FACADE MODIFICATIONS Salem
Redevelopment
®
Authority
Salem Redevelopment Authority Decision
9-11 Dodge Street, 217-219 and 231-251 Washington Street
Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use Development
Modifications to Building and Site Design
Meeting Date: August 14, 2019
Members Present: Grace Napolitano, Chair, Gary Barrett, David Guarino, Dean Rubin,
Russell Vickers
Members Absent: None
Decision: At a regular meeting of the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA), upon a motion
duly made and seconded, it was unanimously voted to approve the proposed modifications to
the building facade materials and colors, and the new transformer location and screening on the
project site at the Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use project at Dodge and Washington Streets subject to
the conditions of approval as listed herein.
Referenced Plans and Documents
1. Renderings of proposal, prepared by Opechee Construction Corporation, 11 Corporate
Drive, Belmont, NH 03220, submitted to the Board on 6/19/19.
2. Package of renderings and options, prepared by Opechee Construction Corporation, 11
Corporate Drive, Belmont, NH 03220, submitted to the Board on 7/12/19.
3. Design Review Board Recommendations dated 7/2/19 and 7/25/19.
4. Staff Comments dated 8/7/19.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Consistency with Design/Plans: Should the applicant determine that the proposed
modifications are no longer desired and/or viable, he/she/they shall return to the DRB to
review proposed modifications prior to making any changes in the field.
2. Facade at Hotel Corner
a. Materials and Colors: The applicant shall install Alpolic(Aluminum Composite
i Panel) in the color Mica MZG Grey on the wq Its at the hotel corner. The window
frames shall be aluminum in the color Charcoal, and the window inset shall be
Alpolic in the color CNC Charcoal.
b. Sealant: The applicant shall use a black sealant between the panels.
3 Residential Facade
a. Facade Inset Area Material and Color: The applicant shall install a Nichiha
Dimension Series, Noventry Tile (5 3/8" x 23 W), Panel = 18" x 12'-0", in the
color Opal on the fagade insets.
b. Relationshir) to Existinq Facade Material: The applicant shall ensure that the
Opal Nichiha panel shall not be placed immediately adjacent to the `Desert
Beige' panel on the pediment faces.
c. To, Level Canopies: The applicant shall investigate whether the white canopies
on the uppermost level of the residential portion of the structure have been
fabricated. If not, the DRB recommends modifying the approved color from white
to black.
4. Site Plan Modification: Transformer Location and Screeninc;
a. Location of Transformer: The applicant may locate the transformer at the corner
of Washington Street as proposed due to the existing infrastructure in this
location that will facilitate the addition of this new building on the electrical grid.
b. Fence: The applicant shall install a fence to screen the transformer in
accordance with Scheme A as presented. The fence will be a metal 'Shadow
Box' style, 6'-0" in height, in the color black. The applicant shall install the gate to
face the courtyard versus the intersection/public way unless National Grid
determines that this location prevents access to the infrastructure. Should this
be the case, the applicant shall notify the DRB, via the Planning Department, of
this change.
c. Landscaping: The applicant shall install plantings in front of the shadowbox
fence. The plantings do not have to be identical but should provide a visual
buffer and natural screening for the transformer and fencing.
Findings
1. Facade Material Revision: The Board finds that the proposed fagade material change
from Cembrit to aluminum composite is desirable as the new material will feature a
cleaner, smoother appearance since the fasteners will be hidden. The colors of the
aluminum composite closely resemble the originally-approved Cembrit colors, thereby
not substantially altering the look of the fagade. The Board also finds that the use of
black sealant in the joints is preferable to give the building more dimension and visual
interest.
2. Transformer Location: While the revised location for the transformer and associated
cabinet is not ideal being at the major intersection and gateway to downtown Salem, the
DRB understands that National Grid has determined that this location is the only viable
option for the site given the layout of the building, the building's energy needs, and the
existing infrastructure to which the new transformer will access.
3. Transformer Screening: The applicant has proposed a combination of vertical fencing in
black and landscaping to screen the transformer. The combination of the two will help to
visually screen the infrastructure from the public way. Additionally, the location of the
doors to the fencing is such that National Grid will not disrupt traffic when accessing the
infrastructure for maintenance.
4. Juliet Balcony Revision: The Board found that due to the placement of the balconies,
residents would be looking down onto the restaurant patio, which is not desirable. The
removal of the sliders and balconies and installation of traditional windows to match
those o the building is preferred. f
Signature of the SRA
By the signature below, I certify that this decision accurately reflects the actions of the SRA.
,y, n ' I
1w_
Tom Daniel, AICP Date
Executive Director
Salem
® Redevelopment
Authority
SRA Decision
9-11 Dodge Street, 217-219 and 231-251 Washington Street
Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use Development
Modifications to Facade Colors
Meeting Date: February 13, 2019
Members Present: Gary Barrett, David Guarino, Dean Rubin
Members Absent: Grace Napolitano, Russell Vickers
Decision: At a regular meeting of the Salem Redevelopment Authority(SRA), upon a motion
duly made and seconded, it was unanimously voted to approve the proposed modifications to
the colors for the brick and trim details on the fagade of the Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use project at
Dodge and Washington Streets subject.to the conditions of approval as listed herein.
Referenced Plans and Documents
1. `Exterior Elevations', prepared by Opechee Construction Corporation, 11 Corporate
Drive, Belmont, NH 03220, dated 6/15/18.
2. Staff Comments dated 2/7/19.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Consistencv with Design/Plans: Should the applicant determine that the recommended
color scheme, i.e. changing the trim color from bronze to black and changing the brick
color from Old Port Blend Narrow Flash to Old Port Red Range needs to be further
modified, he/she/they shall return to the DRB to review proposed modifications prior to
making any changes in the field.
2. Height of Horizontal Window Trim: The applicant shall reduce the height of the
'horizontal floorplate window trim' on the commercial/transition portions of the structure
to match the configuration as originally approved that depicted a thinner horizontal trim.
Findings
1. The SRA found that the differing manufacturer interpretations of the color bronze and the
alternative to paint trim pieces bronze after market so that they match is not practical for
the overall visual presentation of the structure and for its long-term maintenance.
2. While the originally-approved brick color, containing brown edging, is attractive and
would coordinate with the originally-approved bronze trim color, it no longer coordinates
with the black trim.
3. The SRA found that the proposed Old Port Red Range brick color is an appropriate
choice and will not be a detriment to the appearance of the building.
4. The SRA approves the modifications to the trim color and the brick; though it notes that
the window configuration on the transition portions of the structure, in terms of the size of
the horizontal window trim, as shown on the revised elevations, is not consistent with
that which was originally approved and has found the new configuration not desirable.
Signature of the SRA
By the signature below, I certify that this decision accurately reflects the actions of the SRA.
Tom Daniel, AICP
Executive Director
AIL Salem
BERedev-,Iopi;,-� 1,
Autho l'l
DRB Design Review Recommendation
9-11 Dodge Street, 217-219 and 231-251 Washington Street
Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use Development
Review of Proposed Modifications to Juliet Balconies
Meeting Date: June 26, 2019
Members Present: Paul Durand, Chair, Helen Sides, Vice-Chair, David Jaquith, Catherine
Miller, Marc Perras, J. Michael Sullivan
Members Absent: Glenn Kennedy
Decision: At a regular meeting of the Design Review Board (DRB), upon a motion duly made
and seconded, it was unanimously voted to recommend approval of the proposed removal of
four slider doors with Juliet Balconies and replacement of same with windows to match the rest
of the building on the western facade of the residential portion of the project.
Referenced Document
1. Renderings of proposal, prepared by Opechee Construction Corporation, 11 Corporate
Drive, Belmont, NH 03220, submitted to the Board on 6/19/19.
Condition of Approval
1 Consistency with Design/Plans: Should the applicant determine that the proposed
modifications are no longer desired and/or viable, he/she/they shall return to the DRB to
review proposed modifications prior to making any changes in the field.
Findings
1. The Board found that due to the placement of the balconies, residents would be looking
down onto the restaurant patio, which is no desirable. The removal of the sliders and
balconies and installation of traditional windows to match those on the building is
preferred.
2. The modification does not negatively impact the overall architecture and presentation of
the structure as originally-approved.
Signature of the DRB: By the signature below, I certify that this decision accurately reflects the
actions of the DRB.
Paul Durand, Chair Date
Salem
® Redevelopment
Authority
DRIB Design Review Recommendation
9-11 Dodge Street, 217-219 and 231-251 Washington Street
Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use Development
Review of Proposed Modifications to Fagade Materials and Site Plan
Meeting Date: July 24, 2019
Members Present: Paul Durand, Chair, Helen Sides, Vice-Chair, Glenn Kennedy, Catherine
Miller, Marc Perras, J. Michael Sullivan
Members Absent: David Jaquith
Decision: At a regular meeting of the Design Review Board (DRB), upon a motion duly made
and seconded, it was unanimously voted to recommend approval of the proposed fagade
material and site plan modifications as presented and conditioned herein.
Referenced Document
1. Package of renderings and options, prepared by Opechee Construction Corporation, 11
Corporate Drive, Belmont, NH 03220, submitted to the Board on 7/12/19.
2. Staff Comments dated 7116/19.
Condition of Approval
1. Consistency with Design/Plans: Should the applicant determine that the proposed
modifications are no longer desired and/or viable, he/she/they shall return to the DRB to
review proposed modifications prior to making any changes in the field.
2. Facade at Hotel Corner
a. Materials and Colors: The applicant shall install Alpolic (Aluminum Composite
Panel) in the color Mica MZG Grey on the walls at the hotel corner. The window
frames shall be aluminum in the color Charcoal, and the window inset shall be
Alpolic in the color CNC Charcoal.
b. Sealant: The applicant shall use a black sealant between the panels.
3. Residential Fa ade
a. Facade Inset Area Material and Color: The applicant shall install a Nichiha
Dimension Series, Noventry Tile (5 3/8" x 23 '/e"), Panel = 18"x 12'-0", in the
color Opal on the fagade insets.
b. Relationship to Existinc Facade Material: The applicant shall ensure that the
Opal Nichiha panel shall not be placed immediately adjacent to the 'Desert
Beige' panel on the pediment faces.
c. Top Level Cano ies: The applicant shall investigate whether the white canopies
on the uppermost level of the residential portion of the structure have been
fabricated. If not, the DRB recommends modifying the approved color from white
to black.
4. Site Plan Modification: Transformer Location and Screening
a. Location of Transformer: The applicant may locate the transformer at the corner
of Washington Street as proposed due to the existing infrastructure in this
location that will facilitate the addition of this new building on the electrical grid.
b. Fence: The applicant shall install a fence to screen the transformer in
accordance with Scheme A as presented. The fence will be a metal 'Shadow
Box' style, 6 4' in height, in the color black. The applicant shall install the gate to
face the courtyard versus the intersection/public way unless National Grid
determines that this location prevents access to the infrastructure. Should this
be the case, the applicant shall notify the DRB, via the Planning Department, of
this change.
c. Landscaping: The applicant shall install plantings in front of the shadowbox
fence. The plantings do not have to be identical but should provide a visual
buffer and natural screening for the transformer and fencing.
Findings
1. Facade Material Revision: The Board finds that the proposed fagade material change
from Cembrit to aluminum composite is desirable as the new material will feature a
cleaner, smoother appearance since the fasteners will be hidden. The colors of the
aluminum composite closely resemble the originally-approved Cembrit colors, thereby
not substantially altering the look of the fagade. The Board also finds that the use of
black sealant in the joints is preferable to give the building more dimension and visual
interest.
2. Transformer Location: While the revised location for the transformer and associated
cabinet is not ideal being at the major intersection and gateway to downtown Salem, the
DRB understands that National Grid has determined that this location is the only viable
option for the site given the layout of the building, the building's energy needs, and the
existing infrastructure to which the new transformer will access.
3. Transformer Screening: The applicant has proposed a combination of vertical fencing in
black and landscaping to screen the transformer. The combination of the two will help to
visually screen the infrastructure from the public way. Additionally, the location of the
doors to the fencing is such that National Grid will not disrupt traffic when accessing the
infrastructure for maintenance.
Signature of the DRB: By the signature below, I certify that this decision accurately reflects the
actions of the DRB.
Paul Durand, Ch it Date
DRB Design Review Recommendation
9-11 Dodge Street, 217-219 and 231-251 Washington Street
Hampton Inn/Mixed-Use Development
Review of Proposed Modifications to Façade Colors
Meeting Date: January 23, 2019
Members Present: Paul Durand, Chair, David Jaquith, Glenn Kennedy, Catherine Miller,
Helen Sides, J. Michael Sullivan
Members Absent: Christopher Dynia
Decision: At a regular meeting of the Design Review Board (DRB), upon a motion duly made
and seconded, it was unanimously voted to recommend approval of the proposed
modifications to the colors for the brick and trim details on the façade of the Hampton Inn/Mixed-
Use project at Dodge and Washington Streets.
Referenced Plans and Documents
1. ‘Exterior Elevations’, prepared by Opechee Construction Corporation, 11 Corporate
Drive, Belmont, NH 03220, dated 6/15/18.
2. Staff Comments dated 1/16/19.
Conditions of Approval: The DRB recommends incorporating the following conditions of
approval should the SRA approve the requested modifications:
1. Consistency with Design/Plans: Should the applicant determine that the recommended
color scheme, i.e. changing the trim color from bronze to black and changing the brick
color from Old Port Blend Narrow Flash to Old Port Red Range, he/she/they shall return
to the DRB to review proposed modifications prior to making any changes in the field.
2. Height of Horizontal Window Trim: The applicant shall reduce the height of the
‘horizontal floorplate window trim’ on the commercial/transition portions of the structure
to match the configuration as originally approved that depicted a thinner horizontal trim.
Findings
1. The Board found that the differing manufacturer interpretations of the color bronze and
the alternative to paint trim pieces bronze after market so that they match is not practical
for the overall visual presentation of the structure and for its long-term maintenance.
2. While the originally-approved brick color, containing brown edging, is attractive and
would coordinate with the originally-approved bronze trim color, it no longer coordinates
with the black trim.
3. The Board found that the proposed Old Port Red Range brick color is an appropriate
choice and will not be a detriment to the appearance of the building.
4. The Board expresses its support of the proposed modifications; though it notes that the
window configuration on the transition portions of the structure, in terms of the size of the
horizontal window trim, as shown on the revised elevations, is not consistent with that
which was originally approved and has found the new configuration not desirable.
Signature of the DRB: By the signature below, I certify that this decision accurately reflects the
actions of the DRB.
_______________________________________
Paul Durand, Chair
D
D
DYHW
V
STC
RIM=31.39
INV=28.34
CB
RIM=31.23
INV=28.23
83LF 12" CPE
S=0.043
ROOF DRAINAGE
INV=25.15
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
DMH
RIM=28.30
INV=25.00
6" CI
S=0.021
36LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
INV=24.4
R
I
(
F
6" DI FIRE
PROTECTION
WATER SERVICE
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
PR
RELOCATE EXIST. HYDRANT
PROP. 6" DI LATERAL
EXISTING 6" LATERAL
TO BE ABANDONED
AND 12" TEE REMOVED
4" DI DOMESTIC
WATER SERVICE
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
CUT & CAP
EXIST. SERVICE
AT MAIN
ABANDON EXIST.
SERVICE
PROPOSED TAPPING
SLEEVE AND VALVE
GHTDSSED/ORL BE
ACH
G
EXACT
ET
ANCY
ND
NLESS
TAPS
BJECT
GING
AND
ING
NFIRM
E
WATER,
UBLIC
OR
WORK,
Y
N
S ARE
TING
E NEW
H THE
E-IN.
H
E
ON
PREVIOUS
TRANSFORMER
LOCATION
Transformer Location REVISION
Washington Street Salem MA
Opechee Construction Corp. date: May 14, 2019
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
32.0032.0032.0032.0032.0032
.
0
0
32
.
0
0
32
.
0
0 32.0032
.
0
032.0032.0026
.
0
0
26
.
0
0
26.0026.0032.0032.0032.0032.0021
.
5
021.5021.5021.5021
.
5
0
21
.
5
021.5021.5021.50
21.50
21.50
21.5020.3321.5020.3323
.
0
0
23
.
0
0
23
.
0
023.0023.0021.5021.0021.0026
.
0
0
21.50
14
.
0
0
14
.
0
014.0014.0014.0014.0014.0014.0014
.
0
0
toc 20.4 boc 20.1
21.0 21.00
toc:20.83boc:20.50toc:20.80boc:20.47toc:20.80boc:20.47
22.8022.80
22.8022.80
toc:23.37
boc:
23.04
24.87
toc:
24.87
boc:
24.54
toc:
24.87
boc:
24.54
25.65
26.00
tow:
31.50
tow:
26.00
31.50
31.84
32.00
31.85
31.50
31.50
31.50
31.50
31.50
32.00
32.00
32.00
32.00
31.87
32.00
31.85
tow:
32.00
bow:
24.00
23.00 21.75
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
Slab on Grade Top: 26.00
Gravel Base Top: 25.67
Subgrade top: 24.92
Slab on Grade Top: 21.00
Gravel Base Top: 17.50
Subgrade top: 16.75
Slab on Grade Top: 23.00
Gravel Base Top: 22.67
Subgrade top: 21.92
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Slab on Grade
Pavement T
Gravel Base
Subgrade t
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
S
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
D
D
5,000 GALLO
GREASE TRA
RIM: 14.0
INVin: 10.2
INVout: 10.0
R
GROU
RECHAR
(S
IN
INSPECTION DMH
RIM: 14.0
15" INVin: 10.0
10" INVout: 10.5 MAX. 15" D
2
S=0.0
INS
6" DI (MINIMUM)
CONNECT TO EXISTIN
APPROX. INV: 14.5
VERIFY STUB DEPTH P
INSTALLTION OF INTE
4" & 6" INCH DI
DOMESTIC & FIRE
WATER SERVICES
8" INCH
CONNEC
STUB AP DYH
ONLY
ONLYONLY
ONLYPROP. CURB TO CLOSE
EXISTING CURB CUT
RETAIN EXISTLIGHT POLERETAIN EXIST CONCRETESIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS
PROP LANDSCAPED
AREA (TYP)PROP VE
GRAN CU
RETAIN EXIST MASTARM AND TRAFFICCONTROLCABINET
PROP VERT
GRAN CURB
RETAIN EXISTPEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
RETAIN EXIST SIGN
PROP PERMEABLE PAVERS
(SEE HARDSCAPE PLANS)ND STREET
LEFT LANE
MUST
TURN LEFT
MUST
RIGHT LANE
TURN RIGHTDYCLBWLLSWEL MEET EXIST. STRIPINGBY OTHERS (TYP.)(6) PROP PARKIN
PROP 10' WIDE
CROSSWALK
PROP. LANSCAPE STRIP
PROP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK
RETAIN EXIST SIGN
MEE
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
S
T
R
I
P
I
N
G
BY O
T
H
E
R
S
(
T
Y
P
.
)
WASHINGTON STR
STC
RIM=31.39
INV=28.34
CB
RIM=31.23
INV=28.23
10LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
10LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
83LF 12" CPE
S=0.043
ROOF DRAINAGE
INV=25.15
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
DMH
RIM=28.30
INV=25.00
6" CI
S=0.021
36LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
INV=24.4
PROP. HYDRANT &
6" DI LATERAL
EXIST. EMH 65
(2) 4" PVC DUCTS
FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE
UTILITY SCREEN (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)MEET EXIST CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PROP. VERTICAL LANDSCAPE CURB, TYP.
(SEE HARDSCAPE PLANS & DETAILS)
30'r
5' x 5' BUS CABINET SETBACK 5' FROM TRANSFORMER
7' x 7' TRANSFORMER PAD
26.00
25.67
REVISED
TRANSFORMER
LOCATION
Transformer Location REVISION
Washington Street Salem MA
Opechee Construction Corp. date: May 14, 2019
D
D
DYHW
V
STC
RIM=31.39
INV=28.34
CB
RIM=31.23
INV=28.23
83LF 12" CPE
S=0.043
ROOF DRAINAGE
INV=25.15
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
DMH
RIM=28.30
INV=25.00
6" CI
S=0.021
36LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
INV=24.4
R
I
(
F
6" DI FIRE
PROTECTION
WATER SERVICE
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
PR
RELOCATE EXIST. HYDRANT
PROP. 6" DI LATERAL
EXISTING 6" LATERAL
TO BE ABANDONED
AND 12" TEE REMOVED
4" DI DOMESTIC
WATER SERVICE
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
CUT & CAP
EXIST. SERVICE
AT MAIN
ABANDON EXIST.
SERVICE
PROPOSED TAPPING
SLEEVE AND VALVE
GHTDSSED/ORL BEACH
G
EXACT
ET
ANCY
ND
NLESS
TAPS
BJECT
GING
AND
ING
NFIRM
E
WATER,
UBLIC
OR
WORK,
Y
N
S ARE
TING
E NEW
H THE
E-IN.
H
E
ON
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
32.0032.0032.0032.0032.0032
.
0
0
32
.
0
0
32
.
0
0 32.0032
.
0
032.0032.0026
.
0
0
26
.
0
0
26.0026.0032.0032.0032.0032.0021
.
5
021.5021.5021.5021
.
5
0
21
.
5
021.5021.5021.50
21.50
21.50
21.5020.3321.5020.3323
.
0
0
23
.
0
0
23
.
0
023.0023.0021.5021.0021.0026
.
0
0
21.50
14
.
0
0
14
.
0
014.0014.0014.0014.0014.0014.0014
.
0
0
toc
20.4
boc
20.1
21.0 21.00
toc:
20.83
boc:
20.50
toc:
20.80
boc:
20.47
toc:
20.80
boc:
20.47
22.8022.80
22.8022.80
toc:
23.37
boc:
23.04
24.87
toc:
24.87
boc:
24.54
toc:
24.87
boc:
24.54
25.65
26.00
tow:
31.50
tow:
26.00
31.50
31.84
32.00
31.85
31.50
31.50
31.50
31.50
31.50
32.00
32.00
32.00
32.00
31.87
32.00
31.85
tow:
32.00
bow:
24.00
23.00 21.75
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
Slab on Grade Top: 32.00
Gravel Base Top: 31.67
Subgrade top: 30.91
Slab on Grade Top: 26.00
Gravel Base Top: 25.67
Subgrade top: 24.92
Slab on Grade Top: 21.00
Gravel Base Top: 17.50
Subgrade top: 16.75
Slab on Grade Top: 23.00
Gravel Base Top: 22.67
Subgrade top: 21.92
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 21.50
Gravel Base Top: 21.17
Subgrade top: 20.42
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Slab on Grade
Pavement T
Gravel Base
Subgrade t
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
S
Slab on Grade Top: 14.00
Pavement Top: 13.58
Gravel Base Top: 13.50
Subgrade top: 12.75
D
D
5,000 GALLO
GREASE TRA
RIM: 14.0
INVin: 10.2
INVout: 10.0
R
GROU
RECHAR
(S
IN
INSPECTION DMH
RIM: 14.0
15" INVin: 10.0
10" INVout: 10.5 MAX. 15" D
2
S=0.0
INS
6" DI (MINIMUM)
CONNECT TO EXISTIN
APPROX. INV: 14.5
VERIFY STUB DEPTH P
INSTALLTION OF INTE
4" & 6" INCH DI
DOMESTIC & FIRE
WATER SERVICES
8" INCH
CONNEC
STUB AP DYH ONLY
ONLYONLY
ONLYPROP. CURB TO CLOSE
EXISTING CURB CUT
RETAIN EXISTLIGHT POLE
RETAIN EXIST CONCRETE
SIDEWALK AND ADA RAMPS
PROP LANDSCAPED
AREA (TYP)PROP VE
GRAN CU
RETAIN EXIST MASTARM AND TRAFFICCONTROLCABINET
PROP VERT
GRAN CURB
RETAIN EXISTPEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
RETAIN EXIST SIGN
PROP PERMEABLE PAVERS
(SEE HARDSCAPE PLANS)ND STREET
LEFT LANE
MUST
TURN LEFT
MUST
RIGHT LANE
TURN RIGHTDYCLBWLLSWEL MEET EXIST. STRIPINGBY OTHERS (TYP.)(6) PROP PARKIN
PROP 10' WIDE
CROSSWALK
PROP. LANSCAPE STRIP
PROP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK
RETAIN EXIST SIGN
MEE
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
S
T
R
I
P
I
N
G
BY O
T
H
E
R
S
(
T
Y
P
.
)
WASHINGTON STR
STC
RIM=31.39
INV=28.34
CB
RIM=31.23
INV=28.23
10LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
10LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
83LF 12" CPE
S=0.043
ROOF DRAINAGE
INV=25.15
(SEE MEP PLANS
FOR CONTINUATION)
DMH
RIM=28.30
INV=25.00
6" CI
S=0.021
36LF 12" CPE
S=0.017
INV=24.4
PROP. HYDRANT &
6" DI LATERAL
EXIST. EMH 65
(2) 4" PVC DUCTS
FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE
UTILITY SCREEN (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)MEET EXIST CONCRETE SIDEWALK
PROP. VERTICAL LANDSCAPE CURB, TYP.
(SEE HARDSCAPE PLANS & DETAILS)
30'r
5' x 5' BUS CABINET SETBACK 5' FROM TRANSFORMER
7' x 7' TRANSFORMER PAD
26.00
25.67
*
REVISED
LOCATION
PREVIOUS
LOCATION
Transformer Location REVISION
Washington Street Salem MA
Opechee Construction Corp. date: May 14, 2019
This submission addresses two (2) specific exterior materials and proposes a revision.
The previously specified and approved window frame color for the residential wing was
dark bronze (brown). This color was selected in conjunction with the masonry (Old Port
Blend Narrow Flash Range), which also had some brown tones due to its narrow flash.
The design called for the color matching of materials being provided by different
manufacturers, i.e. the window frames, the balcony rails, and the trim and coping. This
was to be achieved by painting some materials since different manufacturers don't offer
exact color matching.
Ownership, as well as Opechee Construction, has concerns regarding the maintenance
of post-manufacture painting, specifically the durability and appearance of such-paint
over time.
We propose revising the dark bronze (brown) window frames to black. This will enable
other manufacturers, i.e. balcony rails, trim, and coping to also be a matching black.
Also we propose revising the masonry to Old Port Red Range which will have no brown
flash and be complimentary with black trim.
- _ • .:craw �
■� , ■ evil
i �� ■■ a M Peluso:..all, 111 1111 11 11 11 !11 1111 11 11 11l :11 II11 II if I! •
- .J • ■■ 1■ ■■ �■ ,� ■■�■ ■ � � !■ ���r�� iin EI III i [ 1 Il Ill I 1 II II I!I I I [
- - '� ■■ ■' 1■ ■�'• :. ■■■ �■ ■ ��• ■>� ■■ •� ■■ r AN 1111
t
ro
3 im I!, qIll n'
Nip
- - • /I(�/ �. --- -- �i♦■�■ * _ _ tea' it�■ �-■�■■♦ ■ t�® I •
ar -�
PREVIOUS ELEVATION window frames, balcony trim & balcony rails: dark bronze ,
milli `Wo �1111111 11 •
IF
A
T12 ■r ■■ ■. ■■ ■■ ■■
■ ■I■l MM ■■ ■ ■ ■■
s •� i �`
■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ p ■—JIMM mill MME
_ e
PROPOSED REVISED ELEVATION . window frames, balcony trim & balcony rails: black
pp-
- -. HMO Ins ®n ��1,�.9'Iln n o ��:0#� n II �:� 1�� �� III
I1111 n n �; II II1I II
- - • IF",,
1011WIC III
I1IR RH n n 1111 . AN II iI 11111
1 III" DiI 11 11 flli II� �.11�1 sill 1I u 11.
PREVIOUS ELEVATION window frames: dark bronze masonr : Old Port Blend, Narrow Flash Ran e
•
son
•
ME
INT
0111 III's ■o■ r. In■ ■ r ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ®■.... _
MEME
�, a i�■
mill � ■■■ H■ ■ ■ on ■ ■■ ■ ■■ ��a •
MEMO NUM■ ■■■ i■ i -� �i■ _ - i■ ■ ■ -ei - UH ■ ■ Iff
mill 1110 111111 ■� ■ 11 No MEMO MMIMMI
■■■■ .■■■
mill 110110 ■ ■, ■ ■ ME 1 HE L 11 ON s oo n
MEMO ■ ■ �,:� i - r: [ .. �H 11 H , U 11:1
MEMO ■■■
PROPOSED REVISED ELEVATION window frames: black masonry: Old Port, Red Range ' •'
•
A
.r y-
�y
41,
till
- - J-
06
v t P1 i ,- lip . Lair ,' *.,,,
- � A1� 1FAi � j,ll +k
�yf, .f "f fid.9l --- — — — — — � �w� *+�rtr• +y�r �►Ik III,
... ,y�J:. -- - '±�iiY �a *, •.# i rw, "`.'a1rFk;1UFF+F' � sr3� .` . ryry -.rr.•n��•rx�r.x t� 1 cy.'` _ {. i .
.'. �. -.,ice-� - .�?. ���+� ��•
WI
1
PI bo hr 5'S - _ VrY -- f i ry_ rl R �1 'ti R '• �;-rM-L iR"L � +' ��'
.. i�*+r�S++R � .;:� err � �� `-..--`,� �•Y�� � �. �' ..: }' � r• �� ,w�
oil
IL
pt
3 wall
— 4
I yi * r .' } •h. =� yr,._'�.ti- 4 hati i s14R+ Y'Y • + ■
'xAWN- r - - •T it .k I *��"ti -s
+ . in
M * 5 } .■ '. ths+ •' *'1 _ * mar
� MF 1- #. �S .i + 3 '�ti`+ \ '- -y �' i *�' �i; -• w � F} }`r; � �M1 {#. , . , 3±+ {� • '.a 4-i•f }., _ 'c
_ � 1 k + -pk
• y iF '��. •� `±+ rf � rn•'Jpti ti - - .r: ._ _ tL k,+. _ �k ~y
1, "OR,
! i - l - may . -x -• ta-` { •�{ _
,Y11
. - •�t'.'1 _ - - �• } - - - - �.�. -' *�.aw - '!�-. ��'- •~ _tea "{ 4 '�4 -'w d 'il
41
4r Now, mum
PO IP J MOP,
1 a r
I`j{`' it • iF i � I� � _��Y �1� j �fi_ .� _� y _ _ .
. -
' +"
JL End
11,6
- Y ►��