Loading...
1997-PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD • HELD ON DECEMBER 18, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, December 18, 1997 at 7:40 p.m. Chairman Walter Power called the meeting to order and on roll call the following members answered present: Gene Collins, William Cullen, Kim Driscoll, L. Lee Harrington, David Hart, John Moustakis and Carter Vinson. Chuck Puleo arrived late. Staff administrator Beth Debski was also present. DISCUSSION/NEW BUSINESS Lot Division at 160-162 Ocean Ave.West Chairman Power asked Mr. Lapham to address the board on the issue of sub-dividing his lot at 160-162 Ocean Ave. West into two lots. Mr. Lapham explained that he was going through the process of dividing the lot with the intentions of a single family home being built on the lot. Lapham states that the zoning allows only a single family home to be built on the lot. Mr. Vinson suggests that the two conditions attached to the Zoning Board of Appeals decision (a covenant that a home built will be single family and that it will be attached to the deed) be used in the Planning Board's decision. Chairman Power asked for public comment and there was none. Mr. Harrington motioned to close, the motion was seconded, all in favor, the motion so carried. Mr. Vinson moved to approve with the two conditions attached as stated above, the motion was seconded, all were in favor, the motion so carried. Waiver for Frontage Requirements of Subdivision Control Law for Kerr Leather at 63 • Jefferson Ave Chairman Power read a letter in support of the proposal from Councilor Stanley Usovicz. Joe Correnti of 63 Federal Street, representing Hugh Kerr, explained the proposal is to subdivide the lot to create two new lots, lot 3 and 4 as shown on plan. Mr. Correnti further explained that the issue went to the Zoning Board of Appeals on the previous night, and that variances requested were granted in reference to frontage and density. This proposal asked for a waiver for lot four so that it can be developed. Mr. Correnti stated that the variances granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals that pertained to lot four were for relief for frontage and area. Mr. Vinson pointed out that any buildings built on the lot would have to be approved separately in the future. Chairman Power asked for public comment. Dennis Baker of 152 Jersey St., Marblehead stated that he represented Mr. Glickman, operator of Titus Furniture for 25 years. Mr. Baker wanted to have Mr. Glickman's objection noted because of his concern about the effect on his retail business due to increased traffic, noise, odd lot shape, and a building which could block the view of his business down Jefferson Ave. There were no more comments from the public. Mr. Vinson asked how the variance was drafted and if the waiver of density allowed it to be used for industrial purposes. Mr. Correnti explained that the density referred only to frontage and area requirements in order to make it a legally subdividable lot. Mr. Vinson expressed concern in approving the waiver the day after the Zoning Board of Appeals decision because its appeals period had not yet finished. Ms. Driscoll suggested that the approval be pending approval of the variances. Mr. Correnti accepted this • suggestion. Mr. Hart made a motion to close, the motion was seconded, all were in favor, the motion so carried. Ms. Driscoll moved to approve the waiver pending approval of variance. Chairman Power seconded the motion, all were in favor, the motion so carried. • Continuation of Public Hearing of Vinnin Square Phase Four Chairman Power explained that no decision would be made at this hearing. Mr. Correnti explained the progress that had been made since the last meeting, which included plan revisions to show three buildings on the lot instead of four and 178 units in Phase 4. Mr. Correnti further explained that the revised plan shows a parking lot east of Carol Way which includes 25 spaces for the elderly home and 38 for the Village instead of the fourth building. The revised plan also includes a heavily landscaped area. The plan uses Loring Towers Road as a one-way exit, and allows entrance and exit through Carol Way to Weatherly Drive. Mr. Correnti also noted that there are two levels of underground parking proposed in the buildings. George Atkins,representing the trustees of the Village at Vinnin Square, stated that the revised plans have the approval of the trustees and added to Mr. Correnti' s explanation that significant traffic improvements would be made to Carol Way and to Loring Towers Road. Mr. Correnti explained that the density lost by removing the fourth building from the plans was replaced by adding one floor to the other three buildings and that the required variances had been granted. Chairman Power asked who controlled the pond at the site and Mr. Correnti replied that the condo group controlled the pond but that it is the subject of some of the existing condo associations as well. Chairman Power stated that the pond contributed significant beauty to the site and that the board would like at the next meeting to know who would be controlling • it so that its upkeep is maintained. Mr. Atkins asserted that the trustees had been working with the developer on improvement and upkeep of the pond. Mr. Harrington asked how high the buildings were; Mr. Correnti stated that they were 52 to 58 feet high with 5-6 floors aboveground, and that because the elevation goes down, 6 floors does not look as high compared to the remainder of the Village buildings. Mr. Harrington asked who owned Loring Towers Road, and Mr. Correnti replied that it was a private road over which the Village has rights to use. Mr. Cullen asked where Loring Towers Road is one way; Mr. Correnti answered that it is one way just to get to Loring Towers. Mr. Vinson asked how maintenance of the private road is expressed and Mr. Correnti stated that Loring Towers does the maintenance and the Village uses the road but the discussion between owners hasn't involved maintenance yet. Mr. Vinson stated that the maintenance would have to be worked out to deal with issues such as snow removal and Mr. Correnti agreed that it would be discussed in the future. Mr. Hart asked if VHB engineered the one way portion of the road and Mr. Correnti confirmed that it did. Chairman Power asked if the developer had plans for the layout of the pond. Mr. Correnti said that the pond is part of Phase 4 and the subject of the agreement with developers and trustees. Chairman Power asked Mr. Correnti to bring plans for the pond to the next discussion. • Mr. Harrington asked if the condominium association would be for all three buildings, and Mr. Correnti said that there was one association for all three buildings. • Chairman Power asked about the athletic facilities, and Mr. Correnti stated that there would be an addition put on to the recreation complex. Chairman Power asked trustees to speak. August Miller stated that he was a trustee for Phase three and that a majority of the trustees for all three boards were in support of the plan and that the boards are very satisfied with the revised plan. Mr. Harrington asks what the vote was for the approval of the previous phases, and Mr. Miller stated that the first two were unanimous and the third was four to one. Carol McGowan of 24-1 Weatherly Dr. said she reiterates what Mr. Correnti and Mr. Atkins said and that the trustees are satisfied with the agreement. Norman Bogosian of 35 Valiant Way stated that he supported the plans and asked for approval. Joan Raybone of 36 Weatherly Dr., on the board of trustees, said she supports the plan. Daniel Cerette stated he was speaking for Phase 1 and said he was pleased with the plan for Phase 4. Christopher Todd of 43 Valiant Way and a Phase 1 trustee said everyone was in support and he asked for approval. • Leon McDonald of 52 Weatherly Dr. said he has reservations about speeding and feels that the increased density will make the chance of near-misses even worse because the road is very narrow and the sun causes problems. Steven Salvo of 25 Raymond Ave. stated there could be over 200 cars in the parking area and wanted to know the width of the road. Steven Dedarian stated that the road was 28 feet and widened down Carol Way. Chairman Power stated that there were proposed cutbacks at Loring Ave. Gene Collins made a motion to continue, the motion was seconded, all were in favor,the motion was so carried. Planned Unit Development Special Permit for Salem State Colleee Assistance Corporation SS( CAC) Chairman Power stated that a discussion would be held on the granting of a planned unit development special permit for the former GTE site. Ms. Driscoll stated that she was a member of the Salem State College Alumni Board of Directors and the Salem State college Foundation Board of Directors. Mr. Vinson disclosed that his wife is a professor at Salem State College. Mr. Harrington stated that his wife is the treasurer of the Salem State College Foundation. Mr. Atkins,representing the SSCAC, explained that the permit would be for the former GTE-Sylvania site. Nancy Harrington, president of Salem State College, gave a brief history of the plan's development and said that neighbors and businesses in the area had sought out the college to move to the site. Ms. Harrington further stated that the four goals • four the site were to alleviate part of the parking problems in South Salem, relieve the space problems of the college, provide open space and recreation areas, and keep the site on the tax rolls of the City. • Mr. Atkins explained what the proposed four main uses of the site would be: educational use, small business use, industrial use, and recreational use. He added that the site would provide 668 parking spaces to reduce the parking problem in the area, and asserted that the parking would not affect the Loring/Canal intersection. Mr. Vinson asked for specific examples showing the interconnectedness between the college and the neighborhood. Jonathan Woodman, Chairman of the SSCAC answered that the business school would be developed there and that small, entrepreneurial businesses could get their start at the site and later move into the neighborhood. Mr. Woodman also stated that the theater department could train people to make better presentations, and could train business people. Mr. Atkins stated that the site would not be used for non-profit purposes so the site would still pay taxes. Steve Heiken of ICON Architecture explained that the current plan was designed as such to create more parking space,that the bike trail area next to the site could be used as an egress in case of flood, and the design was made to turn the site into a campus. Mr. Heiken also asserted that the traffic would not be a problem because there would be less of a peak than when GE occupied the site. Mr. Vinson asked if 1993 data was being used to show a decrease in traffic, and if the decrease was consistent. Mr. Heiken responded that he was not sure if the decrease was consistent. Ms. Driscoll suggested the use of a 1980's study. Chairman Power suggested that no left turns be allowed onto Loring Ave and Mr. Heiken stated it was already • designed that way. Mr. Heiken also stated that the internal circulation of traffic on the site was not finalized. Mr. Moustakis raised the issue of erecting a parking garage on the site and Mr. Heiken stated that the site provided enough parking without a parking garage. Ms. Harrington said that neighbors were not in favor of a parking garage. Mr. Hart asked if their were plans for a recreation area and Ms. Harrington stated that the biology department was interested in the salt marsh. Chairman Power asked for public comment. Ed Lynch of 91 Loring Ave, stated concerns about traffic in the area. Mr. Lynch stated he felt there was a need for direct access to Jefferson Ave. from the site. Mr. Atkins stated that a traffic study needed to be done for the area. Councilor Mark Blair stated that traffic is a problem, but that this is a good plan and he wants to make sure it doesn't tum into a retail project. Mr. Vinson asked if the Planning Board could get a statement of purpose from SSCAC in regards to the site. Jt Ms. Driscoll suggested getting information on other business parks that are associated with colleges to get an idea of what others are doing. Ms. Driscoll also asked what detail was needed in the plan to get an approval and stated the level of detail of the plans presented was not something the board generally approves. Mr. Atkins stated that the plans could be • changed and added to. Mr. Atkins also said that the site should not be responsible for the traffic problems. Mr. Moustakis stated that the impact on the neighborhood was the most important. • Chairman Power read into record other approvals: the Building Inspector concurs, the Engineer wanted to make owners aware of the planned replacement of a drain line on the site, the Conservation Commission need more information because of concerns about the buffer zones and runoff from the roof, and the Board of Health listed the approval of plans. Mr. Moustakis made a motion to continue, the motion was seconded, all were in favor, the motion so carried. Mr. Harrington brought up old business, Mr. Harrington made a motion to adjourn the meeting, the motion was seconded, all were in favor, the motion so carried. Meeting stands adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Meagan Cahill Staff Assistant • • Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, November 20, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, November 20,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, John Moustakis, , Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Kim Driscoll and Bill Cullen. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. FORM A - 127 MARLBOROUGH ROAD Mr. Joseph Grenier addressed the Board and requested approval of a Form A for 127 Marlborough Road. He explained that he has signed a purchase and sales agreement with the Furnari's. Mr. Grenier explained his plans and noted that the R1 zoning and the conservation area is now noted on the plan. Chuck Puleo recalled that there were 14 lots approved for this site. Mr. Grenier stated that when he priced out the project he found it to be cost prohibitive and did not work out to be feasible. He stated that he has reduced the plan to using the frontage only and he will have 7 lots. • John Moustakis asked if he was planning on having shared driveways. Mr. Grenier stated that he will be selling the lots and that he will encourage the owners to use the shared driveway concept. He noted that the lots have sufficient frontage and area. John Moustakis stated that Marlborough Road is a bad area and he would like to see another solution. Mr. Grenier stated that with the shared driveways there would be a turnaround and two feet to widen Marlborough Road. Walter Power stated that he did not like the plan. He stated that backing out of Marlborough Road is dangerous. David Hart questioned if it was a matter of economics rather that the use of the land. He stated that he has a problem with the plan, and noted that the neighbors across the street had concerns about the other plan. He stated that he was concerned for the safety of the people across the street. Bill Cullen stated that no one is happy with this plan. Kim Driscoll suggested that they move the houses back more, noting that the original statement was to look at three shared curb cuts. David Hart agreed noting that moving the houses would allow for room for the turnaround. • Page 1 of 3 c� • Walter Power suggested that the developer move the houses back, and put in sidewalks, and have three shared driveways. David Hart stated that he would be uncomfortable signing a plan tonight, knowing that they could walk out and build what ever they want. He stated that he would like to see them come back with a plan for a cluster. Walter Power stated that he would like to work with them on this. Kim Driscoll noted that the request before the Board is to approve a Form A, and if the plan meets the requirements, we should act on it. Motion made by Lee Harrington to approve the Form A for 127 Marlborough Road, seconded by John Moustakis and approved 7 - 0. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING -VILLAGE AT VINNIN Beth Debski stated that she has a request to continue the public hearing for the Village at Vinnin Square to December 18, 1997. She stated that they are working with the neighbors on the plan and have reduced the buildings from 4 to 3 and they will be five stories high and the plan has the full support of the trustees. She also noted that they have filed with the Board of Appeal and will be going there on December 17, 1997. • Motion made by David Hart to continue the public hearing for the Village at Vinnin Square to December 18, 1997, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. OLD / NEW BUSINESS December Meetings Beth Debski informed the Board that nothing has been filed for the December 4, 1997 meeting and suggested that we cancel the meeting. Motion made by Bill Cullen to cancel the Planning Board meeting scheduled for December 4, 1997, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. Pep Boys Site Kim Driscoll asked what the status of the Quick Kava and the Car Wash were on the Pep Boys site. Beth Debski reported that the foundation has been poured for the car wash and financing is pending for the Quick Kava. Page 2 of 3 There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this • meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. • The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB112097 • Page 3 of 3 Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, November 6, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, November 6,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, John Moustakis, Carter Vinson, Gene Collins, Chuck Puleo, Lee Harrington, and Bill Cullen. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. PROPOSED REVISIONS - FAFARD PHASE 3B AND 4 David Hart stated that he did not receive the packet for the meeting and since he was not able to review the material he was not prepared to vote on the matter this evening. Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and stated that they have revised the plan to show the changes as requested by the Board at the last meeting. Preston Hall explained the changes to the Board. He explained that they plan to realign the phase line between phases 3B and 4 to follow a natural ravine in • the land. He stated that there are no additional units being proposed in either phase. Mr. Hall explained that the changes in the recreation area have been redesigned to allow for a "step" midway up the hill which will be landscaped and will help break up the proposed steep slope. He noted that this would allow for more of the crown to be used for recreational space. Carter Vinson noted that some of the roads in the development have a circular flow within the site and asked if the realignment of the phase line would have any effect on that. Mr. Hall stated that the road would essentially remain the same. He also stated that there would be not net change in the number of curb cuts. Walter Power questioned why they wanted to get more recreational space on the ravine. Mr. Hall stated that what drove this decision was the benching of the land would allow for more landscaping. Carter Vinson questioned if there would be significant more liability risk with this plan than with the original plan for the vista. He suggested that they should confirm that with the insurance company that there is not more of a risk. • • w • Bill Cullen stated that the Planning Board forced them to include the ravine in the plan and now they are coming in with a better design and he sees no problem with it. He noted that if someone is going to get hurt they will, and the Board can't create something that is fool proof. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the revision to the plan, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved 6 - 1 with Carter Vinson opposed. PUBLIC HEARING -WETLAND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT -VAN WATERS & ROGERS Atty. John Serafini Jr. addressed the Board and presented plans for a Wetlands Flood Hazard Special Permit for Van Waters & Rogers. He noted that the Board approved the Site Plan Review Special Permit for the project and the Conservation Commission issued an Order of Conditions on October 23, 1997. Atty. Serafini reviewed the plans with the Board. He noted that there would be no impact on the wetlands or the flood zone. Mike Juliano addressed the Board and explained the locations of the wetlands on the plan. He noted that they are upgrading the drainage system with catch • basins and sumps and increased the size of the pipes. Walter Power asked if they used the 100 year flood for the plan. Mr. Juliano stated that the area is zoned B so that they use the 500 year flood plan. David Hart asked to have the Order of Conditions for the Conservation Commission reviewed. Chuck Puleo asked if they had an alarm system for the tanks in the event that they should leak. Mr. Juliano explained the plans and procedures that they have in place in the event that they have a spill. The Board reviewed the draft decision for the plan. David Hart requested that the Site Plan Review approval and the Conservation Commission Order of Conditions be included in the decision. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit for Van Waters & Rogers, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. • • REQUEST TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING -VILLAGE AT VINNIN SQUARE Beth Debski stated that she has received a request from Stephen Zeiff to continue the public hearing to November 20, 1997. Motion made by Bill Cullen to continue the public hearing to November 20, 1997, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. OLD / NEW BUSINESS Partial Release of Covenant - Calumet Street Beth Debski addressed the Board and stated that Philip Singleton has requested that the Board release a portion of the funds that are being held by the bank to insure the completion of improvements to the Calumet Street Subdivision. She stated that they $9,000.00 being held was to cover the installation of street trees and grass strips. She stated that the trees and the grass strips have been planted and are doing well, however, some of the trees need to be restaked prior to winter. Beth stated that the Planning Department recommends that $7,000.00 be released at this time and $2,000.00 be held to cover the cost of restaking the trees and the possible replacement of the trees if necessary. • Motion made by John Moustakis to release $7,000.00 from the Calumet Street Subdivision covenant, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB110697 • I 0 • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, October 16, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, October 16,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter Vinson, Gene Collins, Kim Driscoll and Bill Cullen. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. FORM A - 127 MARLROUGH ROAD Atty. Jack Keilty addressed the Board and stated that the Furnari's have a buyer for the property located at 127 Marlborough Road which the Board previously approved a cluster subdivision for 13 lots. He explained that the buyer has found the plan to cost prohibitive and he is proposing a plan for 6 lots each having 100 feet of frontage on Marlborough Road and greater than 15,000 s.f. of lot area. Atty. Keilty explained that the applicant is mindful of the Board's concern about • the number of curb cuts on Marlborough Road. He stated that they are proposing three curb cuts with one shared driveway for two houses. Carter Vinson questioned if they were representing to the Board that the lots have 15,000 s.f. of frontage all in the R1 district. Atty. Keilty stated that they are presenting under the frontage required by the R1 district. Carter Vinson stated that if they are using too much of the RC district they should use RC frontage requirements. Atty. Keilty stated that they would do the calculations and report to the Board at the next meeting. Kim Driscoll requested that the plan show the curb cuts. Walter Power suggested that the shared driveways should have hammerhead turnarounds so that they can tum around and drive out to Marlborough Road rather than backing out on to it. David Hart asked that they give some consideration to setting the houses back further so that in the event that Marlborough Road is ever widened, the land will be available. Atty. Keilty stated that if they set the houses back further they fun into the Conservation area. • • Atty. Keilty suggested that they withdraw the application this evening and work on the concerns of the Board and present it again at a later meeting. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to allow the applicant to withdraw without prejudice, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. 10 - 14 LYNCH STREET - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SITE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and requested an amendment to the Site Plan Review Special Permit that was issued to Raymond Falite on April 26, 1996. He explained that 11 apartment units have been completed and all of the units have been rented. He noted that they have a waiting list of 40-50 families and the project has improved the neighborhood. Atty. Correnti stated that his client is proposing to add another unit in the basement next to the laundry/storage facility. He stated that they plan for a two bedroom unit that will most likely be a managers unit. Carter Vinson questioned why they didn't apply for the 12 units when they got the original approval. Atty. Correnti stated that at the time they thought that they would need more storage space and with the demand for the units as they are, • they now feel that they have enough storage space and room for another unit Carter Vinson recalled that when the original approval was granted lighting was a concern. Atty. Correnti stated that the lighting was done in compliance. Walter Power suggested that they use a double partition for the wall next to the laundry room. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to approve the additional unit for 10 - 14 Lynch Street as submitted on the revised plan, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved 6-0-1 with David Hart abstaining. FAFARD PHASE 3B/4 REVISIONS Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and explained that they are requesting that they be allowed to relocate the phase line between phases 3b and 4. He stated that the proposed revision is that buildings 159 and 160 be moved from phase 4 to 3b. He noted that the reason for this is that there is a natural ravine which exists between units 159 and 160 which makes a natural break between the two phases. • Preston Hall addressed the Board and explained that this change would eliminate the problem of the condo associations deciding who should maintain • the area. This way they will each have to maintain their own. He showed the Board an overlay on the old plan to show the changes to the plam. Harry Mack addressed the Board and stated that they have redesigned the vista and are proposing to bench it and establish a landscape rather than to have it at a 45 degree angle. He stated that it would be much safer and the fence would still be along the top. Carter Vinson questioned where they stood in terms of the conditions of phase 3b. Atty. Correnti stated that they are selling the units. Harry Mack reported that they have finished the sidewalk on Whalers Lane and the trees have been planted. Walter Power stated that he would like to think about the changes to the vista. Carter Vinson stated that all he saw was a drawing and not a revised plan and he would like to see a revised plan before he votes on the matter. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to continue the matter to the next meeting on November 6, 1997, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. • REQUEST TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING Beth Debski stated that she has received a request from Stephen and Jim Zeiff to continue the public hearing for the Village at Vinnin Square. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to continue the public hearing for the Village at Vinnin Square to the next regular meeting, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. OLD / NEW BUSINESS Walmart Beth Debski stated that they have made excellent progress on the agreement for the roadway. Board of Appeal • • Beth Debski reported that Nina Cohen has requested that the Planning Board and the Board of Appeal get together and suggested dates of November 13, or December 11. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB101697 • • w � rn '/ Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, September 18, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 18,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter Vinson, John Moustakis, Gene Collins, and Bill Cullen. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. FORM A - STATION ROAD - Francis Murphy Beth Debski addressed the Board and stated that the Murphy's are requesting approval of a Form A to convey a parcel containing approximately 1,200 s.f. from two existing lots within the approved Station Road subdivision. She explained that the Murphy's have been using this lot for a number of years as a gardening area, and have come to an agreement with Mr. DiBiase to purchase this piece of land. She noted that the two lots within the subdivision will still have the requisite amount of frontage and lot area and she recommends endorsement of the plan. • Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the Form A for Station Road, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW-WALMART Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and reported that they have reached an agreement with the Directors of Camp Lion for the proposed access road between the shopping areas. He stated that the agreement may be in the form of a license and noted that they are working closely with them to have an agreement soon. He also noted that Rocket Management has been very cooperative and the owners of the Rich's property have been very receptive to the idea. Carter Vinson asked if there were any problems with the parking because of the road. Atty. Correnti stated that there are minimal changes to the footprint but no other changes are proposed at this time. He stated that the engineer is still negotiating the final plan on the roadway so it is difficult to estimate the loss of spaces at this time. • David Hart questioned what type of commitment the parties have agreed to. Atty. Correnti stated that the Rich Family Trust and Rocket Realty are both the land owners and they are in the process of working out the details. He also • noted that Walmart has made a financial commitment to do this. Carter Vinson asked what type of license would they be using for the approval. Atty. Correnti stated that it would be a twenty year renewable option and would run with the land. Carter Vinson stated that it was not at all binding language and he was not comfortable voting on the project as it is. Walter Power stated that the parties are acting in good faith to negotiate it and it has been made a condition that the final design of the road shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Beth Debski reviewed the draft decision for the project. Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. City Councillor Tom Furey addressed the Board and stated that he supports the idea of a shared road between the two shopping centers. He stated that he felt that it was a creative idea on the part of the Planning Board. Mike Rocket of Rocket Realty addressed the Board and stated that they have negotiated in good faith and that he believes that the road will be built. • Paul Sudenfield addressed the Board and requested that they approve the project. He stated that Walmart has been very cooperative with him and he has no problem with the project. Carter Vinson asked if trucks would be using the access road. Atty. Correnti stated that the access road would be used for customer traffic only. There being no further questions or comments on this matter, a motion was made by John Moustakis to close the public hearing, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the draft decision for the Walmart project, seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING -SITE PLAN REVIEW-VAN WATERS & ROGERS 0 Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and recalled that at the last meeting • there was concern about the noise levels of the roof top equipment. He reported that they have performed sound studies on the site. He noted that the fans will run intermittently throughout the night for proper exhaust and circulation in the building. He stated that the noise would be about 7 db over ambient. Carter Vinson stated that at the nearest residence he would like to see the db not exceed 3. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be comfortable with that as a condition. Carter Vinson asked when they would measure that and suggested that they be required to perform a sound test within 90 after the completion of construction. Atty. Correnti stated that he would rather they be required to perform the test if there are any complaints from the neighbors. Carter Vinson clarified that all he was looking for is for them to turn off the fans and measure the sound and turn them back on and measure it again when the service is in place. Gene Collins stated that he felt that there was no need to put that burden of the expense on the developer unless there is a problem. Bill Cullen agreed that if the neighbors have a problem after the completion of the construction then they should address it. He stated that he was uncomfortable putting that kind of expense on the developer when he is improving the area. • Carter Vinson stated that the condition is going to change to 3 above ambient level. He questioned how the parties would file a complaint. Beth Debski explained that the Board of Health enforces the noise ordinance and they use state regulations as a guideline. Bill Cullen asked if there have been any cases in the past where the neighbors have complained of noise from the roof top fans. Beth Debski stated that she could not recall any, and noted that there have been no complaints from the neighbors at Pep Boys and there are residents close to that location. She also noted that this neighborhood has a train that goes by that is louder than these exhaust fans would be. Q fi5b m/ ,v���lnu/ David Hart recommended that the Board have a cqiditio t19the applicant agrees that the rooftop equipment will not exceedl3 ambient during the early morning hours of June 1 - September 30, 1998. Atty. Correnti stated that the condition is assurance by the applicant that they will adhere to the wishes of the Board. Beth Debski reviewed the draft decision with the Board. • Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. Kevin Talbot of 160 Ocean Avenue addressed the Board and requested that he • be given the safety data sheets on the chemicals being stored on the site. Atty. Correnti stated that he would forward them to him. He also noted that they are on file with the Fire Department and they are public record. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Site Plan Review for Van Waters & Rogers, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. OLD/NEW BUSINESS Beth Debski reported that a joint public hearing with the City Council needs to be scheduled for the proposed zoning amendment to allow the construction of personal wireless service facilities has been scheduled for October 1, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. She noted that John Keenan has been working on this and if adopted it could mean revenue for the city. Review of the Master Plan Walter Power stated that the preamble that the Board requested was written by David Hart and asked if all of the members have had time to review it. There being no further questions or comments regarding the Master Plan a motion was made by Bill Cullen to approve the Master Plan as amended by the Planning Board, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. • There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB091897 • Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, September 4, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, September 4,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter Vinson, John Moustakis, Gene Collins, and Bill Cullen. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW-VAN WATERS & ROGERS - COLONIAL ROAD Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and stated that since the last meeting the Board has conducted a site visit and they have addressed the concerns that were raised at the last meeting. As requested he showed the Board a photograph of the area. Kurt Johnson addressed the Board and recalled that there was some concern about fencing and stated that they have addressed that. They now plan to install a fence at the base of the bluff area to the base of the building. He also • stated that they plan to repair areas of the fence that are in need of repair. Walter Power expressed concern about the open gate at the rail road tracks, noting that he saw someone walking through there during the site visit. Atty. Correnti stated that they now have an agreement with the rail road to close that gate. Walter Power questioned if they plan to clean up the trash that has been dumped in that area. Atty. Correnti stated that they do plan to clean that up and if necessary install a fence to prevent the dumping that has been going on. Mr. Johnson stated that the second issue of concern was the roof mounted equipment and the impact of the noise on the neighbors. He explained that they have two types of units on the roof. One is a heating unit and the other is an exhaust fan which is used to move the air through the building. He stated that they would not be used together, and most likely would not be used at night. He explained that there are 15 units total and they would be mounted towards the back of the building. • • Mr. Johnson explained that there are 7 exhaust fans and they have done some studies on the noise levels of them. He reported that in the summer there would be a db of 8 and noted that they would not be operating at night. In the winter the db would be 3. Carter Vinson questioned if the Planning Board could condition the use of the fans at night. Atty. Correnti stated that since the operation is closed at night there is no need to use the fans. Walter Power requested that the lighting plan be explained. He questioned if they plan to add any lights around the perimeter. Mr. Johnson stated that they have not planned to do that. Chuck Puleo asked if they plan to change any of the utilities. Mr. Johnson stated that they plan to move a utility transformer but that will have no impact on the site. David Hart questioned if the security fencing plan depicts what is there now. Mr. Johnson stated that the plan shows what will be there at the completion of phase 3. Walter Power opened the meeting up to public comment at this time. Kevin Talbot of 134 Ocean Avenue addressed the Board and expressed his • concern that they are moving the chemical storage facility closer to the residences in the area. He also stated that he is concerned about the noise from the roof top units, noting that they have noise from the trains now. Mr. Johnson stated that the roof top units will not be used at night and they should not add to the noise level. He also stated that during the day they should find that there will be a normal level of noise from the use of the fans and he does not believe that they will see a change. Kim Lapham of 160 Ocean Avenue addressed the Board and expressed her concern about the aesthetic view from her property. She also stated that she is concerned about taking trees down. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be willing to work with the neighbors on the landscaping, noting that they want to be good neighbors. He stated that once they clean up the area he feels that the neighbors will be pleased with it. Carter Vinson encouraged them to come to an agreement with the neighbors on their concerns. • • Don Hess of 135 Ocean Avenue addressed the Board and questioned what kind of chemicals will be stored in the tanks and if they are flammable. Atty. Correnti stated that there would be no change in the materials that have been stored there. He explained that they are a combination of food additives and flammable and non flammable chemicals. He also noted that they have been working with the fire department on the location and the removal of the tanks and they are in compliance with all regulations. Mr. Hess also stated that he was concerned about kids getting into the tanks. Atty. Correnti stated that the security system would prevent kids from getting into that area. David Hart questioned if the Fire Department would review the plans. Beth Debski stated that the Fire Department and the Building Inspector have worked closely on this plan. There being no further questions or comments regarding this plan this evening, a motion was made by John Moustakis to continue the public hearing to September 18, 1997, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW-WALMART Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and stated that at the last meeting some issues that were raised were footprint of the building and the possible • connection of the two shopping centers with an access road. Atty. Correnti stated that there would be no change in the footprint of the building and the other stores on the site would be remaining. He stated that the proposed addition of the garden center would be constructed on the Lynn side of the building. He stated that no other changes to the facade would be made. Atty. Correnti stated that with regards to the access road between the two shopping centers, they have contacted Rocket Realty and Camp Lion and the discussions are making progress. He stated that they are in the process of obtaining easements and they would like to have that finalized by the next meeting. Carter Vinson noted that there is a drop between the properties and questioned if that would have an effect on parking. Atty. Correnti stated that they would lose some parking spaces on both sides, but until they get a final plan he does not know how many spaces would be lost. He estimated that Walmart could lose 15 spaces. Walter Power stated that the access road would encourage shared parking and that should be an attraction to Walmart. Atty. Correnti stated that they would have to get an agreement with both owners on the over flow parking issue. Chuck Puleo questioned if they plan to use the parking spaces behind the • building. Atty. Correnti stated that those spaces would be used for employee parking. • Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. Paul Sudenfield, owner of Meineke Muffler addressed the Board and stated that he supports the project. He stated that they have worked well with the neighbors and he did have some concerns about the fencing and they took care of it. He stated that he feels this is a positive step for the neighborhood. There being no further comments or questions regarding this matter at this time, a motion was made by Gene Collins to continue the Public Hearing to September 18, 1997, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. OLD / NEW BUSINESS Shaws Renovations Carter Vinson stated that the Shaw's on Highland Avenue is doing some extensive renovations and questioned why they did not come to the Board for approvals. Beth Debski stated that Building Inspector Leo Tremblay issued the Building Permit and it should have go through site plan review because of the Entrance Corridor. Walter Power requested that a letter be sent to the Building Inspector indicating the Boards displeasure with the violation and that a copy • be sent to the Mayor and the City Council. Motion made by Bill Cullen to send a letter to the Building Inspector, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. Clark Avenue - Endorse Plan Beth Debski requested that the Board sign the mylar for the Clark Avenue plans that were previously approved. Form A - Hillside Avenue Beth Debski explained that a waiver from frontage was approved at the last meeting and approval of the Form A is now requested. She stated that endorsement of the plan is appropriate. Motion made by Bill Cullen to approve the Form A for 20 - 22 Hillside Avenue, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. Discussion of Master Plan • Beth Debski addressed the Board and explained that the Master Plan has been completed and the Mayor would like the Planning Board to endorse it. • Bill Cullen asked about the recreation and open space plan. Beth Debski noted that the Conservation Commission has reviewed that and approved it. She also stated that the other city boards and commission reviewed and approved the sections pertaining to them. Beth reviewed the highlights of the plan. Walter Power stated that he feels there is a glaring omission in the plan and that we need to consider unrestricted access to 128 and it should be in the plan over view. David Hart stated that he was the Planning Board representative on the committee and he would like to read the document before voting on it. He stated that he should have had this before the meeting if he was expected to vote on it this evening. Walter Power agreed and suggested that the members review it and vote on this at the next meeting. He stated that the Planning Board should not rubber stamp this. He stated that he wants to discuss ways to make the plan happen to insure that it does not sit on a shelf somewhere. Beth Debski suggested that the Board have a special meeting on September 11, 1997 to discuss the Master Plan. • There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Gene Collins and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB090497 • Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, July 24, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, July 24,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Carter Vinson John Moustakis, Gene Collins, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Kim Driscoll and Bill Cullen. Also present were City Planner Craig Wheeler, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. FORM A-MUSEUM PLACE MALL Atty. Scott Grover addressed the Board and explained that they are requesting approval of a Form A for the conveyance of parcels of land located within the Museum Place Mall from the owners of Museum Place to the Salem Redevelopment Authority, and from the SRA to Museum Place. He noted that the Board had previously endorsed this Form A plan, however, the parcels are registered land and new signatures are required in order to file the plan with the Land Court. • Beth Debski stated that there are no changes from the plan that was previously approved and endorsement of the plan is appropriate. The Board members signed the new plan. PUBLIC HEARING -WAIVER FROM FRONTAGE - 20 - 22 HILLSIDE AVENUE Beth Debski addressed the Board and explained that the applicant is requesting a waiver from frontage requirements for property located at 20 - 22 Hillside Avenue. She explained that lot 24 contains 19,851 s.f., with 81 feet of frontage. Lot 25 contains 17,873 s.f. with 60 feet of frontage. Sheexplained that there is an existing dwelling on lot 25 and there is a dwelling proposed to be constructed on lot 24. The applicant has received the necessary Variances from the Board of Appeal. The Planning Board reviewed the decision of the Board of Appeal. Bill Cullen stated that he felt that the plan looked in order. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the waiver from frontage, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - HAWTHORNE SQUARE MALL • J • Beth Debski addressed the Board and reported that since the last meeting she has been working with the City Solicitor and representatives of Fafard to resolve the outstanding issues regarding the easements for the future construction of the access road from the rear of Hawthorne Square Mall to First Street. She noted that Assistant City Solicitor John Keenan has sent a letter to Traveler's Insurance Company placing a demand on the $120,000 bond that was posted by Fafard for the roadway construction. Beth also stated that she sent a draft Grant of Easement to Fafard for their review and approval and that is has been approved by Fafard. She stated that this was reviewed and approved by John Keenan. The Board reviewed the draft decision for the project. There being no further questions or comments regarding this project, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to approve the site plan review for the Hawthorne Square Mall, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. • PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW- BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL PERMIT -WALMART Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and presented plans for the renovations to the former Rich's property on Highland Avenue by the Walmart Corporation. He stated that they are planning very few changes to the existing building and site. He explained that they are planning to install new light fixtures to the parking area and construct a 3,000 s.f. garden center at the end of the building, and a snack bar / restaurant will be constructed within the building. Atty. Correnti also noted that the plans call for the parking area to be slightly reconfigured, and the building will be painted and new signage will be installed. Walter Power stated that he is concerned about the increase in traffic on Highland Avenue and suggested that they see if an access road could be constructed to adjoin Walmart with the mall at 400 Highland Avenue. Atty. Correnti stated that they have done traffic studies and the numbers do not show • that there will be that much of an increase in traffic. He stated that they will J • contact the owners of the mall and see if they can work on the necessary approvals for a road that connects the two shopping centers. Lee Harrington stated that he can't see how the traffic would not be significantly increased from the traffic generated by Rich's. He noted that Walmart is a much bigger store. Carter Vinson asked if they had any information on the HVAC equipment that will be used. Atty. Correnti stated that they will be using the existing equipment on the site. He explained that the condition of the building required very little upgrading and there is little that needs to be replaced. He noted that they are upgrading some lighting in the parking area. Carter Vinson stated that he would like to have site visit before the next meeting. Beth Debski stated that the applicant needs to go the Board of Health and that is scheduled for September 9, 1997, so they would not be coming back to the Planning Board until September 18, 1997. The Board scheduled a site visit for Saturday, August 23, 1997 at 2:00 p.m. There being no further questions or comments on this proposal at this time, a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to continue the public hearing to September 18, 1997, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. • PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW-VAN WATERS & ROGERS Atty. John Serafini Jr. Addressed the Board and reviewed the history of the property. He stated that Van Waters & Rogers has been conducting business at its present location on Colonial Road since 1989. He recalled that the site is the former Hamblet and Hayes Company location. Atty. Serafini explained that the Van Waters and Rogers purchases packaged food additives and other chemical products in bulk which are stored on the site in various buildings. He stated that there are bulk liquids which are stored in a number of permitted tanks. The products are shipped throughout New England. Atty. Serafini stated that the proposed project will significantly increase the operational efficiency of the company. He explained that the process of receiving, storing and repackaging of materials occupies six scattered buildings on the site. They propose to consolidate this operation into a single • site to enhance productivity and provide a safer work environment. He also • note that proposed facility modifications will meet or exceed current building and fire code requirements. Atty. Serafini stated that there are presently 20 permitted underground chemical storage tanks on the site and are located beneath the pavement of buildings C, D, and E. The federal government has mandated that tanks of this description must be removed by the end of 1998. As part of this proposal the tanks will be removed and replaced with an equivalent capacity of tankage built above ground at the southern end of the property. He explained that there would be several vertical tanks and others that will sit horizontally. Kurt Johnson, the architect explained the details of the plan. He stated that the proposed project involves three existing buildings, shown as buildings C and D on the Hamblet and Hayes property and the large Cressey Dockham building on the plan. He stated that buildings C and D will be demolished in order to open up the area for improved vehicular circulation, and an enlarged truck court and landscaping. He also explained that the Cressey Dockham building is to be reduced and reconfigured to serve the consolidated operation as follows: a. The 4,340 s.f. office building attached at the southern end is to be removed • b The 61 ,500 s.f. L-shaped warehouse comprising the north and much of the eastern elevation of the existing structure is to be removed, resulting in an 84,000 s.f. warehouse to be upgraded for long term use. c A new 5,600 s.f. Office Building is to be constructed contiguous with the northeast corner of the "reduced configuration" warehouse. d A new above ground bulk liquid storage facility is to be constructed in a fully contained concrete basin at the south end of the warehouse. This facility will replace the existing underground storage tanks that are required to be removed by the end of 1998. Carter Vinson asked if they had any information on the HVAC rooftop units that they propose. Mr. Johnson stated that he would provide that information at the next meeting. He estimated that the nearest residence is about 150 feet from the closest unit. Carter Vinson stated that the Board may request a sound test to be performed on the site. John Moustakis questioned how many shifts VWR has. Attt. Serafini stated that they have one shift from 7 a.m. - 6 p.m. John Moustakis asked what kind of equipment would be running at night. Atty. Serafini stated that air conditioning units would be used to keep things constant. Is • Walter Power expressed concern about the possibility of contamination should the tanks leak. Atty. Serafini stated that they would have the capacity to clean up spillage and noted that they do not store a lot of stuff that would rupture inside. Walter Power read comments from other city boards and commissions. . The Building Inspector requires more information. Atty. Serafini stated that they have been meeting with the Fire Department during the planning process and the design. He stated that the they have reviewed and approved the first phase of the project, which is the removal of the building and the internal improvements. He noted that phase 2 of the project is the removal of the tanks. Kim Driscoll asked what the Conservation Commission status was. Atty. Serfini explained that there is a small stream in the area the area where they are planning to take down the building could fall under the new rivers protection act. Walter Power stated that he would like some information regarding the sight lines of the HVAC units with regards to the neighbors. He also requested a topo map showing the existing houses. • Chuck Puleo stated that there is an abandoned rail road bed there and asked if that would remain. Atty. Serafini stated that they have no plans to do anything to the rail road bed. Bill Cullen noted that the applicant came to the Board well prepared and he hoped that the requirement of noise testing would not hold them up. Bill Cullen asked how many trucks would be entering the site per day. Atty. Serafini stated that about 15 trucks would enter the site a day. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter at this time, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to continue the public hearing to September 4, 1997, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. OLD / NEW BUSINESS New England Power Company Tax Agreement City Planner Craig Wheeler addressed the Board and gave an overview of the Tax package that Mayor Harrington has worked out with New England Power. Form A - City of Salem Canal Street • • Beth Debski explained that the City has purchased the Rail Road Right of Way from Gilford Transportation for the bike trail and approval of the plan is appropriate. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to approve the Form A, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk P8072497 • • • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, July 10, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, July 10,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the Carfetorium at the Bentley School, 25 Memorial Drive, Salem, MA. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter Vinson John Moustakis, Gene Collins, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Kim Driscoll and Bill Cullen. Also present were City Planner Craig Wheeler, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW SPECIAL PERMIT / WSP -VILLAGE AT VINNIN SQUARE - PHASE 4 Atty. John Serafini Sr. addressed the Board and stated that at the last meeting they agreed to test the units of the residents who are experiencing water pressure problems in the Village at Vinnin Square. He noted that the City Engineer inspected the units at the highest elevations and he is here this evening to report his findings. • City Engineer Stanley Bornstein addressed the Board and stated that he has inspected the units of those residents of the Village at Vinnin Square who have been experiencing water pressure problems. He stated that in each of the units he inspected he removed water saver devices from the shower heads which would account for the poor water pressure that they have been experiencing. He noted that water saving devices are recommended for water conservation purposes, however in this case they are inhibiting the water pressure especially in the units with the high elevations in this development. He showed the Board a sampling of the devices that he removed from the units. Fire Chief Robert Turner was also present to discuss the results of the hydrant testing which he was present for. He stated that the hydrant testing that was performed on May 12,.1997 indicated that there is sufficient quantity and pressure to support the additional development proposed. David Hart noted that the sprinkler system is subject to certain rules and regulations and he would like to be sure that the water system can accommodate that as well. Atty. Correnti stated that Mr. Zeiff has both a wet and dry smoke alarm system in the buildings. David Hart stated that he would like documentation that the water system that feeds the sprinkler system is up to code. • Stanley Bornstein stated that the spurs from the main line up to the buildings and the laterals to the main were all flowing well. He did note that some grease was detected, but overall the entire main system was adequate. Walter Power noted that there was early testimony that there was a blockage. Mr. Bornstein stated that it may have been blocked at one time and might have been cleaned. Bill Cullen noted that city ordinance requires that the sprinkler system may be checked once a year by the fire department. Chief Turner agreed and stated that the engineering department tests the systems once a year. Mr. Bornstein stated that there are three depressions in the sewer pipe that needs to be fixed. He stated that it should be repaired before the construction of the project commences. He noted that the developer has agreed to do that. Atty. Atkins addressed the Board and stated that as requested he has provided a list of the unit owners who have experienced water pressure problems for the developer to test. Carter Vinson stated that he was confused as to what has transpired here since the last meeting and now. He questioned why the list was being presented tonight when it was requested prior to this meeting. He also noted that two memos were sent requesting the information well in advance of this evening. Atty. Atkins stated that they were unable to coordinate • between the organizations. Carter Vinson stated that he did not think it was fair that the developer would now have to incur the cost of a second inspection. Walter Power agreed noting that at the last meeting there were a number of people who addressed the Board informing them of their problems. He also noted that there is strong testimony that grease appears to be the culprit. Walter Power stated that he would expect that this list should be complete and asked if there was anyone present at the meeting who is not on the list that should be. Stanley Bornstein addressed the residents and stated that they should feel free to contact the city at anytime. He also noted that the water saver toilets need to be flushed two or three times and they should have no problem. Kim Driscoll expressed concern about the re-testing of the water pressure, noting that it is a waste of the Engineering Department's time and staff. Bill Cullen agreed noting that at the meeting on May 29, there were five or six people who complained of the problem and he is not sure that re-testing them will shed anymore light on what we already know. Mr. Bornstein stated that unless the problems are different from the ones that they checked today it is not going to make much difference. Atty. Atkins apologized for the delay that occurred but noted that they still have a • problem and the units should be tested. • Atty. Serafini stated that the developer has agreed to do the testing of the additional units and requested that the City Engineer be present for the testing so there is no question about the results. Mr. Bornstein stated that he would agree to that. Walter Power asked that we address the other issues that have been raised and thanked Stan Bornstein and Chief Turner for attending the meeting. Atty. Serafini stated that Scott Weiss from VHB was present to discuss the traffic concerns. Mr. Weiss addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting there were several traffic concerns. He noted that the intersection of Carol Way and Loring Avenue has been reviewed and additional field investigations have been made. He explained that brush and the ledge embankment block the view of the drivers and at the edge of the Kindercare driveway. He suggested minor brush removal and cutting the ledge 275 feet and that they should significantly cut and re-grade the entrance to Kindercare. He stated that this would increase the site line by 8 - 10 feet of what you can see coming out of Carol Way. Mr. Weiss reported that they looked at America Way and Weatherly Drive and he • reported that the roadway is 24 feet wide and is more than adequate to carry the 1000 vehicles that travel it in both directions. He suggested eliminating the curvature to make a safer alignment. He also suggested that they revise the access near the mail house to make it a better situation. Mr. Weiss stated that they looked at all of the issues and ways to improve what is there and these suggestions should enhance the area. Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. Marion Stutz of 50 Freedom Hollow Road addressed the Board and expressed concern about the speed limit. She stated that the speed limit is 35 miles an hour. Walter Power informed Mrs. Stutz that enforcement of the speed limit is the responsibility of the city to enforce and is not in the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. Sam Tuttman addressed the Board and questioned the traffic counts of 1991 that were done for the Swampscott Mall project. Atty. Serafini stated that the numbers that were counted were what was there, but they would be happy to check for any discrepancies. The stopping distances that were used were the ones that were recommended. Joan Borque of 50 Freedom Hollow addressed the Board and stated that Carol • Way is beyond the area that Mass Highway looked at. • Mr. Johnson of 38 Weatherly Drive addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the traffic counts. He stated that most families have two cars and wondered if that had been taken into consideration. He also noted that there is a school zone at the bottom of the hill and that there should be a SLOW sign painted on the street facade. Carter Vinson asked Atty. Correnti if he has filed with the ZBA yet. Atty. Correnti stated that they have not filed but they hope to do so soon. Carter Vinson stated that he would like it to be a requirement that they get their variances from the ZBA prior to Planning Board approval. Atty. Correnti stated that they anticipate going to the ZBA in September. Victor Cohen of 70 Weatherly Drive addressed the Board and noted that there has been no mention of vehicles of guests and they should be included in traffic counts. There being no further questions or comments at this time, a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to continue the public hearing to September 4, 1997, seconded by Carter Vinson and approved unanimously. The Planning Board scheduled a site visit for Thursday, July 17, 1997. • CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW- PETERBOROUGH OIL - 94 BRIDGE STREET Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and noted that at the last meeting the major issue raised related to access to the property from Bridge Street. He explained that in response to the issues that were raised the applicant has relocated the driveway to the center of the property on Bridge Street, which moves it about 40 feet from the corner of Pearl Street. Steve Kortorski addressed the Board and explained the changes to the plan. He stated that the moving of the entrance and the addition of some landscaping in the rear of the property were done in response to the concerns of the neighbors. He also noted that the signage was a concern of the neighbors and that will be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and the Sign Review Board. Chuck Puleo asked what the dimension of the sign would be. Mr. Kortorski stated that it would be about the same as the Coffee Time sign. Kim Driscoll stated that she thought that would be a good size for the neighborhood. Mr. Kortorski reviewed the traffic pattern on the site. He also explained the proposed enclosure for the dumpster. • • David Hart questioned the hours of operation for the HVAC units. Mr. Kortorski stated that the refrigeration units would operate more often during business hours. He explained the noise factors of the equipment and the level of noise is far below the ambient level. David Hart stated that he would like to see the specifications for the units. Eric Williams of 4 Pearl Street addressed the Board and noted that his wife attended the last meeting and addressed most of his concerns. He stated that he would rather see the sign on the far corner of the property, noting that he felt that the sign would impact more properties on the corner. Kim Driscoll suggested that the landscape architect in the Planning Department could make some suggestions about that. Chuck Puleo asked if the sign would remain lit at night. Mr. Kortorski stated that is would be shut off at night. Bill Cullen suggested that the Planning Board should leave the location of the sign to the Sign Review Board. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to close the public hearing, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. • The Planning Board reviewed the draft decision for the project. David Hart suggested adding a condition that states that the noise level of the HVAC units be no more than 50 db at the nearest property line. Motion made by Lee Harrington to approve the Site Plan Review Special Permit for Peterborough Oil, seconded by Bill Cullen and approve 8 -1 with Carter Vinson opposed. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW- HAWTHORNE SHOPPING CENTER Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board and stated that in response to the concerns raised at the last meeting a significant number of changes have been made to the plan. He introduced Jim McDowell of Eastern Land Survey to explain the changes. Jim McDowell explained that they have revised the entrance to Hawthorne Square from Highland Avenue. He also noted that they have opened up the access to the rear of the Shaw's Plaza allowing cars an alternative access route to Traders Way. He also noted that they have reconfigured the parking spaces along the entrance road to prohibit cars from backing up onto the • entrance road. • Beth Debski explained that she and Craig Wheeler have researched the Fafard PUD file and it is clear that the obligation to construct the rear access road is Fafard's She explained that Fafard posted a bond when the PUD was approved and the City can now call that in if we choose and build the road. Mr. Parachoke the owner of the Shaw's Plaza was present at the meeting and he stated that he is willing to work with the parties if it will benefit all parties involved. Beth Debski stated that if the road is built according to the plan with Fafard there would not be much that is needed from Mr. Parachoke. Carter Vinson stated that he felt that the changes to the plan are a tremendous improvement and he thanked the developer for being patient. Atty. John Serafini stated that the issues have been addressed and answered and he doesn't see any issues that need to be resolved. He stated that he hoped that they could get an approval at the meeting on July 24" . Carter Vinson stated that he would like to see something enforceable with regards to the building of the road that would be within the perview of the Board. Walter Power suggested that all parties come together and agree that the road will be built. He stressed that good circulation is needed around that property • and that they are trying to complete the vision of the PUD that was approved. He stated that he would like to see the bond an the information needed to enforce it by the 24th. He stated that it is a primary issue of this Planning Board to see that the circulation is effective and he views this as an overall planning issue. Bill Cullen stated that he has no problem with the road, but questioned if Market Basket pulls out of the project, what happens then, do we have the same problem all over again? Beth Debski stated that the road is Fafards responsibility as a condition of the PUD, so if Market Basket does not proceed, the road should not be affected. There being no further questions or comments at this time, Kim Driscoll made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to July 24, 1997, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. • FORM A - 15 - 17 CROSS STREET . Beth Debski stated that the Board approved a Waiver from Frontage to allow the property at 13 - 17 Cross Street to be subdivided into two lots on June 5, 1997. She explained that lot A contains 5,294 s.f. and 65 feet of frontage, and will house a new single family dwelling. Lot B, containing 5,096 s.f. and 78 feet of frontage, houses an existing duplex building. Beth explained that the twenty day appeal period for the Waiver from Frontage has expired and it is now appropriate to endorse the plan. Motion made by Gene Collins to approve the Form A for 15 - 17 Cross Street, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: • Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB071097 • J Salem Planning Board Q • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, June 5, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, June 5,1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter Vinson John Moustakis, Gene Collins, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Kim Driscoll and Bill Cullen. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING - WAIVER FROM FRONTAGE 13 - 17 CROSS STREET Mr. Mike McNiff addressed the Board representing Mr. William Attridge and explained that they are proposing to subdivide the parcel at 13 - 17 Cross Street. They are proposing to subdivide the parcel into two (2) lots to allow for the construction of a single family dwelling at 13 Cross Street. He noted that on March 19, 1997 the Board of Appeal granted a variance from lot size and frontage to construct the single family home, as well as a variance from lot size and frontage, side setback, and rear setback for 15 - 17 Cross Street. He noted that the lot known as 13 Cross Street has 65 feet of frontage, and 15 - 17 • has 78 feet of frontage. He also noted that there is an existing barn on 13 Cross Street which will be demolished. Mr. McNiff explained that the proposed house would be 32 X 24 feet, and they plan to install a fence on the side of the property near Eric Williams property. Carter Vinson asked if they plan to provide off street parking. Mr. McNiff stated that they plan for 2 parking spaces. Kim Driscoll asked if they would need any other variances. Mr. McNiff stated that they have been able to adhere to the to the front, back and rear setbacks and would not need any other variances. Lee Harrington stated that he thought that they would have serious rodent problems when they tear down the barn. Mr. McNiff stated that they would have an exterminator on site for the demolition. Bill Cullen noted that the average lot size in that area is 2,900 to 3,000, and this frontage is bigger than most of them in the neighborhood. • J • Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. Patricia Williams, a direct abutter addressed the Board and stated that she would like to see the plan. Walter Power invited her to the table to view the plan and Mr. McNiff explained the location of the proposed house and the fence which would be along her property. Mrs. Williams stated that she wanted to discuss the physical appearance of the house and said that she hoped that consideration would be given to the neighborhood. Walter Power informed Mrs. Williams that the style of the house was not in the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. Mr. McNiff stated that they are proposing a colonial house, which should fit in the neighborhood. Walter Power asked if they would be making another curb cut. Mr. McNiff stated that they would be closing the curb cut that exists now when construction is complete. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to close the public hearing, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Motion made by Carter Vinson to approve the waiver from frontage for 13 -17 Cross Street, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved 9 - 0. • PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW SPECIAL PERMIT- PETERBOROUGH OIL COMPANY - 94 BRIDGE STREET Atty. Joseph Correnti addressed the Board on behalf of his client Peterborough Oil Company for the property located at 94 Bridge Street. He explained that the proposal includes the demolition of the existing building, and removal of gasoline pumps to allow for the construction of a new 2,580 s.f. mini-mart building, as well as the installation of new gasoline pumps and canopy. Atty. Correnti noted that on April 16, 1997, the Board of Appeal granted a special permit to allow the enlargement of the existing non - conforming use and a change of use permit for the mini-mart in this location. Mr. Quigley reviewed the lighting plan for the site. He stated that it was a vast improvement over what is there now. John Moustakis asked what the hours of operation would be for the mini-mart. Mr. Quigley stated that they would be 5 a.m. to 11 p.m., which is a common time for businesses in that area. Bill Cullen asked when deliveries of gas would be made. Mr. Quigley stated • that they would be the same as they are now, explaining that they take 15 -20 minutes and are done during off peak times, twice a week. J • Kim Driscoll asked what the circulation of the cars through the site would be. Mr. Quigley explained the traffic circulation plan for the interior of the site. He noted that have sufficient movement on the site. He also noted that they have included a control for a one way flow of traffic on the site. Kim Driscoll suggested that they should look at reversing the direction of the driveway. Walter Power stated that he was concerned about the gas trucks entering from Pearl Street, notin that the turn is narrow. (�a am- David Hart ask d that they submit information on the HVAC units that they plan to use and the noise levek' hat *4 effect the neighborhood. Carter Vinson questioned what type of canopy they propose, and stated that,he would like them to push the location of the canopy back if possible. Walter Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. Ward Two Councillor Regina Flynn addressed the Board and thanked Mr. Hart and Mr. Peterson for their cooperation on this project. She noted that she has met with them several times regarding this plan and they have been open to the concerns of the neighborhood. She explained that they had originally • planned to have parking in the rear of the building, but they eliminated that due to neighborhood concerns. Mrs. Flynn also requested that they add one additional tree in the right hand corner of the property to shield the residents view. Paul Ward addressed the Board and thanked the developer for his cooperation as well. He expressed his concern about signage which would abut a neighbor. He suggested that they move the location of the sign to the center of the property rather than either corner of the property in consideration of the neighbors and their line of sight. Mrs. Williams of Cross Street addressed the Board and requested that they be required to have delivery trucks enter the site from Bridge Street. She also expressed concern about the limitation of visibility on the corner of Pearl and Bridge Street, and requested that they move the sign location. She stated that it is hard to see down Bridge Street, and the.sign would make it more difficult. Att. Correnti stated that the proposed sign will have clearance of 7 - 8 feet and the proposed shrubbery are only 3 - 4 feet high. He also noted that the deliveries of gas are quiet and do not take a long time. Walter Power questioned the location of the dumpster. He stated that he is concerned about the view of the neighbors and suggested that it should be • strategically located so at not to impose on the neighbors. Mrs. Williams stated that she would like to see them put a fence at the rear of • the property. Atty. Correnti stated that during discussions with the neighbors, some of them indicated that they would rather have the rear area green. Jack Shaprio of Lynn Street addressed the Board and stated that he felt that Peterborough Oil has been a good neighbor. He stated that his main concern is with signage, and he would like to see that the sign does not abut residential property. He stated that he would prefer the middle of the property, and if possible he would prefer that they not put a sign up. Carter Vinson asked if they plan to replace any sidewalks on Pearl Street or Bridge Street. Mr. Peterson stated that they have not planned for that and the existing sidewalks are scheduled to remain there. Lee Harrington stated that he felt that the project is a 100% improvement to the area. David Hart stated that he would like to see a plan that would show the site and the surrounding properties. Carter Vinson suggested that he would like a noise test performed from the nearest dwelling. Mr. Peterson stated that they would be shielded by a fence around it so the noise impact should be minimal. Atty. Correnti stated that they • would check the present ambient levels. There being no further questions or comments on the proposal at this time, a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to continue the public hearing to June 19, 1997, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW SPECIAL PERMIT - HAWTHORNE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER - HIGHLAND AVENUE Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board and recalled that at the last meeting the Board requested additional information on the interior traffic circulation. He introduced Bill Scully who explained the highlights of the report. He stated that they collected data on the internal traffic flow using manual turning movement/classification counts during weekday midday, weekday afternoon, and Saturday peak hours. He explained that the individual peak hours for each intersection were balanced where possible to provide consistency within the network. The observed traffic patterns within the site are typical for developments of this type. He noted that cross easements exist between the owners of each plaza giving patrons the right to use the roads of both plazas. • He noted that nearly half of the patrons from each plaza use the internal circulation roads. • Mr. Scully explained the alignment of the internal roads of both plazas was examined. He stated that the road on the Hawthorne Plaza side is approximately 420 feet from Highland Avenue, and is offset from the road on the Highlander Plaza side by 80 feet. He noted that alignment of these two roads raise several issues. First the RMD has no right to realign the Highlander Plaza Road, and moving it would cause problems to the Shaw's parking lot and restrict access to the other stores in the Highlander Plaza. He also noted that the Hawthorne Plaza road would cause substantial problems with the parking layout for Hawthorne Plaza. Mr. Scully concluded that with the current alignment of the roads traffic is forced to stop, preventing traffic from simply passing through as is the case in many parking lots. He suggested that at this time the realignment of the two roads is not recommended. Kim Driscoll stated that she felt it would be easier for drivers if the road was aligned since most people use both facilities. Bill Cullen stated that he likes the plan the way it is, noting that it would be safer. Carter Vinson questioned the arrangement of the parking spaces, noting that Shaws has landscaping in between the rows of parking. • Jim McDowell stated that they maximized the required parking versus the parking that they could take a look at. He stated that they have the required 771 parking spaces. Carter Vinson asked if there was any area where they could provide improvements to the site that the Board would like to see. Atty. Serafini stated that the shopping area was built in 1972 and the parking that is there is what was required at that time. He suggested that they would take a look at the parking with Eastern Land Survey and see what could be done. Carter Vinson noted that there is a strip of spaces along the entrance road which could be a safety issue for pedestrians. Atty. Serafini stated that those spaces currently exist and could be used for employee parking. Chuck Puleo asked to have the lighting plan explained. Jim McDowell explained the lighting plan and showed the location of the lights on the plan. He noted that the existing poles at the entrance would be replaced to match the new lamps. • Jim McDowell reviewed the traffic pattern and the route that deliveries would take. • A discussion was held on the possibility of a rear road leading to Traders Way and First Street. John Moustakis asked if the developer would be willing to make a portion of the land available for a road back there at some time. Atty. Serafini stated that to the extent that they are able to they would assist in any connection if the road is constructed. Walter Power stated that the plan is not acceptable to him without some form of egress in the rear of the property. He stated that he has been promised that road for twenty years now and the developer keeps says it will be in the next phase. Carter Vinson stated that two exits for two malls both on Highland Avenue is a concern. Atty. Serafini stated that a lot of time and money has been put into this development and they are not able to address access over to First Street at this time, but it should be addressed during further development. He stated that they would be willing to work with the Board to see what they can do with the other owners of the property. Walter Power stated that the owners should be good neighbors and work • together to provide the access road. Atty. Serafini stated that when the PUD for the area was designed it was designed so that the roads would handle all of the traffic at full buildout. Waler Power stated that he was concerned about the future development of Highland Avenue and we have a responsibility to take any measures that we can take to alleviate the congestion on Highland Avenue. Mr. Matthews presented the Board with a legal opinion stating that they are not obligated to provide an egress road in the rear of the property. Bill Cullen stated that he was not familiar with what has happened in the past regarding the discussion of the rear access road, but noted that he was aggravated to be presented with a legal opinion in the middle of a meeting. He stated that the developer should have given that to the Board before the meeting. • Motion made by Kim Driscoll to continue the public hearing to July 10, 1997, seconded by Gene Collins and approved 8 - 1 with Lee Harrington opposed. • There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Lee Harrington to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB060597 • • r a V • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, May 29, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, May 29, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the Cafetorium at the Bentley School, 21 Memorial Drive, Salem, MA. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, John Moustakis, Carter Vinson, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Kim Driscoll, Gene Collins, and Bill Cullen. Also present were City Planner Craig Wheeler, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW-VILLAGE A VINNIN SQUARE PHASE 4 Atty. John Serafini Sr. Addressed the Board and recalled that at the conclusion of the last meeting it was requested that the engineer DHB do more studies and get information for the Planning Board. He introduced Mr. Paul Sirois to adddress the Board and explain the studies that were done. Mr. Sirois addressed the Board and stated that they evaluated the water system and performed fire flow tests to determine the proposed unit impact. He • explained the results of the tests that were done. He concluded that an analysis of the total area indicates that there would be 348 gallons per minute. He stated that would be an increase of 156 gallons more with the new development, noting that there is sufficient water in the main. Walter Power questioned the flowage pressure, noting that many residents are complaining about the water pressure in the area. Mr. Sirois stated that 50-60 meets the guidelines. Carter Vinson noted that it was tested at the street, and that they should be abe to conclude that there is adequate water pressure in the buildings. He questioned if the impact could be in the plumbing, noting the size of the pipe and the elevation of the building. Bill Cullen questioned if the pressure of the water getting into the building could be corrected outside of the building and what could be done to correct the problem. David Hart noted that they stated that they measured the pressure from the street. He asked if they measured the pressure from any other elevation. Lee Harrington questioned the need for that, noting that they were called into • measure the impact that the new buildings would have. • Atty. Serafini suggested that the small group of neighbors who have problems could meet with the City Engineer and they would work with the people who have problems. The Board reviewed a letter from City Engineer Stanley Bornstein regarding the testing that was done. Mr. Bornstein concluded that the results of the testing indicate there is sufficient quantity and pressure to support the additional development proposed. He also noted that there is some concern voiced by residents about low water pressure. He noted that although he did not find this to be the case at the hydrant, but noted that it may be the case on the upper floors of the existing buildings. He suggested that this may be caused by water saving shower heads and toilets. Mr. Bornstein's letter also indicated that the entire length of the existing sewers (from building D to the 16 inch line) were cleaned and inspected using closed circuit TV. The results of the inspection are contained on 9 video tapes prepared my T. Mackey & Sons. He concluded that there is adequate capacity in the existing system to accomodate flows from the addition of phase 4 flows. He noted that they have identified a few areas from the tape that need to be repaired. These are minor in nature and should be repaired prior to the addition of any new flows. He recommended that the developer contact his office prior to making repairs. Mr. Bornstein also noted that his office and others have spent a considerable • amount of time and effort reviewing both the existing and proposed conditions of both the water and sewer systems in the area of the project. He noted that if the recommendations are followed and the project is constructed as shown on the drawings, the impact of the additional units should not be detrimental to either the water or sewer systems. Kim Driscoll questioned whether the line that was inspected was the pipe that the condo association refers to in their letter. Mr. Sirois stated that it was the same pipe. Lee Harrington questioned if the video was done on the pipes that go into the buildings. Mr. Sirois stated that the laterals going from the main to the buildings were not taped. Bill Cullen stated that he would like some information on the laterals and the mains going into the buildings at the next meeting. He also requested information on why the pressure is low and the sewerage backups. David Hart stated that we need an analysis of the laterals in terms of what the design is. The Board reviewed the traffic study. Mr. Sirois stated that they reviewed video tapes on the intersection of Carol Way and ways to increase site distance, and looked at the ability to exit on Carol Way. He stated that they hope to identify • some methods to improve these. Mailbox access was also discussed. • David Hart stated that they re in the process of compiling information, and suggested that while in th process of making further improvements to the roadway alignment that over what is there now. Walter Power requested that the City Engineer be invited to the next meeting to address these concerns so that the Planning Board will have a better idea of what problems exist. He also requested that the Fire Department be present also at that meeting. Carter Vinson noted that density is a concern. He asked Atty. Correnti if he has filed with the Board of Appeal yet. Atty. Correnti stated that he missed the June agenda and was hopeful to get on the agenda for July. Carter Vinson asked if the Board of Appeal refused the variance would they change the plan. Atty. Correnti stated that the plan would have to change if the variance is not granted. Carter Vinson stated that he is concerned that we would get to the end of this process and approve a hypothetical question. He stated that he would like to have them get their variance before the Planning Board decision is issued. Walter Power read a letter from Councillor at Large Stanley Usovicz into the record. • Atty. George Atkins addressed the Board on behalf of the residents of the Village at Vinnin and stated that there is a significant gap between reality the studies that have been presented. He stated that he endorses the questions of the Planning Board members. He stated that they have not seen the reports from the applicants and he requested that they be given copies of the reports. Atty. Atkins stated that he is not surprised by the answers and noted that the amount of people who are here this evening would not be here if they didn't have real problems. He noted that the sewer system may have sufficient capacity but they are still backing up. Atty. Atkins presented the Board with letters from the residents that address their concerns regarding the proposed new buildings. He stated that Site Plan Review allows the Board to look at the impact of a project on the surrounding neighborhood. Chairman Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. Ward Seven Councillor Mark Blair addressed the Board and those present and stated that the Planning Board knows that this many people would not turn out if they didn't have problems. He encouraged the neighbors to keep up the participation at the meetings. He also stated that he hoped that the applicant would get the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeal before the Planning • Board issues its decision. • Mr. Pulasky of 32C America Way addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the water pressure. He recalled that there was a fire three years ago at Loring Towers and the fire department told him at the time that the water pressure was insufficient. He also expressed concern about the traffic on America Way. Miram Stutz of 50 Freedom Hollow addressed the Board and stated that when she bought her unit she paid $5,000.00 more because it faced the pond. She stated that the developer promised her that the area would be untouched and it would be lovely. Mr. Stole of Valiant Way addressed the Board and stated that he was concerned about the traffic. He noted that the traffic from the nursing home is already a problem and this would add to it. Irving Stepenuk of 50 Freedom Hollow addressed the Board and stated that he is concerned about the traffic at Carol Way. He suggested a traffic light should be installed to help the problem. Shirley Cohen of 96 Freedom Hollow addressed the Board and expressed her concern about the entrances at Carol Way and Loring Hills Avenue. She stated that the sight lines are a problems and suggested that they should find a way to • improve them. James Tighe of Weatherly Drive addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the sewer system. He reported that they back up frequently. He noted that he was present when Mr. Mackey inspected the sewer system. Wilma Lander of 50 Freedom Hollow addressed the Board and invited the Planning Board to visit the site. She stated that they would get an understanding of the concerns of the people. Chairman Power stated that the board would be holding a site visit at some point during this process. Arnold Gitter of 20 Freedom Hollow Road addressed the Board and stated that the recreation facilities that are there now are inadequate and he is concerned about the increased use of them with more people using them. Irving Stepner of 50 Freedom Hollow also expressed his concern about the recreation facilities. Atty. Atkins stated that in closing he would like to say that these are real people with real concerns and issues. He thanked the Planning Board for listening to their concerns. • • Ally. Serafini requested that a list of the names of the residents and their specific problems be given to them so that they may review it with the developer. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter this evening, a motion was made by Carter Vinson to continue the public hearing to June 19, 1997, seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously. Walter Power informed those present that the Planning Board would be scheduling a site visit following the next meeting. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: i Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB052997 • • I Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting • Thursday, May 15, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, May 15, 1997, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the Library of Salem High School, Wilson Road, Salem, MA. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Carter Vinson, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Bill Cullen, and Kim Driscoll. Also present were, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN REVIEW- MARKET BASKET Atty. John Serafini Sr. addressed the Board and explained the project. He stated that his clients have plans to improve this shopping area and he felt that the Board would be pleased with the improvements. He stated that it would be a nice addition to the area. He introduced Jim McDowell who explained the layout of the site. Mr. McDowell stated that the plans would enhance the appearance of the site together with the building improvements. He stated that they plan to maintain the existing trees and add 45 new trees to the site. • Mr. McDowell explained that the lighting on the site would be redone and several new lights would be added in various locations. He stated that the parking area would be edged in concrete granite curbing. Cater Vinson stated that he thought it would be a tremendous improvement to the area and he looks forward to the upgrading of the site. Walter Power stated that he was concerned about the access to the site. He stated that he would like to see a rear access road and it appears on the plan that the present opening between Caldor and the Shaws Plaza will be closed off. He stated that he would like an access point for both malls. Atty. Serafini introduced tom Paulatano to explain the traffic study that was done. Mr. Paulatano stated that they were the traffic consultants for the Pep Boys project and they did an analysis of the existing conditions and the impact of the improvements. He stated that since there is not a proposed change in use, since the Stop and Shop was previously there. He noted that traffic counts for the supermarket would be higher on Saturday. Walter Power stated that he is concerned about the level of interaction on Highland Avenue getting into the site. Mr. Paulatano stated that he did not have • that information this evening but he would get it. John Moustakis asked if they had taken into consideration the cross over from • the Shaw's Plaza. Mr. Paulatano stated that they had not looked at the internal circulation, but they would. Cater Vinson stated that the run from Pep Boys to the Ground Round is not ideal and suggested that they take a look at that. He suggested access in the rear of the property towards Salem and on the other side towards Swampscott Road, rather than dumping all of the traffic on Highland Avenue. Walter Power agreed noting that the intersections are clogged and the Board needs to look toward several years from now when Highland Avenue is fully developed. He stated that we have to look at the whole site and the circulation. Atty. Serafini stated that he would follow up on that and they will submit a circulation plan in color so that the Board can see what they propose. Walter Power stated that he would like to see both plazas included. John Moustakis noted that the traffic study was done in March and that property has been mostly vacant. Mr. Paulatano stated that the analysis does include that and the retail development even though it is not occupied. Lee Harrington stated that he felt that the project would have a significant impact on the area roadways. He stated that he would expect them to offer • some solutions to the problems and criticized the presentation for not offering any proposal to solve it. Atty. Serafini stated that they would look at the site and what this developer owns and see what they can do, noting that he does not have control over the whole site. Gene Collins expressed his concern that the Board may be forcing them to work with other property owners outside of the realm of this project. Walter Power suggested that perhaps the site would not support what is there now. Atty. Serafini stated that they hired responsible people to do these studies and their information is reliable. Page 2 of 6 • Carter Vinson stated that it would be a mistake to look at this as a closed envelope that has been submitted. He noted that the Shaw's Plaza owner has • made significant improvements in that area. He suggested that they need to look at the adjoining parcels of property and explore steps to work on the site as a whole. Walter Power stated that there is no intention in this presentation that addresses the concerns of the Planning Board. He also noted that he would like to see that access behind Shaw's to get to Traders Way. Kim Driscoll questioned if the road adjacent to Caldor goes anywhere, and questioned if there was a way to get from Caldor to First Street or Traders Way. Atty. Correnti stated that there is a partial road there that can go to Traders Way, but does not lead to First Street. Bill Cullen noted that there is a parcel down behind Shaw's that is being considered for a new school. Beth Debski noted that the School Building Committee did look at a site, but no decision has been made. Walter Power suggested that they go back and look at the building again. He also noted that they should review the parking spaces as some could be replaced. He noted that they are going from 800 spaces to 771 spaces. Carter Vinson asked if the 770 spaces were required by zoning. Atty. Correnti • stated when the original shopping center was built, that was the required number of spaces at the time. Robert 0' Neil of Tech Engineering addressed the Board and reviewed the findings of the noise study. He stated that they used standard acoustic procedures. The study was done in early March. He stated that they used the sound level data from the new DeMoulas Market Basket in Rowley since this site is empty, and equivalent equipment is proposed for this store. He stated that the background noise would be 43 db when the new store is complete. Mr. Matthews addressed the Board and gave a brief history of the Market Basket chain. He stated that he has been project manager for a number of their projects and is currently overseeing the renovation to the Danvers store on Endicott Street. He stated that they have 57 stores and is one of the largest employers in Massachusetts. He noted that the store in South Nashua NH is the newest prototype. He explained the proposed renovations to the facade of the Stop and Shop building. He noted that there would be an addition to the front of the building to house carriages and a clock tower with a weather vane would comple the facade. He noted that they recently opened a new store in Lowell and showed pictures to the Board. Mr. Matthews stated that they are excited about the opportunity to come to Salem. • Page 3 of 6 Mr. Matthews stated that they have met with officials from Caldor and they are considering doing interior renovations to the store. He explained that they plan • to demolish some of the smaller buildings in the mall and provide better access around the buildings for deliveries. John Moustakis asked if there would be a bank in the Market Basket. Mr. Matthews stated that there would be an ATM machine. Lee Harrington asked if there would be a liquor store in the mall. Mr. Matthews stated that they have no plans for one. Carter Vinson asked how deliveries are handled. Mr. Matthews stated that they have their own warehouse system and do there own deliveries of groceries, produce, meat and frozen items. Some vendors deliver milk, bread, chips etc., at certain times of the day. He estimated that they have 25 truck deliveries per day, usually between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. He noted that the store hours would be from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Kim Driscoll asked to have the locations for the dumpsters and the snow storage areas identified on the plan. Jim McDowell reviewed the proposed locations for these with the Board. Bill Cullen asked if there would be any night time activity after the store closes. Mr. Matthews stated that they have a night crew that stocks shelves in the store, • but there would be no deliveries made at night. Walter Power read comments from other City Boards and Commissions. The Board of Health needs more information. The City Engineer concurs with the plan. The Building Inspector needs more information. The Conservation Commission has no jurisdiction on this site. Walter Power opened the hearing up for public comment at this time. Paul Stevens addressed the Board and questioned which businesses would remain on the site, since it looks like they plan to demolish 60% of the building as it exists now. Mr. Matthews stated that Fashion Bug, Radio Shack and the Laundromat will all be remaining. City Councillor Tom Furey addressed the Board and questioned if the economic viability of this project was good for the other businesses in the area. • Page 4 of 6 Ralph Cervillo, the owner of Hillcrest Chevrolet addressed the Board and stated that he felt that the project would be a positive addition to the Highland • Avenue area. There being no further discussion on this matter at this time, a motion was made by Kim Driscoll to continue the Public Hearing to June 5, 1997, seconded by Carter Vinson and approved unanimously. Continuation of Public Hearing - Site Plan Review - Station Road Extension City Planner Craig Wheeler updated the Board of the status of the project with the Conservation Commission. He stated that he and Walter Power and Beth Debski met with Fred Harney and Mark George of the Conservation Commission and they had a very productive meeting. Walter Power stressed the good of the project for the neighborhood. The Commission is firm on its stand for the setback requirements and the no cut zone, but he feels that it can be worked out. They should be issuing a decision soon. Craig Wheeler stated that Chuck Faia came to the last meeting with a plan that shows 10 lots and they will be changing that to show 11 lots. He noted that all of the drainage remains the same. He also noted that they have reviewed the pipe as requested and they have found it to be in good shape. He stated that the plan should help the overall flooding problem in the neighborhood. • Kim Driscoll questioned if the Conservation Commission has seen the plan with 11 lots. Craig Wheeler stated that Mr. Beatrice had withdrawn the plan from the Commission but they are now going back with the 11 lots. Beth Debski reviewed a draft decision for the project. Kim Driscoll requested that they be required to do street sweeping periodically throughout the project as deemed necessary by the City Planner. Mr. Beatrice expressed concern over the provision that no blasting can be done on Saturdays. Beth Debski stated that if it were necessary, a special permit could be granted for an occasional Saturday. Motion made by Chuck Puleo to close the Public Hearing, seconded by Kim Driscoll and approved unanimously. Motion made by John Moustakis to approve the Site Plan Review Special Permit for Station Road Extension, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved 8-0. • page 5 of 6 • CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING -VILLAGE AT VINNIN SQUARE PHASE 4 Beth Debski reported that she received a request from Atty. Correnti to continue the Public Hearing for the Village at Vinnin Square to May 29, 1997. Motion made by Kim Driscoll to continue the Public Hearing to May 29, 1997, for the Village at Vinnin Phase 4, seconded Lee Harrington and approved 8 - 0. OLD / NEW BUSINESS Bill Cullen noted that the pre-blast survey on Champlain Road was not done properly. Beth Debski reported that there were problems, and they have been corrected. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: • Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB051597 • • Salem Planning Board Minutes of Meeting Thursday, April 24, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, April 24, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green. Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, John Moustakis, Carter Vinson, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, Gene Collins, Bill Cullen, and Kim Driscoll. Also present were City Planner Craig Wheeler, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Chairman Power called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and announced that the Planning Board would be adjourning to Salem High School for the meeting. Motion made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting and reconvene at Salem High School at 8:00 for the Planning Board meeting, seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously. The Planning Board reconvened at the Salem High School Auditorium at 8:00 p.m. • Public Hearing - Site Plan Review - Village at Vinnin Square Phase 4 Chairman Power addressed those present and explained the process for this evening. He stated that the applicant will be allowed to present his project and there would be time in the meeting for the public to make comments. Atty. John Serafini Sr. addressed the Board and explained the history of the Village at Vinnin Square. He stated that the project has been under construction since 1984 and the owners have worked with city officials and the neighbors over the years. He stated that it is an attractive project. He noted that all of the units that have been built have been sold and it is now time to start phase 4. He noted that the developer has a great interest in the area and he has spent a lot of time and energy on the project. Atty. Serafini stated that the SPR process is to allow the parties to voice their concerns and to work out any problems that they may have. He stated that he was confident that the concerns of the residents could be addressed. He referred to a letter dated March 24, 1997 from the residents of the Village and he stated that they will address those concerns tonight and over the next few months. He introduced Mr. Richard Hollingsworth of VHB Associates to address the Board. • Page 1 of 5 • Mr. Hollingsworth explained the general description of the property. He stated that there are three distinct lots on three parcels that they wish to use. He noted that there is a Bordering Vegetated Wetland which has been identified, and reviewed the elevations of the site. He explained that they proposed to build 4 mid rise buildings for a total of 178 units. He also stated that they have conducted studies in conjunction with the city to improve the water and sewer facilities. He also noted that they plan to send a video camera through the pipes to investigate the sewer system. Scott Weiss of Vaness and Hagen addressed the Board and reviewed the results of their traffic survey. He stated that they looked at the Vinnin Square area as a whole. He explained that the Massachusetts Highway Department has plans to install a traffic light at Paradise Road and Loring Avenue, but no time table for that is available. Mr. Weiss explained that they looked at the busy time periods, morning, evening and commuter times. He reviewed the results of the traffic study that they did. He stated that the addition traffic would have a minimal impact on the area. He also suggested some improvements that could be made during the construction to improve the traffic, such as widening the exits along Carol Way. Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board and stated that the residents had a session with the developer on March 8, 1997 to view the plan and make • comments. He stated that this meeting is just the first stop in a series of stops along the way to approving this project. Chairman Walter Power read comments from other city Boards and Commissions. The City Engineer needs more information such as drainage calculations, a detail of the 12" water main and hydrant tests need to be performed. The Building Inspector concurs with the plan. Chairman Power read a letter from Ward Seven Councillor Mark Blair. Councillor Blair expressed his concern about the lack of water pressure, rain and snow runoff, and increased traffic. He requested that the Planning Board address the concerns of the neighbors. City Planner Craig Wheeler read a letter from Mr. Blonder stating his concerns about traffic. Chairman Power asked if the members of the Planning Board would like to comment on the project. Page 2 of 5 • Carter Vinson asked if they plan to file a new Notice of Intent with the Conservation Commission or are they using an existing order from the last phase. Atty. Correnti stated that they would be filing a new Notice of Intent with the Conservation Commission and they would be filing sometime in May. Carter Vinson stated that he would like to have a Conservation Commission decision before the Planning Board issues its decision. Lee Harrington asked for clarification of the traffic count, specifically how they got the additional 40 cars. Mr. Weiss stated that was a national average, noting that everyone doesn't drive at the same time. He explained his calculations and the distribution of traffic comes to a 2 _% increase over the present traffic pattern. He stated that they are in the process of looking at how many trips are taken and when they are made. Chuck Puleo questioned how many total units would have to access Carol Way. He also asked what the state time table was for the proposed traffic light at Paradise Road. Craig Wheeler stated that the 25% design has been completed and the design hearing has been scheduled with the Mass Highway Department. Chuck Puleo asked about the use of 25 spaces for the Nursing Home. Atty. Correnti stated that they currently use 25 spaces and they will continue to do so. • David Hart noted that there are issues regarding the water pressure and stated that at a future meeting he would like to see a site plan that shows the entire configuration of the village. Chairman Power opened the meeting up to public comment at this time. Atty. George Atkins, representing the Condo Association addressed the Board and stated that over time the project was built and smaller areas were left. He stated that there will be more impact on the existing units and there is a high rate of density in the area. He stated that the density calculations show that there is too much density for the size of the lots and presented a chart showing that. He also stated that the height of the buildings would be too much for the site. He stated that there are two buildings proposed for one lot which has a minimum lot area for one building. Atty. Atkins stated that the traffic impact would be more than minimal and that the units that are already there should be considered as well. He stated that there would be more traffic from the project. Atty. Atkins stated that they have serious concerns about the water pressure and the water flow. He suggested that they look at the pipes of the whole • development and not only the proposed new section. Page 3 of 5 • Atty. Atkins stated that selected residents will speak on behalf of the group Michael Stillman of 19 Freedom Hollow road addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the traffic, water pressure, and sewerage problems. He stated that there are blind corners on Carol Way and Freedom Hollow Road. He also noted that the access to the mail boxes is a concern. Dan Surette of 52 Valiant Way addressed the Board and expressed his concerns about the increased density in traffic and the sewer problems. He stated that they should protect existing systems that are in place now. Sam Tuttman of 50 Freedom Hollow Road addressed the Board and stated that he has lived there for eight years. He expressed his concerns about the traffic and the dangerous intersection at Carol Way. Timothy Daverri of 29 Weatherly Drive addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the water pressure, traffic, and the sewer problems. He stated that he is concerned that with the problems that exist today, the new buildings would add to them. Atty. Atkins stated that these speakers were representatives of all who are • present this evening. He stated that their concerns are real life instances and they need to be addressed. Frank Malionik of 16 America Way addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the accidents that occur near Carol Way. He also stated that he has problems with the water pressure. Charlie Spiliotis of 20 America Way addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the insufficient water pressure. He also stated that he is concerned about fire safety. He stated that the right of the developer to build should be consistent with the safety and the concerns of the people who live there. Carter Vinson asked when they plan to go to the ZBA for the variances that they need. Atty. Correnti stated that they hope to go in May. David Hart stated that if might be worthwhile to get that approval first, noting that the documentation might be helpful to the Planning Board. He also requested that he would like to see the original submission of the plans for the Village of Vinnin beginning phases at a future meeting. Page 4 of 5 • John Moustakis agreed that it would make more sense to get their approvals from the Board of Appeal before the Planning Board issues a decision. Walter Power stated that the Planning Board has a lot to cover and address for the project so he sees no problem continuing the process while they get their approval from the ZBA. There being no further questions or comments at this time, a motion was made by David Hart to continue the Public Hearing to May 15, 1997, seconded by Carter Vinson and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting a motion was made by David Hart to adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB042497 • • e J Salem Planning Board • Minutes of Meeting Thursday, March 6, 1997 A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday, March 6, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem GreO, CXSW Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, John kis, Carter Vinson, Lee Harrington, Chuck Puleo, and Kim Driscoll. Also present were City Planner Craig Wheeler, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. FORM A -63 BRIDGE STREET Atty. Jack Keilty addressed the Board and recalled that a Waiver from Frontage had been granted in February. He noted that Mrs. DeSantis, the owner of the property is merging the lots because a previous zoning configuration made the lots unusable. He stated that all of the lots have adequate frontage except for lot 1 which the Board granted the waiver from frontage for. There being no further questions regarding the Form A, a motion was made by Carter Vinson to approve the Form A for 63 Bridge Street, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. • CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING - CHAMPLAIN ROAD Atty. Jack Keilty addressed the Board and explained the history of the project. He noted that during discussions several neighbors were concerned about the continued use of the path that is traveled to St. Ann's Park. He stated that his client has some concerns about the marketability of the property should the path be included in his project, and the quality of life for the prospective buyers of the property. He stated that they have reached a tentative agreement with Mr. King to deed the property to him and he has indicated that he would grant personal easements to the neighbors for the use of the path to get to the St. Ann's Park. Atty. Keilty stated that they intend to offer parcel Z to the city. Walter Power questioned if that parcel was a buildable lot. Chris Mello stated that it was not a buildable lot. Atty. Keilty stated that they could add to the plan that it is not a buildable lot. Walter Power expressed his concern that since the lot is 19,000 s.f. it may have sufficient area. Carter Vinson stated that he would not like to condition the approval with a donation of land to the city. Chris Mello stated that they would add a note to the plan stating that parcel z is not a buildable lot because there • is not enough frontage and. area. Page 1 of 3 T • Bill Cullen suggested that he would like to see some kind of vegetation between the bounds of the Dennis property and lot A to help with the drainage and the view. Chris Mello suggested that arborvitae would be appropriate. He suggested that he would work with Juli Reimenschnider on the landscaping between the Dennis property and lot A. Atty. Keilty stated that he would send a letter to Ward 3 Councillor John Donahue offering the donation of Parcel Z to the City of Salem. Chairman Power opened the hearing up to public comment at this time. Dean Boucher of 13 Arthur Street, addressed the Board and expressed his concern about the safety of the kids in the neighborhood who use the path to get to St. Ann's Park. Carter Vinson asked if there were sidewalks in the area that the kids could use, noting that if there are sidewalks available for them to use, he does not want to ask the developer to keep the path. Mr. Boucher stated that the entrance to the park is on Story Road. Carter Vinson stated that he would be hard pressed to force a land owner to provide access over his property, noting that there are limits on what we can ask for in this process. He stated that having them put an easement down the middle of the property would affect the marketability of the property and would have great difficulty holding up in court without a value. • David Hart suggested that the Board could hold off on approval to see if the city is willing to accept the donation of parcel Z. Councillor Donahue stated that he would take the request to the City Council. Motion made by Carter Vinson to approve the Waiver from Frontage with the sole condition that the applicant will provide suitable vegetation to provide screening on Lot A as it adjoins the Dennis property, and the landscaping plan for that shall be reviewed by the Planning Department Landscape Architect, seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously. OLD / NEW BUSINESS Calumet Street Atty. Jack Keilty addressed the Board and asked for a partial release for the covenant for Calumet Street. He stated that the trees and the grass have been in and are doing well. He requested that the Board release $35,000.00 and keep $9,000.00 until the as built plans are submitted. • page 2 of 3 • 4� • Motion made by Carter Vinson to release $35,000.00 of the $44,000.00 that is left in the covenant, and the remainder that be kept until all landscaping issues have been solved, seconded by Bill Cullen and approved unanimously. Station Road Extension Beth Debski stated that she received a request from Chuck Faia to continue Station Road to March 20, 1997. She explained that he is working in eliminating the detention area and is looking at installing a 36 inch drainage pipe. She noted that the Engineering Department is working with him on the plan and it should help the whole area. She also noted that they may get approval from the Conservation Commission next week. Motion made by Carter Vinson to continue the matter to March 20, 1997, seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously. Other Old Business Carter Vinson noted that there are trucks parked on the Osram Site on Boston Street, and questioned if that would be a zoning issue. Beth Debski stated that Osco Drug has a Purchase and Sales Agreement for the property. She also noted that the Planning Department has made several calls to Osram regarding the trucks and they have not responded. • There being no further business to come before the Planning Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Bill Cullen to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Lee Harrington and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Eileen M. Sacco, Clerk PB030697 • 4bbl