Loading...
328 Essex St ReportDavid M. Hart Enterprises 104 Federal Street • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • 978.745.2172 davidatsalem@comcast.net fax: 978.740.0085 www.dmharchitects.com June 8, 2016 Patti Kelleher Salem City Hall Planning 120 Washington Street Salem MA 01970 RE: Report on site visit to 328 Essex St., Salem Mass. June 7, 2016. Dear Patti: Below is my report. See also the graphic 328 Essex St.pdf. The building is brick bearing wall construction reportedly constructed in 1823. A close inspection indicates that in all probability the majority of the masonry is of the original construction, exhibiting relatively uniform thin mortar joints, rather uniformly eroded back about a quarter of an inch. There has been a minor amount of repointing with a hard cement mortar rather white in color and brought out about flush with the face of the brick. The majority of the mortar appears to be a rather soft lime based mortar which is for the most part intact. The brick itself is relatively clean, and the original mortar joints have a slight amount mount of soiling on the surface. My recommendations are following: Façade masonry cleaning. Since the surface areas are relatively clean, I would not recommend cleaning the masonry. However if it is so desired, the use of Prosoco Sure Klean heavy-duty restoration cleaner appropriately diluted, would seem to be the best choice. Repointing. It is understood that there are a few small areas exhibiting voids that are desired to be reported. I would recommend a type K mortar: “This uses a 1 / 3 / 10 mix (white cement, hydrated lime and sand) and results in a mortar with but a 75 psi compressive strength. Type K is useful only in historic preservation situations where load bearing strength is not of importance and the porous qualities of this mortar allows very little movement due to temperature and moisture fluctuations. This aids in prolonging the integrity of the old or even ancient bricks in historic structures.” Normally after placing the mortar, a Prosoco Sure Klean 600 acid wash is normally used to expose the aggregate. In this case I am not sure since the areas to be repaired are so small, this is necessary. In terms of applying a sealer to the masonry I would not recommending using any sealer, as unless there is a significant amount of moisture penetration to the interior a sealer is not necessary, and even if it was applied, it would have to be reapplied every 6 to 10 years. Current practice does not recommend applying a sealer unless absolutely necessary. Publications that deal with the issues of masonry repairs and repointing include the National Park Services’ Preservation Brief No. 1 Cleaning and Water-Repellent Treatments for Historic Masonry Buildings Preservation Brief No. 2 Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings These can be found on the internet at https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs or just Google “preservation briefs”. Sincerely, David M. Hart, AIA