The URL can be used to link to this page

1999-PLANNING BOARD 'boats Iqgq CIi# of ttlrm, ttssttrl1usk # 4,S O FICE'� aszd m &t m 1990 INK 2 8 P 12: 1 b You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled meetings for 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman January July January 7, 1999 July 1, 1999 • January 21, 1999 July 15, 1999 February September February 4, 1999 September 2, 1999 February 18, 1999 September 16, 1999 March October March 4, 1999 October 7, 1999 March 18, 1999 October 21, 1999 April November April 1, 1999 November 4, 1999 April 15, 1999 November 18, 1999 May December May 6, 1999 December 2, 1999 May 20, 1999 December 16, 1999 June June3, 19.99 June 17, 1999 TAS "0066 Posited on 'OAlelal Bulletin Soars" "! .Hall AWa., Salem, Mass. on Dg at i,:i(i , 93A � �® of �.t.tXordance rerth G rap`A lgn�. i- . ^,`„S a,c •b ..L:_r,r' a OFFICE r 3 ' " ` �ltttvtin� �uttril F 1999 DEC I u A 9: 25 (line Salrm (Sreett NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, December 16, 1999, at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled. The next Planning Board meeting will be held on Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1999. : Walter B. Power, III Chairman Y T ^^ t1r hig `•., notice �;�'3�r_j :%i',Y Hall Ave., ie�.frm a,. Si:aajl ey' iJN at 9 : z ` LSAg 2 33 Gti1 � q q 3`tc. .7 LEM. 'SA . C lu of �Sttl>em, �Httssarl1risrits RK'S ICE Planning Poartb (1Dne Salem Grern 1459 l0J 30 A t0: 00 Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, December 2, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman • Tentative Agenda: 1. Public Hearing— Site Plan Review Special Permit and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit—266 Canal Street(7:30 PM—8:15 PM) 2. Continuation of Public Hearing— Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street (8:15 PM—9:00 PM) 3. Old/New Business (9:00 PM—9:10 PM) Tari; notico - IJ J::f E City rail Avg , e ". at /d:ao /1r71' 't" v? ;'- i ;: �1ou. 030• 1999 23A A 233 of hJ.G ^ Nk„ � , r� C;.sp. 3Z See. aitu, of 'Salem, 'MasoadjusVIts ;, �ltttming '�nttra Otte '5ttlem (Sxeett MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: November 29, 1999 RE: Agenda—December 2, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit—266 Canal Street The Planning Board will hold a public hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance and a Special Permit under the Wetlands and Flood Hazard District (Section 7-16) at the request of John Bertini for the property located at 266 Canal Street. The proposed project includes the change of use of the building from a market to a boat storage facility. There will be no external changes to the existing building made, except for the installation of an overhead door and a ramp. In addition, the applicant proposes the installation of a new water line and new sewer line from Canal Street to the structure. Approximately thirty (30) boats will be stored within the former industrial building and an additional thirty (30) boats will be stored on the outside. The site has been utilized as an existing retail use. This site plan represents a change in use for the site. The Zoning Ordinance requires that any change in use of a premises requires site plan review. This project was approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Permit to allow use of the premises for boat storage and maintenance. The Special Permit was approved on October 20, 1999. A copy of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision has been provided in your packet. This project as it is shown on the site plan meets the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The proposed improvements to the premises will be before the Conservation Commission at • their December 11, 1999 meeting. The parcel is located in a wetlands area. Comment sheets were distributed to the required Department heads. The Building Inspector PB Memorandum November 29, 1999-2 • returned a comment sheet which shows he concurs with the plan. Due to the limited construction associated with the plan, I have included a standard draft decision for your review. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street On Thursday, October 7, 1999, the Planning Board opened a Public Hearing under Section 7- 18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Van Ness Development Corporation for the property located at 155-189 Washington Street. The proposed project includes the demolition of the building located on the site, excluding approximately 9,000 square feet and the construction of a six story retail and assisted living mixed use building. The plan consists of approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 73,000 square feet (80 units) of assisted living on the remaining five floors. In addition, the plan shows the parking for 39 vehicles under the building. The Planning Board has discussed this project at their October 7, 1999, October 21, 1999 and November18, 1999 meetings. Many issues were discussed at these meetings. The following is a list of issues and conclusions drawn at the November 18, 1999 meeting: • The applicant proposed to redesign the Marketplace. The redesign would include providing a parking area for several vehicles and the retention of the Marketplace stalls. • The City would retain ownership of the Marketplace site and the parking would be public parking. The applicant agreed to provide the architecture and engineering to design the site and a project manager to oversee the construction. The applicant has not agreed to pay for any of the construction costs associated with the parking area. At this time, the City is unsure as to where the funds would be obtained to pay for the construction at this site. • The applicant discussed that widening Front Street would result in the loss of several trees. The Board expressed that the loss of trees would not be appropriate in the area. The Board still has concerns pertaining to the traffic on Front Street and the entering and exiting of vehicles to the site. Other than improvements to Front Street, the Board has not discussed any traffic mitigation for the project. A condition of approval for the Pickering Wharf Hotel was the donation of funds toward a corridor traffic study for the area from Riley Plaza to Derby Street's intersection with Webb Street. This project may lend itself to such a donation. • The Board discussed the access to the site on Front Street. It was suggested by the Board that the applicant revise the access so that there is only one form of ingress and egress from the site on Front Street. The applicant agreed to look into this matter. In addition, the Board requested that the applicant verify that the turning radius was adequate for a truck to enter the site on Front Street. . • The Board discussed the Derby Street side of the building. It was commented that this side looked as if it were the side of a building and with Derby Street being such a vital street in the City, this elevation should be revised. The Board requested that the applicant PB Memorandum November 29, 1999-3 re-visit the elevation and revise it to resemble the front of a building. An elevation of the Derby Street side of the building has been provided in your packet. • The Board discussed the need for the applicant to obtain a release of the fagade easement and the approval of the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) for the project. The Board requested that it be determined as to when these processes would be complete and the Board's interaction with the SRA. It has been determined that City Council approval is necessary in order to release the fagade easement on the building. This request will not be before the City Council until January. The SRA has determined that it will not take a vote to demolish the building until the vote to release the fagade easement is complete. The SRA cannot send the request to their Design Review Board (DRB) until they vote to demolish the building, thus the applicant will not be before the DRB until January. The Board determined at their November 18, 1999 meeting that they did not want to not vote on the project until January. It has been suggested that a condition be placed on the approval which requires the applicant to return to the Planning Board with final plans and the Board will determine at that time whether the changes made to the plan require an amendment to the Site Plan Review approval. • The plans calls for the removal of two street trees located on Front Street. The applicant is required to receive approval from the City Arborist for the removal of the trees. The Board requested the applicant to review the required procedure with the City Arborist and • begin the process. A draft decision has been included in your packet for your review. • t Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, December 2, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, December 2, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Weiner, Bill Cullen, John Moustakis, Chuck Puleo, Lee Harrington, Gene Collins,Kim Driscoll and Carter Vinson. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Public Hearing - Site Plan Review Special Permit and Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit - 266 Canal Street Atty. George Atkins addressed the Board on behalf of his clients Dion's Boat Yard and John Bertin. He explained that the proposed project includes the change of use of the building from a market to a boat storage facility. He noted that there would be no external changes to the existing building except for the installation of an overhead door and ramp. In addition, the applicant proposes to install a new water line and new sewer line from Canal Street to the structure. A sprinkler system will also be installed as required by the Fire Department. Atty. Atkins stated that the Board of Appeals has approved a special permit to allow the • use of the premises for boat storage and maintenance. He also noted that they will be before the Conservation Commission next week for a Determination of Applicability. Atty. Atkins explained that the facility would be used primarily for the storage of boats and light maintenance will be performed and no chemicals will be stored on the premises. He also noted that in spring there would be preparation of the boats for launching and during the summer months there would be no activity. Carter Vinson asked if there would be enough room on the property for turnarounds. Atty. Atkins stated that the boats that would be stored there would be mostly sail boats and there should be no impact on traffic. Kim Driscoll questioned if this was the site that has trailers parked there presently. Mr. Bertin stated that the trailers should have no impact on this project. David Weiner asked if there would be any incidental sales on the site. Atty. Atkins stated that there should be no sales on the site. He explained that Dion's would only be doing light repairs. Page 1 • Walter Power questioned if the owners of the boats would be allowed to work on the • boats. Fred Atkins of Dion's Boat Yard explained that all work done on the boats would be done by employees. Atty. Atkins noted that there may be some instances when an owner would come and remove their equipment from a boat. Chuck Puleo asked if there would be any changes made to the parking area. Atty. Atkins stated that the only work that would be done in the parking area would be the excavation for the installation of the sewer line. Kim Driscoll noted that they are applying for a Determination of Applicability from the Conservation Commission and asked if they are anticipating any problems. Atty. Atkins stated that he did not see that there would be any problems with the Commission unless they have to do site work. Walter Power asked what the condition of the parking lot was. Atty. Atkins stated that it is well compacted and it has been an active site so they do not have any plans to do any grading. Walter Power read comments from other city Boards and Commissions. The Building Inspector concurs with the project. The Conservation Commission will review the project at its meeting on December 11, 1999. The Fire Department concurs with the plan. Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. • Ward Seven Councillor Elect Joseph O'Keefe addressed the Board and expressed his concern that it is inappropriate for the Planning Board to act on this without a decision from the Conservation Commission. He expressed his concern about the impact that this project would have on the proposed bike path and the proposed work to be done to alleviate the flooding problems in the area of Rosie's Pond. Mr. O'Keefe asked if the boats that would be stored on the site would have any fuel in them and suggested that the applicant should have license for the storage of fuel on the premises. Atty. Atkins stated that the boats would have diesel fuel in them, but there would be no storage tanks of fuel on the property. Walter Power noted that a license for the storage of fuel on the property is not in the perview of the Planning Board, but noted that the approval stipulates that all necessary permits and licenses shall be obtained by the applicant. Fred Atkins noted that Dion's Boat Yard has a license from the Salem Fire Department for the storage of flammable material on the site. Mr. O'Keefe expressed his concern about the possibility of the boats leaking fuel and the runoff to the resource area. Atty. Atkins stated that they are not causing any additional runoff to the site, since they are not altering the topography. • Page 2 r Mr. O'Keefe noted that he did not think that the Board should be making a decision based • on a memo from the agent of the Conservation Commission and the Commission itself. Carter Vinson explained that it is at the discretion of the Board and they take projects on a case by case basis and it depends on the level of work being done. Kim Driscoll noted that regardless of whether the Board votes before or after the decision of the Conservation Commission it is always contingent upon the decision of the Commission. Motion made by Bill Cullen to issue a special permit for 266 Canal Street, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. The Board reviewed a draft decision for the project. It was requested that the City Engineer review the electric utilities to see if they are adequate. Atty. Atkins addressed the Board and noted that the fee for Site Plan Review is $1,500.00 and since their project is a change in use rather that new construction and requested to have a portion of the fee waived. Chuck Puleo noted that when the Board discussed the new fee structure, there was a discussion about that. Walter Power stated that he raised a good point and requested that Atty. Atkins put the request in writing for the next meeting. He also recalled that this is something that the Board has talked about in the past. • Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review Special Permit - Assisted Living Center and Retail Space - 155 - 189 Washington Street Atty. Atkins addressed the Board and explained that the Architect and the Engineer for the project are unable to be here this evening. He noted that the Board has a list of concerns and they would try to address the ones that they can. He noted that one concern is that of the facade easement and noted that the City Solicitor has determined that the release of the facade easement needs the approval of the City Council. He explained that the SRA would like the City Council to release the Facade Easement before they review the project. There is also the matter of the issuance of a Demolition Permit from the SRA before the DRB can review the project. Kim Driscoll addressed the Board and stated that in fairness to the applicant the Board should issue a decision and if the other Boards in question make changes to the plan that will alter the approval the applicant will have to come back to the Planning Board with the changes and amend the plan. Councillor At Large Tom Furey addressed the Board and expressed his reservations about the Facade Easement going to the City Council before the Planning Board and the SRA have acted on the plan. He suggested that approvals of the two boards should avoid any delays with the City Council. • Page 3 Carter Vinson noted that the Boards are appointed and it is incumbent upon them to act • on the projects before them. He suggested that the Board could hammer out the details of the plan and keep the public hearing open until the other Boards issue a decision. Kim Driscoll stated that she is uncomfortable doing that noting that a condition can be crafted that specifies that the developer has to come back to the Planning Board should any changes be made by the other Boards. She also noted that several attempts have been made to have a joint meeting with the Boards on this matter and it has not happened and in fairness to the developer, they will be down one member who would be eligible to vote on the project, since she will be leaving the Board when she takes office in January. Atty. Atkins agreed and stated that they understand that they are taking a risk and would have to come back if any changes are made. Walter Power agreed that the Planning Board has protection if any changes are made by the other Boards. Walter Power noted that this is a substantial project with an impact on the downtown and he is concerned about inadequate parking. He noted that discussions have been held about revamping the market place and asked the applicant to comment on that. Denise Sullivan addressed the Board and stated that the Mayor is happy with the concept • of revamping the market place to increase parking and would like to leave the pervue of the design to the Market and Tourism Commission. Ms. Sullivan also noted that she did not know when funding might be available for that project. Atty. Atkins noted that there are 40 spaces on the site and the.developer is willing to do the design the project and absorb the soft costs of the project. Walter Power stated that he knows of no other way to guarantee the additional parking than to have the developer put up money for it. Kim Driscoll noted that the occupants of the retail space could use the parking garage and the 40 spaces may be sufficient. Atty. Atkins noted that the parking requirement for the project has been met. Walter Power stated that in addition to the services that the developer has offered he would like to see them put $50,000.00 up for parking. Bill Cullen disagreed noting that it is hard to demand money from the developer for construction of something they will not own. He referred to the parking analysis and noted that they have agreed to assist with the redesign of the Market Place. Atty. Atkins noted that the owners would be paying taxes. He also noted that the zoning language for a B5 zone calls for the city to assume the parking. Walter Power stated that other developers have assisted when their projects are impacting a city in other communities. • Page 4 • Kim Driscoll noted that we don't have linkage and the developer has agreed to make a contribution in the form of design services and supervision of the construction. She noted that we can't make a condition if the developer has made an offer to contribute. Carter Vinson noted that he is concerned about the building because of the inadequate parking. Motion made by Carter Vinson to require the developer to provide architectural services, engineering services and project management for the redesign of the Market Place and some portion of construction not to exceed $50,000, seconded by Lee Harrington: Discussion of the motion: Bill Cullen stated that he was hesitant to put a project of this size in jeopardy. Chuck Puleo noted that the applicant did not ask for any tax credits for the project. He noted that he has a problem asking a developer for money when the city will get the full tax benefit from the project. There being no further discussion on the matter, Walter Power called for a vote on the motion. The motion failed 2 - 7 with Walter Power and Carter Vinson voting in favor. • Motion made by Gene Collins to close the Public Hearing seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. The Board reviewed a draft decision for the project. Kim Driscoll suggested a condition that the entry and exit circulation on the property be subject to a review by the Planning Department within six months of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Atty. Atkins agreed to that condition. Motion made by Lee Harrington to approve the decision for the Assisted Living Center 155 - 189b Washington Street as amended, seconded by Gene Collins and approved 8-1 with Carter Vinson opposed. Old/New Business Fafard Property Lee Harrington requested that Harry Mack be invited to the first meeting in January to discuss outstanding issues with the Fafard project. • Page 5 J Status of Retail Space in the South Harbor Garage Lee Harrington asked what the status was of the retail space in the South Harbor Garage. Denise Sullivan reported that the state has released the garage to the city and the City Council needs to approve the RFP for the retail space and she expects that to happen in January. Vincent's Site Walter Power noted that the Vincent's proposed project will be on the agenda for.the Board of Appeal. He suggested that the Board send a letter to the ZBA outlining their concern about the loss of commercial property and the effect it would have on the surrounding parcels on Highland Avenue. Motion made by John Moustakis to send a letter to the ZBA regarding the Vincent's project, seconded by Carter Vinson and approved unanimously. Change in Meeting Date Denise Sullivan addressed the Board and noted that she would be away the first week in January when the Board would normally meet. She asked that they change the date of the meeting from January 6, 2000 to January 13, 2000. The Board decided that the 13'" would be the next meeting of the Planning Board. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eil en M. Sacco, Clerk' Salem Planning Board PB120299 Page 6 C lu of 'Salmi, �sttrl2usk�##s '1Ytartrtin$ Pourtb One 'Mem (grgell Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday,Novemberl8, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III r -- Chairman Joint Meeting with the Zoning Board of Appeals (6:30 PM— 7:30 PM) • Tentative Agenda: 1. Form A Subdivision— 127 Marlborough Road (7:30 PM-7:40 PM) 2. Continuation of Public Hearing— Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street(7:40 PM — 8:40 PM) 3. Old/New Business (8:40 PM— 8:50 PM) • s�; �: "= SALEM. MA 9itU Of ,JUJfM, � lSoarl�USkf�S�•S OFFICE ��umc One j6ttlrm Green Iggq NOV 15 P 3: 58 NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold a joint meeting with the Zoning Board of Appeals pertaining to collaboration between the two Boards. The meeting is scheduled to be held on Thursday,November 18, 1999, at 6:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. 1 Walter B. Power, III • Chairman TNO notic@ POStedf On City Haid Ave., Salem 9�-official �Ul��trrt �, SO �m. . (67�.`,sJ. On �evFlt 23A & 238 of Blau. �s . 194Q Chap. 30 fie. Ctly of "ittliem, gassurlluutts • , ._ 19Itttnting r�uxra Mm $alpm Orem MEMORAND U M TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planneit Salem Planning Department ��D DATE: November 15, 1999 RE: Agenda—November 18, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A Subdivision — 127 Marlborough Road The Planning Board approved a Waiver from Frontage for one of the lots contained in this subdivision. This Form A plan will legally subdivide the lot into three lots. This plan is appropriate for the Board's approval. 2. Continuation ul'Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street On Thursday, October 7, 1999, the Planning Board opened a Public Hearing under Section 7- 18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Van Ness Development Corporation for the property located at 155-189 Washington Street. The proposed project includes the demolition of the building located on the site, excluding approximately 9,000 square feet and the construction of a six story retail and assisted living mixed use building. The plan consists of approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 73,000 square feet(80 units) of assisted living on the remaining five floors. In addition, the plan shows the parking for 39 vehicles under the building. The Planning Board has discussed this project at their October 7, 1999 and October 21, 1999 meetings. At the Board's October 21, 1999 meeting, several concerns and questions were brought up by the Board. The following is a list of those concerns and questions: • New traffic counts were brought before the Board. These counts were obtained from a • similar operating assisted living center. The counts were higher than those counts previously submitted to the Board. PB Memorandum November IG, 1999 - 2 • • The applicant discussed the heights of other buildings located in the downtown area..The Board further requested that elevations be drawn of the downtown area which show the street perspective. The perspective should be shown from Riley Plaza, the Post Office, and Washington Street. • The applicant stated that based on comments made by the Planning Board, the loading dock will now be an open air facility. The Board requested a rendering of the loading dock. • The Board discussed the Derby Street side of the building. It was commented that this side looked as if it were the side of a building and with Derby Street being such a vital street in the City, this elevation should be revised. The Board requested that the applicant re-visit the elevation and revise it to resemble the front of a building. • The Planning Board requested that the applicant review the possibility of pulling back the sidewalk on Front Street to make access better. • The Planning Board requested that the applicant provide floor plans of the assisted living center. • The Planning Board requested that the applicant provide information pertaining to the status of the financing applications. • The Planning Board discussed the possibility of the applicant redesigning the Salem Marketplace to provide parking and better access for the Marketplace. The applicant agreed to review possible designs with the Board. • There were concerns pertaining to the construction of the underground garage. The applicant agreed to provide the Board with a structural engineer's report on the garage and any soil testing conducted for the design of the garage. A report was provided and has been distributed to the City Engineer for his review. • It was discussed that there is a fapade easement on the building and the Board requested additional information on the easement and its release. The City Solicitor is currently reviewing the fagade easement and the procedure for its release. This information will be provided to the Board when it is complete. • The plans calls for the removal of two street trees located on Front Street. The applicant is required to receive approval from the City Arborist for the removal of the trees. The Board requested the applicant to review the required procedure with the City Arborist and begin the process. The Salem Redevelopment Authority discussed this project at their October 13, 1999 meeting. There was no action taken on the project. The applicant will be before the SRA at • their next meeting. � � �Iamting �nxrD (9ne j5xlem Green — NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF MEETINGCD- v *�r. m= You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held on T' Thursday,November 4, 1999, at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled. The next Planning Board meeting will be held on Thursday, November 18, 1999. 40-a9.l 4--r4-'rvG1 rwz Walter B. Power, III Chairman • Thi$ notica posted on "Ofiiciel Bulletin Board" Cltr Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on . -hoo. i, lvv9 le:14qy 19Mm 2 i a000t'da�s bi�M Chap. 38 Sec. 3A 23D of 1M.�.L. • s. LM, 11! -`K'S OFFICE t Ctu of '�5stt1Em, fflttssadjuselts 3 1 � �jZIYtltiIl� �IIMt'a 1999 OU 19 -� I I� I 1(Dne �ttlem (Srtett Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, October 21, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman • Tentative Agenda: 1. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street (7:30 PM—8:30 PM) 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit—435 Lafayette Street (8:30 PM—9:00 PM) 3. Old/New Business (9:00 PM—9:30 PM) Proposed Parker Brothers PUD Discussion rr4 naYle+ Poste d OT Gfj€. •€til Su€lbrin , :i;.`1 :, ` 3Ss. Ol+ OcT. 19. City Hail diva., , Or'-, 19. at II is ism , €ct —Cr( :. p 23rA A 239 of I�.C.�.� Chi#y ofStt[Pm, Httsttrl��s>�##s �a '. 1kanning nxrD (line $alem (Green MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: October 18, 1999 RE: Agenda—October 21, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street On Thursday, October 7, 1999, the Planning Board opened a Public Hearing under Section 7- 18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Van Ness Development Corporation for the property located at 155-189 Washington Street. The proposed project includes the demolition of the building located on the site, excluding approximately 9,000 square feet and the construction of a six story retail and assisted living mixed use building. The plan consists of approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 73,000 square feet(80 units) of assisted living on the remaining five floors. In addition, the plan shows the parking for 39 vehicles under the building. At the Board's October 7, 1999 meeting, several concerns and questions were brought up by the Board. The following is a list of those concerns and questions: • The location of the loading dock area needs additional review. The Board had concerns pertaining to its location on the busy Derby Street, trucks needing to back out onto Derby Street, and the view of a garage on Derby Street. The Board requested that the applicant review the location of the loading dock and provide information as to its most appropriate location, either Derby Street or Front Street. • The Board questioned where the additional uses in the building, the Salem Evening News • and the retail space, would load and unload. The applicant responded that the loading for those uses would occur on the street. The Board requested more specific information PB Memorandum October 18, 1999-2 • pertaining to this issue. • The Board had concerns as to the vitality of the retail space. It was requested that the applicant provide information pertaining to the future success of the retail space in downtown Salem. • There were concerns pertaining to the construction of the underground garage. Due to a lack of information provided by the applicant, the Board was unsure as to the possibility of an underground garage being constructed on the site. In addition, the Board expressed concerns pertaining to the soils in the area of the garage and their ability to support an underground facility. The applicant agreed to provide the Board with a structural engineer's report on the garage and any soil testing conducted for the design of the garage. • Several Board members had concerns pertaining to the height of the building. It was discussed that the six story building may not be in keeping with the surrounding buildings located in downtown Salem. The applicant agreed to provide an elevation of the street and the area to show the heights of existing buildings located in the downtown. This information will allow the Board to determine if the height of the building is in keeping with the surrounding area. • It was discussed that there is a fagade easement on the building and the Board requested • additional information on the easement and its release. The Salem Redevelopment Authority discussed this project at their October 13, 1999 meeting. There was no action taken on the project. The applicant will be before the SRA at their next meeting. In addition there are several concerns of the Planning Department which have not yet been addressed by the Board. The layout for the underground garage shows two parking spaces in which it will be extremely difficult for a vehicle to exit the space. The two spaces are labeled as 19 and 20. I recommend that the layout of the garage be revised to allow easy access from these two spaces. The Fire Department responded to the site plan and stated that the plans do not show the location of a hydrant on the Front Street side of the building near Derby Square. The plans do not show the location of handicap access to the building as well. In addition, the Fire Department requires a four inch story connection on the front of the building (Washington Street). The plans calls for the removal of two street trees located on Front Street. The applicant is required to receive approval from the City Arborist for the removal of the trees. At this time, • approval has not been given. Attached please find the information that was provided to the Board at there last meeting. The information includes the parking counts for their facility in Beverly and the background PB Memorandum October 18, 1999-3 • of the developer. 2. Public Hearing—Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit—435 Lafayette Street The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for a Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit for the parcel located at 435 Lafayette Street. The parcel is owned by Kenneth Gelpy. The plans show the construction of a single family dwelling, utilities, and landscaping within a buffer zone to a salt marsh and over land subject to coastal storm flowage. The dwelling is proposed to be two stories on 13,296 square feet of land. Both the dwelling and the driveway are proposed to be constructed on piles. The Salem Conservation Commission heard this request and denied the application in February, 1999. The Conservation Commission had concerns pertaining to the effect on the Coastal Banks' stability due to the removal of vegetation associated with the construction of the dwelling. The applicant then appealed to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). DEP reviewed the application and provided the applicant with a Superseding Order of Conditions on July 23, 1999. DEP required the applicant to provide a planting scheme, which would ensure that the areas below the proposed dwelling and the driveway will be replanted. Plans were submitted to the required Departments for their review. The City Engineer was the only Department which provided comments to the Planning Board. The City Engineer • made the following comments: • Plans submitted are not signed or stamped • Additional information is needed concerning the utility construction • Additional information is needed concerning the driveway construction • How is the integrity of the wall going to be maintained? These issues need to be addressed by the applicant. Enclosed please find information pertaining to the integrity of the stone wall and the elevations for the house. 3. Parker Brothers Proposed PUD Discussion The developers of the Old Parker Brothers site will be before the Board to informally discuss the proposed PUD for the site. Atty. Joseph Correnti will present the plans for the Board. • Or C#u IIfttlem, ��ppppttssttrl u5k` # cCFR�s°FFi� �rq • �` y L✓41 � 990 CF 3, ' �' ` �larutin$ �urrril OT @rre -Sttlent (Sruxt 2'2 9 Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, October 7, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda: • 1. Public Hearing— Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space — 155-189 Washington Street (7:30 PM—8:15 PM) 2. Public Hearing—Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit—435 Lafayette Street (8:15 PM—9:00 PM) 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Waiver From Frontage— 127 Marlborough Road (9:00 PM — 9:30 PM) 4. Preliminary Subdivision Plan Review— 1 I and 23 Outlook Avenue (9:30 PM —9:45 PM) 5. Old/New Business (9:45 PM— 10:00 PM) Proposed Parker Brothers PUD Discussion This natlea postod on °a6ilclal Bulletin Board" City Hall Ave., Salam, 144ass. on • at I � is a> artoa wt'l CT 4W9 . 2 3 A 2 of P .C.L. Cit#y ofStt1em, Httssttrl2usk�##s • • '. s Planning Pottrb (tine �$ttletn (Breen MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner VS Salem Planning Department DATE: October 4, 1999 RE: Agenda—October 1, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street On Thursday, October 7, 1999, the Planning Board will open a Public Hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Van Ness Development Corporation for the property located at 155-189 Washington Street. The proposed project includes the demolition of the building located on the site, excluding approximately 9,000 square feet and the construction of a six story retail and assisted living mixed use building. The plan consists of approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 73,000 square feet(80 units) of assisted living on the remaining five floors. In addition, the plan shows the parking for 39 vehicles under the building. The applicant proposes to construct the parking via an underground garage. Detailed plans of the underground garage have not been submitted to the City as of yet. The garage is proposed to be constructed at finished floor elevation 5.6 through 4.8. This is below the 100 year flood elevation of Salem, which is equivalent to elevation 14.39. There are concerns that there will be flooding in the garage. I have spoken to the City Engineer concerning the garage and it has been recommended that detailed plans and calculations be submitted for the Engineering Department's approval. Such information should be submitted as the type of waterproof material used, a pumping system in case of flooding, etc. In addition, as shown on the plans, the entrance to the garage is at a lower elevation than • Front Street. If the catch basins located on Front Street were to clog, as the entrance to the garage is shown, the run-off from Front Street would drain into the entrance to the garage. It is recommended that the entrance be designed so that it begins at an elevation higher than that of Front Street. PB Memorandum October 4, 1999-2 • The layout for the underground garage shows two parking spaces in which it will be extremely difficult for a vehicle to exit the space. The two spaces are labeled as 19 and 20. I recommend that the layout of the garage be revised to allow easy access from these two spaces. The Fire Department responded to the site plan and provided the following comments. The plans do not show the location of a hydrant on the Front Street side of the building near Derby Square. The plans do not show the location of handicap access to the building as well. In addition, the Fire Department requires a four inch story connection on the front of the building (Washington Street). The applicant was before the Zoning Board of Appeals at their September 15, 1999 meeting. The applicant requested an extension to variance approval, which expires in October. In addition, the applicant requested a variance to construct a site with a lot coverage of 70%. The applicant was previously approved for a lot coverage of 64%. The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the applicant's requests. The request is required to receive approval from the SRA and its Design Review Board. At this time, the applicant has applied to SRA, but has not yet been before the Board.. The plans calls for the removal of two street trees located on Front Street. The applicant is required to receive approval from the City Arborist for the removal of the trees. At this time, approval has not been given. There is lighting proposed to be located adjacent to the structure on Washington Street. Due to the close proximity of the lighting to Washington Street, I recommend that a lighting plan be submitted which will show if the lighting will cast a glare on the adjacent right of way. The main entrance to the site is located on Front Street. Front Street, due to its termination at the busy Washington Street and with its vaned pavement types, is a difficult roadway for travel. The applicant's traffic study recognizes this situation, but does not provide a recommendation as to mitigation. I recommend that the applicant's traffic engineer review the entrance and its effect on Front Street and provide recommendations as to possible mitigation. The presentation for this request will be made by Atty. George Atkins. 2. Public Hearing—Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit—435 Lafayette Street The Planning Board will open a Public Hearing for a Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Special Permit for the parcel located at 435 Lafayette Street. The parcel is owned by Kenneth Gelpy. The plans show the construction of a single family dwelling, utilities, and landscaping within a buffer zone to a salt marsh and over land subject to coastal storm flowage. The dwelling is proposed to be two stories on 13,296 square feet of land. Both the • dwelling and the driveway are proposed to be constructed on piles. The Salem Conservation Commission heard this request and denied the application in PB Memorandum October 4, 1999-3 February, 1999. The Conservation Commission had concerns pertaining to the effect on the • Coastal Banks' stability due to the removal of vegetation associated with the construction of the dwelling. The applicant then appealed to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). DEP reviewed the application and provided the applicant with a Superseding Order of Conditions on July 23, 1999. DEP required the applicant to provide a planting scheme, which would ensure that the areas below the proposed dwelling and the driveway will be replanted. In addition, DEP required the applicant to install a grate, a drain manhole and a two foot stump at the base of the stone wall located on the site and a four foot wide swale paved with six to twelve inch stone on the site. Both of these requirements are shown on the submitted plan. Plans were submitted to the required Departments for their review. The City Engineer was the only Department which provided comments to the Planning Board. The City Engineer made the following comments: • Plans submitted are not signed or stamped • Additional information is needed concerning the utility construction • Additional information is needed concerning the driveway construction • How is the integrity of the wall going to be maintained? Atty. George Atkins will be presenting the plans to the Planning Board. • 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Waiver From Frontage— 127 Marlborough Road These lots first came before the Board for approval for a cluster subdivision of thirteen lots. This request was approved by the Board and by the Conservation Commission, but several conditions put on by DEP made the project too costly to build. The applicant then applied to the Board with a Form A plan for several lots. During the meeting, the Board requested shared driveways. Following the Board's approval of that plan, the applicant applied with another Form A for the same area on Marlborough Road. The Board approved a plan which showed six lots. The access to the lots was not shown on the plan. Following the Board's approval of the Form A, the applicant is now before the Board requesting a Waiver From Frontage for the construction of an additional lot. The Public Hearing for the Waiver from Frontage was opened by the Planning Board at its July 16, 1998 meeting. The request shows the subdivision of seven lots. Lot#7 has approximately 46 feet of frontage and does not meet the Salem Zoning Ordinance Frontage requirements. The lot has received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance from the frontage requirements. When the Board reviewed this plan, the applicant had not yet been reviewed by the Conservation Commission. The Board suggested that the applicant receive approval from the Conservation Commission prior to it voting on the waiver. The applicant continued the Public Hearing until its review by the Conservation Commission was complete. The • Conservation Commission denied the application. The applicant appealed the decision to DEP and DEP issued a Superseding Order of Conditions. There is one lot shown on the plan, Lot#2, which does not meet Salem's frontage PB Memorandum October 4, 1999-4 • requirements. I am currently discussing this issue with the Attorney and expect to have a solution by the Planning Board meeting. Atty. Jack Kelty will be before the Board to present the plans. 4. Preliminary Subdivision Plan Review— 11 and 23 Outlook Avenue This is a preliminary review for a four lot subdivision. The subdivision will require variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals for both lot size and frontage. Following the Board's review of the Preliminary Subdivision, the applicant will require approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals and a Definitive Subdivision Plan from the Planning Board. Atty. George Atkins will be presenting the plans to the Planning Board. 5. Parker Brothers Proposed PUD Discussion The developers of the Old Parker Brothers site will be before the Board to informally discuss the proposed PUD for the site. Atty. Joseph Correnti will present the plans for the Board. • • Ti#u n# Stt�m, rlttsttrl�u�t�##s • ;,�..: jJlamting Poarb K `' _c One �$alrm (Sreett Y 6 P t� Tw n NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF MEETING 0 You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, September 16, 1999, at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled. The next Planning Board meeting will be held on Thursday, October 7, 1999. The Public Hearing for the Assisted Living and Retail Space request (155-189 Washington Street) will be heard at the October 7, 1999 Planning Board meeting. Walter B. Power, III • Chairman This notiem posted on "Official Suliatin Board' City Hail Av ., Salam, Mass. ori at /, y7 iMOOrdince SCEP6 1999 • 23A i 230 of Wi.U.L %' C :ap. Say. of *tent, f ttssarliumts (Om S fettt Green q F? Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, September 16,.1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman. R • Tentative Agenda:' S' 1._ Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space — 155-189 Washington Street(7:30 PM—8:30 PK 2. Old/New Business(8:30 PM—8:45 PK This notids posted on 'Official Bulletin Sward" Clry Hall A s , Salem, Mass. on ChSEP 14 9 at 1,7"29 /!� accordance V t3h S • 23A A 23B of A.L.dA.� ai#u of Salm, Anveadjusfits �' �lttmting '�nxra Orm �$xlem Great MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: September 14, 1999 RE: Agenda—September 16, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Assisted Living Center and Retail Space— 155-189 Washington Street On Thursday, September 16, 1999, the Planning Board will open a Public Hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Van Ness Development Corporation for the property located at 155-189 Washington Street. The proposed project includes the demolition of the building located on the site, excluding approximately 9,000 square feet and the construction of a six story retail and assisted living mixed use building. The plan consists of approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 73,000 square feet(80 units) of assisted living on the remaining five floors. In addition, the plan shows the parking for 39 vehicles under the building. The applicant proposes to construct the parking via an underground garage. Detailed plans of the underground garage have not been submitted to the City as of yet. The garage is proposed to be constructed at finished floor elevation 5.6 through 4.8. This is below the 100 year flood elevation of Salem, which is equivalent to elevation 14.39. There are concerns that there will be flooding in the garage. I have spoken to the City Engineer concerning the garage and it has been recommended that detailed plans and calculations be submitted for the Engineering Department's approval. Such information should be submitted as the type of waterproof material used, a pumping system in case of flooding, etc. In addition, as shown on the plans, the entrance to the garage is at a lower elevation than • Front Street. If the catch basins located on Front Street were to clog, as the entrance to the garage is shown, the run-off from Front Street would drain into the entrance to the garage. It is recommended that the entrance be designed so that it begins at an elevation higher than that of Front Street. PB Memorandum September 14, 1999-2 • The layout for the underground garage shows two parking spaces in which it will be extremely difficult for a vehicle to exit the space. The two spaces are labeled as 19 and 20. I recommend that the layout of the garage be revised to allow easy access from these two spaces. The Fire Department responded to the site plan and provided the following comments. The plans do not show the location of a hydrant on the Front Street side of the building near Derby Square. The plans do not show the location of handicap access to the building as well. In addition, the Fire Department requires a four inch story connection on the front of the building (Washington Street). The applicant will be before the Zoning Board of Appeals at their September 15, 1999 meeting. The applicant is requesting an extension to variance approval, which expires in October. In addition, the applicant is requesting a variance to construct a site with a lot coverage of 70%. The applicant was previously approved for a lot coverage of 64%. The request is required to receive approval from the SRA and its Design Review Board. At this time, the applicant has not applied to the SRA for approval of the plan. The plans calls for the removal of two street trees located on Front Street. The applicant is required to receive approval from the City Arborist for the removal of the trees. At this time, approval has not been given. • There is lighting proposed to be located adjacent to the structure on Washington Street. Due to the close proximity of the lighting to Washington Street, I recommend that a lighting plan be submitted which will show if the lighting will cast a glare on the adjacent right of way. The main entrance to the site is located on Front Street. Front Street, due to its termination at the busy Washington Street and with its varied pavement types, is a difficult roadway for travel. The applicant's traffic study recognizes this situation, but does not provide a recommendation as to mitigation. I recommend that the applicant's traffic engineer review the entrance and its effect on Front Street and provide recommendations as to possible mitigation. The presentation for this request will be made by Arty. George Atkins. • Cl-IY OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE C to of Salem, fflassadjusvits • �;�.,, "` ,� y Platting Pearb 1999 SEP - I A 11: 22 (1@ne -$ttlem (green Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, September 2, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman • Tentative Agenda: 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes—June 3, 1999; June 17, 1999; July 1, 1999 (7:30 PM— 7:40 PM) 2. Form A—223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street (7:40 PM— 7:50 PM) 3. Form A— 100-114 Swampscott Road (7:50 PM—8:00 PM) 4. Public Hearing—Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit—PageNet, Inc. — 12 First Street (8:00 PM—8:30 PM) 5. Old/New Business (8:30 PM— 8:45 PM) This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Ftafl AV@., Tern, Mass. on SEP y � ICUU alt I I ; 2Z a,W ti CJl18p. 38 +_x.. situ of 'Stt1Pm, gassariluu##s • ' PIttttrtin$ PnxrD One �$ttlent (Breen MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: August 31, 1999 RE: Agenda—September 2, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A—223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street This plan shows the lots proposed to house the Pickering Wharf Hotel and the Eastern Bank Building. Due to purchases of land made by Pickering Wharf Realty Trust from the Pickering Wharf Condominium Association, several lot lines need to be adjusted. The lots shown on the plan meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements of the B-5 Zoning District and the plan is appropriate for the Board's signature. 2. Form A— 100-114 Swampscott Road This plan shows the subdivision of one lot into two lots. Both lots A and B meeting the minimum lot size and frontage requirements for the Industrial Zoning District. This plan is appropriate for the Board's signature. 3. Public Hearing—Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit—PageNet, Inc. — 12 First Street The proposal is to install two receive only antennas on the building located at 12 First Street (Pequot Highlands Apartment Complex). The receive only antennas will be of a maximum height of 18 feet above the roof and approximately two inches wide. The antennas are for paging systems, not for cellular phone use. The cabinets housing the equipment will be located within the building. They will not be visible from the outside of the building. There are photo simulations included in the submitted plans, which show the view of the antennas located on the rooftop. There are approximately 24 antennas currently residing on the roof of • the Pequot Highlands Apartment Complex. John Krudwig of PageNet, Inc. will be presenting the plans for your review. PB Memorandum August 31, 1999-2 • 4. Old/New Business We need to discuss a possible date for the Annual Planning Board Barbecue. Please consider several possible dates which would work and we will finalize a date and time at the meeting. We are hoping to have the barbecue in September. • • C17Y OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE C to of 'IFttlem, H�zssttrl�us��##s u Ixmtin$ nttr� 1999 JUL IS P 12: 19 One ,$ttlrm (Breen NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hod a regular meeting on Wednesday, July 28, 1999 at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman • TbW "OMM posted on 'Official BUII� �tj"9 C", Nall AV* Salem, Mass. on at I X. I q P, h� , 10 ec a=Wanoe With Chap. 39 S . s9A a 239 of M.(i.l CITY OF SALEM. MA D# Stt(Eltt� ?t5$ixli�USk`)}#$ CLERK'S OFFICE • �;,,�',� -Y- 3 �larating +�uxr� 1999 JUL 2b A 10: 42 One Salem Green Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Wednesday, July 28, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second flodr conference room at One Salem Green. *{��J 7sWesu III Walter B. Power, III Chairman Site Visit at the Proposed Pickering Wharf Hotel Site—23 Congress Street (6:30 PM— 7:30 Pkv Tentative Agenda: • 1. Form A— 160 Rear Boston Street and 81 Beaver Street (7:30 PM—7:35 PM) 2. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit - Pickering Wharf Hotel, 223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street (7:35 PM—9:00 PM) 3. Old/New Business (9:00 PM-9:10 PM) This notice posted on 'Official Bulletin Board" City Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on 7vA4 C to . 1y�9 at l0:ya 6rll. I Wwrdsrce vfittt Chap. .39 mac. 23A A 236 of M.81 • of '�$ttlem, fflttssadjusfits • ;�'. planning �30ttra (IBne Salem (Sreen MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner 6 Salem Planning Department DATE: July22, 1999 RE: Agenda—July 28, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Site Visit—Proposed Pickering Wharf Hotel—6:30 PM There will be a site visit made to the proposed Pickering Wharf Hotel site at 6:30 PM. We will meet in the Eastern Bank parking lot. 2. Form A— 160 Rear Boston Street and 81 Beaver Street This plan shows the subdivision of a small lot of 1,095 square feet from a larger lot to be combined with an abutting lot. The large lot, Lot B is the Stop and Shop supermarket. The plan proposes to subdivide off a small lot to be combined with an abutter to create additional space. This plan is appropriate for signature. 3. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit—Pickering Wharf Hotel -223-231 Derby Street,23 Congress Street The hearing for this application was opened on June 17, 1999. A traffic study was presented to the Board at the July 1, 1999 meeting. The traffic study invokes questions about the probability of traffic mitigation at the Congress Street intersection. The intersection currently functions at a Level of Service F. At this meeting, traffic mitigation and any revisions to the fagade of the building will be discussed. The applicants will be presenting new elevations which incorporate the suggestions made by the Planning Board at past meetings. I have included a draft decision in the packet for your review. • CITY OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE fit of tt1tm, Also, rl�usk�##s planning +Poarb lggq JUL I4 A f1@ne ,Salem (Srent 9` 3U NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, July 15, 1999, at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled. The next Planning Board meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 28, 1999. _The continuation of the Public Hearing for the Pickering Wharf Hotel request (213-227 Derby Street & 23 Congress Street) will be heard at the July 15, 1999 Planning Board meeting. • Walter B. Power, III Chairman Thic notice poli:; ' ;i tivard" City Hall Ave., rii � i, ?�; ..». on '1,lglgQ at 9!34 A,m_ iqcac caro noe Wfth Chap, as sec. 23A & 23B of M.G.L. • !.I Y Or 5c1LEM. NA CLUIKS OFFICE t Ctu of �5ztttem, Httssttrl�usc##s 191amting Poarb 'JUN' 29 A q: 5V (1Dne j6alem (Sreett Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, July 1, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III 63ZIN Chairman Site Visit at the Proposed Osco Site—44-60 Boston Street (7:00 PM— 7:30 PAS • Tentative Agenda: 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes—May 6, 1999 (7:30 PM—7:35 PM) 2. Form A—5 Foster Court(7:35 PM—7:50 PM) 3. Public Hearing—Form C—Definitive Subdivision Plan—Village at Vinnin Square, Phase IV, Carol Way (7:50 PM—8:20 PM) 4. Public Hearing— Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit—Sprint PCS —217-225 Essex Street (8:20 PM—9:00 PM) 5. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco.Drug Store and General Office Building - 44-60 Boston Street (9:00 PM—9:45 PM) 6. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit - Pickering Wharf Hotel, 223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street(9:45 PM— 10:30 PM) 7. Old/New Business (10:30 PM— 10:35 PM) • Thla notice posted on ^Offlcia,l Bullet. City Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on 6 ard" 2 7..54 A m 19 accordance w- C " a31q? ' ' ' 23A 238 of ht.G.L. haP• 39 Sec. C to of "itt1Pm, fflttssadjusl>##s (IDne j6xlem Oreett MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior PIanne� Salem Planning Department DATE: June 29, 1999 RE: Agenda—July 1, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Site Visit—Proposed Osco Site—7:00 PM There will be a site visit made to the.proposed Osco site at 7:00 PM. We will meet in the church parking lot. The site visit will focus on the view from the abutting Federal Street properties. 2. Form A—5 Foster Court This plan shows a subdivision on Lot D1 into two lots. Lot D2 is labeled as not a separate building lot, thus is not required to meet zoning requirements. It is proposed that Lot D2 will be combined with the lot located on Balcomb Street and owned by Pilgram Realty Trust. The additional area will be utilized for parking. The Board had previously approved a Form A plan for the lots located in this area. 3. Public Hearing—Form C—Definitive Subdivision Plan—Village at Vinnin Square, Phase IV, Carol Way The Form C subdivision plan has been submitted by Vinnin Square LLC. The plan has been created to allow the combination of Lots A, B. and D2, which comprise Phase 4 of the Village at Vinnin Square, and to redivide the lots into Lots 1 and 2. These lots are being created to reflect the relocated Carol Way, as well as the location of Building A to the right of the main entrance. The Board has previously reviewed the relocation of Carol Way through the amended site plan for the Phase IV development. The existing Carol Way does not contain any utilities, thus the roadway can be abandoned by the owners. Carol Way will • be a private drive, which will be maintained by the owners of the lot. The City is not responsible for its maintenance. I have included a draft decision in your packet. The request will be presented to the Board PB Memorandum June 29, 1999-2 by Attorney Joseph Correnti. 4. Public Hearing—Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit—Sprint PCS—217- 225 Essex Street The proposal is to construct six panel antennas on the building located at 217-225 Essex Street (Eastern Bank). The panel antennas will be of a height of 56 inches and eight inches wide. The antennas will be mounted on poles. The total height above the roof of the Eastern Bank building will be fifteen feet. The six antennas will be mounted on two poles, one pole will be mounted to the elevator penthouse and one pole will be mounted to the chimney like structure on the roof of the building. The cabinets housing the equipment will be located in the basement of the building. They will not be visible from the outside of the building. There are photo simulations included in your packet, which show the antennas located on the rooftop. Jennifer McCook from Atlantic Western Consulting will be presenting the plans for your review. 5. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street The Public Hearing for this application was opened on February 4, 1999. At the last meeting, the Board requested that a peer review be conducted on the traffic study performed by Bruce Campbell and Associates. The Planning Department selected the firm of Hayden/Wegman to conduct the peer review. After close review of the traffic study, several meetings were held between the two firms to discuss any issues with the traffic study. Hayden/Wegman has drafted a final letter for the Planning Board which states its conclusions pertaining to the review. The letter has been included in your packet. I have decided that it is not necessary for Hayden/Wegman to appear at the Planning Board meeting. I have included a draft decision in your packet for your review. 6. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit-Pickering Wharf Hotel- 223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street The hearing for this application was opened on June 17, 1999. The Planning Board requested additional information pertaining to traffic, the siting of the building, side and rear view of the structure, and any additional parking to be provided off site. The applicant will be presenting a traffic study to the Board at its July 1, 1999 meeting. • aee� Salem Planning Board �Z • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, July 1, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, July 1, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Kim Driscoll, Lee Harrington and David Weinert . Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the meeting of May 6, 1999 were presented for approval. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the minutes of the meeting of May 6, 1999 as presented, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Form A - 5 Foster Court Atty. George Atkins addressed the Board and requested approval of a Form A for 5 Foster Court. He explained that the plan shows a subdivision of lot D1 into two lots. He noted that lot D2 is labeled as not a separate building lot and is not required to meet zoning requirements. He stated that it is proposed that lot D2 will be combined with the lot located on Balcomb Street and owned by Pilgrim Realty Trust. The additional area will be used for parking. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Form A for 5 Foster Court, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Public Hearing - Form C - Definitive Subdivision Plan - Villaee at Vinnin Square - Phase IV - Carol Way Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and requested approve of this plan. He explained that the plan has been created to allow the combination of lots A, B, and D2 which comprise phase IV of the Village at Vinnin Square, and to redivide the lots into Lots 1 and 2. He explained that these lots are being created to reflect the relocated Carol Way, as well as the location of building A to the right of the main entrance. Atty. Correnti noted that the Board has previously reviewed the relocation of Carol Way through the amended site plan for the Phase IV development. He explained that Carol Way will be a private drive and will be maintained by the owners of the lot. • Page 1 • Lee Harrington questioned if the trustees were in favor this plan. Atty. Correnti noted that this plan came out of discussions with the trustees regarding their concerns about the project and they are in favor of it. David Weinert noted that there is a utility easement on the plan. Atty. Correnti explained that there would be no impact on that easement. Walter Power noted that the plan is essentially creating two new lots and nothing else has changed. He opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. A resident of 87 freedom Hollow addressed the Board and stated that she purchased her condo because of the view and she feels it would be obstructed. Larry Kindler of 27 Charter Street, noted that he is a candidate for Councillor at Large. He asked for the density per acre totals and what open space would be left on the property. Atty. Correnti stated that they could be happy to meet with Mr. Kindler and any other candidate who would like information on the project. Lee Harrington asked when the work that is do be done on the pond would take place. Atty. Correnti stated that they will file a Notice of Intent with the Conservation Commission to revitalize the pond. He explained that the Superseding Order of Conditions is being appealed and he explained that process and timetable. Walter Power read comments from other city Boards and Commissions. The Conservation Commission needs more information. The Fire Department concurs with the project. There being no further questions or comments regarding this project a motion was made by Bill Cullen to close the public hearing, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the Form C for the Village at Vinnin Square, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Page 2 • • Public Hearing - Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit - Sprint PCS - 217-225 Essex Street Margaret Franklin addressed the Board and explained their request for a Special Permit to install 6 panel antennas on the Eastern Bank Building at 217-225 Essex Street. She introduced Jennifer McCook to explain the details of the plan. Ms. McCook explained that the 6 panels would be 56 inches high and 8 inches wide and would be mounted on poles. She noted that the total height above the roof of the Eastern Bank building would be fifteen feet. She explained that the 6 antennas would be mounted on two poles, one pole mounted to the elevator penthouse and the other will be mounted to the chimney like structure on the roof of the building. She explained that the cabinets housing the equipment for the antennas would be housed in the basement of the bank and will not be visible from the outside of the building. Ms. McCook explained that this facility will be unmanned and will not affect traffic in the area. Lee Harrington asked what the purpose of the antennas would be. Ms. McCook noted that they will enhance the indoor and outdoor coverage along Essex Street and Washington Street. Bill Cullen asked when they plan to install the antennas. Ms. Franklin stated that they plan to apply for a building permit when the appeal period is up. Kim Driscoll asked if the considered using City Hall as the location for the antennas. Ms. McCook stated that she did consider City Hall and other locations in the city but there would have been a greater visual impact at those locations. Walter Power opened the hearing up to Public Comment at this time. Staley McDermott addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the locations of the antennas. He showed simulated photographs of what the views of the antennas would be. He also suggested that they have built aesthetically pleasing towers on churches in the past and showed an old photograph of the Daniel Lows building which has two towers on either side of the front of the building. He suggested that they could replicate that design to house the antennas. • Page 3 • Barbara Cleary of 104 Federal Street, a former member of the Salem Redevelopment Authority addressed the applicant and questioned if they had received approval from the SRA. Ms. McCook stated that the SRA referred them to the Planning Board. Ms. Cleary cautioned that it was her understanding that they would need design approval from the SRA. Ms. Franklin stated that she would look into that. Kim Driscoll asked if there was any availability to move the antennas around. Ms. McCook stated that the locations were chosen for optimum coverage and less visual impact in the area. Betsy Burns addressed the Board and stated that she feels that it is a shame that in historic downtown Salem we should have to have something so visible and she requested that the Board look into Mr. McDermott's suggestion. Ms. Franklin stated that she felt that it would be cost prohibitive. There being no further questions or comments at this time a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to close the public hearing, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Wireless Communications Facility Special Permit for 217-225 Essex Street - Sprint PCS, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review Special Permit - Osco Drug Store and General Office Building- 44-60 Boston Street Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and recalled that at the last meeting the Board requested a peer review to be conducted on the traffic study that was performed by Bruce Campbell and Associates. He noted that the Planning Department selected the firm of Hayden/Wegman to conduct the peer review. He stated that they have reviewed the recommendations of Hayden/Wegman and would like to address them. Atty. Correnti reviewed the recommendation of Hayden/Wegman that the developer be required to configure the drive onto Boston Street o as to preclude left turns into or out of it. He stated that they could accept that condition although they would rather have that access to the site. The second recommendation that Hayden/Wegman made was that an additional lane be constructed on the Boston Street westbound approach to the Bridge Street intersection. The length of the lane would be limited to the extent of the developers property. • Page 4 • Atty. Correnti stated that they have 1,700 s.f. of land shown on the plan which would be made available to the city at no cost. He also stated that they would do the design for the road. Kim Driscoll questioned if the developer would pay for the construction of the road. She noted that past precedent on other projects has been for developers to make a contribution to the cost. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be willing to contribute their fair share, however Osco does not feel that they should be on the hook to solve all of the traffic problems in that area when their are other factors contributing to the traffic. After some discussion Atty. Correnti stated that they would agree to the design and that cost of building the road. The third recommendation of Hayden/Wegman is to have the developers traffic engineer present travel time assessments for the post construction trips between the site drives on Bridge Street and the intersection of Boston and Essex Streets via Flint/Federal/Boston Street, Bridge and Boston Streets, Flint and Essex Street. Attp. Correnti stated that they would do that but noted that their information shows that it is not going to be faster to get to the site by going through the neighborhoods. • Walter Power suggested that he would like the developer to construct a 5 foot cast iron or balistrade galvanized fence around the full perimeter of the property Kim Driscoll stated that she would like to see more landscaping on the co of Boston and Bridge Street. Atty. Correnti stated that it is an entrance corridor and they could work that corner in the plan. Atm Qoryt--MU �NC �Y psi Vt x wc)Qv d Q'C v u.p ri� 4-V Walter Power opened the meeting up to public comment at this time. Staley McDermott addressed the Board and expressed his desire to see the tttr*mh building location moved. Atty. Correnti stated that they have explored that and significant variances would be required to do that. Dale Yale addressed the Board and requested that the Certificate of Occupancy be tied to the construction of the additional lane on Boston Street. Meg Twohey of 122 Federal Street addressed the Board and asked them to consider the conditions for the project that they have submitted to the Planning Department. Councillor At Large Tom Furey addressed the Board and urged them to . approve this project noting that the city needs the economic development. Page 5 �.�► v�a9- �'�,,� vv�.� die - • Barbara Shaw addressed the Board and stated that she is concerned about the completion of the Office Building. She suggested that the developer should be required to build the office building before the Osco Drug Store. Larry Kindler of 27 Charter Street addressed the Board and noted that Salem has a reputation of being a difficult place to start a business. There being no further questions or comments at this time, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to close the public hearing, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. The Board reviewed the conditions as requested by the Federal Street Neighborhood Association and incorporated some of them into the draft decision. The Board reviewed the draft decision and made some changes to it. Denise Sullivan will draft the final version. Motion made by Lee Harrington to grant a Site Plan Review Special Permit for an Osco Drug and General Office Building at 44-60 Boston Street, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Kim Driscoll noted to the audience that this project was not anything that • the Planning Board could deny since it is a permitted use by variances. She stated that she did not think that people understood that. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit - Pickering Wharf Hotel- 223-231 Derby Street 23 Congress Street Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and noted that the hearing was opened on June 17, 199 and the Board requested additional information pertaining to traffic, the siting of the building, a side and rear view of the structure, and any additional parking to be provided off site. He introduced the traffic engineer to review the traffic study. Kim Driscoll stated that she felt that the reconfiguration of the driveway was a positive step toward improving the intersection. The traffic consultant stated that the only recommendation that he would make would be to install a traffic signal there. Walter Power noted that a signal there would back traffic up all over town. Kim Driscoll asked that they try to come up with some suggestions for that area noting that there is heavy pedestrian traffic there. Atty. Correnti agreed and suggested that if some of the other attractions in the area would like to participate they would be willing to make a contribution. • Page 6 • Mr. Weinert asked if they were going to use the South Harbor Parking Garage. Atty. Correnti stated that they are not counting on using it but would like to work something out with the city. Kim Driscoll raised the issue of the future Hotel Conference Center, noting that even though it is not on this plan it will impact that area. Atty. Correnti stated that the traffic study took the future conference center into consideration. Hillary Rocket explained the plans for the Eastern Bank Building and the treatment for the back of the Hotel Building. Walter Power asked if they have considered the change in the location of the building on the site. Mr. Rocket stated that they have located the building on the best location on the site. He noted that the main reason for the choosing of this location is because of the future conference center. Walter Power asked where the loading docks would be located. Mr. Rocket stated that they would be in the back alley. Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. • Donald Michaud of 12 Savoy Road addressed the Board and noted that he owns the building across the street. He expressed his concern about his view after the hotel is built. Staley McDermott addressed the Board and stated that he thought that the building looked nice but suggested that the location should be on the street. There being no further questions or comments at this time, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to continue the public hearing to July 15, 1999, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. The Board discussed holding a special meeting on July 28, 1999. Denise Sullivan will check on that and get back to the Board. Page 7 • • There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB070199 • Page 8 • 04_EFKS OFFICE J�cum� One *Irnt Green 1999 JUN IS A 10: 38 Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, June 17, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. �1�ps�/ /�V►Qr 7�P" Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda: 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes—May 6, 1999 (7:30 PM—7:40 PM) • 2. Form A— 13-15 Greenway Road (7:40 PM—7:50 PM) 3. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit - Pickering Wharf Hotel, 223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street(7:50 PM—8:50 PM) 4. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review—Salem State College Assistance Corporation, 71 Loring Avenue (8:50 PM—9:50 PM) 5. Old/New Business (9:50 PM— 10:00 PM) Request for a six month extension of the Site Plan Review Approval for the Market Basket proposed on Highland Avenue This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on Ju,uF is. i99q • at /0: sa n.m. IQ accordanceewilfi Chap. 38 Sec. 23A & 238 of M.G.L. C7 to of �$alEm, passadluutts s �9 One ,ixlrm Greets MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner(� Salem Planning Department DATE: June 14, 1999 RE: Agenda—June 17, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A— 13-15 Greenway Road This plan was before the Planning Board at its May 20, 1999 meeting for a request for a waiver from frontage. The Board granted the waiver and a decision was filed. The twenty day appeal period for the decision has elapsed and there have been no appeals made. The plan before the Board for its signature at this time is the Form A plan to subdivide the land into two lots. This plan is identical to the plan presented to the Board at its May 20, 1999 meeting. The plan is appropriate for the Board's signature. 2. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit—Pickering Wharf Hotel - 223-231 Derby Street, 23 Congress Street The proposal includes the redevelopment of a two acre site, which includes the demolition of several retail buildings and the former marina building. The plans show the construction of a five-story hotel/retail building (gross floor area equals approximately 73,358 square feet) and a new single story bank building (approximately 2,262 square feet in size). The hotel includes approximately 100 rooms, including meeting rooms, with retail space located on the first floor. In addition, the plan proposes the construction of 83 parking spaces on site. There is a hotel conference center and marina shown on the plan for future development. This building is not included in the Wetlands Special Permit or Site Plan Review requests before the Board at this time. The parcel is located in the Central Business (B-5) Zoning District. All of the dimensional • requirements as set forth in the B-5 Zoning District are met with the proposal. There is no parking required in this Zoning District, thus the parking as shown on the plan meets the City's requirements. This project does not require a filing with the Zoning Board of Appeals because all of the dimensional requirements have been met and the hotel/retail use is a `V PB Memorandum June 14, 1999-2 • permitted use in the B-5 Zoning District. This project does require the filing of a Notice of Intent before the Conservation Commission, but at this time no filing has been made. Attorney Joseph Correnti will present the plans to the Planning Board. 3. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review—Salem State College Assistance Corporation, 71 Loring Avenue The proposal before the Board includes the leasing of two spaces within Building #4 of the Salem State Planned Unit Development. The Salem State College Assistance Corporation received approval from the Planning Board on February 5, 1999 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) at the site, which is located predominately in the Industrial Zoning District. The decision is included in your packet. The PUD decision requires that any use in the PUD containing over 10,000 square feet will be required to submit an application to the Planning Board under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Salem State College Assistance Corporation is requesting two Site Plan Reviews for two uses proposed to be located in Building#4 (71 Loring Avenue) in the PUD. The first use proposed is Gold's Gym, this use will consist of approximately 20,200 square feet of space within Building#4. The second use is Rose Displays, Inc,this use will consist of • approximately 13,750 square feet of space within Building #4. Both of these uses are allowed uses within the PUD decision. There is no additional building construction associated with this Site Plan Review request. Both of the uses are proposed to be housed within an existing building. There is parking currently located on the site. Attorney George Atkins will present the plans the Planning Board. 4. Old/New Business The applicant for the Market Basket proposed to be located on Highland Avenue is requesting that the Board approve a time extension for the Site Plan Review approval. The applicant is requesting an additional six months to begin site work. • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, June 17, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, June 17, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Carter Vinson, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Kim Driscoll and Lee Harrington. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the meeting of May 6, 1999 were presented for approval. Walter Power suggested that the Board approve them at the next meeting so that he can review them. Form A - 13-15 Greenway Road Attorney Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and requested approval of a Form A for 13-15 Greenway Road. He explained that this plan was before the Planning Board on May 20, 1999 for a request for a Waiver from • Frontage. The Board granted the waiver and a decision was filed. He noted that the twenty day appeal period has ended and they are requesting the Form A to subdivide the land into two lots. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Form A for 13-15 Greenway Road, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Public Hearing - Site Plan Review and Wetlands Special Permit - Pickering Wharf Hotel - 223-231 Derby Street/ 23 Congress Street Chairman Walter Power opened the meeting by reading comments from other city Boards and Commissions. The Fire Department made some comments and Atty. Correnti noted that they will review the plan again. The Conservation Commission needs more information and they will be required to file a Notice of Intent with them. • Page 1 • The Board of Health will hear the request on July 13, 1999 at 8:00 p.m. Several letters from community leaders were read in support of the project from Annie Harris of the Salem Partnership, Dan Monroe of the Peabody Essex Museum and Elen DiGeronimo of the Salem Chamber of Commerce. Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and explained that this a reuse of an existing site and the plans call for the construction of a five story hotel and retail building of approximately 73,358 s.f. and a new single story bank building of approximately 2,262 s.f. He explained that the Rocket family intends to revitalize the Pickering Wharf area and bring new life to the area. He predicted that the area has dynamic potential and would be the corner stone of the downtown. He also noted that the Rockets have worked closely with the tenants at Pickering Wharf on the new site plan and the plans have been shown to the neighbors and 90% of the condo owners have voted to support the plan. Atty. Correnti explained that the hotel includes approximately 100 rooms including meeting rooms, a breakfast pub, fitness center and retail space located on the first floor. In addition the plan calls for 83 parking spaces on the site. He noted that there is no parking requirement in this zoning district. He noted that they filed a Notice of Intent with the Conservation • Commission today and they will be meeting with them on July 8, 1999. Carter Vinson noted that the plan indicates that the Hotel will be a Best Western. Atty. Correnti stated that they will be using the Best Western Reservation System but the hotel will be locally owned and operated. Kim Driscoll asked if the plan needed SRA or Historical Commission approvals. Atty. Correnti stated that they did not need to go before those Boards. Atty. Correnti introduced Scott Petrowicz to explain the plan to the Board. Mr. Petrowicz explained the plan and noted that they are reusing an existing site and would be demolishing the Hawthorne Building and the Derby Building as well as the existing Eastern Bank Building. He noted that there is a hotel conference center and marina shown on the plan for future development and is not included in this application. Mr. Petrowicz reviewed the site plan and noted that they hope to keep 4 trees on the site and plant 4 new trees along the street. He reviewed the landscape plan with the Board. • Page 2 • Mr. Petrowicz also noted that they are planning to eliminate 2 existing curb cuts in an attempt to make the intersection of Congress and Derby Streets safer. Mr. Petrowicz reviewed the drainage plan for the project. He noted that they will be installing additional catch basins with drainage hoods and grease separators. He noted that there would be no change in the existing drainage except for the addition of the drainage hoods. Mr. Petrowicz explained the plan and the location for the new Eastern Bank Building. He noted that it would have a drive through and the utilities would be from Congress Street. He noted that since this is the reuse of an existing commercial site, everything already exists on the site and they would be making improvements. Gene Collins questioned whether the Fire Department and the City Engineer have looked at the drainage calculations. Mr. Petrowicz stated that the City Engineer has looked at the plans and has been a tremendous help in locating the lines etc. He noted that they would be upgrading many of the utilities on the site. • Carter Vinson asked what the projected building time would be for the project. Mike Rocket stated that they would hope to get started in the fall and would like to be finished and open by the spring. He noted that they would coordinate their construction activity during the month of October when the tourist season is heaviest in that area. Robert Shakelton the Architect for the project explained the elevations of the buildings. Lee Harrington asked if the plan called for restaurant space in the hotel. Mr. Rocket stated that the would be restaurant space in the retail area but not)( IN the hotel itself. Atty. Correnti explained that there is some interest by existing tenants to remain in the area and they would be working with them to relocate them during construction. Lee Harrington questioned if they have an agreement for use of the South Harbor Parking Garage. Atty. Correnti stated that the use of the parking garage would be beneficial to them, but there is no agreement in place at this time. Eastern Bank Vice President Thomas Chew addressed the Board and stated that the bank is excited about the new building and the hotel project. • Page 3 • Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. Mary Wilbur of 7 Cedar Street addressed the Board and questioned the parking for the new bank and ATM access. Mr. Chew stated that there would be ample parking and easy access to the ATM. Tom Cheevor a resident of Pickering Wharf addressed the Board and stated that while he is not opposed to the hotel he has some concerns about the ownership of the wharf. He stated that the Rockets own a percentage of Pickering Wharf. Louise Skerry of 222-224 Derby Street addressed the Board and stated that she is opposed to the hotel because it would block her view of the ocean. Mike Skerry of 222-224 Derby Street addressed the Board and asked that the building be moved back from the street. Larry Kindler of 27 Charter Street addressed the Board and stated that he is a candidate for Councillor at Large. He voiced his opinions about the process. Phil Pelletier addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about height requirements for the buildings. Ward One Councillor Peter Paskowski addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the project. He noted that he has concerns about the Tax Increment Financing Plan that the Mayor has proposed. Walter Power noted that the TIF package is not in the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. Kim Driscoll stated that she would like to see the interior lighting on the site be similar or the same as the lighting that is on Derby Street. Carter Vinson requested that they provide information on the trash removal at the next meeting. r rez!� Walter Power addressed the de loper and stated that he has concerns about the siting of the building. He st ted that he would like them to consider moving the building closer to t d street, noting that the Hawthorne Hotel is right at the street and it would make an improvement to the street scape. Bill Cullen stated that he felt it would be a problem to move the building. Carter Vinson stated that he has some concerns about the siting of the building and asked that the Board have a discussion about it at the next meeting. • Page 4 • Kim Driscoll addressed the Board and stated that it is a joy to review a plan for the hotel and noted that there has been a lot of good comments made about the project tonight. There being no further questions or comments at this time a motion was made by Bill Cullen to continue the public hearing to July 1, 1999, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Public Hearing - Salem State College Assistance Corporation - 71 Loring Ave Atty. George Atkins addressed the Board and explained that they are seeking approval of the leasing of two spaces within Building#4 of the Salem State College Planned Unit Development. He recalled that the Board approved the PUD on February 5, 1999 and the decision requires that any use in the PUD containing over 10,000 s.f. will be required to submit an application to the Planning Board for Site Plan Review. Atty. Atkins explained that they are requesting two Site Plan Reviews for two uses proposed in building#4 in the PUD. The first use proposed is Gold's Gym which will consist of approximately 20,200 s.f. of space and the second use is for Rose Displays, Inc. which will use approximately 13.750 s.f. Atty. Atkins noted that both of these uses are allowed uses within the PUD decision. He also noted that there is no additional building construction associated with this plan as both of the uses proposed are to be housed within an existing building. Atty. Atkins suggested that the two uses are a good fit for the site. Atty. Atkins presented a Parking Demand Estimate and traffic projections from the month of April 1999. He also noted that Rose Displays would have 5 employees in the warehouse and 20 office staff. Atty. Atkins requested that the Board take prompt action on the request since their prospective tenants have lease considerations and moving preparation to attend to. Walter Power asked for questions and comments from the Planning Board members. Lee Harrington questioned how long the lease would be for. Wayne Corley stated that the lease for Gold's Gym would be a 10 year lease with 2 five year options to renew, and Rose Displays would be a 5 year lease with a 5 year option to renew. • Page 5 • Carter Vinson asked if they would have separate men's and woman's locker rooms. Mr. Corley explained that they would have separate facilities for men and women and there is a study being done now on improvements to the plumbing and water and sewer upgrades. l Kim Driscoll stated that we are at a point in Salem where we can never say no to development. She noted however that she was under the impression that Salem State would be looking to attract businesses such as Biotech Firms and Software Company's and questioned why they are relocating existing businesses. Walter Power agreed and stated that he felt that they would be looking to attract businesses that would be geared towards student involvement from the college. Atty. Atkins stated that they are still looking for those kinds of businesses for the other spaces at the site. Wayne Corley explained the process of how they came to have Gold's Gym as a tenant and noted that a fitness center is an amenity in a business park. He noted that he sees these two tenants as the anchors for the project. Mr. Corley stated that there would be internship opportunities for the Sports and Leisure students with Gold's Gym as well as Rose's Display where there would be opportunities in sales and distribution. Mr. Corley reported that they are interested in considering Internet related businesses. He also noted that they have turned interested businesses away and are selective in the companies that they consider. Kim Driscoll asked what the status of the PILOT Taxes were. Atty. Atkins stated that they have an agreement and they are waiting to hear from the city on that. He noted that every lease will contain pass through taxes to the city. Wayne Corley explained that they use a complex formula developed by the city assessor to figure the taxes. Kim Driscoll asked if there were any plans for the interior traffic circulation on the site. Mr. Corley stated that they would be looking to have a good now on the site and noted that as landlords the tenants would expect that. Carter Vinson suggested that the Planning Board put together a process for reviewing this site since they are required to come before the Board on a regular basis. He noted that there is no need to review the whole plan every time they come in. Chuck Puleo noted that the PUD called for the traffic on Loring Avenue to be addressed at some point regarding traffic improvements. Atty. Atkins agreed and noted that this use may not impact traffic at this time and at some point they will be addressing that. • Page 6 • Kim Driscoll suggested that the Planning Board should agree to a point where the site is occupied for example 60% and have the applicant talk to the Board about the traffic at that time. She noted that any use of the site is going to impact traffic in that area and SSC should work to do the best they can. Atty. Atkins noted that other factors in the area contribute to the Loring Avenue traffic problems and SSC has limited funds. Carter Vinson suggested that it would be helpful if Salem State would decide what the full build out of the site will be. Atty. Atkins stated that from a legal stand point the Board can ask them to address the traffic whenever they so choose. He stressed however that he feels that the Board is making demands on SSC that are not required of any shopping mall developer. Lee Harrington agreed noting that we are dealing with a portion of a State College and not a private developer. Walter Power opened the meeting up to public comment at this time. Mary Wilbur of 7 Cedar Street addressed the Board and expressed her concern about the traffic from Gold's Gym and the times that they would be coming and going from the site. There being no further questions or comments at this time, a motion was made by Gene Collins to close the public hearing, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to approve the Site Plan Review with the standard conditions that are appropriate, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Request for Six Month Extension for SPR Approval for the Market Basket proposed on Highland Avenue Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and asked for a 6 month extension on the Market Basket approval. Bill Cullen moved to extend the approval for the Market Basket project for 6 months, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. • Page 7 • The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB061799 • Page 8 • Lr 11, MA - gI#y 0# �ttlem, ttssttrl�usk`##8 I-IN Plarming ultra „� t999 JU�I -2 A it� 40 Otte Salem Greett Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, June 3, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. 7y Walter B. Power, III Chairman Discussion Prior to Planning Board Meeting—Best Management Practices Concerning Drainage (7:00 PM— 7:30 PM) CANCELLED • Tentative Agenda: 1. Continuation of Public Hearing— Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building -44-60 Boston Street(7:30 PM—8:30 PM) 2. Old/New Business (8:30 PM—9:00 PM) Update from Salem State College Assistance Corporation on their Planned Unit Development Special Permit Tbb n0lw P0418d an 'Official Bulletin Board" C11p .call Ava., Salem, Mass. on JUN 2 000 A I �l 0 a p� aonotbanoe wilts Chap. 39� . 1�A A !!M N i1.G.l n ' L� ai#u of "ittlem, Ansoadj utas ID• Planning PuxrD (])no Satem Green MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: June 1, 1999 RE: Agenda—June 3, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street The applicant will be requesting to continue the Public Hearing until June 17, 1999 2. Old/New Business Update from Salem State College Assistance Corporation on their Planned Unit Development Special Permit: Atty. George Atkins will be presenting to the Board an update on Salem State College Assistance Corporation's PUD special permit. There have been some developments made to the site, and Salem State would like to speak to the Board concerning those developments • 7/13/99 at 10:59 AM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 1 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, June 3, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, June 3, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, and Lee Harrington. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Cleric. Informal Discussion with Salem State College Assistance Corporation Atty. George Atkins and Wayne Curley, Executive Director of the Salem State College Assistance Corporation were present at the meeting to give the Planning Board an update on the progress of the development. Mr. Corley reviewed the list of tenants that they have leases with to date and noted that they will be coming in for site plan review for Gold's Gym and Rose Displays as required by the PUD. He stated that they would be in with that presentation at the next meeting. • Mr. Corley explained the process by which they select tenants for the site and noted that they try to get tenants that would have synergy with each other. Board members were given an Opportunity to ask questions about the site. Walter Power expressed concern about the additional traffic that would be in the area with the proposed Gold's Gym. Atty. Atkins stated that they would present that information during SPR. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted ^by: Eile n M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB052099 f OF SALEM. MA C s to of ialem, f ttssurlluskc##s�'cnK's OFFICE • s s 151amiin$ Paan) Mne Salem Sreert 1999 14AY I l P 3: 4b Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, May 20, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second flooriconference room at One Salem Green. TY &qalv � Walter B. Power, III (� ) Chairman Tentative Agenda 1. Approval of Meeting Minutes—April 1, 1999, April 15, 1999, and April 22, 1999 (7:30 PM • —7:45 PM) 2. Public Hearing—Waiver From Frontage— 13-15 Greenway Road (7:45 PM— 8:15 PM) 3. Amendment To Site Plan—Village at Vinuin Square, Phase IV (8:15 PM—9:00 PM) 4. Old/New Business (9:00 PM—9:15 PM) This not'" posted on "Official Bulletin Boar" au City Hall .., Sal©m, Mass. on -7ngy i7 yy �?:q1. pm .., ieaccordaizce Witn C 23A i 238 of M.G.L. gyp. 39 See. • C to of tt1Pm, Httss�Irl�usk�##s s • ;a�. Planning Foam Orm Salem Green MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: May 17, 1999 RE: Agenda—May 20, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Public Hearing—Waiver From Frontage— 13-15 Greenway Road: The applicant is requesting a waiver from frontage for the parcels located at 13-15 Greenway Road. The plans shows two lots. One lot (Lot 59) is proposed to contain 50 feet of frontage and 7,000 square feet of total lot size. The second lot(Lot 60 and 60A) is proposed to contain 95 feet of frontage and approximately 12,000 square feet of total lot size. Lot 59 has historically been a separate lot, but because all three lots are owned by the same owner, the lots have merged. This will retain what has historically been a non-conforming lot. Arty. Joseph Correnti will be presenting the request to the Board. 2. Amendment to Site Plan—Village at Vinnin Square,Phase IV The Planning Board approved the site plan for the Village at Vinnin Square, Phase IV at their February5, 1997 meeting. The decision from that approval is included in the packet. Several neighbors appealed the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The applicant is requesting to amend the site plan approval due to negotiations made with the abutters. The original decision included three structures, which housed 178 units, with associated parking. This plan shows two structures and several townhouse units, which total 130 units on the site, with associated parking. The plan is less intense than that plan originally approved by the Planning Board, thus requires only an amendment to the site plan. I have included a draft amended decision in your packet for your review. • Atty. Joe Correnti will be presenting the plans to the Board. �.� C11TY OF SM"LEM. MA bf latent, Mass djus0to CLERIC'S OFFICE 1999 MAY - P One �tt[em (1J�reett 3 2 49 Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, May 6, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. 4�5,1tJB `�s�r�X Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda • 1. Form A—Clark Avenue - Lots #2A, 3B, and 4B (7:30 PM—7:40 PM) 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building -44-60 Boston Street (7:40 PM—8:45 PM) 3. Old/New Business (8:45 PM—9:00 PM) Clerk of the Works Fee This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall Ave., Salam, Mass. on Nj s, ;v5q at d��19 Am is accordance with Chap. 39 Sec. 23A 93B of M.G.L. Ctu a# 'SaIrm, fflassarlluutts Planting Pnara One �Metn Green MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Plannel"S Salem Planning Department DATE: May 3, 1999 RE: Agenda—May 6, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A—Clark Avenue—Lots #2A,3B, and 4B: The Form A submitted to the Planning Board is a Land Court Plan. The Clark Avenue subdivision was approved by the Planning Board several years ago. The approved subdivision plan includes registered and non- registered land. The Form A plan before the Board allows the registered land and the non- registered land to be sold. This will allow each lot to meet the minimum lot size requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The original approved subdivision plan called for this action to happen. This plan is appropriate for the Board's signature. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for this project on February 4, 1999. There were many residents in attendance. The residents expressed their concerns with traffic, drainage, and the location of the entrances on the site. The Board's discussion focussed on traffic and drainage on the site. In particular, the Board requested that the applicant look into the flood elevations on the site and the possibility of drainage exiting the site to the abutting parcels. In addition, the Board requested the applicant look into improvements for the Boston Street/Bridge Street intersection. The request was last before the Board at your April 22, 1999 meeting. At that meeting, the applicant presented a noise study, a lighting plan, and elevations of the structures. The Board discussed traffic in the area and the effects of a left turn exit onto Boston Street • r PB Memorandum April 20, 1999-2 • I have included a draft decision in your packet for your review. 3. Old/New Business Fee for Clerk of the Works: Currently, the developers are charged a fee of$20.00 per hour for the Clerk of the Works. This fee has not been increased in approximately seven years. The Clerk's salary is in excess on $20.00 per hour. I am proposing that the Board vote to increase the Clerk's fee to $27.00 per hour. The increase in the Clerk's fee only requires a vote of the Planning Board to be put into effect. • • . 5/15199 at 9:36 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 2 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, May 6, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, May 6, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter Vinson; Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, and Lee Harrington. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Form A - Clark Avenue Lots 2A- 3B. and 4B Mr. Connick addressed the Board and explained that the Form A he is requesting is a Land Court Plan. He explained that the Clark Avenue subdivision was approved by the Planning Board several years ago and the approved plan shows registered and unregistered land. This Form A before the board will allow the registered land and the non registered land to be sold and each lot will meet the minimum lot size requirements of zoning. This action is also a condition of the approved subdivision plan. • Motion made by Lee Harrington approve the Form A for Clark Avenue Lots 2A, 3B, and 4B, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearine - Proposed Osco Drug Store and General Office Building Attorney Joseph Correnti addressed the Planning Board and noted that this is the 4th hearing that has been held on the project. He recalled that at the last meeting the consultants were present to answer questions regarding the traffic, lighting, and drainage and they have no new information to offer this evening, but would entertain questions from the Board. Bill Cullen questioned if they still plan to leave the curb cut in the proposed location., or move as recommended by the Planning Board. Atty. Correnti stated that they understand the Boards concerns and if they feel that it would be a proper condition they would deal with it. Walter Power noted that the Board requested that they move the curb cut further east and it can be clone as there is 12 feet there. Bill Cullen noted that he was on Boston Street earlier and the traffic was cued back to Federal Street and he doesn't think that moving the curb cut will make any difference. • 5/16»99 at 9:37 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 3 • Page 1 The Board discussed the possibility of a new right lane to turn right on to Boston Street. Walter Power noted that the developer would have to grant an easement for the third lane. David Hart noted that traffic will always be an issue with two left turns; one on Boston and one on Bridge Street. He suggested that the Board get an independent opinion from a traffic engineer to get some guidance on this matter. Walter Power asked where the funds for such a study would come from. David Hart suggested that the developer could pay for and if not then the city should come up with some funds to support the Board. He noted that; that from an environmental aspect this is a complex issue and the Board needs a consultant for that as well. Denise Sullivan noted that there are no city funds available for these studies. David Hart stated that the city would be derelict in its responsibilities if they did not support the Planning Board on this. Atty. Correnti noted that they have given the Board reports with professional opinions and apparently the Board is not; satisfied. He questioned if they were looking for all new studies or a peer review of the studies that they have • submitted. David Hart stated that they have heard the opinions that they have submitted and he would like more information from and independent third party. He also noted that the Board has clone this in the past. He also noted that he is concerned that if you can't take a left turn onto Boston Street that is going to force the traffic into the neighborhoods. Atty. Correnti addressed the matter of the environmental concerns of the Board and suggested that if they tell them what their concerns are they would try to answer then again. David Hart stated that he would like an independent opinion on the flood plain; noting that it is the same flood plain that Allied Lumber was located in and there were concerns at the time they did their renovations. He also noted that the residents have raised concerns about the possible contamination on the site. Atty. Correnti stated that there will be an Activities and Use Limitation (AUL) and that is being issued to the owner of the property Osram and they have no control over that as they do not own the property yet. David Henney of Osco Drug addressed the Board and stated that DEP has reviewed this plan and they have indicated that this site plan should work with the restrictions that they will impose in the AUL. • 5/18f99 at 9:38 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 4 • David Hart again noted his concern that the Board needs professional input to review the traffic plan. Page 3 Atty. Correnti noted that the state is supposed to be doing work in that area and there was money earmarked for a traffic study in the Stop & Shop mitigation money that the city received. Walter Power stated that it is incumbent on the Planning Board to see that the proposal is in the best interest of the neighborhood. He also noted that the developers study does not necessarily address the issues tbat are of concern to the city. Atty. Correnti noted that the corner of Boston and Bridge is underdeveloped and suggested that if they cut the corner and open it up they may get a lane in there. He suggested that they could leave that area untouched for the future development of that lane. Carter Vinson stated that he would like to see a review of the studies and mitigate the traffic. He stated he felt that it would be poor action of the Board if they did not follow through on this. • Atty. Correnti noted that they have already agreed that they would take a condition on the left turn. He noted that they want to cooperate but they need to know what they are being asked to do. David Hart suggested that the Planning Department should get quotes on what a peer review would cost. Chuck Puleo addressed the Board and reminded them of the Walgreens plan and the Proctor Street issue. He questioned how realistic it is to design traffic improvements when you don't know what is going to happen on the other side. Walter Power expressed his views and opinions regarding the traffic and the cueing on Boston Street. He stressed the need for a turning lane. Atty. Correnti stated that they would Agree to fund a peer review of their traffic study. The Board discussed the areas of concern that they would have the consultant review. It was suggested that the consultant look at the plan both ways; that being as if Proctor Street becomes a two way or it remains as is. • 5/16!99 at 9:39 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 5 • Mr. Henney from Osco Drug addressed the Board and stated be is concerned about the timeliness of the review. He stated that he would like to have this done before the nest meeting. Page 3 Atty. Correnti noted that with regards to the environmental concerns they are tiling a Determination of Applicability with the Conservation Commis§ion. David Hart stated that if there is an environmental hot spot on that site he wants to know where it is. Atty. Correnti again reiterated that this is an issue that should be addressed with the owners of the property. He also noted that the city is involved in that process and there are reports that have been sent to them. Atty. Correnti also noted that they have investigated all of the environmental issues on the site and found it to be manageable. He noted that the site that has the real issues it the one across the street where Walgreens is building, noting that they spent $100,000 investigating it and dropped the project. Bill Cullen noted that the Board received a letter from Mr. Jeffery Brant on • the environmental issues and he suggested conditions. Atty. Correnti noted that he had not seen that letter, but noted that Mr. Brant should address is concerns with Osram. After reviewing the letter, Atty. Correnti stated that there is nothing that they could agree to that would be more stringent than the state requirements for the site. He also noted that that he was certain that those suggested conditions are not it the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. He noted that DEP takes a long time on these cases and they are very thorough. Denise Sullivan suggested that she could try to see if she can get some information on the site from DEP. The Board reviewed a letter from Meg Twohey and Betsy Burns. Co-chairs of the Federal Street Neighborhood Association. Carter Vinson stated that he would like some input from the Historic Commission and suggested that they be invited to give a 15 minute presentation at the nest meeting. Walter Power asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak on the matter. • 5110/99 at 9:40 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 6 • Meg Twohey addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting they asked for the specific locations of the hot spots on the site. She noted that it would be helpful to them to !mow cohere they are. She also requested that the Board consider increasing the size of the buffer zone. Jeffery Brant addressed the Board and questioned why the developer cannot identity the hot spots. Atty. Correnti stated that DEP regulates that and Page 4 the developer has no control over that. He also noted that the city has all of the reports related to the AUL, and the developer does not bave,tbem. Walter Power noted that the developer has agreed to a peer review of the traffic study and the board discussed dates to continue the hear to. There being no further discussion on the matter at this time a motion was made by Carter Vinson to continue the Public Hearing to June 3, 1999. A site visit will be held on May 24,. 1999 at 6:30 p.m. Discussion on Increasing the Charge for the Cleric of the Works Denise Sullivan addressed the Board and explained that it has been seven • years since the Board has increased the charge to the developers for the services of the Clerk of the Works. She noted that the Clerks salary is in excess of the charge and recommended increasing the charge to $27.00 per hour. Lee Harrington suggested raising the charge to $30.00 per hour. Denise Sullivan noted that she had checked with some of the developers and they have no problem with the increase in the charge. Motion made by Lee Harrington to increase the charge for the Clerk of the Works to $30.00 per hour, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen A Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board . PB050699 .n,cawrt�. Vcli S i CE • ,, .,. 1 �laritt[rig �Dttril J�c1 Mm Salem (merit /9Q9 n�9 I6 q /1 SS NOTICE OF MEETING You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hod a regular meeting on Thursday, April 22, 1999 at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman • This nolies posted on -official Bulletin Board" City Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. o•v;.< �r at n1 � � 31t .^Wrdan' a3A�41'JAPOf ri.5.'_ n F 1A11. M ~x ub . (7 itU Of �UICM' tt�sttrl�us>� fSLERK S OFFICE a 3, 1.� -..f F ��FIYtYtiT[� �IIMSII • ',J�CC.Q!1C Orm '�$alem (great 1999 APA 21 A 9: 35 Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, April 22, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. V" es�r Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda 1. Form A— 15-17 and 17R Boston Street (7:30 PM—7:40 PM) • 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building - 44-60 Boston Street (7:40 PM—8:45 PM) 3. Old/New Business (8:45 PM—9:00 PM) This notice poste,3 on "Official Bulle 'n board" City Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on �„�gy at 4:,ss A.rh . tp acxorderm with CtV. 39 Seo. 23A A 298 of bi.G.L. • ofStt#em, Htt�sttrl�usk�##s J�COpNE One %lem Ureett MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: April 20, 1999 RE: Agenda—April 22, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A— 15-17 and 17R Boston Street: This Form A was brought before the Board at its April 15, 1999 meeting. The plan shows a lot;which contains two residential structures, which were in existence prior to the City's Subdivision Control Law. Our Subdivision Control Law states that the separation of a lot with two residential structures on it into two lots is not considered a subdivision if the two structures were in existence prior to Subdivision Control. At the April 15, 1999 meeting, the Board determined that this plan was appropriate for approval, but it was not appropriate to sign the plan until the Zoning Board of Appeals met on the applicant's request for setback variances. The applicant is scheduled to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals on April,21, 1999. At the Board's April 22, 1999 meeting, I will inform the Board as to the status of the applicant's request. If the applicant's request is approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals, it will be appropriate for the Board to sign the Form A plan. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for this project on February 4, 1999. There were many residents in attendance. The residents expressed their concerns with traffic, drainage, and the location of the entrances on the site. The Board's discussion focussed on traffic and drainage on the site. In particular, the Board requested that the applicant look into the flood elevations on the site and the possibility of drainage exiting the site to the abutting parcels. In addition, the Board requested the applicant look into improvements for the • Boston Street/Bridge Street intersection. Oki PB Memorandum April 20, 1999-2 • The request was last before the Board at your March 18, 1999 meeting. At that meeting, the applicant was asked to look into the possibility of a deceleration lane on Boston Street and eliminating the Bridge Street entrance (near the corner of Bridge Street and Boston Street) and the Boston Street entrance. In addition, the Board requested that the applicant provide you with a cross section of the entrances for the Walgreen's site. A resident provided the Board with a letter pertaining to the environmental concerns located on the site. The applicant has provided the Board with a letter, which speaks in response to those concerns. The letter is provided in your packet. In addition, the Board discussed a concept plan, which was developed by the Planning Department and showed possible development for the old Sylvania site (the same site proposed for the Osco Drug). The applicant stated at the meeting that they would look into the possibility of revising the plans as shown on the concept plan. The applicant will discuss this issue at the April 22, 1999 meeting. 3. Old/New Business I will be bringing the Board the plans for the First Street Cluster Subdivision for signature. A covenant has been drafted and reviewed by the Assistant City Solicitor. The plans and the covenant are appropriate for signature. • Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, April 22, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, April 22, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Kim Driscoll , John Moustakis and Lee Harrington. Also present were City Planner Craig Wheeler, Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Continuation of Public Hearing- Site Plan Special Permit- Osco Drug StorePermit- Osco Dru Store and General Office Building - 44-60 Boston Street City Planner Craig Wheeler addressed the Board and reviewed a schematic plan of the Boston/Bridge Street area. He stressed that this is a conceptual analysis and is illustrative of the thinking of the Administration. He explained that the intent was to look at the roadway systems with regards to potential development and this area is the first of many areas of the city that they plan to look at. Mr. Wheeler stressed that this is a conceptual plan and has not been endorsed by the Mayor or the City Council or the Planning • Board. Mr. Wheeler discussed the Osco site with regards to the conceptual plan and explained that they had requested that they combine the buildings and if not they requested that Osco move the building forward to be more in line with the street scape. He noted that Osco has made some efforts and the plan that is before the Board is for site plan review. He cautioned against using the conceptual plan when considering the approval of the project. He noted that the plan has been changed somewhat in that one curb cut has been eliminated on Bridge Street and a curb cut has been moved on Boston Street. Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and noted that this is not an amended filing. He explained that in response to the City Planners request they looked at different configurations of the project on the property. He showed a color mark up of the plan that indicated the request of the Planning Department and noted that this rendering does not take legal considerations into account such as the 50 foot setback that is required. He stated that they are not proposing this plan, while it has some architectural appeal with regards to the street scape it would require numerous variance. Page 1 Atty. Correnti introduced Brion Koning of Cavanaugh Tocci Associates to • review the noise study that was done March 3, 1999 - March 8, 1999. He explained the process by which the study was performed. He noted that the HVAC units and the rooftop units on the office building should be quiet sloe speed condensers, and noise barriers must be built to sheild sound produced by the units and the condensers. Mr. Xining noted that the system that they have recommended that will have little impact on the neighborhood, noting that sound levels at the nearest residences will not exceed existing average lowest background sound levels by more than 3 dBA, and noise produced by vehicle traffic will not be significant and will be consistent with other vehicle activities in the neighborhood and on other adjoining commercial properties. Jeff Brant of 3 Lynn Street addressed the Board and asked if the applicant has assessed the noise level from the proposed drive-up window. Mr. Koning stated that the traffic from the drive up window would be significantly lower that the existing ambient levels and the proposed office building will provide a shield. Rita Markunas of 192 Federal Street addressed the Board and expressed her concern about the wind being taken into consideration when considering noise levels. Mr. Koning noted that climate has a logical effect, and could be a significant factor at a distance of beyond 500 feet. Bill Cullen suggested • that landscaping such as arborvitae would buffer the sound. Mr. Koning stated the vegetation is not a great source of noise reduction. David Hart noted that it is anticipated that all of the Osco equipment could be on at anytime. Mr. Koning explained that day time is considered to be 7:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. and nighttime is considered 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. David Hart recommended that they verify that with the as built plans. Atty. Correnti stated that this report is a baseline report and a post construction survey could be done. Atty. Correnti introduced Bonnie Polin from Bruce Campbell and associates to review the traffic issues. Ms. Polin addressed the Board and stated that at the last meeting she was asked to look at the effects of closing one of the curb cuts on Boston Street. She noted that after they looked at the site again they found that it is possible to relocate the driveway further east so as to remove the potential conflict, however they don't believe that this is an actual conflict. She explained that during peak PM hours 274 vehicles are projected to be generated by the site (100 entering and 174 exiting). • Page 2 She explained that with improved signal timing at the Boston/Bridge Street • intersection, as recommended in the traffic study, the delays on the site drive will be somewhat decreased. Bill Cullen stated that he is concerned about the curb cut on Boston Street and suggested a right turn in only and a right turn out. John Moustakis suggested that eliminating the curb cut would limit the choice for vehicular circulation throughout the site. Paul Kondstat of Federal Street addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the impact of the circulation of the traffic on the site with the regards to the residents. Betsy Burns of 22 Beckford Street addressed the Board and expressed her concerns about the traffic from Bridge Street using Flint Street and the impact on the residents. Darrow Lebovici of 122 Federal Street addressed the Board and suggested that perhaps Flint Street could be made a one-way. Walter Power explained that the matter would have to be taken up by the City Council. • The lighting plan was reviewed with the Board and it was noted that the lighting is distributed evenly throughout the site. A discussion was held on the height of the poles and it was noted that if they reduce the height of the poles they would need more fixtures. Meg Twohey of 122 Federal Street addressed the Board and asked to have the lighting clarified. She asked if the lighting would be historical in design to agree with the neighborhood. She also questioned why the length of the poles could not be lowered. Paul Kondstat of 178 Federal Street addressed the Board and expressed his concern that the height of the poles would have an impact on the back yards on Federal Street. Atty. Correnti stated that it would not be a problem because they would take a condition that says that there will be no light intruding on the residents. • Page 3 A discussion was held on the drainage of the site. Walter Power noted that • there is a culvert that comes across the site. Atty. Correnti stated that it has been reviewed by the City Engineer and he didn't see a problem with it. He explained that the City Engineer will inspect it during construction and if it needs to be repaired they will be required to fix it. He also noted that the present drainage on the site is inoperable and their plan will greatly improve it. Kim Driscoll asked Atty. Correnti if they were opposed to relocating the building as suggested by the Planning Department. Atty. Correnti stated that the present zoning ordinance does not allow for what they are asking and they would have to refile and get numerous variances to make that work. Kim Driscoll asked if Osco would be willing to look at pulling the building closer to Boston Street to give a better site line. David Henry of Osco Drug addressed the Board and stated that if they were to move the building there would be excess dead space. Rita Markunas addressed the Board and stated that the proposed location for the building is ideal for the residents and she asked that the Board consider the quality of life for the neighbors. Jeff Brant of 3 Lynn Street addressed the Board and requested that the • developer identify the contaminated spots on the site as they have use limitations imposed by the state and they should know where they are before the build. He also asked if they plan to pave over them. Atty. Correnti stated that the site would be monitored during construction and there is no evidence of heavy contamination on the site. He also noted that all regulations would be followed strictly. There being no further discussion on the matter this evening a motion was made by Bill Cullen to continue the Public Hearing to May 6, 1999, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously. Form A - 15, 17, and 17R Boston Street Denise Sullivan noted that at the last meeting the Board heard an application for a Form A for 15, 17, and 17R Boston Street but held off on the vote until the Board of Appeal approved the requested variance. She reported that the ZBA approved the variance and the plan could be approved. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the Form A for 15, 17, and 17R Boston Street, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Page 4 • There being no further matters to come before the Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB042299 • Page 5 • n� F Gifu of �$ttlent, fflttssadjusdto fi One $alrnt Green � r--< 0 Uj(: N O - T r- �71 Notice of Meeting 3 w D You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Cr Thursday, April 15, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. �. `00 �r Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda 1. Form A— 53 Jefferson Avenue (7:30 PM—7:45 PM) • 2. Form A— 15-17 and 17R Boston Street(7:45 PM—8:00 PM) 3. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—The Bates School—Liberty Hill Avenue (8:00 PM—9:00 PM) 4. Old/New Business (9:00 PM—9:15 PM) 9 This notice posted on "Official 130etin Board" City Hell Ave., Salem, Mass. on APR 121999 • at J, Z OqG accordanw wld' Chap. 39 Sec. 23A i 232 of M. L. F � i & � Cnitu of " Salem, 'Massadjuse##s planning poartb (One Salem (Breen MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: April 12, 1999 RE: Agenda—April 15, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A—53 Jefferson Avenue A Form A plan has been submitted for the lot located at 53 Jefferson Avenue. The subdivision plan provided in your packet shows Lots A, B, C, and D. The plan proposes to combine Lots B and D together and combine Lots A and C together. Through this Form A plan, the applicant is altering the lot's side setbacks for the structure located on Lot A. The applicant has applied with the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance to the side setback requirements. The applicant will be before the Zoning Board of Appeals at their April 21, 1999 meeting. This plan is appropriate for the Planning Board to sign. The Planning Board can choose to sign the plan at the April 15, 1999 meeting and I will hold the Form A plan until the applicant has received Zoning Board of Appeals approval or we can hold off signature until after the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. We have scheduled a special meeting on April 22, 1999 and the plan could be signed at that meeting. That will be after the applicant's Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. 2. Form A— 15-17 and 17R Boston Street A Form A plan has been submitted for the lot located at 15-17 and 17R Boston Street. The lot contains two residential structures, which were in existence prior to the City's Subdivision Control Law. Our Subdivision Control Law states that the separation of a lot with two residential structures on it into two lots is not considered a subdivision if the two structures were in existence prior to Subdivision Control. This plan meets those requirements, thus is not a subdivision and is appropriate for the Board's signature. • PB Memorandum April 12, 1999-2 • 3. Public Hearing—Site Plan Review Special Permit—The Bates School—Liberty Hill Avenue On Thursday, the Board will open a Public Hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the Salem Zoning Ordinance for the Bates School. The Site Plan Review requested is for a project located at Liberty Hill Avenue. The proposed project includes the demolition of approximately 9,730 square feet, the construction of two additions totaling approximately 33,500 square feet, and the construction of 19 additional parking spaces. The additions are proposed to include classrooms, a library, and a stage. Extensive traffic studies have been conducted for the project and it has been determined that the project will have a minimal impact on traffic in the area. In addition, several public meetings have been held in the neighborhood to discuss the project and any concerns the residents may have. I have included a draft decision in your packet for the Board's review. 4. Old/New Business As we discussed at the last Planning Board meeting, Attorney Mark Bobrowski will be holding a seminar for the City of Salem. The seminar is scheduled for April 27, 1999 at 7:00 PM at the Salem Police Station Auditorium. All of the Planning Board is invited to attend. • Information provided by Arty. Bobrowski is included in your packet. • Salem Planning Board 5� y • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, April 15, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, April 15, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: David Hart, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Kim Driscoll and John Moustakis. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. In the absence of Chairman Walter Power, Chuck Puleo assumed the chair. Form A - 53 Jefferson Avenue Aty. Jeffery Shribmann addressed the Board and explained a Form A for 53 Jefferson Avenue. H explained that the plan proposes to combine lots B and D together and combine lots A and C together. He noted that this would alter the side setbacks for the structure located on Lot A and they have applied to the ZBA for a variance on the side setback requirements. Kim Driscoll noted that she sees nothing wrong with the plan but would • prefer to hold off on the decision until the ZBA issues its decision on the variance. Motion made by David Hart to continue the matter until April 22, 1999, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. Form A - 15. 17, and 17R Boston Street Jim Kelley addressed the Board and explained his plan for a Form A for 15, 17, and 17R Boston Street. Mr. Kelley explained that the lot contains two residential structures which were in existence prior to the Subdivision Control Law, which states that the separation of a lot with two residential structures on it into two lots is not considered a subdivision if the two structures were in existence prior to the law. Mr. Kelley noted that there would be no physical changes made to the structures and they are providing for 9 parking spaces for both buildings. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the Form A for 15, 17, and 17R Boston Street, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. • Page 1 L Public Hearing - Site Plan Review Special Permit - The Bates School - • Liberty Hill Avenue Dan Twoberty of Earl Flansburgh and Associates addressed the Board and explained the proposed plans for the renovations of the Bates School. The plans include the demolition of approximately 9730 s.f(the existing Kindergarten wing of the building) and the construction of two additions totaling 33,500 s.f. The plan also calls for the addition of 19 new parking spaces. Bill Cullen asked to have the traffic flow around the building reviewed. Mr. Twoberty explained the traffic flow and noted that traffic studies done for the project determined that the project will have a minimal impact on the area. The bus drop off and pick up areas were also reviewed. Handicapped parking will be in the front of the building only. John Moustakis asked how many more students would be at the Bates after completion of the project. Mr. Twoberty stated that there are presently 383 students at the Bates and it will accommodate 528 at completion, which is an increase of 140 students. Chuck Puleo questioned the bus drop off locations, noting that it is tight fit • there now. Mr. Twoberty stated that their intention is to keep the car and bus traffic as separate as possible. David Hart asked for a review of the recreational facilities. Mr. Twoberty identified the recreation areas and noted that they are planning to put a basketball court in the lower parking area which is seldom used. Chuck Puleo suggested that perhaps there should be a police detail on Liberty Hill Ave. in addition to the crossing guards during drop off and pick up times to direct the traffic. It was noted that School Safety Officer Charlie Reed has reviewed the plan and that he would have to be consulted on that. Chuck Puleo opened the meeting up to public comment at this time. James LeBlanc of 64 Appleton Street addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the lights in the school yard that shine into his living room. Kim Driscoll noted that the lot cannot be reconfigured but the lighting could be redirected. Mr. LeBlanc noted that the driveway will be moved closer to his property. Bill Cullen noted that the approval gives the City Planner the authority,to request more landscaping should it be needed and they could consider that for him at that time, if it is a problem. Denise Sullivan noted • that the approval also states that lighting shall not cast a glare in adjacent parecels. Page 2 David Hart stated that he would like to see a cross section of the plan which • shows the school and the abutters property. John Moustakis asked when they plan to start the construction. Mr. Twoberty stated that they plan to start July 1, and completion is expected in July of 2000. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to close the public hearing, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. The Board reviewed the draft decision for the project. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the Site Plan Special Permit for the Bates School, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. There being no further matters to come before the Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB041599 Page 3 • tr 541 F- Ctu of Att1Em, 'MassadjusVits UFFICE • �A , �' `� � �lttmcitt$ �attril 1999 . (One Salent (Breen 2 53 Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, April 1, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Tff ow" Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda • 1. Request for Continuation of Public Hearing to Next Regularly Scheduled Planning Board Meeting— Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44- 60 Boston Street(7:30 PM—7:40 PM) 2. Continuation of Public.Hearing—Definitive Subdivision Plan—Patton Road Extension (7:40 PM— 8:15 PM) 3. Old/New Business(8:15 PM—8:30 PM) This notlee post®d on 'Official Bulletin Board" City H�ll �ve., Salem, Mass. on MAR g' 9 � e 23A-1 24POf M!' .L ' 4� vh • C to of '$Ultm, AltseadjusAts Planning Puxrb (line �$xlrnt (Breen MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: March 29, 1999 RE: Agenda—April 1, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street The applicant has requested to continue the Public Hearing until the next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting. The applicant has expressed that due to the amount of information requested by the Planning Board, more time is needed in order to be prepared for the Planning Board. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Definitive Subdivision Plan—Patton Road Extension: The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for this project on January 21, 1999. There were several residents in attendance at the Public Hearing. The major concern raised at the Public Hearing was that of drainage. In addition, the Board discussed its many concerns with drainage for the subdivision. A site visit was held on February 6, 1999. Many residents were in attendance. The issues discussed focused primarily on drainage. The most concern lies in those areas located to the rear of Lots #1 and#2, the area proposed to contain a retaining wall, and the area located to the rear of Lots#5 and #6. The Planning Board heard the request again at its February 18, 1999 meeting. An engineer from Hancock Associates addressed the Board concerning the unresolved drainage issues. The applicant stated that 45% of the drainage from the site would be collected into the City • system and that the piping in the area is adequate to handle the additional drainage from the subdivision. PB Memorandum March 29, 1999-2 • The Planning Board heard the request at their March 18, 1999 Planning Board meeting. The discussion focussed on whether the applicant would construct roof drains or a perimeter drain. The Planning Board suggested that the applicant construct roof drains. In addition, the Planning Board requested that the applicant provide information as to the location and possibility of perimeter drains behind the first three lots. The Board also discussed the location of the sidewalk in the project. The applicant is looking into the possibility of constructing a sidewalk on both sides of Patton Road extension and on one side of Patton Road from the subdivision to Surrey Road. A draft decision has been included in your packet. • 5112199 at 9:25 AM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 2 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, April 1, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, April 1, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power. David Hart, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Lee Harrington and John Moustakis. Also present were Senior Planner Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Request for Continuation of Public Hearing -Site Plan Review Suecial Permit Osco Drug - General Office Building - 44 - 60 Boston Street Denise Sullivan informed the Board that the applicants has requested a continuation of the public hearing to the next meeting of the Board in order to provide the information requested by the Board at the last meeting. The Board discussed possible dates for the nest meeting. Denise Sullivan noted that the Site Plan Review for the Bates School project would be on the April 15, 1999 agenda. Walter Power noted that he would be out of town on • that date and suggested having the meeting on April 22, 1999. Motion made by Bill Cullen to continue the public hearing for Osco Drug to April 22, 1999, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearing - Definitive Subdivision Plan - Patton Road Extension Atty. Tom Beatrice addressed the Board and explained that since the last meeting they are willing to propose to install sidewalks on the North side of Patton Road. Mr. DiBiase noted that two residents of Patton Road, Mr. McCarthy and Mr. Barrett are not in favor of the sidewalks. Walter Power noted that it has been the practice of the Planning Board to get sidewalks in areas that need them and he would recommend that the Board consider asking for the sidewalks. He also noted that the Board does not usually consult with the neighbors when trying to improve sidewalks. Bill Cullen noted that if the Board decides that they want the sidewalks he would like to see them at the same elevation. Gene Collins noted that the applicant is requesting a waiver of sidewalks on the North side of the project. Motion made by Gene Collins to grant the 0 5/12/99 at 9:26 AM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 3 • waiver for the sidewalks on the North side of the project, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Motion made by Gene Collins to accept the proposal from the applicant to install sidewalks on the north side of Patton Road; seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. The Board discussed the drainage for the project. Mr. DiBiase explained the proposed perimeter drain and the area. He stated that they feel that this system will help alleviate some of the water problems that they have in the area. A resident of 23 Moffatt Road addressed the Board and stated that he feels that his water problems have increased since the Station Road subdivision was built. Councillor. Mark Blair addressed the Board and requested that they be required to plant trees neat to two lots as a buffer to the neighbors. Karen Edgett of 49 Moffatt Road addressed the Board and expressed her concern that she was not convinced that the roof drainage system would not address the drainage problems. Bill Cullen noted that they are • professionally confident that their plan will address the drainage problems. David Hart noted that if the roof drain system does not address the problems the City Planner can address that. O / v The Board reviewed the Order of Conditions for the project. �! Motion made by Lee Harrington to approve the Form C - Definitive Subdivision plan for Patton Road Extension, seconded by Gene Collins and approved 7 - 0. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Denise Sullivan informed the Board that there would be a workshop on April 27, 1999 at the Salem. Police Station featuring Mark Bobrowski an expert in. zoning issues. Denise Sullivan reported that Walgreens is going forward and they should be breaking ground soon. A discussion was held on the color of the brick for the proposed building. Bill Cullen moved and John Moustakis seconded a motion to require that the color of the brick for the building be red. The motion was approved 7 - 0. • 5/12/99 at 9:26 AM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 4 • Walter Power asked if the issue of making Proctor Street a two way was going to go to the City Council. Councillor At Large Tom Furey addressed the Board and explained the Ward Four Councillor Leonard O'Leary is not in favor of Proctor Street Uecoining a two "ryy strlli � WW�d �4.�1Uv�,{CS hciC�Q4�l�-�� L3 There being no further matters to come before the Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. � The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PB040199 • • C ip of '�5'tzlPm, ttsstzrl�us,�##s x 3 ' , y Idlamtin$ Poarb @ne Salem (Preen Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, March 18, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda • 1. Withdrawal Request of Wetlands Special Permit for 435 Lafayette Street (7:30 PM— 7:40 PM) 2. Continuation of Public Hearing— Site Plan Special Petmit— Osco Drug Store and General Office Building - 44-60 Boston Street (7:40 PM— 8:40 PM) 3. Continuation of Public Hearing — Definitive Subdivision Plan— Patton Road Extension (8:40 PM— 9:40 PM) 4. Continuation of Public Hearing — Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Special Permit— Home Depot, 50 Traders Way (9:40 PM— 10:40 PM) 5. Old/New Business (10:40 PM — 10:50 PM) • r ai#>u, of *Iem, gasoadjusdto �;��' � �lamting �uxt•t� One Mem U5xent MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: March 15, 1999 RE: Agenda—March 18, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Withdrawal Request of Wetlands Special Permit for 435 Lafayette Street: The request was originally scheduled for the February 4, 1999 Planning Board meeting. At that meeting, the applicant requested a continuance in order for the Conservation Commission to issue a decision prior to opening the Planning Board Public Hearing. Since the Planning Board meeting, the Conservation Commission denied the applicant's Notice of Intent application. Because of the Conservation Commission's denial, the applicant has requested to withdraw its request before the Planning Board. The Board must vote on the withdrawal request so that the application withdrawn without prejudice. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for this project on February 4, 1999. There were many residents in attendance. The residents expressed their concerns with traffic, drainage, and the location of the entrances on the site. The Board's discussion focussed on traffic and drainage on the site. In particular, the Board requested that the applicant look into the flood elevations on the site and the possibility of drainage exiting the site to the abutting parcels. In addition, the Board requested the applicant look into improvements for the Boston Street/Bridge Street intersection. A copy of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision has been included in the packet. PB Memorandum March 15, 1999-2 • 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Definitive Subdivision Plan—Patton Road Extension: The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for this project on January 21, 1999. There were several residents in attendance at the Public Hearing. The major concern raised at the Public Hearing was that of drainage. In addition, the Board discussed its many concerns with drainage for the subdivision. A site visit was held on February 6, 1999. Many residents were in attendance. The issues discussed focused primarily on drainage. The most concern lies in those areas located to the rear of Lots #1 and #2, the area proposed to contain a retaining wall, and the area located to the rear of Lots #5 and #6. The Planning Board heard the request again at its February 18, 1999 meeting. An engineer from Hancock Associates addressed the Board concerning the unresolved drainage issues. The applicant stated that 45% of the drainage from the site would be collected into the City system and that the piping in the area is adequate to handle the additional drainage from the subdivision. The applicant will be presenting to the Board an option for either a perimeter drain on the site or utilizing roof drains to further alleviate the drainage entering adjacent parcels from the proposed development site. In addition, the applicant will be discussing the construction of the retaining wall. A draft decision has been included in your packet. 4. Continuation of Public Hearing—Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review—Home Depot: The Board opened a public hearing on Thursday, January 21, 1999, for the request from Home Depot, Inc for the construction of a Home Depot store at 50 Traders Way. Several residents spoke on the application. The primary concern illustrated by the neighbors was traffic. Specifically, the neighbors spoke about the addition of traffic lights at several street corners, such as Swampscott Road and First Street. In addition, concerns were raised pertaining to pedestrian traffic, loading times, the noise of the rooftop equipment, and the maintenance of the rip-rap slope on the site. The Planning Board heard the request again at their February 4, 1999 meeting. The applicant reviewed with the Board an option of an additional entrance to the site off Swampscott Road. The applicant stated that the engineering for the roadway was feasible but the land adjacent to Swampscott Road was not owned by the applicant and could not be purchased. At the February 6`s site visit, the applicant discussed the possibility of providing a second entrance off Highland Avenue through Green Ledge Street (a paper street). The applicant reviewed the possibility of an entrance through Green Ledge Street and presented the plans at the Board's February 18, 1999 meeting. There were several abutters in attendance who voiced their concerns pertaining to the development of the paper street. The Board discussed the option at the meeting and decided to review the possible second entrance further at its March 18, 1999 meeting. • PB Memorandum March 15, 1999-3 • At Thursday's meeting, the applicant will present a plan, which gives an overview of all the traffic improvements associated with the proposed Home Depot. In addition, the applicant will present explanation as to whether a right hand turning lane in front of the Ground Round is possible and the option of constructing a full stop light at the corner of First Street and Traders Way. A draft decision has been included in your packet. " Ctu of $alpni, f Mssartlitutts • 3,'.; Planning Poarb r,= °af�umc r� One Salem Orren �T o r- nM NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF MEETING D Mi mz N n You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, March 4, 1999, at 7:30 PM in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled. The next regular Planning Board meeting will be held on Thursday, March 18, 1999. The continuation of the Public Hearing for the Osco Drug Store request (44-60 Boston Street) will be heard at the March 18, 1999 Planning Board meeting. 10�It Walter B. Power, III Chairman This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall AV&., .SY. ei.lem, tdlasS. on f AR 1 J999 at /,a/ 410 i; a.^')0=n` 6 w"-V1 C".ap• 39 pec. 23A A 228 of dA.G.L. of "nkni, tt s�zcl�usk�##s • ; ' 111atmin$ Paarb r, . (One jkzlem (Sreat MEMORANDUM TO: Salem Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: February 24, 1999 RE: Joint Public Hearing with Council and Status of March 4, 1999 Meeting A second joint Public Hearing has been scheduled by the City Council to discuss the Haunted House Ordinance. The joint Public Hearing has been scheduled for March 15, 1999 at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. I need to verify that I will have six members present to open the • Public Hearing. In addition, we have a regularly scheduled meeting on March 4, 1999. Two members of the Board will not be present at this meeting. I have spoken with Joe Correnti, the representative for the Osco request, about discussing the request at this meeting. Mr. Correnti stated that without two members present, he would not want Osco heard on March 4, 1999 due to the issue of the required number of members able to vote on the Site Plan. We have two options. We can either reschedule the meeting of March 4, 1999 to March 9 or 10, 1999 (I am not available on the evening of March 11) or place Osco on the agenda of March 18, 1999. Already on the agenda for March 18, 1999 is the Home Depot request and the Patton Road request. Please contact me at the Planning Department at 745-9595 to let me know if you are able to attend the joint Public Hearing on March 15, 1999 at 6:00 PM. In addition, please let me know whether you would like to reschedule the meeting of March 4, 1999 to March 9 or 10. If we cannot get enough members able to attend either of these two dates, we can put Osco on the March 18, 1999 agenda. Thank You. • i s �� 4MM. CITY OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE ' C to of '�$ttlem,In tt sttrl�u�I�## x • ;,': p Tlamtin$ Poarb 1999 FEB lb All: I b @m �alem (Green Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, February 18, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. J Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda • Y Approval of January 7, 1999 Meeting Minutes (7:30 PM—7:40 PM) Form A— Swampscott Road and Whalers Lane—Fafard Condos (7:40 PM— 8:00 PM) a 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Special Permit—Home Depot, 50 Traders Way (8:00 PM— 9:00 PM) 4. Continuation of Public Hearing—Definitive Subdivision Plan — Patton Road Extension (9:00 PM— 10:00 PM) 5. Old/New Business (10:00 PM— 10:15 PM) This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" C14�r Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on FEg at I I'l6 a l m pe accordance With Cl iP. j 23A & 228 of M.G.L. • of Salem, itt�sttcl�usl>##s �;�+J� a P �Ittnning �uxrd Om Mem Greett MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Plannert� Salem Planning Department DATE: February 16, 1999 RE: Agenda—February 18, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Form A—Swampscott Road and Whalers Lane—Fafard Condos: In your packet you will find a Form A plan for parcels of land located at Swampscott Road and Whalers Lane. These parcels are included in the Fafard Condominium project. The Form A plan shows the subdivision of one lot into four lots. Lots A and C meet the minimum frontage requirements as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Lots B and D are not buildable lots and are labeled as such on the plan. This plan is appropriate for the Board's signature. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing—Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review—Home Depot: The Board opened a public hearing on Thursday, January 21, 1999, for the request from Home Depot, Inc for the construction of a Home Depot store at 50 Traders Way. Several residents spoke on the application. The primary concern illustrated by the neighbors was traffic. Specifically, the neighbors spoke about the addition of traffic lights at several street corners, such as Swampscott Road and First Street. In addition, concerns were raised pertaining to pedestrian traffic, loading times, the noise of the rooftop equipment, and the maintenance of the rip-rap slope on the site. The Planning Board heard the request again at their February 4, 1999 meeting. The applicant reviewed with the Board an option of an additional entrance to the site off of Swampscott Road. The applicant stated that the engineering for the roadway was feasible but the land adjacent to Swampscott Road was not owned by the applicant and could not be purchased. At the February 6` site visit, the applicant discussed the possibility of providing a second • entrance off of Highland Avenue through Green Ledge Street. Green Ledge Street is a paper street and the applicant is reviewing the feasibility of constructing the street as a second PB Memorandum February 16, 1999-2 . means of access to the site. The applicant will present plans at the Board's meeting which will show whether this is a possible option. At the Board's February 4,1999 meeting, the applicant presented plans to restripe Traders Way into a four lane road. The Board reviewed the plans and suggested that the traffic engineer consider the option of restriping the road into a two lane road with a center turning lane. The applicant will discuss this option and its effects on traffic at the Board's meeting. 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Definitive Subdivision Plan —Patton Road Extension: The Planning Board opened a Public Hearing for this project on January 21, 1999. There were several residents in attendance at the Public Hearing. The major concern raised at the Public Hearing was that of drainage. In addition, the Board discussed its many concerns with drainage for the subdivision. In response to the concerns raised at the Public Hearing, the attached letter was sent to Mr. DiBiase, which articulated that issues which should be addressed to the Board. A site visit was held on February 6, 1999. Many residents were in attendance. The issues discussed focused primarily on drainage. The most concern lies in those areas located to the rear of Lots#1 and #2, the area proposed to contain a retaining wall, and the area located to the rear of Lots #5 and #6. • • s Planning Pnxrb (One Salem (preen January 26, 1999 Paul DiBiase Vincent DiBiase, Inc. PO Box 780 Lynnfield, MA 01940 RE: Proposed Patton Road Extension Subdivision Dear Paul: As discussed, the following is a listing of the comments and direction received from the Planning Board concerning your application for the Patton Road Extension Subdivision: 1. The design of the storm water system should meet the new Department of Environmental • Protection (DEP) guidelines. Please provide the Board with information, which shows that the submitted plan meets the new DEP guidelines regarding storm water design. 2. Please provide a plan which shows the current drainage of the site (where the water run-off flows off of the site) prior to construction. In addition,please provide a plan which illustrates how the water will drain off the site after it has been developed as a nine lot subdivision. Describe what percentage of the lots will be draining into the roadway system and the amount of water being handled on the site. 3. Is there a possibility that the entire square footage of the proposed nine parcels can be tied into an underground system so as to eliminate sheeting altogether. If researched and found that this option in not feasible, please provide possible alternatives for the Board's discussion. 4. Please show a cross section of the proposed retaining wall. In addition, show a cross section of the slope proposed for grading in the rear of Lots #1 and 2 and of the area to the rear of Lot#6. 5. Please provide a plan to the Planning Board, which shows the drainage system from where it crosses Loring Avenue until it empties into the North River. 6. Please provide calculations to the Planning Board which verify that the City drainage system • in which the subdivision will be connected has the capacity to handle the additional load of • the proposed Patton Road subdivision. Include the additional load carried by the Station Road subdivision in the calculations. The 100 year storm must be taken into account in the calculations. 7. Please provide the Planning Board with calculations as to the adequacy of the sewer system on Moffat Road to handle the additional nine homes. In addition to the comments and direction made by Planning Board, I am including some items which need to be cleaned up on the plan: 1. On the first page, please include a lot line between the two lots which were approved through the ANR process. 2. On the fourth page, please remove the additional lot line, which is shown on the ANR lots. 3. Please state the types of street trees proposed for the site. 4. Please revise the sewer and drainage lines as shown on the plan. Where the lines go through the right of way (the driveway between the Kinney and DeFrancesco lot), the sewer and drainage lines are labeled incorrectly. In addition, the two lines cross in the southwestern portion of the right-of-way and then again in the northeastern portion. This is not necessary, please revise so the lines do not cross. • Please contact me at the Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions. Once you have addressed these issues, we can schedule a meeting including myself and Assistant City Engineer Mike Collins to go over the changes. Sincerely, Denise Sullivan Senior Planner CITY OF SALEM, MA CLERK'S OFFICE C to of "ittlem, tt sttrl2u >�##s • ;,� � y jglatttting Poarb 1999 FEB -2 P 1: 01 @m Salem (Greett Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, February 4, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. PO ryqr Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda • J 1. Public Hearing— Wetlands Special Permit—435 Lafayette Street 7:30 PM— 8:OO PM). ► reh 4' - _ Public Hearing— Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building 44-60 Boston Street (8:00 PM—9:0 PM) ��t�tt,�U�1 V� Fr✓b 1$ 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Special Permit—Home Depot, 50 Traders Way (9:00 PM —9:30 PM) 4. Old/New Business (9:45 PM— 10:00 PM) Discussion pertaining to the Salvo Lawsuit This notice posted on °Offlelal Bulletin Bosahl" City Hall Ave., Salem, Mass. on FEB 2 1999 at 1 r 0 lM t� accordance with Chap. 39 Sec. 23A .A 226 of M.G.L. • Ctu of �ttlEm, Ir��sttrl�us>�##s (lyre Salrm (Srertt MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: February 2, 1999 RE: Agenda—February 4, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. Public Hearing—Wetlands Special Permit—435 Lafayette Street: On Thursday, the Board will open up a Public Hearing for a Wetlands Special Permit at the property located at 435 Lafayette Street at the request of Kevin Gelpy, with Atty. George Atkins acting as agent. The request is for the construction of a single family house on the lot located at 435 Lafayette Street. The plans show the construction of a single-family dwelling, utilities, and landscaping in a buffer zone to a salt marsh and over land subject to coastal storm flowage. The dwelling is proposed to be constructed on piles. The Conservation Commission has conducted a Public Hearing on this request, but has not yet made a decision. I have spoken to Atty. George Atkins pertaining to this request. Atty. Atkins has stated that he plans to request a continuance until after the Conservation Commission makes a formal decision on the project: I recommend that the Planning Board does not make a decision on this request until the Conservation Commission has made its decision. 2. Public Hearing—Site Plan Special Permit—Osco Drug Store and General Office Building—44-60 Boston Street: On Thursday, the Board will open up a Public Hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the Salem Zoning, at the request of Kennedy Development. Atty. Joseph Correnti is acting as agent. The site proposed for development is located at 44-66 Boston Street. The plans show the lot • which formally held the Sylvania Manufacturing Plant to be divided into two lots. The plans PB Memorandum February 2, 1999-2 propose the construction of a 13,600 square foot Osco Drug Store on a 78,940 square foot • lot. The building will front on Bridge Street. The second lot is proposed to house an approximately 23,000 square foot office building on a 60,380 square foot parcel. A parking lot containing 168 parking spaces which will be utilized by both the Osco Drug Store and the office building is proposed to be constructed as well. There will be cross easements provided for access between the two lots. As the Board requested, I have sent a memorandum to Assistant City Solicitor John Keenan concerning the requirements of the Board to hear a application which is currently under appeal. I have not yet received a response from Atty. Keenan, but I have spoken to him and he will provide a response prior to Thursday night's meeting. I have enclosed a copy of the application and plans for your review. Atty. Joseph Correnti will present the plans for your review. 3. Continuation of Public Hearing—Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review—Home Depot: The Board opened a public hearing on Thursday, January 21, 1999, for the request from Home Depot, Inc for the construction of a Home Depot store at 50 Traders Way. Several residents spoke on the application. The primary concern illustrated by the neighbors was traffic. Specifically, the neighbors spoke about the addition of traffic lights at several street corners, such as Swampscott Road and First Street. In addition, concerns were raised pertaining to pedestrian traffic, loading times, the noise of the rooftop equipment, and the maintenance of the rip-rap slope on the site. • The applicant has agreed to look into more specific comparisons with the Danvers store site as to parking lot size and traffic flow. In addition, the applicant will be providing information pertaining to the noise generation of the site, the height of the proposed building, a cross section of Traders Way showing all of the entrances, and a comparison of what is permitted in the existing PUD and the underlying Zoning District. A site visit has been set for Saturday, February 6, 1999. The Board planned to meet at the Patton Road site at 9:00 AM and then head over to the Home Depot site following the Patton Road site visit. I have enclosed a copy of the application and plans for your review. 4. Old Business: Salvo Lawsuit: In the packet, you will find a letter addressed to Atty. Bill Lundregan from Atty. Edmund Smith pertaining to the Salvo Lawsuit. Please review the letter and we will discuss it at the end of the meeting. Thank you. • n C to of "ittlm, Passadjusdts �• ' ,� P �latnting �uttrt� One �$rtlent (Green MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: January 19, 1999 RE: Agenda—January 21, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. ANR Plan—Flint Street and Warren Street: An ANR Plan has been submitted for the lot located on the comer of Flint Street and Warren Street. There is one lot with two residential structures located on it. The applicant is attempting to sell one of the structures and needs to create separate lots. The proposed lots do not meet zoning requirements. The City of Salem Subdivision Regulations permits the subdivision of a parcel of land which has two buildings located on it, if they were standing prior to the creation of the City's Subdivision Regulations. The regulations consider it appropriate for ANR approval, even if the lots do not meet Zoning requirements. This ANR Plan is appropriate for the Planning Board's approval. 2. Public Hearing—Definitive Subdivision Plan—Patton Road Extension: On Thursday, the Board will open up a Public Hearing under the City of Salem Subdivision Rules and Regulations, at the request of Vincent DiBiase, Inc. The definitive subdivision plan was submitted for the parcel, which consists of approximately four acres of land and is located at the end of the existing Patton Road. The subdivision plan shows the construction of an extension to Patton Road which ends in a cul- de-sac. The lot is proposed to be subdivided into nine lots, each consisting of a minimum of 15,000 square feet and 100 feet of frontage. The plan shows the construction of a sidewalk on one side of Patton Road as opposed to the required two sides. Mr. DiBiase has requested a waiver from the requirement to construct a sidewalk on both sides of the proposed • roadway. PB Memorandum January 19, 1999-2 • I have enclosed a copy of the application and plans for your review. 3. Public Hearing—Amendment To An Existing Planned Unit Development and Site Plan Review—Home Depot: On Thursday, the Board will open a Public Hearing under Section 7-18, Site Plan Review of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and to amend an existing Planned Unit Development, at the request of Home Depot, Inc. The Site Plan Review requested is for a project located at 50 Traders Way. The plan shows the demolition of the old Somerville Lumber Building and the construction of a Home Depot store. The site proposed for development consists of 16.31 acres. The plan proposes the construction of a 133,000 square foot Home Depot Store, which includes 117,000 square feet of retail warehouse space and a 16,200 square foot outdoor garden center and house plant enclosure. In addition, the plan shows the construction of a 604 space parking lot. I have enclosed a copy of the application and plans for your review. Attorney Joseph Correnti will present the plans for your review on Thursday and answer any questions you may have. • • `OMOJ`�o CITY0 S11LE'M, MA Ctu of �algm, MSgttr��115k' g CLE41i'S OFFICE • Planning r 1999 JAI (One Salem (i�reEtt L -u P 2: 22 Johti I\1 . - VOCQ YMVS� Notice of Meeting You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its regular meeting on Thursday, January 7, 1999 at 7:30 PM, in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Walter B. Power, III Chairman Tentative Agenda • 1. Approval of December 17, 1998 Meeting Minutes (7:30 PM— 7:40 PM) 2. ANR Plan— 8 and 10 Patton Road (7:40 PM-8:00 PM) 3. Release of Funds For Station Road Extension Subdivision (8:00 PM—8:30 PM) 4. Old/New Business (8:30 PM— 8:45 PM) Review Haunted House Recommendation This nodes posted on 'O"Icla.l Rulletln Board" at1tY Hall r^An e' 3. -I Alass. on 23A A 228 of AA.G.t . ..ac. (gi#h oftt1em, Httssttrl�us>�##� Plarnting Poarb (IBneMent (6reert MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Denise Sullivan, Senior Planner Salem Planning Department DATE: January 4, 1999 RE: Agenda—January 7, 1999 The following is a brief description of the items, which are listed on the attached agenda. Please contact me at the Salem Planning Department at 745-9595, extension 311, if you have any questions pertaining to the agenda items. • 1. 8 and 10 Patton Road—ANR Plan: Paul DiBiase has submitted an ANR Plan for the Planning Board's approval for the two lots located at 8 and 10 Patton Road. The Board previously approved an ANR Plan to create these two lots. Mr. DiBiase has begun to construct houses on these lots and has determined that if he shifts the lot lines he can minimize the blasting conducted on the lots. With the shifting of the lot lines, the lots will be increased from 15,132 square feet and 15,090 square feet, to 16,839 square feet and 17,062 square feet respectively. 2. Release of Funds For Station Road Extension: The subdivision located on Station Road has been completed by the developer. Paul DiBiase, the developer, is requesting the release of the funds held by the City for the completion of the subdivision. The funds are held in a passbook and are in the amount of$176,000.00. I have conducted a final inspection with Willy and we have determined that the subdivision is complete. Mr. DiBiase has submitted as-built plans, which Willy and I have reviewed. The as-built plans are complete, as well. I recommend that the funds be released to Mr. DiBiase. • •12;2199 at 11:13 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978) 7451976 Page: 2 Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, January 7, 1999 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, January 7, 1999 in the conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Bill Cullen, Chuck Puleo, Lee Harrington, Carter Vinson and Gene Collins. Also present were Denise Sullivan and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the meeting of December 17, 1998 were presented for approval. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the minutes of the meeting of December 7, 1998 as amended, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. Form A - Approval Not Required (ANR) 8 - 10 Patton Road • Paul DiBiase addressed the Board and explained his plan for a Form A for 8 - 10 Patton Road. He noted that the Board previously- approved an A1NR to create these two lots. Mr. DiBiase explained that he has started construction on the lots and has found that if he shifts the lot lines he can minimize the blasting that needs to be done on the lots. With the shifting of the lot lines the lots will be increased from 15.1:32 s.f. and 15,090 s.f. to 16. 8:39 s.f. and 17,OG2 s.f respectively. Walter Power asked if there were sidewalks on either side of the street on Patton Road. Mr. DiBiase stated that there were no sidewalks on Patton Road. Mr. DiBiase also noted that there is no provision in this plan to bring the sidewalks back clown Patton Road to Surrey Road. He stated that the other plan for the other lots on the other side addresses sidewalks to some extent. Motion made by Carter Vinson to approve the Form A for 8 - 10 Patton Road. seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously. • .2099 at 11:14 PM Eileen M. Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 3 • Page 1. Release of Funds for Station Road Extension Subdivision Denise Sullivan addressed the Board and stated that she has received a request from Mr. DiBiase to release the cash bond from the Station Road Subdivision. Ms. Sullivan stated that the project is complete and she has completed a final inspection with Will Beaulieu. She also noted that Mr. DiBiase has submitted as built plans to the Planning Department. Motion made by Lee Harrington to release the construction bond for the Station Road Subdivision, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Old / New Business Haunted House Ordinance The Board reviewed the response that they will send to the Salem City Council regarding the Haunted House Ordninace. • Carter Vinson stated that he felt that while the ordinance was flawed the intent was good and requested that the letter be edited to reflect that only the members present at the meeting when it was discussed approved the motion. He noted that had he been present at the meeting he most likely would have voted against the response. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the response as amended. seconded by Gene Collins and approved 6-1 with Carter Vinson opposed. Walgreens Update Denise Sullivan reported that Craig Wheeler has met with representatives of Walgreens and it seems that they have found that there is more to clean up than they anticipated. She noted that they hope to pull a building permit in April and when they do, the Planning Department will go to the City Council to make Proctor Street a two way street. • Page 2 . 12y99 at 11:15 PM Eileen M.Sacco (978)7451976 Page: 4 • There being no further matters to come before the Board at this meeting, a motion was made by David Hart to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. The meeting-was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk Salem Planning Board PBO 10 i 99 • •