The URL can be used to link to this page

Goody Clancy Study Vol. 1 Report Volume I I . -DLuuy Ul J . Michael Ruane Judicial Center Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 Salem, Massachusetts April 4, 2007 ARCHITECTURE GOODYPLANNING PRESERVATION CLANCY Volume r study for I Michael Ruane Judicial Center Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 Salem, Massachusetts April 4, 2007 Volume i Preface ii Acknowledgements PAGE 1 Executive Summary 1 1.1 Project Justification 1.2 Project Summary 1.3 Space Program Summary 1.4 Project Budget 1.5 Implementation and Phasing Plan 1.6 Issues for Final Design 2 Project Design Goals 7 2.1 Introduction 2.2 AOTC Goals for Courthouse Design 2.3 DCAM Goals for Courthouse Design 2.4 Designer Goals for Salem Trial Court Design GOODYARCHITECTURE PLANNING PRESERVATION CLANCY 3 Documentation of Project Site 13 3.1 Overview 3.2 Site Description 3.3 Historic Context 3.4 Visual Context 3.5 Neighborhood Context 3.6 Current Use and Historical Use of Site 3.7 Existing Buildings on Site 3.8 Corollary/Related Projects 3.9 Transportation/Parking/Traffic 3.10 Site Survey,Zoning,Easements 3.11 Topography 3.12 Utilities 3.13 Existing Uses 3.14 Sustainable Design Considerations 3.15 LEED Checklist 3.16 Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures 4 Design Requirements 49 4.1 Building Design Concept Principles:AOTC/DCAM 4.2 Building Design Concept Principles:Designer's Statement 4.3 Site Design Concept Principles:AOTC/DCAM 4.4 Site Design Concept Principles:Designer's Statement 4.5 Building Systems Standards:AOTC/DCAM 4.6 Building Systems Standards:Designer's Statement 5 Building Program 103 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Salem Demographics 5.3 Building User Descriptions 5.4 Description of Court Departments 5.5 Programming Process 5.6 Recent Trends in Courthouse Design 5.7 The Trial Court in Essex County 5.8 Space Inventory 5.9 Program Changes 5.10 Floor Area Calculations J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis 169 6.1 The Regulatory Context for Courthouses 6.2 The Massachusetts State Building Code,Sixth Edition(780 CMR) 6.3 Jurisdiction of Local Zoning or Other Authorities 6.4 The Massachusetts State Plumbing Code 6.5 Accessibility Laws 6.6 Environmental Permitting 6.7 Air and Noise 6.8 Sight and Sound Separation for Juveniles 6.9 Limited English Proficiency Requirements for Signage in State Courthouses 6.10 Recommendations During Final Design 6.11 Preliminary Code Analysis 6.12 Detention Facilities 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 179 7.1 Scope Overview 7.2 Site Acquisition 7.3 Site Subdivision 7.4 Building Disposition 7.5 The First Baptist Church 7.6 Site Preparation Scope 7.7 Trial Court Building Overview 7.8 Trial Court Building Organization by Floor 7.9 Issues for Final Design 7.10 Concept Graphics 7.11 Outline Specification 7.12 Summary of Finishes and Systems 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 249 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Plan A 8.3 Plan B 8.4 Plan C 8.5 Scheme Al 8.6 Scheme A2 8.7 Scheme A3 8.8 Additional Studies J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs 261 9.1 Total Project Costs (DCAM,GCA,F&G) 9.2 Life Cycle Operations,Maintenance,and Renewal Costs 9.3 Cost Considerations for Final Design 10 Implementation Plan 295 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Site Acquisition and Site Preparation 10.3 Disposition of the Superior Court Building and the County Commissioner's Building 10.4 Construction of the J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center 10.5 Schedule 10.6 Renovation of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building 10.7 Procurement Method 10.8 Preliminary Project Schedule Volume II Al Appendix 1 A1.1 Salem Site Evaluation Study,Site Options for the New Trial Courts Building,Goody Clancy, Draft:June 29,2006 A1.2 Salem Trial Courts Mechanical and Electrical Systems Analysis,SEi Companies(including renovation of Probate and Family Court Building)January 31,2006;HVAC Drawings,SEi Companies April 12,2006 A1.3 Site Survey:Existing Conditions Plan,Green International Affiliates,Inc.,February 2,2006 AI A Meeting Minutes A1.5 Global Workshop Presentation:J.Michael Ruane Justice Center and Salem Trial Court, Goody Clancy A1.6 Global Workshop Minutes:Summary of Meeting:J.Michael Ruane Justice Center and Salem Trial Court Global Workshop,April 13,2006 A1.7 Results of Limited Subsurface Investigation,Salem Department of Public Works,North Road and Bridge Street Interchange,Salem,Massachusetts,February 20,2003 A1.8 Salem Courts Expansion Study,Salem,Massachusetts,Evaluation of Site Utilities, Green International Affiliates,Inc.,July 2003 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy Volume III A2 Appendix 2 A2.1 Salem Probate and Family Court Existing Conditions Report,Goody Clancy, Draft:September 26,2005,Revised:November 11,2005 A2.2 Salem Probate and Family Court Space Program,DCAM,Draft-March 6,2006 A2.3 Chapter 34 Evaluation Renovation of the Probate and Family Court Building,Salem, Massachusetts,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center,Rolf Jensen&Associates,Inc.,April 19,2006; A2.4 Mechanical and Electrical Systems Analysis,Salem Trial Courts,SEi,February 13,2007; Mechanical Drawings,Salem New Trial Court,February 6,2007;Plumbing and Fire Protection Systems Analysis,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center,Salem,Massachusetts,Draft-February 2007 A2.5 Salem Additional Service—Alternate Plan B Draft Study, Task 9—Identify Possible Levels of Partial Renovation of the PFC,November 21,2006 A2.6 Asbestos,Lead Paint and Other Hazardous Materials Survey,Probate and Family Court Complex, ATC Associates Inc.,April 1,2006 A2.7 MEP HVAC Options for Minimal Renovation to PFC,Salem Courts,September 27,2006 A2.8 Salem Courts Expansion Study,Salem,Massachusetts,Structural Evaluation,Green International Affiliates,Inc.,July 2003 A2.9 Permitting Analysis,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center and Salem Trial Courts,Epsilon Associates, November 2005 A2.10Calculation of Water Usage and Discharge in New Court Facilities,DCAM,March 7,2007 Volume IV A3 Appendix 3 A3.1 Environmental Notification Form,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center,Salem Trial Courts, Epsilon Associates,Inc.,January 2,2007 A3.2 Certificate of the Secretary of Environmental Affairs on the Environmental Notification Form, February 22,2007 A3.3 Memo:DCAM,Proposed Trial Courts Expansion,Salem,Massachusetts,Pedestrian Improvement and Accommodations and Traffic Calming,Earth Tech,Inc.,February 7,2007 A3.4 Memo:DCAM,Proposed Trial Courts Expansion,Salem,Massachusetts,MBTA Garage Data— Traffic Analysis,February 8,2007 A3.5 Functional Design Report,Proposed Construction of a New Trial Court Facility,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center,Salem,Massachusetts,Earth Tech,Inc.,November 2006 A3.6 Salem Trial Courts Transportation Study,Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates,Inc.,May 2002 A3.7 Final Geotechnica/Data Report,North Street and Bridge Street Ramp Re-Alignment,Salem, Massachusetts,Nobis Engineering,October 14,2005 A3.8 Phase 1 and 11 Site Analysis,Detailed Review,ICON architecture,inc.,July 2003 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy Preface This study was prepared for the Office of Planning Design and Construction of the Division of Capital Asset Management,Commonwealth of Massachusetts,in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 29, Sections 7K and 26A.It is intended to investigate capital needs,evaluate alternatives,and recommend a solution that corresponds to the current needs of the Trial Court,in conformance with its current long term capital facilities development plan. The study provides a clear and detailed frame of reference for the design and implementation process and recommends a solution that can be accomplished within the appropriation or authorization for that project.It includes a space program which reflects the Trial Court's needs,a description of the project requirements,an accurate estimate of capital and operating costs,and an implementation schedule.Conceptual building designs,where included,are not intended to constrain the final design,but rather to illustrate functional relationships,demonstrate the practical operation of design criteria and conformance with applicable codes and standards,and serve as the basis for developing an accurate cost estimate. Before DCAM can enter into a contract for final design services,this study must be certified by the head of the Trial Court,and by the Director of the Court Facilities Unit and the Commissioner of DCAM.Thereafter no substantial changes can be made to the program during the implementation process.In no event shall the design work be such as would result in a change in the number of gross square feet to be constructed in the project of more than ten per cent from the number specified in this study. J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy Acknowledgements _ � � �* ram* W'r Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Administration and Finance Division of Capital Asset Management David B.Perini,Commissioner Office of Planning Design and Construction Michael McKimmey,Deputy Commissioner Michael B.Williams,Director of Programming Elizabeth A.Minnis,Director,Courts Facilities Unit Gail Rosenberg,Project Manager,Programming Ron Ferrara,Project Manager,Design and Construction Craig Holmes,Senior Cost Manager Office of the General Counsel Robert McGinness,General Counsel Freya Bernstein,Deputy General Counsel Carol Meeker,Deputy General Counsel Office of Real Estate H.Peter Norstrand,Deputy Commissioner Stephen Andrews,Deputy Director Warren Madden,Project Manager Office of Leasing Martha Goldsmith,Director Bruce Tebo,Senior Leasing Program Manager Gayle Clifford,Program Manager J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy Office of Facilities Maintenance Tom Tagan,Program Manager Administrative Office of the Trial Courts Robert A.Mulligan,Chief Justice for Administration and Management Michael Jordan,Director,Court Capital Projects Hon.Gregory C.Flynn,Presiding Justice,Waltham District Court Richard L'heureux,Manager,Programming,Planning&Design Margaret Cavanaugh,Administrative Attorney LAW LIBRARY Marnie Warner,Director Richard Adamo,Law Librarian,Essex County Trial Court Personnel SUPERIOR COURT Hon.Barbara Rouse,Chief Justice Thomas A.Driscoll,Jr.,Superior Court Clerk Magistrate John O'Brien,Superior Court Clerk DISTRICT COURT Hon.Lynda M.Connelly,Chief Justice Hon.Robert A.Cornetta,Presiding Justice Robert Arena,District Court Clerk Magistrate Dolores Reyes-Gormley,Chief Probation Officer PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT Hon.Sean N.Dunphy,Chief Justice Hon.John Stevens,First Justice Pamela Casey O'Brien,Register of Probate Terry Carfazzo,Assistant Register of Probate Mark D.Juknavorian,Chief Probation Officer JUVENILE COURT Hon.Martha P.Grace,Chief Justice Hon.Sally Padden,First Justice Judy Brennan,Juvenile Court Clerk Magistrate J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy HOUSING COURT Hon.Steven D.Pierce,Chief Justice Paul J.Burke,Director of Operations Court Administrator Harvey Chopp ESSEX COUNTY COURT FACILITIES Jay Leonard,Courts Facilities Director State Officials Senator Frederick Berry Representative John Keenan City of Salem Mayor Kimberley Driscoll Lynn Duncan,Director,Department of Planning and Community Development Bruce Thibodeau,City Engineer The Salem Partnership Historic Salem Inc. Federal Street Neighborhood Alliance Salem Courthouse Steering Committee MassHighway Neil Boudreau,State Traffic Engineer Steve McLaughlin,Project Manager Consultants Goody Clancy Joan Goody,FAIA,Principal-in-Charge Jean Carroon,AIA,Principal Paul Dudek,AIA,Project Manager,Study George Perkins,AIA,Project Manager,Design Michael Joyce,AIA,Project Architect SEi Companies MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Don Haiges,P.E.,Principal-in-Charge Mark Warren,P.E.,Facilities Director Mike Fournier,P.E.,Associate Principal J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy Judith Nitsch CIVIL ENGINEERING Bill Doyle,P.E.,LEED,Project Manager Gerald Blumenthal,Senior Project Manager Lim Consultants STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Lee Lim,Principal Carol R. Johnson &Associates, Inc. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Harry S.Fuller,Executive Vice President Kate Thompson,Senior Associate DMC Engineering, Inc. PLUMBING ENGINEERING Daniel Carson,President Raymond McCrary,Principal Falk Associates, Inc. SPECIFICATIONS Stephen Falk Rolf Jensen &Associates CODE CONSULTANTS David LeBlanc,P.E.,Engineering Manager Faithful and Gould COST ESTIMATING Neil Fontana,Senior Consultant Epsilon Associates PERMITTING/HISTORIC Laura Rome,Senior Consultant Douglas Kelleher,Senior Planner Earth Tech TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Nicholas Rubino,Senior Project Manager Dennis Flynn,Traffic Engineer Project Professional 1 Executive Summary } N4 I.I 10 o 1.1 Project Justification The purpose of this project is to replace the Commonwealtlis outdated judicial facilities in downtown Salem serving Southern Essex County.Currently the courts are housed in four buildings;the Superior Court is located in two interconnected buildings on Federal Street; Probate and Family Court is located directly adjacent on Federal Street,and the District Court is housed in a building on Washington Street at the corner of Church Street,one block away.Housing Court currently holds sessions in the Juvenile Court leased facility building.The Jury Pool meets in leased space in the Tabernacle Church on Federal Street across from the Superior Court building.Juvenile Court leases space at Shetland Park,an industrial park on Congress Street,approximately one mile away. The project will be the fulfillment of a preliminary Master Plan completed in August 2004 which proposed the creation of a"courts campus"to bring together different court departments in order to offer comprehensive services and take advantage of shared resources. 1 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 1 Executive Summary 1.2 Project Summary The project will meet the goals of the original Master Plan by constructing a new Trial Court building to house the Superior Court,District Court,Juvenile Court and Housing Court.The Law Library will be accommodated in the relocated First Baptist Church building.Renovation of the existing Probate and Family Court building(also currently housing the Registry of Deeds)for the sole use of the Probate and Family Court was originally included in the scope but has been placed on hold pending funding.The unanticipated rapid escalation of construction costs since 2004 has reduced the intended scope of the project to fit the project budget.The study for the renovation of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building will be completed and certified at a later date when funding is available. FIGURE 1A Location Plan 3' �`�� 8 � � M11�z o ❑ �� C � GC o +� NORTH RIVER 8 � f A CD cc•� FEDERALST --- - [l� �� ❑130 ai ;ae L__111 EON Ev sr LAC 2 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 1 Executive Summary FIGURE 1B Site Plan with 1/4-mile context Existing Court Buildings: A Probate and Family Court/ 9 NORTH RIVER Registry of Deeds 4 B Superior Court S] C County Commissioner's Building y v D District Court BRIDGE Si O O 4 • PROPOSED -\ Q TRIAL COURT BUILDING A -- --FEDERALST IJ J3. o D o SITE ASSEMBLY After the decision was made to locate the new Trial Court building adjacent to the Probate and Family Court building on Federal Street,and in order to have a site large enough to accommodate the proposed Trial Court Building,DCAM had to assemble a parcel by acquiring several different properties,both private and municipal. The land acquisition process was complicated and involved the purchase of three mixed use/residential properties(58,60 and 62 Federal Street),the transfer of a city-owned parcel (granted to DCAM by a unanimous vote of the Salem City Council on November 16,2005) to the Commonwealth and the removal of an interchange ramp from North Street to Bridge Street.Crucial to the project was the acquisition of the First Baptist Church of Salem,which is in the final stages of being resolved.The resulting 3.1 acre site will be bounded by a line between the Probate and Family Court and the Superior Court and County Commissioner's buildings to the east,Federal Street to the south,North Street to the west and Bridge Street to the north(see Figures 1A and 1B). 3 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 1 Executive Summary 1.3 Space Program Summary The proposed Trial Court Building is programmed to be 175,412 GSF.The current plans total 19O,O71 GSF.During the design phase,every effort will be made to bring the building square footage into line with the program.The courtroom wing facing Bridge Street will be six stories high(88 ft);the pavilion wing fronting on Federal Street will be four stories high(60 ft). The courtroom wing houses the Superior Court(four courtrooms in two court sets)with judges and juries on the 4th floor,the District Court and Housing Court(three District Court courtrooms and one courtroom for Housing in two court sets)with associated judges and juries on the 3rd floor;Superior Court Probation, Superior Court Clerk Magistrate, Housing Court Clerk Magistrate and the jury Pool on the 2nd floor and the District Arraignment Court,District Court Probation and District Court Clerk Magistrate on the 1st floor.The lower level houses a central holding area for detainees,loading dock,storage, maintenance shop and parking for the judges. The pavilion wing houses the juvenile Court with judges and juries on the 4th floor; two juvenile Court courtrooms(one court set)on the 3rd floor;the juvenile Court Clerk Magistrate on the 2nd floor;juvenile Court Probation on the 1st floor and the District Attorney and the Grand jury in the lower level. Total number of courtrooms is eleven.Five courtrooms are planned for the renovated Registry of Deeds/Family and Probate Court,which is not part of this project. Nineteen secure parking spaces will be provided on the site for judges and senior staff. TABLE 1A Courtroom Summary COURT NO.OF COURTROOMS LOCATION Superior Court 4 On Level 4 Juvenile Court 2 On Level 3 Housing Court 1 On Level 3 District Court 4 On Levels 1&3 Probate and Family Court (5) (In PFC) 1.4 Project Budget The amount approved for this project is $106,000,000.The construction budget for the proposed Trial Court building is$81,613,401. 4 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 1 Executive Summary 1.5 Implementation and Phasing Schedule Assuming this Certifiable Building Study will be certified by April 2,2007,the project schedule is as follows: t Study through pres-04.07 Certification 2 MHD North Street 03.07-11.07 Design and Construction 3 Disposition of 05.07-11.07 Federal Street houses 4 Design and Contruction of 05.07-12.07 Church Foundation and Relocation 5 Design of New Building 05.07-05.08 5 Construction of New Building 03.08-07.10 including Site Prep 7 Occupancy 08.10-09.10 For the schedule to be maintained as outlined above,the following tasks must be completed by June of 2008: 1 The reconstruction of the North Street/Federal Street intersection must be complete so the North Street/Bridge Street interchange ramp can be removed from the site. 2 DCAM must take possession of the First Baptist Church,perform an existing conditions survey and demolish the rear addition. 3 The buildings at 58,60&62 Federal Street must be removed from the site. 4 Foundations for the church must be constructed and the church moved to its final location at the corner of Federal Street and North Street. 5 Existing site drainage structures must be relocated on the site. 1.6 Issues for Final Design A Reconcile proposed design gross floor area with program gross floor area. B Further refinement of program C Perform an existing conditions survey and Chapter 34 analysis of the First Baptist Church building to determine accessibility requirements. D Perform more extensive geotechnical investigation to select most cost effective foundation system. E Establish property lines for the full site. F Analyze fire separation strategies between new Trial Court Building and existing Probate and Family Court Building. 5 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 1 Executive Summary G Analyze fire separation strategies between new Trial Court Building and relocated Church/Law Library. H Determine extent of Detainee Tunnel connecting to PFC to be constructed with the proposed new Trial Court building. I Determine if provisions should be built into the Trial Court building for a future enclosed pedestrian bridge connecting to the PFC. J Locate steel braced frames in both orthogonal directions to avoid and/or reduce the cost of moment frame connections to stabilize the building against wind and seismic forces.Cost estimate is based on braced frames with no moment connections. K Life cycle cost analysis calculations refinements. L Operations,maintenance and renewal cost calculations refinements. M Energy modeling N Data sheets O Verify construction type of First Baptist Church 6 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 2 Project Design Goals f 2.1 Introduction The purpose of this section is to identify performance requirements that the project must meet to support the goals of DCAM and AOTC. The goals of the two organizations are very closely linked and,in some cases,overlap. For the purposes of this document,the operational goals are listed as AOTC goals and the building performance goals are labeled DCAM goals due to the differing roles each agency plays in the life of the facility. The design of the new J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center will be evaluated on how well it meets the following performance requirements. Following DCAM and AOTC goals is a statement of the Designer's goals. 2.2 AOTC Goals For Courthouse Design A TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT AND COST-EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Providing multiple court department in a single"justice center"for sharing resources • Designing the courthouse for internal flexibility of space assignments including office space and courtroom uses • Grouping courtrooms to minimize the need for large public waiting areas and maximize the use of courtroom support elements. • Locating high traffic areas(departments and courtrooms)on lower floors • Designing all work spaces with staff effectiveness and well-being in mind • Incorporating opportunities for future upgrading of systems such as security and electronic work flow • Ensuring that courtrooms and meeting rooms can be used flexibly 7 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 2 Project Design Goals B TO DESIGN A FACILITY THAT SUPPORTS THE COURTS ADDRESSING A WIDE RANGE OF CHALLENGES Making dispute resolution more efficient and accessible to the community,and maximizing the opportunities to provide user-oriented justice.This can be achieved by: • Designing the building so that the community perceives it as a physical and social asset • Accommodating multiple court department in a single"justice center" • Locating under the same roof the ancillary functions that support the work of the court such as a law library,clinics,and space for victims and witnesses. C TO REINFORCE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COURT IN SOCIETY AS A PLACE WHERE CITIZENS PARTICIPATE IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Designing the building to communicate dignity as well as openness. • Ensuring that design supports the public's needs including wayfinding,waiting and access to services • Designing the building for universal access for the public regardless of their status and ability. • Designing the courthouse so that it can be used for non-court public functions without sacrificing security. D TO ENSURE THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF ALL COURT STAFF AND USERS.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Providing completely separate circulation systems for the public,staff and detainees. • Designing the courthouse so that it is easily monitored by staff as well as electronics. • Coordinating design decisions with technology and staffcapacity to ensure that all contribute to a secure environment. E TO ENHANCE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE BY CREATING A SUPPORTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY.Innovations in technology provide court users with an array of options to assist in court-related business and practices.These technological advances can increase efficiency,making better use of resources, save time and reduce costs.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Designing this courthouse to be able to adopt new technologies as they are developed. 2.3 DCAM Goals for Courthouse Design A TO SUPPORT THE NEEDS OF THE USER AGENCY.The primary goal of DCAM is to effectively design buildings that support the mission,organization and operations 8 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 2 Project Design Goals of the client agencies.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • The spatial organization of program elements and building circulation should be logical and clear and support the workflow of the Agency. • The design of the site and the building must facilitate the management of multiple activities and needs of the user agency and the public at large. • The building organization and design balances the essential requirement for security of all personnel,visitors and court operations with the important value of a justice system serving all citizens. • Construction materials,resources and finishes should be designed for durability and ease of maintenance to control operating budgets. B TO DESIGN BUILDINGS THAT RESPECT AND REFLECT LOCAL URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.Public buildings are important landmarks in their respective communities and they have a civic responsibility to relate to their immediate physical surroundings as they define the public space that surrounds them.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Provide accessible pedestrian access to the site. • Design the building to respond to its physical context, with respectful acknowledgement to its environment. • Address the site so that the perimeter enlivens the edges and strengthens the connections to the retail and residential neighborhood. • Provide interesting open space that can be used and enjoyed by the public without compromising building security. C TO ENSURE THAT PUBLICLY FUNDED BUILDINGS REFLECT THE WISE USE OF TAXPAYERS'INVESTMENT BY CAREFUL ATTENTION TO FLEXIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY CONSIDERATIONS.The design of the Commonwealths buildings must balance short term and long term benefits and costs to ensure long term useful life and capacity for changes in use.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Optimizing opportunities for sharing of resources and efficiencies of organization and operation. • Meeting the program requirements for flexibility to accommodate future changes in service delivery by the user agency. • Organizing spaces to optimize future reallocation of program functions while maintaining separate circulation and security zoning. • Provide a flexible infrastructure to meet today's technological needs and anticipate future changes including more remote conferencing and increased electronic capacity throughout the facility. 9 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 2 Project Design Goals D TO EMPLOY UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES.It is DCAM's goal to design public buildings as inclusive places serving all users regardless of their physical and mental abilities,language,age,size,gender,ethnicity or economic circumstances. This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Locating public spaces,building entrances,and building amenities to facilitate wayfinding and equitable access without need for separate,specialized features. • A human centered design that enables diverse users to comprehend and access the programs and services of the justice system,meet fundamental needs,and understand the dignity and seriousness of court proceedings. E TO ACHIEVE A DEGREE OF SUSTAINABILITY THAT MINIMIZES NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND MAXIMIZES FEATURES THAT CONSERVE NATURAL RESOURCES.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Careful and comprehensive application of the design principles for environmentally- sustainable buildings including daylighting,natural ventilation,resource recovery, and reduction in use of non-renewable resources. • Meet LEED standards specified elsewhere in this document F TO MAKE PUBLIC BUILDINGS THAT CONVEY A PUBLIC-SPIRIT,CIVIC MINDEDNESS, INNOVATION,ACCESSIBILITY AND SOCIAL PERMANENCE.This shall be achieved through the following performance requirements: • Using the exterior expression of the building to reinforce the function it houses. • Expressing monumental or special spaces,if there are any,in massing,skin patterns,windows and other facade elements. • Arranging spaces to convey the impression of order and decorum. • Using durable materials that convey a sense of permanence and strength. 2.4 Designer Goals for Salem Trial Court A TO DESIGN A COURTHOUSE THAT IS IN SCALE WITH ITS SURROUNDINGS—which range from the combination of smaller institutional and residential buildings that front on Federal Street to the more industrial scale of Bridge Street,facing the MBTA Commuter Rail Station and the North River. B TO CAPITALIZE ON THE TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE,including the 15-foot grade change from Federal to Bridge Streets and the high visibility from the MBTA and surrounding roads of the Bridge Street facade which makes it(particularly at the North Street corner)a gateway to Salem. 10 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 2 Project Design Goals C TO DESIGN A NEW COURTHOUSE THAT MEETS CONTEMPORARY COURT NEEDS AND RESPECTS SALEM'S ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER:a design that complements the distinctive and varied styles of the adjacent buildings and the city. D TO MAXIMIZE THE POSITIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ON SALEM'S DOWNTOWN AND NEIGHBORHOODS by extending its tradition of historic preservation and historically compatible new construction while providing a larger court complex to bolster the City's economy. E TO ADJUST STREET LINES AND CURB CUTS(WHERE NECESSARY)TO RESPECT AND IMPROVE LOCAL TRAFFIC PATTERNS.To provide safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian movement to the courthouse and to the downtown and neighborhoods, taking into consideration the Central Transportation Improvement Study of Salerrf s downtown(November 2005). F TO RE-USE EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE. G TO PROVIDE A VISUAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE NEW COURTHOUSE COMPLEX, NORTH STREET,AND THE FEDERAL STREET NEIGHBORHOOD,acknowledging the view corridor from upper Federal Street across North Street. 11 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 2 Project Design Goals 12 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site f .T t L err r•- i ��J. � hh1 `+ = ' e 3.1 Overview SITE CONTEXT&ANALYSIS GOALS An analysis of the existing and proposed Salem Trial Courts site was conducted to gather information and make observations about the attributes and characteristics of the site in order to inform the planning of the proposed project.The following primary goals will be met throughout this project based on the site analysis: • Preserve and protect the significant historic resources that include three buildings listed on the National Register. Build a visually compatible,state of the art court building that provides continuity in its site and building design. • Contribute to the community character as well as the court complex itself. • Provide a robust court facility that compliments all three historic court buildings. • Coordinate with corollary highway and parking projects for maximum benefit for the project and the larger area. 3.2 Site Description The Salem Trial Courts are located at the edge of a historically significant downtown in the city of Salem,Massachusetts(see Figure 3A).The city itself(population-42,000)is 16 miles north of the capital city of Boston,and in the heart of Essex County.The courts draw people from throughout this area and are an important part of the economy as well as the built fabric of the town center. The three court buildings,the County Commissioners Building,the Superior Court and the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds are situated on a city block bounded by Federal,Washington,Bridge and North Streets.An additional court building,the District Court,is located nearby on a site along Washington Street. 13 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 3A Location Plan q° e: 6 40O XM' p4� '� � O •�� .. NORTH RIVER _ ] n U �I � q FE T E R gz sT_ N� C. � LD LS:: Ess cl LEA ^ [ 6 �Li a " ❑ � �'1 £ti NORMgN ST 11 Q� GEoNErs T Many important destinations surround this block.The heart of Salenfs downtown is less than a five-minute walk to the southeast.The MBTA Commuter Rail and Bus Station are located the same distance to the northeast.The North River Canal,identified for future park improvements,lies to the northeast.A tight-knit,residential and commercial downtown neighborhood stretch to the south and west. 3.3 Historic Context HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT/TIMELINE Although today the City of Salem may be most well known as the site of the 1692 Salem Witchcraft Trials, Salerris development as a significant city within the northern Boston metropolitan area is an important part of considering redevelopment on the Salem Trial Courts site. 14 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Salem was first settled in the early 1600's as a fishing village and experienced early success as a town in the 1700's based on thriving international trade.The city established itself as the dominant seaport on the eastern seaboard;evidence of this maritime history is still visible in the historic structures throughout the city and the tight knit development pattern of the downtown.By 1790, Salem was the sixth largest city in the country and the richest per capita. The city continued to experience prosperous years through the 1800's,during which the local economy moved away from trade towards a manufacturing and retail economy. During this transition,a number of Salem s most important structures were built, including many of the buildings on the site.The first building on the Salem Trial Courts site was the First Baptist Church of Salem(constructed in 1805);the next,the County Commissioners Building,was erected in 1841.As the Superior Court was being built in 1862,other residential structures,including a c.1850 house on the site,were being constructed as the downtown continued to expand.The final court building,the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds,was constructed in 1909.Existing houses and a street were removed to accommodate this court building,resulting in a unique court complex that characterizes the north side of Federal Street.Three small houses(dating from the early 19th to early 20th century)remain near the southwest corner. As Salem continued to grow and prosper,Irish and French Canadian immigrants poured into the city to work in its new leather and shoe factories or at the Naumkeag Steam Cotton Company.As of 1914 the population of Salem had swelled to 40,000.By that time the Salem Trial Courts Complex was operating as the heart of the judicial system for Essex County,adding jobs and associated services to the local economy. In the later half of the 20th century Salems economy transformed once again,this time moving away from industry towards a service economy.As the county seat,the Trial Court services and facilities continued to expand,adding the District Court building in 1976 on the other side of Washington Street—splitting services for the first time between sites within the downtown.Modernization of the existing facilities was limited to an addition on the Bridge Street side of the existing Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds Building in 1979. As part of the evolution of the city's service economy, Salem s redevelopment philosophy shifted to preservation in the 1970's,which helped stimulate Salenfs budding tourist industry.Maintaining Salems architectural resources and highlighting the Salem Witchcraft Trials became central attractions.Tourism,health care and higher education are currently the foundations of the current Salem economic base. 15 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Today,Salem has 42,000 residents and as many as one million visitors annually who come to enjoy the downtown and view its historic and architectural treasures.The Salem Trial Courts continue to be an important part of the City's architectural as well as economic resources. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ANALYSIS The Salem Trial Courts Complex and the Federal Street area are currently recognized as significant historic resources through both federal and state designation and should be sensitively restored,re-used,or added to with these protections in mind.The Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds,Superior Court and County Commissioners Buildings are currently part of the Essex County Court Buildings listed on the National Register of Historic Places,and the entire site is listed on the State Register as part of the Federal Street Historic District.These designations will ensure cooperation with state and local authorities when planning any restoration,re-use or new construction activities. 3.4 Visual Context GATEWAY&RELATION TO COMMUNITY The Salem Trial Courts stand out as a group of architecturally significant buildings at the north entryway to the center of the city of Salem.The buildings are visible from major transportation routes,notably the approach on Route 114 from Peabody and the Commuter Rail.The court building facades add a stately presence along Federal Street(see Figure 3B), where their entrances are located.Although of different styles they form a coherent group of structures at the edge of a dense mixed-use neighborhood and represent contributions to the distinctive visual character of the street and the larger district.The Federal Street Historic District National Register nomination comments on the cohesive quality of the Courts Complex site,noting that it is"characterized by contrasts of scale,architectural style and use which successfully synthesize into a single entity."It further observes that"the contrast of the monumental institutional buildings on the north side of the street with the row of houses facing them defines the character of the district." The First Baptist Church(see Figure 3C)is a strong contributor to this visual impression. On the other hand,the small residential buildings next to the church,a remnant of the residential cluster removed for the construction of the courts,are out of scale with the larger structures on the site and appear isolated against North Street and the highway ramp connecting to Bridge Street. The Bridge Street(north) side of the site is radically different the Federal Street side of the block in terms of scale,traffic speed and visual character.There is a 13 to 15 foot drop in grade from Federal Street to Bridge Street.The lower levels of the buildings facing Bridge 16 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 36 Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deed,Superior Court,County Commissioners Building FIGURE 3c First Baptist Church Y Street contain service and/or parking areas;these areas serve as(and look like) "the back door" (see Figure 3D).However,the north faces of these buildings are highly visible to many people passing on the commuter trains,by foot or by car.Bridge Street is a major arterial road and is being upgraded to enhance vehicular traffic. The North Street side of the site(Rte. 114)is another heavily trafficked,wide street and one of the main vehicular entries to the city.The northwest corner of any new structure will be very visible from here. 17 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 3D View looking down Bridge Street;cars are parked be- ■ neath the administration addition of the Probate and Family Court. - w�� a 3.5 Neighborhood Context CONTRIBUTION TO AREA The Salem Trial Courts create an important edge to the downtown,sitting between the heart of the mixed-use district and the North River,the commuter rail tracks and several major roadways.The buildings are also successfully integrated into the downtown by facing Federal Street and meeting the street edge.Although they are larger than the surrounding buildings,the grand entrances and high level of architectural detail make them appealing neighbors,and they add a civic presence that establishes the importance of the area.The court area also supports a significant number of ancillary law offices and commercial uses that have been integrated into surrounding residential-scale buildings. Salem residents take great pride in their city's historic buildings and have formed many neighborhood groups including Historic Salem,Alliance of Salem Neighborhoods,and Federal Street Neighborhood Association.The Federal Street neighborhood suffered major disconnections when both Washington Street and North Street were widened and became heavy traffic arteries.The residents,as represented by individuals who were appointed to a Citizens'Steering Committee formed by DCAM,are looking for opportunities to reconnect the east and west portions of that street both visually and by improved pedestrian patterns. ADJACENT SITE ISSUES While the site itself is for the most part institutional in nature,the surrounding area contains a mix of residential and commercial uses in residential buildings.Local residents 18 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site have expressed concern about increased vehicular traffic,pedestrian safety and the impact of a large facility on the character of their historic neighborhood.DCAM and Goody Clancy are committed to working with representatives of these neighborhood associations as the project moves forward into design to ensure that the historic qualities are maintained and that the area remains a walkable,livable neighborhood. POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACT When a site selection analysis was first being conducted for the courts project as part of the original master plan,a report was issued by the Salem Partnership,an independent local organization dedicated to fostering business initiatives for the city of Salem,outlining the economic benefits that the courts bring to the downtown.This report(2002)noted that the Court is the second largest employer in the city,and with the Registry of Deeds attracted approximately 1400 professionals and support staff to the city each day.Over 400 private attorneys with their support staff are located in Salem because of their proximity to the legal community.Other professionals peripherally connected with the court system include psychologists,social workers,and accountants.In addition to these professionals and their support staff,there are many secondary jobs that are created by the companies that provide services to the court-related businesses.It is estimated that the number of jobs created by the support businesses is over 1000.The economic return from these professionals and their staff working in Salem is significant,extending both direct and indirect benefits to the city's economy. 3.6 Current Use and Historical Use of Site CHANGING PROGRAMMATIC NEEDS Historically,the use of the site is characterized by a successive set of court buildings constructed over time to respond to the changing needs of the Essex County Government, which included the court system.As these functions expanded,space was created nearby to allow for coordinated activities.Buildings of a similar stature and quality were built to create a feeling of coordinated activities and to enhance the impression of judicial importance.Over the years,public buildings have come to dominate the site,previously mainly occupied by small residential structures. According to the Sanborn Fire Maps for the area,a gasometer was located on the parcel just behind the houses at 58-62 Federal Street,land now occupied by the North Street ramp. The gasometer appears on the 1890,1906 and 1950 Sanborn maps. Currently,the court buildings demonstrate the difficulties of continued use when faced with the need to respond to 21st century justice requirements and meet a higher level of 19 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site security needs.The site remains a relevant location for these uses and the historic buildings add a sense of municipal importance that is irreplaceable;however,several challenges are evident.Service to the site is difficult and parking is an issue,as is common in any dense urban area.Two of the buildings are not adaptable for current day court functions and cannot meet security and accessibility requirements due to their small scale and arrangement of functions over multiple levels. 3.7 Existing Buildings on the Site COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BUILDING,SUPERIOR COURT BUILDING The County Commissioners Building(Figure 3E),located on the corner of Federal Street and Washington Street(32 Federal Street),was designed by Richard Bond and erected in 1841.Made of grey granite,the courthouse is in Greek Revival Style with a temple front facing Federal Street.While the exterior is impressive in nature with its historic detail intact,the building's interior was stripped of most of its historic character in previous renovations.The building has three floors with a total of 12,354 net square feet(NSF).It currently houses offices for the Civil Clerk of Courts and the Superior Court Probation Department as well as record storage in the basement. FIGURE 3E Commissioners Building I The Superior Court building(figure 3F) (1861-1891)at 34 Federal Street was designed by Simeon Flint and constructed in distinct red sandstone in an Italianate,Romanesque Revival style.It has four floors with a total of 35,316 NSF.Major spaces are three courtrooms,the Essex County Law Library and the Clerk of Courts.The law library retains its original architectural features and furnishings. A connection was built between the two buildings in the 1990's,which also provided an entrance at the center which is no longer used due to security issues.A summary of findings by ICON architecture(September 2003)noted that the buildings had small floor plates,multiple level changes,no separate circulation systems(judges and detainees use public corridors)and unenclosed egress stairs.Also noted was that at the exterior,the joint 20 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 3F Superior Court Mir - I h� - � - Il�i Ask . facilities lack an accessible entrance route coinciding with that used by the general public. The layout of the interior spaces is not in conformance with the current access regulations. The primary heating source for these buildings is steam from the central steam plant located in a subbasement of the Registry of Deeds/Probate and Family Court building. The heating and ventilating equipment and distribution systems are antiquated and need replacing.There is no central air conditioning system in either building;window mounted air conditioners are used in selective areas. Reuse studies by ICON architecture demonstrated the infeasibility of utilizing the Superior Court and County Commissioner's buildings to accommodate current court program requirements.Upon completion of the new facility,the buildings will no longer be used for court functions.DCAM is currently in the planning stages of the disposition process to be undertaken as a separate project. PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT/REGISTRY OF DEEDS Designed in classical revival style by Phineas Alpers,the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds(Figure 3G)was constructed in 1909,with a grey granite facade alongside the Superior Court building,completing the complex that at its time was a state of the art judicial facility.In 1976,a five-story addition was constructed to the rear of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds,originally to house Essex County administrative functions (Figure 3H.) 21 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 3G Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds FIGURE 3H Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds rear addition An existing conditions survey by Goody Clancy(Salem Probate and Family Court Existing Conditions Report,Draft September 26,2005/Revised November 11,2005,Appendix A2.1) found that the exterior of the building was in generally good condition with some defective conditions requiring restoration.The public entrance has been recently made accessible with a nicely detailed ramp.On the interior,the Session I courtroom,the entry lobby,the monumental stair,the open elevator cage and the east-west public corridors on the first and second floors have retained their original finishes and details,are in generally good condition and are worthy of restoration and preservation.New accessible public toilets have been recently completed in the lower level.The former Bar Association area on the basement level underwent asbestos abatement and renovation for use by the Probate& 22 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Family Court Probation Department.Other recent improvements include the installation of a new roof and life safety upgrades. A hazardous material survey on the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building was issued on April 1,2006(Appendix A2.6). Conceptual studies by Goody Clancy have demonstrated that the building can be adapted to accommodate the program requirements for sole use by the Family Probate and Family Court.With the exception of the spaces marked for reuse and preservation,it is recommended that the building undergo a gut rehab with all new mechanical and electrical systems.Preliminary layout alternatives were discussed with representatives from the AOTC and Probate&Family Court and will be developed further when the funding is approved for the renovation. The First Baptist Church of Salem(Figure 3I),constructed of red brick in 1806 and subsequently modified in the mid-nineteenth century in the First Renaissance Revival style, is set back 70 feet from Federal Street creating a forecourt with lawn and mature trees. According to church records,additions in the rear date from 1837,1885 and 1909(Figure 3J).After sustaining significant structural damage due to a storm,the steeple was removed from the church in 1926 and never replaced. FIGURE M First Baptist Church FIGURE 31 First Baptist Church rear additions R �I •' s 23 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Given that the rear addition does not have the same historical value as the original section of the building,this study recommends the demolition of the addition and the relocation to the corner of Federal Street and North Street and preservation of the sanctuary portion of the building for use as the Law Library.This will make room for the proposed Trial Court Building and contribute to preserving the historic streetscape.The resulting footprint of the Church will be 4,536 NSF.When combined with a full basement of the same size this will yield 9,072 NSF.The structure will require an existing conditions survey prior to demolition and moving and may require additional analysis and documentation as part of the consultation process with MassHistoric. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS To the west of the First Baptist Church on Federal Street are three wood frame residential buildings(figure 3K):58(built c.1850),60(built c. 1810)and 62 (built c.1900) Federal Street.They were acquired by the Commonwealth as part of the site assemblage process in January 2007.58 Federal(the closest building to the First Baptist Church)contains four residential units.60 Federal consists of an office on the first and second floors and an apartment unit in a portion of the second floor.62 Federal Street is a rooming house. All three of the buildings are in poor condition.These buildings occupy the proposed new location of the church building at the prominent corner portion of the site,and are not suitable for use by any court functions.Additionally,they are not appropriately scaled to relate to the proposed new Trial Court building.The study recommends the removal of these three buildings,preferably by private relocation. FIGURE 3K Houses at 58,60,62 Federal Street 24 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 3.8 Corollary/Related Projects There are a number of related projects ongoing in the immediate vicinity of the court project. BRIDGE STREET MassHighway is in the process of a major renovation of Bridge Street,a portion of which is currently under construction as the Bridge Street Bypass Road.The old rotary at the intersection of Bridge and Washington Streets has been replaced by a signalized intersection;other road improvements are in progress at the Beverly Bridge end of Bridge Street.Additional improvements are in design for Bridge Street from Washington to Flint Street. NORTH STREET MassHighway is also in the process of making improvements to North Street.In anticipation of impacts due to the courts project and coordination with DCAM for changes to the roadway,construction began last year starting at Mason Street to the north. The roadwork required to accommodate the traffic from the off ramp being removed as part of the courts project will be undertaken as a change order to the existing North Street Improvement contract. MBTA PARKING GARAGE Also in the area and of consequence to the courts project is a proposed MBTA Parking Garage.The MBTA has a 25%design for a garage that will accommodate 750-1000 cars and includes an upgraded Commuter Rail Station.Under an agreement between the MBTA and DCAM,the garage will provide between 150-250 designated spaces for courthouse parking during business hours.Currently,the MBTA does not have the funding to move ahead with the project,but DCAM's traffic analysis took into consideration the projections for the new parking facility.DCAM will continue to work with representatives from the MBTA to ensure coordination of both projects. NORTH CANAL STUDY The City of Salem completed a planning study Neighborhood Master Plan for the North River Canal Corridor in October 2003.The vision articulated in the study is to"create appropriate development while preserving...historic neighborhood character", "address transportation issues for existing and new developments",and"enhance the public realm in keeping with[Salem s]neighborhood character.". 25 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 3.9 Transportation/Parking/Traffic Traffic and parking studies of the Trial Court as listed below have been prepared to study both existing conditions and the impact of the proposed new Trial Court facility.All are attached in the Appendices. Salem Trial Courts Transportation Study,Howard/Stein Hudson Associates,May 2002(A3.6); Functional Design Report, Proposed Construction of a New Trial Court Facility,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center,Salem,MA,Earth Tech,Inc.,2006(A3.5); Environmental Notification Form,J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center Salem Trial Courts, Epsilon Associates Inc.,2007(A3.1) TRANSPORTATION—COMMUTER RAIL The Trial Court complex is conveniently served by the MBTA commuter rail line with the station located on the north side of Bridge Street at the intersection with Washington Street.The distance from the station to the public entrance of the proposed Trial Court Building on Federal Street is approximately 800 feet.The distance from the station to the staff entrance of the Trial Court Building on Bridge Street is approximately 600 feet.The commuter rail line connects Salem with Swampscott,Lynn,Chelsea and Boston to the south and Beverly,Hamilton,Wenham,Rowley Newburyport,Manchester,Gloucester and Rockport to the north. TRANSPORTATION—BUS SERVICE MBTA bus routes 455/455W,456&459 make a loop circling the Trial Court site on Washington Street,Bridge Street and North Street.Route 455/455W and 459 connect Salem to Boston.Route 456 connects Salem to Lynn. PARKING While parking in downtown Salem can be challenging,six off-street public parking areas are located within three blocks of the Trial Court building:The Church Street Lot two blocks to the east on Federal Street;the Sewall Street Lot,one block south of Federal Street; the Salem Green Lot,one block south and one block east on Church Street;the Museum Place Garage,one block south and two blocks east on Church Street,the Crombie Street Lot two blocks south on Essex Street and the City and MBTA lots across Bridge Street.The proposed MBTA garage planned for the existing lots will provide much needed additional parking for the area(see figure 3L). The need for additional parking in the downtown area of Salem is well documented. The proposed MBTA garage is the most likely parking expansion opportunity,but the City of Salem is exploring other options as well. The majority of the court business is already in the area—within the existing buildings,so that parking demand is already within the 26 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 3L Public parking lots in n 53 vicinity of Trial Courts Salem Parking D8 Ing _ ,n d• y T mNuans.e� rn�F: - BTAL 1 .G � _ qsR` Bsldge 8freflt,J' �� 4e 1 ti 'r�Oc.IT s � s da&52 r SITE ____-FFCERRL s� Church Street .t�rtGv>q' wASH °T41+.So_.. s . - Lot comer ..Qfi105 -LTM1DEST- u uxuaFSalem. Muse urn Place t �: Green. Garage r SeW Lat x rraca�5lrGGt _� smuq � c aim LOT gsSEx PiaWu/ S= n a IT1/66Y1i yi Crorrt�ie _ sA qtl .StrIe4t T— SGRSS - �.N$L.'-• LbC., yr R'fOti SU HC6 � ��V�Tndi .� nkR. s He�+Htil A - tnOvi SY rmn"tree� + V lot-' +r`~South Harbor 1 Munfbipal* RB 5� Ga�ra�ie R 'GN£SS�y1 SHenalm 7a51 M1£W LI tJ �_ % Rqv Si nar Lr- ce❑uevOsr Riley ff n gi ' � -.. u.�0�pa❑G.r s7se�r � � pqV L- xuGn 57 r = LOOLL - rf�,gh � °❑'sr AAAN M1riu ai• l' 14 AR❑ST A downtown area. The new construction component of the project,in bringing the juvenile court back into the downtown and providing for future growth of court business will serve to increase the parking demand over time. This project will not provide any additional public parking as that is not within the scope or budget of the project. DCAM will continue to work with the City and the MBTA to provide the parking demand data for their efforts to develop the necessary parking capacity to meet the needs of both the courts and the other businesses and institutions in this area of the downtown. TRAFFIC The traffic evaluation for this study was based on field observations of existing roadway and traffic conditions,review of previous studies/reports and data(largely derived from studies related to the extensive North Street and Bridge Street reconstruction projects) and traffic capacity analyses. Earth Tech(DCAM's traffic consultant and also the MHD's designer for the North Street project)developed a detailed analysis of the impact of this project and the proposed change to the North Street/Bridge Street interchange on 18 nearby intersections within the Salem Central Business District.The proposed MBTA garage across Bridge Street,and other proposed roadway improvements were factored into the analysis. (Refer to Appendix A3.5) 27 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site The traffic analysis indicates a projected increase in traffic in the area due to this project and others proposed in the future. As part of this project DCAM is funding an adjustment to the North Street/Bridge Street interchange loop which will provide for a significant portion of the project site through the elimination of an existing access ramp. According to the traffic analysis,the changes that will be made at this interchange will result in overall improvement of the vehicular and pedestrian safety of this heavily traveled location. This intersection serves as a gateway to the downtown and provides direct pedestrian access to the adjacent MBTA commuter rail station. Ongoing coordination among DCAM,the Massachusetts Highway Department(MassHighway),and the MBTA will ensure pedestrian and bicycle accommodations are maintained and/or enhanced as a result of the project. The roadway improvements to the North Street/Bridge Street interchange will be carried out by MassHighway as part of the on-going North Street Reconstruction project,and will be consistent with state and federal plans and policies.DCAM and MassHighway will work closely with City officials to ensure consistency with the City of Salem s 1996 Master Plan Update and Action Plan and the Open Space and Recreation Plan currently being developed by the City's Planning Department. 3.10 Site Survey, Zoning, Easement THE SITE The boundaries of the site will be Federal Street to the south,North Street to the west, Bridge Street to the north and a new property line on the east side,down the access road between the Superior Court building and the Probate and Family Court building(PFC). The area of the site(including the Probate and Family Court)is approximately 136,500 square feet(3.1 acres).The Superior Court/County Commissioner's building will sit on an independent site. The new assembled site comprises the following parcels(see Figure 3M): 1 North Street/Bridge Street interchange ramp(formerly City-owned) 2 Three houses on Federal Street 3 First Baptist Church of Salem 4 Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds 28 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site FIGURE 3M Site Assembly Plan KEY TO BUILDINGS A Proposed Trial Court Building B First Baptist Church,existing / location PARCEL 1 BRIDG St C Probate and Family Court/ PARCEL 3 Registry of Deeds D 62 Federal Street A PARCEL 4 r- `. E 60 Federal Street ) F 58 Federal Street KEY TO PARCELS 1� 1 North Street/Bridge Street r interchange ramp(formerly + City-owned) 4 2 Three houses on Federal Street L e 3 First Baptist Church of Salem a Probate and Family Court/ C Registry of Deeds P j — r D t-E F— - o 50' 100 k ` FEDERAL ST ZONING ANALYSIS Although projects under the authority of the Commonwealth are not required to meet local zoning ordinances,a thorough zoning analysis was conducted to ensure that the redevelopment of the site respects local dimensional and site regulations where possible. The Salem Trial Court is in the Business 5 zoning district along with the city center that makes up the majority of this district.The analysis shown in Table 3A below indicates that the proposed Trial Court building and the Probate and Family Court on the new site will generally conform to the zoning requirements with two exceptions:the proposed Trial Court building will exceed the 70 foot maximum height allowed by zoning by 18 feet along Bridge Street and the minimum distance between buildings on a lot will not be met. 29 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site TABLE 3A Zoning Analysis NONRESIDENTIAL USES— NOTES NEW CONSTRUCTION Minimum Lot Area(sf) 2,000 For all categories Trial Court/PFC lot is 136,500 sf Minimum Lot Width lift) 30 For all categories Trial Court/PFC lot width is 495 ft Maximum Lot Coverage by all build- 50 For existing buildings 100% ings(%) Trial Court/PFC lot coverage is 46.70 Minimum width of side yard(ft) 5 For existing buildings no minimum Side yard at PFC when Superior Court/County Commissioner's building subdivided off will be approximately 24 ft Maximum height of building(ft) 70 For all categories Height of Trial Court building on Federal Street will be approx.60 feet from grade to roof.Height of Trial Court build- ing on Bridge Street will be approx.88 feet from grade to roof.Note:there will be a mechanical penthouse above the main roof 16 feet high. Maximum height of building(stories) 6 For all categories Trial Court building will be 6 stories on Bridge Street and 4 stories on Federal Street,not including mechanical pent- house. Maximum height offences and bor- 10 For all categories dering walls(ft) A screen wall/fence will be provided for Staff Secure Parking under and outside the proposed Trial Court building along Bridge Street. Minimum distance between build- Distance equal to height of Distance may be reduced as long as ings if more than one on a lot the taller building adequate light,air and access,sub- ject to approval by planning board,is provided. The Trial Court building and the PFC are on one lot.Although at its narrowest the distance between them will be 25 feet,the distance between them will typically be 48 to 90 feet.There is adequate light,air and access between the two buildings. Floor Area Ratio 3:1 May be increased up to 6:1 for build- ings 50%parking structure or 6:1 for existing buildings. Based on 190,000 GSF for the Trial Court building plus the area of the PFC at 77,646 GSF,the total GSF on the site equals 267,646.After subdivision of the Superior Court and County Commissioners buildings the site will be about 136,500 SF.The floor area ratio for the new Trial Court/Probate&Family Court will be 267,646/136,500=1.96:1 EASEMENTS An easement may be required to replace an existing easement for the storm drain(to be relocated on site)currently serving the connector ramp and North Street.DCAM will follow up on this issue in Schematic Design.An easement will also be required to use the existing service lane when the property line is established between the PFC and the Superior Court building.This easement will be determined at a later date. 30 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 3.11 Topography The Salem Trial Court site is significantly sloped down in a northerly direction from Federal Street to Bridge Street and the buildings on the site generally respond to this condition.The Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building has in effect two different facades—the grand entrance along Federal Street and the more recent glass and concrete addition along Bridge Street.The First Baptist Church building has a solid brick wall with a distinctive band of gold lettering visible from the ramp and Bridge Street side of the building in contrast to the highly articulated entrance portico on the Federal Street Side. Service vehicles enter the site at the lower elevation off Bridge Street.Public pedestrian entries to the buildings are from the Federal Street side. In the area with the most pronounced slope(the highway ramp),the maximum elevation change is approximately 15 feet.The ramp is graded to allow cars to negotiate the grade change down an evenly sloped arc,while the lots with the existing houses are bermed, maintaining a level area for the buildings.The First Baptist Church and the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds are larger buildings with a level that opens to Federal Street and a lower level that opens to Bridge Street.The difference in grade creates distinct edges to the site and the design of the proposed Trial Court building responds to the change in grade as do the existing buildings. 3.12 Utilities Salem Courts Expansion Study, Salem,Massachusetts,Evaluation of Site Utilities,July 2003 by Green International Affiliates,Inc.,is attached to this report in Appendix 1.8.The information below is based on that study. WATER City of Salem municipal water mains exist along the south,east and north sides of the site.The material and age of these distribution mains is unknown. SEWER A City of Salem municipal trunk line runs westerly on Bridge Street along the northern side of the site.It is 12-inch polyethylene slip-lined into an abandoned 60-inch Southern Essex Sanitary District pipe.According to the record plan,the 12-inch sewer line has a slope of 0.006 ft/ft;the full flow capacity is estimated to be approximately 3.5 cubic feet per second. DRAINAGE A City of Salem municipal drain line runs along Bridge Street.This 18 inch line receives the storm water runoff from the site. 31 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site ELECTRICAL Massachusetts Electric supplies electricity to the site.According to record plans there are underground electrical ducts along the south,east and north sides of the site.There are four 4-inch ducts long Bridge Street and nine 3.5-inch and nine 4-inch ducts along Bridge Street.Material and age of the ducts is unknown.There are electrical transformers at the north side of the Superior Court Building and at the west side of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds Building. TELEPHONE According to record plans there are underground telephone ducts,owned and maintained by Verizon,along the south,east and north sides of the site,along Federal, Washington and Bridge Streets respectively. GAS There are gas distribution mains,owned and maintained by Keyspan,at the south, east and north sides of the site.There are high pressure mains along Federal Street and Bridge Street,and low pressure mains along Federal Street,Washington Street and Bridge Street.A gas meter is located at the southeast corner of the Probate and Family Court 1979 addition.There is an abandoned-in-place oil tank in the parking lot to the north of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds. CABLE TV According to record plans,underground cable TV conduit,owned and maintained by Comcast,runs along Federal Street. 3.13 Existing Uses IMPROVING,ADAPTING OR RELOCATING USES The proposed Salem Trial Court site currently has several uses on it that are not part of the court facilities that could either be adapted,improved or relocated to provide area for a modernized court facility.The current highway ramp and internal grassy island occupy more than half and acre of land adjacent to the site.The ramp acts as a poor neighbor to the residential structures and the Baptist Church that turn their backs on this roadway intersection.Elimination of the ramp will create a site large enough to accommodate the new Trial Court building. The First Baptist Church is a historic structure that has a similar civic presence as the court buildings on the site and as such will be relocated to a prominent position at the corner of Federal Street and North Street and will be used for the Law Library. The three residential structures at the end of Federal Street are dwarfed by the highway interchange and feel exposed at the end of Federal Street.These structures would not be compatible for re-use for court functions due to their small scale.Existing uses will be carefully considered throughout this process and all buildings may be retained either on-site or relocated to appropriate sites within the City of Salem. 32 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 3.14 Sustainable Design Considerations Renovation of the existing Probate and Family Court building and any new construction on the Salem Trial Courts site will meet LEED Silver Certification in accordance with DCAM's stated goals to incorporate green building design into all building projects.This is above and beyond Executive Order 12(2006)which requires all new state buildings to meet LEED Plus requirements.Focusing on this goal in the planning feasibility stage of the project will enable green design to be part of an integrated design process. The project has undergone a preliminary review for compliance with LEED criteria.The attached LEED checklist scoring sheet identifies the likely points that will apply,and provides an initial gauge of anticipated cost range and payback period.This review is preliminary and will be refined as schematic design proceeds. Specific potential energy conservation measures are identified and described in Section 3.16. A first-pass analysis indicates that the project can meet 29 of the 33 points required for LEED Silver Certification.Additional points are in the"maybe"category and will be resolved in the design phase. Some LEED credits which appear to be attainable are listed below: The site qualifies as urban land and it is adjacent to major public transportation resources (Sustainable Sites Credit 1 Site Selection and Credit 4 Alternative Transportation).Water savings will be achieved by efficiency measures,native landscaping and stormwater management(Sustainable Sites Credit 6 Stormwater Management;Water Efficiency Credit 1 Water Efficient Landscaping;Credit 3 Water Use Reduction).All buildings will take advantage of the favorable west-east orientation(primary facades along Federal Street facing southward and Bridge Street facing northward)for energy savings(Energy and Atmosphere Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance).Materials used for the renovation and new construction will considered for their recycled content,renewable qualities and low level of emissions(Materials&Resources Credit 4 Recycled Content and Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials;and Indoor Environmental Quality Credit 4 Low-Emitting Materials. In addition,the project will also consider the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs'Sustainable Design Roundtable initiative that has developed green building recommendations for those buildings that are built and/or funded by the Commonwealth, including projects under the jurisdiction of the DCAM.The report was completed and the document published in October 2006 under the title Leading By Example,An Action Plan for Green Buildings in Massachusetts State Building Projects,Final Report of the Massachusetts Sustainable Design Roundtable. 33 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 34 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 3.15 LEED Checklist PAGE 37-43 35 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 36 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site LEED-NC Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back LEED-NC Version 2.2 Project Checklist + E N J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center o 0 Salem,MA � n Goody Clancy 22-Mar-07 U w N QT 2i w o 0 co) Yes ? No 7 6 1 '. Prereq 1 Construction Required • N NA NA Because the site exceeds one Contract Docs to include Activity Pollution acre DCAM will have to apply Erosion and Sedimentation Prevention for a National Pollution Control Plan Discharge Elimination System Permit. 1 Credit 1 Site Selection 1 N NA NA NA DCAM will need to document the site on a Map that will be certified.. 1 Credit 2 Development 1 • Y NA NA This point should be A/E fee for density Density& attainable. MA LEED Plus 1- calculations.Architect will Community point minimum requirement have to document the density Connectivity from SS Credits 2,3,4.1 or of the site development and MR Credit 1.1. the density of the surrounding area. Credit 3 Brownfield 1 • N NA NA Site contaminants may be Contract docucuments to Redevelopment encountered during Site Prep. include site remediation MA LEED Plus 1-point requirements.Remediation minimum requirement from SS scope is unknown;cost Credits 2,3,4.1 or MR Credit cannot be estimtated. 1 Credit 4.1 Alternative 1 • N NA NA Identify commuter rail,bus NA Transportation, lines on map.MA LEED Plus 1 Public point minimum requirement Transportation from SS Credits 2,3,4.1 or Access MR Credit 1.1. 1 Credit 4.2 Alternative 1 N NA NA Need to locate on site. Exterior bike storage in Transportation, Changing rooms included in amended building program. Bicycle Storage& program for occupants Shower and changing Changing Rooms facilities in the program. Credit 4.3 Alternative 1 N NA NA NA Calculations by owner. Transportation, DCAM/AOTC to investigate if Low-Emitting and they want to designate Fuel-Efficient preferred parking for these Vehicles vehicles. Credit 4.4 Alternative 1 N NA NA NA Calculations by owner. Transportation, Operating cost to implement Parking Capacity plan,and loss of revenue due to restricted parking 1 Credit 5.1 Site 1 N NA NA Not feasible NA Development, Protect or Restore Habitat 37 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back + E ai 2 N W o W aa) J a ` (n ? m N W O p Yes ? No Credit 5.2 Site 1 Y $12,000- NA With green roof this may be A/E fee for calculations. Development, $30,000 possible.Green roof will Construction and operational Maximize Open probably be extensive. Check cost premiums for Green roof Space costs for green roof.Check (+/ 2000 sf). maintenance requirements and policy on providing Credit 6.1 Stormwater 1 N NA NA NA This credit is attained by an Design,Quantity underground detention Control structure that mitigates pre and post stormwater flows from the site and would be required by Wetland Regulations and good 1 Credit 6.2 Stormwater 1 N NA NA NA Water quality control is code Design,Quality required regardless of Control whether the project pursues LEED accreditation and therefore its cost is part of the base contract(not an additional cost). 1 Credit 7.1 Heat Island 1 Y $ - NA NA Operating cost premium for Effect,Non-Roof maintenance of shade vegetation and open grid Davina system Credit 7.2 Heat Island 1 Y $25,000 Y A PVC roof or a Thermoplastic A/E fee for calculations. Effect,Roof Olefin(TPO)roof would qualify Construction cost premium for this credit. for roof with SRI>_78 estimated at$0.85/sf x 1 Credit 8 Light Pollution 1 Y NA Y The assumption is that we A/E fee for calculations. Reduction should be able to design both interior and exterior lighting to meet the requirements for this 2 3 '. 1 Credit 1.1 Water Efficient 1 • Y $3000- Y Water Efficient Landscaping, A/E premium to calculate Landscaping, $72,000 Reduce by 50%.Provide drip baseline and reduction. Reduce by 50% irrigation at all planting areas. $3000 construction premium Use native plants requiring for state-of-art water-saving less water. irrigation fixtures;$72,000 construction premium to substitute shrubs/ground cover or native plantings for lawn. 1 Credit 1.2 Water Efficient 1 Y $25,000 N NA $25,000 installation cost for Landscaping,No 25,000 gallon tank used to Potable Use or capture stormwater for No Irrigation irri ation use. 38 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back + E N W E W J - N (n (D a (6 U) �N Cnn N Q C T W O p Yes ? No Credit 2 Innovative 1 Y $30,000- N Innovative Wastewater A/E fee premium to calculate Wastewater 60,000 Technologies. Examine the baseline vs design case,and Technologies use of rainwater for use in low for life cycle cost analysis. flush toilets.Consider costs for Potential construction filtering,holding tanks and premium for additional piping maintenance.Perform a life and equipment.We assumed cycle analysis. that rainwater would be stored in an underground tank.This would require pumps,in addition to filters, chemical treatment,make up water piping and controls.If the rainwater could be stored on an upper floor,the need for pumping could be eliminated. Based on the annual rainfall in Salem and the domestic water usage supplied by DCAM,rainwater could provide 75%of the water used for toilet flushes, however potential operational cost savings would be offset by the cost of energy to run the pumps,water treatment and the relatively low cost of water. 1 Credit 3.1 Water Use 1 . Y NA Y Water Use Reduction,20% A/E fee premium to calculate Reduction,20% Reduction. MA LEED+ baseline vs design case. Reduction Requirement.Consider Potential construction waterless urinals and dual premium for additional piping flush 1.6 gallon waterclosets. and equipment for greywater/stormwater use. The extra cost of waterless urinals may be offset by the elimination of urinal supply piping and flush valves.Operational cost: reduction due to utility savings/increase due to greywater/water system maintenance. Credit 3.2 Water Use 1 Y NA Y Water Use Reduction,30% A/E fee premium to calculate Reduction,30% Reduction.The same fixtures baseline vs design case. Reduction used for Credit 3.1 may meet Potential construction the 30%reduction required for premium for additional piping this point. and equipment for greywater/stormwater use. The extra cost of waterless urinals may be offset by the elimination of urinal supply piping and flush valves.Operational cost: reduction due to utility savings/increase due to greywater/water system maintenance. 39 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back + E N 2 a) W W a) W a) a) (n 4? y a) W O p Yes ? No MUM-11 -17Points Prereq 1 Fundamental Required • N NA NA NA Commissioning is standard Commissioning DCAM practice. of the Building Fnernv Svstems Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Required • N NA NA NA A/E basic Performance services/mandatory. Prereq 3 Fundamental Required • N NA NA NA NA Refrigerant Manaaement Credit 1 Optimize Energy 1 to 10 • Y See Sei Y Per Mass LEED+energy A/E fee premium for Performance report performance to exceed Mass engineering,baseline vs Energy Code requirements by design case calculations and at least 20 percent or meet energy modelling.Due to the requirements for 2-point significant scope of this task, minimum on this credit. this will be an additional A/E Demonstrate 14 percent service despite being a LEED improvement in building +requirement.Potential performance rating compared construction premium for to the baseline equipment(see SEi report). ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1-2004. Potential operational cost Mechanical engineers have reduction due to utility identified 10 HVAC options. savings. See SEi spreadsheet report Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures. Credit 2 On-Site 1 to 3 Y $80,000- Y Achieve 2.5%renewable A/E fee premium for Renewable $775,000 energy. Mechanical engineers research,engineering,and Energy have identified 3 options compliance calculations. (photovoltaic,solar system. Construction premium for microturbines).Potential 3 equipment.Operational cost: credits,assume 1. reduction due to utility savings,additional cost due to equipment Credit 3 Enhanced 1 • N see note Y Requires independent Operational cost reduction Commissioning commissioning authority prior due to utility savings.Cost to to the start of construction Owner of hiring an documents. independent commissioning authority.Potential reduction in construction cost by improved coordination and reduction in change orders. Credit 4 Enhanced 1 Y $ - NA Use no refrigerants or select A/E premium for equipment Refrigerant refrigerants that minimize or research,engineering and Management eliminate emission of specifications.Potential compounds that contribute to marginal construction ozone depletion. premium for equipment. Potential operational premium for equipment 40 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back + E N 2 a) W W a) J Q N (n n a) Q W O U o Yes ? No Credit 5 Measurement& 1 Y $75,000- Y Measurement and verification Construction premium for Verification $125,000 program. additional metering/controls. Operational labor premium to monitor/process data for M&V plan,monitoring may allow operational savings due to efficiency.(This is HVAC Item 10 in the SEi spreadsheet report). 1 Credit 6 Green Power 1 N NA NA Currently not possible for the NA State to purchase green power. 5 4 4 '. Prereq 1 Storage& Required • N NA NA NA NA Collection of Recvclables Credit 1.1 Building Reuse, 1 • N NA NA Reuse of First Baptist Church NA Maintain 75%of unlikely to qualify due to Existing Walls, demolition of rear addition.MA Floors&Roof LEED Plus 1-point minimum requirement from SS Credits 2,3,4.1 or MR Credit 1.1. 1 Credit 1.2 Building Reuse, 1 NA NA NA Rear addition is being NA Maintain 100%of demolished Existing Walls, Floors&Roof 1 Credit 1.3 Building Reuse, 1 NA NA NA Unlikely this requirement could NA Maintain 50%of be met with Church. Interior Non- Structural Elements 1 Credit 2.1 Construction 1 Y $24,000 NA Construction specifications to A/E fee premium for Waste require. calculations and to develop Management, construction waste Divert 50%from management plan. nicnncal Credit 2.2 Construction 1 Y $24,000 NA Requires input from A/E fee premium for Waste Construction Manager for calculations and to develop Management, feasibility and cost. construction waste Divert 75%from management plan. nisnnGal 1 Credit 3.1 Materials Reuse, 1 NA NA NA Not feasible. NA 5% 1 Credit 3.2 Materials 1 NA NA NA Not feasible. NA Reuse,10% 1 Credit 4.1 Recycled 1 Y NA NA Include in specification. A/E fee premium for Content, 10% calculations. (post-consumer+ %pre-consumer) 1 Credit 4.2 Recycled 1 Y $ - NA NA A/E fee premium for Content,20% calculations. (post-consumer+ '/2 pre-consumer) 41 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back + E N 2 a) W W a) o J N O Cn n a) Q C � W O p U Yes ? No 1 Credit 5.1 Regional 1 Y $ NA NA A/E fee premium for Materials, 10% calculations. Extracted, Processed& Manufactured Raninnally 1 Credit 5.2 Regional 1 Y $ NA NA A/E fee premium for Materials,20% calculations. Extracted, Processed& Manufactured Raninnally Credit 6 Rapidly 1 Y $ NA NA A/E fee premium for Renewable calculations. Materials 1 Credit 7 Certified Wood 1 Y $300,000 NA NA A/E fee premium for calculations. Prereq 1 Minimum IAQ Required • N NA NA NA NA Performance Prereq 2 Environmental Required • N NA NA Prohibit smoking in building; Drawings to indicate Tobacco Smoke Smoking areas at least 25' (ETS)Control from building 1 Credit 1 Outdoor Air 1 N NA NA Mechanically ventilated This is in base design. Delivery spaces: Monitor carbon Monitoring dioxide concentrations within all densely occupied spaces. For non-densely occupied spaces provide a direct outdoor airflow measurement 1 Credit 2 Increased 1 N NA NA NA This is in base design.(This Ventilation is HVAC Item 7 in the SEi spreadsheet report Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures). 1 Credit 3.1 Construction 1 N $ - NA NA Specifications to require. IAQ Management Plan, During Cnn zfn irfinn Credit 3.2 Construction 1 N $125,000 NA NA Construction cost premium. IAQ Management Plan,Before nrni i na n ry 1 Credit 4.1 Low-Emitting 1 N $ - NA NA Specifications to require. Materials, Adhesives& Sealants 1 Credit 4.2 Low-Emitting 1 N NA NA NA Specifications to require. Materials,Paints Construction premium of$1 &Coatings per gallon is not a LEED add, because this is a Mass code reauirement. 1 Credit 4.3 Low-Emitting 1 N $ NA NA Specifications to require. Materials,Carpet Svstems 42 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Estimated Cost Pay- Description Notes on Cost back + i N 2 N W E W O J T i (n N CL (0 (n m N Q c T W O p U Yes ? No 1 Credit 4.4 Low-Emitting 1 N $ - NA NA Specifications to require. Materials, Composite Wood &Agrifiber Products Credit 5 Indoor Chemical 1 N $45,000 NA Provide entryway systems to Specifications to require &Pollutant capture dirt and paticulates; entryway systems as base Source Control provide air filtration media with design.Construction MERV 13 or better premium for air filtration media with MERV 13 or 1 Credit 6.1 Controllability of 1 Y $50,000- Y NA A/E fee for calculations. Systems, $250,000 Architect to review/confirm Liahtina design with owner/users. Credit 6.2 Controllability of 1 Y $200,000 NA Individual or group thermal A/E fee for calculations. Systems, comfort control.Consider Architect to review/confirm Thermal Comfort operable windows. design with owner/users. 1 Credit 7.1 Thermal 1 NA NA NA Design HVAC system and This is in base design. Comfort,Design building envelope to meet requirements of ASHRAE Standard 55-2004 Credit 7.2 Thermal 1 NA NA NA Survey occupants within 6 to DCAM/AOTC to establish Comfort, 18 months of occupancy. policy. Verification Credit 8.1 Daylight& 1 Y NA NA While courtrooms and spaces A/E fee for calculations. A Views,Daylight along building perimeter will preliminary analysis indicates 75%of Spaces have daylight,there is a lot of that it may be possible to interior transaction space that meet this requirement.During won't meet this requirement. the design phase modeling, or calculations would be performed(with associated cost)in order to verify the credit. 1 Credit 8.2 Daylight& 1 NA NA NA Views for 90%of Spaces. Not likely Views,Views for 90%of Spaces 1Innovation&D• Points Innovation in Credit 1.1 Design:Provide 1 Specific Title Innovation in Credit 1.2 Design:Provide 1 Specific Title Innovation in Credit 1.3 Design:Provide 1 Specific Title Innovation in Credit 1.4 Design:Provide 1 Specific Title 1 Credit 2 LEED® 1 Accredited Professional WON Points certification estimates) Certified 26-32 points Silver 33-38 points Gold 39-51 points Platinum 52-69 points 43 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 44 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 3.16 Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures PAGE 47-48 45 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site 46 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Simple Energy Conservation Incremental Cost Available Payback Measures Energy Conservation Measure Range Incentives Range Comments Category ($) (years) 1)High Performance Glazing $150,000 to$300,000 Unlikely 10 to 15 years Triple pane glazing with U- Building Envelope value<0.3 2)Improved Wall and Roof $50,000 to$100,000 Unlikely 12 to 16 years Insulation at least 25-30% better than code Centrifugal Chillers meeting 1)Energy Efficient Chillers $150,000 to$200,000 Yes 5 to 7 years the minimum requirements of National Grid prescriptive HVAC incentive criteria. Contingent on incentives by 2)Gas Fired Chiller $50,000 to$100,000 Likely 7 to 9 years KeySpan and availability of natural gas. Incentives provided by 3)Variable Frequency Drives on $30,000 to$50,000 Yes 3 to 5 years National Grid for variable pumping systems frequency drives on chilled water and hot water pumps. Incentives provided by 4)Variable Frequency Drives on $50,000 to$75,000 Yes 3 to 5 years National Grid for variable Air Handling Units frequency drives on air handling units. Incentives provided by 5)Geothermal Systems Open National Grid. Feasibility of Loop $350,000 to 450,000 Yes 7 to 10 years geothermal system dependent on soil mechanics and water table. 6)Condensing Boilers(High $175,000 to$225,000 Yes 7 to 10 years Some prescriptive incentives Efficiency) available by KeySpan. 7)Dedicated Outside Air System $150,000 to$200,000 No 3 to 5 years Included in base building design. 47 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 3 Documentation of Project Site Simple Energy Conservation Incremental Cost Available Payback Measures Energy Conservation Measure Range Incentives Range Comments Category $ ears 8)Enthalpy Wheel $ 125,000 to$ 175,000 Likely 7 to 10 years Custom Incentives provided by KeySpan. Prescriptive/Custom 9)Demand Control Ventilation $50,000 to$75,000 Yes 3 to 5 years Incentives available by National Grid.Assumed CO2 sensors in courtroom area and conference rooms. 10)Enhanced Building Incremental cost depends on Automation System $75,000 to$ 125,000 Yes 5 to 7 years number of points controlled by BAS system. 1)Energy Efficient Lighting Incentives available by Lighting Systems System $75,000 to$ 100,000 Yes 4 to 6 years National Grid. 2)Lighting Control System- Occupancy Sensors $50,000 to$75,000 Yes 4 to 6 years Assumed 1 sensor/1000 ft2 3)Lighting Control System- Assumed daylight control for Daylight Sensors $50,000 to$75,000 Yes 4 to 6 years the perimeter and the light well area. Incentives available by 1)Photo Voltaic Array $80,000 to$ 100,000 Yes 8 to 10 years Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. 10 kW PV Renewable Energy array assumed. Incentives available by 2)Microturbine $300,000 to$500,000 Yes 10 to 15 years Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. 100 kW microturbine assumed. Incentives available by 3)Wind Turbine $ 125,000 to$ 175,000 Yes 8 to 10 years Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. 10 kW wind turbine assumed. 48 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 7 W lil This chapter provides DCAM and AOTC building,site design and technical standards followed by Designer's statements of how those goals are met in the conceptual design for the Salem Trial Court. The sections are organized as follows: 4.1 Building Design Concept Principles:AOTC/DCAM 49 4.2 Building Design Concept Principles:Designer's Response 56 4.3 Site Design Concept Principles:AOTC/DCAM 59 4.4 Site Design Concept Principles: Designer's Response 64 4.5 Building Systems Standards:AOTC/DCAM 65 4.6 Building Systems Standards: Designer's Response 88 4.1 Building Design Concept Principles: AOTC/DCAM Following is DCAM's statement of courthouse building design concept principles, organized as follows: A Optimum Blocking and Stacking of Program Elements 50 B Circulation 51 C Building Entry Sequence 53 D Building Security 54 E Exterior Spaces 54 F Wayfinding in Public Areas 55 G Multi-Height Spaces 55 H Future Changes 55 49 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements A OPTIMUM BLOCKING AND STACKING OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS (Designer's response on page 56) 1 Vertical order of functions Maximum efficiency in courthouse design can be achieved by grouping similar program functions together.The typical modern courthouse is organized with detainee areas on the lowest level(basement),transaction offices on the main floor(and the second floor,as needed),and the courtrooms located above.The Judicial Suites may be located on a dedicated floor above the courtroom floors or in a separate area on courtroom floors. The following functions are considered to be high traffic: Transaction counters for Clerks'offices and Probation offices • Arraignment courtrooms Locating high traffic functions on lower floors provides the following benefits: • Ease of wayfinding • Service provision efficiency • Economy of elevator use • Control and security 2 Separation of court and non-court functions Non-court functions are those operations which may be located in the courthouse but which are not under the control of the Administrative Office of the Trial Court.The presence of these operations is beneficial to the courts as the services they provide are immediately available to the courts'users.This availability often reduces the need for court activity,as problems may be resolved immediately through the efforts of mediators,or referrals can be made to other agencies which have programs that address a persons needs more appropriately than the court system. All non-court functions are accessible from the public circulation path only. There is no connection to the court staff circulation from these offices.All non- court personnel are typically restricted from using court staff circulation except in the same manner as the public,through monitored control points.This restriction preserves the confidentiality of court activities and records which are not for public examination. Non-court functions include the following: • District Attorney's office • Court Clinic 50 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Alternative Dispute Resolution • Child Care (if provided for in program) • Department of Revenue Separation of court and non-court functions provides the following benefits: • Separation of public and staff circulation • Offices can be easily found without traversing the courthouse • Offices can be operated and accessed during non-court hours 3 Plan courtroom sets in pairs Modern courthouse design organizes courtroom sets in pairs with a shared core composed of a secure elevator and holding cells. This efficient pairing provides the following benefits: • Courtrooms share a secure core with holding cells and a secure elevator • Courtroom pairs on multiple floors can be served by the same core • Complete separation of detainee,staff and public circulation • Courtroom waiting can be shared • Efficient access to public,staff and secure circulation B CIRCULATION (Designer's response on page 57) Clarity and simplicity of circulation systems is an essential quality of courthouse design that supports public access,productivity of staff,and security for all users.The Courthouse is organized around three separate circulation systems to provide convenience and safety for the public and staff: 1 Public Circulation for use by the general public; 2 Staff Circulation for use by the courthouse staff including judges;and 3 Secure Circulation for the transfer of persons in custody,under Court Officer escort. These circulation systems are to remain separate throughout the facility.There are specific,limited and controlled locations to change from one circulation system to another. In some localized conditions a member of the public may be allowed into staff circulation,but only while under direct escort by court staff. Each circulation system has specific requirements. 1 Public Circulation • is used by the general public to gain access to all of the courthouse's public areas,such as the Transaction Offices and Courtrooms,as well as non-court functions 51 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements such as District Attorney offices,Court Clinic,and Child Care Center(if provided). includes the main entry,building lobby,courtroom waiting areas,jury assembly room,specified conference rooms,restrooms and telephone areas as well as all public stairways,escalators and elevators. must be logical and simple to navigate for all users,especially first time users,regardless of their destination within the building. Stairways and elevators must be located to make travel between floors easy and efficient. • must serve repetitive elements such as meeting spaces,restrooms,and emergency egress stairs in a consistent pattern to help users find these elements. • connects to Staff circulation only at specific control points where electronic admission or staff escort is required. 2 Staff Circulation is used by court staff only.Non-court personnel,such as clinicians,social service providers,District Attorney staff and attorneys are not permitted to use this circulation without escort. • includes separate elevators,stairways and restrooms for staff only • includes corridors separate from the public for court staff to move between departments and courtroom areas in a private"back of house"manner. • allows staff to circulate without risk of uncontrolled encounters with hostile or upset members of the public • allows a measure of security and privacy for the storage of sensitive files and confidential matters • provides an"Employees Only"area where staff may work,meet or take rest or lunch breaks without being disturbed. • connects with public circulation only at secure doors equipped with card readers. Staff circulation includes two distinct types of circulation. In the transaction offices,staff circulation is the office area and circulation behind the public counters.This circulation connects the dif ferent departments,such as the Probation Offices and Clerk's Office in each separate court department.On the Courtroom floors staff circulation refers to more private corridors which allow the Judge and Court Staff to reach the Courtroom and jury deliberation rooms without crossing the public circulation. It also provides separate circulation for jurors from the jury pool to courtrooms and from courtrooms to jury deliberation rooms.This corridor can be reached from the Judiciary offices and all staff areas. See the Functional Adjacency Diagrams for more details. 52 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 3 Secure Circulation • is used to move detainees throughout the building; • is restricted to Court Officers and authorized personnel such as Probation officers and certain law enforcement officials; • includes dedicated elevators for moving detainees from the Central Holding Area to Courtroom holding areas and separate detainee circulation behind the courtrooms; • has the highest degree of security to control detainee movement and to minimize the risk of escape,transfer of contraband and other inappropriate activities;and • security is reinforced in secure corridors with the use of electronic locks on doors,surveillance cameras in corridors,and use of personal communication devices. C BUILDING ENTRY SEQUENCE (Designer's response on page 57) For security reasons,the court requires four separate secure entrances: 1 Covered public entrance with a security station,also used by staff, 2 Detainee entrance via a secure driveway through the sallyport. 3 Entry for judges from secure parking. 4 Service entry for deliveries. Note: judges and deliveries may share the service entry. The Main Public Entrance is the single entrypoint to the courthouse for all public visitors.All staff members will also use the main entrance,with the exception of those using secure parking within the building. It must be located and expressed formally so that it can be easily identified and found from the street without depending on signage.The main entrance to the building should include a covered exterior area that accommodates and protects from the weather the many activities that occur just outside the entry doors,including queueing up for security,waiting for rides,smoking,taking a break and making phone calls. The Secure Detainee entrance and vehicular sallyport lead directly to the central detention area. In order to achieve the desired separation of public,staff and detainees,this entrance is typically located away from the main entrance of the building.The detainee entrance must also be physically and visually separated from the judges'and delivery entrances.For additional information and further details regarding the detainee entrance and sallyport,please refer to the sallyport room data sheet. 53 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Judges are provided parking spaces and an entry in a secure location separate from public parking.The judges'entry shall be physically and visually separated from the public and detainee entrances. The service entry is used for the delivery of large items such as bulk supply orders, equipment,etc.,unlike small package and U.S. Mail deliveries,which arrive through the main public entrance.The service entry,is typically located out of sight of the public entry and typically contains a loading dock. D BUILDING SECURITY (See further discussion in section 4.5, C.18 on page 83 and Designer's response on page 59) Building security systems should incorporate the following: 1 Access Control System 2 CCTV System • Public areas All detainee areas • Secure court space (parking areas) • Building perimeter doors • Access control doors Elevators 3 Duress Alarm • Courtrooms (Judge and Clerk bench) • Offices (Judges, Department heads) Public counters 4 Intercom System • Lockup entry/exit Miscellaneous doors E EXTERIOR SPACES (Designer's response on page 58) The design should provide the following: • A visible public entrance that can be identified from a distance. • Weather protection for smoking,phone calls and waiting for rides. • An area for vehicular drop-off within close proximity to the main entry. • A step-free pathway from sidewalk to entrance. • A civic plaza with street amenities that provide security. Note:This information is provided as a summary of site considerations that may affect conceptual layout as well as blocking and stacking of the building. For complete information on site requirements,refer to 4.3, Site Design Concept Principles. 54 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements F WAYFINDING IN PUBLIC AREAS (Designer's response on page 58) In order to facilitate navigation through the building for all users,the design should: • Use clear building layout and interior and exterior landmarks to orient users. • Locate elevators and open public stairs together for a single choice point. • Centralize vertical circulation in plan to minimize travel distances for staff. • Cluster public amenities such as waiting,telephones,and restrooms. G MULTI-HEIGHT SPACES (Designer's response on page 58) The design of atrium space in comprehensive justice centers is controversial and complex.The benefits and problems need to be carefully considered when evaluating atrium spaces within court buildings. In addition to providing a public space,an atrium may serve as an orienting element for visitors to the courthouse.Atria are often used to bring daylight into the building interior,which is a desirable feature.However,there are also several drawbacks to using atrium spaces in courthouses.Large,multi-height public spaces can create acoustical issues for visitors,especially in courthouses where there may be many people waiting.There are safety risks associated with atrium spaces as well. In existing courthouses,distressed litigants have attempted to jump over atrium railings and fighting youths have tried to push one another over. Atrium spaces can also increase HVAC operating costs and present maintenance challenges for window cleaning and relamping of light fixtures,and expensive smoke evacuation systems per code depending on the number of floors. In terns of the functional needs of the court,atrium spaces often occupy prime square footage, which may be better utilized by optimizing the useable floor space within the building. H FUTURE CHANGE IN COURTHOUSES (Designer's response on page 58) As stated in the DCAM Goals,flexibility and efficiency are important to consider when designing court buildings.Court functions may change over time and non-court functions may eventually move out to allow for court space expansion.The design of a comprehensive justice center can accommodate future changes through the following strategies: • Locate administrative departments in contiguous space for expansion and contraction of space needs. 55 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Provide courtroom bay size and ceiling height in additional spaces for future courtroom needs. Provide cabling capacity for a fully electronic courthouse. 4.2 Building Design Concept Principles: Designer's Response This section provides the designer's narrative of the Salem Trial Court building design concept principles,organized as follows: A Optimum Blocking and Stacking of Program Elements 56 B Non-Court Functions 56 C Circulation 57 D Building Entrances 57 E Exterior Public Spaces 58 F Wayfinding in Public Areas 58 G Mulit-Height Spaces 58 H Adaptability 58 I Security 59 A OPTIMUM BLOCKING AND STACKING OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS The concept design proposed for the Salem Trial Court is based on maximum efficiency in vertical stacking:detainee areas are on the lowest level(as is service),the heaviest traffic transaction offices (for District Court)are on the main floor,with Superior transaction offices directly above and courtrooms stacked above that.All courtroom sets are in pairs with the only exception the heavy traffic District Arraignment Court which is on the main floor. The Judicial Suites are typically behind their courtrooms on each floor,making for efficient stacking.The Juvenile transaction areas and courtrooms are in a separate wing,entered just after the security zone. The courtrooms are in pairs,around a shared core with secure elevator and holding cells.They are stacked above each other so that multiple floors are served by the same core. B NON-COURT FUNCTIONS These functions (the District Attorney,Attorney's room,interpreter's office and court clinic)are all easily accessible from public circulation paths and are not connected to staff circulation. The Law Library is housed in an historic church,connected to the main public circulation route by an enclosed pedestrian link,secured by a card reader-equipped door. 56 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements C CIRCULATION The proposed Salem Trial Court has three distinct and separate circulation systems: • Public circulation is a broad,daylit corridor on each floor that gives access to all areas open to the public. It is a simple and logical system:a broad corridor,with room for seating and waiting—easy for the public to navigate and security personnel to survey. It is repetitive on all floors,to simplify orientation with open stairs and elevators at the center to make travel between floor easy and efficient. It is easy for orientation and easy for security. • Staff circulation is typically behind the courtrooms with its own elevators and stairs (connecting to secure parking). It is used by court staff only and allows movement between departments and courtrooms without intersecting with the public circulation. Staff can circulate without risk and confidential or sensitive files are secure and private. Employees-only areas such as break rooms and staff toilets are reached by this circulation system,which connects with public circulation at only one secure card reader-equipped door.The Jury Pool also has access to the secure circulation system for jurors to reach courtrooms and jury deliberation rooms. • Secure Circulation begins at the Central Holding Area where detainees enter and includes dedicated corridors and elevators that bring them to all courtrooms. It is a self-contained system that does not intersect with any of the other circulation systems and is used only by detainees and court officers or other authorized personnel. D BUILDING ENTRANCES There are four distinct points of entry to the Salem Judicial Center. • The Main Public Entrance is on Federal Street and is used by the public and the staff(with the exception of those staff members who have secure parking on the Bridge Street side)and will enter via the staff stairs and elevators directly into the staff circulation system. This entry is housed in a"pavilion'with a covered portico that provides protection for outdoor activities and signals the formal entry to the courthouse by its design. It is related in scale and character to the adjacent,historic Probate and Family Courthouse but is accessible at grade. 57 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • The Sallyport provides a secure entrance for detainees and leads directly to the central detention area. It is reached via a curb cut on Bridge Street,a floor below the public entry on Federal Street. • The Judges' Entry is via their secure parking area off Bridge Street and is visually and physically separate from the detainees'entry. • The Service Entry is also accessed via Bridge Street and includes a loading dock with space for a 40'maximum truck and a dumpster. E EXTERIOR PUBLIC SPACES The Salem Judicial Center has a visible entry portico that can be seen when approaching from either end of Federal Street and also provides covered space for those waiting outside for rides with a vehicular drop-off nearby. The entry is at grade,accessible for those with mobility impairments.A paved area with a low seating wall links the portico with the Law Library/Church and provides a civic plaza that is separated from the rest of the building by a planted area to provide security. F WAYFINDING IN PUBLIC AREAS The public path from the point of entry is simple and direct: Security screening takes place directly off the entry and leads to the broad cross corridor/waiting area that gives access to all public spaces. Elevators and stairs are at the midpoint of this corridor,close to the point of entry and near restrooms. Signage will be employed as required to reinforce the logic of the building and to guide users to specific destinations. G MULTI-HEIGHT SPACES The Salem Judicial Center has no atrium. Its broad public corridors,stacked above each other and glazed along their full length and at the ends,provide daylight and orientation to the public circulation.A two-story lobby in the pavilion gives dignity to the entry sequence. H ADAPTABILITY Future change is anticipated by grouping by function:Transaction areas can grow and shrink as they are adjacent to each other.Courtrooms are located and designed to allow their use by other court departments than those now programmed to be in them. 58 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements I SECURITY All aspects of security have been give careful consideration in the design of the Salem Judicial Center including: 1 Site Security&Building Entrances • The location of the building on the site is set back from surrounding streets to the extent possible and low walls and bollards are planned for key locations where unauthorized vehicles might try to approach. • Landscaping is planned to enhance the building so as not to obstruct sightlines or provide hiding places. Good sight lighting will further discourage intrusion into the site and support operation of CCTV cameras. • There are two curb cuts off Bridge Street:One to secure Judges'parking, accessible only by electronic cards and one to the service and sally port areas. There is no public parking on the site.The public pedestrian entry(on Federal Street)is via a security station that includes magnetometers for metal detection and x-ray equipment for packages. 2 Building Security • After passing through the security station the public enters a broad straight corridor where security personnel have direct views of all activities. • Access for the public to the staff corridors is limited to one,electronically controlled point of access for the limited occasions when it is desired. • Secure circulation for detainees is completely separate and never crosses 4.3 other circulation. Site Design Concept Principles: AOTC/DCAM Following is DCAM's statement of courthouse site design concept principles,organized as follows: A Site Lighting 59 B Site Improvements 60 C Site Drainage,Vegetation, Surface Materials 60 D Wetlands 61 E Utilities 61 F Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation 62 G Parking Requirements 63 H Service Area 63 I Site Security 63 A SITE LIGHTING • Site lighting design should ensure pedestrian safety around the perimeter of the site,within the parking areas and along any proposed pedestrian walks. 59 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Lighting along City streets shall he a continuation of existing street lighting meeting the requirements of the SalemPublic Works Department. • Site lights shall be vandal,resistant,located out of the way of snow plows and other vehicles. Provide concrete footing/bases flush with finish grades. Place wiring between poles near the back of curbs so as not to interfere with proposed plantings. • Consider the use of photo-voltaic energy as the power source for site lighting. B SITE IMPROVEMENTS (Designer's response on page 64) Durable,high quality site improvements should be provided to enhance the overall site design concept and uses of the site.Amenities may include benches;bicycle racks;trash receptacles;ash urns;site lights for streets,drives/parking and pedestrian areas;tree grates for trees in pavement;bollards;seat walls and retaining walls;flagpoles;sculptures or other art work;signs;and fences.The information below provides general considerations for site improvements. For detailed information,refer to the specifications. • Locate trash receptacles at convenient locations for both pedestrian use and for trash collection:along pedestrian routes and near building entries. Specification and placement of trash receptacles should be coordinated with AOTC security specialists. • Bicycle racks should be located near building entry. • The site design should consider the presence of smokers and the courts'desire to dissuade them from congregating at the front entry. The following is a minimum list of site furnishings that shall be provided as part of the Main entry area: Bicycle rack,trash receptacle,ash urn,benches or seating wall,lighting,flagpoles. Additional items may be provided,subject to DCAM and AOTC approval. C SITE DRAINAGE,VEGETATION,SURFACE MATERIALS • Design pedestrian and parking areas to minimize the use of snow and ice removal methods that consume large amounts of energy and release chemical pollutants. • Wherever possible,utilize porous pavement,vegetated filter strips,grassy swales, filtration basins or other methods to minimize,capture and treat stormwater run-off. • Excessive paving also contributes to heat build-up on the site so increase shade and provide cooling from evapo-transpiration by using a high percentage of 60 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements landscape coverage. Highly(reflective) materials also minimizes heat build-up so those should be used on-site wherever possible. • The landscape design should be as much of a self-contained ecosystem as possible.One possibility for irrigation can be the gravitational flow from storm water retention cisterns. • Utilize planting species and varieties that are native to the local ecosystem. • Utilize native plants to help in pest control and minimize the use of toxic chemicals. • Exterior hose bibbs shall be provided at convenient locations to facilitate maintenance without placement of hoses over pedestrian or vehicular pavements. Provide sleeving under pavements and through site structures between all isolated plant beds to accommodate irrigation system.(Walkway material to be determined in Schematic Design.) • Use of deciduous tress for shading of building The pedestrian route shall be lined with site improvements and,where possible, shade trees,flowering trees,low shrubs (three foot maximum height)and hardy perennials and bulbs. Flowering trees may be provided at pedestrian gathering areas.Tree plantings shall be enhanced with lawn,low-growing evergreen and deciduous shrubs (three feet maximum height);spring bulbs,hardy perennials (such as low everblooming daylilies) and groundcovers.All lawns and planted areas will be irrigated. D WETLANDS A 100 year Flood Zone is tangential to the southern border of the site.No wetland issues exist for this site. E UTILITIES Results of Limited Subsurface Investigation, Salem Department of Public Works, North Road and Bridge Street Interchange, Salem,Massachusetts, February 20,2003 is attached as Appendix A1.7. Salem Courts Expansion Study, Salem,Massachusetts, Evaluation of Site Utilities,Green International Affiliates,Inc.,July 2003 is attached as Appendix A1.8. Design team is responsible for confirming all survey information provided and coordinating with all state and local requirements. 61 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements F PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION (Designer's response on page 64) The site should provide a major barrier-free civic pedestrian way from the existing city sidewalks to the Trial Court on Federal Street.The vehicle dropoff will be on an accessible route. Sidewalks provided on site shall be a minimum of 10'wide(not including bench setbacks) and 80"clear to the lowest overhead tree branches to permit visual surveillance through the space and physical access by security vehicles. Provide curb cuts and thickened reinforced pavement to accommodate vehicle loads. Provide lockable removable bollards at the site edge along Federal Street. Pedestrian access to the site should be well lit and include landscaping such as deciduous shade trees,flowering trees,low shrubs or lawn.The plantings must not screen eye-level views through the space.The walkway pavement must accommodate emergency vehicle access and snow removal equipment. The site design must include a vehicular drop-off area near the building entrance; this access should be coordinated with the recently completed handicapped ramp serving the adjacent Probate and Family Court buildingThe drop-off should be combined with a pedestrian gathering space,which is provided with benches,trash receptacles,and additional plantings.Additional pedestrian gathering spaces along the walk may also be provided.The entry plaza may include seat and planter walls which relate to the design and materials of the Trial Court building.The layout of walkways,seating and landscaping should respect existing and proposed pedestrian movements. Vehicular access to the site will be limited to service,staff and detention vehicles. Where vehicular access occurs,two-way,entry/exit,curb cuts into the site from adjacent streets shall be a minimum of 24'wide. Provide adequate radii,slopes and sight-line clearance for single-unit truck and emergency vehicle maneuverability. Provide for emergency/security/maintenance vehicle access to linear walkways where they are separated from the vehicular pavement. FIRE LANES Fire lanes shall be established near the proposed facility in accordance with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be located to be easily accessible,but as inconspicuous to pedestrians as possible. SALLYPORT Vehicles with detainees will enter directly into a controlled sallyport, which must be entirely separated from public, service and staff vehicular and pedestrian circulation.Vehicular access to the sallyport should not have a view of the secure`Authorized Only"parking area so that detainees do not have opportunity to 62 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements see judges entering and exiting the court facility. For additional information regarding the sallyport,refer to the room data sheets located in the Building Program Section of this document. G PARKING REQUIREMENTS (Designer's response on page 64) The only parking being provided for as part of this project is that for specific staff noted below.There will be no public parking developed on site. The program is expected to accommodate a total of 19 parking spaces which will provide secure parking for 11 judges,4 Clerk Magistrates and 4 Chief Probation Officers.Additional parking for the public,jury and staff can be accommodated nearby by means of on and off-street parking. Secure access and control for judges' parking shall be provided by a barrier,attractive fencing(relating the the design of the facility)and card-key access. Standard parking space dimensions shall meet the guidelines required by the Massachusetts State Building Code as well as those of the MAAB and the ADAAG. Of the total 19 non-public parking spaces,provide one"van accessible" space and access aisle. Pavement marking and signage shall be provided for traffic and parking guidance, identification of accessible or reserved parking areas,pedestrian drop-off areas and for clearly marking pedestrian crosswalks. H SERVICE AREAS (Designer's response on page 64 and page 102) A secure method/sequence shall be provided for large deliveries and trash removal. This service area should be in an inconspicuous location convenient for truck circulation and loading. Provide loading dock space for a minimum of one truck, with either a 4'high loading platform or a lift device to facilitate truck loading. Provide screened and separated areas for exterior dumpsters,transformers or other equipment. Service areas need to provide for storage of items such as snowblowers, shovels,salt,weed trimmers or sand in close proximity to parking lots and walkways. I SITE SECURITY (Designer's response on page 64) The entire building perimeter and overview of the parking area shall be CCTV- monitored.Above-ground utility structures should be located for convenient service 63 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements access but away from pedestrian circulation areas. Provide screened secure enclosures with low maintenance pads.. Staff will arrive from nearby parking areas and during normal business hours the 4.4 staff will enter through the public main entrance. Judges will enter the building through the secure staff-only entrance during normal business hours. Site Design Concept Principles: Designer's Response A THE BUILDING IS SITED AND DESIGNED IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES: • That wayfinding for the public is clear without signage:a major entry(with portico) on Federal Street signals the point of entry. • That drop-off and pick-up for the public is near the entry and provides a covered place to wait under the portico on Federal Street. • That the pedestrians with and without mobility impairment can move into the building at grade,without steps in a direct and dignified manner:under the portico to a single,large entry. • That service areas are distant from the public entry and hidden from view:a service entry and loading dock are a full level below the public entry and on the opposite side of the building off Bridge Street. • That the site is easily surveilled and difficult to penetrate other than at designated points:open landscaped areas with limited public access provide a visual amenity but are a buffer. • That staff parking be secure and lead directly to the staff circulation system: parking for 19 vehicles is off Bridge Street is behind a security fence and leads directly to staff elevators and stairs. B SITE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Site Improvements include both hard and soft scape and respond to the various conditions on different sides of the building: • On Federal Street(to the south)there are a series of paved areas that(going from east to west) • provide the at grade transition from sidewalk to building entry,under the portico. • create a small public plaza with a row of deciduous trees(for summer shade)and a seating wall. provide a paved forecourt to the Church/Law Library that responds to its original setting and broad steps. • Behind the public plaza,low planting(both evergreen and deciduous) and a lawn create a green oasis,visible from the public circulation within and the street. High branching trees line two sides of this space. 64 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • On the North Street(west) side of the Judicial Center careful grading and a retaining wall allow lawn and(where steeper) deciduous shrubs to come up to the sidewalk. • On Bridge Street(north of the building) a row of high branching deciduous trees, set in a narrow lawn,follow the street line and,in conjunction with evergreen planting,help screen the fence around the secure parking and service area. • Between the new building and the Probate and Family Court(to the east),there is a paved service court and,beyond that,a small garden to enhance the view from the Grand Jury Suite. 4.5 Building Systems Standards: AOTC/DCAM This section is intended to address building systems from several perspectives: • Aspects of the user agency's operations that may influence the design of building systems. • Specific demands the users place on the building that may have technical implications • Unique site and locational issues that may need to be addressed in the design of systems • Overview of technical performance expected by DCAM and AOTC based on the agencies'experience constructing and maintaining many courthouses. This information is general and qualitative.Technical standards are described in the Specifications.Outline of this section is as follows: A Infrastructure 1 Foundations and Basement Construction 66 2 Structural—including compliance with Chapter 17 of MSBC 66 B Exterior Envelope 1 Roof Construction 67 2 Exterior Walls 67 3 Exterior Windows 68 4 Exterior Doors 68 C Interior Construction 1 Partitions and Wall Finishes 69 2 Interior Doors 69 3 Floor Finishes 70 4 Ceiling Finishes 70 5 Specialties 71 6 Staircases 71 7 Atriums and Balconies 71 8 Interior Air Quality 72 9 Conveying Systems 72 65 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 10 Plumbing 73 11 Energy Usage and Conservation 74 12 HVAC 74 13 Fire Protection including Smoke Evacuation and CO Evacuation systems as appropriate. 78 14 Electrical 78 15 Lighting and Branch Wiring 80 16 Sound System and Audio/Visual Recommendations for Courtrooms 81 17 Acoustics 82 18 Security 83 19 Waste Management 87 A INFRASTRUCTURE 1 Foundations and Basement Construction (Designer's response on page 88) The site slopes down from Federal Street to Bridge Street approximately 15 feet. The lower level opens on grade with Bridge Street and the first floor above,opens on grade with Federal Street.As the lower level extends back into the site towards Federal Street it becomes a basement level fully below grade.A portion of this level is expected to be a few feet into the water table,so it will be necessary to waterproof the floor slab and design it to resist uplift. 2 Structural (Designer's response on page 89) The typical courtroom floor consisting of two court sets separated by a open green-roof/light well will set the structural bay size.Courtrooms require a clear span of 40 feet across the width for a column free space. The shared detainee area between the two courtrooms of a court set requires a width of about 20 feet. All court transaction spaces occur on floors below the courtroom floors,and the courtroom floor structural grid will carry down though these floors.Where active record storage occurs on these floors the structural bay size will be reduced to accommodate the increase loading of dense compact filing systems and the floor slab design will be strengthened. Programmatic performance • Plan for extra floor loads at each transaction office for high density records storage 66 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements System performance Design structural system to provide necessary large spans for courtrooms and parking,if within the building. B EXTERIOR ENVELOPE 1 Roof Construction (Designer's response on page 90) Programmatic performance • The roof design shall minimize wear and tear from traffic by coordinating the location of rooftop equipment with access points.If the building design includes a mechanical penthouse,provide watertight access and walkway pads. • Materials that are exposed to view from the ground,even at a distance, shall be copper,terne,slate,or similar materials. The roof must be accessed by stairs (not ladder). • Determine what devices,if any,are required on the roof for the window washing equipment. • If mechanical equipment is located on the roof,a penthouse is required. Its design shall address the following: • not be visible from the ground. • be a tempered but not fully conditioned space. Provide sufficient sound and vibration isolation to prevent excessive noise to upper levels of courthouse as well as to adjacent properties. • be designed consistent with the building aesthetic and expressed as an architectural element such as a dormer,sloped roof,or tower rather than a mechanical box. • if constructed of lighter materials than the rest of the building,the materials will the same life expectancy as the rest of the building. System performance • Roofing membrane shall be warranted for 20 years minimum. • The roof system shall be SBS (S tyrene-Butadiene-Styrene). • The R-value shall meet the overall building thermal loss as required by the energy code. Technical performance • A flat roof of no less than 1/4 inch per foot slope is required. ,All roofs shall be pitched to drain. 67 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 2 Exterior Walls (Designer's response on page 90) Programmatic performance • Exterior wall configuration,especially where the roof may project beyond the exterior wall,must take into account how windows will be washed. System performance • The exterior cladding of the building will be masonry or precast construction. • Select color and finish,and use accent materials with respect to the surrounding visual context and considering the long term appearance of the building with minimal upkeep. Technical performance Minimize projections on the exterior walls that will become pigeon roosts. • The selected material must have a proven technique for graffti removal. • Specification of exterior wall materials and anchorage systems shall take into account proximity to a salt air environment. 3 Exterior Windows (Designer's response on page 90) Programmatic performance To provide optimal indoor air quality and comfort for occupants,use operable windows in select areas wherever possible. It is not necessary to open the windows all the way. In some areas of the courthouse,windows are undesirable for safety/ security reasons. Such spaces include all detainee areas (including corridors) and directly the area around the judge's bench in the courtroom. • No windows in courtrooms and jury deliberation rooms should be located where the public can look into the space from the outside. • The design and location of windows must ensure ease and minimal cost of window washing,both exterior and interior.Coordinate with operations to determine optimal maintenance plan. Exterior and internal windowashing equipment must meet OSHA requirements. • Any windows located where the sun will shine into the public spaces during the day must address glare control. System performance • The windows shall meet the highest industry standards for energy efficiency. Technical performance • Windows shall be specified to be non-corrosive in the salt air environment of Salem. 68 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 4 Exterior Doors Programmatic performance Provide the highest quality,easily maintained automatic sensor door openers at all public doors. If public entry doors are designated as entrance and exit,be sure the entrance is on the right from the exterior.Coordinate with the location and layout of interior security. • Design exterior egress-only doors so that they do not look like entrance doors. • Do not recess egress-only doors in alcoves where the public can loiter. • Select doors that have visual clarity regarding which side of the door is operable. • No offset hinge doors are permitted. • The opening force required for exterior doors exceeds what many users can push.At least one door at the public entrance must open automatically, either with a sensor or a button/plate. System performance • All exterior doors will be alarmed. See security section for specific information. • Egress doors must be in compliance with ADA and MAAB requirements. Technical performance • Any exterior automatic doors with push plates or buttons must be operable with a maximum of 15 lbs pressure. C INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION 1 Partitions and Wall Finishes Programmatic performance • Install wainscoting below drywall in public areas where people are apt to lean against walls. • Install chair rails on the walls of all meeting rooms unless wainscoting is provided. Technical performance • All walls that are required to provide acoustical privacy must extend to the underside of the floor above. 2 Interior Doors Programmatic performance • Locate all doors so they have sufficient maneuvering space inside and outside to be accessible.Automatic door openers on interior doors may not be substituted for maneuvering space in new construction. • All interior doors on closers must be operable with 5 lbs.of pressure. 69 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 3 Floor Finishes Programmatic performance All floor surfaces must be slip resistant,especially when wet. • Minimize the number of floor materials that require unique cleaning protocols and cleaning equipment. Provide sufficient walk-off surfaces at all entrances to minimize sand and salt in the building during the winter. • Provide a walk-off surface in the public entrance weather vestibule that can be easily removed and cleaned and complies with accessibility requirements for level changes no greater than 1/4 inch. 4 Ceiling Finishes Courthouse ceiling materials/finishes will vary depending room/space function. Common attributes to all ceiling materials will be durability and low maintenance. Some areas will have articulated,decorative ceilings and other areas will be primarily functional. a Courtrooms will have the highest quality ceilings consisting of veneer plaster on gypsum lath forming coffers,coves and dropped soffits. Some areas where sound absorption may be desirable will receive acoustic tile with concealed spline suspension system. b Courtroom vestibule ceilings will be veneer plaster on gypsum lath or ACT with concealed spline suspension system. c Justice's offices,conference rooms and executive offices will have ACT with concealed spline suspension system. d Office pools,offices,file rooms,storage and equipment rooms will have 2'x 2'ACT. Large areas may be articulated with dropped soffits. e Public lobbies,circulation and waiting areas will have ACT or linear metal slats/panels. Large areas may be articulated with dropped soffits. f Detainee areas will have steel plate or poured concrete ceilings.Corridors will either be the same or have veneer plaster on abuse resistant gypsum lath installed over two layers of 3/4"plywood. g Public and staff toilet rooms will have 2'X 2'ACT or veneer plaster on moisture resistant gypsum lath,painted with a glazed wall finish. h Mechanical rooms,storage rooms,workshops and other back-of-house ceilings will be exposed structure with 2'X 2'ACT where sound absorption may be required. 70 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 5 Specialties Programmatic performance • Toilet partitions in public restrooms must be designed to withstand extreme wear and tear. Surfaces should be grafitti resistant. • Doors to accessible toilet stalls shall have self-closing hinges. • Any public telephone location shall have a wall outlet available for public use of portable text telephones. • At locations with a bank of two or more public telephones,a public text phone must be provided. 6 Staircases Programmatic performance • Railing height and depth to be discussed in schematic design. • Design stairs so the stringer color contrasts visually with the color of the stair treads to help people navigate the stairs safely. • Use a contrasting color or material at the top and bottom landing to highlight change in elevation and reduce falls. • Free standing stairs must be designed to avoid being a protruding object in circulation areas. • Locate stairwell lighting so that lights can be relamped without scaffolding or lifts. System performance Design stairs to minimize deflection and noise at landings 7 Atriums and Balconies (Designer's response on page 58) Programmatic performance • Atriums may not be more than two stories. • Railing design at open areas must minimize the opportunities for jumping or falling over by have no horizontal elements for feet and sufficient depth and height to deter accidents. Design large,multi-height window areas to: • eliminate problems of glare • minimize local heat build-up • be easily cleaned on the interior • reduce dust shelves Design atrium lighting to avoid need for lifts or scaffolding to relamp fixtures. • Design atriums with surfaces and features that dampen noise reverberation. 71 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements System performance • Fire protection issues Mechanical issues 8 Interior Air Quality Programmatic performance • Prohibit smoking at the building entrance and designate a location nearby that ensures that smoke is not sucked into the interior at doors or at air intakes. Technical performance • Select materials to maximize indoor air quality.The composition of materials should be analyzed for the potential of harmful off-gassing as well as their propensity to collect and disperse pollutants,consistent with sustainable and green building requirements 9 Conveying Systems Programmatic performance • Detainee elevators shall have a lockable"cage"inside with a sliding door. In detainee elevators,all materials shall be suicide-resistant and elevators cabs equipped with security cameras. In situations where detainee elevators must also be used by staff(this is not preferred),there shall be separate doors from the elevator to the secure circulation corridor and the staff circulation In a shared-use elevator,the following controls shall be incorporated: • The elevators will normally respond to a call at any staff location. • At each detainee area(central holding and courtroom holding areas), the control will be only by a Court Officer's key. • When placed under Court Officer's operation at any location,the elevator will make its previously scheduled stop(s)before proceeding to the Courts Officer's call location. • The court officer's control key will override all other call functions. While under key operation by the court officer,the elevator will be secured and will stop only at the secure circulation corridors. • The call stations at the elevator doors in secure circulation shall be activated by key only. • "Stretcher"elevators to accommodate emergency personnel must be provided. Vertical or inclined lifts are not an acceptable means of providing vertical access to witness stands,jury boxes or judge's benches,or for any other circumstance in new construction. 72 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements System performance • Hydraulic elevators are typically not acceptable for public and freight use because with heavy use they require extensive maintenance and repair. • The level of the water table shall be considered in the design of elevator pits. In the case of a high water table in the area of the new building,sump pumps shall be included in each elevator pit. • There shall be at least one freight elevator that is easily accessible from and able to handle the loads associated with record storage,loading dock,and mechanical spaces. Technical performance Each elevator shall be equipped with a cylinder lockout for each floor. • Each elevator shall be provided with full pads and hooks for use in moving furniture and equipment. 10 Plumbing (Designer's response on page 96) Programmatic performance • In addition to multi-user public restrooms,provide one public companion restroom per floor as part of the required fixture count. • Drinking fountains shall be as follows: located in close proximity to the public toilet rooms. • have separate high and low fixtures at each location • be located so that they are not protruding into circulation spaces as required by MAAB 20.6. • Plumbing chases for detention cells shall be easily accessed from a locked door outside of the cell. • All toilet rooms shall have a hose bib and floor drains. • The holding cell area shall have a floor drain and a recessed hose bib for clean up. • For every multi-user restroom with six(6) or more stalls,provide an alternate accessible stall as per MAAB 30.6.2. System performance • Utilize the waste heat from the building system to provide a large percentage of domestic hot water. • Domestic water supply piping shall be insulated for energy efficiency and to prevent condensation. • Domestic water piping shall be run close to the underside of floor deck and to provide a minimum of 8'-6"'clearance beneath,where exposed to view. 73 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Technical performance • Sink valves on detention fixtures shall be temperature controlled to prevent detainees from scalding themselves. • Fixtures in detention cells shall be monolithic,stainless units that combine sink and toilet into a single fixture. • The flush mechanism for detainee toilets should be located outside of the cells,activated from the Control Room. • Use low water consuming toilets throughout the building. • Use low flow faucets with infrared on-off valves throughout the building. • For all toilet fixtures,waste pipes shall be sound insulated. 11 Energy Usage and Conservation Programmatic performance • Consideration must be given to aspects of the building configuration or site that present opportunities for energy conservation. Locate major ventilation equipment(intake air,exhaust,mechanical system, etc.) away from public open spaces to decrease site noise. System performance • Work with DCAM energy team and utility companies to identify opportunities for utility rebates early on in the design process. Life cycle calculations must be conducted as a condition for making design decisions.May include: HVAC equipment,heat recovery,variable speed drives,variable air volume systems,lighting,controls,envelope,building materials. • Utilize energy modeling during design phase. • Energy monitoring is required during schematic design and design development;commissioning will also be part of this project. Technical performance • Use variable speed motors. • Use solar panels to pre-heat ventilation air/domestic hot water. 12 HVAC (Designer's response on page 92) Programmatic performance • Mechanical rooms should be easily accessed from staff circulation. • The mechanical equipment shall be located in the building or within an enclosed rooftop mechanical penthouse. • It is important that the equipment be easy to work on,providing sufficient clearance to access and replace any necessary parts. Consideration should be given to the various clearances required in order to replace any necessary parts. 74 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Use a variety of different HVAC systems adapted to different conditions throughout the building.Examples:the south facade may benefit from a passive solar approach while the north side will be more dependent on mechanical supply;the computer rooms may require compressor-type air conditioning;and natural ventilation may be more effective in a narrower wing of the building while broader floor plates require a duct system. • Provide for individual control of HVAC to enhance comfort.The greater the number of HVAC and lighting zones in a building,the more responsive it can be to differences in HVAC requirements and that provides for greater control and comfort for the individual staff.Assume there will be after-hours building use. • Provide multiple vertical cores and chases to reduce the size of horizontal distribution of systems.This technique saves space as well as facilitates a larger array of HVAC,electric,communication and data zones. • Humidity control for record storage rooms and electronic equipment storage System performance • The HVAC system should be sized to respond to actual loads as opposed to rules-of-thumb. Oversizing equipment results in higher energy use and operating cost. • Consideration must be given to the design of a system that is reliable and easy to maintain,while providing cost effectiveness over the life of the system. • The HVAC system should be designed to operate most efficiently at average loads,not peak load. Peak load is a condition that occurs typically less than 5 percent of operating time. • Use occupancy sensors in each space to control heating and cooling water loops.These sensors will vary the flow depending on the number of people in the vicinity of the sensor. • Use of evaporative cooling instead of conventional refrigeration/cooling equipment may be investigated as part of schematic design.This strategy can be used by drying the air with desiccant de-humidification(this is more efficient in removing latent heat than chillers)and then using evaporative cooling to cool and add humidity back to the supply air at the same time. The elimination of conventional cooling will also eliminate chemical use. • The cooling system should have capacity to conduct a night-time ventilation purge to cool the mass of the building overnight.The HVAC system should be able to provide 100%outside air in a controlled fashion to remove the heat build-up of the day. 75 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Air intake louvers shall be located away from pollution sources and exhaust air,idling vehicles,or near any other noxious pollutants that may come from neighboring buildings.Louvers shall be located away from areas where snow might drift and cover the louvers. Filters for outside air must be effective and properly maintained,outdoor air,as well as indoor air,may contain particulates and pollutants. • Fresh air and ventilation is very important for courtrooms,holding area,jury rooms food service areas. Holding areas require 100%fresh air exchange. • Reduce duct and fan sizes by employing a displacement ventilation delivery system equipment may be investigated as part of schematic design. Deliver air in a steady,but slow,process from the floor of the spaces.Ventilation is unhampered by walls and furniture since the air is being filled from the bottom towards the ceiling. Such systems can be integrated with a raised floor air distribution concept. • Separate ventilation from heating and air conditioning systems to provide continuous fresh air delivery with a smaller,easily cleaned duct system. Slow,but continuous,air movement requires less energy.This type of system is also compatible with operable windows because heat and cooling can be separately shut off when the windows are open and the system ventilation can help continue to move fresh air throughout the space when the breezes die down.This may be investigated as part of schematic design • No internal duct insulation is to be used. • Back-up systems requirements to be determined in schematic design. Technical performance • Avoid contamination of HVAC equipment and ductwork. Do not use the systems during construction,if unavoidable,provide and frequently change proper filters.Clean equipment and ductwork as part of commissioning process. Provide sound transmission and vibration transmission and isolation features to reduce disruptive or annoying noises in all areas,but especially courtrooms. • Provide acoustical lining and sound traps for areas requiring private conversation. Air distribution devices should be constructed in low-noise configurations. • The contractor is to clean all ducts and make sure filters are clean prior to occupancy. • Ventilation distribution outlet and exhaust inlets should be designed so that building users cant block the vents. 76 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Ventilation Requirements VENTILATION REQUIREMENT Offices 20 cfm/person Courtrooms 15 cfm/person Staff Break Rooms 15 cfm/person Conference Rooms 20 cfm/person Lobbies 15 cfm/person Holding Cells 20 cfm/person Guard stations 15 cfm/person Corridors .10 cfm/person Elevator/Machine Room 1.0 cfm/sf Electrical/Mechanical Room Provide ventilation to maintain temperature <90o F Storage Rooms 4-6 air changes/hour To rooms/maintenance 75 cfm/watercloset,urinal or janitor's sink Temperature and Relative Humidity Requirements LOCATION WINTER TEMP. SUMMER TEMP. Offices 72o F 75o F at 50%RH Courtrooms 72o F 75o F at 50%RH Staff Break Rooms 72o F 75o F at 50%RH Conference Rooms 72o F 75o F at 50%RH Lobbies 72o F Ambient Holding Cells 72o F 75o F at 50%RH Guard stations 72o F 75o F at 50%RH Corridors 72o F Ambient Elevator/Machine Room 55o F-90o F,per code 55o F-90o F,per code Electrical/Mechanical Room 72o F Ambient,90o F max. Storage Rooms 72o F Ambient Toilet rooms/maintenance 72o F Ambient 77 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Room Noise Criteria Levels RC(N)for HVAC systems and Noise Criteria levels,NC for HVAC equipment shall be according to the following: Courtrooms 25—35 Offices 25—35 Open Offices 30—40 Conference Rooms 25—35 Jury Rooms 25—35 Corridors and Lobbies 40—45 13 Fire Protection (Designer's response on page 97) Technical performance • Issues for consideration: Location of standpipes • Location of fire extinguishers • Carbon monoxide detectors • Radon detectors • Atriums are not recommended because they require the installation and ongoing maintenance of a smoke evacuation system. • Coordinate the installation and compatibility of all flow,tamper,pressure, and alarm devices,required and specified,for the proper annunciation and transmission of an alarm or trouble condition to the local fire department or monitoring agency. • Coordinate with the local water department as to any local restrictions or requirements relative to backflow prevention devices and metering. Piping shall run close to the underside of floor deck and provide a minimum of 8'6"clearance beneath,where exposed to view. • Fire Protection&Sprinkler Systems: Stand-pipe and Hose Systems 14 Electrical (Designer's response on page 98) Programmatic performance • Emergency lighting in courtrooms must be provided to permit orderly evacuation in the event of an emergency. Selected lighting fixtures within the courtroom must provide an uninterrupted source of lighting in the event of a power outage. Standby power for emergency lighting to the courtrooms must be provided by local battery back-up units connected to an 78 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements emergency generator.The judge's bench must not be spotlighted by emergency lighting. • Emergency Lighting must be provided for selected lighting units in the judge's private chambers,reference/conference room,and circulation spaces. • Emergency Lighting must be provided in the jury assembly area,trial jury suite,and grand jury suite. • The judges'conference room and robing room must have emergency lighting. • Cat G standard requirement for all wiring/cabling for telecommunication and computer networks • For consideration during schematic design—any special equipment with high power needs. All transformers shall be K-type. • For consideration during schematic design-Location of electrical panels— in staff circulation areas—locked access panels System performance • The vertical power distribution system shall be designed for easy repair and modification through vertical stacking of electrical closets and simplified modular connections to horizontal distribution systems. • Switching,electrical panels,and controls shall be located for ease of access and to allow for future electrical systems expansion. Electrical systems shall be designed for total connected load requirements,plus a 25—30% allowance for expansion. Provide molded case main and branch circuit breakers at the main switchboard with the interrupting rating necessary to safely interrupt a postulated full three-phase line to ground fault without damage.Circuit breakers shall feed building mechanical equipment including elevators and 120/208V 3-phase 4-wire panelboards. • Provide motors 1HP and larger at 480 volt and power lighting at 277 volts and all 120/208 volt from K-type transformers Provide separate switchboard breakers and panelboards for the electrical equipment loads supporting the Sallyport,security and CCTV systems,and secure area to prevent shutdown of these loads when servicing miscellaneous building mechanical and area loads. • An emergency power distribution system shall be provided for emergency lighting,computer systems,and security systems.An emergency generator is preferred.The computer room can use UPS. • Consider using photovoltaic-assisted power to provide energy for fans.They are most cost-effective to power systems that have the majority of their use during the day and low level requirements at night. 79 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Technical performance • Provide a shunt trip breaker for the elevator load. All motors over 5 hp shall be premium efficiency. • Disconnecting means shall be provided at all equipment. 15 Lighting and Branch Wiring (Designer's response on page 99) Programmatic performance • Natural lighting is greatly desired for workspaces including courtrooms and hearing rooms. Use daylight for 90 percent of the ambient lighting requirements.This can be effected through windows,skylights,light wells, and interior windows that capture light from adjacent spaces.At the same time building users should be able to control natural light,especially with regard to glare at workstations and video display terminals.Any shading devices should minimize glare. • Quality of light is as important as quantity of foot-candles. Lighting should make people and things look attractive through consideration of lamp color temperature and strategies for positioning diffuse and direct lighting. Building finishes should be selected under the primary lighting conditions under which they will be installed. Fixtures should be easy to service,and as maintenance-free as possible. Use of specialized lamps with obscure suppliers,or that are susceptible to damage,or are expensive to replace should not be specified in the design. • Combine ambient general lighting with workstation task lighting for maximum efficiency.The ambient light should be kept at a low level in offices and passageways and higher in file areas and other general office spaces. Environments with diverse lighting levels are more interesting and reduce energy consumption and individually controlled environments have been demonstrated to significantly increase productivity and staff comfort. Direct lighting in the courtrooms should be used to place emphasis on the judge's position and to promote the position of the witness,jury and attorneys during deliberations. Lighting should promote dear visual communication and security. • Avoid materials and architectural composition that creates visual"noise"for deaf people,or that can confuse way-finding by persons with low vision. • Lighting controls: Consideration should be given for each space as to who will operate the lighting controls and under what circumstances. Use of pre-set or pre-programmed lighting settings?Controls should be used easily and intuitively—large banks of switches can be confusing. 80 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Where possible,use occupancy sensors for control of lighting. • Emphasis should be on compact fluorescent lighting. Lighting levels should be coordinated with security camera sensitivity. System performance • Natural lighting should be used wherever possible to reduce the building's energy requirements. Fixtures should be low wattage for energy conservation and low heat so as to minimize heating loads on the HVAC system. • Lighting the building at night? (timers for emergency lighting only or 10% lighting?) Technical performance • Utilize dimmable ballasts for fluorescent fixtures and control them with area daylight sensors to provide efficient,balanced,and integrated lighting systems so that the fixtures emit only the necessary level of artificial light to supplement the available natural daylight. 16 Sound System and AudioNisual Recommendations for Courtrooms Programmatic performance • Install a permanently wired assistive listening system for hearing impaired participants and language translation. Provide separate audio/visual control cabinets in courtrooms or in A/V closets adjacent to the well. Do not place A/V equipment racks under the judge's bench. Low profile desk microphones are recommended so that views to the speaker are not obscured. Plan sidebar microphones for the electronic record. Provide adequate A/V system training to all courtroom personnel to properly adjust sound systems in courtrooms. System performance • If a wireless microphone system is used,provide wall-mounted antennas with equipment located on a centralized equipment rack. • Carefully locate all receptables to optimize cable management and provide flush junction boxes and connections for them. Provide a masking system over the jury box to allow for confidentiality during judge's bench conferences. • If access flooring is not provided,provide generously sized flush floorboxes with voice,data and power connections within the well.Carefully consider the location of the floorboxes to allow for the requirements of movable furnishings. 81 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Plan for the future integration of automation technologies into the courtroom,including large screen video monitors,computer-based Judge's bench,and computer-generated display technology. Technical performance • Provide individual control of each microphone at the clerk's station. Provide an on-off switch at each microphone for each station. Provide a microphone mute button at the judge's bench. 17 Acoustics Programmatic performance • The courtroom acoustics should be designed to minimize the need for voice amplification,although amplification might be used.A good quality an well- designed sound system is essential where audio and video recording devices are used. • Courtroom acoustics should amplify and diffuse sound,limit reverberation, and control external noise.An audio specialist should be consulted so that the architecture,materials,furniture and equipment are coordinated for an optimum acoustical environment. • The well and the spectator areas of the courtroom require different acoustical conditions. Sound in the well should be balanced with sound- reflecting wall surfaces,and sound-absorbing floor and ceiling materials that reduce reflected sound. • Provide sound lock vestibules at the public entry of the courtrooms.The attorney/client conference room should be entered through this vestibule. System performance • The spectator area should be treated with highly absorptive materials to eliminate reverberation from sound from the well,and to reduce the level of noise made by spectators. Barrel vaulting or coffered ceilings can create a fluttering echo if the acoustical treatment is not appropriate. • Courtroom"rumble"can be minimized by locating air handling equipment away from the courtrooms. • Courtroom"hiss'can be minimized by maintaining low air velocities at the diffusers. • Noise from fluorescent lighting ballasts can be quieted by relocating the ballast to a remote location or changing to an electronic type. See also the section below regarding mechanical equipment for additional considerations concerning sound isolation. 82 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Technical performance • Sound Transmission Class rating for wall assemblies should be greater than or equal to 50 STC for areas that need to be acoustically isolated from adjacent spaces.These areas include courtrooms,hearing rooms,jury deliberation rooms,judicial chambers,and conference rooms. For a vestibule configuration,provide a solid-core wood door with a single smoke gasket around the perimeter and jamb,and drop bottom gaskets or thresholds for sound isolation. • For a non-vestibule configuration—provide a compression gasket and a smoke gasket in addition to door bottom gaskets with a threshold for sound isolation. • An integral bubble gasket with dual gasketing around the entire perimeter and head is an effective sound gasketing configuration for a single door from a secured area. 18 Security (Designer's response on page 102) An integrated security,fire alarm and energy management system must be investigated as part of schematic design and design development. Programmatic performance General • Courthouse security requires coordination of architectural design, security personnel,and security systems and equipment. Basic architectural solutions to security problems are an integral part of planning and design for the courthouse. • Separation of public,restricted,and secure circulation patterns and provision of secure prisoner holding and interview facilities are essential security design elements. • Courthouse security system and equipment design includes both perimeter and interior security. Perimeter security includes considerations of site,parking,lighting,access control at building entrances,and intrusion detection/alarm systems. • Interior security includes personnel security,security of property and documents,access control to interior spaces,personnel movement and circulation controls,security aspects of spatial arrangements,and the coordination and integration of security and fire safety requirements. Site Security • The building must be physically protected from vehicles using passive barriers such as bollards and planters. 83 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Special attention must be given to the location and configuration of plants outside the building,particularly at parking and building entrances.Plants must be small and low so they cannot be used as hiding places or obstruct site lines.Landscaping can also be used to enhance security by preventing encroachment on the building setback. • Sufficient lighting is critical to the safety of the public and employees outside the courthouse. Illumination must be provided for areas between cars and around bushes and shrubs.Higher levels of illumination are required at vehicle and pedestrian entrances.All perimeter lighting must support the operation of CCTV cameras. Vehicle Access and Parking • Vehicle access onto the site may be controlled at a single point with electronic access control and hydraulic vehicle barriers. • Provide electronic access control to judges'parking. Judges'parking should be located in a totally enclosed area under the building or if this is not possible,in a fenced area with minimal public view of the parking area and the judge's path to the building.A separate restricted entrance to the building from the parking area must be provided. Parking for service vehicles must be located outside the court building. Where service and delivery vehicles are parked adjacent to the court building, the area must be designed to reflect and withstand explosions.Where a parking lot guard is provided,vehicular deliveries can be channeled past the guard post for screening. Building Perimeter • An intrusion-detection system covering all perimeter doors,including roof access,must be install in the courthouse.Ground floor or accessible windows must be protected with glass break detectors or other sensor technology. • Where permissible by code,emergency exits should be equipped with magnetic locks or electric strikes connected to an alarm/time delay mechanism or the fire alarm/sprinkler system. Electric locking systems on fire doors should be connected to battery back-up power and emergency generators.The systems must remain locked from the outside during a power failure. Building Entrances • The public entry is controlled by a security station.All persons entering the building must pass through a metal detector and a turnstile. Packages and briefcases must be scanned by X-ray. In addition,the lobby area must have a CCTV camera and the security station,a duress alarm device. 84 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • All employees must enter the courthouse through the public entry screening point.If a separate employee entry is provided,electronic access control,a CCTV camera,and an intercom should be installed. • Entrance from the judges'parking area to the restricted elevator via a restricted lobby must have electronic access control,a CCTV camera,an intercom and a duress alarm device. • A single building entry point for supplies and services must be provided by the loading dock and service area.The loading dock entry must have electrically-controlled doors,with remote control and monitoring. Intercom and CCTV systems must be installed to alert security personnel to the arrival of delivery trucks and allow surveillance of the loading dock area. • Consideration should be given to the possibility of afterhours use. Interior Security/Circulation Controls Access to secure corridors and staff corridors may be controlled by electronic access control such as a card reader system. • Service circulation can be located within restricted circulation. • The building design must allow for the movement of prisoners from the vehicle sallyport into central holding facilities and to holding cells adjacent to trial courtrooms without passing or entering public or restricted spaces. A secure area-of-refuge is required for protection of the judiciary during emergencies. • The central cellblock must be designated an area-of-refuge for prisoners. Courtroom Security • Each courtroom must be keyed separately with a sub-master. Doors from restricted circulation,excluding fire exits,must have free access from restricted circulation and access control on the courtroom side. • Duress Alarm Devices must be located at the judge's bench,courtroom clerk station,and court officer station(if present).All duress alarm device in a courtroom should report as a single zone. Public egress from the courtroom should be through public circulation. Emergency egress doors,used by judges,must have free access from restricted circulation and an alarmed crash bar for second means of egress on the courtroom side. • A CCTV camera must be provided for the public lobby areas outside each courtroom. 85 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Judges'Chambers Suite Security • A CCTV camera,intercom,and electric door strike must be provided at the visitor entry door to restricted circulation and at the suite entrance.The system must be monitored and controlled from the secretary workstation and from one of the law clerk offices in the suite. Electronically-controlled entry doors must be fail-secure. • Duress Alarm devices must be installed in the chambers suite under the secretary's desk,judge's desk,and one law clerk's desk,with all three reporting as a single zone to the security control center. Jury Facility Security • A duress alarm device must be provided at the jury check-in counter,located in the jury assembly area and at the trial jury and grand jury suite security workstations. Court Library Security • The public entrance to the library must be provided a key-lock.A key-lock or electronic access control from the library to restricted circulation must also be provided. • Duress Alarm Devices must be provided at the circulation desk,library staff offices,and study areas. Clerks Office Security Public entrances to Clerk's Offices must be provided a key-lock. Public access to restricted office areas is controlled with an electric lock operated at the public counter workstation. Employee access from public circulation is controlled by key-lock or electronic access control.Access from the clerk's Office to restricted circulation,if provided,is controlled key-lock or electronic access control. • Evidence vaults in the clerk's Office must have a keypad shunt,vault door contacts,heat sensors,motion detector,and a duress alarm device monitored at the security control center. • Duress Alarm Devices must be located in the clerk's private office,as well as the staff side of the public counter,secure storage,vaults,and other selected office areas.The alarms must be logically zoned. Judiciary Related Office The public entrance to judiciary-related offices must be provided a key-lock. Public access to the office areas is controlled with an electric lock operated at the public counter or reception workstation.Employee access from public circulation is controlled by key-lock or electronic access control.Access from the judiciary-related offices to restricted circulation,if provided,in controlled by key-lock or electronic access control. 86 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements • Vaults must have a keypad shunt,vault door contact,heat sensor,motion detector,and duress alarm device. Duress Alarm devices must be placed on the staff side of transaction windows,near the receptionist at the main entrance door,secure storage, and other selected areas.They must also be placed in interview rooms, supervisors'offices,and offices of Probation/Pretrial Services Supervision officers. • Where appropriate,a CCTV camera,monitor,and intercom can be used to screen visitors. System performance CCTV • Install sufficient CCTV cameras to provide complete perimeter coverage and to monitor access to restricted and secure parking areas,parking spaces,and associated building entrances. • Emergency doors must be self-locking and equipped with a remote alarm and interior CCTV camera. • A CCTV camera must be installed inside the building at each remote exit. • Conduits for CCTV must be installed in all four corners of courtrooms to accommodate current and future camera installation.Where cameras are installed,recessed housings must be provided in the wall or ceiling. Cameras must be positioned to prevent room lighting from interfering with the view or picture quality. Security Alarms Intrusion-detection systems and locking systems is usually the first line of protection.Interior intrusion alarms and perimeter intrusion- detection systems should be combined. • Duress Alarm devices should be logically zoned for connection to the main security control center. Prisoner Security • A secure perimeter system must surround the central cellblock and courtroom holding cell areas. Technical performance All ground floor or accessible windows must be sealed and glazed with break-resistant(UL-972)materials. 19 Waste Management (Designer's response on page 102) 87 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 4.6 Building Systems: Designer's Response This section provides the Designer's narrative of Salem Trial Court building systems, organized as follows: A Infrastructure 1 Foundations and Basement Construction 88 2 Structural Systems 89 B Exterior Envelope 1 Roof Construction 90 2 Exterior Walls 90 3 Exterior Windows 90 4 Curtain Wall 91 5 Mechanical Penthouse 91 C Mechanical and Electrical Systems 1 Introduction 91 2 HVAC System Description 92 3 General Exhaust Systems 93 4 Chilled Water System 93 5. Hot Water System 93 6. Heat Recovery 94 7. Entry,Waiting and Concourse Areas 94 8. Loading Dock Ventilation and Heating 94 9. Stair Pressurization 94 10. Controls 94 11. Miscellaneous Systems 94 12. Systems Commissioning 95 13. Plumbing and Fire Protection Systems 95 14. Electrical Systems 98 15. Telecommunication 100 16. Security 102 17. Waste Management 102 18. Issues for Final Design 102 A INTRASTRUCTURE 1 Foundations and Basement Construction The existing drawings for the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building indicate it is supported on spread footings.The 1977 addition to the north side of the existing courthouse is supported on belled caissons bearing on the clay layer with an allowable bearing pressure of 5 TSF. Preliminary geotechnical information indicates that materials immediately below the proposed Trial Court building are urban fills with traces of organic peat,and with 88 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements sand and clay layers located at least 30 feet below grade. Further site investigation will be necessary.It is likely that the suitable foundation system for this building is either belled caissons or pressured injected footings(PIFs),or a combination of both systems with caps,grade beams and tie beams. The lower level of the Trial Court building is on grade with respect to Bridge Street but the rear wall facing Federal Street and the west side wall facing North Street will be retaining earth and may be a few feet below the existing water table.These walls will require waterproofing. It is recommended that the lower level floor slab be designed to resist uplift,as a two-way slab spanning between pilecaps.A mud slab supporting a waterproof membrane will be under the floor slab. The existing church building is to be moved in a south-southwest direction to a higher ground. It will have a basement floor to be used for library storage. Pending the results of future geotechnical investigations,it is likely that the relocated church building will be supported on spread footings.The basement slab will likely to a 6-inch thick reinforced concrete slab-on-grade.The basement walls will also be cast-in-place reinforced concrete, 12"thick minimum. Elevator pit walls and floor slabs will require waterproofing. 2 Structural Systems The Trial Court building will be steel framed with bolted connections and stabilized against wind and seismic forces by concentrically braced steel frames in both orthogonal directions.Floor slabs will be 3 I/"lightweight concrete topping on a 3-inch thick composite metal deck spanning the ten foot direction. Two 40-foot wide courtrooms on either side of a 19-foot wide detainee holding bay set the typical structural bay for this courthouse at 40 ft, 19 ft,40 ft in one direction by 20 ft in the other direction.W 18s at ten feet on center span the 40 ft bay and frame into W 21s that span the 20 ft length. Floors to floor heights will be set to accommodate the functions occurring on that floor. Floors that have transaction areas will have floor-to-floor heights of 13'-0". Floors that have courtrooms will have heights of 18'-6"floor-to-floor. Where compact,high density,mobile filing systems are used for Active Record Storage,the structural bay will be reduced to 20 feet by 20 feet.They will be 89 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements framed with W 18s at 5 ft o.c.with 4-1/2"normal weight concrete on 3"metal deck. Deflection must be limited to the span/2000. Floor slabs supporting the mechanical penthouses will have a 4-1/2"normal weight concrete topping on a 3-inch composite metal deck to control floor vibration and noise transmission to the floor below. B EXTERIOR ENVELOPE 1 Roof Construction A fire rated, 3-ply modified bitumen roof system with"Cool White"cap sheet is proposed. Protective walk pads are specified where required to service roof top mechanical equipment.A minimum pitch of I/"per foot to the roof drains will be provided by the tapered insulation. A green roof is proposed for the open light well that provides daylight to interior courtrooms.The green roof will be designed as an extensive roof requiring little maintenance.The construction from the deck up starts with a waterproof membrane followed by protection board,root barrier,insulation panels,drainage mat,moisture retention mat,system filters,engineered soils and a vegetated ground cover. Integral roof drains to have either nickel bronze or stainless steel grating assembly with debris screens and flashing clamps. Drains from roof shall not be routed through occupied areas—these will be routed through circulation areas wherever possible. 2 Exterior Walls Exterior wall materials and anchorage systems are specified to be non-corrosive in the salt air environment of Salem.Exterior wall construction will be a cavity wall,consisting of masonry(brick and granite)anchored with stainless steel to a concrete block wall back-up.The cavity wall side of the CMU backup will be covered with a continuous air/vapor barrier and rigid insulation.A brick manufactured in New England is proposed for the Bridge Street elevation, wrapping around the east and west sides to the two stair towers. Four inch thick granite cladding is proposed for the Federal Street entry pavilion on the south, east and west elevations.Three centimeter granite is carried as an Alternate. 3 Exterior Windows Punched openings will be filled with thermally broken aluminum casement and fixed window units with insulating,low E glass. 90 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 4 Curtain Wall An aluminum curtainwall is proposed for the south elevation of the courtroom wing letting in daylight and offering views to all main courtroom waiting areas and public circulation areas. Insulating glass units with low E are proposed. The curtainwall will be shaded by fixed aluminum shading devices by the curtainwall manufacturer.If windows are not flush against exterior walls,install bird preventative measures. Automatically controlled operable sunshades to reduce solar glare and heat gain are carried as an alternate. PowerShade,a building integrated photovoltaic sunshade that generates solar power while also providing optimal solar shading, is priced as another Alternate.This will be further investigated during design development. 5 Mechanical Penthouses Two mechanical penthouses will be required and will be steel framed with zinc coated copper standing seam siding.Anodized aluminum is proposed as an alternate.One stair will serve each penthouse. Floor slabs are designed to reduce vibration and noise to spaces below. See structural notes above. C MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 1 Introduction Originally,the Salem Courts project included analysis and renovations to the Probate and Family Court(PFC) as well as the New Trial Court.Over the course of the analysis and study,the scope of work has been reduced to encompass only the New Trial Court Building(NTC) and the Church building. Under separate reports,studies were performed,attached in the Appendices as indicated: a Salem Probate and Family Court Existing Conditions Report, Draft September 26,2005, Revised November 11,2005,Goody Clancy (Appendix A2.1) b Salem Courts,MEP HVAC Options for Minimal Renovation to PFC, September 27,2006(Appendix A2.7) c Salem Trial Courts Mechanical and Electrical Systems Analysis, SEi Companies [Including renovation of Probate and Family Court Building]; HVAC drawings, SEi Companies,January 31,2006,April 12, 2006 (Appendix A1.2) d Salem Trial Courts,Mechanical K Electrical Systems Analysis, SEi, February 13,2007; Salem New Trial Court,Mechanical Drawings, 91 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements February 6,2007;J. Michael Ruane Judicial Center, Salem,Massachusetts Plumbing and Fire Protection Systems Analysis,draft February 2007 (Appendix A2.4) 2 HVAC System Description Primary air handling systems A major factor in the system selection is the varied usage and varying people densities in the different spaces. This characteristic requires proper ventilation to each space type(i.e.,courtroom,vs.office vs.conference room)and the ability to control that ventilation in occupied/unoccupied modes for energy efficiency. Our recommendation brings us to a dual air approach to maximize energy efficiency and to minimize building duct distribution,yet providing superior air quality and temperature control characteristics. a The first air system is comprised of three Dedicated Outdoor Air Systems (DOAS)which will provide the outdoor air(OA)ventilation requirement to each of the building spaces.These units will directly provide OA to each courtroom or building zone.These units,complete with enthalpy heat recovery,will be variable volume in control with individual zone air box on/off control according to occupancy.This control assures the exact OA to each space as required yet can be shut off when the zone is not in use to maximize energy savings. b The second air system is comprised of multiple VAV air handlers providing the individual room air temperature control. Used in concert with the DOAS system,these VAV air handlers are then fully recirculating units such that heating coils are not necessary in the units eliminating coil HW piping. The units will,however have airside economizer controls(the use of all outdoor air for cooling)to maximize energy efficiency in the intermediate cooling seasons. c Due to the architectural configuration of the proposed new building construction,the HVAC air distribution pattern lends itself to four broad air handling zones:two vertical distribution zones along the Bridge Street building axis,one zone for the south wing toward Federal Street and one zone for the church reuse. i For the axis along Bridge Street,the air handling units would be located in the roof penthouse with distribution running vertical and horizontal from this location. For the south wing toward Federal Street,the air handling units would be located on the roof penthouse on that wing with distribution running vertical and horizontal from this location. For the church renovation into the law library,it is proposed that those units would be located in the new basement of that church building. 92 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements ii The Church renovation building would be served by a single VAV air handling system complete with its full outdoor air component.As the building is generally one zone,there is no need to provide two systems for this building.This unit will be in the 12,000 CFM range.When final plan layouts and space usage is defined and envelope characteristics are determined,we will determine if and where baseboard radiation will be needed. iii The air handling units shall feed a common supply duct headers in the penthouse and be distributed to vertical shafts serving the building floors below. iv Supply risers shall have sound attenuators in the vertical drops.Air shall be distributed through VAV valves with VAV manufacturer's attenuators and duct mounted reheat coils. 3 General Exhaust Systems Roof mounted centrifugal dome fans shall be used for toilet exhaust systems and penthouse mechanical room exhaust systems. 4 Chilled Water System a Chilled water for the project shall be provided by two 280-ton centrifugal water cooled chillers located in the basement of the new trial court.The chillers will have variable frequency drives. b The chilled water system will be designed around a temperature differential of 14°F (42°to 56°F). c A primary chilled water pumping system shall be provided.The system shall consist of three(3)variable speed vertical split coupled chilled water pumps (1 is a standby). Use 60%glycol. d Two(2) 280-ton cooling towers shall be located on the roof.The cooling towers fans will have variable speed drives.The condenser water system will have three(3)vertical split coupled pumps (1 is a standby). 5 Hot Water System a Building heating hot water for the project will be provided by three (3) 100 boiler horse power(BHP) gas-fired,water tube boilers located in the basement of the new trial court. b Hot water will be distributed to hot water reheat coils,air handling unit heating coils and perimeter baseboard radiation via three(3)vertical split coupled variable speed drive pumps. c Boiler breeching shall be double wall and extend to 10 feet above the roof of the building. 93 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 6 Heat Recovery The building's dedicated outside air system(DOAS) exhaust and supply air handling units shall contain enthalpy heat recovery wheels. 7 Entry,Waiting and Concourse Areas The multi-story space will be designed so as not to require a dedicated smoke emergency evacuation system.It will be conditioned from the main supply and return air system and supplemented by an under floor hot water/chilled water radiant heating system. 8 Loading Dock Ventilation and Heating Variable flow exhaust fans with a capacity of 1.5 CFM/SF will provide the motive force for ventilation.The rate of exhaust flow will be determined by carbon monoxide(CO) sensors distributed throughout the area. Makeup air will be provided by a combination of the open truck entrance and transfer ductwork with direct connections to the outdoors. Heating will be provided by overhead radiant heaters or unit heaters.Air curtain to be considered during schematic design to maintain indoor temperature at loading dock. 9 Stair Pressurization Provide stairway and elevator hoistway pressurization systems. 10 Controls The building will have a stand-alone Direct Digital Control(DDC) system to control and monitor all functions of the building mechanical systems.The front- end controls computer will be located in the basement mechanical room. 11 Miscellaneous Systems Mechanical and main electric rooms shall be ventilated with 100%outdoor air via side wall intake louvers and ducted exhaust to either a sidewall louver or roof mounted fan.The exhaust system shall be controlled by a room thermostat. Heating shall be accomplished via hot water horizontal unit heaters. Entries and exterior stairwells shall have hot water cabinet unit heaters. Elevator machine rooms and tel/data rooms shall be cooled via the main building supply air units. 94 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 12 Systems Commissioning The new Trial Court Building will be fully and formally commissioned.A commissioning section will be included in the specification. DCAM will retain an independent third-party commissioning authority/agent(Cx-A)to act as the Commissioning Authority.The Commissioning Authority will observe and document the commissioning work of mechanical and electrical systems;power factor study at completion of construction. All prime contractors,trade contractors,subcontractors,installing subcontractors, air balancing and controls contractors,vendors,equipment and material suppliers and the like are part of the commissioning team and are required to take part in the complete commissioning process. 13 Plumbing and Fire Protection Systems Storm Water System Two new storm drains will serve the new Trial Court Building.Each will be 10" in diameter and will discharge to Bridge Street. Storm leaders will run vertically from their respective roof drains to horizontal collection points on the lower floors.Any portion of the horizontal line exposed to outdoor conditions will be heat traced. Storm leaders may not be routed through occupied areas—these will be routed through circulation areas wherever possible. Sanitary Waste Two new sanitary waste lines will serve the new Trial Court Building. Each will be 8"in diameter and will discharge to Bridge Street. Sanitary waste lines will run vertically from their respective toilet rooms cores to collection points on the lower floors.Vent stacks will run vertically to the roof as necessary to accommodate the new program.Any portion of the horizontal line exposed to outdoor conditions will be heat traced. Domestic Cold Water The new Trial Court Building will be served by a dedicated 4"water service.This service will enter from the Bridge Street side of the building into a small mechanical room.The mechanical room will serve only the water service entrance,water meter,and backflow preventer. The new Trial Court Building will have a dedicated cold water distribution system delivering water to all fixtures.The piping will be routed as necessary to accommodate the program.If pressure is insufficient booster pumps will be provided. 95 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Domestic Hot Water The new Trial Court Building will be provided with a dedicated gas fired water heater.The heater will be located in a dedicated mechanical room close to the water service entrance.A new gas service will be provided along with through wall venting and air intake. Considering distances between some fixtures and the hot water heater,the system will be provided with a re-circulation pipe loop to maintain the water temperature.Circulating pumps will be necessary to deliver and return the hot water to remote parts of the system. Water and Sewer Estimates DCAM has developed water consumption quantities based on water efficient equipment.Anticipated water consumption for the courthouse will come from domestic uses (drinking and sanitary),janitorial activities and provision of makeup water to mechanical systems (i.e.,air handlers,cooling towers,pumps, etc).The City of Salem will supply the proposed courthouse water needs via an existing water main located in Federal Street. Based on data collected from existing courthouses of 1,350 persons,the maximum domestic water consumption would be 4,725 gpd.The non-domestic water consumption during winter months is anticipated to be 5,000 to 6,000 gpd.The seasonal range in daily consumption is due to the need for makeup water to compensate for evaporation loss from the cooling towers. In anticipation of achieving LEE certification,attempts have been,and will be made,to reduce the water consumption at the proposed courthouse by use of energy/water efficient equipment and limiting the use of potable for landscape irrigation. Probate and Registry of Deeds Building,11979 Addition Domestic Water Usage 5,820 Gallons Per Day Discharge to Sewer 5,820 Gallons Per Day New Trial Court Building Domestic Water Usage 11,000 Gallons Per Day Discharge to Sewer 11,000 Gallons Per Day 96 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements Fire Protection Systems The fire protection systems evaluated include the following:fire service entrance to the buildings,fire pump requirement,standpipe system,and sprinkler system. Fire Service Entrance The fire service for the new Trial Court Building will enter in the same location as the domestic water service.The service will be 6"in diameter,with a 4"fire department connection and water flow alarm located in a conspicuous location in the rear of the building. Fire Pump The system pressure requirements for the New Trial Court building will be no more than the requirements of the existing system for the 1979 addition to the Probate and Registry of Deeds.Therefore,it is assumed that a fire pump will not be required for the new building. However,this will need to be confirmed by a water flow test to determine water flow,static and residual pressure. Standpipe System A 4"standpipe along with the required 2-1/2"fire department valves will be provided in each stairwell and anywhere else required by the new program. In certain locations the standpipe will be in combination with the sprinkler system. Sprinkler System Incoming 8"fire service will enter the building into the Fire Pump room at ground level and be provided with a double detector check valve type backflow prevention device.The system will consist of a fire pump,jockey pump,controls and automatic transfer switches.These systems are required to be on emergency power. The building will be protected by a fully automatic sprinkler system. Dry sprinkler systems will be required in areas of the building that can not maintain temperatures above freezing at all times including Judges Parking, Receiving and the Sallyport. Closed head pre-action sprinkler system in MDF Closets and Inactive Records Storage area(may be constructed on first mezzanine)will consist of a pre-action valve system,compressor and control panel. 97 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements In some locations the sprinkler riser will be in combination with the standpipe system. Sprinklers will generally be concealed pendant type,or suicide resistant in lock-up areas. 14 Electrical Systems Electrical System Description National Grid will provide primary electric service,including wiring and exterior pad mounted switch and two 2,000 kVA transformers and pads to serve 277/480 volts to the Courthouse's interior switchboards. Provide primary conduit ductbank and secondary conduit ductbank and wiring from the exterior transformers to building's interior switchboards. Each switchboard shall be 4,000Amp 277/480 volt,3 phase 4 wire 60 hz grounded circuit breaker switchboard with 3,000A-3P main circuit breaker. New distribution throughout the building shall be 277/480 volt, 3 phase 4 wire for mechanical and lighting loads.Dry type step down transformers shall be provided to provide power for incandescent lighting,receptacles and other 120/208 volt loads. Panelboards for lighting,office power and mechanical power shall be located in electric closets and mechanical rooms. New Wiring Methods a MC and AC cable may be used for branch circuiting as allowed by the NEC and as allowed by the local authorities having jurisdiction. b All penetrations through fire and smoke partitions and floors will be firestopped. c Fishwires will be installed in all empty raceways. Emergency Service and Distribution a All emergency lighting and smoke evacuation shall be provided from a 1,250 kW,480/277 volt diesel powered generator.Generator shall be installed on site with acoustic weatherproof enclosure. Emergency generator shall provide power to standby loads including heating and other loads as dictated by design. b Provide 2 hour rated feeders and emergency distribution closet for all life safety and emergency loads. 98 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements c The emergency distribution will be broken up into three systems with one or more transfer switches serving each of the following: i Life safety ii Elevator iii Standby(non-essential) d Emergency lighting shall be provided in courtrooms. Select fixtures shall also be provided with battery backup ballasts to provide lighting during the transfer from normal to emergency power.The lighting shall be designed such that this emergency lighting does not provide spot lighting for the judge's bench. e In addition to the courtrooms and circulation areas for egress,emergency lighting shall be provided in the following areas: i Jury assembly area ii Trial jury suite iii Grand jury suite iv Judge's private chambers,conference room and robing room v Other areas as dictated by design Grounding a A perimeter grounding system comprising driven ground rods,buried copper cable,connections to building steel and copper ground buses shall be provided.The maximum resistance to ground for the ground system shall be two ohms. b All feeders and branch circuits shall be provided with a green equipment ground conductor.A ground wire and ground buses shall be provided in all telecommunications rooms and closets. Lighting and Power a Provide convenience outlets generally in courtrooms,offices,public areas, mechanical rooms and electrical rooms as dictated by design. i Lighting will be designed to meet the aesthetic qualities for the individual design areas.The lighting will also be designed in accordance with Owner's standards for quality and efficiency. ii The lighting will be designed to meet and exceed the requirements of the Massachusetts State Energy Code. iii Lighting levels and quality will be designed to meet or exceed IESNA guidelines. iv Lighting controls will be provided for individual occupancy control in each design area.Controls will be provided to allow for multiple levels of lighting for occupant comfort and use. 99 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements v Occupancy sensors and time clock controlled lighting contractors will be incorporated to provide automatic lighting controls throughout the facility and for exterior site lighting.Automatic lighting controls for individual spaces will be provided to meet the individual requirements of the respective spaces and will be determined in subsequent meetings. Fire Alarm a An addressable type fire alarm system shall be provided.The main control panel(FACP) shall be located in the water fire service room.The system shall be connected to the Salem Fire Department via a leased telephone line for alarm and trouble indications in accordance with the building code. i The fire alarm system shall operate manually via fire alarm pull stations located at egress locations on each level. ii The fire alarm system shall operate automatically via smoke detectors located in corridors,lobbies,electrical closets,and other selected spaces. Automatic operation shall also be initiated by smoke detectors in the HVAC air-handling units. Sprinkler system shall also initiate automatic operation.Alarms shall be horn/strobe units. iii Activation of the sprinkler system shall also trip a radio master box to alarm the Salem Fire Department. Other Electrical Systems a Where heat trace systems are provided under section 15000,provide power and final testing and connections. b An empty raceway system shall be provided for security system and CCTV devices in the building to corridors,stairwells and grade level perimeter doors. c An empty raceway system shall be provided for audio/visual systems. d No conditioned power(Uninterruptible power supplies(UPS),special transformers,isolated ground systems etc)is anticipated at this time. e Lightning protection will be provided to protect the building from lightning strikes with lightning rods along the roof perimeter,around the penthouses, cooling towers and emergency generator enclosure. 15 Telecommunication Verizon Service Verizon will provide a single point of entry into the new Court House Building.Verizoh s infrastructure shall be via copper cable terminated on 100 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements lightning protection and or fiber optic cables or both.This presence will be in The Main Distribution Frame(MDF). Telephone Distribution The telephone distribution will be copper backbone cabling distributed from the proposed MDF located on the basement level.The(2)proposed Internal Distribution Frame(IDF)closets per floor shall be connected via new copper backbone cables to the proposed MDF.All new voice station cabling shall be terminated on 110 type terminations.Cables will feed from the MDF/IDF to all voice outlets. Data Distribution High speed data communications services will be distributed from the MDF to each IDF via multi strand multimode fiber optic cables. Telecommunications Grounding System a A telecommunications main grounding busbar will be in the MDF connected with a minimum#4 grounding conductor to the main electrical ground. b Provide a telecommunications bonding backbone from the MDF main grounding busbar through the IDF rooms and terminated on a grounding busbar at the last closet. c Provide a telecommunications busbar in each closet d Bond all busbars to the telecommunications bonding backbone. e Bond all tap/splitters,distribution devices,racks etc to the grounding busbar. Codes and Standards The Telecommunications System will be designed to conform,as a minimum,to the following codes and standards: a Local and State Building Department Codes. b Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA). c Underwriters Laboratories (UL). d National Fire Protection Association(NFPA). e National Electrical Code(NEC). f Massachusetts Electrical Code (MEC) g Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). h ANSI /TIA/EIA 568-B 2.1 Commercial building cabling standard. 101 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 4 Design Requirements 16 Security The Security System shall consist of Security Management System(SMS),Closed Circuit Television(CCTV) System,Card Access System, Intercom System, Graphical User Interface(GUI),all applicable wire and cable,and the functional integration of all subsystems through subsystem interfaces. 17 Waste Management The proposed conceptual design has a loading dock/receiving area located on grade,accessed through a common service court entered off Bridge Street. The elevated loading dock has three weather protected loading bays of sufficient height;two sized to accommodate 45 foot trucks and one sized to accommodate a FedEX or UPS delivery van.An additional bay accommodates a trash compactor/ dumpster.Overhead rolling steel doors are provided to close off the elevated loading dock.A storage room immediately adjacent to the loading dock will provide secure conditioned space for trash and recyclables.The dock is sized to accommodate an X-ray machine,scissors lift/dock levelers and pallet trucks. Mechanical systems will be designed to prevent truck exhaust from entering the building.The ceiling above the truck bays will be sound proofed as well as the exterior wall above the entry at the loading bays.Windows on the floor immediately above the dock will be specified to provide acoustic isolation so that the courtroom above will not be adversely impacted by noise originating from the loading dock area. 18 Issues for Final Design a Flow test b Storm drainage alternatives c AOTC prefers conduit to local distribution point,with MC cable for drops (See 4.6, C.14/New Wiring Methods,page 99) d Per AOTC Uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) are required in this facility. Specialized transformers and isolated ground systems will be reviewed in schematic design. (See 4.6, C.14/Other Electrical Systems,page 101) e Per AOTC standard telecommunication wiring to be VoIP. (See 4.6, C.151 Uerizon Service,page 101) 102 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program r t. 5.1 Introduction DCAM and the Administrative Office of the Trial Court began the process of identifying program needs for the Salem Trial Courts with the Salem Courts Master Plan in 2000. Extensive interviews were conducted with judicial staff and departmental representatives of the Superior,District,Juvenile,Housing and Probate and Family Courts,as well as the Law Librarian,District Attorney's Office and the director of operations for the Department of Revenue(DOR)for Essex County.The information was consolidated into a Space Inventory, which was updated in 2006 and refined to reflect the project budget.While the major issues have been agreed upon between DCAM and AOTC,it is should be acknowledged that some further refinement will occur as part of the design process. The purpose of this chapter is to address the functional needs of the court.This information is organized in the following manner: 5.2 Salem Demographics 103 5.3 Building User Descriptions 104 5.4 Description of Court Departments 108 5.5 Programming Process 110 5.6 Recent Trends in Courthouse Design 110 5.7 The Trial Court in Essex County 111 5.8 Space Inventory 113 5.9 Program Changes 139 5.10 Floor Area Calculations 145 5.2 Salem Demographics Incorporated as a town in 1626 and as a city in 1836,Salem is a diverse community with a rich ethnic history,to which people of many races,creeds,colors and origins have contributed over the generations.Even today,Salem services children speaking no less than 20 different languages in its public school system.Long a trading,manufacturing 103 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program and retail center,Salem has been making a slow,and sometimes painful,transition to a service-based economy.The City today serves as the home of Salem State College,the North Shore Medical Center,the Essex County District Superior and Probate Courts,and Registry of Deeds,the world-famous Peabody and Essex Museum,and a host of banks and other financial institutions.It is the educational,medical,legal,cultural and banking hub of the North Shore.(Source:www.mass.gov) Statistically speaking,as of February 2007,the population of Salem is 42,000,13.47% of whom are age 65 or over,and 20.8%of whom are age 18 and younger.The average household income is$57,650.The 2004 median price for a single family home was $223,283;tax rate per$100 is$11.21 residential and$21.33 commercial. 5.3 Building User Descriptions This facility will be used by many different constituents.If their varied needs are taken into consideration during design,they will be able to accomplish their court business making fewer demands on the courts staff for special attention.The Universal Design goal for this building underscores the importance that design decisions provide options for use that serve a diverse population of users. The people who use the courthouse generally fall into five categories: • courts personnel who work in the courthouse; • professionals who work on cases such as defense attorneys and prosecutors;mental health workers;advocates;and mediators • public safety officers including local police and sheriffs; • the general public;and • service providers such as couriers,maintenance vendors,trades people,translators and constables,concession vendors,and child care providers. COURTS PERSONNEL JUDGES The judge symbolizes and carries out the administration of justice.In some courts, such as Superior Court,judges may circulate from one courthouse to another.Judges in District,and Probate&Family Courts generally serve in one location and have traditionally been assigned to a specific courtroom.Except for the larger urban locations,in most juvenile and Housing courts,the judges may serve between two or more locations during the week,due to the number of judges relative to the locations served. In the Salem Trial Court,courtrooms will be shared by circuit and permanently assigned judges.In addition to presiding in court,judges also spend time in their offices reviewing laws,reading cases,preparing opinions and judgments and meeting with court staff and attorneys as well as members of the public. 104 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program COURTHOUSE STAFF The operations of the courts are supported by numerous personnel who help record, process and store official records of all court proceedings. The Clerk Magistrate offices take in various filings and initiate cases by assigning them docket numbers which are the keys to case management.The cases are then processed according to court findings and judgements and all records are stored within the department for access and retrieval. Probation officers meet with their clients,establish goals according to the probationers' terms and needs and supervise their progress for the length of their probation. Associate Court officers provide for weapons and contraband screening at the public entrance,as well as monitoring all public exterior and interior spaces. Court Officers provide personal security for the Judges in the courtrooms as well as intake and monitoring of all detainees who arrive at the courthouse for legal proceedings. Building management personnel provide for the operation,maintenance and upkeep of all building systems required for the comfort,safety and well-being of all of the building occupants. Court interpreters,court reporters,law librarians,computer support technicians and other support personnel round out the non-judicial staffing that keep the court functioning in the most efficient manner. PUBLIC PROFESSIONALS Many attorneys visit the courthouse on a daily basis representing clients,prosecuting cases and filing papers and researching records in the transaction offices.With the increasing use of portable computers and cell phones attorneys are often able to conduct their business from the courthouse. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS The District Attorney(DA)serves as the prosecutor in criminal cases in Superior,District and Juvenile courts.Each DA's office is organized typically by county jurisdiction and generally coincide with the court's jurisdiction.The main activities of the DA staff in the courthouse are as prosecutors within the courtroom and preparatory meetings with victims and witnesses.Additionally,they run a grand jury session in each county at one of the Superior Court locations. Assistant District Attorneys(ADA's)and administrative personnel work at the courthouse and while the judiciary is impartial,the DA,as prosecutor,is not.The DA needs space within the courthouse to meet the day-to-day support for the courtroom activity,however, 105 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program their relationship with the judiciary is one of"arms length'where they must not be perceived by the public as being a part of the judiciary.For this reason,generally the DA has a main office outside of the courthouse and a satellite office for the ADA's and some minimal administrative support staff to work out of at the court facility. PUBLIC DEFENDERS Court Appointed Defense Attorneys—In criminal cases,where the defendant cannot afford their own attorney,the court will appoint a defense attorney to represent them.This service is managed through a combination of contracts with private attorneys to serve as defense and an organized defense bar in several jurisdictions managed under the Committee for Public Counsel Services (CPCS).These attorneys work out of an office outside of the courthouse(to maintain a sense of distance from the system)and they often meet with clients either in an available room or corridor at the courthouse or if the litigant is detained,they may meet them in the central detention area. PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS Local police officers and sheriffs bring defendants to court who have been arrested and kept in custody.They formally turn the care of defendants over to a court officer at the detention area.Police officers also make frequent appearances in court, especially in Arraignment court to answer questions related to an arrest.When they enter the courthouse they are required to remove their guns,leaving them in a secure lockbox. THE GENERAL PUBLIC Many people have never been into a courthouse.For some the only courthouse experience is being called for jury duty.For others,courthouse experience may be limited to a paperwork transaction.Some people,however,spend a good deal of time in courthouses as defendants,litigants,or the families and friends of these parties.This may include children. Many people who visit courthouses are unfamiliar with the judicial system.They may enter the courthouse not understanding why they are there,where they need to go,and what will be expected of them.Those who represent themselves do not have the benefit of an attorney to guide them. JURORS Jurors are"temporary officers of the court"and many serve at some personal sacrifice to perform their civic duty.Many are unfamiliar with the judicial process and appreciate design features that make their time in the courthouse as convenient, comfortable and stress free as possible.Jurors,like the general public,may have personal circumstances that need accommodation.This may include seating options that fit their size and physical condition,the ability to use a cell phone in the building,bringing a service animal with them,and being able to eat at undesignated times.Every juror will be happier 106 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program fulfilling their civic duty if they can easily find parking,easily locate the jury pool,easily find restrooms,drinking fountains,pay phones and food. LITIGANTS Litigants are involved in a court case in some manner and are often accompanied by their attorney when they come to the courthouse. PRO SE LITIGANTS The pro se litigant is self-represented—taking responsibility for their own management of the court business.Due to their unfamiliarity with the system and norms of the court,they often require additional assistance and staff time.Pro se litigants are growing in number,particularly in the Probate and Family Court department. RESEARCHERS The majority of researchers at the courthouse visit the law library to do personal research.They may also visit the transaction offices to view public records. VICTIMS/WITNESSES The majority of victims and witnesses who come to the courthouse are there at the request of the criminal prosecuting ADA.They may be requested to testify either at a grand jury hearing or at a criminal trial or hearing.The ADA will generally escort them through the courthouse and work to ensure that they are safe from an unintended encounter with the perpetrator. Some victims or witnesses may not be involved with the District Attorney but may be concerned for their safety within the courthouse. ADVOCATES Advocates such as"Safe Plait or other social service groups may provide assistance to victims at the courthouse.Although they may not be attorneys,they may provide emotional support and some minimal guidance to the victim to help them find their way through the forms and processes required at the court. PRESS In large court facilities,especially with Superior Court courtrooms,the press is often present on a full-time or close to full-time basis.The presence of the press will greatly increase during a high-profile trial. CLINICIANS/SOCIAL SERVICES Many of the litigants involved in court proceedings may have mental health and substance abuse issues and may need assistance with obtaining social services and other supports to resolve these issues.A number of clinicians support the work of the court providing evaluations ordered by the judge to determine the mental health status of the litigant. 107 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program MEDIATORS The courts are increasingly encouraging litigants to attempt resolution through outside dispute mediation means prior to bringing their case before a judge.The Trial Court funds some mediation programs and often provides space within the courthouse for the mediation.Mediators are certified to help others resolve disputes using professional methods and procedures. 5.4 Description of Court Departments SUPERIOR COURT The Superior Court has general original jurisdiction over most felonies and civil actions, including matters in which equitable relief is sought,and has jurisdiction to review certain administrative decisions. Superior Court proceedings include criminal arraignments and criminal and civil jury trials.Proceedings often require jury courtrooms with access to holding areas.Civil Clerk Magistrates and Criminal Clerk Magistrates hold hearings and manage records,while probation officers monitor offenders. DISTRICT COURT The District Court has been referred to as the`neighborhood court'or`people's court'and serves as many individuals'introduction to the court system.Not all of these new court users are offenders;they may include victims who walk in off the street in urgent need of Court assistance,or persons requesting documents.For these reasons,the District Court should have a welcoming and accessible image,and appear dignified without being forbidding.Design provisions that contribute to this accessible image may include a multi-lingual building directory or information kiosk,and an obvious route and/or clear sightlines between the public entrance and most-used services. The District Court has civil jurisdiction over,among other matters,money damage cases in tort and contract;small claims;summary process;and mental health,alcoholism and drug abuse commitments.The court may also have jurisdiction over evictions and some related matters,and provides judicial review of a number of governmental agency actions such as Attorney General victim compensation decisions and police department firearm license denials. District Court proceedings include criminal arraignments and pre-trial hearings,calendar sessions and motions sessions;criminal and civil jury trials,civil cases,traffic/motor vehicle hearings,and hearings with Clerk Magistrates.Proceedings may take place in courtrooms,formal hearings rooms,and the Clerk Magistrates'offices.Civil Clerk Magistrates and Criminal Clerk Magistrates hold hearings and manage records,while probation officers monitor offenders. 108 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program Superior Court and District Court both hold criminal jury trials and have similar security requirements. PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT The Probate and Family Court Department has jurisdiction over such family-related matters as divorce,separate support,family abuse,custody,and adoptions,as well as wills, trust,guardianships,conservatorships,and name changes. Unlike the District and Superior Courts,Probate and Family Court deals with relatively few persons in custody. For this reason,detainee security needs are not as stringent as for the Juvenile,District,and Superior Court departments.However,because Probate and Family Court has jurisdiction in highly emotional cases involving personal relationships and child custody,it is said to be the most potentially volatile of the court departments.For this reason,court officers in the Probate and Family Court have as great or greater need than in other Trial Courts to monitor the courtrooms and public areas for potential interactions between parties. Formal proceedings of the Probate and Family Court take place in courtrooms.Much dispute intervention takes place in the Probation Department,where probation officers have an active role in fact-finding,evaluation and negotiation.The Register of Probate manages court records. Judges of the Probate and Family Court tend to preside over less formal and more`intimate' hearings than the proceedings of the other Trial Court departments. JUVENILE COURT The Juvenile Court Department handles criminal and civil matters concerning defendants 17 years old or younger and civil matters such as the care and protection of children and termination of parental rights.This department serves a distinctly different population from the other Trial Court departments.For reasons of confidentiality,Juvenile Court proceedings are closed to the public. The Juvenile Court requires courtrooms and hearing/conference rooms.Clerk Magistrates and probation officers manage court records and monitor offenders. HOUSING COURT The Housing Court has jurisdiction over use of real property as it affects the health, welfare,and safety of residents,users,and the general public.Housing Court also has jurisdiction over Small Claims.A circuit judge and visiting Housing Specialists presently 109 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program serve the Essex County Housing Court,with sessions in Salem held on Tuesday mornings. The Master Plan program anticipates a full time Housing Court presence in Salem. The Housing Court functions require access to courtrooms,hearing rooms and mediation rooms.Clerk Magistrates and Housing Specialists conduct business at a transaction counter or in private meetings with litigants. 5.5 Programming Process DCAM first began to develop the program for the Salem Trial Courts as part of the original master planning effort.Ricci Associates conducted interviews with Trial Court staff, administrators and judges.Through this effort,and with projected staffing numbers given to DCAM by AOTC,a program spreadsheet was developed and refined.This spreadsheet has been reviewed and updated over the past five years to keep numbers current,and while it is to be considered in the final stages,it is anticipated that some adjustments will be made in schematic design. 5.6 Recent Trends in Court Design Society underwent significant change in the 20th century,and in the 21st century the courts are adapting to meet changing needs.Some of these changes affect space needs in court facilities.The following list identifies some of the recent trends that have come to redefine how justice is administered and how facilities are designed for the courts: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION An increasing number of disputes are being settled outside the courtroom through various forms of alternative dispute resolution.The court system is currently being planned with additional space for court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution. UN-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS With the rising costs of legal services and decreased funding for legal services for indigent litigants,more litigants are appearing in court without lawyers.For this reason, courthouses must include clear signage,properly equipped information booths,electronic information systems,and access to legal resources. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The many technological innovations over the past decade have provided court users with more options for carrying out court business.Videoconferencing,video arraignments, electronic tracking of cases,and closed-circuit TV are now available and utilized with varying degrees of success throughout the system.For the future,court users will be able to file cases remotely and at more than one location.Technological solutions are encouraged because they make efficient use of resources. 110 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program SOCIAL SERVICES In recent years,trial courts have accepted increased responsibility for responding to social problems which litigants present.These problems include erosion of the traditional family, domestic violence,and substance abuse.Courts have begun to refer parties to programs such as parent education for divorcing parents,anger management,and substance abuse treatment.Many of these programs,particularly self-help recovery groups may take place right in the courthouse and need to be accommodated,with appropriate security arrangements.As to others,space is needed for an increased information and referral capacity. INCREASED SECURITY REQUIREMENTS: Enhanced courthouse security has become a major element in the design and renovation of the Commonwealths court facilities. Increased security needs can be met operationally by trained personnel and architecturally by means of separate entry points(public and secure) and separate internal circulation paths,along with electronic surveillance methods such as cameras,duress alarms and video monitoring. 5.7 The Trial Court in Essex County Essex County has court facilities in seven communities.Salem,traditionally the seat of Essex County,has sessions for Superior(both civil and criminal),District,Probate& Family,Juvenile and Housing matters.Other sessions are held in Lawrence(Superior, District,Probate&Family,Juvenile and Housing),Newburyport(Superior,District,Probate &Family),Haverhill(District),Peabody(District),Gloucester(District)and Lynn(District, Juvenile,and Housing on a circuit basis).The District Court in Ipswich was merged into the Newburyport District Court in 2004. 111 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 112 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 5.8 Space Inventory PAGE 115-137 113 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 114 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 Revision Date: 11.28.06 DCAM Reviewed by GRR Approved By: Date: SALEM Trial Court Space Inventory Space Summary Total Total Net Dept. Dept. Staff Staff Square Gross Gross Program Area Existing Projected Feet Factor Sq.Ft Notes Courtroom Sets 34.456 1.15 39,624 Judicial Offices 21.5 36 7.024 1.25 8.780 Transaction Offices 118 148 23,928 33,499 Superior Court 34 42 6,491 9,087 Clerk Magistrate 20 22 3,717 1.40 5,204 Probation 14 20 2,774 1.40 3,884 District Court 49 61 9,583 13,416 Clerk Magistrate 23 26 5,262 1.40 7,367 Probation 26 35 4,321 1.40 6,049 Probate&Family Court in separate building Register of Probate Probation Juvenile Court 19 29 5,303 7,424 Clerk Magistrate 10 13 2,801 1.40 3,921 Probation 9 16 2,502 1.40 3,503 Housing Court 16 16 2,551 1.40 3,571 Court Support 22 2 12,349 16,743 Central Detainee Holding 3,560 1.75 6,230 Court OMcers 22 2 390 1.10 429 Jury Pool 2,415 1.10 2,657 Trial Court Secure Wailing Area 0 0 120 1.25 150 Interpreter Services 200 1.10 220 Court Reporters 200 1.10 220 Public Lobby 0 0 4,134 1.30 5,374 Staff Support 1,330 1.10 1,463 Court Operations 0 0 6,985 7,684 Law Library 1 1 6,985 1.10 7,684 Supplemental Operations 25 29 4,870 6,163 District Attorney 24 28 2,390 1.30 3,107 Grand Jury 1,460 1.30 1,898 Attorneys'Room 150 1.10 165 Police Prosecutors'Room 150 1.10 165 Alternative Dispute Resolu9on 0 0 - 1.15 - Adult Court Clinic 0 0 360 1.15 414 Juvenile Court Clinic 1 1 360 1.15 414 Child Care Center 0 0 - 1.25 - Social Services - 1.10 - DOR-Child Support 1.30 - Building Support 0 0 4,504 1.25 5,630 TOTALSTAFF 187 215 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 94,116 TOTAL DEPARTMENT GROSS SQUARE FEET 118,123 BUILDING MECHANICAL @ 10%DGSF (was 8%) 11,812 SUBTOTAL 129,935 BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 1.35 TOTAL BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FEET 175,412 %NET TO GROSS 54 GSF/COURTROOM 14688 %SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS 8% `GSF Is Subtotal of the building sf(before grossing factor)minus Supplemental Operations and Court Operations divided by the number of courtrooms SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 1 115 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 COURTROOM SETS Data Sheet Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Notes Courtrooms Superior Court 1.1 X-Large Jury Courtroom w/detainee dock 1 2,500 2,500 1.2 Large Jury Courtroom 3 2,000 6,000 Subtotal 4 8,500 District Court 1.1 X-Large Non-Jury Courtroom w/detainee dock 1 2,500 2,500 1.2 Large Jury Courtroom w/detainee dock 1 2,000 2,000 1.2 Medium Jury Courtroom 2 1,600 3,200 Subtotal 4 7,700 Probate&Family Court 1.3 Large Non-Jury Courtroom in separate building 1.3 Medium Non-Jury Courtroom 1.3 Small Non-Jury Courtroom Subtotal 0 Juvenile Court 1.2 Medium Jury Courtroom 1 1,600 1,600 1.3 Medium Non-Jury Courtroom 0 1,600 - 1.2 Small Jury Courtroom 1 1,200 1,200 Subtotal 2 2,800 Housing Court 1.2 Large Jury Courtroom 1 2,000 2,000 Subtotal 1 2,000 Total Courtrooms 11 21,000 Courtroom Support 6.1 Off-bench Judge's Conf.Room 3 160 480 Added 1 and changed back to 160 1.14 Courtroom Entrance Vestibule 11 80 880 1.15 Waiting Area-X-Large Courtrooms 2 400 800 1.15 Waiting Area-all Juvenile Courtrooms 2 400 800 1.15 Waiting Area-Large Courtrooms 4 300 1,200 1.15 Waiting Area-Med.Courtrooms 3 200 600 1.15 Waiting Area-Small Courtrooms 0 200 - 6.1 Pre-Trial Conference Room 22 120 2,640 2 1.16 A/V Storage 11 30 330 1.17 Evidence Vault 11 50 550 Subtotal 8,280 Courtroom Holding Area 3 1.19 Detainee Staging 5 50 250 1.19 Detainee Soundlock 5 40 200 1.19 Detainee Holding Cell(group) 5 150 750 1.19 Detainee Holding Cell(indiv.) 5 70 350 1.14 Detainee Dock 80 - within courtroom space 4 Subtotal 20 390 1,550 Jun,Deliberation Areas 5 1.20 Jury Deliberation Room 7 300 2,100 1.20 Vestibulew/toilets 7 200 1,400 1.2 Court Officers'Alcove 3 42 126 6 Subtotal 3,626 Total NSF-Courtroom Sets 34,456 Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 39,624 SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 2 116 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 Notes: 1.Based on one per two courtrooms or distance from courtroom to collegial suite.This includes 30sf toilet. 2.Two per courtroom.In Superior Court only,1 or 2 of these may be utilized by court reporters as shared workspace.Refer to Court Reporter section on page 14 for additional information. 3.Detainee area shared between courtrooms.There is also a holding area at the Grand Jury(refer to pg 17) Only Arraignment courtrooms require 2 holding cells in core-smaller can have 1. 4. Included in all Arraignment courtrooms,1 large SC courtroom and 1 DC standard courtroom 5.Ratio of Jury Deliberation Areas:Less than four courtrooms=1:1.More than four courtrooms=1:.75 6.One per two Jury Deliberation Areas 7.Group detainee holding cells located next to Island 2nd session and X-large Superior Court courtroom.Number of group holding cells depends on adjacency to each core.If 1st session,2nd session and X-large Superior Courtrooms share a core,then 2 group cells between them will suffice.If any of the named courtrooms share a core with other courtrooms,2 group cells will be required and no individual cells. All other shared cores will have 2 individuals cells. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 3 117 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 JUDICIAL OFFICES Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff Superior Court 3 2.1 Judge 3 4 4 330 1,320 1 4.2 Judicial Secretary 1 2 2 80 160 4.2 Law Clerk 4 4 4 48 192 reduced from 64 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 3 4 4 120 480 4.1 Head Administrative Assistant 0 1 1 100 100 reduced from 120 Total SC Judicial Staff 11 15 15 2,252 District Court 2.1 Judge 4 4 4 330 1,320 1 4.2 Judicial Secretary 2 2 2 80 160 4.1 Head Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 100 100 reduced from 120 4.1 Law Clerk 0 2 2 48 96 reduced from 64 Subtotal 7 9 9 1,676 Probate&Family Court in separate building Juvenile Court 2.1 Judge 1.5 2 2 330 660 1 4.2 Judicial Secretary 1 2 2 80 160 4.2 Law Clerk 0 2 1 48 48 reduced from 64 4.1 Head Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 100 100 reduced from 120 Subtotal 3.5 7 968 Housing Court 2.1 Judge 0 1 1 330 330 1 4.2 Judicial Secretary 0 1 1 80 80 4.2 Law Clerk 0 1 0 48 - Subtotal 0 3 410 Visiting Judge 2.1 Judge 0 2 2 330 660 reduced to 1 unit,9/28106 increased back to 2 units Total SCIDCIJCIHC Judicial Staff 21.5 36 5,966 Support 2 3.1 Entry&waiting (was 120) 1 80 80 was 100 3.1 Reception Desk (was 64) 1 48 48 6.1 Library/Conference 1 300 300 6.1 Staff Conference Room (combined library/conf) 1 200 200 restored conf.room 5.2 Equipment Room 1 80 80 5.2 Supply Room 1 80 80 5.1 File Room 3 80 240 added 2 for a total of 3 7.22 Kitchenette 1 30 30 Subtotal 1,058 Total NSF-Judicial Offices 7,024 Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 Department Gross Square Feet 8,780 Notes: 1.Includes 30sf toilet and 10sf coat closet 2.Support area to be located within shared(DC/PFC/JC/HC)judicial suite area with circulation capacity to SC judicial offices If judicial offices are spanning multiple floors,shared support spaces should be evaluated to determine if any duplication is necessary. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 4 118 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 3.Superior Court judicial offices to be located adjacent to SC courtrooms;all other judicial offices can be arranged in collegial suites 4. Law Clerk and Judicial Sectretary may be located near but not directly adjeacent to SC Judge's Lobby SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 5 119 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES SUPERIOR COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 (reduced from 200) 4.1 1st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 140 140 reduced from 150 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 2 2 80 160 4.2 Clerical 17 18 18 64 1,152 Subtotal 20 22 1,632 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 3 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 6.1 Staff Conference Room 1 300 300 include conf rm,share w/Prob 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 1,000 1,000 5 5.1 Evidence Room 1 100 100 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 7 Subtotal 2,085 Total NSF- Superior Court Clerk Magistrate 3,717 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 (was 1.45) Department Gross Square Feet 5,204 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) Note:initial 20 sf/person includes display space for fors,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Additional evidence(i.e.large items)may need to be stored in locked area in basement(storage cage?) 7.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 6 120 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES SUPERIOR COURT:Probation Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Chief Probation Officer 1 1 180 180 (reduced from 200) 4.1 1st Assistant Chief Probation Officer 0 1 1 140 140 reduced from 150 4.1 Assistant Chief Probation Officer 1 1 1 140 140 reduced from 150 4.1 Probation Officer 7 8 8 100 800 reduced from 120 4.2 Associate Probation Officer 1 2 2 80 160 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 0 1 1 80 80 4.2 Clerical 4 6 6 64 384 Subtotal 14 20 1,884 Sunoort 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 200 200 3 6.1 Staff Conference Room 0 0 - (share conf rm with derk) 6.1 Interview Room/Intake 1 120 120 reduced due to office space 3.2 Drug Testing Toilet Room w/storage 1 80 80 provided for interview use 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 200 200 5 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 6 Subtotal 890 Total NSF-Superior Court Probation 2,774 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 (was 1.45) Department Gross Square Feet 3,884 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. Note:initial 20 sf/person includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 10 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) 4.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf.Locate adjacent to intake rooms. 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 7 121 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES DISTRICT COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 (reduced from 200) 4.1 1st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 0 1 1 140 140 reduced from 150 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 5 5 5 120 600 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 1 1 80 80 4.2 Clerical 16 18 18 64 1,152 Subtotal 23 26 2,152 Support 9 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 300 300 (reduced to 300) 3 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 6.2 Hearing Room 2 300 600 4 6.1 Staff Conference Room 1 200 200 share with Probation 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 1,500 1,500 6 5.1 Evidence Room 1 100 100 7.19 Breakroom(shared) B Subtotal 3,110 Total NSF- District Court Clerk Magistrate 5,262 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 (was 1.45) Department Gross Square Feet 7,367 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 25 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) Note:initial 20 sf/person includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.Assumes 15 people at 20 sf/person./Assumes large hearings to be conducted in Housing Court ctrm 4 days/wk when Housing Court is not in session:pending agreement between the two depts;re-evaluate if not agreed upon 5.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 6.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 7.Additional evidence(i.e.large items)may need to be stored in locked area in basement(storage cage?) 8.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information 9.Central cashier has moved to public lobby support functions for future use by all depts.Each transaction counter will need a small safe to handle cash transactions in the departments SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 8 122 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES DISTRICT COURT:Probation Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Chief Probation Officer 1 1 1 180 180 (reduced from 200) 4.1 1 st Assistant Chief Probation Officer 0 1 1 140 140 reduced from 150 4.1 Assistant Chief Probation Officer 2 4 4 140 560 " 4.1 Probation Officer 13 15 15 100 1,500 reduced from 120 4.2 Associate Probation Officer 2 4 4 80 320 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 1 1 80 80 4.2 Clerical 7 9 9 64 576 Subtotal 26 35 3,356 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 6.1 Staff Conference Room 200 - (share w/Clerk) 6.1 Interview Room/Intake 1 120 120 reduced due to office space 3.2 Drug Testing Toilet Room w/storage 1 80 80 provided for interview use 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 200 200 reduced from 150 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 6 Subtotal 965 Total NSF-District Court Probation 4,321 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 (was 1.45) Department Gross Square Feet 6,049 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) 4.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual 8 projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 9 123 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES JUVENILE COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 4.1 1st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 0 0 0 140 - 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 120 120 PO Workstation/Interview Rms 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 2 2 80 160 4.2 Clerical 7 9 9 64 576 Subtotal 10 13 1,036 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 3 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 6.2 Hearing Room 1 300 300 4 6.1 Staff Conference Room 1 200 200 Share with Probation 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 was 130 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 added back 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 500 500 6 5.1 Evidence Room 1 80 80 reduced from 150;sm.dept. 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 8 Subtotal 1,765 Total NSF- Juvenile Court Clerk Magistrate 2,801 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 Department Gross Square Feet 3,921 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if 510 people add 15 sf/person) Note:initial 20 sf/person includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.Assumes 15 people at 20 sf/person 5.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depls with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 6.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 7.Additional evidence(i.e.large items)may need to be stored in locked area in basement(storage cage?) 8.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 10 124 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES JUVENILE COURT:Probation Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Chief Probation Officer 1 1 1 180 180 4.1 1 st Assistant Chief Probation Officer 0 1 1 140 140 reduced from 150 4.1 Assistant Chief Probation Officer 1 2 2 140 280 " 4.1 Probation Officer 6 7 7 100 700 reduced from 120 4.2 Associate Probation Officer 0 1 1 80 80 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 0 1 1 80 80 4.2 Clerical 1 3 3 64 192 Subtotal 9 16 1,652 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 200 200 3 6.1 Staff Conference Room 0 200 - Share w/Clerk 6.1 Interview Room/Intake 1 120 120 was 2 3.2 Drug Testing Toilet Room w/storage 1 80 80 5.2 Equipment Room 1 80 80 reduced from 100-small dept. 5.2 Supply Room 1 80 80 added back 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 200 200 reduced from 300 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 6 Subtotal 850 Total NSF-Juvenile Court Probation 2,502 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 Department Gross Square Feet 3,503 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) 4.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual 8 projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 11 125 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 TRANSACTION OFFICES HOUSING COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes VERIFY STAFFING Staff AT THIS LOCATION! 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 was 200 4.1 1st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 140 140 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 120 120 4.1 Chief Housing Specialist 1 1 1 180 180 was 200 4.2 Housing Specialist 6 6 6 80 480 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 2 2 2 80 160 4.2 Clerical 4 4 4 64 256 Subtotal 16 16 1,516 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 1,2 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 3 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 6.2 Hearing Room 0 300 - 6.1 Mediation Room 2 150 300 6.1 Staff Conference Room 0 200 - 5.2 Equipment Room/Supply(combined) 1 100 100 small department 5.2 Supply Room 0 100 - 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 150 150 small department 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 5 Subtotal 1,035 Total NSF- Housing Court Clerk Magistrate 2,551 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 Department Gross Square Feet 3,571 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 25 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) Note:initial 20 sf/person includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 5.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 12 126 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 COURT SUPPORT CENTRAL DETAINEE HOLDING Data and COURT OFFICERS Sheet Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Notes Adult Central Detainee Holding 3 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Male) 3 150 450 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Male) 7 70 490 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Female) 2 150 300 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Female) 3 70 210 7.4 Observation Cell 1 70 70 Total Adult Cells 16 1,520 Juvenile Central Detainee Holding 3 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Male Juvenile) 1 150 150 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Male Juvenile) 1 70 70 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Female Juvenile) 1 150 150 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Female Juvenile) 1 70 70 7.4 Observation Cell 1 70 70 Total Juvenile Cells 5 510 Detainee Holding Support 7.2 Detainee Staging Area 1 200 200 7.2 Detainee Entry Trap(w/double door) 2 40 80 minimum 2 for egress 7.3 Control Room 1 200 200 7.21 Staff Toilet 1 50 50 1 7.6 Property Storage Closet 1 80 80 10.15 Shower/Janitor Closet 1 30 30 7.5 Attorney Waiting Area 1 30 30 7.5 Attorney-Client Conference(Accessible) 2 80 160 increased to 2 7.3 Transport Officer's Room 1 100 100 Reduced to 100 9/28106 7.1 Vehicle Sallyport 1 600 600 includes gunlocker Subtotal 0 0 1,530 Total NSF•Detainee Holding 3,560 Departmental Gross Factor 1.75 Department Gross Square Feet 6,230 Court Officer's Area Staff 4.1 Chief Court Officer 2 2 2 120 240 Reduced to 100 9128/06 7.19 Court Officers'Break Room 20 0 1 150 150 reduced to 150 Subtotal 22 2 390 Total NSF-Court Officers'Area 390 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 429 Notes: 1.Adjacent to Control Room. 2.C.0's share one room;includes kitchenette.Staffing:2 per ctrm,3 at entry,1 ACO per floor,1 CO in detention plus growth. (2/CR=11+3/entry+4 @1 per fir.+detention+2 Ch.CO+1=22) 3.Number of holding cells to be determined by the custody count at each location 4.Within or directly adjacent to control room 5.One conference room for every 6 cells. 6. Located as close to control room as possible. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 13 127 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 COURT SUPPORT JURY POOL,TRIAL COURT SECURE WAITING AREA INTERPRETER SERVICES and COURT REPORTERS Data Sheet Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Notes Jury Pool 7.7 Jury Check-in area 1 100 100 7.7 Jury Waiting Area 1 2,160 2,160 7.7 A/V Storage Closet 1 15 15 !nor.back to 2160 for full prog. 7.7 Jury Toilets 2 50 100 7.7 Vending alcove 1 30 30 7.7 Public Telephone alcove 1 10 10 Subtotal 2,415 Total NSF-Jury Pool 2,415 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 2,657 7.8 Trial Court Secure Waiting Area 2 Staff 4.1 Office 0 0 1 120 120 locate at entry 4.2 Receptionist 0 0 0 80 - Subtotal 0 0 120 Support 7.8 Waiting/Play Area 0 7.14 Toilet 0 50 7.22 Kitchenette 6.1 Conference Room Subtotal Total NSF-Secure Waiting Area 120 Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 Department Gross Square Feet 150 Interpreter Services 7.9 Office area 1 200 200 3 Total NSF•Interpreter Services 200 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 220 Court Reporters 7.10 Office area 1 200 200 3 Total NSF-Court Reporters 200 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 220 Notes: 1.Accommodates 100 persons,as follows:Provide a 70/30 split between chair seating and table seating. Chair seating for 70 persons @ 15 sf/person;tables for 30 persons @ 25 sf/person=1,800sf Size to be adjusted based on actual#ofjurors from Jury Commissioner;if>100 persons,add 15 sf/person 2.This area should be located adjacent to main entry 3.Shared workspace off of public circulation. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 14 128 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 COURT SUPPORT PUBLIC LOBBY and STAFF SUPPORT Data Sheet Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Notes Public Lobby 7.11 Weather Vestibule 1 200 200 1 7.12 Security Screening&Queuing Area 1 200 200 2 7.11 Information Desk 1 64 64 7.11 Lobby 1 3,000 3,000 7.13 Concession/Vending/Storage 1 150 150 Subtotal 3,614 Public Lobby Support Functions 7.16 Main Entry Security Office 1 150 150 (Reduced to 150) 7 7.17 Police Room 1 120 120 reduced to 120 7.18 Central Cashier 1 150 150 6 TBD Server Room 1 100 100 Reduced to 100 Subtotal 520 Total NSF-Public Areas 4,134 Departmental Gross Factor 1.30 Department Gross Square Feet 5,374 Staff Support 7.19 Staff Breakroom w/kitchenette 3 200 600 (Inc.to 3-HC can share) 3,4 7.20 Staff Female Shower/Lockers/Toilet 1 230 230 reduced from 300)5,8 7.20 Staff Male Shower/Lockers/Toilet 1 500 500 (reduced from 900)5,8 Subtotal 1,330 Total NSF-Staff Support 1,330 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.30) Department Gross Square Feet 1,463 Notes: 1.200sf minimum 2.Includes 2 security screening stations.200sf min is placeholder;needs to be increased;pending further research 3.Assumes 200sf to serve approx.45-50 staff. 4.Breakrooms should be conveniently located in a neutral area so that they can be easily shared. Assumes shared use by departments;Exception:where staff exceeds 45-50 people,provide designated breakroom 5.#of lockers will be determined by number of staff. ASSUME 80 lockers and 1,200 SF for the study(32 CO's for courtrooms(2x16 courtrooms)+6(3 @ each entrance x2)+10(1/floor new facility,1/floor PFC)+19 Maintenance Staff=66+10+76+4 growth=80(Based on 1 per court officer/1 permaintenance staff +10 addl court staff) (#CO+#maintenance+10 court staff)=#staff x 15sf/person=sf(distr.appropriately between male&female lockers)=80 x 15SF=1200SF 6.Note:must be accessible from both public and staff circulation 7.Gunlocker housed inside security office. 8.Court Officer(CO)and Assistnal Court Officers(ACO)shall have full sized lockers.Maintenance staff and all other staff to have half sized lockers.Maintenance staff lockers shall be separate and located near maintenance offices/floor.Another staff to share with CO and ACO. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 15 129 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 COURT OPERATIONS Data LAW LIBRARY Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Head Law Librarian 1 1 1 150 150 DELETE PROGRAM 4.1 Reference Librarian 1 1 1 100 100 reduced to 100,9/28/06 4.1 Law Library Assistant 3 3 1 100 100 reduced to 100,9128106 Subtotal 5 5 350 Library Service Area 8.1 Public Entrance 1 100 100 7 8.1 Stand-up Public Access Computers 5 15 75 2-3 computers 8.1 Reference Computer Stations 6 60 360 3 computers 8.1 Public Use Equipment Alcove 1 90 90 Support 8.1 Reference/Circulation Desk 1 200 200 8.1 Collections 1 2,500 2,500 1 8.1 Historic Collections 1 1,500 1,500 1 8.1 Current Periodicals 1 150 150 8.1 Tables/Chairs 15 30 450 reduced to 30,9/28/06 8.1 Computer Workstations 5 30 150 reduced to 30,9/28/06 8.1 Microfilm/fiche Center 1 90 90 3 6.1 Multi-Media Conference Room 1 300 300 8.1 Technical Services Area 1 500 500 4 5.2 Supply Room 1 80 80 8 TBD Server Room 1 40 40 7.21 Staff Toilet 1 50 50 5 Subtotal 6,635 Total NSF.Law Library 6,985 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 Department Gross Square Feet 7,684 Notes: 1.Confirm collection space needs with Trial Court Law Librarian;sf does not include aisles-they are in grossing factor 2.Computer Workstations @ 60sf per workstation. 3.Assumes 1 microfiche reading station and 2 microfilm storage cabinets @ 2'Wx4'L. 4.Includes 300sf storage 5.Public toilet needs to be nearby or adjacent. 6.Can be located in technical services within view or near circulation desk.A glass wall can provide viewing access. 7.Integrate display area into public entry. 8.Located near technical service area. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 16 130 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS DISTRICT ATTORNEY,GRAND JURY Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes District Attorney Staff 4.1 Chief DA Prosecutor 0 0 0 120 - 4.1 Supervising DA 1 1 1 120 120 4.2 Asst.DA's 10 10 10 64 640 reduced from 80 4.2 Victim[Witness Advocates 5 8 8 48 384 reduced from 64 4.2 Support/Clerical 5 6 6 48 288 reduced from 64 4.2 Interns 3 3 3 36 108 reduced from 42 Subtotal 24 28 1,540 Support 9.1 Reception/Waiting Area 1 100 100 reduced from 120 9.1 VictimlWitness Waiting 1 120 120 added per Taunton 9.1 Victim[Witness Conference Room 2 120 240 7.14 Toilets 2 50 100 6.1 Conference/Library 200 - (can use grand jury) 5.2 EquipmenV Supply Room 1 80 80 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 150 150 7.22 Kitchenette 1 30 30 TBD Server/Telephone room 1 30 30 3 Subtotal 850 Total NSF-District Attorney 2,390 Departmental Gross Factor 1.30 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 3,107 Grand Jury Support 9.3 Reception/Waiting 1 100 100 reduced to 100,9-28-06 9.3 Victim/Witness Waiting Area 1 120 120 6.1 Public Conference Room 2 120 240 9.3 Grand Jury Room 1 900 900 7.14 Toilets 2 50 100 7.22 Kitchenette 0 30 - 5.2 EquipmenV Supply Room 1 Subtotal 1,460 Total NSF-Grand Jury 1,460 Departmental Gross Factor 1.30 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 1,898 SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 17 131 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 Notes: 1.Shared Space:refer to District Attorney Support 2. This space is only staffed when Grand Jury is in session. SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 18 132 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS'ROOM and POLICE PROSECUTORS'ROOM Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes 9.2 Attornev's Room 1 150 150 Subtotal 150 Total NSF-Attorney's Room 150 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 165 9.9 Police Prosecutors'Room 1 150 150 Subtotal 150 Total NSF-Police Prosecutors'Room 150 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 165 SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 19 133 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION and COURT CLINIC Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes 9.4 Alternative Dispute Resolution Staff 4.1 Office 0 0 0 120 4.2 Clerical 0 0 0 64 Subtotal 0 0 Support 9.4 Waiting Area 0 120 6.1 Mediation Room 0 150 6.1 Conference Room 0 200 5.2 Equipment]SupplyRoom 0 80 Subtotal Total NSF-Alternative Dispute Resolution Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 was 1.3 Department Gross Square Feet 9.5 Adult Court Clinic:(SC,DC) Staff 4.1 Clinician's Office 0 0 1 120 120 4.1 Social Worker 0 0 1 120 120 Subtotal 0 0 2 240 Support 9.5 Reception/Waiting Area 1 120 120 Subtotal 120 Total NSF-Adult Court Clinic 360 Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 (was 1.25) Department Gross Square Feet 414 9.5 Juvenile Court Clinic Need to check staffing and requirements for Salem Staff 4.1 Clinician's Office 1 1 1 120 120 4.1 Social Worker 0 0 1 120 120 Subtotal 1 1 240 Support 9.5 Reception/Waiting Area 1 120 120 added per Taunton Subtotal 120 Total NSF-Juvenile Court Clinic 360 Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 (was 1.3) Department Gross Square Feet 414 SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 20 134 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS CHILDCARE CENTER and SOCIAL SERVICES Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Childcare Center 1 Staff 4.1 Director's Office 0 0 0 120 Subtotal Support 9.6 Reception/Waiting Area 0 240 2 9.6 Multi-Purpose Room 0 1,000 9.6 Laundry/Kitchenette 0 30 9.6 Storage Closet 0 50 7.14 Toilet 0 50 3 Subtotal Total NSF-Childcare Center Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 was 1.3 Department Gross Square Feet 9.7 Social Services 4 Shared Workroom/Conference Room 0 150 Subtotal Total NSF-Social Services Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 was 1.3 Department Gross Square Feet Notes: 1.Childcare Center must be located at grade level for emergency egress. 2.Includes interview alcoves and a reception desk. 3.1 toilet for staff/1 toilet for children 4.Social services may include the following entities:CASA SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 21 135 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 2nd DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS Data DEPARTMENT of REVENUE-Child Support Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Regional Counsel 120 4.2 Counsel 80 4.2 Child Support Worker 64 4.2 Clerical 64 Subtotal Support 9.8 Transaction Counter/Service 90 9.8 Transaction Waiting Space 150 9.8 Interview Room 150 5.2 Equipment/Supply Room 80 Subtotal Total NSF-Department of Revenue:Child Support Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 was 1.3 Department Gross Square Feet Notes: 1.DOR area must be located near an area that can handle overflow waiting. 2.Assumes 10 people,based on 200 sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 22 136 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program tin DRAFT for Review 11/28/06 BUILDING SUPPORT Data Sheet Staff Staff Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Building Manager 0 0 1 120 4.2 Building System Manager Office 320 moved from support below 4.3 Clerical 0 0 1 64 64 Subtotal 0 0 504 (assume exterior parking) Support 4 10.1 Judge's parking 350 - Exterior pkg if possible? 10.1 Secure Staff Parking 350 Exterior pkg if possible? 10.2 Security Equipment Sever Room 0 120 Moved to Public Lobby 10.3 Central I.T.Computer Room 1 200 200 reduced from 250 10.4 Central Mail Room 1 150 150 10.5 Loading Dock/Receiving Area 1 800 800 (reduced loading from 1000) 10.6 Maintenance Equipment Storage 1 300 300 10.7 Maintenance Shop 1 300 300 10.8 Outdoor Equipment Storage 1 500 500 10.9 Trash/Recycling Room 1 300 300 (was 200,changed to 300) 10.10 Janitorial Supply Room 1 300 300 10.11 Bicycle Storage Room 0 120 Exterior storage 10.12 Telephone Room 1 150 150 added per MH 10.13 Inactive Records Storage 1 1000 1,000 3 Subtotal 4,000 Total NSF-Building Support 4,504 Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 Department Gross Square Feet 5,630 Notes: 1.Confirm with specific site and project requirements;parking based on#ofjudges+#of Chief CM/Chief PO+1-2 addt'I each 2.This should be approx 350sf per space if double-loaded arrangement. 3.Minimum 500sf to accommodate storage boxes. 4.The following builidng support spaces are included in the Grossing Factor for the building: Life Safety Equipment Room Switchgear Room Tel/Data Closets Electrical Closets/Emergency Elec Rm Generator Room Janitorial Supply Closets Elevator Machine Room Fire Pump Room SALEM FULL PROGRAM New Grossing Factors 23 137 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 138 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 5.9 Program Changes PAGE 141-144 139 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 140 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program MEMORANDUM Division of Capital Asset Management Office of Planning, Design and Construction One Ashburton Place, 15"'Floor Boston,Massachusetts 02108 (617)727-4050/FAX(617)727-6060 To: Liz Minnis, Director,CFU From: Gail Rosenberg, Project Manager Cc: DCAM: Elayne Campos AOTC: Michael Jordan, Michael Hayes, Richard L'Heureux Date: November 28,2006 Re: Changes made to Salem Full Program, 11/28/06(SC/DC/JC/HC) Below are changes made to the Salem Program, by department and page,following review of AOTC's comments on the draft submitted to them dated 11/06/06. Incorporated into this draft are additions which were requested,offset by some square footage decisions made by DCAM. This resulted in a total gross building square footage of 176,410 GSF,which is within the 177,000 GSF we have established as the goal for the project. COURTROOM SETS p.3 Off—bench Judges Conference Room—increased to 160 SF(from reduction to 120) p.3 Off—bench Judges Conference Room—increased quantity from 2 to 3 (Note: Detainee docks to be carried in courtroom SF) JUDICIAL OFFICES p.5 SC-Law Clerks—reduced from 64 to 48 SF SC-Head Administrative Assistant—reduced to 100 from 120 DC-Law Clerks—reduced from 64 to 48 SF DC-Head Administrative Assistant—reduced to 100 from 120 JC-Law Clerks—reduced from 64 to 48 SF JC-Head Administrative Assistant—reduced to 100 from 120 HC-Law Clerks—reduced from 64 to 48 SF HC-Head Administrative Assistant—reduced to 100 from 120 Visiting Judge's Lobby—increased quanity from 1 to 2 Support—reduced Entry and waiting from 100 SF to 80 Restored Staff Conference Room @ 200 SF Increase File Room quantity from 1 to 3 @ 80 SF(4 requested, but Housing Court is small presence here) Page 1 3/8/2007 141 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES—SUPERIOR COURT CLERK MAGISTRATE p.7 SC Clerk Magistrate—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF SC 1st Asst.Clerk Magistrate—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Staff Conference Room—added back in, 1 @ 300 SF to be shared with Probation TRANSACTION OFFICES—SUPERIOR COURT PROBATION p.8 Chief Probation Officer—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF 1st Asst. Chief Probation Officer—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Asst.Chief Probation Officer—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Probation Officers—reduced to 80 SF(with use of interview rooms) Staff Conference Room—to be shared with Clerk's Office 2 Additional Interview Room added (for a total of 3 for 8 PO's) TRANSACTION OFFICES—DISTRICT COURT CLERK MAGISTRATE p.9 DC Clerk Magistrate—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF DC 1"Asst.Clerk Magistrate—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Staff Conference Room—added back in, 1 @ 200 SF to be shared with Probation TRANSACTION OFFICES—DISTRICT COURT PROBATION p.10 Chief Probation Officer—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF 1st Asst.Chief Probation Officer—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Asst.Chief Probation Officer—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Probation Officers—reduced to 80 SF(with use of interview rooms) Staff Conference Room—to be shared with Clerk's Office Additional Interview Rooms added (for a total of 5 for 15 PO's) TRANSACTION OFFICES—JUVENILE COURT CLERK MAGISTRATE p.11 JC Clerk Magistrate—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF Staff Conference Room—added back in, 1 @ 200 SF to be shared with Probation Supply Room—added back in, 1 @ 100 SF Evidence Room—reduced from 150 to 100 SF TRANSACTION OFFICES—JUVENILE COURT PROBATION p.12 Chief Probation Officer—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF 1st Asst. Chief Probation Officer—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Asst.Chief Probation Officer—reduced from 150 to 140 SF Probation Officers—reduced to 80 SF(with use of interview rooms) Staff Conference Room—to be shared with Clerk's Office 1 Additional Interview Room added (for a total of 3 for 7 PO's) Page 2 3/8/2007 142 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES—HOUSING COURT CLERK MAGISTRATE p.13 HC Clerk Magistrate—remains reduced from 200 to 180 SF Equipment/Supply(combined)Room—added back in, 1 @ 100 SF (small dept.) Active Records Storage—reduced from 200 to 150 SF(small satellite dept.) COURT SUPPORT—CENTRAL DETAINEE HOLDING and COURT OFFICERS p.14 Attorney/Client Conference Room—increased to 2(from 1) Court Officer's Breakroom—reduced to 150 from 200SF COURT SUPPORT—Jury Pool/Trial Court Secure Waiting/Interpreter Services/Court Reporters p.15 Trial Court Secure Waiting Area—added back in, 1 @ 120 SF; note to locate @ entry MH had a question as to whether or not 200 SF could accommodate 4 Court Reporters and their storage—this room is assumed to be where proceedings are transcribed and not for record storage—to be verified with SC COURT SUPPORT—PUBLIC LOBBY AND STAFF SUPPORT p.16 Main Entry Security Office—reduced from 200 to 150 SF Police Room—reduced from 150 to 120 SF Server Room—reduced from 120 to 100 SF Note added to locate Central Cashier with access to Public and Staff circulation Staff Breakroom increased from 2 to 3(HC will not have their own breakroom given their limited presence in building) MH had question about locker rooms being able to accommodate staff—since all staff will not be using locker room/showers at same time,space provided should be sufficient SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS—DISTRICT ATTORNEY p.18 Assistant DA —reduced from 80 to 64 SF Victim/Witness Advocates—reduced from 64 to 48 SF Support/Clerical—reduced from 64 to 48 SF Interns—reduced from 48 to 36 SF BUILDING SUPPORT p.24 Building System Management Office—moved from Support to Staff; kept at 320 SF to accommodate building manager and two workstations;one for CAMIS and one for HVAC and other building systems controls. Central IT Computer Room—reduced from 250 to 200 SF Page 3 3/8/2007 143 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program Bicycle Storage—SF removed with note to locate as exterior storage Telephone Room added per MH 1 @ 150 SF Page 4 3/8/2007 1" J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 5.10 Floor Area Calculations PAGE 147-167 145 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 146 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 4/2/2007 SALEM Trial Court Floor Area Calculations 11.28.06 Program vs 4.4.07 Study As Drawn PERPROGRAM ASDRAWN Total Total Net Dept. Dept. Net Dept. Staff Staff Square Gross Gross Square Gross Program Area Existing Projected Feet Factor Sq.Ft Feet Sq.Ft. Notes Courtroom Sets 34,456 1.15 39.624 31.089 30,668 Judicial Offices 21.5 36 7.024 1.25 8.780 7,696 12,409 Transaction Offices 118 148 23,928 33,499 25,939 36,482 Superior Court 34 42 6,491 9,087 7,073 9,079 Clerk Magistrate 20 22 3,717 1.40 5,204 4,106 5,299 Probation 14 20 2,774 1.40 3,884 2,967 3,780 District Court 49 61 91583 13,416 10,198 14,282 Clerk Magistrate 23 26 5,262 1.40 7,367 5,557 7,632 Probation 26 35 4,321 1.40 6,049 4,641 6,650 Probate&Family Court Register of Probate Probation Juvenile Court 19 29 5,303 7,424 5,916 9,298 Clerk Magistrate 10 13 2,801 1.40 3,921 3,004 5,024 Probation 9 16 2,502 1.40 3,503 2,912 4,274 Housing Court 16 16 2,551 1.40 3,571 2,752 3,823 Court Support 22 2 12,349 16,743 10,226 14,498 Central Detainee Holding 3,560 1.75 6,230 3,476 7,708 Court Officers 22 2 390 1.10 429 421 436 Jury Pool 2,415 1.10 2,657 2,477 2,502 Trial Court Secure Waiting Area 0 0 120 1.25 150 123 123 Interpreter Services 200 1.10 220 168 168 Court Reporters 200 1.10 220 177 177 Public Lobby 0 0 4,134 1.30 5,374 1,982 1,982 Staff Support 1,330 1.10 1,463 1,402 1,402 Court Operations 0 0 6,985 7,684 5,421 8,942 Law Library 1 1 6,985 1.10 7,684 5,421 8,942 Supplemental Operations 25 29 4,870 6,163 5,358 7,061 District Attorney 24 28 2,390 1.30 3,107 2,554 4,021 Grand Jury 1,460 1.30 1,898 1,606 1,812 Altomeys'Room 150 1.10 165 162 162 Police Prosecutors'Room 150 1.10 165 232 232 Alternative Dispute Resolution 0 0 - 1.15 - - - Adult Court Clinic 0 0 360 1.15 414 437 454 Juvenile Court Clinic 1 1 360 1.15 414 367 380 Child Care Center 0 0 - 1.25 - - Social Services - 1.10 - DOR-Child Support 1.30 - Building Support 0 0 4,504 1.25 5,630 3,923 3,923 TOTAL STAFF 187 215 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 94,116 89,652 TOTAL DEPARTMENT GROSS SQUARE FEET 118,123 113,983 BUILDING MECHANICAL @ 10%DGSF (was 8%) 11,812 15,463 SUBTOTAL 129,935 129,446 BUILDING GROSS FACTOR 1.35 1.47 TOTAL BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FEET 175,412 190,525 %NET TO GROSS 541 47 GSF/COURTROOM' 14688 15866 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS 8% 8% 'GSF is Subtotal of the building sf(before grossing factor)minus Supplemental Operations and Court Operations divided by the number of courtrooms SALEM TRIAL COURT G16290-Salem Trial Court\01_Generai root ReportTElectronio Filea\Chaprer 5\Salem-area-ralc_STUDV.. 1 147 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program COURTROOM SETS Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Area Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Courtrooms Superior Court 1.1 X-Large Jury Courtroom w/detainee dock 1 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 1.2 Large Jury Courtroom 3 2,000 6,000 2,000 6,000 Subtotal 4 8,500 8,500 District Court 1.1 X-Large Non-Jury Courtroom w/detainee dock 1 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 1.2 Large Jury Courtroom w/detainee dock 1 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,001 1.2 Medium Jury Courtroom 2 1,600 3,200 1,600 3,200 Subtotal 4 7,700 7,701 Probate 8 Family Court 1.3 Large Non-Jury Courtroom 1.3 Medium NonJury Courtroom 1.3 Small Non-Jury Courtroom Subtotal 0 Juvenile Court 1.2 Medium Jury Courtroom 1 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1.3 Medium NonJury Courtroom 0 1,600 1.2 Small Jury Courtroom 1 1,200 1,200 1,600 1,600 Subtotal 2 2,800 3,200 Housing Court 1.2 Large Jury Courtroom 1 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Subtotal 1 2,000 2,000 Total Courtrooms 11 21,000 21,401 Courtroom Support 6.1 Off-bench Judge's Conf.Room 3 160 480 1.14 Courtroom Entrance Vestibule 11 80 880 51 561 1.15 Waiting Area-X-Large Courtrooms 2 400 800 800 1.15 Waiting Area-all Juvenile Courtrooms 2 400 800 800 1.15 Waiting Area-Large Courtrooms 4 300 1,200 1,200 1.15 Waiting Area-Med.Courtrooms 3 200 600 600 1.15 Waiting Area-Small Courtrooms 0 200 6.1 Pre-Trial Conference Room 22 120 2,640 112 2,474 1.16 AIV Storage 11 30 330 1.17 Evidence Vault 11 50 550 0 Subtotal 8,280 6,435 Courtroom Holding Area 1.19 Detainee Staging 5 50 250 TBD 1.19 Detainee Soundlock 5 40 200 TBD 1.19 Detainee Holding Cell(group) 5 150 750 TBD 1.19 Detainee Holding Cell(indiv.) 5 70 350 TBD 1.14 Detainee Dock 80 TBD Subtotal 20 390 1,550 TBD Jury Deliberation Areas 1.20 Jury Deliberation Room 7 300 2,100 286 1,716 1.20 Vestibule w/toilets 7 200 1,400 186 1,116 1.2 Court Officers'Alcove 3 42 126 140 421 Subtotal 3,626 3,253 Total NSF-Courtroom Sets 34,456 31,089 Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 0.99 Department Gross Square Feet 39,624 30,668 SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_Geneml\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salemarea-calc_STUDY.xls Page 2 148 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program Notes: 1.Based on one per two courtrooms or distance from courtroom to collegial suite.This includes 30sf toilet. 2.Two per courtroom.In Superior Court only,1 or 2 of these may be utilized by court reporters as shared workspace.Refer to Court Reporter section on page 14 for additional information. 3.Detainee area shared between courtrooms.There is also a holding area at the Grand Jury(refer to pg 17) Only Arraignment courtrooms require 2 holding cells in core-smaller can have 1. 4.Induced in all Arraignment courtrooms,1 large SC courtroom and 1 DC standard courtroor 5.Ratio of Jury Deliberation Areas:Less than four courtrooms=1:1.More than four courtrooms=1:.7t 6.One per two Jury Deliberation Areas 7.Group detainee holding cells located next to 1st and 2nd session and X-large Superior Court courtroom.Number of group holdim cells depends on adjacency to each core.If 1st session,2nd session and X-large Superior Courtrooms share a core,then group cells between them will suffice.If any of the named courtrooms share a core with other courtrooms,2 group cells will N required and no individual cells.All other shared cores will have 2 individuals cells. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xIs Page 3 149 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program JUDICIAL OFFICES Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes staff Superior Court 2.1 Judge 3 4 4 330 1,320 328 1,310 4.2 Judicial Secretary 1 2 2 80 160 160 160 4.2 Law Clerk 4 4 4 48 192 192 192 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 3 4 4 120 480 113 452 4.1 Head Administrative Assistant 0 1 1 100 100 100 100 Total SC Judicial Staff 11 15 15 2,252 2,214 District Court 2.1 Judge 4 4 4 330 1,320 323 1,292 4.2 Judicial Secretary 2 2 2 80 160 143 292 4.1 Head Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 100 100 100 100 4.1 Law Clerk 0 2 2 48 96 96 96 Subtotal 7 9 9 1,676 1,780 Probate&Family Court Juvenile Court 2.1 Judge 1.5 2 2 330 660 370 740 4.2 Judicial Secretary 1 2 2 80 160 117 235 4.2 Law Clerk 0 2 1 48 48 48 48 4.1 Head Administrative Assistant 1 1 1 100 100 100 100 Subtotal 3.5 7 968 1,123 Housing Court 2.1 Judge 0 1 1 330 330 325 325 4.2 Judicial Secretary 0 1 1 80 80 244 244 4.2 Law Clerk 0 1 0 48 Subtotal 0 3 410 569 Visiting Judge 2.1 Judge 0 2 2 330 660 332 664 Total SCIDCIJCIHC Judicial Staff 21.6 36 6,966 6,350 Support 3.1 Entry&waiting (was 120) 1 80 80 421 421 3.1 Reception Desk (was 64) 1 48 48 421 421 6.1 Library/Conference 1 300 300 252 504 6.1 Staff Conference Room (combined library/oonQ 1 200 200 - 5.2 Equipment Room 1 80 80 - 5.2 Supply Room 1 80 80 - 5.1 File Room 3 80 240 7.22 Kitchenette 1 30 30 - Subtotal 1,058 1,346 Total NSF-Judicial Offices 7,024 7,696 Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 1.61 Department Gross Square Feet 8,780 12,409 Notes: 1.Includes 30sf toilet and 10sf coat closet 2.Support area to be located within shared(DC/PFC/JC/HC)judicial suite area with circulation capacity to SC judicial offices If judicial offices are spanning multiple floors,shared support spaces should be evaluated to determine if any duplication is necessary. 3.Superior Court judicial offices to be located adjacent to SC courtrooms;all other judicial offices can be arranged in collegial suites 4.Law Clerk and Judicial Sectretary may be located near but not directly adjeacent to SC Judge's Lobby SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salemarea-calc_STUDY.)ds 4 150 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES SUPERIOR COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data PERPROGRAM ASDRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 183 183 4.1 1st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 140 140 155 155 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 2 2 80 160 73 147 4.2 Clerics 17 18 18 64 1,152 64 1,152 Subtotal 20 22 1,632 1,637 Suoocrt 3.1 Transaction Counter)Service 1 90 90 99 99 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 286 286 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 128 128 6.1 Staff Conference Room 1 300 300 287 287 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 93 93 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 75 75 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 1,000 1,000 1,031 1,031 5.1 Evidence Room 1 100 100 77 77 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 393 393 Subtotal 2,085 2,469 Total NSF- Superior Court Clerk Magistrate 3,717 4,106 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 1.29 Department Gross Square Feet 5,204 5,299 Notes: t.Assumes 4 s128 pcsilions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,Including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cosh transactions in the department 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sflperson to accommodate 10 people('d>10 people add 15 sflpereon) Note:Initial 20 01person induces display space for tons,couner space for filling hem out,etc. 4.For depls with 10 people or less,provide 2009;For reins with greater than 10 people,provide 3009 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stared elsewhere.Calculate actual 8 projected based on wort dept.needs. 6.Additional evidence(i.e.large Rams)may need to be stared in locked area in basement(storage cage?) 7.Refer to staff supped section page 15 for breakroom information SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final ReporrElectronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xIs 5 151 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES SUPERIOR COURT:Probation Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Chief Probation Officer 1 1 1 180 180 263 263 4.1 1st Assistant Chief Probation Officer 0 1 1 140 140 113 113 4.1 Assistant Chief Probation Officer 1 1 1 140 140 106 106 4.1 Probation Officer 7 8 8 100 800 101 806 4.2 Associate Probation Officer 1 2 2 80 160 101 203 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 0 1 1 80 80 90 90 4.2 Clerical 4 6 6 64 384 74 442 Subtotal 14 20 1,884 2,023 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 99 99 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 200 200 257 257 6.1 Staff Conference Room 0 0 6.1 Interview Room/Intake 1 120 120 145 145 3.2 Drug Testing Toilet Room w/storage 1 80 80 87 87 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 88 88 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 78 78 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 200 200 190 190 7.19 Breakroom(shared) 393 393 Subtotal 890 944 Total NSF-Superior Court Probation 2.774 2,967 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 1.27 Department Gross Square Feet 3,884 3,780 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. Note:initial 20 sf/person includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 2.Transaction counlerwill require a small safe to handle cash transaceons in the department. 3.Assumes 10 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/person to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sflperson) 4.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf:For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf.Locate adjacent to intake rooms. 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Referto staffsupport section page 15 for breakroom information. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-c,alc_STUDY.xIs 6 152 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES DISTRICT COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data PERPROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Exlsting Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 225 225 4.1 1 st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 0 1 1 140 140 169 169 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 5 5 5 120 600 138 956 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 1 1 80 80 110 110 4.2 Clerical 16 18 18 64 1,152 63 1,134 Subtotal 23 26 2,152 2,594 support 3.1 Transaction Counterl Service 1 90 90 95 95 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 300 300 300 300 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 121 121 6.2 Hearing Room 2 300 600 261 522 6.1 Staff Conference Room 1 200 200 195 195 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 93 93 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 93 93 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 1,500 1,500 727 1,455 5.1 Evidence Room 1 100 100 88 88 7.19 Breakroom(shared) Subtotal 3,110 2,962 Total NSF- District Court Clerk Magistrate 5,262 5,556 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 1.37 Department Gross Square Feet 7,367 7,632 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30'deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle rash transactions In the department. 3.Assumes 25 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sflperson to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 91person) Nate:initial 20 sUperson includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.Assumes 15 people at 20 sflperson.I Assumes large hearings to be conducted In Housing Coon ctrm 4 dayslwk when Housing Court is not in session:pending agreement between the two depts;reevaluate if not agreed upon 5.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf,For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 6.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 7.Additional evidence(i.e.large items)may need to be stored in locked area in basement(storage cage?) 8.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information 9.Central cashier has moved to public lobby support functions for future use by all depts.Each transaction countef will need a small safe to handle cash transactions in the departments SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Thal Court\01_General\Final Repor6Electranic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xIs 7 153 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES DISTRICT COURT:Probation Data PER PROGRAM ASDRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Chief Probation Officer 1 1 1 180 180 217 217 4.1 tat Assistant Chief Probation Officer 0 1 1 140 140 189 189 4.1 Assistant Chief Probation Officer 2 4 4 140 560 360 721 4.1 Probation Officer 13 15 15 100 1,500 109 1,630 4.2 Associate Probation Officer 2 4 4 80 320 76 76 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 1 1 80 80 72 72 4.2 Clerical 7 9 9 64 576 64 576 Subtotal 26 35 3,356 3,481 SSu o�rt 3.1 Transaction Counted Service 1 90 90 90 90 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 306 306 6.1 Staff Conference Room 200 - 209 209 6.1 Interview Rooml Intake 1 120 120 128 128 3.2 Drug Testing Toilet Room w/storage 1 80 80 76 76 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 104 104 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 65 65 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 200 200 182 182 7.19 Breakroom(shared) Subtotal 965 1,160 Total NSF-District Court Probation 4,321 4,641 Departmental Gross Factor 1 A0 IA Department Gross Square Feet 6,049 6,650 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counterwill require a small safe to handle cash to rsacdons in the department. 3.Assumes 15 people,based an 201 minimum at 20 sliperson to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sflperson) 4.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf;For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual 6 projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Refer to staff support section page 15 for bmakmom information. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial CourC,01_GenerahFinal Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDYxis 8 154 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES JUVENILE COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data PERPROGRAM ASDRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 149 149 4.1 1st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 0 0 0 140 - 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 120 120 129 129 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 1 2 2 80 160 98 195 4.2 cancel 7 9 9 64 576 70 632 Subtotal 10 13 1,036 1,105 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 83 83 3.1 Transaction Wailing Space 1 275 275 255 255 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 120 120 6.2 Hearing Room 1 300 300 337 337 6.1 Staff Conference Room 1 200 200 149 149 5.2 Equipment Room 1 100 100 79 79 5.2 Supply Room 1 100 100 92 92 5.1 Acdve Records Storage 1 500 500 484 484 5.1 Evidence Room 1 80 80 75 75 7.19 Breakmom(shared) 225 Subtotal 1,765 1,699 Total NSF- Juvenile Court Clerk Magistrate 2,801 3,004 Departmental Gross Factor 1A0 1.67 Department Gross Square Feet 3,921 5,024 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff pos8ions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 3W deep mounter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash Iransacfions in the department. 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 2001 minimum at 20 sflperson to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sflpemon) Note:ini0a120 sflperson includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.Assumes 15 people at 20 sflperson 5.For depts with 10 people or less,provide 200sf,For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300sf 6.Assumes high density shelving.InacOve records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 7.AddiOonal evidence(i.e.large items)may need to be stored in locked area in basement(storage cage?) 8.Refer to staff support section page 15 for bratemom information SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final ReporNElectronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-oalc_STUDY.As 9 155 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES JUVENILE COURT:Probation Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Rat Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Chief Probafion Officer 1 1 1 180 180 176 176 4.1 1 at Assistant Chief Probation Officer 0 1 1 140 140 140 132 4.1 Assistant Chief Probation Officer 1 2 2 140 280 118 237 4.1 Probation Officer 6 7 7 100 700 100 703 4.2 Associate Probation Officer 0 1 1 80 80 101 101 4.2 Supervisory Cledcal 0 1 1 80 SO S2 82 4.2 Cledcal 1 3 3 64 192 73 220 subtotal 9 16 1,652 1,651 Support 3.1 Transaction Counted Service 1 90 90 90 90 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 200 200 249 249 6.1 Staff Conference Room 0 200 - 193 193 6.1 Interview Room/Intake 1 120 120 120 120 3.2 Drug Testing Toilet Room w/storage 1 80 80 77 77 5.2 Equipment Room 1 80 80 214 214 5.2 Supply Room 1 80 80 119 119 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 200 200 199 199 7.19 Breakroom(shared) Subtotal 850 1,261 Total NSF-Juvenile Court Probation 2,502 2,912 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 1.47 Department Gross Square Feet 31503 4,274 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions st the counter at 22.5 sf each,inducing 30"deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter will require a small safe to handle cash uansactians in the department. 3.Assumes 15 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sf/peman to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 of/person 4.For depts with 10 people a less,provide 200sf,For depts with greater than 10 people,provide 300s 5.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual 8 projected based on court dept.needs. 6.Referto staff support secfion page l5 for breakmom information. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_Generahl'inal Reporl\Elearonic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.As 10 156 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program TRANSACTION OFFICES HOUSING COURT:Clerk Magistrate Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 180 180 176 176 4.1 1 st Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 140 140 133 133 4.1 Assistant Clerk Magistrate 1 1 1 120 120 121 121 4.1 Chief Housing Specialist 1 1 1 180 180 190 190 4.2 Housing Specialist 6 6 6 80 480 63 380 4.2 Supervisory Clerical 2 2 2 80 160 89 178 4.2 Clerical 4 4 4 64 256 72 647 Subtotal 16 16 1,516 1,825 Support 3.1 Transaction Counter/Service 1 90 90 99 99 3.1 Transaction Waiting Space 1 275 275 295 295 6.1 Public Conference Room 1 120 120 143 143 6.2 Hearing Room 0 300 6.1 Mediation Room 2 150 300 139 278 6.1 Staff Conference Room 0 200 - 5.2 Equipment Room/Supply(combined) 1 100 100 41 41 5.2 Supply Room 0 100 5.1 Active Records Storage 1 150 150 71 71 7.19 Breakroom(shared) Subtotal 1,035 927 Total NSF-Housing Court Clerk Magistrate 2,551 2,752 Departmental Gross Factor 1.40 1.39 Department Gross Square Feet 3,577 1 3,823 Notes: 1.Assumes 4 staff positions at the counter at 22.5 sf each,including 3T deep counter and circulation space. 2.Transaction counter Will require a small safe to handle cash transactions in the department. 3.Assumes 25 people,based on 200sf minimum at 20 sflperson to accommodate 10 people(if>10 people add 15 sf/person) Note:initial 20 sflperson includes display space for forms,counter space for filling them out,etc. 4.Assumes high density shelving.Inactive records are stored elsewhere.Calculate actual&projected based on court dept.needs. 5.Refer to staff support section page 15 for breakroom information. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xIs 11 157 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program COURTSUPPORT CENTRAL DETAINEE HOLDING Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN and COURT OFFICERS Sheet Area Area Rat Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Adult Central Detainee Holdina 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Male) 3 150 450 153 458 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Male) 7 70 490 73 438 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Female) 2 150 300 150 300 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Female) 3 70 210 73 219 7.4 Observation Cell 1 70 70 73 146 Total Adult Cells 16 1,520 1,561 Juvenile Central Detainee Holding 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Male Juvenile) 1 150 150 139 139 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Male Juvenile) 1 70 70 72 72 7.4 Group Holding Cell(Female Juvenile) 1 150 150 139 139 7.4 Individual Holding Cell(Female Juvenile) 1 70 70 72 72 7.4 Observation Cell 1 70 70 68 68 Total Juvenile Cells 5 510 490 Detainee Holding Support 7.2 Detainee Staging Area 1 200 200 129 129 7.2 Detainee Entry Trap(w/double door) 2 40 80 72 145 7.3 Control Room 1 200 200 225 225 7.21 Staff Toilet 1 50 50 - - 7.6 Property Storage Closet 1 80 80 64 64 10.15 Shower)Janitor Closet 1 30 30 7.5 Attorney Waiting Area 1 30 30 - - 7.5 Attorney-Client Conference(Accessible) 2 80 160 122 244 7.3 Transport Officer's Room 1 100 100 ill ill 7.1 Vehicle Sallyport 1 600 600 507 507 Subtotal 0 0 1,530 1,425 Total NSF-Detainee Holding 3,560 3,476 Departmental Gross Factor 1.75 2.22 Department Gross Square Feet 6,230 7,708 Court Officers Area Staff 4.1 Chief Court Officer 2 2 2 120 240 135 270 7.19 Court Officers'Break Room 20 0 1 150 150 151 151 Subtotal 22 2 390 421 Total NSF-Court Officers'Area 390 /21 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 1.04 Department Gross Square Feet 429 436 Notes: 1.Adjacent to Control Room. 2.C.O.'s share one room;includes kitchenette.Staffing:2 per dri 3 at entry,1 ACO per Boor,1 CO in detention plus growth. (2/CR=11+3/enty+4 @1 per fir.+detention+2 Ch.CO+1=22) 3.Number of holding calls to be determined by the custody count at each locator 4.Within or directly adjacent to control room 5.One conference room for every 6 cells. 6.Located as dose to control room as possible. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_Generahl'inal Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.As 12 158 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program COURTSUPPORT JURY POOL,TRIAL COURT SECURE WAITING AREA INTERPRETER SERVICES and COURT REPORTERS Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Area Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Jury Pool 7.7 Jury Check-in area 1 100 100 140 140 7.7 Jury Waiting Area 1 2,160 2,160 2,136 2,136 7.7 AN Storage Closet 1 15 15 7.7 Jury Toilets 2 50 100 78 156 7.7 Vending alcove 1 30 30 38 38 7.7 Public Telephone alcove 1 10 10 7 7 Subtotal 2,415 2,477 Total NSF-Jury Pool 2,415 2,477 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 1.01 Department Gross Square Feet 2,657 2,502 7.8 Trial Court Secure Waiting Area Staff 4.1 Office 0 0 1 120 120 4.2 Receptionist 0 0 0 80 - Subtotal 0 0 120 123 Support 7.8 Waiting/Play Area 7.14 Toilet 7.22 Kitchenette 6.1 Conference Room Subtotal Total NSF-Secure Waiting Area 120 123 Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 150 123 Interpreter Services 7.9 Office area 1 200 200 168 Total NSF-Interpreter Services 200 168 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 220 168 Court Reporters 7.10 Office area 1 200 200 177 Total NSF-Court Reporters 200 177 Departmental Gross Factor 1.. 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 220 177 Notes: 1.Accommodates 100 persons,as follows:Provide a 70130 soft between chair seating and table seating. Chair seating for 70 persons @ 15 sflperson;tables for 30 persons @ 25 sflperson=1,800sf Size to be adjusted based on actual#of jurors from Jury Commissioner,8>100 persons,add 15 sflperson 2.This area should be located adjacent to main entry 3.Shared workspace off of public circulation. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xis 13 159 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program COURTSUPPORT PUBLIC LOBBY and STAFF SUPPORT Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Area Area Ref Area Description Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Public Lobby 7.11 Weather Vestibule 1 200 200 7.12 Security Screening&Queuing Area 1 200 200 196 196 7.11 Information Desk 1 64 64 191 191 7.11 Lobby 1 3,000 3,000 869 869 7.13 Concession/Vending/Storage 1 150 150 155 155 Subtotal 3,614 1,411 Public Lobby Support Functions 7.16 Main Entry Security Office 1 150 150 160 160 7.17 Police Room 1 120 120 128 128 7.18 Central Cashier 1 150 150 176 176 TED Server Room 1 100 100 107 107 Subtotal 520 571 Total NSF-Public Areas 4,134 1,982 Departmental Gross Factor 1.30 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 5,374 1,982 Staff Support 7.19 Staff Breakroom w/kitchenette 3 200 600 279 828 7.20 Staff Female Shower/Lockers/Toilet 1 230 230 132 132 7.20 Staff Male Shower/Lockers/Toilet 1 500 500 336 336 Subtotal 1,330 j1,122 Total NSF-Staff Support 1,330 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 Department Gross Square Feet 1,463 Notes: 1.200sf minimum 2.Includes 2 security screening stations.200sf min is placeholder;needs to be increased;pending further research 3.Assumes 200sf to serve approx.45-50 staff. 4.Breakrooms should be conveniently located in a neutral area so that they can be easily shared. Assumes shared use by departments;Exception:where staff exceeds 45-50 people,provide designated breakroom 5.#of lockers will be determined by number of staff.ASSUME 80 lockers and 1,200 SF for the study(32 Co's for courtrooms(206 courtrooms)+6(3 @ each entrance x2)+10(1/floor new facility,1/fioor PFC)+19 Maintenance Staff=66+/0+76+4 growth=80(Based on 1 per court oficer/1 permaintenance staff+10 addl eoun staff) (#CO+#maintenance+10 court staff)=#staff x 15st/person=sf(distr.appropriately between male&female lockers)=80 x 15SF=1200SF 6.Note:must be accessible from both public and staff circulation 7.Gunlocker housed inside security office. 8.Court Officer(CO)and Assisthat Court Officers(ACO)shall have full sized lockers.Maintenance staff and all other staff to have half sized lockers.Maintenance staff lockers shall be separate and located near maintenance offices/floor.Another staff to share with CO and ACO. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_Geneml\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salemarea-calc_STUDY.)ds 14 160 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program COURT OPERATIONS Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN LAW LIBRARY Sheet Staff staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Head Law Librarian 1 1 1 150 150 139 139 4.1 Reference Librarian 1 1 1 100 100 82 82 4.1 Law Library Assistant 3 3 1 100 100 118 118 Subtotal 5 5 350 339 Library Service Area 8.1 Public Entrance 1 100 100 115 155 8.1 Stand-up Public Access Computers 5 15 75 15 77 8.1 Reference Computer Stations 6 60 360 54 294 8.1 Public Use Equipment Alcove 1 90 90 Su000rt 8.1 Reference/Circulation Desk 1 200 200 219 219 8.1 Collections 1 2,500 2,500 1,348 1,348 8.1 Historic Collections 1 1,500 1,500 810 810 8.1 Current Periodicals 1 150 150 471 471 8.1 Tablesl Chairs 15 30 450 35 519 8.1 Computer Workstations 5 30 150 20 99 8.1 Microfilm/fiche Center 1 90 90 104 104 6.1 Multi-Media Conference Room 1 300 300 206 206 8.1 Technical Services Area 1 500 500 561 561 5.2 Supply Room 1 80 80 150 150 TBD Server Room 1 40 40 28 28 7.21 Staff Toilet 1 50 50 41 41 Subtotal 6,635 5,082 Total NSF.Law Library 6,985 5,421 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 1.85 Department Gross Square Feet 7,6. 8,942 Notes: 1.Confirm collection space needs with Trial Court Law Librarian;0 does not include aisles-they are in grossing factor 2.Computer Workstations@ 60sf per workstation. 3.Assumes 1 microfiche reading station and 2 microfilm storage cabinets @ 2'Wx4'L. 4.Includes 3009 storage 5.Pudic toilet needs to be nearby or adjacent. 6.Can be located in technical services within view or near circulation desk.A glass wall can provide viewing access. 7.Integrate display area into public entry. 8.Located near technical service area. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electionic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xIs 15 161 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS DISTRICT ATTORNEY,GRAND JURY Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes District Attorney Staff 4.1 Chief DA Prosecutor 0 0 0 120 120 120 4.1 Supervising DA 1 1 1 120 120 120 120 4.2 Asst.DA's 10 10 10 64 640 64 640 4.2 VUICIImVitness Advocates 5 8 6 48 384 48 344 4.2 Support/Clerical 5 6 6 48 288 48 288 4.2 Interns 3 3 3 36 108 36 108 Subtotal 24 28 1,540 1,620 Support 9.1 Reception/Waiting Area 1 100 100 230 230 9.1 VictimWmess Waiting 1 120 120 - - 9.1 UctimNVitness Conference Room 2 120 240 120 240 7.14 Toilets 2 50 100 64 128 6.1 Conference/Library 200 5.2 Equipment/Supply Room 1 80 80 69 69 5.1 Active Record Storage 1 150 150 149 149 7.22 Kitchenette 1 30 30 69 69 TBD Server/Telephone room 1 30 30 49 49 Subtotal 850 934 Total NSF-District Attorney 2,390 2,554 Departmental Gross Factor 1.30 1.57 Department Gross Square Feet 3,107 4,021 Grand Jury Support 9.3 Reception/Waiting 1 100 100 317 317 9.3 Vidim/Witness Waiting Area 1 120 120 88 88 6.1 Public Conference Room 2 120 240 117 234 9.3 Grand Jury Room 1 900 900 883 883 7.14 Toilets 2 50 100 42 84 7.22 Kitchenette 0 30 - - - 5.2 EquipmenU Supply Room Subtotal 1,460 1,606 Total NSF-Grand Jury 1,460 1,606 Departmental Gross Factor 1.30 1.13 Department Gross Square Feet 1,898 1,812 Notes: 1.Shared Space:refer to Diamcl Attorney Support 2.This space is only staffed when Grand Jury is in session. SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Courr,01_Geneml\Final Report\Electmnic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDYxis 16 162 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS ATTORNEYS'ROOM and POLICE PROSECUTORS'ROOM Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes 9.2 Attorneys Room 1 150 150 162 162 Subtotal 150 162 Total NSF-Attorney's Room 150 162 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 165 162 9.9 Police Prosecutors'Room 1 150 150 1 232 Subtotal 150 232 Total NSF-Police Prosecutors'Room 150 232 Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 165 232 SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xIs 17 163 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION and COURT CLINIC Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes 9.4 Alternative Dispute Resolution Staff 4.1 Office 0 0 0 120 - 4.2 Clerical 0 0 0 64 Subtotal 0 0 Support 9.4 Waiting Area 0 120 6.1 Mediation Room 0 150 - 6.1 Conference Room 0 200 - 5.2 Equipment/Supply Room 0 80 - Subtotal Total NSF-Alternative Dispute Resolution Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 Department Gross Square Feet 9.5 Adult Court Clinic:ISC,DC) Staff 4.1 Clinician's Office 0 0 1 120 120 130 4.1 Social Worker 0 0 1 120 120 130 Subtotal 0 0 2 240 260 Support 9.5 Reception/Waiting Area 1 120 120 177 Subtotal 120 177 Total NSF-Adult Court Clinic 360 437 Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 1.04 Department Gross Square Feet 414 454 9.5 Juvenile Court Clinic Need to check staffing and requirements for Salem Staff 4.1 Clinician's Office 1 1 1 120 120 122 4.1 Social Worker 0 0 1 120 120 123 Subtotal 1 1 240 245 Support 9.5 Reception/Waiting Area 1 120 120 122 Subtotal 120 122 Total NSF-Juvenile Court Clinic 360 367 Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 1.04 Department Gross Square Feet 414 380 SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salemarea-calk;_STUDY.xls 18 164 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS CHILDCARE CENTER and SOCIAL SERVICES Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Childcare Center Staff 4.1 Director's Office 0 0 0 120 - Subtotal Support 9.6 Reception/Waiting Area 0 240 - - 9.6 Multi-Purpose Room 0 1,000 9.6 Laundry/Kitchenette 0 30 - - 9.6 Storage Closet 0 50 - - 7.14 Toilet 0 50 - - Subtotal Total NSF-Childcare Center Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 - - Department Gross Square Feet 9.7 Social Services Shared Workroom/Conference Room 0 150 Subtotal Total NSF-Social Services Departmental Gross Factor 1.10 - - Department Gross Square Feet Notes: 1.Childcare Center must be located at grade level for emergency egress. 2.Includes interview alcoves and a reception desk. 3.1 toilet for staff/1 toilet for children 4.Social services may include the following entities:CASA SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.As 19 165 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 4/2/2007 SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN DEPARTMENT of REVENUE.Child Support Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Regional Counsel 120 4.2 Counsel 80 4.2 Child Support Worker 64 4.2 Clerical 64 Subtotal Support 9.8 Transaction Counter/Service 90 9.8 Transaction Waiting Space 150 9.8 Interview Room 150 5.2 Equipment/Supply Room 80 Subtotal Total NSF-Department of Revenue:Child Support Departmental Gross Factor 1.15 - - Department Gross Square Feet Notes: 1.DOR area must be located near an area that can handle overflow waiting. 2.Assumes 10 people,based on 200 sf minimum at 20 of/person to accommodate 10 people(If>10 people add 15 sflpersom SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations GA6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-areacalc_STUDV.xIa 20 166 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program BUILDING SUPPORT Data PER PROGRAM AS DRAWN Sheet Staff Staff Area Area Ref Area Description Existing Projected Units Per Unit NSF Per Unit NSF Notes Staff 4.1 Building Manager 0 0 1 120 120 130 4.2 Building System Manager Office 1 320 320 257 4.3 Clerical 0 0 1 64 64 64 Subtotal 0 0 504 451 Support 10.1 Judge's parking 350 - 10.1 Secure Staff Parking 350 10.2 Security Equipment Server Room 0 120 10.3 Central I.T.Computer Room 1 200 200 170 10A Central Mail Room 1 150 150 232 10.5 Loading Dock/Receiving Area 1 800 800 614 10.6 Maintenance Equipment Storage 1 300 300 254 10.7 Maintenance Shop 1 300 300 254 10.8 Outdoor Equipment Storage 1 500 500 424 10.9 Trash/Recycling Room 1 300 300 297 10.10 Janitorial Supply Room 1 300 300 254 10.11 Bicycle Storage Room 0 120 10.12 Telephone Room 1 150 150 170 10.13 Inactive Records Storage 1 1000 1,000 1 803 Subtotal 4,000 3,472 Total NSF-Building Support 4,504 3,923 Departmental Gross Factor 1.25 1.00 Department Gross Square Feet 5,630 3,923 Notes: 1.Confirm with specific site and project requirements;parking based on#ofjudges+#of Chief CM l Chief PO+1-2 addt'l each 2.This should be approx 350sf per space if double-loaded arrangement. 3.Minimum 500sf to accommodate storage boxes. 4.The following building support spaces are included in the Grossing Factor for the building: Life Safety Equipment Room Switchgear Room Tel I Data Closets Electrical Closets/Emergency Else Rm Generator Room Janitorial Supply Closets Elevator Machine Room Fire Pump Room SALEM TRIAL COURT Floor Area Calculations G:\6290-Salem Trial Court\01_General\Final Report\Electronic Files\Chapter 5\Salem-area-calc_STUDY.xis 21 167 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 5 Building Program 168 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis 6.1 The Regulatory Context for Courthouses The design of courthouses is subject to several sets of regulations in addition to the Massachusetts State Building Code and the Life Safety Code,as listed below. • 248 CMR The Massachusetts State Plumbing and Gas Code • 310 CMR Department of Environmental Protection • 310 CMR 10.00 Wetlands Protection Act • 521 CMR Massachusetts Architectural Access Board • 524 CMR Massachusetts State Elevator Regulations • 527 CMR Massachusetts State Fire Prevention Regulations • 527 CMR 12.00 The Massachusetts State Electrical Code 2005 edition • 780 CMR The Massachusetts State Building Code, Sixth Edition • Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(MEPA) • Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Waterways Program, Chapter 91 License Requirements • The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) • New Limited English Proficiency(LEP)requirements • Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 Discussion of some aspects of the above regulations particular to the Trial Court and Registry of Deeds/Family and Probate Court buildings follows. 6.2 The Massachusetts State Building Code, Sixth Edition (780 CMR) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is currently working towards the adoption of a new statewide building code based on the 2003 edition of the International Building Code(IBC). It is possible that this new code will be adopted in 2008 and it is likely that there will be a six-month period following adoption during which the use of either the existing or the new code will be permitted.It is also possible that this schedule for adoption of the new 169 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis code will slip another three to six months.The structural fire resistance requirements,the means of egress provisions,the structural load provisions and the energy conservation provisions are not expected to change significantly. The proposed Trial Court Building and the Probate and Family Court Building are mixed- use occupancies containing Use Group A-3,Assembly(courtrooms,large conference rooms(50 or more persons));Use Group,Business(office space);Use Group S-1,Moderate Hazard Storage(compact shelving areas,storage rooms);Use Group S-2,Low Hazard Storage(vehicle parking area,mechanical,electrical,plumbing&fire protection rooms) and Use Group H,Hazardous(fuel storage). THE TRIAL COURT BUILDING The Trial Court building is more than 70 feet above the mean grade plane and therefore will be classified as a High-Rise Building and must meet the provisions of Section 403 High Rise Buildings.The code requires the Construction Type to be 1B and allows a modification to Type 2A provided the floor construction remains two hours(MSBC 403.3.3.1). The exterior wall separation between the proposed Trial Court building and the existing Probate and Family Court Building will be approximately 25 feet.An assumed lot line must be drawn between these two buildings providing a reference line to determine the fire separation distance.The fire separation distance determines the fire rating of the exterior wall and the maximum area of exterior wall openings.The lot line should be drawn such that the existing Probate and Family Court building remains compliant with the building code. There are two open monumental stairs in the Trial Court building that exceed two stories, one serving the main courtroom wing(5 stories)and one serving the Juvenile wing(4 stories).If these stairwells remain open they would create an atrium.There are three options to address this condition.A series of two story openings could be created to avoid floor openings of more than two stories,the open stairs can be enclosed within a two hour fire rated construction;or an atrium can be designed in accordance with Section 404 of the MSBC.An atrium would require an extensive smoke control system as well as one-hour fire separation assemblies or glazing that is deluged by an automatic sprinkler system.This study proposes that the monumental stairways be limited to two story openings. The First Baptist Church to be renovated for use by the Law Library will be moved to a new location on a newly constructed full basement.The Church is believed to be Type 3B construction.The Law Library and the Trial Court building will be treated as two separate buildings connected by a pedestrian passageway.The pedestrian passageway will require a two-hour separation at each end.Both the basement and the first floor of the Law Library 170 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis will require a minimum of two means of egress. A Chapter 34 analysis will be necessary to determine accessibility requirements for these means of egress. THE PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT BUILDING/MSBC 780 CMR 34.00 Renovation of the existing Registry of Deeds/Family and Probate Court for the sole use of the Probate and Family Court was originally included in the scope but has been placed on hold pending funding.Discussion of key points from MSBC which will affect that renovation when it occurs follows. Chapter 34 of the MSBC will classify the Probate and Family Court Building,which is listed in the National and State Registers of Historic Places,as a Partially Preserved building.This will not apply to the 1970's addition. • Both the historic Probate and Family Court and the addition have stairs wrapping around elevators.The stair must be enclosed in a rated assembly to be a legal means of egress.The elevator hoistway is an open shaft through this assembly.This condition requires discussion with the local authority having jurisdiction to determine if it must be remedied or if a variance would be supported. • Assembly spaces(courtrooms)will be renovated and thus will be required to comply with the MSBC for new construction.This includes eliminating the dead-end corridors at the east and west ends of the building.It is proposed that new stairs be added in each wing to meet egress requirements. • The monumental stair,which is open to three floors,is considered part of the historic portion of the building.Chapter 34 requires that it be enclosed or treated as an atrium with a smoke control system or reduced to a 2-story vertical opening.Closing off the lower level with a rated door will create a two story opening with a"bump dowri' to the lower level.This approach will require discussions with the local authority having jurisdiction. • A standpipe and sprinkler system will be required.The fire alarm system must be reconfigured for all renovated spaces. • The entire building must comply fully with MAAB requirements since the cost of the renovation will exceed 30%of the fair and full cash value of the building.In the addition,the areas of alteration must be compliant with new construction requirements to the fullest extent practical.Where compliance is not feasible due to impracticalities,compliance alternatives must be developed and approved by the local authority having jurisdiction. 171 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis 6.3 Jurisdiction of Local Zoning or Other Authorities Projects under the authority of the State are not required to meet local zoning ordinances. Nevertheless,a thorough zoning analysis was conducted to ensure that the redevelopment of the site respects local dimensional and site regulations where possible.See Chapter 3 for that analysis. 6.4 The Massachusetts State Plumbing Code The code stipulates a ratio of plumbing fixtures per population based on building use groups.The plumbing code does not list courthouses as a building use group.The closest building use group in the plumbing code is office buildings.Based on office buildings the requirement for fixtures(248 CMR-74)is as follows: Water closets: 1 per 20 females; 1 per 25 males Urinals: 33%males Lavatories: 1 per 50 each sex Water fountains: 1 per floor The MSBC establishes the building occupancy load based on 780 CMR 1008.1.1,Actual number;1008.1.2,Number by table and 1008.3,Number by combination. Calculations for courthouses must take into account a variety of occupancies from business at 100 GSF per occupant,assembly without fixed seats-unconcentrated(conference rooms) at 15 net SF,courtrooms with fixed benches at one occupant per 18 lineal inches etc.An argument must be constructed to avoid double counting occupancies.For example,juries are either in the courtroom or jury room,but not both places at once. Similarly courtroom waiting spaces are combined with circulation spaces and are sized to keep adequate distance between users;a reasonable assumption must be made concerning the occupancy allowances.The same will apply to file storage areas. Assumptions and calculations establishing the occupancy load must be reviewed with the authority having jurisdiction(the local plumbing inspector). 6.5 Accessibility Laws There are two different accessibility regulations that apply to courthouses in Massachusetts. MAAB 521 CMR The state accessibility regulations,521 CMR,are part of the State Building Code and are enforced by the building inspector and the Massachusetts Architectural Access Board (MAAB).The MAAB requires all new construction to be in full compliance with the 172 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis Massachusetts Architectural Access Board Rules and Regulations(521 CMR).521 CMR does not address courthouses specifically but does cover public areas in public buildings. ADA TITLE II:STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)is a civil rights law that is enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice(DOJ).The section of the federal law governing accessibility in state and municipal buildings is Title II of the Americans with Disablilites Act(ADA). 35.130(a) No qualified individual with a disability shall,on the basis of disability,be excluded from participation in or denied benefits of the services,programs or activities of a public entity,or be subject to discrimination by any public entity. It requires that all programs and services offered to the public be accessible.The architectural requirements for compliance with the ADA are embodied in the ADAAG (American with Disabilities Act Guidelines)and are generally,but not always,similar to the requirements of the MAAB.The ADAAG guidelines are reportedly under revision. It requires that all programs and services offered to the public be accessible.The architectural requirements for compliance with the ADA are embodied in the ADAAG (American with Disabilities Act Guidelines)and are generally,but not always,similar to the requirements of the MAAB.Courthouses should be in compliance with the 2004 revision of ADAAG,even though it has not yet been adopted by the Department of Justice. The ADAAG guidelines are not implemented or enforced by building code officials, but in the form of formal complaints to the Department of Justice.Title II of the ADA requires that all new construction be non-discriminatory to people with disabilities.The design must support the User Agency's obligations to provide equal benefits to users in the most integrated setting without separate accommodation.It requires accessible features for employees as well as the general public.Where discrepancies exist between the ADAAG and the MAAB the designer shall use the more stringent requirement.All elements of courtrooms,except employee workstations,must be fully accessible to people with disabilities including all paths of travel,maneuvering spaces,seating and auditory components.Courtroom design for new courthouses should be accessible without the use of mechanical lifts. 173 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis 6.6 Environmental Permitting An environmental permitting analysis was performed in November,2005,by Epsilon Associates,Inc.,for DCAM. (See Permitting Analysis,J.Michael RuaneJudicial Center/Salem Trial Courts,Epsilon Associates,November,2005 in Appendix 2.9).The analysis covered the following: A Review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(MEPA) B Review by the Massachusetts Historical commission(MHC) C Review in accordance with Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Waterways Program,chapter 91 License Requirements D Review under relevant state and local wetlands regulations The project underwent MEPA review pursuant to 301 CMR 11.03(10)(b)because it consists of demolition of all or any exterior part of a Historic Structure listed in or located in a Historic District listed in the State Register of Historic Places.All buildings on the project site are listed in the State and National Registers of Historic Places.Three structures are slated for removal from the site and a fourth is slated to have an addition removed and to have the remaining structure moved within the site. Epsilon Associates prepared and filed an Environmental Notification Form(ENF)on behalf of DCAM on January 2,2007.Following a public meeting in Salem and opportunity for submission of written public comment,the Secretary of Environmental Affairs issued an ENF Certificate dated February 22,2007 finding that no additional MEPA review is warranted.MEPA determined that the project proponent can address development and/or refinement of appropriate mitigation for historic and environmental impacts through subsequent state and local review and permitting processes. Following conclusion of the MEPA review,DCAM entered into consultation with the Massachusetts Historical Commission(MHC)and various Interested Parties to seek ways to avoid,minimize or mitigate the adverse effect of the project on historic resources pursuant to 950 CMR 71.07(3). DCAM expects that the consultation process,which is ongoing at the time of this study,will result in a Memorandum of Agreement identifying appropriate measures to mitigate impacts to historic resources. 6.7 Air and Noise • Department of Environmental Protection plan approval under 310 CMR 7.02(Air Pollution Control,Plan Approval and Emission Limitations)will be required if any natural gas-fired combustion device has an energy input capacity exceeding 10 million British thermal units per hour(MMBtu/hr).A Comprehensive Plan Approval(CPA) would be required if any individual fuel burning unit firing natural gas has an energy input capacity exceeding 40 MMBtu/hr. 174 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis • DEP Construction/Demolition Notification is required 10 working days prior to starting construction or demolition activities(310 CMR 7.09,Air Pollution Control, Dust,Odor,Construction and Demolition). • Construction or demolition of a structure containing asbestos or asbestos containing materials(ACM)must comply with 310 CMR 7.09(2),310 CMR 7.15,and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants(NESHAPs)in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61. • DEP and the Massachusetts Division of Occupational Safety(DOS)must be notified 10 working days prior to demolition,abatement,or removal activities involving ACM. Notification to DEP and DOS must be made using DEP's Asbestos Notification form, ANF-001. • DEP has discretionary authority to bring enforcement actions in reponse to complaints if they believe that emissions or noise generated by an activity are causing air pollution (including excessive noise resulting from demolition or construction activities). 6.8 Sight and Sound Separation for Juveniles The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 limits the placement of juveniles in courthouses and requires that sight and sound separation be maintained at all times,when there are both juveniles and adults held in detainee holding areas.Juveniles placed in facilities where they may have physical contact with adult inmates are frequently the victims of physical,mental,sexual and emotional abuse.Contact that allows oral communication exposes juveniles to adult criminal behavior.The term"contact"is defined to include any physical or sustained sight and sound contact between juvenile offenders in a secure custody status and incarcerated adults. 6.9 Limited English Proficiency Requirements for Signage in State Courthouses New Limited English Proficiency(LEP)requirements are based on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,and its implementing regulations.Recipients of federal financial assistance,such as the Massachusetts court system,have an obligation to reduce language barriers that can preclude meaningful access by LEP persons to important programs and activities. Language access services are a bridge to help those who have not yet acquired,or cannot acquire,English proficiency.They are a bridge to help millions of LEP members of the American public have meaningful access to statements of rights,complaint processes, government benefits and services,and other critical information and programs. 175 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis 6.10 Recommendations During Final Design • The design team should confirm projected water supply and wastewater discharge volumes for the proposed Trial Court and reconfirm that the sanitary wastewater flows will not exceed the DEP permit threshold of 15,000 gallons per day. • The Design Team should assess fire flow requirements for the project and reconfirm that adequate fire flow capacity is available with the City of Salem s Water Department. • The Design Team should assess projected heating and hot water needs for the Project, determine the associated energy input capacity of proposed equipment and compare energy input requirements with thresholds for plan approval.If Limited Plan Approval (LPA)or Comprehensive Plan Approval(CPA)is required,DEP air permitting activities should be initiated once equipment specifications for heating and hot water are established. • The Design Team should reconfirm availability of natural gas and electric power. • If the church is included in this project,DCAM should commission a survey of the church and its addition for ACM or other hazardous materials prior to any demolition, moving or renovation. • Design specifications should include provisions for noise and dust control. • Design specifications should include provisions for erosion and sediment control. 6.11 Preliminary Code Analysis Preliminary code analysis has been prepared by Rolf Jensen&Associates(see Chapter 34 Evaluation Renovation of the Probate&Family Court Building,Salem,Massachusetts,J. Michael Ruane Judicial Center,Rolf Jensen&Associates,Inc.,4.19.06 and Concept Phase Drawing Review,Salem New Trial Court-Salem,Massachusetts,Rolf Jensen&Associates, Inc.,2.22.07 in the Appendix). The proposed new Trial Court building is reviewed for conformance with the Massachusetts State Building Code(MSBC), Sixth Edition.It is possible that Massachusetts will adopt the International Building Code in the year 2008.The project is also reviewed in accordance with the Massachusetts Architectural Access Board(MAAB)and the American Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines(ADAAG). An overview of the findings indicate that the building must comply with Section 403 of the MSBC for High-Rise Buildings(MSBC 403.1).Based on a non-separated mixed-use building with A-3 occupancies,the Construction Type should be a minimum of Type 1B. However,since the building will be in accordance with the High-Rise provision of Section 403 a modification from Construction Type 1B to 2A is permitted provided the floor construction remains two hours(MSBC 403.3.3.1). 176 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis A strategy must be developed for the optimal way to meet the required fire separation between new Trial Court Building and existing Probate and Family Court Building and between the new Trial Court Building and relocated Church/Law Library with respect to fire rating of exterior walls and the percentage of unprotected openings.An assumed lot line should be shown on the drawings that separate these buildings and provides a reference to determine the fire separation distance.The lot line should be drawn such that the existing Probate and Family Court building exterior walls remain compliant with Tables 705.2 and 705.3 of the MSBC. 6.12 Detention Facilities The Massachusetts State Building Code classifies detainee areas as Institutional Use Group I-3,Occupancy Condition V(780 CMR 308.4.5) The Americans with Disability Act,Section 11.Judicial,Legislative and Regulatory Facilities,11.2.3 Courthouse Holding Facilities enumerates ADA requirements.This section has not been incorporated in the Department of Justice accessibility standards and therefore is not enforceable. 177 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 6 Regulatory Analysis 178 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative / Proposed Project Scope n r - 7.1 Scope Overview The project scope consists of constructing a new 175,412 GSF Trial Court building on a site adjacent to the existing Registry of Deeds/Probate and Family Court building in Salem, Massachusetts.The proposed new J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center will bring together four different court departments in order to offer comprehensive services and take advantage of shared resources. The unanticipated rapid escalation of construction costs since 2004 has reduced the intended scope of the project to fit the project budget of$106,000,000.The space inventory was reduced from approximately 193,000 GSF to 176,000 GSF.This number will be reconciled with the pre-schematic square footage of 190,071 during schematic design.The final design for the renovation of the 77,000 GSF Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building for the sole use of the Probate and Family Court,part of the original project scope of work,has been postponed pending new funding and will be certified as soon as the funding is in place. To accommodate a facility of this size adjacent to the Probate and Family Court(PFC)it was necessary to acquire several properties immediately to the west of the PFC.Earlier studies demonstrated the infeasibility of utilizing the Superior Court building and the County Commissioner's building bordering the PFC on the east side. The site,bounded by the Registry of Deeds/Probate and Family Court building on the east, Federal Street on the south,North Street on the west and Bridge Street on the north is in the process of being assembled by DCAM.Assembling the site consists of the acquisition of the properties at 58,60 and 62 Federal Street,a municipal parcel currently serving as a ramp interchange between North Street and Bridge Street,and the First Baptist Church of 179 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope Salem. Still to come in the process will be the disposition of the Superior Court/County Commissioners building and the existing District Court building on Washington Street. In conjunction with MassHighway,DCAM's traffic engineering consultant(Earth Tech)is proceeding with the design for the reconfiguration of the North Street interchange. 7.2 Site Acquisition The site is made up of five properties:the First Baptist Church(56 Federal Street), three residential properties(58,60&62 Federal Street)and the land currently occupied by the east on/off ramps connecting North Street to Bridge Street. DCAM completed the acquisition of the residential properties in January 2007 and is in the process of finalizing a Purchase and Sale Agreement with the First Baptist Church. Salerris City Council voted unanimously to transfer the municipal property containing the ramp to the Commonwealth. The design for the North Street modifications is at 25%and has been given approval by MassHighway(MHD)to proceed to 75%design. MHD is in the process of planning a public hearing for the changes to their North Street project;the roadwork that is due to the court project will be handled as a change order to the existing improvement project already under construction. 7.3 Site Subdivision The site will be subdivided with a property line located down the center of the access road between the Registry of Deeds/PFC building and the Superior Court building. This will create a separate parcel for the Superior Court/County Commissioner's buildings for future redevelopment. The Superior Court/County Commissioner's buildings will be served by the steam utility from the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds heating plant as they are currently. The steam line's future disconnection will be addressed in conjunction with the disposition of those buildings and is not included in this project. 7.4 Building Disposition As indicated in the preferred alternative,the three houses at 58,60 and 62 Federal Street will need to be relocated to make way for the construction of the proposed new Trial Court Building. They currently sit on the proposed location of the First Baptist Church building. DCAM has determined that the buildings themselves can be sold separate from the property on which they sit,and is in the process of developing an RFP for interested parties to acquire the houses and move them off-site. 180 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 7.5 The First Baptist Church The First Baptist Church will have its rear addition demolished and will be relocated on the site at the corner of Federal Street and North Street,to be used by the new Trial Court as a Law Library.Prior to demolition of the addition,an existing conditions survey and a hazardous material survey will be required. 7.6 Site Preparation Scope The following steps are necessary to clear the site for construction: A Remove the three houses;secure foundations until they can be removed B Conduct hazardous materials analysis of site for potential abatement C Remove the three house foundations D Remove the Church addition and foundations The reconfiguration of the Federal Street/North Street intersection and interchange must be completed before the following steps to finish the site preparation can be taken: E Demolish highway ramp F Relocate utilities in the vicinity of the ramp G Construct new foundations for the Church H Move the Church onto the new foundations I Clear and grub the remainder of the Site 7.7 Trial Court Building Overview The proposed new Trial Court building will sit on the site that slopes approximately 15 feet down from Federal Street to Bridge Street.The building consists of a courtroom"bar" paralleling Bridge Street with a"pavilion'wing that extends out,at right angles,to Federal Street.The courtroom bar will house the Superior Court,District Court and Housing Court.The pavilion wing will house the Juvenile Court on all levels and will be served by a separate elevator.DA and Grand Jury are located on the lower level of the pavilion wing. Access to the public entry is from Federal Street into the pavilion wing. The service entry is located on Bridge Street,one level below Federal Street. The pavilion wing fronting on Federal Street is four stories high and the main courtroom wing fronting on Bridge Street is 6 stories high.The total gross square footage for the proposed Trial Court building including the renovated Church building with a new full basement is 190,071 GSF in the current preschematic plans.Efforts to reduce this overall square footage will occur in schematic design. 181 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 7.8 Trial Court Building Organization by Floor Lower Level:The lower level is on grade with Bridge Street and contains the sally port and Central Detainee Holding area,the loading dock and storage rooms,and the building mechanical and electrical rooms.Bridge Street provides easy access to secure parking for 21 vehicles,access to the sally port and to the loading dock. The space between the existing Probate and Family Court building and the proposed new Trial court building provides for ample maneuvering space for delivery vehicles and trash pick-up. The basement of the relocated church is also on this level and will house the collections for the Law Library. • Level 1 is entered from Federal Street through security into the lobby of the pavilion wing.Juvenile Probation is located in the pavilion and is entered directly off the lobby.The main courtroom wing is occupied by the District Arraignment Court, District Probation and District Transaction.These court functions are located on the entry level due to the high traffic they generate.The Law Library is located in the Church and is entered off the main circulation waiting area. • Level 2 is occupied by Housing Clerk Magistrate,Superior Clerk Magistrate, Superior Probation and the jury Pool all located in the main courtroom wing.The juvenile Clerk Magistrate is located in the pavilion wing. • Level 3 contains the Housing Courtroom,three District Courtrooms,jury Rooms and the judicial Suite in the main courtroom wing.A light-well/green roof provides daylight to the two inner courtrooms.Two juvenile courtrooms are located in the pavilion. • Level 4 is occupied by the Superior Arraignment Courtroom,three Superior Courtrooms,two jury Rooms and the judicial Suite.The light-well/green roof provides daylight to the two inner courtrooms. Two jury rooms and a judicial Suite are located in the Pavilion serving the juvenile Court. A mechanical room serving the pavilion wing is also located on this floor. • Level 4M houses a judicial Suite for two visiting judges. • Mechanical Penthouses contains supply and exhaust air houses and cooling towers. 7.9 Issues for Final Design A Reconcile proposed design gross floor area with program gross floor area. B Further refinement of program C Perform an existing conditions survey and Chapter 34 analysis of the First Baptist Church building to determine accessibility requirements. 182 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope D Perform more extensive geotechnical investigation to select most cost effective foundation system. E Establish property lines for the full site. F Analyze fire separation strategies between new Trial Court Building and existing Probate and Family Court Building. G Analyze fire separation strategies between new Trial Court Building and relocated Church/Law Library. H Determine extent of Detainee Tunnel connecting to PFC to be constructed with the proposed new Trial Court building. I Determine if provisions should be built into the Trial Court building for a future enclosed pedestrian bridge connecting to the PFC. J Locate steel braced frames in both orthogonal directions to avoid and/or reduce the cost of moment frame connections to stabilize the building against wind and seismic forces.Cost estimate is based on braced frames with no moment connections. K Life cycle cost analysis calculations refinements. L Operations,maintenance and renewal cost calculations refinements. M Energy modeling N Per AOTC:Detainee Dock and Detainee corridors glazed wall finish at CMU partitions to be 50"aff(see specifications C3010110900).Cost estimate carried CMU, without glazed finish.Spec indicates CMU with full height spray-applied glazed finish.Verify desired material and scope. O Per AOTC:consider eliminating cherry wood interiors at Judges'elevators(see specifications D1010/Judges'Elevators). P Per AOTC:eliminate lockable cage at Detainees'elevators(see specifications D1010/Prisoner Elevators). Q Per AOTC:telephone distribution to be Voice over Internet Protocol(VoIP) (spec item D5030/Comm/Security Systems). R Per AOTC comment,confirm scope of courtroom cameras and conduit(see Chapter 4.5, C.18 Security and spec D5040/0ther Special Systems). 7.10 Concept Graphics Site Plan PAGE 185 Plans PAGE 186-192 Sections PAGE 193-194 Elevations PAGE 195-196 Renderings PAGE 197 183 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 184 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope Site Plan p 50, 100, k 1 _ ID E Sr }- o i 1T FEPE L ST z o 185 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope BgI�GE STREEFRE NMP RASH ROOM V 1 LWVERs J o - f�Vj o 0 0 o c o F-- Goaacoa L-—— CENT MAP 1mw LFK iEU FLEC WIDOOREWIP IT EWW &IDP 9FPLY OAiA fIOCN Q7MP CENTRAL __ - - ROU L J M Mn%111 F F IA[LNANICAI UM ROOM F DETAINEES VIEV/ Pi0.98dEFUR/IETIM6. f.ONTRO! INDV INDV HC OBSV DT F TAG/NO kF(il V IF M ATi AR —- MD NC M M M 2 - LO.gRI00R LOWER LOBBY GROUP F UV F f cWRr STAFF i 'GROUP OFFICER SHWRY SMWR lW "� T, LOCKER/ LOG(ER/ DA M M CWRi 1 / TOµ ET TOILET RqC STORAGE C=ER µME FEMALE wWr V � 11 C.O. 1 L--'-- - sTORAGE DISTRICTAiTORNEY GRAND JURY AD T� El.. J WIP MECM UPPL GRANONRY R. I�AD I AO I ROOM vm AMU SNAF YWP II. ITIA. C RN MRMH RM wcRa vw� I—T vN s Ptty FILM �-1 I AD I AD I F R C NYTNESS QVF. A1 WA TING RWAITM CONE r DA PUBLIC ""L r-I µTT PROBC. CONF CLK S C/K LAW LIBRARY srDra�GE I I AREA �---------J LEGEND Public Staff L Detainee Superior District 0 20 40, N e Housing L-jFn �� ® Juvenile Mechanical Service Lower Level Plan Jury Pool Law Library Plan A-B N 186 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope _ BR/OGE STREET iSTCLN IST ASSIST ASWT ASSIST IXN.MAG. MAG. MAG , CUC CLK.MAG. CPO 1STACPo ACPo ACPO ACPO ACW STAFF ANG. MAG. IUDGE DISTRICT PROBATION STAFF CONE. RM Po PO 11 PO PO PO EQUIP SUPP \ 411 9iAFF EOL'IP ACTIVERECOR0.SSTOPAGE HM RM ACTIVERECORDS STORAGE - - cow.. RII slsr a 17- E � MAG - CM I IXN PO 1I0 PO CLK CLX CIK �J _�—_ ASs1sT DISTRICT CLERK MAGISTRATE _ DISTRICT cxK MAG. CLK I CtK I CLK I aN Cm-LL�Ct7[ w, CLK PD Po Po na Po CLK ClK CLK ARRAOURTENT 1Np, LdK-1 dK ffx ffX-L C—L, CX�CLK CLK CLK CLN W M ACTNER DRUG APO SCtrc W STDRAGE L EST m SUP. - ELI CL HEARWG HFIENEARING PI16 CASHIER HINFO INTER RM RM WAIT C016. Ems' VIEW WAIT RM. CDNf. LONE WM 'ENDING WM ADULT COURT - IXINIC COURT EPORTER OFFCE OFFICE OFFCE JUVENILELOBSY I i i JCOURT NIC EXIT � �'� WAIT INTER- \WAIT VIEW RM. OFFI C01P. MLKMOM \ W. i AIM� REF CLK CLK STAFF SCREEN - CLK SUP.CLR_ 81nHli UUU I� SEW - AREA .� DRUG I C_ � - ASSIST ® TES EQUIP. ;ro,71 1LAwuewlRrj _ + Po RM + I - JUVENILE PROBATION f J � AcrrvE REcoR + sTowcF PD J REF CS2CIAAT pN r= �A SUPP..R41 O REFT L_ + r r I REF. PO ASS PO PO Po coLw. Po Ro 0 REF. TA CT LISR � S VEST _ CHIEF PO 1ST�6T ASPoST STAFFCDNF. i ML PMBLIC ENTRY L- _0 00 _ i • U LEGEND Public FEDERAL STREET Staff Detainee Superior District — — Housing 0 20 40, N Juvenile I—I I— I Mechanical Service Jury Pool Level 1 Plan Law Library Plan A-B N 187 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 1STASSIST W / ASSIST ISTASSIST CHIEF LLKMAG. SUP SUP Ev;O 1ST ASSIST CLK PO PO Po PO Cpp Lpp S iAFF C K R MAG MAG PARIXE ASSIST. HOUSING CLERK MAG BREAK cGNF - RM G CIK MAG SP wtPo i T-P / NSP NSP REC K F. ACRVE RECORD DRUGEA-t7 CHIEF aK al( dXSTORAGE NGHOUSING SPEC cLK I ��y SUP fil[ LX�� RM SUP SUP. J ❑ RD pK aX I I CLEW AMG SUPERIOR PRO ATION ALrivE SUP. I dX lI I CLKI . AgypqL sTORAG CLK CLK MEDWTION I ~ RM �aK aK aKl QK CLK 1CIX � CLK CLX / \ I TRANSACTION W M TRANS cnoN ❑ qJ( M W MED. r COUNTER TET� D T�TIRON / \ RM RM AYIER- WARING CNELK- PUB W'� ' P� EWW IN MA WNTW R5EL000RERr INTERPRETER CONE. CONE � MEN WAIT SERVICES CONCOURSE POLICE / PROC ROOM A RNY ROOM ROOF PUB CON WAITING HEARING &� MGR ?RAN54LTIpN ROOM CWNTER OPFIi SEIOW 17 CLR aKJ ax I CUL CLK STAIF BREAK LOG ROOM OFFICE a/( I aK L meaow JUVENILE CLERK MAG. Em F--1 F-i IN ax ax ax saw RY I � RAa)COlm w STORAGE aK ASSIST W uwAG AI aK I � aK STAFF I JMAG CONE ax qX L�-- ---�—Q--0--0--0J LEGEND Public Staff Detainee Superior District Housing Juvenile Mechanical 0 20 40' N Service Jury Pool Law Library Level 2 Plan M Plan A-B 188 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope AO JUO JUD "U 7:k.UNv s7kF s1A I NM' JJUDICIAL SUITE I 1 STA" �e slue - GNEENROOF - LJLA HOUSING DISTRICT COURT COURT DISTRICT DISTRICT W u COURTk COURTO oFF Cow. Cw.. COVF. COIF. CONE. CONF. CONF COIF. W.,i 1N1 Cw.. JUVENILE COURT COIF. IMM OFFICE M W JUVENILE COURT CONF. CONE J � L'0 00 0 00--ate LEGEND Public Staff =Detainee Superior District Housing Juvenile Mechanical 0 20 40, N Service m Jury Pool Law Library Level 3 Plan " Plan A-B 189 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope '�a. Al0 IUD AID IUD sruv � ` srusrxFrfvnora STIFT JUDICIAL SUITE OPEN SUPERIOR ARRAIGNMENT COURT SUPERIOR SUPERIOR SUPERIOR COURT COURT COURT W V M W 11 Ti 0 � p Q OFF OFF. b CONE. CONF. cow.. CONF CONE CONF. CONE CONE. -IT 1LYf � JUVENILE JUDICIAL SUITE 1 m�'S STPFF .IFv MECH -i "1 .�D a ® J I � I r ..1 I j I � I " I � J � L'd 0---0 -0-0--0--0 LEGEND Public Staff =Detainee Superior District Housing Juvenile ® Mechanical 0 20 40' Service n I- I =Jury Pool Low Library Level 4 Plan N Plan A-B 190 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope vrsRrNc.nmeE vAsrtwc,wosE ROOF MACHIAN, ROOF ROOF Q� ROOM ROOF I STAFF N �� ROOF MACNP� Roots vrec OMTOlB.OIP OPENTO BELOW ROOM ROOF J � LEGEND Public Staff =Detainee Superior District Housing Juvenile Mechanical 0 20 40, N Service n r—� M Jury Pool Law Library Level 4M Plan Plan A-B 191 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope ROOF ROOF BELOW BELOW FIACHNJE ROOM A c..,n..,...IT , WC—CAL2 OPEN GOOF iO BELOW ROOF LEGEND Public Staff Detainee Superior District Housing Juvenile Mechanical 0 20 40' N Service Jury Pool Law Library Level 5 Plan N Plan A-B 192 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope OFFICES WAITING MECH. OFFICES X WAITING ASSIST ACTIVE RECORD JURY POOL CCURT Wg1T/NG CLK STORAGE REPORTERS TT MAG. ,STACPO P.O. P.O. P.O. STOP. WAITING X EQUIP, MAINT. DETAINEES X NORTH-SOUTH SECTION THROUGH GREEN ROOF MECHANICAL VISTING JUfF VOID SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE CGNF WAIT JURY 701LET TOILET JURY J OGE JUDGE FF/ DISTRICT JU ExARY COURT CONE JUVENILE CONE WAITING ACTIVE INTERVIEW P.O. RECORDS TOILE ES TOILET CLK TEL ROOM i li i STORAGE DI RICT PROBATIGN ACPO PARKING USDg PIP'OR R IL DET EES ATY RECEP. i i DA VEST NORTH-SOUTH SECTION THROUGH ENTRY 0 20 40' r-1 r I Sections North and South Plan A-B 193 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope MECHANICAL 2 X ARRAIGNMENT SUPERIOR SUPEFN)R SUPERIOR COURT COURT COURT COURT HOUSING DISTRICT GR EN DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT COURT COURT COURT DET. IFnA SUP. SING CLERK Ado TE UPERIORCLER TE SUPERIOR ROGATION UK. JURYPOOL WAITING PO. DISTRICT ARRAIGNMENT COURT G. S EftK MAGIS PO. P.O. P.O. P.O. P.O. DISTRICT PROBATION �" MAG MECHANICAL GROUP GROUP INOIV GROUP INOIV GROW INDIV M M M F F F F CENTRAIL MAIL ROOM LOADING DOCK EAST-WEST SECTION THROUGH GREEN ROOF JURY STAFF M Cm ICAl / I JUVENILE CONF, JUVENILE COURTWAITIN X ..._._._... A PUBLIC 4 0 CONF. VAI IN HEARING MN ✓�• RM. R. EMRARCE o PUBLIC \a P/ POLICE W, IG CONF. 11 RM. um DA CONF. GRAND JURY ROOM RM. EAST-WEST SECTION THROUGH JUVENILE PAVILION r� I I Sections East and West Plan A-B 194 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 0 L---�-- --- ———————————— ———— J SOUTH ELEVATION -EHTF17HI HITTUTT 11111 will N0111 NNE 11iffill mg NORTH ELEVATION 0 20 40' F--] F— I Elevations North and South Plan A-B 195 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope RZI]T Him —T] uld EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 0 20 40' n F-- � Elevations East and West Plan A-B 196 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy d 44p. ry "_ _ -•r , 1�� •� T a 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope IF Pr .01 ■e. +' ALN 197 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC •� ,_-rl 'E ,it � 1 ',g .3�1 ��•. � .e 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 198 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 7.11 Outline Specifications PAGE 201-243 199 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 200 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope m 91, 10 bi I~ 10 10 3 m M U) ro ro I~ m 9 4 U) x u1 3 >1 4--) -0 a) • >4 -11 4-) a) 1� O a) I~ O -H I~ M O -rl O Ur-1 U E O r1 m 91 4 � rd � ',-I ri "r-I "r-I U) (d -i "r1 >_,' a) rl r-1 "ri ro r-I A m N 4J 44 O H -1 M W •rd M 0 ..Q 4-) -'1 4J I 3 4J Ul 1-1 'n' 4-) N 44 A a) E O •,1 O ,� -� -rl 4-) \O Ul U, N �4 H 4-) 44 0 44P4 cd a) A 4"I a) � 0 O M g C, � U Q � 4-, P4 4-3 w N O ro_� 4-4 rd 04 o • a 04 O E �4 P+ � Qi � o aV O uoi a) E 3 O m � rUn bi O U M � A U O U q3 rd rt 'C 4-) U 0 O aJ 4-) ro 44 O� 4 a)Ma) �r-I ro i O Q b) v1 1�14 N -rl • O rd , O)4-) 04 40 O •"l U rOi , Cqp 4 z! OrH Q4 H ?4 4-) rd rd rcs U a) O N aT E o N 3 H O 0 O M 0 r I �' � � ro � t` N 0 ,A >,, � � O bi r-I � r1 N � rn O -0 r rd ro U E } r1 3 a, r1 r1 ro rd 3 N o, O � � U rd -H N 1 O aOJ r1 w f.' U '� -r1 N �4 U -rl '� 4UI o EP' 01 O � � o O •r-I -r1 ro N � 4-J N —1- R ~ W N Ui U1 rr 1I r 3 r1 �rd s~ �r1 rtU N � cy O U • M 04 aJ A 01 4-) • E d �; 4)rI +O Uo 4-3 rd rd Ua) N -r-I u-I rd 4-3 EE 0 �CO Q 0 O 41 O 'o U rd U M 3 , S-I rN OO 4-4 d ��4 U �A r M M O Pa HW r a) 'cs (d 4-) rr , -i om Q) a 4JS~ N J „ 0 0 3w gro GFa ro >, N -r-I M ! N p � O H O rd O m OU2O WE � �4 4 r- UaJ U, ro 5-1 -w I , U Ul U r r1 U) ro O ~ , O Pi Ln i r�- S4 ro O a) U �4� N I 4.1 l WN U1z Q 4-1 J UWO Ul 41 •U U O Ul r rd rO �i � 01 U rd U1 rd H Q) �4 N d r r1 a � N J- � LI 3 ro 4-I J 3 O w r1 O F a, r-I N - 4-1 00 N O +� O M �4 M � rI U 44 � P!O O N r U ro M u, 1 4) 4a U) a) 4) 01 G4 +� 4 EQ O u, 44 a) 4-4 •r O N aT o O O � ( 4-) N Uro U 44 w � "i . fi k >1'� M q U2 O Q H a-i O , w U a, �4 O r— r N r-1 M x -r1 aJ N Q) 3 z "r1 a) a) w l4 a) u, m -H r1 rO a) 44 JJ a) a) a) U r1 -H U ro 5 N O u, A E H Q) ¢a rO •,i N 'O "rl JJ rd '4 H ar�) � U, a) .� �4 -ri r1 � -r Q) ro L; 4-) r-I '� U) 1 ro 4 � -H rd �4gI � --H �4 A U) Pa 4 O ro ,s:a" •r1 pa,� -r1 -rl Q., F! �4 O r-I S..' O 44 71 -H N N \ u) H m CO U Q •ri f� 3 r1 -ri H m A ,J 1 u, ,J 3 cn ro U N FC rd 04 H �l N a r-I ro ro � •i1 0 U •r, 0 W 6Hl d a) aJ rn r-I U N H M H O H z H M 9 � Q) o z o U b U Q) W H � z H r1 a) ro -I X z GQ 2 Q H F w 'b o �> F:� O p o 00 x a q F W W w w w v) cn �l o O O �D 0 0 �o H H M M O aU O O O U W L H O W O [n 0 0 O U H H •• z H a• H O O 124 O P4 H P4 a F�4 P4 w rn r, 201 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope I w 3 10 rd co E a) >I U) a) a) O 'g" M O O a) a) a) �4 U O a) 4-) d 4-) +� .0 44 (DU ( o rd 0 OO (d 4-) U� O d H 4.)4-3 O 04 +a � — rd a) 0I O 0a)4 4J -0 �, O U In 04 rl U ,� U) .r-I O I" 1 ,� 04 P4 W O .r�".I a) 4 U � 04O mEQ 6 w Q4 � S U) O � 04 (0� ro U 4-)71 td O U) �4 a) `� rl . rd 'U N O 0� of � A - 4 a) a) r(J - -1 U 0 3 � s~ -r1 U) 4-J 3 a) a) l4 0 a) � � a) O � �+ a) x 0 r i 3 .H •H 4 � � � � rd � 4 � to U 44 4J P4 EQ 04 rd 4J r-i ate) -4 � O 3 ) -w U H - EaC �+ O o A 3 Lir1 rd a] 4-4vi A � U � O N •0 0 p r1 E H �4 (0 4-4 O o Q Ul O a) H U PI U rl z rd 0� N a) .rI r0 o g U) .r.1 � a o s~ 4-4 O .r.1 FI � U w ,� >4 S � I A a) 41 U O a) r0 N U rd a) G4 3 r I a) oo W 4 � U a) 1) 0 a J- � U) En rH O U) a) 4� 04 r rd rI 4J r a) 4 W Q01 N a) +a o ff O O r 1 a) ~ a)O l q3 ' a a) U O a) '� � o � C �4H O s~ O E l a o r rd 0 o r r (d U O 0 `U M Q) . rd (d 4 4 44 rd O O EO 4.) 1, W Ln d�-1 VI �43 51 �4 4) • 1 O 0) UI �4 U) �4 r1 N W G,. 41 to W �' 0 M � I a) N a) 0 N > 30 0 0 04 a) 4-1 � 4-) � 4-4 w Q a) 44 0 a) -r•1 44-) O rd U ro U o O r-I O —1 (d s O a) �4 0 O E .rq �-4 4 3 •ri a) •rI Q U) V) I~ Ul �4 U 04 a-) 44 �4 4-) rd W a) U rl J-) '> 4-) J--) > > rd '� 9i Ca. W a) a) -r-I U) U U) Na) U 04rd U) N M O - 1 a) i4 O O m I o t0 td td -r•I rr � � a) I~ 1~ 0 UU s~ rd '- P4 4a ,Q � ,O 4J U) � O >4 � -H N U) O a) RI M 1~ -,1 a) -H O O N �' m (d A rl w H (d H m (d a 4-4 m Cq 3 a' FC a E U) U H 04 a, 44 H U U a) U N o a ro 0 w rw E, U o m rd a) 4J M c ;J rl U W z 2 a) M rn H °a z ti 0 a) a N g z W Q O H > u] r-1 4J U � U O - 04O x K� a) w ri V a) H u) z I-7 U W 3 r-1 U ro o ° p H a H 2 z z a) a P: Qa 11 X x ,a) 'U - I-I X z a w Ia x w w w o y R O K4 z w U U rn U) m a) O a) U H Il 0 z w K4 KC FC F3 G4 0 04 Ll E-- �l 0 0 0 0 0 N O O o O E, H l0 N M M M H rn N r M (N M 0 U O O O O O U W L` F O W O u) 0 0 0 0 w F H z W H O N O O N 0 �W-1 CEn FC c c N r� r 0 U U P: O P: ]--' H a a F� P, [ZA r) r) 202 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope �4 1-) (0 `4 a) a) ,k a) v rO w r-1 U M O a) E 1~ A4 r-1 EQ O U -H U J-) A U J-) 4 s~ O (d -r•I J-) -H a) V Q I~ -H U r-1 V �+ 4.4 •r-I -r-I -H -r-1 J, (0 O JJ E O U O M .r-1 M O O 4-4 4 rn M �4 a) V) A (d r-♦ .r-I J-) �-4 JJ -r-1 S 0 O � P rI PE E � N � U 44� a 40s Q QH P4 E r1 .ri 04 r0 g a) U ! a) O U O O rd a) A vpi I~ (0 0 E 0rd � U O �4 8 � m rt � �4 ro U 0 N a) M 'H � �' 4J 01 O 75 P! ,�' a) U) P -H � � 0HrO PadA U E � -H 0 -1 O �' J� .H 4�1 O � a) �4 U) U 44P A ro ro r M U u 1 N O O O ri J, ' w a) U U) 3 r1 J 0 3 4-4 4-) M 3 r) 3 r1 0 U -) ,0 1 a) H Ea a)(0 4-) O E - N H A 3 4-4 r� 4 O p U) U OH U +i rd r1 of A C1a O ) 0 � rd U O O O N N ro U (0 ro p r1 Us U C U l O m O H (d a) O ro a) (d r1 0 0 ro ri � � w A O N 0 rd 3 �r-1 m U 3 JJ (D '� m sz a� 4 J, U 3 0 A 04 s~ E ¢-H 4-4 rt � � m 0 ro l4 ro r-I r 04 U] (d O a) a) E 4-I r-I '� —I ,4 -r-I �-1 Uj 'P4 (0 E a) -r-1 U O � a) JW 3 p, a) (0 A m 3 r-1 U r-I J-) � 4J 0 �Q r-1 -r'I � N .0 a) W �4 4-4 r-I ro a) H 0 a 04 0 M O a) r01 ro -W 4 0 m -r♦ a) vi O 3 A E O 3 44 ro � U) 4-) 44 a) a) �4 a) 0 J-1 OO M 44 3 s~ � a) a) O I~ I~ U r1 a U? —1 N0 0 w P a) U U m q z � 0 � P �� o � M H � g v G4 Oz rd � (d V p H 4-4 UU N EQ ,� 3 r •H -� O 3 N CI H TA F! O r-1 a) (a U O 4-3 J-1 a) \ N o ro O 4-) rt E ri a) O U) m ro �4 �4 r1 �4 ,�S. U 0) Uri 3 3 �''ri A ((0 rd � 04 O -O 40-1 rd N M U ro ro a) (d Ol N J-1 -rl a) ro �4a)rd X r-I '� rd U N r-1 r-I C'. ,� a' N W O N ro O 0 (d 'H a ;J 3 -) a) 1 ;J a) O J-) ! 'cl 0 � 44 l0 Q E rC5 J' �4 -1 r-I �4 U) ,: �4 r-1 0 J-) rO ,� U) 13) (d J-) a) -ri O O E -H �4 O r-I P4 O J-) r-I 4J M r-1 M a) U a) O E Ul rc$ U) N (0 S~ 4) ro W O � a) U 4 -4 ¢4i O (d U) E a) ,s_; U) ;J 4a U 4 a) r- E � ,O O � 4J -H M a) U W U 4-3O (n O � Q-i a) O 0)J-I r' �4 a -) U I �44--) �4 O a) �4 J-) 4 H f0 a) � a) J-) U r) a � �4 •r•1 ro '0 � -r•1a) OO � a) O � O ,OO � U -1roH -1-1 w U) ro a 3 U E4 04 r-1 E U � (n E s (� � a u E .4 0 U) 3 A 44 3 a) ro N a r-I ro ro U O z U .r' 0 U) 01 Cs r-I U U) 0 h ro a) U z P4 m 0) F EW P4 04 W FC z 3 W 0 a k rO +) z U) ar-Ii 00 � a°i w 0 u r-Ir-I 0 0 0 P 04 U (d U rcl �-I PS H a F r'J 0 � � 0 H h X x a I7 W 0 04 Q N 04 3 U CA v1 ,l =14- O O U) O M w E H M H H P4 U O O O U W L ' Ei L4 O U H E+ •• z H (� \ h F[; pC U) W EF L W' 0 (34 H P4 4 A,' P4 44 U) (Y) 203 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope >1 5v l-) U) C 4 U) 44 (1) FT, a) v a) W II a) -4 r1 � S� ,Q O 4� U) O 4 U) A Q O 4-) (d rd � i31 rd -H X a) 4-) a -H U �J O -rl rl 4-) -rl r-I J-) ,i," O Ul a) Ul U U) q �4 O O tD 4J a Q) O S~ U 4-4J a W r C 0 O rA a) 44 r1 rd (d a) �1 N N a' 1�-) r U I O [A 4a 04 a) �4O +�� M Q) bpi Q) uW) U) S O rd a) U Q Q 3 o w (d 04 U O U rd a) r� a) r4 as o — A � 4a U1 vw ' Q) � � � � a) 0 U) W O �4 O 3 4-)W rcs - � QE a o w� (0 O 0 . ) U) E rd f4 U 1 O Pa H rd N a) a) a) -rl O t✓ U . 3 0 04 H U U rd A E 4-) 0 Q) 04 �4 y rd 75 O r I fx o O (N 0 rl O Q4 w rd fd 4-3 O 0 7J a) 0 �^ �4 U rd M M I V '� (d U Ul rl �4U -Ha) Y-1-rl 'd 9i 0 1 444 1 U) r-I 4-) W rd +r U Ul 16 7S Ol a) a) a) N a) d ?-1 xi a) O N bl 4-) rd —1 C ri N 0 Ei U) a) A LOJ C -r 1 ) N a) 5 rd 4-3 � � U � � 3 (d rt � 0 r-i � �� m w N Uri q 04 bd a) W w 3 . O A M O O N O O" a) a) Q4 a) 1 O W U 4-) -H O bl W 0 Ir rd r1 '� EH U 4-) O N O M H m � - O 3 4a G U U r4 rl ri rd W JJ •• 4-I �1 � 4-) .. (d rl Q `o° W U •� '� r-I M N 3 O �. '� U '� �i 4U-I N U) �rd-I O N O p U I~ rl yu i rl 5.1.1 rd N a) O a) U S~ U rd 0 O rd -r Vi Ol bl .. �4 U O l� N }-I a) U U 0 U a)Cz z p 0 3 � s~ � -r 1 m .. � rt rd a u] � O r1 �4 � � � W O ri U) O H rl N U] W a) ?4 Q 3 0 a r I a) 0 r. 1� � Ol F F A � rd W a) rd C U) Q E a) O -1 �T+ a) rd o �4 a U rd ro H O rd M -rl O > I~ ro rd r0 is C ri U) O � rd H a) " rl a) - 1 H H o a U r 1 rd o a) s~ v . U -r 1 m o, 00 a' J-) W U] $ J-1 4-1 JJ rl a a a M JJ •r1 -11 -r1 J-) a 4-) r1 o U 0 w4-) O U A O G rd M ro 5 44 M O rn m �4 I~ a) 01 rd O �4 I~ a) 44 H m tP 44 (1) rO U) 4-) N N a) 4-) 0 -H �4 3 I~ � ; -H 5 O � � •n-H —1 (N a) � rd -H .H 4-4 w Q a) a) �4 �4 � a) O a) 4..) S O • -HO rO � a) ri O I~ a) a) M ro O O .H rO �4 QI a) U) I~ . V) U O 1-a '1 N ro 04 H3 Ln rd A co U •r1 q S U a a) rl 4-) rl OQ"1 U(''., S4 w �, .,i a) a) •r•I a) �4 —1 -r•I U O H P4 O M �4 � rO � a.-) O O N N co rd U Ei EA G] .0 m 4a rd A U a) U M U 0 N 4 ro � .H o U ri 0 U1 17 fd N U M a, H z p d O a a�i z u $4 � � � aH r-1 4.) U �S U F r!) a) m r! v Q) rn >1 rI O O (1) w z z O H U 4) O N U OH O I•] 114 0 04 Ll F r:l 44 Q �l 0 0 N O H Vl Ln Ln 0 U O O U W L` Z U O o U ° EW-I •• ,0 7-i H O N O U U a uEi PO N a O CL H > w a r.4 u, rZA r) ri 204 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope O O ro q E1 H _0 1~ .+ �4 u-1 u-I N U1 bl ?4 M 41 O 3 U dl _Q4 N r-I F4 Z O 44 N O N d I N N y1 E U) �4N ro +� �4 N 111 p ro -r 1 N O 3 ` �4 N � w U ro N U) U2 �4 U x a s~ o M -I E a o w o 3 a X14 —I o rl 3 0 O O .4 04. PO (D (d �4 o u vi ro +) m > M O 44 04 � -,] U U�j O m ?a O ri O 44 O O N 04 � � 44 ro -11 SC -H 4-1 (d o C N r�i � a) N OrdO3 �44 N N -,I U 4-)E O (d N ¢ M Hw U , w. rd 04 4 H - N N (d V N 1� U] U 41 �4 O G4 •Hi � Q) ro 3 ro N w tD O w -r-I r1 (d N E M N O rd -r-I �1 O s~ O r-1 ro y Pa N U >,41 q X rl I O C,' U r-I U •r1 E •H W t4 (d U1 N >4 lJ A 3 w ri a � a� Ol U, o Q) — � ro '� Fj QD H Qw O (d Ord N 4-I -- 01 O U1 4-3 O 4-I �4 � O N O U M (d J-1 O G z ro S� G JJ N 01 r-1 (d F: �1 Ul r I �{ 9, 4J OH M N U1 O 7S U1 r-I N N 4-1 �,' N II ro (d U E, }-I 'r-I `d ro U1 Ul E ;1 -ri •r-I J-1 �4 M JJ 04 ro U1 1"1 ,—I rd ro �4 �4 �-I O U1 3 N �- s� rd O 0o H � � (d (d (D Q N O O E >, � �1 U E E V M U r-1 0 �4 q 4-1 0 O O V1 (d U ro q N U o U q M -1 4-) O 0 Cv 41 O r-1 r-I �4 w N P: W O E ;1 g O a U1 U 41 N -1 ;5 0 44 w O ,-I 2: �O O H �4 04-) w w -rl -r-I r,, 1"1 O N 44 (d a w U 41 N 41 —1 O 44 Q 1~ -W N Q E E 4 ?4 �4q (d rd M 4-1 �4 -1 O �" W N ¢' w � M 44 44 o 1 W o w � w U w U E r� O ;J rd r•+ Ji Ei Ul o U N �+ JJv i N N r I O O t5 ro W U) r-i P( O 1~ �4 N r-1 O 5: w W M U U �4 M Q) ',0 al g. F:4 F:� 1 10 . • z -r-I a x ro E w ro N a r-1 M ro � U •ri ir, U1 6Hl d N V rn �] (d N U U a.1 O W Ix 4 U1 O H W a H >., rO 4-1 C7 L7 � F 0 0 O a-1 H H r-I 4.1 U ;1 U z z P: W z z N FC x �4N M 0 1J N H H F ,1H H H U ,R: U1 U1 (0 U) -n L7 [n P W W 0 [W P4 r-I o z O w z z O w x x a x U ro �-I H O O O 0 0 H O O 0 0 O O -rUi 1roj N C4 U 114 F U z z U P F H .. H H a) UI K4 N W W' H H K, W W R: Ri R: P$ P: ro —I z z G W �4 F., W, W W F., , W W W W W W O ? FC O P: P: P: x O U P$ P: P: x H E, E E, U1 O N U H ':) H H F O W ,D H H H >C >4' z SC h W U 11 2 E7 U1 rs 44 O 1 P: 1 44 Q U1 [U 44 101 W 1 W IH W �l 0 0 0 0 0 O H (n H (n E, H M Co Co Co Co H V1 M r` r- 1l- 1� aU O O O O O U W L • Ei L4 O z U O O O OU P z H O N O N W W r P: O P: H P4 a F:4 P4 44 U1 M 205 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope �4 r' a) 4- P, a) (1) rd — ty) a) rl U) ,s' 5:.,' M a) a) O O O U 4-) 1~ U) C O a) U 'd r1 a) U —1 ''O 4-) M rd 04-r-I •ri 1~ M rd 1~ •ri �4 -W M d 'd S~ a) >~ M O O 1u 1u (d s~ O U Pa E rd E O a) 4-) � I~ U) O a) r!" H w o rOi bi 4Oa ri rd U) oo M U O N 3 �4rd rd rd N 44 rd s~ io 0i a) q T~ -Ir E rd •�3 4-) OO ro H 04 44 A4 O ) O E Q 04 a) U1 a~ 3 r rn a) 4-) rl •ri O rd a) S-i rd 01 u� O rl �4 0 (d �4 a~ 3 O F" O 3 N rn S rn 4i 0 �i 4-) W W r-I r-I J�) � '� ''� 'r ,� >1 N •r� O i Ul O rd O m � � H ~4J o � 0 1 O QArd 4 rd o 4l � O4-4rd O rd oO � M a) Uz rd +u 44 a) �4 �4o U2 ',4r' 0 a) O U rid O bi O 3 3 N o to rd CD (0 U A a) +u d > S~ s~ •i 3 rl 44 a) o �4 44 a) a) �i �4 'd 4-) 0 �4 O a) rl C O 4-) 0i > O rt S~ 3 O' d U s~ x a) �4 r1 �4 M a 3 rid N 3 b) 0 o � U rd � � 0 O wrd � O 9 rd rd O M O r rI a) •r -ri �� P�4 N P4 a., a) $ r O a E IN w a (0 rd � rvl 0 0 � a) m �HO O r O J rl rd U ri rd 0) a) S~ 1-3 rl a) \ z s~ S~ � M I rd r r(d A rd U) 'd O O lJ rd 4 ri J rd 1~ H rd r1 04 rd > a-) a) > a) y� U) O (0d O �'o H �i H .1i U 4-) 4-) 0 a) a) rd ard ~ I a) O O 4-) rl 04 F rd •ri U ri M (1) > 4-r -H a) W N 1~' a) U rd 0o H � 04 a U) ) ?a rl U M U) rd rl U 0 -A rd -H ?A bt 'b s~ 0) a) a) ?I S~ 0) R$ U ;J Q-i•rn-ri rd M A.-) rd E -H h r. J-) l-) r-I 'd a) q a) -ri -11 JJ 1J a) 'r-, a) •ri •H o U -A O rd O rd U 'd rd �4 �4 4-) O > rd �4 M rd O 4-) •ri N 0) M rd M J-) O > rl M a w �i 4 �-I �4 4-) O 1~ rl O ;� a) �4 (D W �4 ;� a) U rl 'd —1 0 a) 0 >, I~ �4 a) >, rt (1) N W w � 3 aM ardMw UE44rdO 0 U3 ri �rI � w a) 'd � rn -ri aw u u 'd o rd 04 4J 4) �o u i-1 V U q o q • • • W • • ; • • U�] • U Q4 N ro � U 'd a) 4-) rn h rd N U M 4-) 0l F v 4-) a a�i z $4 � � 4--) H 4.) U �S U a) m rl v (L) rJ) On U (d U `C �-4 y4 04 a) N O F] N U 114 0 04 Ll F EF H H U) 9 U U W L` U H H •• z � H N O U U a uEi N a O W H \ 206 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope rd N N rd rl UI M E N r1 Is �4 N M 'd I~ N 0 .- N O r� r1 N s~ (V I:! Q U O I~ O U1 I~ q O rP 0 Ul Q JJ -r-I 0) �4 -H 5 U .r-1 r ;� �4 -H w �:5 —I (d -r•1 Ln 4-1 0 (d r!" l:i N (d -r-I :� -W -r-1 rO 4-) 'd O M Ul ;:5 "1 S ',4 3 .r 1 N bi-W rd r0 � N I~ H N � 5., I~ O N x +0� 4� M U I~ Pa 0 � I4 � O -H +u m (d � r0 d ri N 1H 3 a0.1 N rd O 0 N 0 O Q-'-r-l-1 'd 44 N N Ul rd N W i 0 0 N -1 o Q 4a N 3 3 N ((dd N 04 U�7 o O 4-)d ,4 � a N � 'raj �1 O rd rd CO a (do -11+� d o4H 0 U o � � u 3O 7 O d r� rJ � (d a .11 1 U V x 4-) 0 C A o (d o ¢, U r 1 4-)-r 1 o 0 rd r 1 a � -r-I r 1 4-) .. U) O U? 4' U) 4-1 �, ar J(d v 0 r1 PQ U1 N O� rd N O U �' O O U F I 3 N N H N t1 0 � � � •H Ir 04 N 3 �� 44 � 4-4 04 N � � .r -0 Q d O ?, I✓ S~ 0 cU U II a +1 -1G4 ,�, O 0 N O (d i � rd U •r'I 44 U 0 ;:J H ,-I �4 r1 i✓ l0 'C', �o (d x 44 j 9 Uri U? � N M U W N � (d : 04 � � U] p � O 4 0 Q4 U O 4-) tv U] � 0 iHGo4 W I N S~ � •� UrR 44 X 0 •U O r 1:1 �4 O 3 0Nr N HO 2 W O 000 U r A °M U -r-I � � X M r-1 r 4-4 -H O rd rd N� O r I ?-O r1 U) a 1 i (d . d ~ O , Ord Z O N rd W ,� �I r1 N Ol N M� OH V rl W N ,5 91 N 4.) �"-, r-I 0 r`4 w g � U N �"-, (d � r. 1' 4-) \ d (d o ro . 1 d � (d (n bi Er 0 N 4-) , 1 3 -ri w s~ q N rd U? \ q r 1 �, I +' A N (d 3 3 Oo H 'r-1 $4 O $4 ?A r A FA d) �4 W Ul O ty1 ro 'd (d x Ul P: 3 N 4-1 O �4 U] r-1 r-I N 4-1 N (d rd N �-I -,� W (d 0 .r-1 1~ IZI N r I N rn o U 4-3 O M ;J I~ U tP 3 U) 1.) r-1 r- N 4-) N N '� �4 ¢+r� -,-I (d 1-) a' U) 44 ,-I ro -1 O ;1X 9 O O r1 O O ro I~ 0 � � a N � .H rd W 0 � (d ro W O art w m W (Cl O (n w -r 1 N O 0 P r I r I r� 04 s~ 4 1 Q M 4-1 4-) U rt O O s~ N >~ ri 0 o O 0 O a 4-4 �4 H i —I d r N (0 W r-1 N r= % 44 4-) 4-4 3 N 5 �4 U 5 ro 8 (d I~ N O m � O U Ut O N I~ 4-r U O �4 -4 (d r-1 O N w \ • . a� U (d (0 cn U a = w (d U (15 u a N r-I (d (0 .H O U -r1 d N 4-1 rn �] (O N U -H M F �'• Uru 1J U] Ix a�i g z m o rO 4-) w z � r-1 1. U �I U E. H Ul W CA C 4-) a) r-I U) 0 m n O v W W H a O Q W ro hN O N U H 0 O F4 H Ei G4 0 rx Q E a U] O 3 U] U] �l 0 0 0 O N O E� H N Ln d H V] O 00 00 U r O O U W C` • Ei L4 O Z U O O U P4 •• H O N h FC M rU) W E, C0 W' O W' �."' H \ a a K4 a 41 U] (Y) 207 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 10 1 (1) 1~ �4 0 d1 S~ u1 • 9 •- w �4 r-I (V x al a) r- q O O 1~ O (d '0 •rl m �4 O —4 U �4 -rl a) -4 (d •H \ rd �4 Q4 N M O 44 a) 91 O 44 04 O �-4 4.) 10 O 75 1~ 1~ O U U1 �4 U 44 E 9i A4 0 4-) V a O ri rd O P4 d 1~ O 4J 0 (d 3 a) ;✓ O N O N N A O 04 U) O � +1 0 OHO a) V) M 4-) Ea � 0 1 0 U) • q U rt � Q 3 w OU a) ,� U a~ Oi 0 � 0' 0 Q) 4-4-4 U � � rr-I, 0 01 U 4J > � 0 4� a) a) r4 U 0-r (d >, �4 N �4 �+ 1- U 4-4 0) 4-4 rd O r 04 1~ �-I r Ea 751 (d 04 rn in O U M � r�i � � rd 4-) aiE41U E H s~ rd ss -H � bi a) Op N �4 u' O 3 O U -r U O O O 4OI � N m U O r-I 3 O a~ O m 0 O N rd O >~ rd 01 U1 a) -H r1 }4 5' 44 O a) U .� 00 r1 O (d m P4 cn r1 A > -1 O .� rd 8 O ,� r-I rt a) .1i O r� M O -rl rd 'J a) M '-I a1 -rl N -4 CO H Ola) 44 N a) r1 a) � O U) �4 1'- O .1 4-1 rt Sd � rd S �4 �4 U U O U 0 � •rl 4-4 ?4 (0 cd N �4 (d ¢1 4 a) 3 �4 C U � N O r1 rUn Q4 ? O r O O r-I a) 4 a) �rd � (d o � r-I � U 0 -rl .,-H � O �+ r-I O r-I �4 s~ N co rd �4 d1 , +•) o S 0) s~ N a) O �4 3 r1 U q r1 S~ r i X r1 I 3 �4 t~ rs, 0j-r-I rt 01 r1 U \ cd •r1 N •rl rt W U ro o r1 r1 s~ .d d� O 4J rd E 3 N O a) O al d -r1 a) Ol -rl rd In a) r1 r1 .,i E� w O r~ z rd r1 rd t3r 3 �+ 3 0r r1 rd ? O O r-I r-I a) �4 -r1 a) U 1~ 3 a) am a) 4J o Ol.,�4 ,- .,� }4 O S4 4-4 . H 9 G' ,—0 O ,—I rd a) I -r1 -r-1 O �'-, Ea � 'd � 44 '� 0 O M o a M > 04 r1 U f4 a) O y 5 \ � 4 � N a) � 3 S~ 3 Q O � O 5+ H S-'i a) E� ;J a) M }4 " a) r1 �-I O O U r-I I 4-1 �4 a) `d �{ rd o a •r1 �4 O U 4-) 4-r �4 4-1 O '0 r4 O o 4a rd 3 H :1 r-1 a) s~ 0 04 r-1 0 -r1 g M o U U �4 rd M a) 1~ r' -� ;J O d1 3 O a) rd 4-) O 07(N U rd d w •ri r4 M i� O a) M rZ4 r4 ';1' r1 r0 r1 O �4 rd 0)-ri rd o -rl 04-0 N W a) a) U 44 2 W U 04 M = Cu O r-I a) 0 = � �-I ; 9. 911 4-) 4-1 •rl N �1 -rl 4-4�o Q ?4 '0 I~ rd �4 -rl N 4-) -H • 4 U N ri m pq (d N X O o N • 4 - 4 r1 rd �4 O N U 'o � a) r1 �4 E 1~ Q)U a r' Q) ;:1 4J rd U ;S �4 ,-I ri Ol ;I rd O O 00 E O �4 rO V �4 Q) 3 �4 O C U U a) 4-) r0 4' U UU N �4 Q) Q) � r-I (d 4-) O rd O -0 ri Q) 1~ a) � M 0 a) N \ m 4-) 104 • • • • • • (d �4 U U x a) U U U a) rn Ul •rl cn (d M M 10 U a N H (a FA .H o U 'd al rn O 17 (d N U Q d U Ei ro +� ° W 0 Ix 4) �. z H H 4J U '� U W a O 9 M a) w ri v Q) K4 Ia H Ix H 0 Z P x O U ro Q) w H 9 H 3 Q NH la. O S O Q) U ° W �D Pw4 SEC O z �] Ga 0 04 Ll E a U U] W x W �l 0 0 0 0 Q rn O H O E- H a' Ol H d' H En Co O O 00 0 U C O O C U W L` E� O W O u4 � O O H O H W N h � x CO w Ei � w P4 O P4 x H �H \ P4 a r.� w [IA r) ri 208 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope I 10 • .X (1) 1J �4 O v �4 S4 rO (d w a) 44 4J $ U) 4-) a) 'O U 'O Q a) • U) a) O -H O A O a) �4 O M 4J a) 4.J ?4 -H -r-I Q '> Ln (d P4 -r-I 0) 4 O w �-I r-I a) -Ha) 00 U) M M S4 > ,Si O N A �4 -r4 4J �4 M p (d 4-I r-1 3 -1 C O .Q O rn � a) �4 r1 0) O -1 . U I~ U) 4� O r � � a Q4W00 k � 3 � .,1 rd ro m � � ( M O r1 O O U (d ?4 � PQ N r�4 N � M O N (d (6 r I 0 (� Qa m ems~ a) FCN � U4-) U4 p � Uq4 00 ✓ a)O 4-) Q U U - U� v 0 N U0 rJ 0 1 4-4--) O 4-) a) O N 04 0 r I � aJ LL � y �4 � � s~ (d a) N O -) 4 w HO 4-) rd 4-) a) 0 0 4-I '"d rA 0 0 4-) rd O (� Q4 A 4 O O c U4 a) O U w O O O r1 O O U s~ V, 3 yJ r-I ai ro - 4-4 wS~ 04 4-)a N U U � a) (d U 5rd Q4 U 4-)-) 04-r-i �4 r O r-1 U �J �4 8 (n - a) 0 rn (d O O a) rd �4 '0 � a) 4-)-) N 04-H �4 � �-' �4 O -r-I N Q U -H U NIII r 1 (ayJ �4 �,r ri 4J J.J (d a) 4-) �' •H (d U) M a) —1 M -ri N (d S4 44 ',� (d a) .,�-I M .ri Q S. a) -' 5 44 N '� �✓ tp 0 O O r-I ,� �4 N RS 4-J -H 4-4 ril M 44 � bl U O O M O 4J 0 A U) aJ �4 r1 u) O r-I U] (d A �, t3' i A r-I (d ,4 (a 5 N 3 N -r.1 s~ 0 rd O 3 J-J U 0 •r�i O I �4 .. � 14 S- t4 0 01 U O bl (d W 0 4, O -ri O w a) -r 1 O A >~ w 0 r1 �4 iJ �' 0) 4J (d Q4 r1 44 �J �'r--1 4J 3 a-' r1 4.) a) N a) \ H O -) 0 4-) a) r. m cd En r0 N 1J rd O a) V N a) F! ul of a U I~ "1 Q4 3 � � H rOi O U U) rd U)) w (d 0J O 16 rrdd (dd (n -H O H rd �4 (d 4-4 4-4 O N 1J rd m ?4 O U A I~ ?4 I~ H -r-I N 4-)O w 04 a) 4J J •r-1 �+ U) x O C: rd ri rd �" a) '� —1 r0 —1 a) ?, U) M o U 4-) �4 4J a) �4 Q) 0 ro rd •r1 U) ° O r-I N Ol M M a) Q rd a 0) U) )4 a) (d N aJ U) O O Q4 . M r-I , rd >1 Q 4-) A rO 0 �40 ?4 4J a) r-i N w O m �J 3 ,� -r1 rO Q 0 Q W -0 a) Q rj 2: -r-I J, r4 O rO 4J Q rn rO f3+ 44 lfl Q 04-r-I (A Ul z U N Ol-r-I 'O U rd 'O \ O 0 rd rd (d ?4 rd U ?4 (d r I M r4 -H �4JE (0w r( s4 r4 N N a) Q4 r4 N �+ Mv 4-4 O p N N 4-) Oa r 1 a) rd rd (d �> r= Q4 rO Q4 Q (d PQ O �4 M O �> m v rd O r F� r-4 M O I~ (d > r-1 U) S4 O 0 �4 rd m a1 N \ (n (n H U) LL U) LL 04 U M rd kJ (d 44 W W -ri P4 04 (d • • • • N a F •H O U •r' 0 U) m m F r4 U O z 74 h b a) U O H U) O `n M H QQ o z rn ws44 U) U w W ,U7-i O H A, z x M C4' H U) Ix d)a) U1 C +J a) O u 3 P z 44 r d O o W E, 2 N U W W Q a ,b ro -� � z � w w r� o '� Fc O v x o 0 w w (1) O a) v H w E4 0 0 w W > P h G4 0 Ix 2 E U) O a P4 FC C7 �l 0 0 0 0 Ln M M Ln to rl E, H M H Ln N Ln H d) 00 0 U O O O O O U W t� • E� P: O z v O O N U H P .. z X H rn O jCN r� M \ rJ FC x rM W E� r W' O P4 Y-' H \ P4 a FC P4 44 U) r) 209 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope U 0 rd O 4 N Ul 'd 10 4•4 � > O S~ 4J 4-) 4 (d N N O O �-4 W -r•1 (d r I J 1 N 5 J, r 1 O O - 3 m �4 �A (d �4 N H (� bl U 0 u-1 •H -I U-r-I � 4 0 a) N 0 O '� O U OU m 8 'd U] 4-1 'd rd Qa N rt Q Qa 1 H (n N N w O 3 rd o rd v �-) a a � m U ro p,' rn 4-I O > 4J W N I U 0 O N O U1 N I H Q, O J-1 H S-1 -w EQ � � � O 1~ � N U 4-) (d >1 � `I-1 O 4A 0 > � (d O N U U N (d O w 01 -� A ' N U N �I 04 0 O Qa Ea (d Qa 0 4-4 •H 4-) rd �J 4- N 0) � -q O U p r l • � O � � 4 J-) c � �4 (d N Q, �4U M rd co O fS1 O U (d M U E N �-1 I-1 � I~' U a -� M ° O Qa N w° rl4-) -- rN �- • l 4-4 0 �4 O > S.- O 04U N ?4 O O U 4-) NrI w (d N N Ui O Q+ M U x r1 p I -J Qa U) . 3 Qa s~ Qa N 3 E � � r 4- .H U O ' N U H J -- � -,1 4-7 En N fd (d 0) �4 N 4--) N N Q � � ro 0l 00 Fi (d N N -H '� C'i J-1 N L: 4-) -H -H Q Qa �4U] Qa-H U 0l �i Q1 4--) 4-) J-) }4 �4 �4 •rl U] J-1 •r-I N J-) M U O ,S' 0l (d N O E 0 >,.J O O M � A UQ(d rd H 0) 01 •r•I 4-) U U W (d co N - 1 •ri O t4 O >v X (d O �4 O >r > N F f~ ri r 1 4A Q U a lx U) w u-1 �Q A2: CA w > �D Oa) a�i H ) 0 rt N U 5 (d�a ( 4-4A > 3 > (d 4-) C O H O O �4 O O O N m PQ4 � (d• • • • • • • • • W ¢i O U a U1 a (d O U (� N (2L4 ro ri) ro � U a .r' rd N 4-) rn F f7 (d N U 4-)i 1 F 0 E a N g z x W En H rl 4.) U '�S U Ul Z N CA r" J-) N o ZO x aU (aU •d ow a) w>4 z Ea N O NU ° a U O x z F] N O PG Q F u4 H �l 0 0 0 O O N F H ID r H M r r cn 04 U O O O U W L` U H E z E H O O U H W r4 M r h � x CO w H � � t4 O IX x H �H W a u', W fs w M 210 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope \ U) T1 O 0 rl d U? r0 r• U �4 S4 1,4 Q) � Lk-4 w � � O O N 0 Q) O S~ M � 'n � -W 4-3 Q) N U 44-� Q4 JJ U 04 (d 1~ �4 � � > S4 0 a) (D�4 ro m 4J ti 440 U) rd r- a aJ O U U) N j 04 0 � a) � '' a) � Q �4 U) a) ,� S-I '� •ri .0 _1 �4 ,� J-( ZJ~-r•1 -raj �+ � w 44 O � � � 3 uUi � Ra uOi � � � +UJ � � � U1 r 1 3 N ° O A U O 04 In CA r 0) U r1 44 P4 � ° O 0 � (d o 44 � rd � rd N rd C N 1J EQ Q (d d' W 0 r-j r-1 � }-I In 04 UZ 0 (d 0 04 rt rl 0 U ° (� G. N rl �4 (d 4-1 �4r-i ° aver ro (6 v ° U � � rd H -H 'd N 1 4-4 1J O) U P4 ° 44ro o rC r Q) N 3 0 d H P4 4-) •r-1 U a) r-1 �.' z >-.' r-1 ,� ° r� N U) 0 q w N 0 H 4-4 a) Q, 4-) a-) ° (d O rd �' 3 O U U - 1 O +4-) U) 0 U fd w z �4 -r1 �4 Ul 0 a) 4-) U 4-) rd vi 0 a) ° (d M ro 0 () 0 H �4 (n (0 O) Ul r0 ro Q m �A \ H 04 a) rd 44 U 4-4 (d N M 0 1~ � 0 >, r'4 (1) Q U C.' U)''� 0 —' 0 N 0 w �+ 0o H Q rl ¢( 1 (d rd 1~ H rd a) 0 (Y) U1 rd 0+ r-1 ri J-) U) U) (d Ul �4 s4 3 �4 r1 Q) -�' s~ r, (� a) r� �4 �4 rn 4 � � O 0 Q) U 0 rd 0 Q) 0 U4-4 N W a) Q w N (1) 0) w a O 0b1 ' ° lfl Q (d 'cl U Pi U 1-. O O ro -w rl $ ro (1) O a) 3 -r1 •r•I -r•I 3 0).H W •H M r4 0 Q •H Q) w (� P4is 0 5 � 0 s~ r 1 w r 1 �> ;J - ;J r-1 r 1 rd a Q O U r-I 0 S 4 r 4 -4 -rl ,Q � -4 O O U U r i 0 Q) r-I 4-) U 4-) U 0 �4 a) 7s r--1 r4 ;I F-1 m (d �4 U 4J (1) 0 0 Q) a) a 0 � N W H •r1 aG a, U) 44 aG PQ 04= 5C 3 a (d (1) cn 4 3 H U La cn 41 � U (d N a H (a P (d z .H o U ri 0 W 6H) d a) rn h rd aa)) U O m U) M H Eru z Di N S4 U) O H O z Ul F P s4 7+ 'O 4J 'zi P 0 0 a) CA 0 � Q) U a H Q 04 U (d U ro �r-iO O O O 0 Q) a F-I H N H ,b ro ri W w �- X z w w w w Q 0 �> F:4 0 E x Px x H E 0 N 0 N U H z H H F z W O F-J W U 114 Q E, H 44 ll, O H � 3 �l O O o 0 Q (n H O E, H N CO H N H CI) 01 r OD 00 a4 U O O O O U W L E� P4 O z U #1-- O O O U O H z H M O O N h'D K4 x U) W F U U U W' 0 W' �."' H \ LL �l A,' P4 44 U) (Y) 211 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope k r1 4-) rn 3 H �4 rT 1 U (0 �4 a) o ff E � a) 1~ O U1 -W 0 -r1 a M a) (d ri -H O r1 a) � �Q4 U m � w �+ „ In � � o aro A U1 O O U) O 4-1 � �OU � d rn EO 4--) a � 0 4J � m al U) 4J cd rd a) �4 o Q) �4 U) (1) 4-) 01 �4 :J a) pU O rn U QO � -r1 U O 0 �4 r4 X U) -H � �4 E 1~ U M (d G.. a) �:I a) 4 A a) U) a) rd w 1~ 5 4J (d a) p � (d rn � rn 0 r rq U ro M U U M 0 0 1~ m �4 rl 4-) 4-4 0 0444 M O ro a) � N 04 U)) -H (d -11 c(dd o 3 0 a) o 3 ro O a) Mro W o w 0 >~ 3 � O 0 aJ m m r•-I M N (d U) 0 0 S4 (d -ri U (d -rl 44 O 0 0 w O a) w U 4-4 O O H Q o) ,0 M 04"� � a) -rl `� r-I r 4 01 EQ -H �" rl � rd � U � a�i Q' U 3 (d C O -rl 1:1 � U rl a) 0 U] (d -H 4J 'd � r-I $ r-I ro 1~ bi cd w a U u-4 x U U rl v t~ 4J A a) }4 J-) o r-I ro r r I r a) rl J-) rl . o U ,r u) v u 3 (d w w a) 4-) 3 N O pi r`-I N ro 04 r A (d w r-I tl1 •rl Ul U) N 1. 0 Q) -r-I 0 H H •rl o O a) N '� a) l7' a) a) Ul L7 11 ,� 04 ro >✓ a U) N +� O a Q P4 0 (d Ol 4-) (d O H P4 a) 0 O 0 U1 0 0 1• O '� S: U1 W M o Ix -W U U) 41 = U 4-I r, -H ut (d `H 1 w >1 o U r � (d U) a) O 0) r'+ � �] m • a) a) -I M rn m I~ a 0 V)- (a V \ 4-) � o a) .� - 'o a) ,o 4-4 N W (d J-) + O a) '� M (a � to Q) U)Q) o V)- rO S-I S4 Q) J-) W ) O w Q 4-) U U c7 a) V. r-I 0 0 U o a) �4 a) -H m rc$ 9i O W M 0 M 1) 3 (d 3 -r-I a) W -r-I W -H U 3 44 U -H 3 -H -H r4 P!, 0 a) —I N E -4 � w U) M o o � 4-3 � �I d) r4 N 4-I O 44 r-I r-I , U -r-I l r-I w r� U, O M O r4 4J -4 � -A ,Q M 43 \ V O r� M r4 ,Q r-I M CS' �.,' 4-I U —1 -H w9 O rI O -r-I a) ri r� O r-I r I G4 r� a� a) •rl M Q) O 0 1~ 0 (d a) \ �+ d w M (d rn aQ M a' •rI a' few U) F(', U) a P. 2: U �4 U ;J a) w �4 U W n5 N [� 04 H (a z ro � o pHq U) U r� G] .-1 'd N U 4-) 0) U) F h (d N UEQ U? W FC a) �H M F H rU) 11 w w W U Z W (Cd ° W 0 C7 z w � M o 0) FZ4 z H E z w W H W 0 U Cx 4) U rt a H Q CQ U M M Q w $4 7v d 4) w a FC P4 � H w �D P P r-I 4.) U �S U W W CL O 0 Q z > W O F H a) w r! 4) (L) U] W E 0 z H w U zw CO Q a' x ri H 0 w a U Ga � Q U ro Ix 0 w m r'a Q a U H (1) 04 Q', H a P m H 0' W H a 3 U) U) >. ul 3 Ix 9 w m H w 9 w w a Px w '� -rl E z Q W Q a r4 z �4 w a U N H w z 'C O 5 FC 0 U) H U W U (x zQ H U) FC (x H f] G4 L7 PG Q F H OE FC Q 11 P4 ra F E V) w W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O O w r O O N (D O F H r` H H N a' Ln L() 00 Ol H V) 00 O O O O O O O O 0 U O H H H H r-I H H H U W L� H O W O CO � o o O U H E-I •• z E H O H N O N h 9 x Uw1 W F U " U a r O D U ) N P4 O P4 x H \ W a A,• W C* U) M 212 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 10 4 a) 'd - I~ 4 �4 a) a) U1 rl Q) Ol 4 H O 1-) (d rl d a) U - (d PQ U r4 4-) (d -H a••) �J 4 O (D rl U 1~ I~ a) �4 0 0 �4 0 rn A P; (d -r1 -r-1 a) U ;J C7 U) 0 44 U +u d �4 ,i 4J P4 U)a) 44 a) � 0 � � � U N LP U1 C a) U O � d rd m 44 O d 0 rd 4-) rd 4-) U] 44O pI-� ,i rd � 0 rdU a) -H w4 UU O 44 rd �Jrid �4U rda) a) rd p, m UU1 A Q) �4 M ��4 41 E ro -H � ro -1 U rt S to rd a) 00 ul rd d rU 3 r-I C O 0 -> O r1 -) O 3 � U2 d � � rl s~ �l 4 +J U a) � Q) rl rd � � 44 EQ 4-4 �4 5 O � m 4J (d 4 d �4 M �4 d rl ;J Ol 44 b, �4 �4 a) rd P U PIa) E d r U1 a) 1 rd O N �I �4r0 r0 4 4 .,! M d 4 O s~ �4 d d N a) bl bl d U O O by• >1 ri d O d N 4J a-' b 04 U vi �4 C a) �4 -r-1 �l U 0 0 0 U J g � d � b" 3 0 d a31 Cal 0 d FAA d U � I~04 Q) m m u) E a) H 4J P' N C m OU U A O D U O 0 H -3 3 m rd a) � 41 3 O � - H � d N (d cad U1 rl d 3 rd U al rl d � g U1 rl a) S4 H U rd UU11 O d e F1 -H H0 3 w U O � U 4 Hrdd a) � d 0 d 3 H d rl r-I 0 d s~ l� r •r-I s4 -1 U1 -3 � U] 3 0 O a) Q) 04 r. � Pa M a) -r-I r E O A � -H � E -r.1 H 3 rt 0 3 ,� � rd m 0 3 •� rI O a) rl -r•I 4-4 44 r A a) 4-4-1 4 U d d N •� O U GT4 s~ U ,3 N O d a) 4 U? 0 rl bl- 0 3 a) W U O d 0 O d 11 a) 3 0 -r-I a) a) -r I 1� U1 N U N a) rl U H O' O U r, � -HrCI �4 4' 3 U o -> ( a) Id M us m m O a) • 4J d d 4) '� xi O rd rd rl a d U? U1 rl 00 a-) W rd >, A U M 04 � a) +J O d d o H a) rd 4a � +� H O � m -r-1 •r-I m N O � rl M d 0 � r) o p; bl r1 d 4J '� d a) 0 ?-� rl 4-) ?-� 0 4-4 r4 ''� r1 m 3 4-) d d �4 U)P: a) r U) 44 (D r-1 U) A rd U) �4 —I 4J U1 -r-1 4) 04 U) r0 r•I 0 ;J x r I d a) d 0 ,Q a) d �4 3 w 1 r0 En w0 N W a) d 4-J d 0 )4 >, d a) u1 U 3 r 44 d d 04 W 0 0 U1 a) U) r0 Q �4 � U o 4J -,� � A r0 s•I a) 4 a) o O W a) U] Q) 4J 3 —I �4 -H •r-I U a U rn H o d 04 0 r1 rl a) a) U P4E 4-4 0 -H a) rl (d 4-) b" a) )-I O a) 44 r,, 4J U a) 4-4 4-J (d ro •r1 71 (d a) 4 U O 4 44 -H U U) N u1 4-) O U) LL F E b, E E 1 U �4 F O 44 Z d U d N Pa m � � z .H o U E- .r' d N V rn U1 W h ro aa) U x H UJ _4J 131 Di H �4U) O 44 P: U z w w H a H a AI N r1 1.) U '� U U) H ly 'D rt En (0 UU) n ,Z H F �' 30 WO U ro v W [U ril U1 H H � U a) 0 b � H H P: E- W 0 ?0 Q) U O [2�, z 04 F-J W C7 P: Q E, U] W H H U1 Pa Q E� H H V) P4 U U W L • E� P; O U •• #1-- O O O N U H P •• �4 X H O M O h rn FC x U1 W EF U U U 124 O PS H P4 a Q• P4 44 U) M 213 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope �4 U - rn 4 U ro U) r1 p - m a) a) w rd 4-3 O V) JJ Q) Q) M -rl Q) E (d 2: 'C cn a) U - U) 4-3 Q) (d Q) -rl r-I 1.1 -rl 5 N O U U a) a) q L: C; Q) H -rl W O r-I r-I -rl -r1 >_', rd (d O -r1 "rl -1 •H Q) U O rd +-) ;J .r"I �4 r-1 a 1~ 14 8 (d �4 •11 O (d Ol 4 4-3 � rt? 44 Q) U) (d Q) � rd � a) � " >� �+ (a Orr U �, > U a) a) 44 o m r-1 o r-I •� Q) U rd U W '� �' O � E O s~ 3 Q) C or, h44 U 44 .11 "� 04 o rd U v � S "� •0 Q) v rt O O (� N orU .r, " (d E � U ro a) r-I 3 1-1 r-I U) 4-3 -1 ,� J-) cd iR Q) O 3 A rs Q) " U a) 3 ro U a) � p, � - 1 3 v _ U m u-i p v NEn > rI -� U) U O 4-13 U � (d o v � � � 04� � � � v o 44 rd o y U ro A E "�4 >~ S 4` o ate) '� " O U U U Q C 1~ (D Q) r-1 01 � p U a) U 0 Q) U U > P4 E m N O rd O O ai MS -H 3 ro 3 m S EQ O U g rl (d b4 U U 3 ¢ 5 d A Q O H44 rd O rl � 4 � � r 144 o r I N rr � N rd q _0 M -) Q) �++ N U rU/) � o S (d }I ri O -r1 S~ Cl �+ W rl � (d (d w - 3O Q) O � °-1 T a) M 4-) E O (d Q) w U AO O O pU '8H U O Ua - bpH (d 44r 04 � rn Q) � EQ 4O M o +' U ro o m rd 0 (d , O w (d (d a (a o U ,� � Q) h � H 4 - 1~ (d r1 (d 4-)m O 0) 'b "r1 U O a w a ro rn O ra Q) Q) U O U rd b4-) �l } r4 4-I 0 �J 0 O 4-1 o o (� )a) -H H O 44 rrio O Z � a) Aro VN � 4-) o rl � w H Q) a`•ri �q •r U) w U r-1 F4 N ¢] rd a r-I O Ca. —1 �' Q) rl r1 s; J-1 ,L,' O �-I -rl -rl O r1 rl -i U A w rd 1~ O Q) ro r-i r1 (d Q) O � U Q) O Q) � O Q) w a) 'd U) O -HH U U (d i' -ri l-) A 0 r+' -rl (d 4 4 O rd a) 4 r1 A O O 4 LIA 4 0, a) -1 O (0 Q) w co a E4-) r1-I m E 1 (d 0 4-) H �4 a Ei LIA H U B H o H (a �4 w U r0 (N a H (a FA ro U 0 M rn U) 'd (1) 4-) rn w f7 (d N U ri) rA 4J rn H z U 4-) • w Ix a�i � z rx $4 � � � O r-I U �s U a a) m rl 4-) U r-4 r� U ro ° o � N Q) 04H a� � z w o y F:� o z F] N 0 04 Ll H H H � 04 U U W L` U H H •• �/ E CD H Cn O U U a uEi " (`) a O IX x H > \ w a r.� w rIA r) ri 214 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope r-I Q) L.' 1J Q) 4 r-1 N Q) Q) U) r4 Q) E) W �4 � �'. Q) S4 � (d J-I -H (d N 1J (d r' ,s.' Q) U r4 Q) r•4 - O Q) U) -r1 U) N U Q) rl (d U (d 4 J s~ i~ 0 4 J O N 1J ri 1 N 4 0 rl S4 a) a) U) r-1 -ri (d rl N 'O in U U U) 0 >1 M 41 >~ U +J H (d '4 -rl (d -r1 Ui rd O (d a 0 44(d P'. U1 4-) Q) r4 H ,4 4 J Ul r-1 04 r I ,0 0 4-J z � N 44 )4 04 a) UI P4 o UU u, � o r oI~ O a) ;J �4 N A EQ 04 (0 3 O D U N a) O N 0 04 4JQ) rtr-I 04 Q) 44 = U � N i( �b U U U O o .o = 0 O � U) U •r1 M q In O O r I :~ � -;1' 9'. Q) -H O m 4-4 -4 a) Uj Q.aJ M b� O r1 0 O rd (b rd M � M 04 Ul N O 4-4 r I ni -3 >1 U 0r1 4' a) m r I 0 44 s~ 4-40 U) U, -W � ''tl Q) 'U (d Q) 00 4-) S•i H ri� •H P4 �4U M 0 o O Q) a) a J (d (d 04 O nS U U �J N Q) w Ea N m r-I �+' r-I r I rd .0 U) r� O 0+ r4 '� '0 O M r I O O 0 r I (d U s~ I~ U ---I � N a) O O N x 3 - rl N � d 4.J U Z U N rU1 3 I~ Q) r�-I aUi7J Q) > ai -r1 +�J q a) -r1 3 � �+ Us _ > rl = O ,-i 0 O a � > � O S � > � O -) � N � u�i .� U a) O N U) aroJ w 'o O O O rd 3 O U) � U1 U a) o O rl 3 O In O U r1 A O O r1 E M N a) 3 iJ c: ,aj � .0 O � S.". N py 0 fJ,r1 r-I A U �, 3 O O r1 a) a) m s~ � O bi M r1 a) U U1 N c . �+ m p 1J ~ S~ G 4 l niG4 O b (d X Q) U)U r4 1:1 Q. q oO U N �d 4-4 O O O O Z (d A a) U p O �4 �4 U 0 a) � H Idb U S~ U O Ul ( O Q) N (d x 1J 0ro �J U) 1J U O H -� ro Q P4' U 4w..1 °; O a) 'i' -M 'y rd )-I o P4 (d rd 4) CO w r- U O "r1 0 M 0 .r I U M `� r-I 4-44 0 a) o U O N U kJ .ro r-I 'O U) r-1 4J E U) (d w ro �+ U) U rJ �4 � Q) 4J o aJ o 04 Q) � -H w U o ° N W a) rd04JQ) � (d o0) � r� +' 03Em � 0 (n •r1U roe, o o $4 � A >IU U \ 4-)�4 U) � � .H -H (a w —i a m n N I~ U (U s� �4 U F. A N Sd r1 Q) 4-) � r-I U) 3 Q) H r-I-I Q1 0 P4 Q) O 4-3 �4 I~ -rI V 0 �4 -HQ) Q) U) 0 � 0 M � Q) 44 O � 4) rd U) A 0 U U OA O -H O O 4 o r•I O O Q) 4 4J P., A O 0 rci 1, r1 4 44 U O A S1 Q) 0 N w W H �4 UUE-1M UwU Eim •r1 E' U �4moa HOrtU (do a �-I N Z W .H o a (n U H U W .rl O U) � r•I U H H m U) H M H w a 44 a d) g ai Z CO w H H S4 ,7y 'd a.) U H Q) U1 C 4) Q) H Z U -1 U) "O Pa U Q) w w z H > a) , IH p; ro o � � o aH F Q E, H H CO � U U W L P O W O U) F o O U H P4 H O N rv�) W H �j U N P4 O P4 H -- P4 ,-q A,' PU 44 U) M 215 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope ,4 r1 rl rd = 01 r1 N N �4 �4 r1 O r-1 (d N O 4J r1 r' r O O r1 O ;✓ E �-4 4-) (0 U U1 - (d rd •r•1 M O 4-4 ::l ,A pa Qa O U1 3 -H O N 0 4-1 Fi 10 4-I �I 4-I 4-I rl 71 (d N S4 N Ul N O O 4-4 � N �-. N 11 O rl ,� U J-1 J-7 rd O O U N N � rd O N 14 r-1 C U U N N N rd E O U A m 0 3 � �4O0 O bl rd ¢+ O .� .04I N ¢, 4J a-) U � O N O r ?-1 14 4-1 O i31 o U U En a) 3H b U1U U1 N O W0 rd 3 M N Q-, 010 U U 4J Ul � N 4J U it U N �l A 0p O 1~ U1 U � O -ri r I �4 N N r rl 'H N rd OU 0 O p,yr o 0 U O ¢ 0 X i✓ rd r1 p o 0 � ¢ w a -H N O N � � 0 u\ u` U ,4 U �+ O rQ M � -ri �'-. �-I �r rl M (n lfl o a�1 '0 w 0 � ro rd 4-4 3 � 3 rG 0 - rd 10 -H. ;1 N � � �-) a ko 04 n a) 0 -� 1~ rd 11 N W N A N N U1 H 'ri ro 'H ro CA O C s~ 3 ul rd q M O 'r l �4 rd U1 � H ro ; 3 N N rl N r I ro U O H -r 1 04 � rd M U1 rd O � � � (d n O •11 O (dO Id d m _ }4 O rd 41 r0 4-4 �1 f-1 � N N rl � O O ? U1 N 1~ 11 1~ 4-) O U rd s OO� U1U -H a O O —1 '' � U, rl rl p, �' r1 .,� U1 U1 w U O U1 �+ rl N r J 0o H O �; U }1 U1 Ul 11 U O (0 rd rd a �1 O (d Ei N N 11 rd � '� (d ?A � o m a 4J U O }U1 U O O O rmn Ol N M 4� N W N ,aj J.1 O N s~ '� r1 0 N 0 W O W O O w Q 4-1 "'� ,i"i ' 11 = U M -0 Q � '� •H N 4.4 ¢+ (d rl -r•1 o U O O m m U o N (d 0 0 r 1 (d 0 � ro P4 ( r1 •� Ft � - � � � � M -mil o U +� 01 0 �4 N r� N U U O 0 U U U ro rd O UU U ?4 O P! rl A O 4 rl W r1 -r•I -r•1 �-1 O (d rd rd (d 4-) rl U U) (d E•r O 4-1 P U) X A W N iG 5 W U W N W 04 U1 4-4 U n5 N a H (d (d .-1 rd N 0� rn 0 dl Z31 F E� a cn o a o � z w E, $4 N 0 a w � W U U ,O z N a o yF:� O W x oa h LC7 04 Q F U) U > w N a rn E C, H N H rA 0 U H U W L` Z U =It 0 0 U ° H •• °z E H q 0 H W A H 0 U U m W F q lx O IX x H �H W a F:� W CIA w (Yl 216 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope bl (d a) 5v a) C,' a) 4-) W W a) W a) ii >1 A 1-) A O OA Fi O �4 - -W4 - 4 P4 3 •r1 G4 a-) 4-) 4J '0, -r•I 4-3 .r-I (d 0 �:I �4 •ri -I-) �4 4J 4-I J..1 �4 •H 44 -r-1 -r1 -H 4-7 ri �J 0 (d 1) �I O a) a) W 0 U U U U -r-1 --1 �J W �> ror-I 41 4J U O U O -H O ro O F! rd ro (0 3 ro U r-I a) r-1 r-1 �4 H O -H 44 o O r1 04 o P4 0 a) ro r� � UU) ro � 4-4 x � 4a � O N �-. G4 U N �4 a) W a) U W OU 'd � 4-4 tm 1~, r) U U U a) riO4 rd -H 4J HUU W 44 U44 A A A 4J 4J U rd r 4-) r♦o ~ U O o00 3 (d3 U O W44 rd 0004-4 4J�0 U 0� (6Ln N Lh ) U -1 (1) 4-) 4 O O O O U) `� O r1�o U ' r a) P4 rn 4 e 04 a) -1 O �U C, a ro ar])l ro U HO rn U uQm uQLn EQu = H -H � O � pi 0 fro Q) vEi U O ro o W 04 � Q � r1 0" O O 0 p � C r1 �4 � a) o o I o 0 1 0 1 O I H (d a) .3 0, 0 a) O a)cl � Ln o N M W a) W a) W a) U1 W a) 4J (6r° ro 3 0 a) O O r J un r 0 M '� M P � U O rd -r-1 Id 4J A •� .A �4 S w W N bi U)i 01 (CNIten M E o y U N �� r-I U U s~ O W H 04 U 0 -H P! -,1 1~ -,1 ro a) � d a) -H a) � � 04 � O O O 4J I 3 0 rd O I r, -11 '� -rl '� -11 '� ,� W �4 �. ld I~, O J, ri a) 'H a) O —1 r1 U) a) r1 r1 4) -1 a) � , a) O a, � M O , U r I a) U U) P4 a) ¢+ a) P4 a) (d ,A U O a) (d r-I 4 �-I ((dd , ro (a M 4 O (d O z O N 3 r� 0, �4 M a) 3 O (D rd a) P4 4) 1•' }-I 4J UI l4 CA r 4 lA }•I }-I I r-1 r O O ri r-I r-1 U r' O U1 1 W a-I 0) W - A ro 4--) (d � (d -W � ro a) � (d -4 � r-I 4-) � O S~ -H 4J 0 —11~ a) a) a) +J ro r 1 N x r1 rd N r1 ri •r cx r1 C�' r1 c� ri Ud 4 Un (d 3 a) r1 0 a r-I ro ro a) ri ro ro (d rd 4-) a) � r-I EQ >~ U ,o �+ a) �' P4 w �4 aa) � s~ � G � � � ro � Uv � O (droa) � WU3 w O � a) O � v roa) roa) roa) (� >~ U � ri +-J x O (d (D � (d a) � �4 H l) � -r-1 O 4J a) a) (d -H N 4-) �4 U � t\ O 4-) N � -1-3 O 4-3 O 4-1 O O F! -J � U a) rd rd ?'4-4 4-4 a) 1) \ H 0 r-I _ U 0 1J W O 0 O � J% � � � � UO � W 0 In 0 o w f� H '0 04 44 —1 W G4 04 rs+ 04 44 Q a) � •H H 4-4 � � 0 � � 1~ a) 4J O U1 O H (d O P! a) 4-4 (d a) 4-4 4-4 44 W (d a) 4-1 -H U (d -H 4-) �I a) M O P,' �A O (d ,� �-I r1 a) 0 a) 4J J-1 4-4 '� •rl �-I r' ?i 4-1 r-I a) 3 ,Q � o Ol (1) r,, H o U) o OD O �4 W W M a) (d r-I 4-4 W a) ;J 91 -r1 U) ? W ;J 1 o 1 �> -H 1 o 1 o 1 o (D I �4 ,� 4J4-) O 44 04 �4 O O 44 C Q W O W 0) �4W N W O (d W N W N W N a) 00 W) C rd A (1) O0 E 1 W 1:4 0 0 P4 U U 3 0 I„I 0 W -ri -r•I a) W -r•I -r•I -r•I �4 4 N �4 r a) P40 Q) r� 4J U -H -�•I � �� U OU �4 P4 O a) r 1 rd W O 0 0 a) \ W • 104 O l) • • FC • • • A W W U ;J 4-3 H -H • • • U (d ro 04 H (a ro � .r.1 0 U 0 W m d a) a3 rn �] (d a) U EO 4-3-3 Q) ru Ix a�i 4 z o E, W m C4-) a) w W rd w o Ix •� '� U ro � w w v a m z � W W O ro O ? FC O (� H h r� CC7 Q rH h W E� H H U] 0 U U W L ' Ei L4 O Z U •• o N U � Ei •• �4 r] FC ]C rM W E-� W' O W' �,"' H \ W a Q,' W ram, U) M 217 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope (1) a) a) -W r-I .9 4 (D U) �4 (1) �4 'C e x _C: �4 ,q I~ H a) U o bi a) a) rn s~ O a) 0) Q -ri a) a, � 4J � o ro � a) o a � -I-) s -H �4 4-) s~ ro 4J : o U O 4 3 r-I 4 r-I r-1 4 -rl O rd �5 (d rd �?: 4-) w U 44 OP-I E �' 'o k U 3 E 4J Pa 4-4M P4 -� a) w -H rd O 4-3 m 7:1 a) X � uO� �+ 00 �4 U r-1 ) � O U2 O w u-4 �4 U) . U O �4 Pa s o w U4 4-4 O Q U) � U)Pa U 44 mo O rl 4-4 0 O U1 r-I a) o U a) U) rd �+ rd Pa S O o r� 4 4-) -H U O 4-J ri C 4-) x! m O�4N .0 o � r�I U) 4J N O O N 3 � g -ri � r-IO N Pa u0i (z rd U r I 11 0 .� U O O 3 11 44 r-1 CrNd 3 U�a) rroOiU O 4J xi O Ow +J +J a > a) a) r � L 54ID � O 4-) O04 ul 5 +J P�� 04J 0 4o " P4a rd �'d rd H 4J � a) U o 01 U � O 3 +O-L ¢ w U � o a) Li 0 rd E U 4-) A g a rd O rd m A M 4J rd rl p,-1 S i rd 'd O O a) a) �4 F1 U a) 0) J r rd O� U O4-) M U to 3N Op Pa pl w p rd _1U N Ol ( R+ rd �� U W I~ N O 3 U I~ 0, U 3 I~ 3 3 a) H � P, g 3 Pa I~ I~0 4J a) r04 rd O p kJ rd 4) rd a) H O O O ZO rl r i •rl P! M > G4 4-) � a) E C! rd 4J a) N -� 0� F O U (d � rl O (d p � p .3 A N U � N N (d lUJ � �I a) U r I a~ Ol }4 O a) �I a) rO —1 F! rd 4J � a) a) 4J O H rd ?-I � O I~' � 44 ri U � rl •• N 4J -rl r-I tD 3 -rl I 4J -r-I a) � O P: > � U 4 rd `o `o to l0 W U 4 rA i✓ G' > Pa-r-I 4J r-I G' �4 U o U a) U a) �4 w rl 0 a) �4 a O o Pa ) � � U R U) � M m i a) •rl ? rd a) �+ rd •rl O O ?4 a) I~ pi M O M rd 4-4 N Q a) M E-I U J U) .04 U Pa J r I Q4 q) U o U U Pa M 'O rd H 3 � U 4-4 U rt W 4J rA a.�-) 4-)O a) o, tP Pa 0 � -H IV0D 04 -40 a-I -1 4-) I~ ro Pi Pa $4-.I o X rd 5 U 1J rd U r-I ro fI •I R -ri ,S; ro a) N co . CV �J Pax FC 3 rd U) p H w U a U � N a1 ro � .H o U •� U1 OHl 'd a) 4J rn 17 ro N U EQ a) �r1 �1 F � `Oz w � H Ei H JJ U �S U a) w r! v a) P: P: W r4 Ga ,Si H U a) Pa � Q,' H H a a s ro w h 4) 0 Q) U a a m �l 0 0 0 0 0 0 E, H Ln Ln IV H CJ) Ln Ln Ln 04 U O O rl U W L` U H P •• Z E H N (D N A N \ o U U rr`) a w Q N P: O P: ]--' H �>, w a FC Pa [IA r) r) 218 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope Q) a) [n 'd Q) - 0 (I-I • (1) ''O a) • (1) �4 Ol'd rd ,' M X! M r• �4 w a) 'd �4 O O w 4 r. 4 E r-I a) w 0 a) 1~ JJ ;r S i S~' 1J � Q) (d �:I a) rd -r•I a) rq O �4 xJ (d 1J O -r-I 4-) 1J -H -0 (d -r-I a) a) -A -r-I $ �1 r1 r1 � 9 d 4J � a) O -1-) (0 s~ 'o O 3 4 J P4 4-33 SC >~ O O (d p +-) +J � U 3 ,H A � m P4 440 Q -H -r1 � a) rd a) a) r-1 � d E -H -H w >, O W Hu4 (d 04 AdN40 4-3 a) � Q) Aqw U O r-I + ��I +O( s~ w �° a) a) '� b" SAC a U ° " Oi rl rt a) ° (0 ° > ri . U r 1 O U q) a) 3 � � rtQa,Q m (d `� w4U ( � a) � S � � Uw �"4 �a)2� � a) U as 3 3 N C p U ✓s a) rd E ° O a) a) 0 � 44-) w U k a 3 N ° Q ", a) w •� w in a� �40 ''� a) O 14-) � ° r1 �4d U N � w Q 4-3 04 m 3 r1 a) U O H U (d(a rdN b� 3 O N N q N s~ a) 3 N '" Q' � a, a) r-I d -r"1 U a) J� a-' rd -ri J 1 ''I ' U r I G U] O ri M U d ' 1 Q M w 0 N S U1 rQ 3 Q rt S r-I 'd �4 U 04 O rd a � m ° , r1 0 a� a) (6 -r� a�i m0 04 � N 91 -�1 Q - 1-1 .� H U S4 .3 N O �4 (0 a) rd to U '� (d a) x � 4J H �40 3 X () -W a) }, U > rd •ri m 3 � 00 U] 4-) (d u-I r-1 _1 ,x' +J J-J J�-J U) ,.l a) �4S~ J"J a) a) 3 a) X 3 a) 44 , E O 1~ (b O a) U O -H w tS" d ,H O �4 �4 1~ O N to -H rI r i N O 4-1 w G'a �' -O a) ` O 4..) 91� -r01 rd ,4 M Q ,5 U -H �, 41 z rk1 m w d ((dd F -H rt -r-II N r '� O rI CO a Q 0 a-) 1~ -Q O G4 ° a) aJ x W r i rd C7 a S� r� M a as O O O 1~ O U Q— O H r1 O W CI ,04 V) i✓ a) (-," a) ,4 ° Q Ei ri 'd �i 3 Ul ' a rd to �i a) M O w a ;J W -r1 O E✓ a) O r1 O ? a 'd ri a) F! a) (d Q -r1 r-I a) (V r-I � o U rd a) M 0 ° ° U H QLJI~ a -r1rdoJ, a) ° � 05V - I 0) U) �4 - ro 1~ b)•ri w }a (d 4-) (d to M 0 O 1~ �4 a) � �4rO d~ m O (d O 4-4w 4-3N w 4J J —1 0 w �4w N k U U a) 0 ° 1~ U A -H H rd a, a) -r-I A 3 A Q l0 A •ri O -r1 U ,Q a) 4.1 .,1 �" •H -1 o x r1 4J 4-J w -ri (d m 'd (d P (d W 0 a) •r.1 W '0 r1 w iJ (d a) r� 1=,' a) U 0 •r•1 a) p (d 11 r-I (1) 1 w a) -r1 -H -r-I a.J w (n A m h 04 3 3 w 0 U] (d H � � 3 • � U (d N LL H `� z (0 r, O o d N 4-3 rn PEI U) Q) H H w ld 1J 4 M 0 L� AI adi w Q rO +J H w U1 C � Q) 3 (d (d M -n r-ili r I U ,U � H v a H ro ri X z O ? U O 0 h w Q N a H H H (n � U U W L H L4 O z U O o HU H •• z H O N h F[; M CN rv�) W H �j q CN W ,-q FC P4 44 W M 219 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 1=.' • �4 O MO rd - • ti~ >1 Pa >v r I rd >v �4 3 a) U -11� -A LL a) JJ Z~ 4-3 a) W �-I rd r-i O �4 r I q a) JJ O r-1 a) O m �4 • 4-) .H . aJ �4 a) ,! Pa O a) td rd 4-) .r.l H Pa aJ r-1 a) O rr) W rd A O t a) 4J 4-) Pa r-I > rA 3 U) Pa (d u-4 r x �-I - 3: �-! 4-) cd �J � W E >, �4 �J 3 -'4 a, (D Q a) �4 � a) M 3 a) W to H a) U1 rd v a) m U 4-4 U O 4-) U � r-I -H _ 1� a) � r a) 0)a, a) E t 44 s~ Pa � a) 4 4) O � .r.i ~ W E 4)� 1 rd Q rQ O _0 a) s~ +� 0' t5' U) O E O a) N U Pa � >. ~ -ri P,> O" W a) N 4 � w w r-4 04 W .r > U rd O �+ E M A 4-) rs O 3 4-) 1~ 4 Pa a) 4--) � > E O O W Pa p, O 1~ •H ri 3 •1,, O 0 4-) � a) a) a) � �' Pa� W N Ul rl 0 U X � N E ro Q) M 4-) a) 0 0 0 P4 4-4E a) Q) q rl a b� 1 00 44 a) H (D 1~ O ¢, a) ry H r O aJ •ri Pa rl N Pa ns A 4 W W � Q) H rd � x O H H ri r U] (a O O � 04 04 0 i M SI ' ¢ 4-) � a) 0� pa ` O ( oU � J-' 4-) 04-" r rc$ Ua N a (d N F Wap O 0 a) . 04O NU °lo �4ran mom' W (a0 sAroa CO +J � � E 3 U � Is U) 44 Pa O >1 a) X N rd rd � rA a) k, U 4 � O � � � � .� a) � JJ O 1'. -w O H E .r.1 rd a) a) � � V) r� x �, O 04 � P+ 3 'd � S~ a) Pa O 44 4 Pa U rd > (d rd H r i aJ � O a) 1~ a) N r0 a) � � Pa rO +� 44 3 � w 3 (d N 4) � O � � P, a) r1 W a) '� � '� 3 a) N a)ro -W U a Q x Q E � r Pa N V� � 44 N aJ 44 S ro JJ ,A 14-H � G � rd O 3 rq a) Q) 3 Q) rd P+ r J (d • 1 - 1 J-) U N N a) r I S 4 U U JJ a) O '4 W � 4 � " Pa 3 W o W W >> � m -ri a 4 a � 44 r-1 r-I o ro C (0 4) � O U a) r1 E U E U a) ri 3 r� O � N E JU-1 a) bl -H JJ r-I a) rt N O H H � ro '�' U O 1:1 � � Pa rla) � a, m � � � a w N 3 ro � x44 � � 0 N � m q Q w _ � U � �4 O 44 � N W ro � -', .. .0 .� U w � r-I � O U O N ,d O � a) � Pa w z OU (d a) � ,d �+ � r-q (a r+ �4 you, H � OH >~ a to a) a) aJ rd +-) � a) r0 a-) � a) 3 \ a) rd 1~ a) . .ri 4J W a) ! 1~ (d +u O a) (d (d a) 0) JJ O FA � ro U .,� E E (d a) " rdU W ri �, ro s~ a) a, Pa r~ s~ r 0 H �J 4-) -H (1) �q 3 3 44 a) -A a) N (n Pa -H �A H a) 44 r•, a O O [n > 4-3 (1) s~ E Pa m 3 3 �+ R 0 rd O r-I a) 'A > ,1 o U a) U H O O (a 4-3 4 a, o -HE a) z x x 4-) 4-) 0 ;J U 04-) (d (1) U rn w U r) O �-+ >, a) O >, 0 O o M O N A x 04 a O a) a) a) � V O (d � � rd 44 N Q ,� (d - A Pa U) r0 x A (d x 11 E -W a, x � 4--) (d a U 3 W Pa A O rd 0 0 w o 04 (� U w \ W . . . is U (� N r4 ro CO ro � .H 0 U •ru rn rd a) 4-) rn h (d N U � -) Q) F U 43 a a�i g z H 4J U �S U a) W r~ 4-) a) rdI W On U (d U 10 �-4 � 04 a) U) O N U F] G4 0 04 Ll F F H H En 9 U U W L` U H E z E H N o U U W a uE) N a O 64 H >1 \ w a r.� 04 rIA r) ri 220 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope W 9 M >i m U • �4 ,1 E a) r1 U) '0 'd U) rl 91. >4 U) 4-3 �4 a) � O rd q A a) m 0 O a) rd v 4 r1 H a) a) 4-3 rd 4--) a) 5 C U) a) N �4 Q) •rl U a) a) O �4 a, aJ rd (d U) 4-) -H �4 rl ! O a) a) V 0 g a P4 > r- M r0 > O rd >~ to 3 E 1 O rd 3 -H a) > Ea O W 4-3 a) >-, O N r-I U � a) �4 r I 3 W O a a) ',441 w -� U U U -W o rd O 3 a) � � ( 1:i-H tp � H a) rC N (d A > Ui w 04 41 ?i 41 a N O O '� 4J � N d O -rl .d � rd O rd O 0 '� N a) -,1 � U u) ro O �� a) 0 3 0 .3 E rd :~ o �" rl U 3 rI �` rd A N W •r 1 U O 0 4i a) 1 .0 O H 0 '1 a) M m U `4 ' � � 0 � � 3 X O n � —1 4-) � O � - rd U2 0-I" N a) >1 s m O .0 O � N m o r� 3 rd 04A .r IH Q) rd W — O U s~ m 3 r1 —1 m 3 J-) r a J_) 4--1 rd a--) -rl a) a) a -rl a) O J-) a) r--I � 'o -H rd O 5 N N 4 p rn O 04 0 A a) � w W (d 04 U 4-1 '� O U -r1 � �04 � A rd rd > � r� 3 � O '� U O vi 3 U rl O ro U o �' Q) a) F: r1 E, rd m � A O U q 41 U rl a) -rl � a) r-I M+� .r I r-I a) a) . 0) 1~ -H �A s~ FC w ti~ rl U? a x �� a) `� U O a) .r1 3 'd O E M vi LL' E '� a) J-r M a) a) ',I.' a) � w N f-, I✓ a) (d a) io 3 O E Ul a >''Q a) U U W E rd w a U O +J U vi k A a r1 a, .� cd O cd U U) N p -H � 4J w � ¢ rd r1 rl q a) rd -H a) a) w o o ts' 3 4J � O a +� 3 0 ro as w b1 U A a-) W N 4J 8 1~ 3 W U a) I~ � of 'd ,� i✓ A Q , I rl 4-) 4J 4-)H U -H a) 3 O U .r 1~ 1~U) `4 H N -1 O >1 .rI —1 rd G U) U rd M O 04 rd Er Cl O -4 4-1 a) W 4J •rl J-1 U (1) -rl E� PQ �I •rl U1 O rd �A o H �I ri ?i Ir �A C.' E 4 w U F! W W rd E� 1 C.' O ri ;J U),—I rd I~' 5 W a) (1) M rx 41 W a) a) a) rd -4 -H04-rl (1) 1 �A r-I (1) r-I 0 (1) -4 ;:5 Q) a) -4 4-) .r-I 4-) � o U 0 a � a �4J r-I 4J ) U > .rl rt it M (1) r-i (a r-1 O a rd U U) 4-) rd q X a) s~ E M rn U) O 0 rd rd 1~ ?-I ,O rd -r1 a) �4 �4 O rd ¢4.r.1 rd r-I rd �4 51 044 rd O I~ 4 O .r1 4 rd N >1 4-4 (N Q U m 3 W -ri rd 4-) QQ 3 A rO Q 0) O 3 A a S rd 4--) rd M > x -H m U 4 4-) U) O o W4-3 N 4-) ° b m U � N a H ro FA rd U o .r.1 W 6H1 d a) 4-3 rn F] rd a) U U) 4-) Q) F rd a' d) g Z �4 >1 'd +) ri 4.) U �I U a) m C +) a) rd r' ri rrd-I O M -n U rd U 'U �-4 NU a 'b o � � o h w Q N E� H H p) 04 U U W L Ei L4 O N U 0 Ei •• � � H � h FC x U) W P, W' O W H a l ry' a 44 W (Y) 221 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope a) �4 -'4 0�-I1''d r a) r-1 O w a) �4 a) Pa J-) 4-3 a) �4 54 r I a) a) U 0 a) H 4-) (d l-) O 4 •r•I a) O �4 (d U) a) N a) J-) rl r I �4 01 J-) -rl •r1 (d U) U 4) (d JJ ;� �4 (d H I:i rc 11 ::l (d fd O P (d r�" Pa r I (d J-) rd JJ JJ U -H O J-) ro �4 3 J� O C U U }C O �+ O i rO � 3 4-3Pa E O �4 (d �4 4J -11 O 0 -r-1 4-I J-) A X-1 4-4 r1 O J� i a) 3 (d r I 44 •r I O rd ( H O p ate) v .•H O V N -� (d N O 3 N .� Pa � O H P O �4 r-1 VIE 44 O + rn (d X 4 r1 3 O E N C r1 O O H - U2 p W _� � 4-4 U a) rd 4-) .,� rd O O 4 a) rcl � o E 3 3 0 +-4 Z71 j4 bl 0)44 N r � u0i � -H � � .� O 34 � � O O � •� �O 4.a rdAS � FO 4-) N � 0 C!ro U (d U m -rl �4 a) J, (D a) (d O 3 (0 O a) rd o U O > s~ �4 91 +.)US~ 3 U) ' a) O � 4a a) (nN a)'d r1 'Q 44 4-) r a) UO O M U ua)) •4r4 `� O J) l rl 4J (d +J >,r-I -r-I 1.)EQ Q a) a) r-I P' W �J', (d a) rl O �,-1 (a j a) 4J M �4 U g '� N N 'H Q) m E � 3 � •� o O U 4J rd 44 � (d JJ � U1 r1 rd P � U? r-I � p x E rq 3 1~ 3 3 x � r-I 3 a) � C) 3 M o J, p N O >~ —1-I b) 04 PJ 3 t0!] 4 ro 3 M U) N N b U o S ia 'r4 H w rI a) N >, U . 1 � M 10 44 Ei w 0 G � w 4' H JJ r-I Pa 4J p, O 44 O M 3 �1 C 3 � M 3 Q1 Pa r� _ a � �' EQ Jai M �+ 3 a) o m O s~ O sa vi O O O cd O N � S~ rl a) a) U ~ P+ M '� H f5) U) •r-I J-) V J-) Ol.r-1 a) ?4 >:31 G' 4-) (d W a) .,I -r-1 W J-1 ,y'-, �"-, rd O \ F a) G' S~. W •rl F'-, 1~' 1-1 N J-) F,' (d a) ri �4 fd —I U J-) M 0, O PJ ?,•rl -r-I M m 0)-r.1 U m •rl .r-I Tn Ul U A PJ � . w � O •ri rn C q 00 H M PJ r-I 4-3 a) 'J C a) S4 5 �1 ro a) U (d rd U) � 1. O -rl 4-) r) x � -r-I a (d M U � H I~ U -H (1) r-I (1) 4-) Pa �4 Pa r-I >+ 4-3 � •,i -� o U ( -r I � Pr r� M U O ro P � 0 (d P � -H 4-) M rd 4-) a) rd 'O rd a) (n 4a N J-) rI rn m o I~ 01 0 ;J (d (d -r I R r4 r-I O J� -H J.-) ;J —I >, �4 O.�-I Pa �4 P a) 1.) 0 � � U W 4-4 N w 4J a) U) U r-I 4--) (d w Pa U U) o W m CO J-) 0 O H (d U) (d O ro m ;J O �o Q �4 01 rd 8 U (1) -r-I �4 to O id •ri �-I �-I r-I a) N Ul U] �'', J-) N Cai N (� w a) U a) a) ;J a.) 4.) O -r-I U) 4.) -r-I a4.) 1 M M O O A 040 P • -. U a) -r-I0r (d 0 �4 N 00 (dH U w \ co 3 �4 44 �I -H 3 • . • . 3 Pa is U M N (2L4 ri (u ri) ro � U .-' 0 U) OHl rd (1) 4-) 0) (n f7 (d N U W a) -4-)r1 Z31 F ri) v ran a a�i z w H N w rl � aU) 3 rd rd rJ) -n ri U 10 o a N a) 04 KC F � H � z N °o N U h N 04 H EF H H 9 U U W L` EJ H W 0 E H O N O U U FC ,-a u) N Q N P4 O IX x H �H \ w a r.� W CIA r) rl 222 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope (1) - I~ a) U) r-i N a) I~ N a) 44 �J 'd (1) d U) a) a) w a) Ol Ol U) bl U) 1 Q 4-3 ri A A O I~ 04 O O S~ >1 4 a) I~ •H �5 4 O 4 I~ I~ ro � '14 w ro U .r.l �A (d H 44 (d aJ aJ r-1 �J 1', 1:1 a-) aJ -r1 •1 tr 0 (d O �4 -,j 3 �4 P4 .1 ro O aJ a) N 4_3 ro w ro 0 O 3 3 +Ur (0 N - 1 rd w a) o O art ° U O m U � v `-4 'Cl ro 3 71 U � � � � a ri �4 U) �4 O U) ?4 O a) N �4U a) w m a) S~ N rd ° rd O O H LP -'� 4-) �' W �4 (d r-I (d JJ O +) 0 -H ro ro U � ° 3 Ul O (0 � M � U) U G4 U S~ a) a 04� - 1 4-4 � r. I~' a) r 1 1-) � _1 U, rl orn a � 0q)i 1 04 room ° w° o � ro � � � ro -� � ,�, � a4 roa) � o or, o >°'ro U � w . 1 Nrd 44 > � �4�O� U + NA rd UO o ! 11 J rdON q N . ro� ro � 04J o +- 3 � ro o °4J rd P4 o (d � aQ) Q) M E 3 a � (D S~ q aJ °U � � b bi A " a 5 -N -) � � ro x 'd a ro a3, .0 ro H,Cw ° 0) (04-) U t3' O C) o o . � (d �4 -1 3 ,J o 4J a� 0 3 IJ (d r� Ol O a) U U) 0 Pi aJ s~ ro Oi (d U a) 4-1 tn �Id' � W � O¢' O N O x � ro � W amJ-)U W U ro MH � 4-) 1 U a)� � •1 O a) td (d D N 4J 4-) (Z OZ 4 1 aJ O -1 s~ a) w M 'C -1--) � aJ rd I~ �40 O Ea oN rwx OA � 0H A ?i 0 ? A .3 41 3 O U H �' p P ro N m In ro M rd _1 � a) ~ (d ro O �4 0. +J .H n ¢ 4-4 ° �+ � U �a a 4� .4-) U (d N . O ) oa Ol >~ 44 a r000 � v � ro � 0) 41w � � � r-i0O a) 4_) o Q U •1 .1U0 �4 U 3 �40 ro ro (d (d (dr-i •1 U U 0 1 a) �4 4-) a) a) .1 a) _0 -1 r- 3 z0 M is �4 4-) -ri v 1J a) a) M ro P4r aJ a) (d r s~ 0 M 4-4S~ W a) •1 � ;:1rd a) 5 4-) ri s~ cv r 4 M O J-) U r-I 4-) JJ O 0 -H 0 O 1 U) -H W a) r4 1.1 1-1 a) U 1-) �4 4-) r•-I U) Ua) � •,1 Li (1) >, �4 0 O O .1 • 4 �4 O (d O O (d 1~ (d 04 �4 �_, (d (d ,o O • 4 (1) U) O O 4 r-I O O N N W w U) w •1 ri U 3 (1) ID4 U P4 U �I a! �A C7 0) H Z z H ri U) (n •rl 44 U 4-) 04 U � U ro N a ro •i1 o W U H E, V] .i1 d N aJ rn > W �] (d N U rEA v 1 M F C7 W 0 4) g z H H r-I4 o � a a a (d (0 U) n W PP4 U ° (d U ro �4K a v a 3 FC w ro -1 X z z U 'b 0 � � O H w h w 0 Q) Q F � Q4 E, H H V) a U U W L Ei P O F O W O En4 O O44 Ln O U H E, z E H O O N h F[; x U) W E, N N F� Q Ca � P: O PS FC H > P a FC PL 44 U) M 223 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope (V I C al �4 I•+ a) M r-i X m w �4 N �4 bi 3 �4 N 3 U r-I N �A a) -1 >4-H > 0 .H m 0 rl O a) w ri �4 .H x (V N a) rd 1~ 0 �4 r-I �4 0 rd a) -H -H Q �4 0 rd �:J rd ri N .r-I q q U O w 0 a) nj rd C a) rd 4 rd 3 �J a-) w -r-1 E a) -r-1 3 � v 4-) 4 E rn a, rd > (0 r-I it -,1 4-) , a) 0 1-1 (0 >4 00 p � 5+ � rd � 9 N > � 0 � r(d a) 1~ N -r-I4-4 -I O 0 0 ni rd U N O � m > Q U 0 >✓ N �4 }{ N m 0 d rd O U) a) U 0 v a) 0 0�4 O 0 m 4 4-3 Mp U4 U rn 0 U 0 r � U 4-3-, p 04 3 0 t j I a) U N >~ .Q J) J--) rn 04 a-) -ri rn a) U J) a) U) S 4 -�-' rd U rd E � •r-I ri rn 4 0 .. .� CO � � k A `o rn � a) m 5 _- r I -r-I w � d a) .,� � a) rd . 1 � bi � ri O Oi �' v A 4-) 0 � w O ; -r I � a) �4 M to r I o s~ s~ a) �:I rn a) 1~ i 0 � w O >4 NU O QNai cQ)n O d . O 0 wU U O(0 4 -! M 0 0 �4 0 H a) 0 p 04 N U N a) r I Q �4 a) O s~ U] rd O EQ 0 1-) 1~ dy-� -11 -ri �4 -H 4-) (d ,� a) r`I Co o N rI g 0 X .4r-i d N ? -A -0 U > w ) 4 A A �43 U 0 g 0 UO rd 0 U d � � � � � � 0 � � PO � A A+ M }4 4-) a) O (d o O 0 � a-) O a) to � g U rI ;:; J-) U Orii 3 uj vUwO r31 rI ro —1 (0 3p O 0 OU o 4 rdrd So �4 rd 0 0 � � � ¢+ 0 � rdU � O � mw � Ugi 3 U A .5-1 N .0 U) a) U w U p a) 0 W J J-) 4--) Q4 COr4 F �. a) - 4-3 +� N O (d pM � A '� U 47) i � U rdP! r. F� rn >, � U � a) � rd Z S~ r I i 3 F 0 S~ rn � U r-i O o) r-I r� U4 rI U d O 0 ron fz O cd 44 0 � � 71 -q 4' d l� O N EQ M 'd U .r-1 _ r4 0 a) 0 Q) o a) -r-I (n `+-1 a) o H d 0 rn (d U i~ +J O O d 04� H +3 .r 1 a) O O r o 04 a) M rt U a) O O -1 N q ro �-w 4 U O .'1 4 � � U 44 C a) d a) � 4) .1 r-i � A 0 � o w w w � U w ni U N U � Ei M U a) U U M rd m a) 0) � � � LWN w U) Q td ?-I � �4ni 3 H a) �4r I N r I 0 0 A O � p C Q -W 4--) 0 W _A w � � U a) 0 a) tP O >4r-I w - 1 w O s � ~ L), m U N w ri U. w I a) r- �4r� M s~ �4tD r--1 � U rd -a 1 0a) 4-3 > 4-) 4-3a) > O 0 rO 4-) rd r•-I .,i J-) r4 r-I a) 4-) a) (V U (d EQ O 5 1~ a) O a) �4 91 -H 0 a) m a) !I I~ 0 -ri P4 0 a) a) ri w U) 1~ a) 4J U OU ?A rd � O a) A ri a) 1~ o a) 1~ M 0 (0 o —1 o 0 a) rI o 4 a) w co Ei F:4 5 7J N ,Q 04-) 3 Ei a~ U 4 U u, U a) A A --i d N - U s n5 ro o a H (d F zn-,I ni u) W J U o Ei ri r V) `N rd N 4-) rn ui u 17 b N U C7 R+ H a) -rl �) Ei U] a a�i g z $4 � � 4 m p ti o_ �i r-I U 10 k Q) w ti 0 v U V 0 5 FC O 'yy�i H N h P40 a Q H x w ` a � � o Ln H En LO � U M U W L� U H P •• Z E H M CV H Q \ P4 O P4 x H �H w a F:� w rIA r r) 224 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope rd 014 N I~ N +1 4-1 ,7 �4 O r-1 N N Ul w r-1 ,7 11 f~ 4-4 N N -14 r-I q -�1 A O 4 (d M 9 -H I~ -4 U rd A �4 I~ (d 9 N U) O O H S4 �4 -rl ;:5 -r-I 4.1 4 4 > (0 "1 (d N N -r-I U > r-1 8 -0 O o s~ O rd 4., .0 A-) U1 3 " I~ r, 'd "I -r-I -r-I N I 41 (z 4J S 3 s~ W r1 ;J �4 N -ri w •rl r4 rd �4 +� ! O 4-) 0 -r1 (d ;:JrQ Q rd 44 r-I �4a.-) -� N N r4 a1 -1--) U1 co N 4� U1 ',4 O o •r-I 44 N Q M o N -H r`-I S ,� U1 N .,� Ul >,N rd N O p -r-I ro v � M -W 4-) U1 3 --I 0 O En U o -rd ¢ 8 N 11 N (d N Id rd o A � 0 N >1 N E 1 O r 4 M 5+ U1 d ,� •'� (d U) U) '� C'. >'' ni ''Q Cl,r-I -�l 'd J-I ' rd tp 3 U -'� ,1a ro 0 N ' r-I U) 04 (d N N () r-I O r1 3 �4 •r1 rd �1 rd J-) d O S (d o O 3 O � O � (0 N (di O Q)�4 Ui I4- O H -r1 (d rl H r4 O (d 04 4-) M 4-) U 4-) �4 N N � d , � (d �40 r1 A o(d o o o 1 N U QW) U � v � A O� r4 a-J 4-) ✓o dNSt~3 1 rcl U) 4-( N U) (d �4 -� r-I -rl -ri (d rd J-, JJ 4-) (A (d r-I -r-I N U1 -A 4-I ,-I !-. 3 ,. �' (d N (d U ,�.., r-I ,si 'd I~ 44 -ri Q �1 41 rd U N O Or-I 3 3 N 0) I I N U �+ N A aO) N N 4 � N y1 N (d (d d C1 4-3 O xi N 4-♦ i N r-i N Ln co Q �1 0 N N U rd 04 U1 � 3 r-i M � � � N U Ei �r1 4,, a1 4a N � � U - �r1 O v 4 d g � t�i1 � � s0 O d 3 0 bl 4� ,� r4 1, Q � U ' 11 �. (d U1 Q r1 Q rd 4-1 r4 E N rd x QO 4-3 CO ��. Q N '� r•4 N 4-4 U1 ,� N ' ' (d 71 .0Ql Q '� J-) 4J O p O N �- d i �1 d r-I rcl O � Jv rZ4 3 N N (d O (0 H 4-3 A O U F14I~ S~fd I~ U1 r- N 4 d 41 U O W o N OO F: r4 N 0 �'• H (mod >, N -1-) O ,Si ri 41 (d r-I r4 41 U �4 r-I Q o ro -r I al N O w (d O N U1 N H (d f �, U +1 3 d o t~ -H d 4-4 Ea Ul U (d rt (d O -,� ri (d -r-1 N IJ) U1 .,1 'r-1 N r-I O (A N �-I 3 -r-I •rl 3 O H r-IU1 rd r•-I O UI H Q r-1 N N 4-1 N ,�-I N N U1 11 r1 11 rd M o U rd (d O 'J N U 'd 4-3 04N �" N r' U) 3 dl 7 r-I �1 d (N W N rd (d O 'd 0) � � � ;Jni N�-I o -W 'r1 � �4 � r•I U O 4-) rd 4-4 N I~ .,-1 (1) w l0 Q ,ia U U 4J Q) r. ,� 91. �'-, 9i 0 4-) H '� —1 Q) ;J >, (d 5 W U -r 1 �"-, 4) J', r4 U O 4-) r-I 4-) -HU N U U o G". 4) N (d S'-, ,Q r-I W 4-1 � r-1 ,4 � U N Ln (d H 4-301 (d 91 r4 U) r4 04 rc$ -ri 01 3 '15 1J-) Q-, ;J 4 " -4 (d r-I 14-) 01 4-4 N W U S4 r4 0 U 0 ;J o ;J N �i 5 N ni N N Q) o 0 O 4 -H 0 N 4) N 4a 41 U OU O N N -r1 O -H o N N U) N Q) S~ d r•4 (d o k 4 N 4 4 4 r1 N r-I �4 U 41 U E1 (d U 0 A 3 I~ Pi -r1 41 U1 rd E 04 a) U U 41 w Ei 'd U � ro CU r-I ro (0 .H o U -ri 6Hl U) d N a1 rn F] (d N U EW-, U] J Q) F cf) Ei U4J � a ,4 U1 O Ei W a rO +1 < �4 w N ai � Q) x F< r-I (n o w S U ro �-4 a Q wQ) a, a ro o o z H h r� Q N u H H H V1 a U U W L Ei L4 O N U HH Ei •• H h F< x U1 W E-, r W O W H P4 ,-q A,' LL 44 W M 225 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope N rl • (1) J--) 7 a) r �4 r.. N 4-) ri Q) �4 fQ a) a) �4 4J -S� rd 4-4 4 -r I A rl rd -r4 O 5 a) �4 O 4 a) a) 9 4 N ro �4 H U O P rl Q -r4 rd -r4 -r•1 a) rd N �4 4J 1a U O 4, ro O -r4 O Q4 'd -r4 �4 J-) �-1 44 5 4J �:I rd E rd �9: 4-3 �4 W a) X 4 td rd 1a O r. 04 04 �4 'd a) U) -Ho U) U O W U) O SC4-4 N N � �ri a) rd �+ 41 U 4J qr aA i ] —i N � >1 H 44 i N a) Q U � U (a 3 A .� U Ca U U O rd N 0) H ate--' � rd En N s~ cd rd 8 4 a) � a) ro O N U N 1) F4 r s~ 4J Q) a) M N � 04 M Q rd �4 x 3 N 'd � s~ A U A M a) rn — rd v m W a) 4 a) rd ~ H - a1 a) � r O r � Ur > a) Q 3 OU a) r „ O rd H �Q . 'd r-I J-1 � H 4-1 r`I x H O ¢4 Q) >1 O H ro r. Ul rd � a) w O �4 Q a) 4J 3 L: �4 ,-! a) ,� .H a) rl O rd UI '4 rd P4 44 -W 3 d a) O 4 rA O Q •H MH N rd W .r4 3 x v v 3 O U] U � s~ r 4-) >, a) Z m q a) H y 4J rd H rd 4, d r EQ a) rd 1~ al 4 00 O rl � S 3 �i O � >, Ui 0r-i � 'H 41 � ) -,J 0 UUH � 04 r. �) 1 a w0 `d V U � W .'� �i •O a) > 44 a) -H4 rr-I U .� ,�-� `d J�1 N U z r� z U C 3 �4 v M A III0 d d rd d w O H O O rA rl -A 44 W 3 rd a) U 0) U r. (1) \ F 04 o 4i 4J d Q4-) O O rl M U O d � Z -H rd rd 4, o H Urd Q4 � 3 ) a) 3 a) o i✓ O H d a) 3 O rn p U ,7v M � N .'� ,t-I Q r) ,� �-I '4 a) `d -r-I 5y r-I >1 �JJ Q cQ S4 O H a) is 0 a) Zs Q 4 H cd is U la4 O µ4 CN W rd U O M d s~ 4J 4J C ri a) >~ O O �O Q N �i a) •r-I -ri 4J ,4 ,7r U) -r4 rQ N W Zi �4 -W 3 H M Q) a) ,Q r-I r-I '� 'd ,54 0) ?4 H �q a) cd a -S4 J-) 1 'd Q4 r-I a) a) �4 'd Q4 r-I 'J Q4 Q) U rl H P: r-I �I �', O C) N U Q4 U) rl O a) 0 —1 �4 4J � 4-) C (d rI O a) Q4 Q) Q) Q -r1 H H rl Q) •r•I O FC UU >1 l4 34 O O P ,� rd O O M H 7S O A 4 ;J 4 '&1. Q 7J -r4 Z 4 rd rl O N cQ F:4 Ul m H H U U PQ - 3 U x 4 5 04 x rd H M 3 H 3 w 3 a) 44 a U � N QI H (a rd � U ro a) 4J rn �7 fd N U a) -H C) F a ° CO 43 o w cn cn H 11 U �S U U] W Ul U) (6 U) -m W O r O U] U] U ro �-4 N w a a �4 rh a r9: rx O F F44 U ro X Z O w o w N U o h Ga U x Q F x x U U) EF H H � 9 U U W L` U H H •• Z E H N H P4 O P4 x H \ P4 a r.� w [IA r) r) 226 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope a) a) 'd (d ,4 a) 4 ''0 a) • 4J 4-3 (d a) O � > A a) �4 Q 4-1 a) 4 1J -r-1 a) -r-1 'Cl r-I W r-I X44 J.J � rl 4J o -r1 4J Ea (d I~ ri > rP ?a -1J -r1 �4 0 4J ",j U H In O r q (d �I 4J W U 1:1 1:1 � 4-1 N 3 4J 'd "3 1OJ (0 � 4-)rd U O 44 rd � � O rd " O W a)ro rd 4� v J- rl „ W 04 a) O a) F" 0 -H 4J N 1J 0 'o O U 0 0 � O r-I p 44 •'� -r-I J-1 a) -rl (d a) r. 'd (d .� 4- W 1J 4J W 4-1 r= �4 N ;:J r1 W >~ d ~ O O '004 04 rd W Oa N O O 4-3 rd N ��4O O r ~ � a)A �04 M0ii O - rd a) � s: 44 (d 4-) O W 4-4 "�'�. -rl ( 0 �:I .HN -�r1 O d ) o S '� a) >J -� o � N E Q, O 3 O OU 3 U rd W -0 O 0 � -H r-I �44J 0 �4 73 W $ n " r N r r a) r W �4N O OO � 4-3 E 4-) - rd ., O O � ni -ri M a) °o 0w (d0 TA ° MU .11 04 a) o �4 O 4-3 rI W a) 1J -rl H Sy N a) O U O -H F rd a) H C X O aJ O -r I a) H U 3 �+ 3 r . O r� o ,�-I L: j) r 4 '� W �4 rl '� 0 0 J-J W P4 U rd x o S" N �'+ r�I r-I 'o � w r- 3 M 1-J � W U O U N FO 0 04 0 �4 a) N _M U EQ � 0 3R: 1J U O U > (d (d r-IU 0 0 � a) O s~ U aJ W aJ O N Ow rd r-I U �,' W 0 U H F U rd 44 04 r1 s~ �4 � � U A xJ U 1~ � 4-3P!0 � J A O a) p4 Z (d 4-) U 0 H U a) ,� J-J 0 0 �{ -H -0r-I ! � "H • W M'd U W J-1 0o H Fi >1 (id 00 (d d N rd � H N r-I 'd W •r M U 0 a) d W M � 1J W W M V 0 0 0 M � 9 O J.J o U) ti~ 0 a-) " ro U (d � r, 3 •r1 U •r-I H -r1 a-) cv Q 3 w r 4 rd � a) a) -r1 0 1J 4-3 0) W W a) 0 -r-I 0 W W a) � r-1 U � (d 0 w ~G 0) 0 `d ro 0 W W 1,, �4 a) 4) (d 0, W W 'J l4 r-1 rd 04 o a) �4 � -H Hr1 rd � � •r1 a) rl rd 5 rl 5r- 1 �1 rd �4 � N rd W W U m 0 ,S," r' > 4 o\O (d (d J-) 1J �4 V > J-) a) 1J 1J a) a) [\7 0 S4 4J �4 4-1 0 0 U 0 ,S:i �i (d rd 4-) -r-I a) a) a) �4 W r-I W 014 4-) ° (d 0 a) 4 0 •r.1 �4 �4 a) o w a) 0 �i r-I 1Q, 4 0 M 0 ro 0 -r1 (d N U) 4-4 4-4 `d .0 U 3 04 04 ri a) a) W 75 W iJ U PI U 0 •r1 U r-I 1J U (d N Q+ H (d m � 'H o d aa) V rn ti ro aa)) U z H z N ra 0 vl a w g z C O �4 41 v m a 41 a) 0 W U ro v a a N � m w 'b o � o FA En 04 h w Q F Enw �D o E, H M H (J) In a4 U H U W L F1 L4 O U H •• Z H ro A \ h K4 x (q W H r W' 0 P4 H P4 l A,' P4 44 U) M 227 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope N N rA O �4 N 4-) N U1 r-I r-I N.-1 4-) rid t31 rt N 4-) 0 A O r-I 4-3 aJ �4 -H �4 4J k �4 �:5 O [u O � tn O 3 N rd N ro Q �4 44 .H ro O CS oo O O 440 -H �40 N r~ P'., U O N U O 1� U O q 0 �4 >~ m _ �4 C: 4-1 N �4 -rl O rIH -H JJ rd O A H Z U 4 UN 1) r-I -ri -H -ri O 4-) U d' ro � o A O En - wo v � U r �4-) ¢+ > R � (d i31 J-J Qa M -H '� Ul U J-) N (d N U 44 �' ?, U] O E 0 7 N N -H k W (D ?� N O b'r-I ro r 3 R, Q-, (d �4 Qa U m A -,1 N O N N N g N F rd N Ul U 3 U � m M 0 A N a N " Uri H w A r-I r-I (d U U b� i✓ O -� •� Qa E O 3 N A 4-I ri N 04 � � +UJ a) � (d � N � 0 NN O 3 Q 3 h M OU u] � (d U Qa • 1 _1 4-4(d r1 �+ N E 1~ > U ro w m U rd ro rd rd �- ��+ rd J O a rd I , a � � U � O r. +-1 >, 0 4-) rd 4-3 ?4 o4Hi U U V S N 4-3 (d rd dui � N E C4 N 3 •rl N >:31 r-I (d .,� (d ?4 00 H � 4-1 0) ri", ,� ,Si '(d ,4 ,'� O �-I ro ,t-I ?-I (d P; co U (d ?4 H a 1 U) rd 44 H U) Q U C7 � N N 04 d o U o 4-)� v H � � o rl � U (d i m w 0) O �4 � O r1 C1 � Ol r I 4J rd H �4 44 Cq W r~ }..i O 4-) N rl Qa fl O N 4-1 r~ N rd O O N Q O Q r( 4-) ? 0 ; Ul .11 �' Qa Is M 3 >~ r~ 0)u-I 4 � M o 5 U it rQ N ro >1 N M -r-I r I � ro �4 ri O 0 m 4J r I Q oo pw O Q( N 4-)O � r-i rI m S4 M N rl ri N N -H -H 0 � r 4-) ro U U aJ N N U) >,-rI rI rI O O 0 0 H (d �4 rO � 4J �4 M � O U 4J U OU N {~ a) ,O >, �4 ;� rI (d r1 JJ O M 4J -r-I r~ O (d -H �4 O S 1 : N N co H a Ei rd H m f� A (d U] U U] U Qa FC A M ram, (d z z 3 a-) U a U � a U O H H rd N 4J 0) U) W 9 FA rJ (d N U P: (EA U 'D m O H (A z M H M z P: O O z U1 H x � 04H x H Q H JJ U �S U t1 U Ul q N w r! v N W 7 O o w o H U .si r-1 U ro �-I P' H P4 1) N O N U H E H W 7 W F7 O E, H O H 1p 04 U H U W L` F Pi' O C� O W O U] O O O O O O z 2 H O O O O Ln O P: O rx H w a g es r�. (n M 228 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope a) 4J o 5., )4 4J r4 • 3 ,! r-1 (1) U) �J m rd a) rd A -,-1 co a) r-1 a) M O U (0 r 4 in (d O ,Q �I 4 a) �:5 Q 3 0 3 5 r� 1~ U O a) 44 ro 4J a) S U \ 0 5 O O ,—I M O O U U r4 �4 P4 A4 O rd r1 r-1 rJ u1 m O X ro -r1 � oo �4A 4-4 44 i✓ a) � 1J rd a) 44 U N m a) O H a) 44 O a) O U) )-I rd rd N rd ,� O �4 �.' rd O O 1-1 rd rl a) �4\ U rd 4-) O 1J G � -r1 rd U O d a) O o . 1 U 4-4 rd r, 75 k 01 � ~ d r, Q) U a) H 3 a) UQ (dk dO � ,—I a) V. U) O rd a) U O O >1 O U O rd O E �4 rd -� O N a) U rt � 4) 4 rd -rl U 4a C U a) U U)4 4-) E 4-, a) 4-) 3 4-33 1J as (00 H yJ -r-I rA ,� U] O -H a) �4 J-1 1J L: rA -r1 N bi'd O 1J U 75 U a) -H 3 U H a) rd �4 rd O a) 4-3 �44-) �4rd U o � bi s~ rd a) rd F4 U 1J rd a) a) N O U d 0 ro a) a) W ro �� rd 04 M 3 � � a) � O � y 0 a) ran O 41 a) W -r1 rd O d E r4 ro a) +J M rd d� P4 Q) -� r1 +J a) r4 m U U d Q) w 4-) a) rn A U ro U W rt �,�-, o �,�-, 1J r-I rUd a a) Z a) o 4-4 U0 0 � a) 11 4 ( A ro � a) q dP4 rI m a) a) 3 U M M � r4 a) 0) i31 a rd a)) O ro ro r--1 N rd -�rl .,�� r1 U m rc. 41 :1 44 P -r-I -,H•I a) (0 44 � -Q -ri 0) JroJ J�•J '� ��'' 3 a) � � o m O S a) 4 ro N --1 � O bl C tr O 3 �4 5 d a J F! - 0'-r1 a) Q) 3 d a) U a) U) ro a) d io w O ro r-1 rd m O 0i aJ a) O U N d a) d G O co p o aJ N N O ,�—I _� M A N 11 a) O 3 ro w H 1J \.� 4-) a) ,° M U rd O 4-) H a) (d O -1 \ H U uUi 3 . rd m 1 a) rd 75 ro a) 00 H0 41 N .,� rd a) M r-1 U >, (d to (0 r J 3 vi a) �., ''� .,1 �. •r4 4-) a) o U p, u3i 04 >� I N �� 0 -raj 4J w 4) U ro 3 .� U a) N WQ Q � � 4-I J-) l - :1 a H a))- � a a) m 0 A Q -r1 .,� �4 ro Q 3 rd U 11 -r1 .H s~ H � t4 .H O o d o ,� r4 rn r4 r4 a) r1 3 O 04 r1 -r1 ro �J 0) U a) rl 1J � P4rd rd r-1 O J-1 a) a) r-I �4 ,� U �i r-I �i r' ,-1 1J -H o a) 3 r4 �4 ro 1~ rd a) a) 3 �4 4-) r-1 r4 m O A U M a) M 4a a) 0" 0) aJ - )4 a) O O O ro �i �" r-I a) •rI � r-1 - 1 •rl r4 d •rl -r1 4 a) 4-4 i" a) r4 N a) U) � Z 4-3 44 r4 a rn S 44 Z U M F:4 3 w a P4 d a 41 rd a) H a U ro N Q, H (a ro � .H o d a) V rn H h c0 a) U a adi g z s4 r� 41 w v ai a 41 a a rd ro M -r-, U ri U ro o z a a H N rO 0 � � o h ra) Q E, a E, H H U? 0 U U W L H Ri O Z U O o U HH H •. 74 E H O N Ln rJ F. M v) W EH q CN P4 O P4 H y -- P4 ,-q Q' P4 w U) M 229 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope >4010 rn0) Q) mQ) .0 >4a) �:! a Q) wU) 0Q) Uzi >~ �4 -r-I -r-I U JJ Q) -I-) :� -r-I Q) �4 U (d 4-) O rd l-1 -I-) U) rd �5 fi 4J 1) Q) r-I U) (1) u-I -H �4 U 0 Q)ro � rn 0 0Q) N ' r-I ° U U .o r I � 4Q-)I 3 Ur � a) W U HO —1 �4 M u-I � -W U Q ) 0 U r1 0 O -) O U) UU 0 U `U 3 � i ,O U � rd � 0+Q U Q) H u4 is .0 O H U 3 O r--I a�i —1 � Ra .�1 9i A Q 3 .,� rI 0 4 � �r0 rUI �n 4 N Q ro U U H M O 3 O O Q) 4-4 S4 �4r0i .� N � � .H 5 04� O � 4-)m U U 4-4Q) td U 0 a) ,a p,-WO U U �� O 44 0 4-4U � r-I � N a) > � F O N U U) Q � � U U d 0 91 ; H U U O s~ 4-3 y t31 -H U ri .4 O Ga a.-i i (d O W m q U? Ei d w (d ¢4 Q) � 3 S O O ul +, � O � —1 H vi 3 C Ol >~ m rd U rd 0 � OU rf"4J rd N O '� w .. ��.','l) r-I a) U 'ri U U � -I 'd bi rd p 8 >~ ri x U Q) I~ s�.r 1 x w U a) O r-IN U U F' r I Sa E� 0 >4 O U �4 td 4J O 3 3 N a) •,� 0 Q) 4-) 0 4) rd Q) U 4) -, U 0 U r I a) N UI O � � � 0 � � F � Q) O O'1� :q U � A Ga Sri J-) 0 s~ U? a~ 04 m r I Oi U O A Q rd 0 U i; 0 w H 4 rd 4) N -H 0 � l4 U U U 0 _ ) 0 Q) O 4 a) O U H a) >~ rd a) H EQ Q x w O w w U U) �4 - r i N Q -r10 rdrd0H U00 " �+ rd 44 () r-I �' r, Q Qs� � 0 W -W �43 �, �4 �4 4-) -r a) I N —1 O I4 Q) -W w 04-� X U w U 0 u) pi 0 r-I a) U 0 I~ U)r-I M Q) �-I 4-) rd � Q -4 04 U �4Q) �A Q) +-) r i r-I UU r I CD W ri 0 r-I W U O 0 •r-I -r•I Q) Q) N I~ 4 I~ Q) O O Q) Q) rd -r1 Q) N N \ m H Hl U rd 0 O D U r 13 �4 -H U) rd Ei P U r-I Q4+� +� +� Q 3 E H • aJ � N Q1 r1 ro CO rd � U .r, 0 U) OHl r-I U co h rd N U Q) 4-)r1 Ol F E� S4 c] O $4 F N U] r 4) (L) PS -I rA-I O r U ri 61 N O N U O F] N L7 04 Q E U Q � E� H H � 0 U U W L` E� O W O u) � o O 44 U H E+ z E HLn O N o U Ua uE) Q ro a O CL H > \ w a F:� w r14 w r) 230 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope a) q 01 U a) rd 0) �4 a) F� U 10 I~ I~ -W A G' 0 J a) 4 a) a) �4 —1 �4 ro � a) ro r�-I U �� U) 'H 4-) U) $ Uz Y 1~ w � m A U >v > ro O Q fin J� U 3 '� U Q) .� ,� ° N ° 4-1 O 4-1 p o a) (d O S~ U U ro Can Q 0 ro a) r1 zn �4U U O ° H a) 0l 04 >~ G4 O a� O ¢ a) OU O Q m U rl U) a) H --1 4-) CA H >� rl ,� 0 N -H�" ro rd U U) 3 0 }I 3 N UO � ro .0 > ro a �rJ) � U � a) J-) 0 O 4-4 o rn r1 O >~ 1, 4 O p -W a) U K � U H ro U) O U i U ;J C/1 a) p 0 � r, N U 1� W rd N r-I SU1 �U1 U) N A A A 7J 41 a°i � +r U 0 3 w rd r O ,Q � E � U U ° m U > � U? m 41 m M p 4 0 � � W rd 0 U a) 75 0 . Z O O 4) U a) ro 0�4 4-) M .,I r � x -11 O O 01 ro WII J-) S4 a) W 43 m rI U > rdU ro o E-i r 'd o 'd ro •H U ,, ro U) a) rl -,� rd U a-J m A -H C � -rl O U H r1 t` �' a) rd ro O +.r U -H •H W N 04 4-4 d U U) ri J U I -H 0� o 75 H ro >� M a) r a..) ro oo rd O W a) O O U a)O 0) r-i rd • m N ° M6w °Q4 M W A ro a) 3 N 0 1~ H 71 Qrn rid U] a a) U W 4J H M A H w O a) t~ � 4J H Ul a) 4J •H W a) i4 $ N O I~ 01 J-) '� rd rd ° U) ro -H -1 4-1 ?✓ \ a) U rd .14 d O d r� C a) F4 W a) r.G a) +-) U w z ro rt a) ro N rd ° J 1 w U] H m 4 OH � .� J-) r-I a) '� 0l ro O G' •rl -r-I rl rl G' E 1 'd E 1 >+ � �., O \ F a) ro rd a) rd G 1) U M 4J �I M ro 'Cl rd \ ?4 U) d C7 -r1 >1 Ln m p, a) 'd F! '� O ro N U] rd '✓ s~ C U U rd U N H xi -rl -r-I •rl ,� ,S i ° —1 04 �I ° O rd -H 'd S~i � M x 4-) > E > d x d 4-3 + ro ;J a) •r-I •ri CO �4 H 4-3rl U) a) 1 o U O w �4O 0 U I~ rn U U 'd � � M a) Cn rd r U a) rd a) 0� U) 0 �4 Q a) �4 O ro O O 1~ 'd 'd O U 0 ro (d (a z4-J > a) U 0 U O 4-4 CN w 4-) 04 a-) 04 W M 4-3 ro a) �4 a O �:) z z X FC � rn E 1 r= ro O ro a) ro 4-) 0 lfl Q 0 (d H a) 4-I •H 44 rd O U) 01'd Ql 0) a) �4 4J �4 S-I rd W a) •r-I �'., '�7 (d -W a) U a) a) M UU O a) 1-) w rd >1 0 ;J I~ r-I i4 a) N U) • • • • U 'd M • • • • • • • • U) U) H -H Q,' 44 L7 U ro z a H ro � .H O U ') �i U) -M, d a) V rn �] r0 a) U W U a a a�i g z �4 >, rO 4 H z ro w -o U' u U ro �-4 a z as U) a w H U) H C7 W ro o � � o w W � h r� Q F 04 wQ E, H H U] 0 U U W t` • E� L4 O z U O o U Ei •• z H O N h FC M rUi) W HCN W' O P4 H -- P4 l Q' P4 w U) M 231 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope N E +u a) a) 1u E) O xJ a) 4 Ol M �4 O 'd (i a) a) �Q, U aJ 4J rd S., O I~ >i m a) 4-3 �4 U) 4-) a) w .! +-3 u-1 -H H 'd P4 O 3 O .� +�-) w a) H r4 �4 O � 4 0 O 4-4 Q4 0 U O (d E 44 rd � U S~ O U '� C (0 � (d 04 rd a) r X tl � rd m U 04 O 44 H O � �H rq O J1 �4 U) rd H� rl a) ;:J a) 0 rl M E E 4-) M ,) U) OU a4 'O O U a) N �4 A . s O vi w 4 d U •� X O p rd sI ri A O U N 0)H E O a)01 4J U rd O 4 3 > -H -rl a) Ua) 0 03) � rd a) O En 04 O A ,S� U +J Ol U -rl a) 0 � 4-) 4-) E r U � a) rd O d E •� rl A 1 pa) (d a� a) 4-1 4-) � r r-I P4 l 'O 0 �i 4-) W N C rd U U 0 ? o S w a) O E4 � -H 'd Ea -r I a) t~ N U 0) (d a) '� O ff" ,S', -r4 rd ' d �4 rd �+ .r-1 �4 4-4 a) JJ �1' •'i rd Ol r-I O U � � �1 � rd O � z a) '� U) (d G' a) "r1 yJ C a) �4 r-! a) �-I U U) OH F a) �-I U] O 4� �I 'Cl r-I r-I a) Ul 0 0 ?-I M a) \ F rt '0 � U (d O >1 0)r4 3 U � bl EQ n n U) (d 4 U) Q'' P, 44 O a) I~ �. U1 1J A (d O C U S~ rd N aJ O H O M 5r f, 4-4 a) 4J rd '� '� �" a) ¢' a) G O r- '� a) ?I P+ r) o W4 O ,� .� M-H •• a) > G' '� Ol a) -rl >1 rd Li 131 E a) 4-) ¢+ U ?4 N rP 4 S U) 4a a) (d S4 Q A..) N ,4 -H rd 'o O ri O O U) Q4 U rc$ a) 91 -H r-I 4-3 U M ,� U a) -r1 71 ?4 �4 � O 4--) U '� W 4-4 w � 4-1 a) m r� E vi - I a w m 0 Q) 0 P: E UM r h H 0 h � o .� 0 o Q a) 4J r� (D E 3 a) �4 �4 a) a) , M .. ro rcs rcs o 4 4 rd rl (d a) O M ;5 04 U) a) ro M (n a) 0 I~ (� P4 4J a) aJ 4J r4 4 4J 54 M 0) a) (d •ri � � r (d 3 U O �4 a) U) r-1 a) X a) -H � a4 a) l4 �40 O 9 a) O rl I O 51 O E O E s~ �+ 4 �4 co 3 Q4 W 4-4 E4 U) 4-i • • • W 4-4 4-) a) 4-3 "n 1H a) rd • • • • • FC CT U (d N 04 rd � r o rl a W rn 'd a) 4J rn 17 (d N U -H 1 F U 43 a 4) g z $4 rO 4--) H 4J U �S U a) w rl v Q) (d u] -0 Z U ,o ,(-I H F a) W n 0 � Z 0 00 Q) U ° U x h G4 0 x CQ F L7 EF H H � 9 U U W L` U H F -- Z E H N H W h9 x m w H P4 O IX x H �H \ w a F:� w rZA (n r) 232 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope I~ N a) a) a) a) E a) , a) O O O N (1) a) N E� r4 �4 rl �4 -14 N A N Pi H O 4-) I a) N E4 -H -H Q rd 0 -11 4J O 'o O u] O �4 44 44 �:S rl 5 a) 0 -r I -r-I rd Lr) N P b1 A 0 �4O ro N 0 r l �J M 44 rt ro rl d a) a) N ro r l ro I4 ro O 4-) 0 G' U a) J-1 ?-1 rl .11 U a) p � N a) 3 �l M O O a) ro rd rU-I U rd rd U N ro O a) O rl ro rd ri U O ' 5 Ea I N4J ri rd N O 4-) ro O a) a) -r-I �4 rl a) a) _O a M �rd S~ S~ ONi � Iaa) 4 q � 0bN 4-30 a) a) rd Pi 0) �JN 00t5 O � -W Q-•3 4, 4J 44 0 . a) U 0 U) 0 G v > ro O v o U �-H U) O N � U .4 rd 0 r-I O a) a) a) 5UU O A tr) O U 4-) ro 4-) 04-) 4J Q O a) H N O 4 O U) O N -H ui w is E�-' r 4J M rt a) 4-) a) H U r I ro O N M I � rt -H 4-) U M „ r-I 'd LOU) - r1) N a) '0 0) ro O M a) rl M >1 U1 N UO U) 0U1 E -0 Npa N ] 3 q p rd � Q) 4-3N � •� U a) ui �4io W U N rl rd O a) �I U w rl O -r1 ro z .� rd a) rd [�+-i ro ro U) r0-I 4-) � a) � r%I i N ,� 4J off U rroi N w A 44 ro ro �, a +� aJ U 0�4rd 0 0 A r1 5 ro r-i N ro 0 a) 0 04-1 IJ 4-) 0 > 0 ro ro rl �' rl N rl J-1 a) -r-I ro N �1 -- H � � 4-3 N� O d O Sa o 04 N O 41 0 _ (d w O ~ V o U a) 4-3 N4--) �4 0 O 4-) N I rO �4 ,O O O O 04 rd U �4 ,� 4J rn U) '5 1~ a) a) I~ W •rl a) ro a) � a) a) a) N -r•l S� a) O rd 44 lN0 Q N `� O U 41 rid 'H w •� JO-) J�-I rd N w � '� � N U ro a H 0 w ro w w •P'� H � U 44 U O .H s~ ;✓ P a) a) "I -r•I U -r1 U r) �., 'J rd -r•I rl a) 4) -r•I �-I -r•I 4-) �4 r' > U •rl M 4J O r rd -r-I �4 "90 a) rl a) 4-) ro •rq S-I rd 4-) N w O O a) 4J U r� V a~ rd w 0 1~ ;1 4 a) I~ r� 04 r1 U M 4 �4 �4 o a 97 m w W a) rA E U) Ca -H Ei 04 Ei rd —1 U) FG FC E S s>a a, • • z N rd U � ro 04 H ro ro � .H o U .r' 11 N m r-I U U) h rd a) U v tJl Ei E� S4 U) O Ix ad) �4 rO 4-3 v U) a 43 a) U -I-I r -O FL U) a �w w ro -rI z w w o v e H N F] Ga 0 rx 2 E, w o E, H H V) F U U w r Ei L4 O z U O N U 0 E+ •• z � zH � h F[; x U) W Ea P: O P: H 5-' P4 a FC P4 44 rn r 233 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope rl W W W (d td r1 O H 'o w GI4 CT4 0 Ul �r 0 '� � G4 DC4 Ga 4-4 H 04 a) -H 5. a) (D U U) U O �4 U -H Ul � -H a� �.1 O A r0I L�7 3 O U U Z > � o � r Ir U U W () `] > ',4 � 4J No � w � >a U O m P4 W 44 O O I~ ;:J . (d U �4 a) O W F34 + 'H PI F4 �4 }4 Ga U1 U N a EQ (d 44 a) (a a) W 4J N 41 ,�-I a) U1 I r, -H --) O 4 44 rO r-I rO �4 -H > -i �4 aJ �4 U U1 O (d r I 0 a) I~ � O � a) ro � 1J �4 r1 O ,] O O 3 P U p O w rO � a) +OJ m 44 S4 g O rd rl a) 44 4 a) 3 w � �i +� m m a) m a�i a1 C O rd (0 U1 (d � rd ij N � U1 -ri J-) O a) U U W a) U w }4 ¢+ U1 O 4-3 J-) Q) U Q) H a) W a) a) x a) a) -r I (d a) rd O O a) a) 14 a) 4-3 a) 4-) a) 8 U rd A a) d �4 > O O O r4 o S f1, rd 4-) 4-) r1 u1 �4 Q4 O O 3 ro O is rd Q r1 3 4-) O P4 p U1 W LIDrt r1 w z U1 • �4 -11 � I S a) o r1 a) `� O rd (0 E O r1 U O U) .r-I M a) �4 4-) W Q4 rd 3 HO a) r1 �4 r1 -'1 U o H (d (d W -rl U) ,� (d --) r1 �4 r1 }4 a) > (a a) o Qi >1 U m I (1) U rd (d O 01 O U F'., a) U1 Ul a) ,)-i r4 •H r4 ,S" U U) m O aJ U O Is r4 0 (d 04 a) U) O\ yJ ;J 1J 4-J 4-4 N W -r4 -r1 r4 (1) r; O .i1 .i1 O ;J '� 01 4J U) 1J U "n U U O �o Q 4-3 r4 O rO (d �-I 0 �4 F4 V r4 -rl U U a) U —I (d (d (d I I O w 0 r1 �4 -rl -rl 4-) 0 J-) (1) rd r4 r4 a) •r-I (d �4 �-I ?4 �4 Z o w w a) U 4J > r1 s4 rc$ U ;J �4 P4 A Q4 U W ;� 4--) >,-W 4--) O r z 4J -W0 o PI � o ?4 a) rO 0 ro � (d sQ (d + U 0 �4 0 0 �' U O a) (d O �4 PI O O (d r1 0 rd 0 (d �4 O O aJ N a) O ;J O O H a) co z Q U1 U Pa U 3 M W (d (d N q r4 U U) f14 U) U F-] U U E 1 U ro v? [a—H U7 rn H W H Q � r-l-I U O1 w w U h 4U) N fo' z PP4 H Ca 4 Ol F w H z C7 v 4J • a a z z z °z z H W S4 W O H W [� (d >. z a p w a (n w A Ix $$44 A J E, w FC a z H H a a Ix H r1 JJ U �S U Zi W PI rA F4 W W CJ a) w r J-) a) z a O H W r ( u -O W F H a� r-I '1 a W F >+ U (d U 10 �-4 a W U p a w l U EF >1 EF W a. .H >4 N Pr 04 F � Ul S U P.' H a ,? U) H H 2 H H W W Q V O 5 � O O x M x x >C Ei z x Pl U x N O a) U H a Or 0 z w P b H z H O H W O E-( h Ga 0 04 C) W U I H I> 10 w k w I U a 1 M 2 101 EF H H � 04 U U W L� F RS O W O COo o o o o o O (~ O Z 2 H o o o o N o o w o U U `� a uE) w w w w w W w w FxC ro 234 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope m Q) Q) Q) .H r-1 ro Ui r I r 1 r 14.) I~ 1~ (d 4-1 �4 r-I 4-) a 1a O O M (d (d l4 N P4 � � Old �+ rn 4� (d +� rd(0 QQ +fir a i Inn N 0 E o N U N r> 0 m U? U U � N W U r' 4-r 0 Fi w ro o N 3 0) 4) 3 G4 .r +� r 1 rd �' 41 W fQ (d M 4-I N U U) -� ,-� (d J-( O ,s M N UI �4 4J �4 m 4-3 0 N (d Q) Q 4-44 (d � N O N r-1 0 004 Z U 04 N E 'd Q) N N r1 A H N rd N (d 4 4-� Uri 0 �4 N (d 0 4-3 (0 44 rd � N � M rd �4 U) 0 (d 04 rt O � o O a" � � 1 r 0 'd N m O M 0 � rd M H M M � 41 M N N rd rd � ro (d O G4 rd rd rd O 0+� 5 � � N 0 ;-4 3 Pa O 0 N N S>a C N (d '� 11 w 0 0 4-4 N U O (0 rd 4a 3 � I~ 44 -r1 d N A U 0 f U z off Oi � � '� � m 0 -Ui O4+ M ,+4-r � P, r1 r, J-1 N N U) 4 W O U � � f. .� 4-4 M U .raj � 4-3 �'i ,� r> w JU-( W � W U -4 U d' N o U N E U �4 O OI:V 0) m 41 u) (� W N 4 J-) W �A (d H U] H ,i"i •rl N -rl (v) U 5 � (d Z M 7J N H N 1~ � N � m U ro 4-) 0 4 A O m 4 r-1 I~ 7J N (d o -r1 N U ro N N (n U N 721 FG U U M A u1 P: H H 3 rd M N z C1] a (d W F[ o H o HM Zi ',7 H H W O U 9 '� 4) V U) O w O Q �l x H O H r I U H U) H .q O W Ix H 7 Q F] (d N U z H z z H H X H O FC W G] U) 4J N P: O U O W H 7 W < 3 H 04 O W r1 t3 H H U F W z p H U) 17 PQ Q M a-) U a- U P: H U H yH 2 x F E-I z E H F a' � U) O p p rq p z g z P: H z P: H Q P: W P H H > O (-7 x H W rti H U G H a a pp E 2 U) H z 0 H O 0: w z S4 >4 ro 41 W �D U M H O x W O H z F Z 0 FC w r-1 4) U �I U z P: z U 0' U 9 U � H H W ,i: ,'5 ,7 U) U) C 41 N O H Q O FC F W FC w P: i-7 Q x O (d U) -n U U) W U 4a z W w U] Z C4 U 9 O H U) P: H 0 H O > O 0 z H W < W x 0 P: z 04 U (d U 'LS �-4 a s a a U H z O A PS w a w z F[; O � N C4 FC FC Q, FG H U H Q P( rx U Q H W Q H ,>4 U) H H C7 H H U ,R; Q Pi' �D Q P: ro -rl z U U W U U U W H a < l..l W W W W 11 W 9 W 0 ? FC O W W H W W W A > H N H PQ H H H H N H 0 N U H P( LL z P( P( P( W O .D FC �D H H � H H H U) U) H W Mimi U) x PQ w �l 0 Q r H H 0 H V) N 0 U o U W L � H O W O U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 w O H N M d rn O H N O r I N (n O zi, rn O N U H H H H O O O O O N O O H O O O r) O O N w H H H H H w N N C7 H H H O H H C7 h 9 x U) W E, 44 Cra 44 Cra 44 G. Ga C7 C7 C7 ri 0 C7 U N 1:4 P4 P( O FC P4 w U) M 235 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 4-3 E >i r--1 M a) �4 � O a) r1 '0 +� r1 10 �40 (0 (d 0 r-1 a) M 4-) Q4 r-I F! ti~ M 0 �-4 pOp,,w A N g. .H ran U 3 H O E Ea � � � 4' � � � ° ro ro Q) a �A >~ 0, r- o C �4U 044-4 (0 rd b .° U O rid r�I a�i `� M rd �4rd In U w a) -rq � U r 1 —1 � � � O J-1 X -ri rdN � °' � � � U) v -H (d a 44 � 4-) O u) q) •ri r1 � 4J O> 3 a) (d N r04 a) UU N N a) �4 U r� J 4) O m a' 4-) U U r1 C i✓ a) _ rd rd _ 1 r0 H N Q) H p, U a, 3 34-4 4J rdv tD U (3d � �� b{ NN �r I0 (d E 4-) b C U A 04 4-3 a) r I •r I 3 �+ (� Ol a) a) I O E rl N C1 10 S 0 O 0 Pad N N U U 3 O U rq U N 1J 4 O 44 5 a) U r6 a) U r, a) O +-) M �4 w o u) H -H a) M �4 w ro +-) H 41 a 04 4J .1i N O 04 �4 rd 44 >, a) �4 a) � J-) -r-I U � a) 4-) •H C.' f� rd ZO Q U c 0) 1 1 U ro -H 0) 3 .14 U 4) U U ((dd \ H a' 3 k 04 (d 'ri 0" 5+• I Q 0) O a) > 01 FA O H QI Ol a .,i � o 4J 4J rr-I (d 4) H rd o a U) � U) � rd I~ Pi � 0) .,1 I~ m x M 04 W ?a rd M U � U -w ::J ro O a) ;1 U 04 O -H a) W �J •ri J-I a) �4 � O U 04-� d' o r) O W -J 0 w M }-I O 4) -H ro O +u rd U r I M E 1J M O a) a) —1 O 4-) 4-4 (V W �i U U (d z ;J0 4J -W �-I 11 (d a) 0 a) t~ 04 91 J-) 4-3 a) 4-1 -W �I O Q •rl M a) S:! —I U) •H -H U) (d � U U) U] lJ •r•I �4 a) •rI a) a) 4J �4 M a) o itoM--ia) U? xo it 0 0( UloI~ I~ ro 4 li� �4 F� �-I �4 -4a) r-I �> rt a �4o U r-I U r1 U Ol r1 U ro a) U �+ a) U U U >~ a) n U 4J R,-H 91 r-I (d U 4-) �4 � 4J a) (d 4J U o V 4 4J I~ Z (d a) _ 9 N UU .,i Qa �4 >~ a) rd l-J I~ � �•r•I (d I r I S I a) �I 'rl U O a) M J-( -H O O �4 _ N a) co 0.1 (d PQ (d (I-a 3 U) a) W = -n H U) (d rA (d U �4 W O W U U L7 �0 3 I 0i U (d (N GL4 rd � U •ru U7 Owl 17 fd a) U -H M F U 4J a a�i g z $4 a) w r� v a) (d d rJ) -n Na) w KC �. rn 3 O N U ° O h Ga 0 04 CQ C~ fx o C� H Ln CJ) N 04 U o U W L` U H H •• z E H o N H N h U U m W F Ix O P4 x H > \ a, a r.� W FIA r) r) 236 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope N U Ol O O r� rd O A N 9i U r P a) U rn � -1 rd � E � o o A H U) 5N N E +� N O o U +-) U I~ 04 4)� � >4 �4 Q ro .H w ° a � v ro ran ;:$H -oi 0 H EH ¢+ $a, EQ 4-4 A rn 4-) �44J � H .H � 4J w 6 p N -o O 4J rd EQ n rd 0) Oi rt �4U -r U 3 0 a-' 3 -Ui 4)ia, � [a � Q) 4J (D � ro "emu �4 44 -Q -r-I �4 � U1 U 3 "- PU N R 4J U) O rd N C H 41 N co U) rd U P, -� '� �A 1 O O g M Q) d o r-I (0 s~ U = 4J +� q E HH rd N �4 -H = N 4-) O rd Ln r'a � U >4 0 FC r I �4 rd r I ro rd r - >~ r0 O U 4-4 ro m O 0 3 3: to H � 3 5� NO ro ( � � 4J 0 �3: " � IQ o N � w 0 4J CO rO O 1 = I � U1 U � - +J U U �4 rI w 0) U N rd P, [3 U = N - N N >~ N F� 4J N U :� >~ (N O co > 4-) O P; U r-1 ro 41 -� fo S~ W N O U O N r1 � m r-1 U d M fa H rH N N it rUd rd N DUI N rc; O W N ran Id ( 014 'H 4j 4-4 4OP rd I O H N N N W G' -rl 4-) 04 �1 4-3 4J O 'O 04 O 1:1 � rd O Ln rc$ 3 S~i 0 O P: �4 X k N N 0 W N rl I ?4 N �4 0 ro N Ln 4J N N(Y) U O O U U 4J > M U x ro w rd 0 Is (1) �4 H U 04-1 ¢+ ro 0) U) H H N -rl -H rd �4N N N U M � 4J N m �O �4 N ' U S 'H M w w 4-4 N W O O l-) 04 A, ?4 N tD 1-) �4 rP rd I~ �4 O I~ N 4-4 N N N 4 04 rd04 O ,� N 01 O lfl A N N N Ol J-1 N O P: �4 M ;� N S4 Ul QJ H U 4--) ,� W U U) ,s; Ca. O 0 0 �4 -4 -H 4-) �4 � P4 ;:15 0),A 3 -rl —IN r-1 �4aC U a-) �4ri 4-3 -H N w ro U N w w 0 N U m 0) w N r rd �4 C E O 4J > 5 r-I N 3 O N rP I~ 4-) ri U Na) 0 N N N rd U) I~ rd rd � � 0 U 1~ N �A rd r� U �4 rd M 4-) 3 —14-) rd �4 -W UU N N O 4-r 4-r ?4 �4 N O S-I rP -r1 U) -rl N ?4 5 a! O r� ;$ N —1 ,O rd FC N O rd N ;J >,•r-I N W U) U] UWWH01:4UHG4 W FG NAO WW a FC A Ul '0 U) 3 " Q n3 U) 4-444 � U ro N 04 H ro z ro .H o HH U F, .r, d N 4-3 W fA a) U1 J-) N N —1 M H a W �4 U) U H z C] � AI a�i g z > w a C/ ° � ° ° wW i a ai o z z a rd % U) " .a W O r I rI O H 'D U v w z H Q U w N ,b ro -� � z x w w zQ H w w Ul O NU HH FG W H z P H 9 FD G4 C7 114 2 H P, P, H U) 3 9 ,l O O O O O O O O H r1 E", H Ln Co M 00 Ln H r/] N N N N N 04 U O O O O O U W L H O W O En *1-- O O O O O O W .. 4 w H O O O O M O O H H N N N N N U M \ h FC xri) W H O 0 CN PO'. o PP4 H �', P, a FC P, 44 Cn M 237 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope U1 rd U) 4 �4 u-1 m U -• v U 1 U 44 - l..) >4 a) 1~ U a) a) 4-3 U O O U) -r-I a) Q rd OD O d4 L: N 1,, P 4•) A-3 -H '> -r 1 H 4) �4 1~ U 1~ 0 u-1 a) 4.) U .r4 M rd H rd u) ::1 a) O rd M O -r-I rd •rl a) rl (d S-'i r-I 1D O 1D N S-I rd 0 r1 H O �4 O Ci, 4-3 rd rl O ,� W r) U) r) 1 U rd ra r-I a) Pa n+� -� � U) >,rl H N .0 Ca Q O >1 r., "H U 44 Pa rd 4-) O a) rd � O t~ O u] > O i a) a) U Pa a rn 1 r 04 04 d rd rn p � tA O 0 O r � NO O 0)d N O 0 rU �rd 4-) -0 O Mpa U0 a) aqi O �� rn s� 04 a) � 0 U 3 Q a) 0 3 � 'w C � � N r� O -1 3 � 4 -1 N 1~ rl N rt N N a' 0 rt Pr ro n Pa O a) a) +) O o rl v rd 1~ 0 Q g �' rd td 0) 1 � a) Pa � M 3 r1 �+ A U O U S4 rt q) N O U N f~ � rd a) H Pa U O w 004 a) 4J 1~ > o 4a rd a rd 0 3 0 3-r f FC -4 w �+ u �+ rd O k rn 0 "� 04 (dN O a) U U O 0 V) N O W Pa N N 04 a) a) w rid A Pr ) m U) ?� � � M � P' C3) S~ O co rd a) `� O rd s~ a) � 4-3 ¢ � rt3 � EQaa) 4-4 0m � 4' roa) � � � U � 4J N 44 44 rd O a) F w 0) O CO EQ (0 O Ui 0 rd � a) U a) a � U1 a) o �+ o ro ro 3 OA Pra w -0 -� Qo o � o w ro bi d' r-I w rd U] >v-r-I � - N a) -H U •� �' �. 1 �i I r�l N O S U +- 44 r-1 rd C > U 0 a) rd rd ol d G' W r-1 4-' 4-a 'ri a) Id (d a ,7 J-) ' U ��rQ a) a) rd l0 - I r., ZO 4-4 44 -r-I Q) Q) U '�, -rl O �4 � U) a a) 11 O r, N r' �4 � 4-) � p 1~ P �4 4 U O rd r1 O H H 4-) U rI rd rd 1~ u) H -r-I a) r-I 3 a) �4 U r-I y) rl G' U >4 Pa a) O r 4) pE, G' W a) 4� ,� Pa Ul �, a) a) p J-1 ,� rd a) -r-I 0o H O -r-I U U s~ 04 m a) U u) +� r.,) U) -r I 0 .d � ?4 C1 _ ro r`-, Ix rA r0 -A H O ¢, 4J O a) a) I rd rl a) ra � N U) s~ U � o U � > � rd >,—I a) rl � 0 fx a) U ; rn Pa � • U A EO U a) r•.I rd a) r-I � m a) >1 >4 •ri rt Q 1~ n U) U 4-) O H O rd 1~ p qa N w a) A a) r-1 rd •r•I � 0 � rd ¢,,-r-1 U) rd a.-) � 0) 0 0 � � � o Q 4a U) U) a) rd 0 3 -H (d a) d U 91 4--) r, 0 O > Q) O rd M 0 1~ rl O r1 -H • 4 � �4 UI a) a-) r• � 0 V) U M W ~ co � r1 r-I O 4 Pr J-) E a) a) U) rI U }4 �4 4 4-) r rd � �4 r r) p U) rd � rd 5 � rd � 4 a) r 1 1~ m > U (L) �4 U) �4 -W o a) rd 4-) �4 �> Pa 4) U -r•1 4 91 >,I O M X rd -0 �4 O rd m GL 0 U) ;:1 rd ;J •4 r) -i S-1 N -r•1 �J rd (d a) 4 a) ca A Ul -ri x I U Pa U 3 U Pa a U) rd — H a rG U 0) U 44 q U r1 m Pa H 4 Fa � U � N a ro � U 'ri � U1 rn rd 4) 4-) rn 17 ro N U rs F U 43 a aroi g z w $4 tl rl 4.) U �s U a) W 114 l) N W ro - r-I-I U) -M > W U ro ,-I a' U) a) a FC � z o 4) O Q) U Ei F] G4 Ur 04 Ll E- ra U) �l C 0 M r) E, H Ln �o H U) N N 0 U CD O U W L` E� O W O ra 0 o O U H E+ Z E H 0 0 N h x COW F Cq n r r7 L7 o U U ri) N a O IX x H �H a a r.� w w r) r) 238 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope a) 1 O z 4 a) ro 0 (D rO U) 1J U) 2 `d W (d J-) U) O r I U) i r-I U) � '4 4 a) J-, -rl U) 04 a) ¢,lfl r-1 1. a) W S4 F l- a-) a) rO iJ -1 ro :V r-I ri -H � Ei f4 ;� -rl 4-1 -r-I G4 O M r-I ro a) C/) (d I~ O ro ',4 ro .11 30 p, � oaaa,2 0U � 9 -H ,� W � +J ,x row0 U) 4J W •r-1 �4 (V t~ a) O H O -rl (d a) W ro O W (d a) 44 a)N S +�� C a pa U o H h 3 bi b1 W W a1 W A W O rc$ ro .ri 0 U a) U) a) a) . C Ei W a) ro r1 (0 4-) U rd a) r I p -� 1UJ U A o U W '� U W pa a) ro U ¢, � r-i� . W I �rl >. U �4 W A-) 4 ro 047 � U �4r-' � � UU � w- 'OME-' oU�� rd $ ro W ro a) ? O WW °+-J W4 cd a a) N H x p 44 �a U - 0JJ 44 � F.� x � 04..) a) A -w a) Z44'a) O rd 44 rd N N 0 r4ril O U aG N O (d �4U 44 r-♦ F! � a) ;I � � O 0, 0, w d a)01 4J4 � 91 +J ;:1 ° (d ro U a 4J U N O -H H-1 0 � 3 LP N C O W 0 M rs, r4 0 � U to �4 WH N (d •H x FA 4-4 ° H O •rl W 4J a) Q-' U '� U O E Q) W U) r l r s~ ro o �4 ro ro o ° aWa) roo ° .H �, ° ro ° 0u� 4JU � E° ro 44 U N Hr > ' x o U 1 m O U M � 0H � ro Ua `-lp a) ,'� U)) IO 0 il 0 4J -H Ea 4J o (0 J aJ a �C O r I O r-I C�- U p 4 ° ° -1 '� r-I W 01 CL U ° Id rd J-) ate) J-3 OM W 4.) ° -�rl W (0 54 0 N ate) w H a) U 0 O -� U �+ .1 W W O M (d ' r I O A 3 Q) H a) O O \ 4J U ro a) ¢, � ro 44 -rl U O r1 -rl 4J r a) .. rd r1 Q �, Ei W Pa W �4 ,S..ir Fi C: W Z ro 4J U)•r-I ,t-I W W ,S' �i ,� >✓ o H W r I 1) A C rd Ei I:D a) O O a~ U r' 3 0 � s 1J rd ro O M x q w ro •H >~ 44 W -r♦ W W a) -r 0 -ri -r o U a) W a) U) -mil 0 a) a) 4J O W W r� 0) 91 O W 3 ro M 0 � U c�v W1 Ul 3 a, a rd Q O N ° Q U A � A ,-A 4-) 0 N 111•ri U U P% .1 U Q) � w 44 0 Q 0 14 O 0 W a) U) 4-) �4 a) U a) a) W >,, >,44 a) �4 ti O II a) H •r-I O ri U 4J ,-I S4 r-I �4 W I r-I r-I W ,S" r� -r-I 0) �4 r-1 M 4) w (d M P 4JJ U 4J U w 0)M a) U � N ao 4J -I R(0 Fi 4J N rrdd � rid4J 0 M P >r a) Pi O rd U Pi 4J 4J O 4 O 4 ti O a) a) O a~ r l (d O p —1 ro \ u) ro W 10 O U U rd (D W Ei u) W U W U W r.G U A W U W 44 U U W 4-4 p W U (d ro 124 H 0 ro � U •� � W m d a) V rn F] M a) U p En U 4J Ix aroi g z �4 rO 4J r� 41 U ;I U v W a 4J a) x � o U ro U rcl �-4 w a) 'b o F:� 0 h w 0 Q) Q F E� H H W � U U W L • Ei L4 O Z U •• o N 0 U E+ E H � rJ FC x W W EH L W' O W H P4 Il K4 N w U) M 239 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 4-) rd Q) r-1 a) 3 rd ----rO —1 rd N N 01 (V �4 Q) 3 4-3 N Q) Q) N o Q) P: Q) r-1 r-1 4 O I~ PO o Q) H 4 0 �:! �4 N 4 O I~ r--1 Q) A rtl E4 ',4 cd ttl + 4-) —A :Y 4-3 E4 r4 Q) A E4 4.3 1 4, O ;✓ Ul ,s; 41 t` .,� ,�: 'J 4J (0 44 'J (d 4-) U) O a) o u1 44 O U 3 N I~. � pOr 4 r rd 4 44 E U � OO� -4 OQ4 U2 04 r� O E a) a) x�, r O 0i � w ) ~) a) O , 4-i� a) A � O�4 rtOO r 4a +J U U O O �4 rd AJ rd (d O A l" x r1 O U p, V 4 N 3 O 4J U r4 x g rd Hrn aJ -H it aJ M O N rd U) U4J 4-) UWAO N --I U .H tt U 34 rd r rd rI ro U c$ ri O w rd Pa a) rJ 4-)O 004 a) BO O U E4 rd -H O o U 0" U A 3 04 x Q4 O 0p �4 1)co E H �r-I W �4 4J rUr��1 4J Pi +J O4 U Q4�o �4 �4 rmd a) � � � m FC a) U U S4 ,o a) A � 3 +J m (d a) 4l �4 P U) O 3 �A Q m 3 >,4 E 0 Q U -0 +O-) M �-1 O D U �4 P a) +J a) d a) U) ro 3 Ul —1 rd E4 O a) O rd w -�i -r�-I - 1-1 4-4 �4 rd-1 a) �4 �4 444 75 U 0l O 4 4-) E4 � � � Q) 3 � E Q 0 rd O 4-a � UJ -) 4.J U r 1 4 J A N 01•H E U m U N O Ul p r4 C rd rd u0i rd � 4.J a) fd 4-4 Q) •ri a) P4 Q) ,� -r-I H •� U O 0 jy r '� F['' 44 U 44 Q 'L'i 4-J ,Sy C'+ 4-) )4 —1rd N 44 E4 -'� O �, �4 a-1 N 4-4 F! N 0 �4 0 M W O M. [a Ea -W �4 O U EQ U m a) �4 � r� 4-) 04 Ga z U rd 'y A. 4-4 U a) Q rl U) N \ N U O O s~ ul E �,U a) .3 O rd 4- rd r,� U) o H Q r 1rd 4-3 rd p o 0 r 4-4 U U U) E4 rd O a, 4.J O 1J �i '� 4.J O N 0 Q) r-1 �q 44 U] UJ U '� ri `r, 0 ca �4 ( M 0 Uri) UJ N O Q P4 w (0 04 O 3 a) 'd Q) rd rd M �4 o a) a) C7 N W rd Ul '� �i ro C, (d 5 0 01 '� b" N rO 4-)-) O � rid M a) r-I �O w A a) (d a) �4 4-) 4-) a) ::l r4 rd U) 04 1J 10 ' 4-3 3 I~ U rd O 4 Q '4 4 a) rd M 4 �4 44 0 rl a) �-I (a UJ ,: � U —I (d �4 O a) U a U) A P; N 3 U) A 4 a�)I a) 1J Q) N -r I i -r-I 4-J r-1 1J a) rd � � L; N � �4 rd 4-a � W � U, x O U) � x 1J }y L; -W r' �, 3 rd r-1 rd U) 4.J UJ 0 -r1 41 O rd �4 4.J 'Ta 4.J �4 4-) 10 N �4 •r4 N Q) 4.J rd rd -r4 0 �4 -rI ,Sy r� (d Q) �4 10 4-3 4.J O � CO () (ll w co U -- Ul Q Q U a) Q rd 3 � H rd EQ m U) 3 S1 �+ 4-a P: rd w Ul a m z z U � N 04 ro � U 'U Ul OHl rd (1) 4J rn h rd N U a) ) as F W S4 W O H H g z H a ? �D H $4 rl 4.) U U �H 'D a) CA r~ 4-) N P r-I-I U] On C4 Q) w Q x w a) -ri X z 4) O N U �D H F] N L7 PG Q F G UJ E- H l0 H rA N 04 U o U W L� U H H •• z E H O d N 0 U U �' a uEi m N PS 0 1x H >1 w a F:� 04 rIA r) ri 240 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope S 44 m O '�4 ) 04 0 O U O rt rd ° 4-3 �4 o a� O x r= o rn -H rl N ro ri U a l� O U 0 3 N rd 44 H H O N H OZ H A H rd N o a H '� M w O rl U W N w O O w Q LO -rI w w A W '31 w W c an z u ro N LL H ro w ro � o m rn U W W d N rn E O U c0 N U a E U] W 6 F z R w z M H P4 w g z � CO P4 H z" o 7 U O H H U H rO4-3 H U �D Q 3 N v4Ji C N N w w 0 Oa z H v] -O w L7 H � a U � z O ro v w w H W H o w E, P4ro -� X z w x w z w A w w 0 O N U HH H HP W W O 0: W h rT4 0 rx 2 E U] a O 0.0 W 04 Q �D N E, H ut H V] l0 04 U H U W L F O W O rn � o O W Ei H W z W H O O wN O N OM N h K4 x U) W H Z C7 L7 N N N N N W' O P4 H D LL �l F 4 P4 44 U] M 241 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope W 'd 'd d a) a) rd • rl UA E-1 r1 (D a) rl r-1 a) 1~ M a) S~ U O S~ O >~ O -1 U) 0) 4-) 4, -H 0) s4 -H 5 U -H ;J �-4 • 4 4- rd 4 rn 0 (0 z •r4 rd (d s~ a) rd -r-I d a, -r-I 'd 4-) 'd H a ',4 0 �4 3 . a) M-0 'd (d 4-) a) 1~ rl a) a) H ° Q) " o ° o � � o� '-- Q) U rl U w �rd a o a) o } a 3 a) O cd s~ H 3 J 1 a �4 I) O rd 44 0 4,4 s d 04 3 % ,� �4 N N Ul Q4 � a) -1 O F" O 4 Q ° E-1-1 04 j 0 m Q) r s~ mw �4 �> -A -H 0 � � 4- d U c� W d r1 Q4 � 0) 5' p a) S~ �4 rd r) H O M 0 04 U •H 0 o A O 44 4-1 -H U) 4-1 •• U] O � U) 4J -rn 4-) m g! •'� rl r-I 4- 4 � o a) r1 A a) Z Q) -0 M r 4-4 4, a) �4M EQ M a) 5 'd N ;:; O a, p p •� m o rd U U a) a) 04-r•1 � m ro �+ + M x M 1~ 1~ O �4 bi 75 � U N M °) b� > rn a U1 d H Ul 0 Cn -> 04 04 H 5 p, ° w �4 a) rd 0 m � � .� � 04 rd E � m (a �4 rt a4�) H1° �, �+ � � � � � � � Qa � M UU11 ID,0 � r1 0 to a N 4J � +d-) a) P4 � � ui 04 4 4 � roH � '� o m a �' � w4- oo0 a) �' 4-3 o `� � U a�i � of fd rd S'-+ U .� H L', O rd U -H 4� U p r-I �I -� ,H > •rl r H U sa O U) .0 � � 0 cd � M U H •r•I '� d -r, � .,I 1d (0 44 Im rx k rd � 3 1d -) a) O O U U 04 O Ei a) W O 'd O R M U U U) O .. r U rUI W rd a) I I u�) 0) N r I a) U I O d ri 1n rd r. 4-3td 4-) rd rd �n w as 01� 4-) o 0 a) 4) � U N a) rn � rq rq z rA r l r 1 a 1 -r•1 rd rCJ �4 d rd W w of H q 0) D a) aJ ° 0 'd a) rd rd a) O a) J-) 0' a) II a) S~ a) V rl ° a) > P' a) n) C! 0 Ul 1 W 4J H fx w -� A rt O 'd r1 (d �4 Id vi O' o a rl b' 0 a rn 3 a) 1 — d q 04 a) rd M \ ro . y 0 o H � � w U 1~ 01 P o U a) �I • M �4 �4 � 0) H a r p$ M rd U 'D (d S, ri (d 0 a) 4--) O )-I M rl -4 a) 4-) a) rd (d a) ?A 4J 4a o U r> 0 rl Ol w U (d 4-) —1 V O M ;I 1~ U M 3 M 43 rl rl a) 4-) v a) -H a) G4 cn H 4 O W -H U M 'd r4 4 r1 0 ;1 X 0 0 0 rl O 0 ,O 0 1~ 4-) 3 • 4.) 4-4 ry w (d a U) U a —14-) 1 1d 14 a (d U) U) W (d 04 U U) U) 4--) a)-H rd 01 (d a) 0 Q 0 ro 0 �4 A q r. a r O O •• H (d a) M �I U) —I M -r-I04 N rd W •ri W ;J 4 P4a) —A 4-) a) 4-4 � U 0 4-) F-I U) U P4 C'. 4..) r~ Id 4-) O 4-) O H 04 O t~ a) O 0 11 -H O r1 �4 U cn O • • z � :E: U M • • 44-4U 1404 U] U (N a W z •H o 4 U 'd N 4-) rn z z f7 fd N U z aN ° COO U z 0 sa z H H H 114 r-I 4.) U `� U x x H O a) m s~ 4-) (L) rn rn p o 0 14 N (1) 04 H H m >. u) w x rx Q cn a) O a) U H Ei z x H U �] N L7 PG Q E� z H W [U rJ �l W O O Q p1 Ln r E- H a N N H 04 U '� o H w O • Ei a o U H P .. z E H U O z N H \ Ei O U U < a r) U) N rx O P4 x H ya H \ P4 a K� w r� rn a r) 242 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope r4 S. U) a) )-I �+ 171 rl U) �4 �! iJl � O a) 0 rl a) a) 0 r rl a) >~ (D -H U) 44 -H (0 -r-I .H �' •r-1 �J a) l.) W -H a, O 44 O d rd b 04 -ri (� ' � O,y 4-) M O 0 _ � \ N J-( o 4- N O 4-3 ( O H a U m4-) a) 04 U) v , 8 U 0�44 (d cd M �( U) � U r-1 W U (d 4-10 E �4 (d 0 �4 �l q a) 0 �4p; ni U) m a) 71 a) rl O bl -w 4-1 a) U) cd N O N O -A 0 44 U +� .A � +3 i 0 +- H U) 5 N \ r 1 4J In s~ O a) -� A CO 4-3 - 1-1 s~ a rd A H T) HQ U W � r0+ O w H O O 04 � � � � � N n a) E W 0 a) w 44 a) .. x Wr-I .. .. O •• U1 bl c+1 O t` a 44 U t` aD �4 O ns W � X r I G �o A P14 3 a) a) 4 aJ +.3 a) a) U 4 s~ a.) �4 4.)0 G' 4 4.) Htp HM 4 - a) 4.) 4.) �41 0 (a j✓ 4.) (d m a 4.) ro ro U2 a! 0 w rn 3 a4 M 4a VI 44\0 zF 41 tr a)4r• a) N� OO N 14-) 4-)O ° a) � U N Na0 N N 0 44 m N a a (aH ro w � (da � 4-) a a In P4 aU] M ni o U o O '� o v a a) 0 a) a) � � a) a) 0 a) s~ a) 0 a) 44 a) a) a) U) Ol U) N U -4 4.) J.) \ 4.) 4.) � )4 V J-) -H 4-) U) -H J-) -H J.) S! 4-) a) 4-) 4-) 4-4 U (y W 0 0 ro 44 0 � 0 l� ro Id (d 4-) (d(d � (d (d J-) (d0 (dro (d (dr4 0 lfl Q M L: 0 a w A W q N >1 A V, (d 91 r4 r4 V. U 0 U 0 0 0 a) )i O W LJ r•-I I.1 $d —1 i•1 a) I.1 � 4-( W S-1 Ol )4 (d w a) M V W U $4 $4 J-) M P4 J-( 0 a) a) a) r1 a) � a) �4 a) a) -H a) _0 (6 a) rl a) �4 4) a) a) �, 4-) 0 M 0 F- JJ a) 4-) \�- a! 01 4-) � J-) 4-) � 4-) r 1 4.) r a) � a! � 4-) 4-) � U w �.' (d rl (d H -H r-I 91 r-I a) r-I 44 0 r-I r-I ?A rl 0 91 r-I 0 r-I 0 r1 4 r-I r-I 0 a) w W W M W 44 M A,' rl A' •H µ' �4 0 0 4 � -i � � •H µ U U U � � (d H 04H w W .H � 9 U m (n U a a rd a) V rn w H O O F F CO h (d (1) U (n F F 9 9 O x U) J-) a) P4 H U] 9 U) F(; H M N -H M F z W a F F (n z z F H U a) 44 KG U W O W W H Ix �4 U) O P4 P 2 04 F F F a [a FC z Pd coH EF m r.U) � r.4 a)4 , rd -w o U Fli U) H H H O'a U ,-� r1 4.) U �I U a U Q P4 [, 44 �4 rd a) U1 04-) (1) 44 H Z 2: F 44 H H CO P 3 r-I r-IO 011 PPQ U °a o � F a 04 U ro �-4 o p 0 9 Pd w w o FC o v a, H P4 Z F U U U H H N ,d 0 -� � z w H H H w w A w z w O � r.� O F ,-a H H p; W W W F H F ha) O a) U H z Il 9 O W P4 W W G4 C� P Q F H FC 3 F L7 a a W P H �l 0 u) Ln �D kD H H F H H N Un H V) O d I- P4 U H o U F o W o (n O 0 0 0 N 0 0 N U H F �Ty H O O 0 0 '4 0 \ v h F[; pC U) W F U U Ca W Q N rP4 P4x� N P4 q FC W 44 W U M 243 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 244 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 7.12 Summary of Finishes and Systems PAGE 247 245 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 246 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope d c r 5 = r E a m .E E 2 >fa E 2 E Y3 o ti5 E o > E-Q Oi12, Gi E, C > > E = L m t t zl coi3 oin 33 a' 3 my N inoYr � Y ''> c� � xa in w` rc5x Q o o a o _ mU a � � � � oU � � aaU � aU � U � UUo � aa 8amUUW U •min � � aa ma a aU U rnm � Na Ua � m a � _ o y U o U > N U � Q _ E ¢ w O � Z .O d �'? LL') O M -- O O Q N M -- 2 O 2 2 a O M N t0+� O LL'J ? q . 2q In U H 2 Z U N O M Z A N C LL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ZE O C. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + y + # y N N N A ti N F ics~ ~ r ti A ti LLJ N N ti n A ti ti j: ti n LL-"i n E v v v v v v Q- - - - - v v v v v v v v v v v v v 12 v v 5-5 12 v v v v > v v 12 70 12 $ O' LL F N 2I> U N C N N N N N j cj a a a rn a m a m a � LL LL LL O H 0 O V ? C Uj •- U 0 `N m LL 'J c N N m 7. C � F m U = m Z m LL U H a m a arcsm `n > 33 rn Z Z Z Z Z Z Z D Z Z Q ¢ U > zv c� U c� a zwU c� ac� a U U Uac� a zzo o � o 'd ¢ m ro a a r, m Q > > a3 > m c� c� m c� N f 02 w m m m m m m m m m m m x m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a m a x 3 of m3�: of x 3 3 of x w xR�: x x x x of xR: x x x x In of m x o C Q U U N S_ S d H d w d a s a a a a LL LL x LL a a a a LL a a a a a LL (,j t� LL H U �c~i g a x 3 w LL LL U m U U U U o U o U U U x x w x U U U U x U U U U U x U U m x U m J¢ U U U w C7 s � a r z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a z z a a a Z a a a a a a a a a s - a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a M a is > > —m a a > � � c37 > c37 > > > c37c37 � o (D > (D0ac00 c37 (D > c370c3D0 > c(DU0L � U 0 E � d o — d m E m a x ¢yd m o �c 2 E EE =f 'o E 0 m 132E OU UaOU ¢ po U m 00 1 ¢ ¢ U CO m Mm oa E xmUU mHiwi 3 ¢ ¢ N - 247 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 7 Consensus Alternative/Proposed Project Scope 248 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts lam 8.1 Introduction Several schemes for the proposed new Trial Court Building were studied at the conceptual level on two site configurations,both in response to requests from local groups and with respect to the challenges of site acquisition. Drawings of Plans A,B and C and Schemes Al, A2 and A3 are shown in the following Sections 8.2-8.7,and additional studies are described in Section 8.8.Careful consideration in all schemes was given to the question of scale and streetscape presence. At issue was the ability to create a building that would meet the needs of the Trial Court on a tightly constrained site.Goody Clancy explored alternatives in which the First Baptist Church was incorporated as part of the project,as well as options that left the church in place. Also in the mix was an alternative which maintained the three houses at 58,60 and 62 Federal Street,as requested by preservationists concerned with keeping the connection to both a vanished neighborhood and to the adjacent residential areas. The larger site includes the First Baptist Church and is approximately 82,531 square feet (SF).This site is bounded by the Probate and Family Court on the east side,Federal Street on the south side,North Street on the west side and Bridge Street on the north side. In this site configuration,the ramp interchange is demolished(with the displaced traffic to be accommodated via the ramp on the other side of North Street)and the land transferred by the city to DCAM.The three residences(58,60 and 62 Federal Street)are considered to be removed from the site.This site is large enough to develop a footprint that allowing a relatively low height of the proposed Trial Court Building.The site,with its adjacency to the Probate and Family Court,allows for direct connections of utilities,staff and detainees between the new Trial Court building and the existing Probate and Family Court, The smaller site does not incorporate the church property and is approximately 54,951 SF.It is bounded by the First Baptist Church property line on the east side,Federal Street on the south side,North Street on the west side and Bridge Street on the north side.This 249 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts smaller site provides a smaller footprint for the proposed Trial Court facility,resulting in a taller building with more levels constructed below grade.Left in place,The First Baptist Church property blocks connections to the Probate and Family Court. 8.2 Plan A (formerly referred to as Scheme B) Plan A assumes the rear addition to the church is to be demolished and the sanctuary relocated to a preferred location at the corner of Federal Street and North Street.This scheme of approximately 190,000 GSF places the mass of the new building along Bridge Street with a pavillion wing that extends to Federal Street.It has two levels below Federal Street and five levels above Federal Street.The public entry is on Federal Street adjacent to the public entry to the Probate and Family Court.As with schemes Al and A2,staff,service and detainees enter off Bridge Street.A tunnel connection to the Probate and Family Court for utilities and detainees is possible as well as a potential pedestrian bridge for staff. PROS A The mass and highest portion of the building fronts along Bridge Street with an appropriately scaled lower entry pavilion fronting on Federal Street.The entry pavilion is adjacent to and matches the height of the Probate and Family Court entrance. B Relocated to a prominent position on the corner of Federal Street and North Street, the church will replace the three houses with an appropriately scaled structure visible when viewed from either end of Federal Street.The location of the church continues a pattern of churches located on corners in historic Salem. This scheme is the precursor to Plan A/B,the preferred scheme. CONS A Service dock access is right. B Complex ramp construction is required to provide parking below grade. FIGURE 8A Plar A ��l 7� ��11 rt• M Y n+' A r.y 250 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts i ■ Third Floor First Floor Second Floor r - Level B1 Level B2 Plan A ° — h 251 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 8.3 Plan B Plan B locates the proposed Trial Court building on a smaller site that excludes the First Baptist Church.In this alternative,the Trial Court building would have a reduced footprint (about 33,000 GSF)but as a consequence,would result in a taller structure with three levels below Federal Street and six levels above Federal Street to accommodate approximately 190,000 GSF. PROS A Preserves the First Baptist Church property intact. CONS A A more massive structure located too close to the small First Baptist Church. B The cost associated with building a taller structure with an additional level below grade. C The cost associated with ramping down within the structure for staff parking,service vehicles and access to the sally port. D Inability to connect a service tunnel to the Probate and Family Court building,for staff and detainee secure circulation and for sharing utilities. FIGURE 8B Plan B ..r-� j r 252 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts o � Level 3 Level 3M IL Level 2 Level 2M my I e o o c o a e Level B1 Level 1 Level 1M Plan B " 14 20 50 n 253 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 8.4 Plan C Plan C is similar to Plan A,but maintains the three residential structures 58,60&62 Federal Street in place.The First Baptist Church is moved but must be set back from the corner of Federal Street and North Street due to lack of space on the corner. PROS See Plan A above. CONS Same as above with the following additions: A The three residential structures prevent the church from being in the preferred location of the corner. B The three residential structures crowd the entrance pavilion to the Trial Court building. C The scale of the three residential structures is not appropriate with the scale of the Trial Court.Both the residential structures and the Trial Court are demeaned by this juxtaposition. 1 eRl1]CE ST1t�ET I Q Y a I+� F€DERAI.5TREET " l f i L HOUSf5 PROPOSEt7 TRIAL EXISTING PRO BAT E& I} COURT 9UtLDING FAMILY COURT BUILDING �u 254 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 8.5 Scheme Al Scheme Al incorporates the First Baptist Church in its present location but removes the rear addition.This scheme,of approximately 190,000 GSF,wraps around the church with an L shaped plan.It has two levels below Federal Street and five levels above Federal Street.The public entry is on Federal Street at the corner of Federal and North Streets. Staff,service and detainees enter off Bridge Street.A tunnel connection to the Probate and Family Court for utilities and detainee transfer is possible.The potential also exists for a pedestrian bridge connection to the Probate and Family Court. PROS Preserves the historical position of the church on its property with its front courtyard opening to Federal Street. Saves the cost of moving the church. Direct connections for utilities,staff and detainees between the Trial Court building and the Probate and Family Court are possible. CONS Due to lack of space between the church and Bridge Street,more mass of the Trial Court building is moved to Federal Street. The church is mostly hidden from view due to the mass of the Trial Court building on North Street and Federal Street. The L shaped plan results in excessive staff and public circulation. There is no modulation in scale at the corner of Federal and North Streets. FIGURE aC Scheme Al *7 @q-tlli�-L 6 Aril 255 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts c ® p0a❑ap LEVEL2M LEVEL3 m. a • �y..i: :: Ppa 1 1 -EVEL l — _-- L�V€ 2~� LE — 1 —� r L r N 0 50 100' Scheme Al 256 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 8.6 Scheme A2 Scheme A2 incorporates the church as part of the court project,but moves it forward towards Federal Street.This scheme of approximately 190,000 GSF has a U-shaped plan, connecting to the church at the new building's southeast corner.The public entry is on Federal Street at the corner of Federal and North Streets.Like scheme Al,staff,service and detainees enter off Bridge Street.A tunnel connection to the Probate and Family Court for utilities and detainees is possible as well as a pedestrian bridge for staff. PROS Moving the church forward allows the Trial Court building's floor plate to be larger.A larger floor plate allows the Juvenile Court to be moved from the lower level to the Federal Street level. Direct connections for utilities,staff and detainees between the proposed Trial Court building and the Probate and Family Court are possible. CONS The U shaped plan configuration results in circuitous staff and public circulation that will be difficult to monitor,potentially a security issue. If the church is to be moved,the preferred location is the corner of Federal Street and North Street where it continues a pattern of churches located on corners in historic Salem and can be seen looking down Federal Street from each direction. FIGURE 8D Scheme A2 � `A' e 257 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts S � ` Y LEVEL 3 LE 2 GROUND LEVEL r O i LEVEL B1 VFa W—`-r N 0 50 100' Scheme A2 258 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 8.7 Scheme A3 In Scheme A3,the addition at the rear of the church is demolished,and the church is moved to the corner of Federal Street and North Street.The main portion of the proposed Trial Court building is oriented north-south fronting on Federal Street and Bridge Street.A Juvenile Court wing extends to the west behind the Church. PROS A The church is located on the corner of Federal Street and North Street continuing a pattern of churches located on street corners along Federal Street.The Church in this location relates to the scale of residences across Federal Street and down Federal Street on the other side of North Street to the west.Because of its prominent position and the fact that Federal Street bends at this intersection,the Church will be seen looking down Federal Street from the west. B The entrance to the proposed Trial Court building is adjacent to the Probate and Family Court building and will share the same drop-off and handicap access. Juvenile Court is in a separate wing. CONS A The courtroom block is oriented north-south on the site putting too much mass fronting directly on Federal Street. B The layout of the detainee level,on grade with Bridge Street,requires an underground tunnel connecting detainee elevators in the courtroom block due to a plan conflict with the loading dock/storage/workshop area. FIGURE SE Scheme A3 plan _ ,,. , S DGg'STREET qv J4. r �.4 d°d p r � 1 d Or gEPlti. L f 7 / 259 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 8 Summary of Alternative Design Concepts 8.8 Additional Studies The following additional studies were undertaken,at the request of interested neighborhood and preservationist groups in Salem,to determine the feasibility of constructing a new Trial Court building on the site with a slip ramp connecting North Street to Bridge Street,and on the site with the three residential structures retained in place and relocated on the site: • With slip ramp,church property untouched,houses untouched. • With slip ramp,church moved(with addition removed),houses relocated(fronting on the slip ramp). • No slip ramp,church property untouched,houses removed. • With slip ramp,church moved(with addition removed),houses removed. • No slip ramp,church moved(with addition removed),houses removed. All the studies were compared as to their impact on civic goals and court goals.See Goody Clancy's report in Appendix 1.1 entitled Salem Site Evaluation Study, Site Options for the New Trial Courts Building,draft June 29,2006.The conclusions drawn from the study show that a new Trial Court building on a larger site,unencumbered by a slip ramp or houses and with the church moved,ranked the highest in achieving both the civic goals and the court goals. 260 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs I 9.1 Total Project Costs PAGE 263-290 261 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs 262 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs FAITHFUL L 1GOULD J. Michael Ruane Judicial Center Federal Street, Salem, MA Goody Clancy Architects Study Cost Estimate March 22,2007 L11 Faithful+Gould 55 Summer Street,3rd Floor,Boston,MA 02110 phone:617.423.5548 fax:617.423.5578 263 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs FAITHFUL_ IGOLJLO 55 SUMMER STREET THIRD FLOOR BOSTON MA 02110 PH 617.423.5548 FX 617.423.5578 March 22,2007 Mr.Paul Dudec Goody Clancy 420 Boylston Street Boston,Ma 02116 Dear Paul: Re: J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center Please find enclosed our Construction Cost Estimate for the above referenced project based on schematic design information. Construction Start Gross Floor Area $/sf Estimated Cost Trial Court Building Jul-08 190,071 $429.38 $81,613,401 ESTIMATED CONTRACT AWARD 190,071 $429.38 $81,613,401 This estimate includes all direct construction costs,construction manager's overhead and profit and design contingency.Cost escalation assumes start dates indicated above. Excluded from the estimate are:construction contingency(for change orders),hazardous waste removal,loose furnishings and equipment(except where stated),architect's and engineer's fees,moving,administrative and financing costs Bidding conditions are expected to reflect a CM at risk with competitive open bidding for sub-contractors,open specifications for materials and manufacturers. The estimate is based on prevailing union wage rates for construction in this market and represents a reasonable opinion of cost. It is not a prediction of the successful bid from a contractor as bids will vary due to fluctuating market conditions,errors and omissions,proprietary specifications,lack or surplus of bidders,perception of risk,etc.Consequently the estimate is expected to fall within the range of bids from a number of competitive contractors or subcontractors,however we do not warrant that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the final construction cost estimate. If you have any questions or require further analysis please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Faithful+Gould Neal Fontana Associate UNITED STATES UNITED KINGDOM CONTINENTAL EUROPE ASIA INFO@FGOULD.COM FGOULD.COM Faithful+Gould is a part of the ATKINS Group 264 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate INTRODUCTION This Construction Cost Estimate was produced from drawings,specifications and other documentation prepared by Goody Clancy and their design team dated February 16,2007.Design and engineering changes occurring subsequent to the issue of these documents have not been incorporated into this estimate. This estimate is based upon the measurement of quantities where possible.For the remainder,parametric measurements were used in conjunction with references from similar projects recently estimated by Faithful+Gould. PROJECT OUTLINE This project comprises the construction of a new courthouse of approximately 190,000 sf together with associated site work. Key program elements include arraignment courtrooms,district courtrooms and superior courtrooms together with all supporting,jury rooms,magistrate areas and support facilities.Law library,district attorney,district court probation and clerk magistrate,superior court probation and clerk magistrate,secure parking area and detainee areas. Site work includes roadways,walkways and all associated soft and hard landscaping BASIS FOR PRICING This estimate reflects the fair construction value for the construction of this project and should not be construed as a prediction of low bid.Prices are based on probable local prevailing union wage construction costs at the time the estimate was prepared,however an escalation line item is included to project the current costs to the projected mid-point of construction approximately 26 months from the date of this report.Pricing assumes a procurement process with competitive bidding for every portion of the construction work, which is to mean a minimum of 4 bids including for all subcontractors and materials/equipment suppliers,and assuming Chapter 147 applies. If fewer bids are solicited or received,prices can be expected to be higher.Please note that this estimate assumed a CM at risk procurement. Subcontractor's markups have been included in each line item unit price. Markups cover the cost of bond,field overhead,home office overhead and subcontractor's profit. Subcontractor's markups typically range from 5%to 15%of the unit price depending on market conditions. Construction Manager's general conditions'cost is calculated on a percentage basis.Construction Manager's overhead and fees is based on a percentage of the total direct(trade)costs plus general conditions,and covers the contractor's bond,insurance,site office overheads,building permit applications,and profit. Unless identified otherwise,the cost of such items as shift premiums,and allowances for temporary occupancy permits,police details or street/sidewalk permits are excluded. We have included a Design Contingency/Design Reserve percentage to cover cost increases that will occur during design elaboration or unforeseen design issues.As the design develops,the design contingency is reduced,and is eliminated at the final Construction Document estimate. Construction/change order contingencies are not included in this estimate and are assumed to be carried by the owner. Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 1 Faithful+Gould 265 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED IN THIS ESTIMATE Items not included in this estimate are: Land acquisition,feasibility,and financing costs All professional fees and insurance Site or existing conditions surveys investigations costs,including to determine subsoil conditions Structural fill due to poor soil conditions Items identified in the design as Not In Contract(NIC) Owner supplied and/or installed items(e.g..draperies,furniture and equipment) Tel/data,security and AV networks,equipment or software(unless identified otherwise) Rock excavation;special foundations(unless indicated by design engineers) Hazardous materials investigations and abatement Utility company back charges,including work required off-site Work to City streets and sidewalks,(except as noted in this estimate) Construction or occupancy phasing or off hours'work,(except as noted in this estimate) Compact&library shelving Owners Construction Contingency for scope changes ITEMS THAT MAY AFFECT THIS ESTIMATE Such items include,but are not limited to the following: Modifications to the scope of work subsequent to the preparation of this estimate Unforeseen subsurface conditions Special requirements for site access,off-hour work or phasing activities Restrictive technical specifications,excessive contract or non-competitive bid conditions Sole source specifications for materials or products Bid approvals delayed beyond the anticipated project schedule ALLOWANCES(per owner) General Conditions contingency of 10.5%to include Insurance,Bond&Permit Estimating&Design contingency @ 10%each CM/GMP markup of 3% $1,500,000 for moving of existing church building STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST OF CONSTRUCTION Faithful+Gould requests that the Owner and Architect carefully review this estimate,including all line item descriptions,unit prices, clarifications,exclusions,inclusions and assumptions,contingencies,escalation,and markups to ensure that requirements have been correctly identified.If this estimate does not correspond to the Owner's budgetary objectives,Faithful+Gould strongly suggests that evaluations of other design alternatives/project procurement options should be made before proceeding further. Faithful+Gould has prepared this estimate in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices to reflect the fair market value of the project.This estimate is made on the basis of the experience,qualifications,and the best judgment of professional consultants who are familiar with the construction industry. However,Faithful+Gould has no control over the method of determining prices adopted by any individual general contractor, subcontractor or supplier.Faithful+Gould cannot control the cost of labor and materials,the bidding environment or other market conditions,and it is not possible to provide any guarantee that proposals,bids,or actual construction costs will not deviate from this or subsequent cost estimates. Any requests for modifications to this document must be made to Faithful+Gould within ten(10)days of receipt.Otherwise,it will be understood that the contents are fully concurred with and accepted.Notifications of any apparent errors or omissions should be made to Faithful+Gould as soon as they are discovered. Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 2 Faithful+Gould 266 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J. Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22, 2007 Federal Street, Salem, MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY BUILDING SYSTEM TOTAL A10 FOUNDATIONS $2,894,720 A20 BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION $1,739,995 B10 SUPERSTRUCTURE $5,706,669 B20 EXTERIOR CLOSURE $7,775,962 B30 ROOFING $714,465 C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $8,641,399 C20 STAIRCASES $740,810 C30 INTERIOR FINISHES $5,998,880 D10 CONVEYING SYSTEMS $1,728,250 D20 PLUMBING $1,196,750 D30 HVAC $6,449,964 D40 FIRE PROTECTION $1,012,917 D50 ELECTRICAL $5,952,101 E10 EQUIPMENT $529,000 E20 FURNISHINGS $65,000 F10 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $0 F20 SELECTIVE DEMOLITION & CHURCH MOVE $1,557,000 G SITE PREP/DEVELOPMENT $1,786,788 TOTAL DIRECT COST Trade Costs $54,490,670 MARKUP General Conditions/Permit/Insurance $5,721,520 Overhead/Fee/Profit $1,806,366 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $62,018,556 CONTINGENCIES/ESCALATION Pricing/Estimating Contingency $5,449,067 Design Contingency $5,449,067 Escalation $6,538,880 Construction Contingency $2,157,831 ESTIMATED CONTRACT AWARD $81,613,401 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 3 Faithful+Gould 267 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY BUILDING SYSTEM SUB-TOTAL TOTAL $/SF A10 FOUNDATIONS A1010 Standard Foundations $778,744 A1020 Special Foundations $1,252,575 A1030 Lowest Floor Construction $863,401 $2,894,720 $15.23 5.3% A20 BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION A2010 Basement Excavation $1,321,815 A2020 Basement Walls $418,180 $1,739,995 $9.15 3.2% B10 SUPERSTRUCTURE B1010 Upper Floor Construction $4,520,966 B1020 Roof Construction $1,185,703 $5,706,669 $30.02 10.5% B20 EXTERIOR CLOSURE B2010 Exterior Walls $3,792,474 B2020 Windows $3,854,960 B2030 Exterior Doors $128,528 $7,775,962 $40.91 14.3% B30 ROOFING B3010 Roof Coverings $696,465 B3020 Roof Openings $18,000 $714,465 $3.76 1.3% C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION C1010 Partitions $4,605,220 C1020 Interior Doors $853,596 C1030 Specialties/Millwork $3,182,583 $8,641,399 $45.46 15.9°% C20 STAIRCASES C2010 Stair Construction $650,850 C2020 Stair Finishes $89,960 $740,810 $3.90 1.4% C30 INTERIOR FINISHES C3010 Wall Finishes $2,858,611 C3020 Floor Finishes $1,467,051 C3030 Ceiling Finishes $1,673,218 $5,998,880 $31.56 11.0% D10 CONVEYING SYSTEMS D1010 Elevator $1,728,250 D1020 Escalators and Moving Walkways $0 D1030 Other Conveying Systems $0 $1,728,250 $9.09 3.2% D20 PLUMBING D20 Plumbing $1,196,750 $1,196,750 $6.30 2.2% Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 4 Faithful+Gould 268 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY BUILDING SYSTEM SUB-TOTAL TOTAL $/SF I. D30 HVAC D30 HVAC $6,449,964 $6,449,964 $33.93 11.8% D40 FIRE PROTECTION D40 Fire Protection $1,012,917 $1,012,917 $5.33 1.9% D50 ELECTRICAL D5010 Service&Distribution $1,457,688 D5020 Lighting&Power $29290,356 D5030 Communication&Security Systems $1,992,496 D5040 Other Electrical Systems $211,561 $5,952,101 $31.32 10.9% E10 EQUIPMENT E10 Equipment $5299000 $529,000 $2.78 1.0% E20 FURNISHINGS E2010 Fixed Furnishings $65,000 E2020 Movable Furnishings NIC $65,000 $0.34 0.1% F10 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION F10 Special Construction $0 $0 $0.00 0.0% F20 SELECTIVE DEMOLITION&CHURCH MOVE F2010 Building Elements Demolition $1,557,000 F2020 Hazardous Components Abatement $0 $1,557,000 $8.19 2.9% G SITE PREP/DEVELOPMENT G10 Site Preparation/Demolition $144,811 G20 Site Improvements $1,112,303 G30 Civil/Mechanical Utilities $276,424 G40 Electrical Utilities $253,250 G90 Other Site Construction $0 $1,786,788 $9.40 3.3% TOTAL DIRECT COST Trade Costs $54 490 670 $286.69 100.0% MARK UP General Conditions/Permit/Insurance $5,721,520 Overhead/Fee/Profit $1,806,366 $7,527,886 $39.61 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $62 018 556 $326.29 CONTINGENCIES/ESCALATION Pricing/Estimating Contingency $5,449,067 Design Contingency $5,449,067 Escalation $6,538,880 Construction Contingency $2,157,831 $19,594,845 $103.09 ESTIMATED CONTRACT AWARD $81,613,401 $429.38 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 5 Faithful+Gould 269 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST GROSS FLOOR AREA CALCULATION z 3 Ground Floor 33,655 4 First Floor 37,009 5 Second Floor 32,029 6 Third Floor 35,274 7 Fourth Floor 34,045 8 Mezzanine 6,571 9 Fifth Floor 11,488 m 11 TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA(GFA) 190,071 sf 12 13 14 A10 FOUNDATIONS 15 16 A1010 STANDARD FOUNDATIONS 17 Strip footings to basement walls at main buildina-3'- 6"x 2'-0" 18 Excavation 191 cy 8.00 1,528 19 Remove off site 191 cy 15.00 2,865 20 Backfill with gravel 32 cy 20.00 640 21 Formwork 2,340 sf 10.00 23,400 22 Re-bar-70#cy 11,130 Ibs 0.85 9,461 23 Concrete material 159 cy 105.00 16,695 24 Placing concrete 159 cy 50.00 7,950 25 Strip footings to foundation walls at main building-3'- 6"x 2'-0" 26 Excavation 242 cy 8.00 1,936 27 Remove off site 242 cy 15.00 3,630 28 Backfill with gravel 40 cy 20.00 800 29 Formwork 2,975 sf 10.00 29,750 30 Re-bar-70#cy 14,140 Ibs 0.85 12,019 31 Concrete material 202 cy 105.00 21,210 32 Placing concrete 202 cy 50.00 10,100 33 Strip footinas to basement walls at Law Library.-3-6" x 2'-0„ 34 Excavation 126 cy 8.00 1,008 35 Remove off site 126 cy 15.00 1,890 36 Backfill with gravel 21 cy 20.00 420 37 Formwork 1,550 sf 10.00 15,500 38 Re-bar-70#cy 7,350 Ibs 0.85 6,248 33 Concrete material 105 cy 105.00 11,025 40 Placing concrete 105 cy 50.00 5,250 41 Spread footinas.4'0"x 4'0"x 1'-0"(a)Law Library 15 ea - 42 Excavation 142 cy 8.00 1,136 43 Remove off site 142 cy 15.00 2,130 44 Backfill with gravel 133 cy 20.00 2,660 45 Formwork 240 sf 10.00 2,400 46 Re-bar,allow 80#/cy 720 Ibs 0.85 612 47 Concrete material 9 cy 105.00 945 48 Placing concrete 9 cy 50.00 450 49 Set anchor bolts&grout plates 15 ea 125.00 1,875 50 Pile cap,6'x 4' 101 ea - 51 Excavation 1,547 cy 8.00 12,376 52 Remove of site 1,547 cy 15.00 23,205 53 Backfill with gravel 1,248 cy 20.00 24,960 54 Formwork 6,403 sf 10.00 64,030 55 Re-bar,allow 90#/cy 26,910 Ibs 0.85 22,874 56 Concrete material 299 cy 105.00 31,395 57 Placing concrete 299 cy 50.00 14,950 58 Set anchor bolts grout plates 101 ea 125.00 12,625 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 6 Faithful+Gould 270 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUS TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 59 Exterior Foundation Wall-18"th 595 If - 60 Formwork 5,950 sf 10.00 59,500 61 Re-bar-90#/cy 15,660 Ibs 0.92 14,407 62 Concrete material 174 cy 102.00 17,748 63 Placing concrete 174 cy 50.00 8,700 64 Waterproofing foundation wall and footing 3,570 sf 1.00 3,570 65 Insulation to foundation walls 2,380 sf 1.00 2,380 66 Grade beams to interior at bracing areas of slab-V- 6"x 3'deep 1,800 If - 67 Excavation 900 cy 9.00 8,100 68 Remove off site 900 cy 15.00 13,500 69 Backfill with gravel 585 cy 20.00 11,700 70 Formwork 10,800 sf 10.00 108,000 71 Re-bar-80#cy 25,200 Ibs 0.92 23,184 72 Concrete material 315 cy 102.00 32,130 73 Placing concrete 315 cy 50.00 15,750 74 Miscellaneous 75 Allow for piers/pilasters @ Law Library 15 ea 500.00 7,500 76 Local de-watering during excavation 1 Is 30,000.00 30,000 77 Miscellaneous concrete costs(pumping,admixtures etc.) 78 Premium for pump grade concrete mix 1,061 cy 7.00 7,427 79 Pump and operator 11.0 days 1,200.00 13,200 80 SUBTOTAL $778,744 81 82 A1020 SPECIAL FOUNDATIONS 83 Mobilization/demobilization associated with piling 1 Is 30,000.00 30,000 84 Testing piles 1 Is 45,000.00 45,000 85 Pressure injected footings 450 ea 2,600.00 1,170,000 86 Cut back/remove top of piles 101 ea 75.00 7,575 87 Allowance for breakages in piles-Not required 88 SUBTOTAL $1,252,575 89 90 A1030 LOWEST FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 91 Two way pressure slab @ new bldg. 37,009 Sf 92 8"drainage layer 918 cy 18.00 16,524 93 3"mud slab 37,009 sf 3.00 111,027 94 10" two way slab w/anti-hydro additive 1,138 cy 110.00 125,180 95 Re-bar for two way slab 301,993 Ibs 0.85 256,694 96 8"gravel/sand layer 1,837 ton 30.00 55,110 97 Wire mesh reinforcing,15%overlap 42,560 sf 0.65 27,664 98 Crystalline waterproofing 74,018 sf 1.25 92,523 99 Slab on Grade.6"thick @ Law Library 4,256 Sf - 100 Gravel fill,12" 158 cy 20.00 3,160 101 Rigid insulation under slab on grade 4,256 sf 1.50 6,384 102 Vapor barrier 4,256 sf 0.25 1,064 103 Mesh reinforcing 15%lap 4,894 sf 0.65 3,181 104 Concrete-6"thick 83 cy 105.00 8,715 105 Place and finish concrete 83 cy 50.00 4,150 106 Control joints-saw cut 4,256 sf 0.35 1,490 107 Perimeter joints 309 If 1.50 464 108 Elevator Pits 109 Excavation for elevator pit 588 cy 9.00 5,292 110 Remove off site 588 cy 15.00 8,820 111 Backfill with gravel 29 cy 20.00 580 112 Elevator pit walls 113 formwork 3,360 sf 12.00 40,320 114 reinforcement 5,040 Ibs 0.85 4,284 115 concrete material 44 cy 105.00 4,620 116 placing concrete 44 cy 50.00 2,200 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 7 Faithful+Gould 271 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESTD SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 117 Slab 178 formwork 420 sf 8.00 3,360 119 reinforcement 5,250 Ibs 0.85 4,463 120 concrete material in slab 41 cy 105.00 4,305 121 placing concrete 41 cy 50.00 2,050 122 Cementitious waterproofing to elevator pit 2,380 sf 9.00 21,420 123 Allow for equipment pads 1 Is 20,000.00 20,000 124 Miscellaneous 125 Isolation joints at columns 808 If 2.50 2,020 126 Perimeter joints 1,063 If 1.50 1,595 127 Miscellaneous concrete costs(pumping,admixtures etc.) 128 Premium for pump grade concrete mix 1,306 cy 7.00 9,142 129 Pump and operator 13.0 days 1,200.00 15,600 130 SUBTOTAL $863,401 131 132 TOTAL-FOUNDATIONS $2,894,720 133 134 135 A20 BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION 136 137 A2010 BASEMENT EXCAVATION 138 Main Building 139 Excavate for basement 16,204 cy 8.00 129,632 140 Excavate working space to basement wall 3,828 cy 8.00 30,624 141 Excavate 2'of subgrade 2,493 cy 7.50 18,698 142 Remove excavated material from site 22,525 cy 15.00 337,875 143 Backfill around basement walls with gravel 3,828 cy 24.00 91,872 144 Compacted structural fill,2' 2,493 cy 24.00 59,832 145 Foundation drainage 1,063 If 18.00 19,134 146 Steel sheet piling support of excavation 19,875 sf 25.00 496,875 147 Law Library 148 Excavate for basement 2,049 cy 8.00 16,392 149 Excavate working space to basement wall 1,488 cy 8.00 11,904 150 Excavate 2'of subgrade 315 cy 7.50 2,363 151 Remove excavated material from site 3,852 cy 15.00 57,780 152 Backfill around basement walls with gravel 1,488 cy 24.00 35,712 153 Compacted structural fill,2' 315 cy 24.00 7,560 154 Foundation drainage 309 If 18.00 5,562 155 SUBTOTAL $1,321,815 156 157 A2020 BASEMENT WALLS 158 Basement Wall at Main Building.18"thick 159 Formwork to basement wall 12,168 sf 12.00 146,016 160 Reinforcement in basement walls(5 Ibs/sf) 30,420 Ibs 0.85 25,857 161 Concrete material in basement walls 355 cy 105.00 37,275 162 Placing concrete 355 cy 50.00 17,750 163 Waterproofing to basement walls 6,084 sf 1.25 7,605 164 Rigid insulation to basement walls 6,084 sf 1.50 9,126 165 Furring&GWB lining to basement walls 6,084 sf 2.50 15,210 166 Basement Wall at Law Library.12"thick 167 Formwork to basement wall 8,060 sf 12.00 96,720 168 Reinforcement in basement walls(5 Ibs/sf) 20,150 Ibs 0.85 17,128 169 Concrete material in basement walls 157 cy 105.00 16,485 170 Placing concrete 157 cy 50.00 7,850 171 Waterproofing to basement walls 4,030 sf 1.25 5,038 172 Rigid insulation to basement walls 4,030 sf 1.50 6,045 173 Furring&GWB lining to basement walls 4,030 sf 2.50 10,075 174 SUBTOTAL $418.180 175 176 TOTAL-BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION $1,739,995 177 178 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 8 Faithful+Gould 272 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'O SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 179 B10 SUPERSTRUCTURE 180 181 B1010 UPPER FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 182 Floor Structure-Steel: 183 Steel beams and columns in floor framing-w sections(12 Ibs/sf) 918 tns 3,100.00 2,845,800 184 Shear studs(20 per 100sf) 30,612 ea 3.00 91,836 185 Metal decking 153,062 sf 2.85 436,227 186 Premium for add'I steel @ compact dense shelving 14 tns 3,100.00 43,400 187 Concrete toppings 188 Mesh reinforcement in concrete topping 176,021 sf 0.65 114,414 189 Concrete topping to metal decking,3-1/4"thick 2,381 cy 105.00 250,005 190 Place and finish concrete 2,381 cy 50.00 119,050 191 Control and construction joints 153,062 sf 0.35 53,572 192 Miscellaneous 193 Miscellaneous concrete costs(pumping,admixtures etc.) 194 Premium for pump grade concrete mix 2,381 cy 7.00 16,667 195 Pump and operator 24.0 days 1,200.00 28,800 196 Fire proofing floor construction,(beams and columns only) 153,062 sf plan 2.00 306,124 197 Fire stopping floors 5 firs 5,000.00 25,000 198 Allowance for miscellaneous metals not identifiable at this design stage 190,071 sf 1.00 190,071 199 SUBTOTAL $4,520,966 200 201 B1020 ROOF CONSTRUCTION 202 Structural Steel Roof 203 Steel beams and columns in flat roof framing-w sections(14.5 Ibs/sf) 268 tns 3,100.00 830,800 204 Metal decking to flat roof 37,009 sf 2.85 105,476 205 Concrete too0nas(assume rea'd over whole area) 206 Mesh reinforcement in concrete topping 42,560 sf 0.65 27,664 207 Concrete topping to metal decking,3-1/4"thick 576 cy 105.00 60,480 208 Place and finish concrete 576 cy 50.00 28,800 209 Control and construction joints 37,009 sf 0.35 12,953 210 Miscellaneous 211 Miscellaneous concrete costs(pumping,admixtures etc.) 212 Premium for pump grade concrete mix 576 cy 7.00 4,032 213 Pump and operator 6.0 days 1,200.00 7,200 214 Lightweight concrete 576 cy 30.00 17,280 215 Fire proofing roof construction(beams and columns only) 37,009 sf plan 2.00 74,018 216 Fire stopping 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 217 Allowance for work to Law Library 1 Is 12,000.00 12,000 218 SUBTOTAL $1,185,703 219 220 TOTAL-SUPERSTRUCTURE $5,706,669 221 222 223 B20 EXTERIOR CLOSURE 224 225 B2010 EXTERIOR WALLS 226 Exterior skin 227 Stone cladding,1 1/2"granite 11,631 Sf 70.00 814,170 228 Anodized aluminum non-insulated panels 9,516 sf 30.00 285,480 229 Brick veneer 33,410 sf 32.00 1,069,120 230 Stone cladding,1 1/2"granite @ columns 4,572 sf 80.00 365,760 231 Lintels-steel 3,178 If 25.00 79,450 232 Louvers 180 sf 50.00 9,000 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 9 Faithful+Gould 273 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'O SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 233 Interior skin 234 LGMF,6"metal stud 59,129 sf 7.00 413,903 235 Insulation 59,129 sf 0.75 44,347 236 Vapor barrier 59,129 sf 1.60 94,606 237 Dens-glas 59,129 sf 3.50 206,952 238 Drywall lining to interior face of stud backup 54,557 sf 2.00 109,114 239 Miscellaneous 240 Scaffolding to exterior wall 108,119 sf 2.00 216,238 241 Flashings at sills and lintels 6,356 If 7.00 44,492 242 Flashing,thruwall,at parpet 1,522 If 15.00 22,830 243 Control joints in exterior wall 1,753 If 4.00 7,012 244 Allowance for work to Law Library 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 245 SUBTOTAL $3,792,474 246 247 B2020 WINDOWS 248 Curtainwall,including windows(fixed&operable) 45,632 sf 80.00 3,650,560 249 Metal trim 845 If 35.00 29,575 250 Sunshades,fixed 1,295 If 135.00 174,825 251 SUBTOTAL 3,854,960 252 253 B2030 EXTERIOR DOORS 254 Egress doors,single leaf,hollow metal 5 ea 2,000.00 10,000 255 Entry doors,glazed,single leaf 2 ea 3,500.00 7,000 256 Entry doors,glazed,double leaf 2 ea 6,000.00 12,000 257 Door operator 4 ea 2,000.00 8,000 258 Overhead doors 259 Sallyport,11x8(dbl.door) 1 ea 9,240.00 9,240 260 Loading dock,8x8 3 ea 4,800.00 14,400 261 Trash area,9x8 1 ea 5,400.00 5,400 262 Revolving door,V diam 1 ea 45,000.00 45,000 263 Automatic controls to revolving door 1 Is 16,000.00 16,000 264 Paint to doors 5 ea 75.00 375 265 Backer rod&double sealant 159 If 4.00 636 266 Wood blocking at openings 159 If 3.00 477 267 SUBTOTAL $128,528 266 269 TOTAL-EXTERIOR CLOSURE $7,775,962 270 271 272 830 ROOFING 273 274 B3010 ROOF COVERINGS 275 Flat roofing 276 3-ply modified bitumen roof 37,009 sf 10.50 388,595 277 Insulation tapered 37,009 sf 3.50 129,532 276 Fiberboard/gypsum sheathing and the like to roof-1 layers 37,009 sf 2.00 74,018 279 Miscellaneous Roofing 280 Allowance for working membrane roofing around pipe and duct penetrations 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 281 Flashings 1,522 If 10.00 15,220 262 Parapet coping 1,522 If 50.00 76,100 263 Roof pavers,allow 2,000 sf 4.00 8,000 284 SUBTOTAL $696,465 285 286 B3020 ROOF OPENINGS 287 Precurbed pyramidal skylights,5'x5' 4 ea 2,000.00 8,000 288 Allow for roof hatch/elevator vents 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 289 SUBTOTAL 18,000 290 291 TOTAL-ROOFING $714 465 292 293 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 10 Faithful+Gould 274 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTV UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 294 C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION 295 296 C1010 PARTITIONS 297 Interior cmu partitions,8"thick,fully grouted, reinforced at detainee areas 31,177 sf 18.00 561,186 304 CMU mechanical rooms 2,795 sf 18.00 50,310 307 Shaft wall around staircases,elevators and mechanical shafts-CMU 45,763 sf 18.00 823,734 314 Double stud wall at courtrooms-high STC rating, double studs,insulation,1 layer GWB a/s,1 layer impact resistant GWB 27,811 sf 13.40 372,667 321 Interior partitions,6"stud,one layer GWB a/s,one layer impact-resistant GWB a/s,batt insulation-parry walls 24,564 sf 16.00 393,024 328 Interior partitions,6"stud,one layer gwb a/s,one layer impact-resistant GWB a/s,batt insulation 83,742 sf 12.50 1,046,775 335 Chase wall partitions 5,273 sf 12.00 63,276 342 Premium cost for veneer plaster to gwb-Allowance (Public areas and courtrooms,above panels) 23,636 sf 2.75 64,999 343 Furring&impact resistant GWB lining to cmu walls 73,561 sf 5.00 367,805 350 Glazed partitions at suite entries 1,197 sf 55.00 65,835 351 Secure glass at control area 168 sf 120.00 20,160 352 Observation windows 8 ea 1,500.00 12,000 353 Borrowed lites at perimeter offices 1,348 sf 50.00 67,400 354 Glass at open to below areas 1,274 sf 85.00 108,290 355 GWB column covers-allowance 1 Is 20,000.00 20,000 356 Sealants&caulking at partitions 190,071 sf 0.35 66,525 357 Rough blocking 31,192 If 2.00 62,384 358 Lintels in masonry partitions 530 If 25.00 13,250 359 Allowance for work to Law Library(complete- partitions,doors,windows,interior finishes, specialties/millwork)including basement 8,512 sf 50.00 425,600 360 SUBTOTAL 4,605,220 361 362 C1020 INTERIOR DOORS 363 Doors,frames&hardware 364 single leaf,wood/HIM 331 ea 1,100.00 364,100 365 double leaf,wood/HIM 5 pr 2,025.00 10,125 366 premium for judge's door 13 ea 750.00 9,750 367 single leaf,secure 28 ea 3,000.00 84,000 368 Suite entrances 369 single leaf 8 ea 1,250.00 10,000 370 double leaf 4 pr 3,500.00 14,000 371 Courtroom entrance doors 22 or 10,000.00 220,000 372 Sidelights-2'wide 82 ea 720.00 59,040 373 Paint doors and frames 385 ea 100.00 38,500 374 Sealants&caulking 385 ea 75.00 28,875 375 Allowance for access doors 1 Is 15,205.68 15,206 376 SUBTOTAL $853,596 377 378 C1030 SPECIALTIES/MILLWORK 379 Toilet Partitions;handicapped 18 ea 1,200.00 21,600 380 Toilet Partitions;regular 17 ea 1,000.00 17,000 381 Toilet Partitions;urinal screens 17 ea 400.00 6,800 382 Miscellaneous metal to ceiling supported toilet partitions 35 ea 150.00 5,250 383 Vanity counters,granite surface 156 If 200.00 31,200 384 Security desk-allow 30 If 1,000.00 30,000 385 Information desk-allow 14 If 1,000.00 14,000 386 Information display-allowance 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 387 Public waiting benches-allow 378 If 500.00 189,000 388 Grand jury reception desk-allow 13 If 1,000.00 13,000 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 11 Faithful+Gould 275 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTV UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 369 Transaction counters 119 If 1,250.00 148,750 390 Break room/kitchenette-allow 6 ea 391 Base cabinet and countertop 60 If 300.00 18,000 392 Wall cabinet 60 If 200.00 12,000 393 Wood shelving at judges chambers-Allowance 1 Is 15,000.00 15,000 394 Shelving in storage rooms-FF&E NIC 395 Concessions fitout-allowance 1 Is 15,000.00 15,000 396 SC Arraignment Courtroom 1 ea - 397 Judge's platform 70 sf 20.00 1,400 393 Judge's bench 10 If 1,800.00 18,000 399 Witness stand 1 ea 10,000.00 10,000 400 Detainee enclosure-glass 63 sf 250.00 15,750 401 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 42 If 300.00 12,600 402 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 34 If 300.00 10,200 403 Rail behind judge's bench 10 If 175.00 1,750 404 Wood shelving behind judge 25 If 50.00 1,250 405 Court clerk platform 25 sf 20.00 500 406 Court clerk bench 4 If 1,000.00 4,000 407 Side bar 1 ea 12,000.00 12,000 408 Attorneys tables 2 ea 3,000.00 6,000 409 Officers bench-3 ea 9 If 1,000.00 9,000 410 Spectator benches 250 If 350.00 87,500 411 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 16 sf 25.00 400 412 Rail to ramp 8 If 200.00 1,600 413 SC Large Jury Courtroom 3 ea - 414 Jury platform 408 sf 20.00 8,160 415 Judge's platform 210 sf 20.00 4,200 416 Judge's bench 30 If 1,800.00 54,000 417 Witness stand 3 ea 10,000.00 30,000 418 Detainee enclosure-glass 189 sf 250.00 47,250 419 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 126 If 300.00 37,800 420 Wood wall/rail @ jury stand 90 If 300.00 27,000 421 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 102 If 300.00 30,600 422 Foot rail @ jury stand 105 If 150.00 15,750 423 Rail behind judge's bench 30 If 175.00 5,250 424 Wood shelving behind judge 75 If 50.00 3,750 425 Court clerk platform 60 sf 20.00 1,200 426 Court clerk bench 12 If 1,000.00 12,000 427 Side bar 3 ea 12,000.00 36,000 423 Attorneys tables 6 ea 3,000.00 18,000 429 Officers bench-3 ea 27 If 1,000.00 27,000 430 Jury seats-FF&E NIC 431 Spectator benches 750 If 350.00 262,500 432 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 48 sf 25.00 1,200 433 Rail to ramp 24 If 200.00 4,800 434 DC Arraignment Courtroom 1 ea - 435 Judge's platform 70 sf 20.00 1,400 436 Judge's bench 10 If 1,800.00 18,000 437 Witness stand 1 ea 10,000.00 10,000 438 Detainee enclosure-glass 63 sf 250.00 15,750 439 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 42 If 300.00 12,600 440 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 34 If 300.00 10,200 441 Rail behind judge's bench 105 If 175.00 18,375 442 Wood shelving behind judge 25 If 50.00 1,250 443 Court clerk platform 25 sf 20.00 500 444 Court clerk bench 4 If 1,000.00 4,000 445 Side bar 1 ea 12,000.00 12,000 446 Attorneys tables 2 ea 3,000.00 6,000 447 Officers bench-3 ea 9 If 1,000.00 9,000 448 Spectator benches 250 If 350.00 87,500 449 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 16 sf 25.00 400 450 Rail to ramp 8 If 200.00 1,600 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 12 Faithful+Gould 276 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 451 DC Large Jury Courtroom 1 ea - 452 Jury platform 136 sf 20.00 2,720 453 Judge's platform 70 sf 20.00 1,400 454 Judge's bench 10 If 1,800.00 18,000 455 Witness stand 1 ea 10,000.00 10,000 456 Detainee enclosure-glass 63 sf 250.00 15,750 457 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 42 If 300.00 12,600 458 Wood wall/rail @ jury stand 30 If 300.00 9,000 459 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 34 If 300.00 10,200 460 Foot rail @ jury stand 35 If 150.00 5,250 461 Rail behind judge's bench 10 If 175.00 1,750 462 Wood shelving behind judge 25 If 50.00 1,250 463 Court clerk platform 20 sf 20.00 400 464 Court clerk bench 4 If 1,000.00 4,000 465 Side bar 1 ea 12,000.00 12,000 466 Attorneys tables 2 ea 3,000.00 6,000 467 Officers bench-3 ea 9 If 1,000.00 91000 468 Jury seats-FF&E NIC 469 Spectator benches 250 If 350.00 87,500 470 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 16 sf 25.00 400 471 Rail to ramp 8 If 200.00 1,600 472 DC Medium Jury Courtroom 2 ea - 473 Jury platform 272 sf 20.00 5,440 474 Judge's platform 140 sf 20.00 2,800 475 Judge's bench 20 If 1,800.00 36,000 476 Witness stand 2 ea 10,000.00 20,000 477 Detainee enclosure-glass 126 sf 250.00 31,500 478 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 84 If 300.00 25,200 479 Wood wall/rail @ jury stand 60 If 300.00 18,000 480 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 68 If 300.00 20,400 481 Foot rail @ jury stand 70 If 150.00 10,500 482 Rail behind judge's bench 20 If 175.00 3,500 4e3 Wood shelving behind judge 50 If 50.00 2,500 484 Court clerk platform 40 sf 20.00 800 485 Court clerk bench 8 If 1,000.00 8,000 486 Side bar 2 ea 12,000.00 24,000 487 Attorneys tables 4 ea 3,000.00 12,000 486 Officers bench-3 ea 18 If 1,000.00 18,000 489 Jury seats-FF&E NIC 490 Spectator benches 168 If 350.00 58,800 491 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 32 sf 25.00 800 492 Rail to ramp 16 If 200.00 3,200 493 Housing Large Jury Courtroom 1 ea - 494 Jury platform 136 sf 20.00 2,720 495 Judge's platform 70 sf 20.00 1,400 496 Judge's bench 10 If 1,800.00 18,000 497 Witness stand 1 ea 10,000.00 10,000 498 Detainee enclosure-glass 63 sf 250.00 15,750 499 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 42 If 300.00 12,600 500 Wood wall/rail @ jury stand 30 If 300.00 9,000 501 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 34 If 300.00 10,200 502 Foot rail Co)jury stand 35 If 150.00 5,250 503 Rail behind judge's bench 10 If 175.00 1,750 504 Wood shelving behind judge 25 If 50.00 1,250 505 Court clerk platform 20 sf 20.00 400 506 Court clerk bench 4 If 1,000.00 4,000 507 Side bar 1 ea 12,000.00 12,000 508 Attorneys tables 2 ea 3,000.00 6,000 509 Officers bench-3 ea 9 If 1,000.00 9,000 510 Jury seats-FF&E NIC 511 Spectator benches 250 If 350.00 87,500 512 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 16 sf 25.00 400 513 Rail to ramp 8 If 200.00 1,600 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 13 Faithful+Gould 277 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTV UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 514 Juvenile Jury Courtroom 2 ea - 515 Jury platform 272 sf 20.00 5,440 516 Judge's platform 140 sf 20.00 2,800 517 Judge's bench 20 If 1,800.00 36,000 516 Witness stand 2 ea 10,000.00 20,000 519 Detainee enclosure-glass 126 sf 250.00 31,500 520 Detainee enclosure-to 4' 84 If 300.00 25,200 521 Wood wall/rail @ jury stand 60 If 300.00 18,000 522 Wood wall/rail @ spectators 68 If 300.00 20,400 523 Foot rail @ jury stand 70 If 150.00 10,500 524 Rail behind judge's bench 20 If 175.00 3,500 525 Wood shelving behind judge 50 If 50.00 2,500 526 Court clerk platform 40 sf 20.00 800 527 Court clerk bench 8 If 1,000.00 8,000 528 Side bar 2 ea 12,000.00 24,000 529 Attorneys tables 4 ea 3,000.00 12,000 530 Officers bench-3 ea 18 If 1,000.00 18,000 531 Jury seats-FF&E NIC 532 Spectator benches 168 If 350.00 58,800 533 Access Ramps to Judge Bench 32 sf 25.00 800 534 Rail to ramp 16 If 200.00 3,200 535 Rail at open to below area 21 If 450.00 9,450 536 White boards/tackboards-Allowance 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 537 Signage/Directories-Allowance 190,071 sf 1.00 190,071 538 Fire extinguisher cabinets-allowance 1 Is 20,000.00 20,000 539 Janitors Accessories-allowance 5 rms 500.00 2,500 540 Toilet Accessories in small bathrooms-allowance 33 rms 750.00 24,750 541 Toilet Accessories in large bathrooms-allowance 18 rms 2,000.00 36,000 542 Lockers 80 ea 195.00 15,600 543 Allowance for specialties not identifiable at this design stage 190,071 sf 1.00 190,071 544 Miscellaneous sealants throughout building 190,071 sf 0.50 95,036 545 SUBTOTAL $3,182,583 546 547 TOTAL-INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $8,641,399 548 549 550 C20 STAIRCASES 551 552 C2010 STAIR CONSTRUCTION 553 Feature staircase-custom metal frame and railings 554 floor 1-2 4 fits 50,000.00 200,000 555 Glass Rail at Landings 83 If 450.00 37,350 556 Egress staircase,including rails and handrails 27 fit 15,000.00 405,000 557 concrete material in pan infill 50 cy 105.00 5,250 556 placing and finishing concrete 50 cy 65.00 3,250 559 SUBTOTAL $650,850 560 561 C2020 STAIR FINISHES 562 Granite treads 1,277 sf 40.00 51,080 563 Stained/sealed concrete 5,130 sf 1.00 5,130 564 Paint and concrete sealer to egress staircases 27 fit 1,250.00 33,750 565 SUBTOTAL $89,960 566 567 TOTAL-STAIRCASES $740,810 568 569 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 14 Faithful+Gould 278 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPT/ON OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 570 C30 INTERIOR FINISHES 571 572 C3010 WALL FINISHES 573 Wood wainscot at courtrooms and grand jury room- 5'high 10,590 sf 60.00 635,400 574 Wood wainscot at judge's offices and court conference rooms-30%wall surface 5,874 sf 60.00 352,440 575 Paint toGWB 333,021 sf 0.70 233,115 576 Paint to CMU-epoxy 41,233 sf 2.00 82,466 577 Glazed wall finish at toilet rooms 13,284 sf 2.00 26,568 578 Ceramic tile to public toilets,6' 9,936 sf 12.00 119,232 579 Fabric wrapped acoustic panels 7,943 sf 30.00 238,290 580 Stone to walls at public spaces and transaction areas- 10' 16,730 sf 70.00 1,171,100 581 SUBTOTAL $2,858,611 562 583 C3020 FLOOR FINISHES 584 1'x 2'large format porcelain tile to public spaces 24,735 sf 22.00 544,170 585 Courtrooms-carpet 23,213 sf 5.00 116,065 586 Carpeting 106,587 sf 4.00 426,348 587 Ceramic tiles in bathrooms 5,973 sf 11.00 65,703 588 Wood base at courtrooms 2,114 If 20.00 42,280 569 Wood base at judge's offices,court conference rooms 1,958 If 12.00 23,496 590 Granite base 2,806 If 30.00 84,180 591 Tile base 2,580 If 12.00 30,960 592 Vinyl base 18,803 If 2.50 47,008 593 Marble thresholds @ bathrooms 51 ea 55.00 2,805 594 Epoxy resin flooring at detainee areas 10,508 sf 7.00 73,556 595 Concrete sealer @ sallyport(No traffic topping),mech rooms 19,055 sf 0.55 10,480 596 SUBTOTAL 1,467,051 597 598 C3030 CEILING FINISHES 599 Ceiling at public spaces-GW B w/veneer plaster- Allowance 24,735 sf 15.00 371,025 600 Ceiling at courtrooms-Plaster/GW B/Coffers- Allowance 23,213 sf 20.00 464,260 601 Ceiling at judge's offices,court conference rooms- GW B w/veneer plaster-Allowance 6,431 sf 15.00 96,465 604 GWB at bathrooms 5,973 sf 8.00 47,784 605 ACT 100,156 sf 4.00 400,624 606 Secure metal ceiling at detainee areas 10,508 sf 20.00 210,160 607 Paint to ceilings 60,352 sf 0.90 54,317 608 Paint to exposed structure and exposed MEP systems,sprayed 19,055 sf 1.50 28,583 609 SUBTOTAL $1,673,218 610 611 TOTAL-INTERIOR FINISHES $5,998,880 612 613 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 15 Faithful+Gould 279 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPT/ON QTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 614 D10 CONVEYING SYSTEMS 615 616 D1010 ELEVATOR 617 All electric traction elevators 618 Public,E-2,front opening,5-stop,3500 lb capacity 1 ea 160,000.00 160,000 619 Public,E-3,front opening,5-stop,3500 lb capacity 1 ea 160,000.00 160,000 620 Public,EA front opening,4-stop,3500 lb capacity 1 ea 139,000.00 139,000 621 Premium for cab finishes 3 ea 25,000.00 75,000 622 Judges,E-6,front opening,7-stop,3000 lb capacity 1 ea 197,000.00 197,000 623 Judges,E-7,front opening,7-stop,3000 lb capacity 1 ea 197,000.00 197,000 624 Judges,E-9,front opening,3-stop,3000 lb capacity 1 ea 113,000.00 113,000 625 Premium for cab finishes 3 ea 25,000.00 75,000 626 Prisoner,E-1,front&rear opening,3-stop,3500 lb capacity 1 ea 148,000.00 148,000 627 Prisoner,E-5,front&rear opening,4-stop,3500 lb capacity 1 ea 169,000.00 169,000 628 Prisoner,E-8,front&rear opening,4-stop,3500 lb capacity 1 ea 169,000.00 169,000 629 Law library,front opening,2-stop,3000 lb capacity 1 ea 100,000.00 100,000 630 Premium for cab finishes 1 ea 15,000.00 15,000 631 Pit ladders 7 ea 350.00 2,450 632 Sill angles 352 If 25.00 8,800 633 SUBTOTAL 1,728,250 634 635 D1020 ESCALATORS&MOVING WALKWAYS 636 No items in this section 637 SUBTOTAL $0 638 639 D1030 OTHER CONVEYING SYSTEMS 640 No items in this section 641 SUBTOTAL $0 642 643 TOTAL-CONVEYING SYSTEMS $1,728,250 644 645 646 D20 PLUMBING 647 648 D20 PLUMBING,GENERALLY 649 Gas fired water heater 2 ea 10,000.00 20,000 650 Water service,4" 1 ea 7,500.00 7,500 651 Thermostatic mixing valve 1 ea 3,200.00 3,200 652 RPBP(HVAC) 2 ea 1,700.00 3,400 653 Duplex domestic water booster pump 1 ea 10,000.00 10,000 654 HW Recirculating pump 1 ea 1,200.00 1,200 655 Valves,specialties,etc 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 656 SUBTOTAL $55,300 657 Fixtures,including piping 182 ea 3,000.00 546,000 658 Watercloset 68 ea 659 Lavatory 85 ea 660 Urinal 17 ea 661 kitchen sink,SS 2 ea 662 Drinking fountain 6 ea 663 Janitor's service basin 4 ea 664 WC-LAV Security combo;wall hung, 35 ea 10,000.00 350,000 665 Floor drain/secure 35 ea 450.00 15,750 666 Hose bibb 20 ea 110.00 2,200 667 Wall hydrant 10 ea 300.00 3,000 668 SUBTOTAL $916,950 669 Storm drainage 670 Roof drains,complete (allowance) 15 ea 3,000.00 45,000 671 SUBTOTAL $45,000 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 16 Faithful+Gould 280 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'D SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 672 Natural Gas 673 Piping&connection to HW heaters&boilers 1 Is 20,000.00 20,000 674 SUBTOTAL $20,000 675 Miscellaneous 676 Work associated with general construction 1 Is 90,000.00 90,000 677 Testing&disinfection 1 Is 12,000.00 12,000 676 Shop drawings,coordination 1 Is 15,000.00 15,000 679 Commissioning 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 660 Permit,fees 1 Is 8,000.00 8,000 661 SUBTOTAL $135,000 682 683 Work @ Law Library/Church 664 Water service 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 665 Water heater,point of use 1 Is 500.00 500 686 Valves&specialties 1 Is 2,500.00 2,500 667 SUBTOTAL $8,000 668 Fixtures,including oioina 3 ea 3,000.00 9,000 669 Watercloset 1 ea 0 690 Lavatory 1 ea 0 691 Janitor's service basin 1 ea 0 692 SUBTOTAL $9,000 693 Storm drainaae oioina 694 Gutters&downspouts-NIC 695 SUBTOTAL $0 696 Miscellaneous 697 Work associated w/general construction 1 Is 4,000.00 4,000 696 Testing&disinfection 1 Is 1,000.00 1,000 699 Shop drawings,coordination,fees,etc. 1 Is 2,500.00 2,500 700 SUBTOTAL $7,500 701 702 TOTAL-PLUMBING $1,196,750 703 704 705 D30 HVAC 706 707 D30 HVAC,GENERALLY 708 Heating 709 Boiler,Hot water,3 @ 100 BHP 300 hp 400.00 120,000 710 -Boiler flues&breeching 1 Is 20,000.00 20,000 711 Pump,Hot water,230 gpm w/VFD 7 ea 4,000.00 28,000 712 Radiation,UH's,etc 188,331 sf 2.00 376,662 713 Piping,valves,etc 188,331 sf 4.00 753,324 714 Valves,specialties,etc 1 Is 150,000.00 150,000 715 SUBTOTAL $1,447,986 716 COolina 717 Chiller,water cooled w/VFD-2 @ 275 ton 560 ea 500.00 280,000 718 Cooling Tower,w/VFD-2@ 280 ton 560 ea 200.00 112,000 719 Pump,Chilled water,w/VFD,550 gpm 6 ea 5,000.00 30,000 720 -VFD's 6 ea 6,000.00 36,000 721 Pump.Condenser water,825 glom 3 ea 6,500.00 19,500 722 Condenser water piping(assume 8") 1 Is 80,000.00 80,000 723 -Equipment connections 1 Is 45,000.00 45,000 724 Chilled water piping 1 Is 120,000.00 120,000 725 -Equipment connections 1 Is 80,000.00 80,000 726 Valves,specialties 1 Is 65,000.00 65,000 727 SUBTOTAL $867,500 726 Radiant slab system 729 Piping,valves,etc(allowance) 6,000 sf 12.00 72,000 730 SUBTOTAL $72,000 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 17 Faithful+Gould 281 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESTO SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTV UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 731 Air distribution 732 Outdoor Air Handling Units,w/Heating&Cooling coils,SA&RA fans&Energy Recovery Enthalpy Wheel 733 OSA-1 22,000 cfm 5.50 121,000 734 -OSA-2 22,000 cfm 5.50 121,000 735 OSA-3 14,000 cfm 5.50 77,000 736 Recirculating Air Handling Units,w/Heating& Cooling coils,SA&RA fans&Economizer section 737 AHU-1-4(22,000 cfm ea) 88,000 cfm 3.75 330,000 738 -AHU-5+6(14,000 cfm ea) 28,000 cfm 3.75 105,000 739 Terminal units 188,331 sf 1.00 188,331 740 Special rooms cooled by main building system 741 Elev.Machine rooms 4 ea 742 Tel/data rooms 1 ea 743 Fans 744 Stair-well presurization 5 ea 15,000.00 75,000 745 Elevator pressurization 5 ea 5,000.00 25,000 746 Loading dock ventilation 1 ea 4,000.00 4,000 747 Exhaust,toilet 3 ea 3,000.00 9,000 748 Mechanical/electric rooms 4 ea 1,200.00 4,800 749 SUBTOTAL $1,060,131 750 Sheet metal 751 Galvanized steel ductwork 188,331 lb 8.50 1,600,814 752 Air distribution devices 188,331 sf 1.25 235,414 753 SUBTOTAL $1,836,228 754 Building Automatic Control System 755 HVAC equipment 188,331 sf 3.25 612,076 756 SUBTOTAL $612,076 757 Miscellaneous 758 Testing&balancing 188,331 sf 0.30 56,499 759 Work associated with general construction 1 Is 188,000.00 188,000 760 Shop drawings,coordination,fees,etc. 188,331 sf 0.25 47,083 761 SUBTOTAL $291,582 762 Work 0 Law Library/Church 763 Heating 8,512 sf 6.00 51,072 764 Cooling 8,512 sf 5.00 42,560 765 Air Distribution 766 Air Handling Units,preheat&cooling coils,VAV 12,000 cfm 3.50 42,000 767 Terminal units,fans,etc 8,512 sf 1.00 8,512 768 Sheet Metal 8,512 sf 10.00 85,120 769 Controls 8,512 sf 2.50 21,280 770 Testing and balancing 8,512 sf 0.30 2,554 771 Work associated with general construction 8,512 Is 1.00 8,512 772 Shop drawinas,coordination,fees.etc. 8,512 sf 0.10 851 773 SUBTOTAL $262,461 774 775 TOTAL-HVAC $6,449,964 776 777 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 18 Faithful+Gould 282 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESPD SUB TOTAL DESCRIPT/ON QTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 778 D40 FIRE PROTECTION 779 780 D40 FIRE PROTECTION,GENERALLY 781 Fire pump assembly 1 ea 60,000.00 60,000 782 Double check valve assembly-8" 1 ea 9,700.00 9,700 783 Master alarm valve assembly-8" 1 ea 5,800.00 5,800 784 Pre-action valve assembly 1 ea 3,000.00 3,000 785 Dry pipe valve assembly 1 ea 3,000.00 3,000 786 Fire Department connection 1 ea 1,200.00 1,200 787 Fire pump test connection 1 ea 1,000.00 1,000 788 Floor control valve assembly 5 ea 1,000.00 5,000 789 Fire department valve(allowance) 25 ea 350.00 8,750 790 Sprinkler head w/complete piping system 188,331 sf 4.25 800,407 791 Miscellaneous 792 Valves,specialties 1 Is 30,000.00 30,000 793 Hydraulic calculations,shop drawings,coordination 1 Is 15,000.00 15,000 794 Commissioning 1 Is 20,000.00 20,000 795 Permit,fees 1 Is 7,500.00 7,500 796 Work(a)Law Library/Church 797 Allowance for fire protection 8,512 sf 5.00 42,560 798 SUBTOTAL 1,012,917 799 800 TOTAL-FIRE PROTECTION $1,012,917 801 802 803 D50 ELECTRICAL 804 805 D5010 SERVICE&DISTRIBUTION 806 Service and distribution clear 807 Normal power service and distirbution gear 808 4000A 277/480V switchboard 2 ea 120,000.00 240,000 809 1600A 277/480V switchboard 2 ea 45,000.00 90,000 810 277/480V panelboard 7 ea 4,000.00 28,000 871 277/480V double tub panelboard 5 ea 7,000.00 35,000 812 112.5KVA dry type transformer 2 ea 6,150.00 12,300 813 120/208V panelboard 12 ea 2,000.00 24,000 814 Normal power feeders 190,071 sf 1.50 285,107 815 Grounding and bonding 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 816 Generator Power 817 1250KW 277/480V diesel powered generator set in weather proof enclosure 1 Is 255,000.00 255,000 818 Hoisting 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 819 Life safety automatic transfer switch 1 ea 9,000.00 9,000 820 Elevator automatic transfer switch 1 ea 6,500.00 6,500 821 Standby automatic transfer switch 1 ea 9,000.00 9,000 822 277/480V switchboard 1 ea 20,000.00 20,000 823 277/480V panelboard 4 ea 4,000.00 16,000 824 Dry type transformer 4 ea 4,500.00 18,000 825 120/208V panelboard 4 ea 2,000.00 8,000 826 Generator power feeders 190,071 sf 0.75 142,553 827 Law Library 828 400A 277/480V panelboard 1 ea 4,500.00 4,500 829 45KVA dry type transformer 1 ea 3,250.00 3,250 830 150A 120/208V panelboard 1 ea 1,500.00 1,500 831 Power feeders 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 19 Faithful+Gould 283 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESPD SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST 832 Eauipment wiring 833 Boiler feed,connection,&disconnect switch 3 ea 1,250.00 3,750 834 Boiler control panel feed&connection 1 ea 850.00 850 835 Pump feed,connection,&disconnect switch 16 ea 1,250.00 20,000 836 Chemical feed system control panel feed& connection 1 ea 850.00 850 837 Chiller feed,connection,&FSS 2 ea 3,500.00 7,000 838 AHU feed,connection,&FSS 2 ea 2,500.00 5,000 839 OSA feed,connection,&FSS 1 ea 2,500.00 2,500 840 Heat trace feeds&connections 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 841 DDC system feeds&connections 1 Is 5,000.00 5,000 842 AHU feed,connection,&FSS WP,connection to VFD 4 ea 4,000.00 16,000 843 OSA feed,connection,&FSS WP,connection to VFD 2 ea 4,000.00 8,000 844 Cooling tower feed,connection,&FSS WP, connection to VFD 2 ea 3,000.00 6,000 845 AHU feed,connection,&FSS WP,connection to VFD (Law Library) 1 ea 3,000.00 3,000 846 Elevator FSS,enclosed CB,feed and connection 9 ea 3,500.00 31,500 847 Elevator cab power feed,connection,&disconnect switch 9 ea 1,500.00 13,500 848 Sally port system feeds,controls,connections,& disconnect switch 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 849 Loading dock leveller feed,connection,&disconnect switch 3 ea 2,000.00 6,000 850 Trash compactor feed,connection,&disconnect switch 1 ea 2,000.00 2,000 851 Entry screening equipment feed and connection 2 ea 1,500.00 3,000 852 Mechanical equipment feeds,connections,& disconnect switches for equipment not yet specified 190,071 sf 0.40 76,028 853 SUBTOTAL $1,457,688 $54 855 D5020 LIGHTING&POWER 856 Llahtlna 857 Lighting fixtures 190,071 sf 7.00 1,330,497 858 Lighitng control 190,071 sf 0.60 114,043 859 Small power devices 860 Small power devices 190,071 sf 0.45 85,532 861 Branch circuitry 862 Branch circuitry 190,071 sf 4.00 760,284 863 SUBTOTAL $2,290,356 864 865 D5030 COMMUNICATION&SECURITY SYSTEMS 866 Fire alarm 867 Fire alarm control panel 1 ea 50,000.00 50,000 868 Fire alarm remote annunciator 1 ea 1,250.00 1,250 869 Master box 1 ea 3,200.00 3,200 870 Exterior beacon 1 ea 150.00 150 871 Knox box 1 ea 600.00 600 872 Fire alarm devices 190,071 sf 0.60 114,043 673 Fire alarm circuitry 190,071 sf 0.80 152,057 874 Testing and programming 1 Is 15,000.00 15,000 875 Telephone/CATV/Data System 876 Devices and cabling 190,071 sf 2.50 475,178 877 Rough In 190,071 sf 0.90 171,064 878 MDF fit out 1 ea 3,000.00 3,000 879 IDF fit out 8 ea 1,500.00 12,000 880 Closet backboard 9 ea 350.00 3,150 881 Communication closet grounding 9 ea 500.00 4,500 882 Public Address System 883 Public Address System 190,071 sf 1.00 190,071 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 20 Faithful+Gould 284 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESPO SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 884 AV Systems 885 Head-end equipment and devices 886 AV system rough-in 190,071 sf 1.00 190,071 887 Courtroom AV rough-in 16 ea 10,000.00 160,000 888 Jury Pool AV rough-in 1 ea 10,000.00 10,000 889 Security system 890 CCTV head-end&devices 891 Card Access head-end&devices 892 Intercom head-end&devices 893 Graphic User Interface head-end&devices 894 CCTV rough-in 190,071 sf 0.75 142,553 895 Card Access rough-in 190,071 sf 0.75 142,553 896 Intercom rough-in 190,071 sf 0.40 76,028 897 Graphic User Interface rough-in 190,071 sf 0.40 76,028 898 Specialty Systems 899 Emergency call system 900 Cell emergency call system 901 Judge emergency call/intercom system 902 SUBTOTAL $1,992,496 903 904 D5040 OTHER ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 905 Lightning protection 906 Lightning protection 190,071 sf 0.35 66,525 907 Temporary services 908 Temporary power and lights 190,071 sf 0.50 95,036 909 Reimbursables 910 Fees&permits 1 Is 50,000.00 50,000 911 SUBTOTAL 211,561 912 913 TOTAL-ELECTRICAL $5,952,101 914 915 916 E10 EQUIPMENT 917 918 E10 EQUIPMENT,GENERALLY 919 Appliances-allowance 1 Is 25,000.00 25,000 920 Cell doors 38 ea 8,000.00 304,000 921 Detention Equipment-Allowance 1 Is 200,000.00 200,000 922 Security Screening System-By Others NIC 923 SUBTOTAL $529,000 924 925 TOTAL-EQUIPMENT $529,000 926 927 928 E20 FURNISHINGS 929 930 E2010 FIXED FURNISHINGS 931 Entry mats&frames-Allowance 300 sf 50.00 15,000 932 Interior mini-blinds-Allowance 1 Is 50,000.00 50,000 933 Mecho shades/blinds-NIC 934 Library shelving-NIC 935 Compact shelving-NIC 936 Chairs-NIC 937 SUBTOTAL $65,000 938 939 E2020 MOVABLE FURNISHINGS 940 All movable furnishings to be provided and installed by owner 941 SUBTOTAL NIC 942 943 TOTAL-FURNISHINGS $65,000 944 945 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 21 Faithful+Gould 285 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESTD SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 946 F10 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 947 948 F10 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 949 No items in this section 950 SUBTOTAL $0 951 952 TOTAL-SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $0 953 954 955 F20 SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION 956 957 F2010 BUILDING ELEMENTS DEMOLITION 958 Demo back of church 9,500 sf 6.00 57,000 959 Move church to new location 1 Is 1,500,000.00 1,500,000 960 SUBTOTAL $1,557.000 961 962 F2020 HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS ABATEMENT 963 Allowance 964 SUBTOTAL $0 965 966 TOTAL-SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION $1,557,000 967 966 969 G SITE PREP/DEVELOPMENT 970 971 G10 SITE PREPARATION&DEMOLITION 972 Site Clearing 973 Allowance for site clearance-Assume clear site following demolitions by others 974 Site Demolitions and Relocations 975 Site construction fence/barricades 1,100 If 15.00 16,500 976 Relocate existing utilities w/civil utilities 977 Site Earthwork 978 Strip topsoil,store 700 cy 5.00 3,500 979 Site cuts to fills,dispose offsite 5,000 cy 18.00 90,000 980 Remove asphalt @ ramps 14,300 sf 0.50 7,150 981 Remove curbing @ ramps 1,774 sf 1.50 2,661 962 Allowance for site dewatering 1 Is 25,000.00 25,000 983 Rock cut-Not included 984 Hazardous Waste Remediation 985 Remove contaminated soils-Assume not required 986 Dispose/treat contaminated water-Assume not required 987 SUBTOTAL $144,811 988 989 G20 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 990 Roadways and Parkina Lots 991 Bituminous concrete paving 17,581 Sf - 992 excavate to reduce levels 651 cy 6.00 3,906 993 remove excavated material off site 651 cy 15.00 9,765 994 gravel base 430 cy 20.00 8,600 995 bituminous concrete 674 tns 78.00 52,572 996 Vehicular concrete pavement 2,787 sf - 997 excavate to reduce levels 155 cy 6.00 930 998 remove excavated material off site 155 cy 15.00 2,325 999 gravel base 69 cy 20.00 1,380 1000 rebar 8,361 Ibs 0.85 7,107 1001 concrete 2,787 sf 8.00 22,296 1002 Vertical granite curb,8" 767 If 30.00 23,010 1003 12"vehicular granite curb 30 If 42.00 1,260 1004 Transition granite curb 1 ea 200.00 200 1005 Road signage-Allowance 1 Is 10,000.00 10,000 1006 Wheel stops 22 ea 125.00 2,750 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 22 Faithful+Gould 286 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'O SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 1007 Pedestrian paving 1008 Granite pavers 7,969 Sf - 1009 excavate to reduce levels 295 cy 6.00 1,770 1010 remove excavated material off site 295 cy 15.00 4,425 1011 gravel base 198 cy 20.00 3,960 1012 concrete,3" 7,969 sf 3.00 23,907 1013 granite pavers 7,969 sf 35.00 278,915 1014 Concrete pavement 1,894 sf - 1015 excavate to reduce levels 70 cy 6.00 420 1016 remove excavated material off site 70 cy 15.00 1,050 1017 gravel base 47 cy 20.00 940 1018 concrete,3" 1,894 sf 3.00 5,682 1019 Site Development 1020 Concrete retaining walls 1021 Footing 1022 Formwork 1,603 sf 10.00 50,220 1023 Re-bar 2,170 Ibs 0.85 1,845 1024 Concrete material 31 cy 105.00 3,255 1025 Placing concrete 31 cy 50.00 1,550 1026 Wall-12"thick 1027 Excavation 600 cy 8.00 4,800 1028 Remove off site 600 cy 15.00 9,000 1029 Backfill with gravel 569 cy 20.00 11,380 1030 Formwork 5,022 sf 11.00 55,242 1031 Re-bar 10,044 Ibs 0.85 8,537 1032 Concrete material 98 cy 105.00 10,290 1033 Placing concrete 98 cy 50.00 4,900 1034 Facing to retaining walls,textured CMU 2,511 sf 15.00 37,665 1035 Cap to retaining wall,stone 364 If 50.00 18,200 1036 Steel picket vehicular security gate 1 ea 50,000.00 50,000 1037 6'steel picket fence 123 If 250.00 30,750 1038 Rebuild granite 1039 Site furnishings 1040 Flagpole including base 3 ea 3,000.00 9,000 1041 Bench,6'length-Allowance 5 ea 2,200.00 11,000 1042 Trash receptacles-Allowance 5 ea 1,100.00 5,500 1043 Security bollards 13 ea 2,500.00 32,500 1044 Site sign 1 ea 5,000.00 5,000 1045 Tree grates 4 ea 1,500.00 6,000 1046 Landscaping&Plantings: 1047 Deciduous shade tree 40 ea 1,800.00 72,000 1048 Deciduous accent tree 15 ea 1,400.00 21,000 1049 Evergreen tree 10 ea 1,200.00 12,000 1050 Deciduous shrub 5,364 sf 13.00 69,732 1051 Evergreen shrub 2,692 sf 20.00 53,840 1052 Groundcover 2,860 sf 5.00 14,300 1053 Lawn,seeded 17,062 sf 0.30 5,119 1054 Perennials/grasses 661 sf 5.00 3,305 1055 Purchased topsoil/loam 316 cy 30.00 9,480 1056 Irrigation system,standard 17,723 sf 1.00 17,723 1057 SUBTOTAL $1,112,303 1058 1059 G30 CIVIL MECHANICAL UTILITIES 1060 Water Service 1061 CLDI piping-10"Combination main 55 If 77.00 4,235 1062 CLDI piping-8"Fire Protection 25 If 63.00 1,575 1063 CLDI piping-4"Domestic 20 If 39.00 780 1064 Gate valve-8"(Fire Protection) 1 ea 950.00 950 1065 Gate valve-4"(Domestic) 1 ea 550.00 550 1066 Post Indicator Valve(P.I.V.) 1 ea 700.00 700 1067 Tapping sleeve w/gate valve 1 ea 2,750.00 2,750 1068 Trench support/work in street 1 Is 2,500.00 2,500 1069 Excavation&trenching 1 Is 2,500.00 2,500 1070 Testing&disinfection 1 Is 500.00 500 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 23 Faithful+Gould 287 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT EST'O SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 1071 1072 Sanitary Sewer System 1073 PVC piping-8" 80 If 20.00 1,600 1074 Connect to existing 1 ea 2,000.00 2,000 1075 Trench support/work in street 1 Is 4,000.00 4,000 1076 Excavation&trenching 1 Is 3,000.00 3,000 1077 1078 Gas Service 1079 Gas piping-by Gas Co. 1080 Excavation&backfill--allowance 100 If 15.00 1,500 1081 1082 Storm Drainage System 1083 Drainage manholes(7'-10'deep) 10 ea 2,000.00 20,000 1084 Catch basins(5'deep) 8 ea 1,500.00 12,000 1085 Outlet Control Structure 1 ea 4,000.00 4,000 1086 Water Quality Structure(Stormceptor) 1 ea 15,000.00 15,000 1087 Water Reuse Tank,25,000 gal Fiberglass 1 ea 20,000.00 20,000 1088 -Excavation,sheeting,base slab,installation& backfill 1 Is 30,000.00 30,000 1089 Trench drain 40 If 200.00 8,000 1090 Connect to existing 1 ea 2,000.00 2,000 1091 Trench support/work in street 1 Is 3,000.00 3,000 1092 Drainage Piping 1,135 If 40.00 45,400 1093 Excavation&trenching 757 cy 5.00 3,785 1094 Bedding 315 cy 21.00 6,615 1095 Backfill&compaction 442 cy 15.00 6,630 1096 1097 Subsurface Detention System 1098 Access manhole 4 ea 1,800.00 7,200 1099 36"Perf CPP 300 If 80.00 24,000 1100 -Volume of pipe per LF 0.26 cu yd 1101 -Volume of pipe-total 78.00 cu yd 1102 Geotextilre fabric,wrap stones 4,590 sf 1.00 4,590 1103 Miscellaneous costs 1 Is 1000.00 1,000 1104 Excavation 75'L X 24'W X 6'D 400 cy 5.00 2,000 1105 Crashed stone-5' 255 cy 18.00 4,590 1106 Gravel/Loam covering-1' 67 cy 22.00 1,474 1107 1108 Work @ Law Library/Church 1709 Water Service 1110 Allowance for pipe,excavation,etc 1 Is 7,500.00 7,500 1111 Sewer System 1112 Allowance for pipe,excavation,etc 1 Is 15,000.00 15,000 1113 Storm Drainage 1114 Allowance to connect to site drainage 1 Is 3,500.00 3,500 1115 SUBTOTAL 276.424 1116 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 24 Faithful+Gould 288 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA UNIT ESPD SUB TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNR COST COST TOTAL COST 1117 G40 ELECTRICAL UTILITIES 111s Electrical distribution 1119 Manhole 1 ea 6500.00 6500 1120 Primary electrical service ductbank,empty conduit, allow 500 If 65.00 32500 1121 Primary conductors National Grid 1122 Switch 1 ea National Grid 1123 2000KVA transformer 2 ea National Grid 1124 Transformer pad 2 ea 2000.00 4000 1125 Secondary electrical service ductbank(2-3000A feeders) 100 If 1225.00 122500 1126 Site liahtina 1127 Site lighting and circuitry,allow 1 Is 70000.00 70000 1126 Site communications and security 1129 Communication service ductbank(empty conduit), allow 150 If 75.00 11250 1130 CCTV cabling Verizon 1131 Manhole 1 ea 6500.00 6500 1132 SUBTOTAL $253,250 1133 1134 G90 OTHER SITE CONSTRUCTION 1135 No items in this section 1136 SUBTOTAL $0 1137 1136 TOTAL-SITE DEVELOPMENT $1,786,788 1139 1140 1141 TOTAL DIRECT COST Trade Costs $54,490,670 1142 1143 MARK UP 1144 1145 GENERAL COND./PERMIT/INS. 1146 General Conditions 10.50% 54,490,670 5,721,520 1147 Insurance&bond-Included above 0.00% 60,212,190 - 1146 Permit-Included above 0.00% 60,212,190 1749 SUBTOTAL 5,721,520 1150 1151 FEE 1152 Overhead&profit 3.00% 60,212,190 1,806,366 1153 SUBTOTAL 1,806,366 1154 1155 TOTAL-MARK UP $7,527,886 1156 1157 1156 CONTINGENCIES/ESCALATION 1159 1160 DESIGN&PRICING 1161 Pricing/estimating contingency(reduces to 0%at Construction Documents)based on Trade Costs 10.00% 54,490,670 5,449,067 1162 Design contingency(reduces to 0%at Construction Documents)based on Trade Costs 10.00% 54,490,670 5,449,067 1163 SUBTOTAL $10,898,134 1164 1165 ESCALATION 1166 Price escalation to mid-point of construction due to increases in labor and material costs(Included per owner) 10.00% 65,388,804 6,538,880 1167 SUBTOTAL 6,538,880 1168 1169 GMP/CM CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 1170 GMP/CM Contingency 3.00% 71,927,684 2,157,831 1171 SUBTOTAL $2,157,831 1172 1173 TOTAL-CONTINGENCIES/ESCALATION $19 594 845 Salem Trial Court So 3.20.07 Page 25 Faithful+Gould 289 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center March 22,2007 Federal Street,Salem,MA Study Cost Estimate 190,071 GFA ALTERNATES (ind Markups) DESCRIPTION TOTAL CMU w/furred gwb to interior of exterior wall in lieu of LGMF w/gwb cladding interior 1 and"dens-glass"sheathing $1,095,900 Zinc coated copper standing seam in lieu of anodized aluminum roof panels on vertical 2 walls. $156,800 3a Building integrated photovoltaic sunshade in lieu of aluminum sunshade. $288,500 3b C/S operating sunshades in lieu of aluminum sunshade. $192,300 4 Substitute Tuff-hide wall coating for veneer plaster. ($96,500) 5 Raised floor system with carpet tiles at all raised floor locations.(34,311 sf) $1,783,500 6 Thin set terrazzo and integral base in lieu of paver tile. $15,300 7 Provide stainless steel toilet partitions in lieu of solid phenolic. $61,800 8 MRL units in lieu of electric traction elevators. $133,700 9 Paver/ballast pattern at interior courtyard in lieu of 3-ply modified bitumen roof. $26,700 10 Substitute shrubs/groundcover for lawn. $119,100 11 Substitute state-of-art water saving irrigation fixtures in lieu of regular. $39,500 12 4"granite in lieu of 1 1/2"at exterior. $361,000 13 Provide sustainable rainwater collection system. $219,800 14 Delete wood wainscot in judges offices&court conf.rooms and leave a chair rail only. ($488,500) Early construction package including church demo, site prep&demo,church fdn.Walls 15 &slab $819,800 Project escalated to midpoint of construction wth 18 months of design in lieu of 12 16 months. $5,839,286 17 Substitute corian for granite vanity counters. $0 Salem Trial Court SD 3.20.07 Page 26 Faithful+Gould 290 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs 9.2 Life Cycle, Operations, Maintenance, and Renewal Costs PAGE 293 291 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs 292 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs The following worksheet has been developed to estimate the anticipated operating costs for the new Trial Court Facility in Salem. The estimated maintenance costs are derived from industry standards developed by the International Facility Management Association.The maintenance costs are a combination of several different categories of costs.The estimates reflect only maintenance costs,not the capitalized cost of improvements.These costs include all repair, preventative,materials,direct labor and contract costs.Administration expenses are associated with an O&M Supervisor and a CAMIS Operator.Tradespeople are estimated under the other categories. These costs will be reviewed and refined as the design progresses. Estimated O&M Budget requirements for Salem Courthouse sq fit Process treatment& External Roads and environmental Building Interior Systems Grounds stystems Custodial Administration Utilities Total Cost per sq ft $ 0.20 $ 1.14 $ 0.18 $ 0.06 $ 1.07 1$ 0.60 $ 2.88 $ 6.13 175,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 199,500.00 $ 31,500.00 $ 10,500.00 $ 187,250.00 $ 105,000.00 $ 504,000.00 $ 1,0723750.00 IFMA Maintenance Categories (Not all apply to Salem) TPC $106,000,000 O/M%TPC 1 External building maintenance Roof Skin(siding,masonry,sash,glazing,window washing,external doors) Exterior signage Caulking of expansion joints Interior systems maintenance Electrical systems(primary and secondary systems,emergency electrical systems,UPS,lighting systems,egress signage, fire/life safety systems and alarms and remote monitoring,elevator maintenance/repair) Mechanical systems(HVAC,chillers,boilers,plumbing,extinguishing systems,backflow prevention,refrigeration and non process related pumps) Base building general maintenance(interior walls,doors,ceilings,partitions and interior finishes,pest control) Interior signage Administrative support staff Roads&Grounds maintenance Roadways,sidewalks,parking lots (paving repairs,sealing,striping,parking,roadway lighting,power washing)snow removal,de-icing Landscaping(planting,mowing,ittigation,plant/tree replacement) Parking structures(surface repairs,sealing,striping,lighting and drainage systems) Storm sewers(catch basins,manholes,sub-surface drainage systems) Process treatment and environmental systems Process cooling water system Process gas systems Air discharge scrubbers Waste water systems Water treatment Solid waste management system Custodial wages,staff support,supervision,administration,supplies and non-capital equipment(e.g.,brooms,floor polishers) Administration O&M Supervisor Camis Operator 293 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 9 Project Costs 9.3 Cost Considerations for Final Design Items to reduce construction cost: A After more geotechnical investigation,analyze to determine the most cost effective foundation system. B Consider using Tuff-Hide Primer-Surfacer in lieu of veneer plaster wall finish. Items that will increase construction cost but add flexibility for future: A Consider installing a low profile raised floor system at all transaction areas (about 34,300 SF). B Use carpet tiles in lieu of carpet in conjunction with the raised floor system (about 34,300 SF). Items that will increase construction cost but will reduce operating cost: A Replace fixed exterior shading devices with automatically controlled operable sunshades to provide optimum solar shading while reducing heat gain. B Replace fixed exterior shading devices with a building integrated photovoltaic sunshade that generates solar power while providing optimal solar shading. C HVAC: See Section 3.16 Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures,HVAC items 1 through 10. D Lighting Systems: See Section 3.16 Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures, Lighting Systems,items 1 through 3. E Renewable Energy:See Section 3.16 Salem Courthouse Energy Conservation Measures,Renewable Energy,items 1 through 3. Other functional Items: A Lower detainee elevator to a sub-basement level and construct a detainee passageway to the exterior wall of the building for future connection to the PFC. B Build in structural supports and a knockout panel for a future pedestrian bridge connecting to the PFC. 294 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan 10.1 Introduction The implementation plan has three main pieces:Site acquisition and preparation;the disposition of the Superior Court building and the County Commissioner's building and the construction of the new Trial Court Building.Due to budget constraints,the planned renovation of the existing Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building will be certified as its own study pending funding and will not be considered as part of this project. This section outlines work to be done for Site Acquisition,renovation of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building in the future,and the construction of the new J. Michael Ruane Judicial Center. 10.2 Site Acquisition and Site Preparation Assembling the site requires the acquisition of several properties,both municipal and privately owned.One parcel(containing an existing cloverleaf ramp between North and Bridge Streets)will be gifted to the State by the City of Salem.The other remaining parcels-58,60 and 62 Federal Street and the First Baptist Church of Salem—will be purchased by the State.Steps and current status are as follows: A DCAM to acquire the North Street ramp parcel from the City of Salem as a gift. Status:in progress.City Council voted unanimously to gift this parcel to the Commonwealth and land transfer is underway. • Redesign the Federal Street/North Street intersection. Status:in progress.Currently at 25%design,MassHighway has given the go-ahead for 75%design and is in the process of scheduling a public hearing to present changes to the existing North Street Improvement project. • Add reconfiguration of intersection to Mass Highway Department's North Street Project.This will happen contractually as part of the 75%design. • Demolish existing ramp.Abandon existing curb cuts. • Relocate Utilities within the ramp area. 295 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan B DCAM to acquire three houses on Federal Street(58,60&62) Status:all houses acquired as of February 2007. Houses to be relocated off site or demolished. Status:DCAM currently investigating offering houses to public to be moved.RFP for this process is in development. House foundations to be removed and filled. (Further details to be contained in RFP or determined by CM). C DCAM to acquire First Baptist Church Property(56 Federal Street) Status:negotiations in final stages. • Perform an existing condition survey and make measured drawings. • Conduct sub-surface soil investigation as necessary for building foundations. • Perform Haz/Mat survey;abatement as necessary. Demolish rear addition including foundations. • Construct new Church foundations in new location. • Move church onto new foundations. 10.3 Disposition of the Superior Court Building and the County Commissioner's Building The disposition of the Superior Court and County Commissioner's Building will take place under a separate process by DCAM's Office of Real Estate.Planning for this process is already underway. The boiler room under the Administrative Addition to the Probate and Family Court/ Registry of Deeds building supplies steam via a utility tunnel to heat the Superior Court building and the County Commissioners'building.DCAM has made a commitment to MassHistoric to warm-mothballing the buildings prior to disposition to protect against building deterioration;therefore,the connection between the buildings will not be severed until the disposition process is complete.During a renovation of the boiler room in the Probate and Family Court building,it would be possible to continue to supply steam from one of the three existing boilers.A temporary boiler could be located on the new lot to serve these buildings after disposition so that the steam line could be disconnected and the remaining boiler can be upgraded. The primary time limit for disposing of the Superior Court building and the County Commissioner's building relates to the cost of keeping them heated.While it is desirable to replace the boiler serving them when the mechanical work is being performed under the main construction contract,it would be possible to keep one existing boiler on line until two of the existing boilers were replaced and operational.The two operational boilers could feed the Superior Court building and County Commissioner's building while the third existing boiler was being replaced.There is also the option of having a temporary boiler 296 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan installed outside on the Superior Court building site to serve the two buildings.This option is to be considered unlikely. 10.4 Construction of the J. Michael Ruane Judicial Center Construction will start after site acquisition is complete and a Construction Manager is under contract.The Construction Manager selection process in underway and a contract will be awarded by July 2007. 10.5 Schedule Producing the design and construction documents for the proposed Trial Court Building will take 12 months,bidding and award of the construction contract another 2.5 months, for a total of 14.5 months. (Some of the tasks can be done as early packages with the Construction Management team.)This allows a period of 14.5 months to accomplish the following activities so that construction of the new Trial Court building can proceed: A Removal from the site of the houses. B Removal of the house foundations. C Demolition/Removal of the cloverleaf ramp. D Relocation of the utilities in the ramp vicinity. E Existing condition survey and haz/mat survey of the church F Construction of new foundations for the church in its new location. G Demolition of the rear addition on the church including removal of the foundations. H Moving the church onto the new foundations. I Clearing the remainder of the site in preparation for construction of the proposed new Trial Court building. 10.6 Renovation of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds Building The original intent of DCAM/AOTC was to fully renovate the Probate and Family Court/ Registry of Deeds building(PFC)for the sole use of the Probate and Family Court.That plan requires the building to be vacated,the Registry of Deeds to be permanently relocated, and all other occupants to be temporarily relocated for the duration of construction. Due to steep escalation costs,it became apparent that the project budget of$106 million would not be adequate for both the proposed new Trial Court building and the PFC. Initially,Goody Clancy was asked to undertake studies to determine what levels of partial renovation could be accomplished with reduced budgets. See Salem Additional Service Alternate Plan B Draft Study, Task 9—Identij�Possible Levels of Partial Renovation of the PFC,November 21,2006,Appendix A2.5.Even after reducing the scope of renovation, the funding would not permit work on both buildings.DCAM decided to proceed with new construction only and plans to continue with the full renovation of the PFC when funds are authorized in the future. 297 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan Although the full renovation of the Probate and Family Court/Registry of Deeds building for the sole use of the Probate and Family Court is now not part of this project,the Trial Court facility will be designed to accommodate this renovation in the future. OVERVIEW The Probate and Family Court building consists of the original 1912 building with a 1979- 81 addition,referred to as the Administrative Addition.The original building has three levels,a lower level that opens onto Bridge Street,the first floor that opens onto Federal Street,a second floor and an attic.The first and second floors have a floor-to-floor height of about 21'-6". The Administrative Addition has four levels above grade,with the first and third levels matching the floor elevations of the first and second floors of the PFC.Because of the 21'-6" floor to floor height within the PFC the Administrative Addition was able to insert level 2 between the first and second floor of the PFC and level 3 between the second floor and attic of the PFC.The ground floor of the Administrative Addition is open and accommodates parking for staff and judges. The entry lobby on the first floor,the lower level lobby and the second floor lobby,the connecting monumental stair and the wrought iron elevator cage,the two public east west corridors and the session one courtroom will be restored and preserved.Goody Clancy's preliminary study recommends that the remaining portions of the building including the Administrative Addition undergo a gut rehab with the installation of all new mechanical and electrical systems. See the Existing Conditions Report attached in the Appendix(Salem Probate and Family Court Existing Conditions Report,Draft dated 9.26.05/Revised 11.11.05, Goody Clancy). Studies indicate that the building will comfortably accommodate the program consisting of five courtrooms,transaction space for The Register of Probate and Probation and supplemental operations.At the time the studies for the PFC were done,it was proposed that the existing heating plant could become a central plant serving the Probate and Family Court building and the proposed new Trial Court building.It was also proposed that a central cooling plant for both facilities could be located in the PFC.The plans were developed under this assumption. THE PREFERRED SCHEME The preferred scheme is shown in figures 10A-10G and described below.Options for layouts for Probation in the Lower Level and Registry of Probate on the First Floor were studied and discussed below.Figures 10H through 10L show the earlier scheme with options,from which the preferred scheme was selected and developed. 298 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan LOWER LEVEL(15,120 NSF)(see Figure 10A)The lower level accommodates Probation(6,450 GSF)along with public toilet rooms and mechanical and electrical rooms.Staff parking for 7 vehicles is located under the Administrative Addition.There are three options for laying out Probation. All options have the waiting and transaction counter directly off the lower level lobby. Option P1 (the preferred option)locates the clerks,active files and administrative offices behind the transaction counter in the west wing.Dispute Intervention offices are located in the main body of the building and Probation Officers are located in the east wing(see Figure 10H). Option P2 locates clerks and active files directly behind the transaction counter in the north wing.Administrative offices are located the west wing and Probation Officers along with Dispute Intervention offices are located in the east wing(see Figure 10I). Option P3 locates the clerks and active files directly behind the transaction counter in the west wing along with some Probation Officers and some administrative offices. Administrative offices are located in the north wing. Dispute Intervention offices and the remaining Probation Officers are located in the east wing(see Figure 10J). FIRST FLOOR(21,533 NSF)(see Figure 10B)The first floor will accommodate the Register of Probate(13,704 NSF).The preferred plan locates the public waiting area and transaction counter directly off the main public lobby.Active files are located immediately behind the transaction counter in the large main room,currently the Registry of Deeds file room.Clerks and Administrative offices are located behind the main file room in the Administrative Addition.Additional active files are located in the east wind along with a public conference room.A public research area is located directly adjacent to the public waiting room.A Family Law center and an office for the Department of Revenue are located in the west wing. Two additional layout options were developed,Option T-1 and T-2.Both options have the public waiting area directly off the main public lobby with the transaction counter,the research room and the public conference room directly adjacent to the public waiting area. Both options utilize the west wing for a Hearing Room and Family Information Center. Both options locate clerks and active files in the large main room formerly occupied by the Registry of Deeds and the Administrative Addition and more active files in the east wing. The difference between the two options is that Option T-1 locates offices for the Register, Administrative Deputy Register, 1st Assistant Register,and Assistant Registers in the 299 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan Administrative Addition,where Option T-2 locates these office in the large main room, closer to the transaction counter,opposite some of the clerks and active files(see figures 10K and 101,2). SECOND FLOOR(21,533 NSF)(see Figure 10D)The original Session One courtroom in the west wing will be refurbished and three new courtrooms will be constructed in the main large room formerly occupied by the Register of Probate with a fourth courtroom constructed in the Administrative Addition.All five courtrooms share secure staff circulation and public circulation.Given the minimal need for people in custody in the Probate and Family Court,it was agreed that not all courtrooms needed to provide for detainees.Therefore,two courtrooms share a common detainee holding area.A hearing room and a public conference room are located in the east wing off public circulation. Social Services and the Court Clinic are located in the Administrative Addition off public circulation. FIRST FLOOR MEZZANINE(6,413 NSF)(see Figure 10C)This second floor of the Administrative Addition functions as a mezzanine between the first and second floors of the original building.It comfortably accommodates five judges'chambers with associated staff and conference rooms. SECOND FLOOR MEZZANINE(6,413 NSF)(see Figure 10E)This third floor of the Administrative Addition is proposed to be converted to a roof top mechanical area for cooling towers and emergency generator,by removing the roof above,but keeping the exterior walls to shield the mechanical equipment from view.The preferred option shows the fifth courtroom,located on the floor below,extending up though the roof top mechanical area for increased height of the courtroom.As a cost-saving measure,an option which does not extend the courtroom through the floor above would save money in structural framing and simplify the layout of roof top mechanical equipment. DETAINEE CIRCULATION:A detainee/staffelevator serving one courtroom set on the 2nd floor may originate at the lower level or may originate one level below the lower level,to open to an underground tunnel connecting to the detainee area in the new Trial Court building. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS:(see Figure 10F)The preferred scheme for the lower level of the PFC has a large mechanical room to accommodate chillers for a central cooling plant. There is an option to move this mechanical room to the space currently occupied by parking for staff and judges under the Administrative Addition.Secure parking for the judges could be located in the parking area located on the east side of the building.This would allow room for expansion of Probation.In the current preferred scheme Probation is a tight fit. 300 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan Three approaches to providing heating and cooling to the Probate and Family Court building and the proposed new Trial Court building were studied: 1.A central mechanical plant in the PFC;2.A central mechanical plant in the proposed new Trial Court building; and 3.Two separate independent mechanical plants,one in the PFC and on in the proposed new Trial Court building.The benefits and drawbacks of these options are outlined as follows: A Central Mechanical Plant in PFC PROS • Reuse of existing boiler plant space and chimney • Available space exists for one central chiller plant • Consolidated location for improved maintenance,efficiency and operation • Cooling towers all on existing PFC Addition building roof Helps balance electrical loads • Lower first cost CONS • Some phasing required to keep temporary steam system for Superior Court and County Commissioner's Building B Central Mechanical Plant in New Trial Court Building—Cost Premium of about $427,000 PROS • Consolidated location for improved maintenance,efficiency and operation. • Existing steam plant serves only the Superior Court/County Commissioner's building. Plant can be easily configured within a new space. CONS • PFC cannot become operational until new Trial Court building is complete. • Additional new square footage required. • Unused existing boiler plant. • Cooling towers on roof of new building. • New chimney required for new boiler plant. More expensive than location in Probate and Family Court building. • Unbalanced electrical service between new and Probate and Family Court buildings. C Two separate independent Mechanical Plants,one in Probate and Family Court&one in new Trial Court Building—Cost Premium of about$565,000 PROS • Smaller equipment—sized for each building configuration. • Flexibility for buildings coming on line at different times. 301 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan CONS • Largest square footage requirement. Highest first cost. • Highest maintenance and operational cost. • Largest installed equipment capacity. Duplication required of some large equipment including all ancillary equipment. • Dual cooling tower configurations for increased maintenance. • Cost premium for construction of mechanical space and duplicate mechanical equipment. For the complete Probate and Family Court mechanical and electrical systems description see Salem Trial Courts Mechanical and Electrical Systems Analysis,SEi Companies,Appendix A1.2.For an analysis of MEP options for minimal renovation to the PFC see Salem Courts, MEP HVAC Options for Minimal Renovation to PFC,dated September 27,2006,Appendix A2.7. 302 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10A o ° o 0 0 u ` ALT MECH 't 0 e MECHANICAL ------------- €l n MEC WIICAL ALT.STAFF (120 my DI PARKING [120 p {120 (101aF} p 120 S T L i sA 8001 &aFAI( ---, F— T--T--, FQ I — ---T— I C (124s1 i132sf� — 15 15 14 19 12 c l c I c l c l wAmNc I CHIEF PILE U U L _J L--�--�--�--J CHIEF� o r--,�--,�--rn--r-o--r 5T AS ` GT CHIEF 1 1 2 1 0 4 5 I {ISosf sua�� f'� {:�° �r C ❑ L--n---J3---JD--JAL---J S-AF'CON=. _ CHIEF {300 sfl ' B T T I B T 9 1 10 T 11 I mod Assl Chief Ass C•of (I5D o .� ,. 0 U U U U D U PROBATION Scale=1!20 v 10 20 30 as l�7 n •RCXITlCTXRE DCANI ooDYq P E8........ RYATIOX TRG9915T2 One AShhuftn Place V C�vCY PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN Boron 0ST2chuaeris 33`0c,Mao51iw` Salem Famil &Probate Courts �°°a""�P�E""°' 0°00 6nslnn,Massarh�sells 021153866 Y FILE wwE. Pk Planhl.&g 617.2E2.2760 fax617262.9512 36 Federal Street ardl�g�odyclancp.rxen naxvm� p+C c DAM,eYv,.gowyd cy— Salem, Massachusetts JMT JEG 03-17-2006 303 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10B 1ST ADM IN ASST. ASST. ASST. ASSTF—S DEPUTY REG. REG. REG. REG � S I REGISTER L —F —F T J L T T ITL J L T J HAA IL C C I C I C J I ILL C I C I C I C J I C I C J r— —+—+—+— —+—+—+— �—+— S I C C I C I C C I C C I C I C I C L_J 0 ADOPT L_❑J__J__J__� L_J__J__ffL_J L_J__J ❑ BREAK T T STAFF CONF. LZ 7731 I I I r—T—T—T-1 a 71 CI l I B I CASH REST' I REG. C D.V. R.O. 0 I RESEARCH ——-I C I 0 o El FAMILY LAWCTR DOR C ON d tQ FAM INFO CTR SECURITY BIT C PARKI Scale=1:20 o 10 20 30 40 Ancxrr�erue■ DCAM GOODY PN VATIOX One Ashburton Place /v'rLt♦11wVr PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN TORC99,Massachusetls TRC9910ST2 334 Boylston Street Salem Family&Probate Courts GOODY CIANCY PROJECT NO.: 6290.00 Boston,Massachusetts 02116-3866 Y FILE NAME: pfc-plan0l.dwg 617.262.2760 fax617.262.9512 36 Federal Street arch@goodydancy.com DRAWN: CHECKED: DATE: www.goodydancy.com Salem, Massachusetts JMT I JEG 03-17-2006 304 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10C JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE T T JUDGE JUDGE T T T p S I S �I r C S S S C C P I I r�I I I 1�I I I I I I R CONF. ° RECEPTION EQUIP. a o o - - o o Q 0 0 o a o 0 0 Scale=1:20 o 10 20 30 40 ARCHITECTURE DCAM PLAHHIHO One Ashburton Place OO sR!7"TIOH Boston,Massachusetts CraivcY PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR MEZZ.PLAN TRC9910ST2 334 Boylston Street Salem Family&Probate Courts GOODY CLANCY PROJECT NO: 6290.00 Boston,Massachusetts 02116-3866 Y dwg 617.262.2760 fax617.262.9512 DMWN:NAME: pfc-plan01m.ATE arch@goodyclancy.com 36 Federal Street DRAWN: CHECI00: OATS: www.goodydancy.com Salem, Massachusetts JMT JEG 03-17-2006 305 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10D FF,BENCHX f CMF COURTR00A1 SOCIALtCCOURT CQYF. r—nl 1`1777 J— COIF. .'.QURTROOIV CONF C ETA NEE WAITING CC.R-HCC61 as COURTROOM a CflHF a,p �F BENC- IC J CONF u I6: JU7GE5 T CONF M CONE. COURTROOM VJN(COR USE} LL NEARING ROOM ------❑ u { I I f r.F. RM�) CCNF. - WAKING LJ u U P ALICCCNF.R00N SCale=1:20 ° o xo 34 a° CICAM One O GOODY .`.""R�.o� A One shhursa Place CLAI�fCY PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN �910ST2chusetts 334Bovls:onSkeet nnooraucvanc FCTwa• Bmw Boer,Ma5sachumlls021153M Salem Family&Probate Courts FILEN4fE: pfc planOz.adg 117.262.2760 tax617.262.9512 36 Federal Street amVFodyda-y— dpAvm• M7@ apdancy— Salem, Massachusetts JNAT JEG o3 „�.� 17-2006 306 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10E \ EXTERIOR WALL BELOW F4 ---- _ COURTRO BELOW NEW ROOFATSECOND NEW ROOF AT SE FLOOR MEZZANINE LEVEL FLOOR MEZZANINE F 7 �x1 x ------------------------- I I I I I O I I I I s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ATTIC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GLASS LITE IN I ATTIC FLOOR I I I I I I MEMBRANE ROOF l ® i MEMBRANE ROOF I I SLOPE j up I \ SLOPE I IT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IL--------------------j I I I Scale=1:20 o io 20 30 40 AR°RITR°TUR■ DCAM GooDY'LARRIR° One Ashburton Place CA[v—tCy"T'°" PROPOSED ATTIC P LAN Boston,Massachusetts TRC9910ST2 334 Boylston Street Salem Family&Probate Courts GOODY CLNCYPRGJECTNO.: 6290.00 Boston,Massachusetts 02116-3866 Y 617.262.2760 fax617.262.9512 36 Federal Street DMWN:LE rE: Pfo-at---]g arch@goodyclancy.com DRnwN: cNECKED: DATE www.goodydancy.com Salem, Massachusetts JMT JEG 03-17-2006 307 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 1OF / _ \J NEW ROO FAT SECOND / MEMB OOF FLOOR MEZZANINE LEVEL NEW ROOF AT SE FLOOR MEZZANINE EL MEMBRANE ROOF \ F—I L-x-j amEr O amen amn antEr YEMBP.Wf ROOF �Af]IRUNE ROOF ®➢W OR4N Nf10W Scale=1:20 o io 20 30 40 MCNIT!°TUR! DCAM GOODYPL"RRIR ° One Ashburton Place CLANC""`"°"T'°" PROPOSED ROOF PLAN Boston,Massachusetts Y TRC9910ST2 334 Boylston Street Salem Family&Probate Courts GOODYCUWCY PROJECT NO.: 6290.00 Boston,Massachusetts 02116-3866 Y 617.262.2760 fax 617.262.9512 DRAWN:FILE NAME: CHECKEpfc-roD arch@goodydancy.com 36 Federal Street DRAWN: CHECKED: GATE: www.goodyclancy.com Salem, Massachusetts JMT JEG 03-17-2006 308 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan ii 83� �3333a�� FIGURE 10G of�3 � FI — � m ❑ i -—:7 -L-4 C y - ��i m / ) s T" C � / � C U U E CD— u a2 CU — � o LA t i --1 I I . � nM 1� 309 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 1j Goody Clancy AR� 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10H O O O O STAFF O 0 PARKING 7 0 r 4 0 -------------------------------------------- P1'.'H1' 0 11F[1WJrAt O ----------------------- ----------------------- JI o u � ('20 u) � 4F[NNWcx a p2o.q a a ) a 1120 sl (•20 u) LEI, 5 I p (1]1 it) (126 s!) ('76 Y)(126 Y) '20.Q ('49 Y) [ [ C C FRu�p. ran(160 s1) tat A„C PROBATION (120 Y) (120 s1 "l Cner ) (12C.1) (120�')(120 Y) (120 s') 163 fl ow.1) G SaVr 00000 Stoll Cowl. (97 af) Cn et (.100 Y) (2:0 d) I A.l1 Cwlel C I (120,1)1(120,11 (150 0) ll2o 11) (1"s' (IN Y (120 f(141 sr) 0000000 7 ..... Salem Family&Probate Courts GOODY "".;":r"„ 36 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN L Street CLANCY IA 311BgylStcwSVicet OPTION P-1 Boson.Massxhnehs 02I i6-3%6 OCA6I 617 262.2760 W617262.9512 On@/tibAn PIM X&49_adydancy co' o �� Boom,A% —.ood mm —.wr.""•. 1Rf9910512 9 vu�7 .w ..;�— �f•M 310 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 101 O O O O STAFF U 0 0 PPm l!l J iI 2 0 6 5 4 0 F ----------------------------------------- 1 A e�strtr naa,.�., o � � uecRua;x � I I , 1,.YHq)a'AI -- - (N G DI 01 P fl CtW P Is1 Ass1 ('27 it) r 011 eQ (1s2 sr (126 sp 1,26 ep (126.f) Pw.1) S ftA P 1-P"I v PLP 1 n ' PROBATI N D )I pm.q (12C,I) Iq0�1) (2o y) 10o a1) S �ooc. P Cn at As,t ssl CnH 51.11 Cc,l 100 21) Chgl P QQQQQ� P V P P P T 121 aq (•20 a) (120' (1210 51) (.217 r) ..�.r..«�., Salem Family&Probate Courts GOODY.,.?(�;,,,, 36Fe*wSUN[ CLANG PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN S*M,VA 39A BOMt cn Slreel OPTION P-2 Bos.m.Massachxetts 02116-3866 DCAAI 617 262.2760 fax 617 2619512 one AshD.,rton Ptace WCh@gcodydWq Corn Boson,MA w w.goodyclancy com "� �� o.wr TRC9910ST2 311 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10J O O O O STAFF O a PARKNG J 0 01 6 L 0 — -------------------------------------------- e.^•ru nm,.tv III D U � UfCNUa:u F—j '! CM'el Id'f:M�l9I'A tst+tss! Asxt 01 I P S W Cl 01 Di P 4,1 CMI (,2P�) t c I11 j (13 2:r, (u6 xq pze,q nz6.q Os0�+) waa P Egmp _---- --'--- 100>f C 0 0 o v PROBATION ,120�} P an,1 1 2r,er} Ioo d P�, D ovoaco Stdl Cont. P (!ql TAS13510CMkl PPPv 1zo.1) (12 ) 20 s1) (120 d (120 V) -noo 1--� l I •�•�•�°^ Salem Family&Probate Courts Go�pY „ PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN sele.w C Shd LANCY 734 Boostort Sveel OPTION P-3 Bourn.Massacftisetts 0211E-7866 DCAM 617 262.2760 fax 617 262.9512 _ One Asl Place arch@goodyclancy cam o Bosloi.W nwsv 9o:Qyclawi om -- - , TRC59105T2 312 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10K 'sl Adlin Ant. sC AW. Asst. (150) (1155c,s1 1 s1(o sl( 0 st1 5 S Regsle• _ a )� C C C C C C C C .. 0 0 0 ren naa run i .. �'rw,i rvw—__.__—_—_—.—._-- _ I F ( EA -- 1TI ICI C ............. C i C --------------------- Cosh Apl I r I Ms«�nq Room 0 .. ;fib el) Raw,& Lenl rli ss(I,O0.sn � Y 0 0 o Cr 'omry Cent« 4 3Q-0__0-. --0-__0. Q - + - ^°�^°� °° Salem Family3 Probate Courts GOODY CY ;,,o„ PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN S>�s CLANCY 334BdytstonSOeel OPTION T-1 Boston,MaAsxWseos 02116-3866 DCAM 617.262.2760 fax 617.262.9512 _ One tenon ROM aO&WdYdancy cam Boston.MA •' '9Y TRC9910ST2 x 313 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan FIGURE 10L jS ._..__ C C 5 n C ` : o c.. Stolz fnnl .-.. 0 C [ .. t. Fibf SIS fl} I I I U r 0 0 C 0 u rm noor nror_ �rxr�icw rrr _—.—_—_—_—.—.--� 4 ® Ant Req. -�----�l---•---�� I 1� '20 UJ ran�(I,eB] Aw Req ('20 e (2 Req. F� '0 ft; i I S Register (2(Al ft) C C I ' ! C C Y-t--�--j L C 150 sl) t t coo C req Affl �7 rlw inq Room (ri511 fQ 2cec:rcr .. Cnn1 - Files(3,0Uf il) II " - roCfnt«to SKJptr - . —(120.a1) —o 0__ ..0...{{O 01 •,<.',«,�nf Salem Family i Probate Courts � Shd �eCy""" , PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 36 M 334BaytslonS"M OPTION T-2 Boston.Messadusetts 02116.3866 pCAM 617.262.2760 laf 617262,9512 One AftAw Roca amhAgoalyda-y.Cam 609M.MA wxw.900rlyda1g=M " oom TRC99Wn 314 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan 10.7 Procurement Method The construction of this project will be performed utilizing a construction management at-risk(CMAR,sometimes referred to as CM/GC)contract(in accordance with Chapter 193 of the Acts of 2004 and the MGL Chapter 149A),wherein the construction manager (CM)provides consulting and estimating services during the design phase of the project, and then acts as the general contractor(GC)during the construction phase,holding trade contracts and providing both management and construction services.The CM will be brought on board before the design phase begins,in this case,July 2007.The Designer will work closely with the CM,who will play a major role in the cost estimating,scheduling, value engineering,and constructability analyses throughout the design phase of the project. 10.8 Preliminary Project Schedule PAGE 317-323 315 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan 316 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan r 0 o Q o or o r r 9 0 0 0 9 9 r 4 0 - o LL c'1 N N O N O N r N 01 m — O' — R — M N O O O ° • l0 a °- 07 > j 001 O O) J ❑ • ❑ z • • Q Q 2 Q Q U O O O r r 9 9 0 0 0 9 9 or o o ro r o 0 o ro ro - - r 0 0 0 <o v o 0 o 0 cc 0 0 N N N N N N N O CO N O O O — O U G T r r r O o - o o M 0 L 9 N N Q iL C LL > CO COcc co t0 _ cD w Oo r r r U — O o Oo O — O O — O Q N N N N N r O N CO N N Q U U U U (J -0 .. ¢ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ LL r r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - o - Y L O) - N M N 00 M N N � �O O O 0 - — — N Q (6 C j U Co a • Cu 0" o" cc j m O) U U U CO 00 w iL O a • • Q a ¢ Q [A O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r LE m CO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 q q o o q o 0 4 4 - o 65 N N N N CD N N N O >+ M N 4 O p O — — N O a CO cC N N c0 lC CO CO `0. N w C 7 7 N U U l0 O W ¢ 2 , ¢ ¢ U O O N M }§m O Ln a - - O o O o O O O o O O o - c`p Oi v ch H LL CO0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N — O O O 0 0 O O O O O O — — 0 0 — — Cu p_ O O E N °U Q U O)C O C,I'm O w O c0 l0 N V l0 a0 O O C O 7 lC) N N N N N N N O D O c0 O t O O OD O 0 0 N V 0 W O O C O 7 N N N N N 1--. N N N CO O �.• ¢ 90 N Y 2t Q Q � 2 ° C v rn ❑ rn �: U U E o C d c a a c O • C U LL o 2 2 CO 2 c° d m 3 A. S d v S 2 ro c ¢ 2 d 16 N C C N N c@ U N C ) O C O'° O O 0) Oq.O ❑ C O CL O. G N CO 0) O. CT N 0) 4 01 a �j C C 0) K a � N W' Q'U N 0) w = � Fi '0) O Q' C'a. O of C C 2 � Cr L LL 2 N C OU C Z Uy � d yE 0 w =: a 18o O 3 C O � CD 0 ° ° N— C N 10 N 01 N Q N N > U LL �t5 Zz y wa N °' W a) N Q °) Uo Qca to Uc ¢a U ¢y U U� ¢ y ¢ Q v Q 2.. U U+' 2 0 UO 2 U= 2 S D U.- U°. N W O a a a a s LL �� ❑ m� �U ❑� ❑w o ❑m ❑ m m rn U Cc o � C O N y • U 3 m o O O O O O O o o O O o O (� r O N V 0 cD r 00 W O N M 00 00 i•y 0 O O O O O O O O O QI Y O O O O O O O O O O O O N N Q d '� - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ U. LL U V o 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 yw ui U � g U Cd > Cd a � U 317 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan 00 c - o o - o 0 0 9 o 9 o o - r o 0 0 0 4 4 N � M 8 N LL O - O P7 O O (`� CO (7 N O O N In ' Oi C C A 3 O_ Co O U = N l0 . . t6 p_ `p_ • l0 CO 10 J J J J Q Q Q Z Q Q O O - O O O I O O O O O p - - O O 0 0 0 r0 .@.. O - O (O p� 7 N (MNNa n o m (o aoi >o m m m a m m m m J aAD(o (O U @ O - - O Q O ❑ N Q ❑ - o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - o 0 0 - o 0 o n o ro Y N c) 6 V O M - 7 N Oi L I- O O N O M N O O N l0 M O Q m a Q m a 66 m m U O m m 0 m m m N o m C ~ W u_ ¢ ¢ Q O Z ❑ Q Q O r rn r r r r r r r @ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro T N O O O N - - N N o N N M O d m G n m mmmm m mm m m mco j O � }y o oo 0 0 0 0 o u> v o 0 0 - - o 0 0 o 0 0 o r Oi O O O (o Lo r 6i H u- N I (6 F o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD - o o - o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o 0 0 o o - 0 0 o - o 0 o 0 0 0 (p c a o �E m <Y ._ �U me - o ro o o o lO o 0 0 0 0 o v o u; O c 0 7 M Ea F " Ea -zaC O (O O 0 o o 0 o o 0 o O O �O Op rn I�u M cm m p ¢ U O m ¢ O O A O U fn JcL L y O 'a co o 0 N > O C E J O c O O. U_ .O E m W CO m m y (0 O. p1 N m o 01 O O N U m U N N J Q m U f0 O 0. (5 N N c V o o o o a > > c r o a ° (D ° ° z U (7 m :: a 'N 2 d 'm o c c E U f6 'N cLi c IL a o d o o o a o U o o o ¢ m o (n rn CL ' E 'VOj v_ai c E N c U U o a r � •N Y o O o a ❑ _ N ❑ ❑ N o O Q v o i� ❑ U ❑ N d N J o m W m ❑ V] N N J J T U J C... UI '= N N N O a O > E E C O C fn C .O N y N o L E L Y U 'O N N J L o C N N 'c 0 0 W O N o 0 2�' o (n N J U U a O V O aJ z Y o O O I m e 0_ C m S L D_ 2 L o C O N Ol 'n z V) N C Q c tNil A O o Up U m U N ¢ g O o aEi m o o' o Ek > Z m rn N O 'o _N "w J V d J 3 uj 3 ¢ Fn U N N N N J N N L L 2 L L N N N E N U Y ❑ U N ❑ Ol ❑J O ¢ ❑U) ❑ Z❑ d 0 ❑ ❑ H U 2 F U Z ❑ Z LL 7 ❑ ❑ u) N ❑ co❑ (n(n ,--i C U _ O Ci F"I - � U N N C O O o (,� O O O o O o o o O ;0 O O 00 C O O O o O 0 0 0 O G O O O Cl 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O o O _ U Co V M O cr0 M M . H H H (n m (n (n U) (n cd p p _O O _O O O_ (n m (n (n (n (n (n (n (n y F a o_ 2 2 2 x 2 U o_ U � (n ❑ ❑ � U � � U U ❑ U � y y jz� O U 0 cd i 1A cd a � U 318 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r OD au COr r o o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 ll 0 CD 4 Oi 4 4 4 h h W 0 to aD 6 CD0 M N O N W N N N N N N N O N N N N N N o rn an an 0) 0) 6) w b a o. d b G b c c c J Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ❑ (n CO O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ rrn rm r r o o CO O O CD o 0 O o o o O r Or on orN OrN 9 O n 4 O 4 r a0 OO a 0 Na) NNNN ONN N a o o 6) m o M 0) 0) 0) 0) o) 7 a c b G b CO i00 00Q ¢ ¢ ¢ Q Q ¢ - r i 0 4rNti ao(pj 0 0 n (D LL U C 3 (n � Q Q � ro r r r r r r r r r r o 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 o a o Y 0 o O o O o o O o o >`N w C C N 7 NN O U NU NU C C pO O O O N N N N N D) 0) d > > > _ > O . O a> O a) w w W (n Z ❑ ❑ ❑ A IC Q QD O aM @ ro r r r r r r r r r r r r o 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 LL v) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N (D CA m O O 6 4 4 6 — O 0 0 N N - N N N N OO r OL —> c 4 4 4 4 N _N N m m a > G b U U o d CO > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 a) o w w w a) m 0 cfl W Q Q U Z In ❑ ❑ ❑ N c'o m r o a v o v v rn a s 7 - o 0 a a a a O o O o 0 rn NM HlL N Cl) N N N N NNN N N N Cu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c N CD CDO CD CD CD CD O — 0 0 O CD O CD O O O 0 0 0 (Q O E (0 t0 U D1 C O O O N O U2 l0 C O CO j a)❑ C O O O )O O C O � �+ m 6 Op U On O W V L O M O) O ^ C C w U U Y C O L F-I m C O W > Q = O .y w O Y .> (D 0 Q W a � C N 3 C w N O w ('•� ❑ N y0 L L UN m y W ❑ E It C13O E @ d Y 0 oa rn w fn E o p N cUi E ❑ 3 cT Q ° m U ° o ° c N > • U c= -c o c � c c > a c � W LL F N N Lo ❑ ❑ Q 3IX Q CO O C O O y LO O ❑ w w CO 0 Lan N m wN > Q ON p ' QN w CO W a) OO > ❑ oE 0io a) a) > > > a)"+ 3 m @ c w w U L o f r o a o ❑ @ ❑ ❑ ❑ •> t E o m aE m 0 Y a d y rnU a rn 0) rn > Y - > ❑ w a O O CO U (Li (Li 8 c o E w a ❑ ❑ d o O awi a> awi ❑ c o U z cn d .� cn rn r a ❑ Q w m ❑N ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o q '> U CO o N L Q Qa in w Q m o a 0 9 a C� o 0 9 Q a QQ 0 0 w o U w U❑ Q 0 0 a) w 0 0 0 0� 0 0 U w U❑ O Q m 0) (n ❑ m ❑ 7 ❑Xk 7 m (n ❑ ❑ ❑Q ❑m ❑op O O ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 ❑�k U F-i Y U a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 )n cc r i. 0 0 o cn 0 co o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO co co co CO r ao r ao ao 9L4 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O o O o O O O O N O O O N (O r aD CA O NM V N O O_ O_ O_ _O _O _O O O_ O_ _O O_ O_ y V) (n (n m m m m (n m m CO ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cd (o (0 U (0 CO U U U U (n U U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C/] N (u O U q3 M > � a � U 319 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan L OD W M - 00 OD 0 0 W M O M 0 0 00 O CO O OOD W O O O CO 0 0 0 c 4 4 _ 4 4 4 4 4 LL N N N O N N N O a0 O O O N M Q N N N M C -6 � T CV N T N T T T T T C U 0 b m CO M M `O M M M `M `M M `M n a M o. M M M M M M M a) a) J - - 2 LL LL 2 2 2 2 Q Q 2 Q 2 2 2 2 2000 r 9 9 a0 - n (D °D CO °D 00 CO °D °D w 0 aO CO O O O O n n n r ca o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 o O o O Ci o 0 0 0 0 0 (O CO 7 7 N (O m ^ r CO (o �' f0 r a0 O N 1-- � N N ry N o N N ry O N ry O O O M N O O i M M M M 0 0 M a�i 0 `m `oa Co Co n M a n m m m m >o o >o 4) � ❑ ❑ - LL LL Q Q Q Q Z Z Z ❑ m I � Q LL � U � Q Q � OD r O O O - O 00 O C7 00 O O 0 0 Q 0 0 O O O O O O O Op O O O Y T O N N N an N N N N - N N O O O N M - O O N M Q N �' .0 >. >. >. >. >. a 0) 0) CV 00 m.f M M M M `m d N M M Q `M n `° a `° M M M M M M > wLL � LL LL Q Q Q Q Q 2 2 2 2 • y Q Q - O °po° DN au aoO7 0D 0D mCO 9 Ooo r-- I-- t- CO C C c U o C 0 0� 0 0 CO CO o w w NNW NNNO '0 O M 6 O O 6 7 7 N O d S NCD cc M 0 ca CO f0 �LU }y m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- o o v n o 0 0 0 HLL ui d 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c M m o 0 0 - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - o 0 0 0 Cp 0 E N Q t0 U O)C 0 W O O O M l0 CD CD O C O IDN N V N CO c M E C O to O O O C O (O N N 7 N M 1--. m 6 Up U °O F- c M ❑ U U T c c 'E U _ 0 0 � U) C ❑UCwE oN N QY Q.N• Q o y ❑¢EUT a) 2.2 o a) 0) 0. n o E a E ❑ aE O n m m CywL rO 2!,2 m LL3 MyO QL tio N U) O V 2LL w N M N E > w w . ' > Ci AS aa) 0 d w $ E E s m o M N F3i M u ❑_ U ` N U U 3 >i 7 Cl U 7 7 7 a�. >Cy1 0 U ❑ ❑y Oc @ Q❑ m` .Oc> °On=- �M O OO i U M°S �Oa�ai)•C E > ❑ U L � fl ❑ E D. od w ❑ E 0) c ccCO ad ° a2W O c ? ` M L r ` U _ _ IL IL LL I C CD CO 1 AOQwa- o w IDoQ0000mQ > o ` oa)o jE Co poD U C U a o6 C/](D M d aci O Q ❑ ❑ ❑ U ❑ U Ud Ud Ud U 10 U ❑ ❑Of U U U❑ U U ❑ U❑ 0 > > rn rn U Y U a) O O O 0 LO LO W I, W O O O O N O O O O O LO O O O _O of� O N MN M 7 Ot0 (0 N r O NC NNNm NM y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .+ cd ❑ ❑ ❑ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U) V) (0 C/] a) y^ Cd � O U A;,59 �Cd r U 320 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan s rn .0 m co OO m w 00 w w m m m 00 00 00 00 _ 00 m m m w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 4 4 R 4 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 O O O O OD CO � ri r` r cD O cc O cc - N N N N O LL N N N N O O O N N N N N N N N N M M M M N b b d b $ a $ m 0 0 0 o LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 00 OD 00 •. W 00 OD 00 10 00 10 10 CO OO OO aO CO .. W 00 OD 00 a0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O N t` 0 (O f0 0 V V r n 9 n O 00 OD COW N N N N M N O O O O O N N N N N N N N N Z Z Z Z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 U C Q LL •� � U � Q Q � r n r` I� r OD M OD OD 00 00 O 00 CO m W a0 CD CO 00 O 00 00 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 o Y (0 O O O Ll9 [V N n n V f0 (0 f0 (O C, O O O r n r N T y O N N N N O O N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N Q >T lT m D_ � >. T >. >, d LLz a' Qa ¢ Un00 LL LLLL LL 2 2 22 Cu 2222 LL LT LL 0 r r-- I- .. CO 0 CO (o CO CO 00 CO CO 00 0D CO co .. m ao CO ao ao LL q CO n r` n n CD 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 o O O O O 0) O O O O LL Cm (0 r- r` r ri CO 00 b o0 O O O O r� � r r` 00 r- m T O O CD O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N p a LU M (n (A (n LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N M yi4 Ln LO LO LO 0) 0) 0) O 0 O 0 O O O O O r- r- O O O O O O O 0) CO CO 00 00 CO CO H LL N N I I fp F o o 0 0 0 0 0 o - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O - O O O O O (0 O E N t0 U U m C O O O O l0 LO l0 N C, C, C, c 0 N CO M CO N N N N CO c O 0 0 0 -Fri- LO LO C O N Cl) M M N N N N I-7 m` Op U o. 'o 0 0)CL 0 0 0 o d m E U A c c a) o e o c aNi a o LL a U LO m m U LO p U O U 7 m cf6i p 0 d 0 0 0 p p m _T U U o o N N () C J O O O U U C c0 U ULL -_ o LO O a d O C p (0 (0 O t0 O O U 0 8 0 N o to N c C O C m a"i d 0 n o. ID n Q) m ( > LL I V 0- U0 CL 0 3 ns w •1 r rn U (0 0 C7 0 �' C7 a o w Q 0 , .N z o o °� a a °D N a5 a1 8 c m OL n LL a3i w m d Lu ID N • n 0) m m m m c rn 5 t5 00 > > o a>i Z m m U N O) W O (0 •� .y LL LL d d as C 2 01 0) CO 0) 0) CL � ar o M ro N U U U U '�E LL C7 w a n Q '2 t t t w E - atf of y 0 0 0 0 o a (D m a c0i = 0 •c 3 0 3 3 3 3 N CO c� (n o o v Q o o -{ d m H H H H U Z O O 0 -O "O (o Y w Y O J 0 J LL ` N > O Y J J J T C 3 N > > > > LL 111 x C d O. Q CL > A o LL 2 Q .0 -0 o 0 0 0 ai O O U E > ? > ? o k U N 0) 0) O 01 J > > > LO O) 0) O) 0) 0) O LL O N N N N 0 U F"I • Y U O 0 0 O O O O O o 0 0 0 O O 00 m O O N O N O O O M N 7 r OD 10 N O M (Oo p" r 00 (o W W O O r` G) (o LL O r- M M V LO LO Lti r O O_ _O _ O_ O_ O O O O O O OO 0 0 0 0 VUJ (n Q Q Q Q � S � S D N (u O > �C 0 321 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan L m 0 a0 ao 0 ao m r r r r r In r r 0 0 ao aD 0 co 0 0 0 _ ao q q g O o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 o g q o 0 0 0 o q o q O (0 f0 O O O O O' O' aD O N N In a) (O 1'- 00 r p O a N N N M M M M M Cl) N N M N N N O N N N N m `m CO m as as m o o m o o la {a 0 N N a) o Co n CO J 2 2 2 f 2 110 O 0 z 0 zo O 0 A A LL LL LL I LL LL Q 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 r r r r r r- r r r 00 00 co 00 W W 0 0 ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0110 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 - r M M M O O O O CO M O M r M O r N N CO N N N N CID W i 0 i6 l0 i6 a) a) a) CO U U O U m O N N N COy a) ry N y cc D_ j J 2 2 0 z O 0 z 0 0 0 LL LL LL LL LL Q r r ro a m /n Q :j lL � U O O O O Q O (O 0 N O Q a - O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r - o 0 0 0 - o Y IN N O O O O - O O I� OD O> M aD 0 N q O CID r aD f� p 7 >. >, �. >. N N N T O O N 00 N N N q Q 6 CO,C N f0 [0 a) W a) a) @ l0 O_ n o_ n a) N j j _ a) N N 2 N ~ WLL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Q Q Q Q LL ILL Q o O r 00 0 ao 0 0 1203 0 r r r r o r r r r or ro o 0 0 0 00 - o ii ui m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q _q r o m ao m ao r - - o 0 0 o w M o v) o r ao o) oo - - o n m >. N N N O O O O N N N N N r N N N N N N O a M N N N N N N M f6 (0 (6 f6 Q. `0. `a N of j j = N N N O. (6 (p w LL U- LL Q Q Q M LL LL LL Q �G N M a'6 O O O r r r r - 00 w w 0w O co O (O (o O �O o O O o -�a (6 0 O) 0 0 0 (n u> u2 uD u2 (n uD (n uD r g H LL Z5 E o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l CD-2? O O O O O O O - 0 0 l0 O O CD O O O O O O - O O O O O E 0 cc N Q �U U CO C O O O O O O O O O O l0 O M O O O O l0 O O O N c 0 N N N N OD C a) C O O O O O O O uD O N 10 O (0 ON O C O N m Op U 0 Q 0 U ULL E s" I j -ILID 0 'E N O a 'EO L O w p a) o c Co CO E .`�° f0 0) m o E d rj c ° o O U O a rn d E v coi 0 3 (�i aoi c Q 2 o n N U U °� a� c� 0 °o Q 0- � o ` 2 .w = O U C C J O 00 O != a a wo 2 a Y U16 a d c LL u- o Q a) p 5 O LL a Q 0 0)) E 0 o F w d LL ° o 0 g c E 2 d U CL Q Q Q LL' C "O N d O N O. U O U Q O LL z a U >Fi m o. n 2 � � o - w o a ¢ QYOE )n a ao a2 � O5 m N 2 oLL�tO U No Uo Q QLHc r^AOj> LL m d a ` z N N m N m> CID m @ U (n ID o Cc 0 z ON a Cl)M r D cn V a) O Oa) O O O O o O O a) E E a LL Q0 000 Q oQ Q Q Qa a aQ Ofof m m of 0 2 U CO U U Uo's U U U U U U U U JO a 0 UO U Uo> W O U IV> > " U1 ✓a 01 c O� v U 00 H Wy O U a) O O O 0 0 L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M V wN W 7-y N M O V 0 O r � �8 O 0 j M V )0 f0 r O = (0 (O O T 0) O O O O O O r r O � O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 r a a a a a U U F 2 CIS > > > > > > > U U U U U U U U U U U U U C7 C9 C7 (7 C9 a . EL a> y � o � M > ��r 322 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan L m oo aD m m eo r ao m ao r.- r r` m m ao eo m ao o 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 C. 0 o p p o 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 I.L N c0 D N N O MO O N 00 N N 0 0 0 0 7 n7 O O O O N r , , M r r r r O O r r r r a) )a a) a) (a a) N Cu a) a) N 4) 1'j U O N a) a1 w (a a1 a1 LL LL ❑ - LL U U O O Z ❑ 'C 0 Op 0 0 0 0 0 p O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O o 0 00 ° m n d) o) v o h o v N N O N O O O �y N a) W a) N N N O N p N p N U U L L > > U , J 0 OCD L0L LLL 0 z A li O � ¢ rn U) O z z C Cu cc ] caw N Q li C U O O Q O O Cu N NM Cu Q Q 2 p n Or` Or` r` � Or` On Or� On On Or� O� 90L O O V O O O N O 7r` drO`) wYQn N aN 0) N N O N p N O E > > O O > Cu O j N O j > > > O > ZO j ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ t ¢❑ ZwLL Z Z Q ❑ Z O Y OaT >a Tas Inm 00 Ca O O O Q O NO O O 0 0 O T N -6 4- 4- O6 N r r N C) aO N N pO N > o m mO > > d N0m s w 2 O z Qmj m m m v v a to (a (o v v v o v v v v o (p rn O coN n n n N N N I- co a0 N O) O) O) r H LL N I N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O (� O E (6 O �U U) 0)C N 10 l0 O N l0 O l0 O O 0) M V 7 V O O N V N O 0 O C O 7 r T r N V N r Cl) M V C a1 E N❑ N O O 0) M V V 0 0 N V N O M O C O N V N M c) O)(a 00. r C `p O cNi (O n f6 0. ani = � A N 0 W i a) d E ❑ m a w 0 3 [.E o c ca d w y 0 o r ¢ �� ¢ O > U o e 0 '3 r- o r a o 0 00 d a ❑ N n O y a) n y p•+ o rn ��' a) O n ofo Cm(D a C p QQ CyaOjC. O. O L LL C C U) CUC'O L C O Ill O O O U V (D Or�-�70 0 3 U v, U u, ❑m m(�a o m aE v c L rn m .6 > d aS > m �c = asj c" U m c dao-o L o c v v c =cc n a o n n o(S D)ja o(S Nwd `m d ¢ LL E m NO '� n L, ¢ 0- n ¢ o- 0 9 M 0 c c0 3 0o n 3 a ¢ d ¢ m w o m o 0 o�m ❑E ¢ E E o ¢ ov a 0 m E a (a E m mE d a N m E— C CD a 3 o S o n ❑ C n u d u z _>O O N O N ❑ 01 a) U m m NU❑ NNNN a) N a L E L❑ N L LL (n F = _ F = d d= LL (n co fn ai w E 0 E 0 a�i E d L L 0 O L m o E E> > > >� O > >� r r o N r u! ¢ O L.0 ¢ a)o o LF L n v L a o0 m as m U m m e U m o 0 02 ¢ 2 U7 U(n Q U O Z W N 2 U W U ❑(n W a) ❑(n Z Z Z O G) a) c > 0 U y ¢N 7 ❑ n m O F. y N Cl)O O O Op co 00 0) O C:) O M O O O O O O O O O O O 7 N� N O O O N O O N M 7 10 Co 1� 0) CD O r N 3 U O ` 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O {0 O O o_ L Q •n d x x x x x x x x L (n m (n m (n 0) (n m m U (n (n (n (D o 0- p d H 7 U U U U C z z Z Z Z Y Z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z U a; 0 F U z 3: VJ _ Z Un � rn � N y^ � O Q � U 323 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy 10 Implementation Plan t N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c LL ch 6 c7 N fD Ih W W N A NN6 O O O O O O O IO�- WO WO N M OOC) 00 000 NN N A O O O O O O O O O O O O cc -5 _5 -5 � O O N O O n (D Q u- + � U V) Q Q N O O O M w w w N OD o0 00 LLL � 0a0 0s1 CO D 00 a0 CO CD ID CD O O O O O O O O O O O O UYQ) ThA A A 0 O CO � tp � r WN N 6 � N a a a a ~ O 8'C W Q Q - Q QQ O Q Q O w CO C w 00 00 w 00 w 00 N 00 00 OD 00a N 00 f000 00 00 00 00 dN CO O O O o 4 WNN _ o9 4 05 O N N CO N N O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m N O W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ('7 y O O 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (`p O) • 0 w M w (O co (O (O co (O w to (O Co (O (O �LL N � l0 10 � � � � u� l0 10 10 l0 )O l0 l0 N N o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O N 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O (Q O 7 O E (6 t0 Cl) O)C N O W O C O LO E v) .c QC N O CO O C O O) 00 N L I O y U U 0 � N U C N U a C 2 U m '2 o L° a Q ` > U o 0 0 10 Q o ti U O N > U C 0) 0a0 U N (� A N LL iy N ~ N _ a) lO C O U F .� Ix F 7k 2 N Q F C% Z Z 'O 0 CO pCp O F C af IX Z CLU LL U F O CN O LL O Cr COU O U V x j N z 2 t w Qd ` Z N Ft .2 u o U U X n R XU U 0 F U o o@ 0. ca c 0 o LLm U LL 3 F m v y 0 0) N a) N `O C U) N N F N N F ,--i E 0 U c a xt v >2 T LLo > -o cc c >w y v > C z " 0) m m 2 0 � °�o o U � 0 0 0 0 0 o U T >_ -0 v 3 F m F 0 d� m F y U Z 0: o a) Z A m m o X r xx 2@ 0 a m w xx r XX g m 0 F w xx Q 3 3 Z X > X Q c MF y X .o X U o CO X u 0 o a U o LL a �Z Z ¢ a o U a_ Of a cn at o U a of m at 22 p m' U d 0 o O [� 0 o L N LO W () 0 Lu U Z Z W 0 0 0 OU O�U UO NU Ul�0 co fU� CO OU) U U Z 00 ) O N CO r r aD [O O aD v v v U�TO Z OO000) O Cc) U U U U U U U U U U U U U UOU C�dy O U 0^ I 1 > � a � U 324 J.Michael Ruane Judicial Center/Salem Trial Court TRC 9910 ST2 April 4,2007 Goody Clancy