Loading...
1971-PLANNING BOARD J 071 :. MORI y ,caw THOMAS BERUBE it� of tt1Em, � tt88ttt liSE##S ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN 1l1an ning Vourb JAMES GARRITY Y3 k�ff aa33 JANE LUNDREGAN krcl. h� UOIII 7 -- }�1 if11 GERALD McCARTHY V1l GEORGE NOWAK TADIUSSADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING The first meeting of the New Year was held in the Health Center building for the first time . It is believed at this time that this will be the regular meeting place of the Board in the future. Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened the meeting at 7: 30 P.M. , with all mem- bers present excepting Jane Lundregan and Tadios Sadoski who were unable to attend. On motion of Abby Burns, seconded by James Garrity, it was voted to ap- prove and accept .the minutes of the last meeting. A notification from the City Clerk regarding submission in duplicate of the annual report of the Board prior to the first of April was read to the meeting. A summary of activities of the Massachusetts Federation of Planning Boards, dated January 1, 1971, was brought to the meeting. All members received a copy. The Chairman suggested that it would be advisable if • some members could plan to attend meetings of the Federation when noti- fied of the time and place of these meetings. The recording secretary will check into how these matters are handled financially in order that any member attending any function in connection with the Board' s activ- ities may be reimbursed for any charges incurred for transportation, dining, memberships, etc. A reply from Alan Altshuler, Director Boston Transportation Planning Re- view was received and read to this meeting, with regard to his deputy, Jack Wofford, who will have primary responsibility for managing the North Shore Planning Review. Mr. Altshuler believes Mr. Wofford would be the most suitable representative of the Governor' s office to meet with this Board to discuss transportation problems. A letter from the Commissioner of Public Works, Edward J. Ribbs, also in reply to a letter from the Board was read to the meeting. Mr. Ribbs re- ferred to the fact that Governor Sargent had announced to the press last week that all design pertaining to route I-95 from the Cutler Circle in Revere to Route 128 in Peabody was suspended. This of course, also per- tains to the connectors proposed to terminate in the Vinnin Square area and the Beverly-Salem Bridge area. Another reply to this Board' s request for a meeting and discussion with representatives of the MBTA was received and read at this meeting. Un- fortunately, since the letter was received, the writer, Francis O'Brien, • liasion officer, has been confined to the hospital. Chairman Gerald McCarthy spoke briefly, advising that the Treplacement for Mr. O'Brien % _ 2 Will be Mr. Mahoney. As there is some concern for funds for this project, the only thing he can do is discuss with us what they are going to do if they have the money. The City Engineer, Mr. Ralph Tedford, advised the Board of his examination of the Dundee Street subdivision which disclosed that the only major item missing appears to be the surface course on the greater portion of the side- walk, which the new developer assures will be completed in the Spring. Counselor George Vallis, representing the new developer, Michael Stasinos, requested that a letter be forwarded to Mr. Tedford for his advice and counsel with regard to the amount of security which should be held for the release of the remaining lots. Mr. Garrity moved that the Board write to the City Engineer for his opinion as to what would be a sufficient amount of money to be held until the satisfactory and approved completion of all of the work involved here, seconded by Mr. Freeman, all in favor, and so moved. Copies of decisions from recent Board of Appeal hearings were presented to the meeting. Statistical information, entitled "Metropolitan Area Planning Council, Report #2 - 1970 U. S. Census" , was received by the Board and copies dis- tributed to all members. A plan submitted by Counselor Vallis in behalf of Salem Acres, Inc. , accom- panied by the required Form A application, was studied by the members. Mr. Vallis explained that the three lots involved are located in the most recent subdivision in the Witchcraft Heights development, and the only change from that approved plan would be a change of lot lines affecting Lots #222A, #223A and #227A on Sable Road and Buena Vista Avenue. Mr.Freeman moved that this plan be endorsed as not req#iring approval under Subdivision Control Law, seconded by Mr. Berube, all in favor, and so voted approved. A request for consideration of the resignation of the recording secretary, submitted some months past, was received and read to the meeting. A discus- sion followed this announcement with regard to the replacement and appointing of a new secretary. This was the final order of business for the evening, and by unanimous vote, the meeting adjourned at 8: 15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, /Lo N� C TY PLANYING BOARD, Clerk i - r 'r THOAS o �$ 1 ttlem, assar usetts ABBY BURNS BERUBE ' MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY lttnnin� uttrD s r c9 JANE LUND BEGAN �s a i• J cLMti'FU'�5' �i aam 7 -- CtU Pall GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI 'RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA, CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 1.7.71 1. Distribute copies of communications from Massachusetts Federation of Planning Boards, and from Alan Altshuler to all Board members. 2. Minutes of last meeting. 3. Notification from City Clerk regarding annual report, in duplicate . 4. Summary of activities of Massachusetts Federation of Planning Boards, January 1, 1971. 5. Reply from Alan Altshuler, director Boston Transportation Planning Review. 6. Board letter to Mr. Pitcoff, regarding status of work in Peter Road area. 7. Response from Edward J. Ribbs, Commissioner of Department of Public Works relating to I-95 and connector routes. • 8. Communication from Francis O'Brien, Massachusetts Bay Transporta- tion Authority, dated 12.21 in reply to letter from this Board. 9. Letter from Mr. Tedford, City Engineer, advising of present con- dition of Dundee Street subdivision. 10. Copies of Board of Appeals decisions from most recent hearings. 11. Premiere Issue booklet "Government Data Systems" . 12. Statistical information, Metropolitan Area Planning Council, Report #2 - 1970 U. S. Census. • �ytr !� nyy{ y ¢y��+Cy1T�+ r THOMAS BERUBE (fit" lel " (ale ' � assadjusetts ABBY BURNS 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY • ii " C JANE LUNDREGAN Go �4y`A'y. �DUm 7 (Qitg 3rlull GERALD McCARTHV GEORGE NOWAK TADIUSSADOSKI 2. 1 -71 RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 1 . 21.71 The meeting was held at the Health Center Building, at 5 Broad . Street. Chairman Gerald T. McCarthy called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. with Board members Thomas Berube, Abigail Burns, Jane Lundregan, and Thaddeus Sadoski present. Mr. Florini from the Massachusetts Department of' Community Affairs add- ressed the members at length. He stated that he had reviewed the Blair Report, and while the report had been completed almost ten years ago, _he felt that there was much in the report that had value, and felt that the needs of a Comprehensive Plan could be met by reviewing the Blair Report and bringing it up to date where necessary. He stated that such an up- dating would satisfy HUD, and allow continuing qualification under the Workable Program. There are Hands available under the 701 Prodram for planning; because of the limited amounts, Salem could not plan on any assistance before 1972. If a study were made and a program developed, application for these funds could be made as late as November; of the 351 Cities and Towns in Massachusetts, only a very few have received any assistance so far under the 701 Program because of 9 lack of funding. Mr. Florini ' s visit was helpful in that he advised the Board of other alternatives than the self-help program. He advised the Board that his department would be available for planning assistance after the Blair Report has been reviewed and a tentative program has been created. A Mr. Stanton and a Mr. Mahoney from the Planning Department of the MBTA attend the meeting to discuss the plans of the MBTA regarding rapid tran- sit on the North Shore , particularly in Salem as it might be affected by the I-95 connectors. Their discussion was very brief and revealed that there will-be no substantial increase in rapid transit facilities as far as Salem is concerned for at least twenty (20) years. They are -presently subsidizing the commuter service on the Boston & Maine railroad, and running bus service ,to connect with their rapid: transit systems, but lack of funds will prevent any expansion of these services. On motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by Mrs. Burns, it was voted to accept the minutes of the last meeting. A form A application from Robert Warner, 37-39 Mason Street , to divide a single parcel into two parcels for purposes of conveyance, was received by the Board. . A copy of a variance from the zoning laws granted by the Board of Appeals accompanied the application, with regard to lot area , • lot width, and front and side yard setbacks. On motion of Mr: Sadoski, seconded by Mrs. Burns, it was unanimously voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. (z) I A letter from the City Engineer was read, stating that he estimated the work to be done on Dundee Street would be in the amount of $1, 500.00. Thaddeus Sadoski made a motion, lseconded by Thomas Berube, that the Board • accept the recommendation of Mr. Tedford, and advise the developer that a suitable deposit be made with the Board so that the necessary lots could be released. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 PM. i Respectfully submitted, I I CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk i i 1 . r '�'7I♦}y} rr �{ ^yyy y��+Q�} �* n} THOMAS �.Y fu of "Salem, �..1�Gassar4usetts ABBY BURNS UBE ", rrrAyyy❑��� J. 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN .0 IttzTtttng IIarb JAMES GARRITY • �r �r" °9 JANE LUNDREGAN Mos"buum 7 -- (Qitg dull GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK 2. 1.71 TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 1 21 71 The meeting was held at the Health Center Building at 5 Broad Street. Chairman Gerald T. McCarthy called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. with Board members Thomas Berube, Abigail Burns, Jane Lundregan, and Thaddeus Sadoski present. Mr. Florini from the Massachusetts Department of Community Affairs add- ressed the members at length. He stated that he had reviewed the Blair Report, and while the report had been completed almost ten years ago, .he felt that there was much in the report that had value, and felt that the needs of a Comprehensive Plan could be met by reviewing the Blair Report and bringing it up to date where necessary. He stated that such an up- dating would satisfy HUD, and allow continuing qualification under the Workable Program. There are funds available under the 701 Program for planning; because of the limited amounts, Salem could not plan on any • assistance before 1972. If a study were made and a program developed, application for these funds could be made as late as November; of the 351 Cities and Towns in Massachusetts, only a very few have received any assistance so far under the 701 Program because of g lack of funding. Mr. Florini ' s visit was helpful in that he advised the Board of other alternatives than the self-help program. He advised the Board that his department would be available for planning assistance after the Blair Report has been reviewed and a tentative program has been created. A Mr. Stanton and a Mr. Mahoney from the Planning Department of the MBTA attend the meeting to discuss the plans of the MBTA regarding rapid tran- sit on the North Shore, particularly in Salem as it might be affected by the I-95 connectors. Their discussion was very brief and revealed that there will be no substantial increase in rapid transit facilities as far as Salem is concerned for at least twenty (20) years. They are presently subsidizing the commuter service on the Boston & Maine railroad, and running bus service to connect with their rapidstransit systems, but lack of funds will prevent any expansion of these services. On motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by Mrs. Burns, it was voted to accept the minutes of the last meeting. A form A application from Robert Warner, 37-39 Mason Street, to divide a single parcel into two parcels for purposes of conveyance, was received by the Board. A copy of a variance from the zoning laws granted by the • Board of Appeals accompanied the application, with regard to lot area , lot width, and front and side yard setbacks. On motion of Mrs Sadoski, seconded by Mrs. Burns, it was unanimously voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. t (2) A letter from the City Engineer was read, stating that he estimated the • work to be done on Dundee Street would be in the amount of $1, 500.00. Thaddeus Sadoski made a motion, seconded by Thomas Berube, that the Board accept the recommendation of Mr. Tedford, and advise the developer that a suitable deposit be made with the Board so that the necessary lots could be released. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, CITY PLANG BOARD, ttlerk • • • if j. .' '`0'r�'4gm ��nF}�"��{{ THOMASBER UBETi}o a} MALm, UsschunTrs ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITVyyyfinurting Ivarb JANE LUNDREGAN cfpvf. OOriI 7 -- Titg si&II GERALD McCARTHV GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA, CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 1.21. 71 1. Minutes of last meeting. Have these and minutes of previous g meeting signed. 2. Form A application and plan of Robert Warner, 37-39 Mason Street. 3. Letter from City Engineer - re: security to be held for completion of work at Dundee Street development. (Copies sent) 4. Letter from Fenton G Keys, Assoc. -(copies sent) . 5. Notices of next meeting of Appeals Board. 6. "Commerce Digest" - December, 1970, Mass. Dept. of Commerce and Development. • 7. "Regional Report" - Metropolitan Area Planning Council, Jan. 1971. I � ! I I i 1 I i ! I ! ', � � � I I I. I � i � j � 1 I I I I � � i � i I I S I I � � I � I � i 1 � JI � I � I i I I � t i � I t � I � �� i � I I I I � I i 1 I i i I i I ' I � i I 1i � I I \I � + l �I j I I I� �I � � j � � i i i I I i ( ( � �I, � 1 �� � I `� I i I 1 � � i I ,,� � I ; i i � j � � i I � �\f\\ ,i I I U1 I � i I I ' � U i i i �1 I, c I I I � I ! � � I 1 � � 1 � � � , � 1 � I I � � � . � � � � � � I I � � � I � I 1 I � . �1' ; � 1 � I I , � I I i 1 I ' I I I �i � � �; I I I I � r � � � li a ; �� � � � I I i � � � � I I I I I 1 � � �� �{ I � I i � � � � 'S � �o � f I I , I � 1 � I � I I C i I � I I I � I � i \i 1 1 ` I I ' 1 �1 i � I . I � I � I 1 I ' �, I I 1 I � I � � � I j i I I�7� VI I � I I ( � ! �I I I I � i � � i I I , I I� � I I I I N? � I � I �p I I � 1 �� � � �� i I � �� J� �, r I � 1 ��'�', � �I � � � � � I � I I �i �I ' 1 � I � I I � � I � � � 1 I � \I I f� I I I I \\� 1 I 1. i I � f � \ I \� i j I I i i � � � I � i i I I �' I I 1 1 � 1 I 1 � ��� � I , I � I � � � � I � I ' 1 I I I \ I i I; � � i i I ! I � I � C S I � � I I i f j l ' � I l i ' � � I i I � j i � � � I I � i ! i � 1 '�� I I � ! j ! i ! I ' � 1 � I ' I �' i i I / i �-__- I _ _ _ . •_ r � z , ' � l � � � � � a l � K � . � Y � . I f � � 1 ` � Y l � 1 t 1 \n i �. .^� Ai � �" r � ` . 1 7r . . � I � t J � ��� r� a + Ctg n ttiem, Htt srzc �z�Etts •���cumaeo �XMTIIIiIt$ �iQMXa attg pull ul Salem, Aassacllusetts 91970 Q FORM A o Ui APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT W; OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL WIn accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the a: ti y applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a a ►- Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- v mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ------January--7-i______________1971__ To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) Plan proposes_ to __t _ehangehe__sizeandshave of -- ---- ------ three lots located on ways shown on plan previously__ap�rov_-ed --------- --- --- - ----- --------- in accordance with the Subdivision Control Law. ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ----- Acres, Inc. Tl Hancock Street, -Everett---------------------------------------------- Address - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor --_-Carter & Towers Eng._ Corp.________-_____________________ Address-__ _______ 6 Fairview Avenue, Swampscott ----- ------------ E 3. Deed of property records in _____ssex_ ___South__D_i__strict-4------------------ 4, Location and Description of Pro Lot 227 Sable Road and Lots 223 & 222 Buena Vista Avenue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------------------------- --- - • S. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on th lan to er the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. S ACRES / N , Signature of Owner--------, ---'----'----- -- �-- -'-�-- --------------------- -- --- 70 Wlashi,Wton Street, Salem Address----------------------- — ---------------- Telephone Number ----744-2172-----------------_-------------------------------------------------- 1 �'1 CHU of $az1m, fflassar4usttts • ''aae�� ��tlkgttY[$ �II2IY� CHU Rall �alem, �lassachasetts A197D ti V o aA NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO W fMl n'a > Ch ,f FORM "A"APPLICATIONS U U1 UJ UA J J See Form "A" applications for Cr ~' r� complete instructions for filing. C3 All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: January 7 , 1971 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ...Sable---Road- -and Buena_ - - -- -- -- - ---- Vista Avenue _-___________________ in Ward ---qi � ----------------------------------------- - (insert street and street numbers here) SALEM ACRESBySignature of Owner ------- ,i --4---- ------- 70 Washingto Street Street Address - - ------------ - - City/rown&State Salem, Massachusetts Telephone Number --------744-2172------------------------------------------------------------------------- - • PLAN OF LAND SALEM , MASS. SALEM ACRES INC. SCALE I"= 40' NOV. 3011970 CARTER & TOWERS ENGIR CORP. SWAMPSCOTT , MASS. 00 FZE�UH:D �/ tS o'v of- L , -'5 2Z2, 2Z3$22'( P b P�annn��3oarcl appro.ial nod p re�vi.res� und<r �{�� Subdiv inion �c�ntrol Lai.., . dale 224 225 226 153 LA G v c � i 45pc� N /N1 ---� • 0 � � p o D 222A '7300 L S-F 191.4_2 549'39` 20'� `- 54921-oovJ 65 �a ` �3 �2 Gl1 Go C, 1 �r7 FST t �t p1TT( THOMAS BERUBE e Ctu o �fTlvtn' ��assFSr4nelP##s ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN • Planninguarb JAESGARR X C JANE LUNDREGAN +' y �aam 7 -- Ctg �ull GERALD A GEORGE NO NORTHY WAK TADIUS SADOSKI 2. 10-71 RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 2 4 71 Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened this meeting at 7: 30 P.M. with Board Members Jane Lundregan, Tadius Sadoski, Michael Freeman, Thomas Berube, and George Nowak present, associate member Michael Chandler was also in attendance. Subdivision plans of Crescent Drive and Marion Road were presented for sig- natures of the Board members in behalf of the developer, Salem Acres„ Inc . , by Counselor George Vallis; these plans had been approved by this Board on October 1, 1970, following public hearings held by the Board. Five Form A applications with plans were submitted for endorsement as not requiring approval under subdivision control laws. The first of these showed Lots A-1 and A-2 at 37 Northend Avenue, presented in behalf of Rodney and Patricia Horton, owners; a copy of a variance from the applica- ble density requirements of the City Zoning ordinance, granted by the Board of Appeals accompanied the plan. On motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by •Mr. Berube , the Board voted unanimously to endorse this plan. The next plans showed land with existing structures at 181 and 183 Ocean Avenue , property of the Estate of Maria D' Isso, and were also accompanied by a copy of a decision of the Board of Appeals granting variances with regard to the density requirements of the Zoning ordinance. On motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by Mr. Berube, the Board voted to endorse these plans; Mr. Nowak was opposed to endorsing both of these plans. A plan submitted with a Form A application showing land on the easterly side of Bridge Street at the Salem-Beverly bridge, was presented for en- dorsement; Peter T. and Peter D. Clarizia owners, proposing to convey area shown as Lot A '.on said plan, and retaining area shown as Lot B. Mrs. Lun- dregan moved that this plan be endorsed, seconded by Mr. Freeman, and all in favor, it was voted to endorse this plan. The fifth Form A application and plan brought to this meeting were in be- half of the City of Salem, showing land on Bridge street , an area of 10518 square feet , the site of the old Bridge Street fire station building, abandoned during 1970. The purpose of this plan is to convey the area to Parker Brothers, owners of abutting properties. On motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by Mr. Berube, it was voted to endorse this plan with all members in favor, and so moved. - 2 - After attending to all of the plans submitted for endorsement, the first �order of business of this meeting was the approval and acceptance of the inutes of the last meeting on motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by Mr. Nowak, and all members in favor. Counselor George Vallis appeared and requested that Chairman Gerald McCarthy sign a release of Lots 4, 5, and 8 Dundee Street from the force and effect of conditions set forth in the Covenant between the City Planning Board and the previous owner, Angelo G. Trovas, dated April 2, 1964. Property has recently been conveyed to Michael Stasinos. Security in the amount of $1;:$00.00, a sum recommended by the City Engineer to insure proper comple- tion of work remaining to be done in this development, will be furnished to this Board. Upon presentation of said security, the Chairman will sign this release in behalf of the Board; this was the unanimous vote of the Board members. Recertification applications for the Workable program prepared by the Plan- ning Services Group and forwarded to Mr. McCarthy were distributed to the members. A discussion followed regarding the workable program and the comprehensive plan; it was suggested that all of the members bring their copies of the Blair reports to the next Board meeting. This being the final business of the evening, it was voted to adjourn at 9: 10 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, 1 CITY PLAN NG BOARD,-.Clerk. �,ca�Wp., ' H71♦}yyy}}} rr tt nyy� �nF�y y, �y* �♦ n} �+ THOMAS BERUBE 1 -`Q ty 1.1 �4li�Lil�� "4`U��KLN�L4LABBY BURNS 1 m 111 MICHAEL FREEMAN aarb JAMES GARRITY AZLTTIrtrt • vsa9 C JANE LUNDREG AN QUIT[ 7 -- U' tU �iall GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 2. 4.71 1. Form A application and plan - Rodney and Patricia Horton (Board of Appeals 37 37 Northend Avenue. 2. Form A application and plan - Estate of Maria D'Isso 181 Ocean Avenue. 3. Form A application and plan - Estate of Maria D'Isso 183 Ocean Avenue. 4. Form A application and plan - Peter T and Peter D Clarizia , Bridge Street. 5. Form A application and plan - City of Salem, Land on Bridge Street. Site of old Fire Station building. 6. Minutes of last meeting. • 7. Letter to George Vallis Re-Dundee Street, sufficient security 8. Joe Carter called about payment on his bill, dated 9. 3.78- 9. Request from Library of Harvard University Graduate School of Design, for copy of Historic Area Study of Salem, by Blair Assoc; bill sent for same . 10. Decisions on appeals before Board of Appeals in January. 11. Literature from Comm. of Mass. Dept . Community Affairs, covering five subjects; copies distributed to all members 12. Booklet on "Housing = An Open Systems Approach for Massachusetts" , also from Dept. of Community Affairs. 13- Copy of "Nation' s Cities" . 14. Copy :'Commerce Digest" ,. January, 1971- 15. Letter "Local Taxation" with return business reply card. CUM of $ateun Aussarhusetts (gag Pan �a1em,,lflHassacliasetts Q197D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE LU APPROVAL e+ � In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the C.- E_ N applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a a ✓a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- en g N mission for such determination. The notice shall be wJ attached to two copies of this Form A application. �, as The notice and both copies of the application must >- be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one t` c~—i copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -_--January 27= ------------19 1 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) __lz���us.�__the_�d[del_ir1_�llfls#ion_3ntr7s_on._3n_Pxi st;ng__pijic_____ .--was__fQcean A_y_Qnug�_ rt_existerLce }zeiole__tlLe_adQptian_Qf-_the_-7-nni.nsg_ordinances. A_v_ariance_has_been_granted by-the_Board of Appeals-,_--------------_----------_______-_ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner Estate_ofMaria- D'Isso ------------_--------------------------------------- Address clo-John_R._Serafini,_ Esq._,__126 Washington_Street,-_Salem__ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----Edwin_T_�_ BrUdz,yr1Ski.__-________________________________________-___ Address-----260__Lafay_ette_Street,__Sal_ems_Massachusett&_________.-____-___-___ 3. Deed of property records in -------Es Sex_South_District________-_-_ Registry Book ---------------------------------- Page ------------------------ 4. Location and Description of Property: ____#] 81__Qcean Avea e__(L�Ot_#121 ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ____________________--------------------------------------------------------------Saleml_Ma s--s-achu setts---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. E 2ae o Ma soSignature of Owner b�' -- - Address_c/__Q_12f;__ _a ' ton_Str-eet.r-_Sa f4,--Mass-.-------- Telephone Number-- -------744-0212_-__--_-__-_-----_____________---___ 1 OCEAN �� 1, • ' T � 't � �,i U. 7 i 7T3 i x/79 Lat/2/ IDv rl /.ef eQ i 8.3g 0` It r*I ^s Gafd/c'b 1 ,I� 'R �I p�� ` '` cif IIf �z1em �E.55ad u88fts THOMAS BERUBE i C" � ABBY BURNS T F MICHAEL FREEMAN ` C'�:? + 9 �j2tITYIIII� LICZXb JAMES GARRITY ' JANE LUNDREGAN Rpq S' ��0�2T1 T �t}�i �ullGEORGGERALD McCARTHY j TADIUS NOWAK 2. 1.71 TAYMO DSWEEI RAVMONDSWEENEV Mr. Augustine J. Toomey', City Clerk - City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Planning Board, held on January 21, 1971, it was voted to endorse "Approval Under Subdivi'si.on Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:Ix 1. Applicant - -Robert E. Warner ' 2. Location and Description - 37-39 Mason Street 3• Deed of . Property Records - Essex .South District Registry Very truly yours, GAN:cc 44;-o PLA ING BOARD, Clerk ad • •,S,GO]VITA �,Arn �•, fag of 'Salem, I' Bass ar4usP##s • � �2I211tT � �D2IY�1 (Eifg �Ul ttlenT, nssttel2useffs 01970 +. U cn 4 O NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO CC , c FORM "A"APPLICATIONS USee Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: -- Tarrauary S� 1 -- I City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir:- I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under,the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ------ Street —-- ---------------------- ------------------Salem,_ Mass. — --------- in Ward - ------------- - (insert street and street numbers here) SignatuYe ofOwner -----Rob rrt E_ _Weller------------------------------ - ry .amu Ci /Towri&State-----Salem ss-,-Ma - ---------------------------------------- Y U,., i ,r ✓? �, a chusetts---AL9Z-Q------------------------ Telephone Number --------------- 44-0212 r N `«C. �.•,.y .+r:.kt+ ' ,ire:. r±r.• 4' f " .cower r , fi 4 J z` ;> Ctu of $alem, Anssa*5e#ts f A w Planning Pourb CHp Mall Salem,.Anseachueetfe 01970 ' FORM A 2 APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT > ° OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE > APPROVAL , In accordance with provisions of Section 11-8, the trr W a qd ` applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a F Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- L�i © n i ,. mission for such determination. The notice shall be 1 LLi. attached to two copies of this Form A application. "¢ of M . C-) � The notice and both copies of the application,must �tx Ire."date stamped" by the City Clerk and then.one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the " a z; Planning Board by the Applicant. All notices-and ° applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in,ink. Salem, Mass., .....Ri uary8.----- ------19-7-1--- +k A To the Planning Board: f=s r The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not , ° "' , x constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and • state specific reasons) __because the Parcel in question was on an existing public ------------------ - ----- ---- ----- ------ , — . .........way (Mason Street) in existence before the adoption of the zoning 3 —• — —_ — --—— ' ordinances A variance has been granted by the Board of Appeals. — ON,,; 4 - _____ —. ____ --------__ _ ___ ---------_____________-_____-___ _ ,____. . _ ___ _ . 4" ' and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board Approval f i , , •Y'., under the Subdivision Control Law is not required, " Robert E Warner e a{. . . 1, Nantp of d eAdress.. 12 'SaltWall Lane r Salem, Massachusettsm ............... kyr 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor E. sex Survey ,, Address___ .:_47 Federal_Street,--Selem,-_Massachusetts ------------------- 3. Deed of property records in -----ESsex-..South District ---- _ :-_- Registry Book Pa — ge ------------ --- ------- 4. 4, ' Location and Description of Property; .X37 ,39 Mason,Street --Salem :Maes • .e -------•--•-------•---••-- - : ._.,-_ -„_„ - — ------------- s ____________________-- ------_------—. - ___ —,----------------------- _--____----- --------- __ _ _____ _ _____________ --__-. —____._ -___ - _ _ _- .' a S. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together:with the names of the Owners u s of the abutting lots. Robert E $i nature of Owner----••--- •------•-- Adress_ n Telephone Nuber =---- 744- 2 m 12 —------------------------------ +� �> ° ® ° ✓ O O p �C C ♦ o � � � �I SS t 9 +� SeDOsP 5oeosF 5 HF 5�-oe�sF S�;SF 5SF1{ SF • \�` h .w�0 ��.. .�.r.� .� Q SoO 5sa.o so-o Soo Soo S6.49 51 (�. ,fob d ROOSEVELT `t o so y B p ROAD ° C 0 5veo S '00.0 5 0 2 ° srw S F .•. .. X00 h -ly o lie m . 60 c + � a i Q , p 5ao3F 1� h v ��� ' Lv? HBof+ tl'f8/ � 4'i5a X1660 oo.o 6 o so.aTo-o so.o soo so: _�'o: P �' o ao SF 'oo.0 0 a- s b10 00.o O 00 O4_5602 o soo yo ° c /Z9.0 � °y 5wo Sr ToTaL Ptd,% N i s CC toTo 6-6 16T, are 5"o 1. 90 >Z ��sF as R-C/YA4 _ R� 5 a. B Lei& dcQ *'ETWttN �'�o� R3QpoSF o 0 �f J. I �o o V! r A4 u_,y o o /o $ _ 5•��° 5�`F R o.q 00 0 GoTo ave - fit �,. ° ° �• SSF ' •9'O.p 4b ♦ _O O° O O _O S�c:'p„S F O ps � 3 .o o , "n3 FARLEY, SERAFINI Ek FARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW • 126 WASHINGTON STREET JAMES E.FARLEY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI RICHARD P. FARLEY TELEPHONE 744-0212 January 8, 1971 Planning Board City of Salem City Hall Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Attention of: Mrs . Chris Callahan Dear Chris: Enclosed please find two copies of Form "A" and the Notice to be attached, together with the plan, which I would like to have presented at the next meeting of the Planning Board for approval. Very truly yours, John Serafini, Esquire JRS/lak Enclosures i f hf/fS0A1 STREET 5P'k� 5 'ka 5P'k` 9 .... \ ,7p Ad,00 0 ia�e 'qa'. X39 q� h % IM Af A A Q, A=498Srsf. q-S249-sF .• 54.9 49� OF oma' ROBERT N� z B. a� BOWMAN %. w Q�Proro/under f/��Su6dirrsio� No. 18887 Loofro/ Coss r�otic�aiic�'urx�er �FcMTS�` O C�74P.41414 Sec.B/A. lgNs�avw��� SALEM PLANK/A/G gOq,PO PL AW of LAND 14 in SAIL.E�if! Property of - ,Pober>` W ine� Scale: /"a 40' No% /2, /970 G ESSEX SileVEY SERVICE AC. 47 Federal Sl,-eel Sale, So77 r • J/J 7�'warD of CAPPral WILLIAM F. A,,,,!„'r DECISION ON PETITION OF ROBERT E. WARNER FOR VARIANCE I`ROM APPL.I:CABLE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SALEM ZOA'I:NG ORDINANCE AFFECTING EXISTING DWELLINGS JOnN M. OIIA V. 3R Alt I HVl, LAMILCUUB AT 37-39 MASON STREET. „s ,,. i.. TANCH J. NORMA. VIO.C.. JR. Petitioner through Counselor Join R. Serafini appealed to the Board o , Appeals for a variance from the applicable density requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance aff.,cti.nr existing structures at 37-39 Mason Street which had been purchased as one parcel. A 'h6aringwas held on this appeal on December 21, 1970, pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to the petitioner, his attorney, board members, abutters , and others and advertisements published in the Salem Evening Ne�•js advising , of this hearing. Counselor Serafini appeared for the petitioner and stated the case ; his j client had purchased this property as one parcel, and wishes to transfer #37 Mason Street and #39 Mason Street separately; both buildings have existed on this lot of .land for well over fifty years; due to °a new Zoning . Ordinance adopted in 1965 variances are required from the . appli- cable density requirements of said Ordinance affecting lot area , lot width and front and side yard setbacks. Board members present at this hearing were Mr. Tanch, Mr. Labrecque, Mr. Abbott and Mr. Welch; member unable to attend were Mr. Gray, Mr.Doyle , and Mr. Boulger. I No one appeared in opposition. The Board found on the basis of evidence that there had been no altera- tions , extensions or additions since the adoption of the zoning ordinance, and that the area remained substantially the same prior to the adoption of the ordinance in 1965, and further found as a fact that the proposed division of the lot and the transfer of the separate r> ” als would still leave each lot with an area large enough to be compat with the dwel- ling house. The Board therefore unanimously voted to grant the variances requested so as to permit the transfer of numbers 37 and 39 Mason Street as sepa- rate parcels. APPEAL GRANTED AS REQUESTED. BOARD OF APPEALS, SSVW 'W3lVS Acting Secretajx,, 3�Id�0 $J�r17�:1 dli� 01. Intl CO 03AI303a �,gOS01EG "Tittu of wale i, aesat4nutts Planning Pnarb Q:itv pull ,�ttleu,,�lassttcltuseifs A197A !� W w _V U_ . C+ U_N > ,< NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO en M FORM "A"APPLICATIONS ;L c See Form "A" applications for V) n complete instructions for filing. Lt " All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: __ Februa_ _2 , 1971 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ---- ------------------—------------------------------ __------------------------------------------------ in Ward ----------------------------------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) Pete T. nd Peter 1 . Cl ari is Signature.of OwnerbY_ �? ��,1_: Lti __ ___ Street Address Q/cz_J. 6-W,a ahingtQri_3fr�flt,_8 City/Town&State----------------Maks — —— — — --------------------- - Telephone Number --- 744-0212----------------------------- • • �T . ANiNLH���iN FA�NiV Aalem, Aussachusetts 01979 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT A OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE o m APPROVAL yko oQ In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the :Y applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a co LU J� Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- �r �Q mission for such determination. The notice shall be >(A attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must t+. be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ------February_2...............19.71__- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. 11-A and state specific reasons) -Peter_T._and Peter_D_._Clarizia_own Lot A and_Lot__B------TheX_-- are_transferring Lot A. It_is_desired_to_have the plan_endorsed so_that_it_B__ be recorded with the Deed The area--in--question fronts s--on--a-a-public_way.------ -------- --------- - - ------- - - - Bridge Street, Salem,Massachusetts, and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ---------P_atex_TL_-ancL-PEtEr_-D_-_Clarizia----------------------------------------_---- Address---0/0 --------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _____Robert B._Bowman,_ Essex_Ssrvey__Seryice�__Irlc_._ Address Federal_Street,__Saleml- Massachusett S ----------------------------- 3. _____--_ _3. Deed of property records in -------- ___ Essex South District -----_--_ Registry -------- --------- -------- Book ------------------------------------ -- Page -------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: B--r-id-g --- treet,- m. M _ Saleass--------------------------- P P Y� -- --- ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners Peter T. and Peter D. Clarizia, b of the abutting lots. y: � Signature of Owner---------= "��t -�1'�iC - �.� --•, j Address___c/o_ 126 Washington_StreetAleml_Mass 744-0212 TelephoneNumber --- ----- ----- ---- - --- - - ----------------------------------- QJ tv of Salem, gassar4usetts (Eitg Pall �alear,,ARassaclp:setts D1970 FORM A tCZ u QMH APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT i° OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE LU APPROVAL �LU In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the c�Q applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a . y Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., --------- ebruai'lt_2*-------------197-L__ To the Planning Board; The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) __P_etec_T.__and_Peter_-D.__Clarizia-mmn_IALA_and_-Lot_B.----They-__ are-transferrin$-I.atAti__I -is_siesirod_lfl_haYe_the_,phn_sndm-ed-ao that_St_may_ he_recordedl_with_the_Daesl.____The_ac��_in__�us�tion Il[Qntta__QrL�_& bli retay�_______ Hridge_,gtreet._Salem.__Ma�r�ahusett -------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner _P_etex_T.__and-PSLu-.D..__Cladzia,-----------------------------------_------------------- Address c1Q_l2__5 htesln9ton Street.-_Salem1_Ma$s,------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----Robmwt_$.-Ilo tman,-Ess"--Surygy--Setvica_r__I}g,-._ Address-----Fedaral_Ptreet,Salem,__Masesohusett&________________________________-- 3. Deed of property records in -----FimeK_$ouch_Dlstriet----------------------Registry Book --------------------------------------- Page -------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _________ ,----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the�ppIan twe er wi the amen(?f th Owners of the abutting lots. Peter Tz ariCi ete/i �. C�arizia, by: Signature of Owner-------- - Address-P/P-126_Washington-Street,_Salem, Maes.-------_ Telephone Number _________________ __744-0212 �I Ji h / fie \ m C h , h� 15, �\ Q } li t PD cm ' r^ �Yll i Qj V ' C ,?i3QQ u n .,moo � Sic � � A,oPrava/ under the Sabdivision y -ted Q Co�t�o/ (ory nod reQuired u.�dPr 0� ChQP. 4/ G' L. Secel fP \�V� � .; SALEM P,�gNN/NG BOgrt.'O O i•pipe Q l 407- 4 A17, Z3 r; i r� N OK r sN i M\9 ' �"02 ROBERT 'c I s oW. B.BOWMAN ti b No. 18887 �O/t/lIQT� ✓I: ! 1y � I�GrSTER�p� �__ N � tJ U I PLAN o f LAND SAL EM, /•• � PrPpored for f Peter Ty Peter D, C/orijio � o 19740 3� 5 ESSEX SURVEY SEeWeE /NC. / 47 Fede,-a/ Sheet So/em i 3CeGS _ _ i i { _1 j ' `_ �� �i 1 j �I i . � i 1 ,, �dt H' ' S l �; � . . ,. �t . , : ,. ,�.� � [ i @lift pall �ulem, �lassuc!lusetis Q197Q FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL liZz W In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the p 4 applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a j a o uj Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- , h ,c mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. cep j The notice and both copies of the application must ca Y Y ti be "date stamped" b the Cit Clerk and then one Q copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the V Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. 1 71 Salem, Mass., ------j, ----- _anuary_-25�"-------------19------ To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and • state specific reasons) __ each lot on petitioner's plan has adequate frontage on a______-_- ___public_way_as-per_sariance_grantec -bg_Boar4-of_e ipea!s,--3-_capy_of vvl9,Ph-4s------------ _-Etta_shed_hemedto-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination;and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner .....Rodney_and Patrieia_D._Horton -----—--------------------—___ Address ------37 Northend- -Avenue, Salem - - ---- --- ------- -------- --------- ------- -- ------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -----Essex_Survey_Service,_ Inc•____________________________________ Address_ 47 Federal Street,SAlem ------------- ----------- --------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ------Essex_South District ___-Registry Book ---- 5670 — ---- Page III------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Prope ; __Situated on Northend Avenue in Salem, beings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lots A and A as shown on a pan entitled "Plan of Land in Salem, property of ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rodney and Patricia D• Horton, Scale 1"=20; Sept•_21,__1970,_Esaex Surv_�y__S_ fee, lot A on said plan 89:57 feet; Southeasterlyb land now or former) of Sa to ly_by Inc• LotAybounded Northwester) b Nortnend Avenue 45.16 ft• 8dorthea ---------------- -- - --- --- -- - - --- ---- - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------ - - ---- - -- - - -- - 58.31 feet; and Southwesterly by land now or formerly of Robert E. Maguire 90:67 Beet. Ivf AY-boualed NortT�westerl — — y b3' Northend A.ve• 53.55 feet; Northeasterly by land now or IormerIy of Savageau 83 e(i feet; Southeaete-rIy by Tand riow or formerly of Janard and Tand now or Yoimerty oP Savoy 5330 beef; Sonttiaesteily Tiy lot AZ 99,.57 feet . -- —— — -- — -------------------------------------------- 5. i • i All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Pan together wi the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. � ` / Signature of Owner l/_ _ r_ __ --- 4/j- CR . I Address------ 37 Northead Avenue, Salem, Mass. 01970 Telephone Number ----- 746-4380-------------------------------------------------- I RE +. i ,.r�..� �t �,ic��:._.t� C�„c<:c•.7:,tLs��:3L��1,'� Lei':. :':AS S. vn u+nln F. nGnoTT 7)Ty O'_-[<;=i:ODi PE'PS.TI ON Or. ROD*;EY AND PATP.ICIA IIO P.TOIN J A:II:: H, II OU LC,.-n ucr..,; r, (J0YLe jai'. !':':i:.LA?'1:;.� ON LOT AREA , - LOT WIDTH, FRONT AND . c ;, n, nI'LIC.IBLE TOTiXISTI\G STRUCTURE 0\ nll(I+VII Lni.11f CJVL .• TnI:MH 0' . 1 . Ai•i � 'P,CPOScD STRUCTURE FOR LOT A-2 AS. J. NORMAN WELCH, JR. ' I0''.�bT . ON OF LAND ON ATORTHEND AVEATUE. i.:iorters a II;,es�.led to tl; � fQ� o� Q9� yh `VVV p� �.yyAe o� A�Ea=X134 s�' had 9Q�` _/ C�`�c ��/iui' ✓. �/�aryoref /Yf. So✓oy Allee k . �'o6erf E /�cs9uiie Appromo/ under fhPLAN of LAND e Subdivision 117Con i'ro/ Law fiot required, under Chvot 4/, G. L . ser. d/ P S,QL EM SALEM pL A NN/N6 BOARO `` t , Property of '44\f"�lel Scale: /"=24" SeRl 2/, !9740 ESSEX SIJ.eVEY SERV/CE /NC. Da fe• 47 FBdera/ 5>`ieef So%m 21.39 CCU of '$ttfrm' 'Mttssar4use##s • Planning 31nttrd atite ABU �alem, ,i�Rassttcltasetfs II197II :h N NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO LJJI w 7 nY FORM"A"APPLICATIONS w WW See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. y N All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. ... Date: ----F®bruary_-4,c---1971 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at --on--$ridge--fit-.---ad jHCEIIt--tO Farkex--Brothers--containing/l ' 518A& (insert street and street numbers here) CITY OF ALEM Signature of Owner $3r - - -------- - -- C ty SO11Ci Y Street Address --------7-0__Ideehington At- A- ®m------------------------- City/Town&State------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number ------------- 744-2172------------------------------------------------- • Ctu of �$Ukm, 'fflusfarhuortts Planning Poarb Cilg xall Salem, lassachusetfs D1979 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT W OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE ^' CJ APPROVAL w o nom_ o in accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the ,n 4 applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a w N Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- C..) J w mission for such determination. The notice shall be CC -r attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must & be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ---------------Yebruary--4 ---197-1--- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and istate specific reasons) thia-_Prn�lerY�t__frOnts__�n_BYisiQe__8x ___i$- kte__ptoYty wher the f re t tion w a f rmerl 1 ated and w Bch a now to be con- veye by C-t p u&Bra�llee� . �ot � naw �tho-ig�e �1cmveyed-�o-a��ecent-;-viand--owner � iotsa__ s__P rkezthe trac 'o e`y�n -Lote$Aaan Ston i s P�ariJi,k stIngIrt ereo so, upon--#t-4-or---a--, rest--manV­-year-s--a edst#ng -subdivislen--con o-1 i� Salem and herewith submits said plan For a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner -----City-o£-Sdlem------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address -----fialem.---Mass.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -------Ralph_W.__Tedford,_ City__Engineer---------------- Address -_-- ____ _Address_ _________ _City Hell, Selem,_ Maes._ 3. Deed of property records in --------------------------------------------------------------------Registry Book ---------------------------------------- Page ------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: A__,parr_el__nf__land---On_BSiflg@_$x.--- $j-acent to Parker Brothers and consisting of 10, 518 sq. ft. �atnwa_Qorpore buildings_ and rrh-iis now atrandd�ing on Lot AOvone cb�tufildfing the--last--e ntence_ n_-the-- iaitioa_o a auhdiv�s re �ia li` � Chapfer 41 Section 81L, thiedoesnotconstituteasubdivision. Thebuilding on Lot_A_ieto bdemlshed__by_thegrantee. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with t a es of the Owners of the abutting lots. CITY A Signature of Owner------BYC SOli OI Address---------------------_7.0__W tan__St,,___ alem_______------ 744-2172 Telephone Number ----------------------------------------------------- • PARKER BROTHERS 1 NC. N lb�� COMM. OF MASS. ' 54.50` w o 158.09` e i ?^ N 73-03- E N 74-16-30 E ^ 1 ze4 oTot;7v, cPAtw rn NO." POLE STREET ' AT f LOT A.' '` N m LOT B. o - �n_ "o PARKER BROTHERS z` y .`r CI TY F SALEM INC. S.F 10518 AREA .. � AREA 21174 S.fy �P • I toll S 7t-4 Q W 154.90' - �., _ 249.52 ----_— f Iry BRIDGE ,STREET " Approval under fhe subd vision Cflnfrol Law nnf required . LAND OF CITY OF SALEM S'% /em 9 �yh � 4 BRIDGE STREET y SALEM, MASS. MARCH 1,970 SCALE 1"=40' CtTY ENGWEA R +y� �y}r y� .��F��}�{►y�¢¢ fit¢ }}Q THOMAS BERUBE t _`O �Tl yl ♦•L �Eil�� "4lGl�J7.>' tlii��44Y ABBY BURNS e(yA. 7 MICHAEL FREEMAN ;y„+ a �]gyAttxtntIT "g nMXjl JAMES GARRITY 'H C JANE LUNDREGAN • �� �:' y �T �COrit 7 -- CtV �iNOBII GERALD A GEORGE NORTHY WAK CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 2. 18. 21 RADIUSRAYMONDDSSWEEWEEI NEY In addition to Chairman Gerald McCarthy who opened this meeting at 7: 30 P.M. , Board Members James Garrity, George Nowak, Jane Lundregan, Michael Freeman and Raymond Sweeney were present. i A Form A application and plan showing three lots with existing structures at Essex Street and Hawthorne Boulevard were presented for endorsement by Richard Farley, Counsel for Alice Donovan, Mary Reardon, and Thomas Flynn. Mr. Farley explained that the Board of Appeals had granted a variance from the applicable terms of the Zoning Ordinance with regard to lot size, lot width, and setback requirements. Mr. Nowak moved that the Board en- dorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law; Mr. Sweeney moved that the motion be amended to the effect that the plan be endorsed on the basis of the Board of Appeals decision and a legend stating this be inscribed on the linen; this amended motion, sec- onded by Mr. Garrity, with all in favor was voted approved, and the linen endorsed. On motion of Mr. Nowak, seconded by Mr. Freeman, the Board voted unarii- mously to approve and accept the minutes of the last meeting. • The next item of business was a copy of a letter sent to Carter & Towers Corporation, regarding corrections to be made in the City Zoning Map, re- cently prepared by Mr. Joseph Carter. Notices of hearings to be held on petitions to the Board of Appeals were read to this meeting. Miscellaneous literature received by the Board, copies of all of which were distributed to the members was discussed. Chairman Gerald McCarthy will take care of a questionnaire received by the Board relating to Urban Data Service for a publication called Municipal Year Book. The members then discussed the Comprehensive Plan prepared by Blair Assoc- iates in their studies of the City in 1963, with a view towards updating this plan. As the supply of copies of this particular study has been ex- hausted, a request will be made of the publishers with regard to the cost of purchasing an additional one hundred copies. Having completed the business brought to this meeting, the Board voted to adjourn at 8: 46 P.M. Respectfully submitted, t'cn��6_1 I• P_- Ja� CLERK �♦++yy}} }r yy, ��1��y�{►y,¢Q p t�♦¢ }}Q THOMAS BERUBE ti 11 �.L ��El«� "4�GlS�i.>' LIINT..E44Y ABBY BURNS H `�D !! MICHAEL FREEMAN IFIYTYtiTt� II2TTD JAMES GARRITY r v„ e9 JANE LUNDREGAN i • p` F tl:e � f'ruveo�b �RDOriT 7 -- CtV Pull GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 2.18.71 1. Form A application and plan, Reardon, Little and Donovan, land located at Essex Street and Hathorne Boulevard. 2. Minutes of last meeting. 3. Letter to Joe Carter about map changes. 4. Notices of next Appeals Board hearing. 5. Bulletin from Essex Agricultural & Technical Institute 6. Questionnaire - Municipal Year Book - Urban Data Service. 7. Calendar of Seminars in Planning. • 8. Regional report "Special Report" - M. A. P. C . 9. M.A.P.C. - Regional Report February, 1971. 10. Review and discussion of Blair Studies. • ¢ t�♦C } G THOMAS BERUBE Titu of FIIEm, C assar4useff8 ABBY BURNS )) MICHAEL FREEMAN es JAMES GARRITY •z . /' Iunniz�y� 7�iturD / ? C JANE LUNDREGAN 7 -- lEItU dill GERALD A GEORGE NO NORTHY WAK TADJUSSADOSKI CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 2 . 18. 71 RAYMOND ND SSWEEWEENEY In addition to Chairman Gerald McCarthy who opened this meeting at `7e30 P.M. , Board Members James Garrity, George Nowak, ,Jane Lundregan, Michael Freeman and Raymond Sweeney were present. A Form A application and plan showing three lots with existing structures at Essex Street and Hawthorne Boulevard were presented for endorsement by Richard Farley, Counsel for Alice Donovan, Mary Reardon, and Thomas' Flynn. Mr. Farley explained that the Board of Appeals had granted a variance from the applicable terms of the Zoning Ordinance with regard to lot size, lot width, and setback requirements. Mr. Nowak moved that the Board en- dorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law; Mr. Sweeney moved that the motion be amended to the effect that the plan be endorsed on the basis of the Board of Appeals decision and a legend stating this be inscribed on the linen; this amended motion, sec- onded by Mr. Garrity, with all in favor was voted approved, and the linen endorsed. On motion of Mr. Nowak, seconded by Mr. Freeman, the Board voted unani- mously to approve and accept the minutes of the last meeting. The next item of business was a copy of a letter sent to Carter & Towers Corporation, regarding corrections to be made in the City Zoning Map, re- cently prepared by Mr. Joseph Carter. Notices of hearings to be held on petitions to the Board of Appeals were read to this meeting. Miscellaneous literature received by the Board, copies of all. of which were distributed, to the members was discussed. Chairman Gerald McCarthy will take care of a questionnaire received by the Board relating to Urban Data Service for a publication called Municipal Year Book. The members then discussed the Comprehensive Plan prepared by Blair Assoc— iates in their studies of the City in 1963, with a view towards updating this plan. As the supply of copies of this particular study has been ex- hausted, a request will be made of the publishers with regard to the cost of purchasing an additional one hundred copies. Having completed the business brought to this meeting, the Board voted to adjourn at 8: 46 P.M. Respectfully submitted, i0 CLERK �P CtU o f Satan �J assar4usrtts THOMAS BERUBE �'� �' lj t• iJ�'y Lill) T�(i LA D L 4i ,(,jY ABBY BURNS r MICHAEL FREEMAN ( JAMES GARRITY • ir. y �. IMITYIIYIgQGtrb JANE LUNDREGAN �ROUrit 7 -- CtV pall GEORGE A GEORGE NO NORTHY WAK MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 3.4. 71 TADIUSSADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gerald T. McCarthy at 7: 30 P.M. , with Board Members, Mrs. Burns, Mrs. Lundregan, Mr. Sadoski, Mr. Nowak, Mr. Berube and non-voting member Mr. Chandler present. On motion of Mrs . Burns, the Board voted unanimously to approve and accept the minutes of the last meeting. Mrs. Burns spoke about photographic slides with regard to the proposed I-95 connector routes, the property of a group opposed to the construction of these roads . Mrs. Burns proposed that the slides be viewed by the Board as a group. Members agreed to the proposal and Mrs. Burns will arrange to have these shown at the next meeting of this Board, to be held on March 186. 40 letter from Mr. Mort Braun of the Planning Services Group was read to the meeting; this had to do with the renewal of the contract between this Board and the Planning Services Group in relation to the proparation of the Work- able Program and the Capital Improvements Program. Mr. McCarthy addressed the Board, stating he had spoken with Mayor Zoll about updating of the Com- prehensive Plan of the City; he further stated that Mr. Florini had advised the Board with regard to updating the existing plan. The Capital Improve- ments program will have to be done this year as will the Workable Program. On motion of Mrs. Lundregan, it was voted to request that Mr. Braun submit a new contract. As far as the Comprehensive Plan is concerned, it was felt the Board could get in touch with Mr. Florini and the Planning Council also, and get estimates of what they would charge . Meeting adjourned at 8: 30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, • CITY PLAN ING BOARD, - Clerk ` n �' ♦ yy, qnF�� !fir y}`C �q + r THOMAS BERUBE • "rY ,�+s 2, (g11t'q+yj of �[A�L4Ll� C."Y�CtJ�cALL�Lt�L.L�L ABBY BURNS T MICHAEL FREEMAN • ��' '" ,a - - funning ` Lt�tTD JAMES GARRITY JANE LUNDREGAN r�'•-ures."r 'ZppIIL 7 __ �It[t ' , TZll GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI 2. 10- 71 • to• 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY Mr. Augustine J. Toomeyy City Clerk - City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: . At a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Planning Board, held on February 4, 1971, it was voted to endorse "Approval Under Subdivis- ion Control Law Not Required" ion the following described plan: 1 . Applicant - Estate of Maria D' Isso, c/o John R. Serafini, Esq. , 2. Location and Description - #183 Ocean Avenue (Lot #119) 9 - Deed of Property records in Essex South District ' Registry very truly yours, GAN:cc CITY PLA NG BOARD, Clerk °o . I I i I i Glee ,'fall Isalem, �lassachusdts II397D FORM A ems- y APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT vi OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL a 7 M . '='�= In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the N y W applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a W Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- - Pe ` ' ry mission for such determination. The notice shall be co attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., - --January_Z7.................Iii------ To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) -------hflcausQ__tha_tzar_mel_in_quflsiifln_-was_on_an_Existing__public way (Ocean_Av_enue)__in_existence before_the_adoption_of_the_zoning-ordin aces A. variance has been granted_by__the Board of Appeals __-______________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner Estate of Maria_D'Isso Address -c/o-John R. Serafini, Esq. , _126_Washington_ St._,__Salem_i____ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ______Edwin T.__Brudzyn-s--k ___-------------------------------___________ Address__ 260 Lafayette_Street,_Salem_,_ Massachusetts_____ --------------- 3. Deed of property records in _Fs&Q _SOLith_I)istrlct-_________.______________Registry Book ---------------------------------- Page -------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -----#183.Ocean Avenue (Lot $_119) - - -- --------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown a lan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. stat o Mar' 'Is o, Signature of Owner-by-- - �- -------- -- - -- 0- — c/o 126 ington Street, Sale -________. Address-------- ---------- - Telephone Number ---------------7-44-_021.9--------------------------------------- t� Ls"ivo �STi9TE �F /W,, W 0isso { g167111 =2aA7, .0EC./990 E ' 14 If 11 UZY Nt'.nl �q tiv s�Ha 1 � I zd✓O/e Lor�'ii9 ,'I VOIJ 0 e'f-uX 1 9 tw t E71// PL ANN/NG' BOi9R0 1�� 1 � Y� s Xyj{ tYIA{"�1 rlnyy , N"fli 4QQy* yNnT A UBE ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN �'"^' IMITYTTYI "1aMX� JAMES GARRITY • vs � 'H D CJANE LUNDREGAN �Rvvm: 7 -- TRU �iMlf GERALD MCCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI 3. 30- 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES - - - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - - 3. 18. 71 The meeting began informally at 7: 30 P.M. Present- were Abigail Burns, James Garrity, George Nowak, Michael Freeman, Jane Lundregan, Thomas Berube and Gerald McCarthy. Representatives of the North Shore Committee on Transportation, headed by Mr. Wm. Burns and Mr. George P. Gauthier presented slides and an accompanying dialogue designed to graphically illustrate the impact that Route I-95 Connectors would have on the City of Salem regarding population, housing, commercial and industrial development , employment , physical disruption and the direct and indirect costs to the City. • They presented possible alternatives to the roads. The members of the committee pointed out that they were a group of interested citizens and that they were not being subsidized by any special interest groups and that their main objective was to have the entire matter studied at greater length to be sure that all possible avenues of alternative trans- portation had been exhausted before the present plan became a reality. The meeting was formally called to order at 8: 20 P.M. The reading of the minutes 'from the last meeting was waived, all members having read them, ,and they were accepted as presented. Mr. Joseph Carter of Carter & Towers appeared with the new zoning map. He had the recommended changes from the City Engineer, Mr. Ralph Tedford and pointed out that some of the changes requested were new and should • not be considered part of his contract . On motion made by James .Garrity I 2 • and duly seconded and unanimously voted, it was moved that the necessary changes to complete the zoning map be made , and an. additional one hundred dollars be appropriated for this purpose . Gerald McCarthy reported that he had discussed a new contract with Mort Braun of the Planning Services Group, and it was decided that he would submit a contract substantially the same as last year. It would include work on the Capital Improvements Program, Workable Program, and possible zoning changes based upon the amount of time spent on these items. Any work on a Comprehensive Plan would involve a separate contract . The contract should be available at our next meeting. It was moved that.,a letter should be sent to our State representatives to vote yes on Bill H522 to make outdoor advertising subject to local zoning ordinances, and the Massachusetts Roadside Council should be con- tacted for a model zoning ordinance for outdoor advertising. The meeting was adjourned at 9: 25 P.M. Respectfully submitted , CITY PI NNING BO RD, Clerk 9 i yN.CO,Ay111L�� NNN\,TI p} yy}} ,y ..yy nnyp�ypTHOMASBER IIoj (.Blem, C S t� us�fts ' ABBY BURNSLIBE X I - MICHAEL FRE-MAN n X n JAMES GARRITV 7 '' Iurinin, 'nrb • �\\? _ - JANE LU ND REGAN 7 -- CtOiull GERALD McCARTHV GEORGE NOWAK TAOIUSSADOSKI 2, 22,71 RAYMOND SWEENEY Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, . City Clerk - City Hall , Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At ' a regularly sdheduled meeting of the City Planning Board held on February 18, 1971, it was voted to endorse "Approval Under Subdiv- ision Control Law Not Required" •on the following described plan: 1 . Applicant - Mary A. Reardon, Thomas F. Flynn and Alice H. Donovan 2. Location and Description ,- Lots #1 , #2, and #3 at the corner of Essex 'Street ,and Hawthorne Boulevard • ` 3._.__ Deed of Property records in Essex ' South District registry Book 5210 Page 46 Very truly ,yours, GAN: cc CITY PL . NING BOARD - Clerk , I , 1 , i ,caws RE CFI((��tt++ 9 of 1*a1e 1 �tSSFSC itSP S FED IO 3 43 PN '11lttrulinguxrb CITY Cl.tkV. OFFICE CHU Pau SALEM. MASS. �[assacfiasdts Ole?a FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -----Febrpasy_9,-----------19-71-- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) A1.1threeIotsare_ Ioeated-on _ !!__appTOved_-street___ Which Was in existence prior to the adoption of the sub-division control law in Salem. -------------------------------------- ------------------------- - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owners_ 14ary A . Reardon , Thomas F. a__nd Alice H. Donovan A4 AigTiIaiia Ave. , FlynnSalem, ytas$. , 3d Gu-t f e Plit I NeW AddresA-9"Loaden-t---Genn -&--5--M,ir--#an-'Re--.---tela rb-le#ee d @las EDWIN_ —_ _ -_ T. BRODZYNSKI- -_ __ _------------------------------ spe- a�3bely. 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _•__-_ _- -_ _- - -r�----- --___-._ Address 260_ Lafay0to.Q_S-t--reetl_Salem.-_Massachusetts___-_- _-__-_ _ -- 3. Deed of property records in -- EsseX__South__ - ---------- Di strict - Registry Book ----5210 - ---- Page -------46------------------- 4. Location and Description of Proper : Ail three lots are ad oinIn With_ Lot ttl , being 30cated at the corner of Essex Street and Hawthorne Boulevard, containing a building and 2,881__square- __feat. Lo ----- 2 is located at 43 ------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Hawthorne Boulevard with a building thereon and contains 2, 190 square feet. Lot 93, with a building-_thereon,_ is located at #5 Hawthorne Boulevard, and contains 2,671 square feet . ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. f y- /--/ - Signature of 0 erZ D �_��- "�Q81�--/---�tl3af �- ._,_ l/ �'`}� ? j/ / / C/ Address - �4-f Wo_ tel ------- Telephone Telephone Number _ z 6 ems: ��y� �9L/CE H. Oon/o✓f+N ET AGS ss-/7/9wTh'O/PNE BG YO -sem FM MASS, x SY•✓�LE/////i�,,.! =zo OcT. /970 , G .ptxsYs e i� T. BRUJ.'YNSKI .1 h 4 y - 4+0'SUN '' b ; j/o✓�ca - c S asA? 77-Cl �► Lor�-� e N Zo7- * e Lor ''V/ < = 0/50 o , q 7730 •... .••• - ----__ _ /yfIyVTNORNE B'L '1/O- - - �9�,� ,vvo/uno�Pi- Sub di.�•s+Dn�� °`. r THOMAS BER o �$aje , �4 zjssar4usejjz ABBY BURNS UBE y: 7 MICHAEL FREEMAN • e Planning c uttrD JAMES GARRITY JANE LUNDREG AN 7 -- �tt�lUll GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI 4.22.71 RAYMOND SWEENEY CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING APRIL 15, 1971 Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened the meeting at 7:30 P.M. with Board Mem- bers Thomas Berube, Abigail Burns, Michael Freeman, Jane Lundregan, and George Nowak present. Motion was entertained to waive reading of the minutes of the previous meeting and to accept and approve same as copies had been forwarded to all members prior to this meeting, and by unanimous vote , motion was adopted. • A letter from Carter & Tower, Engineers who had prepared the new City Zoning map was read, referring to prices for reproducing maps in volume. Board voted unanimously to order 1000 copies printed for resale. With regard to the letter to the City Solicitor seeking his counsel as to the proper procedure to follow in filling in the general form status inquiry from a bonding company which provided-'security for satis- factory completion of work in the Peter Road area , the Chairman stated he had discussed this with the City Solicitor. His advice was to con- tact the developer. Michael Freeman moved that the Board fill out the form and send a copy to Mr. Hyman Marcus and Building Enterprises, Inc. , the developer together with a letter stating that "if they wish to discuss the matter further, they may appear at the next Board meeting; motion seconded, all in favor, and so voted approved. • A copy of proposed state legislation with regard to installation of signs in this Commonwealth was received, and it was suggested copies be made �I 2 _ and sent to all members. The proposed by-laws were presented by the com- mittee on outdoor advertising which appears to have done a thorough re- search on the subject and produced a very satisfactory recommendation. Questionnaire received from International City Management Association will be completed by Abby Burns and returned to the association. It was brought out at this meeting that the City Councillors had reduced the amount of the budget requested by the Board •f6r the year from $15,000. to $80250. ; and further, the Council had reduced the proposed Planning Department budget from $46,020. 55 to $19000.00. This was the final business of the evening, and the meeting was adjourned at 8: 30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITIf PL N NG BOARD,' Clerk • - 2 - •and sent to all members. The proposed by-laws were presented by the com- mittee on outdoor advertising which appears to have done a thorough re- search on the subject and produced a very satisfactory recommendation. A questionnaire received from International City Management Association will be completed by Abby Burns and returned to the association. It was brought out at this meeting that the City Councillors had reduced the amount of the budget requested by the Board for the year from $15,000. to $8,250.00; and further, the Council had reduced the proposed Planning Department budget from $46,U20. 55 to $19000.00. The matter of the annual dinner meeting of the Board was discussed, and it was decided that on the first Saturday in May, the members and their guests would dine at the Commodore Restaurant in Beverly. This was the final business of the evening, and the meeting was adjourned •at 8: 3U P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk • ,cavi • rl � ' THOMAS 01ijU of �$ajci , v"U I assar4usetts ABBY BURNS BERUBE "J 1. MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY • 1M1IYiIStII2IT�1 JANE LUNDREG AN cL.uvh'. y i OUIri 7 -- (fitu �iflU GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 4. 15. 71 1. Minutes of last meeting. 2. Letter from Carter & Towers re- printing copies of zoning map. 3. Board' s letter to Joe Carter enclosing payment to date. 4. Board' s letter to City Solicitor re-Peter Road problems.';' 5. Letter in reply from Rep. O'Donnell re- Outdoor advertising. 6. Copy of suggested sign by-law. 7. Questionnaire from International City Management Assoc. 8. Council Order cutting Board budget nearly exactly in half. 9. Council Order cutting planning department budget to $1,000.00. 10. Letter from Dept. Community Affairs Re; -Planned Unit Development. 11. Report of B-Law committe of Mass. Federation of Planning Boards. 12. Newsletter "Planning and Zoning" Mass. Federation Planning Boards . 13. Regional Report, Metropolitan area planning council. 14. Annual report of Board for City Documents. 15. Copy of Agenda April 26th Board of Appeals hearing. 16. Copies of decisions on recent Appeal Board petitions. 17. Copy of contract for Consultants ' services for 1970 for comparison with contract for 1971. v � „ycawlri, ' `P T}}}}��� 7r' �{1/nyy� �y �}*{y.��♦ THOMAS BERUBE l.tu o Uljc �1' ".Y/assar 1. seffs ABBY BURNS ` 7 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN • A �]ygIMYtYITk[j� "A varb JAMES GARRITV JANE LUNDREGAN 7 -- (QitU �iaII GERALD McCARTHV GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - - 4.1.71 RAYMOND SWEENEY The Chairman brought the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Present were Jane Lundregan, Abigail Burns, Thomas Berube, Michael Freeman, Gerald McCarthy, George Nowak, Tadios Sadoski, and associate member Michael Chandler. On motion of Abigail Burns the minutes of the last meeting were ap- proved and accepted. A discussion among the Members followed the introduction of a general form status inquiry from the American Fidelity Company with regard to satisfactory compliance to the terms of a Covenant between the City of Salem and Hyman Marcus-Building Enterprises, Inc. , developers of • the Peter Road-Chandler Road and Linden Avenue development. Gerald McCarthy reported he had discussed this matter previously with the City Solicitor upon receipt of similar inquiries. Tadios Sadoski suggested that the Board forward a memo to the bonding company if it meets with the approval of the City Solicitor, to the effect that we have reason to believe that the requirements of the Covenant have not been met and we are therefor turning the matter over to the City Solic- itor for further action. Mr. Sadoski further suggested that we request a reply from the Solicitor prior to the date of the next Board meeting. Michael Freeman moved that this suggestion be adopted, and the Board voted unanimously to follow this procedure. A letter received by the Board requesting information with regard to • conservation of historic areas in the City will be referred to the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the attention of Director John W. Barrett, and the writer of the let=ter will be notified of this action. 2 Form A application and plan submitted for endorsement by George Vallis representing the DiBiase Realty Trust was the next matter before the Board. Plan shows a large lot of, landj - l02v222t square feet of land at 80 Highland Avenue. Michael Freeman moved that the plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the SubdivisionControl Law; motion seconded by Jane Lundre- gan, all in favor, and so carried. The next item on the agenda was the matter of a contract between the Plan- ning Board and the Planning Services Group. It was decided to check this year' s contract with the contract for 1970, and to request the advice of the City Solicitor before signing the contract The Board, acting on a request for the release of funds due Carter & Tower the engineering firm which prepared the new zoning map, voted unanimously to release payment for this work in the amount of $500.00, a sum held in escrow since December 31, 1970. Gerald McCarthy addressed the Board to report a meeting between the Planning Board and the Salem Redevelopment Authority had been requested by the Author- ity to consider a change in zoning in the B-3 district to permit multi-family dwelling units. The date of the meeting is April 12, commencing at 7: 30 P.M. and will be held in the offices of the Redevelopment Authority. This was the final business of the evening, and the meeting was adjourned at 8: 35 P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITY P ANNING BOARD'le k • F l'LI# J of " fUfj ' SHU55t`TL�TuuftS ABBY BURNS '•;P MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY ';_,¢:; /,r s �ZITTYITIt� Tt7Z�1 JANE LUNDREGAN \� '• �S two ]'.Zppm 7 -- �.�t�1 pallGERALD M.CARTHY C GEORGE NOWAK 4.22-71 TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING APRIL 15, 1971 Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened the meeting at 7:30 P.M. with Board Mem- bers Thomas Berube, Abigail Burns, Michael Freeman, Jane Lundregan,' and , George Nowak present. Motion was entertained to waive reading of the minutes of the previous meeting and to accept and approve same as copies had been forwarded to all members prior to this meeting, and by unanimous vote, motion was adopted. • A letter from Carter & Tower, Engineers who had prepared the new City ' Zoning map was read, referring to prices for reproducing maps in volume. Board voted unanimously to order 1000 copies printed for resale. With regard to the letter to the City Solicitor seeking his counsel as to the proper procedure to follow in filling in the general form status inquiry from a bonding company which provided.'security for satis- factory completion of work in the Peter Road area , the Chairman stated he had discussed this with the City Solicitor. His advice was to con- tact the developer. Michael Freeman moved that the Board fill out the form and send a copy to Mr. Hyman Marcus and Building Enterprises, Inc. , the developer together with a letter stating that if they wish to discuss the matter further, they may appear at the next Board meeting; motion seconded, all in favor, and so voted approved., • A copy of proposed state legislation with regard to installation of signs in this Commonwealth was received, and it was suggested copies be made I 2 - r �nd sent to all members. The proposed by-laws were presented by the com- mittee on outdoor advertising which appears to have done a thorough re- search on the subject and produced a very satisfactory recommendation. A questionnaire received from International City Management Association will be completed by Abby Burns and returned to the association. It was brought out at this meeting that the City Councillors had reduced the amount of the budget requested by the Board for the year from $15,'000. to $80250.00; and further, the Council had reduced the proposed Planning Department budget from $460020.55 to $1,000.00. The matter of the annual dinner meeting of the Board was discussed, and it was decided that on the first Saturday in May, the members and their guests would dine at the Commodore Restaurant in Beverly. This was the final business of the evening, and the meeting was adjourned •t 8: 3U P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk / • 1 01i#g of '*ttlPm, f ElassauhsE#s ' �12Itltttlt,8 �II�C� CHU Xaff Salem, ,�Gmsnslprsetts 0197D ti W NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO o y FORM "A"APPLICATIONS U-; j' in See Form "A" applications for C-) i complete instructions for filing. W W _ a All insertions shall be typewritten to or printed neatly in ink. d cc Z; Date: ..........April 1 , 1971____—, City Clerk, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. 0 The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ..__Highland Avenue --------- -------------------------------------------------------- in War (insert street and street numbers here) DiBIAS BE ' T ST Signature of Owner ----- --- J",��------------------------------�� --;1 A1 tjton__ ----------------- Street Address -70 Was ington S eet ------------------------------ City/I'own&State----------Sale m ---- -----,--------- ---------Massachusetts---=--------------------- ------------------ Telephone Number --------744--2172 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- A S Ctv of ttlem, �Htt�sttc�u�e##s ISIztxuciama Q[ft� �gu absiem, �la,sachuertts FORM A crx c Q, �,vi; APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT to eo OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed fora with the Planning Board and one copy LU Q with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of yr Section II-B. nc H-- at Salem, Mass. ---------------Ap-r-i 1 - -April 1 19--71- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ._.-__-_- said lot shown on plan has adequate frontage on a public way. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------Pp------------ --- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that PlanningBoard approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant -__DiBiase Realty Trust --------- --------------------------------- ----------------------- Address .-_-___-_-71._Hancock Street, Salem, Massachusetts - -- - -- - - - - --- - - - --- ---------------------------------- ------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor __Carter-_&_Towers ---- Address __.6 Fairview Avenue , Swampscott, Massachusetts - --------------------------------------------------- ------- 3. Deed of property records in ------------------ ----------..---------------------------------Registry Book----- -- ----------- ------ Page------- - 4. Location and Description of Property: `U-_Hi-ghlandAvenue ------------------------------------------------------- - - --- ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ----------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DiBIAREYTRT Signature of Owner -__By _ �Attorney ------------ ----- ------- Address _70_Washington_ Stree __,_ Salem, Mass . it ,I . TO ALL MEMBERS: This is a revised copy of the Minutes of the April . 15th Board Meeting; you will notice that reference made in the second last paragraph to the annual dinner meeting of the Board has been deleted. Chris Callahan L � it - 2 - d sent to all members. The proposed by-laws were presented by the com- mittee on outdoor advertising which appears to have done a thorough re- search on the subject and produced a. very satisfactory recommendation. Questionnaire received from International City Management Association will be completed by Abby Burns :and returned to the association. It was brought out at this meeting that the City Councillors had reduced the amount of the budget requested by the Board for the year from $15,000. to $8, 250. ; and further, the Council had reduced the proposed Planning Department budget from $46,020.55 to $1,000.00. This was the final business of the evening, and the meeting was adjourned at 8: 30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, • CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk • ncaw�ra,•. �x � THOMASBERURET♦}u RrGQsy huLTTs ABBY BURNS '.... ' MICHAEL FREEMAN em JAMES GARRITY ?s ^��eg M �ttttnTSl� II�TX� JANE LUNDREGAN • _r. y'` PQUUI 7 -- CtU Pull GERALD A . GEORGE NO NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 5.6.71 Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened the meeting at 7:40 P.M. with Board Members Abby Burns, Jane Lundregan, Thomas Berube, George Nowak, Tadios Sadoski and Michael Freeman present. A Form "A" application and plan, presented for endorsement as not requiring subdivision approval, showed land of Leach-Heckel Leather Corporation at 63 Mason Street, submitted by Counselor John T. Ronayne of Widett & Kruger, its attorneys; the purpose of the plan - to set forth more clearly an ease- ment across an existing lot. Jane Lundregan moved that the plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the subdivision control law, seconded by Michael Freeman, and all in favor, was voted approved. A Form "B" preliminary plan presented by Counselor John R. Serafini for High- land Industrial Park and Highland Realty Trustr showing land off Highland Avenue was the next order of business. This plan is entitled "Preliminary Road Layout, Salem, Mass. , Highland Industrial Park; Scale: 11' = 1001 , dated May 6, 1971, Essex Survey Service, 47 Federal Street, Salem" , and carries a notation "Total area = 161. 5* Acres" . Several copies were submitted, and a �opy will be sent to the City Engineering Department and Health Department respectively, together with letters of transmittal requesting the advice and counsel of both departments. A . status inquiry form, regarding land of Hyman Marcus and Building Enter- prises, received from the bonding company requesting information as to the progress of work agreed to in the Peter Road area , was answered as follows: "The contractor has not completed the required work to date" , signed by the Chairman, and will be forwarded to American Fidelity Company of Cambridge, Massachusetts, the bonding company securing the Covenant between the City Planning Board and Marcus et ali. It was suggested that the City Solicitor be contacted with regard to whether or not such Covenants are recorded at the Registry of Deeds. The matter of the 1971 contract between this Board and the Planning Services Group was discussed and compared with the contract for the previous year. Tadios Sadoski moved that the Board approve this contract, seconded by Michael Freeman, and so approved by unanimous vote. At the request of the Inspector of Buildings, Daniel O'Brien, a plan which had been presented to him in connection with the erection of two eight-unit dwelling houses on Horton Road, was studied by the Members. From records presented, including approval by this Board of a definitive plan following the required procedure for submission and approval of such definitive plans, it was learned that originally the Board of Appeals had granted a variance WIda Talbot, owner of the land, to permit the erection of two four-unit ellings. This was to be accomplished by combining two lots on each side 2 _ of Horton Road. Copies of this decision were presented to this Board with a plan of land for subdivision approval of this definitive plan. The Board • found that the plan submitted to the Building Inspector, now showing two structures proposed to house eight units each is not the same plan approved by this Board for subdivision on Horton Road. The Board recommends that no permit be issued by the Building Inspector in accordance with the plan submitted as said plan is not the same plan which was approved by the Plan- ning Board. The Members reviewed the matter of amendments - to the City Building Code which have been presented to the City Council on previous occasions. Since no action has been taken to date, it was felt that a recommendation from the Planning Board, urging their approval and 'acceptance , of these amendments as proposed, be forwarded to the Councillors for their next meeting to be held on May 13th- Jane Lundregan will draft this recommendation. Mention was made of the fact that election oV Board officers is usually held in May. Nominations and election will take place at the next meeting, May 20th. A communication from the Massachusetts Roadside Council, advising that in- stead of allowing the House to consider the bill, H-522, with regard to out- door advertising complying with local zoning in granting permits for bill- boards, the Speaker dismissed it to House Ways and Means. The letter from Margaret Welch, Legislative Chairman of the Roadside Council, strongly urges that a letter to Chairman Anthony M. Scibelli of the House Ways and Means Committee be dispatched promptly, urging that the bill be returned to the House floor as soon as possible. On motion of Abby Burns, the Board voted 0t follow this suggestion. The Chairman, Gerald McCarthy, presented a communication from the North Shore Gas Company. This was in relation to a plan endorsed by this Board in December, 197u, as not requiring subdivision approval. A copy of that plan and also a copy reproduced from the same plan showing changes after the approval, accompanied the letter. Mr. Freeman moved that the Board reply to the Gas Company as follows: "We accept the plan, and are thankful that you notified us, but we do not expect that changes in plans will occur after they have been signed by members of the Planning Board" . Thomas Berube seconded this motion, and with Tadios Sadoski refraining from voting, it was voted approved. A copy of "Proposal for Planning Study - Harbor Area of Salem, Massachusetts" was brought to the meeting and discussed among the members. Copies will'_ be made and distributed to all members. This was the final business of the evening, and the meeting was adjourned at 9: 45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITY PLAN NG BOARD - Clerk �•CQ\DIT.. ' THOMAS (91tV of �$ttjcm, C41flttssarhuse is ABBY BURNSUBE MICHAEL FREEMAN .^ � a .�ZIkTk[Tlt(TIIiTT�i JAMES GARRITY • n ?4 T `' C JANE LUNDREGAN cLm�va`b UUITI 7 -- Ctu �fil GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 5. 6.71 1. Form "A" - Leach-Heckel Leather Corp. , 63 Mason Street. 2. Form "B" - Preliminary plan, Highland Industrial Park, Highland Realty Trust, off Highland Avenue. 3. Minutes of last meeting, should these be revised? 4. Memo from Rep. Robert Cahill. 5. "Status Inquiry Form" - Hyman Marcus and Building Enterprises. 6. Study of maps prepared by Joe Carter, for approving and accepting prior to reproducing. 7. Does Board propose to recommend adoption of pending amendments to the Building Code to the City Council. We are out of supply of • zoning ordinance copies and building codes, and now with the new map available, it would be a good time to bring all of these to- gether in one book. 8. Does anyone propose recommendations on sign regulations since reading recommended "sign' by-laws in pamphlet. 9. Contract with Planning Services Group. 10. Question of Building Inspector regarding approved subdivision. 11. May is the month for annual election of officers for Board. 12. Copies of Board of Appeals decisions. 13. Notice of Annual meeting, Mass. Federation of Planning Boards, Area 5A, and map of districts. 14. Miscellaneous correspondence from: Roadisde Council Essex Conservation District Dober, Paddock, etc. , Planning Consultants Municipal Yearbook, 1971 Essex Cooperative Extension. • rte. BELIAaVEa NOT TO f'FQr//�6 AP�/@CVAL ' W 1 ry/N 7WC N[EqN/NS OA 77-le �dQO/t/!5/oy COM7X-04 LAa), • %a!ANN/N4 �OfJ.�O . N/F LEACH—HECKEL LEATHER CORD (Reference#4) U �I4.00 -- — — — 30.20 I':14.45:, WAY (Reference#S) 14,00;,.I - 2.60 ' a � it a (Reference) N/ Fofcy #I yI N', N /F DAVID J. a DAISY S. REAGANo_d —o I HAROLD W. a r (Reference # SI �, _ LL� -m CAROL A. KEN NEY In Nr12923-&t.* o ,` I (Reference#21 29235 f.o ,D,D 3 I ?i 21/2 STORY —M O W/F Stone Wal) I_. XOUSE#65 U: 21/2 STORY �� 2W2 STY. u W/F HOUSEM61 I� HOUSE#.3 J U 4.5'L-6, I !V 78 Deed II 37Doe'26 Id I I 11 MASON STREET REFERENCES: REGISTRY OF DEEDS ESSEX SOUTH I. DEED BK. 5478 PG. 202 "SUBJECT TO A• RIGHT OF WAY RESERVED TO THE OWNER OF THE ESTATE LYING SOUTHWESTERLY CF THE GRANTED PREMISES,TWELVE FEET IN WIDTH." 2. DEED BK.4808 PG . 14 "WITH A RIGHT OF WAY APPURTENANT THERETO" 3. DEED BK.3737 PG. 495 4.DEED BK.5640 PG.678 DEED BK.562I QG.481 UNDER PARCEL 3 ' TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHTTO USE THE WAY LEA6ING NORTHWESTERLY FROM SAID PARCEL 3 TO MASON ,�TREET AS APPROXIMATELY _ —�� SHOWN ON SAID PLAN (Seereferenc645) .5. PLAN BK. 3240 PG.256 a� pntts'aM2 a�tK OF h7j�� gTy -; , ," PLAN OF LAND F"I T7. IN .r F 12,U'4 2 SALEM MASS. I hereby certify that this plan Was ;)1U . , u4 ; prepared from the latest plans' 8 ° deeds of- record and the buildings }\ ?VZ SCALE 140 APRIL APRIL I 11971 Were located)on group shown. JOSEPH W. MOORE CO., INC. • CIVIL ENGINEERS-LAND SURVEYORS 16 RAILROAD AVE . BEDFORD MASS. Date Re tered urveyor ASSOCIATED WITH BOSTON SURVEY CONSULTA14TS, INC. DWG. 262 M-377 6 � 4 Ctg of rxIezit, 4Rttssar4usetts eitu Pall �xlaa, �[as�setts D1970 N� rn r- crr m r-. t'1 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO m rn FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for rn complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: --------Apmil 11, 1971-- ;;.City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at -------63--Moz-an)_6tre_e__t-,---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- in Ward ----------------6------------------------------------------- (insert -------------------------------------(insert street and street numbers here) Le -Heckel;. Bather Corp. Signature of Owner ___ _ __. ___ � B Widett & ger, is Attorney Street Address -----__ __FSderal_$ty __,________---_------------------------- City/Town&State__BQaton.___MasAa£huae-tta--------------------------- Telephone Number _482_-4227--------------------------------------------------------------- • Ctv of �$alem, 'Mttssarhuse##s 41HU mail jsalem, 'Massachusefts 01970 FORM A n ' :It APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT rn< OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIREr-r `n ;0 APPROVAL ^'n; 1 3 In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the n'T applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a HL Te Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- g"T s mission for such determination. The notice shall be o attached to two copies of this Form A application. m, The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass-- -------------April 43-j---------19--71- To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. 11-A and state specific reasons) ---No--neia-hnundariea--are--indicated--on---the--plan--Sub-- -s&itted,---its--purpose--be-i ng--merely---tv--more--rlesrly--set--forth---aa--- -easement--_across--an--existing--lot. -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ---Leach-Heckel---heather- £-or-p-------------------- ---------------------------- Address-----72--Elint--Street,_-Salem,---MassaChusetta------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -----FFit$---K.--A,---Peterson Address ------2--gee--Rcad,---Veabody-,---Maasac-husetts-------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in _Essex__South District - Registry Book ---5756--------------------- Page -----------331-------------- 4. ------331-------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: --b3-lda"n--Streets---Sal-em,--Kassa4zhus@tts -bounded-snd--deser-ibed-as---f-ollowa s----1`tORTH"STEItLY---by--MasoB--Street, --thirty-seven---(3-7)----feet-----nine---(9)----inches-r--SoUFHwESTERLY--by--land- _now__or-__formerly---of-_John-F.--Carleton--about--sevet;;ty nine---{79)---€eet; .-S-QUTHEAST ,RLY-_li_y_--land--nobs--or--formerly--tof--N-i.cbols,---thirty-seuen- __(3 71---feet.---nine---19_)---3nches-1---and__NORTHEASTERLY-by--land---now--Ar---- _formerly---o_f_13roderick,-_about--- esenty-nine---(79.)----feet--------------------------- _Conta fining--2994_sguare---feet__of__land,---more-str--- ess_�--------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on a together with the es of the Owners of the abutting lots. L C el Corp. Signature of Owner----- b it & Kruger, It Attorney Address_1--� Stx�:e-t,---Bostan-,---M888„---------------- I` Telephone Number - $$2-4727- - ---- ------------------------------- WIDETT & KRUGER • COUNSELLORS AT L A W HAROLD WIDETT ROBERT ROBINSON HERBERT W.COHEN,OF COUNSEL JOSEPH NRUGER JOSEPH D.MANELLO IRVING WIDETT GERARD D.GOLDSTEIN BENJAMIN ARAC DAVID M.SCHEFFER JOHN LITWACK JEROME GOTKIN SYDNEY BERKMAN JEROME MEDALIE RUDOLPH ROBINSON ALAN I. FALK ROY N.FREED ONE FEDERAL STREET EDWIN A.McCABE HARVEY M.BURG BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110 STEPHEN M.HONIG CARL K.KING CHARLES P.GAMER JEFFREY M.SMITH AREA CODE 617-462-4727 NATHAN WALD DANIEL M.G405BANO DAVID H.KRAVET2 RICHARD J.SNYDER JEFFREY A.BRAUNSTEIN JOHN T. RONAYNE ARNOLD M. FRIEDMAN JEAN S.LONBERG MARK P.HARMON April 13, 1971 City Planning Board City Hall Room 7 Salem, Massachusetts Attention: Miss Christina H. Callahan Dear Miss Callahan: • I am enclosing two copies of completed Form A together with two copies of the notice. I also enclose one linen copy of the plan which we are submitting and one sepia. I understand that you will have these stamped and submit them to the appropriate parties . I plan to call Mr. McCarthy in a day or two to explain our situation. If any questions arise, please call me. Thank you for your cooperation. Cordially, WIDEJTT & KRUGVn ohn tRona ne JTR:ks Encs . • Ic D1 THOMAS Ctu of Salem, C' MS82ILI�LTSP##a ABBY BURNS BERUBE f MICHAEL FREEMAN w3 ' Planning "oarD JAMES GARRITV _• JANE LUNDREGAN Pi oont 7 -- (QttV Pull GERALD MCCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK 4.12.71 TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY y Widett & Kruger, 1 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts ; Attens John Ronayne, Esq. , Dear Mr. Ronaynes ' We are enclosing copies of the Form A application and letters of transmittal which must be submitted in duplicate when presenting . '. a plan for endorsement "Approval Not Required" by the City Planning. Board. I£ you will forward these to the Planning Board, ' City Hall Room 79 Salem, we shall have them stamped by the City Clerk and leave one set for his records, ' as required. , Very truly yours, Icc CIT PLANNING BOARD, Secretary i �� �"a�',��a\D�i (/��'♦}y} rt y�1(ny}� .��I1��y�y ¢�yrr{��T 1T �+ THOMAS BERUBE 1` li1 Salem, �v"4lUDliLL1.K��.iL ABBY BURNS ` 7 11 MICHAEL FREEMAN x m JAMES GARRITY • a �'...' � AttltnjIl"' IIf�rb JANE LUNDREGAN s l � 5 QUltt 7 CtU fall GERALD A GEORGE NO NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 5. 20 , 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY REVISED - 7 . 26 . 71 Prior to this meeting a representative from the Loring Hills Associates , Robert Bowman, appeared to present a plan of land off Highland Avenue*** and pointed out discrepancies on the ,new Zoning map which did not corres- pond to the description of the areas and definition of boundary lines between zoning districts as advertised in the Salem News when map changes were incorporated. *** In original minutes of this meeting, this was erroneously referred to as Loring Avenue , and Mr. Bowman' s name was omitted. . The regular meeting was opened at 8 : 30 P.M. with Chairman Gerald McCarthy presiding. Members present included James Garrity, Abby Burns , Michael Freeman, Jane Lundregan, Thomas Berube , George Nowak, and associate member Michael Chandler. A motion was made by Abby Burns , and seconded by, Michael Freeman, that the Zoning map linen be given to Carter & Towers to have a correction made in a line describing an R-3 area off Highland Avenue because of a conflict in • the original articles in the advertisement for the zoning changes at the time of the last zoning amendments . This is to be done in accordance with a legal opinion by the City Solicitor to be furnished in a letter to the Board. VOTING in FAVOR were - Abby Burns , Michael Freeman, Thomas Berube , Jane Lundregan, and Gerald McCarthy. OPPOSED were - James Garrity and George Nowak. A form A application submitted with a plan showing Land at 164 Lafayette Street , owner Leonard H. Saunders, was presented by Counselor William A. Tracy. The plans showed Lots A and B, containing 6306 square feet and 11 , 551 square feet respectively, the purpose of the plan being to convey the portion shown as Lot A. On motion made and seconded, the Board voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Con- trol Law. A second Form A application was presented next for the endorsement by the Board as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. Owner of this parcel was Angelina Taurasq , Trustee , and the purpose of the plan was to combine existing lots 400 , 401, 402 , 403, 404, and 408 into two parcels , one on Scenic Avenue with an existing dwelling, and the other on Scenic Avenue and Vista Avenue with an existing garage . Thd Board voted to endorse this plan as neither parcel would be left with insufficient • lot area or frontage ,as required by the Zoning Ordinance . On motion made and seconded it was voted to approve and accept minutes of the last meeting. 2 - A letter received from the City Clerk ' s office announcing the reappointment of Mr. Garrity to the Board was read to the meeting, and other Board members •congratulated him on his reappointment . In reply to a letter to the City Solicitor with regard to recording Covenants , a message from him was conveyed to the meeting to the effect that Covenants should be recorded when accepted. The Board voted to forward all Covenants presently being held to the Solicitor to be recorded. It was also suggested that an inquiry to Mr. Ptcoff be made with regard to the possibility of getting interest on the Hyman Marcus-Building Enterprises , Inc . , bond being held .by the Board. Election of officers was the next item of business . On nomination by George Nowak, seconded by Abby Burns , Gerald McCarthy was reelected Chairman of the Board, by unanimous vote . Michael Freeman then nominated George Nowak to succeed himself as Clerk of the Board, seconded by Abby Burns , and Mr. Nowak was also elected by unanimous vote . Reports were made by Abby Burns and Michael Freeman concerning food menus they had checked at various restaurants in preparation of conducting the annual dinner meeting of the Board. It was decided to. select the Daniels House in Salem as the place and June 91 , at 6: 30 as the time . The Mayor, the City Solicitor, the Building Inspector, and the Associate Board Member Michael Chandler, with their wives will be invited guests . This being the last business of the evening, the meeting was adjourned at 10: 00 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, BY CITY PLA NING BOARD, - Clerk f r • �T �y Qy�ryy��* yy��/T`` THOMAS BERUBE a'S CIV of �$atem, ��assar4useL4s ABBY BURNS 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN . r �9q{Attktntnrt 7C*7IIc'lY�l JAMES GARRITY C JANE LUNDREGEGAN �aV..T. 00m 7 -- (IIitg ?dull GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 5.20. 71 Prior to this meeting a representative from the Loring Hills Associates appeared to present a plan of land off Loring Avenue , and pointed out discrepancies on the new Zoning map which did not correspond to the description of the areas and definition of boundary lines between zoning districts as advertised in the Salem News when map changes were incorpo- rated. The regular meeting was opened, at 8: 30 with Chairman Gerald McCarthy pre- siding. Members present included James Garrity, Abby Burns, Michael Freeman, Jane Lundregan, Thomas Berube, George Nowak and associate member Michael Chandler. A form A application submitted with a plan showing Land at 164 Lafayette Street, owner Leonard H. Saunders, was presented by Counselor William A. Tracy. The plans showed Lots A and B containing 6306 square feet and 11, 551 square feet respectively; the purpose of the plan being to convey the portion shown as Lot A. On motion made and seconded, the Board voted • to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Con- trol Law. A second Form A application was presented next for the endorsement by the Board as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. Owner of this parcel was Angelina Tauraso, Trustee, and the purpose of the plan was to combine existing lots 4U0, 401, 402, 403, 404, and 408 into two parcels one on Scenic Avenue with an existing dwelling, and the other on Scenic Avenue and Vista Avenue with an existing garage . The Board voted to endorse this plan as neither parcel would be left with insufficient lot area or frontage as required by the Zoning Ordin- ance. On motion made and seconded it was voted to approve and accept minutes of the last meeting. A letter received from the City Clerk' s office announcing the reappoint- ment of Mr. Garrity to the Board was read to the meeting, and other Board members congratulated him on his reappointment. In reply to a letter to the City Solicitor with regard to recording Covenants a message from him was conveyed to the meeting to the effect that Covenants should be recorded when accepted. The Board voted to forward all Covenants presently being held to the Solicitor to be re- corded. It was also suggested that an inquiry to Mr. Pitcoff be made • with regard to the possibility of getting interest on the Hvman Marcus- Building Enterprises, Inc. , bond being held by the 2 `Election of officers was the next item of business. On nomination by George Nowak, seconded by Abby Burns, Gerald McCarthy was reelected Chairman of the Board, by unanimous vote. Michael Freeman then nominated George Nowak to succeed himself as clerk of the Board, seconded by Abby Burns, and Mr. Nowak was also elected by unanimous vote. Reports were made by Abby Burns and Michael Freeman concerning food menus they had checked at various restaurants in geparation of conducting the annual dinner meeting of the Board. It was decided to select the Daniels House in Salem as the place and June 9th, at 6: 30 as the time. The Mayor, the City Solicitor, the Building Inspector, and the Associate Board Member, Michael Chandler,with their wives will be invited guests. This being the last business of the evening, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Y y' ' ,Respectfully submitted, . BY r CITY PL NI G BOA D, - CLERK • • UBETiTHOMAS BER tV rir �nn , assarhue `s ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN �js Y'.^' �' A❑AtttTntIT� nZCXU JAMES GARRITY r�µ ` JANE LUNDREGAN v , krc�. p6iy C�iaam 7 -- CtU Hall GERALD McCARTHY •uf GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 5 . 20 . 71 1 . Form A application and plan, Leonard H. Saunders , 164 Lafayette Street . 2 . Form A application and plan, Angelina Tauraso , Trustee, West End Heights Trust , 4 Scenic Avenue . 3• Signing Minutes of last two meetings , if no changes are to be made. 4. Letter from City Clerk re-Reappointment of Mr. Garrity to Board. 5 • Letter received by City Council regarding septic tanks in the Chandler Road area , referred by Council to this Board. 6 . Message from Mr. Pitcoff with regard to letter from Board • relating to proper procedures to follow upon acceptance of security in the form of Covenants . 7 . Letter from Board to Mr. O ' Brien, the Inspector of Buildings . 8 . Memo to members advising of revised second page of minutes of April 15th meeting. 9 . Letter from House & Garden. (Mr. Mehlhorn called the office this morning for briefing on progress in Urban Renewal Area and was referred to Mr. Barrett , director of the Redevelopment Authority. 10 . "Proposal for Planning Study - Harbor Area ' of Salem, Mass . " Copies already forwarded to members . 11 . Notices and agenda of May 24th meeting of Appeals Board. 12 . Plans presented to the Building Inspector today for viewing by department heads of proposed "Pequot Project" off Highland Avenue . 13. Progress of Committee for Annual Dinner Meeting. 14. Miscellaneous correspondence . r -° � A17� • n C 1 ' hVlu� Ctg of 4alem, 'Mttssar4use##s ` IVES ,REGI '� � � ittxatin� uMr� M►ar 1� 9 21is • clTJ ULE7 r 56OFF'Cal to Pell em,�fassaclluseHs 0197D NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM "A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: — — 319n —— City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at — � Stx88a ---- ----- ---------------- - fltt--1sdhu9ett8-------------------------— in Ward ---- '------------------------------—-------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) s Signature of Ownerailllf@l1� __3SSAtJQ1� TiLlgts_au-� Oaaa�O Street Address __2i?.tat�_ _----------_-- --_----------- City/Town -_ _ _City/Town&State---Bmt9Vdickr-- 3---------------------------- Telephone Number _AteB_COde ?----- 3 —----- Atto=ay: Wi7:3. am A. Txacys Ea ql 46 Stith A Meet i sleheadj Massachusetts 03.945 6314030 k W.ttgi of $alert, HMkS�ICC1�t�E� C,EIYED �;T� c1ttxlitl� nxr Mar 1 a 9 211% '11 17Y CLtF.t s SSFIC� fall SALEM 9Aalrm; AIussttclittutte 01970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A; with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass.- --------------- —T-' - #-----------19-21-- To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect, II-A and state specific reasons) ___-i 31.310t -w- t1 in--the_defAnition "------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. f L Name of Owner __ au fig 8aW1ders_-------------------------- - ------- --------- -" "_ Address__ftout0_ s %Iing1� artd:__rVAA 3 -------- --------------------- 2. -- - 2. Name of Engineer.or Surveyor ___wt 'dAr+gd ktt-- --------- --------- --------.------ Address ------------- 3. Deed of property records in ---Essex-3011therll_Di&tsut------------------ Registry Book _-5-1-4-2------------------------- Page _(O-q-4---------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _164tette_.'xjrfttl__,521SM4__xdSiaW=ett8--. E8$1zs2►i�--at--th6--1�@i'Lhe8stE2�t'_13sa3'xl8r_-Af_.1+Cet �i,-end. arl-the-2�®��� a�-=�--- W-gyatl<a i-Streets ae shown arc S_I'lsn enL3tle ___" cl_oE__1 e�+a s�_ : 8auaders, --- a,Ypette_5tree ' __5ea-- S __ 1e_1. +.1itl-fes:---tf�g' 14T1_ ---------- ks k�giatered Siasyctr"Brudg­ - ------ ------ ------ ----------- ----------------- ther]y 1y_Iatayatta Street. -a_di®Laztce--+af 634 %tl-------- - Tjjsnd4�um3nL+__aetri_xunninig" RortYLs ate -1� -lam --stf--A h3x1 A� 3?tteYnsa a d9e£ano® of 63:. fast) - - FterFeE®aIy r" attd of nahor a distana -- SAO+ttO s ee an abu'fing 1�all be shown the Plan together with the names ofewners of the'abutting lots., Gv�and , W .S qul t.Mc�R�.p, `t t -rte Atterney - Signature of Owner--- -�- Y►aa M1dA0 -� . William Ao Tracy AddressRottEe 2s Dln ley Woods 1-- $ok,t Maine____------ �' Lsb Stith Street Area Cafle 209 925 5633 ' p�3r� ad 14asss Telephone Number ____ _ _ __ ___--__-_ --- - _ -_,_-- ' r,o-1eti.- _ .... r �. --..+r.r..�..r..—..+..w� .+r..a��r,<.�.. .. ...n�.� _ ..�........ -�+..«+w.�...nr.........w...r....• .+.�ws.-M9 �� 1 i � * � adrbbAJNiNNy7 a-''J min �ou�o7/amu • ua�st�P9rtS'���viv/ate .d of �y,��f• :�� .�.. 47Z a O °e 9-/07 61-`07 8 i gyp, 0 00 ,0 po gg r tea` •' <+g' � I r}ISNAZUi1135\I r`I .. s��an�nds- y oa�dnioa7 �4- � 11 SUN ERS LEON .ev [E ,v FTc 97/Y/ a Ae (1^. /EDWIN A SRUDZY 1 0 • L14FAYErrkSr. •ae e U 8 LorfJ g Lora SOM V I 1 O &'S/ o ,.0/6:r, A iQo2chno .sr�7r V ✓o/an�c�.S�d.9sra� n�/Lo�nod•��urrc�d GF-M PLANNING fiQgKo • R7� • s Ctv of �$tt1ew, 'fflttssar4use##s Planning Pnttrbi Cite xall Calan, �lassacltasetts D197D U. w � cry'4 > �" �a NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO V V WW CC c .-A a FORM"A"APPLICATIONS r �> N See Form "A" applications for w complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: --- --------- ZOO/97/__-- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at _____ ___ eF2L____! F/1_ e___ in Ward 1l FOur'------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) est E��i 4 7�7aS7-' Signature of Owner fAl w L --------? Street Address ------4 __--_--4�_ 1 G—-----Z7-�- --- --------- City//own&State------">C'77 P� -� =-------------------------------- Telephone Number ---------744-__----7f?� -------------------------------------------- FRANK Px , S n' v HANCOCK fa F E �Sit"fix, �,cauw 01i#u of $atom, fflassar4usetts pimnins Piano Cau Pall �al¢m, ,.�Rassacliusetfs D1970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT e OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL 0.44 In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the j „.� `."a applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a w Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- v wuw mission for such determination. The notice shall be W JJ Cr N YN attached to two copies of this Form A application. c The notice and both copies of the application must .0 be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass.> - //�Zf/ � 197 ---- /--------- - To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivvisic�onn Control Law because (See Sect II-A and state specific reasons)�_-_ /---f--�-7--------✓L___GOI75�TUf�5 G') 6-041 So/ _R_,7 14---- X60r -On -----G- --5 1_X71✓1 _ 16v_ 1-- ---`�---rG�ar�/��/ Tan - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ------Y�_e�7C----Y'd----- �� �1tS TrvS�j---� h9 P.�lq�l �Avfd`✓0 fYCc.. -------- t - ------------------- 1 11 Address-------- , eh - - �� G _� A 55 ---------------------- 2. - - - �// --------- r 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ---_--__�✓-__`7__P_Y__-7 P-,) cq - - yarvPSL Address------A=-1---1�-G� z ✓'���-- -}---LJZt�Gwi i N6cc�i------- ---------- �j v f _ c �14�v<<_T 4251, 34-z 3. Deed of property records in ______ _4_-_____�1-_-_�HS__-�-_--_--_--_---_-_ Registry 4 333 / 15.5, Book ------------------------------- Page ------------------ 4344 "Z t;' 4. Location and Description of Property: ---LlzC,---t----------V--ti-_'t----------------------- ----------------- ---S_0_UThuze.ste.r [�-,------iAG---- sc.arnic------glta, � C- na r7_bG7 t,te- l4, ------tz-Vie-----af- 1� ' �1------ ° -r -----pl yl---cam _bin Nva----- a3aa - 1�t5 -�{o_t _Nal� - jt-a�I- �Q3-y-',04 �4A---40-0--t-5_how-14---pn---p Izr h--- regio rc�cr(-'n-----pt o n - ---5-t_P-I2-W,----�-T ?rte P -f W O -�'a r�cl S t O ne- __y- T------ ------- 4tCr �dT�F-----�lh--- 1`z �- `F - QVC_ I!�+ t pNG----v - -� , -A 14 1- iTl--------P--�-'------�-�- - ----- - ----(i l�7t1-N ----Gf_s? Ir0.�G --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- d • o` SA+ eets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan ltgether,cyith t1 e4aniM of tl>-Owners C. of t e,""butting lots. IIJ� ' n tY?fet ru IVY HANCOCK v'K Signature of Owner-D p __ `t. No.760 cF - G ------------------------------ e Aress - G -j -- t _-- -Telephone Number - - - - - - - - --------------- /qn ;0r01W /4� of ����• � 8 rPcoid of ESSPX South ��-9fry of SSC� nye o o U� St�.5- G'� � � • m .A�oProrts/undri tfx S'ubodivisian Be � ?kr p°' ��• C'onfio/ .Caw not rrQviiEn' u.�dPr t L'hao% 4/ C.L. Sec. B/P. ,pP �� q bg 3S�. SAGEwI PLANN/Ncs ti9oA�O StQ � AD o 000i4.P1EL 4;4 e � \ s Cn _ �g� •\P yore: . Aa-eel f! of Cof 9D2� LRf908o%!�f`ie • n ° o �� y�lroC�`Tc� �y .aaieP/ 'B is q Oombi�otiv�vf'.Cots 400¢4a/qqo' U /DiQ�CELAg 5" q04: 4f77's PLAN . o f LAND q 0 7� PO iq -q �a4 .; ��1%3so aQ�°�hye} 0 SALEM b� ; Q ee � � Pioperfy of Wesf Enc✓ h/eighfs Tius JG A•�ge/.h4 Toweaso, Trusfeam, Seale: /�=40 , Moy /7197/ V� ESSEX SWVEY SF_.eV/CE /NC. q 47 Federn/ Street, SQ/em S.33S THOMAS BERUBE lA L Zi:J ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITV _r JANE LUNDREGAN w .y GERALD MCCARTHV k!'�iwns uum 7 CtU �ittll GEC RG E NOWAK TAOIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 6. 3. 71 With Chairman Gerald McCarthy presiding, this meeting was opened at 7: 30 P.M. Three Form A applications were submitted with plans for endorsement. The first applicant was Jeffery W. Cohen whose plan showed land at 9 Cres- cent Drive , the rear portion of which is to be conveyed to an abutter on Summit Street. Counselor George Vallis presented an application and plan showing land at Lot No. 10 Highland Avenue, in behalf of his client DiBase-Salem Realty Trust. The third application referred to land of Louis and Alice Gerber at 13 Plymouth Street, the purpose of this plan being to convey a portion of the lot to each of two abutters. On motion made and seconded, it was voted to endorse all of these plans • as not requiring approval under Subdivision Control Law. On motion of Mr. Freeman, the Board voted to apprpve and accept the min- utes of the last meeting. It was brought to the attention of the Members that the recently prepared Zoning map will require additional corrections. The Building Inspector, Mr. Daniel J. O' Brien, presented two problems he has in his office; the first with regard to a proposed development off Highland Avenue by Pequot Associates. Mr. O" Brien wished clarification of the issue of installing a road off a State highway. It was the general opinion of the Members that this developer should present this problem to the proper authority for the State, before further proceeding with this plan. Mr. O' Brien' s second problem had to do with the construction of a dwelling by Narcisse Talbot on Horton Road and proposed location on the lot. The Board felt that in view of the numerous plans and proposals previously presented with regard to this site , it would be in the best interest of all parties concerned to have this developer appear with his attorney at the next meeting of the Planning Board in order to determine exactly what the final outcome shall be. Literature received by the Board was reviewed and placed on file. All business brought to this meeting having been attended to, it was voted to adjourn at 9; 30 P.M. Resp ctfully subm ted, CITY PLA94NING/�BOARD, Clerk ' ` „icaw�p., ♦}yyy}}} �y 1(nm NQ yy �T }} THOMAS BERUBE RO �L4 of $alem, �v"4lnssar4uset4s ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY Planning uttrb JANE LU NDREGAN A ci.ave.�"b QOIri 7 -y Ctu Pull GERALD GEORGE NO NOWAK TADIUSSADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA -- CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 6. 3.71 1. Form A application and plan, Cohen - 9 Crescent Drive Form, A application and plan, DiBiase Realty Trust, Highland Avenue and Heritage Drive. Form A application and plan, Gerber - Plymouth Street and Clifton Avenue. 2 . Minutes of last meeting for acceptance and signature. 3. Decisions on Board of Appeal hearings. 4. New Zoning map with required corrections ; ok to reproduce now? 5. Plan received in Building Inspector' s office for development off Highland Avenue ; Mr. O'Brien would like to know who would be re- sponsible for the proposed road as it would be off a State Highway. • 6. New plan submitted by Narcisse Talbot for dwelling on Horton Road presented to Mr. O'Brien for building permit ; he questions the lo- cation of the proposed structure with relation to location on lot approved by Board of Appeals and Planning Board on definitive plan. 7. Literature from Mr. Dunkelbarger regarding Management of Solid Wastes. 8. Invitations and menu selections for dinner meeting sent out May 26th, 1971; did everyone receive one? 9. Literature from Department of Community Affairs regarding "Executive Development Conference in Program Management" . 10. Invitation to membership in "The Academy of Political Science" . 11. Questionnaire from International City Management Association. (I thought someone had filled one of these out and sent it in a while back) . • (11it of alertr [ttssttcllixse##s w,_ ;5 � � ' 6d�_ GE14Eo .�w. dunning Jute - 1 10 of AX 971 cfrr cLERKr 6 o�tl 9tt SAL,WM;gjj nt97D NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM "A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: ___ M 2 7. 1971 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan fled with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at -----------------------------------------------–------------ .____9 Crescent Drive ------ in Ward --- ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------- (insert .street and street numbers here) �J Signature of Own _ -- - -- – Street Address ---- ---- - -----------—– –------------ City/Town&State–- -------- ------- -- -�-- – Telephone Number ---------- – —--------------------- if $meta, Aassa r4usetts RECEIVE1 CITY CLLii(VJffi4fPAE �i#lE�.,�As�9i.littsexs ai9zn FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -------MaY_-27---------------------1971- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and • state specific reasons) ----k2otl]---IAts---1393-and-l,ot___140conform_with the_____-__-- necessary lot requirements in that_ they have at least 70 foot - - -- --------- -- _frontaae_andmore_than 7000square feet area. __ __ -- -----_-------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner __deff_exy--la°---oohen.-at---'�-------------------------------------------------------------- Address-------- - em----------------------------------------- ---- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----Zssex__. urvay___Serv1ce_,__-Sns:-0___________________-__--__ Address ---4-7--- ederal__&treat,-Salem------------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ---EssQx__South__-Di.s_t_r_i9t---------------- Registry Book -----5470------------ Page 186----------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _-.-_-----------------------------------------_ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together 'th4aoffth Oof the abutting lots. Signature of Ow r- -- - JAddress-� -Telephone Number -------------------------------------------------- ------- R��Ft4�E�1 �1t11 I]1 r,`�M�Pttt� �ttBSFIC�(ttBP�t� .11 � JuH CITY LLj�,NMSSSFiCB 0'tg 3;311 ;'F'" ;�ttlem, �-wsa:ljur.. te r1Y70 401 '.NOTICE TO BE A1-1AC:HF,D TO FORM "A"APPI ICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewntten or printed neatly in ink. Date: _. Juaa �- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts J1970 J Dear Sir: 1 hand you herewith two copies of Form i, .lir application submitt,d br me thu day t . 'hc Plan ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan tip site said application-that Planning Board dpprmal under for Subdivision Control Rule, and Eege7 It )11, ; not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is locatcd .a _Highlan(f A-ven',e - iq0j rd 4- ,insert street and street numbers here) I)iBi s( —Sal al y `frust. R1. Sienature of Owner A,/ eY Street Address 70 Washington street _ c.iry 'l' ria & State Salem , Massachusetts T 1,phone Mmher 714-2172 RECEIVEDCty of '*alm' 'Massar4uOrtts 3 2 39 PH 1hanning Paurb CiTSACLEMKMASS. situ Pull �$aleaz, 'filassachusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass-- --------------------June-3'--------------1971--- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ------------ said lot shown _--_--_____saidlotshownon -plan__has_-adequate_ frontage on__a__public_Kay.............. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant DiBiase-Salem Realty_-Trust------------------------------------------------------------ , Massachusetts Address ---------71- Hancock------------------ ----Street,--------- Salem -- ---------------- - ---------------- --- ------------------ ----- - Carter & Towers 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address -__6-Fairview -Avenue,- Swampscott, Massachusetts 3. Deed of property records in _Essex So-uth- --Distr-ict---------------Registry - ---- -- ---- - - Book--------5669------- Page-----2-51---------- ----- 4. Location and Description of Property: __-_Pighland_-Avenue - ------------------------------------------------- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -it------------------------------- Di�ase-SLem salty Trust Attorn n Signature °� §hi'tzgtr�n-- reek---Saiem-i--Mass,-------- Address - - - - - - Ferre A Jeoneffe ,eic�prd /OG:29 rn •• • 49.40 • LOT l39'4 �,Cof /�o a 3Z 0.f. Eduraro/ Soufhe 3 Area= M90 ts.F 49.40 ... ' �?..... ...... • Nl9°0/'20'%✓ : R in zaberf Burke 1,of /38 ti i00.0a . ,� t� LOT 1398 S G°/S'4a'x�•i h1 �9 •;ZD.4f° . Z, . !lien=/a,395tsf. 3 tc/ mg o, W _. L-4-6,Z . N 46° /3' 40"W ad ad C.eESCENT (aa" Wide) DeIYE 601 ATE: ,Cot l39Ale be mmeyed k Edward Southern, Oh&lting owner. ad. •• ,4porova/under fhe Subdir�siarr Contra/ ;Coca not required under Chop. 4/, G,L Sec. B/P. SALEM pL4NN/N6 BOARP " PLAN of LANG in der yTfj SALEM r s„ f5 property of Qafe: Scale /'=40' Aug 7. /9740 ESSEX SURVEY. SERVICE''/AIC U 47 Federal S>reat S4/em '"49/:x' �` X34'f 9'-�o•�✓ s6.g4 John E.Be�ocK - ..�i r��N - - tpN Ln v n h Manual t4asves N3 TZflbr� Y. Oval(ette ,00 ti N e+al e4`�, W pf� / -Il 16o.ao n 3 � ` 0 o t>t l YS r9r ' � JJ Lo-r r�i° I I ( ' 23,3115.F. a - for N' 10 a V m��s 3,867 s.F ro N W I O 9 X577 S.F: ' vie _ ! o 0 6 0 6' 0 3 0 Su„anJc o� 0 II U .TSE- cc)N"T'{ZUCTIOtS00 N i i t!� 1.7 lsvr�'�Vr n L1 tj / z -� 8iZ �5 � _�\ i 3 \ K fN ! 711 i / ' Lor 3 I ' 47, '117 s.F. i 4-8.Ir74 s.�. Z I Q 3, 8 S.F. Q i J ' 44 ,ZZ9 s.F I i 44,307 s.l-. 2 � o i I i HERITAGE DRIVE I SALEM , MASS APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION SUBDIVISION ' OF LAND CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED COLONIAL VILLAGE DIB I ASE REALTY TRUST - SCALE I =' 40 ff. MAY 26, 1971 CARTER & TOWERS ENG. CORP. 6 FAIRVIEW AVE. -- SWAMPSCOTT , MASS . } I - .� I i i l � Cy O r _ __.. _ i O r �' ,. �� p � i, it I� { ,, i i �; � :, �� � O - -- ' I COLONIAL VILLAGE EXTENSION SUBDIVISION PLAN SALEM MASS. DI ® IASE REALTY TRUST SCALE I 40' MARCH 23, 1971 l CARTER a TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. ��y i 6 FAIRVIEW AVE. , l SWAMPSCOTT MASS. fI I � { Ik -� ffi r l f � a8 `vl o ~ o 4 b I $ ��, � Y LOT 5 A. 4c 42.,7 r I rs I. L�K.a�.ysZ�wSKi -� v �s tib o° aef o •S. Man�e� Ma���s e4uc \ 23157 s.c 16 m LOT 3Q n1 \\ Za.69 9 [7�. Z CASE MEtJT � P�O.W. ado P LOT NO. 10 1 102 ,222 S.F. I 3 3 LOT 2 o q..8.4 7o ST'7 i 0 48. 7 4 S.F w {{, a 7 0: o ! ILOT oc w U� (D Q h 9g r 545*o3.\ { Q f Vn1 fLOT (�0. I1 O s - w 2 33317 S.F a A _ � o o a � 4F a 29'-45 i HIGHLAND AVE . f i t r {. i ; E F i - t ��l�Qut2>`r� un1aE_c�_'1-r+>= SupDN�S1o+�{ I I ►J oTE : tJ0 PENCE-S o2.B.ra2El Et2S SHALL E3 COfJT2p` Lf>w. ...-_ DN Anly INTE1Z10�'� l_OT LINE_ d25ET IN ,p Ny 1 � i LOCAT10 tJ i HAT WOut_I� 11JTE2FEf21= WtTk-F I ` - 1 PACZSCIt�SG O 'F�TH� FLOW 6F TPAFFIC,. yt.1TE�102... .,_-,._.� _ � ' LOT LINES A2E P-oK. r-�ocZT�o.�>= �, zoa,N� pvQPoSE_S {• i' c� (9itV of Salem, Aassar4usetts Planning pourb (9itu Dalt Aaiem, �t $ i2usett$ FORM A w '+. u APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT C) U. OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL t�4 W File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy � 1w with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of OC �. c>,a Section II-B. y w Salem, Mass., •------------------Mai __2_4•----------------19-71_ To the Planing Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Low because (see St. II-AA1 _ the undersigned were owners of all lots at the corner o Akit_on-and P-lymouth--Str.-eets--shown---on--plan--which__is__preaentad__herewi th,__They_conteyed the parcel at the corner consisting of 6525 sq. ft. to Edward S . Margerum and---Eileen-G Marger -by--deed---datett-,July--l4r--1-968,---ree-orded__with_* and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant _..___L0UiB_G_erbar_andAlice_Gerber-_ -- -- --------------------------------------------- Address ----------13_P_lyMq th_Street,-_Salem,_--Mass. - - 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor__..EdWin__T.__Brudzynaki--------________________________________________________ Address ------26 ---Leftyette--St.,---Sa].em,---Mass�----------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in -----F+sHex__S0% th_DistriCt________Registry Book--3467---------------Page------317---------------- mentioned 4. Location and Description of Property: Lot_A_-_1onabove/plan, on Plymouth St.,Salem *Essex So.__Dist.__Deeds, Book 5541, Page 724. At the time of conveyance, the ungg r i ned a reed-Th-----r ti-------t------ iIT -a ;tid�i ts£ tizeir re wing land whic�i Pow ap;ears as �o s RY and h on �gis plan to Mr. an S. i Margerum, at- €Ke—o tia-a--of--iMr- -and--Mrs.--Margexum,---which--option--i-s--now to o become an integral 1�aa rt of the 6525 sq. ft. of Lot an and is not to dlt a n-, Sat--A2---ia__to__betaome__an__j to ral art be exercised. Lot is t pa;°eel--and--#.s--�-�a--�-ie--b po �3 a is o be built upon, lot #p13 being now awned by t e undersigned pp ughter__and__son-ln-law_ __Mr. and Mrs__. Robert B. Richman. The sole purpose of this plan is to indicate tT�e �orttori-of Lot Al to be conveyed to Mr. and Mrs. Margerum and the portion shown as Lot A2 to be conveyed to Robert D. Richman et u�x^. / Signature of Ownea ____ _�1_uc _G lir fSe r �l 3rr. _,6P,~.,gl }l!Xbbm ------ ------ - --------------------- Address : 13 Plymouth St., Salem, Mass . i 85 LAND F 195 7 LQ IS & ALICE GERBER j {P LYM UTF ' ST. SALEM, MA$S. SC' LE, I IN:=40 FT. -JAN. 1957 REG15T'�RE.D 5 VEYOR � _ 1 P LY M 0(j T aE 6' Y O LO r,• .,. ai �'' utSBq `, ' 5200 S. F. <. Ltd - , RB 3 J - v 460.0 S,'F M. ` \ ESSEX PffI (RY OF DEEDS, SO. DIST. SALEq, MASS. ' wd 3�. 13 19.57 rid o4_QQ,�-- MERRILL°`.a.. �•. / c�• ' uJf.mQnt, Qt (l!( t_.. _. f LUNDERGAN rzK. g 5�3116P 5 7 F;,.d ou No. 8 5" r957 " Ca t2 T End of sentence on last line of Page 1 removed �t request of Members . yy, y{ �} {y.��* 1T THOMAS BERUBE Ti#u of $aleln, fflagsar4usetts ABBY BURNS 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY ?' 0.. g �ZIYYYi[St� t IIGIY•� JANE LUNDREGAN • r � �nmsv�y NO Pam 7 -- Oitg ,Jblt GERALD A RTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 6 . 17 .71 RAYMOND SWEENEY REVISED - 7 . 26 . 71 This meeting was open6d by the Chairman, Gerald T. McCarthy, at 7 : 30 P.M. Members present were George Nowak, Thomas Berube , Abby Burns , Tadios Sad- oski and Michael Freeman. Mr. Nowak moved that the minutes of the last meeting be approved and ac- cepted, seconded by Mrs . Burns , and so voted. Mr. George Vallis , Counsel for developers Salem Acres , Inc . , and DiBiase Bros . appeared and thanked the members for taking the time to listen to him. The reason he came was to make a progress report of what his client is doing at Witchcraft Heights and Colonial Village, also , what he would like to do in the near future . He presented a proposal to the Board with regard to rezoning land off Marlborough Road and land off Jefferson Avenue and Loring Avenue . Mr. Vallis stated that before a decision could be reached as to the wisdom of rezoning these or any other areas , four questions or problems should be answered: fiscal impact , impact of utilities , transportation system impact , and esthetic impact , and proceeded to speak along these lines , • outlying his clients ' proposals with regard to these four problems . In the Jefferson Avenue-Loring Avenue site there are approximately 100 acres of which they wish to have 40 acres rezoned for multi-family res- idences; the Marlborough Road locus contains approximately 150 acres , portions of this they also hope may be rezoned to permit construction of multi family residences . These would be garden type apartment buildings , some of which might be town houses or condominiums ; this would be aimed at serving those who wish and can afford quality housing; at present the Zoning Ordinance per- mits one dwelling unit for each 1000 square feet of lot area in these R-3 districts ; the developers would build one unit for each 2000-2500 square feet of lot area ; they would build swimming pools, tennis courts , recrea- tion areas , and would also be willing to set aside a tract for recreation to be used by the inhabitants of this City. This project would take about six years and would be developed in three phases . Board Members questioned Mr. Vallis with regard to the proposals for developing the parcel off Jefferson, a known swampy area , relative to a natural watershed. He said they propose to drain the wet area shown on the map and channel it by drainpipes to the brook crossing Jefferson Av- enue . According to their engineer, Mr. Carter, the brook is of sufficient size to do the work without harm to the property of any other person. •As far as the utilities are concerned, Mr. Vallis stated they are adequate to support the type of construction proposed. The City Engineer, Mr. Ralph Tedford, who was present at this meeting, affirmed this fact . Mr. Vallis pointed out that the property Is an open, blighted area, really a mesa, with gravel pits , boulders and trash: - 2 - A full copy of the Counselor ' s presentation is attached hereto , and for the • record, becomes an integral part of the minutes of this meeting. It was suggested to the City Engineer that , the flood control areas in the City should be outlined on the Zoning maps , and he agreed. He further stated that the City has applied for funds from HUD in connection with the Flood Control Program. Counselor John Serafini appeared for Mr. Talbot , a client of his who is also a developer of subdivision- on Horton Road. Mr. Talbot has submitted plan after plan with a different proposal each time , and the situation now is one of complete confusion for all involved. In fact , at a recent meet- ing of this Board a proposal to rescind approval of the original Definitive plan was seriously discussed. Mr. Serafini stated that what the Board ac- tually approved was installation of the roadway and the utilities , and since the plan was approved the utilities have been installed and connec- tions made ; also , a few months ago , the City made a taking of approximately four thousand square feet of land on the right hand side of the road for the flood control project ; Mr. Talbot has installed a sewer up the hill and connected it but has not installed the drainage shown on the plan; this shall have to be done to comply with the Subidivision regulations . It was the general opinion of the Members and a motion made and carried to the effect that we notify the City Solicitor to draw up a Covenant to pro- tect the City, and insure the proper installation of all utilities , road- way, etc . , as required by the Subdivision Control Law, and to incorporate into said Covenant a stipulation that a certificate of occupancy shall be • required before any dwelling unit may be occupied, and the road must be finished before such certificate may issue , and when said Covenant has been drawn, approved, and the proper signatures affixed, this document shall be recorded at the Registry of Deeds . Copies of decisions on petitions brought to the Board of Appeal were presented to the meeting, and also, notices of new petitions to be heard by that Board on June 21 , 1971 . Miscellaneous correspondence brought to the meeting will be zeroxed and copies distributed to all members , , since the copier had broken down and this could not be attended to prior to this meeting. All business for the evening having been attended to, it was voted to adjourn at 9: 55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, 3L� o o o�,oL CITY P1,4&XIM3 BOARD, Clerk • • PRESENTATION MADE BY GEORGE VALLIS, COUNSEL FOR DI BIASE BROS. WITH REGARD TO REZONING PROPOSALS TO THE CITY PLANNING BOARD, 6. 17-71 As you know, the demand for housing in this City, this State, and the entire country is pressing and continues unabated. • In November, 1965, the first house in Witchcraft Heights was sold and now six years later nearly 350 homes have been built and sold and the building continues. About three years ago, my client began construction of Colonial Village and now 254 units have been rented and the building continues. There remains about 70 house lots in Witchcraft Heights and plans have been formulated to erect an additional 80 apartment units in Colonial Village ; also, plans have begun to develop a mini-shopping area on Highland Avenue , similar to the shopping area in Marblehead on Pleasant Street. Such a shooping area is permitted under our present zoning as a special use to complement the garden type apartment complex. It is hoped that construc- tion of this shopping area will begin within a year and it is expected that this area will include , among other things, a drug store , a barber shop, beauty parlor, restaurant, food store, gift shops , and professional offices. I have had the good fortune in worl�ing closely with Mr. DiBiase during these years , and one thing he has shown me during this time is unlimited energy and courage and a lot of foresight. Salem will continue to grow and remain viable as long as there are people willing to plan and invest in its future. With land fast running out for large single family subdivision construc- tion, with prices for such single family homes growing out of the reach of the middle income family, and with land costs running into astronom- ical figures, Mr. DiBiase as a builder-planner is attempting to turn to and develop new concepts in building. He is looking for apartment zoning for cluster development , and I would like to present my client ' s proposal for the development of land in Wards 7 and 4 for the purpose of garden type apartments which may include town houses and condominiums. To begin with, construction of apartments requires apartment zoning. I submit to you that our present zoning is not responsive to our community needs for growth and progress and future possibilities. I have shown in our present zonin map the areas zoned for R-3, multiple family use, which is colored in red�(here map was presented) , my client ' s interest in the developme t for apartment use is the eland which I have outlined in red stripes. .' ,K r/"/-2» "�'�� .� h-r[. L) cr.GG-sYi� .�Gc.r✓Li-�¢ �'" In Ward 7, my client owns approximately 100 acres of land of which he desires to rezone 40 acres into an R-3 zone . This type of housing would be aimed at serving those who wish and can afford quality housing, who want open space and do not want and can not manage the burdens of Dome maintenance . Before you can make any decision as to the wisdom of rezoning these areas or any other areas , there are four questions or problems which should be answered; FIRST, is the fiscal impact • SECOND, is the impact on utilities THIRD, is the transportation system impact , and FOURTH„ is the esthetics impact . r - 2 - An important point to consider'- in the fiscal impact is the fact that in this 'City last year, 38¢ of every dollar that was levied for real estate taxes s applied to the schools . Compare this to 19.64 when 28¢ of every dollar s applied to schools'. - It° is, an established fact that apartment house dis- tricts do not produce as.'many school -aged children as single family home developments . The market for apartments is based predominately on the smal- ler householder, the elderly, the childless , and the highly mobile couples . In this group we find young married couples who are both working and find garden type apartments a step toward home ownership. Older couples, whose children have grown, also tend towards garden apartments close to their children' s homes and with the increasing life expectancy, the number of older couples entering the apartments tends to increase . Garden type apart- ments are not conducive to the raising of children, for as the family grows , -- parents tend to leave apartments in favor of single family dwellings . As I stated earlier, there are presently 254 units in Colonial Village . There are only 6 school aged children living there . Of the 28 units in the newly built Continental Apartments on Lafayette Street , there are no children, and it is my understanding that there are no children in the Park Tower Apartments on Lafayette Street . Compare this to single fammly houses where the ratio is 2 . 5 children per house . If you will bear ith me , I would like to show the impact of the R-3 zoning as compared to single family zoning. Let ' s consider the 40-acre tract on which could be built 200 homes ; this would result in 500 school aged children at a cost to the city of $750 .00 per student , or $337, 500 .00 . For 200 homes selling between $35,000. and $40, 000 . yielding about $1 , 400. in taxes per house would result in tax revenue of $280, 000 . or a cost to the city in excess OF $50,000. per year, not to mention the resulting need of a new school . Compare this with 750 units renting at $200. to $250 . per month per unit which would result in tax revenue to the City in excess of $400, 000 . Subtract from that figure the cost of educating a maximum of 30 children based on a ratio of 4 children per 100 units at $750 . 00 per student of $22, 500 .00 . When we talk about the impact of utilities , we are talking primarily of drainage and sewerage disposal . We know as well as you do that the rezoning of land does not automatically grant the right to build. Definitive plans must be prepared and reviewed by the Planning Board, City Engineer, and meet with their approval as well as the Department of Natural Resources , the Mass . Department of Public Health, and our own Board of Health. Briefly, however, water and sewer pipes will be connected to Jefferson Avenue ; before any of the land on the Swampscott line can be developed sewerage pipes must be brought in along the railroad tracks . As to water drainage, the contours of the land show that all the water will drain away from the property adjacent to this area . We propose to drain the wet area, shown on the map and channel" it by drainpipes to the brook crossing Jefferson Avenue . According to Mr. Carter engineer for DiBiase Bros . ) the brook is of sufficient size to do the work without harm to the property of any other person. The entire project would take at least six years to complete . The complex would be built in three stages . Access would be by means of a new street off Jefferson Avenue and by Preston Road. As the area would become developed, *affic patterns would change so that no one area would carry the burden of e increased traffic . 3 - It is also highly probable that when this area becomes completely developed . the B & M Railroad would consider a train stop in this area which would be a natural to handle commuted traffic to Lynn and .Boston. *y client would also agree to build a pedestrian overpass to the Municipal golf course . As to the esthetic impact , I only ask that you take the train from Boston or walk along the first and third fairway of the golf course and look at the present condition of this area . It is truly an open blighted area . It can be developed to be one of the most attractive areas in our City. Oppositethis area: is.;perhaps the most picturesque view in Salem - - that of the Salem Golf Course . The area will provide for more open space than our zoning requires . Our zoning calls for one unit per 1000 square feet of lot area ; we would build one unit per 2000 to 2500 square feet . Within this complex, Mr. DiBiase would build swimming pools , tennis courts , recreation areas , and would also be willing to set aside a tract of land for recreation to be used by the inhabitants of the City. By experience and training, my client is competent in this field; as to his means , I refer you to the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank and the Salem Savings Bank. • ! i THOMAS BERUBE l!litt II{ �ttlPiit, � tt$$2itiz�PtfB ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN m JAMES GARRITY JANE LUNDREGAN • J WIt�T X1M�� GERALD McCARTHV Vl ]H GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 6.17.71 2. Approval and acceptance of minutes of last meeting. 3. Clarification of Talbot Subdivision plans for Horton Road. 4. Discussion of proposed changes in Zoning Ordinance with George Vallis. $- Copies of Board of Appeal decisions on recently heard petitions. 6. Notices of petitions to be presented to Appeals Board June 21, 1971. 7. Miscellaneous correspondence received since last meeting. • '0 j0 " � /tv .3� I ` a T' )�� UI•�. NTjtu of y�r/Ft�T A1TP1 THOMAS BERUBE 1111 t 1 �tlem, CL1 (AL`/NL44� ABBY BURNS T 11 ^ ) MICHAEL FREEMAN W"l lir MiIn ing Tivarb JA MES GARRITV JANE LUNDREGAN 7 -- (CIt� dull GEPALD McCARTHV P,. GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 6 . 17 • 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY This meeting was opened by the Chairman, Gerald T. McCarthy, at 7 : 30 P.M. Members present were George Nowak, Thomae borube , Abby burns , lad os Sod- oski .pnd Michael Freeman. Mr. Nowak moved that the minutes of the last meeting be approved and ac- cepter}, seconded by Mrs . Burns , and so voted. Mr. George Vallis , Counsel for developers Salem Acres , Inc . , and DiBiase Bros . appeared and thanked the members for taking the time to listen to him. The reason he came was to make a progress report of what his client is doing at Witchcraft Heights and Colonial Village , also , what he would like to do in the near future . He presented a proposal to the Board with regard to rezoning land off Marlborough Road and land off Jefferson Avenue and Loring Avenue . Mr. Vallis stated that before a decision could be reached as to the wisdom of rezoning these or any other areas , four questions or problems should be answered: fiscal impact , ,impact of utilities , transportation system �mpact , and esthetic impact , and proceeded to speak along these lines , utlying his clients ' proposals with regard to these four problems . In the Jefferson Avenue-Loring Avenue site there are approximately 100 acres of which they wish to have 40 acres rezoned for multi-family res- idences ; the Marlborough Road locus contains approximately 150 acres , portions of this they also hope may be rezoned to permit construction of multi family residences . These would be garden type apartment buildings , some of which might be town houses or condominiums ; this would be aimed at serving those who wish and can afford quality housing; at present the Zoning Ordinance per- mits one dwelling unit for each 1000 square feet of lot area in these R-3 districts ; the developers would build one unit for each 2000-2500 square feet of lot area ; they would build swimming pools, tennis courts , recrea- tion areas , and would also be willing to set aside a tract for recreation to be used by the inhabitants of this City. This project would take about six years and would be developed in three phases . Board Members questioned Mr. Vallis with regard to the proposals for developing the parcel off Jefferson, a known swampy area , . relative to a natural watershed. He said they propose to drain the wet area shown on the map and channel it by drainpipes to the brook crossing Jefferson Av- enue . According to their engineer, Mr. Carter, the brook is of sufficient size to do the work without harm to the property of any other person. Os far as the utilities are concerned, Mr. Vallis stated they are adequate to support the type of construction proposed . The City Engineer, Mr. Ralph Tedford, who was present at this meeting, affirmed this fact . Mr. Vallis pointed out that the property is an open, blighted area , really a mess , with gravel pits , boulders and trash; `' s_ 2 - A full copy of the Counselor ' s presentation is attached hereto , and for the �ecord, becomes an integral part of the minutes of this meeting. It was suggested to the City Engineer that the flood control areas in the City should be outlined on the Zoning maps , and he agreed. He further stated that the City has applied for funds from HUD in connection with the Flood Control Program. Counselor John Serafini appeared for Mr. Talbot , a client of his who is also a developer of subdi.vi.si.on on Horton Road. Mr. Talbot has submitted plan after plan with a different proposal each time , and the situation now is one of complete confusion for all involved. In fact , at a recent meet-. ing.,of this Board a proposal to rescind approval of the original Definitive plan was seriously discussed . Mr. Serafini stated that what the Board ac- tually approved, was installation of the roadway and the utilities , and since the plan was approved the utilities have been installed. and connec- tions made ; also , a few months ago , the City made a taking of approximately four thousand square feet of land on the right hand side of the road for the flood control project ; Mr. Talbot has installed a sewer up the hill and connected it but has not installed the drainage shown on the plan; this shall have to be done to comply with the Subidivision regulations . It was the general opinion of the Members and a motion made and carried to the effect that we notify the City Solicitor to draw up a Covenant to pro- tect the City , and insure the proper installation of ail utilities , road- way , etc . , as required by the Subdivision Control Law, and to incorporate 0nto said Covenant a stipulation that a certificate of occupancy shall be equired before any dwelling unit may be occupied, and the road must be finished before such certificate may issue , and when said Covenant has been drawn, approved , and the proper signatures affixed , this document shall be recorded at the Registry of Deeds . Copies of decisions on petitions brought to the Board of Appeal were presented to the meeting, and also , notices of new petitions to be heard by that Board on June 21 , 1971 . Miscellaneous correspondence brought to the meeting will be zeroxed and copies distributed to all members , . since the copier had broken down and this could not be attended to prior to this meeting. All business for the evening having been attended to , it was voted to adjourn at 9 : 55 P .M. Respectfully submitted, CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk 'l 'PRESENTATION MADE BY GEORGE VALLIS, COUNSEL FOR DI BIASE BROS. WITH REGARD TO REZONING PROPOSALS TO .THE CITY PLANNING BOARD, 6 .17 . 71 As you know, the demand for housing in this City, . this State , and the entire country is pressing and continues unabated. On November, 1.965 , the first house in Witchcraft Heights was sold and now six years later nearly 350. homes have been built and sold and the building continues. About three years ago , my client began construction of Colonial Village and now 2511 units have been rented and the building continues . There remains about 70 house logs :in Witchcraft Heights and plans have been formulated to erect an additional_ 80 apartment units in Colonial Village ; also , plans have begun to develop a mini-shopping area on Highland Avenue , similar to the shopping area :in Marblehead on Pleasant Street . Such a shooping area is permitted under our present zoning as a special use to complement the garden type apartment complex. It is hoped that construc- tion of this shopping area will begin within a year and it is expected that this area will include , among other things , a drug store , a barber shop, beauty parlor, restaurant , food store , gift shops , and professional offices . - I have had the good fortune in worl; .ng closely with Mr. Difliase during these years , and one thing he. has shown me during this. time is unlimited energy and courage and a lot of foresight . Salem will continue to grow and remain viable as long as there are people willing to plan and invest in its future . With land fast running out for large single family subdivision construc- tion, with prices for such single family homes growing out of the reach of the middle income family, and with land costs running into astronom- 0cal figures , Mr. DiBiase as a builder-plainer is attempting to turn to and develop new concepts in building. He is looking for apartment zoning for cluster development , and I would like to present my client ' s proposal for the development of lend in Wards 7 and 4 for the purpose of garden type apartments which may include town houses and condominiums . To begin with , construction of apartments requires apartment zoning. I submit to you that our present zoning is not responsive to our community needs for growth and progress and future possibilities. I have shown in our present zoning map the arezrs zoned for R-3, multiple family use , which is colored in red (here map was presented ) , my client ' s interest in the development for apartment use is the land which I have outlined in red stripes . In Ward 7 , my client owns approximately 100 acres of land of which he desires to rezone 1+0 acres into an 13-3 zone . This type of housing would be aimed at; serving those who wish and can afford quality housing, who want open space and do not want and can not manage the burdens of home maintenance . Before you can make any decision as to the wisdom of rezoning these areas or any other areas , there are four questions or problems which should be answered: FIRST, is the fiscal impact • SECOND, is the impact on utilities THIRD, is the transportation system impact , and FOURTH, is the esthetic impact . - 2 - Ari important point to consider in the fiscal impact is the fact that in this ; City last year, 38¢ of every dollar that was levied for real estate taxes ' wapplied to the schools . Compare this to 1964 when 28¢ of every dollar w4applied to schools . It is an established fact that apartment house dis- tracts do not produce as many school aged children as single family home developments . The market for apartments is based predominately on the smal- ler householder, the elderly, the childless , and the highly mobile couples . In this group we find young married couples who are both working and find garden type apartments a step toward home ownership. Older couples , whose children have grown, also tend towards garden apartments close to their children' s homes and with the increasing life expectancy, the number of older couples entering the apartments tends to increase . Garden type apart- ments are not conducive to the raising of children, for as the family grows , parents tend to leave apartments in favor of single family dwellings . As I stated earlier, there are presently 254 units in Colonial Village . There are only 6 school aged children living there . Of the 28 units in the newly built Continental Apartments on Lafayette Street , there are no children, and it is my understanding that there are no children in the Park Tower Apartments on Lafayette Street . Compare this to single fammly houses where the ratio is 2 . 5 children per house . If you will bear ith me , I would like to show the impact of the R-3 zoning as compared to single family zoning. Let ' s consider the 40-acre tract on which could be built 200 homes ; this would result in 500 school aged children at a cost to the city of $750 .00 per student , or $337 , 500 . 00 . For 200 homes selling between $35,000 . and $40 , 000 . yielding about $1 , 400. in taxes per house would result in tax revenue of $280 ,000 . or a cost to the city in excess of*50 , 000 . per year, not to mention the resulting need of a new school . Compare this with 750 units renting at $200. to $250 . per month per unit which would result in tax revenue to the City in excess of $400, 000 . Subtract from that figure the cost of educating a maximum of 30 children based on a ratio of 4 children per 100 units at $750 . 00 per student of $22 , 500 .00 . When we talk about the impact of utilities , we are talking primarily of drainage and sewerage disposal . We know as well as you do that the rezoning of land does not automatically grant the right to build. Definitive plans must be prepared and reviewed by the Planning Board, City Engineer, and meet with their approval as well as the Department of Natural Resources , the Mass . Department of Public Health, and our own Board of Health. Briefly, however, water and sewer pipes will be c.onnected to Jefferson Avenue ; before any of the land on the Swampscott line can be developed sewerage pipes must be brought in along the railroad tracks . As to water drainage , the contours of the land show that all the water will drain away from the property adjacent to this area . We propose to drain the wet area shown on the map . and channel it by drainpipes to the brook crossing Jefferson Avenue . According to Mr. Carter engineer for DiBiase Bros . ) the brook is of sufficient size to do the work without harm to the property of any other person. The entire project would take at least six years to complete . The complex would be built in three stages . Access would be by means of a new street off Jefferson Avenue and by Preston Road . As the area would become . developed, t fic patterns would change so that no one area would carry the burden of t increased traffic . It is also highly probable that when this , area becomes completely developed the B & M Railroad would consider a train stop in this area which 'would be a natural to handle commuted traffic to Lynn and Boston. i 10 client would also agree to build a pedestrian overpass to the Municipal golf course . As to the esthetic impact , I only ask that you take the train from Boston or walk along the first and third fairway of the golf course and look at the present condition of this area . It is truly an open blighted area . It can be developed to be one of the most attractive areas in our City. Opposite this area is perhaps the most picturesque view in Salem - - that of the Salem Golf Course . The area will provide for more open space than our zoning requires . Our zoning calls for one unit per 1000 square feet of lot area ; we would build one unit per 2000 to 2500 square feet . Within this complex, Mr. DiBiase would build swimming pools , tennis courts , recreation areas , and would also be willing to set aside a tract of land for recreation to be used by the inhabitants of the City. By experience and training, my client is competent in this field; as to his means , I refer you to the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank and the Salem Savings Bank. I, of $Ulem11THOAS , "4lassar uses o ABBY BURNS BERUBE MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY ylttitnjn"' ISGIXb JANE LUNDREGAN ct�s, y QOUI T -- CtU �igII GERALD M.CARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 7 . 1 . 71 RAYMONO SWEENEY This meeting was called to order by Chairman Gerald McCarthy at 7 : 35 P.M. with Members Thomas Berube , Abby Burns , Michael Freeman, Jane Lundregan, George Nowak, Tadius Sadoski and Raymond Sweeney present . ' Minutes of prior meeting accepted as read except for section of last line that "the Board agreed with Vallis that area is a mess" . There were mem- bers of the Board who agreed with this , but the Board did not take this position. A Form A application and plan presented in behalf of Omer Robert Talbot , Trustee, concerning the joining of Lots X and W into one lot on one side .of Horton Road, andLotsY and Z on the other side of Horton Road into one lot . The motion was made by Raymond Sweeney and seconded, that the plan be endorsed subject to the conditions of a Form C definitive plan approved by the Board on January 8 , 1969; all present voted in favor. A second Form A application and plan of land at #10 Sylvan Street , owner Mary Lettich was presented for endorsement . Upon motion by Abby Burns and seconded by Raymond Sweeney, it was voted to endorse the plan as not •constituting a subdivision and upon the existence of a variance granted by the Appeals Board in this matter. A motion was made by Raymond Sweeney and seconded by Thomas Berube that only one meeting a month be held during July and August . Meeting was adjourned at 7 : 55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, C Y PL NING BOAR , Clerk NOTE: Minutes approved and accepted at August 5, 1971 meeting with the recommendation that it be noted that Michael Freeman had not been present at the July 1, 1971 meeting as mentioned in the first paragraph above . • s� • U v ! v _ � � 7 -y �� v' u� � THOMAS lilLa«� �vU �{.�LLI��Lii� ABBY BURNS UBE o� 7 � MICHAEL FREEMAN Ii �ttltntnl� �.�,F7 varb JAMES GARRITV P �µ JANE LUND REG AN �Raom 7 -- CtU all GERALD MCCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI 7 . 1 - 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - - CITY PLANNING BOARD - - 7 . 1 . 71 1 . Form A application and plan, Mary Lettich, 10 Sylvan Street , ( Counselor John R. Serafini) Form A application RG plan - Talbot , Horton Road (J. Serafini) 2 . Minutes of Last meeting. 3 . Sign minutes of June 3, 1971 meeting. 4 . Copy of letter to Mr. Pitcoff regarding Covenant with • Narcisse Talbot , Horton Road Subdivision. 5 . Copy of letter to Mayor Zoll regarding Winter Island Road Property. 6 . Copies of Board of Appeal decisions . 7 . Correspondence and literature , copies for all Members . • Civ of ttiem, 'fflttszar4use##s • ��,�.-,, , � �Ittlutitmg,�uxrD Dtitu Pail �alew,�[assacltusetts 0197D NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO "'vnW- FORM "A"APPLICATIONS evo, See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: City Clerk a Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ---#1©--sylvan_ft"tr---------------__—_ --------�4alem,--Massachu&etM-------------------- in Ward ----------------------------------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) / Y LE7ICH, by: - Signature of Owner __ __! �___ _____ ____ ______ --------- -- ---- ------- ------------ --i - -------- hn R. Ser ni, Es We Street Address ---_E -b21 �Vash#ngton-� -------------------------------------- City/I'own&State---Salem,_Uassachit setts---0197_D__________________________ Telephone Number -----------------7$4=$21$-Or-744-=$213----------------------- S ; Cite PA _ ,�a1wtt, ,9Ulassacltuseffs D1970 m FORM A �. APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT UCo y OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE N APPROVAL vw In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the UJ L o -J-j applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ....June-2,9-------------------------1921-- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within ���thte meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. I1-A and • state specific reasons) the-JO Mange__-e-xistedl-as_shown_on the attached_plan,__for__ _ poli-Gjbjy__the_fa$t_one_hundred__C100j__y-ears_with frontage_on said_Syiv_an__S_treet, Salemt_Massachuaett8,_a_public_waa situated_in said Salem. A variance has already__beenMINE granted by__the Board Appeals to_permit the transfer of Lot A and Lot B 1600 } --- - - plan fora determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I. Name of Owner Maly__L9!V*0h_____. Address -----f610 Sylyan 3treet,_Salem__e_Mase_ _ _--_--------------------- 2. ----_ _---___ _____2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ---F.BSSX-$Urvey-Seer+rice,__Inc-•--------------------------__-_------- Address_ 47_Federal_Street,__Salemj_Maee,_____________ 3. Deed of property records in -Essex-$outh_DSBtrlct-------------------------- Registry Book ------------------------------ Page -------------------------------- 4. ---------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ------Sy1V-an__StrP,et,-_Salem,--.Massachusetts-------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of-the Owners of the abutting lots. (-MARY LETTJ, $ b Signature of Owne nj JS f - ------- Address cAo_126 _shin ton Street, Sal ,_Maes4e .__ --------------------- Telephone Num ---_ 744-0212 or 744 -213-------------------- ---- SYL VAil/ S7AWET r /00" BS.DO ..Y.... Trtmoq f St ....... ....... - s� 90'00'00" g9°S0 03" ..z0.s'........ .f'ofh/een N1 v ,L oT o v ,Lord f%f9�bbo�s : A:4sG0 fsF �o„� `ts7ozaisF M NON BFMgSs90 ROBERT yam, v B BA a. .± �4Pon suev�-� iY/ory /Y1. W 31.25........ .. gb°fig.�/'' Q./•°SQW°. ♦ � '•30.43 ....i ': 56.3.7 1 •... B7oo l'Yo/fcr B. -- Q/onchc F ✓ohn S. �Nlorion F. (s'oodrrou/f Piebk Ill 1047diPws q�oro✓o/u i fhe Set, diYisraz7 L'oir/ro/ �osv roof r� uii�' u�r PLAN ' of LAND ' SALEM PL9NN/hCG .G"{�A.PD in �. SAIL EM • - Properfy of M ry Leff/ch Scale I20 ' ✓u�P 2/ /97/ Lbfe.• I ESSEX S41RVEY SFE'✓/CE 1W.. � 47 Federal Street So/em R 5381 SYL it/ Jr'T.PEET Ti�inon f Sf ....... ....... AG w. yvaobo" 99'.S94-4 r 9/"4900. ..- za.Z=r-•--� f Ala eIla A. ,Buxton J ,Y ti Dared W i Kofh/men M. ,LOT Q Fi f9lbbo/rs =4560+s.Fkoro ki 4L ` W � 1 2��P�ZN OF �ASS9cH h ,..../• V o ROBERT No. 18887 LNSRtsuFyoQ W ol /19ory / lV it7e//O i ......_.....37.25........ a��zear~ d7^sa:z3„ 54 SG.6.7 ' 1' i . . -.,x.43 ....' ...•' B .oa . .... 7 Liar " !j/orrch� F !ya/fir B. John AM j(NJorion F. - Goodioa/f Prebk III ,Qndrerrs .4�oro✓o/uwvAi /ihe S'u�yisrorr A 'ori/ro/ ,(osr� trot�urifd ur,�r PLA/V, of L A MD Cop r1/, Sec B/ SALE P/�XNIiK<r CAPD .n SALEM - Property of _ t Mary Lefti�'h scale: I = 20 " ✓ure 2/ /97/ ESSEX SURVEY SSWICE /NC. 47 Federn/ Street; Sa/efi 5381 Sn liAN ST,PEET f_ /00 fo 83.00 ....... 4/.s0 -e6 90'00X00' B9°.•f04S�• Noc�A. "Buxton �� ...10.5"�....... tea•'` I�� .('ofh/oen M. v v LT Q or 0 o � Fi fyibbons A=4560{S.F Gom '9-70.20ts.F• � qj OF MASs9�ti 0 •...../' V o ROBERT oN h g B. h 0� ..... SND SURV iYlory M. ! W tile/% -fa 6.7 1 '•30.43 ....' ..::: Bloc {Yo/fer B. John .S{NJoriori F. Coodirou/f r�/�b•F 27 ,QndrPws /l�ororo/urro/Pi 1he 9aYisrbr! C'o�fr0/ �osv aof r� uii� ur,�^r 6U. 6hP .4/,secei7' PLA of LAND S"ALEH in SA4 EM - _ Properfyr of Mary Le ffich Scale: l 20 " ✓ur7e 2/ /97/ Lb/e: ESSEX ,SURVEY SWOCE /NC. { 47 Federal smee7' Sa/ere 538/ of Salem, f flassarhusetts .s Planning Pandr CHU pall Salem, �lassacfittsetts 01970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL A V In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the o y applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a > � = Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- _ N r mission for such determination. The notice shall be Uj w.ua attached to two copies of this Form A application. Uj Cr. _ v a The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem Mass. July 1, — ------------19K 1---- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) Permission_is_sought_to_combine_Lots_X_and_W and Y and_Z_as they appear_on_a_plan filed_with_y_our Board, into_two__(2)_lots " 1"-and_ '2"1_as_ shown_on the accompany_ing_plan. --This is in accordance with the Board of — ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- Appeals'_permission ---- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner _Q er__Bobs'rS_T.dlbot"_Tnlstee------------------------------------------------------------- Address 1_Laure�rt_Road,_Salem,__Massachusetts ----_ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _ Edwin T Brudzynski-------------------------------------------------------- _ ____ ___ ___ ________ _______ Address __26-0_Lafay_ette_Street, Salem, Massachusetts 3. Deed of property records in __--Essex-South_Di5trigt------------------------ Registry Book --------------------------------------- Page -------------------— Location and Description of Property:property situated.-ori_Horto11_Road-in-,S_alem,-_____ Massachusetts_as_show-n_on_aaid_p-lan.- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown o . -Plan tog er with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner =- -- ---- ---/f- ---- ------- - Address------ --- / ---- - --- -------- ---------- Telephone Number ----------------�^^ --_-- -------- - - - -------- ; I COVENANT OF DEVELOPER i WHEREAS , Narcisse A. Talbot and Ida M. Talbot are the owners of 1 certain parcels of land shown as Lots 1 & 2 on a plan entitled: "Plot Plan, 1 Lots 1 & 2, Horton Road (named Laurent Road, Salem,Mass., Scale 1 in. 20 ft. , and dated June, 1971 , Edwin T. Brudaynski, Registered Surveyor" , which plan was endorsed by the Planning Board of the City of Salem on July l; 1971, and which plan is to be recorded with the Essex South District Registry. ` of Deeds, and W HERE AS , development of said Lots 1 & 2 will be undertaken by • Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee, and 0 W H E R E A S , the said Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee, is applying for a building permit to construct multi-family dwellings on said Lots 1 & 2 as shown. on said plan above referred to, and WHEREAS , in consideration of the issuance of said permits by the Building Inspector of the City of Salem, the said Narcisse A. Talbot, Ida M. Talbot and Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee, have agreed to the following.terms and conditions: NOW , therefore in consideration of the issuance of the building permit on said Lots 1 & 2;the said Narcisse. A. Talbot, Ida M. Talbot and Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee hereby covenant and agree with the City of Salem as follows: 1 . That they will install sewer and water lines in accordance with profile plan dated June 14, 1965 by Carter & Towers Engineering Corp.; Swampscott, Mass. , and will install the said utilities in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer of the City of Salem; JOHN R. SERAFINI 2. That they will cause to be constructed as the work progresseE ATTORNEY AT LAW - 126 WASHINGTON ST. a road servicing Lots 1 & 2 in accordance with the requirements as set forth SALEM, MASS. ron the above described plan which has been approved and endorsed by the • Planning Board of,the City of Salem; 3. That the said Narcisse A. Talbot, Ida M. Talbot and Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee agree that prior to the sale, transfer or occupancy I of any of the units'.or buildings constructed on said Lots that they will request and obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Inspector of the City of Salem, and that thei said Narcisse A. Talbot, Ida M. Talbot and Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee further agree that this Certificate of Occupancy shall be a condition precedent tO the sale, transfer or occupancy of any of the units so constructed. I The necessity of obtaining this Certificate of Occupancy, howev, from the Building Inspector of the City of Salem, shall not apply to any financin or mortgaging of the lots in question for construction purposes. 0 In the event of a mortgage foreclosure, the mortgagee shall be permitted to sell at a foreclosure sale and without regard to the covenants con- tained in this document; provided, however, that any resale by any purchaser 0 at such foreclosure shall be subject to the terms and conditions contained in this document. The covenants and agreements contained in this document shall be deemed satisfied in full on the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the' Building Inspector of the City of Salem for the dwellings to be constructed on Lots 1 & 2 as shown on said plan above referred to dated June, 1971 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Narcisse A. Talbot, Ida M. Talbot, ane Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee, have caused this document to be signed and. execi; ted on this day of August , 1971. Narcisse A. Talbot, individually; /s/ Narcisse A. Talbot City of Salem Planning Board, Ida M. Talbot by: /s/ Id2IM. Talbot JOHN R. SERAFINI /s/ Gerald T. McCarthy ] ATTORNEY AT LAW Omer Robert Talbot, Trustee . 126 WASHINGTON ST. SALEM. MASS. Approved as to form: /s/ Omer Robert Talbot /s</ Albert R. Pitcoff Albert R. Pitcoff, City Solicitor tl 0tv of '�$a lrnt, 'Mttssar4usetts Planning ' Avarb - ► ,e3 (gag pall w '15alem, 'AIsssachuseits 1319711 a+1 er � ca C rV - NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO y, FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: __Jud 2 6_ 1971 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at the_ corner of Essex and - -------------------------------------------- Orange_ --- eStreets - - -a - --- ---------- in Ward ---- 1 ------- ------- -- (insert street and street numbers here) Signature of OwnerFede (`�` - ral Stye et V Street Address -----1-- - ----- ------ a - - - - — - - Salem Mass . City/Town&State- ---------------------------------------------------------------—- Telephone Number __7 4 5-2 3 8 5 ---------------------- • caw of �$ttlem, fflassttdjusetts Planning Puxrb a � _ �aleny ,�[assacltusetis D197Q W FORM A N a N w APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT ,fF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE m w APPROVAL U yt Iry accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the a4licant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -------July_26-i-------------------19-71- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) No new streets_ are shown and_2 _dwelli_ngs...sfiown........ existed on one lot...prior _to zoning_law enactment in ---the Cites ---- ------- of Salem, --- ------- ---- - ----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ----lames-_A.-Bath lay--------------------- —----------------------------- Address -___12 0Federal__Street,_Salem; Mass-------------_____--_-----------___ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----Ess ex__Sur_vey-__Sery ce_Inc_ __________ Address_4 7 _Federal St r e e t _ _,_ S a 1 em,_ M ass__ ____--_-------___-- 3. Deed of property records in -------Es-sex--- outh----------------------------------- Registry Book - -3574-------------- -- Page ----8.8---------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ---2---1 o ts__o--f__1 and...... o t__1---c onta.ing--__-_____ 82-33----s_d._ ft_._ and_ located---at---81---Essex---St_.-_a t__-tfie---c:Qxa_er---o£---0r_ang.e St . and plot_--- 2 lo_oated at-_3 Orange St. contajning_333_$ sda _£t.__and--- abutting----tot---1---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner------ , - ---- _r_alStreet_,__Sa..lem_,__ass-- --.._------_ Telephone Number ----- 74S- 270S --_ --45- 2385 ----- --------- ------- ------------- f Froxis /� Po,�orski 4w Lor 2 `1 W `•..... ,✓e?'4BAj ?p~E 5 o e tri. Sk A:g,233ts F -, Q i c ted/ Q 76.44 ESSE�C STiE'EET /I��oro✓q/andci fisc Su6drr/s�c� ' Coutio/.(nsr�naf/,eyuirer�u�cr _ - elv,a 4/6:.C, see B/P. sq� ,�t,ovu;�vs .Bvoev PLAN of LAND S.4L EM . Proo�erfy of ' James Aai/eye7gux. ' /]� 4 u/JCC.• SWle— /"= 30' April 7,� 1971 ESSEX SURYEr SEev/CE /NG. i 47 Federal Street So%m r IL ve ° J 1 rtrr it 1/ »i tt22t� {/�tt¢�f1T+ THOMAS BERUBE i'1 µlEA`I� .JuDDu�L1.li7JL*4� ABBY BURNS • 7 1 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN • e� e Inmm�� 7IIGIX� JAMES GARRITY 9Ac9 JANE LUNDREGAN Y q.MTo�'S' �toum 7 -- IOU PULL GERALD A GEORGE NO NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - g 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY Prior to the formal opening of this meeting, two Form �A applications were received with a plan of land at 25 and 27 Sable Road for endorsement . Owners Joel Selznick and John Brooks by mutual agreement are exchanging small areas of land and straightening a mutual boundary line; the owner of #25 will receive an additional 20.00 ' frontage in exchange for a 20 .88 ' width parcel at the rear of his property. On motion of Mr. Freeman, sec- onded by Mr. Berube , it was voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. A second Form A application and plan presented in behalf of James A. Bailey showed a parcel of land at the corner of Essex and Orange Streets , formerly one lot with two existing dwellings; owner wishes to establish a boundary line between the two structures , and presented a copy of a decision from the Board of Appeals granting a variance with regard to lot area and set- back requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance . On motion of Mr. Freeman, seconded by Mr. Berube, this plan was endorsed also as not requiring ap- proval under the Subdivision Control Law. • Chairman Gerald McCarthy called the meeting to order at 7: 45 P.M. , with all members present excepting Jane Lundregan. Revised minutes of the May 20th meeting were approved and accepted. Revised minutes of the June 17+x' meeting were approved and accepted. Minutes of the last meeting, held on July 1, were approved and accepted, with the recommendation that a notation be affixed to said minutes that Mr. Michael Freeman who is listed among those present , had not attended that meeting. Requests for rezoning of land on Marlborough Road, and also , land at the rear of Jefferson Avenue to R-3 districts to permit construction of apart- ment buildings at both locations , were received at this meeting, with plans of said land areas and a letter of transmittal . Counselor George Vallis appeared and explained to the Members the reasons these requests are being made in behalf of his clients , DiBiase Bros . A discussion followed pres- entation of these requests , and on motion of Mr. Sadoski, seconded by Mr. Garrity, the members voted to have copies of the proposals and accom- panying plans made by the secretary and distributed to Members for their study prior to the next Board meeting. Also in connection with these plans , Mr. Sadoski requested that the secre- tary inquire as to the possibility tY of copies of the Camp, Dresser, McKee report on Flood Control for the South River, Salem, being available . Letters from the office of the City Clerk were read to the meeting; these 2 - had to do with a meeting rescheduled for 7: 00 P.M. on August 24 with the City Councillors and a representative of the Department of Public Works for the purpose of discussing the federally aided Highway System Network proposal . . copy of a Covenant between the City of Salem Planning Board and Narcisse A. Talbot was received with an accompanying letter from the City Solicitor, in accordance with the Subdivision Control Laws relating to subdivision to insure proper installation of roadways , utilities , etc . , in the Horton (Laurent ) Road subdivision. A letter from the City Engineer with regard to dwellings and businesses which . may be displaced if the contemplated I-95 connector routes become reality, was brought to this meeting; copies of this will be zeroxed and forwarded to all board members . A Form C application and three copies of a Subdivision Plan entitled "Highland Acres , Street Names - First Street ; Owner Highland Realty Trust , Scale - Horiz 1"=401 , Scale Vert 1"=41 ; Essex Survey Services , Inc . , " plan does not bear a date ) were brought to this meeting. Counselor John R. Serafini appeared and explained the purpose of the plan. Plan shows a proposed roadway off Highland Avenue , ending in a turnaround on developer' s property with an area marked Lot 1 , containing 9 . 58± acres; land abutting the other side of the proposed street , also indicated as property of this developer, Highland Realty Trust , is indicated as Lot ' 2 , containing 10 .0± acres; his client is being financed through the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency which requires that 25% of the dwelling units be 'made available for low-cost housing; in connection with parcel 2 , referred to as Lot 2 , it contains approximately ten acres and is under contract to the Salem Housing Authority, and this will help alleviate the problem of the waiting list they have . A public hearing s been held in the Council Chamber, and the State Housing has approved is particular site ; the Mayor and several Councillors endorsed the plan to build 100 plus units by the Salem Housing Authority which they would own; bonds for the construction have been authorized by the State and approval has -been given. It is proposed that 250 units will be constructed on Lot 1 . Mr. Sadoski moved that the Board hold a public hearing on September 2 , 1971, with regard to this Form C application of Highland Realty Trust , on the pro- vision that the developer will have delivered to all Board Members by the 23rd of August , definitive Form C plans ; the hearing to be held at the regu- lar meeting place of the Planning Board, the Health Center Building at 5 Broad Street , commencing at 7 : 30 P.M. ; motion seconded by Mr. Sweeney, and with all in favor so moved. Chairman Gerald McCarthy reported that he had submitted the recently com- pleted zoning map to the City Engineer, Mr. Tedford, and was in receipt of his recommendations with regard to errors on this map . Members voted to submit this map to Carter and Towers again, and have it conform to the zon- ing amendments . By 9: 20 P .M. all business having been attended to , it was voted to adjourn this meeting. Respectfully submitted, C)"• / „ I� CITY ObLANNINCr BOARD, Clerk THOMAS BER 1�1Tti ` �TIPTTI, ,v".4lGlS1Gi� 4tL4TJ ABBY BURNS UBE ` .y.�r J,. MICHAEL FREEMAN A❑AttttYTtTI� IIMX.0 JAMES GARRITY • �s� .'.�,µ ?9 •�L+ l JANE LUNDREGAN °Ums. QUlitJ -- �IIlt�iktll GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK _ TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA FOR CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING 7:00 P.M. - Form A application and plan of land on 27 Sable Road, ` and 25 Sable Road, Joel Selznick, John Brooks . - Form A application and plan of land Essex and Orange Streets , James Bailey. ✓ 7 : 30 P.M. - Revised Minutes of May 20th meeting. / Revised minutes of June I hmeeting.✓ Minutes of last meeting, July 1st . -✓ 1 . Requests from office of George P. Vallis , Esq. , for 2econsider- ation of rezoning district in rear of Jefferson Avenue and also, Marlborough Road area . 2 . Form C application and plan to be presented by John R. Serafini ,*** Esq. , in behalf of Highland Realty Trust . • 3. Letter from office of City Clerk re-Meeting of Committee of the Whole , Aug. 10 4. Letter from office of City Clerk canceling above . 5. Letter from office of City Clerk Re-meeting at 7: 00 P.M. Aug. 24 with Mr. Kenneth Wilman, representative of DPW. 6 . Letter from Dept . of Community Affairs . 7 . Letter from City Engineer, Ralph Tedford regarding displacing effects of I-95 connectors . 8 . Notice of Board of Appeal hearings , and decisions on other pe- titions by said Board. 9 . Miscellaneous correspondence . *** Covenant re-land of Talbot on Laurent Road with accompanying letter from City Solicitor; this was received after the agenda for this meeting was made up . ) • THE FOLLOWING IS/ARE THE BEST IMAGES FROM POOR QUALITY ORIGINALS) IM /A-�C&L DATA • ;_; ' SSS??? Poarb of Appeal DTL'X53C0N Uta PETITION O. \MES A. BAILEY FOR VARIANCE FROM ,_p-*"QABI;j; ;jSlj•Y REQI t ,tEMENTS OF CITY ZONING ORDI`7ANCE /tFMOTIgG LAND AND EXISTING STRICTURES THEREON AT 81 ESSEX 34.=-T Arra 3 ORANGE STREET . tioner appeals — to the Boar t • t y r „`rdinance as it affects ex . al ,nq � • t n r ,, • + ar * •. and 1No Stroot . : } woo hold an thio npptal on .:u /? 1 . � _ •wr'r ;d postpaid to the petitioner , o .r (t •:uvortipeceAta published in the tin t• i h.:aring. .mord members were present except ,n,• Mi . . •,yie L, : Mr. + tioncr appeared and explained tl.e c. • t same ca �l an €ilea property consists of 0110 .,t• ,. I of ' ' "I ,••I aro located; the structures wt re - 1 , ' 0•i ' ,n} 1` ` A±z-,PSjon of zoning regulations.; owner . I I , < r '. • I-rj purposes, having more than on.3 0 w 1 . Iler ' . VoAtaces; there is ample purkine fot it II y ono appeared in oppoyl , ion. gaard admbers atgdied tt,e fair is I e E e• . i c . v r, ,,.f land which had been submLlto It .:-,fir,tbt.ra found that to grant a v:. • o pLtitioner in ostabllahing pat "I r_dory linea for each exist,nr I ` ,it jr-" a tch var sail. ti in no hay deror.r,t ,3 ft .•T • .l t:tratturen ald m3lny " =able + ited . ots and . - • ctI for thene reasons , voted cnd advise petitionAr co 0 LAUm " x tn`aoi'bement as not requ l I I no GRi;NTEDt 31I1 rl � ry ICs n : Ctv of Sttlextc, ttsstttl#�tse##s planning pouri7 @Iitg pall ,Salem, 'Masssshusetts 91970 :U W 4 ON a � N S W � Y NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO W N y FORM "A"APPLICATIONS t" See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: __–---Ju6B 2-6' 1971- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970. • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan Sled with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ---- 2_ZSable Road_ -----—– – — – – – --------------- in Ward --------------------------------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) (� Signature of Owner ---------- - ----- ------- ---� ---- - ------ YJ Street Address ------------ -----�------ u__–------- (_ Cityown&State-------------- - ----- _r--------- Telephone Number ---------------- - - -- ----- ----------------------------- A ?f (2lit� >xfIEm, ttssttclase## Qlitg Pall A .V ,4alem,,Alassac4untts 91970 = U. FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT Z) OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE 07 L APPROVAL ca U_j In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a ,y Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed Q S in ink. 7/ Z671 Salem, Mass. --------Jun@I1----------------------19---- To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons)=_-All requirements_ of zoning laws and building code c have been complied with -- --------- ---- --------- --------- -------- -------------------------------—--- -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner - Joel L. Selznick and Arlene B. Selznick -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address-___27Sable Road, Salem, Massachusetts -- - - - -- --- - -- -- ------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or S e or — C— ----arter-------&----Tower Engineering Corp. Address ------------------------------------------------- ----- Fairview Avenue , Swampscott, Massu usetts — -- ------- —- ---------------- — — — ------------------------ 3. Deed of property records i __Essex___0outhgmDistrict)_ __-_ Registry Book -------577--------------- -- Page ------r►�5---- ----- ----- 4. Location and Description of Property: See attached. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on PI n gether t names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner---------- - - --------- - _ 1 !� Address Z7--- 7- ---------- - --- - ` Rc//0 Telephone Number ---------------------- ---�`----- —7 - 3-------------- (f itg of '$Ilan, f ttssar4usetts (gag Pall Salem, ,ARassashuseits a147a ze >U Q o a) y C �2 Q cr) rc NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO W ut&u '-o Cj Q FORM "A"APPLICATIONS ti >dA t See Form "A" applications for gal complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: -----Junkt-Y24_ 1971 ----- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. S The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at _______25_____able___R _oad__---------------_----- ----------------------—- - --------------------------- in Ward -------------------------------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) Signature of Owner -------QQ Street Address ---96-----S-0p-"-''t7------"'/� e----------- - ------ City/Town& State---�1-&-&--- _---- rt------ --------- ----------------------------------- Telephone Number -----7s -2Z-7 • Ctv of Safra, ttosttc se##s . � �IttztninS �uxrd (gag Pau �aletty ,9U[assacliusefts D1D70 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the U. applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a C) 'u� Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- j rn ung mission for such determination. The notice shall be Uy attached to two copies of this Form A application. Uj The notice and both copies of the application must cc cc o be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one ^' > copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the .cy Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. 5/S Salem, Mass., ---------June---- '-----------19--71- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not . constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdi 'Sion C ntrol law becaus ( ee c . II-A and states specific All requ__i__r__e__m___e_n_t_s_ o zoning aws andbuic�ing code P ) - - - ---have been complied with -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law 's n re u ed. 1. Name of Owner ----John )}. ° roCs and Gail G. Brooks -------- --------- - --------------------------- 25 Sable Road;--Salem$ Massachusetts Address-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- Carter & Tower Engineering Corp. 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address- _________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Address_____6_ Fairview Avenue, Swampscott, Massachusetts - - - - - - - - --- Essex (Southern District 3. Deed of property records in __ ________________________________ _- Registry 5726 383 Book ----- - --- ----SPage ---------------------------- 4. Location and Description Property:tion of Pro rt ------- -ee attached. - - ------ed - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. s Signature of Owner � ��' '�-�--� Address 2oC'C -es�------ —-------------------- Telephone NumberS_-__9-227-7------------------...----------------- - RESUBDIVISION PLAN • SALEM MASS. BELONGING TO F JOHN R. BROOKS a JOEL SELZNICK SCALE 1 °= 40' 6/ 10/71 CARTER & TOWERS .ENGINEERING' CORP. _ ,. 6 FAIRVIEW AVE: SWAMPSCOTT„ MASS.. a h ,1 277 No 276 N. X75 1� .ea e I tJ i a7 30 . •\ > 11,532 s.F e �� 12 �,• �!S Fw — 514 3' �Co�1p7 ec 11 258 ►�° 186 _• 000 S.F �+ I �-�494 L _ l O m 2880 0 273 '�►^25 ^�`27 ip.es \zags 1 SABLE ROAD „I,cawip., 1/�'Tt y} �y �{ yy, ��F�,�y{�y Q�} /(��*Qp Q THOMAS BERUBE Tito of "SaIrm, �".LIassar uset Y ABBY BURNS I `J r:() 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN hanning 7 oarb JAMES GARRITY • �s3o-. yg ”' C� �l P2111JANE LUNDREGAN �UpVF. UOITI T -- YlitlI GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING- 9 . 2 .71 Four Form A applications and plans were brought to the meeting for endorse- ment : #1 - Salem Redevelopment Authority, presented by Counselor George P. Vallis , in behalf of the Authority; plan showed land at the corner of New Derby and Lafayette Streets to be conveyed to the City of Salem, providing the locus for the proposed new fire station. On motion of Abby Burns, seconded by George Nowak, the members voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the subdivision control law. #2 - Robert E. Warner application and plan, submitted for endorsement by Counselor John R. Serafini, showed land with existing structures at 8-82' -10 Hawthorne Boulevard; Michael Freeman moved, seconded by Abby Burns, that this plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the Subidivision control Law, with all in favor, this was voted approved. #3 - The third plan showed a swimming pool held in joint ownership between Walter Pecevich and Gordon Alley, 5 - 9 Winter Island Road; the pur- pose of this plan was to convey pool area and land surrounding same to Gordon Alley, owner of land and structures at 5 Winter Island Road. Thomas Berube moved that this plan be endorsed as not requiring Subdiv- ision approval , seconded by George Nowak, and with all infavor, this was voted approved. #4 - DeIulis Bros . Construction submitted the fourth application and plan, which showed a proposed change in a turnaround at Lots 26 and 27 See- more Street ; Michael Freeman, seconded by Thomas Berube , moved that this plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law, and with all in favor, this was endorsed also. Board members present at this meeting included Chairman Gerald McCarthy, Jane Lundregan, Abby Burns , Thomas Berube , George Nowak, Michael Freeman, and non-voting associate member Michael Chandler. Mintues of last meeting were approved and accepted on motion of George Nowak. A letter received from the office of Pearl , McNiff and Crean, relating to a complaint of a client of theirs regarding the Witchcraft Heights development , was held over at request of Counselor McNiff to Chairman Gerald McCarthy, until next Board meeting. The zoning map, received today from the firm of Carter & Towers Engineers who prepared same , will be forwarded to the City Engineer for his study and counsel . • An order from the City Council regarding "Urban Systems Network" was received; this had to do with the City Engineer and the Planning Board considering in- 4�lusion of other roadways in need of improvements in addition to those pre- sent'ed_ at the Council meeting of August 24, 1971 by the State Department of 2 •1. Public Works . The only street involved at this time is Washington Street , ` from Lafayette . to Bridge Street . The project is expected to get underway in 1990 . letter received from the City Engineer was read to the meeting; this was with regard to "as built plans" presented to Mr. Tedford by Salem Acres , Inc,: , as requested by, this Board when Counselor George Vallis requested release of certain sums held as security from the developer to 'the Planning Board. 'In . conjunction with the letter from the City Engineer, Mr. Vallis who was pres- ent at this meeting addressed the Board, presenting a written request for release of security in the amount of $42,000.00, presently held for devel- . opments specified in Mr. Tedford ' s letter. "Mr. Vallis statedihe would-,ex plain his. request after the close of the Public Hearing advertised to com- mence at 8: 00 P.M. This Public Hearing has to .do with .plans brought to the last meeting of the Board b'y `a Representative of Highland. Realty Trust , held. on August 5 , at which time this was decided) • PUBLIC HEARING: The Public Hearing was begun promptly at 8:00 P.M. - Chairman Gerald McCarthy stated that a Public Hearing is now open regarding a definitive plan .of Highland Avenue Realty Trust, and requested those who wish to speak in favor of the plan be heard first . Counselor John Serafini introduced himself, representing the developer and owners of the property known as Highland Realty. Trust , and produced two sheets as the linenplan of the proposed road and turnaround, said road to. be constructed off Highland Avenue : Mr. Serafini stated that one of the reasons for the speed inwhich he was able to get the work done on this. plan, since the last 'board meeting, is because of the need of—the projected buildings; Lot •#2 is ander agreement to the 0 Salem Housing Authority, and will provide 100 low-rental units to be rented y them; Lot #1 is under agreement with Pequot Housing for 250 units , 25% of which will be made available. to the Salem .Housing Authority, ..who 'wi,ll provide the rent supplements necessary so that people will be able to reside there who now reside in low-income-housing. Mr. Serafini: - "I think .all of you are aware there is a .current waiting list of five hundred on the Salem Housi"ng Authority records; they. could have come to state their own case ; but .we .felt it is" a well known fact . The Mayor has appeared in favor of the housing to be constructed on" Lot #2 , and the plans have already been approved; approval from the State has already been - received, and 'the project is a definite one insofar as - Salem is concerned. Until, the Salem Planning Board acts on this plan, we can not go to, the State for the tiein withyHighland Avenue ,, ,th'e City Engineer will, go there with me and tell them' this Board has approvedsit=..�� We, hada final meeting with the City Engineer yeste'iday; +in his vreport oto• you, hes*tates the plan".can be- ap- proved, e•- approved,' containing the following endorsements "The following conditions" shal'1 apply--to this plan: 1 . Slope -easments ast`requi'red ,by the 'City Engineer for road maintenance . 2. No building permit to be issued' until approval from the Department of. Public . Works has "been obtained for Highland . Avenue connection of road. " 'The Statuteprovides 20-day minimum waiting period from the time the plan is approved, so there would be time to correct any problems--which may arise . _ 3 7 "We will go up with the City Engineer,, and get the approval so we can get started on the utilities" . �r. Nowak asked if the road had already been started; Mr. Serafini replied that ' they .had cleared out a lot. Mr. Berube inquired if the City Fire department could handle the proposed towers on structures of the development with their equipment ,' and Mr. Serafini stated "Yes , we have made arrangements with the City Fire chief. " Mr. Serafini explained the drawing of the low-cost housing; Abby Burns asked how many dwelling units would be provided. Mr. Serafini - 11250 units , prob- ably a three story structure , :and the land drops ; I think th'ey .want to take advantage of the contour of the land. From the standpoint of how the Board can help, if you are satisfied-.with it as it has been presented to you, and the urgency connected with it, and of the City Engineer ' s recommendations , and if the Board will go along and give their approval as I have outlined, and I ask for two more waivers . - asphalt curbs instead of the ,granite curbs, an extension of a dead end street beyond 500 ' approval, it means that while our time is running, we can begin with the State , and when we get. the utilities in, it will open , up an area that has long been talked about as to what it will do for Salem. . The housing authority. site will, back onto the golf course ; and I think one of the most pleasant sites in the city; , it is' . high and it will.. probably be one of the better projects of this type in the State . Robert Charles" ,Associat:es have done al`great deal of work on this type of housing, and'.havew`on several','awarde2on $the types of architecture they use in putting these projects togethrer'.' Eventually, the area will be completely integrated as you _have housing of different types , and after the ehopping, area is builf,• they will be ableitotget; out to Swampscott Road, nd when these roads are in, you will not have the traffic on Highlands; Avenue . "Our engineers have worked with the City Engineer to minimize problems which sometimes we find on these . I' would. ask that .. the, Board give approval , and let the time begin so that we can get to the State . It may be a quick solu- tion and it may be a lengthy one .- I shall be glad to answer any questions the Board may have or any of the (5) interested spectators . " Questioned by Abby Burns as to the location, of .the City incinerator, Mr. Ser- afini indicated locus of same . George Nowak "You said the road coming in would be more than fifty feet" . Mr. Serafini - , "It will be 63 feet , 50 feet at the opening, 63 feet at the , approach. The roadway isthebest we , could under present circumstances, and if we have to and we should do this after talking with the State , we can use pant of the (adjoining) Saltz land" . George Nowak - "What about this . brook?" Mr. Serafini - "This brook goes down to the golf "course , this is the natural . , course" . George Nowak - "So you are running drainage down here" ? (:Indicating on map) Or. Serafini - "With drainage for the Subdivision, we would have to make some other arrangement" . Gerald McCarthy - "When you extend this ; what are you going to use the rest of the land for?" 4tr. Serafini - "At the present time , there are no plans for further housing. There are other plans to use part of the area as an Industrial Zone , or leave the same way" . Gerald McCarthy - "I am concerned with the ultimate number of apartments in the area with regard to traffic on the proposed road" . Mr. Serafini - "If we propose further `housing; we -would have to come before the .Board again for' approval'+"^ Gerald McCarthy -"How ,likely 'is , it that the_.road will be developed down to Swampscott Road and would that be a .sim P le thin o'r difficult?" _ _g.. . Mr. Serafini -"This road as4you know, - there,is an awful lot of ledge :and some has been removed, the• back part must be the)same" ., ' Abby Burns and George Nowak speak simultaneously "It is" . Mr. Serafini continuing - "Ledge is not the. barrier that it. was , it ' s expen- sive and it is the only way to develop an area , but you have to go through. If you say how likely is it , I 'd say it is likely, but not within the forsee- able future of the next two or three years" . Thomas "Berube - "How about parking? Is it all above ground parking, , or below round?ii Mr. Serafini - "The plan is imaginative ; the people who are doing this , . Campbell , Aldrich and McNulty,. the building will I think, be attractive.. " .Abby Burns "What transportation problems is this going to create" ? Mr. ' Serafini -"I. suppose as far as a bus company is concerned, I- am sure that if there 'is a demand, they will provide service ; my guess is until the shop- ping area is developed, and if they are successful , they maybe able to acquire these buses , and buses will be able .to come in and provide bus service" , ,Abby Burns -"Is there anything when you have low cost housing with regard to providing transportation" . Mr. Zisson member of the Salem Housing Authority) - "It' should' be on a bus line ; we don' t find this to be a problem, even low income people- have cars" . Gerald McCarthy -"How many units in the Pequot Towers" ? Mr. Serafini _-11250 units ; and in Salem Housing it is 100; 25% of the 250 units will be available . for, low cost housing" . Chairman McCarthy _ "Does anybody have any more questions ?" No answer. Chairman McCarthy - "Is there"anyone who would like to speak against?" spectator who identified himself as Mr. Spinelli , an abutter, was present with his wife and two children; he has horses and other . animals , and has, no objection to the development of the road, but is concerned for intrustion on his privacy and interference with his method of disposing of natural by- products . - 5 - 'Mr. Zisson spoke .-"I am not here in behalf of the Authority, but I would like to be recorded in favor of this Subdivision . •hairman McCarthy -,"If there are, no otherlspeakers who wish to be heard, or if there are no members, of :the ' Board,,wlio, wishi toa,ask further questions , we can, consider this meeting closed"'. Michael Freeman moved, seconded byiGeorge, Noiaak, gthat the hearing be closed, and with all in favor, it was so moved. ,Chairman McCarthy "In+ conjunct on with the hearing, and part of our meeting, we have a letter from the City Engineer and proceeded. to .read the lettere :. . This letter dated September 2 , 1971, Re-Subdivision Definitive Plan of High- land Realty. Trust , Highland• Avenue , 'was the official reply of the City Engin- eer to a letter from this. Board requesting his advice and counsel after a . study of said plan" . A letter from John R. Serafini, Counsel for the developer, was read to the meeting requesting two waivers : - #1 - the requirement as to the 500-foot limitation relative to turnarounds . #2 - to permit the use of asphalt curbings in place of 'granite . Mr. Serafini went on to say he had talked with Dr. Toomey of the Health De partment who assured him that a letter from the- Board of Health would be forthcoming to the Board with regard to this proposed subdivision, . stating , their approval in complete agreement with the recommendations of the City �ngineer. Chairman McCarthy asked if anybody had any comments they wished to make . Thomas Berube and George Nowak asked if the state would ask for a wider open- ing of the entrance road off Highland Avenue . Jane Lundregan moved that the .plan be approved, _predicated on the approval . of the Health Department ; seconded by Abby Burns; Chairman' McCarthy reminded the Members that the legend as recommended by the City Engineer, shall -have . to be included on the linen, and with all in favor, . the plan was voted approved With an additional reminder that the .Board must notify the City Clerk of this action, the public Hearing was closed at 8: 35 P.M. Counselor George Vallis picked up where he left off when he retired in favor of the attorney for the developer: He read several letters , his letter of September 1970 requesting release of . sec.urity; a letter from this 'Board, dated October 22 , 1970 in reply to his .request ,_ based on recommendations by the City Engineer. Mr. Vallis pointed out that the hot top plants had. closed down in the middle of November, and recommendations for hot toping roads had to .be carried out in the Spring of 1971 letter .dated ,August '19 ,. 1971; received from the City Engineer with regard to an inspection of the - areas in Witchcraft Heights which revealed that the noted defects had been satisfactorily repaired,. { - 6 - A second letter received from Mr. Tedford, dated September 2, 1971 , .was read' to the meeting. This letter states that "This is to inform you that .Salem Acres , Inc .' has submitted "as built" ..plans of the following portion of Witchcraft Heights Valley Street Outlook. Hill Gallows -Hill Road Puritan Road Cauldron Court Gables Circle Crescent Drive c, Gallows Circle Witchcraft RoadWitch Way Pioneer Circle Summit Street Circle Hill Road from Gallows Hill Road to Rockdale Avenue . "The plans have been found to be essentially correct with the exception of that portion of the area that was originally designated 'as Lot 75, and now includes Gallows Circle and a portion of Puritan Road, where stone bounds have not been set . For the most part , the utilities have operated to date with a minimum of maintenance" .. Mr.. Vallis explained that the .discussion had had to do with the condition of the sidewalks and roads , and the function of the utilities , adding . "I think you have now evidence from the City Engineer. to the effect that these have been functioning for the last six years" . Mr. Berube stated if the City Engineer ,were satisfied, he was satisfied. �n motion of Jane Lundregan, seconded by Mr. Freeman, and opposed by Mr.Nowak, he Board voted to release security in the amount of $42 ,000 .00 to Salem Acres , Inc . , developers of the Witchcraft Heights area , retaining security on other portions of the development amounting to $18 , 200 .00 . Counselor Vallis requested and was granted permission by the Board to ad- vertise notice of a public. hear,ing to be held at the first October meeting of this Board. In the meantime , the clerk is to request in behalf of the Board, that the City Council grant permission to use the Council Chamber for said hearing. On motion of Thomas Berube , duly seconded, the Board voted unanimously to include in the approval of the aforementioned definitive plan -on .which the Public Hearingwasheld tonight the following "Subject to a Covenant or a Bond in an' amount" set :by the City Engineer" approved by the City Solicitor as to form. On motion of Mr,. Freeman, the members voted to adjourn at. 9: 25 P.M. Respectfully submltted" :_a CITYPLANNIING BOARD,. Clerk � �,cmwtG4 THOMAS BERUBE �iT l�. RU of p�fllCm, � u$sttc �zse##8 ABBY BURNS t� ry MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY � i IiIYtYCTXt(( L.'F70�[r� JANE LUNDREGAN v • Ta.i - cl�ms»�y OPM 7 -- Ctu , roll GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 9 . 2 . 71 7: 00 P.M. FORM A - Salem Redevelopment Authority, New Derby Street . FORM A - Robert E. Warner, 8 Hawthorne Boulevard. FORM A - Gordon Alley,WalterPecevich, Winter Island Road. FORM A - DeIulis Bros . Construction, Turnaround Seemore Street . 7: 30 P.M. REGULAR BOARD MEETING: 1 . Minutes of last meeting. 2 . Letter from office of Pearl , McNiff & Crean. 3 . Zoning map with corrections received'from Carter & Towers today. • 4 . Council Order regarding "Urban Systems Network" . 5 . Letter from Mr. Tedford Re-Effects of I-95 connectors copies sent ) 6 . Letter from Gov. Sargent ' s office - "Meeting Schedules and agenda" )copies sent ) 7 . Copy of letter and questionnaire from Dept . of Community Affairs (questionnaire already filled and returned as indicated) 8. Decisions from Board of Appeals on recently heard appeals . 9 . Miscellaneous correspondence received. 8 :00 P .M. PUBLIC HEARING - Plan of land "HIGHLAND ACRES" , located off Highland Avenue , Highland Realty Trust , owners , represented by John R. Serafini . • 01i#g of �$akm, fflasear uBri#s Citv Anll Salem, ,9ll[assuchuseHs 81978 FORM A v APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT o �q OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE l" ern APPROVAL > N �nQ vSe < . In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the W x applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a nr Cj 4 Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- 4 F" mission for such determination. The notice shall be 6t attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -__5eptember-2--------------19-71-- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ---')he__ro-ate---alre-ady-Ims__bee32_sa2p2'_+2'R_fll__a&__PT-t_-D�_________ ._Slab- tri si on.---The__lota_ho m-_Wnf0r a--ta zona nz, _:1 aw -- ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ---Ae--- 2lis---Brothers__-Co=#r;=_tio t Gompany.,__1we --------- Address --_2$---Colli2.1_k__ --------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ---------------------------------- Address------------4_7_ _ -8aleM*__Ka0a=1 e_tt;--------- 3. Deed of property records in ------SQUt11__ SSeX___________________________________Registry Book -------112-------------------------- Page --------65------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: __LOt_26_SLe[ or—e__Str-eet___G411'l'aiminY-_____-_ ----- -}49'x__ 5__Q;"_mixtu __sglaar __ eet_And__Ut�__Seemore__Strest------- ------eontain ng--_7__%Q0j--?ohm r-m ix amore feet._________________ -------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be- shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. , Signature of Owner-----' `a----�-- -="-"_'----President_ Address _8_Collins Street,...LF_nn:-rjsssachusetts Telephone Number -- -595-X677---- ------------------------------------ r gP�oro✓o/ ur�der fhe Su�visior� Confro/ Low i7of re�/ii�'u.�o'�r ' Chow. -Z Sec. 8/P • ✓ohrr /Y�oriO �Or5g J SALEM PLANK/N� BoARD ��IU�/S DELL00 sT - 9°dn cd Lar./,4 Lor 4 �3m `' ... ✓oh�,��iYla,io / Ji e> � Oelu/is OLor a Lo 5" A= �' , o04sF J W 13835 05 z-or 714 t'oT PLAN of LAND in SAL EM LoT ,20 Property o/ L'onsbwelio" Co., /rye. LaT ,Z/ 40 buy W,, /97/ .. i ESSFX SU,P✓EY SE�PIi/CE /NC. '7" U-0 n�'C.i'b-« c-� - ; _ 47 Federal Street .So%rrr 2333 �t# 4Iem, ElssttcC�ltse## of ,r��c �Irlmting �uxx� 0tq pall Aalem, ,AHassacllasetts 01970 =~ w O yt: by > M M4 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO LU C-) cv =:i FORM "A"APPLICATIONS W WW c.� �Q See Form "A" applications for sN y complete instructions for filing. `z v All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: --_August 9i 1971____ City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at __8__H&thome_Boulevar&_-------_----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- in Ward --------------------------------------------------------- (insert ,street and street numbers here) Robert E. Warner, y Signature of Owner -------- ----- --------- `�/ ------------ R. Serafini, Esquire / Street Addressaf0_-} &UVa-ah1n9ten--Street----------v=--------- - - --------- City/'Town&State_Seem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone Number ------------------------------744-0212------------------------------------------------ • 1 ., 0-111i#g of $ateut, Aassachuse##s Planning Puurb alug pall �alettc,,9Ufassecliusetts D197a FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL vIn accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the • applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a CD o w Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- LL3 0% n Z mission for such determination. The notice shall be y attached to two copies of this Form A application. v 'jwj The notice and both copies of the application must Ca H be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one `"j rY, copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the -v Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass-- ---------------—Auguist-$7--------197-1---- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A qnd state specific reasons) t$fhprVoeert�y i�nvaquAU wont its_ivt ha8 been-hreidst@n -for-i aany many years-+r4or_to_the-adoption_of_the_Subdivision_Control--Law-And_which_lat_contains the two dvfellingssn_guestion.---The_dw-ellings__have_b-een_in__exisLsnce.-for-ptQbAbly__Qver 50 years. No structural changes have been made nor are any contemplated and the purpose of the endorse- mentdg4lef��Wi 4dts-d jiWir ��� that Plannin Board a royal under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ----Rohert-F...-SN--anler-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address __-_c%9__l<26—Wnshington_Street_i_Salem,-_Mass.----- --------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -----Essex--Survey-+Servicel-Ino,---------------------------------------- Address------47--Federal-Street,-Salem,-Mass,------------------------------------------ 3. Deed of property records in __Es x_youW-I3tstriVt____—____________- Registry Book ------------------------------------- Page ------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -----8---Flathorne--BouLe-vard-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the PI t ether with thenames of the Owners of the abutting lots. Robert E. Warner, by: Signature of Owner o - -- -— ----------- -7T�ri- - a- firii,--Ssqui� Address ----0/0--i2-6-W inguen--S eet------------------------------------ Telephone Number __Salemf_.MaBs.___244-D21�______________________ i FARLEY, SERAFINI & FARLEY • ATTORNEYS AT LAW 126 WASHINGTON STREET JAMES E. FARLEY SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R.SERA.FINI RICHARD P. FARLEY TELEPHONE 744-0212 August 9, 1971 City of Salem Planning Board City Hall Salem, Massachusetts 01970 re: Robert E. Warner Property at: Hathorne Boulevard • Gentlemen: Enclosed please find Form "A" together with linen plan, which I submit to you for endorsement on behalf of my client, Robert E. Warner. A variance has been granted by the Board of Appeals in connection with this division of Lots A and B and endorsement can be made on the plan. This endorsement is for the purpose of recording. Very truly yours, I SERAFINI, Esquire QRS/lakEnc. (0;IJIN7R • ,<< Ttiti fl of �. Pourb of '�Yyeaf WRLLIAM F. ABBOTT DECISION ON PETITION OF ROBERT E. WARNER FOR VARIANCE.. ' JAMES N. BOULDER FROM APPLICABLE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS OF CITY ZONING JOSEPH R. OOYLE ORDINANCE AFFECTING EXISTING DWELLINGS AT 8-10-10 '— JOHN M. GRAY, SR. 2 ARTHUR LAORCCOUC HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD. EMERY P. TANCH J. NORMAN WELCH, JR. - Petitioner through Counselor John R. Serafini , appealed to the Board of Appeals for a variance from the applicabledensity requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance affecting existing structures at 8-10-102 Hawthorne Boulevard which had been purchased as one parcel . ' A hearing was held on this appeal on July 26 , 1971 , pursuant to notices mailed postpaid to the Petitioner, his attorney, Board members , abutters , and others , and advertisements published in the Salem Evening News , advis ing of this hearing. Counselor Serafini appeared for the Petitioner, and stated the case; his client had purchased this property as one parcel , and wishes to transfer houses individually 11 a y as shown on plan submitted, both buildings have existed . on this lot of land for well over fifty years ; due to a new Zoning Ordinance ' n adopted � 1965 , variances are required from the applicable density require- ments of said Ordinance affecting lot area , lot width, and front and side yard setbacks . Board Members present at this hearing were Mr. Abbott , Mr. Boulger, Mr. Doyle , Mr. Gray, and Mr. Labrecque , and Associate Members Mr. Tanch and Mr. Welch. No one appeared in opposition. The Board, on the basis of evidence , found that there had been no altera- tions , additions , or extensions since the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance , and that the area remained substantially the same as prior to the adoption , of the Ordinance in 1965, and further found as a fact that the proposed division of the lot and the transfer of the separate parcels would still . leave each lot with an area large enough to be compatible with the use of the buildings for dwelling houses . The Board therefore unanimously voted to grant the variance requested pro- vided that Petitioner applies to the City Planning Board for endorsement of his plan as not requiring approval under. the Subdivision Control Law; . ' so as to permit transfer of these properties as separate parcels : . III APPEAL GIZTTL761) . CITY ' OF SALEM - — BOARD OF APPALS, U BY • c: M Secretary � F" , (Ei#g of '�ttlem, Htt�s c ztse##s � Uj - G_ "' t— , a FORM A sn �[ .i a APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT w -�� OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL, File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy .¢ with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. J' Salem, Mass., ----August--27 ------------------------19 7i To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect.h- pga on a public way. II-A) -__-_.-_---_ Te parcel shown on said plan has frontage- - ------------------ --- ------- -- - -------- ----- - ----------------------------- ----- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant _--Salem Redevelopment_ Authority - - Address 60 Washington Street 2• Name of Engineer or Surveyor-- Whitman & Howard, Inc. - -- -- -- - Address 89 Broad Street, Boston, Massachusetts 3. Deed of property records in __Essex South District -_ _ Registry Book-------566_8...........Page-----220 4. Location and Description of Property: _Fire station lots to be conveyed to the ___ ----------------------------------__--_ ______------------------------------------------------- City of Salem on Lafayette Street. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------------------------—----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- --- -------- ------ ---- ------------------------- SAL DEV LO T AUTHORITY By r // Signature of Owner it--- f or --- ------A�1/`----------------- y Address __60 Washington Str -et, Salem, Mass. I i / 7 „ /�.x y =tf I 2 J ' , alitV pall s*k. - •-•-, W o4alaa,Alaseaelptsetts 01876 ti U G � . . ., LD Q nN y Q 14 - -w. LM - Lt: (Y) S ,.A La U.1 I_ NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO ry rN v t: FORM"A"APPLICATIONS Q 'U _ See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: A49.2st 27, 1971 City Clerk • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at Lafayette Street - - -- - in War/ d -- j/ -------------- ---------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) SALEM DE EL O ; AUTHORITY Y Signature of Owner B !l�- ---- _ <'- ------------------------ its At_____ ey Street Address ---------60-_Washington_IStreet ------ City/Town&State...Salem,...Massachusetts-__ ____ Telephone Number _74476900 l . I O TRUST N I CITY o/0-A m WITCH Z ( parcel 10 ) N m r . _. ..�. g parcel 2l 35'- =M .' MOSES ALPERS ( N 06°-14-03„ N 133. (parcel l0-A � „ W a_ 45 - 15 W mo _n N 070-19 -38 N,,. 28.55 z 08 0 42.58 0 w 01 .. . _ (Dm O I Z o W Lrn I A c C I 823 SQ. FT. >- AREA = 18 . l / � 12 , 13 , 14 , 15J m o <n 1 I parcels l0-A, I I ' Block I 15 Lu 4 o + I • o_ c ( I /4 R.=9.00;, Q I /3 I I L.=10.32 \9D — -- 3 /2 q Lt/ W ti r` M Z03.80 , E Q s o7' ° t `gT RE a9, y7 -- LAFAYETTE PROPERTY PLAN - Project No. Mass. R-95 _. HERITAGE PLAZA - EAST T SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SALEM, MASS. SCALE I"= 20' APRIL 30, 1971 - • --C rz" WHITMAN 9 HOWARD, , INC. ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS •- - 89 BROAD ST. BOSTON, MASS. 71-092 f w Ctg of Planning 'Pana (Eau Pau p - Salem, ,�[sssacilusef#s Q397D t Lu r�c FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE .`. . ;1.9 APPROVAL ea >--am In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the as applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be * attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. u ust 30 71 Salem, Mass., --------AgRuSt--- the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) _ The-_plan__doesnot alter frontage—and_does__not-_reduce area below_ zoning_ requirements__(see attached sketch of Assessor's _ARA show3ng_afPected_parcels) ----------------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of( a Gordon_B:__Alley__et__ux-, 5 Winter Island Road ------------------------------------------------ �3d Wa_1_ter_Pecev_ich__e_t__ux_,___9_WlnterI9land Road - ----- ---- ----- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Charles Axelrod Address- 57 Corning St -Beverly- - ----------------------------- 3. ------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ----B6S6*---South------------------------------------- Registry Book 4407---------------------------- Page __55 -_ ----------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _____________________________________--_ _ -___Mr.__and__-mra_._ Alley___and_94r _and_Mra __Pecev_ich_each own approxi . _____mately- one_half _of_a salt-water swimming pool straddling_ their — common property line- _ 'the Pecevichs _have__agreed to sell to ------------- -------- -- ----_ tt�e_Alley-s____their interest_ in_ the pool and_ the plan_ in question' describes the area to_be conveyed -------- --------------------------------------------------------� ----- � • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown one Plan to the e o the wners Ardiff Ardiff 8a orseDanvers cekich Mass of the abuttinglots. B Signature of Owner--y- L Address -c-/o----- ------------------------f f --- or ---' - a --e s, - . Telephone Number -7707121 ! .r d Rt } �- t 'Vpi4 Dd 7r> �., c' r ^r 0S tjk r la Y 7 II I '4f a tt t. r L � + ass ev t: 7 Jy � � a•j{ e:\�fp• J ,`- >�{:. e 0 ' (► �' 722 Ic jz tj wy r a k 1 t oI u i . � }l -.� � � { /� -�s v � � 5 !` � t ' .tic' 3 �^��yd�k \;sksR }" .�,,, L ♦�� "" y"d�y7�'€.nA1 '{�^` S�itr Sx.,,4 37� •:_ t i` dY ! +ut, .o <7 < a a .I , ri' C, r J11 e S ,�s y f f •� S � r i : � `� a +' ,�• , ^k.� m. 0 S f �r� � i C "I •III I'k +s, t YY.rt � eau 7 � ,F � ` Z �� �i I �� y ! } , a Yk t< u,S✓i u�r a;w r a ry, e 'k.*'l ,fta ..- F *r J { � yk M1 4 x '. a vknx I < e a MCC < 6 fa f r A - 1 ♦4 '"t S � i IB d ee 5 < � a s�' A ar 5 a v G ti G��': S (N� C New ldde k�. • 4' (UafJ� r e , Pecevi e x v • o � OtK h 3 6-a r r6 i t r 1 r' r t CIV y� �y}r' N ny}� ttQ yy �t p1TT` CIV o $ale , &*Hassarhuse445 ABBY BURNS UBE „+ MICHAEL FREEMAN m JAMES GARRITY s .� ItIYTYTTYt� IIIc'TT�I JANE LUNDREGAN v �6.INF RTHY Pam 7 -- Titg dull GERALD A GEO RGE NO NOWAK 9 . 21 . 71 TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 9 . 16 . 71 Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened this meeting promptly at 7: 30 P.M. with the following members present : Thomas Berube, Abby Burns, Michael Freeman, James Garrity, Jane Lundregan, George Nowak, and Tadios Sadoski . Copies of the minutes of the last meeting were distributed to the members , and after a careful study, on motion of George Nowak, seconded by Jane Lun- dregan, and with all members in favor, it was voted to approve and accept same . A plan of land submitted on vellum was presented in behalf of Robert Cum- mings , Trustee,, showing land and building at the corner of Warren and Flint Streets . The Board was of the opinion that if the proper Form A application were presented with this plan it could be endorsed as not re- quiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. Mr. Nowak stated he would advise Mr. Cummings to this effect . A letter to the City Council , requesting their permission to use the Council Chamber for a proposed Public Hearing to be held on October 21st , was read •to this meeting. This will be brought to the regular Council meeting on September 23rd, and if permission is given "ads" may be prepared and pub- lished in time to allow for the Public Hearing as proposed. Board Members indicated interest in visiting the sites of the proposed developments by DiBiase Bros . off Loring and Jefferson Avenues , and another off Marlborough Road, in connection with this Public hearing, and Chairman Gerald McCarthy will make arrangements with Counselor George Vallis who represents the developers . The agenda and notices of petitions of the forthcoming Board of Appeals hearings , scheduled for September 20th, were brought to this meeting; also from the Board of Appeals , decisions on petitions heard at the last meeting of that Board were received and placed on file . Correspondence of a miscellaneous nature received by the Board was also placed. on file . All business brought to this meeting having been attended to, members voted unanimously to adjourn at 8: 45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, CITY AANNING BOARD, Clerk i i �T �y tt ({��* y�1T`l THOMAS BERUBE �1TJ IIftt1Em, �,' FIBSFIL1xSPfB ABBY BURNS 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN a Planning QcTr?1 JAMES GARRITY • va °. _y:;f eq JANE LUNDREG AN ` cLMvs. yuom 7 -- (Qit�r 3ria11 GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 9 . 16 . 71 1 . Distribute copies of the last meeting minutes . this 2 . Linen of Robert Cummings ; he discussed with George Nowak. 3 . Letter from Planning Board to City Council , requesting use of Council Chamber for Public Hearing on October 21, 1971 . 4. Agenda of hearing of Board of Appeals to be held 9 . 20 . 71 and notices of each appeal . -5. Decision on petition of Swampscott Motor Services , Inc . , heard. at Board of Appeals hearing 8 . 23 - 9 - 13 - 6 . Notices from Essex Agricultural and Technical Institute , re - Seminars, etc . , Fall - 1971 - 7 . Miscellaneous literature received since last meeting. THOMAS BERUBE �4 Tttg of Satcm, ".YIassar1 usetts ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN a JAMES GARRITY j g �MYTYiIIi� IIGIX� JANE LUNDREGAN r3 C'�RDtt[ 7 -- T[tV �iulf GERALD McCART HY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 10 . 7 . 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY Board members present at this meeting included Chairman Gerald McCarthy, James Garrity, Thomas Berube , Michael Freeman, Abby Burns , Geroge Nowak, and Raymond Sweeney. Five Form A applications were submitted for endorsements of accompanying plans: Kathryn and Helen Coyne , Lots A, 100, and 101 Nichols Street - the purpose of this plan being to convey Lot 100; Lots A and 101 are to be combined as a single lot , and are not to be built upon or sold separately, as stated on application; on motion of James Garrity, seconded by Michael Freeman, the Board voted unanimously to endorse this plan. The second Form A application and plan were submitted by Robert Cummings , Trustee , and showed a 'lot of land at 14 Flint Street , corner of Warren Street , with structure existing since 1821 ; the purpose of this plan is for recording; Michael Freeman moved that this plan be endorsed, second- ed by George Nowak, and with all in favor, plan was approved. • Two form A applications were submitted with a linen showing land, present- ly owned by the City of Salem and in the process of being conveyed to the two applicants , Frank Soshowski and John B. Snow; Lot B on plan will be- come annexed to land at 9 Conners Road, and Lot A, shall become part of land at 54 Osgood Street ; it was moved that this plan also be endorsed as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law, and with all Members in favor, voted approved. The purpose of endorsing the fourth plan,presented by B.P . Service Station, owner J. R. Sousa and Sons , Inc . , was to record the lot of land on Cala- brese Street , corner of Jackson Street ; on motion of Raymond Sweeney, sec- onded by Thomas Berube , with all in favor, it was voted to endorse this plan. Salem Acres , Inc . , owner, through Counselor George Vallis , presented a Form A application and plan of seven lots on Sable Road and Buena Vista Avenue within a Subdivision already approved by this Board; on motion of James Garrity, seconded by Raymond Sweeney, members voted to endorse this plan provided the following additional language be included: "Building Permits not to be issued on Lots 48A, 48B, and 48C without further approval of the Salem Planning Board" . On motion of George Nowak, seconded by Abby Burns , the Board approved and accepted minutes of the last meeting. - 2 Attorne YJohn McNiff appeared with his client , Mr . John Jerm n, with regardand to his letter to this • Board,. dated August 26, 1971 , relating to grievances of his client caused by development of a subdivision by Salem Acres , Inc . •At that time Mr.- McNiff and Mr- Vallis , counsel for the developers , agreed to discuss the matter between themselves to see if a. satisfactory solutionl could. be achieved . Mr. McNiff wished to inform the- Board that his client was concerned by the developers ' placing fill in certain areas of a .proposed street , bordering his property; he produced several snapshots of the areas involved, some prior to the development and others after the development had progressed to the site ; he stated that there ;.had been some discussion of the possibility of the developers purchasing his client ' s land; he further stated that in fact , he had a written agreement in his possession whereby the devel- opers gave assurance that .the fill in question would be removed. Mr. Vallis , speaking for the developers , pointed out that his client',s aware of the necessity for an additional approach. and egress to and from the entire development of Witchcraft Heights , commenced preliminary filling of specific areas of a paper street', in order that the grade of existing connecting streets would .be equaled; he assured the Members that his clients would re- move this fill . Mr. Sweeney moved that both attorneys present themselves to the Board at the second meeting in December, in order that a determination may ,be made ' whether the matter has reached a satisfactory conclusion; this motion was seconded by Mr. Nowak, and .with all members in favor, voted approved . A letter received from .the City Engineer, Mr. Ralph W. Tedford, relating to the- new zoning map prepared by Carter . &Towers , was read to this meeting. " r. Tedford'-found the intent of the plan conforms in general to the zone descriptions advertised, and recommended that the transcription of the zone line descriptions onto. the 1"=100 ' ' As'sessors ' plans be started as soon . as possible : Mr. Garrity moved that the members sign the zoning map in accordance with the recommendation of the City Engineer, seconded by Mr. Sweeney, and with all- in favor, the map ,was voted accepted and signed by the Members . Mr. McCarthy will inquire into comparable costs of reducing and reproducing the maps for resale to interested parties seeking to obtain same . The required statutory period following acceptance of a definitive plan by the Planning Board having expired, - the Board voted to sign the linens of the Highland Realty Trust , .'develope'rs of a proposed road off Highland Avenue , . incorporating the recommendations of the City ' Engineer, . as follows: 1 . Slope easements as* required by the City Engineer for road maintenance . 2 . No building -permit is to be issued 'until` approval` 'fr•om the Department of Public Works has been obtained forHighlandAvenue connection of ,road. A letter received from Carter N Towers Engineering Corp . , dated September . 30, 1971 " with regard to Vista Avenue , fWitchcraft Heights ,., Salem, was read to the meeting; the letter stated'i,th' original linen plan had' been submit - to to the City Engineer with a cover'= 'letter %ask ng for°his approval or odifications . The Board voted to table this matter until the next meeting, opefully looking forward to receiving a report from Mr. Tedford. From the office of Mayor -Samuel E. Zoll , ,notification was received .of the . "Emergency Employment Act of 1971 ' with reference to a Professional Plan- ning Director being employed to , assist City officials in taking advantage 3 of existing Federal and State programs that would benefit the City. Copies of recent 'decisions on petitions presented to the Board of Appeals ere received and placed on file . Mr. McCarthy returned a copy of the Camp , Dresser, McKee report on the South River Flood control project which" he had been studying. The next member to study this report. will be Abby Burns . Miscellaneous correspondence ,received was reviewed and properly attended to . This was the final business of the meeting, and it was voted to adjourn at 9 : 25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, BY Clerk • ,.. ��IV4 qy F .., r `4� yet F• !li T ;A ntt �* n1T THOMASBERUBE Q 01itu of �MIEm, C77I Mssarhusetts ABBY BURNS 111 r ( MICHAEL FREEMAN �j Planning '•`>Ivarb JAMES GARRITY 'H C JANE LUNDREGAN �Raum 7 -- CtU �iHII GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA - CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - FORM "A" APPLICATIONS FOR ENDORSEMENT; Kathryn and Helen Coyne , Lots A, 100, 101 Nichols Street . Robert F. Cummings , Trs . 14 Flint Street , corner of Warren John B. Snow, Lot A Collins Cove ) adjoining parcels, Frank Sosnowski , Lot B Collins Cove) one linen-; B P Service Station, Calabrese and Jackson Streets Salem Acres , Inc . , 7 Lots on Sable Road & Buena Vista Ave . 1 . Minutes of meeting 9 . 16 . 71 . • 2 . Have Clerk of the Board sign minutes of 9 . 2 . 71 meeting. 3 . Letter from Atty . John McNiff, Re-Jermyn, Marlborough Road. 4 . Letter from City Engineer Re-Zoning map and relation to Assessors ' Plans . New maps prepared by Carter & Towers ready for review. 5• Linens of Highland Realty Trust for signatures of Members ; plan already approved - statutory period required has terminated. 6 . Letter from Carter & Towers Re-Vista Ave. , Witchcraft Heights . 7 . Emergency Employment Act of 1971 - "Planning Director" . 8 . Copies of recent decisions on Board of Appeal petitions . 9 . Camp, Dresser & McKee report returned by Chairman Gerald McCarthy, to be passed on to next Board Member. 10 . Miscellaneous correspondence received since last meeting. • aECEu109 ofIexrt, ttsszrc �tse##s • �� ' OCT 1 s pN'tl latlrclrl� uar 61TY C4iWS UFFICI cite pall SALEM.MASS. dal , �tassadrissetts uteza FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall he typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass. -------------------------------------------_19-------- To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. I1-A and state specific reasons) ______It_is_an existing_ lot with a building which ha-s--taeera--atanding__ziat a e---1821.-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- - --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ------Rabart_F__Cummings,_—Tmstee------------'------------------------------- Address--------$0__W8L_6_hAagtoll__StS'ee_t----Sa Lem-AR'.&S------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -----Edwin---T.Arudzynski------------------- - Address4GG_ Lafayett®__3treetSalem - -- --------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in -----------&A_,Jtx�-----Gouat�t -----------------------Registry Book ----- 5002 ---- Page -----127---------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------14- Filr►t__Street__-_uox_nez°__ol-4arr- -St-------------------------------------- --------------------JAind--and--building-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on th an together with the n es of the Owners of the abutting lots. _-(�(� Signature of Owner--- - -- --- - Address------b0__washi ton-..St----Salmi- - Telephone Number ------ 7'_"_5__36g6---_--____ jkECVYTD c�T siEa;"N �s��ct 41HU Pa„ Salem, �[assack�assefis 91979 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached.to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall he typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ....October---5=----------------1971--- To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons)/the undersigned are the owners of Lots 100 10-- and Lot A �� 88��owri o1i 1a -"Fief ewit ---hav`ng"""a" -tom -I- o' t8�cgte of 186 43 feet. Iota--10II_-and-__101e_ ae�s n rejUterea land_ _Ln 18__a--pparcel of unreist re 11and. The undereineopoee oean Lot �anoreL txl ]l�rth the . area nt oa+e lirtc ,tires x-as on s e E .n assts Y";_ reserving--- n--easement...only---€or-driveway-and=-pari ---pmrposes- dor one -Car in a small portion__there-Q -Alimnon_the__ lan,___Ths_ .0 arsal___t _ba__r_onveyed,_Iot 100 -- contains 7008 square feet with frontage of 87.00 feet, and the retained combined Parcels,---Lotis "10? ari8 ----hsve---a---total--aYea--of--805-5- $4,Wt_d--feet with--a--combined j. frontage--of--94:-43---feet ----Lots--101--- nd--k-are--to--ire--,cwr fined--as--one--airng3e lot and not -to--be--huA1t---upon car aeltl separate3p=--------------- -------------------------------------- 2. Name of En 'neer or Surveyor _ __________________________________ � y Essex--survey-u ervxce�-x1c Address ---------------------47--Federal--8t. Salem-------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ____________gSS X__ ------------------------------ Registry Cert. of Title No. 32-foo -aflstered� p c v Looforloll_and 1011 - BK4. Location and Description of Property: --------2a-N-iohGla---S-treet7---Salemt---------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on th an together withlbe names of he Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner - - = --u s� r ------ Address-----28--Nich_ols_- ,_--Address----2s--Nichols- T lemr-X&ss. ------ Telephone Number ------------------------ ---------------- za�wol , 'E/¢F/.ntSt. Som Moss' LL .fro/C/in -Zof� �/9lP r �t r 1 73 s warren o. %����ivr�o%na�i-�i��✓�sicv� C�nfrv/Lao nay` tiii�' r 0 G� v D �ide 5g: . •d, m, �,. o �� 5 J 00 qPM c �ov N. � 5 s 2f ( 0 10O" - 0 O i� i` 50�3�' 00 e, 6 •�?�iova/�/r�'or 7�ic 9uLr�irisio.� '�Fd� �bl �� �'oafro/.CDwnof�pUrrr+�u�wcr z.v s-er BiP � sotE.v/ RANN/N!r' ��vea Being a rrsubd✓iaibo of Lots 4G 4J f 9B shour�an — g5G 1,-/ad w.dh Ccit of Tf/e /20. /ccrfify t/�t thcs at�fua�surny syus �'e on Me 9ruvnd ire aura e,?1&e #P-Ilh fhe load . Louif/resfruvfor�s of/9J/ bclire-<r� Auras,' D�lE. /G,/97/ Ocfo6pr 4, /9 / OF NOTE ROBERT yN� PL A/ Y of LAND LOT/a/ fO Ge BOWMAN No. 18881 /of�shereir� hercvq qs .Cof.4J 7�0 loin ox O SALEM Lbr��% UDUs �f 1sT8R�04 SURF' ,0ml ca/e: /��= -50 , Oct 4, /97/ ESSEX SU.PYEY SE'P✓/CE ' /NC. 47 federal Strep, So%rn SG2B Ctv of tt�ztc, 41ttssadjuse#ts aid Pau Calera, ,�Hessacl�usef#s D197D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL j, . '•v' In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the U. . . applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a C3 0. off Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- n4, mission for such determination. The notice shall be LUattached to two copies of this Form A application. WWL. The notice and both copies of the application must e� vy be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the y Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., _______October5---------------1971--- To the Planning Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and statespecific reasons _ The property has the required frontage and areto comply with the coning ordinances on an accepted way. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner J.R. Sousa_ and Sons,_ Inc. __-__- _---- Address __ 29 Andover Street Danversi__Mass 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -------Carter and Towers--Engineering-_Corp.------- Address__ _____ 5_Fairv_iew Avenue, Swampscott, Mass._____ 3. Deed of property records in -----------------------------------------------------------------Registry Book ------------------------------- Page ------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _______________Northerly_ 200 f eet__by- Jackson --------- _other eetby__other_land_of J.R. SousaandSons Sou therly__177 20_feet_by_ other_ land J.R. Sousa__and_ ons_-Inc. Westerly 127.27 feet_ by_Calabrese_ Street containing ---- S 23.832 s.f. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner---- a ^9 T ' Q�a Lt . -- 4-- --- -- Address-----------------%-V -WoSw �----------------------------------------- Telephone Number ----------- -------------------------------- PLANNING BOARD APPROVAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE SALEM MASS. SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. J.R. SOUSA IN SONS INCi SALEM PLANNING BOARD: „ SCALE I =40 9/21/71 CARTER & TOWERS ENG'R CORP. SWAMPSCOTT , MASS. p�k 4 DATE : oz�t JOSEPH��� ' DAVID -' i i J.R. SOUSA d SONS INC. 3 I N- oG p SERVICE STATION N, N 232832 S.F. TA �A 124.4 4 OWNER UNKNOWN X225 �9 JACKSON ( 65' w ide public) STREET F- 8390 • • • u�A-, ._/ ,ac,�sa�v , cS.. �ALF��/J �1AsS. of *alent, fflttssa 1jusetts 345TH $11 zting ux> D CITY CLERK'S 0016E citv pall SALEM.MASS. � ,, �tas$a�l �tts II197II FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. October 7Iy 71 Salem, Mass.> ------------------------------ _____________ To the Planning Board: The,undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) the lots presently__fronton_ a road (Sable Road____ PrAviously approved in accordance with Subdivision Control Law. ----------------------- --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner __5alem Acres,___Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address- 71 Hancock Street,_ Everett, Mass. 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _Carter eer�YtSq_3C�srpA------------------- Address_ 6 Fairview Avenues Sw-ampscott,-_Mass. - --------- ---- ------- ------------- 3. Deed of property records in _ __E_sseX South Districtr - Registry — — Book _5393 ____ Page 594 and Book 54788 Page 571 4. Location and Description of Property: _ 7_19ts located on SAble Road and ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Buena Vista Avenue. - ---------------- --- - - - --- ------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------—--------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----1----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----- ------ - ----------------------_- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the PI together i e les o the Owners of the abuttinglots. SALEM A So N / l%< Signature of Owner—BY ----------11o- ngs a--------Address 70 Washa--e--m---,- Mass. J-a ---s--s---.- ------------ 744-2172 Telephone Number ------------------ - - - - - ---------------- 6�1 45 Z� Planning �Inttrb C111 CLtKK ASS.{C� Sl IEM� 0tg Anil Aalem, ,ffitassacljusetts 01978 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: ____9ctober 7,_1971_ City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Su: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at __-Sable Road and Buena Vista - --- -- -- --- -- -- Wenue - ------------------- in Ward (insert street and street numbers here) SALEM RES, I Signature of Owner --------$yam ., g 1-s,---------------------- Street Address _______________70W_ _shin g•on Street - - - ------------------------------ City/Town&State Salem, Massachusetts - - - ------------------------------------------ Telephone Number _____________________749_-2172________________ • SUBDIVISION OF LAND SALEM, MASS. SALEM ACRES INC. SCALE 1 "=40I SEPT. 29, 1971 CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. 6 FAIRVIEW AVE. SWAMPSCOTT , MASS. vs c�� it � P I Frr i �A 48A y 790 24 s.f. e A. ,y0 6 ff D9 4 8 B �. 7, 059 s.f. 0 48G ^ 32 S 0 81184 s.f. 59 `� b Jp{ oa �J �I NS<J• 00 SO' 'O E a _ o N N •� 7 (`0 s.f. _o r oz " 48F 6. ZG5J 71033s.f. — �� �� n N O IL. .. .. u� SII 48D a G 7;000s.f. 48E � �- V 7,0 0 2 s.f. L N M Wa kk rZ7 147.'74 (� Q N49- SS'-SoE 249.01 Lai —'�A�Er-� AceF_S Twc. WL1yNE J. >� G4�L a�M1TH I F l Q v/ W W li UGO ROAD _ APPROVAL UNDER SUBDIVISIIO/ N/ CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED. S5'7/ DATE : (gi#u of �$alextt, Aassarfluse##s cis ` iws , u d aug pull 'Salem, Anssnc4untis 91970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. 11 Salem, Mass., _d-- O h P ------(o---------I9—V To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ------ --- fh__4-_✓_e---------L'f------.1't[- -- lc_e---�---Nt----- -------a_N----A if des----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. �^ 1. Name of Owner Il_ N-- �'— -s>/1C 0 W ------------------------------------- Address QSIf a' ----st+------.. A- CO Mf sS---/----------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ------------�Jst_1-'JV------_'_`T'------_-U-V_v__c{-7—y-W [[�_I------------------- Address------------------------- ------ D AW-ALk.MI7— M Ass,------------- ----- 3. Deed of property records in ---------------------------------------------_----_- _________ Registry Book ------------------------------- Page -------------------------------- 4. -------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property- --------- --- -------------------- -------------------------------------------- — ------ ------ -----461— ^ -� ---�v[il----`:-9-/3 ,-t7-{'-- -�r__o�r_r_-F�---t-F�-art _Pi-Awj1vir----1n -- -11+'__h_�---- - -� e- ---...` G� Sf' COMA Eras .� --- a«f---Y11,YWfntG-- 11d[-.4-lla1--- -- -w-A-fe-y------� --a [/-W-------Cov-P --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner----- - ------------- Address ---5--y-- - _ '� FM'------M-AS9, - �ff a�-P -----5 --------- ---`S'�------------------ Telephone Number ----` yy 7--7.1 jY-------------------------------------- IVEp 0-4ty of gassadjusette CIT EtI,NuASS.Ytt effe Pau �alpa,,l9Rassacliusetfs 01970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. s Salem, Mass., --Q__G_fd_pQ_✓-- z---------19-7 I- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ---__1f__4__r-.v------- -5------- ------f-X°&Ao±'—m------Q-N---A-1 --- -344e 5------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- — -—— - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. (` 1. Name of Owner --rAA__x 1--------J----------`� o t tV-o vi swi--------------------------------------------- Address _�__-_ -----��'___ M �_ �r _ __ 1-'� t H-&s=----------------------- o IAGEk_5// 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ___�4-Wl_A1--_____-ri--------13-y--L_-C7_X,V-fSfl*------------------_- Address------------------------------------------DA_A(_vt_'AS-------- PSI----------------------- 3. Deed of property records in --------------------------------------------- ----- _ -------Registry Book ----------------------------- Page -------------------------------- 4. ------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ----------9f--- t,__A_rvA— --1-Y-1 5-A * j '-t r_n_N_ yN6_------Q-H-----Ca-NNFkS----cl �}u_eu 4-------k4. ,� �r�Sp�c --pK�i�erfX fi+ut� �'e" s� A5------ 7---C6W-NERLS_ ---- 7�4S�i'_elirfr_---'-'--b___fD_ A-4--- n----XaJ--,A----- ,aS-4*- ux-----$-9-- --of Cj--*y----- --- �s9Oe��5 = - ��x rFns fir; •! •^+ qac -Vd----rUJVjV.tN-�-----pd_�rk-'l--- � - Anew------A$----Co1L-IK_S-----Cov 0------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with The names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner----- � � t� (f Y_ t � - ¢SS,Address-----T---_ -Q - -1--- - Telephone Number ---------------------------------- O$G O®G? Sr 49j CON NEAP S F{�, t G°®i�ldPfLE®f��oM' � �C3�.® PL�i+sS rr .1 .1 ,yt Ci%4t„..:';V-'yam I} S Aloe/ L 0 t -1 G2 v t � � .OV6P14✓12V&-5216 d/-617s/0701 r F w r., 0 CIV 1}� tt nyy� N r �♦¢p}}Q THOMAS BERUBE �.✓ IV a �$afc , C."4lassa �4.Ksetfs ABBY BURNS 7 11 f MICHAEL FREEMAN H Planning A3'aarb JAMES GARRITY Y. • %rq4, � l JANE LUNDREGAN �Roont 7 -- Oitg all GERALD A GEORGE NO NORTHY WAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - - 10 . 21 . 71 This meeting opened_ at ';7: 30 P.M. with all members present excepting Gerald McCarthy, Tadios Sadoski and George Nowak, also non-voting member Michael Chandler. Mr. Garrity was elected to act as Chairman. First order of business - Form A - Estate of T. ,Louis O 'Grady; purpose of plan to correct an incorrect lot line at 78 Beaver Street ; on motion of Michael Freeman, seconded by Raymond Sweeney plan was approved and endorsed. Ratification of a plan previously approved for Inez Realty - Zina Goodell Corporation, 7 Dodge Street , made by unanimous vote on motion of Raymond Sweeney, seconded by Thomas Berube . A letter was read regarding a meeting with a Junior Planner from the Comm- onwealth of Massachusetts , Department of Community Affairs to be held on November 4, 1971 , at 7 : 30 P.M. • A letter, dated October 21, from Counselor George Vallis was read to the meeting, requesting release of Lots 204, 206 , 215 and 216 Buena Vista Avenue immediately, title is to be passed this week. Mr. Vallis pointed out that we still hold three passbooks in the amount of approximately $18 , 200 .00; there is no bond of Buena Vista at present . His client , Mr. DiBiase , requests an estimate be furnished him for amount of money that will be required for security to complete necessary work in relation to lots mentioned. Mr. Vallis said he would provide a bankbook for $4,000. to cover release of the four lots . In view of that , motion was made by Michael Freeman to release the four lots , seconded by Raymond Sweeney, with all in favor. George Nowak arrived and voted present . Mr. Vallis suggested that the third Thursday in November be set as the date for a Public Hearing concerning proposed rezoning. Minutes of the last meeting were approved. Members by unanimous vote delegated Jane Lundregan to attend a Seminar on Municipal Law to be held. on Saturday, November 6 ,1971 . The fee is $20 . 00 . Abby Burns reported on the Massachusetts Federation Regional Meeting. Raymond Sweeney moved to adjourn, motion seconded and with all in favor meeting closed at 8: 30 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, � �o/ / Gr/i-✓ Clerk � V Q� (9jtV R f $n jem &4 flassar4 setts THOMAS BERUBE t " u1 ,` (,�JJ V 144N) T�(1 LlYD L .K L Y ABBY BURNS �y MICHAEL FREEMAN • `j �. JAMES GARRITY .._ [ttrmin� uttr� 'ry. 1 aY JANE LUNDREGAN ci- OUII[ 7 -- (fitu �fidl GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK 10. 21. 71 TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING Form A - application and plan of Estate of T. Louis O'Grady 78 Beaver Street . Ratify endorsement of Form A application and plan of Zina Goodell Corporation, '7 Dodge Street . 1 . Letter from T. Kallock, Department of Community Affiars, re - application for HUD"701" Comprehensive Planning Assistance . • 2 . Notices and agenda of next Board of Appeals hearing. 3 • 3 Pieces of miscellaneous literature received since last meeting. fE ' f • /t coHo�r�_ of �$atem, �tt�b?XC��tse##S 0tg pall ,Salem, Alassar4uzettz 91979 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be w, ut attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must UU-th be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one UJ N a copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and UC): „ W W applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed p t' -; in ink. Salem, Mass., -----OCUNT 159----------------- e.POrming Board: The undersigned,believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and • state specific reasons) ____ it is for the our�ose of correction of the _ _ pj _ ln________tpa ----- _of_the_land omed_by the_s state of T. Louis O'Grady to_conformto___-- -----------------the limits and boundaries_ac�aally owned_b�theaazd_estate.--_-_________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ----Eatate_of-Ta_Louia 3'G__racly_----c/o -_Jamea-L.___9I_Grrcly___-__BXecutor Address 31_Grosvenor Park:-Ls_VBes.---------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor --------------Joseph-J._BaCa ®ne___-_ Address----------------------------------87-:ltarwett-1 -- A” §E--------------------------- 3. ---------------------3. Deed of property records in ---------------- _,�bhth_-----------__-___ __ _Registry Book ------2Y%--------------------- Page --------1h6------------------ 4. Location and Description of Property: ------Two-fgmjly-hougeA -------- --------------------at__78_Beaver ___-__-------------------at__78-Beaveree_t----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner--------- CL4 � O - ------- ------------- Address------- _ ___Grosvenor_Parka_Lynn _*_ss: Telephone Number -------525^7878----------------------------------------------- 2 zl�� F v I 2` b�s s t r , �, r ¢ ,:$ ` :�- , r t , f y a x, f ,{" r Al, + t ' r,, u + "�' ° r � r 5 t. y r c #� - 3 t i _ ' ��,,I Y 1 t k t 5 _4 4�.*- }4 t r i ! 1 S lig'- x { { b '1 a fi if , + /� :., r �' a , r� }, y r '�" ri W. Y d k GV, } x Y .{ > n y t +1 �� b A ',t j -- t ., is a , u r z -.t 5 ;.v . r= _ "� q ;p '.� ISO -:{ ,4 v t 0 r �� ,:- • a :w ♦ � i " fi f .. t 1 T O 5 ,h j w ti.� r ,� �j'i? t-: '*'4 R f 5 y ! f n i:. s 1 CY..TYI i S _ 4 i i, � - { MT t fa ' 'TO Por1 aCot3 { ' Porf4. 4t .,� ��f7 is �4 ; 53.o 2 ao ",� ,"T" 55a —1. ' —� I . I— + ' �_ . ; ; % p t , , sx} a 8 ti No.i f Gofoge N ' lt� (wood) t� , , d I - 1, t ' —I 4 il�$ts�°4 W �41 x`7819 ' ' ` v A R �A /2, 700s¢ t r',, j� Awe//inrr y li s } h rl I 2z sof')/-Wood I l r # _ ' �'� O1 9. ..i YI S ; •£ La r 444... , ! 5` M ,.. . 5 I S l Q 4 i ' qui t - V r �.� A �� t , i. � E 1 �' Let 7 , a �h 14 i I „ y o' j q ,�{ I i �OTg z 1 Y a �R `l x v i ''s >' 1 � . v v r. Ia� .5 i I ` r# ''j v 3 h { y Y ? F-Il -r. s d„�,, 1 f t i ...• �•� J.'ry K V- 'S^ � ' �" ,� /3960 r ,j� , . ,. r SAFF»RD �T I n SG a r 4 =:M/< Abf•a qr7! - ! 4 9 6 a + 1'l[ t �T .. t 1x , r.= x £' t 'b'�(yy r ]� - t..' ;..� r } rH. i 4 t 5, ry l Y l y d r u t{F S r ,i . r `s 5 d{ 5 , , fi `� ,1p * ri e5 ' { f i r ` yar ,, . f 1 G b N� i` i �s 1 e s; f r Z i ' .{f { 0 p t f x `� t. / ` 1 /[OTS �aree� vw l�GeMl�oeaq�eM ° 1+ n Sj OF, d . r } . . . eeati-4I d4- {ellewi141l ds�iga4h:wt LA ,1wfr c � r �a�t L 3 rt1. owNso Bd ; O ®aG f �-- F E sTA'1 :E OF T.. 4JiS ` h x s . .- R�DY _ Lot- 1. r SAL EMO A4A55 , i - : c:T.4, i97/ � Lo Sca/e / " D° accueaa. ' r L +I , ' i `� ` ;i "'.i T- 1, �{s�t 9- !':',`t 'r,#. �pprovou Jen .e subdv�s�on ,.x. 1 ,� r { , , i�tw�s.: �'.ONf/xOt b , iT�'TI t . i$ 11��txOFMI I i r r fr� f rl } %r . Q� / 'w `rt�t,r.�9uir�ed. a . v.,f V/4A- N/Nb' �O�•RO 4 °- ' d ` ea �I I03..PF .�3'��w :e C' >{t ti,1, LL U a `r t , ' S 'x H.. 1. > '' e ,r.4; ni �' xa !4Nrv'/SYE¢`l� a, a v , xt'rvr'; .. r, - r. Y 4 � ., a e 4i 8 ' d i } d' ,'' r r3da h �r:� r t h p �I r`e, ,� aV 4 � .. 40..tr 8' ' s i ,� {4 �i.r r— .-- .� � 9 1 ­ .; �.�� e "r' ri e ti g 'i 'I 9rR J �. d. ' F rc+ r n 7 yam. �, ' _ �"^ , t xi d s h", P It X Ws -, ?Y V- 141 7 A,l 77- 407w- -V'l u -j fl '0A ATION FOR ENDORSE J, W1, FT Its -A 'ED'NO, �v�,,,I'C-APPROV IXTO l:o,:"D-�l ,V a r i acco It or rep ,qdm W -1 -$U fm-4 this Foft,-, J!, the ajyo.,tgauou,mus Clerk kjo-'.th�n','6 Ed *i --V .`r 'phcafl6i�' e w --------- --------- a caj believing ct 1, 6tim was"a, i.6 U11;t I " ,Aarove p accep,,,,t pe,01 Subdiv n� & A 'A "T 4 PlAnu n rw pppio--vid n4ts,'WO'plantfOr 4e6uudnafiow.an&6dorsWentAh' g, �wy, v&' -nq -n q, rr -f me uWmow" mcd,"w IsTot lAn ex d - 2ahi.`,Obbdblfot r0oidb6j ac udj6ttV,�,�Ax,'iq�,� Lafa CUM Jh Ilk. a 8un +7 4-1 Aix .4, f W ee ;t"N ',E6�ejclSodhj)0tftdt Z omf�� 'rbcbr s L�413. YJ t � Reffist *4�,, at E Tq qj, "e, _qd:Street; 'jk�,"LAkcaq0n., (VUeS M kryv 5- 41 5, N pf j -4.4- 4;;j;, -7- PE A, 77"� i!r, byjAe C R 7Z, ygCy�.�,=t+-�= ' 5 s�tf I butt + , lot lines lobe sp ,ozi the�1a: ee With the rauies of th)t A with th 41'ro !'11w approved io'-V (-)wn M X", q wx-�6- M� P A V M07" A; WW ------ 31 ,iaTl X073 DOO�` /1 . Ist Aw ml hIN ,q- 6716 sF. c So s0z"/43o'il/ F` �-T".B..e4 fto//•-�' 4.4 �•-. �-.504°.79:SO�E of � o � n� o DPsc�ion�s' �ii�fny C'orn/ooy /rrc. i o Q.2 � yPf�/'��4�7D�r �✓�'aI+O%i5csj0/7 t .•.\ � �arll5n�,(DiY/707�/�U/%L?�U/�PI' o �/ 'SALEM PLAA/.V/Nq .644AW qi ,4.8807-sf : o px �9�'`9Y�TTE S�-�FET PL AN of L,41VO irr S.4L�M #b ' Prepared far 4� Zira �000'e// �roorQfior� scale: I"=20 Au 24 /9 / 9 7 �� An ESSEX SURVEY SE.e(ilM INC. 47 Federal Street 1;21 . ' ♦ rr �y }}} tt y� 7171 THOMAS BERUBE CtU o• $a1em, ,�assarhusetfs ABBY BURNS " MICHAEL FREEMAN (ttrmixcg uttrD JAMES GARRITY • JANE LUNDREGAN °NllHF.^" �Raom 7 -- CtU �ittll GERALD A GEORGE NO NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI 11 - 15- 71 RAYMOND SWEENEY MINUTES OF BOARD MEETING - - NOVEMBER 4MINUTES OF BOARD MEETING - NOVEMBER 4, 1��1 The meeting 'was opened at 7 : 30 P.M. by Chairman Gerald McCarthy with James Garrity, Thomas Berube , Abby Burns , George Nowak and Michael Freeman present ; Tadios Sadoski arrived shortly afterward. The Board Members ' attention was called to the matter of an appeal which had been presented to the Board of Appeals for a hearing; petitioner had been refused a permit to occupy the premises at 219-251 Washington Street for a gasoline service station in May, 1971; a copy of the early appeal, the decision on that appeal , and a copy of the new appeal were submitted for the Members ' determination with regard to Section 20, Chapter 40-A; on motion of Michael Freeman, seconded by James Garrity, the Board voted to seek the advice of the City Solicitor in the matter. A letter from the City Engineer regarding the amount of a performance bond required in connection with a proposed development of Highland Acres , off Highland Avenue was read to the meeting. Mr. Tedford estimated that sure- ty in the amount of $140 , 000 .00 should be furnished. This information will be passed on to the developers by the Board. A copy of a letter from Highland Realty Trust , dated October 22 , 19719 advising the builders of proposed apartment buildings, Pequot Associates , stating "It is understood that you will not be obligated to return the site to its original condition" , was read to the meeting. Mr. Thomas Kallock, Junior Planner with the Department of Community Affairs , arrived at the meeting as planned, with application forms to be filled out by department heads of the City in connection with a reconnaisance study required to obtain federal funds; they will put up 2/3 , we will put up 1/3; the funding situation is very bad, last year it was cut in half, and this year there may be 50-60% less ; there are presently towns which have been waiting for three years; the application forms presented will have to be returned within 30 days . Members discussed this program with Mr. Kallock who was most cooperative in submitting information pertinent to the study, and in answering questions put to him by the Members . ; asked about the establishment of historic districts , he volunteered to send copies of Chapter 359 of the Acts of 1971 to each member; he further stated that if we get the forms filled out and back within thirty days , he would do the study and when it would be finished would depend on how much data he received; he has other studies being done on other cities and towns , and as the funds must be applied for by the middle of December, he must know how many towns he is applying for to pass this information on to HUD. • 4F' .t 2 - Mr. McCarthy reported on a meeting he had attended at the Salem State Col- • lege with regard to the proposed I-95 connector routes , in connection with which, the League of Women Voters had suggested arranging for speakers , pro and con, for a proposed meeting around December 12 . The Members agreed with the Chairman, that a meeting to be held at a later date would probably be more rewarding if it could be arranged among all groups which have in the past showed marked interest in the proposed connector routes , in order to clarify any misunderstandings , and probably lead to resolving the matter for all concerned parties Members discussed various proposals with regard to having zoning mpas reproduced in order to be available for those requesting same . A letter was received from the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank relating to passbooks released by the Board to Salem Acres , Inc . A reply was dispatched verifying the numbers and amount on deposit in the passbooks . Newspaper copies of notice of a public hearing to be held by the Board will be sent to all Board members for study prior to hearing to be held on November 18 in the Council Chamber, commencing at 7: 30 P.M. All business brought to the meeting having been attended to , members voted unanimously to adjourn at 9: 45 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, CI LANNING OARD, e r k J L • rF SGP\Dl�' (f*TJ of �$ac , v4flassaruseT ts MAS BEUBE ABBY BURNS 1. MICHAEL FREEMAN m JAMES GARRITY f IttnninguttrD • STP J � JANE LUNDREGAN cums� Qotlt 7 �- TCt}i Pull GEORGE McCARTHY C� GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA FOR CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 11 .4 . 71 1 . G. Thomas Kallock, Junior Planner, from Department of Community Affairs . 2 . Find out about the last Board meeting 3. Does appeal of Edmond Richards by John Sera£ini, require approval of the Planning Board to be presented to the Ap- peals Board; it was denied May, 1971 . 4 . Letter from City Engineer regarding performance bond for development known as Highland Acres . 5 • Copy of letter from Highland Realty Trust regarding devel- opment by Pequot Housing Associates . 6 . Letters from and to Salem Five Cents Savings Bank relating ; • to release of security held by Board from Salem Acres , Inc . , 7 . Copy of notice of proposed zoning hearing. 8,. Notice and literature of BTPR Memorandum regarding 11 . 3 meeting. 9 • Copy of map of City of Cambridge . 10. Copies of recent decisions of Board of Appeals . 11 . Set up rule or system for dispensing with copies of Subdivision Control regulations , Blair studies , etc . 12 Miscellaneous literature received. • THOAS BER �i# IIf �IIEm, C FIBS�it Li$Pt B ABBY BURNSUBE MICHAEL FREEMAN .TM ' IMYt1iTYT "`3 O�TI� JAMES GARRITY j. ,''....' ..t • vr4ag � � CffTT JANE LUNO BEGAN Qp,y{ 7 �— �1lt�i -1T3 111 GERALD McCARTHY CR GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND.SWEENEY MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING 11. 18 .71 This regularly scheduled meeting was held immediately following the Public Hearing on proposed zoning changes in the Marlborough Road and Loring-Jefferson Avenue areas . Board Members present were Chairman Gerald McCarthy, Abby Burns , Jane Lundregan, Thomas Berube , James Garrity and Michael Freeman. Members voted to approve and accept minutes of meetings held on October 21 , 1971, and November 4, 1971 • Copies of a plan presented and endorsed at the Board meeting held on October 7, 1971 were submitted by Judge David Doyle in behalf of his client J . F. Sousa with regard to land on Jackson Street for signatures of the members for the purpose of recording; the vellum from which these copies were taken was signed at the October 7 , 1971 meeting, as not re- quiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. Copies were signed by the Members . • On motion of Thomas Berube , seconded by Michael Freeman, the Board voted to write to Ralph Tedford, City Engineer, regarding an estimate of the amount of money required for security to complete necessary work in a development of Salem Acres , Inc . , in the areas of DiBiase Street , Hart- ford Street , Sable Road, Buena Vista Avenue and Ugo Road, as requested by Counselor George Vallis , representing the developers . A copy of the Acts of 1971, Chapter 359 "Establishing Historic Districts" was brought to the meeting; Mr. Kallack, Junior Planner with the Depart- ment of community Affairs had promised to send copies for all of the members when he attended the November 4t" Board meeting. A letter from Jacob Berkover, District Highway Engineer with the DepArt- ment of Public Works , was read to the meeting. This was a notification that a section of about 1 . 98 milee of Highland Avenue is scheduled for resurfacing in the Spring, and advising that all necessary work with reference to structures , etc . , may be done in advance of such resurfac- ing and widening; no work will be permitted within the T;imits of the new hardened surface of the roadway, except emergency reppirs or work that is absolutely unavoidable , for a period of at least 'five years after the new surface is laid. Notices of hearings to be held on November 29, 1971 by the Board of Appeals , and decisions by that Board on petitions heard at the October hearing were brought to the meeting. This was the final business of the evening, and on motion approved un- animously, the meeting adjourned at 10: 45 P.M. Respecvfully s fitted, Clerk THOMAS BERUBE Tito of �$ttlem, c [assachuset#s ABBY BURNS f rp 1 MICHAEL FREEMAN Planning floar JAMES GARRITV • A Bio-y:•^! g JANE LUNDREG AN �LM.�'F. b QUtIt 7 -- TitU Pull GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 11 . 18. 71 1 . Minutes of Meeting, 10. 21. 71 . 2 . Minutes of Meeting, 11 . 4. 71. 3 . Judge David Doyle requests signature on duplicates of plans of land on Jackson Street ; plan approved and vellum signed by Board members 10 . 7 . 71 . 4 . Re-Letter to City Engineer in accordance with request for /7a .� ✓� estimate of amount of money required for security to complete ­�f?/L/�: _ necessary work referred to in letter to Board From George Vallis 9-1 dated 10. 21 . 71. (DiBiase Street , Hartford Street , Sable Road, Buena Vista Avenue , and Ugo Road. ) 5. Copies of Acts 1971 - Chap. 359 "Establishing Historic Districts" . • 6 . Letter from D.P.W. to Mayor Zoll Re-Resurfacing Route 107 - 7. Notices of hearings by Board of Appeals , scheduled for 11 . 29 - 71 - 8 . Decisions on petitions heard at last Board of Appeals hearing. 9 . Miscellaneous booklets, etc . f 8 :00 P.M. - - - PUBLIC HEARING, Proposed Zoning Changes From RC-R-1 To R-3 Districts - - Ward 7 and Ward 4 . a 4 • Minutes of public hearing held at City Hall , Salem, Massa- chusetts on Thursday, November 18, 1971. All members of the Planning Board were present, except Grace Sweeney, Tadius Sadoski, Raymond Sweeney and George Nowak. Chairman Gerald T. McCarthy of the Planning Board called the meeting to order at 8 p.m. Mr. McCarthy stated that the purpose of the meeting is to examine a request for zoning changes and to determine the facts.. Within twenty (20) days after the facts are-determined, a report is made to the City Council, and they will make the final decision as to whether or not the changes will be made. Mr. McCarthey then asked the Clerk, pro tem, Jane Lundregan. to read the advertisement which appeared in the Salem Evening News regarding this hearing on November 4 and 8, 19']1. Proponents for the zoning change were allowed to speak first: George Vallis; Attorney:- Mr. Vallis stated he is here to present his client' s proposal (DiBiasi Bros. , Inc. ) . He has heard rumors that his client intends to build high rise apartments behind Moffat St. There is no truth to this. DiBiasi Bros. , Inc. are major de- velopers in this state and are well known. References: Salem Five • Cents Savings Bank and Salem Savings Bank. Mr. Vallis statedthat the purpose of this hearing is to acquaint the Planning Board and interested citizens in his client' s proposals and to hear any views, recommendations and objections. The Planning Board will then file its report to the City Council and they will then hold their own public hearing. The City Council can then adopt , amend or reject the proposed changes in the city ordinance. This hearing does not grant his client a right to commence construction. Later he will present detailed plans for construction. Plans for utilities,,, streets, parking, etc. in the area. The plans being shown tonight do not show specific construction details, merely plans for areas for re-zoning. Young people are leaving Salem. Most of them leave for Beverly, Peabody, Hamilton, Wenham. The reason is that the lack of housing in this city is acute and the condition is unabated. Where can a young married couple find good, moderate income housing in this city? Where can elderly people , who have retired, who do not want to carry the burden of maintaining their own homes , find good housing? There is very little in the City of Salem. Where in Salem can a person build an apartment house? The main reason is that present zoning is not responsive to our needs , to the needs of the community in the area of housing. Mr. Vallis then pointed out areas for building on the zoning map. The Brea around Lafayette St.., R-3 is all built up; the area around Jefferson Ave. is all built up; the area around Highland Ave. is zoned R-3 and very little area there to be developed. • Colonial Village area has already been developed by DiBiasi Bros. There is an area off Highland Ave. , which is R-3, and has no sewer, no water, but is still zoned R-3. There is very little access to or off Highland Ave. 'There will be 350 units and one street (which will be off Highland Ave.) , off Loring Ave. on the Swampscott line. Mr. Vallis pointed to the candy striped areas on the map and said that his client wants this area to be re-zoned from R-1 to R-3. Major land developers are looking into open areas. How- ever, there are four (4) problems: first, physical impact; second, how will re-zoning affect the tax dollar; third, what is the impact on present utilities; and traffice and fourth, the aesthetic impact. Physical impact-- what can we expect regarding the number of school age children in the apartment house areas? Garden type apart- ments are not desirable for the raising of children. Presently there are 300 units at Colonial Village and yet only 4 school age children are living there. Twenty-four units at Continental apart- ` ments and no children there , and no children in the 40 unit Park Tower apartments. Consider a 40 acre tract. A builder could build approximately 200 homes. This could result in the existence of 500 children. 200 homes selling for $20,000 - $30,000 would yield $1,500 per house or about $300,000 in tax revenue. Compare this with 750 units which DiBiasi Bross ;proposes to build in this area, renting at approximately $250 per month per unit , and this would result in tax revenue to the City in excess of $400,000 per year. • New apartments are usually taxed at the rate of 20•% of annual gross income. Another fact which we will be confronted with is revaluation. In four years , 1975, all of Salem' s property will have to be re- assessed at 100'0 valuation. Revaluation benefits commercial and industrial property. For these reasons the City must get maximum use and productivity to offset the real estate tax dilema. The apartment house is the most productive to the City and it will do a lot for business and the economy in the city. Impact on utilities: - Drainage and sewage facilities - Before a permit can be issued, builder has to furnish plans that have to meet the requirements of the Planning Board, City Engineer, Dept. of Natural Resources , Massachusetts Public Health and City of Salem Public Health. The City Engineer has stated that the capa- city of drainage and sewage outflow in this area is more than adequate to handle this. Increased traffic in precinct 3:- Access to this area is from Jefferson St. , Tyler St. and along the railroad tracks, down Jef- ferson Ave. and Preston Rd. As the area is developed, new streets can be built connecting into Loring Ave. Four streets now have dir- ect access to Loring Ave: Sumner Rd. , Station Rd. , Moffat Rd. and Putman Rd. There could be as many as six roads to handle the traf- fic in this area. All we are looking for now is re-zoning. The • railroad abuts the land, which makes it natural for the train to - 2 - • handle commuting to Boston. This possibility becomes more realistic with the probability of rapid transit. This area can be developed into an attractive area in this city. Within the apartment complex will be swimming pools, tennis courts and recreation buildings. Some of the objections that may arise are that the apartments may require police and fire protection. The protection in a central area is no more expensive than a sprawling area. The homes which approximate Colonial Village have decreased in evaluation. There is an objection that construction in this area will result in blasting. There will be blasting. This area will be developed some day soon and it will be developed for homes , and you will have to blast. A good many of the people in this area would not be there if it were not for blasting. There is an objection that apartments bring in strangers, who are undesirable citizens. There are many citizens in the city for whom home ownership and maintenance are a burden and who would want an apartment and there are no apartments. Some of these strangers were brought up in apartments and tenements and eventually owned homes. There is an objection that the outskirts should remain undeveloped and untouched forever. If we want to pre- serve woodland, that is all right. But you cannot compare the bar- ren area behond Marlborough Rd. with Topsfield. These conservation areas have been labeled as conservation in order to discourage developers. DiBiasi Bros can intelligently develop this area. All Mr. Vallis wants is that the people help DiBiasi Bros. help the City . Mr. McCarthy asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of re;.zoning. No answer. Bill Porcello: Mr. Vallis says people in the apartments will not be strangers and will some day buy homes. In the meantime , these buildings will startwearing down. The money made on rents will be gravy until the people move out. Rents will be dropped because bmildings will not be able to be kept up. These apartments will not be build to the best standards but as cheaply as possible. This type of building is not going to last into the future. They will deteriorate and you will have strangers who are not welcome. Let us welcome children in single homes where they will stay there for years and the homes will be well kept,and they will pay their taxes and be good solid citizens. George Gauthier: Mr. Gauthier has been fighting to get rid of I-95 for the reason to conserve the area as it stands. There are lots of children in the area with mini bikes. We are teaching children responsibility by fixing machinery in the area. One of the neighbors wants to hunt and they have dogs. These woods are being used. People like us have bought there for the open spaces; so my child would not be brought up in some street corner. We want to preserve what we have there. The new connector will not solve the traffic problem of the 700 apartments to be built. As far as sewers are concerned. We have open sewage from septic tanks now. We should - 3 - rebuild Salem first. Why did DiBigsi Bros:: buy land where the road is going through when no-one else is interested in it? Why was that particular piece of land bouggt? Louis. J. Morin, Jr:- You are here to ,present this to the Zoning Board so they can approve it. You did not take into consideration the needs of the people within the community. You are representing one fraction of the community, the developers , the ones who want to make money. Swimming pools and tennis courts do not produce oxygen. Re I-95. If the people in this community have anything to do with it , it will not be coming through. Moderate income housing? The city does not have this. It needs low income housing, if anything, so we can get rid of areas like Congress St. and Derby St. In your presenting the views of the developer, you are presenting the views of someone who does not have the needs of the people of the community in mind. The 300 units in Colonial Village -- how about the income levels of those people? $250 a month rental is not moderate. This is going to produce a profit. The rents will eventually increase. Consider the needs of the people in the community not the developers. Jim Hosmaw - Asked about outlining methods of access and egress to ward 4 site and methods of getting sewage out to the city. Why did Mr. DiBiasi buy land that must be about within 0'0 of the I- con- nector? 5 � 95 vector. • Mr. Vallis:- He bought it 4 years ago with the idea that if I-95 comes in he will make money on the sale of the land and there'I is nothing wrong with that. It is of no consequence whether I-95 comes through or not. He bought it because he is thinking of tomor- row and next year. He bought it when he was half way through Witchcraft Heights. He has 40 more units on Highland Ave. , 20 or 30 more in Witchcraft Heights and then he will go to another com- munity when he is out of business here. Re sewage. Don't blame DiBiasi for that. What he proposes today is to bring City sewers in this area. Hehas installed a large trunk line along Highland Ave , off Mooney Rd and Witchcraft Heights area. He will eventually bring it down Marlboro Rd and bring it to his own land. Mr. Gauthier: The city can do that. Ray LeBreck:- ' The Soil Conservation Commission has been present at many re-study group hearings on I-95. We have made a statement that we are violently opposed to I-95 going through Salem because of the ecological aspect. Salem does not have much woodland left. He asked Mr. McCarthy that the Soil Conservation members meet with the Planning Board as they are concerned about losing any more land. Mrs. Mullin :- Opposed to change. It is a beautiful area. Wants to voice objection to re-zoning. • Mr.- Faulkner: - Are the 100 acres in Peabody also going to get apartments. If they are , it will mean miles of apartment buildings. Mr. Vallis. There are over 200 acres of land involved. I - 4 - I • have no objection to the land being kept for conservation if this is what the City of Salem wants. But why should my client pay taxes on it? People:- Let him buy it. .P7 r-q/o Carol-Lopardo: - Asked to see access road going into area. If access road comes on toga St. there will be accidents as that is a very bad spot. Mr. Vallis:- I want to go on record that neither one of us are in favor of I-95. We're not against it or for it. The fact is that there is a proposal for I-95 to go through there. Nothing we say hasanything to do with I-95 becoming a reality. Mr. Gauthier: One of the main reasons I am against re-zoning is that we are trying to save it for what it is. I don't want to see houses. We want to preserve the last remaining land. Mr. Hosman:- We can stop speculation now and refuse this , and we won't have to worry about it in the future. Roberta Wiggin:- Can the trunk line take all that sewage? There are nots of old pipes. • Mr. Vallis: It is presently a sewer line at Highland Ave. along the New England Power and Witchcraft Heights area. 'Eventually it will be tied around Marlboro Rd. According to the City Engineer, the sewer line is ad$quate. Mr. -Randem-:- How many units are planned for Ward 4? Mr. Vallis:- There are 40 acres of land. Re-zoning allows 1 unit per thousand square feet. It is conceivable that he could put in 300, 400 units or none. Mr. Random:- How many units in Ward 4 tract? Mr. Vallis:-100 acres. You could be talking 1600 units if I-95 doesn't go in. Mr. Gauthier:- Asked how many people are opposed to re-zoning the Ward 4 area. 31 raised their hands. Mr. McCarthy closed the hearing on Ward 4. And opened dis- cussions on Ward 7. Mr. Perron gave a brief history of Ward 7 and objected to any- thing being done there that is detrimental to property, property values or the area. • Bill Walsh:- Asked Mr. Vallis how the change in Ward 7 will - 5 - • affect the corner of Marion Rd. and Bradley Rd: Mr. Vallis:- It will not be affected. That area was subject to a sub-division hearing. It is still R-1. Wn, Joe :- I£ you get this change , can you put anything you want on it? . Mr. Vallis:- The Planning Board or the City Council can put restrictions on it if they see fit to do so. Once it gets to the City Council can be amended, accepted or rejected. A Mr. Win:- 15 or 16 years ago we assumed we were going to leave it that way. Drainage will affect it seriously. Let's keep it the way it is. Robert LeDuc:- Very little of Ward 7 is considered RC district. If zoning amendment is not approved, what will happen to this land? Mr. Vallis:- It will be developed by my client. Mr. LeDuc-:-- I would rather turn it into residential conserva- tion. It is incumbent that Mr. DiBiasi submit a set of plans in- dicating what will be constructed in that area. We have a right to know what is going in there. We have a plan now being submitted to the Urban Renewal Authority to get changes toward apartments. There • are other things to offset taxes. Sewage is a problem. We have an antiquated sewage system in Salem. Can we afford putting in new apartments? There will be a school problem, blasting problem, street problem. I propose that prior to approval, adoption or rejection of any amendment to the zoning by-laws Mr. DiBiasi should submit plans as to the type of apartments to be built, number of rooms in the apartments, and the manner in which sewage and water is to be pumped into this place. Then have another hearing. Vic, law- Egress and access through Moffat Rd. , Preston Rd. and Sumner Rd is already over-taxes and it is impossible to have more automobiles coming through these roads. Charles Michaud:- We would never object to sound, reasonable economic growth in Salem. But to have a project of this magni- tude located in this area is uncalled for. Would it be fair to assume that 750 units would average approximately 2 cars per unit? With the proposed B&M railroad station at the end of Moffat Rd, 3,000 additional automobiles going on these streets daily? I am opposed to this project. Paul Borsay:- What are the building specifications as far as the physical description for this complex? Will it be like Colonial Village or Loring Hill; condominium homes? I would like to have this information presented to the Planning Board before any changes are made to the zoning laws. Also agrees with the ecology;,-,issue -10 involved. We are not only losing our r4creation area, but are creating greater problems. Any further development would be - 6 - • inconsistent with the area. Single family homes only. Don Hunt:- The Conservation Commission is interested in acquiring all of the salt water marshes. We have to be concerned with the impact. How many people per unit? Mr. Vallis?- Average 2 to 4. Mr. Hunt:- That is a natural drainage area from Ward 7, Highland Ave. That is a buffer zone. Gvl,.e..Pxfm Mr. -Wal7ton:- Went to map and explained salt water marsh lands. Stated that the Conservation Commission has a definite interest in this area. Mr. Hosman:- Do you have to give a reason for turning down this request by law? Mr. McCarthy:- We cannot turn down nor accept. We make our recommendations to the City Council. We can give a reason for our recommendation. Mr. Hosman:- Speaking to Mr. Vallis - If this request is turned down, will you state that you will not sue the City of Salem to • grant this request? Mr. Vallis:- If we get turned down by the City Council and if my client decides to go to court to appeal, his chances are not good. I would advise him to go in there and build single family houses. Charles Grant:- Out of 70 names on Heritage Rd. , 60 of them have some from outside of Salem. How does this help the city of Salem? Mr. Vallis: The opportunity is there for Salem residents to move in. Mr. McCarthy took a count of hands opposed to rezoning of Ward 7. 77 opposed. Marcel LeFrancois:- Asked Chairman to read a definition of R-1 and R-3. Mr. McCarthy read a definition of R-3 zoning. Marie Whittemore presented her statement to the Planning Board as she did not want to use her voice due to a sore throat attached) Allen Carson:- Blasting is a problem as he lives in that area. He has cracks in his ceiling because of the blasting. It causes • damage to the homes. To put up a high rise or a condominium in the area is inconsistent with the other homes already there. - 7 - It will cause d4valuatio n to the property, in the area. He is op- posed to the proposed re-zoning. The hearing was closed by Mr. McCarthy at 10:10 P.M. NOTE: -THIS REPORT OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING BOARD SUBMITTED BY HELEN WELSCHER, STENOGRAPHER FROM AID, IN: , WHO WAS HIRED TO TAKE MINUTES OF THE MEETING. • • {}yy�� rt{r �y yy� ��1��}y►ttQ¢y� /�y�♦ }lf THOMAS BERUBE q _`Q Ctu o "Salem, 'ffl {ssarhuse44s ABBY BURNS : J 11 rry,T MICHAEL FREEMAN n i ']]q�IMITYTTYf aarb JAMES GARRITY • vs 'N <' C JANE LUNDREGAN �3vom 7 -- CtU �iMII -GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 12 . 2 , 71 R AYMOND SWEENEY Chairman Gerald McCarthy opened this meeting at 8:00 P.M. Clerk of the Board George Nowak and members Micahel Freeman, Abby Burns and Jane Lun- dregan were present . Mr. Freeman moved that the minutes of the last meeting be approved and ac- cepted, and with all in favor, it was so moved. Letters from this Board to Mr. Tedford, the City Engineer and to HUD writ-' ten since last Board meeting were presented; copies had been sent to all members prior to t4is meeting. Counselor George Vallis appeared in behalf of his clients with regard to requested rezoning in Wards IV and VII on which public hearings were held on November 18th. A number of spectators who had attended the public hear- ings were present . Chairman Gerald McCarthy asked if anyone had comments to make . George Nowak to George Vallis: How much of the piece of land do you have in •Ward VII, and how many single family homes could you build there if we rejected this proposal? George Vallis : Our engineer is preparing a preliminary plan for a subdiv- ision; when this is ready, we can have a better idea of how many homes could go in that area ; on the basis of what we have in Witchcraft Heights , we have about fifty acres of land up there, approximately 350 house lots . Abby Burns: Is there more ledge here? George Vallis : I don' t know what the terrain is like , you can' t know until the bulldozers get in there and check it out ; whatever blasting there would be in the areas would be where you see the higher elevations ( indicating on plan) . George Nowak: Is the Mayor and everyone aware that if we don' t allow this rezoning, there might be about 600 children there ; does the whole council know? George Vallis : I contend that if you build apartments , you will mt detract from the neighborhood; I would like someone to show me where apartments de- tract from the land; I feel it enhances the value of the land. There are some very attractive apartments in Beverly, Danvers , Peabody and other neighboring towns . I can say that our City Engineer on a previous occasion stated to the Planning Board as well as to me that the capacity for sewer- age and drainage outflow in both areas is more than adequate , and that these utilities may be installed without harm to the property of any other Person. My client put in a 12" line in the Highland Avenue area . - 2 - Chairman .McCarthy: I realize this is not a definitive plan, but is this in , •general what you propose here? George Vallis : All we are asking of the Planning Board is can we discuss or make a determination on is one particular issue , and that is , is this area '. which I have outlined suitable for apartments or, not? The determination you should make is just a general one ; if we come in .with plans and you do ' m t. like the way -we have laid out our streets, you can refuse the plan. Pointing to map) - these are the areas where we could put in .streets ; you have four and a possible fifth road .of ingress and another one out here . One observation I would like to make is , it is not necessary that the Plan- ning Board approve what I have presented. If you like the idea of .apartments you can mke recommendations yourselves as to how much of the area should be . rezoned; you can suggest where you would like to see access and ingress ; • dead end riertain streets; . you :recently approved a subdivision plan off Highland Avenue where there is only one street leading in. It can be developed to be one of the most attractive. areas in our City. Opposite this area is perhaps the most picturesque view in Salem - That of the Salem golf course . . I can assure you that this area will provide for far more open space than our present zoning requires . Instead of having, 750 units , we could go on record say in 25 acres we would put 250 units , .if this is something the Planning Board fe.els. is feasible : ' Michael Freeman: On the subdivision plan of Witchcraft Heights , there are 350 units in there with only one . way -in' and the same way out . �bby Burns : I don' t think this is the same Michael Freeman: The roads are relatively narrow. rl George Vallis : My client developedA'Witchcr'aft Heights in stages; these he aM.. .'. • p.y ,. intends to put in all at "once : Michael -Freeman: I think you made ,.ainice."presentation where .all of the traffic goes 'onto Jefferson Abenue . r Gerald .McCarthy: How tinehSland :does' he own? C George Vallis : A forty-acre tract , .all that is outlined .in' red pointing to map) ; the only use my client would have in this area is building single family homes or apartments , if the Planning Board sees fit to rezone for' apartments ; in this area indicating marshland on map) he could make a pond out of it . George Nowak to Chairman McCarthy: Did most ' of the people in Ward VIt object ( at the Public Hearings ) because of the, narrow, roads? Gerald McCarthy:,;;' think that their objection.was they. don' t want to change the character of"the neigborhood and increase traffic . Here George Nowak spoke about a meeting he had attended of, prospective devel- oers in the Renewal area , and asked about the- roadway . 4peporge Vallis : We. could put in a fifty or sixty foot road if that is what the Planning Board feels should be done. 3 - Saul Segal : The manager of the "F(Colbnial,) xapartments told me that there are about 100 children in those apartments ; -kMr,. , Vallis has stated that there �re no children there. '(He' the.n asked about the mini-shopping centerpro- posed for those apartments ) . George Vallis: Youcould make a stipulation that 'only a portion of the land be rezoned under certain conditions;. we are talking about 25 acres , say 350 units; we have 340 .unit`s in Colonial- Village, with eight acres of- land. , You would have a lot more open spaces and there would be a ldt less blasting. The objections that were made at the last hearing - just leave the land the way it is , don' t put in anything, apartments , single homes, nothing. The former developer put single family houses in there ; another objection was put just houses in there and forget the apartments ; in answer to the second view, putting single homes in- there , it goes without saying you will have more blasting, each house being built on from 7000 - 8000 square feet of ` land. Michael Freeman: About blasting, I saw construction going on when I lived in Newton, Massachusetts , and blasting went on and nothing got rattled: It is possible to blast and not rattle the people in the area . Abby Burns : May I make a point about retaining it as an R-1 district . I. feel very strongly, Salem needs young blood; the young people are moving out of the area ; if they could find proper housing, young families would_ move into Salem and raise their families . I am very skeptical. about '750 apart- ments in this area ; some occupants may have an interest in Salem but I would anticipate that a great many of them will be working 'in Boston and .have little or noninterest in Salem and will be Leaving in a year or two . You �an dispute that if you want to . George Vallis: We are. proposing R-3 apartments ,, the builder may put in town houses , row houses , condominiums ; a builder can not goon indefinitely build- ing apartments ; what,.he would. like; toi do, is;;put .in..•town':houses_.similar td Loring Hills condominiums , you build them and sell them; he would still like to, have some garden type apartments which he can sell •, what I want to get across is he is not trying to build high-rise apartments; there would- be no building more than two and one half stories high; some single family homes are higher than what he proposes to put in there . Mr. Labrecque : I am from the Salem Conservation Commission, and we have a letter in to the Mayor, and we have met with him regards to getting a full time secretary. We propose the City have -a master plan to show land areas , . what areas we would turn over to our future generations one of the things we want , would be to get this plan done , it is about a six months project for a full time employee ; certainly- we would not wish to lose any of the land presently zoned R-C . - We can get help, from the Federal government , 75% of the, vaulation of the land there we can buy it from the land owners., right? If some of this land is zoned from R-C I think it would be a serious mistake ; our problem is to acquire more land and not less ; .the Salem Con- servation Commission is against this rezoning. George Vallis : Do. you have. a vote on 'this? r. Labrecque:, Lt is in the minutes of the meeting. My personal opinion is o have single family homes . Mr. Segal: Does Mr. Vallis have any evidence that this is fact (Referring to the statment attributed to the City Engineer earlier with regard to adequate sewerage and water' systems ) . 4 "T'he Board assured him that the statement was made by the City Engine,eraat,.,a meeting of this Board held when the request for this rezoning was first made . .r. Segal stated he wished to see the roads made permanentdeadend roads . _ - Mr. Vallis remarked he thought he had made this suggestion. . Board member Thomas Berube arrived at . this time ) . George Vallis : We could do this by stipulations ; we would be willing to en- ter into an agreement , it would be binding and on record. If my client sells the land at any time , the buyer would be bound by the same conditions . Gerald McCarthy: How far up from the. Boston and Maine Railroad is:�thisrprop- erty7 George Vallis: About four hundred feet . ' A woman who did not identify herself asked "What about incinerators in the apartment buildings" . George Vallis : There is an ordinance now that says when you build you can not install incinerators . Mr. Segall,; "How close to therailroad property can you build in Salem by Ordinance? George Vallis: There would be a ,fifty foot road; we have had the land surveyed and we know how much land we .have ; you have walked around in there . Gerald McCarthy: They wouldn ' t be permitted to go in closer than what is allowed in that particular zone . Michael Freeman then 'read from the Zoning Ordinance" the density requlations for the R-1 and R-3 districts , stating "The point I am trying to make, the builder owning this land in an R-1 or R-3 district would have to comply with these regulations" ` George, Vallis : If we say we will mt have high rise , have all dead end streets , and subsequently I come in with a plan, I know the Planning Board wouldn' t allow it . Moffatt Road is very narrow, Pickman Road is even worse ; at least Moffatt Road widens "up a .little ; still if they ever come through there with MBIA you will haveta .lot of traffic . I* don' t go for high-rise, I wouldn' t like to see any . Peter Fuscaras : All of the people in the area are opposed to this . George Nowak: There were17 'people who wished to be recorded against the rezoning in Ward VII at the Public Hearing. Mr. Fuscaras spoke about the narrow width of Moffat Road, and mentioned the road conditions when there is a snow .storm. George Nowak stated the Planning Board" has to go to the City Council and tell em the recommendations of .the Board, and have also to satisfy the people the affected areas. Mr. Segal went back to the numbers of residents who had appeared at the public hearing, stating it was almost 1000 of the residents affected. _ Mr. Fuscaras then remarked' about the concern of the people for children s 5 - ,playing in the street , they don' t dare' cross Loring Avenue to go to the Park. A man who did not identify himself spoke about having a road come out up fur- er on Loring Avenue , and spokeaboutthe traffic conditions on Jefferson enue . Mr. Fuscaras is against more 'people bringing additional traffic to this area . Mr. Segal: If you are. measuring the ,number. of people at the meeting, there will be more at the 'Council hearing. i George Vallis : I live in this City. I ',thinkione ,:problem the City is faced with is provincialism. Salem is broken up into Wards . People should be con- cerned with the whole City. People at the hearing from Ward IV did not .ob- . ject to the proposals for Ward VIL,. .and those from Ward VII were not inter- ested in changes proposed for Ward IV. What we are discussing is trying to find the best use for this land. As far .as traffic is concerned, there are advantages of having apartments over single family houses . I would, so stip- ulate that these streets be deadended - Moffatt Road, Station Road, Pickman Road and Sumner Road. Mr. Segal: The whole objection- is the traffic problem, dead end thesestreets before you do it , then you can do whatever you want . Let ' s get a head count at the Council meeting, , is that asking too much, asking the Planning Board to recommend dead ending these roads ., Chairman McCarthy: Does anyone else have anything to say? Unidentified Man: The people who livein that part of Salem observe the traf- �c problems , strangers do not ; we have had many . accidents on Loring Avenue cause the traffic , comes so fast , the cars going to Lynn are hit head-on. Chairman McCarthy: Is there any further discussion on this? Thomas Berube : (Poi:nting to map ) . This is coming over the bridge . George Nowak: Could we get a ruling from the City Engineer about . the roadway? Gerald McCarthy: You could, do you want to discuss the road situations ,with him? Jane Lundregan: What would be the advantages of condominiums over single family housing for the City? George Vallis : I don ' t know if it makes' a difference ; my cl,ient would like .to put condominiums in there for the purpose of selling them. , Condominium s are built almost with . the same idea as apartments , but you sell each unit . As far as the City is concerned, I don' t think it makes any difference . Jane Lundregan: The question is what type of people are going to be directed to this area , what would be the best for the City? Answering Abby ' s 'question, .you are going to get strangers who will live for a year or so and move out . They give little but take from the City. orge Vallis: Older people stay for years , younger people stay until the ildren start to grow up and then start looking for homes of their own. There are one and two bedroom condominiums; people probably have a -little, more money, and want to have some equity in what they are getting. 6 Thomas Berube : Can you give me a percentage of the people whohavebought these homes? Worge Vallis did not have, this figure available . Chairman McCarthy: Does anyone have any recommendations he would like to make? George Nowak: This was in the form of a motion) . The only thing I would think now to keep the people happy is to have a recommendation to the Council with amendments to have Moffatt , Station, Pickman and. Sumner Roads dead end streets . Abby Burns and Jane Lundregan: Did not think that ' s all that ' s left . Michael Freeman: I think we could' consider rezoning only a part, of it ; , if we. recheck the conservation' rezoning that road can not go in there if they put in apartments , how can they get in there ; there are several . undesirable things , access to Jefferson Avenue and traffic might be generalized on the other streets. - I think it would. be better probably if we broke it up and make recommendations . George Vallis: ` We would have to get permission from the Department of Natural Resources. Chairman McCarthy: Does anybody have any' suggestions - if they would like to rezone the R-1 areal rorge Vallis : There are three other members of, this Board. I would hate �Co see for your own sake recommendation going to the City Council with three- people not voting. They could send in their own opinion. Gerald McCarthy: I think the Board understands more the feeling of the people in the area , .tike „all meetings with .a few ,people you can get an' a'wful lot more done . George Nowak: To explain the re'zoning"changes', on 'dead' end streets , these . would be Moffatt, Station, 'Pickmari and Sumner Ro3ads: Michael Freeman: Out of the forty'"acre." lane but not to include the whole parcel , 25 acres of 'land 'clo•sest,to"Jefferson•Avenue on the proposed .plan. Gerald McCarthy: How many units would be involved on 25 acres; if there were 350 units how many would be_.left for single family houses George Vallis : We own 80 acres ; what they are. asking is 25 acres' in a : " general area for rezoning; we would eliminate the five acres , leaving that .as R-C because that was included in the 40. - Abby Burns : How many single houses can you put in 10 acres? George Vallis : Excluding areas presently zoned •R-C I think about 5 or 6 ` acres in there , and of the remainder 40 acres if we are requesting rezoning 0 of those acres . As I say, `we „are putting 350 units now up on Colonial llage ,on 8 acres of land, and we are suggesting that putting in the same number of units in 20 acres . 7 - • A woman who did not identify herself addressed the meeting; she lives on Sumner Road, and is very much concerned about the traffic in this area . ' he was informed any traffic would go over Surrey Road, to the aright., Amendment suggested by -Michael Freeman: Motion would be to the proposed change to R-3 would not include the R-C area but .would include 20 acres of the originally proposed 40 acres , running south from the Jefferson. Av- enue end of the proposed area ; , entrance and egress from the following streets would not be allowed .- Moffatt Road,_ Station Road, Pickm'an Road, and Sumner Road; this motion was seconded by George Nowak, and, with Abby Burns and Jane Lundregan opposed,` this motion carried. The original motion by George Nowak was next seconded by Michael Freeman, and with Abby Burns and .Jane Lundregan opposed, this motion also carried.. . . Next item of business , proposed rezoning in Marlborough Road area of Ward IV to R-3 district .", k :. : .e, I t 1. [ , i• , . & George Vallis : Pointing out on map) Entire tract of land- here is 100 acres , 3/4 of it. is R-C zoned.., @ y ., 1, �."!5 Mr . Labrecque : The 'Conservation Commission would,- like to see the R-C zone remain as such because of our plans of buying land from owners in' order to keep. open spaces in Salem. We think we could make a good, area . of this= if we have. a master plan; we can not buy it unless we have a . master plan which would have a stipulation for getting paths , walks , parking and picnic areas It would be available for people now and 100 years from now to have these areas of of 100 acres in Salem. . George Nowak asked if the area . were zoned R-3 how many apartments it would be possible to put. in there . George Vallis : . If this is zoned R-3, can you concieve of a developer going . in there and putting in 700 'to 1000 units all at once? First of all, ,I don' t think there is a market for it ; _ a developer is going to,be restricted. more than for R-1 districts. . George Nowak: Where would you get the sewerage in. George Vallis explained the sewer line comes here , (indicating on map); his client would bring it along Buena Vista , Sable and down Marlborough Road•, he would get an easement through this land and bring the. sewer line down'; if, the City ever wanted to extend it , the people on Marlborough Road could tie into it . Mr.Labrecque asked if _the plan-could be left for at ,least one year until he . could get a master plan; George Vallis : Would the Planning Board consider rezoning at least a, portion of this area ; what is now R-1., or a, 'portion, (pointing 'on map) we have a little frontage on Marlborough Road; Strong Water Brook goes right' . throughthere , this is the area we are .primarily concerned with because we will ,bring the @ewer in; it wo'n't cost a; great deal to bring it along jWn , , ere so"if .you consider rezoning this portioof it , I .,could come up with some dimensions , probably one-third of it . "�i e — ,8 — • s 'Abby Burns: How many. units .are there in there? This could not be answered ,immediately) : George Vallis : The people would like to have City sewera,ge .come. in .there and unless my client develops it , they are going to stay there with back- ing up septic systems . We have spoken to the City Enginner about the City tying into our sewer; eventually we would have to have a pumping station on our property at our own expense. George Nowak You mean if the City did it they would save ; if your client puts it in, he will, have . to pay 100° .• George Vallis : You can' t have the City pay 1/ 4 . George Nowak: These men at the meeting on the I-95 connector routes feel - that these roads are really coming now and will come fast. Michael Freeman spoke about the areas involved in the proposed rezoning to. R-3 district , citing fromrthe. map ,submitted. as Exhibit A: F-2 , G-2 , F-3, G-3 , and F-4, the landbetween E 'and•,F, everything' to the right . Mr. . Freeman continued:,,. A,motion is. made.that +.the area be considered for m the proposed zoning.change • t.o R-3 , i . e ."-areas , on,EXhibit A F-2, _G-2 , F-3 , G-3 , and F-4, land between E and F; everytiiing' on+ the right : Thomas Berube seconded this motion, and with Abby Burns and Jane Lundregan opposed, the motion carried. •This was the final business of the evening', and a motion to adjourn at 10: 35 P.M. carried., ` Respectfully submitted, CITY PL N ING BOARD, .` Clerk' CIV y} y, y}� �}¢ tt �t }`T�+ THOMAS BERUBE �x �.Y IV fif Satem, �.i�(Assar4usetts ABBY BURNS MICHAEL FREEMAN JAMES GARRITY i (arming �IIttr31 v, F JANE LUNDREGAN c GERALD M.CARTHY yUUlli 7 -- �QI}() Fell GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 12.16.71 RAYMOND SWEENEY Members present at this meeting were Jane Lundregan, Gerald McCarthy, Abby Burns, Michael Freeman and Raymond Sweeney; Tadios Sadoski came in later. Vote on previous minutes was postponed until the next meeting. Representatives from the Regional Development Company discussed with the Board their plans to build two buildings on six and one-half acres of land at Pope and Proctor Streets. The buildings would be ten stories apiece, and consist of 284 units. 'They would expect the prospective occupants to be a mixture of young marrieds and older persons (empty-nesters) . The cost of therapartments would be $150.00 for one bedroom, and $180.00 - $185.00 for wo bedrooms':-'-A recent law prohibits the exclusion of children from apart- ments. Proctor Street is the approach street. Their basic question was whether you could enter an R-3 area from an R-2 area; this would be the only access road; also, as to parking, one and one-half spaces are required per unit. They would like a waiver of this requirement, although it could be done technically, it would result in very little open space. A more attractive site could be prepared if the requirement was not enforced; plan as such, would have one space per unit. They also pointed out that through the Rental Assistance Program, the Housing Authority could make use of 25% of the apartments. They pointed out it would be a good area for adults, conference rooms, recreation rooms, etc. are included in the plans. (Someone questioned the mobility of older persons at this site). Res ectfully submitted, /- y A ing Clerk �,ca�ulyi� ' t}y� R}r THOMAS BERUBE CtSl o �$ajc , �.'N�U�� �4l�L4�� ABBY BURNS 7 t 11 MICHAEL FREEMAN „� '7 ro ,f�0 - y,LgTAtt ltnjlZrt �� IIG�X� JAMES GARRITY 33 JANE LUNDREGAN � c � �toam 7 -- CtU �bll GERALD McCARTHY GEORGE NOWAK TADIUS SADOSKI RAYMOND SWEENEY AGENDA CITY PLANNING BOARD - 12. 16 . 71 1 . Distribute to all members , prepared copies of the following: (All clipped in sets for each member) Notice of this meeting to City Clerk. Minutes of last Board Meeting. Letter to City Councillors recommending proposed zoning changes to R-3 districts . Report of Regional Metropolitan Planning Council . 2 . Representative from Regional Development Company. 3,. Minutes of meeting held on November 18 for signature of Clerk. 4. Miscellaneous correspondence received. r - /r' � ` . /L/ / ✓�/sem_` i MA WIN AMA i ti � G --- \ r