The URL can be used to link to this page

2015-PLANNING BOARD G I'ii�. i� i� 4 �� L9 � �li_. fro. ��.,f{i� (� Il 0 PLANNING BOARD Meeting Materials 2014-2015 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1016 JUL -SPI: 48 CITY c E NOTICE OF MEETING You am hemby notified that the SalemPlanningBaard wit be hcddinga Public Hearing m Thursday,July 7, 2016 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Sz, Saletn MA BenAmLaon, Chair REVISED" MEETING AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 11. REGULARAGENDA A. Location: 14 Bertuccio Ave. (Map 24,Lot 105) Applicant: Nathan Jacobson Description: A continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations to allow the construction of a roadway to serve seven (7) residential lots, and a Stormwater Management Permit in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one acre. B. Location: 70-921/2 Boston St. (Map 15,Lot 299 &Map 16,Lot 139) Applicant: 139 Grove Street Realty Trust Description: REVISION: The applicant requested a continuance to July 21, 2016 of the public hearing for a Site Plan Review,Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review; Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District; Section 8A North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District; and a Stormwater Management Permit in accordance with Salem Code of Ordinances Chapter 37. Specifically, the applicant proposes the redevelopment of the former Flynntan site consisting of removal of three structures on the property, the construction of 50 residential dwelling units within two separate buildings and a commercial retail space with parking provided on the site. City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for July 7,2016 Page 2 of 2 C. Location: 40 Circle Hill Drive (Map 9,Lot 255; Land Court Plan 856-J, Lots 56, 57, 59 and 60) Applicant: Bartlett&Steadman Development Corp. Description: Update on the status of construction of the Circle Hill Subdivision, and vote on an extension request of the subdivision approval and Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit. D. Location: 14 and 16 Almeda St. (Map 14,Lot 116 and Map 14, Lot 117) Applicant: Town and Country Homes, Inc. Description: A continuance of the public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. E. Location: 81 Highland Ave; 108 Jefferson Ave; Old Rd; 1 Dove Ave; 79 Highland Ave; 55 Highland Ave; and 57 Highland Ave (Map 24, Lots 1,2, 88, 19,216,218 220; and Map 14, Lot 129) Applicant: North Shore Medical Center, Inc. Description: The applicant requested a continuance to July 21, 2016 of the public hearing for a Site Plan Review, in accordance with the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review; and a Stormwater Management Permit in accordance with Salem Code of Ordinances Chapter 37. Specifically, the applicant proposes to construct a new Emergency Department/Inpatient Beds building, a new front Lobby expansion, renovation resulting in an addition of 119,735 square feet and repurposing of 119,734 square feet of interior space, internal driveway and parking modifications, landscape and hardscape improvements and utility infrastructure modifications to their existing campus. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 16, 2016 IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS This notice posted on "Offic al B Iletin Bgar Ci H 11 lem, Mass. on �Jr� ddr A. Discussion of an expanded role r the�I71 �rn in accordant wit GL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. V. ADJOURNMENT Kmwyxtr rights under the OpenMer?tingLawM.G.L. c 30A 518-25 and City Orli unx§ 2-2028 through§ 2-2033. '0\�JASF -(i:-N S'Ot };l, S:,LE.A MASSACH:S .I S 91910 ' PHONE 97S.61 0.%85 FAX 978".7:-0.01(kt T� C A City of Salem - Meeting Sign-In Sheet �f Board P�U,'(1Yl Date IOU / / ZDI(.67 Name Mailing Address Phone # E-mail l�h Cao✓f T� S�,^'!'�� C1 /An . C�o✓I,`v 4/ s�'•r�ec,co.. 30 R G - cl 0l�A a6 Llucc-o Au 9?r- 7g( 1s1sr 9 -2Tuccj,3 4uc- . 7� . s/a. f; 0?, � c�d (� C(iff 6eddvy� ZZ 45j57,7 2255 G64-l_cQ io &r- 79 a lfk� tall.c�. .�'��w"' S'�a}l � 7 Qs��cc'iu Y�✓c � 7� ' 7y�"g�-� �SzoohG3@_4��( . co..., � (751{P 2� s. aQah�ccKc�«ti � N.o,w+ks�i.Ao�� 2 $'r�t��,ns �$2�98bo�i c@..e��_4.p�yaln.ar�•W� &,ildk Ul a cdm V$ &v4v c c 'o /tud 4? 20.W) lSbn l r3ei //Y!n_ l�dr 97fr 7�/'jF,�Sa��/n /A /06Zez��tOd.Cp C-7 VU � � ( m P P _� �3 ��r� / �i�' Sfi• �l�c6 31� �)4K �, ��.,�� v,,,� �,�.(- Page 'Pagea of 1 I Name Mailing Address Phone # E-mail Page of CITY OF SALEM PLANNING- OARD 1 1115 DEC 1 i P 1: 34 t} NOTICE-OF MEETING CITY CLEP,K, SA-EM. MASS. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,December 17,2015 at 7:00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair REVSIED" MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • December 3, 2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. Description:"The applicant has requested a continuance request of the public hearing • to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on January 7, 2016 for a continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on January 7, 2016 for a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review,Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original • decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for December 17,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6,Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. IV. OLD/NE W BUSINE SS V. ADJOURNMENT Krvwyour ngg&tarter dx OpenMce[ingLawM.G.L. c 30A § 18-25 and City Ord mnx§2-2028 dRu4§2-2033. • This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, W, s. on /-PG/,7, 0201.5' at /.3 y ®/�f in accordance with GL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. • 20 @ Srmr',1nx S'rtt:_ET SAL[ M, A1,SsaCtUvE:Ts 01970 - PxoNr-.978.6195685 Pax 978.740.0404 • n,�au�s.�l.rntco-:�r CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 DEC 10 P 5 08 FILE 0 NOTICE OF MEETINGCITY CLERK,SALEK M.45S. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,December 17,2015 at 7:00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • December 3,2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC • Description: The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on January 7, 2016 for a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a mull-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. • This notice posted on "Official Bulle 'QQ oard' City Hall, Salem, Mass. on DEC 10 at S.'0,P 741 in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for December 17,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 • Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES,INC. Description: A Continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Pernut per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS V. ADJOURNMENT Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A 5 18-25 and City Ordinance,(2-2028 through 2-2033. • • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 W W W.SALEM.COM Qy��Co � • 5/ � .: CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS c DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND 9� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ��MINB KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner DATE: December 10, 2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting — December 17, 2015 Please find the following in the dropbox file: ➢ Agenda for December 17, 2015 regular meeting ➢ Planner's Memo ➢ 401 Bridge St. (Gateway Center) — Presentation from December 3, 2015 • —Continuance Request ➢ Almeda — Opinion from City Solicitor — Opinion from the Applicant's Attorney — Public Comment ➢ Clark Avenue — Staff Comments — Stormwater Peer Review Comments ➢ Draft Minutes — December 3, 2015 I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 3, 2015 II. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC I have not received new materials for this project. A copy of the presentation from the December 3, 2015 meeting is included in your dropbox. • City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—12/10/2015 Page 2 of 4 • The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing for the Gateway Center project to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on January 7, 2016. 2. ALMEDA STREET This is a continuation of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. According to the applicant, the lots are dimensionally pre-existing nonconforming lots along an accepted public way that is currently unpaved. The City Building Commissioner has determined that Lot 116 and Lot 117 of Map 14 have merged. As reference, your dropbox contains a memorandum from Beth Rennard, the City Solicitor which outlines her legal opinion that the two lots have merged. The Applicant's Attorney has provided a rebuttal to the City Solicitor's legal opinion, which is also located in your dropbox. The Applicant's Attorney is planning on providing the City Solicitor and the Building Commissioner documentation to demonstrate that the lots have not merged. If the Building Commissioner finds compelling evidence for him to determine that the lots have not merged, then the lots would be considered pre-existing non- • conforming lots and the Planning Board could take action on the subdivision. However, if the Building Commissioner does not find the additional materials provided by the applicant as compelling evidence that the lots have not merged, his current opinion will stand. A subdivision of the merged lots would result in two non-conforming properties in respects to the lot size and dimensional requirements. In order for the Planning Board to approve the subdivision that results in non-conforming lots, the Zoning Board of Appeals would first have to approve an appeal of the Building Commissioner's opinion, or approve any necessary variances for the lots to be considered conforming. The applicant could apply for one of the above mentioned options with Zoning Board of Appeals for their January 20, 2016 regularly scheduled meeting. I also note that the 135 day deadline' for the subject project is January 9, 2016. Therefore, the Board must take final action at their next regularly scheduled meeting on January 7, 2016, unless the applicant requests an extension of the 135 day deadline. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law(M.G.L)Chapter 41,Section 81(U),the failure of a planning board either to take final action or to file with the city or town clerk a certificate of such action regarding the definitive plan submitted • by an applicant within 135 days after such submission, or such further time as may be agreed upon at the written request of the applicant,shall be deemed to be an approval thereof. City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—12/10/2015 Page 3 of 4 Please find the public comment from an abutter dated November 3`d in your dropbox. 3. CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) A Subdivision and Cluster Development was approved for 25 lots in 2008 (herein referred to as Chapel Hill). The Chapel Hill decision is located in your dropbox for reference. The Chapel Hill decision has since expired. The primary difference between the proposed plan and the Chapel Hill project is the new roadway layout. A Stormwater Management Report was prepared by Williams Sparages, dated September 24, 2015. The comments from New England Civil Engineering Corp. (NECE), the peer reviewer of the Stormwater Management Report, can be found in your dropbox. I have not yet received the applicant's response to the peer review comment letter. The applicant will be providing a presentation on the landscaping plan and on the Stormwater Report at the December 17th meeting. Bill Ross, the peer reviewer from NECE will be in attendance. The applicant has met with the City Engineer and the Planning Department to discuss the project and the offsite improvements that were included as conditions in the Chapel Hill Decision. The applicant is working on responses to • comments from the City Engineer, including the following: • The Chapel Hill approval included a condition that required the applicant to perform an infiltration and inflow identification and removal program for the approximate 2,700 linear foot sewer system. o The applicant is working on this. It is expected that the applicant will removal all extraneous infiltration and inflow that is cost effective up to approximately $120,000 (based on the original cost estimate of $100,000 with a 2% inflation rate for each year since). The infiltration inflow program includes evaluating the pump station across from Highland Avenue. o The City Engineer has also informed the applicant that in lieu of completing the work, they could pay for the cost of the removing the extraneous infiltration and inflow and the City would complete the work. • Since the Chapel Hill Decision was approved, the City has made some offsite improvements at the intersection of Clark Avenue and Clark Street, including resurfacing the road. o The applicant is planning on evaluating the current conditions and preparing a plan that will propose what work is still outstanding. Said plan will be reviewed by the City Engineer. • The project engineer has informed staff that a memorandum will be • submitted to the City Engineer with an analysis of the previous traffic improvement plan and safety mitigation measures. City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—12/10/2015 Page 4 of 4 • The City Engineer and the project applicant will reach out to the owner of • 1 Clark Avenue, the parcel with the large rock that causing a disruption the line of sight around the bend of Clark Avenue. The rock straddles public property and the public right-of-way. o Rather than providing the City with funds to remove the rock, the Applicant has offered to remove the rock, provided that the owner of 1 Clark Avenue provides permission for the private portion of the rock. • Per the request of the Fire Department, the applicant has scheduled a fire flow test for Thursday, December 17tH The applicant has submitted a Notice of Intent to the Conservation Commission. A Conservation Commission hearing is scheduled for tonight, December 10, 2015 at 6:30pm, to discuss the area of the project that is subject to the Wetlands Protection Act, MGL c.131§40 and Salem Wetlands Protection & Conservation Ordinance. III. OLDINEW BUSINESS IV. ADJOURNMENT • • ,��coNotPA� 5v, ; City of Salem - Meeting Sign-In Sheet tb=., a1.&t �"`''�c, tQ Board V\anv � ►1� :G�MPNC ppC�/ Date IL Name )) Mailing Address a Phone # E-mail �T 37 Clltr� St semen. �f?�7ys5�6b6 4La1jjo_ Chet Page of City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 17, 2015 • Page 1 of 6 City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday, December 17,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street,Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting at 7:14 pm. Roll Call Those present were: Ben Anderson, Chair, Matt Veno,Vice Chair, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Noah Koretz and Carole Hamilton.Absent: Helen Sides Also present:Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner,and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes December 3,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by the Planning Board members. • Motion and Vote:Carole Hamilton made o motion to approve the December 3, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes,seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with five(5)in favor and none(0)opposed Regular Agenda Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET(Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Chair Anderson advised the applicant has requested both a continuance to the next regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on January 7, 2016, and also to extend the deadline for action to January 25, 2016. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to extend the deadline for action to January 15, 2016, seconded by Carole Hamilton. The vote was unanimous with five (5) in favor(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to continue the public hearing to January 7, 2016, seconded by Carole Hamilton. The vote was unanimous with five (5) in favor(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 17, 2015 Page 2 of 6 • Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25,Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for the petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Chair Anderson advised the applicant has requested a continuance until January 7, 2016. • ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to continue the public hearing to Januory 7, 2016, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with six (6) in favor (Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Location: CLARK AVENUE(Map 6, Lots 7,8 and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six(26) residential lots. Atty Joseph Correnti, 63 Federal Street,Salem, presented for the applicant. Other presenters included: • Rich Williams; Civil Engineer; Williams & Sparages, 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton MA 01949. • Nick Meninno, president Meninno Construction,76 Oakville Street, Lynn 01905. • Doug Jones, LeBlanc Jones landscape Architects,535 Albany Streets#5A, Boston, MA 02118 • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 17, 2015 • Page 3 of 6 Documents and Exhibitions: • Written response to New England Civil Engineering Stormwater peer review dated December 7, 2015 • Updated Proposed Drainage Improvement Plan dated December 16, 2015 • Updated Index Plan dated December 7, 2015 • Landscape Renderings (3 sheets) Entry Planting Plan, Entry Perspective&Plant Images on Clarke Avenue. After an introduction by Atty Correnti, Rich Williams opened the presentation to update the Board on the engineering issues. Mr. Williams advised he has a prepared response to the stormwater peer review, dated December 7, 2015. Mr. Williams reported he had a meeting and conference call with Mr. Ross and the applicant's engineering firm to review their comments but Mr. Ross has not seen their written response yet. Chair Anderson advised that the Board will wait for a response from Mr. Ross before moving into deliberations on the stormwater review project. I Mr. Williams informed the board that their project team had met with the City Engineer and Amanda Chiancola to talk about some of the offsite improvements that were proposed as part of the original (Chapel Hill) approval. • Updated set of plans distributed by Mr. Williams(see document list above). • o As part of the prior decision, there was a drainage plan for the intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue. Presented tonight is an update of those plans because conditions have changed due to road work done by the City. • There were previously low spots on the northerly side of Clark Street and at intersection of Clark Ave and Clark Street on the southerly side. The City repaved Clark Street and super elevated portions of the street so that it flows from north to south across the road down the gutter into the catch basin. • Two locations at the southerly intersection were not corrected, so there continues to be a puddle on the south side up the street towards the catch basin that is being discharged to. The revised plan distributed tonight incorporates the existing conditions and corrects the drainage issues that exist at that location. Mr. Williams has discussed this with the City Engineer he seemed to be on board with the concept, but the City Engineer has not reviewed the plan yet. o Prior approval included a condition for the applicant to study the sewer system that collects sewer from their project, Clark Avenue, Clark Street and a section of Barns. It has been requested that they look at that system and try to find enough infiltration to offset the flow from the proposed project so the net effect is no additional flow to the pump system. • Mr. Meninno advised they have contracted National Water Main to perform and II study to clean and video the sewer lines. They anticipate it will be complete after the holidays. The sharp corner on Clark Avenue with the boulder is being reviewed to come up with a solution to • improve site lines. Nick Meninno advised they are prepared to remove the boulder to improve the site City of Salem–Planning Board Meeting Minutes–December 17, 2015 Page 4 of 6 • lines and repair the sidewalk after that work is done.The City Engineer is coordinating with the abutter, as most of the boulder lies on the abutter's property. Mr. Meninno advised the City Engineer has requested a pressure and flow test on the water lines; it will be done at 10pm tonight (December 17). They do not anticipate changes since the pressure and flow test that was done in 2007 for the previous project. Continuing his presentation, Mr. Williams advised another topic of discussion is the matter of the walking trails and open space, and whether there would be access to open space in parcel 2. At the Conservation Commission meeting they had agreed to propose a walking path that would allow access to Open Space 2. He reviewed the walking path plan and access identified on the updated Topographic Plan dated 12/7/2015.: • The proposed path to Open Space 1 will allow access from Clark Avenue and another from Woodlands Road, and at the end of the cul-de-sac. • The new trail to Open Space 2 will be accessed from the end of the circle through lot 27. • A condition would be needed to reroute the trail in the event there is any development on lot 27. Board Discussion of Engineering Update • Chair Anderson asked if the open space meets the minimum standard of 20%. Mr. Williams advised the standard is exceeded with 50% open space, not including site 27. He noted the requirement is that at least 50% of the 20% open space standard must be located outside of • wetlands areas and slopelands;that calculation will provided to the staff planner. • Mr. Koretz asked to know the proposed trail surface and how it will be maintained. Mr. Williams replied the proposed trail area is wooded; the applicant is open to wood mulch or crushed stone/stone dust path,either would work.Wood mulch would be more natural. o Atty Correnti advised once the cluster division association takes over the development the trails will be maintained by this entity. o Mr. Meninno advised the Conservation Commission had asked that the applicant's landscape architect provide professional assistance in planning the trail in the least invasive manner, also taking into account abutter concerns. • Chair Anderson advised there are several issues raised in the staff letter, dated October 28, 2015. Atty Correnti advised these will be addressed in writing. Landscape Plan Mr. Williams invited Doug Jones, LeBlanc Jones Landscape Architects to continue with a presentation of the Landscape Plan. • Mr. Jones following up on the discussion of the walking trail. He offered that wood chip surface would have the least impact on the natural setting. Crushed gravel will require more disruption of existing root systems and a three inch stone is not walkable whereas crushed stone is squishy. So if the intent is to preserve the vegetation in the open space he recommends wood chip. • The Board also asked how much clearing is needed to create the path. Mr. Meninno advised minimal clearing of downed trees, little saplings and brush needs to be removed, he does not envision heavy equipment—all handwork. • There is a need to regrade in two(2) locations,the entrance from the street and the first section of path that accesses the storm water management. . City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 17, 2015 Page 5 of 6 There is an adjacent property to the regrading location. The sewer will be going through their property (there is a sewer easement). There will not be runoff onto the neighbor's property; it is designed to run into the basin. • Mr. Jones described the entryway landscaping at Clark Avenue and guided the Board through the design and plans. Street trees will be planted fifty (50) feet on center in the tree lawn between the curb and sidewalk. o The Board asked to know tree species selections and size; Mr. Jones replied these have not been finalized but red maples are appropriate, meeting the caliper standard required by Salem.There are existing honey locust street trees in the subdivision. o The Board noted trees will be a tight fit in a tree lawn only thirty (30) inches wide as the root balls of trees meeting the required size will be large. • Mr. Meninno advised the trees will be installed prior to the sidewalk, nevertheless it is tight. • Mr. Rieder asked whether the sidewalk will be asphalt on concrete, and noted that the City has a preference for concrete. o Mr. Mennino said asphalt is proposed as it is more flexible thus more forgiving to the root balls of the street trees. • Mr. Koretz asked for clarification regarding a third access point to the open space 1; Mr. Williams and Mr. Meninno clarified the question was regarding how the trail would work with the vegetation between the sidewalk and the neighboring property line. o Mr. Jones recommended the trail should access off the sidewalk rather than traverse the area for the new sewer easement. The Board concurred since the path off Clark Ave is a redundant path alongside the sidewalk. • Mr. Rieder suggested as the standards of the previously approved plan have been set aside it is an opportunity for the Board to stipulate materials for the path. • Mr. Rieder asked for clarification on the drainage easement between lots 1 and 2. They replied this is a drainage easement that will allow for maintenance vehicles but the surface will be grass, it will not be paved. • Ms. Yale asked to know where the project is in the approval process of the Conservation Commission. Mr. Correnti advised there is a site walk scheduled for early January and a further presentation to the Conservation Commission at the January meeting. • Mr. Veno asked to know the proximity of the subdivision to the quarry. Mr. Williams replied it is quite some distance, close to a mile. Chair Anderson opened the meeting to public. • Dennis Colbert 37 Clarke Street; asked to understand who ultimately bears responsibility for the maintenance of trails. If they become the responsibility of neighborhood association, what can the City do to require maintenance? Trails will be open to the public and he is concerned they will deteriorate over time. o Atty. Correnti advised the Planning Board is expected to stipulate maintenance plans as a condition of the permits, so the applicant will include this requirement in the cluster division association documents.The City has the ability to reach out to the association if there is a compliance problem. o Mr. Colbert advised the road will still have ice formation in the winter as water runs off the ledges onto the road, often in sheets. The drainage improvements will not correct • this problem of large ice patches. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 17, 2015 Page 6 of 6 • Polly Wilbert 7 Cedar Street; suggested that all over the City tree lawns are not wide enough and trees often fail. Would like to see trees positioned within the property line adjacent the sidewalk. o Mr. Rieder observed that if the trees remain in the tree lawn maintenance is the responsibility of the City rather than the individual property owners once the streets are accepted by the City. Chair Anderson summarized the current status of the project with regards to review by the Planning Board, noting that the stormwater peer review report rebuttal needs to be presented to Planning Board. Meanwhile the applicant is addressing issues that have been identified to date via a series of meetings with the City Engineer Dave Knowlton and the peer reviewer. Atty Correnti added the applicant continues to move forward addressing the open issues,with the hope that a draft decision might be appropriate at the end of January. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to continue the public hearing to January 7 2015, seconded by Noah Koretz. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor (Mr. Anderson Mr. Veno, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed Old/New Business None. Adjournment • Motion and Vote: Noah Koretz made a motion to adiourn the meeting seconded by Carole Hamilton The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor (Mr. Anderson Mr. Veno Mr. Rieder Ms Yale Mr. Griset, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 8:30pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: htto://www.salem.com/node/2186/minutes Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk Appl roved by the Planning Boardon XX/XX/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance § 2-2028 through §2-2033. • CITY OF SALEM „ PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,December 3, 2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair REVISED* MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 15, 2015 • November 19, 2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: *CLARK AVENUE (Map 6,Lots 7, 8, and 9) • Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: REVISED: The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on December 17, 2015 for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: A continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Pertnit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits • of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for December 3,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule • Gate at 28 Goodhue Street V. ADJOURNMENT Knowyour ti ghts under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A 5 18-25 and City Ordinance fl 2-2028 through 2-2033. • • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSE17S 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . WWW.SALEM.COM yb , CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,December 3, 2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 15, 2015 0 • November 19,2015 x N�ff lnT v, III. REGULARAGENDA -r Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Sir' eet (Map 15, Lot 305) w Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC ^ • Description: A continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Pemuts associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCQ Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North'River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Pemlits of the NRCC A Special Pemrit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. • City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for December 3,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST ' Description: A continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule • Gate at 28 Goodhue Street V. ADJOURNMENT Know)affnghts wderthe OpezM"LawM.G.L. c 30A § 18-25 and C4OrdimnxS 2-2028rlm*§2-2033. • This notice posted on "OffiG+� Bull tinjio 'rd" City Ball, Salem, Mass. onG at�• 3 �m in accordancr�/ ith MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. ON SM' SALLA,1, ti ,SS 01 S: 1:S 01970 Pttc;:ti 97R.6195fi8s I evx 978. 40.0404 • �-✓www.SAi}in^;.Cid\a CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS • q DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLFY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN Ci00NIN DUNCAN,AICD DIRECCOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner DATE: November 24, 2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting — December 3, 2015 Please find the following in the dropbox file: ➢ Agenda for December 3, 2015 regular meeting ➢ Planner's Memo ➢ 401 Bridge St. (Gateway Center) — Presentation from November 19, 2015 ➢ Clark Avenue • — Staff Comments — Stormwater Peer Review Comments ➢ Draft Minutes — October 15, 2015 — November 19, 2015 ➢ Draft 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 15, 2015 2. November 19, 2015 II. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use consisting of the construction of two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on • City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—11/25/2015 Page 2 of 3 the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and • landscape layout. The petitioner requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. A copy of the presentation from the October 15, 2015 meeting is included in your dropbox. As noted in the previous Planning Memo, the project went before the DRB on August 23, 2015. The applicant is currently working on responses to comments by the DRB and the Civil Engineer Peer Reviewer. Staff anticipates comments from the traffic peer reviewer FST following any site plan changes that may be proposed. Comments from the Civil Engineer Peer Reviewer, New England Civil Engineering (NECE), are included in your dropbox. 2. CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Continuation of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem • Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. A Subdivision and Cluster Development was approved for 25 lots in 2008 (herein referred to as Chapel Hill). The Chapel Hill decision is located in your dropbox for reference. The Chapel Hill decision has since expired. As noted in the application letter, the primary difference between the proposed plan and the Chapel Hill project is the new roadway layout. On October 28, 2015, 1 provided the applicant a letter (located in your dropbox) commenting on the conformance of the subject project to the cluster residential development standards. Since then, the City Engineer has requested that the applicant update the traffic study that was completed for the Chapel Hill subdivision, and submit the updated traffic study to the City Engineer for review. A Stormwater Management Report was prepared by Williams Sparages, dated September 24, 2015. The comments from New England Civil Engineering Corp. (NECE), the peer reviewer of the Stormwater Management Report, can be found in your dropbox. The petitioner is currently working on responding to the peer review comments. • City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—11/25/2015 Page 3 of 3 • III. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 1. 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule Please find the draft 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule that has been uploaded to your inbox for the Board discussion and vote on 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule. Please note that Planning Board meetings are held on the first and third Thursday of each month. The August meetings are typically cancelled to coincide with the City Council schedule. Also, the first meeting in October is typically cancelled. 2. 28 Goodhue Street (Gate) IV. ADJOURNMENT • • �ONi}tTq � City of Salem - Meeting Sign-In Sheet • � iv tro ioa Board }Planninc �DaRc( t,^iiNr r Date I Z / 3 / 2 c)i S Name Mailing Address Phone # E-mail � W C qtr o, lrAk-S� q7k 7yy-0% barqu,ejLma4 "AW.cor Page of City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 • Page 1 of 8 City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday, December 3,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting at 7:12 pm. Roll Call Those present were: Ben Anderson, Chair, Matt Veno, Vice Chair(partial), Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Noah Koretz and Carole Hamilton.Absent: None Also present:Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes October 15,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by the Planning Board members. Motion and Vote:Helen Sides made a motion to approve the October 15,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with seven (7)in favor and none(0)opposed • November 19,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by g the Planning Board members. Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to approve the November 19, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with seven(7) in favor and none (0) opposed. Regular Agenda Location: CLARK AVENUE(Map 6, Lots 7,8 and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six(26) residential lots. Chair Anderson advised the applicant has requested a continuance until the December 17, 2015 meeting. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to continue the public hearing to December 17, 2015, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor ( Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 Page 2 of 8 • Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25, Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street(Map 15,Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for the petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. • Documents and Exhibitions: Slide Presentation by Giles Ham, P.E.of Vanasse&Associates Atty Joseph Correnti, 63 Federal Street,Salem, presented for the applicant. Other presenters included: • Giles Ham, P.E., Managing Principal,Vanasse &Associates Inc., 35 New England Business Center Drive,Suite 140,Andover 01810(transportation impact assessment) • City peer-review services (in attendance for discussion,written peer-review to be presented at a future meeting). o Gary Hebert, Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, LLC; 5 Burlington Woods Dr. #f210, Burlington, 01803 Atty Correnti introduced Giles Ham of Vanasse & Associates, traffic consultants to the applicant. Mr. Ham provided an overview of the traffic study support by a slide presentation. Mr. Ham observed the current forecast for the current project with a mix of residents, retail and the Community Life Center (CLC) is 50% less than the traffic volume forecasted for the prior project approved for this site.The higher traffic estimates were based on the medical office building component which is no longer part of the plan.The revised plan for the site includes: • Right in/right out only driveway on Boston Street,without left-outs or left-ins. • Full access driveway on Bridge Street located as far from the Boston Street intersection as possible. • City of Salem–Planning Board Meeting Minutes–December 3, 2015 • Page 3 of 8 • The site location within a mile of the train station encourages use of public transportation,thus is an ideal site for multi-modal access. • The area generally has good pedestrian support with crosswalks at Boston/Bridge Street intersection. • Flint Street pedestrian crossing at Bridge Street identified as a location that is not safe for pedestrian and could be fixed. Referring to aerial photos in the presentation for illustration, Mr. Ham gave an overview of the existing traffic flow on the busy streets abutting the site; Boston and Bridge Streets as well as adjacent Flint Street. He indicated the location of all existing traffic signals,turning lanes and pedestrian crosswalks. Mr. Ham continued the presentation to discuss the traffic counts done at on Boston Street at the Bridge Street intersection, on Bridge Street at both the intersection with Bridge Street and with Flint Street. Counts were done in June 2015 and represent average conditions. Peak is during the hours of 730- 830am and 5-6pm. • Boston Street is the busier street with about 1600 cars/hour, Bridge Street a bit less with about 1300/cars per hour. • Accident data reviewed (5 years) provided by MASS DOT: o Boston at Bridge Street intersection, about 60 accidents in 5 years, exceeds the average rate for the state, a lot of rear-end accidents and angled accidents as cars stop for pedestrians. o The Board requested clarification of an angled accident; Mr. Ham described this with • the example of a car southbound (toward Salem) on Boston Street turning left onto Bridge street and encounters northbound through traffic on Boston Street. Site lines of driveways were reviewed and are considered to be safe. The federal highway standard was used;starting at a point of 14.5-feet from the roadway edge, and measure the site line in each direction. The minimum requirement with traffic at 30 MPH is 200 feet, and for traffic at 40 MPH is 305 feet. • Site distance of proposed driveways exceeds required minimums and is safe in terms of sight lines. Traffic generators for the plan are based standard manual for the three proposed components: apartments, retail and the Community Life Center. • Apartments- weekday morning approximately a vehicle per minute – mostly existing, which is not significant • Total daily trips forecast 1,925 less than half of prior proposal. o Prior proposal was over 4,000 trips per day—driven by medical office building. • Reduced by pedestrian and transit users to a net of 1636 trips per day. • Most of the traffic is forecast to utilize Boston Street to access this new development; about 35%of the new traffic will utilize Bridge Street. • Site generated traffic during peak hours is forecasted to add an additional 30 vehicles per hour, which is not significant. Recommendations for traffic mitigation: • Optimize Traffic signal timing at Boston and Bridge Street to better allocate timing 0 Provide pedestrian phase to the traffic lights. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 Page 4 of 8 • • Install pedestrian count down heads on traffic lights. • Right in/right-out only driveway on Boston Street driveway. • Optimize traffic signal timing at Flint and Bridge Streets. • Full access driveway at Bridge (located as far from Boston/Bridge intersection as possible) with lighting so the driveway is easily seen. The Board asked Mr. Ham to speak to mitigating volume building on Boston Street northbound (towards Peabody from Salem), as far back as Federal Street. He stated this could be mitigated by signal timing at the Boston/Bridge Street intersection. Mr. Hamm advised the site team is looking at improved pedestrian connections within the site in response to feedback received so far, including internal raised crosswalks. Board Discussion: • Ms. Sides raised a concern regarding Pope Street traffic that enters into Boston Street often creating a bottleneck. Should this be addressed with a "don't block the box' grid? How can we prevent this neighborhood from blocking Boston Street? If a grid is added it should not facilitate illegal left-turns where they are not supposed. Mr. Ham advised a Grid box could help but needs to be properly sized, not too big. • Gary Hebert (traffic peer reviewer) agreed the Pope Street intersection is a problem. Traffic does clear out on the signal, but a "don't block the box"grid might be helpful. He recommended traffic counts for this intersection. o Mr. Ham advised a supplemental evening count at this intersection would be done. • o The Board that traffic starts sooner than 4:OOpm thus requested these counts be done for the window of 2-6pm and Mr. Ham agreed. o Mr. Hebert advised he has no formal peer review presentation for this meeting; the written report is in development. He noted the Pope Street intersection is a concern. He is also concerned the site will be a cut-through from Boston Street northbound to Bridge Street; he emphasized it is important the site plan discourage traffic cut-throughs. o Mr. Hebert also spoke to the northbound lanes as Boston Street meets Bridge Street and the discussions over two (2) vs. three (3) northbound lanes on Boston Street. The critical movement is the through traffic on Boston Street(highest volume). o Mr. Herbert noted that in the past the though was to add a third lane to the Bridge Street approach from Boston. One lane for Goodhue, one lane for Boston and one lane for Bridge. However, critical movement is straight through traffic. o Adding a third lane to Bridge Street might not be helpful in reducing the queue for through traffic. He observed that signage for the 3-lane scenario to control the lane for Goodhue Street and the lane for Bridge Street in addition to the through lane would be difficult and likely just cause more driver confusion, and there appear to be other safety alternative that could be done instead. He also observed any widening of the intersection increases crossing distances for pedestrians so other solutions might be better overall. He has not yet formulated a professional opinion with regard to northbound lanes, but will provide an evaluation after receiving and reviewing the site plan. o He is also looking to see if the traffic data indicates any increase in traffic on Federal Street or other adjacent residential streets. He is also wanting to see if there are any changes to the site plan, particularly driveway locations. • City of Salem—Plannin Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 • Page 5 of 8 • Ms. Sides observed the southbound Boston Street traffic from Peabody toward the Bridge Street intersection is dangerous for pedestrians. The street is very narrow and cars are right on top of pedestrians making this a very dangerous crossing. Mr. Hebert agreed there is a pinch point near the Flynntan site and Dunkin Donuts where the roadway narrows which is a concern. o Collectively the Board asked Mr. Hebert and Mr. Ham to look into how we improve this pedestrian crossing and make it safer. Possibly relocate the traffic light, or compress the intersection. The Board is interested in hearing alternatives to give pedestrians a safer crossing here. • Mr. Ham noted there is not a crosswalk over Proctor Street adjacent Walgreens and this intersection. o Mr. Hebert noted that this intersection needs a crosswalk. The Board collectively agreed this should be added as part of the project. • Mr. Rieder asked to understand how much flexibility there is in selecting the driveway location on the Bridge Street side of the site. o Mr. Ham advised that optimum traffic management places the driveway as far as possible from Boston Street. The curve in Bridge Street as you approach Boston Street will impede sight distances. He advised that if there is a desire to relocate the driveway the site line distances would need to be measured again. Chair Anderson opened the meeting to public comment. • Jane Arlander, 93 Federal Street; Agreed Pope Street is a problem. There is also a flooding issue at Proctor and Pope Street. All of Boston Street adjacent the Gateway Center site is flood-prone • due to the surrounding topography. Concerned that Pope Street queuing is on the opposite side of the site driveway on Boston Street and will create traffic conflicts and cut-through traffic in Gateway Center from Pope Street. o Chair Anderson and Mr. Ham advised the driveway/curbcut configuration will prohibit this via right-in, right-out possibly with a triangle island between. o Ms. Arlander followed up to state she is concerned about left turns from Bridge Street into the site;that queuing on Bridge Street for the light could impede access. o Adding a third lane on Boston Street to Bridge Street may increase traffic on Federal Street. • Meg Twohey, 122 Federal Street; asked to know more about plans for sidewalks. The current Bridge Street sidewalk is not usable (utility poles in the middle of it), it is very narrow and too close to traffic. Is this sidewalk being redone?Are utilities going underground? • Chair Anderson advised the poles along the sidewalk belong to the utility company. • Atty Correnti advised these utility poles are problematic. They are high voltage lines, controlled by National Grid. The developer has no control over this but is in favor of seeing the power lines go underground. A lobbying effort to National Grid is needed to persuade them to do this work. • Mr. Rieder observed the poles stop midway opposite the self-storage facility. The corner of Boston and Bridge Streets adjacent the the site does not have these utility poles. • Atty Correnti advised the developer will present more information on the sidewalks. • o Ms. Twohey asked if the land for a third lane on northbound Boston Street will be preserved on the property regardless of whether built now or not. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 Page 6 of 8 • • Atty Correnti said yes, setbacks will provide the land so it will be available to the city. o Ms. Twohey advised the Board the purpose of tonight's meeting was not disseminated in a timely manner. Neighbors wish to know when the Planning Board plans to discuss the special permits. o Director of Planning Lynn Duncan sought to clarify exactly what agenda details the public attendees were especially interested in and confirmed with Ms. Twohey they want to be advised in advance when the Planning Board will discuss the findings for the NRCC. • Ms. Twohey clarified the neighborhood is extremely interested in attending the Planning Board meeting when the Board reaches this point in their deliberations as their interpretation of the NRCC Master Plan differs from how the City Planning Department interprets the plan. • Atty Correnti advised the applicant position is that these specific project elements cannot be communicated in advance. The flow of information between the Board and thea applicant would be impeded if the agenda is defined Pp P so narrowly as to limit the discussion to specific aspects of a project. • Ms. Duncan advised all parties attempt to do their best in communicating the agenda. When the Board discusses findings they will attempt to signal the public. Interested members of the public are always welcome to contact Planning Department staff for information. • Polly Wilbert, 7 Cedar Street; concerned about the site elevation in relation to the sidewalk. Is the entire site raised? If so, she is concerned that cars turning in at the Bridge Street driveway • will be going uphill, and thus visibility is impeded due to the increased grade. She is also concerned about snow obstructing visibility for drivers turning in/out of the Bridge Street driveway. She asked to know the distance from the current driveway location to the "elbow', that is,the curve in Bridge Street as a driver approaches Boston Street. o Atty Correnti advised the current elevation is a pre-load, portions of the site will be raised. o Ms. Wilbert restated the question, is the exit a ramp? o Atty Correnti advised the developer will have engineers answer this at next meeting. o Mr. Ham advised the distance is an estimated 600 feet from the driveway to the elbow or curve in Bridge Street. This is why the driveway is situated so far from the Bridge/Boston intersection. He will verify and distance it will be presented at the next meeting. • Tim Jenkins, 18 Broad Street; asked to know how building heights are measured. Is the measurement taken from the pre-loaded elevation or some other method? o Atty Correnti advised the engineer will report on this at a later meeting. • Lou Sirianni, 6 Botts Court; asked about the process and schedule the applicant is pursuing as the project moves through the permitting process. Will the architects be making a presentation to the Planning Board? o Atty Correnti advised yes, the applicant is working a dual track with the DRB (Design Review Board) and the Planning Board. They hope to present revisions to the DRB in January. DRB makes their recommendation to the Planning Board. o Mr. Sirriani asked if there is a rearranged site plan based on public feedback the applicant has received to date. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 Page 7 of 8 Atty Correnti advised work is being done and will be presented to the DRB. The applicant is listening and trying to take public feedback into account. o Mr. Sirriani restated his objection to the CLC location as initially presented. It is poor positioning; the building needs to be repositioned on the site. A simple solution is to turn the building 90 degrees. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to continue the public hearing to December 17, 2015, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with eight(8) in favor(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Ms.Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. [Old/New—Business • 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule Chair Anderson advised the draft schedule prepared by the planning department staff is consistent with the 1s`and 3rd Thursday schedule used in previous years. He called for any requested changes;the Board indicated no changes are needed at this time. Motion and Vote: Bill Griset made a motion to approve the draft schedule as presented by staff, seconded by Carole Hamilton. The vote was unanimous with seven(7)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. • • Gate at 28 Goodhue Street Staff planner Amanda Chiancola reported the post has been removed from the common pathway. • Chair Anderson reported that written notice has been received from Susan St. Pierre Consulting Services on behalf of Salem Willows Yacht Club of a Chapter 91 license application. • CPC(Community Preservation Committee)appointment Chair Anderson reported that Helen Sides has resigned her appointment as the Planning Board representative on the CPC.After discussion, it was agreed Matt Veno would serve as the representative. Motion and Vote: Ben Anderson made a motion to appoint Matt Veno to the role of Planning Board representative on the Community Preservation Committee, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with eight 8) in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yales, Mr. Kortez, Mr. Veno and Ms. Hamilton). Adjournment Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made o motion to adiourn the meeting, seconded by Carole Hamilton. The vote was unanimous with eight (8) in favor (Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 8:30pm. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—December 3, 2015 Page 8 of 8 is For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/node/2186/minutes/2015 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk Approved by the Planning Board on 12/15/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance § 2-2028 through§2-2033. • • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 NOV I l P 12: 50 FILE li NOTICE OF MEETINGCIT;Y CLEFi'4„ SLEM, 1 �s You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,November 19, 2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair REVISED-' MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 15, 2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: REVISED: The applicant has requested a continuance of the public • hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on December 3, 2015 for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: A continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow • ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Pernut per Sec. 6.0 to be City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for November 19,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 • amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mined-use residential/retad on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. Description: The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on December 17, 2015 for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule • Crate at 28 Goodhue Street • Yin Yu Tang Transformer V. ADJOURNMENT Know)acn-rights wrlerthe OpenM"LawM.G.L. c 30A § 18-25 and City Oxliwnx5 2-2028 ibm#g 2-2033. This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on NOV 17 2015 at A?,-5Z P" in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. 20 WASF.NGION Sra r7 5ALzM, MASSACHUs :-rs 01970 P11 ;NE 9;8.619.5685 FAX 978.7 0.0404 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015NOV 12 P3; 1b filE 0 NOTICE OF MEETING CITY Ct.FRK, SALEM, MASS, You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,November 19,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 15,2015 III. REGULARAGENDA Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC • Description: A continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCG A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" • City Hall, Salem, Mass. on NOV 12 2015 at 3:1& PM in accordance lith MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. , City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for November 19,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES,INC. Description: The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on December 17, 2015 for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule • Gate at 28 Goodhue Street • Yin Yu Tang Transformer • V. ADJOURNMENT lfn owytw rights wrier the C)enMreling LawM.GL. c 30A Q 18-25 and City OAnarxe g 2-2028 tura o g 2-2033. .20 WMHING_ON SM 1-r SAUH-% ' I SSACH .8 rS 01970 - PHONE 978.6.19.%85 FAX 978:740.04.04 �'Y-W'\+,SALFNI,Mkl r �,AcONWTgq� CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS • `�� r = DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DoNCAN,AICP DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner DATE: November 12, 2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting — November 19, 2015 Please find the following in the dropbox file: ➢ Agenda for November 19, 2015 regular meeting Planner's Memo ➢ 401 Bridge St. (Gateway Center) — Presentation from October 15, 2015 — New Public Comment • ➢ 14 & 16 Almeda St. — Memo from City Solicitor, dated October 7, 2015 — Opinion from Applicant's attorney, dated November 2, 2015 — Continuance Request to December 17, 2015 — New Public Comment ➢ Clark Avenue — Blasting Information — Opinion from City Solicitor, dated October 15, 2007 — Stormwater Report ➢ Draft Minutes — October 15, 2015 ➢ Draft 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 15, 2015 II. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET LLC Continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan • Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits r City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum— 11/12/2015 Page 2 of 5 associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District • (NRCC) to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use consisting of the construction of two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. The petitioner requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. A copy of the presentation from the October 15th meeting is included in your dropbox. The applicant is currently working on responses to comments by the DRB and the Civil Engineer Peer Reviewer. As noted in the previous Planning Memo, the project went before the DRB on August 23, 2015 and Staff anticipates comments from the traffic peer reviewer FST following any site plan changes that may be proposed. Comments from the Civil Engineer Peer Reviewer, New England Civil Engineering (NECE), are included in your dropbox. • 2. 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) The applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to December 17, 2015 for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. According to the applicant, the lots are dimensionally pre-existing nonconforming lots along an accepted public way that is currently unpaved. A memorandum from the City Solicitor, Beth Rennard, to Thomas St. Pierre, the Zoning Enforcement Officer/City Building Commissioner is in the dropbox folder. Based on the review of the record by the City Solicitor, Lots and 116 and 117 of Map 14 have merged, creating one lot. The Zoning Enforcement Officer has determined that the lots of merged. Staff is anticipating that the applicant will either apply for variances with the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), or file an appeal of the Building Commissioner's decision to the ZBA on November 25, 2015 for the December 16, 2015 regularly scheduled ZBA meeting. Should the ZBA take action to approve the applicant's appeal or variance that night, the project would be ready for the regularly scheduled Planning Board the following night, on the December 17, 2015. • City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—11/12/2015 Page 3 of 5 • 3. CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Continuation of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. A Subdivision and Cluster Development was approved for 25 lots in 2008 (herein referred to as Chapel Hill). The Chapel Hill decision is located in your dropbox for reference. The Chapel Hill decision has since expired. As noted in the application letter, the primary difference between the proposed plan and the Chapel Hill project is the new roadway layout. Status of Department Comments City Building Commissioner The City of Salem Building Commissioner has expressed concern regarding the future development of lot 27 as it is partially zoned institutional. An opinion on this matter from the City Solicitor for the Chapel Hill project has been uploaded • to your dropbox. Based on the Assistant City Solicitor's opinion, Lot 27 cannot be developed as an industrial lot with access from Clark Avenue through the residentially zoned portion of the lot. Board of Health The Board of Health reviewed the subdivision application at its regular meeting on October 13, 2015 and voted to issue a list of conditions that must be met. The conditions are enclosed. Fire Prevention Per the Fire Prevention Officer's comment there is an eight inch main providing water to the project area. The Fire Prevention would like to see a hydraulic report done by a third party source agreed upon by the Fire Department defining what is needed for firefight capabilities for the subdivision. The undefined lot should be taken into consideration in this report with the maximum water supply requirements considered for potential development of the property. City Engineer In response to the Fire Department's comment, the City Engineer has recommended that the developers engineer review the results of the hydraulic • testing and provide an opinion which will be peer reviewed for the City. City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—11/12/2015 Page 4 of 5 i The Chapel Hill project included offsite drainage improvements at the intersection of Clark Street and Clark Avenue. The intent of said improvements is to remove extraneous flows equal to or greater than the future flows from the development. The drainage improvements also necessitated a pavement replacement program to the following limits from the center of the Clark Street/Clark Avenue Intersection: 240 feet easterly towards Barnes Road, and 30 feet westerly towards Highland Avenue. The City Engineer has recommended that the proposed project be subject to the same offsite improvements. A traffic study had been previously prepared for the Chapel Hill Project. Per the request of the Engineering Department, the petitioner is currently working on updating the traffic study with current traffic data to ensure the Clark Street and Barnes Road intersections have the necessary capacity for the proposed traffic volumes. The traffic study will be reviewed by the City Engineer. Conservation Commission The Conservation Agent has determined that the project will require an order of conditions from the Conservation Commission and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with Section 37 of the Salem Ordinances. New England Civil Engineer Corp. has been hired to conduct a peer review of the Stormwater • Management Report submitted by the applicant. III. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 1. 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule Please find the draft 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule that has been uploaded to your inbox for the Board discussion and vote on 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule. 2. 28 Goodhue Street (Gate) In accordance with Condition No. 10 c. of the February 20, 2007 Decision of the Salem Planning Board Site Plan ReviewMetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit, North River Canal, a four foot tall Industrial Ornamental steel fence by Ameristar Fence products was installed. The fence is located between the shared use path and canal edge, for the length of the shared use path. A gate was installed at the entrance to the multiuse path without the benefit of a permit. The gate has since been removed; however, the post for the gate is intact. Given that the post does not affect the use of the pathway, it is not in violation of the approved project. Thus, there does not appear to be a nexus to • City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum —11/12/2015 Page 5 of 5 require that the post be removed. Further, the removal of the post would result in damage to the sidewalk, which would be costly and time consuming to repair. 3. Yin Yu Tang (Transformer) The transformer in question at the Peabody Essex Museum Yin Yu Tang house was installed to power the museum during the construction of the museum's expansion. The Peabody Essex Museum had an approved plan to expand. As part of that approval, a temporary transformer was installed to provide power to the museum during construction. The construction project was put on hold, but the museum is currently receiving power from the transformer. The museum will continue to receive power until such time the expansion (or an amended expansion) is complete. IV. ADJOURNMENT • City of Salem - Meeting Sign-In Sheet y. vo i '7qq Board Ficivin ih�l 13oaRGQ Date I / Iq / 2015 Nam Mailin�pg,�A�`d�dress Phone # E-mail VJ4_,ve �� b.4Pi 93 FPd,,,) SL 9'78-7y(/- 0916^ bar u� ald ,/Con h� �y ✓� EWe�rfi/c 3 l�Q � /,�� If 9��- � y�-aisS cL��y �',�rsW co", 92k--2-2-3- 5�� U`5�ehr��7r,l� �Gm4,L,�.,! e ✓ cs� I Y S �s S = S� 9?hgZi�Y/ia k�unctco(9s, a M • Geo ij r I �r�� e 97�-J10-7�1� e �rr✓�,� r ;�.col�i Page of City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 1 of 9 • City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday, November 19,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street,Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting at 7:07 pm. Roll Call Those present were: Ben Anderson, Chair, Matt Veno, Vice Chair, Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Noah Koretz and Carole Hamilton.Absent: Bill Griset. Also present:Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner,and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes October 15,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes Chair Anderson tabled review of the minutes until the next meeting, December 3, 2015. Regular Agenda • Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET(Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Chair Anderson reported that the applicant has requested a continuance to the December 17, 2015 regular scheduled meeting. Chair Anderson noted that public comment had been received, but it will be read into the record on December 17,2015. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to continue the public hearing to December 17, 2015, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor(Mr. Anderson Mr. Veno, Ms.Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Location: CLARK AVENUE(Map 6, Lots 7,8 and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots. • City of Salem—Planning Board , Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 2 of 9 Chair Anderson reported the applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing. • ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Noah Koretz made o motion to continue the public hearing to December 3, 2015, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor ( Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Ms.Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Vale, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 2S, Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for the petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the • 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Documents and Exhibitions: Slide Presentation entitled"Environmental Factors Gateway Center,Salem, MA". Atty Joseph Correnti, 63 Federal Street,Salem,presented for the applicant.Other presenters included: • Frank Vetere P.E., Associate Principal, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc., 372 Merrimac Street, Newburyport 01950. Mr.Vetere is the LSP(licensed site professional)for this project. Atty Correnti advised since the last meeting the Planning Board had a site visit to better understand the specifics including the property line with property owners on Federal Street. The City peer reviewers continue to work with the applicant's experts. This appearance before the Board is to address environmental factors around the site. Mr. Vetere is the LSP (licensed site professional) for this project and will be reviewing the history in detail. Mr. Vetere introduced himself and noted that he has been working on this project since 2010. Mr. Vetere used a slide presentation to review the history of the site. Before presenting the specifics of this site, he reviewed the role and regulations that govern the work of LSPs. The role of the LSP is a • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 3 of 9 • profession that was established in 1993. The role of an LSP is to assess sites to determine if the site complies with regulations, and to determine what is necessary to bring a site to a condition of no significant risk to the users of that property. LSPs are empowered by the state to make decisions on cleanup, e.g. whether a site is closed, needs more work, less work and what limitations are required to make a site useable. Everything the LSP does must comply with State Regulations and are subject to an audit by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) within 5 years. A State Board regulates the conduct of LSPs and work done by LSPs, thus they are held to a high professional standard. LSP activities include: • Define contamination • Determine work needed to clean up a site • Ensure actions taken to address contaminated property: o Comply with Massachusetts regulations o Protect public health,safety,welfare and the environment o Must comply with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP). The MCP developed guidance/regulations for risk assessments. LSP is subject to said regulations o LSP opinions are subject to an audit process by the state Department of Environmental Protections. ❑ DEP typically audits when there is an AUL on a site • Before 1993 site cleanup meant residential standards, residential standards with groundwater. However, in industrial cities such as downtown Salem, no one is drinking groundwater. These were overly stringent requirements,so the MCP uses "risk based"cleanup. They look at soils and groundwater are evaluated based on; 1) accessibility, 2) frequency, and 3) intensity of the use at the particular site. Then they evaluate three characteristics of groundwater; 1) is it a drinking water resource, 2) will there a building be constructed over a volatile organic compound which could cause vapor intrusion, 3) and is there an issue where surface water is contaminated. Indoor air is the key issue at the Gateway site. The acceptance criteria are based on the usage and restrictions you can put on the usage to comply. If you do put limitations it would have to be recorded with the deed as an "area use limitation" (AUL). You can build on a site that does not meet the unrestricted standards with an AUL. The AUL lists what is permitted,what is prohibited and the obligations of the owner.There are 57 sites with AULs in Salem. In 2010 there were 86 AULs in Salem. A number of AUL sites is normal for a city with an industrial history, and there is a vehicle to clean up those sites so that they can be usable. Mr. Vetere shifted his presentation to focus on the specifics of this site. He pointed out the approximate location on the site with the AUL using an aerial photo of the site. The subject property was a wetland, and then it was filled in at some point (probably around 1890). There were tanneries on this site from 1890-1916. Thee ceased operations in the 1990s. Environmental history of the site: • r City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 4 of 9 • No.4 fuel oil tank removed in 1992, No.4 is heavier than No. 2 as it is more viscous. • No. 2 fuel oil tank and contaminated soil removed in 1994 • Subsequent studies found groundwater contamination and residual soil contamination • GZA issued an AUL in 1999, risk assessment was performed to support the AUL 0 2002 DEP audited the AUL.They questioned a 20'x20' area which became known as the hotspot o DEP audit in 2002 resulted in hot spot designation and an amended AUL • The AUL was modified to evaluate risk assessment of Senior Center o DEP audited the site again in 2004 and found no issues with the revised AUL Site activities: • Grade has been raised about 4-6 feet • High Rock excavated the hot spot and removed 60 tons of contaminated soil • Although not environmental, the soil is soft clay. So they had placed a surcharge on the soil to reload foundation;to result in a lower cost foundation • Imported 2-6 feet of soil for surcharge o Removed old building foundations 2015 Risk Assessments per LSP: • Completed a couple of months ago • Acceptable risks from soils for trespassers,children,construction, utility and facility workers • Suitable for multi-family residents if there is a Vapor Barrier o Vapor Barrier eliminates the possibility of vapor entering the building. It is very effective • on sites with higher concentrations of solvents than this site. • Considerations for contaminants: o Dermal contact (touching the soil) o Inhalation (breathing the soil) o Ingestion (eating the soil) • Removed hot spot designation with revised AUL in 2015 • Any construction work below a depth of three feet requires a health and safety plan, and soils management plan (to protect the risk to future construction workers and abutters in the area) • Allow adults and children to use the facilities with no risk to health safety or welfare. • Added additional measures including: o Installation of a vapor barrier and sub-slab venting system o Along with construction safeguards o Plan that determines which soils go off site,where they go and how they go offsite Most of what is there is historic fill comprised of coal ash. Coal ash was used as fill across Massachusetts from the mid-1800s until the mid-1900's. Ash alone is not a reportable site, it is considered background fill and contact with it must be limited—usually by burying it and covering it. Beryllium is an ongoing concern so six analyses were done finding 0.48ppm to 1.1ppm against a standard of 100ppm for unrestricted residential use. Beryllium is not a concern at this site due to the very low levels and steps taken to cover soil that may have low levels of contamination. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 5 of 9 • Mr. Rieder asked Mr. Vetere to clarify whether the six analyses are standard for how many areas of analysis must be done. Mr. Vetere explained that the level of analysis is determined by the LSP, who looks at the site history to determine what to look for. In the 1990s they did 6 borings based on the site history of what they used. Mr. Rieder asked where the borings are concentrated (under the building or outside the building footprint). Mr. Vetere stated that in the 1990s when the testing was done, there was not building, they were looking to close the site from a standpoint of an empty lot. But if he were testing now,from a risk standpoint he would test in the yard area since the inside of the building will be removed or covered. But all the soil removed will be tested anyway. LPConclusions • Adults and children may use the proposed facility without risk to health, safety and their welfare. • Ensuring safety via isolation. o Soil contamination will be isolated (originally about 3 feet below grade, now it is about 6 feet) • Ground water contamination will be isolated with vapor barrier. • Construction below groundwater requires HASP and soil management plan to protect construction workers and abutters. Board Discussion: • Board asked for specifics regarding excavation of the 20 X 20 foot hot spot. Mr. Vetere replied the excavation was ten (10) feet in depth. They permanently removed soil that was visibly • contaminated (going down ten feet) in the amount of 60 tons. • Board asked if foundations of the new building would go below 3-feet and enter the contamination zone. Mr. Vetere advised the new building will be on aggregate piers sunk into holes so no further soil will be removed or will come to the surface to establish the pilings. • Mr.Vetere clarified the final grade will be at elevation eleven (11),which is the base floor level. • The Board asked what the depth for safe exposure is. Mr. Vetere explained the DEP requires 3 feet if it is not paved. • The Board asked Mr. Vetere to provide a general overview of who hires him and the LSP requirements to the state. o The LSP is hired by the private property owner o The MCP has a phased approach. Report the site,then within a year must do complete a Phase I-define what is there via an initial risk assessment. At that point you could close the site with a permanent solution or determine more work is required; Phase II- more detailed evaluation. Characterize the site through a conceptual model of the site; Phase III- a remedial action plan, determined what are the options for the cleaning the site; Phase IV- remedy implementation plan where you design the system you will be using, e.g.groundwater treatment system. Phase V-remedy the operation, actual cleanup of the site. • Without extensions you have 5 years from reporting. • This site was closed in the 1990s but there was an AUL because residential was not proposed at the time. But work to clean up the site has been ongoing. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 6 of 9 • There are many different options to work on a site. In the scheme of things, this site is not • heavily contaminated. Chair Anderson read into the record written publicoomment received: • Lynda Coffill, Chairperson Council on Aging, 56 Belleview Avenue; in favor of changing the building orientation by 90 degrees but does not want this change to delay the project. Current plan does not offer enough handicapped spaces. New fencing should be installed. Low-impact lighting, facing down is important. Suggested the arch-diocese be approached to provide easement or a gift of land to access the property from Bridge or Flint Streets. • Gary Kinley, President Chestnut Street Associates; neutral position on the proposed Gateway Center and Community Life Center(CLC). • Barbara Cleary, 104 Federal Street; correction to minutes of 10/15/2015. First two sentences correct, then "People did not want to see big box residential standalone buildings in this area and the Master Plan and Zoning clearly reflect that. The "urban village" referred to on the Plan (the fold out 'Illustrative Plan") is on the Flynntan site and is clearly smaller scale townhouse residential buildings." • Meg Twohey 12 Federal Street; does not agree with the City Planner's characterization of the Gateway project as fully compliant with the North River Canal Corridor Master Plan and Zoning. Chair Anderson opened the meeting to public comment: • Jane Arlander 93 Federal Street; had questions for Mr. Vetere, thanked him for coming and providing a summary of the site. She has contact with seniors and many are concerned about the environmental hazards that existed on the site. Why is the vapor barrier needed if the AUL • has been removed and the contaminated soil has been removed? o Vetere replied: ❑ The petroleum contaminated soil was removed, but the AUL has not been removed. ❑ The AUL requires Vapor barrier required to protect against some contaminants that are still in the groundwater. ❑ Proposed AUL change would to allow multi-family, not single family buildings. • Ms. Arlander explains that she is concerned about contaminates shifting underground, previous buildings had documented flooding and reportedly were sinking. ❑ Clay settles at a slower rate than sand, the surcharge has dealt with the sand nearest the surface. The piers will reach down deep into the clay which is firmer and moves very slowly. • Ms. Arlander asked if there will be a peer reviewer on the environmental issues. Mr. Vetere advised the peer reviewer is essentially the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). o Ms. Arlander asked if any soils removed from the site have to be tested for Beryllium, or any other containment. Mr. Vetere explained that there are a number of metals, ph- organics etcetera that need to be tested for, but he is not sure if Beryllium is required in the test. • Ms. Arlanders questioned whether coal ash is a hazardous material. Mr.Vetere replied that coal ash is a solid waste. It is generally not soluble in water and so it does not tend to move. On this site the coal ash is not in the ground water, but above it. Very rarely will you see dissolved metals or phs in ground water. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19,2015 Page 7 of 9 • • Mary Madore 31 Forrester Street; Asked how many test pits dug for heavy metals or hydrocarbons and were they within acceptable limits? Mr. Vetere said about twenty (20) borings,the chemistry meets the MCP requirement for below grade, isolated from contact. o Ms. Mardore asked what is the lifetime of the vapor barrier and where will it be located. Mr. Vetere replied the paved parking lot will last approximately ten years but will need maintenance. The building barrier will last forever (as long as the building is there), every square inch of the building, including the CLC will have a barrier. o Ms. Madore asked where will air conditioner units be— she is concerned about venting sucking in volatile solvents contaminates. Chair Anderson replied that building code requirements would preclude this from happening. o Ms. Madore was an ICU nurse and was on the Board of Health. She suggests caution in dealing with Beryllium. • Meg Twohey 122 Federal Street; would like a copy of the current AUL and the LSP reports. Mr. Vetere advised the AUL can be found online at DEP website. He will forward his reports to the Planning Department. o Director of Planning Lynn Duncan suggested he send link to the AUL to the Planning Department so it can be made available. • Pamela Jendrysik 3 Hamilton Street; expressed concern about contamination coming up through grassy areas. Mr.Vetere said grass will have three(3)feet of new soil under it. o The idea is to prevent contact. o Board member Mr. Rieder observed that trees and some plantings will be planted deeper than three (3) feet. Mr. Vetere advised there will be requirement of handling . instructions for construction/landscape/utility workers- per the AUL which is filed with the deed. • Chuck von Bruns 3 River Street; asked for construction method clarification with regard to surcharge and piers—he understood the project was not going to use piers once the surcharge had done its job of compression. Mr.Vetere confirmed piers on aggregate pile(not a driven pile) have always been part of the construction plan. Settlement is caused by both fill and building loads. • Tim Jenkins 18 Broad Street; asked why there is no surcharge on the CLC site, and how long does compression take? Mr. Vetere said compression takes about eight (8) months. There are plans to add surcharge to the CLC site,authorization is pending. • Lou Siranni 6 Botts Court; heard there may be layout and design changes and asked for clarification. He spoke in favor of design changes, and asked if any changes would delay the project. He spoke against the current drawing with the CLC parallel to Bridge Street.Advocate of moving the entrance and turning the layout. Atty Correnti advised the applicant has nothing to present this evening. Chair Anderson advised the Planning Board has no information at this time. • Heather Famico 195 Essex Street, Ward 2 City Councillor; asked for an update on project financing. Atty Correnti advised the project is getting more expensive by the month and delays are a concern as all costs are increasing.This project is fully financed. • Joyce Wallace 172 Federal; asked how does the AUL application relate to the DEP review? Atty Correnti clarified her reference as the appeal filed by residents regarding the Conservation Commission Order of Conditions (issued for this site), Ms. Wallace affirmed, yes. Atty Correnti advised the appeal to the order of conditions is separate from the LSP work. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19, 2015 Page 8 of 9 Additional Board Discussion • • Board member Carole Hamilton asked if the DEP AUL change request which allows for multi- family use has submitted, and how long does it generally take to receive approval. Mr. Vetere said no submission has been filed yet and the process does not include a formal approval from DEP. LSP submittals are considered official at the time of submission, the DEP allow themselves up to five (5)years to audit. o Director Community Planning and Development Lynn Duncan asked Mr.Vetere to clarify AUL status. Mr. Vetere said 2010 is available online; the 2015 is not yet public information. Ms. Duncan advised this is what City and residents want to review as the current AUL for the site does not allow multi-families. o Atty Correnti provided an overview of the process. Because AUL's are attached to property title at the Registry of Deeds, they are not filed and recorded until a project is finalized. It is inappropriate to "record an AUL prematurely. The AUL is shaped to the final,approved project. o Ms. Duncan accepted this technical aspect but emphasized the Planning Board must have visibility to the proposed language of the revised AUL to be able to complete their site plan review and special permitting process. o Atty Correnti suggested the Planning Board should reply on representations and assurances from the LSP of the key components of the revised AUL, and any decision can be issued with a condition of the revised AUL. He also advised a condition in the decision regarding compliances with MCP conditions is common and acceptable to the client. • Chair Anderson reminded the Board to use the City guidelines for site plan review and special • permit review as they assess the project. • Meg Twohey 122 Federal Street; observed the Design Review Board (DRB) has not met on this project since August and asked to know when the project will appear on the DRB agenda. Atty Correnti advised he does not have a specific date but certainly it will need to be soon. He also thanked the Board and the attending public for the ongoing interest in the project. Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to continue the public hearing to December 3, 2015, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with seven (7)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Mr. Veno, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Vale, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Old/New Business • 2016 Planning Board Meeting Schedule The Board agreed to review and vote at the next meeting. • Gate at 28 Goodhue Street Staff Planner Amanda Chiancola reported the removal of the post will be costly. In addition due to the two existing bollards, the post does not impact the use the trail and therefore, there is not a nexus to require the removal of the post.The board contended that the post is in violation of their Decision and discussed whether an opinion should be from the City Solicitor of the City Building Inspector. Chair Anderson requested the Planning Department to ask the building inspector to bring this site into compliance. Ms. Chianola will report at the next meeting. • Yin Yu Tang Transformer • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—November 19,2015 Page 9 of 9 • Ms. Chiancola reported the zoning enforcement officer spoke with electrician on the PEM project. This was a temporary installation to provide power to museum during an expansion. The expansion has been put on hold, so the transformer will stay until the expansion restarts and is completed. Board noted the location of this temporary installation was ill-advised and now the City is stuck with the eyesore for an extended period of time. It was noted there was no appropriate review for this temporary installation. Adjournment Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor ( Mr. Anderson, Mr. Veno, Ms Sides, Mr. Rieder Ms Yale Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 9pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/node/2186/minutes Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk • Approved by the Planning Board on 12/03/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law MG.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance § 2-2028 through§2-2033. • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 NOV -4 P 1: 1-8 FILE_ CITY CLERIS, SALEM, M! SS Corrected' Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to lack of items on the agenda, given that all Applicants have requested continuances. CONTINUANCE REQUESTS: Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25,Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street(Map 15,Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC • Description: The Applicant has requested continuance of the public hearing to the next regularly scheduled planning board meeting on NOVEMBER 19,2015 Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET(Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES,INC. Description: The Applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled planning board meeting on DECEMBER 17,2015 Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6,Lots 7,8,and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: The Applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the next regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on NOVEMBER 19,2015 (Corrected) NOTICE OF A SITE VISIT: Although not a public hearing, you are hereby noticed that the Salem Planning Board will conduct a site visit on Saturday, November 7, 2015* at 9:00 a.m. at 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) for the Gateway Center Project. This notice posted on "Offici I Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on I&M y �/� Ben Anderson, Chair • at / J g ptr in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Salem Planning Board Sections 18-25. tri CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 NOV -4 A 8. 31 FILE # CITY CLERK, SALEM, 11� SS, Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to lack of items on the agenda, given that all Applicants have requested continuances. CONTINUANCE REQUESTS: Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25,Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street(Map 15,Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC • Description: The Applicant has requested continuance of the public hearing to the next regularly scheduled planning board meeting on NOVEMBER 19,2015 Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET(Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES,INC. Description: The Applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the regularly scheduled planning board meeting on DECEMBER 17,2015 Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6,Lots 7,8,and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: The Applicant has requested a continuance of the public hearing to the next regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on NOVEMBER 19,2015 NOTICE OF A SITE VISIT: Although not a public hearing, you are hereby noticed that the Salem Planning Board will conduct a site visit on Saturday, November 9, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. at 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305)for the Gateway Center Project This notice posted on "Offici 1 Bulletin Board" City all, Salern, Mass. on Do � A0 1,5-• at 7:31 �'m in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Ben Anderson, Chair Sections 18-25. Salem Planning Board CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 OCT 29 P 1: 4t NOTICE OF MEETING FILE # CITY CLERK, SALEM, M;SS. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,November 5, 2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem,MA Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 15, 2015 III. REGULARAGENDA Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC • Description: A continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits c associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use M District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning CL R Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay Ln 0District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the co so C J North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCG) d N Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mined Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of Mv= the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. ;CD 3: The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow Oo ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the U) o 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be o amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the y premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two to E •q vi separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, 0. and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge m< coStreet with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. c in = Q,ocation: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) r �Y► pplicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. • P U A ODescription: A continuation of a hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for November 5,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 • Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6,Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: The Applicant has requested a continuance of a public hearing to the next regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on November 19, 2015 for a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twent3xsix (26) residential lots, and a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 37. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • Gate at 28 Goodhue Street • Yin Yu Tang Transformer V. ADJOURNMENT KwwyuurrightsordertheOpenM"LawM.GL. c 30A § 18-25 and City Orai wu§ 2-2028d5n#§ 2-2033. • • -20 Fti M1 h;,nN S R -T, SALEM MASA'GRI,I FES 01970 - PHONL 978.619.5685 Pak 978.740.0404 • WW"WSaLENI-COM CITY OF SALEM s ; " PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, October 15,2015 at 7:OOpm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 3,2015 • September 17,2015 III. REGULARAGENDA o Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Sgegt (%Rp 15, Lot 305) " o • Applicant HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: A continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the appFved SR Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and 5pecial Wmuts associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborho-6a Mbo Use District in accordance with the following sections of the `Salem 'Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. • City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for October 15, 2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES,INC. Description: A continuation of a hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A continuation of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twent},six (26) residential lots. The applicant has also submitted an application for a Stormwater Permit in accordance with the Salem in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one acre of land. Location: 50 ST. PETER STREET (Map 35,Lot 179) Applicant: OLD SALEM JAIL VENTURES Description:A public hearing for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approved on December 12, 2006 and amended on April 22, 2008; July 28, 2008 and March 19, 2009 in accordance with Section 7.3 Planned Unit Development of • the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment is for the option to add three residential units in the former 3,200 square foot restaurant space. Parking for the three new units is proposed to be provided with the existing three onsite spaces that were dedicated to the restaurant use. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 207 Highland Avenue Project Update • Election for Planning Board Officers • Point Neighborhood 40R Smart Growth Overlay District Update V. ADJOURNMENT Kw your n&wrier the OpenM"LawM.G.L. c 30A § 18-25 and City OAmme§2-2028 thrar*§ 2-2033. This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City• Hall, Salem, Mass. on�4 d`d/s.at a $pin accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, 20 tiG ASr M;roN Sl tT, f�flQft � ris 01970 • PHOVS 978.61M685 1.nx 975.740.0404 ��NUIT,g9�i CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND '�Q�1nivE ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 0 FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN Dl1NCAN,AICD DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner DATE: October 8, 2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting—October 15, 2015 Please find the following in the file: Agenda for October 15,2015 regular meeting ➢ Planner's Memo ➢ Clark Avenue - Stormwater Management Report ➢ Almeda Avenue—Memorandum from the City Solicitor • ➢ Gateway Center Presentation—September 17,2015 ➢ Gateway Center Status of the Civil Engineer Peer Review ➢ 50 St. Peter Street - Planning Board Decision of a Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review, dated December 7, 2006 ➢ Amendment 1 -Planning Board Decision dated April 17,2008 ➢ Amendment 2-Planning Board Decision dated July 17,2008 ➢ Amendment 3 -Planning Board Decision dated March 19,2009 ➢ Draft Minutes - September 3,2015 ➢ Draft Minutes - September 17, 2015 APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 3, 2015 • September 17,2015 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Continuation of a public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use consisting of the construction of two separate • buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story City of Salem:Planning Board Staff Memorandum—10/8/2015 • Page 2 of 4 mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. The petitioner requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer.A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. A copy of the presentation from the September 17th meeting is included in the Planning Board packet. The project is also before the Design Review Board (DRB). The DRB's role is to review proposal to ensure they are designed to complement and harmonize with adjacent land uses with respect to architecture, scale, landscaping and screening. The applicant is currently working on responses to comments by the DRB from the August 23, 2015 meeting. The Aurust, 201.5 DRB mire tes ate available online'. The petitioner's traffic engineer, Vanasse & Associates, Inc. has prepared a traffic impact assessment dated June 2015. The traffic impact assessment is enclosed. Fay, Spofford and Thorndike (FST) is currently conducting a peer review of the traffic impact assessment. We anticipate comments from FST following any site plan changes that may be proposed. New England Civil Engineering (NECE) is conducting a peer review of the civil • engineering plans and Environmental Impact Statement. A status of the peer review by NECE in enclosed. The purpose of the NRCC Mixed Use Overlay District is intended to fulfill the goals and objectives contained within the Neighborhood Master Plan for the North River Canal Corridor (the NRCC Plan). Please familiarize yourself with the NRCC Plan which is available wilirne2. I will also provide you with a hard copy of the plan at the meeting. 2. 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Continuation of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. According to the applicant, the lots are dimensionally pre-existing nonconforming lots along an accepted public way that is currently unpaved. However, based on the review of the record by the City Solicitor, Beth Rennard, Lots and 116 and 117 of Map 14 have merged, creating one lot. One property owner, George Belleau, has control of both lots. The legal standard for merger by common control is whether a person had the power to use the adjoining land. As such, in the opinion of the City Solicitor,Lot 116 and Lot 117 of Map 14 have merged. A memorandum from the City Solicitor is enclosed with a summary of the record. �ht� �e¢g nil<m wm;sne tiil�mn:a til<<r1YunuR� dib meust 26 1 5,pdI h _,palcm nuii.nitc v dt,mma file+f upl,�ad� nuc magti.lphn 17.d1 City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum-10/8/2015 Page 3 of 4 One house may be built subject to Planning Board approval as a Definitive Subdivision unless variances are approved by the Board of Appeals. 3. CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9) Continuation of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots. The petitioner has submitted an application for a Stormwater Management Permit in accordance with Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of Ordinances to allow for activity that results in land disturbance greater than one acre of land. The Stormwater Management Permit application includes a Stormwater Management Report prepared by Williams Sparages, dated September 24, 2015. The report has been uploaded in the dropbox folder for this meeting. The City has requested New England Civil Engineer Corp. to conduct a peer review of the Stormwater Management Report submitted by the applicant. Staff anticipates that they will be under contract shortly. The land disturbance is proposed in order to accomplish the Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit described above. Thus, the subdivision is contingent upon the approval of the Stormwater Management Permit. • Enclosed are plans and supporting materials for a Definitive Subdivision Plan and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit. There have been no revisions to the plans since the September 17, 2015 meeting. The plans and supporting materials are currently under departmental review. The project is anticipated to be scheduled at the October 13, 2015 Board of Health meeting. The petitioner is currently working on preparing a utility plan,per the request of the Engineering Department. 4. 50 ST. PETER STREET (Map 35, Lot 179) A public hearing for an amendment to an approved Planned Unit Development that would allow the applicant the option to convert the former 3,200 square foot restaurant use to three housing units.There are no proposed changes to the site plan. On March 19, 2009, the Planning Board approved an amendment to the Planning Board's approval for the redevelopment of the Old Salem Jail that would allow the proposed restaurant use to be converted to three (3) housing units, if the owner was unable to rent the space to a restaurant within 12 months of closing on the property. The subject tenant space was leased be a restaurant within 12 months of closing; however, the tenant space is now vacant. The petitioner requests for the option to convert the restaurant use into three housing units. The subject property is located in the Central Business Zoning District (B5). Pursuant to Section 5.1.9(1) of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, nonresidential uses in the B5 District shall • City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—10/8/2015 • Page 4 of 4 not be required to provide off-street parking since the community will accept the responsibility for nonresidential parking in this district. Therefore parking was not required for the restaurant use. Nevertheless, there are three existing diagonal onsite parking spaces that abut Bridge Street. New residential dwelling uses in the B5 District require 1 parking space per dwelling unit for existing buildings. The proposed conversion would consist of a rehabilitation of an existing structure. Pursuant to Section 5.1.9(2)(b), the parking requirements for rehabilitated buildings may be accommodated by either one or a combination of on-site parking and/or parking at municipal or other parking facilities in the vicinity of the proposed use. Parking for the three new units is proposed to be provided with the existing three onsite spaces diagonal onsite parking spaces that abut Bridge Street. No additional parking is currently proposed under the subject application and the driveway will remain as it is shown on the current plan. It is noted that the request of the Mayor, a Council subcomrnittee has agreed to recommend to full Council up to 17 parking spaces for in front of the jail, subject to a restaurant going into the space. It is being voted at tonight's Council meeting (10/8/15). However, this amendment for the conversion of the space to three residential units is requested should NBV remain unable to find a restaurant tenant. I. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • • 207 Highland Avenue —Project Update: The requested removal of the pigeon shelves at this location is complete. • Election for Planning Board Officers—Election of a Vice-Chair. • Point Neighborhood 4011 Smart Growth Overlay District Update — The City has hired the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) to implement a smart growth overlay district in the Point neighborhood pursuant to MGL Chapter 40R. This will build off of the Point Neighborhood Vision and Action Plan, completed in 2013, and the Point Neighborhood Commercial Corridors Revitalization Plan, completed in December 2014.As part of this process a working group has been assembled. Given that the Planning Board makes recommendations on all zoning ordinances, Chair Anderson has been appointed as the Planning Board representative on the working group. It is anticipated that the ordinance to establish a 40R district in the Point will be ready for consideration by the Planning Board and City Council by May or June of 2016. At this time,no action from the Planning Board is needed. Is • City of Salem - Meeting Sign-In Sheet Boardia�nncn� Date 10 / 15 / 2015 Name Mailing Address Phone # Email Lb 5(% ) 37 q2K?VS- 9I6L jw6Aev,i'GCaA44-57�l et <�98-? 16-0 � -7 L{ --te�a• • V41�21LY77�r NI�ICd1I�e� J lam! !1'Yi� q79- 4N•n4/I. hoinou.n.�� AY4�•�0�'l Hese -/�u�ni Cr 19Smasse. S+ aG�€2i9�riia (. 9awv'(-. QLQa" <o, /I[ ®a, _2� lI _�-j.�va�e ,!}. �` l �—T9�'--�`�?l en•c. AaPe�,• �9'�e" �. c�M Vjrc6 c -XA-4 s-r ;l6e qId s4�.oyys JAQk . Hu uAND 6) iZ C(4 L/C lh/}GLG s�r�-�kl S`�� jREMe,,/TIT• �°,R-�,vMq 6<7-j��-y336 Mknunrv��Pc�+A&, lon C-lcv�� vc Sc," T \ c11'J 1Si1 L�foo�a�D@comc-uvtr� (", fi1�+ r+.�y,J��+vJa -1.io o•Y�--�.✓��..� u1 h�. • Page of _ . City of Salem' Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for 1 all persons interested in the ap-! plication of OLD SALEM JAIL VEN- TURES, LLC for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development ap- proved on December 7, 2006 and amended on April 17, 2008; July. 17,2008 and March 19,2009 in ac- cordance with Section 7.3 Planned Unit Development of the Zoning Or- dinance.The proposed amendment is to add three residential units in the former 3,200 square foot restau- rant space for the property located 'I at 50 ST. PETER STREET (Map 35, Lot 179). Parking for the three new units is proposed to be provided J with the existing three osite spaces j that were detlicated tot a restaurant use. The public hearing will be held on Thursday,October 15,2015 at 7:00 } 1 PM,in Room 313,Third Floor at 120 t .Washington Street in accordance j with Chapter 40A of the Massachu. t setts General Laws. A copy of the I application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning &Community Develop- ment, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street,Salem,MA. Ben Anderson,Chair SN-10/1,10/8/15 Planning Board i CITY OF SALEM r Vii' PLANNING BOARD 1015 OCT - I A 8: 31 FILE is CITY CLERK, SALEM,MASS. City of Salem ttrY �' °t' ` "' `�+ ""ss. Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of OLD SALEM JAIL VENTURES, LLC for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approved on December 7,2006 and amended on April 17, 2008; July 17, 2008 and March 19, 2009 in accordance with Section 7.3 Planned Unit Development of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment is to add three residential units in the former 3,200 square foot restaurant space for the property located at 50 ST. PETER STREET(Map 35, Lot 179). Parking for the three new units is proposed to be provided with the existing three onsite spaces that were dedicated to the restaurant use. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. • Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 10/1/2015 & 10/8/2015 city of Salem rye . .V ) "Planning Board --A* � t'Will. hold a.public hearing;for ,all persons.'interested in.ihe.ap- ilplication of OLD SALEM JAIL VEN- TURES,LLC-for an amendment to the Planned Unh beveloprtrent a_ proved on December 7, 2006 and amended on April 17,-2006 July 17,2006 antl March 19,2009 m a y cortlance with Section 7.3 Planned. Unit Development of the Zoning Or-; dlnanCe.The proposed amendment This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" is to add three residential units in theformerfor hequarefootocate-_ cityHall, Salem, Mass. on jlr`T (t q0�e rant.space for the properly located v44{ 41Y•1 L IJl {at 50 ST. PETER STREET(Map 35, at (�lit'1 in accordance wt h L ap. 30A, Lot 179). Parking for the three new{ units is proposed to,be`Provided'' SQCt10nS �8-25. Et, thas xisting threeonsite spaces mat were dedicated to the.resisurant use ,n .. The Public hearing will be hold on Thursday,October 15,2015 at 7:00 PM;in Room 313,Third Floor at 120.t Washington Sheat inaccordance.1 with Chapter 46A of the Massachu- �• setts ; General Laws.A copy of the F application and plans are on hle.and_•r available.for review during normal F business hours at the Department iof Planning&Community Develop-.s ment, Third Floor, 120Washington 4Street,Salem,MA. t _a Ben Anderson Chair "ALEN-1, MA—SSACtIt-�P:'T"fs 01970 PHONE 978.619.5685 Fns 978.740.0404 „'Vr'RlJr i[nLCOM 4SN 70/7; 1018/15 tPlanning Board CIN OF SALEM t PLANNING BOARD 1 Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the applica- F bon of NSD REALTY TRUST for a Stormwater Management Special _ Permit in accordance Sec.37 of the Salem Code of Ordinances to allow t for activity that results in a land dis- turbance greater than one acre of land within the City of Salem. The Proposed development is located at Clark Avenue,Assessors Map 6, Lots 7,8,and 9. The public hearing will be held on Thursday,October 15,2015 at 7:00 PM,in Room 313,Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachu- setts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning&Community Develop- ment, Third Floor, 120 Washington t Street,Salem,MA. Ben Anderson,Chair Planning Board - SN-10/1,10/8/2015 J CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD FILL # CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS, City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST for a Stormwater Management Special Permit in accordance Sec. 37 of the Salem Code of Ordinances to allow for activity that results in a land disturbance greater than one acre of land within the City of Salem. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. . The public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 15,2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Community Development, Third 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Floor, Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 10/1/2015& 10/8/2015 rq cITYDpSgIEM x Will hold a pub BOLD - �I Persons SD e�TM m h pp 11 tion Of NSD Stormwater Mana TRUST.for a� i ;PermitaCod Saot37 o{trecthel " ,tor activity thatresultsncas to allow . rbanceesuhs in a land cls - land Within greater the cityan one acre of prbposed.developmerttsslern. The.- 10ts Clark79,and 9.e'Assessors.located Thursday Public t ng will be held on j This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" ibbysin M, nRoo°313ars 2075at7o� ashmgtan Third Floor at 120 City Hall, Salem, Mass. ort with C 'n eccoafance UCT o 2015 acts G' Be81�A of the Massachu_ .Plicahon and p:'A copy of the S a Y in accordance with MGL Cha are 0 Sections 18 p. 3OA, out tw during,#Is dl' 8-25. if Plan .the De menta-'fhiiy F)Cbmmunity Develont Suee[;Salem �� t20 Washin ` or'Ben MA.+'.yr rM.� 8ton PI inde�n Chau • ipN.y10/19Oar 0/8/2075A 120 T4 �,SHINOI�� b IRIiEP, S (A.M, itiSAS1%C}IUSb;11;5 01970 ' I'HONIF 973.619.5685 FAx 978.7r40.O4O4 • wwA SAJ,yk,cov City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 1 of 17 • City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday,October 15,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313,Third Floor,at 120 Washington Street,Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting at 7:15 pm. Roll Call Those present were: Ben Anderson, Chair, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno, Noah Koretz and Helen Sides.Absent: Carole Hamilton. Also present:Amanda Chiancola,Staff Planner, and Stacy Kilb, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Lynn Duncan, Director of Community and Planning Development announced new planner, Amanda Chiancola. I Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET(Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) • Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. Chair Anderson, announced the applicant has requested a continuance to the November 5, 2015 regular scheduled meeting. Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to continue the public hearing to November 5, 2015, seconded by Noah Koretz. The vote was unanimous with seven(7)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Ms.Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and none(0)opposed. Regular Agenda Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25,Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street(Map 15,Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for the petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 2 of 17 the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Documents and Exhibitions: Attorney Joseph Correnti presents of Serafini, Darling & Correnti, LLP, 63 Federal Street, Salem, presented forthe applicant. Other presenters included: • Mayor Driscoll • Lynn Duncan, Director of Planning and Community Development • Elaine Bellow, Massachusetts Council on Aging Attorney Correnti opened the presentation with a recap of the project's status. Since the last Planning Board meeting they have been full speed ahead. The developer and his team have been to a DRB meeting and have met with DRB members. They are taking comments and looking at ways to improve the projects in accordance with the DRB comments. Design Review Board Meetings will continue regarding building themselves, specifically the architectural features among other things. The developer's team has also been in touch with the City's engineering and traffic peer reviewers. The City peer reviewer has requested additional information. That information is flowing back and forth, that information will be reported at the Nov. 5th meeting. They have listened to the previous Planning Board comments, and comments for the public.Those comments and recommendations have also been taken into account. Attorney Correnti notes that the team is not there tonight and they are not making a formal presentation on behalf of the applicant, but the project is moving full speed ahead. Mayor Driscoll provides a presentation to share the context of the Community Life Center and the North River Canal Corridor Plan, both of which have been in the works for a long time. The City started looking for a Community Center prior to nine years ago. Mayor Driscoll states that the process began about 9 years ago in earnest, having chosen the St. Joseph's Church Site on Lafayette Street, unfortunately it was closing. Currently the City has a Building on Broad Street; it has a large campus, but is not a great setup for a modern day Senior Center. Mayor Driscoll outlines the inadequacy of the setup of the current senior center/Community Life Center. The building is 15,OOOs square feet, laid out over three stories with an awkward shape and is not ideal as it limits the City from doing more. The building has stellar employees and offers an array of services offered to over 8,000 seniors, some of whom never enter the building but receive,services, some of whom come for socialization meals, others come for programs or transportation hub- our rides are up tremendously. However,the building is holding the City back from doing more. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 • Page 3 of 17 The current Center is a place that needs more than what the City can accommodate within its walls. Mayor Driscoll outlines the history of the St.Joseph Site, and why it was chosen for the Community Life Center. It would have had a first floor CLC, with 18,000 square feet that would provide a seamless operation of the facility and stability for the neighborhood. It included a combination of condominiums and apartment rentals. The project went far, but the City could not advance without a 6 to 5 vote of City Council for the bond authorization. There was a split vote: 5 to 6. Despite a lot of effort and time, they saw this as a huge opportunity that was lost at the time. Nevertheless,they still recognized that the City needs a first class facility for the seniors that are here and a center that could perform the level of services that the City should and wants to provide for a City as diverse as Salem. A Senior Center Committee was then formed in 2007 "to investigate possible locations for a new senior center."This committee took a great deal of time to analyze options for the Senior Center.They worked on programmatic and siting issues. Mr. Veno,a member of that Committee (co-chair), comments that they wanted to move past everyone's "favorite site" everyone had a favorite site. They wanted to take a more analytical thought process by asking what we want a CLC to be able to accommodate. Thus, they determined the programming, parking, and other criteria that they want the building to accommodate. Then, City owned properties were evaluated against the criteria established and the list was narrowed. Private properties were not considered originally because it was not part of the original scope. The . opportunity to look at the current site at the corner of Boston and Bridge emerged as a private partnership. The site was ultimately considered and met the requirements, so was added to the list. It was a very analytical thoughtful process over the course of approximately 14 months. The process included public hearings, surveys and focus groups along with a very diverse group of people with different backgrounds.The Committee was driven by a consensus process. Mayor Driscoll continues the presentation with a review of the cost of the various sites and the locations ultimately determined to be viable. The Mayor notes that the St. Joseph's site had a purchase and sale bond for 4.2 million roughly for 18,000 square feet, whereas the current site P&S is 4.9 million for 20,000 square feet. The Committee looked at two City owned sites,the existing facility and the Bridge and Boston Street as a public/private partnership. A rough estimate of renovating the existing building would have been around the 4.4 million dollar range. The final three sites (Two City owned sites, and the Boston/Bridge Street Site) were unanimously supported by his Committee unanimously after thorough review as they fit the criteria set forth by the Committee. Mayor Driscoll reviews the original proposal for the location at Boston and Bridge Streets, but market demand ultimately did not support the advancement of the project. The cost of new construction, in particular rent to offset the cost of construction did not pan out. The next proposal, she feels, is the best one. It is a standalone, 2 story building with less parking (298 spaces) but more outdoor space. It has 20,000 square feet. This is a space that will be built out, with • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 4 of 17 upgrades will be a little more than the 4.9 million is the most affordable. If the City were to start over, it • would not be feasible to build lower than that price. Existing conditions of the current CLC are shown. It needs upgrading. A feasibility study was completed for future use of that building; neighbors preferred residential as the preferred use, maybe even senior housing. We have not made investments in it because the City is thinking of leaving. As wonderful as the staff is,there is an urgent need for a new CLC. The layout of the proposed new center is outlined. The Mayor recaps the City's discussion with the development team. The development team said they cannot make the commercial portion work. They know they made an agreement to build a 20,000 sq.ft. CLC, but cannot do it without any other tenants in place. But they would like to look at residential, as there is a residential market in Salem. Although it will take more permitting and a different attention in detail, the developer believes it is possible. The Mayor commends the Planning Board and DRB on their work on ensuring the project is situated in the right spot and looks good. There would be a delay changing from commercial to residential; if delay anyway, would like to design a standalone CLC vs. combined in one building. Mayor Driscoll is slightly concerned it will not be big enough, but it was a struggle to get 20,000 square feet as it is. Moving toward the idea of "senior center' to "community life center" that is in flexible space for all ages. A small building committee has been formed since the reboot of the project. Elaine Bellow presents. This is her 18th Senior Center that she has designed in this area. The Mass. • Council on Aging is a large professional organization of Senior Center directors across the State. Your Senior Center came up at their annual conference last week. It is being applauded for being a facility that would support mixed age group activities.This is a new direction in the field. Ms. Bellow outlines the major design goals; including creation a nurturing place and supporting "Aging in Place" with healthy options and allowing an "age friendly" environment to evolve through mixed age groups. She presents design ideas for the entry area. Multi-colors, with a little sheet rock and a little paint are cost effective options for decoration. Incorporation of some icon of the American home, in this case a simple clearance gas or electric fireplace is proposed which provides a warm welcome. Illustrations of potential design and gathering areas are shown. There will be Dining/gathering spaces, activity spaces that can be divided and used in multiple ways. Mayor Driscoll says that Ms. Bellow is working with a great team; also residents working on Committee are also present. All are excited about the project,which can only benefit from Planning Board input. Mayor Driscoll turns the presentation over to Lynn Duncan, Director of Planning and Community Development to review the North River Canal Corridor Plan. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 . Page 5 of 17 Ms. Duncan asks about the need for active outdoor space for seniors and Ms. Bellow elaborates. Some patio space, built in benches, walking paths are always incorporated. Green space around the building has been carefully planned. Having a two story building will allow for more outdoor usable space. Ms. Duncan outlines the Gateway Center and the NRCC Neighborhood Master Plan (North River Canal Corridor). She concludes that this proposed plan is much more consistent with the NRCC Master Plan than the prior proposal that was approved, that consisted of medical office space or some type of commercial space. The NRCC is very specific. Illustrations of the location are presented. NRCC Plan Recommendations are outlined.The site is identified as the"old Sylvann site" in the NRCC. Per the NRCC,the site has a key role in strengthening the identity of the NRCC while establishing the gateway to downtown Salem. Ms. Duncan points out similarities between the master plan images and the proposed project, including the building that wraps around the corner and another free standing building. A major recommendation in the NRCC is an urban village and a gateway. Ms. Duncan outlines the NRCC plan recommendations: - To create a landmark building at the corner of Boston and Bridge - Place the new buildings close to the street - To improve and expand the existing sidewalk along Boston and Bridge Streets • - Provide a pedestrian plaza at the corner of Boston and Bridge to promote the urban village concept - Locate parking at the rear with entry/exit as far away from the Boston/Bridge Street intersection as possible Images of proposed plan are shown. Ms. Duncan points out the small plaza and parking the rear. NRCC master plan recommendations continue: - Provide landscape buffers at the rear of the parcels to protect views of nearby residences - Seek a shared use parking strategy between users with different peak hours - Focus active ground level uses at the corner At the time the plan was done there was an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) due to contamination that would allow commercial use but not allow residential use.This is specifically noted in the plan. Although the vision of the plan is to create new housing opportunities that create a range of housing types and a range of affordability. Ms. Duncan compares the Gateway Center proposal to the NRCC Plan Recommendations: - It is mixed use:commercial, retail, housing and the CLC - It is a landmark building that wraps around the corner o The former proposal did not wrap around the corner - Improves the existing sidewalk - Public Plaza at proposed the corner - Parking at the rear - Building are proposed along the street • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 6 of 17 • - Shared parking between uses that have definite, different peak hours. Between residential uses and the CLC - Retail/Commercial at the Corner - Landscape buffer at the back of parcel along Federal Street edge - TOD within walking distance of commuter rail system - In her perspective it is 24/7 use because its residential,creating an urban village An urban village from a Planning perspective is an urban development typically characterized by medium density housing, mixed use zoning, good public transit, walkability and public space. Therefore, this proposal is much more consistent with the creation of an urban village as recommended by the NRCC plan. Chair opens to Board, Kirt Rieder asks about status of deed restriction/AUL. In response, Attorney Correnti states that that the AUL dealt with a "hot spot." It covered the whole site but focused on one particular area that had oil in the soil.The plan was to cap it and work around it, but their environmental consultant GZA,concluded it would be more feasible to remove the soil,which was done. A couple years ago the "hot spot" area had been removed and filled. The AUL will be modified to reflect the existing conditions.There will still be precautions will be taken on the site, under the guidance of GZA the LSP for the site. Mayor Driscoll states that the development and CLC works for the City due to the funding cycle. When this was proposed for St.Josephs,the idea of funding this new capital investment, going out and getting that bond was taking the tax revenue from the new growth to support that. Thus, we need to look at • this holistically. The area is marginal and needs attention, so being able to bootstrap off of private development is essential. This is an investment strategy to revitalize downtown and create opportunities. The Chair opens to public. Ken Wallis, 172 Federal St., comments that the project is well done, but is asked to stand behind CLC and look toward bigger, more moneymaking building, thus accepting both. If zoning is looked at, they will look at big building and see it does not fit. If accepted as zoned in for that area,we can have the CLC. We don't have to accept both. As a neighborhood, all they have is zoning, no other power, he feels proposal does not fit. Jennifer Firth, 3 Carpenter St. says that transit oriented development-what does that mean?Also notes that because she lives in same neighborhood, walking to town on Bridge St. with no sidewalk, they will be giving developer accommodations so they should provide sidewalks on Bridge St. It is too dangerous. People who live in Bridge Street do not use it during the day because it is too dangerous. It is not a TOD, or a town oriented development. Thomas Furey, 36 Dunlap St., Councilor at Large, comments that he respects the Planning Board and all its decisions. Many of his family members worked at Flynntan and other historical businesses in the area. The Gateway Center is an ideal name for this new development in this Gateway City. However, he believes the CLC is in the wrong place. He was in favor originally. One of his deepest disappointments in his service on City Council is that the City does not have a vibrant Council on Aging. It is going to have • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 7 of 17 • 117 residential facilities, with business, retail, commercial and greenways and for that he is confident. But it is the wrong location. This is on a hazardous waste site with flood concerns. It is also the wrong developer, excuses, missteps and delays. Also wrong for senior citizens. It is not walkable, too much traffic on Bridge and Boston Streets. Public/private is good on paper, but he does not see such a site in the area. He sees something like Marblehead HS with Senior Centers on 1st floor or Swampscott High school. He proposes that as Salem HS is underutilized with 1100 students where it could support 3000. It has easy access, and amenities. He suggests decoupling the Community Life Center from residential Gateway Center and starting from scratch. William Legault, Salem City Council, says we want to wait for good things, but we can wait so long they never happen. This parcel is an eyesore on major roadway into Salem, have waited way too long. We have had many false starts on NRCC Master Plan. We finally seem to have traction with the Flynntan also possibly being developed. This is something we have to do, but that doesn't mean it has to be done exactly as planned. It is 2 projects not one, if no senior center is built the other part will not be built and vice versa.They are interconnected.The only way to decouple them would be to stop the entire project. He suggests that the Board should look at zoning and make adjustments to plan if elements do not fit into zoning. The neighbors live there and they have concerns which should be addressed. But that does not mean this project shouldn't happen. He feels project has to happen now; otherwise it would be put off 5 or 10 years. How we treat seniors, measures the quality of a city. As of now the City is "an embarrassment"over the past 30 or 40 years, doesn't matter who you blame we need to get something Mdone. Make it happen but not at the expense of the neighbors. Patricia Zedo of 10 Andrews St. states that she has been working with Jason Silva and the Mayor's office on age friendly initiative certified by the World Health Organization (WHO).They are the 3rd community in Massachusetts to be accepted by WHO. CLC proposal on the table was part of why they were accepted. Now they must put together strategic plan to be accepted. They saw how age friendly the City already is; we can't do it without CLC. Mayor mentioned there are 8000 seniors. Nationally, the fastest growing demographic is over 80 and smallest is under 15. Every day in the United States, 7000 people turn 65.Ten years is too long. Kay Walsch of 5 West Terrace by the college. We live in a great,tight community, working with Patricia Zedo. Why not do this now? Not one place you go that will be perfect. This will be a "blessing for the community." Heavily involved with elders, 2nd masters is in gerontology, which is aging (which we do from the day we are born).This is not"the old people will go there, so let's not make it such a big deal." As some of us work with elderly and will be elderly someday. She completed an evaluation of Salem for her master's degree; this goes very far back (further back from the Church) and we have had at least four mayors try to do something. We must be realistic. In her opinion this is better than the original plan, even though she would also have accepted the original plan. You can talk about other Council on Aging (this is not, this is a Community center). If you are bringing up a child or parent that is what age friend is. We are "a disgrace" compared to some of her other Council on Aging activities. Rehabilitation money for the existing center goes down the drain;it is a waste of money. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 8 of 17 It costs money to say "no" to proposals and do rehabilitation on every building you do. It may not be • "the best" but it will be better than what was there. Seniors are getting what we want. Why say"no"to the entire project. If put off further, it will not happen. She is "fed up" and almost decided not to come to this meeting. She believes it will work. Board Comments: Mr. Veno comments that the job of Planning Board is not to say yes or no to project but to assess as presented by applicant to see if aligns with planning documents. In this case the NRCC master plan and compliance to the zoning ordinance. The Zoning ordinance is not a checklist that must meet all criteria to be approved. It allows the Board to have flexibility with process, work with applicant to improve project and make it comply with the zoning requirements. The Zoning ordinance provides teeth for master plan so can take analytical approach to projects. He has not reviewed Master Plan in a while; the Board will be reviewing it to make.sure project aligns but he is sure it is faithful in some of its specifics and in general.Second, an ongoing step/process is to go through details. Barbara Cleary, 104 Federal St., comments that the project complies with the master plan in some ways but not in others. She was part of the group that developed the Bridge Boston St. Coalition that developed vision for the Master Plan. People did not want to see big box residential standalone buildings and zoning reflects that. People thought "urban village" would connect to the neighborhoods and asks to consider. Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made o motion to continue the public hearing to November 5, 2015, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Vale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and none(0)opposed. Location: CLARK AVENUE(Map 6, Lots 7,8 and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A continuance of a public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit in accordance with the City of Salem Code of Ordinances Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six(26) residential lots. Documents and Exhibitions: Here for the applicant is Mr.Joe Correnti of 63 Federal St. As a procedural matter, he states they would open the hearing for the stormwater management permit, as noted above. This is a subsequent application to the Form C and cluster subdivision request;they will run concurrently. The analysis of the stormwater management permit is similar to that of a subdivision. The layout is presented. A peer review on Civil engineering will be ongoing and working with City Peer reviewer is working on that. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 . Page 9 of 17 Mr. Rich Williams presents drainage and stormwater management,which he feels is a major concern for the project. Sewer and water will tie into the existing structure on Clark Ave, which has sufficient capacity available. They also have an agreement with the Fire Dept. to provide residential sprinklers in the dwellings themselves. Electric and cable will also come underground from Clark Ave. and follow the road. As with all sites of more than five homes, Mass. Stormwater management and Salem codes must be met; this site has been designed to do that. The system includes catch basins within the road that follow a pipe system leading to five management areas,which he describes.There is one is a subsurface system to the right of the entrance and four detention basins that are constructed to receive stormwater management. All of those constructed surface detention basin are fed by the deep sump catch basins. Each of the detention basins has a fourbay (another pre-treatment device). All of those combined designed to remove 85%of suspended solids.Treatment is at 85%whereas 80%is required. The subsurface system will be fed by the deep sump catch basin, and then there is structural oil grit separator that flow goes into the infiltration system. That combination of treatment devices provides 85%, above the requirement. The rate of runoff will be reduced to all wetland areas; all details are in the stormwater management report,which will undergo peer review. Mr. Williams also describes the drainage system in Clark Ave and how flow will be reduced. • There is an existing pipe drainage system that collects the stormwater in Clark Ave then discharges it to the wetlands system.The proposed design reduces that discharge by taking the flow that came from the hill and in the current conditions comes down through the homes and the hillside. That fill will be piped around to the wetland. This watershed area, in the existing conditions is about 3.5 acres.Thus,there is a fair amount of fill. It is design so that none of that run off will come off the site; it will all be collected in their drainage system and circulated around the properties. Therefore, the Clark Avenue properties will benefit from a stormwater point due to the drainage system. Chair Anderson asks whether the two new catch basins at the end of the new road are self-contained or if the water will weep out over time. Mr. Williams responds that it will be self-contained. However, if there is a large storm and they reach capacity, the water would come back out the catch basins and go into drainage system. Mr. Williams states that there is not a lot of runoff that goes into those catch basins. Chair Anderson notes that it's a steep hill. Mr.Williams confirms,yes it is a steep hill but the area is small. Chair Anderson also asks why it is not on the other side of the road; it could go there but other side is a hill. Neighbors may not want it adjacent but if an engineering reason that's OK. Mr. Williams states,it could go on the other side of the road, but it is a hill. Chair Anderson suggests that further away from the abutter the better. Applicant will look at that. Mr. Rieder summarizes that the basin is clear cut to the neighbor's back door. The Stormwater report has details on how the erosion sedimentation will be controlled pre and post construction. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 10 of 17 Chair asks about adjacent neighbors and new property - how are they divided, plantings, fence? That area is densely vegetated; that neighborhood has a buffer so he wants to know how development will happen, if clear cutting, how will replace separation of neighbors. In discussion with neighbors, vegetative buffers and fencing were discussed with some areas to remain wooded. Chair thinks some gesture or discussion with neighbors should occur related to existing and proposed development. Plan should address that more clearly. Mr. Correnti agrees and states that the plan itself responds to the neighbors in that the originally approved subdivision of 26 lots had a different road configuration. The road was moved in the configuration to ensure the new development will be backyard to backyard so that existing neighbors have backyard, not roadway, backing up to them. But will also consider Chairs suggestions. Mr. Rieder states that detention pond should be pushed as far as possible, but should be shifted back more if possible to keep the band of existing vegetation in place to benefit standing of residences visually. Visually it may be a small trade off to shift it back. Mr. Rieder asks who will take care of the detention pond that spans three properties. Nick Mennino, Principal states that Association will take care of retention pond that spans 3 properties. Mr. Mennino says there may be a grading reason why the pond is where it is. There will be landscaping over subsurface drainage system. Both direct abutters are present. He describes other disturbance and how it will be minimized. They will revegetate and make the entrance attractive. Chair suggests having the landscape plan ready for the next hearing;they will work on it. Mr.Williams comments on elevation and location of retention basin. There is a reason to put the catch basin there, and it was not to provide • a larger back yard. In order to pick up as much from the road, the pond must be at a lower elevation. Chair comments that it will be a dry. It is not going to be standing water. It is a dry basin unless there is a rain event. Chair opens to the public and Mr. Erick Petty, 11 Symonds St., agrees with chair regarding the landscaping and says that detention basins can be a feature rather than an eyesore. The basin could be planted in a win-win. He also asks the Board and Developers to consider street width; it looks like a lot of pavement but new research on what the ideal width of streets should be from FHWA and MassDOT suggest lanes of 10 or 11 feet can be better and cheaper for all involved. Anything wider than 22' of pavement should be cut down; I do not know what it is. Mr. Williams states that the City's requirement is 24' and they can't go below as directed by Salem Fire Dept. Anthony Brooks 7 Clark Ave. He feels the area is beautiful and will miss seeing it undeveloped, but when they built his development 100' and 15K square feet were requirements. Putting in a subdivision, a cluster with smaller parcels concerns him. He doesn't see the benefit. He also comments that there is a sharp bend in the street with no sidewalk. In that area only one car can pass at a time and that can't happen. Some residents do park in the street and there is not sidewalk. During snow events, need to weave in and out of driveways to pass other vehicles, even on a good snow year. He is halfway up the street. Adding in a complex like that means 50 more cars up and down Clark Ave. and it is not designed for that capacity, particularly that bend. That street is much wider than the entrance to Clark Ave and this will lead to serious issues. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 • Page 11 of 17 Allison Scott 24 Clark Ave, resident of 3 years there, considered senior citizens now, were told the property was conservation land and nothing could be built. She is not sure who told her that but the previous owners also said that. She has also seen deer in her driveway. She prefers quiet; everyone cares well for property.She contends that an additional housing complex serves no purpose. The project will take time and banging. She does not want to see that go on.She is concerned about the habitat that all the animals will lose. This will affect the land as well as peoples' lives. She asks "how can you take land that isn't owned, if a public way and on public record since 1918?" It is supposed to be land court protected. It has been owned by the City Land Court Protected since 1918. She feels it is an illegal land grab. Atty Correnti explains that this project is land court registered land. It is a a paper street known as Clark Ave. They are proposing to change the street as noted. This requires Land Court approval; they have been working with them for the past six months and will continue to do so once they have an approved plan. It is not a land grab and it is not illegal. This subdivision was approved 9 years ago for 26 lots and while it is unfortunate that people were told things,they are suggestingthis is a better plan. Chair Anderson states that several letters were received on the project that will be read into the record. Three letters are read into the record and are attached to this document. Dave Colpits submitted two of the three but is not present; many concerns are presented regarding this development. He also questions the developer's right to the land the project is proposed on. He states they need to re-work the plan to take this into account. • Sandra Tran, 21 Clark Ave, states she is the most affected and is concerned about the increased traffic on the small street, as well as the impact on wildlife. The road was impassable by even one car during snowstorms; she reiterates that neighbors had to use each other's driveways to go down the street. She was also told this was conservation land that was not to be built on when she bought her house and questions the developer's right to build. She would like to see #12 eliminated or moved. Mr. Mention did speak to her about fencing and landscaping, but she still feels it is too close to her property. She would also like to see drainage moved further away. The Chair reassures her that any overflow to the system will go into the street, and not onto her property. She would still like to see more green areas. Ms. Tran is also concerned about the condition of the road, which has many potholes that have not been fixed. Paolina Alexander of 12 Clark St., has lived there since 1964. She has water every time it rains too much; her two sump pumps work to clear the 24" of flooding in the basement. She says there is so much blasting that the underwater river (possibly) comes up through her walls, which are 12" thick. She lives in a valley and when the rocks are blown up, water comes in, and she gets no relief. She would like to know if there will be more blasting or if the houses will be built on bedrock. Her basement has had cracks that have been fixed twice due to blasting. Her greenhouse has cracked. If they are blasting, they need to think about other people. She contends that their flat land is causing her house to be a river. Mr. Menino says there will be blasting, especially for the drainage system. Current blasting structures are much more refined and he feels she is far enough away to be in a different watershed. Ms. Alexander asks that they take another look as they are not familiar with the water situation. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 12 of 17 The Chair suggests that existing buildings and properties be surveyed, so any changes can be • documented after blasting. Ms. Duncan comments that the Fire Department's requirements relative to blasting and survey work will be available at the next meeting; Amanda will obtain them. Ms. Duncan states that drainage, stormwater management and New England Civil Engineering will peer review. Will also discuss traffic and blind spots with PD, public services and engineering will be consulted regarding current Clark Ave.and access. Denis Colbert, 37 Clark St., wonders why we consider cluster subdivisions. R1 zoning means 100' frontage on 15K sf. It is in the zoning ordinance but Ms. Duncan clarifies. She says legislation at state was discussed to better protect open space to allow people to adopt cluster and do it by right. This is a special permit request. Usually it is viewed as favorable b/c lots are smaller but keeps open space/woods there and beneficial. IF a regular subdivision, ALL land would be clear cut. In this configuration, only land homes are on is cleared and open space remains around them. This will preserve habitat and also provide trails for recreational use. This connects to land owned by the Conservation Commission so they want to create a continuous greenway through the City. Mr. Rieder comments also on the benefit of this configuration with less clear cutting and less paving since there is not a road network. Dave Wong of 15 Clark St. says the development looks okay but is concerned. He comments that Barn St. and Clark St. is the access road to this area. His house is at the blind corner.On snowy days, cars have no control, they will slide and spin. He is concerned about the amount of traffic by his house. When he backs out of his driveway he cannot see anything. Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made o motion to continue the public hearing to October 15, 2015, . seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with seven (7)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz. Location: 50 St. PETER STREET(Map 35,Lot 179) Applicant: OLD SALEM JAIL VENTURES Description: A public hearing for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approved on December 12, 2006 and amended on April 22, 2008;July 28, 2008 and March 19, 2009 in accordance with Section 7.3 Planned Unit Development of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment is for the option to add three residential units in the former 3,200 square foot restaurant space. Parking for the three new units is proposed to be provided with the existing three onsite spaces that were dedicated to the restaurant use. Documents and Exhibitions: Attorney Correnti presents. Mark Sevatsky is also present on behalf of New Boston Ventures. Mr. Correnti comments that the City Council has taken up the issue of parking and how it could assist keeping it a restaurant space. The administration put forth a plan to the council and has stated that it would like to see it remain.The owners to not disagree but want to have a backup plan of conversion to residential units. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 • Page 13 of 17 Mr. Sevatsky, New Boston Ventures, shows the map of 25 existing spaces for the 23 existing apartments. They are seeking a change in occupancy from restaurant to residential. The three spaces would be deeded for three additional residential units. Board Discussion: Mr.Veno asks if patio space would be deeded to three new units? Mr. Sevatsky answers,yes. Ms. Sides asks if it would be split. Mr. Sevatsky states it would be split using plantings so each unit had a discrete space. Ms. Sides asks how they would get to parking; Mr. Sevatsky responds that there would be a corridor that would lead out. Mr. Correnti states it would be where the three spaces are shown on Bridge St. Side. Ms. Yale asks about the status of restaurant or residential; she would be much happier if the green space was not used for parking. Mr. Correnti states that they would like the commercial space there;that was always the intent and two restaurants have been there and left.. The owners have met with the administration. They are not sure if additional parking would make one succeed but think it would help. The Board opines that parking was not the issue. . Mr. Correnti, comments that public space usage was important, so there is exhibit space on one entrance, and the restaurant space is the preference. It is being presented and marketed as restaurant space, and what the City council did helps, but the market dictates. After five years since project inception, a vacant space is troubling so this is meant to be a backup plan only if the restaurant space does not work out. Ms. Duncan speaks to the issue;the City is supportive of the amendment as a backup but would very much like to keep the space commercial with public access to the former jail. A previous Planning Board amendment did allow the commercial space to be three units if it could not be a restaurant. Before this was built,there was access,switched from condos to rentals, changes in the plan were required by National Park Service, including moving access around so now restaurant is not visible. So City is working proactively, reaching out to restaurants and working aggressively to fill the space as commercial. She outlines that the Council approved up to 17 parking spaces. And since the green space is within the urban renewal area,the green space will need to go before design review board and Salem Redevelopment Authority. Mr. Koretz asks a clarifying question, are the 17 spaces the council approved only allowed under the restaurant scenario or if this Board approves residential units, do they still get 17 spaces? Ms. Duncan says there is no contingency. Mr.Anderson states that the board is not being asked to review parking. Ms. Duncan explains that the spaces could move forward without restaurant. Chair Anderson is curious how the amendment would read as far as apartments/commercial space. Mr. Correnti says if too much contingency language is in there, owner, banker or fed tax credit regulator reads it and it is not understood that 3 units can go forward, it is not helpful so wording is important. They ask that wording be left to review by planner in City Solicitor/Board. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 14 of 17 • Ms. Duncan says there was wording previously so that would stand. Mr. Correnti agrees it is probably close. Mr. Rieder is wondering why it is invalid now. Ms. Duncan it was worded as "if the restaurant could not go in," but they got a restaurant. The issue is that they can't keep a restaurant. Mr. Rieder says that paper said a parking lot would come through Planning Board. Ms. Duncan states that she is struggling with this. She heard from Clerk that it requires DRB, ConCom and Planning Board approval. William Legualt City Council states that Mayor presented it, not sure why ConCom would be involved but four boards would have to review. Ms. Duncan opines it would be site plan review for PB, perhaps in floodplain so ConCom review. Rieder asks if there is harm in waiting weeks or months rather than having a vote and having it denied? Mr. Correnti states that the parking is up to the City; for the Developer there are financial implications for having space empty. A five year period for initial tax credits is coming up. There is a phase 2 to the project. To wait for parking would be problematic. Administration was generous in giving its approval in anticipation of the applicant having to go before various boards. Rieder says if they say yes and City decides to build parking, impetus was on private property and will only become more private in a net loss. He wants to see them be optimistic and see restaurant with parking. Ms. Duncan says council authorized the Mayor to move forward with the parking. Mr. Rieder is concerned they are moving too quickly, but Mr. Correnti reiterates that the intent is to keep it a restaurant; 3 restaurant groups have viewed it in two weeks. If the restaurant does not go forward, it is very unlikely that the parking will go forward as it requires expenditures from the City, though he does • not speak for the City. They may not want to build spaces if there is no restaurant, is his feeling. Mr. Rieder is still not in a mood to approve as he feels there are little safeguards. Ms. Sides would approve and feels it is very reasonable, while it is a challenging location for a restaurant. A&B says his reasons were to expand.She wants to give them that option so they can continue to move forward. Chair Anderson opens the meeting for public comment: Jane Arlander, 93 Federal St., attended the subcommittee of the council to convert green space to parking area; her main reason for doing so was to maintain public access to Old Salem Jail site. If the restaurant goes away, we still have public access to the site so her statement that we will lose access if we don't have the parking lot is incorrect. There is a wonderful exhibit that is open Monday through Saturday 10-4 but does not go all the way to the restaurant. If the restaurant is converted to residential, will public access be maintained?Yes,on terrace level. Mr. Sevatsky responds that yes, the exhibit will continue to be held open to the public. Ms. Arlander reiterates that Mayor's statement was incorrect. Ms. Duncan states that she is talking about access to that part of the building. Chair Anderson reiterates that we do not have a parking request before us and it is not part of this current discussion. Councilor Legault comments that he is concerned with public access as well. He feels that both restaurants did not utilize a back part of the jail well- where they used to hang the bad guys. There is historical interest in that. He also encourages that they reach out to some of the tour companies in City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 • Page 15 of 17 Salem to see if they can access the property. He is not opposed to residential but also prefers to see the restaurant stay.The applicant will have architects investigate. Jennifer Firth as president of Historic Salem Inc. would like to see public access maintained and did not realize there was a museum up until a couple weeks ago so it is not well advertised. Also says restaurant is very atmospheric and it would be a loss if converted to condos.She thinks we should give a restaurant a chance ratherthan granting the amendment tonight. Tom Furey, 36 Dunlap St. Council at large,says that if we had history courses by Jim McAllister, any vote precluding opportunity to have public access would be wrong, including putting in 3 apartments. He feels Jim McAllister should be consulted to allow that opportunity to take place. Mr. Correnti states there was no public access until New Boston ventures took over. As of now there is no public access since the doors are padlocked on the restaurant, though there is access to exhibit. He reminds the Board that in 2009, no one knew if a restaurant would work but they were hopeful. At that time the Planning Board did say make an effort, but we will allow for 3 units.They did not come without the blessing of the administration. Mr. Veno refers to some recent precedent regarding the hotel development. They negotiated flexibility with developer, should the hotel not work out. Our expectations were the best use was hotel for that spot;this is a developer the City has a history of working with in good faith so they do not have a reason to believe that,that good faith collaboration will change. It is a very reasonable accommodation. • Mr. Rieder says that distinction of hotel to residential was they come back; in this case they don't have to come back to Planning Board. Mr.Veno responds that the scale is different than the hotel. Ms. Duncan reframes the question as will the change still qualify as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Ms. Duncan states that the project is still a mixed use project; therefore, still qualifies as a planned unit development. Chair Anderson asks about the location of the public access to the exhibit; it is off the courtyard and there was no access from the restaurant to the exhibit; that was the original plan. Duncan says it is not that far but you do not see the restaurant entrance.Thus, parking is an issue as a matter of perception. Eric Papetti, 11 Symonds comments that this is an issue of parking spawning more parking. It is more unpleasant to walk by other parking lots than other areas. So that should be considered, because it would be a shame to build more parking due to perception. William Legault of City Council says it is not a problem of parking. It is a problem of signage and perceived access. Ms. Duncan clarifies that signage is a regulatory issue. Mr. Sevatsky adds that many tours come through and tourists, dog walkers and the community use the courtyard, so having the vote for this has value today as appraisers look at the property and for future planning. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 16 of 17 • Motion and Vote:Helen Sides made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz) ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to approve the project seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor (Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz) Approval of Minutes September 3,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to approve the September 3, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes with edits, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with six(6)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)one (1)abstain (Sides)as she was not present, and none(0)opposed. September 17,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes Minor edits were made by the Planning Board members. Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to approve the September 17, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes with edits, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor (Mr. • Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (01 opposed. Old/New Business 207 Highland Avenue Project Update Staff Planner Chiancola informs the Board the pigeon shelves at this location have been restored. The Board commented that it looks adequate. Election for Planning Board Officers The Board "volunteers" Matt Veno. Motion and Vote:Dale Yale made a motion to nominate Matt Veno as the Vice Chair, seconded by Bill Griset, The vote was unanimous with seven(7)in favor. Point Neighborhood 40R Smart Growth Overlay District Update City has hired Metropolitan Area Planning Council to develop a 4011 mixed use zoning district that will allow commercial use on the bottom and residential on top in the Point Neighborhood. Update on working groups is provided and projects will come before planning board as it is a zoning issue. The working group are examining boundaries, similar to studies but excludes Palmer Cove park. New Business • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—October 15, 2015 Page 17 of 17 Mr. Rieder comments on post on gate by Goodhue street. The Gate is gone, but the post is there. Also there is a temporary transformer at the Yin Yu Tang house. But new structure has not yet been built.The board requested for the Staff Planner to provide an update on these items at the next Planning Board meeting. Adjournment Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder, made a motion to adiourn the meeting, seconded by Helen Sides . The vote was unanimous with seven (7) in favor (Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Vale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none(0)opposed. Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 10:16pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes,copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Stacy Kilb,Substitute Recording Clerk For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes,copies of the decisions Approved by the Planning Board on 12/03/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance § 2-2028 through§2-2033. • -f ^w �o. CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 3015 OCT 19 A 10: 12 Amended Decision #4 1-ILL 0 CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS Site Plan Review/Planned Unit Development 50 St. Peter Street October 19, 2015 Old Salem Jail Ventures, LLC C/o Joseph Correnti, Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Amendment to Previously Approved Plans 50 St. Peter Street/Old Salem Jail Site Planned Unit Development On Thursday, October 15, 2015, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing under Section 7.3 of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, at the request of Old Salem Jail Ventures, LLC, to amend their plans for the • property located at 50 St. Peter Street. The amendment is to a Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review that was approved by the Planning Board on December 12, 2006 and amended on April 22, 2008; July 28, 2008 and March 19, 2009 and an insignificant change approved on April 17, 2014. The proposed amendment is to allow for the conversion of the former 3,200 square foot restaurant space into three residential dwelling units for the property located at 50 ST. PETER STREET (Map 35, Lot 179). Parking for the three new units is proposed to be provided with the existing three onsite spaces that were dedicated to the restaurant use. The Public Hearing was closed on October 15, 2015. The Planning Board voted on October 15, 2015 by a vote of seven (7) in favor (Ben Anderson, Bill Griset, Helen Sides, Noah Koretz, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale) zero (0) opposed and one (1) absent (Carole Hamilton) to approve the amendment to the Planned Unit Development Special Permit to allow the conversion of the 3,200 square foot restaurant space into three residential dwelling units with the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan a. Work shall conform to the set of plans containing Sheet C3, entitled, "Layout Plan," dated April 23, 2007, revised February 29, 2008 prepared by Finegold, Alexander and Associates Inc., 77 North Washington Street Boston,MA 02114. 2. Original Decision and Amendments Thereto . a. All conditions set forth in the original decision dated December 12, 2006, recorded at the South Essex Registry of Deeds Book 27583, Page 498, shall remain and be adhered to by the applicant. All conditions set forth in the amended decisions dated on April 22, 2008; July 28, 2008 and March 19, 2009 shall remain and be adhered to by the applicant. 3. Amendments a. Any further amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 4. Violations a. Violations of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. 6em61*1 IVA-( • Ben Anderson Chainnan 2 CITY OF SALEM • k „ PLANNING BOARD 2615 SEP 10 F? 4 2`9 NOTICE OF MEETING CITY cl16l- s;LEhl w7. You are hereby notifted that the.Salem Plannaig Hourd ivill hold its:regulurl,,schc,(Iuled tneettugon hursdrty, September Lx;2015 at 7.00pna at OLD TOtlNHALL, 32 Derbr.Sou Bert Anderson,Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL 11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o-September 3, 20't,5 I[I. REGULAR AGENDA; Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE; ST,,REET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 1 660) Application: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK • Desct prion:°1 public hcNing for a petition r cgUeSttn„=a Waiver from hrontag Requirements of the Subdivision Control aw to allosry les, that the requited 100 feet of frontage. d C. rr Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 651 and Map 25 Lot CL 660) o Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK m ,10 Description: ,Reluesr for endorsement of a plaq Uel eyed not to requireapproval under the ash 1 Subdivision-Controll..Aw ANR;. su Location: 162 FEDERAL STREET (Map 25 Lot:1'i2)(R2'Zonin District_) 11 � Applicant: WILLIAM WFIAIRFF L u P c 11 a Description Requcsr for a sig (6) month extension to cortiirtcnae eonsrrudiort antiwrued bre p p � the $eptemhet 25,2012 Site Plan Review and Flood M2za'rd DistrictSpecial '- 4 Pernm 1'lanuino Board Decision for conversion cd a fotrmet convent to eight $ o 7 ct residential units. to tdk Loc.ttion: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 23,Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street (Map'15, 0 Lot 305) G tjy' 00r U Applicant: HIGHROCK BRIDGE STK) ET, LLC Oo. C Description: 8 caiiuncaraon�c,f a public lrclsulg for ameneltuvnla to the nppxts-ed Site Plan C 2�o Review,Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits asaociatod with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Ise District to accordance,with the following sections of the Salem Zoning 7 a a 1 x fi 01Y of Salem Maiming, Board Atlernrla for September 17,2015 Nleefing Page_' of'—) Ordinance.--Section 9,5 Sire Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay Distract. The applicant requests the following'Special Pernlit associated with th,e. North River Cann] Corridor Use I ktrict ;NRCC) Secttorts 8.4:;5 and 8.4;13 North River Cart,d Corridor Neighborhood Mired $e Diarrlcr) Specifically, the applicant requests a:Spectal l`exmtr per See. Sec 4.0 of theNRCC: to allow a mnln s'tory arrangement of a multi-family residentialuse. Th'e opplicane,requests amendments to the following approved Special Pertni s of the :\*RC C:A\ Special permit per Sec 8:4,12 Retail Use of theNRCC to all ,,v „around level retail use to be amended front the original decision to exceed the 3,J{iR)gross square feet for one:t tailor 'S Special permit per,Sec.6.0 to be emended from the original decision ro willow an eating and drinking place on the preayses to reflect the pew plan.The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community l..ife Center,a two-story building, aid a tine-story mu ed-ase residential,freratl'on the corner of'Boscan and Bridge Street with an,aasociared revised p irking and hndscape layout. Location: CLARK AVENUE (Map 6, Lots 7, 8,and 9) Apphcant: NSD REALTY TRUST= Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision.Plan.in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regrulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Peratil per See. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Loniny. Ordinance to allow the construction ol'a roadway to serve tivenlvsilo • (26) residential hits. i Location: lei,and 16 ALNIEDA STREET'(Map 1=4,Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY IJOMES, INC, Description:.A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. i j IV, OLD/NE BUS[NESS 207 Highland Avenue- Project Update Election for Planning Board Officers V. ADJOURNMENT 4 ee Kmv,your%Es<1'rr.,er tfir Ort r.Wwi,; isr .1d C>:l,;.3t1,1;`I$-2� Jnr!Gz n C}•t rona:cr, _/J2&,'lrrnrrgh sf '-2ft3 .: [EE. t I a 4 a t lti:S'Ef 1Y.1(iA St's 5A!_";,Ml YS 3t it S R1 )'9 0 . Px{%I WS,69 685 17.,-t'% n a ON DIT' ,6 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner DATE: September 10, 2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting - September 17, 2015 Please find the following in the file: ➢ Agenda for September 17,2015 ➢ Planner's Memo APPROVAL OF MINUTES • • September 3,2015 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 23 JACKSON STREET and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) A public hearing for a petition requesting a Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less that the required 100 feet of frontage. Enclosed are an application and plans for review. The petitioner proposes to have approximately 42 feet of frontage along Jackson Street. The Zoning Board of Appeals approved a dimensional Variance for relief from minimum lot frontage. 2. 23 JACKSON STREET and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law(ANR). The applicant is requesting an endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR) as the petitioner proposes to change the size and shape of the lots in such a manner as to not leave any lot so affected without frontage. The petitioner proposes to join Lot A with Parcel B to become one contiguous lot. This lot has the required 100 feet of frontage. The petitioner also requests to join Lot 2 with Parcel C to create one contiguous lot with approximately 42 feet of frontage to be approved with a Waiver From Frontage as described • above. All Lots and Parcels are owned by the petitioners. Enclosed are an application and plans for review. Qty of Salem Planning Board Staff Memorandum- 9/10/2015 Page 2 of 3 i 3. 162 FEDERAL STREET (Map 25 Lot 112)(R2 Zoning District) Request for a six (6) month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25, 2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight (8) residential units. The petitioner has requested an extension as the previous developer Salem Renewal Ventures LLC has elected not to proceed with the re-development of the property and the Owner, Northeast Behavioral Health Corp has entered into a new agreement with Daniel Botwinik for the sale of the property. The current request is for a six (6) month extension effective September 25, 2015 to March 25, 2016. 4. 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305) HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Continuation of a petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review,Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review,Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCQ Sections • 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically,the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. The Cityhas requested FST to conduct traffic peer-review and New England Civil Engineering for civil engineering peer-review services. We anticipate that they will be under contract shortly. At the July 30`h meeting,the Board held comments and questions and listened to a presentation from the Gateway Center project team and extensive public comment. A copy of the presentation from the July 30`h meeting is included in the Planning Board packet. We have also received two (2) additional letters from the public with comments that are also included in the Board packet for review. 5. CLARK AVENUE (Map 6,Lots 7, 8,and 9) • A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 City of Salem:Planning Board Staff Memorandum-9/10/2015 Page 3 of 3 • Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots. Enclosed are plans and supporting materials for a Definitive Subdivision Plan and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit. The plans and supporting materials are currently under departmental review. 6. 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) A public hearing for all persons interested in the application for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots. The lots are dimensionally pre-existing nonconforming lots along an accepted public way that is currently unpaved. In addition to the request for a Definitive Subdivision Plan approval to construct a roadway to serve two (2) existing undeveloped lots,the petitioner also requests the following waivers from the Salem Subdivision Regulations: a. A waiver from Section IV A.4.1 to allow a dead end street longer than 500-feet. The current length of Almeda Street is approximately 650-feet and the proposed plan will add 80-feet of roadway for a total of 730 feet including a 35'x 20'hammerhead tum around area. • b. A waiver from Section IV. A.Le to allow the centerline radius of the proposed roadway extension to be 130 feet,which is less than the 230 feet required. The proposed radius is required due to the layout of the existing right-of-way. c. A waiver from Section IV.A.2.a to allow a waiver from the requirement to install sidewalks and granite curbing as the roadway extension will primarily be used by the occupants of the two (2) proposed residences and there are not currently existing sidewalks. Enclosed are plans and supporting materials for a Definitive Subdivision Plan and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit. The plans and supporting materials are currently under departmental review. I. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 207 Highland Avenue- Project Update:The requested removal of the pigeon shelves at this location is complete. Election for Planning Board Officers -Election of a Vice-Chair �,ONDIT V& !h ` � City of Salem — Meeting Sign-In Sheet Board Date j,Nme, MailingAddress Phone # E-mail ��1 ¢JITeerQ ese•5.ca O T��2�^J • (� r� aew cw4f gio eri C," I cK �on9t �gSP�Faa 18b roZ bE-g tt Ste , S,a� �+y 42S 3 e T ugzFi /6, MJ_wlo v/R�a f Ll .L d- °l—j`C�-2`F so` C r1/ eft • }-itoh� m( [4S Esrw-e�- Zfs a9-k2(ayIII k-r-a"ic src e_"<" G11�-37 R 7fr 79riw r5 Joan K 'ro,� �� z �, oaK.,, s � ��N„, ,.ot - tej� - c � �3 t 7j- 7 4 r 7Ltc� 0017 e JkK ST dr; ; ,/�S . �`L�2� � 4ZJ-N5Sg7T QMit. l 5-co lb$1 sfi Co r 37 ot), .V -S-k d1�K l lane CAA St q7e�- 3 4�yass est• �3�r�s�� '�►°7 �-9Ys-��1 Page of Vit. CITY OF SALE PLANNING BOARD 2015 AUG 20 A 4 34 FILE Public fearing ` oticcf't1Y City of Salem Planning.Board Will hold a Public hearing for all persona interested in the application of W Y [i; a:t'd 11113I 11i LI(.)NEK xequ<stiri a waiver of frontage requirements of,the Subdix,isioia:Control Law lt)cated at 23 JACKSON SON STREET and 171'VALE S 11 EE,"I' (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) (R2 Zoning District). "Che public'he' ruag will be held on 'Thurs.SI'P'] 3, 2015 at 7:001-,AM, at 120 V'asltington Sc, 3", floor, room 313, in accordance with Chapter=10,x. of the A14assachusetts General haws. A copy of the applicruon,and plans are on file anti available for review-drutng normal business hours at the Dept. of Planning& C©mruruiity Developmean, 3"Floor, 120 UFashirrgtou St, Salerti,N1LA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 8720'21, & V27/2015 s I I 1 This notice pasted an "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on AUG 2 0 2015 at -1,3414H in accordance with MGL. Chap. 30A, l Sections 18-25. G l r 3 O'WASFN` !ON :Eif. J11(EVI .11SSP'C...rSr€`n,f16,0 {'MUNE .619_> }Nr Ur?:�t'�ttt 41,4 1`!i' t S A G l Public Notices Page 1 of 1 • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK requesting a waiver of frontage requirements of the Subdivision Control Law located at 23 JACKSON STREET and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) (R2 Zoning District). The public hearing will be held on Thurs, SEPT. 3, 2015 at 7:OOPM, at 120 Washington St., 3rd floor, room 313, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Dept. of Planning & Community Development, 3rd Floor, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board SN 8/20, 8/27/15 Appeared in: The Salem News on 08/20/2015 and 08/27/2015 Back • • http://ma.mypublicnotices.com/PublicNotice.asp?Page=PublieNoticePrint&AdID=3892932 9/22/2015 CITY OF SALEM � ' PLANNING BOARD City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair • Planning Board Legal Ad Publication Salem News: 9/3/2015 &9/10/2015 Remit Bill to: Serafini,Darling and Correnti,LLP C/o Attorney Correnti 63 Federal Street Salem Massachusetts 01970 Phone: (978) 744-0212 120Si:.LE:, SALEM, MASSACHUSITFS 01970 971S.619.5685 Fix 9.178.740.040. Public Notices Page 1 of 1 • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of NSD REALTY TRUST for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six (26) residential lots. The proposed development is located at Clark Avenue, Assessors Map 6, Lots 7, 8, and 9. The public hearing will be field on Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board SN 9/3, 9/10/15 Appeared in: The Salem News on 09/03/2015 and 09/10/2015 Back • • http://ma.mypublicnotices.com/PublicNotice.asp?Page=PublicNoticePrint&AdID=3903168 9/22/2015 b CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots located at 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117). The public hearing will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair • Planning Board Publication Run Dates Salem News: 9/3/2015 &9/10/2015 Remit Bill to: Griffin Engineering Account Number N 31993 Griffin Engineering C/o Bob Griffin 495 Cabot Street 2"d Floor Beverly,MA 01915 Phone: (978) 927-5111 • 120 Civ'r,SkilVi�IG'N S lti� , ;', S ,lt�I, 1%I MSACIICSI,ITS 0'1970 - PHONIP, 97J.6.9.5685 FAX 97V40.0404 f Public Notices Page I of 1 • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of TONIN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. for a Definitive Subdivision Plan to construct a roadway to serve two existing undeveloped lots located at 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET (Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117). The public hearing will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board SN 9/3, 9/10/15 Appeared in: The Salem News on 09/03/2015 and 09/10/2015 Back • • http://ma.mypublicnotices.com/PublicNotice.asp?Page=PublicNoticePrint&AdID=3903167 9/22/2015 CITY OF SALFI;I PLANNING BOARD City of Salem faL' CITY C L ,`.: f .Planning Board' Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of HIGH ROCK BRIDGE`;"TREE f,. I.lIc for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and,Special Permits w"ociared with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.l Flood Hazard Overlay District.The applica nt reg6ests the following Special Permit associated with the North River' Canal Corridor x.'eighbochood Mixed I ise District (NRCC) Sections 8.4;5 and 8.4.1 1 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per,Sec. Sec:4.0 of the NRCC to allow a rrldti-story arrangementof a multi-f€milyresidential use. The applicantt-requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A:Special Permit per See. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to he amended Crom the original decision,to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for'one retailer.. A Special Permit per;Sec. 6.O to be amended front the original decision to alloEy an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan for the propertylocatedat401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25;Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street.{Map 15,I tit 305). 'Mie applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Conmuuinty Life Center, a tyro-story building, and a five-story mixed-Luse residentiaUrctail-on the corner of Batton and Bridge Street with an associatedrevised parking and landscape i layout. The public hearing will be held on Thursday,.Ioly 30,2015 at 7:00 PM, in;Rootn 313,Third Floor at 120 i 'Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Mitssachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and ;plans are on file and available for review during normal ibusiness-hours at the Department of Planning&Community Ucvelopinent, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street; Salem,MA, l i t: E Ben Anderson, Chair Platnmino Board a 4: tk °s This notice posted on "Official Bulletin R and"9 City Hall, Salem, Mass. on �i h y � ?QA #t �/PG t at r;1. i in accordant ap. 3QA, Sections 18-25. 4 k s B h G;.970 PCCM, BOBI,55, l ,h �f�<.-�3.'r4i4:i . • v 45 Sri._"r:C.ijb2 F City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 1 of 17 • City of Salem Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes Thursday, September 17, 2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at Old Town Hall, 32 Derby Square, Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting at 7:12 pm. Roll Call Those present were: Ben Anderson, Chair, Helen Sides, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno, Noah Koretz and Carole Hamilton.Absent: None Also present: Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Regular Agenda Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET(Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: A public hearing for a petition requesting a Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less than the required 100 feet of • frontage. Documents and Exhibitions: • City of Salem Planning Board Waiver Request, stamped received August 13, 2015. Atty Scott Grover of Tinti,Quinn, Grover& Frey, P.C., 27 Congress Street, Suite 414 Salem, presented for the applicant. Atty Grover advised the large single lot was purchased by the current owners in the 1990's. Using the plot of land to illustrate, he described the new boundaries being requested by the applicant. Board Discussion: The Board asked to know the average frontage in the neighborhood. Atty Grover advised the legal frontage is 100 feet. This is an old neighborhood so the average is most likely less than that.The planned frontage for the Jackson Street lot will slightly exceed the legal requirement. The Board sought clarification with regard to jurisdictions of the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals in this matter.The following clarifications were requested and provided: • Atty Grover indicated the ZBA allowed a variance from the lot area requirement of 15,000 square feet and a waiver for the frontage requirement. • Atty Grover also advised the original lot lines are shown on the currently drawing.The proposed lot cannot be accessed from Vale Street due to the grade change—hence the proposed driveway access from Jackson Street with a small frontage. • Chair Anderson observed the requested variance before the Planning Board is for very short • frontage, which appears to be significantly less than the average in the neighborhood. It would City of Salem–Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes–September 17, 2015 Page 2 of 17 be helpful to know the average frontage in the neighborhood. Several members of the Board elaborated on this point and indicated the drawings presented do not provide all the information needed to make an informed decision. A full evaluation of the request should include details including all existing buildings, current driveways and proposed driveways—none of this information is on the drawings provided. • Mr.Veno asked to know the standards the Board should use in assessing the request. • Ms. Duncan advised the waiver requested of the Planning Board falls under sub-division law; the Board should determine whether the request provides reasonable access to the lot.The role of the ZBA is to deal with lot size matters. • Staff staff planner Erin Schaeffer confirmed no City departments(Fire, Building Inspector, etc.) have registered any concerns with the proposed changes to lot boundaries and access. Some Board members indicated the drawings provided did not include enough details to determine the neighborhood context and whether the request provides reasonable access to the lot. • Ms. Sides questioned the need to request information that would typically not have been requested in the past.The drawing Provided by the applicant is what is typically submitted with a Form A application. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting for public comment: • Karen Kastenfema from New York,asked to know if abutters were notified. Atty Grover advised the ZBA process requires notification to abutters, and this is a public hearing of the matter. • The Board asked the Director of Planning, Lynn Duncan for a recommendation. She recommended approval in this case as there are no abutters who have spoken against the request, and no objections from City Departments. However going forward the Planning • Department should adjust the submission requirements to include sufficient detail to allow for a proper evaluation of access. • In response to a request for clarification from the Board, Atty Grover advised the zoning code for driveways is twelve (12)feet wide. Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none (0)opposed. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder mode a motion to allow the Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less than the required 100 feet of footage, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with seven (7)in favor(Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms.An Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and one(1)opposed(Mr. derson). Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET(Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law(ANR). Documents and Exhibitions: • City of Salem— Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 3 of 17 • • City of Salem Planning Board FORM A Application for Endorsement of Plan Believed Not to Required Approval, stamped received August 13, 2015. • Plot Plan of Land surveyed and prepared by David P.Terenzoni, P.L.S.,4 Allen Road, Peabody, MA 01960; revised September 8, 2015. Atty Scott Grover of Tinti, Quinn, Grover& Frey, P.C., 27 Congress Street, Suite 414 Salem, presented for the applicant. Board Discussion: No additional discussion. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to endorse the plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivison Control Law(ANR), seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale Mr. Griset Mr. Veno Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Location: 162 FEDERAL STREET(Map 25 Lot 11) (R2 Zoning District) Applicant: WILLIAM WHARFF Description: Request for a six(6) month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25, 2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight(9) • residential units. Documents and Exhibitions: • Written correspondence from Atty Scott Grover advising the property is under sale agreement closing November 16, 2015. Atty Scott Grover of Tinti, Quinn, Grover& Frey, P.C., 27 Congress Street, Suite 414 Salem, presented for the applicant.Atty Grover advised Mr. Wharff is the original developer of the condominiums at 162 Federal Street. He outlined the history of the property and permitting.The agreement to purchase the parcel by Salem Renewal has expired (holder of the current permits). Mr.Wharff, has entered into a new purchase agreement with a new buyer.This is expected to close November.The reason for the delays in closing is the oil leak on the property and ongoing monitoring by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).Any buyer of the lot is unable to finance until the DEP signs off.The owner expects one more extension should be enough to conclude the sale as the LSP assigned to the site by the DEP is reaching the end of the monitoring period. Board Discussion: Chair Anderson asked what the new owner plans for the property. Atty Grover advised if the permits are extended,the new owner must build as approved. ROLL CALL Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to grant a six(6)month extension to commence construction, effective September 25,2015 to March 25, 2016, seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with seven (7)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder Ms Yale • Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, and Ms. Hamilton)and none (0)opposed and one(1)abstained due to ineligibility (Noah Koretz). City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 4 of 17 Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25, Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for the petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District.The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically,the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec.Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec.8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan.The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. • Documents and Exhibitions: • Salem Community Life Center and Multi-Family/Retail Development Boston and Bridge Streets, Planning Board July 30, 2015—slide presentation. • City of Salem Planning Board Application, Site Plan Review for North River Canal Corridor, stamped received July 9, 2015. • Correspondence from Atty Joseph Correnti, overview and requested amendments, dated July 9, 2015. • Amended Traffic Study,titled "Transportation Impact Assessment Proposed Gateway Center, Salem MA", prepared by Vanasse &Associates, IN., 35 Mew England Business Center Drive, Ste. 140,Andover 01810,dated June 2015. • Amended Drainage Study,titled "Revised Drainage Analysis Gateway Center-401 Bridge Street Salem, MA", revised Jun 18, 2015. Prepared by Hayes Engineering, 603 Salem Street,Wakefield 01880, revised June 18, 2015. • Amended Plans prepared by Hayes Engineering, 603 Salem Street, Wakefield 01880 unless otherwise noted: o Watershed &Soils Map Showing Pre 1995 Conditions o Watershed &Soils Map Showing Existing Conditions o Proposed Watershed Map WD o Grading Plan C5 o Grading Plan GR o Plan Set CS-C8 • City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 5 of 17 • o Illustrative Landscape Plan prepared by Blair Hines Design Associates (landscape architects) and The Architectural Team. o Mixed Use Residential/Retail Elevations 01, dated July 2, 2015, prepared by The Architectural Team o Mixed Use Residential/Retail Elevations 02, dated July 2, 2015, prepared by The Architectural Team o Mayor Jean A. Levesque Community Life Center Proposed Elevations, prepared by Gundersen Architects. • Additional written public comments: o Dated August 18, 2015,from the Federal Street Neighborhood Association,Salem. o Dated August 7, 2015, from Rachel N. Lutts,92 Orne Street,Salem. • Slide presentation titled "Civil Engineering Presentation: Gateway Center, Salem MA" dated September 17, 2015,from Hayes Engineering, Inc. Lynn Duncan addressed the Board and audience explain the meeting was relocated to Old Town Hall to accommodate a large public turnout,to apologize for the warmth of the room,to thank the audience for their interest and participation, and to introduce the peer reviewers and firms working on this project on behalf of the City: o William Ross P.E., Principal, New England Civil Engineering; 120 Washington Street,Ste. 202,Salem o Gary Hebert,Vice President, Fay Spofford &Thorndike, LLC; 5 Burlington Woods Dr. #210, Burlington,01803 • Atty Joseph Correnti of Serafini, Darling &Correnti, LLP, 63 Federal Street, Salem, presented for the applicant. Other presenters included: • Peter J. Ogren, O.E., P.L.S., President, Hayes Engineering Civil Engineering, 603 Salem Street, Wakefield, 01880 o William R. Bergeron, PE • Giles Ham, P.E., Managing Principal,Vanasse &Associates Inc., 35 New England Business Center Drive,Suite 140,Andover 01810(transportation impact assessment) • Blair Hines, Principal, Blair Hines Design Associates, Landscape Architects, 318 Harvard St#25, Brookline 02446 Atty Correnti opened the presentation with a brief review of the project.There are two buildings proposed for the site,the Community Life Center which the City of Salem will be purchasing from the developer, and the mixed use building with first floor retail and residential units. Recently the architects for the project made presentations to the Design Review Board (DRB)and received valuable feedback. The architects and the DRB are in ongoing discussions to improve the design and incorporate public feedback.The presentation at this meeting will focus on civil engineering and traffic impact analysis. Civil Engineering Mr. Ogren continued with presentation with a slide presentation on the civil engineering for the project. Highlights of the amended plan show modest variations from the original: • Total impervious square footage has been reduced • Runoff volume and rate have been reduced 0 0 Building footprint is slightly larger(sum of the two footprints) City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 6 of 17 • Traffic generation is significantly reduced • • Number of parking spaces is reduced from 367 to 298 spaces. Other key factors: • Drawings and photos were presented to show the original site during Sylvania ownership and operation of their plant.The site was extensively paved. • Photometric plan has been done; on the Federal Street side there are residential neighbors. An extensive landscape buffer is planned and lighting is designed to eliminate any spillover onto other lots on this side. • Utility plan is not significantly changed from what was previously approved. • Sewer plan is straightforward, two connections on the residential/commercial building into an existing Bridge Street manhole, and a single connection from the community life center to a different Bridge Street manhole. • Drainage is more complex. Gallows Hill drainage area is large and has gone through multiple changes over the years, discharging into the North River.This drainage line has fallen into substantial disrepair. Flooding at Walgreens is not the North River tidal backup; it is likely due to blockages and backups in the Gallows Hill drainage system.This project will not tie into this system. o This project will tie into a drainage system that discharges into the North River further along Bridge Street. o They have added catch basins to the site. o Currently there is no treatment of drainage into the North River from this site.The storm water system planned for this site will include a deep sump and hooded catch • basin discharging into and oil and grit separator,then into a proprietary stormceptor. The total reduction leaves only 14%of solids; and complies with requirements of the Salem Conservation Commission. • Regarding the site hydrology, it is complex; affected by both coastal ocean storms and terrestrial storms. Numerous studies have been done and reviewed by this team.The AECOM Study by the City of Peabody was the most complex study. FEMA and BioEngineering Group studies focused on coastal ocean storm effects.The AECOM Study used a dynamic model following backwater from Salem Harbor upstream to Peabody Center. Flood levels pegged at elevations of 10.1 feet for 50-year storm and 10.5 feet for 100-year storm. • At this site, coastal storm flooding would first enter the catch basins in the street;then back up through the site's drainage system. When the tide recedes it would drain away again. This type of flooding occurs over the course of hours and days not flash flooding.There is time for emergency response.The damaged pipe that goes under the site will be eliminated and replaced with a new drain line on City property.After discussions with the Conservation Commission,the proponent has agreed to put a spillway at one low point adjacent Bridge Street. • Presented drawing with 50-year flood line indicating access/egress points to safety from each of the buildings. • Summary: o Adequate utility capacity o Proposed project drainage will have a reduced peak flow rate and volume • City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 7 of 17 • o Proponent will replace existing portion of City of Salem drainage system that has blocked sections with new, larger pipe to correct problem area and locate the drain in the public right-of-way. o Onsite drainage will provide water quality enhancements prior to discharge to the North River. o Long-term maintenance plan to ensure drainage function property. Landscape Overview Blair Hines continued the presentation to cover the revised landscape plan. • The buffer zone adjacent Federal Street has not changed. • Fewer parking spaces translate into more green space. • The Community Life Center(CLC) is considered to have two entrances,from Bridge Street and from the parking lot; landscaping will complement. • Adding street trees to Bridge Street. • Commercial/residential, L-shaped building will feature an interior pedestrian plaza at the corner to connect the parking lot to the sidewalk, and landscaping along Boston Street. Trak Impact Analysis • Giles Ham continued the presentation to review the traffic impact analysis.The site is considered to be mixed-use,transit-oriented.This project will undergo a thorough peer review. Design highlights were summarized: • Boston Street access limited to right turn entrance/exit. • • Expect foot traffic due to proximity to commuter rail. • Adequate crosswalks across Boston and Bridge Streets will be provided. • Weekday peak hour traffic volume less than prior proposal • Accident data reviewed, Bridge/Boston has had about 60 accidents over five years. • Line of sight for cars exiting/entering driveways meet standards. • Traffic generators; apartments, retail and recreational. • Significantly less number of trips than prior proposal. • Roadway improvements: o Adding pedestrian countdown button for crossing at Boston/Bridge intersection, o Monitor signal timing at Boston/Bridge Street intersection, o Retiming light at Flint Street. Promoting transit usage: bike racks onsite, promoting rail passes to residential tenants. Board Discussion: Chair Anderson advised Board he has requested a site visit be scheduled for the Board. In particular he believes it will be helpful to their deliberations to review the landscaped buffer zone in situ. The Board asked for clarification of the Flood zone designation for this site; Mr.Ogren confirmed the FEMA designation for the site is AE. The Board had several questions regarding storm water management: • Is what is presented tonight the same or different from the prior plan? Mr. Ogren advised this is • the same plan,tweaked to accommodate the second building. City of Salem —Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 8 of 17 • Would baffle features would help manage coastal storm surges? Mr. Ogren responded by • explaining the state has prohibited tide gates.The system will have baffles but extreme flooding will overtop. The Board also explored several questions with regard to vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the site and in the immediate vicinity: • Is the traffic crosswalk at Bridge Street an actuator? Mr. Ham confirmed yes,the project team will fine-tune the phasing details with the City. • Several Board members expressed concern with the parking lot layout will facilitate vehicular traffic westbound on Boston Street to use the site as a cut-through to Bridge Street. During morning and evening rush hours there is already traffic backup at this intersection.The Board observed that the parking lot travel aisles are 24-feet wide. They encouraged the project team to discourage cut-through traffic by reducing aisle widths to 20-feet where allowed by code. o Mr. Ham advised the developer has not distinguished space uses which is necessary to identify aisles that would qualify for a lesser width. Mr. Ogren reminded the Board the turning radius for fire vehicle access must be maintained. • The Board noted the drawings show speed bumps, but no pedestrian cross-grain markings in the parking lot.The Board suggested the developer substitute speed tables instead of bumps to reduce cut-through and provide pedestrian paths. Further,the Board pointed out there is not a safe accessible route from the corner of Pope and Boston Streets,through the site to the CLC. o Mr. Ogren and Mr. Bergeron advised the pedestrian route is along the perimeter sidewalks on Boston and Bridge Streets. • The Board expressed concern over the large expanse of the parking area and paved surface. • They inquired whether the onsite infiltrations and/or rain gardens are prohibited by the state DEP or the Conservation Commission. o Mr. Ogren advised the previous industrial activities on the site have rendered it not optimum for infiltration. • The Board asked to know the LED lamps color temperature? Not sure. o Ms. Duncan advised the City is trying to do 3000 color temperatures in as many places as possible. o The Board noted the upgrade in lighting technology to LED is important, and it is also important to do it right by choosing a color temperature of 3000 of higher. In reviewing the Landscape plan, Mr. Rieder noted there is no specialized gardens outside the CLC as previously mentioned and depicted in the rendering. Current plan shows lawn only. Other details critiqued included: the planting plan currently has inadequate quantities for a site of this size, the number of trees required by code (one per three (3) parking spaces) should be met and trees relocated elsewhere on the site if necessary;trees need to be added to the area around the CLC;the need to better screen the dumpster and its location and the location of bike racks needs to be added to the drawings. • Mr. Hines agreed both drawings and planting plan will be updated for future presentations. Mr. Koretz agreed with other Board members this is a very large amount of parking for an urban site. He asked to know how the number of spaces was determined, and was an analysis done for parking demand. He observed the CLC has only three (3) handicapped spaces and no passenger loading lane. He also noted the buffer zone is nominal. • City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 9 of 17 • • Mr. Ogren advised no separate analysis was done of parking demand. • The Board was concerned with the amount of parking provided for the CLC.The huge mass of residential space in the project is driving too much parking. • Atty Correnti clarified the parking was determined by site layout.The odd shape of the site creates design challenges. Due to the Federal Street neighborhood, there is no "back" to the site. He acknowledged there is a segment of the Board and the community that believe the site plan has too much parking; zoning ordinance and other members of the community indicate the site needs this much and more parking. Developer is flexible but cannot lose fifty(50)spaces or more due to the number of residential units. o Ms. Duncan reframed the issue and indicated it would be helpful to the Board to have a better understanding of the parking calculation, recognizing some percent of the CLC spaces will be shared. • Ms. Sides stated there is not enough clarity of how the buildings are placed on the site.The CLC needs more distinguished space. She suggested turning the building and adding green space in front of it.The CLC needs a better presence on the site and there needs to be more distinction from the residential/commercial building. • Mr. Veno elaborated on the traffic concerns, particularly on the Boston Street side of the property. He asked if the study captured traffic counts westbound on Boston Street,what proportion go straight to Peabody and what proportion turn right onto Goodhue or Bridge. o Mr. Ham said yes they have the data. o Mr.Veno asked if we need three (3)westbound lanes rather than the two (2) shown on the plan. • o Ms. Sides advised this traffic flow issue was addressed in the original plan. o Atty Correnti advised the site plan places the buildings back far enough that the land is available if it is determined that a right-turn lane needs to be added. Chair Anderson asked a series of questions based on his review: • Is the dumpster location on the plan meant to handle all buildings? It seems to be inadequate capacity. He also indicated a stockade fence is not a good choice of materials given the location and visibility of the dumpster, a masonry wall that complements the building exterior would be preferable. Please clarify the loading zones marked on the plan. o Mr. Bergeron said no,CLC will have rollout containers inside. o Mr. Bergeron indicated the loading zones on the plan are for ground floor retail. • Mr.Anderson asked if a left turn from eastbound Boston Street into the site driveway on Boston Street is prohibited. Mr. Ham confirmed yes; only right turn into/exiting is permitted at the Boston Street driveway. o Mr. Anderson echoed the concern voiced by other Board members that the parking lot as designed will become a cut-through from Boston to Bridge Street. He urged a different layout of the parking lot,or reducing aisle widths where possible. o The passenger drop-off/pick-up at the CLC does not appear to be safe for pedestrians. It is important this be improved and be made safe. • He noted the CLC building position is problematic. He suggested one way of reducing cut- through traffic would be to push the CLC closer to the residential building facing Bridge Street, create a green space between the two buildings and relocate the CLC parking to the far perimeter of the site, closer to Flint Street. • City of Salem— Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 10 of 17 • There is a need for more accommodation of pedestrians on the site. If the site addressed • pedestrian needs more, he would be open to considering a waiver for reducing the number of parking spaces. • With regard to the buffer area, he expressed concerns about how the current parking and lighting plan impacts the Federal Street neighborhood. Intent of buffer zone is to provide a separation—which in his opinion is inadequate. Proposed lighting is in the buffer zone. He will use the site visit to understand how the grade impacts the neighbors with regard to the buffer zone, lighting and parking lot traffic. • He requested the proponent make several additions to the drawings/plan set for future presentations: o Site section drawings to show relation of height of buildings and heights of neighborhood properties. o Would like to see a single elevation from Bridge Street including the CLC and residential building on a single elevation. o Fence along the buffer zone should be identified on the plans(existing and proposed). • Materials on the CLC need work, design can be brought to a higher level and hopes developer will continue to work with the DRB.The tower feature is very prominent and would benefit from more design work. • NRCC section 4.0 requires that for newly constructed buildings, unit must have entrance on first floor. Needs floorplan to see entrances, elevators for residents, and the retail plan. • The site is a 100-year flood plain.The developer is already raising the site to an elevation of 10- feet which is the flood-plain designation. Why not raise the site a bit higher to exceed the 100- Iain estimate? Year flood P • Other Board members provided additional remarks regarding the parking plan for the site: • Mr. Veno noted that wide parking lot aisles are more advantageous for seniors.Who will be using the CLC. He asked to know what the City's expectations are for CLC parking. Planned uses of the CLC include large city functions; we may need all the parking. • Mr. Koretz asked for a more creative solution to provide overflow parking for occasional CLC demand. The Board concluded there questioning with these additional matters: • Mr. Koretz also requested the elevations always include the closest building outside the site to provide perspective. • Chair Anderson asked the traffic engineer and peer reviewer to be sure to consider other projects coming on line in the area as part of their calculations. • The Board asked if any units are designated for low income families.Atty Correnti advised this is a market rate project but complies with the standard 10%set aside for low income families. Chair Anderson opened the meeting for public comment.- Chair omment:Chair Anderson advised that written correspondence has been received from several members of the public and neighborhood groups, and has been distributed to all members of the Planning Board for their consideration and are part of the public record. • Louis Siranni 6 Botts Court, Salem; stated this is an uninspired plan, agreed buildings need to be turned on the site.The CLC in particular is poorly positioned on the site. • City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 11 of 17 • • Ken Wallace 172 Federal Street,Salem; expressed multiple concerns:traffic backups on Bridge Street and cut-throughs; handicapped parking for CLC needs to be increased; sewer line for 117 apartments is inadequate at 16 gallons/minute. • Heather Famico 195 Essex Street, City Councillor Ward 2, Salem; wants breakdown of unit bedrooms to properly determine parking, utility needs; project needs recycling capability. Wants guarantee that bike racks will be located inside the building for residents;and bike racks should be added adjacent the CLC; there is a need for sidewalk improvement on Flint Street. • Christine Sullivan 111 Federal Street, Salem; this site plan is an improvement on original. Salem needs rental housing and of course we need the CLC.Spoke in favor of the project. • Polly Wilbert 7 Cedar Street, Salem; asked if the PB saw a draft of the DRB minutes before this meeting. Chair Anderson advised no. In her opinion the Planning Board needs to see these draft minutes and review both public input and DRB comments; this visibility would have improved the Planning Board deliberations and minimized redundant discussion. Residences as described in the plan and drawings are too vague (need bedrooms, appliance details to adequately determine utility and other needs). Where is snow storage onsite? No green space for 117 apartment units is a mistake. Lighting study did not show lighting around the edges of the building. Federal Street will be looking at a lot of light from inside the buildings as well as parking/exterior lighting.Walking desire lines on the site are critical.The perimeter sidewalks will little used in winter as people seek the shortest routes.The property grade elevation creates ramps for driveways, making it more difficult for some pedestrians to get from sidewalks onto the property, particularly in winter. • Jerry Ryan 4 Nichols Street,Salem; shares the concern many have expressed about the site • being used as a vehicular cut-through.Traffic at Boston/Bridge Street intersection needs more study than has been presented here. Concerned this project needs to be considered in connection with several other projects coming on line in the immediate neighborhood. Wants confirmation from City departments they have considered the traffic and utility needs of all these projects combined. • Dana Endres 166 Federal Street,Salem; suggested terracing the site with parking under the CLC building. • Barbara Cleary 104 Federal Street, Salem;the project does not seem to comply with the NRCC as buildings are too big positioned poorly and do not deliver on the intent of the NRCC. Ms. Duncan spoke NRCC compliance and affirmed the project does comply, pointing out several features including encouragement of pedestrian traffic. The Planning Board will need to discuss this and make their findings. Atty Correnti note there was a lot of good input tonight,the applicant will work with peer reviewers and DRB and looks forward to presenting updates on Oct 15. Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to continue the public hearing to October IS 2015 seconded by Noah Koretz. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson Ms Sides Mr. Rieder Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset Mr. Veno Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton) and none(0)opposed Location: 14 and 16 ALMEDA STREET(Map 14 Lot 116 and Map 14 Lot 117) • Applicant: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOMES, INC. City of Salem —Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 12 of 17 Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision to construct a roadway to serve two • existing undeveloped lots. Documents and Exhibitions: • Written correspondence from Griffin Engineering Group, LLC, with overview and applications/plans/documents dated August 27, 2015. o City of Salem Planning Board FORM C Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Pian, dated August 27, 2015. o Environmental Impact Statement o Project Plans prepared by Griffin Engineering, dated August 27, 2015 • C-1 Existing Conditions Plan C-2 Site& Utilities Plan C-3 Grading & Drainage Plan • P-1 Profile and Roadway Details D-1 Details 1 • D-2 Details 2 Robert H. Griffin, P.E., Griffin Engineering Group, LLC,495 Cabot Street, 2 n Floor, Beverly presented for the applicant.The developer was also present and answered questions: • George Belleau,Town &Country Homes, Inc., 532 Lowell Street, Peabody MA Mr. Griffin presented the request using the drawings above to illustrate the requested street extension. There is approximate 6,000 square feet of land on each of the two undeveloped lots. The developer • proposes to continue what was approved in 2006 and to extend the roadway to reach these lots. Each proposed lot will feature a modest, single family home. A hammerhead-style turnaround at the end of Almeda Street will be provided with this project. Mr. Griffin outlined storm water management and drainage plans for the roadway extension. Most homes on Almeda Street are served by private wells, only a few homes nearest Highland Avenue are on the public water service. Board Discussion: • The Board asked if the Fire Department has commented on the hammerhead dead-end. Mr. Griffin stated the Fire Department has indicated they are in favor but no written comment received yet. Ms. Schaeffer advised all City departments are working through their comments on this project. City policy allows departments 35 days from submission to review and comment; department comments are expected shortly. • The Board asked if sidewalks are planned for Almeda Street. Mr. Griffin advised they are not due to the small number of houses. • Ms. Hamilton inquired if there are additional lots in the parcel to be developed. Mr. Griffin advised yes, possibly one or two more lots. Ms. Hamilton observed it may be in the community's best interests to construct the street to the far lot line of the second lot in the application,to provide better preparation for further street extension to access the final lots. Mr. Griffin indicated the developer believes at this time there is no need to build the road this far. Mr. Belleau reminded the Board they will be improving the currently poor section of the road at this time along with building the new roadway. • The Board collectively agreed they will be interested to hear comments from the City departments on the proposed project. • City of Salem–Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes–September 17, 2015 Page 13 of 17 • Staff Planner Erin Schaeffer read into the record the following correspondence received: • Donald Harlow-Powell 12 Almeda Street,Salem; written correspondence itemized several concerns, including: blasting work completed with adequate precautions to prevent damage, protecting the conservation area around Andy's Pond and asked if the City of Salem will complete the street or leave it a deadend. Proposed lots have less than 100 feet of frontage and have not received a frontage waiver. Chair Anderson opened the meeting for public comment: • Donald Harlow-Powell 12 Almeda Street,Salem; Asked if the developer will add lighting to Almeda Street as there is none at this time. He stated his main concern is the proposed hammerhead is inadequate for vehicles turning around at the deadend. Currently trucks and vehicles are backing up which is dangerous due to a bump in the road that affects visibility. A proper turnaround is critical for safety.There is only one more buildable lot remaining. Development of these last lots will tear up the streets again, who will make those repairs? • Raymond Letarte 15 Colby Street; concerned about the undersized lots(frontage). Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to continue the public hearing to October 15, 2015, seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. • Location: CLARK AVENUE(Map 6, Lots 7,8 and 9) Applicant: NSD REALTY TRUST Description: A public hearing for a Definitive Subdivision Plan in accordance with the Salem Subdivision Regulations and a Cluster Residential Development Special Permit per Sec. 7.2 Cluster Residential Development of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a roadway to serve twenty-six(26) residential lots. Documents and Exhibitions: • City of Salem Planning Board Application for Cluster Residential Development Special Permit, Per Section 7.2, stamped received August 27, 2015. • City of Salem Planning Board FORM C Application for Tentative Approval of Definitive Plan, stamped received August 27, 2015. • City of Salem Planning Board Decision-Clark Avenue/Chapel Hill Form C—Definitive Subdivision and Cluster Residential Development Special Permit, dated March 3, 2008. • Correspondence from Atty Joseph Correnti,outlining differences to original plan,dated August 27, 2015. • Existing Condition Watershed &Soils Map in Salem, MA"The Woodlands", prepared by Williams &Sparages, 189 North Main Street, Suite 101, Middleton MA 01949; dated August 14, 2015. • Proposed Condition Watershed &Soils Map in Salem, MA "The Woodlands", prepared by Williams&Sparages, 189 North Main Street,Suite 101, Middleton MA 01949; dated August 14, 2015. • "The Woodlands" Plans: prepared by Williams&Sparages, 189 North Main Street,Suite 101, Middleton MA 01949; dated August 14, 2015 (sheets 1-10): o Index Plan, "The Woodlands" Subdivision, Salem MA City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 14 of 17 o Definitive Plan, "The Woodlands" Subdivision,Salem MA, Sheets 1 &2 . o Definitive Plan & Profile, Woodlands Road, Salem MA,Sheets 1 & 2 o Topographic Plan, "The Woodlands" Subdivision,Salem MA, sheets 1 &2 o Detail Sheet, "The Woodlands" Subdivision,Salem, MA, sheets 1-3 Atty Joseph Correnti of Serafini, Darling&Correnti, LLP, 63 Federal Street, Salem, presented for the applicant. Other presenters included: • Rich Williams, Civil Engineer; Williams&Sparages, 189 North Main Street,Suite 101, Middleton MA 01949. • Nick Meninno, president Meninno Construction, 76 Oakville Street, Lynn. Atty Correnti advised a cluster sub-division and cluster special permit is intended to waive the normal density requirements for lot area and frontage. The cluster provides open space for common use, with smaller lots surrounding it. Builder Nick Mennino introduced himself and outlined his firm's experience in the area.They are experienced residential developers especially of undeveloped land. Rich Williams continued the presentation, and provided an overview of the land challenges and design points. o Site is the result of several other sub-divisions. o Clark Avenue was created a long time ago, a loop off of it was provided to enable additional development.This development will provide 26 lots. o This project proposes relocating parts of Clark Avenue as an improvement for existing lot owners and access for new lots. • 0 700 feet less roadway and less land disturbance by%2 acre; design changes make best use of the overall site. o New lots range 6200— 13000 square feet, with majority about 7000 square feet. o Homes to be 30 X 50 footprint perhaps slightly less, in keeping with surrounding homes, o Sidewalks planned for both sides. o Sewer and water will connect to existing mains on Clark Avenue o Zoning requires 20%open space, project provides just over 50%open space. o Upland open space required 75000 sf,they have provided over 200,000 sf. o Designed drainage to reduce runoff rates, average 10-15% reduction, o Storm water management designed to meet Salem standards, o Wetlands to the north and south of the site, drainage directed around them. Board Discussion: Ms. Sides asked if housing will they be a single design applied to all, or a set of cohesive designs. Mr. Mennino advised a set of cohesive designs; generally three-bedroom and approximately 2000 square feet.An architect will review the designs. Garages will be provided. Houses will be built a few at a time and move along the development as quickly as the market permits. Ms. Sides if the plan is to lay concrete sidewalks and install granite curbing. Mr.. Mennino advised no,the planned surface is bituminous paving. Mr. Rieder asked if the roadway will be a full build-out in one phase. Mr. Mennino advised yes,one phase and willingness to accept this as a condition of approval. City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 15 of 17 Several Board members asked for clarification with regard to the use of open space. • Ms. Hamilton observed that cluster subdivision open space tends to be pushed to the rear of the houses. Often the open space isn't used by the community but is comingled in use with private lots. Requested the developer make open space a feature of this development and place it such that it is clearly accessible for community use.She also spoke in favor of residential buildings less than 3,000 square feet as most appropriate to the neighborhood. • Mr. Rieder asked to know what will be the ownership of open space. Mr. Mennino asked the space will be returned over to a Home Owner Association (HOA).Atty Correnti advised there is also language in the zoning code that the space could be turned over to the City of Salem; the proponent will comply as directed. Several Board members asked for clarification and the intent of the developer with regard to lot 27, currently zoned for industrial use. • Mr. Mennino advised they have no plans for it at this time.The builder has had a community meeting with neighbors to discuss blasting and other concerns,the future of this lot was asked; he reiterated there are no plans for this lot. • Ms. Hamilton asked if the lot, as currently zoned, could be accessed by residential road. Atty Correnti confirmed it cannot as long as zoning is industrial,and emphasized there are no plans for this lot. • Mr. Rieder suggested as a condition of going forward,the proponent be required to return to the Planning Board for discussion and approval of any changes zoning or planned uses for lot 27. • Chair Anderson asked for the engineer to describe what happens to lots 12, 13 and 14 due to the grade change of approximately 60 feet. Mr. Williams advised the drainage is all directed to a catch basin and storm water drainage. • Atty Correnti advised some abutters currently suffer from drainage issues;the proposed improvements will help these owners. Chair Anderson opened the meeting for public comment. • Sandra Tran, 21 Clark Ave; her is a low lying lot with existing drainage problems. She is concerned about her property being overlooked and more drainage problems due to increased open space and the likelihood of erosion during construction on higher elevations that drain toward her lot. Also concerned about noise and traffic for the neighborhood. Currently flooding in front of her driveway. • Chair Anderson asked the builder if a privacy fence is under consideration. Mr. Mennino advised it is being considered. • Chair Anderson requested that future presentations include supporting data that the catch basins and drainage plan are adequate to keep control runoff and prevent spillover onto the lower road and drainage onto lower elevation lots. • Dennis Colbort 37 Clark Street; raised several concerns: what entity(HOA or City) is responsible for maintaining the open space trails, and if the HOA, can the City enforce maintenance? He urged the Board to review the minutes from 2008 when this subdivision was originally approved,there were several issues raised at that time that are still not addressed including the addition of culverts and the need for fire suppression systems. He expressed concern with possible uses of lot 27, currently zoned for industrial use. Even without road access the lot could • be used for unsightly storage inappropriate to a residential subdivision. City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 16 of 17 o Civil engineer Rich Williams acknowledged the likely need for fire suppression systems and indicated the proponent is willing to accept in-home sprinkler systems as a condition of approvals. o Builder Nick Mennino added the site has difficult topography but this challenge is a specialty of their firm.The number of homes proposed makes it economically viable to build quality homes(builder cost estimated to be$300,000 per home)that will generally push home values up in the neighborhood. • Gayle Fialho,40 Clark Street; expressed concerns about privacy and safety that could be created by the perimeter walking path.There are already homeless people and camps adjacent, the access provided by the path will attract more. Suggested the Barnes Road/Clark Street connector be designated one-way as it was last winter due to snow.The increase in homes has increased on-street parking on very narrow streets.The blind curve on Barnes Road is particularly dangerous. o Ms.Schaeffer suggested Ms. Fialho contact her City Councillor with regard to any changes in traffic direction as this matter is outside the purview of the Planning Board. • Lorraine Gagne,42 Clark Street; spoke to support comments from Ms. Fialho regarding the road safety concerns. Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to continue the public hearing to October 15, 2015, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Old/New Business • Chair Anderson advised that due to the lateness of the hour,these agenda items will be carried over to the October 15, 2015 meeting. • September 3, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes,Approval • 207 Highland Avenue—Project Update • Election for Planning Board Officers Adjournment Motion and Vote: Bill Griset made a motion to adiourn the meeting, seconded by Matt Veno. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none (0)opposed. Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 11:10pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/`SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk Approved by the Planning Board on XX/XX/2015 . City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—September 17, 2015 Page 17 of 17 Know your rights under the Open MeetingLaw M.G.L. c. 30A§18-25 and City Ordinance§2-2028 through§2-2033. • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 SEP 22 P 2: 59 Decision FILE #f Waiver From Frontage GiTY GLERA, SALEM, MASS. 23 Jackson Street and 17 Vale Street (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) September 22, 2015 A public hearing on this petition was opened on September 17, 2015 and closed on that date with the following Board Members present: Ben Anderson, Dale Yale, Kirt Rieder,Matt Veno, Noah Koretz, Helen Sides, Carole Hamilton and Bill Griset WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK request a waiver from frontage requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and under MGL Chapter 41, Section 81R, to allow less rather than the reuired 100 feet of frontage. The Planning Board voted by a vote of seven (7) in favor (Dale Yale,Kirt Rieder, Noah Koretz, Helen Sides, Carole Hamilton,and Bill Griset), and one (1) opposed (Ben Anderson) to grant the waiver from frontage requirements for 23 Jackson Street and 17 Vale Street. • The Waiver from Frontage is granted for the property located at 23 Jackson Street and 17 Vale Street, as shown on the plans titled,"Plot Plan of Land Salem,MA surveyed for Wayne and Maria Malionek,23 Jackson Street" dated December 15, 2014 and revised September 8, 2015, prepared by David P.Terenzoni,Peabody, MA. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision is on file with the City Clerk and that a copy of the Decision and plans is on file with the Planning Board. Ben Anderson, Chair The endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decisions bearing certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days bave elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that if such appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The owner or applicant shall pay the fee for recording or registering. • • y September 22, 2015 2015 SEP 22 P 2: 59 Renewal Ventures, LLC FILE N CITY CLEF I( SALEM, Mr15 c/o Scott M. Grover Tinti, Quinn, Grover& Frey, P.C. 17 Congress Street, Suite 414 Salem, MA 01970 RE: 162 & 150 Federal Street (Map 26, Lots 2 & 96) Decision of Planning Board to grant request for a six (6) month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25, 2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight(8) residential units. The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, September 17, 2015 to discuss your request for the approval of a six (6) month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25, 2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight(8) residential units. •A letter submitted by Attorney Scott M. Grover, on behalf of William Wharff, on September 10, 2015, requests allowance to extend the permits granted by the Planning Board in a Decision date-stamped September 25, 2012, for an additional period of six (6) months. The petitioner states that the additional time is necessary in order to close a new purchase agreement. The delay in closing is due to an oil leak that had spilled onto the adjacent property located at 150 Federal Street and the ongoing monitoring by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The buyer is unable to finance until DEP signs off. The action required is expected to be completed within the requested extension period. The requested six-month extension would commence on September 25, 2015, which is the expiration date of the current extension. The requested extension would expire on March 25, 2016. The Planning Board voted seven (7) in favor(Ben Anderson- Chair, Helen Sides, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno, and Carole Hamilton) and none (0) opposed and one (1) abstained due to ineligibility (Noah Koretz),to grant the approval of the requested six (6) month extension of the Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review Decision dated September 25, 2012. This determination shall become part of the record for this project. If you require further information, please contact Amanda Chiancola, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning & Community Development at (978) 619-5685. Sincerely, Ben Anderson, Chairman 0alem Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk Page 1 of 1 • S CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD ills SEP 2 FORM A- DECISION FILE # 23 JACKSON STREET and 17 VALE STREET C11Y CLERK, SALEM,H4S5 On September 17, 2015 by a unanimous vote of seven (7) in favor (Ben Anderson (Chair),Kirt Reider, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matt Veno, Noah Koretz, Carole Hamilton) and none (0) opposed to endorse "Approval under Subdivision Control Law Not Required" for the property located at 23 Glendale Street and 17 Vale Street and filed on the following described plan: "Plot of Plan of Land Salem,MA for Wayne and Maria Malionek 23 Jackson Street" dated, December 15,2014 revised September 8, 2015. 1. Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK, SALEM,MA 2. Location: 23 JACKSON STREET and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) 3. Description: Parcel B is to be joined with Lot A and become one contiguous lot and Parcel Cis to be joined with Lot 2 and become one contiguous lot. • Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. Sincerely, Ben Anderson Chair Cc.: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 AUG 31 A 4 22 NOTICE OF MEETING FILE 0 CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,September 3,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair REVISED MEETING AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. OrAUG •July 30,2015 3 at ?,'2e19W In accordance wtt � ME Chap. 30A, . III. REGULAR AGENDA Sections 18.25. Location: 23 GLENDALE STREET (Map 33 Lot 646) Application: FRED J. DION YACHT YARD Description:A public hearing for a petition requesting a Flood Hazard Overlay District • Special Permit in accordance with Sec. 8.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the reconstruction of an existing storage shed for additional boat storage measuring 60'wide, 80'long, and 26'high. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Application: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: Request for a continuation of a public hearing for a petition requesting a Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less that the required 100 feet of frontage. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: Request to approve a deadline extension for Planning Board action on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR). Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25,Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC Description: Applicant has requested a continuation of a public hearing to the next regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting to be heard on September • 17,2015 for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review,Flood Hazard City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for September 3,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 • Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District.The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically,the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC:A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer.A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan.The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building,and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Location: 9-11 DODGE STREET,217-219 WASHINGTON STREET, and 231-251 WASHINGTON STREET (Map 34,Lots 0403,0405, and 0406) Applicant: DODGE AREA,LLC • Description: A continuation of a public hearing for an amendment to the approved Site Plan Review,Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the West/South Building (tesidential mixed-use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street. As amended, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units, commercial space including a potential hotel, a parking structure with 212 parking space, associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation improvements. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Osborne Hills Realty Trust- Request for Bond Reduction Phase III Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan—Board comments and vote to approve draft Election for Planning Board Officers V. ADJOURNMENT • Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L a 30A f 18-25 and City Ordinance 12-2028 through 5 2-2033. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 W W W.SALEM.COM m CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 AUG 25 P 12: 58 FILE # NOTICE OF MEETING CITY CLERK. SALEM, MASS. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,September 3,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair AMENDED MEETING AGENDA L ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES •July 30, 2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 23 GLENDALE STREET (Map 33 Lot 646) Application: FRED J. DION YACHT YARD Description:A public hearing for a petition requesting a Flood Hazard Overlay District • Special Permit in accordance with Sec. 8.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the reconstruction of an existing storage shed for additional boat storage measuring 60'wide, 80'long, and 26' high. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Application: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: A public hearing for a petition requesting a Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less that the required 100 feet of frontage. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR). Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC Description: A public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the . North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for September 3,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 • Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit pet Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center,a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Location: 9-11 DODGE STREET, 217-219 WASHINGTON STREET, and 231-251 WASHINGTON STREET (Map 34, Lots 0403,0405, and 0406) Applicant: DODGE AREA,LLC Description: A public hearing for an amendment to the approved Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Specifically,the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the West/South Building(residential mixed-use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street. As amended, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units, commercial space including a potential hotel, a parking structure with 212 parking space, associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation improvements. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS , Osborne Hills Realty Trust- Request for Bond Reduction Phase III Draft Open Space and Recreation Plis notice posted on "Official BUlletin Board" Prty Hall, Salem, Mass. on AUG 2 5 2015 Election for Planning Board Officert 12%`J1',PM in accordance With MGL Chap. 30A, tections 18-25. V. ADJOURNMENT Knowyour righty under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A 5 18-25 and City Ordinance 5 2-2028 through J 2-2033. is 120 WASITNGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETPS 01970 • PHONE 978.619,5685 FAX 978,740.0404 WWW.SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM 00 PLANNING BOARD 1015 AUG 21 A 10: 22 NOTICE OF MEETING CITY CLErRK, SAH4M. MASS You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning bard will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,September 3, 2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES •July 30, 2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 23 GLENDALE STREET (Map 33 Lot 646) Application: FRED J. DION YACHT YARD Description:A public hearing for a petition requesting a Flood Hazard Overlay District • Special Permit in accordance with Sec. 8.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the reconstruction of an existing storage shed for additional boat storage measuring 60'wide, 80'long, and 26'high. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Application: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: A public hearing for a petition requesting a Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less that the required 100 feet of frontage. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR). Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25,Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC Description: Petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review,Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the • following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall„Salem, Mass. on AUGhl% at 161 Zk A-4in accordance with ap. 30A Sections 18-25. City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for September 3,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 • Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District.The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC:A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer.A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center,a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Location: 9-11 DODGE STREET, 217-219 WASHINGTON STREET, and 231-251 WASHINGTON STREET (Map 34,Lots 0403,0405, and 0406) Applicant: DODGE AREA,LLC Description: Petition for an amendment to the approved Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Per-lit,and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the • West/South Building(residential mixed-use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street.As amended, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units, commercial space including a potential hotel, a parking structure with 212 parking space, associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation improvements. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan Election for Planning Board Officers V. ADJOURNMENT Know our rights under the Open Meeting Low M.G.L c. 30A 5 18-25 and City Ordinance 5 2-2028 through if 2-2033. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 WWW.SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 AUG 20 A 1 '34 FILE R Public Hearing NoticCITY'CLERK, SALEM, MASS. City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK requesting a waiver of frontage requirements of the Subdivision Control Law located at 23 JACKSON STREET and 17 VALE STREET (Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) (R2 Zoning District). The public hearing will be held on Thurs, SEPT. 3, 2015 at 7:00 PM, at 120 Washington St., 3`d floor, room 313, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the • Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Dept. of Planning& Community Development, 3`d Floor, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 8/20/215 & 8/27/2015 This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on AUG 2 0 2015 at 1,3414H in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 -PHONE 978.6195685 FAx 978.740.0404- WWW.SALEM.COM F CITY OF SALEM ` PLANNING BOARD 10,5 AUG 20' A q :3w Public Hearing Notice FILE CITY CLERK, SALEM. M'SS. City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of FRED J. DION YACHT YARD, INC. for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District to allow the reconstruction of an existing storage shed for additional boat storage measuring 60' wide, 80' long, and 26' high for the property located at 23 GLENDALE STREET (Map 33 Lot 646) (R1 Zoning District). The public hearing will be held on Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning& Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. • Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 8/20/15 & 8/27/2015 This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall,Salem, Mass. on AUG2 0 5015 at 9�34.0-f in accordance with M L Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 . PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . WWW,SALEM.COM r i:y of Sul&n—1'I ?i ai?ii i#; 30^rd DRAF ( %dec£t ng 10int!V,$- Sc ptxw�he( 3, 2015 • City of Salem Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes Thursday,September 3,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313,Third Floor, at 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Anderson opened the meeting at 7:13 pm. re 11 F , d g14!, i a,.,,,n„ .0,... ,,,,:m�... .::....::. FRO Those present were: Ben Anderson, Chair, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno, Noah Koretz and Carole Hamilton. Absent: Helen Sides. Also present: Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes�� a 3 , , vv ,na :. r3 r 4,, �3 Approval . ... ..._........�..,}' .. hA 1....µ. July 30,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes Minor edits were made by the Planning Board members. • Motion and Vote:Matt Veno made a motion to approve the July 30, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes with edits seconded by Noah Koretz The vote was unanimous with eight(8) in favor and none (0) opposed Regula��Agerlda �� ,wr :I> ,a �," c $32 'jr ft � i u "i . ' ,... . . ........._. i. . .i„ r3,. Bias,. i�,.. _`:'. i 4?€'IN , iJu wuaa .a,.idi;efrull�Isii�r.,,' aw.m.'M' _g'g a Location: 23 GLENDALE STREET(Map 33 Lot 646) Applicant: FRED J. DION YACHT YARD Description: A public hearing for a petition requesting a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Sec. 8.1 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the reconstruction of an existing storage shed for additional boat storage measuring 60'wide, 80' long, and 26' high. Documents and Exhibitions: • Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Application Form stamped received August 13, 2015 • Plan of Land prepared by Patrowicz Engineering 14 Brown Street, Salem, stamped received August 13, 2015 • Elevation Plan titled Dion's Salem Harbor Proposed new Buildings, prepared by Allan Dennis, P.E., 8 Wheeler Place, Marblehead, dated March 5, 2015 Atty George W. Atkins, III of Ronan, Segal & Harrington, 59 Federal Street; presented for the applicant. Other presenters included: • • Susan St. Pierre; Principal,St. Pierre Consulting Services, 74 Bay View Avenue, Salem (waterfront permitting expertise). City of Salon—Planning Boned mr'-:m iii€tI iTP, — cit ??liir.t9, 21 i • • Fred Atkins; owner, 23 Glendale Street, Salem. Atty Atkins introduced the project with a brief overview. Fred J. Dion Yacht Yard has been in business in Salem for 100 years, at the same location and managed by the same family.The location, deep in Salem Harbor is generally sheltered from high velocity wave action, and is periodically subjected to moderate flooding during storms and extreme tides. Existing structures for boat storage are designed to survive periodic flooding, with earth/gravel floors. Other factors that affect the site and influenced the positioning of the replacement building include: • City storm drain lines that run from Glendale Street into the harbor • City water line crosses the site of the new building and it will need to be moved. • A private hydrant will also be relocated with siting advice from the City Fire Department • The only utility inside the proposed building will be electricity Atty Atkins advised this project has appeared before Zoning Board of Appeals and the Conservation Commission and received requested approvals from these Boards. The proponent has also met with neighbors to discuss the positioning and height of the proposed new building to avoid impacting view corridors. Board Discussion: The Board received satisfactory answers from Atty Atkins to a range of questions: • Board noted the size of new building is nearly double, what is the use of the building that requires this expansion? Expand boat storage capacity. • • What issues required relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)? Nonconforming structures on the lot require a ZBA special permit. • Will chemicals or toxins be stored in the proposed new building? No,there is a separate area for these. • Board noted a couple of parking spots along the fence will be displaced by the new building. Can this parking be accommodated elsewhere on the lot?Yes. o The Board followed up with a discussion indicating concern that employees may be parking on Glendale Street, which is needed for residents. Employees do not use Glendale Street. o Board asked if the proponent was seeking to eliminate some parking on Glendale Street (currently both sides allowed) to provide easier access for trucks moving boats. Atty Atkins responded the proponent has no desire to disrupt the neighborhood and is not seeking any change to parking practices. He pointed out that expansion of boat storage capability will reduce the number of boats being taken out of the yard and along Glendale Street. o As required by the Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit,the Board asked if the building will create any changes to vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow within the site. Atty Atkins advised that other than the 1-2 lost parking spaces previously discussed, there will be no change to site navigation. • Susan St Pierre identified the 100' buffer zone line on the map, which determines Conservation Commission jurisdiction. Planning Board review is driven by the flood hazard zone (entire site). • 01'y of Rr)-rd' IDRPFi Meeting iinutrc,s--`aNf�rnb�, g,2015 paoi; (if t • Board asked about the height of the new building and does this create any changes to Building C. Atty Atkins advised the new building height is 26'flat roofed. No changes are needed to Building C. Chair Anderson opened the meeting for public comment: • Josh Turiel, City Councillor Ward 5, 238 Lafayette Street, asked about the materials to be used for construction?Atty Atkins advised no specific choices made yet, but he identified the basic ideas visible on the preliminary drawings. • Tom Furey, City Councillor At Large, 36 Dunlap Street; spoke in favor of supporting a long-time Salem business who has proved themselves to be a good neighbor. Mr. Furey expressed appreciation that this business is reinvesting and staying in Salem. Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton) and none(0)opposed. Board Discussion: Chair Anderson reviewed the list of conditions per ordinance that must be considered by the Planning Board for the Flood Hazard Overlay District. After consideration of all issues,the Board determined all conditions have been met. Motion and ROLL CALL Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to approve a Flood Hazard Overlay District • Special Permit to allow reconstruction of an existing storage shed, with the following findings: • The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. • There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lots(s)caused by either overspill from waterbodies or high runoff. • Utilities, including gas, electricity, fuel, water and sewage disposal, shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking,short-circuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. • Where the proposed use will be located within a coastal high hazard area (Zone VE on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps), the Planning Board shall also find the following conditions to be ul filled• o New structures or substantial improvements shall be located landward of the reach of mean high tide. o The support of new structures or substantial improvements shall not be, in whole or in Part, by the use of fill. seconded by Carole Hamilton. The vote was unanimous with eight(8) in favor(Mr. Anderson Mr. Clarke Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none (0)opposed. Location: 23 JACKSON and 17 VALE STREET(Map 25 Lot 661 and Map 25 Lot 660) Applicant: WAYNE and MARIA MALIONEK • i,l"4`{Oi.�r3lc^^.iT?—I'Ic 1111i(";jy ?C3�}ri1 CRAP i Meotirg iviiout'i,s Sz-p!t£:'mhcf"U', 201.5 4 of 7 is Description: A public hearing for a petition requesting a Waiver From Frontage Requirements of the Subdivision Control Law to allow less that the required 100 feet of frontage. Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law(ANR). Documents and Exhibitions: Correspondence dated August 25, 2015,from Atty Scott Grover of Tinti, Quinn, Grover& Frey, 27 Congress Street; on behalf of the applicant,with a request for continuation to September 17th for the public hearing on the request for a Waiver from Frontage Requirements; and a continuation until September 22nd for the Board vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to required approval under the Subdivision Control Law(ANR). Board Discussion: Ms. Schaeffer advised the later date for the ANR provides time to meet the state requirements of recording at the City Clerk Office. Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to continue the public hearing on the request for Waiver From Frontage Requirements until September 17, 2015, seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton) and none (0)opposed. • Motion and Vote: Noah Koretz made a motion to continue the Board discussion and decision on the ANR until September 22, 2015, seconded by Bill Griset The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor Mr. Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms Hamilton)and none (0)opposed. Ih,xE�&.Va'-sn7 tl ar— ¢ K=r 3+ ra c r;{ `t'r fN TM „lryr,., y `�� x� �.,..;iii.nu..Y.� fl ' uhSEr`—'t arc-�'an4...: Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET(Map 25, Lot 74)and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District.The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC)Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically,the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use.The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the • premises to reflect the new plan.The applicant proposes to construct two DPAFT Mectirlg; f+. hlut s—cera, ether 3, 2015 Page -,of • separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Documents and Exhibitions: • Two additional public comment letters received: o Dated August 18, 2015,from the Federal Street Neighborhood Association o Dated August 7, 2015, from Rachel N. Lutts, 92 Orne Street, Salem • Correspondence dated August 28, 2015,from Atty Joseph Correnti, of Serafini, Darling& Correnti, LLP, 63 Federal Street; on behalf of the applicant, with a request for continuation to September 17th. Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to continue the public hearing to September 17 2015 seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson Ms Sides Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms Hamilton) and none (0) opposed. � i9` I UNHu k.'`fi�a'` 2C UMEE ca Location: 9-11 DODGE STREET, 217-219 WASHINGTON STREET, and 231-251 WASHINGTON STREET(Map 34, Lots 0403,0405, and 0406) Applicant: DODGE AREA, LLC Description: Continuation of the public hearing for an amendment to the approved Site Plan • Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the West/South Building (residential mixed-use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street. As amended, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units,commercial space including a potential hotel, a parking structure with 212 parking space, associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation improvements. Documents and Exhibitions: • Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Site Plan Review, Flood hazard District Special Permit and Stormwater Management Permit Decision, dated December 22, 2014. • Decision draft with amendments Seth Zeren, Development Manager for RCG, LLC, 17 Ivaloo Street, Ste 100, Somerville, presented for the applicant. Mr. Zeren offered to answer any additional questions the Board might have, noting that the previous presentation at July 30 meeting seemed to address all issues. He offered some corrections that are reflected in the decision draft: • the building is 178,000 square feet, non-garage (vs. 160,000 square feet, non-garage, in the original decision), • the number of apartments is 68 including work/live units(vs. 84 units in the original decision). • City rc(`ale°rr, - Pl1r3nirq,1 Boars, i'," !_ Cr,i7 • Ms. Schaeffer reported the City Building Inspector has no comments or additional conditions for this project. Chair Anderson invited public comments. No public comments were offered. Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton) and none (0)opposed. Board Review of the Original Decision and Amendments: The Board reviewed the proposed amendments and draft decision in detail. No edits were made to the draft decision. • Ms. Hamilton asked to know the proponent's recourse in the event market conditions do not support construction of the hotel and the developer chooses"option B", the alternative of building residential units. o Mr. Zeren replied the proponent is obligated to return to the Planning Board and present specifics on the residential program. Motion and ROLL CALL Vote: Noah Koretz made a motion to approve the Amendments to the previously approved Site Plan Review Decision (dated December 22, 2014), Planned United Development Special Permit, North River Canal Corridor District Special Permit and Flood Hazard District Special Permit and • seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Mr. Clarke Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none (0)opposed.The amendments are hereby incorporated with the original decision and made a part of these minutes. • Osborne Hills Realty Trust—Request for Bond Reduction Phase III Ms. Schaeffer reported the City received correspondence dated August 27, 2015,from Paul DiBiase, Trustee of Obsorne Hills Realty Trust,47 Marlborough Rod, Salem, with updates on the current status of the project and a request to reduce the surety bond by$32,000.This would leave a balance of$159,004. The reduction is due to completed work to install street lights/poles and electricity. The City's contractor, Fay Spofford &Thorndike, LLC (5 Burlington Woods Dr. #210, Burlington, 01803), has confirmed the work has been done and the requested reduction amount is reasonable. After brief discussion and clarification that Ms. Schaeffer was reporting on the project in her role as City Planner,the Board agreed to authorize the requested reduction. Motion and ROLL CALL Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to authorize the reduction of the Phase 111 Surety Bond for Oborne Hills Realty Trust nu$32,000, leaving a balance of$159,004,seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed.The amendments are hereby incorporated with the original decision and made a part of these minutes. S • Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan Update City«fSak,-Hi --Planning Beraud DRi`ia i rr`Cf hn( , iMinut!:.s-`^ n rnbtir 3, 201.1.; of Documents& Exhibitions: City of Salem Open Space and Recreation Plan Updated 2015—2022 DRAFT, prepared by Gale Associates, Inc., 163 Libbey Parkways, Weymouth,02189 The Department of Community Planning and Development has requested a letter from the Planning Board in support of the City's Open Space and Recreation Plan,to be included with the submission of said plan to the State. The Board discussed two specific observations in relation to the City's management of open/green space. • The Board unanimously agreed to recommend there be language added to this document to address any removal of open/green space from public inventory due to parking.The possible conversion of state-granted land at the intersection of old Bridge Street and the Sgt.James Ayube II Memorial Drive to parking primarily to be used by a private business was cited as an example issue.The conversion of any publicly owned green space to parking, especially space given to the City by the state for mitigation purposes, should be scrutinized and subject to public review. Motion and ROLL CALL Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to endorse the Open Space and Recreation Plan with additional comments to be attached, seconded by Dale Yale The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale Mr. Griset Mr. Veno Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none (0)opposed. • Election for Planning Board Officers The Board's preference is to conduct this business with all members present; it was tabled until the next meeting. Ad'Journment2„1 a,J«, Clni� Fi Sika v Y � Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to odiourn the meeting, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr.Anderson, Ms Sides Mr. Clarke Mr. Rieder Ms. Yale Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno, Mr. Koretz and Ms. Hamilton)and none(0)opposed. Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 830pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk �tl`.ys'ay A4A �'�"94X (IYC WNrY"`WfMa "' Approved by the Planning BoaMKrd on XX/XX/20`15 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A§18-25 and City Ordinance§2-2028 through§2-2033. x CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD • FILE li Decision CITY CLERK. SALEM, MASS. Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit 23 Glendale Street (Map 33 Lot 646) September 15, 2015 Fred J. Dion Yacht Yard, Inc. 23 Glendale Street Salem,MA 01970 RE: Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision On Thursday, September 3,2015, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a public hearing at the request of FRED J.DION YACHT YARD, INC, for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, for the property located at 23 Glendale Street (Map 33 Lot 646). The applicant proposes to reconstruct and expand an existing storage shed for additional boat storage measuring 60'wide, 80'long, and 26'high. The public heating was closed on September 3, 2015. • Flood Hazard Overlay Special Permit Findings: The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the Flood Hazard District Special Permit Application: 1. The proposed uses comply in all respect to the uses and provisions of the underlying zoning district. 2. A portion of the site is within the 100-year FEMA coastal floodplain. There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property,particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lots(s) caused by either the overspill from water bodies or high runoff 3. All utilities including gas, electricity, fuel,water and sewage disposal will be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking,leaking, short-circuiting,grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. 4. The proposed development will not be located within a coastal high hazard area (Zone VE on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps). At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on September 3, 2015 the Planning 4Woard voted by nine (9) in favor (Ben Anderson (Chair), Helen Sides, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, 2 • Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno, Carole Hamilton and Noah Koretz), and none (0) opposed to a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform to the plans entitled`Plan of Land for the Proposed Reconstruction of a Boar Storage Building, Proposed Building"D" for Fred J,Dion Yacht Yard, Inc. 23 Glendale Street Salem, MA" dated August 7, 2015 prepared by Patrowicz Land Development Engineering and elevation plans entitled "Dion's Salem Harbor, Glendale Street, Salem, MA Proposed New Building" dated March 5, 2015 prepared by Allan Dennis,Marblehead,MA. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board i 3. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. • b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of demolition and construction of the project. c. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling, blasting or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site,must be located completely on the site g. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant to the Building Inspector for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Included in this • plan, but not limited to, shall be information regarding how the construction equipment will be stored, a 3 description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the • construction employees will park their vehicles. 4. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City,at the expense of the applicant, his successors or assigns, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to controlled construction,which requires oversight by licensed engineers and architects.Accordingly,it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site improvements related to the project located within the public way,including all utility connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the expense associated with a Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of bouts and at a customary rate for such service. 5. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 6. Building Inspector All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector consistent with the current version of the State Building Code,Massachusetts Architectural Access Board regulations and Massachusetts Energy Codes. • 7. Board of Health a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name, address, and telephone number of the project (site) manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. b. A lead and asbestos inspection to be conducted prior to any demolition or construction. If lead or asbestos is found it shall be removed by contractors licensed for such removal. c. The developer shall ensure that pests do not negatively impact the neighborhood as a consequence of construction work. The developer shall submit pest control reports including a pest survey and treatment actions. d. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent. e. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. f. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control during construction, • such as negative air pressure and physical barriers between occupied areas and construction areas. 4 g. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for firefighting. h. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. i. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health. j. The developer shall test for Radon and install Radon mitigation system prior to the issuance of an Occupancy Permit. k. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. S. Utilities a. Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. • b. All electrical utilities for the site shall be underground. c. A plan for sidewalks shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 9. Conservation Commission All work shall comply with the requirements of the Conservation Commission. 10. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. 11. As-Built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance • with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy;as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. 5 . To the extent that construction work has been completed sufficient for a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety but that the As-Built plans have not yet been fully completed (for said portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety), the applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an amount and for subject to approval of the City Planner to ensure that the As-Built Plans are completed within a reasonable timeframe. 14. Violations Violations of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board,unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied,is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant,his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Ben Anderson, Chair • The endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decisions bearing certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that if such appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The owner or applicant sballpay the fee for recording or registering. • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Decision ' 1015 SEP -q All: 12 FILE ; Amendment to a Planned Unit Development Special Permit;�i�t� 4in R6iew(',5�. Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and Stormwater Management Permit 9-11 DODGE STREET, 217-219 &231-251 WASHINGTON STREET (Map 34, Lots 403, 405, and 406) 9/9/2015 Dodge Area, LLC 17 Ivaloo Street, Suite 100 Somerville, MA 02143 RE: Amendments to a Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and Stormwater Management Permit Decision for the proposed development at 9- 11 Dodge Street, 217-219 &231-251 Washington Street. On July 30, 2015, the Planning Board of the City of Salem (hereinafter referred to as the "Planning • Board"or"the Board") opened a public hearing regarding the application of DODGE AREA LLC (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant" and/or"Owner") for an amendment to the previously approved Planned Unit Development Special Permit, Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard District Special Permit, and Stormwater Management Permit Decision for the property located at 9-11 Dodge St., 217-219 Washington St., and 231-251 Washington St. (Map 34, Lots 0403, 0405, and 0406). The approved project included two possible use programs: A) Base Program the new construction of an approximately 190,000 square foot mixed-use development with 111 hotel rooms, 84 residential units (including live/work units), and approximately 20,000 square feet of commercial space; and Program B: Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use: 190,000 square foot mixed-use development with no hotel and 145 residential units (including live/work units), and approximately 28,000 square feet of commercial space. Both use programs included a minimum of 245 parking spaces of which a minimum of 38 parking spaces will be made available to the public. Specific amendments proposed are the following: - Remove the top floor of the West/South Building(residential mixed-use). - Remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage - Increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street. 2 As amended, the applicant proposes two possible use programs: A) Base Program the new construction of • an approximately 178,000 square foot mixed- use development with 111 hotel rooms, 68 residential units (including live/work units), and approximately 23,000 square feet of commercial space; and Program B: Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use: 178,000 square foot mixed-use development with no hotel and up to 116 residential units (including live/work units), and approximately 30,000 square feet of commercial space. Both use programs include 212 parking spaces of which a minimum of 38 parking spaces will be made available to the public. The public hearing was continued to September 3, 2015 and closed on this date. The Planning Board, after a public hearing and review of submitted materials and testimony,hereby finds that the proposed amendment to the previously approved project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 7.3 Planned Unit Development, as follows: 7.3.1 Purpose—Planned unit development is designed to provide various types of land use which can be combined in compatible relationship with each other as part of a totally planned development. As proposed, the Planned Unit Development (PUD) incorporates a precise development plan for two use programs; Base Program A: 178,000 square foot new-mixed use development with 111 hotel rooms, 68 residential units (including live-work units), and approximately 23,000 square feet of commercial space; and Program B: Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use: 178,000 square foot mixed-use development with • no hotel and up to 116 residential units (including live-work units), and approximately 30,000 square feet of commercial space (Program"A" and Program `B"). Both use programs provide a mix of uses that are compatible with each other, thereby meeting the purpose and intent of good zoning practices and the master plan of the City of Salem. 7.3.2 Applicability—The proposed development parcel is at least five (5) times the required minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet in the B5, Central Development District. The lot size is 65,173 square feet+/- substantially exceeding the requirement of 10,000 square feet. The underlying zoning district of the proposed development parcel is B5 Central Development District, which is eligible for PUD treatment. 7.3.3 Uses—The proposed uses, as included in Program A and Program B, as described in this decision in Section 7.3.1, are allowed in a PUD development. 7.3.3.1 - Both proposed Planned Unit Development use programs contain multi-family residential development that is compatible with adjacent existing residential development and potential development of the surrounding neighborhood because adjacent parcels are either zoned B5 or R3 (across the street). 7.3.3.2 The applicant has submitted a plan for the total property and has in clear detail by engineering and architectural specifications and drawings shown the area to be developed and the means that will be . employed to protect the abutting property and the health safety, and welfare and privacy enjoyed thereon. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . WWW.SALEM.COM 3 The project and both use programs have been peer reviewed by civil and traffic engineers who have • confirmed that there will not be negative impacts on abutting property subject to conditions contained within this decision. The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the Planned Unit Development Special Permit application: 1. The proposed amendment to the previously approved planned unit development is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the master plan of the City of Salem as this project will add vitality to the downtown, provide a mix of residential units and commercial spaces, improve the streetscape, improve pedestrian accessibility, and generate tax revenue for the City. 2. The mixture of uses in the planned unit development is determined to be sufficiently advantageous to render it appropriate to depart from the normal requirements of the district. Specifically, this is a significant mixed-use development of approximately 178,000 square feet that will greatly enhance this section of the downtown. The mix of housing, including live-work space, commercial use, and a potential hotel will add to the vibrancy, vitality, and aesthetics of downtown, providing substantial public benefit. 3. The planned unit development would not result in a net negative environmental impact, based on the • information from the Environmental Impact Statement and plans, and the review of the project by the Planning Board's civil and traffic engineering consultants. The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the Flood Hazard District Special Permit Application: 1. The proposed uses comply in all respect to the uses and provisions of the underlying zoning district and the Planned Unit Development provision. 2. A portion of the site is within the 100-year FEMA coastal floodplain. There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lots(s) caused by either the overspill from water bodies or high runoff. In the case of a 100-year flood, the upper parking deck will remain accessible during a flooding event. The regrading of Dodge Street will allow circulation to the other areas of the site. Adequate drainage will be constructed to drain the lowest level of the garage should it fill during a flood event. Additionally, the Development Plan includes raising a portion of the site, so that the finished floor level is located above the 100- year FEMA coastal floodplain elevation. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . WWW,SALEM.COM 4 3. All utilities including gas, electricity, fuel, water and sewage disposal will be located and • constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, short-circuiting, grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. The Development Plan and project narrative indicate that all utilities and essential equipment will be located above floodplain level. 4. The proposed development will not be located within a coastal high hazard area(Zone VE on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps). At a regularly scheduled meeting of the PlanningBoard held don September 3, 2015, the Planning Board voted by a vote of eight(8) in favor (Mr.Anderson,Mr. Clarke Mr.Rieder Ms.Yale Mr. r' G iset, Mr.Veno,Mr.Koretz and Ms.Hamilton), and none (0) opposed to approve the proposed amendments subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform to the plans entitled "Salem Gateway: Washington and Dodge Street Infrastructure Improvements, Salem, MA Plans 13-107" C1.0 to C7.1 prepared by Design Consultants, Inc. dated July 10, 2014 (Revised October 6;November 4), "North Building Residential/Commercial Schematic Plan" dated December 3, 2014, prepared by RCG LLC, Landscape Plans L-I to L-11 prepared by Landworks Studio, and Lighting Plans LCIa and LCIc prepared by Available Light; Architectural plans AA100.1- 106, 300-303 prepared by Khalsa Design, Inc. revised on July 1, 2015. • 2. Original Decision All conditions set forth in the original decision for Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit and Flood Hazard District Special Permit dated December 11, 2014 shall remain and be adhered to by the applicant, unless explicitly eliminated or amended in this decision. 3. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 4. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. Exterior construction work shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:00 PM and 8:00 AM the following day on weekdays or at any time on Sundays or Holidays. Any interior work conducted during these times will not involve heavy machinery which could generate disturbing noises. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of • construction of the project. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 . TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM 5 • c. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not track silt on public ways. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site or parked at another off-street parking lot. g. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Included in this plan, but not limited to, shall be information regarding how the construction equipment will be stored, a description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the construction employees will park their vehicles. • h. A Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and Police Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The Traffic Management Plan shall include the proposed communication methods, including notification to the Building Salem Coordinator, to keep the public informed regarding activities affecting vehicular and pedestrian circulation during construction. i.All sidewalks,roadways, utilities, landscaping, etc. damaged during construction shall be replaced or repaired to their pre-construction condition, or better. 5. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department in accordance with the applicable fire prevention regulations. The locations of all fire hydrants shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. 6. Building Inspector All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector consistent with the current version of the State Building Code, Massachusetts Architectural Access Board regulations and Massachusetts Energy Codes. 7. Board of Health • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM 6 a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the • name, address, and telephone number of the project(site) manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible for the site certifies that soil and ground water on the entire site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use. Since there are individual parcels combined into one site only that parcel(s) that is issued a DEP tracking Number is expected to meet this condition c. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer. i d. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to assess and exterminate pests in the area prior to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent. A pest control management plan shall be developed and submitted to the Health Agent prior to the start of any demolition work. e. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. • f. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and street sweeping which will occur during construction. g. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and removal of debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated during demolition and/or construction. h. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for firefighting. i. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations, including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. j. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill material needed for the project. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM 7 k. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in a sound manner as described to the Board of Health and in compliance with existing Federal, State and Local laws. 1. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. m. In developments of 10 or more units, the developer shall develop a grease management plan to prevent grease from entering the city sewers that is in compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer n. Salem sits in a Radon Zone 1 and the risk of radon entering buildings is extremely. Therefore, the installation of radon mitigation systems is strongly recommended. 8. Department of Public Services All work shall comply with the requirements of the Department of Public Services. 8. Conservation Commission All work shall comply with the requirements of the Conservation Commission as the proposed site is located partially within the FEMA flood zone. 9. Lighting a. Any light used to illuminate parking area shall be arranged as to reflect light away from adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent the construction on the Project or portions of the Project are completed such that a Certificate of Occupancy could be issued prior to completion of all exterior lighting, for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety, the applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an amount and form subject to approval of the City Planner to ensure that the work is completed within a reasonable timeframe. The applicant may submit requests to the City Planner for partial releases of said surety based on work completed. 10. HVAC If an HVAC unit is located on the roof or site, it shall be visually screened. The method for screening the unit shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to installation. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 . TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . WWW,SALEM.COM i 8 11. Noise • HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further mitigate noise emanating from the HVAC units(s) if the Board of Health receives any complaints. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the guideline for reviewing such noise is that the broadband sound level should not increase se by more than 10 dB AO above the ambient levels measured at the property line. 12. Landscaping a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Trees shall be a minimum diameter of 3 %"dbh (diameter breast height). c. Maintenance of all landscaping, excepting street trees that will become property of the City of Salem, shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs (including street trees) for a two (2) year period. d. Final completed landscaping shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the construction is finished such that a Certificate of Occupancy could be issued for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety and that the weather conditions (e.g., late fall, winter or early spring) are • such that the landscaping cannot reasonably be finished, the applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an amount and form subject to approval of the City Planner to ensure that the work is completed within a reasonable timeframe. The applicant may submit requests to the City Planner for partial releases of said surety based on work completed. 13.Maintenance a. Refuse removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. "Refuse removal" includes recycling, which shall be the responsibility of the owner,his successors or assigns. The owner shall provide adequate facilities to ensure all users are able to recycle their trash. Owner is to enter into a contract with a company of the owner's choice to arrange pick-up of recyclable material. A copy of this contract is to be submitted to the City Engineer. For clarity, this provision does not apply to publicly owned rights of way and streets. b. The developer, his successors or assigns shall be responsible for the shoveling and/or snowplowing of the sidewalk for all building frontage along Dodge Street, Washington Street, and Dodge Street Court. c. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. • 1"WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM 9 14. As-built Plans • As-built Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. A completed tie card, a blank copy(available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy; as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. To the extent that construction work has been completed sufficient for a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety but that the As-Built plans have not yet been fully completed (for said portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety), the applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an amount and form subject to approval of the City Planner to ensure that the As-Built Plans are completed within a reasonable timeframe. 15. Clerk of the Works • A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the expense of the applicant, his successors or assigns, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to controlled construction, which requires oversight by licensed engineers and architects. Accordingly, it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site improvements related to the project located within the public way, including all utility connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the expense associated with a Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of hours and at a customary rate for such service. 16. Violations Violations of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 17. Special Conditions a. Stormwater Management Permit Applicant to revise Stormwater Management Report with O&M Plan to incorporate appropriate detention and groundwater infiltration system, and submit to City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a Foundation or Building Permit. Revised design to detain roof runoff must demonstrate that groundwater recharge and pre and post runoff rates meet requirements of Stormwater Standards for non- tidal discharge. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM 10 • b. Existing Utility Relocation 1. Applicant to revise site plans to include replacement of remaining Dodge Street drain pipe and submit to the City Planner and City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, applicant to complete additional field investigations on the interceptor sewers and South River drainage conduit, and revise the utility relocation plans to include the location of all utilities to be relocated and/or installed between the proposed building and the South River conduit with adequate plan, profile, and cross-section views with sufficient detail to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the utilities may be relocated and are constructible within the proposed utility corridor. Plans shall include additional detail of water replacement and connections to existing water main at each end of proposed relocation for adequate valving and thrust restraint to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and also delineate and formalize the proposed easement layout and language for utilities to be located on Applicant's property. 3. Applicant to submit additional information from their geotechnical engineer to the City Engineer regarding proposed vibrations from pile foundation adjacent to Dodge Street interceptor sewer and • modify the foundation design or protect/rehabilitate/replace sewer prior to issuance of a Foundation Permit. Applicant to complete CCTV pipeline inspection of the Dodge Street interceptor sewer before and after completing foundation work and submit to City Engineer, and, if required,protect/rehabilitate/replace sewer line to address deficiencies or defects observed. c. Utilities Applicant to submit additional information to the City Planner and City Engineer once architectural plans are finalized, to demonstrate the proposed fire hydrants and connections meet requirements of Salem Fire Department and that proposed sewer, drain, and water service connections are in agreement between the architectural and civil plans, and that the design will collect rainfall runoff and detain water as modeled in the revised Stormwater Management Report, prior to issuance P � p of a Building Permit. d. Site Development Plans Applicant to submit additional information to the City Engineer on the number and location of all existing utility services to all buildings, and revise plans to identify the number and location of all utilities to be capped or plugged. Applicant is to complete the abandonment of the service connections prior to issuance of a Demolition Permit. e. Traffic 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM I1 1. Applicant to install a Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon (RRFB) system, or Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, to supplement the proposed mid-block crosswalk across Washington Street at Dodge Street. A detailed design and specifications, including but not limited to system layout, number of beacons, push button locations, conduit and pull box layout, post and foundation information, power source, and system operations shall be provided to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Installation to be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. In addition to the Washington Street north leg crosswalk, the proponent is proposing to upgrade the existing crosswalk across the east leg of Washington Street. This crosswalk to be enhanced with Pedestrian Warning signs (WI 1-2, WI 6-7p), similar to the other proposed crosswalks. Installation to be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. At the intersection of Dodge Street and Dodge Street Court the proposed Pedestrian Warning signs(W I 1-2, W1 6-7p) are not necessary for the Dodge Street Court approaches since they are Stop sign controlled and are to be eliminated. 4. Pedestrian Warning signs (WI 1-2, W16-7p)must be provided for the crosswalk across Dodge Street and installation to be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. The Applicant to install crosswalks that meet the City standard, which is an inlaid preformed thermoplastic asphalt pavement marking system. The proponent shall coordinate with the City Engineer in regard to the exact specifications. The Applicant to coordinate with the City Planner regarding the specific pattern. 6. It is expressly noted that certain proposed parking and roadway circulation changes are subject to approval of Council in accordance with the Salem Traffic Ordinance. L Salem Redevelopment Authority All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Redevelopment Authority. g. Notification Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall notify the City of Salem and all abutters within 300 feet if the development proceeds with alternate use program `B"as described in this decision in Section 7.3.1. • h. Future Changes 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM 12 Once the final Certificate of Occupancy is issued, the approval of the alternate program of uses shall • expire and the Zoning Ordinance will govern any proposed change of use. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. ?�n Q,4 -. Ben Anderson, Chairman • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • TEL: 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 ' WWW.SALEM.COM IolaCITY OF SALEM IolaPLANNING BOARD Inn JUL 23 P 4: Ob NOTICE OF MEETING FILE 0 CITY CLEM, SALEM, MASS. You are hereby notifred that the Salem planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,July 30,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, AM Ben Anderson, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL This notice posted on "Oficial B99ullggetigqn�� rBoard" II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ate 4Ht�(a�11 mn accordancJUL tfi IGiGT,Chap. 30A, • June 18,2015 Sections 18-25. III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 20 WEBB,4 SZETELA LANE, 3 FORT AVENUE, 1 FORT AVENUE, I REAR FORT AVENUE (Map 41, Lots 245,244,235,236,243) Application: CITY OF SALEM Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR),proposing to combine five (5) lots to create one (1) lot. Location: 36 FELT STREET (Map 27 Lot 608) Application: ESTATE OF JAMES TREADWELL Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR),proposing to take away area from one lot and add that area to another lot. Location: 46-48 SCHOOL STREET (Map 27,Lot 7) (Map 27,Lot 5) Applicant: MICHAEL BECKER Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control Law (ANR),proposing to divide a portion of the existing two lots at 46 and 48 School Street (Map 27,Lot 7)(Map 27,Lot 5) to create one additional lot. Location: 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25,Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) Applicant: HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET,LLC Description: Petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan City of Salem Planning Board Agenda for July 30,2015 Meeting Page 2 of 2 Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District.The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District (NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically,the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC:A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center,a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the comer of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. Location: 9-11 DODGE STREET,217-219 WASHINGTON STREET, and 231-251 WASHINGTON STREET (Map 34,Lots 0403,0405, and 0406) Applicant: DODGE AREA,LLC Description: Petition for an amendment to the approved Site Plan Review,Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the West/South Building (residential mixed-use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street. As amended,the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units, commercial space including a potential hotel,a parking structure with 212 parking space, associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation improvements. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan Update Election for Planning Board Officers V. ADJOURNMENT Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting I aw M.G.L c. 30A ff 18-25 and City Ordinance ff 2-2028 through ff 2-2033. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 WWW.SALEM.COM COMM • T CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �MlNSD� KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 4 FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GooNIN DVNcAN,AlCP DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner DATE: July 24,2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting—July 30,2015 Please find the following in the file: Agenda for July 30,2015 Planner's Memo APPROVAL OF MINUTES • • June 18,2015 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 20 WEBB, 4 SZETELA LANE,3 FORT AVENUE, 1 FORT AVENUE, 1 REAR FORT AVENUE (Map 41, Lots 245, 244,235,236,243) Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law (ANR),proposing to combine five (5) lots to create one (1) lot. The City owns five (5) parcels all with Site &Activity Use limitations and would like to consolidate these parcels into one to reduce associated AUL fees incurred by the City. 2. 36 FELT STREET (Map 27 Lot 608) Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under the Subdivision Control Law(ANR),proposing to take away area from one lot and add that area to another lot. 3. 46-48 SCHOOL STREET (Map 27, Lot 7) (Map 27, Lot 5) Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control Law (ANR), proposing to divide a portion of the existing two lots at 46 and 48 School Street (Map 27,Lot 7)(Map 27,Lot 5) to create one additional lot. City of Salem: Planning Board Staff Memorandum—7/24/ 2015 Page 2 of 2 4. 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street (Map 15, Lot 305) HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC Petition for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review,Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District(NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC:A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer.A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan. The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building,and a five-story mixed-use residential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape layout. • 5. 9-11 DODGE STREET, 217-219 WASHINGTON STREET, and 231-251 WASHINGTON STREET (Map 34, Lots 0403, 0405, and 0406) Petition for an amendment to the approved Site Plan Review,Planned Unit Development Special Permit,and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit. Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the West/South Building (residential mixed- use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street.As amended, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units, commercial space including a potential hotel, a parking structure with 212 parking space,associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation improvements. I. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan Tom Devine,Senior Planner,will speak briefly about the City's draft Open Space&Recreation Plan. Enclosed is a draft plan for review and comment.The Planning Board will be asked for a letter of support to submit to the state recommending formal approval by September 3,2015. ��CONDITq,9 City of Salem — Meeting Sign-In Sheet • gni d�� c 1 s , Board PIQ"Y\i QoG1�a Date Name Mailing Address Phone # E-mail All A?,J ��ve �q (, iokejps J . a-;a-5g4•L}3 (00 C� bbac/O//Oaa<csi,, 6 / 5/�/��5coa7�Jr�iS�Cdy r L L( CAAt6M J •E S DLL I � CO At�r S - O/ i �7� 2 (4 `/l!1/(• Cmiti �/1N T�1�,55P// /(e �f�Y102/QL �� `(�BQ79-5-1.33 JQ�cSSf `�cstY} •C0� Zxsli'e. Lem w /88 fedcra� $17-775- 87Y? /asb2/arsgve@hoer � r r R'i IMo�l�c�eY.� Qz�-��u �D�'a c �• �� 1►��•� M ASK o:Dcw . 7 L�Nf� St e)14. 109LI C f Sei N; ckJ_r -7vy-1VV J�r✓7 �Xir, ec` Cwl�f.ki 02 cl��7`�� ' I U� l'�ii/•'�f— oL q - '54. \ `� 2fTNll2 �•-Awu cpP&-t le., acA�6fxuard •4°1 (,AkCall" \31219 12- bdi4uward a( I. • V•��P r 2 tGcjabvK,,A g787Vgol� m,Ylpi v CORO--\ a,)c Page of City of Salem — Meeting Sign-In Sheet Ai Board Date Name Mailing Address Phone # E-mail 3r FG,NIL St gkt�103 Case7/&yx �uhntr��,dir� es ( %oA Q qk-144 L2 ash ?a O r r�2 S-f , l-? a Y Ah)lb, t V_' tL f (,gT , ST, 4Z x[7366(,354 ��a nr�r1AC, G.J. 9)�"l 67y3hIu� KI JS v� moo S� 14 oZ iE (v�uls [n� r, 70 lig -2 r e r bV Page of x CITY OF SALEM 1 Ail • PLANNING BOARD 1015 JUL I b Ala 36 FILE # CITY CLERK, SALEM,MrASS. Public Hearing Notice City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of DODGE AREA, LLC. for an amendment to the approved Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Special Permit, and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit for the property located at 9-11 Dodge St., 217-219 Washington St., and 231-251 Washington St. (Map 34, Lots 0403, 0405, and 0406). Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove the top floor of the West/South Building (residential mixed-use), and remove the deepest portion of the underground parking garage and to increase the depth of the in-line retail along lower Washington Street. As amended, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 160,000 square foot mix-use development with 64 residential units, commercial space including a potential hotel, a parking structure with 212 parking space, associated landscaping and pedestrian and transportation • improvements. The public hearing will be held on Thurs,July 30,2015 at 7:00 PM, at 120 Washington St, 3`d floor, room 313, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Mass. General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Dept. of Planning & Community Development, 3`d Floor, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board Know Your Rigbts under the Open Meehug Lau M.G.L c. 30A 5 18-25 and City Or&nance If 2-2028 through 2-2033. This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" Cit Hall, Salem, Mass. on JUL. 1 � 2015 at U, fn in accordance with GL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.6195655 FAX 978.740,0404 • WWW.SALEhl.CO:M CITY OF SALEM r ' PLANNING BOARD .+nrt uu 16 A 0 N City of Salem FILE # CITY CLEFIK, SALEM, MASS. Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of HIGH ROCK BRIDGE STREET, LLC for amendments to the approved Site Plan Review, Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Special Permits associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District in accordance with the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: Section 9.5 Site Plan Review, Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District. The applicant requests the following Special Permit associated with the North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District(NRCC) Sections 8.4.5 and 8.4.13 North River Canal Corridor Neighborhood Mixed Use District). Specifically, the applicant requests a Special Permit per Sec. Sec 4.0 of the NRCC to allow a multi-story arrangement of a multi-family residential use. The applicant requests amendments to the following approved Special Permits of the NRCC: A Special Permit per Sec. 8.4.12 Retail Use of the NRCC to allow ground level retail use to be amended from the original decision to exceed the 3,000 gross square feet for one retailer. A Special Permit per Sec. 6.0 to be amended from the original decision to allow an eating and drinking place on the premises to reflect the new plan for the property located at 401 BRIDGE STREET (Map 25, Lot 74) and 44 Boston Street(Map 15, Lot 305). The applicant proposes to construct two separate buildings including the Community Life Center, a two-story building, and a five-story mixed-use Qsidential/retail on the corner of Boston and Bridge Street with an associated revised parking and landscape yout. The public hearing will be held on Thursday,July 30,2015 at 7:00 PM, in Room 313, Third Floor at 120 Washington Street in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Department of Planning&Community Development, Third Floor, 120 Washington Street, Salem, MA. Ben Anderson, Chair Planning Board This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Roard" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on '',,IIII g 9 r at /(1„31o�t in accordance''J6tth &?R.1hap. 30A, Sections 18-25. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 . PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978,740,0404 ' www.SALEm.COM o- CITY OF SALEM 0 ,,, PLANNING BOARD 1015 JUL -q p 2: 09 CITY CLERK�S #FM MAKS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,July 16, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. Ben Anderson, Chair Salem Planning Board • This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass, on J� � 'n11rr at % in accordance vj AL Nap. 30A, Sections 18-25. • =� CITY OF SALEM • PLANNING BOARD FILE N FORM A-DECISION CITY SLEEK, SALEM, MASS. 20 WEBB,4 SZETELA LANE,3 FORT AVENUE, 1 FORT AVENUE, 1 REAR FORT AVENUE On July 30,2015 by a unanimous vote of eight (8)in favor (Ben Anderson (Chair),Kirt Reider,Dale Yale, Bill Griset,Matt Veno, Noah Koretz,Randy Clarke, Carole Hamilton) and none (0) opposed to endorse "Approval under Subdivision Control Law Not Required" for the property located at 20 Webb, 4 Szetela Lane, 3 Fort Avenue, 1 Fort Avenue, 1 Rear Fort Avenue and filed on the following described plan: "Plan of Land in Salem,MA Prepared for City of Salem" dated July 14, 2015. 1. Applicant: City of Salem,MA 01970 I 2. Location: 20 WEBB, 4 SZETELA LANE, 3 FORT AVENUE, 1 FORT AVENUE, 1 REAR FORT AVENUE (Map 41,Lots 245, 244,235, 236,243) 3. Description: The petitioner proposes to combine five (5) lots to create one (1) lot. • Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. Sincerely, Ben Anderson Chair Cc.: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk • m CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 7015 aur. _il moi: 5�0 FILE # FORM A- DECISION CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS- 46-48 SCHOOL STREET On July 30,2015 by a unanimous vote of eight (8) in favor (Ben Anderson (Chair), Kirt Reider, Dale Yale, Bill Griset,Matt Veno, Noah Koretz, Randy Clarke, Carole Hamilton) and none (0) opposed to endorse "Approval under Subdivision Control Law Not Required" for the property located at 36 Felt Street and filed on the following described plan: "Plan of Land 18&36 Felt Street Salem,MA Property of James Treadwell and Michael&Linda Blier"" dated December 14, 2012. 1. Applicant: Estate of James Treadwell, 36 Felt Street, Salem, Ma 01970 2. Location: 36 Felt Street Salem,MA 01970 (Map 27 Lot 608) 3. Description: The applicant proposes to convey area from one lot and add that area to another lot. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. • Sincerely, Ben Anderson on Chair Cc.: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD FILE # FORM A- DECISION CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS 46-48 SCHOOL STREET On July 30,2015 by a unanimous vote of eight (8) in favor (Ben Anderson (Chair),Kitt Reider, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matt Veno, Noah Koretz, Randy Clarke, Carole Hamilton) and none (0) opposed to endorse "Approval under Subdivision Control Law Not Required" for the property located at 46 and 48 School Street and filed on the following described plan: "A.N.R. Plan for Michael W. Becker at 46-48 School Street Salem, MA" dated July 29, 2015 1. Applicant: Michael Becker 48 School Street Salem,MA 01970 2. Location: 46 and 48 School Street Salem,MA 01970 (Map 27,Lot 7)(Map 27,Lot 5) 3. Description: The applicant requests to create one buildable lot. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. • Sincerely, IJP Ben Anderson Chair Cc.: Cheryl LaPointe,City Clerk • 4 a CITY OF SALEM s , PLANNING BOARD • 1015 JUN 18 A 4 00 NOTICE OF MEETING FILE 11 CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, June 18,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Charles M. Puleo, Chair REVISED MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • June 4,2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 92-94 Lafayette Street (Map 34 Lot 414) Applicant: RCG KLONDIKE CLUB LLC,RCG LLC Description: Continuation of Board deliberation for a Site Plan Review, to convert the • second floor and mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight (8) residential dwelling units. The public hearing portion of this discussion was closed at the last regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on June 4, 2015. The board will discuss and vote on an application for a Site Plan Review. Location: 43 Bridge Street (Map 36 Lot 238) Applicant: SKOMURSKI DEVELOPMENT LLC Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control (ANR). The proposal is to divide the property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. W. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Osborne Hills Realty Trust-request for Lot Releases for Phase III and Surety Bond Approval Election for Planning Boaid Officers 107 Highland- Project update This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on JUN 18 2015 V. ADJOURNMENT at ;n accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. is Knawyour ngbtr under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A 5 18-25 and City Or&nance 5 2-2028 through J 2-2033. 4. CITY OF SALEM a own PLANNING BOARD 2015 JUN I I P 2: 12 FILE ## NOTICE OF MEETING CITY GLER9, SALEM. MASS. You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, June 18,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Charles M. Puleo, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • June 4,2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 92-94 Lafayette Street(Map 34 Lot 414) • Applicant: RCG KLONDIKE CLUB LLC,RCG LLC Description: Continuation of Board discussion for a Site Plan Review, to convert the second floor and mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight (8) residential dwelling units. The public hearing portion of this discussion was closed at the last regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting on June 4,2015. The board will discuss and vote on an application for a Site Plan Review. Location: 43 Bridge Street (Map 36 Lot 238) Applicant: SKOMURSKI DEVELOPMENT LLC Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control (ANR). The proposal is to divide the property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. W. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Election for Planning Board Officers ` 107 Highland-Project update This notice posted on "O�c181 BUlletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. onJUN I ION 28 Goodhue- Project Update at Z'1Z'Ph in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. 0 V. ADJOURNMENT ` Knowyour righty under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A 518-25 and City Ordinance 5 2-2028 through J 2-2033. ,�rohmtTg9' v� pis' CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS n� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ,a per; A��M1NE1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRiscoLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAx:978-740-0404 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICD DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner DATE: June 11,2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting—June 18,2015 Please find the following in the file: ➢ Agenda for June 4, 2015 ➢ Planner's Memo APPROVAL OF MINUTES • June 4, 2015 • REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 92-94 Lafayette (Map 34 Lot 414) Continuation of Board deliberation for an application for Site Plan Review, to convert the second story and mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight (8) residential dwelling units. The public hearing portion of this project was closed on June 4, 2015. Comments have been received from all Departments required for final action to be taken by the Planning Board. 2. 43 Bridge Street(Map 36 Lot 238) Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control (ANR). The proposal is to divide the property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. I. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 107 Highland Compliance- On April 22,2015 a letter was sent to the applicant with a request to bring deviations from plans into compliance. A request from the applicant to the Planning Board for insignificant and significant changes • is pending as of June 11, 2015. CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,June,4 at 7.•OOpm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem,MA Charles M Puleo, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL 91 --1 II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • May 21,2015 _ rn a III. REGULAR AGENDA mm 03 Location: 92-94 Lafayette Street(Map 34 Lot 414) rn Applicant: RCG KLONDIKE CLUB LLC, RCG LLC Description: A public hearing for an application for Site Plan Review,( cons�er an application to convert the second floor and its mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight (8)residential dwelling units. Location: 43 Bridge Street (Map 36 Lot 238) Applicant: SKOMURSKI DEVELOPMENT LLC Description: A public hearing for an application for a Waiver of Frontage Request and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the applicant proposes to divide the property into five (5)lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 107 Highland Avenue This nonce posy, f on "Official Bulletin Board" 28 Goodhue City Haig, Salen tw1ass, on � at •6) iii accordant ha MGL Chap.��$OA; V. ADJOURNMENT Sections 18-25. Knomyour rights under the Open Meeting I aw M.G.L c: 3O§ 18-25 and City 0rdsnanee 12-2028 through If 2-2033. • CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ,� 4f DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 LYNN GOOMN DUNCAN,AICP DIRECFOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner DATE: May 28,2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting—June 4,2015 Please find the following in the file: Agenda for June 4,2015 Planner's Memo APPROVAL OF MINUTES • May 21,2015 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 92-94 Lafayette (Map 34 Lot 414) Continuation of a public hearing for an application for Site Plan Review,to convert the second story and mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight(8) residential dwelling units. This project has been sent to other City departments for review. 2. 43 Bridge Street (Map 36 Lot 238) A public hearing for an application for a Waiver of Frontage and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the applicant proposes to divide the property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. The applicant is also requesting an Approval Not Required(ANR).A copy of the plan is included in this packet. On February 18, 2015, the petitioner received Variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals for relief from Sec. 4.1.1 Table of Dimensional Requirements from minimum lot area, minimum lot frontage,maximum lot coverage,minimum side setbacks,minimum rear setbacks and maximum number of stories to allow the division of property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single family homes and one (1) three-story duplex. A copy of the stamped Zoning Board of Appeals Decision is included in this packet for reference. • City of Salem: Planning Board • Staff Memorandum—June 4,2015 Page 2 of 2 I. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 107 Highland Compliance- On April 22,2015 a letter was sent to the applicant with a request to bring deviations from plans into compliance.A request from the applicant to the Planning Board for insignificant and significant changes is pending as of May 28,2015. 28 Goodhue Compliance- On April 22,2015 a letter was sent to the applicant with a request to remove the gate and all related hardware and posts that have been installed at the entrance to the multi-use path.The gate has been removed,however the hardware and posts still remain. It is expected that the black posts and hardware will be removed by June 4. it • • City of Salem — Meeting Sign-In Sheet Ilk la~cl Board: Date Name Mailing Address Phone # E-mail i Page of I THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS) I M /A-�C(-,,� FL DATA a f PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 4; .PUQLICH64 / ALEM Wf/1 .PCmE, H NOT/CE Will hold a publichearing for all Parsons/ a�PubtoaOgRD `�` -ons SKOMURggd In me DEVELOPMENT f arrtl FlKa R �D P oilin. rig if .and Flood HazarrdLLC fbra waiver of FOve�rlay District •� Sem/ accordance with pe Ha�rdFrontaga MENT �Special'8.t Fomff od Hazard Overlay RD DJatrfB ^c8.1 F n acc sly bier. PDi&lct of the Salem Zoning.Ordl- g Snan ca for `/la Sal_Hazeror>ce With I.nance,for the Property located at43. COTS MAY 2I A II= 33 RIDGE S e prop r^Zo^fn�erlay "BRIDGE STREET(Map 38 Lot 238)... t 'dac call Ha ST(M led Ordr. Specifically the applicant proposes di,. Y the QP36L Lo at 43 to divide the property into W 5) FILE lots for the e.Pr Pe/`cs^t prof 238), lots for the construct 3n of tour (5) e/e• cx. f ctionnY Into ve (SpOge)s single-famiy homes and one (1), CITY CLEM. SALEM, MASS. r uThemryti;,,,t ft erp joe r'(4) tluThe public hearing will be held do Thu P`blrn hear- (1) on Thug,Jun 4,2015 at 7:00 PM,at 3130,Weshln8 on 201/5��.-00 ill be.h�/ 3 120 n$al rdance wMhooCr,room Hearin Notice 40A'ct thec'cortl3rU fo�PA4ata 40A of the Massachusetts Ge�netrdl. B 'A copMaegachu D oomry Laws.A copy of the applicatifileon and Ole an aaPPB sUencary al Newsdurinare g nor busivellness hours, ty Of Salem liGthe Dap9 nonryl bu ailahIs for and yrat the Dept.of.Planning&Commu-.. tY Dave% of Pfennl s/ness re'.. (nly Development, 3rd Floor, 120 rshf^gton pn�errt, 3?9�Cpm urs waahington St-,Salem pfq. nning Board h''Salem dor'mu- , - Oharles M Puled,Chair 5/]?1,512811 /�Plgr ,Cha20 SN_5/21,5/28/15 Planning g Boardmerested in the application of SKOMURSKI a pubs � pp D 1-... OPRequest and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit ' „� 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, for the property-ro(-A W at 43 BRIDGE STREET(Map 36 Lot 238). Specifically, the applicant proposes to divide the property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. The public hearing will be held on Thurs, June 4, 2015 at 7:00 PM, at 120 Washington St., 3rd floor, room 313, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Massachusetts General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Dept. of Planning & Community Development, 3`d Floor, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Planning Board Salem News: 5/21/2015 & 5/28/2015 This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on MAY 2 1 2015 at I/'33 in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404- WWW.SALEM.COM .., City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 1 of 7 • City of Salem Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes Thursday,June 4,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday,June 4, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313,Third Floor, at 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Puleo opened the meeting at 7:18pm. Roll Call Those present were: Chuck Puleo, Chair, Helen Sides, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno and Noah Koretz.Absent: Ben Anderson. Also present: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes May 21, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by the Planning Board members. • Motion and Vote:Helen Sides made a motion to approve the May 21,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor and none (0)opposed Regular Agenda Location: 92-94 Lafayette Street(map 34 Lot 414) Applicant: RCG KLONDIKE CLUB LLC, RCG LLC Description: A continuation of the public hearing for Site Plan Review,to consider an application to convert the second floor and its mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight (8) residential dwelling units. Documents and Exhibitions: • Revised drawings RCG Apartments, Floorplans prepared by Pitman &Wardley, 32 Church Street, Salem, dated March 18, 2015. • Existing Basement & First Floor Floorplans Al • Proposed Basement& First Floor Floorplans A1A • Existing Second &Third Floor& Roof Floorplans A2 Proposed Second &Third Floor& Roof Floorplans A2A Existing Front,Sides& Rear Elevation Drawings A3 Proposed Front,Sides& Rear Elevation Drawings A3A Peter Pitman, architect, Pitman &Wardley,32 Church Street,Salem, presented for the applicant. Other • presenters included: • David Steinbergh; Principal, RCG LLC, 17 Ivaloo Street,Somerville City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 2 of 7 • Mr. Pitman presented revised drawing boards and illustrated the answers to questions raised by the Planning Board during the last hearing: • Parking space dimensions added to the drawings • Dumpster enclosure added • Alleyway dimensions added • 3 spaces on the lot are accessed via Dodge Street Court to the back of the building. • Stairway added to the back of the building,the ground floor exit door opens into the parking area. • The existing first floor delivery door for the restaurant space will be kept; it exits onto the parking area at the rear of the building. • There is no exit to the alley on the north (right)side of the building. • Two stairways and an elevator provide access to the building. The presentation continued with a discussion of the rooftop treatment and its relationship to adjacent buildings. Mr. Pitman advised: • Current roof-situated equipment that will remain includes: HVAC, satellite dish and commercial vent for the restaurant.The restaurant fan equipment goes down the south (left from Lafayette Street perspective) side of the building and will also remain.Anything else on the roof that can be removed will be. • Adding individual HVAC units for the 8 residences;to be located on the north side of the building as far from 90 Lafayette as possible, and as far from the front of the building as possible to • eliminate visibility from the street.Will add a sound screen around the equipment if testing indicates necessary. Mr. Pitman advised the building code is very specific with regard to allowed decibels; the project will comply with code. Mr. Pitman continued the review of the revised elevation drawings with the following highlights: • Stair tower will be finished in a terra cotta stucco close to the color of the existing brick; cannot match the brick. Plans will include windows in the stair tower. • Existing exterior lights mounted on the rear of the building are mounted low on the wall and will provide adequate lighting for the parking area.The target is one(1)foot candle or less at the edge of the property. • Window locations will stay the same, replaced in kind with thermal, Harvey-type chosen for ease of operation, maintenance and security which are the concerns. Existing windows are double- hung; the developer intends to maintain the style and will match in kind, including divided lights and clad trim. Window trim color not yet determined; possibly bronze—definitely not white or silver. Front windows will be repaired and maintained if possible, or designed in kind to match the unique windows that exist. BOARD DISCUSSION, Parking Concerns The Board expressed concern there is not enough space for the 3rd onsite parking space adjacent the dumpster and truck access to service the dumpster. Mr. Pitman advised the truck will not be using a claw lift, and will back into the area from Dodge Street Court. Staff planner Erin Schaeffer stated that the B5 Zoning District. Specifically, Section 5.1.9 Central • Development (B5) District allows: "Parking for rehabilitated buildings to be accommodated by either City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 3 of 7 • one (1) or a combination of on-site parking and/or parking at municipal or other parking facilities in the vicinity of the proposed use (Sec. 2 b) All municipal or other parking facilities which are used to satisfy the parking requirement must meet the following criteria:The parking facility must be less than one thousand (1,000)feet from the proposed development..." This information was provided to discuss other possible options regarding off-site parking.This project is currently providing three (3)onsite parking spaces and five (5)offsite spaces via lease. The Board asked to know how compliance with the one (1) space per unit is verified over time,from the time of occupancy forward. In particular the Board is concerned that in the event the five (5) off-site spaces are sold or otherwise no longer leased to this project,the developer is required to replace those five (5) spaces for the residents of this project. After extended discussion,the Board and proponent agreed to ensure parking space continuity by: • Requiring the proponent to include a copy of the lease assigning to this project the five (5) offsite spaces currently planned. • In the event of a change in location of the five (5) offsite spaces,the developer is required to notify the City Planner and receive approval for the newly selected location—which must be in compliance with the code which essentially requires the spaces to be located within 1,000 feet of the building.Appropriate documentation (new lease, deed,etc.) must accompany the notification of change in offsite parking provided for this project. Mr.Steinbergh responded to a Board inquiry about snow storage and advised the had to remove snow during this past winter and expect to regularly need to do so to provide parking, as there is no snow • storage onsite. Chair Puleo opened the issue to the public for comment. No public comments were made or questions asked. Board Discussion: Chair Puleo advised not all City Department reviews of the application are complete;the City Engineering Department review is pending. A vote on the decision cannot be held at this time, but in the interest of efficiency,the Board can close the public hearing and review the draft decision. Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to close the public hearing,seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz) and none(0)opposed. The Board reviewed the draft decision in detail,with special attention to paragraphs deviating from standard language.The Board stipulated the decision include the details with regard to the five (5) offsite parking spaces: • The proponent to provide a copy of the lease assigning to this project the five (5)offsite spaces currently planned. • In the event of a change in location of the five (5)offsite spaces, the developer is required to notify the City Planner and receive approval for the newly selected location—which must be in compliance with the code which essentially requires the spaces to be located within 1,000 feet of the building.Appropriate documentation (new lease, deed,etc.) must accompany the • notification of change in offsite parking provided for this project. City of Salem—Planning Board f DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 4 of 7 • • Radon mitigation system to be installed may need to be clarified;testing should happen first. (Health inspector). • Recycling is required, and composting is encouraged. • Engineering Department comments are pending. Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to table a vote on the decision until the next meeting on June I8,2015,seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. Location: 43 Bridge Street(Map 36 Lot 238) Applicant: SKOMURSKI DEVELOPMENT LLC Description: A public hearing for an application for a Waiver of Frontage Request and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Specifically,the applicant proposes to divide the property into five (5) lots for the construction of four(4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. Documents and Exhibitions: • Plan of Land 43 Bridge Street& 13 Planters Street dated April 14, 2015, prepared by LeBlanc Survey Associates, Inc., 161 Holten Street, Danvers . • City of Salem Board of Appeal April 1, 2015 Decision,stamped • Special Permit Plan at Lot 1 Planters Street(Flood hazard Overlay District Plan), dated May 12, 2015 and labeled TCL#1645, prepared by Thomas Mannetta Incorporated, 445 Rantoul Street, Beverly • Application Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, stamped May 14, 2015 • Application for Endorsement of Plan Believed Not to Require Approval, stamped May 14, 2015 Atty Stephen Lovely; Lovely Law Group LLP, 10 Federal Street,Salem, presented for the applicant.Other proponent speakers included: • Joseph A. Skomurski, Sr.; Principal, Skomurski Development, LLC, 107 Bradstreet Avenue, Danvers. Atty Lovely opened the presentation and reminded the Board of the zoning change to facilitate this project; discussed at the joint meeting with City Council on October 20, 2014.Since then the project has been revised from six(6)to five (5) lots,with the corner lot at Bridge and Planter Streets to be occupied by a duplex building (larger than the other planned buildings)grander in style with front doors on Bridge Street.The intent is to recognize and continue the unique architecture that can be found on Bridge Street and contribute to the general improvement of this entrance corridor. He also advised the Historic Commission has approved a waiver for demolition delay(buildings over fifty years old) and a decision has been issued by the Board of Appeals, so the project is moving forward. 0 City of Salem— Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 5 of 7 • Board Discussion: Chair Puleo advised the corner lot may fall in the entrance corridor overlay zoning requirements.The Board is very interested in getting more details on this building due to its highly visible location on an entrance corridor. The Board recognized the project is not required to seek approval for its architectural plans from the Design Review Board. Given this lack of additional review,the Board offered the following recommendations which were welcomed by the developer: • Regardless of design treatments, it will be obvious the lots were developed in the same time frame.To optimize curb appeal and provide neighborhood cohesiveness,there should be repetitive elements across these five houses and the corner duplex building should tie in with the houses. • Scale and proportion, particularly with regard to windows is a critical design element that can enable these new constructions to harmonize with the neighborhood.Windows with divided lights, 6 over 6 (vs.4 over 4) are desirable. • A variety of exterior/trim colors, door placements and other minor variations are successfully used to create unique houses while uniting them with larger design elements such as roof pitch/style,soffits, exterior materials and trim styles. Mr. Skomurski stated he is very sensitive to the improvements on Bridge Street and welcomes the suggestions of the Planning Board.Atty Lovely added the developer has been very active in engaging the • neighbors, seeking their support and keeping them advised of their plans.Atty Lovely and Mr. Skomurski offered the following details; • For economic reasons,vinyl siding is planned for the exteriors;the houses will not all be the same color. • The duplex at the corner of Bridge & Planters is to be clad in Hardy plank lapboard (a cementitious material), with trim detail to complement the current architecture found on Bridge Street. The Board indicated the duplex building is a key part of the Bridge Street Entrance Corridor Overlay District and will condition any favorable decision subject to Planning Board approval of architectural plans for this building. Flood Hazard Overlay Staff Planner Erin Schaeffer read into the record the criteria for the flood hazard overlay special permit: • The proposed use will comply in all respects to the uses and provisions of the underlying district in which the land is located. • There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s)or adjacent lot(s)caused by either overspill from water bodies or high runoff. • Utilities, including gas, electricity,fuel,water and sewage disposal,shall be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking, leaking, short-circuiting,ground or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. • City of Salem — Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 6 of 7 The Board agreed this project meets all criteria. It was noted the flood hazard overlay only affects lot 1 • which abuts 15 Planters Street. Additional Discussion • The Board asked if street trees are planned. Atty Lovely advised the developer is waiting to hear whether sidewalks will be installed;the developer is certainly willing to add trees as appropriate. • Atty Lovely advised the city engineer is reviewing the feasibility of adding a sidewalk as it would need to be created by taking area out of the existing street.The proponent would like to see a sidewalk added and is willing to work with the city to facilitate.The Board noted any curbing installed should be concrete not asphalt. • Mr. Skomurski advised there might be room for a three-foot sidewalk.The gutter line is also the property line, marked on the drawing by a dotted line.The street was not originally laid out with sidewalk and planting strip.The City Engineer is reviewing the matter and will make a determination. Chair Puleo opened the issue to the public for comment. There being no audience other than the proponent, no further comments were made. Motion and Vote: Matt Veno made a motion to close public hearing seconded by Noah Kortez. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to grant the request for a waiver of frontage for the lots on • Planters Street, seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to grant the request for a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. Staff Planner Erin Schaeffer advised the Board that a mylar plan is needed to enable a vote on the ANR request. Chair Puleo rescheduled this matter for the Planning Board Meeting on June 18, 2015. Old/New Business • 107 Highland Avenue Staff Planner Erin Schaeffer reported a letter dated April 22, 2015, was sent to the applicant with a request to bring deviations from plans into compliance; specifics were listed and photos attached. A request from the applicant to the Planning Board for insignificant and significant changes is pending as of May 28, 2015. Staff planner Erin Schaeffer stated the proponent's attorney Scott Grover has been in communication with the city planning department; among other details relayed, the pigeon shelves are coming down. Ms. Schaeffer plans another site visit to review compliance with all details of the decision.The building inspector has been asked to review the lights as there is spillover onto adjacent properties.The rear entrance pediment roof is a significant change. 41 Ct City of Salem—Planning Board DRAFT Meeting Minutes—June 4, 2015 Page 7 of 7 • The developer has sold four units and requested certificates of occupancy for those four units. Formal request not yet received. Planning Department cannot approve Certificate of Occupancy due to lack of compliance. • 28 Goodhue Staff planner Erin Schaeffer reported a letter dated April 22, 2015,was sent to the applicant with a request to remove the gate and all related hardware and posts that were installed at the entrance to the multi-use path.The gate has been removed; however the hardware and posts remain. It is expected the black posts and hardware will be removed by June 4. Since then,the Operations Manager of the site responded to the request to remove the posts with a request for waiver as such removal will likely damage the paving.The developer's attorney,Joseph Correnti advised the developer will likely cut the poles and patch the asphalt. He also noted the installed pine trees are all dead and will be replaced with blue spruce. The Planning Board asked that the removal of the poles occur and that the removal of the posts poses no particular hardship as the poles can simply be cut and holes filled. Adjournment Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to adjourn the meeting seconded by Bill Griset The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo Ms. Sides Ms Yale Mr. Clarke Mr. Rieder Mr. Griset and Mr. Veno)and none(0)opposed. Chairman Puleo adjourned the meeting at 9:00pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk App Dyed by the Planning Board on XX/XX/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. e. 30A§18-25 and City Ordinance§2-2028 through¢2-2033. CITY OF SALEM P � CANNING BOARD 101) jun 214 P 128 is Site Plan Review Decision FILE # 92-94 Lafayette Street. CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASS. June 24, 2015 RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street, Suite 100 Somerville, MA 02143 RE: 92-94 Lafayette Street Site Plan Review On Thursday,May 21, 2015, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing under Section 9.5- Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, at the request of RCG,LLC, for the property located at 92-94 Lafayette Street. The proposed site plan shows a renovation of the interior second floor and mezzanine of the existing commercial building into eight (8) residential dwelling units. On May 21, 2015 the public hearing was continued to June 4,2015. On June 4,2015 the public hearing was continued to June 18, 2014 and closed on this date. • At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on June 4,2015,the Planning Board voted by a vote of six eligible members (6) in favor (Chuck Puleo (Chair), Helen Sides,Kirt Reider, Dale Yale, Bill Griset,and Noah Koretz), and none (0) opposed to approve the Site Plan Review Special Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform to the plans entitled, "RCG Apartments 92-94 Lafayette Street"prepared by Pitman &Wardley Architects LLC,32 Church Street, Salem, MA 01970, dated March 18,2015. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board for review and approval. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 3. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance, Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. • 2 • b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of demolition and construction of the project. c. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling, blasting or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays,or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All construction vehicles left overnight at the site,must be located completely on the site g. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant to the Building Inspector for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Included in this plan,but not limited to, shall be information regarding how the construction equipment will be stored,a description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the • construction employees will park their vehicles. 4. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City,at the expense of the applicant,his successors or assigns,as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to controlled construction,which requires oversight by licensed engineers and architects.Accordingly,it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site improvements related to the project located within the public way,including all utility connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the expense associated with a Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of hours and at a customary rate for such service. 5. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 6. Building Inspector All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector consistent with the current version of the State Building Code,Massachusetts Architectural Access Board regulations and Massachusetts Energy Codes. 3 • 7. Board of Health a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name, address,and telephone number of the project (site) manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. b. A lead and asbestos inspection to be conducted prior to any demolition or construction. If lead or asbestos is found it shall be removed by contractors licensed for such removal. c. The developer shall ensure that pests do not negatively impact the neighborhood as a consequence of construction work. The developer shall submit pest control reports including a pest survey and treatment actions. d. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the extenninatoi s invoice to the Health Agent e. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. f The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control during construction, such as negative air pressure and physical barriers between occupied areas and construction areas. • g. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting. h. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. i. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health. j. Any water sub-metering shall comply with the requirements of Chapter II of the State Sanitary Code. k. The developer shall test for Radon and install Radon mitigation system prior to the issuance of an Occupancy Permit. 1. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. 8. Utilities a. Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a • Building Permit.The applicant shall have a licensed Engineer certify the utility plan for review by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 4 • b. All on site electrical utilities shall be located underground. 9. Conservation Commission The project is determined to be outside of the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission. 10. Signage Proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 11. Lighting No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. 12. Noise HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further mitigate noise emanating from the HVAC unit(s) if the Board of Health receives any complaints. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the guideline for reviewing such noise is that the broadband sound level should not increase by more than 10 dB (A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line.The method for screening the units shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to installation. 13. Parking • a. Three (3) on-site parking spaces and five (5) off-site spaces located at other parking facilities in the vicinity of the proposed use,in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Section 5.1.9 Parking for Central Development District (B5), are to be reserved for the sole use residents who live in 92-94 Lafayette Street. b. A lease agreement between RCG and neighboring entities for the five (5) off-site spaces as proposed on the approved plans shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. c. On-site and off-site spaces shall be marked or signed as reserved for residents of 92-94 Lafayette Street. Documentation of this shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. d. The applicant, its successors or assigns, shall maintain parking spaces and be made available for year- round use for the residents of 92-94 Lafayette Street. e. The location of off-site parking spaces may be changed in accordance with the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance Section 5.1.9 Central Development District (B5) at the discretion of the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5 • 14. Maintenance a. Refuse removal,ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. "Refuse removal"includes recycling,which shall be the responsibility of the owner, their successors or assigns. The owner shall provide adequate facilities to ensure all users are able to recycle their trash. Owner is to enter into a contract with a company of the owner's choice to arrange pick-up of recyclable material.A copy of this contract is to be submitted to the City Engineer. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site by the applicant, his successors or assigns. c. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. d. The applicant, his successors or assigns shall use its best efforts to engage a waste hauler for compost that will regularly accept organic wastes from on-site residents for off-site composting. Organic wastes shall not be stored on-site in a manner that allows nuisance conditions to develop. 15. As-built Pians As-built Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of the • Certificate of Occupancy. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy;as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. To the extent that construction work has been completed sufficient for a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety but that the As-Built plans have not yet been fully completed (for said portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety), the applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an amount and form subject to approval of the City Planner to ensure that the As-Built Plans are completed within a reasonable timeframe. 16. Violations Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board,unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I herebycertify that a co of this decision and plans has been filed with the Ci Clerk and '�Y PY P City copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the •certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied,is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds 6 • and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. [�GLB✓vC-fie �.,r�e�� Charles M. Puleo —T Chairman The endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decisions bearing certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that if such appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The owner or applicant shall pay the fee far recording or registering. • 4 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD IU15 JUN 4 P 2., 46 FILE # FORM A- DECISION CITY 6LERR, SALEM.MASS, 43 BRIDGE STREET On June 18, 2015 by a unanimous vote of eight (8) in favor (Chuck Puleo (Chair),Ben Anderson, helen Sides, Kirt Reider, Dale Yale,Bill Griset, Matt Veno,and Noah Koretz) and none (0) opposed to endorse "Approval under Subdivision Control Law Not Required" for the property located at 43 Bridge Street and filed on the following described plan: "Plan of Land 43 Bridge Street& 13 Planters Street Salem, Massachusetts" dated April 9, 2015. 1. Applicant: Skomurski Development LLC 107 Bradstreet Avenue,Danvers,MA 01923 2. Location: Map 36, Lot 236 43 Bridge Street Salem,MA 01970 3. Description: The applicant requests to create five (5) buildable lots. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. • Sincerely, Charles Puleo Chair Cc.: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk i a CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 JUN 24 A11: 48 Decision FILE r' Waiver From Frontage and Flood Hazard Overlay Dist1ictf9f8'cIdJPj�WftLr.M, M4SS. 43 Bridge Street (Map 36 Lot 414) June 24, 2015 Skomurski Development LLC c/o Stephen Lovely, Esquire Lovely Law Group 10 Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Waiver From Frontage and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit Decision On Thursday,June 4, 2015, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a public hearing at the request of SKOMURSKI DEVELOPMENT LLC, for a Waiver of Frontage Request and Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit in accordance with Section 8.1 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, for the property located at 43 BRIDGE STREET (Map 36. The applicant proposes to divide the • property into five (5) lots for the construction of four (4) single-family homes and one (1) duplex. The public hearing was closed on June 4, 2015. Flood Hazard Overlay Special Permit Findings: The Planning Board hereby makes the following findings pertaining P to the Flood Hazard District Special Permit Application: 1. The proposed uses comply in all respect to the uses and provisions of the underlying zoning district. 2. A portion of the site is within the 100-year FEMA coastal floodplain. There are adequate convenience and safety of vehicular and pedestrian movement within the site and in relation to adjacent streets and property, particularly in the event of flooding of the lot(s) or adjacent lots(s)caused by either the overspill from water bodies or high runoff. In the case of a 100-year flood, so that the finished floor level is located above the 100-year FEMA coastal floodplain elevation. 3. All utilities including gas, electricity, fuel,water and sewage disposal will be located and constructed so as to protect against breaking,leaking, short-circuiting,grounding or igniting or any other damage due to flooding. • 2 4. The proposed development will not be located within a coastal high hazard area (Zone VE on the • FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps). At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on June 4, 2015 the Planning Board voted by eight(8) in favor (Chuck Puleo, Chair, Helen Sides, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Gtiset, Matthew Veno and Noah Koretz), and none (0) opposed to a Flood Hazard Overlay District Special Permit and Waiver From Frontage subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall conform to the plans entitled "Plan of Land 43 Bridge Street and 13 Planters Street Salem, Massachusetts" dated April 9, 2015 prepared by LeBlanc Survey Associates, Inc. 2. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board 3. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: • a. All provisions in the City of Salem's Code of Ordinance,Chapter 22, Noise Control, shall be strictly adhered to. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of demolition and construction of the project. c. Drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling, blasting or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules,regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site g. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant to the • Building Inspector for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Included in this 3 • plan, but not limited to, shall be information regarding how the construction equipment will be stored,a description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the construction employees will park their vehicles. 4. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the expense of the applicant, his successors or assigns, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge the Project shall be subject to controlled construction,which requires oversight by licensed engineers and architects. Accordingly,it is the understanding of the Board, the City Planner and the Applicant that the Clerk of the Works is expected to oversee and review all civil/site improvements related_to the project located within the public way,including all utility connections to publicly owned infrastructure. It is also mutually understood that the expense associated with a Clerk of the Works shall be for a reasonable number of hours and at a customary rate for such service. i 5. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 6. Building Inspector All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector consistent with the current version of the State Building Code, Massachusetts Architectural Access Board regulations and • Massachusetts Energy Codes. 7. Board of Health a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name, address,and telephone number of the project (site) manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. b. A lead and asbestos inspection to be conducted prior to any demolition or construction. If lead or asbestos is found it shall be removed by contractors licensed for such removal. c. The developer shall ensure that pests do not negatively impact the neighborhood as a consequence of construction work. The developer shall submit pest control reports including a pest survey and treatment actions. d. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminators invoice to the Health Agent. e. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. • 4 f. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control during construction, is such as negative air pressure and physical barriers between occupied areas and construction areas. g. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting. h. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations,including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. i. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health. j. The developer shall test for Radon and install Radon mitigation system prior to the issuance of an Occupancy Permit. k. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. 8. Utilities a. Utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any • Building Permit. The applicant shall have an engineer certify the utility plans for review by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. b. All electrical utilities for the site shall be underground. c. A plan for sidewalks shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 9. Conservation Commission All work shall comply with the requirements of the Conservation Commission. 10. Signage Proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 11. Lighting a. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. b. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. After installation, lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5 • 12. Noise HVAC units shall be sufficiently buffered and the applicant shall take steps to further mitigate noise emanating from the HVAC unit(s) if the Board of Health receives any complaints. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the guideline for reviewing such noise is that the broadband sound level should not increase by more than 10 dB (A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. The method for screening the units shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to installation. 13. Landscaping a. Maintenance of all landscaping on the public way shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs including street trees for a two- (2) year period. b. Trees shall be a minimum diameter of 3 '/z" dbh (diameter breast height). c. The developer, his successors or assigns shall be responsible for the shoveling and/or snowplowing of the sidewalk for all building frontage along Planters Street and Bridge Street. d. Final completed landscaping in the public way shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the construction is finished such that a Certificate of Occupancy could be issued for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety. The applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an • amount and form subject to approval of the City Planner to ensure that the work is completed within a reasonable timeframe. The applicant may submit to the City Planner for partial releases of said surety based on work completed. 14. As-Built Plans a. As-built plans, stamped b a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department Y InP of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. b. The As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy;as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. To the extent that construction work has been completed sufficient for a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued for a portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety but that the As-Built plans have not yet been fully completed (for said portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety), the applicant may provide a performance bond or surety in an amount and for subject to approval of the City Planner to • ensure that the As-Built Plans are completed within a reasonable timeframe. 6 • 15. Entrance Corridor Overlay District Special Condition The developer shall submit preliminary plans with detailed architectural information for the proposed duplex on Lot 5 to the Planning Board for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Lot 5 is within an Entrance Corridor Overlay Zoning District per Section 8.2 Entrance Corridor Overlay District (ECOD) of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. 14.Violations Violations of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board,unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied,is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Charles M. Puleo, Chair The endorsement shall not take effect until a copy of the decisions bearing certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20)days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that if such appeal has been filed that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record and noted on the owner's certificate of title. The owner or applicant shall pay the fee for recording or registering. • o- CITY OF SALEM 9l s z PLANNING BOARD 1015 MAY 13 P 1: 48 FILE it NOTICE OF MEETING CITY CL€M, SALE111, IIASS You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on. Thursday;May 21,2015 at 4:09p at City Hall Annex, Roont 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA Charles Al. Puleo, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . March 19, 2015 III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 92-94 Lafayette Street(Map 34 Lot 414) Applicant: RCG KLONDIKE CLUB LLC; RCG LLC Description: A public hearing For an application For Site Plan Review,to consider an application to • convert the secondfloor and its mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight{8,1 residential dwelling units. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS 1 i Brewer Hawthorne Cove Marina-Marina Dredge Project Notification C V. ADJOURNMENT i i t Kttaw,your rights under the Open tl9eeliq Law Af.G.L c. 30A 5 18-25 and Qly Ordinance 2-2028 th,uugh J 2-2033. t i } l 2 j g4 t This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on MAY 13 2015 at I.WrA in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, ; Sections 18-25. • F i �001DIT� � CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 5, 11 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KIMBERLEY DRIscoLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET ♦ SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 LYNN GOONIN DUNCAN,AICP TELE:978-619-5685 ♦ FAX:978-740-0404 DIRECTOR STAFF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner DATE: May 14, 2015 RE: Planning Board Meeting—May 21,2015 Please find the following in the file: D Agenda for May 21,2015 Planner's Memo APPROVAL OF MINUTES • March 19,2015 • REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. 92-94 Lafayette (Map 34 Lot 414) The applicant is proposing to convert the second story and its mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight(8)residential dwelling units. This project has been sent to other City departments for review. I. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Hawthorne Brewer Cove Marina-The Planning Board has received a Chapter 91 Notification from Bourne Consulting Engineering regarding a proposed project to dredge 29,900 cubic yards of material with offshore disposal.A Dredge Sampling Material Testing report is not included,but may be provided upon request. The project is currently under review by the City of Salem Conservation Commission under the Wetland Protection Act. The project has been submitted for MA MEPA review.The proposed dredging will take place during the allowed dredging window currently October 15 to February 15. No action from the Planning Board is needed. is � ov �- rn(aw-)e CA -e � City of Salem — Meeting Sign-In Sheet Board: Date �Name �.��""�� Mailing Address Phone # E-mail +�YSdS�^ GItl rlCCs ILC C( I+ Cn2C B'�IS S�RIN �C� Y[�IIGCsM> • r Page of THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS) IM ^ L DATA —P11BUC REAFING11crTV OF 0TicC PLANNING SALEM BOARP t,PUBLIC HE"Rat oil hold E'pebXe"hearIng for all f, P F Sq�M nCE persons interested in the applica X11 holtl Q BOARD tion of RCG KLONKDIKE CLUB LLC, 't Persons Int s Publk hearing Rroperrty LLC locratted at 92-94 1_11*0ettePlan Review for TY i °,P rtycrty fors Bp CG lq CL(%gPLCA �9 application proposes to convert, f Stiee}(IN located at gp, aw for the. the second floor and ss memnine the ePP1l ton bF414).SPeclHYetts . of existing commerdaI building,:i .,7 secontl Prop cally,;ZD eight(8)residential dwelling units."1 of existing r;�om°r'arltl 1fg m convert( 1 The Thurs;public y112201be 5 athearin 117:Wheld PM,oati ter The P)ublictlenda�tlal p�lldis��o( y 320 Was 13, in ei�oda St., III Pte r— iTM20u ISN ha 21 7g j City of Salem—Planning Board Approved Meeting Minutes—May 21, 2015 Page 1 of 4 City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday, May 21,2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313,Third Floor,at 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Puleo opened the meeting at 7:13 pm. Roll Call Those present were: Charles Puleo, Chair, Ben Anderson,Vice Chair, Helen Sides, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset and Noah Koretz.Absent: Matthew Veno Also present: Erin Schaeffer, Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes April 2,2015 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by the Planning Board members. • Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made o motion to approve the April 2, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes, seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor and none(0) opposed. Regular Agenda_ _ Location: 92-94 Lafayette Street(map 34 Lot 414) Applicant: RCG KLONDIKE CLUB LLC, RCG LLC Description: A public hearing for Site Plan Review,to consider an application to convert the second floor and its mezzanine of an existing commercial building into eight(8) residential dwelling units. Documents and Exhibitions: • Site Plan Review Application stamped received April 29, 2015 • Correspondence from RCG Klondike Club LLC grants permission to RCG LLC,dated April 28, 2015 • Environmental Impact Statement prepared by RCG, LLC dated April 28, 2015, with attached photograph of 92-96 Lafayette Street Parking Plan • RCG Apartments Zoning Package 92-96 Lafayette Street, Salem,dated March 18,2015 includes: o Site Plan of Land 92-96 Lafayette Street, prepared by North Shore Survey Corporation, 14 Brown Street, Salem, dated April 10, 2015 o RCG Apartments, Floorplans prepared by Pitman &Wardley, 32 Church Street,Salem, dated March 18, 2015 • Existing Basement& First Floor Floorplans Al • • Proposed Basement& First Floor Floorplans AlA • Existing Second &Third Floor& Roof Floorplans A2 City of Salem—Planning Board Approved Meeting Minutes—May 21, 2015 Page 2 of 4 • Proposed Second &Third Floor& Roof Floorplans A2A • Existing Front, Sides& Rear Elevation Drawings A3 • Proposed Front,Sides& Rear Elevation Drawings A3A Sarah Bilello, architect; Pitman &Wardley, 32 Church Street, Salem, presented for the applicant. Other speakers included: • David Steinbergh, Principal, RCG LLC, 17 Ivaloo Street,Suite 100, Somerville, MA • Jim Gagnon, Property Manager, RCG LLC, 17 Ivaloo Street, Suite 100,Somerville, MA Ms. Bilello advised the goals of this commercial property conversion are: • Preserve restaurant space and storage on the first floor and usable basement, • Add eight (8) residential units and 3 parking spaces with the balance of parking provided on adjacent property controlled by RCG. Using the proposed floorplans, she reviewed the key elements of the proposed changes to the structure and property. In response to clarification questions from Planning Board members, Ms. Bilello and Mr. Steinbergh also confirmed: • Rental units will include a loft feature which uses the mezzanine space. • Mr.Steinbergh confirmed the concept is for long-term rental property not conversion to condominiums. • Proposal includes a new staircase to the rear of the building that will be enclosed. • • There is an existing interior elevator; all units will have access to it. PARKING DISCUSSION. • Staff planner Ms. Schaeffer confirmed for the Board the parking requirement here is one (1) space per unit. • Mr. Clarke asked how the ownership and ongoing availability of the five (5) parking spaces not on the property will be associated to this property—by deed? Mr.Steinbergh advised the spaces will not be deeded to this development. In his opinion,the property is assured to have access to these spaces because they will be specified in the details of the Planning Board Decision which will be recorded. • The Board expressed concern it could be easy to accidentally assign these spaces to multiple projects, sell them separately as part of a different RCG parcel or otherwise lose their connection to this development.The Board wishes to assure that all eight(8) units will have parking provided on an ongoing basis. • The general consensus of the Planning Board was to require the proponent provide documentation formally assigning these parking spaces from one RCG entity to another for the express and dedicated use by these proposed residences. Such document should be added to the proponent's application and become a part of the decision. • The Board directed planning staff to seek advice from the City Solicitor with regard to ensuring all proposed parking remains associated with the development of this parcel. • Parking will be accessed via Dodge Street Court, no vehicular traffic expected on the alleys on either side of the building. ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION: • O City of Salem—Planning Board Approved Meeting Minutes—May 21, 2015 Page 3 of 4 • Staff planner Ms.Schaeffer confirmed this project is outside the review parameters of projects that must appear before the Design Review Board (DRB) and will not appear before the DRB. • HVAC units will be roof-mounted, a single unit per residence so the size of each unit will be relatively small and not be visible from the street. • It was noted the roof currently has HVAC/utilities associated with the first floor restaurant space. Board expressed a concern that the roof is overlooked by the building to the left(100 Lafayette Street)and screening (both visual and aural) might be required if that building includes residences. Planning staff was instructed to research the current usage of this building. • Dumpster requires enclosure; Mr. Steinbergh agreed it will be provided. Dumpster contractor may access from either Dodge Street Court or the alley alongside the building. • Mr. Steinbergh confirmed the alleyways are gated on the Lafayette Street end; there are no plans for the alleyways. • Any restaurant deliveries in the future would be provided via Dodge Street Court to the rear of the building. • Mr. Steinbergh confirmed the existing wood deck will be removed and the two trees will remain. As this parcel/building has never been used as a residence,the Planning Board considered it important to anticipate possible resident needs and requested the proponent include the following information at their next presentation: • Elevations showing building to the left (100 Lafayette Street) and its relationship to the project with particular attention to show the overlook of the project's roof from the adjacent building. • Elevations should also note the new material to be used on the stair tower. • Any plans to repoint the brick or repair/change trim work should be noted on the plans. • Define new windows including photos of the existing windows and a detailed specification of the proposed replacements. • Add dimensions of the alleyways and all parking spaces (demonstrate compliance with code). • Indicate any snow storage locations; if none indicated the application should show all snow will be removed. • Add existing lighting to the plan, particularly in the parking area as tenant safety is a concern. Motion and Vote: Kirt Rieder made a motion to continue the public hearing to June 4, 2015, seconded by Helen Sides. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset and Mr. Koretz)and none(0)opposed. Old/New Business___ • Brewer Hawthorne Cover Marina-Marina Dredge Project Notification The Planning Board received a Chapter 91 Notification from Bourne Consulting Engineering regarding a proposed project to dredge 29,900 cubic yards of material with offshore disposal. A Dredge Sampling Material Testing Report is not included but may be provided upon request.The project is currently under review by the City of Salem Conservation Commission under the Wetland Protection Act.The project has been submitted for MA MEPA review.The proposed dredging will take place during the allowed window, currently October 15 to February 15. • DISCUSSION No action is needed by the Planning Board City of Salem —Planning Board r Approved Meeting Minutes—May 21, 2015 Page 4 of 4 Adjournment Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to adjourn the meeting,seconded by Noah Koretz. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr.Anderson, Ms. Sides, Ms. Yale, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder,and Mr. Griset)and none (0)opposed. Chairman Puleo adjourned the meeting at 8:OOpm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk Approved by the Planning Board on 06/04/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A§ 18-25 and City Ordinance§2-2028 through§2-2033. • • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 APR 31 A 8. 23 FILE tt 01"Y CLERK, SALEM, MASS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,May 7,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street,has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board • This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" Ci�aall, Salem, Mass. on MAY 0 1 2015 at in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. • 000 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 APA -9 P 4: 1FIL5 CITY CLERK, SALEM, MASb, Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, April 16,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board This notice posted on "011'X` B Iletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on d�� 9 2015 at in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18.25. • *10 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 %hR 2b P h`l°► NOTICE OF MLSALEM.MASS C You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,April 2, 20-15 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, AM Charles M. Puleo, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • March 19,2014 Meeting Minutes III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 220 Highland Avenue (Map 8,Lot 0124) Applicant: • Tropical Products,Inc. Description: A continuation of the public hearing for an application for Site Plan Review, to consider an application to remove the existing silos and to extend the building along Highland Avenue,with a 574 square foot addition to the first floor, and a 3,485 square foot addition to the second floor. IV.OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 28 Goodhue Street update • Recycling&composting update • 107 Highland Avenue update V. ADJOURNMENT Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A§ 18-25 and City Or&nance 5 2-2028 througb J 2-2033. r This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on/ amA d 4, a.au— at 1 ,1 /yp,„ in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—April 2, 2015 Page 1 of 5 • City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday,April 2, 2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday,April 2, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313,Third Floor, at 120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Puleo opened the meeting at 7:10pm. Rolltall Those present were: Chuck Puleo, Chair, Ben Anderson,Vice Chair, Helen Sides, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno and Noah Koretz.Absent: Dale Yale. Also present: Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes f t sf 10773=77 � ,Sssi f March 19,2014 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by the Planning Board members. Motion and Vote:Kirt Rieder made a motion to approve the March 19 2014 Regular Meeting Minutes seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor and none(0) opposed • R?gu,arAgenda Location: 220 Highland Avenue(Map 8, Lot 0124) Applicant: Tropical Products, Inc. Description: A continuation of the public hearing for an application for Site Plan Review,to consider an application to remove the existing silos and to extend the building along Highland Avenue,with a 574 square foot addition to the first floor,and a 3,485 square foot addition to the second floor. Documents and Exhibitions: • Original Submitted Drawings: o Plan of Land Prepared for Berman Properties, LLC 1 220 Highland Avenue,Salem, MA, dated 2-17-2015 o Sheet A-1: South East Building Elevations, dated 2/24/2015 o Sheet A-2: North East Building Elevations, dated 2/24/2015 o Sheet A-3: Northwest Building Elevations, dated 2/24/2015 o Sheet A-4: South West Building Elevations, dated 2/24/2015 • Additional and Revised Drawings: o Sheet C-1: Site Plan by Graves Engineering Inc., dated 3/25/2015 o Sheet A-6: Modifications of Proposed New Work Plans, Elevations&Sections, dated 3/24/2015 o Sheet A-7: Existing/Proposed Building Use Plans& Parking Information,dated • 3/24/2015 City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—April 2, 2015 Page 2 of 5 • Atty George Atkins of Ronan, Segal & Harrington, 59 Federal Street, presented for the applicant.Other presenters included: • William Medinger, AIA, president& principal, MBA International Architects, 44 Washington Street, Melrose MA • Ed Berman, President,Tropical Products, 220 Highland Avenue,Salem, MA. • Renee Dionne,Vice President Finance &Operations,Tropical Products, 220 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA. Atty Atkins introduced the executive team and architect in attendance.The group has worked diligently to address all questions raised at the last meeting. He referenced the revised drawings to illustrate the key updates: Sheet C-1, Revisions: • Addition of wetlands and buffer zone to this plan to illustrate this project is far enough away to not require additional approvals or special accommodation. • Narrow curb cut, driveway and paving adjacent the silos subject to Mass DOT(Massachusetts Department of Transportation) approval. • "X" (2)on the Highland Avenue (SE corner)of the building indicates existing silos to be removed. • "X" (2) at the rear of the building and "X" (3) right rear of the building, current dead storage trailers which will be removed if the project goes forward. • Five (5) new parking spaces sized 9'X 22' • • Bicycle rack added to the rear, requesting some flexibility regarding number of racks and exact location based on employee preferences. • Right side overhead doors: o four(4) are not used 0 one (1) is used for tractor-trailers(closest to Highland Ave) o One (1) adjacent the tractor-trailer dock is used by small box trucks. As requested, the turn-around for tractor-trailers and turning radii are now noted on the plan.There is a conflict for the exit of a tractor-trailer so they removed the 5 additional parking spaces completely. Parking space requirements are still met. A-7 1s` Floor Plan: • Atty Atkins first called attention to a misprint on the plan, left side is existing building; the right side drawing is the proposed plan. • Atty Atkins reviewed the parking calculation as now detailed on the site plan;the project is in compliance with all zoning requirements for parking. A-6 Floor Plan 2nd floor addition: • Fork lift used to move goods from 1st to 2nd floor. • Narrowing of the southern driveway shown on this drawing subject to Mass DOT permitting. Additional Questions Addressed: • Board of Health wanted to know about any new trash requirements.Written summary of current trash handling was provided.A compactor is used with private contractor pickup. • Cardboard is saved and bailed, picked up by North Shore Arc who sells it to recycling. Drums are City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—April 2,2015 Page 3 of 5 • returned to vendor once emptied. New space will not generate different types of waste or handling requirements. • Proponent has agreed to the draft decision language including the conditions per City Engineer with regards to drainage plan; approval prior to building permit. • Lighting, no new lighting will be added to the front of the building. On the silos there are 14" square spotlights which will be removed.A small exit door will be added where silos were and will have an outside, downward-directed, hooded light at the entrance as required.Tear sheet example provided. • Existing landscaping will not be removed, no plans to install additional landscaping as the area is small. Proponent will continue to maintain the shoulder adjacent to Highland Avenue. The proponent researched the matter of adding a sidewalk and curbing along the Highland Avenue portion of their property: • This is a substantial cost and out of proportion to the cost and scope of the project.The City Building inspector was able to source estimates which range from $40,000-$50,000. • Mass DOT permitting would be required and Conservation Commission approval as the sidewalk/curb reaches the wetlands buffer zone at one end of the property. • This week the City learned that Route 107 improvements long- planned by Mass DOT are to be activated shortly. Highland Avenue abutters are required to keep the frontage area as open as possible so as not to obstruct the DOT improvements. Board Discussion: • Chair Puleo asked the proponent, if MassDOT requires repair of some curbing and sidewalk, are you willing to do the work?Atty Atkins advised yes. Chair Puelo advised he has met with the City Planner and they have learned from Mass DOT that Route 107 from Maple Street(Lynn) to Salem Hospital will be covered under the state's improvement plan. The Board collectively stated their appreciation of the completeness of the presentation, noting it to be a thorough response to their previous questions.They Board agree that in light of the Mass DOT project and the small scale of the project it is not reasonable to require curbing and sidewalks along Highland Avenue to be added to this project.The Board also noted this is a desirable project for Salem as it adds to our economic diversity with light manufacturing that does not add environmental risk. The Board recommended the bicycle rack capacity be added to the site plan drawings to avoid any future criticism. After brief discussion, the Board and proponent agreed a capacity of 3-5 bicycles was appropriate; more to be added based on employee interest. The Board confirmed no additional HVAC units will be added; no additional or changes to current signage. Motion and Vote: Ben Anderson made a motion to close the public hearing,seconded by Bill Griset. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr.Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz) and none(0)opposed. • Board Discussion: City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—April 2, 2015 Page 4 of 5 • The Board reviewed in detail the draft decision prepared by planning staff. Minor edits and changes were made. Motion and Vote: Helen Sides made a motion to approve the Site Review Plan application subject to all conditions as itemized in the attached decision,seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr.Anderson, Ms.Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. The decision is hereby incorporated and made a part of these minutes. Old/New Businessta.::r • 28 Goodhue update o Staff has inspected and observed the gate has been removed from the common path but post and hardware are still in place.The Board directed planning staff to send correspondence directing the removal of the post and hardware—all elements of the gate. • Recycling and composting update o Planning staff is still researching the matter. o Mr. Clarke suggested the staff draft correspondence from the Planning Board to City Council recommending they take any necessary action to require recycling be included at all larger residential developments.The Planning Board is looking for a way to support a requirement to include recycling as a requirement on appropriate site review • plans.The Planning Board would also like to strongly encourage or even require composting for larger residential developments, in support of the City's green policies. • 107 Highland Avenue update o Staff provided photographs of the project; on the south and north sides of the building the developer has enclosed what was previously open "pigeon shelves"trim under the eaves (they have been left open on the front of the building).This was not the agreement; this trim was to be preserved and painted. o Planning Board directed staff to send correspondence to the developer indicating the work must be brought into compliance with the approved plan as noted on the drawings during the recent staff inspection. Failure to comply will result in the Planning Board withdrawing approval of the site plan and notification to the Building Department not to issue an occupancy permit. o The Board agreed there are some modifications from the approved plan that could be considered for approval, but revised drawings should be formally submitted along with any such request. Significant elements not in compliance that must be fixed include: • Under the eave "pigeon shelves" all around the building • Panels under the windows(not siding as currently installed) • Pediment over the basement door should be removed. 'djournment ^ Ae Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to adjourn the meeting,seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo,Mr. Anderson, Ms. Sides, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Mr. Griset and Mr. Veno)and none(0)opposed. • Chairman Puleo adjourned the meeting at 8:10pm. Cit of Salem I City —Panning Board Meeting Minutes—April 2, 2015 Page 5 of 5 For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A §18-25 and City Ordinance§2-2028 through§2-2033. • • CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 MAR 12 P 5* 49 NOTICE OF MEETING FILL CITY CLEM, SALEM. MASS; You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,March 19,2015 at 7.00pm at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington St., Salem, AM Charles M. Puleo, Chair MEETING AGENDA I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • December 18 ,2014 Meeting Minutes III. REGULAR AGENDA Location: 220 Highland Avenue (Map 8,Lot 0124) Applicant: Tropical Products,Inc. Description: A public hearing for an application for Site Plan Review, to consider an application to remove the existing silos and to extend the building along Highland Avenue,with a 574 square foot addition to the first floor,and a 3,485 square foot addition to the second • floor. Location: 162 & 150 Federal Street(Map 26,Lots 2& 96) Applicant: Renewal Ventures,LLC,Assignee of rights granted to William Wharff Description: Board discussion and vote on the request for a six (6)month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25,2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight(8) residential units. Location: 405-427 Highland Avenue (Map 3,Lots 74, 75 & 76) Applicant: Paul Ferragamo Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control(ANR),proposing to subdivide the existing three lots at 405-427 Highland Avenue (Map 3,Lots 74, 75 &76)into five lots. IV. OLD/NEW BUSINESS • 28 Goodhue update V. ADJOURNMENT - YnowyourfiSbts under the Open Meeting La rITtS ROfitOrjfIEV'Vri r ,e,", tr2033. City Hall, Salem, Mass. on /a, o2Q/J at in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, • Sections 18-25. CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2815 APA l4 A cF 30 FILE # Site Plan Review Decision CITY GLMK, SALEM.MASS. 220 Highland Avenue(Map 8,Lot 124) April 14, 2015 Tropical Products, Inc. 220 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 RE: Application of Tropical Products, Inc. for a Site Plan Review for the property located at 220 Highland Avenue. On Thursday, March 19, 2015 the City of Salem Planning Board opened a Public Hearing under Section 9.5 Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance, at the request of Tropical Products, Inc., for the properties located at 220 Highland Avenue (Map 8, Lot 124). The proposed project includes the removal of the existing silos and extending the building along Highland Avenue, with a 574 square foot addition to the first floor, and a 3,485 square foot addition to the second floor. • The Public Hearing was continued to April 2, 2015. At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on April 2,2015 the Planning Board voted eight(8)in favor(Charles Puleo, Randy Clarke, Bill Griset,Matthew Veno,Noah Koretz, Ben Anderson, Helen Sides, and Kirt Rieder), and none (0) opposed,to approve the Site Plan Review application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Except as modified herein, Work shall conform to the Project Plans listed below entitled "Tropical Products Inc. 220 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Building Addition/Renovation February 24, 2015" Plans prepared by MBA International Architects, and Graves Engineering Inc. Project Plans: Sheet Title & Drawn By Dated NA Plan of Land Prepared for Berman Properties, LLC of 220 Highland 2/17/2015 Avenue, Salem, MA; drawn by B&R Survey, Inc. C-1 Site Plan; drawn by Graves Engineering Inc. 3/25/2015 A-1 South East Building Elevations; drawn by MBA International/Architects 2/24/2015 A-2 North East Building Elevations; drawn by MBA International/Architects 2/24/2015 A-3 North West Building Elevations; drawn by MBA 2/24/2015 Intemational/Architects A-4 South West Building Elevations; drawn by MBA 2/24/2015 • International/Architects 220 Highland Avenue April 14,2015 Page 2 of 6 • A-6 Modifications of Proposed New Work Plans, Elevations & Sections; 3/24/2015 drawn by MBA International/Architects A-7 Existing/Proposed Building Use Plans & Parking Information; drawn by 3/24/2015 MBA International/Architects 2. Transfer of Ownership Within five (5)days of transfer of ownership of the site, the Owner shall notify the Board in writing of the new owner's name and address. The terms, conditions, restrictions and/or requirements of this decision shall be binding on the Owner and its successors and/or assigns. 3. Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deemed necessary by the City Planner, shall require approval by the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditions contained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. 4. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. Exterior construction work shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:00 PM and 8:00 AM the following day on weekdays or at any time on Sundays or Holidays. Any interior work conducted during these times will not involve heavy machinery which could generate disturbing noises. • b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. c. Drilling, blasting, and rock hammering shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling, blasting,or rock hammering on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they leave the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. £ All construction vehicles left overnight at the site, must be located completely on the site. g. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, information regarding how the construction equipment will be stored, a description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the construction employees will park their vehicles. The plan and schedule shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. • 220 Highland Avenue April 14,2015 Page 3 of 6 • h. All sidewalks, roadways, utilities, landscaping, etc. damaged during construction shall be replaced or repaired to their pre-construction condition, or better. i. No Street shall be closed without prior approval of the City Planner, unless deemed an emergency by the Salem Police Department. 5. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 6. Building Inspector All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Building Inspector. 7. Board of Health a. The individual presenting the plan to the Board of Health must notify the Health Agent of the name, address, and telephone number of the project (site)manager who will be on site and directly responsible for the construction of the project. b. If a DEP tracking number is issued for this site under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, no structure shall be constructed until the Licensed Site Professional responsible for the site certifies that soil and ground water on the entire site meets the DEP standards for the proposed use. • c. The developer shall adhere to a drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer. d. The developer shall employ a licensed pesticide applicator to exterminate the area prior to construction, demolition, and/or blasting and shall send a copy of the exterminator's invoice to the Health Agent e. The developer shall maintain the area free from rodents throughout construction. f. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for dust control and street sweeping which will occur during construction. g. The developer shall submit to the Health Agent a written plan for containment and removal of debris, vegetative waste, and unacceptable excavation material generated during demolition and/or construction. h. The Fire Department must approve the plan regarding access for fire fighting. i. Noise levels from the resultant establishment(s) generated by operations, including but not limited to refrigeration and heating, shall not increase the broadband sound level by more than 10 dB(A) above the ambient levels measured at the property line. j. The developer shall disclose in writing to the Health Agent the origin of any fill material needed • for the project. 220 Highland Avenue April 14,2015 Page 4 of 6 • k. The resultant establishment(s) shall dispose of all waste materials resulting from its operations in an environmentally sound manner as described to the Board of Health. 1. The developer shall notify the Health Agent when the project is complete for final inspection and confirmation that above conditions have been met. in. The developer shall provide a plan showing how grease in gray water is contained, prior to it entering the city sewer system in developments with 10 or more units and in compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer n. Salem sits in a Radon Zone 1 and the risk of radon entering buildings is extremely high. Therefore, the installation of radon mitigation systems is strongly recommended. 8. Utilities i a. The applicant shall provide a drainage plan to the Department of Planning& Community Development showing how the roof runoff from the addition will be handled. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. b. Existing site utilities have not been shown, but any connections required due to the new building addition must be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. • 9. Department of Public Services The applicant, his successors or assigns shall comply with all requirements of the Department of Public Services. 10. Signage Per the requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for signage within an Entrance Corridor Overlay District (Section 8.2.6), any new proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved the City Planner and the Sign Review Committee prior to obtaining a Sign Permit. 11. Lighting a. If any new lighting is proposed, the applicant shall submit a plan for the proposed lighting to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. c. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. d. After installation, any new lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner,prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. • 220 Highland Avenue April 14,2015 Page 5 of 6 is 12. Pedestrian Access The applicant shall maintain the shoulder area along Highland Avenue free from obstructions, in order to allow free movement of pedestrians and to accommodate potential future improvements and installation of a public sidewalk by MassDOT. 13.Landscaping a. Any street trees removed as a result of construction shall be replaced. The location of any replacement trees shall be approved by the City Planner prior to replanting. b. All existing trees shall be protected during construction. 14. Complete Streets A bicycle rack with capacity for three (3)to five(5) bicycles shall be provided on-site. Additional bicycle racks shall be provided as necessary, based on employee interest. 15. Maintenance a. Refuse removal, recycling, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. b. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The Applicant, his successors or assigns, shall guarantee any new trees and shrubs for a • two-(2) year period, from issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. c. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. 16. As-built Plans a. As-built Plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Services prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. b. The As-built plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer in electronic file format suitable for the City's use and approved by the City Engineer,prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. c. A completed tie card, a blank copy (available at the Engineering Department) and a certification signed and stamped by the design engineer, stating that the work was completed in substantial compliance with the design drawing must be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy; as well as, any subsequent requirements by the City Engineer. 17. Violations Violation of any condition contained herein shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. 0 220 Highland Avenue April 14,2015 Page 6 of 6 • I hereby certify that a copy of this decision has been filed with the City Clerk and is on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20)days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant, his successors or assigns, shall pay the fee for recording or registering. Charles A Puleo Chairman • City of Salem— Planning Board Meeting Minutes— March 19, 2015 Page 1 of 7 • City of Salem Planning Board Meeting Minutes Thursday, March 19, 2015 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, December 18, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 313,Third Floor, at 120 Washington Street,Salem, Massachusetts. Chairman Puleo opened the meeting at 7:08pm. Roll Call Those present were: Chuck Puleo, Chair, Ben Anderson, Vice Chair, Randy Clarke, Kirt Rieder, Dale Yale, Bill Griset, Matthew Veno and Noah Koretz.Absent: Helen Sides. Also present: Dana Menon,Staff Planner, and Pamela Broderick, Planning Board Recording Clerk. Approval of Minutes December 18,2014 Regular Meeting Minutes No comments or corrections were made by the Planning Board members. • Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to approve the December 18 2014 Regular Meeting Minutes,seconded by Ben Anderson. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor and none(0) opposed. Regular Agenda_ _ _ Location: 220 Highland Avenue (Map 8, Lot 0124) Applicant: Tropical Products, Inc. Description: A public hearing for an application for Site Plan Review,to consider an application to remove the existing silos and to extend the building along Highland Avenue,with a 574 square foot addition to the first floor, and a 3,485 square foot addition to the second floor. Documents and Exhibitions: • Site Plan Review Application dated February 24, 2015 • Plan of Land, prepared by B&R Survey, 100 Grove Street, Worcester, MA; dated February 17, 2015 • Existing Building/ Proposed Project Site Plan & Elevations pages C-1,A-1 thru A-4 from MBA International Architects, dated February 24, 2015 • Correspondence from MBA International Architects to Salem City Chief Engineer dated March 10, 2015 & March 11, 2015. Atty George Atkins of Ronan, Segal & Harrington, 59 Federal Street, presented for the applicant. • Additional presenters included: City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—March 19, 2015 Page 2 of 7 • William Medinger,AIA, president& principal, MBA International Architects,44 Washington . Street, Melrose MA • Ed Berman, President, Tropical Products, 220 Highland Avenue,Salem, MA. • Renee Dionne,Vice President Finance &Operations,Tropical Products, 220 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA. Atty Atkins introduced the project team in attendance. His overview remarks highlighted two matters: • There is some urgency because of the partial roof collapse over the winter,which occurred in the oldest part of the building.This project will also address the roof issue.The applicant hopes for a favorable decision at this meeting. • Zoning Board of Appeals granted needed approvals at its March 18, 2015 meeting. Atty Atkins also provided an overview of the scope of the project; illustrated by the submitted drawings: • Small increase in the building footprint on southeast corner of existing building by removing existing silos, adding approximately 500 square feet. • Addition of a second floor • Addition will match the present building's exterior materials. • No additional changes to the building or landscaping are proposed. o For clarification,the Board asked if the existing curb cut adjacent to the silos will remain. Atty Atkins advised there will not be deliveries there but the curb cut will remain.All loading dock facilities are at the rear of the building and will remain at the present location. Mr. Berman continued the presentation and discussed the business factors leading to the building • expansion.The company manufactures personal care, household and pet products.The business employs 50 people and is growing, and needs more room to operate. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday,730am-5pm.The required high quality standards prohibit adding a second shift;they would prefer to expand the capacity of the first shift. Board Discussion: Mr. Anderson noted the following short falls in the submission as compared to ordinance requirements. While sensitive to the urgency of the project timeline, he observed the Board has a responsibility to apply a consistent approach to all projects.Areas of concern that require more information: • Traffic flow/circulation (in relation to the 10 additional parking spots being striped in the existing lot): o Parking Ordinance page 23 paragraph 2; cannot provide vehicular parking in same area as loading area. Need to see truck turning radii and understand how trucks get in/out of loading bay in compliance with the ordinance.Truck turning radii should be on the drawings. o Wants to understand the basis for the parking space calculation; not certain all 10 spaces are needed.These specifics must be part of the submission. o Requirement for spaces is technically 39,versus the 45 total they are seeking. Atty Atkins advised there are 0 company vehicles, and 25 spaces for the 50 employees, plus 14 spaces based on the square-footage of the building in non-storage use. o Existing 2 trailers at the rear of the property are supplemental storage;will be removed when the second floor addition is available. • City of Salem—Planning Board ! Meeting Minutes—March 19, 2015 Page 3 of 7 • • Will there be additional lighting on the new exterior of the building? • Submission documents include correspondence relating to the current roof drain; please clarify and advise what the plan is for drainage from the new roof. o Atty Atkins advised the current system directs roof runoff to the parking lot;this will also be the case with the new roof. o Ms. Menon advised the City Engineer is comfortable with a condition being written into the decision stating that the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer a drainage plan showing how the roof runoff for the addition will be handled, for approval prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. • Where are wetlands on the property?Atty Atkins advised wetlands are to the northwest of the property, the buffer runs through the parking lot. o The Board indicated that the location of wetlands must appear on the submitted plans. • Confirm the addition is on top of existing first floor walls, no new hole. Floorplans for the addition would clarify. Why windows on 2nd floor if just storage? o Mr. Medinger advised the wash-down function is critical to the business; the plan is to expand the wash-down area to utilize most of the first floor, and move storage to the second floor. o The plan is to go up 14 feet for a 2nd floor(not a double-height space). o The small lab on the drawing (first floor) is used for quality control tests before product released to production lines. o Hot water tanks used for wash-down are on the first floor. o Structure will be new within the existing masonry walls. • o The second floor will be all storage;the windows are included to refine the elevation of the building. o The three (3) loading dock doors and docks at the rear of the building that currently exist will remain. Additional Discussion: The Board observed the present curb cut for silos does not need to remain at the current width. In the spirit of the Complete Streets policy, it can and should be narrowed. Atty Atkins advised this will require a permit from Massachusetts Department of Transportation (Mass DOT).The Board agreed, the applicant will need to seek a permit from Mass DOT for the required work. Ms. Menon advised the Complete Streets working group representative provided comments for this project.This is the first project to be reviewed by the Complete Streets representative. Some of the comments may not be a good fit for a project of this scope. She noted that some comments relate to sidewalks along Highland Avenue,which is a state highway.The Planning Department staff recommends focusing on the following recommendations: • 4-5-foot ADA accessible sidewalk to connect building entrance to the gravel shoulder along Highland Avenue. • Bicycle racks " The Board discussed recommending that the applicant replace the gravel shoulder along their frontage on Highland Avenue with a paved concrete sidewalk that would maintain ADA accessibility around the fire hydrant, connect to the existing 6-foot wide sidewalk in front of the Pep Boys location on the south • side, and to the property line on the north side. City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—March 19, 2015 Page 4 of 7 o Atty Atkins observed that permitting maybe required from Mass DOT to do any • sidewalk work. The Board clarified the additional points: • Next Planning Board Meeting is scheduled for April 2, 2015 • Conservation Commission has determined this project does not include any work that falls under their jurisdiction. • Does waste water from wash-down process require treatment? o Mr. Berman advised the wash-down waste water drains to back of the building and ultimately to the sewer system.Water does not require special treatment. Prior business operation did use an onsite treatment plant before connecting to the sewer. When Tropical Products moved in the SESD required analysis;the report indicated the waste water from their operation is no more toxic than from residential home outflows; no hazardous chemicals are in use at the plant. Chair Puleo opened the meeting for public comment: • Michael Panneton, 19 Greenlawn Ave; concerned about impact during the construction phase. Prior experience with the build-out of Pep Boys, CVS/Dunkin Donuts and other nearby Highland Avenue businesses were disastrous. Construction needs to be limited to business hours. Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to continue the public hearing to the Planning Board's next regularly scheduled meeting on April 2,2015, seconded by Ben Anderson. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr.Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Vale, Mr. Griset Mr. Veno • and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. Location: 162&150 Federal Street(Map 26, Lots 2&96) Applicant: Renewal Ventures, LLC,Assignee of rights granted to William Wharff Description: Board discussion and vote on the request for a six (6) month extension to commence constructions authorized by the September 25, 2012 Site Plan Review and Flood hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight (8) residential units. Documents and Exhibitions: • Planning Board decision to grant six (6) month extension stamped October 1, 2014 (meeting on September 18, 2014) • Correspondence from Atty George Atkins, written request for second extension, dated March 11, 2015 Atty George Atkins of Ronan, Segal & Harrington, 59 Federal Street, presented for the applicant. Additional presenters included: • David Pabich, Principal,Salem Renewal, LLC, 141 Washington Street. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—March 19, 2015 Page S of 7 • Atty Atkins advised that since the Board approved this project in 2012, it was discovered that an oil spill on the adjacent property has migrated to affect this parcel.There are multiple parties now involved in the parcels and clean-up. Environmental mitigation & submission of the final report of the onsite oil spill has not been completed, which has prevented conclusion of the purchase of the property by the permit assignee. Mitigation work has been done and is now being monitored. Final Solution documentation needs to be presented to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.There are at minimum two (2) LSP's involved in monitoring and approving the clean-up. Once the environmental issues are resolved,the purchase, a potential ANR filing, and other steps will be taken to move this complicated project ahead. Mr. Pabich explained the history of the spill. It originated with an underground oil tank likely installed by the Catholic Archdiocese in what was a convent building at the time (now an office building owned by AG Hess).The leaking apparently went on for some decades.A migrating plume was identified around 2009 that originated on 162 Federal Street,and had migrated toward 150 Federal Street. Clean-up measures have included vacuum extraction and injection of an enzyme agent to neutralize the remaining hazardous material.The LSP for the Archdiocese needs to determine if all possible clean-up measures have been taken or if more must be done.The solution will likely include an "activity use limitation". Board Discussion: The Board noted the oil spill was an issue when the first site plan was approved in 2012.The Board has • already granted one six-month extension past the two-year life of the site plan approval. How long should any project be allowed to extend start of construction on an approved site plan?Should Board call for new site plan given the period of inactivity?Chair Puleo cited other projects that involved extensive delays for various reasons. After discussing the slow decision-making on the part of the current property owner and its LSP,The Board ultimately agreed to grant one more extension, noting their reluctance to grant further extensions in the event there is no additional activity or new findings. Motion and Vote: Ben Anderson made a motion to grant the request for a six(6)month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25,2012 Site plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for a conversion of a former convent to eight(8) residential units;said approval now to expire September 25, 2015, seconded by Randy Clarke. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Vale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz)and none (0)opposed. Location: 405-427 Highland Avenue (Map 3, Lots 74,75 &76) Applicant: Paul Ferragamo Description: Board discussion and vote on an application for endorsement of a plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control (ANR), proposing to subdivide the existing three lots at 405-427 Highland Avenue(map 3, Lots 74, 75&76) into five lots. • City of Salem—Planning Board Meeting Minutes—March 19, 2015 Page 6 of 7 Documents and Exhibitions: • • Land Subdivision Plan of Land for 4 Residential Lots#405-427 Highland Avenue, prepared by Patrowicz Land Development Engineering & North Shore Survey Corporation, both at 14 Brown Street; dated March 6, 2015. • City of Salem For A Application for Endorsement of Plan Believed Not to Require Approval, dated March 12, 2015. Atty George Atkins of Ronan,Segal & Harrington, 59 Federal Street, presented for the applicant. Atty Atkins provided a brief overview; the site has extensive elevation rise and rock ledge with a lot of stone to be removed.This negatively impacts the return on investment to develop this property. Originally permitted for approximately 14 lots;the plan has been revised a couple of times based on the limitations imposed by topography.There has been some preliminary discussion with Massachusetts DOT about the Highland Avenue curb cuts that will be required by the proposed subdivision. Board Discussion • Atty Atkins clarified for the Board, the existing driveway from Clark Street into lots 4 and 5 will be relocated and a new driveway will be added for lot 5;joint driveways prohibited due to emergency vehicle access reasons.These driveways will access Clark Street. • Board confirmed the request will be for three (3)curb cuts for lots 1, 2 &3, directly onto Highland Avenue. • Board discussed the possibility of shared driveways as a strategy to reduce the number of curb cuts needed onto Highland Avenue. Again, any joint driveway configuration must provide for • turning radius and emergency vehicle access. • Board observed it is poor urban development to create 5 curb cuts for 5 lots,and particularly 3 curb cuts for single-family homes directly onto Highland Avenue. Motion and Vote: Dale Yale made a motion to endorse the plan believed not to require approval under Subdivision Control(ANR), to subdivide the existing three lots at 405-427 Highland Avenue into five lots, seconded by Kirt Rieder. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Rieder, Ms. Yale, Mr. Griset, Mr. Veno and Mr. Koretz) and none(0)opposed. Old/New Business • 28 Goodhue update; staff followed up with the owners regarding the gate installed across the multiuse path. Ms. Menon reported that the developer agreed to remove the gate once the snow melts enough to allow access.The gate had been installed after the last inspection. o Board directed staff to send correspondence to the owner allowing thirty(30) days to de-install the gate and hardware or he will be in violation of the approved Site Plan (not withstanding any existing snow/ice that may need to be removed to complete the work).Said correspondence should also be copied to the Building Department. o If the gate does not appear on the "as built" plan on file with the Building Department, the developer is in clear violation of the conditions of the occupancy permit. o Board also requested Planning Staff to reach out to the City Solicitor seeking an opinion on whether the Planning Board can require the occupancy permit be revoked for • City of Salem—Planning Board 1 Meeting Minutes—March 19, 2015 Page 7 of 7 owners in violation of approved site plans? If not, what recourse is there for enforcement of Site Plans approved by the Planning Board? • Mr. Koretz asked staff to research whether the city composting pilot program will be renewed, and if the Planning Board can require that composting be included in the Planning Board's conditions for approval of future residential projects of a certain size (parameters to be determined). o The Board discussed the best way to add both recycling and composting to the required approvals for multi-family developments of a certain size. Chair Puleo noted there is not even,a requirement for recycling at multi-unit developments.The Board agreed that simply withholding approval of Site Plans until these services are added to plans seems insufficient, as enforcement of all aspects of approved Site Plans is an area that needs to be addressed by the City(see above item). Staff was asked to research and recommend next steps on the matter of composting and recycling requirements for development Projects. Adjournment Motion and Vote: Randy Clarke made a motion to adiourn the meeting, seconded by Dale Yale. The vote was unanimous with eight(8)in favor(Mr. Puleo, Mr.Anderson, Ms Sides Ms. Yale Mr. Clarke Mr. Rieder, Mr. Griset and Mr. Veno) and none (0)opposed • Chairman Puleo adjourned the meeting at 8:35pm. For actions where the decisions have not been fully written into these minutes, copies of the decisions have been posted separately by address or project at: http://www.salem.com/Pages/SalemMA PlanMin/ Respectfully submitted, Pamela Broderick, Recording Clerk Approved by the Planning Board on 4/2/2015 Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance §2-2028 through §2-2033. • • City of Salem — Meeting Sign-In Sheet Board YIUNV-\," Date Name Mailing Address Phone # Email r I/ t� �,/�FQ 7 cog t R/I 9�ti !'2-f L U-0701�iv�K�n@� tC�t�K•h/ �) °74j 2�7 1�wT L Uzi% L 0AS (.c• to CiI& �qS' �6�d _1 ��lt � C�ac,�� .IIeI e Pq n��r .k Page of CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD March 26, 2015 2015 MSR 2b Renewal Ventures, LLC FILE # c/o George W. Atkins III f1TY CLERK, SALEM. MASS. Ronan, Segal & Harrington 59 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 162 & 150 Federal Street (Map 26, Lots 2 & 96) Decision of Planning Board to grant request for a six (6) month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25,2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight(8) residential units. The Salem Planning Board met on Thursday, March 19, 2015 to discuss your request for the approval of a six (6)month extension to commence construction authorized by the September 25, 2012 Site Plan Review and Flood Hazard District Special Permit Planning Board Decision for conversion of a former convent to eight (8)residential units. letter submitted by Attorney George W. Atkins, 111, on behalf of Renewal Ventures, LLC, on February 18, 2015, requests allowance to extend the permits granted by the Planning Board in a Decision date- stamped September 25, 2012, for an additional period of six (6)months. The petitioner states that the additional time is necessary in order in order to complete environmental remediation of the property— mitigation work has been done, but the monitoring and final report required to be submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection is ongoing. The action required is expected to be completed within the requested extension period. The requested six-month extension would commence on March 25, 2015, which is the expiration date of the current Decision. The requested extension would expire on September 25, 2015. The Planning Board voted eight(8) in favor(Charles Puleo—Chair,Dale Yale, Ben Anderson, Matthew Veno, Kirt Rieder,Noah Koretz, Randy Clarke, and Bill Griset) and none (0) opposed,to grant the approval of the requested six 6 month extension of the Flood Hazard District Special Permit and Site Plan Review p eview Decision dated September 25, 2012. This determination shall become part of the record for this project. If you require further information,please contact Dana Menon, Staff Planner, in the Department of Planning & Community Development at(978) 619-5685. Sincerely, 4har les Puleo, Chairman em Planning Board Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SALEM ' PLANNING BOARD • 1015 MAR 23 A If.- .s7 CITY CLERK,SALEM, MkS3 Form A — Decision 405 — 427 Highland Avenue �a 3, Lots 74, 75, and 76) On March 19, 2015,the Salem Planning Board voted 8-0 (Charles Puleo, Dale Yale,Ben Anderson, Kirt Rieder,Noah Koretz,Randy Clarke,Matthew Veno, and Bill Griset) to endorse "Approval Under Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant: Paul Ferragamo 2. Location: 405—427 ' HtghLwd Avenue (Map 3,Lots 74, 75, and 76) Project Description: The applicant requests to subdivide the existing three lots at 405-427 Highland Avenue (Map 3,Lots 74, 75 & 76) into five lots, each of which meet the minimum lot frontage requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. • The endorsed plan is titled"Land Subdivision Plan of Land for 5 Residential Lots for a site at#405- 427 Highland Ave. Salem, Massachusetts" by Patrowicz Land Development Engineering, 14 Brown Street, Salem,MA 01970 and North Shore Survey Corporation, 14 Brown Street, Salem, MA 01970, dated March 6, 2015. Sincerely, Charles M. Puleo Chair Cc: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 ' WWW.SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD FILE # . CITY CLERK, SALEM .--- _ MASS, Public Hearing Notice City of Salem Planning Board Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the application of TROPICAL PRODUCTS, INC. for a Site Plan Review for the property located at 220 HIGHLAND AVE (Map 8, Lot 0124). The application proposes to remove the existing silos and to extend the building along Highland Avenue, with a 574 square foot addition to the first floor, and a 3,485 square foot addition to the second floor. The public hearing will be held on Thurs, March 19, 2015 at 7:00 PM, at 120 Washington St, 3`d floor, room 313, in accordance with Chapter 40A of the Mass. General Laws. A copy of the application and plans are on file and available for review during normal business hours at the Dept. of Planning& •Community Development, 3`d Floor, 120 Washington St., Salem, MA. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Planning Board Ad to Run Dates in Salem News: March 5 and 12, 2015 r This notice posted on "Offic' Bulletin�oard" City_l all, Salem, Mass. on - � a� D /U� atin accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, 0.a Sections 1>1-25. Know Your Fights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A 18-25 and City Ordinance 2-2028 through 2-2033. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM T , CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 FEB 2b P S. 25 FILE # , JALLM. MASS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday,March 5,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. 0r " /c Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board • This notice posted on "Off I tsulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on reg a6, at�;'asPM m accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L a 30A 5 18-25 and City Ordinance�2-2028 through 5 2-2033. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 • WWW,SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 FEB 12 P 1: 31 PILL # CITY CLERK, SALEM,MASS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, February 19,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board r This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on FEB 12 2015 at /�1/x in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, So�tions 18-25. Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Lam M.G.L c. 30A5 18-25 and City Ordinance 52-2028 through 52-2033. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . www.sALEM.com P CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 JAN 29 P 1: 49 FI�E ii CITY CLERK, SAA LEM, WiSS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. v 'm �/cJs Charles M Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board • This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on JAN 2 9 2015 at i ,L(/�/tf in accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. Knowyour righty under the Open Meeting I-aw M.G.L c. 30A f 18-25 and City Ordinance§2-2028 through ff 2-2033. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 ' WWW.SALEM.COM 0CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 JAN 22 P 4: 09 EITY GLEVA SRLEM,MASS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's scheduled meeting on Thursday, January 29,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street,has been canceled due to a lack of agenda items. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board • This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" Ci Hall, Salem, Mass. on JAN g 2 yp1 at in accordance wit M hap. 30A, Se tions 18-25. Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Law MG.L c. 30A S 18-25 and City Ordinance 5 2-2028 through 5 2-2033. 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 • PHONE 978.619.5685 FAx 978.740.0404 • WWW.SALEM.COM 08QCITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 2015 JAN -8 P 2. 09 FILE N CITY CLERK. SALEM. MASS'. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board's scheduled meeting on Thursday, January 15,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex, Room 313, 120 Washington Street,has been canceled due to a lack of agenda items. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board • a This notice posted on "Official Bulletin. Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on JAN ,0 8 2015 at in accordance with MGL Chap.30A, Sections 18-25. Knowyour rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30A 118-25 and City Ordnance 5 2-2028 through ff 2-2033. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 - WWW.SALEM.COM CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1015 JAN -8 P 2- 09 FILE ff G1TY CLERK. SALEM.MASS. Meeting Cancellation Notice You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Boards scheduled meeting on Thursday, January 15,2015 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Annex,Room 313, 120 Washington Street, has been canceled due to a lack of agenda items. Charles M. Puleo, Chair Salem Planning Board • A This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hail, Salem, Mass. on JAN 0 8 2015 at Z :C 9 VH , in accordance with MGL Chap.30A, Sections 18-35. Knawyour rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L c. 30,4 f 18-25 and City Ordinance f 2-2028 through 2-2033. • 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 ' PHONE 978.619.5685 FAX 978.740.0404 . www.sALEM.com