The URL can be used to link to this page

MEPA ENF - Salem Willows Pier-1of2 (07.30.2021) cover, form, narrative An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/V/H ***TRANSMITTAL VIA EMAIL July 30, 2021*** July 30, 2021 File No. 18.0174941.00 Kathleen A. Theoharides Secretary of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 Re: Environmental Notification Form DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 200 Fort Avenue Salem, Massachusetts Dear Secretary Theoharides: On behalf of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game, Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF, Proponent), GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. is submitting this Environmental Notification Form (ENF) for the subject property. This application is being filed in accordance with the requirements of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act. Initial electronic or hard copy submittal of this ENF was made to the required agencies listed on the Electronic Distribution List document, revised 5/19/21. A filing distribution list is provided in Attachment 7 of the ENF. The project site is located near the north tip of Salem Neck, on property owned by the City of Salem (City), known as Salem Willows Park (Site). MDMF is proposing the removal and replacement of the existing, severely damaged pier structure (Project). The new recreational fishing pier will be designed to improve accessibility, safety, functionality, aesthetic appeal, and resiliency, while minimizing adverse environmental impacts. The Project involves the construction of a pile-supported or bottom-anchored structure of 2,000 or more square feet of base area occupying flowed tidelands or other waterways and is therefore subject to MEPA review in accordance with 301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)(6). Additional information on the proposed project is presented in the Project Narrative included in the ENF. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal, or if you require additional information, please contact our office at (781) 278-4806. Sincerely, GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. David A. Smith Senior Project Manager Attachments CC: MDMF, City of Salem, Distribution List ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 200 Fort Avenue Salem, Massachusetts July 2021 GZA File No. 18.0174941.00 PREPARED FOR: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game Division of Marine Fisheries 251 Causeway Street, Suite 400 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 144 Elm Street │ Amesbury, MA 01913 781-278-4800 31 Offices Nationwide www.gza.com Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office Effective January 2011 Environmental Notification Form For Office Use Only EEA#: MEPA Analyst: The information requested on this form must be completed in order to submit a document electronically for review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00. Project Name: DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park Street Address: 200 Fort Avenue Municipality: Salem Watershed: North Coastal Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates:Latitude: 42°32’11.98” N Longitude: 70°52’5.34” W Estimated commencement date:Fall 2021 Estimated completion date:Spring 2023 Project Type:Rec. Pier Replacement Status of project design: 75 %complete Proponent: Massachusetts Dept. of Fish & Game, Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF) Street Address: 251 Causeway Street, Suite 400 Municipality:Boston State: MA Zip Code:02114 Name of Contact Person:David A. Smith, Senior Project Manager Firm/Agency:GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Street Address:144 Elm Street Municipality:Amesbury State: MA Zip Code:01913 Phone: 781-278-4806 Fax: E-mail: david.smith@gza.com Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03)? Yes No If this is an Expanded Environmental Notification Form (ENF) (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) or a Notice of Project Change (NPC), are you requesting: a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) Yes No a Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) Yes No a Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes No a Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes No (Note: Greenhouse Gas Emissions analysis must be included in the Expanded ENF.) Which MEPA review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03)? 301 CMR 11.03(3)(b)(6) Which State Agency Permits will the project require? Chapter 91 License, DEP Waterways; Order of Conditions, DEP Wetlands Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an Agency of the Commonwealth, including the Agency name and the amount of funding or land area in acres: Project is being funded by the Massachusetts Dept. of Fish & Game, Division of Marine - 2 - Fisheries (MDMF) and the City of Salem, Massachusetts (City). Anticipated funding distribution is approximately $2M from MDMF and $1.5M from the City; for an estimated total construction budget of approximately $3.5M. However, the construction budget and cost share are subject to review/change based on recent increases in the cost of labor and materials. Summary of Project Size & Environmental Impacts Existing Change Total LAND Total site acreage ±23.56 ac New acres of land altered N/A Acres of impervious area ±0.27 ac N/A ±0.27 ac Square feet of new bordering vegetated wetlands alteration N/A Square feet of new other wetland alteration ±210 s.f. Acres of new non-water dependent use of tidelands or waterways N/A STRUCTURES Gross square footage N/A N/A N/A Number of housing units N/A N/A N/A Maximum height (feet) N/A N/A N/A TRANSPORTATION Vehicle trips per day N/A N/A N/A Parking spaces N/A N/A N/A WASTEWATER Water Use (Gallons per day) N/A N/A N/A Water withdrawal (GPD) N/A N/A N/A Wastewater generation/treatment (GPD) N/A N/A N/A Length of water mains (miles) N/A N/A N/A Length of sewer mains (miles) N/A N/A N/A Has this project been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EEA # ) No Has any project on this site been filed with MEPA before? Yes (EEA # ) No - 3 - GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION – all proponents must fill out this section PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Describe the existing conditions and land uses on the project site: The existing site is located at the north end of Salem Neck, on the property of Salem Willows Park, a City-owned public open space, primarily used for recreation.The park includes maintained lawns and trees, benches, picnic tables, restroom facilities, gazebos, sports fields, tennis and basketball courts, public parking, public beaches and rocky shoreline, networks of paved and unpaved paths, and a pile-supported pier. The existing pier extends approximately 345 linear feet from its land-side access, in an east-northeast direction. The deck of the existing pier connects to land at existing grade in a paved area in the north of Salem Willows Park. The pier’s pile and post supports, framing, bracing, railing, and decking are constructed of timber. The deck is roughly level, ranging in height from approximately elevation 9 to 10 feet (NAVD88), and varies from approximately 8 to 22 feet wide.A pier of similar size, shape, orientation and general character has existed in the current pier location for more than 100 years; however, the pier has likely been reconstructed and repaired extensively since the original construction. The current structure experienced significant damage during storm events in October 2012 (Hurricane Sandy) and February 2013 (winter storm Nemo). Due to the damaged and deteriorating conditions and corresponding concerns for public safety, the pier has been closed or partially open, with restricted access to the public since 2013. Additional information regarding the existing site conditions is included in the attached Project Narrative. Describe the proposed project and its programmatic and physical elements: MDMF is proposing the removal and replacement of the existing pier structure. The proposed Project will occur in two general phases: Phase 1 – Demolition and Phase 2 - Construction. Phase 1 – Demolition involves the demolition, complete removal (or removal to the extent practical), and legal disposal of all remaining structural and peripheral elements of the existing pier. Phase 2 – Construction will follow the successful completion of Phase 1. The proposed pier will be constructed in roughly the same footprint and alignment and will extend about the same horizontal distance from shore as the existing pier structure. The proposed work also includes the replacement of the existing gangway hoist (“gallows”) frame located off the north side of the pier. Phase 2 includes the installation of 76 new piles, total. Approximately 72 plumb piles will be installed to support the proposed pier and 4 piles (2 plumb and 2 batter) will be installed to support the gangway hoist frame off the north side of the pier. Construction of the pier superstructure will follow or potentially overlap pile installation. The proposed pier superstructure will consist of three significant elements: a land-side access ramp and stair system, a main pier, and a terminal T-pier. A timber or concrete access ramp and stair system will be constructed within an existing paved area at the landward end of the pier to provide ADA-compliant access to the new elevated pier deck while maintaining existing surrounding grades and surface materials. The proposed main pier will extend seaward from the proposed access ramp and stair system. The main pier will be approximately 330 feet long and 12 feet wide. The proposed terminal T-pier will be approximately 60 feet long and 16 feet wide, centered about its length and perpendicular to the alignment of the main pier. A railing system will be installed continuously around the perimeter of the pier deck. The new recreational fishing pier will be designed to improve accessibility, safety, functionality, aesthetic appeal, and resiliency, while minimizing adverse environmental and societal impacts. Additional information regarding the proposed Project is included in the attached Project Narrative. NOTE: The project description should summarize both the project’s direct and indirect impacts (including construction period impacts) in terms of their magnitude, geographic extent, duration and frequency, and reversibility, as applicable. It should also discuss the infrastructure requirements of the project and the capacity of the municipal and/or regional infrastructure to sustain these - 4 - requirements into the future. Describe the on-site project alternatives (and alternative off-site locations, if applicable), considered by the proponent, including at least one feasible alternative that is allowed under current zoning, and the reasons(s) that they were not selected as the preferred alternative: Alternatives that were considered for the project included “Do Nothing,” In-Kind Reconstruction (or Repair), and Pier Replacement. Additional details regarding the project alternatives are included in the attached Project Narrative. NOTE: The purpose of the alternatives analysis is to consider what effect changing the parameters and/or siting of a project, or components thereof, will have on the environment, keeping in mind that the objective of the MEPA review process is to avoid or minimize damage to the environment to the greatest extent feasible. Examples of alternative projects include alternative site locations, alternative site uses, and alternative site configurations. Summarize the mitigation measures proposed to offset the impacts of the preferred alternative: The Project will involve the recovery and removal of treated timber products used to construct the existing pier, which will significantly reduce or prevent additional adverse impacts associated with the materials. The Project will remove an existing, severely damaged and deteriorating, unsafe, and currently closed public access structure and replace the existing with an improved, more resilient, attractive, functioning structure. The deck of the proposed structure corresponds to an approximately 2,500 square foot net reduction in pile-supported surface area and will be elevated approximately three feet above the existing deck to be demolished and removed. In addition to the structural advantages associated with the design improvements, the proposed structure will reduce the adverse shading effects of the existing structure. The proposed structure is located within or as near to the existing structures footprint as feasible, to limit new impacts to currently unaltered wetland resource areas. The Project will reduce the total number of piles from the approximately 176 existing to 76 proposed. Additionally, 14 of the 76 new piles will be located entirely within an existing man-made stone mound (armored Coastal Beach and Rocky Intertidal Shore) to remain, further reducing the additional environmental impact of the proposed Project. The land-side access system will be constructed within existing paved areas with insignificant modifications to existing grades. Additional information regarding the proposed mitigation associated with the Project is included in the attached Project Narrative. If the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, please describe each phase: The proposed Project is divided into two phases: Phase 1 – Demolition and Phase 2 – Construction. Description of the Project phases is provided in the above sections of this form and additional information is included in the attached Project Narrative. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project within or adjacent to an Area of Critical Environmental Concern? Yes (Specify__________________________________) No if yes, does the ACEC have an approved Resource Management Plan? ___ Yes ___ No; If yes, describe how the project complies with this plan. _______________________________________________________ Will there be stormwater runoff or discharge to the designated ACEC? ___ Yes ____ No; If yes, describe and assess the potential impacts of such stormwater runoff/discharge to the designated ACEC. _________________________________________________ RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated and/or Priority Habitat of State-Listed Rare Species? (see http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/regulatory_review/priority_habitat/priority_habitat_home.htm) Yes (Specify__________________________________ ) No - 5 - HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or district listed in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? Yes (MHC#s: SAL.GZ; SAL.HA; SAL.929; SAL.963 through SAL.970; SAL.3702; SAL.3703; SAL.3882; ) No If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeological resources? Yes (MHC# SAL.965 Willow Pier) No WATER RESOURCES: Is there an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW) on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? ___Yes _X_No; if yes, identify the ORW and its location. ______________________________________________ (NOTE: Outstanding Resource Waters include Class A public water supplies, their tributaries, and bordering wetlands; active and inactive reservoirs approved by MassDEP; certain waters within Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, and certified vernal pools. Outstanding resource waters are listed in the Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00.) Are there any impaired water bodies on or within a half-mile radius of the project site? __X_Yes ___No; if yes, identify the water body and pollutant(s) causing the impairment: Beverly Harbor (Fecal Coliform); Salem Harbor (Estuarine Bioassessments, Enterococcus, Fecal Coliform) Is the project within a medium or high stress basin, as established by the Massachusetts Water Resources Commission? ___Yes _X_No STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Generally describe the project's stormwater impacts and measures that the project will take to comply with the standards found in MassDEP's Stormwater Management Regulations: Stormwater impacts associated with the project are expected to be minor. Potential sediment sources generated during construction will be contained using erosion and sediment control BMPs. The proposed project will comply with the standards found in the Stormwater Management Regulations to the maximum extent possible. MASSACHUSETTS CONTINGENCY PLAN: Has the project site been, or is it currently being, regulated under M.G.L.c.21E or the Massachusetts Contingency Plan? Yes ___ No X ; if yes, please describe the current status of the site (including Release Tracking Number (RTN), cleanup phase, and Response Action Outcome classification):__________________ Is there an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) on any portion of the project site? Yes ___ No _X__; if yes, describe which portion of the site and how the project will be consistent with the AUL: _____________________. Are you aware of any Reportable Conditions at the property that have not yet been assigned an RTN? Yes ___ No _X_ ; if yes, please describe:____________________________________ SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE: If the project will generate solid waste during demolition or construction, describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal of, e.g., asphalt, brick, concrete, gypsum, metal, wood: The Project will generate solid waste from demolition and new construction. The solid waste will primarily include treated and untreated wood products with significantly lesser proportions metals, concrete, asphalt pavement and typical construction-related waste. The condition of the existing wood elements to be demolished varies significantly and potential for re-use is limited. Metal waste generated by demolition and construction are expected to be minor relative to the wood waste and may be salvaged, re-used, recycled or otherwise disposed of by the Contractor. Solid waste generated from the Project will be managed and disposed of by the Contractor at an approved facility. - 6 - (NOTE: Asphalt pavement, brick, concrete and metal are banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills and waste combustion facilities and wood is banned from disposal at Massachusetts landfills. See 310 CMR 19.017 for the complete list of banned materials.) Will your project disturb asbestos containing materials? Yes ___ No _X__ ; if yes, please consult state asbestos requirements at http://mass.gov/MassDEP/air/asbhom01.htm Describe anti-idling and other measures to limit emissions from construction equipment: Contractors will be required to limit emissions from construction equipment and idling of equipment will be kept to a minimum. DESIGNATED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER: Is this project site located wholly or partially within a defined river corridor of a federally designated Wild and Scenic River or a state designated Scenic River? Yes ___ No X ; if yes, specify name of river and designation: If yes, does the project have the potential to impact any of the “outstandingly remarkable” resources of a federally Wild and Scenic River or the stated purpose of a state designated Scenic River? Yes ___ No _X_ ; if yes, specify name of river and designation: _____________; if yes, will the project will result in any impacts to any of the designated “outstandingly remarkable” resources of the Wild and Scenic River or the stated purposes of a Scenic River. Yes ___ No ___ ; if yes,describe the potential impacts to one or more of the “outstandingly remarkable” resources or stated purposes and mitigation measures proposed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. List of all attachments to this document. 2. U.S.G.S. map (good quality color copy, 8-½ x 11 inches or larger, at a scale of 1:24,000) indicating the project location and boundaries. 3.. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions on the project site and its immediate environs, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, railroad rights-of-way, wetlands and water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major utilities. 4 Plan, at an appropriate scale, depicting environmental constraints on or adjacent to the project site such as Priority and/or Estimated Habitat of state-listed rare species, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Chapter 91 jurisdictional areas, Article 97 lands, wetland resource area delineations, water supply protection areas, and historic resources and/or districts. 5. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if construction of the project is proposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion of each phase). 6. List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordance with 301 CMR 11.16(2). 7. List of municipal and federal permits and reviews required by the project, as applicable. - 7 - LAND SECTION – all proponents must fill out this section I. Thresholds / Permits A. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1) ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify each threshold: II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows: Existing Change Total Footprint of buildings 0.17 ___ -(0.05) 0.12 Internal roadways ________ 0.00_____ ________ Parking and other paved areas 0.27_____ 0.00_____ 0.27____ Other altered areas ________ 0.00_____ ________ Undeveloped areas ________ 0.00_____ ________ Total: Project Site Acreage ±23.56 _________ ±23.56 __ B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last five years? ___ Yes X No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with prime state or locally important agricultural soils) will be converted to nonagricultural use? C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use? ___ Yes X No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate whether any part of the site is the subject of a forest management plan approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation: D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ___ Yes X No; if yes, describe: E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? _X_ Yes___ No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? ___ Yes X No; if yes, describe: F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental change in an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? ___ Yes X No; if yes, describe: G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121B? Yes ___ No X ; if yes, describe: III.Consistency A. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan Title:__________________________ Date___________________ B. Describe the project’s consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development _______________________ 2) adequacy of infrastructure _____________________ 3) open space impacts ___________________________ 4) compatibility with adjacent land uses_______________ C. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency (RPA) RPA: Metropolitan Area Planning Council - 8 - Title: MetroFuture: Making a Greater Boston Region Date_May 2008 D. Describe the project’s consistency with that plan with regard to: 1) economic development The proposed project will provide short term job opportunities and business during the construction process. Following construction the area will benefit from the investment in the communities open space for the public benefit, and the recreational use of visitors and locals. 2) adequacy of infrastructure The project intent is to remove currently inadequate and unbeneficial public infrastructure and replace it with public infrastructure that is improved with respect to accessibility, environmental impact, functionality, resiliency, and public safety. 3) open space impacts The proposed project will remove a severely damaged, deteriorating, unsafe and consequently closed publically-accessible recreational pier and replace the pier with an improved structure to enhance and improve the existing open space surrounding the pier (Salem Willows Park and District). - 9 - RARE SPECIES SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see 301 CMR 11.03(2))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: (NOTE: If you are uncertain, it is recommended that you consult with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) prior to submitting the ENF.) B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? ___ Yes X No C. Does the project site fall within mapped rare species habitat (Priority or Estimated Habitat?) in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? ___ Yes X No. D. If you answered "No" to all questions A, B and C, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Rare Species section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? ___ Yes ___ No. If yes, 1. Have you consulted with the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP)? ___Yes ___No; if yes, have you received a determination as to whether the project will result in the “take” of a rare species? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach the letter of determination to this submission. 2. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate rare species impacts 3. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat? 4. Has the site been surveyed for rare species in accordance with the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act? ___ Yes ___ No 4. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an Order of Conditions for this project? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, did you send a copy of the Notice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? ___ Yes ___ No B. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, provide a summary of proposed measures to minimize and mitigate impacts to significant habitat: - 10 - WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, and tidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? X Yes ___ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: The Project includes the construction of a pile-supported or bottom-anchored structure of 2,000 or more square feet of base area occupying flowed tidelands or other waterways and is therefore subject to MEPA review in accordance with 301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)(6). The existing pile supported pier to be demolished and removed is approximately 7,416 square feet in area. The proposed replacement pier (including the access ramp/stair within LSCSF) will be approximately 5,113 square feet in area. B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands, waterways, or tidelands? X Yes ___ No; if yes, specify which permit: The project will require a Chapter 91 License from the MassDEP Waterways Regulation Program and local Order of Conditions from the Salem Conservation Commission. C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands, Waterways, and Tidelands Section below. II. Wetlands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (M.G.L. c.131A)? X Yes ___ No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed? ___ Yes X No; if yes, list the date and MassDEP file number: ______; if yes, has a local Order of Conditions been issued? ___ Yes ___ No; Was the Order of Conditions appealed? ___ Yes ___ No. Will the project require a Variance from the Wetlands regulations? ___ Yes X No. B. Describe any proposed permanent or temporary impacts to wetland resource areas located on the project site: The proposed work involves the demolition of an existing, damaged, public-access pier and replacement with an improved public-access pier, in roughly the same footprint. Temporary impacts will be minimized and generally limited to unavoidable construction access measures and proposed demolition activity during the period of physical work on site. Permanent impacts will be minimized, but include unavoidable alteration of LSCSF, Coastal Bank, Coastal Beach/Rocky Intertidal Shore, Land Containing Shellfish, and Land Under the Ocean. The result of the proposed work will be a net reduction of permanent impacts (mitigation) by the removal of existing structures and replacement with an improved structure of a smaller overall footprint. C. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, and indicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent: Coastal Wetlands Area (square feet) or Temporary or Length (linear feet) Permanent Impact? Land Under the Ocean ± 106 s.f. (permanent) Designated Port Areas _________________ ___________________ Coastal Beaches ± 28 s.f. (permanent, overlaps Rocky Intertidal 100%) Coastal Dunes _________________ ____________________ Barrier Beaches _________________ ____________________ Coastal Banks ± 24 l.f. (temporary), ± 14 l.f.(permanent) Rocky Intertidal Shores ± 28 s.f. (permanent, overlaps Coastal Beach 100%) Salt Marshes _________________ ____________________ Land Under Salt Ponds _________________ ____________________ Land Containing Shellfish ±35 s.f. (permanent, overlaps others entirely) - 11 - Fish Runs _________________ ____________________ Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage __±11,705 s.f. (temporary)_±210 s.f. (permanent) Inland Wetlands Bank (lf) _________________ ____________________ Bordering Vegetated Wetlands _________________ ____________________ Isolated Vegetated Wetlands _________________ ____________________ Land under Water _________________ ____________________ Isolated Land Subject to Flooding _________________ ____________________ Borderi ng Land Subject to Flooding _________________ ____________________ Riverfront Area _________________ ____________________ D. Is any part of the project: 1. proposed as a limited project? ___ Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (in sf)?____ 2. the construction or alteration of a dam? ___ Yes X No; if yes, describe: 3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? X Yes ___ No 4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? ___ Yes X No; if yes, describe the volume of dredged material and the proposed disposal site: 5. a discharge to an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW) or an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)? ___ Yes X No 6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? ___ Yes X No; if yes, identify the area (in sf): 7. located in buffer zones? X Yes No; if yes, how much (in sf): Entirety of project will occur in existing coastal wetland resource areas; approximately 19,331 square feet. E. Will the project: 1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? X Yes ___ No 2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state law? ___ Yes X No; if yes, what is the area (sf)? III. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and Permits A. Does the project site contain waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands) that are subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? X Yes ___ No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91 License or Permit affecting the project site? X Yes ___ No; if yes, list the date and license or permit number and provide a copy of the historic map used to determine extent of filled tidelands: Massachusetts Harbor and Land Commissioners License No. 1733, recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds on 12/12/1894 (Copy Attached). C. Does the project require a new or modified license or permit under M.G.L.c.91? X Yes ___ No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water- dependent use? Current ±23.56 ac Change _0_ Total ±23.56 ac If yes, how many square feet of solid fill or pile-supported structures (in sf)? Land-side pier access structure (ramp and stairs): ±210 s.f. Pile-supported recreational pier: ±4,903 s.f. Seasonally-installed floating dock: ±800 s.f. C. For non-water-dependent use projects, indicate the following: Area of filled tidelands on the site:_____________________ Area of filled tidelands covered by buildings:____________ For portions of site on filled tidelands, list ground floor uses and area of each use: ______________ - 12 - Does the project include new non-water-dependent uses located over flowed tidelands? Yes ___ No ___ Height of building on filled tidelands________________ Also show the following on a site plan: Mean High Water, Mean Low Water, Water- dependent Use Zone, location of uses within buildings on tidelands, and interior and exterior areas and facilities dedicated for public use, and historic high and historic low water marks. D. Is the project located on landlocked tidelands? ___ Yes X No; if yes, describe the project’s impact on the public’s right to access, use and enjoy jurisdictional tidelands and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: E. Is the project located in an area where low groundwater levels have been identified by a municipality or by a state or federal agency as a threat to building foundations? ___Yes X No; if yes, describe the project’s impact on groundwater levels and describe measures the project will implement to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse impact: F. Is the project non-water-dependent and located on landlocked tidelands or waterways or tidelands subject to the Waterways Act and subject to a mandatory EIR? ___ Yes X No; (NOTE: If yes, then the project will be subject to Public Benefit Review and Determination.) G. Does the project include dredging? ___ Yes X No; if yes, answer the following questions: What type of dredging? Improvement ___ Maintenance ___ Both ____ What is the proposed dredge volume, in cubic yards (cys) _________ What is the proposed dredge footprint ____length (ft) ___width (ft)____depth (ft); Will dredging impact the following resource areas? Intertidal Yes__ No__; if yes, ___ sq ft Outstanding Resource Waters Yes__ No__; if yes, ___ sq ft Other resource area (i.e. shellfish beds, eel grass beds) Yes__ No__; if yes __ sq ft If yes to any of the above, have you evaluated appropriate and practicable steps to: 1) avoidance; 2) if avoidance is not possible, minimization; 3) if either avoidance or minimize is not possible, mitigation? If no to any of the above, what information or documentation was used to support this determination? Provide a comprehensive analysis of practicable alternatives for improvement dredging in accordance with 314 CMR 9.07(1)(b). Physical and chemical data of the sediment shall be included in the comprehensive analysis. Sediment Characterization Existing gradation analysis results? __Yes ___No: if yes, provide results. Existing chemical results for parameters listed in 314 CMR 9.07(2)(b)6? ___Yes ____No; if yes, provide results. Do you have sufficient information to evaluate feasibility of the following management options for dredged sediment? If yes, check the appropriate option. Beach Nourishment ___ Unconfined Ocean Disposal ___ Confined Disposal: Confined Aquatic Disposal (CAD) ___ Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) ___ Landfill Reuse in accordance with COMM-97-001 ___ Shoreline Placement ___ Upland Material Reuse____ In-State landfill disposal____ - 13 - Out-of-state landfill disposal ____ (NOTE: This information is required for a 401 Water Quality Certification.) IV. Consistency: A. Does the project have effects on the coastal resources or uses, and/or is the project located within the Coastal Zone? X Yes ___ No; if yes, describe these effects and the projects consistency with the policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management: The proposed Project is located with the Coastal Zone. The Project is designed to remove an existing severely damaged, deteriorating, and currently closed pile-supported, recreational pier and replace it with an improved, ADA-compliant, safe, and functional recreational fishing pier. Significant elements of the project are specifically designed to directly reduce or eliminate existing public safety, environmental, and coastal hazards. Since the existing pier is unsafe and closed, its inherent public benefit is drastically diminished, while simultaneously presenting additional hazards and risk. The Project is designed to deliver a significantly improved coastal recreation resource for the public benefit with considerations made for sea level rise and overall resiliency. The Project is designed to reduce existing and anticipated adverse environmental impacts and reduce the frequency, scope, and cost of maintenance during the structure’s anticipated life cycle. B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? ___ Yes X No; if yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan: - 14 - WATER SUPPLY SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR 11.03(4))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe, in gallons per day (gpd), the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Municipal or regional water supply ________ ________ ________ Withdrawal from groundwater ________ ________ ________ Withdrawal from surface water ________ ________ ________ Interbasin transfer ________ ________ ________ (NOTE: Interbasin Transfer approval will be required if the basin and community where the proposed water supply source is located is different from the basin and community where the wastewater from the source will be discharged.) B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? ___ Yes ___ No C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source, has a pumping test been conducted? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach a map of the drilling sites and a summary of the alternatives considered and the results. ______________ D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons per day)? Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal? ___Yes ___No; if yes, then how much of an increase (gpd)? ____________________ E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility, water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? ___ Yes ___No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Flow Daily Flow Capacity of water supply well(s) (gpd) _______ ________ ________ ________ Capacity of water treatment plant (gpd) _______ ________ ________ ________ F. If the project involves a new interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed? G. Does the project involve: 1. new water service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority or other agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or water district? ___ Yes ___ No 2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, how many acres of alteration? 3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinking - 15 - water supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? ___ Yes ___ No III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans to enhance water resources, quality, facilities and services: - 16 - WASTEWATER SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater (see 301 CMR 11.03(5))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation -- Traffic Generation Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wastewater Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe the volume (in gallons per day) and type of disposal of wastewater generation for existing and proposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00 for septic systems or 314 CMR 7.00 for sewer systems): Existing Change Total Discharge of sanitary wastewater ________ ________ ________ Discharge of industrial wastewater ________ ________ ________ TOTAL ________ ________ ________ Existing Change Total Discharge to groundwater ________ ________ ________ Discharge to outstanding resource water ________ ________ ________ Discharge to surface water ________ ________ ________ Discharge to municipal or regional wastewater facility ________ ________ ________ TOTAL ________ ________ ________ B.Is the existing collection system at or near its capacity? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project’s wastewater flows: C. Is the existing wastewater disposal facility at or near its permitted capacity? ___ Yes___ No; if yes, then describe the measures to be undertaken to accommodate the project’s wastewater flows: D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or other wastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe as follows: Permitted Existing Avg Project Flow Total Daily Flow Wastewater treatment plant capacity (in gallons per day) _______ ________ ________ ________ E. If the project requires an interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is the direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or new? - 17 - (NOTE: Interbasin Transfer approval may be needed if the basin and community where wastewater will be discharged is different from the basin and community where the source of water supply is located.) F. Does the project involve new sewer service by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) or other Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipality or sewer district? ___ Yes ___ No G. Is there an existing facility, or is a new facility proposed at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, wastewater reuse (gray water) or other sewage residual materials? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the capacity (tons per day): Existing Change Total Storage ________ ________ ________ Treatment ________ ________ ________ Processing ________ ________ ________ Combustion ________ ________ ________ Disposal ________ ________ ________ H. Describe the water conservation measures to be undertaken by the project, and other wastewater mitigation, such as infiltration and inflow removal. III. Consistency A. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with applicable state, regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management: B. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive wastewater management plan? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, indicate the EEA number for the plan and whether the project site is within a sewer service area recommended or approved in that plan: - 18 - TRANSPORTATION SECTION (TRAFFIC GENERATION) I. Thresholds / Permit A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and Other Transportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below. II. Traffic Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site: Existing Change Total Number of parking spaces _______ ________ _______ Number of vehicle trips per day ________ ________ ________ ITE Land Use Code(s): ________ ________ ________ B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site? Roadway Existing Change Total 1. ___________________ ________ ________ ________ 2. ____________________ ________ ________ ________ 3. ____________________ ________ ________ ________ C. If applicable, describe proposed mitigation measures on state-controlled roadways that the project proponent will implement: D. How will the project implement and/or promote the use of transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and services to provide access to and from the project site? C. Is there a Transportation Management Association (TMA) that provides transportation demand management (TDM) services in the area of the project site? ____ Yes ____ No; if yes, describe if and how will the project will participate in the TMA: D. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation facilities? ____ Yes ____ No; if yes, generally describe: E. If the project will penetrate approach airspace of a nearby airport, has the proponent filed a Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Airspace Review Form (780 CMR 111.7) and a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (CFR Title 14 Part 77.13, forms 7460-1 and 7460-2)? III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional, state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services: - 19 - TRANSPORTATION SECTION (ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES) I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportation facilities? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section below. II. Transportation Facility Impacts A. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site: B. Will the project involve any 1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? ____________ 2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? ____________ 3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? ____________ III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services, including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan: - 20 - ENERGY SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR 11.03(7))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site: Existing Change Total Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) ________ ________ ________ Length of fuel line (in miles) ________ ________ ________ Length of transmission lines (in miles) ________ ________ ________ Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) ________ ________ ________ B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are: 1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)? 2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)? C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new, unused, or abandoned right of way? ___Yes ___No; if yes, please describe: D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services: III. Consistency Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plans and policies for enhancing energy facilities and services: 21 AIR QUALITY SECTION I. Thresholds A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR 11.03(8))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Air Quality Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix A)? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons per day) of: Existing Change Total Particulate matter ________ ________ ________ Carbon monoxide ________ ________ ________ Sulfur dioxide ________ ________ ________ Volatile organic compounds ________ ________ ________ Oxides of nitrogen ________ ________ ________ Lead ________ ________ ________ Any hazardous air pollutant ________ ________ ________ Carbon dioxide ________ ________ ________ B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts: III. Consistency A. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan: B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to air resources and air quality: 22 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION I. Thresholds / Permits A. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see 301 CMR 11.03(9))? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? ___ Yes X No; if yes, specify which permit: C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below. II. Impacts and Permits A. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing, combustion or disposal of solid waste? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage ________ ________ ________ Treatment, processing ________ ________ ________ Combustion ________ ________ ________ Disposal ________ ________ ________ B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons per day) of the capacity: Existing Change Total Storage ________ ________ ________ Recycling ________ ________ ________ Treatment ________ ________ ________ Disposal ________ ________ ________ C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal: D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos? ___ Yes ___ No E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts): III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid Waste Master Plan: 23 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION I. Thresholds / Impacts A. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? ___ Yes X No; if yes, attach correspondence. For project sites involving lands under water, have you consulted with the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources? ____Yes X No; if yes, attach correspondence B. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in either case listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? X Yes ___ No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition of all or any exterior part of such historic structure? X Yes ___ No; if yes, please describe: The Project involves the full demolition, removal, and replacement of the existing public pier at Salem Willows Park (MHC# SAL.965 Willow Pier), located in the Salem Willows Historic District (MHC# SAL.HA). C. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ___ Yes X No; if yes, does the project involve the destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? ___ Yes X No; if yes, please describe: D. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A, B and C, proceed to the Attachments and Certifications Sections. If you answered "Yes" to any part of either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below. II. Impacts Describe and assess the project's impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried historical and archaeological resources: The Project involves the full demolition, removal, and replacement of the existing public pier at Salem Willows Park (MHC# SAL.965 Willow Pier), located in the Salem Willows Historic District (MHC# SAL.HA). The current structure is closed to the public and will continue to deteriorate and present public safety, coastal, and environmental hazards without intervention, restoration of the existing structure is not considered a feasible alternative. III. Consistency Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state, regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources: The proponent will take following measures: 1.) Notify the applicable regulatory agencies concerned with the preservation, use, and development of the site. Opportunity for public review and comment will be provided. 2.) The Project will be designed and carried out in accordance with federal, state, regional, and local law and applicable standards and regulations. 3.) Understanding that the Project includes an explicit intent to demolish, remove and replace an inventoried structure within an inventoried district, all reasonable and practical effort will be made to protect and preserve surrounding historical and archeological resources, as required. 4.) The planning and physical aspects of the Project will be designed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate potential impacts to Massachusetts’ irreplaceable cultural resources. 5.) The proposed construction contracts will require that if the Contractor, during the performance of the work, uncovers or otherwise encounters any artifacts, whether historic or prehistoric, the Contractor shall bring them to the immediate attention of MDMF and the City of Salem, and stop all work in that vicinity of said artifacts until directed by the Owner. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | i TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER LETTER ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM 1.0 PROJECT NARRATIVE ..........................................................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................1 B. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................1 C. HISTORIC AUTHORIZATIONS.............................................................................................................1 D. EXISTING CONDITIONS .....................................................................................................................2 E. PROPOSED WORK .............................................................................................................................3 F. RESOURCE AREAS .............................................................................................................................5 Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (310 CMR 10.04) ...............................................................5 Land Under the Ocean (310 CMR 10.25) ..........................................................................................6 Coastal Beach (310 CMR 10.27) .......................................................................................................8 Coastal Bank (310 CMR 10.30) ...................................................................................................... 10 Rocky Intertidal Shores (310 CMR 10.31) ...................................................................................... 11 Land Containing Shellfish (310 CMR 10.34) .................................................................................. 12 100-Foot Buffer Zone .................................................................................................................... 14 Other Regulated Resource Areas .................................................................................................. 15 G. CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES ...................................................................................................... 15 H. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE RESOURCE AREA IMPACTS ................................................................... 16 I. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 16 “Do Nothing” ................................................................................................................................. 16 In-Kind Reconstruction .................................................................................................................. 16 Pier Replacement (Chosen Alternative) ........................................................................................ 17 J. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POPULATIONS .................................................................................... 18 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1 LOCUS PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 HISTORIC AUTHORIZATIONS ATTACHMENT 3 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG ATTACHMENT 4 PERMIT DRAWINGS ATTACHMENT 5 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TABLE ATTACHMENT 6 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POPULATIONS MAP ATTACHMENT 7 DISTRIBUTION LIST July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | ii July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 1 1.0 PROJECT NARRATIVE A.INTRODUCTION GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA), was retained by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game, Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF, Proponent) to provide engineering, permitting, and construction services for the construction of an accessible, recreational fishing pier in the location of the existing fishing pier in Salem Willows Park, 200 Fort Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts (Project). The Project includes the construction of a pile-supported or bottom-anchored structure of 2,000 or more square feet of base area occupying flowed tidelands or other waterways and is therefore subject to MEPA review in accordance with 301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)(6). The following provides detailed descriptions of the current conditions, proposed project, resource areas, and potential impacts to those resources that may result from the Project. B.BACKGROUND The project site is located near the north tip of Salem Neck, on the property owned by the City of Salem (City), known as Salem Willows Park, 200 Fort Avenue, Salem, MA (Site). The existing pier structure extends approximately 345 feet to the east-northeast, from the shore and over open water of Beverly Harbor and Salem Sound. A pier of similar size, shape, orientation and general character has existed in the current pier location for more than 100 years, however the pier has likely been reconstructed and repaired extensively since the original construction. According to representatives of MDMF and the City, the current structure experienced significant damage during storm events in October 2012 (Hurricane Sandy) and February 2013 (winter storm Nemo). Due to the damaged conditions of the pier, it has been closed or partially open, with restricted access to the public since 2013. The pier has since continued to deteriorate and there have been frequent reports of floating timber debris around the pier. Given the potential risks for public safety and environmental damage associated with escalating deterioration of the pier and the corresponding lack of public benefit from a closed recreational facility, MDMF is proposing the removal and replacement of the existing pier structure. The new recreational fishing pier will be designed to improve accessibility, safety, functionality, aesthetic appeal, and resiliency, while minimizing adverse environmental impacts. A Project Locus Plan is included in Attachment 1. C.HISTORIC AUTHORIZATIONS GZA located License Plan No. 1733, entitled “Plan Showing the Proposed Wharf at the Willows on Salem, Neck,” by Charles A. Putnam, C.E., for the City of Salem, Massachusetts; approved by the Massachusetts Harbor and Land Commissioners; and recorded by the Essex County Registry of Deeds on December 12, 1894. GZA also reviewed lists of prior authorizations on record with and provided by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Waterways Program (MassDEP Chapter 91) for projects in the City of Salem to attempt to locate additional prior authorizations for the existing structures at the site. Additional prior authorizations for the public pier at Salem Willows Park have not been located. Copies of the Massachusetts Harbor and Land Commissioners License No. 1733 documents recorded at the Essex County Registry of Deeds are included in Attachment 2. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 2 D.EXISTING CONDITIONS On April 21, 2021, GZA personnel visited the site and performed limited land-based topographic survey, inspection, hand-measurement, and photographic documentation of the existing pier structure, shoreline, and site features. The topographic survey included the locations existing site features such as the existing benches, retaining walls, seawalls, stone slope revetment, visible utilities, building corners, pavement, and landscaping. The results of GZA’s limited land-based topographic survey and inspection were used to supplement prior topographic and hydrographic surveys performed by CLE Engineering, Inc. (CLE) on 11/8/2016 and 12/1/2016, respectively. Documentation of test borings (B-1 to B-5) performed at the project site by CLE between 4/27/2017 and 7/19/2017 indicates that bedrock was encountered at depths between approximately 5 and 22 feet below existing grade, although bedrock outcroppings are also exposed at grade in the vicinity of the pier. Direct measurement and inspection of the existing pier structure during GZA’s site visit on 4/21/2021 were limited due access restrictions, however MDMF provided GZA with electronic copies of a prior drawing by Hobbs Endeavor Corporation (Hobbs), entitled “Maintenance Repair of Salem Willows Park Pier,” dated May 2008; and a prior pier damage report prepared by Kleinfelder, dated March 11, 2013. The CLE survey, Hobbs repair drawing, and Klienfelder damage report appeared generally consistent with GZA’s measurement and observations, although some variation in actual conditions is expected given the ongoing nature of the structure’s deterioration and accessibility limitations. The existing timber pier structure is approximately 345 feet long and extends into the waters of Beverly Harbor/Salem Sound in an east-northeast direction from the northern tip of Salem Neck. The landward entrance to the pier is accessible at grade from a paved (bituminous) area in the northeast of Salem Willows Park. The park includes maintained lawn, benches, picnic tables, restroom facilities, and gazebos. The Salem Willows Yacht Club, including a wood-framed pile-supported building, decks, and floating docks is located on the shore, approximately 300 feet west of the landward connection of the existing public pier. Networks of paved and unpaved paths connect different areas of the park, but vehicular access within the park is limited. An existing concrete seawall is located immediately below and to the south of the existing pier entrance. Frequent bedrock outcrops and stone armoring (rip rap) are exposed immediately seaward of the pier entrance and concrete seawall. Existing stone riprap, which appears to be constructed of individual stones ranging in weight up to several tons each, is present below the existing pier deck and visible above existing grade from shore to approximately 85 feet seaward, measured along the existing pier. The existing stone riprap ranges in height from existing grade to about elevation 8.5 feet (NAVD88) or in contact with the deck of the existing pier. Tidal areas immediately around the pier are predominantly rocky and a sandy pocket beach is located along the shore further to the south, between seaward extensions of Fort and Sutton Avenues. The deck of the existing pier is constructed of timber planks and is typically about 22 feet wide, except for an approximately 30-foot-long by 8-foot-wide section, located between about 65 to 95 feet from shore. The existing pier deck is roughly level and ranges in height from approximately elevation 9 to 10 feet (NAVD88). The existing pier is constructed with heavy timber framing and supported on approximately 164 timber piles and posts with bent spacings ranging from approximately 8 to 20 feet and about 2 to 11 piles per bent. The existing timber supports within the limits of the stone riprap described above appeared to be partially or fully embedded in the riprap. Visible bents with more than 2 piles typically include batter piles sloping from outer edge of the pier toward the center. Timber cross-bracing members are common but not consistently found connecting piles throughout. Approximately 12 additional timber piles associated with floating docks and gangways, fenders, and mooring facilities are located around the pier, but are not structurally connected to the main pier. A railing system, July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 3 constructed of timber and wire mesh surrounds the outer edges of the pier, however much of the existing railing appears to be damaged or missing. Representative existing conditions photographs are included in Attachment 3. E.PROPOSED WORK The proposed work (Project) includes the construction of a pile-supported or bottom-anchored structure of 2,000 or more square feet of base area occupying flowed tidelands or other waterways and is therefore subject to MEPA review (301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)(6)). The Project will occur in two general phases: Phase 1 – Demolition and Phase 2 - Construction. Phase 1 – Demolition involves the demolition, complete removal (or removal to the extent practical), and legal disposal of all remaining structural elements of the existing pier, including without limitation, all existing piles, posts, framing members (pile caps, stringers, bracing, blocking, etc.), railing, decking, curb and corresponding fasteners, connectors, or other associated elements. Phase 1 will include demolition and removal of approximately 176 existing timber piles or posts, and roughly 7,416 square feet of existing pier superstructure in total. Phase 1 will be scheduled to occur during the late fall, winter, and early spring seasons. Phase 1 is expected to require limited manipulation of the existing stone rip rap to recover the structural elements scheduled for demolition and removal. Upon completion of Phase 1, areas of disturbance will be restored or temporarily stabilized, secured, and maintained until the start of Phase 2 – Construction. Phase 2 – Construction will follow the successful completion of Phase 1. The proposed pier will be constructed in roughly the same footprint and alignment and will extend about the same horizontal distance from shore as the existing pier structure. The proposed work also includes the replacement of the existing gangway hoist (“gallows”) frame located off the north side of the pier. The existing float and gangway are seasonally installed and removed, but the hoist frame is a permanent structure that is necessary to facilitate manual raising and lowering of the gangway, when installed. The proposed pier will be elevated approximately three feet higher than the existing pier, with a proposed deck elevation of approximately 13.0 feet (NAVD88). The increased deck elevation of the proposed pier and other proposed structural improvements are designed to reduce the frequency, force, and damage of predicted wave impacts. Phase 2 includes the installation of 76 new piles, total. Approximately 72 plumb piles will be installed to support the proposed pier and 4 piles (2 plumb and 2 batter) will be installed to support the gangway hoist frame off the north side of the pier. The proposed piles will be 16-inch diameter, 5/8-inch wall thickness, steel pipe piles. The exterior of the proposed piles will be coated with a coal-tar epoxy or similar system, designed for the marine environment, to protect against corrosion. The proposed steel pipe piles will typically be advanced through existing overburden soils and then drilled into the underlying bedrock and then grouted over its embedded length (rock-socketed). The remaining balance of volume inside the piles will be filled with additional grout or concrete. Limited removal and resetting of existing stone fill or other obstructions may be necessary to achieve the required pile embedment. Construction of the pier superstructure will follow or potentially overlap pile installation. The proposed pier superstructure will consist of three significant elements: a land-side access ramp and stair system, a main pier, and a terminal T-pier. A timber or concrete access ramp and stair system will be constructed July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 4 within an existing paved area at the landward end of the pier to provide ADA-compliant access to the new elevated pier deck while maintaining existing surrounding grades and surface materials. The proposed access ramp will be about 6 feet wide, not more than 30 feet long, and terminate in a level concrete landing pad at its landward end. A roughly 6-foot-wide access stair will be located beside the ramp to provide alternative access from existing grade to the elevated main pier deck. The transition from the access ramp and stair system to the elevated main pier deck will occur in about the same location as the entrance to the existing pier, however the existing concrete wall/pier abutment will be modified or removed and replaced, as necessary, with reinforced concrete to support the proposed structure and incorporated into the existing, adjacent wall(s) to remain. The proposed main pier will extend seaward from the proposed access ramp and stair system. The main pier will be approximately 330 feet long and 12 feet wide. The main pier will be supported by 27 pile bents (Bent Nos. 1 to 27), typically spaced 12 feet on center, with 2 plumb piles per bent. The proposed terminal T-pier will be approximately 60 feet long and 16 feet wide, centered about its length and perpendicular to the alignment of the main pier. The T-pier will be supported by 6 pile bents (Bent Nos. 28 to 33), spaced about 12 feet on center, with 3 plumb piles per bent. Additionally, coated steel cross-bracing members will be installed to connect the piles in each T-pier bent. The combined surface area of the proposed pile-supported pier is approximately 4,920 square feet. The proposed pier superstructure will be constructed primarily of treated southern yellow pine timber products, fastened with hot-dipped galvanized steel and stainless-steel connections. In general, the timber members above and including the decking will be ACQ-treated. CCA-treated timber members will be used below the decking, or where the potential for direct contact with visitors will be minimal. The proposed pier deck will be constructed of 3 x 8 timber planks. The proposed deck will be carried 10 x 12 and 6 x 12 timber stringers, connected to 12 x 16 timber pile caps. A railing system will be installed continuously around the perimeter of the pier deck. The proposed railing system will be constructed of 6 x 8 ACQ-treated timber posts, typically spaced 6 feet on center. A galvanized steel pipe top rail and galvanized steel railing insert will be installed between railing posts. Modified railing inserts and decking extensions will be provided at regular intervals to accommodate wheelchair access. Additionally, railing sections will be modified to accommodate the seasonally installed gangway connection and safety ladder locations. Phases 1 and 2 are expected to require both typical land-based and water-based construction equipment. Land- based construction access and staging will include the existing paved area, immediately landward of the existing pier. Water-based construction may be supported by work boats, tugs, floating barges, skiffs, or other similar means. Combinations of land-based and water-based pile installation equipment may be employed at the Contractor’s discretion, subject to the limitations of applicable permits, restrictions, and regulations. Land-based heavy equipment access to the proposed construction areas seaward of the existing concrete seawall will be minimized. Access for the demolition of the existing pier and installation the new pier superstructure will be supported by water-based equipment or by travelling on temporary falsework, trestles, or the new pier structure itself. The existing stone rip rap will be maintained and restored as near to its pre-construction condition during both phases of the work. Significant alterations, demolition, or removal of the existing concrete seawalls, granite walls, stone slopes, and existing grade beyond the proposed structures are not anticipated. Disturbance of existing pavement, landscaping and other land-side surfaces will be minimized to the extent feasible, temporarily stabilized during the remaining work, and restored in-kind to pre-construction or proposed improved conditions prior to completion of Phase 2. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 5 The Project includes the construction of a pile-supported or bottom-anchored structure of 2,000 or more square feet of base area occupying flowed tidelands or other waterways and is therefore subject to MEPA review (301 CMR 11.03 (3)(b)(6)). Areas of proposed work are indicated on the Permit Drawings in Attachment 4. F.RESOURCE AREAS The proposed work will be performed using the best available measures to minimize the adverse impacts to the resource areas defined under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA) and local wetlands ordinances. The project has been designed to limit both temporary and permanent impacts at the site. However, the proposed work will result in unavoidable temporary and permanent impacts. This section will list and define the resource areas impacted by this project and describe measures to avoid and minimize any potential adverse impacts. Table 1 summarizes the impacts proposed within each resource area. Table No. 1 – Summary of Resource Area Impacts Resource Area Impact Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage ±11,915 SF Total and entirely within areas of existing improvement (paved, landscaped, etc.) ±11,705 SF Temporary impact for construction access/staging (>98% of Total). ±210 SF Permanent alteration for pier access stair, ramp, and abutment (<2% of Total). Land Under the Ocean ±121 SF during Phase 1 – Demolition, corresponding to permanent removal of ±154 existing timber piles from Land Under the Ocean (temporary, removal of existing impacts). ±106 SF during Phase 2 - Construction, corresponding to installation of ±60 proposed steel pipe piles, including the additional annular areas for the rock-sockets, for the gangway hoist frame, main pier, and T-pier. Note: Approximately 15 SF net resource area impact reduction from existing to proposed. Coastal Beach ±17 SF during Phase 1 – Demolition, corresponding to permanent removal of ±22 existing timber piles from Coastal Beach (temporary, removal of existing impacts). ±28 SF during Phase 2 - Construction, corresponding to installation of ±16 proposed steel pipe piles, including the additional annular areas for the rock-sockets, for the main pier. Coastal Bank ±24 LF during Phase 1 and 2, corresponding to limited demolition and removal of the existing pier and modification or limited replacement of the existing concrete seawall/abutment. Rocky Intertidal Shores This impact is the same as the Coastal Beach impact. It is assumed that the Coastal Beach impacts identified above overlap completely with the Rocky Intertidal Shore resource area based on field observations of the site conditions. Land Containing Shellfish ±25 SF during Phase 1 – Demolition, corresponding to permanent removal of ±32 existing timber piles from Land Containing Shellfish (temporary, removal of existing impacts). ±35 SF during Phase 2 - Construction, corresponding to installation of ±16 proposed steel pipe piles, including the additional annular areas for the rock-sockets, for the main pier. Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (310 CMR 10.04) Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage is defined as, “land subject to any inundation caused by coastal storms up to and include that caused by the 100-year storm, surge of record or storm of record, whichever is greater.” July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 6 At the Site, the Mean High Water (MLW) level is at approximately 4.2 feet NAVD88 and the FEMA Base Flood Elevation is at elevation 16 feet NAVD88. Approximately 11,915 square feet of Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage (LSCSF) will be impacted by the Proposed Project. The entire LSCSF impact area is within existing paved or landscaped areas of Salem Willows Park. Approximately 11,705 square feet (>98%) of the total LSCSF impact area will be temporary in nature and corresponds to areas of potential disturbance during construction from the Contractor’s land-based access and staging operations. Approximately 210 square feet (<2%) of the total LSCSF impact area will be permanently altered due to the proposed work and includes the proposed timber access stair and ramp system and part of the elevated pier deck. Unimproved areas will be restored to pre-construction conditions prior to completion of the Project. The proposed work will not significantly alter the existing grade, nor will it adversely impact the land’s ability to buffer storm waves. There are no additional performance standards for the LSCSF resource area provided under the Massachusetts WPA Regulations. Land Under the Ocean (310 CMR 10.25) Land Under the Ocean is defined as “the land extending from the mean low water line seaward to the boundary of the municipality’s jurisdiction and includes land under estuaries.” The proposed work within the Land Under Ocean (LUO) resource area includes the demolition and removal of approximately 154 existing timber piles and the installation of approximately 60 proposed 16-inch diameter, rock- socketed, concrete-filled steel pipe piles. The impact of the existing piles within the LUO is approximately 121 square feet. The impact of the proposed steel pipe piles within the LUO, including the additional annular area for the rock sockets, is approximately 106 square feet and corresponds to an approximately 15-square-foot reduction of LUO impact area. Table 2 lists the performance standards for Land Under the Ocean and describes how the proposed project will address the performance standards. Table No. 2 – Performance Standards for Work Land Under the Ocean Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.25(3) Improvement dredging for navigational purposes affecting land under the ocean shall bedesigned and carried out using the best available measures so as to minimize adverse effects on such interests caused by changes in: (a) bottom topography which will result in increased flooding or erosion caused by an increase in the height or velocity of waves impacting the shore; (b) sediment transport processes which will increase flood or erosion hazards by affecting the natural replenishment of beaches; (c) water circulation which will result in an adverse change in flushing rate, temperature, or turbidity levels; or (d) marine productivity which will result from the suspension or transport of pollutants, the smothering of bottom organisms, the accumulation of pollutants by organisms, or the destruction of marine fisheries habitat or wildlife habitat. The proposed project does not include improvement dredging for navigational purposes. Nevertheless, the project will be designed and carried out using the best available measures to minimize adverse effects on bottom topography, sediment transport, water circulation, marine productivity, or other adverse effects on wetland resource areas. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 7 Table No. 2 – Performance Standards for Work Land Under the Ocean Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.25(4) Maintenance dredging for navigational purposes affecting land under the ocean shall be designed and carried out using the best available measures so as to minimize adverse effects on such interests caused by changes in marine productivity which will result from the suspension or transport of pollutants, increases in turbidity, the smothering of bottom organisms, the accumulation of pollutants by organisms, or the destruction of marine fisheries habitat or wildlife habitat. The proposed project does not include maintenance dredging for navigational purposes. Nevertheless, the project will be designed and carried out using the best available measures to minimize adverse effects on bottom topography, sediment transport, water circulation, marine productivity, or other adverse effects on wetland resource areas. 310 CMR 10.25(5) Projects not included in 310 CMR 10.25(3) or (4) which affect nearshore areas of land under the ocean shall not cause adverse effects by altering the bottom topography so as to increase storm damage or erosion of coastal beaches, coastal banks, coastal dunes, or salt marshes. The proposed project shall not cause adverse effects by altering the bottom topography so as to increase storm damage or erosion of coastal beaches, coastal banks, coastal dunes, or salt marshes. 310 CMR 10.25(6) Projects not included in 310 CMR 10.25(3) which affect land under the ocean shall if water-dependent be designed and constructed, using best available measures, so as to minimize adverse effects, and if non-water-dependent, have no adverse effects, on marine fisheries habitat or wildlife habitat caused by: (a) alterations in water circulation; (b) destruction of eelgrass (Zostera marina) or widgeon grass (Rupia maritina) beds; (c) alterations in the distribution of sediment grain size; (d) changes in water quality, including, but not limited to, other than natural fluctuations in the level of dissolved oxygen, temperature or turbidity, or the addition of pollutants; or (e) alterations of shallow submerged lands with high densities of polychaetes, mollusks or macrophytic algae. The proposed project is water-dependent and involves the demolition, removal of an existing pile supported recreational pier and the construction of an improved pile supported recreational pier in the existing structure’s location. The project will be designed and constructed using best available measures to minimize potential adverse environmental effects and reduce environmental impacts associated with the existing structure. No eelgrass or widgeon grass beds have been observed at the site. Improvements include but are not limited reduced deck surface area, increased deck height, reduced number of piles, and reduced pile impact area. An existing seasonally installed float and gangway will remain in the same approximate location. 310 CMR 10.25(7) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.25(3) through (6), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. No Estimated Habitat for Rare Species or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife are listed in the vicinity of the proposed project site on the current maps published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 8 Coastal Beach (310 CMR 10.27) Massachusetts WPA Regulations define Coastal Beach as, “unconsolidated sediment subject to wave, tidal and coastal storm action which forms the gently sloping shore of a body of saltwater and includes tidal flats. Coastal beaches extend from the mean low water line landward to the dune line, coastal bank line or the seaward edge of existing human-made structures, when these structures replace one of the above lines, whichever is closest to the ocean.” The Coastal Beach resource area extends from the Mean Low Water (MLW) line to the seaward edge of the existing man-made structures (e.g. concrete seawalls and stone revetments). The Coastal Beach resource area located on the project site is predominantly characterized by the significant presence of bedrock outcroppings and boulders exposed at existing grade and is also consistent with the definition of Rocky Intertidal Shores, described further below. For the purposes of this application, the proposed work occurring in Coastal Beach can be considered identical to the work occurring in Rocky Intertidal Shores and the resource area impacts have been evaluated accordingly. Additionally, apparent human-made stone riprap, roughly 80 feet long by 30 to 40 feet wide (approximately 3,000 SF) underlies the existing and proposed pier deck in this resource area and ranges in height above the Mean High Water (MHW) line up to approximately elevation 8.5 feet (NAVD88) in this resource area. This evaluation assumes the proposed work to occur within the limits of this riprap will be within the Coastal Beach, Rocky Intertidal Shores and other overlapping resource areas to better align with the spirit and intent of the Wetland Protection Regulations. Regardless of their resource area classification, disturbance of existing boulders, stones, sediment, or other naturally occurring materials will be avoided to the extent feasible and minimized to the extent necessary to perform the proposed work. Existing boulders, stones, sediment, or other naturally occurring materials displaced during Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be reset and remain as near to their pre- construction location and condition as feasible. The proposed work within the Coastal Beach resource area includes the demolition and removal of approximately 22 existing timber piles and the installation of approximately 16 proposed 16-inch diameter, rock-socketed, concrete-filled steel pipe piles. The impact of the existing piles to be demolished and removed from within the Coastal Beach is approximately 17 square feet. The impact of the proposed steel pipe piles within the Coastal Beach, including the additional annular area for the rock sockets, is approximately 28 square feet and corresponds to an approximately 11-square-foot net increase in Coastal Beach impact area. However, it is also noted that only 2 of the 16 proposed piles located in the assumed Coastal Beach resource area (corresponding to approximately 4 square feet of impact) will be installed outside the observed (above existing grade) limits of the riprap described above. Upon completion of each Phase and except for the proposed project improvements, the site will be restored to pre-construction conditions. In accordance with 310 CMR 10.27, when a coastal beach is determined to be significant to storm damage prevention, flood control, or protection of wildlife habitat, 310 CMR 10.27(3) through (7) shall apply. When a tidal flat is determined to be significant to marine fisheries or the protection of wildlife habitat, 310 CMR 10.27(6) shall apply. Table 3 lists the performance standards for Coastal Beach and describes how the proposed project will address the performance standards. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 9 Table No. 3 – Performance Standards for Work in Coastal Beach Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.27(3) Any project on a coastal beach, except any project permitted under 310 CMR 10.30(3)(a), shall not have an adverse effect by increasing erosion, decreasing the volume or changing the form of any such coastal beach or an adjacent or downdrift coastal beach. The proposed work that will occur within Coastal Beach, will be designed, and constructed to avoid adverse effects. The proposed work involves the removal and construction of a pile supported structure. Increasing erosion or decreasing the volume or changes to existing landform are not considered reasonably likely to occur as a result of the proposed work. 310 CMR 10.27(4) Any groin, jetty, solid pier, or other such solid fill structure which will interfere with littoral drift, in addition to complying with 310 CMR 10.27(3), shall be constructed as follows: (a) It shall be the minimum length and height demonstrated to be necessary to maintain beach form and volume. In evaluating necessity, coastal engineering, physical oceanographic and/or coastal geologic information shall be considered. (b) Immediately after construction any groin shall be filled to entrapment capacity in height and length with sediment of grain size compatible with that of the adjacent beach. (c) Jetties trapping littoral drift material shall contain a sand by-pass system to transfer sediments to the downdrift side of the inlet or shall be periodically redredged to provide beach nourishment to ensure that downdrift or adjacent beaches are not starved of sediments. There are no new groins, solid piers, or other structures proposed as part of the project. 310 CMR 10.27(5) Notwithstanding 310 CMR 10.27(3), beach nourishment with clean sediment of a grain size compatible with that on the existing beach may be permitted. No beach nourishment is proposed. 310 CMR 10.27(6) In addition to complying with the requirements of 310 CMR 10.27(3) and (4), a project on a tidal flat shall if water- dependent be designed and constructed, using best available measures, so as to minimize adverse effects, and if non-water-dependent, have no adverse effects, on marine fisheries and wildlife habitat caused by: (a) alterations in water circulation; (b) alterations in the distribution of sediment grain size; and (c) changes in water quality, including, but not limited to, other than natural fluctuations in the levels of dissolved oxygen, temperature or turbidity, or the addition of pollutants. No work is proposed on a tidal flat. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 10 Table No. 3 – Performance Standards for Work in Coastal Beach Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.27(7) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.27(3) through (6), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites or rare vertebrate or invertebrate species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. No Estimated Habitat for Rare Species or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife are listed in the vicinity of the proposed project sites on the current maps published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Coastal Bank (310 CMR 10.30) Massachusetts WPA Regulations define Coastal Bank as, “the seaward face or side of any elevated landform, other than coastal dune, which lies at the landward edge of a coastal beach, land subject to tidal action or other wetland.” The Coastal Bank at the project sites include existing man-made foreshore protection structures including concrete seawalls and stone revetment. The Coastal Bank at the project site is not a source of sediment to the Coastal Beach, but it does provide a vertical buffer to storm waves and surge. The Coastal Bank contributes to the protection of the upland areas of existing, recreational, public open space (Salem Willows Park), paved and unpaved roadways, walkways, utilities and other public and private property from wave and flood-related damage. The proposed work includes approximately 24 lineal feet of temporary and permanent, albeit minor, alteration of the Coastal Bank. The Phase 1 work that will impact the Coastal Bank includes the demolition and removal of the existing pier structure that is in contact with the existing concrete seawall. The Phase 2 work that will impact the Coastal Bank includes the minor modification or limited removal and replacement of the existing concrete seawall to support the proposed height increase of the new pier. The alignment and location of the seaward face of proposed seawall will match the existing and any alterations will be incorporated into the existing seawall(s) to remain. The proposed work will not adversely impact the ability of the existing Coastal Bank at the project site to be vertical buffers to storm waves and surge. In accordance with 310 CMR 10.30, when a Coastal Bank is determined to be significant to storm damage prevention or flood control because it is a vertical buffer to storm waters, 310 CMR 10.30(6) through (8) shall apply. Table 4 lists the performance standards for Coastal Bank and describes how the proposed project will address the performance standards. Table No. 4 – Performance Standards for Work in Coastal Bank Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.30(6) Any project on such a coastal bank or within 100 feet landward of the top of such coastal bank shall have no adverse effects on the stability of the coastal bank. The proposed work is designed and will be constructed to have no adverse effect on the coastal bank. The proposed project will provide a more resilient shoreline able to buffer storm waves and surge to protect the landward recreational areas, roadways, walkways, utilities, and other public and private property. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 11 Table No. 4 – Performance Standards for Work in Coastal Bank Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.30(7) Bulkheads, revetment, seawalls, groins or other coastal engineering structures may be permitted on such a coastal bank except when such a bank is significant to storm damage prevention or flood control because it supplies sediment to coastal beaches, coastal dunes, and barrier beaches. The Coastal Bank at the project site include existing man- made foreshore protection structures including concrete seawalls and stone revetments. The previously disturbed, armored Coastal Bank is not a sediment source to the Coastal Beach, but rather significant to storm damage prevention and flood control as a vertical buffer to storm waves. The proposed work includes minor modification and/or the minor removal and in-kind replacement of an existing concrete seawall, within its existing footprint and will not extend further seaward. 310 CMR 10.30(8) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.30(3) through (7), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. No Estimated Habitat for Rare Species or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife are listed in the vicinity of the proposed project sites on the current maps published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Rocky Intertidal Shores (310 CMR 10.31) Massachusetts WPA Regulations define Rocky Intertidal Shores as, “naturally occurring rocky areas, such as bedrock or boulder-strewn areas between the mean high water line and the mean low water line.” The Rocky Intertidal Shores area occurring on the project site is predominantly characterized by the significant presence of bedrock outcroppings and boulders exposed at existing grade between MLW and MHW, and overlaps with the Coastal Beach resource area described above. For the purposes of this application, the proposed work occurring in Rocky Intertidal Shores can be considered identical to the work occurring in Coastal Beach and the resource area impacts have been evaluated accordingly. Additionally, apparent human-made stone riprap, roughly 80 feet long by 30 to 40 feet wide (approximately 3,000 SF) underlies the existing and proposed pier deck in this resource area and ranges in height above the Mean High Water (MHW) line up to approximately elevation 8.5 feet (NAVD88) in this resource area. This evaluation assumes the proposed work to occur within the limits of this stone riprap will be within the Coastal Beach, Rocky Intertidal Shores and other overlapping resource areas to better align with the spirit and intent of the Wetland Protection Regulations. Regardless of their resource area classification, disturbance of existing boulders, stones, sediment, or other naturally occurring materials will be avoided to the extent feasible and minimized to the extent necessary to perform the proposed work. Existing boulders, stones, sediment, or other naturally occurring materials displaced during Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be reset and remain as near to their pre-construction location and condition as feasible. The proposed work within the Rocky Intertidal Shores resource area includes the demolition and removal of approximately 22 existing timber piles and the installation of approximately 16 proposed 16-inch diameter, rock- socketed, concrete-filled steel pipe piles. The impact of the existing piles to be demolished and removed from within the Rocky Intertidal Shores is approximately 17 square feet. The impact of the proposed steel pipe piles within the Rocky Intertidal Shores, including the additional annular area for the rock sockets, is approximately 28 July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 12 square feet and corresponds to an approximately 11-square-foot net increase in Rocky Intertidal Shores impact area. However, it is also noted that only 2 of the 16 proposed piles located in the assumed Rocky Intertidal Shores resource area (corresponding to approximately 4 square feet of impact) will be installed outside the observed (above existing grade) limits of the stone riprap described above. Indirect shading impacts from the existing pier decking will be reduced by elevating the proposed deck approximately 3 feet higher and reducing the decking area from the approximately 1,892 square feet of existing decking overlying the Rocky Intertidal Shores to the approximately 1,210 square feet of deck proposed in this resource area. Upon completion of each Phase and except for the proposed project improvements, the site will be restored to pre-construction conditions. In accordance with 310 CMR 10.31, Table 5 lists the performance standards for Rocky Intertidal Shores and describes how the proposed project will address the performance standards. Table No. 5 – Performance Standards for Work in Rocky Intertidal Shores Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.31(3) When a rocky intertidal shore is determined to be significant to storm damage prevention, flood control, or protection of wildlife habitat, any proposed project shall be designed and constructed, using the best practical measures, so as to minimize adverse effects on the form and volume of exposed intertidal bedrock and boulders. The proposed project is designed and will be constructed using the best practical measures to minimize adverse effects on the form and volume of exposed intertidal bedrock and boulders. 310 CMR 10.31(4) When a rocky intertidal shore is determined to be significant to the protection of marine fisheries or wildlife habitat, any proposed project shall if water-dependent be designed and constructed, using best available measures, so as to minimize adverse effects, and if non-water-dependent, have no adverse effects, on water circulation and water quality. Water quality impacts include, but are not limited to, other than natural fluctuations in the levels of dissolved oxygen, temperature or turbidity, or the addition of pollutants. The proposed project is designed and will be constructed using the best practical measures to minimize adverse effects to marine fisheries or wildlife habitat. The project includes removal of existing treated timber piles, reduction in decking surface area, and a 3-foot relative deck height increase. The minimum number and size of piles practical will be used for the proposed pier construction. Sedimentation and erosion control measures will be in place during construction activities. 310 CMR 10.31(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.31(3) and (4), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat sites of rare vertebrate or invertebrate species, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. No Estimated Habitat for Rare Species or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife are listed in the vicinity of the proposed project sites on the current maps published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Land Containing Shellfish (310 CMR 10.34) Massachusetts WPA Regulations define Land Containing Shellfish as, “land under the ocean, tidal flats, rocky intertidal shores, salt marshes and land under salt ponds when any such land contains shellfish.” July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 13 According to the MassGIS Oliver online mapping tool, mapped shellfish suitability areas are located within the Project footprint. Approximately 2,334 square feet of mapped shellfish suitability area, corresponding to the European Oysters, Quahog, and Blue Mussel species underlies the footprint of the existing pier structure. Approximately 32 existing timber piles, corresponding to approximately 25 square feet of direct impact, are located in Land Containing Shellfish. The proposed Project includes the removal of the existing piles and decking associated with the existing pier and the installation of approximately 20 proposed 16-inch diameter, rock- socketed, concrete-filled steel pipe piles, corresponding to approximately 35 square feet of direct impact. The proposed project includes approximately 1,660 square feet of improved pier structure in the mapped shellfish suitability area. The proposed project includes approximately 210 square feet of new structures associated with a new ramp and stair system to access the proposed elevated pier deck. The proposed ramp and stair access system will be constructed entirely within existing paved areas or upon existing human-made structures (seawall), currently above the MHW line, therefore inclusion of this resource area impact under Land Containing Shellfish is considered conservative and dilutes the apparent overall reduction of adverse environmental impact that is associated with the proposed project. In addition to providing a relatively smaller overall footprint in the Land Containing Shellfish resource area, the deck of the proposed pier will be elevated approximately 3 feet above the existing deck, further reducing the adverse impacts associated with shading. In accordance with 310 CMR 10.34, when a resource area, including Land Under the Ocean, tidal flats, rocky intertidal shores, salt marshes, or land under salt ponds is determined to be significant to the protection of land containing shellfish and therefore to the protection of marine fisheries, 310 CMR 10.34(4) through (8) shall apply. Table 6 lists the performance standards for Land Containing Shellfish and describes how the proposed project will address the performance standards. Table No. 6 – Performance Standards for Work in Land Containing Shellfish Performance Standard Proposed Project 310 CMR 10.34(4) Except as provided in 310 CMR 10.34(5), any project on land containing shellfish shall not adversely affect such land or marine fisheries by a chance in the productivity of such land caused by: (a) alterations of water circulation; (b) alterations in relief elevation; (c) the compacting of sediment by vehicular traffic; (d) alterations in the distribution of sediment grain size; (e) alterations in natural drainage from adjacent land; or (f) changes in water quality, including, but not limited to, other than natural fluctuations in the levels of salinity, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, temperature or turbidity, or the addition of pollutants. Due to the constraints of the site, Land Containing shellfish cannot be avoided, however the project is designed and will be carried out using best available measures to minimize adverse effects on Land Containing Shellfish. The proposed project will be constructed within as near the existing structures footprint as feasible, to limit new impacts. Piles located within Land containing shellfish will be minimized to the extent feasible considering site characteristics and structural stability. Adverse effects to Land Containing Shellfish, caused by the mechanisms identified in 310 CMR 10.34(4), are not anticipated to result from the proposed Project. Vehicular traffic is not proposed on existing tidal areas. Erosion, sediment, and turbidity controls will be employed throughout the proposed work. 310 CMR 10.34(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.34(4), projects which temporarily have an adverse effect on shellfish productivity but which do not permanently destroy the habitat may be permitted if the land containing shellfish The proposed Project will not permanently destroy the Land Containing Shellfish Habitat. The impacted Land Containing Shellfish can and will be substantially returned to its natural productivity upon completion of the work, if shellfish productivity is indeed adversely impacted by the work. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 14 Table No. 6 – Performance Standards for Work in Land Containing Shellfish Performance Standard Proposed Project can and will be returned substantially to its former productivity in less than one year from the commencement of work, unless an extension of the Order of Conditions is granted, in which case such restoration shall be completed within on year of such extension. 310 CMR 10.34(6) In the case of land containing shellfish defined as significant in 310 CMR 10.34(3)(b), except in Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, the issuing authority may, after consultation with the Shellfish Constable, permit the shellfish to be moved from such area under guidelines of, and to a suitable location approved by, the Division of Marine Fisheries, in order to permit a proposed project on such land. Any such project shall not be commenced until after the moving and replanting of the shellfish have been commenced. The proposed project does not anticipate removal or relocation of shellfish. 310 CMR 10.34(7) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.34(4) through (6), projects approved by the Division of Marine Fisheries that are specifically intended to increase the productivity of land containing shellfish may be permitted. Aquaculture projects approved by the appropriate local and state authority may also be permitted. 310 CMR 10.34(7) is not applicable to the proposed project. 310 CMR 10.34(8) Notwithstanding the provisions of 310 CMR 10.34(4) through (7), no project may be permitted which will have any adverse effect on specified habitat of rare vertebrate or invertebrate specified, as identified by procedures established under 310 CMR 10.37. No Estimated Habitat for Rare Species or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife are listed in the vicinity of the proposed project sites on the current maps published by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. 100-Foot Buffer Zone Massachusetts WPA Regulations define the 100-Foot Buffer Zone as, “100-ft area horizontally (on a true lateral) landward of approved delineation of applicable wetland resource areas.” The WPA further states that any activities undertaken within 100 feet of an area specified in 310 CMR 10.02(1)(a) will be conducted per (310 CMR 10.02(2)(b)), “in a manner so as to reduce the potential for any adverse impacts to the resource area during construction, and with post-construction measures implemented to stabilize any disturbed areas.” The proposed Project will occur entirely within existing coastal wetland resource areas as described above and will not otherwise impact the 100-foot buffer zone. July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 15 Other Regulated Resource Areas GZA has also considered whether the Project Site falls within other environmental regulatory boundaries that would require additional permits. There are no Outstanding Resource Waters, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Certified Vernal Pools, Estimated Habitat for Rare Species, or Priority Habitat for Rare Wildlife associated with the Project Site. G.CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES The specific means and methods of construction will be the responsibility of the Contractor. The project team assumes that combinations of land-based and water-based access procedures will be used during the performance of both Phase 1 and Phase 2. The Site will be accessed over land by existing public roads and City- owned property. Land-based construction access and staging will occur in designated areas of Salem Willows Park, which will occur mostly in existing gravel and paved areas. Temporary disturbance of vegetated or lawn areas will be minimized. During periods of active construction land-based access areas will delineated and secured by the Contractor. Water-based equipment will be staged and stored as near to the work as practical, in accordance with applicable permit requirements, standards, and regulations. Additionally, the Contractor’s use of water-based equipment will be subject to coordination with the Harbormaster and other local, state, and federal authorities. Erosion and sedimentation control best management practices (BMPs) will be employed by the Contractor during construction activity. During Phase 1 – Demolition, the Contractor will mobilize land- and water-based equipment to the site as necessary to perform the work. The Contractor will demolish and remove the existing pier structure by dismantling manageable portions of the superstructure and pile bracing. The contractor will extract existing piles and posts, above and below grade, using techniques to minimize excavation. Work performed in- or over-water will be enclosed by floating debris boom and sediment curtains as required. The Contractor will immediately recover any demolition debris that falls into the water, tidal areas, or any other resource area. Depending on the Contractor’s means and methods, the Contractor may temporarily store demolition debris on floating equipment (i.e. barges) or in the land-based access and staging areas, in an acceptable manner to prevent loss of materials into the water or adjacent resource areas. All debris generated from the demolition will become the property of the Contractor and completely removed from the site at reasonable intervals, if not daily. Upon completion of Phase 1, areas of disturbance will be restored or temporarily stabilized and maintained as required until commencement of Phase 2 – Construction. The Contractor will de-mobilize remaining equipment and materials not scheduled for immediate use on site. Phase 2 – Construction will follow the successful completion of Phase 1 - Demolition. During Phase 2 – Construction, the Contractor will mobilize land- and water-based equipment to the site as necessary to perform the work. Work performed in- or over-water will be enclosed by floating debris boom and sediment curtains as required. New steel pipe pile supports will be installed in the proposed locations. Construction of the pier deck will follow and potentially overlap pile installation activities. A timber access ramp and stair system will be constructed at the landward end of the pier, within the existing paved area, to provide access to the new elevated pier deck while generally maintaining surrounding existing grades. The Contractor will be responsible for the restoration of all unimproved areas impacted by the work to pre- construction conditions prior to completion of the Project. Equipment, materials, debris, or other items will be July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 16 stored above high tide level when not being utilized. The project as presented will be constructed in a manner to minimize any adverse impacts to resource areas at the site. Refer to Permit Drawings in Attachment 4. H.MEASURES TO MINIMIZE RESOURCE AREA IMPACTS Measures to minimize impacts to the Resource Areas noted above include the following: Contractor will have a spill kit on each piece of equipment. Each vehicle shall be inspected daily for leaks; any leaking equipment shall be removed from the site immediately and shall not return to service until repaired. The contractor will provide a contingency plan for approval in the event a piece of equipment is stuck to remove the equipment immediately. The work area will be left in a condition such that rising water and/or adverse weather will not cause damage to the work area or adjacent areas. The contractor will perform the work during favorable tides for the various aspects of the work. The contractor will work the tides to minimize impacts to resource areas. Erosion and sediment control measures will be in place during construction activities. Proposed work shall comply with all Federal, State and Local Codes and Regulations. Proposed work shall comply with the Local Conservation Commission’s Order of Conditions. I.ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS An alternative analysis was developed for the proposed work as follows. A summary table of this alternatives analysis has been included in Attachment 5. “Do Nothing” The Do-Nothing alternative effectively means there is no project. The existing pier is currently closed to public access due to safety concerns and the condition of the pier will not improve without significant intervention. The pier’s exposure to coastal storms and flood events would likely accelerate and exacerbate structural damage and deterioration. Various undesirable environmental impacts may occur, such as treated (creosote, CCA, etc.) and untreated timber members being displaced into the harbor and/or other resource areas, if not accounted for in a controlled demolition. The existing structures may present an increased hazard to public health and safety, if allowed to continue deteriorating. In-Kind Reconstruction This alternative involved the reconstruction of the existing pier to the existing pier dimensions and deck elevation in its existing location. Given the extensive deterioration and loss of structural members, repair and preventative maintenance of the remaining structure is not considered practical. Additionally, in-kind reconstruction of the pier July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 17 does not mitigate the structure’s exposure to waves and other damaging extreme ocean weather events that are expected to intensify in the future. Pier Replacement (Chosen Alternative) Pier Replacement is the chosen alternative. Pier Replacement involves the full removal and replacement of the existing pier with an improved structure. The proposed deck height of the pier is elevation 13.0 feet (NAVD88) or roughly 3 feet higher than the existing structure. The proposed main pier is 12 feet wide and extends roughly 330 feet from its landward connection. The proposed pier includes a 16-foot-wide by 60-foot-long, perpendicular T- head at the seaward end. The combined length of the proposed main pier and T-head is intended to extend roughly the same distance as the existing pier into the water. The plan area of proposed pier will be located almost entirely within the existing pier’s footprint except for approximately 694 square feet located at the existing 8-foot- wide section of main pier and the proposed T-head. The footprint of the proposed pier overall, however, corresponds to an approximately 2,300 square-foot reduction in area from the existing, including the approximately 210 square foot area of the proposed ramp and stair access system, located entirely with existing paved or otherwise improved areas which were not counted in the existing structure’s footprint. Accordingly, the proposed footprint seaward of the existing seawall corresponds to an approximately 2,510 square-foot reduction in area from that of the existing structure. The proposed pier will be supported on approximately 74 steel pipe piles, roughly half the number of existing timber piles. The combination of improvements described above are designed to improve the pier’s resiliency and public benefit while simultaneously reducing the frequency and scale of future maintenance and adverse environmental impacts. The process of developing and selecting the Pier Replacement alternatives involved site-specific metocean data analysis and coastal modeling to develop design environmental loading conditions over a range of predicted wind, water level, wave, and other coastal conditions including the 100-year recurrence interval. This process included but was not limited to evaluation of design hydrostatic, hydrodynamic, wave impacts, debris impacts, local scour (around piles), and sea level rise scenarios. The NOAA 2017 intermediate sea level rise projection was used to predict the future (2070) mean 100-year recurrence interval stillwater level of elevation 12 feet (NAVD88). Observations made by State and City representatives over recent years, combined with available engineering reports regarding the existing structure’s performance, deterioration, and apparent failure pathways were also used to inform the alternative development. Each alternative design included typical improvements to increase resiliency, mitigate exposure, and minimize adverse environmental impacts. These improvement strategies involved the use of stronger and more durable materials, reduced number of piles and overall pile impact area, and reduced decking surface area and layout adjustments to provide a more efficient relationship between area and function. The alternative replacement designs included a range of proposed deck elevations above and including the existing structure’s deck height to further mitigate risk, expected frequency, magnitude, and implications associated with storm and wave-related damage. Based on the results of this analysis, there was limited relative advantage or resiliency benefit associated with elevating the deck of the proposed pier above elevation 13.0 feet (NAVD88). Although the proposed pier deck is below FEMA BFE 16 feet (NAVD88), this height does not provide adequate context for this structure. To clarify, elevating the deck of the structure above elevation 16 feet (NAVD88) does not directly correspond to reduced public safety hazards or predicted damage, rather it may encourage use of the pier during dangerous conditions and does not consider that the landward area of the site would not be accessible either. Predicted damages that exceed typical coastal wear and tear are more closely associated with lower frequency, extreme wave conditions. Additionally, the minimum design modifications July 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM DMF-21002, Recreational Fishing Pier, Salem Willows Park 18.0174941.00 Page | 18 necessary to facilitate incrementally higher deck elevations corresponded to disproportionate construction and maintenance cost increases, accessibility obstacles, reduced functionality and value, and increase disturbance and permanent impact of resource areas. J.ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POPULATIONS In accordance with the document entitled “Transition Rules for Public Involvement Requirements for Environmental Justice Populations – Effective as of June 24, 2021,” issued by the MEPA Office to address public involvement protocols for environmental justice (EJ) populations, this section will provide a list of the EJ populations within 1 mile of the project site (or within 5 miles if the project is anticipated to effect air quality) and an evaluation of whether the project is reasonably likely to negatively affect such EJ populations. On July 7, 2021, GZA accessed the EOEAA’s web-based “EJ Mapping Tool” via the hyperlink provided on the above- referenced “Transition Rules” document. GZA used the “EJ Mapping Tool” to identify MA 2020 Environmental Justice Block Groups near the project site. The project is not anticipated to affect air quality, therefore GZA identified the mapped EJ populations within 1 mile of the project site. Additionally, the project is not considered reasonably likely to negatively affect such EJ populations, since the project is intended to provide a safe, functional, publicly accessible, recreational fishing pier for the benefit of all populations in Massachusetts. GZA identified six EJ populations within 1 mile of the project site. The six identified EJ populations are located within the Cities of Salem and Beverly, Massachusetts. Table 7 lists published details provided by the “EJ Mapping Tool” regarding the various identified EJ populations. Refer to Attachment 6 for a map of the EJ populations within 1 mile of the project site, generated by the “EJ Mapping Tool.” Table No. 7 – Mapped Environmental Justice Populations within 1 mile of the Project Site County City Block Group Census Tract EJ Population Criteria Essex Beverly 2 2174 Income Essex Beverly 4 2174 Minority and Income Essex Beverly 4 2176 Income Essex Beverly 5 2175 Income Essex Salem 1 2045 Minority Essex Salem 4 2044 Minority and Income j:\174900's\18.0174941.00 dmf salem willows handicap fishing pier\work\permitting\01_mepa\enf_cover-narrative-dividers_salem willows pier.docx