As such, only extremely low levels are tolerated in the environment and .non-existence required for drinking water sources.. These compounds are detected by gas chromatograph and regulated` according to their level, mode of toxicity (i .e . oral, .dermal, inhalation) and health effec t (carcinogen, irritant, - or mutagen, ) . In all cases , there are chr.onic _ (long-term) concerns as well as acute (single-exposure] toxicities that have to be evaluated. III . Methods A. six-inch diameter auger coring device was used to penetrate asphalt or soil to refusal or several feet below the groundwater table. An engineer on site during excavation 4 characterized soil strata type_, depth, unnatural material quantities and groundwater levels. - This data is presented in the Soil Logs (Figures 3, 4, 5- & 6) . Any organic material, colored soil or landfill refuse is sampled as a worst- -case and .subjected to the . EP Toxicity Test. All analyses are performed according to Standard Methods 15th edition 1980, RCRA Regulations- E.P. Toxicity Extraction Procedures 1978 , .or .the EPA Method 602 for gas chromatographic analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons . Quality assurance and sample identification protocols ar-e in accordance with federal requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. (NPDES) , .^.d Clean Water Act of 1976. IV. Surface and Subsurface Geology The site is located within the Salem Quadrangle of the U.SGS- Topographic Map Series . Then topography of the site- is mostly . sloping .to the southeast according to the Quadrangle Map with an average elevation of 35 feet above sea level. Run-off floes in two major directions. The front side of the property abutting Boston Street, run-off is. to the southeast down Boston Street. On the back .s-ide of the property, run-off is to the northeast were . the North River presently exists . The area being investigated is approximately 1. 67 acres . One large conglomerate three-story brick building occupies approximately 60 percent of the site with the remaining 40 percent covered by concrete and asphalt. The asphalt/concrete areas are subdivided into three sections ; two of the areas are on the northwest and 5 southeast ends of the property abutting Boston Street with the remaining concrete area abutting Goodhue Street to the northeast. Surrounding the property is commercial/industrial to the northeast and southeast , residential to the northwest and southwest. The subsurface soils are believed to be all fill ranging from sand and gravel to rock.: The soil is part of the Urban Land-Udorthenis Association where soils have been altered or obscured by Urban .works and structures or where soil material has been excavated and redeposited. An. unknown quantity of brick and concrete footing slabs are present in the subsurface due to the remains of an old structure which burned many years ago. Subsurface soils were encountered in all aspha-lt/concrete areas. Priority areas. for drilling were near underground 1 petroleum tanks. / On the northwest end of the property, within the parking area and abutting Boston Street, contamination of #6 oil was encountered in Test Hole #1 and 46. Test Hole Al was highly contaminated with #6 oil, f.ree flowing at approximately 13. 5 feet. SP, Inc. drilled to a depth of 20 feet before abandoning Test Hole #1. -. It is likely that contamination continues to a depth greater than 20 .feet in Test Hole #1. Test Hole #6 was ` explored to determine -if any #6 oil had migrated downgradient from a 20, 000-gallon underground #6 oil tank. Contamination was encountered at 11 feet in Test Hole #6. Drilling was - stopped due to the lack of day-light. The extent of contamination is assumed to be widespread because of the porous. nature of the fill material. Also abutting Boston Street and to the southeast behind Dunkin . Donuts , SP, Inc. drilled Test Holes #-.3 and #4. within the asphalt .areas. Both Test Holes. had well sorted brown medium sand, fill. Subsurface soils in this area appeared .free of any contamination during testing . However, Test Hole#2, drilled 'to the east next to Goodhue Street, was contaminated with solvents from the 6, 000-gallon underground solvent tank upgradient .from ' the Test Hole. Further upgradient from. Test Hole #2,. SP, Inc. drilled two additional Test Holes, #7 and #8, on November 30, 1988. This area was investigated further due to the solvent detected downgradient from Test Hole #2. Test Hole #7 and #8 di-d .posses detectable volatiles possibly from. the solvent tank. . The HNU 'read'ings in the back lot ranged from 20 to 120 ppm. Due to the mu.lti-contaminated areas on site, the augering. equipmerit was. steam cleaned after each encounter with contamination. Groundwater was encountered -in Test Hole #2, which was the Closest boring to the North- River at approximately .8 feet. Groundwater did possess quantities of volatiles believed to be solvent from the suspected leaky underground tanks. The type of solvent used as a degreaser in sheepskin leather manufacturing is called Stoddard ' s solvent . It is a complex mixture of straight and branched chain paraffins , naphth.enes and aromatic hvdrocarbons. A petroleum distillate, it is also called mineral. spirits and has a kerosene odor . It is insoluble in water (specific gravity 0. 79) and boils between 1540C and 2020c (not very volatile) (see attached fact. sheet in the- Appendix) . 7 V. Tank Information Information. concerning any petroleum storage containers on-site was acquired from multiple interviews with employees and a visit 'to the Salem Fire Department. . According to John Keenan, .Manager and 31-year employee of John Flynn & Sons , the following tanks exist on-site. . 1. (1) 20, 000-gallon #6 fuel oil underground tank located in .the northwest parking lot abutting Boston Street. 2. (2) 275-gallon #2 fuell oil aboveground tanks located within the shiping room on the northwest corner of the building. 3. (3) 275-gallon. 12 fuel oil aboveground tanks located within the maintenance shop abutting Goodhue Street to the east. 4. (1) 6, 000-gallon solvent undergro.und tank located between the maintenance shop and the boiler room within the driveway area. 5. (1) 10, 000-gallon -abandoned #6 fuel oil underground tank located in. the, boiler room abutting Goodhue Street. 6.. Other tanks on site ', non-petroleum, involved in effluent treatment, are mixing tanks , clar-ifier, sludge storage, solvent recorvery; caustic soda, alum and polymer. These tanks are -above ground fiberglass or steel vessels that will be sold. off as part of a treatment system. 7 . Various steel and fiberglass above ground tanks exist throughout the factory for the storage of process chemicals , These include vessels for salt brine , formic acid, trivalent chromium (15% solution) and fat liquors .- While these are not hazardous wastes, the chemicals would still have to be returned to -the seller and the tanks cleaned before. being sold. 8. Wastewater from the tan and color. processes are collected in four below floor concrete pits.. These pits and associated trenches generally contain accumulations of sludge that have low levels of chromium., phenolics and solvents. While these are not hazardous wastes,' they- still require cleaning , dewatering and disposal in a "special" landfill. VT_. Site Use & History The site, for the past 68 years , has been utilized, according to -an interview with 31 year employee Jo.hn .Keenan and A Deed Search at the Salem Registry. of Deeds , for the manufacture of lea-then from pickled sheepskin stock. John Flynn and Sons, at one time , was a world leader in processing sheepskins into finished garment leather . The manufacturing. activities require many .chemical baths to- prepare the skins and color the leather. This facility did not remove the hair from the skins , but utilized dehaired acid-pickled raw stock from New Zealand. According to the Deed Search, the buildings and land were p-urchased from 19.26 to 1950. The following section shows the . number of purchases made to acquire the existing property. November 2,. 1928, Mr. Flynn purchased the . three-story structure from Bernard J. Mulligan, where the business originally began. In addition to. this , Mr. Flynn purchased the additional buildings and land from Joseph Pol.ansky in. 1935, Charles -Kokoras in March of 1936, Lena -Mahoney in September 1936 , William C.- Norton in July 1947-, Joseph Polansky in May 1948 and finally Charles Kokoras in August 1950. During this time period and up to the present, John Flynn & Sons has generated several distinct wastewater operations associated with leather proc-essing. Included in these processes were solvent degrease, tan, blue soak , retanning, fat liquoring, coloring and finishing . Chemical analyses have been conducted regularly to characterize daily wastewater, sludge and process wastes . Treatment system operation has allowed compliance with Local and Federal effluent discharge limits since I980. The .wastewater is prescreened, chemically coagulated and settled in a primary clarifier. End products from proces-sing such as grease and chrome trimmings are either recycled or sold. to other industries. The final effluent is discharged to the SESD Municipal Sewer System for further wastewater treatment before discharge into Salem Harbor. Primary sludge is dewat.ered by a filter press and disposed of in a special landfill. Also stored in the building area large number of 55-gallon drums and paper barrels (10 -to 20) that contain outdated chemicals ; finish mixes , fly ash , still bottoms and unknowns . Some of these materials are being returned to the sellers and others are not hazardous. A full barrel inventory 'is being prepared to identify the waste streams, label the barrels and schedule disposal by a licensed hazardous waste firm. The facility is presently being considered for resale. The facility is presently under-going a clean-up operation . Clean-up includes selling all pretreatment. materials and machinery. While on-site, SP, Inc. observed clean-up operations .. The tannery still needs more maintenance, including 10 floor cleaning of chemical spills and sludge clean-up in trenches and pits throughout the basement of the building.. Sp, Inc. would request a site revisit when Flynn & Sons have finished the clean-up of the facility to determine if any hazardous waste remains on-site. VII. Areas of Concern There are multiple areas of hazardous waste contamination which were visually observed in the subsurface soils during Sp, Inc. 's site investigation. 1. Test holes #1 and #6 , within the parking area, located on the northwest end.. of the site , was highly contaminated with #6 fuel oil... Apparently the 20, 000-gallon#6 fuel oil tank is leaking. The steel tank is 38 years old according to the Salem Fire Department. SP, Inc. drilled to a depth of 2.0 feet and discovered #6 fuel oil at approximately 13 to 20 feet . The oil flowe-d freely into the boring up to 15 feet. HNU readings ranged from 16 to 70. ppm's . Test Hole #6 was explored downgradient from the 20, 000-gallon #6 fuel oil tank to determine potential migration of the fuel oil. Soi-1 - contaminated with fuel oil was discovered at ll . feet. The source of contamination within Test Hole #6 .is believed to be from migrated #6 .fuel oil that originated in the upgradient 20, 000-gallon. in-ground tank. The porous nature of the sand and gravel found in this area would indicate that the extent of contamination is widespread. The fill material from grade to 11 feet down, did not appear contaminated. The steep grade on the 11 north side of this parking lot did not show any evidence of seepage or oil migration. 2. Abutting Goodhue Street and between the maintenance shop and the boiler room, Test Hole #2 produced high volatile organics . Discovered at approximately 7. feet was possible solvent contamination from the upgradient 6 ,000-gallon in-ground solvent tank. HNU readings with headspace analysis techniques measured 180 ppm's . The Stoddard 's solvent (mineral. spirits) be-iiev.ed to be present in the soil is insoluble in water and does not evaporate readily. As mentioned previously, almost the entire site. is paved or covered with concret-e. A tidal canal., the North River , exists downgradient approximately 200 yards from the site. There is a potential risk that the solvent material may migrate to the river. The river is, however , a Class D. waterbody with no recreational or shellf.ishing activities. There are no wells downgradient of the property and- no mechanism by which the solvent could become surface- run-off. 3. Beneath the boiler room there is a 10,000-gallon abandoned_ #6 fuel oil in-ground tank. This tank, was- believed to be leaking when it's use was discontinued in- 1973. The tank was installed in 1939 . SP, Inc. was _un-able to test the soils around the tank because they are under a building. Even the adjacent loading dock is covered by a thick concrete pad. The oil, if present , is well contained and .does not pose any immediate risk to human health . If the buildings were demolished and new foundations were excavated, then the oil and l soil would have to be removed and properly contained in a secure / landfill. 4. The presence of waste barrels (10 to . 20) in the building necessitates further- inventory, identification and labeling. John Flynn and Sons has -followed the RCRA regulations in the regular disposal and manifesting of routinely- produced hazardous waste streams that consist of still . bot,toms , boiler ash, finish mixes and spent-_ laquers. Many of the barrels remaining are. not listed hazardous wastes (RCRA 45 CFR Section 261. 31) , but process chemicals that may or may not be usable. Because of 'certain constituents, they will have to be. incinerated or disposed of in a secure landfill. Overall, these concerns have not interLerre.d with the present industrial use of the property. Occupational exposure to the subsurface soils is negligible; therefore , there has not been, nor is there an imminent threat of any deleterious impact on human health and safety. The industrial. hature of the entire area and -present condition of the North River also indicates that there is minimal potential for 'environmental harm. Effective containment of these contaminated soils could allow .continued industrial use of the property. Any. construction or excavation would require soil removal.. VIII. - Soil and- Water Analysis Summary Soil sampling was. conducted with a hollow stem continuous flight auger with a split-spoon sampling device for each Test Hole. Samples were taken every foot as material was brought to the surface. with the auger flights.. Each sample was analyzed for strata and lithology changes. While on site, samples were 13 then composited into one- approved DEQE container per Test Hole 1 for further .chemical analyses. During drilling, the soil samples did possess obvious volatile qualities, excluding Test -Holes 14 and 15 which had no. hydrocarbon volatiles. The drilling continued until refusal (ledge or boulders) was reached or 5 feet below groundwater. A multi-triangular boring configuration and the previously -obtained subsurface information aided in the determination of test holes relative to the site. Each test hole composite was sub.jected .to Extraction Procedure Toxicity testing - (EP Tox) . Three- EP Tox samples were tested. Soil samples from Test Hole #l .were tested as one unit. Soil samples from Test Hole #2 and. #3 were composited together as the second uni-t, and soil samples from Test Hole #.5 and #6 as the third EP Tox unit. All EP Tox 1 results were free of' any 'haza.rdous heavy metals. The amount of oil in the soil in the upper parking- lot ranged 'from 8. 0% worst case Hole #1, 6. 3% composite Hole 11 and- 1: 33% worst case Hole #6. Hole #6 is 25 feet downgradient of the oil tank and is .believed to represent (within 10 feet) the extent of oil migration. This is important because with industrial sites up to 1. 0% oil is not considered hazardous .and can remain on-site. Soil contaminated with #6 fuel- oil from Test Hole #1 was tested for Organochlorine Pesticides and PCB ' s. All results from these tests were non-detectable. A VOA (volatile organic analysis) was also conducted on the oil within Test Hole #1. Detectable compounds were benzene at 12500 mg/l and ethylbenzene ) 14 at 930 mg/l. Additional VOA were concentrated on Test Hole #2.. Soil sample's had 254 ug/kg benzene , 119 ug/kg ethylbenzene, 57 ug/kg toluene and 85 ug/kg xylenes . Groundwater was encountered in only Test Hole #2 (back solvent tank area) . A VOA -indicated 1870 ug/l benzene , 94 ug/kg ethylbenzene, 15 ug/kg toluene -and 42 ug/1 xylenes. Oil and grease levels were 0. 12% , and not a problem, in this area. Two of the above contaminants have been recorded with the .. Federal Register of Concerned Pollutants-, Volume 45, -No. 23. The following is stated wi.th.in this volume. A. Benzene, Saltwater Aquatic Life : The available data for Benzene - indicates that acute toxicity to saltwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low -as 5, 100 ug/l and would occur at lower concentrations among species that are more sensitive than those tested. B. Toluene, Saltwater Aquatic Life: The available data for Toluene indicates that acute and chronic toxicity to saltwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low-.as 6, 300 and 5, 000 ug/l, respectively, and would occur at lower concentrations among species that are more sensitive than those tested. IX. DEQE Spill File Review 1. According to the DEQE Incident Fi-les, at 2 Goodhue Street, on the corner of Goodhue and Bridge , a release -was 15 reported in April 1987, Case #3-0427 . The lot is utilized as-:a parking lot and owned by James Weever of. JHW Corporation. The source of contamination is believed to be from P. Claiman, who has a 55 year old 10,000-gallon concrete underground tank . According to Jim Weener, the tank was pumped and cleaned this summer . A site assessment was conducted. by Target Environmental Service in April 1987 showing . high fuel oil, diesel or kerosene in .concentrations up to 21 ppm: The case is presently pendin.g. 2. Located . at 12 Hanson Street; ,and not recorded in DEQE Incident Files, just northwest from John Flynn & Sons , SP, Inc. conducted a site investigation for Beverly Leather Corporation in March 1987. The site investigation discovered high lead at greater than 5 mg/l, oil and grease at .17. 5 percent and total volatile organics of 39.20 ug/1 within Test Hole #2. The source of contamination is believed to be. the finishing air .exhaust of the past operation. Remedial action was conducted on April 22, 1988 by SP, Inc. SP, Inc. supervised the removal of 120 . 15 tons of contaminated soil_. The soil was transported by Total Waste Management Corporation, Newington, New Hampshire (US EPA ID #NHD980521843) to Sawyer Environmental. Recovery of .Hampden, Maine. X. Conclusions It is evident that the. property has been exposed to discharges of hazardous materials. This being the case , we cannot certify the property free of hazardous materials . The magnitude of release also means that. DEQE will have to be 16 notified according to MGL Chapter 21E Two major areas on the site should -be. subjected to remedial. action, with an additional area of probable #6 fuel oil contamination dealt with if the building is demolished (see Site Plan) . Within the building, more areas of concern -exist such as; sludge filled trenches , chemical spills on floors and the remaining barrel inventory. It may be concluded that the hazardous constituents present in . the soils and groundwater (Test Hole #2) do not, at the- present , pose a threat to human health or the environment.. This is due to the fact that no drinking water wells or natural resources exist in the area. However, subsurface environmental problems obviously exist. Groundwater was found in only one Test Hole (#2) .. This hole is believed to contain solvents from the.' upgradient in-ground tank. These solvents could be migrat.in.g to the North River . The two #6 fuel oil releases should be contained (non-migrating) due to the high viscosity_ of the petroleum product. The sources of #6 fuel oil contamination are suspected to be from the in-ground tanks . . The in.-ground 2O, 000-gallon, tank, t6 fuel oil, on the northwest corner of the site, was installed and inspected on July 8, 1950 . The abandoned 10,000-gallon tank , #6 fuel. oil, beneath the boiler room, was installed and inspected on . December 1, 1939 . The 20, 000-gallon tank is still in use to heat the major portion of the building. Although the contaminate levels are in excess of the limits set by DEQE, it is still unclear on how to treat this site' s 17 specific problem. According to DEQE, any soil contaminated with virgin petroleum products reading greater than 10 ppm' s of volatiles with the HNU meter, should be removed. It must be emphasized that this is. not a fixed standard and DEQE may allow site specific alternative remedial goals whenever it is deemed appropriate. : At this point, SP, Inc. would recommend soil and tank removal and an effective in-situ treatment such as recovery wells to treat the solvent area groundwater. To confirm our recommendations , we must. submit this report to DEQE with a waste contingency plan for further approval. The occupational .exposure limits (OSHA) for benzene _ in air is 10 ppm. •Levels of 50- to 70 ppm were encountered in the test cores , but were not evident at the surface of the property. Excavation would be the only mechanism by which workers would be exposed to the threshold levels. Removal and stockpiling of the soil would be conducted under the supervision of an engineer and safety precautions such as organic vapor- masks. (for workers in the excavation) and plastic covering of material would be -followed. As described in the Soil Logs , -the layer. of contaminated material is covered by 7 to 11 feet of clean fill. This also minimizes the risk of direct human contact. Although there is no current danger of migration or further exposure , the contaminated soil must be removed and .properly disposed of in a licensed landfill. This is a common procedure that can be accomplished safely over a period of several months . Portable volatile meters can identify the contaminated material ) 18 during excavation for isolation on plastic. The stockpiled soil will also be completely covered with plastic. Composite soil samples will be. taken, after excavation is complete for laboratory analyses that are required for landfill acceptance. Once acceptance is received (2. to 4 weeks) , the material would be loaded onto licensed trucks and hauled away. The top 7 to 11 f-eet of Olean fill will be. removed to the side and returned to the hole -after the contaminated soil is .excavated. Soil samples of the bottom and sides remaining in the excavation will be taken to confirm that all contaminated material +133 =f'TOL'ed . DEQE. and other parties will receive all chemical analyses , manifests and. a final report documenting the' remedial action. The quantity of oily material to be removed from the parking lot is estimated at 1100 cubic yards (60 ' x 6:0 ' x- 8-1 average thickness, to below groundwater) . This would represent an expenditure of $1"70, 500. 00 at. $155/ton, if .the material had to be taken to the Sawyer Environmental facility in Maine. However , chemical tests do not indicate any solvent or heavy metal contamination, so the ' mate.rial could be taken to Brock' s. Asphalt Plant in Dracut, Massachusetts at $90/ton for $100 ; OOO. 00. t6tal . The solvent contaminated soil. in the back of the building will also have to be removed or encapsulated. The soil from the groundwater to beneath the pavement contains varying amounts of solvent. The average soil depth is 5 to 8 feet before refusal (ledge) . The estimated quantity of soil (roughly 100 , x 30 ' x 19 61 ) is 700 cubic yards. Large material (rock and concrete) can ) remain on-site if not saturated with solvent-. Solvent disposal requires transport to a secure landfill in New York -or South Carolina. -The cost is approximately $225/ton or $160,000.00 if ail material has to :go. Since the site is not being considered for -residential construction, some low level material could remain on-site if sealed to prevent future migration to the North River. The barrels. on-site, after characterization, can be disposed of at a rate of $20.0 to $350 per drum, depending upon t'::e .Tiat2riciiS . Tt is not anticipat.ed that removal would COSt -more than $7, 000. 00. for 20 barrels. After soil removal and backfill in the solvent area, we would recommend the installation of two. (4") groundwater recovery wells. The groundwater would -be pumped to'- granular activated carbon filters for removal of the remaining soluble petroleum compounds. Groundwater , .-after carbon absorption, should contain less than 5 ug/1 of- benzene and would be returned to the ground on the property upgradient of the wells. This continuous process will clean the groundwater and flush remaining material from the soils over a period- of 3 to 9 months . Monthly analyses 'of the wells will document the remediation. The installation and operation of this equipment (and -final carbon . disposal) is estimated to .cost $16, 000. 00 to $18, 000. 00. The large 20, 000-gallon fuel oil tank and 6, 000-gallon solvent tank need to be removed, . cut open, wiped clean and 20 transported for dispos.al .as scrap steel. 'This operation will allow access to surrounding. soil.- It is estimated to cost $20, 000. 00 to complete the tank removal job. Excavation of contaminated. soi-is,- with engineering supervision and chemical .. analysis would cost approximately $20, 000 to $30 , 000. .The total backfill- material (1800 cy 3 $8/cy) and resurfacing of the excavated areas would cost an estimated $2Q, 000 .to $25, 000. The remediati-on proposed- (all items) would cost an estimated $360 , 000. 00 (worst case). , depending on subsurface conditions encountered. Outlined below are the conventional -t.echniques and costs used for this �.ype of -contamination. ESTIMATED REMEDIAL COSTS , WORST CASE A. #6 fuel oil soil contamination front parking lot disposal of 1100 cubic yards: @ $9Q/ton: Brock 's Asphalt- Plant $1001000.00 B . Solvent- contaminated soil disposal of .700 .cy @ $225/ton. Model City, New York ,$160 , 000. 00 C . . Barrel removal. .20 @ $350/barrel $ 7,000.00 D. Solvent area, groundwater . recovery :wells (2) ,' and monthly monitoring (9 mon. ) $ 18, 000.00. E. Tank removal , cleaning and disposal one 20,000-gallon #6 one 6 , 000-gallon. solvent $ 20, 000. 00 E. Soil excavation, engineer my supermis.ion and chemical analyses:. DEQE permit MCP and final report $ 30, 000. 00 G. Clean backfi.11ing material 1800 cy @ $8/cy in-.place, compacted and resurfaced: with asphalt $ 25, 000. 00 Total $360,000.00 21 -There are. other methodologies that can be used to remediate 11 an industrial site such as this: Some of them will save money, J but would result i.n- a site condition that would be unsuitable For residential housing. At this time, the property is being marketed - for commercial use or warehouse activity. The zoning is also industrial/commercial and not likely to. change in the near future since there are many industries nearby. It is anticipated that the old section of the building would be demolished and a new structure built in its place, without a lot of new foundation work. These considerations mean that the 76 fuel oil contaminated soil at a level of 1% .or less can remain in the ground. The section would be sealed in clay on the south and east side to contain any material from migrating as a liquid. The surface o f l th,e excavation should be sealed with asphalt to minimize the 1 amount of rainwater that penetrates into the soils . The solvent contaminated area on the back of -the property would also be sealed from downgradient Goodhue Street and .the North River by a clay. layer. Groundwater encountered in this area (Test Well #2) is not true groundwater , but interstitial rainwater traveling o.n the subsurface- .ledge. When excavation and tank removal are in process, a portable volatile compound HNU meter will be used to determine which soils are above the 10 ppm limit. In many cases , the action of- exeavation aerates the soils and releases volatiles causing marginal values of 15 to 20 ppm to decrease and pass the criteria. 22 This. . soil, after aeration and. -large concrete or rock .pieces , .can be - returned (af-ter *DEQE review of the analyses) to the hole. .as_-.backfill. If the surface of the excavation is .then sealed by concrete or asphalt, and by clay around the downg.radient perimeter , pump-out .wells may not be required. The quantity of material for disposal will also be reduced by 30 to - 35 percent. If these techniques are allowed by DEQE, and they- .have been used locally before, the following outline of costs .would apply. ESTIMATED P.EM'EDIAL COSTS FOR COMMERCIAL SITE ENCAPSULATION A. #6 fuel oil soil contamination front parking lot disposal of 1100 cy @ $g0/ton $100, 000 . 00 B. Solvent contaminated soil after aeration disposal of 350 cy @ $225/ton. $ 80, 000 . 00 C. Barrel removal 20 @ $350 $ 7, 000. 00 D.. No groundwater recovery wells NC E. Tank removal, cleaning and disposal 20, 00'0 and 6, 000 gall.on tanks $ 20, 000 . 00 F Soil excavation, -engineeri-n-g supervision and chemical. analyses. DEQE permits MCP and final report $ 30, 000. 00 G. Clean backfill material 1200 cy @ $8/cy in place .compacted and resurfaced with asphalt. Clay layer around . perimeter , both areas 160 oy @ $12/yd in-place g 25, 000 .00 Total $262 , 000 . 00 23 r CHAPTER 21-E SITE INVESTIGATION UPDATE CONDUCTED AT: ' FORMER FLYNNTAN SITE 80 BOSTON STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970' PREPARED FOR: MR. JAN EXMAN POWNAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PO BOX 53 .` DORHAM, CONN.ECTICUT 06.422 PREPARED- BY: MR. BRUCE POOLE_ MR. PAUL FINNEGAN SP ENGINEERING., INC.. 45 CONGRESS STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 508-7.45-4569 JANUARY 1996 It of b4 [}AVID BJ9r D) L s a �, BRAti6.EY • T r y Ho.mw ISTfP��Qy ssroNAL E1t6�� r 1J SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY The site is located within th,e Salem Quadrangle of the USGS Topographic Map Series . The . topography of the site is mostly sloping to the southeast according to. the Quadrangle Map with an average elevation of 35 feet above sea level. Run-off flows in two major directions : The front side of the property abutting Boston Street, run-off is 'to the southeast down Boston Street. On the back side of the property, run-off is to the northeast were the North River presently exists . The asphalt/concre.te areas are subdivided into 'three sections ; two of the areas are on the northwest and southeast ends of the property abutting Boston Street with the remaining concrete area abutting Goodhue Street to the northeast. Surrounding the property is commercial/industrial to Hie northeast and southeast, residential to the northwest and southwest. The subsurface soils are believed to be all fill ranging from sand and gravel to rock . The most recent deep hole -monitoring well #2 to 40 feet showed fine silts mixed with sand in the bottom 25 feet. Soils were compact and did not hold much. moisture. The soil is part of the Urban Land-Udorthe.nis Association where soils have been altered or obscured by Urban works and structures or where soil material has been excavated and redeposited . An unknown quantity of brick and concrete footing slabs are present in th-e subsurface due to the remains of an old structure 'which burned many years ago. Subsurface soils were encountered in all asphalt/concrete areas . Priority areas for drilling were near underground petroleum tanks. 4 CURRENT- CONDITIONS The site., which was formerly occupied by Flynntan, . a sheepskin tannery, is now closed. and unoccupied . The ,buildings are showing signs of disrepair . The windows are broken and the roof leaks in places and there was a fire in part of the building. There are still various s i z.ed empty tanks on rthe premises and several underground tanks which must be removed . The buildings are well secured and there was little evidence of unauthorized entry. Two monitoring wells were installed and one test boring advanced using a 4. 2.5 ID Hollow `Stem Auger . During the drilling. for the wells and. the test bore , subsurface soil samples -were taken from the flights and placed immediately in glass jars to minimize the loss of any Volatile Organic Compounds and oxidation . Groundwater samples were taken from the two monitoring wells and the one test boring and analyzed for the bulk metals. Cadmium, Chromium and Lead. A groundwater sample from monitoring well #l, which was installed north of the underground solvent storage tank , was .analyzed for volatile organic compounds. Groundwater from monitoring well #2 was analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons.. .In addition sludge samples from the trenches in the tan area and the color area were taken and analyzed for Cadmium, Chromium and Lead . Liquid samples were taken from the Chrome pit wastewater and the wash pit and analyzed for Conductivity, Chlorides and Chromium. Worst case composite soil samples from the borings at monitoring well #1 and monitoring well f2 were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons,. PCB 's,Volatile Organics and Metals.. Since the contamination is petroleum (fuel) based , the soil and oil can be used to make asphalt . The tests were conducted to make a chemical profile for acceptance to these facilities. An inventory of 55 gallon drums was done . There are twenty nine drums ranging from full to empty . In addition there is a 3 ' x3 ' x3 ' tank containing sheep grease which came from the solvent recovery still. These wastes and chemicals are itemized in the Material Tnvent-c)ry TAhl P nnp AnA Ghnwn in Fi mires Iu 1 ' � 1 .. I TABLE ONE MATERIALS INVENTORY A) . Color Shed Quantity 71,1pe Chemical ..Amount 1 Drum Zep Cleaner 1/2 Full- 1 Drum Leather Preservative 3/4 Full Non-Chlorinated 1 Drum Herbicide Sodium Chlorate 1/4 Full 1 Drum 15% Chromium Solution 3/4 Full 1 3 Drums Empty / 1 Trenches Pit 6" Dried Sludge 3 Cu.Yards B) .' Boiler Room 1 Drum Industrial Kleener Full 1 Drum Detergent 1/2 Full 1 Drum Caustic Soda 1/3 Full 1 Drum # 2 Fuel Oil Full 2 Drums #; 2 Fuel Oil 1/2 Full 5 Drums Empty 1 10,000 Gallon Tank # 6.Fuel Oil 3"-6" 450 gal -900 gal l Mix Pit 1.5 Sludge 5 cy yards Quantity 'r•:pe Chemical Amount C) . Still Area 4 Bags 50 lb Pumice 200 lbs Non-Hazardous 5 Bags 25 lb Diatomaceous Earth 125 lbs Non-Hazardous 4 Drums Empty 1 Tank Sheepgrease from still 200 gal 1 Tank Water 6 grease 200 1 Tank Rain water Only 40 6 Drums Sheepgrease 330 gal D). Tan Room. 1 Pit Degrease Rainwater 1000 gal 1 Pit Chrome Recycle Rainwater 1000 gal 1.5' Sludge 3 cu. yards 1 Trenches .5-1.5' Sludge 1 cu.yard Outside 3 Tanks 275 Fuel Residual 42 55 gal. 1 Tank UG Solvent 3000 gal 6000 gal s trace Stoddards 1 Tank UG Fuel # 6 fuel oil 1500 gal 20,000 gal 6" -3000 2 Tanks Salt Rainwater 3000 gal Lixator Tanks 2' 8 MATERIAL SUMMARY 2 Tanks #6 Fuel Oil 3900 gal 6 Tanks & Drums #2 Fuel OI1 135 gal 1 Task Water & Stoddard 3000 gal 6 Drums Sheepgrease & Stoddard 330 -gal. 3 Tanks Sheepgrease & Stoddard 440 gal. 14 Drums EMPTY Empty 4 Pits & Trenches Tannery Sludge 12 Cu.yards 4 Drums Chemicals Corr or Tox 220 gal 3 Drums non—Hazardous Water 165 gal \ 9 Bags Pumice & DE 325.1b 1 15 Drums Empty u D. ANALYSIS RESULTS Samples of groundwater and subsurface soils from monitoring well #1,. test bore #10 and monitoring well #2 were taken and analyzed for the heavy bulk metals Cadmium , Chromium , Lead , Volatile .Organic Compounds and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons . Analysis of the groundwater from monitoring well #1 resulted in concentrations of Cadmium <0. 01 mg/1 (less than one hundredth, of a milligram per- liter), Chromium, <0 . 05 mg/1 and Lead <0. 01 mg/l . Groundwater from test bore #i0 analysis results were Cadmium <0.. 01 mg/l , Chromium <0. 05 and Lead <0 . 01 mg/l. These results - are below the Reportable Concentration Limits a.s defined by the Massachusetts Oil and .Hazardous Material List for Cadmium 0. 01 mg/l, Chromium 2. 0 mg/l and Lead 0 . 03 m.g/'l for an GW 2 location . Composite soils from monitoring well #1 had .analysis results for Cadmium 0. 974 mg/kg (milligrams per kilogram) , Chromium 832 mg/kg and Lead 13 . 1 mg/kg . Analysis results of the test bore #10 composite soil sample were Cadmium 0. 261 mg/kg, Chromium 18. 5 mg/kg and Lead 6. 19 mg/kg . The Reportable Concentration Limits for an S-2 Location are Cadmium 80 mg/kg , Chromium 2500 mg/kg and Lead 600 mg/kg . Groundwater• from monitoring well #2 . was analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons which produced a concentration of 198 mg/l. The Reportable Concentration is 50 mg/l. A composite soil sample from. monitoring well 12 resulted in analysis concentrations of 0. 385 mg/kg for Cadmium, 13. 7 mg/kg for Chromium and 111 mg/kg for Lead , which are all below the Reportable Concentration Limits . The Volatile organic Analysis of Monitoring Well #1 groundwater showed trace levels of Benzene (24 .ug/1) , Chlorobenzene (12 ug/1) and Ethylbenzene (47 ug/1) . These levels are 1/1.0 the values found in 1.988 and below the zone GW-2 reportable limits of 2000 ug/l for Benzene and 500 ug/1 for Chlorobenzene. The source of the organics as determined. previously , was a leaky tank that contained Stoddard ' s solvent (mineral spirits) , a petroleum distillate mixture . A worst case soil .sample from monitoring well 12 was analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons . The concentration found was 101,000 mg/kg . The Reportable Concentration Limit for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons is 2500 mg/kg . The worst .case soil sample from monitoring- well #1 when analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons produced a concentration of 2920 mg/kg . Remediationn -of the oily soils surrounding the fuel. tanks would be done as part of the tank removal and demolition effort and as such would regUir•e permits from the Fire Department and a DEP Bill of Lading . Sludge samples were taken from a trench in the tan .room and a trench in the color room. Analysis results are Tan Room; Cadmium 3 . 28 mg/kg , Chromium 6966 mg/kg and Lead 49 mg/kg ; Color Room, Cadmium 1. 80 mg/kg , Chromium 54 . 1 mg/kg and Lead 849 mg/kg . Because of the Chromium and Lead concentrations in both rooms, the sludge requires removal . The concentration in the color room is above the Lead" limit of 600 mg/kg which requires -the removal of the sludge . Analysis of liquid samples from the wastewater Chrome Pit and the wastewater wash pit produced concentrations of 4453 mg/l of Chlorides , 0. 393 mg/1 of Chromium and a .Conductivity reading of 7980 umhos in the chrome pit and 3755 mg/l Chlorides , 0. 057 mg/l Chromium and a Conductivity reading of 7520 umhos in the wash pit. These waters are from rain collection and not subject to treatment or removal . 12 TABLE TWO CONTAMINATED SOIL ANALYSIS PROFILE Worst Case Worst Case Monitoring Monitoring Acceptance Well #1 Well #2 Limits Total Solids $ 86 80 >60% Bulk Metals Dry Weight Arsenic mg/kg 28. 8 10. 6 30 Cadmium mg/kg . 974 .385 30 Chr-omium mg/kg 832 13 . 7 500 Lead mg/kg 13 . 1 111 1000 Mercury mg/kg . 091 . 026 10 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg/kg 2920 101, 000 60, 000 Method 8100 PCB & Pesticides <0. 02 <0 . 8 2. 0 mg/kg . Method 8080 Volatile Organics 1. 75 <0. 5 30 Total mg/kg 5 Chlorinated Method 8240 HNu Reading PPM 225 38 100 13 The previous 1988 site investigation advanced 8 test bores on all sides of the property . (See Figure 2B ) . Since the area is underlain with ledge , groundwater was only encountered on the Goodhue Street side. The subsurface soils were tested for metals , petroleum and volatile organics. Petroleum was found In two areas as identified on Figure 2A and chromium was found in monitoring well #1 soils. The levels of stoddard solvent in the groundwater (as indicated by toluene and xylene levels) has decreased tenfold since 1988 . This update focused on determining the extent of contaminatant .migration for the purpose of remediation . ' Fresh samples- of contaminated soils were characterized for acceptance to an asphalt plant or . landfills . The results are summarized in Table Two and the original lab reports can be found in the appendix. SITE RESEARCH The files of the Salem Fire Department revealed the following information on permitted tanks: (1) 20 , 000 gallon #6 fuel .oil underground tank located in the northwest parking lot abutting Boston Street. (2) 275 - gallon 12 fuel oil aboveground tanks located within the shipping room on the northwest corner of the building. (3) 275 - gallon #3 fuel oil aboveground tanks located within the maintenance shop abutting Goodhue Street to the east. (1 ) ' 6, 000 gallon solvent underground tank located between the the maintenance shop and the boiler room within the driveway area. (1) 10, 000 gallon abandoned # 6 fuel oil underground tank located in the boiler room abutting Goodhue Street. 22 A review of the Department of Environmental Protection Files revealed that at 2 Goodhue Street, on the corner of Goodhue and Bridge, a release was reported in . April 1987 , Case #3-042.7.' The lot is utilized as a parking lot and owned by James Weener of JHW Corporation. The source of . contamination is believed to be from P. .. . Claiman, who ' has a 55 year old 10,000-gallon concrete underground tank. According to Jim Weener , the tank was pumped and cleaned this summer . A site assessment was conducted by Target Envi.ronmental Service in April 1987 showing hig-h fuel oil , diesel or kerosene in concentrations up to. 21 ppm. . The case is presently pending . Located at 12 Hanson Street, and not recorded in DEQE Incident Files , just -northwest from John Flynn & Sons, SP, Inc. conducted a site investigation for Beverly Leather Corporation in March 1987. The site investigation discovered high lead at -greater- than 5 mg/l, oil -and grease at 17. 5 percent and total volatile organics of 3920 ppb within Test Hole #2. The source of contamination is believed to be a product of the finishing preparation of the past operation. Remedial action was conducted on April 22, 1988 by SP, Inc. SP, Inc. . supervised the removal of 120-. 16 tons of contaminated soil . The soil was transported by. Total Waste Management Corporation, Newington , New Hampshire (US EPA ID #NHD980521843) to Sawyer Environmental Recovery of Hampden, Maine. 23 CONCLUSIONS .The . updated site investigation on December 11, 1995 confirms the presence of contamination surrounding the underground 20,000 gallon fuel oil tank on Boston Street and contamination in the soil around the underground solvent storage tank on Goodhue Street. Fortunately, the compounds detected were strictly petroleum in origin and suitable for recycling . 'Chlorinated solvents, Arsenic , Mercury or PCB 's were. not detected in worst case samples. The volatile or levels 'are low and consists primairly of xylene . The petroleum compound. that migrated the furthest in. the front area appears to be a. lighter grade. of oil than. #6 , and is detectable with a photoionizer . It is likely that the heavy oil was blended at times with Kerosene (#2) for better burning . and start-up and this material was able to migrate . The test ,-boring TB-2 revealed that previously suspected contamination, in the soil adjacent to the abandoned underground 10 ,000 gallon fuel oil tank in the old boiler room , is not present .' As expected , the dried sludge in the tan room and the color room trenches exceeds Reportable Concentration Limits and will have to be removed . The underground fuel oil tanks and the solvent tanks must also be removed or filled. Any contaminated soils must be removed before the site can be certified free of contamination. 24 Arrangements with a waste hauler , such as General Chemicals must be made for the disposal of tank contents , sludges ,, grease and the 29 drums. The presence of the lixator ,' which is a large concrete tank adjacent to .the 20,000 gallon underground fuel tank and used to make brine for the tannery. processing , reduced the amount of soil which would have been contaminated by any oil leaking from the underground oil storage tank by blocking lateral flow. These tanks can be filled with clean material . The Scope of tank removal and contaminated soil removal are outlined below . SP Engineering regularly performs this type of remediation work and will provide cost - estimates if desired . RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations for remediation are dependent upon - the future J utilization options. If the new , building section and foundations are kept, the. .indoor 10, 000 fuel tank could be cleaned in place and filled with slurry concrete. Otherwise ,- the tank would be excavated during demolition of the footings . It should be noted that the boiler room and the new tan room were constructed with thick 12-18" - walls and heavy (#6) reinforcing steel. The process pits and wastewater trenches need to be drained of accumulated rainwater and dried before manual removal of the residual sludge. A 20 yard dumpster would : be rented for . the sludge and miscellaneous wastes . Although the pits were all drained on closure , a small amount of sludge remains in the bottom 6-18" . These pits can then be filled and compacted with clean gravel and a minimum 6" concrete cap doweled into sidewalls every 6" (#6 . R bar) . There are six pits to be cleaned and filled , including two outside . In another phase of remediation, usually performed concurrently the remaining fiberglass tanks and still would be drained into drums and dismantled . It is often necessary to steam clean the steel piping before recycling as scrap. The water/residue - is also. consolidated in drums . The drums throughout the lower floor would be brought to the loading dock , consolidated where possible and labeled .- A di-sposal . firm such as General Chemical would be contracted to pick-up, manifest and properly dispose of the drums . The- tank removals are required under the State 1987 revisions to the -State Fire Code , which requires all tanks greater than 15 years old or abandoned to be removed and disposed of at an approved scrap yard . At the same time any contaminated soil has to be removed . At the Flynn Tan site the first step would be removal of contents . Since 16 fuel oil is very thick it will take days of steam heating to .get it fluid enough for pumping . Then it will bulk transferred to to a waste oil carrier. such as Murphy's . The tanks would then be excavated and placed on the adjacent pavement . The end of the tank would- be cut open for access. . The interior would be scraped with a squigee and wiped clean before transport to a scrapyard . In both remediation areas there is a layer of uncontaminated soil 3-11 ' deep over the zone of petroleum contamination. This soil would be stripped off and stored on -the pavement upgradient of the excavation. The removal of contaminated soil would then commence with limited stockpiling above grade. Clean sand and fill will be brought to the site and stockpiled .for backfilling and use as dikes around contaminated material. Soil left above grade for any period of time must be covered. Applications for acceptance of both soils have been submitted to Bardon Trimount whose recycling facility is located in Salem, MA, approximately four miles from the site . 26 It is suggested that the smaller area next to Goodhue Street be excavated first. It is estimated that 415 cubic yards " of material will be removed from area one and 778• cubic yards of soil from area two As part of the demolition effort the asbestos siding would be removed and held separately in dumpsters for. separate disposal. LIMITATIONS The Environmental Site Assessment conducted for this property consisted of a site visit, analysis of groundwater and surface soils , --review of the history of the site with municipal and state officials and a scan of the entire buildings and foundation with an EiNu - photoionizer . The conclusions were' based on these observations. Should additional quantitative chemical laboratory analyses of the soils become available in the future, these data should be reviewed by SP Engineering and the conclusions presented herein may be modified . The report has been prepared on behalf of and for the -exclusive use of Mr . Jan Exman, solely for. use as an environmental evaluation of the site . The report and findings contained herein shall not in whole- or in part be disseminated or conveyed to any other party except as authorized by- Mr. Jan Exman. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made . 27 We hope the information contained herein is adequate for your - needs . If you have. any questions or comments , we will be pleased to respond.. Thank. you for the opportunity to work with you. very truly yours SP ENGINEERING, INC Paul D. Finnegan Bruce M: Poole Environmental Specialist President PDF/pfs APPENDIX LOCATION OEPT14 (Feet) MW-I Soil description MW- Soil Description Tan gravel 2 some odor - B=1 ack odorous gravel 4 l Black silty sand. 6 odor of kerosene Water 8 10 f2 14 Bottom of Well 16 18 20 Silica Sand Bentonite Seal Natural BackfilI Concrete -WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAMS Property at : 80 BOSTON STREET SALEM, MA �ci %,mmirn ►i.% DEPTH LOCATION (Feet) MW-2 Soil Description MW- Soil Description 0' ) Medium tan gravel Brown tan grovel 1 - . 5 Medium tan gravel 10 Medium tan gravelly fill some slight odor 15 Dark brown gravel oil odor 20 Brown black grovel 25 oily odor II kerosene) - t Dark brown black grave I 30 oily odor 35 40 Bottom of well D Silica Sand Bentonite-Seai Natural BackfilI Concrete WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAMS Property at: 80 BOSTON STREET SALEM, MA rl vwes'l-rw ski 1 -DEPTH LOCATION (Feet) T B - 2 0 Light gray gravel 2 . Dark-gray to black fine 4 sand / silt g Water Wet black coarse-sand oily odor 8 10 Bottom- of Boring. 12 14 IC SOIL LOGS Property at- 80 BOSTON STREET SALEM,MA (FLYNNTAN ) TAN fc ImFOR M.4 7-1a v a czymv E'SONS AT 80 0JS 1 b oV,5T.t;EzET S�fLEi M,'1 b6�{,Gi/l/S�TTS d.4G,EN/ F/R.t: .DEPARTM.EivT ) POIVER BURNEBS Nana goer_� POWili BTR.YERS Address Date Ju17 25.1979 80 9n=ton street Date Name John F17nn _• Sons riil_r a toss-- Name of Burner Kind of Heat Location 80 Boston St No.of.Tanks 2 Gals ?srldsrB Lot 80 Boston -` Name of Burner-Clever-Broo'rs Mass.Approval No. • 789 Stored Cap.of Tank Cals. Location of Tank Iliad of Oil Gals.Stored 30,000 Kind.of Heat Steam Location of Tank Under round Kind of Oil IL-6 Installed by ?or— 54of --'- Installed b ected 7 -j0 - ~:•• -z_c y Ja ,r C.of C.# !:vt, p Approved 7 'J .. Inspected by3.Dansreau Date Approved 7-25-79 POSER BULL ERS Power Burners � roe-_- Date Ja ary 12,1c82 Date Deeeaber 29.1977 Name Je'.•_: -17nn k Sort !no. i Name :cation . O 3e=ton St No. of Tanks 2 ! Location 19 Goodhue St No.of Tanks 3 Nanre of Burner Su^-?+•r Most. Approval No. c:o Name of Burner Williamson 3I25s.Approval No. •qf�q Gals. Stared 607 Kind of Heat Steam Gals.Stored 825 rind of Heat Q Location of Tank ? -me Stora_e 'Roo--Kind of Oil '� - I Location of Tank Garace an Goodhue Kind of Oil #2 installed by ;=as Kakoras C. of C. = 862-1 Installed by Ste-,ten r, s r C.of C.# on I Inspected by R.:ansreau Date Approved J1',7-°2 Inspected by D.C.Soarovski Date Approved 12-29-77 Name Address CO B03ton St Date Name of Burner Kind of Heat Gats_Stored t +V) Cap.of Tank •^ n�Gals. Locatio.q of Tank 19 Goodhue St Kind of Oil 6 lostalted by - u '"*�* ,::-n ■� _ten Tnr. 8 A:�ir. 5t. - -�c,=.. . u � 1 Li ENGINEERING INC. P.O. Box 438 • Salem, tus,achusetts 01970 Telephone: (978) 745 4569 • Fax: 1978) 1 45 4881 November 17, 1997 %•lr. Jan Exman Pownal'De%,elopment Corporation P.O. Box �3 - Durham. CT 06422 Re: Flynn Tan 21 E. Update-& Rrmediation Estimates Dear Mr. Exman, We [lave competed the ! E Site 1nvesti�atien 1'pdate on the former Flynn Tan Property located at 80 Boston Street. Salem. ti[A and prepared this report. The study confirmed and defined our previous conclusions on the release of fuel in the front and rear areas. The present site conditions have been. documented and remediation needs 'Listed in the report conclusions. The solvent levels in the back area monitorinv Weil =], have decreased tenfold since the 1989 study and are below reportable limits in most cases. The soils were previousiv characterized for acceptance at an asphalt recycling facility_ Separate froth the report we have itemized remediation cost estimates and time required for implementation. We would suggest the Phases A to F be undertaken in order over a step wise program. The chemical and fuel drum removal and inside solvent still closure are items that must be completed before demolition 'and reconstruction can be started_ Once authorized these two items would take approximately-one month. If all work phases were conducted in sequence the project could be completed in--6 months. This is considering that demolition has to occur before certain tanks can be removed. Because of the amount of monev necessary to clean-up the site and make it usable, the city will often off set the unpaid property taxes. It is anticipated that the city will require the filling of a DEP RAM Plan and an associated RAO statement to be re-classified or removed from the LTB 1 list. Please call if.vou have any questions on this report or remediation cost estimates. additional Work would be billed on a monthly basis as incurred. Very truiv yours SP Engineerin2, Inc. Bruce M. Poole President BIV1P/sm Mr.Jan E vman N&vember 17.1997 Pad 2 \ Remediation Estimates Flynn Tan 80 Boston Street Salem, MA A. Fuel & Chemical Disposal 29Drums, #6 Oil, Sheep. grease and Stoddard Material Summary Tanks TF F;1o1 Oil 'n S �.00gallon @ 1._0' S 5850.00 6 Drums �: Fuel Oil 135 gallon- 1.50g 202.00 1 Tank eater & Stoddard 3000 gallon @ 1.80g 5400`00 6 Drums Sheepgrease & Stoddard 330 gallon 3 Tanks Sheepgrease& Stoddard 440 gallon 14 Drums From Above (SS) 14 @a 495.00 6930-06 4 Drums Chemicals Corr or Tox 4 (a)395.00 1580.00 3 Drums von-Hazardous 3 cni 120.00 360.00- 9 Bags Pumice & DE 9 50.00 450.00 15 Drums Empty 15 1fl.00 150.00 =9 New Drums H16 �9 na 35.00 1,015:00 Disposal Costs S 21937.00 Labor to consolidate wastes and label drums, heath oil and run pumps. 2 men x 30 hours @ S50/hr 3000.00 Engineering for manifests; Permits 20 hours ,@ S70/hr 1400.00 Subtotal S 26337.00 Mr.Jan E.xm= Nmember 17. 1997 Page 3 B. Removal of the Wastewater Sludge and Pit clossure,T►nair float• Drain off water 8 manhours .2a S501hr $ 400.00 Backhoe& Shovel up sludge Load dumpster. Crew -" days @ $1500/d 3000.00 Sludge Transport & Disposal 20 cy 'iv S 180icy 3600.00 Fill for Pits - lixator 24'Y24'10' = 213 cv 2560.00 Mix& color Pit'76 cy 912.00 Chrome& Degrease Pit 64 cy M&O-0. Dowel, lay steel & pour concrete 40 cy .ti S200 8000.00 Placement of fill - front end loader, Crew 1 days w $1500/d 3000.00 Subtotal $-22240,00 .C. Removal of.6000 unHon Solvent Tank Excavate tank Crew and Equipment = days z) S 1-500.'d 3000.00 Cut open and clean tank 2 men hours S Zoihr 400.00 Wipes, suits, tank disposal of sludge..etc. 3 drums Z 5325/drum 975.00 Transport tank to rank yard 2 hours w $100/hr v 200.00 Clean fill 3b cubic yards @ S12/yard 432.00 Engineer Supervise& coordinate 16 hours cr; S70/hr 11120.00 Subtotal `$ 6127.00 D. Soil Removal Area. 1 Solvent Tank Supervise& HNu & Sample 16 hours Z. S70/hr 1120.00 Reinstall wells(2) @ $600 1200.00 -Excavation of soil 3 days @ 1500/d 1500.00 Disposal of Contaminated soil 200 cy @ $225 45,000.00 Clean Fill 200 cy @. $12/yard 2400.00 Backfill & compact & pave area 2800-0.0 Subtotal $-54020.00 E. Remove 203000 gallon Tank Excavate tank&jackhammer bunker 3 days :, $1500/d 4500.00 Cut and clean tank 2 men. 16 hours iu S50ihr 1600.00 Sludge, wipes, suits,etc. 10 drums &.$250/drum 2500.00 Transport tank to tank yard 6 hours ;c'�r. $100/hr" .660.00 Permits 100.00 Fill 120 yards @ $12/yard -- --_-- _-- 1440.00 Engineer Supervise and coordinate 24 hours nn. $70/hr 1'680,00 Subtotal $ 12420.00 \Ir_Ian Evnan November 17. 1997 Page a 1 F. Soil Rem ova area. F ipl T' nk Excavating truck &Crew 10 days u S 1500/d 15000.00 Engineer Supervision & sampling 80 hours 2 S70;hr 5600.00 Chemical Analvsis- Soil & Water 1500.00 Oil logs around piles & tarps 1800.00 Transport & Disposal 1011 tons 1'tb S601ton 60660.00 Plastic for covering soil piles y 500.00 Groundwater pumping during excavation 00iday. 2000.00 Oil & Water disposal 5500 gallon - S95igallon 5225.00 Clean fill 778 cy @ S 12fcy 9336.00 Subtotal S 101621.00 A. Fuel & Chemical Disposal r $26,337.00 B. Sludge.Removal & Pit Closure $22,240.%,. C. Remove 6,000 gallon Solvent tank $6,127.00 D. Soil Removal :area 1, 200 ton $594020.00 E. Remove 210,000:gallon Fuel Tank & Bunker $129420.00 F. Soil Removal Area 2 1011 Ton $101,621.00 Total Costs $222,765.00 COPY Flynntan Site Salem,Massachusetts Location and Characteristics The Flynntan Site is a former leather tanning factory that is located in a heavily populated residential/commercial area of Salem,Massachusetts. A large wood/brick building is located within the Site which encompasses two buildings. One portion is a 4-story wood/metal frame building and was used for the leather tanning operations (building-a). Its interior has sustained 2 fires. The rest of the structure is made up of a newer 2-story, brick sided building that is in better structural condition(building-b). Building-a is not occupied, however, building-b on the day of the PA/Sl was illegally occupied by two tenants(a construction company and a storage/shipping business). Most of the windows and doors of the entire structure are either broken, missing or have been replaced by temporary plywood. PA/SI Findings The PA/SI revealed that.the primary threats are inside building-a. They consist of ignitable and caustic substances in drums as well as metal tanning residues/dust such as chromium detected on the floors, in the drains and settling pits. High levels of lead were detected in a vat and PCBs were detected on the floors under several leaking electrical components. The PAM also revealed high levels of lead contamination in an area on the exterior grounds of the Site. During the day of the PA/SI the City's Fire and Building Departments visited and inspected.the Site. After their inspection the Building Department determined that the entire.structure, structurally unsound and condemned it by posting signs on every entrance to the Site. Human and Environmental Threats There is clear evidence from graffiti and other vandalism activities that children and others are entering the Site. The area around the Site is heavily populated both residentially and commercially. The closest residential property is less than 100 feet away from,the Site. An estimated 1,000 people reside/work .25 miles of the Site. A day care facility is located .2 miles west of the Site. Within a 1-mile radius there are 5 other schools, one of which is Salem High School. The primary human receptors of concern are children who may enter the Site, and come into contact with the contaminants, and others who work and/or engage in recreational activities on the adjacent properties. The Site is situated north of and less than .5 miles from the North River Canal which flows into the Salem Sound. If the Site catches fire and is put out by the.Fire Department, the water used, will get contaminated from the contaminants present in building-a. The runoff water will most likely travel into the canal. Potential receptors of the contaminants may include fish and other organisms such as shell fish dependent upon the North River Canal and Salem Sound. Portions of the river and sound are used for recreational activities such as swimming and recreational fishing. r FLYNNTAN \ SUPERFUND SITE J This enforcement strategy is preliminary given the early stage of case development and the need to proceed with the removal action. As the case develops, members of the Case Team (namely the Case Attorney and the Enforcement Coordinator)will continually assess new information and revise the enforcement strategy accordingly. PURPOSE This document sets forth information gathered to date and constitutes a preliminary plan for conducting enforcement-related activities with respect to the FLYNNTAN Superfund Site. BACKGROUND The Flynntan Site is located at 70-92 Boston Street in Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. The Site is the location of a former leather tanning operation, consisting of two large joined buildings. The four story wood/metal frame building was used for leather operations. The exteriof asbestos shingles are falling way, and the building has had two fires. The second attached structure is a newer two story building consists of brick siding, and is in better condition than the four.story structure. The four story building is not occupied; however, the two story building has been occupied by two tenants, a construction company and a storage/shipping business. Most of the windows are broken, missing or are temporarily covered with ply-wood. There are three parking areas adjacent to the structures. There are approximately 21 55-gallon drums located inside the building. Most were located on the first floor of the four story structure. Labels include flammables, corrosives, formic acid, degreasing solvent, chrome complex in isopranol, SYN FOG.insecticide, and sodium acetate. The first floor and its drains are littered with powders and tanning process residues. There is an approximately 10'x15' settling pit that is filled with 5' of liquids and about 1' of sludge. The rest of the floors are littered with boxes, paper, and trash from vandalism. The area surrounding the Site is paved expect for a small area adjacent to the south portion of the four story building. This area.showed signs of stressed vegetation, soil discoloration and contained decomposing leather hides. At the request of the City of Salem, EPA conducted a preliminary assessment and site investigation on April 14 and 16, 1998. Results of the investigation revealed the existence of flammable substances and caustic substances. The floors and settling pits were found to contain chromium and polychlorinated_biphenyls (PCBs). ENFORCEMENT HISTORY The Site is owned by Salem Realty, LLC. The City of Salem has tried for at least two years to ) get the property owner to conduct removal actions at the Site, without success,after which the City requested EPA assistance in investigating conditions at the Site. EPA requested access to the property on December 4, 1997 from the property owner: The property owner refused access to the Site, and on March 26, 1998; EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order for Access to the property owner. The property owner subsequently received a signed access agreement to conduct the preliminary assessment/site investigation. ENFORCEMENT STRATEGY EPA sent a Notice Letter and Request for Access to the property owner on May 4, T998. Early information indicates the property owner will not cooperate in either financing or conducting removal actions at the Site. Based on Site conditions, and the concerns that a fire could occur at the Site,the Agency will commence a fund-lead removal action, and pursue cost recovery for EPA costs incurred. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF ENFORCEMENT STRATEGY As noted above,this enforcement strategy is necessarily preliminary, However, as additional information regarding Site delineation and regarding PRPs becomes available,EPA will revise and develop this enforcement strategy. Questions regarding matters discussed herein may be directed to Sharon Fennelly, Enforcement Coordinator, (617) 223-5541. U.S . ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY POLLUTION REPORT ) I _ HEADING DATE: OCTOBER 27, 1998 SUBJECT: FLYNNTAN SITE - POLREP #3 FINAL LOCATION: 70-92 BOSTON STREET, SALEM, MA SITE ID NUMBER: 015Y CERCLIS NUMBER: MA0002333433 OSC: A. HATZOPOULOS, USEPA, OFFICE OF SITE REMEDIATION AND RESTORATION, SECT. II OFFICE PHONE #: 617-918-1284 (OFFICE) ACTION MEMO STATUS : FUND LEAD INCEPTION DATE: JULY 6, 1998 DEMOBILIZATION DATE: OCTOBER 27, 1998 II . BACKGROUND The Site is located at 70-92 Boston Street in Salem, Massachusetts. The Site is approximately 1. 90 acres and is an abandoned leather tanning factory located in a heavily populated residential/commercial area of Salem, Massachusetts . Contaminants found at the site include but are not limited to heavy metals and polychlorinated :biphenyls . For- further background information, please refer to POLREP No. 1. III . ACTIONS (August 14, 1998 through October 27, 1998) For details of actions completed prior to August 14, 1998, please refer to POLREP Nos . 1 and 2 . See Table 1 for the amount of materials. collected and transported offsite, destination and/or the disposal technology. 1) 8/14/98 completed the collection and transported the hazardous waste liquids from floor trenches and pits to United Oil Recovery, Meriden, CT; 2) 8/20/98 completed the transportation and disposal of drums to Cycle Chem, Elizabeth, NJ; 3) 9/10/98 completed the disposal of the sludge from pits, tannery solids from floors and trenches, along with a limited amount of lead and chromium contaminated surface soil to Waste Management, Norridgewock, ME; 4) 9/21/98 completed the covering of 'the floor trenches and pits with plywood and metal plates; 5.) 9/30/98 completed. the disposal and transportation of contaminated personal protective equipment and hose to Waste Management, Norridgewock, ME. 6) 10/27/98 completed the disposal and transportation of leather scraps to Cycle Chem, Inc. , Elizabeth, NJ. 2 TABLE 1 WASTE STREAM AMOUNT DESIGNATED TREATMENT AND/OR FACILITY DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY HAZARDOUS 5,375 UNITED OIL ULTRA FILTRATION, WASTE gallons RECOVERY, MERIDEN, CARBON FILTRATION, LIQUIDS CT REVERSE OSMOSIS DISCHARGED, POTW NON 2, 943 ECC, ULTRA FILTRATION REGULATED gallons STOUGHTON, MA DISCHARGED TO MWRA LIQUIDS NON RCRA 65 CYCLE CHEM, TO BE DETERMINED .WASTE gallons ELIZABETH, NJ (TBD) FLAMMABLE 1, 055 CYCLE CHEM, TBD LIQUIDS gallons ELIZABETH, NJ CORROSIVE 430 CYCLE .CHEM, TBD LIQUIDS. gallons ELIZABETH, NJ CHEMICAL 1, 700 CYCLE CHEM, TBD PROCESS lbs ELIZABETH, NJ LIQUIDS CHEMICAL 660 CYCLE CHEM, TBD PROCESS gallons ELIZABETH, NJ SOLIDS LEATHER 2 CYCLE CHEM, TBD SCRAPS cubic ELIZABETH,NJ yards LEAD/ACID 160 lbs STATELINE SCRAP, RECYCLE BATTERIES SOUTH ATTLEBORO, MA CHROMIUM/PAH 8, 080 WASTE MANAGEMENT, LANDFILL COVER CONTAMINATED gallons NORRIDGEWOCK, ME TANNING SLUDGE . 3 l IV. FINANCIAL The removal project ceiling defined in the Action Memorandum is $286, 000 .00 CEILING CHARGED BALANCE ERCS $130, 000 $130, 000 $ -0- EPA $ 70, 000 $55, 000 $15,000 START $ 50, 000 $20, 000 $30,000 CONTINGENCY $ 36, 000 $ -0- $36, 000 TOTAL $286, 000 $205, 000 $81, 000 The above- cost- estimate is based.on figures known to the OSC at the time this POLREP was written. The - cost accounting does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery. V. FUTURE PLANS A small portion of chromium contaminated soil (approximately 60 cubic feet) which is located between the parking lot and adjacent to. the southwest' portion of the four story metal/wood frame building, will remain on Site. This area is located in an approximately 15-foot depression from the parking lot and is not easily accessible to the public. It does not meet the EPA time critical removal criteria because it does not pose a direct contact threat and does not appear to have the capability to migrate via wind or surface run off. The OSC has discussed this matter with both, the MADEP and the City of Salem and has advised them to take this matter into consideration on any future activities at the Site CASE PENDS F _Ja��ED STgT�S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 1 W i C�� W, 4 JOHN F. KENNEDY FEDERAL BUILDING BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02203-0001 FYp��✓dRO�GS '�; Enforcement Confidential Materials Attached MEMORANDUM DATE: May 26, 1998 SUBJECT: Request for a Removal Action at the Flynntan Site, Salem,- Massachusetts - ACTION MEMORANDUM FROM: Athanasios Hatzopoulos, On-Scene Coordinator Site Evaluation and s e Section II THRU: Steven R. Novick, Chie Site Evaluation and Response II TO-: Patricia L. Meaney, Director Office of Site Remediation and Restoration I. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Action Memorandum is to request and document approval of the proposed removal action at the .Flynntan Site (the Site) , which is located at 70-92 Boston Street in Salem, Essex. County, Massachusetts . Hazardous substances present in drums and on the floors of the manufacturing building, if not addressed by implementing the response actions selected in this Action Memorandum, will continue to pose a threat to human health and the environment . There are no nationally significant or precedent-setting issues associated with this Site, and there has been no use of the OSC' s $50, 000 warrant authority. II. SITE 0ONDITIONS AND BACKGROUND CERCLIS Identifier: MA0002333433 SITE Identifier:015Y Category of Removal : Time-Critical Intemet Address(URL)• http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable•Printed with Vegetable Of Based Inks on Recycled Paper(Minimum 25%Posiconsumer) A. Site Description 1. Removal Site Evaluation In November of 1997, the City of Salem, Planning Department (the City) . referred this Site to the Emergency Planning and Response Branch (EPRB) . The CityyIs concern 'was -that hazardous wastes may have. existed on-Site. Since 1996 the City had repeatedly informed the owner that the City' s primary goal is to see the Site environmentally cleaned up and returned to productive use. Furthermore, the City was concerned that portions of the Site were rented illegally to tenants and other portions of the building were used by children as a clubhouse. On December 4, 1997-, EPA sent a request for access to the property owner for the purposes of conducting a Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation (PA/SI) . . The owner refused EPA access. Consequently, on March 26, 1998, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to ' the property owner, after which access was granted. On April, .14 & 16, 1998, the Emergency 'Planning and Response Branch (EPRB) conducted a PA/S.I which included sampling of drums, soils, liquid samples from pits, \ interior floors and drains of .the manufacturing building. Based on this investigation, EPA documented that several of the drums are flammable and several other .drums conta-in caustic substances. Sampling. analysis also revealed that the floors and settling pits from the structure on the Site are contaminated with. chromium as well polychlorinated biphe'nyls (PCBs) . In addition, lead contaminated soil was detected under a pile of animal -hides .on the exterior grounds of the ------_----- concluded, and a removal action was recommended in the closure memorandum dated April 28, 1998, to remove the contaminated substances. The results of the PA/SI are documented in the report entitled Removal Pro ram Preliminary Assessment Site Investigation for the Flynntan Site _Salem, 'Massachusetts, dated May, 1998 . 2 . Phys7kcal-Location. — ------ ------ -- The Site is located at 70-92 Boston Street in Salem, Essex county, Massachusetts . The Site is further defined in Book 137.51., Page 323 , Essex County Registry of Deeds, Salem, Massachusetts . - The approximate 2 N latitude and longitude of" the Site are 4203111211N. and 7005413811W. The Site is bordered to the north by Goodhue and Beaver' Streets; to the south by Boston Street; to the west by a- residential/commercial area; and to the east by the intersection of Boston Street and Goodhue Street . Private residences are located within 100 feet of the Site boundaries. Land use in the immediate vicinity is mixed residential/commercial. The Site is situated less than half of a mile from the North '.River Canal which flows into the Salem Sound. 3 . Site Characteristics The Site is approximately 1 . 9 acres and it is fenced. However, evidence of graffiti and other vandalism activities clearly indicates that trespassing is a common occurrence . A large wood/brick structure and several parking areas are located within the Site . This structure is made up of two buildings which are joined. One portion is a 4-story wood/metal frame building and was used for the leather tanning operations (building-a) . The buildings exterior is covered. by asbestos shingles that are falling off. The interior has sustained 2 fires . The rest of the structure is made up of a newer 2-story, brick sided building that is in better structural condition . . (building-b) . Building-a is not occupied. However, building-b on the day of the PA/SI, was illegally occupied by two tenants (a construction company and a storage/shipping business) . Most of the windows and doors of the. entire structure are either broken, missing. or have been replaced by temporary plywood. The Site has three parking areas that are adjacent . to the structure. Historical information indicates that the Site contains 4-6 underground storage tanks possibly containing heating oil. The.PA/SI revealed that approximately 21, 55-gallon drums are located inside the Site ' s structure. Most were on the first floor of building-a, and had various labels such as-: flammable, corrosive, formic acid, degreasing solvent, chrome complex in isopranol, SYN FOG insecticide, and sodium acetate. The first floor and its drains are littered with powders and tanning process residues . There is an approximately 101x15' settling pit that is filled with 5 ' of liquid and about 1 ' of sludge. The rest .of the floors are littered with boxes, paper, and trash from vandalism and other trespassing activities . Building-b contains another pit that is filled with liquid and sludge like material . 3 The exterior grounds of the Site 'are paved except for j one small area that is adjacent to south portion of building-a. This area showed signs of stressed vegetation, soil discoloration and also had a pile of decomposing animal hides . During .the day of the PA/SI the City's Fire and Building Departments visited and inspected the Site . After their inspection the Building Department -determined the entire structure unsound for habitation and condemned - it by posting signs on every entrance to the Site. 4 . Release or Threatened Release into the Environment of a Hazardous Substance or Pollutant or Contaminant The following hazardous substances as defined in CFR -261 .2 and 302 .4 as seen in Table 1 were detected in samples collected during the PA/SI conducted at the Site . The concentrations listed are matched to the EPA list of hazardous substances and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection' s (MADEP) Soil category standards . They are the highest ones reported for that particular waste stream. TABLE 1 ) MEDIA HAZARDOUS CONCENTRATION MADEP SOIL EPA SUBSTANCE IN DRY WEIGHT CATEGORY CFR ppm STANDARDS ppm sludge from, lead 2,630 300-600 vats residues/ chromium 23,000 1,000-5,000 dirt on floors & arsenic 26.1 30 drains drams ignitables 190 <60°C corrosive >13 pH z 12.5 soil lead 1,450 300-600 4 5 . NPL Status The Site is currently not listed on the National Priorities List._ The Site is not, at this time, being evaluated by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . B. Other Actions to Date 1. Previous Actions From 1996, the City of Salem has been in contact with the owner regarding the cleaning and possible redevelopment of the Site. In October 1997, the City's Building Department, due to a complaint received by the Salem neighborhood Improvement Task Force, had conducted a building inspection of the Site. The City on October 15, 1997, notified .the owner of illegal rental of the property. 2 . Current Actions This will be EPAs first removal action conducted at the Site. C. State and Local Authorities' Roles The City of Salem has assisted- EPA in collecting background information. The MADEP has been contacted by EPA and is expected to assist EPA by providing . technical comments on the proposed removal action and generating a list of regulations for consideration as applicable or relevant and appropriate. - Neither state nor local authorities have the resources to remove the hazardous substances abandoned at the Site. III. THREATS TO. PUBLIC HEALTH OR WELFARE OR THE ENVIRONMENT, AND STATUTORY AND- REGULATORY AUTHORITIES A. Threats to .Public Health or Welfare There is clear evidence from graffiti and other vandalism activities that children and others are entering the Site.. The area around- the Site is heavily populated both residentially and commercially. The closest residential property is less than 100 feet away from the Site. An estimated 1, 000 people reside/work .25 miles of the Site. A 5 day care facility is located .2 miles west of the Site. 1 Within a 1-mile radius there are 5 other schools, one of / which is Salem High School . The primary human receptors of concern are children who may enter the Site, and come into contact with the contaminants, and others who work and/or engage in- recreational activities on the adjacent properties. Based on Site conditions and information available on the . hazardous substances present, the Site poses the following threats to public health or .welfare. 40 CFR 300 .415 (b) (2) (i) Actual or potential exposure to nearby human populations, animals, or the food chain from .hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants Chromium, PCB and lead contamination on the floors and settling pits of building-a, pose a direct contact threat to individuals who may enter the Site. These. constituents may also escape to the exterior by means of open pathways. Corrosive and ignitable substances in building-a pose a direct contact threat to children or trespassers entering the Site 40 CFR 300-.415 (b) (2) (iii) Hazardous substances or pollutants .or .contaminants in drums, barrels, tanks, or other bulk storage containers, that may pose a threat of release Ignitable and corrosive substances in drums may pose a direct contact threat to individuals entering the Site. 40 CFR 300 .415 (b) (2) (iv) High levels of hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants in soils largely at or near the surface, that may migrate Lead on surface soils may migrate via wind or surface runoff onto adjacent properties . The Site is adjacent to private residential properties and less than . 5 miles away from the North River Canal which flows into the Salem Sound. The proximity of the contaminated areas of the Site- may increase this threat of migration to the adjacent properties. 40 CFR 300.415 (b) (2) (vi) Threat of fire or explosion Ignitable hazardous substances in drums exist at the Site. The structure has clearly been vandalized by trespassers. Building-a' s floors are covered with ) 6 paper and other trash from vandalism and other trespassing activities. These conditions pose a threat of fire or explosion. If a fire does occur in the building, the substances present would be released in .the .atmosphere. 40 CFR 300.415 (b) (2) (vii) The availability of other_ appropriate federal or state response mechanisms to respond to the release Neither state nor local authorities have the resources to address the contaminated surface soils at the Site. Chromium-Children who come in contact with Chromium contamination may be .at increased risk of developing noncancerous health effects possibly including skin irritation and contact dermatitis. Inhalation of airborne dust particles is a possible route of exposure . PCBs- Exposure to PCBs pose a variety of health impacts.. _ PCBs are classified as a .B2 probable human carcinogen, are liver toxins and possibly cause peripheral- neuropathy (nerve disease in extremities) . PCBs have been found to .cause rashes (edema of face and hands, simple erythematous eruptions with pruritus, acute eczematous contact dermatitis, and chloracne) subcutaneous edema .and hyperpigmentation of skin and mucous membranes; excessive secretions . from the eyelids (hyperactive Meibomian glands; conjunctivitis; and edema of the eyelids) ; formation of keratin cysts in and hyperplasia of epithelial layer of hair follicles; increase in liver size (hepatic hypertrophy) ; decreases in number of red blood cells and hemoglobin; serum hyperlipidemia; and increases in numbers of white blood cells in the body (leukocytosis) . Various studies have found that exposure to PCBs may cause irregular menstrual cycles, and increased PCB serum levels may cause pathological pregnancies (toxemia of pregnancy, and abortions) stillbirths, underweight births, etc. Mother' s milk contaminated with PCB' s appears to be a source of exposure for infants . Developmental abnormalities have been observed in PCB-intoxicated infants . LEAD- Lead is -a probable human carcinogen, since it has been proven to cause kidney cancer in laboratory animals. Exposure to high levels of lead can cause brain and kidney damage. Lead exposure may increase blood pressure in middle-aged men and has been known to 7 damage parts of -the male reproductive system. Lead is l also well known -for its effects on young children, who / are more likely to be exposed to lead due to hand-to- mouth activity.. . In children, lead exposure has been shown to decrease intelligence (IQ) scores, slow their growth, and cause hearing problems . If .a pregnant woman is exposed to lead, it can be carried to the -unborn child and cause premature birth, low birth weight, or even abortion. ARSENIC- Inorganic arsenic is a human poison. The DHHS has determined that arsenic is a known carcinogen. Breathing inorganic arsenic increases the risk of lung cancer. Ingesting inorganic arsenic increases the risk of skin cancer and tumors of the bladder, kidney, liver and lung. B. Threats to the Environment The .Site is situated less than one half of a mile from the North River Canal which flows into the Salem Sound. Potential. receptors of the contaminants may include fish and other organisms such as shell fish dependent upon the North River Canal and Salem Sound. Portions of the river and sound are used for recreational activities such as swimming and recreational fishing. 1 The Site poses the following threats to the environment : 1 4.0 CFR 300.415 (b) (2) (i) Actual .or potential exposure to nearby human populations, animals, or the food chain from hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants" PCBs, lead -and chromium contamination at the . Site may pose a contact threat to ecological receptors and may enter the food chain. 40 CFR 300.415 (b). (2) (iv) "High levels of hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants in soils largely at or near the surface, that may migrate] . Lead contamination in surface soils may migrate via surface runoff.. The proximity of the contaminated areas to the surface waters may increase this threat of migration 40 CFR 300.415 (b) (2) (vii) The availability of other appropriate federal or state response mechanisms to respond to the release l J 8 Neither state nor local authorities have the resources to address the contaminated surface soils at the Site. IV. ENDANGERMENT DETERMINATION Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances. -at or from this Site, if not addressed by implementing the response action selected in this Action Memorandum, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, or welfare, or the environment . V. PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS A. Proposed Actions 1. Proposed Action Description The actions required to mitigate the threats. outlined herein, are given below. At this time; indications are t that the PRPs. will not perform this work. The proposed actions will protect public health, welfare and the environment by preventing people or animals , to come into contact with the contaminated areas of the Site. The proposed actions are as follows : 1) take measures to prevent unauthorized access to the Site. These measures may include repairing or installing additional security fencing and/or providing 24, hour security during the removal activities; 2) conduct additional sampling of interior and exterior floor surfaces as well as drums, pails and settling pits; 3.) the hazardous waste contamination on the floor surfaces will be swept up, consolidated and .staged. The content of drums, vats, containers and settling pits, will be categorized, containerized, and staged. The exterior lead contaminated soil will be collected and staged. All waste streams will be manifested and shipped off-site for appropriate re-use or disposal at an EPA-approved disposal facility. 2 . Contribution to Remedial Performance Petforming this removal action will contribute to remedial performance and protect public health and the environment by eliminating the potential for exposure to -contaminated areas of the Site and preventing the 9 further release of hazardous substances to the environment . 3 . Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Regulations The cleanup standards, standards of control, and other substantive requirements that .have been identified' to- date, are listed. below, and are applicable within the confines of EPA Publication 540/P-91/011, "Superfund Removal Procedures : Guidance on -the Consideration of ARARs During Removal Actions . " FEDERAL; ACTION-SPECIFIC 29. CFR Parts 1910. 1926, and 1904 : OSHA Health and Safety Regulations 40 CFR Part 262 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste : Subpart B - The Manifest 262 . 20 : General requirements for manifesting 262 . 21 : Acquisition of manifests 262 . 22 : Number of copies of manifests 262 .23 : Use of the manifest Subpart C - Pre-Transport Requirements 262 .30 . Packaging 26,2 .31 : Labeling 262 . 32 : Marking Subpart D - Recordkeeping and Reporting 262 .40 : Recordkeeping 40 CFR Part 264 Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities : Subpart I - Use and Management of Containers 264 . 171 : Condition of containers 264 . 172 : Compatibility of waste with containers 264 . 173 : Management of containers . 264 . 174 : Inspections of containers 264 . 177 : Special requirements for incompatible wastes 40 CFR Part 264 Hazardous Waste Regulations - RCRA Subtitle C: 10 268-270 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments Land Disposal Restrictions Rule 40 CFR .Part 300 .440 Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-Site Response Actions (Off-Site Rule) 40 -CFR: Part 761 . 60 and Parts 761. 202-218 : TSCA requirements for disposal of PBS 49 CFR Parts 171-179 : Department of Transportation Regulations for Transport of Hazardous Materials The OSC -has requested that the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection identify State ARARS for =consideration by the OSC. B. Estimated Costs and Schedule The OSC has prepared an independent government estimate of the - cost . associated with carrying out the proposed actions outlined above. A summary of this estimate is given -below. - The action is anticipated to be complete within eight months of its commencement . EXTRAMURAL COSTS • ERCS COSTS: Labor & Equipment $ 75, 000 Lab Analysis $ 5, 000 Transportation & Disposal $ 50, 000 ERCS COST TOTAL $ 130, 000 START COSTS: 50, 000 SUBTOTAL, EXTRAMURAL COSTS $ 180, 000 EXTRA COSTS CONTINGENCY (200 of Subtotal, Extramural costs) +$ 36, 000 TOTAL EXTRAMURAL COSTS $ 216, 000 INTRAMURAL COSTS• Labor, Expenses, Subsistence $ 70, 000 TOTAL, REMOVAL PROJECT CEILING $ 286, 000 11 VI. EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE SITUATION SHOULD ACTION BE DELAYED OR l NOT TAKEN. l In the absence .of *the removal action described herein, conditions at the Site can be expected to remain unaddressed, and threats associated with the abandoned hazardous substances will persist. VII. OUTSTANDING POLICY ISSUES There are no known policy issues that are outstanding with respect to this. removal action. VIII. ENFORCEMENT ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT - FOR INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY IX. RECOMMENDATION This decision document represents the selected removal action for the Flynntan Site in Salem, Massachusetts, developed in accordance with CERCLA, as amended, and not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan (NCP) . The basis for this decision will be documented in the Administrative Record to be established for this Site . Conditions at the Site meet the NCP Section 300 .415 (b) (2) criteria for a removal due to the following: "Actual' or potential exposure to nearby human populations, animals, or the food chain from hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants" [§300 .415 (b) (2) (i) ] , "Threat of fire or explosion" -[§300 .415 (b) (2) (vi) ] "Hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants in drums, barrels, tanks, or other bulk- storage containers, that may pose a threat of release" [§300 .415 (b) (2) (iii) ] . "Weather conditions that, may cause hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants to migrate or be released" 1§300 .415 (b) (2.) (v) ] . "The availability of other appropriate federal or state response mechanisms to respond to the release [§300 .415 (b) (2) (vii) ] . 12 I recommend you approve $ 286, 000 to initiate the removal action proposed above; of which as much as $ 156, 0.00 is .from the EPA . removal allowance. Expenditure will be limited to the categories .of START and Intramural for the purpose of monitoring compliance with an Administrative. Order, should the' PRP perform the cleanup. APPROVAL f ` DATE: DISAPPROVAL: DATE: 13 REMOVAL PROGRAM PRELIMINARY-ASSESSMENT/ SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR THE FLYNN TAN SITE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 14 APRIL 1998 Prepared For: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency g Y Region I Emergency Planning and Response Branch John F. Kennedy Federal Building Boston, MA 02203 CONTRACT NO. 68-W5-0009 TDD NO. 98-05-0077 PCS NO. 5076 DC NO. R-1523 Submitted By: Roy F. Weston, Inc. Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team 217 Middlesex Turnpike Burlington, MA 01803 June 1998 TABLE 1 Sample Descriptions ------------ _.w _ __ y --------------- -_ : __ < - act e �rlt - D-001 Drum Grab N/A Black Viscous Blue plastic drum labeled "corrosive" D-002 Drum Grab N/A Brown Viscous Blue plastic drum labeled "coagi lite" D-003 Drum Grab N/A Brown Viscous N/A D-004 Drum Grab N/A Clear Viscous N/A D- 005 Drum Grab N/A Clear Viscous 55-gallon drum labeled "formic acid" D-006. Drum Grab N/A Clear Viscous 55-gallon drum.labeled "fuel oil additive" D- 007 Drum Grab N/A Orange Thick N/A D-008 Drum Grab N/A Dark Viscous N/A D-009 Drum Grab N/A Clear Viscous Drum labeled "chrom' com lex in iso ro anol" .D-010 Drum Grab N/A Clear Viscous I N/A D-011 Drum Grab N/A Clear Viscous N/A T-001A Tank Grab N/A Clear Viscous Liquid from settling Liquid tank T-OO1B Tank Grab N/A Brown Muddy Sludge from bottom of Sludge settlime tank T-003 Tank Grab N/A Clear Viscous Liquid from settling Li id tank S-001 Soil Grab N/A Brown Sil Solid from vat tub S-002 Soil Grab N/A Brown Silty Solid from vat tub S-003 Soil Grab N/A Reddish Silty Solid from trench . S-004 Soil Grab N/A. Reddish Silty Solid from trench S-005 Soil Grab N/A Brown Sil Solid from trench S-006 Soil Grab N/A Reddish Silty Solid from hole in the round S-007 .Soil Grab N/A Brown Silly Solid from trench S-008 Soil Grab N/A Brown Silty Solid from trench PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET Flynn Tan Property Site, Salem, Massachusetts D -001 D - O02 D - 0 D - 004 y - E SCENE: View of sample locations D-001,D-002,D7003,and D-004 located in storage room on the first floor. FRAME.NUMBER: 1 DATE: 4/17/98 TIME: 1000 . SKY CONDITION: Inside PHOTO BY: Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES): Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic FILM TYPE: 35 mm FILM ROLL: 95484 1 1 C - 02 fSCENE: View facing west of former exterior transformer pad and sample location C-02. FRAME NUMBER:2 DATE: 4/17/98 TIME: 1010 W-Y CONDITION:Cloudy PHOTO BY: Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES): Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic FILM TYPE:35 mm -FILM ROLL: 95484 TDD No. 98-04-0016 Page I of 6 PCS No. 5076 PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET Flynn Tan Property Site, Salem, Massachusetts ti ti V 2 SCENE: View facing'west of former transformer pad and sample location C-02. FRAME NUMBER:3 DATE: 4/17/93 TIME: 1010 SKY CONDITION:Cloudy PHOTO BY: Patricia.Coppolino WITNESS(ES): Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic FILM TYPE:35 nun FILM ROLL: 95484 F CAPACITOR SCENE:Interior view facing toward laboratory room in basement. A capacitor,still connected,can be seen at upper left. FRAME NUMBER:4 DATE:4/17/98 TIME: 1020 SKY CONDITION:Inside PHOTO BY: Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES): Todd Borci MERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic _1,M TYPE:35 mm FILM ROLL: 77270 TDD No.98-04-0016 Page 2 of 6 PCS No.5076 PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET Flynn Tan Property Site, Salem, Massachusetts CAPACITORS SCENE:Interior view of basement Engine Room. Two connected capacitors can be seen at center. Two identical connected capacitors are out of view to the right. FRAME NUMBER: 5 DATE:4/17/98 TI11M: 1030 SKY CONDITION: Inside PHOTO BY:Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES):Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic FILM TYPE: 35 mm FILM ROLL: 77270 k'L SCENE: View facing east of southwestern portion of Flynn Tan building. I FRAME NUMBER:6 DATE:4/17/98 TIME: 1040 SKY CONDITION:Cloudy PHOTO BY: Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES): Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic i FILM TYPE:35 mm FILM ROLL: 77270 TDD No. 98-04-0016 Page 3 of 6 PCS No.5076 PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET Flynn Tan Property Site, Salem, Massachusetts CAPACITORS r C - Di a ; SCENE:Interior view of center basement area and sample location C-01. Three capacitors(one leaking oil)can be seen at center. FRAME NUMBER: 7 DATE:4/17/98 TIME: 1100 SKY CONDITION:Inside PHOTO BY: Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES):Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic FILM TYPE:35 mm FILM ROLL: 77270 S - 006 SCENE:Interior view of sample location S-006. FRAME NUMBER:8 DATE:4/17/98 TIME: 1110 SKY CONDITION:Inside PHOTO BY: Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES): Todd Borci 'AMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic -'ELM TYPE:35 mm FILM ROLL: 77270 TDD No.98-04-0016 Page 4 of 6 PCS No.5076 � ' R w bm MIMNI _ �r , - • _ v -�. 7`�. '" .,�_ �.�.�.•��;�i Fo - ti_�''�i..�s-,F'�c.-.ter a �� ,`x 11 1 ' n ' • '1 PHOTOGRAPHY LOG SHEET Flynn Tan Property Site, Salem, Massachusetts D -010 D-005 SCENE: Interior view-facing sample locations D-005 and D-010. Broken bags of pumice can be seen at lower right. FRAME.NUMBER: 11 DATE:4/17/98 TIME: 1210 SKY CONDITION:Inside PHOTO BY:Patricia Coppolino WITNESS(ES):Todd Borci CAMERA: Olympus SETTING: Automatic FILM TYPE:35 mm FILM ROLL: 77270 Roy F.Weston,Inc. 217 Middlesex Turnpike Burlington,Massachusetts 01803-3308 qM@SDES1GNMS)C0USULTMTS SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM EPA CONTRACT 68-W5-0009 NEG ATIVES TDD No.98-04-0016 Page 6 of 6 PCS No.5076 cod U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY POLLUTION REPORT I . HEADING DATE : JULY 20, 1998. SUBJECT: FLYNNTAN SITE POLREP #1 LOCATION: 70-92 BOSTON STREET, SALEM, MA SITE ID NUMBER: 015Y CERCLIS NUMBER: MA0002333433 OSC:. A. HATZOPOULOS, USEPA, OFFICE OF SITE REMEDIATION .AND RESTORATION, SECT. II OFFICE PHONE ## : 617-573-5759 (OFFICE) ACTION MEMO STATUS : FUND LEAD INCEPTION DATE.: JULY 61 1998 DEMOBILIZATION DATE: TBD II . BACKGROUND The Site is located at 70-92 Boston Street in 'Salem, Massachusetts . The Site is approximately 1 .90 acres and is an abandoned leather tanning factory located in a heavily populated residential/commercial area of Salem, Massachusetts . The Site is fenced with locking gates at several entrances of the Site . . However, the fence does not preclude unauthorized access. Evidence from graffiti and other vandalism activities that children and others had been entering the Site. The closest residential property is less than 100 feet away from the Site. An estimated 1, 000 people re.side/work .25 miles of the Site. A day care facility is located .2 miles west of the Site. Within. a 1-mile radius there are 5- other schools, one of which is Salem High School . Most of the windows and doors of the entire structure are either broken, missing or have been replaced by temporary plywood_ The primary threats that will .be removed from the Site consist of ignitable and caustic substances in drums/tanks as .well as leaking electrical capacitors and metal tanning residues/dust such as chromium and lead on the floors, drains, settling pits and exterior grounds _ Contaminants found at the site include but are not limited to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , lead and chromium. III . ACTIONS On July 6, 1998 , the ERCS contractor and the START contractor - mobilized to the site. To date FRCS has : 1) established security, 2) prepared --th-e -Site for the removal action activities i _e . set up utilities (phones, fax, electricity, water etc) 2 / 3) cleared and staged the debris from the manufacturing floor, 4) began the consolidating the floor and drain waste, 5) categorized and staged the hazardous -materials found in. drums/containers, 6) di-sassembled, staged and containerized all PCB contaminated electrical components, 7) prepared and put out bids for the transportation and disposal of the hazardous materials IV. FINANCIAL The removal project ceiling defined in the Action Memorandum is $286, 000 . 00 CEILING CHARGED BALANCE ERGS $130, 000 $32, 000 $98, 000 EPA $ 70, 000 $11, 000 '$59, 000 START $ 50, 000 $10, 000 $40, 000 CONTINGENCY $ 36, 000 -0- $36,000 TOTAL $286,000 $53,000 $233, 000 i The above cost estimate is based on figures known to the OS at the time this POLREP was written. The cost accounting does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery. V. FUTURE PLANS ERGS will continue to consolidate the contaminants on the floors, drains and pits for transportation and disposal. CASE PENDS LAIM Kt lt--UTATION SERVICES P.02 108P0411398 12:49 4129545536 MAX P'A6E ec 1w.1srls corw):11-r4s?W Of rtw"5,LvewA owmsnrt Of 9PM9+nawrac ARSOWa: c ■6AR[rlV Of W&M 1fi"hr=ld1^T F*AM 25it SOURCE REDUCTION tTRATEGY 6tUuraal°tn��+atlon ` This N+t Murt br contridter. The iMornwtbn co insd in this Gerveretor• -5 EP fora+is v th ut and ca To e best of my kn*wWgt a Witf. Gorttea�r+o�+rThts: _ AhoM kvmber_ Mafiirlgrasf: trarer��t q�pm Qt nre Ida np-203 FxilitylLddrts�: nvwreal MWOR W twaWnf.�dirtra� d Dits fadNWS)CCad*": . t. Wave stroomnsi me and dowiption: Q Ars;dwa l wasm ","*us,"*us Waft Leatl�Qr manus�a°cf�vrinq slvdc}�.. 3. SOUM4 radaedon actiam takAn 4urifig the Pon fivti yaers. You should quantifY A�y reBirt Joq in the wreight or toslcfty of wage and malmain records`z documem this redwolan. TN;Question s lnundid•to 91vs recogr9xJon for pastsswr"rodwetion acM wrenwens. Sovcc-e rodVG�io�1 I.S ho'� appt.'C2{aie . Was'Ec s cfenet��ec� com en P-?A t.RCs �'ennava ( .. 9: Stets vvhw*#dr you he" astebliOwd a source r44uW*n program. You may Indude a rtawmem of toP rnanagown*wn's suppsrt or corp cwxw sourve r"wctfon goals. ST.'90-d eat!! t--MY T L/--Md Tt-t e4-s 4 Ol "dfa r,ITatJdd� �4►!� Mill Serr►ice.Im 1915 Washinamn Rnjid Piftsburak. PA 1S241=1446 'ibis is to(Warp that bsscdon `C tilerat�c's j{ yy �-t>m Waucdeso6bcdbWOWdots'1Ql eshihit'be fa IcWi waste chs"cmd"ks per 44-CFR(261,20-261.24), n8'har�rdatLs Do 12 thm DO 17 DUOI/IgnitabiIity D009:Mercury 73oi8 thou D1343 DW3fxcaci ty 1n addition. the: vraste does aot cowAin mate thaw 2 parts prr million PCB's sad is am a listed waits [ K. P of U 1 er 40 CFR(261-31-261.)3)). 711e fiailowin9 do sm esiat is,ram tmless Chocload below: H � S:a.edovs ConataW ig ` �my� x CCYDG Acomoe AZ"plicroaa � s,ltieegrlemiao.�uarena Jticrylo x — � -� 4-hmiaeDiPbegyl � �tamido bon-DHC_ �aHC dpba-HHC Demedalonth cob Hrntai t�lotidc _� Qam�a-IiHC ' 9-16(mipynr- 8etuofn}Fl1>tis7mtt►eat Heertde J �O�O�'1''��" �t1-Cb[oioedaxylme�o� Baarn(k}�:ora�tAene esi(2-CbtomiaoQe:spyt?�eber x Ka-FsmymvcrDphtbsla� bisa-chic. $mmumr�aee X -- vrbmodfabloto X Bs�rbeayt ptteaye&net v Bu�yi.[cobol i X 11►nY[t +t D[>�4m 2 s•ryt.t,d-aini�obbcav[ Cuban Cai4wn tsaacbiodda x s C'hl-bber� 2 1ee�13-b+.sdinae X x Cbiamadsar K C ilaeodabrbmaebwoo c k C6lomforin x ¢C.bioro-minziol 2-cheob=mYl vinyl fthcr It `— I•Cd[ompkurjol D losoPmAYk+c x o.P-DDE A.P-DDD pp-L1D£ wP DDT aP-DDT . tyDintoeun•I.eeto p� % Dtt�at(�,L}aad� X `_ � l.lrDibtv.n.Y....,� .vmomedaai x — ,.. x D;chr�m� x P-D;Cbd�b.Azk e x x t,t D;�,d�m.:x x .2-D'or ao't x _ I.t-nieJslneo.ray�-i,e x _' . y�. x -- .E-�rQDf 1 2 n,�trn x — �-t.9-Dloniomprnpyic.a X D'wld:ia mPmP+ aa-�'7-Dlsi►{on°P Y x Poimftxh Z.4-Di,net�yl pbeoo[ Dori� � Di-u- KWI PeoLalaac Dlmc:byt 1.4- aobeoxcae a_6-Dinu�<� DL-Vn - 2• 0�" 2.6-AioiDhdaordaepe to-xqi P�� Y '°° t Lpgountr D X ID mine IKplvnytalnn. c !.2-D4AwayIhyAn u- D ada i°'i'u�I Eososu[fsn 4 Etld6itllE►n salA 43e'drin uaenre� 2-BWo�erbaaal(t�oAs} MY[bona x -- Pmrr+� x fir[eifier x Em e r"&A� • F�yzeK o:•.ac .� -- r tYk Fn:onea — F-opb'ar Fb"MM&enc fiexaebbcobutsdime x Hezaehlaer�yelopen6diene �'��+b+�4'p•��iru �- Sexad+iarodihec�rofuratts _- Sc*+chloiePmPY�pyteoe todoapcduco Iraboryl atoobol U�wt�.m[I X tsodFm lu ty MtlLacrylor�m7a 1 nc x �� we&-pyn7cno \ 3 4,4-?.Lctl�ylane b:� Mahyieue CWaxick i J Z9 mvel xvW 96s&VGsZLtF 6111, 0- T 866T/0T/80 F-0 -;Do--j r_.t-set Es:;.T 0T-e0•86G;z Et-so ir.L szt-61 of rri3 r:i-I'n+t18z: 1"ini6jd �mephyt edyl Ctrone — M*�grt arcaar�ltpntrC � Mir/tatir�l kerana X `_ Merlryf a+'c�aGbluti — N-lilde�pi�aeidlaa _ N'� �Ie�1tm1DG ,__ IQi� bonne — tcpephtnat Pcnocbbmeia4benzcns �� Fhtlulic acid YdrldG p>oplY/Z1i�ilG(13aLyl cyanide) X pynbe- 1'merami0r Sarcje 1.2,4.3-h�chlambrueeo pl�idiae Takwidoeodibe=afaruss 1.i.i 2 Temc4lorc:have }[ tb°a'�O-Ddio 2`ettachtoroc$ryl<z,6 X_ 1.1.1.LTeanhterocrhusr 1 Tdtxom4zssbaeo oiromn&eW x 2.3.4.6-Ts�aeNurn:7cno1 Tokm 1.1.2-25richloroedunc ]C —' ' �°p k 1.1.1-ac i roeshax ? ._. 2A---TdEh"r mMen*Xyntcr c icid 1��=IySc6lotop+op�e x °aw��epedune _ r.r%-Tdchtora- A2213 t sp AMk.&s d&. X Xytetuit `: x B1-M6carb B+�"a &uYzAl-- CAr"I P1 Seromy! Carboknu •.eti•...e:1yt a�edeyleart�am.ee -- CaMofirrun pbenol _ Dlmcrlaa Gyao'm Dicd�ykrae' reo1,dLYtbamara Formr Hoare�ydeechleride D`woo"Un�(moil) EPTC gprMp.r,w..r Isolan Mcdriocub Metoiearb — h$eri��.fi.t —� I44[arluiny] p--y( i Molkaa� Pcbatnc PSysoodfAimo 1thY+osuirain.ssii�y(afc '"— i Pmphim p� � Thiodkarb 'i Prvarit5cr Tnalbro 2lzsnphasyEo-tuetltyl � � ftylantim AUyl alcohol x g��A cwod X x � X 13rb.+.oehlorcmub.yo eru Hutyl a{;o1�1 X it-bawl X aer Butsrl txnzene xoerr Beryl beaxcm X Isoae'laa�arla x 2 aloeo+throor x ch6ramemyl&Cdtyl dher x 4 Chlv[v8olnaaa X C,olnaaldc6 d. -��,t 1,3-Diot:loropropiaa a( x X eD-l.Z --awl X l.t-DicNoropropcne X 2-2 DicLlp.apropaoo X t.I-DicWo4� pmpatlo( X WICbloctgrdris X FQueol X 8taykne]r(ytl X 1lcaartwro-a mc�yl yDr°Psaol x He akmm,4 l X Y apy1�o1+al(2-plop l) x . __ p�Proryt avUAr.�e . x ly X IsePsop Propianianc )C —� (.pmp of x 2Propyibcei'eee xs>icnrta xo-Tolufdinc X 1.2.3-Trichl� X 1;,4-TdmelRyr>scnrsne X 1.3 t_Trimeftyl bconcm x Note 1- Voluik orpxgic cpmPO-M(CCVOC)per 40 CPR 2"SUbpan CC. Company NaMe Waste Nam Sign bat jp Q Prinlcd Nsal d _ �tlr 1/.S. EPA c t3lM.l (Jtil/Y[1� E0 Jwtii xvW 9£59b�BZib 66=Et 966T/AI/89 F-O .E:O...J .-.t-su 0 t-ep t Et-SO T r-L eus 01 U.S . ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY POLLUTION REPORT I . HEADING DATE: AUGUST 6, 1998' SUBJECT: FLYNNTAN SITE - POLREP #2 LOCATION: 70-92 BOSTON STREET, SALEM, MA SITE ID NUMBER: 015Y CERCLIS NUMBER MA0002333433 OSC: A. HATZOPOULOS, USEPA, OFFICE OF SITE RLMEDIATION AND RESTORATION, SECT. II OFFICE PHONE #: 617-573-5759 (OFFICE) ACTION MEMO STATUS : FUND LEAD . INCEPTION DATE: JULY 6; 1998 DEMOBILIZATION DATE: TBD II . BACKGROUND J The Site is located at 70-92 Boston Street in Salem, Massachusetts . The Site is approximately 1.90 acres and is an abandoned leather tanning factory located in a heavily populated residential/commercial area of Salem, Massachusetts. Contaminants found at the site include but are not limited to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , lead and chromium. For further background information, please refer to POLREP No. 1. III . ACTIONS (July 20, 1998 through August 13, 1998) For details of .actions completed prior to July 20, 1998, please refer to POLREP No. 1 . 1) completed the dismantling of capacitors and their placement in drums pending disposal; 2) completed the clearing and staging of debris within the site building; 3) completed consolidating the floor and trench waste pending removal with a vactor truck; 4) completed the transfer of solvent liquid from an aboveground. storage tank into ,two drums .which were staged pending disposal; .5) completed hazard categorization testing of hazardous materials in drums; 6) completed waste stream categorization and staging the hazardous materials found in drums/containers; 7) completed compatibility testing on hazardous materials in drums; 8) completed the -consolidation of compatible drums for disposal and overpacking of two drums-;. 9) completed the laboratory packaging of small containers for disposal; 10) completed the staging of 8 wooden vats; 11) prepared and put out bids for the transportation and disposal of the hazardous .materials including wastewater, 2 sludge/soil, and drums; 12) completed the transport and disposal of one. shipment of wastewater from on site sumps/pits; 13) completed the removal of a. limited amount of lead and chromium contaminated surface soil and its staging pending disposal; 14) completed the cutting and staging of plywood provided by the City of Salem for covering interior trenches and pits; and 15) completed the segregation of contaminated wood and debris pending disposal. IV. FINANCIAL The removal project .ceiling defined in the Action Memorandum is $286, 000 . 00 . CEILING CHARGED BALANCE ERGS $130, 000.- $75,400 $54,600 EPA $ 70, 000 $20,000 $50,000 START $ 50, 000 $13, 000 $37,000 CONTINGENCY $ 36, 000 -0- $36, 0.00 TOTAL $286, 000 $108,400 $177, 600 The above cost estimate is based on figures known to the OSC at the time this POLREP was written. The cost accounting does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery. V.. FUTURE PLANS ERCS will . . . . CASE PENDS 3.5 Interior Extent-of-Contamination Sampling Survey On 20 July 1998, OSC Hatzopoulos and START member Sullivan utilized a drill to collect samples of wood from the floors, walls,beams,and saw horses within the site building. A total of two grab samples(H-003 and F-003A)and six composite samples(F-004,F-003,W- 002, W-004, F-002, and F-002A) of wood were collected. In addition, one grab sample of peeling paint(P-003)was collected-from a wall within the building for determination of lead content,and one grab sample ofpotential asbestos-containing insulation material(ACM)was collected from a boiler on the third floor(A-001). All of the samples were transported to NERL for various analyses including metals,SVOCs,PCBs,and asbestos depending on the type of contamination expected based on visual observations of the sample area. (See Appendix,F - Metals Analytical Data, Appendix G - Semivolatile Organic Compounds Analytical Data,Appendix K-Polychlorinated Biphenyls Analytical Data,and Appendix L- Asbestos Analytical Data). 3.6 Aboveground and Underground Storage Tanks + 3.6.1 Above ound Storage Tanks On 20 July 1998, the liquid contents of two aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) located in the solvent recovery room were sampled and subject to hazard categorization testing. The liquid in the first AST, which had a capacity of approximately 200 gallons, was determined to be non-hazardous so it was left in place. The liquid in the second AST,which had a capacity of approximately 1,000 gallons, was determined to be solvent-like in its characteristics. On 24 July 1998,the contents of the approximately 1,000-gallon capacity AST were transferred into two drums and staged pending disposal with the other drums from the site(see Section 3.3). A third approximately 500-gallon capacity AST located in the warehouse portion of the site buildings was investigated and found to be empty. 3.6.2 Underground Storage Tanks Allegedly, six USTs exist on the site property. Upon investigation, it was observed that the fill pipes on several of the tanks were filled with concrete. Based on this observation, it was determined that the tanks had most likely been filled with sand and/or removed. 3.7 Lead- and Chromium-Contaminated Surface Soil Beginning on 31 July 1998,ERCS personnel,utilizing hand shovels,removed approximately 5 cubic yards of contaminated surface soil from the area adjacent to the southwest portion of the site buildings. The soil was removed due to the presence of elevated levels of lead and chromium as evidenced by results of laboratory analyses of surface soil samples collected during the PA/SI,results of on-site metals screening of samples collected on 29 June 1998, 6 and results of laboratory analyses performed at NERL on samples collected from this area 1. on 8 July 1998 (see Section 3.1) . The contaminated soil was transferred through a chute constructed primarily'of polyethylene sheeting into the building's first floor,where it was staged pending disposal with compatible sludge waste from the trenches and pits (See Appendix C- Sample Location Diagram for area of surface soil removal). On 10 September 1998,the soil was removed from the staging area with a vactor truck and transported with the sludge from the pits for disposal(See Section 3.2). 3.8 Automotive Batteries On 20 August 1998, eight automotive batteries that had been staged during ongoing site activities were transported off-site for disposal by CV/CC to the State Line Scrap Co.,Inc. in South Attleboro, Massachusetts for recycling. 3.9 Leather Hides On 27 October 1998,CV/CC transported 1 cubic yard of leather hides to the CV/CC facility in Elizabeth,NJ for disposal. The hides,which were removed from various locations within and along the building exterior,had been staged in a pile within the building on top of and covered by polyethylene sheeting. 3.10 Contaminated Personal Protective Equipment .On 30 September 1998,a subcontractor to Capitol Environmental transported approximately 10 cubic yards of contaminated PPE generated during the removal action to the Waste Management facility in Norridgewock,ME for disposal. 3.11 Site Shutdown Activities and Demobilization Preparations for site shutdown wereperformed concurrently with ongoing removal activities. These activities included measures designed to minimize physical hazards to any authorized personnel who may enter the site and its buildings following demobilization of EPA and its -contractors. The City of Salem provided 20 sheets of plywood that were used to construct walkways traversing open trenches and to cover open pits. Caution tape and signs warning of the presence of the trenches were also posted. By 20 September 1998, all personnel and supplies were demobilized from the site. Rented office equipment was returned, and utility services (telephone, electrical, and water) were disconnected.- Additional work beyond 20 September 1998 is described in Sections 3.9 and 3.10. An additional approximately 60 cubic yards of chromium-contaminated soil located on the slope adjacent to the southwest side of the site building was left in place. Although removal of contaminated soil from this location was performed(See Section 3.7),additional materials suspected to contain chromium became visible following a heavy rainstorm which eroded 7 portions of the remaining surface soil. The material, which does not appear to have the ability to migrate,is inaccessible to trespassers as well as to heavy equipment that would be necessary to remove the additional soil. In addition,insulating material on a boiler located at a relatively inaccessible location on the first floor of the site building, which was determined to contain asbestos(See Section 3.5), was left in place. 8 Appendix A Site Location Map (Figure 1) R : r'• • ice. I Course' F f ♦ IN HA Sch 1 j Alain& •I. _ _ - ' yG t Course;;,," /- :� ,I Bart. i \G. t sch - Sch _ J.' ta 1 1 L M � _ - •` 1 HIgA G • h! .��_ • !�� '�� _ - t sr _� - SITE � /• ., r• - Needham a •• C Hat -'N u sr _ re. r� &--loMd� -R _ park- ■ •S f e '� -+ �ti/emow, i we '9 Water t. :•\� . :J,9orth Substa .cam ' • .•N C 22 if rouna ea&ldv r- 01 sea" (r i�q -Substir% • _�/ - -" •.tee. vsfr �' —r br—~J J_• \ Golf.Course Sch 2.� '• � � BASE MAP IS A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING 7.5 X 15• U.S.G.S. OUADRANGLE(S): Salem, MassaohuseNs. 1985 1 1/2 p 1 MILE . 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET WADRANGLE LOCATION SITE LOCATION MAP Flynntan Site R MANAGERS orscrrtas/toNsuLTANn ° 70 92 Boston Street _ REGION I SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE TEAM TOD / DRAWN BY: DATE S a l e m, Massachusetts 98-06-0013 J. SULUVAN ,2/98 FILE NAME: R:\98040006\figl.dwg FIGURE 1 Appendix B Site Diagram (Figure 2) a O~ (n Z W Z O Ir z V)QLD ` � 1 r z J � 0 0 ,3 00 j W IV W O� Q� Oco N z D o 'Ln w < w z :3. N W 'o C9 1 tL- Q V AK) z Q AA z 0 Wo C7 J 2 0 CO t! U' .Z (n 00 0 .0 00 In �� N 0 0 00 J zz�j n W 0o W F " zo W z ao o •.� mozin LLJ Q co J Q V) = Z U 0 0 0� Q Z -0 Q � i (nn ow �_ w zm � O , m rn O f_— cl O (n rn W J C V) z 0 J J Q v W '. O C]0 H W W / Q a)(nvp cr a a:7 I I Z NC ...J J z z= o'' o~ R'W irw V ou 00 Z Z� 0 in C3o n Jo ZZ <t~!lv 7Nv m C)O O O 0 :: Appendix C Sample Location Diagram (Figure 3) ' W J Q Z Z Z Q W O z Z OQ=� U)Q mLL J � , I I ZJ p0 Q O w W g J JJ a(arf ~ 00 M c¢,W w N rn I � a o w o�'- Q Y Q m N NZp T- ``�e^� N � ~ Q .O V (n J LIJ O LL' ■ ■ Q LLI ...r I Z O w U Ld _ _ to p Z _ w L! N O Q Q N Z O Z e7 Q V' ................ .......... j IU 'N oZZN Z y? th ' to rn ti J zi O v Z U � -ZW M M W FW-- � r �--- wox� a O O a EN W V) N O O Q p z W 00 Z. 0JJ O J H AD p N O O p¢(n n- I I OD W F z p1 Q �i Q O N H� O .Oct w� I r Q1 � V1 El N 00 ON ❑�.� ZJ O �r-� I O p O J J F❑ N W Q ial N O.ZOp z LLI F- _ O N N I O I W z 0 ¢�z� F— ~ ❑� U) _ Q F- U `�¢� 9 Q Z z0 < o oJZ Q Z �ZD a Z z m Z $ q CO IL o � Q ; � w o o a m Z O J_ Q M U W I O OQO I N W W w d �02 Q O]fn N Q �Z W JE N a� ¢ Q w / N U �� V) O J ' N N C) w I a ❑ J W Y Y 0 Z z Z 'J 5< 5~ 0�w mt. CW7 C7 GNU Z �< Z �F W0 F 030U1 ZO UI Z Z :D0 0ao W W 0 vp i N DUNKIN 0CL /NLJ N W L DONUTS c c C� W vi W < 0 vs cc m Q W Z J m La 0 \ _ t0 W O d Q m N 1 o c O �00 < p < Z ix p n - = rn 0 < C 000 W/ m C < N O: cr N Z o to W W W W LLI f- in Z in W m G F- (% Z o . V 2 0 0< . m a V Z V o � Q Z .O Q W - r- — Q (n 0 W ►- Z p N <. J W (n (� o Ca N Q Z NLLJ� Z m G pCs cl Q Q OZ J O a C? ' a 0 Z Y W N W W p0 � cr IX p Z m O Q cO (n J < 0 0 . J V 0 < z. W 00 W w 3 v� z W a. O o u 1. o \ Z � O < w v' W Fx o o Q _J N ® Z Q Z '� U U W 0 p j m Z W Z F-W C� v U w w a p W Z z_ w W 0 U a X ~ p U d 0 Z - W Z p p < z 0 Z < J Q U J a 0 p L. m to F•- < W D a U N > < Y (/1 i b Z� o 0 W Z ; WI ; W < 2 00 r W \N r W p' K);' O c M O h O w W F b z : 1 p O a 0 = n m p 0 o mm mo o 0 i m w ¢o. ~ 2 LL IDcoo N ¢ w W �/y m J�0 W V! Cr Q L >>Ul m N ROOM L o �. z ' a) LJLJ p \ I i i0 D ZY O aL-- f _ o M L, O, w ® ® o n O OZa J O a ®® I 9L O p ``�¢ �o ®� N- ¢ CN 0 Q O U. \O 'tom W/ Q 0 cn p W Vl Q 0 W a' F- 0 f-- 2 N ' W m U- © Q to © 1 0 w o O J Q CO 1 o YL, a Q wOF— w v+ 0 I ~ m LLJ Z t: p V) 0 Q�o _O (n NJ = F- ZDU fr o© U Q 0m (a B© o ~ 0 Q o O 00 < 0 © N o a J }Z0-1 coZ- m .Z o o © n- w rn �." 0 o\ Q V) � w V o of N w o.. o0. o o I O I � N m LLJ O O 0 Y © 1 1 OI Q Z a t- F- N F- a Z 0 Z p © 9 * a C7 0000p Q JX = J Z UJ U = U V) U m -� Q U- Q J N ~ p� (E)LOO a F- V) V)LLJ � W r ® CDm J ® -p2 W J s 85� 3 a n o ij a 3an913\9000Vo86\71 :3r(YN all! S113Sf1H3bSSdW `W3�dS 86/OZ/fi QadH3Nt�l,B LLOO-90-26 8001j GN003S 31Y0 :As NM"a ON 001 133N1S NOlS08 06-0L ►VY31 3SNOdS3a ONY 1N3MSS3SSY IY�iNH031 ONnAl3dns 1 N0193a OSIWI-1 =/Sa3N9MG Sa37YNYn 311 S N Vi N N)ll 3 a dVh N0Ild30l 31dWbS -nvoS Ol lON 33Nd81N3 N300 3N1-ObOI W00.21 Ol ad3l -1001 SNIV1S f L W002i 83�18Wf11 Z00—S • Ol ad3l . 5.a1b1S o W008 ldn A 0 Sldn t 00-S • N Y / cc cc O } } Z Z Z Z } Z Z } Z } } } } Z Z Z Z Z } } } } > O O a_ m c`uu c m c c Q c c o 0 � 3 3 U -a —a 0O N0 �O v - -0 OONO µ°_' .c o. = .c " � t -cO w rn o 0 E w w � co co C c m coco co 0 o U) F !L O L C7 mmmm QQUU0 ¢ Q ¢ ¢ E O U OO c � o U a) o CD a a � O O a) � L p U U co .w j co c L L 0 (o Q x - (� c Q co O C C L C 0 � 0 3wooccoow 03 � O co o.: •N j ` 0 U O U a o cu o — _ �0) or ._ m ._ � UU o oQ � — x x a ,. E .N cn o a � Jp -I � a) Ada � � c) C: E E ai Zvx � rn � w L c � x O � cu 9- H � � � 7MOJM co3macoc.� j caCMU � � € - EEc_ c_ LLo i (DmUa. 0000mUcnUm mi— cncnUUlL co co Qu- a. a00 x � (nJJJ.JJJJJJJ (nJJ � (n (n (n (nJJJJJJJJ a) • o o \ \ \ \ \ \ o o o \ \ \ o 0 0 o o j o O ClO 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 to o o to Cl to u) cn o 0 0 0 0 to Un o o cn O LO > N tI) � 00 O NtnI,- N Nt` OOOOtnNNC)C) ) N NLOLOLOOtnLOtn LOC) LOOtOto u C) LOL) uOLOtou7tOtntAOtOtn totoLO LOtOLO to (MtoMtpto LOmti) tOLOuOLOLOtou') LOMO0to 00 04 J N JEC-4 CO ODtOI-- M LOCOM 'TM0O04t- CD NM � u) c01,- 0000 �- N 0 N �- �- �- �- N � N � N N N N N N M m v-) m m (M )M M M t,, 4 "T "'�