1978-PLANNING BOARD � i � n�, � �� � �� ,� � � � �5
1978
.._� -
� __ _ _ �
� �. � - -
n m
(OUP j Falpttt (Arm
Minutes of, the Salem Planning Board Meeting Held January 5, 1978,
7:30 P.M. , Third Floor Conference Room, One Salem Green, Salem, Plass.
Members Present: Walter Power, Paul D'Amour, Abby Burns, Donald Hunt,
John Brown, Richard Lutts, William Wheaton
Member Absent: Ted Sadoski
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the meeting in session at
7:35 P.M.
A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by Abby Barns to
approve the minutes of the meeting of December 8, 1977 as copied and
mailed to the members for advance reading. The vote was unanimous and
the chairman declared the motion carried.
• Form A
Arnold & Olga Grot - 17 Raymond Ave.
Planning Board Aide Michael Moniz was present and explained that
two years ago the Grot's obtained a special permit from the Board of
Appeals to deed 45 sq . ft. of th@&r property at 17 Raymond Road to
the abutting owners Mr. & Mrs Gilbert. This Form A is being presented
to officially clean up the plot line. After a brief discussion of the
plans a motion was made by William Wheaton and seconded by Paul D'Amour
to endorse the Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision .
Control Law, The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion
carried.
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 2
Chairman Walter Power informed the Board that he has written a
letter to Mayor Levesque requesting approval for the Planning Board to
transfer $205. from Mimeo and Printing to the clerk's salary for com-
pensation for additional work in connection with the Wetlands/Flood
Hazard Special Permit. It was the consensus of those present that this be
accomplished.
Pickman Park
Walter Power opened the discussion by asking Michael Moniz if the
requirements of the Subdivision Regulations had been adequately addressed
by the ,developers. Michael informed the Board that Lt. Groggin has
responded with his approval of the plan. Michael also stated that Staley
McDermet and Jim McDowell have met with Richard Swenson and the City
engineering department is pleased with the proposed culvert near the B & M
railroad and Fillmore Road. Walter Power informed the Board that he
has spoken to Mr. Sobinski of the Board of Health and that he has stated
that everything seems in order, but before a written statement could be
issued he would have to bring it up at a Board of Stealth meeting. Their
next meeting is scheduled for January 10, 1978. Walter stated that
because of this, any action taken by the Planning Board would have to
be conditional on receiving a written statement from the Board of Health
approving the Plan.
Discussion next followed .relevant to the "Proposed Modification
Pickman Park Subdivision Plan" dated 1/5/78. Staley McDermet pointed out
that there were two parcels of land that were presently marked "Available
•
Minutes of 1/$/78 Page 3
• for Tennis Courts" on the plans. He stated that the developers want
these two parcels to be marked "Restricted Area (available for Recreational
Devellpment - See Note, Sheet 11" instead. This would allow them some
additional freedom for future development. It was the consensus of
those members present that this change be allowed.
The board next considered the note that is proposed to be added to
Sheet 1. This note reads as follows, "The intent of this provision is that
these two parcels of land so noted are available for development by the
property owners for recreational purposes only. Such development may be,
but is not necessarily limited to, construction of courts for games
(tennis, basketball, etz.) picnic shelters, a swimming pool, a small
community building such as a clubhouse, dressing rooms, or toilets, or
• other appropriate recreational construction. (only one building may
be constructed, and it may only be constructed on the Fillmore Road
parcel. only minimal parking will be allowed if necessary, and only
on the Fillmore Road parcel!:
y - Any use of this land for recreational development must be compatible
with;,the coalitions and intent of the Special Permit dated December 23,
1977, and be compatible with the natural use of the land. Any recrea-
tional development must meet with the approval of the Salem Planning
iBoard before construction can begin."
Attorney Beatrice, representing the developer, stated that he
i
wanted the word "small" eliminated from the phrase, "a small community
building..." He pointed out that the Planning Board would still have
control over arty "proposed construction since " any recreational
Page 4 Minutes of 1/5/78
• development must be compatible with the conditions and intent of the
Special Permit. . .and any recreational devleopment must meet with the
approval of the Salem Planning Board before construction can begin."
He explained that using the worn "small" could cause unnecessary con-
fusion relevant to the intent of this note in future years. It was the
consensus of the Planning Board members present that the word "small"
be eliminated from the note.
Attorney Beatrice also requested that the sentence in parenthesis
stating that "(Only one building may be constructed, and it may only be
constructed on the Fillmore Road Parcel." be eliminated from the 'Note' .
Attorney Beatrice pointed out that restricting the future owners to "one"
building may go against the real intent of this sentence since they
may want both lockers and showers constructed for a tennis court and
• even though these would not be large structures, there would be two.
He also stated that this freedom should also extend to the parcel at the
end of Eisenhower Drive, instead of completely eliminating any kind of
construction at the end of Eisenhower Drive.
Staley McDermet explained that there was two ways of dealing with
the makeup of the Subdivision Plan. Either every stage could be specifically
'legislated' or else the basic intent of the development could be ex-
plained and left more open to future interpreAation by the Planning
Board in future years . In addition Staley explained that the parcel at
the end of Eisenhower Drive is in the middle of the development and he
did not think that the construction of a small clubhouse would be
appropriate. Walter Power expressed concern that the 75' buffer zone
had been eliminated between the development and existing housing in
• this section. He pointed out that the abutters had been repeatally
fr:a.
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 5
• assured that there would be a 75' buffer zone at any place where the
development abutts existing housing. Staley explained that the buffer
zone had been eliminating from this section because it contained
most of the level land of the parcel. Attorney Beatrice stated that
this parcel was small and he could not envision anything other than a
small storage shed being proposed at any time.
Staley McDermet suggested that the words "only one" in this sentence
b changed to "a" and that the phrase "and a small building ancillary to
adjacent recreational facilities may be constructed an the Eisenhower
Drive parcel and must be located at least 75' from any property
outside the Pickman Park development" should be added at the end of the
sentence. Jim McDowell commented that that would still limit the future
• association of owners to one building on the Fillmore Road parcel.
Walter Power again stated that he felt that the abutters of the Pickman
Park development had been promised a buffer zone and that this change
could make it possible for a• "tennis court to be constructed 10 feet
from someones home."
Bill Wheaton proposed that the 75' buffer zone be reinstated on
the Plan and the sentence under discussion be eliminated from the sub-
division modification. Attorney Beatrice agreed with this and it was
the consensus of those present that the sentence "(Only one building
may be constructed, and it may only be constructed on the Fillmore Road
parcel." be eliminated and the inclusion of the buffer zone that was
eliminated form Modification #4 of the Pickman Park Subdivision Plan.
Staley explained that modification #3 of the Pickman Park Subdivision
• Plan which reads, "On Parcel 124 change the note "Recreation Use Only"
to "Conservation Restricted Area." was proposed since Parcel 124
i`d
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 6
• is located in the more restricted phase III of the development. There
were no objections from the Board or the developer to this modification.'
A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by Paul D'Amour that
the Planning Board approves the following mmdifications to the Pickman
Park Subdivision Plan:
1. Change note on two parcels marked "Available for Tennis Courts"
to: "RESTRICTED AREA
(AVAILABLE FOR RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT _ SEE NOTE, SHEET 1)"
2. Add this note on Sheet 1:
"The intent of this provision is that these two parcels of land so
noted are available for development by the property owners for recrea-
tional purposes only. Such development may be, but is not necessarily
limited to, construction of courts for games (tennis, basketball, etc.) picnic
shelters, a swimming pool, a community building such as a clubhouse,
dressing rooms., or toilets, or other appropriate recreational construc-
tion. (Only minal parking will be allowed if necessary and only on the
Fillmore.Road parcel.)
Any use of this land for recreational devilopment must be compativle
with the conditions and intent of the Special Permit dated December 23,
1977, and be compativle with the natural use of the land. Any recrea-
tional development must meet with the approval of the Salem Planning
Board before construction can begin."
3. On Parcel 124 change the note "Recreation Use Only" to "Conservation
Restricted Area."
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 7
• 4. The parcel of land designated "Recreational Use Only, (Available for
Tennis Courts)V located at the end of Eisenhower Drive is to be redes-
ignated as follows:
a. The area between lot 95 and the parcel shown as Joseph A & Camile
A. O'Keefe to the existing buffer zone is to be designated "75'
BUFFER ZONE, RESTRICTED AREA."
b. The remainder of the parcel is to be designated "Restricted Area
(Available for Recreational Development - See Note Sheet 1)".
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
In considering the proposed conditions to be added to the certificate
of Action, it was the consensus of those present to adopt the following
two conditions for the Pickman;rPark Subdivision Plan:
• 1. Approval is conditional upon receipt by the Salem Planning Board of
a description of metes and bounds of the areas in Phase III under
Conservation Restrictions.
2. Approval is condition) upon receipt by the Salem Planning Board
of a plan of the 28.3 acre conservation parcel to be deeded to the
City of Salem, including the metes and bounds of the line between
the conservation parcel and the land to be developed.
Walter Power added that a performance guarantee from the developers
was required and outlined in Salem's Subdivision regulations and would also
have to be included as a condition of the Certificate of Action. In
addition, he stated that since the Board of Health has not formally
responded to the Subdivision Plan the approval of the Subdivision Plan would
also have to be conditional on their approval or the "statutory
• limitation" of thbir comment period. Walter also had received a legal opinion
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 8
• from Bill Tinti that the following condition be added to the Certificate
of Action: "The validity of the Subdivision Plan is contingent upon
the Special Permit and conditions of the Special Permit."
Michael Moniz informed the Board that he has reclived two notarized
letters from Ugo DiBiase addressing additional requirements of the Sub-
division Regulations. One letter outlines the encumbrances on the pro-
perty as the following: "at the time of filing, there was an encumbrance
on the land held by a mortgage at the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank and
dated December 2, 1974. I hereby certify that no change or further
encumbrance has been placed on the land from that date."
r
The second letter pertains to the compliance of the Subdivision
with Salems Master Plan and reads: "with reference to Item 5, page 9
of the Suldivision Regulations, it is my opinion that the Pickman Park
Plan is in conformance with the Master Plan. The technological im-
provements in the sanitary sewerage system downstream of Pickman Park
have been made, such that extensive residential land use referenced
in the Master Plan is now possible."
It was the consensus of the Board members present that these letters
adequately address these two requirments of the Subdivision Regulations.
A motion was made by William Wheaton and seconded by Abby Burns that
the Salem Planning Board approves the Subdivision Plan entitled "De-
finitive Subdivision Plan Pickman Park, Salem Massachusetts" by Three
Associates, 13 Central St., Salem, Massachusetts, and Carter and Towers
Engineering Corporation, 6 Fairview Ave, Swampscott, Mass., dated March 17,
1977, revised June 13, 1977, December 14, 1977, December 28, 1977 and
January 5, 1978 subject to the following modifications and conditions:
•
tiodifications:
1 _ Change note on two parcels marked "Available for Tennis Courts" to:
"RESTRICTED AREA
(AVAILABLE FOR RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT - SEE NOTE, SHEET 1 )
• 2. Add this note on Sheet 1 :
"The intent of this provision is that these two parcels of land so
rioted are available for development by the property owners for
recreational purposes only. Such development may be, but is not
necessarily limited to, construction of courts for games (tennis,
basketball , etc.) picnic shelters, a swimming pool , a community
building such as a clubhouse, dressing rooms, or toilets, or other
appropriate recreational construction. (Only minimal parking will
be allowed if necessary, and only on the Fillmore Road parcel . )
Any use of this land for recreational development must be compatible
with the conditions and intent of the Special Permit dated December
23, 1977, and be compatible with the natural use of the land. Any
recreational development must meet with the approval, of the Salem
Planning Board before construction can begin."
3. On Parcel 124 change the note "Recreation Use Only" to "Conservation
Restricted Area."
4. The parcel of land designated "Recreational Use Only, (Available for
Tennis Courts)" located at .the end of Eisenhower Drive is to be n
redesignated as follows:
a. The area between lot 95 and the parcel shown as Joseph A & Camile
A. O' Keefe to the existing buffer zone is to be designated"75'
BUFFER ZONE, RESTRICTED AREA."
b. The remainder of the parcel is to be designated"RESTRICTED
AREA (AVAILABLE FOR RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT - SEE NOTE, SHEET 1)"
Conditions:
1 . The validity of the Subdivision Plan is contingent upon the Special
Permit and conditions of the Special Permit.
2. Approval is conditional upon receipt by the Salem Planning Board 3
of a description of metes and bounds of the areas in Phase III
under Conservation Restrictions.
3 .
3. Approval is conditional upon receipt by the Salem Planning Board of
a plan of the 25.3 acre conservation parcel to be deeded to the City
of Salem, including the metes and bounds of the line between the
conservation parcel and the land to be developed. f
4 . Approval is conditional on the concurrence or statutory limitation
relevant to the Board of Health's comments to the Environmental Impact 1
•, Statement for the Salem Planning Board, by Alan M. Voorhees F
Associates, Inc_ , entitled "Environmental Impact Statement Pickman
Park Salem, Massachusetts" , September 1977.
5. Approval is conditional upon receipt of a oer•fon=ance guarantee as
specified in Section III .B.5. of the "Salem, Massachusetts Subdivision
Regulations" . = _.
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 10
• The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Greg Senko next spoke to the Board. He explained that with the
increased output of the Planning Board that he felt the Board should
allocate money to purchase an IBM Selectric typewritten for the use of
the Planning Board Clerk in the Planning Department office. He exti-
mated the cost at $700-$800 and stated that the money could be taken from
a combination of monies from the office supply and engineering supplies
accounts of the Planning Board. Abby Burns questioned the need for so
expensive of a typewriter. Greg replied that he wanted it compatible
with the typewriters already in the Planning Department. After a brief
discussion, a motion was made by Bill Wheaton and seconded by John Brown
to authorize Greg Senko to utilize Planning Board funds allocated in
the Planning Board budget for office supplies and engineering supplies
• for the purchase of an IBM Selectric typewriter for the use of the
Planning Board to be located in the offices of the Planning Department.
John Brown, Paul D'Amour, Walter Power and William Wheaton boted yea.
Abby Burns and Richard Lutts opposed. Donald Hunt present. The chair-
man declared the motion carried.
Greg next spoke to the Board of the Master Plan. He stated that
in speaking with Cheri Cooper she had stated that a consultant would
not be needed for the waterfront section of the Master Plan until it is
time for the policy statement. He also informed the Board that the
$5,000 he thought was left in the Master Plan Budget for the Waterfront
study isn't. He explained that the monies left are to be used for a
joint parking and circulation study with the Off Street Parking Commiss-
ion for the downtown area. Bill Wheaton pointed out that Greg had
_c_ s
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 11
• agreed to provide $5,000 for consultants for the waterfront study.
Greg stated that he realized that, but that the traffic study is costing
more than anticipated. Donald Hunt questioned why an additional traffic
study was needed when there had already been a study in conjunction
with Heritage East and West, and the connector road. Greg stated
that an update as well as a parking study was now needed.
Cheri Cooper next spoke with the Board relevent to the progress
format and future of the Master Plan. Relevant to format, Cheri suggested
the follwing. One or two master copies of all the data and inventories
collected which would be in the correct format to feed into the computer.
There would also be a booklet for each section of the Master Plan which
would contain a summary of the Master Plan as well as the policy and
• action plans arrived at.s.Thereiwould also be a "glossy" which would
contain a summary of the Master Plan as well as the policy and action
plans for all areas covered in the master plan.
Abby Burns questioned why the "glossy" had to be so expensive
and elaborate. Cheri replied that it could be used to accompany
grant applications and it would be of a size and stle that every resident
in Salem could read it. Donald Hunt suggested that a few hundred of the
"glossy" be printed and that something less expensive be used for
"handouts" to residents.
Relevant to the present traffic study Cheri stated that none of the
other studies had contained a complete study. She further stated that a
study was needed that outlined not only where and why the traffic
problems occur but what can be done to correct it.
•
r
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 12
•
Donald Hunt questioned if she was ming the-study on the existence
of the connector Road. Cheri replied that the study will be approached
fmmm both viewpoints and will include the areas of Central St., Derby St,
and Sumner St. Walter Power questioned why only the downtown area will
be studied. Cheri replied that that was all that could be accomplished
with the money available. She added that Alan Voorhees & Associates
Inc. was the only firm who would do original research for the money
offered.
Cheri also informed the Board that a full time person from DPW
will be assigned to work with her relevant to a study on water, sewerage,
plantings and drainage for the next 20 years. Cheri pointed out that
this would provide the City with a formulae for pricing of these items.
• Relevant to Policy, Cheri stated that the Planning Board will
outline the general direction 6f the Master Plan and then subcommittees
will be formed for each section. The recommendations from these subcommittees
would then be incorported in the Master Plan. She also informed the Board
that z of each Planning Board meeting would have to be devoted to the
master plan until Jan. 1979. At the meetings various concurrent sub-
committee meetings could be held with a Planning Board member chairing
each subcommittee and the rest of the subcommittee comprised of people
from various city boards and agencies as well as interested residents.
Cheri also informed the Board that there will be an action Plan for
5 or 6 years and a long range policy statement for 20 years. Walter
Power suggested that there also be a framework for future updating
included. Walter Power also suggested that there be public hearings
. for additional input. Bill Wheaton questioned Whether this would be
a good idea since what was needed were opinions from people who had
some familarity with the master plan and had spent some time this ;king
Minutes of 1/5/78 Page 13
about it.
Y
Abby Burns questioned if housing around the college will be treated by
the Master Plan. Cheri informed her that there would be a telephone
survey. Don Hunt questioned the use of single family dwellings
as rooming houses . Cheri stated that statistics gathered will illustrate
the trends of various neighborhoods.
Cheri stated that the Board might not be in favor of many of the
policy statements contained in the Master Plan, but that they would
have to be a consensus of the subcommittee.
Cheri informed the Board that the policy statement of the MAPC
master plan is not favorable to Salem. In it they call for no new
• highway and in three of the categories-treating areas of recommended
state and federal funding, Salem was not included. It was
suggested that a letter be written to PLUMP.
The Planning Board Meeting was adjourned at 10:45P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
�t,.G01.91y.
( i#� of
j
.,;` f �lattuittg marl
Wnp Oalrm (j6rrpn
CORRECTED
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD MEETHING HELD JANUARY 19, 1978, 7:30 P.M.
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Walter Power, Paul D'Amour, Ted Sadoski, Abby Burns,
Donald Hunt, John Brown, Richard Lutts
Member Absent: William Wheaton
Chairman Walter Power called the meeting to order with a quorum
present at 7:30 P.M.
A motion was made' by John Brown and Seconded by Abby Burns to approve
the minutes of December 15, 1977 as copied and mailed to members for
• advance reading. Walter Power, Abby Burns, John Brown, Paul D'Amour,
Ted Sadoski and Richard Lutts voted yea. Dondld Hunt present. The
Chairman declared the motion carried.
A motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded by Richard Lutts to
approve the minutes of January 5, 1978 as copied and mailed to members for
1.
advance reading. Walter Power, Abby Burns, John Brown, Paul D'Amour,
Ted Sadoski, and Richard Lutts voted yea. Dondld Hunt present. The
Chairman declared the motion carried.
c
Form A.
Philip Durkin - 51 Dearborn St.
The Form A submitted briefly outlined that Mr. Durkin wishes to
sell a portion of his lot to an abutter, Mr. Curran, for off street
parking. Ted Sadoski questioned the 85' frontage which would result
•
Minutes of 1/19/78 CORRECTED PAGE Page 2
from the exchange of this land. Ted stated that for a Form A to be
• endorsed as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law the
lot has to conform to the frontage requirement of the zoning of the City.
Michael Moniz stated that the land is in a R1 District and has a minimum
frontage requirement of 100 ft. William Wheaton questioned if this would
hold true if a house remained on both lots. Michael Moniz stated that Mr.
Durkin would have to own both houses in order to qualify for a Form A with
below the minimum frontage. John Brown questioned whether the Attorney
for the Durkins could be informed that the Planning Board agrees with
the intent of the Form A, even though they are unable to endorse it.
Ted stated that it would be more advantageous to Mr. Durkin if the Form
A was withdrawn instead of denied. Ted further stated that the intent
of asking Mr. Durkin to withdraw his Form A would be to allow him to
obtain a variance from the Board of Appeal and then he could resubmit
• the Form A to the Board.
Afterysome further discussion, a motion was made by Ted Sadoski,
seconded by Donald Hunt and unanimously voted that Mr. Durkin's attorney
Mr. Toomey, be contacted and asked to withdraw the Form A without
prejudice. The Chairman declared the motion carried.
Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit
It was the consensus of the members present that a public hearing
be scheduled for Henry O'Donnell relevant to the proposed reconstruction
of his seawall on February 16, 1978 at 7:30 P.M.
Master Plan
Cheri first spoke of the ConCom update of thier Conservation, Open
Space and Recreation Plan. She explained that the updating of this
• plan was to be a joint effort with various City Boards and agencies.
Minutes of 1/19/78 Page 2
• from the exchange of this land. Ted stated that for a Form A to be
endorsed as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control law the
lot has to conform to the zoning of the City. Michael Moniz stated that
the land is in a R1 District and has a minimum frontage requirement of
100 feet. William Wheaton questioned if this would hold true if a
house remained on both lots. Michael Moniz stated that Mr. Durkin would
have to own both houses in order to qualify for a Form A with below the
minimum frontage. Ted Sadoski stated that even if Mr. Durkin was
granted a variance from the Board Of Appeal, the Planning Board still
would not be able to endorse the Form A since it does not meet the
frontage requirements. Cheri Cooper suggested that the matter be re-
ferred to the Board of Appeal. John Brown questioned whether the Attorney
for the Durkins could be informed that the Planning Board agrees with the
• intent of the Form A, even though they are unable to endorse it. Ted
stated that it would be more advantageous to Mr. Durkin if the Form A
was withdrawn instead of denied.
After some further discussion, a motion was made by Ted Sadoski,
seconded by Donald Hunt and unanimously voted that Mr. Durkin's attorney,
Mr. Toomey, be contacted and asked to withdraw the Form A without
prejudice. The Chairman declared the motion carried.
Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit
It was the consensus of the members present that a public hearing
be scheduled for Henry O'Donnell relevant to the proposed reconstruction
of his seawall on February 16, 1978 at 700 P.M.
Master Plan
Cheri first spoke of the ConCom update of their Conservation, Open
• Space and Recreation Plan. She explained that the updating of this
plan was to be a joint effort with various City Boards and agencies.
Minutes of 1/19/78 Page 3
• She also stated that the ConCom was holding a meeting on January 31, 1978
to discuss the proposed format and requirement for the update. Walter
Power, Paul D'Amour and Michael Moniz expressed interest in attending
this meeting.
Cheri further explained that the present Conservation, Open Space and
Recreation Plan contains an excellent inventory and that very little of
it has to be updated. She also stated that for the Conservation, Open
Space and Recreation Plan to conform to state statues, a policy statement
and a five year action plan has to be created. Cheri continued by stating
that as of this time the Commission is in favor of a larger map than she
is planning for the Master Plan. She also stated that she did not want
the maps to be of different sizes.
• Cheri then proceeded to review the various study elements for the
Master Plan as well as the suggested make up of the committees. Cheri
suggested that one Planning Board member chair each subcommittee and
that at the meeting of February 2, 1978 the Planning Board could decide
on the City Boards and agencies they would like to have comprise the various
committees.
Relevant to the policy statement for each subcommittee, Cheri
explained that the Planning Department will supply some recommendations
of general policy for each of the committees. The Board can consider
these recommendations and use them to stimulate discussion on other
policy possibilities. Walter Power suggested that at the next Planning
Board meeting that the Board go over possible broad policies and then send
out invitations to various boards and agencies to be included on the sub-
committees.
` Minutes of 1/19/78 Page 4
• John Brown questioned if the various committees had to be comprised
of only people from various city agencies. Cheri, explained that if, for
instance, a representative of Pickering Wharf were asked to be on the
Economics Subcommittee than that would not be fair to the other developers
owning land in Salem. John Brown further stated that a representative
from the Banking Community of Salem could be invaluable on the fiscal
committee . Cheri replied that input from the Banks would be encouraged
at any public hearings that would be held, but that she did not think
they should be on the actual subcommittee. John Brown stated that no
matter how good the completed master plan is, it would be useless if
there wasn't community support for implementation.
•In speaking of the time frame for the various elements of the
Master Plan, Cheri stated that she was having difficulty in coordinating
• all the meetings that will be necessary without having too great a time
commitment required from subcommittee members. In giving a brief outline of
the general format of each committee, Cheri stated that the Planning
Department staff would meet to provide ideas that can then be used to
stimulate discussion for the subcommittees. After the individual sub-
committees have met and discussed the issues, than a public hearing
could be held for further input from other sectors of the community.
Walter Power questioned whether relying only on public hearings for input
from various community organizations would be enough. Cheri pointed out
that the Chamber of Commerce has been recommended for many of the
subcommittees. Ted geestioned the idea of the Chamber as the total
representation of local interest. He further stated that "technical
expertise" would be meeded on these subcommitttes for the results to be
• relevant. Cheri explained that a good working relationship has evolved
Minutes of 1/19/78 Page 5
• with the Chamber and that they had already been quite helpful in distributing
the parking questionnaires. She also informed the Board that the Chamber
has also been responsible for the inclusion of water saving techniques
that will be sent with future water bills. In addition the various
business members of the Chamber are going to be sellingthe water saving
devices to the community at cost. John Brown again stated that support
will be needed to implement the Master Plan and one way to accomplish
this is to include different people on the subcommittees.
Cheri also informed the Board that a series 6f articles on the Master
Plan will be presented in the Salem Evening News. Cheri also stated that
she would send a summary of the data to each Planning Board Member to
explain the tables they have received. Cheri also noted that the colored
pages contained in the binder are planned to be distributed free to
• tourists if printing costs can be provided.
Walter Power questioned when Cheri believed the Master Plan would
be completed. Cheri stated that she expected it to be done in
January 1979. She explained that her contract ended in August, but that
It was renewable.
John Brown questioned who will notify the various city agencies
relevant to serving on the subcommittees. Cheri said she would.
Richard Lutts in referring to the handout "What is a Master Plan"
stated that he did not think there should be too many goals. Cheri
stated that there would probably be 5-10 goals and for each goal an
action strategy. Cheri also stated that she felt that overall policy
should be discussed after she returns from vacation. It was the concensus
of those present that Master Plan goals be discussed on February 16, 1978.
A motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded by Donald Hunt to
adjourn the meeting at 9:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
1
0 .( Ctv of �MlElll, �:�A�IM�SMCI�L[SEtt�
• � m
` " � �lauiiiitg �Oarl
�'��uo.,os"� �riP �M�PIri �IPpri
'I..NUT 2 0" THC Si•1*1.P4 PLANNING BOARD mz;'ETING [:QLD FEBRUARY lo, 1978, 7:30 P .M
HIPD GOR CONrR3i1 200[•? ONE SALEii GR:
Minutes of 2/16/78 Page 2
• relevant to this Special Permit application. The Building Inspector,
City Engineer and Board of Health have concurred with the application
as presented. The Conservation Commission concurred with the intent of
the project but noted condition #12 on their Notice of Intent as a
modification of part of the plan.
Since there were no further comments from anyone present, the Chairman
declared the hearing closed at 7:55 P.M.
The Chairman opened the regular meeting of the Planning Board at
7.58 P.M. with a querum present.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and
seconded by John Brown that the Planning Board approve the Wetland
Flood Hazard Special Permit application for the repair of the sea wall
at 17 Hemenway St. with the following condition: " The work shall be
• done in accordance with the site plan prepared by Vortan T. Mooradian and
submitted to the Planning Board with the exception that proposed riprap
be replaced by riprap extending no more than 3 feet from the fall fif the
wall. The rock used for riprap shall be of a size and shape suitable to
sea conditions in the area." The vote was unanimous and the chairman
declared the motion carried.
A motion was made by Ted Sadoski and seconded by Paul D'Amour that
the minutes of the Executive Meeting of the Planning Board of February
2, 1978 be approved as written and that the clerk collect and destroy
the copies of these minutes and place the original on file in a locked
file. The vote was uaanimous and the Chairman declared the motion
carried.
•
Minutes of 2/16/78 Page 3
• The Board next briefly discussed the decision handed down by the
Supreme Judicial Court relevant to Loring Hills. It was suggested that
guidelines to be used by the Planning Board be obtained from the City
Solicitor relevant to this decision. Bill Wheaton pointed out that the
decision rendered does not expand the powers of the Planning Board, but
it does grant the Board much greater powers relevant to information
acquision. Ted Sadoski pointed out that March 2nd had been established
as the final date for the Agreement in Principal between the developers
of Loring Hills and the Planning Board to be signed. It was the consensus
of the Board Members present that Bill Tinti be asked to attend the next
Planning Board Meeting.
Form A
The Board next discussed the Form A submitted by Petro and Anastasia
• Theopilopoulas of Valley Street. Michael Moniz explained that the lots
in question had been subdivided in 1973 to form lots 562E and 562F.
The house standing on Lot 562E does not meet the sideline requirements
but a variance for this has been obtained from the Board of Appeal.
What is being considered for this Form A is the transfer of
the "overhang" parcel of land between 562E and 562F.
Walter Power noted that the current frontage requirements are not
met by these lots and in reading the two exceptions to frontage requirements
outlined in the Subdivision Regulations, Walter noted that these lots
do not fulfill either one. Ted Sadoski noted that this Form A was re-
questing a change in the lot lines and would not effect the frontage of
the existing lots.
•
Minutes of 2/16/78 Page 4
• Michael Moniz noted that the total of the square footage of lots E & F
do not equal the sq . footage stated at the time of the 1973 Form A. He
noted that 1400 sq . ft. have been "lost" . He also stated that he thought
this was an error of the person who drew the plans for the current Form A.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Donald Hunt to
endorse the Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control
Laws . The vote was unanimous and the chairman declared the motion carried.
Michael Moniz next informed the Board that the selection of the firm
to do the Collins Cove study has been narrowed to two firms. The two
firma are Delta Group and Carol Johnson Associates. These two plans
will be presented to the public on Feb. 22, 1978 at 7:00 & 8:30 P.M.
respectively. Paul D'Amour is to attend this public meeting.
Master Plan
• Cheri Cooper of the Planning Department asked if anyone on the Board
had noted any corrections to the directory (colored pages) that had been
distributed to them. Don Hunt noted that his name had not been listed
under Insurance. Cheri asked that the Board members review these pages
for any additional corrections.
Walter Power started the discussion relevant to the mechanics of the
Proposed subcommittees and the feasibility of having all the subcommittees
running concurrently. Cheri stated that she could write the entire master
plan herself, but she was of the opion that the Board wanted the end
product to reflect the specific needs of Salem and be a polically real
document.
Ted Sadoski stated that he did not feel that he could attend the
number of meetings that would be necessary if all the subcommittees were
• run concurrently, and he agreed with Walter that the mechanics of gath&atng
Minutes of 2/16/78 Page 5
• the reactions of other boards and city agencies would be difficult. He
also pointed out that many of the boards and city agencies recommended
for the various subcommittees are to be on a number of the subcommittees,
and that this would be demanding an inordinate amount of their time too.
Bill Wheaton stated that he thought it was terribly premature to be
thinking of meeting with other city boards and agencies. He suggested
that the board members discuss each of the seven elements and arrive at
the goals and directions for each of the elements. He futher stated
that after this was accomplished then the board could meet with members
of other boards for one or two general discussions. The aim of these
discussions with other Boards would not be to arrive at definitive judgements,
but to arrive at more broad outlines. Once this is accomplished, then
the Planning Department could construct two or three 'scenarios' based
• on the directions suggested. After this was accomplished then these
2 or 3 possibilities could be presented to the public. In giving an
example of how this could be accomplished, Bill stated that relevant
to "Economic Development", other than the utilities, he believed that
Salem State was Salem's largest industry. He further stated that it was
not up to the Planning Board to evaluate this, that was up to the Planning
Department. Other boards could be surveyed for ideas and that the plan
would be molded around these ideas.
Walter Power suggested that if the elements were considered in-
dividuUly that there could be more input from all the members of the
Board. He also stated that many members of the Board are interested in
several of the elements of the Master Plan and that the original plan
of concurrent meetings with one Board member chairing each subcommittee
•
Minutes of 2/16/78 Page 6
• could eliminate valuable participation.
Ted Sadoski pointed out that if three meetings were held for each
element this would result in 21 meetings. Bill Wheaton noted that it
might be possible to invide one board that is included on many subcommittees
to one meeting to discuss all the elements they are involved in.
Cheri Cooper stated that she did favor dealing with each element
individually. John Brown added that if the Board established the 'right
questions' for the various Boards then specific lines of discussion could
be established. William Wheaton then suggested that possibly each subcommittee
could meet twice, once for the Planning Board to explain the goals they
have established and a second meeting to gain the other Board's input.
Ted Sadoski then noted that he thought there was still some question
as to the specific make up of the subcommittees. Walter Power added that
• the scope of each element established by the Planning Board might be of
help in the establishment of members of the individual subcommittees.
Bill Wheaton next suggested the possiblity that two contributing
boards could be met with at the same time. Then there could be 7 meetings
for the seven elements following these informal meetings. After this is
accomplished then it could be presented to the general public as a total
package.
Bill Wheaton also suggested that each member of the Board submit an
approximately two page description and set of issues for each of the elements.
These papers could then be discussed in a more specific fashion by the
Board.
•
Minutes of 2/16/78 Page 7
• Cheri Cooper pointed out that the data collection for some of the
elements are not completed as of yet and that the Historic and Transpor-
tation sections are blank. John Brown questioned whether the data was
really necessary for preliminary discussions and input by the Planning
Board. Cheri pointed out that she wanted to supply the Board with an
analysis of the data collected and what possible conclusions could be
obtained from it.
John Brown suggested that an outline of issues and goals for one
of the elements be prepared by each member for discussion at the next
meeting. It was the consensus of those present that "Man and Environ-
ment" be considered first.
Walter Power questioned if the Board would like to decide on the make
up of the different subcommittees at this time. John Brown stated that
• he thought this was premature and that the questions and issues raised
by the Board relevant to the individual elements might change the make
up of the subcommittees. William Wheaton agreed that various "active
citizens" may be asked to be on the subcommittees in the futuee. Cheri
Cooper also noted that the Community Development Subcommittee of the
City Council should be kept up to date relevant to the Boards Activities.
She added that there were various subcommittees of the City Council
that it would be wise to include in later discussions. Cheri again stated
that this would help in the Board's efforts to have the City Council
officially accept the finished Master Plan.
Board of Appeal
The agenda for the February 28, 1978 meeting of the Board of Appeal
• was discussed. It was the consensus of the members that letters shoud be
Minutes of 2A6/78 Page 8
• written to the Chairman recommending that the petitions of Robert Ginsburg
and Michael Egan be denied. Mr. Wheaton advised that he would write the
letter concerning Robert Ginsburg's petition. Mr. Hunt advised that he
would write the letter relevant to the petition of Michael Egan.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Don Hunt to adjourn
the meeting at 10:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
•
Ctv of �.5��rletll, cRiMssadjuse##s
;,, ,,, i F ��ttttttitta �uarl
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD MARCH 2, 1978, 7:30 P.M.
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: William Wheaton, Richard Lutts, John Bron, Paul D'Amour
Donald Hunt, Ted Sadoski, Walter Power
Member Absent: Abby Burns
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the-meeting in session
at 7:35 P.M.
A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by John Brown to
accept the minutes of February 2, 1978 as written. The vote was unanimous
and'the Chairman declared the motion Carried.
• City Solicitor, William Tinti, was present to discuss the four
instruments that have been signed by the trustees of Loring Hills
Developers Trust and now require the approval and signatures of the
Planning Board members .
Bill explained that the first instrument is the "Conditions of
Approval" and consists of conditional approval of the plans. Bill
briefly reviewed the history of this development with the Board. He
stated that a preliminary Subdivision Plan had been submitted to the
Board in July of 1974 and a Definitive Plan in September of 1974, This
Definitive Plan was disapproved by the Planning Board, which led to
several court*se riding with the reeent decision by the Supreme
Judicial Court.
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 2
• Bill further explained that this instrument deals with the Definitive
Subdivision Plan consisting of three drawings entitled May 4, 1977, May
13, 1977, June 23, 1977 "Loring Hills Subdivision-Salem, Mass .", "Site
Plan-Parcel G-Healthe Center", "Housing for the Physically Impaired -
Parcel B-Salem Mass ." There are four conditions contained in this
instrument. The first condition describes the structure that is pro-
posed for Parcel B and references the plans that are relevant to it.
The second condition of this instrument states that Parcel G is to be
used for the construction of a nursing home and references the plans
and drawings that are relevant to it. The City Solicitor reminded the
Board that the Modified Definitive Subdivision Plan now being considered
deals only with Parcels B & G. Condition #3 states that "If Parcels
B and G are not developed as described above, the developer shall submit
• revised plans to the Planning Board of the City of Salem covering
parcels B and G for review and approval based on zoning existing at the
time of such resubmission." Condition #4 deals with the handling of
Parcel H. Bill Tinti explained to the Board that the appraisals that
have been done for Parcel H widely differ. For this reason Condition
#4 states that once a final value is determined for the land than the
City will be responsible for the payment of i its appraised value. David
Lash questioned whether, at the time of the taking, the City would have
to pay the total appraised value for future credit or would the City
pay half the price established at the time of the taking. Attorney
Serafini, representing the developers, stated that payment would be
'pro tantum' . The City would pay the total price established at the
time of the taking, i of which would serve as a credit until the court
•
Minttes of 3/3/78 Page 3
• decided on the price of the land. David further questioned if paying
the full price at the time of the taking wouldn't prejudice the Court
against the Sity's appraisal. Attorney Serafini stated that this would
not happen because the Court would not be privy to the agreement between
Loring Hills Developers Trust and the City of Salem that calls for the
payment of the land to be z its established value.
City Solicitor, Bill Tinti, informed the Board that both the Plans
and Conditions of Approval have been signed by the developers.
Mr Tinti went on to explain that the second instrument is entitled,
"Stipulation and Release of Charles Quigley & Herman Brettman, Trustees"
This document ensures that the developers "release and disclaim" any
rights to file further modified plans based upon the Definitive Plan
referenced in these instuuments. This instrument also states that the
• acres of land not included in the Modified Plan must be filed under
the zoning that exists at the time these areas are to be subdivided
and developed.
Mr. Tinti explained that the third instrument is a release and
covenant for the developers not to sue for any actions that were taken
by the City prior to the date of this instrument.
The fourth instrument is entitled "Agreement Relating to Taxes" and
states that the developers will not seek to use the provisions of Mass.
General Laws Chapter 121 A relating to real estate taxes, nor shall
they seek any other preferential agreement or status relating to the
real estate taxes to be assessed by the City of Salem on the property
shown on the above—referenced plan. This document further states that the
• developers "Agree and understand that said tax assessments shall be in
accordance with normal standards and procedures used in assessing real
estate in Salem."
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 4
. Ted Sadoski questioned whether the Modified Definitive Subdivision
Plan has been approved by the Board of Health. Michael Moniz stated
that the Board has received formal written approval from the Board of
Health. Bill Tinti added that the revisions of the plans that resulted
from the Certificate of Action enacted in June have been added to the
Plans . Ted next questioned whether the plans have been reviewed by
the City Engineer. Michael replied that the City Engineer has reviewed
the plans, but there has been nothing received from the City Engineer
in writing. Paul 8'Amour stated that written notification from the City
Engineer would be necessary before the Board could sign these four
instruments. MO'Keefe one of the atta orneysof Loring Hills
Developers Trust, suggested that the Board could sign the instruments and
keep them in their possession until written approval is received from
• the City Engineer.
Ted Sadoski further stated that in reviewing the plans he noted
that there were no utilities shown on the plans beyond the cul de sac
by the proposed site of the nursing home . Bill Tinti reiterated that
the connecting utilities for the nursing home were not shown. Attorney
Serafini pointed out that these utilities would have to be shown before
a building permit could be obtained. Walter Power suggested that
possibly the instruments could be signed on the condition that a
letter be received from the City Engineer. Ted Sadoski further stated
that a letter would have to be received from the City Engineer that
he is satidified with the plan even though there are no utilities shown
beyond the cus de sac on the Loring Ave. Extension and in addition, no
electrical utilities, gas lines, light poles or fire hydrants shown
• anywhere on the plans . Bill Tinti stated that in addition to the questions
Minutes of 3/3/7$ Page 5
• relevant to the plan, there also should be further discussion relevant
to the 'protantum' payment for Parcel H.
Attorney Serafini stated that it would be better if the developers
had some written assurance from the Board to present to the Court which
allowed the trustees to sign these instruments. After a brief discussion,
a motion was made by Bill Wheaton and seconded by Ted Sadoski that the
Planning Board issue a Letterof Intent to the trustees of Loring Hills
Developers Trust that the Salem Planning Board fully intends to approve
and sign the following four instruments:
1. Stipulation and Release of Charles Quigley and Herman Brettman, Trus-
tees of Loring Hills Developers Trust.
2. Conditions of Approval Loring Hills Subdivision
3. Release and Covenant not to Sue
• 4. Agreement Relating to Taxes,
as soon as final engineering details have been added to the Modified
Subdivision Plan and a letter has been received from the City Engineer
approving of the Modified Subdivision Plan. The vote was unanimous and
the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Bill Tinti informed the Board that the Mayor is in receipt of a
letter that will establish a tenant screening committee for Marion
Manor.
Attorney Tinti also suggested that the Board inform the MAPC of
the recent court decision relevant to Loring Hills Developers Trust.
He also suggested that this letter state that the Board or their appointed
representative would be willing to participate in a discussion of the
implications of this court decision. He further stated that he felt that
• the Board should try to publicise the court's decision.
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 6
Relevant to Pickman Park, Mr. Tinti informed the Board that
the suit goes to eourt next Wednesday. He will keep the Board informed
relevant to any court action that is taken.
Planning Board Aide, Michael Moniz briefly spoke to the Board
concerning the emergency legislation that has been enacted relevant to
the Wetlands Protection Act. He informed the Board that as long as
the storm damage does not exceed $0%, the Conservation Commission is
empowered to grant an emergency permit for repair workcafter anonsite j
-��� e
inspection. Because of this, the ConCom does not need to hold a public
hearing for much of the necessary repair work.
A discussion was next held on how the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special
Permit process could be shortened. Among the possibilities discussed
were the holding of numerous public hearings at the same time. It was
• also noted that the commenting boards could be urged to respond as
quickly as possible so that the time between the submission of plans
and the public hearing could be significantly shortened. Michael also
informed the Board that a press release will be issued next week to
encourage residents who suffered storm damage to submit their Special
Permit applications as soon as possible and to briefly explain the
Special Permit process and the Wetlands Protection act.
Michael next informed the Board that he has been notified by New
England Power/,`that they have rec@ived a grant from the Department of
u
Energy to mix #6 oil with coal. The location of the site of this
structure will be in a Flood Hazard Zone. The elevation of the
site is 14. After a brief discussion it was the consensus of the Board
• members present that New England Power will have to apply for a Flood
Hazard Special Permit. Walter Power noted that the Board will try
to expedite the Special Permit process as much as possible.
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 7
David Lash of the Planning Department next spoke to the Board of
the public hearing that was held relevant to Collins Cove. He explained
that there were two presentations and that Walter Power, Paul D'Amour,
Steve Arkin and Councillor Stanley Uschowitz were in attendence. The
two firms making the presentations were The Delta Group which is based
In Philadelphia and Carol Johnson Associates which is Boston based.
David explained that he anal$%zed2Ahe two presentations using the
following 5 L riteria: Site Analysis
Neighborhood Input
Design
Ability to deal and meet with State and other
Public Officials
Future Grant possiblities
Relevant to site analysis, Carol Johnson Associates. presented 6
or 8 previous projects they have been responsible for including the
redevelopment in back of the Fens in Boston. David explained that Delta
Group's previous experience is centered in commercial, urban and down-
town revitalization.
Relevant to neighborhood input, the Carol Johnson representative has
emphasized heavy neighborhood input in their past projects. At the hearing
she showed samples of mailers they have used in the past and stated
that similar inventories would be used in Salem. John Collins, repre-
sentative of the Delta Group, explained that because his organization
is based in Penna, he would call for the creation of a steering commit-
tee comprised of Community officials and neighborhood representatives.
• A representative from the Delta Group would meet with the Committee
once a month, but that the bulk of the work would have to be done in
Phila. with the steering committee largely responsible for what local
errands had to be accomplished during the month.
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 8
• He also explained that Delta Group would look to the Planning Department
to set up this steering committee.
Relevant to design, the representative from Carol Johnson Associates
sees the area as a neighborhood open space park and their Association
has done this type of design in previous projects. John Collis,
representing the Delta Group, stated that the plan for the area would
be an open space and recreation plan that would be geared to a downtown
area.
When it comes to meeting with various officials, David stated that
because of the location of Carol Johnson Associates, it would be convient
for them to meet with representatives of SESP, New England Power, and
the B & M Railroad. On the other hand, the Delta Group would have to
rely on the monthly meetings of the proposed steering committee and
• the Salem Planning Department for dealing with these organizations.
Relevant to preparation for future funding, the representative of
Carol Johnson Associates stated that they will help prepare a grant
proposal and although they will not be responsible for the entire
permit procedures that will be necessary for implementation, they will
meet with the granting agencies. The representative of the Delta
Group stated stat his organization was prepared to have 2 or 3 meetings
1
with State and Federal Agencies and to prepare some illustrative matOrial�
for these meetings.
Paul D'Amour stated that using the Delta Group could provide a link
with development in other areas of the City.
David Lash stated that during the discussion that followed the two
• presentations it was the consensus of those present that both firms were
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page9
• good. It had been stated at that time that in viewing examples of the
work by Carol Johnson Associates that they would be able to pursee
input into the plan With;mere'detail and that their past work indicates
that they will work to have the park relate to the area it is located in.
David further stated that he questioned how the Delta Group would handle
neighborhood input and coordinate this input.
David then stated that it was the informal consensus of the Planning
Department that Carol Johnson Associates be choosen for the study for
the following reasons: 1. They are based in Boston so they would be
able to do much of their own 'legwork' .
2. In previous projects they have shorn a high degree of sensitivity
to neighborhood concerns and wants.
Walter Power stated that he like Delta Group's idea of 000rdinating
the project with other development going on in Salem. David stated
that he has spoken to the representative of Carol Johnson Associates
relevant to this and that she stated that she was shown the site for
the project and is, at this time, unfamiliar with the development in
other areas of Salem. She did state that any normal design would logi-
cally have to be connected to other development in the area.
When questioned about the cost of the two studies, David replied
that the cost submitted by the two firms is $11,000 for Carol Johnson
Associates and $12,800 for Delta Group.
Bill Wheaton stated that he thought there was a great advantage
in Carol Johnson Associates being a local firm. Walter Power agreed
that their being a Boston based firm would encourage them to be and
remain more involved in the project. David also pointed out that the
• mailing of proposed plans that would be necessary during the project
would entail a week in dealing with the Philadelphia firm, while same
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 10
• day delivery could be accomplished with Carol Johnson Associates.
Walter Power also stated that utilizing Carol Johnson Associates could
lend a new perspective to development in the City. It was the consensus
of the Board members present that the firm of Carol Johnson Assoicates
be selected for the Collins Cove Project.
David Lash stated that this recommendation as well as the Planning
Departments will be forwarded to the Mayor. After this is accomplished,
the contract with Carol Johnson Associates will be negotiated. It
will also be stressed to the firm that the park be coordinated with the
rest of the area. David also stated that he also will work to sub-
contract through Carol Johnson Associates for the base map and topo
map that will be necessary for the project. He explained that it would
entail too many difficulties for the Planning Department to be respon-
sible for the creation of these maps.
In anser to a question proposed by Ted Sadoski, David stated
that added money for the Master Plan has been included in the Small
Cities grant proposal.
Walter ower, in opening discussion on the Master Plan, stated
that Board members were to prepare presentations of areas of interests
for the Environment subcommittees, as well as possible goals and action
plan�Pfor this element of the Master Plan. John Brown pointed out
that this evening was to serve as a 'dry run' for establishing pro-
cedures of dealing with elements of the Master Plan. Walter Powei>
suggested that each Board Member present their ideas to the Board as
a whole.
•
Minutes of 3/3/78 Paget 11
• Donald Hunt stated that he always has had two goals for Salem
relevant to Conservation and Open Space. One of them, is the Forest
River Conservation area which is now coming to fruition and the other
is for the creation of a greenbelt which would include land in Salem,
Lyn, Peabody and Swampscott. He would like to see work being done with
these adjoining communities relevant to this goal.
Richard Lutts stated that he felt controls should be initiated
that would keep development to areas that had already been developed at
one time and that the areas of virgin open space that hill exist
should be protected.
Paul D'Amour next spoke of what he thought should be accomplished in
the Mnvoronment section of the Master Plan. Relevant to mapping, Paul
• thought that overlays for Natural Resources showing surface water,
wetlands, floodplain, soils, vegetation and recreation areas should be
created. Relevant to fish, game and marine lige, Paul thought an analysis
of the existing adverse effects there have been on Salem's marine life
and possible steps to correct this situation be initiated. He also
suggested that the waterfront study include information relative to the
best locations for fishing piers. Relevant to Recreation, Paul proposed
that Winter Island be used as a full recreation area limited to Salem
Residents. He also suggested the creation of coastal foot paths where
possible . In addition, he suggested that present city owned recreational
areas be zoned conservation so that there would be no� nce ofl these
areas being turned into subdivisions . Relevant to Conservation, Paul
also suggested a green belt that would go from Marblehead's conservation
• area to Peabody's conservation area. He also stated that businesses
located along the North River be forced to comply with the clean water
act.
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 12
• Walter Power stated that his suggestions had been geared to topics
and issues for the subcommittees to consider. For example, reative to
the Natural Resources, Open Space and Recreation Subcommittee he sug-
gested issues such asY Should commercial and sportfishing be encouraged
and space provided in a waterfront development plan° Delineate wetlands
and flood plain areas for City to acquire for preservation. Should
natural or abundant fresh ground water areas be mapped and purchased
so as to provide the City with an emergency source of water?
Relative to Recreation, he suggested the subcommittee discuss the
amount as will as recommend specific types of recreational areas to
incorporate in the waterfront development plan. In addition possible
uses for Minter Island should be discussed.
• Relevant to Open Space, Walter suggested the subcommittee consider
the impact on Salem Harbor of expansion of the sewerage treatment pland
into the Harbor—as well as the possible uses for Salem Harbor. He also
felt the subcommittee should discuss the possibility of establishing
an inventory of land for future conservation areas.
Relevant to Conservation, Walter stated that he thought the sub-
committee should work to evaluate the City's use of energy and in doing
this consider some of the energy alternatives such as solar heating as
well as the possibility of establishing tax incentives for energy
conservation.
Relative to Land Use, he thought the subcommittee should discuss
policies of land use in relation to Wetland and flood zone land. He also
thought they should involve themselves in Salem's present land use and
• the advisability of some of these uses changing in the future. For
example, how should present housing patterns be altered as to density
and location. He also felt the subcommittee should consider the need
Minutes of 3/3/7$ Page 13
• for waterfront recreational areas as well as the protection of
environmentally sensitive land areas.
Relative to Man and Environment, Walter also thought that possible
solutions to the condition of the North River shoud be explored as well
as dddressing the traffic and student housing pressure generated by
Salem State College.
Ted Sadoski listed the following space needs to be possibly utilized
by the Subcommittees in their discussions: Conservation
Recreational Services
Open Space
Natural Resources
He also proposed that the subcommittees consider what zoning changes
would be necessary to protect the North River, South River and the Forest
• River. He also thought that existing commercial sections such as the
Willows should be evaluated relative to the possiblity of changing
present usage. Ted also stated that possible solutions for the
North River should be explored. In addition, Ted Balled for the im-
provement of City owned beaches and recreational areas. Ted also stated
that various protections for Open Space should be more fully explored. Ted
also thought that discussion on possible uses for Winter Island should
be held.
William Wheaton stated that possible controls relative to existing
land should be explored. He suggested that every parcel of open land be
tagged as to its environmental potential. For example, land could be
categorized for its potential as active recreation or natural or scenic)
features . Bill stated that this categorizing be utilized to control and
•
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 14
• in some cases prevent development. In agreeing with other Board
members, Bill also thought that there was a need for a map which would
reflect Conservation, Open Space and Recreation land in the City and
the value of each.
John Brown stated that he felt it was more necessary to establish
goals for the elements of the Master Plan and that implementation
of these goals is not the responsiblity of the Planning Board. For
example, he stated that he favored the creation of a green belt, but
that the process of actually implementing it is not in the Board's
jurisdiction.
Some of the goals listed by John for the various subcommittees's
consideration include better utiliztion and awareness of existing
facilities such as museums, parks and golf courses. Along this same line
• he suggested that current resources be made easier to use and know about.
Relevant to open space he suggested that plans in reasonable agreement
itth current conservation goals as well as consistent with economic
productivity be encouraged. He also stated that the stratggy of
'no build' relevant to current open space be explored. In speaking of
various action alternatives, he thought tools such as conservation
restrictions as well as zoning regulations and enforcement , and land
acquisition be explored. In agreeing with suggestions of other Board
members, John suggested further study of some current land uses such as
the Willows Amusement Park.
Bill Wheaton further stated that the question of a priority given
to open space should be fully discussed in order to ascertain how much
• open space is needed and if more is needed, that the parcels should be
listed on a priority basis .
Minutes of 3/3/78 Page 15
Richard Lutts stated that the Board had been forced to accept
some development only because they lacked the tools to prevent it.
He stated that the only control the City has lies in its rales and
regulations and that proper zoning controls were essential to the
implementation of any Master Plan.
Bill Wheaton stated that if the Master Plan can not provide
explicit instructions, it will provide guidelines, not only for the
Planning Board but for other City Boards and agencies as well. Walter
Power added that since the Planning Board was including input from other
City Boards and Agencies there was more of a possiblity that the goals
presented would be implemented. John Brown stressed that it was nec-
essary for a workable Master Plan that support comes from a broad
. base.
Cheri Cooper suggested that the Board members review the Planning
Department staff report that was done on the Environment element and
prepare a written reaction to their suggestions.
Ted Sadoski questioned whether the subcommittees for the Environament
element could be established and that a meeting be established for
April 6. Cheri replied that this could be done .
A motion was made by Dick Lutts and seconded by Paul D'Amour to adjourn
the meeting at 10:40 P.M. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared
the motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
_ x
• 1_ �y-�A� ��d1111I1T 1� . ...
AGENDA
MARCH 23, 1978
1 . Approval of the minutes of February 16, 1978 as copied and presented
to the Planning Board members.
Motion Second
2. Approval of the Minutes of March, 2, 1978 as copied and presented to the
Planning Board Members.
Motion Second
3, Loring Hills- Bill Tinti
4: Community Development - David Lash
5. Flood Hazard/Wetland Special Permits - Michael Moniz
6. Master Plan - Cheri Cooper
7. .Board of Appeals Agenda
o ~ M1Elll� �M�SMC LISE S
Planning marl
&P .0ttlpm Grren
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD MARCH 23, 1978, 7:30 P.M.
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: William Wheaton, Richard Lutts, John Brown, Paul D'Amoour,
Ted Sadoski, Walter Power
Members Absent: Abby Burns, Donald Hunt
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the meeting ;'_in session
at 7:30 P.M.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Richard Lutts to
accept the minutes of February 16, 1978 as written. The vote was unani-
mous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by William Wheaton
to accept the minutes of March 2, 1978 as corrected. The vote was
unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Loring Hills
j City Solicitor, William Tinti, was present to discuss the com-
pletion of the agreements with Loring Hills Developers Trust. Bill
stated that the City would make a pro tantum payment for Parcel H at
the time of the taking. When a final value for Parcel H is established
by the court than the City will be responsible for z the assessed
value.
David Lash informed the Board that all owners of property in the
proposed Forest River acquisition area will be formally informed of
the impending land taking and their rights relevant to it next week.
. After that, the order of taking will be initiated. David further
explained that the land taking will be presented to the City Council
Minutes of 3/23/78 Page 2
• at their first meeting in April and that a tour of the area for members
of the City Council will be arranged shortly after this.
Michael Moniz informed the Board that a letter has been received
from City Engineer, Tony Fletcher, stating that he finds the Subdivision
Plan submitted by Loring Hills Developers Trust in conformance with
the Subdivision Control Laws . Tony also stated in this letter that
the inclusion of all utilities would be "inappribpriate at this time"
and would be included Before final permits for building were obtained.
Ted Sadoski stated that items such as light poles, fire arlarm
boxes, and fire hydrants were specified in the Subdivision Control
Regulations . He also pointed out that the Subdivision Control Regulations
call for approval by the City Electrician. Bill Tinti agreed that the
plans should conform' o the Subdivision Control Regulations . Ted
• Sadoski also stated that he felt the City Engineer was only addressing
the plans from an engineering stand point and not from all the re-
quirements of the Subdivision Control Regulations . He suggested that
the plans could be approved with the provision that the various utilities
not included in the plan at the present time be included. Bill Tinti
suggested that the Board could vote to execute the instruments and delay
signing the plans until the various utilities are included.—Ted Sadoski
stated that he didn't want to delay the approval and asked for the opinion's
of the other Board members . After a brief discussion a motion was made
by William Wheaton and seconded by Richard Lutts that the Planning Board
authorizes the signing of the two instruments entitled "Conditions of
Approval" and "Agreement Relating to Taxes" and that thQ1 'ap pro'val of the
• Subdivision Plans consisting of three drawings entitled May 4, 1977, May 13
1977, June 23, 1977 "Loring Hills Subdivision-Salem, Mass ." , "Site Plan-
Parcel G-Health Center", "Housing for the Physically Impaired - Parcel B-
Salem, Mass ." be subject to conformance with the Subdivision Control Laws
Minutes of 2/23/78 Page 3
• which calls for the inclusion of details such as fire hydrants, light poles
fire arlarms as well as all utilities located in the right of way. The
vote was unanimous and the Chairman delcared the motion carried.
Pickman Park
Bill Tinti stated that he had introduced two motions when the Pickman
Park suit was introduced in court. The first was a motion for dismissal
which was not granted by the court and the second was a motion for a
speedy trial which was granted by the court. Bill stated that the case
would be heard in April.
Loring Hills
A discussion was next held as to the performance guarantee for Lc g
Hills . Ted Sadoski questioned if the type of performance guarantee used for
the Loring Hills subdivision was decided by the Developers or the Board.
Bill Tinti replied it was up to the Board. Bill Tinti suggested that the
statement that "no lots can be sold out until the lots are approved" be
placed on the Subdivision plan before it is signed by the Board members.
Bill Tinti is to do this before the plan is signed. Bill is also to check
to insure that the performance guarantee for Pickman Park is contained in the
covenants established for Pickman Park.
Community Devleovment Funds
David Lash next spoke to the Board of the resolution of the City Council
concerning the filing of applications for and the expenditure of Fiscal
Year 1979 Community Development Entitlement Funds and Fiscal Years 1979,
1980, 1981 Small Cities Funds .
David stated that the City Council also approved the transfer of
$100,000 from the Fy78 Entitlement Residential Rehabilitation Strategies
Minutes of 2/23/78 Page 4
•
for the operation of the Community Center if the UDAG grant is awarded to
the City. David explained, however, that the focus of the Community
Center had changed since it was first presented to the Board. David
stated that the intense housing rehabilitation that is planned for this
area could not be accomplished without some central clearing house and
as well as some means of tenant education. He also stated, however, that
the Community Center would deal primarily with the housing program and
not emphasize programs such as day care or health care which would ex-
tend more than the four years of the program.
David also stated that the grant application has been reduced from
5 million to 4 million since UDAG is now requiring three public dollars
to one UDAG dollar granted.
David also noted that $20,000 has been added to the small cities grant
application for "services relating to the drafting and implementation of
a new master plan."
Flood Hazard/Wetland Special Permits
Planning Board Aide, Michael Moniz next spoke to the Board of requests
that have been made relevant to reconstruction after storm damage resulting
from the storm of February 6th. In reading the Purpose sectmon of the
Wetland/Flood Hazard zoning ordianance, Michael noted that there was a
condition of "substantial improvement" and that if damage was less than 50%
of the structure than a Special Permit would not have to be issued. Michael
then requested that a screening process be established in order to as-
certain if the work proposed necessatates a Special Permit under the
Wetland/Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance. Michael suggested that perhaps a
• letter to the Building Inspector relevant to the specific cases that do not
require "substantial imprmvement" be issued.
Minutes of 3/23/78 Page 5
. Bill Wheatonthe 1 it. sated;discussion relevant to where the question
of "substantial improvement" should be "flagged" . Walter Power suggested
that Michael Moniz review the proposed work and make the decision on
work that entails obviouly less than 509 damage. Michael would report his
action to the Board and would present any projects that he felt were
questionable as to "substantial improvement" to the Board for them to
review. It was the consensus of the Board Members present that Michael
review all proposed projects and that he be authorized to deal with pro-
jects that called for reconstruction not of a "substantial" nature and
report his actions to the Board. I£, however, a project outlined is
questionable relevant to the proportionate amount of reconstruction
necessary, than the Board would review the project and decide if a
Special Permit is necessary.
• Michael then outlined to the Board the proposed reconstruction work
of a bulkhead proposed by Mr. Thomas Condon of 23 Beach St. , Salem.
Michael noted that he had visited the site on March 9, 1978 and that the
proposed reconstruction work does not "constiture substantial improvement"
as defined in the Salem Zoning Ordinance (Section VII ; Wetlands & Flood
Hazard District) . Michael will issue a letter to the Building Inspector
relevant to this .
Mr. Philip Cahill was present to outline the proposed reconstruction
work to his boat yard at 3 Winter Island Road necessitated by the Feb.
storm. He explained that repairs to his pier were necessary in order
for him to continue his boat yard operations. Michael Moniz reviewed the
improvements Mr. Cahill proposes to make to his pier. Michael explained
• that the existing pier had 6" by 6" piles that were grounded in 6 feet of
silt. The improvements outlined by Mr. Cahill call for 10" by 12" tiles
.Minutes of 2/23/78 Page 6
grounded in 8 feet of silt. He also would include cross bracing on both sides
• of the pier as opposed to the present one side. Mr. Cahill stated that
85' of his 100' pier had been destroyed by the storm. John Brown stated
that in deciding on "substantial improvement" existing structures such as
the office and the railroad could be included in the Board's analysis.
Mr. Cahill estimated the value of the rail road at $75,000 and the office at
$25,000. He further stated that Ocean Services who would be doing the pier
repairs have estimated that reconstruction of the pier will cost $30,000.
Michael Moniz also informed the Board of the following information:
1. That approval for the reconstruction is not required by the Army Corps
of Engineers because the facility was in existence before December 16,
1968, provided that there will be no furhter expansion of facilities and
no filling of Wetlands.
2. That approval is not required by the Department of Environmental Quality
Engineering profided that there will be no filling of wetlands or
dredging.
3. That a Determination of non-applicability has been issued by the Con-
servation Commission because there will be ao additional filling of
wetlands and only reconstruction of structures previouly in existence
before the Feb. 7th storm will take place.
A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by John Brown that
the reconstruction work at Mr. Phillip Cahill's pier at 3 Winter Island
Road, due to damage occurring in the Feb. 7th storm, does not constiute
substantial improvement and that the reconstruction work that will take
place is not in vilation of the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Distruct
Ordinance and does not require filing for a permit provided that only
• reconstruction and repair of previous existing structures will take place and
that there will be no further expansion of facilities or additional filling
of wetlands . The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion
Minutes of 3/23/78 Page 7
• carried.
Mr. Leo Dion was present to explain the bulkhead and pier repairs
at his boAtyard on Glendale St. that are necessitated because of the storm
of February 7th. Mr. Dion explained that he plans to replace his damaged
wood bulkhead with a bulkhead with steel sheeting. He also explained that,
although, he first intended to place the new bulkhead approximately 30
feet in front of the existing one he now plans to place it directly in
front of the disturbed one . He estimated the reconstruction work for his
bulkhead and pier at $150,000.
Michael Moniz also informed the Board of the following information:
1. That approval for the reconstruction is not required by the Army Copps
of Engineers because the facility was in existence before December 16,
• 1968, provided that there will be no further expansion of facilities and
no filling of Wetlands .
2. That approval is not required by the Department of Environmental Quality
Engineering provided that there will be no filling of wetlands or
dredging.
3. That a Determination of Non-Applicability has been issued by the
Conservation Commission because there will be no additional filling of
wetlands and only reconstruction og structures previoulsy in existence
before the Feb. 7th storm will take place .
A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by John Brown that
the reconstruction work at Dion's Boat Yard, due to damage occurring in
the Feb. 7th storm, does not constitute substantial improvement and that
the reconstruction work that will take place is not in violation of the
•
Minutes of 3/23/78 Page 8
• Wetlands and Flood Hazard District Ordinance and does not require filing
for a permit provided that only reconstruction and repair of previously
existing structures will take place and that there will be no further
expansion of facilities or additional filling of wetlands. The vote
was u nimou as nd the Chairman declared the motion carried.
After some further discussion relevant to the Wetland/Flood Hazard
portion of the Zoning Ordinance it was the sense of the Board that
Michael Moniz work with David Lash on various additions to the ordiance.
Master Plan
Cheri Cooper of the Planning Department explained to the Board that
the grant application submitted by the Planning Department to CZM for
monies for a three day symposium on Salem's Waterfront was denied. She
also explained that the Planning Department planned to resubmit this
• application in April. She then requested that the Board consider using
their monies to sponsor this symposium if the grant is denied again.
Cheri then informed the Board that a meeting scheduled by the ConCom
for March 28th is similar in purpose to the meeting on the Environment
Element of the Piaster Plan scheduled by the Planning Bord for April 6th.
Cheri than asked if the Planning Board wanted the complete boards of
those recommended for this subcommittee be invited. It was the sense of
the Board that complete boards be invited.
In the ensuing discussion on the Master Plan it was noted by William
Wheaton that the outline prepared by Cheri from the written suggestions
of the Planning Board members submitted at the last meeting seem quite
complete and he questioned whether further discussion of this element was
necessary before meeting with the subcommittee on April 6th.
•
Minutes of 2/23/78 Page 9
• Joh Brown questioned whether the Planning Board was to s@t down
policies or provide questions that would arrive at policies. He also
questioned whether the final Master Plan is to be a 'broad' document or
will it include specific implementation techniques. He also questioned
if it was the responsibility of the Planning Board to issue policy and
action statements relevant to water conservation and energy conservation
which are out of their realm of expertise. Bill Wheaton added that any
energy policy for the City would have to be voluntary since Salem is too
small a City to influence the actions of surrounding areas.
Cheri stated that historically it is the responsibility of the Planning
Board to develop a master plan. She further stated that it was the main
function of the Planning Board to plan for the future direction of the
City.
• Walter Power stated that relevant to energy the Board could assemble
information that would indicate the future energy nees of the Region and
use the in£rmation to determine where various energy facilities should be
built.
Richard Lutts stated that he thought this was too narrow of an intent
for the Maste rPlan and that broader policies such as a statement
against water pollution would be more appropriate.
Bill Eheaton stated that this kind of policy was too Utipian and
in the long range the question of pollution would have to be one of com-
promise with industry and other existing elements in the City.
Ted Sadoski suggested that broad statments of goals for the City could
be included in a statement of principle in the Master Plan.
•
Minutes of 3/23/78 Page 10
Bill Wheaton agreed that a statment of principles be included as well as
some set of priorities and concrete directions for the next ten years.
Bill also stated that he thought a new set of priorities for vacant land
in Salem was needed. For example, if various studies indicate that more
water will be needed for Salem in the future, than definite plans should be
made to preserve some future supplies.
Cheri stated that when all the statistics relevant to Salem's eco-
nomic base are compiled than it could be decided what programs and actions
the City can support.
It was the consensus of the Board that the time period from
7:30-9:30 P.M. on April 6th be allocated to the Subcommittee meeting.
Boad of Appeal Agenda
After a brief discussion is was the consensus of the Board that
no recommendations be forwarded to the Board of Appeal relevant to
their agenda 66 March 28, 1978.
A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by Paul D'Amour
to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
111 �.SlEtll� �[bS�TC�IISE #'3
'� �� �lattttittg �narl
(Our -9+ttlem (Sreett
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
APRIL 6, 19?8
1Subcommittee meeting for the Master Plan
2. Master Plan - Trading of Master Plans (Cheri Cooper)
3. Loring Hills (William Tinti)
4. Pickman Park (William Tinti)
5. Form A - Roman Catholic Archbishop of Boston
6. Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit - Salem Willows Yacht Club (M. Moniz)
7. Reminder: Next meeting is public hearing for New England Power
•
Ctv1 111 tt�Ptll, �M85MC LI2E tS
'��c�` �tlQ �ulPm �tePtt
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD APRIL 6, 19?8, 7:30 P.M.
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Walter Power, Paul.D'Amour, Ted Sadoski, Abby Burns,
Donald Hunt, (E!L�TYia'm Wheaton, Richard Lutts
:f
Member Absent: John Brown
Chairman Walter Power opened the meeting with various City agencies
relevant to the City's Master Plan by explaining that the completed
Master Plan will consist of seven elements and that the element to be
discussed at this time is "The Environment" . He further explained that
there were 5 subsections to this element: Open Space, Natural Resources,
Recreation, Man and environment, and Land Use.
• C� He went on to state that this meeting would be divided into two
sections. The first part would consist of a representative from each
department or board present stating the future plans and goals each has
for Salem. The second portion of the meeting would deal with discussion
of the various ideas and goals presented.
Walter then asked James Rienhardt to speak for the Conservation
Commission. Jim explained that in addition to the City's Master Plan,
the Conservation Commislion is responsible for a Conservation, Open Space
and Recreation Plan in order to remain eligible for State and Federal
Grants. In siting the goals the Commission has for the coming year, Jim
highlighted the following:
1. The Forest River Conservation land acquisition for which the City has
received State and Federal funding.
• 2. The transfer of various Salem Harbor Islands to the custody of the
Minutes of 4/6/78 Page 2
Conservation Commission.
• 3. Utilization of the CZM Plan which has been approved and is a potential
funding source. Jim noted that the Salem Harbor Islands and the Forest
River area have been identified in this Plan as ciritical environmental
areas .
4. The ConCom is working with the Planning Board in order to coordinate
and'streamline' the requirements of the Wetlands Protection Act as well
as the Wetlands and Flood Hazard City Zoning Ordinance.
5. The Commission will be working with the City's Department of Public
.forks to promote water conservation.
6. The Commission is also working for the possible identification of
future critical resource areas in the City.
Larry McIntyre of the Recreation Department outlined the following
• concerns:
1. Lack of playing fields in the City. He noted that there were lots
of playgrounds, but that they were primarily tot fields. He pointed out
that the dump on Marlborough Rd., which consists of 16 acres, could be
utilized for an additional sport's field for the City.
2. The location of the Recreation Department is currently at the Willows,
but for the future he would like to see permanent space for the Recre-
ation Department at Winter Island.
3. He also pointed out that the existing playgrounds need to be upgraded
and could use additional equipment.
John Adhern, representing the Park Department, next outlined their
priorities for the future. The following were the points touched upon:
i
Minutes of 4/6/78 Page 3
• 1. He explained that it was the function of the Parks Department to
acquire and maintain the City's parks, as well as other land owned by
the City. He further stated that he thought there was a need for the
municipal golf course to be expanded to 18 holes.
2. He also explained that there was some discussion whether the Forest
River Tidal gates were to be opened or closed during the summer. He
noted that they were open last summer and as a result there was no
swimming. He stated that the Parks Department wants them closed this
summer.
3. He also stated that the plans for Kernwood Park were approved and that
the bids were out for the project. He noted that the contractor has not
been choosen at this point. He further outlined that the park, when
completed, would provide passive recreation. It will contain a parking area,
• attendent facilities, walkways, bike route as well as light recreation
such as shuffleboard and swings. Ted Sadoski, questioned why no beach was
planned. Mr. Adhern replied that a beach could be 'planned at some future
time but it is not part of the current plan.
4. Mr. Foley of the Parks Department added that the City has need of a
hockey area as well as a new clubhouse at the golf course.
Harbormaster Ralph Hobbs reported first on the state Bf the harbor
at the present time. He noted that the City had been commended by the
Coast Guard for the booming devices being used and for the low level of
pollution in the harbor. He noted that there was a need, however, for a
shellfish constable . lie also stated that he had no authority relative
to the Harbor Islands and that the Salem Police had to be called when
there was a disturbance. He noted that there was one town landing at
•
Minutes of 4/6/78 Page 4
. Congress St. and one City float at Derby Wharf.
Philip Moran of the Waterways Advisory Board (WAB) stated that he
thought that afull time Harbormaster Department should be established.
He added that he had approached the Mayor relevant to this and the next
step would be to present it to the City Council. He also stated that the
WAB wants to be involved with any decisions relevant to Winter Island.
He noted that Hydrodredge would install a launching ranp for the City and
that the large hanger could be used for boat storage. He also noted that
part of the land could also be used for overnight campers.
He went on to state that the WAB had voted unanimously not to support
the Conservation Commission's efforts to acquire custody of the Harbor
Islands. He explained that he was of the opinion that there were enough
state statutes for the protection of the Islands and that if the ConCom
• gained custody of the Islands then they might prevent public access to
the islands. He also stated that the WAB had not been informed of what
plans were being made for the Forest River area after the land is acquired.
He also informed the people present at the meeting that the WAB feels
that the CZM Plan is repetitive and that the WAB did not support it.
They thought it would just create another beuracy. He also stated that
Collins Cove could be used for a marin if 'dry dredging' were utilized.
Jim Rienhardt stated that the Mayor had testified in favor of the
CZM Plan and that the support of CZM was City policy. Mr. Moran answered
that the Mayor had testified with reservations. Brian French of the
Conservation Commission stated that even when the Commission obtained
custody of the Harbor Islands, the Commission would not have the
authority to prevent public access to the Islands .
Minutes of 46/78 Page 5
•
City Engineer, Anthony Fletcher, speaking for SESD stated that
the District was presently trying to obtain a waiver from the present
requirement of secondary treatment. He epplained that if secondary
treatment was required then a dike would have to be placed across
Smith Pool and chemicals added. He further stated that this action
would eliminate Cat Cove.
Ann Pelletier from the Engineering Department spoke relevant to
future plans for solid waste. She stated that in the future it will go
into the area we're located in rather thaii"the present practice. of
trucking it to Amesburry. She further explained that by 1981 there are
plans for 3 areas to deal with the solid waste of our region. She added
that these areas would also deal with resource recovery and sale of
energy.
Tony Fletcher, representing the Salem Department of Public 'Works,
stated that Phase I of the sewer work is being completed and that bids were
now being taken for the south western section of the City. He further
stated that verbal commitments had been obtained for Phase III to begin in
1981.
Relevant to water supply, Tony stated that there would be an updating
of the water system in the next five years. He stressed that this update
would not involve treatment or quanity, both of which is satisfactory,
but the distribution of it.
With this, the presentation section of the meeting was ended and
Chairman Walter Power opened the question and discussion portion of the
meeting.
•
Minutes of 4/6/?8 Page 6
• The Board was first questioned why the City Council was not present
at this meeting. Cheri Cooper and Walter Power expiained. that Brian
O'Keefe, liasson Council member to the Board, had planned to attend, but
that he was ill. It was pointed out that the Community Development
subcommittee would be meeting in the near future and that they would be
informed Bf the results of this meeting and that their input would
certainly be encouraged. Cheri also pointed out that she had met with
the City Council previously relevant to introducing the scope for the
Master Plan.
Abby Burns questioned the difference between the Waterways Advisory
Board (WAB) and the ConCom relevant to the Harbor Islands. Mr. Moran
explained that at one time you could camp overnight on Great Misery Island,
but now that it was controlled by the Trustees of 2eservation, overnight
camping is not allowed. He stated that the WAR felt that if the ConCom
were custodians for the remaining Islands they could arbitarily prevent
access to these islands by the general public. He pointed out that it
requires only a simple majority to grant custody of the -L-Islands to the
ConCom and it would take a 3/4 vote to take it away.
Brian French ansered Mr. Moran by stating that the Commission does
not want to own the ilands merely protect them. He again stated that
being granted custody of the Tslands would not give the Commission the
right to prevent access. In fact, the laws governing custodianship
would prohibitlthe Commission from dening access to the Islands.
Mr. Moran stated that although he 'had no argrument with the present
ConCom' that a future Commislion could prevent access to the islands.
Harbormaster, Ralph Hobbs stated that he had already received requests
from people from Boston to camp on some of the Islands.
Minutes of 4/6/78 Page 7
Walter Power ended this discussion by stating that these differences
of opinion should be discussed and resolved in future subcommittee
meetings.
Donald Hunt questioned Ralph Hobbs if he thought the City needed a
full time Harbormaster. Ralph Hobbs replied affirmatively.
Don next questioned the impact the dredging of Collins Cove and
accompanying marina would have on the swimming facilities in that area.
Mr. Moran of the WAB stated that there had been 2 studies done. The
first one by Tufts called for traditional dredging, but that the 'dry
dredging' proposed by American East Corp would be much quicker and
would have less impact.
Ted Sadoski questioned what plans there were for street improvement. Mr.
Fletcher pointed out that Salem hadn't put in a new road in 30 years.
He did state, however, that there would be curb and drainage work done
on the streets. Ted next questioned if the pland for the connector
road include major street repairs. Tony stated that the installation of
the connector road would call for the improvement of only the rjajor
roads.
Bill 'Wheaton questioned the extent of fishing possible in Salem.
Ralph Hobbs pointed out that commercial fish could be increased if
facilities for dockage could be increased. He stated that it the present
time the only dockage for commercial fishermen was a small facility
in back of Shetland Properties. iIr. Hobbs also pointed out that there
was no net fishing allowed from Winter Island to Maugus Point.
Minutes of 4/6/78 Page 8
• Ted Sadoski questioned the possible location of other public landings.
Ralph Hobbs stated that Kernwood Park may have a mArina in the futuee and
that a portion of that could%be,used. He also stated that the ends of
Turner St. and Blanney St. also presented possibilities. Tony Fletcher
pointed out that the lee side of Winter Island could be utilized for
fishermen. Paul D'Amour stated that utilization of Winter Island would
have to be a joint decision of the subcommittee and the Planning Board of
what would be most beneficial to the City.
Mr. Foley stated that a long range tree program is needed. He pointed
out that, at the present time there was not enough funds and that the
planting through his department consisted of Norway Maples. He stated
that he would like to see more of a variety in plantings and would like
• to be utilizing flowering trees as well.
Walter Power stated that any existing water supplies, including
abandoned wells should be reserved for possible future use. Brad Northrup,
of the Conservation Commission, stressed that Thompson's meadow should be
protected. Tony Fletcher pointed out that major seconaary water supplies
in Salem were under the control of Marblehead.
Ted Sadoski question Mr. Adhern relative to the access road into the
proposed Kernwood park from Kernwood Ave. Mr. Adhern stated that the
access had been changed so that it now "slopes in gradually."
Brad Northrup stated that the ConCom is in the process of doing an
inventory of all vacant land in the City by means of a land use map.
Larry McIntyre representing the Recreation Department presented a
map which marked all the playgrounds now- existing in the City with the
• exception of school playgrounds. He further stated that the need for a
play ground was critical for Witchcraft Heights. He also noted that the
common was not under the direct jurisdiction of the Parks or Recreation
Departments .
Minutes of 4/6/78 Page 9
• The City Engineer was next questioned on the future of the rNorth
River. Mr. Fletcher responed by stating that the most significant
changes will come with the Connector Rd. He stated that present plans
call for the North River to be enclosed to the North River over-
pass. He added that it would always be a wetted area but with pumping
facilities it could be utilized. Richard Lutts pointed out that a large
commuter parking lot also has to be planned for the possible blue line
extension as well as the connector road.
Relevant to Land Use Walter Power outlined some issues that could be
considered by the subcommittee. Among some of his suggestions were:
possible additional uses for the City's cemetaries, an analysis of present
housing patterns as well as addressing the issues of density and off
street parking.
• At this time, Walter Power appointed Jim Rienhardt to head the
Environment Subcommittee. Donald Hunt and Paul D'Amour will represent
the Planning Board on this subcommittee. Jim Rienhardt asked that each
of the City agencies that were invited to this evening's meeting appoint
one person for the subcommittee. The subcommittee will hold their first
meeting Monday, April 24, 1978. A report from this subcommittee will be
presented to the Planning Board at their May 4th meeting.
Loring Hills
City Engineer, Tony Fletcher, stated that the plans for Loring
Hills Developers Trust have been amended to include all the conditions
requested by the Planning Board. Ted Sadoski questioned if the City
Engineer forsees any problems with the utilities if the right of way
is extended. 1.4r. Fletcher stated that, in his opinion, there would
• be no problem.
Minutes of 4/6/7S Page 10
• Since there was still a question relevant to a performance guarantee,
City Solicitor Bill Tinti was called. He advised that the plans be signed,
but returned by the Planning Board until a covenant relevant to the per-
formance guarantee was agreed upon.
Form A - Catholic Archbishop of Boston .
Attorney Costello, representing the Catholic Archbishop of Boston,
was present to describe what was intended. The approval of the Form A
would enable the transfer of a part of one existing lott,owne/by the
Catholic Archbishop of Boston to be added to the abutting property.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Abby Burns to endorse
the Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control
Law. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion
carried.
• Wetland/Flood hazard Special Permit
Michael Moniz outlined the reconstructia-i work proposed for the
Salem Willows Yacht Club. He explained that reconstruction would restore
the facilities to their condition before the February 6th storm. There
would also be the construction of a holding tank and pump. Michael noted
that the ConCom had voted that the Wetlands Protection Act was not
applicable to the work proposed. After a brief discussion a motion was
made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Richard Lutts that the reconstruction
work at Salem Yacht Club, due to damage occurring in the Feb 6th storm,
does not constitute substantial improvement and that the reconstruction
work that will take place is not in violation of the Wetlands and Flood
Hazard District Ordinance and does not require filing for a permit provided
that only reconstruction and repair of previous existing structures will
take place and that there will be no further expansion of facilities
or additional filling of wetlands. The bote was unanimous and tn- Chair-
man declared the motion carried.
I:inutes of 4/6/78 Page 11
A motion tras made by Abby Burns and seconded by Richard Lutts to
adjourn the meeting at 10:50 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
CtV of S-Nttlent, Aussac4use##s
• � � '.� � �lattllilta �IIartl
OnP Ot1lpm Grua
MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD APRIL 20, 1978, 7 :30 PM,
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MA^ RE NEW ENGLAND POWER SERVICE
COMPANY'S PETITION FOR A WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN
AGITATOR IN AN EXISTING TANK FOR THE PURPOSE OF A COAL-SLURRY RESEARCH PROJECT TO-BE
LOCATED AT THE NEW ENGLAND POWER FACILITY ON FORT AVENUE SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: John Brown, Jr. , Abby Burns, Paul D'Amour, Peter DiGangi, Donald Hunt,
Ted Sadoski, Bill Wheaton
Members Absent: Richard Lutts, Walter Power III
Attending from New England Power: Albert Lindquist, David Beattie, James DiVito,
Andrew Wood, John Shea
In the absence of Chairman Power, Donald Hunt declared a quorum present and opened
the Hearing at 7:30 P.M. The Acting Chairman read the Notice of the Public Hearing as
it appeared in the Salem Evening News, April 6 & 13, 1978, and introduced the representa-
tives of New England Power that were present.
• Mr. DiVito, Senior Engineer, exhibited a plan of the Salem Harbor Station and stated
that the tank in question is a S-3 tank, within an earthen dike at elevation 17, bottom
set at elevation 14. The tank is an existing steel-bottomed tank, 36' high with a
density of 48' , and can contain 16,000 barrels of fluid or 680,000 gallons. The intent
is to put in a C-5 mixture and an agitator will have to be installed to keep this mixture
in suspension; in addition a truss will be constructed for support. This tank is located
in a flood zone, therefore the necessity for a Special Permit.
Mr. Andrew Wood, Project Engineer for New England Power, pointed out that this is
a research Energy Conservation Project of a year's duration to determine the economic
and technical feasibility of mixing pulverized coal and oil. Replying to a question as
to where the coal would be pulverized and stored, Mr. Wood stated the coal would be
pulverized in a reconditioned existing building and assured the Board that all existing
codes would be complied with.
When questioned about the noise level, Mr. Wood replied the agitator would have a
75 HP motor that would run continuously and they didn't expect it to make any appreciable
noise. He explained there are many motors that are in operation 24 hours a day that
are much larger than this one.
Mr. Wood advised that the tank is currently being used for #2 oil. New England
Power will have to file with the Dept. of Public Safety for alterations to the tank
and said he believed the tank will be tested before operation of same.
Minutes of the Public Hearing of 4/20/78 Page 2
Ted Sadoski/ asked asked if the City Engineer had reviewed the plans. The Acting Chair-
man read a letter received from Tony Fletcher, in which he stated the plan was in con-
currence with requirements. Mr. Hunt noted that the Conservation Commission had sent
back their notification requesting more information. Michael Moniz, Planning Board Aide,
informed the Board that in a telephone conversation today with Brian French of the
Conservation Commission, Mr. French said all the Commission's questions had been answered
satisfactorily. Daniel Mansur, Asst. Building Inspector, has notified the Board that
they find the project to be in concurrence with requirements.
George Barbeau, 8 Memorial Drive, Salem, stated that residents of the area have
been concerned with the coat dust situation for thirty years. Coal for this project would
have to come in by ship, and he was afraid that winds would blow the coal dust around
all summer long. He said he could remember that in the past area residents were not
able to keep their windows open in the summer. Paul D'Amour wanted to know where the
raw product would be stored when it came in. Mr. Wood answered that the piles would
be located in the same place as in the past, with an underground conveyor beneath the
piles. Mr. Wood noted they were talking about 50,000 tons of coal over the whole project
the project to be of 1 - 1� year's duration. He further stated that the coal will not
be unloaded in the same manner as it was years ago. The coal will be unloaded by a clam
• shell and conveyed over to the area, provisions being made to put a snout on the conveyor
where it is is dropping to prevent coal from falling any distance in the wind. The
larger portion of the pile that will be inactive will be sealed and specifications and
plans will be drawn up to install additional sprays. The coal pile would be no higher
than the present level - about 30 feet.
Mr. Sadoski said he didn't believe, under the Wetland's and Flood Hazard regulations
for a Special Permit, that the subject of coal was a matter of concern before the
Planning Board. However, Mr. Sadoski said the Planning Board was deeply concerned
about what effect the use of the coal would have on the community and asked if it would
be feasible or practical to consider the placement of a downward screen along the coal
pile. Mr. Ward replied that if there was a particularly windy day, the problem could
be avoided by not handling the coal.
Robert Shea, Larkin Lane, expressed concern over what would be coming out of the
stacks and wanted to know just what conditions the area would experience. Mr. Wood
replied that this would be a research project and New England Power would hope to meet
present limitations. Mr. Shea also asked what would happen if damage was caused by
what came out of the stacks, and Mr. Wood replied New England Power would be subject
. to whatever the regulations imposed and also that the company had answered this type
of questioning for the EPA.
Minutes of the Public Hearing of 4/20/78 Page 3
• Mr. David Beattie, Manager of Community Relation for New England Power, advised
that company policy will be no different than it has been in the past - if a problem
is caused in the neighborhood, NEP will take care of it. Mr. Beattie emphasized that
his company was in close contact with people in the neighborhood, that he had visited
door-to-door with the residents. Also, Mr. Beattie said a meeting held at the Bentley
School with the EPA was well attended.
After further discussion on the coal dust problem, the Acting Chairman recommended
that New England Power send a letter to the Planning Board re the feasibility of putting
in some form of a wind screen to prevent coal dust from blowing around.
There being no further questions or comments, the Acting Chairman declared the
Public Hearing closed at 8:25 P.M.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD APRIL 20, 1978, 8:30 P.M. , THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MA.
Acting Chairman Donald Hunt opened the Regular Meeting of the Planning Board at
8:30 P.M.
A motion was made by P. D'Amour, seconded by T. Sadoski, and unanimously voted to
approve the Minutes of the Meeting of March 23, 1978, as copied and presented to Members
• at the Meeting of April 6, 1978. The Acting Chairman declared the motion carried.
Michael Moniz advised that a meeting of the Subcommittee on the Environment will
be held on April 24, 1978, '7:40 PM, One Salem Green. Discussion will be held on water
and air quality, land use, Winter Island and:iCollins Cove. Also to be discussed will
be the marina project for Collins Cove that was proposed by American East Developers
Corp. , Lynn, as well as public landings, marinas, open space along the water, and park
facilities. The connector road will be discussed with reference to the North River and
the possibility of culverting the river. Further, there will be discussion about zoning
Commercial Street as an Industrial zone. The Subcommittee will present its findings
and recommendations on policy at the next Planning Board meeting.
Mr. Moniz said that contracts had been executed with Carol Johnson Associates
for Collins Cove. Design work was started last Friday and, hopefully, the first phase
will be completed within a month or so. This will include three neighborhood meetings
in May.
HUD representatives from the Flood Hazard Insurance Administration visited the office.
Stone & Webster will be remapping the City's floodplain maps inasmuch as the last storm
proved the maps were off. The maps will be on a city 400 scale map and will be available
• in about two years. The Conservation Commission is going to send out a mailing to people
in flood hazard areas and directly along the coast. An informational letter about
the Elood Hazard Ordinance will be included in the mailing.
Minutes of the Meeting of 4/20/78 Page 4
• Discussion was held on New England Power's petition for a Special Permit. A motion
was made by Bill Wheaton, seconded by Abby Burns, to approve the petition of New England
Power Service Company for a Wetlands and Flood Hazard Special Permit to construct an
agitator in an existing tank for the purpose of a coal-slurry research project to be
located at the New England Power facility on Fort Avenue, Salem.
The following voted "Aye": John Brown, Abby Burns, Peter DiGangi, Bill Wheaton,
Donald Hunt, Ted Sadoski.
Paul D'Amour voted "Present".
The Chairman declared the motion carried.
The Board discussed the Board of Appeal Agenda for the April 25, 1978 meeting.
It was the consensus of the Board to send a letter to the Appeal Board recommending that
Mr. Henry Jalbert's petition for a Direct Appeal (399 Jefferson Avenue, R-1 District)
to convert the third floor into a full apartment and install a dormer at the rear of
the third level be denied because of density and lack of parking.
Members also suggested a letter be sent to the Board of Appeal recommending that
the petition of Wayne M. Parker, 6 Prince Street, (R-3) for a Special Permit to operate
a taxi firm at said premises be turned down because of the traffic problem and lack of
• parking in the area and because this location is in the UDAG area.
A motion was made by Bill Wheaton, seconded by Ted Sadoski and unanimously voted
to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 P.M.
r
Respectfully submitted,
•
i i.rr+lirvjlan;!I'nm:
New England Power Service
^.I (e,it:;et;•,n r,
CITY OF SALEM
PLANNING BOARD
Flood Hazard Special Permit Hearing
One Salem Green
3rd Floor Conference Room
April 20, 1978 7:30 p.m.
SYSTEM ATTE14DEES
Albert V. Lindquist Salem Harbor Plant Superintendent
David J. Beattie Manager of Community Relations
James A. Di Vito Senior Engineer - Civil Engineering
Department
Andrew M. Wood Project Engineer
John M. Shea Engineer of Property Records
A New England Electric System company
Ctu ltf �$ttlent, assac4usdts
. , F Vlatutix% ' uarl
(one �Falpm GLPFtt
Planning Board Agenda
May 4, 1978
1. Approval of Minutes of April 20, 1978
Motion Second
2. Report of the Environment Subcommittee
3. Master Plan Discussion
4. Board of Appeal Agenda
5. Budget
6. Housing Review
7. Correspondance
rcj,,conv�y• c
•
�• ' w .Y, �o �l�zttt�itt� marl
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD MAYI ,�, .1978, 7:30 P.M. ,
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM,. ONE..SALEM GREEN, SALEM . MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Walter.Power, Abby Burns, John Brown, Paul D'Amour,
Donald Hunt, Ted Sadoski, Richard Lutts, Peter
DiGangi
Member Absent: William Wheaton
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the meeting in session
at 7:30 P.M.
A motion was made by Ted Sadoski and seconded by Abby Burns to
accept the minutes of April 20, 1978 as written. The vote was unanimous
and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
James Rienhardt, of the Conservation Commission, was present to give
the Environment Subcommittee report. Jim began by thanking the Planning
Board for allowing the subcommittee process in the first place. He
stated that the Subcommittee worked well together and that disagree-
ments that came up were able to be resolved. He further stated that the
Subcommittee has recommended various objectives for the City as well as
various action strategies and that it would now be up to the Planning
Board to evaluate it relevant to future policy for the City.
Relevant to the Subcommittee report itself, Ted Sadoski questioned
why, on page 1, only the land in the South River flood control area was
identified as a sensitive area. Jim replied that the South River was
noted as an example;of areas that should be preserved for future
• use.
Meeting of 5/4/78 Page 2
Jim next noted that the Subcommittee recommends that the Forest
• River tidal gates remain open except in emergency situations such as oil
spills, to ensure the continuous flushing of the salt marsh, thus
preserving the natural ecosystme. Jim also stated that a public
hearing on the tidal gates will be held to inform residents and city
officials of the environmental problems associated with the closing of the
tidal gates. Ted Sadoski questioned who has the responsibility to open
or close the gates . Mr. Rienhardt replied that the authority rested
with the Parks Commission.
Mr. Rienhardt also noted that the City Council had voted unanimously
on April 27, 1978 for the land taking necessary for the Forest River
Acquisition.
Relevant to the North River, Jim noted that the subcommittee
• questions the advisability of a culvert as possibly increasing pmllution.
Jim also stated that the Subcommittee advocates further study and dis-
cussion of this before any action plan is arrived at. Jim also noted
that a letter has been received from Anthony Fletcher, which also
addresses the issue of culverting the North River. Jim explained that
Tony's letter deals with the North River from an engineering standpoint
and does not necessarily conflict with the findings of the subcommittee.
He also urged that the Board regard the letter from Mr. Fletcher as
part of the subcommittee report and not as a separate document.
Ted Sadoski stated that he thought the Planning Board in conjunction
with the Conservation Commission should do an in depth analysis of the
North River situation. He noted that from a first reading of Mr.
Fletcher's letter it appears that nothing is going to be done in the near
Y� 4.
(Otte -'Mlrtn (greed
•
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 3
• future to correct the North River situation and that the alternative
Mr. Fletcher is proposing will cost millions of dollars.
Abby Burns questioned the reference to "a comprehensive sewer use
ordinance" contained in the City Engineer's letter. Jim replied that it
was unfortunate that Tony's letter was not received in time for the
Subcommittee to review it.
Jim Rienhardt continued the review of the subcommittee's report
by next commenting on Winter Island. Jim stated that the subcommittee
agreed that "the development of Winger Island for public use and enjoyment
should be a joint effort by City Boards and agencies including Park
Department, Recreation Department, Waterways Advisory Board, Public
Works Department and Conservation Commitsion. He added, however, that the
question of who will have the "ultimate authority" over Winter Island needs
• further analysis by the Planning Board. He noted that the Recreation
Department wants to move their headquarters to Winter Island, but it
would have to be up to the Planning Board if this is - in the best
interest of the City.
Relevant to "Waterfront Orientation" Jim stated that projections
for future use will be more redily arrived at when theresults of the
waterfront study presently being completed by the Planning Department is
available.
Relevant to the "Salem Harbor Islands" Jim stated that "the
consensus of the Subcommittee was divided as to implementation of the
strategies for the Harbor Islands." He pointed out that the Islands
in question consist primarily of shoals and not much land mass.
•
vClty of �zletu, itt�s�tcl��tsE##
Platttting I�aarl •
(Otte Output (gCPPtt
•
•
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 4
• Relevant to Marinas, the Subcommittee listed the Collins Cove area
as the top priority. It was also the consensus of the Subcommittee
that the Tudts Study that was done pertaing to marina possibilities was
too limited in scope. Jim also stated that with the new dredging tech-
niques proposed in the study sponsored by the Waterways Advisory Board
the project will probably be more acceptable to the Conservation
Commission.
Relevant to "Town Landings/Commercial Fishing", Jim noted that most
of the input came from Harbormaster Ralph Hobbs.
Regarding"Recreation", Jim noted that Larry McIntryre identified the
need for an additional field as a high priority. Jim urged that the
Planning Board consider sites that could provide multi-use courts.
Relevant to "Additional Park Improvements" Jim noted that the Parks
• Department has recommended extending the golf course to 18 holes, but
4im pointed out that the Subcommittee as a whole was not sure that this
is necessary. Cheri Cooper stated that the Parks Department also has
some doubts concerning this possible project and that they too feel
that additional studies should be made.
Jim noted that the Parks Commission has stated that they need
"assistance in determining which facilities need alterations, when, and
how." Jim stated that they have acknowledged that they do not have the
professional expertise on their Board to deal with future plans for
Salem's Parks.
Jim also stated that the subcommittee also recommends that"ownership
responsibility for all park, recreation and play areas become under the
• Park Commission." He explained that current ownership and responsibility
of playground areas is divided among several different authorities.
Jim also asked the Planning Board to consider the desirability and
feasibility of consolidating the Parks and Recreation Departments.
O'lli#p of �zlenr, �t1M�s�tcl�use##s
A �p �luttttittg �uarl
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 5
• Abby Burns questioned how difficult it would be for Salem to obtain
ownership of the Common from the Federal Government. Cheri Cooper stated
that Mr. Foley has made inquiries but that it has proved difficult to
ascertain what department of the Federal Government actually owns the
Common.
Relevant to"Air Quality" Jim pointed out that the Subcommittee felt
most strongly about the creation of a greenbelt.
Relevant to "Water Quality" it was stated by the Subcommittee that
"the #1 problem facing the City of Salem in the next 10-20 yearsc; is
the distribution of water." John Brown questioned whether this was
the #1 problem relevant to "Water Quality" or the #1 overall problem.
Cheri Cooper stated that this was the #1 overall problem for Salem in
the future. She also stated that all outmoded pipes in Salem will have
• to be replaced.
Walter Power questioned when the City would need to use the
proposed Reservoir 30B in Ipswich. Cheri Cooper stated that Salem
would need it by 2020.
Cheri Cooper next discussed a handout she had prepared entitled
"Using the Subcommittee Reports to Develop the Master Plan" . She
suggested that Board members review the subcommittee's report on "En-
vironment" as well as the Planning Boards and Planning Departments
reports on the "Environment" in order to determine what will be the
policy statements and action strategies contained in the Master Plan.
Cheri also suggested that this be done for the next Planning Board
meeting. After the Board determines the policies to be included in the
Master Plan then Cheri will write it up.
•
of ` IT1Erit� IMSSstIC��LtSE t3
�, ' � ` ;,E` g �Cauiiiug �uarl •
OnE #nlrm (grren
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 6
• John Brown questioned how extensive the "Environment" section
of the Master Plan will be. Cheri estimated that since the data from
the Conservation's blue book will be included in the Master Plan, this
section of the Master Plan will be longer than other elements and should
be about fifty pages. Mr. Brown then asked if a shorter overview of
the Master Plan will also be done. Cheri stated that she had proposed
a "glossy" overview of the Master Plan to be used for grant applications
and in conjunction with tourism when she first discussedthe Master Plan
with the Board.
Walter Power questioned the time schedule for the finalizing of
the Environment section. Cheri suggested that discussion of the sub-
committees report as well as the other reports could be discussed at
the next Planning Board meeting on May 25, 1978. The Environment element
• could then be completed at the June lst meeting. Also at the June lst
meeting the subcommittee for the "Private Sector" could be formed.
This subcommittee would then report back to the Board at the June 22nd
meeting. Cheri pointed out that less time would have to be spent on
the remaining elements of the Master Plan. Cheri also reminded members
that she needed the Master Plans back that she had given Board Members.
Housing Review Board
Councillors Centorino, Usovicz,"and O'Keefe were present to discuss
the Housing Review Board that is being proposed by Councillor Centorino.
Councillor Centorino stated that there were rent grievance boards
in Lowell and Waltham at the present time and that his proposal was
almost identical to theirs. He further explained that his original
proposal called for the board to be comprised of 3 persons who were
• tenants, 3 persons who were landlords and one person who lived in a single
family dwelling. He stated that originally it had been proposed that
3a ' '� '�..,.� g �1211tltiltg �Dal'� •
9A 4�
(One *alem &rru
•
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 7
• this Board'iinvestigate tenant complaints and that it be enpowered to deny
rent increases when' the landlord is in violation of the sanitary or
building code or when the Board determined that it was an unreasonable
rent increase. He then explained that he had received a great amount of
input from Waltham and Lowell and that they felt the program was a
great success. Councillor Centorino also admitted that he did not think
the City Council would approve of the part of the proposal that gave
the proposed Board the power to deny an "unreasonable rent increase" . He
did point out, however, that the primary reason for this board is to
provide a mechanism for code enforcement. He stated that he did not
have the final proposal finished but that he was looking for input.
Abby Burns questioned the kind of staffing that was expected.
Councillor Usovicz stated that the proposed make up of the staff was
• "confused as of now" but that he felt that the staffing should come from
the staff that already exists.
Ted Sadoski stated that if the aim is code enforcement then he did
not think that the creation of another Board would solve the problem.
Donald Hunt expressed the same doubt as Ted and questioned what right
any City board would have to enter someone's home. Councillor Centtorino
stated that board members would not be empowered to enter homes and that
there were four people from the Building Inspector's office alone that
were already empowered to do this and that there were also other people
in other City departments empowered to do this.
Ted Sadoski then questioned that if the mechanism for code
enforcement already exists then he could not see why an additional
Board was needed. Councillor Centorino stated that if there were
• public complaints then there might be more incentive for the owners
VTi#g !1fleiii, IM�s�zcl�ixsex#
�';,',,w '�g" �Icltillt2ta �uarl •
Wur Oittlem (grern
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 8
• to comply with the building code.
Councillor O'Keefe stated that there would be more protection for
the individual if such a. board .. was ''ormed.
Peter DiGangi questioned whether the creation of this Board would
just serve to complicate the process that now exists. He pointed out
that any Board's decision could be appealed and that it could still
end up in :-;;District Court which would merely be adding another step to
"wear the tenant down." Councillor Centorino pointed out that both the
Lowell and Waltham Boards have informed him that very few cases have
ended up in court.
Paul D'Amour stated that this Board could represent a step towards
rent control which could hinder future development of the City. Councillor
O'Keefe stated that this Board would not represent rent control and that
• its emphasis is on code enfoicement.
John Brown stated that if stricter ordinances are needed then they
should be written, if the problem is with enforcement, then something
should be done there. John did not believe that the creation of this
Board would significantly alter the current situation. He also stated
that the Board could be interpreted by developers as the start of rant
control and could discourage future investment in the City.
Ted Sadoski questinned what authority, under state statue, this
board would have. Councillor Centorino stated that at this time, there
is no state statue granting authority.
Councillor Centorino also pointed out that in 1974 it was estimated
that 49% of the rental property in Salem was substandard, and that the
• present form of code enforcement"was not working" . . Walter Power
agreed that this was a major problem facing the City, but that he thought
•4
of �ttleru, ��z�szcclfu$P##�
' � � ��cIlill[lt$ �IIaTI
Minutes of 5/4/78 Page 9
a possible solution was to reorganize the code enforcement officers
and to encourage stricter enforcement of the building and sanitary codes.
Councillor Centorino stated that if this Board were to be created
it would be reviewed by the Mayor and City Council each year. As a
result, if it was felt that the Board was discouraging economic devel-
opment, then it could be disbanded.
Planning Board Budget
Board members were informed that money left in the budget has to
be encumbered by May 12, 1978 for the rest of the year. It was the
consensus of the Board members present that monies be transferred from
various line items to the Consultant Account to be used for work as-
sociated with the Master Plan.
It was also the consensus of those present that the Planning Board
• Dinner be held on June 9, 1987 and that Abby Burns investigate various
facilities for the dinner.
Board of Appeal Agenda
The Board of Appeal Agenda for May 9, 1978 was reviewed by the
Board. It was the consensus of those members present that no letters
be _arwarded to the Board of Appeal.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
of �ttleiu, ��ttss�tcl�u�P#ts
Otte 2Writt GIPPtt
•
i
•
�^ w � ' �lattttittg �uartl
(Otte .0ttlem Gfeett
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
May 25, 1978
1. Approval of Minutes of the meeting of April 6, 1978
2. Approval of Minutes of the meeting of May 4, 1978
3. Pickering Wharf - Non Conforming signs
4. Storm damage - Assessors Map 37 Lot 61 - Nondas Lagonakis
5. Planning Board Aide report - Michael Moniz
6. Request from Mr. Jalbert for the Planning Board to have the Board
of Appeal reconsider their denial for his variance request.
7. Board of Appeal Agenda
8. Planning Board Dinner
9. Master Plan - Discussion of "Environment" element
10. Correspondence
11. Adjourn
P.S . The Planning Department has challenged the Engineering Department
to a softball game on May 30, 1978 - any volunteers from the
Board to play would be greatly appreciated!
•
Ctv of!,$atent, �fflttssac4ueftts
�; .w' : g �ltttutitta �uartl
(Otte onle 11 (ACPPiI
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD MAY 25, 1978, 7:30 P.M. THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM,GREEN, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Donald Hunt, Paul D'Amour, Richard Lutts, William Wheaton,
John Brown, Peter DiGangi, Walter Power, Abby Burns
Members Absent: Ted Sadoski
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the meeting in session at 7:30 P.M.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Abby Burns to approve the
minutes of April 6, 1978 as distributed to the members for advance reading.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
A motion was made by John Brown and seconded by Donald Hunt to approve the
minutes of May 4, 1978 as distributed to the members for advance reading.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Pickering Wharf
Bob Masse of Sign Works was present to present a comprehensive sign
package for Pickering Wharf to the Board. Planning Board Aide Michael Moniz
explained that when there is a "comprehensive sign package" there has to be
approval from the Planning Board as well as the Planning Department. Mr.
Masse began with signs #5 and #6 which are non-conforming signs. He explained
that the sign ordinance restricts the height of signs to 25 feet and that the
proposed signs to be placed on the two towers will be 31 feet 4 inches because
of the height of the towers. He further pointed out that the lettering on
the sketch of the sign is out of proportion and will be proportionately
smaller. Signs #5 and #6 will consist of white metal lettering on the brick
• towers.
He further explained that signs #1 and #2 will appear as follows with
Minutes of 5/25/78 Page 2
• a carved wooden ship in the middle:
Sign #3 is also like signs #1 and #2 and will be mounted between the old
garage and the adjacent building on Derby St. He pointed out that there will
be a minimum of 10 feet underneath which will place the sign in conformance
with the sign ordinance.
Mr. Masse also stated that Sign #4 will be a free standing sign and will
be a Directory for the project. He also explained that signs #7 and #8
will be hanging and attached to awnings and will conform to the height
established in the sign ordinance.
• After a brief discussion a motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded
by John Brown to approve the comprehensive sign package for Pickering Wharf
as presented by Mr. Robert Masse including the signs which do not conform to
the sign ordinance. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the
motion carried.
Storm Damage - Nondas Lagonakis
Michael Moniz explained to the Board that Mr. Lagonakis's property at
5 Bridge St, was damaged during the Feb. 6th storm. Michael also stated that
Mr. Lagonakis has now received $16,000 in federal assistance to repair the
damage. Michael stated that Mr. Lagonakis wants to shore up 80-90 feet of
his embankment using crushed stone. Michael stated that Mr. Lagonakis
was appearing before the Board in order to ascertain whether he needed a
Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit from the Board to do the necessary repair
work.
Michael informed the Board that the ConCom had voted at their last meeting
that the work proposed by Mr. Lagonaksi is not applicable to the Wetlands
Minutes of 5/25/78 Page 3
• Protection Act with the condition that the work does not involve filling
beyond the line of existing protective stone adjacent to the beach. Michael
also informed the Board that there is a 10 day appeal period connected with
the ConCom's determination and that there was some dumping of stone the day
after the Commission's decision. Mr. Lagonakis explained that the stone had
been dumped before he had notified the contractor of the 10 day waiting
period. He also explained that if permission could be obtained quickly for
this work he will be able to obtain free fill for the project. Mr. Lagonakis
stated that he just wanted to protect his property. Peter DiGangi questioned
what was there before the storm. Mr. Lagonakis explained that the embankment
consisted of small stones and cobblestone. Bill Wheaton questioned why Mr.
Lagonakis was not considering using large stones to shore up the embankment
which would offer more protection against future storms. Mr. Lagonakis
• explained that he didn't want to spend a lot of money because the property
might be taken in the future for the connector road.
Mr. Jean Paul Pelletier read to the Board the emergency storm damage
procedures that had been enacted by the State legislature. Michael Moniz
informed Mr. Pelletier that the time limit on that legislation had expired.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Donald Hunt that the
work proposed by Mr. Lagonakis at 5 Bridge St. does not require a Special Permit
from the Planning Board as long as the work does not involve filling beyond the
line of existing protective stone adjacent to the beach. The vote was
unanimous and the chairman declared the motion carried.
Planning Board Aide Report
Michael Moniz stated that as of now there has been two neighborhood
. meetings for the Collins Cove walkway improvement program. Michael further
stated that the first meeting was somewhat controversal with much discussion
on traffic and vandalism in the area. Michael stated that the preliminary
Meeting of 5/25/78 Page 4
• design had been presented at the second meeting and that it met with general
approval of those who attended the meeting. Michael informed the Board that
he was to meet with representatives from Haskel and Hall and Mass. Electric
relative to Haskel and Hall's parking lot before the next neighborhood
meeting. Michael stated that the final presentation was tentatively scheduled
for June 5th. Walter Power will be informed when the meeting is formally
scheduled. Don Hunt questioned SESD's easement in that area. Michael
replied that as long as the park is 20 feet away from the pipe, SESD has no
objections.
Michael informed the Board that there will be 3 Wetland/Flood Hazard
public hearings at the next Planning Board meeting. He stated that 2 of them
are for the repair of sea walls and that no negative comments had been received
from the commenting boards. The third special permit application involves
filling of land on Clark St. and reservations relevant to this proposed filling
have been expressed by the City Engineer, ConCom and Board of Health.
Michael also presented to the Board a list of requirements for the
construction of sea walls that have been adopted by the Conservation Commission.
He explained that if the Board also adopted these requirements it would add
more information for the Engineering Department to review. Michael pointed out
that the Planning Board, at this time, have not set guidelines for seawall
construction. Walter Power questioned if the Wetland/Flood Hazard zoning
ordinance allows for these proposed sea wall requirments. Michael stated
that the zoning calls for the plans to be stamped either by an architect
or an engineer.
John Brown noted that there is a growing belief that the Federal Flood
Insurance program may be "encouraging building" in areas that shouldn't be
• built upon. He stated that maybe this was an area that the Board should
get involved in. Walter Power stated that discussion of this issue would be
Meeting of 5/25/78 Page 5
• germane to Master Plan discussions relevant to the Harbor. Michael Moniz
pointed out that this controversy was more applicable to Rhode Island,
Maine and the South Shore of Mass. than to Salem. Walter Power requested
that Cheri Cooper make note of this issue for further discussion.
It was the consensus of the Board Members present that the sea wall
requirements of the ConCom be adopted by the Planning Board.
Michael next read a letter from Attorney Strom requesting that the Planning
Board release a lot located on the corner of Alba and Brentwood that is
currently being held by covenant by the Planning Board. Michael explained
that he has requested that the engineering department review this lot as well
as 6 additional lots also being held with regard to the covenant between
Salem Acres Inc. and the Planning Board. Walter Pwer noted that the letter
from the Engineering Department should deal with the specific points contained
in the covenant that was established with Salem Acres.
Michael noted that the lots held under covenant have houses on them. After
a brief discussion it was the consensus of the Board that they would take no
action to notify the home owners until the report has been prepared by the
Engineering Department and reviewed by the Planning Board.
Michael Moniz informed the Board that the owner of a house at 399
Jefferson Ave. , Mr. Jalbert, has requested that the Planning Board vote to
have the Board of Appeal reconsider their denial for his variance request.
Mr. Jalbert was present and explained to the Planning Board that he wishes to
convert the third floor at 399 Jefferson Ave to a one bedroom apartment for
his son. The building would then be a 3 family apartment building.
•
Minutes of 5/25/78 Page 6
•
Michael Moniz explained that parking had not been shown on the original
application and that since Mr. Jalbert can now supply plans showing parking,
that constitutes 'new information' which would enable the Board to request
that the Board of Appeal reconsider their decision. Michael also infomed
the Board that the plan shows enough space for 5 parking spaces in the back-
yard. Michael also noted that the building is in a Rl zone.
Walter Power read the letter that the Planning Board had sent to the
Board of Appeal which noted congestion in the neighborhood and parking as
items to be considered before granting this special permit. Don Hunt ques-
tioned whether Mr. Jalbert resided at 399 Jefferson Ave. Mr. Jalbert
replied that he didn't.
Michael Moniz informed the Board that in considering the specific make-
up of the neighborhood within 300 feet of Mr. Jalbert's property it was
508 single family, 37% 2 family and 12% 3 family.
John Brown suggested that the Board vote on this issue at their next
meeting since there has to be an affirmative vote of 8 Planning Board Members
for the Board of Appeal to reconsider and there were only 8 planning Board
members present at the meeting. Chairman Walter Power tabled further action
on this issue until the June lst meeting of the Board. Michael Moniz informed
the Board members that after a vote is taken the Board of Appeal should be
notified of the action.
Board of Appeal Agenda
The Board next reviewed the Board of Appeal Agenda for June 6, 1978. It
was the consensus of the members present that a letter should be written to
the Chairman of the Board of Appeal recommending that the petition of
• Chester Defanski be dinied. It was also the consensus of those present that
a letter should be written to the Chairman of the Board of Appeal stating
Minutes of 5/25/78 Page 7
• that although the Board agrees with the proposed usage outlined for 298§
302 Essex St. by Jacob Leven, the Board feels that before a variance is granted
the developer should work with the Planning Department so that the project
remains in line with the Heritage Plaza West study.
Planning Board Dinner
The Planning Board Dinner scheduled for 6:30 P.M. June 9, 1978 at the
Daniel's House was briefly discussed. Those attending should notify the Clerk
as to their menu choice.
Master Plan
Cheri Cooper next spoke to the Board relevant to the Environment element
of the Master Plan. She distributed to Board Members present copies of possible
policies, objectives and action strategies for the Natural Resources sub-
element. Cheri also stressed that it was important that Board members write
down their ideas for policies, objectives and action strategies for this as
well as future elements.
Bill Wheaton stated that in discussions he has had on the Environment
subcommittee report it was noted that it contained contradicting information
and that it was fragmentary in treatment. Walter Power pointed out that
the subcommittee report contained primarily action startegies.
Cheri Cooper explained that policies "should be distilled" and on them
will hang the action strategies. She further suggested that Board members
review the subcommittee report as well as the reports of the Planning
Department and Planning Board's relevant to Environment and check off the ones
that reflect their thinking and cross out the ones that don't. Walter Power
reiterated that input was needed from each board member if a successful
• Master Plan is to be arrived. at.
Minutes of 5/25/78 Page 8
Cheri then showed the members a publication put out by AIA entitled
"Open Space for People". She stated that this report is similar to what she
envisions for each study element. She pointed out that the maps in this pub-
lication ar 8" by 20 " which is also the size she would like for Salem's
Master Plan.
Confusion was expressed by various Board Members as to what exactly should
be included in their written reports on the Environment. Walter Power
explained the definitions for the different secitons of the elements as
follows:
Objective or Goal - ideal for which to strive
Policy - direction or course
• Action Strategy - Precedent for action
'Richard.Lutts stated that Ee'did not think the Board should involve itself
with action strategies. Walter Power agreed that the Board would be unable
to anticipate all the action strategies that could come out of the Master
Plan but the Board could include various action strategies that are apparent
now.
Dick Lutts further stated that pople's interest in the Master Plan will
'hinge' on the action strategies without paying attention to the different
goals and objecteves. John Brown disagreed by stating that "Policy" is what
the action strategy will come from and that policy will be the instrument to
arrive at action strategy.
Bill Wheaton stated that as far as the format of the Master Plan was
concerned, he thought there should be few goals since they were too broad to
• be useful. He also thought that there should only be a few action strategies
and fewer more specific policies than have been presented in the various
reports in the Master Plan.
Minutes of 5/25/78 Page 9
• John Brown stated that he thought that goals for the Master Plan
do need discussion since he thought that some of them goals suggested
by Cheri in her reporton Natural Resources warrant discussion. He
cited for example #3 on the list of goals outlined by Cheri which states:
"To minimize the negative impact of development on the City while rea-
lizing the beneficial impacts.
After some more discussion as to the format of the Environment
element it was decided that the goals, objectives and action strategies
of this element will be discussed at the next meeting.
A motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded by Paul S'Amour to
adjourn the meeting. The mote was unanimous and the Chairman declared
the motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
•
of "$nleiu, ��M$sttcl�u$etts
IU
,�sgl�ttltitt� uarl
" �°�� (One ig+ttlem preen
'�Dn`'0'� f�t#� j1{ �ZllPtll� �ttssttc�llsE##s
Planning 'Pearl
(One Ottlem preen
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
June 1, 1978
1. Wetland/Flood Hazard Public Hearings
a. Mr. James Michaud - 140 Bayview Ave.
b. Mrs. Helen Pauline Durflinger - 26 Hardy St.
c. Mr. Walter Abraham - Clark St.
2. Form A's
a. Peabody Museum
b. Salem Redevelopment Authority - George Vallis
3. Discussion of Conversion of YMCA Building - George Vallis
4. Election of Officers
5. Planning Board Aide Report - Michael Moniz
6. Planning Board Dinner
7. Correspondence and Communications
8. . Master Plan - The Environment
9. Adjourn
s,
Cty of 'S-intem, �fflnosac4usftts
(ane 0alrm (green
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD JUNE 1, 1978, 7:30 P.M. THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Donald Hunt, Paul D'Amour, Richard Lutts, William Wheaton,
John Brown, Peter DiGangi, Walter Power, Abby Burns,
Ted Sadoski
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the Wetlands/Flood Hazard
public hearing for Mr. James Michaud in session at 7:30 P.M.
The application for Mr. James Michaud of 140 Bayview Ave was first
considered by the Board. Mr. Michaud was present and explained that his
seawall had been severely damaged as a result of the Feb. 6th storm. He
then presented pictures of the damage to the Board. He further explained
that he was proposing to rebuild the wall at an elevation of 17 ft.
Chairman Walter Power noted that the commenting Boards and City Agencies
(Conservation Commission, City Engineer, Building Inspector, and Board of
Health) had all concurred with the proposal.
The attorney for James Michaud, Robert Ledoux, was present and explained
that his client was also submitting an application under the Wetlands Pro-
tection Act to the Conservation Commission. He explained that the specific
requirements for seawall construction established by the Conservation Com-
mission were established after Mr. Michaud had submitted his application and
'that additional informabion .is''being added to ',the ,plan by a Civil Engineer.
Since there were no additional comments the Chairman closed the public
hearing at 7:45 P.M.
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 2
' The Chairman declared a quorum present and the Wetlands/Flood Hazard
public hearing for Mrs. Helen Pauline Derflinger in session at 7:46 P.M.
Mr. Derflinger of 26 Hardy St. was present to explain the seawall
reconstruction work he is proposing at 26 Hardy St. He explained that he
wished to repair the Feb 6th storm damage to his seawall. He also noted that
reconstruction has to begin soon or his garage will collapse because of the
continuing erosion. He also noted that Donald Curran will be the contractor
for this project. In addition, he informed the Board that he has received
his Order of Conditions from the Conservation Commission. He finished by
stating that a crane will be used on the project and a temporary roadway
will be installed so that the crane can come in on the landward side of the
wall.
Chairman Walter Power noted that the commenting boards and city agencies
had all concurred with the proposal.
Since there were no additonal comments the Chairman closed the public
hearing at 7:55 P.M.
The Chairman declared a quorum present and the Wetlands/Flood Hazard
public hearing for Mr. Walter Abraham in session at 7:56 P.M.
The Board then considered the Wetlands/Flood Hazard application for
Mr. Walter Abraham for filling his property on Clark St. Mr.. Abraham was
present and explained that his land on Clark St. is partially in a wetland
and he was requesting a special permit from the Board so that he could fill
with 'clean fill,' . Mr. Abraham stated that he had no plans to build the
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 3
land but that he wishes to fill the land in order to sell it. He also stated
that the person owning the adjacent lot is filling and that his lot will
become a catch basin for additional runoff if he is not allowed to fill.
The area he had designated for filling includes an area approximately 40'
by 70' .
It was pointed out that the filling being done next to Mr. Abraham's
is being done outside of the Wetland area.
Mr. Frank D'Amato, an abutter of Mr. Abraham's land, questioned how long
it would take to fill this area and expressed concern that the area would turn
into a dump if the filling process took too long. Mr. Abraham didn't feel it
would take too long once the permit was received.
Pauline Alexander, also an abutter of the area, stated that she was
not against the proposed project, but she did state that she was concerned
about the water being diverted and causing flooding in the surrounding area.
Agnes George of 8 Clark St. pointed out that even if Mr. Abraham does
not plan to build, the person who purchases the land will, and that there are
numerous water problems in the area now without any new ones being added.
Pauline Alexander added that she would have fewer misgivings if Mr. Abraham
were going to live on this property.
Walter Abraham stated that the flow of the water from his property
would be going in the opposite direction from the abutters on Clark St.
Chairman Walter Power next read the review comments which have been
received from the commenting boards. Richard Swenson of the Engineering
Department stated that, "If your property is filled above the street grade,
the natural drainage for the area will be blocked and possibly cause flooding
of the street and adjacent land. Therefore, we would request a '15' foot
wide easement along the easterly property line to allow installation of a
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 4
storm drain in the future." Walter Power inquired if the requested easement
has been finalized. Michael Moniz replied that there was nothing in writting
at the present time. Walter Szszbinski of the Board of Health stated on his
comment sheet that the Board of Health could not concur with the proposal
"because as a house lot a subsurface sewerage system could not be installed
for approval since the potential leacheate would be subjected to the abutting
wetland area." The conservation Commission also stated that they could not
concur with the proposal because they are "in principle against the filling
of all upland wetlands because of the increased flooding in the lower water-
shed during periods of runoff with high tides." The Building Inspector
concurred with the proposal.
Since there were no additional comments, Chairman Walter Power closed the
public hearing- at 8:30 P.M.
Chairman Walter Power opened the regular meeting of the Planning Board at
8:32 P.M.
After a brief discussion a motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded
by John Brown that a Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit be issued to Mr.
James Michaud with respect to the reconstruction of a seawall on the pro-
perty located at 140 Bay View Ave, Salem, Mass. , as outlined in his application
which was received at the City Clerk's office on April 13, 1978. The vote
was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded by
Peter DiGangi that a Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit be issued to Mrs.
Helen Pauline Derflinger with respect to the reconstruction of a seawall on
the property located at 26 Hardy St. , Salem Mass. , as outlined in her appli-
cation which was received at the City Clerk's office do April 18, 1978. The
vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 5
After a brief review of Walter Abraham's Special Permit application it
was the consensus of the Board Members present that the filling of this
property would increase flooding conditions in the surrounding area. It
was also noted that the board received negative comments from the Conservation
Commission stating that the filling of this wet area would lessen the water
storage of the area and increase flooding. It was also noted that the
Board received negative comments from the Board of Health stating that the
area in question is not serviced by the City sewer and that there would
be an inadequate leaching area for a septic system.
A motion was then made by Richard Lutts and seconded by Abby Burns that
the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit application of Mr. Walter Abraham
with respect to the filling of Property located at 20 Clark St. be denied.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Form A's
Peabody Museum
Attorney Berkal, representing the Peabody Museum, was present to ex-
plain what was intended. Attorney Berkal explained that the reason for the
Form A's were to straighten the lot lines of the Museum's property. For
example, at this point part of Lolly's Shoe Store is located on property
owned by the museum. There were two Form A's submitted for the purpose of
straightening out the lot lines because part of the land involved is registered
and part is unregistered.
A motion was made by William Wheaton and seconded by Abby Burns to endorse
the Form A's as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control laws.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman delcared the motion carried.
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 6
' Election of Officers
After a brief discussion a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded
by Richard Lutts to nominate Walter Power III to the position of Chairman-
ship of the Planning Board. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman
declared the motion carried.
Planning Board Aide Report
Michael Moniz first reported that he has met with New England Power and
Haskell and Hall relevant to the Collins Cove study. He also noted that
there would be- another neighborhood meeting the evening of June 12, 1978 to
gather input on the final design for the area.
Relevant to the unreleased lots in the Witchcraft heights development,
Michael noted that a representative from the Engineering Department has
inspected the property and that after the lots are reinspected for water
meters a letter will be sent to the Planning Board from the Engineering
Department relevant to the advisability of releasing the lots in question.
A discussion next ensued as to how the lots in question could be sold before
they were formally released by the Planning Board. It was the consensus of
the Board that either the City Solicitor or the Asst. City Solicitor be
invited to the next Planning Board Meeting in order to discuss performance
guarantee.
Form A - Salem Revevelopment Authority -
Attorney George Vallis was present to explain what was intended. He
explained that the Salem Redevelopment Authority wishes to split Lot #2
which is presently on Liberty St. and sell it to Russell Kieran.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Ted Sadoski and seconded
by Paul D'Amour to endorse the Form A as not requiring approval under the
w
Subdivision Control Regulations.
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 7
' Discussion of Conversion of YMCA Building
Attorney Vallis was present to describe what was intended. Attorney
Vallis explained that the developer, Jack Levin, wishes to renovate the
rS_econd, third and fourth floors of the buildings. Attorney Vallis also
explained that the YMCA will be leasing 18 spaces in the parking lot next
to the buildings for the use of the' future apartment dwellers. Attorney Vallis
further explained that each proposed apartment will have at least one bedroom,
kitchen and living room. He also stated that the third and fourth floors
will be used as townhouses.
In reviewing the plans for these proposed .apartments, Bill Wheaton noted
that the second floor windows on the middle building are not original and
could easily be replaced with a three window pattern such as is found on
the third floor. Bill also suggested that the developer meet with the Plan-
ning Department relevant to these plans. It was the consensus of the Plan-
ning Board that they were not opposed to the issuance of a variance for the
renovation of the YMCA buildings and that a letter be sent to the developer
as well as the Planning Department stating this and requesting that the de-
veloper work with the Planning Department relevant to facade work and
possible funding there might be available for this facade work.
Master Plan - The Environment -
The Board next reviewed the goals, policies and action strategies for
the Environment element of the Master Plan.
Cheri Cooper suggested that the Board go through each report that had
been prepared by Board members, as well as the one she prepared. During the
ensuing discussion, it was noted that the wording of the reports has to
be worked on. For example, in some cases such as the Policy Statement,
Minutes of 6/1/78 Page 8
"To encourage the use of Salem Harbor and Collins Cove as a pleasure boat
anchorage and provide docking facilities for marine activities", it was
the consensus of the members that it was too specific. In other areas,
Board Members felt the policies were too broad or vague in wording. In
addition, several Board members objected to the setting of standards relevant
to noise, air and water quality as areas outside of their purview. It was
also stressed by John Brown that for the element to be effective an effort
should be made to prioritize the policies, goals and action strategies of
the Environment element.
Cheri Cooper is to incorporate the suggestions of the Board into
the draft for this element for the next planning board meeting. Board
members were asked to review "Notes on Master Plan for the City of Salem"
as written by John Brown.
A motion was made by'Abby Burns and seconded by Richard Lutts to adjourn
the meeting at 10:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
u ��D O �GLit 1 of $stent, �tt85�ICf�iiSP��B
;f
Wup .Oalrm (Arm
�� �; .mow - , � �Ia►utittg �narl
r
AGENDA
June 22, 1978
1. Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit Hearing
a. Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Hanlon - 60 Bay View Ave.
2. Approval of Minutes of May 25, 1978
3. Approval of Minutes of June 1, 1978
4. Form A - Mr. Saltz
5. William Tinti - Pickman Park
Loring Hills
Covenants
6. Planning Board Aide Report - Michael Moniz
7. Correspondance
8. Adjourn a
4"
s
11
Minutes of 6/22/78 Page 3
• Correspondance
A letter has been received by the Board from New England Power relevant
to questions raised at their Wetlands/Flood Hazard public hearing held April 20,
1978. In discussing the letter it was noted that the Board remains concerned
about the dust control methods New England Power proposes relevant to their
coal slurry project.
A letter has been received from the Board of Health relevant to water
testing that is being done at the Forest River Tidal Gate area.
Ted Sadoski suggested that Michael Moniz compile a notebook containing
procedural guidelines relevant to the Planning Board's responsibilities
(i.e. Form A, Wetland/Flood Hazard zoning)
Walter Power informed the board that the City Council had approved the
FY79 Planning Board Budget intact.
• Planning Board Aide Report
Michael explained that Nondas Iagonakis has filled his property at 5
Bridge St. beyond the line allowed by the Planning Board at their May 25th
meeting and outlined in a letter to Mr. Lagonakis on May 30th. He also noted
that Mr. Iagonakis was in violation of the Determination of Applicability
issued by the ConCom and that they have issued a Cease and desist to Mr.
Lagonakis.
City Solicitor Bill Tinti was present and stated that Mr. Lagonakis had
not obtained a Special Permit for the extensive filling that he has done and so
he is in violation of the Salon Zoning Ordinance. He also stated that Jack
Powers as the Zoning Enforcement Officer be contacted relevant to this
possible violation and that he report back any action he takes.
A motion was made by Donald Hunt and seconded by Abby Burns that a letter
be written to Jack Powers, Zoning Enforcement Officer, informing him that Nondas
NLinutes of 6/22/78 Page 4
•
Lagonakis may be in violation of Section VII, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts,
subsection 4, paragraph m of the Salem Zoning Ordinance relevant to work that
has been done on his property at 5 Bridge St. , Salem, Mass. The Planning
Board also requests that the Zoning Enforcement Officer investigate this sit-
uation and report the resulting action to the Planning Board within 14 days
as outlined in Section IX, subsection B of the Salem Zoning Ordinance.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Pickman Park
Bill Tinti explained that the covenant for Salem Acres covering per-
formance guarantees has been delivered to Attorney Beatrice and states that
"no lot will be built upon or sold until all public improvements are made."
Bill also explained that since the building in Pickman Park will be done in
• phases, the developer will came in at various stages requesting a release for
part of the land and at that time bank books would be offered as a performance
guarantee for the land released.
Bill Tinti also stated that Board members will be sent the brief con-
taining findings of fact and rulings of law that he sulmitted to Judge O'Leary
relevant to the Pickman Park court action.
Board members next discussed the protection offered by Performance
guarantees in view of the recent findings relevant to 7 lots in the Witchcraft
Heights subdivision. Bill Tinti explained that in the case of Witchcraft
Heights the covenant had been attached to the deeds at the Registry of Deeds
but that with these seven lots it had been overlooked in their title searches.
Ted Sadoski questioned whether the performance guarantee should be signed
• before the Board grants its approval to the subdivision. Bill Tinti replied
that the performance guarantee should be settled before the Board grants its
approval.
Minutes of 6/22/78 Page 5
•
Walter Power questioned how the covenant for Pickman Park was different
from the one for Witchcraft Heights. Bill Tinti stated that the covenants
were similar but that the Building Inspector could be informed of the
covenant so that Building Permits would not be issued prematurely.
Loring Hills
Relevant to Loring Hills, Attorney Tinti explained that a similar
covenant to Pickman Park's covering performance guantees has been sent to
the attorney for Loring Hills Developers Trust. Their attorney has stated
that it will be no problem to have the trustees of Loring Hills Developers
Trust sign this covenant.
The board next discussed the advisability of filing the signed covenants
relevant to Loring Hills Developers Trust at the Registry of Deeds. Bill
• Tinti pointed out that by recording the approved plan and the covenants they
would be binding on the present developers as well as their successors and
would eliminate the potential of "grandfathering". After further discussion
a motion was made by Donald Hunt and seconded by Ted Sadoski that the Loring
Hills Developers Trust Subdivision Plan consisting of three drawings, filed
by the developers on May 4, 1977 and revised on May 11, 1977, May 13, 1977,
June 23, .1977 and June 27, 1977 with the Planning Board of the City of Salem
entitled, "Loring Hills Subdivision - Salem, Mass. ," "Site Plan - Parce G-
Health Center," and "Housing for the Physically Impaired-Parce B-Salem, Mass-
achusetts," with the accompanying.conditions of approval, be recorded at
South Essex Registry of Deeds. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman
declared the motion carried.
•
• Minutes of 6/22/78 Page 6
• Clerk of Works
Bill Tinti explained that Board members have been given a rough draft
of a proposed ammendment to the Subdivision Regulations which would establish
a clerk of works to oversee the construction of subdivisions in order to
insure that conditions established by the Board are followed during construction.
Ted Sadoski stated that a public hearing would have to be held before an
amendment could be added to the Subdivision Regulations. After some dis-
cussion relative to the wording and intent of the proposed amendment, it was
the consensus of the Board members that the proposed amendment be more fully
discussed at the next Planning Board Meeting.
Planning Board Aide Report
Michael Moniz informed the Board that it has cane to his attention that
Messrs. Tassinari and Burba have recently installed utility storage tanks
at 10 White St. Michael pointed out that the Special Permit issued by the
Board to Messrs. Tassinari and Burba on July 21, 1977 expressly stated that
"no utility work, site work, paving, or any work except the above work on the
two buildings is approved." Michael further explained that Lt. Groggin
stopped further work because of a potential fire hazard. Michael also pointed
out that the tanks are located in the filled protion of the property and for
this reason it is difficult to determine the exact elevation of the land.
Michael also noted that it appears that Messrs. Tassinari and Burba are also
in violation of the Orders of Condition issued by the Conservation Commission -
relative to the location of the tanks.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded
by Dick Lutts that the Salon Zoning Enforcement Officer should be informed
• that Messrs. Tassinari and Burba may be in violation of Section VII, Wetlands
Nimutes of 6/22/78 Page 7
and Flood Hazard Districts, subsection 4 paragraph c of the Salem Zoning
• Ordinance relevant to work that has been done at their property at 10 White
St. In addition , the Planning Board is requesting the Zoning Enforcement
Officer investigate this situation and report the resulting action to the
Planning Board within 14 days as outlined in Section IX, subsection B of the
Salem Zoning Ordinance. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared
the motion carried.
witchcraft Heights
A letter has been received from the Engineering Department stating that
all the areas covered in the covenants with Salon Acres relevant to Witch-
craft Heights have been covered.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Richard Lutts to
release in full Lots 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 297, and 298 as shown on a
• plan recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds, Plan Book 114
Plan 88, frau the force and effect of the conditions set forth in the covenant
between Salem Acres, Inc. and the Planning Board dated July 24, 1969 and
recorded with said Registry of Deeds in Book 5628, page 107. The vote
was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
It was the consensus of the Board that a letter outlining the Board's
action relevant to the release of the covenant for Withchcraft Heights be
sent to Att. Beatrice as well as the homeowners of the lots in question.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
Ctp of �.Strletit, 'Ahesadjusetts
• �" � �I�cIlltlitt$ �llarl
'� ctwat Mur 0alem (Areett
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD JULY 6, 1978, 7:30 P.M. , THIRD FLOOR
CONFERNCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members present: Donald Hunt, Paul D'Amour, Ted Sadoski, Richard Lutts,
Walter Power, John Brown, Peter DiGangi
Members Absent: William Wheaton, Abby Burns
Chairman Walter Power opened the meeting with a quorum present at
7:30 P.M.
Mr. Nondas Lagonakis was present to discuss the letter he has re-
ceived from the Zoning Enforcement Officer dated June 30, 1978. The
letter from the Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the filling that
• had been done at the property at 5 Bridge St. "was more extensive than
what was allowed by the Planning Board" and that Mr. Lagonakis was in
violation of Section VIII of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning
Enforcement Officer also stated that, Mr. Lagonakis is now requested to
correct this violation by removing the additional fill to the line of
the original embankment by July 31, 1978 or risk legal action. Planning
Board members Donald Hunt and Paul D'Amour have inspected this property.
Mr. Lagonakis stated that all he wanted to do is to protect his
property. He also stated that after the Conservation Commission inspected
the work he had done he was surprised when they issued a cease and desist
the following day. He also stated that he had called Essex survey and that
they had informed him that the extent of the fill "was almost to his line."
Walter Power questioned what line Mr. Lagonakis was referring to and Mr.
Lagonakis replied "the bottom line of my property." Walter then explained
that the location of his property line was not relevant since Mr.
Minutes of 7/6/78 Page 2
• Lagonakis had been given permission to repair storm damage, not extend his
fill line.
Mr. Lagonakis then explained that he was attending a funeral in Wor-
cester when the fill was placed and that he didn't know how much fill
was placed until he came back. Mr. Jean Paul Pelletier, the supplier
of the fill, stated that given a little time, the fill would settle back
to the proper line. Walter Power again stated that Messrs.. Lagonakis and
Pelletier were referring to the property line, while the Planning Board
was referring to the original embankment line.
Discussion next followed as to the possible courses of action available
to resolve this situation. Ted Sadoski stated that Mr. Lagonakis could
be called upon to file for a Special Permit for the work already done.
He pointed out, however, that Mr. Lagonakis also has to work out his
• differences with the Conservation Commission. Michael Moniz of the
Planning Department stated that the ConCom in their cease and desist
stated that the illegal fill should be removed and then a Notice of
Intent filed with the Commission. Michael also pointed out that there were
two ordinances that Mr. Lagonakis was in violation of. One was the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and the other the Wetlands Protection Act which is part of
the state statute.
John Brown stated that if it was Mr. Lagonakis' intention to remove
the fill back to the line of the original embankment then he felt that
Mr. Lagonakis should not be made to apply for a Special Permit. Mr.
Lagonakis stated that he was willing to remove the fill to the line of the
embankment as it existed before the Feb. .storm.
•
Minutes of 7/6/78 Page 3
• Michael Moniz also pointed out that the Planning Board could re-
quest an extension. from the Zoning Enforcement Officer relevant to the
deadlines he established in his letter of June 30, 1978.
Discussion next followed relevant to who would be responsible for
establishing the original fill line. Peter DiGangi suggested that the
Conservation Commission could do this. Michael Moniz stated that he has
spoken to Alan Randall of the Army Corps of Engineers who has done a
survey of the area and he estimates that Mr. Lagonakis appears to be 5
or 10 fet beyond the previous embankment. Michael noted that Mr. Randall
will forward the final report to him. Bill Farrell of Constituent Services
questioned whether the Army Corps of Engineers could then establish the
original line of the embankment.
Mr. Farrell also asked that since Mr. Lagonakis had shown good faith
• by coming before the Board and agreeing to the removal of the fill to the
line of the origianl embankment could the Planning Board request an
extension to complete the work.
After some further discussion, a motion was made by John Brown and
seconded by Peter DiGangi to request the Zoning Enforcement Officer to
grant an extension to Sept. 1, 1978 for Mr. Lagonakis to correct his
zoning violation. This extension is being requested with the following
two conditions:
1. The violation is corrected by removing the additional fill to the line
of the original embankment as it existed prior to the February 6th
storm. The exact location of this line will be determined by a coopera-
tive effort between the Army Corps of Engineers and the Salem Con
• Com.
Minutes of 7/6/78 Page 4
• 2. That Mr. Lagonakis meet with the Conservation Commission relevant to
their requirements under the Wetlands Protection Act. This will
include filing a Notice of Intent with the Conservation Commission.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Mr. Lagonakis was also given a Notice of Intent form as well as
the instructions as to how it is to be filled out in order for Mr. Lagonakis
to fulfill his obligations relevant.:to the ConCom.
Planning Board Aide Report
Michael Moniz reported that Salem Acres, Inc. has filed their applica-
tion for a Wetlands Special Permit relevant to Pickman Park and that he
has distributed the comment sheets to the ConCom, Building Inspector, City
Engineer and Board of Health. Relevant to the filing o
Relevant to the filing of' the' signed covenants for Loring Hills
• Developers Trust, Michael informed the Board that it has been discovered
that there are two trustees in addition to Messrs. Brettman and Quigley
and that all the covenants as well as the performance guarantee will have
to be signed by all four trustees before they can be filed with the deed.
Discussion was next held relevant to Messrs Tassinari and Burba and
their zoning violation at White St. Marina. The Board reviewed the letter
that was sent to Messrs Tassinari and Burba from Jack Powers, the Zoning
Enforcement Officer, informing the developers that they are in violation
of the City's Wetland/Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance.
Michael informed' the Board that he' will be meeting with Attorney
Donalson who is representing the developers to discuss the zoning
infractions. Michael further stated that there were 3 areas of possible
• zoning violations:
Minutes of 7/6/78 Page 5
•
1. A pump house which houses the control valves has been errected on filled
land.
2. The location of the fuel storage tanks which are located 90 feet from
where they had obtained authorization from the ConCom to place them.
There are three 4,000 gallon tanks.
3. The start of some new bulkhead construction next to the travel lift.
Michael then asked the Board's opinion as to what should be discussed
and requested when he speaks to the developer's attorney. Ted Sadoski
stated that he should be guided by the letter from the Building Inspector's
office. Michael stated that since some permits were issued to the developers
before the creation of the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance, it
is not completely clear what permits would be required for the work they
• are doing. Peter DiGangi stated that there could be a question of
grandfathering for some of the work that has been done. Ted Sadoski
suggested that Michael speak with the City Engineer and ask him what is
needed as far as engineering requirements for the tanks. It was also
suggested that Bill Tinti be consulted relevant to any possible grandfathering.
Michael then stated that the July 14th deadline established by Jack
Powers will be too tight a time constraint since he is meeting with the
developers attorney for the first time tommorrow.
A motion was made by Don Hunt and seconded by Richard Lutts to re-
quest the Zoning Enforcement Officer to grant an extension to July 31, 1978
for Messrs. Tassinari and Burba to submit the necessary application and
required information relevant to their zoning violation at 10 White St.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
•
Minutes of 7/6/78 Page 6
Michael informed the Board that Mr. Robert Yates of 53 Osgood St.
wishes to correct the damage to his wooden seawall from theFeb. storm.
Specifically he wishes to:
1. Remove rotting boards on the face of the wall and replace as needed.
2. Place some large stones 1-2' high on ocean side for wave action dis-
pursion.
3. Dig trench on land side of fence and replace dirt with sizeable stones
to prevent washout.
After a brief discussion it was the consensus of the Board that Mr.
Yeats not be required to apply for a Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit
in order to repair his seawall. Michael is to verbally inform Mr. Yates
of the Board's consensus.
. Master Plan
Cheri briefly reviewed what a Master Plan is. She stressed that it is
a comprehensive plan to be used by all City Boards and departments as a
guide for the future. It is to provide short range as well as long range
guidelines for the direction of the City.
John Brown questioned why it is called a Community Development Master
Plan. Cheri answered that it was called this because of the source of
funding for the Master Plan.
Cheri then presented Board Members with the following subsections
of the Environment element of the Master Plan: air, noise and energy.
SShe noted that the inclusion of these is a requirement by various Federal
legislation (i.e. Air - governed by Clean Air Act in 1969) .
• . Minutes of 7/6/78 Page 7
• Cheri informed the Board that the rest of the subsections for the
Environment element will be submitted by the next meeting.
Cheri emphasized that discussion of other elements of the Master
Plan would have to begin soon and that she would like to begin discussion
of the Economy Element at the next meeting.
Discussion next followed as to the format.Cheri has used for the sub-
sections that have been completed. It was noted that it was a draft and
that the Board will be able to fully discuss its content at their next
meeting.
Cheri• also noted that subcommittees may not be needed,or used only
in a abbreviated form for the remaining elements of the Master Plan.
Cheri also stressed that additional corrections can be made as other
• elements are drafted. She pointed out that policies agreed upon for some
elements could change policies previously established for other elements.
Walter Power noted that he has spoken to Alan Taubert of the Peabody
Planning Board and that Sept. 14th is being considered for a joint meeting
to discuss the connector road. Walter will write a letter to Greg Senko
requesting information as to the City's policy relevant to the
connector road.
Clerk of the Works
The Board next considered the draft of the Clerk of the works ammendment
to the subdivision regulations. Ted Sadoski noted that the draft calls for
the Planning Board and City Engineer to be involved in securing the Clerk
of the Works for projects. He pointed out that this might be quite time
consuming. Ted also questioned where the funds would come from to pay the
• Clerk of the Works.
Minutes of 7/6/78
Page 8
•
M ichael explained that he had gone over this draft with the City
Engineer and that Mr: Fletcher felt that the City would have more control
over the Clerk of the Works if he were selected by the City and received
his salary from the City. The developer would be billedby the City each
month for the salary of the Clerk of the Works. Michael also noted that
the City Engineer had stated that he would be able to pay the Clerk of
the Works and then be reimbursed by the Developer.
Various working changes were discussed for the proposed ammendment
and Board members will receive a reworded ammendment for them to discuss
at their meeting of Aug. 3, 1978. Also at the Aug. 3rd meeting will be
a discussion of possibly ammending the section of the Subdivision Regulations
relevant to performance guarantees.
• A motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by Paul D'Amour to
adjourn the meeting at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
Ti#u of �.5� letii, �Mss�zcl�use##
w 3 VlalutiuS �90ar1
(due OnlPm (6reeu
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD JULY 20;,, 1978, 7:30 P.M. THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Paul D'Amour, Peter DiGangi, William Wheaton, Richard Lutts
Walter Power
Members Absent: Donald Hunt, Ted Sadoski, Abby Burns, John Brown
Chairman Walter Power opened the regular meeting of the Planning Board
with a quorum present at 7:45 P.M.
Wetland Flood Hazard Special Permit Application
Planning Board Aide Michael Moniz reported on this findings on questions
raised during the Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit Public Hearing for Mr.
• Thomas Hanlon which was held on June 22, 1978. Michael explained that at
the time of the public hearing questions were raised concerning the thickness
of the proposed wall as well as the height of the wall as it could affect boating
safety. Michael stated that the City Engineer has reviewed the plans and he
judges the wall to be adequate. Michael also stated that in speaking to Alan
Randall from the Army Corps of Engineers he was informed that since the
project is basically one of reconstruction the corps is not involved. Michael
added that the proposed reconstructed wall will be about 2 feet above the tide
level.
Michael went on to say that at the public hearing, concern was also
expressed relevant to how far out the wall will go. Michael stated that
in speaking to the contractor for the project, Mr. Curren stated that the
40 ft. includes the existing wall and is not measured from the land.
Minutes of 7/20/78 Page 2
• Paul D'Amour suggested that a pole be placed on top of the wall to
insure safety during a flood tide. Mr. Curren stated that -there would be
no problem in placing a pole on the wall.
After a brief discusssion, a motion was made by Peter DiGangi and
seconded by Richard Lutts to approve the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special
Permit application of Mr. Donald Curren with respect to the reconstruction
of a breakwater on the property located at 60 Bay View Ave as complying
with the requirements for the issuance of the permit, on the condition
the breakwater is constructed according to plans drawn by Donald Curran,
approved by Vartan T. Mooradian, Registered Engineer, and that a permanent
marker, with a minimum height of 3 feet above the top of the breakwater,
be placed on the seaward end of the breakwater.
• Planning Board Aide Report
Michael explained that Mr. Yeats has requested a letter from the Planning
Board stating that the reconstruction of his wooden seawall does not require
the filing of an application for a Special Permit under the Wetlands/Flood
Hazard zoning ordinance.
After a brief discusssion it was the consensus of the Board that
the work proposed by Mr. Robert Yates of 53 Osgood St. does not require
the filing of an application for a Special Permit under the Wetlands/
Flood Hazard Ordinance; provided that the work be limited to the following:
1. only the removal and replacement of rotting boards on the seawall is
permitted.
2. Some large stones may be placed on the ocian side for wave disruption;
3. A trench may be created on the landward side of the wall and filled with
• sizeable stones to prevent washout.
Michael Moniz will write this letter.
Minutes of 7/20/78 Page 3
•
Michael also reported that the ConCom will be viewing the staking that is
being done in the wetland sections of the proposed Pickman Park Cluster
Residential Development on Thurs, July 27, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. Michael will be
there for the viewing. Interested Board Members were also invited to attend.
Michael also informed the Board that the ConCom and a representative
from the Army Corps of Engineers will be viewing the filling violation of
Mr. Lagonakis at 5 Bridge St. at 7:30 P.M. on July 31, 1978 Board members
were invited to attend.
�kileer Wharf Marina
Michael Moniz reviewed for the Board the history of the various permits
presently held by Messrs. Tassinari and Burba relevant to Miller Wharf Marina.
Relevant to the bulkhead, Michael stated that in Feb. 1976 the developers received
• an Order of Conditions from the ConCom for "fill to be contained by graded rubble
mound dike". In Jan. 1977 a license was received for the DEQE for a "stone
dike". In Feb. 1977 an Army Corp of Engineer permit was obtained for "fill,
dredging and stone bulkhead". Michael stated that it appeared that the
developers have the necessary permits for the bulkhead although the
Conservation Commission's Order of Conditions are only valid for a year and at
this time the developers have not asked for, or received, an extension.
Michael stressed that it was imperitive that the work on the bulkhead be
completed in order to prevent washing out or storm damage to the filled area
and to protect the three 4,000 gallon tanks located in the filled area. He
stated that the bulkhead is 2/3's completed. Mr. Tassinari estimated that
it would take three weeks to complete the bulkhead.
•
Minutes of 7/20/78 Page 4
• Relevant to the fuel storage tanks, Michael stated that they were pre-
sented located in the filled area and that in the Order of Conditions
issued by the ConCom in 1976 it was stated that "all fuel storage tanks
are to be located inland on the site near to the end of White St." In
Jan. 1977 the developers received a license from the DEQE stating "Gas
and fuel lines may be placed and maintained extending in a southerly
direction through said fill area." In addition the plan for this
license shows the tanks at the end of White St. In Feb 1977 a permit was
obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers for "floating docks, gas and
service dock." Michael reported that in speaking to Alan Randall of the Army
Corps of Engineers he was informed that the corps considers the inland
location of the tanks only as a secondary issue in reviewing permits except
• in cases where the tanks will be located within the high water mark. Michael
went on to state that on April 14, 1978 a decision was made by Lt. Groggin
and Paul Caron of North Shore Oil Company to move the tank location to the
filled area. On June 12, 1978 a permit was obtained by the developers to install
the tanks in the filled area. MIchael summarized the concern relevant to the
fuel storage tanks is that they are properly anchored as to meet the Mass.
State Bldg. Code Flood Proofing requirements and are adequately protected
from being washed out.
Mr. Tassinari added that the location of the fuel storage tanks had been
changed to insure safe access by oil tankers. He pointed out that the original
site for the fuel storage tanks already has gas and water lines located there
and that it would have been impossible to place the tanks there.
Walter Power pointed out that other people have submitted Special Permit
• applications complete with calculations substantiating the anchoring of
tanks and that he felt a public hearing would have to be held relevant to these
tanks. He also pointed out that meeting the standards of the Wetlands/
Minutes of 7/20/78 Page 5
• Flood Hazard zoning ordinance would also help the developers in obtaining
Flood Insurance.
Michael then stated that as far as the pump house and gas pumps were
concerned, no permits have been obtained for construction or for dispensing
fuel. Michael explained that the pump house contains the control valves. He
pointed out that the floor elevation of the pump house was below the elevation
established for the 100 yr. storm and that the pump house is not anchored.
Michael summarized this issue by stating that there was a potential of
flooding of a building contianing electrical circuits. MIchael further
pointed out that the gas pumps are located 8'5" from the property line and
that the pump house is located 5'10" from the property line. Since the
minimum set back requirement is 10 feet for buildings and accessory buildings,
• the developers also appear to need a variance Lfrom the-.Board of Appeals.
The attorney for the developers, Attorney Donaldson, explained that his clients
have a purchase and sales agreement to obtain the land abutting the pump house and
gas tanks. If this additional land is purchased than the setback requirements
will be met.
Walter Power pointed out that the pump house is within five feet of the
fuel pumps. Mr. Tassinare stated that no gas was being dispensed there.
Mr. Tassinari also stated that there were also plans for hardtopping. '
Walter advised that when the developers submit their Special Permit Application
they include as many of their plans for future work as is possible.
After some further discussion, a motion was made by Richard Lutts and
seconded by Peter DiGangi to request that the Zoning Enforcement Officer
extend the deadline for Messrs. Tassinari and Burba to September 1, 1978.
• This extension will give messrs. Tassinari and Burba adequate time to submit
an application for a flood hazard special permit application for:
Minutes of 7/20/78 Page 6
• 1. The installation of three 4,000 gallon feel tanks ina filled area in
a V3 flood zone.
2. The construction of a pump house
3. Any other work that will be applicable to the wetlands and flood hazard
ordinance.
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Peter DiGangi to
approve the minutes of June 22, 1978 as written. The vote was unanimous
and the chairman declared the motion carried.
Master Plan
Cheri Cooper informed the Board that the draft for the Environment element is
completed except for the water, open space and recreation sections. She further
• explained that the environment element has sections such as "Statement of
Participation" and written comments included in the summary in order to fulfill
the requirements for the update for the ConCom's "Conservation, Open Space and
Recreation Plan" which is needed in order for the city to continue to
qualify for BOR funding. Cheri stressed that only one month could be used
for each of the remaining elements since funding for the Master Plan ends in
February. It was the consensus of the Board members present that a work
session for the Master Plan be scheduled before the next regular Planning
Board meeting. Michael will check with members as to what day it will be.
Cheri also stated that the Private Sector element will be discussed at
the next Planning Board Meeting. She asked that members write down their
ideas relevant to problem areas as well as possible goals, action strategies
and objectives.
•
Minutes of 7/20/78 Page 7
• Relevant to the environment element there was discussion as to the wording
of the texts. Walter Power felt that in some sections, such as the Energy section, too
much of the text did not deal specifically with Salem (i.e. the discussion of
Boston Gas in the Energy Section) . Walter also questioned some text which
were really action strategies (i.e. the last 2 paragraphs in the 'air'
subsection which deal with monitoring.)
Bill Wheaton pointed out that a decision would have to be made as to
the writing style of the Master Plan. He stated that some of the phrases
objected to by Walter are objections to the style of writing and not to
the content and direction of the element-itself. Bill stated that the
Master Plan could be a very 'readable' master plan or the content could
be presented in a more 'dry' manner. Walter stated that the Master Plan
could be a readable document and still have a lot of the redundency
• eliminated.
Paul D'Amour noted that the statement "and there has never been an
accident on the site." relevant to the LNG storage tank on Pierce Ave.
is not true. He also stated that he found most of the text informative
and interesting.
A suggestion was made that some noise level information relevant to
motorcycles would also be pertinent.
Bill Wheaton noted that the graphics relevant to "shading techniques" are
not as pertinent to Salem as they would be to other parts of the country.
Cheri will incorporate the suggested revisions for the next meeting.
A motion was made by Dick Lutts and Seconded by Paul D'amour to adjourn
the meeting at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
b�•C�!Y�'n -
ii \\\ \ LIT it of �71ent, ���M85MCjT1I5E�f5
;; \.`_ J•"? 1platutins )BOarl
(hp 4-5, c3lPul (Swu
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
AUGUST 3, 1978
1. Approval of minutes of July 6, 1978
2. Form A's
a. Mr. Doucette - 103 Bridge St.
b. Pickering Wharf
3. Planning Board Aide Report
4. Master Plan
of $ateni, Ansac4use##s
�� �w '-� 9 �latutittg �uarl
(ane 0alem preen
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD AUGUST 3, 1978, 7:30 P.M.
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: William Wheaton, Paul D'Amour, Donald Hunt, John Brown
Ted Sadoski, Walter Power
Members Absent: Abby Burns, Peter DiGangi, Richard Lutts
Chairman Walter Power called the meeting to order with a quorum present
at 7:36 P.M.
Form A
The Form A of Emily Doucette relevant to land located at 103 and 105
Bridge St. , Salem, Mass. was discussed. The parcels of land are located
• in a B1 zone and by combining the two parcels it will bring the lot into
conformance with the current zoning requirements. Planning Board Aide, Michael
Moniz stated that all the requirements for a Form A were met. After a
brief discussion a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Donald Hunt
to endorse the Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control
Laws. The vote was unanimous and the chairman declared the motion carried.
Planning Board Aide Report
Michael Moniz informed the Board that the Building Inspector has stated that
he is running out of copies of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and Jack would
like to know if the Board would be willing to finance a second printing of
the Zoning Ordinance. It was the consensus of the Board members present
that the Planning Board is not financially responsible for additional printing
of the Zoning Ordinance.
Minutes of 8/3/78 Page 2
• Michael next informed the Board that Salem has been invited to apply
for a grant from surplus funds through the Federal CZM fund. The grant
application is for $30,000 and would entail the funding of site analysis,
schematic designs and construction cost estimates for the park and
recreation area and the seaside walkway for the South River Waterfront
project which is a proposed six acre park and recreation area. If this
grant is received it can be used as 'seed' money for a grant application
to BOR for implementation of the project.
Michael explained that the 1.9 million received as the UDAG grant is
expected to cover primarily the housing rehabilitation portion of the
original grant proposal and because of this, funding from BOR will be needed for
implementation of the park. Michael also pointed out that BOR will not pro-
vide funding for the proposed marina and that additional UDAG money will be
• sought for implementation of the marina portion of the plan .
Michael further stated that another grant application to the State
CZM program for funding has also been submitted for the same project. Michael
informed the Board that the Planning Department is requesting a letter of
endorsement from the Board relevant to this grant proposal. After a brief
discussion a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Ted Sadoski to
endorse the grant application to the State CZM program submitted by the Planning
Department for the South River Waterfront Project. The vote was unanimous
and the chairman declared the motion carried.
Michael informed the Board that the ConCom will be inspecting the staking
of the proposed road at the Pickman Park subdivision on the evening of
August 10, 1978. Planning Board members were invited to attend.
•
.A
Minutes of 8/3/78 Page 3
• The members were also invited to attend the site inspection at Bill &
Bob's Roast Beef on August 14, 1978. The Conservation Commission will also
be there. ,
Michael further informed the Board that he has received a letter from
the ConCom requesting that the Board discuss the possible applicability of
the Wetlands/Flood Hazard zoning relevant to the closing of the Forest
River Tidal Gates. Bill Wheaton pointed out that there is no construction
associated with this project and that it only entails the operation of a
wheel. Bill stated that because of this the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Zoning is
not applicable. It was the consensus of the board members present that
operating the Tidal Gates in the Forest River area is out of their purvue
relevant to the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Zoning.
• Master Plan
Cheri Cooper informed the Board that she has received a letter from the
Chamber of Commerce stating that they are against any further construction
of housing in the downtown area that would further eliminate parking. Bill
Wheaton stated that the transportation study prepared by Mr. Voorhees states that ::.. ..
there is more than enough parking in the downtown area. John Brown stated that
if the businessmen perceive a problem than their views should be addressed.
Cheri stated that there will be a public meeting on August 15, 1978
chaired by the City Council to present the transportation study completed
by Alan Voorhees and Assoc. , Inc. Planning Board Members were invited to
attend:
•
:f
Minutes of 8/3/78 Page 4
Discussion was next held on the Private Sector Economy element of
the Master Plan. In reviewing the draft of Private Sector Economy, Cheri
stated that "employment has decreased in all types of manufacturing."
Bill Wheaton disagreed and stated that if statistics from 1965-1970
were used, it would probably indicate just the opposite. Cheri pointed
out that Salem is loosing their leather Industry because with the Clean
[dater Act, it is cheaper for the industry to relocate somewhere else than
to adapt their present structures.
Cheri also stated that some manufacturers have expressed interest in
expanding but lack the room to do it in. Cheri pointed out that there was
a need for an Industrial Park with the North River as a possible site for
such a park. Other possibilities for a site include Canal St and the
• vacant leather factories.
Cheri also pointed out that the Health projession is the largest
employer in Salem and Sylvania the largest Industrial employer.
She then went through the major strees and their present makeup
as well as some recommendations for future direction. For example Highland
Ave. is presently competing with the downtown area. One suggestion to alleviate
this would be to rezone the area requiring larger lot size.
In discussing the Planning Department Review there was disagreement as
to whether "Commercial rail" and "no small service airport" should be included
under disadvantages.
In discussing overall goals it was the consensus of the members that they
were not in favor of expanding the population, but in upgrading the quality
of employment with stable, high skilled manufacturing.
•
Minutes of 8/3/78 Page 5
•
The Board next discussed the Salem Willows area and the possibilities
it offers. Further discussion will be held at the next meeting, but there
was a consensus that the Willows not be encouraged in its current direction.
Form A
A Form A was submitted from Heritage Trust II relevant to the Pickering
Wharf area. There was no representative from Heritage Trust II present
to explain what. was intended. It was the consensus of the Board to
delay a decision on this Form A until the special meeting to be held on
Monday , September 7, 1978 at 7:30 P.M.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by John Brown to
adjourn the meeting at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfull submitted,
•
Ctu of ��lerrr, �Ettflsac4usrfts
• � � .� F �latntit[g '�Quarl
Onp Oalp U GLPftt
AGENDA
AUGUST 17, 1978
1. Minutes of July 20, 1978
Motion Second
2. Wetlands Hearings
a. Andrew Ginkus
b. George Kastrinakis
3. Connector Road - Jim Scanlon
4. Planning Board Aide Report - Michael Moniz
5. Master Plan - Cheri Cooper
•
•
w s Planning �Buarb
One Onlem &rrn
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD AUGUST 17,1978, 7:30 P.M. , THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members present: Walter Power, Paul D'Amour, Peter DiGangi, Richard Lutts,
John Brown, Ted Sadoski, William Wheaton
Members Absent: Abby Burns, Donald Hunt
Chairman Walter Power opened the Wetlands/Flood Hazard public hearing
at 7:30 P.M. for Andrew Ginkus of 16 Glover St. Planning Board Aide Michael
Moniz was present to explain what was intended. He explained that because of
the February Storm, their seawall at 16 Glover St. was badly damaged. In
reading the comments from the commenting boards, Michael noted that in the
. Order of Conditions issued by the ConCom the following conditions were
stipulated:
1. The new wall shall not extend beyond the line of the previously existing
wall.
2. Stability calculations and elevation of the top of the wall shall be
submitted to the ConCom prior to the start of construction.
The Board of Health concurs with the proposal. Their only concern is that
there is no stagnate water trapped behind the wall. Both the City Engineer
and the Building Inspector concurred with the proposal without comments.
Ken Bouffard of NorthEast Engineering stated that the elevation of the
proposed seawall will be 14 feet mlw. He noted that an elevation of 15.36
feet mlw was the recommended elevation in the Zoning Ordinance, but if this
particular wall is at an elevation of 15. 36 feet mlw then there will be drainage
• problems that the Board of Health has expressed concern about.
Mrs. Ginkus stated that the condition of the wall is so dangerous
Minutes of 8/17/78 Page 2
that there is a great danger of flooding right now.
Rose Pekin of 19 Willow Ave. stated "that something should be done, and
done soon."
After some further discussion, a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and
seconded by Peter DiGangi that a Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit
be issued to Mr. Andrew Ginkus of 16 Glover St. relevant to seawall re-
construction. This special permit will be issued with the condition that
stability calculations are received by the ConCom. The vote was unanimous
and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
The Chairman closed the public hearing at 7:45 P.M.
The Chairman opened the Wetlands/Flood Hazard public hearing for Mr.
George Kastrinakis at 7:50 P.M. Michael read the comments from the commenting
boards. The Building Inspector concurred without comment. The City Engineer
• concurred with the proposal but requested an easement for a 20" water line.
The Conservation Commission noted that they needed more information. They
noted the following four areas of concern:
1. Elevations should be shown.
2. Is this a rubble wall or a stone and mortar wall?
3. The wall should preferably have a footing.
4. The Commission always requires a stability calculation to demonstrate
that the wall will withstand the loading.
The Board of Health in their comments noted that there is an old existing
floor surface drain from the restraurant which goes out in the sea in direct line
where the proposed seawall is to be constructed. Michael advised that a letter
has been written to the Plumbing Inspector informing him of this drain. A
• reply has been received from the Plumbing Inspector stating that the pipe is not
Minutes of 8/17/78 Page 3
• used for a waste for the restaurant and possibly it could be used if necessary
by the restaurant as a drain to rid the basement of any ground water."
Richard Mailhoit, in responding to the ConCom's comments stated that he
will be submitting stability calculations to the ConCom. He also stated that
the proposed wall is a placed riprap wall which the present soil will serve as the
footing.
Mr. Kastrinakis stated that the drain in question is 49 years old and
that the ice machine is the only thing attached to it. Mr. Kastrinakis also
stated that he has plans to do the kitchen over and when this is done the ice
machine will be moved.
Bill Wheaton stated that the pipe is not in the Planning Board's purvue
and that the Board's authority lies with the wall.
After some further discussion a motion was made by William Wheaton and
• seconded by Richard Lutts to grant a special permit to George Kastrinakis for
construction of a seawall at 3 Bridge St. with the condition that the ConCom
is satisfied with the stability calculations that are submitted. The vote was
unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
The Chairman closed the public hearing at 8:07 P.M.
The Chairman opened the regular meeting of the Planning Board at 8:08 P.M.
There was a brief discussion relevant to receiving engineering comments from
both the ConCom and the City Engineer. It was the consensus of the members present
that a letter be sent to the City Engineer with a copy to the ConCom that the Board
will be looking to the Engineering Department for engineering comments relative
to Special Permit applications.
A motion was made by Ted Sadoski and seconded by Richard Lutts to approve
the minutes of July 20, 1978 as written. The vote was unanimous and the
• chairman declared the motion carried.
Minutes of 8/17/78 Page 4
• Jim Scanlon next spoke to the Board relative to the Connector Road.
Jim stated that the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is available for
inspection if any Board members wish to see them. Jim then proceeded to
trace the route of the proposed connector road that he had included in
the Fact Sheet he distributed to the members.
Jim stated that in 1972 the Mass. DPW had asked that the EIS be prepared
in two volumes. In 1975 there were public hearings on the EIS. After this:
the project was officially accepted by the Mass DPW. When the final draft of
the EIS went to Washington D.C. , they were informed that they wanted the EIS
in one volume, not two. Jim further explained that at this another consultant
had to be hired to combine the two volumes. The final EIS is presently
being worked up. However, a short time ago Gov. Dukakis announced that the
• proposed road at Peabody Square should be depressed. As a result the DPW
is requesting a supplemental document for the EIS relative to the depressed
road. Jim explained that presently environmental data is being collected
relative to the depressed road at Peabody Square.
Jim then explained that the engineers have started design work, but that
.no more than 25% of the design can be completed before a public hearing is held.
Jim stated that it will take one year before the EIS for the road is
completed. In addition, it will take 1l� years after that for the design work to
be completed. He finished by stating that, at the present time, the
Bridge_is,3-5_years "away from construction.
He estimated the cost of the total project as 70 million
with the depressed road and 58 million without the depressed road. He further
explained that the breakdown in funding is 70% Federal and 30% State.
Minutes of 8/17/78 Page 5
• Jim also noted that the culverting of the North'.River has not been
adequately covered in the EIS.
Richard Lutts questioned if another public hearing was held with
additional negative comments whether or not the road would be built at
all. Jim replied that the question of the road being eventually built
"has never been an issue."
Ted Sadoski questioned what kind of arguments may be used against
the Connector Road. Jim listed the fact that the Connector Road will be
going through a wetland at Proctor Brook. He also stated that there has
been some controversy that the proposed road will be "dividing the
Greek neighborhood."
Bill Wheaton questioned if alternatives to the Connector road should
be considered. Several alternatives in the form of increasing traffic flow
• in already existing roads were discussed.
Jim then went over the various benefits to Peabody if the Connector Road
is built. Jim stated that as of this point there will be far more land
takings in Salem than Peabody. Jim also stated it will relieve traffic on
Lowell St. and Wilson Square area. He added that the revitalization will
benefit their downtown area and the Road would also help with traffic
connected with the court house.
Jim also stated that he would do a summary of the number of takings in
Peabody and employment that could be affected as well as the relocation data
breakdowns.
Planning Board Aide Report
Michael reported that a Mr. Don Stokes at 74 Webb St. needs to rework
•
Minutes of 8/17/78 Page 6
• the foundation of his house and that this work will not constitute 50%
of the market value of the house. He is in a Flood Hazard Zone. After a
brief discussion, a motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded by Ted
Sadoski that the Wetland/Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance is not applicable to
the repair work proposed by Don Stokes at 74 Webb St. The vote was
unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Michael next described the proposed reconstruction of the Salem
Willows Pier. Michael explained that 18 piles have to be replaced
and that the plan calls for the pier to be restored to its pre-storm
condition. After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Richard Lutts
and seconded by Peter DiGangi that a letter be written to the Building
Inspector stating that the repairs to the Salem Willows Pier as outlined
in the "Specifications for Repairs to the Salem Willows Pier, prepared
• for .the Park Department by Cistar Corporation", do not constitute
"substantial improvement" (over 50% of the total structures market value)
as defined by the Wetlands and Flood Hazard Ordinance and that an application
for a Special Permit from the Planning Board will not be necessary."
The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Relevant to the zoning violation at 5 Bridge St. (Bill and Bob's
Roast Beef) Michael listed three alternatives that Mr. Lagonakis has.
1. Mr. Lagonakis can submit a Notice of Intent to the Conservation
Commission in order to retain the fill he has dumped.
2. Mr. Lagonakis can pull out the fill he has dumped.
3. Mr. Lagonakis can take the case to court.
•
Meeting of 8/17/78 Page 7
• Michael also informed the Board that the ConCom is granting a 30 day
extension in order to give Mr. Lagonakis time enough to file his Notice of
Intent. Michael also stated that at the onsite inspection, it was informally
agreed upon that approximately k of the fill will be removed.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Richard Lutts and seconded
by Paul D'Amour to grant an extension to the time limit for correcting the
zoning violation at 5 Bridge St. from Sept. 1, 1978 to Sept. 13, 1978. The
vote was unanimous and the chairman declared the motion carried.
Master Plan
Cheri Cooper stated that relevant to the Economic element of the Master
Plan that she thought the "Industrial Outreach Program" could be implemented
immediately.
Discussion was next held on-a letter from the City Engineer relevant to
sewer use charges. Various Board Members had questions not fully answered by
the correspondance. It was the•consensus of the Board Members that Mr.
Fletcher be invited to the next Board meeting to further discuss sewer use
charges.
After a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Board Members to
have a work session on September 7, 1978 and have the next regular meeting
on Sept. 14, 1978.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
of
(Out Salem (green
PLANNING BOARD
OCTOBER 5, 1978
1. Attorney Vallis relevant to #5 on the Board of Appeal agenda for
October 10, 1978
2. Board of Appeal Agenda
3. Form A -Catherine Ginty - 11 Buffum St. Salem
4. Master Plan
5. Correspondance
NOTE: Next meeting will be the public hearing on White St. Marina
•
•
J
�;J � ' l � �l�ttutittg �IIartl
` E (ane falem (Srun
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD OCTOBER 5, 1978, 7:30 P.M. , THIRD FLOOR
CONFERNCE ROOM ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Paul D'Amour, Walter Power, Ted Sadoski, John Brown, Donald
Hunt, Peter DiGangi, William Wheaton
Members Absent: Abby Burns, Richard Lutts
Chairman Walter Power opened the regular meeting of the Planning Board at
7:30 P.M.
Form A - Catherine Ginty
The Board first considered a Form A for Catherine Ginty of 11 Buffum St. ,
Salem. Attorney Philip Strome was present to explain what was intended. He
• explained that Ms. Ginty wants to sell Lo't' B to an abutting land owner, Roland
& Patricia Pynn so that they may straighten out the lines to their property.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded
by'_, Peter DiGangi to endorse the Form A of Catherine Ginty of 11 Buffum St. as not
requiring approval under the Subdivision Control laws. The vote was unanimous
and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Board of Appeal Agenda
The Board next considered the Board of Appeal Agenda for October 10, 1978.
The Board discussed the fact that there was not enough information on the Board
of Appeal agenda for the Planning Board to be able to adequately assess them
for possible comments. It was the consensus of. the Board that a letter be
written to the Board of Appeal asking that more information be provided.
Attorney George Vallis spoke to the Board relevant to #5 and #6 on the
• Board of Appeal Agenda. Attorney Vallis explained that one of the buildings
will contain one store and one family apartment and the other will contain one
Meeting of 10/5/78 Page 2
•
store and two apartments. Various Board members expressed concern with the
already congested parking in the Derby St. area. Attorney Vallis stated that
parking for these buildings would be provided by Lot E, as shown on the Plans.
It was noted that the Board of Appeal Agenda states that "a variance is also
requested on the parking requirements."
It was the consensus of the Board members present that a letter be
written to the Board of Appeal stating that although the Planning Board
enthusiastically supports the renovation of the Derby St. Area, we have
serious concerns about any changes that would adversely affect the already
critical parking situation.
It was also the consensus of the Board members present that a letter be
• written to the Board of Appeal relevant to the petition submitted by Rodney
Maurice for a variance at 126-130 Boston St. , stating that the Planning
Board is opposed to the subdivision of any lot into portions which do not meet
current zoning standards as to frontage, density and area, when each portion
of the subdivided property contains an existing residential structure.
It was also the consensus of the Board members present that a letter be
written to the Board of Appeal relevant to the petition submitted by Angelo
and Janice Pramas for a variance at 27 Northey St. stating that the Planning
Board is not opposed to this request as long as the vacant portion of
the lot is joined to the abutters property in order to form a single lot. We
would recommend that where possible the remaining lots resulting from being
divided meet current zoning requirements.
Chairman Walter Power noted that the Board has received a letter from Mar-
quis cleaners, Inc. requesting that their Wetland/Flood Hazard Special Permit
application for a proposed addition at 26 Hersey St. be withdrawn without
prejudice.
Minutes of 10/5/78 Page 3
•
Master Plan
Cheri informed the Board that she met with the City Council Committee on
Community Development to review the draft of the Environment Element of the
Master Plan.
Cheri noted that Councillor Usovitz suggested that Policy 114 in "Our
Water Resources" which reads "To adopt legislative provisions in local
ordinances which return water receipts to the water department for use in
implementing water improvements.", be changed so that the monies received could
be used in many areas and not be tied to the water department. It was the
consensus of the Board that policy 114 remain the same.
Councillor O'Keefe suggested that policy 1111 in "Our Water Resources"
be reworded to read, "To revolt against the requirement of secondary sewerage
treatment on the grounds that it is (1) not cost - effective for a coastal
community; (2) not an effective means of treatment; (3) primary plant not
operating effectively; (4) data incomplete as to efficiency of secondary
treatment." It was the consensus of the Board that the words "To strongly
resist" be added to the present wording.
Councillor O'Keefe also asked that an additional action strategy be added
to this section which would read "To investigate the feasibility of dredging
and cleaning operations in the area around Pickman Park beach so as to
draw a balance between concervation and public use of open space areas."
It was the consensus of the Board Members that this be added.
Councillor O'Keefe also suggested that an additional Action Strategy be
added to the Recreation section which would read, "To ensure the continued
• use of Pickman Park as a beach and recreation area." It was the consensus
of the Board members present that this additional action strategy read,
"To encourage the continued use of Pickman park as a beach and recreation
Minutes of 10/5/78 Page 4
• area."
The Board next considered the draft of the Private Sector Economy element of
the Master Plan. Relevant to the Labor Force section, it was suggested that an
additional chart and explanatory text be added clarifying jobs available versus
employment (Salem residents and workers versus workers in Salem who reside
elsewhere) . It was also suggested that the demise of the leather industry be
clarified.
Under the section "Industry", it was suggested that Beverly Airport be
added to the list of advantages for businesses who settle in Salem. It was
also the consensus of the Board that "Incubator Space" be added to the list
of advantages. Under the disagvantages for locating in Salem, it was the
consensus of those present that 116 be reworded to read, "Inadequacies of water
• and sewer for industrial expansion in outlying areas.
Under the section "Wholesale/Retail Trade, it was the consensus of the Board
that a new paragraph be added that would outline the idea of Salem as a regional
marketplace introduces new dollars into the local economy. A paragraph will also
be added regarding housing in the downtown area, which will :help to support
additional retail trade in the City.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:24 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
•
of �$aleni, Aassar4usetts
jllatming Pnarl
Ottlem Green
PLANNING BOARD
Agenda 10/19/78
1. Wetlands Public Hearing - Tassinari and Burba
2. Meeting with Peabody Planning Board
3. Notes from your Clerk
4. Planning Board Aide Report
5. Waterfront experts 8:30 - infinity
6. Correspondance
7. Adjourn
• 8. Note: APARTMENT WANTED: New Junior Planner and wife seek quiet apartment .
No children; one tiny, well housetrained, well behaved
poodle. Contact Cheri or Nancy (744-8968) .
•
. � FFiiTT
�.war� �LTti of �2T�Ettl� M852TCI�TTSPt'3
(Pur Dale 1l (AIPPn
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD OCTOBER 19, 1978, 7:30 P.M. , THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Richard Lutts, Ted Sadoski, John Brown, Abby Burns, Peter
DiGangi, Donald Hunt, Paul D'Amour,^Wslliam Wheaton, Walter
Power
Chairman Walter Power opened the Wetlands/Flood Hazard public hearing
for Messrs. Tassinari and Burba at 7:30 P.M.
Michael Moniz presented the background information. He stated that
the special permit being sought is for the construction of a pump house and
paving. Michael noted that at a previous Planning Board meeting, discussion had
• been held on the bulkhead as well as the location of the gas tanks. Michael
also reminded the Board that a letter had been received from James Brennan,
Fire Chief, which states that he "shall permit the continued use of the
dispensing pump with the provision that this permission shall terminate
on 12/31/78 if the real estate transfer has not been consumated." Relevant
to the bulkhead, Michael read a letter received from Messrs. Tassinari
and Burba stating that the 'work on the bulkhead has been completed. As
to the installation of the fuel tanks, Michael read the on-site report that
has been received from Lt. Goggin which was favorable.
In addition, Michael called the Board's attention to the comments
that were made by the Conservation Commission, Board of Health, Building
Inspector and the City Engineer. All four commenting Boards and agencies
concurred with the proposal.
Michael showed the Board the drawings of the pump house that
were stamped by a registered Civil Engineer, Thomas Meller. Michael added
that City Engineer, Anthony Fletcher, has reviewed the flood proofing plans
Minutes of 10/19/78 Page 2
• and found them acceptable.
Walter Power questioned how the fuel pumps were anchored. Michael Moniz
in reading from Lt. Goggin's report noted that on 5/1/78, Lt. Goggin "inspected
the reinforced concrete pad for the tanks" and on 5/2/78 he "inspected the tanks
strapped to the pad".
Peter DiGangi questioned what would happen if the shed was washed away
as a result of a storm. Mr. Tassinari replied that there were electrical circuit
breakers and that there would be no fuel lines in the shed.
The Chairman declared the public hearing closed at 7:40 P.M.
The Chairman opened the regular Planning Board meeting at 7:41 P.M.
A motion was made by Abby Burns and seconded by Richard Lutts to accept
the minutes of September 21 , 1978 as writted. The vote was unanimous and the
• Chairman declared the motion carried.
Walter Power briefly spoke of the proposed meeting with the Peabody
Planning Board relevant to a meeting about the proposed connector road. It
was the consensus of the Board Members that Walter contact Alan Taubert and
set up the meeting.
Cheri Cooper next spoke to the Board of money needed for the printing
of the transportation study that was done by Voorhees. Cheri explained that
she has spoken to several Boston firms and has received estimates of between
$500-$800 for the printing.
Abby Burns questioned why fifty copies of this plan were necessary.
Cheri explained that there was a need for fifty copies to fulfil the legal
requirement to hold a public hearing. The public hearing is necessary in
order to qualify for funding for the implementation of the study. Cheri
• added that the City will have to pay for the engineering required and that
the Planning Department is looking for a Small Cities grant for the rest.
Minutes of 10/19/78 Page 3
•
A motion was made by William Wheaton and seconded by Peter DiGangi
to allocate up to $800 for the printing of fifty copies of the traffic
study by Voorhees. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the
motion carried.
Form A - George Alberghini , 2 Walter St.
Planning Board Aide, Michael Moniz, was present to explain what was
intended. Michael explained that there are two contiguous lots which are
under one ownership and will be divided so as to leave one dwelling on
each remaining parcel. Both parcels will have frontage on accepted streets.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Abby Burns to endorse the
Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control law. The
vote was unanimous and the chairman declared the motion carried.
• Housing Application
Michael explained that there is a housing application being submitted on
October 27th by the Housing Authority and the Planning Department to the
Department of Community Affairs for 80-100 units of new or rehabilitated
housing for the elderly. If the City gets the units then they will consider
various sites. Sites now being considered include St. John Baptist Church,
Telephone Bldg. , upper floors of the YMCA, old high school, nurses quarters at
the hospital and the Mazzarini site across from the jail. Michael further
stated that Nancy Kepes, who is the Planning Department coordinator for this
project would like a letter of endorsement from the Board relevant to this
project.
During the ensuing discussion, various Board Members questioned if the
population of this proposed housing would be primarily Salem residents. They
• also addressed the larger issue of whether the Board should, as a matter of
precedence, be issuing letters of endorsement for all Planning Department
projects.
Minutes of 10/19/78 Page 4
• Master Plan
Michael Moniz ran a slide presentation of the various coastal areas of
Salem and Walter Power initiated discussion following each areas slide
presentation.
Kernwood Area
Discussion of this area brought suggestions from the assembled experts
and Board Members which included the following suggestions:
1. Down zoning for the shoreland.
2. Conservation restrictions at Peter's Pond.
3. Small neighborhood beach at Kernwood Marina.
North River
Discussion of this area brought suggestions from the assembled experts and
Board Members which included the following suggestions:
• 1. Ralph Hobbs stated that there would be a problem with dredging as to what
to do with the mud.
2. Dredge area to accomodate small marina on North Salem side.
3. Tony Fletcher spoke of Connector Road plans to fill part of the North River and
Ralph Hobbs pointed out that the North River provides cooling breezes for
adjacent resedential neighborhoods.
Bridge St. Neck
Discussion of this area brought suggestions from the assembled experts and
Board Members which included the following suggestions:
1. It was pointed out that the construction of the Connector Road would take
traffic off Bridge St. and this area could become a tourist area.
2. Ralph Hobbs pointed out that the Beverly Bridge is open to N.E. storms
• and that there is not enough water on inward side.
3. Gas Company site could provide beach and parking.
Minutes of 10/19 Page 5
• Collins Cove
Discussion of this area brought suggestions from the assembled experts and
Board Members which included the following suggestions:
1. One of the best potential marina sites and could contain 539 slips.
2. Possible parking for 400 vehicles depending on the fill available
from the dredging.
3. Old hospital could be used as a motel, restaurant, or marine storage.
4. Ralph Hobbs noted that the Cove was storm safe.
Salem Neck:
Discussion of this area brought suggestions from the assembled experts and
Board Members which included the following suggestions:
Willows:
1. Discussion was held on it containing family restaurants, but it was
pointed out that a liquor license cannot be granted in close proximity to
parkland.
Winter Island:
1. Exposed to SW and so is not a good marina site. Too much ledge and rough
water.
2. To develop Winter Island will need an additional access road.
3. Campground, recreational vehicles, and recreation and water uses ideal.
4. Cat Cove marine lab may close this winter. City should investigate
acquisition as best marina location. Willows Pier suitable for town
landing.
Additional suggestions which were made during 'the discussion as to needs
for the waterfront included, access, parking, dredging, public rest rooms,
• explore pleasure fishing potential, need to streamline permit process for
waterfront developments and the need to control vandalism.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
... a
Ctv of Salelll, Aass c4usE#ts
1launing 'Poarl
(Out OalPm (firren
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD NOVEMBER2, 1978, 7:30 P.M. , THIRD FLOOR
CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Ted Sadoski, William Wheaton, Donald Hunt, Walter Power,
Abby Burns, Peter DiGangi
Members Absent: John Brown, Paul D'Amour, Richard Lutts
Chairman Walter Power called the meeting to order at 2:30 P.M. on the
third floor of One Salem Green.
Form A - Anthony and Mario Angenica
Mario Angenica of 12 Angenica Terrace, Marblehead was present to explain what
was intended. Mario explained that the major portion of the land being
considered is in Marblehead and that the Marblehead Planning Board has already
endorsed this Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control
Law. He further explained that the banks he is dealing with relevant to
his proposed development, as well as his engineer ingormed him that he
needs the endorsement of both the Marblehead and Salem Planning Boards.
Ted Sadoski pointed out that, although technically the segment of land
created from the land under the jurisdiction of the Salem Planning Board
does not have adequate frontage, the portion of the land located in Salem
is only a portion of the whole parcel of land which is located in Marblehead
and that is part of a subdivision plan which has been approved by the
Marblehead Planning Board and will meet the zoning requirements under
Salem's Zoning Ordinance.
A motion was then made by Ted Sadoski and seconded by Abby Burns to
• endorse the Form A as not requiring approval under the Subdivision
Control law. The vote was unanimous and the Chairman declared the
motion carried.
A motion was made by Ted Sadoski and seconded by Abby Burns
Minutes of 11/2/78 Page 2
• to approve the minutes of October 5, 1978 as written. The vote was unanimous
and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Walter Power informed the Board that a letter has been received from
Bill Tinti stating that although a decision has not been made by the
court relevant to the Cluster Residential Special Permit granted by the
Planning Board to the Pickman Park developer, the Board can still vote
on the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit being sought for the same
development.
A brief discussion followed as to whether this information should
be forwarded to the person who originally raised this question at the
Wetlands public hearing. It was the consensus of the Board that Bill
Tinti be questioned as to the advisability of this. It was also the
consensus of the Board that this Special Permit application be voted on at the
• next Planning Board Meeting.
Planning Board members also expressed interest in having various members
of the Salem Housing Authority speak to them relevant to housing in
Salem and housing for the elderly.
Walter Power next thanked Planning Board Aide Michael Moniz for
his service to the Planning Board during the past year and wished him
luck for the future.
Master Plan
Cheri informed the Board that on Mon. , November 6th they would be
reviewing the General Introduction, Introduction, Harbor Islands and
the summary of the Waterfront element of the Master Plan. She added that
Community Facilities and Services will also be discussed as well as experts
choosen for community Facilities and Services.
Minutes of 11/2/78 Page 3
• Ted Sadoski in speaking of the Waterfront section of the Master Plan
stated that the sentence on page 5 which reads "The City also has
rights to Dearborn Street" is questionable. Cheri will remove this
statement.
The highlights of the discussion that followed 'relevant to
Community Facilities and Services is attached to these minutes.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted.
•
PLANNING BOARD REVIEW
COMMUNITY FACILITIES/SERVICES
• STRUCTURE OF GOVERNMENT
NOVEMBER 2, 1978
A. POLICE
1. To reestablish neighborhood outreach program for citizen awareness,
on breaking and. entering .(To .reduce crimes of break and enter,:robbery) :--•:: c,. c:
2. To establish programs to reduce vandalism, juvenile problems.
3. To further investigate the creation of the position of civilian
police commissioner.
4. To develop a joint fire and police department team to investigate
arson.
5. To develop a joint police, fire, and harbor patrol team.
6. To develop emergency policy procedures for use during diasters,
emergencies.
7. To transform the image of the police department from that of a response
or reactionary agency to that of a preventive agency.
8. To investigate the feasibility of reducing the need for additional
police officers in the downtown .area, in industrial and commercial
areas through the intallation of television monitoring equipment
installed in strategic locations and tied into the police station.
9. To develop foot patrols in high density neighborhood areas.
10. To increase man power training.
B. FIRE
• 1. To investigate the feasibility of using the Pickering School site, or
a similarly located site for the construction of a new fire station
serving North Salem (To locate a site) .
2. To install a traffic signal activated by fire apparatus on North
Street as an interim solution in North Salem, pending the location
of a suitable site location for the construction of a new station.
3. To locate (a) suitable site(s) in the developing outlying areas of
the City such as Witchcraft Heights and Loring Avenue for the
construction of additional fire stations.
4. To determine the need for additional fire equipment and facilities
for use along the waterfront, given proposed waterfront development,
increased recreational boating activities, and increased boat fuel
facilities along the waterfront.
5. To investigate the effectiveness of fire fighting with Salem waters.
6. To develop a joint police/fire/harbor patrol team for fire prevention
and fire fighting on Salem waters.
7. To develop a joint police and fire department team to investigate arson.
8. To develop known emergency fire mobilization procedures for use
during disasters.
•
4: ge 2
C. CIVIL DEFENSE/EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
1. To develop a comprehensive mobilization plan for disasters and major
emergencies to ensure that procedures and roles of each City agency are
precise and clear. Emergency plans should be developed for use in
emergencies such as LNG tank problems, LNG truck problems, blizzards '
and snow emergencies, hurricanes, floods, and other natural disasters, '
major fires involving various sections of the City, chemical disasters,
-._._. --air._pollution,.alerts i..and-.others::;' . :. - _._:- _..__._._.....__, __.__--------->---
2. To develop known, standard procedures for disaster relief, cleanup,
and funding procedures.
3. To design mobilization plans and emergency procedures to be com-
plementary with those of the state and federal government, to enable
program eligibility for state and federal funding.
D. HARBOR PATROL
1. To investigate the effectiveness of fire control on Salem waters.
2. To develop a harbor patrol team consisting of personnel from the
harbor patrol, police and fire departments to ensure safety in
Salem waters.
E. PUBLIC WORKS-STREETS
1. To prepare for snow removal efforts year round, through the implementation
of a street improvement program (Patching, resurfacing, etc.) .
2. To improve snow removal and street cleaning efforts throughout the City.
3. To uniformly post hydrant identification flags througout the City
• early in the snow removal season.
4. To consider beginning the parking ban for.snow removal later in the
season.
5. To enforce parking bans, through towing and ticketing during the snow
season.
6. To prohibit parking along approaches to intersections and traffic signals to
increase lane width.
7. To create and enforce tow zones where parking is prohibited along major
arteries.
8. To develp a comprehensive snow artery plan.
F. PUBLIC PROPERTY/INSPECTIONS
1. To develop procedures for and to dispose of excess surplus properties.
2. To investigate the feasibility of combining all agencies having inspections,
including building, plumbing, gas, electrical, zoning, signs, licenses
into one City Department under a single head to be known as the Code "
Enforcement or Inspection Bureau.
3. To clarify enforcement responsibility of the sign ordinance. To have one person
designated to enforce the sign ordinance and zoning.
G. CITY FINANCIAL AGENCIES
1. To develop and implement modern assessing and tax techniques, and to
develop a computerized program similar to that used in California
which continually updates property value information and billing using
computer modelling.
• 2. To conduct a modern managerial study of City financial agencies including
Data Processing, auditing, treasury, purchasing, and taxes, and to
implement recommended changes which result in increased efficiencies of
information handling.
Page 3
• 3. To computerize official City records and records of all City De-
partments, and to develop software programming which facilitates future'
planning.
4. To investigate existing City procedures for obtaining insurance for City .
equipment and 'vehicles, and to designate one City agency or official as
having the responsibility of insuring all City equipment, vehicles, facilities,
_ . .. ......_ _. _.. .and personnel. . ..
H. PERSONNEL
1. To abolish the civil service system for City employees.
2. To increase the term of Mayor from two to four years.
3. To improve the efficiency of City employees.
4. To reduce the number of public employees, through the establishment
of staffing limits.
5. To investigate the possibility of reducing the expenditure for pension
benefits by reducing the number of employees reaching retirement age.
6. To develop.'a labor pool of retired workers willing to work in a part-
time capacity for the City.
I. LIBRARIES
1. To investigate the feasibility and desirability of consolidating library
facilities.
K. HOUSING AUTHORITY/COUNCIL ON AGING
1. To sell the old Salem High School to a private developer for use
•. as elderly housing.
L. TOURIST/MAMC
1. To consolidate agencies as previously stated.
M.. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
1. To coordinate efforts of industrial development and planning through the
Planning Department.
N. SHAUGHNESSY REHAB HOSPITAL
1. To dispose of the Shaughnessy Rehab Hospital at the earliest possible time.
0. SOCIAL SERVICES/HEALTH SERVICES
1. The City should not be involved in the provision of social or health
services and should terminate or substantially reduce its provision
of these services.
P. . EDUCATION
1. To improve the quality of education in the Salem School System.
2. To improve management of school facilities and services.
3. To terminate bussing programs for private schools, and bussing
of Salem children out of Salem.
Q. CULTURAL ARTS
1. Same as Planning Department.
•
CITY OF SALEM E'
ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS BY GRADE
1965 - 1978
GRADE 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 i975, : 1976 1977 '1978
K 572 605 555 594 613 576 550 503 525 441 442;1 438 442 358 .
1 477 502 562 516 547 564 590 584 522 523 517. ' 452 476 449
i
2 435 437 455 523 474 491 558 564 576 483 479 471 .450 449
3 407 422 418 474 531 471 522 583 584 " ' 529 1 530 491 1 483 429
I
4 400 407 435 415 461 540 517 550 615 534 530 ' 466 477 477
5 408 424 399 442 429 487 598 548 554 557 551'; 525 514 448
6 391 414 410 423 442 430 547 621 543 554 552 521 536 498
"i
7 396 422 439 411 449 477 499 573 633 549 1 536.? 561 555 1 524
t
8 374 401 414 438 415 450 509 500 581 634 624'! 555 552 544
i
Elementary 4840 4815 5073 5363 54I6 5365'i 4618 4525 4292
i
9 456 496 501 501 509 498 494 566 500 560 534 f 526 571 598
10. 467 449 464 492 503 529 488 493 538 '478 475 685 1 635 475
11 423 441 414 412 449 493 518 474 485 491 492 494 505 534
!
12 421 396 ' 401 * * "387 413 434 '474 ' 486 ' 448 433 '432 '!' "464 433 ' 458
• t
Vocational 105. 114 128 142 150 ;. 148 ' 152 137
Total All Schools. 5627 5'816 5867 6028 6235 6440 6804 7045 7460 7472 7339!' "6735 '6765 " *6352
i
Hi h. School 1874 1912 ' '1927 " 1956 ' '1914 1824.:!' "1968 2088 1923
Private Schools,
In 'State "785 ' NA" j' 1158 824 723
SOURCE: Annual Reports of the School Committee % of Enrolled
City of Salem Salem Students 10.5 NA i 17.2 12.2 11.4
1
-
�'y'/YYi✓ � y�
�7-; l� (��7J7j� `� . �� .--- Cyt;-�-•-�
� �e
of �ttlem, �ttssttcl�nse##s
G (One 0aletu preen
MINUTES OF THE SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD DECEMBER 7, 1978, 7:30 P.M. , THIRD
FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
Members Present: Abby Burns, Paul D'Amour, William Wheaton, John Brown,
Ted Sadoski, Walter Power, Richard Lutts
Members Absent: Peter DiGangi, Donald Hunt
Chairman Walter Power opened the meeting with a quorum present at
7:30 P.M.
A motion was made by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Abby Burns to approve
the minutes of October 19, 1978 and November 2, 1978 as written. The vote
was unanimous and the chairman declared the motion carried,
• Form A
A Form A from the estate of Lillian Hill was presented to the Board by
Attorney Robert Raymond, In explaining the background of the property
he explained that before he recently went before the Board of Appeal the
property was zoned as one unit. Hestated that he has received approval
from the Board of Appeal that the land be zoned separately. ,He also
pointed out that the proposed Form A would leave the lots with proper
frontage on a public way. After a brief discussion, a motion was made
by Paul D'Amour and seconded by Richard Lutts to endorse the Form A as not
requiring approval under the Subdivision Control laws. The vote was
unanimous and the Chairman declared the motion carried.
Nathaniel Bowditch Park
In bringing the Board members up to date, Michael Moniz explained that
a $30,000 grant has been received from CZM to complete design drawings and
Meeting of 12/7/78 Page 2
• engineering drawings for the proposed Nathaniel Bowditch Park. Michael
informed the Board that nine proposals have been submitted for this project
and that by December 11th the Planning Department will select two or three
of these proposals for interviews. The interviews with these firms will
be scheduled for December 18th and any interested Board members are
invited to attend.
Wetland/Flood Hazard Zoning
Michael explained that he is in the process of drafting an ammendment
to the Wetland/Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance. He stated that the amendment
would create a procedure similar to the "Determination of Applicability"
utilized by the Conservation Commission. He added that this amendment': would
serve to simplify compliance with the ordinance for much of the general
public.
• Ted Sadoski questioned whether some of the requirements under the
Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance could be eliminated and still have the City
qualify under the Federal Flood Hazard Insurance. Michael replied that
Salem's Flood Hazard Zoning goes beyond HUD's requirements for flood
insurance.
The Board members then discussed the benefits and drawbacks to the
Flood Insurance program. Ted Sadoski requested that the Planning De-
partment do an informal survey in order to ascertain whether home owners
in Salem benefit from this program or if only commercial concerns benefit.
House of Seven Gables
Michael explained that the House of Seven Gables is having wash out
problems with their seawall. The embankment is being washed out under the
wall. Michael further explained that a concrete seal couls be used to
• correct the situation. Michael also added that City Engineer, Anthony
Fletcher thinks that this would be an acceptable remedy for the situation.
Meeting of 12/7/78• Page 3
• Michael than asked for a consensus of the Board as to whether the Wetlands/
Flood Hazard Zoning Ordinance would apply to this proposed work. It was
the consensus of the Board members present that this work was not
applicable.
Pickman Park
The Board members discussed' the Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit
to be issued to Salem Acres. After reviewing comments submitted by the
City Engineer, a motion was made by John Brown and seconded by Abby
Burns that a Wetlands/Flood Hazard Special Permit be issued to Salem
Acres Inc. for the proposed Pickman Park Development with the condition
that additional drainage calculations be submitted to the City Engineer
for his approval.
• FY80 Budget
Board members were reminded that the deadline for the submission
of the Planning Board Budget for FY80 is December 13, 1978. After a
brief discussion it was the consensus of the Board that Walter Power
meet with either Greg Senko or David Lash of the Planning Department in
order to construct the Planning Board Budget for FY80.
Master Plan
Discussion was held on City Development agencies. It was noted that
there was a lot of overlapping of functions between the Chamber, Tourism
Board and the MAMC. Discussion followed as to various possibilities for
streamlining various functions of these agencies. Mr. Furfaro also
pointed out that in addition to the overlapping of functions there was
the opposite problem in other areas, such as maintainence of the down
• town renewal area, where no one seems to be responsible.
Meeting of 12/7/78 Page 4
•. Vincert Furfuro, Chairman of the MAMC, also pointed out that the
price estimates for enclosing the market stall area would be from 1 - 2
million dollars and that there was no source of funding to do this that
he was aware of.
Cheri stated that at next Monday's meeting on the Master Plan
there would be a discussion of Housing, neighborhoods and community
appearances.
The Board next discussed possible consultants relevant to the Housing
Element of the Master Plan. Possible consultants included a representative
from the Salem Housing Authority, a representative from Stern-Tice, Bill Little
from Carlsons, Robert Bramble, Jim McAllister, as well as a representative
from the SRA and Salem State.
• The Board then discussed additional information that has been re-
ceived from the Police and the Council on Aging.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted.
,
• SALEM PLANNING BOARD
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 21, 1978
PUBLIC HEARING
MINUTES
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT
McDONALDS CORP, 420 PROVIDENCE HIGHWAY, WESTWOOD, MA
In Attendance: Walter Power, III, Chairman, Planning Board
Peter DiGangi, John Brown,; Ted Sadoski, Paul
D'Amout, Members of the Planning Board;
Michael Moniz, Planning Department; Cheri
Cooper, Planning Department, serving as clerk.
Chairman Power called the hearing to order at 7:43 PM, December 21, 1978,
and outlined the permit request, explaining that McDonalds Corp. wished
to add a carport service entry at its facility on Canal Street in Salem,
Mass. which is located in the A3 zone of the Flood Hazard District.
Michael Moniz briefly described the proposed project using plans presented
by McDonalds. The project consists of a proposed addition to be six feet
wide and twelve feet, four inches in length, to include a service window.
He stated that the Planning Board area of concern is that the water table
• is located only three feet below the ground surface, and is subject to
tidal action. McDonald's proposes to float a concrete slab four feet
minimum below the surface. Plans and sections were reviewed by Board
members.
Access and egress to McDonalds would also be, Lered resulting in an
improved arrangement. The Street Department has already cleared changes
to access and egress.
Mr. Moniz then read a letter from Mrs. E. Theriault, a resident of 15 Meadow
Street in Salem who is opposed to the McDonald's addition because of added
pollution, congestion, and anticipated increased presence of juveniles in
the area.
Negative comments by the attorney representing the Tassinari Garage were
also described by Mr. Moniz; although no attorney or letter was available.
Comments were also presented by Mr. Moniz from the City Engineer, who
is in agreement with all requirements; Health Agent concurs with proposal;
Building Inspector concurs with proposal; Conservation Commission: Needs
more information. Does not concur with proposal. Comments: should
provide thorough elevations; shows no details of floodproofing. No
action required by Conservation Commission with respect to Wetlands
Protection Act.
Mr. Moniz stated that he requested that the building contractor provide final
elevations and information on flood proofing for the Public Hearing, however,
no such information had been received.
•
�:.., Page 2
. Elevations shown on the plan indicated that the elevation was 199.5, however,
McDonald's had used their own base elevation, so that the elevation could
not be translated onto the City's base.
Mr. Sadoski stated that although _flooding has occurred in Salem since McDonalds
was built, 'he was unaware of McDonalds ever being flooded.
Mr. DiGangi questioned the changed location of access and egress.
Mr. Moniz showed the proposed alteration on the plan.
Mr. DiGangi asked if adequate space would be allowed for two lanes of traffic
in both directions.
Mr. Moniz stated that 20+ feet were indicated as being allowed.
Chairman Power asked if there were any additional questions.
There being none, Chairman Power asked if there were any objections to
the plan. There being none, Ted Sadoski moved that the application meets
the requirements of the flood hazard zone. The motion was seconded by
Peter DiGangi. There being a unanimous vote, motion carried, permit granted.
Chairman Power adjourned the Public Hearing at 8:03 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Cheryl Cooper,
Acting as Clerk
of 'S'alettt, 'Mttssac4uset#s
�; • M f � �jtttutittg '�Darl
(Our jDatettt preen
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
1. Correction of Minutes of December 21, 1978
2. Chris Olney - Resolution on Heritage Plaza West
3. Form A - Herbert and Grace Hill (22� Buffum Street)
4. 8:30 P.M. - Government Finance Work Session with Consultants
•