Loading...
1967-PLANNING BOARD cowry situ of , asear4usrtts s�rL��� �[ttnttixt� �uttr� January 9, 1967 @von ,M. Grag, jr_ (Seralb T. ,fildfartilm MINUTES OF MEETING HELD - JANUARY 5 , 1967 oir4arl paskafuski 34 (94=4 *reef ,Albert P. Vitraff ttlem, �9Ulussttrltusefts psgmonb A_"faeeneg At the regularly scheduled meeting of the City Planning Board, held on January 5, 1967, members Albert Pitcoff, Michael Paskowski, and Gerald McCarthy were present. Mr. McCarthy was acting chairman. Minutes of previous meeting were voted approved and so accepted. Form A - Philomena Calabrese applicant, concerning a small parcel of land in the rear of land of Onelli on Bertucci Avenue to be conveyed to said Onelli in accordance with decree of the Superior Court, Mr. Pitcoff moved that plan be approved, motion seconded and so VOTED - Approved. Form A - Frank Litwin, applicant, concerning a small parcel of land, 46 sq ft, to be transferred from Lot 2 to Lot 1, corner of Buffum and Harmony Streets, to provide sufficient lot area for building pur- poses, on motion of Mr. Pitcoff seconded by Mr. Paskowski, plan was • VOTED - Approved. George P. Vallis, counsel for Salem Acres, Inc. , developers in the Witchcraft Heights area, sought approval of a definitive plan which was filed with the City Clerk on October 6, 1966. Mr. Pitcoff moved that the-.,Board proceed to advertise a hearing on this matter, the hearing to be held at the regular meeting of the Board on February 2, 1967, copies of advertisement to be mailed to all abutters; Mr. Paskowski seconded the motion, all in favor and so moved. Mr. William Raphael appeared seeking recommendations of the Board with re- gard to expanding the business of the Salem Glass Company, located on Canal Street, into a residential area on Hancock Street. The Board advised Mr. Raphael that this would be a matter for the Board of Appeal. A member of the Planning Services Group was present at this meeting for a discussion of the Capital Improvements Program. The Board suggested that this group provide the board with information on the Salem-Beverly Water Board plan and the Essex County Sewerage plan in order to have an informal, unofficial review of the complete program. This concluded the business of the evening, and on motion made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 10 :10 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, Jerk � Planning Poarb • �ahtt�. (�rttg, fir. Geralb T. McTarft January 30, 1967 r9JAichael paskafaski 34 Church �Rreef ,Albert A. 19itcaff �alem, �ffitassachusetts �Rttgmattil �(_"gfaeetteg MINUTES OF CITY PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 1/19/67 The second regular meeting of the month - January 19th - opened for business at 7:40 P.M., with Albert Pitcoff acting chairman. Raymond Sweeney and Michael Paskowski were also present. Minutes of the previous meeting were voted approved. Form A - Jerry Goldstein, representing Vera Warner, trustee of Highland Realty Trust, 80 Federal Street, Boston, explained the Form A application on-Tile.. . This concerned the transfer of land between abutting lots, leaving both with more than the required minimum areas and frontages on Highland Avenue, an approved road. VOTED: - To endorse. Next, the Board listened to a Mr. Raphael, associated with the • Salem Glass Company. His was an "unofficial visit" merely seek- ing information on any business before the Board concerning said company. The Board informed Mr. Raphael that there was no business before them with regard to this company, nor had there been in the immediate past. George Vallis, counsel for Salem Acres, Inc. , presented a verbal request for the release of certain lots of land near Pioneer Circle from the protective covenant. In order that this request be hastened, Mr. Pitcoff moved and it was voted approved, that if Mr. Vallis pre- sented his request in letter form to Mr. Pitcoff, he would prepare an appropriate letter and forward it with a copy of Mr. Vallis' re- quest to the City Engineer, Neal Mitchell, for his study and comments. This concluded the regular business at hand. Mail was opened and read. Meeting adjourned at 8:40 P.M. Re ectfully submitted, Jerk. • Planning Pvara • luhn fid_ (trap, Ir. February 13, 1967 &ralb T. ffir(garthg ,lAHir4ael Vaskufaski 34 (114 rh Atreet ,Albert �R. ?ditraff CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF "Salem, 'Massachnsetts �Ragmonb �. fneeneR MEETING FEBRUARY 2. 1967 Meeting opened at 7:40 P.M. Acting Chairman: Albert Pitcoff. Members Present : Albert Pitcoff, Raymond Sweeney, Gerald T. McCarthy. It was voted that the reading of the minutes of the last meeting be dis- pensed with as all of the members had received a copy and had read them. A Form A application was presented on behalf of Karolina Bakzybki, request- ing that the Board endorse a plan showing two lots on North Street and Carlisle Place so that the petitioner could sell one lot. On each lot there is an existing dwelling. A right of way will be reserved on the front lot so that access will be maintained for the rear lot. Motion was made by Mr. Sweeney that the plan be endorsed as not requiring ap- proval under the subdivision law. The motion was seconded and voted all in favor. A form A application was presented by Paul P. Guy of 15 West Avenue, • Salem, to transfer a portion of his property to an abutter. This ap-, plication was denied as the plan did not show sufficient information. A form A application was made by Frederick Meier for the Salem State College. It was requested that the board endorse a plan showing a re- lease of a right of way on property conveyed to the College on September 25, 1961. Mr. Sweeney moved that the plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the subdivision control act. The motion was seoonded by Mr. McCarthy, and all voted in favor. A form A application was submitted by John F. DeSantis and Paul DeSantis requesting that the board endorse_ a plan showing a redivision of property owned by both parties at 63 Bridge Street and rear East Collins Street. Mr. Sweeney moved that the plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the subdivision control act as all parcels would have sufficient frontage and sufficient area. The motion was seconded by Mr. McCarthy and all voted in favor. Attorney John O'Leary appeared in behalf of the Hewitt Construction Com- pany to discuss a preliminary plan informally with the board. He was advised to submit his preliminary plan to City Engineer Neal Mitchell for his recommendations. l�� I 2 A' hearing was held, :as advertised, on a Form C application by Witchcraft 'Heights, represented by Attorney George Vallis. He spoke at great length concerning the quality of the contractor and the boon to the local conditions that has been the result of his client 's activities. They have completed Od sold 70 homes and have 30 more under contract. Councillor John Butler peared and asked several questions. He pointed out several discrepancies in the plans submitted by the applicants. He pointed out that there is a blind corner at the northeast corner of Valley Street and Highland Avenue, resulting from the development, and stated that he has requested that the DPW install warning signs there. He pointed out that Summit Street is only 18' wide, and that the new plan would cause a traffic problem. Ord and Butler Streets are narrow and there are many children in the area which make this area a poor access to the development. Blasting caused many problems in the last development, and greater precautions will have to be taken this time. There is a house on the southwest corner of South and Summit Streets which appears to be beyond the street line. This narrows the street even further. Appearing in opposition to the development were: Arthur King, 7 Wall Street - pointed out blasting damage caused by the last development. He produced a restraining order against the blasting. He had a petition with 46 names on it, requesting that the blasting be reduced at the previous development. Richard Fanning, 55 Ord Street - expressed fear that a water problem would be created by the project. Pierre,Richard, 1 Richards Road - stated that he had received dynamite damage during the last project and did not want a recurrence. lector Chaprouet, 63 Ord Street - concerned about water on surface and in cellars. He stated that the fact there is no water there at the present time is because of the drought and not because any solution has been found to the old drainage problem that existed there. Mrs. Ellen Chapruet - stated that a dangerous condition has been created by water because of the last development, and she has water in her cellar for the first time in 15 years. She is considering litigation. Edward Whalley, 2 South Street = has an application in for a sidewalk which will make the street even narrower. Frances Parlee, 57 Ord Street - stated that the construction work makes a dirty situation, and that the homes, cars, and clothes have been covered with dirt. Attorney Vallis stated that there will be another development on thirty acres nearer to Marlborough Road which will afford another access road. He rejected , the idea that traffic from the proposed development will be a burden to the neighborhood in that area. There was further discussion about the drainage at lot 4 on Witchcraft Road. Mr. Pitcoff pointed out that Albion Street Extension would not be feasible. Crescent drive will be a dead end, and will need a turnaround. le 3 - The reply from the City Engineer dated January 27, 1967, to the communication from the Board asking for his comments as to proposed release to Salem Acres, Inc. , of a portion of the $36,000. held as security and also regarding a re- lease of a number of lots as requested by the, developer, was read to the meeting. The developer stated that while these matters are under consideration by the Board, he requests that we release lots #91 and #92 on Witch Way. It was moved, seconded, and voted that the Board release the two lots, and that acting Chairman Pitcoff execute a release of such lots, to be prepared by the petitioner's counsel. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Acting Clerk • • r City of Salem Planning Board Minutes of 2-2-67 rf Meeting opened at 7:40 Acting Chairman: Albert Pitcof£ • Members Present: Albert Pitcoff, Raymond Sweeney, Gerald T. McCarthy It was voted that the reading of the minutes of the last meeting be dispensed with as all o] of the members had received a copy and had read thea. A Form A application was presented on behalf of Karolina Bakzycki requesting that the board endorse a plan showing two lots on North Stbeet and Carlisle Place so that the petioner could sell one of the lots. Both lots have houses on them at present. A right of way will be reserved on the front lot so that access'will be maintained for the rear lot. Motion was made by Mr. Sweeney that the plan be endorsed as not requir- ing approval under the subdivision law. The motion wa6, seconded and voted all in favor. r t ! � • , A form A application was presented by Paul P. Guy of 15 West Avenue •Salem, Mass. to transfer a pottion of his property to an abutter. The application was denied as the plan did not show sufficient information. A form A application was made by Frederick Meyer for the State College. It was requested that the board endorse a plan showing a release of a right of way on property conveyed to the state college on September 25, 1961. Mr. Sweeney motred that the plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the subdivis- ion control act. The motion was seconded by Mr. McCarthy and all voted in favor. A form A application was submitted by John F. DeSantis and Paul De Santis requesting that the board endorser a plan showing a redivision o� property owned by both • parties at 63 Bridge Street and rear Fast Collins Street. Mr Sweeney moved that the plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the subdivision control act as all parcels would have sufficient frontage and suffieient area. The motion was seconded by McCarthy and all voted in favor. Attorney OtLeary appeared in behalf of the Hewitt Construction Co. to discuss a preliminary plan informally with the board. He was advised to submit his pre- liminary plan to City Engineer Neal Mitchell for his recommendations. A hearing was held, as advertised, on `a Form C Application by Withhcraft Heights. The applicant was represented by Attorney George Vallis. He spoke at great length concerning the quality of the contractor and the boon to the local conditions that has-been the result of his clients activities. They have completed and sold 70 homes and have 30 more under contract. Councillor John Butler appeared and asked several questions . He pointed out several discrepencies in the plans submitted by the applicants. He pointed out that there is a blind corner at the northeast corner of Valley and Highland Ave, resultinf from the new devel- opment and stated that he has requested that the DW install warning signe there. He pointed out thet Summit Street is only 1$1 wide and that the new plan would ffi cause antraffic problem. Ord Street and Butler Street are narrow and there are many children in the area which make this area a poor access to the development. Blasting caused many problems in the last development and greater precautions will have to he taken this time. There is a house on the southwest corner of South and Summit Street which appears to be beyond the street line. This narrows the street even further. Appearing against the development were: • Arthur King 7 Wall Street Salem, Mass. - pointed out blasting damage caused by the last development. He produced a restraining order against the blasting. He had a petetion with 46 names on it requesting that the blasting be reduced at the previous development. 4 1 Richard Fanning 55 Ord Street Salem, Mass. expressed fear that a water problem would be created by the project. m Pierre Richard 1 Richards Road Salem, Mass. stated that he had received dynamite • damage during the last project and did{not brant a recurrance. Victor Chaprouet 63 Ord Street Salem, Mass. Concerned about water on surface and in cellars. He stated that the fact that there is no water there at the present time is because of the drought and not because any solution has been found to the old drainage problem that existed there. Mrs Ellen Chapruet stated that a dangerous condition has been created by water because of the last development and she has water in her cellar for the first time in 15 years. She is considering litigation. Edh-rard Whalley 2 South Street, Salem, Mass. has an application in form sidewalk which will make the street even narrower. Frances Parlee 57 Ord Street Salem, Mass.' stated' that',the construction work makes a dirty situation and .tha't the homes, cars, and clotles have. been covered with dort. George Vallis stated that there will be another development on 30 acres nearer to Marlboror Rd. which will afford another access road. He rejected the idea that traffic.from the proposed development will be a burden to the neighborhood in that area. There was fhmther discussion about•the drainage at lot G on With4— craft Rd. Mr. Pitcoff pointed out that-Albion Extension would not be feasible. Crbscent Drive will be a dead end and will ne'ed,a.turnaround. The ly,,, 6 thq City�Eh a eer;e,dated,Janaa,:t- 3 6�, to tip cdmmt#riibatrrsxi-*€2 om �Ye yd'rci�a's f The reply of the City Engineer dated January. 27, 1967, to the communication from the board asking -for his comments as to proposed release to Salem Acres, Inc. • of a portion of the $36,000. held as security and'also regarding a release of a number of lots as requested by the developer was read to the meeting. The developer stated that while these matters are under consideration by the board; he requests that we release lots 91 and 92 on Witch Way. It wa's moved, seconded and- voted that the board release the two lots and that acting chairman P Pitcoff execute a release of such lots, to be prepared by the petitioners counsel. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30Rz J w� (situ of '*ttreut, assarhusetts �1ahn . Orap, �Jr. February 27, 1967 Geralb X. �MrlIIarthV Aichael Juaskafuski MINUTES OF MEETING HELD — FEBRUARY 16, 196 4 CIhurrh j6trert Albert A. Vitraff em, �.fassarhusetts �RagmanD �. �fneeneg This meeting was opened at 7:40 P.M. by acting chairman, Mr. Pitcoff. Mr. Sweeney and Mr. McCarthy were in attendance. The reading of the minutes of the previous meeting was dispensed with and voted accepted. The order of business for the evening consisted of four form A's, the first presented by Raymond Cummings, Trustee of the Loring Realty Trust, concerning a parcel of land containing 7040 square feet on Station Road, shown as Lot A on plan. On motion of Mr. Sweeney, seconded by Mr. Mc Car= thy; the Board voted unanimously to endorse as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. A form A concerning land on Vinnin Street, shown as Lot 10 on plan, was presented by Attorney Hyman Marcus; land is to be transferred to the Stop and Shop. Mr: Sweeney-moved that plan be endorsed as not requiring approval under the subdivision Control Law; motion was seconded by Mr. • McCarthy and it was voted to endorse. A plan of land designated as lot B in rear of #13 West Avenue was next submitted for approval with a form A. This parcel is to be transferred from the present owner, Paul P. Guy to Howard D. and John A. Mansfield. On motion made and seconded, the Board voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the subdivision control law. The fourth Form A was presented by Roland A. L'Heureux. His plan showed lots #1 and #2 on Dearborn Street. On motion of Mr. Sweeney, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, all voted in favor to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the subdivision control law. This concluded the business brought to this meeting, and on motion made and seconded, all voted to adjourn at 8:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • CONDI fit# of *alem, f ttssarhu e##s yT � e ]]fanning Pvarb ��2allu �. (1Nrttq, fir. (Seralh Z. McCirt4U March 14, 1967 �flir4ael Vashafashi 34 @Illurclt �_61reet ,Albert �R. Fifraff 'Salem, �fflflttsattchuseffs Fagmaub 3r. 'Sfueetteg MINUTES OF MEETING - - MARCH 2. 1967 The first regular meeting of the month was held by the Planning Board on March 2, 1967, with Gerald McCarthy acting chairman. Other members present were Raymond Sweeney and Michael Paskowski. There was no business on the agenda nor did any come in while the meeting was in session. Only the routine mat- ters of signing the previous report and the disposal of mail on hand required attention. Meeting was opened at 7:30 P.M. and adjourned at 8:30 P-M- • Respectfully submitted, Clerk • A ft111itu of '$UIem, f ttssarhusetts �Juhn S_ (brag, 3r. N /✓ ll.. March 23, 1967 (Scralb Z- fflr@Iarthg Michael Vasksfuski 34 (91lurth *rret Albert eft. Vitcuff MINUTES OF MEETING - - MARCH 16, 1967 Jalem, filassachuortts �(agmsnD�(.�(neeneg The meeting was opened at7:40 P.M. by acting Chairman Gerald T. McCarthy. Members Michael Paskowski and Albert Pitcoff were in attendance. George P. Vallis, counsel for Salem Acres, Inc., and Mr. Joseph Carter, an engineer for the company appeared, also Neal B. Mitchell, City Eng- ineer. A discussion of a definitive plan of land on and off Ord Street, Witchcraft Road, Summit Street, and Albion Street Extension, followed. The Planning Board had previously requested advice from the City Engineer regarding the suitability of this plan. A reply had been received, dated October 18, 1966, in which his recommendations were listed. At this meet- ing, these points were discussed and agreements reached to have this plan conform to the rules and regulations of subdivision control. • Salem Acres, Inc. , through Counsellor Vallis, next presented a Form B ap- plication for tentative approval of a preliminary plan of approximately seven acres of land off Highland Avenue, Proctor Street, and Hillside Avenue, on which the developer,proposes to erect apartment house buildings. The Board voted to write to the City Engineer for his comments on these plans. Counsellor Vallis, for his client, Salem Acres, Inc. , requested the release of some of the money held by the City under protective covenants. This request was taken under advisement. This concluded the business brought to the meeting, and on motion made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 10:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, er • ���°°'"� �IttztnixT$ �uttrD Sohn ,ffi. Grail, Jr. April 12, 1967 Geralb IT. ffidTart4g �fflirhnel ?Aasfiduski MINUTES OF MEETING - - APRIL 6, 1967 34 @Ihurrh �$treet ,2Athrrt F. Vitraff 'Salem, fflassarhusetts �l2agmana . 'Sfueeneg The meeting was called to order at 7 :40 P.M. by Acting Chairman Raymond F. Sweeney. Other members in attendance were Albert Pitcoff, Michael Paskowski, and Gerald McCarthy. Board voted approval of accepting minutes of the previous meeting. A Form A application was presented by Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster for Parker Bros. , concerning a parcel of land on Bridge Street bounded by St. Peter Street, Howard Street, and land of the Boston & Maine Railroad. On motion made and seconded as not requiring approval under the subdiv- ision control law, it was VOTED - To endorse. A form A application was next presented by George Vallis, counsel for DiBiase Realty, for endorsement of a plan of land on Highland Avenue, consisting of two parcels., each of which will have sufficient frontage • on Highland Avenue, and sufficient area to meet Zoning requirements. On motion made and seconded, it was VOTED - To endorse. A letter from the City Engineer, dated March 27, 1967, regarding a prelim- inary plan of land off Highland Avenue, Proctor Street, and Hillside aven- ue, was read into the record. The Board recommended that a copy be sent to counsel for DiBiase Brothers, indicating the questions the City Engin- eer has brought up, and see what can be done to resolve them. A letter from the Planning Services Group, accompanied by copies of four bills to be sent to the . State _Legislature was read.. The Board voted to notify Senator Kevin Harrington that they favored passage of these bills, specifically H-4064, S-576, H-3466, and H-236, copies of which are in the files. The Board also voted to invite Mr. Morton Braun of the Planning Services Group to attend a Board meeting in the near future to inform the Board as to which programs the City of Salem should enter into. The acting chairman read a draft of the annual report prepared by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr., of the activities of the Board during 1966. This was approved unanimously, and will be forwarded to the Mayor and the Council. An invitation to the Board Members to attend an all-day seminar on Munici- pal Law at John Hancock Hall in Boston, on April 22, 1967, was received and some members indicated they plan to attend. - 2 Salem Acres, Inc. , through Counsellor George Vallis, applied for approval to permit construction of dwellings on Lots 4, 5, and 6 Witchcraft Road, and on motion of Mr. Pitcoff, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, it was voted that the plan be given the following endorsement at this time : "With reference to the new lot lines shown on the plan as to Lots 4, 5, and 6 ONLY, approv- al under the subdivision control law is not required". Mr. Vallis then sought release of securities held under protective coven- ants for his client, Salem Acres, Inc. ; The Board voted to request the City Engineer to inform the Board of his views regarding completion of roads bounding Lots 24 to 51, inclusive, 84 to 88 inclusive, 112, and 113 ; also, for his comments on the satisfactory completion of roads, curbs, and sidewalks bounding lots 79 to 83 inclusive, and 52 to 56 inclusive. Salem Acres, Inc. , through Mr. Vallis, then sought the release of Lots 1, 2, 3, 9 to 23 . inclusive, and 89 to 97 inclusive, on plan 55 recorded in Plan book 104, in consideration of posting with this Board a bank account in the amount of $16,000 for the completion of the work, and also a with- drawal order accompanying said bank book. On motion of Mr. Pitcoff, the Board voted all in favor. • All business brought to this meeting having been acted upon, on motion unanimously approved, the Board adjourned at 10:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • s (IT of ��lem, �ttssttc�lz�e#ts � .K�ti� �Ittnnizf$ �uttrb ' �Jshn . �rttg, fir. May 2, 1967 Gerald T. fiic4larft Airhnel Vaskufushi MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING 4/20/67 34 @Ihurrh f4trret ,Albert �R. �itrvff 'ittlem, Alussarhnsrits �RttgmunL . "fneeneg Gerald McCarthy, Acting Chairman, and Albert Pitcoff and Michael Paskowski Board members present at -,the meeting. The main feature of the meeting was a surprise visitation by a sizable group from Witchcraft Heights with a drainage grievance. People were already wait- ing when the doors were opened, and by 7 :30 the crowd extended into the hall- way and down the stairs. The members present were completely in the dark as to what was coming until Councilor John Butler came in and shed some light. It was his show. As the first order of business, the councilor was given the floor to speak for the group. He explained how during the recent rainy period, the catch basins in the Gables Circle and Gallows Hill Road area were not handling the water run-off properly. He referred to a letter from Neal Mitchell on this matter, dated April 19th, just a day earlier. It was found on file with numerous copies thereof. By a coincidence, the developer's engineer • and attorney were also at the meeting, but on other matters. As in all such matters, the routine proceedure of giving a copy of the City engineer's letter to the developer's representative for action was completed on the spot, and the show was over in minutes, perhaps in record time. Counsel for the developer, George Vallis, was understandably angered by his client being by-passed with this complaint. Next Building Inspector Daniel O'Brien was heard relative to the proposed changes in Ordinance. It was suggested and all agreed that a special infor- mal meeting be called for this purpose alone, on such a date, time, and place, convenient to the convalescing chairman. Hon. David Doyle, with his client, announced that Preliminary Plans to develop three lots on both sides of Frederick Street - a dirt dead end road off Bell- view - would be reactivated. It was first presented to the Board by the late Attorney John O'Leary. Mr. Doyle stated that they talked with the City eng- ineer, Neal Mitchell, and are now incorporating his suggestions in the plan. The Form A application of Alice Buckley to combine three sub-standard size lots into one of approximately 100' x 75 ' with frontage on a way in being, was approved. • - 2 • Next on the agenda, were Counselor George Vallis and Engineer Joseph Carter, representing Salem Acres, Inc. , The subject was sub-division plan - Witch- craft Heights - Crescent Street and Summit Street, dated June 1, 1965, on which a hearing was held February 2, 1967. At the previous meeting on this same subject, it was noted that the developer had fulfilled all the requirements as itemized by Mr. Mitchell, with the ex- ception of rebuilding 200 feet of sewer between manholes which was too flat. Since, this section was rebuilt so the., project was voted approved. A letter notifying the City Clerk of the Board's approval was to be dispatched in order that a performance guarantee would be released. On the subject of Deiiases ' Preliminary Plan for an apartment house develop- ment on a lot bounded by Highland Avenue, Proctor Street, and Hillside Ave- nue, an informal discussion was held. It amounted to a progress report by Counselor Vallis and Engineer Carter. They also brought in plans showing that suggestions of Mr. Mitchell were being incorporated. This completed business on file. New mail was opened and disposed of. Meeting was adjourned at 10:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • i 01-13tu II �S�PItt� 2ISSttC 1t8P T � Planning Poarb Jalln 0- Crap, Mr_ May 10, 1967 GeralD T. Adc ar}hll plbert l . Vitraff MINUTES OF MAY 4. 1967 MEETING 34 (, fflat arouse ,Albert �_ �ifcaff �ttlem, �{assacfluse}fs �ttgmanD �_ �fneeneg At the regularly scheduled meeting of the City Planning Board, held on May 4, 1967, Chairman John M. Gray, Jr., presided with Members Albert R. Pitcoff and Gerald T. McCarthy in attendance. The meeting was opened at 7 :30 P.M. The first order of business was a Form A application, pre- sented by Raymond L. Cummings, Trustee of Loring Realty Trust. Mr. Cummings presented a plan showing lots A, B, and C Sumner Road, each having sufficient frontage on a public way. It was voted approved as not requiring ap- proval under the subdivision control law. • John Laskaris, counsel for Charles M. Zolotas, next presented a plan showing lots A and B on School Street. It was moved to endorse this plan also as not requiring approval under the subdivision control law. Henry G. Boucher, through his attorney, George P. Vallis, presented a form A application together with a plan showing lots 1, 2A, and 30A ,Champlain Road and Arthur Street. This plan was also approved as not requiring approval under the subdivision control law. A letter from Counsel George Vallis, representing Salem Acres, Inc. , requesting release of $16,000. held under protective cov- enants was read. On motion made and seconded, it was voted to release these securities, ( in the form of two bank books, one for $10,000. and the other for $6,000) . The Board also voted to accept the equivalent of this release from the developer, in connection with other lots later approved. Mr. Morton Braun of the Planning Services Group, as requested, attended this meeting. Mr. Braun spoke of various matters, in particular the necessity of a new complete Neighborhood Analysis. He and the Board agreed to meet again for further discussions, at a time other than a regularly scheduled meeting. The business of the evening having been completed, it was voted • to adjourn at 8:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk �HDl� f1Uit ofS�z�em, ttstttl�ixse#ts `�'cim—w oma' ]JIanning IItIY� Mahn 'A. Grafi, Mr. Geralit T. MrTurft Airhael Vashufuski MINUTES OF MEETING - - MAY 18, 1967 34 (L<hurrh Street ,Albert P. Vitraff 'Salem, fflassarhusrits paumuuit A. "�fueeneg Meeting was opened at 7 :30 P.M. by Acting Chairman Michael Paskowski. Other members present were Albert R. Pitco£f, and Gerald T. McCarthy. Minutes of previous meeting were approved and voted accepted. Counselor George Vallis presented for endorsement a plan of land of Salem Acres, Inc. , which had been approved by the Board on April 20, 1967, with a Certificate from the City Clerk, and on motion made and seconded it was voted to endorse this plan. In connection with the foregoing vote, Counsel for the petitioner submitted a Protective Covenant relating to the lots shown on the approved plan, 4 through 8 inclusive, 28 and 29, and 128 through 155 inclusive. A copy of the Protective Covenant was left with this Board. Counsel for the applicant undertook to record the Protective Covenant at the Registry of Deeds. Next Counselor Vallis discussed construction of proposed apartment build- ings by his client Salem Acres, Inc. , on Highland Avenue. He is trying;to get the approval of the City Engineer who recommends catch basins 400 feet down on Highland Avenue. Mr. •Carter, engineer for the developer, will check the plan of land of the proposed apartments, and show where surface water will drain off. Mr. Vallis next zhowdd a plan of a proposed development by Salem Acres, Inc., for the future, encompassing land from Gables Circle to Outlook Avenue. Mr. John Jermyn appeared with a plan of land on Ravenna Avenue on which he proposed to build. The Board suggested he get a letter from the City Eng- ineer about his requirements for the installation of utilities. Mr. Jer- myn will contact Mr. Mitchell for this information. A letter from Richard Matton requesting permission to extend the sewerage on Day Avenue from Lot M to Lot L as shown on submitted plan was read, and on motion made and seconded, the Board voted to write to Mr. Mitchell for his recommendations. This concluded the business brought to the meeting, and it was voted to adjourn at 10:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, • C er t waorcy� CtU of �$aiem, fflttssar4nutts Planning Pvarbr �Jtthn fir. �ffieag> J=• June 14, 1967 (�exat3lc�axthg RECORD O e $et askofu4i _ F PUBLIC HEARING HELD MAY 1 1967 34 Q11lttLeh M=eet Albert �R" juitcaff Salem, �4llfassachusetfs �l2ttgmunil " �fteeneg On May 31, 1967, the Planning Board of the City of Salem, held a public hearing, conducted as follows : Part I - Amendments to the Rules and Regulations Governing Sub- division Control Part 2 - Amendments to the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance This hearing was held in the Council Chambers and was::chaired by John M. Gray, Jr. , with Albert Pitcoff and Michael Paskowski in attendance. City officials present and participating were--Councillor Edmond J. Perron, and Building Inspector Daniel J. O'Brien, Jr. The audience consisted of six at the beginning and swelled to twenty-five as the meeting progressed. Copies of the newspaper advertisement were made available to all, and were used as a basis in conducting the hearing. • PART I The meeting was called to order at 7 :40 P.M. with Part I first on the agenda. The chairman made a brief introduction and laid down the rules of the hearing, namely, that parliamentary law would be followed and that this would not be a forum for debate but that speakers for the affirmative and negative would be heard and their views recorded for future consideration. Work was begun with the reading of the notice by the clerk. Then the chairman followed the routine of taking each article or sub-article sepa= rately and in order, and explaining the nature, meaning, and purpose of the change. Next, the chairman asked for speakers in the affirmative, then the negative. Quick progress was being made as there were no speakers pro or con in the first nine articles. Then Attorney George Vallis came in and asked for backtracking. He asked for clarification of Article 2 (Definitive Plan should have sufficient data not to require two or three e return trips ), Ar- ticle 6 and Article 7 (Granite Curbing still required) . As expected, Article 10 which deals with the inspection of underground installations before covering produced considerable discussion. Speakers were : Councillor Edmond J. Perron, • Ernest Belleau, 35 Belleau Road, Salem Thomas Johnson, 221 Castle Road, Nahant Henry Boucher, 11 Fairfield Street, Salem Attorney Raymond Cummings, 3 Federal Court. 2 - The chairman summarized, and Councillor Perron concurred that even though the city has competent men who could inspect work at a subdivision • as required by Ordinance, the fact of the matter is that they are not al- ways available immediately when desired. This holds up the developers, and can mean a considerable loss of time and money to them. It is also clear that for the City to hire an inspector for this pur- pose, it would be necessary to create a full time Civil Service position. This could not be justified as there is not enough work for a full time inspector. The article proposes that in order to circumvent Civil Service, the developer place a part time inspector on his payroll who would be avail- able on call. This inspector would be of the City Engineer's choosing and responsible to him. William Mahoney, 8 Castle Road, Salem, stated that in his opinion, an inspector working for the City but being paid by the developer constituted a conflict of interest. Article 11 had no speakers. Article 12, dealing with underground utilities produced a lively dis- cussion. Statements made, but not necessarily in order, were as follows : Chairman John Gray said that the telephone and electric power companies told him that they are going underground in all future Salem installations. The ;amendments are simply spelling this out. • Councillor Perron asked whether a single trench could be used for all pipe and cable installations. Mr. Cummings said that in ledge areas, the requirement of separate trenches for pipe and placing telephone and power lines underground would be too costly, and price the lot out of the reach of the market. Mr. Belleau said that blasting could damage underground wiring, and could create danger from electrocution. The remainder of the articles had no speakers, pro or con, and the hearing was rapidly concluded. Intermission was called. PART 2 After a short recess, the chairman called the meeting to order at 9:20 P.M. for Part 2 of the hearing. Again, copies of the newspaper ad- vertisement were used as a basis . Work was begun with the reading of the newspaper notice by the clerk. Next, each article was taken separately and in order, and read by the clerk. • - 3 - The chairman would follow with appropriate remarks of explanation, such as • "a better definition", " a new definition", "straighten out a zoning line", etc. , as the case may be. Questions or comments from the audience were gen- erally for the purpose of clarification. . Finally, the chairman asked if there were any pros, then, any cons, and the proceedure was repeated on the next article. Except where noted below, in a few articles, there was little or no comment, and no pros or cons recorded. Chapter 35, Section V (Page 16) - Use Regulations. Councillor Perron presented the hypothetical case where a visitor to a family arrived with a house trailer; told he could get a thirty (30) day parking permit. Chapter 35, Section V-B, Par. 4 (Page 25 ) R-3 Districts - new sub-item "e" Garden type (multi-family dwellings ) As expected(.there was considera- ble comment, and all of a nature which. indicated that the article was not clearly understood. As an explanation and summary, the chairman said that at present, a multi-family house over two stories high can be built using Type I (Rein- forced concrete ) or Type II (Structural Steel Frame ) construction. Under this article, Type VI (Wood Frame ) construction can be used providing guide lines specified are followed. Since Type VI construction is cheaper, it broadens the working tools and opportunities of the builder. • This article furthermore takes Garden Type Housing out of "Special Per- mit" area requiring Board of Appeal hearing, and places it under "permitted uses" where a builder deals directly with the Building Inspector. Councillor Perron asked why the larger lot area of 3000 square feet per dwelling unit was required for Garden Type, while 1000 square feet per unit was required for a high-rise dwelling; also, why more parking area. There were no contrary comments recorded, and it is assumed all were in favor. Chapter 35, Section VIIC (Page 38) Par. 6 - "Required Parking". A question was asked whether a built-in garage is considered a parking space. Answer - yes. Chapter 35, Section VII Par. E (Page 12) "Signs". An owner doing bus- iness at the corner of Webb and Fort Avenue under Board of Appeal permit, stated that he is restricted to a ridiculously small business sign. He was told that all signs have been placed under the Building Code, and that some of it has been rewritten. He may get some relief now. UNDER CHANGES ON ZONING MAP No. 3 - Ward 3 = Concerning changing some land off Highland Avenue from R-C to R-3 District : • Speaking "against", Mr. Mahoney said he is talking for the people in the area, and that he himself owns land there. He said, the people worked :r 4 - • hard to have it zoned R-C in the first place. It is essentially muddy land and drains hundreds of acres, including part of Highland Avenue. He said that the Audubon Society and the Department of Natural Resources are inter- ested in keeping it R-C. Mr. Jodin also placed his name in opposition. Speaking "for" was Dr. Pocharski, one of the owners. He disputed the statement that it was muddy land. In fact, he said, the city was consider- ing it as a school site. He spoke of development plans for the area which would benefit him and the city. However, he did riot make plain whether. these were firm plans or an artist 's conception. No. 4 Ward 5 - Concerning the changing of R-2 District between B-4 on each side on Canal Street, to B-4: Attorney Baker placed his name in favor. No. 6 - Ward 7 - Henceforth, refer to State Teachers College as State College at Salem. It was at the request of Dr. Meier who was not at the meeting. This completed the agenda. The hearing was declared over at 11 :05 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, Clerk • ° CtV of �$akrc, fflassarhusrtts T '^ '������' �Ittnntxrg nttr3 Cahn • (t$rup, fir. MINUTES OF MEETING - JUNE 15. 1967 (PerulD 8f. �Ic@turthg 'Michael Vashafuski 34 Qlllurrh Strret ,Albert fit_ Vifcaff 'Salem, Auss"rhusrtfs paumsub g. 'Sfuerneu Meeting was held at the Board's regular quarters, 34 Church Street, and was opened at 7 :30 P.M. by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. All members. were present at the meeting. The first order of business was a discussion on the proposed amendments to the Salem Subdivision Control Law. After careful attention to each item, Mr. Pitcoff moved that the specified amount of $4.00 per hour, page 3, paragraph 10, be changed to $6.00 per hour. Motion seconded, all in favor, and so moved. Mr. Pitcoff then moved that the Board adopt these amendments in the form presented, except as to the change mentioned above. Motion was seconded, all in favor and so voted approved. A motion was then made that a new set of subdivision regulations as now amended by the votes taken at this meeting be printed in order to have a • complete set to file with the City Clerk and the Registry of Deeds. This motion was seconded, and so voted, all in favor. The: next item before the Board was the matter of proposed amendments to the City Zoning Ordinance. As with the subdivision control amendments, each item was read and in all cases each member signified his approval. Mr. Sweeney moved that the Board recommend to the City Council the adop- tion of the proposals, as to which this Board held a public hearing on May 31, 1967, with the following additions and exceptions : The additions being three items changing the Zoning map; the exception being the rezon- ing of a parcel of land bounded by Highland Avenue, Willson Road, and Highland Park presently zoned as an R-C, (conservation area) to an R-3, (multi-family) zone, because of the lack of information as to the poten- tial use of this property if rezoned and the benefits to be derived from such rezoning. Motion seconded, all in favor and so voted. A Form A application of John Sosnowski, referring to a parcel of land on Lemon Street and Lemon Street Court was next presented to the Board. On motion made and seconded, it was voted to deny this application due to violation of the density regulations, and refer applicant to the Board of Appeals. This concluded the business brought to this meeting, and the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Uierk• m (fit#g n �ziezn, �ssttcl#ixsP##s Fla=ing nttr� John M. Gray, Jr. July 17, 1967 Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney MINUTES OF MEETING HELD - - - JULY 6 1967 s This meeting was held in the Mayor's office in City Hall and was opened by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , at 7 :00 P.M. In attendance in addition to the chairman were Michael Paskowski, Gerald McCarthy, and Albert Pit- coff. A form A application was presented by Demetra Zareas, 6 March Street . He proposed to divide a parcel of land at this location into two lots, A and B. On motion made and seconded it was voted approved. As lot "A" does not have sufficient area for a dwelling, the Board will notify the applicant he must seek approval of the Board of Appeal before construct- ing a dwelling on this lot. Naumkeag Amusement Company presented a form A for a redivision of land on Barton Square to be removed from a larger lot on Norman Street , Crom- bie Street and Barton Square. On motion of Mr. McCarthy, seconded by Mr. Pitcoff all voted in favor to endorse . • Attorney George P. Vallis , counsel for Salem Acres, Inc . , presented a Form B application for tentative approval of preliminary plan of land rear of Gallows Hill Road, Subdivision Witchcraft Heights. At this time the Board was requested to adjourn to the Council Chamber by President Louis Swiniuch of the City Council, as the Councillors were assembled . The Planning Board had been requested to meet with the Council at 7 :30 to discuss proposed amendments to the Subdivision Control Regula- tions, and the Zoning Ordinance . Immediately following the session with the City Council, the regular meeting was reopened in the Council Chamber to take up the unfinished portion of Counselor Vallis' business with the Board . First was the presentation of two letters for signing, one to F.H.A. and the other to V.A . They concerned Lot #5 on Wntchcraft Road in Subdivis- ion already approved. Letters state that the lot was released from pro- tective custody with a security agreement of $500.00. This is an arbitra- ry figure as both agencies want to see the language that some security was posted . Letters signed . Next Mr. Vallis presented an itemized breakdown totaling $5000.00 which he calculated as the amount of bond to be posted on unfinished portion of Subdivision Plan Witchcraft Heights. He was advised to submit the list to the City Engineer, Neal Mitchell for his review and comment . • ... ' `0' situ of '*Iem, 'fflttssar4usrtts �Ittzxntn� �uttr� John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy —2— CITY HALL r Michael Paikowski Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney Following Mr. Vallis request for release of $20,000. security on the com- pleted area of Gables Circle and Gallows Hill Road of Subdivision, Albert Pitcoff stated he would write in collaboration with George Vallis, an ap- propriate letter to Mr. Mitchell, and was authorized to sign for the Planning Board. Finally, Mr. Vallis presented for signing a duplicate copy of plan of Crescent Drive (already approved ) so that it could be recorded with the land Court . Endorsed . This concluded the business on hand and the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • } 'v � � CZt#� of �ttlEm, �tt�sttcl�u.�et#s • �; �(Mttltltt$ �iIItIYL� John M. Gray, Jr. MINUTES OF MEETING - - JULY 20. 1967 Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Albert R. Pitcoff Raymond F. Sweeney ` The meeting was declared open at 7 :30 P.M. by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , with members Raymond Sweeney, Albert Pitcoff, and Michael Paskowski also in attendance. In the first order of business, Building Inspector Daniel OtBrien, Jr. , asked clarification of a case concerning two adjacent and registered non- conforming lots of fifty-foot frontage each on Clark Street. After bog- ging down in legal interpretations for about twenty minutes, our legal member Attorney Albert Pitcoff suggested that the owner hire a lawyer to research this case and show Mr. O'Brien why a building permit should be issued. Next was a Form "A11 application of Lillian A. Francoeur, 24 ,Osborne Street, Salem concerning registered lots 10$ and 109 on Belleview Street of sepa- rate ownership. Each lot is 251 x 1001 , and even if combined would be ten feet short in frontage. However, under certain conditions, this combination could be approved. Like the preceeding case, it was involved in legal • interpretation with insufficient history available to reach a final decis- ion. Hence, this application was denied without pre.Judice, and the appli- cant was invited to reapply and appear in person at the meeting with more information, particularly when she got possession of the land. The third order of business was a letter from Neal Mitchell inquiring about the status of Mr. Matton's business with this Board. On May 22, 1967, we received plans from Mr. Matton containing profiles of Day Avenue for water and sewer extension. At that time, a letter was dictated to Neal Mitchell asking for his review and comments. His reply is now on file. It was voted to send back these plans to Mr. Matton, together with a copy of Neal Mitch- ell 's reply, and a request that petitioner's engineer get in touch with the City Engineer so that his suggestions could be incorporated into plans. The fourth order of business concerned a letter from George Vallis requesting release of $20,000. performance security on Witchcraft Heights. This letter 'was received at the previous meeting and a routine letter was dictated to the City Engineer. Mr. Mitchell 's preliminary report to Mr. Gray contained numerous deviations from the approved plans of such magnitude as to prompt Mr. Gray to personally visit the area and confirm the charges. As a result, Mr. Gray called an On-Site joint meeting for 4:00 P.M. July 27, including the Planning Board, City Engineer, Mr. Vallis and Mr. Carter, counselor and architect respectively for developer, Salem Acres, Inc. , Next, the chairman read a letter which he wrote to the Councillors as a result of the session with them. It contained a new amendment under "Trail- ers" (7 ) and in part read that - - - 11 a trailer not over 25 feet long and registered to owner of building can be stored by permit of Building Inspec- tor". 2 The Chairman read a second letter which he had written to the National Swimming Pool Institute in Washington, D.C. , after reading an article on swimming pools in the Herald-Traveler. The primary purpose was to gather useful information for writing up an Ordinance. Finally, the Chairman read still another letter which he had written to the Founcillors regarding yearly review of Ordinances for the Workable Program. Meeting adjourned at 9 :10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • • 0-13tv of J$ale ' Aass r4usrtts �s���. �Itt�ning �attr� August 14, 1967 John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy MINUTES OF MEETING - - AUGUST 3 . 1967 CITY HALL Michael Paskowski Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond E. Sweeney Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , opened the meeting at 7:30 P.M. with Mr. Pas- kowski, Mr. Pitcoff, and Mr. McCarthy in attendance. Mr. Paskowski moved to dispense with reading the minutes of the last meet- ing, and the motion was seconded by Mr. Pitcoff, all in favor and so approved. The Naumkeag Amusement Company, 150 Washington Street, presented a form A application concerning land at the corner of Norman and Crombie Streets. Applicant intends to convey part of this property to another, with each parcel having sufficient frontage. On motion made and seconded, it was voted to endorse this plan. An application and plan for endorsement were next presented by Counselor George Vallis for Henry Boucher, 11 Fairfield Street . Plan showed land on Adams Street at the corner of Madison Street, formerly lots 1, 2, 31 and 4, to become lots "A" and "B". Board voted to endorse this plan. A plan showing a parcel of undeveloped land containing 81.0 acres, sit- uated on and off the northwesterly side of Loring Avenue, together with a Form A application was presented by Raymond L. Cummings of Loring Real- ty Trust . Mr. McCarthy moved-,that the plan be endorsed, Mr. Paskowski seconded the motion. Mr. Pitcoff refrained from voting in this case. All others in favor, and so voted to endorse. A letter from Mayor Francis X. Collins was read regarding the Workable Program. The Board has the Planning Services Group working on this, and a representative of this company is interviewing department heads. Mr. Gray reported on an inspection at Witchcraft Heights made by the City Engineer with another man from his department, Counselor Vallis for the developer, Architect Joseph Ca 'r'ter of Carter and Towers, and Board members Mr. Paskowski, Mr. Pitcoff, and Mr. Gray. The purpose of the visit was to inspect site conditions where certain deficiencies in workmanship were ob- served, also street lines do not agree with the: measurements. It was felt that most of the deficiencies insofar as workmanship is concerned, could be corrected. In the case of bituminous sidewalks encroaching on property lines, it was felt they could not be cut back to the property lines. However in other inspections where areas are six inches to one and one-half feet too wide, at the present time the engineer could not ascertain what he would do. It was finally left that Mr. Carter would run specifications • - 2 Woon all questionable areas which would take two weeks, after which he can have the city engineer and the Planning Board view the specifications, and decide what to do about the rise in the laying out of the streets. Francis B. Gerry, 10 Chestnut Street, Peabody, appeared for Elwin E. and Evelyn M. Rebidue with a Form A application for endorsement of a plan show- ing a small area of 1394 square feet to be conveyed to his clients by owners of Lot #618 Appleby Road, and become part of their land at #621 Appleby Road. Each lot would have sufficient frontage, and it was voted to endorse this plan. Attorney Samuel Zoll, representing Anastasia Kozicki, Frances Schevis and Stephen Schevis, presented a plan for endorsementp together with a Form A application, concerning two lots of land; Lot one containing 10930 square feet of land on Larch Avenue, and Lot 2 containing 16597 square feet of land located at 65 Dearborn Street. It was also voted to endorse this plan as each lot would have sufficient frontage. Representing Salem Acres, Inc., Counselor George Vallis sought release of Lots #147 and #148 on Crescent Drive so developer may sell. Developer will post security bond for all lots in this area, Witchcraft Road, Crescent Drive, and Summit Street. Motion was made and seconded to release these two lots from the protective covenant of May 19, 1967, all in favor, and so voted. Chairman John M. Gray signed the release. The Chairman reported that the DiBiase Trust intends to build an apartment house complex on 4and on Highland Avenue and Proctor Street, and has hired &- registered arciitect to lay out the plan. Carter and Tower will do the oad work. The architect presented a set of plans to Mr. O'Brien, the In- spector of Buildings, who in turn brought these to Mr. Gray's attention. Several items need correction on the plans. The architect and counsel for the developer, together with the Building Inspector will meet with Mr. Gray to iron out these difficulties. Mr. Gray reported he had been in touch with the Swimming Pool Institute, and they have a proposed code to recommend for local facilities which will be ready in October or November of this year. Several items in it need more looking into, particularly on construction. All Business before the Board having been attended to, it was voted to ad- journ at 9 :40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, e Clerk t0Na[ , m 'U'Lli#u of '$ttXem, 'Mttssar4use##s S�C(.1�.E Aµ4N4L4lLF µ ,4p UN4� John M. Gray, Jr. NN /✓ August 25, 1967 Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Albert R. F.Sweeney Raymond F. Sweeney MINUTES OF MEETING - AUGUST 17. 1967 As there was an insufficient number of members present to provide a quorum, this meeting was postponed until the next regularly sched- uled meeting to be held on September 7. Respectfully submitted, -' Jerk n ,! ,caws y ( itu of Salem, 'Maxssa rhusetts A4�A ` aurbi Jahn �. Grag, ar. NN VVV September 15, 1967 Geralh X. Ar@Iarthg Aiirllael Faskafuski CHH Pull Albert X.'Pitraff MINUTES OF MEETING - - - SEPTEMBER 7. 1967 Salem, Massachusetts paumanD X 'Sfaeeneu On September 7, the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board was held with Chairman John Gray, and Members Alfred Pitcoff and Gerald McCarthy in at- tendance. The meeting was opened at 7 :30 P-M- The first item on the agenda was a Form A application of Roland L'Heureux, concerning a plan showing land at the corner of Walter and Dearborn Streets. The Board voted to allow the applicant leave to withdraw without prejudice. James Grasso next submitted a Form A application and plan of land on Marl- borough Road, lacking sufficient information for endorsement. The Board voted to deny this application. Counselor George Vallis, representing Di'Biase Realty Trust, presented an Agreement for signature by the Planning Board previously signed by his client. This is with reference to the Planning Board's advising the Inspec- tor of Buildings that it has no objection to his issuing a permit for the erection of one multi-family dwelling as shown on an attached plan of land off Highland Avenue. The agreement further states the developer agrees to submit to the Board a definitive plan of a subdivision for approval; also, the developer further covenants and agrees he will not seek building per- mits, nor commence construction of other buildings until final approval of the definitive plan is granted by the Planning Board, and finally, the developer agrees to grant to the City of Salem a twenty-four (24) foot easement adjacent to Building #1 and #2. It was voted to notify the Inspector of Buildings that the Board has no objection to his issuing a permit to the DiBiase Realty Trust to erect a multi family dwelling as shown on the plan submitted. With regard to a subdivision plan of Salem Acres, Inc., "Witchcraft Heights III", the Board voted to postpone the regularly scheduled meeting on the first Thursday in October to Wednesday, October ll, ;to enable the developer to appear at a public hearing which will precede the regular meeting on that date. Notices are to be published in The Evening News on the 22nd and the 29th to this effect. The Board voted to communicate with the City Eng- ineer requesting his comments on this plan. The Board voted also to ask Mr. Mitchell to advise as to the estimated cost of work to be completed on Crescent Drive, in:. the Witchcraft Heights development. f 2 • Copies of the new Subdivision Control Regulations were received from the printers, and one will be forwarded to the City Clerk for his records. A letter to the City Clerk requesting his certification of another copy to be transmitted to the Registry of Deeds will be forwarded. Other copies will be forwarded to the Mass. Dept. of Commerce and Development, and one each to certain municipal department heads. A letter from the City, Engineer, concerning a plan of land on Horton Street was read, and it was voted to submit a copy to Counselor John Serafini who represents the owner, Ida Talbot, requesting that the owner's engineer make corrections as indicated, and then submit the preliminary plan to this Board. Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , suggested that the Board write to the Board of Appeal opposing an application of Dr. Richard McKeage, to occupy the prem- ises at 114-116 Highland Avenue as a medical office building, stating that the petition should be filed requesting a special permit and not a variance. It was voted to forward such a letter to the Board of Appeal. This was the final business of this meeting and it was voted to adjourn at 10:20 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, I �,, 0 (►cif of �ttlezn tts��scl�u�E�#s rT',<.cr ���2IkIkTIYC� �OtiY1� v rn� John M. Gray, Jr. September 25, 1967 _ Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Albert R. Pitcoff - Raymond F. Sweeney Honorable Francis X. Collins, City Halli Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mayor Collins: At a regular meeting of the Planning Board on Thursday, September 21, 196'7, certain items pertaining to the "Workable Program" of the City were discussed. Afterward,the Board voted to make the following recommendations to you. Enclosed herewith are copies of letters from the Planning Services Group, our Planning Consultants , and a sample application form for "Lo- cal Planning Assistance Program" , issued by the Department of Commerce and Development of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Planning Board feels that these enclosures are self-explanatory. • 1. The City of Salem appropriate $33,000.00 to spread over three fis- cal years, $11,000.00 each year for 1967, 1969, and 1970) , as its share for funds under Section 701 of the Urban Planning Assistance Program. Under this program, a new Comprehensive Plan can be made to supplement the existing plan that is now almost five years old. 2. The City create a new position of a full time Coordinator of Fed- eral Programs . We would emphasize that this position would stress ad- ministration and not planning. The Coordinator could work directly under the Mayor or the Planning Board. 3. The City NOT consider a Planning Department as the Board feels it would be a financial burden to the Cityj and there is no evidence to date that qualified persons could be found to staff the positions. 4. The City, under the Planning Board, use a consultant for such plan - ning. The Planning Board recommends that immediate consideration be given to the above recommendations so that the renewal of the "Workable Pro- gram" certificate may not be held up. Very truly yours, JMG: cc JOH GRAY, JR. , hairman Ixero l;cGuz Xrr'01 ll0I-y ' • f:C f Yll rh�.� Lt�t 'y':� L f % S i V 5 +�I�:., at' 18 Eliot Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 UNiversity 8.7300 September 20, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Chairman Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: I am writing this letter at your request to furnish you with information essential to a decision by the Planning Board, the Mayor and the City Council to undertake the preparation of a new Comprehensive Plan for Salem. Salem needs a new Comprehensive Plan. The earliest reports of the present Plan date from early 1962. The Plan itself is dated November 1963. HUD requires that a comprehensive plan be re- viewed continuously so that it is at all times current and pertinent; ';. in addition, it should be thoroughly revised at least every five years. In Salem's case there has been, to my knowledge, no periodic revision of the 1963 Comprehensive Plan and by next year HUD will consider it out of date even if that procedure had been followed. By the time a new Plan can be completed, the present one will be at least eight years old. If Salem requests Federal assistance under the 701 Program, which is explained below, there will be a consider- able delay before the preparation of a new Plan can start. . We under- stand that 701 funds for the present Federal fiscal year, (which in fact have not yet been appropriated) are entirely spoken for by ap- plications now officially pending with HUD. Consequently, even if Salem should apply for the 701 Program within the very near future, it is likely to be a year from now before planning can actually start. It is, unfortunately, one of the regulations of the 701 Program that its funds cannot be applied retroactively. A final consideration in this timetable is that the planning period will undoubtedly require part of 1968, all of 1969 and 1970 and very likely part of 1971. The Urban Planning Assistance Program, (commonly called "Section 701" because of its designation in the U. S. Housing Act) provides a city of less than 50, 000 population with a federal grant of two-thirds of the total cost of a planning program. Application is made by the Planning Board to the Massachusetts Department of Commerce and "%rr-1 fxr'no . xrno Mr. John M. Gray -2- September 20, 1967 • Development (DCD). The application form, a copy of which is en- closed, itself is relatively simple to prepare, once the Planning ; Board and its consultant have agreed upon a detailed scope of ser- vices and an appropriate fee. The DCD recommends that one of its representatives discuss the 701 Program with any Planning Board contemplating using it. We recommend that you do this at an early date. The application to DCD must be accompanied by evidence that the I City has committed itself to the program by appropriating all or a significant portion of its share of total cost. There is a more detailed j discussion of this point later in this letter. The application, when approved by DCD, is forwarded to HUD, Region I, in New York for j its review. Through correspondence and conferences, agreement is reached between all parties concerned as to the scope of work to be performed once Federal funds are allocated. During the contract period, DCD exercises a supervisory function, by virtue of the fact that DCD contracts with the consultant and it also contracts with the community; but there is no direct contractual arrangement between the consultant and the community. The only participation by HUD i during the contract period is a quantitative audit of the contract upon its completion. I. Due to the great demand for 701 funds, in relation to their relatively short supply, all states and HUD have set up criteria by which to de- termine priorities for the allocation of available funds. We under- stand that DCD places a great deal of emphasis upon the date of re- ceipt of an acceptable application, while determining such other 1 criteria as past performance, relation to regional planning, the urgency of need (that is, whether a Comprehensive Plan is needed as a prerequisite to other Federal programs such as urban renewal), and the extent to which planning, as a continuous governmental func- tion, is accepted within the community. f HUD has recently issued a new regulation for the 701 Program re- quiring that a community with a population of 25, 000 or more must ., ! have the equivalent of a full-time director with responsibility for its ! continuing planning program. It is my understanding that Salem is considering the creation of a new position in the City government, that of Coordinator of Federal Programs. It is my opinion that the person filling this position could also satisfy the above requirement for the 701 Program. Another decision which the City faces is whether its planning pro- gram will be undertaken by staff entirely, or by a consultant entirely, or by a combination of the two. An extensive and experienced staff is required to prepare a comprehensive plan for a city as large and as complex as Salem. It is a universal experience among commun- rr�1 j xreo 1. xcrio l ��>�; urr �n•r l Mr. John M. Gray -3- September 20, 1967 ities with planning staffs that such personnel are called upon to do many other jobs for the City and consequently cannot devote full c time to the preparation of a comprehensive plan. An adequate staff to prepare a comprehensive plan for Salem would, in my opinion, consist of the following minimum without allowance for diversion of time to other assignments: a Planning Director whose salary should be about $15, 000 per year; a draftsman-delineator whose salary would be about $10, 000 per year; a secretary at approximately $5, 000 per year; and two assistants to the Planning Director, one of whom should be a Junior Planner and the other, a Research Assistant but not necessarily in the field of planning. I estimate the cost of such a staff to be about $50, 000 per year. It is possible with this arrange- ment to obtain 701 funds and to offset the City's one-third share by services, for which the City will have already paid in the form of salaries. Although a staff of this size is needed to prepare the Comprehensive Plan, it is not needed for the annual maintenance of the plan or for routine assignments once the plan is prepared. i It would then be possible for the City to cut back the size of the staff. As an alternative, the City may use a consultant who will have the staff necessary to prepare the Plan and can devote all the time ne- cessary to it. It is also possible for a consultant to assign a resi- dent planner to Salem whose salary could be paid for by the City and - ; which could then be used as an offset against the City's share of a j 701 Program. Such an arrangement would, in effect, be equivalent j to using both staff and consultant. It has the virtue, moreover, of a single direction of the planning program rather than a split func- tion which would be the case if there were to be an independent staff. This type of arrangement has been used for some years by Brook- line and Somerville. I i Should Salem elect to work with a consultant, a selection should be made at an early date so that the consultant can then prepare a de- tailed work program and fee. In this way the Planning Board and I � the City will know what is to be done and the size of federal grant to apply for. As a rough estimate, and using other communities for comparability, it is my opinion that a planning program for Salem would require a fee of approximately $100, 000. Salem's j share would be one-third, or $33, 000, which could be spread over three fiscal years, 1967, 1969, and 1970. The reason for the gap is that the application requires a financial commitment by the City, as I discussed previously. I have assumed that one-third of the -i City's share will be acceptable as a commitment for the Application. However, although this money must be appropriated in 1967, it I. need not be expended (that is, turned over to the State) until 1968. Mr. John M. Gray -4- September 20, 1967 '• On the assumption, also as stated above, that no allocation of Federal funds will be made until next fall, then in 1969 and 1970 additional appropriations and expenditures will be required, one-third of the City's share in each year. As I have said, these arrangements should be discussed with DCD. In summary, the following policy determinations and actions are necessary: 1. A decision whether to undertake the preparation of a new Comprehensive Plan. i 2. A decision whether the necessary professional services should be provided by local staff, or by a consultant or a combination. ! 3. A decision whether to apply for 701 funds, regardless of which choice is made in determination # 2. 4. Application filed with the Department of Commerce and De- velopment as soon as possible. Sincerely yours, / /-6 L1 1 on I�. / B Pa I MBB:ml l i i i . � I 1 r i j j • i xrno' `r .n APPLICATION • LOCAL PLA4NING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Title VII - HOUSING ACT OP 1954 Massachusetts Department of Revised June,1966 Commerce FROVI: and The Planning Board of Development Community Name r Prepared by: Name Title . i Address { Telephone No. i NOTE: 1. This application will not be reviewed by the Department unless it is accompanied by a letter from the chairman of the Planning Board, a copy of the proposed program and Tabular Summary recommended by the proposed consultant, and an affidavit from the City or Tour Treasurer stating that the municipalities' financial share of the proposed program is available. 2. The enclosed budget will establish the maximum amount of funds available under a contract to be signed by :the Department and your Board. If your community ,rill not appropriate the full amount a contract may be negotiated for a lesser amount. This application does not bind your community or your Board in any way. Approved by Planning Board Date Chairman 'Proposed Consultant Secretary Name oiavr 'I :ovr� I• I. PAST PLA i7I'1iG PROGR.u7S: Description o the elements- of the Overall Planning Program completed for the Town to date is attached as Item A to this application including implementation of recommendations by the • Town or City. SX..IPLE: A description of the activities of the Overall Planning Program completed to date is as follows: ITEM ORIGr.7AL LATEST DATE REVISION CONSULTANTS 111PLEIMNTED OF STUDY DATE IF ANY PHASES A. Subdivision Regs. J B. Zoning By—Law 9. Base Map D. Building Code E. Master Plan ---••----------------------------- Breakdown of F. elements of G. plan that have H. bebnr.implemeated r I. J. II. PRESENTLY PROPOSED PLANNING PROGPXA: The description of the activities of the Overall Planning Program . proposed under this contract is to be known as the "Scope of Services" and is attached as Item B to this application. III. FUTURE CONTE1 iPLATED PLANNING rROG7FUU4: The following is a listing of planning work contemplated subsequent • to the completion of the presently proposed work program. I IV. PLANNING BUDGET FOR LAST FIVE YEARS: ANNUAL BUDGET SPECIAL APPROPIIATIONS FOR STUDIES,IF ANY 196 196 $ u 196 a 196 3 196 (Current) V. URBAN RENEWAL ACTIVITIES: A. Do you have any bad or substandard housing problems? Yes No Be Has any work been done on an Urban Renewal program? Yes No Iden#fy and describe the nature of any Federally assisted urban renewal activities that are currently in progress or that are contemplated by the municipality,e.g„Title I Project,Community Renewal Program,General Neighborhood Renewal Plan,Demonstration (Section,702 Public Works Planning), C. Identify and describe the nature of any planning activities related to the physical planning of the assisted municipality that have been or are being financed or for which financing • is anticipated by Federal grants from other Federal Agencies or programs,e.g.,Bureau of Public Roads( 1,2%Highway Planning Funds), Community Facilities Administration(Section 702 Public Works Planning). �RF_FO %CRO -2- MICRO +%O w • VI. PROPOSED PROGRAM ( check in the appropriate column) ITh.^'.'! C NEW STUDY; REVISION', i?TTMR IN COlTSULTANT WILL PREPARE': I of ORDER OF STUDY &� STUDY & MAPS LiT I ( EXISTd ;C'ORTAFORMAL 1 RP20RT FOR' I STUDY REPORT 1BOARD USE ' 1. Inventory Surveys a. Maps I 1 b. Land Use c. Population d. Delineation of Neighborhoods j e. Economic Base f. Other t 2. Community Facilities j Studies and Plan I a. Schools b. Recreation c. Other Public land and buildings I I 11 3. Circulation studies I I1 j and Plan a. Streets and Highways I b. Off-Street parldng 4. Utility studies and Plan a. Water , b. Sewerage I j c. Drainage I I I 5. Area of Influence ( ! 1 Study a survey and report or part of a report I on planning and dev- elopment problems and, conditions in the i surrounding and adjacent area that might affect the program of the municipality. 1 6. Future Land Use I • _ Ixrro xrrio xisnoj x��of ronr.0 4 ITIM C i N W UVISION'1+U.)MER IN i CMSULTANT WILL PREPARE: • STUDY j of {ORDER OF STUDY A STUDY &j HAPS 'Y.ISTING' Lj2CRT.10,70ji FORMAL IMPM T t STUDY i REPORT) FOR � . BOARD. USE { (7. Effectuation j t I Programs a. Zoning By-Law I b. Subdivision I Replations I c. Official Map d. Capital Budget S. _S_pecial Projects a. Economic Dev- elopmentProgram ` b. neighborhood j Analysis i 1 . Delineation of !!! I neighborhood i areas and boundaries t 2. Information on j housing conditions including location and extent of blight � or potential blight i 3. Characteristics families affected I • by poor housing. 4. Information on conditions in t non-residential I j areas including j location and extent of blight t I j or potential I blight 5. Adequacy of Coma- I• unity facilities and services,both public and private. ! 6. Causes of blight 7. Identification and priority of steps needed to eliminate present blight and � prevent future blight New programs of the Housing and Urban I Development Act of 1965 including the Open Space Land I Program, Urban j Beautification Pro- j J gram,Code Enforeement Program and Demolition Grant Program in addition?I to other federal and state i Programs shall be considered. j Irtur'r nor • ITEM C j NF7 i REVISION ' NTIMR TST COITSTTYT.. :'T 17I!L PREPARE: iSTUDY! of 0„ ER OF STUDY & STUDY & . ; MAPS I i EXIS,12.T.7 ' L.TPOITArrm FOR'iAL REPORT FOR'i I STUDY RLOTORT i BOLD) IISL o. Other: ! ! Studies pertaining + to a planning pro— gram of a specialized nature that would included within a li total program accord= ! ! ing to the nature off ! f the comrunity involved. 1 i 1 9. Master Plan Report ! ! I VII. PROPOSED BUDGET: A. Estimated time for this project 6 12 18 24 ('.'aximum) 71onths (please circle one) NOTE: This time will not start until federal approval. is obtained and contracts are executed B. Does community employ any personnel who is qualified to work on this program? _ _yes no Title of position • C. Budget: 1. Salaries and Cages (a) Local technical personnel 13 _ 2. Contract Services (a) Contracts for professional services 3. Other expenses (a) Reproduction and publication of essential reports and documents 3 _ (b) 4. Total estimated cost of project: ,3 i Costs for office space, equipment, materials,suppliss, utilities, communications and other costs of a regular and continuing nature are not allowable. 5. Amount of federal grant requested (Max. o project cost) VIII. ANY PERTIJENT INFOW,7ATION ON THIS .PROGN:1 NOT REQUEF7)! ' FY THIS FORM. • —5— % o ..� .-�—...__�--_._ %I'RO .. __. _ '-•--•...-.- .. ..._ � %SAO "' � t#v ofttlem, ttssttt �tse#t� m�c� ��2I1tYCLkI$ �IIMT�1 September 29 , 1967 John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy MINUTES OF MEETING - - SEPTEMBER 21 . 1967 CITY HALL Michael Paskowski - Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney With members t4jcha@l, Paskowski and Albert Pitcoff attending, Acting Chairman Gerald T. McCarthy opened the meeting at 7: 30 P.M. Copies of minutes of previous meeting had been distributed tb. all members prior to this meeting, and it was voted, all in favor to accept same . Counselor Timothy O 'Keefe presented a Form Aapplication for endorse- ment for the applicants Donald and Dorothy Ronan, concerning a trian- gular piece of land 1441 square feet in area, abutting the turn-around at the end of Witchcraft Road, with access through lot owned by appli- cants to Wall Street Court . On motion made and seconded, it was voted to endorse this plan. The second Form A application was presented by Attorney Charles Manning for Mabel Drolet , 86 Federal Street . The reason for the endorsement being to divide a parcel into lots 1 and 2, motion made and seconded, and so moved all in favor voted to endorse . • Another Form A submitted, showed a plan of land of Audet on Salem and Palmer Streets through Counselor George Ankeles with adequate frontage on both streets . The only purpose of the plan is to show existing structures on the land which has been owned by present owners and their family since 1920 . Motion made by Mr. Paskowski to endorse , seconded by Mr. Pitcoff, all in favor, so moved. Voted to endorse . The fourth Form A application showed land owned by the Boston and Maine Railroad, fronting on Ocean Avenue , to be conveyed to Stephen and Dor- othy Rizzotti, abutters ; it was voted, all in favor, to endorse plan. George Vallis , Counsel for DiBiase Realty Trust , filed a plan with the Board, requesting copy be submitted to the City Engineer. Mr. Pitcoff made a motion in connection with this subdivision plan, "Heritage Heights" showing lots of land on Hilltop Drive adjacent to Highland Avenue , Hill- side Avenue and Proctor Street , that this Board hold a public hearing on November 2 , 1967 at 8:00 P.M. , seconded by Mr. Paskowski, all in favor, and so voted. The Board will notify the City Engineer of the hearing and request his comments on the plan. Mr. Pitcoff stated as a matter of record, that the subdivision regula- tions which this Board revised as of June- 15, 1967, and adopted on that date , have now been recorded with the Registry of Deeds . A copy was filed with the City Clerk previously. .1 • 2 A communication from Mr. Robert Donovan, 23 Gallows Hill Road, was read, referring to a water run-off problem in the Witchcraft Heights develop- ment . A reply will be sent to Mr. Donovan, and a copy of his letter is to be forwarded to the developer, requesting that he take this matter up with the writer of the letter. The Board discussed the possibility of meeting with the Board of Appeal members to go over problems of mutual interest to both boards , and to the City Building Department . It was decided to write to each member of the Appeals Board and to the Building Inspector, requesting their presence as guests of this Board some convenient evening at the Hawthorne Hotel . Mr. Pitcoff made a motion that this Board approve a Capital Improvements Program as a continuing guide for Capital Improvements for the City of Salem. Seconded by Mr. Paskowski, all in favor, and so voted. A letter from our Consultants, the Planning Services Group, was next pre- sented to the meeting. The letter was dated September 20, 1967 , and furnished the Board with detailed information regarding a new Comprehen- sive Plan, also acquainting the Board with the Federal assistance avail- able under the 701 program, in connection with which Federal funds might • be made available to the extent of 2/3 of the total cost involved in a planning program for the City of Salem. On motion made and seconded, it was unanimously voted to send to the Mayor a letter making recommendations in connection with the Planning Assistance Program, a copy of which is attached to the records of this meeting. Meeting adjourned at 10: 20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • L Ctg of 'S' ttlm, tt�stttlt setts •� �Rf'Cp@•E AVCiq AA�4L .Lp�tiL� @von 0. Drag, @r. »1 4 Gernlb T. Ar&trt4Q MINUTESuOF BOARD MEETING HELD OCTOBER 11, 1967 , lichnel nskafnski 8g �$ttll �16exf iR_ �iicaff �ttlem, ,lAl[ttssttclTnsefts �Rttgmanil �_ �fneeneg With Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , presiding, the meeting was opened at 7:30 P.M. In attendance were Members Michael Paskowski, Albert Pitcoff, and Gerald McCarthy. The reading of the minutes of the previous meeting was dispensed, and on motion made and seconded these were voted approved and accepted. James Grasso of 14 Myles Road, Peabody, submitted a Form A with a plan show- ing two lots of land on Marlborough Road; one lot contains 16,300 square feet of land fronting on Marlborough Road, the second lot shows an area of 7000 s uare feet with frontage on Marlborough Road through through adjoining lot # 9 to which it is attached under one ownership. Motion was made and sec- onded, all in favor, plan voted approved. A form A and plan showing land with a three family house and a six room cot- tage thereon was next submitted by Elmer H. Warner of 10 Salt Wall Lane in Salem. The two houses have existed on this lot, 144 North Street for thirty years or more, and the purpose of the plan is to sell the house in the rear. On motion made and seconded, all in favor it was voted to endorse this plan, advising applicant that the division of this lot might create violations as to which it would be necessary for him to go to the Board of Appeal. Counsellor William Mahoney submitted a Form A. accompanied by a plan of land on Hillside Avenue, owned by Jane Nolan of 2 Chapel Road, Danvers. This plan shows two lots of registered land,#22A and #22B Hillside Avenue. On motion made and seconded, all in favor, it was voted to endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the subdivision control regulations. A Form A and plan of land showing lots 7: and 130 Witchcraft Road, owned by Salem Acres, Inc. , 71 Hancock Street, Everett was submitted by Counsellor George F. Vallis for endorsement as not requiring approval under the sub- division control law. The plan shows rearrangement of the division line between these lots. On motion made and seconded, all in favor, it was voted to endorse this plan. Mr. Narcisse Talbot appeared with a plan previously submitted to the Board showing land on Horton Road. Counsellor George Vallis appearing for Coun- sellor John Serafini in the interest of the owner, Ida M. Talbot, request- ed leave to withdraw without prejudice. On motion made and seconded, it was voted, all in favor to grant petitioner leave to withdraw without • prejudice. Health Board Member William Mahoney stated the Board of Health has been criticized on Planning Board approval of utilities and other matters, and • 2 that the Board of Health is going to suggest that the Planning Board have a member of the Board of Health attend all its meetings in the future. Mr. Albert Pitcoff stated a member will be welcome to be present at the Planning Board.s meetings if they wish to attend. PUBLIC HEARING : After the above mentioned business had been attended to, a public hearing, previously scheduled for this evening, was held on a Defini- tive Plan of Witchcraft Heights III, located off Gallows Hill Road and Rock- dale Avenue. Chairman John Gray read the advertisement as it had appeared in the Evening News, advising of this hearing. Counsellor Vallis, represent- ing the developer of Witchcraft Heights, presented a list of abutters and receipts showing registered mail had been received by these abutters. A no- tice received from the City Clerk stating he had received notification of a public hearing to be held before this Board on October 11, 1967, at $:00 P.M. relative to final approval of a subdivision to be known as Witchcraft Heights III, was read. Attorney William Mahoney appeared as a member of the Board of Health. Chair- man Gray questioned the Counsellor and Architect of the developer on this plan. Counsellor Vallis stated on behalf of his client, he will waive the sixty day statutory period requirement under Chapter 40A. The Board voted to request that the Board of Health and the City Engineer convene with the Planning Board at Se meeting of November 2 to study the engineering aspects of this plan. This concluded the public hearing. The Board then resumed its business presented for the regular meeting. A Mr. Richard Vanville was present. He resides at 81 Valley Street and requested that the Board read a letter which he had previously sent to the Board# in which he refers to "An open drainage ditch dug by the developer". The letter was read by Chairman Gray, who then stated that officially the Board can do nothing but refer the matter to the developer. Mr. Pitcoff wanted it record- ed that although the Board has no legal rights here, he intends to go to this location to look over the situation. The trouble area, affecting five or six homes in the development, is shown on the original plan of the subdivision as an open swale:, in existence for many many years. Mr. Vallis, representing his client, Salem Acres, Inc. , in the matter of a water run-off problem at Witchcraft Heights, previously complained of by Mr Robert Donovan of 23 Gallows Hill Road, stated the catch basin condition has been corrected. The Board felt that releases will have to be obtained from lot owners where street lines are not in conformity with the plans of the roads. Eventually the City will take over these streets. Mr. Carter, engin- eer for the developer, stated the stakes marking off boundary lines, are re- moved as fast as they can be put down. In a letter from Mr. Vallis about these same complaints, he explained he had discussed these matters with his client the developer and his engineer and was assured that the conditions de- ribed in Mr. Donovan's letter have been corrected; and further, his client ends to install a catch basin in the Valley Street Gallows Hill Road area in the very near future to alleviate the condition Mr. Donovan complained of. • - 3 - Another letter from Counsellor Vallis for his client, Salem Acres, Inc., de- veloper of the Witchcraft Heights area, was presented at this meeting. This was in regard to fire alarm systems in the development. Counsellor Vallis explained he had met with the City Electrician and the Chief of the Fire de- partment, and produced a plan showing places of installation of fire alarm bo)(es. The City Electrician said it would probably take four months to get the necessary materials. He further stated that Civil Defense and Police signal systems will also be installed. Mr. Vallis then brought up the matter of a $1,650. security bond for the re- lease of-lots of land shown on plan entitled Witchcraft Heights II, the Cres- cent Drive area. The Board suggested the developer complete the work to eliminate release of lots piecemeal. Aletter from the Board of Health with regard to a plan showing a develop- ment evelo -ment proposed on Hillside Avenue, Proctor Street, and Highland Avenue, known as Heritage Heights, was received. A public hearing with regard to this de- velopment will be scheduled at a future date. This concluded the business for the evening, and it was voted to adjourn at 10 :20 P.M. • Respectfully submitted, • Ctv of ,SUtem, Aassar4usetts a • 9T�kf'CpaNp, ��ttltklttt� �Rttr� @ahn M. (Brag, @r. RECORD OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1967 (Berala T. Ac(IIarthg ,fflicharl Faskafuski THU Xnll ,Albert �R. Vitrsff alem, 0860achusetts �Ragmaab A. j5fbeeneg The second regular meeting of the month was opened for business by Chair- man John M. Gray, Jr. , at 7: 30 P.M. All members were in attendance . There were no visitors at the start , nor did any come in during the session. " The first item was a letter from Richard Banville of Valley Street , con- cerning a "natural" drainage ditch in the rear of his own and his neigh- bors ' houses. It complained that the ditch was a hazard to children and that the developer welched on his promise to replace it with pipe. This was the second letter on the subject from the same writer. The first was read at the previous meeting which was also a public hearing, and which Mr. Banville was in attendance and also spoke. The chairman stated he would write an appropriate letter as a reply. Next was a letter from the City Engineer, Neal Mitchell, in the form of a reply to our request for his comments on Definitive Plan "Heritage • Heights" . Numerous deviations and deficiencies in utilities and street layouts were itemized. Mr. Pitcoff said he would put it through his office copier and deliver it to Attorney for the Developer, George Vallis. This concluded the business on hand, and the meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M. The members however, remained in the office for another forty minutes carrying on conversation on subjects of mutual interest . Respectfully submitted, L---/Mi6kael Pas owslFi, Clerk • I� fit of Salem, assarhusetts • 9��Af'CIMCIg AM�NFFL4.i M� �li��� t�¢011tt �opn�. vUTa�, JC. NNN V V9eZ8I� V1. �CQIaTYIt� 'Michael Vashvfashi MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING - 11 . 2 . 67 (Eitu Pall Albert P. Ilitcvff Aalem, Aassacilnsetts �Ragmvnb A. A'fveeneg With Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , presiding, and Board Members Michael Paskowski , Gerald McCarthy, and Albert Pitcoff in attendance , the meet- ing was opened at 7 : 30 P.M. Minutes of previous meeting having been forwarded to all members , read- ing of same was dispensed with, and on motion made and seconded, were voted approved and so accepted. A letter to Mr. Banville in reply, to a letter from him received by the City Engineer was read. This concerned a protest Mr. Banville had made at a previous hearing with regard to an "open ditch" at the rear of his property in Witchcraft Heights area, which he thought should be elimin- inated by the developer in that district . In the letter to Mr. Banville , the Board stated that a Board Member had inspected the site and it was determined that this gully is a natural one , an open swale , and not a condition that developed because of improper design oi, construction. The • Board informed Mr. Banville that it has no jurisdiction whatsoever over problems such as this . A Form A application accompanied by a plan of land at 95-97 Federal Street was received from Mr. Nelson Kessler; a portion of this parcel of land is to be conveyed to Harlan B. Peabody, Jr. , and is to become an integral part of his land which has frontage on Federal Court . With Mr. Pitcoff refraining from voting on this application, on motion made and seconded, it was voted to endorse this plan. A Form A application was also received from the Boston and Maine Corpora- tion, accompanied by a plan showing a 4000 square feet strip of land off Jefferson Avenue , in the rear of land of E. &.F. King & Company, Inc . , of Jackson Street . This 4000 square foot parcel is to be transferred to the King Company with frontage on Jackson Street . On motion made and seconded it was voted to endorse this plan. A discussion followed on a plan entitled "Witchcraft III" submitted by the developer through his counsel, George P. Vallis . Mr. Joseph Carter, engin- eer for the developer, the City Engineer, Neal B. Mitchell, and Doctor John J. Toomey, Director of the Board of Health went over these plans in detail , to see if existing difficulties could be ironed out before the Plan- ning Board gives its approval to the plan. It was suggested that Mr. Carter meet with Mr. Mitchell to learn what revisions and modifications were nec- essary. Mr. William Mahoney, member of the Board of Health, offered his comments and suggestions on the plan, and said his Board will meet any time • with the developer' s engineer and counsel , in order to prevent any unnec- essary delay in granting approval to these plans . - 2 - Mr. Vallis proposed that the overall plan eliminate Lots #244, #245, and #173, since at the present time , no services have been provided for these lots . After a thorough examination of. the plans it was felt they should be revised and modified, with a progress date on each plan, to conform to the recommendations of the City Engineer and the Board of Health before they are resubmitted. One problem the Board is concerned with is the water supply. The new auxiliary pumping Station on Highland Avenue will: increase the pressure beyond Valley Street and up around Marlborough Road and Rockdale Avenue . Mr. Morton Braun of the Planning Services Group spoke to the Board about the procedure and recommendations in connection with obtaining federal Funds for the 701 Urban Assistance Program. An order from the City Coun- cil , approved by the Mayor on October 30 , 1967 was read. This order sta- ted "That the Planning Board is hereby authorized to apply for Federal funds under Section #701 , Urban Planning Assistance Program" . . Mr. Braun was invited, and agreed to attend, the next meeting of this Board which will be held on November 16 . Mr. Frederick Fallon, Director of the Bureau of Planning Assistance , is scheduled to attend this meeting also. A communication from Architect James Ballou applying for consideration as a consultant to the Board was read. The Board is already committed to the •Planning Services Group. This was the final business of the evening, and it was voted to adjourn at 10 : 30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, C 'TY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk • Ctu of Salem, 'Massttelluse##s FIMMinm$ Pnttrb �°hn . 05rng, 7jr. November 21 , 1967 f�ernlD ffi. !fll[cQInrth� 'M1Chael nsh°fist MINUTES OF MEETING - - - NOVEMBER 16 , 1967 citu Pull Albert P. Vitraff lem, gnssnrhnsetts Auum°nD 7. Afroeeneg With Michael Paskowski , Albert Pitcof£ and Gerald McCarthy attending, the meeting was opened by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , at 7 : 30 P .M. The reading of the minutes of the last meeting was dispensed with as all members had received copies prior to this meeting, and on motion made and seconded, it was voted to accept the minutes so approved. At a meeting of the Board with the City Council in June , 1967 at which proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code were dis- cussed, one of the Councillors suggested the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments be further amended to allow for storage of non-commercial "Vacation-type" trailers on the owner' s premises . Mr. Gray read this amendment , and stated this will be forwarded with all information on the proposed amendments to the new City Council coming in in January. He will also write a definition of fraternity and sorority houses . Councillor Perron will introduce these at an early Council meeting. • George P. Vallis , Counsel for Salem Acres , Inc . , and Mr. Carter, Engin- eer for the same developer, appeared with a plan entitled "Witchcraft Heights III" , seeking the Board' s approval of this definitive plan. Letters from the Health Department and from the City Engineer giving ap- proval to this plan were read to the Board. This is a Subdivision plan, dated June 19 , 1967 , Revised November 6 , 1967. Motion was made for the Planning Board to waive the following: 1. Width of street from required fifty feet to forty feet . 2. Length of the dead-end road extend from a minimum of five hundred feet to five hundred sixty feet . 3 . Omit the granite curbing and install bituminous curbing. Motion seconded, four members present voting approval, so moved. Mr. Pit- coff moved that since we have a letter from the Board of Health to the effect that the most recent revision takes care of all previous objec- tions which had been made by the Board of Health, and having in mind that we now have a communication from the City Engineer in which he informs • I 2 - the Board that all of his previous suggestions have been complied with in the most recent revision of this plan which is dated November 6 , 1967 , Mr. Pitcof£ further stated "I move that the plan be endorsed as being approved by this Board. It is the understanding of this Board that the difficulty with water pressure will be rectified within a few weeks by the completion of another contract under which the City is engaged and which is currently in progress" ; seconded by Mr. McCarthy, all four mem- bers present voting in favor, plan was voted approved. Mr. Vallis then spoke of the requirements under the new Subdivision Reg- ulations regarding an inspector to view the work of installing utilities . Mr. Gray suggested that the developer have a work schedule made up. The inspector should be on the job the minute the developer starts the trench- ing. Forward a copy of the work schedule to this Board and also, one copy to the City Engineer. Mr. Pitcoff moved that we certify that we have approved the definitive j, plan, "Witchcraft Heights III" , and we file a copy with the City Clerk � � IFI�and deliver a copy of the vote to the applicant as required by the Sub- f�'' ,, division rules and regulations ; motion seconded, all in favor, so votedp .kl'�'Ojn, Mr. Frederick Fallon, Director of the Bureau of Planning Assistance , hav- ing been invited to attend this meeting previously, next spoke with re- gard to the proceedures necessary to obtain Federal funds under the 11701" program. He furnished each member with certain literature explaining the requirements to qualify under this program. Mr. Fallon said he or a mem- ber of his staff, would be available at any meetings where he might be of assistance to the Board with regard to funding programs . Mr. Mort Braun, Consultant to the Board, was also present and he spoke along the same lines . "He furnished copies of a "Program of Planning Studies" which his office had prepared to each member. With regard to this , there will be a special meeting of the Board to discuss this plan on November 30, 1967 . Mr. Theodore Simons , newly appointed president of the Citizens Advis6ry Committee , shall be invited to attend this meeting. This ended the meeting, and it was voted to adjourn at 10 : 15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, • • SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF SALEM A special meeting of the Planning Board was held on November 30, 1967 , at 7 :30 P .M. w T a Present were the Chairman and members Sweeney, McCarthy and Pitcoff, also by invitation of the Board the newly appointed member Theodore Sadowski; and also Mr. John Barrett. 0 e Member Albert R. Pitcoff was designated to serve as Acting WClerk for this meeting. W < On motion duly made and seconded, it was W E` VOTED: To place in the records of this meeting our shock and sorrow at the passing of our late member Michael Paskowski, who has for years with quiet dignity and efficiency served both as a member and as Clerk of this Board; and to write to the family o Q of the late member expressing our condolences. • 0, On motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To submit to the Mayor through our Chairman the budget for the year 1968 which has been prepared and submitted to this Board by the Chairman. There was further discussion of the contents of the proposals submitted by our consultant for a program of planning studies dated November 1967. Theodore Simons, . Chairman of the Citizens Advisory Committee, communicated through his representative Mr. Barrett his regret at being unable to be present at this meeting. It was agreed that a list of the present members of that Committee will be furnished to the Planning Board and further arrangements will be made for continued liaison with the Committee. On motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To endorse a Form A application submitted by Alexander E. a and Eleanor Schettino, relating to a plan of a parcel at #31 Jackson Street in Salem. - There being no further business, he meeting was adjourned. °. ADJOURNED. Attest- Clerk pro tem W (!1 011 J MEETING OF ThE PLANNING BOARD The regularly scheduled meeting of the City Planning Board was held at the Hawthorne Motor Hotel on December 21, 1967. This was the regular annual dinner meeting of the Hoard. All members were present at the meeting. The only order of business brought before the Board was an applica- tion, Form A. Harry and Arlene R. Parker, through their counsel Edward A. Coffey, for endorsement of a plan rela.t- ing to property at 55-57 Broad Street in Salem, the purpose being to define boundary lines. On motion made and seconded • it was VOTED - To endorse. The business meeting having been concluded, Board mem- bers and their guests adjourned to a dining room to enjoy their dinners. Respectfully submitted, ,lar tz � Clerk, Pro TeM • } 3 3� 3 z 164 ?opt , -7 -7,Sb 2�0�-- a_ a �1 y.5 Jt--✓ - t 5 5`51 3...j_i it. Yr a f t MEETING OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD A regular meeting of the Planning Board was held on December 7, 1967 , at 7 :30 P.M. Present were Mr. Gray, the Chairman, presiding, and members Pitcoff and McCarthy. On motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To dispense with the reading of the records of the last meeting of the Board. In connection with the scheduled hearing relating to the definitive subdivision plan of Heritage Heights, notice of which has been published and notices of which have been sent to the various abutters of Ugo DiBiase, Trustee of DiBiase Realty Trust, there were present the applicant by his attorney George Vallis, who spoke in favor, and a number of abutters, who examined the plans, asked questions of the attorney and of the engineer who also was present, and who had various questions and comments to make regarding the subdivision, but without criticism. Following the close of the hearing at 8:33 P .M. , on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: That the definitive plans relating to this subdivision be and hereby are approved. On motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: That Albert R. Pitcoff, Clerk pro tem, is hereby authorized to prepare and to certify copies of the vote of approval of said sub- division plans and to file the same with the City Clerk and to furnish a copy thereof to the applicant in accordance with the rules and regulations of this Board. A Form A application relating to bots A, B and C shown on a plan of petitioners Mildred Scott and Alfred C. Bradley on Cross Avenue was presented to the meeting for its consideration, and on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. A Form A application relating to Lots A and B on Savoy Road filed by the applicant Gertrude A. Stabenar was presented to- the meeting for its consideration, and on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. . A Form A application of Roland A. L 'Heureux et ux relating to two lots on Dearborn Street in Salem, a variance having been granted by the Board of Appeals, .was presented to the meeting for its consideration, and on motion duly made and seconded, it was � . i VOTED: To endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. i A form A application of Robert Talbot relating to land on 2 Buchanan Road, a variance having been granted by the Board of Appeals, relating to the lot size of both parcels shown on the plan, was presented to the meeting for its consideration, and on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To -endorse this plan as not requiring approval under the SubdivisionControlLaw. A representative of the Salem Oil & Grease Co. with a request for an interpretation of this Board- of the zoning map relating to the boundaries of an industrial zone in which it is said to have property situated. It was suggested to the inquirer that it is beyond the power of this Board to interpret for any persons the provisions -of the zoning ordinance and that his inquiry would be better directed to the City Solicitor or that alternatively, in view of the pending zoning proposals presently in the hands of the City Council, he might take such action as he might see fit in order to present any proposal zoning amendment to the ordinance which he might think to be appropriate, for consideration by the City Council. A letter drafted by tiie Chairman memorializing the passing of our' late member Michael Paskowski was presented to the meeting, and on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To forward this letter to the Salem Evening News for publication in its columns and to furnish a copy thereof to the family of our late member. On motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED THAT: twenty days having expired following the approval of subdivision of Witchcraft Heights III, the members will on December 8, 1967, endorse the plan already approved by this Board. There being no further business, on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To adjourn. Adjourned. Attest• 4Clerk pro tem aoo -, nl . .I BOORUM & PEASE " �F�vt" ® BOORUM & PEASE " ®g^ix" UR w 'a ]Manning Pourb John 0. trap, Sr. feralb T. jfficdlarthp 39 414urch o44trat Michael 'Vaskofaeki ,Albert�. Vitcoff �falem, �klassachuoetto Ppmoab A. o4fnecuep To His Honor, Francis %. Collins, Mayor of Salem, and The Honorable City Council: Gentlemen: During the year 1966, the City Planning Board held regular meetings at the Planning Board office on the first and third Thursdays of each month. At these meetings which are open to the publiclall applications are acted upon, and without exception, at every meeting, applications relating to the Subdivision Rules and Regulations are received and acted upon. The majority of such applications fall under the category of Form A, i.e. "Plans which are believed not to constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Regulations". Approximately thirty (30) Form "A's" were endorsed by the Board by meeting the requirements. . J Four were not endorsed because the Board felt the lots involved were sub- divisions. Two of these applications were later refiled as Subdivision s applications. Two applications for subdivision were filed on Form "B's", i.e. "Plans submitted in a preliminary form for tentative approval as a Subdiv- ision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Regulations". One ap- plication was rejected because of lack of information. The other applica- tion was approved. Shortly after that, the second applicant submitted a "Definitive" plan accompanied by a Form "C" application, i.e. "Definitive t Plan of Land deemed a Subdivision under the Subdivision Control Regulations" which was approved. L ` 2 During 1966 and right up to the time of the submission of this re- port, the Board has held interviews with several prospective developers regarding apartment "clusters" and/or business/commercial developments in Salem. Some ideas presented left a favorable impression with the Board. A few proposals were presented in such a way that the Board was left with the impression that a veritable "Pandora's Box" was being left for a "Hydra-headed Monster" to open and unravel. Another problem presented to the Board was the proposed development of the land owned by the Associated Grocers, Inc. , (the "Lead Mills"), on upper Lafayette Street near the Marblehead line. Although, insofar as the Salem Zoning Ordinance stipulated, the matter was not within the jur- isdiction of the Planning Board, the proposed development because it in- cluded a proposed new street, would eventually have to be approved by the Board. The layout of the entire development was predicated first on the assumption that the Town of Marblehead would grant certain concessions, and secondly upon the acquisition by the applicant of waterfront land now t9 owned by the Boston and Maine Railroad. Counsel for the Associated Grocers, Inc. , has advised the Board that to date neither question has been settled, so this development has not been finalized. In previous reports the Board has made reference to various City Or- dinances. In the past few years revisions in the following ordinances and regulations have been prepared for study and discussion: - Subdivision Control, etc. , Building Code, and Zoning Ordinance, etc. After considerable consultation and research, the Board has reached the conclusion that all of the ordinances should be constantly reviewed and updated. The Board has in Wits review found that many ordinances now in effect conflict, and in some cases supersede, one another. Because of this, the Board is now preparing �_•V - 3 - certain recommendations to amend some of the ordinances, particularly those referring to advertising, building, subdivision, streets, etc. At the time of this report, these recommendations are being printed in a "preliminary" form. They will then be presented to the various department heads and the City Council for review, after which they will be formally presented with the Board's recommendations. At the end of the calendar year 1966, the outcome of the renewal plan "Heritage Plaza East" could not be determined. Because of this, many future studies by the Board are being held in abeyance, pending the final approval of the plan. Salem's "Workable Program" which .has already been completed and approved for 1966, will have to be yearly updated and approved by HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development). The 1966 Capital Improve- ments program has been completed and is now being printed. If the "Workable Program" is to be continued, a review of the "Neighborhood Analysis" must be submitted by the Board this year, (1967). As the Workable Program will be an annual matter, the Board is now re- viewing all programs under the jurisdiction of HUD. The Board intends to apply for a supplementary appropriation when the HUD requirements are fully analyzed. At this time, it seems that the updating of the "Neighborhood Analysis" will have the highest priority. It is possible that an appropria- tion of seven to eight thousand dollars will be requested, some of which might be reimbursible. Unfortunately, the Board chairman has been confined at home for sev- eral weeks because of illness . Although a great many duties could be handled Eby telephone or by home meetings, as Chairman, I wish to express my thanks to Board Members Gerald McCarthy, Michael Paskowski, Albert Pitcoff, and Raymond Sweeney, for carrying on the work of the Board without interruption. •` - 4 - I also wish to express my thanks to Mrs. Christine Callahan, our secre- tary, for the extra work that she has done to keep up with our agenda. Respectfully submitted, /l/ /John . ,ray, Jr. , irman ROSTER MASSACHUSETTS FEDERATION _ Of PLANNING BOARDS February 14, 1967 p Month Day Year planning Board - City or Town SALEM or Zoning Board of Appeal - City or Town Address of Board ROOM 79 T2 HALL SALEM MASS. Membership Term Title Name Street Address Expires Chairman John M. Gray,__Jroe 54 Raymond Road 5/1/71 Raymond F. Sweeney 1$ Chandler Road 5/167 Michael Paakoweki 20 Bow Street 5/1/70 Gerald T. McCarthy 6 Lowe" Street 5/1 .69 Albert R. Pitcoff 3$ Dearborn Street 5/1/68 Please forward at your earliest convenience to Joseph M. Magaldi, Secretary P. 0. Box 31, Braintree, Maes. 02189 It is further requested that you promptly advise of all changes in membership on your Board as they may occur throughout the year. l rpwo� 10-14tu of Salem, 4Httssarhueie##s • Planning Pourbi Sohn f. (SraQ, 3r. December 5, 1966 Geralb X. OcOlarthg Oicllael �askofuski 34 (91lurell f§trret ,filbert �1. Vitroff Salem, Massachusetts agmana . 6(uerneg Hon. Francis X. Collins, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Mayor : The City Planning Board requests an appropriation of $9,000. for the year 1967, and submits the following item— ized budget : Miscellaneous Expenses Including Supplies . . . $ 150.00 Association Memberships . . . .+, . . . . . 100.00 MGeneral Advertising . . . . . . . . . . 2,000.00 Printing and Mimeo Services 850.00 Clerical 750.00 Incidentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.00 Planning Consultant, Per Diem Basis . . . . . . 4,300.00 Workable Programme . . . . . . . . . . . $00.00 TOTAL $ 9.000.00 Rey6p@ctfully subbmitee4f,,,CITY PLANNiNG 4A ;J Chairma , January 90 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey,. City Clerk, ' City Halls Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on January 5, 1967, it was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not required" on the following described plan 16 Applicant - Frank Litwin;, 406 Essex Street, Salem# Mass. 2. Location and Description - Lots #1 and #2 corner of Buffum and Harmony Streets, to transfer 46 sq ft to Lot #1 from Lot #2 to provide sufficient area for building purposes. 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex County South Registry Book 5372 Page 304 Very truly yours,. MPocc er P . q f ll t J of 1" alr l ffineSarlIU20411ED Q��� �lttt[nin$ �nttr� DEC Z9 159 PH '66 CITY CLERMS OFFICE SALEM, MASS, 34 (94=4 Street FORM Aaleur, ttssttrltusetis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., f r ----------------------19 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision withinthethe meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) __-___ --- -- ---t--{---------- - -- --- - ----------- --------------------------- and herewith_ submits said plan fordetermination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. r • 1. Name of Applicant --- -- - / --- ------ — — ---------------------- Address Q -------z"``=T� — '�__ — ----------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor_ �_____ _ ____ _ -- - - - -- -------------- -�-y- -�--�---�-,-�-�--,-,, Addressd p °L°— --�-- --- --------------------------------------------- - — --=--- _----------------------- 3. Deed of property records in _________ __________________________________Registry G Book — 7-Y--- Page ---S90 ------ 4. Location and Description of Property: .l -- ----- - ------------------- - Signature of Owne ---- _ ------ - -- -------------------- Address __ �----------�r�__'____- _____ -- - -- -------------- ag„ January 9, 1967 I Mr. Augustine J:. Toomey, City 'Clerk,. Gita Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mrs Toomey: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City'of Salem held on January 5; 19670 it wad ' VOTED; - To endorse °Approval Pander the subdivision control Law not required" on the following described plan 1 Applicant o Philomena Calabrese, 14 Bertuccio Avenue, Salean, Mass. 2. Location and Description > 405 'sq ft 'land in rear of Onelli property on Bertucci Avenue to be conveyed to said Onelli in accordance with decree of the Superior 6ourt. 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex County South Registry Book 3236 Page 119 Very truly yours$ MP:cc r er Lit leilY, �Mass tzrhagetts �1TYS��E�A. AN 34 V111rch terr6 �nlrm, �'InRs:,;lrasrife FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section 11-B. Salem, Mass., -- _ ____.-January5.,._ ---- .__-_1967 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned. believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see -Sect. II-A) both parcels.have the-necescar_y-.frontage_on_BErtuccio.AveRuealolig.with-all-the-requisite utilities. to thcr, theplanis necessary in o. der-to, showa-cgnV yance of a_parcel of.land n �ccon.}�ue with th@ aeoree o fhe Superior Cogcf ... n I,cn,vit , submits said plan for a �etermuration and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the tinbdicision C'onirol f,aw is not required. I. Acme of Applicant Philomena_Ca Calabrese - --._..- - - -- - - ------ Ac Address 14 Bertuccio Avenue,. Salem, Massachusetts 2. Name of Fngineer or Surveyor . E:dwa d_T-.-I3ridz_ynski.--_ ----- ---- Address 260 Lafayette Street, Sateni,. Massachuse is-_-- -. 3, Dccd of property records in Essex South ,District Begistry I;nok 3235 .^:'9'.aga 119 4. Loralinn and'Dc<cripiion of I'mperl.V: . As shown in.the-plan.. Signature of [hvncr 44 _C 07924_pzpt,_. (11 Address 3 C to of 'Salem, 'Massarbllsrfts 1hanning �nrzrD �ofln flA. Grails. January 9, 1967 Gerald Z. ,1'C{r(Lurtlt� 34 @i!lurch street Aiicllael 13asknfnaki -,`�'ulem, �{uss+rhusetts ,Albert Y. JOitcuff �fay;muna �F. �fnreneq To the Honorable City Council. , City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen : Since the adoption of the Zoning and Building Codes, the Building Inspector has informed us that there have been sev- eral borderline cases that have been brought to his attention that need clarification. The Planning Board has also noted that Chapters 3 and 28 also refer to certain types of signs that appear to be dupli— cations in both chapters and in the zoning and building codes. • The Board feels that all matters pertaining to signs should be under one chapter so that there would not be at,,,,, conflict. In addition to the subject of sigra there have been sev- eral other items that have been brought to our attention that reed to be clarified in both codes. The Planning Board has been preparing suggested amendments to the various chapters so that all of these items will be under one heading. Therefore, the Hoard requests that a liason sub- committee ittee o£ the Council be appointed to meet with the Hoard at a time mutually agreed upon so that these matters can be fully discussed before they are presented in their final form. Very trulyours yours, JMG :cc ' t,hairma '✓ January 31, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hail, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on January 19, 1967, it was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not required" on the following described plan • 1. Applicant - Vera Warner,, Trustee of Highland Realty Trust $0 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 2. Location and Description - Vacant land on the southeast side of Highland Avenue 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex County. South Registry Book5292 Page 734 Certificate of Title No. 35460 In Registration, Book 155, Page 35460 Very Y Y ours truly , MP:cc er • �� aECE�v�� Ctv of "$ttlern, 'Mttssadjuu##s Sat fanning Puttrb Jai► �3 o FticE C�S�SA�EM�MASS 34 @I4=4 street FORM A f6alttn, assac!?usetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., --j ----------- �s------------19--67- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ---4" lc� -a_�--a 1 q-fid bus a _v al meat 8d �sfa is »_endo a e i1 _c the n=01" B0494 is mired, and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. .. 1. Name of Applicant ------ era-MMM63 _Trust"-ff__H �` E$ ._ty---I=" --------- Address _ -- etd4lYIIi &t7t� £l34i:41i __ � {E-_-- -- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor------AN=__ VOY1 -_5��1 Address - 3. Deed of property records m ______ ____ W10 ___Re 'stry Districts C'Ott � of le N* 33"o al tan B 1S , « S5460, racorft4 oo ------- --- age ---- connge scprpt* 734* with $9Bm th District $�tI 4. Loaroorty -------------------------- ------- --------- --------- 1=4 southeast OL& of - U04-Ate_ftd as Ofoxes"d_ _1�VID1�L�0 � itl iia► ate_bWAUM da_ lots fWat %b— -- 'tit Plauftb* Boad Signature of Owner . Address -s--Bina---I+-- --- ---Us Jmnavy 17, 1967 TO THE HBO CA+ TFS DEPA.RMITs Door Sir: I resp ectflo2ly rawat ym fele year usual report 3n gLlic tete at this office on orb ore Anrll 15. 1967. Thar* rail]. be no second regmst for you to file snob a report. Each day or week after that wM hold up the printing of dots as ordered Irr the City Cmmcil on Janes 22 1967 and approved by the Mayor an • Jsorsnai 7 4s 1967. Very truly yours AdTAc AUMMME J. C= CLARK • Item 29— Salem Beverly Wat4fer Supply Board; Salem pays 2/3 and Beverly 1/3 of the financing • of the water supply. At its next meeting the Planning Board should discuss amending this formula, and check with the City Fathers to determine if this is a favorable proportion since Beverly is the same size as the City of Salem, population wise and industrially; maybe a 50-50 formula should be adopted. This may come under State Department on Waterways. • n, ,.EGISLATIV-E�HEA.RIN.G JANUARY_ 31.1967 1,0 ;30 A .M. ;,X MERCANTILE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ° 14—The Berkshire Eagle, Tuesday, Jan. 17, 1967 The Eagle Published every day except Sunday and holidays by the EAGLE PUBLISHING COMPANY 33 Eagle Street, PtUafield, Massachusetts Editorials A Double Check on Signs For years, the Massachusetts Roadside local controls by forbidding the Outdoor Council and other organizations dedi- Advertising Authority to grant permits cated to preserving some of the state's for signs that have not received the ap• natural beauty have been working for proval of the cities and towns in which a simple and sensible change in the they are to be located. This is not the law governing outdoor advertising. same thing as giving the local communi- The change would bar the state's Out- ties final authority over signs, for the door Advertising Authority (OAA) from OAA still would be able to prohibit them granting billboard permits over the even when local officials have granted heads of local officials or in opposition approval' What it amounts to is a to local protective bylaws. double check on outdoor advertising, with a veto available on the local level The change is designed to correct a glaring defect in existing state regula- as well as the state]eveo tions which allow the OAA to disregard The multiplication of signs along Massachusetts roadsides, even within the express wishes of the people who well-zoned cities and towns, testifies to must live with the signs. Under the the need for such a double check. present set-up, a community may estab- As it happens, at least two measures lish restrictions upon signs and admin- to that end have been filed for legisla- ister them impartially and conscientious- tive action in 1967. One, filed by state ly—only to find that the sign applicant Senator George D. Hammond, R-West- has obtained carte blanche from the bill- field, would require the approval of board authority in Boston. cities and towns prior to the issuance of This has happened time and again in OAA permits for signs. Another, filed the Berkshires, and despite vigorous in the House by the Massachusetts Road. protests from local officials the upshot side Council, would, among other re- in almost every case has been a victory forms, require the OAA to deny permits for the sign owner. Instances in which for billboards violating local zoning or planning boards or selectmen have suc- building codes. ceeded in winning, OAA backing for Both meet the primary need by bol- their vetoes have been few and far be- stering "home rule." They deserve vig- ween. orous, broad-based backing in the legis- Tbe obvious remedy is to strengthen lature this year. i 7 MASSACHUSETTS ROADSIDE COUNCIL 20 Louisburg Square, Boston CA7-9062 We believe the following legislation will be of interest to you: On Outdoor Advertising H.2242 The Massachusetts Roadside Council has filed Legislation for con- sideration by the General Court in 1966 to strengthen the regulation of billboards throughout the Commonwealth. Our Bill would amend the present law as follows: a. Extend the jurisdiction of the Outdoor Advertising Authority to include public property. At present, the Authority may regulate signs only on private property, yet some of the most offensive conditions exist on public land. No reason for the distinction exists and it should be eliminated. The Outdoor Advertising Authority last year supported this change. • b. Require the Outdoor Advertising Authority to deny permits for billboards which violate local zoning or building codes. Presently the Authority may gran p mTs--w-iTFo-u-Fregar o oca opposition nor to the character of the area involved. This change would eliminate one of the most conspicuous invasions of home rule. c. Forbid signs with moving parts. Since these spectacular signs are especially designed to seize the attention of the motorist, they are a menace to highway safety and should be banned from our roadsides. d. Prohibit the erection of billboards designed primarily to be seen from limited access ways. All other roadside business is banned from these beautiful and enormously expensive new roads. No reason exists why the billboard industry alone should deface them as it has the Massachusetts Turnpike. 5.524 requiring the approval of cities and towns prior to the issuance of permits for signs by the Outdoor Advertising Board. (Similar to Section b of your Council's bill.) Sen. Hammond of Westfield. Seven other bills requiring such approval have been filed: S.538, H.8111 H,.3637, H.959, H.1O88, H.1239, H.3795. H.119 to regulate the establishment of junkyards on Interstate Highways and H.123 to provide for the control of outdoor advertising on Interstate Highways, appear to be designed to give State support to the Federal Highway Beautification Act of 1965. (Until the Federal Standards have been finally c �✓ defined, it seems advisable to withhold judgment on these bills.) 30�r 0 �= ®OPERATIVE EXTENSI®N AGRICULTURE RE X,d6M4'1' �2"�PirtdGQ�li �� DANVERS• 774-0050 ESSEX AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL INSTITUTE CONCORD- 388.4845 oR 892.2380 HATHORNE. MASSACHUSETTS WORCESTER - 753.5477 January 20, 1967 LANDSCAPE DESIGN IN REGIONAL PLANNING You are invited to attend a meeting on Landscape Design in Regional Planning which will be held at the Essex Agricultural and Technical Institute on Thursday, February 2, 1967, at 8:00 P.M. (Main Administration Building) Professor Ervin Zube, Head of the Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Massachusetts, will discuss some of the new concepts in planning and the imaginative ways that planners and landscape designers have developed to meet our growing demands. Professor Zube has had wide experience in the field of landscape design having taught and professionally practiced in California, Wisconsin, and New England. • From 1961 to 1963 he was a Fellow of the American Academy of Rome, Italy where he studied the regional development and design programs currently practiced in many countries that have already confronted the pressures on landscape resources that we are just beginning to experience. Town and City Officials, Regional Planning Officials, Conservation Commissions, Planning Boards Recreation Commission and organizations interested in Conservation such as League of Women Voters, Conservation Trusts and Soil Conservation District Directors, will find through this meeting a wealth of information in planning for intelligent use of our land and resources. Dr. Carl A. Carlozzi, Associate Professor of Resource Planning, will be the Chairman at this meeting, sponsored jointly by the University of Massachusetts and the Essex Agricultural and Technical Institute. Sincerely, JFG:rs James F. Gallant, Director Essex County Extension Service Will you distribute the extra copies which are enclosed to those whom you feel would be interested? J04i 4 fMezG, O/GGAw4eO r' a4u Dx'st lfPJG aQa� AN EDUCATIONAL SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC CONDUCTED IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS. AND MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW • 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 RES., 99 PLEASANT STREET TELEPHONE 744-2172 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1105 January 23, 1967 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Salem Acres , Inc. "Witchcraft Heights" Gentlemen: My records show that the Planning Board is presently holding as security for performance of certain work under the Protective Covenants between Salem Acres , Inc. and the Planning Board, dated May 18 , 1965 , the total sum of • $36,000.00 as follows : Item 1. Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Book No. 88227 in the sum of $10,000.00 for completion of roads bounding Lots 24 to 51 inclusive, 84 to 88 inclusive and 112 and 113. Item 2. Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Book No. 88226 in the sum of $6 ,000.00 for completion of roads , curbs and sidewalks bounding Lots 79 to 83 inclusive and 52 to 56 inclusive. Item 3 . Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Book No. 88704 in the sum of $20 ,000.00 for completion of roads , curbs and sidewalks bounding Lots 57 to 74 inclusive, 76 to 78 inclusive and 98 to 111 inclusive. I have been informed by my client, Salem Acres , Inc. , that the work with respect to items 1 and 2 have been totally completed and that the work with respect to item 3 has been also completed with the exception of the final layers of hot top surface on the roads. • Planning Board -2- January 23 , 1967 It is my client' s wish that the monies held under items 1 and 2 be released in full and that the amount withheld under item 3 be reduced to an amount commensurate with the uncompleted work. It is the further wish of my client that he be permitted to post another security bond with the Board in consideration for the release of the conditions under the said Protective Covenants , the following lots shown in the "Witchcraft Subdivision Plan" : Lots 1 , 2, 3, 9 to 23 inclusive , and 87 to 97 inclusive. Said lots being bounded by Puritan Road, Witchcraft Road, Pioneer Circle and Witch Way. It is respectfully requested that the Planning Board furnish this office with an estimate that it will require for security to complete the necessary work as required under the Subdivision Control Laws in connection with the above referenced lots . It is also hoped that the Planning Board, if it is in accord with the information furnished to this office , will release the bank books referred to in items 1 and 2 and reduce the security referred to in item 3 to a more realistic figure. Ver tru1 y r , Oil GEORGE P. VALLIS, Attorney for Salem Acres , Inc. GPV/ijp cc Mr. Neil B. Mitchell City Engineer Office of the Mayor City Hall Beverly, Mass. • 23 January, 1967 To: Mayors Selectmen Boards of Health Town Managers Planning Boards South Fssea Sewerage District Subject: Solid Waste Disposal Gentlemen: The Regional Refuse Disposal Planning Committee of the City of Beverly has planned a regional meeting to be held in the Aldermanic Chambers City Hall Beverly, Mass. on Tuesday, January 31, 1967 at 8:00 P.M. • to present to municipal officials in the area, pertinent and timeJ,y information on solid waste disposal. The Agenda, beginning at 8:00 P.M. will consist of: A. Presentation of a new 16 minute color film titled "The 3rd Pollution" which describes America's $3,000,000,000. a year solid waste problem and shows new techniques of solid waste management. B. Information on the Department of Public Health's activities in Solid Waste Disposal Programs ' C. The Federal Government's Solid Waste Disposal Program D. Current bills before the legislature and status thereof (Representative F. W. Hatch, Jr.) - Some of these bills include provisions for the Mass. Dept. of Public Works to provide solid waste disposal facilities for use of municipalities. • - Others provide for construction grants and/or financial assistance to municipalities to defray routine operating costs. i - 2 - • E. Open discussion on - Where are ve going from here? - Where do we want to go from here? - What, needgto be done now? You and special committees you may have formed in regard to this matter are invited and urgently requested to attend and participate in this meeting. Very truly yours, Carl V. Joslin Mayor cc: Mayors, Selectmen, Boards of Health and Tann Managers of Beverly Danvers . Essex Gloucester Hamilton Manchester Marblehead Peabody Rockport Salem Swampscott Wenham • . a i � O 000 '' ' �er��,�/iCadJac`i.��deffd� 01915 TELEPHONE 827.2123 January 23, 1967 A SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR AGENCY BOARD PRESIDENTS At the request of non-profit agencies of the North Shore area, the North Shore Community College, Division of Continuing Education, is sponsoring a non-credit six-week institute for Board members. The institute will convene Monday evening, February 133 1967 at 8 p.m. , and will con- tinue weekly each Monday evening through March 20. The enclosed brochure depicts the program. We would appreciate your calling this to the attention of all your Board members at your earliest convenience. The registration deadline is February 6, 1967. Sincerely, Warland Hersey, Director /L Division of Continuing Studies WH/c THE INSTITUTE PROGRAM Funding, employment, overall administration of Community Agencies. Implications of Seminar I - February 13, 1967 Federal funding and subsidies. Cultural Influences within the Speaker: North Shore Region Attorney William G. Evans, Senior Partner, 9 t Evans and Evans, East Boston and Topsfield, — The region's people - their needs, interests, ` Massachusetts. mores, customs. — Regionalism and Provincialism - urban vs. Seminar IV - March 6, 1967 r2/20unClf2C� rural concepts and the North Shore Com- Ethics munity. an— The physical, social and economic settings — The total picture of Boards. - which demand specialized sociological, physical — Social prestige and "sacred cows". and economical services for the people of the region and the role these agencies play in — Spoils system - self perpetuation of member- meeting these needs. ship. Speaker: — Role conflicts vsproprietory interests. Mr. Kenneth Haygood,Assistant Professor and Speaker: Staff Associate, Center for Study of Liberal Mr. Campbell Murphy, Director, Special Pro- Education for Adults, Boston University, and grams, United Community Services of Metro- szL Senior Associate Leadership Resources, Incor- politan Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. iti:ta, porated; National Management and Consult- ing Services, Boston, Massachusetts. Seminar V - March 13, 1967 Seminar II - February 20, 1967 i Public Relations and Communications ?Or Structure and Responsibilities of Boards in Social Relations Skills, attitudes, knowledge, qualifications — Internal, external public relation'.practices ,. and procedures within the Community and. ,.{ t �ah� responsibilities of Board members. . within the Agency. Balance of membership. - Roles, duties, functions of Boards. I - The.art and responsibility of communications Role of professional staff. t Speaker: / Relationships between Board members and } Mr. Woodbridge Brown, President, Radio { meml eri staff (inter and intra-agency responsibilities). Design, Inc., Montague, Massachusetts: Policy-determination vs. policy-execution. f Speaker:P Seminar VI March 20, 1961 Dr. Lewis Goldstein, Professor and Director t of Research, School of Social Work, Univer- I Problem-Solving sity of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut. $ onsored — Definition of problems—Source, Nature, Type. P Seminar III • February 21, 1967 i — Presentation of problems. by Legal Structure of Boards — It is suggested st problems. 9 � It is suggested that each participant formulate NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Aspects of Federal, State and local corporate i a problem, or problems, of immediate concern DIVISION OF CONTINUING STUDIES legislation of concern to Board members in- to his agency - these problems will serve as the dividually and collectively. nuclei for discussion during Seminar VI. _ 1 9 6 7 Torts and contracts - review of significance of - Speaker: contractual concepts and variety of tortuous Mr. Fred Nader, Staff Associate, Department acts which might relate to litigation within i of Human Relations, Boston University, Bos- agency activity. ton, Massachusetts. i The Institute: North Shore Community College is under- During the formal discussion period, Institute taking a training institute for lay Board members participants will divide into small sub-groups of non-profit agencies. under the direction of a Discussion Leader (to he selected in advance from the roster of partici- Agencies are most effective when the govern- pants). At this time dialogue will, hopefully, pro- ing authority, such as the lay Board, assumes a duce questions of a general interest nature to be policy and planning role. By not assuming this presented to the combined membership during the role, the Board member's effectiveness as well as question period designated. Different Discussion NORTH SNORE the effectiveness of the organization is decreased. Leaders will be chosen for each seminar. Board members are generally comprised of COMMUNTY COLLEGE lay leaders or interested citizens who come to the fee: Board with a great variety of educational, poli- tical and professional backgrounds. It is necessary $15 per participant covers all expenses of the to develop a cohesiveness and goals or purposes Institute and includes a copy of the Summary Harold E. Shively toward which the Board members can strive. Report to be issued at the conclusion of the In- President The purpose of this Institute is to assist lay stitute program. Agencies might give consideration to sponsorship of participants from their agency: Board members in understanding their role, Dana E. Harlow attaining cohesiveness, and giving them the tools Dean of the College to effectively function in the policy making role. Calendar' Robert E. Francis There are fifty-two United Fund non-profit agencies in the North Shore area serving a popu- February Dean of Student Services lation of 570,087. Examples of agencies interested in this project are Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, S M T W T F S YMCA, Campfire Gids, American Red Cross, Catholic Charities and the like. In addition to the 1 2 3 4 Division of Continuing Studies 52 agencies, 148 other non-profit agencies exist 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wazland R Hersey within the region under various financial spon- Y sorship. 12 J13 14 15 16 17 18 Director 19 21 22 23 24 25 Time: 26 28 The College Six consecutive weeks - Monday evenings - one seminar each week from 8:00 to 10:00 p.m. North Shore Community College, Beverly, The Institute would start February 6, 1967, and March Massachusetts, is a comprehensive institution terminate March 13, 1967. S M T W T F S founded in 1965 as part of the Commonwealth Each of the six seminars will be conducted of Massachusetts Regional Community College for two hours, the time distributed as follows: 1 2 3 4 system. This State supported institution offers (all times approximate). programs that lead to the Associate in Arts and 5P2O 7 8 9 10 11 Associate in Science degrees. A student may par- 45 minutes......... . .Presentation b Guest Speaker 12 14 15 16 17 18 ticipate in programs that lead to employment - Y P upon termination of two years of collegiate work 19 21 22 23 24 25 or in programs that parallel the first two years 15 minutes_.............Break for coffee, informal 26 27 28 29 30 31 of work at colleges awarding the Bachelor of Arts dialogue and Bachelor of Science degrees. The College also offers programs in Continuing Education, as 15-30 minutes.........Formal Discussion Groups well as short term Community Service Seminars, Workshops and the like. 30-45 minutes.........General Question Period January 23, 1967 Robert T. Buchanan Asst. Prof., Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Dear Professor Buchanan: In answer to your letter which was sent directly to Mrs Albert Pitcoff of the Salem Planning Board, I will be very happy to have your students consult with me at whatever time they wish. Unfortunately I am confined to the Salem Hospital and at this time do not know when I shall be discharged. However, they can inter- view me at the hospital if I am still a patient, or at my home 54 Ray- mond Road in Saleme My home phone number is 745-0194. I myself am a registered architect, (M. I. T, - 1939) and manyy years ago when I. M. Pei taught at Harvard, I used to go to the School of Design occasionally to. offer criticisms. , Pei incidentally was a classmate of mine in Tech. My brother who is a ,partner .of mine is a graduate of the Department of City Planning at Harvard. It would be of great interest to the Planning Board and tome in particular to see what your students 'ca:i develop for tha areas referred to. I am very interested in this particular project and if I am able, would be delighted to keep up with the progress of this plan, even to the extent of going over to the school to offer comments as the plan is developed. As you state in. your letter, I believe your project would be of some value to us even if it would be a project to be under- taken in the distant future, Very truly yours, JMG:cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, Chairman. ,L- - DEPARTMENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL.OF DESIGN. - - _. ROBINSON HALL, CAMBRIDGE 38. MASS. - - - - January 13, 1967 Mr. Albert Pitcoff 70 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Pitooff: The Department of Landscape Architecture at the .Grad- uate School of Design at . Uarvard University offers .an eight-week course in urban landscape design related to urban renewal. In all of our courses we make an effort to use actual projects. In this way we hope to offer the students a close approximation of professional contact with meaningfuland realistic problems. My conversations with members of the Salem Planning Board and the Salem Redevelopment Authority. (Mr. John Barrett). have indicated our plans to use the Derby Street section of the Salem Harbor _as a renewal .study area, from Derby Wharf to English Street. I am pleased that you feel it would be a worthwhile stu- dent project and that there are no objections to undertaking it at this time:. Four to five graduate students will be working on the project, which will begin February 6, 19670 and conclude with a Final Review on March 31, 1967. . During thee course of work the students will visit the site for photography and notes relating to the visual qualities . of the area. Other than this I would not expect their presence to be noticeable or offensive to the residents in-the area. The Salem. Planning .Board and the Salem Redevelopment Authority will be welcome to the use of any material that the students produce. Sometimes :the Department wishes to keep the original drawings and reports for the, educational files, but you , would be at liberty to photograph or make copies of any material that would be of interest to the city. It would be of great assistance to be able. to call on members of the Salem Planning Board and the Redevelopment Author- ity for participation in our introduction to the area and the re- views at the school of the student solutions. As soon as the de. tailed class schodule. is- established I will be in touch with you regarding this possibility. I will send you a copy of problem . statements and presentation requirements as they are developed. Mr. AlbertPitcoff - 2 January 133 1957 Please let me know if you-have, anv questions. Your cooperation is such _appreciated and I trust that the project will be of real value to your plans for the future of Salem. Sincerely,. Robert T. Buchanan$ Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture . RTB:L / Copy to Mr. John Cray, Jr. V Mr. John Barrett DEPARTMENT OF,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OR DESIGN .. 'ROBINSON HALL, CAMBRIDGE 38, MASS. January 13. 1967 Mr. John-Barrett Salem Redevelopment Authority 32 Derby Square Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Barrett; The Department of Landscape Architecture at the- Grad uate School of Design at Harvard University offers an eight-we-ek course in urban landecape design related to urban renewal. In all of our courses we make an effort to use actual projects. In this way we hope to offer the students a close approximation of professional contact with mean:',ngful-and realistic problems. My conversations with members of the Salem Planning Board (Mr. Albert Pitcoff) -and the Salem Redevelopment Authority have indicated our plans to use the• Derby Street section of the Salem Harbor as a renewal study area, from Derby Wharf to English • Street. I am pleased that you feel it would be a worthwhile stu- dent project and that there are no objections to undertaking it at this time. Four to five graduate students will be working:on the project, which will begin February 6, 1967, and conclude with .a Final Review on` March 31, 1967. During the course of work the students will visit the site for photography and notes relating to the visual qualities of the area. Other than this I would not expect their presence to be noticeable or offensive to the residents in the area. The. Salem Planning Board and the Salem Redevelopment Authority will. be welcome to the use of_ any material that the students produce. Sometimes the Department wishes to keep the original drawings and reports for the educational files, but you would be at liberty to photograph or make •copies of any material that would be of interest to• the city. It would be of great assistance to be able to call on members of the Salem Planning Board and the Redevelopment Author- ity for participation in our introduction to the area and the re- views at the school of the student solutions. .As soon as the de- tailed class schedule is established I will be in touch with you regarding this possibility. I will send you. a •copy of problem • statements and presentation requirements as they are developed. • Mr. John Barrett - 2 January 13i 1967 Please let me blow if you have any questions, Your co8peration is much appreciated and l trust .that the project Will be of real value to your plans for the future of Salem. Sincerely, Robert T, Buchanan Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture RTB:L copy to Mr. John Gray, Jrev Mr. Albert Ptcoff 1 HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE 38, MASSACHUSETTS • GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN DEPARTMENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE January 13 , 1967 Mr. John Gray, Jr. John M. Gray Company 153 Milk Street Boston, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: I tried to contact you by phone , as Chairman of the Salem Planning Board, in the first week of January. You were not available at that time and Mr. Barrett suggested, therefore , .that I speak with Mr. Pitcoff. It is for this reason that my correspondence is directed to him rather than to the Chairman of the Board. I hope that you will be able to visit the school during this project . I will call you at a later date to discuss this possibility. Sincerely, Robert T. Buchanan Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture RTB :L Enclosures • I l ChW Ctg n# jkem, fflassar4usetto 9,� F Pepurtment of Public Porks NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY 6X.IN,CN January 27,1967. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass, Gentlemen: In reply to your request for comments on a proposed release to Salem Acres, Inc. , please be informed that it is my under» standing that your board intended to hold sufficient security to cover any excess maintenance, or necessary changes on the various sewer lines that do not appear to have been constructed properly, for a period of at least five years after completion of the entire project. I refer to statements made at your April 7,1966 meeting. I also understand that, because the developer neglected to follow the approved plans he will be required to prove to the City that all sewers are properly installed, especially as to being straight in line and grade between manholes. This has not • been done.. In view of the'labO.ve, I recommend that serious consideration be given to holding the $36,000. , which is less than 30% of the value of sewers already installed. Regarding the release of lots 1,2,3,9 to 23 and 87 to 97 I have no knowledge, at the present time, as to the degree of completion of the various works in this area. A breakdown of the estimated total value of work required 1s as follows: Street Water San. Water Sewer Rds. Curb. Walks Stone Storm mains sewers serv. serv. bounds sewers Witch Way #2800. $2400. $1200.$1200.$2600.$400.0600. $100. #? 1 Ctu of '�$ttlem, 4Ra65ar fuse#s Department of ?Pix61ic Marks NEAL B. MITCHELL 2 CITY ENOINEEN January 27,1967. Regarding the recently resubmitted plans of Crescent Dr. , Summit St., Witchcraft Rd., Puritan Rd. , Pioneer Cir. and Witch Way. After careful review, I find that at least half of the items listed in my letter of October 18,1966 have not been complied with. I also note that these plans call for the ex- tension of Albion St. , which does not appear to be at all practical, due to necessary steep graAes. This would leave Crescent Dr. a dead-end street without a turnaround area. I recommend that these plans be again returned to the devel- oper for modifications and additions required. Very truly yours, 22x/3. ,y�7: Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer Copy to Atty. George P . Vallis CITY 'OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD The Planning Board will hold a Public Hearing on Thursday, February 2, 1967, at_ 34 Church Street at 7.30 P.M. on the petition of Salem Acres, Inc., and the Salem Planning Hoard for Subdivision of land on and off Ord Street, Witchcraft Road, Sum. mit Street, and Albion Street Extension. Plans of the area are available at the .Planning Board • office, 34 Church Street, Salem, SALEM PLANNING BOARD John M. Gray, Jrw Jan.: 18, 2'5, 1967 Chairman (Charge to: George P. Vallis, Counsel for Salem Acres, Inc., 70 Washington Street, Salem, Mass. ) February 6, 1967 The Planning Services Group, 18 Eliot Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts Atten: Mr. Morton B, Braun. Dear Mr. Braun: Confirming my telephone conversation with you, please consider this your authorization, to gather up bills on proposed legislation, on a time and material basis, and bill us separately. A copy of thelist received by the Board from the Department i of Commerce and development is enclosed. I have checked the bills which would be of interest to the Planning Board. j Very truly yours, JMG:cc F rman E Copy enclosed t s February 14, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on February 2, 19679 it was VOTED: - To refuse endorsement of Form A "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan - 1. Applicant - Paul P. Guy, 15 West Avenue 7 Plan appears to be incomplete; voted to return linen and inform applicant what should appear on plan. for endorsement. Very truly yours, GTM:cc Acting Clerk �S NOW Rcv BOORUM & PLEASE " i i Q CEEp,1IVEaes/ gyp{ �tt� of *aSYlYeNm, �tlasysyar4usetts CITY ,'6 OFFICE ALEM'MASS- 34 (94=4 Street FORM A Tatem, filassar4usetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. 17 Salem, Mass.> ------------------------------- --- The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) __----__ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. �- • 1. Name of Applicant -----------J---WLI L-----hJ L�2/ Ujl---------- ------------------------------- Address ---------- __,C� SS----�---- I&E — -- - 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor_ --- ---- ___ __-_-__ _-___-__ Address ---2- -0----- S - - ----- - -------------- --------------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property/records in ------C`3_S E_X____________________________________Registry . Book __Z__7__'73-------- Page ----//,--4/-------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ----------------.------------------------------------------------------------------------------ St� = 1� %r0r' ------------------------------ a Signature of Owner ---- -)-------- �---`-' �----- • Address ---1--v ---------� ---------------------------------- r • February 14, 1967 Mr. "Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall. . Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on February 20 1967, it was VOTED: - To endorse -"Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan • 1. Applicant - F. John DeSantis,, F.. Paul DeSantis, 18 East Collins St 26 Brimbal Avenue, i Salem, Mass. Beverly, Masse 2. Location and Description - Redivision of property at 63 Bridge Street and rear East Collins Sto i i 3. .Deed of Property recorded in Essex South ,District Registry, Book 3352 Page 9 Very truly yours, CTM:cc 'ct ng MR • C itV of ttlem, f ttssar4 tsetts FEB ,s�� � �� �Ittnxtin$ �ottr� CITSALEM,AASS- Clitg Pull o Anlem, Auzzarflusette FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Febuary---2 -------------19 67--- Salem, Mass.> ------------- r -------------- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not c9yny-�-� stitute a subdivision wirn the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ------4---- t 1k.p L p/00•yG �/ - --- an herewith submits said plan for a determinatioK and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • I. Name of Applicant ......F , John DeSantis F . Paul DeSantis - - - -------------- Address - -------- 18 ast o ins treed----------�b—SiimtiaI�--Avenue---- - Address ________----_Sa_1_e__m._ Mas-sachu_sett_s-------------_Beverly_-,_--Massachus_etts__ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor--------Edwin T-------Brudzynski__ — Address __________________________�60-----La---fayette----Street—,_ Salem,- Massa-ohusetts 3. Deed of property records in _____Ess ex- S o u t h_D i s t r i c t----------Registry Book----3352--------------Page——9 4. Location and Description of Property- ---------------------------------------------------------—--------------------------- _63Bridge Street and Rear East Collins Street -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner ---��1- �J - ------------------ Address -----d�� Signature of Owner,,4_u/wce February 14; 1967 i Mr: Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: At a meeting.'of the City Planning Board held on Febru- ary 2, 19679 it was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan • 14 Applicant - State College at Salem Lafayette Street 2. Location and Description - Southerly on "Right of Way" i as shown ori said plan 2001 ; westerly by land shown as State College 201 ; northerly by land of State College- 2001 ; easterly by Lafa- yette Street 201 ; a release of right of way. 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 4820 Page 251 Very truly yours, I OTM:cc C7 ng T er i • = RECEIVED Cig of *Ulera, gassar4usetts J44 31 1146 Atl'�1 lttnxtiztg Paurb CI? S Off" SALEM(,MASS" (Zug gall '6alem, Answellusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., --------January--40'---------------1967--- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) _it_ - copst totes_e-releasee_of__right_of__way__on_property__conyeyed_tous__by_ aced_dated__September 2r''--1961-"---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ---State_Collegeat-_ Salem_______ _____________ ______ _ ___ - - - - --- ------- Address LafayetteStreet, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ----- ----- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor 3-- F _-- .—Hennessy._- __Civil-- --------Engineer------------------------------------ Address --------------------- -------- - Address _Brookline,_-Massachusetts 3. Deed of property records in -ESsex___South_ District_____________ Registry of Deeds Book----4828-----------Page------251----- 4. Location and Description of Property: SOUTHERLY__On-_"Right__of---Way"-_as _s-hown-----on--- said --------- -- plan two hundred (200.00) feet; WESTERLY By land shown as State College --------------------------------------------- at__Salem onsaid__plan_twenty__520.0)_ feet- NORTHERLY _By _land o-f said ------ -------- - --------- atatQ--Co11e -qe--- ___�a1em__two__hundred__(200.OO}__feetI__EASTERLY_By__Lafayette Street formerly Marblehead Road twenty (20.0) feet. Signature ofAmident • Address ---Lafayette__Streat,__Salem,__Massachusetts February 14, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on February 2, 1967, it was VOTED:, - To endorse"Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan 1. Applicant - Karolina Bakesycki, rear 141 North Street 20 Location and Description - Lot #1 and Lot #2 North Street and Carlyle Place; to transfer Lot #1, re- serving right of way over a 122 strip, and reserv- ing easements over Lot #1 for water, sewer, electric, and telephone wires. 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 2725 Page 218 Very truly yours, GTM3ce ctang Clerk d BOORUM & PEASE " R" I� BOORUM PEASE " " �tT R€CEIYEQ Cttly of ttICItT� 'MassXr4usetts 59 AM '6T VIr mirB pandr CITYSALEW MASS. 0tg Pull 19uleas, mus"Cilusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., -----January---31.7--=......: ........19S7--- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____________ Carlyle__P-lac e--was-_a_way___-in__nsiste nca__when__-tha__subd ivision__contmol-____ law__became__ef f ect-iva---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ------------------------Karol Ina-_Bakszy_cki------------------------------------------------- Address ---------------------------------Bear_--111__Noxtlh__streeh ---Salem------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor------___Edwim-T.__Brn _________ Address -------------------------------- 3. ---.-------------3. Deed of property records in ___$sse-&--South Distg'#cE------------Registry Book----2725------------ Page-----218-------- -------- 4. Location and Description of Property: __The---entire__are_a,__" ats.__#1__anSI__#`.*---is-____-___ awned.--by---applicant- -----Theme---is--a-_Four__family__dwelling--on__l_ _#1----------- an8_a_ wo__ g_ o_t _ __ #2._____Apin_ _desirest-------- #1ell Lotrat __ ___as__ over a12foot str_ig--as_-sl wn.,--- __Qv-er__Lot---#1_f_or_aat®ri,_sewer, and electric and telephone wires. ,(� Signature of Owner -/f_�_�A01--`La-_`_--�r-- /------- 5_CyC 1 Address -----/ ]_'/_-..C ----- P_�Z� --' --sl__Q_!_�-`-5-- --- r • February 17, 1967 Boston Mimeo & Steno. Service, 50 Broad Street, Boston, Mass. 02109 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a draft of proposed Ordinances for the City of Salem; also, enclosed is a sample copy of the format and arrangement to be used in setting up the Ordinances. You will note that each Chapter comes under a separate section and in the case of Chapter 4, there .are many insertions which relate to various parts of the Ordinance. In many instances because of afterthought, the paragraphs, are not in numerical order. Note I have indicated (pg oo.) in each paragraph which should identify the order. Each of these Chapter Sections should have a space. approximately 2" between so that each item may be clearly identified. If you will refer to the sample • copy, I believe you will understand what I mean. I would 'like to have this set up on a back carbon ..suitable for print- ing, the same set-up as you use in our office specifications. I would also like one. carbon copy that I could proof read. Please type the Zoning (Chapter 35 ) changes first, and send'them to us as soon as possible, after which you can type up the Remainder (Chapter 3-28 inclusi•)3) . It might be- well to call me in any event before you start typ- ing as I think they probably look complicated. Call me any time after 10:00 A.M. Unfortunately I have not been in my office for the 'last several weeks due to illness, and I may be contacted at the Salem Hospital, 745-4600, extension 56$. If I am hopefully discharged, you may contact me at my home, 745-0194. All of the charges on this work, including telephone calls, will be made out to the Salem Planning Board. However, do not send your bill yet because there is more material to follow. Sincerely yours, JMG:cc • firman r,ONotrq_ ,. ym Ci'ITt# ofIezn, ttssttcuse## • 9T�Y 304H AM- f6rug, fir_ January 26, 1967 Geralb T_ MrTarihq Air4arl Wnskofnski 34 Church f6treet ,Alfirrf g- Vifco£f 'Salem, j lussuchusefis �RsgmonD �_�fneeueq MAN NTrA Ad CGr $.C4 aFG P� Boston Mimeo & Steno. Service, R1Frr;,ar ?,-,p nsqtJG+f r,4 /'74/P,�c4n�u r ie dLG 50 Broad Street, iw Ja L4iW JZJ cn` oznga - a n rt / IV 4 C Boston, Mass. 02109 Wf�ceGd SNotd;,1� 9plE,ur'd�-Y 1`4 g, + lt°�',f� Atten: Joe or Chris . Enclosed..is a draft of proposed Ordinances for the City of juse'd also enclosed is a sample copy of the format and arrangement to in setting .up the Ordinances. You will note that each Chapter cunder a separate section and in the case of Chapter 4, there areinsertions which relate to various parts of the Ordinance. ac these Chapter Sections should have a space approximately 2" between so that each item may be clearly identified. If you will refer to the sample copy I believe you will understand what I mean. 50-r-aP / of=fu I :would like to h ve this set up on a back carbon suitable for printing, the same as you use in our/specifications. I would also like one carbon copy that I could proof read. Unfortunately I have not been in my office for the last several weeks due to illness and I may be contacted at the Salem Hospital, ,7-##=tM50 Extension 568. If I am hopefully discharged you may contact me at my home, 745-0194. +be6unrw0 rGc.&pfdaw &. c.ac,�x. All of the chargeslr on this w6rk will be made out to,--.the Salem Plan— ning Board. However, do not send your bill yet because there is more material to follow. Sincerely yours, JMG :cc 7 Chairman ryio,C ro4 G aa ,Al C C�ao� a' ) CZ/19 A47'0 '.-41 7 +af 47" aTr-1Hca , 4X7'„Z • QAloctj tcu C 'lv .1, '/o G 1- lc ( r /tq / C� qe b'G ~ 4 t-1oG r C.1c.4 /s�� �N 46, �uKq� I^- 6e..A C ✓ ° � n7' 92r 7y,p 'uC Ra I TO - r r1P1G� dpZo t3A,?ty C as caA r�0 C.9 GL /7'/ C ✓yl 4 y r4l,'74 -4,C%GLZ /0 A f A4 February 24, 1967 ! Mr. Augustine J Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, iSalem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on February 16, 19670 it was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re-. quired" on the followl.ng describedrplan 1. Applicant - Paul P. Guy, 15 West Avenue, Salem, Mass. • ° 2. Location and Description - Land containing 4.090 *square feet, shown ae Lot B on West Avenue 3+ Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry; Book 4.473 Page 166 f Very truly yours, MP:cc -Clerk City of '�$tttem, 'Massar4usetts t¢ag Pau �alem, �flUlassacl�usefis FORM A U u. APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT C:) ovyi OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL UJ in a > 'a File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy v "Jul with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. W Salem, Mass-- -------------------------------Z f J 19- J To fte Pl nning Board: The Undersigned; believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____-______ — ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant ------�A U—Lc------rX::I --------------------------------------------------------------- Address ------j—~------w—�--5- 1 ---------/�----� '--------------------------------------------------------------— 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor---- '-------- ----------------------__________--------------- Address ---------- _---46---------- 3. -------3. Deed of property records in _______FSS E X ---------------Registry Book-----L/--y-rr7 3--------- Page-----J� 4'-------------- g 4. Location and Description of Property: ----- ------11,410Qd__--&4z___e --'-------_---------------------------------- L �Y� o fio s. �o ------ ------------ -------------------- --------------------------------------------------- � ----------- --_ -----------------------------L-- ( " --------- ------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner ,------ Address ---- �t,_a r — February 23, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on February 16,19670 it •was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Na-Re- quired" on the following described plan 1,. Applicant - Roland A. L'Heureux, 14 Pickman Street, Salem, Mass. " • 2. Location and Description - Lot #2, 17 Dearborn Street, corner of Walter Street 3e Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry. Book 3028 Page 233 Very truly yours, MP:cc ZFE er F� `t • ��� - _ M RFC . of salem, FEe 14 8 AM 1? Flanniq Paurb CITY Wt-:�w3 OF ICE SALEM, MASS, �alem, �Iassachusetis FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass-- ------------ A-------------------------19—�17 To the Planning Board: e The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning meaning of the Subdivision Control Law bec use (see Sect. II-A) -------_--- 5: _ �Gs�_`-- ---`nnt---� \y.�oT -latkC----W_n A---�. ` � - - wa �!`� - ---Q--_ ----Oy---- - `�S''--------�_ n_1 herewith submits said plan for a determination,and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required--. / f • 1. Name of Applicant —-------� 0_-J_c7 _ ------------ - ----------------- Address ------------------- -----------l'G k7 Y 4-------5 �-------------sa�/��/!�R S 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor--- r�w1 ____�_____ �_(( �/f!1__ f �__1________________ Address -------- _76_0--------(�dc!__ ._L� �' --��7�'----S':2 P-�Y/_----Ars ---- 3. Deed of property records in ___-�2_,_leM---/_.-----------------------------------Registry Book_362-__2------- Page---2---,3,3------------ 4. Location and Description of Property: --------1.1___ ea_RG �/ h_-__ / ___S�c oF___-�ulo__-Faint kvif6 �1 jr le 2 ----- �z oje t h '�_�_f�i2174 . ---4 n - - ------ ----- ---- - - --- - - ---- - --- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Signature 7er- Address __ ------------ February 21, 1967 Mr, Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Daar Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on February 16, 1967, it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described pian 1, Applicant - Raymond L. Cummings, Trustee of the Loring Realty Trust, 70 Washington Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description - Land containing 7010 square feet situate on the southerly side of Station Road and shown on plan ?is Lot A 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex County South Registry Book 3613 Pa`, e 512 Very truly yours, MP.cc er • BOORUM & PEASE " h R"_C* BOOPUM & PEASE " �" C� planning �Roarb 34 64ure4 free! FORMAalem, assacl?usefis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ------FRbruar_y---13--------------------—19 67--- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ Clause (Cj_ -- - ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ___Baymonsl--- _Cummings_,Trustee_of__the__Loring__Realty__Trust_____ Address ________70_ Washington Street, Salem, Mass. ---------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor----R-oher-t---B—Bomman------------------------------------------------------------------- Address c/o_Ni orn_-Palmer, Inc. 15_Wallis__Street_,- Peabody, Mass. 3. Deed of property records in ----Ea_5_g1c__Sottth__District----------------Registry Book ---3613-------------- Page ---512 - 4. Location and Description of Property: A-_parcel_-of__land_containing__7,040_sq_u51re_feet situate on the southerly___side_-o£---Station_Road_and_shown_aslot A_on__a__plan __ sia�title4�__!'P.�.an__pf_din c�__i n__Sa 1 em_Primer ty__of__Lo r ing_l�es_1 ty_T,rn�t_�ca le_1"=40' Feb,_ 2 1967_Osborn_ PalmerInc_ 15_Wallis_Street1Peabody_________ Signature of Owner ,!-a_ � ✓-�? t �'•y Trustee. • Address _7.0-WaslainSton__Stz_e-a_t}---Salsm,Slaa_s,_----------------- 7 W , d CU O m February 23► 1967 Mr: Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, aalem, Massachusetts De4r Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on February 16, 1967, it1was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired"on the following described plan • �'�. Applicant - Hyman Marcus, 245 Essex Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description - Lot #10 Vinnin Street containing 16836 ± square feet 3, Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry W Book 142 Certificate No. 32777 Reg►d. Land CL Very truly yours, 00PfiP =cc Clerk J Ctv of 'Sakm, 'fflassar4usetts ��e�.. �[rztlxling �uttr� flag Pall Salem, 'fflassacllasetts FORM A w APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT k. OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL cn File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy w = with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of 'w Section II-B. is February 15 , 67 M� Salem, Mass., ---------------------------------- 19-------- To P113ning Board: The ndersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of'his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____________ said Flan herewith submitted showing Lot 10, has a frontage on a public highway of--242 61--feet-,---a-m-A--seid Plaza--is suti>�a3�tet�—to sI�ow saicz Lo€ 10 and--tha_f-rmtage-, --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ----------------- c Hymen - ----hlaruG -------- ----- -------- --------- - -- - --------- -------- 214 Essex Street, Salem, Massachusetts , Address ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ---Schofield Bros. -------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Address _______________48 Park Street, -PramIngham-,---Massachusetts 3. Deed of property records in ----Essex_South_DIS-trict-----_--- Registry ----- Pa -------------- Certificate No_ 3277 Reg' d Land Book 142__ _ Page_____ __ 4. Location and Description of Property: Lot 10 as Shown on Flan of Land in Salem,Mass. ' PP -- - - - - - --- --- - --- --------------------------------- dated February 9 , 1967, Schofield Bros. Civil .Engineers . Beginning at a - - ------- -------- --- --- point at the boundary of land of ine Realty `frust on Vinnin Street, thence running Hort easterly- �79.�I i'ee€ - heaice tia sg- s&--Tu-antng Northwesterly 59.71 feet , thence turning and running southwesterly 100.44 feet ; thence €ariaing anff----runnizag Northwesterly2345�Y5j fWa—V --nr.affce---turning and running Southeasterly 165.94 feet, to the point of beginning. Contain3rg-16-�33F6 a square f esE. ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------- Signature of Owner - -- ---------_____� -_C �----------------- 214 Ess______ Street , Salem, Mass . • Address --------------- ------------------------ March 2, 1967 Boston Mimeo & Steno. Service, 50 Broad Street, Boston, Mass. 02109 Gentlemen: Enclosed are drafts of proposed changes in forms and regula-Aons for subdivision control. Please set these up on a back carbon suitable for printing. • If you have any questions or require additional in- formation, please contact me at my home, 745-0194, as I have been released from the hospital. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman March 9, 1967 Boston Mimeo & Steno. Service, 50 Broad Street, Boston, Mass, 02109 Gentlemen: I am returning the drafts of the proposed amendments to the City of Salem Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. You will note changes I have made on these. It may be necessary to do the Zoning Ordinance again, but the • Building Code changes except for the first and last pages are not as numerous. Please forward the corrected originals and a carbon copy of same to me at my home 54 Raymond Road, Salem. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman • 30 4 Ctv of $atv i, CSL �t'a L(i?ItSP S '�ci.+a�z� ��c`1nTlln� 1721Y�1 Q�ieralL 'di. 1'Tje(Cnrtl!p ��ic!!nel �Jnsk nfnski 3d fl�hicrcl, �trret Albert lbert 33. 11itcoff �n!em, $�nssachn alta R�aj,ntollb �. March 10, 1967 Hon. Kevin B. Harrington, State House, Boston, Massachusetts Dear Senator Harrington: The Salem Planning Board has reviewed the provisions of bills, a list of which is attached, slated for legislation. We feel they are beneficial, and we wish to take the position we are in favor of these bills. We hope that you, as our legal representative, will vote in favor if they appear before your body. We wish to register opposition to the following bills for the reasons stated : H-3315 : - "An act authorizing Cities and Towns to elect a Board of Appeals on Zoning". Because of the political implication of having a board of ap- peal form as a group by elective methods, we feel that the public interest would not be best served. At present, Boards of Appeal in cities are ap- pointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the Council, and with few exceptions consist of people who are well qualified by professional training or their own personal business to judge on matters pertaining to Zoning. We do not wish to infer that persons elected would not have these qualifications. However, we fear the elective method would serve as purely a popularity contest rather than appointing boards who could judge zoning matters in proper perspective. In our opinion, it would be similar to that in some states where Judges are elected. In many instances, this system does not best serve the public. 3-95 : - An act requiring Planning Boards to hold public hearings within thirty days after proposed zoning ordinances or by-laws are filed before the Planning Board '. (Incidentally, in the contents of this bill, the per- iod of time is referred to as TWENTY days. ) We do not feel the provisions of this act would serve in the best public interest because of the limita- tion of thirty days. In the majority of cases most city Planning Boards have usually required research of the physical characteristics and questions pertaining to Law. If such a hearing had to be held within a thirty day • - 2 - limitation, no Planning Board would be able to function properly. In addict. would appear that such a provision would call for a milltitcade of tion it w w d in its other public hearings which would greatly hamper the Planning Boar duties. If a period of time were desirable, we feel that it should be far greater than the thirty days stipulated, or at least one hundred and twenty days. -9_733 ; - "Bill clarifying the appeal provisions under the Subdivision Control Law". We feel that if this bill is approved and made part of the Subdivision Control Law, that it will more or less open the floodgates for the reentering of appeals, and it would also allow the delinquent to appeal in his own good time. We do not think this is a good provision. Very truly yours, JMG:cc CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOt+R.D Copies to Senators and Representatives ' Chairzna •if 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Essex Districts Copies to Planning Boards • SLNATE , . . . c . No. 95 By Mr. McIntyre, a petition of James R. McIntyre for legislation to require planning boards to hold public hearing within thirty days after proposed zoning ordinances or by-laws are filed before the planning board. Mercantile Affairs. (+ll1¢ ( DmmntluleRlltg Df fcaDalat4usetto In the Year ihre Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Sever. AN Ac`r REqURING PLANNING BOARDS TI1 HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS WITHU4 TI{IRTY DAYS AFTER PROPOSED 7,ON'ING ORDINANCES OR BY- LAWS ARE FILED B"-ORE TILE PLANNING BOARD. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Reprmentatives in(reneral . Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follou>8: 1. Section 6 of chapter 40A of the General Laws, as appearing 2 in section 1 of chapter 201 of the acts of 1962, is hereby 3 amended by inserting after the second sentence the following 4 sentence' —" e planning board shall hold a public hearing within hH_ent clays after the proposed zoning ordinances or 6 by-laws are filed before the planning hoard. • PLANNING — S 576 Bill Authorizing the Employment of Special Counsel .on City and Town • Planning Boards H 3173 Bill Relative to the Definition and Requirements of a Master Plan Under the Laws Relative to Municipal Planning SUBDIVISION CONTROL S 534 Bill Clarifying the Procedure to be followed in Modifying, Amending, or Rescinding Approval of Definitive Plans under the Subdivision Control Law H 2240 Bill Defining the Word Lot under the Provisions of the Subdivision Con- trol Law H 3205 Bill Requiring the Underground Installation of Certain Light and Tele- phone Lines in Newly subdivided areas REGIONAL PLANNING H 1969 Bill to Assist and Develop Regional Planning By and Within Counties PLANNING AND ZONING 466 Resolve Providing for a Special Investigation and Study by the Planning Division of the Department of Commerce and Development Relative to the Enabling Legislation for Planning and Zoning By cities, towns, counties, regions and State Agencies H 2621 Resolve Providing for a Special Investigation and Study by the Planning Division of the Department of Commerce and Development Relative to the Enabling Legislation for Planning and Zoning by Cities and Towns H 3032 Bill Authorizing Planning Boards to Grant Exceptions to a Zoning Ordinance or By-law H 4064 Bill Authorizing Cluster Development under the Subdivision Control Law ZONING S 91 Bill Requiring Notice of Issuance of Licenses or Variance in Zoning Be Given to Certain Public Officials and Others S 531 Bill Pertaining to Restrictions upon Land Available for the Construction of Single Family Dwellings S 933 Order Relative to an Investigation and Study by the Legislative Research Council of the Implications of Restricting the Zoning Power to Cities and County Government and Certain Related Matters • ZONING &32 Bill Relative to the Definition of Trailers in Zoning Ordinances or Bylaws H 391 Bill Providing for Reimbursement for Legal Services Incurred in Successful Appeals to the Superior Court from Zoning Board of Appeals Decisions H 1320 Bill Relative to Construction of New and Separate Buildings for Agricultur- al Purposes H 1422 Bill Providing for the Imposition of Criminal Penalties for the Violation of Zoning Ordinances or By-Laws H 3170 Bill Amending the Zoning Enabling Act to Permit Cities and Towns to Pro- hibit use Variances H 3171 Bill Authorizing Cities and Towns to Relate their Zoning Ordinance or By- Law to a Master Plan H 3172 Bill Authorizing Cities and Towns to Amend their Zoning Ordinance or By- Law to Create Planned Development Zoning Districts H 3174 Bill Amending the Zoning Enabling Act to Permit Cities and Towns to Re- quire a three-fourths to Amend a Zoning Ordinance or By-Law when the Planning Board Recommends against the Amendment H 3466 Resolve Providing for an Investigation and Study by a Special Commission • Relative to Zoning Lawq H 3467 Bill Limiting Proceedings by Persons Aggrieved by Zoning Laws and Amend- ments H 3639 Bill Authorizing Planning Boards to Grant Special Permits Under the Zoning Law H 3798 Bill Regulating the Size of Dwelling Lots H 3799 Bill Regulating the Size of Lots for Factory, Industrial or Commercial Activities OUTDOOR ADVERTISING H 811 Bill Requiring the Approval of Cities and Towns Priv to the Issuance of Permits for Signs by the Outdoor Advertising Division H 959 Bill Requiring the Approval of Cities and Towns Prior to the Issuance of Permits for Signs by the Outdoor Advertising Division H 1239 Bill Requiring the Approval of Cities and Towns Prior to the Issuance of Permits for Signs by the Outdoor Advertising Division • OUTDOOR ADVERTISING H 1459 Bill Further Regulating the Issuance of Permits for Billboards, Signs, or Other Advertising Devices by the Outdoor Advertising Board 0460 Bill Requiring Hearings of the Outdoor Advertising Board Relative to Applications for a Permit be Held in the City or Town Filing Objection H 1461 Bill Requiring the Outdoor Advertising Board to Hold Public Hearings Prior to Issuance of a Bili. Board License H 3637 Bill Requiring the Approval of Cities and Towns Prior to the Issuance of Permits for Signs by the Outdoor Advertising Division H 3795 Bill Requiring the Approval of Cities and Towns Prior to the Issuance of a Permit for Outdoor Advertising MISCELLANEOUS S 186 Bill Establishing a Board of Registration of Professional Community Planners S 482 Bill to Include Conservation Land with Park Land as to Takings for High- ways or Public Utilities S 797 Bill Directing the Massachusetts Historical Commission to Prepare Com- prehensive Statewide Historic Surveys and Plans for the Purpose of Qualifying the Commonwealth for Certain Federal Funds 10,16 Bill to Clarify the Provisions for Proof of Existence of a Public Way H 119 Bill to Regulate the establishment, maintenance and operations of Junk Yards Along the Interstate and Primary Systems and to Establish Condi- tions for the Granting of a Junk Dealer License or a Motor Vehicle Junk License H 236 Bill Providing for the Creation and Operation of Metropolitan Service Corporations to Provide and Coordinate Certain Public Services and Functions for Metropolitan Areas H 338 Bill Further Regulating the Filling or Dredging of Certain Wet Areas Bordering Coastal Waters H 1116 Bill Requiring the Fencing of Swimming Pools H 1335 Bill Providing for the Holding of Public Hearings Before City Counciis by a Committee Thereof in Certain Cases • SENA'T'E . . . . . . No. 91 By Mr. Harmon, a petition of Samuel Harmon for legislation to require notice of the issuance of licenses or variance in zoning be given to certain public officials and others. Mercantile Affairs. C114e (ilammanmesltll of A"Sarflitlietts • In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF LICENSES OR VARIANCE IN ZONING BE GIVEN TO CERTAIN PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND OTHERS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 Chapter 40 of the General Laws is hereby amended by in- 2 serting after section 32A the following section: — 3 Section 32B. In any hearing relative to the issuance of 4 a license or permit or the transfer thereof, or of a variance 5 in zoning, in which a public hearing is required, notice of 6 said hearing shall be given to abutters, city councillors, select- 7 men, civic and betterment organizations of the municipality 8 who have registered to receive such notices with the city or 9 town clerk, and members of the general court representing 10 the district involved in such hearing. Any hearing held with- 11 out such notice shall not be valid. SENATE . . . . a . No. 95 By Mr. McIntyre, a petition of James R. McIntyre for legislation to require planning boards to hold public hearing within thirty days after proposed zoning ordinances or by-laws are filed before the planning board. Mercantile Affairs. • Of 4P Tum.mvnwPn1t4 of Mxssar4umlts In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACTRE U ING PLANNING BOARDS TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS WITH THn2TY DAYS AFTER PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY- LAWS ARE FILED BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD. • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 Section 6 of chapter 40A of the General Laws, as appearing 2 in section 1 of chapter 201 of the acts of 1962, is hereby 3 amended by inserting after the second sentence the following 4 sentence: —The planning board shall hold a public hearing 5 within twenty days after the proposed zoning ordinances or 6 by-laws are filed before the planning board. • SENATE No. 186 By Mr. DeNormandie, a petition of Morton B. Brown for legislation to E; establish a board of registration of professional community planners. State Administration. (l 41' (9DUnIttattulralxh of .Mmar4usPffS In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT ESTABLISHING A BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNERS. 0 • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Chapter 13 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by adding after section 68, added by section 1 of 3 chapter 409 of the acts of 1966 under the caption BOARD OF 4 REGISTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY PLAN- 5 NERS the following section: — 6 Section 67. There shall be a board of registration of pro- 7 fessional community planners in this section and in section 8 sixty-eight, called the board. The board shall consist of five 9 members, all of whom shall be residents of the Commonwealth 10 who shall be appointed by the governor. Each member of 11 the 'board shall have a minimum of ten years' experience 12 as defined in section eighty-seven XXX, not including ex- 13 perience credit for education. As the term of office of a 14 member of the 'board expires, his successor, qualified as afore- 15 said, and a registered community planner, shall be appointed 16 by the governor to serve for five years. Members of the board 17 shall hold office until appointment and qualification of their 18 successors. Vacancies shall be filled for the 'balance of any 19 unexpired term, in the same manner as the original appoint- 20 ment. The governor may remove any member of the board 21 for misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance in office, after • 22 hearing and on written charges. Members of the board shall 23 serve without compensation, but shall be entitled to their 2 SENATE—No. 186. L Jan. • 24 actual and necessary traveling and other expenses incurred 25 in the performance of their official duties. 26 The board shall have the power to administer the registra- 27 tion of applicants as professional community planners, to issue 28 a certificate of registration as set forth in section eighty- 29 seven ZZZ of chapter one hundred and twelve, to revoke the 30 certificate of registration of any registrant as set forth in 31 section eighty-seven DDDD of chapter one hundred and 32 twelve, and to promulgate rules and regulations for the ad- 33 ministration and enforcement of sections eight-seven WNW 34 to eighty-seven KKKK, inclusive, of chapter one hundred 35 and twelve, which may be reasonably necessary for the proper 36 performance of their duties, including methods of procedure 37 in processing before the board. The board shall adopt an • 38 official seal for professional community planners and shall 39 also adopt an official certificate of registration. 40 The board shall hold at least two regular meetings each 41 calendar year. The board shall elect annually a chairman, a 42 vice-chairman and a secretary. Special meetings may be 43 called by the chairman. A quorum shall consist of three 44 members. A majority vote of the entire board shall be neces- 45 sary for a decision. At no time shall the vested authority 46 for approving or disapproving registration of an applicant be 47 delegated. 1 SECTION 2. Chapter 112 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by adding after section eighty-seven VVV added by 3 section two of chapter six hundred and four of the acts of 4 nineteen hundred and sixty-three, under the caption 5 REGISTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY PLAN- 6 NERS, the following fifteen sections: — 7 Section 87WWW. The following words and phrases used in 8 sections eighty-seven WWW to eighty-seven KKKK, inclusive, 9 hereinafter referred to as said sections, shall, unless the con- 10 text otherwise requires, have the following meanings: 11 "Professional community planner"means a person registered 12 in accordance with the provisions of this act. A registered • 13 professional community planner may engage in the. prepara- • 1967.] SENATE—No. 186. 3 14 tion of the comprehensive community plan including the pre- 15 paration of planning studies which assist in the preparation 16 or the implementation of the comprehensive community 17 plan. 18 "Comprehensive community plan" means a unified docu- 19 ment of text, charts, graphics or maps, or any combination, 20 designed to portray general, long-range proposals for the 21 arrangement of land uses and which is intended primarily to 22 guide government policy toward achieving orderly and co- 23 ordinated development of the entire community. 24 "Community" means city, town, county, region, metro- 25 politan area, state or combinations thereof. 26 'Board" means the board of registration of professional • 27 community planners established by section sixty-four of chap- 28 ter thirteen. 29 Section 87XXX. Only individual persons shall be granted 30 registration under this act. Every person applying for regis- 31 tration as a professional community planner this act shall: 32 (a) Be of good moral character. 33 (b) Be required to pass a written examination, and when 34 deemed necessary, an oral examination, prescribed by • 35 the board, except as provided by section eight-seven 36 KKKK. 37 (c) Be at least twenty-five years of age. 38 (d) Be a citizen of the United States or have declared his 39 intention of becoming a citizen and taken out his first 40 papers. 41 (e) Have had not less than seven years of planning experi- 42 ence, except as provided in subdivision (f), in the types 43 of work necessary to the preparation or implementa- 44 tion of comprehensive community plans, not less than 45 two years of which shall have been in the United 46 States. 47 (f) A minimum of three years of planning experience, as 48 described in subdivision (e), is mandatory. A maximum • 49 waiver of four years may be allowed for one degree 50 only as follows: 4 SENATE—No. 186. 1 J an. • 51 Doctorate or master's degree in planning, four ,years' credit; 52 Bachelor's degree in planning, three years' credit; 53 Doctorate or master's degree in a related field including, 54 but not limited to, architecture; landscape architecture; civil 55 engineering; sociology; economics; geography; political sci- 56 ence; or public administration, three years' credit; 57 Any other degree in a related field, two years' credit. 58 Section 87YYY. An applicant meeting the above require- 59 ments of section eighty-seven XXX upon payment of the fees 60 required in section eighty-seven ZZZ shall be granted an ex- 61 amination. The examinations Will have special reference to 62 the applicant's knowledge of basic community planning theory, 63 ability to solve practical community planning problems and 64 understanding of professional responsibilities. The 'board shall, • 65 at least once annually, hold examinations in the separate items 66 of its requirements as provided by this section. When ex- 67 aminations are required, they shall be held at such time and 68 place as the board may determine. The board may permit 69 the applicant to take the prescribed examination in two stages. 70 The stages are as follows: 71 (a) The first stage of the examination may be taken after 72 the applicant has three years of experience credit which may • 73 be based on one of the degrees listed in section eight-seven 74 XXX. A candidate failing an examination may apply for re- 75 examination at the expiration of six months after failure of 76 the examination. Satisfactory passage of the first stage of 77 the examination shall be valid for the life of the applicant. 78 The board shall give the applicant an appropriate document 79 declaring this. 80 (b) The second stage of the examination shall be given only 81 after the applicant has completed the required seven years 82 of experience, and has passed the first stage of the examina- 83 tion. It shall test the applicant's ability to apply his training 84 and knowledge to practical problems in the profession and 85 shall further test his understanding of his professional 86 responsibilities. • 87 Section 87ZZZ. Applications for registration shall be on forms • 1967.] SENATE—No. 186. 5 88 prescribed and furnished by the board, shall contain statements 89 made under oath, showing the applicant's education and a sum- 90 mary of his professional work, including a statement from em- 91 ployers as to the type of work the applicant has undertaken. 92 The initial registration fee shall be for one year and shall be 93 sixty dollars, forty dollars of which shall accompany the appli- 94 cation, the remaining twenty dollars to be paid upon issuance of 95 the certificate. If the board denies the issuance of a certificate of 96 registration to any applicant, the initial fee deposited shall be re- 97 tained as an application fee. The fee schedule shall be as follows: 98 (a) One year initial registration $60.00 99 (b) Two year renewal of registration 80.00 • 100 (c) Replacement of lost certificate 10.00 101 (d) Reexamination fee ______ no fee for first reexamination 102 (e) 'Subsequent reexaminations 10.00 103 The board shall issue a certificate of registration upon pay- 104 ment of registration fees, as provided for in this act, to any 105 applicant who has satisfactorily met all the requirements of 106 this act. Certificates of registration shall show the full name 107 of the registrant, shall have a serial, number, and shall be 108 signed by the chairman of the board under seal of the board. • 109 The certificate of registration shall authorize the practice of 110 the applicant as a "professional community planner." Every 111 holder of a certificate of registration shall display it in a con- 112 spicuous place in his principal office, place of business or em- 113 ployment. 114 Section 87AAAA. The board shall keep a record of its 115 proceedings and a register of all applicants for registration, 116 which register shall show (a) the name, age and residence 117 of each applicant; (b) the date of the application; (c) the 118 place of business or employment of the applicant; (d) his 119 educational and other qualifications; (e) whether or not an 120 examination was required; (f) whether the applicant was 121 accepted; (g) whether a certificate of registration was 122 granted; (h) the date of the action of the board; and (i) such • 123 other 'information as may be deemed necessary by the board. 124 The records of the board shall be prima facie evidence of the 6 SENATE—No. 186. [Jan. • 125 proceedings of the 'board set forth therein, and a transcript 126 thereof, duly certified by the secretary of the board shall be 127 admissible in evidence with the same force and effect as if 128 the original were produced. On or before March 15th in each 129 year, the board shall make a report to the governor and to 130 the legislature, setting forth the workings of the board during 131 the period covered by the report, and containing the findings 132 and recommendations of the 'board. 133 Section 87BBBB. The board shall notify every person reg- 134 istered under this act of the date of expiration of his certifi- 135 nate. The notice shall be mailed to the latest address on file 136 with the secretary at least one month in advance of the date 137 of expiration of the certificate. Reinstatement — the fee to • 138 be paid for the renewal of a certificate at any time after 139 one month subsequent to the date of expiration of said certifi- 140 tate shall be increased ten per cent for each month or fraction 141 thereof that reinstatement is delayed. The maximum fee for 142 delayed renewal shall not exceed twice the normal renewal 143 fee. Renewal of registration may be effected at any time 144 within one month after the date of expiration of the certificate 145 by the payment of the required fee. Renewal of registration 146 shall be for a period of two years. The failure on the part . • 147 of the registrant to renew his certificate within one month 148 after the date required by the rules of the board, as prescribed 149 above, shall not deprive such person of the rights of renewal, 150 excepting when the lapse exceeds a period of six years, in 151 which case the board shall review the registrant's qualifica- 152 tions and may require reexamination of the second stage as 153 defined in section eighty-seven YYY. In addition to the 154 maximum fee for delayed renewal, reexamination shall re- 155 quire the standard registration fee. 156 Section 87CCCC. Each registrant hereunder shall upon 157 registration obtain a seal of the design authorized by the 158 board, bearing the registrant's name and the legend "profes- 159 sional community planner." 160 A professional community planner shall place a seal upon 161 his work or the planning work for which he is responsible • 162 with a seal bearing his name. • 1967.1 SENATE—No. 186. 7 163 Section 87DDDD. The board may revoke the certificate 164 of registration of any registrant who is found guilty by the 165 board of either: 166 (a) The practice of any fraud or deceit in obtaining a 167 certificate of registration. 168 (b) Any gross negligence, incompetence or misconduct in 169 the performance of the types of work necessary to the 170 preparation or implementation of comprehensive com- 171 munity plans. 172 Section 87EEEE. Any person may prefer charges against 173 any registrant. The charges shall be in writing, and shall be 174 sworn to by the person making them and shall be filed with • 175 the board. 176 All charges, unless dismissed by the board as unfounded, 177 shall be heard by the board within a reasonable time after 178 the date on which they shall have been preferred. 179 The time and place for said hearing shall be fixed by the 180 board and a copy of the charges, together with a notice of the 181 time and place of hearing, shall be personally served on or 182 mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the 183 last known address of such registrant, at least thirty days • 184 before the date fixed for the hearing. At any hearing the per- 185 son preferring charges shall be present. The accused registrant 186 shall have the right to appear personally and to be represented 187 by counsel of his choice, to cross-examine witnesses appearing 188 against him, and to produce evidence and witnesses in his own 189 defense. 190 If, after such hearing, three or more members of the board 191 vote in favor of finding a violation of the provisions of this act, 192 the board shall revoke the certificate of registration of such 193 professional community planner. 194 The board may reissue a certificate of registration to any 195 person whose certificate has been revoked, provided three or 196 more members of the board vote in favor of such reissuance. 197 Application for the re-issuance of a certificate of registra- • 198 tion shall be made in such a manner as the board may direct, 199 and shall be accompanied by the two-year renewal registration 200 fee of eighty dollars. 8 SENATE—No. 186. [Jan. • 201 Section 87FFFF. The issuance of a certificate of registra- 202 tion by this board shall be evidence that the person named 203 therein is entitled to all the rights and privileges of a regis- 204 tered professional community planner while the certificate 205 remains valid. 206 Section 87GGGG. A roster showing the names and business 207 addresses of all professional community planners shall be pre- 208 pared by the board during the month of February of each year, . 209 commencing in the year following the date on which this law 210 'becomes effective. Copies of this roster shall be placed on file 211 with the secretary of state, and furnished to the public upon 212 request. 213 Section 87HHHH. A person registered under this act may 214 use the title "professional community planner" or "community • 215 planner." 216 Section 871111. No professional community planner shall en- 217 gage in the practice of architecture, engineering or land sur- 218 veying, as defined in chapter 112, unless duly registered as an 219 architect, professional engineer or land surveyor in accord- 220 ance with law. 221 Section 87JJJJ. The board shall be charged with the en- 222 forcement of the provisions of sections eighty-seven WWW to • 223 eighty-seven KKKK inclusive. Any person who uses the title 224 registered professional community planner, when he is in fact 225 not a registered professional community planner, or uses as his 226 own the seal of another, or uses an expired or revoked certifi- 227 cate of registration shall be punished by a fine of not more 228 than five-hundred dollars, or imprisonment for not more than 229 ninety days, or both. 230 Section 87KKKK. Upon application and the payment of the 231 registration fee as provided in section eighty-seven ZZZ, the 232 board shall issue a certificate of registration as a professional 233 community planner to any person who holds a valid certificate 234 of qualification or registration issued to him by propar au- 235 thority of any state or territory or possession of the United 236 States if the requirements for the registration of professional 237 community planners, under which said certificate of qualifica- • 238 tion or registration was issued, do not conflict with the pro- • 1967.] SENATE—No. 186. 9 239 visions of this act and are of a standard not less restrictive k 240 than that specified in this act; and if equal reciprocal privil- 241 eges are granted to registrants of this state. 1 SECTION 3 At any time within two years after this act be- 2 comes effective, the board shall grant, upon application, regis- I 3 tration under this act without examination to any applicant I 4 with at least six years of planning experience in the types of 5 work necessary to the preparation or implementation of corn- 6 pre`ensive community plans, not less than two years of which 7 shall have been in the United States, and of which formal 'f 8 education can count as much as 4 years, according to the pro- 9 visions of section 87XXX. P 1 SECTION 4. This act shall not be construed to affect or pre- 2 vent the practice of any other legally recognized profession, or 3 to prohibit any person from engaging in the practice of plan- 4 ning or use of titles other than registered professional com- ' 5 munity planner. • SENATE . . . . . . No. 482 By Mr, Weeks, a petition of Stuart DeBard for legislation to include con- servation land with park land as to takings for highways or public utilities. The Judiciary. c�l�e C�nmmnnareulfl� n# 91�xss�rkluseffs • In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT TO INCLUDE CONSERVATION LAND WITH PARK LAND AS TO TAKINGS FOR HIGHWAYS OR PUBLIC UTILITIES. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: • 1 Section five of chapter seventy-nine of the General Laws 2 as appearing in the Tercentenary Edition is hereby amended 3 by striking out the third sentence thereof and substituting the 4 following sentence: —"No portion of the land taken for or 5 held by a town as a park under chapter forty-five or for 6 conservation uses including easements and restrictions there- 7 fore under chapter forty shall be taken or used for a public 8 way, canal, railroad or railway, or for altering or widening 9 the same, without the approval of the board in such town 10 having control of such land or interest therein." SENATE . . . No. 531 By Mr, John E. Harrington,,Jr., a petition of the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts,Inc., by Robert D. McPeck,I for legislation relative to restric- tions upon land available for the,constructionof sin sic-family..dwellings! Mer- cantile Affairs. cU,4P (nsmmsnwealth of fKassar4asetts In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT PERTAINING TO RESTRICTIONS UPON LAND AVAILABLE FOR THE !, • CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Sections two of Chapter forty-A of the General 2 Laws is hereby amended by adding the following para- 3 graph: — 4 Subject to the applicable provisions of 'the Sanitary Code 5 relating to the disposal of sanitary-sewage in unsewered areas, • 6 provisions of any ordinance or by-law regulating the use of 7 land on which a single family residential building may be con- 8 structed may require either the width or frontage of the lot, 9 however measured, to be not in excess of one hundred feet, 10 the area thereof not in excess of fifteen thousand square feet, 11 the front yard not in excess of twenty-two percent of the depth 12 of the lot measured from the street line, side yards not in ex- 13 cess of fifteen percent of the width of the lot measured at the 14 building line. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent the 15 voluntary creation by an owner of land of lots providing larger 16 areas, frontages or yards. 1 SECTION 2. The provisions of this act shall apply only to 2 land located at least two hundred feet from a building in ex- 3 istence on the effective date hereof but shall not apply to pub- 4 licly owned land. 1 SECTION 3. Any requirement of any ordinance or 'by-law l SENATE—No. 531. [Jan. 1967. • 2 which, on the effective date of this act, exceeds those set forth 3 in section one shall be deemed to be reduced so as to conform 4 therewith and enforced accordingly. • • • SENATE . . . . . . No. 533 By Mr. Moakley; 'a petition of the Home Builders Association of Massachu- setts, Inc., by Robert D. McPeck, for legislation to clarify the appeal provi- sions under the subdivision control law. • 014r Tommonwealfll of Mawar4ulieffs In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT CLARIFYING THE APPEAL PROVISIONS UNDER THE SUBDIVI- SION CONTROL LAW. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 Section eighty-one-BB of Chapter forty-one of the General 2 'Laws is hereby amended by adding the following para- 3 graph: — 4 Failure of an applicant to appeal from a decision approving 5 a plan within the twenty-day period set forth in this section 6 shall not bar an applicant from challenging the reasonable- 7 ness of any rule or regulation affecting the plan. SENATE . . . . . . No. 534 By Mr. Moakley, a petition of the Home Builders Association of Massachu- setts, Inc., by Robert D. McPeck, for legislation to clarify the procedure to be followed in modifying, amending or rescinding approval of definitive plans under the subdivision control law. Mercantile Affairs. Cllr (Iommonn rtiff4 of Mmar4norull In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT CLARIFYING THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN MODIFYING, AMENDING OR RESCINDING APPROVAL OF DEFINITE PLANS UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 Section eighty-one-X of chapter forty-one is hereby amended 2 by adding thereto the following paragraph: — 3 No register of deeds or recorder of the Land Court shall 4 accept for record a notice of modification, amendment or re- 5 scission of approval of a plan of a subdivision without a certi- 6 ficate executed by the clerk of the city or town that no notice 7 of appeal was received during the twenty days after receipt 8 and recording of notice from the planning board of modifica- 9 tion, amendment or rescission of approval or, if an appeal was 10 taken, that a final decree has been entered by the court sus- 11 taining the decision of the planning board. SENATE . . . . . . No. 797 By Mr. Ames, a petition of Kevin H. White, Oliver F. Ames, Kevin B. Harrington and members of the House of Representatives for legislation to direct the Massachusetts Historical Commission to prepare comprehensive statewide historic surveys and plans for the purpose of qualifying the Com- monwealth for certain federal funds. State Administration. tater Tommunwraltll of assachuseris In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT DIRECTING THE MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION TO PREPARE COMPREHENSIVE STATEWIDE HISTORIC SURVEYS AND PLANS FOR THE PURPOSE OF QUALIFYING THE COMMONWEALTH FOR • CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 For the purpose of qualifying the commonwealth to receive 2 federal funds available under the provisions of Public Law 89- 3 665 of 1965 which provides for grants for projects having as 4 their purpose the preservation for public benefit of properties 5 that are significant in American history, architectures, archeo- 6 logy, and culture, the Massachusetts historical commission is 7 hereby authorized and directed to prepare comprehensive 8 statewide historic surveys and plans in accordance with criteria 9 established by the Secretary of the Interior. I ° I HOUSE . . . . . . No. 116 Accompanying the third recommendation of the Department of Public works (House,No. 113).Highways and Motor Vehicles. cbe commontueaub of comarbuonto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE PROVISIONS FOR PROOF OF EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC WAY. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as • follows: 1 Chapter 233 of the General Laws is hereby amended by 2 striking out section 79F, as inserted by chapter 476 of the 3 acts of 1952, and inserting in place thereof the following 4 section:- 5 Section 79F. A certificate by the secretary of the department 6 of public works commission in the case of a state highway, 7 or by a city or town clerk in the case of a city or town way, 8 that a particular way is a public way as a matter of record 9 shall be admissible as prima facie evidence that such a way 10 is a public way. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 119 Accompanying the sixth recommendation of the Department of Public Works (House,No. 113).Highways and Motor Vehicles. cbe commonweaub of masmafbusetts In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT TO REGULATE THE ESTABLISHMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF JUNKYARDS ALONG THE INTERSTATE AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS AND TO ESTABLISH CONDITIONS FOR THE GRANTING OF A JUNK DEALER LICENSE OR A MOTOR VEHICLE JUNK LICENSE. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: • 1 SECTION 1. The General Laws are hereby amended by in- 2 serting after chapter 140 the following chapter:- 3 CHAPTER 140A 4 .JUNKYARD CONTROL 5 Section 1. The following terms as used in this chapter shall, 6 unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context, 7 have the following meanings: 8 (a) The term "junk" shall mean old scrap copper, brass, 9 roe rags, batteries er, trash rubber debris waste P , s g , , aPP , or 10 junked, dismantled, or wrecked automobiles, or parts thereof, :.l 11 iron, steel, and other old or scrap ferrous or nonferrous 12 material. 13 (b) The term "automobile junkyard" shall mean any 14 establishment or place where one or more unserviceable, 15 discarded, worn out or junked automobiles, or bodies, engines, 16 tires, parts or accessories are gathered together. 17 (c) The term "junkyard" shall mean an establishment or 18 place of business which is maintained, operated, or used , Amok 2 HOUSE —No. 119. [Jan. • 19 for storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the main- 20 tenance or operation of an automobile junkyard and the 21 term shall include garbage dumps and sanitary fills. 22 (d) "Interstate system" means that portion of the national 23 system of interstate and defense highways located within this 24 state, as officially designated or as may hereafter be so des- 25 ignated, by the department of public works, and approved 26 by the Secretary of Commerce, pursuant to the provisions 27 of title 23, United States code, "Highways." 28 (e) "Primary system" means that portion of connected 29 main highways, as officially designated, or as may hereafter 30 be so designated, by the department of public works, and 31 approved by the Secretary of Commerce, pursuant to the 32 provisions of title 23, United States code, "Highways." 33 (f) "Department of Public Works" shall mean the de- 34 partment of public works of the commonwealth. 35 Section 2. No person, firm, corporation or association shall 36 establish, operate or maintain a junkyard, any portion of 37 which is within one thousand feet of the nearest edge of the 38 right-of-way of any interstate or primary highway, except 39 the following: 40 (a) Those which are screened by natural objects, plant- • 41 ings, fences, or other appropriate means so as not to be 42 visible from the main-traveled way of the system, or other- 43 wise removed from sight. 44 (b) Those located within areas which are zoned for indus- 45 trial use under authority of law. 46 (c) Those located within unzoned industrial areas, which 47 areas shall be determined from actual land uses and defined 48 by regulations to be promulgated by the commissioner of 49 public works. ' 50 (d) Those which are not visible from the main-traveled 51 way of the system. 52 Section S. Any junkyard lawfully in existence on the effec- 53 tive date of this act or which is or may be lawfully estab- 54 lished along any highway which is hereafter made a part 55 of the interstate or primary systems and which has been so 56 established before the inclusion of such highway within the 57 interstate or primary systems and which is within one thou- 58 sand feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way and visible R', 1967.1 HOUSE —No. 119. 3 `3 59 from the main-traveled way of any highway on the inter- 60 state or primary system, shall be screened, if feasible, by 61 the department of public works at locations on the highway 62 right-of-way or in areas acquired for such purposes outside 63 the right-of-way so as not to be visible from the main-traveled 64 way of such highways. 65 Section 4. The department of public works shall have the 66 authority to promulgate rules and regulations governing the 67 location, planting, construction and maintenance, including 68 the materials used in screening or fencing required by this 69 chapter. 70 Section 5. When the department of public works deter- 71 mines that the topography of the land adjoining the highway 72 will not permit adequate screening of such junkyards or the 73 screening of such junkyards would not be economically fea- 74 sible, the department of public works may acquire by pur- 75 chase or otherwise or take by eminent domain under chapter 76 seventy-nine such land or interests in land as it deems neces- 77 sary to secure the relocation, removal or disposal of the junk- 78 yards. The department shall pay the costs of such relocation, ? • 79 removal or disposal as approved by said department. When 80 the department of public works determines that it is in the 81 best interests of the commonwealth, the department may ac- 82 quire by purchase or otherwise or take by eminent domain 83 under chapter seventy-nine such land or interests in land as d 84 may be necessary to provide adequate screening of such 85 junkyards. 86 Section 6. The commissioner of the department of public 87 works or an agent authorized by said commissioner may at 88 any time enter upon any premises used by any person licenses 89 under sections fifty-four or fifty-nine of chapter one hundred 90 and forty of the General Laws for the purpose of carrying 91 on his licensed business to ascertain if he is conducting such 92 business in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. 93 Section 7. A licensee under sections fifty-four or fifty-nine 94 of chapter one hundred and forty of the General Laws, or 95 any other person in charge of the licensed premises, who re- 96 fuses to admit to the licensed premises an officer or agent 97 authorized to enter said premises under section six of this 98 chapter or any person who wilfully hinders, obstructs or 1 r 4 HOUSE —No. 119. [Jan. 99 prevents said authorized officer or agent from entering the j 100 premises or from making the examination authorized in 101 the preceding section, shall be punished by a fine of not more 102 than two hundred dollars. 103 Section 8. Junkyards which do not conform to the require- 104 ments of this chapter shall be deemed nuisances. The depart- 105 ment of public works may make application to the superior 106 court in the county in which junkyards established or main- 107 tained in violation of this chapter may be located for an 108 injunction to abate such nuisances. 109 Section 9. It shall be a misdemeanor to operate or maintain 110 a ,junkyard in violation of this chapter except those junk- 111 yards lawfully in existence on the effective date of this act. 112 It shall be the duty of the state police and the police of 113 the cities and towns to enforce this chapter, and any persons, 114 firm, corporation or association violating this section shall, 115 upon conviction of the fust offense, be punished by a fine 116 of not less than fifty dollars nor more than one hundred 117 dollars, or by imprisonment for not less than ten days nor 118 more than thirty days, or both such fine and imprisonment, 119 and shall for a second or subsequent conviction be fined not 120 less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred 121 dollars, or by imprisonment for not less than thirty days 122 nor more than six months, or by both such fine and imprison- 123 ment; providing, however, that any automobile junkyard 124 violating the provisions of this chapter and of section sixty- s 125 eight of chapter one hundred and forty shall be prosecuted 126 in accordance with the provisions of said section sixty-eight 127 and upon conviction be subject to the penalty provided in 128 that section. 129 Section 10. The department of public works is hereby au- 130 thorized to enter into agreements with the Secretary of Com- 131 merce of the United States as provided by title 23, United 132 States code, relating to the control of junkyards in areas 133 adjacent to the interstate and primary systems, and to take 134 action in the name of the commonwealth to comply with 135 the terms of such agreement. 136 Section 11. For carrying out the purposes and provisions 137 of this chapter and of Title II of the federal "Highway Beauti- 138 fication Act of 1965," the department may expend any funds 1967.1 HOUSE—No. 119. 5 139 made available for the laying out, construction, reconstruc- 140 tion, resurfacing, relocation or improvement of highways not- 141 withstanding any provision of law to the contrary. 1 SECTION 2. Chapter 140 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by inserting after section 54 the following sections:- 3 Section 54A. No license shall be granted under section fifty- 4 four for an automobile junkyard, as defined in section one of 5 chapter one hundred and forty A,unless: 6 (a) it is to be operated and maintained entirely within a 7 building; or unless 8 (b) it is to be operated and maintained exclusively for 9 the purpose of salvaging the value as scrap of the material 10 collected, as opposed to reselling parts to be used for the 11 purpose for which they were orginally manufactured, and is 12 to be located in a built-up industrial area, or contiguous to a 13 railroad siding, or on or contiguous to docking facilities; or 14 unless 15 (c) itis: 16 (1) more than one thousand feet from the nearest edge of 17 any highway on the interstate or primary system. • 18 (2) more than six hundred feet from any other state high- 19 way; and i20 (3) more than three hundred feet from any park, bathing 21 beach, playground, school, church or cemetery and is not 22 within ordinary view therefrom; and 23 (4) screened from view either by natural objects or well- 24 constructed and properly maintained fences at least six feet 25 high acceptable to said city or town and in accordance with 26 the regulations as promulgated by the department of public E 27 works and as specified on said license. 28 Section 54B. It shall be a misdemeanor to operate or main- 29 tain an automobile junkyard in violation of the provisions 30 of section fifty-four A. 31 It shall be the duty of the state police and the police of . 32 the cities and towns to enforce this section, and any person 33 violating this section shall, upon conviction for the first 34 offense, be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars 35 nor more than one hundred dollars, or for imprisonment for 36 not less than ten days nor more than thirty days, or by both i 6 HOUSE—No. 119. [Jan. 37 such fine and imprisonment, and shall for a second or sub- 38 sequent conviction be fined not less than one hundred dollars 39 nor more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment for 40 not less than thirty days nor more than six months, or by 41 both such fine and imprisonment. 1 SECTioN 3. Chapter 140 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by inserting after section 59 the following sections:- 3 Section 59A. No license shall be granted under section 4 fifty-nine to a person within class 3 as defined in section 5 fifty-eight,unless: 6 (a) it is to be operated and maintained entirely within 7 a building; or unless 8 (b) it is to be operated and maintained exclusively for the 9 purpose of salvaging the value as scrap of the material col- 10 lected, as opposed to reselling parts to be used for the purpose 11 for which they were originally manufactured, and is to be 12 located in a built-up industrial or commercial area, or con- 13 tiguous to a railroad siding, or on or contiguous to docking 14 facilities; or unless 15 (c) itis: • 16 (1) more than one thousand feet from the nearest edge of 17 any highway on the interstate or primary system. 18 (2) more than six hundred feet from any other state high- 19 way; and 20 (3) more than three hundred feet from any park, bathing 21 beach, playground, school, church or cemetery and is not 22 within ordinary view therefrom; and 23 (4) is screened from view either by natural objects or well- 24 constructed and properly maintained fences at least six feet 25 high and in accordance with regulations as promulgated by the 26 department of public works and as specified on said license. 27 Section 59B. It shall be a misdemeanor to operate or main- 28 tain premises of licensees within class 3 as defined in sec- 29 tion fifty-eight in violation of the provisions of section fifty- 30 nine A. 31 It shall be the duty of the state police and the police of 32 the cities and towns to enforce this section, and any person 33 violating this section shall, upon conviction for the first I i • 1967.1 HOUSE—No. 119. 7 34 offense, be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars 35 nor more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment for 36 not less than ten days nor more than thirty days, or by both 37 such fine and imprisonment, and shall for a second or sub- 38 sequent conviction be fined not less than one hundred dollars 39 nor more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment for 40 not less than thirty days nor more than six months, or by 41 both such fine and imprisonment. i 1 SECTION 4. The provisions of subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) 1, I. 2 (c) 2 and (c) 3 of sections fifty-four A and fifty-nine A of 3 chapter one hundred and forty shall not apply to any auto- 4 mobile junkyard or premises licenses within class 3 as defined 5 in section fifty-eight of chapter one hundred and forty exist- 6 ing and having a valid license pursuant to section fifty-four 7 or section fifty-nine of chapter one hundred and forty of the 8 General Laws on the date of enactment of this act. 1 ' SECTION 5. Nothing in this act shall be construed to abro- 2 gate or affect the provisions of any lawful ordinance, regula- • 3 tion or resolution, which are more restrictive than the pro- 4 visions of this act. 1 SECTION 6. The provisions of this act are severable, and if 2 any of its provisions shall be held to be unconstitutional by 3 any court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of such court 4 shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions. 1 SECTION 7. All other general or special laws, or part thereof, 2 inconsistent herewith are hereby declared to be inapplicable 3 to the provisions of this act. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 232 By \Ir. Grimaldi of Springfield, petition of James L. Grimaldi for legislation relative to the definition of trailers in zoning ordinances or by-laws. Mercantile Affairs. Cite eommoutuealtb of ivao0arbuoeuo In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT RELATIVE TO THE DEFINITION OF TRAILERS IN ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY-LAWS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 4 of chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by adding at the end the following paragraphs:— 3 A zoning ordinance or by-law may provide for the following • 4 definitions:— 5 (a) A "Travel Trailer" is a vehicular, portable structure 6 built on a chassis, designed to be used as a temporary dwelling 7 for travel, camping, recreational and vacation uses, and when 8 equipped for the road shall have a body width not exceeding 9 eight feet and which shall be eligible to be licensed or registered 10 and insured for highway use. 11 (b) A "Pick-up Coach" or "Pick-up Camper" is a structure 12 designed primarily to be mounted on a pick-up or truck chassis 13 and with sufficient equipment to render it suitable for use as a 14 temporary dwelling for travel, camping, recreational and vaca- 15 tion uses, and which shall be eligible to be licensed or registered 16 and insured for highway use. 17 (c) A "Motorized Camper" is a portable dwelling designed 18 and constructed as an integral part of a self-propelled vehicle 19 to be used as a temporary dwelling for travel, camping, recrea- 20 tional and vacation use and which shall be eligible to be licensed 21 or registered and insured for highway use. 22 (d) A "Tent Trailer" is a canvas; folding structure, mounted 23 on wheels to be used as a temporary dwelling for travel, camping, • 2 HOUSE —No. 232. [Jan. 1967. 24 recreational and vacation uses, and which is eligible to be li- 25 tensed or registered and insured for highway use. 26 (e) A "Mobile Home" is a movable or portable dwelling built 27 on a chassis, connected to utilities, and designed without a 28 permanent foundation for year-round living. 29 Said zoning ordinance or by-law may also provide that any 30 owner of camping and recreational equipment defined under 31 clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d), but not including clause (e) may 32 park or store such equipment on private residential property 33 subject to the following conditions:— 34 (a) At no time shall such parked or stored camping and recre- 35 ational equipment be occupied or used for living, sleeping. or 36 housekeeping purposes. 37 ,(b) If the camping or recreational equipment is parked or 38 stored outside of a garage, it shall be parked or stored to the 39 rear of the front building line of the lot. 40 (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-paragraph (b), 41 camping and recreational equipment may be parked anywhere 42 on the premises for loading or unloading purposes. • HOUSE No. 338 By Mr. Brett of Quincy, petition of Joseph E. Brett for regulating further I! the filling or dredging of certain wet areas bordering coastal waters. Harbors and Public Lands. i Cbe Commonmea[tt of Maooaftoetto ! In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT FURTHER REGULATING THE FILLING OR DREDGING OF CERTAIN " WET AREAS BORDERING COASTAL WATERS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in fGeneral Court assembled; and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Chapter 130 of the General Laws is hereby amended by 2 striking out section 27A, as most recently amended by 3 chapter 375 of the acts of 1965, and inserting in place thereof . 4 the following section:- 5 Section 27A. No person shall remove, fill or dredge any 6 bank, flat, marsh, meadow or swamp bordering on coastal 7 waters without written notice of his intention to so remove, 8 fill or dredge to the board of selectmen in a town or to the 9 city council in a city, to the state department of public works, 10 and to the director of marine fisheries. It shall contain, in 11 substantial detail, the nature of the work proposed. The 12 selectmen or, in the case of a city, the city council shall hold a 13 hearing on said proposal within thirty days of the receipt of 14 said notice, notice of which hearing shall be given by them by 15 publication at least ten days prior to the date of said hearing 16 in a newspaper published in such town or city, or if there be 17 no newspaper published in such town or city, then in a 18 newspaper published within the county, and shall notify by li 19 mail at least ten days prior to the date of said hearing the 20 person intending to do such removing, filling or dredging, the 21 department of public works and the director, of the time and 22 place of said hearing. The cost of such publication of notice II f E � 2 HOUSE—No. 338. [Jan. • 23 shall be borne by the person filing the notice of intention to 24 so remove, -fill or dredge. The approval and disapproval and 25 the decision of the board of selectmen or city council shall be 26 transmitted, in writing, to such person within seven days of 27 said hearing and shall include any special conditions which it 28 may wish to impose. The selectmen or city council, as the 29 case may be, may recommend the installation of such 30 bulkheads, barriers or other protective measures as may 31 protect the public interest. If the department of public works 32 finds that such proposed removing, filling or dredging would 33 violate the provisions of sections thirty and thirty A of` 34 chapter ninety-one, it shall proceed to enforce the provisions 35 of said sections. If the area on which the proposed work is to 36 be done contains shellfish or is necessary to protect marine 37 fisheries, the said director may impose such conditions on said 38 proposed work as he may determine necessary to protect such 39 shellfish or marine fisheries, and work shall be done subject 40 thereto. 141 Any person aggrieved by a decision of the board of 42 selectmen or city council, whether or not previously a party { 43 to the proceeding, or any municipal officer or board, may 44 appeal to the superior court for the county in which the land • 45 concerned is situated, by filing a bill in equity within twenty 46 days after the decision has been filed in the office of the city 47 or town clerk. Notice of the filing with a copy of the bill in 48 equity shall be given to such city or town clerk so as to be 49 received within such twenty days. The bill shall allege that 50 the decision exceeds the authority of the board of selectmen 1 51 or city council and any facts pertinent to that issue, and shall 52 contain a prayer that the decision be annulled. There shall be 53 attached to the bill a copy of the decision appealed from, 54 bearing the date of filing thereof, certified by the city or town 55 clerk with whom the decision was filed. 56 Where the bill is filed by someone other than the original 57 applicant, appellant or petitioner, such original applicant,, 58 appellant or petitioner and all the members of the board of 59 selectmen or of the city council shall be named as parties 60 respondent with their addresses. To avoid delay in the 61 proceedings, instead of the usual service of process on a bill in 62 equity, the plaintiff shall within fourteen days after the filing 1967.1 HOUSE —No. 338. 3 63 of the bill in equity give written notice thereof, with a copy 64 of the bill by delivery or certified mail to all respondents, 65 including the members of the board of selectmen or of the 66 city council and shall, within twenty-one days after the entry 67 of the bill file with the clerk of the court an affidavit that 68 such notice has been given. If no such affidavit is filed within 69 such time the bill shall be dismissed. No answer shall be 70 required but an answer may be filed and notice with a copy 71 and an affidavit of such notice given to all parties as above 72 provided within seven days after the filing of the answer. 73 Other interested persons may be permitted to intervene, upon 74 motion. The clerk of the court shall give notice of the hearing 75 as in other cases without jury, to all parties, whether they 76 have appeared or not. The court shall hear all evidence 77 pertinent to the authority of the board of selectmen or of the 78 city council and determine the facts, and, upon the facts as so 79 determined, annul such decision if found to exceed the 80 authority of such board of selectmen or of the city council, or 81 make such other decree as justice and equity may require. 82 The foregoing remedy shall be exclusive, but the parties 83 shall have all rights of appeal and exception as in other f . 84 equity cases. 85 Whoever violates any provision of this section shall be 86 punished by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars nor 87 more than five thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not 88 more than six months, or both, and the superior court shall 89 have jurisdiction in equity to restrain a continuing violation 90 of this section. 91 This section shall not affect or regulate the ordinary and 92 usual work of any mosquito control project operating under 93 chapter two hundred and fifty-two, or under the provisions 94 of a special act. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 391 By Mr. Brett of;Quincy, petition of Joseph E.Brett that provision be made for reimbursement for legal services incurred in successful appeals to the Superior Court from zoning board of appeals' decisions. Mercantile Affairs. CIbe ¢CommontneaItb of (PR00aftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES INCURRED IN SUCCESSFUL APPEALS TO THE SUPERIOR COURT • FROM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS' DECISIONS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The fourth paragraph of section 21 of chapter 40A of the 2 General Laws, as appearing in section 1 of chapter 199 of the 3 acts of 1957, is hereby amended by adding at the end the fol- 4 lowing sentence:—As used in this paragraph, costs shall in- 5 elude fees paid an attorney engaged to prosecute the appeal. J HOUSE No. 811 Iiy Mr. Perrault of Westford, petition of Felix R. Perrault for legislation to re- quire the approval of cities or towns prior to the issuance of permits for signs by the Outdoor Advertising Division. Mercantile Affairs. CDC Commontuealtb of Waaaftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTIS- ING DIVISION. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The first sentence of section 29A of chapter 93 of the Gen- 2 eral Laws, as appearing in section 5 of chapter 584 of the acts 3 of 1955, is hereby amended by adding after the word "town", 4 in line 9, the words:— and only if the city council or board 5 of selectmen notify the board that it approves the issuance of G such permit. 49 HOUSE . . . . . . No. 959 By Mr.Bly of Saugus, petition of Belden G. Bly, Jr.,for requiring the approval of cities or towns prior to the issuance of permits for signs by the Outdoor Adver- tising Division. Mercantile Affairs. ebe ¢ommontveaub of maosatfbasetto Tn the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DIVISION. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The first sentence of section 29A of chapter 93 of the General 2 Laws, as appearing in section 5 of chapter 584 of the acts of 3 1955, is hereby amended by adding after the word "town", in 4 line 9, the words:—and only if the city council or board of 5 selectmen notify the board that it approves the issuance of such 6 permit. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 1116 By Mr. Hollis of Braintree, petition of Herbert B. Hollis and another for requiring permanent-type swimming pools to be enclosed by fences. Public Safety. Che Commontuealtlb of 60ao0aftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING THE FENCING OF SWIMMING POOLS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Chapter 271 of the General Laws is hereby amended 2 inserting after section 48 the following section:- 3 Section 49. Every person or governing body owning land 4 on which there is situated an artificial swimming pool 5 containing twenty-four inches or more in depth of water, at 6 any point, shall erect and maintain thereon an adequate 7 enclosure either surrounding the property or pool area, 8 sufficient to make such a body of water inaccessible to small 9 children. Such enclosure, including gates therein, must be not 10 less than four feet above-the underlying ground; all gates 11 must be self-latching with latches placed four feet above the 12 underlying ground or otherwise made inaccessible from the 13 outside to small children. A pool cover or other protective 14 device approved by the governing body may be used so long 15 as the degree of protection afforded by the alternate devices 16 or structures is not less than the protection offered by the 17 enclosure, gate and latch described herein. 18 Whoever violates the provisions of this section shall be 19 punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars. HOUSE No. 1239 By Mr. Dolan of Ipswich, petition of the Massachusetts Selectmen's Associ- ation, Inc., for requiring the approval of cities and towns prior to the issuance of permits for signs by the Outdoor Advertising Division. Mercantile Affairs. cbe ¢ommonwealttb of mimaetwato In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. • AN ACT REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTIS- ING DIVISION. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The first sentence of section 29A of chapter 93 of the General 2 Laws, as appearing in section 5 of chapter 584 of the acts of 3 1955, is hereby amended by adding after the word "town", in 4 line 9, the words:—and only if the city council or board of 5 selectmen notify the board that it approves the issuance of such 6 permit. HOUSE No. 1320 By Mr. Sehlosstein of Warren, petition of the Massachusetts Farm Bureau Federation for legislation relative to construction of new and separate buildings for agricultural purposes.Agriculture. Che ¢ommontueattb of 9oasoaftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT RELATIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF NEW AND SEPARATE BUILD- INGS FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as • follows: 1 Section 5 of chapter 40A of the General Laws as most 2 recently amended by chapter 340 of the acts of 1962 is 3 hereby further amended by inserting after the word "ex- 4 pansion" as it first appears in the last sentence the follow- s ing:—including new and separate structures so that said 6 sentence shall read as follows:—Such an ordinance or by- 7 law may regulate non-use of non-conforming buildings and 8 structures so as not to unduly prolong the life of non- 9 conforming uses; provided, that no such ordinance or by-law 10 shall so regulate the non-use of non-conforming land used for 11 agriculture, horticulture or floriculture where such non-use 12 has existed for less than five years; and provided, further, 13 that no such ordinance or by-law shall prohibit the altera- 14 tion, rebuilding or expansion including new and separate 15 structures within applicable setback requirements of non- 16 conforming buildings, except greenhouses located in resi- 17 dential areas, or the expansion of land, used primarily for 18 agriculture,'horticulture or floriculture. a HOUSE . . . . . . Ilio. 1422 By Mr. Cole of Lexington, petition of Edward W. Brooke, Albert A. Gammal, Jr., and Lincoln P. Cole, Jr., relative to the imposition of criminal penalties for the violation of zoning ordinances or by-laws. The Judiciary. cbe ¢ommontoealtb of maooaebuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY-LAWS. • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 22 of chapter 40A of the General Laws, as appearing 2 in section 2 of chapter 368 of the acts of 1954,is hereby amended 3 by inserting before the first paragraph:— 4 Cities and towns may provide by ordinance or by-law for the 5 imposition of a penalty for the violation of a zoning ordinance 6 or by-law adopted pursuant to this chapter which shall be a fine 7 of not more than one hundred dollars for each such violation, 8 which may be recovered on complaint before a district court 9 and shall enure to the city or town or to such uses as it may 10 direct. • HOUSE . . . . . . No. 1459 By Mr. Curtiss of Sheffield, petition of Sidney Q. Curtiss for regulating further the issuance of permits for billboards, signs or other advertising devices by the Outdoor Advertising Board. Mercantile Affairs. aCbe commontuealtb of ep wwatbuwettw In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT FURTHER REGULATING THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR . BILLBOARDS, SIGNS OR OTHER ADVERTISING DEVICES BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING BOARD. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The first sentence of section 29A of chapter 93 of the General 2 Laws, as appearing in section 5 of chapter 584 of the acts of 3 1955, is hereby amended by inserting after the word "town", 4 in line 10, the words:—and ten days prior notice to the ob- 5 jetting city or town of the decision of the board to grant such 6 permit. • HOUSE . . . . . . No. 1460 By Mr.Curtiss of Sheffield,petition of Sidney Q.Curtiss that the Outdoor Adver- tising Board be required to bold hearings on applications for permits in the city or town where objections thereto have been filed. Mercantile Affairs. cite ¢ommontueaub of efnoarbuonto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING HEARINGS OF THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING BOARD • RELATIVE TO APPLICATIONS FOR A PERMIT BE HELD IN THE CITY OR TOWN FILING OBJECTION. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 29A of chapter 93 of the General Laws, as inserted 2 by section 5 of chapter 584 of the acts of 1955,is hereby amended 3 by inserting at the end thereof the following sentence:—Any 4 hearing held by the board under the provisions of this section 5 shall be held in the city or town filing the objection if requested 6 by the city council of said city or the selectmen of said town. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 1461 By Mr. Curtiss of Sheffield, petition of Sidney Q. Curtiss that the Outdoor Ad- vertising Board be required to hold public hearings prior to the issuance of bill- board licenses. 1VIereantile Affairs. Cje commonmealtb of 9vao0aftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING BOARD TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BILLBOARD LICENSE. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in • General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 29 of chapter 93 of the General Laws is hereby amended 2 by striking out the third sentence, as most recently amended by ter 584 of the acts of 1955 and inserting in 3 section 4 of chap g Place 4 thereof the following sentence:—No permit,whether permanent 5 or temporary, for a billboard, sign or other advertising device 6 shall be issued unless written notice of the application therefor 7 stating the proposed location shall have been given at least 8 thirty days earlier to the city or town in which the proposed 9 billboard, sign or other advertising device is to be located, and 10 unless a public hearing has been held in said city or town. HOUSE No. 1466 - By Mrs. Newman of Cambridge, petition of Charles W.Eliot that the Planning Division of the Department of Commerce and Development be authorized to in- vestigate and study enabling legislation for planning and zoning by cities, towns, counties and other public agencies. Mercantile Affairs. irbe commonwaim of ipmaehuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATIVE TO THE ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BY TOWNS, CITIES, COUNTIES, REGIONS AND STATE AGENCIES. 1 Resolved, That the planning division of the department of 2 commerce and development is hereby authorized and directed 3 to make an investigation and study of the enabling legislation 4 for planning and zoning by towns, cities, counties, regions and 5 state agencies with particular reference to clarification and re- 6 writing of chapter forty A and sections eighty-one A through 7 eighty-one GG of chapter forty-one of the General Laws in 8 order to utilize the experience of this and other states for the 9 orderly growth and development of the commonwealth and its 10 several parts. Said planning division shall be assisted by an 11 unpaid advisory committee to consist of one member of the 12 senate to be designated by the president thereof, three members 13 of the house of representatives to be designated by the speaker 14 thereof, the commissioner of commerce and development, or his 15 designee, the commissioner of natural resources, or his designee, 16 the president of the metropolitan area planning council, or his 17 designee, and four persons to be appointed by the governor from 18 nominees by the Massachusetts Federation of Planning Boards, 19 the Massachusetts Association of Real Estate Boards, the Home 20 Builders Association of Massachusetts, the Boston section of 2HOUSE —No. 1466. [Jan. 1967. 21 the American Institute of Planners, the Department of City 22 Planning of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and by 23 the Department of City and Regional Planning of the Harvard 24 Graduate School of Design. 25 The department of commerce and development may contract 26 for the services of specialists in planning including legal services. 27 The sum of twenty thousand dollars is hereby appropriated 28 for the expenses of said planning division of the department of 29 commerce and development. Expenditure of such funds may 30 be in conjunction with such Federal or private grants as may 31 be available. HOUSE . . No. 1969 By Mr. Armstrong of Plymouth, petition of the County.Commissioners and Sheriffs Association of Mass. for legislation to assist and develop regional plan- ning by and within counties. Counties. Cite ¢ommoniuealtb of fflanaftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT TO ASSIST AND DEVELOP REGIONAL PLANNING BY AND WITHIN COUNTIES. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 14 of chapter 34 of the General Laws as most re- t cently amended by chapter 58 of the acts of 1948, is hereby 3 further amended by inserting, after the first paragraph, the 4 following paragraph:— 5 The commissioners may establish a department of planning 6 to study and recommend to the commissioners with respect to 7 the social, recreational and economic development of the 8 county, to stimulate and assist regional planning boards and 9 districts, and cities and towns, in adopting and executing 10 regional planning programs, to study and recommend with 11 respect to federal programs and assistance available to cities, 12 towns and the county for regional planning and other pur- 13 poses, and to hold seminars, meetings and discussions among 14 private and governmental individuals and groups to stimulate 15 and assist in the development and execution of plans to further 16 the social, recreational and economic welfare of the county. 17 For these purposes, including the execution of any such plans, 1S the county may receive any funds or moneys from any source, 19 including grants, requests, gifts, or contributions made by the 20 federal or state government or by any individual, corporation, 21 or association. For these purposes, also, the county commis- 22 sioners may establish an advisory committee of such number 23 as they determine which shall include representatives of cities 24 and towns, business, labor, education, and civic and planning 25 organizations. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 2240 By Mr.Cain of Wilmington,petition of`Marren Y. Ganley and another for legis- lation to define the word "lot" under the subdivision control law. Mercantile Affairs. Cbe ¢ommontvealtb of coaooatbuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. • AN ACT DEFINING THE WORD "LOT" UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The third paragraph of section 81L of chapter 41 of the 2 General Laws is hereby amended by striking out, in lines 2 and 3 3, the words "used, or available for use, as the site of one or 4 more buildings", —so as to read as follows:— "Lot" shall 5 mean an area of land in one ownership, with definite boundaries. HOUSE . . . . . No. 2621 By Mr. Dukakis of Brookline, petition of Michael S. Dukakis, Oliver F. Ames, Philbert L. Pellegrini and another for an investigation by the Planning Division of the Department of Commerce and Development relative to enabling legis- lation ees- lation for planning and zoning by cities and towns. Mercantile Affairs. Cite ¢ommontuealtb of Efaooacibuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY THE PANNING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND DEVEI, OPMENT RELATIVE TO THE ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BY CITIES AND TOWNS. 1 Resolved, That the planning division of the department of 2 commerce and development is hereby authorized and directed 3 to make an investigation and study of the enabling legislation • 4 for planning and zoning by cities and towns with particular 5 reference to clarification and re-writing of chapter forty A S and section eighty-one A through eighty-one GG of chapter 7 forty-one of the General Laws in order to utilize the experience 8 of this and other states for the orderly growth and development 9 of the commonwealth and its several parts. Said planning 10 division shall be assisted by an unpaid advisory committee to 11 consist of the commissioner of natural resources, or his desig- 12 nee, the President of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, 13 or his designee, the President of the Massachusetts Federation 14 of Planning Boards, or his designee, and five persons to be 15 appointed by the governor from nominees by the Massachusetts 16 Association of Real Estate Boards, the Home Builders Associa- 17 tion of Massachusetts, the Boston section of the American In- 18 stitute of Planners, the Department of City Planning of the 19 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and by the Department 20 of City and Regional Planning of the Harvard Graduate School 21 of Design, together with two Representatives designated by the 22 speaker of the house and one senator designated by the presi- 23 dent of the senate, and the chairman of the advisory committee 2 HOUSE—No. 2621. [Jan. 1967. • 24 as set up by chapter six hundred and thirty-six of the acts of 25 nineteen hundred and sixty-four. 26 The department of commerce and development may con- 27 tract for the services of specialists in planning including legal 28 services. • - I t • HOUSE . . . . . . No. 3032 By Mr. Cole of Lexington, petition of Robert A. Bowyer for legislation to authorize planning boards to grant exceptions to a zoning ordinance or by-law. Mercantile Affairs. Cite eommontueaItib of efnoarfbuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING PLANNING BOARDS TO GRANT EXCEPTIONS TO A ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 4 of chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by deleting the third, fourth, and fifth sentences • 3 and inserting in place thereof the following:—The board of 4 appeals established under section fourteen, or the city council 5 of such city or the selectmen of such town, or the planning 6 board of such city or town, as such ordinance or by-law may 7 provide, may, in appropriate cases and subject to appropriate 8 conditions and safeguards, grant to an applicant a special 9 permit to make use of his land or to erect and maintain 10 buildings or other structures thereon in accordance with such 11 an exception. Before granting such a special permit the board 12 of appeals, or the city council or the selectmen, or the 13 planning board, whichever the ordinance or by-law provides, 14 shall hold a public hearing thereon, notice of which shall be 15 given in accordance with section seventeen. If the city council 16 or the selectmen, or the planning board, are designated to act 17 upon such a special permit they shall be subject to the 18 requirements of sections eighteen, nineteen, twenty and 19 twenty-one in the same manner as the board of appeals. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 3170 By Mr. Cole of Lexington (by request), petition of Robert A.Bowyer for legis- lation to amend the zoning enabling law to permit cities and towns to prohibit use variances. Mercantile Affairs. irbe Commonluealtib of Cffiaaoaeibuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AMENDING THE ZONING ENABLING ACT TO PERMIT CITIES AND • TOWNS TO PROHIBIT USE VARIANCES. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 15 of chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by inserting at the end thereof the following para- 3 graph:— 4 After acceptance of this provision, a city or town may pro- 5 vide in its zoning ordinance or by-law that no variance may be 6 granted which would result in the establishment of a use in a 7 zoning district if such use is not otherwise permitted in such 8 district by right or by special permit for exception. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 3171 By Mr. Cole of Lexington, petition of Robert A. Bowyer for legislation to authorize cities and towns to relate their zoning ordinance or by-law to a master plan. Mercantile Affairs. Che eommollwcaltlb of s5a0subuaetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO RELATETHEIR ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW TO A MASTER PLAN. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: • 1 Section 2 of chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by inserting at the end thereof the following para- 3 graph:— 4 After acceptance of this provision, a city or town may pro- 5 vide that its zoning ordinance or by-law, in whole or in part, 6 is drafted in accordance with, or is based upon, or is intended 7 to put into effect a master plan, as defined by section eighty- 8 one D of chapter forty-one, provided such master plan has 9 been adopted by a majority vote of the planning board of such 10 city or town. HOUSE No. 3172 By Mr. Cole of Lexington, petition of Robert A. Bowyer that cities and towns be authorized to amend their zoning ordinances or by-laws to create planned development zoning districts. Mercantile Affairs. cbe commontuealtib of s5aooacbtloetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO AMEND THEIR ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW TO CREATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby amended by in- 2 serting after section 2 the following section:- 3 Section 2A. For any or all of the purposes of a zoning ordi- 4 nance or by-law, as set forth in section two, a city or town may 5 amend such zoning ordinance or by-law to create planned de- b velopment districts subject to the provisions of this section. 7 A planned development district shall be a zoning district 8 whose boundaries are coincident with a large tract of land 9 which is to be designed, developed, and managed under sin- 10 gle ownership or control over a period of years. The regula- 11 tions and provisions of such district: (1) shall be applica- 12 ble to one such tract of land, (2) may refer to and be con- 13 tingent upon the execution of a specific site plan or develop- 14 ment plan of the owner, (3) need not be set forth in the text 15 of the zoning ordinance or by-law prior to amendment to the 16 zoning map, and may be drafted at the time of preliminary 17 review by city or town officials, and (4) may refer to and be 18 contingent upon the execution of agreements, contracts, deed 19 restrictions, sureties, or other such instruments. 20 The powers granted herein may be exercised by any city or 21 town which first amends the text of its zoning ordinance or 22 by-law to include a provision that:— (1) refers to this section •2 HOUSE-No. 3172. [Jan. i 23 of this chapter, (2) specifies a minimum land area for such 24 districts, (3) includes a statement of the intent or objectives 25 of such provision, (4) sets forth general standards for the in- 26 tensity of development, a minimum percentage of open space, 27 and if a predominantly residential development, a maximum 28 density of population, (5) sets forth findings of fact which 29 must be made by the city council or town meeting, and the 30 planning board of the city or town, (6) sets forth procedures 31 pertaining to petition for amendment, and hearing on and 32 approval of such planned development or stages thereof, and 33 (7)designates an agency, or official, of the city or town to 34 administer the provision and exercise other powers as the 35 city council or town meeting may prescribe; provided that 36 prior to the consideration of any petition for a planned devel- 37 opment district under such provision of such text, the planning 38 board of such city or town shall have adopted a master plan, 39 as defined in section eighty-one D of chapter forty-one In no 40 case shall a zoning ordinance or by-law be amended to create 41 a planned development district unless such district has at least 42 two acres of land. 43 The substantive provisions of the text of a zoning ordinance 44 or by-law for each planned development district created in ac- 45 cordance with this section shall include at least the follow- 46 ing:— (1) the uses permitted, (2) the maximum intensity of 47 development of buildings and structures, (3) the maximum 48 height of buildings and structures, (4) minimum standards 49 of open space in the district, and such provisions may also in- 50 elude other standards, such as, but not limited to: off-street 51 parking and loading, open space, elements of landscape design 52 and development signs and illumination, screening, buffer 53 strips, performance standards to abate the nuisance charac- 54 teristics of uses, automotive and pedestrian circulation systems, 55 and utility systems. 56 In addition to the procedures and requirements for amend- 57 ments set forth in sections six and seven of this chapter, a pro- 58 vision of a zoning ordinance or by-law adopted in accordance 59 with this section: (1) may provide for review, administration 60 and public hearings, both prior to petition for amendment to 61 create a planned development district, such as for review and 62 approval of a preliminary development plan, and subsequent 63 to adoption of such amendment, to insure the execution of the ! • 1967.1 HOUSE—No. 3172. 3 64 development in stages, to permit minor modification of a de- 65 velopment plan, or to permit approval of definitive plans which 66 carry out the development plan, (2) may designate certain 67 agencies, or officials of the city or town, such as the planning 68 board, to review the development plan, administer the provi- 69 sions of the zoning ordinance or by-law, and to permit minor 70 modifications of the development plan; however, no such minor 71 modification shall have the effect of amending the provisions 72 of the zoning ordinance or by-law; and (3) in the case of non- 73 execution of the development plait may provide for the revo- 74 cation of the action of the city council or town meeting in 75 amending the zoning ordinance or by-law, and the restoration 76 of the affected land area to its prior zoning status. 77 The petitioner for an amendment to create a planned de- 78 velopment district shall accompany his petition with a develop- 79 ment plan which shall include at least the following: (1) a 80 narrative statement of development objectives and design in- 81 tent, (2) a general site plan including at least: land uses, 82 buildings and structures, automotive circulation, open spaces, 83 and utilities, (3) a development schedule, and (4) legal docu- 84 mentation including, but not limited to agreements, contracts, • 85 deed restrictions, sureties and other instruments to execute 86 the development, and an instrument binding himself and suc- 87 cessors in title to abide by commitments made in relation to 88 such development plan for a stated period of years. Such de- 89 velopment plan shall be in such form and shall contain such 90 additional information as the city council, or town meeting, 91 or their agent may require. HOUSE No. 3173 By Mr. Cole of Lexington, petition of Robert A. Bowyer for legislation rela- tive to the definition and requirements of a master plan under the laws relative to municipal planning. Mercantile Affairs. c je commontneaub of comarbuoetta In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT RELATIVE TO THE DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF A MAS- TER PLAN UNDER THE LAWS RELATIVE TO MUNICIPAL PLANNING. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: • 1 Section 81D of chapter 41 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by striking out the second sentence, as appearing in 3 section 4 of chapter 340 of the acts of 1947, and inserting in 4 place thereof the following two sentences:—Such master plan 5 shall be a unified document of text, chart, graphics or maps, 6 or any combination, which is designed to foresee the future 7 growth and development of the city or town to the greatest 8 extent feasible, to provide in recorded form a statement of the 9 objectives, principles, policies and standards which will guide 10 such growth and development in the most desirable patterns 11 for the physical, economic and social well-being of the city or 12 town, to become the basis for public actions and decisions with 13 respect to such future growth and development, and to assist 14 private persons in developing their own property in the most 15 appropriate relationships to future growth and development 16 as contemplated and set forth in such plan. The terms "com- 17 prehensive plan", "general plan", "development plan" or "com- 18 prehensive community plan" may be used in place of the term 19 "master plan". HOUSE . . . No. 3174 By Mr. Cole of Lexington (by request), petition of Robert A. Bowyer for amending the zoning enabling law to permit cities and towns to require a three- fourths vote to amend zoning ordinances or by-laws when planning boards rec- ommended against the amendment. Mercantile Affairs. Cbe eammontuealtib of Massarbuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AMENDING THE ZONING ENABLING ACT TO PERMIT CITIES AND TOWNS TO REQUIRE A THREE-FOURTHS TO AMEND A ZONING ORDI- NANCE OR BY-LAW WHEN THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDS AGAINST THE AMENDMENT. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in • General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 7 of chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by inserting thereof the following paragraph:- 3 After acceptance of this provision, in the case where the 4 planning board, in a written report filed prior to the final 5 vote of a city council or town meeting, recommends against 6 adoption of a proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance or 7 by-law, no change of such ordinance or by-law shall be adopted 8 except by a three-fourths vote fo such town meeting or by a 9 three fourths vote of all members of such city council. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 3205 By Mr. Khachadoorian of Arlington, petition of Gregory B. Khachadoorian for requiring the underground installation of certain telephone and electric lines in newly subdivided areas. Power and Light. Cbe commouluesltb of s9aoollrbuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. • AN ACT REQUIRING THE UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN LIGHT AND TELEPHONE LINES IN NEWLY SUBDIVIDED AREAS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Chapter 166 of the General Laws is hereby amended by in- 2 serting after section 21 the following section:— 3 Section 219.. All telephone and electric service running 4 into newly subdivided areas of land shall be carried by under- 5 ground installations only. HOUSE No. 3315 By Mr.Wojtkowski of Pittsfield,petition of Thomas C. Wojtkowski that cities and towns be authorized to elect a board of appeals on zoning. Mercantile Af- fairs. ebe commonive aj of maooarbuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO ELECT A BOARD OF AP- PEALS ON ZONING. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Chapter 40A of the General Laws is hereby amended by 2 inserting after section 14 the following two sections:— 3 Section 1118. A city or town which accepts this section, in 4 the manner provided by section fourteen B, may elect the mem- s bers of the board of appeals at their regular annual elections. 6 Section 14B. Section fourteen A shall be submitted for ac- 7 ceptance to the registered voters at a regular city election if 8 the city council so votes, and a town at an annual town election 9 upon petition of fifty registered voters, substantially in the 10 form of the following question, which shall be placed on the 11 official ballot used for the election of officers at such city or 12 town election:—"Shall the city (or town) vote to accept the 13 provisions of section fourteen A of chapter forty A of the Gen- 14 eral Laws, which authorize cities and towns to elect the mem- 15 bers of the board of appeals at each regular election of officers 16 at such city or town." 17 If the majority of votes in answer to said question is in the 18 affirmative, then said section shall thereupon take full effect 19 in such city or town, but not otherwise. HOUSE . . . . No. 3467 By Mr. Coury of New Bedford, petition of Edward P. Coury and another for legislation to limit the proceedings in certain cases where persons are aggrieved by zoning laws.Mercantile Affairs. cite ¢ommonwcaltb of (Paooarlbuoetts In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT LIMITING PROCEEDINGS BY PERSONS AGGRIEVED BY ZONING LAWS AND AMENDMENTS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in • General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Chapter 40A of the General Laws is 'hereby amended by 2 inserting after section 6 the following section:- 3 Section 6A. Any person aggrieved by the action of a city 4 council or town meeting by the adoption, amendment, 5 addition to or repeal of a zoning ordinance or by-law may 6 appeal to the superior court sitting in equity for the county in 7 which the land is situated; provided that such appeal is filed 8 in said court within fifteen days after the effective date of 9 such ordinance, by-law, amendment, addition or repeal. The 10 foregoing remedy shall be exclusive. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 3637 By Mr. Travaline of Somerville, petition of Joseph T. Travaline for legislation to require the approval of cities and towns prior to the issuance of permits by the Outdoor Advertising Division. Mercantile Affairs. Cbe ¢ommontuealtb of W00acbusetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTIS- ING DIVISION. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 The first sentence of section 29A of chapter 93 of the 2 General Laws, as appearing in section 5 of chapter 584 of the 3 acts of 1955, is hereby amended by adding after the word 4 "town", in line 9, the words:—, and only if the city council or 5 board of selectmen notify the board that it approves the 6 issuance of such permit. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 3639 By Mr. Wojtkowski of Pittsfield, petition of Thomas C. Wojtkowski for legislation to authorize planning boards to grant special permits under the zoning law. Mercantile Affairs. cbe commonlnealm of Q5,5anacf oats In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING PLANNING BOARDS TO GRANT SPECIAL PERMITS UNDER THE ZONING LAW. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 4 of chapter 40A of the General Laws, 2 as most recently amended by chapter 199 of the acts of 1966, • 3 is hereby further amended by inserting in line 9, after the 4 word "town" the following words:—or the planning board. 1 SECTION 2. The first paragraph of section 21 of chapter 40A 2 of the General Laws, as most recently amended by section 1 3 of chapter 199 of the acts of 1957, is hereby further amended 4 by inserting after the word "appeals" in line 2, the words:- 5 other than all application under paragraph 2 of section 6 fifteen. 1 SECTION 3. Said section 21 of said chapter 40A is hereby 2 further amended by inserting after the first paragraph the 3 following paragraph:—Any person aggrieved by a decision of 4 a board of appeals on an application under paragraph 2 of 5 section fifteen may appeal to the planning board; provided 6 that such appeal shall be filed with the planning board within 7 fifteen days after such decision is recorded. The planning 8 board shall hear all the pertinent evidence and determine the 9 facts and may make such decision as justice and equity 2 HOUSE—No. 3639. [Jan. 1967. • 10 require. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the planning 11 board on such appeal may appeal to the superior court in the 12 same manner and subject to the same provisions as set forth 13 in the first paragraph of this section and such remedy shall be 14 exclusive. 1 SECTION 4. The second paragraph of said section 21 of said 2 chapter 40A is hereby amended by inserting, in line 3, after 3 the word"appeal" the words:—or-of the planning board. 1 SECTION 5. The third paragraph of said section 21 of said 2 chapter 40A is hereby amended by striking out, in line 1, the 3 word "board" and inserting in place thereof the words:— 4 planning board or the board of appeals. 1 SECTION 6. The fourth paragraph of said section 21 of said 2 chapter 40A is hereby amended by striking out the word 3 "board" and inserting in place thereof the words:—planning 4 board of board of appeals. • HOUSE No. 3795 By Miss Howe of Somerville, petition of Marie E. Howe and another for requiring the approval of cities and towns prior to the issuance of permits for outdoor advertising.Mercantile Affairs. cbe �ommontueattb of 8�as�acbusett� In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as • follows: 1 Section 29A of chapter 93 of the General Laws, as inserted 2 by section 5 of chapter 584 of the acts of 1955, is hereby 3 amended by striking out the first sentence and inserting in 4 place thereof the following sentence:—Whenever, within 5 thirty days after notification to the city or town, the board 6 shall have received written objection to an application for a 7 permit, such permit shall issue only after consideration by the 8 board of such objection, and whenever, within thirty days 9 after notification to the city or town, the board shall have 10 received written notice of intention to appear in opposition to 11 the application, the board shall issue such permit only after a 12 public hearing on due notice to the applicant and the city or 13 town, and only if the city council, aldermen or selectmen, as 14 the case may be, approves the issuance of such permit. f HOUSE . . . . No. 3799 By Mr. Williams of Andover (by request), petition of Karl Haartz for legislation to regulate the size of lots for factory, industrial or commercial activities.Mercantile Affairs. Clbe ¢ommontnealth of ePao0aftoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT REGULATING THE SIZE OF LOTS FOR FACTORY, INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as • follows: 1 To further capitalize on the potential of the automobile, 2 and its widespread ownership and the constantly expanding 3 highway system, and further; to assist with defeating accu- 4 mulation of smog to the danger point, not more than one 5 hundred acres of land space shall be devoted to factory, 6 industrial or commercial activity for each five miles of 7 highway in a given area. Single lots that are more than 8 twenty acres in area shall be separated by at least three miles 9 of land area that has a dwelling density of not more than one 10 dwelling to each two acres of land. HOUSE . . . . . . No. 4064 By Mr. Wojtkowski of Pittsfield, petition of Thomas C. Wojtkowski for legislation to authorize cluster development under the subdivision control law. Mercantile Affairs. Cbe commontuealtb of wombuuetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ERCT AUTHORIZING CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE SUBDIVI- SION CONTROL LAW. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 Section 81R of chapter. 41 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by adding the following paragraph:- 3 The planning board may authorize cluster development, so 4 called, subject to the following sections, notwithstanding 5 anything to the contrary in section eighty-one L. SENATE . . . . . . No. 576 By Mr. Quinn, a petition of Edmund Ryan for legislation to authorize the employment of special counsel on city and town planning boards. Municipal Finance. of Tantlnoltwoultll of Massor4itar is In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ON • CITY AND TOWN PLANNING BOARDS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 Section 81A of chapter 41 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by striking out the eighth sentence, as appearing in 3 section 4 of chapter 340 of the acts of 1947, and inserting in 4 place thereof the following sentence: —Such a board shall elect 5 annually a chairman and a clerk from among its own number, 6 and may employ experts, clerical and other assistants, and spe- 7 cial counsel. SENATE . . . . . . No. 576 By Mr. Quinn, a petition of Edmund Ryan for legislation to authorize the employment of special counsel on city and town planning boards. Municipal Finance. the Tommonwealth of fKassarhasetfo In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ON • CITY AND TOWN PLANNING BOARDS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled,and by the authority of the same,as follows: 1 Section 81A of chapter 41 of the General Laws is hereby 2 amended by striking out the eighth sentence, as appearing in 3 section 4 of chapter 340 of the acts of 1947, and inserting in 4 place thereof the following sentence: —Such aboard shall elect 5 annually a chairman and a clerk from among its own number, 6 and may employ experts, clerical and other assistants, and spe- 7 cial counsel. A HOUSE No. 3466 By Mr. Belmonte of Framingham, petition of Robert A. Behnonte for an investigation by a special commission (including members of the General Court) relative to the zoning laws. Mercantile Affairs. Che Commonluealtb of a5matbuoetto In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven. RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL • COMMISSION RELATIVE TO ZONING LAWS. 1 Resolved, That a special commission, to consist of three 2 members of the senate, five members of the house of 3 representatives, and two persons be appointed by the gov- 4 ernor, is hereby established for the purpose of making an 5 investigation and study relative to zoning laws, with a . 6 particular view to modernizing and strengthening said 7 laws. HOUSE . . No. 236 p. By Mr.Harrington of Salem,petition of Michael J. Harrington for the creation and operation ofmetropolitan service corporations to provide and coordinate cer- tain public services and functions for metropolitan areas. NTetropolitan.Affairs. � �$e QCommontneattfj of 9�a��acfju�ett� - - - In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty-Seven.Seven— AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION AND -OPERATION OF METRO- POLITAN SERVICE 'CORPORATIONS TO PROVIDE AND COORDINATE CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICES AND FUNCTIONS FORMETROPOLITAN AREAS. Beit enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1. It is hereby declared to be the public policy of 2 the commonwealth of Massachusetts to provide for the people • 3 of the populous metropolitan areas in the commonwealth the 4 means of obtaining essential services not adequa'teiy:provided 5 by existing agencies of local government. The growWof urban 6 population and the movement of people into suburban areas 7 has created problems of sewage and garbage disposal, water 8 supply, public transportation, planning, police and fire pro- 9 tection,parks and parkways which extend beyond the boundaries 10 of cities, counties and special districts. For reasons of to- ll pography, location and movement of population, and land con- 12 ditions and development, one or more of these problems cannot 13 be adequately met by the individual cities, towns, and coun- 14 ties of metropolitan areas. It is the purpose of this act to enable 15 cities, towns, and counties to act jointly to meet these common 16 problems in order that the proper growth and development of 17 the metropolitan areas of the commonwealth may be assured and 18 the health and welfare of the people residing therein may be 19 secured. 1 SECTION 2. As used herein: 2 (a) "Metropolitan service corporation" means a municipal 2 HOUSE—No'. 236. [Jan. • 3 service corporation of the'commonwealth created pursuant to 4 this act. 5 (b) "Metropolitan area" as used herein is an area designated 6 as a"standard metropolitan statistical area"by the U.S.Bureau 7 of the Census in the most recent nationwide Census of the Pop- $ ulation, except that in the ease of the Boston Metropolitan area 9 it is'as defined in chapter one hundred and seventy-eight of the 10 acts of nineteen hundred and sixty-five: 11 ' (c). "Service area" means the area contained within the 12_boundaries of an' existing or proposed metropolitan service 13 corporation. 14 (d) "City" means an incorporated city or town: 15 (e) "Component city" means an incorporated city or town 16 .within,a service area. 17. . (f).. "Component county" means a county of which all or 18 part is included within a service area. , 19 (g) "Central city" means the city with the largest popula- 20 tion in a service area. 21 (h) "Central county" means the county containing the city 22 with the largest population in a service area. . 23 (i) "Special district" means any municipal corporation of 24 the commonwealth of Massachusetts other than a city, town, • 25 county, or metropolitan service corporation. 26 (j) "Metropolitan council" means the legislative body of a 27 metropolitan service corporation. 28_ (k) "City council" means the legislative body of any city 29 or town. 30 (l) "Population" means the number of residents as shown 31 by the figures released from the most recent official Federal 32 Census of Population or Massachusetts State Census. 33 (m) "Metropolitan function" means any of the functions of 34 government named in section two of this act. 35 (n) "Authorized metropolitan function" means a metro- 36 politan function which a metropolitan service corporation shall 37 have been authorized to perform in the manner provided in this 38 act. 1 SEcTioN 3. A metropolitan service corporation may be or- t ganized to perform certain metropolitan functions, as provided 3 in this act, for a service area consisting of contiguous territory 4 which comprises all or part of a metropolitan area and includes • 1967.1 HOUSE —No. 236. . 3 5 the entire area or two or more cities, of which at least"one has 6 a population of fifty thousand or more; provided, that if a 7 metropolitan service corporation shall-be authorized to perform 8 the function of metropolitan. comprehensive planning it shall 9 exercise such power, to the extent-found feasible and appro- 10 priate, for the entire metropolitan .area rather_than only for 11 .some smaller service area. .No metropolitan service corpora- 12 tion shall have a service area.wbich includes only a part of.any 13 city, and every city shall be either.wholly,included or wholly 14 excluded from the boundaries of a service.area. No territory 15 shall be included within the service area of more than one metro- 16 politan service corporation. 1 SECTION 4. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2'the power to perform any one or more of the following functions, 3 when authorized in the manner provided in this act:-- 4 (a) Metropolitan planning. 5 (b) Metropolitan sewage disposal. 6 (c) Metropolitan water supply. 7 (d) Metropolitan public transportation. " 8 (e) 'Metropolitan refuse and garbage disposal. • 9 (f) Metropolitan parks and parkways. 10 (g) Metropolitan air-pollution control. 1 SECTION 5. With respect to each function it is authorized to 2 perform, a metropolitan service corporation shall make services 3 available throughout its service area on a uniform basis, or sub- 4 ject only to classifications or distinctions which are applied uni- 5 formly throughout the service area and which are reasonably 6 related" to such relevant factors as population density, to- 7 pography, types of users, and volume of services used. As 8 among various parts of the service area, no differentiation shall 9 be made in the nature of services provided, or in the conditions 10 of their availability, which is determined by the fact that par- 11 titular territory is located within or outside of a component 12 city. 1 SECTION 6. A metropolitan service corporation may be cre- 2 ated by vote of the qualified electors residing in a metropolitan 3 area in the manner provided in this act. An election to authorize 4 HOUSE —No. 236. [Jan. 4 the creation of a metropolitan service corporation may be called 5 pursuant to either a resolution or a petition, as follows: 6 (a) A resolution or concurring resolutions calling for such an 7 election may be adopted by either: 8 (1) The city council of a central city; or 9 (2) The city councils or two or more component cities other 1 10 than a central city; or 11 (3) The county commissioners of a central county. 12 (4) The board of selectmen of two or more component towns. 13. (b) A petition calling for such an election shall be signed by 14 at least four per cent of the qualified voters residing within the 15 metropolitan area. 16 Any resolution or petition calling for such an election shall 17 describe the boundaries of the proposed service area, name the 18metropolitan function or functions which the metropolitan serv- 19 ice corporation shall be authorized to perform in the service 20 area. 1 SECTION 7. The election on the formation of the metropolitan 2 service corporation shall be conducted by the secretary of the 3 commonwealth in accordance with the general election laws of 4 the commonwealth, who shall certify the result of the election. • 5 Notice of the election shall be published in one or more news- 6 papers of general circulation in each component county in the 7 manner provided by law. No persons shall be entitled to vote at 8 such election unless he is a qualified voter under the laws of the 9 Commonwealth in effect at the time of such election and has re- 10 sided within the service area for at least thirty days preceding 11 the date of the election. The ballot proposition shall be in the 12 following form:— FORMATION OF METROPOLITAN SERVICE CORPORATION Shall a metropolitan service corporation be established for theareadescribed in a resolution of the county commissioners of ( ) county adopted on the'( . ) day of ( ) 19 ( ) to perform the metropolitan functions of [here insert the title of each of the functions to be authorized as set forth in the petition or initial resolution]? ikS• NO—. 13 If a majority of the persons voting on the proposition residing 14 within the service area shall vote in favor thereof, the metro- 15 politan service corporation shall thereupon be established and 16 the secretary of the commonwealth shall publish a notice setting • 1967.1 HOUSE —No. 236. 5 17 a time and place for the first meeting of the metropolitan coun- 18 cil which shall be held not later than thirty days after the date 19 of such election. A copy of such resolution shall be transmitted to 20 the legislative body of each component city and county, which 21 shall be affected by the particular metropolitan functions au- 22 thorized. o 1 SECTION S. A metropolitan service corporation may be au- 2 thorized to perform one or more metropolitan functions in addi- 3 tion to those which it has previously been authorized to perform, 4 with the approval of the voters at an election, conducted in the 5 manner provided by law in sections six and seven of this act 6 concerning an election on the original formation of a metro- 7 politan service corporation. 8 If a majority of the persons voting on the proposition shall 9 vote in favor thereof the metropolitan service corporation shall 10 be authorized to perform such additional metropolitan function 11 or functions. 1 SECTION 9. The service area of a metropolitan service cor- 2 poration may be extended, subject to the general geographical • 3 conditions stated in section four, in the manner provided in this 4 section. 5 (a) The metropolitan council of a metropolitan service cor- 6 poration may make or authorize studies to ascertain the de- 7 sirability and feasibility of extending the service area of the 8 corporation to include particular additional territory within the 9 metropolitan area which is contiguous to the existing service 10 area of the corporation. If such studies appear to justify, the 11 metropolitan council may adopt a resolution stating that it has 12 formally under consideration the annexation of certain territory 13 to the service area. The resolution shall clearly describe the 14 area or areas concerned, and shall specify the time and place of 15 a public hearing to be held on the matter by the metropolitan 16 council. Such resolution shall be published in one or more news- 17 papers having general circulation in the metropolitan area, at 18 least thirty days before the date set for the public hearing. 19 (b) The metropolitan council shall hold the public hearing so 20 announced, to receive testimony on the question of extending 21 the boundaries of the service area, and it may hold further pub- 22 lic hearings on the matter, subject in each instance to published 1 6 HOUSE —No. 236. [Jan. • 23 notice in a newspaper having general circulation in the area, at 24 least three days in advance. 25 (c) Following such hearings, the metropolitan council may, 26 by resolution, authorize the annexation to the service area of 27 all or any portion of the territory which was considered for an- 28 nexation in accordance with the foregoing paragraphs of this 29 section. Stich resolution shall clearly describe the area or areas 30 to be annexed and shall specify the effective date of the annexa- 31 tion, which shall in no event be sooner than either: (1) six 32 months from the date when such resolution is published; or 33 (2) one month after the date of the next regular primary or 34 general election to be held throughout the metropolitan area. 35 The resolution shall be published in one or more newspapers i 36 having general circulation in the metropolitan area. 37 (d) Any annexation to the service area of a metropolitan 38 service corporation which is authorized in the manner provided 39 above shall become effective on the date specified unless nulli- 40 lied pursuant to a popular referendum conducted as follows: 41 To be sufficient, a petition calling for a popular referendum 42 on the prospective annexation of particular territory to the 43 service area of a metropolitan service corporation shall be j 44 signed by at least either: (1) four per cent of the qualified voters • 45 residing within the entire service area of the corporation as 46 prospectively enlarged; or (2) twenty per cent of the qualified 47 voters residing within the territory concerning which a refer- 48 endum is proposed. The petition shall indicate such territory, { J 49 in terms of any one or more entire areas specified for annexa- 50 tion by the metropolitan council resolution which is described 51 in paragraph (3) above. Such petition shall be filed with the 52 secretary of the commonwealth within thirty days of the pub- 53 lication of the annexation resolution by the metropolitan coun- 54 cil. The secretary shall examine the same and certify to the 55 sufficiency of the signatures thereon. If a sufficient petition is 56 filed, the question specified by such petition shall be submitted 57 at the next regular primary for general election held throughout 58 the metropolitan area. If, at such election, a majority of the 59 vote cast on the question within the service area of the metro- 60 politan service corporation as prospectively enlarge&shall vote 61 against the annexation of a particular area or areas, the action 62 of the metropolitan council with respect to such area or areas 63 shall thereby be nullified. • 1967.1 HOUSE—No. 236. 7 1 SECTION 10. A metropolitan service corporation shall be 2 governed by a metropolitan council composed of the following: 3 (a) One member selected by, and from, the county commis- 4 sioners of each component county; 5 (b) One member who shall be the mayor of the central city; 6 (c) One member from each of the three largest component 7 cities other than the central city, selected by, and from, the 8 mayor, city council, and board of selectmen of each of such 9 cities; 10 (d) One member representing each of the component cities 11 other than the four largest cities to be selected from the mayors, 12 city councils, and boards of selectmen, of such smaller cities by 13 the mayors or chairmen of the board of selectmen of such cities 14 in the following manner: The mayors of all such cities and 15 selectmen of such towns shall meet on the second Tuesday fol- 16 lowing the establishment of a metropolitan service corporation 17 and thereafter on [ date ] of each even-numbered year at 18 [ ] o'clock at the office of the county commissioners of 19 the central county. The chairman of such board shall preside. 20 After nominations are made, ballots shall be taken and the 21 [ ] candidate(s) receiving the highest number of votes • 22 cast shall be considered selected; 23 (e) One member, who shall be chairman of the metropolitan 24 council, selected by the other members of the council. He shall 25 not hold any additional public office other than that of notary 26 public or member of the military forces of the United States or 27 of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts not on active duty. 1 SECTION 11. At the first meeting of the metropolitan coun 2 cil following the formation of a metropolitan service corporation, 3 the mayor of the central city shall serve as temporary chairman. 4 As its first official act the council shall elect a chairman. The 5 chairman shall be a voting member of the council and shall pre- 6 side at all meetings. In the event of his absence or inability to 7 act the council shall select one of its members to act as chairman 8 pro tempore. A majority of all members of the council shall 9 constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A smaller 10 number of council members than a quorum may adjourn from 11 time to time and may compel the attendance of absent members 12 in such manner.and under such penalties as the council may 13 provide. The council shall determine its own rules and order 8 AOUSE —No. 236. [Jan. • 14 of business, shall provide by resolution for the manner and time ' 15 of holding all regular and special meetings and shall keep a J 16 journal of its proceedings which shall be a public record. Every 17 legislative act of the council of a general or permanent nature 18 shall be by resolution. i 1 SECTION 12. The chairman shall hold office until [ date ] 2 of each even-numbered year. Each member of a metropolitan 3council selected under provisions of section one, paragraphs (a). 4 and (c) of this title shall hold office at the pleasure of the body -5 which selected him. No member other than the chairman may 6 hold office after he ceases to hold the position of mayor, commis-. 7 sinner, or councilor. 1 SECTION 13. A vacancy in the office of a member of the metro- 2 politan council shall be filled in the same manner as provided 3 for the original selection. The meeting of mayors to fill a va- 4 cancy of the member selected under the provisions of section 5 one (d) of this title shall be held at such time and place as shall. 6 be designated by the chairman of the metropolitan council after. 7 ten days' written notice mailed to the mayors of each of the 8 cities specified in section one (d) of this title. • 1 SECTION 14. The chairman of the metropolitan council shall 2 receive such compensation as the other members of the metro- 3 politan council shall provide. Members of the council other 4 than the chairman shall receive compensation for attendance at 5 metropolitan council or committee meetings of [ ] dol- 6 lars per diem but not exceeding a total of [ ] dollars in 7 any one month, in addition to any compensation which they 8 may receive as officers of component cities or counties; pro- 9 vided, that officers serving in such capacities on a full time basis. 10 shall not receive compensation for attendance at metropolitan 11 council or committee meetings. Members of the council may 12 be reimbursed for expenses actually incurred by them in the 13 conduct of official business for metropolitan service corporation. 1 SECTION 15. The name of a metropolitan service corporation 2 shall be established by its metropolitan council. Each metro- 3 politan service corporation shall adopt a corporate seal contain- 4 ing the name of the corporation and the date of its formation. I 1967.1 HOUSE —No. 236. 9 1 SECTION 16. All the powers and functions of a metropolitan 2 service corporation shall be vested in the metropolitan council 3 unless expressly vested in specific officers, boards, or commis- 4 sions by this act. Without limitation of the foregoing authority, 5 or of other powers given it by this act, the metropolitan council 6 shall have the following powers: & 7 (a) To establish offices, departments, boards and commissions 8 in addition to those provided by this act which are necessary 9 to carry out the purposes of the metropolitan service corpora- 10 tion, and to prescribe the functions, powers and duties thereof. 11 (b) To appoint or provide for the appointment of, and to re- 12 move or to provide for the removal of, all officers and employees 13 of the metropolitan service corporation except those whose ap- 14 pointment or removal is otherwise provided for by this act 15 subject to the civil service provisions of chapter thirty-one of 16 the General Laws. 17 (c) To fix the salaries, wages and other compensation of all 18 officers and employees of the metropolitan service corporation 19 except those otherwise fixed in this act subject to the civil service 20 provisions of chapter thirty-one of the General I:aws. I • 21 (d) To employ such engineering, legal, financial, or other 22 specialized personnel as may be necessary to accomplish the 23 purposes of the metropolitan service corporation. 1 SECTION 17. As expeditiously as possible after its establish- 2 meat or its authorization to undertake additional metropolitan 3 functions, the metropolitan service corporation shall develop 4 plans with regard to the extent and nature of the services it will 5 initially undertake with regard to each authorized metropolitan 6 function, and the effective dates when it will begin to perform gPi 7 particular functions. Such initial basic plans shall be adopted 8 by resolution of the metropolitan council. 1 .SECTION I8. The metropolitan service corporation shall plan 2 for such adjustment or extension of its initial assumption of re- 3 sponsibilities for particular authorized functions as is found de- 4. sirable, and .the metropolitan council may authorize such 5 changes by resolution. 1 SECTION 19. It shall be the duty of a metropolitan service 2 corporation to prepare comprehensive plans for the service area e L 10 HOUSE —No. 236. [Jan. • 3 with regard to present and future public facility requirements 4 for each of the metropolitan functions it is authorized to per- 5 form. 1 SECTION 20. If a metropolitan service corporation shall be 2 authorized to perform the functions of metropolitan comprehen- 3 sive planning, it shall have the following duties, in addition to 4 the other duties and powers granted by this act: 5 (a) To prepare a recommended comprehensive land use plan 6 and public capital facilities plan for the metropolitan area as a 7 whole. 8 (b) To review proposed zoning ordinances and resolutions or 9 comprehensive plans of component cities and counties and make 10 recommendations thereon. Such proposed zoning ordinances 11 and resolutions or comprehensive plans must be submitted to 12 the metropolitan council prior to adoption and may not be 13 adopted until reviewed and returned by the metropolitan coun- 14 cil. The metropolitan council shall cause such ordinances,resolu- 15 tions and plans to be reviewed by the planning staff of the 16 metropolitan service corporation and return such ordinances, 17 resolutions and plans, together with their findings and recom- 18 mendations thereon, within ninety days following their sub- • 19 mission. 20 (c) To provide planning services for component cities and 21 counties upon request and upon payment therefor by the cities 22 or counties receiving such service. 1 SECTION 21. A metropolitan service corporation shall offer 2 to employ every person who on the date such corporation acquires 3 a metropolitan facility is employed in the operation of such fa- 4 cility by a component city or county or by a special district. 5 Where a metropolitan service corporation employs a person em- 6 ployed immediately prior thereto by a component city or county, 7 or by a special district, such employee shall be deemed to re- 8 main an employee of such city, county or special district for the 9 purposes of any pension plan of such city, county, or special dis- 10 trict, and shall continue to be entitled to all rights and bene- 11 fits thereunder as if he had remained as an employee of the city, 12 county, or special district, ,until the metropolitan service cor- 13 poration has provided a. pension plan and such employee has • 1967.1 HOUSE—No. 236. 11 14 elected, in writing, to participate therein. Until such election, 15 the metropolitan service corporation shall deduct from the re- 16 numeration of such employee the amount which such employee 17 is or may be required to pay in accordance with the provisions 18 of the plan of such city, county, or special district and the 19 metropolitan service corporation shall pay to the city, county, 20 or special district any amounts required to be paid under the 21 provisions of such plan by employer and employee. 1 SECTION 22. In addition to the powers specifically granted 2 by this act a metropolitan service corporation shall have all 3 powers which are necessary to carry out the purposes of the 4 metropolitan service corporation and to perform authorized 5 metropolitan functions. 1 SECTION 23. A metropolitan service corporation may sue 2 and be sued in its corporate capacity in all courts and in all 3 proceedings. 1 SECTION 24. A metropolitan service corporation shall have • 2 power to adopt, by resolution of its metropolitan council, such 3 rules and regulations as shall be necessary or proper to enable 4 it to carry out authorized metropolitan functions and may pro- 5 vide penalties for the violation thereof. Actions to impose or 6 enforce such penalties may be brought in the superior court in 7 and for the central county. 1 SECTION 25. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 power to acquire by purchase, condemnation, gift, or grant and 3 to lease, construct, add to, improve, replace, repair, maintain, 4 operate and regulate the use of facilities requisite to its per- 5 formance of authorized metropolitan functions, together with 6 all lands, properties, equipment and accessories necessary for 7 such facilities. Facilities which are owned by a city or special 8 district may, with the consent of the legislative body of the city 9 or special districts owning such facilities, be acquired or used 10 by the metropolitan service corporation. Cities and special 11 districts are hereby authorized to convey or lease such facilities 12 to a metropolitanservice corporation or to contract for their 13 joint use on such terms as may be fined by agreement between 12 HOUSE—No. 236. [Jan. • 14 the legislative body of such city or special district and the 15 metropolitan council, without submitting the matter to the 16 voters of such city or district. 1 SECTION 26. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 power to acquire by purchase and condemnation all lands and 3 property rights, both within and without the metropolitan area, 4 which are necessary for its purposes. Such right of eminent do- 5 main shall be exercised by the metropolitan council in the same 6 manner and by the same procedure as is or may be provided by 7 law for cities, except insofar as such laws may be inconsistent 8 with the provisions of this act. 1 SECTION 27. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 power to construct or maintain metropolitan facilities in, along, 3 on, under, over, or through public streets, bridges, viaducts, 4 and other public rights-of-way without first obtaining a fran- 5 chise from the county or city having jurisdiction over the same; 6 provided, that such facilities shall be constructed and main- 7 tained in accordance with the ordinances and resolutions of 8 such city or county relating to construction, installation and 9 maintenance of similar facilities in such public properties. • 1 SECTION 28. Except as otherwise provided herein, a. metro- 2 politan service corporation may sell or otherwise dispose of any 3 real or personal property acquired in connection with any au- 4 thorized metropolitan function and which is no longer required 5 for the purposes of the metropolitan service corporation in the 6 same manner as provided for cities. When the metropolitan 7 council determines that a metropolitan facility or any part 8 thereof which has been acquired from a component city or 9 county without compensation is no longer required for metro- 10 politan purposes, but is required as a local facility by the city 11 or county from which it was acquired, the metropolitan council 12 shall by resolution transfer it to such eity or county. 1 SECTION 29. A metropolitan service corporation may con- t tract with the United States or any agency thereof, any state 3 or agency thereof, any other metropolitan service corporation, 4 any county, city, special district, or other governmental agency • "1967.1 HOUSE —No. 236. 13 5 for the operation by such entity of any facility or the perform- 6 ance on its behalf of any service which the metropolitan service 7 corporation is authorized to operate or perform, on such terms 8 as may be agreed upon by the contracting parties. 1 SECTION 30. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 power to set and collect charges for services it supplies and for 3 the use of metropolitan facilities it provides. 1 SECTION 31. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 the power to issue bonds for any authorized capital purpose of 3 the metropolitan service corporations; provided, that a proposi- 4 tion authorizing the issuance of such bonds shall have been sub- 5 mitted to the electors of the metropolitan service corporation at '6 a special election and assented to by a majority of the persons 7voting on said proposition at said election. 1 SECTION 32. The metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 the power to levy special assessments payable over a period 3 of not exceeding [ ] years on all property within the service • 4 area specially benefited by an improvement, on the basis of 5 special benefits conferred, to pay in whole or in part the damages 6 or costs of any such improvement. 1 SECTION 33. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 the power when authorized by a majority of all members of the 3 metropolitan council to borrow money from any component 4 city or county and such cities or counties are hereby authorized 5 to make such loans or advances on such terms as may be mu- 6 tually agreed upon by the metropolitan council and the legis- 7 lative bodies of such component city or county. 1 SECTION 34. All banks, trust companies, bankers, savings 2 banks and institutions, building and loan associations, savings 3 and loan associations, investment companies, and other persons 4 carrying on a banking or investment business, all insurance com- 5 panes, insurance associations, and other persons carrying on an 6 insurance business, and all executors, administrators, curators, 7 trustees and other fiduciaries, may legally invest any sinking 8 funds, moneys, or other funds belonging to them or within their 14 HOUSE—No. 236. [Jan. 1967. • 9 control in any bonds or other obligations issued by a metropoli- 10 tan service corporation pursuant to this act. Such bonds and 11 other obligations shall be authorized security for all public d(,- 12 e12 posits in the commonwealth. 1 SECTION 35. A metropolitan service corporation shall have 2 the power to invest its funds held in reserves or sinking funds 3 or any such funds which are not required for immediate dis- 4 bursement, in property or securities in which mutual savings 5 banks may legally invest funds. 1 SECTION 36. The provisions of this act shall take effect upon 2 enactment. 1 SECTION 37. If any provision of this act is found unconstitu- 2 tional by the court of jurisdiction, it shall not void the consti- 3 tutionality of the remaining provisions of this act. • OFFICE OF THE DEMOCRATIC FLOOR LEADER MASSACHUSETTS SENATE STATE HOUSE. BOSTON KEVIN B. HARRINGTON DEMOCRATIC FLOOR LEADER March 16, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman City of Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray : I wish to respond to your recent letter concerning bills affecting the Planning Board that are or will be before • the Massachusetts Legislature. I will study the content of these bills carefully and certainly bear your views in mind before voting upon them. Sincerely , /� q Senator Kevin B. Harrington SENATE MAJORITY FLOOR LEADER ms • E- A- rommonmeald jajae� • = �e ia9.c mn a/WaWW~ aiad -9.�ofemn�r�� T W. SLHULENBERG COMMISSIONER 727-`(3221 February 21, 1967 To: Planning Boards Boards of Appeal Consultants, Et Als The attached list dives the hearing dates for legislative bills in which you may be interested. Bills already heard prior to the date of this memo are not listed. There remains a handful of bills for which dates have not • been set. If time permits, another notice will be sent for these few. Please feel free to call the Planning Division about the progress or disposition of legislation. Respectfully, '�ZCT T. W. Schulenberg Commissioner • HEARING DATES FOR • SELECTED LEGISLATION 1967 Committee Room Time Harbors and Public Lands 443 1 P. M. Mercantile Affairs 423 10:30 A� M. Natural Resources 443 11 A. M. and 1:30 P. M, Power and Light 446 10:30 A. M. State Administration 423 10:30 A. Iv:. Transportation 436 11 A. M. February 27. H 236 BILL CREATING A METROPOLITAN SERVICE CORPORATION TO COORDINATE PUBLIC FUNCTIONS FOR METROPOLITAN AREAS. Metropolitan Affairs March 2 S 898 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY AN UNPAID SPECIAL COMMISSION RELA- TIVE -TO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND OF THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH PERTAINING THERETi. Transportation March 6 S 186- BILL ESTABLISHING A BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNERS, State Administration • H 338 BILL FURTHER REGULATING THE FILLING OR DREDGING OF CERTAIN uvET AREAS BORDERING COSTAL WATERS Harbors and Public Lands March 7 S{ gr ' BILL REQUIRING"NOTICF.`QF. LSSUAI4GE.O:F .L.IC"ENSE" ' ORMARIANOE .IN ZONING.BE_GIVEN TO CERTAIN PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND OTHERS . . Mercantile Affairs S 531 HOMEBUILDERS BILL PERTAINING TO RESTRICTICKS UPON LAND AVAILABLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 15, 000 S. F, LOTS Mercantile Affairs S 533 BILL CLARIFYING TI'" :9.:?PEAL PROVISIONS UNDER THE SU SDIVISION COAT.T ..OL LAvv Mercantile Affairs S 534 BILL CLARIFYING THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOUIr-D IN MODIFYING, AMEND-.-TU— OR RESCINDING APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLANS UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAVA. Mercantile Affairs • H 2417 HOMEBUILDERS BILL PERTAINING TO PERFORMANCE BONDS IN SUBDIVISION CONTROL Mercautile .Affairs March 7 H 2418 HOMEBUILDERS BILL TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE SECURITY IN SUBDIVISION CONTROL Mercantile Affairs H 2419 'HOMEBUILDERS BILL PROVIDING FOP. ORAL NOTICE • TO PLANNING BOARD OF COMP?..TION OF CONSTRUC- TION UNDER SUBDIVISION CONT'aOL Mercandle'A`fairs H 2420 HOMEBUILDERS BILL TO STUDY STANDARD FORMS FOR SUBDIVISION CONTROL' Mercantile A.".4ixs H 3469 BILL TO STUDY LAND USE CONTROL LAW Mercantile Affairs H 3798 BILL REGULATING THE SIZE OF DWELLING LOTS Mercantile Affairs H 3799 BILL REGULATING THE SIZE OF LOTS FOR FACTORY, INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES, Mercantile Affairs H 4064 BILL AUTHORIZING CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW Mercantile Affairs March 9 S 95 BILL REQUIRING PLANNING BOARDS TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER PROPOSED • ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY-LAWS ARE FILED BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD ' Mercantile Affairs S 516 BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER FORTY B OF THE GENERAL LAWS TO FURTHER DEFINE LIMITATIONS ON THE ASSESSMENTS AND THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS OF DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSIONS Mercantile Affairs S 517 BILL TO PROVIDE FOR AND LIMIT THE ACCUMULA- TION OF RESERVE FUNDS OF DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSIONS ' Mercantile Affairs S 518 BILL TO ENABLE DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSIONS TO BORROVv IN AN OF REVENUES FROM MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES. Mercantile Affairs S 536 BILL TO EXTEND THE'USE OF CONDOMINIUMS TO OFFICE BUILDINGS Mercantile Affairs H 234 BILL CONCERNING PARKING AT MOBILE HOME PARKS Mercantile Affairs • H 235 BILL CONCERNING SERVICES FOR MOBILE HOME PARKS Mercantile Affairs -2- i March 9 H 1466 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATICN AND STUDY BY THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF "COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATIVE TO THE ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BY TOWNS, CITIES, COUNTIES, -REGIONS AND STATE AGENCIES,} Mercantile Affairs H 2240 BILL DEFINING THE WORD LOT UNDER THE PROVI- SIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW Mercantile Affairs H 2620 RESOLVE PROVIDING'FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING PRIVILEGES ON REGIONAL PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS IN THE COMMONWEALTH Mercantile Affairs H 2621 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATIVE TO THE ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BY CITIES AND T0WNS Mercantile Affairs H 3032 BILL AUTHORIZING PLANNING BOARDS TO GRANT EXCEPTIONS TO A ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW, Mercantile Affairs H 3170 BILL AMENDING THE ZONING ENABLING ACT TO PERMIT CITIES AND TOWNS TO PROHIBIT USE VARIANCES, Mercantile Affairs H 3171 BILL AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO RELATE THEIR ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW TO A MASTER PLAN I . Mercantile Affairs H 3172 BILL AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO AMEND THEIR ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW TO CREATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS. Mercantile Affairs H 3173 BILL RELATIVE TO THE DEFINITION AND REQUIRE- MENTS OF A MASTER PLAN UNDER THE LAWS RELATIVE TO MUNICIPAL PLANNING. Mercantile Affairs H 3174 BILL AMENDING THE ZONING ENABLING ACT TO PERMIT CITIES AND TOWNS TO REQUIRE A THREE- FOURTHS TO AMEND A ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW WHEN THE PLANNINU BOARD RECOMMENDS • AGAINST THE AMENDMENT. Mercantile Affairs -3- a" March 9 H 3205 BILL REQUIRING THE UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN LIGHT AND TELEPHONE LINES IN NEWLY SUBDIVIDED AREAS. • Power and Light .H 3315 , BILL AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO ELECT A BOARD OF APPEALS ON ZONING, Mercantile Affairs H 3466 , RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO ZONING LAWS, Mercantile Affairs H 3467 BILL LIMITING PROCEEDINGS BY PERSONS AGGRIEVED BY ZONING LAWS AND AMENDMENTS Mercantile Affairs H 3639 BILL AUTHORIZING PLANNING BOARDS TO GRANT SPECIAL PERMITS UNDER THE ZONING LAW, Mercantile Affairs H 3796 ' BIJ;L TO EXEMPT MOBILE HOMES FROM ORDINANCES: OR BY-LAWS LIMITING DURATION OF RESIDENCY, Mercantile Affairs March 15 'S 577 ' BILL CREATING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS, SO CALLED, AND AUTHORIZING THE COMMONWEALTH AND ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS AND PUBLIC INSTRUMENTALITIES TO ACQUIRE SUCH EASEMENTS. Natural Resources S 580 BILL ESTABLISHING AN OPEN LAND RESERVATION „ PROGRAM FOR MASSACHUSETTS Natural Resources S 589 BILL TO ESTABLISH A OPEN LAND RESERVATION PROGRAM Natural Resources H,1709 BILL ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC LANDS REVIEW AND RESERVATION PROGRAM FOR THE COMMONWEALTH. Natural Resources -4- . . • -90axement ollwommegw and -9"O/Omml • JCa�e U��ce ��c���iz� T W. SOHUL NBERG COMMISSIONER 72227-13221 January 25, 1967 To: Planning Boards Boards of Appeal Consultants, Et Als Attached is a selected list of titles of legislative bills which the Division of Planning believes will be of interest to you. The list is categorized and contains the name of the sponsor . and the Legislative Committee to which the bill is referred. Hearing dates have not been announced but when they are, if time permits, notices will be sent to those whom we think should be notified. Feel free to call the Planning Division in regard to the progress or disposition of the legislation. _ Respectfully, T. W. Schulenberg Commissioner tt. t • • PLANNING S 576 BILL AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ON CITY AND TOWN PLANNING BOARDS. Edmund Ryan Municipal Finance S 898 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY AN UNPAID SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND OF THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH PERTAINING THERETO. Sens Cohen, et al Transportation H 1446 BILL ESTABLISHING THE OLD COLONY PLANNING COUNCIL. Rep. P M Murphy Labor & Industries H 3173 BILL RELATIVE TO THE DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF A MASTER PLAN UNDER THE LAWS RELATIVE TO MUNICIPAL PLANNING. Robert A Bowyer Mercantile Affairs / SUBDIVISION CONTROL •f�( S 533 BILL CLARIFYING THE APPEAL PROVISIONS UNDER THE X (/\ SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW Home Builders Assn. , et al Mercantile Affairs S 534 BILL CLARIFYING THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN MODIFYING, AMENDING OR RESCINDING APPROVAL_ OF DEFINITIVE PLANS UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. Home Builders Assn. , et al Mercantile Affairs H 2240 BILL DEFINING THE WORD LOT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. / Warr.en P. Ganley, et al Mercantile Affairs H 3205 BILL REQUIRING THE UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN LIGHT.AND TELEPHONE LINES IN NEWLY SUBDIVIDED AREAS. Rep Khachadoorian Power & Light REGIONAL PLANNING S 516 BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER FORTY B OF THE GENERAL LAWS TO FURTHER DEFINE LIMITATIONS ON THE ASSESSMENTS AND THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS OF DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSIONS., James McCormack, et al Mercantile Affairs S 517 BILL TO PROVIDE FOR AND LIMIT THE ACCUMULATION OF RESERVE FUNDS OF DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSIONS. Sen Conte, et al Mercantile Affairs -1- S 518 BILL TO ENABLE DISTRICT PLANNING COMMISSIONS TO BORROW IN ANTICIPATION OF REVENUES FROM MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES. • Sen Conte, et al Mercantile Affairs H 1956 SPECIAL REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT, THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION AND THE CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT AUTHORIZED (under Chapter 102 of the Resolves of 1966) TO MAKE AN INVESTIGA- TION AND STUDY RELATIVE TO THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE IN CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES IN THE COUNTY OF W ORCESTER. " Public Health V/ H 1969 BILL TO ASSIST AND DEVELOP REGIONAL PLANNING BY AND WITHIN COUNTIES. County Commissioners & Sheriffs Assn Counties H 2620 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING PRIVILEGES ON REGIONAL PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS IN THE COMMONWEALTH. Rep Dukakis, Sen Ames, et al Mercantile Affairs PLANNING AND ZONING S 95 BILL REQUIRING PLANNING BOARDS TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS • WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY-LAWS ARE FILED BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD. Sen McIntyre Mercantile Affairs H 1466 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATIVE TO THE ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BY TOWNS, CITIES, COUNTIES, REGIONS AND STATE AGENCIES. Charles W Eliot Mercantile Affairs H 2621 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT RELATIVE TO THE ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING BY CITIES AND TOWNS. Rep Dukakis, Sen Ames, et al Mercantile.Affairs V/ H 3032 BILL AUTHORIZING PLANNING BOARDS TO GRANT EXCEPTIONS TO A ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW. Robert A. Bowyer Mercantile Affairs ✓ H 4064 BILL AUTHORIZING CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE SUB_ DIVISION CONTROL LAW . Rep W'ojtkowski Mercantile Affairs ZONING •� S91 BILL REQUIRING NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF LICENSES OR VARIANCE IN ZONING BE GIVEN TO CERTAIN PUBLIC OFFICII:LS AND OTHERS. Sen Harmon Mercantile Affairs S 531 BILL PERTAINING TO RESTRICTIONS UPON LAND AVAILABLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS., Home Builders Assn. of Mass. , et al Mercantile Affairs (/ S 933 ORDER RELATIVE TO AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY THE LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF RESTRICTING THE ZONING POWER TO CITIES AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT AND CERTAIN RELATED MATTERS. Sen Donahue Senate Rules ✓ H 232 BILL RELATIVE TO THE DEFINITION OF TRAILERS IN'ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY-LAWS. Rep Grimaldi Mercantile Affairs H 391 BILL PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES INCURRED IN SUCCESSFUL APPEALS TO THE SUPERIOR COURT FROM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS' DECISIONS. Rep Brett Mercantile Affairs H 1320 BILL RELATIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF NEW AND SEPARATE • BUILDINGS FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Mass. Farm Bureau Fedn Agriculture H 1422 BLLL PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOSITION OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF ZONING ORDINANCES OR BY-LAWS. Edward W . Brooke, et al Judiciary H 3170 BILL AMENDING THE ZONING ENABLING ACT TO PERMIT CITIES AND TOWNS TO PROHIBIT USE VARIANCES. / Robert Bowyer Mercantile Affairs ✓ H 3171 BILL AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO RELATE THEIR ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW TOA MASTER PLAN. Robert A Bowyer Mercantile Affairs o� H 3172 BILL AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOW NS'TO AMEND THEIR ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW TO CREATE PLANNED.DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS. Robert A Bowyer Mercantile Affairs H 3174 BILL AMENDING THE ZONING ENABLING ACT TO PERMIT CITIES AND TOWNS TO REQUIRE A THREE-FOURTHS TO AMEND A ZONING ORDINANCE OR BY-LAW WHEN THE PLANNING BORAD RECOMMENDS AGAINST THE AMENDMENT. Robert A. Bowyer _ Mercantile Affairs • -3- H 3315 BILL AUTHORIZING CITIES AND TOWNS TO ELECT A BOARD OF APPEALS ON ZONING Rep Wojtkowski Mercantile Affairs H 3466 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY A • SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO ZONING LAWS Rep Belmonte Mercantile Affairs L/ H 3467 BILL LIMITING PROCEEDINGS BY PERSONS AGGRIEVED BY ZONING LAWS AND AMENDMENTS / Rep Coury Mercantile Affairs t/ H 3639 BILL AUTHORIZING PLANNING BOARDS TO GRANT SPECIAL PERMITS UNDER THE ZONING LAW. Rep Wotkowski Mercantile Affairs H 3798 BILL REGULATING THE SIZE OF DWELLING LOTS. Karl Haartz Mercantile Affairs ✓ H 3799 BILL REGULATING THE SIZE OF LOTS FOR FACTORY, INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES. Karl Haartz Mercantile Affairs FLOOD PLAIN H 95 BILL RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF FLOOD PLAINS Dept, of Public Health Natural Resources H. 1103 BILL PERMITTING CERTAIN LAND USE UNDER THE LAW • RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF FLOOD PLAINS. Rep Turner Natural Resources OUTDOOR ADVERTISING H 123 BILL TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONTROL OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ADJACENT TO THE INTERSTATE AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS AND FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH CONTROLS. Dept, of Public Works Mercantile Affairs f� H 811 BILL REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DIVISION, Rep Perrault Mercantile Affairs H 959 BILL REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DIVISION.. / Rep Bly Mercantile Affairs H 1239 BILL REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SIGNS BY THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DIVISION. Mass. Selectmen's Assn. , Inc, Mercantile Affairs • -4- } I51 ..i:.Pvl t,1 .' tY }f[1C+.'C} .� LIi �. - C.'vT: = 'f !. 'y ••. ,I t4,PT t % X' .•'S S • H 1459 BILL::FURTHE'R,REGULATING THE,.ISSUANC]9OF;-PERMITS`FOR- S4� f3 BILLBOARDS, SIGNS OR OTHER~ADVERTLSING'DEVICES'BY THE •dU <: JT1D'OOWADVERTISIIiG Q,ARDa;='.rE ,y{c,z :;rl{. y'w,r r.•n 1,.! Mercantile Affairs. Rep Curtiss br%l H 1460 BILL REQUIRING HEARINGS OF THE OUTDOOR'A'DV'ER'TISING BOARD G';REI"'A,T.IVEe'4TO.APPLICATIONS FOR A, PERMIT BE,HELD IN THE r u, s '..i 1 0 L A CITY OW.TOR FILING OBJFfGTIONe ?'` ui ilRep C:uLtie6:T�I'_IJ 1l<:t..t ,<,_ c, c ;MercantilefAffars :Sr1-. � / fl.'3.1 V H 1461 BILL REQUIRING THE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING BOARDtTO'HOID <: tasPUBLIC?HEARINGS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE;:OF A BILL BO:kAD LICENSE. Rep Curtiss TI • I ie`rcanine'Affdirs Cl'.1< it �X:T •.I H 1465 BILL!TO CONTROL';THE ERECTION AND-MAINTENANC E,:OF BILLBOARDS AND'OTHER OUTDOOR,ADVERTISING`DEVTCEIS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE OUTDOOR ADVER"TLSING BOARD .o'�Re McG3nn _;[Ei Mercantile Affairs " P'' Jry A .. v L V/ H 3637 BILL'REQIIIRING1THE•APPROVAL-OF;CITIES AND TOWNS PRIOR, MT•HE ISSUANCEEOFiPER'MITS;FOR SIGNS BY,THE OUTDOOR` '-A'DVERTISING,DIVISION};.I5z;-2 Rep Travaline n,.Mercantile Affairs . ii:Tir.ii'1 .(!LilL Jc�.:1-,'::.i.": r;•tt r.,•rij.-.cF: } f� H 3795 BILL. REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF CITIES'AND�TOWNS PRIOR TO • THE1SSUANCE OFA PERNITfF_OR,OUTDOORADVERTISING. ,I L{^ I r Mercanfile'Affair's" 'u JL':;..I.,:ii�t�lil�t F1.:;i F'£(Y CS TSIL i'.v:�. .�,•/'.i .'tar 'c'lU fR t .: 1• ,_i': .d :;;MISCELLANEOUS k YE.K:<`-J .13.�.k.i�Y S'T'i='r 1F4 .a�t :�'�l'( t ? q .'{� c. S C Ci _ .... J �121<' L f . .1 �S IO f1 .r FF< S 186';1 BILL'E5TABLISHING ABOARD_ OF,REGI5_T.RATION'-OF"PROFESIONAL .�l;is r (,a•et, 4t..it :' 5'_E COMMUNITYiPLANNERSn;,:{?tT Elliot L Richardson & Sen Ames State Administration ....Lc '. f:Ii S 482� BILL TO INCLUDE CONSERVATION LAND WITH PARKLAND AS TO TAKINGS'FOR kUGH-LvAYS OR PUBLIC U.TILITIESar A , <t.3 't= ' JudbcvaY . Ya . - �"lfx S 577 BILL CREATING CONSERVATION•EASEMENTS, 50 CALLED', AND AUT.HORIZING:THE COMMONWEALTH.AIi1D`ITS,,POLITICFII SUBDIVISIONS AND PUBLIC INSTRUMENTALITIES TO ACQUIRE'S UGI"I EASEMENTS. Natural Resources (ji Asir t; S 797 BILL DIRECTING THE MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICA'I. COMMISSION TO F?REPAREI'COMPREHENSIV�E STATfEW.IDE HIS',T' ORI CSURVEYS,AND< PLANS FOR THE P,URPOSFi,OF QUAL, YING- TlE CONi14ONW;EA1I:TH' FOR CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS.. ?? " '`,•4 Kevin H White, et al State Administratiott • S 845 BILL RELATIVE TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LANDS, Sen Barrus " Taxation S 580 BILL ESTABLT.SHING AN OPEN LAND RESERVATION PROGRAM FOR MASSACHUSETTS James McCormack Natural Resources -5- H 82 BILL ESTABLISHING.THE MASSACHUSETTS GEOLOGICAL COMMISSION Dept.'of Natural Re'sourcea = State Administration ✓ H 116 BILL TO CLARIFY_ THE PROVISIONS FOR PROOF'OF EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC WAY - .' - Dept. of Public Works , Highways and Motor Vehicles H 119 BILL TO REGULATE THE ESTABLISHMENT, 'MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS,OF JUNKYARDS ALONG THE INTERSTATE AND , PRIMARY SYSTEMS AND TO ESTABLISH CONDITIONS FOR THE GRANTING OF A JUNK DEALER LICENSE OR A MOTOR VEHICLE JUNK LICENSE' _ .. u< { . . •, Dept. of Public. Works j' " Highway and Motor Vehicles H 120 BILL PROVIDING. FOR THE RESTORATION, PRESERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SCENIC BEAUTY AND HISTORIC,SITES , WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS OF THE COMMONWEALTH 1 `" } . "Dept. of Public Works Highways and Motor Vehicles H 236 BILL PROVIDING,FORTTHE'CREATION AND OPERATION OF : .; METROPOLITAN SERVICE CORPORATIONS TO PROVIDE AND COORDINATE CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICES AND FUNCTIONS FOR METROPOLITAN AREAS. t Rep. M. J. Harrington Metropolitan Affairs H 338 BILL FURTHER REGULATING THE FILLING OR DREDGING OF • CERTAIN WET AREAS BORDERING COASTAL WATERS Rep Brett Harbors and Public Lands H 393 BILL TO AUTHORIZE AND DIRECT THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION TO ACQUIRE THE SITE OF THE BUNKER HILL QUARRY AND ADJACENT PORTION OF THE GRANITE RAILWAY IN QUINCY BY, GIFT, PURCHASE OR EMINENT DOMAIN AS APART OF THE BLUE HILL RESERVATION Rep Brett ` Metropolitan Affairs H 529 BILL CREATING A DIVISION OF URBAN AFFAIRS=WITHIN THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE TO ASSIST THE CITIES AND TOWNS OF THE COMMONWEALTH IN OBTAINING FEDERAL FINANCIAL 'ASSISTANCE • - i E- Reps Peck & Shinberg Federal Financial Assistance H 1116 BILL REQUIRING THE FENCING OF SWIMMING POOLS, Rep Hollis Public Safety H 1309 BILL;DETERMINING THE :TIME IN WHICH A 'BY-LAW MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Maes Selectmen's Assn., Inc. Towns I , •✓ H 1335 BILL PROVIDING FOR THE HOLDING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE CITY COUNCILS BY A COM .ITTEE THEREOF IN CERTAIN CASES Rep Bradley Cities H 1477 BILL TO AUTHORIZE AND DIRECT THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION TO ACQUIRE THE SITE OF THE BUNKER HILL QUARRY AND ADJACENT PORTION OF THE GRANITE RAILWAY IN QUINCY BY GIFT, PURCHASE OR EMINENT DOMAIN AS A PART OF THE BLUE HILL RESERVATION. Bunker Hill Monument Assn Metropolitan Affairs H 1572 BILL ESTABLISHING AN OPEN LAND RESERVATION PROGRAM FOR THE PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACES, IN PRIVATE OWNERSHIP, THROUGH POSTPONEMENT OF PAYMENT OF PART OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAXES ON "CLASSIFIED OPEN LAND" UNTIL THE RESTRICTIONS ON OPEN USE OF SUCH LANDS ARE CHANGED OR RELAXED, Charles W Rliot Taxation H 1573 RESOLVE PROVIDING FOR AN INVESTIGATION AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL UNPAID COMMISSION RELATIVE TO THE CENTRALIZED COLLECTION, BY THE COMMONWEALTH, OF PROPERTY TAXES ON INDUSTRIAL PLANTS AND RE-DISTRIBUTION AMONG NEIGHBORING MUNICIPALITIES ACCORDING TO A FORMULA OF NEED, Charles W. Eliot Taxation • H 1709 BILL ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC LANDS REVIEW AND RESERVATION PROGRAM FOR THE COMMONWEALTH, Rep Dolan Natural Resources H 705 BILL CREATING A TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY IN THE CITY OF NEW BEDFORD AND ENVIRONS Edward F. Harrington, et al Transportation • -7- • MR.&MRS . A GALLANT 52 SUPl0,1IT STREET 10 FEBRUARY 1967 TO: THF: PLAITITING BOARD GEN TLE'. ITEN , We are abutters to the proposed , extension of Witchcrafjr Heights ,with one of the access roads in an out being ours. Having been unable to attend the public hearing held last weekdae to unavoidable ci.rcumstanees ,my wife and myself, must register our feelings toward this access road . As we understand it the roadway would be widenedfrom the present approximate 15 feet at my property line to 40 feet. We realize that it would be tapered to meet the existing street. Our main concerntherefore is the saftey of our children(three ) and their little friends who often times play in the front m d side yard . Exemple ;An automoble leaving the projectclimbs a hill , the driver accelerates thenhe is onto as narrow road and could conceivably have to • veer to his left onto my front or side lawn, should he meet another automobile entering Summit from STiuth.This Gentlemen is to us , @ause for grave concern. We urge you to give it every consideration. Thank You Sincerly UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND KINGSTON Curriculum in Community Planning and Area Development The Graduate School Washburn Hall February 27, 1967 Salem Planning Board City of Salem Salem,, Massachusetts 01971 Gentlemen: I am writing in request of information concerning historic preservation planning and implementation in Salem. I an especially interested in the role of local preservation groups in the area's preservation planning. What are your mechanics and methods of conducting area building inventories? Might it be possible to obtain copies of your field survey formes that are used in these inventories? What approach has been adopted in funding your area's historic preservation planning activities - especially your building inventories? I am asking all of these questions in order to properly initiate a classroom experiment here on the methods of planning for historic preservation of urban areas. Any suggestions and assistance that you might be able to offer would greatly aid our educational project. Further, I would appreciate receiving any Literature - for example., "Historic Area Study" - or suggestions for additional contacts. Thank you in advance for your courtesy! Sincerely, Kenneth E. Corey Associate Professor Zip code number 02881 i g (fitu of 'Salem, 'fflttssar4usetts �` �'� �lttnning �nttrD • k''ounrt.a'° Mallet 0. drnp, Mr. Cberalb IS. ArClartllp t licbael �askafvski 34 C[tlurrll o*treet ,Albert P. Vitroff �$nlem, gassarllusetts 3Ragmunb 3[. �$fueeueg Hon. Kevin B. Harrington, e y Ta4,cO wv of l� State House, � A Boston, Massachusetts Con���M r A0 P Dear Senator : / F � The Salem Planning Board has reviewed the provisions of billsA slated for legislation. We feel they are beneficial, and we wish to orXr2_1e4 take the position we are in favorlof these bills. We hope that you as our legal representative will vote in favor if they appear before your body. (List numbers and titles of said bills ) 4.r We wish to register oppositi n t the following bills for the reasons stated : At � �,� ,tCgr� JN olr- H 3315--"An act author zing ties Town to elect-aboard of Ap- peals on Zoning" Bec se of the pol�it ' al melte`;gip having a board of appeal form group by elect�e ethods, we feel that the public interest would not be best served. met Boards of appeal in cities and-tie are appointed by the Mayo , and with few exceptions consist of people who are well qualified by professional training or their own personal business to judge on matters pertaining to zoning. We do not wish to infer that persons elected would not have these qualifications. However, we fear the elective method would serve as purel a popularity contest rather than appoinging boards who could ? udge matters in proper perspectiv . In our opinion, it would be similar to that in some states where %udges are elected. In many instances this does not best serve the public. NU vytmM (S _5_('?-)"An act requiring Planning .Boards to hold public hearings within Zv? it y days after proposed zoning ordinances or by-laws are filed before e Planning Board. We do not feel the provisions of this act would serve in the best public tifte>reet interest because of the limitation of t:; S days. In the majority of cases OM most city planning boards have,usually required research of the physical characteristics and ques- tions pertaining to law. If such a hearing had to be held within a g day limitation, no planning board would be able to function properly. Ina it would appear that such a provision would call for a multi- �,,�,, ,Sde tuof public hearings which would greatly hamper the planning board �O� t l � . If a period of time were desirable, we feel • that it should be far greater than the days et4up stipulated, or at least 120 days. S 5 _�"Bill clarifying the appeal provisions under the subdivision control _ 2 _ 4kaw". We feel that if this bill is approved and made part of the subdivision control law, that it will more or less open the flood gates for the reentering of appeals, and it would also allow the delinquent to appeal in his own good time. We do not think this is a good provision. Cis +fir _ ��� y A/ o r Coiti2G.Cr TAviT Qr 1,1csrcD 7-0 Co RZI)vC AG (_ 7/)C G.r To T,,, C 4rrC4r /O/./ 04 TaG �aAiZO -- � aG �0A2� /4 7'4C.� i at? ✓Ccr/ ov r co (d _ 7/,/4C4 ALL 7.41 T 4- Cr .roe SGL// 0 ir- .d G.otic r°n Tam V4 2 � ay. f ��t� c • i C,n /` • � � OX i pwiry a Tltty of4�lem,5 u;., :Fwrz Planning �3nttrkt Huhn A'i. Brag, ',�fr_ �eralD 0I_ �IcQIarfhg ilichael #`laebafneki 34 (ElItnrril _£4treet Albert P. Vitraff fafem, fflazsarliuzettz �2agmnnD �. �fneeneg To His Honor, Francis X. Collins, Mayor of Salem, and The Honorable City Council : Gentlemen: During the year 1966, the City Planning Board held regular meetings at the Planning Board office on the first and third Thursdays of each month. At these meetings which are open to the public, all applications are acted upon, and without exception, at every meeting, applications relating to the Subdivision Rules and Regulations are received and acted upon. • The majority of such applications fall under the category of Form A. i.e. "Plans which are believed not to constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Regulations". Approximately thirty (30) Form "a's" were endorsed by the Board by meeting the requirements . Four were not endorsed because the Board felt the lots involved were sub- divisions. Two of these applications were later refiled as Subdivision applications. Two applications for subdivision were filed on Form "B's", i.e. "Plans submitted in a preliminary form for tentative approval as a Subdiv- ision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Regulations". One ap- plication was rejected because of lack of information. The other applica- tion was approved. Shortly after that, the second applicant submitted a "Definitive" plan accompanied by a Form "C" application, i.e. "Definitive Plan of Land deemed a Subdivision under the Subdivision Control Regulations" which was approved. • During 1966 and right up to the time of the submission of this re- port, the Board has held interviews with several prospective developers regarding apartment "clusters" and/or business/commercial developments in Salem. Some ideas presented left a favorable impression with the Board. A few proposals were presented in such a way that the Board was left with the impression that a veritable "Pandora's Box" was being left for a "Hydra-headed Monster" to open and unravel. Another problem presented to the Board was the proposed development of the land owned by the Associated Grocers, Inc. , (the "Lead Mills" ) , on upper Lafayette Street near the Marblehead line. Although, insofar as the Salem Zoning Ordinance stipulated, the matter was not within the jur- isdiction of the Planning Board, the proposed development because it in- cluded a proposed new street, would eventually have to be approved by the Board. The layout of the entire development was predicated first on the assumption that the Town of Marblehead would grant certain concessions, and secondly upon the acquisition by the applicant of waterfront land now owned by the Boston and Maine Railroad. Counsel for the Associated Grocers, Inc. , has advised the Board that to date neither question has been settled, so this development has not been finalized. In previous reports the Board has made reference to various City Or- dinances. In the past few years revisions in the following ordinances and regulations have been prepared for study and discussion: - Subdivision Control, etc. , Building Code, and Zoning Ordinance, etc. After considerable consultation and research, the Board has reached the conclusion that all of the ordinances should be constantly reviewed and updated. The Board has in its review found that many ordinances now in effect conflict, and in some cases supersede, one another. Because of this, the Board is now preparing • - 3 - certain recommendations to amend some of the ordinances, particularly those referring to advertising, building, subdivision, streets, etc. At the time of this report, these recommendations are being printed in a "preliminary" form. They will then be presented to the various department heads and the City Council for review, after which they will be formally presented with the Board's recommendations. At the end of the calendar year 1966, the outcome of the renewal plan "Heritage Plaza East" could not be determined. Because of this, many future studies by the Board are being held in abeyance, pending the final approval of the plan. Salem's "Workable Program" which has already been completed and approved for 1966, will have to be yearly updated and approved by HUD • (Department of Housing and Urban Development ). The 1966 Capital Improve- ments program has been completed and is now being printed. If' the "Workable Program" is to be continued, a review of the "Neighborhood Analysis" must be submitted by the Board this year, (1967 ) . As the Workable Program will be an annual matter, the Board is now re- viewing all programs under the jurisdiction of HUD. The Board intends to apply for a supplementary appropriation when the HUD requirements are fully analyzed. At this time, it seems that the updating of the "Neighborhood Analysis" will have the highest priority. It is possible that an appropria- tion of seven to eight thousand dollars will be requested, some of which might be reimbursible. Unfortunately, the Board chairman has been confined at home for sev- eral weeks because of illness. Although a great many duties could be handled 10 by telephone or by home meetings, as Chairman, I wish to express my thanks to Board Members Gerald McCarthy, Michael Paskowski, Albert Pitcoff, and Raymond Sweeney, for carrvin- or she work of the Board W4thout interruption. l - 4 - I also wish to express my thanks to Mrs. Christine Callahan, our secre- tary, for the extra work that she has done to keep up with our agenda. Respectfully submitted, �i John M. Gray, Jr. , ; firman` � rCrI2r ! - 0o✓ Cv jou j�� � . a � 2a /-r car T/:lfr Op u9LL0 }�/'aG'E,n/ to rrr.c B�� .eeo a<�:. e.� ; ✓r-,r2w r< — J�cC��c eo,zaecr D td IDS��CC-C- IIy C+ /I rJO ��✓lvGi Jn+ !'i C� ry� - /--v,. . / ) riri_our_ __.La _�a� Cfi A=�p�—�'- --� r.��'Z�.-_�iK� r/�.�•— . 1 -- �•-�'-.-1-.. c-�G_fr-r--�-h/-tC.w--!f�Z4.__�C-G.L�UCSN_o_r.__�L CC_ti_5._:! i u�_�_ . Cx_9.2r_�S_!c_H a_<v%�o-�•--- _� .�,_C_u c,_.r r� c_a_r,--/`�_ ------ ----- / ` ,,� .2..0-----'3.7 - m•f,G %L_N__C_--- /"_4 G. iZ�__ u R� Lei TS. -- G✓ �2---C4�__ i3e. c-4u f_�—T N A?o.r v-'yu , rro /yr -- -- _ ------uhf'--<--=-c ..r r_o �r S'.. -- -------- - ------ ---- 13, L.4 ,v fSUd5!eh-tYTE,t2. __/_�____:I. ____--__.___.%J_iZ-C-C.//�1_/yY.q_.2yt-�c�_.2/h r P/2_r�C_W_T t�-T• i[�G �. p_/o.?J r/.� t_ Af �- —�u R_2( V r_S� H_ CJ r ri✓irr T_iy c _ r»_C -- -- --- �/����'.t_c�rC,cjrr�=�-t----.�E✓Cc r,e.n _>t3_ecazv r'C- _crf Gd CK._e.r�_ ---CN_r o eir._-�r< oti .�.—T?✓L- 6'7 U.�R_ _�j�pL i C-1 riC, WAS' A/p_J•?�u_rD,.---- Ju_a<z�-�j_✓r�s.c,c rv.�r- T-/✓L�/r�.c ��r� � �l'/'_`' ` �-"-'°/'----- _ - /N :J'/ UG—��-.9_4.—AC Ca u —AJ7pG-r.C.i Croy ✓ �., I-GJ=r 4r i-1 UgOidlfi G•�• _.J_ U f�'_/J'-1_1J_/ f�._C_N_ - O /✓ T2Q G_ C_GJ U c. T 1 O N S '41t c'.0 4J 4 r, __.. — —w_2��� G,>j G" �'T ,y_/✓_/.�iZ�C�s r (��—i o_-%V_G.- -- -- �'mC- a✓L-j C.—__Sv_fi'sn �Ss% off—G_Jt-_ r -i� c ox= i-N SdIlt- eA • e r� vG --'� v e G OAC¢_ t 2t_C_�_Z-2r[,_C—_�7 p�J r2 rin t4r — C c r, --- - -4E-v4-[ o-� �'-G�v rf/_,_v_---� c En-,-•----�c,_i�_f, i_��..�i s'----- %iNG__6Uq_ OL. -/Y C'0 a/oGt _ CrG ��IZp`� V SAGS --. —._— W c.sZ_E.---- ✓.lZ-�. SZy j'GO__._/.�/_.__Sufis_. _.0_---�`''-�'��' ---�`v.�7�--✓-NL'-- Oil'-'Z.O //�Z2� r.�_BC_C/� ! ?✓✓_v_O��`s �u x 4 c.✓4r r����vC C._EF%- - z�),v_s--.GtZ—i o erioei� .f/,1ie� ✓G/HortiG�G-- i?� r3GG« RLfrCl� i� 6/ l r�G/ai?_c�?_o-t6-U Uu _77 r:-i I- Gl -- - -i2oCC2r /AlC_ �� 40C.G_f� r ' _—�24f/J�JUC_f_t S_TC��� L.OTGO jliG — --.-- L»_.7_T_T t_C'— _A_f_w o 7i gLr�l! Tid .�✓ T/r_G_�/u Q Sri C_i i o ----------- -O-c--TV C-__ _q�CI_,v�. _Co—/J 6r1p1/.��i^�✓_f.__I2_2oo_tJ rGo --- -O --%-�°�o s_�A__N_E.cJ S_T_'�Z,G�_LJ U�✓G_ (J �v f-.4 T v _i_G(y. La�9vG T o —- R_k.:rJ���o ,2 o v E.� $j T�r_G,_ -�o.� �2©,—/�✓L. L�y o�r -�� - j/i L• ,Gari 2C_.--{�t_ R L u e ni L%�r�4LLA'S_— —_— T IrET_A_S_s_c±rr_i/rte iio%, T/rte-r _7',v�•—,/ a4�_w o f r /b/?�4ce%/(,q_o---.. — ilk 4_�t—str/ori—_GF cv �trcn'j X� r� � � g /� D /VOL" ar�atr� _ -- - -- - 7— T4, � Srat �_wr� —_l_<G iC�G—_�L it iC_ PUn o. /46c- lo y_Gi - QrG v C-�-O�•�n� fir T /_•�-4_S—�/_6/—/.�e.Eu-�/N i C ( Z,_C_D� -- 7A/4- HO A Co ✓_>>A_oK.__ 2eF.Gc�GaCE _�-o /rA�2iour C.ry C✓,20/ �c/.v �vCF.�-, _—//✓_T_/±t/�ry_5..- 4-41 7 Ams THE Foc �ct,�/NG �12�/ yA �ICGS - ------ -- - - / o - R4aoc--17ePA, f -.I,4 rt/ _ �-G.c/4a �Gu�!2Gv±rcDg C _ _-.._ �.__.�_ �_._ -._._ _-T-_ �___ _.___ T_-__ ___ .^__ -._._ ____�, _______ r_ ___ ____"_"___�__..____..._____. C, o_r�-G� fNIu__CC__ =Er_C__. .— �ii_f.w____.A�'_r_L%Z- ----L�.N_S_rO_C_L�!_C3_C_G—_G_O_/✓-S-u-6-T-it-T_i6-L�/_----- - _- - C_o_i✓C.CuSi_oi�__ -)-UA_r�_ACC. T��C_. cs��cwiJ_,vC_Cf,tN_oc�c.j___ 1 . 7 _ — --- -- —�-'✓C _lJ oii_+Z_o w4 S --'-rr i rs iZe v-rGc✓.r- G u a rJ r .v .e_r._ i _ —�,v Sin-i �__�/�S_E_S�--Sv��E ��:Ea�_0t✓C-_�tNC :'�v_C_..2. % ECS�✓ Sf_ ore _L /ri 1 rr�_ C7�11?U_LS NoCv I/e�lc zt cC j_T_�io tL _ - R_CCrZrUG u- rc /] /nr��f3r��urrr_csN _ . - --- -7-/��f_L—c2_a`�c_oin G"N _O-.�1-T_io_NS---A__2�L.-rS/-o_c.�f,�f!!✓G°------------ /C-0 em -- /C0em /•v Gt.__43!G,_C.__� _.. -,Arw o -T/J C -% [ y--L O c� c�C C._ fele t r G CIL i C_cc-ellM C W 91i T!C)r✓_ 7 L G -C%C i/!— 12 yf�l - 7-Y/-C D u T jc�u /vi G r> c i�r.Co—i_Z u E r✓ a c �.v v -- ---_e/!Z _��Z� T�f_G_C-�A2�1 +[✓arr CouG_/� Noi i3-C r�Gi-�C.?ryr �ti.ED,-. Al __-----1✓-�,C/f U 5 c.___ Ox T!J/ ✓J I_QiJ� u T - - - -T-A/4c_ -�t3A �'� _ N�)o _Ta ��N�Vh'_C).aticr=/�{r�gra(;'_ T_tiC_ _i'"_iN_a_C.._ _/✓�/?.2oc�.rc -OF--- - - j/✓K— _CQ<�'--�A_G_Gna._`_t_ _Lt/ o2gr?CF __� 2n �eo�i t✓vrer/- - - __�/�li(_t AG_2t.!i-`-�J---'3_G.f. �-_C c�-ir. ��- G_G[.�l✓_ir�-A��.?��ve o �-off_ . — -_--.�--_.-. —�N O --./S—NOW_ R L./�G_. -_�iZ�LT.�,_�•__--�/�_r NC__—._-�a�Z/C q 9_ZC _R 4 C-2 'du Ae Ue( 19!—/I_h. re G._,'Z_ _ /I r(—�d .f Rte_—_i_S A/c, vre t✓ /,v_C;__-- --- —�[-G._/�[Z O (e ,Q/d_iY!_f._—_'✓ lr_O L,i:_.—y 4.C.—/ U K-( f=/ C T/ O r.,� a F �� v (_�. _ .. �r To -- _ --- -!J- � i2u�/2/./r!�,c. __LJ_E/�C .V 1_'u_C-/-/�U__Q_i�'e_4_v�,2_�t..mt_[✓_-T___ -- ���__ c°�_c- __ _ q,v_�y_c./8��._�r---r4.r_r�/,,_t__•� seem r_--- ---- - - TLS r> J%✓C-- ��' P_9_T C uF�T-NG ry /� EICu_c3Uir[ro�9 - - - - -�v�tg►� S.t_ L t �_/c_C _�/r1 v G --P-4 E-- // [ C 4 r- 0-,z f 2_,2f4 CU--- ---- T v c�'G O o _-_- �CJ G_C,i(�Z f GJ!G_C.__/.9.e.-/2_e_G✓L fi LO mar ._ - r --- s'o _�'G oF_ c✓ v_ e�—/Yi . �_v_r t3� _ -,_ry,�'u 2r' IeC..G - r—.c Tuc - ------ _- --N7s /ACL/✓ CC.vY /a/Go dr 4,6,h? fvZ-S-G 14C- 4) C-4 44)C.f s' g�Cz_v tE_ -off itt_<�_ ss . _ _c_r{� o v_e_w "� ij C2 -r /'z N/ -/.7-L)-i-[- -- --- -- - ---- i -- - - - - - -- - _ - -- -------- — - - n_ r7 ?"10 sir/_ _.'ys—1rh1--� zrbry i re2/'>Jj/ 7+ /Y/:;7r'j/ _ cry/T�=�o5�% -✓-Y,ro,g.:�/:I - >e oaJ� ----- I� � C •/' G d" �J -- 3 s f�rtU of §�)a(eiit, r4EMsscrchusejt9 • �Tfs�`��r� �(�nlnin� �nttrl nR.r rns oc°" ,`�uhn 1i9. bran. `Jc. 06A6 (T. Ah&rthq 11liehod paskn(ushi 34 QIhurrh Street ,Albert R. TMcu[i _ oSalcm, n_ ia5snchuseitu rIaLimuub 3f. ?6(v cenek To His Honor, Francis X. Collins, Mayor of Salem, and The Honorable City Council : Gentlemen: During the year 1966, the City P1 nning Board held regular meetings at the Planning Board office, on Thursdays Without exception, at every meeting applications relating to the Subdivision Rules and^Regulations are received and acted upon. U.0 ;.u„Cj o M.C... l MA"✓i .i/L Nom"/tNlw+.�+,/v�, -�W.L..t�r�,r✓tZe-C�=�tj Tti.�7.�..e✓vN .!-✓-/ he maority of such applications fall under the category of Form A, i.e. "Plans which are believed not to constitute a subdivision within the • meaning of the Subdivision Control Regulations". Approximately thirty (30) Form "A"'s were endorsed by the Board by meeting the requirements. Four Form "A" applications were not endorsed because the Board felt the lots involved were subdivisions. Two of these applications were later refiled as Subdivision applications. Two applications for subdivisions were filed on Form "B's", i.e. "Plans submitted in a preliminary form for tentative approval as a Subdiv- ision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Regulations". One ap- plication was rejected because of lack of information. The other applica- tion was approved. Shortly after that , the second applicant submitted a "Definitive" plan accompanied by a Form "C" application, i.e. "Definitive Plan of Land deemed a Subdivision under the Subdivision Control Regulations" which was approved. 2 During 1966, and right up to the time of the submission of this report, the Board has held interviews with several prospective developers regarding apartment "clusters" and/or business/commercial developments in Salem. Some ideas presented left a favorable impression with the Board. A few proposals were presented in such a way that the Board was left with the impression that a veritable "Pandora's Box" was being left for a "Hydra-headed Monster" to open and unravel. Another problem presented to the Board was the proposed development of the land owned by the Associated Grocers, Inc. , (the "Lead Mills" ) , on upper Lafayette Street near the Marblehead line. Although, insofar as the Salem Zoning Ordinance stipulated, the matter was not within the jurisdiction of the Planning Board, the proposed development, because it included a proposed new street, would eventually have t p` PP �� by the Board. The layout of the entire development was p e"d o he assumption that ±hg_oTown of Marblehead would grant certain con e�ns andaa . acquisitionAof waterfront land now owned by the Boston and Maine Railroad. Counsel for the Associated Grocers, Inc. , has advised the Board that to date, neither question has been settled, so this development has not. been finalized. In previous reports, the Board Wmade reference to various City Ordin- ".0U0 r 1tA%r ances. In the p st few yeaarrs,Athe�l following lowing ordinances and regulations have �fllt0� 0�Q'{w oiiAA - Subdivision Control, etc. , Building been c Code, Zoning Ordinance, etc. After considerable consultation and research, the Board has reached the conclusion that all of the ordinances should be constantly reviewed and updated. The Board has, in its review, found that in effectow conflict, and in some cases r superseded one an- many ordinances now n recommendations other. Because of this, the Board is now preparing certai - 3 - to amend some of the ordinances particularly those referring to advertising, Wilding, subdivision, streets, etc. At the time of this report, these rec- ommendations are being printed in a "preliminary"form. They will then be presented to the various department heads and the City Council for review, after which they will be formally presented with the Board's recommendations. At the end of the calendar year 1966, the outcome of the renewal plan "Heritage Plaza East" could no jbe determined. Because of this, many future studies by the Board held in abeyance, pending the final approval of the plan. Salem's "Workable Program" which has already been completed and ap- proved for 1966, will have to be yearly updated and approved by HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development ) . The 1966 Capital Improvements program has been completed and is now being printed. If the "Workable Program" is to be continued, a review of the "Neighborhood Analysis" must be submitted by the . Board this year, (1967 ) . As the Workable Program will be an annual mzttggp, the Board is now review- . ,.. ing all programs under the jurisdiction of HUD. The Board intends to apply for a supplementary appropriation when the HUD requirements are fully analyzed. At this time, it seems that the updating of the "Neighborhood Analysis" will have the highest priority. It is possible that an appropriation of seven to eight thousand dollars will be requested, some of which might be reimbursible. Unfortunately, the Board chairman has been confined at home for several weeks because of illness: ' 'AltRough � great many duties could be handled by telephone or by home meetings, as Chairman, I wish to express my thanks to Board Members, Gerald McCarthy, Michael Paskowski, Albert Pitcoff, and Raymond Sweeney for carrying on the work of the Board without interruption. I also wish to express my thanks to Mrs.rChristine. Callahan, our secretary, for the extra work that she has done to keep up with our agenda. Respectfully submitted, John ray, �r. , ai.rman THIS SIDE OF CARD IS FOR ADDRESS U.S. Of TACE vose,otl A. Sullivan,- !)ea'n ' Graduate and Continuing Studies Galen State College Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Ur3;an Renewal Seminar Director, Urban Renewal sairinar: I plan to attend the sera' iner'meetings starting April 12, (No fees involved in attendance) nave address position phone 1 • A � �i, �LIGLY/ l%���u�yv Q� J��///� 4 DIVISION OF GRADUATE ANDCONTINUINGSTUDIES FREDERICK A. MEIER -` PRESIDENT March 29, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. Planning Board e 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: May we extend a cordial invitation to participate in a special seminar to be conducted by Salem State College on the topic of Urban Renewal, starting Wednesday, April 12, 1967 and extending for a period of ten weeks. Operating under a grant from the Higher Education Facilities Commission for programs of Community Service and Continuing Education under Title I, Higher Education Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-329), the • college has planned a series of meetings for officials most directly concerned with Urban Renewal problems. The enclosed circular provides a listing of the tonics to be discussed during the coming weeks. Under the direction of the Center for Economic Affairs and the sponsorship of the colleee's Division of Continuing Studies, we are hoping to make a first step in providing service to surrounding communities concerning problems close to the communities involved. It is the earnest hone of President Frederick A. Meier that the college will be able to expand the present effort into a continuing program of service to surrounding cities and towns. A successful program in this first venture might well lead to an expanded pro- gram of community discussions aimed at the solution of problems on a regional basis. May we hear from you on the enclosed reply card, indicating name and mailing address of intended participants and any additional personnel from your office you may wish to include. Yours very truly, �_ . L,�� • Joseph A. Sullivan, Graduate Dean Seminar Director S" ` STATE COLLEGE AT SALEM 9 )CA r,0 36 �= SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS •` S DIVISION OF CONTINUING STUDIES ies and CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AFFAIRS Program for Urban Renewal Seminar - 1967 APRIL 12 Greetings—President Frederick A. Meier "PROGRAMS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT" Speaker: Marvin Siflinger, Area Coordinator Renewal Assistance Administration, H.U.D. (New York) APRIL 20 "PLANNING FOR URBAN RENEWAL" Isadore Candeub,Candeub, Fleissig and Associates A.I.P. President APRIL 26 "PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL VALUES" Robert J.Kerr,II,Consultant Corinthian Conservation Co.,Newport,R. I. MAY 3 "CITIZEN'S ROLE IN URBAN RENEWAL" Moderator: Joseph Courtney, Director Boston University Area Development Center Panel: Rev.Paul V.Donovan,Lynn Citizens Action Committee Morris Fleissig, Candeub,Fleissig and Associates • Rev.T.Thomas Boates,Jr.,Beverly Citizens Action Committee MAY 10 "RELOCATION AND URBAN RENEWAL" James O'Neil,Relocation Director Lynn Redevelopment Authority MAY 17 "MARKET FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT" William Ballard,W. B. Ballard Co. MAY 24 "REHABILITATION IN URBAN RENEWAL" Fred Springer, Massachusetts Housing Corporation John Flynn,Director,Federal Housing Administration MAY 31 TO BE ANNOUNCED ,JUNE 7 "PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT IN URBAN RENEWAL" John Mahoney,Development Corporation of America ,JUNE 14 TO BE ANNOUNCED Seminar Director: Dean Joseph A.Sullivan, Grad. Division, Salem State College Coordinator: Eugene A. Calabro,Director, Center for Economic Affairs Assisted by Staff of the Center Place of Meetings: STUDENT UNION LOUNGE, SALEM STATE COLLEGE Times of Meetings: 7:30 P.M., WEDNESDAYS (Except for Thursday, April 20 Meeting) Moderator: Mr.John Barrett,Executive Director • Salem Redevelopment Authority ��,coxmirn. nJ y,Q ofttlem, assttt use##s • �>r w Planning Poarb 3alirt A_ (Gray, jr_ April 11, 1967 Oeralh T. Ar@larft gicilael vaskataski 34 OI4=4 *reet ,Albert X1_ Witraff f6alem, Pnssacliusetts �l2ngmana �_ �fneeneg New England Telephone, Massachusetts Electric Company, 24 Norman Street, 25 River Street, Salem, Mass. Beverly, Mass. Atten: Salem Engineer William L. Reuell, Dist. Supt. Dear Sir: We are enclosing copies of proposed amendments to the sub- division control regulations. We are forwarding them to you for • review, our Y , with particular reference to underground utilities. Very truly yours, JMG:cc U Chairman a April 129 1967 . Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk,. City Hall$ Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on April 6, 1967, it was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required"on the following described• plan 1.. Applicant - DiBiase Realty Trust, 25 Acorn Street, Malden, Mass. 21Location and Description - 7.2 Acres of land off Highland Avenue, Proctor Street and Hillside Avenue 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Very truly yours, i MP;sc eri r Ctg of 'SttXem, �negollmiS e' �`" � Ittnntztg 4 Y cE'�,, 5 OfFIR 34 C4=4 Street FORMAttlem, ttssttchusefks APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ----__-_-__March_23_t_...............19-67 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- both ___bothlots shown an__plan_ have _f rontac,Ie__onublic__way_____ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant --------DiBiase Realty-Trust Address 25 Acorn- Street_ Malden Massachusetts 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _ rtes__&_Towers__EngineeTing- Coip_____________________________ Address -6 -Fairview Avenue, Swampscott , Massachusetts ------- --------- 3. Deed of property records in _ _--___-__-________________________________Registry Book ------------ Page ---------------------------- 4. Location and Property: ----Description of Pr e "2 Acresof land off Highland_Avenue_, p ---- - - -- - - Proctor Street and Hillside Avenue. DiBIASE REALTY UST By 9igtrahereeF9wner - 1 - --------- ----------------------------- nt A S Address 7Q_Wash[ _ngton______ reet_- __Salem_--------- Air INSTRUCTIONS TO. DELIVERING EMPLOYEE ❑ Show to whom and Show to whom, date,andDeliver ONLY date delivered 11addresswhere delivered - ❑ to addressee (Additional charges required far these services) RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below. REGISTERED P. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Mutt always befilk�aQrin))� (V/IGuhtLL CERTIFIED NO. 1 ��. - rG� r7 SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF IASURED NO. 2 �� / - - �� ti DATE DE�IVERE(O SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(only if requested) c66-18—O1fi9b-B pF0 POSEPARTMENT PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID OFFICIAL B NEG, PAYMENT OF POSTAGE.$sun uA ' toSI.TNt a OF ELIVERING OI CE ,o ONS: � Show name and address below and complete instructions on other side, where applicable. Moisten gummed ends, attach and hold firmly to back y of article. Print on front of article RETURN U TO RECEIPT REQUESTED. ENDS ' M C4 STREET NO 0.OR P.O. BOX r,� rs r° POST OFFICE,STATE,A"71lPrCOAE�.t,e" n n 7+ r.ice. /s{-1 r`7 6. r • April 12, 1967 Mr. Augustine Jo Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, ' Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. ,Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on April 6, 1967, it was VOTED To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on 'the following described plan '- 1, Applicant - Parker Brothers, - Bridge Street, Salem, Mass. 2. ' Location and Description - Land fronting on Bridge Street, bound- ed by St. Peter Street., Howard Street, and land of the Boston & Maine Railroad 3. Deed of .Property recorded in Essex South District Registry (Sheet attached showing Books & Pages) Very truly yours, MPscc er , HENRY HI%IN MEYER RACKEM.ANN, SAWYER & BREWSTER • ROGER D.TYLER / WILLIAM L.LAYSON ALDERT S.WOLRE COU N S E L L O R S AT L A W EDWARD N s E L RD ER AUGUST R..L VER RICHARD H.WOYEWL 53 STATE STREET WIRING P.JOROA N,JR. WILLIAM 9.TYLER DAVID G.COLT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109 AREA CODE 617 523-3550 WALTER G.VAN DORN GEORGETAS April 4, 1967 HOROT H EAAC.CAFF HENRYH L AYER GEORGGEE M.DALLAS IV Planning Board Town Hall Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Attention: Mrs . Callahan: Dear Mrs, Callahan: * Enclosed find a copy of a plan which we submit for the Planning Board's endorsement. The plan is being submitted for endorsement as not requiring approval under subdivision control law. We are seeking to register the land in a Land Court proceeding. As you will note in the letter from the Land Court Engineering Department to our office a * copy of which is enclosed, herewith, the Planning Board may endorse its approval on the copy of the plan which is submitted herewith. Although you mentioned on the phone to me that "approval" is normally stamped on a linen, the Land Court will be satisfied with. approval endorsed on the plan enclosed which they forwarded to us. Enclosed also is Form A, a copy of which has also been sent to the City Clerk of Salem along with a copy of the plan. Yours very truly, Brian S . Meyer BSM:pf Enclosures • ADDENDUM FOR FORM A - PARKER BROS., INC. The various deeds by which the applicant acquired title are set forth hereunder. All said deeds are recorded in the Essex South District Registry of Deeds. A complete report on the premises is contained in Land Court Abstract No. 27886 in pursuance of which registration approval is hereby being sought. Book 2439 Page 302 it 2621 It 381 • " 3044 " 526 3949 it 256 n 4292 It 257 " 2577 " 418 " 2694 327 4120 " 512 4275 " 302 " 4432 " 132 Petitioner. Parker (.,others Inc. CAB; NUMBER <� n 27886 I , �64f-4'ry 021OJ' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN ANSWERING CORRESPONDENCE ALWAYS REFER TO THE CARE NUMBER iI l 1 j February 150 1967 I Rackerman, Sawyer & Brewster, Attys 53 State Street 1; Boston, Massachusetts I' Dear Sirs: i The decree plan in the above numbered case, which is a copy of a plan by Rowland H. Barnes & Co. dated January 1957 and 1956 and showing land on Bridge and Howard Streets in Salem, has been returned to the Engineering Department to be brought up-to-date and for Planning Board endorsement. • Kindly have your surveyor certify that conditions on the ground are the same today as they were when surveyed or report any changes that may have taken place since the or- iginal survey to the Land Court. The above certification or any changes may be added to the enclosed print after which it should be endorsed by the Salem Planning Board and returned to the Land Court. Nothing further can. be done until this print is re- turned, after which the plan will be completed and sent to the Legal Department. Very truly yours, J. Walter Chilsom Deputy Engineer JWC/mh ac :. Rowland H. Barnes & Co. 681 Main Street Waltham, Mass. i (1Litg of "Salem, Aassar4usetts ��'� Iilxxtxi attr� Citu Pull Salem, �fllllassuchusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass-- -----------AP_ril--4----------------------19_67__ To 9 67-- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ------------ the--land-1-5--not_-beix>,g__diyide cl__into__two_--o r__more__lo_ts__nnd_therefor_e__ is__not_-within -the-_ defl-ni tion__of___subdi VIBiOn_pf_Chaptex___41j�A$1__L___-_ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant --------Parker-Brothers-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address ----------------BridgQ__Streeti-Salem - -- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor --------ROWlalld_HI.,__Barne-s---_____.................................................. Address -Main--Street,--Iolaltham,--Massachusetts-------------------_---------- 3. Deed of property records in ---ESsex_S-o th_District___________Registry Books ee__a_ttaehed Page---------------------- --------- 4. Location and Description of Property: The__.premis83_frD-n --soiltherly__oiLBrldge_____ Street---and,___in---the---main,___lie__betweem---St,-_Peter_Street---on _the_West._ the---Bo-stoSl__and__Maine---Railroad_an.__the_North,___and__Ho_war_d__Street__ond---- land_of__the Cita-of Salem_onthe-_East.____Said__premises_being__outlin-- in_y_el,lox--on-the--plan--awbmi tted__her_ewith.-------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner,k "9 1� a< tis Addres -F--- ----'s--- ------------'----per' a American Society for Public Administration p 1329 Eighteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Q Phone: (202) 667-7900 April 7, 1967 James E. Webb President Stephen K. Bailey President-Elect Don L. Bowen Ezeculive Director Council Stephen K. Bailey Dear City Official : Marver H. Bernstein Kenneth N. Bragg I 'm sure you realize that cooperative effort among public G. James Fleming agencies--federal, state, and local--has always been, but is now an Herman Goldstein increasingly vital part of governmental action in today's society. George A. Graham I have found a unique opportunity in working with the 'prime movers" Jerzy Hauplmann of other agencies by my membership and activity in the American Ferrel Heady Society for Public Administration. Berl W. Johnson Breene M. Kerr The benefits of a cit official 's Frederick H. Kerr recognized in a y participation in ASPA was Louis J. Kroeger g policy. statement adopted in October 1966 by the Louis Lowe International City Managers' Association Executive Board. The ICMA L. Miller, Jr. statement urged city managers and other key city officials to increase Phillip Monypenny their personal participation in ASPA activities and emphasized that a Keith F. Mulrooney major strength of the Society is found in its ability to bring together Henry L. Newman administrators from all levels of government and all program fields Joseph M. Ray to cooperate in solving problems common to all. Joseph M. Robertson Albert H. Rosenthal Please consider the enclosed carefully. If you are not already Con F. Shea among the many municipal officials who participate in ASPA, I urge you Harvey Sherman to join now. Many cities recognize the value of ASPA membership by Lloyd M. Short investing public funds in the membership dues of their employees in Samuel E, Vickers the Society. If you are already a member, will you James E. Webb y pass this word York Willbern along to your professional associates so they may have the opportunity to join with you in the activities and programs of the Society? Chairmen Ferrel Heady Graduate Education Council Sincerely yours, Bert W.Johnson National MembershipCoramittee Lloyd D. Musolf It University Bureaus Bert W. Johns/n Conference Joseph M. Ray Public Issues Committee Fred W. Riggs Can, anal" a Administration Group D Waldo r-inChief,Public ,inistration Review Edward W.Weidner International Committee .i act�.e American Fjorlety ['or Publk A[ImMistratioll 1966--1967 JANTEs E. WijiB, President STEPHEN K. BAILEY, President-Elect DON L BOWEN, Executive Director C 0 U N C t L STEPHEN K. BAILEY JAMES L. MILLER, JR. Dean, Maxwell Graduate School Associate Director for Resenrch Syracuse University Southern Regional F-Alucation Board MARVER H. BERNSTEIN PHl1J-1P MONYPENNY Dean, Woodrow Wilson School Professor of Political Science Princeton University University of Illinois KENNETH N, BRAGG KEITH F'. MULROONEY Consultant, Griffcnfiagen-Krocger, Inc Assistant Administrative Officer Beirut, Lebanon Ole of Pomona,California G. JAMES Fi-EMING HENRY L NmVNIAN Professor of Politiad Science Director,Southwest Region' Morgan State College Federal Aviation Agency HERMAN GOLDSfETIN' JoSuPH .WRA.Y Assistant Professpi:of Ciiinimil Justkc Administration President 4 Univiashv of Wisconsin Texas Western College GEORGE A. GRAHAM JOSEPH A ROBERTSON Director.Governmental Studies Assistant Secretary for Admiriistration The Brookings Institution U.S. Department of Agricrilunre JERZY HAUPTMANN ALBFRrI 1-1. RosFNIJUAL Chairman, Dcps;itnient of Political Science Professor of Public Administration Park College University of Mihnesota FI Rim, HEADY Co.N F. SHEA Director,Institute of Public Administration Controller University of Michigan State of Colorado Bi-,,it r W. JOHNSON HAhVFY SHERNIAN County Manager Director,Cirgumzrion slid.Procedures Depnitnient Arlington. Virginia Port of New York Aitil'torif BRrl-',NL M. KERR LLOYD M. SHORT Assistant Administrator for ['echnology Utilization Lewis M. Stcacns Nofess'll of Public Affains National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lincoln Uruvcushy FREDERICK Ii. KFRx SAryluEi,E. VICKERS- Public Seivice Director Director, Public Administi'aii0n Pi()JCt. City of Sioux City Ford Foundation. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Lows J. KROEcER JAMES E. Wmm VxeCtuiVe Vice President t Administrator (ijiffenhagen-Kroeger, lnc, National Aeronautics and Space Administradon SCHUYLER Lowp, YORK WILI BERN Director. Department of General Administration Director, Institute of Public Adjainisu,,,lion District of Colombia Government Indiana Ujuversiiv C1-1A I R M E N FERREi, HEADY, GraduaieEducatimi Council JOSEPH A RAY,Mili)tr. Issites Conunitice Director, institute of Public Administration President University of Michigan Texas Western College &Rr W. JOHNSON, National Membership Committee FRED W. Rices, (:onzpaiative Administration Croup Countv Manager Professor of GowriuriGnt Arlin- .ton, Virginia Indiana University U,Oyi)D. M LISOLr. University Bureaus Conference DWIGHT WALDO, Editor-in-Chief Director, Institute of Government,,] Affairs Public Administration Rei,iea, University of California at Davis Director,Institute of Governmental Studies UrniNcisity of California at Berkeley EDWARD W. WEIDNER, International COritiniffee Director, Center for Developmental Change University of Kentucky �2,.co�vrc,��fi oftt1em, �t�sttch�zsett5 • +riv^ r April 10, 1967 �nttn �f. ilbrau, �r_ _ Geralh '(L'_ Or(fartltq 34 Q,f{lnrrll ,street �luichaelashufnsci Ettilenc, r�iassn cl7asc}ts r�.lbert �" jaitcuff YXapmuah A. �Shleeneo Hone Kevin Be Harrington, State House, Boston, Massachusetts Dear Senator : At a meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board held on April 69 1967; it was voted to write you at this time to inform you of our approval of the following bills: House - - No. 4064: An act authorizing cluster development under the Subdivision Control Law Senate - No. 576: An act authorizing the employment of special coun- sel on city and town Planning Boards • House - - No. 3466: Resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to Zoning Laws House - - No. 236: An act providing for the creation and operation of metropolitan service corporations to provide and coordinate certain public services and func- tions for metropolitan areas . We hope that you as our legal representative will vote in favor if they appear before your body. Very truly yours, JMG :cc —/-�'" Chairman Ctv of '*Iem, 'Mttssarhuse##s Ivarb galla X91. Qkay, �c - NNN V ` April 11, 1967 &mlb ffi. �64arI49 pir4xrl Faskofaski 39 �llurcll e4freet ,Albert F. vitcoff �$a[em, �lassaclluseifs �agatsak �(. o$faettup New England Telephone, Massachusetts Electric Company, 24 Norman Street, 25 River Street, Salem, Maas. Beverly, Mass. Atten: Salem Engineer William L. Reuell, Dist. Supt. Dear Sir: I' We are enclosing copies of proposed amendments to the sub— division control regulations. We are forwarding them to you for your review, with particular reference to underground utilities. Very truly yours, JMG:c c ,_., ��) , x�//t< t Us . Z' aian% • STATE OF CALIFORNIA RONALD REAGAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :624 WEST 19th STREET, ROOM 4, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 -s® April 12, 1967 Salem Planning Board City of Salem Salem, Massachusetts 01971 Gentlemen: This department has recently been involved in a program relating to renewal of, an area of historical significance. As part of this program we are interested in obtaining information related to the preservation, restoration and enhancement of historic structures and areas. In connection with this effort we would appreciate any information in the form of pamphlets, brochures • or fact sheets that you could provide to us on the Historic Area Study, a report which your Board produced. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very _ truly yours, V'�N� g �. A446" Donald L. Graff U(� Area Representative DLG:Ij Tity of Salem Aassachnsrt#s ])fanning Puttrb • paha A. Q5rag, 3r. April 12, 1967 (Seralb T. �ffiIcGIar ft Michael Paskafnshi 34 QIhurch *frerf jk1hert iR. Pitcaff �falem, �l9Hassachusefls paumanb A. �$faeeneu Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, City Hall, Salem, Mass. Dear Mr. Mitchell : Re :-Salem Kcres, Inc. , - Witchcraft Heights. The developer of the above subdivision has requested the release of securities in the amount of $101000.00, covering completion of roads,d bounds, with respect to lots 24 to 51 inclusive, , 84-88 inclus- ive 112 and 113; and further, the release of 6000 comple- tion .00 for com 1 , , p e tion of roads, curbs and sidewalks bounding lots 79 to 83 inclusive, and 52 to 56 inclusive. Will you kindly advise if this work has been completed in a man- ner satisfactory to you, and if not, what your recommendations would be in order to release these securities. Very truly yours, RFS :cc Acting Chairman " • (Ei#g of Iem, ttsstttljuse##s ,r planning psarb jolln J0. (gray, Jr. April 18, 1967 (beralb S. jOldlarthg piehatl vaakataski 39 �hacch eAtreet ,€ lbert A. Fitruff �lalem, �Tassachllusetta a FallmottD _A6eetmp_ Mr, Morton Braun, Planning Services Group, 18 Idiot Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Braun: You are invited to attend a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem in the near future, to inform the members as to which programs the City of Salem should • enter into. The Board will meet this Thursday evening, April 20, at 34 Church Street, at 7:30 P.M. Meetings are held on the first and third Thursdays of each month. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman (lei#g of ISxlem, 'Massar4use##s Peparfineut of Fuhlic ?Mnrks NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY enamaex April 17,1967. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: Your letter dated April 12,1967 is substantially the same as your letter dated January 25,1967. My answer is, of course, the same as the first part of my letter dated January 27,1967. I also refer you to my list of "objections to acceptance", dated April 30, 1966_, and presented to your Board at the special meeting on May 2, 1966. Many of these "objections to acceptance" have not been taken • care of. I suggest that this matter be discussed with the City Solicitor before any further action is taken. Veryyj truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer • (9itV of �$Mlent, fflttssar4usE#ts • �; t p Prpartmnf of?Juhlir Parks NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENOIN[ER April 19,1967. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re : Witchcraft Heights Development Gentlemen: Yesterday, after a heavy thunder storm and while it was still raining, an inspection was made in the above referenced area. Water running in streams through "valleys" between houses and over the sidewalks was noted at the following locations: #18420 Gables Circle,-into sunken hole in sidewalk, large flow #16-#18 " it 5' wide stream across sidewalk #26-#28 " it moderate flow from rear yard #21423 Gallows Hill Rd. #19-#21 u " It • #17419 II of II #15417 " It " - large flow #13415 Most of this water comes from high rocky hills to the rear of these lots. Water level in holes previously dug in front yards on Gables Circle show water level at about 2" or 311 below yard surface. Water was also standing in many other yards that are very flat. It now appears that much subdrainage may be required at the above locations. It also is now evident that subdrainage WILL be required at the foot of the rocky hill in the proposed extension to the subdivision at the Ord Street end. I suggest that the Planning Board ascertain if any of this ground, or surface,water gets into any cellars. In my opinion, the above situatidn could be considered a "public nuisance"and if it is found that ground water does get into the cellar8, it is suggested that the Planning Board consider the need to rescind their approval of this subdivision,- for this and many other reasons. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer .. y (11ity IIf �em, ttsttcixse#ts ,r� Ittntfinuttr� �alln ,lAA. (�rttp, fix. (Beralb Z. �Ac(Qttrt(lg Airflael ?Paskafnski 34 (94urril Street ,Albert 1R. Witraff Salem, 'fassarhusetts �2agman t . "kbeeneg April 21, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on April 20, 1967 it was VOTED: To endorse "Approval of Definitive Plan" on the following described plan, "Subdivision Plan, Witchcraft Heights, Crescent Street, . Summit Street, Owner Salem Acres, Inc. , Scale 1"=401 , June 1, 1965, Revised October 1966, Carter & Towers Engineering Corp." 1. Applicant: Salem Acres, Inc. 202 Hancock Street Everett , Massachusetts 2. Location and Description: Land located on and off Ord Street , Witchcraft Road, Summit Street and Albion Street Extension. 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Books 5270 Pages 84 Books 5382 Pages 694 5270 80 5330 174 5270 82 156 35568 Very truly yours, SALEM PLANNING BOARD s ®LEGISLATIVE r° s FOR FURTHER AB U E L E T I N J.KINYION CALL o � _ J. KINNENEY O'AOURKE MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF CITIES & TOWNS AT (617) 742-3399 8 BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MASS. 02108 14/67 4/14/67 Dear Municipal Official : Over 500 local officials - - mostly from the housing and redevelopment fields -- gathered in Boston this past week for the Governor' s Confer- ence on Community Development. The League was a co-sponsor. The major topic of discussion was the proper role of the state in local community renewal and development programs . While the Commonwealth is a leader among the 50 states in terms of its financial contribution to these local efforts , many argue that the state should have a more mean- ingful role. However, before such a role can be exercised, the state ' s administrative structure must be streamlined. Dr. Paul Ylvisaker, who recently became New Jersey' s first Secretary of Community Affairs eloquently described that state ' s new Department and urged Massachusetts to create a similar agency. Legislation which would have created a Bureau of Community Affairs within the Department of Commerce and Development has been killed (See S. 818 on page 79 of • this Bulletin) . But the Department of Commerce and Development is now developing a new reorganization proposal which may be considered by the General Court. The difficulty with most reorganization schemes designed to give the state a more prominent role in the solution of local development prob- lems is the fact that the agency proposed is always placed in a sub- departmental position. Furthermore , planning responsibility is rele- gated to an even lower position in the structure. To be meaningful , the agency should be given a prominent position in its own right, and planning should be placed in a position where it will have some impact on other departments and agencies , such as Public Works and Welfare, which administer programs having major local impact. It appears doubtful that such an approach can be achieved. Other activities of interest include : the Committee on Taxation has killed many of the bills which would have eliminated or reduced the motor vehicle excise tax; and,. the Governor' s veto of H. 1010 , which would have extended the time for paying motor vehicle excise taxes , was sustained in the House . The League urged the Governor to veto the legislation and the House to sustain his veto . Finally, we have yet to hear from many of you regarding your plans to attend the annual awards dinner next Saturday, April 22 , at 6 : 00 p.m. on the Boston College campus . Senator Muskie will deliver a major Isaddress , and three municipal employees will be honored by the League. Won' t you mail your reservation form today? J. Kinney O' Rourke Executive Director Legislative Bulletin -76- 14/t7 == 4/14/67 LEAGUE BILLS H. 1694 for an act authorizing redevelopment authorities to en a e in • rehabilitation within urban renewal areas . For description see #2 67 , p. S. Reported favorably by Comm. on Mercantile Affairs . Passed House Apr. 3 and Senate Apr. 10 . H. 1695 for an act authorizing the Commonwealth to ovide financial assistance to cities ns ;Thic contra Ute un prs to redevelopment and housiag authorities for the purpose of making relocation payments . For description see #Z/67, p. 5 . Reported favorably in House and re- ferred to Comm. on Ways & Means . H. 3536 for an act permitting municipalities to make purchases through e state pure asing agent. For description see 3 7 , P. Reportee avoaTlyrin ou[1 se anireferred to Comm. on Ways $ Means . BILLS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL INTEREST BILLS VETOED: H. 1010 for an act allowing the payment of motor vehicle excise taxes y the taxpayer at the expiration of 90 ays . For description and pre- vious floor action see #13/67, p. 73. Governor' s veto sustained in House April 12 . BILLS ENACTED: • H. 164 for an act relative to assessor and deputy tax collector. For description and previous floor action see #13767 , P. 74 . Signed by Governor Apr. 10 as Chap. 123, Acts of 67 . H. 1347 for an act defining eligibility for. qualifying examinations under civil service. Would broaden tne Dasis ot e igi i i y to in- clude n- c u e emp oyees o a whole department in consideration for a position in one division of that department. Passed House March 15 and Senate March 27. Signed by Governor Apr. 5 as Chap. 112 , Acts of 67. H 1348 for an act clarifying eligibility in competitive promotional examinations . For description and previous floor action see #13/67 , p. 74. Signed by Governor Apr. 10 as Chap. 125, Acts of 67 . H. 2573 for an act concerning the preservation of absentee ballot applications and envelo es of ualified voters . For description and previous floor action see 2 67, p. 67. Signed by Governor Apr. 5 as Chap. 115, Acts of 67. H. 2630 for an act authorizing rou s of insurance companies to under- take nder-to e or acquire an carr on urban re evelo ment projects . Adequately Te-scribed by title. Signed by Governor Apr. 10 .as Chap. 127, Acts of 67. H. 3051 for an act extending the time any city or town may accept pro- visions of the retirement law relating to certain veterans . Would grant a year' s extension until Jan. 1 , 1968. Signed by Governor Apr. 10 as Chap. 128 , Acts of 67. Legislative Bulletin - 77- 14/67 - - 4/14/67 H. 3339 for an act excludin housin authorities from the o eration of • the law requirinlomain oors of certain apartment houses a designe or equippea to cse automatically. Adequately described by title . Signed by Governor Apr. 12 as Chap. 142, Acts of 67 . H. 3502 for an act repealing the law restricting the right to establish an oxanization of firemen. For description see #9/67, p. 43. For previous loor action see #13/67 , p . 73. Recalled in Senate and re- turned to Governor Apr. 4 . Signed by Governor Apr, t0 as Chap . 129 , Acts of 67 . H. 4430 for an act making appropriations ofr the fiscal year ending June 30 , 1967 to provide for supplementing certain existing appropria- tions and for certain new activities and projects _ For description and previous floor action see #13/67, p. 74. _ Signed by Governor Apr. 3, as Chap. 107 , Acts of 67. H. 4444 for an act providis wheng theat the director of civil service may hold ertain examinationnver public convenience requires Would permit the director to hold continuous examinations. Signed by Governor Apr. 5 as Chap. 110, Acts of 67 . H. 4453 for an act to exempt Vietnam beterans who are disabled or blind from excise tax on motor vehicles owned or registered by them. Adequately described by title . Signed by Governor Apr. 5 as Chap. 117 , Acts of 67. H. 4465 for an act to clarif the rovisions of the communit mental • healthan retar anon reorganization act. Woul make minor changes to the law and provide for continuity in operation between department of mental health before and after reorganization. Senate amended to exclude section relating to continuity of operations and passed Mar . 28 . House passed Mar. 29. Governor signed Apr. 10 as Chap . 132 , Acts of 67 H. 4493 for a resolve providing for an investigation and stud b a special commission for t e purpose of developing a uniform set of rules _ and regulations relative to t e operation of school buses throughout the Commonwealth. Adequately described by title . Signed by Governor Apr. 12 as C ap. 12 , Resolves of 67 . BILLS AWAITING GOVERNOR' S ACTION: H. 1446 for an act establishin the Old Colon PlanningCouncil . For description and previous floor action see #13/67, p. 74 . To Governor Apr. 4 . Recalled in Senate Apr. 10. H. 2545 for an act pertaining to registration of voters prior to s ecial town meetin s . For aescription and previous floor action see #13/67 , p. . 74. House concurred Mar. 29. House passed Apr. 3. H. 2935 for an act relative tothe compensation of police officers who atten certain courts in criminal cases . For description see #6/67 , p. 20. Passed House Mar. 28 and Senate Apr. 3. To Governor Apr. 6. • BILLS PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED: H. 1719 for an act clarifying the retirement law with regard to bene- fits payable to certain widows . For description see #8/67, p. 40. Legislative Bulletin - 78- 14/67 -- 4/14/67 For previous floor action see #12/67 , p. 64 . Amended in House to make the provisions applicable to widows receiving such pension on the • effective date of the act . Passed House filar. 28 and Senate Apr. 6. ORDERS ADOPTED: S . 937 for an order relative to an investigation and study by the Ee:j:1- .s—litiv­eResearch Council of traffic congestion in the larger cities and the feasi ility of constructing underground shopping complexes . Adequately described by title. Senate adopted Apr. 13. BILLS KILLED: S. 15 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to establishing minimum rates of speed for vehicles on certain highways . S. 68, S. 231 , S. 237 and H. 493 all to ascertain and carry out the will of the people regarding a constitutional convention.(Se20p . S. 82 for an act providing that damages recoverable for the takings ofJJ business properties by eminent domain shall include the loss of good will. (See p. 42) S. 91 for an act requiring that notices of the issuance of licenses or varience in zoning be given to certain public officials and others . • S. 155 for an act further extending the dates of termination of cer- tain acts relating to the rights and privileges of veterans . S . 186 for an act establishing a board of registration for professional community planners . (See p. 37) S. 195 for an act relating to the powers of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in constructing, extending, modifying, or improving mass transportation facilities . (See p. 20) S. 293 for an act giving certain powers to superintendents of public schools in cities of over 100, 000 population. (see p. 18) S. 367 for an act to promote safety in school zone areas . S. 514 for an act authorizing certain cities and towns to grant special licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages near schools and churches . S. 533 for an act clarifying the appeal provisions under the subdivi- sion control law. S. 576 for an act authorizing the employment of special counsel for the city and town planning boards . S. 639 for an act requiring gas and electric companies to notify local • boards of health and welfare before terminating gas or electric service because of non-payment of such service . (See p. 37) 4/14. - - 4/14/67 S 790 for an act cru:,tin an authorityfor the ur ose of providing • f' """-"� assistange for the construction acquisition , rehab- tation, and improvement of industrial and manufacturing Plants in the .,nth in order that new employment oppor- tunities will be created, providing for the powers and duties of the authority and for certain powers and duties of the Department of Commerce and Development related thereto, and making appropriations therefor. S _ slit for an act establishing a Bureau of Community Development with- in the Department of Commerce and Development . H. S3 for an act authorizing the department to dissolve a union, to assign or reassign a town to a union, or allow withdrawal . II. 54 for an act enabling towns in unions to become members of regional school districts . H. 180 for an act providing that candidates for municipal police officers be high school. graduates . H. 181 for an act bringing the veterans preference provisions of Mass . civil service law into conformity with the veterans preference Provisions of the federal civil service law. • H. 212. for an act requiring certain motor vehicles used for the trans- portation of school children to have signs with the words "school bus" attached on the front and rear. H. 284 for an act exempting certain works of art and sculpture from local taxation. H. 345 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special committee relative to redefining the duties and res- ponsibilities of the registry of motor vehicles and state police with respect to highways and public safety. H. 3S4 for an act allowing owners of certain residences taken by eminent domain to recover additional interest exenses necessi- tated by the purchase of a new home . (See p. 32� H. 431 for an act providing the removal of public officials who refuse to testify concerning their official conduct on the grounds of self-incrimination. H. 458 for an act exempting motor vehicles ten or more years old from the imposition of an excise tax. H. 466 for an act reducing the maximum rate of excise taxes on regis- tered motor vehicles and trailers . (See p. 16) H. 513 for an act establishing a fund for the payment of unsatisfied judgements obtained by children for injuries sustained as passengers in school buses . Legislative Bulletin - 80- 4/14 - - 4/14/67 if. 566 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study relative to the feasibility of establishing traffic courts in the • Commonwealth. H. 637 for an act providing for an increased allowance for earnings of a person pensioned or retired for a disability. H. 639 for an act requiring telephone companies to assign uniform telephone numbers to police and fire departments in all cities and towns . FI. 695 for an act repealing the excise on registered motor vehicles . H. 810 for an act further regulating the method of publishing notice of early land acquisition by redevelopment and housing auth- orities . H. 828 for an act providing for the coverage of certain officers and employees of the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions under the old age and survivors insurance program. H. 831 for an act relative to- the connection of sewer lines . H. 879 for an act defining certain property which is annexed or attached to real property as personal property. H. 909 for an act including within the definition of an approved • school project for the purpose of state aid for the school construction certain accommodations for the use of the central administrative officers and employees of a school system. H. 960 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to the advisability of establish- ing a five man commission for urban appeals consisting of two real estate brokers , two architects , and an attorney. H. 981 for an act affecting the pensions and retirement allowances of police officers and firefighters . H. 1013 for an act providing for a reduction in motor vehicle taxes . (See p. 16) H. 1076 for an act restricting the income from investments of funds by a city or town. H. .1097 for an act requiring verification of certain contracts with cities and towns prior to payment being made by a treasurer. H. 1143 for an act abolishing the excise tax charged the public on me meals . H. 1144 for an act relative to the payment of the excise upon charges for meals . (Also 1145 , 1147 and 1148 for similar acts . ) 0 H. 1249 for an act providing for a guaranteed minimum retirement allowance after 40 years of creditable service . � _ I Legislative Bulletin -81- 4/14 - -4/14/67 H. 1259 for an act relative to reporting defective elevators, escalat- ors , or dumbwaiters . H. 1264 for an act relative to the regulations made and promulgated by the board of fire prevention regulations . H. 1270 for an act relative to the installation, maintenance and re- pairing of certain apparatus and appliance of municipal elec- tric plants , and certain electric, gas-electric railways , electric railroad and railroad companies . H. 1307 for an act exempting school buses from the provisions of the automobile excise tax. H. 1311 for an act requiring open inspection of all contracts made by a town committee . H. 1341 for an act requiring the appointing authorities to permanently fill all vacancies in permanent positions before civil service lists established for such positions expire . H. 1342 for an act relative to the appointment of civil service employ- ees . H. 1363 for an act authorizing certain powers for superintendents of public schools in cities with over 100 , 000 population. • H. 1373 for an act requiring the Commonwealth to reimburse cities , towns and districts for one-half the expenses of maintaining approved vocational schools . H. 1381 for a resolve for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to the failure of the Commonwealth to make use of the full allocation of funds under the federal aid to education act. H. 1393 for an act relative to regulation of carriages and vehicles . H. 1406 for an act relative to the care and maintenance of public . highway bridges over railroads . H. 1495 for an act providing for the delegation of authority of boards of aldermen and selectmen over changes of ownership or joint use of transmission lines locations in certain cases. H. 1522 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to abolishing the granting of life tenure to any employee of the Commonwealth or political sub- divisions thereof, except judges . H. 1549 for an act providing that "municipal examiners" shall be • included in the definition of the term "public accountant" . H. 1560 for an act exempting military personnel serving in Viet Nam from motor vehicle excise taxes . r Legislative Bulletin - 82- 4/14 -- 4/14/67 H. 1575 for a bill relative to excise on certain farm machinery. H. 1628 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a • special commission relative to federal money available for youth programs , and the feasibility of establishing youth recreational centers . H. 1632 for an act relative to the distribution of money from highway fund for the repair and improvement of public ways in small towns . H. 1749 for an act relative to the form of real estate tax bills and notices . H. 1759 for an act relative to the election of town officers . H. 1787 for an act providing for the issuance of certificates of identification and requiring their presentation at the polls in certain cities . H. 1794 for an act prohibiting standees in school buses . H. 1909 for an act providing for the delegation of the authority of boards of aldermen and selectmen over changes in ownership or joint use of transmission lines locations in certain cities . H. 1943 for an act providing that certain records of authorities , • established by the General Court to serve a public purpose , shall be open to public inspection. H. 1972 for an act to improve the efficiency of county operations , to provide for central purchasing, and to encourage uniformity of practices and procedures where desirable . H. 2003 for an act requiring the registry of motor vehicles to assign a permanent registration plate to all fire department vehicles in every city and town. H. 2030 for an act providing for one trial for persons charged with violations of by-laws , orders , ordinances , rules , and regular tions and misdemeanors . H. 2054 for an act authorizing cities and towns to borrow money for establishing, purchasing, extending, or enlarging municipal gas and electric plants , and to issue revenue bonds in connec- tion therewith. H. 2073 for an act pertaining to the assignment of a site for refuse disposal . H. 2074 for an act providing that no works or system for disposal of refuse shall be established or constructed unless the plans or • designs therefor have been approved by the department of public health. LEGISLATIVE T — — — FOR FURTHER — — — BULLETIN INFORMATION CALL m � J. KINNEY OROURRE MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF, CITIES & TOWNS AT (817) 742.3399 "SEs R BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MASS: 2108 iS/67 4/21/67 Dear Municipal Official : Most of the activity at the Statehouse this week consisted of student tours , this being the Spring vacation period for most of the Common- wealth' s schools . In addition, Patriots Day gave legislators a mid- week holiday opportunity to mend fences in their districts . The best news of the week for municipal government is the get-tough- with-delinquent-taxpayers policy announced by the new Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation, Cleo F. Jailett. We talked with the Commis- sioner just after he made his announcement that almost 170 agents would go into the field starting May 8 in search of unpaid income , sales , meals , gasoline, cigarette and alcoholic beverage taxes . Initial reports quoted the Commissioner as saying that the initial phase of the drive , to last about five months , might bring the state an additional $1 or 2 million. Over a full year improved enforcement may produce another 18 million. We asked if he thought most of these funds would come from uncollected sales taxes . Noting that a taxpayer who is delinquent with regard to one tax is usually not paying the others , the Commissioner said the uncollected funds should come from all taxes . He also indicated that the Department would seek out the larger taxpayers first in the hope that the initial impact of the drive would help the state , cities and towns meet current needs for operating cash. Jailett said he recognized the difficulties cities and towns are ex- periencing without the Cherry Sheets . Most reports indicate that the state will be unable to produce them by the May deadline because of the lawsuit which has been filed to determine whether 1965 or 1966 val- uations will be used as the basis for distributing sales tax revenues . He said he and his staff are now working with the Depart . of Educ. in an effort to prepare some data which will be helpful to cities and towns in determining their tax rates . "We are working on the possibi- lity of sending out Cherry Sheets based on both sets of figures ," he said. "In addition, we are going to be as realistic and as judicious as possible in the use of estimates in an effort to prevent year-end shortages from occurring. " Finally, the Commissioner, who doesn' t want his program regarded as criticism of his predecessor, noted that many predictions about 1967 sales tax collections are faulty. Most taxpayers are now reporting on • a quarterly basis rather than monthly. Thus many returns for the early part of this year have not been reflected in the sales tax return fig- ures . It appears that we have a new breed of tax collector in the Commonwealth. His methods should help municipal government. J. Kinney O' Rourke, Executive Director Legislative Bulletin -84- 15/67 - - 4/21/67 BILLS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL INTEREST BILLS ENACTED: • S. 1092 for an act relative to the or anization of a re iona1 refuse disposal planning board and authorizing it to accept and expend feder- al funds without appropriation. Adequately described by title . Signed by Governor Apr. 10 as Chap. 40 , Acts of 67 . S. 1094 for an act to permit cities and towns to appropriate and borrow money outside the debt limit for municipal golf courses . Adequately described by title. Signed by Governor Apr. 20 as Chap. 160, Acts of 67 . H. 1482 for an act to make Viet Nam veterans eligible for benefits under the housing laws . Adequately described by title. Signed by Governor Apr. 18 as Chap. 121 , Acts of 67. H. 4480 for an act relative to the bases. upon which the limit of indebtedness in cities and towns is predicated. For description and previous floor action see #13/67, p. 74. Signed by Governor Apr. 10, as Chap. 133 , Acts of 67 . H. 4481 for an act requiring voting _addresses on absentee ballots . For description and previous floor action see #13/67 , p. 74. Signed by Governor Apr. 10 as Chap. 134 , Acts of 67. BILLS AWAITING ACTION BY GOVERNOR: S. 515 for an act further defining '_'housing board" and 'mayor" as used in ur an eve opment corporations . Would define "housing board" as the Department of Commerce and Development rather than the Division of Housing and include managers of Plan D or E cities in the term "mayor" . To Governor Apr. 18 . S. 1082 for an act providing additional compensation for city and town clerks who also serve as members of boards of registrars of voters . For description and previous floor action see #13/67 , p. 73. To Governor Apr. 12 . H. 1803 for an act relative to the reporting of motor vehicle acci- dents by police departments . Would require filing within 1S days of accident. To Governor Apr. 17 . BILLS PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED: S. 1108 for an act providing that receipt of the allowance payable to widows of certain employees retired for disability shall not preclude such widows from receiving an allowance based on their own services to the Commonwealth or a political subdivision thereof. Adequately described by title. Passed House Apr. -6 and Senate Apr. 18 . S. 1109 for an act providing that the question of accepting the law • establishing a 42 hour week for fire fighters in cities and towns may be _p laced upon the ballot at munic�al elections . Adequately descri- bed �y title.— Passed Senate Apr. 6 and House Apr. 18 . Legislative Bulletin -85- 15/67 - - 4/21/67 H. 3054 for a resolve directing the department of public utilities to make an investigation and study relative to the need of sur ace u • storage facilities in urban areas .7 Would direct study owa goal of requiring underground storage o petroleum and other bulk materials . Passed House Apr. 8 and Senate Apr. 13. OTHER FLOOR ACTION: H. 826 for an act providing retirement benefits for certain public school teachers not in the retirement s stem. Would provide pension of 0 for 20 years teaching plus 50 for each additional year. After third reading House referred to Ways f, Means Apr. 13. H. 910 for an act incl the state school construction grants for cities an towns in _epresse areas . Adequately�escri�title . Or ered to third reading in House Apr. 11. H. 1164 for an act relative to the tak_i.n of water for emergency pur- �oses amities an towns . Would al ow such uch takings y water supply districts , ig re and water districts, water companies , county or state institutions and cities and towns. Senate rejected Apr. 13. H. 1788 for an act changing the length of time of preservation of voting lists use at primaries. iVould keep lists for two years . Passed House Apr. 10. Senate ordered to third reading Apr. 13. H. 1846 for an act allowing cities , towns and districts to pay the • full cost of insurance provided by Chap. 32 B. Would increase share from one-half for contributory general or blanket insurance . House ordered to third reading Apr. 12. H. 2764 for an act requiring the posting of the name and address of non-resident owners or manaRers of dwellings housing three or more - families . orefame yes . Woul provide a fine up to S0 for non-compliance. ash secT—House Mar. 29. Senate ordered to third reading Apr. 3. H. 4523 for an act prohibiting the closing of a polling place at any state election prior to 8 n Adequately described by title. Passe ouse Apr. 5. Senate or ered to second reading Apr. 11 . H. 4536 for an act relative to the exemption of certain persons from taxation of certain real estate.For widows , minors and elderly, would provide flat exemption o $175 or $2000 in real estate value , which ever is greater, provided property value does not exceed $20,000. Passed House Apr. 6. Referred to Ways and Means at third reading in Senate Apr. 17. H. 4594 for an act clarifying the right of a police officer to arrest on fresh and continued pursuit. Would allow such pursuit in the case of a crime committed within the officer' s jurisdiction and in his presence . Passed House Apr. 12 and sent to Senate. • BILLS STILL IN COMMITTEE: S. 45 for an act providing that bulk oil terminals be located under- grouna-._ -YouTd- provide that-01-1 tei-ininals _or-mare rhaa—Iv;ovv gal Juns caparcity be located underground. To Ways $ Means Mar. 27 . Legislative Bulletin -86- 15/67 - - 4/21/67 S. 5.5 , for an act relative to the exemption from taxation of the official residences of the id strict executive of the Baptist General • Conference of .New En land. To Taxation. Would exempt the official residence of the district To of the Baptist General.. Conference of New England from taxation provided value is less than $15 , 000 . Heard Feb . 6. S . 59 for an act further regulatingthe tax exemption of property of . certain elderly persons . To Taxation. Would allow joint tenants , if over 70 , to earn up. to $6, 500 and still be• exempted from property taxes . Heard Feb. 7, 16 . S. 95 for an act requiring planning boards to hold public hearings within thirty days after proposing zoning ordinances or by-laws are file before the planning board.. Would require planning boards to hold public hearings within twenty days after proposed zoning ordin- ances or by-laws are filed before the board. To Ways & Means , Mar. 29 . S. 112 for an act to provide for the continued exemption of certain property of an elderly person after the death ot his spouse . 10 Taxation. Would continue such exemption provided that income does not exceed $5 , 000. Heard Feb . 7 , 1.6,.' S . 113 for an act exempting from taxation the real and personal. pro- pert of the incorporated instrumentalities of Kaleva Inc. and the Knig is and Ladies of Kaleva Inc. To Taxation. Adequately describ7ed by title . Heard Feb. b., • S . 118 for an act prohibiting banks from allocating periodic payments by mortgagors for taxes or purposes other than tax payments . 10 Banks and Banking . . Adequately described by title . Heard March 29 . S. 121 for an: act providing for county data P rocessin centers . To ounties . Adequately described y title . Hear Feb. 15 . S . 153 for an act permitting operation of coin-operated self-service ', laundries on Sunday. To Mercantile Affairs . Adequately described by title . Heard Jan. 31 . S 169 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to organization of the various police departments in the Commonwealth. To Public Safety. Adequately des- cribed by„ title. Heard Feb . 27 . S. 176 for a resolve providing for an investigation_ and study by a special commission relative to the correction and detention programs of the. several counties and of the City of Boston and relative to the gradual consolication' of the county jails and houses of correction. To Public 1Qelfare. Adequately described by title . Heard Feb . 14 . S . 180 for a resolve further reviving and continuing the special commission established to investigate and study the problems of water • pollution in the Commonwealth and the laws thereof relating to water pollution. To Rules : Adequately described by title . aring not yet scheduled. Legislative Bulletin -87- 15/67 - - 4/21/67 S. 188 for an act establishing the board of certification of health • o facers . To State Administration. Adequately described by title . Hear Mar. 6. S. 192 for an act exempting from taxation certain real and personal property of the lodges of the Loyal Order of Moose , and the Fraternal Order of Eagre-s-7-To Taxation. Adequately escribey title . Heard Feb. . S. 193 for an act relative to school supplies and materials . To Taxation. Would require students buying exempted school supplies to show a school identification card. Heard Mar. 21 . S. 200 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission of the taxation of railroads the granting of sub- sidies and the offering of incentives for the im rovement of assen er services o the railroads of Massac usetts . To Transportation. Adequately described by title . Heard Mar. . 2. S. 215 for an act providing for the pament of interest ori real estate tax payments paid by mortgagors to banking institutions . To Banks Banking. Would require advance payments made by the mortgagor to earn 2 1/2 % interest annually, to be paid quarterly. Heard Mar. 29 . S . 216 for an act authorizing banks and insurance companies to invest in the stocks of certain limited dividend corporations involved in • urban re evel_op_emtn projects . To Banks $ Banking. Adequately des- cribed by title . Heard Mar. 29 . S. 246 for an act authorizing counties to acquire land for conservation purposes . To Counties . Would permit counties to buy or to acquire by eminent domain land for conservation purposes . Heard Feb . 13 . S . 260 for an act providing for the app ointment of master teachers in the public schools . To Education. Would define master teacher as one who holds a teacher' s certificate, has completed a training pro- gram approved by the board, has a least three years teaching experience and recommendation of a school requesting a master teacher. Would also require the state to pay master teachers who serve as super- visors of student teachers $100 for each student teacher he super- vises . Heard May. 6. S. 261 for a resolve to establish a commission to investigate and study the ability of the Commonwealth to support capital develop- ment of public higher education in the decade ahead. To Education. Adequately described by title . Heard Jan. 31 . S. 274 for an act increasing the minimum amount of construction grants for certainapproved school projects in regional school projects . Would increase the mum grants for construction of regional school projects from 40% to 50% . To Ways $ Means Feb . 16. • S . 275 for an act increasing the minimum amount of construction grants_. for certain approved school projects in cities and towns and for county schools . Would increase the mum grants for construction of all approvei sschool projects to 50% , including approved schools now under construction. To Ways $ Means Jan. 31 . Legislative Bulletin -88- 15/67 - - 4/ 21/67 BILLS KILLED: H. 2106 for an act to provide for the establishment of the office of • economic opportunity to provide for the effective implementation of and assistance for the anti-poverty programs within the Commonwealth and for other purposes . H. 2168 for an act to provide for the reimbursement to cities and towns of certain expenses incurred for the transportation of pubils . H. 2173 for an act relative to the registration of voters . H. 2175 for an act to permit certain aged persons to vote by absent voting ballot. H. 2224 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special. commission relative to the establishment of a Massachusetts Industrial Development Commission. H. 2226 for an act providing that housing authorities and their employ- ees shall be subject to certain provisions of the state labor rela- tions law. H. 2274 for an act increasing the minimum annual sompensation for police officers in cities and towns . (See p. 20) . H. 2275 for an act increasing the minimum annual compensation for fire fighters in cities and towns . (See p. 42) . • H. 2314 for an act reducing the excise taxes on motor vehicles . (See p. 16) . H. 2316 for an act increasing the exemptions in taxes on meals . H. 2358 for an act requiring school committees to initiate school bus routes to prevent school children from crossing certain highways . H. 2377 for an act providing that standing passengers shall not be allowed on school buses . H. 2414 for an act repealing the provisions of law relative to housing authorities and urban redevelopment corporations . H. 2440 for an act to further define the appointment of veterans ' agents . H. 2441 for an act amending the provisions of law whereby cities and towns may sell or abandon excess property. H. 2486 for an act repealing the motor vehicle excise tax. (See p. 17) H. 2495 for an act providing an alternative method of enforcing liens _ • for certain real estate taxes . H. 2523 and 2524 for acts to provide for ward councilors in Plan A and E cities . LEGISLATIVE - ///2 FOR FURTHER ii, -�, I BULLETININFORMATION CALL � 1. HINNEY O'ROURNE MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF CITIES & TOWNS AT Isis 742-33998 BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MASS. 02108 16/67 /67y Dear Municipal Official : This week marked the death of most of the legislation which was filed late last year for consideration by this General Court . On Wednesday, the deadline for committee reports on all bills arrived. Many State- house observers , noting that major items of legislation were still in committee and that the deadline was extended last year, thought the final date for reports would be extended. Only the new Committee on Local Affairs , which was created for the purpose of considering special acts affected by the Home Rule Amendment to the Constitution, was given an extension of time . The flurry of activity at the Statehouse yesterday and today was fantastic - - almost everyone, it seemed, was asking the House or Senate Clerks what had happened to their bills . Given the number of bills affecting municipal government - - almost 1500 - - it is impossible to provide you with complete status reports this week. However , this bulletin does contain a list of bills which have definitely met their • demise. The procedural aspects of this situation are interesting . Under the rules of the General Court , those bills which the Committees do not act on before the deadline automatically receive an adverse report. This report does not automatically kill a bill ; all bills still reach the floor of either the House or the Senate , depending upon their origin. Favorable action on the floor is unlikely, because of the adverse report, but this report can be amended to permit passage of a bill . This possibility is all that may save some of the desirable legislation; such as the League ' s bills calling for state assumption of welfare, relief, and court costs and the Governor' s message calling for a study of the state' s fiscal needs . We are watching the daily calendars very closely in an effort to determine when floor action will take place on -these bills . Hopefully, they can be saved. The court ordered reapportionment of the General Court has lead to speculation that county boundaries will be redrawn. This possibility, of course, gives rise to further speculation that we are in for a very interesting fight over how county government will be drawn, quartered and then re-constructed. • The Constitutional provision requiring that each county have at least one representative leads to this situation, and the provision requir- ing the Commonwealth to have county government only adds to the conf>>ci_on. Legislative Bulletin - 90- 16/67 -1- 4/,28/67 Good results could come from re-drawing county lines , though. As presently drawn, the boundaries represent very little except an emotional commitment to the status quo . If they were drawn with a • community of interest and the efficient provision of regional govern- mental services in mind, counties might become viable partners in the Commonwealth' s governmental structure. Perhaps injection of life in county government by giving it responsi- bilities which are regional in character and by making it more responsive to the electorate is the only solution to the difficulties it now poses for cities and towns . The numerous bills filed this year which would have resulted in the abolition of county government are dead. Others , like the League ' s bill requiring state assumption of the costs of county government, have been dealt the same fate . Thus , a new approach to county government' s future may be in order. - - - - - - - - - - The report of the special civil .service study commission should be ready for filing with the General Court within two to three weeks , according to a statement made yesterday at the Boston Citizens ' Seminar by its chairman, Senator Samuel Harmon of Boston. The Senator carefully avoided giving even an inkling of what would be in the report. The other members of the panel , which included Lieutenant Governor Francis 1V. Sargent and Jean J . Coururier, Executive Director of the National Civil Service League, called for an end to preferen- tial treatment in public personnel systems . Sargent spoke out strongly against the Commonwealth' s absolute veterans ' preference • system and said the Volpe administration wanted to make civil service reform a bi-partisan effort. Couturier forcefully. stated that if we want to use public personnel systems to satisfy a social obligation, we should admit it. On the other hand, he said, if the personnel system is supposed to provide a framework for improving the. quality of public personnel , we must abandon all forms of preferential treatment , including veterans ' preference and residence requirements . On Wednesday the Senate adopted S . 282 a bill which would increase the state-wide minimum salary for teachers from $5 ,000 to $5, 750, by an overwhelming margin. However, when it considered the bill again yes- terday, the Senate adopted an amendment requiring the state to reim- burse the cities and towns for the cost of this increase - - an estimated $32 million per year. This legislation is undesirable because the matter of compensation for public employees, including teachers, can and should be solved locally, through the collective bargaining process , where the needs and capa- city of the community can be taken into account . The legislation should be defeated, even with the amendment requiring state reimbursement. Given the tight state budget , the funds for this proposed reimbursement can only come from the Local Aid Fund) leaving • the cities and towns footing the bill anyway. The Senate will vote on this bill again Monday. VOICE YOUR OPINION ON S. 282 TO YOUR SENATOR TODAY! J . Kinney O ' Rourke Executive Director Legislative 'Bulletin :gq- 16/67 - - 4/28/67 BILLS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL INTEREST • BILLS ENACTED: S. 515 for an act further defining "housing board" and "ma or" as used in urban development corporations . or description an previous floor actios , p. 64 . signe by Governor April 25 as Chap . 121A, Acts of 67. S. 518 for an act enabling district planning commissions to borrow in n tcipa ion of revenuesfrom member municiga stiieess . Adequately des- � y ifs—Signe y Governor April 'mart of Chap . 40 B, Acts of 67. S . 1108 for an act providing that receipt of the allowance payable to wtdow o certain employees retire or is ability shall not preclude SUCH widows from receiving an allowance based upon their own services o the ommonwea or--politica su ivision thereof. For description and previous floor action see , p . 84 Signed by Governor April 25 as part of Chap. 176 Acts of 67. S . 1109 for an act providing that the question of accepting the law establishing a 42 hour week for fire fighters in cities and towns may be placed on the ballot at municipal elections . For description and previous floor action see #15/67. Signed by Governor April 25 as part of Chap. 177 , Acts of 67. • H. 1803 for an act relative to the reporting of motor vehicle accident by police departments . For description and previous floor action see #15/67 , p. 84. Signed by Governor April 25 as part of Chap. 163 , Acts of 67. ORDER ADOPTED: S. 601 for a resolution urging the public welfare department to in- crease budgetary items in certain old age assistance cases in order _ to meet the increased costs of living and to coincide with the in- creased payments under the Social Security Act. Adopted in Senate April 13 and in House April 18 . BILLS PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED: H 654 for an act prohibiting members of county ormunicipal commis- sions or boards from being appointed or elected to certain other positions . For description see #8/67 , p. 37 . Passed House April 5 and Senate April 17. H 1788 for an act changing the length of time for preservation of voting lists used at primaries . For description and previous floor action see #15/67, p. 85. Passed House April 10 and Senate April 17. • H 4505 for an act providing for the naming of a beneficiary by a municipal employee so that a city or town treasurer may pay to such beneficiary such sums as may be due the munici al em to ee at the time of his death. Adequately described by title . Passed House March 28 and Senate April 17. Legislative Bulletin -92- 16/67 - - 4/28/67 H. 4523 for an act prohibiting the closing Tif polling laces at• any • state election prior to 8 p. m. For Description an previous floor action see#_ 7 , p. 85 . Passed House April 5 and Senate April 24 . BILLS KILLED: S. 39 and S. 40 for acts directing the department of public welfare to increase the budgetary allowances for rent and food for recipients of old age assistance . S . 72 for an act authorizing the board of education to make school construction grants for remodeling, reconstruction, or making extra- ordinary repairs to school buildings . S. 82 for an act providing . that damages recoverable for takings of business properties by 'eminent domain shall include loss of good will . S. 195 for an act relating to the powers of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in constructing, extending , modifying or improving of mass transportation facilities . S. 196 for an actmaking certain school transportation allowances to cities and towns included in .the Mass . Bay Transportation Authority payable to the META. S. 602 for an act providing that each recipient of old age assistance .who has enrolled for medical insurance under "Medicare" be given an • additional three dollars a month for the payment of the monthly premium. S. 699 for an act providing for the removal of public officials who refuse to testify concerning their official conduct on the grounds of self- incrimination. H. 198 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study of the availability and use of federal funds for Title V programs administer- ed by the Children' s Bureau of the Welfare Administration, U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. H. 329 and H. 2166 for acts prohibiting the payment of state aid to cities , towns , and regional school districts for maintenance of voca- tional schools unless certain educable mentally retarded pupils are eligible for admission to said schools . H. 332 for an act to appoint supervisors of special classes for men- tally retarded children in all cities and towns of at least fifty thousand inhabitants . H. 350 for an act relative to the taking of real property for purposes other than mass transportation. H. 352 for an act relative to the duties and powers of clerks of the • municipal and district courts . H. 567 for an act to establish the Commonwealth Bureau of Investigation Legislative Bulletin _oz_ 16/67 -- 4/28/67 • H. 905 for an act authorizing a school committee to enter into agree- ments with the school committee of another city or town to perform jointly or for such other city or town certain educational programs . H. 1014 for an act relative to municipal certificates of liens . H. 1044 for an act providing reimbursement for transportation of handicapped children to special schools . H. 1145 nad H. 1147 for act relative to regulation of the excise tax on meals served to the public. H. 1148 for an act providing that meals costing less than $1 . 50 be exempt from the meals tax. H. 1190 for an act providing for local control over school budgets . H. 1211 for an act to redefine the term "special municipal employee" under the conflict of interest law. H. 1367 for an act to insure that each city and town shall receive from the Commonwealth school aid not less than 115% of the amount received in the calendar year 1965. H. 1432 for an act relative to the apraisal required for the taking • of real estate and interests therein by eminent domain. H. 1490 for an act relative to the retirement deductions of public employees . H. 1615 for an act relating to the employment of certain teachers under contract by school committees of other municipalities . H. 1647 for an act amending the law regulating the activities of state, county, and municipal employees and establishing a code of ethics for them. H. 1651 for an act to establish a 24 hour court of limited criminal jurisdiction in the municipal court of Boston, the central district court of Worcester and the district court of Springfield. H. 1692 for an act providing for the inclusion of air conditioning in the provisions applicable to housing for elderly persons of low income. H. 1836 for an act exempting trucks owned by a city or town from the law requiring trucks carrying sand and gravel to be covered. H. 1850 and H. 2390 for an act restricting the exercise of the power of eminent domain by cities and towns . H. 1940 for an act limiting the number of members of the advisory board of the Department of Public Welfare who may be directors of local welfare departments or local welfare districts . Legislative Bulletin -94 16/67 - - 4/28/67 H. 1948 for an act authorizing the Registry of Motor Vehicles to sus- • pend registrations of trailers for non-payment of excise tax. 'H. 1958 for an act making certain changes in the law relative to the suspension of registration certificates for non-payment of excise tax. H. 1979 for an act providing for the employment of certain retired teachers and school principals as substitute teachers or in another constructive educational capacity. H. 1980 for an act to increase permitted compensation for certain substitute teachers . H. 2319 for an act making payment of the motor vehicle excise tax a condition precedent to the registration of a vehicle. H. 2540 for an act providing for the purchase of voting machines by municipalities . H. 2571 for an act making further provision for the appointment of election officers in towns . H. 2580 for an act to provide counsel for local election officials . H. 2583 for an act providing for the time of making up the list of persons over 20 years of age in cities and towns . H. 2590 for an act regulating the color of all motor vehicles for hire • used in the transportation of school children. H. 2592 for an act empowering the Registry of Motor Vehicles officials to impound or remove license plates of motor vehicles whose equipment is defective . H. 2620 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission relative to membership and voting privileges of regional planning organizations in the Commonwealth. H. 2627 for an act increasing the Commonwealth' s guarantee and annual contributions to housing of elderly persons programs . H. 2628 for an act further defining the term "low-rent" as used in the housing authority law, and authorizing housing authorities to acquire by purchase or lease the use of certain completed dwelling units for occupancy by families of low income . H. 2713 and H. 2714 for acts to ascertain and carry out the will of the people relative to the calling and holding of a constitutional convention. H. 2780 for an act redefining "maximum age" under the contributory retirement system. . H. 2823 for an act authorizing cities and towns to refund auto excise tax to certain persons . (f itV of $alt 1t, �RaMtI1tS8#tS t. Office of t4c 0tg ( irrh 19 �uguskiue 7�.�Snumeg QIilg Qlerk Foam.1 nub 3 TOR lull April 28, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray Jr., Chairman Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts - Dear Sir: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chambers on Thursday, April 27, 1967 the Mayor's reappointment of Raymond F. Sweeney as a Member of the Planning Board for a term of five years, expiring on • May 1, 1972 was confirmed by a unanimous roll call vote. Very truly yours AJT/hc AUTIRE CITY May. 2, 1967 Mr. -Augustine J. Toomey:, City Clerk City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on April 20, 1967, it was VOTED - To endorse• "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on'the following described plan - l. Applicant —Alice L. Buckley, 19 Beach Avenue, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description - Lots #16,#170 #18 Beach Avenue, approximately 1009 x ,751 , 7540 sq, ft of land, combined into one lot. 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 5098 Page 513 Very truly ,yours, MP:cc er J RECEIVED • 9���CLNINE Are 11 I e2 PNV rrm t II a CITY 1.1,t14'k"S OFFICE.=..'' SALEM, MASS, CHH pall �alem, �fnssuehixseifs FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. // Salem, Mass.,—t -----------------------19-1tli7 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- _____------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. (� • 1. Name of Applicant -- /!EKE/ { kilt �� - - ---- ----------------------------- ------------ Address -------- --- ----- ---- -- ` - 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor --------------- Address --------------- d, -- — — — — — Q''k — — —o`[ = ---------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property recordssin _- hYS---- t _______________Registry Book f Page._,S72�3------------ p 4. Location and Description of Property: ---- --- --- ---- -— -_L---- --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------- -� /d-------- 1 --------%q ----- -_ ---------- 14 4 Z- Gamma- l -------- X — 7,C- 74 - - � --------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Signature of Owner 016'd_--- /�----- ---------- - -------------- L, ----__---- Address __ _..___ _ C !// / - - , NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY 24 NORMAN STREET JOHN D. AHERN SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE DISTRICT ENGINEER AREA CODE 617 745-9906 May 1, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board City of Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: I have received copies of your proposed amendments to the subdivi- sion control regulations, and appreciate your thoughtfulness. We have reviewed the changes as they would effect the New England • Telephone and Telegraph Company, and request a meeting, at your conven- ience, to discuss with you item G on page 7 under "Fire Alarm Police and Civil Defense Overhead and Underground Cable Work." qoa�L . District Engineer-Salem JDA/chb LEGISLATIVE FOR FURTHER BULLETIN J. KINNEYO' CALL 1. KINNEY O'flOUAKE MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF CITIES & TOWNS AT (617) 742-3399 8 BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MASS. 02108 17/675/5/67 Dear Municipal Official : This week the House of Representatives voted permanency for the sales tax, adopted a resolution calling for a joint legislative constitu- tional convention, and, after the Senate had approved the bila. , initially adopted a bill increasing the teachers ' minimum salary. The minimum salary bill, which would raise the minimum from $5000 per year to $5750 per year, should cause all municipal officials a great deal of concern. The League has communicated with all members of the House twice, but only you can insure defeat of this legislation. Most of the municipalities in the state now pay teachers salaries which are almost equal to the new, proposed minimum, and, in some cities and towns , the teachers receive more than the proposed $5750. If this legislation is enacted, local teacher groups will press for increases -- through collective bargaining - - in amounts equal to the $750 increase in the minimum. Thus all cities and towns , whether • they now pay more than the proposed minimum or not, will be confronted by demands for additional increases , with this legislation used as the justification. AGAIN - - YOUR ONE PHONE CALL TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MONDAY IS THE ONLY EFFECTIVE METHOD OF PREVENTING ENACTMENT OF THIS BILL. The House adopted and sent to the Senate the bill proposed by the Governor to make the sales tax permanent. Only minor amendments were adopted -- one extending the exemption for clothing to sales of yard goods - - despite the fact that the floor debate was as long and heated as many of the legislative arguments which preceded enactment of the tax last year. In calling for the joint constitutional convention, the House listed the following items of interest to municipal officials for considera- tion: 1 . Authorization for a graduated income tax, 2 . Abolition of county government, 3. Abolition of the Executive Council, 4. Establishing a unicameral legislature, and 5 . Reduction in .the size of the House by one-third. The Committee on Constitutional Law is expected to file its own order . for a convention soon and, in the process , call for consideration of several additional items. J. Kinney O'Rourke Executive Director Legislative Bulletin -96- 17/67-- 5/5/67 BILLS. FILED BY LEAGUE • H. 1694 for an act authorizing redevelopment authorities to engage in re abilitation within urban renewal areas . For description see #2/67, p. 5, and for last progress see #14/67, p. 76. After passing Senate Apr. 10, referred to Senate Counsel who is expected to recommend changes . Conference committee action expected. . H. 1696 for an act establishinga commission to coordinate state responsibilities in the field of eliminating substandard housing and giving cities and towns certain responsibilities with respect thereto. For description see #Z/67 , p. 5. Reported favorably by Comm. on Mer- cantile Affairs . Given first reading in House and referred to Comm. on Ways and Means Apr. 25. H. 1697 for an act establishing a low income residential rehabilitation loanua. r. antee program. For description see , p. S . Reporte �orably by Comm. on Mercantile Affairs. Given first reading in House and referred to Comm. on Ways and Means Apr. 25. H. 1698 for an act authorizin the Commonwealth to rovide financial assistance to cities and towns for t e purpose of emolis ing unsa e structures and carrying out code enforcement programs . Reported favorably by Comm. on Mercantile Affairs . Given first reading in House and referred to Comm. on Ways and Means Apr. 25. For descrip- tion see #2/67, p. 6. • H. 3475 for an actrovidin that the Commonwealth shall reimburse the cities an towns or 1000 of their expenditures for veterans enefits . For description see #3/67, p. 9. Also H. 3568 for an act requiring the Commonwealth to undertake operation and maintenance of all 'ails and houses of correction. For description see #3/67 , p. 10. Both bills reported y Comm. on Ways and Means as a part of H. 4695 for an order relative to expanding the scope of a study by the Comm. on Ways and Means of the finances of the Commonwealth on May 1 . H. 4695 referred to Comm.. on Rules, acting concurrently. BILLS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL INTEREST BILLS ENACTED: S. 1079 for w resolve providing for an investigation and study by the group insurance commission re a ive to authorizing a deduction trom e pensions ot retired school eac ers for the payment ot certain insurance premiums. Adequately described by title. bigned by Governor Apr. 25 as Chap. 18 , Resolves of 67 . S. 1080 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by the retirement law commission relative to esta5lishing aro ram of retire- ment counselling for members o the state employees retirement system. • Adequately described by title. Signed by Governor Apr. Z4 as Chap. 16 , Resolves of 67. I Legislative Bulletin -97- 17/67 - - 5/5/67 • H. 1050 for an act requiring male and female votinglists to be con- soli ate A3equate y described y title, Signed by uovernor Apr. 3 as Crap-103, Acts of 67. H. 1788 for an act chaLiijjg the length of time for the preservation of use at voting lists primaries . For description see #15/b7 , p. 85. For previous floor action see #16/67, p. 91 . Signed by Governor May 1 as Chap. 191 , Acts of 67. H. 4493 for a resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission for the purpose of developing a uni orm set of rules and regulations relative to the operation of school buses in the Commonwealth. Adequately described by title . Signed by Governor Apr. 12 as Chap . 12 , Resolves of 67. H. 4501 for a resolve continuing the investigation and study by the Department of Public Health, the Department of Commerce and Develop- ment , the Metropolitan District Commission, and the Central Massachu- setts Regional Planning District relative to t e collection anddis- posal of sewage_ in certain municipalities in the county of Worcester and increasing the membership thereof. St�area inclu es fifteen towns and the City ot Worcester. Signed by Governor Apr. 12 as Chap . 13, Resolves of 67. ORDERS ADOPTED: • S. 933 for an order relative to an investigation and study by the Legislative Research Council of the implications of restricting the zoningOwers of cities and count _government and certain related matters . A equately escri e by title.. Adopted pr. . S. 937 for an order relative to an investigation and study by the om- lp exec . Adequately described by title. Adopted Apr. 10. H. 4351 for an order relative to the appointment of a nt special committee to make an investi ation of air �ollut�ion of the atmosphere and environment ot any part ot the Commonwealth from any source . Adequately described by title . Original order amended Mar. 8 to increase membership of the committee . BILLS AWAITING ACTION BY GOVERNOR: S. 55 for an act relative to the exemption from taxation of the official residences of district executives of the Baptist General Conferences of New nglan l^doul—cTal�ow exemption up to5, 000 value . Senate amended Apr. 17 to increase amount to $20 , 000. House amended Apr. 26 to make effective date Jan. 1967 rather than 1966. Senate concurred. To Governor May 3. SS. 1074 for an act further defining the duties of treasurers of cities and towns . For description see #12/67 , p. 66. Passed Senate Apr. 25 and House Apr. 27. To Governor May 4. Legislative Bulletin -98- 17/67 -- 5/5/67 S. 1128 for a resolve providing for an investigation by the Judicial • Council relative to certain arrests by police officers the examination by experts of records su poenaed� ar�an I'u�r� I _r. ding t at communications of certain patients be privileged and other matters relative to the disposition of criminal cases . Adequately d scribed 67— by title. Passed Senate Apr. 20 and House Apr. 25 . To Governor May 3. H. 1446 for an act establishing the Old Colony Okanning Council . For description and last progress see #13716-7, _p_. 74 . To Governor May 2. H. 2570 for an act relative to registration- sessions in towns. Would delete the requirement to old special voer registration sessions in precincts prior to annual town meeting. Passed House Apr. 18 and Senate Apr. 26. To Governor May 2 . H. 2582 for an act relative to the appointment of absentee registration officers. Wou1 elee t--Fe�angua— ge which allows selectmen to appoint such oo€fi ers . Passed House Apr. 18 and Senate Apr. 24 . To Governor May 4 . H. 4406 for an act relative to the investment of domestic insurance companies in urban redevelopment projects . Adequatel escri ed by title . Passed House Apr. 20 and Senate Apr. 26. To Governor May 4. H. 4463 for an act providing that no rule regulating the height or weight of persons eilgiuIe to become mem5ers of a police epar men srian be mace or en orced—excep yya city council or Board ot select- men. e ect-men. -Fordescription anil lastprogress see 913167 , p. e recall , returned to Governor May 3 . H. 4523 for an act prohibiting the closing of poliing places at an state election rior to 8 : 00 . m. For-description see #15 67, p. 85. For last progress see #16/b7 , p. 92 . To Governor May 2 . H. 4570 for an act clarifying the procedures to be followed_inmodifying amending or rescindin a roval of definitive plans under the sub- ivision control law. Would require, in recording such plans , that the p anning oar state that such change would not affect any lot in such subdivision conveyed subsequent to approval of the plan. Passed House Apr. 13 and Senate Apr. 25 . To Governor May 2 . H. 4608 for an act providing for the approval of town warrants during a period wen a vacancy exists on tTie board of selectmen. A e�ly described by title. Passed House Apr. 18 and Senate Apr. 27. To Governor May 3. RECALLED FROM GOVERNOR: S. 1018 for an act providing _for the payment of compensation for certain services ren ere to t e ComFdNe_alt oh r ran ON tical sub- ivision certain former ublic employees .Would remove the . clu- sion which prohibits retired legislators from working for the Common- wealth or political subdivisions . Passed Senate Feb. 20 and House Feb. 27. To Governor Mar. 1 . Recalled in Senate Mar. 7 . Legislative Bulletin -99- 17/67 -- 5/5/67 • H. 654 for an act rohibitin members of count or municipal commis- sions or oar s from bein appointed or e ecte to certain of er positions . For description see #8/67, p. 38. For last progress see #16/67 , p. 91 . To Governor Apr. 25. Recalled in Senate May 1 . H. 2935 for an act relative to compensation of police officers who attend certain courts as witnesses in criminal cases . For description see #6/67, p. 20. For previous floor action see #14/67 , p. 77. Twice recalled and returned by Senate. Governor returned bill , recommending changes to make law apply only to officers waiving the witness fee and subject to local acceptance Apr. 20. H. 3054 for a resolve directin thed_epartmen�t of ublic utilities to make an investigation and study re a1 tive to the need of surface bulk stora e facilities in urban areas . For description and previous floor action see 15 67, p. 85. To Governor Apr. 25. Recalled in Senate May 1 . BILLS PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED: S. 1157 for an act re uirin owners of certain dwellin houses to post t eir names an a dresses or the name an a resset their agents , if any, on such dwellinghouses . Would apply to multiple dwellings and provide a fine up to $50. Passed Senate May 1 and House May 4 . • H. 2371 for an act to include common within the definition of park. Adequately described by title . Passed House Apr. 27 and Senate May 4 . H. 4505 for an actrovifor the naming of a beneficiary by a municipal-employe e sNn o t at a city or town treasurer may pay to such beneficiary such sums as may have been due the municipal employee at the time of his death. Adequately described by title . Passed House Mar. 28 an Senate Apr. 14 . H. 4571 for an act providing for certification of applicants for eddlar° s licenses by the police chief of the municipality in which the app scant resides .. Adequately escribee title. Passed House Apr. 13. and Senate Apr. 25. House inserted emergency preamble ; Senate deleted preamble. Matter still unresolved. H. 4594 for an act clarif in the ri ht of a police officer to arrest on res an continue ursuit. For description and previous floor action see 015/b7 , p. 85. Passed Senate ivlay 3 and House Apr. 12 . OTHER FLOOR ACTION: S. 837 for an act relative to the determination of school rate taxes . For description see #5/67 , p. 17 . 8assei Senate May 1 . S. 1087 for an act to allow unassembled civil service examinations for 10certain positions . Would allow such examinations whenever exceptional eclucational qualifications of a scientific or professional character are established by statute for a position. Passed Senate Apr. 25 . In House Comm. on Bills in 3rd Reading since Apr. 27. Legislative Bulletin -100- 17/67 - - 5/5/67 S. 1130 for a resolve increasing the scope of the special commission • established to make an investigation a study of the causes and possible prevention of the current wave of violence and crime in the Commonwealt . Adequately described by title. P ssed Senate Apr. 20. In house Rules since Apr. 24 . S. 1141 for a resolve ,roviding for an investi ation and stud b the retirement law commission relative to employment the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions of certain retired or pensione employees_. Adequately described by title. Passed S� Apr. 25 . In House Ways and Means since Apr. 26. H. 116 for an act to clarify the provisions for proof of existence of a public way. For description see #13/67, p. 70 . Passed House May 1 . Ruin Senate May 4 . H. 665 for an act restricting the amount of information the board of p_lq!� a_tio�n _may make accessible to ertain departments of the federal , state and local governments an to certain educational an charitable MP A equately described y title . Passe House Apr. 18. 2nd Reading in Senate Apr. 26. H. 910 for an act increasing the state school construction Rrants for cities and towns in depressed areas . For description and previous Flo—or action see #1-5[-67 , P­_. _95.Passed House Apr. 17 . 1st reading in Senate Apr. 18. In Ways & Means since that date. H. 2577 for an act concerning the final date for qualification for • an a sentee ballot by voters who are not registered. Would remove the time limit requirement for are personnel to qualify to vote by absentee ballot. . Passed House Apr. 18 . 2nd Reading in Senate Apr. 26. Amended to reword title of bill and referred to Comm. on Bills in 3rd Reading on May 1 . H. 2801 for an act further regulating vacations for certain members of regular police or fire forces . For description see #9/67 , p. 43. For previous oor action see X12/67 , p. 65. Reconsidered and recom- mitted Apr. 20. Passed House Apr. 27. 2nd Reading in Senate May 3 . H. 3274 for an act limiting collectiveebbarrgaining between the school committee an representatives of teachers ' organizations to matters relating to wages . Amended in the House to expand negotiable items to include sick leave, sabbatical leave, insurance benefits and criter- ia for promotion. Passed House May 3. H. 4454 for an act providing that a local Rovernment unit may pay one- half the cost of a premium and the full amount of an additional rate for roup_ e�alt insurance for the widow an c i ren of a ire ignter who was killed or died from injuries received in t e per ormance of his duty. Adequately described by title . Passed House Apr. 17 . In Senate Comm. on 3rd Reading since Apr. 20. H. 4606 for an act authorizing the Department of Public Works and the • IL istrar of Motor Vehicles , acting jointly, to revoke a city or town spee regulation. A equately described by title . Passed House Apr. 13 n ate -Ways -VMeans since Apr. 17 . 4 �Ii oftt1em, � FSSSc�tItLtBEt#s • � -� �I�znnin$ �nz�r� k�.�.c1mT oa May 8, 1967 Ao4n A_ (Srae, Ocralb 1'. P4arft 34 Mhrrrrh 4itreet rUl9ichael3nshnfnski Eoalcm, 4Eacsarllnsctts ,klbert �i- Elitrnff �fagnunD .�. �fueene� . To the Honorable City Council, Louis A. Swiniuch, President and all Councillors : Gentlemen : For the past twelve to eighteen months, the Planning Board together with the heads of other City departments including Building, Electrical, Engineering, and Public Works, etc . , have been preparing recommendations for proposed amendments for certain City Ordinances listed under Chapter hap- 3 (Advertising ) ® Chapter 4 (Building Code, Chapter 8 (Electricity ) , ter 14 (Licenses ) , Chapter 28 (Streets and Sidewalks ) , and Chapter 35 (Zoning ) , which must be approved by the City Council. In addition, the Planning Board has also been preparing proposed amendments for the Subdivision Rules and Regulations, the said amendments • will not have to be approved by the Council as they are governed by the provisions of Section 81-Q of Chapter 41 of the General Laws. Actually most of these proposals are for clarification purposes to existing ordinances t i.e. , spelling out what the various sections mean. In one case, (Signsl , conflicting or ambiguous ordinances which are now listed under Chapters 3 , 4, 89 14, 28, and 35, are repealed and are rein- stated under Chapter 4, the Building Code. As at first glance these proposals seem complicated, I would like an opportunity to brief the Council before the Planning Board holds its Pub- lic Hearings, and before formally submitting its recommendations to the Council. I would therefore request two things - th cil and elf l. Thateld which Inundersttandswillbefore be on Thursday, May 11. 2. That the Planning Board be given permission to use the Council Chamber to hold Public Hearings . on Zoning and Subdivision Reg- ulations on the evening of Wednesday, May 31. f 1 1 f Under separate cover, I will forward you rough drafts of the proposals which are now being printed. Very truly yours, ell JMG:cc hair ar/, alem anning�o d J • • rlo [o�0 eyer[v DiCCcr eop) Gc- jo CrrukC1 (-( d2 ', , . �a_u c/G �/Z� flv� a °' � — ✓, �<u!<'� u K %inti n'CC CvdaLap, s ,y /-CGR T/iC, ,OA5--1- - TwECUE, To E/ Cu � EGa lhoNTHC-r rke ✓ C .6N/� iILC �BAPD� i o GOd'ry✓G/Z r4, r- HLAg),5 OrP (-R r5. DEf4 rmCu r- r c p1A.1G erletCAG 4AAO / ecic Zkf� t rc / 1"0 C 43f-'tN RZctpx(c'/ rcc:on,/�, el✓v.�eT., ° 1,� . F °2 X020 ? o SCo A/hE40l++C/✓ rs fog, Cta?iAlAr �! �jvovc2 r!2/NG ) 4. r/?U1GO1Atc coo o c, 8! �,tCrcCrlZIC / TyJ /�4✓ (CICE!✓CEr> _ ZE3� ( �r2CErf Awn 1.D EGJi( GK3S � �GIJ!/.G G/1IIClr MCttr 13G J ;FO u E a y y _ T li CC / T 7 � o(i A., %v , , Qvolr,, uli y'uc /Lfib KAS I Ac1s0 fECld � �C �.r/2llde r+ �U ��cSEn Am �uoMLwr� �-e- - oQ ruC 5uQOtuIs1O " ZvLrc,S 414 D 12ECvC4rlow �� TlrL SA / D Q/yiLNo7iGNrS W1GG Nor 14 ,(w k-, Tu ?f .4ApRvvE.o $Y ritc coU/rC /C tiAr TkC.y. ARE GodE /tNko FlY rdG j� izouis/ �1df 61= Cia 41pr e-e 4/ 01- T.v 4L U G �E IZlt C �CruAGy MUtr o� rlvr—rE pyzybs-4<4- TQC coK C(- 4iOl1cecf ,-1caN 1pu21Pwl- CY TQ F-xirr"1146 _:OdZ101N.vNCGot! _ /, 2y S cGG' Gi/Iour - WPAr' r& c- P ' � -VAetouf Sr-crloNV rryCAN, /A� o/! E c4 -re. �, lG11) • , CTk'!�l.vi1lreEf WN[ Co �tlZf. /Yo 4.y C. ICrEo Vic- U/VF04ce Ct4/lpr£Ps' 4l 81 14, 4wZ8 anon .J'S /JRE JZE.� GkGEd /Jd✓D � /l rF'.E /Z_EI.V tTAT,ED i �SAr, rl!G Ir t !Z f r G(-A /J C C, /Ta f_S"f:,- jPIZ 1"4 LS sC�rn Col yy4 �ir-Ep > ! Grocco - G�11'G� Ata n �� � toi v ��+ci v �a�- i 1FRIGF 7',l/� c' Uucs(- e4lroCC Y� 7-11Cl� (-,f11.4,aaC HO 'Y2D j:;Hocor trt /vee. tc - /V €„eCS' .0%o B4V6Ct, _ 2rn .ae e}. Su Feriae , rtwc tTs 62� CemTi� Cerb� _ 7� e7✓ T Ta T/+ C ( ocv as cle— OR r Q 0 L5-r- T w o 7-A(l tv 0(1 11 / �a✓Ar i! coli fLelrZre � $� N�< ® avt-rte_ _. TSG C.. dvA, et-c- - Tt/E Coo d, c+C r ; BE jtoe� ^ +VCk- r ;Z'(- 4 M4CCr-114 C, Wu1C� u6toE� s�AWo tvrC�G ¢3G et+ et1� LS r,4 16 f,. INOLt4r ,6-a0CRI-17tSS[ UN To uSG �/rA(C- C oUa CtC j C /JAh /�/G � 7 TG t/�ocD �V8C1C NG�lZI&Cr oW 4toa c� c30 ,,L) t Vtob �F4C�[ TtoH f 104 rke- evC4 + wc C,F 4ACnaCt0 ,tj n �oa 4,?.p �oU 2v u G (d De-4frt OF TAeC e) s14 QAI C" glee. 8c Yl r a r o Y - i - -� _ _ _ : � I _.. . F _ _ _ _ i _ - _ ;, . j - - - � ��� ` � l _ i i _ - -t - �_ 'j . i - - -7 �' ��� � l , I ,� _.. II GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 07970 RES.. SS PLEASANT STREET TELEPHONE 744-2172 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1153 May 4, 1967 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Salem Acres , Inc. "Witchcraft Heights" Gentlemen: I regret that I am unable to attend this Board' s meeting this evening in order to once again request that it release to my client certain saving books presently held by the Board as security for performance of certain work under the Protective Covenants between my client and the Planning Board. I refer you to my letter of January 23, 1967 wherein it was stated that Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Books Nos . 88227 and 88226 in the sums of $16,000.00 as security for completion of roads, curbs and sidewalks bounding Lots 24 to 56 inclusive, 79 to 88 inclusive , 112 and 113 were presently being held and that this work had been totally completed. I have discussed this matter at length with Chairman, John Gray, and he has asked me, in view of the fact that he shall be unable to attend tonight ' s meeting, to express his approval of my client ' s request . His approval is based on the fact that my client will replace this security with security in the same amount for the release of other lots in the development which your Board has already approved. It is hoped that the Planning Board will act favorably on my client' s. request in this matter. Very truly urs, GE RGE P. VALLIS, Attorney for Salem Acres , Inc. GPV/ijp Planning Pnttrd 3a4u ,ffl. Brag, 3r. May .9, 1967 (Beralb Z. �Ir(9nrthg Airllnrl Pnskafnski 34 CIhurrh �gtreet ,Albert P. Vitraff �nlem, f'Inssarhusetts gngmaub A. 'fRneeneg RECEIVED OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS TO BE HELD BY THE CITY TREASURER FOR SAFEKEEPING: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Account #300455, In Account with Salem Acres, Inc., in the amount of $16,000.00 One Withdrawal slip, dated May 5, 1967, payable to the City of Salem by the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, and charged to account #300455, Signed by Ugo DiBiase George P. Vallis, Witness Legal Document "Vote", signed Ugo DiBiase, Clerk Legal Document "Security Agreement", dated May 5, 1967, signed by Elio DiBiase, Treasurer for Salem Acres, Inc., Raymond F. Sweeney, Acting Chairman of Salem Planning Board, and George P. Vallis, Notary Public. Signed • r f1Tc#g Of *Irm, MSSFTCI�IISP##S • e;,, a Planning Peart 304A �A. Ckag, Jr. May 9, 1967 &ralb C. AcQlartltg - 34 Qlhurcli o*trect �fflicllael vasku(uski ,Albert Xt. ritesff �altm, �lassachusefte agmsnb . Atogeneg RECEIVED OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS TO BE HELD BY THE CITY TREASURER FOR SAFEKEEPING: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Account #300455, In Account with Salem Acres, Inc., in the amount of $16,000.00 One Withdrawal slip, dated May 59 1967, payable to the City of Salem by the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, and charged to account #3004559 Signed by Ugo DiBiase George P. Vallis, Witness Legal Document "Vote", signed Ugo DiBiase, Clerk Legal Document "Security Agreement", dated May' 5, 19679 signed by Elio DiBiase, Treasurer for Salem Acres, Inc., Raymond F. Sweeney, Acting Chairman of Salem Planning Board, and George P. Vallis, Notary Public. Signed( • Ti#g of *alem, 'Massarhuse##s • `��w.� �Ittxfrfin� �nttr� . P. amv, Mr. May 9, 1967 Zeralb T. ACCU 4V Michael Faskafa°ki 34 C4urch �*treet ,Albert P. Vitcaff �$Rlem, Massachusetts agaeanD . �*tseeneg RECEIVED OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS TO BE HELD BY THE CITY TREASURER FOR SAFEKEEPING: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Account #300455, In Account with Salem Acres, Inc. , in the amount of $16,000.00 One Withdrawal slip, dated May 5, 1967, payable to the City of Salem by the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, and charged to account #300455, Signed by Ugo DiBiase George P. Vallis, Witness Legal Document "Vote", signed Ugo DiBiase, Clerk • Legal Document "Security Agreement", dated May 59 1967, signed by Elio DiBiase, Treasurer for Salem Acres, Inc. , Raymond F. Sweeney, Acting Chairman of Salem Planning Board, and George P. Vallis, Notary Public. Signed • SECURI-TYAGREEMENT Essex, ss. May 5 , 1967 WHEREAS the undersigned, SALEM ACRES, INC. , the developer • of the land shown on a plan entitled, "Witchcraft Heights" dated January 29 , 1965 and recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds , Plan Book 104, Plan 55 , has petitioned for release of certain lots referred to in a Protective Covenant dated May 18 , 1965 and recorded in said Registry, Book 5277, Page 269 and desires to convey certain of the lots to others and WHEREAS certain work which is required of the developer by the City of Salem Planning Board in the construction of ways in accordance with said Protective Covenant and WHEREAS the undersigned, SALEM ACRES, INC. , has posted with • the Raid Planning Board certain security in the amount of Sixteen Thousand Dollars ( $16 ,000.00) for the said completion of the work herein required. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the release by the Planning Board of Lots hereinafter referred to, the undersigned, SALEM ACRES, INC. , stands obligated to the City of Salem in the sum of Sixteen Thousand Dollars ( $16 ,000.00) as security for the performance of the work herein described. In the event the said work or any portion thereof is not completed, the City of Salem shall have full and complete authority to use the sum of Sixteen Thousand Dollars ( $16 ,000.00) or any portion thereof necessary to complete said work. IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the said SALEM ACRES, INC. has caused its corporate seal to be hereto affixed and these presents to _2_ be signed, acknowledged and delivered in its name and behalf by • Elio DiBiase, its Treasurer , hereto duly authorized the day and year first above mentioned. SALEM ACRES, INC. By / s L �- ELIO Di-BIASE, TREAS ER RELEASE The Planning Board of the City of Salem does hereby release in full , Lots 1 , 2 , 3 , 9 to 23 inclusive and 89 to 97 inclusive • as shown on plan recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds , Plan Book 104, Plan 55 , from the force and effect of the conditions set forth in said Protective Covenant dated May 18 , 1965 and recorded in said Registry , Book 5277 , Page 269 . 1 i 7 i Acting CHAIRMAN COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Essex, ss . May 5 , 1967 Then personally appeared the above-named, Raymond F. Sweeney and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be the free act and d deed of the Citv of Salem Planning Board,, be ore e ? C k NCTARY PUBLIC G . RGE P. 1%JAL4.IS ,t Commission Ewpires: December 14, 196.8---- __-- -- VOTE At a meeting of the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Salem Acres , Inc. , duly called and held on • in Salem, Massachusetts , notice having been duly given and all the Stockholders and Directors being present and voting upon motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously VOTED: That Salem Acres , Inc. enter into a Security Agreement with the Planning Board of the City of Salem for the purpose of posting with the Planning Board certain security in the amount of ----Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($16 ,000.00)-------in consideration of a Release by the said Planning Board of Lots 1, 2, 3, 9 to 23 inclusive and 87 to 97 inclusive as shown on plan recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds , Plan Book 104, Plan 55 from the force and effect of the conditions set forth in a Protective Covenant dated May 18, 1965 and recorded • in said Registry of Deeds, Book 5277, Page 269. It was further VOTED: That the said corporation deposit with the said Planning Board the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Book Account No.2 ° O S5 as security for the performance of work described in the Security Agreement together with a withdrawal order made payable to the City of Salem, and VOTED: That Elio DiBiase , Treasurer be and hereby is authorized and empowered for and in behalf of Salem Acres, Inc. to sign, seal , acknowledge and deliver the said Security Agreement and any and all instruments necessary to perfect said security interest. • A True Copy. Attest : 0 t CLC i May lo, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a. meetingtof the City Planning Board held on May 4, 1967, it was VOTED - To .endorse "Approval under the Subdivision . Control Law e Not Required" on the following described plan - 1. Applicant - Henry G. Boucher, 11 Fairfield Street, Salem, (Represented by Counsel George P Vallis) 2. Location and Description - Land and buildings shown on plan as Lots 1, 2A and 3OA9 Champlain Road and Arthur Street each having sufficient frontage on a public way 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 4558 page 369 4483 198 Very truly yours, MP:cc er A a � 39T, e (9itU of �$ttlem, fflMSSarIJUSettSRECEIVED � � � dttnmzt� nttr� MAY q 2 49 PN I$? CITY Cl,EWs pFFICg SALEM. MASS, 34 (94urch firrri FORMA 6afew, pssnchusciks APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ----------------------------May--- z----------19.67 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ----_--_ _-_--See__attached__sheet_.__________________ ---------------- -- - ---------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant -------------Henry_G.__ Boucher--------------------------------------------------------------------- Address -_ll__Fairfield___Street_,___Salem�__Massachusetts___________________________ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor --------------Osborn_ Palmer,-_Inc.______-___ -------------------------------------- Address --------15-_Wal lis----Street ,- Peabody, Massachusetts ----------------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in pis-Iri-ct---------------Registry Book ----4-5'-58--------- Page ----369 4483 198 4. Location and Description of Property: -------Land---ar_i-d--build-ings---sklowA__4zL_-__---_-------------- -----------At1'Ac4q_dplan _as__Lots__112Aand30A Champlain_ Road_and____ -------Ar thu r__S t re e t_ -- ------------------------ HENRY BOUMRB Signature of Owner -y______ ___ ____ _ --YYv--�-�---------- His ttorney George P. Vallis • Address 70__Washing ton__Street_,___Sal-em_______________________ i • Every lot which has been divided has frontage on public ways . The entire tract was originally owned by the petitioner. On October 1, 1965 the petitioner conveyed Lot 2A to Emil G. Lemieux et ux by deed recorded in Book 5306 , Page 703. The petitioner is in the process of conveying Lot 30A shown on the plan to a prospective buyer and the purpose of the plan is to draw exact descriptions on the deed and mortgage as well as to establish fixed boundary lines . The property is located in an R2 zone and each lot contains the required minimum frontage of 40 feet . I F� May lo, 1967 Mr,. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on May 49 1967, it was VOTED - To endorse"Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan - • 19 Applicant - Charles M. Zolotas, 18 Union St., Peabody, (Represented by Counsel John Laskaris) 2. Location and Description - #2-4-6-5 School Street shown as Lots "A" and "B", each having sufficient frontage on a public way 3. • Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District. Registry Book 5440 Inst. #113 Very truly yours., MP:cc Clerk mi# uttlem, ttssttc �zse##s RECEWEIT • � � Mar 34 AM 's? Planning Puttrb CITY CLEI4.:S OFFICE SALEM. MASS. Titg Pall *Ulm, Massachusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ---------Mai'---3j--------–-------------------19-67_ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) _-_______ Property is on a public way and has sufficient ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- frontage ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------- ---------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • Charles M. Zolotas 1. Name of Applicant – -- -- – --- ---- ----- - ------ -- -- – 18 Union Street, Peabody, Mass. Address ------------------------------ ----------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Carter_&_Towers_Engngering_ Corp............................. Address -------------------------6--- airsiew__Avent1-.--_S__vlampscjatt,---Maas---*---------------- 3. Deed of property records in -------Soath_Z_ssex-Registry______Registry Book---S-LI 9 0----------- Page 4. Location and Description of Property: ____St WOOL_School---Street_-#s___2m4-6r8------------- -------Applicant-owes-Lot B. & A. and each of said lots has -- ----------------------------- -----------------------------------------a----------------------------- sufficient frontage on School Street. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C4,4 L Signature of Owner ____ _� -- -------- Address ________-___________ - ----------18 Union Street, Peabody, Mass. -------------------------------------------------- • r May 10, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, i `. Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the .City Planning Board held on May 4, .19679 it was VOTED - To endorse 11Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described°plan - l. Applicant - Raymond L. Cummings, Trustee of the Loring Realty.Trust,. 70 Washington Street, Salem 2. Location and Description - Three lots of land on Sumner Road shown as Lots A, B. and C. to show 15 ft to be conveyed to adjoining landowner 3. Deed of Property recorded in Sssex South District Registry Book 3613 Page 512 Very truly yours, MP•cc ler 1 BOORUM & PEASE " oMr- R" J L h 6tv of ttlezrc, I ssttcl��zse##s �'��� �Irxntliz� �uttr� city Pull *lem, Aussasllusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ---------May__2-z.........— ----------------19--67- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -______ Clause- �C)----- � �t 1�r �� 4-�`Z�- � Q� �•` rrLA<6e . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -- -------------- ------------------------------- - — ----------- - and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ------Raymond-L----Cum9Aing-s,--Trustee--4i_the__L_orin9--- ealty__1rust Address --------------- _Q__Washington--StYeQtr_Salem,_-Mass.--------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor------Bobert---B.--Bo_wmam-------------------------__---------------------------_------- Address _r/o_Oshorn__PalmerrInc-- _15__Wallis__3trEetr__PQahndy_,_�Iass_--____- 3. Deed of property records in ------Essex-South-District---------------Registry Book---3613,------------ Page----- 12_----------- -- 4. Location and Description of Property: Three_-j_a)___cex_tain__lots---9f__land-_4n_thg__south- westerly___side__of_Sumner__Road__shown__as _lots__A,_B__and_C_on a__ )lan-_entitled ----- --- - Plan_of__hnd__isl__Salem__Froperty__of__Lorinq__Ftealty__Trust}_April_ Qsborxz__P_almeriSxlo_fi_-1S__Wa3 �is__St;eet_,-._Peabody_'!�_said__1of s__being__a__subdi_yis- ion__of__plan_dated__January_ 1949_by__Osborn__Palmer,C_E_}__recorded with said deeds, Plan Book 77, Page 59. n Signature of Owner" � �� -- -� Trust e - Address ---7a-Nashing-ton--Stree-t,---Sa-LemMAss_----_-------___ `} LEGISLATIVE FOR FURTHER U L L E T I N INFORMATION CALL N 1. KINNEY O'ROURKE o MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF-CITIES & TOWNS AT (sty 742-3399 8 BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MASS. 02108. 18/67 5/12/67 Dear Municipal Official : S. 282 , which would increase the yearly minimum salary for teachers from $5000 to $5750, is now before Governor Volpe. The House of Representatives passed the bill by a substantial margin - - only 73 members voted against it . Some municipal officials have written to the Governor urging him to veto the bill, and the League has filed a similar request with his office. But, if your city or town has not advised the Governor of its opposition, that action should be taken immediately via telegram. The fact that your municipality may now pay more than $5750 to startini teachers should not allow you to acquiesce to this measure. If the bill is enacted, teacher groups will come before your school committee and argue that this legislation means all cities and towns should in- crease their salary schedules by $750 across the board. If every city and town were to do this , the cost of such action on a statewide basis • would run in the neighborhood of $30 million. In addition, this legislation is contrary to the collective bargaining law which the legislature passed in 1965 . The group which has pressed for passage of this legislation represents many local teacher groups at the collective bargaining table, and it wants this legislation to serve as the basis of stronger demands for higher salaries . Also, the bill is contrary to the concept that collective bargaining allows employers and employees to determine wages , salaries and fringe bene- fits in light of prevailing economic conditions , including competition for personnel among jurisdictions . It places an artificial floor undpr all discussion of economic issues , thereby preventing a meaningful exchange between employer and employee. But the Governor will not veto S. 282 unless he believes he has sub- stantial support from local officials . 11ire or call the Governor as soon as you read this bulletin. In other action, the General Court, sitting in a.. joint constitu- tional convention, took the first step toward giving the people an opportunity to vote again on a graduated income tax. The proposed amendment must be passed again by the next General Court, which commences in January of 1969. Thus the proposal cannot be on the ballot before 1970. • J.. Kinney O ' Rourke Executive Director Legislative Bulletin -102- 18/67 c'- 5/,12/67 BILLS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL INTEREST BILLS ENACTED: • S. 55 for an act relative to the exemption from taxation of the offi- cial residences o t e istrict executives of the Baptist General Conferences of New England. Fordescription and last progress see 17 67, p. 97. Signed by Governor May 3 as Chap. 212 , Acts of 67. S. 1074 for an act further defining the duties of treasurers of cities and towns. For description see #127, p. 66. For last progress see #17 67,-p. Signed by Governor May 10, as Chap. 255, Acts of 67 . S. 1128 for a resolve providing for an investigation by the Judicial . Council relative to certain arrests ty police officers ,the examination —experts of recor s suboenaed by agrand jury, providing that com- munications of certain patients be privileged information and other matters relative to the dis osition of criminal cases. For descrip- tion an last progress see #17/67 , p. 98. Signed by -Governor May 5 as Chap. 33, Resolves of 67. H. 2570 for an act relative to registration sessions in towns. For Description and last progress see #17/677-,—p7-987. Signe�c ty—GGovernor May 5 as Chap. 238 , Acts of 67. H. 2582 for an act relative to the appointment of absentee registra- tion o icers. For description _and last-progress see #17/67, p. 98 . • Sign-- ec�y Governor Hay 5 as Chap. 239, Acts of 67 . H. 4406 for an act relative to the investment of domestic insurance companies in urban reuevelopment�rojects . For nescription anTlast progress see #17/67 , p. 98. Signed -by Governor May 5 as Chap. 254 , Acts of 67. H. 4463 for an act providing that no rule regulating the height or weight of persons eliki`�le to become meinbers of a police lcepartment shall be made or enforced except b a city council or a board of selectmen. For description see 13 67, p`.--7-3 .-- For last progress see WT7T67 , p. 98 . Signed by Governor May 5 as Chap. 246, Acts of 67. H. 4523 for an act prohibiti R the closing of polling places at any I--- state election prior to 8 : 00 p. in. For description see #15 67 , p. 85 . For last progress see /6-7, p. 92 , and #17/67 , p. 98 . Signed by Governor May 5 as Chap. 247, Acts of 67 . H. 4570 for an act clarif�ing,ithe proceedures to be followed in modify- or ing, amen ing, or rescinding approval of de£initive__Rlans under the subdivision carol law. For description and last progress see #17-767 , p. 98. Signed by Governor May 5 as Chap . 248 , Acts of 67. H. 4608 for an actrovidin for the a roval of town warrant durin a period when a vacancy exists on the board of selectmen. For escrip- • tion and last progress see #17/67 , p. 98. Signed by Governor i-iay 5 as Chap. 249, Acts of 67. Legislative Bulletin -103- 18/67 -- 5/12/67 BILLS AWAITING ACTION BY GOVERNOR: . S. 282 for anact proviuing for a higher minimum salary for public school teachers . For description and last progress see #17/67—, f-he cover letter. Passed Senate Apr. 27, passed House May 4. To Governor May 10. S. 1157 for an act requiriI owners of certain dwellings to post their names and addresses or" the name and a-ddress of their a ents if any, on suchdwellings . For escri tion see IT17 g p T67,p�9 . asse Senate May 1 , Passed House May 4. To Governor May 9. H. 116 for an act to clarify the provisions for proof of existence of a public way. For description see #15/67 , p. 70 . For last progress see #17/67, p. 100. Passed Senate May 8 . To Governor May 11 . H. 2371 for an act to include "common" within the definition of park. For description and last progress see N17%67 , p. 99 To Governor May 9. K. 2801 for an act further re +g_ulatin� vacations for certain members of regular po ice an fire orces . For description see I9 For last progress see #17/67 , p. 100 . To Governor May 10. H. 4505 for an act providing for the naminj& of a beneficiary by _a_ municipal employee so that the city or town treasurer may pay to such 'Feneficiary such sums as m�have been due tNi munici a� 1 employee at the time of his—cems.—For description an last progress see • p. 99. To Governor May 9 . H. 4594 for an act clarifying the ri?ht of a olice officer to arrest on res and continued pursuit. For description see1 8 -- For last progress see #17/67 , p. 99 . To Governor flay 9. BILLS PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED: H. 1191 for an actdinexteng the duration of the board of schoolhouse structural standards . :Mould extend the life of the board until 1973 . Passed House P-Iay 1 , and Senate May 11 . H. 2259 for an act concerning the approval of places for the deposit of the residue from munici�al refuse disposal incinerators . Would make the places of deposit of the residue of municipal incinerators exempt from the laws governing the area on which the incinerators are located. Passed House Feb . 15 and Senate May 11 . H. 2725 for an act relative to the sus ension of teachers and sLperin- ten ents o sc ools. !'Joul`�ovide- o suspension o teachers for not more than three ays . Title was changed in the Senate May 11 because bill did not apply to the suspension of superintendents . Passed House May 3 and Senate May 11 . OTHER FLOOR ACTION: • S. 455 for an actro�viding for the non-criminal disposition of viola- tions o aws , yb laws and ordinances prohibiting litteringA equate- ly described by title. Passed Senate Apr. 20, in House Comm. on Bills in 3rd Reading since Apr. 24. Legislative Bulletin -104- 18/67 -7-,5/12/67 S . 837 for an act relative to the determination of school tax rates . For description see #5/67, p. 17. For last progress see #17/67. P. 99 . • Ordered to a third reading in house May 11 . H. 2091 for an act providing that certain fire chiefs who are on duty on certain holida s shall be grant- ed-an additional iaFor ascription see , p. 42 . Passecd House i4f_, ind sent to Senate. H. 3274 for an act limiting collective bargaininjrbetween the school committees an�re resentatives o teac rs organizations to matters --— relating to wages . For escriptionnd_alast progress se—e #T_7T6T,_ p. 100. Read a second time in the Senate and then recommitted to Comm. on Labor and Industry 14ay 9 . H. 4611 for an act providing for objections and _�,pReal to the state allot law commission on the initiative petitions in cities . Adequately descri e by ti�e.Passed—House Apr. 17 , in Senate Comm. on 3rd Reading since Apr. 20 . H. 4612 for a resolve _Rrovidin for an investigation by the 1p anning ivision of Department of oma►erce an _ment_ relative to the ning an _ planies an__ _towns .—_�_i ew aDevelou�_raT oT.26i� f . Adequately dzoning—_citescribed by title . Passedhouse Apr. 17 , in Senate Ways and Means since Apr. 18 . H. 4642 for an act rovidin g an exertion from real property taxes to - e fo- the amount of 2000 or 175 of actual taxes aue for certain i-d sa3lee • arsons. -1`Tew�ra-fit of 393, H. 281 , �I_._5 2 37 .—a�Ii - 6. ou apply. to persons who have lost the use of two limbs , who hold less than $25 ,000 in real property. Passed "House Apr. 27, in Senate had 2nd reading May 4 , and went to Sen. Ways and Means . H. 4643 for an act increasing-the amount of real�roper� of blind T arsons to be exam ted from taxation and establishing a flat exemption OT a certain sum of money du�e�To�r� taxes of blind Parsons.New draft 0 22 4. 691, H.1576, H. 21111 ' and H. 386d. l'louldexempt $3000 in real property or $262. 50 in actual taxes for blind persons provided that all property owned by the person does not exceed $25, 000. Passed House Apr. 27 , In Senate Nays and Means since May 4 . H. 4713 for an act further regulating tkt_iublicat_ion of notices relative to proposed -laws. Would require that any changes in the town by-laws be printed in newspapers in general circulation in the town. Passed House May 8, ordered to 2nd reading in Senate May 10. H. 4716 for an act authorizing the mailing of summonses_ for Harking violation com laints . Adequately described by title. Passed House May 8 , ordered to n- reading in Senate May 10 . H. 4778 for a resolve for an investigation and study by the Board of Education relative to state reimoursem_e_nt to_c_%ties and towns or T TTS ex enses incurred or maintaining certain_ extende�couroes o instruc- tion an certain related matters . 14ould also study the possibility o • reim ursing cities and towns one-half of the tuition paid by them for sending students to vocational schools in 'other cities and towns . Passed House May 11 and sent to the Senate .. Legislat*ive Bulletin -105- 18/67 - - 5/12/67 BILLS KILLED: The legislature has killed over forty bills which would have exempted many items from the sales tax. Space limitations prohibit the listing of all bills by number and title. The following are representative of the items which would have been exempted: school supplies , all printed matter, all medicines, sales by religious , charitible , and fraternal organizations , flags , gravestones , and commonly used house- hold items . Two other bills would have exempted certain disabled persons and all persons over the age of sixty-five. S. 220 for an act authorizing creation in cities of a population over 150, 000 of a demonstration area agency and setting forth the powers and duties thereof. S. 319 for an act authorizing the use of voting computer systems by cities and towns at primaries and elections . S. 521 for an act requiring housing authorities to provide community lounges or centers in housing for the elderly projects. S. 522 for an act providing that local housing authorities prepare plans for the activities of the elderly in housing for the elderly projects. S. 611 for an act establishing an automatic increase for old age • assistance recipients based on the federal cost of living index. S. 679 for anresolve providing for an investigation and study of the problems of air pollution, noises and other menaces to public health and safety. S. 895 for an act providing that persons who are not registered voters of a town but are part-time residents thereof and pay real estate taxes in said town may vote at town meetings . H. 515 for an act requiring school committees to reimburse teachers for sums expended for improving their skills and authorizing the state board of education to make loans to certain teachers for attending certain graduate schools. H. 728 for an act to amend the racial imbalance law as applicable to new school construction. H. 729 for an act to amend the racial imbanance law as effecting pay= ment of school aid funds . H. 748 for an act authorizing the opening of ballot boxes and the counting of votes in towns within four hours of the closing of the polls. • H. 1039 for an act providing mandatory special classes for certain physically handicapped children. H. 1040 for an act providing for co-operative education programs for state employees . Legislative Bulletin -106- 18167 -: 5/12/67 H. 1053 for an act repealing the law prohibiting the opening of ballot boxes and the counting of votes in towns until the polls are closed. H. 1223 for an act further amending the elections of representative bargaining agents with political subdivisions of the Commonwealth. H. 1266 for an act providing for an investigation and study by a special commission of the feasibility of modifying the requirement of giving notice to public utility companies before excavations are made in public ways . H. 1487 for an act repealing the lien on property of certain recipients of old age assistance . H._1567 for an act providing a tax abatement for certain homeowners who have children attending private schools . H. 1726 for an act extending the jurisdiction and authority of police officers of cities and towns . H. 1848 for an act providing that any municipal police officer' s power to arrest shall extend throughout the Commonwealth. H. 1976 for an act providing that all communities include kinder- garten in their school system. H. 1987 for an act permitting absentee voting in town, city and state primaries . H. 2364 for an act to provide supplementary aid to cities and towns for municipal services rendered to private , non-profit educational institutions . H. 2389 for an act repealing the right of redevelopment authorities to exercise the power of eminent domain. H. 2793 for an act establishing the Massachusetts Police academy and the training of all newly appointed police officers and other performing police ,duties . • (lei# of '*Ulem, tt�stt�I��zse##s • ,„,N S Planning 'Pnttrb john 6. scrag, 3r. May 16, 1967 4eralb 9. �McCarfhll AichSalem, �fael FRAVfnabi a Q, fflafaseacrhixsetts freet ,Albert A. Vitraff , �agmnna �. �(nemeg To the Honorable City Council, Louis A. Swiniuch, President City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: With reference to our letter of May 8, in which the Planning Board requested permission to hold public hear- ings on the evening of May 31st in the Council Chamber, we have received no reply. • May we call this to your attention, and hope that you would act favorably on this request. Very truly yours, JMG:cc � d`/ v bz- All 'aio.; . / ChairmaF CITY PLANNING BOARD • MASSACHUSETTS:ELECTRIC • .> . 'COMPANY INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND 'DISTRIBUTION-EQUIPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS , ,. 1. ' Upon request from a-developer proposing-to • construct a qualifying development of single real- deuce houses, and subject to the provisions herein- after set forth, the Company will provide electric service in public'or private ways.through an under- ground distribution system to be installed throughout the.entire development. A qualifying development of single residence houses,is.a land,area defined in-a • real estate development plan approved by the muni- cipality, and situated where no electric distribution system exists and-.where no other electric distribution system,will be required. . 2. .The-developer must 4 present a plan showing the`physical sequence:.in which the residences are to be built and indicating the estimated elapsed time within which the total development will be completed.Both the:physical sequence and.estimated elapsed time of completion shall be subject to the approval of the Company as reasonable. , , 3.' The'charge to the developer for 'work done by the Company'shall'be as follows: ' (a) for a•minim um of 6 sequential residences, 'no charge except foradditionalcosts in- curred due to unusual conditions, in a - development approved by the Company 'under..paragraph 2 hereof. (b)"'iii the case'of approved developments,of less than 6 sequential residences.or de- 'velopments not approved by the Company ".' under paragraph 2 hereof,the differential between the cost of the'underground ' system' and. that of. standard overhead • , construction,'computed for each such de- ' ,velopment':individuslly:' 4., In In•addition tothe costs specified in paragraph 3 above, the developer„at.;his,.expense,-must, do all excavating, back-filling and surfacing,in accordance with plans and-specifications to he'provided'by'.the Company,and in compliance ,with requirements of • public authorities having jurisdiction. The primary and:aecondary,cables will be'placed in 'the streets by the-Company and; in general;between the paved surface and the immediately adjacent property line. They,will be„Iocated 36 inches below final grade when the"Electric-Company,is±the sole,,oce(ipant of the trench. I£ the trench. is to-,be jointly occupied by the Telephone Company'and Electric Company, the Electric,Company cables willtbe located,42 inches below final grade. The:earth.at'least,4.inches below and above'the;cables'.must pass through'% inch ' mesh screen'and"be'free, of-materia"' that might damage;,the cables.,The Company..shall ,be notified .at least,7,.days, in prior,to,;the day'on.which,.trenches • will be prepared:and available for stallation of..,the underground, distribution.,system. ..Back-filling;;of trenches.shall:,prmeed as soon as the Company has completed.cable installations . .,;_.,�u� t, �;�,;,, .,,. `o 5.r-The'developer-.shall provide,space for;.trans- .foriners,.at locations to be specified by.the Company. Such locations,shall be on-private.property approxi- • mately 6 feet.back from the-street line and centered on.the•boundary,between.abutting:,propertiesy:and each space shall be properly.prepared.in',accordance with,,,Company.. specifications. The,ideveloper shall Also; establish final grades and place and;maintain .stakes,showing,;elevation of such final .grades.i 07 •;16. The,developer, shall furnish.to theXompany, .without- ebst; permanent `easements.::acceptable,.,to the Compariy:for (a).transformer. installations;::in- cluding the,!cable connections,n(b),seeondary;:con- rection„points to.beAocated-2. feet. back,from •the street line on.the boundary,between abutting proper- ties,_and (c) any other underground installations to.be made;,in private-ways or ion.private property. ,. '7c Underground systems mstalled in accordance witl;,the above-provisions shall'be,owned and main- tained bq the Company,except.for secondary service conductors and other devices described in paragraphs 8'And 9 below:' {•• - � ' ��' ew 5 -The,. secondary, service,, conductors running from. secondary-„connection. points..:or.,transformer .iocations.to residences-shall b@ provided; owned and maintained,by the customers.in compliance with the ,provisions.:of the "Informatron-&_Requirements for Electric Service” publishedby the,Company and with any local ordinances or,Bylaws-applicable thereto. Suck-conductors may, at'the Customer's option; be ' installed m duct or consist ofa;Company��approved typerof direct burial`cable -_ ""' -* `9. Customers shall supply,one or, more Company appr"oved.meter;mount.deviees located on,the.oiits1 e • of"their residbices,and,cable connectrons-from;�tlie ground to such devicesshallbe..enclosed in�galvaiy ized`,coudult 'mechanically�co'mled to aueli`devices.. _ r Effective'April�1;-1967-41" MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY 205 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01971 ®o nd May 22, 1967 tem Mr. John M. Gray, Jr., Chairman Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: We have'reviewed your draft of proposed amendments to the sub-division control regulation and commend you for the time and effort put into thisstudy. Section H, paragraphs a through k, has recently been modified by the Massachusetts Electric Co. to the advantage of the developer and, of course, the ultimate owner. It is possible that additional revisions could be made. Any policy change by the Electric Company would require a change in the regulations. This could prove cumbersome to the Planning Board. May we offer the following for your consideration. We feel this general • wording would leave your amendments much more flexible. H. Underground Electrical Systems 1. Installation of Underground Distribution Equipment for Residential Developments a. The entire electric distribution system within the development, including the street lighting system, shall be of the underground type. b. The electric distribution system shall be installed in accordance with the Massachusetts Electric Company's policy relative to the "Installation of Underground Distribution Equipment for Residential Developments" which is in effect on the date that construction is scheduled to start. c. The street lighting system shall be of a design and type normally furnished by Massachusetts Electric Company and approved by the City. It shall be installed by the Massachusetts Electric Company in accordance with the Company's policy relative to underground supplied street light systems which is in effect on the date that construction is scheduled to start. Very truly yours, • MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY F. E. Waldron Supervisor - Distr. Field Eng. 1 4" i r May 22, 1967 The Planning Services Group, 18 Eliot Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts Gentlemen: A few months ago, your firm was selected by the Salem Planning Board, to provide consulting and planning services for the Board. At the time, the specific services were not decided upon because the Redevelopment Pro— gram of the City had not been acted upon. At this time however, the program has been started so the Planning Board now can definitely chart its own course. Without limiting the scope of the program, the Planning Board, wishes to use every means possible to help in the overall planning, which of course includes Redevelopment. The Planning Board is therefor authorizing your firm to proceed on a time and material basis, to provide consulting services for the Board. Such services will include but will not be limited to, such services that will fully implement the work of the Board for all programs originally con— templated in the Comprehensive Plan. The Board also wants full information on various HUD programs that would be applicable to Salem. Updating the Workable Program, Capital Improvements Program, Neigh— :'tborhpptd.�Analysis, Review of the Master Plan, will be included within the scope of your services. -All such work shall start at once! Interim reports should be mailed to the Board each month;4an itemized bill covering all your services should be also filed monthly. The scope of your services will be revised after your reports are filed. Very truly yours, JMG:cc SALEM PLANNING BOARD BY ChairmaR 4 CGr 1 / i i. /Y/J _� �c ✓ .P/Ji / 4✓ �S SLGGcE.o - --fTY T•h.G. _..JAG.c/y, _-. . ✓�C ea -fRe ro /�/zo U/O .Z :r 7-7- C .. 4,Vo ,. GAN <N C, 41?o . �r rNG rl TiVG S�` c. f✓ c S�/Zv✓ eet 4✓Zec W124L (Jl�oR B-cC`/Us'r- i/!G Xr fi/ + ; re,41C 4v0 &JC,Lie-P, f'/aG RoCICA A-t Nfjr Tt-Cv 5'T.lRr4,0 44ti 7-4/C /G1id/c /ec r_; �G ,sR,o !✓//�llt,J Cep lJ�j/ti /i Tc y- Cii/l.PT /rs' oc✓.rr COu,efC ✓a / vC Tul SCci� � Of P/✓e /RoC24rn ! / 4,c- < c 11v41•,vG o .r2o 4JiSa4s ro (1ST �vEzy /ht/rtif /moo ff/� BGG io NGG� /N T4C dt co v2S6 !i/ ccunGs �Colvtco/arr� .ctir .. �/✓C /� ii N N/�✓G �o ✓t 2 0 /S' T'i✓c2Z f o,� /f 41 /ZIA' G J-au r / Rn, Ya /:P.lcaGSCvi 41 e- R✓fs/s , ry t, zo �eaG CC owSi/4r /hG SL /Zv , CLf roe re. c- Eo-1R.0 d UCN SL' 2viGes La /4,c M/ CZvDz evr W /LC /var ,4G Ct/hirGr� Ta c!✓ SC i2UiGGt r/✓-r 4✓ 1e- iC u c L f✓ //n/,o c C/✓r r4l L 4/o R K CA rer,c a RA Foe 44 Co!✓ rzm� G� r,co /4, r/✓ xo C a /h� .¢ zb✓c.vf,vt �GhJ✓ , /11,-c /Fo LJe,vrf Fu(, C. 11�7fo �Ci+a4'4/ 11.4 ,e/ o ./ I' !-/� Rv AtCe-4mr rk. L✓ Oven 4,PPc/ CRQcK 7Q s r! !J/iYshG 74l. �i�/ a .e/�AyGC � CSG /Z.R,l+i/ - I �GG SUGi/ - LVO �lG � d�1LG TY� ri ij r o ki C L- �.v2!s- i M .4d?-eO ro T4G 7FAA e ,G4G4i /�a 0r 4 ,Qo <i f.M / Z,tD �/GC CO s/e, ? /[vC /rGG ydu sZ SG aUs GE,S Sal n u4. 0 BG It LSU- /� / GGen m 0 A,A, cyrAe - Scoj, t of yovsL S4v/ cGs L✓<<c 3� � RL✓/ CEV /fFrte / au32 1.r- cke-,o ^ CK7 �j G I I i I i . M � l CITY PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF CHANGE OF TIME The Planning Board meeting scheduled for June 1, 1967 will be held on May 31, 1967, in the Council Chamber, City Hall, after a public hearing on Subdivision Con- trol Law and Zoning amendments. May 16, 22, 1967 J�M. Jre (.' iairman CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD .Notice gf,Change of.Time The Planning Board meeting I - .scheduled for June 1, 1967,1 �wiil be held on May 31, 1967, ,in the Council Chamber, City; Hall, after a Public hearing on Subdivision Control Law and Zoning amendments. JOHN M. GRAY, JR., ' ki May 16, 22, 196,7Chairman. �j y PgMCTIVE COVSKANT j The undersigned, SALEM ACRES. JMC. , a Massachusetts • Corporation, of Everett , County of Middlesex, Massachusetts, hereinafter called the COVMMMTOR, having submitted to the City of Salem, Massachusetts, Planning Board a definitive plan of subdivision entitled, "Subdivision Plan Subdivision Witchcraft Heights Street Names. Crescent Drive, Summit Street, Owner: Salem Acres, Inc. , June 1, 1965, Carter i Towers, Seg. Corp. , Swampscott, M►es. ," does hereby covenant and agree with said Planming Board and the successors in office of said Board, pursuant to O. L. (Ter. Bd. ) Chapter 41, Sec, S1V, as amended that 1. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding • upon the successors and assigns of the COvMVjff R and its successors in title to the premises shown on said plan as Lots 4 through S, inclusive, 28, 299 128 through las inclusive and especially binding on said Salem Acres, Inc. 2. The construction of the ways and the installation of municipal services shall be provided to serve any of the above-mentioned lots in accordance with the applicable Rules and Regulations of said Board before such lots may be built upon or conveyed, other than by mortgage deedl provided that a mortgagee who &c- quires title to the mortgaged premises by foreclosure • or otherwise and any succeeding owner of the mortgaged promises or part thereof, say sell any such lot, sub- ject only to that portion of this covenant which pro- vides that no lot so sold shall be built upon until ` ."ouch w4ys,7-mond ervicss Sivej l ' prew ided to servo , i sueft 101. • 9. It is understood and agreed by the undersigned that the provision of Paragraphs 1 and 20 as hereinbefore • sot forth, as pertaining to a particular lot or lots shown an said subdivision plans may be waived in writing by the said Planning board upon the provision by the undersigned of security sutficients in the opinion of the Planning Hoard, for the construction !I and completion of the ways and municipal services necessary to provide access and services to such lot or lots. 4. Mothing herein shall be doomed to prohibit a can - voyanoo subject to this covenant by a single deed of pa the entire rami of land horeinabov enumerated on the subdivision plan or of all lots not previously • raises" b the Planning Hoard. • y s. This coveemant shall take effect as of May Oft 1967 and be recorded with Sees South District Registry of Deeds. nneaut•d as a sealed instrument this /9 day of i Mays 1967. SALEM ACRES, MC. By I AM 1Z UQO HUES, I cWCHWALTH Q MASSACHUSETTS Resext as. may �� 1967. Then personally appeared Ugo DiBiase, President of Salon • Aures, Inc. , and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be the tree act and decd of the said Salem Ac , In ore so �itV of $akm, fflassarhusiette, 9 Offire of the TitV (9IErk .. 19 atc:g 9tiKs Foam 1 nub 3 TOR 3611 May 29, 1967 Planning Board City Hall Salem, Mass. Dear Sirs: At a regular meting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, May 25, 1967 it Has voted to grant the Board permission to use the Council Chamber an Wednesday, May 31st, 1967 for a public hearing. • Very truly yours d AJT/hc AIIC� OQmY_'!?�C CITY CLERK 1 w W�lC�/,O 4Y&ee11 Aj1&&1 02167 June 1,1967 Attention: City or Town Clerk Planning Division Dear Sir: To update the continuing process of Regional Planning, .we must .have at our disposal the most recent Master Plans, Zoning ordinances and Zoning Maps of all the cities' and towns in the Metropolitan Area Planning Council region. Currently such material is being used for studies of highway, rapid transit, water and sewer, and industrial development. We anticipate making more extensive use of this material in the future. 1. We have (dernet—have) a copy of your_akg.Master Plan. 2. We have (do-natr-have4 a copy of your Zonfng ordinances. 3. •We have (do--not-izave) a copy of your iLf4 Zoning Map. If there are any or later editions of this. information,. you will be extending a great service to the Commonwealth .of Massachusetts by forwarding to my attention a copy of each issue. Ve tru y yours, .V pont Planning Section JPD/d w W,XAWJdreet, Aj ry 0210E June 1, 1967 Attention: City or Town Clerk Planning Division Dear Sir: To update the continuing process of Regional Planning, we must have at our disposal the most recent Master Plans; Zoning Ordinances and Zoning Maps of all the cities and towns in the Metropolitan Area Planning Council region. Currently such material is being used for studies of highway, .repid transit, water and sewer, and industrial development. We anticipate making more extensive use of this material in the future. 1. We have (do-neb-hmm) a copy of youriji Master Plan. • 2. We have (de-ix*-have) a copy of yousl_9 },Zoning Ordinances. 3. We bra (do not have) a copy of your " ;oniing Map. If there are any or later editions of this information. you will be extending a great service to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts by forwarding to my attention a copy of each issue. Very truly yours, Aephtp. Dupont Planning Section JPD/d June 70 1967 Boston Mimeo & Steno Service, 50 Broad Street, Boston, Mass. 02109 Gentlemen: Enclosed are mark up prints together with the originals for the subdivision regulations and the zoning ordinance. Would you please correct the originals according to the marking on the plans, and also correct the numbering of the pages, as in both cases I haBe added and deleted certain sections. • After all of the originals are corrected, please return dir- ectly to (Mrs, ) Christine Callahan, Room 7, City Hall, Salem, Mass. Very truly yours, JMG:cc a rman' a+R-�,�. June 8, 1967 Gawb IL 04"ft 34 Ca=a *"d 1pww IWAGIMSM JW=, ARM a� Amwt�LTH"ff PapumbA.$bIMa ftal B.11 tchell, City Engineer Salem, Mass. Dear Sir: This is a list of approved plans submitted to the Planning Board by Salem Acres, Inc., that show changes in street and lot lines: Form C Filed Feb. 4, 1965 Recorded 104/55 Form A Oct. 7, 1965 105/46 Form A Dec. 2, 1965 105/81 Form A Feb. 29 1966 Land Court Plan 8560 I'' • Form A May 59 1966 5382/1 Form A Sept. l5, 1966 5393/800 Form B Sept. 15, 1966 5393/ 800 Form C Oct. 6, 1966 Land on and off Ord Street, Witch- craft Road, Summit Street, Albion Street Extension and Crescent Drive We trust this will prove beneficial to you in compiling the informa- tion you require. Very truly yours, MP:cc Clark �1 v r AA.V bio J - -I N 1 c - _I/s -- _ - (gitg of Anlem, 'Mttssar4metts RECENED • , w' f Peparfuterd of Public Porks DAY to W NEAL B. MITCHELL pauc PROUTY BUT. CITY [NOIN[6N May 26..1967. .. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re: Witchcraft Heights Subdivision. Gentlemen: Enclosed find copy of Council Order that this office make a survey of streets in the above referenced subdivision and compare the actual locations with that shown on plans approved by your board. It is necessary to obtain from you, a list of all Planning Board approved plans that show changes in street, and/or lot lines so that this order can be complied with. Please suppiy such a list within the nest week or ten days. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer Encl: Council order • ,t{sjl!i$? �GONp7 ' CITY OF SALEM ' �14INµM_N ' In City Council' Ordered: 62 LZ ,. f f ♦ H ` 1 4yi �{Yv l A.{ t Joseph Leeds - University of Mass. sent letter December 1966 hase re- ceived hq answer. (Situ? of �$R em, sear4 lSe#t8 00 JIB$ pmb Sohn gyp.", h. June 8, 1967 Gavib IL prentim 34 Chunk AWWI F ��L %,=, PAgmmb W_*"t University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts Atten:-Mr. Joseph Leede Dear Sir: The Mayor's office has informed this Board of notifi- cation from you to the effect that you had sent a letter to the City Planning Board in December of 1966, and had re- ceived no reply. The minutes of the Board's meeting on April 21, 19662 include this statement : "A letter from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst was read. This was a request for a map of the City with ward boundaries indicated, also, statistical information for a research project. We are for- warding a map of the City and a copy of the Comprehensive Plan". We have no record of the receipt of another letter. Very truly yours, MP:cc Clerk of �$ttlent, 'Mttssar4use##s • Flaming 20aarb 304a A Gran, Ir. June 6, 1967 pic4ael faaka(aaki 34 (94u44 �t tet ,Albert X. facoff Aalem, �fae.aclptaetia Y_rymo"X. J%nnq Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on May 31, 1967, it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan 1. Applicant - Raymond L. Cummings, Trustee of the Loring Realty Trust, 70 Washington Street, Salem • 2. Location and Description - Lots Al, B. and C Station Road 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Regis- try Book 3613 Page 512 Very truly yours, MP:cc Clerk • C tv of �zlem, 'fflassar4usetto • ��u@,e ��2IY1Y1tYI$ �IIFIXd (6itg pull Aalem, fflussacllusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., --Ma-Y 3l ------------------------------ -19-67-- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (ire •-) said__ lots have a frontage on a way in existence when the subdivision control law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ..became_effectiye_and-meet__all__the__reoui_r__ements---o£ Sect__ 11-A Clause C and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant -Raymond_L---Cummings_,--Tx-ustee_-of_the-_L_o�ring---Realty-TFust__ Address ---------7-0__WAshi.ngton__atre_et,_Sal-e-m,_Maas__.----------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _.._R-nbert..B__Bowman------------------------------------------__________________------ Address _c�o_.Qslzoxn__kalmer.,Inc�_¢__15_Wallis_Street_,__Peabodys__Mass. 3. Deed of property records in ---Essex__snuth-District-----------------Registry Book--3613 r.............. Page....512------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: Three---(.3-)- ceitain__lots__of landon__the northerly ------------------ side__of__Station_Rtzad__shoyg __ae__lots_A1_,_B_and_C__on_a _plan_e --------------------------------titled "Plan of I,and---in_-Salem-Property__of_Loring_ Realty_Trust,_ May__91__1967, Osborn Palmer, Irtc�_,__15__ylallis___Street,__Peabody_!!,---s_aid-1ot_s-be-ing—a- e-s i -- y'g$]20X-rf_-Pa�;iRci 2e6i-ai�.z-w�.v a�33 d—l�ee�S............ Beel��7;Paan-�9'. 6'/616 Signature of OwnerAg;—_ i_ '� iv�_t_�! Trnatee Address __-7-4_Washingion__Strep t,__Salem;__Mass________________ • �Y If CHC of $alem, �ttssttclluse#s Pepartnunt of Fuhlir Works NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENOINKER June 5,196'7. Planning Board tChurch Street alem, Mass. Re: Two lots on Station Road. Gentlemen; Please be advised that there is a water main and a sewer main in Station Road suitable for servicing houses without cellars on lots A and C as shown on "Plan of Land in Salem, Property of Loring Realty Trust, Scale: 1". i+0' May 9,1967, Osborn Palmer , Inc. 15 Wallis Street , Peabody" . permanent road was recently constructed in front of these lots. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer cc enclosed for Loring Realty Trust Ward Matthew ` Michaud Lo ring R�ItyTrustHo tnett 61.81 .. tt CI TY 0; T T $ DIPAIN EASSALEM WEN T f 20�WIDE) 4? w 'CY in N A C I ., '8 o '�' �a o` z w 7, 287`SF. 7, 360 S.F N CD a BIn LID o� • 158`S,E._' v, CO 2p E L-70.00 L=44.38 6 5� R=400.00 s L=5.50 _==:SrAT I ON RO sa it• NOTE Lot 8 to be conveyed to abutting owner. t� 3YikvNA7F PLAN of - LAND in SALEM Property of Loring Realty Trust Sc ale: I".= 4d May 9 J 967 OSBORN PALM ER,INC. 15 Wallis Street, Peabody ! " (jttu of AnInu, g8 thli$P S June 14, 1967 384•p-pro, imla 9- 64w4Y RECORD OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD MAY 31, 1967 34 94=4 $trod FaVaumb A.Ab«mn On May 31, 19679 the Planning Board of the City of Salem, held a public hearing, conducted as follows: Part I - Amendments to the Rules and Regulations Governing Sub- division Control Part 2 - Amendments to the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance This hearing was held in the Council Chambers and was chaired by John M. Gray, Jr., with Albert Pitcoff and Michael Paskowski in attendance. City officials present and participating were-:Councillor Edmond J. Perron, and Building Inspector Daniel J. O'Brien, Jr. The audience consisted of six at the beginning and swelled to twenty-five as the meeting progressed. Copies of the newspaper advertisement were made available to all, and were used as a basis in conducting the hearing. PART I The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M. with Part I first on the agenda. The chairman made a brief introduction and laid down the rules of the hearing, namely, that parliamentary law would be followed and that this would not be a forum for debate but that speakers for the affirmative and negative would be heard and their views recorded for future consideration. Work was begun with the reading of the notice by the clerk. Then the chairman followed the routine of taking each article or sub-article sepaa rately and in order, and explaining the nature, meaning, and purpose of the change. Next, the chairman asked for speakers in the affirmative, then the negative. Quick progress was being made as there were no speakera pro or con in the first nine articles. Then Attorney George Vallis came in and asked for backtracking. He asked for clarification of Article 2 (Definitive Plan should have sufficient data not to require two or three return trips ), Ar- ticle 6 and Article 7 (Granite Curbing still required). As expected, Article 10 which deals with the inspection of underground installations before covering produced considerable discussion. Speakers were: Councillor Edmond J. Perron, • Ernest Belleau, 35 Belleau Road, Salem Thomas Johnson, 221 Castle Road, Nahant Henry Boucher, 11 Fairfield Street, Salem Attorney Raymond Cummings, 3 Federal Court. 2 - The chairman summarized, and Councillor Perron concurred that even though the city has competent. men who could inspect work at a subdivision as required by Ordinance, the fact of the matter is that they are not al- ways available immediately when desired. This holds up the developers, and can mean a considerable loss of time and money to them. It is also clear that for the City to hire an inspector for this pur- pose, it would be necessary to create a full time Civil Service position. This could not be justified as there is not enough work for a full time inspector. The article proposes that in order to circumvent Civil Service, the developer place a part time inspector on his payroll who would be avail- able on call. This inspector would be of the City Engineer's choosing and responsible to him. William Mahoney, 8 Castle Road, Salem, stated that in his opinion, an inspector working for the City but being paid by the developer constituted a conflict of interest. Article 11 had no speakers. Article 12, dealing with underground utilities produced a lively dis- cussion. Statements made, but not necessarily in order, were as follows: Chairman John Gray said that the telephone and electric power companies told him that they are going underground in all future Salem installations. The amendments are simply spelling this out. Councillor Perron asked whether a single trench could be used for all pipe and cable installations. Mr. Cummings said that in ledge areas, the requirement of separate trenches for pipe and placing telephone and power lines underground would be too costly, and price the lot out of the reach of the market. Mr. Belleau said that biasting could damage underground wiring, and could create danger from electrocution. The remainder of the articles had no speakers, pro or con, and the hearing was rapidly concluded. Intermission was called. NO z m # # PART 2 0 After a short recess, the chairman called the meeting to order at , 9:20 P.M. for Part 2 of the hearing. Again, copies of the newspaper ad- vertisement were used as a basis. Work was begun with the reading of the ipimpaper noticestiy, theLclerk:, Neat, each article was taken separately and '.i order, and read by the clerk. • 3 - . The'+chairman would follow with appropriate remarks of explanation, such as "a better definition", " a new definition", "straighten out a coning lin® Otc., as the case may be. Questions or comments from the audience were .gen- %-erally for the purpose of clarification. . Finally, the chairman asked if ., there were any pros, then, any cons, and the proceeddre was repeated ,on the next article. Except where noted below, in a few articles, there was little or no. comment, and no pros or cons recorded. ~w= Cha ter 35, Section V (Page 16) - Use Regulations. Councillor Perron :4 presented the hypothetical case where a visitor to a family arrived with a house trailer; told he could get a thirty (30) day parking permit. MI }, Chapter 35, Section V-B, Par. 4 (Page 25 ) R-3 Districts - new aytb-item m W Garden type (multi-family dwellings) As expected there was conA idera- ble ,comment, and all of a nature which indicated that the article was not clearly understood. ; As an explanation and summary, the chairman said that at present, a multi-family house over two stories high can be built using Type I (Rein- forced concrete) or Type II (Structural Steel Frame) construction. Under this article, Type VI (Wood Frame ) construction can be used providing guide-lines specified are followed. Since Type VI construction is cheaper, ! it_"broadens the working tools and opportunities of the builder. This article furthermore takes Garden Type Housing out of "Sp"ecitiil Per I • mit" area requiring Board of Appeal hearing, and places it under permitted ' uses",where a builder deals directly with the Building Inspector. Councillor Perron asked why the larger lot area of 3000 square feet per dwelling unit was required for Garden Type, while 1000 square feet per unit was required for a high-ride dwelling; also, why more parking area. Aj There were no contrary comments recorded, and it is assumed all were + in favor. Chapter 35, Section VIIC (Page 38) Par. 6 - "Required Parking". A -in garage is considered a parking space. s question was asked whether a built . Answer - yes. Chapter 35, Section VII Par. E (Page 12) 'Signs". An owner doing bus- iness at the corner of Webb and Fort Avenue under Board of Appeal permit, ., stated that he is restricted to a ridiculously small business sign. He was told that all signs have been placed under the Building Code, and that some' of it has been rewritten. He may get some relief now. ) .. UNDER CHANGES ON ZONING MAP , No. 3 - Ward 3 = Concerning changing some land off Highland Avenue from R-C�to R-3, District: Speaking "against", Mr. Mahoney said he is talking for the people in • ' the area, and that he himself owns land there. He said. the people worked . S herd to have it zoned R-C in the first place. It is essentially muddy land and drains hundreds of acres, including part of Highland Avenue. He said that the Audubon Society and the Department of Natural Resources .are inter- ested in keeping it R-C. Mr. Jodin also placed his name in opposition. Speaking "for" was Dr. Pocharski, one of the owners, He disputed the dtatepent that it was muddy land. In fact he said the city was consider- ing it as a school site. He spoke of development piano for the area which oauld benefit him and the city. However, he did not make plain whether. these were firm plans or an artist's conception. No. 4 - Ward 5 - Concerning the changing of R-2 District between B-4 on each side on Canal Street, to B-4: Attorney Baker::placed his name in favor. Ho. 6 - Ward 7 - Henceforth, refer to State Teachers College as State College at Salem. It was at the request of Dr. Meier who was not at the meting, ` This completed the agenda. The hearing was declared over at 11:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk Y :i • f Oe X!, 111!!! l yam-- -- ---- �,jrr�-z9�'�C ,(o-�- •�^�-riys� �-r�.(CJ��+tr-,r�.Zru�&.tty — - e � •1� _ . 1` I ._ .__ _. __ _ ___-_-. -. __ ._-_ - _ _ - - __- _ _ - -_ _ ___ -_ ._ _ 4. ' I ' • r^ 1 n. _ - .-- - Awl Ir - - - - _ - �, .. .__.__._ -____.______.�___ �.T_ -__._ _ __-- _Y- ccs-►.-���?�c.m...� ` 51 r J KFIr .. .- - .__'�___ (7/–Y-'4—.��,_.,pp, _._ �-�1+`-0_-- _-�d_)f✓ �C-")�Xy„¢•G1C _ _ �dl��(� L� . : �� 4 - - - - --_ -,-- -, - -- --- - -- i- - . _. _ - �- - - --- --- - -- - i _ . . . -- -___ _- _. _ _ _ --- - - - _ _. _ --- -- __ - • - -�-- -- -- - - ---- -----_i _ � - - ----- -- - i I j I I � + I � j I I � i f - '• " ' j 'I• I i � I � i I I � � 1 I i i 1 f , i �F .j • Ao _. ._- ice¢•-�.u,�.,_c�..��.��.-�.�4 I � I I I I 1 I I I i - I I ' I I I I I I I I I i - . 4 • FC, rz, , G- -- -/-- -v c -r tie tiP_et�._ —� ee� GO e - s Gam,, � S � � � � i i � � � ' �I � i i i I I � i I� i ; � I i j 1 � � � j I I i. I � I � I � i j I � � � � a I I � i I I I I r I f i , � I i i �� I I I ! I i � I I � I ! ', j � ( i l i j I i I I ( � � I � � I � i I i ' � � I i I � I I I I � ( j � � � , I I I � � I i �� I I I � � I � I I I � j l I � I � � I F i I � I � I I � I ' j i f � ; � i � � � I i � � � � I I � I � I I � j � � � ! I r i j � � i I � � � I � j I ; I I � I �. ', I j � i i i � I I i ' I � I I 'i I I I � � i ! � I � I I i i i i ; I i r I I I I ` I � I ' I I i � � I I f i � I j � i � i i � I � � I I S I i i � I I � I i j � , � I ! j i i ; I j I i , I i I �� I I � I � I - i � � � � j i , 1 , i s I � /-rte- 6 . 1 . --- - - =- - - I I i . � . ; J Vag Of $� x isms 16, 1967 � ` iokk*d Odom. ` AmEdIL ' - joba Barrett, ^ � Eze'cative Director Salam Redevelopomr. Authority, p. 0. Boz 369, Sales, Rase. , Dear Mr. Barrett The Capital Improvements Program for Salem, 1967-19729 prepared by Mayor Franeia 1, Collins and the Salem Planning M` Services Board with the technical assistance of the Planning • - Group, has the endorsement of the Salem Planning Board as a - ' guide to the Planning Board with respect to Capital ezpendi- a h turas for public improvements, 1967-1972• ` Very truly yours, x ' M JM:cc SAMM PLANNING BOARD q . 4 i}ypXyA,vr ' f hr 4 ' t ?.K. q. .d�R� Y: _ }. � f•.. Mt. < .:..... 4....:n+n.o.. xwai.w .'.vl`Y.�-✓iu� • �..- FF Tiff_ -e .S �t ? of Saltrt, SS th1I$E 8 � � ts4�Ork4 34 94=4 j9tad Awe=. pp"Anseft parama X Arn"n . June 20, 1967 Charles G. Cowan Associates, 847 North Main Street, Providence, Rhode Island Gentlemen: We are enclosing herewith a marked up copy of the Salem Subdivision Regulations. The markings which are either in red or typewritten copies pasted in, we believe are self—ex— planatory. In all probability, the numbering of the new pages will have to be changed as in certain instances the insertions are fairly lengthy. The items which I have merely changed in red . are to remain exactly the same as in the marked up copy. Please note that in the rear appendix we are inserting six new forms which we want to include as part of this bound volume. There are also four originals of sample drawings which we wish to have bound as part of the appendix. A copy of the revision as we voted on it has been left uncut, and we are enclosing it for use as a reference if you should need it. If you have any questions, please contact the writer at 745-0194. Very truly yours, JMG:cc y air n SAIEM PLANNING BOA . J(z7 � � 4�1J'cc�a�Jfireefi, �o�t ry 02108 June 21, 1967 Attentions Planning Division C u/91 Gentlemen: / Enclosed is a copy of the letter sent to your town on Lhane 1. 1967. To this day, June 21st, we have had no response. Because regional planning is a changing and continuing process; • it -Is necessary to have available all pertinent and current data of each city and town. Thus we are able to present an up-to-date, thorough and precise study of the MAPC area. This study is for your benefit. It will help you in obtaining Federal Funds for worthwhile projects in your town. • very truly yours, seph P. Dupont Planning Section JPD/d Enc. • - r wM �� 7c/zoo0 .Y&eefi, ,Wa& 1 02108 June 21, 1967 SA40,01 Attention: Planning Division Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the letter sent to your town on June LI 1967. To this day, June 21st, we have had no response. Because regional planning is a changing and continuing process, it is necessary to have available all pertinent and current data- 6f .,_each city and town. Thus we are able to present an up-to-date, thorough and precise study of the MAPC- area. This study is for your benefit. It will help you in obtaining Federal Funds for worthwhile projects in your town. avery truly yours, Joseph P. - Dupont Planning Section JPD/d Enc. Ctv of atm 'Massa jIISEttB Sohn A "I It- June 23, 1967 eat a. 2aacearft Pk4=1 f"kabom as 94=4 J$hid 199"t4 �t, 4,R.,n■ d` 8 I€ Mr. John Soanowski, 20 Lemon Street, Salem, Maas. Dear Sir: At the Planning Board meeting held on June 15, it was voted to deny approval to the form A application which you had presented to the Board, believing endorsement under R the subdivision control law was not required. iIt was denied since it would be in violation of the density regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance. You will first need a variance from the Board of Appeal before this board may act on it. Very truly yours, MP:cc er R y S 0 IL June 23► 1967 Mr, Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, . City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on June 15, 1.967, it was VOTED: - NOT to endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan 1. Applicant - John Sosnowski, 20 Lemon Street, Salem, Mass. 2j Location and Description - Parcel "A" Lemon Street Court, Parcel "B" Lemon Street 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 2653 Page 384 Very truly yours, MP':cc Clerk t e June 23, 1967 GityA ust ne J. Toomey, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Tom r �vEo CtV of �$ttivm, Aassar4usetts 3 o5 WlttnttutguttzD CITY UFFICE SALEM MASS. (lCitg �ttll �ttlem, �tussttchusetis FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. June 15, 67` Salem, Mass., -------- ------------ -- --------- - —----19---- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ----------- - John Sosnowsk----------- - --------------- ----------- ------------------- ------------------ -- ----------- - --- ---------- --------- ------ 20 Lemon Street, Salem, Mass. Address ------- - ------- - -- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Edwin--------- - --T- .---Brud ------ -synski------------------ - ---------- ----------- ------------ Address _ 260 Lafayette Street, Salem, Mass. 3. Deed of property records in ---U-0 eX- QUth__DistriCtP-_-_------_Registry Book---2653-------------- Page---394-------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: Land divided by Chain link fence with no opening. Parcel labeled "A" consisting of 1154 sq. ft. can be entered -- -- - - - --------------- - ---------------------- -------------------- --------------------- only byway of Lemon St, Qt• (This building uses as its address #6 ----------------------------------------------7------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lemon St, Ct. ) Parcel "B" fronting on Lemon Street and using the ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- address #20 Lemon Street, consists of 1422 sq ft and is to be soli ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and the present owner and occupant, the applicant, wishes on completion of the sale to move into small 4-room cottage,iet parcel and building labeled "A" on attached plan n p Signature ofOwner 11_a� -_u �l�Geti^E_---___-------__--- 20 on Street, Salem, Mass. Address ----- --------- -------------------- ------------------------- • A . e: EIVED (fity of 'Salem' 'ffla56MP4USrtt5 ll OMIT IT g19varb CITSALEM- MASS. (ffitv pal( j6alem, 'Massachusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ------------ -u(----23--------_-19__x_1 To the Planning Board: (V� The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— ------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. pQ • 1. Name of Applicant ----- _ _ _ ___, f_w______ -- --- ----- ---- ----------------------------------- Address --C2-0--- — p=.a" ��' If° — J7--- (J 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor __ ___/ ._____�S? _ _ u -____-_____---__-________ - B n Address ---Z2U 0------ -- 3. 3. Deed of property records in ^7 ----- ---! 40 Registry Book -3-------- Page-1o'-Y-------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: �_ ,�Q �.--��-- -�-�JA{----�_c_�.�..�e -tee n�///'1��, w� , e`Q• �'WW a"•`.w�`�\ "Ic5 �.✓—^'1,Y i ,i 4,W ��d c Signature of Owner - -/- - - o _-& LV'L�------------------------- Address r MCSWEENEY, CUMMINGS & DONAGHUE WILLIAM H.MCSWEENEY COUNSELLORS AT LAW • 1 - 44 J.M MORGAN J. CSW EENEY lam-1aJ6 70 WASHINGTON STREET RAYMOND L.CUMMINGS SALEM, MASS. HAROLD R.DONAGHUE June 26, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr, 54 Raymond Road Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Proposed amendments to the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board Dear Jack: The evening a short while back on which I saw you at your home to procure your signature to an endorsement on a plan of lots on Station Road you showed me the new printed Forms A,B, and C, at which time I told you I had some doubt as to the legality of the requirements stated on these Forms in relation to the filing of the same with the Planning Board and, the "NOTICE" of • the filing with the City Clerk, and that I would look into it when I got a chance and let you know what I thought about it . I have now done so and it is my opinion that the proposed amendments to the Rules and Regulations in regard to these matters are null and void,,_ and in violation of the Statutes in such cases made and provided. I am sorry that there has been some -considerable delay in my giving attention to this matter but I had been engaged in getting Nonresident Alien Income Tax Returns filed with the International Department of Operations of the Internal Revenue Service in Washing- ton on or before June 15th for the years 1961 through 1966,for a deceased citizen of Chile, of whose estate in this country I -am Co- administrator, and I had to put everything else aside to get them filed on time and I have yet to get caught up with things that are suffering for attention. As you know, the authority of the Planning Board to amend its Rules and Regulations is by virtue of the provisions of Section 81Q, of Chapter 41, of the General Laws, which provides in part as follows: "- - - -, a planning board shall adopt, and, in the same manner, may, from time' to time, amend, reasonable rules and regulations rela- tive to subdivision control not inconsistent MCSWEENEY,CUMMINGS S DONAGHUE Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. June 26, 1967 • with the subdivision control law or with any other provisions of a statute or of any valid ordinance or by-law of the city or town - - - "Such rules and regulations shall not require referral of a subdivision plan to any other board or person prior to its submission to the planning board - - - -". "Once a definitive plan has been submitted to a planning board, and written notice has been given to the city or town clerk pursuant to section eighty-one T and until final action has been taken thereon by the planning board "When a preliminary plan referred to in section eighty-one S has been submitted to a planning board, and written notice of the submission of such plan has been given to the city or town clerk, such preliminary plan and the definitive plan evolved therefrom shall be governed by the rules and regulations relative to • subdivision control in effect at the timeof - the submission of the preliminary plan - - Section 81P provides in part as follows: "Any person wishing to cause to be recorded a plan of land situated in a city or taw in which the subdivision control law is in effect, who believes that his plan does not require approval under the subdivision control law, may submit his plan to the planning board of such city or town in the manner prescribed in section eighty- one T - - - -"• Section 81T provides in part as follows : "Every person submitting a definitive plan of land to the planning board of a city or town for its approval or for a determination that approval is not required shall give written notice to the clerk of such city or town by de- livery or by registered mail, postage prepaid, that he has submitted such a plan. If the • MCSWEENEY,CUMMINGS S DONAGHUE Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..3. June 26, 1967 • notice is given by delivery the clerk shall, if requested, give a written receipt therefor to the person who delivered such notice Section 810 provides in part as follows: "No person shall make a subdivision of any land in any city or town in which the sub- division control law is in effect unless he has first submitted to the planning board of such city or town for its approval a plan of such proposed subdivision - -". "A plan shall be submitted under this section when delivered at a meeting of the board or when sent by registered mail to the planning board, care of the city or town clerk. If so mailed, the date of mailing shall be the date of submission of the plan, • Section 81S provides in part as follows: "Any person, before submitting his definitive plan for approval, may submit to the planning board, a preliminary plan, and shall give written notice to the clerk of such city or town by delivery or by registered mail, postage i prepaid, that he has submitted such a plan, If the notice is given by delivery the city or town clerk shall, if requested, give a written receipt therefor. It would appear without doubt that Items 1, 3 and 4 of the pro- posed amendments are "inconsistent with the subdivision control law"* and that it is beyond the power of the Board to effectuate these pro- posed amendments. It follows therefore that the language on the Forms A,B & C relative to "Notice" is inappropriate and should be eliminated. If you have any question about this please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, RLC:p Raymond L, Cummings * This language quoted is taken from Section 81Q, L ,r June 26, 1969 Mr: John M. Gray, Jr. , 54 Raymond Road i Salem;' Masiachus*tts.a41970 ' Re: ,Pr osed amendments to .the Rules and Regnlat ons of the 'Plann no Board Dear Jack: The evening a"short while back on which I saw�you-at your home toprocure your signature to ,an endorsement on .a' plan of lots an .Stati'on Road.you showed me the new prirted_ 'Forms A;B, and C, ;at which time I told you, I tiad some doubt,as• to the legality of the req'uirementsstated on+tfiese Forms in relation to,the • filing of the same-with the`.Planning Board and; the "NOTICE" of the filing- with the;'City Clerk,+ and that I would look into it D w' when I got ,a chance 'and let you'know what i thought about it. I have .now done so•and it i's :my opinion that ihefpioposed amendments to•the Rules and' Regulations in!regardato these matters are null andtvoid, aindr in •violst oii of the Statutes 'in such cases made and provided; , I, am sorry that therehas been some }considerabig delay in my giving attention to this'matter but I. had been engaged in getting. No.mpev dent 4lien, Income Tax Returns filed with the International ' Department •t3f Operations of:°the" in'ter'n'a1 �2e'venue;Serviee�An�!t7ashing> ton,ton or before June 15th, for the years 1961 ,through 1966,for a• a ' deceased citiz' of Chile, .of whose estate`in this oountry I;am .Co- ' administrator, and' I had to,pet everything else`asi.d7to° getti.them, " tiled on time and I have yet to`get caught up with t2iings' thattare v.o suffering for attention; e „' tAr As you knowi the'authority ,of A6,'Pianning 'Board to aa`mend' its Rules and- Regulations is by virtne. of the provisions of, Section 81% of Chapter 41, of the General Laws, which .provides -in .;pait as follows: "- Y- - , a planning board shall adopt, and; in the same manner;, may, from time,,to time; amend, seasonable riles.and)iegulations tela- ' ' �� tive to-subdivision 'controi "not inconsistent Mr. John 1A...Gray, Jr ` ' ! �2, rh June 26; 1967 with the subdivision control taw or with any , other provisions+.of a'statute or of.'any valid ordinance,6i ,by-favi of the city' or �.tos+n i'Such .ru2es and r¢ ulations shall not require referral of a subdivision plan to any other a board or person prior to its .submission to the planning board - - " ,ronce.a,de€initive, plan has been submitted to a planning board, and mitten.notice has been given to the, city or.'tophi clerk pursuant .to ,. e, section eighty=one T and until final action has been taken thereon by the planning board ' !}When a prel£minarq plan referied to in section eighty-one S has- been submitted, to a planning . boaro, and smitten notice of the submission a, suc2i plan has b¢en.given .to .the city or town r •clerk,, such preliminary, planand the ,definitiv¢' plan evolved therefrom :shall 'be governed.,by the rules *and regulationfi•°relative ,te subdivision control, in effect at the time of . the submission ot�the preliminary plan7- - - 'Section 810 provides in pairt as follows; ` "Any person wishing to cause toibe.recorded a plan of land' situated in a, cityF or town in which r , the subdivision controllaw isfin effect, who believes.that his plan ioes`not require approval , ' under the subdivision control yaw; may submit 'bis plan to the planning board_of� such city or town in, the ,manner prescribed in'.section eighty. one T, Section 81T provides in part as folloilsr, ._ ` r "Every person subm£tting. a definitive plan of " land to the planning'boardaof a city' or town for its approval or for a detetmination 'that approval is not required shaliigive written s notice 20 the clerk of such city or town by de- ` livery or by registered mail Ipostage. prepaid, that he has submitted such afplan, ` 1E the F ' p .• Mr. John 'N Gray, .3. June 26, 1467 f i r •! •1 Y•r R ! notice is given by„delivery the cleric shall, if requeste,d,, give_ a written receipt .therefor to the. person who delivered such notice � . section 810 provides in part as°follows i ^No person shah: make a sabdivision of .any and in any city, or•town in,,.wbfth,the sub- `y•''.: division control law is ioeffect :unless he has first subaitted'to'`the,'pkann3ng board of such;clity or town for 'itI's approval: a plan, of such,proposed .subdivision - i i =” i "+°, a i; RSA plan shall' ber,submitted uiader'Ais section when de fveied Wit:a ate¢tirnJ 'of,the;bqA'nd or C +; ivnei sent;byj zegi:terecl mail :tp the 'planning boaid; tcire of"the "city 03et ' n clerk: If so mailed, `the date v# mailing .shall' be the date`of submi cion'of;the plan ,wl: D ,Section 81S provides'in•part as f.4611 s ; •+"^ Y Ko "Any person, before submitting his dig€initive � plan for Iapproval, may+submit to the planning board;` a, preliminary plan, and sbal] give �. . written"notice 'to the clerk of such+city or °town,by, 'delivery or by•ie'916tered na�il.,..postagr prepaid,.`thit 'be has submitted such a plan if=the notice. •is givem��bgfdel very,,the city or tgwan. clerk 'shall, if'req stud, give 'a`written receipt,therefor. + it would appear wiibout ,doubt that14tems 1,, ,3 and 4 of• th¢'pro- posed amendments are '"inconsistent with-the subdivision; control law"* ` and that 'it -is °beyond the power of the Hoard to effectuate theae pro-,, posed aialendments.. It follows' therefore that the 'language on the., Forms" A,8 L' '.G relative, to "Notice"" is inappropriate and ,should be elia na.ted: If you Have any question about this please. feel free to;call me. Very truly yours, • RLC:p Raymond L Cummings ' Thislanguage quoted is taken from Section 8ii2, Ctv of '*ttltm' assar4usetts 9 Flaming 'Poarb Qlifg � jgslem, 'fflttssacllttseffs Vivo NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM "C" APPLICATIONS See Form "C" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: — — — -- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts, 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form C, an application submitted this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting an approval, by the Planning Board, of a definitive plan filed with this application. The subdivision shown on the plan is called " " and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------—-—-—--—----------—---——------- (insert -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (insert streets and street or lot numbers) in Ward ----__---- ----- Signature of Owner -------------------------------------------- -- — StreetAddress — -------------------------------------------------------------- City/Town and State ------------------ —— —— — — — — --- — Telephone Number Ctv of ttlezn, ttss�ct uset#s • ��'���� �[�tcnitl� �a�rD CHe Ann �alew, �Iassac(tuseYfs II197II FORM C APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLAN In accordance with the provisions of Section III-B the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for such determination. The no- tice shall be attached to two copies of the Form C application. The notice and both copies of the ap- plication must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form C, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall he typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -------------------------------------19----- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem. 1. Name of Subdivider -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address --- ----------------------_ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor -------------------- --------------------------------------------- Address -------—----—------ —-------------------------------------------------------------—----—----------—--------- 3. Deed of property recorded in -----------------------------------—----------------------------------------------- Registry, Book ----------------------------------— Page ----—------------—--------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ------- --------------------—_—---------------------------—------ - 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the abutting Owners. Signature of Owner — — — — ---------------- — --- ——— — . Address—---—-------—---—--------------------— — ----— — — — — Telephone Number ---------------------- — — --- — A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. J of �ttlem, fflttssar4use##s • ''�r 1tYItkl$ Pandr Cite xaft Calera, �Iaesschusetts D187D FORM B APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN In accordance with the provisions of Section III-A the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of the submission for such determination. The no- tice shall he attached to two copies of this Form B application. The notice and both copies of the appli- cation must be"date stamped"by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form B, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ---------------------19-------- To the Planning Board: • The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Preliminary Plan of property located in the City of Salem for tentative approval as a subdivision as allowed under the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem. 1. Name of Subdivider ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --– – – – Address ---------------------–----------------------------------------------------–---------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----------–-------------------------------------------------------- Address ---–------------------------------------------------------------------------–----–---------------------------- 3. Deed of property recorded in -_--____-___–___-_-------- Registry, Book -------------------- Page ------------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -------–--------–-----------------------------–----------------------------– 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan with the names and addresses of the abutting Owners. Signature of Owner.-----------------------------------—--------–----------------- • Address ----------------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number ---------------------------------------------------------------- A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is attached, which shall be attested to by the surveyor. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. m (Etty of '*tt1em, '�Nttssar4use##s Planning Pearb Dag X611 'Subm, Aussuchusetts II147II NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM `B" APPLICATIONS See Form `B" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: — -- -- -- - - City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form B, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a tentative approval, by the Planning Board, of a prelim- inary plan filed with this application. The subdivision shown on the plan is tentatively designated as "___--_---_-----------—---—_—----—___ ___________" and is located on streets now and/or tentatively known as ---—--------------------- ---------------- —_____—_______ - ------------------------------------- (insert streets and street or lot numbers) in Ward-------- —-------- Signature of Owner ------_--------------------------_----- -- Street Address City/Town and State ------------------- ----— --— --— — — — — Telephone Number • "It#u ofttlem, ttssttcl� se##s • 9T u FltlttlttYTg PIIFIYb CHU 'Vall Salem, �lassashuseffs 111979 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: ----------------------------------------------- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ------_---------------------------—------------------ ------------------–---------------------------------------------- in Ward ----------------------- -- (insert street and street numbers here) Signature of Owner ------------------ ---–---------------- Street Address ---------- ----------------------—________-- -- -- City/Town&State Telephone Number ----------------------------------------------— – – – ---------- • C tg of tt=l_-e_m, fttss tl�ttsPtts • r��'eumm. 'lYlttlt14t1t� �iOxl'� Titg Aaa �tdem, cffilassaclinseffs Q397D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., --------------------------------------19------- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and statespecific reasons) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ — ------------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Address------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ — — — 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ------------------------------------—__—------—-----—--------—-----—__—-----—______________ Address---- ------ ------—---------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ------------------------------------------------------------------Registry Book ------------------------------------ Page ------------------ ---- 4. Location and Description of Property: ----------------------------------------—--------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ —__--_____________—___ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- ---- ----------------------------------------- • 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner— --------------------------------------------- Address------------------------------------------------------— —--— —-- — Telephone Number -----------------------------— — —— — —— — — �pN.W m fit# nttlem, azssazcixse##s p, c a�4 plarliti !$ DMYd Cahn . �rttl> fir. N June 29, 1967 (Secalb T. Ac(IIarthg Michael 13ashnfuski 34 Qlhacch �$fceef ,Albert P. vifcuff Salem, '{assachnseffs �Ragmsna _ "Sfueeneg Dear Board Member: We have been requested to meet with the City Council in their chambers on Thursday, July 6, at 7 :30 P.M. As this is the first Thursday of the month, it is our regular— ly scheduled meeting night, so instead of conducting our meeting at 34 Church Street, we have been given permission to use the Mayor's office for our meeting which will begin • at 7 :00 P.M. in order that our business may be concluded before we meet with the Councillors. Advertisements to this effect will appear in the News on Friday, and on Wed— nesday of next week. Very truly yours, JMG :cc v J / Chairman l RECE►YED Ctu of 'Sttlerd, Aassar4usetts CITY SALEM,MASS- 0tg ?Hall ,Salem, 'Massachusetts. FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL He one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., -----iTIMP'_-------23-------------------- __19__ 7 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) __________ ---Hecauae---this--is__a_"&-Via3.on_-of-_.land.,__leaving-beth_--14ta__:Lth------------ sufficient frontage and area as required by the zoning regulations, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ------------------------Naumkeag_-Amu aement Co. -------------- Address ---------------------------- 5G__$aehingt4n__Street------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ---------Martex`__A_ToweX'8Engineering Corporation ---------- Address -------------------------------Swampacott, -MassaahWet-to--------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ___EBSeX__SQUth_D strict------------Registry Book----3206------------ Page----_215--------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ------- --- _____ 3__ 1'tOCI__^(�u$rS,__ On$ 1T11C1$_ t.-_and__baV1ng_7.7_ 74__fQ@t__frontage__on_Barton Square_________ -to--be�--removed--from--a-larger---lot-r-having---92,Q00_aq._-_ft_.__.of___ar_ea-------- and-_baving--- uffinS.ent__frontagg__GD_HQx n__Strget1__grombie-Street____ and-BartQn_Square,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAt14AQ AMUSEMENT CO. Signature of Own r ___ __ _ _ ,_ ASUR� TRE • Address -----150_WASHIN(7TON__/S`fRFE/ T---------------/----------- SALEMs MASSACHUSETTS I July 20, 1967 Mr. Auguatine J., Toomey City Clerk, City Hall, Salemo Massachusetts Dear Mr , Toomey; . . ;. At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on July 6, 1967s it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under 'the Subdivision Control Law not Re- quired"on the following described plan 1. Applicant - Naumkeag Amusement Company, 150 Washington Street 2. Location and. description - 13 Barton Square;: redivision of land, ' to be removed' from larger lot fronting on Norman Street,. Crombie Street and Barton Square 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex' South District Registry Book 3206 Page 215 Very truly yours,, MPzcc er July 20s 1967 Mrs Augustine Js Toomey City Clerkq City Halls Salems `Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: , r At a' meeting of the City Planning Hoard held on July 61, 1967s it was VOTED - To- endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the Following described plan is Applicant - D.6metrd-Zareass ,6 March Street • 2, Location .and Description Parcel of land at 6 March Street to .be Divided .ihto 2 lots, "A" and "B" 30 Deed of Property recorded, in Essex South,District Registry Book' 4262 Page 595 Very truly. ' yours$ MPscc Clerk j ECEIVED 11 [ T IIf , asmr4usett8 ss AN '67 lttnnin� Poarb CITSIS LIFFICE ALEM`�MASS. (lite pall 'Julem, .lBlfassachusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., 21--June------------------------- ------19-67- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- ------each_Int--win--ba-left-with__suff_io5,ent__#'_r_anfaF'e---on a-_Iibli0 -my-, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ---------.Demetra-2areas---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address ------------6-xlareh-_Street--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor--- --Edwin_T,--Brv4zyn,ak-i---------------------------------------------------------- Address _2E0_.jafayette__Street------------------------------____-- 3. Deed of property records in —RSSOX_So71#,h_DiatrrirA;___--________--__Registry of Deedu Book__J.2$2----------------- Page------595----------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ----property__i-a-_located-_on--Ma—roh--Stiff;@t---------------------- 00ft_in_from BridReStreet. Lot A x111 have an area of 3920 feet 1 th r ----------------- ----------- — ------------------------------------------------ a2, __PQnx__f7cnntage__sLul__a- depth_of-6g./t5_feet_o_n_the—bridpe_street side. ------- -------- _See_ ttflchmex>t_f9x o £ c m4�slurementss--------- — — — — — �.. r � � Signature of Owner1�--- ---- ---- ---- Address €r I arab-St3°eet 5a1 ;-?IAs9 - - l QEMET•PA 2ilRE/9J - ,� 'RG�iQ�f'rCN ti r JD04eAlMWSS. ✓1 F1967 COWIN � OPUDZYNSKI . w � �./. Dom�e+✓mE✓ ��7 F Po9e I ,- •P. Tarsi/io I G'.A�cnr4s'' ANO 9uR�� '.fie F� y i9 �✓o/�n%/�'sv6 d✓i.twn Mi'9/QG'/� sT. - ' ro/Lo,� d not vir-t .. . _ �rJp �AtEM�9/ViVi6�?A.7G - r � K • a , y r- r L!G *`x f • ' y •.a L � Y t n _ r a - ar r.. 4 a+ i { ae LT J of �TleTtt Ittsstttl�TTse#ts 9�JS�• m✓ � r��r��ypy�.r�y�y�,Mry rtH �} flAfIN£D6 Planning POarb Jahn�. trap, fir. NNN VV ll.. �exalD `({[. �IclQarfhg ,91Nirharl,Vaskaluski 34 Church Atreet ,Albert �l. Vitcaff Aalem, Massachusetts PaumanD �(. Alaeeueg This hearing is scheduled for the same night and the same hour as the regular Planning Board meet- ing. C. Callahan t f.. ®R) of �alem, Gtu Cleat 1�ffite of #I�e ;_y �,19 �uguatine ,i`�. �nnmeu - • GIBC Qilerk 3iunm. l nnn 3 Qi itg�'lnll June 27, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Chairman Planning Board 54 Raymond Road Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sirs The City Council., sitting as a Committee of the Whole, will hold a conference with the Planning Board in the Cotmoil Chamber cn Thursday, July 6, 1967 at 7;30 P.M. :Por the purpose of discussing the amendments to the Building Code and Zoning ordinances as submitted by the Planning Board. Very truly Yors (71 1� AJT/hc A;;�TINE qj TOCME Cm CUM Copy to Mrs. Callahan CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Notice of Chanee of Time The Planning Board will hold its regularly scheduled . meeting in the Mayor's office, City Hall, at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, July 6, 1967, instead of in its usual meeting place, 34 Church Street. June 30, 196 July S, 1967 CITY PLANNING BOARD John Mo Gray, Jr., Chairman W"CITY OF SALEM -PLANNING BOARD BOARD M Nutice of Change of Time The Planning Board will hold its regularly_ scheduled meet-' ing in the Mayor's office, City, Hall, at 7:00 P.M. on Thurs- day, -July 6, 1967, instead of in its usual meeting place, 34 Church Street. CITY PLANNING BOARD By JOHN M. GRAY, JR., Chairman. - June 30; July 5, 1967. • .i a 9T, g (fit#g of �ttlem, �tts�ttr�ixse##s � Planning Pearl Jahn�9. �xttg, fir. Gexnlb T. P&Tartllu - 'Michnel Vnskafaski 34 flihurrh Afreet ,Albert P. Vifcaff �nlem, +�' Inssttrhusetfs �ittgmanD �. obfaeeneg . July 7► 1967 To The Honorable city Council Louis A. Sariniuch » President All Councilors Jelly 12i, 11967 Re 'coning Amendments Gentlemena At the conference held on the e+veni#g of: July 6, 19671 some of the Councilors felt that consideration should be given to further amend the proposed softag ordinance amendment to ailowaor the storage of non•:commereial "vacation.type" trailers on the owners premises* The Planning Hoard concurs that this Use of an owners would not be objectionable and would therefor recc mend that the • following additional amendment be included with the proposed amend4- mems to Chapter 35x t Chapter 35 « (Pg* 32) 4 Section VII y .Paragraph A# Ulets »* Add a new third subparagraph as followst 11% m So;called "Camping" or "vacation" trailers$ tot over twentypfive (25) feel long, registered in the name of the owner of residential premises ray be stored on the premisesi provided that duraineg such storage periods the trailer shall. not be used as living. quartere nor shall the trailer be connected to public watetgr.sanitary serer or other public Utilities# No more than one (1) such trailer may be stored on a lot, The provisions of the density' regulations as . listed in Table Y of Section V11tof this Chapter 33 shall be adhered to, In any event# no trailer shall be st&ed in the front bard of said premises A special permit for this purpose xvAst be obtained from the Inspector of 5taiWings before the land can be occupied." • CfU of �$alrra, fflttssar4usrtts Planning Poarb 364n ,A. Grap, me- Gera1D T. '0611arthg Oichael Vaskofuski 34 ((Tllurrh Street ,Albert A. Witraff ,Salem, �9fiassarhusetto �l2agmsna . "15fuemeg 2 If approved by the CoMeils this amendment should be inserted at the bottom of page 4, after the last notes of the revised recommendations .telivered to you previously. very truly yourso • Chaim Salem RGUnj Board Copies: All Couns lois City Clerk • i :�_� TO rt+E ,J�7vu o.2�lBCC `. Irr' cauiiC.1C. 7 / / Gar�Cmtu, /dr c NGCn .o1„ rNC _ IEvZN/uG bF YUGY C / 7C2/ So /ht OP TAC jCbv ,y.CI RS - FG Lr. Ta9r Co /✓ r/DER.+r/oti fi,/OOLP FuRr4EK J' 'P2o/� � r� 13t C1uLv rld14A/y, r,ao TV < y Zouii. G .. 0rto /4�-441CC A /hGAlJtvr To /4 CC 0 15 r- oz: TNI 57,0 Rx c GF Noy Cunrrh272G/nG 1/4C4,-16N -.7-ypt TiZ�J�G �Qr . o/, r/v aCv /Jt ? 5 j� �rCr„ sf.S. �"+C / L) A V/aC /Junco GGN �VZf T/+Ar 7 /✓+ S Ufa OF A4 O/RJNLQS WaV (c� IRlor 3C ofv'Ccr/ o/d,aa'CG A/iD 4.) 6o Y-.Vea 1ZC � 6r),MCfiD r4Ar TNL j- OLG0ki /A, C i4OD/ 7'/ 04144, A/Y, tt vn,Lvr �t A/C 16, pr- J t,.) / ra ruC /Pz0 4,,;2CNpmCV Ta Cc/ d � rce �. C//ATt 2 YCC r/ati ZA /G iRf -- ,4 0 D A A740 .� 20 tv/�j �Z�iG,PAJ'k AS 'OF u6Got,.AS CAGGGO CAn,/;/A/C PA C.4r/64v re14/GCRS+ 1ver Ovt: R r(,Jt:u ry FF-t_r o,t1C/ �' EC/ f%< ecn /+r rv� :vinic Or- a w Faw vC/7 GF Z6s,1p Ea r/1C FzC,/lllrr Al fra-lZCO 0 d rkC /.,>/t en, + sGt/ PCO V/oco r14Ar 0UR +NC SdC1d STaRaCC � G>Z1(9oC 7"1✓E rK4 /G/ER fHAtc t/ or et. vfLo AS G /v++dC 4u.4zre- ZS' /VoR SAait7-SP-4 / Lf-Q 13C CoNN4Cr4q puBc/ C tJ�( 1'CR/ SkV /rARy SCGJCe 0R aruotR %o +/ qt / C vr1G /riE1r, ✓ 0 A40kc r#4N ONE (/> fUC/,l - 7- VA /G GQ MAY Be- -A E-A Lor THE _P2or'/S/ ovr o> f I 7T-''HE nFENS /rY er-CuL4rrO%, 5, AS L/ SrEO Ia / A 3j P- of SCr/ON _ox roar I C� r E K �S SeY�G G Rf ADN CSC o rp Al .4.uX cv`ar No rggiGG,? 5744ce. -roRCA iu .raf Fk>oNr %1A 90 O,- 504 /o ,r /V rE.r. fr sPCCIA pCi?Mir Foe rMIS I )� URp n SG . .M-ur,- /3E FcZ a/Yi i W C. _ :.:i. �Nc� �tero2 BF � � «4/uCS /P�f� CC iNE- . I; u l. 4Ivo C o ,/ Esc So OCCup ' co, W v C1/A �eMAy JAICM / L4Nt✓ r.u6 v�fl2q I Cllr Y 1, e- e.Iz< 4 1F Alolpzovcv gy T/iC CoL)A/ C IL i T1l�S QrnE/eon -t /e r' fNOUL0 8f 1!uScgi-co Ar rVt ed rro tvi &F IPA C C AF rC2 1'�G C�i rr A/-o riC of raE eCv1sEo C'EGarh Mt�DA r9 � r/ s bEe eu£2Ea FO yov ? ,eeviaus1- v . i i i M E Y, A-h P4 Vo iti.0 �o u A/CCE lvirH 4 1 . I Aa �, oK�. ciu.�c °� A L �ErrE�? /ZEc< 1 /vG Arncaomcvrr r 36- / ,iJIE ✓/ictni, r o ,,//NC �20 i � 44C,U, FiS raE /0c ii uti.NG �a ec Frcclzcr4Rr it O✓r Y4C4ri6,L,✓ / .i1rr� 41k1'BCAL To. RaVIP C. S0FFr C✓ fNr Cod / Gr of 74t c e rrgr? i . ,,Coe O! V7 ;Lleur✓o4 r4) ACC . r{(-C.. _ c U4C�L a i Am r*4cei: a 'Tugf�rCaP ,fu, gC . Mane of - SA�o . CfrrE� A/✓o To A4 T/rf CuuvC1G6rd>- I.i/I,r 7'ke/K c1Exr RfCuG, ,? M [Grir-lG. � �Nq �RM �iw - JicGCn, ��n,�,4iuG �Onitp i l _ i { E i i 1., ' S$ak n, '�Rttssar4usttts P aktiting Pourb To4tt M. (brag, Mr. Geralb Z. ffld larft Aic4ael Paskofnski 34 (94urr4 Street ,Albert F. Vitroff Salem, ' fassarhusetts �RagmonD �(. '66foeenell July 13,; 1967 Mr. A, Js. Toomey City Clerk i, Salem# Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: I am handing you herewith an "Original" of a letter relative amendients to Chapter 350 The Salem Zoning Ordinance. • As the Planning Board secretary is on vacation, I am unable to provide st, iciont caPies of the letter for distri• bution to all the Councilors.. I further request that copies be made at' said letter aua given to all the Councilors at their nest regular meeting* Very truly youxst Chairman - Salem Planning Board ` a f 101-11i#u of �$alem, assar4usetts �'�� �lrxnxttn$ �uttr� 34C4=4 ,S}rert 'Saran, Massachusetts July 13, 1967 City Clerk City Council Salem# Massachusetts Gentlemen: Attached herewith are copies of questionaires received from the Metropolitan Area Planning Council and the Planning Boards answer to same. We are submitting this as further evidence that all local codes and ordinances must be continually updated if • the city is to be eligible for Federal or State Funds. Very truly your$, Chairman « Salem Planning Board ` I CtU u afem gassarhusrtts STs r V Planning Pvard 3ahn 0. drag, 3r. Geralb T. ffldlarft gichnel paskofuski 34 @Illurrh Atreet ,Albert�R. Vitcaff Anlem, fflaoear4uzrttz �Ragmnna�(. �fneeneq July 13, 1967 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Metropolitan Area Planning Council 44 School Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Attention: Mr. Joseph P. Dupont Planning Section Dear Mr, Dupont- In amply to your June 1z 1967 questionaire, which I d=-d not receive until today, I submit the following: • 1. The 1963 Master Plan of Salem is the one of current use. However, we are now working onrplans to update this pian in 1968. 2. The 1965 Zoning Ordinance and Map at the present time are being amended. On May 31, 19670 the Planning Board held a public hearing on proposed Zoning amend- ments* On June 20, 1967, our recommendations were sent to the City Council. On July % 1967, the Planning Board and the Council held a conference to discuss the Zoning amendment, together with proposed amendments to the Building Code, The Council meets tonight, at which time we hoprthe set a date for their own public hearing The Planning Board hopes therefore, that vie can send you an updated Zoning Ordinance and Map sometime in September 1967. Very truly yours, Chairman - Salem Planning Board Copiest City Clerk Salem City Council July 27, 1967 Nr. Morton Braun, Planning Services Group, 1$ Eliot Street, Cambridge$ Mass, Dear Mro Braun: Would you .kindly pick up and send down as soon as possible, ten or twelve';copies of each of the .following- - Annotated additions per- pared by the Department of Commerce for Chapters 40-P., 4.0-Bb and 40-Cp ' for Zoning, Historical Studies, and Planning Procedures. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman 1 'i �: li i July 28, 1967 IN Mrs Richard Matton, 15' Puritan Road, Beverly, Mass. Dear Mr. Matton: On Tuesday, July 20, 19671, the Planning Board voted to deny ,approval ofiyour application for permidsion. to extend the sewerage on Day. Avenue for .reasons listed in City Engineer Mitchells letter of ,May .26, a copy .of which is enclosed together .with profiles. The Board suggests that your engineer confer with Mr.' ,Mitchell and answer ALL this criticisms, after which you may then file a new 'application for approval-. Very ,truly ,yours• JMG:cc Encle Letter from City Engineer Chairman 2 Profiles -- --------� Sr/c!? /N -- L_c o R — T— --Lf-C—�e�_a_t_tiz__sus'-GE_f_1_'S- __—�`��r- --�✓' �-- '�Q _ >.�__G _ /r_N_f 6✓ �!;_�4_C-_�a i S --�l�,� r � �.E_Sr_h_S_/_ . _ A F r C /? T._G.iZ_l,.11,!1 C t,% _-__- -- —y��- nt--T[�L /✓ _ !� G_—_ /_.__A/ 2 W_ AP/AL.' fsr __ _ - --- -- - _-=-1 -- --- -- ---- --- _ - -- -- -� - --- -I c�tra, (gttg of "itt[enz, 'Mttssar4usetts • T� g Pepnrtment of ?public Forks NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER - July 10,1967. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re: Day Avenue . Gentlemen: Mr. Richard Matton informs me that you have not received my reply to your letter dated May 22,1967. My reply was written and, together with Mr. Matton' s letter and plan, deposited in the City Messenger' s office for mailing on May 26,1967 . I have no knowledge of what happened to it after that. I am enclosing a copy of Mr. Matton' s plan, as modified by me, together with a copy of my original leiter of reply. I will deposit this in a mail box to make sure it reaches you. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer Encl: Copy of modified plan. Copy of original letter • Ctv of 'Stt1em, 'Gttssarhuse#ts • �T, ! - Pepsrt hent of FuMir Parks tr�c� NEAL S. MITCHELL CITY ENOIN[RR May 26,1967 Planning Board 31+ Church Street Salem, Mass, Re: Day Avenue. Gentlemen: Please be advised that a profile of a, road should extend the entire length of the proposed road, and not just a portion remote from any approved street. I have modified the plan to show such a proposed profile which? I believe gives a good grade for the length of the road in question and does the least damage to any of the abutters. However, construc- tion to this grade will effect most of the abutters, so their approval should be obtained . Full construction of the road (including sidewalks) will necessi- tate changes, at the front of their lots, by most of the abutters. It would also require "slope easements" on land of the State College , land of Ryan and land of Melanson, as shown on the modified plan. Very truly yours , �&4 l Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer Encl: Plan original letter Richard A. Matton 15 Puritan Road Beverly , Mass . (owner ) �Yn 567 May 4 , 1967 (/ Planning Board of Salem Gentlemen: I would like your permission to extend the sewerage on Day Avenue from Lot "M" to Lot "L" as shown on I the enclosed profile. Mr. Mitchel.' has seen the enclosed profile and suuszested I submit it to the board for approval. This board has already approved the extension of the water line from Day Avenue to Lots "M&,L" . i� Sincerely , Richard A. Matton ('gi#g of Salem, jeassar4usetts �laxmin$ �uxrD Sohn!a- May 22, 1967 Goss"& 4Y 34 94mh ffit"d Ate , AumtA-Vauff Mr. Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Mitchell: Enclosed is a communication which we have received from Richard Matton, 15 Puritan Road, Beverly, requesting ap- proval of the enclosedprofile rofile of Defy Avenue, dated May 3 1967. We would appreciate your advice as to whether your re- quirements are complied with on this plan, and any com- ments you may wish to add. When you do so, we will ap- preciate your returning the enclosed letter and the pro- file to this Board. Very truly yours, MP:cc IJ � Acting a rman Encl. 2 Richard A. Matton 15 Pa 15 Puritan Road Beveriz �,,�r, Mass. / (Owner) �yyj vi7 6 .7 may G' May 49 1967 Plenning Board of Salem (Gentlemen: I would like your permission to oxtend the sewerage on Day Avenue from Lot "M" to Lot "L" as shown on the enclosed profile. Mr. Mitchel ' has seen the . enclosed profile end suacested I submit it to the board for approval. This board has already approved the extension of the water line from Day Avenue to Lots "M&L". Sincerely-, RichArd A. Matton } • July 28, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey,, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning- Board held on July 20, 1967, it was . VOTED: - NOT to endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan. ' 1.,,.. Applicant - Lillian M. Francoeur, 24 Osborne Street 2, Location and Description - Lots #108 and #109 Belleview Street shown on plan 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book P1, Bk. 12 Page Pl. 27 Very truly yours, MPscc Clerk July 28, 1967 t Mrs. Lillian M. Francoeur, 24 Osborne Street, Salem, sa. Dear Mrs, Francoeur:, On Thursday, July 20, 1967, the Planning Boardwoted to deny without prejudice, your application for endorsement of the. plan of ` land shown as Lots 108 and 109 on Belleview Street., The reason for the denial is that there was insufficient evidence that there Was a clear title and if there was a clear title no date of transfer was given. The Board suggests that you. retain a lawyer to obtain this in- formation and that he also check Section VIZI of the .Salem Zoning Ordinance (Noncomformity) to ascertain which provision of the Ord- mance is being referred to., Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman Enclosed: - Plan of Land �EA SE "N RUlr— R ® BOOPUaVl & PEASE " �h�ft" w rG o -- ro _ D!EvS- W Irwav r -25..x/ `—'C- ---- — -----�2G he._ a f__ � ��t�'_D__—�S/✓u t,�_b!�+ _/y�_ G vTS._ / U_8 R,ea / C� �a ,� HS--P.-G9 i_dw__ v C—Tu-t_ /�[ v • (•_c C�C4jf!-�fU� oCNtG ._t4�� r — -- --r�!.C__✓2�C._—�I_A.[—�--C_L6/�?_ Z'< I'L_C--/I ti'-n---/ f _lbCig�_�_f_ _ - --A— C4.Z.AR_ _��r�rG .__—_<✓o D � Tc old__ _T_�22��r� _4!./«--�e �cr,_.—. S 0!r_ CGM_� O_i' C_t _b-----G-K ° -C�— � �i ! _ , y,.a� � x � 't, l k � �t )+�,'• AS,t 11 � F t . r� a ;, "i y h3 .>is yfite'1 a t ; r fM1'. , a l t M1 t A,,;E ✓' • yam r±... - ar�x„z. Ht i • �..� �i�°�'..,.Y ritn`"yiq� - L (situ of �zlezn, C�zssttc �zsP#ts 10 `` � "� 67 �1ttnxlixm� �nttr� CITY CLERK'S ,OFFICE SALEW MASS. 34 (94urch *rut S FORMA m ale , ,assacE�usefis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., -----------------------J(7LY__2Qi----------19.67___ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ______- --------------------—------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant -----=----- LILLIAN_It1. FRANCOEUR ---------------------------------------------------- Address --------------------24--OSB0RNE__ST.___SALFA%___MASB.------------------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor --------------_ROBER'i---B.__B-0-W l---_-_--_ESSEX--SURVEY_-_SERV_ICE Address ---------------- 7$ CABOT__$T. BEVERLYMASS •___ y �;«...... - rx`4�'C]t`�"'t""'`•*"""U"”` k'•!! 1^.V,!'�'�k4`.'i.y�'nr`iw.�.+ 4r ��y rt,* .kkL "FyrrgT� nt 'iy.:f ay ,.1, d ♦ 7 � F 'M1:r ytt �. :N SAT' �l i ! E'"♦ f Cly- y� }N c T i k rR/!.t at'.s'� v.2 _. B"0n. - 3..,_Deed'of property records m 'aSEX+C41INT7C____ --------------Registry Book _Pl_•---Bk.___12-- Page ----.----P1.--22---- 4. Location and Description of Property: Lots 1-0-8--and-_1- 09 Bel leview Street - - --- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Salem, Massachusetts (SEE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) -------------------------------- Signature of OwnerdlYl ,� — -- ---- Address ---------------- -- Address ---------------------- -----6kY4_ L�-- R3�r � 91,e.� 3 1��i'��i•, r '.�i�§��t t�'" G � �T�Tt a� _ . „} + �-.t ,J i3 �y. ,y .� 1 Val t a� 300 . YM • k t 4r+r e .S .,.r► 1rr�.`tf'r!'YY. 9 »,. h �a..3•;r ' + '. ,`f 3"� v d - _allen shown an s -Ic/a--on-�t-'ppltn-Ot' 3t1• - in-Sa3: ` ..<'• f . entitled 'Pierpont Park Salem, Vaseschusetts, August, 1899, owned by William J. Coughlin, Jo vcor ed in Ease: SouthKIP i !isgistry of Deeds, Plan Book 12 Plan No. 27 more particularly bounded l' and describ*d as follows : Northeasterly by lot 107 on said plan 100 feet , Southeasterly by Belleview Street 50 feet Southwesterly by lot 110 on said plan 100 feet Northwesterly by lot 105 on said plan 50 feet y _ Containing 5,000' square feet. k Being the same promisee conveyed to Demerise Y. Chalifour, ,the mother of Lillian Y. Francoeur by deed doted July 19, 1904, and All recorded with said deeds, Book '1756 Page 851.For title of Lillian 3 V. Francoonr see Fsse: Probefo rlenurise V. Cbkli four No. 169425,t/- r -� b.•+ it 7. July 2$, 1967 Charles G. Cowan Associates, 847 North Main Street} Providence, Rhode Island Gentlemen: Re-Proofreading New Subdivision Rules I have proofread the typed pages of the new City of Salem Subdivision Rules. They are o.k., therefore please complete all of the work on this project as originally directed as soon as possible.' Very truly yours, ., . J9G:cc firman I w - -- --- - --- -- -- --IM60--'5 -A� -- i ------ ------ -- - v =- 77--/--- ---- -------- ---- - -------- - l,_.. ,4 �i I'--- ---- ------ --�-----= -- - -- - ---•------ I e CRY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS t MAYOR'S OFFICE, CITY HALL F RLINCIS x COWNS,MAYOR K THOMAS M GRIFRN i�awNa�4 r July 31, 1967 Department Heads City of Salem . . Salem, Massachusetts !'yet• Dear Sirs: Ri. Information for the renewal of the Workable Program will �� 4V� 7 1 � "3 'N y be required from your department. Please cooperate with the Planning x1Z,�M.. Services Group which will be preparing this document. Sineerely yours, , too • f.. FRANCIS X. COLUNS, F +` MAYOR :Iw FXC/ah Building Department Plumbing Department Health Department [h �$ City Electrician Fire Department / A Planning Board r/ Board of Appeals City Auditor Housing Authority Citizens Advisory Committee I • RELEASE The Planning Board of the City of Salem does hereby release in full Lots 147 and 148 as shown on plan recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds, Plan Book 109, Plan 12 from the force and effect of the conditions set forth in the Protective Covenant dated May 19, 1967 and recorded in said Registry of Deeds, Book 5444, Page 274. • CHAIRMAN COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Essex, ss. August `3 1967 Then personally appeared the above named and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be the free act and deed of the City of Salem Planning Board, before me NOTARY PUBLIC Mail Address: MASSACHUSETTS FEDERATION P. O. Box 31 O F' PLANNING BOARDS - Braintree, Mass., 02184 BOARD OF DIRECTORS fi'y FROM: LEGISLATIVE CO-CHAIRMEN President + COL. FRANK J. CASSIDY 865Main Rd., Westport TO: ALL PLANNING BOARDS Vice President + FELIX JULIANI 6 Sylvester Ter., Wellesley 15 August, 1967 Vice President +THOMAS J. STOCK ETT Dear Fellow Planner: 110 Newhall St., Lynn Vice President -HAROLD T. KING House 5092 is a bill now before the Legislature. Its purpose 50 Ballardvale Rd., Andover is supposedly to authorize Regional Planning Districts to act Treasurer as Economic Development Districts within the meaning of the * BURTON C. PARKER P g 821 Pearce Rd., Swansea Federal Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965. Legislative Co-Chairman ------ SecretaryThe bill in fact does the following: . JOSEPH M. MAGALDI 9: 65 Wayne Ave., S. Braintree Ex-Officio 1. Creates another type of district called a Regional * FREDERICK A. FALLON Planning and Economic Development District. Dir. of Planning Dept. of C. & D. 150 Causeway St„ Boston 2, Makes membership of all cities and towns in such a Legislative Co-Chairman * ALFRED EDWARDS district mandatory. 123 North Main St. Fall River, Mass, 3. Authorizes the Commissioner of Commerce and Development erectors of Large to dissolve existing, operating Planning Districts in RTHUR C. COLVIN, Lunen burg AMES J. MATERA, Oakdale Economic Development Areas. * EDWARD A. POSKUS, Brockton WILLIAM F. WHITE, Weymouth GEORGE BAILEY, Sharon 4. Requires an executive committee which in fact is MRS. CLAIRE NEWMANS, So. Hadley authorized to transact the business of the district, Area Directors Area No. 1 reducing the district commission to a nullity. (OPEN) Are. No. 2 5. Sets a maximum charge of 30 cents per capita for local WALTER IWANICKI 70 Dewey St. communities share of district costs (this may be Chicopee Falls, Mass. reduced to 15 cents. Area No. 3 HERBERT WENTWORTH 627 Pleasant $t., Paxton These are the major objectionable features of the bill but there A,.. No. 4 are also many other details included that should be left to HAROLD T. KING local determination and locally adopted by-laws. 50 Ballardvale Rd., Andover . Area No. 5A *JAMES R. MICELI This bill, in its present form is decidedly objectionable and Webber St., Wilmington should be opposed. We see no probability that the bill will Area No. 5B be sufficiently improved to be acceptable in the short: time ROBERT L. ALLEN Codman Rd., Lincoln left in this session of the Legislature. We therefore urge Area No. 5C you to write, phone, or see your Representative and Senator .JOHN M. DJR, Main St., Doverover and urge them to oppose House 5092. Area No. 6 COL: FRANK J. CASSIDY Very truly yours, 865 Main Rd., Westport Area No. 7 CLARENCE E. DOUGHTY LEGISLATIVE CO-CHAIRMEN Be. 53, Eastham .a No. 8 (OPEN) Immediate Past President Alfred Edwards W. A. ELLISTON, M. D. 263 South Ave., Weston Joseph Magaldi *Executive Committee f��tn of "�4u1em ��a �ttr. ix�e#ts ��t a �IMttItlll� �IIMT�1 August 23, 1967 John M, Gray, Jr. CITY HALL Gerald T. McCarthy Micheal Pukowski SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Albert R. PitcoR Raymond F. Sweeney - Dear The Planning Board of the City of Salem wishes to record its opposi— tion to House Bill No. 5092. In addition to the objections listed in the bulletin from the Massa— chusetts Federation of Planning Boards, a copy of which is enclosed, our •Board feels that Salem has many local unique problems that we can better judge at a local. level, rather than creating a newtype of Regional Plan— ning and Economic Development District. Therefore, when this bill appears before you, we respectfully request that you record your opposition to House Bill No. 5092. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman Copy to: Alfred Edwards, 123 No. Main Street , Fall River, Mass. • hpr-��s — — — — — ------ ---- - -- �j - --- —. S�ti c N .—`T+YIJ"+iZZ'iY`b��IJ1 a'�n.� �y�.�.��n���-v-�Go 9 Y k ?5?!n/.`"-- •— 7 V�j dui S bf�--cov7 j 2i y i7 po+13'�l? Q7 J3�'/% � 1 fyo��/ Nv1 + �� n �r1.L �/— rl1 f>7/1�— 10• 7iYi1'? v/J—• 7 02 el _.. "q&3/ 'N�Lj 7��1D P/ 57/c�p r7 �j � r 1 August 25, 1967 Nr, Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, .Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on August 30 19679 it was VOTED — To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law .Not Required" on the following described plan 1. Applicant — Anastasia Kozicki, also known as Stacia Kozicki, Frances Schevis and Stphen Schevis, 65 Dearborn Street, Salem 2. Location and Description - Two lots of land►I one being Lot #1 on Larch Avenue; the other Lot �2, being 65 Dearborn Street 3. Deed of Property Recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 3748 Page 101 Very truly yours, MP:cc _ . er s► m RECEIVED (gitV o ` IEItt� ix���CC 11SE S JUL H 8 37 AN '67 1kanning n rd CITY CLEkN'S OFFICE ALEW MASS. CHC Pull ,*alem, glassur4usetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., July 26, 7 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) _________ — ----------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • Anastasia Kozicki, also known as Stacia Kozicki, Frances Schevis and I. Name of Apphcan@-- - ---•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $fie ften Sc, evis Address ________�—�earb_rn-Street,_Salem,__Essex_County, Massachusetts_________________________ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ___Edwin T. Brudzynski -------- --------- Address -------26D Lafayette Street, Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts -- ---------------------------------- 3. Deed of property recordEssex South District sin -----------.------------------------------------------------Registry Book...37413----------------- Page-- 101------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: Two lots located at 65 Dearborn Street and the other PP Y --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- located at Larch Avenue, Salem, Essex County,Massachusetts -------------------- LOT 1 containing 10,930 square feet of land located at :Latch Avenue:. .: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L,Q;T 2 contQ;r,luy 16,597 square feet of land located at 65 bearoorrr Areei -------- ----------------------------------------------------------- - -------- -------- Signature of Owner __ ______ __ , b5 Dearborn Street, Salem, Massachusetts Address --- - - - -------------------------------- �frF MT4 " U d J 4t 4t ryv Y Zan p o/ +r s r 'Y ' w � pA '�SlSI �L 77 y7 ano'' s� vr6 �NPws ' � D i f» A `4"''P .�,,,d drrfsicYi �5 yi5t 8 � �t# x '7� `r+� J �'�1 ����1•.<m �'°. J r. J n , t ��z i August 10; 1967 Mr, Augustine J: Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr.' Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on August 3, 19679 it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described plan • 1. Applicant - Elwin E and Evelyn M Rebidue, 16 Appleby Road, Salem 2,` Location and Description -1394 square feet of land at 16 Appleby Road to be conveyed to applicant by owners of lot 61$ which includes this parcel 3., Deed of Property Recorded in Essex South District Registry Book Page Very truly yours ' MP:cc Clerk `f REC �� , i. Ctu IIttlPttt, 21Ssttc�lisP##s va rq 2l 2 � �[ttnnirl� �attr� CITY Clt'�'S"S OFFICE SALEM. MASS: piitq Pall 'Salew, 'Massachusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL s File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section 11-B. Salem, Mass., — July 27-9'--------- --19 -6-'- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. 11-A) _-__--_-_--- the lots are situated on a public way_ and conform_to--- the zoning------ ordinance as to frontage, area'and setbacks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ----------2lwin_E. and Evelyn M. Rebidue Address --- 16 Appleby Road, Salem, Mass. --— - - —------------------------------------ ----------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Edwin T. Brudzynski -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- , , . Address --------------------------260-------Lafayette StreetSalemMass -- ------------------------------- II Essex South District 3. Deed of property records in _-_-__—_--_---_.-_-__-__-------_____-_-_-----_--__-----__Registry Book------------------------- Page---------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: --.._16 Appleby__Road,_ Salem,__Mass. ---------------- Area designated as 1394--- square feet- ---is- to be conveyed to - - ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. and Mrs. Rebidue (lot 621) by owners of lot 618, the area of --------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - -- 1394 square feet now being part of lot 618. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Elwin E. & Evelyn M. Rebidue By their AttVat Signature of Owner -__ _ � 1�� — ---------------- Francis B.Address __10_ Chestnut-_Street,_ --I-_Mass,_ • 1. August' 11, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk,. City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey; At `a meeting of the City Planning Board, ,held on August 3, 19670 it was VOTED -,`To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re-, quired" on the following described plan 1. Applicant - Raymond L. Cummings, Trustee Loring Realty Trust, S70 Washington' Street, Salem, Mass. 2'. Location and Description - 81.0 Acres situaged on and off north- westerly side of Loring Avenue, between land conveyed by Charles A, Currier, et al, Trustees, to one Diane Lebel, 3. Deed of Property. Recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 2694 Page 321 Y Very truly yours, MPscc er MCSWEENEY, CUMMINGS & DONAGHUE WILLIAMH.MCSWEENEY COUNSELLORS AT LAW 1800-1994 - ' MORGAN J.MC SWEENEY 70 WASHINGTON STREET IBOI-IB36 RAYMOND L.CUMMINGS -SALEM, MASS. HAROLD R.DONAGHUE July 27, 1967 Salem Planning Board Care of The City Clerk City Hall Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Gentlemen: In accordance with the provisions of Section II B, cof the Rules and Regulations Governing Subdivision of Land in Salem, Massachusetts, I herewith submit a plan of land in the • City labeled "Plan of Land in Salem Property of Loring Realty Trust July 20, 1967 Essex Survey Service 275 Cabot Street, Beverly", together with an application, Form A,setting forth the location and description of the property, and respect- fully request a determination and an endorsement on said plan "Approval under the subdivision control law not required under Chapter 41 G. L., Sec, 81P," Very truly yours, RLC:p /Tr)fstee of the Goring Realty Trust Enclosures REGISTERED MAIL • July 27, , 1967 _ City Clerk City Hall e Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: �{ I hand you,tierewith',two�copieseof an application, .Fora r • A, submitted by me ,this day, as Trustee,"of the Lori;ig Realty Trust, to the Planning Board tt S city of .Sileu yegnest-. ' , ,` - r , ing a determination and an endorsement on a plan au'ba_ i.tted ;. with said application that approval under the subdivision D control lap not' regnired,_ Said,plan' is' labeled "Plan'' of Land in Sal" Property of Loring Realty Trust July 20, 1967. Essex Survey Service 275 Cabot Street, Beverly"; The owner of the land is Raymond L. Cummings, Trustee ,. of the Lorng `Realty Trust; The address of the owner is _ 70 Washington Street, Salem, ,,Massachusetta. Very truly yours� ' •t, • r RLC:p F Trydstee of the' La��gRealty Trust.` Enc'1, u Qom` 21 10 32 AR V 111anning Pondr CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SAW4, MASS. lditg Pall '$alem, Massachusetts, FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., --------tuly--2-7-------—--------------—---1967---- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) _the___ only---ltat-_xi.thin--the-_traot-so-div_ided_has_frontage_on__a_public_way_ _________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant __Baymond__L,___CuM_Mi tgs,_-as__he__is__Trustee_-of_the-Loring-Realty Trust Address 7.9_Waeh�[ngton_St reet_,__Sa lem1_MassaChusetts 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor---FYar1k__C,_-Hancock--------------- - - --------------------------------------------------- Address _27.5_Cabot__4treet}--$ev_er1Y,_Mase.-------------------------- 3. Deedgf property records in _ seex_ th_Qfsts3ct__________________Registryof Deeds, 87 Book----645---------------Page----25-------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: d__g4e1__41__und2_v__aI5e4(__lad__�52DY3�ing_8 _,0- atres.-situatad__or>_-and-_szfE__tlxe_lYQrShteeatexly__nisie__o£_LQring_Ayenue__be_te¢een_lani convey_ed_by__ Charles AA__Currier,__et__al,__2rustees_,_ to_oneDiannc_ Lef3elt__bydeed; da.t_ed-_Se:atembet_-1,--.1926;__xeCArde4-etith__sa1_d__dseds,_-Rook--2494.,._-Pbge--3�l,.y find th-a-div ding--.line-_between__tl>.e---citX--Qf-_Salem__endT482ra4_fSwampseott--------------- Signature of Owner ________ vs '�sustee as aforesa4 • Address 70_Warh3ngtan_-Street_,___Salem,_Massachuaetta S • August 11, 1967 Mri Augustine J Toomey, City Clerk, CityHall, "Salemx Massachusetts Deir'Mr* Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on August 3, 1967, it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described plan , l'. Applicant - Henry G. Boucher, 11 Fairfield Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description - Formerly Lots 1, ' 2, 3, and 4 at the cor- ner of Adams Street and Madison Road, to become Lots A and Be ,3. Deed of Property Recorded in Essex South District Registry Plan Book 16 Plan 16 ' Very truly yours, 4:cc ler J 3 FORM A RECEIVED • APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT Auc 3 223 PH OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVtWy CLERK'$ OFFICE SALEM, MASS. ' Salem, Mass. , August 3, 1967 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivison Control Law because ( see Sect . II-A) it purports to change the size of Lots previously shown on a recorded plan. Approval by the Board of Appeals on Petitioner' s application for variance from the zoning ordinance is attached hereto and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant : Henry G. Boucher Address: 11 Fairfield Street , Salem, Massachusetts 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor: Edwin T. Brudzynski Address: 260 Lafayette Street , 'Salem, Massachusetts • 3. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry Book Page 4. Location and Description of Property: Formerly Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, corner of Adams Street and Madison Road as shown on Subdivision Plan of Pickman Park recorded in Plan Book 16, Plan 16. Henry G. Boucher By his Attorney, GEOR E P. VALLIS Address : 70 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts 40 of �$xlem, Ma9sar*Ptt9 P"rb of Mad June 1, 1967 JAMKS N. •0WbKRDECISION ON Petition of Henry Boucher to erect a single family 'O". '. O"" . dwelling at the corner of Adams Street and Madison Road. jo" r. ...r. a. ..rau.u."oou. The Inspector of Buildings refused to issue a permit to allow the construc- tion of a single family dwelling at this location as this is an Industrial district, and petitioner can not meet the City of Salem Zoning requirements for this district. Counsellor George P. Vallis appealed to the Board for the petitioner, and a hearing was held on this petition on May 22, 1967, pursuant to notice$ mai3,od postpaid to the petitioner, his attorney, abutters, board members, and others, and notices published in the Evening News. Petitioner's appeal stated that the area in question had been recently zoned for 1Industrial use but there exist in the immediate area numerous single and two family dwelling houses. All board members excepting Chairman John M. Gray, Sr. , were present at this hearing. Counsellor Vallis appeared and stated the construction of this dwelling would not derogate from the intent and purpose of the Ordiu- • ante . Councillor Perron appeared in favor. No one appeared in opposition. After due consideration thereof, the Board voted unanimously to grant this appeal. BOARD OF APPEAL APPEAL GRANTED BY Secreta "' P *, a',Rd t ,�^ r: , d¢�N " �gL- 'g v *.` ett xa ..nyrt ,' fa ' 'tom '. ' v r a ay�•:.. j } .•mss �. x a#:.� '_ ^ir Sfi"_.3 .? 4# r+'' kx ��!•.r'�i' i`Si .�S ! q�."`•�,ah 'XX.�As,Fr �8+� t?0.* �r r _.•.g . .. , f *n, i, r c ` ta. � `t+fw_F a .P.i S?a.ray^ dt - 44 r �7� a7r r��' '1 ..Y t i'� �•�c � �• T � 1.r.. �'- �, rI S a � x � � 4) v n' 91 � ^1 K. .+..��i r ; r•' 1� r� � .f: �Y'v.,d yi•;�' 4 L'�� 55 y��� f� >pF � 'x � -. iv " 1 i � rXiiRlt � y w a t zt°N w t � L�a f Y' ��k f.'xb �r s'"`a� , ?Y� 'z"°9 � _ \• 4. N, i - 9 71, Nk K` ry .., tai s :I,z+F a s :; s•. .y. ' r. . i� ,5t'c'+i.d�.t�• ;[z+"�, 6# � ; �'.��w .r� �t ��F�a'+f�''�� „! v7 ? ;z„f 4 tT� 14 -�el - .b - gc a `�'- "�r ''mss,« f�.] , Sm �. • ' �. ' y�L'!v¢ n kb VV 'x f�`N a t' tt •'l e� R iia ,�, t T ,�, w . 12 '�- ",Eye` � �• `s " ylt r•u� `tS� ^' - - ' August 110 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall,i Salem, Massachusetts ,Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on August 3, 19670 it was ,VOTED - To endorse 'Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on ;the following described plan ;1. Applicant - Nauitkeag Amusement Company, 150 Washington Street,. Salem • 2. Location and, Description, ,- Norman and Crombie Streets, one lot to have 141.39 foot' frontage on Crombie Street, the other to have 192 .foot, frontage on Norman Street 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 3206 Page 215 Very truly yours, MPtcc Clerk Ctg of '*tt1em, 'fflttssa ft plau h% pankc 3 3 21 PH '67 CITYfICE. SALE14.14ASS aitg pall 9aleca, ,[sssaztiusetts FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass.> ----------------August-2i--- ------------19.67--- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ------------ the__existing_l.ot_-i.s---ta_be_da.Y.i.iec l_into--two--Parcels-_bj h_hB.yirig_frontage_-on_-__-_______ an_approv__ed_public_way_in excess of 601 --------------- nd area in excess of_5�000_sq_ft._ - --- -- -- --- - - — ------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant -----------Navmlceag Amusement__C__ompany_______-____ - ----------------------------------------- Address -------------------150_Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts --- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor-------_Carter-&--TottersEngineerill11or�.------------------------------------ Address ---------------------------------&aampacott-, I-Hass=hu.setts---------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ----8sSeg--SGuth--------------------------------------Registry Book----------3206------Page--------215 - 4. Location and Description of Property: ------------properf,3r-lo,2 tecl<--=-No mian_and_jCrombie_-____-- _______Streets------One---lotto hav_e_ frontake_ of_]41-39 on Crombie Street and 138.18 -------- -------- -------- _______on Norman Street with -an--area--of--19-,-717- sq.-_ft.- the other to have frontage -------------------------- 192 ft on Norman Street and an area of approximately 56,000 sq. ft. NA AG AMUSEMENT CO. Signature of OwnerC Yn TREASURER - - 150 Washingt n treet Address - ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- Y ----------------------- August 25, 1967 The Planning Services Group, 18 Eliot Street, Cambridge, Mass. Atten: — Mr. Morton Braun, Dear Mr. Braun: The next meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board ;ill be held on Thursday, September 7, at 7:30 P.M. at .34 Church -Street. Would it be possible for you to attend this meeting with a complete summary of what. has 11een done to date? Also, could you present an up to date bill at that time. , Very truly yours, JDTG:cc Chairman Via,°' DIVISION OF PLANNING Massachusetts Planning Memo Department of Commerce August 30, 1967 and Development Subject: Subdivision Control Law Amendment to Sec. 81 U, Ch. 41 Chapter 567, Acts of 1967 The Subdivision Control Law presently requires the subdivider to secure the construction of ways and the installation of municipal services by either a performance bond, a deposit of money or negotiable securities, or by a covenant whereby such ways and services shall be provided before lots may be built upon or conveyed, or a combination of these methods. Effective November 20, 1967, lots may also be released from the convenant if the subdivisider's lender, usually a local bank, contracts to secure the . construction of such ways and services with funds withheld from the subdivider. • The planning board is not bound to accept this alternate security, nor is the subdivider bound to offer it. Presumably it will be used only if deemed mutually advantageous. The text of the amendment is as follows: "Section 81 U of chapter 41 of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after the eighth paragraph, as appearing in section 1 of chapter 377 of the acts of 1958, the following paragraph:- "Following the recording of a first mortgage covering the premises shown on the plan or a portion thereof given as security for advances to be made to the applicant by the lender, the planning board may, at its option, release lots from the operation of the covenant given pursuant to clause (2) above, without receipt of a bond or deposit of money upon delivery to the planning board - of an agreement with the planning board, which agreement shall be executed by the applicant and the lender and shall provide for the retention by the lender of sufficient funds otherwise due the applicant to secure the construction of ways and the installation of municipal services. Said agreement shall also provide for a schedule of disbursements which may be made to the applicant upon completion of various stages of the work, and shall further provide that in the event the work is not completed within the time set forth by the applicant, any funds remaining undisbursed shall be available for completion. " Massachusetts Planning Memo Department of August 23, 1967 Commerce Subdivision Control Law and Amendment to Section 81-X, Ch. 41 Development PLANNING DIVISION 100 CAMBRIDG17 STREET ROSION, MASS. 02202 727-3221 So far this year, the only amendment to the enabling legislation for zoning or subdivision control is Chapter 248 of the Acts of 1967, which amends thesubdivision control law as follows: "Section 81 X of chapter 41 of the General Laws, as most recently amended by chapter 380 of the acts of 1966, is hereby further amended by adding the following paragraph:- "No register of deeds or recorder of the land court shall accept for record a notice of modification, amendment or rescission of approval of a plan of a subdivision unless such notice contains a statement by the planning board that such modification, amendment or rescission does not affect any lot or rights appurtenant thereto in such subdivision which lot was conveyed or mortgaged in good faith and for valuable • consideration subsequent to the approval of the subdivision plan. " This amendment is effective August 3, 1967. The exemption of these lots was already provided for in the existing section 81-W, and this new amendment merely makes necessary a formal statement to the same effect to the register of deeds or recorder of the land court. The petitioners felt that this would clarify matters for title searchers, conveyancers, and others unfamiliar with Chapter 41. • V;3 CIT Ttu 111 �lem, `jiz55�tchite#t zn .AT I`p g �ttF1X11 �p0 September 11, 1967 John M. Gray, Jr. CITY HALL Gerald T. McCarthy SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Michael Paskowski Albert R. Pltcoff Raymond E. Sweeney Board of Appeal, City Hall , Salem, Mass. Gentlemen : Re—Converting Building to Medical Office Building. This is with reference to the application of a building at 114-116 Richard MHieagev M.D. g for a variance for the conversion of ed for single family residences. Avenue which is in an R-1 district, zon The Planning Board does not have the slightest wish to even seem to interfere with the duties or functions of the Board of Appeals. However, the Planning Board does wish to call to the attention of the Board of Appeal, the following facts regarding the zoning Ordinance • in the City of Salem. 1. A medical building is not permitted in a single residence district under our Zoning Ordinance. No peer or authority exists under General Laws, Chapter 40—A, or under our Zoning Ordinance to grant "varianosi" for such purpose. The Planning Board wishes to be recorded in opp tion to the granting of the pending application. z. Such use must be granted, if at al.l, under the Special Permit pro— cedure of the Zoning Ordinance . This hTB. sub-paragraprovision h sub—sub—paragraph Ordinance in Section V, P the f, and if such an appeal is filed with the Boa rd AiPesaid section.ed ure would be under the Special Permit uses appearing Very truly yours, JMG :cc hairman • 0_11Ytv of ialem, 'Cttssarhusetts Palming pnttrb John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney Board of Appeal, City Hall, Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: Re-1 Raymond Rdad, - Hearing 8:45 P.M. Sept. 11. The Planning Board recommends that a "variance" not be granted to Mildred Caputi for the following reasons : 1. No, 1 Raymond Road is an R-1 district (one-family residential) in which only single family dwellings are listed under "Permitted Uses" under Chapter 35, (Salem Zoning Ordinance ), Section V, Paragraph A, Sub- paragraph 1. 2. Therefor, the premises are at present a "nonconforming use" in accord- ance with Chapter 35, Section VIII. In accordance with Section VIII, Par- agraph A. and in part the second subparagraph, "Nonconformities shall not • be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended, nor used as a ground for adding other prohibited structures or uses in the same district. 3. Chapter 35, Section VIII, Paragraph D. Subparagraph 1, further states that the provisions of Chapter 35, Section VIII, Paragraph F shall be used for such applications. 4. Therefor, as the provisions of Chapter 35, Section IX, Sections C and E, and of Section 15 of G. L. Chapter 40-A have not been met, i.e. this - variance would affect generally the Zoning District; there is no substan- tial hardship, financial or otherwise, there would be a substantial`-=tri^ ment tote public good and a substantial derogation from the intent of the Ordinance. 5. The enlargement and continued use of non conforming structures should not be encouraged. 6. Not only is this lot and structure "nonconforming" but the density regulations as listed in Chapter 35, Section VI, Paragraph glare already greatly exceeded. 7. A plan in accordance with Chapter 35 has not been filed. • t 2 _ • 8. Under Chapter 35, Section V, Paragraph B. Subparagraph 2 "Rest Homes" are specifically excluded from R-1 Districts. 9. The Planning Board would also call to the attention of the Board of Appeal To Chapter 35, Section V, Paragraph B. Subparagraph 4, which allows such uses in certain districts. Please note that such buildings could only be built of Type I or II construction as defined in Chapter 35. Further, in the same section you will note that no additions to any such home may be permitted unless the entire structure is of Type I or II construction. Very truly yours, JMG:cc • • r m Chi# of �$ttlem, fflassar4use##s jEannin$ uttr� John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski Albert R. PitcoB SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney Board of Appeal, Citay Hall, �P�✓�` Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: 107 Bridge Street - Hearing 7:00 P.M. September 11. The Planning Board recommends that a 'variance" not be granted to Paul H. DesRoches for the following reasons: 1. 107 Bridge Street is in an R-2 (two-family residential ) district in which only one or two family residences are permitted in accordance with Chapter 35 (Salem Zoning Ordinance) Paragraph B, Sub-paragraph 2 are per- mitted. 2. Therefore the premises are at present a "nonconforming use" in accord- ance with Chapter 35, Section VIII. In accordance with Section VIII, Par- agraph A. and in part the second sub paragraph "Nonconformities shall not • be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended, nor used as a ground for adding other prohibited structures oruuses in the same district. 3 . n Chapter 35, Section VIII, Paragraph D, Subparagraph 1, further states that the provisions of Chapter 35, Section VIII, Paragraph F shall be used for such applications. 4. Therefor, as the provisions of Chapter 35, Section IX, Sections C and E. and or Section 15 of G. L. Chapter 40-A have not been met, i.e. this variance would affectene�rallX the Zoning district. There is no substan- tial Hardship, financial or otherwise, there would be a substantial detri- ment to the public good and a substantial derogation from the intent of the Ordinance. 5. A plan in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 35 has not been filed. Very truly yours, JMG:cc CtU of $alem, fflttssarhusetts • STI S�CpaNp, planning lnJ Yra b John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy CITY ALL Michael Paskowski Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney Board of Appeal, City Hall, / Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: Re-114-116 Highland Avenue; Hearing 8:15 P.M. Sept. 11. The Planning Board recommends that a 'variance" not be granted to Richard E. McKeage, M.D. for the following reasons: 1. A medical building (so described in the legal notice) may not be constructed in an R-1 district, single family residential. 2. The Board of Appeal has no authority vested in them either under Chapter 40-A .G.L. or in Chapter 35 (Revised Ordinances of the City of Salem) to grant such a 'variance". • 3. The application would be more proper if it were for a "Special Per- mit Use" in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 35 (Salem Zoning Ordinance) Section V, Paragraph B. Subparagraph 1, sub-subparagraph a - However all the conditions required under sub-subparagraph 1 can not be met because the Doctors will not live in the premises, and in all prob- ability more than one regular employee will be on the staff. 4. The Board of Appeal acting under the provisions of Chapter 35, Sec- tion IX-D with reference to the last sentence of the first subparagraph does not have the power to grant any special permit where use of land or structure is specifically excluded from the district. 5. The Planning Board further takes the position that the intent of Chapter 35 (Salem Zoning Ordinance ) Section V, Paragraph B. Subparagraph 1, in spirit has not been shown i.e. in spite of the professional aspects of this application, this is a "commercial" venture. 6. A plan in accordance with the provisions in Chapter 35 has not been filed. Very truly yours, JMG:cc • X 01-11i#u of 'Sttlem, 'Mttssar4me##s ,,���py 1l��yy���♦y�r� (rr�1'5ryyYr`y • 9��CUllYE Aylu=i g Ly YH4Y John M. Gray, Jr. N 41 Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski Albert R. Pitcoff SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Raymond F. Sweeney Board of Appeal, City Hall, Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: Re-198 Loring Avenue; hearing 6:45 P.M. Sept. 11 The Planning Board recommends that a "variance" not be granted to Lloyd E. Winer for the following reasons : 1. No. 198 Loring Avenue is an R-1 district (one-family residentialO in which only single family dwellings are listed under "Permitted Uses" under Chapter 35, (Salem Zoning Ordinance) , section V. Paragraph A. Sub- paragraph 1. 2. Therefore the premises are at present a "nonconforming use" in accord- ance with Chapter 35, Section VIII. In accordance with Section VIII, Par- agraph A. and in part the second sub paragraph "Noncnnformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended, nar used as a ground for adding other prohibited structures or uses in the same district% 3. Chapter 35, Section VIII, Paragraph D. Subparagraph 1, further states that the provisions of Chapter 35, Section VIII, Paragraph F. shall be used for such applications. 4. Therefor, the provisions of Chapter 35, Section IX, Sections C and E, and of Section 15 of G. L. Chapter 40-A have not been met, i.e. this var- iance would affect senerally the Zoning District. There is no substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, there would be a substantial detriment to the public good, and a substantial derogation from the intent of the Ordinance. 5. In addition the Density Regulations listed in Chapter 35, Section VI, Paragraphs A and B are already greatly exceaded. Furthermore, even if this were a B-1 or Neighborhood Business district, a setback of 15 feet would be required. This is on a corner lot that already does not comply with modern safety and traffic regulations. An addition to such a structure should not be encouraged. 2 6. A plan in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 35 has not been filed. Very truly yours, JMG:cc • • 0 04-11ttv uttXezn, ttssttc �tsetts • ��� P �c 1k2tlCltitt$ �DMYL� John M. Gray, Jr. Gerald T. McCarthy CITY HALL Michael Paskowski - SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Albert R. Pitcoff Raymond F. Sweeney To All Planning Board Members : It has been my impression for a long while that the majority of "variances" and '!special Permits" have been granted by the Board of Appeal in violation of both our Zoning Ordinance and G. L. Chapter 40—A. I personally feel that if our Ordinance is going to mean anything that we should take a strong stand on all petitions that are of a debat— able nature. Therefor, I have made a rough draft of letters I would like the Board to send to the Appeal Board on some such cases. • It is not that I am personally "for or against" these petitions, rather it is the way I interpret the Ordinance. I would appreciate it if you could review these comments and edit them in any way you see fit. Please bring them with you to our September 7 meeting so we can have our comments in the hand of the Appeal Board beforettheir meeting on September 11. Very truly yours, JMG:cc John Me Gray, Jr., Chairman _m_C -,O—r rAA r_ C. .------ 140 __�✓_/�r�c_e___ _----. _—_i•—/�/o / 5'8 �°2 i L c—�u c_._i s—�c'�l'-� 2 Vii„.��y 4 4.e__ar 7 7 7 �CGr/ °N !/ ! �2ACq✓cr�_c— -- --- ---/f ,a aa --�- -��_R,E- ---�fC-R��2_Y - .__CZ [.A_rG+r_ ._C�c.c[�.0_k._�j_•_ � s!�littc4guR_Ncun v_S1_ bGtt) {r2�C.t -c-i CG� 4ic< °r --- �GG2/[ ntCs (' C4reM+rr0 eu4CN i - �- --- - -- - ------ ----- ------i- _ - --�- -- - --- ---- - - -- - -- - m __ __ ------ ------ -- ---- 1.CAI till /_tZq_—_.12 — C —�—------- ��..�C`.-�.�<. -�/_4_T r G_•�--M 7Jl.—N_0_T��—1—�C O Lj ri-2_(!C G.h L7.v 7T}_---- ---- -- - --- -._•/—'.O_R._./.It-- ���'�_�rG_�- _—.J-S _..1.—(�Kur fGo O FD rr�w w GGf Cp 3-- 14 � 4 �GZC—f���._. -J�J t_Ci/�6—��'_�rr • Y__(_!S� _.iu _�A c c-o neo OC- -- fJ2_0.✓-.f_• -- --_— � /z p-t N 4 r✓ (.0 J G C.r i_tl_V.—Y- /`Li.4.i._G_✓Lw i�— F -- — --�•— --�(S_a__-S_�d_PnrL.A C L'wra -�'�-•------N D_.Lct_G.v._G2-_.. A_<_L—L'kC- -.--_C_41✓_!?[_rr q_k_T __!C_<-_G��-LR-`-n---!J.k2C..e2..__SU_,4c. Suit�wlZeCte��_! -- ---- ---ems/u N u�_�E__[rj G r---RC C..�_�l c- –Fh t---�v__c_c_�2 r–- c.,.�c..�- �✓�% -- I" OPI r_Y_. --G.m--_c_o_7_CE- L✓ r �- -'�C--- 4f.C _ _ /X' 4�_e.r w_ - __ -- n12A_GR� I�____poC_h/_or - 1�•av� - _ro - C2�ti r � Vy_T�,G-e%^_ c. -/>_�L.�tr+ •.C—l✓_hu._<Zl_ _.CLS_C_o.�_—_�__. ra_C -------- ------_ a_3�� 4-A-C Z IPP�, —I;p�.lt!_!� -EL.A_r tL� r 3 S_ti✓ __rN_0-w w--- bA � a Wo 06, 00 -p�-/44_ .--[// A_C�.U-2Q.// ki.G�.__- LTti _ .rlr.G__._ .�/ZO .f/`__T a_A A -r — /I •_. Cr,,�� . ce 3S l✓ r u6r 134-" LCD, �9 ^N-1,1 'a Q _•'. � � Yry 040_ 2�._.-_ __ . -.__.-_-- _-_ ___.-_ .__--. _--t_- -.-_-.-_.-_ .---__ VIII, ---- yU�-fir �S_G_ _ N°-�— BC __. CR?u!G.v_—�o��c n-✓�G b - _�'�`' u_r—/--- -- cr _ is w_i✓rC�_ as_c-r ll s_cw �wGcC/N_G_5 eG—�G�S O UNpC-R—�2�m! -!LLD_u_fC( �W-�Cofr ----2, e c)Oy _A •� � •' 4 u ♦ 5 ® --- �.—_Nor 7,_ t/r__ nCcu_G'�✓-z-C_C—Gu.trk_�C✓_��rG2 _ -J'J_N_nr _ /✓cr _ _ _`LA)O c_---. -_� ----------- cyYDA'J •---- �-r 'b o � 7 S�l - of y d h--, S4,- J1 iZtv- -1i=ubf -7!/1_.. lL/ ---'29 )7J2'r1- /_._ ..�+�, -yYi�Vry � -..r" cp-> Ri �l'�/U- ---- ---------- -. -_ _ _. .._ --- - - --Jy— nor 7 J 0-41 _...>.T>i 20.e5 r /'/---j!!✓J S17�-iY�--77Jn- '17nj_----5-�'7�q-���'r�-----ryJ-I-FIT'1- - - -- � --- - -�- L s. �,7��/y��n1---�v>d�� �a a'✓eJ�—�_•�1—n7�o iin 3 1.iY ---- -- KrO-V �. -- —&644/lo_�— _f,�lr - - - --- �/_s!4—�?/r. htii�✓G - b 440 2.2'Lc��v ✓�, L ��_r4�r ,� .Ir/AiliiLw - - lZtSt/JGyri_� c � - _0444! -fiAm ��y�_2Crr p4tiC-Cr—Lr_.e_C,/°-CAC/k2 rrencc_cR9A4, c4 c��rs A -- -- -•--�U__f,!_�n.K/i G.22�<< __Z.—d zG-� •C2 rr.� ;rG r�,-- ------�----- - ---- -- - -2'- -//✓_CR-G�ok,.__TI�G.--j?iL1Cn-si SGt _—/!2G _ __/1r' �.Zf�SG_4_r A . �Lc..r , o ` -4c.co/CQ�c�-e [ --i-- -- W _�i--dun-- rl - -^-�- - G---- - ----- -- _—tcca`° - -Sua�Ae,'CC4 C'T-- -----_ r 1 u /j ,__ -•. �U_�-_�� �t�_ C-24��, ----�- F�R_ruG2----srn �Qs __T_!�/�r __TLG-_-_— - -�'e0 ✓t ri O6 { Ot -_ .CN[��rGG_ 3S �G C!.U4- - �XeA.-- - --- - - - GIZA-p-4— F Y&24c-- 6G._.-- G<f_4.o_ - F'oR_ _ duck- -R216_eCp_ r-! cg_s_. - r4.0 �AbO C �b0 0� sGC/ I06 / rs' Oc C.G . tt+ny�c� 4U - A� ^'CT_,- --- -- -- — r— �� .------ - ----T//rf //_if,Pt <4C.C-.--hJ_�U-�-u---/.•I_f ,cC-71 GGdJ_ Q L.Y—T4_LI------ --- C.r"' -- - - 14 A - I - t7./,A,Ti _C_/ . �— O'i-_- D.;n4,C-$t,1s4-,/__ 7"VC-Mc cta.ue o, 4O - r6C_ - /h.rcmv . op _ )W 4C e_20_r .ei � GG .- - - - J_�-$.P_/NI'°!/t�.L-.Y_.- -_D_C(CQG�.T,!'Org .lcK�/h-.- -..---- -- ---�_-_— . �L/a ?r nC4o RO • e. CC wi-rk rAt �Ra u, rruyr a6, 00.r --. 34ts,.---FI.U.Eo. __ - ---- ---- ------ - � C QC __ /r 4 G,+_ �G i sd a{is c K/ p .r--lGa_• -- - it _ I7a_u.0/� C_Y_ AGC �! n_p,RCCSC0 -- 7c — ---- Pf ESC — ----�rS Cor rad LfrrCi4 Alm r. C. - --- -VIC4.q_ _- .4--_C.o 9 5_\. - r0. -_�/(Cli- C. A 4, lr<4-_C_ l2 _ LYl_CM_IPG�._-Cl�rb - 401,-C __G�-4 c C_—T4,,a 4_44 a )_/ r—_C_[Att._.POEe,n,-,sr_A, _H J+ G--�G_E1i �fl/_N_/-,c 'o .�Yry —I' ____ �LZ/L!3_D _�/,P��/�_c --lw _vr. c,_4_.�_rivw _ . .O_�---��_r�t—a.✓R -- -- -•---Zo_k_CU_G-._�2�t_tv_//✓_CG- --A°p - C__�-.__�qJ+�G_/� __`_�G_-_,�. -,_ __ ,_ A, r .C-, T/iAc___c,jG __77;4sr'G__-4_- _ /O4,C__-r_4A_!__ •12C_. - -fvrrG------fUC4 C/J.tCf. -- -- - - --- 4 L-y _ f CD2o.1GA .vCG • - -� t✓ oL -L0 -cif R�-CYA�4-- 0T -- - �--_jli.Ern -�4---�_�'_ _C✓n tau fCG. _F (_f,_ 1 �, t'---- - --- _ _ -- - - --- -- -- --- __I<_CA_fC _ 9✓L,+�C - -T/iG�i.--- Cv�l'Y ---y'-ou-- ,t°-. -Oye-- -�/�-7-- - _ _-_ _--. __MC.G_r_r/a_G-_ _.__ -So_- _C.J.0 _._�.4-.a.-____NA_u G_-OUQ __ COi✓e �Gk�r__. _ Ld-_ T�.C.____-__ _ - - 144A� o of rnG ���� cac� onRa BEFe_te� TUC � � `— � n r �AY,_AUGUST 28, 1967. a .p atae � LegalLegal Nat15�°P Lugol Noti�ere Legal NM�tcaSTIIT� � a ..aa sasses .... ..... ........ - �NWF-ACTH OF COMMONWF.ALTH'OF COMMONWEALTH OF CITY OF SALEM. AGHOSE RT MAsBACH!$ET'T8 ib ..;MASgACHDSETT8 - BOmd of Appeal o- qTE COURT ' PROBATE COORT PROBATE COURT Will give a Public hearing„th i Docket No.35381 fifeuses {Docket Nn 288 Eaux,aarM. Dpcket No.293296 all Mterealed p¢rnom on the Yroul M. A liHT To BARBARA J. WHrlEi 'To aH parsons Interested in petff.h Ot Mee 1, King, 48 f ave-ted e. A libel TORN C.WIH1E end JUDTTH the estate.of BENRY P. Mc- Leash Street, to-cassava and 'Our adet a said 'aL. WHITE, all f Arlhrgah REAN late of Wealth.In sell replace m existing two Mary row Soe.ELASNE M the Cutely of bT+ddleux: County. deceased. A atition porch, and asking ltnt the Of Solea,in telt PATR➢CIn A"GAUDEr,.of he, been meaeated to said Board grant a varnmee from Essex,praying that Medford a said County a Mid. Court for.probate of a�certain the appSmUon of the Zo iHwn the bond of dleyer; EILJyAe OARFS. jum meat Purporting to W the Orlmence.The hearing ediylbe q 'between herself and of Danvers,..C.JEWEPl' last will of said dormant by IteM U the oldies oP the Inslap. ,d pray, ,Le¢suss of eM RSCHARD R. JEWEIT. MARIAN MrR WIGGLES- ton Of Buildiaga,Room 7,Uty for and praying fm,alt- beth of Middlean:nail SALEM WORTH,Of Wilson In the State Had, Salam, on Monday, Sep, to[ umtody o[ and SEAMEMS ORPHANS AND Of Wyombg; HENRY P:Me teraber ll;19fi7,at 840 P.M it minor OfiBd If CHII.DA.LN'S FRIEND: 56 t{EAN,TUMOR Of,New York :180ARD OF APPEAL tobjeel therea,you CIL1Y,.of Salem, ell in said In the State of New York,and BY Soseph F.Doyle, "rney shouts file a County.of Bases. and ELLEN MENRI J.BOURNEUF of Bev- `& %trance in saitl L,JEWE3T,a Bangor in the; ei•,ty N the County of Es A Secretary lam within costly. State of Memo. A peWm.hey see w.Z,28,1967. the sixth day of baen presented to said'Court m.to that they be-jm.t, v i47,the return day by NAUMREAG TRUST COM- °%°recurs NereOf,without Illy- ,i CELT OF SALEM g" 'on. , PANY;of sand Salem;ea i!k hg a surety o their bonds. It Boaed a Appeal JOHN A COSTEL trustee order the'oBI of S. You object therein you or your Will give.a pubo[ heaning OHIII A. C SMof L Eustso u da Moe ofill A! of gt[omey M,uht file a writtenFirst Gell atmesked person.the p_eleventh de of said Salem,may ng the Court ppeamnce a Bald.Caurt:at petition of MtidrtH Copupi to I. Y Salem before ten o',Ink in the erect'av addition at the rear PE or Irtvhsrtlona,and for such funmm� onthefifth-day of a rut home at 1 RuMend. N J.„COSrELiq• cher mtl Iwther relief m set S ptmlber 1%7,theretum day Road min aekmg the! ilia ,• Regular. r forth a end pefftkn. 11 you of thin tilatia - Hoard great a vatlmc¢ Rom desire tPAject thereto you or v. th's-i JOl�i A OJSTE4 Lice Your atarneYehoWd file In said nenve. he oP the Pmbg NWy:ALl'H OF` Court at Salam a wNtten ap �'wire,Firs!Judge of said Ordnance.The bearing wHl be. ACHCBETTB-"^ `Pearanre art answer or,other C01rt'this Nrdh day of August held ba the office of the Insfdc• 1TE COURT legal Pleading, wdthm-twen 1%7. err a Bullditree,ROOM 7,Qty - 1 one data atter the sigh[ee h _. I JOHN J COSTE[.IX)" Hall, Saler,on Money. Si, D°ek n ere Mn1 day of Septa ber 1%'l,the a liglt ter. Number 11,1%T at 8:45 P.M d 'awls dnterested .n Aug Id 2l,28 1%7 - HOARD OF APPEAL 'fLEWIS..ALLEN..turn day of thin eltatim." �{ BY Jos ODY he said Couv- Witham,,JOHN A ODSTEI. - Mph F.Doak, . • , LJ, Esquire first Judge Of tvb'CITY OF SALEM Or.- `Y6\ .. Seoroa¢ry psa been Preemad'sant Court ffiu twenty-fifth Board of Appeal Aug:25,:28,1%7. day s1 August 1%7. WIR give"a Pufihc hears g to ofor Probate of a ..-JGI@7 J.�..¢s,�.n all'Interested persoru on the „ CITY OF SALEM it willent fsaiddpurporting -: a Register.-h,Petition.Of.the Naumkeag "Bound a Appeal ` {t w1U of veld do- Aug.28;SePL 4,ll,l%T. 'An ame osit Company to rno- Will give a pubkc henriag •'B7E W. � slant aria operate e,gas¢ern. to all Interesfad perema on tha Ju iba County of TOWN OF.BAMB,TON, y Ice -led- at the+corner of petition ,of Joseph S. RaB. g'Met Ne be.app EOAnin OF APPEAL; Nomaen'and crumble Streets, �a Universal Steel A Tied. 'trix thereof,with- Notlm,ol ymle,Heming and eska6�that the'Board ng Corp"299 Bridge Suet to wets on her bond a piaokc hemlrg will be held g+ant'e variance from the a erect a building eMaskag that r l'e'a object there- at the Town Hell,Hamdan at patteath;Of the Zo p the'Board grant a variaDCe Nig Oidfn- Dom the application.of the, 1' 'r attorneyesIn ep0 p,.., Wednesday, Sep ecce.The'hearhg wW tie held yonhg Ordinance.•the he sting aPPeerence in 4ntlxrr 13.1981,on the-septics.lnrthe'oM.of the Ih antor a[ . Salem before ten ton'of Nathan B Tucker;pro- M Bullmoda:Boom 7,City Ha11,'whet be lain,. the apse of JS forenoon m the Rued operetm, And Unot K Selma,on Moedae.Septenbm the Iaspeetor of 8uildinga, {Sep[evbd 1%7, 5laratere,owner,for a verlance 11,IM,,at 8:30 P M Room 7, SCityep Hale ga4m,m O y of this dtatioa trout the .-y AlOaldy, September It 1%7r [ IHN A Zdf p°OO°I°m.of the Eon• 'BOARD OF APPEAL a!7:15 P.M. °• Hg Sydaw,a a Specht Per ` SY Joseph F.Doyle, - BOARD OF APPEAL 't flrot Judge'of mit R. sillier le-required, in Secretary , has ninth.day of order to Permit the aper ith m at Aug,25,28,1%T.i y r BY Joseph F Doyle ' the mtlaOK Citgo service stn fes"p--f-pg�-� Aug. Secretary 1y. �J.IYISTEL7A, . tlon on Bey Road'ad a new and r' ,^r r e e•,: Z, 28 1967. }'* At's Heed oar de 1 rshiP„subject a P er• Rome OF AppealI YH -, Cf1R OF BALBM.. ;.1967- the issumir of a Dretclesn mo- a Will give e'pubhe�Merin to ''sin. Based M Appeal .. s. f _ tan-did-losese by the Select. all kk,.W pugad a'on eche Will Hive a public hearing to :NWEALTH. T mea:Said premises appear itAGRUJIpetition of Doarec S.BeleWnaw; Interested persora m tin 'rE-COU TTB be presently entitled by way Of for a Specht Pemrtt to cfvma Petition Of Salem Acres, Hee,,. 4. uncC1t NO.UM eoIXotmimg use a-Yoe open a-&j,.j.-JmMm,amt Friendly -•®, insNo.llT276 e0on aP a.service autiov, per-Ice Crehan Corporation. at 331'm Lot Lid WiNtlanraff Road, ins Inkrested in for.lvg vino.repabM and hold Lot 199 Crescent Drive,Lid M. @. le under+he wW erg a eerniWrlaya moa[vehicle IafaYette Sheet and asking that tin Board grant a variance Crescent Dove, and ung 151 L6 PICHMAN deakm license. a.,+....:: { OmnGE G.HEtY{LTf tram.the-epplkaHon of Una tT scent Drive,ant asking that e oP, 6maeea, - ZOniag OtWeract.. The hearse lbs Bth. grave variance. 3; tleeeased far 'q JOHN,F NEARY - mll'be,luld k lire office o1 sena'from Ne apPikalan of the f HER DAUGH- 6I, GRANT CRO1YCTr.vAll beor ld BWM erring \ .Board o APpeWe-' ag.Rao.T. Zoning Ordinance, The h h,tarty-sevenih, Aug %. Said. 5 1%7.,. CtiJ, Hell, Sale n MmWay, rR be hold hr the office a the September 1L 1%7 at 7:30 P.M.'l^'tactor M Smiling,,Room 7, dy-ninth and.B. COMMONWEAIITH n - BOARD OF APPEAL'. City Hall, Sa1em,'on Monday. ,.aldwet have - OF MABSAOHC6ETTS BY Joseph F Doyle,' SePsebei 1L 1%T,at 7:45 P.M a said Court .PROBATE COURT + Searmary.l 'BOARD OF APPEAL Essex,p" Docket NO.293223 Aug.25,25,1967 r y BY Joesph,F. Boyle, r Object Uarea - Toell'perdone inlnes4a n „ yA. Secretary. a nay should Ne the estate of.WLADYSLAW ,.e Aug.25,2g .. ranee,in said MATOI.A-late of,Salam._,a OITY OF BAI.F.M ,3987 "' • :.. I^before+lm said County, deceased Beard N Appeal CI an 0Of SALEM iCapwr m the A peUtim has hem pro- WW give a Public ilearing a Hared F Appeal o[ September all interested cersuva on,the Will seated t°-said Court for Pro- give a PnhUc hearlag a - I ey Of Oda eta baa,f_a_cecWn_aatxummt pet Uon of;F Sohv De5en0e all mtereated,Para. on the_' ¢""moo' purporting t° be the last oil rid F'Paul lie eau 63-eridga peuhbri of the Estate of Mar PA'rCOSIEL Of old dereeud by-:CHAR• Street, bound d by;Lactone gentle T.Griffin,6 Water Io- Judgaoteaid Of old HDy AND;JOSEPH Strait ant East DOWas Street,.land Road;'to wet, a single •v, ,. th day of^Au- MITULA', both of Salem a for a variance from the,applies. family dweBlag,. ant aWdng Ne TULA-- of Essex.-loaning than of me•2ome Ordinance to that-the.Board grant a vari.e. COSTELLO, that the,be eppnlnted ems. P°abla'lhem a ubtllVN¢.We Mae from Rce apPRcetim Of . 1,- Register aro.thmeot, wlthmt glvke.a IMM..The hearing will be held the i&n.1 ` Ordnance. The ant'5,3967. 'surety.on'.Nair bunt`a-.�„,t' in Ne office Of the inspect.of hearing will be held in the of. +' 1 H.rose dmlre a ablest lhwe• Sunni,on Monte, Setptervber IJoin,Rooms 7,City�Hrall,Sel n, J DANCE ' a yoeor sari attorney s}Dote 1I,I%i at 6:30 P.M - + On Monday,September 11,1%T, a fila a written appearance a ,BOARD OF APPEAL i.at 9.30 P.M.- aimu • and Court t Salem; before By Joseph F• Doyle, BOARD OF APPEAL- neon cao Ian b'=a the forenoon on Seerc 'enP Maa�a.Je the fifth.day of Seintand er A .25 1%T t'r`' ,,.HY JOuph F.D,Ie, arm a_snre 1%7, the return day of thus Secretary _ tl[ayov. p ,4 - Ag.Z'28.'1%T. RE-36-1 d'Mm� Witu ds, JOIBi•A: COS. ret C�Ty.OF SALEM I. -*.C=OF SALEM' n-aem,r wa. TEL Fvquire Flint Judge r Board a,Appeal Y' Bberd o[A )N Balham of.Heid Court, We eighth-day Will give a Public heerbg to Will give a Public hearing Shim of August,1%T. 1 all mterestaci persons on the 3 steres d perems ringa. JO . JOHN J..WSTEL7A cetlrtbn. f Richard E. Mc- T[ w�om,.a - Regimen Aeege, MD,-to' ronvert the etitlm,of Aonatd C. Cuff. ..ar,wm r a 6PeWa1 Permit a cenoit Aug.34,M,28,1967. s Property,at�114-116 Highland be construction of a nmehg' CNH[ONWF,dLTH: Avenue 'to dual office one at K HighlaM Avenue,be i€n [• OF MAB9ACHU9ET18'• bWhHvg,'ant saking that the a Occupied as a nursing,cora P PROBATE COURT -e Board grass[ a vmlence Smm' akattnt and rest home.The _ the applkatim of the Zoning , _ Bases, as. Docket No. 2833 Orvllnance:The bear will be as wW be held in the of. To all persona mtnestM erg ce of the Inrpector of Build• wane, held ion the office of ere Hutt ". the estate of AAT6RIR P. to,Pf Bulk&i6a Room 7,City 1.ga,oR ch, 7, city mBell, IL . LIVAN,'lafe Of Seism lv:sg Hall,.'Salau,'m Monday. Sep PM WONGS County. S..a. tendrer11.a%7ata15P.M. WARD - A id here been preeente HOARD OF APPEAL w;'. OF APPEAL �A certain heM.Covet tan Probak'ot a i] d BY,Joseph F Doyle". 111 e1 y Joseph F.Doyle, /!l certain last oenf f aid dae Secretary > Secretary a,be the by VI well of sant dr Aug,25,2S,3%T -1, ug,25,28,1967. ceased by MARY E. X. - CITY OF SALEM IAYAN of Salem a the County a CITY OFISALEM Board of Appeal - 533.1TOP f Emm, praying that Me,b Hoard or Appeal Will give a Public hearirg to Malbhen appointed exemtrm thereof WN'give a public.hearing to all interested peryOna na the without giving a surety m.he a0 Interested Persons On the petition I Lloyd E Win, bond' petition a Paul H DuRodhims d/b/a Lloyds Drug 199 Aar p R You desire a ow4 Urge a er agthe building at IN Ing Avenue,a erect an add '� you r your attorney should Bridge Street a provide a tion a an nationals drug sl ve, wrlden appearance In sal fourth apmhhent ant Baking and asking that theStand i blurt at,Salam before sten that.tire-lsoard_ r ana.a-vavl. y 'CO\I lClV y.ALTtl bwldUlg'and rale 'llmt„the .t-mHIgiiienL Avenues to--1 OF MASSACBOSEM;,� Board grant a� ce tram templed,ae a naming, \�Da+ly 1a PROBATE COIIBR_ 0e applkatlm of 1Te.Zaning. eke nt end rest home.The Essex, sa. Docket No..2933 eating wBi be held the a- .. Ortline2e.'The hearing will-be, emawB.•. To ell.Potsota interested heM in the affe.of the i n an. tt'of.theBroa Infector at B A - the estate of AATHHR.P.. ter:of HWldOssga Room T,CttY. �' Room.7,City Hall, Be.Sa• ]"V ''late of Salem.ln..eal tar B,.Salem, m Mean,,7ny, SeP on Monday.Septandber IL W ONG S En°ceAea tea he n Preaen IABD OFeAPPEAL at 9:00 P.M. BOARD OF APPEAL to cold Coart for pmbate'o[a - .-8Y Joxph F. DnYle, ��' certain ivahtanent pnvporting HY Joseph F DOYIe, 1<I' Seoratary to be the.last wW of eald de- a Secretory W 25,2S,1961. ceased n3' MARY£. %. Ash.23,23,I%T ..W-\, LNAN M Salem 1n Me:Coon ; CITY.OF SALEM. +IX li CITY OF'HALEM A Hoard of Appeal 57L1700 f Essex, Praying that ane b 5': Board of AppeM will give a public beelto NerNn6an appointed elmeatrlx thereat Wit give a public hearing to aH Interested persona on the Without 91Wng a aurety on.he at Interested persons on Oe pet(ton of Uoyd E. Winer. banal' Petition of Pau]H D aiiarhaaa dAs/a lloyd'a Drug 193 Illa H You dea re to ob.Fct them ( Wier the natio ng t 107 Ing A ane,toe t 19 add;- you or YaF tt0[neY Awuld Bridge Stret, to pr°vMe tion t an exHtlng dru tare. written appearance M sai fourth aparhnant and eating.andgthat th Soanl Cant tSalem be[ore lav that the Board grant arl- grant a varanm fmm the ap• X o'ciack in the forenoon on We m from the ppllcaBan of Plltfon of the Zning Orli- eightee�M day of Septamber the ZoningOrdinanm. The a.nce, The hearing will ba dO%T,the return day of 1Ns cite heatlilgwallhebelsin [- held M the otBre of'rhe In•Bm of the Impedor oe Bulla• for of Buildings Room T. Witless, JOHN A. lXJST __ Ings.Room ,, Cit, Baal, Sa. ity Hai Salon, on Mond-Y, HA Eaqute,.First Judge o lam, n MnrdaYSeptember pttmber 11, 1%T et 6:95 aid Court, this twenty-eecona 11,1967,at 7:%P.M. .M. day of August, 1967. K BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL w JOHN J.OOSI'ELtO° BY JOSEPH F.DOYLE, WBY JOSEPH F.DOYLF., Register s ...Semetmy. .. Secretary. 'Rag.26,23,Sept.5.]%i. - August ZS,23,1%7. Qy W.2T.1%7. c a n r"aTHE EVENING NEWS„ ¢ r '` Winter Coin Horoscope .° , { q ..ByYAWRYladmlYForecast WNW,. paw n, -HOLLYWOOD (AP) Hat bmad5aet W Deeeni nhon sun wan pahDig th then H9 Grroll Righted'' '" eewls."`a mhele m over:ore 100demee T11e hea[tofrjr - mark ant it.was hums: But perkanmt, 61 " caster had come W P Wercentury-Park.', TOEBDAYy AUG.YB ' gAGITTAR109 We`w- 'g2 be Place." e L.. ' eYtoe kr u fl little park.j 6F,NEbAL TPIPDENDIEgr Dee.2U Aeancieka and kgh Workmen tame eMpped W On one sae W,the'. Vrstll shortly atter edam meet DZ.,M) not egree,.bu at be We waWt were building anew- m ary.whoee mer' w1V�,�me�d�lC�twye evenW can m loved ya;to:keeP art of any.haws; ctt ting-snow'ErlfW, bleaae keenkance baPPaninB tDa[ cavae.Sou W aigamenk"m18ht-maw.` Fhad frosting bkeming .PIs-Aeaplted wonder what you are doing that better ways of-getting ahead'chmbs with whi4 ant-:ateamLM e'me felao-fcwm, wmvg but It's pat the planate Wsteed. Your rarer parmere ap the wadowe.of iLe book thWe'no trees in t peraWg m DMng-yon a much bnaw-beat ham W''clear W ah.P.the newspaper o[Bca ant Who,end whey Bur }better;set a. Wmmmkvices Problematical aMm" Ilmen he e gn D[.Rhcal aeeroM Brom of. on,the workmen at ander wherein th concede in the them.', e ,y'.�, } °e�gke.leaves. d da}d wsend:You-can 11M the OAPRICARN(Dec,s2 to Tae Far me next 1 couple,'==w beet remevW cams,. promisee Em Wy'tao,.b,wu,bma 20) Yw mus[ Pla -Your tun m mums: N mm velli we, LdlY mad the mug teem until afternoon. ]Mn very wisely if you are to.c ry with, perspiration b e a d I n g ertNBY lashed , works out N harmony with your thmWd, th regal r teak d through Heir pee ate makeup Wed whlk tlR I desire for anwsement j'. caw work nom cm.new into dawning areuM th (k showTh pR of all AMDEJ1 (Mar.21.k A 191 a.Dant create further b. hoheary'ovei k dial ideas plowed ow t N! You help W Use may+ m e fq kms far Y ma f.,fell t. ee .shivering and bbmg'.-milt d aa{{ Convloclry motion durirM day and dont Yo'uraei'f with loved ore:and bei toned hands - r ¢ . stmidl n starts,a make any dices 0heng s Ica happy. - : From.th beginning of th the vvyy paper-eacki merest aetagr,. er Gar} ARUARIUB (Jan. 21 m Feb pmgream thre seasons back kedded foam rul day'a[ evytDing, [e hve!19)'Uae mot eMxdva my.I the vewmg soap opera h them shape:.Thine? moueh FNewvg cad W 'WW"ado8y m deawg with parthen etched Its wbaor scenes t with excelsar,.we -ventmapnece,[cmaeock. tri rlg3it now vd g t.?he Cert seasonal,clung m New Eng and held in place . TAURUS(Ail¢'.20 m L{ey'p)1 awns naw Posemk in some cew Eoonswer I. sae Ela'+ng..16e Way..l t be ao iudepeMmt A.DL ma thea toelgbt lame Me Cb=.to wtere it in most Im can be more hmmomova d pr�danw; 1 .. haPPY Do not lon,,a rust" (� 20 f Mei 20) -. 6♦' cut aecurtty.Tmale[pt rY Imparmnt"Umaprove.eVnV t se_ good nim t h db Procert,at and efficiency el you[aurr umd- - A; take, so e at A bather level 1 M you want to get[eeUy } OEBBRdI(AW9'IS'ir'JOPea21) Lve resWa mall of Your opsm a Get cut it m tlr braise rid tis.'Iaatem to what a roey/k4 ��i' and-accoreMbab a good lea he. worker has m suggest. Thus { 4{Mb if ahead of getting same ams a gu- could help m jmmmuW,yoR mens d tame tint coved prove we. � By Abigail Ude;B_U,, to be MembNlaapy Pramnotlon, 2w YOUR MILD IS ROBN ' an. ae with cm coaft TDAY. he:or at,adult be c Heap busy. one,w'jii Interesting '` .�,ia rd'm a #I-,.. ,{ } \ •_ MOON (2IDAy8EN (June 22 Youogatcs wish a quick mind I HAR AHBY:q em 9;and have been a.widow' to 'Jute,21) Sime you are whowin cawed'.-IM "Wing now.Abby.I m w Dameeaceeker,but a maixied, fresh ed with some m ed.and gm.Moea,..o W rwWYto answee coming by my house W ace HW lately.He and his w. cannot get out our the bunion. ahem no mlmmaa.a can'Ds.mighles.tome for over 20 years,He's W.ao% world,Bet Way-Your move- FWd-d V tram:We'wmsvg addrW he ma tee wM¢..at had mob In research Wry affair', Isparta et hare. Peoae-HDow ave sod does LW3 .eagle pf oa pals ^--�a Ig en.nine regalia cleared the evrneagemmtmmmmt ruwb We4.hla ad"I'!went north to visit sone/€ Lome. Aad to Its value. 9 In mature 115, Anything car sone/.calms WLkhouse.In the bedroom Ifa4 I LEO (Jedy'M 0'Au6 ell Heeled calm poo.W bees wtiet Intl cards W had_seat hid wife,end l was ewomaoi Buda an your hews end theP '' -+ ha fixY were the ease aenticat mudshe.had sent I >( make your awn declaone where a'1Le Stara impel,ado.ft have band be had written."him."On idea he bads, 'mama'mad other batter.of washIL' Whit.yov',make o1 liff J E.' r Importance are conemewd, or yearpWWmrgiety,appo"YOU. WnenIacked him doutthiohe said,'Qt'e hard you got loco real tenable.Start :';�gam'i gyyeD�.a..Ppmpg,ay ant peeeWig cards. They.all rue ab4M tiff mer right oakeW Eids1y,im .M.Make teacher l for roue age We Bop- We meAbby, ,ywhat business�lr,hreWrdhn his who the VIRGO GUM.22 to Sept,22) eswbae a vYo r bionesed,Pea'your �,You redly behave_greene, tartly are that i .'It W'k Yea Wkieatk do nom= ooP9 W Deni bkmdak add v a ..X Ff1id.C Bo,d oe cvmu:Higtaer Pere Eng What cam rum yen-mpaent Wyss coma o[Bewepepm).Err + •f a * * ;ever:L diva positions with biGnedil pen Bur,HonweedE8,CellfamW. _ iADHAR FALL.Yom aelghba is obviovab'ro a.Be,out m damming place. 'S to itrain himself eeerching fee anything.He; " with bead our W P.M.Haw fl x s' whatever I.hanth' I amKef that he eM ILe k dehgbMul,tcnflatla time, — 400 GallonsA-Doi have more W comm.dan'M said aW,fiel. IABBA (Sept-29 th Mt. ?2) Needed To'Food Your" '^" dew day'to be with es many DEAR ABBY:I am e.13-yearoa boy wb fed goad Woods a possible-and to tIx W-If hien lived by up egart something that happened. ,f ada.eamakt mw,, ❑ear.W bread dame at a bare edaht- A.&I caseinate M mise called me amna WeMn Promise at me . levet of 2% .Pamela at at U o'c,Jc at night MY motlar answered sheep same lima.Yea dome dogema bread,dry weight,he would re- her what ata amWd b-silk.W hre shout he social Bfkiry andth'a W a cidee-300 aspens of ear" - [ 'good Woe W do eo. lay the amount needed to -na girl said she 1urt.wanted he to&1_oes SCORPIO(0.223 to Nov,217 grow iDe hat bltne Its without eallmg;me a Bre pave. Q v Get bu>B Baal lmporWot a&etre Howse[f r a modern West ' -ABY mother told`.it wam't Proper for.g' Iv buaiess waste;-though Ida em dkt f vegetable matte,' that she bad ever dor it herself,ar&.,girl was,"WY sae, ,dss r sad arwWWedo,row eeeeYe ttqq Plus arnmallt led PmWin th ,:�rcif day I apedughed m Rhegir1,Sher eye about arm..Se ebam5nq andracan Par cepita.water can Parents were set Wat she case babyaRNng with everyave.Then add prey srneptlhn is 250D Sailors a day, aomenne totalk m What,le your op rimed(I age m popWml4y You.¢aim ee- the living, -deF, communed by I .IMn®loa Whet ydeahea alarpl toe,R,lug animal eM DY 0e DeldOa, .R_ .plants It ted`oa esa+' d DEAR MI]®:It 1.am proper fora, a hey.Judgment udg who SAN even ft our ma her d tate uEft rr LAM sv Cm your media ll .. Juedor Editors Qui: on the Stere owe you,rhe.hwa sawcall . a .F 5 1 telephone,mlmout 9untlovke the truer. CENTAURS b* Po , a - ". * ,* .,i e DEng 4 elft Y.gaw'.Tihoug;cy'G f1N'•i How can f rear i.c he odes k hang as m Ler.. w. 1,Years ing fW age o oaks f a v ,>-/ 'Haogag take jobanions she 1 a HWi ed,if +pY - ( 9 { '` at 52 coved ok lob as e:kpess Itrees'H kith C L s! r t' to why not let the tmheppy ,ab g white 7 I , tablet -y, Pa W a, x v t� r She lewd men be a returned, . ted tope. thereby Iry i shime t oll an adoring hurl Intake,na her he the ave ant e.Pchioos-ahe's adaar�nble she cams mak tk'eeypeapk help➢ R -..hy'y 1, a—'- DEAR RRADer Yes}ailed k kke kk q Man one linea her letter I em ashamed. otic 9 salt.W far Fdrv.".net changes note,i 4 .-I any that a ievg as eba,m go atlB areal•a � m ti" 'Wates 4 �a,not. evar'Ymicg,m Bel eM taWIN• h ,e.'y, 'A sWa S >"'Tmlmledi Wak m.AbbY Hex 69N0;ti %Ctdtf'900PJ For a Pe shot reply,Inaoae a of l adiresaed envelope.M I"n I s-sl A'FIGHTING.."" _ *r .moi C For Abby.booklet, CeN'rAUR—tqg Haw k Have a Iuwety{ ,• t rt.: bl k Abby; IN GREEK Rex MM,Yin Ang hes,Calif 80690 CENTM A SCULPTURE,»=.. � APT RCf OV&ST/ON:Ware 1h.4,urk thi g,os seafauaaa ANMSUR.no ccntaw 1.ode of a group of unreal,myth- I T C M led animwe Invented by she hvagWatlora et the peoples w sa 'ACROSS.[ a, as.l t cheat due.Some other ouch m agoative animals were the rani- I.Sopron 29.Sa6Ubrk R E G V R I coeur aha the phcemx. Ancient people seemed to camels.tune, Being .30.:a dthvey A R A R A 1 nembWWg Bu alsoM of men and creatures.-a lee cevkur had d:Sochi 1: ' 31.Cowie:« G I R B o'M t d mea'.head ant threeand a lemse'e body.Such strange area. B:Solt/tad rp 9d'.Telioriam u V R M hndi.IRIM.WkiDeJmalive-tOlde,tly:na.inP.ta.lnva,l-1n.m.Nn-nM. 11..RIVYaWtu'nbds�.�.. OomOmmg'Yte shapes of me¢and cieefurei 'Bre cental¢had 4 Sorb aOM-W A It A`R A a mm's head and accao-�a hese a boat SUM aha 3I C tuu x G I B B O N does Btted 1¢to the atr%tile feln.Sh m nge¢e 8 Soh food - a mum m .q U R X 4 aalac" Moat o it—were d ¢lbea as Mid ave at aM 11 Blxk But there was mu•,tpuned Chiron,who wen civil dcand-able �a`"' ^Yand S M 0 l T ' b act u m ivapneror m Greek her, -Oar Plcpue ahoive o la la ll rco $C 0 v E X S D of iM cmtevn carved 4 marble oo Ue meter pert o[ ahawa ov m. W Ono ,greatng,tha Bartbenm,it,thena It Blaatratea.the",oL a 14 Ulan•r.. 39 R Ided " W E H T X 1 dapalf had dr�a the cmG a�the�pi�ea,lv whicth,h the 1] ��OFF®°" 41 bl F x"SOIUTIOFLOf MT ticalar Le tut N our DIcWre seems[o be galling that wont IN 18.sc IIOA' Fpn }.d;he w]u punva to 6e emovg Iba vlotmy, 19 V aim WM j ylt�. 49.Bill o((ve AIR B•^d.�X'�fe-,6�a�. ilt..�whu bdaYe rnmbloM s2i.Ihic4ntat $3 Bmry " Rdd..v=-A r' September 12, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, Y. City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: .At a meeting of the city planning board held on September 7, 19679 it was VOTED .. To grant applicant leave to withdraw without prejudice on the following; 1. Applicant - Rolarid A. L'Heureux, 14 Pickman Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description — Corner of Dearborn and Walter Streets 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry 1 Book 3029 Page 233 Very truly yours, MP:cc Clerk of . REr,EtyE i# a# alem, cfflttssarhusefle SEP 6 1 34 PH 1? Planning Puurb CITY CLF= '5 QFFICE SALEM, MASS. aliitg �bu Salem, Aassarhusette 01970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. q Salem, Mass. -----------914-------------------19---G-7 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision witbin the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II`A and statq specific reasons) _ ----oxe_ 09 _� Wi e------tiLt--r-----9 _ xQ-P—L;_-t(�1-.e4tt1l--_1d-Sl-------- ------ -- e - -------------S �-In L ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control w is not qui d. 1. Name of Owner -------_ _ -Q_� 11 _ Address — — /_ -1/7, C/ / ►�-- '— — /�—�31P�1t d_SS 2. Name of Engineer r Suurvv,ee�y0A Z_Ul h___ �__ _ �_11_�' _L—_________ Addre�it!id� y 'o4�^^fs - 3. Deed of property records in _____-----------— - ___________________________Registry Book --3 ----------- Page ------42?--� —-- 4. Loco 'on and Description-of Property: _______-_._ ----------___—------_-----—------—___—_____ -- - --------------- ------------ ------------------------- ----1-1-1-1— -- - ---- -----— Old-- — _�--__ • ---------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on t together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner--- Address------------ " = ---- -- ---------------- Telephone Number ___-- —��-0-------------------- September 12, 1967 Mr'; Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the city planning board held on September 7, 1967, it was VOTED - To deny "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan 1. Applicant - James V. Grasso, .14 Myles Road, Peabody, Dass. 2. Location and Description .— Lots 87 and 88 Marlborough Road 3. Deed of prDperty recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 69 Page 17170 Very truly yours, MP:cc er t i �Y# 1f - A4m, fflttssar4usetts =r aE ,may %EP 1� „CIllSA4liM A45S . E CHU �ll �ule�a, �9Ulassncllu¢effs D147D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. . Salem, Mass., ---------------19-6 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and states cific reasons) ________-�__ ________ _____ ______ - �e -- - --------- - --- -- ------ - - - --------- — -- - -and herewith submits said plan fo a determinatiA and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Contro aw is not re ired. 1. Name of Owner L% - — — Address------------ ---- -- -- -- -- --- - — o- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor�`_�_________ Address---_------__ - _ _ _ fid 4 _ 3. Deed of property records in ------------------------------------------------------------------ Registry Book --------------------- Page - 4. Location and Description of Property: --- A - --� - -------------- ----------------------------- --- --- - ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner— — —�lL © --- Address — Telephone Nu r -- s Ctu of Salem, f ttssar4use##s Planning 16oxrb Sohn A. drag, 3r- September 14, 1967 (Seralk T. Aranehg citg Mall Michael Fa,kafnskialem, ,�[aseachxa¢Na Alkert �. �litcnff �agatana�. �$faeeneg Mr. Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Mitchell : Witchcraft Heights - Crescent Drive The developer of the above referenced subdivision has presented the enclosed plan, prior to posting security for the release of lots in this subdivision. Would you kindly acquaint this Board with information concerning • your estimate of work to be completed on this projects and cost of same. Very truly yours, MP:cc Plan enclosed a September 15, 1967 Mr. Augustine J, Toomey, City Clerk,. City Halls Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: We are presenting with this letter, two copies of the revised subdivision regulations for the City of Salem, Massachusetts, prem pared by the Salem Planning Board. Under the authority vested in the Planning Board by the City of Salem by Section $1-Q of Chapter,41 of the General Laws, the Planning Hoard held a Public Hearing in Council Chamber of the Citgg Hall 93 Washington .Street, Salem, Massachusetts at 7:30 P.M., T. D. S. �., Wednesday# May 3l, 1967. The purpose of the Public Hearing wan to give those: people ,1. so desired to express their views on proposed amendments by the PPlanning Board to the Rules and Regulations Govern. ing the Subdivision of Land in the City of. Salem� 'As originally adopt- ed June 1$9 19621,: an opportunity. ,to do� so. 'on June. 15 967, the Planning Board voted on the Revisions all as published in these anno- tated editions of the Subdivision Rules .and Regulations. . Very truly yours, NP:cc Clerk September 15, 1967 Mrs Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerks City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: Mould you kindly attest 'that" the accompanying copies of the " Revised Subdivision Regulations for the City of Salem, are true copies of the Subdivision Regulations,. revised June 1%. 1967? We shall forward one copy 'to the Registry of Deeds to be recorded and the other is to .be sent to the Massachusetts Depart— ment of Commerce and Development. Very truly yours, MPEcc er �- J I �era1D ffi. �IcdIacYhg ' fic!lael Tiaskofoski 0tg pall Albrrt P.Vitcoff - . _ - �4alem,�[assael�nsetts CITY' OF SALEM PLXNNING BOARD �. i' NOTICE OF CHANGE OF DATE } The Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held Thursday, October 5, 1967, will be postponed until Wednesday, Oct- : 196'7, at 8:00. P.M. and will be held in the Board' s quarters at 34 Church Street. m rnmEp MICHAEL PASKOWSKI. Sept . 25 , CITY PLANNING VQAeRR, Oct. ' 6 , 1�0/, 1967 • - - CITY OF SALEM - - -'PLANNING BOARD ' Notice of Cba.nge of Date The Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held Thursday, October 5, 1967, will be Post- - tPoned until Wednesday, October - 11, 1967, at 8:00 P.M.and will be held,in the.Board's quarters at 34 Church Street. NILCI-IAEL PASKOWSiHI ' - CITY 'PLANNING BOARD . Cierk -� Oct. 10, 1967_ - XERO - t XERO XERO XERO DOPY DOPY 'COPY OOPY s CITY PLANNING .BOARD NOTICE OF CHANGE OF DATE The Planning Board meeting scheduled to be held Thursday, October 59 19679, will be postponed until Wednesday,, October 11, 1967, at 8.00 P.M. Sept: 259 1967 MICHAEL PASKOWSKI Oct. 61 1967 Clerk ^.. - oo Le. al (Notices CITY PLANNING BOARD i Notice of Change of Date The Planning Board meeting (, scheduled'to be held Thursday, October 5, 1967, will be post- 1 poned until Wednesday, Octo- ber 11, 1967, at 8:00 P.M. I&HAEL PASKOWSKI - — - Clerk- f Sept. 25; Oct. 6, 1967 J ,f Otg of �alem, tts��cl��t�etts a �IL,m Fns N< �IEIItITik[L� �IIFIX�Y John M. Gray, Jr. September 25, 196'7 .. Gerald T. McCarthy _ CITY HALL Michael Paskowski SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Albert R. Pitcoff - Raymond F. Sweeney Honorable Francis X. Collins, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts ,I Dear Mayor Collins: r At a regular meeting of the Planning Board on Thursday, September 21, 1967, certain items pertaining to the "Workable Program" of the City were discussed. Afterward,the Board voted to make the following recommendations to you. Enclosed herewith are copies of letters from the Planning Services Group, our Planning Consultants, and "a sample application form for "Lo- cal Planning Assistance Program" , issued by the Department of Commerce and Development of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts . The Planning Board feels that these enclosures are self-explanatory. 1. The City of Salem appropriate '$33,000.00 to spread over three fis- cal years, $11,000.00 each year for 1967, 1969, and 1970) , as its share for funds under Section 701 of the Urban Planning Assistance Program. Under this program, a new Comprehensive Plan can be made to supplement the existing plan that is now almost five years old. 2. The City create a new position of a full time Coordinator of Fed- eral Programs . We would emphasize that this position would stress ad- ministration and not planning. The Coordinator could work directly under the Mayor or the Planning Board. 3. The City NOT consider a Planning Department as the Board feels it would be a financial burden to the City, and there is no evidence to date that qualified persons could be found to staff the positions. 4. The City, under the Planning Board, use a consultant for such plan - ning. The Planning Board recommends that immediate consideration be given to the above recommendations so that the renewal of the "Workable Pro- gram" certificate may not be held up. Very truly yours, • JMG:c c O Y/r✓ J07 M. GRAY, JR. , Chairman -� ikrrok �xi�n+o xcno �r O 010 L Pi 1, 18 Eliot Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 UNiversity 8.7300 September 20, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Chairman Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts i j Dear Mr. Gray: i. t I am writing this letter at your request to furnish you with information essential to a decision by the Planning Board, the Mayor and the City Council to undertake the preparation of a new Comprehensive Plan for Salem. Salem needs a new Comprehensive Plan. The earliest reports of the present Plan date from early 1962. The Plan itself is dated November 1963. HUD requires that a comprehensive plan be re- viewed continuously so that it is at all times current and pertinent; • in addition, it should be thoroughly revised at least every five years. i In Salem's case there has been, to my knowledge, no periodic revision of the 1963 Comprehensive Plan and by next year HUD will consider it out of date even if that procedure had been followed. By the time a new Plan can be completed, the present one will be at least eight years old. If Salem requests Federal assistance under the 701 Program, which is explained below, there will be a consider- able delay before the preparation of a new Plan can start. We under- stand that 701 funds for the present Federal fiscal year, (which in fact have not yet been appropriated) are entirely spoken for by ap- plications now officially pending with HUD. Consequently, even if Salem should apply for the 701 Program within the very near future, it is likely to be a year from now before planning can actually start. It is, unfortunately, one of the regulations of the 701 Program that its funds cannot be applied retroactively. A final consideration in this timetable is that the planning period will undoubtedly require i part of 1968, all of 1969 and 1970 and very likely part of 1971. The Urban Planning Assistance Program, (commonly called "Section 701" because of its designation in the U.S. Housing Act) provides a city of less than 50, 000 population with a federal grant of two-thirds of the total cost of a planning program. Application is made by the Planning Board to the Massachusetts Department of Commerce and "�`r'i xizrro C xr.rio Inger I r„7 Mr. John M. Gray -2- September 20, 1967 Development (DCD). The application form, a copy of which is en- closed, itself is relatively simple to prepare, once the Planning Board and its consultant have agreed upon a detailed scope of ser- vices and an appropriate fee. The DCD recommends that one of its representatives discuss the 701 Program with any Planning Board contemplating using it. We recommend that you do this at an early i date. i The, application to DCD must be accompanied by evidence that the j City has committed itself to the program by appropriating all or a j significant portion of its share of total cost. There is a more detailed I{ discussion of this point later in this letter. The application, when approved by DCD, is forwarded to HUD, Region I, in New York for its review. Through• correspondence and conferences, agreement is reached between all parties concerned as to the scope of work to be performed once Federal funds are allocated. During the contract period, DCD exercises a supervisory function, by virtue of the fact that DCD contracts with the consultant and it also contracts with the community; but there is no direct contractual arrangement between j the 'consultant and the community. The only participation by HUD ! during the contract period is a quantitative audit of the contract upon • its completion. f Due to the great demand for 701 funds, in relation to their relatively short supply, all states and HUD have set up criteria by which to de- termine priorities for the allocation of available funds. We under- stand that DCD places a great deal of emphasis upon the date of re- ceipt of an acceptable application, while .determining such other criteria as past performance, relation to regional planning, the urgency of need (that is, whether a Comprehensive Plan is needed as a prerequisite to other Federal programs such as urban renewal), and the extent to which planning, as a continuous governmental func- tion, is accepted within the community. I HUD has recently issued a new regulation for the 701 Program re- quiring that a community with a population of 25, 000 or more must i have the equivalent of a full-time director with responsibility for its continuing planning program. It is my understanding that Salem is considering the creation of a new position in the City government, that of Coordinator of Federal Programs: It is my opinion that the person filling this position could also satisfy the above requirement for the 701 Program. Another decision which the City faces is whether its planning pro- gram will be undertaken by staff entirely, or by a consultant entirely, ',• or by a combination of the two. An extensive and experienced staff is required to prepare a comprehensive plan for a city as large and as,complex as Salem. It is a universal experience among commun- .�"O V I N''rtO I NPgO l )I•Y( gl9'y Mr. John M. Gray -3- September 20, 1967 ,r ities with planning staffs that such personnel are called upon to do many other jobs for the City and consequently cannot devote full time to the preparation of a comprehensive plan. An adequate staff to prepare a comprehensive plan for Salem would, in my opinion, consist of the following minimum without allowance for diversion of time to other assignments: a Planning Director whose salary should be about $15, 000 per year; a draftsman-delineator whose salary would be about $10, 000 per year; a secretary at approximately $5, 000 per year; and two assistants to the Planning Director, one of whom should be a Junior Planner and the other, a Research Assistant but not necessarily in the field of planning. I estimate the cost of such a staff to be about $50, 000 per year. It is possible with this arrange- ment to obtain 701 funds and to offset the City's one-third share by services, for which the City will have already paid in the form of salaries. Although a staff of this size is needed to prepare the Comprehensive Plan, it is not needed for the annual maintenance of the plan or for routine assignments once the plan is prepared. It would then be possible for the City to cut back the size of the staff. As an alternative, the City may use a consultant who will have the staff necessary to prepare the Plan and can devote all the time ne- cessary to it. It is also possible for a consultant to assign a resi- dent planner to Salem whose salary could be paid for by the City and which could then be used as an offset against the City's share of a 701 Program. Such an arrangement would, in effect, be equivalent to using both staff and consultant. It has the virtue, moreover, of a single direction of the planning program rather than a split func- tion which would be the case if there were to be an independent staff. This type of arrangement has been used for some years by Brook- line and Somerville. Should Salem elect to work with a consultant, a selection should be made at an early date so that the consultant can then prepare a de- tailed work program and fee. In this way the Planning Board and the City will know what is to be done and the size of federal grant to apply for. As a rough estimate, and using other communities for comparability, it is my opinion that a planning program for Salem would require a fee of approximately $100, 000. Salem's share would be one-third, or $33, 000, which could be spread over three fiscal years, 1967, 1969, and 1970. The reason for the gap is that the application requires a financial commitment by the City, as I discussed previously. I have assumed that one-third of the City's share will be acceptable as a commitment for the Application. • However, although this money must be appropriated in 1967, it need not be expended (that is, turned over to the State) until 1968. Mr. John M. Gray -4- September 20, 1967 • On the assumption, also as stated above, that no allocation of Federal funds will be made until next fall, then in 1969 and 1970 additional appropriations and expenditures will be required, one-third of the City's share in each year. As I have said, these arrangements should be discussed with DCD. In summary, the following policy determinations and actions are necessary: 1. A decision whether to undertake the preparation of a new : .I Comprehensive Plan. I 2. A decision whether the necessary professional services should be provided by local staff, or by a consultant or a combination. 3. A decision whether to apply for 701 funds, regardless of which choice is made in determination # 2. 4. Application filed with the Department of Commerce and De- velopment as soon as possible. 1 Sincerely yours, i on auk I � MBB:ml i i j i I' i t { i I i I I -"1 k6nU kCRpI J m +n APPLICATION • �y LOCAL PLATTPTING ASSISTANCE PROGRM Massachusetts Title VII - HOUSIDTG ACT OF 1954 Department of Revised Jtne,1966 Commerce FROM: and The Planning Board of Development Community Name e f Prepared by: Name Title Address Telephone No. i NOTE: 1. This application will not be reviewed by the Department Iunless it is accompanied by a letter from the chairman of the Planning Board, a copy of the proposed program and j Tabular Summary recommended by the proposed consultant, and an affadavit from the .City or Town Treasurer stating that the municipalities' financial share of the proposed program is available. 2. The enclosed budget will establish the maximum amount of funds available under a contract to be signed by -the Department and your Board. If your community will not appropriate the full amount a contaact may be negotiated for a lesser amount. This application does not bind your community or your Board in any way. Approved by Planning Board Date Chairman Proposed Consultant Secretary Name • xr,_r?o xrno� ti I. P;ST PL!u li 4G P.ROGRIIIS: f Description othe elements- of the Overall Planning Program completed for the Town to date is attached as Item A to this application including implementation of recommendations by the • Town or City. SAP"TLE: A description of the activities of the Overall Planning Program completed to date iz as follows: ITEM ORIGINAL LATEST DATE REVISION C01dSULTANTS ]l1PLMMTTED OF STUDY DATE IF ANY PH MS A. Subdivision Regs. B. Zoning By—Law 9. Base Map D. Building Code E. Master Plan ---••------------------------------- Breakdown of F. elements of G. plan that have H. beanr.implenented-F I. J. II. PRESENTLY PROPOSED PLUM11?G PROGRAM: The description of the activities of the Overall Planning Program proposed under this contract is to be known as the "Scope of Services" and is attached as Item B to this application. III. FUTURE CONTMTPLATED MAIMING rROGR1)P,4: The following is a listing of planning work contemplated subsequent • to the completion of the presently proposed work program. IV. .PLANNING BUDGET FOR LAST FIVD YEARS: ANNUAL BUDGET SPECIAL APPROPMATIONS FOR STUDIES,IF ANY 196 $ 196 a a 196 196 $ 196 (Current) V. URBAN RENEI7AL ACTIVITIES: A. Do you have any bad or substandard housing problems?Yes—No B. Has any work been done on an Urban Renewal program? Yes No Iden#fy and describe the nature of any Federally assisted urban renewal activities that are currently in progress or that are contemplated by the municipality,e.g.,Title I Project,Community Renewal Program,General Neighborhood Renewal Plan,Demonstration (Section.702 Public Works Planning).' C. Identify and describe the nature of any planning activities related to the physical planning of the assisted municipality that have been or are being financdd or for which financing • is anticipated by Federal grants from other Federal Agencies or programs,e.g.,Bureau of Public Roads( 1-g%Highway Planning Funds), Community Facilities Administration(Section 702 Public Works Planning). _ q'Y �:''I Y' • VI: PROPOSED PROGR:IN ( checkin the appropriate column) ITZI C 1MV ' STUD' REVISIOAF i7T1I:i ER IN I CONSULTANT WILL PREPARE: of I ORDER OF STUDY & STUDY & iMAPS I EXISTI111i =ORTAYCE FOM1AL I REPORT FORT STUDY REPORT BOARD USE 1. Inventory Surveys i a. Yaps I I b. Land Use ! i c. Population d. Delineation of Neighborhoods j e. Economic Base f. Other f I 2. Community Facilities I i Studies and Plan j a. Schools b. Recreation 1 i c. Other Public 1 land and j buildings j 3. Circulation studies I i and Plan a. Streets and ! • Highways ! b. Off-Street parking 4. Utility studies I ! and Plan a. Water b. Sewerage i I e. Drainage 5. Area of Influence I i I Study a survey and report or part of a report I on planning and dev- elopment problems and! conditions in the I surrounding and adjacent area that might affect i the program of the I i municipality. i 6. Future Land Use { j -3- IY.r_ro xrrio xeno - xrrxo' 'crn=r ; r.nir onr ,r.ory�. - ...�.w..v�..+..+...r+i_.Smr '.:C..'_...�..__.�..v..- .�.:_. .._....r.._........L .... '.....�.�.._....__.+.-r.v.,.s».i��-.._._....��._ -+'_.:....:1�......0 .�_�.�»ur' ITM C i IEW REVISION,IuL71BER IN i CO":'iSULFTAri WILL PRI ARE- 7 'SSTUDY of jORDS, OF STUDY & STUDY & PUPS EY.ISTING,' Ii` 0RTAN01 MIMI, R•,"rORT ! STUDY j REPORT/ POR • t BOARD USE ST. Effectuation I Programs a. Zoning By—Law b. Subdivision Rations ! j C* Official Map d. Capital Budget I j I ! 8. Special Projects a. Economic Dev— ! elopmentProgram ` I b, Neighborhood Analysis 1. Delineation of f I neighborhood ( j areas and ! i boundaries I 2. Information on housing conditions 1 j including location ' and extent of blight or potential blight j 3. Characteristics i I families affected I { • by poor housing. ! j 4. Information on conditions in I non—residential areas including location and i extent of blight i I ! or potential blight 5. Adequacy of Coma— unity facilities and services,both 1; ! i public and private. + 1 6. Causes of blight I 7. Identification and Priority of steps ! needed to eliminate present blight and j prevent future blight New programs of the 1 Housing and Urban j 1 Development Act of 1 1965 including the I Open Space Land j Program2 Urban j Beautification P ro— eementgram Code Eh£or : (1 I Program and Demolition • Grant Program in addition; to other federal and state j Programs shall be considered. ! 1 �_ t Ixrno �xrool —4— �wcwo; i ;d vnrr nu+ r ff :.w y I I I ' I ITEPd C I N-9:7 REVISION 1dt@ll3:sR IN COTdSrTLT.a.T WILL .HEPAR..: i iSTUDYj of ORDER OP STU91 & STUDY & MAPS E%ISTING� liTPORTAIMIE 701x.LAL R.OPORT Fm. STUDY REFORT i BOIQ USE I o. Other: ! i ! Studies pertaining to a planning pro- J+ gram of a specialized nature that would included within a t total program accord'- I ing to the nature ofk the comrunity involved. 9. Master Plan Report { I VII. PROPOSED BUDGET: A. Estimated time for this project 6 12 18 24 (i'aximum) Months (please circle one) NOTE: This time will not start until federal approval is obtained and contracts are executed B. Does community employ any personnel who is qualified to work on this program? ,ves no Title of position C. Budget: • 1. Salaries and Cages (a) Local technical personnel . 2. Contract Services (a) Contracts for professional services i 3. Other expenses (a) Reproduction and publication of essential reports and documents v _ (b) 4. Total estimated cost of project: $J * Costs for office space, equipment, materiale,supplies, utilities, communications and other costs of a regular and continuing nature are not allowable. 5. Amount of federal grant requested (..4ax. ;a project cost) VIII. ANY PERTIJEN'T INFORP.ATION ON TRIS .PROGRA;d NOT REQJPS i:: -?1 THIS FORM. • -5- zl I%r_Ro ap, �,..'o lxrzrr � xr�o� I nl'Y ,COI`y ° (�tt ` M1Eltt� ttggttL11SEs September 20, 1967 john �[. drag, fir. (5eralb Z. 'Adlar* (atg Pall �licllael'vaskafaski '*alem, Massachusetts 'Albert?a. Fitcaff �agmnnb �. a$fvemeg Honorable Francis X. Collins , City Hall , Salem, Massachusetts Re : - 1967 Capital Improvements Program Dear Mayor Collins : . We are handing you herewith, printed copies of the 1967 to 1972 Capital Improvements Program. This Program has been prepared by the Planning Board with the assistance of the Planning Services Group, our consultants . • We feel that the preamble in the report explains in detail the purpose of such a program. Although this report was printed a few months ago, we have with- held distribution of it because the information shown for the School Department has already greatly changed since the printing of the Pro- gram. We recommend that you now distribute this information. At the present time , the Planning Board is preparing the report for 1968 to 1973, in which all estimates for all departments will be revised to comply with up to date cost figures . Very truly yours , JMG: cc JOHN M. GRAY , JR. , Chairman L 12d_4654 Tempt Tb.sf eii �, �/ STirwaei�} SACH �5- 6/4 arL Abp VI-4,,r it To T4G /`-7idy02t At 7 ro,! 42 -`I 4-w-o 4_C A-irV Q- r4 T6 C-�1_SS_&-t%/Lu -- �✓G�:_C A.A rb t �o iz�_�_m_3_c�4- •�•__ryC- rL f Po ,Z r_ _ l;k ani r /y e ,c --T v G -amu R�-�f C--ax -r u --Q - _--- -- ---- --- —"-t,-r_�I u u_.6 k _-1'./uS._/?-4./�-u--R�' G✓�f_��?e ii i'Z O u_rC __r_ac_—/ d�[�rs_r r_o w— _S/r_a u �, _��[—r_wC___J__c_<• o�— _ ----/'-��4 7"'4_G_ . -o f_—_/22�_C_g.v •r,_,_ -_�7/t—R_C-C-o-n.-.n G b p---T b"�--%-°-u-'v_°-w- --- ---oi -_--f-�-re-f-G.b r T!r_h.C.—TSL G. �n it[t•H_G . --- -���4h—l(�/zG��_e�-y C- rd•c- .�.RCp o-R.r _ ,r e_2 _/5C8_ra/9 �3 �1�_ t✓���Gw---- - - •-- -- TC'- -_CQrI.`iS_Sr__�✓�ra--LF' - rO 2.t_rS.--CO-rte JCICu_�.45:. - r _ ` ,\ 7M1 .___�_____ T _..�____:__�1___-__.� _.__�. _.___._ . . ____-____.. -�_--�_._-_ _. ____.Y__ __-_ _.-_ _.__..___ __. _._.�. -�..__ _. ___ _ _______�--..__._,.-__-r-__��-__._____ . ____ __.___-_______ _____�.._-__.___�.___-___._-- _ .. _. ____.____ ___._. _ _ __� �_ ____..-_ __�___.r_-- I . _____� '. � - _. ... __.. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ .. _ - �� r + C to of 'Salem' Ms ttcl��toe##s A N 7 'I3 > 4� AI.l1N.141\l+Ll .SpYNLY It��WIVEVQ" 11 444111 m �YY September 27, 1967 @044 0Jr.. 05=Vr (6eznta t'LI. .Li'[zQInzfh� f{icfenet neknlnski (riittl pall ,Albert ditcnff �ulem, lE Z5ac11uDelts �Rnnmsna �j. P fneeneg Department of Commerce & Development , Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Cambridge Street , Boston, Mass. Atten:-Mr. Fred Fallon. Dear Mr. Fallon: The Salem Planning Board is considering the preparation of a new Comprehensive Plan to take the place of an existing Comprehensive Plan that was issued in 1963-1964. As the Board is also contemplating applying for Federal funds under the 701 program, we would appreciate it if, at your convenience, a representative of your department could come to Salem to brief the Board and other officials as to the requirements of the program. As suggested by you yesterday over; the phone, we would welcome you tentatively on either the evening of October 19, October 26, or November 2, 1967- We would then advise you as to the exact time and place after you select a tentative conference date. Very truly yours, JMG: cc ' (J N M. GRAY, JR. , C AIRMA _ V IXl_RO N6R0 NI:Ro „_p0 Il 01 1i.arr� t�, rI i OPCtlGG TypC � uA .LrA .� - �Gcv Cu�.Gf rc Q <c n,Gm 9G.ec .44,-,0"Cop �rI__�O�"N <2CC A0 t/Colt ckur'trrt -- - ----- -- -TC-__SLE'G.Grh l C A_4�✓�liC- ��!/tD-_l f Co!✓L°_<R.r,Es_�—r_M4--_ -- ?G_p A iZ A r!0 a --d-K ---A/C.V_�a r+, R L K [-i�!u(—�?^_4 ro _-Tn KC rli4c - �— - —CN-C_/,o �2_I>_f✓ __!(CS°--CUyr��Cnrei.C—1Ppcty- aC - /4- Z ¢f-P,,r1-24RIP_Ra _m_ G2A - -C 4JavL - c.l -- D_- 0 u e <_a a u f-m G-a CL.- 2.G---r.r rut o f-- ---y u_rr2_- �ti�.t_!LL✓+�,_G.4-r- -C.0 u_c._»e�r_�.G—!u_-_ _it c C,h.,moo_ r3�Z,/_LF rbt--- o R r_c_G---- y au _y Gcr't�n�y_o_u�2 ra6- --- -_L✓_LC.GG�'+G. -_%o UrC.t1.t�i.U_GGy--�Ry _—t±�C---G-IJ f,�r✓u G--O-R -- Gro 9_G_R-1_S�_ .� c ra B42 --2-c:—,i /a -- 4Z_.__C_j oucv ra <v _.112u_�s_c _yva r r&.argria E_kACi riJYt_G .4NV p(,AG�dFT�2�.au -SGcCCr A_!.. GOa�G¢GHLt_-lJ.�rG-. ---- - - _ _ ____ _- --i- - - - - ---- - - - ---- --- --- THE PLANNING SERVICES GROUP • 18 Eliot Street - Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 - UNiversity 8.7300 may` September 22, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. , Chairman Salem Planning Board 54 Raymond Road Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: On the assumption that the City will seek federal funds under the 701 program to prepare a new Comprehensive Plan for Salem, I suggest you contact Mr. Fred Fallon at the Massachusetts Depart- ment of Commerce and Development at a very early date. His • telephone number is 727-3197. The DCD administers the 701 program for all communities in Mas- sachusetts and it therefore appreciates being consulted for its ad- vice and assistance on the procedures and regulations governing the program. ,Sin yours /ort n B. raun MBB:ml September 28, 1967 Mr. Neal 8. Mitchell, City Engineer, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dearr'fMitchell: Weare forwarding herewith a subdivision plan of "Heritage Heights" which has been filed with the Hoard by the Di$Sase Re- alty Trust. A public hearing will be held on this plan on November 29 1967• lie kindly requewt yourzcomments and recommendations in con- nection with this plan, after you have had time to study same. Very truly yoursp Mp:cc Clerk pl September 290 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, ' Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on September 219 19679 it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described plan - 1. Applicant - Boston and Maine Corporation, 150 Causeway Street, Boston, Mass. 02114 2. Location and Description: - Parcel of land fronting on Ocean Avenue, containing + or - 2725 square feet 3. Deed of Property Recorded in South Essex District Registry Book '311 Page 12 Book 2173 Page 344 Very truly yours, MP:cc Clerk Planning Poarb 34 Qlhurch 56frref FORM A Salem, ttssttcljusciis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Bost � , Mass., ---------------;zeptember__ll_,------196Z_-- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant _______Boston_and Maine Corpo-ration-------------------------------------------------------- Address -______-----------------_---__-_-__-__--_ - Address -------------- 02114------ -------- ----- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor------ ng!r, Qf_jgig ____--___-_________---______ Address ---- --- same -- 3. Deed of property records in -------------------Essex_(,South­l-----------------Registry Book 311-------------------- Page ---12------ 2173 344 4. Location and Description of Property: Beginning_at_a_point_located__N_ortl-1_7201811.5"-_W st 41.59 feet from Station 819+61. 28 located on centerline of location Portland Main _____Line- ast) stun_Division,thence_rrnning_I4nr_th_22_°__181__15._'_I3leat__9._43_feet_to a point; thence turning on the sideline of Ocean Ave. ,so-called, North 16° 16'45" East �IL_OZ�eat tA_a_ oinLthef}ce_turning_and_sllnniIlg_along-land-£_Stephen_A—&Dorothy A. Rizzotti,Northt-36'45' East 121. 25 feet to a point;thence turning and running along land of owner unknown South 58°20139"East_17.1B fee t;thenee_turning and running along land of Boston and Maine Corporation on a uurve to the right having a radius of 2823.68 feet a_distance of 123. 45 feet_thence turn 9- South 25. 03145"West 44. 05 feet to the point of beginning, be all of said measurements more or less,said parcel containing an area of about 2,725 square feet. BOST N AyyNDANE CORPORATION Signature of Owner -------------------- _-_(vs 0-/ ------------ �^^ Address --------------------------- -ay__Sta_.BoBtou�--Maas. 02114 R3-I3- 23 h Q S�c��1ie� A ` DoYor��y ,�izzoC�iJq am �o V n) cN O N23 36-45E- �} e/6 454 ti_ izi.2s I o�su/ N�6 u 50.02 ,,Z7REA=L 2725 t5s Fr R 23.45 y I 525`03-�5I✓ 2.2x23..68 Bos�ora ax ������e Coy�orc>z'�o�v � Q o N 0 / V �Q oS�o/�I�tr1/SGo� - - - --- /� To>s9e>r ,Ex e� ed✓Y25�03�- ��,d-=> iz��POYq� t/»dPPff>e S�6dLi'isco» Cave�rot �i�u> >Lo� ��rii>'Bc� H OF May SaZetK ptafssscsc� ./,3ot�Y� a���,r �yc I-` THOMAS - v H. �Qftc'r #4d32 Lffi f 4332 SAL eM, MX S .S. o e �F, �� � aTSUR�ptt BO.S 2zorz��CIIfL� CoY�ota Ecco S z�e��y z z o iezi 047 Ole �x9r ofDe-T4. Sc¢te /-20 ftil 1J`67 5\ "�6616133 9z X/¢ .. September 29, 1967 mow.... �.� Mr. Augustine Lt Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Ss,lem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board held on September 219 1967e it was VOTED: - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law not Re- quired"on the following described plan: to Applicant - Donald and Dorothy Ronan* 2 Dane Street, Peabody= f 2,.` Location and Description: - Triangular piece of land, containing 1441 square feet abutting the turn around at the end of Witch- �1 r ; epaft Road 3., Deed of Property Recorded in Essex South District Registry ook Page Very truly youes* MP-.cc Clerk 0 ` BOORUM & PEASE " �zT ►Rff r FORM A RECEIVED APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT ' OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL SEP I8 10 22 AM '61 File one completed form with the Planning Board CITY CLtn:�'S OFFICE and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., . September 13� 1�i7 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant q.Donald and Dorothy Ronan Address p. .Pea.boft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor . .Cr4i2tet, and, ,Towers Address .6. Fairview Avenue, . Swampsxott, .Mass 3. Deed of property recorded in . . Soath East District , . , . , Registry, Book . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Location and Description of Property: Triangular piece of land, containing 1441 square feet abutting the turn-a-round at the end of Witchcraft Road, as shown on site development plan known as "Witchcraft Heights, -Section H. Scale 111=401 , June 14, 1967, and shown as Lot 133B on plan to be provided, with access through Lot owned by Donald Ronan, et ux, to Wall Street Court. Donald and Dorothy nonan By Their Attorney Signature of owner . Address 2 Dane Stree P ab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ssachusetts September 29, 1967 Mr. Augustine Ja Toomeyi. City Clerki City Hadi Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey¢ AVtallheeting of the City Planning Board, held on September 21; 0057sj it was VOTED'- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law not Re gVired" on the following described plan 1: Applicant - Mabel Drolet, 86 Federal Street, Salem 2. Location and Description - 84 Federal Street, to divide parcel into Lots 1 and 2 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 3219 Page 514 Very truly yours MPacc Clerk RECEIYEO,�it of azlem, la na r4usetts SEP Z I 3 53 PM '61 lxriniztg uxrD CIT SALEM,KMA5SF1C$' � u - Salem, lBflaesachueeHs D197II FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. ' The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then'one' copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall he typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., --Setember_21,,_-------19---6Z To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) __The---'ttdo._dtntl t,._'?nga,---mumbe,TL'CZ__$4_and� ' _ped r-}1_–_______ .__Stzee-t+_�Snlem+--were-_standing---tFoa__the__-tract--of--,land-hemin--in- --VD1VBA.--PZi0X--tc --- he-- Qar_19Da-----ther c>�e_same-does not ---stitute_a__sub-t vAsion.--vrithin_the-Man ing--of--Sec --.11-A--------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ----------14abel Drolet___.______-________ --------------------------------------------- Address---–-----86_Federal__S treet_,__S alem__ ------------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----Edwin T_.__Brudzy-A0 –------------------ ---------------------- – Address___ _269. Lafayette Street, Salem --- -- --------- ------------- --------- 3. Deed of property records in .......E88gx_SOuth_DistriCt-___--------Registry Book -- 3219 – – – Page - 4. Location and Description Descriptionof Pro�p-�e-r-t-y-: 84 F 4Fdecc�d--e-rraml__FSratsir>ezest---,---nS_-i`c-l--eL=t 77 /_7%E4 /ira----�-f------------- --------------------- — -------------------------------------- azc — — —e__ _� �P___c� ------------------------------------- --------------------- —---------—---------------------------------------------------------------------------—-- ------ ---- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. a 1 Drolet, by her Attorney= Signature of Owner A= P?- . Charles F. M nning Address-_27b--Fssex-Stmet r--Sal e=----------------------------- Telephone Number --------745-0261___________ Beginning at the Southeast corner on the Northerly side of Federal Street as shown on a plan entitled " Land of Mabel Drolet, Federal Street, Salem, Mass. , Scale 1 in.= 20 feet- Aug. , 1967, Edwin T. Brudiynski, Registered Surveyor;" Thence running S 71-OOW by Federal Street, a distance of 10.60 feet; Thence turning and running No - 24E by Lot No. 1, a distance of 23.75 feet; Thence turning and running N 17-17-30W by Lot No. 1, a dis- tance of 26.03 feet; Thence turning and running N 88-04W by Lot No. 1, a distance of 11.30 feet; Thence turning and running N 13-57-OOW by Lot No. 1, a dis- tance of 38.17 feet; Thence turning and running Southeast by Lot No. 1, a distance of 8.49 feet; Thence turning and running No - 59-30-E by land of Lillian B. and Charles M. Brackett, a distance of 18 feet; Thence turning and running N 2-57-30E by land now or late of John D. Pope, et al, a distance of 60.43 feet; Thence turning and running N 69-06-20B by land now or late of John D. Pope, et al, a distance of 48.48 feet; 4 Thence turning and running South - 24W by land now or formerly of Francis E, and Eva Fournier, a distance of 175.77 feet and to the point of beginning. , �i#u of '$ttlem, �cssttt its l yr a Planning Poarb SEP 1 d 12 38 PH' 'S1 CITY GL'Ln`V' OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 @Ilpurh Street FORM A Salem, 'Massar4usetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ---------------S-eptember_15,------------1967-__ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- this-par-ce-1--shows-adequate fronta_qq _-_____this_parcel_shows_adequatefrontage both Salem Salem and_Palmer Streets„_ ublic ways, and the only purpose of the plan is to show existing structures on t7ie land w�ich has been owned b-y__tha-present-owtners_and-their_famil y since-1920-• ---- ------------------------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ---GeWge__Ankeles,-Attorney------------------------------ Address ---11_-Pe_cbody__Sgslare, Peabody,_Massach-usetts.--------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor---Edwin__T_x_Brvdzy_nski_________________ _---__________ -_ --_ Address -------260 Lafayette Street,_Salem. Massachusetts---------------------------------- 3. ______________ ___ __3. Deed of property records in ---------------fssex_Soath_District---------------Registry of Deeds Book --2-139----------------- Page 305-------------------- Book 2465 Page 228 4. Location and Description of Property: __Ihe__land_wi_th_thQ b li Idings thereon situated_at the_______ _intersec-ion_af_Palmer and_Salem Streets_,__._____________________________________________ OWNERS: Irene M. Audet, Germaine C. Audet, Roger H. Audet, Henri J. Audet, and Clement R. Audet. By their attorney, —� - ' � Sture-0f-Bweer --------- ---- — --------------------------- • Address _11__Qeabody Sq�re,_P_ _y- abo_ ,__Massachusetts______________ r -uxn 1 k September 290 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomeyw City Clerk City Hall, Salem# Massachusetts Dear Mr., Toomeyr At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on September 21, 1967; it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re quired" on the following described plan - I. Applicant -' Irene M. Audety Germaine C. Audetp Roger H. Audet9 Henri J. Audet, Clement R. Audet. 2. Location and DescriptinA - Land on Palmer and Salem Streets 3. Deed of Property recorded in. Essex South District Registry Book 2139 Page 305 Book 2465 Page 228 Very truly yours, MP:cc Clerk �F s " Tity 0f "S,ate YC, assachuortts Office of tiie (9itg Oak �u$us#ine�_ ffiamne� CHU QIlu4 pom e 1 mb 3 (Iffita Pull October 3, 1967 Planning Board City Hall Salem, Mass. Dear Sirs: You are cordially invited to attend a conference of the Committee of the Whole in the Council Chambers on Thursday, October 5, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of discussing the following: (1) the Capital Improvement Program (2) authorizing the Planning Board to apply for Federal Funds under sec. 701 Urban Planning Assistance Program (3) the employment of professional consultants under sec. 701 - Urban Renewal Assistance Program. Ve ruly yqurs Copies to all Members AUSTINE J. / sent 10-3-67. CITY CLERK �/ October 11, 1967 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: This is to certify that I have this day received in hand notification of a public hearing to be held before the Planning Board on October 11 , 1967 at 8:00 p.m. relative to the final approval of a 'Subdivision to be known as "Witchcraft Heights III". Very truly yours AUUSTINE/J. TO' CITY CLERK, OF SALEM • GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW WASHIN TON E . MASSACHUS STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 RES., sa PLEASANT STREET TELEPHONE 744-2172 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1105 October 11, 1967 Mr, John M. Gray, Jr. , Chairman Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Installation of Fire Alarm and Police Boxes Subdivision - Witchcraft Heights Dear Mr. Gray: This is to advise you that I have contacted Fire Chief Brennan regarding the installation of fire alarm and police boxes in the Witchcraft Heights Subdivision and have assured him that my client , Mr. Ugo DiBiase, President of Salem Acres , Inc. , who is the developer of this Subdivision, is ready and willing to install said boxes as soon as he is furnished Wit-W a set of plans from the City Electrician. Pursuant to my conversations with Chief Brennan, an appointment has been made between the Fire Chief, the City Electrician and my client to discuss this matter this afternoon. I will inform you of the outcome of this discussion shortly. Ver truly S� , / / �TO �E P/� VALLIS , TORNE FOR SALEM ACRES, INC. GPV/ijp tl r ' .. L. � . -....-�l . _ :.ru. ._. a.«:w.�.�w.--•.Itualv..:�w:as�.vc ..a.l.. ....w......w.+.jj k GEORGE P. VALLIS ,1 ATTORNRT AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 R6a..as PLEASANT alp 6CT TCLHPHON6 744.2199 OALQM• MABaACHUSC 6 _ T[LVHONa 74A•II0p k October 11, 1967 ff P Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Application for Approval Definitive Plan, Submitted September 7, 1967 Witchcraft Heights III Gentlemen: In behalf of the petitioner, Salem Acres, Inc. , it is requested of the Planning Board that the following requirements of the Subdivision regulations be waived. 1. Section IV A (2) (a) "The minimum width of street f rights-of-way shall be 50 feet." f It is requested that this requirement be waived and E ' that the petitioner be allowed to construct street rights-of-way of 40 feet. A waiver of this require- ment would greatly minimize the amount of ledge blasting which will have to be done and the 40 foot street rights-of-way as shown on the proposed plan will conform to the existing 40 foot street rights- of-way already constructed in the prior Subdivision of Witchcraft Heights I and II. 2. Section IV A (4) (a) "Dead end streets shall not be longer than 500 feet." The Board will note that the dead end portion of Gallows Hill Road is 560 feet long or 60 feet longer than the limit specified under the rules and regulations. The reason for this change is to take advantage as much as possible of the topography in the area in ti<' that an attempt was made to locate the turn-around F on a relatively flat area. '� uOwO .. �OOPO _ ORO aq- COPY4 ,.��.�. . ... ....:i � r+�6a:...-...;.�.:..._--...-.� �=� w..-.,.....:..,--�....,W.L. ...••:..�o�..�..vw'.L::x..1... �...1L..a.......,, '. Planning Board -2 October 11, 1967 3. Section V A (4) "Granite curbs and gutters shall be f installed not closer than 36 feet face to face." It is requested that this requirement be waived and that the petitioner be permitted to install bituminous (I curbs not closer than 28 feet face to face by reason of the prohibitively high cost of installing granite curbs. It is respectfully submitted that virtually every development in the Essex County area contains bituminous curbing with satisfactory results. It is hoped that the Planning Board will consider these requests for waivers and act favorably upon them. Ver trul yo r , G RGE P/ VALLIS TTORNEY FOR SALEM ACRES, INC. GPV/ijp i n ` -COPY r I ABUTTERS TO SUBDIVISION ENTITLED: "SUBDIVISION, WITCHCRAFT HEIGHTS III OWNER: SALEM ACRES, INC. , DATED JUNE 19, 1967" Country Shore Realty Trust 74 Andover Street Danvers, Massachusetts i LEGAf. NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING Gaston C. Lemire Final approval of subdivi• i 4155 Frontenac P. Q. slon to be known as Wlteh- ++y - - i craft Heights ,111 located off St . Hyacinthe, Canada Gallows Hili Road and Rock. 7. dale Avenue. I Section SIA 4o 61J, Chap- City of Salemter 41 of .the General Laws. .INotice is hereby given to all Interested persons that the ��.-y J �: i Planning Board will hold a 1 1541@m- res; Aire c h[�a,�I ,L- N ilE,lh� hS1111'11� i c k1�f' 3� 118 4 E Mr. & Mrs. Johh kelley Street, Sa!'rm, Massachusetts, y .I. on October 11, 1967, at 8:00 Gable' s Circle pm. relative to the final approval o.' ;he subdivision known as Witchcraft Height Mr. & Mrs. Charles Sansone i M. Salem, >fa_ssaehusetts. ;. SALE-NI ACRES, INC. " Gable's Circle Sept. 27; Oct, 2. 1%7, Mr. & Mrs. Raymond Page Gable' s Circle Mr. & Mrs. William Sentner Gable' s Circle i Mr. & Mrs. Clarence Chaklos Gable's Circle Mr. & Mrs. Jerold Laurie Gable' s Circle I Mr. & Mrs. Richard Scott Gables Circle r i XERO XCR0 NERD XERO ` DOPY RROI+Y na •_ COPT t GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW • 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 R95_ 33 PLEASANT STREET TELEPHONE 744-2172 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1195 October 11 , 1967 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Water Run-off Problem Witchcraft Heights Gentlemen: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated September 29 , 1967 regarding a water run-off condition brought to your attention by Mr. Robert Donovan of 23 Gallows Hill Road. • Please be advised that I have discussed this matter with my client , Mr. Ugo DiBiase, President of Salem Acres , Inc. , together with his engineer, Joseph Carter, and have been assured that the conditions described in Mr. Donovan' s letter have been corrected since the problem existed in February of this year. Since that time, the property in question has been graded and seeded and it is the opinion of my client and his engineer that the run-off condition has been alleviated. With respect to the other matter raised regarding the problem existing at the intersection of Valley Street and Gallows Hill Road, please be advised that my client intends to install a catch basin in that location in the very near future. Ver tru yo S ,, RGE P. VALLPS TORNEFOR SALEM ACRES, INC. • GPV/ijp September 29# 1967 George P. Vallis, Esq. ' 70 Washington Street, Salem`p­-<Massachusetts wxrx Dear Mr°:: • September 29, 1967 Mr. Robert M. Donovan# 29 Ga&lows Hill Road' Sale p-Massachusetts Dear Mr. Donovan We acknowledge receipt of your letter of September 19t 1967. We have sent a copy of this letter to Counsel for the developerp and asked him to attend to the matters complained of. We have asked the developer thereforet to advise this Board by the date of our next meetings regarding progress in remedying this situation of which you • comp1V---ThfR * '« Verrp truly yours, Mptec CITY PLANNING BOARD$ CLERK • September 19, 1967 23 Gallows Hill Road • Salem, Massachusetts REFERENCEa Planning Board Meeting Held in April 1967 Water Problem Witchcraft Heights John M. Gray, Chairman Salem Masa, Planning Board 34 Church Street Salera, Mass, I attended the first part of the Salem Planning Board Meeting in April 1967. At this meeting a letter from the City Engineer, N. Mitchell, was read describing the water runoff problems being experienced in the Witchcraft Heights subdivision, In addition, several residents spoke, including myself. The Planning Board directed the Contractors consulting engineer, Carter & Towers Engineering Corp. to meet with the City Engineer and detail their specific recommendations for overcoming these water runoff problems. Since I have not heard anything since this meeting would it be possible to apprise me of the action taken and/or to be taken concerning these problems? In the course of the discussion at the April meeting I pointed out the problem of melting snow and the high volume of water resulting that flows from neighboring properties. The contour- of the land is such that considerable amount flows out _• over the sidewalks, however, the largest proportion flows behind several homes prior to being diverted out over the sidwalk then into the storm sewers. The particular problem associated with melting snow occurred at my home in early February resulting in considerable water flow under the basement door within lid hours. " On the day of the subject Planning Board meeting a sill was poured to overcome this potential hazard. This summer I have taken further action to prevent water from flowing too close to the house. I am in the process of re- landscaping around the house, providing a wall around the base of the porch and essentially redirecting any potential flow of water near the house, This of course will not alleviate the total problem as the proparty_adj'acent to mine that is owned by Mr.' G. Irving receives a large amount of. water by way of a dirt path (roadway). This path was bulldozed out during the original construction for movement of tools, materials & equipment to and from the job site. This path acts as a collecting point and diverts the water over this adjacent property, resulting in a ficai of water over my backyard and out over the sidewalk and curb line. In addition to the above, I would like to know what action will be taken to rectify the problem at the intersection of Valley Street and Gallows Hill Road. This problem, too, was brought up at the meeting and I should imagine is refer- enced in the minutes of the. meeting, 1 would like the information on the above and what action is being taken by the engineering firm to overcome the water control situation as it has developed. As you see from the foregoing, this is of deep concern to me, not only now but in the near future. Donovan ' " _ cea N. Mitchell • City Engineer Salem, Mass. A -- z4e (Qommonftrealt4 of 2Hklassar4usetts • LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH BUREAU Room 230, STATE HousE,BOSTON,MASS. 02133 Members of Council TELEPHONE: 727-2345 Sen.JosnPx D.WARD of Worcester,Chairman Sen.ANDREA F. Nucxnoxo of Berkshire Sen.JOHN F.PAREER of Bristol,Minority Leader Sen.ALLAN F.JONES of Cape and Plymouth Rep.JOSEPH B.WALstr of Boston,Vice-Chairman Rep.STEPHEN T.CxMuR of Holyoke Rep.DAVID J.O'CONNOR of Boston Rep.RAYMOND F.Rounxe of Lowell Rep. SIDNEY Q.CuaTiss of Sheffield, Minority Leader Rep.HARKMON CmAnwrcE of Winchester August 23, 1967 Rep.BELDEN G.BLY,Jr.of Saugus Rep.ARTHUx L.DESROOHER of Nantucket Legislative Research Bureau DANDiL M.O'SULLwAN,Director SAMUEL Baown,Assistant Director To the Chairmen of Massachusetts City and Town Planning Boards Gentlemen: By joint order of the General Court, the Legislative Research Council A has been directed to -- . . .undertake a study and investigation relative to the • feasibility and implications of restricting the zoning power to cities and county governments with particular emphasis on the possibility that the smaller communities are utilizing the zoning power in an unjust manner with respect to minority groups. . . to determine the possibilities of legislation. . . (Senate, No. 933; adopted by the Senate, March 13, 1967; adopted by the House of Representatives in concurrence, April 6, 1967). Our report, by tradition, will be factual and will neither advocate nor oppose legislation such as that suggested by the above study order. Aside from its "anti-discrimination" feature, this order raises substan- tial issues relative to (1) state standards for "reasonable local zoning, (2) regional planning authority vs municipal home rule considerations, and (3) the need for home sites for low and middle income populations displaced by urban re- newal or other public action. Accordingly, we would appreciate your cooperation in completing and returning to us, at your earliest convenience, the enclosed questionnaire relative to the zoning policies of your community and the views of your board in respect to the important issues raised by this study directive. Any assistance you extend will be much appreciated. Very truly yours, Z • Daniel M. O'Sullivan, Director Legislative Research Bureau DMO/aad enc 1. r ti LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH BUREAU Room 236, State House, Boston, Mass. , 02133 • QUESTIONNAIRE RELATIVE TO LOCAL ZONING PRACTICES TO MASSACHUSETTS CITIES AND TOWNS Name of City or Town Answered by (Name, Title, Agency) _ Date 1. Does your municipality belong to a regional planning organization? If so, please give its name. 2. What is your board's view of the proposition that local zoning powers be • limited to: (a) Cities and Counties but not to Towns? (b) Cities and regional planning districts? 3. What is your board's view of the proposal that a state board of appeals be established with power to review and approve local zoning regulations, and to apply uniform state standards thereto? • -2- 4. Does your community have an official or informal "fair-housing" committee? 5. Have any formal complaints alleging ''anti-minority" uses of the zoning power been made against your community since 1962? If so, what was their nature and disposition? 6. Does your community contain any low or moderate income public housing projects? If so, please indicate briefly their nature and scope. 7. How much area in the community is zoned for multi-family dwellings and apartment buildings? Is this area now fully utilized (i.e. over 90%)? 8. How much area of the community is devoted to small-lot (10,000 sq.ft. or less) home sites? 9. What is your board's view of the proposition that state law ought to limit the minimum lot size which city or town zoning regulations may require? • I -3- • 10. Has your city or town been willing, in recent years to adopt zoning changes in aid of low or modest income housing in your community? 11. What is the present population of your community? 12. What is the estimated maximum population of the community, possible under present zoning? 13. Please indicate your schedule of city or town building permit and inspection fees. • 14. Please complete data in attached sheet for each type of zone now authorized under your zoning regulations. Use additional sheets if necessary. • -4- • 1. Restrictions on Maximum Building Height (a) Single-Family Residence (b) Multi-Family Residence (c) Apartment Building 2. Floor Area Ratio Per Lot Area (a) Single-Family Residence • (b) Multi-Family Residence (c) Apartment Building 3. Minimum Floor Space (a) Single-Family Residence (b) Multi-Family Residence • (c) Apartment Building 4. Minimum Lot Frontage (a) Single-Family Residence (b) Multi-Family Residence (c) Apartment Building 5. Minimum Lot Size (a) Single-Family Residence (b) Multi-Family Residence (c) Apartment Building 6. Building Set-Back (a) Single-Family Residence (b) Multi-Family Residence (c) Apartment Building 7. Approximate Percent of Municipality's Surface in Each Type of Zone • y of $Ulem, gassachusetts �r • Planning �Ruttrb z,s 34 lfihurrlt �ifrtrt AQairm, Mnazarhuartto SuptenbW28, 1966 Register of r`eede Essex South District Registry of Deeds 32 Federal Street "&lent Massachusetts Dear Sir$ The condit.ton referred to as Note 6 an a plan entitled Subdivision Plan "Witchcraft Heights" Owners Salem Acres, inc. , dated January 290 1965 and recorded in Essex South • District Registry of Deeds,. Plan Book 104, Plan 35 which recites that, "Lots 1 to 29, inclusive and Lots 89 to 97, inclusive, shall not be built upon until adequate drainage and sewerage is provided to the s:,tisfaction of the Planning Board" has boon complied with. Permission in therefore granted by this Board to Salem Acres, Inc. , to commence building an the said lots subject however to the conditions as set forth in a Protective Covenant dated May 18, 1963 and recorded in said Registry of Deeds in Book $2779 Pager 269. Would you kindly make a note to this affect in the rocorda of the Registry of Deeds. Very truly yours , GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS REE.. 93 PLEASANT STREET • TELEPHONE 744-2172 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1199 September 28, 1966 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Witchcraft Heights Salem Acres, Inc. Gentlemen: With reference to my client' s request for removal of the restriction as noted on the Subdivision Plan entitled, "Witchcraft Heights" recorded in Essex South District Registry of Deeds , Plan Book 104, Plan 55 which recites "Lots 1 to 23, inclusive, and Lots 89 to 97, inclusive, shall not be built upon until adequate drainage and sewerage is provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Board" I am pleased to report to you that the City Council has approved an appropriation for $2100.00 for the purchase of 36 inch concrete pipes to be used for replacement of the present inadequate drainage pipes funning from Mansell Parkway into Proctor Street. I wish to bring to your attention the correspondence from the _ City Engineer , Pfeil Mitchell, who indicated his disatisfaction with the existing drainage system due to the inadequate 16 inch pipe running from Mansell Parkway into Proctor Street. In view of the fact that my client is ready to rectify this situation as soon as the pipe is supplied by the city, I respect- fully request again that the above-mentioned restriction be removed so that my client may obtain the necessary building permits for the lots affected by this restriction. I enclose herewith a certified copy of the Order from the City Council together with an instrument which would serve as a Release of said restriction and request that it be signed by a majority of the Planning Board. // n V y truy y Vrs/. George Vallis V"7 • GPV/ijp Enclosures K ��GOn 04 O � Catty of "ittem, assarhuutts w..'° •� �CEt#YtLiII �E�1c�r#riTPIC# 9f41"NE Ooa' Jv4n ;4J. �Bttrrg, Jr- 6Q Cn1�ttr#Pr #rPP# Otg pedrician �a October 16, 1967. Salem Planning -Board,, 34.: Church Street, Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: Enclosed find sketch of the Witchcraft Heights subdivision, showing" proposed locations for Fire Alarm boxes. Fire Chief Brennan and I are agreed that this layout meets the requirements of the Sub-division Regulations of 1962, which apply to this sub- division. If you concur, will you so inform me. I will then:notify the developer to, proceed with the installation: At a meeting last Friday with Mr. DiBiasi and his attorney, . he agreed to do this workincluding installation of Fire. Alarm .-Boxes, cable ,and 'related :equipment to meet the City Fire Alarm lines at the intersection of Summit and South Streets. Yours truly, ity E ric an 00 - A'7. M1 1 y " orir 3 5 L 130. - IDr - a - 9s - ISS 94 ID 9 Ive . - - - 17 134. '- 139 , Q`I IB' � IVY � 136 k ME.-) Fl 137 <O93 to O IYs S 139 - YO 17 31 It Q 17 91 N 39 IY IYY Y lY YY it IS G' IVO 90 c 37 a8 1Y7 F 142 141 lo) 3 17 V 10 B9. 34 is 1.4 ICL 9 ISS I49 H .. - LL �o ?IS; too 7Y 31 V toy )) t 73 33 $1 3e 154 Iso Ie7 l$ 111 87 95 - YB 3 159 1S1 H 6v to lel loo 99 98 80 BI 81 B] 84 at 7L 38 Ve - 79 GIlo 95 3-1 : YIA Isa - '.. .. _ Ws /1111 R 0. 51 ®. .. q °op -L] Li- LI LO $9 $Y $Y $l S$ $Y $7 [3 Yy _ a Y944 c 111 Y $' V P r 113Its Y l - • COV VI )S.R f SLIC YN �QYC] . w�i CDaldvon Hel4kt5 !..19. lao 131. Ial Q Ft 1S a '" Salcm 1 M8,55 ` r 4 ✓. 11'1' IlC- 115 IlY 119 )$O •'I" x. ,. �x.4 , ` ' t ,. ' F,✓�'E xffL�`1/�iYI l'30xy r OtU of ora, i�G.�i.4,f eC f rr�,p�1/ y,yµ�yy/, yyyYY'Cf.�'£. A44tN.L4µy{ YN`� Tohn&M- Mrnp, Jr. - October 24, 1967 f�ernlD aI. ,91HcQInstl?p '044uel vashofnshi THU�inll '�.16esf�2.�Jiicoff �nlem, ,if{nssnel?useiis �npmonD �. �fneenap To the Honorable City Council, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: Re; -Street Fire Alarm System, Gallows Hill Area. We acknowledge your request relative to the street fire alarm i i j system at the Gallows Hill area being developed by Salem Acres, Inc . , Our investigation showed that the contractor has been waiting for final plans from the City. The final plans have been delayed be- 1 •' cause the system is being amplified to include additional Civil Defense and Police Signal systems primary wiring that was not included or called for in the original plans. I Very truly yours,, JMG:cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, CHAIRMAN"' 6 J �J xr_rro xreo rrn�l xrnol, oony ,rr, rv 'nor r0 4 t .— - _ _ �-✓ t__1) C CC//-U_C✓_G._C�G_G,— o u it—_.'.L E r rG�P _O P C L r rC_2 �i'�_ --.--—L—�C r_— z—/ 4 C 7 -—/,v _- (J 1✓i Ct/___�-o_u E./i_C_C_o S L..p---"--'2L_6LG S--~ --- ---- -- ICLAroti c._.—ro—T4L S�'CC<ELi/ZG—'f_C.it iL an Sr_<iy -- -/Ir r,4f$------ - _..C>�2- / 7� u,4fC � Ga rI_6[,, - -5/I_u_4J_C.G___T_4Ar _T/,�G_C•u/._i-llnc�U ?— N?_S—�L-Zii G!_�.iTLi G--F°2---f'u�[�L_2a f/�-2_o_rr—c,�cC�T y_. /✓�— —_• RE/N_C__./"•L6nlllLr��-c_a -_i_.o_/V_C_Lu/>GA/7lJiTlO-a�_L_ —�i_ 4,'iL_!/Cf.Ca_f. G---- -- Nom_ zi -C_e,.o_p_w_—.Q2_Ge_c-C-Gn---f` R -ivN_ry_ ,� ,.. ._• _ II- -- - -- ------ - -- -- _- - --- ------- --------- ---- -- -- . . -_- ----------- - -- - -- ���-- ,---� I a of '�$tt1em, 'Mttssar4use##s • �' Office of the (fitg Clerk �lugnstine�. IIuomeg Qlitg QIer4 22mmMs i Una a caite u October 2, 1967 Planning Board City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sirs: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, September 28, 1967 the enclosed Order was adopted and approved • by the Mayor on October 2, 1967. Very truly yours AJT/hc ! A19 TM . OOKEY Encl. CITY CLERK • Fong C-10.62-IOM CITY O F SALEM 9T 4 In City Council,;������?„��._19�Z ( u RY � ?FCIMII.'Z➢fin!` !, I, C2. ' I I' j j '1 In City Council September 28, 1967 j Adopted APPROVED BY THE MAYOR on 001 N i $ AU�USTINE . lb�lEY ATTESTS C CLERK \�� j I I i i 1 • jxruo� ���oj r Taut 0f �$Ulr ' Acmear4usett8 �• 3A �t�Y.�' � stet " FY2TI1 frog IIMYa October 24, 1967 Gtralil T. arinrillu - �{icllael �asknfoaki QIdu�inll Albert�i. Vifraff �alrm, �{nsanchvaeffa tuumanil .'Sfvrrneu Frederick A. Fallon, Director of Planning Assistance, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Mass. Dear Mr. Fallon: Thank you for your letter of October 11, 1967- In this communi- cation you indicated you or a member of your staff could meet with the Planning Board on October 26, 1967. I must inform you that I have been requested to meet with the i City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting on the 26th, so there will be no Board meeting that night. Our meetings are usually held on the first and third Thursdays of the month. If it is possible for you to attend our November 2 meeting, we shall be very pleased. The meetings are held at 34 Church Street and commence at 7:30 P.M. If this is inconvenient for you, please let us know which Thursday would be agreeable. Very truly yours, JMG:cc /. / /� /Z/ti/ w1i CITY PLANNING BOARD, „CHAIRMAN ' XERO XEgO %F_RO %ERo loop �GOVY ` lOP� lOOPTI .. 1 Tifu 11f "Salm, fflassar4useffs 4 21 6 ,`�Jnlln X139. �irng, ,�f r. October r 9 7 (beralD Z. Br(ffar ft �fficl nel nahnfnahi TTHU pnll - { Albeit P.Vitmff Anssudlnutte �RapmnnD . 9fneenell -; Mr. Richard L. Banville, 81 Valley Street, Salem, Mass. , Dear Mr. Banville: ^j Your letter to City Engineer Neal Mitchell has been referred to the ;i City Planning Board. I can only repeat what I told you at our office on the evening of October 11, 1967, that this Board or any other City Department has no jur- isdiction whatsoever on problems such as you present. However, a couple of days after your presentation, a Board member inspected this site . It was determined that this gully was a natural one . In other words, this was not a condition that developed because of improper design or construction. I also must repeat that the Planning Board, under the provisions of Chapter 41 of the General Laws, Sections 81K to 81GG inclusive, (Subdivis- ion Control only has control over the layout of streets, including side- walks and public utilities within the street lines . Other than to check the size of the lots so as to determine that they comply with the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance , the Board has no jurisdiction over the development of private property. The Building Inspector in turn only has jurisdiction over the con- struction of the structure , including utilities and to a lesser degree fin- ish grading within the lot . As far as we can determine, this gully is a natural one and was never touched by the contractor so the Building Inspec- tor has no powers to order the developer to do anything. We hope you can understand the City can do nothing in this case . This matter is strictly between you and the developer. -j Very truly. yours, I. JMG:cc Copy to: City Engineer CITY PLANNING BOARD, - CIAIRMAN ` Building Inspector ( / Ward IV Councillor Butler . �. George P. Vallis RERO %ERO %FRO CONY v r"Y I --/v c.�G_ -L`„1P"�-�c•v.G 6-`---.ya_t-_�G.�.ri RGA�._�4.U_- -T° ---r��G _ C. i r T ---- ---y'//�r --Tli�s --- ����G__ _,_s+R_..t1�y _-a_PyC..£' C, <ry _�/fP�,e�n•,Lv ` --- NAS - ,vo_ _ /�Qr_sLoicr. o v -- wi✓_ , P 5o_Gvc.rZ. o��_/�2G3G_G�rtc-S�w_�S_- -- -- }`ou � ?Cl�yi•:- --/:�u[JGu (,�t�—�- -moo u/aLG—D_6_ _7dy4_LtFrGR _yuu R /__, %.2Oyi---A, _ cif R�--- itfa PC.4- -lUfp[.C.rt�-7 /iG—SirG , /_r ednf /./i..._.4nr �^L- ---OiF-G.....—_.�✓ _p T1{<R... /✓o22f ru!-f-1.� =�-s _,��r _eL__ _co�v�).�rr� o�i__j_G��2CvCtQ/?co_�'3�Ckts��-- -��-i��.Qo��K_.-4_G//._r_�cw--O'�----C-G_NSr'2�Lr! o^-1 •---- -- - - --- _(J_ O�. Zo__�-ui✓_� Ge-- a_d- _fe-oti<__ � L_e�_Gr-,ZpLJ --04e:C Cr, tc2 r46 S/ Zc - -t--Q-r5_-50- - Ar--cc- o C_rE2M T4�r -----/I�l. /L✓._/_MU_M- - 2C__4_v.��L_ rrr�ur� v_/.__-rli<- -�QI�U<_C_ C. !,�ta, 44Ay<C-�-- r4-�- --- t F y p e q OA,ZO--- Nuc - _�/p _ _ /vRl_fr-[.Cr. a_ti _ euGG f4f.- --- -- - --0� - IJPIULu4rG _ �2o�G2r-Y ----- - — -- --- -- - - /,r -�vsUoi4-c— /s'/'-c,cr_�_R- ry _ry t2u_ o>✓cy _ _ -�l�C_._✓_.rir2L-f..o �! o_kO-yGR--TtiG--L_O_k!_CRut�iori _._-a_C---r_r�_� wer-zitG-�--1oc-e�2U�C.-__U-r /rrGfLitI9--r6 if---/�/jGG-SsG2— _fF_rlgi.faG_/G'A�ruG4v_rT/Irv_ - TNCe-or,. 1LC.TCQ/�'rFc - -_ .7-kiirG'GG[ Y ?It --- - 4-- N-nrulZaC =° 4C- Alvo GJA < . A/Cv4Z -rG_u_evGo-_- _ R_Y -/-aF CO4iTe,Acrotj ._ __ Sa--- -- TuCu1c.2i+/C �^r��lcraR 1:/A-� N � � ewCeS_ ra__azoGe ._N/.0 r/a/pC, - you CA4- -U</ D( J2SCA_4a.__�ii _ - �r �Y GAirr__ _Oo- ..No_rNr.vC --l_v Trr G f --- x - Aap._ 81 valley Stseet Salem, Massachusetts Mr. Neil Mitchell, City Engineer 93 Washington street Salm. Massachusetts Dear Mr. Mitchells I ase property at 81 9allet Street (Witchcraft Heights lot 135). Going than the rear of my land is an open drainage ditch; which when we brough the house; believed it was to be filled in by the builder •DiBiase•. se has now informed us that he has no intention to fill in this open ditch: May I protest against this farm of deceit by hini, and request that the City of Salm; ask (or malas) DSBiase cover up this man made ditch or not accept the easement right he nar has until it has been corrected. This ditch needless to say is very dangerous to the many children as the neighborhood. Thank you: Richard L.Banville OPEN SWALE SHOWN ON ORIGINAL PLAN , 4 81 Valley Street Salem, Massachusetts 5 Oct 1967 ' Clerk, Planning Board Church street , ,. Salem, Mass. f Dear sir: I own a harm at 81 Valley Street (lot 135 Witchcraft r' ,.-Heights) and going thru the center of my back yard and of five of. my neighbors is an open drainage ditch. It is my understanding that the present location of this open culvert was ft by "DiBiase"the builder of Witchcraft" Heights. . Why then'was it not recommended by the planning board that it be covered up why has it been left open' ;pnattented, uncleaned, for the neighborhood children to hurt thenselves.1 M I have spoken to several city,officials about .this open culvert and NO one seems . to be able to give me any answer as to WHY an OPEN ditch going thru six yards in a subdivision. (with 17 young children in these homes.) Y This open ditch is very dangerous as the Board of Health, the Mayor, Water dept. and counsellors know by the phone calls from mothers whoes children have fallen in or hurt themselves while playing around it. It is a "wonder" for children, it seems to have an attraction to them. w DiBiase does'not care,nor doe's helhave-any intentions to do anythingn to this < ditch. I believe along ,with many of,my neighbors that.this ditch should netrer _ - ..;, . ... � c •_ • � - fir :; •-. , . have been left opan. IF it was an oversight by the Planning Board, I request that the City of Salem -14wDiBiase clean and cover it up before,we have 's fatal accident with one of our children. I would appreciate a reply to this letter; thank you, chard L. Ila 4� s' CHU of �$ttfem, gassar4use##s . Skf'GG.pNF,VU�~ � Aµ�wsw.wy{ �QN1•� . � .. jalln,0d. (Brag, Mr. N October 25, 1967 t' l �era1D�1. 11 dgarthg �lirhael vaehufnski Quip�inll Albert fit.F8roff 'Saie,a,"Massachusetts papmanD A. "fneeaell To the Honorable City Councillors, i:- City Hall, j. Salem, Mass.' Gentlemen: Re:-Funds for Professional Services for Supplementary Comprehensive Planning j On September 25, 1967, the Planning Board sent a request to Mayor ,. Collins asking that an appropriation of $33,000.00 be made as the City' s f share for consultants ' fees for Comprehensive Planning under the "701" program or the Urban Planning Assistance Program. ' If approved, the funds appropriated would be spread over three years, �. 1967, 1969, and 1970, as Salem' s share to pay a consultant to prepare a new Comprehensive Plan to supplement the existing plan that..is now almost five years old. Our consultants, The -Planning Services Group, who are preparing the forms for the recertification of the 1967 Workable Program have informed us that the HUD officials have informed them that the city must show ev- idence that all such plans will be kept up to date periodically before the Workable Program will be recertified. This entire matter is more „ fully explained in the Planning Services Group letter dated September 20, 1967, copy of which was previously sent to you. We also wish to emphasize that the recommendation of a Coordinator of Federal Programs has no direct connection with the request for funds for the "701" program. I. I£ you wish, a representative of the Planning Board will attend the Council meeting on October 26, 1967, to again explain the recommendations. i Very truly yours, JMG:cc l CIT PLANNING BOARD, - AI14AN Copy to: Mayor Collins .1 City Clerk All Councillors Board' s Files (2) l , 1 YCRO MEHO - � %FRO OOPY e. r 1 -- - ------�-- --- _C- _/__.v p✓_u_S/_-'.F v a. 2 o f q —--- – --- _—_ —— — ---- -1?-�/-4-4.ri a-- ----- [� �l b Cc tN fes�'' Q_C/L/_4 G T�✓S—Cf��fZ.rt�itL/ PIO h_o_,t ��Q O V, °0 -_ — P�- rn.��6- pf T4G—C_✓_r._�=S --f/�� z4— -,r-a— --Cc✓,r�I-c_rirr �r oz - g Le-tr-✓r_ur_L �Ist«�/_r,ce_-��z.ctC-4�-rte,— ------ I ��P/,e�Parw acv _-__-✓J __Ciok_f✓cT.�Nr__-TD /�2G�pRG—A_N-ft✓_--� l? - --- ----G�.=.ti{----�._S4-S_(GL-�A_e�Gt—__�i C---�LayN /NG "-2.l�i CGS �P�u✓p. �� _--bus,o it12[ 7!{)_SPA_2EN/ C TLC f- Zn,6 a_C—Y4_G_!L_GC-GZl'�/Z�G-� �41P_T-ke SC2— L C,PI�ZO-.G-A-ni+z—N-&&LC---- 4,1t-01? Ch -ag - Ul/ l9FFrC ,(-44f _ Pil4.16 /NF4�.LhC-i9_ lbCr+� 1�. �_(' _T_/✓e -- TTL�4 --G!/D_Q.Kd.�f_C_f:_/_RsL4 �Rnt_—LdL't.c_ RL 2CCCl2 !'eF �LD - -- -- — Trr Cv1',o C41Arrc/rl rria/zC - IuLLA,—Q - -- y_��%Cra�_$t R��..0_ I_4.`.:� �f C c�y,—_4✓ti<-t_r C,!_�L--�_'2_L,.U_�_G+�f'_c�-- _C-Cooh _m_d1rDt,_e• eo�—ore- __d am�2.� �.tvnsd—R—o.r j`GnfeeaiL — ----��/Z_L•-GQe9en_r_-._NA.fes—_a_a--�_!2_C_.cJ ___�-o�&_4" r o G�_tj -..__ -----��� �.�.vrn-C---��.t.t,a t�.iL_c .tsst�._ei�r�� �ou�s�. —�► ------------ u._4_S!4G_u._!�-�------------- - ----- Nr „jr 1 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR'S OFFICE, CITY HALL pa:gI1SF V h FRANCIS X. COLLINS, MAYOR THOMAS M. GRIFFIN Eveculiro S.cmtary September 28, 1967 To the City Council City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen of the Council: i The Planning Board has recommended to the Mayor the use of professional consultants to develop the plan under #701. The board feels I that due to the shortage of qualified persons and the financial burden to the • city that.a Planning Department is not warranted at this time. Accordingly, I recommend adoption of the accompanying order recommending employment of professional consultants. Very truly yours, FRANCIS X. COLLINS, MAYOR FXC/ah Enc. Form C-10.62-101 r °'Tt CITY OF SALEM -f S Se tember 28 67 In City Council,________ p _ .. _ _ _____________19______ ����IAnNF.UNr Be it resolved that the City Council recommends that the 1968 City Government creaPthe oosition of Coordinator of Federal Program- • In City Council September 28 1967 Laid on table; Councillors O'Keefe & Marquis recorded opposed. In CLty Council October 260 71967 M ti -to take from table ynted; EMOTMTON adopted, APPROVED BY THE MAYOR on ATTFST: UUUS'1' 1v J . TOOMEY CITY CLERA 1 i , I r•�r,rr c—ioczaou CITY OF SALEM ' 111 ���I:.;> � r.•r � 19 In City Council September 28_ r' • r Ordered: r That the Planning Board is hereby authorized to aPPly for r edoxal funds under section #701, Urban Planning Assistance Program. • Refer to Coradttee of Whole In Cit/ Cotmc3l October 265 1967 Adonted APPROVED BY TAE MAYOR on r - A GUSTrl%E ATTEST• — Mw • . jirnol _ µ4"• Form C-10.62406[ - �� CITY OF SALEM Ckri z 1 .r' r In Cit Council September 28 19 67 ,. y ______________ _ ___________ _ al.Nixf. Ordered: That the sum of Eleven Thousand ($11,000, 00) Dollars be and hereby is appropriated from the "Excess and Deficiency" account to the "City Planning Bpard Department" new 'tem "City Plannin Board-Section 701-Urban Planning Assistance. " In Cit- Council September 28 1967 Refer to Connittee on Finance In City Council October 26 1967 Adopted APPROVEDOctober 30,,,;a90,7 dAUGUS - m / ,TOCA'II'_ ATTEST I I Forth C-1062-IOM w �' CO\nITA C I'T Y OF SALEM V 0 C Y � a In City Council,..___September 28 lg 67 pfaR11FE Ordered: That the City Council hereby approve employment of professional consultants under Section #701-Urban Renewal Assistance Program. In City Council September 28, 1967 Refer to Committee of Whole In City Council October 26 1967 Adopted APPROVE By THE MAYOR on October 30, 1967 AII STM J - -- ATTEST: i 0 CHU of ,Salem, fflttssat4use##s ;I � �Irnutin$ �nttr� VJohn P.Graq,fir. October 31, 1967 ' � 03eraID ffi. lfl�IcQiarth� i; 4MChael Fa¢holuski 0tg Mall Albert P.13itroff - $Ulem,08058c1lueetto ' Fallmoub 71. 11ilueenell Board of Health, 5 .Broad Street, Salem, Massachusetts Re:-Plan Entitled "Witchcraft Heights III". Gentlemen: The above referenced plan has been presented i. to this Board for approval. fr Would you kindly arrange to convene with our Board members at our next regularly scheduled ineet- f' ' ing to be held at 34 Church Street on Thursday, i. November 20 1967, at 7:30 P-M- P to acquaint this Board with your comments and/or recommendations with regard to this plan. i I Very tru ly yours, MPicc � � cLc��Ci �t21 �Yrc Clerk i f: XERO XERO NERO DOPY QOPY - t`OPy %EROS COI-� i Wwa fluty lnf J$ttlem, 4Ittssttthuse##s Hohn A.(brag, Sr. October 31, 1967 ' lSeralD ffi. �IcQIarthp lichncl nskvfnski 0tp Pull '€Ukeri ?Pitcoff �nlear,�Isssnehuse8s �npmonD�. �fneenep - . Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts F Re:-Plan Entitled "Witchcraft Heights III". �- I_ Dear Mr. Mitchell: I44' The above referenced plan has been presented to this is j. Board for approval. 1 , Would you kindly arrange to convene with our Board Mem- bers at our next regularly scheduled meeting, to be held at C 34 Church Street on Thursday, November 2, 1967, at 7:30 P.M. Ih , . to acquaint this Board with your comments and/or recommenda- tions with regard to this plan. Very truly yours, MPD.c c Clerk " I a XRRO XRRO XRROj r ' Qo1,Y 1`OIaY i ,j. • November .l, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomeys At a meeting of the City Planning Hoard, held on October 11, 1967, it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the subdivision control •Law Not Re- quired" on the following described plan 1. Applicant - Salem Acres, Inc. , 71 Hancock Street, Everett, Mass. 2. Location and Description - Lots 7 and 130 Witchcraft Road- 3* Deed of Property Recorded in South Essex District Registry Book 3270 Page 84 Very truly yours$ MpDce MICHAEL PASKOWSKI, CLERK 1 f�ttg oftt1em, ttssttctxse#t� 9 Planning Poarb • 19"5 PA �alaur, �i$laesaelTuse#ta Q397D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL LLJ 'e 0 t In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the > In = applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- LU .�� mission for such determination. The notice shall be `.�kh attached to two copies of this Form A application. w The notice and both copies of the application must h w be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ____September 25;________1967 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) --- 1ari_Ghows---a---rearranyQmet��__ofIha—d3y_ii-s-ion---lin-e___ • between _Lots 7__and 130 for=_the purpose of erecting a house _on____ Lot 7 in accordance to the zoning_ laws These lots are part_of - -- ---- --- - ----- ----- -- - _asubdivision previously approved_by__the__Planning__Board}________________ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ------Salem_Aeres,___Inc.------------ -------------------------------- Address 71 Hancock Street ,__Everett_,__ Massachusetts ------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Carter__ ----------_---___ Address 6__Fairy_iew__A_v__enue.,__Swaa >scott,___Massachusetts __________ 3. Deed of property records in ___-Essex__South_District _____________ Registry Book --- 527 — — -- Page ---84----------- 4. Location and Description of Property: — —---_-----___—__—_—_------------_ Lots 7 and 130 on Witchcraft Road. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - --- -------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Pl gether th a ames of the Owners of the abutting lots. SAJJM A RREF INC. AI • S'gnature o, Owne eY' ...... �— ------------------ Address — — tiE R P. VALLIF Address_7Q_Washington_St reet1__ alem=__Mass.________ Telephone Number ------------744-2172 November is 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerkp City Hallp Salemp Massachusetts ' Dear W. Toomeys �Y ' « At a meeting of the City Planning Hoard$ held on October ll, 1967# it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described plan - 1. Applicant - Sane Nolan$ 2 Chapel Roadq Danvers, Massachusetts � 2. Location and Description r Lots #22A and x`228 Hillside Avenue 3. Deed of Property Recorded in South Essex District Registry Certificate of Title #31313 Very truly youral MPacc MICHAEL PASKOWSKIi CLERK Ctv of �$ttfm, assar4usetts Flaming Puttrb CHU �lall �ulem, ,�lassacltusetts D19711 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: ---October_---Z+------12fi7--- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ----I,IIt&__22A--_and__22St_—----—------ ------------- illsi3e-AvP►111P ---____-- in Ward ___fIIUL________----_____-------------____ (insert street and street numbers here) Signature of Owner --- /L .�!tm� — — ------------------- Street Address ------ -------2__ChVe _Road --------_---- City/Town&State------__-Danvers+-Maasachug-etts__-_0 .923--__-_- Telephone Number -------- -2._7__X135__________________________--_--__---------- L � RECIg II �I�EIki� ?S58�tC1tSES OCT I I IO 08 AN 161 (xnnin$ curd CITS OFFICE SALEM,\MASS- QIitg gull 'Salew, Anzaachuseits 01970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form. A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass-- ------------IIGtobe.E----7-r----19-j6'7- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) _- Ullside__Avenlle__has___b.ee11__131d---Out-as---a_-walt__an---a_ -recorded--p1an--slnce-1319-s---the--lats_h"ve--- J_--4t1l1t-i4 --ts---the---- .1at_1i ne___texcept__seyaers_)___alld__the__lo_is__san_meeh_State--.regulations -for---sani-tart'--d-i sposal-systems--------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner ----------------Jake_ialan------------------------------------------ --- - ---- Address---------------2--Cha¢lel--Road+--Dan cess.,_-Massaehusetts---------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Address-----------------260__Laf_a-yatte--Str-eet-,---Salem,--MassaChuzatts 3. Deed of property records in ------------Sszex__Ssnith_4Sstr1,Ct------Registry -B- ---____---------_------------------- Page Certificate--of Title #631313 4. Location and Description of Property: ------Typo_-E@xtEjin_—],qts-_.pf—_13nd__SLtuAte--- ----- ----on__hillside--AVexsue-_in_Salem------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners ' of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner-- - __/v ---------------------------- Address_-_---------------2--Chapel---load♦---P__aav_ers_F_ Ha -aA_ Telephone Number __7_77-01-3 ------------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS SECTION II B. Respectfully represents your petitioner, Jane Nolan, that she is the owner of a certain parcel of land situate on Hillside Avenue in Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts. That she does not believe that any approval is required under the provisions of Chapter 41 of the General Laws of Massachusetts (Ter. Ed. ) as amended for the reason that the parcel of land which is sought to be subdivided is situate on a way which has been laid out as a public way and has been shown as a way since 1919 on a plan numbered 856-G filed with Certificate of Title #2926 in the Registered Land Office of the Essex County Registry of Deeds and being shown thereon as Lot 422 on sheet 1 of said plan. Said Hillside Avenue. has been used as a public way for many years and that utilities (with the exception of sewer lines) have been installed in the way previously referred to and on the plan filed herewith and to which reference is made. Your petitioner further represents that she will have no problem in meeting the standards for individual sewer disposal systems promulgated by the State Department of Public Health effective August 15 , 1966 and that with the exception of the land that is the subject of this petition, the area is build 9p and that she feels that this petition falls within the purview of Gen. Laws (Ter. Ed. ) Chapter 41, Section 81 L as amended. Respectfully Submitted Jane Nolan r ' COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS k I C/ 1 • �� ,.'. WILLIAM L. MAHONEY, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW 81 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 „y November 1, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomeyp r» City Clerk, City Halli Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the city Planning Board, held on October 119 19670 it was VOTED - to endorse "Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired” on the following described plan - 1. Applicant - James V. Grasso$ 14 Myles Road, Peabodyg Mass. 2. Location and Description - Lots 87 and 88 on Marlborough Road 3. Deed of Property Recorded in South Essex District Registry BooK 69 PAGE 17170 Very truly, yours, MPscc MICHAEL PASKOWSKI9 CLERK s R E C F.I y� 0 2IIEltt, US82IE IYSE $ OCT 1 I I 02 AM 067 FI g �R°ttrb CITY OFFICE SALEM, MASS. Qilaq �li �alem, ,�Isssachnsefts D197D NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED T0,.:.- r .. FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten _ or printed neatly in ink. Date: ....... --- City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01910 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accom anying lan is located at _ ___ _ _ _:_:______ 49— �yv�6f�2a-- in Ward ------------ — (insert street and s et numbers here) Signature of Owner /l�--< r Street Address —-------------- Ciry�Iown&State F— �- ------ — -------------- Telephone Number J__C_l_- ---- tI--------------- ----------- —--- ---- so RECUVEO Ttt 1 Q �ilEtTt, 2t88FtP lt$E S 7 Z II 02 AM '6? l[axlmng Poard 617 CLEM;,�S OFFICE SALEW MASSe ftv tau ,$uleny Iassac!?usefts II197D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass. Y To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. 11-A and state specific reasons) ___�_ � ---- -----P-- ------ �- O ----l�r------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is nootLrequir d. 1,,;, Name of Owner r --- - - -- - - — - - -- Address____-� ___ - _ - - - / �df--------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surve o Address-------- t '---------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ---------___ -- -----------------------------------------------Registry Book �r l----------------- Page ---- 4. --4. Location and Description of Pro erty: - - - - (/ 1 - - -- ------ --- - - - - -- 0 --- ----------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Ow er-- ---- - ----_--------- Address 1 01q� d�d(ELdO Telephone Num a/ ----�--------eT------------------------- V November 1, 1967 Mr, Augustine J. Toomey* City Clerk* City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey; At a meeting of the City Planning Board* held on October III 1967; it was VOTED - To endorse ,"Approval under the subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described,�plan - it Applicant - Elmer H. Warner, 10 Salt Wall Lane, Salem, Mass. ' 2 _, Location ard' Descri titin 144 North Street lot contains one P � 9-family dwelling and one one-family dwelling 3!. Deed of Property Recorded in South Essex District Registry Book 4o47 Page 121 Very truly yourep MPnce MICHAEL PASKOWSKI, CLERK J E " —KR-^n" ® BOORUm aPEASE " ®.srE�R" CUIi#V of ttXPm, ttsstzc u$Pt#s • y��� �IMYilttYt$ �uttrD ' QIitg �aU Salem, �IassatEtusetis II1970 V a U.,. NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO Q Q QN 045° FORM "A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for cc a C XAC complete instructions for filing: ev „as d I- All insertions shall be typewritten .y - or printed neatly in ink. Date: -------9- — City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at __-_-_____- - — — — — -- -- —— — — — — — — in Ward ------6---------------- (insert street and street numbers here) / ' J Signature of Owner --- nIGF,(� )ltt//J ------------------ Street Address --------1--a--C(J�-- 1.1� /_-al --------- City/Town&State Cl_ f- ------------- -— - ---------------- , Telephone Number -- — `�/ - '3/ -- --- - • m Cit# ofttlezn, ttss�tcixsPts 9 andr Planning lll--- CHU Pall Adem, �lflassuc!luseHs D197D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT . OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE r; APPROVAL wN cy. In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the ey y applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a v. Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- tu �W mission for such determination. The notice shall be im Ma 'b attached to two copies of this Form A application. o. The notice and both copies of the application must v be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., _____________________�__ To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ________Q1iL ____T__/' - ----- - �'o —Gl/ 3 Sz e -1y� t T - - > x-------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not require/d. 1. Name of Owner ---------.0�_I /�----_!T__--__ W9,,TWC_e------------------- Address---------- ------ fZ ------ -------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ------11 A; J//-___� _-------------------- Address------1-d-0----�� FI XET X - �+-------------LGZ)- 3. Deed of property records in _ ' �C€M --------- SS—k7X__ QG.SLT,V Registry Book ----------------- Page ------12 -------------— 4. Location and Description of Property- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------1a_rs_xr_so�q-------?�&-------��;Fn� ------ --�-----,ESscx------r�ar� ry , ,6,CrjS_T?,Y_-7-- .[ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - bhr--------- ----- ----0//-----26---1V0je 61- CO-- r_�_ I-----1-o cA��-o-------4 �' r A c ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - -- - - ------- 40 5------ All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the P an together th the names of the Owners of the abutting lots. / `, Signature of Owner---,64,_,)�--- ------------ Address-------f ` 1 r- > as �L__----- t� Telephone Number ------------ - _,-33,141----------------------- V (fitly of .0ttlrm, Massar4usrtts Asp tsoars' (®frr (altg 'Mall October 11, 1967 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to certify that property in Salem, Massachusetts, for the years 1955 through 1965 was assessed as follows: Owner Location Valuation Harry A. Bliss 144 North St. House $6,500. Land 10100. R.144 North St. House 1,000. Total Valuation - - - - $8,600. Land area 6,882 Sq. Ft. BOARD OF ASSESSORS s ( Chairman BF 1 of Satera, �nssarhusrtts NbVembek 81j 1961 30hu 49. drug, 3r. 46ralb C. Attg=i4j 'Michael FAS"Shi Qliiq �ufi, Nbert X. fitcvff $86m; Au"Nehuuffii Louis A. Swiniuc-h, President City d6unciij City Hallq Salem, Massachusetts Dear" Mri Pt6g136hti Lasit W66k at the meeting held at the ftaw-thoi;n6 14diei keiaiifid io- the . propos6d apartment complex on upper Lorifig AV-6nue $ Ward 7, You stated the Council intended to set a date for 'a' Public Hearing oti tii6 PlahAing Boikd recommendations that were pregehidd to your dtotip idsi • June : At tiiat iimej I told you that the Board ffixi-ght' have further r66= ommendationi to extend the R=j (Multi-Family bigiriici 6ii Uppoe Loring Avenue.- Talking with John Serafini today, it h6nowappears his group will not have 'sufficient time to properly prepare thdilr -edse for this areae Therefoket I would recommend that the Council hold its hearing ori the recommendations you already hAVe ; Sometim6 iii the neat future; the Planning Board can hold another hearing on itis iiffid development on Upper Loring Avenue. I would also remind you that the Planhijid Board recoffiffiehd'&iion6 6A the other sections of the Ordinancesq iidv §661 ; 3' ; 4, 8; 6ic ; j should be acted upon at the same time as the Zoning r`966mmendatidris. All of these recommendations complement each other', 66 it they are not acted Upon at the same time ; there would still be 'a' conflict ; At the ptoper timej I can explain this in greater detaili I realize that a Public Hearing must be he-id only on Chapt6v 35; Zoning. The actual passage of that Ordinance and ail the others could take place at the same meeting. Very truly yours; ,YMGicc CI , PLANNING BOARD#C) aiftfiaft -_ -_ -__-__--.___-.- C� fr___-��S�C__._-�1/'- /,IJL-__LY�.GGLL4_C—/✓_tl-_o_ fir___10 0 <v u�2��G��`-o /t�(w_G—/✓ vGJ -d--�-i_}°_r, u__.SA-s- ---T!<e_�G c. a4 I.(.- J✓_E_4A_e_o r 4__-_f_L r —^-_e�-�_i G—_F o -_—<r-�o u t-G-_-N C LL_G_4 �Gn" �"tet 'JUS/Zo 2leor�,.n,�wr-� uv_r rlinr -r,/[�G__�ztGUr�Ga !'�_ _ �—•--7-0'�'?_C2o-u/'-- -�'t-r_�_ -"<"i C-•--�r--r_u_^_r _r r M_C� T o c. o_-�°-�---- - .__77th rr !l_'k_[ ��O!t rt l2—sa, t CN.- NQv G—�✓�T_N_v_-4!Z._C_C_l�ry+�(u o rr o_N c�ra- rCun A��> Cn4 f //« C?u v_!+ c✓ e._�_N_.o_f_—/L.e_u_G—f_u-F<rc�_C/G w_� t/«F`ry �rZd�4•Z G_y�� lG,��ARG.-- T!<Qi�_G� f�—��--uR—Tum<-- -A�LA'-/CRL f'o C_r—� -_ m_c._' L_2 _R_L_C o ir_m-�a.�_--_- r vn r--__TbC._—C, rJ u rr c e GTN_vL - _- �/0 _/.G_G—_/Z�_t_U Ih Y!7 /J./�_'�..FI ori t__—.�_G_t�__ %_G_R_`�'C_�DY- _.<✓A �J L_. ] '9 N-1 C_�J7'Yt araC_!L— N�fA_P<wG._.--Q��--T_/iC LA4o ---O-C.iGGo.L'_< Gb— SG_e-rr� _r_NC_ o_R.r2!iiir .eSGr -------------f_�_4!'[A—_.[1.l�nb_—_/7i' TCS.t�r/.i„4 -- -.TL.I'H�_ ._itr .._T-NC---�G_�✓_i�i_6� ---_—_--__/Z_i-4-ain_r+�_��2/q.�� �e._f.—�4_t—_Tu_G..fG,IZ_S_C_rztr��_C-4t�n�-� o •� r---- -/4Ct0 —_. �4-4Y-- oc -- �!/��encxS 20uiwG_ ,__`/iC_ Ac uwc- ------ - t_rAc-4.—. mak -Tkn! _ O.0/)uiAr� CG n-ern_ n4G _ r4G or/i_4,Q•_ T_G'G C_ P < <' L V + . ., �It#� �f ,,�ttlem, �Ctts�tttl�usP##s �ofia X91. Grep, November 8, 1967 akraia ffi. ,A�fhn 'afew 160hafaski call pail cALb"t X. Firtoff 'Odiem, Anssechu"f e pgmoaa A. J%teneg Mass. Federation of Plafuiing Boards, c/o Mr: Joseph Magaldi; Pz O. Boz 31, Brainireet Mass. , 02184 Dear Mr. Magaldit In the Spring of this year, we ordered and received four copies of "Planning Law and Administration in Massachusetts" : Zn September we wrote to Mr. McHugh, 195 Oliver Street; Pali River with regard to an invoice billing us for these books] but the letter was returned, would it be possible for you to find out and let this Board know if we have an outstanding account in the hmobni of s4oaoo for payment of these books. We would appreciate hearing from you soon. Very truly yours , Mptcc CITY PLANNING BOARD` Clerk • i ' � �i��i II� �2I�PItt� �KS$IIt�1ISE�S September 21, 1967 301F A Sada ffi. + L4"tlm ON MAI ,6108d fusho5+ski e6slem. cAU'u,�L phaff Mass . Federation of Planning Boards, 1;;:=g;:_NgA=gjzr=Ex= , c/o Mr. Joseph Magaldi, r75r75_Oti-re'i'-gtreet + P. 0. Box 31 , g$}}. r-b[asa. Braintree , Mass . , 02184 Dear Mr. McHuGht Magaldi: In March or April of this year, we ordered four copies of "Planning Law and Administration ion in Massa- chusetts" , and received them shortly afterward. However, we do not seem to have any record of paying for them, or rather receiving an invoice for them, as we have the money encumbered, and believe a purchase order was sent out to you. Could you check and let us know if we have an outstanding account for $40.00 . We would appreciate hearing from you soon. Very truly yours, MP: ccrk Cle • (fit of ,$ttiem, ttsttclju�ett$ ' �lxnttitca �uxr� November lit , 1967 John A. f16raq, 3c- 45eralD T. ,AArClart4p, (jitg pall pci ael paskofuski falem, 'Anasachusrtts Alhert X. pitcnff 2ngmanD . '$faeeneg Mr. Frederick A. Fallon, Director of Bureau of Planning Assistance , Government Center, 100 Cambridge Street , Boston, Mass . 02202 Dear Mr. Fallon: Thank you for your letter of October 30 , stating you will be able to attend the .November 16 meeting of the City of Salem Planning Board. We shall be looking forward to meeting you at that time . Very truly yours , MP: cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk " = I_ �efiair�fii�2P�>,fi�� (�o�r�rrr���cPiAiye��eue�fi�rrr,Pi�>fii a T. W. SCHULENSERG s ��J/////{J tG/� ��j�„� COMMISSIONER /OO Waj�JJj�V( A (i(1W e2M2 727-3221 October 30, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. City of Salem Salem Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: As stated over the phone to your secretary, I will be unable to attend your meeting on November 21 1967, due to another commit- ment. I shall plan to attend your meeting on the 16th of November which I believe is the third Thursday. If I don' t hear from you, I will assume the 16th meets your approval. S/ince Frederick A. Fallon Director of Bureau of Planning Assistance FAF/cw • f yeY H� of Salem' fflassar4usetts ���.a:4o�. �Ittzmin$ �nttrD October 24, 1967 �alln �. �irap, 7,Jr. (�eralil Y�. 'ac(Qarlllg �icllttel �laskvfnski �itp $all ,Albert P. ihnff Salem,&IRassnellusrffs PullmmuD JJ,Afaeenev Frederick A. Fallon, Director of. Planning Assistance, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Mass . Dear Mr. Fallon: Thank you for your letter of October 11, 1967- In this communi- cation you indicated you or a member of your staff could meet with the Planning Board on October 26, 1967. I must inform you that I have been requested to meet with the � . City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting on the 26th, so there will be no Board meeting that night. Our meetings are usually held on the first and third Thursdays of the month. If it is possible for you to attend our November 2 meeting, we shall be very pleased. The meetings are held at 34 Church Street and commence at 7:30 P.M. If this is inconvenient for you, please let us know which Thursday would be agreeable. i Very truly yours, JMG:c o CT. PLANNING BOARD, VCH.�IRMAN • xor.o Copy. xrjno ><r_rto� i T. W. SCHULENBERG COMMISSIONER �OQ�� 6reef, �oet,®�v 02202 727-3221 October 11, 1967 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. , Chairman Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts. Dear Mr. Gray: Myself or a member of my staff will be pleased to meet your Planning Board on October 26, 1967. Please notify me in regards to time and place. II Sincerely, i Frederick A. Fallon Director Bureau of Planning Assistance FAF/t • November 151 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerks City Hall, S, 1em,. Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on November 2/ 19671 it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the followingjdescribed plan: 1: Applicant - Boston and Maine Corporation, 150 Causeway Street, Boston: Masa. , 2. Location and Description -<-4000' square feet of land oTh Jefferson Avenues rear of Jackson Street to be conveyed to the adjoining property of E. & F. King & Coop Inc. : on Jackson Street 31 Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 1201 Page 30 Very truly yoursp i s Mh:cc CITY PLANNING BOARDS Clerk f BOORUM & PEASE " ori R" ® BOORUgf3 & PEASE " o'T� R" successors and assigns forever, a certain piece or parcel of land situated in Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts, and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point at land of Boston and Maine Corporation and land of Jefferson Realty Trust which is North 76° 03' West 333, 37 feet from the westerly sideline of Jefferson Avenue, so-called, Thence running along said land of Jefferson Realty Trust North 76° 031 West 200 feet to a point at land of Jerome R. & Mary A. Sousa. Thence turning and running along said land North 13° 57' East 20, 00 feet to a point at land of ' E. & F. King & Co. , Inc, Thence turning and running along said land South 76° 03' East 200. 00 feet to a point. Thence turning and running South 13° 571 West 20 feet to the point of beginning, be all of said meas- urements more or less, said parcel containing about 4,000 square feet q Ctv of �z1em, Itt$sc �ze## �'L'i •J�O� /c7/ G2 �7y1: %vz, 7 34 014=4 trees FORM A Salem, ussurltusetis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. ' g�g�� ��orton�__Mass,.—_October 3Qg_6.7___ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant .........Boston and Maine Corporation Address ______________150 Causeway_St-.,,_Boston,_ Mass. 02114 ---------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor--------J,__D,----Batchelder,_Engr,__of Design Address ---------------------------------------------sam a------------------------------- ------- 3. Deed of property records in ----------------Essex-_South_-----------------------Registry Book ---- —1201------------ Page -----30 4. Location and Description of Property- -------------------'---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q zoston, d Maine;;,, Corporation Signature of Owner _ U �_____________ t Atiorri Vy O • Address -----------------__ xca_y__Stretat ass. 82114 S 8 (aoG �e�overe�f ..4pproYat uaaer fire S�bdiYosco,-c. � C'Oty�s'oL ,Z 11w-tyo� f'egurYPd Satetrc .PLatcrtsrc9 Bo¢r>d � C cu dX.n s8 �a (Joon dl �eaYcrr95 Yeftf�' Q. N�y a X13 Ste` ,1�2 meed ,pta,e fC3-f92-/o �01 q° vsgtn°��a� Recera ` w 3O 250 (i /✓- 7Y 7- 41 aQj 01 (� f c � 1 4 �0� ;alh. inSB S/3'Sj ti q Ol OF 4-4 s . ,' TNOM,t3 DRUGUo #4J32 SUR U SUR �P dr ,� to v VALE vL' W cS. P o - S Boseors�`tKair�eCopoo��r�iorc �o Et69lofDesayri Ile /V z fl Scofc >';50 5C,011-967- s ept>9G7S ?6/37 92,.X /"56 " November 14, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on November 2, 1967, ' it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described plan - 1. Applicant - Nelson S. Kessler and Harriet Kessler 38 Crosman Avenue, Swampscott, Mass. 2. Location and Description - 95 - 97 Federal Street, Salem y as Lot #1 and lot #2 on said plan- { 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 5408 Page 131 r Very truly yours, MP:cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk of 'Sttlem, 'Mttssachumts � dct 11 ,5 oFF�ca ��� �uttr� Qv Attu �ttlem, �4tllassttcl2useffs D137D NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: ----Ac-g•___2_7.....l%b7 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at ___fig ` ---------i---------------- -- ----------------- --- in Ward -- ----------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) _ Signature of Owner .-- ___-- ------- Street Address-,--- ------------------------------ City/Towk\ State__Sw"3mQ8CGtt�– — -------------------------------------- I Telephone Number ------------------------ --------– – – – • ,r• R� r Salem, ' IU 50 9�T 27 & FILE t X11 �l EPA, k1_A`� gag 9011 FORM A Awm.A1ivmhus`a•aim APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., ----_--�34� 2719-- 67 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not . constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) all 1poLsL. shown on plan hege frontage o— n ways -- This plan is�epared to be filed with roDoB d �o aZi Tn� Peabody; r. , er-ux who m the ad oe - € 7 parcel with. Peabod s �P2 �„4}1-isc�Tr-Ia�Cl� �f - _y —parcel. and will not bQ_ senara_tg ___ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of OwneraELaota g-- cESS� — Address i Zr ossa n A - � --- -- Sraampsco#-t__--__ _- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ___-- Edw_ in_T__Brud2Ynski_—_ Address__—____—__—__Lafayette St. , Salem --------------- 3. Deed of property records in --------- y -- Registry Book —5406 — -- Page __13.�--- 4. Location and Description of Property: ----2:2-97—EeAeraI St Ra?PM ahnym _ •--------�---1g�--��_and lst__��_4FI__.H�3S�__�lr]II.------------------- --------------------------- — — --- -------= — --- ---- ---- � -- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the�i e of the abutting lots. Signature of Own e s Address-_-38 C soman. -v _wa Cott Telephone Number _-----------------__---- --- November 140; 1967 Mr. James H. Ballou, 125 Derby Street, Salem, Massachusetts Dear' Mr.' Balloui Thank you for your application for consideration as a consultant to -the City of Salem Planning Board. However, we must inform you that we already are committed to the Planning Services Group. Very truly yours MP:cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk • J • November 16, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on November 16, 1967 it was VOTED: To approve the Definitive Plan described as follows: • 1. Applicant: Salem Acres , Inc. 2. Location and Description: Rear of Gallows Hill Road, Subdivision Witchcraft Heights III 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry of Deeds, Book 5286, Page 735. Very truly yours , ����-d-�-vim..... K, SALEM PLANNING BOARD Ctv of ttlem, �Nassarhuse##s ;T Department of Public ?Morhs NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER November 9,1967. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re: Subdivision Plan of Witchcraft Heights 111, dated June 19,1967, Revised Nov. 6,1967. Gentlemen: The above referenced plan is a revision of the plan reviewed at your meeting on Nov. 2nd. At that meeting the developer was requested to revise his plans so as to show:- all land .owned by him with sufficient detail to indicate that no more storm-water or sewage will be discharged into the dewers of the original or this portion of the subdivision; the water supply from Rockdale Ave. with no connection to the water lines in the original subdivision; • details indicating that the sewer is low enough to drain from. below the basement floor of the houses; that the proposed discharge of storm-water from this area is to a natural watercourse; that the proposed additional sewage from this area will not overload the outlet sewer through Gallows Hill Park. It appears that the above requests have been complied with by the revised plans, and the supplemental computations. However, it still remains that an adequate water supply will not be available until the City' s pumping station on Highland Ave . is in proper operation. We expect this to be in a few more weeks. The plan detail showing that the sewer with only 4' of cover is low enough also 11mits the depth of any basement to be constructed in the area, either now or in the future . If you concur with the above limitations and decide to waive the other non-conforming items, such as width and dead-ending of streets, I: see no reason for any further revision. of this subdivision plan. Very truly yours, • Neal B. Mitchell f City Engineer 00 to Health Dept. @Ii#g of '�Sttlem, 'Massuchn u##s �e puarb of XraI14 o ;31_ �ttpitta, �C_ �., (Q(fttixmttn rJ xutt3 g ree William X. filahoneg, Jr. �Jvhn �. Q[vnmeg (, c�SeM Toorph P. Pr4axb November 16, 1967 Planning Board City of Salem 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Gentlemen: This department has reviewed the plans of DiBiase, labeled • Witchcraft Heights, III, Carter & Towers Engineering Corporation. We find that all the agreed changes have been made in the plans and we approve of the same as drawn. Very truly yours, FOR THE BOARD OF HEALTH JOHN J. TOOMEY, D.S.0;, Health Agent JJT:jaf CC: Attorney George P. Vallis 0 / 1 GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 REB., 35 PLEASANT STREET TELEPHONE 744-2172 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1195 November 17, 1961 Mr. Neal S. Mitchell City Engineer a City Hall Salem, Massachusetts REs Subdivision - "Witchcraft Heights III" Dated "M lk, 1967 as Poviged o r 6 196 Dear Mr. Mitchells Please be informed that the above-captioned subdivision was approved by the Planning Sward on November 16, .1967. My client, Mr. DiBiase, President of Salem Acres, Inc., informs me that he • hopes to begin work on this subdivision within a short period of time* The installation of the sewer and surface water drain pipes will be done by the firm of Pelletier & Millbury. I bring your attention to the newly adopted Subdivision Regulations* Section V. Paragraph D (2) wherein it states: ., . . .all utilities and backfilling of all trenches shall be inspected by the City Engineer at the expense of the contractor before any installation is made. The inspector of utilities shall be appointed and approved by the City Engineer, and shall be �responsible only to him. . . . .. In view of the fact that the underground work is expected to be started within two weeks time, would you kindly notify this office as to whom you shall appoint as inspector of utilities, i I also bring your attention to Section IIT, Paragraph B, (5A) wherein it states thats "The Subdivider shall file a performance boad. . . , .in • an amount determined by the Planning Board to be i S Mr. Neal B. Mitchell -2- November 17, 1967 sufficient to cover the cost of all or any part of the improvements. . . ." would you kindly furnish this office with your estimate of the amount of such a bond as determined by the unit prices as set forth in the Subdivision Regulations, taking into consideration the fact that the Planning Board has waived the requirements of fifty foot width streets and has allowed the construction of forty foot streets and has also waived the requirements of granite curbings and has allowed the installation of bituminous berm curbings. It is earnestly hoped that work on the new Subdivision can proceed with the minimum amount of delay, and I can assure you that my client is willing and eager to co-operate with your department in any way so that this work can be done properly and expeditiously to your complete satisfaction. Very truly yours, • GEORGE P. VALLIS OPV/ijp cc Salem Acres, Inc. 71 Hancock Street Everett, Massachusetts Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts „co>v1 I 1111 4l ll.. Cahn �C{.drag, ,`lfr. November 20, 1967 fl�eralL 2. 1�s(Qurtl?g 'filiciluel�iaehafuaki Cifg Pull j Albert P.19itcoff Sul=, ,.tz{ussacfemsefiu 2ugmanJ �fTj. '$fuernell . i Mr. Theodore Simons, 9 Harbor View Terrace, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Simons: The City of Salem Planning Board is undertaking a program to have a new Comprehensive Plan made for the entire City. This plan will su- persede the Comprehensive Plan that was made approximately five years ago. i At the present time, the Board is studying the scope of the work that will be a part of the consultant ' s contract, and we are having a special conference in the Planning Board office at: 34 Church Street, on Thursday, November 30, 1967, at 7:30 P.M. • As President of the Citizens Advisory Committee we cordially in- I vite you to attend this meeting so that you will be acquainted with the �I intent of the Planning Board. At the same time , the Board would like to discuss certain matters with you, principally the cooperation of the Committee with the Board. Unfortunately in the past, there was little or no liaison between the Advisory Committee and the Planning Board. - We hope that under this plan there will be a cooperative spirit with all of the citizens groups. j We look forward to having you attend our meetings. j i f Sincerely yours, i 1 JMG: cc ” { CITY PLANNING BOARD, VChairman f ' INCRO NF.RO NEROI y�,.tai ' Y.n.ny __J � . I t situ of Jsalem' 'Mttssarhusetts , I 3af n 01.Grag,3r. November 24, 1967 II ' �eralb 4Q. ,J�llTcalartllg ' liat �lichnel �aska(nski g Pull Albertihaff Salem,�{assachuseks pngmanb g. 'Sfaeeneg - f Honorable Francis X. Collins , City Hall, , f • i Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mayor Collins: This is to inform you that the Capital Improvements program for 1967 - 1972, as prepared by you and the Planning Board with the tech- nical assistance of our Planning Consultants, has been reviewed by the Planning Board. iThe Board finds that the Capital Improvements Program is a compre- hensive statement of the needs of the City of Salem for Capital Improve- i ments for the period 1967 through 1972 . Accordingly, the Planning Board has approved it and adopted it as its guide line for consideration of Capital Improvements in this City during that period. • As you know, the Capital Improvements program was presented to the City Council. You and the Board had the opportunity to review it with I the Council. They, just as the Planning Board, have been impressed with this first Capital Improvements Program which has been prepared for the City. It fills an important gap in our Planning function. We intend to prepare an annual revision of the Capital Improvements Program. In fact, the program for 1968 - 1973 is already being assembled. Very truly yours, JMG:cc �i✓ia e ��/( - , moi CITY PLANNING BOARD,jCHAIRMAN i X-C Z01 FIX ERD HERO %EPO gV'CMY ROPY 1 OI'•Y COPY (�Sity of jStt[em, 'Mttssar4usetts • Y g Department of 41uhfir Forks ��cNartE NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER November 24,1967. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re: Witchcraft Heights 111. Gentlemen: In response to an indirect request, I submit our estimate of X81, 500. as the amount required as security under the suhdivision Rules and Regulations, provided no allowance is permissible for tock excavation and its replacement with suitable backfill. The Rules and Regulations require that estimated costs be based on surveyed quantities. There has been no quantity survey made of rock excavation that will be encountered. This item has been known to increase the total cost by 200% to 300% on similar work. The Rules and Regulations provide a price to be used for rock excavation,but the lack of a surveyed quantity seems to prohibit its use. The amount determined by the Planning Board to be sufficient to cover the cost of all the improvements is the amount that should be set for security. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer i f s CtU of �$ttlent, �I assac4nortis • �;� V ! Pepartntmt of Public Forks "Ecc�,E NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER November 24,1967. George P. vallis, Esq. 70 Washington Street Salem, Mass. Re: Witchcraft Heights 112. Dear Mr. 'Dallis: Lt the November 16th meeting of the Planning Board you were requested to submit a work schedule. Such a schedule consists of a list of dates on which each phase of the work will be done,- that is, the starting and completion date for each phase of tfm,work. This Mould permit the City to provide intermittent inspection at the most opportune times. Your attention is called to the newly adopted Subdivision Regulations, Section V, Paragraph ID (2) wherein it states: "All sever, surface water drains, water pipes and any other underground facilities, together with tb lr appurtenances, shall be installed only after the sub-grade (the bottom of the sub-base of the roadway) has been established (con- structed on the grounA)'. This has not been done in the past by your client, and it bas bean the cause of most of the deviation from the approved grades. This must be the first item in your schedule of opera- tions, and I am quite sure that this item (the construction to sub-grade Of all rOs,ds, to their full width) will not be completed in any two week period. It is requested that your engineers submit W signed statement, 'that all roads have been constructed to sub-grade in accordance with the Subudivislon Control paws, before any attempt is made to install any of the underground facilities. An Inspection and approval by the City, will be required at this time, W hen the roads are properly sub-graded, and approved by the City, the underground facilities shall be installed in accordance with the approved plans. All work on these faciliti6-s shall be inepected by the City prior to any backfilling; of the trenches, or the facility shall be completely uncovered for such inspection.. This inspection shall not be considered as a final inspection because much more taork will remain to be done over these facilities and so a final inspection of them will be made at the completion of the entire project. Vhen the underground facilities are all Installed it will be necessary to regrade the roadways, and install the gravil sub-base. This sub-base shall be inspected by the City before any pavement work it started. If a work schedule (as outlined above) is prepared with the starting • dates of the various phases of work, and is then reasonably adhered to, there should be no problem with this department. As you well know, this department has no Subdivision Control Inspecto4, All the laws, ordinances and regulations (without funds) will not produce such an inspector. Intermittent inspection will be provided TRU of �$ulr t, Aussarhuselle • PE1JATttt[Eltt of?PAthlit asks ��camvE NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENOIN[8N by this department if mutual arrangements are made prior to the time such inspection should take place. Should such arrangements not be made and executed, the intermittent inspection will not be made and the final Inspection will be of doubtful value without much additional and expen- sive investigation. Please be advised that an estimate, with qualifying statements for determinaton .by the Planning Board, on the amount of security required has been submitted to the Planning Board. They should notify you of their decision on this matter. After the required work schedule is submitted,, and approved by the City, there should be no reason why the new subdivision should no*' proceed with the minimum amount of delay and with the best co-operation that this department can render under the prevailing conditions. Your client only needs to perform his work in accordance with the Subdivision Control Last, that ie,- its proper interpretation and application. Very truly yours, Neal . Mitchell City Engineer cc Planning Board. • 1 ` I f I cOr (/ U1 auAtCCG ?' 01 7P�� . �j� �p ! 44Jr��iJGreefi, �olfen. 021G�i' I� ' - - TELEPHONE 523-2454 4 November 27, 1967 i i Colonel Edward J. Ribbs, Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Public works 100 Nashua Street Boston, Massachusetts 02114 j i Attention: Mr. Daniel S. Horgan, Chief Engineer Dear Commissioner Ribbs: Re. Beverly-Salem and Vinnin Square Connectors , The Metropolitan Area Planning Council has reviewed the project listed above as proposed by the Massachusetts Department of Public works (Department) in accordance with Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966. ! ' The proposed Beverly-Salem Connector originates at Interstate 95 in Peabody, crosses Salem in a northeasterly direction, and ter- minates in Beverly, north of the Danvers River. The proposed Vinnin Square Connector extends from the Beverly-Salem Connector in Salem and ends in Vinnin Square, Salem, near the Marblehead- Swampscott boundaryi' The Council finds that the proposed project is generally consistent with the long-range comprehensive development program for the metropolitan area. Preliminary Department traffic assign- ment forecasts prepared in connection with the development program appear to justify the project. The connectors will serve Salem, +i Beverly, Swampscott, and Marblehead by providing a Salem bypass route, improved access to Vinnin Square, and a new Beverly Harbor Y Bridge. i } we are aware of the serious objections raised by the City of Peabody in regard to the Beverly-Salem Connector. The City of Peabody questions whether the route of the pro- posed connector through the southern part of the city of Peabody ; represents the only practical route alternative for the Salem- i. ; Beverly Connector to be linked to proposed Interstate Route 95 I extj,o� fxIC O Xr11U1. YIIo � is u.r� ( n•r ,c � 1 . 1' 7 ilii t ;Axl { Colonel Edward J. Ribbs -2- November 27, 1967 1 $ The Council is aware that it is the policy of the City of Lynn that additional highway connectors be extended eastward from Interstate Route 95 in Lynn in order to provide better access to the built-up sections of the City. The additional connectors proposed" by Lynn should be planned and considered in conjunction j' with the proposed location of the Salem-Beverly Connector in the City of Peabody. These additional planning and engineering considerations may result in alternative Interstate 95 interchange and connector locations that further the interests of both com- munities. Peabody's major objections to the route proposed by the Department are (1) a potential traffic hazard due to the proposed interchange on Lynn Street in the vicinity of the Brown Elementary School, (2) the impact of the connector on Spring Pond, a source i . for the city's water supply system, and its effect on Brown's Pond, a possible future resource, and (3) the separation of the South Peabody neighborhood from the rest of the city and residential acquisitions in this area. If the proposed Beverly-Salem Connector through Peabody is i? retained by the Department we strongly recommend that the Depart 'S ment eliminate the Lynn Street interchange, and thereby avoid a potential traffic hazard near the school and possibly reduce residential acquisitions. The Council further urges that Fairview Street not be terminated on each side of the proposed expressway as recommended by the Department, but be continued as a through way under the expressway route in order to minimize neighborhood I �. isolation and preserve access for emergency public safety equip- ment. We also urge the Department to insure that Peabody's water supply system will not be impaired by the connector. We 'agree .that the Department should apply to the Bureau of � i Public Roads for funds to prepare plans, specifications, and estimates. 'ections We urgeto the obi 'ithe Department to give due consideration of the City of Peabody during the course of future planning and engineering. Since the proposed project will not be constructed j until the 1970's according to the Department documents, there will be ample opportunity for the Department to work closely with Peabody and Lynn officials to bring about connector locations and designs { which will serve the best interests of both cities. I I , ii , I I j JUJ VVU 111 1Yi ... IOV_IM Ob3J 10!11%r I 1 Colonel Edward J. Ribbs -3- November 27, 1967 The Council would appreciate further contact with the Department, since a final application for the Beverly-Salem and Vinnin Square Connectors has not been submitted to the Bureau of Public Roads. We also anticipate further information on the proposed locations of other connectors from Interstate 95 be- tween Revere and Route 128. Ve trul yours, R bert G. Davidson .I Executive Director RGD:jtg CC: Mr. Carlton T. Garrett, Bureau of Public Roads Mayor Edward T. Meaney, Peabody Mr. Francis E. Dolan, MAPC Representative, Peabody Mayor Carl V. Joslin, Beverly Mr. Luther K. Herrick, MAPC Representative, Beverly Mayor Irving E. Kane, Lynn Mr. Peter F. Donnelly, MAPC Representative, Lynn Mayor Francis X. Collins, Salem Mr. John W. Barrett, MAPC Representative, Salem Chairman James N. Skinner, Board of Selectmen, Marblehead I Mr. John B. Pepper, MAPC Representative, Marblehead Chairman Edward P. Hannon, Board of Selectmen, Swampscott Mr. George B. Thomson, MAPC Representative, Swampscott td I i I 1 .• 4\Y•l,�\11TA n r TRU of �5,afem fflasmr4metts 131 e 15 �� �IMltkftlt� �II2iYt� Geralb Z. Aidgarthp - Aickmel Vn.knfn4i �it�t $all Albert�R.17itcoff CITY OF SALEM — — PLANNING BOARD 5alcm, ,.{?iassnchnscits {n mnnD 'foeenq NOTICE OF MEETING The City Planning Board will hold its December 21 , 1967 meeting at the Haw— thorne Hotel, at 6: 30 P.M. Dec .'7, 11,1967 JOHN M. GRAY, JR, , Chairman ' 752525i!525�57sa52�i5252.i'Z :Legal ,Notices �, nr�sacaasasacaasac�c+ � - .— CITY OF.SALEM planning.Board NOTICE OF ➢IEETING The City Planning Board will bold its December 21, 1967 Y meeting at the Hawthorne Ho- tel, at 6:30 P.M. JOHN M. GRAY, JR., Chairman i Dec. 7, 11, 1967. • a f,. Ti#V of �$tt1Pm, ffinsar4midis n TA ¢% -S,•Jt: f µ��[1[���� yyNy{N{yyyyy{{//�� AJ1�� yM/ ''���� AMINA\A\L44ye �ItUY3T Huhn ti3 dFxng Jx December 6, 1967 C7�exnlJ (�_ ?17e(Ilnx}Ee� �b?iicE!uel �]usknfuski (Gitq �inll �Ihext�2.�ilitcuff �ulem, �{nssacl?uscits ��u�mnnJ �_ �fneeue� Mr. Harold Hadley, Editor of The Evening News, Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Hadley: Enclosed herewith is a short article which I would re- quest the News publish in an appropriate place. Please head it in any way you feel acceptable . Thanking you, I remain Very truly yours, CITY PLANNING BOARD, Chairman • r i:. Tito of , $alem C�a c usetts N �✓ December 6, 1967 Orralb t_ ,fiicCRnrtllq r'i'�icfeael �7nskofnski QIitg Pill[ Albert �. �7itenff �nl¢m, r{3.iassnrllicsefts i "�t'2npmunil �. ��Lu¢exep To the Editor, Salem Evening News: Dear Sir: Seldom in the annals of a civic group does the departure of a mem- ber leave a sadness that is unanimously felt by the remainder of the group. At this time however, the Salem Planning Board is experiencing this feeling. On Sunday, November 19, 1967, our late member Michael Paskowski of Bow Street passed away very suddenly. On receiving word, I immediately contacted the remaining members of the Board; needless to say, we were all stunned. Mike had been at our meeting on the preceding Thursday and was in the best of spirits. In fact , only Saturday evening before, Mike called me on some matters pertaining to the next meeting of the Board. By nature Mike was not loquacious , but would listen to others very attentively, his face alight with bright sparkling eyes and on his lips just a trace of a smile . While the rest of the members were debating, Mike would be silently analyzing all the facts . After a while, one of us would usually say, "Well Mike , what do you think?" In a very few well chosen words , Mike would summarize the entire problem with a solution we invariably would all agree with. Mike served on the Planning Board for almost four years . Except for vacation periods , he never missed a meeting of the Board. He attended • many meetings held all over Essex County, representing the City on Plan- ning Board matters . No matter how busy he was, none of the members ever saw Mike get angry, he never cursed or for that:• matter, used slang. D _ 2 _ i Mike was a well educated man. He was born in Austria, but grew up in Salem. He was a graduate of the Massachusetts Institure of Tech- nology. He was also a good business man, being proprietor of the House I of Eagles on Essex Street , and the Danvers Foundry and Machine Company I t in Danvers . Rather than memorializing Mike by a transcript in our official rec- ords , the Planning Board wish to memorialize Mike publicly. Mike ' s death leaves a large gap in the official family of the City. Mike was a God- fearing man, a good family man, a good neighbor and a good "Boss" to his employees . He was a conscientious civic servant and a valued member of our Board. Although Mike is now gone his memory will live . To know Mike personally was to know someone whose friendship we all cherish. Mike was a good man, a gentleman in the true sense of the word. Very truly yours, SALEM PLANNING BOARD Chairman " J I December 89 1967 t 34 Raymond Road r Salem' Mass., 01970 Mr. Albert R. .Pitcoff Attorney , 70 Washington St, . Salemp Massachusetts Dear Alt Last evening/ after the meetingt„Chris Callahan handed,me the enclosed letter which ;was received from Pearl 8 McNiff. ' s I would appreciate it if ,you could read same over and familiarize,yourself with it�so that we;may take some sort of action at our next meeting. "After,you+have finished with,the enclosed.. please return them. to', Chris. n. '. Sincerely yours,, John M." Grays Jr. JMGJRttab - • • 1 1 •Dinndr Meeting Dec : 131at 6 : 30 , Starboard Room, Hawth- orne Hotel : John Gray Sr. ✓ Joseph Doyle ✓ William Abbott James Boulger ;/ Arthur Labrecque Mayor Collins ✓ / Al Dobrosielski✓ Dan O'Brien ✓ Ted Simons / John Gray, Jr.V/ Jerry McCarthy Al Pitcoff ✓ Ray Sweeney (Order from menu) i' RE C E APU Of C'5U1 , f ttssar4use#fs DEC 8 11 22 AM 187 �(JlMnnin� inttrl 1 Zahn ffl. Grag, Mr. CITY CUkFK--i OFFICE Geralb T. Ac(Uarthg SALEM MASS, Aichnel Vaskafnaki 34 Church *reet Albert F.'Vilcaff 'Massachusetts t agmsna�(. Siveeneg .. December 8, 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey ` City Clerk I : Salem, Massachusetts . i Dear Sir: I I At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on December 8, 1967, it was VOTED: To approve the Definitive Plan described as follows: I 1. Applicant: DiBiase Realty Trust I I 2. Location and Description: 7.2 acres of land off Highland Avenue, Proctor Street and Hillside Avenue, Subdivision Heritage Heights, Carter & Towers Engineering Corporation, dated September 20, 1967 as Revised. Very truly you s, RK, Pro Tem Salem Planning Board 1 • i' �I Ti#v of 'Salem; Anzarhuse#ts , j �'ciwn��°"� �12III1TtYL� �It2Ii� I Tdlln M. (Sent, Mr. December 8, 196'7 Gerald T. �fflcTurlllp Alicilael junshafnshi CHU dull Albert P. Vitcoff '5alem, 'Onssachusetts { �Rngmonil Afueenell a i You are cordially invited to attend a dinner 'i meeting of the City Planning Board with the i Board of Appeal at the Hawthorne Hotel on Wed- " .j nesday, December 13, 1967. The meeting will be held in the Starboard Room at 6: 3v P.M. i CITY PLANNING BOARD, vChairman i �i I , i i I j i i • John GraV, Jr. December 12 , a1.967 4Snala T. !fi c(lart4V .fflickatl Vashatuaki a¢i4 fail ,Alb,l fid. pf"ff o'F3atte.t, 21Ynca,cftcnse*.tn pumonb -A. p15fnttnq Planning Services Group, 18 Eliot Street , Cambridge , Massachusetts Gentlemen: The Preliminary Concept of the Program of Planning Studies which was sent to the Salem Planning Board early in November, 19679 has been reviewed by the Board. Most of the concepts have been previously dis- cussed and we would say that the Paragraphs under the Main Headings , 1, 2 and 3 could be followed as outlined in the Program. However, when it comes to Paragraph 4, "Special Planning Studies11 , we would require a broader outline and a little more research than what your Concept indicates . At the present time , our thinking is as follows : NORTH RIVERa Representative Samuel Zoll has talked with me about this par- ticular subject quite a few times over the years. He is going to file some sort of legislation, (at the present time , he does not know exactly what the Bill will contain) , to see if the long overdue North River Clean- up can be effected. Although you are not a resident of Salem, you have been in and around the City long enough to know what a problem the North River is . We would therefore , wish to have you broaden the scope of your services insofar as this plan is concerned so that any studies by "others" would be analyzed as part of our own plan. In any event , I would appre- ciate it if you could contact Representative Z®11., and discuss this mat- ter further. HISTORIC SITES: In general, the Historical considerations as outlined will be sufficient for our purposes . However, we would again emphasize because of the concepts used in previous historical studies , several local groups , particularly the Historic Salem, Inc . , tried to use the report as a !ever to have a "Williamsburg" type of renewal rather than the renewal which your concern has set up. The Board has always taken the position that we do wish to preserve and enhance structures that are really historical. and have some historical-architectural merit . By the same token, we do not consider a building, just because it is old, necessarily has histor- ical value . Please have your consultants confer with us at all times so that they will have complete understanding of this phase of the planning. i 2 1 WATERFRONT: We agree with your concept except that we feel. that all the Sreports made by others should be consolidated into one specific report so that everyone in the City will understand completely what is being done in the way of developing the Waterfront areas , and what the status of the development is at the present time . ROUTE 1-9� - MULTI FAMILY DOUSING-. The last items in your report , Rte. 1-95 and Multi-Family Housing, we feel are sufficient in concept . We will make no special reference to them as we assume during the development of the plan, these items will be discussed and finalized. We therefore , wish to have you start immediately preparing the Ap• plication Forms , using the latest form issued by the Department of Com- merce for this pur ose . If it is possible to file this application prior to the New Year, we wish to do so . Sincerely yours , JMGecc JOHN M. GRAY, JR. , CHAIRMAN Copy to: SALEM PLANNING BOARD Mayor Francis X. Collins All Planning Board Members Files r PLANNING BOARD — — CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS .., ._ .. _._._ .December S. 1967 .. Re: Program of Planning Studies City of Salem, Mass. Planning Services Group 18 Elliott Street Cambridge, Massachusetts Gentlemen: The Preliminary Concept of the Program of Planning Studies which was sent to the Salem Planning Board early in November — 1967, has been reviewed by the Board. Most of the concepts have been previously discussed and we would say that insofar as the Paragraphs under the Main Headings, 1, 2 and 3 could be followed as outlined in the Program. However, when it comes to Paragraph 4, "Special Planning Studies", we would require a broader outline and a little more research than what your Concept indicates. At the present time, our thinking is as follows: NORTH RIVER: Representative Samuel Zoll has talked with me about this particular subject quite a few times over the years. He is going to file some sort of a legislation (at the present time, he does not know exactly what the Bill will contain) to see if the long overdue North River Cleanup can be effectuated. Althoudh you are not a resident of Salem, you have been in and around the City long enough to know what a problem the North River is. We would, therefore, wish to have you broaden the scope of your services insofar as this plan is concerned so that any studies by "others" would be analyzed as part of our own plan. In any event, I would appreciate it if you could contact Repres— entative Zoll and discuss this matter further. HISTORIC SITES• In general, the H'storical considerations as outlined will be sufficient for our purposes. However, we would again emphasize because of the concepts used in prev— ious historical study, several local groups, particularly the Historic Salem Inc., tried to use the report as a lever to have a "Williamsburg" type of renewal rather than the renewal which your concern has set up. The Board has always taken the position that we do wish to preserve and enhance structures that are really historical and have some historical—architectural merit. By the same token, we do not consider a building just because it is old, necessarily has historical value. Please have your consultants con— fer with us at all times so that they will have complete understanding of this phase of the planning. WATERFRONT: We agree with your concept except that we feel that all the reports made by others should be consolidated into one specific report so that everyone in the City will understand completely ob at is being done in the way of developing the Waterfront areas and what the status of the development is at the present time. ROUTE 1-95 — MULTI—FAMILY HOUSING: The last items in your Report — Rte. 1-95 and Multi—Family Housing, we feel are sufficient in concept. We will make no special reference to them as we assume during the development of the plan, these items will be discussed and finalized. Planning Services Group —2— December 81 1967 We, therefore, .-wish to have you start immediately preparing the^ t 'Forms using the latest form issued by the Department of Commerce for this purpose. If it is pos— sible to file this application prior to the New Year, we wish to do so. Sincerely yours, John. M. Gray, Jr.. Chairman, Salem Planning Board JMGJR:tab December 129 1967 Mr, Augustine J. Toomey# City Clerk, City Hall# Salem., Mass. Dear Mr. Toomey: At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on December 7, 1967r it was i VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re,* quired"on the following described Plan - 1. Applicant - Roland A. L'Heureux, 14 Pickman Street, Salem* Mass. • 2. Location and description, 12*300 sq ft lands Corner of Dearborn and Walter Streets 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 3008 Page 233 Very truly yours, SRP:ec CITY PLANNING BOARD, Clerk ProTem • ,�� �Ittxlnixcg �nxr� '" �itg all Salem, �lassaclluseiis 0147D to W p o 0L_ �,,4 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO W H a u ccm 8 FORM "A"APPLICATIONS LU See Foran "A" applications for �o Yy complete instructions for filing. ~ All insertions shall be typewritten r. CAv or printed neatly in ink. Date: f' eP�S►�_bep�_r 917 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. _ fThe�leand shown on the accompanying plan is located at ___`_of�Q�1[Z_QT_�� QQn�n_ �d --- ----------------------- in Ward -------------------------------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here) Signature of Owner ______ Street Address ------- --- --- -- / f /��� r — ` --------------------------- City/Town&State — —`S i7r/1//�/?_1----f/-L-Ct��/SLS- Telephone Number ------------{--X------------�� 4 T --------------------------------------- • (�i# n4ttlem, ECtt�sttczse##s eitu Pau Salem, �lassac[tasetis II197D FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL 4 N ,$ In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a 40 Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice sball be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. 7 Salem, Mass., _�C em_�� ----4---19 4-1 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision ' hin the me ing of the Subdivision/�CContt Lr because (See Sect. II-A and • state specific reasons) _ 3Y---q___ n_ _U1_a- ____ Sl1D1JI1 v {7 ? -rxa�, C a' r�asI F of�_ �/s ERr+ } ,9� d�6y FaaAs / xLQ_- pR__�sih�_a _Z__e�_r_oa tU6U---a �oue and herewith submits said p an for a det ination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Con aw is not eq ' ed. I. Name of Owner - Q�r3117- -_&t-LeyRegy--------- ------------------------------------- Address----------f 1_GIt'/Y1 t1_vt-'---------� Z-/tem--/40—a-s---------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _-__-_y��&V4.pi_ ___ ____ 13R-�.t_f� --- �L�[1-L -_-------------- Address –�� -Q-----------�id - �f- !C2tf?--J�C-a 3. Deed of property records in ---------------------------------------------------r------ Registry Book _78-0-Q --------------------- Page ------�0--3-3 – - - - 4. Loca 'on and Descr'ption of Property: ____CC_L tl_e__l�_____of____ _ L � tI , a_7em r21__ _ ------------ 7_- �c--- , moo ---- -- ---- ------ -------- -- --- -1�e2-St�---- �a � -r - n - -! oR__a_7IL j ofaoofa�e Y" -------- 712- eta ��t - - �a��h - 'emar't�l_D_n_a__25kLIP t --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown o together with the names f the Owners of the abutting lots. Signature of Owner--.-------- - - - --- --=--� J Address------------------- ---------- - ---— - -_--- _ -- 1�_�I17�a Sr Telephone Number _____ 5~"__ /__ -- ----------------------------- F. (9ttu of ,Stt1rm, Massachusetts �lttzming �nttr� Halm 0, Oral!, Mr. December 12 , 1967 igralD Z. lidlc4Iart4p 46irlluel #aehorvski @lite Pall Albert g. Vitcoff 'Ialem, Aassacllusetts �RagmanD �Fj. �fueeueg Dear Councillor Elect You are probably familiar with the concept of the "Workable Pro- gram" that the City of Salem has been developing during the past six or seven years . It has become recognized by the general public , how- ever, only for the past two to three years . The whole program has so many facets that it would be almost impossible to set them forth in a letter. Most , not all , of the proposals are initiated by the Planning Board. They are then sent to the Mayor for adoption. Before adoption, the Mayor sends the proposals to the Council for their approval . I£ approved by the Council , they are then returned to the Mayor to be in- cluded in the Program, and sometimes , as in the case of the enclosures , made a part of the City Ordinances . One of the prerequesites of the recertification is an annual review by the Planning Board, of all the Ordinances , and an updating of them if the Board feels it is necessary. Included in this program were two new Ordinances , one - Chapter 4 , Salem Building Code , and Chapter 35, Salem Zoning Ordinance ; the zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1965 , and the Building Code in 1966 . Rather than having the Ordinances printed in a bound form, the Planning Board recommended not doing so until the Building Inspector had a chance for a fairly long period to cite his experiences with the Codes and confer with the Planning Board. As a result , the Board authored several amend- ments to both codes , practically all in the nature of clarification and then sent them with our recommendations to the Council . It is our understanding that the Council will hold its Public Hear- ing early in 1968 , after the new Council is sworn in. I have already had two conferences with the present Council to brief them to the intent and the reasons for our recommendations . I know that even after a care- ful study, it is very difficult to digest and understand either Ordin- ance in its present form, or the proposed amendments . For that reason, I invite you to my home at 54 Raymond Road, South Salem, so I could brief you. If you could call me at my home at any time after 6: 00 P .M. , (745- 0194) , I could then set a date that would be convenient for all of us . 2 Enclosed are copies of Chapter 4, the Building Code , and Chapter 35, the Zoning Ordinance , together with the proposed amendments and our rec- ommendations . I hope you will call me soon. Very truly yours , JMG: cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, CHAIRMAN __._-____//oi-y�_ _-/fl7aJ-2.<st__---__Lv_c-c_un_G._-!l. f�/>� o!' ro✓�-�G,G_✓YG._ `=✓2.L?✓ti!lyC�_ 1.L114 oo 12__ o�YlneC _ ILGGah,rhL✓� .� ,r .^.00 �- Tq Tot .�� L,lieee - C a u c cmc--"J`--- Z-6_(` C✓o�Ke 9 cc.._ C_/7o_G_2n_r�/ —_r_�A�__cs c �y_ �_�<Crh—._Er — F32fri_ _ DEvCco� e[r�—D_u.z!G_G_T_/✓_<-�A�_r__-G-Q,e.._� - - --_ Yci.:2<.- ._/T.-NAr- ---3Ceom<__ .-21C.Co_C_y•Z.E.a BY-- - L4< y._.G'_f..UC-✓Z"--�------ -- - WN0C- �-- SG.r /(/(!�S_r_ /�v �✓] t L_�-0.�-_--L-Ly--I�.Zo�a O f_�(.c..f_ _/_/.eC.-__----__ _ -- --/_N 1.rr�1/�/-��!J)�Y -i 4G__/ Cq-aJ%iir-GT�o/1!Z/1-.--��✓_G�_Q.e C__ T�G.4 fCu''-�'U -. ___.__f'!a�_-L_-�-`cy-_Uc�_-_F_o_Q-__/7_4_oJz_•_1-P..4_.__-__�/'_u 4_<--i/O_o� r • o_ea. TIfC /T/ o�_- _l aPq r4C wac.0 l2fturluco ' o !`T e4_r_4_- ----. OF vc _�4CC�Sc �[S ! M✓lrJc �! ✓i2r —o4 _rliG ✓ rY �2![r-.Nc<_s_.--- -- . oal(C aUC�/sr<C. Off. 7�rGiG. - !Z<-c ox/- —11Uvl� fc�2f k-viC.aJ _ _BY 1 __-'___ _-___'_�U7_��—,_CP.p_.�-L!_T_G.N_�i�.._ ._4X._ ._T_G C_fQh.�.-/_F_. __T<✓L./�-�-:1 C..IAS. -t'•4�.7't7. NC_GL._- —. .. 4ircR._ �<—�L(c.Ct•,-2o..N!�.G._�>21 i�i� cC..._.._�i✓CcS�G�' 2.P-, elv —r1, c4_r�/_CQ_v< rC_T_!tl_CL2/Z/4C�<cr �� -_-_- ,tc0,,71-< --.. _ __.tJ�.t�----�---._<•!s-r.i. CC---7`-G ---�-_tea 12c.y___Lols_G�?GIC. e o ---L<z-- e/- ------.._- — -----�/er ---�h�_C_!1-e�C�<cc- _u_iew_r.wc--�r�oe-r�ua cd_�f-C�_ c✓ .rt,—roe— y .. ----- - - _<4_u_r_I1o,�eo_T�uc-l��� A�', u�2r±,cam -r"--73or[r— L.�o-cs-1----._. .cam . -----j�liCN_- .�C4,_-.__�•`/CH�_—(U_ir_ u- v�.2_._.,�eCam<n_.F�.osrlodr �0/�'1�L —___ -_ `-O_u_e�_c R-c-•---- /��r sz./2// .oc�Z_fC../�.t�_.�_i•vG :!!<L�rIiC�-"moi I�C_ic_.sct ic..c— _T!✓_C_ /dC.,Cl CQl�_L_C/C�_._CS—S_[J_�da< <_t-_.__�/,Uk.u.G. _.it<.2_C/_4.y-/1ga I _CCZILE-G_cTc¢ccc ry rrl_n-IclvD-A /-I o li.t... KhioGl._- mac_—_Eu<.Q__il —_. _.-C_![?C�•vG_.__.Tr(�2Y--/_T_ IC' Cl_C •QS—lJt2`c—Q�F<C_iccr [ r _TO��-C fr' _ �ce.rZ[m4" / \ rco----�s�, cwOn_e/4�f.-__ -��Z/n/ T�✓�r�—�Cf/,�tSu_,v-! -� LlGm_G_.flr o --/t— ALv __4�v_�� - - --rfr--`-'�-�—E.CU.y, c --��_ _.,Q•v_s=r_.r,_'_c___�,c rc.R—_�,_j'•'�P _._r"�L.L��S-=a.�g=Q---� cu(- D -9G— - ---------- W�r!�—T4-C--�2o�>_u CC2--�ih 4r�a rn C4_S-r _—eCC✓_e _Qu.r�,/2LC ar+,no_ev-8.6.�_®-u_r— 4' J " ROBERT-E -CAHILL --- -- — — ---- 40 FELT STREET SALEM BRUCE J_MC -LAUGHLIN --_ c 37 BARR STREET SALEM JOSEPH R. INGEMI JR_--- -- -- - - ---- -- -- — — — — — -- — 48 JEFFERSON AVE -- ------ -- - ---� SALEM RICHARD J. GUY �— - 11 CYPRESS STREET — --- --- _ SALEM 9 [ CITY GOVERNMENT Standing Committees of Council _ i 1967 1967 �a il Term of Offic0. Two Yeare ACCOUNTS—Counci:Igrs O'Keefe, McCabe, Butler i From pie,Monday in January,1966 �' BONDS—Councillors Marquis,Burke,McCabe - - -' — - s. ✓^'�a'c -CLAI MS—Councillors Marquis, McCabe,O'Keefe -' - - MAYOR 1� CONSERVATION & NATURAL RESOURCES—Councillors Marquis, Perm., Malone 'x Term of Office. Two Yea- ELECTRICAL AFFAIRS — Ccuneil:ors Butler, McCabe, -- - FRANCIS X. COLLINS .�J C Dolan - - - <C -Oc'sT FINANCE — Councillors Pathos, Dolan, McCabe, Perren, - PRESIDENT OF CITY COUNCIL v VVV - Burke - FIRE DEPARTMENT — Councillors O'Keefe, Poitras. -- \ To.of Office, One Year, 1967 Q� MorencY _ c', LOUIS A.-SWINIUCH HARBOR DEVELOPMENT — Conciliar' Poitras, Marquis, Perron INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS—Councillors Perron, Marquis, COUNCILLORS AT LARGE M.numy Term of Offices Two Yean - LEGISLATION—Councillor Swiniuch LICENSES & PERMITS'— Councillors Dolan, Pelletier; From First Monday ta-January, 1966 Butler - / JOHN H. EURKE 1 MILITARY AFFAIRS — Councillors Burke, Pelletier. JAMES W. DOLAA Forms` - � - PHILIP L. MORENCY ORDINANCES — Councillors MorencY. Marge s, McCabe, Dew, Person RICHARD W. POITRAS POLICE,DEPARTMENT — Councillors McCabe. Buller, . U Perron PUBLIC HEALTH — Councillors Dolan, Pelletier. Butler �. WARD COUNCILLORS - PUBLIC PROPERTY — Councillors Pelletier, MOrenty, Term of Offim Two Yean Burke- 1966 PUBLIC WELFARE— Councillors Pelletier, Dolan. Butler From Fist Monday iv January, PUBLIC WORKS— Councillors Marquis. Dolan, Pelletier Ward One—LOUIS A.SWINIUCH REGIONAL PLANNING — Councillors O'Keefe, Marency. - yJ.�c - '"Ward Two—JOSEPH A.O-KEEFE BuL'er, Perron.McCabe _s Ward Three—WILFRED J. PELLETIER RENEWAL & REHABILITATION — Councillors Perron, Ward Pour—JOHN J. SUTLER Marquis, O'Keefe,Buller, Burke -� Ward Five—GEORGE W. MARQUIS RULES—Councillors McCabe, PeMrron, Burke o SALARIES—Councillors Marquis, arency, Dolan, Burke, Ward Si:—GEORGE F. McCAEE Poitras Ward Seven—EDMOND J.PERRON,JR. SHADE TREES — Councillors McCabe, Bul:er, Moreney - `\ City Council meets at a:DO P.M.on Second and TRAFFIC—Councillors Burke,Poihas, Pzllelier T 1 Fourth Thursdays of Every Month i December 12$ 1967 Mr, Augustine J., Toomeyo City Clerk$ City Hall, Salems Mase.: Dear,Mrw Toomey$ At a meeting of thew City Planning Boardo held on December 7� 1967'0 it was VOTED To endorse YApproval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described Plan - 1. Applicant - Gertrude A, Staebner# 25 Savoy Road„ Salem$ Mase. 2• Location and Description - Lots A and B on Savoy Road 3. Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book 4156 Page 533 Very truly yours$ ARP Eco CITY PLANNING BOARDgC1erk ProTem Dec 5 10 s5 AN 11 Fln ming Aaxrb CITY CLL 1i(VS UFFitt SALEM, MASS. QI#u gnu Salem, lBllaesac!luse#s D1D70 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM "A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: December 4, 1967 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is ° not required. The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at -_the corner—of Savoy Road and Hemingway Road — — — ——-------------- in Ward -- seven-------------------- -- ----------- (insert street and street numbers here) n (� Signature of Owner ----tWasin:gt�cn - _ A--_—_ _ - � _q� 81 Street StreetAddress ------------------------------------------------------------------ City/Town&State--------Salem--' Massachusetts-------------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number 744-1148 — ——— • <. . RE C u lextt, ttsszxt �z�e s DEC `J 10 59 AN 10 PIttttnizt$ Puxrd CITSAL�M� MASS. 0av psi[ Salem, ,�[assaci?aseiis II197II FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, fled with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., -----December-42-----------------19_67— To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not • constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) ___bath_1QtE__-shGyIL_Q __r-aid-_1�Len__ae_1ot_A__awQl 14t B_ha_v_e---------___ frontase_on_Savoy Road, which a_public way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of OwnerGertrude A. Staebner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Address __________25 Savoy Road, Salem, Massachusetts - - -- -- --- -- -- ------------------------------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _______Edwin T. Brudaynski-----------------------------_-__ _ _ --------------------- Address___ _________ ___260 Lafayette Street, Salem, Massachusetts 3. Deed of property records in ______Essex South District-------------------- Registry Book ---- 4156 ------ Page - 533- --------- 4. Location and Description of Pro The _propertyl__which I desire to conylp is shown_on_the_plan_herewith-as_a_vacant_lot_of_land as Lot_A_and_is_a_portion of the property described in the deed to Emerson Staebner and Gertrude A. ----- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ------------------ Staebner husband .ripe, as tenants b� the entiret�r, Emerson Staebner is now deceased. - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the Plan together with,tbe names of the Owners of the abutting lots. F/. zcc�� C¢ Signature of Owner----------- --- f Address -----_____________81_WashinCton Street,__Salem, Massachusetts Telephone Number ----? �17�i8 — ----------------------------- December 129 1967 M�4 Augustine J. Toomeyp ' City Clerkq City Halli Salem* Masa. Dbar Mr, Toomeya At a meeting of the City Planning .Boardy held on December 7* 1967• it was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- i 4 qt red" on the following described Plan - le Applicant - Robert Talboti Trustee of Broadway Realty Trust' 1 Laurent Road# Salem* Mass. 2f. Location and Description - Land on 2 Buchanan Road 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry Book Page Very truly yours, ARPecc - CITY PLANNINt3 BOARD Clerk Pro Tem ® P®ORUM & PEASE " o ma" ® EOORUM RECEIVED OEC 12 sa PM 'fiI CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 1 PLANNING BOARD CITYSALEMKMAOFFICE SS. City Hall Salem, Massachusetts December 7, 1967 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application --• submitted to me this day to the Planning Board of the City of Salem requesting .a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. . The land shown on the accompanying plan is located at #2 Buchanan Road in Ward 7. Robert Talbot, Trustee Broad y R T ust By 't At rn j, 141411 Address 70 Washington Street , Salem City & State Salem, Massachusetts Telephone Number 744-2172 47' RECF( of �$Z&M, flAUSSUC4USMS DEC 7 12 58 PH 191 Pming Pow CITY CL-Kr, a OFFICE SALEM MASS. Cttg Pau �, �al,�l�tr.sis7u FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE K APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The'notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass.;.....1]ecember—Z,-------_-19 -Z To the Planning Board _Li The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons) e_asA__1_o"bQwn__on---plan Ji4s-_�r4[Ztage__.Qn_gublic-__wAY-- .andetitioner has obtained---- v _ y_approalbthe Board of Appeals for --------- - --------- a_yarianQg_from the zonin9_ordinance______-_ --------------- -- -—--------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning 'Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I. Name of Owner ---$sbe _ albota__Trut_e�of Broadway Rea1t�TXust_ Address-_1_ LaurentRoad,.__Sale m,---Massachusetts 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _Edwin__T.__3rw zy_nski Address_2_6Q__L&LfaXe1tQ---S x s_eQ_t�_�a I Ili._Ma��a�hu s e t t s--_- 3. Deed of property records in ------------------------------------------------------------ Registry Book -- - - - — -------- Page -------- 4. ------4. Location and Description of Property: ------------------------------------_---- ------------------ --_ 2_�1a �hanan Aoad - - - --------------- -- -- -—— - - - --------------------- -- ----- - - - -- -- -- - - — - ---- ---- ----------------------- - -- — - - ---------------------- - _ n 5. AllYstreets and abutting lot lines shall be shown on the lan toge r 'th a names of the Owners of the abutting lots. Broadway Realty r st , b t Attorney, Signature of Owner GAO -- { - Address-Z4--WashzztatQnS_t Ee�-------------------------- Telephone Number ____T44-2172 December 12# 1967 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerks City Halls Salem, Mass.. Dear Mr. Toomey; At a meeting of the City Planning Board, held on December 79 1977, It was VOTED - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Re- quired" on the following described Plan _ 1* Applicant - Alfred C. and Barbara A, Bradley, 4 Cross Avenue, Salem, Mass.,, and Mildred Scott. Z. Location and Description r Lots A, B and C on Cross Avenue 34 Deed of Property recorded in Essex South District Registry, Book 5358 page '426 Very truly yours$ ARPacc CITY PLANNING BOARD; Clerk Pro Tem BOORUM & PEASE BOORUM & PEASE " O k .Ft" r a m RECEIVED (TTi# of �z jvut ttssttc �z�e##s 9���G°mEQEC 2 08 FK 41lttntlilt$ nttr� CITY CLEii�'S OFFICE (litapall SALEM- MASS. Massachusetts 01970 NOTICE TO BE ATTACHED TO FORM"A"APPLICATIONS See Form "A" applications for complete instructions for filing. All insertions shall be typewritten or printed neatly in ink. Date: December 7, 1967 City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Sir: I hand you herewith two copies of Form A, an application submitted by me this day to the Plan- ning Board of the City of Salem requesting a determination and an endorsement on a plan filed with said application that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations is not required. bounded by Cheval Ave., Cross Ave., The land shown on the accompanying plan is:ltta adrab__________-______--__-___-___________--------------------- ------and--High-Street -------------------------and_High_Street - — - ------------- in Ward ---------------------------------------------- (insert street and street numbers here)0 0 �n e "'t Q LA0%X7 Signature of Owner -Gz Street Address ___70__Washington Street City/Town&State------AMI eIns_Ma88. ----------_--_--- ------------------------------- Telephone Number __745-3030 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- �CEIVED (gaol II �TIExtT� ItSSS?SCC��iSES IV ��ttnnixl� �nttrD GITYSA4EM�MASS.ICE Citq fall �a[eny �iassashixsetts 01970 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL In accordance with provisions of Section II-B, the applicant must file, by delivery or registered mail, a Notice with the City Clerk stating the date of sub- mission for such determination. The notice shall be attached to two copies of this Form A application. The notice and both copies of the application must be "date stamped" by the City Clerk and then one copy of this Form A, with the Plan, filed with the Planning Board by the applicant. All notices and applications shall be typewritten or neatly printed in ink. Salem, Mass., --____--_December'--7---------19 67- To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not . constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (See Sect. II-A and state specific reasons)LOtsAt__-Bt_-&_ Cwere Il_ n_ formerly ownershipj__at which time both dwellings were constructed. On May 25, 1940 Lot A was conveyed. By error a portion of the dwe113ng was not iriciuded""3n--this-coriveyance. fo ciiorrect--t el---titian it 38 p csp�sad that the awnex "of--Lvt--B--and C �a Iierewih bents aid�lane-- a --tterhL—owner-- endorsement that Planning B--Bradley-o, ra l oval et W[) P g PP under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Owner _-_-Alf red-C-.__Bradley_andBarbara_A. Bradle-Y_______ Address _ 4Cross Avenue, Salem, Mass, 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor __ESseX__AUrv@y__Serviee - ------------------------------------------------------ Address______________________275Cabot Street,_-Bev_erly,_ Mass.___________________ 3. Deed of property records in I7sseX_South District __Registry of Deeds Book -----5358 ------ Page --426 -------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: __PCO—p—eM_is-_boUnded_-by_ Cheva1Avenue# CrossAvenue---and_High_-Street_ andconsists of__two single family wood frame dwellings. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. All streets and abutting lot lines shall be showryggre�lLa�n t ethe dth the nam of e One of the abutting lots. ���++��CC -�"�Y Signature of Owne - ---_"_V---- ------ ------ Address ____70_ Washington Street, Sal&# Mass, del h e N ber __745-3030--------------------------------------------------- * the parcel shown as .moo car: Hgh Street and Cross-street-are"" public ways with utilities. f1�t# of Salem, fflttssar4ttset#s 9� �• `s��e,�,E �Irmnix� �nttr� t �Jslln � �eag, �c December 129 1867 �eraln Y4. 'Malarthg �Iicllael Vaskstaski Titg PHIL ,Albert P. Vitcsff �ttlem, ,.1$iiassacllusrt#s Anumann?[. Alaeenev Honorable Francis X. Collins , City Hall , Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mayor Collins : The City Planning Board requests an appropriation of $12 ,000 . for the year 1968 , and submits the following itemized budget : Association Memberships $100 .00 Association Meeting Expenses 250 .00 Supplies , Office 300 .00 Supplies , Engineering 200 .00 General Advertising 1,000 . 00 Mimeo , and Printing 1 ,200 .00 Books , Pamphlets , Periodicals , Etc . , 300. 00 Planning Consultant , per diem basis 2,000 .00 Preparation of Workable Programme 1 ,000. 00 Preparation of Capital Improvements Programme 2 , 500. 00 Developmental Coordinator 2 ,000.00 Clerical 1,000. 00 Rentals , Etc . , Not office) 100 .00 Incidentals 50 . 00 $ 12,000 .00 Respectfully submitted, JMG: cc CITY PLANNING BOARD, Chairman Association Memberships. . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 100.00 Association Meeting Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . 250.00 • Supplies — Office. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300.00 Supplies — Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200.00 General Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1,000.00 Mimeo, and Printing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10200.00 Books, Pamphlets, periodical, etc. . . . . . . . . 300.00 Planning Consultant — per diem basis. . . . . . . . 2,000.00 Preparation of Workable Pro ,ramme. . . . . . . . . 19000.00 Preparation of Capital Improvements Proiramme. . . 2,500.00 Developmental Coordinator. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,000.00 Clerical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11000.00 Rentals.— etc N t Office). , ( o is ) 100.00 Incidentals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.00 $ 120000.00 s � Gielr_ /rD,-cAs.c co„- c�c X ctrrczr �/A � fGun rca ra r[ fr o aC e,�-r` u A.4 A'1d/N8<f /hCC NCw nGn. 00<� r ,lou F2aue. r_)C. Cac.< ,at ___ �iry HALL SA ( Gm l / ry CSA< vv rtrr � IK ,Qu i) fo�2/ATI G,J of /'zoa G �o .e rii c._—y_ L� e' I5'�By_ 4 v �2 CCC rF�c� Y f� /3 r+-! orrti) Ce rt' /' C �Pa !/ irJC � oxez U A ! /z -- l _•� 2w,2 �yCr. �c.0 rNC� C.4C C �s or f /�/�2c��'/21Ar, p_y !✓/ / Zau 6 . FaK / 4G6 . J /+�/f / Zoo n - 2c� xc <c4r �sr /�czc� fc in _curt ,eu0 Gwr of foo n _ - /Sc� �v nGtr �3c�wc Soo . - //Vl c2GAf4 If %V,'w AM rorr'.crI "i c re C.eO4L.tsrs �'si4 2GAforJ -r,—/D (d L ( 9G7 h utzy -- Ace--o c, ,. '-0& _r±e p C _�G rL i+c r> f_5'v-Qfri _r a r-t s v r 4 / C B . LSL_y_rT—/I_/_b_c7_C _• 2,C� t,rrrrc ' � . c�c�? c rt.r, .r �Tmwc �, y , �ona� n �rto ,v of rs.[ rc, o /NCk, pco CVA4cc --� stouArio� /�emgG2ru� r / OG . loa , " IV-C, /Log% Ctt u .- _u��/�_u ✓_CLIJCC_Rl1�C oz o o . N. OVLarr2saC / GUa Zaeo /vllmCu _. 6 Riwrs/.rG �aaa �.� l'CAI OICAC< ,�T�. 300. - AA N, 1 .—•��G4N_I.JLNG �,V�r�C r•-wV!- -_ — 26 U0 .___--. -�f BOG. � _-Z�(JG .-_ L + n�eI—AzZvucnwwr ��cY� ... rrSGO ` Nr, LUQ,-- a �_.�_T_ _._.___r_._______. ___._.�._____� �______ __ _. ______ __T_.____.•.. __ _-___a_�___._._____.._._____—.—._.____._-_-.�,._.-_ _.• (,/E✓GLGP ML4 rdL CU G .e O•.v.,,"t �,UGU k,7, +-, C1 ZCttPAc.S /—ATG. --- �NC.—RCA fO of po R J-4C RC QuG TrG-O-._ /A C2CCi ---a ARC CNG�<GL�—I�UG TG //_/N C2G ifC /!✓ T4C /rt/r,t_ M��K< .q _ Gu irk Au�S t"C C 1 r K .—. /• b�V_✓—R[ q_u�K_C_Ln_CCirY_/✓✓� uC-. .G">��1N9f0 _TC//C d2U. OF_ r4C CJOtZK OF CG/✓ SUllANTS. _ —• --,Z, ��GGu .4Cri.CN -r Int _rt.c �(/Q2KABCG / �o /jAn+✓r, A O b T u4-CAI--!o r.+—I- AIA NAu G RC.C_K /H C 2G A SS.4_/• _-.-_ __ _-3• Iy C ��/ _d-N_n_/�2G.�_2_G TC_N TA r/r�_CP Ct ruC / /nff. — Tt./` ISL•t.•w.t/ C. /3C: Ato - �TGCn y,5r r4 Ar )FA2c.�t+� ._. _____LV o 2K�r2�t �? u C�� E✓_�u_G.n�-BL-2-G_CG-R-[�F_L4P _ if �CAyr 4 t ?ec .- o 4? oe A4, � o r/ r /Gtd , �ll < ri A �C_? fdu Ccu lfc //�_v[ C.u�J r•�C1. /'ec � e .Z_O_c.4 A ru ,a �! ii/�S,,a C.l. rr ty C G_K C/La r / c a T tt C .ti C_c_u_%!u �_— ✓ 2 t /74C0GuCGv�, n, �i✓� /!o .�t/GQ/ Ty, � q_Ac. c //✓ �Gyrt _ C C e-o .2 Gtr I 1 I —�. Elc19lc_(I jlnrtyr /I tirr✓ortrry /i ACe�eo7_- Derr✓ C A GoT o_/_ T-r✓ter e>o�K . �< rr✓rr �£a vo . =/'9xa� tre Tin✓i it / zou<P r'iiC_/ CA.�.vu,.C_ G/ Rn 4/ ___ RCrrgRv 2Sc rOG /`Cr7�.Co MC•4 ✓' wrilortrrY T'41r _ k r• 13_C---'e_2-.� 40 r re, E r _;r4 e.,C , ✓/S r%wr Rinv_�t�!f A.C7LtAAY f'!t2.o— gY Gar 't "<' r,✓— I T lJ_6_li 4p—_A_G_r�V />[1_y_�•'+<•+r BY J_Y._C " rY T-u—r_4-C--- C_O_G.R-�_l--fig-v__u G2rI-.+•-C-•,-`'•- S: i✓�C.1�c__a F .� GZ.Ln �Gx—�u 2wc--G_o_A_n_ o u�Z C C C:Q K W U R'<f A C�S.^ r J'�'/_N/t_!I_4• /!U ✓.Q�� A7 o,-cc T-pwu OR 40✓ ///< _/Z n7--24-n-r_c 14_C—C R A N r,C2, N��C—rlL Ls Ek PC su_e r, v<. / f__f�rr /C-4 4 1-a Fe�� AT .1 1,/}re r-.. G_—AT j._o u .L__C y_u ✓r C u C G.-,— �_ ,� , I �t ? D2IIPITT� �CSFtLC�ttBPS John . (drug, �r. December 18, 1967 �eralb '[rCarthn Michael Vnehufuski CHU Pull ,Albert g. pitcsff Salem, Massachusetts paumoub A. 'Sfaeeneg Dear Councillor Elect : Confirming my invitation to you, I shall be very happy to have you come to my house on 54 Raymond Road on Wednesday, December 27, at 7: 30 P.M. I have copies of all pamphlets prepared by the Planning Board over the past few years. Very truly yours, JMG:cc 0 C PLANNING BOARD, C#AIR lV - _• _ _ �'N6rC — VOuCp—r�,_c�—��<._.G?t_C f��L r L —0-Al _ �-f,--- -- — f_��,L____-/� C-n V 4�N •G. _ �U A.4�-_..O_U-G.2—P_h_G—__0°.t t r f/G C�1_ y LR oGC—._- --- ---- --- —�/✓_2t<---- eo � c.a-- `�-ou _�Gke� SL eo�i.c,r° a,z �-� � -- -_ ���J >•.t G..._!wl_/�/_�o cJ t io^G 4 r' C .9 U_r. 2!_/?0�—_ _—__ ___--_—__ _-- -- lee -r !Z i-/✓G_ �'1-- ! ti � J t �—t---�--�----- ,Eti Cc:.u.�c..o ff�G<.��v 41 t, .4 ® DEBT SERVICE PROVISION BOB LOIN OF $1,000,000 - 20 YEAR LIMB REDNElfABLZ IN 20 ANNUAL PAYMENTS OF 450,000.00 INTEREST AT 3% PER ANNIM, PAYABLE SM-ANNUALLY DEBT BALANCE YEAR INTEREST PRINCIPAL TOTAL BYD OF TEAR Tear of Ilene 4150000.00 z $180000.00 41,000,000. let Year 290260.00 450,000.00 790250.00 950.000. Ind Year 270750.00 50,000.00 77,750.00 900,000. 3rd Tear 26,250.00 60,000.00 769250.00 850,000, 4th Year 24,75000 80,000.06 740750.00 8000000. 5th Year 23.250.00 50,000.00 73,250.00 7809000. 6th tear 21,750.00 509000.00 71,760.00 700,000. 7th Year 200250.00 500000.00 70,250.00 660,000. 8th Tear 18,780.00 50,000.00 68,750.00 6009000. 9th Io" 170250.00 50,000.00 67,250.00 550,000. 10th Year 16,750.00 60,000.00 65,750.00 500,000. 11th Year 140280.00 60,000.00 6 ,250.00 450,000. 12th Tear 12,750.00 80,000.00 620750.00 400,000. 13th Year 110250.00 50,000.00 610250.00 3500000. 14th Year 9.750.00 500000.00 69,750.00 300,000, 15th Year 8,2.80.00 50,000.00 66,250.00 250,000. 16th- Tear 6,750.00 600000.00 660750.00 200,000, 17th Teri 60280.00 50,000.00 56.260.00 150,000. 18th year 30750.00 506000.00 539760.00 100,000. 19th year 29250.00 500000.00 52,250.00 600000. 20th Year 150.00 60,000.00 50,750.00 Nme 4316,000.00 $10000,000.00 4103150000.00 1 DEBT SERVICE PROVISION FOR LOAN OF $1,000,000 - 20 YEAR LIPS •1% REDEMWLE IN 20 ANNUAL PAYMENTS OF $50,000.00 INTMWT AT W PER ANNUM, PAYABLE SWI-ANNUALLY DEBT BALANCE YEAR IBTUNT PRINCIPAL TOTAL m OF YEAR Year of Issue #170500.00 2 $17,506.00 $100001000. lot Year 340125.00 W0000.00 84,128.00 960,000. Rad Year 329378.00 50,000.00 820376.00 9000000. 3rd Year $0,626.00 500000.00 80,626.00 860,000. 4th Year 280875.00 50.000.00 780876.00 800,000. 5th Year 27,125.00 80,000.00 770125.00 7500000. 6th Year 260375.00 50,000.00 750375.00 7009000. 7th Year 25,626.00 60,000.00 73,628.00 660,000, 8th Year 21,676.00 500000.00 71,875.00 6009000. 9th Year 209126.00 500000.00 70,125.00 6500000. • 10th Year 18.376.00 50.000.00 68.375.00 500,000. 11th Year 16.826.00 500000.00 66,625.00 450,000. 12th Year 140875.00 50,000.00 640875.00 400,000. 13th Year 13,126.00 50,000.00 630126.00 360,000. 14th Year 110376.00 500000.00 619375.00 300,000. 15th Year 91625.00 60,000.00 69,625.00 2600000. 16th Year 7,675.00 500000.00 570875.00 200,000. 17th Year 6.126.00 50,000.00 666125.00 1600000. 18th Year 4 375.00 50 000.00 54 375.00 100 000. 19th Year 20625.00 80,000.00 520625.00 500000. moth Year 876.00 60,000.00 50,875.00 None $367,500.00 TrV0009000.00 103670500.00 • -`J DEBT SERVICE PROVISION FOR LOAN OF $1,000,000 - 20 YEAR LIFE REDZEKLBLE IN 20 ANNUAL PAYMENTS OF $60,000.00 INTEREST AT 4% PER ANNUM, PAYABLE SEKIMSONTHLY YEAR INTEREST PRINCIPAL TOTAL DEBT BALANCE END OF YRAR Year of Isma $809000.00 z $$0,000.00 $100000000. let Year 399Op0.00 160,000.00 59.000.00 9509000. 2nd Year 37,000.00 50,000.00 07,000.00 900,000. 3rd Year 350000.00 60,000.00 55,000.00 650,0, 4th Year 35.000.00 60,000.00 53,000.00 5000000. 5th Year 31,000.00 50,000.00 519000.00 750,000. 6th Year 29,000.00 600000.00 799000.00 1009000. 7th Year 279000.00 50,000.00 779000.00 6600000. • 5th Year 850000.00 500000.00 75,000.00 600,000. 9th Year 23.000.00 500000.00 73,000.00 550,000. _ 10th Year 210000.00 50,000.00 710000.00 500,000. 11th Year 190000.00 500000.00, 699000.00 4500000. 12th Year 17.000.00 50,000.00 679000.00 4000000. 13th Year 150000.00 50,000.00 660000.00 3606000. 14th Year 139000.00 600000.00 639000.00 300,000, 16th Year 110000.00 60,000.00 610000.00 250,000. 16th Year 99000.00 509000.00 599000.00 200,000. 17th Year 76000.00 500000.00 67,000.00 150.000. 15th Year 5,000.00 60,000.00 55,000.00 100,000. 19th Year 50000,00 50,000.00 53,000.00 500000. 80th Year 1,000.00 500000.00 51,000.00 Nose • J4209000005 11,000,000.00 $1480,000.00 r' \�� I J �ry�-1�••;:, ���.C!,!%l�i L/lf% C/d9lL//ll.1JI!/!l!%!' ,. ;i /OD X dual YAMef, aJJGU&M 02//-1 December 27, 1967 City of Salem Mayor' s Office Attn. Mr. Francis X. Collins Dear Sir: This isto advise you that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through its Department of Public Works has conducted public hearings on all remaining sections of the Interstate Highway System. At these hearings the Department , presented several schemes for each route through the respective communities. Subsequently, after due consideration, one route was selected and presented to the Bureau of Public Roads for approval. This phase for all the remaining sections of the Interstate Program is complete, and many are in the design stage. Our experience has been that after the corridor has been approved by the Bureau of Public Roads there are delays before the actual land acquisition. These delays are due in part to the magnitude of the highway program and the availability of the necessary funds. Consequently, the Department is forced to program the Interstate highway acquisition over a three year period. These delays in many instances increase the cost of the land required for highway purposes due to improvements by the owners. The Department in conjunction with the Bureau of Public Roads, is initiating a surveillance program in an attempt to prevent increased land acquisition cost within the approved corridor. In order to monitor this program effectively, the Department is requesting assistance from other local officials. We will formally notify the Cityrs Planning Board and City Clerk's office of this plan. We would appreciate your cooperation in this matter in directing other City officials, Building Inspector, Real Estate Board, and Board of Appeals to assist the Department in its surveillance. • -2- T would like to have it understood that thi program is not dc.- igned to deprive any owner of the fair market value of t;:e property. however, it is intended to prevent the Commonwerith from paying the enchancement or improvement value of the property after the public announcement of our highway location. f, representative from the Departmentts Right of Play Bureau will contact you in the very near future to work out all the details . The Department appreciates your consideration in this matter and hopes that we may expect your full cooperation. Very truly your. EDWARD .c .BBS COMUM S NER Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested /ie (Ua 'A'Kiluclmdeadl 100e/YaJ/., ./GeccG, &,w 0211-1, December 27, 1967 City of Salem Mayor' s Office Attn. Mr. Francis X. Collins Dear Sir: This is to advise you that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through its Department of Public Works has conducted public hearings on all remaining sections of the Interstate Highway System. At these hearings the Department presented several schemes for each route through the respective communities. Subsequently, after due consideration, one route was selected and presented to the Bureau of Public ��• Roads for approval. This phase for all the remaining sections of the Interstate Program is complete, and ,many are in the design stage. Our experience has been that after the corridor has been approved by the Bureau of 'Public Roads 'there are delays, before the actual land acquisition. These delays are due in part to the magnitude of the highway program and the availability of the necessary funds. Consequently, the Department is forced to program the Interstate highway acquisition over a three ,year period. These delays in many instances increase the: cost of the land required for highway purposes due to improvements by the owners. The Department in conjunction with the Bureau of Public Roads, is initiating a surveillance program in an attempt to prevent increased land acquisition cost within the approved corridor. In order to monitor this program effectively, the Department is requesting assistance from other local officials. We will formally notify the City*s Planning Board and City Clerk's office of this plan. We would appreciate your cooperation in this matter in directing other City officials, Building Inspector, Real Estate Board, and Board of Appeals to assist the Department in its surveillance. _2- • I would like to have it understood that this program is not de;+igned to deprive any owner of the fair m�lrkct value of the property. however, it is intended to prevent the Co;mnonwerlth from paying the enchancement or improvement value of the property after the public announcement of our highway location. G representative from the Department's Right of Way Bureau will contact you in the very near future to work out all the details . The Department appreciates your consideration in this matter and hopes that we may expect your full cooperation. Very truly your EDWARD BBS C011T, S NER Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested t• 1967 BUDGET & EXPENDITURES - - - PLANNING BOARD BUDGET FOR YEAR - 1967 $91000.00 CARRIED OVER FROM 1966: 7943 Boston Mimeo & Steno Service $ 750.00**' 8141 Charles G. Cowan Associates 19210.00 PD 6925 The Planning Services Group 10000.00 PD 18142 Salem News Publishing Company 900.00 PD EXPENDITURES - 1967 : ***$516.00 of this amount was canceled from Boston Mimeo and added to appropriation f03 JJ-1 Cameracraft Shop, Inc. the year. $50.00 JJ-2 Goldsmiths 36.00 JJ-3 Zoning Bulletin 15.00 JJ-4 Mass. Federation of Planning Boards 50.00 JJ-5 Andrew T. Johnson Co. , Inc. , 63 .75 JJ-6A Newcomb & Gauss (letterheads ) 9.50 JJ-6B Deschamps Printing (lg.envelopes ) 7.50 JJ-7 Andrew J. Johnson 1.80 JJ-8 Mass. Fed. of Planning Boards (4 Copies ) 40.00 JJ79 Newcomb & Gauss copies of forms A B C 75-00 JJ-10 Charles G. Cowan Associates (Historic Stdy36?-00 March3l Christine Callaha 187.50 JJ-11 Cameracraft Shop, Inc. , 100.00 JJ-12 Andrew T Johnson ompany 68.30 JJ-13 Share 's Stationery Store 50.00 • JJ-14 Salem News Publishing Company 706.50 JJ-15 Andrew T Johnson C mpany 63 .63 f� June 30 Christine Callahan 7 187. 50 JJ-16 Andrew T. Johnson Company 0 24.59 (JJ-17) The Planning Services Group 721.00 JJ-18 Municipal Year Book, 1967 I 12.00 JJ-19 Salem News Publishing Company 13 . 50 . JJ-20 Andrew T. Johnson Company 9.35 JJ-21 Cowan Publishers 185.20 JJ-22 Thomas Groom & Co.Inc . 7. 60 JJ-23 Essex South Dist .Registry 37.00 JJ-24 Newcomb & Gauss 83 .00 JJ-25 Andrew T Johnson 13 , 30 Sept . 30 Christine Callahan 187 . 50 Boston Mimeo, Canceled balance ADD5T( . 00 JJ-26 The Planning Services Group 1, 580.00 JJ-27 Salem News Publishing Company 20. 25 JJ-28 Planners Unlimited, Inc . , 120.80 JJ-29 Eugene Dietzgen Co. , Inc. , 350. 16 JJ-30 Dodge Building Cost10. 1!- JJ-31 R S Means Co . , Inc . , 3. 75 Dec . 31 11arrant Christine Callahan 187 . 50 Dae. )'r e t i n with R oa=d -A, rA pp-c -g�Y • JJ-32 Adirondack Chair, chairs ,file , storage 131u JJ-33 Salem Paper Co . wrapping paper etc 61.89 JJ-311 Jos T. Rosicky 22 . 66 JJ-35 General Office , typewriter ribbons 12. 3u JJ-36 National Cash Register, Adding Machine 95.uu a' Y f' 1967 EXPENDITURES CONTINUED: Bal. 3347.22 JJ-37 "Building Cost & Spec . Digest" $80.00 JJ-38 Frederick A Praeger 3 books 65.00 Christine Callahan, Increase 25u.uu - - JJ-39 Typewriter stand, approx. 30 . 00 3.x-40-JPlze•-P1a=±-ffg-Sere=ces-Greirp--- fge . . JJ-40 Andrew T. Johnson Co. 384.22 JJ-41 Christine Callahan Frt charges 6.20 JJ-42 The Planning Services Group 1, 553.00 JJ-43 Share ' s Stationery Store 13.05 d3�414-a�ytpCactP$$�E�$EIS��t�$A�-----------_$�� (Add. $5.00 to $95. for add.mch) 5.00 JJ-44 1 yr subscription Kiplinger 20.00 I JJ-45 Dinner at Hawthorne/B.A. etc. 70-'01 ,PY,r*`=�F�if:gi'ctg SeTv' ' =•s_F-&U-p--------br-0OOrG& 11-46 Planners Unlimited 145.90 JJ-47 Salem News Publishing Co. 9.00 JJ-48 The Planning Services Group 770.00 Hawthorne Hotel 85 .65 Boston Blueprint 8.14 TOTAL EXPENDED �9 463 95 (_Above figures not accurate based on requisitions some of • which were priced higher when invoices were received. Actual amount expended during 1968 for Expenses was $11.789. 59 �aa'.VP}�® ®?da �l 'a � ocamamaoanaa ' A�BEB-FEJ3dHS-{8ance3ed-part-e£-erder-to------56.99 I Bee ten-mime"-8c-8kene-Se-rvv� PE£XPENEEE_£YNDE=EflE-;95$-a-m---# ----�Es9�-- I i I 1968. APPROPRIATION - � - - - - - - 9 ,000. 00 ' Carried over from 1967 - - - - - - 3, 86-0.00 $ 12 ,860 . 00 Purchases - - - 10, 789. 59 2 ,070. 41 Clerical services - 0000.00 Encumbranees carried over to 1968 '' ' 070' 41 966 .00 UNEXPENDED FUNDS 104 41 •