1992-PLANNING BOARD (9i#V of ,Sttlent, Anssac4use##s
. � '.� y �lttttuittg �Darl
(Put Oulem (15reen
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting
scheduled for Thursday, December 17 , 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. in the
second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled.
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
EX\DH\CANCL121792
'rhia notice Dontad on "Offlolal Bulletin Board"
Wity Hall Ave . , Salem, Mase. on ,)C-C• �`/, i 992_
yt 3. 9/6 /'m in accordanoe with Chap. bm®.
of tke Acto of 1958. �y
O �1c°"vtG,
ltf2IlEItI� 2I�fiMC�IT!bES
(Otte .OalPnl (Arm
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting
scheduled for Thursday December 3 , 199'2 at 7 : 30 p.m. in the second
floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled.
W" (S7powP
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
EX\DH\CANCL123 . 92
This notice posted on "Official lletilY:Ba
vity Hall Ave. , Salem, Mase. on 41d 1) 30j N
o� s/he. ;�P 19 8 in 'accordance pith/Chap. Ggi.
. SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19 , 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, November 19, 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Linda Vaughan, Carter Vinson, David Hart,
John Moustakis , Chuck Puleo, and Kosta Prentakis . Absent were
Walter Power and Debbie Hilbert.
In the absence of Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan assumed
the chair.
DISCUSSION OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH CITY COUNCIL REGARDING
NEPCO - 24 FORT AVENUE.
Bill Luster addressed the Board and stated that he would
recommend that Planning Board send a letter to the City Council
stating that they have no comment on the matter. He noted that
it is unfortunate that water front would be zoned industrial,
but that there was no reason to comment and the Council would
just probably approve the rezoning request.
• Motion made by John Moustakis to send the letter to the City
Council, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously.
UPDATE ON OUTSTANDING PROJECTS
WOLFBORO PROPERTIES
Bill Luster informed the Board that he had discussed the issue
of the access road with Walter . He also noted that the owners
of the Shaw' s Mall and the owners of the Caldor Mall have been
having discussions about the Shaw ' s owners buying Caldors Mall.
He also noted that they have discussed the possibility of the
two malls being joined together. Bill Luster also noted that
Wolfboro Properties have been indicating that they want a
decision on the access road soon, but that he informed them
that the Board needs to see the traffic survey and that a
decision is not coming quickly. He also stated that the Planning
Board would have the opportunity for Site Plan Review should
major changes be proposed for the two malls . Bill Luster also
noted that he suggested to Bank of Boston that they have an
architect or an Atty. meet with the Planning Board on their
behalf. A study is being conducted by the Planning 'Department
regarding the outstanding PUD issues , before any agreement will
be made with Wolfboro Properties .
• Chuck Puleo questioned why the owners of the Caldor Mall would
allow all of the traffic on their road that uses it to go to
1
i
the Shaws Mall. Bill Luster stated that he did not think that
much thought went into that when the two areas were planned
just by looking at the set up of the two parking areas.
David Hart stated that he went to the Shaws Mall and noted that
without a plan it is hard to visualize where the road would
go.
Kosta Prentakis noted that it makes more sense to encourage
traffic onto Traders Way.
Chuck Puleo noted that Traders Way was not built when the access
road was proposed.
GREENLAWN AVENUE
Bill Luster reported that Greenlawn Avenue is coming along.
He stated that the granite is in, and that there is some concern
that the final coat of paving won't be in before the winter.
He also noted that the Clerk of the Works would prefer that
the final coat be done in the spring.
OLD BUSINESS
BERRYWOOD LANE
• Debbie Hurlburt reported that Walter signed the covenant and
the last meeting and that it was now up to them to proceed.
POPE STREET
Carter Vinson reported that he went to Pope Street, and noted
that the proposal is for something that has not been tried
before, and questioned whether the project is viable, given
the difficulties with the site. He asked what the Planning
Board could do. Bill Luster stated that the Planning Board
cannot turn down Site Plan Review, they can only condition it,
and suggested that they let them go through the process . David
Hart agreed that it was a tough site, but noted that it was
not impossible to do something. He noted that there would be
a lot of issues on drainage, and parking.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of June 4, 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the minutes
of the meeting of June 4, 1992 as amended, seconded by Carter
Vinson and approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of June 18, 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the minutes
• of the meeting of June 18, 1992, seconded by Carter Vinson and
approved unanimously.
2
.a
• The minutes of the meeting of October 1 , 1992 were presented
for approval. :lotion made by David Hart to approve the Minutes
of the Meeting of October 1 , 1992 , seconded by Carter Vinson
and approved unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Kosta Prentakis
to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 8 : 15 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB111992
•
• 3
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
.THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 51 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, November 5, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Albert Hill, Carter
Vinson, John Moustakis, David Hart, Kosta Prentakis, Linda
Vaughan, and Chuck Puleo. Also present were, City Planner
William Luster, Debbie Hurlburt and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
FORM A - 31 STATION ROAD
Atty. David Powers, representing Somerset Bank, addressed the
Board and requested approval of a Form A for a parcel located
at 31 Station Road. He explained that the lot was previously
part of a subdivision approved by the Planning Board in January
1974 and all of the lots except this one had been conveyed.
He Also stated that the bank had acquired the parcel in
forclosure proceedings. Atty. Powers explained that they need
the approval of the form A due to Essex County Land Court
requiring a more detailed plan on the boundary lines. He also
• noted that the lot has the required frontage and it is on an
approved public way.
Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the Form A for 31
Station Road, seconded by Linda Vaughan and approved unanimously.
FORM A - GREENLAWN AVENUE
Atty. John Serafini presented a Form A for approval for a parcel
on Greenlawn Ave. He explained that the subdivision was approved
by the Planning Board on September 17, 1992, and since then,
Mr. Finnichio, the owner has acquired the adjacent lot, and
this request changes the lot lines to make three lots. He showed
the Board revised plans, and explained the lot lines.
Motion made by John Moustakis, to approve the Form A for
Greenlawm Avenue, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved with
Carter Vinson, abstaining.
HOUSE OF SEVEN GABLES DECISION
Brett Donham, the Architect for the House of Seven Gables,
addressed the Board and reviewed the changes made to the plans
that address the concerns of the Board. He showed the Board
a plan of the light fixtures, and identified the locations of
the lights. Bill Luster noted that the Planning Department
• has the right to review the lighting and can add to it if it
is necessary.
1
• Bill Luster reviewed the draft decision of the plan with the
Planning Board, and additions and deletions were made as follows:
1 . Conformance with Plan - "6/19/92 with final revision" deleted
3 Landscaping - 6/30/92 revised - deleted
b. may be amended if discussions with the
Grand Turk are successful.
Carter Vinson asked if there would be anyone supervising the
cutback of the landscaping. Bill Luster noted that the Planning
Department would have someone supervising the project.
Chuck Puleo recalled that there were discussions about putting
up a canopy near the entrance. Atty. Serafini stated that the
Historic Commission had some concerns about that and that issue
is still open.
There being no further questions or comments from those present,
a motion was made by John Moustakis to approve the plans for
the House of Seven Gables with the 12 conditions, seconded by
David Hart and approved unanimously.
DISCUSSION WITH BANK OF BOSTON REGARDING THE ACCESS ROAD BEHIND
SHAWS SUPERMARKET
• Carter Vinson recused himself from discussion of this matter.
Albert Hill also recused himself from discussion of this matter.
Philip Helm addressed the Planning Board on the matter of the
access Road that the Board required for the Shaws Supermarket
development. He noted that in their review of the remaining
items to be addressed in the PUD, they have questioned the need
for this access road and wish to re-evaluate the need for it.
He noted that they want to comply with the PUD, and would like
some direction from the Planning Board.
Mr. Helm noted that traders Way is well established and that
they feel that the traffic patterns are working well.
Walter Power stated that the access road was discussed to add
to the circulation at Highlander Plaza, noting that he feels
that they need another egress up there.
David Lyon of the Cloister Condo Association which abuts the
property, addressed the Board and asked if the intent of the
access road was to take the pressure off Highland Avenue. Walter
Power stated that in .was discussed because there is only one
entrance to the shopping center.
• Jennifer Murphy of 5 First Street addressed the Board and stated
2
that the area of the loading docks is now a four way intersection
• and she thinks that the road would add more traffic to the area.
Bill Luster noted that most of the plans seen by the Planning
Department show First Street for access, and the undeveloped
parcels need to be considered.
Mr. Helm noted that the owners now, Wolfboro Properties, do
not own the undeveloped properties as Mt. Fafard did when the
road was discussed, and suggested splitting the PUD between
the two owners. He also noted that they are under time
constraints and they would like to file in a few weeks .
Bill Luster stated that he would be reluctant to come to the
Planning• Board to amend the PUD without hard facts, and feels
that they need to give the Planning Board an idea of what is
needed up there. He also noted that he did not think it was
fair to put a time constraint on the Board, since they have
waited 2 '' years to see the project finished.
David Hart suggested that the Board take a look at what is going
on up there to be sure that the road is necessary.
Walter Power suggested to the neighbors that were present that
they appoint a spokesperson to address the Board at meetings
when this matter would be discussed, but noted that all are
welcome to attend the meetings .
• Bill Luster suggested that Wolfboro Properties submit more
information on traffic patterns in the area and the Board would
address the matter at a later date.
INFORMAL DISCUSSION REGARDING POPE AND PROCTOR STREET DEVELOPMENT
Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board on behalf of his clients
who wish to construct an 8 unit building, which would be subject
to SPR by the Planning Board. He stated that they wished to
have an informal meeting with the Board so that they could get
an idea of what the Board expects . He described the area and
the plan and type of buildings that they would like to construct.
Walter Power noted that he would like to see the facade of the
building done carefully so that it goes with the existing
neighborhood. He also suggested that the Board visit the site
before they meet again on the matter.
Carter Vinson asked if there would be common areas on the
property. Atty. Serafini stated that the back of the property
would be open space, which would afford common space .
Kosta Prentakis asked if there would be decks or patios with
the units. Atty. Serafini stated that there could be patios
on grade or decks if the buyer wished, noting that they are
• aiming for . first time buyers.
3
• David Hart stated that he would like to have the drainage plan
explained.
The Board decided to hold a site visit on Saturday, December
5, 1992 .
DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS FOR GREENLAWN AVENUE
Bill Luster presented a request from the Heritage Cooperative
Bank for the release of $40,732.86 . He stated that Will Beaulieu
has been to the site and estimated that $21 ,840.00 worth of
work has been completed. He also noted that Mr. Beaulieu
estimates that there is $43 ,925.00 worth of work to be completed
on the project. Bill Luster recommended that the Board approve
the release of $22 ,000 .00.
Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the release of $22 ,000 .00
from the tri-partite agreement for Greenlawn Avenue, seconded
by Kosta Prentakis and approved unanimously.
Bill Luster also noted that there were some drainage issues
raised by Councillor O 'Leary, and that he thought that there
might be an amended drainage plan, and that Mass. Electric has
held them up a little, but that has to do with paving, and they
are not paving yet.
• OLD/NEW BUSINESS
GAUTHIER MOTORS DEFERMENT OF LANDSCAPING
Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board and requested that his
client, Roland Gauthier be allowed to post a bond in the amount
of $5, 790 .00, and be allowed to defer the completion of the
landscaping of the property until the spring, so that they could
get an occupancy permit for the building. He also explained
the financial situation of his client.
Bill Luster stated that he visited the site with the new building
inspector, and stated that he has no problem with the posting
of the bond or the deferment of the landscaping. He recommended
that the Board approve the request.
Linda Vaughan agreed that the amount of the bond was sufficient.
David Hart asked when they could do the landscaping. Mr.
Gauthier stated that they have the bond for seven months but
they want to do the work earlier if weather permits .
Walter Power expressed his disappointment with the building
that was put up noting that it does not go with the area.
• There being no further comments or questions concerning the
matter a motion was made by Linda Vaughan to accept the bond
4
• in the amount of $5,790.00 , and defer the landscaping for
Gauthier Motors, seconded by Kosta Prentakis, and approved
unanimously.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The approval of the minutes of the meetings of June 4 , 1992,
June 18, 1992, October 8, 1992, and October 15, was postponed
until the next meeting on November 19 , 1992 .
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Linda Vaughan to
adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 10: 30 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB110592
• 5
• MINUTES OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
AND THE
SALEM CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1992
A joint public hearing between the Salem Planning Board and
the Salem City Council was held on Thursday, November 5, 1992
at 6: 30 P.M. in the Council Chambers , for the purpose of
discussing a proposed zoning amendment which would change a
residential 1 (R1 ) district and establish the same as an
industrial ( I ) District at New England Power Company, 24 Fort
Avenue.
Those present were: Planning Board Members Walter Power, Albert
Hill , Kosta Prentakis , Linda Vaughan, David Hart, Carter Vinson,
and John Moustakis . Councilors present were: President Donald
Bates , George Nowak, Kevin Harvey, Vincent Furfaro, Leonard
O 'Leary, Sally Hayes, Mark Blair, George McCabe, Stanley Usovich,
and Jane Stirgwolt. Also present were City Planner William
Luster, Planning Board Aide Debbie Hurlburt and Eileen Sacco,
Clerk.
The meeting was called to order at 6 : 30 P.M. by City Council
• President Donald Bates , who called upon City Planner William
Luster to introduce the members of the Planning Board.
Attorney William Lundregan addressed the hearing on behalf of
his clients New England Power Company to request a zoning change
for a parcel of land they own on Fort Avenue from residential
to industrial use. Atty. Lundregan reviewed the history of
the property and stated that as far back as they can tell the
land was zoned unrestricted industrial in 1929 , and sometime
in 1965 an arbitrary line was drawn in a zoning change that
placed the parcel in a residential zone. He also noted that
the property has always been owed by NEPCO, and that they use
it for storage. He also noted that the property is taxed as
commercial/industrial and NEPCO was unaware that it was zoned
residential until they started to build storage areas on the
property.
Councillor George Nowak asked Atty. Lundregan if NEPCO has any
thoughts of selling the property to SESD. Atty. Lundregan stated
that the land is essential to the operation of NEPCO and they
would fight any attempt to take the parcel .
Walter Power asked if there were any buildings on the land.
Atty. Lundregan stated that there are foundations on the land
and that NEPCO puts storage warehouses up and take them down
as the nature of business changes . Walter Power also asked
• if there was any height restrictions on the buildings . Atty.
Lundregan noted that there were none other than what is allowed
by zoning.
f.
• David Hart asked what triggered NEPCO to request the rezoning
of the parcel. Atty. Lundregan stated that NEPCO always assumed
that the property was zoned commercial/industrial and when they
were putting up a storage warehouse they were informed by the
building inspector that they needed a variance.
Carter Vinson asked if there were any plans to develop the area
at a later date. Atty. Lundregan stated no.
Councillor Kevin Harvey asked what was currently on the site.
Atty. Lundregan stated that there was parking and the foundation
slabs for the buildings . Councillor Harvey asked if there was
any chance that the public could be allowed access to the area
and Atty. Lundregan replied that they could not allow public
access due to liability issues.
There being no further questions or comments from those present,
a motion was made by Councillor O'Leary to close the public
hearing, seconded by Councillor Harvey and approved unanimously.
A report with recommendations by the Planning Board will be
submitted to the City Council within 21 days of this public
hearing.
Atty. Lundregan requested that the City Clerk notify NEPCO
• of the date of the meeting at which the City Council will decide
the matter.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
J /
-�h {iia' 1
EILEEN M. SACCO7 CLERK
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
PB110592
r
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, October 15, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, David
Hart, John Moustakis, Debbie Hilbert, Carter Vinson, Kosta
Prentakis and Chuck Puleo. Also present were City Planner Bill
Luster, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski, and Eileen Sacco,
Clerk.
DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC AND MATERIAL CHANGE - 10 DEARBORN
STREET
Gail and James Sagris were present at the meeting to request
a Determination of Specific and Material Change for their
proposal regarding the construction of a deck at 10 Dearborn
Street due to a denial of a Special Permit from the Board of
Appeal. This request was originally presented to the Planning
Board on September 17, 1992 and the Board approved the change
with 6 votes in favor and none opposed. A letter was sent to
the Board of Appeal notifying them of the approval of the
• Substantial Change. At the September 30, 1992 meeting of the
Board of Appeal, a question was raised regarding whether the
2./3 votes, which the Planning Board obtained, was sufficient,
citing that more than the 2/3 member present vote was necessary.
William Luster noted that he sought an opinion from Assistant
City Solicitor Len Femino and he has summarized that the
petitioner needs the approval of all but one Planning Board
member. He has advised that the Planning Board hear the petition
again.
Councillor Leonard O'Leary addressed the Board and stated that
the Board of Appeal has continued the matter until they get
a legal opinion of the matter, and questioned whether the
Planning Board should address the issue since the Board of Appeal
has continued the matter.
Bill Luster stated that the Planning Board has no involvement
with the Board of Appeal and they are required to address the
matter.
Carter Vinson suggested that the Board condition the approval
to have the petitioner withdraw the request should the ZBA
opinion from the City Solicitor require.
Debbie Hilbert suggested that the Planning Board approve the
• request let the ZBA decide if it is proper.
1
• proper.
Mr. Sagris addressed the Board and presented his plans for the
construction of the deck. He noted that he has reduced the
size of the original plan 108. He also showed the previous
plan presented to the Board of Appeal that was denied. He also
showed photographs of the project.
Shirley Leclerc of 8 Dearborn Street addressed the Board and
stated that she is the abutter and that the deck would only
be 7 or 8 feet from her window, and she feels that it is too
close to her property. She also stated that she felt it would
be an intrusion to her.
Walter Power explained the role of the Planning Board concerning
this request, and suggested that she address her concerns to
the Board of Appeal if the Planning Board approved the request.
Councillor O'Leary stated that he did not feel that 108 was
a substantial enough change, and suggested that they put the
deck in another location.
There being no further questions or comments concerning this
matter a motion was made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the
Determination of Substantial Change for 10 Dearborn Street,
seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously, with 8
members present.
• SITE PLAN REVIEW - HOUSE OF SEVEN GABLES
Attorney John Serafini addressed the Board and reviewed the
progress of the proposal since the last meeting concerning the
matter. He stated that suggestions have been made by members
of the Planning Department and they have tried to include them
into the plans .
the Architect Brett Donham showed the Board the revised plans
and discussed the changes with them.
He noted that they have reorganized the parking and provided
a walkway for the bus passengers getting dropped off in the
area. He also noted that on the advice of the City Engineer
they have rethought the drainage plan. He stated that the City
Engineer suggested that they have the storm water disposal in
leeching pits, and he also wanted to be sure that there is
sufficient water pressure to sustain the sprinkler system.
He noted that they have tested the area on Turner and Hardy
Streets, and there is sufficient pressure.
David Hart asked to have the lighting plan reviewed, and
suggested that they could add another light fixture.
• Debbie Hilbert addressed the entrance and exit locations. It
was noted that a major change is that the busses will now exit
2
• on Turner Street.
Edith Harmon addressed the Board and noted that bus tours make
prior reservations and that they can only handle one bus per
half hour, noting that the maximum number of busses at one time
would be two and there should be adequate space to handle them.
Attorney Serafini noted that discussions with the Grand Turk
are still a possibility.
Carter Vinson asked 'about the number of employees with respect
to the number of parking spaces . Edith Harmon noted that the
employees park on site and that some walk or take a train or
bus so there should be no problem. Atty. Serafini stated that
he was meeting with the Atty. for the abutters tomorrow and
that they were going to try to work out a solution to their
concerns.
Chuck Puleo noted that there is a lot of bus traffic in the
city in October and asked if a study had been done on it. Bill
Luster stated that they didn' t attempt to address the bus parking
city wide, although spaces were added by there were no enough.
Bill Luster noted that they changed their parking plan at the
suggestion of the Planning Department and also noted that there
may be a change in the installation of granite curbing due to
• the excessive cost that it would be, and since they are a non
profit organization, he would like to work with them to see
if there is another solution.
FORM B - FRANK AND PATRICK DeIULIS - MOONEY ROAD
Chuck Puleo recused himself from discussion of this matter.
Atty. Serafini addressed the Board and stated that they were
informally presenting their proposal to see which direction
they should go. He presented the plans and noted that they
reconfigured to comply with existing subdivision regulations,
and all lots comply.
Bill Luster suggested that the Board have a site visit and that
they informally meet at the next meeting and possibly file a
form C.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of February 6, 1992 were presented
for approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the minutes,
seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of May 21 , 1992 were presented for
• approval. Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the minutes
of the meeting of May 21 , 1992 and approved unanimously.
3
• Beth Debski noted that the time of the joint public hearing
with the City Council on November 5, 1992 has been changed to
6 : 30 P.M.
There being' no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting a motion was made by Chuck Puleo to adjourn
the meeting seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 9 :15 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB101592
•
• 4
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1 , 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, October 1 , 1992, at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter
Vinson, Kosta Prentakis, Debbie Hilbert, and Albert Hill. Also
present were Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Linda
Vaughan and John Moustakis were absent.
HOUSE OF SEVEN GABLES DISCUSSION
The discussion of the House of Seven Gables scheduled for this
meeting was postponed until October 15, 1992 .
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF MONEY - HERITAGE COOPERATIVE BANK
Debbie Hurlburt presented a request from the Heritage Cooperative
Bank for the release of $70,000.00 from the $153,000.00 being
held in escrow for the Greenlawn Avenue subdivision. She noted
that Will Beaulieu had inspected the site and estimated that
$86,000.00 worth of work had been completed, and that about
• $60,000.00 worth of work remained to be completed. She also
noted that approving this request would leave $83,000.00 more
than enough to finish the project.
Carter Vinson expressed his concern that the Board should not
give the entire amount requested.
David Hart agreed and recommended that they release $50,000 .00,
as it is common to retain 10% for leverage. He also noted that
the Board approved their request to get the permits for the
foundations.
Albert Hill stated that he felt that the Board should release
the entire amount requested since they have $86,000 .00 worth
or work finished, and are only requesting $70,000.00.
Walter Power suggested that the Board release $60, 000 .00, as
incentive to move the job along, noting that some money should
be held back until the punch list is completed.
Motion made by Debbie Hilbert to release $60,000.00 for the
Greenlawn Avenue subdivision, seconded by Carter Vinson and
approved 6-1 with Albert Hill voting against the motion.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Debbie Hurlburt informed the Board that New England Power has
1
petitioned the city to rezone a parcel of land that is
residential to industrial use. A joint public hearing of the
Planning Board and the City Council needs to be held. The Public
Hearing will be held on Thursday, November 5, 1992 at 6:00 P.M.
in the Council Chambers.
Debbie Hurlburt also presented a letter from the City Clerk
notifying the Board that Mussalini Road has been changed to
Michael Road.
David Hart asked that the plans for the YMCA be checked to see
if they called for the installation of bollards in the parking
area.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of July 16, 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the minutes
of July 16, 1992, seconded by Carter Vinson and approved
unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of July 30, 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the minutes
of the meeting of July 30, 1992, seconded by David Hart and
approved unanimously.
• The minutes of the meeting of September 3, 1992 were presented
for approval. Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the
minutes of the meeting of September 3, 1992, seconded by Chuck
Puleo and approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of September 17, 1992 were presented
for approval. Motion made by Debbie Hilbert to approve the
minutes of the meeting of September 17, 1992, seconded by Kosta
Prentakis and approved unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Carter Vinson to
adjourn the meeting seconded by Debbie Hilbert and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 P.M.
xZTFU�,LY SUBMITTED BY:
EI EENv�M. S CCO, CLERK
PB100192
2
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, September 17, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. , in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Linda Vaughan, Carter Vinson, Kosta
Prentakis, Chuck Puleo, David Hart, Debbie Hilbert, and Albert
Hill ( 8:50) . Walter Power and John Moustakis were absent.
Also present were, City Planner Bill Luster, Beth Debski, and
Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
In the absence of Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan assumed
the Chair.
DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE - GAIL AND JAMES SAGRIS
10 DEARBORN STREET
Beth Debski addressed the Board and stated that this petition
was approved on September 3, 1992, but unfortunately the abutters
were not notified in time for the meeting, as required by law,
and the Sagris ' must reappear to resubmit their request.
Mr. Sagris presented a drawing of the plans to the board. He
. noted that he is changing the floor plan of the deck by 10%.
Linda Vaughan asked if there was anyone present at the meeting
who wished to speak about the proposal. There being no response,
a motion was made by David Hart to approve the determination
of substantial change for 10 Dearborn Street, seconded by Debbie
Hilbert, and approved unanimously.
FORM A - GREENLAWN AVENUE
Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board on behalf of his client,
Mr. Finnochio, to request approval of a form A, for two lots
on Greenlawn Avenue. He noted that there is sufficient frontage
for the lots and that sidewalks would be constructed on both
sides of the street.
Kosta Prentakis asked if there were any plans to go to the Board
of Appeal for variances or further subdivision. Atty. Serafini
replied that they have no plans to do that.
Chuck Puleo noted that the original subdivision plan called
for sidewalks on one side of the street. Beth Debski stated
that the plan indicates sidewalks on both sides of the street.
John Serafini noted that they are not requesting a waiver from
granite curbing.
1
Motion made by David Hart to approve the Form A for Greenlawn
_ Ave. , seconded by Chuck Puleo, and approved unanimously.
FORM C - BERRYWOOD LANE
Linda Vaughan recused herself from discussion of this matter
and Chuck Puleo assumed the chair.
Scott Pertovich, Kevin Hines, and Lisa Rohmar, were present
at the meeting representing Prolog Corp. Scott Petrovich
presented revised plans for the review of the board.
Beth Debski noted that the "No Building Zone" is more clearly
marked and noted on the plan. She also noted that Will Beaulieu
visited the site and it was determined that the wall that is
of concern to Mr. Petit is located on the Schraders property
and therefore cannot be addressed by Prolog.
The Board reviewed the plans for the stairs to the open space
and David Hart noted that he was satisfied that the weep holes
are there.
Chuck Puleo asked about the number of trees that are there.
It was noted that there are five and that the pZlanting strip
would be replaced.
Chuck Puleo also noted that the pavement has a base coat and
. a remanufactured coat and asked what they are going to do.
Mr. Petrovich noted that they are going to match the pavement
that is there and lay over it per city standard.
Chuck Puleo also asked if they have a construction schedule
in place. Ms. Rohmar stated that they have not selected a
contractor.
Chuck Puleo also asked if a bond was going to be posted. Beth
Debski stated that they have agreed to a covenant instead of
a bond.
Chuck Puleo reviewed the proposed conditions for the project.
Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the Form C, for
Berrywood Lane with the conditions and waivers as read, seconded
by David Hart and approved unanimously.
DISCUSSION WITH BANK OF BOSTON - RE: COMMERCIAL PORTION OF FAFARD
PUD DEVELOPMENT
Carter Vinson recused himself from discussion of this matter.
Bill Luster addressed the Board and stated that he had been
contacted by the Bank of Boston, notifying him that they had
taken over the commercial portion of the Fafard property on
2
Highland Avenue. He noted that he suggested to them that they
come to a meeting to introduce themselves to the Board and talk
about the future.
David Meade, Asset Manager for the Bank of Boston addressed
the Board and explained that the Bank had taken over Highlander
Plaza portion of the Commercial Property. He also explained
that the bank would manage the property through a subsidiary
called Wolfboro Properties Inc.
Mr. Meade stressed that the bank wants to abide by all of the
conditions of the PUD. He showed the Board a sketch of the
area and explained that they own Highlander Plaza, Somerville
Lumber is on its own, and Fafard retained the Residential Condos.
Debbie Hilbert asked if they owned the area where the proposed
Taco Bell is to be located. Mr. Meade stated that they have
no definite commitment at this time, but noted that Fafard have
discussions with Taco Bell, MVP Sports, and Staples.
Mr. Meade stated that right now they are concentrating on paving
Traders Way, and the finish coat on First Street should be
completed by winter. He also stated that the railing in front
of CVS would be installed.
Bill Luster stated that it will be a complicated matter, since
there are expectations and obligations beyond the PUD from other
,• decisions, such as the deceleration lane.
Kosta Prentakis suggested that the Planning Department compile
a list of the outstanding items so everyone knows from the
beginning what needs to be completed.
Debbie Hilbert stated that since the PUD precedes her as a Board
Member, she would like to have it reviewed.
Mr. Meade stated that the purpose of this discussion was to
get some guidance from the Board as to what they need to do.
Bill Luster noted that he wants to look at the whole PUD and
see what is still in effect.
Kosta Prentakis expressed his concerns about the back portion
of the Shaw's Parking area and asked that they look into making
it safer.
Bill Luster suggested that the bank do a survey of the parcels
that they own and the Planning Department will compile a punch
list of items to address.
DISCUSSION WITH ATTY. SERAFINI - RE: HOUSE OF SEVEN GABLES
Atty. Serafini addressed the Board and stated that since the
site visit by the board, they have tried to address the concerns
• 3
raised. He noted that the reconfiguration of the access for
the busses is being worked on by the architects. He stated
' that they have approached the owner of the Grand Turk and he
has indicated that when he solves some matters that he is working
on he would be willing to talk about a solution to the problem.
Atty. Serafini also stated that they are anxious to proceed
and want to assist the board in any way that they can.
Bill Luster stated that they wanted to give the Gables an idea
of where the Planning Department stands on the project, noting
that the board will discuss the matter later in this meeting
and when the recommendations are made they will forward them
to Atty. Serafini and meet with the Architect. He noted that
he hoped to get back to Atty. Serafini next week.
OLD / NEW BUSINESS
GREENLAWN AVENUE SUBDIVISION
Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board with Peter Copolas,
President of Heritage Cooperative Bank to request that the Board
allow the release of the lots so that simultaneous construction
can occur. He explained the history of the property and noted
that they have executed a Tri-Party Agreement between the
developer, the bank and the City of Salem. He also noted that
$158,000 had been set aside by the bank. Atty. Serafini noted
that there is more than sufficient cash set aside to finish
the project. He also stressed that there is not much likelihood
of the local bank failing on their commitment since the President
signed the agreement and set aside the cash.
Peter Copolas stated that they have three houses under agreement
and they are not asking for certificates of occupancy to be
issued. He also asked if he could submit a bill for blasting
for $32,000, to have the money released. Bill Luster explained
the process for releasing funds. He noted that the clerk of
the works would reveiw the work done and determine the value
and the planning Department would submit it to the board.
Bill Luster also noted that he had been out to the site since
the last meeting of the Board and has seen a lot of progress.
He also noted that while there is no road it could be done around
the 29th of September as indicated by the contractor at the
last meeting.
Linda Vaughan asked if the approval of the foundations meant
that they would be able to pull a building permit. Bill Luster
stated yes that they could get a building permit, but suggested
that the board could allow the foundations and ask them to come
back in two weeks to see where they stand. He also stated that
he felt that the $158,000 was more than enough to cover the
cost of completion and he is comfortable with the number.
• 4
Carter Vinson asked if anything happened to the bank, would
FDIC honor the Tri-Party Agreement. Bill Luster stated that
he has never had to deal with that issue, so he was unsure if
they would honor it or not.
David Hart asked if the Planning Department could retain money
to insure completion of the project. Bill Luster said yes they
could. He also noted that the Board could be conservative in
releasing the money.
Debbie Hilbert asked if the Board could reduce the amount of
money requested for release. Bill Luster stated yes.
Motion made by Albert Hill to release the lots for foundation
permits and have them come back in two weeks to report on the
progress of the work, seconded by David Hart and approved 6-
1 with Carter Vinson opposed.
Bill Luster stated that he would send a letter to the building
department noting that the building permit should only be for
foundations, so that the permit can be conditioned.
DISCUSSION OF HOUSE OF SEVEN GABLES
Bill Luster discussed the concerns raised at the Public Hearing
and the site visit. He noted that the Planning Department is
• doing an inter office review. He further noted that on October
14 , the 90 days is up, but that they will ask for an extension.
He also stated that he hopes to have a draft decision ready
for approval in 4 weeks.
Bill Luster reviewed the parking plan and showed a suggested
plan done by the Planning Department for parking and landscaping.
He also noted that they need to maintain the sidewalk on Derby
Street.
Linda Vaughan stated that she liked the idea of having the exit
on Turner Street, and that resident parking only on the street
was a good idea.
David Hart stated that he was concerned that there is no curb
cut for the Grand Turk Parking Lot. He suggested writing a
letter to the Board of Appeal, since they are addressing the
matter on September 30.
Bill Luster also reviewed the landscaping for the plan. he
stated that he did not think that they will be able to keep
some of the existing trees as they have stated. He stated that
the Planning Department will keep working on the plan and report
to the Board soon.
• 5
r
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of September 3, 1992 were presented
for approval. The Board postponed approval until the next
meeting.
There being no further business to come before the Board at
this meeting a motion was made by Kosta Prentakis to adjourn
the meeting seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB091792
•
iY
. 6
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, September 3, 1992 at 7: 30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, Carter
Vinson, Kosta Prentakis, David Hart, Debbie Hilbert, Chuck
Puleo and Albert Hill . . Also present were City Planner Bill
Luster, Debbie Hurlburt and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. John Moustakis
was absent.
FORM C - BERRYWOOD LANE SUBDIVISION - CONTINUATION
Debbie Hurlburt noted that at the public hearing held on July
17 , 1992, two concerns were raised at the meeting. The first
being that building restriction lines be placed on the deeds
so that potential buyers are aware that these restrictions exist.
She noted that Atty. Robert Orsi, representing the applicant
has no objections with making this part of the decision. The
second issue was whether or not the Planning Board could act
on the Subdivision while legal action is pending on the previous
subdivision plan for the same lots . She stated that Asst. City
Solicitor Leonard_ Femino has stated that the Planning Board
• may and in fact must act on this Form C even though there is
legal action pending. She also noted that Atty. Femino is
reluctant to give a written opinion on the matter due to
potential appeal of any decision the Board makes.
Debbie also noted that the Clerk of the Works, Will Beaulieu
went out to the site and looked at the wall which was of concern
too Mr. Petit. She stated that he was unable to contact Mr.
Petit for permission to go on his property, but from what he
could see, he did not see a problem, but with permission of
the owner he could take a closer look.
\. Atty. Orsi noted that the bank does not own the lot that the
wall is located on and is not obligated to repair it. Walter
Power suggested that with the permission of the owner they could
access the property to repair it.
Bill Luster stated that if Prolog is able to access the property
and it is part of the original subdivision then they should
be required to fix it, but if it turns out that to be on 16t
1 which is no longer part of the subdivision then they can't
be required to do it.
David Hart noted that there were supposed to be shrubs planted
as a screen from lights.
• 1
i
Bill Luster suggested that the Board could make a site visit
to see where the wall is located, and could approve the matter
at the next meeting.
The Board reviewed the original subdivision plan and it was
noted that the wall appears to be on lot 1 , Walter Power stated
that the former developer should be responsible for the repair
of the wall, if it is falling into Mr. Petit's yard.
Atty. Orsi stated that the bank does not own lot 1 because it
was released from the covenant and is not protected by the
subdivision.
Walter Power suggested that the wall be looked at and see if
the matter can be addressed.
Debbie Hurlburt reviewed the proposed conditions for the project.
Kosta Prentakis expressed concern that Prolog is a bank and
that condition ;;05 call for a tri-party agreement, which would
be between the city, Prolog, and a bank. He requested that
another bank be used for the tri-party agreement. Atty. Orsi
stated that it would not be a problem. He also noted that there
is not much work left to be completed and it should only take
about 9 weeks to complete.
Walter Power stated that he wanted to be sure that all punch
• list items were included in the plan. Upon review of the punch
list it was determined that all items are included.
DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE - 10 DEARBORN STREET
Debbie Hurlburt noted that Gail and James Sagris of 10 Dearborn
Street were denied a special permit by the Board of Appeal to
extend nonconforming side and rear setbacks to allow the
construction of a deck at 10 Dearborn Street. She explained
that 1 abutter was opposed to the deck, noting that the deck
is located 7 feet from the lot line and 10 feet from the property
line. She also noted that the slab was existing before
construction of the deck. The Sagris ' s are requesting a
determination of substantial change from the plan denied by
the Board of Appeal. The have reduced the size of the deck
10% by changing the size from 9 ' 10" X 11 ' S" to 9 ' 10" X 8 '
2" . The issue before the Planning Board is to determine if
10% is a substantial change.
Motion made by Albert Hill to approve the Determination of
Substantial Change for 10 Dearborn Street, seconded by Linda
Vaughan and approved unanimously.
DISCUSSION REGARDING GREENLANN AVENUE SUBDIVISION
A J Hill the builder for the subdivision was present and the
• 2
meeting with the Real Estate agent Susan Corbett to request
that the Board release 3 of the four lots in the subdivision.
Mr. Hill explained that they are requesting that they be allowed
to build the foundations before the road is built so that they
can get them in while the weather is still good. They also
requested that money be released to finance the building of
the road. Mr. Hill stated that the road should be completed
in about a month. He also noted that he is not looking for
an occupancy permit.
Susan Corbett explained that the bank foreclosed on the property
and that her clients Paul Perkins, Peter Perkins, and George
Cronin are now the owners of the property, and that Heritage
Bank is financing the construction.
Linda Vaughan questioned the release of money to finance the
road. Walter Power noted the Board 's history with the Berrywood
Lane Subdivision, and stated that he was against releasing any
lots until it is completed.
Bill Luster noted that there is a difference from Berrywood,
since the cash exists to complete the project.
Susan Corbett stated that she realizes that times have been
tough and noted that she has worked with these developers before
and they won ' t go under.
• Al Hill asked what the time frame was for when they want to
start. Susan Corbett stated that they won 't have the money
for two weeks and they can ' t start until then.
Bill Luster explained that the city usually releases money as
the work is done, after the Clerk of the Works verifies that
the work has been done and determines the value of the work
completed. Walter Power asked if the road would be completed
y September 29 . Mr. Hill stated that it depends on the weather.
He also noted that they want to do the blasting for the
foundations at the same time because fill is being trucked in
and they don' t want to stockpile it. Walter Power agreed that
the blasting should be done all at once.
Bill Luster suggested that the Board wait on the decision and
consider it again at the next meeting after two weeks of
progress.
David Hart agreed, noting that he did not feel that enough of
the members were in agreement with the proposal .
The Board will consider the matter again in two weeks .
Chuck Puleo suggested that the Board get a report from Will
Beaulieu.
• 3
J/
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Kosta Prentakis asked about the status of the Gables proposal .
Bill Luster noted that he is doing a detailed review, and that
Debbie and Juli are working on the site plan review. He noted
that they are not rushing because this needs time.
Bill Luster also informed the Board that Beth Debski is working
on the Master Plan and they may have an outline to discuss by
October.
Walter Power informed the Board that he and Bill Luster met
with the Peabody Museum, Salem State, Salem Hospital, and New
England Power for an informational discussion on the home rule
petition to have Plaster Plans approved by the Planning Board.
Bill Luster noted that after the legislation is passed, the
ordinance can be defined.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The approval of the minutes of the meeting of July 30, 1992
was postponed until the next meeting on September 17, 1992 .
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Albert Hill to
adjourn the meeting, seconded by David Hart and approved
unanimously.
• The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY;
EIL7Lr,N M. SACC ,- CLERK
PB090392
• 4
OCT 16 1992
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD MEETING eS � y P�Ail �� U DF �.
REVISED MINUTES OF JULY 30, 1992 "tial
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday,
July 30, 1992 at 7: 30 P.M. On the second floor at One Salem
Green, Salem, MA.
Present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Kosta Prentakis,
Chuck Puleo, Linda Vaughn, Carter Vinson, City Planner Bill
Luster, Assistant City Planner Beth Debski, Planning Administrator
Debra Hurlburt, and Acting Clerk Debra Tucker.
WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT: ARMSTRONG
There were two letters of comment to be received by the Salem
Planning Board with regard to the Wetlands and Flood Hazard
Special Permit for Julie Armstrong and Ronald Mento for work
within the Buffer zone before approval could be granted. A
draft decision was submitted by City Planner William Luster.
The two comment letters from the City Engineer and the City
Building Inspector' s office have been received as well. Everything
else was in order
• Chuck Puleo asked if Mr. Colpitts was the adjacent owner. Bill
Luster replied that he was, and that he was probably awaiting
the decision on the Armstrong and Claveau matters as precedents
to then try for approval. He added that the cease and desist
order from the Conservation Commission was still in effect.
There is litigation pending with regard to bankruptcy. There
has been some difficulty with the Tri-Partite Agreement with.
the bank concerning the money put aside for the completion of
street lighting and fire alarms.
Walter Power asked if this was the final approval that the parti-
tioners needed for plan approval. Bill Luster said that it
was.
Chuck Puleo moved that the measure be adopted subject to the
plans submitted. David Hart seconded the motion, and the vote
was unanimously in favor.
FORM A: JACKSON/VALE STS.
Attorney Jack Kielty appeared before the Board on behalf of
the owner of property at Jackson and Vale Streets. Bill Luster
stated that the proposal was a straightforward Form A application.
Attorney Kielty presented an assessor' s map to propose that
the four lots owned by Maryann Preece, be consolidated into two
lots. Lot A on the plan is a Land Court Plan and will be combined
with Lot A to become one parcel. Lot one will increase its
Page 2 of 3
Minutes of 7-30-92 Planning Board Meeting
• size from 3, 104 square feet to 4, 988 square feet. The property
at 65 Broad St. has the frontage on Broad Street. There are
currently two buildings on the whole site. There will be sufficient
frontage and area.
Attorney Kielty told the board that his client has no intentions
of developing the site. Walter Power questioned how the two
processes of combining four lots and a way to become two lots
could be done with one Form A. Attorney Kielty stated that
the property is all under one ownership. Bill Luster answered
that although this would change the lots, it would absorb four
lots into two lots. Attorney Kielty felt that this was the
most practical way to resolve the issue. There is no technical
reason for the division of the property. His client currently
lives in California and intends to sell the property.
Linda Vaughn moved that the Planning Board approve the Form
A for the property at Jackson and Vale Streets. Chuck Puleo
seconded the motion. Carter Vinson abstained, and the rest
of the board were in favor of the motion.
FORM A• 0 CLARK AVE.
Attorney Charles M. Helmer, Jr. appeared before the board for
• the presentation of a Form A application and plans on behalf
of Rudolf and Mary Gowitz/David Russo for property at 0 Clark
Ave. and 2 Clark Ave. There has been a lot line change with
approval granted by the Board of Appeal from lot frontage require-
ments. In 1964 a driveway was installed when the house was
built at 0 Clark Ave. In 1989 Mr. Russo found that the driveway
was actually on his land. A February 1992 settlement allowed
the driveway .to remain with an easement granted for the Gowitzes
life or until they sell the property only.
Kosta Prentakis moved that the Form A application for 0 Clark
Ave. be granted. Linda Vaughn seconded the motion, and the
motion was unanimously approved.
REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN: CLIPPERSHIP INN
Charles Daley of the Clippership Inn appeared before the board
with a revised landscape plan. He indicated that the dumpster
will remain in the same place.
Mr. Daley and the board discussed the new landscape plans.
There were concerns that maybe too much of the vegetation had
been discarded. Bill Luster recommended that the Planning depart-
ment ' s staff landscape architect study the new plan since the
plan had been significantly changed. Mr. Daley expressed concern
• that he needs an approved plan since the paving is scheduled
to be completed very soon.
Page 3 of 3
Minutes of 7-30-92 Planning Board Meeting
• David Hart moved that the revised landscape schematic presented
be approved subject to review and approval by the City Planner
with any changes recommended by the City Planner to be submitted
to the Planning Board by way of a formal amended plan. Kosta
Prentakis seconded the motion, and the vote was unanimously
approved.
DISCUSSION: 'CITY MASTER PLAN
Bill Luster and Beth Debski presented the Planning Department' s
suggested ideas for study area priorities for the new City Master
Plan. Bill Luster reported that the process for creating the
plan will take approximately eighteen months. David Hart stated
that the process should be somehow open to the comments and
suggestions of the public. Walter Power suggested that the
outline be by categories areas with goals for specific areas
rather than by City areas.
OLD BUSINESS
David Hart asked about Councilor Furfaro' s comments which appeared
in a Salem Evening News article. Bill Luster explained that
Mr. Furfaro had asked for information about Clark Avenue and
its lack of streetlights. He added that the Planning Department
• will be getting the information to him.
Walter Power asked that the Planning Department give its recom-
mendation to the Planning Board concerning street light requirements
for future subdivision guidelines.
NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business before the board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There were no minutes presented for approval.
ADJOURNMENT
The next Planning Board meeting will be held September 3, 1992 .
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board, a motion was made by Linda Vaughn to adjourn the meeting
at 9 :45 P.M. David Hart seconded the motion, and the motion
was approved unanimously.
Respectfully submitted
By:
•y Debra A. Tt&ker
Acting Clerk
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
• MINUTES OF MEETING
JULY 16, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, June 16, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, David
Hart, John Moustakis, Kosta Prentakis, Carter Vinson, Debbie
Hilbert, and Chuck Puleo. Also present were, City Planner
William Luster, Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Albert
Hill was absent.
SITE PLAN REVIEW HOUSE OF SEVEN GABLES
Attorney John Serafini, representing the House of Seven Gables
addressed the Planning Board on behalf of his clients. He
reviewed the history of the House of Seven Gables and outlined
the need for the Gables to construct a 14,000 s.f. addition
to the present visitors center. A portion of the present
visitors center will come down to accommodate the expanded
Education Center. The education Center is a one story building
with a full basement. It will contain an exhibition/ ticket/
• reception area, two classrooms for 45 persons each, a museum
shop, a 100 person lecture hall, curatorial space, toilets,
and other support spaces. A 160 s .f. kitchen addition is also
proposed for the Retire Becket House. Atty. Serafini also noted
that the Historic Commission had approved the footprint in
concept, stating that they are having ongoing discussions
concerning color, lighting and other Historic Commission
concerns. He also noted that they are working the Mass.
Historic.
Mr. Donham, the Architect for the project, presented a model
of the site and explained the existing buildings and the location
of the proposed construction. He noted that the area is zoned
business and residential and that presently the Gables has the
capacity for 72 cars and busses on the site and the new plan
calls for 67 cars and busses will park off site. He further
noted that the proposed addition will provide for classroom
orientation and archival space which is presently located in
an attic, and is could cause deterioration of the archives due
to changes in temperature.
Mr. Donham explained that the utilities would be coming off
Turner and Hardy Streets. He noted that the City Engineer
requested that they not go into the sanitary lines and they
will recharge storm water into the ground. He also stated that
they would designate an area of the parking area to plow snow
• during the winter months. He also stressed that they would
be eliminating some of the noise problem in the area by not
1
• having busses park on site.
Robin Canner, of Canner Designs explained the Landscaping Plan
to the Board. She noted that a Colonial Revival Garden exists
in the center of the property and that landscaping has been
designed to coordinate with that. She also stated that any
plant material that is dug up will be reused.
Edith Harmon of the House of Seven Gables addressed the Board
and stated that it is important to the Gables that they
establish good educational programs. She noted that they have
45 students who attend programs there and that they need the
additional space to adequately develop their programs. She
further noted that they are not trying to attract more visitors
to the Gables, as they could not handle any more than they
presently receive, rather they are trying to improve the programs
they run in the off season.
Joseph Axelrod of the House of Seven Gables Settlement
Association addressed the Board and reviewed the programs that
the settlement offers. He noted that those programs are funded
with the money the Gables receives from the tours of the house.
City Planner William Luster stated that the proposal has gone
through discussions with the Historic Commission, and has
received variances from the Board of Appeal. He suggested
that a meeting of representatives of the Planning Board, the
Historic Commission, and the Board of Appeal should be held
and that those discussions can be explained to the Board.
Debbie Hilbert asked if they were using clap boards on the
buildings. Mr. Donham stated that they were using clap board
and that they had picked up the two principal colors of the
site. He also noted that Mass. Historic requires that they
make it clear in the design that they are new buildings and
that they are not historic buildings.
It was noted that the Board of Appeal decision indicated that
the plan for bus parking needs to be approved at a later date
when the details are worked out with the city. Atty. Serafini
stated that they are hoping to provide bus parking close by,
perhaps the Almys lot or Parker Brothers.
Linda Vaughan asked what the material would be for the canopy.
Mr. Donham stated that it would be the same roofing material
as the rest of the building.
David Hart asked if there would be any air conditioning units
on the roof. Mr. Donham stated that they would be using roof
top units which will be screened by pitched roofs all around.
David Hart asked if the units would be running 24 hours a day.
Mr. Donham replied that there would probably not be a need to
• run them 24 hours a day, but he could not predict what the cycle
would be. David Hart expressed his concern about night time
2
• operation and the noise level. Walter Power suggested that
the Architect provide more information on the noise level at
night.
Walter Power asked if any thought had been given to combing
the two lots and work something out with the Grand Turk
Restaurant. Atty. Serafini noted that the Gables had been trying
to purchase that parcel, and that the owner sold to the Grand
Turk. He stated that they would talk to the Grand Turk owners
and see if they could work something out. Walter Power noted
that they would like to reduce the number of curb cuts along
Derby Street.
Walter Power asked for an explanation of the onsite drainage
plan. Mr. Donham stated that they recently found out that they
have to do this and have not worked out the specifics of it
as of yet. They had hoped to continue as it is presently. Atty.
Serafini stated that they would be working out the drainage
with the city and are exploring recharging storm drainage on
site. He noted that if that is not possible they would have
to put a storm drain in. He also noted that there are no storm
drains in the area.
Kosta Prentakis asked how much lighting would be added to the
site. Mr. Donham stated that they are adding 5 fixtures to
the site, noting that they would be antique posts. He also
stated that lighting is being discussed with the Historical
Commission.
Walter Power opened the hearing up to comments from those in
attendance.
Attorney Jackie Voss Lees addressed the Board on behalf of her
client David Bystrom, who resides at 42 Turner Street and has
appealed the decision of the Board of Appeal. She noted that
the decision was dimensional and that they felt that the parking
plan was inadequate as they have 90 employees and they need
to have one space for every two employees. She also questioned
a traffic study. She also noted that they are concerned about
where the busses will park with the new parking plan. She
asked that the Planning Board deny the request. Ms. Lees also
noted that the variance granted relative to parking should not
have been granted.
Sophie Sawicki of 39 Turner Street addressed the Board and
expressed her concern that the area is congested, and that all
of those buildings would block the view. She also opposed the
expansion of the kitchen in the Retire Becket House, and noted
that recently there have been Wedding Receptions held on the
property which created noise. Ms. Sawicki also stated that
she is concerned about fire safety vehicles that barely make
• it down Turner Street now. Walter Power asked her if the bus
engines bother her. She replied that they do and they smell
3
• terrible.
Anthony Iwanaki of 47 Turner Street addressed the Board and
stated that he is concerned about noise in the area and also
referred to the Wedding Receptions that going on.
Carol Morgan of 24 Hardy Street addressed the Board and stated
that the Weddings are annoying and they create parking problems .
She noted that alcohol is served at the functions and she has
seen people drive down Derby Street the wrong way.
Donald Derflinger of 26 Hardy Street addressed the Board and
stated that he has no problem with the Gables and the Weddings
are not a problem, noting that he did not hear any noise.
Debbie Marcus of 42 Turner Street addressed the Board and stated
that she is opposed to the expansion of the Gables noting that
it is in a residential neighborhood and it would not expand
the tax base for the city.
Joanie Lawrence of 39 Turner Street addressed the Board and
requested that the members visit the neighborhood before deciding
on the matter. She also presented a letter from her neighbor
Sandra Northrop of 49 Turner Street. ( A copy is attached to
these minutes. )
• David Bystrom of 42 Turner Street addressed the Board and stated
that the bus parking abuts his property and that he is opposed
to removing any .greenery.
Attorney John Serafini addressed the Board to make closing
statements. He stated that he felt that the Board of Appeal
made a thorough decision, and acted with in the scope of the
ordinance. He also noted that the Site Plan Review process
is a changing process and that the information requested will
be submitted, and changes made if requested. Atty. Serafini
also. noted that the Gables held three neighborhood meetings
and that they have taken the neighbors concerns into
consideration.
Carter Vinson asked if the food facility would be expanded at
the Retire Becket House. Atty. Serafini stated that it would
not be expanded and that the number of seats would remain the
same.
Linda Vaughan asked about the number of people who attend the
weddings. Edith Harmon stated that the Weddings are held outside
and they have to stop by 9:30 P.M.
Walter Power read comments from the Board of Health and the
City Engineer and both concur with the project.
• Linda Vaughan suggested that the Board have a site visit before
4
• making a decision.
Walter Power agreed that a site visit should be held and the
Board should refer the matter to the Planning Department for
further review.
Chairman Walter Power declared the Public Hearing closed.
FORM C - BERRYWOOD LANE
Linda Vaughan recused herself from discussion of this matter.
Atty. Robert Orsi of Prolog Corp. addressed the Board and
reviewed the history of the subdivision which was approved by
the Planning Board in June of 1986. At the time there were
seven lots, however one lot was released by the Board prior
to the completion of the subdivision. Before the completion
of the subdivision the developer was foreclosed on and Prolog
owns the property now. He also noted that there is pending
litigation concerning the lot that was released and that they
have an appeal outstanding.
Kevin Hines of H & R Survey stated that the grades are original
to the as built plans. He noted that the grades were found
to be matched almost exact except for a couple of spots. He
also stated that the utilities are in place and that the plans
• call for the stairs to the open space. Walter Power requested
that the plans for the stairs to the open space be reviewed
by the City Engineer.
Carter Vinson asked if the plan meets all of the original
conditions. Atty. Orsi noted that the bank never owned lot
number 1 and they don't feel that they should have to maintain
it.
Linda Vaughan, speaking as an abutter, stated that the old
landscaping plan called for a line of trees to be placed between
lot 1 and her property to shield the property. Atty. Orsi stated
that they are willing to do what they can on property that they
own, but they don't feel that they should go onto lot 1 to do
any work. Linda Vaughan noted that the tree buffer zone was
part of the original agreement.
Stan Porier of 8 Cottage Street addressed the Board and stated
that they have battled this project for a long time and they
would be glad to see it finished. He noted that his concern
is that the original conditions of the plan be adhered to, being
that there be no further subdividing of the lots. He also asked
that the board require a bond to insure the completion of the
work.
• Roger Petit addressed the Board and stated that he is concerned
about the wall that was built which is falling down. He also
5
• noted that shrubs were to be planted around the cul-de-sac to
screen the area from lights. It was noted that the planting
is on the plans and they were explained to Mr. Petit.
Arthur Theriault of 41 Greenway Road addressed the Board and
noted that he is concerned about water draining onto his
property.
Peter Baglioni of 6 Castle Road addressed the Board and noted
that he is concerned about drainage as well. He also stated
that he is concerned about blasting when homes are built on
the lots.
Debbie Hilbert noted that blasting would change the topography
of the land. Walter Power suggested that the approval pertinent
to blasting be researched.
Joan Tremblay of 33 Greenway Road noted that she is also
concerned about drainage and that she recalls that blasting
was also included in the plan.
Robert Theriault also noted that he wanted to be sure that the
building restriction line is also still in tact, as it was agreed
to in the original approval.
Atty. Nicholas DeCoulas addressed the Board on behalf of his
• clients David and Dannette Schrader. He noted that they do
not feel that the original plan should be forgotten since it
has not been rescinded and that the plan should be completed
in accordance with the plan and enforce the covenant.
Atty. Orsi stated that he has stated Prologs position and that
the litigation would be decided by the courts.
Walter Power read comments from the Fire Department and the
Board of Health and they both concurred with the project.
Walter Power suggested that the matter be referred to the
Planning Department for further review and made a recommendation.
WETLAND ND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT - CLARK AVENUE - JULIE
ARMSTRONG RONALD MENTO
E
Julie Armstrong addressed the Board and presented plans for
work she needs to do on her property located on Clark Avenue.
She explained that her plan is the similar to the plan approved
for Paul Claveau. Her property is presently undeveloped, and
she needs to correct the slope and prevent erosion, caused by
fill that was placed on her property by David Colpitts. Ms.
Armstrong reviewed her plans which call for maintenance of an
existing siltation fence and haybales until all vegetation has
• been established on the fill slope, removal of sediment deposits
along the toe of the existing slope and along the siltation
6
• fence. Construction of a swale along the tope of the slope
which will connect with abutters swale (Paul Claveau) and direct
it to a rip rap stilling basin at the bottom of the slope, and
runoff to pass through a catch basin with a sump to collect
sediment. They propose to cut back the existing slope to 2:1
grade and compact, loam and seed a minimum of 4" thick and
install erosion control/revegetation blanket.
Debbie Hurlburt noted that the Conservation Commission has issued
an Order of Conditions (64-204) on April 23, 1992. She also
stated that a draft set of conditions for this project had been
prepared in case the board wanted to approve the permit this
evening.
Chuck Puleo asked if any materials need to be removed from the
site. Julie Armstrong replied that material would be removed
if necessary.
Walter Power reviewed comments from other Boards and departments:
The Board of Health, and the Building Inspector concur with
the plans.
Debbie Hurlburt reviewed the proposed conditions for the project.
David Hart expressed his concern that the City Engineer should
review the plans, and that he was opposed to approving the plan
• tonight.
Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the plan conditional
upon review by the City Engineer, seconded by Chuck Puleo and
approved unanimously.
DISCUSSION WITH ATTORNEY JOHN KEILTY REGARDING FREEMAN ROAD
Chuck Puleo reused himself from discussion of this matter.
Atty. John Keilty addressed the Board regarding a proposed
development on Freeman Road, which will require a T or Hammer
Head Turnaround. He noted that the area is inclusive of a
wetland and he would like to know the requirements of the
Planning Board before they approach the Con Com. He explained
that they would need about 22 feet of pavement and wanted to
know if that was adequate. He also noted that the need a
turnaround.
Walter Power suggested that the Board visit the site. A visit
was scheduled for July 18, 1992 at 10:15 a.m.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
John Moustakis reported that he spoke to Mayor Harrington and
the city is moving forward with taking the parcel of land on
the North River, for non payment of taxes.
7 -
• APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The approval of the minutes of the meeting the meeting of June
18, 1992 was postponed until the next meeting of the Planning
Board.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting a motion was made by John Moustakis to
adjourn the meeting, seconded by Linda Vaughan and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 11 :00 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB071692
•
8
9 ('gity of 'Saleri1, �fflassac4usBtts
(One 0alem (green .
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting
scheduled for Thursday, July 2, 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. in the
second floor conference room at One Salem Green has been
canceled.
- Walter B. Power , III
Chairperson
•
r
ex/dh/cancl72
Ff llb iSe �S6�eli '&i 7tAf.4fef1L1 X11TIMil Bb V
;pity all Ave. , Salem, Mass. on ,.19
49 J /7J in accorda.nc witih Chap. 626 .
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 1992
• A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, June 18, 1992, at 7:30 P.M. , in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, David Hart, Carter
Vinson, John Moustakis, Albert Hill, Chuck Puleo, and Debbie
Hilbert. Also present were Assistant City Planner Beth Debski,
Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk. Salem City Councillor
Jane Stirgwolt was also in attendance.
CLIPPER SHIP INN - REQUEST TO DEVIATE FROM LANDSCAPE PLAN
Peter DiMeo representing the Clipper Ship Inn addressed the
Board and stated that they are having trouble getting the 312
- 4 inch calliper trees that were approved in their landscape
plans. He stated that they would be unable to get them until
next spring and requested that they be allowed to change some
of the trees in the plan to 212 inch calliper which they can•
get right away. He also proposed moving some trees to the front
of the property.
Walter Power stated that he would like to see the project
completed this year.
David Hart stated that he would like to see a revised landscape
• plan so that the board can see what the proposed changes will
look like before approving the change. Debbie Hurlburt noted
that Bill Luster wants to see the trees set back rather than
removed from the property. David Hart also expressed concern
over the screening for the dumpster area and requested a sketch
of the area. He also questioned the use of ' lint pac on the
area where the buses will be parking and suggested that it should
be paved. Mr. Daly stated that buses would only be parking
there if needed.
Debbie Hilbert agreed that the dumpster area should be screened.
She also noted that since the property is along an entrance
corridor it would be nice to have trees along the street.
Walter Power suggested that the Board allow the change in the
size of the trees from 31 inches to 212 inches, and come to the
next meeting with a sketch of the dumpster area and the vehicle
parking plan. David Hart stated that he has no problem with
the size difference.
Motion made by David Hart to change 8 trees from 31 inch calliper
to 212 inch calliper trees and eliminate 1 tree on the island
seconded by John Moustakis and approved with Chuck Puleo
abstaining.
1
Mr. DiMeo will work with the Planning Department on the dumpster
area and the vehicle parking plan and present it at the next
• meeting.
DISCUSSION WITH COLLEEN BRUCE OF THE SALEM MARITIME NATIONAL
PARK SERVICE REGARDING A CHAPTER 91 LICENSE APPLICATION.
Debbie Hilbert and David Hart recused themselves from discussion
of this matter.
Colleen Bruce, of the National Park Service addressed the Board
and explained the proposed dredging and rehabilitation of the
wharves at the NPS Historic Site located at Derby Wharf. The
proposed use of the structure or fill is to stabilize the
existing wharves, and to enhance the public access to waterfront
open space. The NPS has applied for a Chapter 91 Waterways
License and the Board had 30 days to comment from May 15, 1992.
Albert Hill recommended that they be required to keep the streets
clean throughout the project since they will be trucking material
from the site.
Colleen Bruce noted that the material needs to be dewatered
so, that it will be mostly dry when it is trucked from the site.
Walter Power noted that the time of day that the trucking occurs
is critical and should be done during non peak hours of traffic.
He also noted that the route taken to leave the city should
• be mapped out carefully. Ms. Bruce noted that they plan to
use the same route that SESD uses.
David Hart asked if the vehicles would be washed before they
pull out onto Derby Street. Ms. Bruce stated that the contractor
will know that the material cannot leak throughout the city.
Councillor Stirgwolt asked if the trucks would be covered.
Ms. Bruce stated that they have to be covered.
C)9 Zat-er/Ltu Vinson suggested that mid size dump trucks shou be d.
� use
y � -�
Walter Power noted that he is concerned about the material flying
around during transportation. Ms. Bruce stated that the material
will be mushy and that should not be a problem.
Albert Hill suggested that delivery times should be worked out
so that they don't interfere with traffic, and suggested that
a holding area such as Riley Plaza be used to hold the deliveries
until after rush hour in the morning. Ms. Bruce stated that
it could be addressed with the contractor.
Jane Stirgwolt noted that the area is congested and that it
will be difficult for big trucks to make the turns on the
streets.
2
Ms. Bruce stated that the contractor will be required to follow
local regulations and that the NPS will see to it that they
do. 1N "nl1
• DISCUSSION - SALEM HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN - DON RIT��
Don Garrity of Salem Hospital addressed the Planning Board to
inform them of some of the plans that the hospital has for
renovations, and to present a proposed Master Plan. He noted
that a high priority is the development of a new Emergency
Room. He also noted that the need for outpatient care is
becoming necessary, and more procedures are requiring shorter
stays in the hospital. He showed the Board a sketch of the
proposed Master Plan.
David Hart asked if there were any plans concerning parking.
Mr. Garrity noted that there are still 60 -80 spaces left in
the new parking area. Debbie Hilbert asked about employee
parking. Mr. Garrity stated that they now have 700 parking
spaces to accommodate employees.
Mr. Garrity also stated that the reason that they are planning
to locate the day care center off campus is that they don't
have the space available. He also stated that the Hospital
would be maintaining ownership of the land on Colby Street,
but would be leasing the property to a private Day Care provider.
Carter Vinson asked if the Hospital had considered moving some
• of the offices from the hospital to other areas of the city.
Mr. Garrity stated that they try to move as much as they can
but it would be inefficient to move all of the offices from
the campus. He noted that they have offices in Peabody and
they have moved the adult day care center to the Shetland
Properties.
Mr. Garrity also stated that the hospital is always looking
for property around the campus for expansion and noted that
the Titus building is up for sale and they are interested in
that property.
Walter Power asked if the new emergency room building would
have the potential to become a high rise. Mr. Garrity stated
that it could carry a total of 4 floors, for flexibility for
the future.
Mr. Garrity also noted that a parking study is being done to
see how they can improve parking. David Hart asked if they
have any data on traffic turnaround. Mr. Garrity stated that
a space turns over 5 times per 8 hour period.
Walter Power noted that the Board is considering specific zoning
changes around the hospital and asked if there was anything
that they thought should be considered. Mr. Garrity stated
3
•
that there was nothing that he was aware of.
DISCUSSION OF MASTER PLAN
• Assistant City Planner Beth Debski addressed the Board and stated
that after reviewing the concerns of the Board from previous
discussions. She noted that there was concern that there were
too many sub-committees and proposed eliminating them and
recommended the appointment of a single Master Plan Committee
comprised as follows:
Planning Board -----3 members / chairman and 2 designees
City Council -----2 designees of the President
Conservation Comm --1
SRA -----1
School Dept. -----1
Board of Appeal-----1
Citizens at Large---2 appointed by the Mayor
Debbie Hilbert asked if other members of the Planning Board
could attend meetings other than the Committee members. She
stated that 3 members was a small representation of the Planning
Board. Beth Debski stated that she did not see why they couldn't
attend. Debbie Hilbert also requested that the Board be notified
of topics of interest when they are going to be discussed.
David Hart stated that he felt strongly that the Committee should
consider public participation. He noted that the business
• community should be involved. Beth Debski stated that they
could get that from the Chamber of Commerce or the Salem
Partnership.
Debbie Hilbert also noted that they could have a scoping session
and advertise it in the newspaper to bring it to the attention
of the public and get ideas from them.
John Moustakis suggested reviewing the existing Master Plan
to see what things were not implemented and why, before the
new plan is devised.
Walter Power noted that action strategy's are not spelled out
in the MasterPlan. He noted that previously they had the
business people come into address their needs.
Debbie Hilbert noted that she feels that the businesses should
be represented. David Hart agreed noting that there are
different types of businesses in the city and that they should
give their ideas to the Committee. Debbie Hilbert suggested
that a Real Estate representative should also be considered.
Carter Vinson suggested that a representative of the banking
community should also be considered.
4
•
Walter Power stated that perhaps those businesses could be
covered by a representative of the Chamber or the Partnership.
He agreed that a Commercial Real Estate person would know the
• changing needs of the City, and the Partnership knows the needs
of the downtown.
Carter Vinson suggested that the meeting should be open and
that the agenda be posted to inform the public of the topics
being discussed.
Jane Stirgwolt stated that she felt that the public should be
kept apprised through the news papers and should be allowed
to attend and comment. She also stated that she felt that the
city should plan more for the tax base, noting that it was
revealed at this meeting by Salem Hospital is looking to buy
the Titus property. That purchase would take the Titus property
off the tax rolls since Salem Hospital doesn't pay taxes.
Beth Debski also informed the Board that EOCD has a new grant
program available to study land use and that while it cannot
be used to fund the Master Plan is can be used for components
of it. The maximum amount that can be applied for is $30,000,00.
She noted that the deadline for the application is July 17,
and that a draft package is being prepared for approval by the
City Council.
David Hart suggested that possible representatives to consider
are from the College, Museums, Public Safety/ Police & Fire,
• Visitation, and the National Park Service.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Debbie Hurlburt informed the members that Lenny Femino has issued
a decision regarding Sable Heights and that they will have to
file for a Form C with the Planning Board.
Debbie also informed the Board that the Public Hearing for the
Salem Acres Superfund site would be held on June 24, 1992.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of May 21 , 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the minutes
of the meeting of May 21 , 1992, seconded by John Moustakis and
approved unanimously.
It was decided that there would be no Planning Board meeting
on July 2, 1992, but a special meeting would be held on Thursday
July 30, 1992 to since the Gables Plan would be heard on July
16, 1992 and the Board needs to act on it.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting a motion was made by John Moustakis to
5
•
r
�J adjourn the meeting seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved
O b ! unanimously.
� • The meeting was adjourned at 11 :00 P.M.
>o
° \", RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB061892
s
6
•
e�
�' ..'
��
9' - y ,—
, �
., ' l
rn
� � `� �
� � � � � }� �
��,
. � � - .
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
• MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, June 4 , 1992 , at 7 : 30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, Chuck
Puleo, Carter Vinson, Albert Hill ( 8: 30 ) , and Kosta Prentakis
( 9 :00 ) . Also present were City Planner William Luster, Debbie
Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
Chairman Walter Power called the meeting to order at 7 : 30 P.M.
and welcomed new member Carter Vinson to the Planning Board.
While the Board awaited the arrival of two members to make a
quorum, City Planner William Luster discussed various projects
with the members. He briefed the Board on discussions that
he and Walter have had regarding a city wide connected walkway
system. He also talked about the Master Plan and noted that
Councillor Stirgwolt has shown an interest in working on the
Plan. He also noted that he had sent a memo to the City Council
and has had no response. Bill also informed the Board that
the Campbell Plan for traffic will be the subject of a Public
Hearing on June 15, 1992 . He also stated that he has met with
most of the Ward Councillors, whose wards are affected by the
• plan and the reaction has been favorable to it, with the
exception of the rerouting of 114 .
Bill Luster also reported that the ground breaking for the Riley
Plaza project would be held on Tuesday. He explained that the
first 5 or 6 months of construction would take place within
Riley Plaza and should not interfere with the tourist season.
He also noted that possible detours from Jefferson Ave. to
Jackson Street, and at the Salem News, should last about 2-3
days each.
FORM A - LORING HILLS AVENUE AND CAROL WAY
Mr. Zeiff was present at the meeting to request approval of
a Form A, for 7 Loring Hills Ave. He explained that the lot
is 4 .9 acres and that he wants to subdivide 2 acres for the
construction of the Nursing Home, noted as lot D1 on the plan.
He noted that he wants to transfer ownership of the parcel to
the owners of the Nursing Home. Chuck Puleo asked if the Street
was a Public Way. Chuck Puleo aslso asked if they had approved
the subdivision when the site plan review was approved. Bill
Luster noted that the subdivision was not approved.
Motion made by Chuck Puleo to approve the Form A for 7 Loring
Hills Ave. , seconded by Linda Vaughan and approved unanimously.
• 1
.a
CONTINUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT - CLARK
AVENUE - PAUL CLAVEAU
• Atty. Ellen Winkler addressed the Board and reviewed the plans
for those who were not familiar with them. Walter Power
suggested that all of the owners of the lots involved should
get together to solve the problem, and save costs. Atty. Winkler
stated that ideally they would like to do that, but not all
of the parties are in a position to do so and her client has
spent a lot of time and money on his property. She also noted
that the Armstrongs have filed a Notice of Intent with the
Conservation. Commission and that they may be able to work with
her.
Bill Luster noted that the two owners are trying to deal with
the situation, and he doesn 't think that Mr. Colpitts can fix
the damage financially. He noted that he has met with Mr.
Colpitts on several occasions, but never get him to do anything
about it. Atty. Winkler added that the drainage calculations
have been done as if nothing else would be done to the neighbors
property, and they can handle the water on the property.
Mr. Nicholas Fiore who owns the property next to Mr. Claveau,
expressed his concerns about his property being lower than the
Claveau' s and that they would like to see a retaining wall built
to keep the water from his property. Atty. Winkler explained
that the plans call for them to gradually slope their property
• within their own lot. Mr. Fiore also expressed concern about
excess fill and what would be done with it. Atty. Winkler
stated that they must remove excess fill, using it only to fill
in depressed areas that need to be filled. She also noted that
while this may not bee the ideal solution to the problem, it
is the only alternative these people have. She also suggested
that the Board could place a condition that the grade of the
property could not be elevated any more than proposed. Linda
Vaughan stated that she did not think that was necessary.
Walter Power noted that this property was filled without approval
after the subdivision was approved and is in violation.
Chuck Puleo noted that David Hart was concerned about the
stability of the slope. It was noted that the Conservation
Commission accepted it. It was also noted that the Conservation
Commission did not order testing of the fill because there was
no evidence that there was anything wrong with it, other that
the purpose for which it was used.
Bill Luster clarified the statement that Will Beaulieu was aware
of the filling. He noted that he tried to stop it, but by the
time they got to it, it was too late. He also reviewed the
list of draft conditions for the project.
Motion made by Chuck Puleo, to close the public hearing, seconded
• 2
by Kosta Prentakis and approved unanimously.
• Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the plan for Clark
Avenue, with all of the conditions as drafted, seconded by Chuck
Puleo and approved unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Linda Vaughan informed the members that the Conservation
Commission had approved the Salem Hospital Day Care Center and
that the neighbors plan to appeal it to DEP. She also noted
that they would be coming to the Planning Board for a Special
Permit. She asked the members to review the material for the
project thoroughly, since this is a hot issue in the
neighborhood.
Linda Vaughan also suggested that the Planning Board cookout
could be held on August 27, 1992 at 7:00 at her house.
The members discussed the possibility of canceling the July
21 1992 meeting. If there are no matters to address the meeting
could be canceled.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of May 21 , 1992 will be considered
at the next meeting.
• There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Linda Vaughan to
adjourn the meeting, seconded by Chuck Puleo.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
, j
EE L SACCO, CLERK
PB060492
• 3
r1
. SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, MAY 21 , 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, May 21 , 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Linda Vaughan, Debbie Hilbert, David Hart,
Kosta Prentakis, John Moustakis, and Albert Hill. Also present
were Debbie Huriburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
In the absence of Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan assumed
the chair for this meeting.
FORM A - 234 ESSEX STREET
Attorney Scott Grover addressed the Board and asked for approval
of a Form A for property located at 234 Essex Street. He
explained that the Planning Board had approved a lot line change
in September of 1988, with the intention that the building would
be demolished. Those plans never materialized and as the lot
line now runs through the middle of the building, the new plan
calls for deleting the lot line change from the plan presented
• in 1988 back to its original lot area. He also noted that the
plans are for the building to be sold as commercial condos.
Kosta Prentakis asked if they have any plans to finish the facade
of the building. Atty. Grover stated that the facade should
be completely shortly.
There being no further questions or comments from those present,
a motion was made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the Form A for
234 Essex Street, seconded by David Hart and approved
unanimously.
WETLAND AND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT - PAUL CLAVEAU, CLARK
AVENUE
Atty. Ellen Winkler of Serafini, Serafini, and Darling addressed
the Board on behalf of her clients, Paul and Nancy Claveau.
She reviewed the history of the property and noted that the
Claveau' s purchased the property in September of 1988 from David
Colpitts, with the intent of building a single family home on
it. Subsequent to the purchase Mr. Colpitts apparently caused
large quantities of fill to be placed on the property, within
the wetland area and buffer zone, without the knowledge or
consent of the Claveau' s.
Atty. Winkler reviewed the plans with the Board which call for:
• 1 . Maintenance of an existing siltation fence and hay bails
1
J
until vegetation has been established on the fill slope
2 . Construction of an intercepting swale at the top of the
slope to intercept runoff and direct it to a rip rap stilling
basin at the bottom of the slope, said runoff to pass through
a catch basin with a sump pump to collect sediment.
3 . Cutback of existing slope to 2 to 1 .
4 . Slope to be loamed and seeded, and revegetated mat to be
installed to permit a grass slope to become established.
Atty. Winkler also noted that the Conservation Commission issued
an order of Conditions for the plan on April 23, 1992 ( i164-203 ) .
She also noted that since there is a cease and desist order
on the property, nothing can be done and her client has spent
alot of money trying to get this matter settled.
Paul Claveau noted that the fill that was placed on his property
came from Cambridge and not Deer Island as was the case on some
lots.
David Hart expressed concern that this solution could affect
the neighbors.
Kosta Prentakis asked Mr. Claveau what his relationship is at
• present with Mr. Colpitts. Mr. Claveau stated that they have
no relationship and he is not at present suing.
John Moustakis suggested that the Board have a site visit, before
making a decision.
Linda Vaughan reviewed the Order of Conditions issued by the
Conservation Commission. She also reviewed comments from the
Board of Health, and the City Engineer.
Mr. Nicholas Fiore, who owns the lot next to Mr. Claveau
addressed the Board and explained that he was present when the
fill was placed on his property and stopped it. He noted that
he lives there in the Summer and in Florida in the winter and
when he returned from Florida more fill had been placed there.
Mrs. Fiore noted her concern about having to pay for the removal
of the fill since the are retired.
Debbie Hilbert asked if the fill was hazardous . Atty. Winkler
stated that they are not aware of any hazardous materials.
Albert Hill questioned why there was no soil testing performed
on the property.
The Board set a date for a site visit on Thursday evening May
• 28, 1992 at 6: 30 P.M.
A motion was made by David Hart to continue to Public Hearing
2
;r
until the next meeting of the Board after the site visit,
• seconded by John Moustakis and approved unanimously.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Kosta Prentakis asked about the status of the back entrance
to Shaw' s Supermarket. Debbie Hurlburt reported that there
has been no progress.
Kosta Prentakis also asked if the Planning Board would get to
review the proposed Taco Bell, under the entrance corridor
district. Debbie Hurlburt stated that they are just under
to square footage to be reviewed by the Board. She noted that
they will get to determine signage and landscaping.
Kosta Prentakis also suggested that the Board request that the
Ground Round install a stop sign from their parking lot, out
to Traders Way.
John Moustakis asked if the city had made any progress regarding
the barge in the North River. Linda Vaughan stated that as
noted in previous meetings, the City plans to take the land
eventually. John Moustakis suggested that the city or the state
place Jersey barriers to stop access to the property.
Linda Vaughan suggested that a letter be sent to the Mayor
• suggesting the barriers, and have his office handle it.
Linda Vaughan informed the members that the Salem Hospital Day
Care Center is a hot issue and asked that the members review
a list of the concerns of the neighbors, since the matter will
be before the Board for a wetland special permit.
Debbie Hurlburt informed the Board that the name of Thistle
Way was not approved by the Fire Department and the Council
will have to recind the approval of it. She stated that the
new name proposed could be America Way.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of March 19, 1992 were presented
for approval. Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the
minutes of the meeting of March 19, 1992, seconded by David
Hart and approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of May 7, 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the minutes
of the meeting of May 7, 1992, seconded by John Moustakis and
approved unanimously.
• There being no further business to come before the Planning
3
Board at this meeting a motion was made by Debbie Hilbert to
adjourn the meeting, seconded by John Moustakis and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 9 :00 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB052192
•
• 4
r'
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
• THURSDAY, MAY 7, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, May 7, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor conference
room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Linda Vaughan, Kosta Prentakis, Debbie
Hilbert, David Hart, Chuck Puleo and Albert Hill. Also present
were Debbie Hurlburt and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
In the absence of Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan assumed
the Chair.
DISCUSSION OF ACCESS ROAD NAME
Debbie Hurlburt explained that Mr. Zieff Trustee for Vinnin
Associates Realty Trust had submitted the name of Columbia Court
for approval of the Planning Board of an roadway accessing the
planned condominium units off Weatherly Drive at the Village
of Vinnin. She also noted that City Clerk Josephine Fusco is
concerned that there are already two somewhat similar names
of streets in the City, Columbus Avenue and Columbus Square.
She also noted that Mr. Zeiff has changed his request to Thistle
Way and Mrs. Fusco has no problem with that.
• Motion made by David Hart to approve the name of Thistle Way
for the access road, seconded by Kosta Prentakis and approved
unanimously.
FORM A - VALLEY STREET - MR. GALLO
Debbie Hurlburt explained that this request was approved by
the Planning Board in 1990 and that at the time Mr. Gallo did
not realize that he needed to provide more information on the
plans for land court. She presented new plans with the required
information for land court, for the approval and signature of
the Board.
Motion made by Debbie Hilbert to approve the Form A, for parcels
82C and 82D on Valley Street, seconded by David Hart and approved
unanimously.
OLD / NEW BUSINESS
The Board members reviewed the letter that was sent by City
Assessor Peter Caron concerning the barge in the North River
and the ownership of the property. It was discovered that the
property was dropped from the tax rolls in 1956 for no reason
and was placed back on the rolls in 1992, although the
whereabouts of the owner is unknown. David Hart noted that
• the City could take the property for non payment of taxes.
' It was also noted that the occupant could try to take it by
adverse possession.
• The Board reviewed the agenda for the Board of Appeal meeting
on May 20, 1992. Linda Vaughan urged members to attend the
meetings of the Board on issues that concern them.
Kosta Prentakis reported that they have completed the survey
at the Fafard Condominiums as follows:
Children: .52 per unit - 59 children total ages- 36 under 12
and 23 over the age of 12.
Cars: 1 .8 cars per unit - counted 63 and 66 on two separate
occasions
The survey was based on responses from 112 or 128 units surveyed.
The Board reviewed the letter that was sent to Mr. Fafard since
the last discussion of the project. Debbie noted that she has
received calls from residents of the Hamblet with some of the
same concerns as the Board, and she has suggested that they
write letters to the Board
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of April 2, 1992 were presented for
approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the Minutes
. of the meeting of April 2, 1992 as amended, seconded by Chuck
Puleo and approved unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by Kosta Prentakis
to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
?Lb � A4-12�
EIUEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB050792
Ctv of ttlent, tt�sttcl��zsE##s
n
s
Planning PDarl
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting
scheduled for Thursday, April 16, 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. in the second
floor conference room at One Salem Green has been canceled.
Walter B. Power ,- IIIQQ�k
• Chairman
EX\DH\CANCL416
This ,notice posst�(J. •.,n r! i inial Bulletin Bon:.a®"
#ity`Hall Ave . , ;;- .em, Mass . on. .. Pn�/
t• :Y'/Pd7 in' accordance with Caap'. 624 . .
b° the Acte of 1958 .
`�b+yC1�� wCr
C to of �Sttlent, 1 ssMrlluse##
q
;�J�� _' p �Mttnnin� �nttrl
(One JttMem (Breen
NOTICE OF MEETING
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will
hold its regular meeting on Thursday, April 2, 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. in
the second floor conference room at One Salem Green.
Vl j l iX lQ/`� LR1 wt-ZLIOA W
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
C�
TENTATIVE AGENDA:
1 . Discussion with Phase II residents of Fafard Development
2 . Discussion of the Master Plan
3 . Old/New Business
4 . Approval of Minutes
EX\DH\AGN4292
' SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF APRIL 2, 1992 REGULAR MEETING
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on Thursday,
April 2, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. On the second floor at One Salem
Green, Salem, MA.
Present were: Chairman Walter Power, Michael Cunningham, David
Hart, Debbie Hilburt, Albert Hill, John Moustakis, Rosta Prentakis,
Chuck Puleo, Planning Administrator Debra Hurlburt, Beth Debski
of the Planning Department, and Debra Tucker, Acting Clerk.
Walter Power stated that there is a Public Hearing scheduled
for April 7, 1992 regarding the bridge reconstruction at Bridge
and Webb Streets. He asked Debra Hurlburt and Beth Debski what
the plans were for the area concerning filling the railroad
bed. They replied that they did not know what the intent was,
but that they would find out the next day. Mr. Power said that
the matter directly involves the Planning Board since the intent
was to have a recreational path from the Willows area through
Ward 2 along the North River and into Ward 6. He added that
there was explicit use of that corridor of the right of way
spelled out in the Master Plan. Albert Hill added that the
• Cross St. bridge was deemed unsafe, removed and the area filled.
Walter Powers felt that this is an issue that should be addressed
by the Planning Board. He also stated that the Planning Board
looks to the Planning Department as the keeper of the City' s
Master Plan and that they should have input into the process.
Walter Power opened the meeting.
DISCUSSION: FAFARD DEVELOPMENT PHASE II RESIDENTS
Walter Power stated that the Planning Board had received a letter
from Anthony Miraglia asking that the Fafard Development Phase
II Residents be allowed to speak at the meeting.
Mr. Miraglia stated that he and his group were before the board
to ask some questions and to present some possible suggestions
for the future development of Phase III of the Fafard site.
He asked what the construction schedule for the completion of
Whaler' s Lane was. Since the majority of the construction is
to be done to the South, the residents are requesting that the
street, sidewalk, and landscaping work .be completed soon. They
are concerned that an extension for construction until 1997
has been awarded. They do not want to wait five years for these
improvements and suggest that they be done first and that con-
struction site access for Phase III be gained from Swampscott
• Rd.
• Page 2 of 7
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting 4-02-92
Walter Power answered that the Planning Board does not have
the actual time schedule as yet. He stated that he felt the
board would require that Phase II be completed quickly as a
condition to beginning Phase III and that access to Phase III
be from Swampscott Rd. Anthony Miraglia said that it is good
that the Planning Board agrees with the group' s interests.
John Moustakis added that the developer should be asked about
the widening of Swampscott Rd. as well. David Hart said that
the Planning Department and the Planning Board should have very
detailed discussions with the developer, and that the residents
should not have to live with the unfinished conditions for ten
years.
Irene Kastrinakis stated that the group intended to speak with
the Planning Board, the Mayor, and Howard Fafard regarding design
concerns for Phase III and public input into that matter before
the actual site plan is finished. The group would develop a
list of design suggestions.
John Erickson of 12 Lightening Lane (Phase II) addressed the
board. He said that he has lived at the hamlet since May of
1988. Mr. Erickson wanted to make the board aware of some dif-
ficulties such as the number of people, children, and cars that
are part of the development. He briefly talked with Howard
Fafard who encouraged the group to get involved in the planning
process. They hope that the result will be a better development.
Design issues, the sequence of construction, and the parking
problems are all concerns. He added that there is no parking
on the side streets which are not wide enough to accomodate
this. Many park on Whaler' s Lane, which in turn makes the parking
there tighter. Additional parking in the new phase is a suggestion.
Walter Power asked what their suggestion was. He stated that
the plan was that there are garages for every unit. He asked
if the residents were using the garages as storage and using
the street for parking. John Erickson replied that he did not
think that this was the problem. He stated that though it can
become inconvenient to switch cars back and forth in front of
the garage, there are more cars per unit and many visitors that
must use the streets. Anthony Miraglia added that these extra
cars end up on Whaler' s Lane. He said that maybe the problem
cannot be solved for Phase I and II, but could be avoided in
Phase III. Walter Power stated that the Planning Board had
been told that the parking would be adequate. Walter Power
questioned whether an unrealistic model was developed regarding
the number of cars per unit. He asked for the number of cars
in the development for use in planning Phase III. Irene Kastrinakis
• felt that more cars and more children need to be expected for
Phase III. Walter Power stated that the original development
' Page 3 of 7
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting 4-02-92
was planned for a population of mostly adults and asked that
the group get some statistics on the actual population there.
John Erickson asked for a tot lot in Phase III since there have
been requests for it. Walter Power said that passive recreation
had been planned for Phase I and that the top of the hill was
to be kept free for walking paths. The area is not in any condition
for that kind of usage. Mr. Power asked that the original plans
and drawings be 'found. Irene Kastrinakis added that these intended
walking paths between developments do not exist since there
are obstacles such as air conditioner units and shrubs that
virtually eliminate any paths.
John Erickson said that the group understood that the bankruptcy
claim caused a lot of the problems. Walter Power welcomed the
group' s constructive criticism. The group discussed the idea
of a tot lot further. David Hart suggested thinking in terms
of recreation areas rather than just a tot lot.
Debbie Hurlbuit reported that there are approximately 300 units
built of the total 520 in the project. Walter Power said that
the board must keep in mind that the developer has been allowed
a certain number of units. These must be balanced out. Any
' increase in open areas would mean a possible increase in building
size. The building design and open area space are dependent
upon each other.
John Erickson said that although there was little snow this
winter, snow removal is a problem on the side streets. There
is no place to plow the snow. Also unit numbering is not visible
from the street and makes it a problem finding the right address.
Another issue brought up by the group was that of the intersection
at First St. and Trader' s Way. There have been a number of
accidents and many near accidents. Walter Power added that
the Swampscott Rd./First St. intersection is dangerous as well.
Mr. Fafard informed the board at the last meeting that he intended
to widen the road soon. Mr. Power added that it would have
to occur before the next construction phase.
The group also reported that the area is dark with few lights.
John Moustakis agreed. David Hart suggested that the group
also contact Councillor Furfaro with their concerns since it
is part of his purview to deal with issues such as traffic and
lighting. Mr. Miraglia asked if Whaler' s Lane would eventually
become a City street. Walter Power answered that it would if
the City accepts the road upon completion of .the project.
Irene Kastrinakis said that the group was looking to the board
' for support in case Fafard renegs. She thanked the board for
listening and asked that they keep them in mind when giving
• Page 4 of 7
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting 4-02-92
out permits and reviewing plans. They are happy to help or
give any input. David Hart asked that the group provide the
board with written information and statistics on occupants,
cars, children, etc. Walter Power asked that information of
garage usage also be provided. Mr. Erickson replied that they
would and that they currently have circulated'a questionaire
to the residents. Mr. Power said that the board needs this
information as realistic planning factors for future decisions.
David Hart asked what the Fafard schedule was. Walter Power
replied that he is due before the board this spring and that
he hopes to begin construction in June.
Kosta Prentakis told Chuck Puleo that the PUD supercedes zoning.
David Hart stated that 520 units with no recreational areas
may create a problem and this issue should be explored with
the developer. Walter Power expressed concern that the area
designated for open space was not kept open. Everyone was supposed
to have access. David Hart said that the area chosen was isolated
and very near some condos. There could be a problem with unsuper-
vised activity there.
Kosta Prentakis suggested designing better driveway areas in
Phase III as a possible answer to the parking problem since
• there are no planned common parking areas for Phase III. Walter
Power commented that this would cut down on the green spaces.
There will have to be very careful layout. Chuck Puleo added
that the current planned open space is useless. David Hart
suggested letting Howard Fafard know ahead of time about any
concerns and suggestions so that some creative planning can
be done in advance. Beth Debski said that the Planning Department
could send him a letter now to let him know ahead of time of
the concerns of the board and that he should address these in
the planning of Phase III and IV. Walter Power stated that
the areas of general concern are recreational open spaces, width
of driveways, and adequate parking. This information he felt
would affect the design of the buildings.
John Moustakis told the board that the road between Purity Supreme
and Burger King was in bad condition with large potholes. Beth
Debski said that the Caldor shopping center company was liable.
DISCUSSION: CITY MASTER PLAN
Beth Debski presented the Planning Department ' s suggested ideas
for a new City Master Plan. The Planning Department hopes to
incorporate existing studies and plans into the new plan. New
state legislation outlines nine steps for the plan. One of
Beth Debski' s suggestions was to set up committees for the project.
' She distributed copies of the current Master Plan compiled in
1979 and presented the nine steps:
' Page 5 of 7
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting 4-02-92
1. Goals and Policies
2. Land Use Element
3. Housing
4. Economic Development
5. Natural and Cultural Resources
6. Open Space and Recreation
7. Service and Facilities
8. Circulation
9. Implementation Program
In response to Chuck Puleo' s question Beth Debski suggested
that the Planning Department may want to look at what is left
to do from the old plan and set realistic goals. She added
that all future City Planning will come from the Master Plan.
The development of the plan will be a very public process.
She sees the plan being completed in approximately 18 months.
Debbie Hilbert asked about the idea of so many committees.
She said that this seemed cumbersome and that she would rather
see a Master Plan Committee which would work through other depart-
ments. Walter Power said that he understood what she meant.
The last plan was developed with one committee overseeing the
whole project. Beth Debski answered that her time was committed
full time to the development of the Master Plan. David Hart
• commented that the project seemed to be an ambitious one to
be completed within 18 months.
Councillor-at-Large Jane Stirgwolt informed the board that the
the City Council wants to be aware of the plan. She added that
Councillor Harvey chairs the Community Development Subcommittee.
Beth Debski said that the Master Plan is developed through the
Planning Department and the Planning Board and though it requires
only Planning Board approval they would like Council backing.
Jane Stirgwolt stated that the Council would like to keep the
Planning Board advised of any needs since Master Planning is
a critical part of the future.
Walter Power said that the board would have to decide if the
Planning Board would be more effective as a body or as committees.
Debra Hilbert suggested Professor George of the Geography department
at Salem State College as a possible resource to assist with
mapping.
Beth Debski stated that the Planning Department' s presentation
and the idea of subcommittees bringing ideas to the Planning
Board was only a suggestion. She added that this is just the
preliminary meeting for discussion purposes. She intended to
give the board information for thought so that suggestions can
be made at the next meeting.
' David Hart asked if the Plan should be advertised so that the
public could get involved. Beth Debski said that the Planning
t
' Page of 7
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting 4-02-92
Department wants the process to be a very public one with as
many people involved as possible. She gave the board a list
of suggested groups that they may want to consider.
Beth Debski responded to Jane Stirgwolt that the new Master
Plan will include more graphics, maps, etc. and less text.
The plan will be more accessible and have realistic goals with
a specific implementation process and timetable.
Walter Power said that future zoning could be developed to go
along with the plan. Beth Debski also asked that the board
consider which areas of the City it wishes to target. Walter
Power stated that the board wants council input with regard
to areas for consideration. Jane Stirgwolt said that she would
refer the matter to the Community Development Committee.
Walter Power asked the board to read the information and familiarize
themselves with it for the next meeting. He said that any ideas
can be discussed at that time.
Mr. Power said that with the last Master Plan the stress was
on Federal grants and that Salem did very well in that area.
While the old Master Plan was good, there was no specific time
' table or use of resources. Jane Stirgwolt said that the economic
plan would be a very critical element of the new plan. David
Hart suggested the input of the Chamber of Commerce and the
Salem Partnership as good sources of information. Debra Hilbert
wants to see an efficient process and that the scope of work
may be able to be narrowed. Beth Debski said that the public
will be given a chance for participation. John Moustakis added
that the Planning Department should check and see what groups
are already in committees.
Jane Stirgwolt addressed the board concerning the public hearing
to be held Tuesday, April 7th regarding the work on the bridge
at Bridge St. and Webb St. Walter Power responded that the
Planning Board had discussed- the matter earlier and was very
concerned about the filling of the area and the traffic effects.
Jane Stirgwolt agreed that there has been very little public
input. She stated that as far as she knew the plan called for
filling in underneath the bridge. Walter Power said that the
Planning department never notified the Planning Board of the
intended filling. Beth Debski stated that the bridge comes
under the jurisdiction of the State DPW who had a two year time-
table. The work is slated to begin within two weeks. David
Hart said that if the area is to be filled then it will no longer
be a bridge. Walter Power asked why the state was being allowed
to take the bridge out if the City is looking for a recreational
use of the area. He asked why the state was not just replacing
the bridge. Jane Stirgwolt stated that anyone is invited to .
attend the meeting but that the intent is to discuss the issue
• Page of 7
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting 4-02-92
of traffic problems for the bridge work and for future traffic
to the construction of the SESD site. She added that the work
on the matter of the bridge appeared to be out of the planning/
comment stage. She said that all she knew of the matter is
that they intended to reconstruct the deck. Beth Debski stated
that she would find out from Bill Luster or Kim Lord and report
to the board. David Hart ask that the board be notified immediately
as to his answer.
OLD BUSINESS
David Hart suggested to Debra Hurlburt that any letters, memos,
and notices that come from the Planning Department have a date
on them. Debra Hurlburt replied that she would make sure that
they do.
Debra Hurlburt presented the Salt Wall Lane Tripartite Agreement
regarding the completion of sidewalks for the Planning Chairman' s
signature. She had made one change suggested by Assistant City
Solicitor Leonard Femino.
Debra Hurlburt read the Board of Appeals' agenda as requested
at the last meeting. She stated that she will present and read
• copies of their agenda as she receives them.
The Planning Board received a letter of reply from the City
Council regarding the request that the proposed street name
of Mussolini Road be reconsidered. The Council has asked for
a reason for the request. John Moustakis suggested that the
Planning Board send a letter asking that the proposed street
be named Leonardo di Vinci Way. The board agreed and directed
Debra Hurlburt to draft that letter.
Assistant City Solicitor Femino sent the Planning Department
a copy of the brief prepared regarding Dinette Schrader of Greenway
Road. The Schraders have filed an appeal which may take 1-2
years to be heard. He stressed the City' s interest in completion
of the project.
John Moustakis asked the status of the Burnham Barge on the
North River. Debra Hurlburt replied that she was drafting a
letter.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board, a motion was made by Michael Cunningham to adjourn the
meeting at 9:58 P.M. Albert Hill seconded the motion, and the
motion was approved unanimously.
. Respectfu11 submitted by:
r
i
Debra A. uc er, Acting Clerk
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
• THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, March 19, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, Debbie
Hilbert, Chuck Puleo, John Moustakis, David Hart, Albert Hill,
and Kosta Prentakis. Also present were, City Planner Bill
Luster, Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
11 SALT WALL LANE - REQUEST FOR WAIVER - CHRISTINE LUTTS
Christine Lutts and Daniel Wolensky addressed the Board to
request a waiver from completion of the asphalt paving that
remains to be done on their property at 11 Salt Wall Lane. Mr.
Wolensky noted that the reason for the delay is that the asphalt
plant does not open until the end of April and they would like
to get an occupancy permit now.
Mr. Wolensky stated that they would like to enter into a tri-
party agreement in the amount of $7,000.00 to cover the cost
of the remaining work. Debbie Hurlburt noted that the amount
• had been verified by Will Beaulieu. The remaining work that
needs to be done is the paving of the street and sidewalk and
• driveway, and the planting of trees.
Kosta Prentakis asked if the road was passable. Debbie Hurlburt
replied that it was.
The Board discussed the length of time that would be sufficient
to complete the work. Albert Hill suggested 90 days, and Mr.
Wolensky stated that would be fine.
Motion made by Albert Hill to grant the waiver and enter into
the tri- party agreement, conditional upon the approval of the
City Solicitor, seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously.
INFORMAL DISCUSSION - FAFARD
Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board and explained that the
City granted a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the Fafard
Companies in 1986 and that the permit is due to expire next
year. He explained the process that was used to come to the
agreement. Atty. Serafini noted that 10 or 11 units remain
unsold to date. He also noted that his client has had financial
difficulties and has had to file bankruptcy, which he is in
the process of reorganizing.
• Howard Fafard addressed the Board and explained that they have
• 1
• sold 50 units per year since 1986 and they would like to begin
phase III of the project. He also noted that he is not looking
• for an increase or decrease in the amount of units.
John Moustakis asked Bill Luster if there were any unfinished
items from Phase 1 & 2 that should be addressed before the Board
approved the extension. Bill Luster stated that legally Mr.
Fafard has satisfied the conditions of the Planning Board.
Chuck Puleo asked if Site Plan Review for phases 3 & 4 could
include addressing the parking situation. Mr. Fafard stated
yes.
Bill Luster noted that the concerns of the City and the residents
would be addressed.
Kosta Prentakis asked if the banks seized the land if the PUD
would still be in existence. Atty. Serafini replied yes. Kosta
Prentakis disagreed that all of the conditions of the Planning
Board had been met, noting that trash compactors were to be
installed in the units and they never were. Bill Luster stated
that the trash compactors were deleted from the project with
the approval of the Planning Board.
David Hart asked if the 7 year length to the PUD was required
by zoning laws. Atty. Serafini stated that the 7 years was
• determined because they felt that they could finish the project
in that amount of time.
• Bill Luster explained the process by which the PUD was determined
and noted that he felt that if the Planning Board did not think
it appropriate to extend the PUD, it would force the Planning
Board to rush SPR for phase 3 & 4 to get it completed before
the PUD expires.
Albert' Hill asked how long of an extension they would need.
Atty. Serafini stated that based on 50 units per year being
built and sold he expected that it would take 41 years through
1997. Atty. Serafini stated that he expects the court to
approve a reorganization plan by mid May.
Debbie Hilbert asked if Mr. Fafard would retain ownership of
the development through 1997. Atty. Serafini stated that the
preliminary approval of the reorganization plan calls for Mr.
Fafard to retain ownership of phase 3 & 4 and to build them.
David Hart noted that there have been issues in phase 1 & 2
that have negative, and gave examples of parking and density.
He asked if those concerns would be taken into consideration
during SPR of phase 3 & 4 . Mr. Fafard stated that in the 10
years that he has been dealing with the Planning Board he has
• been cooperative and has never felt that the Planning Board
asked for anything unreasonable. He also noted that he plans
2
The approval of the minutes of the meeting of February 6, 1992
was postponed until the next meeting of the Planning Board.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by John Moustakis to
adjourn the meeting, seconded Albert Hill and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
Q
EI 'EN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB031992
• q
•
two car garages for each unit and would be willing to address
• other concerns of the city.
• Bill Luster stated that he felt that this is a golden opportunity
to look back and see what was successful and what has been
unsuccessful and address them.
Motion made by David Hart to grant an extension of the PUD with
the Fafard Companies, until December 31 , 1997, seconded by Albert
Hill and approved unanimously.
OLD / NEW BUSINESS
Atty. Serafini informed the Board that the appeal for the Nursing
Home in Vinnin Square was denied and that construction will
go forward.
Atty. Serafini also reported that the Salem Shoe site on Saunders
Street, has only has site work performed and that the project
is at a standstill.
Atty. Serafini also report that Salem Hospital will be before
the Conservation Commission for the construction of the Day
Care Center on Colby Street, soon and will be coming to the
Planning Board to build in the buffer zone. He also noted that
the construction of the Surgicenter is underway, and the next
project they are considering is remodeling the emergency room.
• Debbie Hurlburt reported that the City Council approved the
• name of Carol Way as a street. She also reported that she
received the traffic counts from Mr. Zeiff for
Weatherly Drive.
Kosta Prentakis asked about the status of the speed bump for
the rear of Shaws Supermarket. Debbie reported that they are
drawing up plans and they will submit it to her.
John Moustakis reported that jersey barriers have been moved
next to HMA on North Street, and that there are 3 floats and
a barge located there also. Linda Vaughan noted that there
has been a problem there for a long time and suggested that
a letter be sent to the City Solicitor and the City Assessor
to address the matter.
Chuck Puleo asked about the status of the Mooney Road
subdivision. Bill Luster noted that Lenny Femino is researching
case law on the matter.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of February 20, 1992 were presented
for approval. Motion made by David Hart to approve the Minutes
• of the meeting of February 20 as amended, seconded by Chuck
Puleo and approved unanimously.
• 3
h
IlftTlE1T1� �[bStTCI�TTSEfB
Platuting Pond)
(One Onle tt Grun
CANCELLATION NOTICE
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board meeting
scheduled for Thursday, March 5, 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. has been
canceled.
•
1vu ;b/Q .6.OIAAi1, (/J%Q� d
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
EX\DH\CANC3592
This notiee posted. on "Offiolal Bu 1eVit3 BeeaQ"
• City Pall Ave . , ;"alem, Mass, on e's, rl/
s1k X,7,44ell- 9/ /ffltn accordance with Chap. ett.
of. 00 Acta o� 1958 .
Ctv- of *Ieni, �fflttss*use##s
w Platuting Poartl
NOTICE OF MEETING
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will
hold its regular meeting on Thursday, February 20, 1992 at 7 : 30
p.m. in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green.
Walter B. Power , III
Chairman
•
TENTATIVE AGENDA:
1 . Site Plan Review Discussion - Gauthier Motors, 135 Canal Street
2. Old/New Business
3 . Approval of Minutes
EX\DH\agn22092
•
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
FEBRUARY 20, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, February 20, 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. , in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Linda Vaughan, David Hart, John Moustakis,
Kosta Prentakis, Michael Cunningham, Debbie Hilbert, Chuck Puleo,
and Albert Hill . Also present were City Planner Bill Luster,
Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
In the absence of Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan served
as Acting Chairman for this meeting.
SITE PLAN REVIEW DISCUSSION - GAUTHIER MOTORS, 135 CANAL STREET
Debbie Hurlburt reviewed the concerns of the Board that were
raised at the last meeting on February 6, 1992 , and the
.resolution of them. She noted that there was concern about
the location of the tree at the end of Canal and Laural Street,
as the tree would block the line of vision for drivers of cars
exiting Michaud Glass . The solution to the concern is to remove
two trees along Laural Street and space the remaining 9 trees
• within the planting strip, and in addition, place the removed
trees onto the Canal Street curb line.
Debbie also noted that the location of the dumpster was a concern
and that they have agreed to move the dumpster which was proposed
to be -located adjacent to the building to a new location where
parking space #26 is located on plan dated 1 /8/92 .
Debbie noted that a condition has been included to provide
a landscape architectual element along the curb line in an
attempt to redefine the street line. They have agreed to
construct a planter 6 feet long in the center of the existing
entrance to the building. In this space the removed tree, which
was initially located on the planting strip adjacent to Laural
Street, will be planted.
Atty. Ellen Winkler reviewed the concerns for the Board as well .
Bill Luster noted that the City will be planting trees on Canal
Street, this spring as part of the tree planting program to
augment the tree line.
Chuck Puleo asked about the location of the dumpster in relation
to the closest house. It was estimated that it is about 20
feet and that it will be small, although the exact size has
• not yet been determined.
There being no further questions or comments concerning the
• project, a motion was made by John Moustakis to approve the
site plan review for Gauthier Motors, seconded by Debbie Hilbert
and approved unanimously.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Kosta Prentakis informed the members that the residents of the
Hamlet have settled their dispute with the Fafard Company.
Bill Luster noted that he had submitted a memo to the City
Council concerning the revising of the Master Plan, and expects
to be meeting with the Council soon to discuss it.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of the minutes of the meeting of February 6, 1992 was
postponed until the next meeting on March 4 , 1992 .
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by David Hart to adjourn
the meeting, seconded by Michael Cunningham, and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 7 : 51 P.M.
• RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB022092
gi#u of MlPztt, Httssttrl�LISP##�
' � � �ltttming �uttril
(Dne Salem Green
NOTICE OF MEETING
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will
hold its regular meeting on Thursday, February 6, 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m.
in the second floor conference room at One Salem Green.
al a�
Walter B. Power , III cN
Chairman
•
TENTATIVE AGENDA:
1 . Site Plan Review - Gauthier Motors, 135 Canal Street
2. Village at Vinnin Square - Amended Plan Discussion
3 . Subdivision at Sable Heights - Discussion with Patrick and
Frank DeIulis
4. Old/New Business
5 . Approval of Minutes
EX\DH\agn2692
•
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF .MEETING
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1992 fs
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, February 6, 1992, at 7:30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, Chuck
Puleo, David Hart, John Moustakis, Kosta Prentakis, Michael
Cunningham, Debbie Hilbert, and Albert Hill . Also present were
City Planner Bill Luster, Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco,
Clerk.
SITE PLAN REVIEW - GAUTHIER MOTORS - 135 CANAL STREET }_
Attorney Ellen Winkler of Serafini, Serafini, and Darling,
addressed the Planning Board on behalf of her clients, Gauthier
Motors , for site plan review, for the construction of a 2,475
s.f. addition to the existing building located at 135 Canal
Street.
She noted that the purpose of the addition is to separate the
companies dealerships as requested by their franchisers . She
also noted that the proposed addition will house 6 service bays
• and will provide excess parking spaces . She stressed that this
addition is a re-emphasis of services that are already provided
at that location, and that nothing new is being introduced.
Albert Hill asked about the disposal practices for oil , tires
and other materials that need to be disposed of. Atty. Winkler
stated that they are stored and removed by contractors.
It was asked that the elevations for the project be 'explained.
The Architect for the project explained that the elevations
are base 7.7. Bill Luster explained that elevations are
important to show drainage on a project, however in a project
such as this which is mostly flat, it is not as important.
Bill Luster also explained that this is the first project that
has been filed since the Entrance Corridor Overlay District
was passed. He stressed that this project is not typical of
a traditional project since it is small . He suggested that
the approval process would be quicker that normal and that the
board could give a decision at the next meeting.
Linda Vaughan asked where the closest neighbors would be located.
Atty. Winkler stated that they are on Meadow Street. Linda
Vaughan also asked about the location of the dumpster. She also
suggested that the location of the dumpster should be moved.
• Atty. Winkler suggested that it could be moved to the last
parking space.
1
s�
l�
• Atty. Chris Drucas representing a neighbor, Mr . Michaud stated
that they are opposed to having the dumpster located in the
last parking space. He also stated that they are concerned
about the screening of the corner of Laurel Street with a tree
that is planned for the corner and asked to have it relocated.
He cited safety concerns for the reason of the request.
Mr. Gauthier addressed the Board and stated that he has always
taken the neighbors into consideration, and would work with
them on their concerns .
David Hart asked if there would be any mechanical equipment
used at night. Mr. Gauthier stated that the equipment would
be used during working hours which are 8-5.
Walter Power asked if there would be any fuel stored on site.
Atty. Winkler stated that there would be none stored on site.
Walter Power asked if there would be any additional curb cuts
made to the property. Atty. Winkler stated that they plan to
use the existing curb cuts . Walter Power also asked if there
would be any additional fencing. Atty. Winkler stated that
there' would be no additional fencing.
Walter Power read comments from other city Boards and
• Departments . The City Engineer concurs with the project, The
Board of Health concurs also.
Walter Power noted that the Planning Department would be
reviewing the project and asked that they look into the location
of the dumpster, noise levels, and the locations of the trees.
VILLAGE AT VINNIN SQUARE - AMENDED PLAN DISCUSSION
James Zieff addressed the Board and requested an amendment to
his approved plans to construct 4 six-plex units instead of
the 12 plexes originally approved. He noted that he had much
success with the 2 six plexes that the Board approved in July.
Mr . Zieff showed the Board plans of the entire development as
requested by the Board. He noted that his original plan called
for 57 units in midrise buildings and this new plan calls for
only 24 units .
Walter Power asked how many parking spaces are allowed per unit.
Mr. Zieff stated that there are 32 spaces per unit. He noted
that the density for automobiles presently is 2 cars per
household, and that they do not allow on street .parking at night.
David Hart asked about the elevations of the garages. Mr. Zieff
• noted that the units that are already built had sundecks on
the roofs, but that the new ones will have peaked roofs .
2
• Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the amendment, seconded
by Kosta Prentakis and approved unanimously.
SABLE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION
Patrick and Frank DeIulis addressed the Planning Board informally
to discuss the status of a subdivision that was approved on
1968. They noted that of the 29 lots approved, 15 of them have
been developed or combined and sold. Patrick DeIulis stated
that he thinks that of the remaining 14 lots only 8 or 9 are
buildable.
Patrick DeIulis also noted that they want to make the lots
conform to existing zoning regulations . He also noted that
he would rather file a Form A rather that a whole new subdivision
plan.
Linda Vaughan stated that she felt that a new plan would have
to be filed noting that other subdivisionshave been ordered
to refile by the Courts, due to the expiration of the
subdivisons.
Walter Power suggested that the Board have a site visit to
familiarize the members with the area. It was decided to have
a site visit on March 7, 1992 at 9 :00 a.m.
• David Hart suggested that the Board get an opinion from the
City Solicitor on the status of the subdivision as well .
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Debbie Hurlburt reported that she researched the process for
naming streets, as requested by the Board and referred to section
26-3 of the Salem Code. . She also reported that 'Mussalini Road
is a paper street, and that Councillor O'Leary is in favor of
renaming that street, as discussed previously by the Board.
Debbie Hurlburt also reported that the parking lot at the strip
mall at Shaws is still in the process of being resolved. She
stated that Fafard will submit plans for' the review of the Board.
Kosta Prentakis reported that a portion of the Ground Round
is not paved. Bill Luster will pull the plans and see if there
is a reason for that.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of January 16, 1992 were presented
for approval . Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the minutes
of the meeting of January 16, 1992, seconded by Kosta Prentakis
• and approved unanimously.
3
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, .a motion was made by David Hart to adjourn
the meeting, seconded by Michael Cunningham and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 9 :30 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB020692
•
•
4
r
C to of Safeni, fflassadjuse#Zs
�, � �ltuuiing �uttrD '';
(One �$ttlem Green ,
NOTICE OF MEETING
You are hereby notified that the Salem Planning Board will hold its
regular meeting on Thursday, January 16, 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. in the 3
second floor conference room at One Salem Green.
r ,
a�-
Walter B. Power, IiII
Chairman
TENTATIVE AGENDA: 7
1 . Form A - 2 Hilton Street
• 4�
2 . Form A - 2 New Liberty Street
3. Form A - 132 Essex Street
4 . Old/New Business `t
5 . Approval of Minutes r�
}
EX\DH\PB11692
r
v
S,.
i
I �4
t' A
e�
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, JANUARY 16, 1992
A regular meeting of the Salem Planning Board was held on
Thursday, January 16, 1992 at 7: 30 P.M. in the second floor
conference room at One Salem Green.
Those present were: Chairman Walter Power, Linda Vaughan, Chuck
Puleo, John Moustakis, Kosta Prentakis , Michael Cunningham,
Debbie Hilbert, Albert Hill, and David Hart. Also present were
Debbie Hurlburt, and Eileen Sacco, Clerk.
FORM A - 2 HILTON STREET
Attorney John Serafini addressed the Board on behalf of his
client Richard Gentile to request approval of a Form A, for
property located on 2 Hilton Street. He explained that the
Form A is required due to conveyance of property, namely that
part of an existing lot ( 1B) is to be split from that lot and
joined to Mr. Gentile' s lot at 2 Hilton Street. Both lots will
be conforming . Atty. Serafini also noted that the lot is
grandfathered and frontage requirements are not applicable.
Atty. Serafini stated that the Gentile ' s plan to put in a
• driveway.
Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the Form A, seconded
by John Moustakis and approved unanimously.
FORM A 2- NEW LIBERTY STREET - (SALEM ARMORY)
Debbie Hilbert recused herself from discussion of this matter.
Atty. John Serafini addressed the Board to request approval
of a Form A for the Armory project. He explained that the Form
A is warranted due to the conveyance of lot A, containing 920
s.f. to the drill shed lot. He noted that the lot is located
on an approved public way, 2 New Liberty Street, and frontage
requirements are in compliance.
Motion made by Linda Vaughan to approve the Form A for 2 New
Liberty Street, seconded by Chuck Puleo and approved unanimously.
FORM A - 132 ESSEX STREET - (ARMORY)
Atty. Serafini addressed the Board and requested approval of
a Form A for 132 Essex Street. He explained that the plan will
divide the two lots, each having sufficient frontage to comply
with the Salem Zoning Ordinance along suitable public ways .
• He noted that one lot is comprised on the Head House containing
9, 082 s.f. which is 132 Essex Street, and the other lot is
1
• comprised of the Drill Shed containing 24,247 s .f. which is
2 New Liberty Street. Atty. Serafini also noted that the lot
is located on an approved public way - 132 Essex Street, and
the frontage requirements are in compliance.
Albert Hill asked why the Form A was necessary. Atty. Serafini
explained that the ownership would be different and that they
are negotiating with the National Park Service to sell space
to them for the visitors center. He also noted that the Museum
Cooperative will own the rest of the parcel.
Walter Power asked what percentage of the building would be
owned by the NPS. Atty. Serafini estimated that they would
own about 50%. Walter also asked what the basement area would
be used for. Atty. Serafini replied that it would probably
be used for storage.
Bill Luster, stated that the project was worked on for a year
and they are finally looking towards the end, noting that they
could have a ground breaking the first or second week of
February.
Motion made by David Hart to approve the Form A for 132 Essex
Street, seconded by Albert Hill and approved unanimously.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
• Bill Luster addressed the Board and stated that he has spoken
to the Mayor concerning a new Master Plan and the changes to
the Zoning Ordinance. He noted that the Mayor wants to move
ahead with both of them. He also noted that he had discussed
them with Stanley Usovich and Jane Stirgwolt, the two new members
of the City Council and they have both expressed an interest
in seeing them move forward.
Walter Power reviewed the process for which the present Master
Plan was designed.
CAROL WAY- NAME APPROVAL
Debbie Hurlburt addressed the Board and stated that City Clerk
Josephine Fusco has informed her that the name of the street
"Carol Way", had never formally been named by the Planning Board.
The members discussed the origination of name Carol Way and
the responsibility of the Planning Board to choose appropriate
names for the streets of the city. Albert Hill expressed his
concern that names of streets should have some connection to
the City and not be arbitrarily names for individuals .
Motion made by Chuck Puleo to approve the name of the Street
• as Carol Way, seconded by David Hart and approved unanimously.
2
Kosta Prentakis addressed the issue of the extension of the
• PUD the Fafard Development. He stated that he reviewed the
PUD and that there are several instances where the PUD was not
complied with. He noted that it states in the PUD that no phase
should contain more than 130 units , and the first phase has
172 units. He also stated that the units were supposed to have
trash compactors in them and not one unit has one. He questioned
the supervision of the PUD. Kosta also requested that he be
included in any meetings with the developer prior to the formal
request for an extension.
Walter Power stated that they would have to research the minutes
of the meeting to see if votes were taken to allow deviations
from the PUD. He also questioned whether Kosta should
participate as a member of the Planning Board since he owns
property in the development. Kosta stated that he has no
preconceived notions about extending the PUD, but stated that
he felt that the City should get something in return. He
suggested that perhaps a playground should be constructed to
accommodate the children in the development.
Walter Power noted that the area was planned for passive
recreational use and it was not planned for use by children.
He noted that if there are more children in the development
than they originally planned for that maybe they could reach
an agreement about the possibility of a playground for them.
• Linda Vaughan recalled that the possibility of 'a playground
was discussed during the approval process for the PUD and that
there were concerns about the upkeep and who would be responsible
for it.
Kosta noted that the residents of the Hamlet are presently doing
a census of the number of residents that will include children
as well as the number of cars in the development, and he will
forward that information to the Planning Board.
David Hart stated that it sounds like the project was an
experiment that may have not worked as intended. Walter Power
noted that at the time the Board visited a similar development
in Ashland, that was successful.
Kosta Prentakis stated that he felt that it would be helpful
to the Planning Board to have input from the residents of the
condo association. Walter Power suggested that they set up
a committee to advise the Planning Board of their concerns,
since there will be no Public Hearing on the matter.
Debbie Hilbert asked if there are conditions of the PUD that
have not been fulfilled if they could be required to correct
that before the PUD is extended. Walter Power noted that since
•. the developer is in Bankruptcy it is difficult to get anything
at this time, although he said he felt that the developer would
3
reorganize.
Kosta Prentakis noted that his concern is that the PUD is not
supervised well . He suggested that Planning Board members
personally check on projects. Walter Power noted that there
is a clerk of the works for that.
David Hart stated that he felt it was difficult to control things
like trash compactors , since they are not required. Walter
Power stated that the issue of trash compactors may have come
up during discussions of trash removal and if it was made a
condition to make trash more manageable then the Planning Board
could address that issue.
Walter Power also noted that the roads that were completed never
got a finish coat of paving. He suggested that in the future
the Board should get a bond to insure that it happens in the
event that something happens to the project.
David Hart suggested that they meet the City Planner to discuss
a process by which they could monitor the PUD and see that the
end result is a good product.
OLD BUSINESS
• Debbie Hurlburt reported that Mr. Zeiff wants to come to the
next meeting to present another overlay plan for four more six
unit buildings .
Kosta Prentakis reported that a bank of street lights from
Somerville Lumber to First Street are not functioning and it
is a safety hazard.
Debbie Hurlburt informed the Board that she has been in touch
with John David from Fafard and that the tenants are opposed
to the DO NOT ENTER signs in the south west end of the parking
lot for the strip mall. He suggested that speed bumps be
installed as an alternative. David Hart stated that he thought
that the speed bumps would be worse. Debbie Hurlburt will look
into the matter and report to the Board.
Debbie Hurlburt reported that Sgt. Howell from the Police
Department told her that the yellow lines on Highland Ave. in
front of Salem Hospital were put there to have the traffic merge
into one lane to avoid accidents. Linda Vaughan disagreed noting
that she felt it is more dangerous there with the lines.
RIGHT OF WAY - LORING TOWERS
Debbie Hurlburt informed the Board that she had spoken to Richard
Stafford about the granting of the right of way from Loring
Towers, and he stated that he has been unable to contact the
Attorneys for Loring Towers to get the matter settled. She
4
• noted that the Attorneys are in Washington. Kosta Prentakis
suggested that we contact Nick Mavroules to see if he can help
get things moving. Debbie noted that Richard Stafford suggested
having Mr. Zeiff contact them since he has been instrumental
in Loring Towers agreeing to the right of way to the city.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of November 21 , 1991 were presented
for approval. Motion made by Kosta Prentakis to approve the
minutes of the meeting of November 21 , 1991 , seconded by David
Hart and approved unanimously.
The minutes of the meeting of December 5, 1991 were presented
for approval. Motion made by Debbie Hilbert to approve the
minutes of the meeting of December 5, 1991 , seconded by Kosta
Prentakis and approved unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Board at this meeting, a motion was made by John Moustakis to
adjourn the meeting, seconded by Linda Vaughan and approved
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
• RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EILEEN M. SACCO, CLERK
PB011692
5
Z661