Loading...
MEETING PACKET JUNE 2010 00— CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH 120 WASHINGTON STREET,4m FLoOR TEL. (978) 741-1800 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAX(978) 745-0343 MAYOR DGRF.BNBAUM aSAL1M.COM DAVIT)GREINBAUM Am'ING HEAL'114 AGr.N,r NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Board of Health will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 at 7.00 PM at City Hall Annex, 120 Washington St. Room 311, MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to order 2. Approval of Minutes from May 11, 2010 3. Chairperson Announcements 4. Public Health Announcements/Reports/Updates a. Health Agent b. Public Health Nurse c. Administrative d. Councilor Liaison 5. Update on the Gateway Project/Senior Center Project from Acting Health Agent 6. Update on Statewide Regionalization Meeting& Health Agent Position 7. Miscellaneous 8. Adjournment ca Next regularly sedule meeting is Ju1y 1-X,--T010 at 7pm at CiWHAJI Annex, 2Q�Va Wigton Street Room 311 / >. . '> David Gre nbaum Acting Health Agent Cc: Mayor Kimberley Driscoll, Board of Health, City Councilors 1 1 rE 2 R r PUBLIC HEALTH REGIONALIZATION IN IVIASSACHUSETTS: STATEWIDE TELECONFERENCE/WEBINAR `��"� MAY 10, 2010 3-4:30P M. PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC HEALTH REGIONALIZATION WORKING GROUP ��� rt Facilitator: Harold Cox A- Associate Dean, Public Health Practice, Boston University School of Public Health— _�u r 5/7/2010 • John Auerbach, Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Public. Health AGENDA Regionalization Working Group Progress and Ongoing Work • Report on Subcommittee Work-Phoebe Walker, Director of Community Services,Franklin Regional Council of Governments • Workforce Credentialing-Donna Moultrup, Belmont Health Director • The Practice Based Research Network-Justeen Hyde, PhD, Institute for Community Health ddressing-C.ommon--Concerns-about-RegionaaEaa Geoff Wilkinson,Senior Policy Advisor, MDPH Moving Forward with Regionalization • Getting Started at the Local Level-Jack Vondras, Director of Public Health, Gloucester Health Department and Sandra Martin,Health Agent , Town of Egremont and Emergency Planner, Berkshire County Boards of Health Association • 2010-2011 Objectives-Cheryl Sbarra, J.D., MAHB Staff Attorney Question and Answer Session • 2 1 1 THE WORKING &Rnt-IP k,. r[it- �dam!SL • A 1 l 11 pill.. Rik tlz I ©© Ar THE WORKING GROUP le 41 All 'N s r 5/7/2010 • • NACCHO reports 23,000 local public health jobs lost nationwide between 1/08 and 12/09. • 49% of MA Boards of Health received cuts in 2009; 36% lost staff. • 70% of MA towns reported inadequate staffing to meet basic legal responsibilities (2006 survey). • Of the 105 towns with fewer than 5,000 residents, most have no full-time public health staff, health inspector, or public health nurse. • Major cuts to DPH result in reduced technical assistance to local public health. 0 • Local Public Health often lacks resources for: • - • • Reporting on infectious disease cases • Enforcing environmental health regulations • Meeting food inspection requirements • Balancino emergency planning and pandemic response with other work • Preventing chronic and infectious disease • Addressing health disparities 4 1 1 11�®RIGt�G GR®l�P G®AL i TostrengthenMassachusetts public health system by creating sustainable, - • • . • acrossequitable delivery of local public health services • • i 9 Ell =G ®t���� � � � 6 Tsfj PJ --j R�c i or more local health boards or departments collaborating under a formal agreement to provide a specific set of � v g i 5/7/2010 BENEFITS • Consistency and equity in services provided. • Access to a broader range of services and expertise than available in each individual health department. • Economies of scale—maximum impact with limited resources. • Improved opportunities for grants and other resources. • Equity • Impact • Respect • Flexibility • Sustainability _ 6 5/7/2010 • Report on Working Group Subcommittee Work =Y Phoebe Walker Director of Community Services Franklin Regional Council of Governments WORKING GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES ' 2009 T I iT • Developed case statement for regionalization • Proposed professional credentials for regional health staff 7 8 • s r '• i"s r sr w ✓'P t 'srr P N s°s Ps r i r frf r w Jn rti r{ 'grk r°: s r r ri r i rr` {,� i �,}r rryP�r r s �rrrrS,f �.�.r,{rs r{,rrri r w,ti r r rrvS}r{f''r } ii{rr s 4�r it 4 '•r, rti t n,!,°�j;� rr r �, v ti frs M i •. .r ris r1�Crrs r s tv s}sirs tP��}d{„ x,'.r.ro w ryr t,.�'wr'�rr�:,rrsti S,'�rs f$r-•}. � � frrl r r r�r.f r•rr P:irra r�s �r '1`}ti�i r {rs�sr }rrr r{ ti,r s {: :err.r.}: ,s..�i�,.:•r,°r. �..�.r r;�.:X•,. .4s:Pr:;�`::v: �ti11.?T;1r i�r .ti wfrr�,�s st r'��..�:�r v�'G'..�{i}f..,r°}.:+•.:$ r v rrr yti r r ss r: 1 fSrti by r s rr rfsr rsfv tir 7s y ssish}.� r5r rr `y'` fr`� rsf rr s �y�fr ,r}, r"� �h'v� rK}r• },���rs'��r r ti r��rr�}{h'f}A. :rP rsr r r r , 7 i t rirr � i� �' r•..r� ���b dam{,�1 `1r°L irhV ? s � ` of}r s i fP s s sr s ss rf+,} i{ s ti r ti P at � �I i irr i s a 1 r r Js` r r� Y } { r �•�'`� <•• +l ';.d4 i5{Y. i�h r�'ii .i r J'h r r`�' i r 4.t.�, ss ssirr5' {s '4• s {> r `v vi P r i rs tir r yr L"tiv ars�*�,r#�'!��•V'"}Pi�!P s rr P {,*s'4s p�'s'{sr{r^y rr,h}` r �r sf'`w i `� � _ P •i s; r S+r}s rPr�fii s s� s aUr{'•�, }s� �'{'*;s r err r} sr�s� r r _ i t r lC ss},s rrrr. s f r stir 'tM �' 'Y h iYr si"if _� , .... # r i xrr err•'."1`.hvh.;4v�sJ .sg ry}u�rya '�' nV';�•'�,°`S ir'r d s : s � s t ,��V� '� Sa+�" •,rd�' � +�st t h rtir� d "1r'r, ,' sf sir r v's si'4 i r.._�,t �. r�r.}° i s rr r .�;�'}fx i4 �` {s }}�l{ .ti r r tiff.,,•'�;r� r - nislr : i-v �� ,! �....fy } �` ,. _ f' .y. •. ' 's r r4'rr sisr{Zr,r- tih{s��rvi.'y��Prf•i� ��x'1 ,� ��� I ti/��7L''tr �-�. �._ ('~`�'� 1 _ q�T. • �rr v vl,�r r s•,}4f r.°"�q)c'"���,��[`T`l t*�',l, I � J ✓4 .-, t � S F�! ,._. i y{,- '�'`}""' i{,':'f �Y{�h��4 f !� /1 -i T ;m„+,,.•e�.d i'B' —.mot 4�'�{� ,i{r ti rrff }rrsv,, r fss �a s {' rl> •,:-p � •'1 � �r , {^ � n i 1 ri{s sP {r iR$ r "� _ r'"- t i}Fsnzi {s iP �' '}+srr r d ti.{`.}iMP �*� h� tr _�t 1•'�-. / ti � {�� rr ... r � f �J }i•irrf5s!.v,N 'r�X f�-r" .•-"�r `� t s+. i„ ... 4 .,i` r�s}r s ` ` is rs°g s.sr r�}.t R��a#,� r...S;,•^,r.:�; '� ..J J r�r rr '4� � �..{:�':;:ti{ ;?yTN!l "ns'E'v`�'n sfi ^'�'•'}i }rvtfirrr },{ rirt'iti/rlvfr P i r:r tir ��Sr { r r � r•s �'''4 rr 'is:'r Pr�r ^s,S,S{r as},- s v}vr, s �v:}3r psi ,��tk'yr r��rrs s`ir,�, r , ras{P i �.r,S}}it.4.ti. T r}S�y?s'';},tis'}��:,}»"�r,�sr�sn;�y�}�rr�{;�'-�}s�:�;?:�{:r i�. �;r�.`.•'s'?r4',dS}; .�`{.s.}1`!krrr rs` • sl:)LJISLP glleaq leuoL5aa paysilgelsa JO saipnis ase:) paleaa' . aleldwal juawaaage aaueuaano9 Japoua a padolanaa . penuiluool . 0O - . . 0l OZ/L/5 0 0 N rl- LO r R �� r ✓RR 3 i. ,E F t I y 1# .-�f �•.`.'s > { .,t v 5 k-��., t , "`�_±,r¢t�[.t,sr w.: '�"�a a F { RJJ 1„ �• 1 R - w t v ey a ^" R'by y}✓ i I ,3`f. }1 wR1Y,r. 1.✓)i, i. %.'� y,}, '"+.S. { 1 � t a I � � �� 1'.•� y �R � t �...,! { ,�+,•;i t�`}�\,I��' � i § :.r•• ,r",�,: rr ti. •11 r / { i y'I1- M� yt�'.,.�i 3 P�I { a .li I 1. § 1` `�R1 7✓vfi, k�y+r`}�'• t E�., � ! _ t ry (`9 „k+C�,:�la,.,,,i~im {,r i{..sr ..I.j t 'r rf. sy } . R ;i si ��# '�{ �'; a .-i � 6 { l .i`f t=-r � -•"1' "ti��1�: �,S'{ '{{.-�i{�c t i 1 ', e{ s\�- f I 't i {` �' r,+�•�,�•. v✓ .f� { -_� �',��'~ 1?'ti. E $ <�i f {r'—�...;t.•R�4 R�yksti�R"4}�xy•• .•{:�-`�i�I �"S��ir ; _ i �. �..r v r r -.�:�: r j f i � � '-a}�jlil�i—e l y- ��y_ � '�.r�'°�tir".4•.�".: ^�•"�: .r;:.�.y``ti,. -p k �•� iS��{ ���I�`�t I•s�_{ S { r�' rr'"r�:,s•��`�'��•}� r P +' i; ;�{S � �� 1 4 r�.::".;}:' .R?�+.:�: r }• f.1$ !f I } �. { { `�, r r. ? r.: �'• r J 4i I I - i ,'.P ; i = 4u s;„:; }r rr 1R4RR°R"• {v}..• .` R rr x' i e "( {.: { C } r ✓ r :a,:;.: � 1'. � .-�,I { { 'f l i _ � r r yr 1 ti•1 r ti R4. � r,r'� ! I .�I ' � f I{ {_ ;.• { E.I:i )�. 1 ..=i�a� rfd S, Rd R y R v � { �// ' � P Add Rl a^ t r 1 d . ••` f I I : 1 {R ,✓j r ti:y y 1 11 f�� � { k r .1 : :•:v?:•i; � 7 { `' J 1{}ti�r R R :R Rey yR r :r r. _ {� { -ti: {� a rR✓r.:•. wt -! §. - 1: R� :�:•»` '•RR rd 1ti 1Jrti�,,�. ?.{. •,'- rt !a t ! s kry ,. r ✓ f%ti �,.. ..-{ � � $ ..'C: {r rr^ �. '.r.R Rr\.' �` :•. ? r.: ! =e a ,-.; S `"{� � rr r ✓ • ..... :-.x 1 { rr R s rti� R ^. + .. S ., ) ,.ti : - r 1"�R : ; R r � {r; � � _ a { �Y 1 �.�` '�..,,�?✓r.Rr11R rR;Ryr :'1�•.�R�. �ti• y .j.y�� t. I S � '� 3 =I i { f:�.. �f{, s R}1 `•t 1R' j rr1 R}•<: \i � iP T�< 3 1 1 1 .':�rj.r. V.r.^...,�.}1? 1. 1 1 t {° a rr by ✓- ✓ ?• R :s -% i, �- - { �: t�'�•t��`�'- .{.:[:vrti^Ci��rg1RR�•�? {R v :'ati r~r} {r S � �.-� l__`P r � Shy z�t�?r}.•;{r � - r.`sv •f .}.! 1. .._ i�. s � : o;:'` ;•7:Rr.�} 1"•� S1 R^.{ :.{' ..J s ! ! P d�'P�'^.r5`.:•{' r y r tvrvr ::r R. ?:h., _�::•^ ( f I •�' °=r• •s '".�:c� '4 .G:.,.:•.1 3 i�- ��� 1 :...� R 1 r r R r, ✓ .. R{ y .�.. :.. ��` - t rho r r .h �:�:�.�+•:W:ti:•,:✓.R�1 1 ri J' � { ...1-_ •.'aQpti„ �, ..��..R, �rl r" ^•- rR S .� - _" i I flbl?r r ti t y R1' •• ..{ ... 1 1 1'�P r y rJ J f # p` °�.a9 y ✓ ' 1 �, 4"".rr'4, rn1•`.'•R"1 yyR'�"':R l✓ y}, & I !\\ i „n� 2° 1 R� !. , t t. i{t �� t 15•y'y.`. 1J•�^" ,y h_•'S S1.11' S: w \t t ( Iv •:. f �IQ r y { � I ��.,_.-� t i. �:• `Rti• err -1` y r.r4"..R }`r 'ti.'• r F d { 4 =� , i � �� L+' �` `{�' r y � r_ ',—a SS f � � irr?: R r ti :e 1 R� 1:.r fir.: i.. I � „•'C '.O�ti ,r :-:ti^ J.. S, j ✓ `R,i :c: .r'r v R .: ti11Rti r 1 .1 i- 1 \ r "`�� ' -, S > %• \!-' p y �,rr `ir,` r✓i', '�:'4 r i { � �•1 � i { t,6 R R`+ti ',���"r ,r .r r•'� . {{= i i :rr.: y• r✓ r r r. : 1 `+,�.� ' P � °r dF1,r-. KM rrr 1R} - {'• ' i 7 { I < ✓ •:;�:; 9 r f € � R.. r r r r� R`R1R�''1 Sy"' 1 }'✓•} � = i — °' '' r~ : R.R r R R�•: ✓ I t J, r R ?�J1 Y� ! ! z i { ...;f '}t { r{ . = P : (. S �- tt •Y6'} }�} R/d ✓:� sy R Y R ! � i ':! r ✓ r r. I i� { S 1Cf r„ y` ?=' tir y y } � cF { .5-�E + _ .. �--r1.k� rr 11yr�r✓ .,r 11 1 f . N ?`✓ r r vr:°v { � ._q-.9-. ,'�{;.�'��` ti r r rR.1w{'r'�`{R,� +.tih ::r.} }.. 1 rR `a..- � } - 1 t-. r -Ct {� •C� �l1 y„ ✓ 1•:•°??1 !!„ ' R ".fr.; }R .'r ,'',• r w r r r.k /J 1•.r.. •^ ti. !}l �✓ R'.4,,}r4 J.}'�e,,y1. ti•:S'y yr-.1, ti+`.ti y';Lr..R R,,•S 7 -u... ....... r R 1L;;r1,r{y."R},. R +•.r�{'•i:i`ti •r.:;•}r ....,..:.v: °.,{R.R....R1 ;:sr.•.r•T.Rv •{? .r:r.v.R r$X11:�'+�•:ti .$ R{..✓.+..:.`�:::•:•�•�}}}rf S{R: �. fi:`._.�vy:• 5/7/2010 rt,r : .,fit�ti r rig.:ti{:4 rlv t:Yrti r r"} }f ` �f f t4 x t S4Sr t•'�tr rfi�� '��}rrr ,`rrry, rrr l r r r 'f r ; rr i s a rr v �'a r'�°}�,� ravf P 4 far f r�f : r•fir s�•;, Y *ti It•.. w r ;{'.�.� f t s trr',y:l�,Srr.a. SSy kt•rr':L f f1,;,�4 f ti r ar,:y,x �f.� 4"�' ;s,:� r.:- 1.�,. '^t v ' ' rrr:}r`r �a-.; .,,/,...r.."'•.Y"u'S_•.^ R`r.S r}4 1Vri'..:Y.°a.'.: r t •.•!,''J' Sr..r r, �`, r.t.r.• .S.,.r..;',. 1 t: t� �tr.J...� 1i�- �( — -� (-- '/.. r"",tt�:rr'`y'{. a''j l'• ro t;... }ti , � + �+ .,,� F--�•^� �" r 4- at{x rar r v�rf ✓,r h s! r,�: ` S �da'fN{;r }• ,� + _ Z ,.�i+ �.._, � ,TM4,� �'4a'� r �t,�r.}rh r r}tr r �' ,. f` ,,., t � �4 �" � � i `�, yct R y J ;'`: \:1"�'jik�,f{r�f r{'•f fx„t,.�?•�-.; ,�}r• 'rP,7•'F{� �^` R•���.r' `47rti� S� �����../ ,,� r'?..�t � � .�{rrlhr`+�r�}1fr ��; f`tr4` �`y *'rr` i '_�� ;rr v}�r •y{r {x '�? `°�'i :;,ter-* 1�� a.�{�} �vrt r r • ". :rr rr44}f,�' < r r,,�•x'N tr",S r r{x a}�r�,•}{'f� r a rrr � r rr. titrrr�,{r Pl�f f j _ ��:.. S`�i�4 t'••� '`?r��� r ` Y�a��frr'rrj r ' tint.• •r•r ,����� ram' r �r r;S�•'�,�} �^r` ^.-.r + t `'�d4'�i.'ti�.�C^r:r •j�'1Y.`.Y'a�'rr{4.r.{1r l'� rj. 5� V Y `�t SyS''• }r fir. ,?v r r�•y� ''�.4Y rr�r�rsrror}r'�i ��`�''` ti•• "��r. ti' ' ,�r. Vr�v.� �� ���Y{'},�r��fi*'rr r�f-.�..} r�.r 5�.r..} rrr rh,�{tir'�'•f :v r,�{+r k�"a� r n ; } t '• r g���rf fir{'{'^'��}�r"yyr�rr}Y r ,Y ` r?��• -s ���r �rrr� -, • ,��,,� �{•r, •� .pr�t�.f. r,,t,, •fit{ r •�•f�,�+S'rt r ti,r .�'` :�' ti ys f r }{ r ,??ti:� {r�}rrr; .�, {�a, ��#'f rtir'yrr'r'd':�r}x:✓��' ° F�,%""t4,�vr' f� rr?ri r r�, } "� r`.rx,r�` {+r' .{ r }} r.•'rh {�a,.�•.}rrtih�`y:,��titRx�r�},. rti `? �1i �gt �.l f�a j� x.. Y��t f�v��r� ,�r$rrh•rti{�{ti a;d{. ����:�}} �r a{ r �. x{� �,; � }Y�r.��" r ', t 'tir rrSr rr v4?irYy: r},y�}�rr'{r •}a'r t}`S.n,,ar f .4• �,- r,,t 4 r rat, : }r{vl�.�}a�1�rf f�h`}s1.�S+r rfh�t�h ,��r��+�r�t�rl a'r rr 4�f rf r •�vr r rrr'ti r r}�r}x t*~''r r.��rr.�J.��4rrr�� ;;, }�;..rt.�}}}';.4r,:}�S'r5kr•{y4i3t?:.;ri��,..t::.�rr,f,}.hX:,�i.'}�M}*�..: h..:.<f .ti�,�}Zf.:'�:��r{rr,`?f.,a'}�°.}.??,r:.}',.°•,ter :' WORKING GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES 2009 T _ ntinued • Conducted legal review of matching requirements • Recommended minimum size for regional health district • Population of 50,000 OR 155 square miles of land • 10 5/7/2010 • WORKING GROUP • Continued2009 ACTIVITIES • Proposed a formula for state regionalization incentive • Basic per capita payment. • Adjusted based on degree of regionalization, poverty and population density. • Practice Based Research Network Col. - Public Health Workforce Credentialing Donna Moultrup Belmont Health Director 11 5/7/2010 • GOALS /` CREDENTIALS • Provide qualified individuals, especially at the district level • Salaries usually. rise when credentials are required • Career ladders are more clear • Offer guidance to academic institutions preparing public health practitioners 0 - CAVEATS T . RECOMMENDED CREDENTIALS • No intention of "demoting" current staff • Credentials intended to upgrade the field; not to eliminate current staff • Understand credentials do not guarantee individual abilities • Positions will not be left vacant; employers will always have the option of choosing the best available candidate 12 5/7/2010 • RECOMMENDED CREDENTIALS -- -- • Head of a Regional District Advanced degree in public health or related field, 5 years of experience Et leadership certification (MA CHO) • Head of a Local Health Agency BA/BS with science concentration Et 5 years experience and RS/REHS 0 RECOMMENDED CREDENTIALS Continued • Environmental Health Professional BA/BS with science concentration &t RS/REHS or Associate's or BA/BS with a REHT credential • Governing Body Training such as MAHB Orientation course or Foundations course 13 5/7/2010 • : RECOMMENDED • - • i o Public Health Nurse {nrriV `i,Pli� III BS in Nursing required; current r MA license and 3 to 5 years public health or community health experience. 0 The Working Group's Practice Based Research Network Committee Justeen Hyde, PhD, Institute for Community Health 14 5/7/2010 • WHAT IS • PRACTICE-BASED NETWORK • • . LIC HEALTH? • Collaborations between public health practitioners and researchers • Identify, design, implement, evaluate, and disseminate solutions to real- world problems in public health practice. • Increase the production and translation of research to improve the quality of health care and health outcomes.- PRACTICE-BASED RESEARCH HEALTH J NETWORKS FOR PUBLIC • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funding in 2008 to be 1 of 5 PBRN sites in U.S. • 7 additional sites funded in 2008 15 1 1 sI - A"7'1�� BAD ® RR�r� 11� '1 �RK Call • proposals in October 2009a Demonstrate interest in exploring the 3 groups of "pilot communities" selected Pilot communities are expected to: i feasibilityof • • I Participate in evaluation of - process - Develop recommendations and guidelines i 16 S Cv+ AIL®T SITES F®R REi�IOI�CAL. �LARlII��NiG FOR �I�BLIC I�IEALTI� F 5/7/2010 • Addressing Common Concerns about Regionalization Geoff Wilkinson, Senior Policy Advisor Massachusetts Department of Public Health CONCERN I What works in one part of the state or for one set of communities won't work for all communities. Jill 17 5/7/2010 THE REALITY • One size does not fit all; different models allow communities to cluster in ways that .meet their needs. • Few communities face unique public health needs. • Concentrate on sameness not differences. • Regional needs may vary; neighboring communities best positioned to solve problems together. POSSIBLE MODELS • Comprehensive Services District: Formal agreement that all local public health services for two or more municipalities are carried out by one set of employees. • 18 5/7/2010 POSSIBLE • ontinued • Shared Services District: Formal agreement among two or more municipal boards of health to share some staff (e.g., public health nurse, animal control personnel, epidemiologist, health or environmental inspector) and/or services (e.g., mosquito control, immunizations, tobacco control, emergency preparedness, inspections, investigations). 0 CONCERN 2 When multiple communities share public health services, my town will lose control over public health �z�sron=m u es. 19 5/7/2010 • General law allows for shared services across communities. • It is possible to plan for shared services white maintaining local BOHs—it's happening now. • Regardless of the model, governance and legal policy making authority may be retained by municipal Boards of Health. • Option to delegate authority to a District Board CONCERN 3 My community will be forced to regionalize. 20 5/7/2010 a • Regionalization Working Group has always promoted core principle that communities need incentives not mandates to participate. • The Lt. Governor's Regionalization Advisory Committee (RAC) recommends voluntary regionalization of municipal services. • All RAC subcommittees are recommending incentives for regionalization. 0 ContinuedTHE REALITY • The Lt. Governor's Regionalization Advisory Committee endorsed an the Working Group's incentive formula to. -romot-e-�pi c—health regionalization. 21 5/7/2010 CONCERN 4 Regionalization is being driven by economic factors to cut costs without regard for quality of services. • Financial pressures may drive planning. • State funding needed for optimal progress; positive results possible using existing resources. e are being forced into the u ure— regionatization is becoming necessary across a range of municipal services. • Inclusive planning requires good working relationships in advance between municipal leaders and local public health officials. 22 5/7/2010 WORKING GRoup RECOMMENDATIONS FOR El EFFEcTivE REGIONAL PLANNING • Capitalize on retirements and staff vacancies. • Ensure that municipal leaders view local public health as a core part of government. • Engage municipal leaders, health directors and Board of Health members in planning from the beginning. 0 Recommended Steps to Regional Coordination Et Technical Assistance Sandra Martin, Health Agent, Town of Egremont and Emergency Pin�nne Berkshire Health Association Jack Vondras, Director of Public Health, 6loucestet Health Department 23 5/7/2010 WHY ARE WE EXPLORING • Improve our delivery of mandated/needed services • Ensure better health outcomes • Leverage our resources E KP t3UT E 0 "QUARANTINE I • ESSENTIALS FOR • Coommmm 1 . Legal Agreement with enough towns 2. Regional Oversight/Governing Council 3.- Fiscal Agent 24 5/7/2010 • BRING TO THE TABLE • LBOH members • Health Department/LBOH Staff/Agents • Town/City Administrators • Chief Elected Officials/Managers • Fiscal Agent • Technical Assistance as needed • REcomMENDEDSTEPSO fteioNAL COORDINATION 1. Assessment Wants and needs Resources, including taxes, fees, and "seed "money 2. Policy Priorities Strategies Fiscal m Legal Structure - Agreements ' t�k 3. Assurance Education and buy-in with community - Implementation and quality assurance 25 5/7/2010 • AsSESSMENT Os • What would your town/city like to achieve? Access to grants Better disease reporting and follow up Better health outcomes Shared inspectors Coordinated fees and standards Access to shared services like.bacteria lab for beach/pool testing, rabies/animal control, hoarding response, tobacco control 0 POLIcy HOMEWORK • What model do you think would work for your town? ✓ Shared Grants — Wellness, Drug Prevention, Tobacco, others. ✓ Shared services - Public Health Nurse, Solid Waste Management, Animal Control, others. ✓ Shared staff— Pool inspector, temporary food inspector, housing inspector, body art inspector, tanning salon inspector, camp inspector, others. ✓ Shared Health Department • 26 5/7/2010 AssURANCE HOMEWORK • What are your questions/concerns? ✓ Will it cost my town/city money? ✓ Will my LBOH lose authority? ✓ Will we lose capacity/services/jobs? ✓ Will it be too hard to implement? ✓ Who will do all this work? ✓ Will there be grant money? . ✓ What happens when we lose the grants? ✓ How do we start? 0 • Legal Structure: • Chapter 40—Inter-Municipal service agreements by Selectmen/Mayors/Managers • Chapter III —Authorization by Town Meeting/City Council and Board of Health • Partnerships with other agencies/organizations • Budgets • Seed money • Grants • Partnerships to leverage resources • Implementation • 27 5/7/2010 • TECHNICAL d AssISTANCE Two working meetings for communities exploring regionalization • Westfield — May 27 5:30-8:00pm • Waltham — June 2, 5:30-8:00pm Registration required: http://sites.google.com/site/regionalizationconference/ • Next Steps for 2010/2011 Cheryl Sbarra, J.D., Staff Attorney r�ssac-h t ��4ssoo1 --ion-0 if Health Boards 28 1 5/7/2010 NExir STEPS FOR 1 1 f • Office of Local Public Health • Credentialing • Tracking of public health regionalization • Address follow-up survey results Questions Et Answers r 29 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH 120 WASHINGTON STREET,4"'FLOOR TEL. (978) 741-1800 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAX(978)745-0343 MAYOR DGIu:ENBAUM@SALriM.COM DAVID GREENBAum ACTING HEALTH AGENT June 2,2010 Ashley Schmitz Kids Entertainment Group 4002 Lake Athens Court, Suite 100 Richmond,TX 77406 Dear Ms.Schmitz: Recently it was brought to the attention of the Salem Board of Health that you and your company, Kids Entertainment Group plan to operate a recreational camp for children at the Kemwood Country Club for the 2010 recreational camp season. To date the Salem Board of Health has not received an application for a permit to operate a recreational camp for children nor have we received any of the other required documentation to issue a permit to operate a recreational camp for children. • In accordance with 105 CMR 430.000 Minimum Sanitation and Safety Standard for Recreational Camps forChildren(Stet Sanitary Code,Chapter IV)and 105 CMR 430.631 Original License,an application for an original license to operate a summer camp for children must be received at least 90 prior to the opening date. Therefore,as you and your company have failed to file for an original license as required by 105 CMR 430.631 you are hereby ordered to cease and desist the operation of a recreational camp for children at the Kemwood Country Club. Should you be aggrieved by this Order,you have the right to request a hearing before the Board of Health. A request for such a hearing must be received in.writing in this office of the Board of Health within ten(10) days of receipt of this Order. At said hearing,you will be given the opportunity,to be heard and to present witness and documentary evidence as to why this Order should be modified or withdrawn. An attomey may represent you. Please also be informed that you have the right to inspect and obtain copies of all relevant inspection or investigation reports,orders,and other documentary information in the possession of this Board, and that any adverse party has the right to be present at the hearing. Orders of the Board of Health may be enforced by an application to Superior Court. Sincerely yo David G e aum Acting H all Agent Cc: Barbara Poremba, Board of Health Chair David Williams, MDPH • Kemwood Country Club CERTIFIED MAIL 7007 1490 0002 3077 4281 Regular Mail /II..- � t � 1 �_ �_ 1 1 1 / _��i _�=fit_ i�=��► i_=� mn-,. 1. .- :i/// ��•. • . •r • •� 11 ►r • ♦� ,f .�• ♦: :;:�..11�.11/.�:: .1!!l/::::.11!2!l ,1 I, •. 1 _Il � 1 I '• r •• :�•�111��hZl/: . �r•.�.i.i■rf��•�.r.rfrf��•r.rrr.rf��•�.I.rf�f♦♦•,.r.rf�♦��fr.rrr.l•��♦ �. \ ` , �Z12►I�.::.�Z12111.:•:.�11211/ 1I, 1I, I IIi►t,�• TH OF M `•, I'll O LY �V/ ►� �� \ 1111, #14 VA O� .;ago. fug) '/'I'����•i �Nr OF PUBS' '�+1►II'I H� 11►n:�: �J�) of ap p 41111 The M ssachusetts Department of Public Health "''''''1�1 tanks the Salem Board of Health for %,VV41'� articipa ing in and managing immunization clinics ��11'►'�':% during the 2009-2010 H1N1 .res onse ►'► �� p •. ..� 11►..:% � 111 �ll',►� April, 2010 John Auerbach,Commissioner �I�1111`h� Department of Public Health c.•n .;.-.•------ :, •��\�\�:. 1��L��.��..� 1♦jiL•�.!�..� I�1♦I1�l�•t *_.�►iJ�j♦I�t�•��:w...�.�_1i�j♦Ij�ti�•�[.r...... ♦_L .......�_li�1I1�ti��..-..•.�_1i�ij��_L��-..-..•.�!i�lI��L���.:.::.'��_1� _L�•�5�.:�.::.��•_1���♦j��L�����.`.�.:.:.��_1��1♦j1�_L�•��t..:�.::".:�f►1����j��•t.•:11�..7 f►1���♦1;�L��I :�.:� . t .. �.►�%_1.t�L�t�•Z•: ,Lw RI� t♦4 i / .0I The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Department of Public Health 250 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02108-4619 DEVAL L.PATRICK GOVERNOR TIMOTHY P.MURRAY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR JUDYANN BIGBY,MD SECRETARY JOHN AUERBACH COMMISSIONER May 19, 2010 Dear Salem Board of Health: Enclosed is a certificate from John Auerbach, Massachusetts Commissioner of Public Health, thanking your Board of Health for your contribution to the H1N1 mass vaccination campaign of 2009-2010 Massachusetts achieved one of the highest HIN1 vaccination rates in the country for both adults and children, due in large part to tom;support.of our public health partners, including local Boards of Health. At the March 22, 2010 "H1N1 LessonsiL eaww Sur i-e'the Bbar& of Health were lauded as Public Health Heroes. This certi€kabe is,meant to further affirm the Department's appreciation for your hard work and sustained efforts to protect the public's health during the H1N1 response. Thank you for your support of a healthier Massachusetts. Sincerely, Michael Coughlin, MS _ Local-Public-Health-Manager —--- Bureau of Emergency Preparedness MDPH 250 Washington St. Boston, MA 02108 617 624-5091 617 2 79-5639-cell 617 624-558 7 fax CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF HEALTH • MEETING MINUTES May 12, 2010 DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Dr. Barbara Poremba, Chairperson, Kemith LeBlanc, Martin Fair, Marc Salinas, &Gayle Sullivan OTHERS PRESENT: David Greenbaum, Acting Health Agent, Thomas Furey, Councilor Liaison& Tracy Giarla, Public Health Nurse MEMBERS EXCUSED: Dr. Larissa Lucas TOPIC DISCUSSION/ACTION 1. Call to Order Meeting called to order by Dr. Poremba, Chair, at 7:05pm. 2. Minutes of Last Meeting Unanimously approved (April 13, 2010) 3. Chairperson Announcements None presented 4. Monthly Reports-Updates A. Administrative Presented and approved (see attached). B. Public Health Nurse Presented and approved (see attached). • MAVEN (MA Virtual Electronic Network) is being introduced to Public Health Nurses for tracking and surveillance of communicable disease cases. Expired H1Nlvaccine: CDC will soon announce a drop-off site for disposal of expired vaccines C. Acting Health Agent Presented and approved (see attached). Farmers Market starts in June. Household Hazardous Waste Day(HWD) is the 15t Saturday in October. Cape Ann NS Community Action: state grants are being given to regions to provide additional public health information to the communities. They are requesting a volunteer from the board in each city/town to participate in the decision making. Gayle Sullivan volunteers. D. City Council Liaison Councilor Liaison Thomas Furey noted that BOH draft minutes where not being posted on the website prior to the next meeting. He requested that the board kindly post them within one week after the meeting. Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum provided the members of the board with a copy of the Salem code which states that preparation of meeting minutes shallll be complete within one • week of the end of the meeting and posted on the city website within 48 hours after the minutes have been prepared (see attached). Dr. Poremba and other board members stated they were unaware of this city ordinance and assumed that this would be the responsibility of the clerk. Both the clerk and acting health agent were also unaware of this requirement. As there had been a change in the clerk position, it appeared that this duty had not been communicated to the new clerk. Dr. Poremba stated that getting the transcribed minutes from the clerk in a timely manner has been an issue and that the board has requested that draft minutes be completed within one week of the meeting; however this has not been consistent. When the dra� minutes are received by Dr. Poremba, they are reviewed for spellin grammar, clarity and accuracy and on average, are finalized within 48 hours. Given that the minutes are not received by the Chair in less than a one week time period, Dr. Poremba is unable to agree that the minutes will be finalized within one week. However, she requests that the clerk complete the draft as soon as possible after the meeting. She will try to review within 48 hours and return the finalized draft to the Clerk. It will then be the responsibility of the Acting Health Agent to assure that these draft minutes are posted online within 48 hours. Councilor Furey appreciates this plan and finds it acceptable. 5. New Business A. O'Neal's Pub Open Air Cafe Ronny Brogan, owner requests a variance from the board to open the Dining Variance street front windows, without screens, until 9pm. A full door will be added to the kitchen. D. Greenbaum stated that the board required the Tavern of the Square to have an air curtain at the kitchen door and recommended that this as well as all other requirement be applied to this establishment for consistency. The variance given to the Tavern on the Square was submitted into the record (see attached). Marc Salinas cautions that since this establishment has a DJ at time* and other restaurants may apply for this variance, that the board should be aware that noise levels may be an issue in the future. He is aware that this will not be the case for O'Neil's as the variance to be in effect only until 9pm. Motion to approve the application, subject to the conditions set forth by the variance by M. Salinas, 2nd G. Sullivan. 4 in favor, none opposed (chairperson declines to vote per usual custom). Motion carries. B. BVS Corporation - 15 & 16 Brian Sullivan &John Boldisaro presenting. Scotia Street This property had an asbestos problem prior to the current owners purchase of the property in Feb of 2008. The site has since been cleaned up and there is an LSP for the property on file at the Board of Health. The site is 20,000 square feet and has been divided into 2 lots each with proposed a 3 bedroom single family home. The fire department is aware that trucks will not be able to turn around however that has always been the case on this street. The site plan will alleviate water drainage problems for neighbors by adding trees and landscaping and the pitching the grade from driveways to stone Motioned to approve the site plan with conditions (excluding#18� by M. Salinas, 2nd G-Sullivan. 4 in favor, 0 opposed (chair declines to vote as per usual custom) Motion carries. 6. Miscellaneous Items A. High Rock LLC comments T.0 Riley Gogin&Dr. Joan Zabcar request that the board allow comments regarding High Rock LLC and the proposed Community • Life Center. Their appeal is that they were unaware that the project was being reviewed by the board last month and believe that they had new information regarding potential health issues that should be presented to the board in a public hearing. Dr. Poremba informed them that the project was listed on the agenda, posted in City Hall as required and reviewed in an open meeting format last month. At that time, the board approved the project with conditions. However, since they contend that they have new health related information, the board agrees to recognize T.0 Riley Gogin& Dr. Zabcar to make comments with the understanding that the project has been approved and that this new information may not impact the disposition of the project. Dr. Joan Zabcar, 96 Phelps Street, stated that a letter regarding the Sylvania site on the corner of Boston and Bridge Streets was sent from Patricia Donahue of the northeast section of DEP to the board, the mayor and the city councilors. She stated that this was sent as an email in March of 2009. The content of this letter refers to the risk characterization that no children can be on this site for greater than 4 hours at a time secondary to potential toxins linked to childhood leukemia. Dr. Poremba stated that she has never received such a letter as this was prior to her election as chairperson. She asked both the clerk and the acting health agent if they were aware of such an email and both were uncertain. • Dr. Zabcar also stated that Frank Vetere, Licensed Site Professional, was not present at our meeting last month when the board approved the High Rock LLC site. She believes that due to the risk characterization, a new AUL should be done on the property. T.C. Riley also requested to read and submit a letter from Joan Sweeney dated March 2, 2010 (see attached). Dr. Poremba stated that the letter from J. Sweeney discussed traffic and flood issues which were already addressed with the applicant. It had no mention of child health concerns. It was also her understanding that any programs where children will be on this property will not be for more than brief periods. Dr. Zabcar stated that she was aware of a program that teaches sign language to infants which would be held on the property. Dr. Poremba made the following requests: • that Dr. Zabcar send David Greenbaum, Acting Health Agent, the information she has so that the board may consider reviewing them; • that the clerk and acting health agent investigate if any letter from Patricia Donahue was sent to the board; • that D. Greenbaum contact Park and Recreation regarding • what programs they plan to have at the new center that will involve infants and children and for what time periods; • that D. Greenbaum on behalf of the board, consult with Beth Rennard for legal advice in addressing this situation; Dr. Poremba again reminded all that the project has already been approved and therefore this new information may not impact the disposition. Board members had some later discussion re: concerns in allowing T.C. Riley&Dr. Zebcar to speak without having been on the agenda. D. Greenbaum stated that Dr. Joan Zabcar was in last week about the senior center project and had information that he thought was going to be presented before the board tonight. However, neither the chair• nor any of the board members were aware of this. M. Salinas stated that a person must request to be recognized and that it is up to the chair whether or not they are going to be heard. The only time the public is permitted to speak is at a public hearing. Dr. Poremba stated that she felt a bit ambushed by the residents who had obviously had a discussion prior to the meeting with the acting health agent and clerk. Given their claims and possible omission of documents, she allowed them to speak to clarify their issues. M. Salinas thinks we need to find a nice balance between maintaining informality when somebody wants to bring something up to the board without being on the agenda. If people are out of order then the chair should use the gavel to stop people from ambushing the board. However, other members stated that they were interested in what the residents had to say. M. Salinas agrees about them being heard, stating "You don't want them going away saying that the board didn't even recognize them". He stated he will always support the chairs decision. B. Regionalization Discussion regarding teleconference yesterday hosted by BU School of PH and DPH. Dr. Poremba and David Gre enbaum participated. Both thought the teleconference was interesting and informative. A • few key points were: • There are a variety of models for regionalization, collaboration or partnerships; • State grants for this would require community groups of greater than 50,000 people or 155 square miles. • Regionalizing will not necessarily result in a cost savings but rather result ways to provide better public health services. • The goal is to build up public health as a core function and decrease disparities among communities. • Improving the qualifications and credentials of public health P g q staff and board of health members will be paramount; however, at this time this is no clear compensation plan for of p the current work force. — ----+—It appears-that-any-regionalization-process-would-take-2--3---- years minimum. • Regionalization will not be forced by the state. • Salem already has some collaboration with other communities such as nursing, emergency preparedness and tobacco control; these may be opportunities for more formal partnerships. Dr. Poremba requests that D. Greenbaum forward the slide presentation from the online conference to all members. • The DPH will be hosting a working meeting on June 2 from 5:30- 8:00 PM in Waltham to discuss local public health regionalization with municipal leaders and health officials from a variety of communities. The board requests that D. Greenbaum extend invitations to the Mayor and City Councilors. r �s Dr. Poremba, G. Sullivan, D. Greenbaum and Tracy Giarla will plan to attend; M. Salinas and M. Fair will also if they are able. M. Fair notes that there has been no clear interest in regionalization with either Peabody or Swampscott and it has been about 1 %2 years since Salem has had a permanent Health Agent. What direction should the board take at this time? Dr Poremba recommends that after the June 2nd meeting, the board discuss what action should be taken this at the next board meeting. All agree to place the topic to the agenda for the June meeting. C. Transfer Station Appeal Discussion re: transfer station appeal and legal representation. Should the board make an inquiry about representation for the BOH on the transfer station appeal? Should the city solicitor be representing the BOH when the city is a co-applicant? Is this a conflict of interest since the city is a co-applicant? Should the BOH consult the ethics commission on this? Dr. Poremba recommends that the BOH write a formal letter to Beth Rennard about this concern. All agree. Letter to be written will contain: After a discussion regarding the transfer station appeal the Board • of Health requests that the city provide the board with independent counsel due to a potential conflict of interest. D. Protocol M. Salinas questions the protocol regarding motions. Expresses concern that there be clarity in minutes and records when there is a motion on the table. States "we are going to be put under a lot of scrutiny for what happened on the transfer station. You never know if one of these issues will turn into a major problem, for example letting people speak about the senior center project without being on the agenda". He has a real problem with the site project stating that he started to make a motion, never fully articulated the motion and as far as he is concerned, never made a motion on that. He requested to hear what the motion was from the Clerk's notes. The Clerk read from her recording that "Atty. Salinas motioned to approve the site plan with conditions excluding#18". Dr. Poremba clarifies that M. Salinas did make a motion and it was seconded. There was a discussion and the motion was brought forward again and approved by the board. 8. MEETING ADJOURNED Motion to adjourn 9:50 PM orectfully submitted, Heather Lyons Clerk of the Board Next regularly scheduled meeting is June 8, 2010 at 7pm, City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Sg Room 311 CITY OF SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS • BOARD OF HEALTH 120 WASHINGTON STREET,4"'FLOOR TEL. (978)741-1800 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL FAx(978)745-0343 MAYOR DGREF..,NBAUM@SALEM.COM -DAVID GREENBAUM Public Health Nurse Report AcTI.NG HEALTH AGENT May 2010 Activities Disease Prevention In contact with North Shore Pulmonary Clinic regarding active cases and case contacts. • Investigated communicable disease cases and reported to the MDPH. Meetings/Clinics • DOT provided weekly for an active TB case. • • Attended the NSCAEP meeting held at the Peabody DPW. • Attended North Shore Elder Services Hoarding Task Force Meeting. • Attended the quarterly North Shore Pulmonary Clinic TB meeting held at the North Shore Pulmonary Clinic. • Inspected the Sacred Harp Micro pigmentation station at the Sacred Harp. Permit issued for"Micro pigmentation Only." • Attended North Shore Head Start Health Advisory Committee meeting in Peabody. Blood Pressure Clinics offered at the Salem Fire Headquarters on May 5 and • Attended a Regional Health Meeting in Gloucester. H1 N1 updates and presentation regarding the Prescription Drug take back program. Information about this program was discussed with Salem Police Chief Paul Tucker. Attended the Annual Immunization Conference held at Tewksbury Hospital. • . Invited to speak at Salem State College Life Long Learning Institute at 10 Federal Street. David and I jointly presented a power point on Public Health and Senior Food Safety. CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF HEALTH 120 WASHINGTON STREET,4"FLOOR TEL. (978) 741-1800 KIMBERLEY DIUSCOLL FAX(978)745-0343 MAYOR DGREENBAUM(@SALCM.COM DAVID GREENmum ACTING HEALTH AGENT MONTHLY REPORT OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES MARCH 2O10 DISEASE NEW CARRY OVER DISCHARGED REPORTED CAMPYLOBACTER 0 0 0 0 HERB 0 0 0 0 HINT 0 0 0 0 INVASIVE GAS 0 0 0 Q • LYME 0 0 0 0 SALMONELLA 2 0 2 2 TUBERCULOSIS 1 O 0 1 VARICELLA 1 0 1 1 SALMONELLA: 35 Y/O FEMALE. NON FFOODHANDLER. LIVES ALONE. 27 Y/O MALE. FOOD HANDLER. MD NOTIFIED. MANAGER OF ESTABLISHMENT NOTIFIED. EXCLUDED FROM WORK UNTIL I NEGATIVE STOOL SENT TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH. 1 TB CASE COMPLETED 6 MONTHS OF THERAPY. • • • • Administration Monthly Report May-10 Burial Permits @$25.00 $1,200.00 Permits $3,760.00 Certificate of Fitness@$50.00 $3,900.00 Copies $0.00 Fines= $0.00 Total Monies Collected = $8,860.00 Animal Bites Reported= 0 Annual Budget Expended Available Balance Salary/Longevity $356,823.00 $260,009.05 $91,588.55 Annual Budget Non-Personnel $21,200.00 $10,041.96 $5,932.64 I Acting Health Agent Report May 2010 May 3,2010 • Conducted a pre-operation inspection of the Forest River snack bar for the summer food program. May 4,2010 • Attended the NS Regional Hoarding task force meeting at North Shore Elder Services. • Conducted an opening inspection of the new food service establishment Coven. • Conducted a pre-operation inspection of the new micro-pigmentation operation at Sacred Harp Tattoo. May 2010 • Conducted an opening inspection of the new food service establishment Greenland Cafe. May 10, 2010 • Participated in the Public Health Regionalization teleconference and webinar. May 13,2010 • Conducted an opening inspection of the new food service establishment Rizzo's Roast beef and Pizza May 17,2010 • • Conducted a plan review for the proposed new Dunkin Donuts at Hess gas. May 18,2010 • Conducted an inspection of the lodging house at 89 Congress Street. • Conducted an inspection of the lodging house at 6 Munroe Street. • Conducted an inspection of the lodging house at 128 Bridge Street. May 19, 2010 • Attended the Senior Staff meeting in the Mayors Office • Attended a meeting of the North Shore Tobacco Control Collaborative. May 20, 2010 • Attended the South Salem Neighborhood Association meeting. May 24, 2010 • Conducted an opening inspection of the swimming pool at Hawthorne Commons. • Conducted an opening inspection of the swimming pool at Princeton Crossing. _ May 27, 2010 • Investigated a rodent complaint on Hathorne Street. • Conducted a trash inspection at 54 Margin Street. Order issued. • Attended the Monthly meeting of the NS/CA Emergency Preparedness Coalition in Peabody May 28, 2010 • Conducted a public health presentation for the Salem State College Explorers Lifelong • Learning Institute. Children's programs that are currently offered and will be offered at the Senior Center BABY SIGNS PLAY CLASSES Date: Saturdays, Oct. 17 to Nov. 21, Feb. 6 to March 20 (no class on Feb. 20), May 1 to June 12 (no class May 29) Time: 9 to 10 a.m. for beginners 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. for intermediates TUMBLEWEEDS Ages: 2-3 years Date: Thursdays for eight weeks. April 29 to June 17; Sept. 9 to Oct. 28, Nov. 12 to Jan. 21 (no class Nov. 26, Dec. 24 & Dec. 31), Feb. 4 to April 1 (no class Feb. 18), Time: 9 to 9:45 a.m. TUMBLE ROLLERS Age: 3-5 years Date: Thursdays for eight weeks. April 29 to June 17; Sept. 9 to Oct. 28, Nov. 12 to Jan. 21 (no class Nov. 26, Dec. 24 & Dec. 31), Feb. 4 to April 1 (no class Feb. 18) Time: 10 to 10:45 a.m. ITSY BITSY YOGA Age: 21 months-4 years Date: Mondays, June 21 to Aug. 2 (no class July 5), Oct. 19 to Nov. 23 • Time: 9 to 9:45 a.m. BABYSITTING COURSE Age: 12-15 years Date: Tuesday, April 20, Tuesday, February 16 Time: 9 a.m. to noon KNITTING WITH SENIORS Age: 6-12 years Date: April 20-23 (school vacation week), Tuesday-Friday, February 16 to 19 Time: 10 to 11:30 a.m. MYSTERIOUS MAYANS Age: 6-11 years Date: Thursdays, April 1, 8, 15, 22 &29 Time: 3:30 to 5 p.m. _ HIP-HOP DANCE LESSONS Age: 6-12 years Date: Tuesdays, starting July 6, for 6 weeks Time: 6 to 7 p.m. for 6-to 8-year-olds; 7 to 8 p.m. for 9-to 12-year-olds. BOYS& GIRLS HIP HOP Ages: 6-12 years Date: TBD, Please call in October Time: 5-6 p.m. • ROCKIN' ROMANS Age: 6-10 years Date: Thursdays, Oct. 29 to Dec. 17 (no class Nov. 26) Time: 3:30-5 p.m. BACK TO THE FUTURE Age: 6-10 years Date: Thursdays, Jan. 14 to Feb. 25(no class Feb. 18) Time: 3:30-5 p.m. HEAT IT UP! VACATION PROGRAM Age: 6-10 years Date: Tuesday through Friday, Feb. 16 to 19 Time: 9 a.m. to noon CHESS Age: Kindergarten-grade 5 Date: Tuesdays, Feb. 23 to March 16 Time: 6-7 p.m. CHESS TOURNAMENT Age: Kindergarten-grade 5 Date: Saturday, March 20 Time: 9 a.m. TEEN YOGA Age: 11-15 years Date: Thursdays, Oct. 22 to Nov. 12 Time: 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. RUBBER STAMPING Age: 10-15 years Date: Tuesday, April 20 Time: noon to 1:45 p.m. MAKE YOUR OWN IPOD HOLDER Age: 8-14 years Date: Wednesday, April 21 Time: 10 a.m. to noon PAPER DOLL WORKSHOP Age: 6-12 years Date: Thursday, April 22 Time: 10 a.m. to noon • Children's programs that are currently offered and will be offered at the Senior Center BABY SIGNS PLAY CLASSES Date: Saturdays, Oct. 17 to Nov. 21, Feb. 6 to March 20 (no class on Feb. 20), May 1 to June 12 (no class May 29) Time: 9 to 10 a.m. for beginners 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. for intermediates TUMBLEWEEDS Ages: 2-3 years Date: Thursdays for eight weeks. April 29 to June 17; Sept. 9 to Oct. 28, Nov. 12 to Jan. 21 (no class Nov. 26, Dec. 24 & Dec. 31), Feb. 4 to April 1 (no class Feb. 18), Time: 9 to 9:45 a.m. TUMBLE ROLLERS Age: 3-5 years Date: Thursdays for eight weeks. April 29 to June 17; Sept. 9 to Oct. 28, Nov. 12 to Jan. 21 (no class Nov. 26, Dec. 24 & Dec. 31), Feb. 4 to April 1 (no class Feb. 18) Time: 10 to 10:45 a.m. ITSY BITSY YOGA Age: 21 months-4 years Date: Mondays, June 21 to Aug. 2 (no class July 5), Oct. 19 to Nov. 23 Time: 9 to 9:45 a.m. • BABYSITTING COURSE Age: 12-15 years Date: Tuesday, April 20, Tuesday, February 16 Time: 9 a.m. to noon KNITTING WITH SENIORS Age: 6-12 years Date: April 20-23 (school vacation week), Tuesday-Friday, February 16 to 19 Time: 10 to 11:30 a.m. MYSTERIOUS MAYANS Age: 6-11 years Date: Thursdays, April 1, 8, 15, 22 &29 Time: 3:30 to 5 p.m. HIP-HOP DANCE LESSONS Age: 6-12 years Date: Tuesdays, starting July 6, for 6 weeks Time: 6 to 7 p.m. for 6-to 8-year-olds; 7 to 8 p.m. for 9-to 12-year-olds. BOYS&GIRLS HIP HOP Ages: 6-12 years Date: TBD, Please call in October Time: 5-6 p.m. • ROCKIN' ROMANS Age: 6-10 years Date: Thursdays, Oct. 29 to Dec. 17 (no class Nov. 26) Time: 3:30-5 p.m. BACK TO THE FUTURE Age: 6-10 years Date: Thursdays, Jan. 14 to Feb. 25 (no class Feb. 18) Time: 3:30-5 p.m. HEAT IT UP!VACATION PROGRAM Age: 6-10 years Date: Tuesday through Friday, Feb. 16 to 19 Time: 9 a.m. to noon CHESS Age: Kindergarten-grade 5 Date: Tuesdays, Feb. 23 to March 16 Time: 6-7 p.m. CHESS TOURNAMENT Age: Kindergarten-grade 5 Date: Saturday, March 20 Time: 9 a.m. TEEN YOGA Age: 11-15 years • Date: Thursdays, Oct. 22 to Nov. 12 Time: 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. RUBBER STAMPING Age: 10-15 years Date: Tuesday, April 20 Time: noon to 1:45 p.m. MAKE YOUR OWN IPOD HOLDER Age: 8-14 years Date: Wednesday, April 21 Time: 10 a.m. to noon PAPER DOLL WORKSHOP Age: 6-12 years Date: Thursday, April 22 Time: 10 a.m. to noon 0 • Chairperson's Announcements June 2010 I. Review of Meeting Procedures & Protocols A. Informal Procedure in Small Boards The rules for small boards,however,are different. Refer to RONR IOth ed p.470-471,: "In a board meeting where there are not more than about a dozen members present,some of the formality that is necessary in a large assembly would hinder business." The rules for meetings of small boards are different from the rules that govern other assemblies, in the following ways: • Board members do not have to stand or be recognized by the chair in order to speak or make motions. • Motions need not be seconded(they may be but are not required). • A board member may speak any number of times on a question(not just two),and motions to close or limit debate are generally not permitted. • A motion does not have to be pending in order to discuss a subject informally. • If a proposal is clear to those in attendance,a vote can be taken without a motion being made. • • Votes can be taken initially by a show of hands(except in the case of elections where vote should be by ballot). • It is not necessary for the chairman to rise when putting a question to a vote. • The chairman can enter debate without rising or relinquishing the chair. • Subject to a rule or custom of the particular board,the chairman usually can make motions and vote without the limitations of larger assemblies where the chairman should maintain an appearance of impartiality. However, if at any time,a lack of order prevents the business of the board from being accomplished,the chair may return to formal rules of conducting a meeting and will advise the members that parliamentary rules of order are in place(i.e.being recognized by the chairperson before speaking,observing formal rules of debate,stating a question before taking a vote). B. Procedure of Unanimous Consent "Unanimous consent enables a motion to be adopted or some action to be taken without the necessity of having the chair state the question on a motion and put the motion to a vote. It even permits taking action without the formality of a motion being made at all. The chair simply asks the assembly if there is any objection to taking the desired action,and if no member then objects, the chair declares that the action has been agreed to." C. Minutes of Meetings The Open Meeting Law(as well as the Public Records Law, G.L.c. 66, §5A)requires every governmental body to maintain accurate minutes of all its meetings. At a minimum,minutes must set forth the date,time, • and place of the meeting,the identity of the members present or absent, and all"action taken." The District Attorney has interpreted the term"action taken" to include not only votes and other formal decisions made at a meeting,but also discussion or consideration of issues for which no vote is taken or l final determination is made.12 It would be sound practice to also include in the minutes a summary of each • discussion held at the meeting. However,a verbatim record of each discussion is not required. See G.L. c. 66, § 5A. If votes are taken at a meeting,the minutes must record each vote exactly as it occurred. If a governmental body keeps in mind that minutes are meant to serve as a record of what was done at a meeting and not necessarily all that was said, full compliance with the Open Meeting Law's record keeping requirements will likely be assured. http://www.mass.gov/Cagoldocs/Government/­openmtqauide.odf D. Meeting & Deliberation: clarification of terms "Meeting",any corporal convening and deliberation of a governmental body for which a quorum is required in order to make a decision at which any public business or public policy matter over which the governmental body has supervision,control,jurisdiction or advisory power is discussed or considered;but shall not include any on-site inspection of any project or program." Please keep in mind,though,that during the on-site inspection,there cannot be any deliberation which is defined as: "Deliberation",a verbal exchange between a quorum of members of a governmental body attempting to arrive at a decision on any public business within its jurisdiction. Please note that Chapter 28 of the Acts of 2009, to take effect next July,further define these terms: "Deliberation",an oral or written communication through any medium, including electronic mail, between or among a quorum of a public body on any public business within its jurisdiction;provided, however,that"deliberation" shall not include the distribution of a meeting agenda,scheduling information or distribution of other procedural meeting or the distribution of reports or documents that . may be discussed at a meeting,provided that no opinion of a member is expressed. II. Expectations of Acting Health Agent to promote better communication and to facilitate conducting the business of the board. A. Acting Health Agent Report: Report is to be a written synopsis of activities and outcomes rather than a list of dated activities. These may include: • Key points from informational meetings such as those with the Mayor and NSCA Emergency Preparedness Coalition. • Information on pending and/or future public health activities/plans/concerns • All significant communication or complaints from residents • Any inquiries or reports in or from the media • Any other public health information of which the board should be made aware B. Submission of Reports • Assure that all reports/updates will be submitted in writing and sent out to board members and council liaison prior to the monthly meeting. • These must be emailed and postmarked no later than the Wednesday before so that members will have adequate time for review. • Any information received after this will be submitted in writing and emailed as attachments to • all members prior to the meeting. r r • • All reports will be available for approval and submission into the official record to increase clarity and improve accuracy. • Additional copies of all documents necessary for the meeting will be made available for board members who may inadvertently not have them. C. Facilitating conduct and communication of BOH meetings • Review of draft minutes for spelling,grammar,accuracy and clarity prior to submitting to Chair for approval. • Assuring that all board of health minutes and attachments are maintained in an official binder which will be available at all board meetings • Monthly updating of website including draft minutes and announcements D. Project Awaiting Comments from the Board • Review all projects on the agenda awaiting comments from the Board • Assure that all documents are provided to the board members and that the applicants are adequately instructed in the protocols for presentation before the board. E. Aiding Board Members in Maintaining their Responsibilities • Notify all board members and staff regarding mandatory biannual ethics online training. • Maintain documentation that all board members and staff have completed biannual ethics online training III. Expectations of Board Members to facilitate conducting the business of the board. • Review of all documents prior to the scheduled meeting as well as all minutes of meetings for which you were unable to attend. • Communication with Chair and Acting Health Agent if unable to make a meeting to assure that a quorum is available. • Review,understand and comply with all protocols provided by the Chair • Completion of the Ethics Commission biannual online training program as required by the State Conflict of Interest Law. This is available @ http://db.state.ma.us/ethics/quiz MEthics/index.asp • Provide the Acting Health Agent with a certificate of completion Ethics requirement. • Completion of a training program by MA Association of Public Health Boards • Maintain respectful communication among all members Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC113 ` • ACTIVITY$USE LIMITATION (AUL)TRANSMITTAL FORM Release Tracking Number • xn Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1056& 40.1070-40.1084(Subpart J) A- DISP SPJ, Lx=.,,": '+ �Y 3 t k cu .^. ; ;•.- ws.Githkrti Y'v? 4 b } '^3.. ' a'ug�,� C :H 1. Disposal Site Name: __x�r: sr ,.��� 4mtrn >_s�. - vc '�a.aW. .�.,_. . ? �Nu� � x�� +•�'4 2- Street Address ' . �3�.fiat ;f " �°_:h��r 3. Cityffown. N �r, 4. ZIP Code: 0 5- Check here if a Tier Classification Submittal has been provided to DEP for this disposal site. a. Tier IA b. Tier 1 B n c. Tier IC Q d. Tier 2 6.ff a Tier i Permit has been issued,provide Permit Number: #i THIS FORM IS BRIG LOW M. (check one) 0 1. Submit a certified copy of a Notice of Activity and Use Lknitatiort,Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1074. Q 2. Submit an Evaluation of Ganges in Land UsesfActivitles and/or Site conditions after a Response Action dome Statement has been filed pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1080. • Q 3: Submit a certified copy of an Amended Notice of Ac&AW and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1081 • 4- Submit a certified copy of a Partial Termination of a Notice of Activity and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(3). Q 5- Submit a certified copy of a Termination of a Notice of Activity and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(1)(d). Q 6. Submit a certified copy of a Grant of Entironmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1071. 7. Submit a certified copy of an Amendment of a Grant of Environmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1081(3). 8- Submit a certified copy of a Partial Release of a Grant of Environmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(2). ® 9. Submit a certified copy of a Release of a Grant of Emrironmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(1 xc). 10. Subn it a certified copy of a confirmatory Activity and Use Limitation,pursuant to 410 CMR 40.1085(4). 11. Provide Additional RTNs: FD a. Check here if this AUL Submittal covers additi Release Tracking Numbers(RTNs). b. Provide the additional Release Tracking Number(s) a _ ❑ _ covered by this AUL Submittal. (All sections of this transmittal form mush be filled out unless otherwise noted above. BWSC113A is required for all submittals listed above) Revised:06/27/2003 Page 1 of 4 41 A Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC113 ACTIVITY&USE LIMITATION (AUL)TRANSMITTAL FORM Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1056& 40.1070-40.1084(Subpart J) =h � HIM`- a AUL INFORMATION; 1. Document(per Section B)Recording and/or Registration Information: a. Name of Registry of Deeds and/or Land Registration Office: b_ Book and Page Number and/or Document Numbe ( r. c. Date of recording and/or registration: 1 nvn/dd/vvw 2_ Is the address of the property subject to AUL different from the disposal site address listed above? ❑ a_ No ❑ b. Yes If yes,then fill out address section below. 3_ Street Address: 4_ Cityfrown: 5. ZIP Code. D. PERSON SLITTING AUL TRANSMRTAL FORM: 1. Check all that c. change in the person • apply ❑ a_change in contact name ❑ b.change of address ❑ undertaking response actions 2. Name of Organization: JOSRAM SYLVANIA PRODUCTS INC 3. Contact First Name: 4.Last Name: 5_ Street 6.Title: 7. City/Tanrn: 8. State: 9. ZIP Code: 10. Telephone: �— 11.Ext: 12. FAX 13_ Is the person described in this section the owner of the property? ® a. Yes [� b_ No,if checked then Section G must be filled out by at least one owner. ❑ c. Check here if providing names and addresses of any additional owners in an attachment. E. RB AT10NSH1IP TO DISPOSAL.SITE OF PERSON SUBI4>ITTING AUL TRANS11011TTAL FOR IL-L- (check one) 1. RP or PRP a. Owner ❑ b. Operator ❑ c. Generator ❑I d. Transporter e. Other RP or PRP Specify.. ❑ 2. Fiduciary,Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status(as defined by M.G.L.c.21E,S.2) ❑ 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.50)) , ❑ 4. Any Other Person Submitting AUL Specify: • Revised:06/27/2003 Page 2 of 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection i Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC113 i ACTIVITY&• USE LIMITATION(AUL)l TRANSMITTAL FORM g Number Release Tracking Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1056& 40.1070-40.1084(Subpart J) F.RECUR ATTACHIY1BU AND SUBM"ALS.- ❑ 1- Check here to certify that notice of the Proposed Activity and Use Limitation(AUL) was given to all record-interest holders, if any,in a000rdan,oe with 310 CMR 40.1074(1)(e),via ceded mail u, a- Check here if there were no record interest holders. b. Date of certified mailing: ❑ c_ Check here to mr�/ddlyyyy certify that names and addresses of all record holders notified is attached- 2. Check here to cerlify terminating the AU that within 30 days of recording and/or negisterirKJ the AUL,including amending,releasing or cePY the AUL was/will be provided to the Chief Municipal Officer,the Board of Health,the Zoning Official,and the Building Code Enforcement Official in the commund ies)where the the Use Limitation is located Property subject to such Activity and ❑ 3. Check here to certify that within 30 days of recording and/or registering the AUL,including amendi terminating the AUL,a Legal Notice was/will be published in a news ng,releasing or Property subject to the AUL is located- Paper with circulation in the community(ies)where the ❑ 4- Check here to certify that within 7 days of publishing a Legal Notice in a newspaper with circulation in the community(ies) where the Property subject to the AUL is located,a copy of the notice was/will be submitted to DEP. 5. Check here to certify that within 30 days of recording and/or registering the AUL,including amending,releasing or • ❑ terminating the AUL,a certified copy of the AUL,including the LSP Opininon containing the materiel fads,data,and other information, will be submitted to DEP_ Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is i *L7 rrections to the DEP Regional Office. P ncorrect,e.g.Site Address/Location Aid. Send If an Evaluation of Clain in Land Uses/AcdvWes and/or Siteatementis Conditions after a Response Action Outcome beingsubmitted,checkhere to certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts,data,and other ormation is attached.W AT10NOFOt�RpFpROPERTyFNTPAN iTMAULTRANSiY ff FORM:ID SWEETSERattest undertheies), subject to the AUL Pains and penalties of perjury that I am the owner of said 2. DAVID SWEETSER 3. Date: 120`18/2009 Signature ���y 14- Name of Organization: -HIGH ROCK BRIDGE 2 T.LLC 5. Contact First Name: DAVID 6.Last Name: SWEETSER 7. Street 70 WALNUT STREET 8_Title: MANAGING MEMBER 9- Crtyrrcmn: WELLESLEY 10. State: _NA 11- ZIP Code: 024810000 Telephone: 781?dstsenn0 13.End.: 14_ FAX Revised:06/27/2003 Page 3 of 4 L' Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC113 ACTIVITY$ USE LIMITATION (AUL)TRANSMITTAL FORM Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40-1056& 40.1070-40.1084(Subpart J) 4. � H. CERTff1CAT1ON OF PERSON MAKING SUBMITTAL- 1 1, DAVID SWEETSER ,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury(i)that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form,#Q that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in this submittal is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete,and(iii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made amrs aware that there are significant penalties,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,for willfully submitting false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. Pursuant to 310 CMR 40-1074(1)(f), I also hereby certify under penalties of perjury, that either I(if person subm itting the AUL Transmittal Form is the property owner), or HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC 2. Name of Property Owner amfis identified on the Notice of AUL as the owner of the property subject to the AUL,owned such property on the date that the AUL was recorded and/or registered 3_ By t<`Sa, Y.t '`` WIN � a ', psi` 4. Trtle: Signature 5. For. OSRANI SYLVANIA PRODUCTS INC 6. Date: 12/18/2009 • (Nam of person or entity recorded in Section D) . mnVdd1yM Q 7_ Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section D. 8. Street 70 WALNUT STREET 9. City/rown: WELLESLEY 10. State: MA 11. ZIP Code: 024810000 12. Telephone: 7812488000 13.Ext.: 14_ FAX ter YOU ARE SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL.COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE FEE OF UP TO$10,000 PER .� BILLABLE YEAR FOR TM DISPOSAL SITE YOU MUST LAY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF TM FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMI NTAS INCOMPLETE. LF YOU SUBWT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,YOU MAYBE PENAL M FOR MISSING A REfAMtED DEAD r tF Date Stamp(DEP USE ONLY:) Received by DEP on 12/18/2009 4:32:22 PM Revised:06/27/2003 Page 4 of 4 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC113A • ACTIVITY&USE LIMITATION (AUL)OPINION FORM Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.10564 40.1070-40.1084(Subpart J) ' A. DISPOSAL SffE LOCATION: skrx 1. Disposal Site Name: Se'rlc� vty a11� y, � :� + t � � A4sw � ^" t`S ra3r , y yys •,, � 2_ Street Address: �€�€r 1. "Y 3. Crlyfrown. t ,.Y,: t uq �.T._ { ,a b.. i t .5 , 4. ZIP Code: B. THIS FORM IS BRIG USED TO: (diedk one) I- Provide the LSP Opinion for a Notice of Activity and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR.40.1074. 2_ Provide the LSP Opinion for an Evaluation of Ganges in Land UsesfActiitles and/or Site Concritions after a Response Q Action Outcome StatmnmA pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1080_ include BWSC113A as an attachment to BWSC113. Section A and C do not need to be completed. Q 3_ Provide the LSP Opinion for an Amended Notice of Activity and use LSmrtation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1081(4). ® 4_ Provide the LSP Opinion for a Partial Temnirmtion of a Notice of Ac&W and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(3). • 5_ Provide the LSP Opinion for a Termination of a Notice of Activity and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(1xd). F-1 6_ Provide the LSP Opinion for a Grant of Environmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1071. Q 7_ Provide the LSP Opinion for an Amendment of a Grant of Environmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1081(3). u 8_ Provide the LSP Opinion for a Partial Release of a Grant of Environmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(2). Q 9_ Provide the LSP Opinion for a Release of a Grant of Environmental Restriction,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1083(1)(c). 10_ Provide the LSP Opinion for a Confirmatory Activity and Use Limitation,pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1085(4)_ (Unless otherwise noted above,all sections of this form(BWSC113A)must be completely filled out,printed, stamped,signed with black ink and attached as an exhibit to the AUL Document to be recorded and/or registered with the Registry of Deeds and/or Land Registration Office.) C AUL INFORMAMC I. Is the address of the property subject to AUL different from the disposal site address listed above? ® a_ No ❑ b. Yes If yes,then fill out address section below. 2. Street Address: 3. City/Town: 4. ZIP Code: Revised:06/27/2003 Page 1 of 2 L Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC113A I ACTIVITY$USE LIMITATION(AUL)OPINION FORM Release Tracking Number .� Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1056& 40.1070-40.1084 Su Y LSP SIGNATURE AND STAMP. lincluding attest under the pairs and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based u pon(i)the standard of pro in 309 CMR 4.02(1),(ii)the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2)and(3).and 309 CMR4.03(2),and i)the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3),to the best of my knowledge,information and belief, if Section B indicates that a Notice of Acgvlty and Use L.imNation is being registered and/orrecor died,the Limitation that is the subject of this submittal(i)is being provided in accordance with the Activity and Use and 310 CMR 40.0000 and 00 complies with 310 CMR 40.1074; apPrlrcable provisions of M.G.L c.21 E > if Section B indicates ttiat anEvalnaftn of Changes in Land Uses✓Activities and/or Site Conditions after 00tcome Statement is being submitted,this evaluation was devel Response Action 21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and Qi)complies with 310 CMR 40.1080; rn accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L_c. > IT Section B indicates that anAmmnded Notice ofAchiedy and Use Limitation orAmendment to a Grant of EnvIr iamental Restrictibn is being registered and/or recorded,the provided in accordance with the i Activity and Use Limitation that is the subject of this submittal(i)is being app!cable provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000 and(ii)complies with 40.1081; > rfsection B indicates that Termination or Partial Termination Of Notice ofAcdW*and Use Limrta>bi Partial Rek6se ofa Grant OfEnviron�l Restriction is beingova Release or is the subject of this submittal r is bet registered and/orrecorded,the Activity and Use In that Q being provided in accordance with the applicable provisions of M_G.L.c.21E and 310 CMR .0000 and GO complies with 310 CMR 40.1083; > if Section B indicates that a Grant OfEnwmnmmdd Restriction is being registered and/or recorded,the • Limitation that is the subject of this submittal i is bet Activity and Use Ind nd 310 CMR 40.0000 and(ii)complies with 310 CMR 40r 1071 in accordance with t applicable provisions of M.G.L c.21 E if Section B indicates that a ConrVinafivyA�,and Use Limitation is being registered and/or recorded,the Activity and Use imitation that is the subject of this submittal(i)is being provided in accordance with the applicable Provisions of M.G.L.c.21 E 310 CMR 40.0000 and(ii)complies with 310 CMR 40.1085(4); I am aware that significant penalties may result,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,if I submit information which I know to be false,inaccurate or materially incomplete. 1_ LSP# A kx +'v'-nS �7pi 14 T'4: 2_ First Names zt -NE� 3. Last Name: , r r z att ,fix . Telephone Ext 5. �� �; w.. 6. FAX 7. Signature: lCr $ D �;;� ate: 9. LSP Stamp: d�y�,yy of Electronic Sea! 0 ne P • Revised:06/27/2003 Page 2 of 2 f t IGZA Engineers and GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Scientists • VIA EMAIL November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 David Sweetser, Managing Member High Rock Bridge Street, LLC c/o High Rock Development,LLC 70 Walnut Street Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481 Re: Licensed Site Professional Opinion and Additional Risk Assessment 60 Bridge Street Salem, Massachusetts 202 Kent Place Newmarket, Dear Mr. Sweetser: New Hampshire 03857 p.603-659-3559 In accordance with your request, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has prepared this f 603-659-7750 additional Risk Assessment in support of a Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Opinion for www.gza.com 1�I� the subject property. This study has been completed in accordance with our executed agreement with High Rock Bridge Street, LLC, dated June 2, 2009. The contents of this • report are subject to the Limitations contained in Appendix A. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF SERVICES GZA has completed a characterization of potential human health risks associated with exposures to indoor air potentially impacted by vapor intrusion at the 60 Boston Street Site (Site) located in Salem, Massachusetts. The Site is listed with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) under Release Tracking Numbers (RTN) 3-0016766. This risk characterization was prepared to support the LSP Opinion that changes the permitted uses in the Activity and Use Limitations (AUL) for the Site. The AUL was originally submitted on April 22, 1999 and amended on January 24, 2002. This additional Risk Assessment and LSP Opinion address the change of the Site use from the originally planned Osco Drug Store to the currently planned Senior Center and Health Club. GZA conducted the risk characterization in accordance with the requirements of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) and MassDEP Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization (MassDEP, 1995 and the subsequent updates). The cancer risks and non-cancer hazard indices for potential building occupants with ----- exWsur-e--to-indoor-air-potent-ia-lfy-impacted-by vapor-intrusion-at-the-Site-do-not-exceed ----- the MCP non-cancer hazard target limit of 1 and the cancer target risk limit of 1x10-5. • Therefore, the residual concentrations of contaminants in site groundwater pose no Copyright©2009 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FN/H , High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No 04 0024926 01 Page 2 • significant risks to potential human receptors due to vapor inhalation. The key components of any risk assessment are data, exposure, and toxicity. Components of each of these elements are summarized in this report. BACKGROUND A Method 3 risk characterization was submitted with the April 1999 Class A-3 Response Action Outcome (RAO) and AUL. The Method 3 risk characterization concluded that a CJZX) condition of No Significant Risk, as defined by the MCP, existed with the AUL recorded at the Site. A pharmacy was planned to be built at the east side of the Site when the risk characterization was performed, and the Method 3 risk characterization evaluated potential risks to facility workers working in the proposed on-site building via inhalation of vapors transported from groundwater into indoor air. The Method 3 risk characterization concluded that the use of the east side of the Site for commercial/retail building was allowed,provided a vapor barrier would be installed to prevent migration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into indoor air. Currently, use of the Site is proposed for a multiuse building consisting of a Community Life Center/ Senior Center, municipal and professional office space, atrium, Health Club and accessory spaces (Figure 1). The potential vapor intrusion pathway and potential risks to users of the newly proposed building have been evaluated and presented in this risk assessment. The other potential exposure pathways at the Site were addressed in the previous Method 3 risk characterization, and the risk conclusions would still be valid for • the Site. This additional Risk Assessment provides the technical support to an LSP Opinion clarifying the permitted usages at the Site. DATA USED IN RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND HAZARD IDENTIFICATION The groundwater data set used for this risk characterization is presented in Table B-1 and summarized in Table B-2.1 Groundwater data collected from the six monitoring wells located within 30 feet from the proposed buildings (i.e., GZ-B, GZ-E, B 102-OW, B104-OW, B105-OW, and B106-OW) were used in this risk characterization. These data were collected in March and April 1996 and November 1997. The well locations are included on Figure 1,Site Plan. onst-it-uents detec-ted-in-the- ft-g-0undwater-samples-mc-luded_Ll_VO.Cs,_3_semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), 4 metals, extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH), and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH). All detected compounds were identified as constituents of concern (COCs) in groundwater and consequently included in this risk characterization. The COCs identified for the risk characterization are summarized in Table B-3. • ' A full set of the groundwater data available for the Site is presented in the 1999 RAO report. High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30,2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 3 • EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Receptors Facility workers (i.e., staffs of the Senior Center or Health Club) working inside the proposed buildings and child users (ages 2-18 years old) were identified as the most sensitive populations that may be exposed to the potentially impacted indoor air at the V Site, based on the current and reasonably foreseeable activities and uses. The LSP Opinion prohibits use of the Site as a residence or a full-time day care center or children's school where children are present for a full school day for the entire school week(5 days per week, 6 hours per day). Risk estimates were not calculated for other potential receptors that would be expected to have less frequent or intense exposure than the receptors evaluated, such as adult and senior visitors/customers. If a condition of No Significant Risk is shown to exist for the selected receptor groups,a condition of No Significant Risk will also exist for these other potential receptor groups. Exposure Point Concentration Elevated VOC levels (i.e., above the GW-2 standards)were detected in GZ-E, B102-OW, • and B105-OW; these wells were located to the east of the Senior Center, to the west of the Senior Center, and to the south of the Health Club, respectively. Therefore, three distinctive exposure points were identified for this risk characterization: GZ-E area, B102-OW area,and B105-OW area. GZ-E was located within 30 feet from the proposed Senior Center Building footprint.The temporal average concentrations based on the March and April 2006 rounds of results for GZ-E were calculated and used as the groundwater exposure point concentrations(EPCs) for the GZ-E area. B 102-OW was located within the proposed Senior Center Building footprint. The maximum detected concentrations at B102-OW were used as the groundwater EPCs for the B102-OW area. GZ-B was located approximately 40 feet to the northeast of B 102-OW. Benzene was the only analyte detected in GZ-B and the detected concentration was lower than the maximum benzene concentration observed at W. B 104-OW, B 105-OW, and B 106-OW were located within 30 feet of the proposed Health Club Building footprint. Because the groundwater data set was limited, as a conservative step, the maximum detected concentrations among these three wells were used as the groundwater EPCs for the B 105-OW area. T�em�c oor air EP s were estimate usi—'ng�he fo�llowmg— e�ion: —� • High Rock Bridge Street, LLC November 30, 2009 File No 04 0024926 01 Page 4 • EPCai,= EPCgw x a x l/d x H x C where: EPCai, = Estimated indoor air EPC (µg/m3). Cgw = The groundwater EPC (µg/L). NX a = An attenuation factor derived from contaminant-specific parameters 1 (dimensionless), see Tables B-8A, B-8B, and B-8C for three exposure Points (GZ-E,B102-OW,and B105-OW), respectively. d = A modification (or dilution) factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations (dimensionless). GZA used the default MassDEP values (MassDEP, 2008). H = Henry's Law Constant for the volatile constituent(dimensionless). C = Units conversion factor; 1,000 µg/m3 per 1 µg/L. The Johnson and Ettinger model was used to derive the chemical-specific soil gas to indoor air attenuation factors. The following assumptions were used in the calculation of attenuation factors for the on-site buildings: The Senior Center Building was assumed to have an area of approximately 20,000 square • feet, a perimeter of approximately 800 feet, and a ceiling height of 14 feet. These parameters were assumed based on the preliminary design of the Senior Center Building and were used to develop attenuation factors for two exposure points GZ-E and B102-OW; the Health Club Building was assumed to have an area of approximately 15,000 square feet, a perimeter of approximately 496 feet, and a ceiling height of 14 feet. These parameters were assumed based on the preliminary design of the Health Club Building and were used to develop attenuation factors for exposure point B105-OW; the depths to groundwater were assumed to be 3.8 feet, 3.0 feet, and 3.0 feet for three exposure points (GZ-E, B102-OW, and B105-OW), respectively. The groundwater depths at GZ-E ranged between 3.8 feet and 4.0 feet during the March and April 1996 measurements; therefore, the groundwater depth at GZ-E was conservatively assumed to be 3.8 feet. The groundwater depth measurements at B102-OW or B105-OW were not available; the groundwater depths ranged between 3.0 feet and 3.2 feet at GZ-B, which was approximately 400 feet to the northeast of B102-OW, during the March and April 1996 measurements. The groundwater depth at B102-OW and B105-OW was conservatively assumed to be 3.0 feet. This is a conservative assumption because actual groundwater readings mostly ranged from 3 to 4 feet below the current grade; the air exchange rate in both the Senior Center Building and the Health Club Building provided by the architect is six air exchanges per hour based on the preliminary design of the buildings. The calculation of indoor air EPCs is shown in Appendix B, Risk Assessment Tabulations. Tables B-5A, B-5B, and B-5C present three exposure points GZ-E, • B102-OW, and B105-OW, respectively. The derivations of site- and chemical-specific attenuation factors are presented in Tables B-6A through B-8C. Calculated attenuation � 1 High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 _File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 5 • factors for the COCs in groundwater at three exposure points were close to 1 x 10-5 for the proposed buildings. The groundwater and indoor air EPCs are presented in Table B-4. GZA notes that the guidance that is currently being drafted by MassDEP for evaluation of vapor intrusion impacts does not advocate using vapor intrusion modeling as a line of evidence for characterizing the vapor intrusion pathway in a particular building. However, it is GZA's opinion that for this Site, the Johnson and Ettinger modeling completed for this risk characterization is an important line of evidence because the buildings do not currently exist. Further, the Johnson and Ettinger modeling completed for this risk characterization represents a conservative method for evaluating possible indoor air impacts. A vapor barrier is required by the AUL to be installed for the proposed buildings. However, the mitigation of VOCs into indoor air by the vapor barrier was not incorporated into the Johnson and Ettinger model. For these reasons, it is GZA's opinion that impacts to indoor air would.not be anticipated at the proposed -buildings and the modeling approach represents a conservative evaluation. Exposure Assumptions The exposure assumptions for the identified receptors were intended to approximate the frequency, duration, and manner in which receptors are exposed to environmental media. • Facility workers (i.e., Senior Center and Health Club staffs) were assumed to work in the buildings and inhale the indoor air 8 hours a day and 5 days per week for 50 weeks per year (assuming 2 weeks of vacation per year). The exposure period for this receptor utilized in this analysis is 15.1 years, the longest median employer tenure (Farber, 1995). Adult users (including seniors) of the buildings are expected to have no more frequent exposure than the staffs and,therefore,were not identified as the most sensitive receptors. Child users (ages 2-18 years old) were conservatively assumed to use the buildings and inhale the indoor air 4 hours a day and 5 days per week for 50 weeks per year. The exposure period for child users utilized in this analysis is 16 years, the interval for the age group. The exposure assumptions used in this risk characterization are extremely conservative based on the programs currently run at similar facilities by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department of the City of Salem. The children's programs run by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department are mostly eek4y,1=Ao-2--heur-progr-ams-€er-ssheoI aged-children. Details of the exposure assumptions and parameters are shown in Tables B-9 and B-10 for facility workers and child users, respectively. TOXICITY FACTORS Toxicity values for the evaluation of potential exposures via the identified exposure routes were obtained from: 1) MassDEP, Office of Research and Standards (ORS) and • Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater - MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets (2008); 2) United States r y High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No 04 0024926.01 Page 6 • Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS, 2009) (an on-line database); or 3) USEPA, Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST; USEPA, 1997b). These values are presented in Tables B-11 through B-12. The toxicity values are the same for adults and children receptors for all the COCs identified in this risk characterization but vinyl chloride. For vinyl chloride, the USEPA IRIS publishes two sets of unit risk values for evaluation of cancer effects associated with inhalation. For continuous lifetime exposure from birth, the unit risk is 8.8x10"6 per 021V µg 3/m3; while for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood, the unit risk is 4.4x10-6 per µg3/m3. As a result, the unit risk of 4.4x10-6 per µg3/m3 was used for facility workers and the unit risk of 8.8x10-6 per jig 3/m3 was used for child users in accordance with the IRIS. It should be noted that vinyl chloride was not identified as a COC for B102-OW or B105-OW exposure point. As the toxicity values are the same for adults and children and as the child users have less frequent exposure than facility workers, risks were only evaluated for facility workers for B102-OW and B105-OW exposure points. If a condition of No Significant Risk is shown to exist for facility workers at B102-OW and B105-OW exposure points, a condition of No Significant Risk will also exist for child users at these two exposure points. RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND CONCLUSIONS exposures to indoor air impacted b vapor intrusion pathway were evaluated in • Potentialp P Y P this risk characterization. The risk calculation is shown in Tables B-13A through Table B-14 and the risk results are summarized in Table B-15. The non-cancer hazard indices for facility workers exposed to indoor air near GZ-E, B102-OW, and B105-OW are 0.5, 0.2, and 0.07, respectively; the non-cancer hazard indices do not exceed the MCP target limit of 1. The cancer risks for facility workers exposed to indoor air near GZ-E, B102-OW, and B105-OW are lx10"5, 6x10-', and 7x10-7,respectively;the cancer risks do not exceed the MCP risk limit of 10-5. The non-cancer hazard index for child users exposed to indoor air near GZ-E is 0.2 and do not exceed the MCP target limit of 1. The cancer risk for child users exposed to indoor air near GZ-E is 1x10-5 and do not exceed the MCP risk limit of 10-5. Based on the estimated risk results and the fact that a vapor barrier is required to be installed beneath the proposed buildings (which was not incorporated into this risk calculation), it is concluded that the COCs in site groundwater are not expected to pose significant risks to potential human receptors by entering the buildings and impacting indoor air via vapor intrusion. • High Rock Bridge Street, LLC November 30,2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 7 LSP OPINION Based on the modified Method 3 Risk Assessment presented herein, the following LSP Opinion concerning the existing AUL is made: Permitted Activities and Uses Set Forth in the AUL Opinion. The LSP Opinion provides that a condition of No Significant Risk to health, safety, public welfare or the environment exists for any foreseeable period of time (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000) so long as any of the following activities and uses occur on the Property: (i) Activities and uses consistent with the construction and use of commercial retail/industrial structures, providing that vapor barriers and passive sub-slab venting systems are incorporated into any building design at the Site. A building similar to the planned Community Life Center/ Senior Center, municipal and professional office space, atrium, Health Club and accessory spaces thereto evaluated as part of the risk characterization meets this requirement;' (ii) Commercial retail and industrial uses of the property are permissible, provided that the soil currently located at about 2 to 5 feet below surface grade remains inaccessible. Landscaping and routine maintenance of landscaped areas within • the designated AUL area that does not cause and/or result in direct contact with, disturbance of, and/or relocation of,the soil are also permitted activities; (iii) Subsurface and/or construction activities may be conducted within the designated AUL area after preparation and implementation of a Health and Safety Plan and a Soil Management Plan. The Health and Safety Plan should consider direct contact exposures and inhalation of vapors and particulates. The Soil excavation procedures, staging off- site Plan should specify excava p g g areas, and o site disposal locations; (iv) Activities and uses that are not prohibited by this Notice of AUL; and (v) Such other activities or uses, which, in the opinion of an LSP, shall present no greater risk of harm to health, safety, public welfare or the environment than the activities and uses, set forth in this Paragraph. er-tivities_and-Uses_lnconsictent with the AUL Opinion Activities and uses which are inconsistent with the objectives of this Notice of Activity and Use Limitation,and which, if implemented at the Property, may result in a significant risk of harm to health, safety, public welfare or the environment or in a substantial hazard, are as follows: i �s wlrich�naycause-an-d/or-result-in-direct-contact-with;d-isturbanee-ef,-or • relocation of site soils are prohibited without the prior development and appropriate implementation of a Health and Safety Plan and a Soil Management Plan to prevent exposure(s)via ingestion, dermal contact, and/or inhalation; High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No 04.0024926.01 Page 8 (ii) Relocation of the soil currently located at 2 to 5 feet below surface grade within the designated AUL area to a shallower depth within the designated AUL area, unless such activity is first evaluated by an LSP who renders an Opinion which attests that a condition of No Significant Risk is maintained, consistent with the provision of the MCP; (iii) Construction of any building at the Site other than the specific structure evaluated during the risk characterization without the installation of a vapor barrier and a passive sub-slab venting system unless justifiable by an indoor air risk assessment performed by a Licensed Site Professional; Removal of, or any activities that damage and/or compromise the effectiveness of, the vapor barrier and/or passive sub-slab venting system following construction; (iv) Use of the Site as a residence or a full-time day care center or children's school where children are present for a full school day for the entire school week; and (v) Use of the Site for agricultural purposes. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project, and we would be pleased to work with you through completion of the risk characterization to site closure. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the recommendations contained in this report, or require additional information,please contact us. Very truly yours, • GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL,INC. Frank S. Vetere,P.E., LSP Chunhua Liu, Sc.D., LSP Senior Project Manager Consultant/Reviewer JeffreY . Rowell Charles A. Lindberg, LS.P Associate Principal Senior Principal FSV/SAL/TDRJCAL•kr p:\04jobs\04.0024926.01_former sylvania salem auNul 2009\revised risk assessment.docx Attachments: Figure 1 —Site Plan Appendix A—Limitations Appendix B—Risk Characterization Tables • r ' High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No 04 0024926 01 Page 9 • REFERENCES Farber, Henry, 1995. "Are Lifetime Jobs Disappearing? Job Duration in the United States: 1973-1993." NBER Working Paper No.4859, Cambridge, M.A. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), 2008. "Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater." Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), 1995. "Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization in Support of Massachusetts Contingency Plan. Interim Final Policy BWSC/ORS-95-141." Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup and Office of Research and Standards. July. USEPA, 2009. "Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)," http•//www.ePa.gov/IRIS/, October. USEPA, 1997. "Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. July. • • • • FIGURE • NU UM:2915ACAD\ffiLO-0-2002 02002 GZA GenSndrpnmental, Inc. _.. ,.. .. _... .. . n h V / Z r , > D s / ycj F1 to / Yg0 om 1 �! i • { m1n m oa x� ar>��c. c -ZpD jv Dv QT 0 y1DAO�m 0 t mA % 1C, ; SN 3N i� bON tAmrQiV� �; Da4 J _6+� �Z> i 1 r �r Zv r '�r��N all Zo N yr Div vo-� o D Op � mm L'1� O� mD m� 'O N r ppZ m z g �8 7 c z co ro rn a. m vmvi � N 3Np map rn. �3 , z22 ; wigf+j a N� 10 D,9 2 o Ai ENVIRONMENTAL STTE PLAN DES'D BY :F.S.V. 1 80• D• GRAPHIC SCALE o' (�A(ATEIIVAY MEDICAL CENTER CHK D BY m$�I 60 BOSTON STREET i APP'D BY :FS.V �.... GZA.. .. .. ........... ..._.... Z p"'� SALEM MASSACHUSETTS DRAWN B9.P.N IGeo$IIpjronIIleat8l, IIIe. ..... .......... ......___ ��p(rc .�o O .. .. ._.__.__._ ... .. ..... SCALE :i'e80' }9p"HARVeEY ROAD 8 o"I DATE :OCT. 2009 (e01)023-3= MANCNESTER.NEW HAMPSHOM 03103 i • APPENDIX A • LIMITATIONS • RISK CHARACTERIZATION LMTATIONS 1. The interpretations and conclusions presented in this report were based solely upon the services described herein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services. The work described in this report was carried out in accordance with the agreed upon Terms and Conditions. 2. GZA's risk characterization was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time. The findings of the risk characterization are dependent on numerous assumptions and uncertainties inherent in the risk assessment process. Sources of uncertainty may include the description of site conditions and the nature and extent of chemical distribution and the use of toxicity information. Consequently, the findings of the risk characterization are not an absolute characterization of actual risks, but rather serve to highlight potential sources of risk at the site. Although the range of uncertainties has not been quantified, the use of conservative assumptions and parameters throughout the assessment would be expected to err on the side of protection of human health and the environment. 3. The analysis and conclusions submitted in this report are based upon chemical data collected by GZA and other consultants during investigations of the Site. 4. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of High Rock Bridge Street, LLC, for specific application to the disposal Site identified by Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Release Tracking Number (RTN) 3-00427 and 3-16766 and located at 60 Bridge Street in Salem, Massachusetts, in accordance with generally accepted risk assessment practices. No other warranty,express or implied, is made. L:\04Jobs\04.0024926.01—former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\Risk Assessment Report\Appendix A Risk Limits.doc • 04.0024926.01 APPENDIX A GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. • APPENDIX B RISK CHARACTERIZATION TABLES • • • TABLE B-1 File No.24928.01 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pege 1 012 11rSo/2009 Former OSPAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Results are in ppm(mgn) Company GZA GZA NBA H&A Sample ID GZ-B GZ-B GZ-E GZ-E B102-OW B102-OW Date 3/28/96 4/22/96 Averse 3/28/96 4122196 Averse 1114/97 Maximum Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting eporting Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result LimitResult Limit Result Limit Result Limn Result Limit Volatile Ontanic C ound 8240 8240 8260 8260 8260 VPH 1,1,1-Trichloroeths a NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 4.6 0.25 4.6 0.25 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 ND 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 0.91 0.25 0.91 0.25 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.251,2,4-Trimethylbe ene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 1,3,5Trimethylbe ene NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 Benzene 0.019 ND 0.005 0.01075 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 ND 0.25 0.025 0.001 0.025 0.25 Carbon Disulfide NO .01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 2 ND OA NO 1.2 NO 1.2 NO 1.2Carbon Tetrachlori a NO 0005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 Chlorobenzene NO 0 005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 Chloroethane NO 0005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 2 NO OA NO 1.2 ND 1.2 NO 1.2 Chloroform NO 0D05 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 ND 0.6 NO 1.2 NO 1.2 cis-1,2-Dichloroeth ne NO 0005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 49 7.5 2825 0.33 0.25 0.33 0.25 Ethylbenzene NO 0005 NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 ND 0.25 0.006 0.001 0.006 0.25 Methyl tert Butyl El her NO .01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 2 NO 0.4 NO 12 NO O.002 NO 0.002 N-Propylbenzene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 Naphthalene NO 1 ND 0.2 ND 0.6 0.0024 0.001 0.0024 0.001 Naphthalene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.005 0.0024 0.001 0.0024 0.005 '-Isopropyltoluene NO 1 NO 0.2 ND 0.6 oluene NO 0 005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 1.3 0.36 0.83 NO 0.25 0.16 0.001 0.16 0.25 richloroethene NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 34 3.7 18.85 2 0.25 2 0.25 inyl Chloride NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 3.9 1.3 2.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 ylenes NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 ND 0.6 NO 0.25 0.044 0.001 0.044 0.25 Semivolatile Oroanic Compounds 8270 3-and 4-Methylph nol 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Benzoic add 0.011 0.005 0.011 0.005 NO 0.005 0.0022 0.001 0.0022 0.005 Naphthalene 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 Phenol Metal enic NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Chromium NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Nickel NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.033 0.02 0.033 0.02 nc Total Petroleum ydrocarbons NO 025 ND 0.25 NO 0.25 Volatile Petroleurr Hydrocarbon CS-C8 Aliphatic Faction 0.065 0.01 .06 0.01 C9-C12 Aliphatic.-Fraction0.0 C9-C10Aromatic Fraction 0..02020.0 0.011 00..0202 0.011 Extractable Petrol um Hydrocarbons C9418 Aliphatic aaction ND 0.22 NO 0.22 C19 C36Afiphati Erection NO 0.32 NO 0.32 C10-C22Aromati Fraction NO 0.2 NO 0.2 Notes: 1.Only samp s collected within GW-2 area(i.e.,within 30 feet from the proposed building footprint)are included in this table. 2.Average cc noentrations were calculated and used to represent the conditions for wells with multiple rounds of sampling. The nonde were assumed to be half of the reporting limits for the average calculation if the analyte was detected in at least one round of sampling. When field d upticate samples were collected,the maximum concentrations of the field duplicate pair were used to represent the well conditions for the round. L9'DOroW04.0024926.01 f Svlvania Salsa AUL\VI Evaluation 200 A24926.01 dataXLS\G1k Pat QA:CL Mw 10/12M TABLE B4 File No.249M.01Page ,I GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS 2 of 2 11/3 Fortner OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. lrsorzoos 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Results are in ppm(mg/1) Company H&A H&A H&A H&A H&A H&A Sample ID B104-OW B104-OW 8105.OW B105-OW B106.OW B106-OW Date 11/4/97 Maximum 11/4197 Maximum 11/4/97 Maximum Rep rting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Result Li it Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result I Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Volatile anic Coand 8260 VPH 8260 VPH 8260 VPH 1.1,1-Tdchloroethana NO OX 01 NO 0.001 3.5 0.001 3.5 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.0022 0.0022 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 1,1-Dichloroethene NO 0101 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 1,2,4-Trimethylbenz ne 1,3,5•Trimethylbenz me Benzene NO 0. 01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 Carbon Disulfide NO 0.(05 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Carbon Tetrachlorid NO 0.(01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 Chlorobenzene NO 0.(01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 Chloroethene NO 0. 05 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Chloroform NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 cis-1,2-Dichloroethe ne NO 0. 01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 Ethylbenzene NO 0. 01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 Methyl tert Butyl Ett er 0.0025 0.002 0,0025 0.002 NO 0.002 NO 0.002 NO 0.002 NO 0.002 N-Propylbenzene Naphthalene NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 Naphthalene NO 0. 05 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 p-Isopropyholuene oluene NO 0.)01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 richloroethene NO 0. 01 NO 0.001 2.1 0.001 2.1 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 myl Chloride NO 0.)01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ylenes NO 0.)01 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001. NO 0.001 Semivola6le O am Compounds 8270 8270 8270 3-and 4-Methylphe iol NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Benzoic acid NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.013 0.005 0.013 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Naphthalene NO 0. 05 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 Phenol NO 0.305 NO 0.005 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Metals nic 0.03 0.005 0.03 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.23 0.005 0.23 0.005 Chromium 0.0053 0. 05 0.0053 0.005 0.0058 0.005 0.0058 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Nickel 0.0056 0. OS 0.0056 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Zinc 0.12 0t02 NO 0.001 0.12 0.02 0.047 0.02 0.047 0.02 0.053 0.02 0.053 0.02 Total Petroleum Hv II�rocarbons Volatile Petroleum H rocarbons C5-C8 Aliphatic Fr.cdon NO 0.01 NO 0.01 0.58 0.01 0.58 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 C9-C12 Aliphatics rection NO 0.02 NO 0.02 NO 0.02 NO 0.02 NO 0.02 NO 0.02 C9-C 10 Aromatic F raction NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 Extractable Petiole m H rocarbont C9-C18 Aliphatic F ction NO 0.22 NO 0.22 0.28 0.22 0.28 0.22 NO 0.22 ND 0.22 C19-C36Aliphatic raction NO 0.32 NO 0.32 1.9 0.32 1.9 0.32 NO 0.32 ND 0.32 C10-C22 Aromati Fraction NO 0.2 NO 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.2 NO 0.2 NO 0.2 Notes: 1.Only samples collected within GW-2 area(i.e.,within 30 feet from the proposed building footprint)are included in this table. 2.Average cor centrations were calculated and used to represent the conditions for wells with multiple rounds of sampling. The nondects were assumed to be half of the reporting limits for the average calculation if the anayte was detected in at least one round of sampling. When field duplicate samples were collected,the maximum concentrations of the field duplicate pair were used to represent the wall conditions for the round. - L:\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 f S,vl-in Salem AUL\Vl Evaluation 2 4926.01 dato.xlSQW Dat QA:CL Date:10112M 0 0 0 TABLE B-2 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES(ppm) Page 1 of 1 • Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/15/2009 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Frequency Range Location of Arithmetic Contaminant of Detected Maximum Mean Detection Detected Concentration Concentration Volatile Oroanic Compound 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 / 6 ND - 4.6 B102-OW 1.4 1,1-Dichloroethane 2 / 6 ND - 0.91 B102-OW 0.20 Benzene 2 / 6 ND - 0.025 B102-OW 0.0075 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2 / 6 ND - 28.25 GZ-E 4.764 Ethylbenzene 1 / 6 ND - 0.006 B102-OW 0.0020 Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 1 / 6 ND - 0.0025 B104-OW 0.0014 Naphthalene 1 / 5 ND - 0.0024 B102-OW 0.0024 Toluene 2 / 6 ND - 0.83 GZ-E 0.17 Trichloroethene 3 / 6 ND - 18.85 GZ-E 3.8 Vinyl Chloride 1 / 6 ND - 2.6 GZ-E 0.45 Xylene(Total) 1 / 6 ND - 0.044 B102-OW 0.0096 Semivolatile Omanic Compounds 3-and 4-Methylphenol 2 / 4 ND - 0.0056 B105-OW 0.0039 Benzoic acid 2 / 4 ND - 0.013 B105-OW 0.0073 Phenol 2 / 4 ND - 0.0056 B102-OW 0.0041 • Metals Arsenic 2 / 4 ND - 0.23 B106-OW 0.066 `Chromium 2 / 4 ND - 0.0058 B105-OW 0.0040 Nickel 1 / 4 ND - 0.0056 B104-OW 0.003 Zinc 4 / 4 0.033 - 0.12 B104-OW 0.063 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 2 / 4 ND - 2.8 B102-OW 0.85 C9-C12 Aliphatics Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.065 B102-OW 0.024 C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.02 B102-OW 0.0088 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.28 B105-OW 0.15 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 1.9 B105-OW 0.60 C10-C22 Aromatics Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.7 B105-OW 0.25 Notes: 1 Only detected analytes are listed. Laboratory reporting limits are shown in the Groundwater Analytical Results Table. 2 Samples included in these statistics are presented in the Groundwater Analytical Results Table. 3. For the purpose of calculating arithmetic mean concentrations,one-half the reporting limit was used to represent the-concentrations of constituentrepo rted as non-detects(ND) 4. If a well was sampled more than once,the summary statistics are based on the average concentration over time at that particular well. If a field duplicate pair was collected,the summary statistics are based on the maximum concentrations detected in the pair. \\Gzanewmarket\obs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 data.XLS\gw SUM QA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-3 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10n5i2009 • 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts CLASS ANALYTE GROUNDWATER <<<VOC>>> 1,1,1-Trichloroethane COC 1,1-Dichloroethane COC Benzene COC cis-1,2-Dichloroethene COC Ethylbenzene COC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether COC Naphthalene COC Toluene COC Trichloroethene COC Vinyl Chloride COC Xylene(Total) COC <<<SVOC>>> 4-Methylphenol COC Benzoic acid COC Phenol COC <<<TPH>>> C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction COC C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction COC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction COC C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fraction COC • C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction COC <<< Inorganics>>> Arsenic COC Chromium (total) COC Nickel COC Zinc COC Notes: 1. Only analytes detected in the samples included in this risk characterization (i.e. samples listed in Table B-1)were evaluated as potential constituents of concern. 2.The C9-C12 aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction was evaluated as part of the C9-C18 aliphatic fraction because concentrations of constituents in the C9-C12 apliphatic range are included in the C9-C18 aliphatic range. 3. 3-and 4-methylphenol was evaluated as 4-methylphenol. 4. C10-C22 aromatics fraction was evaluated as C11-C22 aromatics fraction. X%GzanewmarketyobsW4JobsX04.0024926.01 fomier Sylvania Salem MUM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Exp Con.)ds\COC Selection QA: CL Date: 10/12/09 TABLE B-4 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/15/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts EPC1A EPC2A EPC1B EPC26 EPC1C EPC2C Concentrations Estimated Concentrations Estimated Concentrations Estimated COC at Concentration at Concentration at Concentration GZ-E Area" in Indoor B102-OW Area in Indoor B105-OW Area` in Indoor Air° Air° Air° (pg/L) /m' /L Im' /L /m' 11,1-Trichloroethane ND NC 4,600 3.3E+01 3500 2.6E+01 1,1-Dichl)roethane ND NC 910 2.1 E+00 2.2 5.3E-03 Benzene ND NC 25 5.8E-03 ND NC cis-1,2-D chloroethene 28,250 4.7E+01 330 5.6E-01 ND NC Ethylben ene ND NC 6 2.0E-03 ND NC Methyl-Ti rl-Butyl-Ether ND NC ND NC 2.5 6.3E-04 Naphtha)ane ND NC 2.4 4.4E-04 ND NC Toluene 830 2.3E-01 160 4.4E-02 ND NC Trichloro Dthene 18,850 7.6E+01 2,000 8.2E+00 2100 8.9E+00 Vinyl Chl 3nde 2,600 3.0E+01 ND NC ND NC Xylene( otal) ND NC 44 1.2E-02 ND NC 4-Methyl phenol ND NC 5 2.1E-06 5.6 2.4E-06 Benzoic )cid ND NC 11 1.7E-07 13 2.1E-07 Phenol ND NC 5.6 7.8E-07 5.6 8.0E-07 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction ND NC ND NC 700 2.2E-02 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND NC ND NC 1900 NC C5-C8 A iphatic Fraction ND NC 2,800 1.5E+02 580 3.2E+01 C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fraction ND NC 20 6.6E-03 ND NC C9-C18 liphatic Fraction ND NC 65 4.5E+00 280 2.0E+01 Arsenic ND NC ND NC 230 NC Chromiu (total) ND NC ND NC 5.8 NC Nickel ND NC ND NC 5.6 NC Zinc ND NC 33 NC 47 NC Notes: a• The gro ndwater exposure point concentration for the GZ-E area is based on the arithmetic mean concentration of groundwater samples obtained from GZ-E. b• The gro ndwater exposure point oncentration for the B102-OW area is based on the maximum detected concentration of groundwater samples obtained from B102-OW. C. The gro ndwater exposure point oncentration for the 6105-OW area is based on the maximum detected concentration of groundwater samples obtained from B104-O ,B105-OW,and B10 W. d• The indo r air exposure point con ntrations were modeled from groundwater based on a conservative vapor intrusion model presented in TABLES B-5A,B-56,AND B-5C, for GZ-E area,B102-OW area,a B105-OW area,respectively. Abbreviati ns: COC=cons ituent of concern. ND=not detected. NC=not cal ulated. \\Gzanewmarket\jobs 04Jobs\04.0024926.01 forme Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Exp Con.xls\EPC QA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-5A File No.24926.01 ESTIMATING INDOOR AIR EPCS I NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 1o/lanoos Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street • Salem,Massachusetts Calculated Estimated Groundwater Attenuation Dilution Henry's Law Indoor Air COC EPC1A Factorz Factor Constant 3 Concentration (I/gA) (a) (d) (H) (Ng/m3) (dimensionless) EPCeIr 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00E-05 1 7.0E-01 NC 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00E-05 1 2.3E-01 NC Benzene ND 1.01 E-05 10 2.3E-01 NC cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 28,250 1.00E-05 1 1.7E-01 4.7E+01 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether ND 1.01E-05 1 2.4E-02 NC Naphthalene ND 9.96E-06 1 1.8E-02 NC Toluene 830 1.01E-05 10 2.7E-01 2.3E-01 Trichloroethene 18,850 1.01E-05 1 4.0E-01 7.6E+01 Vinyl Chloride 2,600 1.01 E-05 1 1.1E+00 3.0E+01 Xylene(Total) ND 1.01E-05 10 2.7E-01 NC 4-Methylphenol ND 1.00E-05 1 4.1 E-05 NC Benzoic acid NO 9.98E-06 1 1.6E-06 NC Phenol ND 1.01E-05 1 1.4E-05 NC C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction ND 9.97E-06 10 2.9E-02 NC C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND NA 10 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction ND 1.01 E-05 10 5.3E+01 NC C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction ND 1.00E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction ND 1.00E-05 10 6.8E+01 NC Arsenic ND NA 1 NA NC Chromium(total) ND NA 1 NA NC Nickel ND NA 1 NA NC Zinc ND NA 1 NA NC • 1.The following equation was used to model indoor air concentrations of volatile constituents based on concentrations detected in groundwater. EPCair=Cgw*(a'1/d`H'C) where: EPCeIr = Exposure point concentration in indoor air,in units of pg/m3 Cgw=The groundwater concentrations at GZ-E. a= A calculated attentuation factor which relates the indoor air concentration to the concentration in the soil gas directly above the groundwater source.See Table B-8A. d= A modification(or dilution)factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations. Dimensionless. GZA used the default MassDEP values used in"Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater-MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets." February,2008. H= Henrys Law Constant,dimensionless form. C= Units Conversion Factor,1000 liter/m'. 2.Attenuation factors were only calculated for constituents considered to be volatile according to USEPA guidelines where the Henrys Law Constant is greater than 1 x 105 and the Molecular weight is less than 200 g/mole(USEPA,1989:RAGS Part B). 3.Constituent-specific values for Henrys Law Constant were obtained from MassDEP,Development of MCP Risk Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater,February 2008.Henrys law constants for VPH/EPH were obtained from Massachusetts DEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach,October 2002. For compounds not listed in either of the MassDEP documentations,USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(GW-ADV-Feb04.x1s), February,2004 was used as a reference. Qhhrevoations' COC=constituent of concern;NA=Not applicable/Not Analyzed;NC=Not Calculated;ND=Not Detected. • %%Gzanewmarkefgobs%04JobsX04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009%24926.01 Indoor Air(GW).xls\SUMDER_A QA: CL Date: 10/12/09 TABLE B-5B File No.24926.01 ESTIMATING INDOOR AIR EPCS I NEAR B102-OW Page 1 of 1 • 1o/lanoos Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Calculated Estimated Groundwater Attenuation Dilution Henry's Law Indoor Air COC EPC1 B Factorz Factor Constant 3 Concentration WA) (a) (d) (H) (Ng/ml (dimensionless) EPC& 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4,600 1.02E-05 1 7.0E-01 3.3E+01 1,1-Dichloroethane 910 1.02E-05 1 2.3E-01 2.1 E+00 Benzene 25 1.02E-05 10 2.3E-01 5.8E-03 c7is-1,2-Dichloroethene 330 1.02E-05 1 1.7E-01 5.6E-01 Ethylbenzene 6.0 1.02E-05 10 3.2E-01 2.0E-03 Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether ND 1.02E-05 1 2.4E-02 NC Naphthalene 2.4 1.02E-05 1 1.8E-02 4.4E-04 Toluene 160 1.02E-05 10 2.7E-01 4.4E-02 Trichloroethene 2,000 1.02E-05 1 4.0E-01 8.2E+00 Vinyl Chloride ND 1.02E-05 1 1.1E+00 NC Xylene(Total) 44 1.02E-05 10 2.7E-01 1.2E-02 4-Methylphenol 5.0 1.02E-05 1 4.1E-05 2.1E-06 Benzoic acid 11 1.02E-05 1 1.6E-06 1.7E-07 Phenol 5.6 1.02E-05 1 1.4E-05 7.8E-07 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction ND 1.02E-05 10 2.9E-02 NC C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND NA 10 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 2,800 1.02E-05 10 5.3E+01 1.5E+02 C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fraction 20 1.02E-05 10 3.2E-01 6.6E-03 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 65 1.02E-05 10 6.8E+01 4.5E+00 Arsenic ND NA 1 NA NC Chromium(total) NO NA 1 NA NC Nickel ND NA 1 NA NC • Zinc 33 NA 1 NA NC 1.The following equation was used to model indoor air concentrations of volatile constituents based on concentrations detected in groundwater. EPCalr=Cgw*(a•1/d'H`C) where: EPC& =Exposure point concentration in indoor air,in units of Ng/m' Cgw=The groundwater concentrations at 13102-OW. a= A calculated attentuation factor which relates the indoor air concentration to the concentration in the soil gas directly above the groundwater source.See Table B-86. d= A modification(or dilution)factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations. Dimensionless. GZA used the default MassDEP values used in"Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater-MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets." February,2008. H= Henry's Law Constant,dimensionless form. C= Units Conversion Factor,1000 liter/m'. 2.Attenuation factors were only calculated for constituents considered to be volatile according to USEPA guidelines where the Henrys Law Constant is greater than 1 x 10 and the Molecular weight is less than 200 g/mole(USEPA,1989:RAGS Part B). 3.Constituent-specific values for Henrys Law Constant were obtained from MassDEP,Development of MCP Risk Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater,February 2008.Henrys law constants for VPH/EPH were obtained from Massachusetts DEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach,October 2002. For compounds not listed in either of the MassDEP documentations,USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(GW-ADV-Feb04.)ls), February,2004 was used as a reference. Abbreviations, COC=constituent of concern;NA=Not applicable/Not Analyzed;NC=Not Calculated;ND=Not Detected. pGzanewmarket4obs%04Jobst04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AULWI Evaluation 2009124926.01 Indoor Air(GW).xIs1SUMDER_B ON CL Date: 10112/09 TABLE B-5C File No.24926.01 ESTIMATING INDOOR AIR EPCS I NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 1a14noos Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street • Salem,Massachusetts Calculated Estimated Groundwater Attenuation Dilution Henry's Law Indoor Air COC EPC1B Factorz Factor Constant Concentration W/1) (a) (d) (H) W/W) (dimensionless) EPC,r 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3,500 1.05E-05 1 7.0E-01 2.6E+01 1,1-Dichloroethane 2 1.05E-05 1 2.3E-01 5.3E-03 Benzene ND 1.05E-05 10 2.3E-01 NC cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.05E-05 1 1.7E-01 NC Ethylbenzene ND 1.05E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 2.5 1.05E-05 1 2.4E-02 6.3E-04 Naphthalene ND 1.04E-05 1 1.8E-02 NC Toluene ND 1.05E-05 10 2.7E-01 NC Trichloroethene 2,100 1.05E-05 1 4.0E-01 8.9E+00 Vinyl Chloride ND 1.05E-05 1 1.1E+00 NC Xylene(Total) NO 1.05E-05 10 2.7E-01 NC 4-Methylphenol 5.6 1.05E-05 1 4.1E-05 2.4E-06 Benzoic acid 13 1.04E-05 1 1.6E-06 2.1E-07 Phenol 5.6 1.05E-05 1 1.4E-05 8.0E-07 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 700 1.04E-05 10 2.9E-02 2.2E-02 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction 1,900 NA 10 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 580 1.05E-05 10 5.3E+01 3.2E+01 C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fraction ND 1.05E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction 280 1.05E-05 10 6.8E+01 2.0E+01 Arsenic 230 NA 1 NA NC Chromium(total) 5.8 NA 1 NA NC Nickel 5.6 NA 1 NA NC Zinc 47 NA 1 NA NC • 1.The following equation was used to model indoor air concentrations of volatile constituents based on concentrations detected in groundwater. EPCe„=Cam,,,'(a'1/d"H.C) where: EPCa1r =Exposure point concentration in indoor air,in units of pg/m' Cg.=The groundwater concentrations at B105-OW. the groundwater samples collected within the disposal Site boundaries. a= A calculated attentuation factor which relates the indoor air concentration to the concentration in the soil gas directly above the groundwater source.See Table B-8C. d= A modification(or dilution)factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations. Dimensionless. GZA used the default MassDEP values used in"Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater-MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets." February,2008. H= Henry's Law Constant,dimensionless form. C= Units Conversion Factor,1000 liter m . 2.Attenuation factors were only calculated for constituents considered to be volatile according to USEPA guidelines where the Henry's Law Constant is greater than 1 x 10'5 and the Molecular weight is less than 200 g/mole(USEPA,1989:RAGS Part B). 3. Constituent-specific values for Henry's Law Constant were obtained from MassDEP,Development of MCP Risk Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater,February 2008.Henry's law constants for VPH/EPH were obtained from Massachusetts DEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach,October 2002. For compounds not listed in either of the MassDEP documentations,USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(GW-ADV-Feb04.)ls), February.2004 was used as a reference. Abbreviations: COC=constituent of concern;NA=Not applicable/Not Analyzed;NC=Not Calculated;ND=Not Detected. • 1\Gzanewmarke[yobs%04Jobs104.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AULWI Evalualion 2009124926.01 Indoor Air(GW).xls%SUMDER C QA: CL Date: 10112109 L TABLE B-6A File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF"OVERALL"EFFECTIVE POROUS MEDIA DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts "Overall" Molecular Vapor Molecular Water Effective Cons ituent ry Soil Total Moisture Vapor Diffusivity Porous Media Diffusivity Porous Media Porous Media Bu k Density' Porosity' Filled Filled in Air 2 Diffusion Coeff. in Water Diffusion Coeff. Diffusion Coeff. (g/cm') Porosity' Porosity' (cmz/s) (cm2/s) (cm'/s) (cm2/s) (Cm2/s) ga n, n,n n„ Dair Dv Dwater Dm Dt cis-1,2-Dichloroethe ie 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.074 1.19E-02 1.1E-05 4.83E-09 1.19E-02 Toluene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.087 1.41 E-02 8.6E-06 3.68E-09 1.41 E-02 Trichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 9.1E-06 3.89E-09 1.28E-02 Vinyl Chloride 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.106 1.71 E-02 1.2E-05 5.26E-09 1.71 E-02 Notes: 1.The value for san was adopted from USE PA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.)ls),February,2004. 2.Contaminant-specific values were adopted from USEPNs Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\job\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 fo er Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor A.XLS\DIFFUS TABLE 136-13 File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF"OVERALL"EFFECTIVE POROUS MEDIA DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT NEAR B102-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10114/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts "Overall" Molecular Vapor Molecular Water Effective Cons ituent Dry Soil Total Moisture Vapor Diffusivity Porous Media Diffusivity Porous Media Porous Media Bulk Density' Porosity' Filled Filled in Air 2 Diffusion Coeff. in Water 2 Diffusion Coeff. Diffusion Coeff. (g/cm') Porosity' Porosity' (cm2/s) (CM2/s) (cm2/s) (Cm2/s) (cm'/s) gd nt n, n„ Dair Dv Dwater Dm Dt 1,1,1-Trichloroethan 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.078 1.26E-02 8.8E-06 3.76E-09 1.26E-02 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.074 1.20E-02 1.1E-05 4.49E-09 1.20E-02 Benzene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.088 1.42E-02 9.8E-06 4.19E-09 1.42E-02 cis-1,2-Dichloroethe ie 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.074 1.19E-02 1.1E-05 4.83E-09 1.19E-02 Ethylbenzene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.075 1.21E-02 7.8E-06 3.33E-09 1.21 E-02 Naphthalene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.059 9.54E-03 7.5E-06 3.21 E-09 9.54E-03 Toluene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.087 1.41 E-02 8.6E-06 3.68E-09 1.41 E-02 Trichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 9.1E-06 3.89E-09 1.28E-02 ylene(Total) 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 8.9E-06 3.80E-09 1.28E-02 4-Methyiphenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.072 1.17E-02 9.2E-06 3.95E-09 1.17E-02 Benzoic acid 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.061 9.85E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.85E-03 Phenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.083 1.35E-02 1.0E-05 4.40E-09 1.35E-02 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.060 9.70E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.70E-03 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.080 1.29E-02 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 1.29E-02 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0,375 0.054 0.321 0,070 1.13E-02 5.0E-06 2.14E-09 1.13E-02 Zinc 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 NA NA NA NA NA IL Notes: 1.The value for san Jwas adopted from USE PA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. 2.Contaminant-spe ific values were adopte from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\job\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 fo r Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009124926.01 Attenuation Factor B.XLS\DIFFUS • 0 TABLE B-6C File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF"OVERALL"EFFECTIVE POROUS MEDIA DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT NEAR 6105-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/1412009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts "Overall" Molecular Vapor Molecular Water Effective Consi ituent Dry Soil Total Moisture Vapor Diffusivity Porous Media Diffusivity Porous Media Porous Media BL Ik Density' Porosity' Filled Filled in Air 2 Diffusion Coeff. in Water 2 Diffusion Coeff. Diffusion Coeff. (g/cm') Porosity' Porosity' (cm'/s) (cm'/s) (cmz/s) (cm'/s) (cm'/s) gd n, n, n Dair Dv Dwater Dm Dt 1,1,1-Trichloroethan a 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.078 1.26E-02 8.8E-06 3.76E-09 1.26E-02 Trichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 9.1 E-06 3.89E-09 1.28E-02 4-Methylphenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.072 1.17E-02 9.2E-06 3.95E-09 1.17E-02 Benzoic acid 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.061 9.85E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.85E-03 Phenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.083 1.35E-02 1.0E-05 4.40E-09 1.35E-02 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.060 9.70E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.70E-03 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.080 1.29E-02 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 1.29E-02 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.070 1.13E-02 5.0E-06 2.14E-09 1.13E-02 Notes: 1.The value for sand was adopted from US PA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. 2.Contaminant-specific values were adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. QA:CL Date:10112109 %%Gzanewmarket\jo s104Jobs\04.0024926.01 fo er Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor C.XLSUFFUS TABLE B-7A File No.24926.01 CALC JLATION OF VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF SOIL GAS INTO THE BUILDING NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Length of Foundation BasemLt Total Radius of Air Pathway from Pressure Difference Vapor Volumetric Flow Soil Contact Crack Basement Basement Slab Bottom to Source to Indoor Airs Soil Intrinsic Dynamic Rate of Soil Gas Area Acr/Ab2 Area Crack Length Crack Ground Surface4 1 Pa= 10 g/cm-sz Permeabilitye Viscosity into Building (rn2) (m2) (m) (cm) (m) (Pa) (cm2) (g/cm-s) (cros/s) Ab n Acra k Xcrack r cr Zcrack dP k v u Qsoil 2,3 24 0.001 2.32 244 0.5 0.70 1 1.0E-07 1.8E-04 171 Notes: 1. Foundation Soil Contact Area(Ab)is based on approximate area exposed to soil,i.e.,the footprint of the proposed building(Senior Center). 2. n=Acrack/Ab,where Acrack=crack area(assumed to be 0.001). 3.Total Basemen Crack Length(Xcrac )is based on the approximate total floor/wall seam perimeter distance of the proposed building(Senior Center). 4. Length of Air Pathway from Slab Bott)m to Ground Surface (Zcrack)is approximately 0.7 meters based on the assumption that the slab would be constructed 0.5 below the grade and he thickness of the slab is 20 cm. 5. Pressure Differ nce(Source to Indoor Air) is assumed to be 1 Pa= 1 E-05 atm(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). 6. Soil Intrinsic Permeability for this site with fine to coarse sand and some fine to medium gravel is assumed to be 1.0E-07 cm2. from Johnson 8 Ettinger, 1991 table ior fine to medium sand. 7.Vapor Dynamic Viscosity was assumed to be 1.8E-04 g/cm-s(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\ 4Jobs\04.0024926.01 fo er Sylvania Salem AULNI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor A.XLS\QSOIL TABLE 137-B File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF SOIL GAS INTO THE BUILDING NEAR B102-OW Page 1 of 1 10/1412009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Length of Foundation Basement Total Radius of Air Pathway from Pressure Difference Vapor Volumetric Flow Soil Contact Crack Basement Basement Slab Bottom to Source to Indoor Airs Soil Intrinsic Dynamic Rate of Soil Gas Area' Acr/Ab2 Area Crack Length Crack Ground Surface4 1 Pa= 10 g/cm-s2 Permeabilitye Viscosity into Building (mZ) W) (m) (cm) (m) (Pa) (cmz) (g/cm-s) (cm'/s) Ab n Acrac Xcrack r cr Zcrack dP k v u Osoil 2,324 0.001 2.32 244 0.5 0.70 1 1.0E-07 1.8E-04 171 Notes: 1. Foundation Soil Contact Area(Ab)is based on approximate area exposed to soil,i.e.,the footprint of the proposed building(Senior Center). 2. n=Acrack/Ab, ere Acrack=crack area(assumed to be 0.001). 3.Total Basement Crack Length(Xcrack)is based on the approximate total floor/wall seam perimeter distance of the proposed building(Senior Center). 4. Length of Air Pathway from Slab Bottom to Ground Surface (Zcrack)is approximately 0.7 meters based on the assumption that the slab would be constructed 0.5 below the grade and I he thickness of the slab is 20 cm. 5. Pressure Differ nce(Source to Indoo Air)is assumed to be 1 Pa= 1 E-05 atm(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). 6.Soil Intrinsic Permeability for this site with fine to coarse sand and some fine to medium gravel is assumed to be 1.0E-07 cmZ. from Johnson& Ettinger, 1991 table f r fine to medium sand. 7.Vapor Dynamic Viscosity was assumed to be 1.8E-04 g/cm-s(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). J CIA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\j bs\04Jobs\04.0024926.0 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor B.XLS\QSOIL TABLE B-7C File No.24926.01 CALCULfkTION OF VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF SOIL GAS INTO THE BUILDING NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Length of Foundation Basement Total Radius of Air Pathway from Pressure Difference Vapor Volumetric Flow Soil Contact Crack Basement Basement Slab Bottom to Source to Indoor Airs Soil Intrinsic Dynamic Rate of Soil Gas Area cr/Ab2 Area Crack Length Crack Ground Surface4 1 Pa= 10 g/cm-s2 Permeabilitye Viscosity' into Building (m2) (m2) (m) (cm) (m) (Pa) (cm2) (g/cm-s) (cm'/s) Alb n Acrac Xcrack r cr Zcrack dP k v u Osoll 1,394 0.001 1.39 151 0.5 0.70 1 1.0E-07 1.8E-04 105 Notes: 1. Foundation Soil Contact Area(Ab)is ased on approximate area exposed to soil,i.e.,the footprint of the proposed building(Health Club). 2.n=Acrack/Ab,where Acrack=crack a ea(assumed to be 0.001). 3.Total Crack Leni 3th(Xcrack)is based on the approximate total floortwall seam perimeter distance of the proposed building(Health Club). 4. Length of Air Pa hway from Slab Boftc im to Ground Surface (Zcrack)is approximately 0.7 meters based on the assumption that the slab would be constructed 0.5 3elow the grade and a thickness of the slab is 20 cm. 5. Pressure Differ nce(Source to Indoor Air)is assumed to be 1 Pa= 1E-05 atm(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). 6. Soil Intrinsic Pe meability for this Site With fine to coarse sand and some fine to medium gravel is assumed to be 1.0E-07 cmZ. from Johnson&Ettinger, 1991 table for fine to medium sand. 7.Vapor Dynamic Viscosity was assum d to be 1.8E-04 g/cm-s(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\j bs\04Jobs\04.0024926.0 former Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor C.XLS\QSOIL • 0 TABLE B48A Fie No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF CONTAMINANT-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 Fortner OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. a14r1oo9 a 80 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Basement Distance from Effective Vapor- Attenuation "Overall"Effectiv Foundation or Building Contaminant Volumetric Flow Pressure Diffusion Basement Advective Diffusion factor= Porous Media Soil Contact Ventilation Source to Rate of Soil Gas Foundation Coefficient Through Crack Dominated Constant Dominated QsoiVQbuilding Cbuidling/ Diffusion Coeff. Area Rate' Foundation into Building Thic nessa the Crack Acr/Ab Area =Effective Pedet Constant Csource (cm,/5) (m') (an'/s) (an) (cm'/s) (an) (an'/s) (ml Number Dt Ab Obuilding Lt 08011 Lcrack Dcrack n Acrack A B C sighs s-1,2-0ichloroethene 1.19E-02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.19E-02 0.001 2.324 12.34 3.80E-04 1.03E-05 1.00E-05 Toluene 1.41E-02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.41E-02 0.001 2.324 10.44 4.28E-04 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 richloroethene 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.28E-02 0.001 2.324 11.50 3.87E-04 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 Vinyl Chloride 1.71E-02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.71E-02 0.001 2324 8.57 5.19E-04 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 Notes: 1.Building ventilation rate(Qbuilding)is based on the approximate volume of one floor of the proposed building(Senior Center)assuming a 14 foot ceiling and six air change per hour. 2.Distance from Contamiy iant Source to Foundation(Lt)is b 3sed on the groundwater depth and the slab characteristics(i.e.,50 an below grade and 20 cm thick). 3.Foundation Thickness(.crack)is thickness of slab which i s assumed to be 8 inches or 20 art. oA cLl7ate:10/12J09 \\GzanevmiarketYobe\04Jo 04.0024926.01 farmer Sylvania Salem UWA Evaluation 200924926.01 Attenuation Factor_A.XLS%MAIN TABLE 946 Fie No.24926.01 Page 1 0f 1 CALCULATION OF CONTAMINANT-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS NEAR B102-OW 1a14noo9 Fortner OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Basement Distance from Effective Vapor- Attenuation "Overall"Effective Foundation or Building Contaminant Volumetric Flow Pressure Diffusion Basement Advective Diffusion factor= Porous Media Soil Contact Ventilation Souroe to Rate of Soil Gas Foundation Coefficient Through Crack Dominated Constant Dominated QsoiVQbuilkfmg Cbuidling/ Diffusion Coeff. Area Rate' Foundation into Building Thickness" the Crack Acr/Ab Area =Effective Peclet Constant Csource (cm'/s) (me) (cm,19) (cm) (cm'/s) (cm) (cm'/s) (W) Number Dt Ab Obuildling Lt Qsoil Lcraak Dcrack n Acrack A B C at ha 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.26E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.26E-02 0.001 2.324 8.73 8.51E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 1,1-Dichloroethans 1.20E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.20E-02 0.001 2.324 9.18 8:09E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Benzene 1.42E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.42E-02 0.001 2.324 7.74 9.60E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.19E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.19E-02 0.001 2.324 9.26 8.03E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Ethylbenzene 1.21E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.21E-02 0.001 2.324 9.08 8.18E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Naphthalene 9.54E-03 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 9.54E-03 0.001 2.324 11.55 6.44E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 oluene 1.41E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.41E-02 0.001 2.324 7.83 9.49E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 richloroethene 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 2.324 8.82 8.62E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 ylene(Total) 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 2.324 8.62 8.82E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 4 Methylphenol 1.17E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.17E-02 0.001 2.324 1.1 7:90E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Benzoic acid 9.85E-03 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 9.85E-03 0.001 2.324 11.19 8.84E 04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Phenol 1.35E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.35E-02 0.001 2.324 8A7 9.10E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 C11-C22 Aromatic Frakttio 9.70E-03 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 9.70E-03 0.001 2.324 11.35 6.55E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.29E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.29E-02 0.001 2.324 8.52 8.73E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1.13E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.13E-02 0.001 2.324 9.73 7.64E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Zinc NA 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 NA 0.001 2.324 NA NA NA NA Notes: 1.Building ventilation rate Qbuilding)is based on the apprm(mate volume of one floor of the proposed building(Senior Center)assuming a 14 foot ceiling and six air change per hour. 2.Distance from Contamin ant Source to Foundation(Lt)is b sed on the groundwater depth and the slab characteristics(i.e.,50 cm below grade and 20 Cm thick). 3.Foundation Thickness(L crack)is thickness of slab which i 9 assumed to be 6 inches or 15 cm. dA:CL Date:1011ZW %%Gzanewmarkettiobe%Wo 04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem kULXV1 Evaluation 2009124926.01 Attenuation Factor_8.XLSkMAIN TABLE B-SC Fie No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF CONTAMINANT-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 Fortner OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc, 10f1CM 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Basement Distance from Effective Vapor- Attenuation "Overair Effective Foundation or Building Contaminant Volumetric Flow Pressure Diffusion Basement Advective Diffusion factor= Porous Media Soil Contact Ventilation Source to Rate of Soil Gas Foundation Coefficient Through Crack Dominated Constant Dominated QsoiUQbuilding Cbuidling/ Diffusion Coeff. Area Rate' Foundatiortz into Building Thickness' the Crack Acr/Ab Area =Effective Pedal Constant Csource (cm'/s) W) (an'/s) (cm) (an'/s) (cm) (cmvs) (ml) Number Dt Ab ObutldlEq Lt 08011 Lcrack Dcrack n Acrack A B C at ha 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.28E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 1.394 8.97 8.51E-04 1.08E-05 1.05E-05 richioroethene 1.28E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 1.394 8.85 8.82E-04 1.08E-05 1.05E-05 4-Methylphenol 1.17E-02 1394 9.gE+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.17E-02 0.001 1.394 9.66 7.90E-04 1.08E-05 1.05E-05 Benzoic add 9.85E-03 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 9.85E-03 0.001 1.394 11.48 8.84E-04 1.08E-05 1.04E-05 Phenol 1.35E.02 1394 9.9E+08 21 1.1E+02 15 1.35E-02 0.001 1.394 8.39 9.10E-04 1.08E-05 1.05E-05 C11-C22 Aromatic Fracdo 9.70E-03 1394 9.9E+08 21 1.1E+02 15 9.70E.03 0.001 1.394 11.66 8.55E-04 1.08E-05 1.04E-05 C5 C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.29E-02 1394 9.9E+08 21 1.1E+02 15 129E-02 0.001 1.394 8.74 8.73E-04 1.06E-05 1.05E-05 C9-018 Aliphatic Fraction 1.13E-02 1394 9.9E+08 21 1.1E+02 15 1.13E-02 0.001 1.394 9.99 7.64E-04 1.06E.05 1.05E-05 Notes: 1.Building ventilation rate:Qbuilding)is based on the app imate volume of one Boor of the proposed building(Health Club)assuming a 14 foot ceiling and six air change per hour. 2.Distance from Contamir ant Source to Foundation(Lt)is b sed on the groundwater depth and the slab characteristics(i.e.,50 cm below grade and 20 cm thick). 3.Foundation Thickness( crack)is thickness of slab which is assumed to be 6 inches or 15 aft. QA CL Date:10112/09 %%Gzam vmiarkeNobsk04Jo 104.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem UL\VI Evaluation 2009124926.01 Attenuation Factor C.xL31MAIN TABLE B-9 File No.24926.01 Page 1 of 1 FACILITY WORKER EXPOSURE PROFILE 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Equations Used to Calculate Average Daily Exposure(ADE)and Lifetime Average Daily Exposure(LADE) EXPOSURE PATHWAY:Inhalation of Vapors in Indoor Air EPCaR-EF"ED-EP-C2-C5 ADE;n�a;r= Equation 7 APnc EPCair-E -ED-EP-C2 LADE;nd.a;r= Equation 8 APc Receptor-Specific Values Parameter efinition Units (ages>18 ears Rationale/Reference ADEindair verage Daily Exposure mg/m3 Calculated Equation 7 LADEindair ifetime Average Daily Exposure pg/m' Calculated Equation 8 EPCam xposure Point Concentration in Air Ng/m' TABLE B-4 modeled from groundwater concentrations EF xposure Frequency events/year 250 Five days per week for 50 weeks(assuming 2 weeks vacation) ED xposure Duration hours/event 8 MADEP, 1992;Table 8-26 EP xposure Period years 15.1 Longest median employer tenure, Farber 1995. C2 onversion factor for ur its days/hr 0.0417 Constant C5 onversion factor for ur its mg/Ng 0.001 Constant APnc veraging Period, non- ncer days 5,512 equals EP-365 days/year AP, veraging Period,cancer days 27,375 equals average lifetime,75 years*365 days/year Abbreviations: MADEP=Massachusetts Department 3f Environmental Protection; NA=Not Applicable. %%Gzanewmarkefljobs\0 obs\04.0024M.01 former Sylvai is Salem AUL%VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(M).AsTarameters OA:CL hate:10/12/09 TABLE B-10 File No.2 1 Pagee I of of 1 CHILD USER EXPOSURE PROFILE 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Equat ons Used to Calculate Average Daily Exposure(ADE)and Lifetime Average Daily Exposure(LADE) EXPOSURE PA HWAY:Inhalation of Vapors in Indoor Air EPCa;r*EF'ED*EP*C2*C5 ADE;nd.a;r= Equation 1 APnc EPCa;r*E *ED*EP*C2 LADE;nd-air= AP Equation 2 e Receptor-Specific Values Parameter Definition Units (ages 2-18 rs Rationale/Reference ADE,ndair verage Daily Exposur mg/m3 Calculated Equation 1 LADE;nd..a;r ifetime Average Daily posure Ng/m' Calculated Equation 2 EPCa;r Hzxposure Point Concer tration in Air pg/m' TABLE B-4 modeled from groundwater concentrations EF xposure Frequency events/year 250 Five days per week for 50 weeks ED ixposure Duration hours/event 4 MADEP, 1992;Table 8-26 EP xposure Period years 16 Interval for age group C2 onversion factor for units days/hr 0.0417 Constant C5 conversion factor for ur iits mg/Ng 0.001 Constant APnc veraging Period, non-cancer days 5,840 equals EP*365 days/year APB Averaging Period,cancer days 27,375 equals average lifetime,75 years'365 days/year Abbreviations: MADEP=Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection; NA=Not Applicable. \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\ obs\04.0024926.01 former Sytva iia Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(Chid Users)AMParameters OA:CL Bate:10/12/09 TABLE B41 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF DOSE-RESPONSE INFORMATION-NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS-INHALATION Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Inhalation Inhalation Subchronic Chronic Chronic Target Critical Study Study COC Reference Reference Inhalation Organ/System Effect Animal Method Concentration Concentration RfC m !m' m m' OF x MF 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.2 d 5.2 t 1,1-Dichloroethane 5 b 0.5 b 100;1000 kidney toxicity cat inhalation Benzene 0.09 1 0.03 a 300 x 1 blood decreased lymphocyte count human inhalation cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.035 d 0.035 x Ethylbenzene 1 d 1 a 300 x 1 fetus developmental toxicity rattrabbit inhalation Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 3 d 3 a 100 x 1 liver,kidney renal lesions increased organ weight rat inhalation Naphthalene 0.003 d 0.003 a 3000 x 1 respiratory system hyperplasia and metaplasia in epithelium mouse inhalation oluene 5 d 5 a CNS neurological effects humans Inhalation-occupat. Trichloroethene 0.18 d 0.18 a CNS,liver,endocrine systems critical effects inyl Chloride 0.1 d 0.1 a 30 x 1 liver liver cell polymorphism rat feeding study ylene(Total) 0.3 1 0.1 a 300 x 1 CNS impaired motor coordination rat inhalation Methylphenol 0.12 d 0.12 e Benzoic acid Phenol 0.26 d 0.26 e C11-C22 Aromatic Fractio 0.5 c 0.05 g C19-C36 Aliphatic Fractio C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 0.2 d 0.2 g C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 0.5 c 0.05 g C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 0.6 c 0.2 g rsenic 0.0000025 d 0.0000025 e Chromium(total) 0.0003 i 0.0001 1 Nickel 0.001 d 0.001 e Zinc 0.0014 d 0.0014 i Hierarchy of Sources: a. US EPA integrated Risk Information System(IRIS), ttp://www.epa.gov/IRIS,October,2009. b. US EPA,Health Effect Summary Tables(HEAST),Dffice of Solid Waste and Emergency Response/Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Annual FY 1997. c. MassDEP 2008.(MCP To)icity.rds).Value withdrawr from HEAST was used based on value listed in MassDEP Toxicity.rds. d. Chronic RfC has been used here as subchronic RfC as a conservative step. e. Allowable Threshold C ncentration(ATC)calculate following Chemical Health Effects Assessment Methodology and the Method to Derive Allowable Ambient Limits(CHEM/AAL).ORS Report 90-1.ATC=5 x TEL. TELs listed in MassDEP,December 1995. g. MassDEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleun i Contaminated Sites:Implementation of the MassDEP VPH/EPH Approach,Final Policy(#WSC-02-41 1).Table 4-13.October 2002. I. MassDEP 2008.Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater.(MCP Toxicity.)is) t MassDEP 2008.(MCP oxicity.xls).Value consisten with approach presented in"Updated Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction To Values for the VPH/EPH/APH Methodology'MassDEP 2003 and"Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum ContaminatedSites"MassDE x. MassDEP 2008.(MCP Toxicity.)ls).MassDEP apprc ach to convert oral RfD to RfC using RfC(mg/m3)_(RfD(mg/kg-day) Body Weight(70 kg))/Ventilation Rate(20 m3/day) Notes: 1. A blank space indicates no data found. Abbreviations: CNS=Central nervous s stem;COC=Constituent ofconcern;MF=Modifying Factor;RfC=Reference Concentration;OF=Uncertainty Factor. QA:CL Date:10112109 %NGzanewmarketljobs obs%04.0024926.01 fomrer Sylvan' Salem AULM Evaluation 2009%24926.01 Chem InfoxlsORNG TABLE B-12 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF DOSE-RESPONSE INFORMATION-CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 1 0/1 412 0 0 9 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Oral Weight Cancer Target Study Study Inhalation Target Study Study COC of Slope Organ/System Animal Method Unit Organ/System Animal Method Evidence Factor (oral) Risk (Inhalation) Class (mg/kg/day)'' (Yg/my 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane D a 1,1-Dichloroethane C a Benzene A a 5.5E-02 a blood human Inhalation 7.8E-6 a blood human inhalation cis 1,2-Dichloroethene D a Ethylbenzene D a Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether Naphthalene C a oluene D a richloroethene C-62 a 1.1E-02 c 1.7E-6 C 8.8E-6 Qifetime exposure from birth) .4(lifetime exposure from birth) 4.4E-6 Qifetime exposure through nyl Chloride A a 0.72 lifetime exposure through adulthood) a liver rat oral-diet adulthood) a liver rat inhalation ylene(Total) D a Methylphenol C a Benzoic add D a Phenol D a C11-C22 Aromatic Fracti n C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fractio C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fractio nic A a 1.5E+00 a skin human oral water 4.3E-3 a lung human Inhalation-occupst. Chromium(total) D a 1.2E-2 a lung human occupational exposure(Inhalation) Nickel 4.8E-4 a nc D a Hierarchy of Sources: a. US EPA Integrated Risk Information System(IRIS),h p:/A~.epa.gov/IRIS,October,2009. c. MassDEP 2008(MC Toxicity.x1s).This value has been withdrawn from HEAST,although many consultants may continue to use it,lacking any new information. Consult HEAST for any additional information. e.MassDEP 2008(MCP To)ddty.xis).This Cancer Slopc Factor or Unit Risk was taken from a fact sheet distributed by the U.S.EPA Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center at ECAO-Cincinnati,current as of September 2,1992. Notes: 1. Weight of evidence ssific+A: Human carcinogen C: Possible human carcinogen B: Probable human cardinogen D: Not classified 81: Limited eviderKA of carcinogenicity in humans from epidemiological studies E: No evidence of Carcinogenicity 82: Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity In animals,inadequate evidence in humans 2. Inhalation unit risk is Jefined as the risk per concentration unit in air,e.g.risk per pg/m'. 3. Blank space indicates no data available. Abbreviations: COC=constituent of co icern. %%Granex dcetgobs\00.10 104.00249M.01 Bonner Sylvenle Sat AULM Evetua0on 2009124929.01 Chen InfoxMDRC GA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-13A File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 10/14/2009 • FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air ADEir,�;,= EPC;,,�ai,*EF*ED'EP*C2"C5 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC AP„, Descriptions HQirw-air= ADEin"ir Hlindair= E HQ RfC "'�i`COC EPCindair ADEind it RfC HQind-air EPC2A Chronic (Ng/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 1.1 E-02 3.5E-02 3.1 E-01 Toluene 2.3E-01 5.2E-05 5.0E+00 1.0E-05 Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 1.7E-02 1.8E-01 9.7E-02 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 6.8E-03 1.0E-01 6.8E-02 Hlirw-air:11 5E-01 Notes: • 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • UGzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\indoor MANdb-0atacM./PPJ09 TABLE B-13A(Continued) File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 • FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of oor Air LADEird.air= EPCird.,ir*EF*ED*EP*C2 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC AP, Descriptions ELCRird_.ir= LADEird.8ir*UR Total ELCRi - F, ELCR md-air— urd-air COC EPCird"Q LADEird.,air UR ELCRird�ir EPC2A (pg/m) (Ng/m) (Ng/m) unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 2.2E+00 NA NC Toluene 2.3E-01 1.0E-02 NA NC Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 3.5E+00 1.7E-06 6.0E-06 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 1.4E+00 4.4E-06 6.1 E-06 Total ELCRird_ir: 1 E-05 • Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA= Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUMA Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FV1)AMIndoor AQAMbdW§A10/12/09 I TABLE B-13B File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 10/14/2008 • FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B102-OW Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of Indoor Air See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and ADEind-air= EPCind-air-EF-ED'EP-C2*C5 Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APnc Descriptions HQindair= ADEindair Hlindair= HQ RfC mdair COC EPCin"ir ADEind air RfC HQindair EPC2B Chronic (Ng/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/rn ) unitless 1,1,1-Trcchloroethane 3.3E+01 7.5E-03 5.2E+00 1.4E-03 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.1E+00 4.9E-04 5.0E-01 9.7E-04 Benzene 5.8E-03 1.3E-06 3.0E-02 4.4E-05 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.6E-01 1.3E-04 3.5E-02 3.7E-03 EthY(benzene 2.0E-03 4.5E-07 1.0E+00 4.5E-07 Naphthalene 4.4E-0 4 1.0E-07 3.0E-03 3.3E-05 Toluene 4.4E-02 1.0E-05 5.0E+00 2.0E-06 Trichloroethene 8.2E+00 1.9E-03 1.8E-01 1.0E-02 Xylene(Total) 1.2E-02 2.8E-06 1.0E-01 2.8E-05 4-Methylphenol 2.1 E-06 4.8E-10 1.2E-01 4.0E-09 Benzoic acid 1.7E-07 4.0E-11 NA NC • Phenol 7.8E-07 1.8E-10 2.6E-01 6.8E-10 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.5E+02 3.5E-02 2.0E-01 1.7E-01 C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 6.6E-03 1.5E-06 5.0E-02 3.0E-05 C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction 4.5E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-01 5.1E-03 Hlind-air 2E-01 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarketyobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\lndoor Air(Non-CdMei;bWate:10/12/09 TABLE B-13B(Continued) File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2of2 • FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B102-OW 10n4n009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of Iniloor Air LADEind-air= EPCin",r-EF"ED-EP*C2 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC AP, Descriptions ELCRind.ir= LADEind air*UR _ Total ELCRind-air- E ELCRindair COC EPCind-air LADEind-air UR ELCRind-ir EPC26 (Ng/m3) (Ng/m3) (Ng/m)-1 unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.3E+01 1.5E+00 NA NC 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.1E+00 9.8E-02 NA NC Benzene 5.8E-03 2.7E-04 7.8E-06 2.1E-09 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.6E-01 2.6E-02 NA NC Ethylbenzene 2.0E-03 9.1 E-05 NA NC Naphthalene 4.4E-04 2.0E-05 NA NC Toluene 4.4E-02 2.0E-03 NA NC Trichloroethene 8.2E+00 3.8E-01 1.7E-06 6.4E-07 Xylene(Total) 1.2E-02 5.6E-04 NA NC 4-Methylphenol 2.1 E-06 9.6E-08 NA NC • Benzoic acid 1.7E-07 8.0E-09 NA NC Phenol 7.8E-07 3.6E-08 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.5E+02 7.0E+00 NA NC C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 6.6E-03 3.0E-04 NA NC C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction 4.5E+00 2.1 E-01 NA NC Total ELCRin"ir: 6E-07 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarketyobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AULWI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xlsUndoor Air(Canoerq&CL Date:10M2109 TABLE B-13C File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B105-OW 10/14/2009 • Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air ADEir�v= EPCinr�y*EF*ED*EP*C2*C5 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APnc Descriptions HQind-a'c= ADEind-air RfC Hlind-air HQind-air L COC EPCin"ir ADEi,"v RfC HQind-air EPC2C Chronic (Ng/m) (mg/m) (mg/m3) unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.6E+01 5.9E-03 5.2E+00 1.1E-03 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.3E-03 1.2E-06 5.0E-01 2.4E-06 Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 6.3E-04 1.4E-07 3.0E+00 4.8E-08 Trichloroethene 8.9E+00 2.0E-03 1.8E-01 1.1 E-02 4-Methylphenol 2.4E-06 5.5E-10 1.2E-01 4.6E-09 Benzoic acid 2.1 E-07 4.8E-11 NA NC Phenol 8.0E-07 1.8E-10 2.6E-01 7.0E-10 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 2.2E-02 4.9E-06 5.0E-02 9.8E-05 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 3.2E+01 7.4E-03 2.0E-01 3.7E-02 • C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 2.0E+01 4.5E-03 2.0E-01 2.3E-02 Hlind-air 7E-02 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC= Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01-former Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\lndoor WNbb-Datw"(2/09 TABLE B-13C(Continued) File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR 6105-OW 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVAN IA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts RECEPTOR_ Facility Workers CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air LADE;ndair= EPCind-wr-EF"ED*EP-C2 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APB Descriptions ELCR;, v= LADE; dair"UR Total ELCR mdair- F. ELCR;,";, COC EPC;,,d_.;, LADE;rd,.p UR ELCR;,,d-air EPC2C (Ng/m3) (Ng/m) (Ng/m3)-' unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.6E+01 1.2E+00 NA NC 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.3E-03 2.4E-04 NA NC Methyl-Tent-Butyl-Ether 6.3E-04 2.9E-05 NA NC Trichloroethene 8.9E+00 4.1E-01 1.7E-06 6.9E-07 4-Methylphenol 2.4E-06 1.1E-07 NA NC Benzoic acid 2.1 E-07 9.7E-09 NA NC Phenol 8.0E-07 3.7E-08 NA NC C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 2.2E-02 9.9E-04 NA NC • C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 3.2E+01 1.5E+00 NA NC C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 2.0E+01 9.1 E-01 NA NC Total ELCRiw;,: 7E-07 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. \\Gzanewmarketyobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AULWI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(M).xls\Indoor/C MbdW.eC10/12/09 TABLE B-14 File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 10/14/2009 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts CHILD USERS CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air ADEir air= EPCind,ir*EF*ED*EP*C2*C5 See TABLE B-10 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APnc Descriptions HQind-air= ADEind-air - RfC Hlind-air— HQ md-a'v COC EPCind it ADEinci air RfC HClirwair EPC2A Chronic (Ng/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 5.4E-03 3.5E-02 1.5E-01 Toluene 2.3E-01 2.6E-05 5.0E+00 5.2E-06 Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 8.7E-03 1.8E-01 4.8E-02 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 3.4E-03 1.0E-01 3.4E-02 Hli,w.a;r: 2E-01 Notes: • 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available;NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(Child Users).xls\Indoor Air(Non- Canoer)A CIA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-14(Continued) File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E 10i14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts CHILD USERS CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air LADEi�ir= EPCi�;r"EF"ED*EP*C2 See TABLE B-10 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APB Descriptions ELCRirdir= LADEirdir"UR Total ELCRjind-air- ELCRi„"j, — COC EPC;nd-air LADEvd-air UR ELCRir,"ir EPC2A (Ng/m3) (pg/m) (Ng/m)-' unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 1.2E+00 NA NC Toluene 2.3E-01 5.5E-03 NA NC Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 1.9E+00 1.7E-06 3.2E-06 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 7.3E-01 8.8E-06 6.4E706 Total ELCRi„d.ap: 1E-05 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available;NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(Child Users).xls\0Ao6LQa(ftW J-W TABLE B-15 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF TOTAL HAZARD INDICES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 1 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Excess Receptor Exposure Media/Route Non-Cancer Lifetime Hazard Index Cancer Risk Chronic HI Driver Estimate Driver RECEPTOR: Facility Workers Inha ation of Indoor Air(GZ-E) 0.5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 E-05 Vinyl Chloride Inha ation of Indoor Air(6102-OW) 0.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic 6E-07 Trichloroethene Inhalation of Indoor Air(13105-OW) 0.07 C5-08 Aliphatic 7E-07 Trichloroethene MAXIMUM for RECEPTOR: Facility Workers: 0.5 1E-05 MCP Risk Limits: 1 1E-05 Exceed MCP Risk Limits? NO NO RECEPTOR Child Users Inh lation of Indoor Air(GZ-E) 0.2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 E-05 Vinyl Chloride Total for RECEPTOR: Child Users: 0.2 1E-05 MCP Risk Limits: 1 1E-05 Exceed MCP Risk Limits? NO NO i I i i Abbreviations: MCP=Maw achusetts Contingency Plan. I i \\Gzanewmarket'obs\04Jobs\04.0024926. 1 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Summary.xls\SUM RISK GA:CL Date:10/12/09 0 0 0 Information Regarding the Senior Center Site Email dated May 12, 2010 from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to City Solicitor Beth Rennard Beth, At the April Board of Health meeting the Board approved the development of the Senior Center project. During last nights meeting a couple of residents came and brought some new information they felt was not brought to the Boards attention during the April meeting. The Board would like to know since they have already approved this project can they go back and review this new information or is the time for review passed. Any information you can provide is greatly appreciated. David Email dated May 12, 2010 from Beverlie McSwiggin regarding information on the Senior Center Site David • Would you please forward this to Doctor Poremba Click here: http://public.dep.state.ma.us/fileviewer/Default.aspx?fo mdataid=O&documentid=59472 BevePlle McSwiggin Beverlie McSwiggin 978-979-2784 Email from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to the Board of Health forwarding the above information Good Morning All, Below is a link to some of the documentation that was brought to the attention of the Board at the meeting last night. I will forward any further information as I receive it. David David J. Greenbaum,Acting Health Agent 120 Washington Street,4th Floor Salem,MA 01970 Phone 978-741-1800 Fax 978-745-0343 • • Email dated May 13, 2010 from City Solicitor Beth Rennard to Planning Director Lynn Duncan regarding the Senior Center Got a call from the board of health chair. Sr. center was before them and got approved. Now someone (Teasie) comes in and says there are going to be children at the center and that is not allowed by the AUL. Can you let me know your thoughts on this? Thank you. Elizabeth Rennard, Esq. City Solicitor City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 978-619-5633 978-744-9327 (fax) Email dated May 13, 2010 from Planning Director Lynn Duncan to Danielle McKnight Staff Planner in response to the above email Do we have a copy of the AUL for the Gateway Center site? Lynn Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP Director Department of Planning & Community Development City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 T: 978-619-5685 F. 978-740-0404 • • Email dated May 13, 2010 from Danielle McKnight Staff Planner to Lynn Duncan Planning Director in response to above email This is the risk assessment memo that was provided by GZA as an update to the old AUL. As to use by children, it says "The LSP Opinion prohibits use of the Site as a residence or a full-time day care center or children's school where children are present for a full school day for the entire school week (5 days per week, 6 hours per day)." But it doesn't prohibit them altogether. Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 (978) 619-5685 • dmcknight _salem.com Email dated May 13, 2010 from Planning Director Lynn Duncan to City Solicitor Beth Rennard regarding the risk assessment memo for the senior center site Hi Beth, This is the risk assessment memo that was provided by GZA as an update to the old AUL. See page 3 regarding use by children, where it states, "The LSP Opinion prohibits use of the Site as a residence or a full-time day care center or children's school where children are present for a full school day for the entire school week (5 days per week, 6 hours per day)." But it does not prohibit them altogether. Lynn Lynn Goonin Duncan, AICP Director Department of Planning & Community Development • City of Salem 120 Washington Street r Salem, MA 01970 T: 978-619-5685 F. 978-740-0404 Email dated May 14, 2010 from Board of Health Chair, Barbara Poremba to the Board of Health regarding information received from City Solicitor Beth Rennard (Exhibit A) FYI, This is what I received from Beth Rennard. Have a nice weekend! Barb Email from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to Board of Health Chair, Barbara Poremba regarding the information sent from Beth Rennard Barbara, • Just an FYI, the link I forwarded to the Board on Wednesday contained the same information. Also, I happened to speak to Councillor Pinto on another matter last week and mentioned to him the request of the woman at the meeting on Tuesday. He said that the LSP for the Senior Center has answered all of the concerns that were raised by the woman at the meeting. The majority of the City Council voted to approve this project and he feels as if this woman is clutching at straws. I read the report and feel that all the concerns have been adequately addressed in the report. I did inquire of Beth if the Board has the ability to re-visit a project and have not heard back. I was wondering if you had heard anything. I just wanted to keep you up to date on the information I have. Have a nice day. David David J.Greenbaum,Acting Health Agent 120 Washington Street, 4th Floor Salem, NIA 01970 Phone 978-741-1800 Fax 978-745-0343 • Email dated May 17, 2010 from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to the Board of Health Good Afternoon, Below is an email that was sent to the City Clerk and Janet last March regarding the new Senior Center/Community Life Center. This was sent from Patricia Donahue at Mass DEP and the email the Ms. Zebcar was referencing at the meeting last week. Pat Donahue is going to check the status of this with the person working on this site tomorrow and get back to me. I will update you with the status as soon as I have the information. David Email dated March _1.7, 2009 from Patricia Donahue of MA DEP to then Acting Health Agent Janet Mancini and City Clerk Cheryl Lapointe To Whom It May Concern: I am writing because I have received several inquiries regarding a proposed development in Salem located at 60 Boston Street. This location is a former manufacturing site, most recently used by OSRAM Sylvania. The site has achieved closure under state regulations, however, a deed notice or Activity and Use Limitation • (AUL) is in place to restrict certain activities and uses. One of the restrictions under section 2V, is "Use of the Site as a residence, school, day care facility, nursery, playground, recreational area or similar use where a child is likely to be present on a regular basis." It is my understanding that this restriction is in place because those types of uses were not evaluated in the Risk Characterization. A portion of the proposed building is being considered by the City to house a new Senior Center/Community Life Center. While the Senior Center may be the primary use, it appears that a number of other community programs may also be based in the building, including programs for children. The deed notice or AUL would allow for adult only programs, along with commercial/industrial use, but would not allow for children's programs or presence on a regular basis. Therefore, to allow for children's programs to occur and to be in compliance with state requirements, use by children would need to be evaluated and the AUL amended as appropriate. The evaluation and AUL amendment can be done by a Licensed Site Professional. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any clarification or questions regarding this matter. Thank you. • • Email dated May 19, 2010 from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to the Board of Health regarding conversation with Assistant City Solicitor Jerry Parisella regarding the Board re-opening deliberations on the Senior Center project Good Afternoon Everyone, I spoke to Jerry Parisella, Assistant City Solicitor regarding the Senior Center discussion that took place at the meeting with the Teasie Goggin and Joan Zabcar. He felt that there were a couple of issues with allowing them to speak about this matter. First, this was an item that was not on the agenda and he feels that allowing them to speak on an item that was not on a posted agenda could be a violation of the open meeting law. Second, if the Board wanted to look at this project again then the Board would have to vote to re-open the deliberations of this project. If the Board voted to re-open the deliberations then the project would need to be re- posted on an agenda and addressed at another meeting, in other words the Board can't vote to re-open the deliberations and review the project at the same meeting. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this information please let me know. David Email dated May 20, 2010 from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to the Board of Health regarding a conversation with Pat Donahue of MA • DEP Good Afternoon All, I just spoke to Pat Donahue at the MA DEP regarding the Senior Center Site. She told me that DEP is working on drafting a letter to the developer/property owner regarding some of the assumptions made in the revised risk characterization that was sent out last week. DEP is going to be asking that additional testing be done within the foot print of the building to determine what the level of risk will be to children who use the building for Park & Recreation programs. The owner will have to amend the current AUL to allow for children to be present at the building. In addition the owner will have to submit a Release Abatement Measure Plan to DEP prior to construction of the building. Also DEP would require indoor air quality testing once the building is constructed to insure that there is no vapor intrusion and that all indoor testing should be done prior to the building being occupied. DEP is going to try to have the letter to the BOH before the meeting in June. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this information. David David J. Greenbaum, Acting Health Agent 120 Washington Street, 4th Floor Salem, MA 01970 Phone 978-741-1800 • Fax 978-745-0343 1 • Email Dated May 24, 2010 from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to the Board of Health regarding children's programs at the new Senior Center Site Good Morning All, Below is the current list of all children's programs that are offered at the Council on Aging building. Included are the dates and times the programs are offered. David BABY SIGNS PLAY CLASSES Date: Saturdays, Oct. 17 to Nov. 21, Feb. 6 to March 20(no class on Feb. 20), May 1 to June 12 (no class May 29) Time: 9 to 10 a.m. for beginners 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. for intermediates TUMBLEWEEDS Ages: 2-3 years Date: Thursdays for eight weeks. April 29 to June 17; Sept. 9 to Oct. 28, Nov. 12 to Jan. 21 (no class Nov. 26, Dec. 24 & Dec. 31), Feb. 4 to April 1 (no class Feb. 18), Time: 9 to 9:45 a.m. TUMBLE ROLLERS Age: 3-5 years • Date: Thursdays for eight weeks. April 29 to June 17; Sept. 9 to Oct. 28, Nov. 12 to Jan. 21 (no class Nov. 26, Dec. 24 & Dec. 31), Feb. 4 to April 1 (no class Feb. 18) Time. 10 to 10:45 a.m. ITSY BITSY YOGA Age: 21 months-4 years Date: Mondays, June 21 to Aug. 2 (no class July 5), Oct. 19 to Nov. 23 Time: 9 to 9:45 a.m. BABYSITTING COURSE Age: 12-15 years Date: Tuesday, April 20, Tuesday, February 16 Time: 9 a.m. to noon KNITTING WITH SENIORS Age: 6-12 years Date: April 20-23 (school vacation week),Tuesday-Friday, February 16 to 19 Time: 10 to 11:30 a.m. MYSTERIOUS MAYANS Age: 6-11 years Date: Thursdays, April 1, 8, 15, 22 &29 Time: 3:30 to 5 p.m. HIP-HOP DANCE LESSONS Age: 6-12 years Date: Tuesdays, starting July 6, for 6 weeks • Time: 6 to 7 p.m. for 6-to 8-year-olds; 7 to 8 p.m. for 9-to 12-year-olds. BOYS&GIRLS HIP HOP • Ages: 6-12 years Date: TBD, Please call in October Time: 5-6 p.m. ROCKIN' ROMANS Age: 6-10 years Date: Thursdays, Oct. 29 to Dec. 17 (no class Nov. 26) Time: 3:30-5 p.m. BACK TO THE FUTURE Age: 6-10 years Date: Thursdays, Jan. 14 to Feb. 25(no class Feb. 18) Time: 3:30-5 p.m. HEAT IT UP!VACATION PROGRAM Age: 6-10 years Date: Tuesday through Friday, Feb. 16 to 19 Time: 9 a.m. to noon CHESS Age: Kindergarten-grade 5 Date: Tuesdays, Feb. 23 to March 16 Time: 6-7 p.m. CHESS TOURNAMENT Age: Kindergarten-grade 5 • Date: Saturday, March 20 Time: 9 a.m. TEEN YOGA Age: 11-15 years Date: Thursdays, Oct. 22 to Nov. 12 Time: 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. RUBBER STAMPING Age: 10-15 years Date: Tuesday, April 20 Time: noon to 1:45 p.m. MAKE YOUR OWN IPOD HOLDER Age: 8-14 years Date: Wednesday, April 21 Time: 10 a.m. to noon PAPER DOLL WORKSHOP Age: 6-12 years Date: Thursday, April 22 Time: 10 a.m. to noon • T Email dated May 27, 2010 from Acting Health Agent David Greenbaum to the Board of Health forwarding an email from Danielle McKnight, Staff Planner regarding the Planning Board's final decision regarding the Senior Center (Exhibit B) Good Morning All, For your information I am forwarding the final Planning Board decision regarding the Senior Center project. David David J.Greenbaum,Acting Health Agent 120 Washington Street,4th Floor Salem,MA 01970 Phone 978-741-1800 Fax 978-745-0343 From: Danielle McKnight Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 1:45 PM To: David Knowlton; David Greenbaum; EGriffin; Thomas Stpierre; Frank Taormina Subject: Gateway Center (Boston/Bridge St.) decision FYI, the Planning Board voted on this on May 20—the decision is attached. Danielle McKnight Staff Planner Department of Planning and Community Development City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 (978) 619-5685 dmcknight(a--)salem.com • Phone Calls to the Board of Health regarding the Senior Center Project There have been no phone calls to the Board of Health office regarding the senior center project. Visits to the Board of Health Office regarding the Senior Center Project On or about April 14, 2010 Dr. Joan Zabcar came to the Board of Health office with concerns that the Board of Health did not receive all the pertinent information regarding the Senior Center project. She stated that the Board did not see a Risk Characterization or an Activities and Use Limitation (AUL) on the property. She stated that the original AUL stated there was to be no children on the site and that there were in fact going to be children's programs at the new senior center. I explained to her that the Board of Health had already reviewed and approved the project. I told her that if she would like to address the Board to let me know and to forward the documents in question to the Board of Health office and they would presented to the Board at the next meeting. She asked if the Board would revisit this project and I explained to her that I could not speak for the Board. What I would do is present them the information to them and then the Board would make a decision regarding whether or not to take another look at the project. Dr. Joan Zabcar visited the Board of Health office approximately 3-4 additional times after the Board of Health meeting on May 11, 2010. Each time she continued to talk • about the risk characterization and the AUL. She stated that she would be forwarding all the documentation to me for presentation to the Board. As of Monday, June 7, 2010 the only document that Dr. Joan Zabacar has presented is an email from Pat Donahue of the MA DEP to former Acting Health Agent, Janet Mancini and City Clerk Cheryl LaPointe dated March 17, 2009 that is presented above. All other documentation has been provided by other sources such as the City Solicitor. On or about Wednesday, June 1, 2010 Teasie Riley Goggin came to the Board of Health office to inquire about how to be placed on the agenda for the Board of Health meeting. I explained to her that she should send me something in writing requesting to be put on the agenda and I would add her to the agenda for the meeting. She asked if an email would suffice and I said that it would. She also asked if the Board would be discussing the Senior Center, I explained to her that the agenda was not set yet but I believed that there would probably be a discussion regarding the senior center project. As of posting the agenda on June 3, 2010 at 1:30PM no request to be added to the agenda had been received. There have been no other forms of communication with the Board of Health office regarding the senior center project. • Analysis of Park and Recreation Programs offered at the Senior Center Current Park and Recreation programs that are offered at the current Senior Center and will be offered at the new senior center site will be for children from 6 months to 15 years of age. The classes are offered in 6—8 week installments and last anywhere from 45 minutes to 3 hours. Programs that are offered in a 6-8 week installment are offered once a week during these times. The following programs are offered during school vacation weeks: • Knitting with seniors for children ages 6-12 from 10AM — 11:30AM for 4 days • Heat it Up! Vacation Program for children ages 6-10 from 9AM to Noon for 4 days All other programs are offered once a week. Based on the list of programs the following programs are offered only once per year: • Chess Tournament for children in Kindergarten to grade 5 • Rubber Stamping for children ages 10-15 • Make your Own IPOD Holder for children ages 8-14 • Paper Doll Workshop for children ages 6-12 • • • • Appendix . A i . GZA Engineers and GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Scientists VIA EMAIL November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 David Sweetser, Managing Member High Rock Bridge Street,LLC c/o High Rock Development,LLC 70 Walnut Street Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481 Re: Licensed Site Professional Opinion and Additional Risk Assessment 60 Bridge Street Salem,Massachusetts 202 Kent Place Newmarket, Dear Mr. Sweetser: New Hampshire 03857 p.603-659-3559 In accordance with your request, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has prepared this f.603-659-7750 www.gza.com additional Risk Assessment in support of a Licensed Site Professional (LSP) Opinion for • the subject property. This study has been completed in accordance with our executed agreement with High Rock Bridge Street, LLC, dated June 2, 2009. The contents of this report are subject to the Limitations contained in Appendix A. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF SERVICES GZA has completed a characterization of potential human health risks associated with exposures to indoor air potentially impacted by vapor intrusion at the 60 Boston Street Site (Site) located in Salem, Massachusetts. The Site is listed with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) under Release Tracking Numbers (RTN) 3-0016766. This risk characterization was prepared to support the LSP Opinion that changes the permitted uses in the Activity and Use Limitations (AUL) for the Site. The AUL was originally submitted on April 22, 1999 and amended on January 24, 2002. This additional Risk Assessment and LSP Opinion address the change of the Site use from the originally planned Osco Drug Store to the currently planned Senior Center and Health Club. GZA conducted the risk characterization in accordance with the requirements of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) and MassDEP Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization (MassDEP, 1995 and the subsequent updates). The cancer risks and non-cancer hazard indices for potential building occupants with exposure to indoor air potentially impacted by vapor intrusion at the Site do not exceed • the MCP non-cancer hazard target limit of 1 and the cancer target risk limit of 1x10-5. Therefore, the residual concentrations of contaminants in site groundwater pose no Copyright©2009 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FN/H r High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 2 • significant risks to potential human receptors due to vapor inhalation. The key components of any risk assessment are data, exposure, and toxicity. Components of each of these elements are summarized in this report. BACKGROUND A Method 3 risk characterization was submitted with the April 1999 Class A-3 Response Action Outcome (RAO) and AUL. The Method 3 risk characterization concluded that a condition of No Significant Risk, as defined by the MCP, existed with the AUL recorded at the Site. A pharmacy was planned to be built at the east side of the Site when the risk characterization was performed, and the Method 3 risk characterization evaluated potential risks to facility workers working in the proposed on-site building via inhalation of vapors .transported from groundwater into indoor air. The Method 3 risk characterization concluded that the use of the east side of the Site for commercial/retail building was allowed, provided a vapor barrier would be installed to prevent migration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into indoor air. Currently, use of the Site is proposed for a multiuse building consisting of a Community Life Center/ Senior Center, municipal and professional office space, atrium, Health Club and accessory spaces (Figure 1). The potential vapor intrusion pathway and potential risks to users of the newly proposed building have been evaluated and presented in this • risk assessment. The other potential exposure pathways at the Site were addressed in the previous Method 3 risk characterization, and the risk conclusions would still be valid for the Site. This additional Risk Assessment provides the technical support to an LSP Opinion clarifying the permitted usages at the Site. DATA USED IN RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND HAZARD IDENTIFICATION The groundwater data set used for this risk characterization is presented in Table B-1 and summarized in Table B-2.1 Groundwater data collected from the six monitoring wells located within 30 feet from the proposed buildings (i.e., GZ-B, GZ-E, B 102-OW, B 104-OW,B 105-OW, and B 106-OW) were used in this risk characterization. These data were collected in March and April 1996 and November 1997. The well locations are included on Figure 1,Site Plan. Constituents detected in the Site groundwater samples included 11 VOCs, 3 semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), 4 metals, extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH), and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH). All detected compounds were identified as constituents of concern (COCs) in groundwater and consequently included in this risk characterization. The COCs identified for the risk characterization are summarized in Table B-3. • ' A full set of the groundwater data available for the Site is presented in the 1999 RAO report. r High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 3 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Receptors Facility workers (i.e., staffs of the Senior Center or Health Club) working inside the proposed buildings and child users (ages 2-18 years old) were identified as the most sensitive populations that may be exposed to the potentially impacted indoor air at the Site, based on the current and reasonably foreseeable activities and uses. The LSP Opinion prohibits use of the Site as a residence or a full-time day care center or children's school where children are present for a full school day for the entire school week(5 days per week, 6 hours per day). Risk estimates were not calculated for other potential receptors that would be expected to have less frequent or intense exposure than the receptors evaluated, such as adult and senior visitors/customers. If a condition of No Significant Risk is shown to exist for the selected receptor groups, a condition of No Significant Risk will also exist for these other potential receptor groups. Exposure Point Concentration Elevated VOC levels (i.e.,above the GW-2 standards) were detected in GZ-E,B102-OW, • and B 105-OW; these wells were located to the east of the Senior Center, to the west of the Senior Center, and to the south of the Health Club, respectively. Therefore, three distinctive exposure points were identified for this risk characterization: GZ-E area, B 102-OW area,and B 105-OW area. GZ-E was located within 30 feet from the proposed Senior Center Building footprint. The temporal average concentrations based on the March and April 2006 rounds of results for GZ-E were calculated and used as the groundwater exposure point concentrations (EPCs) for the GZ-E area. B102-OW was located within the proposed Senior Center Building footprint. The maximum detected concentrations at B102-OW were used as the groundwater EPCs for the B 102-OW area. GZ-B was located approximately 40 feet to the northeast of B102-OW. Benzene was the only analyte detected in GZ-B and the detected concentration was lower than the maximum benzene concentration observed at B 102-OW. B104-OW, B105-OW, and B106-OW were located within 30 feet of the proposed Health Club Building footprint. Because the groundwater data set was limited, as a conservative step, the maximum detected concentrations among these three wells were used as the groundwater EPCs for the B 105-OW area. The indoor air EPCs were estimated using the following equation: • r High Rock Bridge Street, LLC November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 4 EPCa,,= EPCg„,x a x l/d x H x C where: EPCai, = Estimated indoor air EPC (µg/m3). Cg,,,, = The groundwater EPC(µg/L). a = An attenuation factor derived from contaminant-specific parameters (dimensionless), see Tables B-8A, B-8B, and B-8C for three exposure points (GZ-E, B102-OW, and B105-OW),respectively. d = A modification (or dilution) factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations (dimensionless). GZA used the default MassDEP values (MassDEP, 2008). H = Henry's Law Constant for the volatile constituent(dimensionless). C = Units conversion factor; 1,000 µg/m3 per 1 µg/L. The Johnson and Ettinger model was used to derive the chemical-specific soil gas to indoor air attenuation factors. The following assumptions were used in the calculation of attenuation factors for the on-site buildings: • The Senior Center Building was assumed to have an area of approximately 20,000 square feet, a perimeter of approximately 800 feet, and a ceiling height of 14 feet. These parameters were assumed based on the preliminary design of the Senior Center Building and were used to develop attenuation factors for two exposure points GZ-E and B102-OW; the Health Club Building was assumed to have an area of approximately 15,000 square feet, a perimeter of approximately 496 feet, and a ceiling height of 14 feet. These parameters were assumed based on the preliminary design of the Health Club Building and were used to develop attenuation factors for exposure point B105-OW; the depths to groundwater were assumed to be 3.8 feet, 3.0 feet, and 3.0 feet for three exposure points (GZ-E, B 102-OW, and B 105-OW), respectively. The groundwater depths at GZ-E ranged between 3.8 feet and 4.0 feet during the March and April 1996 measurements; therefore, the groundwater depth at GZ-E was conservatively assumed to be 3.8 feet. The groundwater depth measurements at B102-OW or B105-OW were not available; the groundwater depths ranged between 3.0 feet and 3.2 feet at GZ-B, which was approximately 400 feet to the northeast of B 102-OW, during the March and April 1996 measurements. The groundwater depth at B102-OW and B105-OW was conservatively assumed to be 3.0 feet. This is a conservative assumption because actual groundwater readings mostly ranged from 3 to 4 feet below the current grade; the air exchange rate in both the Senior Center Building and the Health Club Building provided by the architect is six air exchanges per hour based on the preliminary design of the buildings. • The calculation of indoor air EPCs is shown in Appendix B, Risk Assessment Tabulations. Tables B-5A, B-5B, and B-5C present three exposure points GZ-E, B102-OW, and B105-OW, respectively. The derivations of site- and chemical-specific attenuation factors are presented in Tables B-6A through B-8C. Calculated attenuation r High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 File No 04 0024926 01 Page 5 • factors for the COCs in groundwater at three exposure points were close to 1 x 10"5 for the proposed buildings. The groundwater and indoor air EPCs are presented in Table B-4. GZA notes that the guidance that is currently being drafted by MassDEP for evaluation of vapor intrusion impacts does not advocate using vapor intrusion modeling as a line of evidence for characterizing the vapor intrusion pathway in a particular building. However, it is GZA's opinion that for this Site, the Johnson and Ettinger modeling completed for this risk characterization is an important line of evidence because the buildings do not currently exist. Further, the Johnson and Ettinger modeling completed for this risk characterization represents a conservative method for evaluating possible indoor air impacts. A vapor barrier is required by the AUL to be installed for the proposed buildings. However, the mitigation of VOCs into indoor air by the vapor barrier was not incorporated into the Johnson and Ettinger model. For these reasons, it is GZA's opinion that impacts to indoor air would not be anticipated at the proposed buildings and the modeling approach represents a conservative evaluation. Exposure Assumptions The exposure assumptions for the identified receptors were intended to approximate the frequency, duration, and manner in which receptors are exposed to environmental media. • Facility workers (i.e., Senior Center and Health Club staffs) were assumed to work in the buildings and inhale the indoor air 8 hours a day and 5 days per week for 50 weeks per year (assuming 2 weeks of vacation per year). The exposure period for this receptor utilized in this analysis is 15.1 years,the longest median employer tenure (Farber, 1995). Adult users (including seniors) of the buildings are expected to have no more frequent exposure than the staffs and,therefore, were not identified as the most sensitive receptors. Child users (ages 2-18 years old) were conservatively assumed to use the buildings and inhale the indoor air 4 hours a day and 5 days per week for 50 weeks per year. The exposure period for child users utilized in this analysis is 16 years,the interval for the age group. The exposure assumptions used in this risk characterization are extremely conservative based on the programs currently run at similar facilities by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department of the City of Salem. The children's Community Services Department are mostly Parks, Recreation and p run b the Pa Y r , programs Y weekly, 1-to 2- hour programs for school-aged children. Details of the exposure assumptions and parameters are shown in Tables B-9 and B-10 for facility workers and child users,respectively. TOXICITY FACTORS Toxicity values for the evaluation of potential exposures via the identified exposure • routes were obtained from: 1) MassDEP, Office of Research and Standards (ORS) and Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater — MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets (2008); 2) United States r � High Rock Bridge Street,LLC November 30, 2009 • File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 6 Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Intcgrated Risk Information System (IRIS, 2009) (an on-line database); or 3) USEPA, Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST; USEPA, 1997b). These values are presented in Tables B-11 through B-12. The toxicity values are the same for adults and children receptors for all the COCs identified in this risk characterization but vinyl chloride. For vinyl chloride, the USEPA IRIS publishes two sets of unit risk values for evaluation of cancer effects associated with inhalation. For continuous lifetime exposure from birth, the unit risk is 8.8x10-6 per µg3/m3; while for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood, the unit risk is 4.4x10"6 per µg3/m3. As a result, the unit risk of 4.4x10"6 per µg3/m3 was used for facility workers and the unit risk of 8.8x10-6 per jig 3/m3 was used for child users in accordance with the IRIS. It should be noted that vinyl chloride was not identified as a COC for B102-OW or B105-OW exposure point. As the toxicity values are the same for adults and children and as the child users have less frequent exposure than facility workers, risks were only evaluated for facility workers for B102-OW and B105-OW exposure points. If a condition of No Significant Risk is shown to exist for facility workers at B 102-OW and B105-OW exposure points, a condition of No Significant Risk will also exist for child users at these two exposure points. • RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND CONCLUSIONS Potential exposures to indoor air impacted by vapor intrusion pathway were evaluated in this risk characterization. The risk calculation is shown in Tables B-13A through Table B-14 and the risk results are summarized in Table B-15. The non-cancer hazard indices for facility workers exposed to indoor air near GZ-E, B 102-OW, and B 105-OW are 0.5, 0.2, and 0.07, respectively; the non-cancer hazard indices do not exceed the MCP target limit of 1. The cancer risks for facility workers exposed to indoor air near GZ-E, B102-OW, and B105-OW are 1x10"5, 6x10"7, and 7x10"7, respectively; the cancer risks do not exceed the MCP risk limit of 10"5. The non-cancer hazard index for child users exposed to indoor air near GZ-E is 0.2 and do not exceed the MCP target limit of 1. The cancer risk for child users exposed to indoor air near GZ-E is 1x10"5 and do not exceed the MCP risk limit of 10"5. Based on the estimated risk results and the fact that a vapor barrier is required to be installed beneath the proposed buildings (which was not incorporated into this risk calculation), it is concluded that the COCs in site groundwater are not expected to pose significant risks to potential human receptors by entering the buildings and impacting indoor air via vapor intrusion. • High Rock Bridge Street, LLC November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 7 • LSP OPINION Based on the modified Method 3 Risk Assessment presented herein, the following LSP Opinion concerning the existing AUL is made: Permitted Activities and Uses Set Forth in the AUL Opinion. The LSP Opinion provides that a condition of No Significant Risk to health, safety, public welfare or the environment exists for any foreseeable period of time (pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000) so long as any of the following activities and uses occur on the Property: (i) Activities and uses consistent with the construction and use of commercial retail/industrial structures, providing that vapor barriers and passive sub-slab venting systems are incorporated into any building design at the Site. A building similar to the planned Community Life Center/ Senior Center, municipal and professional office space, atrium, Health Club and accessory spaces thereto evaluated as part of the risk characterization meets this requirement; (ii) Commercial retail and industrial uses of the property are permissible, provided that the soil currently located at about 2 to 5 feet below surface grade remains inaccessible. Landscaping and routine maintenance of landscaped areas within • the designated AUL area that does not cause and/or result in direct contact with, disturbance of, and/or relocation of,the soil are also permitted activities; (iii) Subsurface and/or construction activities may be conducted within the designated AUL area after preparation and implementation of a Health and Safety Plan and a Soil Management Plan. The Health and Safety Plan should consider direct contact exposures and inhalation of vapors and particulates. The Soil Management Plan should specify excavation procedures, staging areas, and off- site disposal locations; (iv) Activities and uses that are not prohibited by this Notice of AUL; and (v) Such other activities or uses, which, in the opinion of an LSP, shall present no greater risk of harm to health, safety, public welfare or the environment than the activities and uses, set forth in this Paragraph. Activities and Uses Inconsistent with the AUL Opinion. Activities and uses which are inconsistent with the objectives of this Notice of Activity and Use Limitation, and which, if implemented at the Property, may result in a significant risk of harm to health, safety, public welfare or the environment or in a substantial hazard, are as follows: (i) Activities which may cause and/or result in direct contact with, disturbance of, or • relocation of site soils are prohibited without the prior development and appropriate implementation of a Health and Safety Plan and a Soil Management Plan to prevent exposure(s)via ingestion, dermal contact, and/or inhalation; � 4 High Rock Bridge Street, LLC November 30, 2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 8 (ii) Relocation of the soil currently located at 2 to 5 fcct below surface grade within the designated AUL area to a shallower depth within the designated AUL area, unless such activity is first evaluated by an LSP who renders an Opinion which attests that a condition of No Significant Risk is maintained, consistent with the provision of the MCP; (iii) Construction of any building at the Site other than the specific structure evaluated during the risk characterization without the installation of a vapor barrier and a passive sub-slab venting system unless justifiable by an indoor air risk assessment performed by a Licensed Site Professional; Removal of, or any activities that damage and/or compromise the effectiveness of, the vapor barrier and/or passive sub-slab venting system following construction; (iv) Use of the Site as a residence or a full-time day care center or children's school where children are present for a full school day for the entire school week; and (v) Use of the Site for agricultural purposes. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project, and we would be pleased to work with you through completion of the risk characterization to site closure. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the recommendations contained in this report, or require additional information,please contact us. • Very truly yours, GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Frank S. Vetere, P.E., LSP Chunhua Liu, Sc.D., LSP Senior Project Manager Consultant/Reviewer Y Jeffre . Rowe11tP Charles A. Lindberg,LSP. Associate Principal Senior Principal FSV/CAL/JDR/CAL:kr p:\04jobs\04.0024926.01_former sylvania salem aul\aul 2009\nrvised risk assessment.doex Attachments: Figure 1 —Site Plan Appendix A—Limitations Appendix B.—Risk Characterization Tables r High Rock Bridge Street, LLC November 30,2009 File No. 04.0024926.01 Page 9 REFERENCES Farber, Henry, 1995. "Are Lifetime Jobs Disappearing? Job Duration in the United States: 1973-1993." NBER Working Paper No. 4859, Cambridge, MA. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), 2008. "Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater." OnMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), 1995. "Guidance for Disposal Site Risk Characterization in Support of Massachusetts Contingency Plan. Interim Final Policy BWSC/ORS-95-141." Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup and Office of Research and Standards. July. USEPA, 2009. "Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), " http://www.epa.goL1IRIS/, October. USEPA, 1997. "Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. July. Y • FIGURE 02002 GZA Geo2nvlronmental, Inc. PEL8 PM:23L5'ACAD\BXPLO-9-2002 ib / 0'/ 3�N p�/1 1 \ z Y� J� O A cgs s 1p F o, Of Z A / pp / M0 t g �� � CNN � �' •• �~ Q N> O a all x s 4 11++�1u, mA c�u >xN as amp z d Z� N`-' Z D`-' H�DDAA Z Z O pS NN ZN N��y C�_]y O7�D N �0z Nm Dm N( P>RA SNZmto xp 100fn )A t�lO*IV D> + ,l � m In N r vsm S( A m D , �� >z r mO nA Dy 00 �A >1'��O $ j Z A D 0 2� O� ' y m p O�ryl1Np'pppp $ N t0 Z. 2 N A O�->i RI �1Aa��1 gg �t4 •,'� m( N O�1 � Ly III 1 Co A c� ll D; 00 ; m; 2 ZD �g 9 H o> Nm Co C, mA G a � p < $ �JVIRONMENTAL SITE PLAN DES'o BY :F.S.v. �. w cRAPwe WALr�. law O P p. CNK'D BY :J.P.N. o GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER ; __._ _.....-- —-- ._... m o I APP'D BY :F.S.V. N 60 BOSTON STREET � IGZA _�+`~ SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS DRAWN BY:J.P.N. GInVITOnmental. Inc. o I o_ _....___.. ....._____ ................__ .. ._....._, SCALE :1'=BO' �ngtne��m nct Safentiatb ROAD to DATE :OCT.2009 ': (a03)623-3900 MANCHESTER.NEW MAMPSNIRE 03103 a. r • APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS • f RISK CHARACTERIZATION LIMITATIONS 1. The interpretations and conclusions presented in this report were based solely upon the services described herein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services. The work described in this report was carried out in accordance with the agreed upon Terms and Conditions. 2. GZA's risk characterization was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time. The findings of the risk characterization are dependent on numerous assumptions and uncertainties inherent in the risk assessment process. Sources of uncertainty may include the description of site conditions and the nature and extent of chemical distribution and the use of toxicity information. Consequently, the findings of the risk characterization are not an absolute characterization of actual risks, but rather serve to highlight potential sources of risk at the site. Although the range of uncertainties has not been quantified, the use of conservative assumptions and parameters throughout the assessment would be expected to err on the side of protection of human health and the environment. 3. The analysis and conclusions submitted in this report are based upon chemical data collected by GZA and other consultants during investigations of the Site. 4. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of High Rock Bridge Street, LLC, for specific application to the disposal Site identified by Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Release Tracking Number (RTN) 3-00427 and 3-16766 and located at 60 Bridge Street in Salem, Massachusetts, in accordance with generally accepted risk assessment practices. No other warranty,express or implied, is made. L:\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\Risk Assessment Report\Appendix A Risk Limits.doc 04.0024926.01 APPENDIX A GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc. Y • APPENDIX B RISK CHARACTERIZATION TABLES • TABLE B4 File No.24926.01 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 1 of Fortner OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 1 110 0120 0 9 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Results are in ppm(mgn) Company GZA GZA H&A H&A Sample ID GZ-B GZ-B GZ-E GZ-E B102-OW B102-OW Date 3128/96 4/22/96 Average 3/28/96 4122196 Average 11/4/97 Maximum Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Volatile O anic Compound 8240 8240 8260 8260 8260 VPH "I -Tdchloroethane NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 4.6 025 4.6 0.25 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 0.91 0.25 0.91 0.25 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 1,2,4-Tdrnethylbenzene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0:6 1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 Benzene 0.019 ND 0.005 0.01075 0.005 NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 0.025 0,001 0.025 0.25 Carbon Disulfide NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 2 NO a 4 NO 1.2 NO 1.2 NO 1.2 Carbon Tetrachloride NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 Chlorobenzene NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 Chloroethane NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 2 ND 0.4 NO 12 NO 1.2 NO 1.2 Chloroform NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 1.2 NO 1.2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 49 7.5 28.25 0.33 0.25 0.33 0.25 Ethylbenzene NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.25 0.006 0.001 0.006 0.25 Methyl left Butyl Ether NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 2 ND 0.4 NO 1.2 NO 0.002 NO 0.002 N-Propylbenzene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 Naphthalene NO i NO 0.2 NO 0.6 0.0024 0.001 0.0024 0.001 Naphthalene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 NO 0.005 0.0024 0.001 0.0024 0.005 p4sopropyltoluene NO 1 NO 0.2 NO 0.6 Toluene NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 1.3 0.36 0.83 NO 0.25 0.16 0.001 0.16 0.25 Trichloroethene NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 34 3.7 18.85 2 0.25 2 0.25 Vinyl Chloride NO 0.005 NO 0,005 NO 0.005 3.9 1.3 2.6 NO 0.25 ND 0.25 ylenes NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 1 ND 0.2 ND 0.6 NO 0.25 0.044 0.001 0.044 0.25 Semivolstile Oroanic CornDounds 8270 3 and 4-Methylphenol 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Benzoic add 0.011 0.005 0.011 0.005 Naphthalene NO 0.005 0.0022 0.001 0.0022 0.005 Phenol 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 Metals Arsenic NO 0.005 NO D.005 Chromium NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Nickel NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Zinc 0.033 0.02 0.033 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons NO 0.25 NO 0.25 NO 0.25 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbo s C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 2.8 0.01 2.8 0.01 C9-C12 Aliphatics Fraction 0.065 0.02 0.065 0.02 C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction NO 0.22 NO 0.22 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction NO 0.32 NO 0.32 C10-C22 Aromatics Fraction NO 1 0.2 NO 0.2 Notes: 1.Only samples collected within GW-2 area(i.e.,within 30 feet from the proposed building footprint)are included in this table. 2.Average concentrations were calculated and used to represent the conditions for wells with multiple rounds of sampling. The nondects were assumed to be half of the reporting limits for the average calculation if the anayte eras detected In at least one round of sampling. When field duplicate samples were collected,the maximum concentrations of the field duplicate pair were used to represent the well conditions for the round. L:\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Svlvania Salem AULM Evaluation 200%24926.01 data.XL&GW_Dal Qp:CL Date:I0/I2/09 • • so TABLE B-1 File No.24925.01 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of2 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 11/Moog 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Results are in ppm(mg/1) Company H&A H&A H&A H&A H&A H&A Sample ID B104-OW 8104-OW B105-OW B105-OW B106-OW B106.OW Date 11/4197 Maximum 11/4197 Maximum 11/4/97 Maximum Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Reporting Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result Limit Volatile O anic Compoand 8260 VPH 8260 VPH 8260 VPH 1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO 0.001 NO 0.001 3.5 0.001 3.5 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.0022 0.0022 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene 1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene Benzene NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND C.001 Carbon Disulfide NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 NO C.005 Carbon Tetrachloride NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 ND C.001 Chlorobenzene NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND C.001 Chloroethane NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 Chloroform ND 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 NO C.005 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND 0.001 NO C.001 Ethylbenzene NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 NO C.001 Methyl tert Butyl Ether 0.0025 0.002 0.0025 0.002 ND 0.002 NO 0.002 ND 0.002 NO 0.002 N-Propylbenzene Naphthalene ND 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 ND 0.001 NO C.001 Naphthalene ND 0.005 ND 0.001 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 ND 0.001 ND 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 p-Isopropyftoluene Toluene NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 richloroethene NO 0.001 ND 0.001 2.1 0.001 2.1 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 inyl Chloride NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 ND 0.001 NO 0.001 NO C.001 ylanes NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO 0.001 NO C.001 Sem'vola6le O anic Compounds 8270 8270 8270 3-and 4-Methylphenol NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 NO 0.005 NO C.005 Benzoic acid NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.013 0.005 0.013 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 Naphthalene NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.001 NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.001 NO C.005 Phenol NO 0.005 NO 0.005 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 Metal Arsenic 0.03 0.005 0.03 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 6.005 0.23 0.005 0.23 0.005 Chromium 0.0053 0.005 0.0053 0.005 0.0058 0.005 0.0058 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 Nickel 0.0056 0.005 0.0056 0.005 NO 0.005 ND 0.005 NO 0.005 NO 0.005 'nc 0.12 0.02 ND 0.001 0.12 0.02 0.047 0.02 0.047 0.02 0.053 0.02 0.053 0.02 Total Petroleum Hvdrocarbons Volatile Petroleum HKdrocarbons C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction NO 0.01 ND 0.01 0.58 0.01 0.58 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 C9-C12 Aliphatics Fraction ND 0.02 NO 0.02 ND 0.02 ND 0.02 NO 0.02 NO 0.02 C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction NO 0.01 ND 0.01 NO 0.01 ND 0.01 NO 0.01 NO 0.01 Extractable Petroleum H drocarbona C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction NO 0.22 ND 0.22 0.28 0.22 0.28 0.22 ND 0.22 NO 0.22 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND 0.32 ND 0.32 1.9 0.32 1.9 0.32 ND 0.32 ND 0.32 C10-C22 Aromatics Fraction NO 0.2 ND 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.2 NO 0.2 ND 0..2 Notes: 1.Only samples collected within GW-2 area(i.e.,within 30 feet from the proposed building footprint)are included in this table. 2.Average concentrations were calculated and used to represent the conditions for wells with multiple rounds of sampling. The nondects were assumed to be half of the reporting limits for the average calculation if the analyte was detected in at least one round of sampling. When field duplicate samples were collected,the maximum concentrations of the field duplicate pair were used to represent the well conditions for the round. LA00obs\04.0024926.01 roamer Sylvania Solem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 data.XLS%Gw Dat QA:CL Date:10/1209 ', TABLE B-2 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES(ppm) Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/15/2009 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Frequency Range Location of Arithmetic Contaminant of Detected Maximum Mean Detection Detected Concentration Concentration Volatile Oroanic Compound 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 / 6 ND - 4.6 B102-OW 1.4 1,1-Dichloroethane 2 / 6 ND - 0.91 B102-OW 0.20 Benzene 2 / 6 ND - 0.025 B102-OW 0.0075 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2 / 6 ND - 28.25 GZ-E 4.764 Ethylbenzene 1 / 6 ND - 0.006 B102-OW 0.0020 Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 1 / 6 ND - 0.0025 B104-OW 0.0014 Naphthalene 1 / 5 ND - 0.0024 B102-OW 0.0024 Toluene 2 / 6 ND - 0.83 GZ-E 0.17 Trichloroethene 3 / 6 ND - 18.85 GZ-E 3.8 Vinyl Chloride 1 / 6 ND - 2.6 GZ-E 0.45 Xylene(Total) 1 / 6 ND - 0.044 B102-OW 0.0096 Semivolatile Oroanic Compounds 3-and 4-Methylphenol 2 / 4 ND - 0.0056 B105-OW 0.0039 Benzoic acid 2 / 4 ND 0.013 B105-OW 0.0073 • Phenol 2 / 4 ND - 0.0056 B102-OW 0.0041 Metals Arsenic 2 / 4 ND - 0.23 B106-OW 0.066 Chromium 2 / 4 ND - 0.0058 B105-OW 0.0040 Nickel 1 / 4 ND - 0.0056 B104-OW 0.003 Zinc 4 / 4 0.033 - 0.12 B104-OW 0.063 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 2 / 4 ND - 2.8 B102-OW 0.85 C9-C12 Aliphatics Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.065 B102-OW 0.024 C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.02 B102-OW 0.0088 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.28 B105-OW 0.15 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 1.9 B105-OW 0.60 C10-C22 Aromatics Fraction 1 / 4 ND - 0.7 B105-OW 0.25 Notes: 1 Only detected analytes are listed. Laboratory reporting limits are shown in the Groundwater Analytical Results Table. 2 Samples included in these statistics are presented in the Groundwater Analytical Results Table. 3. For the purpose of calculating arithmetic mean concentrations,one-half the reporting limit was used to represent the concentrations of constituents reported as non-detects(ND). • 4. If a well was sampled more than once,the summary statistics are based on the average concentration over time at that particular well. If a field duplicate pair was collected,the summary statistics are based on the maximum concentrations detected in the pair. \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01-former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 data.XLS\gw SUM QA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-3 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/15/2009 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts CLASS ANALYTE GROUNDWATER <<<VOC>>> 1,1,1-Trichloroethane COC 1,1-Dichloroethane COC Benzene COC cis-1,2-Dichloroethene COC Ethylbenzene COC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether COC Naphthalene COC Toluene COC Trichloroethene COC Vinyl Chloride COC Xylene (Total) COC <<<SVOC>>> 4-Methylphenol COC Benzoic acid COC Phenol COC <<<TPH>>> C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction COC C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction COC • C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction COC C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction COC C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction COC <<< Inorganics>>> Arsenic COC Chromium (total) COC Nickel COC Zinc COC Notes: 1. Only analytes detected in the samples included in this risk characterization (i.e. samples listed in Table B-1)were evaluated as potential constituents of concern. 2. The C9-C12 aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction was evaluated as part of the C9-C18 aliphatic fraction because concentrations of constituents in the C9-Cl2 apliphatic range are included in the C9-Cl8 aliphatic range. 3. 3-and 4-methylphenol was evaluated as 4-methylphenol. 4. C10-C22 aromatics fraction was evaluated as C11-C22 aromatics fraction. • \\Gzanewmarketyobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_fonner Sylvania Salem AUMA Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Exp Cowds1000 Selection QA:CL Date: 10/12/09 i TABLE B-4 File No,24926.01 SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 1 011 512 00 9 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts EPC1A EPC2A EPC16 EPC213 EPC1C EPC2C Concentrations Estimated Concentrations Estimated Concentrations Estimated COC at Concentration at Concentration at Concentration GZ-E Areas in Indoor 8102-OW Area in Indoor B105-OW Area` in Indoor Air° Air" Air° (pg/L) /m' /L Im' IL 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane ND NC 4,600 3.3E+01 3500 2.6E+01 1,1-Dichloroethane ND NC 910 2.1 E+00 2.2 5.3E-03 Benzene ND NC 25 5.8E-03 ND NC cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 28,250 4.7E+01 330 5.6E-01 ND NC Ethylbenzene ND NC 6 2.0E-03 ND NC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether ND NC ND NC 2.5 6.3E-04 Naphthalene ND NC 2.4 4.4E-04 ND NC Toluene 830 2.3E-01 160 4.4E-02 ND NC Trichloroethene 18,850 7.6E+01 2,000 8.2E+00 2100 8.9E+00 Vinyl Chloride 2,600 3.0E+01 ND NC ND NC Xylene(Total) ND NC 44 1.2E-02 ND NC 4-Methylphenol ND NC 5 2.1 E-06 5.6 2.4E-06 Benzoic acid ND NC 11 1.7E-07 13 2.1 E-07 Phenol ND NC 5.6 7.8E-07 5.6 8.0E-07 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction ND NC ND NC 700 2.2E-02 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND NC ND NC 1900 NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction ND NC 2,800 1.5E+02 580 3.2E+01 C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction ND NC 20 6.6E-03 ND NC C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction ND NC 65 4.5E+00 280 2.0E+01 Arsenic ND NC ND NC 230 NC Chromium(total) ND NC ND NC 5.8 NC Nickel ND NC ND NC 5.6 NC Zinc JL ND NC 33 NC 47 NC Notes: a• The groundwater exposure point concentration for the GZ-E area is based on the arithmetic mean concentration of groundwater samples obtained from GZ-E. b• The groundwater exposure point concentration for the B102-OW area is based on the maximum detected concentration of groundwater samples obtained from B102-OW. c• The groundwater exposure point concentration for the B105-OW area is based on the maximum detected concentration of groundwater samples obtained from B104-OW,B105-OW,and B106-OW. d• The indoor air exposure point concentrations were modeled from groundwater based on a conservative vapor intrusion model presented in TABLES B-5A,B-56,AND B-5C, for GZ-E area,B102-OW area,and B105-OW area,respectively. Abbreviations: COC=constituent of concern. ND=not detected. NC=not calculated. \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Exp Con.xls\EPC CIA:CL Date:10/12/09 1 TABLE B-SA Fite No.24926.01 ESTIMATING INDOOR AIR EPCS'NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Calculated Estimated Groundwater Attenuation Dilution Henrys Law Indoor Air COC EPC1A Factorz Factor Constant 3 Concentration (NgA) (a) (d) (H) (Ng/m3) (dimensionless) EPCao- 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00E-05 1 7.0E-01 NC 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00E-05 1 2.3E-01 NC Benzene ND 1.01E-05 10 2.3E-01 NC c7is-1,2-Dichloroethene 28,250 1.00E-05 1 1.7E-01 4.7E+01 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether ND 1.01E-05 1 2.4E-02 NC Naphthalene ND 9.96E-06 1 1.8E-02 NC Toluene ' 830 1.01E-05 10 2.7E-01 2.3E-01 Trichloroethene 18,850 1.01 E-05 1 4.0E-01 7.6E+01 Vinyl Chloride 2,600 1.01 E-05 1 1.1E+00 3.0E+01 Xylene(Total) ND 1.01 E-05 10 2.7E-01 NC 4-Methylphenol ND 1.00E-05 1 4.1 E-05 NC Benzoic acid ND 9.98E-06 1 1.6E-06 NC Phenol ND 1.01E-05 1 1.4E-05 NC C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction ND 9.97E-06 10 2.9E-02 NC C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND NA 10 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction ND 1.01 E-05 10 5.3E+01 NC C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction ND 1.00E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction ND 1.00E-05 10 6.8E+01 NC Arsenic ND NA 1 NA NC Chromium(total) ND NA 1 NA NC Nickel NO NA 1 NA NC Zinc ND NA 1 NA NC 1.The following equation was used to model indoor air concentrations of volatile constituents based on concentrations detected in groundwater. EPCeir=Ca„,"(a'1/d"H`C) where: EPC& =Exposure point concentration in indoor air,in units of pg/m' Cgw=The groundwater concentrations at GZ-E. a= A calculated attentuation factor which relates the indoor air concentration to the concentration in the soil gas directly above the groundwater source.See Table B-8A. d= A modification(or dilution)factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations. Dimensionless. GZA used the default MassDEP values used in"Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater-MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets." February,2008. H= Henrys Law Constant,dimensionless form. C= Units Conversion Factor,1000 liter/m'. 2.Attenuation factors were only calculated for constituents considered to be volatile according to USEPA guidelines where the Henry's Law Constant is greater than 1 x 10s and the Molecular weight is less than 200 g/mole(USEPA,1989:RAGS Part B). 3. Constituent-specific values for Henry's Law Constant were obtained from MassDEP,Development of MCP Risk Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater,February 2008.Henrys law constants for VPH/EPH were obtained from Massachusetts DEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach,October 2002. For compounds not listed in either of the MassDEP documentations,USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(GW-ADV-Feb04.xls), February,2004 was used as a reference. Abbreviations: COC=constituent of concern;NA=Not applicable/Not Analyzed;NC=Not Calculated;ND=Not Detected. 11Gzanewmarket4obs104Jobs104.0024926.01_fonner Sylvania Salem AUL%V1 Evaluation 2009124926.01 Indoor Air(GW).xls1SUMDER_A QA: CL Date: 10/12/09 TABLE B-5B File No.24926.01 • ESTIMATING INDOOR AIR EPCS'NEAR B102-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Calculated Estimated Groundwater Attenuation Dilution Henrys Law Indoor Air COC EPC1B Factor2 Factor Constant Concentration (ligA) (a) (d) (H) (Ng/m°) (dimensionless) EPCe,, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4,600 1.02E-05 1 7.0E-01 3.3E+01 1,1-Dichloroethane 910 1.02E-05 1 2.3E-01 2.1 E+00 Benzene 25 1.02E-05 10 2.3E-01 5.8E-03 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 330 1.02E-05 1 1.7E-01 5.6E-01 Ethylbenzene 6.0 1.02E-05 10 3.2E-01 2.0E-03 Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether ND 1.02E-05 1 2.4E-02 NC Naphthalene 2.4 1.02E-05 1 1.8E-02 4.4E-04 Toluene 160 1.02E-05 10 2.7E-01 4.4E-02 Trichloroethene 2,000 1.02E-05 1 4.0E-01 8.2E+00 Vinyl Chloride ND 1.02E-05 1 1.1E+00 NC Xylene(Total) 44 1.02E-05 10 2.7E-01 1.2E-02 4-Methylphenol 5.0 1.02E-05 1 4.1 E-05 2.1 E-06 Benzoic acid 11 1.02E-05 1 1.6E-06 1.7E-07 Phenol 5.6 1.02E-05 1 1.4E-05 7.8E-07 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction ND 1.02E-05 10 2.9E-02 NC C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction ND NA 10 NA NC CS-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 2,800 1.02E-05 10 5.3E+01 1.5E+02 CO-Cl 0 Aromatic Fraction 20 1.02E-05 10 3.2E-01 6.6E-03 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 65 1.02E-05 10 6.8E+01 4.5E+00 Arsenic ND NA 1 NA NC Chromium(total) ND NA 1 NA NC . Nickel ND NA 1 NA NC Zinc 33 NA 1 NA NC 1.The following equation was used to model indoor air concentrations of volatile constituents based on concentrations detected in groundwater. EPCWr=CB,,,•(a.1/d•H'C) where: EPC& =Exposure point concentration in indoor air,in units of pg/m' Cgw=The groundwater concentrations at B102-OW. a= A calculated attentuation factor which relates the indoor air concentration to the concentration in the soil gas directly above the groundwater source.See Table B-8B. d= A modification(or dilution)factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations. Dimensionless. GZA used the default MassDEP values used in"Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater-MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets." February,2008. H= Henry's Law Constant,dimensionless form. C= Units Conversion Factor,1000 liter/m3. 2.Attenuation factors were only calculated for constituents considered to be volatile according to USEPA guidelines where the Henrys Law Constant is greater than 1 x 10 and the Molecular weight is less than 200 g/mole(USEPA,1989:RAGS Part B). 3.Constituent-spec values for Henry's Law Constant were obtained from MassDEP,Development of MCP Risk Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater,February 2008.Henry's law constants for VPH/EPH were obtained from Massachusetts DEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach,October 2002. For compounds not listed in either of the MassDEP documentations,USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(GW-ADV-Feb04.xls), February,2004 was used as a reference. Abbreviations: COC=constituent of concern;NA=Not applicable/Not Analyzed;NC=Not Calculated;NO=Not Detected. • %%Gzanewmarketyobs104Jobs104.0024926.01_fonner Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009V4926.01 Indoor Air(GW).xls\SUMDER_8 QA: CL Date: 10/12/09 TABLE B-5C File No.24926.01 • ESTIMATING INDOOR AIR EPCS'NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 1o/lanoos Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Calculated Estimated Groundwater Attenuation Dilution Henrys Law Indoor Air COC EPC1B Factor2 Factor Constant 3 Concentration (Ngn) (a) (d) (H) (Ng/m') (dimensionless) EPCau 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3,500 1.05E-05 1 7.0E-01 2.6E+01 1,1-Dichloroethane 2 1.05E-05 1 2.3E-01 5.3E-03 Benzene ND 1.05E-05 10 2.3E-01 NC cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.05E-05 1 1.7E-01 NC Ethylbenzene ND 1.05E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 2.5 1.05E-05 1 2.4E-02 6.3E-04 Naphthalene ND 1.04E-05 1 1.8E-02 NC Toluene ND 1.05E-05 10 2.7E-01 NC Trichloroethene 2,100 1.05E-05 1 4.0E-01 8.9E+00 Vinyl Chloride ND 1.05E-05 1 1.1E+00 NC Xylene(Total) ND 1.05E-05 10 2.7E-01 NC 4-Methylphenol 5.6 1.05E-05 1 4.1 E-05 2.4E-06 Benzoic acid 13 1.04E-05 1 1.6E-06 2.1 E-07 Phenol 5.6 1.05E-05 1 1.4E-05 8.0E-07 C71-C22 Aromatic Fraction 700 1.04E-05 10 2.9E-02 2.2E-02 C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction 1,900 NA 10 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 580 1.05E-05 10 5.3E+01 3.2E+01 C9-Cl0 Aromatic Fraction ND 1.05E-05 10 3.2E-01 NC C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction 280 1.05E-05 10 6.8E+01 2.0E+01 Arsenic 230 NA 1 NA NC • Chromium(total) 5.8 NA 1 NA NC Nickel 5.6 NA 1 NA NC Zinc 47 NA 1 NA NC 1.The following equation was used to model indoor air concentrations of volatile constituents based on concentrations detected in groundwater. EPC&=C9w*(a•1/d`H•C) where: EPCair = Exposure point concentration in indoor air,in units of pg/m3 C,w=The groundwater concentrations at B105-OW. the groundwater samples collected within the disposal Site boundaries. a= A calculated attentuation factor which relates the indoor air concentration to the concentration in the soil gas directly above the groundwater source.See Table B-8C. d= A modification(or dilution)factor to convert theoretical groundwater/soil gas equilibrium concentrations to realistic environmental concentrations. Dimensionless. GZA used the default MassDEP values used in"Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater-MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets." February,2008. H= Henrys Law Constant,dimensionless form. C= Units Conversion Factor,1000 liter/m3. 2.Attenuation factors were only calculated for constituents considered to be volatile according to USEPA guidelines where the Henry's Law Constant is greater than 1 x 10-5 and the Molecular weight is less than 200 g/mole(USEPA,1989:RAGS Part B). 3.Constituent-specific values for Henrys Law Constant were obtained from MassDEP,Development of MCP Risk Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater,February 2008.Henrys law constants for VPH/EPH were obtained from Massachusetts DEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach,October 2002. For compounds not listed in either of the MassDEP documentations,USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(GW-ADV-Feb04.xls), February,2004 was used as a reference. • Abbreviations: CDC=constituent of concern;NA=Not applicable/Not Analyzed;NC=Not Calculated;ND=Not Detected. 11Gzanewmarketyobs104Jobs104.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009124926.01 Indoor Air(GW).xls\SUMDEFt C QA: CL Date: 10/12/09 • • TABLE B-6A File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF"OVERALL"EFFECTIVE POROUS MEDIA DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts "Overall" Molecular Vapor Molecular Water Effective Constituent Dry Soil Total Moisture Vapor Diffusivity Porous Media Diffusivity Porous Media Porous Media Bulk Density' Porosity' Filled Filled in Air 2 Diffusion Coeff. in Water Diffusion Coeff. Diffusion Coeff. (g/cm3) Porosity' Porosity' (cm'/s) (cm2/s) (cm2/s) (cm'/s) (cmz/s) gd n, n, n Dair Dv Dwater Dm Dt cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.074 1.19E-02 1.1E-05 4.83E-09 1.19E-02 Toluene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.087 1.41E-02 8.6E-06 3.68E-09 1.41E-02 Trichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 9.1 E-06 3.89E-09 1.28E-02 inyl Chloride 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.106 1.71 E-02 1.2E-05 5.26E-09 1.71 E-02 Notes: 1.The value for sand was adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. 2.Contaminant-specific values were adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\jobsk04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor A.XLS\DIFFUS TABLE 136-13 File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF"OVERALL"EFFECTIVE POROUS MEDIA DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT NEAR B102-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts "Overall" Molecular Vapor Molecular Water Effective Constituent Dry Soil Total Moisture Vapor Diffusivity Porous Media Diffusivity Porous Media Porous Media Bulk Density' Porosity' Filled Filled in Air 2 Diffusion Coeff. in Water Diffusion Coeff. Diffusion Coeff. (g/cm') Porosity' Porosity' (Cm2/s) (CM2/s) (cmz/s) (cm2/s) (CM2/s) 9a nt nm nv Dair Dv Dwater Dm Dt 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.078 1.26E-02 8.8E-06 3.76E-09 1.26E-02 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.074 1.20E-02 1.1E-05 4.49E-09 1.20E-02 Benzene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.088 1.42E-02 9.8E-06 4.19E-09 1.42E-02 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.074 1.19E-02 1.1E-05 4.83E-09 1.19E-02 Ethylbenzene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.075 1.21E-02 7.8E-06 3.33E-09 1.21E-02 Naphthalene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.059 9.54E-03 7.5E-06 3.21 E-09 9.54E-03 Toluene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.087 1.41 E-02 8.6E-06 3.68E-09 1.41 E-02 Trichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 9.1 E-06 3.89E-09 1.28E-02 ylene(Total) 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 8.9E-06 3.80E-09 1.28E-02 4-Methylphenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.072 1.17E-02 9.2E-06 3.95E-09 1.17E-02 Benzoic acid 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.061 9.85E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.85E-03 Phenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.083 1.35E-02 1.0E-05 4.40E-09 1.35E-02 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.060 9.70E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.70E-03 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.080 1.29E-02 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 1.29E-02 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.070 1.13E-02 5.0E-06 2.14E-09 1.13E-02 EZinc 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 NA NA NA NA NA Notes: 1.The value for sand was adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. 2.Contaminant-specific values were adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor B.XLS\DIFFUS TABLE B-6C File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF"OVERALL"EFFECTIVE POROUS MEDIA DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts "Overall" Molecular Vapor Molecular Water Effective Constituent Dry Soil Total Moisture Vapor Diffusivity Porous Media Diffusivity Porous Media Porous Media Bulk Density' Porosity' Filled Filled in Air 2 Diffusion Coeff. in Water Diffusion Coeff. Diffusion Coeff. (g/cm') Porosity' Porosity' (cmZ/s) (cm2/s) (cmz/s) (cm'/s) (cmz/s) 9d nt nm nv Dair Dv Dwater Dm Dt 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.078 1.26E-02 8.8E-06 3.76E-09 1.26E-02 Trichloroethene 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.079 1.28E-02 9.1 E-06 3.89E-09 1.28E-02 4-Methylphenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.072 1.17E-02 9.2E-06 3.95E-09 1.17E-02 Benzoic acid 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.061 9.85E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.85E-03 Phenol 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.083 1.35E-02 1.0E-05 4.40E-09 1.35E-02 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.060 9.70E-03 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 9.70E-03 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.080 1.29E-02 1.0E-05 4.27E-09 1.29E-02 C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.66 0.375 0.054 0.321 0.070 1.13E-02 5.0E-06 2.14E-09 1.13E-02 Notes: 1.The value for sand was adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. 2.Contaminant-specific values were adopted from USEPA's Johnson and Ettinger(1991)Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings(SL-ADV-Feb04.xls),February,2004. QA:CL Date:10/12109 1\Gzanewmarketljobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor C.XLS\DIFFUS TABLE B-7A File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF SOIL GAS INTO THE BUILDING NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Length of Foundation Basement Total Radius of Air Pathway from Pressure Difference Vapor. Volumetric Flow Soil Contact Crack Basement Basement Slab Bottom to Source to Indoor Airs Soil Intrinsic Dynamic Rate of Soil Gas Area' Acr/Ab2 Area Crack Length Crack Ground Surface° 1 Pa=10 g/cm-s2 Perhieabilitye Viscosity' into Building (mz) (m2) (m) (cm) (m) (Pa) (cmZ) (g/cm-s) (cm3/s) Ab n Acrack Xcrack r cr Zcrack A v u Osoil 2,324 0.001 2.32 244 0.5 0.70 1 1.0E-07 1.8E-04 171 Notes: 1. Foundation Soil Contact Area(Ab)is based on approximate area exposed to soil,i.e.,the footprint of the proposed building(Senior Center). 2. n=Acrack/Ab,where Acrack=crack area(assumed to be 0.001). 3.Total Basement Crack Length(Xcrack)is based on the approximate total floortwall seam perimeter distance of the proposed building(Senior Center). 4. Length of Air Pathway from Slab Bottom to Ground Surface (Zcrack)is approximately 0.7 meters based on the assumption that the slab would be constructed 0.5 below the grade and the thickness of the slab is 20 cm. 5. Pressure Difference(Source to Indoor Air)is assumed to be 1 Pa= 1 E-05 atm(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). 6.Soil Intrinsic Permeability for this site with fine to coarse sand and some fine to medium gravel is assumed to be 1.0E-07 cm2. from Johnson&Ettinger, 1991 table for fine to medium sand. 7.Vapor Dynamic Viscosity was assumed to be 1.8E-04 g/cm-s(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor A.XLS\QSOIL • i i TABLE 137-13 File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF SOIL GAS INTO THE BUILDING NEAR B102-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Length of Foundation Basement Total Radius of Air Pathway from Pressure Difference Vapor Volumetric Flow Soil Contact Crack Basement Basement Slab Bottom to Source to Indoor Airs Soil Intrinsic Dynamic Rate of Soil Gas Area' Acr/Ab2 Area Crack Length3 Crack Ground Surface4 1 Pa= 10 g/cm-s2 Permeabilitye Viscosity into Building (m2) (M2) (m) (cm) (m) (Pa) (cm2) (g/cm-s) (cm'/s) Ab n Acrack Xcrack r cr Zcrack dP k v u Qsoil 2,324 0.001 2.32 244 0.5 0.70 1 1.0E-07 1.8E-04 171 Notes: 1. Foundation Soil Contact Area(Ab)is based on approximate area exposed to soil, i.e.,the footprint of the proposed building(Senior Center). 2. n=Acrack/Ab,where Acrack=crack area(assumed to be 0.001). 3.Total Basement Crack Length(Xcrack)is based on the approximate total floortwall seam perimeter distance of the proposed building(Senior Center). 4. Length of Air Pathway from Slab Bottom to Ground Surface (Zcrack)is approximately 0.7 meters based on the assumption that the slab would be constructed 0.5 below the grade and the thickness of the slab is 20 cm. 5. Pressure Difference(Source to Indoor Air)is assumed to be 1 Pa= 1 E-05 atm(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). 6. Soil Intrinsic Permeability for this site with fine to coarse sand and some fine to medium gravel is assumed to be 1.0E-07 CM2. from Johnson&Ettinger, 1991 table for fine to medium sand. 7.Vapor Dynamic Viscosity was assumed to be 1.8E-04 g/cm-s(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor B.XLS\QSOIL i TABLE B-7C File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OF SOIL GAS INTO THE BUILDING NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Length of Foundation Basement Total Radius of Air Pathway from Pressure Difference Vapor Volumetric Flow Soil Contact Crack Basement Basement Slab Bottom to Source to Indoor Airs Soil Intrinsic Dynamic Rate of Soil Gas Area' Acr/Ab2 Area Crack Length Crack Ground Surface° 1 Pa= 10 g/cm-s' Permeabilitys Viscosity into Building (mz) (mZ) (m) (cm) (m) (Pa) (cmz) (g/cm-s) (cm'/s) Ab n Acrack Xcrack r cr Zcrack dP k v u Qsoll 1,394 0.001 1.39 151 0.5 0.70 1 1.0E-07 1.8E-04 105 Notes: 1. Foundation Soil Contact Area(Ab)is based on approximate area exposed to soil, i.e.,the footprint of the proposed building(Health Club). 2. n=Acrack/Ab,where Acrack=crack area(assumed to be 0.001). 3.Total Crack Length(Xcrack)is based on the approximate total floor/wall seam perimeter distance of the proposed building(Health Club). 4. Length of Air Pathway from Slab Bottom to Ground Surface (Zcrack)is approximately 0.7 meters based on the assumption that the slab would be constructed 0.5 below the grade and the thickness of the slab is 20 cm. 5. Pressure Difference(Source to Indoor Air)is assumed to be 1 Pa= 1 E-05 atm(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). 6. Soil Intrinsic Permeability for this site with fine to coarse sand and some fine to medium gravel is assumed to be 1.0E-07 cm2. from Johnson&Ettinger, 1991 table for fine to medium sand. 7.Vapor Dynamic Viscosity was assumed to be 1.8E-04 g/cm-s(Johnson&Ettinger, 1991). QA:CL Date:10/12/09 \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor C.XLS\QSOIL i • • • TABLE B-8A Re No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF CONTAMINANT-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS NEAR GZ-E Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc, 10114/2009 4 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Basement Distance from Effective Vapor- Attenuation "Overalr Effective Foundation or Building Contaminant Volumetric Flow Pressure Diffusion Basement Advective Diffusion factor= Porous Media Soil Contact Ventilation Source to Rate of Soil Gas Foundation Coefficient Through Crack Dominated Constant Dominated Qsoil/Qbuilding Cbuidling/ Diffusion Coeff. Area Rate' Foundation" into Building Thicknessa the Crack Acr/Ab Area =Effective Pedet Constant Csource (ame/s) (ml) (cm'/s) (cm) (kart'/s) (cm) (cl"$) (0) Number Dt Ab Qbulldln Lt Qsoil Lerack Deraek n Acrack A B C alpha ds-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.19E.02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.19E-02 0.001 2.324 12.34 3.60E-04 1.03E-05 1.00E-05 oluene 1.41E-02 2324 1.7E+07 48 1.7E+02 20 1.41E-02 0.001 2.324 10.44 4.26E-04 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 Tdchloroethene 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.28E-02 0.001 2.324 11.50 3.87E-04 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 mylChloride 1.71E-02 2324 1.7E+07 46 1.7E+02 20 1.71E-02 0.001 2.324 8.57 5.19E-04 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 Notes: 1.Building ventilation rate(Qbuilding)is based on the approximate volume of one floor of the proposed building(Senior Center)assuming a 14 foot ceiling and six air change per hour. 2.Distance from Contaminant Source to Foundation(Lt)is based on the groundwater depth and the slab characteristics(i.e.,50 cm below grade and 20 cm thick). 3.Foundation Thickness(Lcrack)is thickness of slab which is assumed to be 8 inches or 20 cm. OA CL bate:1011ZW UGzane wkeNobs104Jobs104.0024M.01 former Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluallon 2009124928.01 Attenuation Factor.A XLSWAIN i TABLE B-8B File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF CONTAMINANT-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS NEAR 8102-OW Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/1412009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Basement Distance from Effective Vapor- Attenuation "Overair Effective Foundation or Building Contaminant Volumetric Flow Pressure Diffusion Basement Advective Diffusion factor= Porous Media Soil Contact Ventilation Source to Rate of Soil Gas Foundation Coefficient Through Crack Dominated Constant Dominated QsoiVObuilding Cbuidling/ Diffusion Coeff. Area Rate/ Foundation' into Building Thickness' the Crack Acx/Ab Area =Effective Pedet Constant Csource (CM2/3) (m') (an'/s) (cm) (cm'/s) (cm) (cm'/s) W) Number Dt Ab Qbulldlng Lt Qsoll Lcrack Dcrack n Acrack A B C alpha 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.26E-02 0.001 2.324 8.73 8.51E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.20E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.20E-02 0.001 2.324 9.18 8.09E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Benzene 1.42E.02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.42E-02 0.001 2.324 7.74 9.60E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E.05 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.19E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.19E-02 0.001 2.324 9.26 8.03E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Ethylbenzene 1.21E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.21E-02 0.001 2.324 9.08 8.18E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Naphthalene 9.54E-03 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 9.54E-03 0.001 2.324 11.55 6.44E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 oluene 1.41E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.41E-02 0.001 2.324 7.83 9.49E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 richloroethene 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 2.324 8.62 8.82E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 ylene(Total) 1.28E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 2.324 8.62 8.62E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Methyiphenol 1.17E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.17E-02 0.001 2.324 9.41 7.90E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Benzoic add 9.85E-03 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 9.85E-03 0.001 2.324 11.19 6.64E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Phenol 1.35E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.35E-02 0.001 2.324 8.17 9.10E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 9.70E-03 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 9.70E-03 0.001 2.324 11.35 6.55E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 CS C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.29E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.29E-02 0.001 2.324 8.52 8.73E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 C9-Cl8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.13E-02 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 1.13E-02 0.001 2.324 9.73 7.64E-04 1.03E-05 1.02E-05 Zinc NA 2324 1.7E+07 21 1.7E+02 15 NA 0.001 2.324 NA NA NA NA Notes: 1.Building ventilation rate(Obuiiding)is based on the approximate volume of one floor of the proposed building(Senior Center)assuming a 14 foot ceiling and sbk air change per hour. 2.Distance from Contaminant Source to Foundation(Lt)is based on the groundwater depth and the slab characteristics(i.e.,50 cm below grade and 20 cm thick). 3.Foundation Thickness(Lcrack)is thickness of slab which is assumed to be 6 inches or 15 cm. CIA:CL Cate:10/12/09 \%Gzane arketyobs104Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUUVI Evaluation 2009124926.01 Attenuation Factor B.XLSWAIN TABLE B-8C Fie No.24926.01 _ CALCULATION OF CONTAMINANT-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS NEAR B105-OW Page 1 of 1 Fortner OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 1011412009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Basement Distance from Effective Vapor- Attenuation "Overall"Effective Foundation or Building Contaminant Volumetric,Flow Pressure Diffusion Basement Advective Diffusion factor= Porous Media Soil Contact Ventilation Source to Rate of Soil Gas Foundation Coefficient Through Crack Dominated Constant Dominated Qsoil/Qbuilding Cbuidling/ Diffusion Coeff. Area Rate' Foundation into Building Thidknessa the Crack Acr/Ab Area =Effective Pedet Constant Csource (cm'/s) W) (an'/s) (cm) (an'/a) (cm) (cm=/s) (m') Number Dt Ab Cibuilding Lt Qsoil Lcrack Dcrack n Acrack. A B C al ha 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.26E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.26E-02 0.001 1.394 8.97 8.51E-04 1.06E-05 1.05E-05 richloroethene 1.28E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.28E-02 0.001 1.394 8.85 8.62E-04 1.08E-05 1.05E-05 4-Methylphenol 1.17E-02 1394 9.9E+08 21 1.1E+02 15 1.17E-02 0.001 1.394 9.66 7.90E-04 1.06E-05 1.05E-05 Benzoic add 9.85E-03 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 9.85E-03 0.001 1.394 11.48 6.64E-04 1.06E-05 1.04E-05 Phenol 1.35E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.35E-02 0.001 1.394 8.39 9.10E-04 1.06E-05 1.05E-05 C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 9.70E-03 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 9.70E-03 0.001 1.394 11.66 6.55E-04 1.06E-05 1.04E-05 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.29E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.29E-02 0.001 1.394 8.74 8.73E-04 1.06E-05 1.05E-05 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 1.13E-02 1394 9.9E+06 21 1.1E+02 15 1.13E-02 0.001 1.394 9.99 7.64E-04 1.06E-05 1.05E-05 Notes: 1.Building ventilation rate(Qbuiiding)is based on the approximate volume of one floor of the proposed building(Health Club)assuming a 14 foot ceiling and six air change per hour. 2.Distance from Contaminant Source to Foundation(Lt)is based on the groundwater depth and the slab characteristics(i.e.,50 cm below grade and 20 cm thick). 3.Foundation Thickness(Lcrack)is thickness of slab which is assumed to be 6 inches or 15 an. QA:CL Date:10112M9 MGxane arketyobs104Jobe\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Attenuation Factor c.XLS\MAIN TABLE B-9 File No.24926.01 FACILITY WORKER EXPOSURE PROFILE Page ofI 10/1409 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Equations Used to Calculate Average Daily Exposure(ADE)and Lifetime Average Daily Exposure(LADE) EXPOSURE PATHWAY:Inhalation of Vapors in Indoor Air ADE• — EPCair*EF*ED*EP*C2*C5 md-air— Equation 7 APnc LADE — EPCair"EF*ED*EP*C2 mdair— AP Equation 8 c Receptor-Specific Values Parameter Definition Units (ages>18 years) Rationale/Reference ADEindair Average Daily Exposure mg/m3 Calculated Equation 7 LADEind.ir Lifetime Average Daily Exposure pg/m3 Calculated Equation 8 EPCak Exposure Point Concentration in Air pg/m3 TABLE B-4 • modeled from groundwater concentrations EF Exposure Frequency events/year 250 Five days per week for 50 weeks(assuming 2 weeks vacation) ED Exposure Duration hours/event 8 MADEP, 1992;Table 8-26 EP Exposure Period years 15.1 Longest median employer tenure, Farber 1995. C2 conversion factor for units days/hr 0.0417 Constant C5 conversion factor for units mg/Ng 0.001 Constant APnc Averaging Period, non-cancer days 5,512 equals EP*365 days/year APc Averaging Period,cancer days 27,375 equals average lifetime,75 years*365 days/year Abbreviations: MADEP=Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection; NA=Not Applicable. NGzanewmarkeNobs%Wobs104.0024M.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL%VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).rdslParameters QA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-10 File No.24926.01 CHILD USER EXPOSURE PROFILE Page t of 1 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Equations Used to Calculate Average Daily Exposure(ADE)and Lifetime Average Daily Exposure(LADE) EXPOSURE PATHWAY:Inhalation of Vapors In Indoor Air ADEimd-air— EPCair"EF"ED"EP"C2"C5 — Equation 1 APnr LADE — EPCair"EF"ED"EP"C2 Ana-air— Equation 2 APo Receptor-Specific Values Parameter Definition Units (ages 2-18 yrs) Rationale/Reference ADEind-air Average Daily Exposure Mg/m3 Calculated Equation 1 LADEind-air Lifetime Average Daily Exposure pg/m3 Calculated Equation 2 EPCair Exposure Point Concentration in Air pg/m3 TABLE B-4 modeled from groundwater concentrations EF Exposure Frequency events/year 250 Five days per week for 50 weeks ED Exposure Duration hours/event 4 MADEP, 1992;Table 8-26 EP Exposure Period years 16 Interval for age group C2 conversion factor for units days/hr 0.0417 Constant C5 conversion factor for units mg/pg 0.001 Constant APnc Averaging Period, non-cancer days 5,840 equals EP"365 days/year APe Averaging Period,cancer days 27,375 equals average lifetime,75 years"365 days/year Abbreviations: MADEP=Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection; NA=Not Applicable. %%GzanewmarketVobs104Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL%VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(Child Users)AMParameters QA:CL Date:10/12/09 I TABLE B41 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF DOSE-RESPONSE INFORMATION-NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS-INHALATION Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Inhalation Inhalation Subchronic Chronic Chronic Target Critical Study Study COC Reference Reference Inhalation Organ/System Effect Animal Method Concentration Concentration RfC m /m' m /m' OF x MF 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane 5.2 d 5.2 t 1,1-Dichloroethane 5 b 0.5 b 100;1000 kidney toxicity cat inhalation EBenzene 0.09 i 0.03 a 300 x 1 blood decreased lymphocyte count human inhalaticn s-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.035 d 0.035 x thylbenzene 1 d 1 a 300 x 1 fetus developmental toxicity rat/rabbit inhalation Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 3 d 3 a 100 x 1 liver,kidney renal lesions increased organ weight rat inhalation Naphthalene 0.003 d 0.003 a 3000 x 1 respiratory system hyperplasia and metaplasia in epithelium mouse inhalation Toluene 5 d 5 a CNS neurological effects humans Inhalation-occupat. Trichloroethene 0.18 d 0.18 a CNS,liver,endocrine systems critical effects inyl Chloride 0.1 d 0.1 a 30 x 1 liver liver cell polymorphism rat feeding study ylene(Total) 0.3 i 0.1 a 300 x 1 CNS impaired motor coordination rat inhalation 4-Methylphenol 0.12 d 0.12 e Benzoic acid Phenol 0.26 d 0.26 e C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 0.5 c 0.05 g C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 0.2 d 0.2 g C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 0.5 c 0.05 g C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 0.6 c 0.2 g rsenic - 0.0000025 d 0.0000025 e Chromium(total) 0.0003 i 0.0001 i Nickel - 0.001 d 0.001 e inc 0.0014 d 0.0014 i Hierarchy of Sources: a. US EPA Integrated Risk Information System(IRIS),hftpl/www.epa.gov/IRIS,October,2009. b. US EPA,Health Effects Summary Tables(HEAST),Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response/Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Annual FY 1997. c. MassDEP 2008.(MCP Toxicity.xls).Value withdrawn from HEAST was used based on value listed in MassDEP Toxicity.)ds. d. Chronic RfC has been used here as subchronic RfC as a conservative step. e. Allowable Threshold Concentration(ATC)calculated following Chemical Health Effects Assessment Methodology and the Method to Derive Allowable Ambient Limits(CHEWAAL).ORS Report 90-1.ATC=5 x TEL. TELs listed in MassDEP,December 1995. g. M.ssDEP,Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites:Implementation of the MassDEP VPH/EPH Approach,Final Policy(NWSC-02-411).Table 4-13.October 2002. i. MassDEP 2008.Development of MCP Risk-Based Levels for Soil and Groundwater.(MCP Toxicity.)ls) t. MassDEP 2008.(MCP Toxicity.)ls).Value consistent with approach presented in"Updated Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction Toxicity Values for the VPH/EPH/APH Methodology'MassDEP 2003 and"Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites"MassDE x. MassDEP 2008.(MCP Toxicity.)ls).MassDEP approach to convert oral RID to RIC using RIC(mg/m3)_(RID(mg/kg-day)*Body Weight(70 kg)]/Ventilation Rate(20 m3/day) Notes: 1. A blank space indicates no data found. Abbreviations: CNS=Central nervous system;COC=Constituent of Concern;MF=Modifying Factor,RIC=Reference Concentration;OF=Uncertainty Factor. \1Gzanewmarkergobe\04Joba104.0024M.01 fomnrr Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 20=2492e.o1 Chem Info.xls%DRNCI QA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-12 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF DOSE-RESPONSE INFORMATION-CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS Page 1 of 1 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 10/14/2009 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts Oral Weight Cancer Target Study Study Inhalation Target Study Study COC of Slope Organ/System Animal Method Unit Organ/System Animal Method Evidence Factor (oral) Risk (Inhalation) Class (mg/kg/day)" 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane D a 1,1-Dichloroethane C a Benzene A a 5.5E-02 a blood human inhalation 7.8E-6 a blood human inhalation ds-1,2-Dichloroethene D a Ethylbenzene D a Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether Naphthalene C a Toluene D a richloroethene C-82 a 1.1E-02 c 1.7E-6 C 8.8E-8(lifetime exposure from birth) 1.4(lifetime exposure from birth) 4.4E-6(lifetime exposure through Vinyl Chloride A a 0.72(lifetime exposure through adulthood) a liver rat oral-diet adulthood) a liver rat inhalation ylene(Total) D a Methylphenol C a Benzoic acid D a Phenol D a C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction C19-C36 Aliphatic Fraction C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction Arsenic A a 1.5E+00 a skin human oral water 4.3E-3 a lung human Inhalation-occupat. Chromium(total) D a 1.2E-2 a lung human occupational exposure(inhalation) Nickel 4.8E-4 a Zinc D a Hierarchy of Sources: a. US EPA Integrated Risk Information System(IRIS),httpJAvww.epa.gov/IRIS,October,2009. c. MassDEP 2008(MCP Toxicity.xls).This value has been withdrawn from HEAST,although many consultants may continue to use it,lacking any new information. Consult HEAST for any additional information. e.MassDEP 2008(MCP Toxicity.xls).This Cancer Slope Factor or Unit Risk was taken from a fact sheet distributed by the U.S.EPA Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center at ECAO-Cindnnati,current as of September 2',1992. Notes: 1. Weight of evidence dassifiaA: Human carcinogen C: Possible human carcinogen B: Probable human carcinogen D: Not classified B1: Limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans from epidemiological studies E: No evidence of carcinogenicity u: Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals,inadequate evidence in humans 2. Inhalation unit risk is defined as the risk per concentration unit in air,e.g.risk per pg/ma. 3. Blank space indicates no data available. Abbreviations: COC=constituent of concern. NGzanevmrarkefliobs1Mobs104.0024926.01 former SyNanla Salem AVLwI Evaluation 20091249M.01 Chem Inro.xla\DRC CA:CL Date:10/12/09 TABLE B-13A File No.24926.01 • CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E 10n4/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of In oor Air See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and ADEina air= EPCi„d-air*EF*ED*EP*C2*C5 Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APnc Descriptions HQind-air= ADEin"ir HQ RfC Hlir�d av 'nd air COC EPCind-air ADEicd-.ir RfC HQir�-ir EPC2A Chronic (Ng/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 1.1 E-02 3.5E-02 3.1 E-01 Toluene 2.3E-01 5.2E-05 5.0E+00 1.0E-05 Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 1.7E-02 1.8E-01 9.7E-02 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 6.8E-03 1.0E-01 6.8E-02 Hlind-air 5E-01 • Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUUVI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).x1s\Indoor QAN5b43ataodqLVJ09 TABLE B-13A(Continued) File No.24926.01 • CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CANCER EFFECTS n a atlon of Indoor Air LADE;,dv= EPCindair"EF*ED-EP"C2 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APB Descriptions ELCRir,d..ir= LADEir,"ir"UR Total ELCR — mdair ELCRind-eir COC EPCind-air LADEin"ir UR ELCRin"ir EPC2A (Ng/m) (Ng/m3) (Ng/m3)'' unitless cis-1;2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 2.2E+00 NA NC Toluene 2.3E-01 1.0E-02 NA NC Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 3.5E+00 1.7E-06 6.0E-06 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 1.4E+00 4.4E-06 6.1E-06 Total ELCRi„d�v: 1 E- • Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA= Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\Indoor fflAMbd&qZeA10/12/09 TABLE B-13B File No.24926.01 • CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B102-OW 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of Indoor Air ADEineair= EPCindair*EF*ED*EP*C2*C5 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APnc Descriptions HQindair= ADEindair Hl -indair- HQ mdair RfC COC EPCindair ADEindair RfC HQindair EPC213 Chronic (Ng/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m) unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.3E+01 7.5E-03 5.2E+00 1.4E-03 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.1E+00 4.9E-04 5.0E-01 9.7E-04 Benzene 5.8E-03 1.3E-06 3.0E-02 4.4E-05 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.6E-01 1.3E-04 3.5E-02 3.7E-03 Ethylbenzene 2.0E-03 4.5E-07 1.0E+00 4.5E-07 Naphthalene 4.4E-04 1.0E-07 3.0E-03 3.3E-05 Toluene 4.4E-02 1.0E-05 5.0E+00 2.0E-06 Trichloroethene 8.2E+00 1.9E-03 1.8E-01. 1.0E-02 Xylene(Total) 1.2E-02 2.8E-06 1.0E-01 2.8E-05 • 4-Methylphenol 2.1E-06 4.8E-10 1.2E-01 4.0E-09 Benzoic acid 1.7E-07 4.0E-11 NA NC Phenol 7.8E-07 1.8E-10 2.6E-01 6.8E-10 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.5E+02 3.5E-02 2.0E-01 1.7E-01 C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 6.6E-03 1.5E-06 5.0E-02 3.0E-05 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 4.5E+00 1.0E-03 2.0E-01 5.1 E-03 Hlindair 2E-01 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarketyobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_forrner Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\lndoor Air(Non-Ca&iQlIDate:10/12/09 TABLE B-13B(Continued) File No.24926.01 • CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B102-OW 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of Indoor Air LADEind-air= EPCind-air'EF•ED*EP*C2 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APB Descriptions ELCRindair= LADEind-air"UR Total ELCR mdair- F. ELCRindair COC EPCind-air LADEind-air UR ELCRind-air EPC2B (Ng/m3) (Ng/m3) (Ng/rn)-' unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.3E+01 1.5E+00 NA NC 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.1E+00 9.8E-02 NA NC Benzene 5.8E-03 2.7E-04 7.8E-06 2.1 E-09 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.6E-01 2.6E-02 NA NC Ethylbenzene 2.0E-03 9.1 E-05 NA NC Naphthalene 4.4E-04 2.0E-05 NA NC Toluene 4.4E-02 2.0E-03 NA NC Trichloroethene 8.2E+00 3.8E-01 1.7E-06 6.4E-07 Xylene(Total) 1.2E-02 5.6E-04 NA NC • 4-Methylphenol 2.1 E-06 9.6E-08 NA NC Benzoic acid 1.7E-07 8.0E-09 NA NC Phenol 7.8E-07 3.6E-08 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 1.5E+02 7.0E+00 NA NC C9-C10 Aromatic Fraction 6.6E-03 3.0E-04 NA NC C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 4.5E+00 2.1 E-01 NA NC Total ELCRind-air 6E-07 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA= Not Applicable/Not Available; NC= Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\Indoor Air(CancerpA CL Date:10/12/09 i F TABLE B-13C File No.24926.01 • CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B105-OW 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air ADEind-air= EPCind-air*EF*ED*EP*C2*C5 See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC AP„r Descriptions I IQind-air= ADEind-arc - F Hlind arc- HQ mdair RfC COC EPCi„d_.rc ADEi„d_.rc RfC HQ„,d-air EPC2C Chronic (Ng/m) (mg/m) (mg/m3) unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.6E+01 5.9E-03 5.2E+00 1.1E-03 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.3E-03 1.2E-06 5.0E-01 2.4E-06 Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 6.3E-04 1.4E-07 3.0E+00 4.8E-08 Trichloroethene 8.9E+00 2.0E-03 1.8E-01 1.1 E-02 4-Methylphenol 2.4E-06 5.5E-10 1.2E-01 4.6E-09 Benzoic acid 2.1 E-07 4.8E-11 NA NC Phenol 8.0E-07 1.8E-10 2.6E-01 7.0E-10 • C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 2.2E-02 4.9E-06 5.0E-02 9.8E-05 C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 3.2E+01 7.4E-03 2.0E-01 3.7E-02 C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 2.0E+01 4.5E-03 2.0E-01 2.3E-02 Hlind-air: 7E-02 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01-former Sylvania Salem AULM Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\Indoor!QANbb43a"L 2/09 r TABLE B-13C(Continued) File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR B105-OW 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts RECEPTOR: Facility Workers CANCER EFFECTS Inhalation of Indoor Air See TABLE B-9 for Exposure Variables and LADE",d-air= EPCind-air°EF*ED*EP-C2 Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APr Descriptions ELCRind it= LADEi„d_r*UR Total ELCR - md-air- �. ELCRind-air COC EPCind-air LADEir"ir UR ELCRi,,"ir EPC2C (Ng/m) (Ng/m) (Ng/mY unitless 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.6E+01 1.2E+00 NA NC 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.3E-03 2.4E-04 NA NC Methyl-Tert-Butyl-Ether 6.3E-04 2.9E-05 NA NC Trichloroethene 8.9E+00 4.1E-01 1.7E-06 6.9E-07 4-Methylphenol 2.4E-06 1.1 E-07 NA NC Benzoic acid 2.1 E-07 9.7E-09 NA NC Phenol 8.0E-07 3.7E-08 NA NC C11-C22 Aromatic Fraction 2.2E-02 9.9E-04 NA NC C5-C8 Aliphatic Fraction 3.2E+01 1.5E+00 NA NC C9-C18 Aliphatic Fraction 2.0E+01 9.1 E-01 NA NC Total ELCRind-air 7E-07 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC= Not Calculated. \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01—former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(FW).xls\Indoor MAMbdWeC10/12/09 tt ~ TABLE B-14 File No.24926.01 • CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 2 FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem,Massachusetts CHILD USERS CHRONIC NON-CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of indoor Air See TABLE B-10 for Exposure Variables ADEind-eir= EPCjnd.a;r"EF* ED*EP"C2"C5 and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC AP„c Descriptions HQind-air- ADEird-air - F�Hlindair- HQ and air RfC COC EPCind-a;r ADEin"v RfC HQind-air EPC2A Chronic (Ng/m3) (mg/m) (mg/m) unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 5.4E-03 3.5E-02 1.5E-01 Toluene 2.3E-01 2.6E-05 5.0E+00 5.2E-06 Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 8.7E-03 1.8E-01 4.8E-02 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 3.4E-03 1.0E-01 3.4E-02 HljrKj_8jr:11 2E-01 • Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA=Not Applicable/Not Available; NC=Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarketyobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01—former Sylvania Salem AULNI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(Child Users).xls\Indoor Air(Non- Canoer) A QA:CL Date: 10/12/09 I - TABLE B-14(Continued) File No.24926.01 CALCULATION OF LIFETIME AVERAGE DAILY EXPOSURES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 2 of 2 • FOR INHALATION OF INDOOR AIR NEAR GZ-E 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts CHILD USERS CANCER EFFECTS inhalation of Indoor Air LADEind air= EPCi„d.air"EF*ED"EP*C2 See TABLE B-10 for Exposure Variables and Rationale and TABLE B-4 for EPC APB Descriptions ELCRind-air= LADEi„ it*UR Total ELCR inda'v— �. ELCRind-arc COC EPCirjr LADEird it UR ELCRind-air EPC2A (Ng/m) (pg/m) (Ng/m) unitless cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7E+01 1.2E+00 NA NC Toluene 2.3E-01 5.5E-03 NA NC Trichloroethene 7.6E+01 1.9E+00 1.7E-06 3.2E-06 Vinyl Chloride 3.0E+01 7.3E-01 8.8E-06 6.4E-06 Total ELCRind-air: 1 E-05 Notes: 1. Only COCs that are detected at this exposure point are displayed. 2. COC=Constituent of Concern; NA= Not Applicable/Not Available; NC= Not Calculated. • \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01_former Sylvania Salem AULNI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Risk(Child Users).xlsWo6L4k0atd*V-e9 TABLE B-15 File No.24926.01 SUMMARY OF TOTAL HAZARD INDICES AND RISK ESTIMATES Page 1 of 1 10/14/2009 Former OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. 60 Boston Street Salem, Massachusetts Excess Receptor Exposure Media/Route Non-Cancer Lifetime Hazard Index Cancer Risk Chronic HI Driver Estimate Driver RECEPTOR: Facility Workers Inhalation of Indoor Air(GZ-E) 0.5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1E-05 Vinyl Chloride Inhalation of Indoor Air(6102-0W) 0.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic 6E-07 Trichloroethene Inhalation of Indoor Air(6105-OW) 0.07 C5-C8 Aliphatic 7E-07 Trichloroethene MAXIMUM for RECEPTOR: Facility Workers: 0.5 1E-05 MCP Risk Limits: 1 1E-05 Exceed MCP Risk Limits? NO NO RECEPTOR: Child Users Inhalation of Indoor Air(GZ-E) 0.2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1E-05 Vinyl Chloride Total for RECEPTOR: Child Users: 0.2 1E-05 MCP Risk Limits: 1 1E-05 Exceed MCP Risk Limits? NO NO Abbreviations: MCP=Massachusetts Contingency Plan. \\Gzanewmarket\jobs\04Jobs\04.0024926.01 former Sylvania Salem AUL\VI Evaluation 2009\24926.01 Summary.xis\SUM RISK QA:CL Date: 10/12/09 • Appendix B • Site Plan Review Decision May 24, 2010 Site Plan Review and Special Permits under the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Overlay District On January 21,2010,the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing for Site Plan Review and Special Permits under the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District(NRCC)to allow an individual retail use of over 3,000 square feet in size, to allow an eating and drinking place within the building's atrium, and to allow fences over six (6) feet in height along the property line), at the request of High Rock Bridge Street, LLC for the property located at 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 BOSTON STREET(Map 15, Lot 305). The proposed project includes the construction of a new two-and four-story professional building with retail and municipal space (Senior Center)on the ground floor level, and • professional offices above with associated parking and landscaping. The Public Hearing was continued to February 4, 2010, February 18,2010, March 4, 2010, March 18, 2010, and April 1, 2010. On April 1, 2010,the Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for a Special Permit under the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Overlay District. The public hearings for Site Plan Review, North River Canal Corridor Special Permits, and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permits were all continued to April 15, 2010, May 6, 2010, and May 20, 2010, and were closed on May 20, 2010. In considering approval of the NRCC Special Permits, the Planning Board finds that the proposed project complies with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Master Plan, as follows: 1. Redevelops a key site in the NRCC, the former Sylvania site. 2. Supports the creation of an "Urban Village" and creates a"Gateway" at the intersection of Bridge and Boston Streets, as articulated in the Master Plan. 3. Improves the sidewalks and pedestrian environment on the corner of Bridge and Boston Streets in front of the project site 4. Includes a"landmark"building at the southeast corner of Bridge and Boston Streets, with active ground floor uses, including a Senior Center and health fitness club, as recommended in the Master Plan) 5. Attracts uses that serve local markets and are complementary to existing businesses 6. Provides sensitive transitions in scale toward the Federal Street neighborhood(while building heights and landscaped buffers are features of the project that require zoning • relief,the elevation and configuration of the property are such that buffering and views are still appropriate) 7. Provides a landscaped buffer at the rear of the parcel. 8. Places new buildings close to the street and at the intersection of Boston and bridge Streets 9. Improves the edges of Bridge Street by through landscaping in addition to the placement of the building. In considering approval of the NRCC Site Plan Review,the Planning Board finds that the development meets the goals of the North River Canal Corridor Plan, as stated in the Salem Zoning Ordinance, as follows: 1. Create appropriate development while preserving our historic neighborhood character The proposed project was unanimously recommended for approval by the Salem Design Review Board(DRB) on April 13, 2010. The DRB's role is to review proposals to ensure they are designed to complement and harmonize with adjacent land uses with respect to architecture, scale, landscaping and screening. The applicant responded to concerns expressed by the DRB about the project's massing,placement of ground floor uses, buffer treatment, the treatment of the corner at Boston and Bridge Streets, the role of the originally proposed atrium, the relationship of various entrances to each other and the pedestrian circulation to and through the building. In a recommendation letter to the . Planning Board dated April 23, 2010,the DRB details how the applicant satisfactorily resolved these problems. 2. Address transportation issues for existing and new developments The developer has agreed to mitigation measures, specified in the conditions below, to address existing traffic congestion problems in the neighborhood. 3. Enhance the public realm in keeping with our unique neighborhood character Improves the sidewalks and pedestrian environment on the corner of Bridge and Boston Streets in front of the project site. The Planning Board considered the requested Special Permit under the NRCC Mixed Use District, Section 8.4.13 Transitional Overlay District: 4)Fences/boundary walls: The maximum height of fences and boundary walls adjacent to residentially zoned or used parcels may be increased to ten(10) feet with Special Permit approval from the Planning Board. The Board finds that the proposed fence heights are appropriate, since they are intended to provide additional buffering between the residential neighborhood and the project, in response to neighborhood concerns. The Planning Board also considered the requested Special Permit under the NRCC Mixed Use District district, Section 8.4.12, Retail Uses: 4) Except by Special Permit, each individual retail use shall not exceed three thousand (3,000) gross square feet in size. The Board finds that the • size is appropriate to the proposed retail use—a health club—which requires more square 2 • footage than many other retail uses, and also finds that the proposed use and its size would not be a detriment to the neighborhood. The original application requested a Special Permit under 8.4.5, specifically 6.2, Restaurants and other eating and drinking places of any size. However, in the course of the review, the plans evolved such that a permanent eating/drinking place was no longer part of the project. The applicant has been encouraged to consider food or beverage cart service on the premises and if desired, such plans should be submitted to the Building Inspector for review and approval or determination as to whether the plans need to be submitted to the Board for review. Lastly, The Planning Board received extensive testimony over several meetings on the topic of subsurface environmental conditions as presented by the applicants Licensed Site Professional. In considering approval of the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit,the Planning Board found that the proposed project met the requirements ents of the Overlay District, as stated in the Salem Zoning Ordinance. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on May 20, 2010, the Planning Board, based on the information contained in the application and presented at the hearings, voted by a vote of eight (8) in favor(Chuck Puleo, Tim Kavanaugh, Tim Ready, Randy Clarke, Christine Sullivan,Nadine Hanscom, Helen Sides and Mark George), none (0) opposed,to approve the Site Plan Review application, the North River Canal Corridor Mixed Use District Special Permits to allow an individual retail use of over 3,000 square feet in size and to allow fences over six (6) feet in height along the property line, and the Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plans Work shall conform to the following plans: a. "Gateway Center: A Multi-Use Building for the Salem Senior Center and Professional Offices, City of Salem Planning Board Final Submission," (6 sheets, unnumbered), dated May 4, 2010,prepared by Gundersen Associates Architects, Salem, MA; and b. "Proposed Gateway Center, 401 Bridge Street," Sheets CS (1), EX(2), DE (3), PL(4), GR(5), UT (6), PH (7), and DET-1 (8), date May 18, 2010,prepared by Hayes Engineering, Inc., Salem, MA. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Maintenance of landscape vegetation shall be the responsibility of the developer,his successors or assigns. • c. The landscaping plan, which was reviewed and recommended by the Design Review Board, is approved by the Planning Board. 3 • 4. Lighting a.No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Electrician for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22,Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of demolition and construction of the project. c. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling,blasting or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. • f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site g. All construction activities shall be in accordance with the"Salem Police Station Construction Management Plan". h. All construction shall take place under the direction and supervision of a Licensed Site Professional in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. I. The applicant shall promptly notify the Board of Health of any environmental condition encountered during construction that may adversely impact the abutters to the site. 6. Design Review Board a. All requirements as set forth by the Design Review Board (DRB) shall be strictly adhered to. Violation of DRB requirements shall be considered a violation of the Site Plan. b. Permission to make changes from the approved site plan and drawings must be requested by the Applicant in writing to the City Planner,who will reply in writing giving her approval or disapproval of the changes. No changes in the work are to be undertaken until such approval has been obtained. c. Details on exterior building lighting, street lighting, sidewalk treatment, rooftop/mechanical screening, signage, canopies, and clarifications on the landscaping plantings (including the proposed field grass by the Boston Street entrance and the caliper of the proposed evergreens) are to be submitted as part of the final construction drawings to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation to the City Planner for approval,prior • to issuance of a building permit. 7. Conservation Commission 4 � � r • a. All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Conservation Commission b. The applicant shall receive all necessary approvals from the Salem Conservation Commission. 8. Traffic Mitigation— Proposed plans and details of the mitigation measures below are to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer, City Electrician, City Planner, and the Traffic Division of the Salem Police Department. The developer will implement the following traffic mitigation measures prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: a. Boston Street at Bridge Street: ■ Signal timing adjustments to improve traffic flow; the Applicant's engineer is to consider timing to allow cars to go left onto Proctor Street. ■ Construct an exclusive right-turn lane on Boston Street for the northbound approach (providing three approach lanes to allow a through-left lane, through lane, and right-turn-only lane) ■ Pedestrian signals are to be installed at the intersection of Boston and Bridge Streets. Design and location are to be submitted by the applicant to the City Engineer, the Traffic Division of the Salem Police Department, City Electrician and City Planner for review and approval. b. Bridge Street at Flint Street ■ Signal timing adjustments to improve traffic flow • 9. Maintenance of Stormwater System Applicant is to submit an Operations and Management Plan for the stormwater system, including a narrative describing the frequency of cleaning and maintenance of catch basins and Stormceptors and clearly define responsible party for maintenance, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Board of Health The owner shall comply with the following specific conditions issued by the Board of Health: a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name,address, and telephone number of the project(site) manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan,no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible for the site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use. c. A copy of the Licensed Asbestos Inspector's Report must be sent to the Health Agent. d. A copy of the Demolition Notice sent to the DEP, Form BWPAO6, must be sent to the Health Agent. e. The developer shall give the Health Agent a copy of the 21 E report. f. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer. g. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior • to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent. h. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. 5 • i. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and street sweeping which will occur during construction. j. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and removal of debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated during demolition and/or construction. k. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting. 1. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations, including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. in. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill material needed for the project. n. The resultant establishment shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operation in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of health. o. The drainage system for this project must be reviewed and approved by the Northeast Mosquito Control and Wetlands Management District. p. Proposed food establishments must have their plans reviewed by the Health Agent prior to their build out. q. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. 11. Fire Department • All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department, including the following conditions: a. The Applicant's engineer shall submit written confirmation that the turning radii on the site comply with all manufacturer's specifications of the Salem Fire Department's fire apparatus,prior to issuance of a building permit. b. Should dumpsters be required on the site (outside the building), the Applicant is to submit revised plans for approval by the City Planner. c. The Applicant is to submit a snow storage plan to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. Building Inspector All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector. 13. Utilities Underground utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 14. City Engineer a. The condition of the existing drainage sections to be connected to the site drainage will be confirmed by television inspection prior to construction, and the Applicant is to take appropriate measures based on these results, as approved by the City Engineer. • 6 b. The roof drain shall discharge directly into the existing drainage system, with the final location to be agreed to by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. c. There will not be any infiltration of parking lot runoff on the site due to the site having contamination. 15.Exterior Elevations Elevations shall be in accordance with the approved plans. 16. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. c. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant,his successors or assigns. 17.As-built Plans As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Engineering Department prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. 18.Violations II Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board,unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant,his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Charles M. Puleo, Chairman • 7 5/20/2010 CITY OF SALEM - FY 2011 OPERATING BUDGET Expenditures Adopted Budget Adjusted Budget Y-T-D Expenses Department Mayor 12:27:47PM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Health-Personnel 15101 5111 SALARIES-FULL TIME 264,599.07 304,391.00 297,391.00 215,495.18 306,767.00 306,767.00 15101 5113 SALARIES-PART TIME 18,190.89 24,482.00 29,482.00 17,539.33 24,342.00 24,342.00 15101 5131 OVERTIME(GENERAL) 3,123.09 2,000.00 4,000.00 2,510.32 1,750.00 1,750.00 15101 5150 FRINGE/STIPENDS 3,900.00 4,750.00 4,750.00 4,750.00 4,750.00 4,750.00 Total Health-Personnel 289,813.05 335,623.00 335,623.00 240,294.83 337,609.00 337,609.00 0.59% Health-Expenses 15102 5306 ADVERTISING 660.70 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 15102 5318 DENTAL/MEDICAL SERVI 2,782.81 3,600.00 3,600.00 1,876.95 3,600.00 3,600.00 15102 5320 CONTRACTED SERVICES 382.50 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 15102 5396 HOUSING-SAN 4,509.19 5,000.00 5,000.00 2,558.43 5,000.00 5,000.00 15102 5421 OFFICE SUPPLIES(GEN 2,799.98 2,800.00 2,800.00 2,399.96 2,800.00 2,800.00 15102 5710 IN STATE TRAVEL/MEETINGS 2,257.69 5,000.00 5,000.00 1,095.97 5,000.00 5,000.00 15102 5785 RODENT CONTROL 1,325.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 875.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 15102 5786 BEACH WATER ANALYSIS 65.00 800.00 800.00 235.65 800.00 800.00 Total Health-Expenses 14,782.87 21,200.00 21,200.00 10,041.96 21,200.00 21,200.00 0.00% 120 510 Department Total 304,595.92 356,823.00 356,823.00 250,336.79 358,809.00 358,809.00 0.56% _....................... .__- FY 2011 MANAGEMENT,BOARD MEMBERS AND PART-TIME SALARIES Name Dept Name OrglObj Job Dese H've Dale Council Code F #Hours #Board Dept Rate Dept Rate Dept Request Dept-10%Reduction Mayor FY 2010 T Wkly=1 Meetings FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2011 E 2.0% 2.0Y. 52.2 52.2 LYONS HEATHER 120 HEALTH 15101-5111 BOARD CLERK 2.000.00 B 4 500.00 500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2.000.00 120 HEALTH 15101-5111 HEALTH AGENT 65.348.60 1.0 1 1,276.93 1,276.93 66,655.75 66.655.75 66.655.75 Requested 10%budget cul-No Health Agent for 3 Weeks (8,569.00) 237,041.96 5.0 Total AFSCME 1818 238.110.36 235.110.36 238.110.86 304.390.56 6.0 Total FuBTime-5111 306,769.60 298,197.60 306,766.60 KEOUGH JENNIFER 120 HEALTH 15101-5113 PT CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 24,481.59 19 hours per vA 24.68 - To FT To FT To FT REALE JOSEPH 120 HEALTH 15101.5113 PT CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER - 9.5 hours per v* 25.00 25.00 12.350.00 12.350.00 CODY ROBERTA 120 HEALTH 15101,5113 PT CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 9.5 hours per v* 25.00 25.00 11,992.00 11,992.00 24.48159 Total PartTime.5113 24,342.00 24,342.00 120 HEALTH 15101-5131 Overtime 2,000.00 1750.00 1.750.00 1.750.00 120 HEALTH 15101-5150 AFSCMEStipend 4,750.00 5.0 950.00 950.00 4,750.00 4.750.00 4,750.00 335,622.19 6.0 Department Total 337,608.60 304 697.60 337 608.60 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 variance Full-Time Equivalent Employees: 8.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 FY 2011 AFSCME Union Employee Rates JEMPLOYEE NAME I..,..dreent lo,,O,-, Job Title Hire Budget 1 F Rate Rate STEP INCREASES D R Dept 10% apt equost Reduction Mayor LONGEVRY Date FY 2010 T FY 2010 FY 2011 Date Rate 0 W ks FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2a11 52.2 E 2.0% 0.0% Old New 52.252.2 52.2 MANCINI JANET 120 HEALTH 151015111 SR.SANITARIAN 5110N 52,315.09 0.0 - Resigned GIARLA TRACY 120 HEALTH 151015111 PUB HLTH NURSE 11/12/1998 49,418.95 1.0 946.72 946.72 49.418.95 49.418.95 49.418.95 GREENBAUM DAVID 120 HEALTH 15101-5111 SR.SANITARIAN 11/03/03 48,682.75 1.0 932.62 1.00221 52,315.36 52.315.36 52,315.36 LYONS HEATHER 120 HEALTH 15101-5111 PRINCIPAL CLERK 10112104 41,606.99 1.0 797.07 797.07 41.606.99 41,606.99 41,606.99 SALANDREA ELIZABETH 120 HEALTH 151015111 SANITARIAN STEPIII 117=8 45.018.17 1.0 932.62 932.62 48,682.76 48,682.76 48.682.76 KEOUGH JENNIFER 120 HEALTH 15101-5111 CODE ENFOFFSTEP IV01 11125R009 1.0 864.11 B6t.11 11/25/2010 897.68 23.0 292 46.086.79 46.086.79 46,0B6.79 237,041.96 5.0 238,11016 238,110.86 238,110.86 y T Z FY 2011 DETAILED BUDGET REPORT EXPENSES HEALTH-120 ORG OBJECT DESCRIPTION Dept Request 10% 15102 5306 ADVERTISING Dept Request Cut Approved by Mayor Public Health alerts,such as for Seasonal Flu,Avian Flu,other contagious diseases and legal notices required for regulations. 1,000 TOTAL 1,000 1,000 15102 5318 'DENTALlMEDICAL SERVICES 1,000 1,000 1,000 Influenza Clinic supplies including 12 boxes Sensicare sterile gloves,1 carton Curad bandages,20 boxes alcohol wipes,10 sharps containers,12 boxes 3cc 23G 1"syringes, NIOSH N95 masks,4 Epipens,7 ice packs,10 packs 1X1's Other general medical supplies as needed 1,000 1,000 1,000 TOTAL 2,600 2,000 2,600 15102 5320 CONTRACTED SERVICES 3,600 3,000 3,600 TOTAL Fees for expert consultants to review new pool and septic system plans. 1,000 1,000 1,000 15102 5396 HOUSINGISAN 1,000 1,000 1,000 Educational Conferences:Contagious diseases,inspections,emergency preparedness, Inspectional Equipment such as stem type thermometers,flashlights,batteries, 40 700 5 License for computerized inspection module 540 540 540 litmus paper,file,cameral supplies,hardware supplies 425 425 425 Codes from Mass DEP and MDPH 1,160 1,160 1,160 Professional Membership for 7 employees:MHOA,APHA,MPHA,NEHA,NALBOH 300 300 300 newspaper 1,200 1,200 1,200 Beach signs,pool test kits,instructional videos 175 175 175 TOTAL 500 200 500 15102 5421 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5,000 4,000 5,000 General Office Supplies as needed TOTAL 2,800 2,700 2,800 15102 5710 IN STATE TRAVEL 2,800 2,700 2,800 Mileage reimbursement for 3 employes @$1500 each,per contract 4,500 Mileage reimbursement for travel outside of Salem 3,500 4,500 TOTAL 500 500 500 15102 5785 RODENT CONTROL 5,000 4,000 5,000 20 professional exterminations @$100 each TOTAL 2,000 2,000 2,000 15102 5786 BEACH WATER ANALYSIS 2,000 2,000 2,000 Bacterial analysis of swimming water TOTAL 800 800 800 800 800 800 TOTAL PROPOSED 21,200 18,500 21,200