Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1965-PLANNING BOARD
FCL OAO�l • # '- � v S i r s . l February' S; 1965; r ,JeTo the Honorable City Council - h _City .Hall - -Gentlemen The=Planning Board .of the City of "Salem respectfully'requesta°permission to use - " p th® 'Council Cbambers at City Hall for. ; ,, , as Public Hearing, to.be. held .Thursday evening, March 4th, -1965 at 7.30 P. M. ' 4 Yours very .truly;:' . • PLANNINGBG&40,, CITY,fOF 6 H ` } JOHN H. HOOPER, CHAIN- 77 AL rxa ,A y ell 11{{ia4± � ,N, lei > a 1 4• wa t r ,At L "� •''� tmYwa ?ts � 1 *� 1 40 x ' a14! 1 -• f r j tt"~ � �,• N�,. b 1 ' xj� ',�. of 'R, Y�+'�•:g�,�#+ 5�...t`�kT7�§'ak.�:kliWp�s�i.Y.. 'j rS � ( ..i s'+'_.'. a'•4.tr�t7.S�3}+q�jt{r""'R Fy�y. Y k {�)��x�°y7y.��l^x', -0 b r�t;"t��`{ty et/s{�PM''}'iR+ya4��a�'� '. �.,i �+ ; +.r{,� io fv(,...a W1ij A Ertl TE? f.�� •:,-. �.�,. . . . Y 1 R R r ce +iffss - w-. .' , c' .. , ,.. a ;i, �. .. q .r . sa.'R�• 8y b 6i' a',: i. t. f*"t., ate"` , ����3"34 k�r,3.� • P .'' � � , �.. � 2 X � �i Y� TJ4'IV)aYY�N T•'I.�� i'S4TA�li �°. . f K ^,y a, a � �v k s •C' r <V " It tt - d1 z f r 'T:• % y � M;r .4n't� a. 6 <k ♦ �1 � x a`4 f L, /P / fig - /werwD �l ti �i+ �rs.'Rd'' •�7f ¢.s�G".Sni;`-r,��,1 �tnr `, �.p i 1.e:rc`, rf1 I� 4 �....._......�_ _ 6 L '`• /OOr u 1 4• Giv� s t, C 4 E 'g 1 j 3 Altsi i EDWIN �� '� Sc�a/� /•,�.= c /Yo ���3' - T. EDWIN ter .r . x - 13RUDZYNSKI !$ T. !s'l.+ � BRUDZYNSKI sUR'4 i I RONAN & HARRINGTON FIFTY-NINE FEDERAL STREET JAMES T. RONAN SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS JOHN T. RONAN t MICHAEL J. HARRINGTON TELEPHONE 744-0350 $ I PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE - CITY OF SALEM Chapter 35 of the revised ordinances of the City of Salem is hereby further amended by striking out paragraph 2 of sub-section A of Section VMnon- conformity, and further by inserting after paragraph 3 of sub-section A of Section VIII the following new paragraph. "Provided however and notwithstanding any other provisions of this ordinance to the contrary an existing nonconforming building or use may be altered or enlarged in that use, subject to the granting of a permit therefore by the Board w, of Appeals as provided in Section And further, said Chapter 35 is further amended by inserting after Paragraph 1 of Section lKerthe following new paragraph. r "The Board of Appeals may authorize the issuance of a special permit for a change to another nonconforming use of an existing nonconforming building or use, or its alterations or enlargement, provided that the Board finds that the use as changed, altered or extended will not depart from the intent of this Chapter and its 'PR vV 117 Fs.b k prior use or degree of use;hhat such building or use is neither increased in volume or area unreasonably." L „'k P i .Y'*i= i eaµ ! Mr, Y ¢ •. is ' x x V.Js 4 ,:N ai Y •:P,! Y at^, �r �V y r : t *t Y Aix ..lt o f M+�fi 4 . .•x f TTT . a YY w -x "mow a.FF k + . 't atr. 8 ..t-e.tt;.¢. �y a,. E 'o �.. t a�.�"-��•�` .:.fir � t:y� a� S t . r �s .u...�.",ja, dr nA�i.�f*`fk �3. b'1 M.}L t KSS 1+�. >.WJJ� a� •-3., s fi i-nM ♦� r 1 wM 4� Y&i9G Y&eet, 'AJ t. 02108 May 10, 1965 TO: The Chairmen of the Boards of Selectmen FROM: Rev. 'W, Seavey Joyce S.J., President Mr. Robert 'G. Davidson, Executive Director The Metropolitan Area Planning Council, presently composed of 51 cities and towns, will be increased to include each of the 79 communities in the Boston metro- politan area. This expansion will include your community and came about with the enactment of Chapter 178 of the Acts of 1965 which becomes effective on July 1, 1965, The Planning Council is pleased to welcome your community to membership in our organization. We look forward to your participation in the metropolitan planning process and hope that we, in turn, can be of assistance to you in your planning activity. In order that we might have the opportunity to tell you about our organization and its objectives prior to the effective date of the act, it has been suggested by some of the communities in your area that an informal social get- together be held in the near future to discuss the Council with the leaders of the cities and-towns involved along the North Shore. We would like very much to invite you to a social hour and dinner: DATE: Thursday, May 27, 1965 TIME: 6:00 p.m. Cocktails 7 :00 p.m. Dinner - PLACEi Village Green Restaurant Route 1 Danvers, Mass. 4 ' -2- We regret that as a state agency we cannot provide the funds for such an affai; but must ask that we meet on a dutch- treat basis. We feel confident that such a meeting would be mutually advantageous to you, your community and the Planning council. May we ask that you return the enclosed postal card along with information concerning your intentions as to whether or not you will attend and whether other members of your Board os° community will be present. Thank you for your cooperation. Enclosure , Section V-A-6: Permitted Uses in B-3-and B-4 Districts Comment. According to the permitted uses listed, it would appear that no whole- saling is permitted in the B-3 district, and similarly, no retailing is permitted in the B-4 district. There is a type of use which appears to combine both in the same establishment, that is, suppliers to contractors. Examples of this type of use include Deland' s Supply Company, Silver's Plumbing Supplies, and Silver's Wholesale Electrical Supplies. On the basis of their operations, it is difficult to say into which district they would fall. Therefore, we wish a clarification on this point in order that we may locate the boundary between the B-3 and the B-•4 districts on the zoning map. Recommendation. it is recommended that such contractor-supplier establishments be permitted in both districts, provided that in the B-3 district this activity does not constitute over 50 per cent of the business carried on. P -Z6 3/, 32 34. 42 I Section VI -- Table 2: Density Regulations for Business and Industrial Districts Comment. In District B-3 the maximum lot coverage is 80 per cent, and the minimum depth of rear yard is 25 feet. Two points may be made about this pair of regulations, one regarding the great restriction on actual lot coverage and the other regarding renewal. In the first instance, 80 per cent lot coverage may be too extreme in a downtown location, where existing commercial buildings have infac.; covered 100 per cent of their lot, more or less. Even the addition of off-street loading would not necessarily reduce the lot coverage to 80 per cent, even where the lot was near the minimum area permitted. In addition, with a minimum lot width of 30 feet, a 25-foot minimum rear yard actually permits only a 75 per cent coverage. A 40-foot width combined with the minimum lot area would permit only a 67 per cent coverage, or even worse, a 50-foot lot width in a lot of minimum area would mean approximately a 60 per cent coverage. Thus there appears to be an inconsistency between the two provisions in addition to its being excessive. Regarding the second point, it is entirely likely that all of the B-3 district will be under urban renewal treatment at some time in the future. Such urban renewal treatment is likely to include large sites which will require a certain amount of off-street loading, but not up to 20 per cent of the lot coverage, and is also likely to have combined off-street loading areas to service a number of smaller establishments and/or smaller lots. Therefore, for this reason also, it is felt that both provisions are excessive. Recommendation. While the Planning Board may determine it desirable to retain these provisions for the unique lot whose building may be rehabilitated under an urban renewal plan, but which is destroyed or demolished at some time in the future, necessitating some strict controls, it may be possible to add a provision exempting these controls where planning is to be done by the Redevelopment Authority. Thus, these two provisions could be footnoted with a sentence similar to the following: These provisions need not apply where planned and integrated shopping facilities are proposed to be constructed, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board to ascertain whether the intents of the requirements have been satisfied. r Section VII-C: Off-street Parking Comment. It is not possible to decide whether commercial uses can be included within parking structures. In the Architectural Record, May, 1965, in an article by Richard C. Rich, it is recommended that when land costs go above $1, 000 per car space, commercial facilities on the ground floor are generally called for to defray the high land expenses. Recommendation. It is recommended that structures combining parking and commercial uses be permitted and be explicitly so stated in the ordinance. r Section VII-C-4: Design of Off-street Parking Facilities Comment. It is difficult to ascertain whether such design requirements are meant to include parking facilities within structures. If this is the case, the minimum dimensions listed may be too restrictive for certain patented parking structures. Recommendation. It is recommended that the dimensional requirements listed should not apply to parking areas in structures and that it be so stated in the text of the ordinance. However, in light of this, some provision should be made so that the intents of the dimensions listed here are fully satisfied. Section VII-D; Off-street Loading Comment. It would appear that the requirement for one loading space per S,000 square feet of gross floor area, plus one tractor trailer space for the first 15, 000 square feet of gross floor area, plus the requirements for additional tractor trailer spaces is excessive, both for the small businessman and the large entre- preneur whose establishment exceeds 30, 000 square feet. In the former case, a store 20 feet by 70 feet would appear to need two loading spaces, one for a regular paneled truck and the other for a tractor trailer. Similarly, in the second case, a store 150 feet by 200 feet would require ten spaces for panel trucks and two for tractor trailers. Almy's, which has approximately 80, 000 square feet of selling space on all floors, would require twenty-seven spaces for panel trucks and four for tractor trailers,compared with three spaces they presently have. In addition to being excessive for individual establishments, no provision is made for grouping of establishments to use one or more loading spaces where such establishments might be designed as a unit, although not necessarily in one ownership or one management. Recommendation. It is recommended that the requirements for off-street loading be made much less restrictive, using a sliding scale to.reducf- the number of spaces relatively as the gross floor areas of the structures increase. There are many zoning ordinances, for example Brookline, which have similar provisions. I is further recommended that stores below a certain number of square feet (as yet undetermined) be permitted not to have an off-street loading space, which provision exists in many zoning ordinances. It is further recommended that where establish- ments are designed, and/or constructed, and/or owned, and/or managed as a unit, special treatment be given such establishments for the purpose of calculating the off-street loading spaces required. For all three recommendations above, provisions similar to the Brookline Zoning Ordinance attached would be desirable. NORTH SHORE AREA TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE s ' The third meeting of the North Shore Atea . Transportation Coordinating Committee was held in Salem City Hall, January 2591965.. Represent1tives were present from Beverly, Danvers, Salem, Peabody, Hamilton, Manchester, Marblehead,Topsfield and Wenham; also - from the Mass.DPW; MBTA, and Metropolitan Area Planning Council. h Chairman Francis E.Dolan, Peabody, presided and opened meeting with summary of second meeting which was held in Peabody. This emphasized need for communities without public transportation and those not on lines now served by raillines for some means of connecting with public transportation. John Hooper, Salem Planning board chairman, spoke on confusion now existing on time schedules and connections between rails and rapid transit; also on m kWull Rmffimmmm need for central hub for feeder lines on North Shore, Stated Salem' s main problem over and above parking was proper arteries in and out of city; told of master plan in that city soon up for adoption, and spoke of the urban redevelopment project for down town business area in his city; stressed need for connector from new US 95 to Salem-Marblehead-Bever*y and the Lynn-Nahant-Swampscott; Outlined one of these under consideration, namely that to Vinan Square Highland avenue, Bridge street to Beverly bridge which would eliminate thethrough-city traffic now so burdensome within Salem. Chairman Dolan gave figures of inequality on fares examples being Boston-Salem, 14 miles , 40 cents; Salem-Peabody, 2 miles also 40 cents; yet can ride 23 miles on MBTA for 30 cents. Believes MBTA and B & M should be tied together on fares by transfer or some such system. Rep.Jerry Segal of Danvers spoke on need for Danvers interchange on Route 95 and urged group support this. r . FEB.25-- (2) Robert W. Bixby of Mass DPW spoke on this, describing latest route through Peabody & Danvers and the interchanges now under consideration. "while not completely determined, plans right now include major one at Peabody, but none until junction of Route One and present 95 at Danvers-Topsfield line. Ann Wood, speaking for Manchester told of parking problems there due to terminus of MBTA-Boston & Maine subsidy . , cpntract. Mr;.Williams, representing MBTA only recently ddded to planning staff there spoke in generalities of MBTA prgram. Spoke of recent study he had made of tranis lines in foreign countries. Selectmen Lawrence Lamson of Hamilton -B& M spoke of his town' s parking problems if MBTA terminus continued there. He believed long range plan should call for large parking area on Route 128 in North Beverly area to serve North Shore patrons of BZ& M. City Engineer Mitchell of Beverly told of his city's problems with through traffic along Rantoul and Cabot streets and the Gooucester crossing and Beverly bridge bottlenecks. Long range for through routes plans he believe should take this into consideration. Wm.Cahill of Salem, an interested citizen spectator requested information as to why the rail passenger service had terminated short of major cities such as Lowell, Fitchburg, Gloucester, etc. Delano Kennard, Wenham selectman answered this by explaining the MBTA act and its limitations ; also the fact the ICC had "short-changed" the MBTA by coming out with the decision to allow the Boston & Maine to abandon service about two months earlier than predicted, catching MBTA "short" . MBTA Representative Williams enlarged upon this , and pointed out how the 1964 Act had prevented at this time the utter confusion that followed Old Colony line shutdown. Feb.25 (3 ) Selectman William Abbott of Topsfield stated his community no longer expected rail service, but would use parking areas on rail lines. John Barrett executive director of Salem Redevelopment authority spoke of parking in Salem; redevelopment survey had shown 900 brinQibgg cars came into Salem daily dmm only 1800 persons , all of whom were employed in or about center of the city. Mr.Hooper expressed opinion state controls were over stringent and impaired flexibility in meeting individual community needs. There is little chance for experiment under state DPU and ICC regulations , and also in relation to economies of operation due to legislative action requiring manpower, etc. Mr.Lamson added to this with a direct verbal attack on union regulations that actually were the main cause in his mind of all the financial problems of the rails and other carriers. Chairman Dolan summed results of meeting as l.Peabody's problems are connector roads to Route 95, a wider Lowell street, and more transportation to serve adequate mmanlmmibm North Shore Shopping Center; Danvers needs connectors to Route 95 and better means of getting persons to rail lines; Topsfield 's problems are best served by Route 95 and 128 and closer connector to nail lines. The North Shore area needs a major distribution point to bring r together rail, bus and major highways. . Beverly, Hamiltm,Wenham and Manchester must look for larger parking areas near B &M if rail lines are to be used to best advantage. n r E t Alf i 4 f t a Jamary 5, 1965. To The Head of the Dapax tmeot Deas Sirs 2 reMectAaly ragdeat that you file a cape of your amuel Peps iss �liaate in this off£co osrs n before 9pwi3, 15, 1965. very t 'uly yours, s< d�.' My, VIV Qli#v ufax1Pln, ttss�zcixse##s ��"crMn,� �IMYCYCLIT$ �DMrt� i LOUIS E. BAKER,CHAIRMAN JAMES J. MUSE, CLERK -- -JOHN M. GRAY.JR. 3$ Q94=4 patreet RAYMOND F. SWEENEY. JOHN B. HOOPER p�AletS. �iRBSSBCijBBettB Procedure for Filing FORM A Application for Endorsement of Plan Believed not to require approval, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, City of Salem Section II - Paragraph B Plan Believed not to Require Approval . Any person who wishes to cause to be recorded in the Registry of Deeds or to be. filed with the Land Court a plan of land and who be- lieves that his plan does not require approval under tbe. Subdivision Control Law may submit his plan and application Form A (see Appendix) to the Planning Board accompanied by the necessary evidence :to show. that the plan does not require approval . Said person shall file, by, delivery or registered mail , a. notice with the City Clerk 'stating, the date of submission for such determination and accompanied by a copy of said application. If the notice is given by delivery, the -City Clerkshall , if requested, give a written receipt therefor. If the Planning . Board determines that the plan does not require ` approval , it shall without a public hearing and without unnecessary delay endorse on the plan the words "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law not required". The Planning Board may add to such endorsement a statement of the reason approval is not required. The plan will be returned to the applicant , and the Planning Board shall notify the City Clerk of its action. If the Planning Board determines that the plan does require approval under the Subdivision Control Law, it will so inform the applicant and return the plan. The Planning Board will also notify the City Clerk of its action. If the Planning Board fails to act upon a plan submitted under this section within fourteen days after its submission, it shall be deemed to have determined that approval under the Subdivision Law is not required. For full text of Subdivision Control Law see GL Chap . 41 Sections 81K to 81GG . Sections 6.13-6.20 81 (Section 6,13 continued) (1) Alterations or extensions aggregating leas than 5,000 (j) The preceding regulations shall not apply to parking lots square feet subsequent to the effective date of this By-law built and in use before July 27, 1962, which conformed to all do not require such provision of loading apace. applicable regulations in effect when established, except as follows: (c) Where retail, or other, stores are designed or constructed (1) Where parking lots are increased in capacity after as a group or as a unified building, the aggregate of individual the effective date of this By-law, the expanded portion stores shall be treated as one building for the purpose of calcu- thereof shall be designed in accordance with the regula- lating off-street loading facilities. tions of this Section. (d) Where mixed uses occur, off-street loading facilities shall (k) Parking lots for three vehicles or less shall conform to the be the sum of the requirements for the several individual uses regulations of this Section, with the exception of paragraphs (d) computed separately, except that such facilities may be less than (1) and (2), (e) (1), and (g). said sum by special permit from the Board of Appeals when it (1) Under a special permit after a hearing, the Board of Appeals can be demonstrated that such individual uses are not in opera- may permit in lieu of the dimensional requirements of this sec- tion at the same time. tion, where new parking facilities are being installed to serve (e) Off-street loading facilities shall be provided In accordance structures and land uses in existence or for which building per- with the following requirements for each type of land use except mits had been issued at the date of adoption of this By-law, the Uses 1 to 6 inclusive, as listed in Article 4: substitution of other dimensional requirements provided such sub- N stitution is necessary to permit the installation of some or all of Q the off-street parking spaces that would be required for a similar Number of Loading Bays Required for New Structures new building. By Gross Floor Area of Structures (m) At least 27o of the interior of a parking lot with 21 or more (in thousands of square feet) parking spaces shall be landscaped and continuously maintained. Over 300 Planting along the perimeter of a parking area, whether for re- t� (for each quired screening or general beautification,shall not be considered as addition) 1W or part of the 2%o interior landscaping. The landscaping shall be dis- Uses, 60- 100- 160- nctlon tributed throughout the parking area and shall include trees as well 2-15 15-50 100 160 300 thereof) as other plant material.Existing trees shall be preserved where pos- Retail trade sible. No planting bed shall have a width of less than 3 feet. d Wholesale and storage Industry 1 2 S 4 5 1 SECTION 620 OFF-STREET LOADING REGULATIONS S Communications and (a) Structures and land uses in existence or for which building C Utilities permits have been issued at the date of adoption of this By-law W me Mi :;hall not be subject to the requirements stated below so long as the kind or extent of use is not changed, provided that any load- Consumer gervice ing facilities now serving such structures or uses shall not in the Office building future be reduced below such requirements. Hotel and dormitory 1 1 2 3 4 1 (b) 1Vhere a structure existing on the effective date of this Institution By-law is altered or extended in such a way as to increase the Recreation gross floor area by 5,000 square feet or more only this additional Education s 1 to sl , gross floor area shall be counted in computation of the off-street loading requirements. yt :i l • Ir t p r P P P 4 P .r L� �'t' L`�' L`t• P� V- Plb P P �. X- r \J C• C r v � 4� �7'c`ioe�Jfirr�.fi, �oltani 02108 April 15, 1965 TO: The Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary of the various , Transportation Coordinating Committees within the Boston 4 metropolitan area FROM: Rev. W. Seavey Joyce S.J., President, Metropolitan Area Planning Council in association with Associate Commissioner James D. Fitzgerald, Massachusetts Department of Public Works. SUBJECT: Call of Regional Meeting The Metropolitan Area Planning Council and the Department of Public Works have agreed to call a meeting of the leadership representatives of the ten Transportation Coordinating Committees active within the Boston region. The purpose for such a Meeting 'is the desire to review the scope, purpose and objectives of the various Committees now in operation across the metropolitan area in accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding executed by the local communities and the Public Works Department. The MAPC is pleased to host this program, and a meeting of the committees' leadership is called for: TIME: 8:00 P.M. DAY: Wednesday DATE: May 50 1965 PLACE: offices of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, 44 School St., Boston, Massachusetts Attached is a tentative program for the meeting along with a listing of persons and agencies that will be present to comment on the need for Transportation Coordinating Committees and their vital role in the transportation planning and development process. We do hope that you can be present. Thank you. Attachment METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COUNCIL May 5, 1965 Transportation Coordinating Committees - Boston Metropolitan Area Meeting Tentative Program 1. Welcome .Rev. W. Seavey Joyce S.J. President, Metro. Area Planning Council 2. Intent, Scope and Objectives -Francis W. Sargent, Comm., of Transportation Coordinating Dept. of Public Works Committees - Memorandum of .James Fitzgerald, Associate Understanding Commissioner, DPW .George L. Wey, Director Bureau of Trans. Planning & Development, DPW 3. Other agencies and the .Theodore Schulenberg, Transportation Coordinating Commissioner, Dept. of Committees Commerce & Development . Gen. James McCormack, Chairman, Mass. Bay Trans- portation Authority .Gen. Rush B. Lincoln, General Manager, MBTA 4. Assistance to and cooperation - Donald Graham, Project with the Boston Regional Director, BRPP Planning Project 5. Administration, Coordination . Robert G. Davidson and Management of Transportation Executive Director, MAPC Coordinating Committees 6. Other Business A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S z "\ rl, 1 PEABODY •p•• { -�_=:`'� \` `,v � � RESERVOIR , \\`_ -_� / \ '�• til, -��( �` 'r .` C.ATHOLIC CEMETERY I •1 i1 I I' \+• \ 1, j1�pe •uutO ac)i I,II Yr,1�¢x ,`` E •� \�] HA RMONY GROVE _ \ CEMETERY 31 1cfu r ISI „I , c i I” r •� f,� x[ixWe b IMEPNWBEOE0.lYp0E w. �i5 q 1 Y/ 1 h -')' `/`._ P _ ' a - n r chtttx •l. TO >T � „o \�--__� i ~IT •�eT coot n ,eiA<,R 'vt T ; l , tc i,�'l - +a 'eI xoTl < - T /r+ GREENLAWN CEMETERY _TC_LYNN _ _ J i ♦+• s, 'aP��1 ;n+ �G�egk.! T.ti , �oa[nno "�i___��``i> �l exon T n �/� T L L /'-____£_ a,+Mytnax �, + T �SfL;�-e•�4;r'" .___--•��__eT. - 1/ PARR OMNI, e• ,' x •I E IL Tf IMP =;�_ ' ' %,I ya• v , ' ', ''% LLOR7-HILL- -- 1 . ` %'+leli •,�G %� PARR �' e,-, (//- '�+. '�•x,. 1. =J LI;f `\i l i lid •`` �>/ ;'^\ //,' \/ . ♦- .:� j '�< :e i � t O - ar. '� .� _ \_ ,��,,, 1 I I .�.? W/• y: l/ /•/4'f[,y ��- f C r. • l% ..'' , s . �, it , �f�{ • _ �� �/ 1 ivl 9 r<3 l r1 If • < Y y� Tw i. HIGHLAND PARK I t • „GL�t<' J -_.r ..;of $ � of � a� �!c e • �u.T o /� '� • © v o I MUNICIPAL • `' ( _ - , - - - SALEM — „ ii`// \\\\111 '.\ ] 1 GOLF T 1 TM. � / r if+i e / �.. � COMMONI- dNN`�I�r11VVVVI'VVV.. Q ^ L\ COURSE io. +i e - liu \.iT r `k o j ! ly't I JC ' Liu I _ � ✓ - i f s >OfToe • P w[ (Y4eP CCV M \/ v r - t /1� N ------4 yw \yalt0.Tnx / AAY%' _ / , .., eT 54 , q: At .� .� i� r N.av[P�• + '" z �i'•'xQ ��, I I I ��, •awfIn <, II 1```'�,�.V•V1141��1 \ � Q _:�='� T \ ((�'�_ /// i �. �:I`:. o .I� e•I 7 S aT'• I� r VJ III VJOLI`, ��l II 1� �� toy a �4 r � em m �wA 1 v To }a�iT >r�n ��.• v (�� Illl�l < �-_ tii ',E ,�� ,• ��-�Ti \ _���t +b x 8� < , 1to \O ZONING MAP t ;°f, )� / �I PREPARED BY THE PLANNING BOARD USES OF DISTRICT II - - CITY OF Le. $a •�" - �� . SINGLE RESIDENCE CHMM HISTORICALAIRMAN SALEM MASS. TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE x[n•Av„ ` "i FoeQ Ern-[�-eQ Attest: \• " - I P 12 �C. SCALE IN' FEET SEMI-RESIDENCE � •� BUSINESS O INDUSTRIAL APARTMENT HOUSE Cler is 0 SN IMD I= 200D Salem, Massae setts A B C D EF G H 1955 <,T, e e.P L M N O1, P Q R S City Clerk's Office Salem, Massachusetts ZONING AMENDMENTS ADOPTED SINCE 1952: Paper #599 June 11, 1953 - From General Residence to Business - Hersey St. and Forest Ave. -Second passage June 25, 1953, approved by the Mayor June 26, 1953 Paper #405 April 22, 1954 - Business operated by individual in own home in restricted districts. Second passage May 13, 1954, approved by the Mayor May 14, 1954. Paper #999 November 12, 1954 - General Residence to Business - Northwesterly side of Highland Ave. Second passage Nov. 26, 1954, approved by the Mayor Nov. 29, 1954. Paper #1179. December 9, 1954 - General Residence to Business- Vinnin Sq. & State Rd. "�- Second passage December 9, 1954, approved by the Mayor December 10, 1954. • Paper #433. May 12, 1955 - Zoning revision - Second passage July 28, 1955, approved by the Mayor August 1, 1955. Paper #419A May 9, 1957 - Pattern & Die Making - Boat Building - Second passage July 112 1957, approved by the Mayor July 15, 1957. Paper #868 September 24,1959 - General Residence to Business - Highland Ave., from Lynn-Salem Line westerly. Second passage October 8, 1959, approved by the Mayor October 9, 1959. F May 25, : 9c ; To ti?. City C:,;a¢xcI :ity i 4 a" i .7aSerh, R9ae:raac?rt��Lta G®ntlk�man UT thE� Council: I appoi.c¢t subject to council confiruation to the SALBk HISTORIC DISTRICT JrJDY COMMITTEE for tine terms preceding their n"Ou the following persons. For the term of 3 years expiring liar 31 , 2,"4 lagan A . Pales, Jr . 13 Washington 3q, , gales-Director of the Essex Institute Abbott Cummings 141 Cambridge St , , Boaton-Ea Secretary of the Society for the PrOcOrratloa of Now Ragland Antiquities Sumner Loa Raymond 39$ Lafayette Bt. , Salca-SalOm Attorney For the term of Z years Oxpirlag Bay 310 1963 Daniel Foley 11.4 Federal St . , $alOsi-Aertianiturist h Author Dortr^j Moore 37 Walter 6t . , Sales-Aeal gotato For Us term of I year expiring May 31 , 1968 Nicholas Xanthaky Is Sutton Ass . , Ulea-Teacher, Salm State College Charles R . P. Copeland 74 Washington $Cuero, Salsa-Librarian At this writing, I have rereisod Dominoes from only one of the groups suggested in the act. That group vas the Sores Institute, the local historical society, both of whose mWinees, I as happy to submit . The list as submitted contains ropreecatatises with backgrounds In history, antiquities, real estate, IsortieulturO, literature, educa- tion sad law. I recommend cosfirsatiop. Very truly yours, .4 �as nays F=/ah y. fli#� of *alcm, �RfC/ppNg AN�N.LI.L..x Ni ��N4iJ LOUIS E. BAKER. CHAIRMAN JOHN M. GRAY.JR. PETER C. MALKOWSKI JAMES J. MUSE RAYMOND F. SWEENEY Persons to receive written notice of Planning Board hearing on a petition for a change in the Zoning Map: The petitioner The petitioner' s attorney, if his name appears in the petition The abyutters to the property affected (The names and addresses of the abutters may be obtained at the Assessors* Office from Miss Roche . Uive her a copy of the petition. If a map. of the proposed change is filed with the Board she may need to see that also . The Inspector of Buildings, John J. O'Rourke City Clerk Toomey City Messenger i)ailAire Members of the Planning Board #_ :Also: Two copies of a nmmice of the hearing for newspaper publica- tion(which Mr. Baker will arrange for) . It is not necessary to quote all the petition in the ad. "hearing on a petition of John Doe to change from general residence zone to business zone a parcel of land containing about. . . . . . square feet ( if given] located at about 10 Blank Street, as more particularly described in the petition and plan which are on file at the office of the City Clerk. That last phrase covers the Board on everything) . The above notices and advertisements should be sent at least. . . . . . days before the hearing. (Consult Mr. Baker on this . I think there may have been a change in the law. We used to send them out seven days before . ) .4RY C : . i "MM- / r S List of ?.embers of City Plans Commission and the Planning Board. rfs�— J. Asbury Pitman 191.1- 1939 Harlan P. Kelsey 1911-1918 _ Francis A., Seamans 1911-1922, William F. Cass 1911-19I4 cLrcv �� i9a5 Alfred Audet 1911-1913 � qis Winfield S. Nevins 1913=1922 Joseph F. Appleton 1914 Frederick. A. Norton "1914-1917 , Harry P. Gifford 1917-1919 John U. Gray 1918-1927 David T.T. Little 1919-1923 Richard H. Wiswall 1922- 1939 Harry S. Perkins 1922-1938 Harry E. Webber 1923- 1934 Henry J. O'Donnell. 1927-1945 John T. Whitmore 1935- l4-44-1 Louis E. Baker 1936- 1963 Warren H. Bmtlenp 1939-1947 Edward E. Merri11 - 154o - 11n George P. Mann, Jr. 1141 - Myron R. Hutchinson 1947- 19'41 Benjamin H. Chatel 1947- 19 ,g 41 i tL AJ'nsh 0 Q ow. W - J } j Court Decisions relating to the Powers and Duties of Planning Boards General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 25, provides: Zoning Ordinances may be enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, convenience, morals or welfare of its inhabitants. The Planning Board serves in an advisory capacity and its duty is to make recommendations. Caires vs. Bldg. Commissioner of Hingheip, 323 Mass. 589. 1. The duties of a Planning Board are preliminary and advisory only. Town of Burlington vs . Dunn, 318 Mass. 216. In the case of Whittemore vs. Town of Falmouth, 299 Mass. 64, -- in discussing the word "recommmendation" and defining its meaning in the Statube, the Court said: "the word 'recommendation' in its context in this Statute connotes that advice based upon information and enlightenment elicited at a public hearing and upon study and reflec- tion to ascertain the wisest course fob the Town to pursue. It means that a permanent Board of Public Officers chose dutiesPelate to the study of means of improvement of general living conditions shall make a preliminary investigation�nd report with recommendations before the Town May take action. " In the case of Shannon vs. Building Inspector of Woburn, 328 Mass. 363, -- The Planning Board filed a report which simply said as follows: "a majority recommends the passage of the rezoning amendment for the best interest of the City of Woburn as a whole" . The report was attacked on the grounds that it did not contain detailed recommendations . The Supreme Courb said that the report was sufficient, that the Statute requires recommendations and not reasons for recommen- dations and we think the Statute was satisfied. There is no appeal to any Court from recommendations made by a Planning Board. The only Appellate action lies from action taken by a City Council or voters at a Town Meeting and these are overturned very reluctantly since assumption is in favor of the Ordinance. In the case of Lemarr vs. Commisiloner of Public "works of Fall River, 324 Mass. 549, it was said: it will be set aside only when the Court is x2myemx convinced that the Ordinance involves a mere arbitrary exer- cise of power having no substantial relation to these objects. In the ease of Town of Marblehead Vs. Rosenthal, 316 Mass. 124, the Court said: small business areas are often a convenience and sometimes a necessity in or near large residential areas. In the case of Shannon vs. Building Inspector of Woburn, 328 Mass. 633, which was the case involving a change from a residential to a manufacturing district so as to permit the Sylvania Electric Plant to be built in Woburn, Judge Lummas of the Supreme Court said: the chief purpose of the Zoning Statute iskhe promotion of the public J J 2- welfare. Every presumption is to be made in favor of the validity of an Ordinance passed under its enabling provisions . A zoning Ordi- nance will be sustained unless it is shown that there is no substan- tial relation between it and the furtherance of ANY of the general objects mentioned in the Statute . It, will be set aside only where the Court is convinced that the Ordinance involves a mere arbitrary exercise of power having no substantial relation to these objects. The objects being for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, convenience, morals or welfare of its Inhabitants. In this case the Supreme Court sustained the re-Zoning and the plant was built. Judge Lummas further said in holding the Ordinance valid and in considering the public welfare,"Woburn with its leather trade gone needs new industries to increase property valuations, decrease taxes and provide employment. This must be considered". In this case the Planning Board had recommended the re-Zoning for the"best interest of the City of Woburn as a whole". In the case of Building Commis$ioner of Medford vs. C & H Co. 319- Mass. 273, the Court said: a land owner has no just ground of complaint unless he shows that the provisions of the Ordinance a--s applied to him or his property are plainly arbitrary and unreasonable and have no rational relation to ANY of the purposes mentioned in the Statute. General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 27, says: A Zoning Ordinance may be amended to accomplish ANY of the purposes for which such an Ordinance may be originally enacted. t 0 nn U Z �Ac-I = Ll n Or 110 C, &k-\j L � i V\ I � -s S 'Ik w dC Salem Planning Board Roster - 1965 Resigned dabs-B,.-Ileepa�r-61aa ��aa---49-Fe��-B�--se4em--�e4--X44---��39 Bus. 744 - 1340 John M. Gray, Jr: Clerk, 54 Raymond Road. Tel. 745 - 0194 Bus. " 426 - 4993 Raymond Sweeney, 18 Chandler Road Salem Tel. 744 - 8292 ResignedL-------Ie1---744---4 69 4�A-Sx�i�le-SkpeeG----=-Sers---�e�r-�44---7869 Michael Paskowskij 20 Bow Street Salem Tel. 744 -7856 f Albert Pitcoff, 38 Dearborn Street, Salem Tel. 744 - 4362 Bus. " 744,— 4900 Gerald McCarthy 6 Lowell Street, Salem Tel. 744 - 0354 Bus. 744 — 6433 January 7 , 1965 • PLANNING BOARD - CITY OF SALEM Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board, Office, Thursday, January 7th, 1965 at 7.30 o'clock. Present : John B. Hooper, Chairman, Philip Litman, Raymond. Sweeney and Michael Paskowski Miniutes of previous Meeting read and approved. Form A Application of Allied Realty Trust of Salem, 70 Washington Street, Salem, Mass. , waspresented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To endorse Form A Application of Gerry W. Besson, 35 Marlborough Road, Salem was presented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To endorse Form A Application of City of Salem (Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer) was presented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: TO ENDORSE Communications received: Letter from the City of Salem , Public Property Department stating that to this date, no building permits. on Peter Road had been issued by ithe. Department . Letter from the Board of Appeals concerning Highland Avenue Nursing Home. Letter from George Vallis concerning Subdivision DiBiase Bros . On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To refer the plans of Patton Road and Quandrant Road to the City Engineer for his comments. • There being no further business to come before the Meeting it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: To adjourn at 8.45 P. M. Re ec fu1ly�sub7tted. w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jerk of *alem, fflassarhuse##s LMIiB AI✓`4.i.F'.1!{l jy YN1V 34 d1hurcl! j6treet FORMA o alem, Ittssttcl2useits APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., _-_.December_ 22---------------------1964 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ _there---is___no_Qhanpe___Qther---than__the---ralecatinn__s�f-_-a----d ht-_-of___way---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant _Allied_ Realty Trust_ of Salem _ -_---------------- Address --------ZO _WashingtonStreetSalem__-__� o__Beral_&_Be_rkal__ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor__Edwin T. Brudzynski ------------------------ Address -------- -------- Address __ __-Salta,_ Mass. s 3. Deed of property records in _________Es___sex_____Southern ___ ___ _ _-Regi try Book --------------------------- Page --------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: 361530 square feet located_ off Flint__ Street, Salem, Mass. ALLIED REALTY TRUST OF ALE Signature of Owner BY :-------- .��----- At rney • Address _ 0__Washington__Street,-__Salem,__Iliasa,________ . i � � - • � .•fir January11; .1965 4 F �. Thursday, January I 1965 a` 1.. P x � t,. �' a . F .a Xw� � � e• � , - 4 y "� j v.# I Allied Realty Trust <of 3alein,TO•Washington, + °<. Street;.-,Salem, Mass. !, ,T + ' 360530 wj.� ft. located off f . Flint Street; 'Salemi, Mass. f • • f s e - • *R {3 ,x. w - E f wy }F'R f rf • `` it � a' r 4 � [ j' l �r ,.h' F •; :l 1 }• f r a y rry fa ! ; "JOHN M. GRAY, .JR. '" k. vF n X # ,� « F :•�1•�. ` r rt �,. r . fr` t., e � _� e N c R y tM1r s , s k s t y t '�` 1. p I ;.:• � ,` R K 'Aryl .1 A p - t • ALLIED REALTY TRUST OF SALEM Necessary evidence showing the plan submitted in this application does not require approval under the Subdivision Control. Law - The lot shown was acquired by the Allied Realty Trust of Salem, and Deed and Plan, on which the endorsement of the Board, indicating that approval was not required, were recorded July 9, 1964 with Essex South District Registry of Deeds . The plan submitted is the same parcel,and the only change is that a portion of the previously shown right of way has been eliminated . and a new right of way has been created over the area marked thew Location Right of Way" . ALLIED REALTY TRUST OF SALEM By: \\ v Aftor4ey 01i#u of ttiem, '�fittssar nett#s ��'�� �lttnnirt$ �nttrd 34 dlh=4 '56freet FORM A �-aiem, Aaswchusrtts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., January---5-----------------------------19__65_ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- ---------------Ch-anRe---in---lot line __________ ____-_ __Change__in_lotlinebetween_ lots-_63__and_65___as__alz Qn-_____--_-_-__ Land Ld Court Plan 11802 B ---- � and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the u b Subdivision Control Law is not required. w" j • 1. Name of Applicant -------Gerty_We---BeSSOm. - - --------------------------------------------------- Address --------------35---Marlborough Road, Salem, Mass. ---------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _____W _$• Hi-lton- - -- -- and Son --------- - - ---- ------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Address 122 Bickford St. , Lynn, Mass. 3. Deed of property records in ----------- ------------------------------------Registry Book ------------------------ Page --------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ____35__MaT1bOTOUgh_R08d-__$$�gtp{ MaSB________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ---W-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- J O s L+.e W W ze H Signature of Owner ---- "V__/5 --------------- Address 16-AT- ___ January 11"; 1965 ' #Y. Thursday, January T, 1965 j a. -Gerry Y! Bessom 35' HarlborouRh Road, Salem 35 Itarlbor`ugh Road; Salem, Nass. ' •. � { { , / ^ i♦6 a '� ` ' � 1 .. �'j— JOHNM. GRAY, JR. • APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF P INOT E APPROVAL Dile one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section 11-B Salem, Mass . D_ec.23 .1�4 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivis- ion within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Lawt here- with submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant City of Salem (Neal B. Mitchell, City Engr . ) Address City Hall 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Edwin T. Brudzynski (for the City) • Address City Hall 3. Deed of property recorded in _So_ Essex Dts+ Registry, Book 4870 Page 110 e- -,.C.Burt. #651+6 4. Location and Description of Property: Corner and next to the corner lot at the southwest corner of Derby and Turner Streets belonging to the House of Seven Gables Settlement Association and from which a portion is to be convey- ed to the City of Salem for the purpose of effecting a widening of that portion of Turner Street. Also another portion of each lot is to be reserved for future conveyance to the City of Salem for further widening of Turner Street when such widening can be extended beyond these lots. Signature of applican Address Ctv of "Salvin, 'ffl2lssarh isetts • ';+ '� � g Pepttrfinenf of 13uklir Parke S �GNryYfi NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER December 23,1964. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: Attached find two plans showing a division of land at the corner of Derby and Turner Streets , for the purpose of producing a present and a future widening of a portion of Turner Street. Since these lot divisions are for the one and only purpose of widening that portion of Turner Street, as shown, and the lots intended to be transferred for that purpose are too small for any building, it is believed "not to require approval" . It is the request of the City Solicitor that the total widen- ing be made in two separate conveyances, because the remain- ing land is expected to be used as a bus terminal by the owners, and he does not want the City to be liable for damages on land that cannot be immediately made a part of Turner St. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer Encl. Application for indorsement (Form A) R S F Ff_ ` r r January ll-, 1965 �. a • January7'0 . 1965 City :of Salem, , (Neil B. Mitchell, 'City Bngr) V s Corner lot at the'corner°of'Derby $ ' & Turner Streets ' ryY -",4870 110 ' S 27 L. 'C. Cert ; '-#6646 b *_ JOHN M. GRAY; JR. a_ i ♦ M' R i'urm C-In G2 IOM i N , C�E�,C4�U1T,lA.O { 0 � CLT'Y OF SALEM fn City Council, ""WnnSx r' Ordered: L f J �,. . 1I+t7//1 e : (Iip�( nii.ir��C� /- J A h 'I'n C'itT"�Gounril i'I�r�nlhs+r 1(1_ lQ��u AA�roved by P4a�Tor. December 23, 1964 = Ari`EST: —. a Form^�-10-56.3M , CITY�'r OF SALEM X In City Council'...P.M*'-.---.'T-------- Ordered:' y � 44k 44 Al tLl l'71 4g R k t4 S�-Yi k j Ru� • _ y Adopted Retuwlled uns$ pd hi> the Maynr nn nrt_ 22, 196' — r -rs. W ivvaaYY...+�u.ey.��++�+�n+✓Yr. • - Wuara.n WnLuiraJur�au+W.++a.�.W+4,....v..r+.:...n��v..r..ww.c' .. ..r-Y�..�_.._...—�...�....�.......r..,mss..—...�..�...__"�"S .rr..r�.�.iY...r.wr_u.vL�-.�.a.e.n�...+rwr.w..�.�w,�.v�.ice•... � `: , IV r .December 22 1964 ` The6Ron. wFrancis S. `dollin_s City Rall Iv Salem, idass. Dear Mr. Mayor $ i ' The Planning Board `of ;the ,City of Salem, E • ` requests an appropriation of $2400400. r for the Advertising of the new. Zoning , Regulations an8 Mapj 'in, the :Salem News. L. This appropriation' is necessary in order • ` '' ;• to have the Zoning advertised before the' middle of the year: - Respectfully, PLANNING BOARD$ CITY OF SALEM JOHN B. HOOPER, -CHAIRMAN .. L i ` S . ! 3. - T + ' �Aa _FJ } w� '� sy. 4 s.I.' ' ti y' E • y a �-: a• � t� . . .M1c • F e. .. I � "� N J 'ryx' N 'f J :i•e '} F r'" } December 22'j 1964' ° .. �. F> - A4 f Imo. ! ! T- •` .5 '��� A a y �• iG„ f r R �a Ae " The}Hon _Francis 8.' Collins ' Salem, )dans• S• E 4 t �t ) ,a.� , t. r 3.. 'Dear:Mr. Magor, The Planning,Board:=of the-CityJ_of, 3alem requestrfl thenfollowing appropriation for-,the year 1965 , 1 d .e. -. ♦.., !r _ - y -sf . rytA. 1 .:Sar'.: . A Expenses: letters 'and:.mailiag 4. $150.00 , v Memberships-Associations 7b.00 ' General Advertising ` (Subdivision etc. 0.00 a d0 -Clerical(30`Meetings & z , .Hearings) "450:00 e a Drawingsrand Blueprints . 800.00 -7875i u A 5 '_ .. � + Y iT . t+m ,� , ` ' `j '•.: y.. M} _ rs ••.� x *' .�4: Respectfully submitted, r , ° t � °' .r s •. f -� is PLANNING BOARD,, CITY,OF SALEM ;L y Fn �. ;TOHAT •B. :IIOOPFR, ,CHAIRMAN`w }r•p 3 °i M1 ` } 1 _ t '•Q�i Y.r4 �IY I.' 4 _ab y A a • l t f a a+ . �' F 1T q i i •x � y 4 a a i t . NORTH SHORE.AREA .TRANSPORTATION;COMMITTEB•- _ to T January ,ll, ; 1965 ` To the Hon City Council City Hall f, ?. Salem, .Hass . . Gentlemen. P � � . - + The.North Shore Area Transportation- a <w " « - Committee respectYul2y requests- per= a ' ,r missionto-use iheACouncil -Chambers3 " at. City Half for- a ..Meeting on Monday, •,-p "" `January 25th, 1965t, 4t 8 o'clock: P.'M: ; .r M Yours very truly., JOHN B. HOOPER,r'VICE CHAIRMAN c NORTH, SHORE AREA,TRANSPORTATION t7 ., COMMITTEE- i • - p n ` , a BARRY W. PLUNKETT ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS RES. a ADELINE RD., BEVERLY FARMS AREA CODE 8t7 AREA CODE BIT TELEPHONE 7E8.9090 TELEPHONE 991.8487 January 15, 1965 City of Salem, Massachusetts Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass, Gentlemen: , am enclosing herewith completed Form A together with linen and copy of Plan entitled "Plan of Land in Salem Property of Ernest Belleau, Jr. Realty Trust Scale: 1" = 40' July 6, 1964 Essex Survey Service 275 Cabot St, , Beverly", for your attention. A copy of this Form is being forwarded to the City Clerk today. Very truly your BARRY PLUNKETT BWP:N6M Encs, ay . •gµ Ott Iw r d :4 v it, - ab A It It et It <A r _f rFr January 22nl965 ' 1tr. Barry. c Plunkett `K 70lashington $treat ' - 4` - ' Salemi a , � . .i +' 1 �{ +` a .. � • - t. Dear Sir. ' � aThur®daq, January 21et,1965 December 22, 196E Ernest Belleau, Jr. i ` land in Saiem . Y I It " • t< .eA :A a n R A M d 4 _.•` �.-- W y +j)pF �'a( b s # st ksd 4 r • �4, p_ J ' - • Forma and applications were incompleteJ� M a1 1 1' fp Y m Qli#v ofIPm, � cltse#t� G_ Planning Planning �Ioura LOUIS E. BAKER,CHAIRMAN JAMES J. MUSE, CLERK JOHN M. GRAY;JR. _ - 34 (ffIlRrttl p treet RAYMOND P. SWEENEY JOHN B. HOOPER - Salem, Alassathnsetts January 220 1988 Nr, Augustine J Toomey city. Hall Salem, Nass. Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on Thursday, January 21st 1863 it was voted: - To notify you that your application under Form A dated December 22,1984, lrilest J. Belleau Jr, for determination and endorse- ment that Planning Board dpproval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required of a plan 8ssex Regisitry Book '5045 Page 381 is hereby denied for the reason that it isnot accompanied by the necessary evidence to show. that the plan does not require approval as set forth by Section II, Paragraph B of the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations of the City of Salem: You may submit a new application Form A complying with the Rules- and Regulations and such new application should be dated when it is submitted. Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS LEGAL DEPARTMENT ALFRED A. DOSROSIELSKI d A ' 125 WASHINGTON STREET CITY SOLICITOR SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS umu< January 15, 1965 Salem planning Board Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Re: Country Shore Corp. VS. Augustine J. Toomey Gentlemen: I am enclosing a copy of the Findings and Rulings in regards to the above entitled case. John M. Grey, Jr. makes a good witness. Very truly yours, Alfred A. Dobrosielski CITY SOLICITOR AAD:sls Enc . COM40,W RALTH OF W SSACIME r'TS 1S5SFJC,as. SUPERIOR COURT No. 129739 COUNTRY SHORE CORP. r VS. _ AUGUSTINE J. TOOM ' 1'INOIT4a3 and 1ttT VI S ' 1. petitioner (applicant) Was at all material times and still is; a corpor- ation and the owner of land as alleged in the petition, and one James l Pantapas (plaintiff) was its treasurer. B. Defendant was at all material times and still is the City Clerk for the city of SA10m (clerk). 3, , on November 200 1963. plaintiff (on behalf of applicant) filed with ' t the, 9alem Planning Board (board) and with clerk an application for approval ,. of a definitive plant of property as a subdivision "under the requirements of the Subdivision Control` Law and the Rules and Regulations Governing the Sub- division of Land 'of the Planning Sward in the City of Salem". Said applies- tion related to applicant's land on Hilton and Belair Streets off Belleview Avenue. There is no evidence whether or not any list of names and addresses , of abutters of the land in question Was attached to the application. 'there is no evidence -whether or not at that time the board had adopted any Rules s and Regulation os, if so, what they were. u6t'uvotir,.o was:"givens bj t1-,e-board of a public tearing on said applica- tian to be held rn► December 190 1963. J 5. F On C18cember 19, 19630 a public"hearing was held in the 'Salem City Council Chamber. About 25 or 90 persons were present, including plaintiff and applicant's attorney (.the attorney). Plaintiff presented a redrafted, plan conti►ining certain additions. At that hearing, the board pointed out oartain deficiencies in the proposed plan of subdivision and requested that .. several changes in layout, etc. , be made. �Ilaintiff, through the attorney, agreed (on behalf of applicant) that action by the board on said application be postponed to some indefinite time in the future to enable plaintiff to ob- tain and supply additional data requested bt the board as set forth above. After adjournment of that hsaring, the cha-L-nan of the board wrote a letter to the attorney enclosing a list of the dee-cieneies found by the board in the plan submitted with said application. 6. on January 30, 19640 a special mees,-`ging of the board was held, attended by several persons, including plaintiff and the attorney. The board then re- viewed, "article by article", the list of the board's objections to said plan, which list had been prepared by the City Engineer following the December 19 meeting. Some of the problems were solved and some were not. A problea of drainage was ofparticular interest to the board. That meeting adjourned, ileav- r tag the application still in abeyance pending further possible solutions to be 4 proposed.by the plaintiffthe attorney thereupon wrote to the board regarding. ,1 n ns f'a ob eCtions and pivino answers to some of the board's claims regard,- rs ,rb�a9i-a.ii�,ia.N+�n'aiP'4s�d+R,a .h� �sV Y r . 2; i� deficienc;eS in the ylan• •' 7. 11kta wa.tor wai taken up again by the board at its meeting on Febru_ wry Zoo 19649 at which' plaintiff and the attorney were present to discuss ftirthes modifications of the plan. It was agreed between plaintiff and the i Sys<, hacst+d that 'certain corners can the proposed plan be rounded off, that surface ." drai ' b@ added,�and. other changes made,4 rhe board at that time decided to f� advnztise.a fu#ther public hearing to be held on March 19, 19640 the date for Chs postpone¢ public bearing hold an December 19, 1963. March 19 1964 the aboard met, and it was antwunced that this meet- {,,, ing,woulf 000$i49rfurther the application, considdra.tion,'whereof liad Wensuszm i nd8dat the Wcember '19 ,meeting. The attorney announced that he was. attending ' - the.6eetinq without prejudim to applicant's position , that, the board having arc ' * ,¢ ailed to either take final action on the application within the statutory, �a•/ 1Ja�'kt .I' - 1 s' period or eoithh ttiaE time t0 file with the clerk a certificate of such action in on, the`plan and applicant not having requested arriting an eaten®ion of time,. j • (and 1 find that applicant dive not so request), the application must be deemed to have been approved by the board under the statute (General Iaws ('Per. ad- ) c. 41, $. 81U). lbe matter was then taken under advisement by the board. z 9. Phe board at its meeting on April 2, 3,964 voted to deny approval of the application for the reasons stated in Rxhibit C, appended to the petition, t' which is a letter of notice e,f such action to applicant dated April 3, 1964. Word of such action was coam;unicated to the city clerk by the board by tetter i also dated April 3.' 10. On April 6, 1964. the attorney wrote to the clerk a letter (8xhibit 1) demanding that the clerk furnish a certificate that the board had "failed to take final actions on said subdivision plan and that �statutor approval re- sulting from such failure has become final". The clerk i9nored 'said dtmand,. V and on'JURO g, 1964 this Proceeding was brought, ' 11. 1 find that the successive delays by the board in taking final action t x' t,a.4� E:Aetµapplication were spxe+ly fer the purpose of affording applicant full e}r. ' v Mrtunity €-� �t ss- rwa_ JaCtlons advanced by the� board.,,in accordance with &p- requests. s 12 1 rule thato on the facts above found and inferences to be drawn r+ therefrom! ! �� defendant was not Ob'ligsd, unser the,statute, to comply with a, plicant fir Said dsand I and that for this and other reasons the petition should r 6 4.hd hereby is dismissed. ;. rJ Just ce of the S� :, � aper or' C , 1, 1965. - ^ f } p5 •' y T A TRUE C PYr n, > • + ATtESi CS.:i ASSIST NT CLERK 4 i i. et f 4+LpiplT..�o' — @ltty of *alrm, 'Massy rouse##s ] p • a „ .r (o{fTT:E of t4E EQItv @Ilexk I ,epxlxLOp� t9 �.ugus#ine J.$[aameg Qitg QIlerk January 18, 1965 Mr. John B. Hooper, Chairman Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sir: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, January U. 1965 the enclosed Order was adopted and approved by the Mayor on January 18, 1965. Very truly/ ,n i� 4USTINEJ. CMEY CITY CLERK .rJ fi Fu"A C--10 Q-IoM - - - P CITY OF SALEM sIn. City Council, H60IpIlYF�lD � Ordered: ,� U1 ell C ci�1 fr f January 21, 1965 • PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board Office, Thursday, January 21st, 1965 at 7.30 o'clock P. M. Present : John B. Hooper, Chairman, John M. Gray, Jr. , Philip Litmane and Michael Paskowski. Minutes of previous meeting read and approved. Form A Application of Ernest R. Belleau, Jr . 125 Canal Street, Salem was presented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision under the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: Not to endorse as the Forms and applications were incomplete Mr . Angelo Trovas was present and requested a release on Lots six and nine on Dundee Street. The request was tabled awaiting a check with the City Engineer, Neal B. Mitchell Form A Application of DiBiase Bros. for subdivision approval • for streets, Middle and Valley. On motion duly made and seconded it was Voted: To return the application without prejudice and asked them to submit a Form B application at the next Meeting. Report on the case of Country Shore Corp. against Augustine J. Toomey was read and the finding was in favor of Mr . Toomey and the Planning Board Letter from Vinnin Sq. Neighborhood Asso. read and placed on file. Letter received from the City Council regarding Orleans Avenue flooding conditions. Since the Avenue is not an accepted Street and does not come under Subdivision Control Law, the responsibility is with the Owners of the land. Letter received from the North Shore Transportation Company that a Meeting will be held January 25th at the Council Chambers, City Hall. Received notice that the $2400.00 requested for advertising for Zoning was approved by the City Council. Copies of the final draft of the proposed Zoning Ordinances presented and distributed by Mr. Gray. Notice of Meeting to be held February 15th concerning Derby Wharf Development read. There being no further business to come before the Meeting it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: To adjourn at 9.30 P. M. January. 98 19600 a To`The Honorable City, Council t . City Hall R Salem, Mass`' _ r" -Gentlemen: ° In the matter.offlooding condition's "of Orleans 'Y ° Avenue which was referred by you: to 'the City' ' ... of Salem Planning Soardofor advice-on the ' ' City's obligation:' the Flanning.,Board reports. - as follows: 5 "Th'e, land as yethas iot been. 6roughi',before ; the Planning Board as a 'subdivision under: . ' the Subdivision Control Laws nor has the • a ° u Street .been brought before the Planning `Board for acceptance outside of 'the' . '' `Subdivision Control; Law." i Tinder thesercond tions the- City has no responsi- bility vnder .the present Status. ' Respectfully, , .. ,r a -: • - — ' PLANNING`BOARD' CITY OF SAI M.' ^ t, to JOHN B. HOOPER* CHAIRMAN y " xon. •..r+%o. ..' ;P CITY OF SALEM �' .�.l nal ill t`I r (� ro hiawor X17 �.I�V' (�(IUIICIir . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (.�: . . . Ordered the surra of Two Thousand Four Hundred Dollars, ($2400. 00) be and he rcbv from "REVENUE"' to Cho "General Uoverrrpient" item "Planllinb.__ —� —_i3oarrl" sub item "Aclvl;r.tis,ing. l n :i"y ,,rm1S; i° 11f1c u n(J) tura —L 1raUV JAN 18 1968 "1)i.}', . T'. Y ,♦y d L .,, +y', r 41 r IV ''.w. .y : • it - � y y 4 �.: I .;s : r rr < bomay city 1411s } �Al®ID ^-1�3eE{• cY t i : of .v , °g .,y f. gear Sirs ` }, , y •, �,, . is ThursdayFebruary dth,1866 Jan iaaryt88thy1966 Laierence'J.moyalhaq19 verdon fit. \ - Pr9porty,'6 Ysidon 'Street ; 41 Y a t Porm did noC have sut'ftoient intormtioa + :. No linen submitted an required. . `y♦ � rt•P (fli# of *alem, Aassar4use#ts • '. r° a r_ P9PaMxa vo+�. O{�ttE of tI�P. �ltY�t (iIleYk 19 �ltalffi:tt[2�. ��011[CRt �itQ QIlark January 18, 1965 Mr. John B. Hooper, Chairman Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sir: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on January 14, 1965 the enclosed Order was adopted and approved by the Mayor on January 18, 1965. Very/truly yours, n AU TINE J. CITY CLERK \ CITY OF SALEM , In City Council, Ordered: L-77-1 F1 f _ Baa ,1— C C - f Jill 4 t tj1 f C t L f7 f: of �$alcm, fflassar4usptts • �9 °.,a .;� � �ixblir �ru�rer#g �e�ttr#meu# 1�ttniel�. Vprieu, In, 56upc. January 27, 1965. Roam 7, @Iiia pull Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. , Planning Board, City of Salem, . Massachusetts. Re: - Building Department Forms. Dear Mr. Gray: Thank you for your letter of January 25, 1965• As you know, I took office on the first of January, 1965, and I have not been briefed on what has transpired on this subject prior to that date. I shall have to acquaint myself thoroughly with all phases and aspects of the present and proposed forms and Code before I would be in a position to offer suggestions. Very truly yours, DJOB:cc nspecto Building. • FORM C APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLAN File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section III-B. ew�o W Cjg 0 N Ca o Salem, Mass. , February 4 19-65 T c Tn�tjtianning Board: h a m >_N Tie i�idersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property Located in the City of Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules and Regu- lations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City • of Salem. 1. Name of Subdivider DSBiase Brothers. Inc. Address 25 Acorn Street, Malden, Massachusetts 2. Name of Engineer or surveyor Carter & Towers Engineering Corp. Address 6 Fairview Avenue,_Swampscott, Massaehusetts 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry, 4245 303 Book 5149 Page 53 ocument 111923 recorded with Land Court Registration 4. Location and Description of Property: Office Approximately 38 acres of land located at the rear of Ord Street and Valley Street nater owner DlBiase Brothers, Inc. by its Attorney • ss Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is at- tached. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. l GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW • 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS REB. 89 PLEASANT STREET TELEPHONE ]94-21]3 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1188 December 19, 1964 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Subdivision of Land DiBiase Brothers, Inc. Gentlemen: In regards to the above-captioned matter, it is requested of the Planning Board by the Petitioner of the proposed property to be subdivided that the following requirements of the Sub- division Regulations be waived. • 1. Section IV A (1) (h) - "Property lines at street intersections shall be rounded or cut back to provide for a curb radius of not less than thirty (30) feet. " It is requested that this requirement be waived only with reference to the entrance at Ord Street for the reason that the adjoining property to Ord Street is not owned by the Petitioner, although efforts have been made to purchase this land in order to remedy this situation and conform to this requirement. 2. Section IV A (1) (f) - "The minimum centerline radii of curved streets shall be two hundred thirty (230) feet." It is requested that this requirement be waived only with reference to the street bounded by the property shown as Lots 70, 719 72 and" 73 which has less than the required centerline radii; however, it is submitted by the P6titioner that this is a part of a street intersection and therefore does not fall within the requirement of this section. `Nevertheless, the reason for this request is to locate the street within the valley and thus avoid the nearby ledge. 3 , Section IV A (2) (a) - "The minimum width of street rights-of-way shall be fifty (50) feet. " • It is requested that this requirement be waived and that the Petitioner be allowed to construct street rights-of-way • Planning Board -2- December 19, 1964 of forty (40) feet. It is brought to the attention of this Board that an attempt has been made in keeping with good planning and design standards by the Petitioner to locate the streets in the hollows of the terrain in order to avoid as much as possible the ledge which is prominent throughout the property. A waiver of this requirement would greatly minimize the amount of ledge blasting which will have to be done. 4. Section V A (4) - "Granite curb and gutters shall be installed not closer than thirty-six (36) feet face-to- face. " It is requested that this requirement be waived and that the Petitioner be permitted to install .Bituminous Curb not closer than thirty (30) feet face-to-face for reason of the prohibitively high cost of installing granite curbs. It is respectfully submitted that virtually every development in the Essex County area contains bituminous curbing with satisfactory results. It is hoped that the Planning Board will consider • these requests for waivers seriously and act favorably upon them. Very truly ou , Joorge Vallis, Attorney r DSBiase Brothers , Inc. GPV/ijp CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. /JouneeC//and /�/ �/� erorf6 JOSEPH D. CARTER — — JEFFERSON I-2550 Survey6, C.. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGR, a LAND SURVEYORS PEABODY. MASS. JEFFERSON 1-2880 1 _ December 16 , 1964 8 FAIRVIEW AVE. _G SWAMPSCOTT. MASS. 582-8388 Planning Board 34 Church Street - a Salem, Mass. SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF LAND, ;VI, ✓; ,i'', +'' %.i.'; DIBIASE BROTHERS INC• Gentlemen: In response to pour letter dated December 97 1964, we have taken comments by the City Engineer, Neal Mitchell, into consideration and submit: 1. All filled areas in which utilities are installed shall be mechanically C compacted to maximum compaction in six inch layers. 2. Although the entrance on Paula Street does not meet the City' s standards every effort has been made to purchase land in order to rectify this situation. Also, it should be noted that all entrances are comparable to other streets in the area as Summit Street which abutts the property is approximately 20 ft. wide. 3.. We are aware of the condition of the drainage on Abbott Street and it, is our contention that we shall not, provide additional loading in this area. Although the plans specify for some loading it shall not be additional to that which already exists. We have revised the plans to divert a brook and a major portion of the storm drain- age away from this area and to be conveyed out the natural water shed located in the Valley Street area. 4.. Due to the topography and nature of the land it is in the best interest of economy to install the water according to the conditions encountered in the field. We ask the indulgence of the Planning Board to allow us to submit a final plan showing the location of the water as in- stalled. 5. As previously mentioned above, the drainage on Amita Road and Valley Street discharges into a natural water shed which flows under Highland Avenue. 6. In reference to lots 6 and 7 no house shall be built on the sewer line. Lot 7 shall be redesigned on the final plan to provide easier placement of a house on the lot., CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING COST CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. /JounEel D and /`e/ [• porb JOSEPH D. CARTER - - JEFFERSON I-2880 �urvep, C,}��'`�� REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENOR. 9 LAND SURVEYORSPEABODY. MASS. JEFFERSON 1-2880 6 FAIRVIEW AVE. L_ SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 852-8386 �IV4 ✓ if ti; I ,,II,' 1,•\ty i4 A �I. \.lue i1i .� SII 7. Although the sewers in general are not seven feet deep; we have n ._o\Tp&.ouided for a minimum distance of at least. 1 foot between the top of the sewer pipes and the bottom of the house foundations. All foundations will be a miximum of 3 2 feet below grade. This will assure adequate pitch of sewer connection to main sewer line. 8. We realize that the Valley Street sewer is sloping at 0.30% and that this is a very small gradient, but, we can also site instances where sewer lines are laid at this grade and function satisfac- torily. 9. Storm drainage has been added to the preliminary profiles. Yours truly, OSEP D.. CARTER cc: DiBiase Brothers, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING COST CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-2172 RES. 99 PLEASANT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744.1195 February 59 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts RE: Application for Approval of Definitive Plan Submitted February 4, 1965 DiBiase Brothers, Inc. Gentlemen: In behalf of the petitioner, DiBiase Brothers, Inc. , it is requested of the Planning Board that the following requirements of the Sub-division Regulations be waived. 1. Section IV A (1) (h) - "Property lines at street inter- sections shall be rounded or cut back to provide for a curb radius of not less than thirty (30) feet." It is requested that this requirement be waived only with respect to the entrance at Ord Street for the reason that the adjoining property to Ord Street is not owned by the Petitioner, although efforts have been made to purchase this land in order to remedy this situation and conform to this requirement. 2. Section IV A (1) (f) - "The minimum centerline radii of curved streets shall be two hundred thirty (230) feet." It is requested that this requirement be waived only with respect to the street bounded by the property shown as Lots 709 719 72 and 73 which has less than the required centerline radii; however, it Is submitted by the Petitioner that this is a part of a street intersection and therefore does not fall within the requirement of this section. Nevertheless, the reason for this request is to locate the street within the valley and thus avoid the nearby ledge. 3. Section IV A (2) (a) - "The minimum width of street rights-of-way shall be fifty (50) feet." It is requested that this requirement be waived and that the Petitioner be allowed to construct street rights-of-way 1 Planning Board -2- February 5, 1965 of forty (40) feet. It is brought to the attention of this Board that an attempt has been made in keeping with good planning and design standards by the Petitioner to locate the streets in the hollows of the terrain in order to avoid as much as possible the ledge which is prominent throughout the property. A waiver of this requirement would greatly minimize the amount of ledge blasting which will have to be done. 4. Section V A (4) - "Granite curb and gutters shall be installed not closer than thirty-six (36) feet face-to-face. " It is requested that this requirement be waived and that the Petitioner be permitted to install Bituminous Curb not closer than thirty (30) feet face-to-face for reason of the prohibitively high cost of installing granite curbs. It is respectfully submitted that virtually every development in the Essex County area contains bituminous curbing with satisfactory results. It is hoped that the Planning Board will consider these requests for waivers and act favorably upon them. Very trul Y s, rg s, Attorney for �iBiase Brothers, Inc. GPV/ijp ' I • TIGrl3 J ,� rIO E) �\� � 0C r VINNIN SQUARE - LORING AVENUE • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS - - ------------ January 8, 1965 Mr. John Hooper Chairman, Planning Board Salem City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Hooper As the leader of the City Planning Board, we urge that you support the • stand taken by the Neighborhood Association of Vinnin Square, Salem, Massachusetts. Attached you will find a copy of a memo to the Ward 7 Councilor which explicitly spells out the feeling of the Neighborhood. Signatures to substantiate the vox populi are included. We are taking this means of alerting you to our problem and specifically ask that you keep us advised of any conditions or changes in your plan- ning that affects the Vinnin Square area. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely Robert Liani 504 Loring Avenue Salem, Massachusetts (Representing Neighborhood Association - Vinnir quare) BOREHOOD ASSOC VINNIN SQUARE - LORING AVENUE i SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS F LE C`0 P V Mr. Edmond J . Perron, Jr. January 8 , 1965 20 Grant Road Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Perron As this neighborhood's representative and City Councilor of Ward 7 , we urge that you personally take immediate action relative to conditions in the Loring Avenue ( Vinnin Square) area --_conditions spelled out below and personally discussed with you on several occasions in the past. So that there is no misunderstanding, the deplorable conditions that necessitate this action are being reduced to writing. Specifically we are referring to: - • A. Use of residential (zoned) building - a house - for Business and/or Commercial purposes on Loring Avenue. An eyeball survey indicates this structure is being employed as a warehouse for raw foodstuffs and concurrently as a dump for garbage, residue of corrugated cartons and trash. �r1 B. It is our conviction that, resulting from the foregoing, this year the neighborhood has been frequented with rats . These conditions must cease and the source must be eliminated. C. The "odors" emitting from this business, centralized food producing establishment permeate the entire neighborhood -- into rooms -- bedrooms, closets, and the obnoxious smells hang on clothes therein. This offensive condition has grown progressively worse. It is possible that the caldrons that brew this repulsive material are actually "in production" supplying locations in other cities (that would not tolerate such) . D. State Route 1-A has been made extremely hazardous from (1) automobiles parked on both sides of Loring Avenue and on the sharp curve of 1-A itself -- a location where three main roads meet; (2) cars entering and emitting from parking area; (3) delivery truck bodies hanging out over state 1-A roadway itself; (4) most important: the numerous children daily crossing state road -- in transit to and from schools, stores, etc. --- their safety must be considered . In brief, the traffic conditions • brought about by the foregoing has created at this junction bewilderment for the motorist and intense danger for any pedestrian. This outrageous condition should be acted upon by you. We are all interested in progress in this age of change, and technical innovations; how- ever, the situations tested above are obnoxious to the neighborhood -- to us willing to speak up--and we venture to say, to those who for valid reasons are silent also. Here you • have conditions that are infringements on the "common good" and well being of a fine neighborhood. Must the residents suffer because a business has outgrown its establishment? Must we be subjected to rodents in back yards in 1965 ? Will the "production" of food ingredients continue to emit odors,--daily ? Will it take a serious accident to keep route 1 - A clear of parked cars and on the curve ? You will find attached , one of several schematic,Exhibit re conditions in the Vinnin Sq. area. It is our understanding also, that for extended periods of time and on frequent occasions, the City has been called upon to use a large (Kollman type) sewer cleaning machine, to free clogged waste on Loring Ave. . . .please advise us the number of manhours expended and the reasons for same, . . .certainly a drain on taxpayers dollars. If we may refer to some basic, generally accepted business ethics and policies: Most businesses recognize that it is the average citizen,---his investment in land and home that make up'a Community,--any Business establishment, large or small, are intrinsically accountable to the immediate neighborhood in which it operates,--this is primarily a social responsibility. In brief, the State ( City, Town, Business, etc. ) exists for the people --not vice versa,---as former high executive for the American Tel & Tel has stated: " No one can accept responsibility ,--unless he takes it first on his own doorstep,--business and Industry must aim for, exist for, and everlastingly operate for the good of the Community." Most realistic Business men accept this creed. . One important point in all this: Let us not delude ourselves that any expansion of building will improve or rectify these conditions,--it will only add to the problem,--not solve it at all. A brief reflection to the principles of Parkinson's Law makes this apparent. Moreover, any expansion is intrinsically repugnant to all of us and completly untenable. In summary then: Kindly send us a memo on or before January 25, 1965 --advising us your Plan of action,--what you specifically plan to do relative to conditions "A" through "D" ° above. List also your target dates for the completion of same. We trust that your Plan will be specific and your action will be aggressive,--relentless,--and responsive,--so that it will not be necessary for us to pursue these problems beyond the local municipal level . We are considering making the City Officials a part of this memo,--however, we look to you as the representative of Ward 7 to be the Vox Populi. MORENCY DOLAN cc * Councilors - At - Large POITRAS BURKE o CITY OF SALEM OFFICIALS CkTHE NEIGHBORHOOD _ ASSOCIATION V i n n i n Square and Loring Ave area Names are Signed on the Attached Sheet - «f."•:x.Wit.. - ::N:. IN - ;•f•. r•� �Jei •r`I. W it r x i.• :•li f�rr:• •b•• S � • s. F' r • O f: • Cedar Crest O d - •t Ce :'r:�ti:S y = `�•NOT•••T•�• C LE LEGEND: •'.L--ill: :... Q ® Delivery Trucks hang over Rt. 1-A .'" E I m A v e W i Pedestrian n & hi C Idr en Hazardo R o esiden i t al i Warehouse h e ouse s Dump 0 : '-: Parked ed Cars0 ❑ i li b ndury c e. ElU G y v - - 0 School L••. . F— hil ur !N ••C dr en� ES E 'i�• e O O . I d a •e• v .. 4. • Ave • Maple A . . . . . . . . . . O .. KIN . :. PAR G . . . . ✓ • . . ARE . . . . . . . . 7 :•t i t• O Vinnin Q i :! 1 V �E t 4 x • 3 To y: I Sa em WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS REQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS . 7 P6 WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED PAGES, ITEMS ''A'' THROUGH "D" �o _ d — moo , 11-11 1100 r , oi e O cf/ d.e.cvlhr 40 11 10 k .00 l6 i� AV AP A u ® 1IEEIG H BO R HO OJ ASO SOC 0 WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT REQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS. WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED • . THROUGH "D" 71 /ice _ IRAN / i i VM&poirzo 0001, i71Ifly i . 1a.. . WE A/ VC I WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS • REQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS. WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED PAGES, ITEMS "A" THROUGH "D" . �f� 6� is �:{,i�.�i.a..... '^i'�`�R�G"�'A/� . �.�L'� • i ..L°... �, ,I~...�..-l-w^o,. ( l_f:� �M•�' LSF•++-c _ fir/ �✓'�� .v, 'rt. -4,ale . 2 a t •yam .,�._�_ —vim ✓ /A� 6 AT 4074 n Wit NBC) ►' WO r1r) A �i�'aov' ' WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS REQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS. WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED PAGES, ITEMS "A" THROUGH "D"obAJ e. ,. _ .a,,►�, �t / AV ,l,.d.srJ [Y ��&.Ct4��-� ° � �0 e•.1 r�- � ° .dam�1 • �IEIG Hiri0ilk rl0 0D A 'S 0 � • WE THE UNDERSIGNED ,-HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS_ =EQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS . WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED PAGES , ITEMS "A" THROUGH "D" : - 40.01 � - -- 1 LIAL . 10 40 40 op 40 14 11211111, C �dy .loyk�. q 6 f i rl B O ilk rl WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS • REQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS . WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED PAGES, ITEMS "A" THROUGH "D" 09 / P"otV `1,e •J �f 3 ,� � IV iv Yf I 1w do r 4 �. � - , l w Y 1 IIE1r H -prio ►w wrj r) ri n- r-) r a -WE THE UNDERSIGNED, HAVE READ AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS REQUEST MADE TO THE CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS . WE ALSO ATTEST TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE ATTACHED PAGES, ITEMS "A" THROUGH "D" : - 3 Tit Q a • .4"l-toOk /{a ! lTeo i.,17e ISi?6e $ICj]?Gd, "US C"n�s 01, Wa 6 ! '!.11 the 1:: of SS3.G`m who • i i ever. the vicinity! t.Y of b.he Ce°hina Sails i�'+.G'SCc?LL1:c1 d3 C.: pzot est- anv c'h'ange l'latsoevs: .in he zoning "?o4?:'!C'tcl_.ies is hv-;: any propext-y loz3'r`3.tea to t-he Norma c St sil de O" -he China Sails L'G'S":am u^.i'3 and cedaa: Avenue." ADDRESS _ ...rte-i�..p.. .�•..,r.,.,.q�.,..,Z�. _�.a...®.._�.., j-0 Oe 041 ea2 'r ---- �3 �9 _ • a . . • . ..� 4. • - - • ' _ ., t. ♦ " "i i s - undersigned, residentsof Ward 7 in the City of Salem wbo lieve in the vicinity of the China Sails Restaurant, protest any dbange whatsoever in the zoning boundaries that affects any property located tothe Northeasttthe China Sails restaurantY Cedar i" ADDRESS r S / A� _ . , / zz /f if - A / i / . / r1 � _l- W Leg IVY wlllcool s f i i i i I, 9 IV - We OF gm Iw �/ / u .r .fir---.._ -N.r •�r !� - _._-.:�. _. ._ __. ._ - J - ..a.-ice Il� �a _ _ ___ ../sem✓ i ' "Ws, -the undersigned, residents of Ward 7 in -the City of Salem w%o lieve in -the vicinity of the China. Sails Restaurant, protest any charge C-,Tha scaver in the zoning boundaries that afgaats any property located to 'alae Mol theast side of the China Sails restaurant said Cedar Avenue." EA,my- ADDRESSe 12 . 'We, tine undersigned, resi0encs of Ward 7 in the City of Salem who liese ir_ the vicinity of the China Sails PeslmuraiTe, protest any change whatsoever in the zoning:boundaries that affects any property loeated to the Northeast side of the China Sails restaurant and Cedar Avenue." M&ME- ADDRESS !•ice_ �. Ins - Jrj. _ • e WQYA4&� IL ` • ' TO TAE CITY OF-SALEM PLANNIO.:BUARD. :. We, .the undersigned, ,being residents of 'both single , and multi-family homes across the street from the,State` ' Teachers College on Loring Avenue, Linden, Charles, and Broadway.Streets, are greatly distressed' by and` opposed to the proposed zoning change affecting this area,` i.e. , n ,. from a two-family to a'single-family .status, w { Name" Address <." Date r I ®R �_J`!/_.:L1 - 1� ; { - ry 4 J7 11 �6 cG C 4 _ E �' > by -- 1 � 1 f X of Page 1 2 , 'rs u .•+..a„ - r <9k U v' r�'7rr- a _ l .i."i£ ..rte• r f X � • TT( 'THR CTTY .OF'SALN P ANKT G%BUAB I We, the underaignedj, being,,-4 aident r of bothtSingle " z and multi-family homes across `tho street from the atite Teachers College ori Loring Avenue, Linden, Chef=les; and r ( I >< Broadway Streetsj`;,are greatly distressed by eAd opposed a1 $, to the proposed .zoning change affecting this areas is ' from a two-fami-Ij to a 'single-family status'.' n v Ne:me a AQQS@9B } l# X ix�rC da V8SQ4 +P"d? 2a4��, ' l��bix li �"di� i _+i Ste`% P� V��ti✓C�7 ci TSS 4wt rr�•/f�"�L�'a��' Arb 2'.F E F'. t { 1A. � ��'��•_.c,�14'f�T r��i1�TiP Iil4�il}r���IVY����r�r ,Ti�N+ �"9 (Hi'�w`i►Y �1f Jj Y < k {. w N 45 kA t � , �wiwJ<�rW'i��i�)��#-1'�.w l �♦T�G�i.���� ��4 iwr�r� �i. 'r5�£� f t .> � Y91 y,. � i -��..�f.�..F �../CR� = t`_R�r rs i���'i^✓�1-e � }�[ d �',>t^ I f�tL' M it * r F R #.�( rw Lds-moiJ/ wgFKw6r"d-T w dr/wrrr. P � � �`�('}fF^` y \EXT C_lA l J�li'MP/ jTTTP }riTiYliIV rT� 'T k +`1iitY4r PN `4'YS F ° Y /. }/T y�Iw. IJ�// wr (j�'(//.T/G wwax �/�T �wT! //��^ y frw 4 r �w P/law FSY�di.�3 " ,` q yl.!Y`L.Y%L(wrL.G-c' lrfU lir •�� �� !- ''�// L.'(..�'\ ' �'� M4 �y 3 F � Y A ':' . . +., Y aY ,:. t•�an _F`l 1r3r }� � 3. �, i r rwwPTT Mwi1�P PT wT}!T w. PT Y r '� JPrt T 1 r V 1l t �f a� A . ry4>• `ftp r- + T MTT.T T �T TT - Z4TP'-T r} S t ' 1 Wr -r-w-r.� - •r Tw-rw r --TP -T�4 yglwTT°Y!w- r4 'w��, �y ptk�i t Page 2sof 2 3 ,x a '�t 'a ✓pr a t '.' t �' 3�v.$�,e�-� 'y �..F w}J'ry ' * C , ".'f February 4, 1965 001 PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board Office, February 4th, 1965. The Meeting was started at 8.30 P. M. Present : Raymond Sweeney, Philip Litman,iand Chairman Hooper On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To dispense with the reading of the Minutes of the January 21st Meeting. Form A Application of Larence J. Moyni4an, 3 Verdon Street for property of 5 Verdon Street was presented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision under the meaning p€ the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: Not endorse as the Form did not contain sufficient information and linen was not presented. •— Form C Application for Approval of Definitive Plan of DiBiase Brother, Inc . 25 Acorn Street, Malden for land located at rear of Ord Street and Valley Street, was presented and On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To hold a Public Hearing at the Council Chambers on March 4th, 1965. Plans are to be submitted to the City Engineer for his comments. Letter from Daniel J. O'Brien, Jr. , Inspector of Buildings was read and placed on file. On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: Covenant covering partial release on Lots 6 and 9 on Dundee Road for Angelo Trovas was signed and notarized. There being no other business to come before the Meeting it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: To adjourn at 9. 15 P. M. Cle 'February. 5, '196,5- gr. Neal Mitchell r s+ City Nngineer_ City Ball +, Salem; btasa: . f> Dear Sir: Will you please go over the glans of the DiBiase Bros. Subdivision and return your recommendations by larch 4tb,1965? - ' 1. On that date a•Public Bearing is to be held in the Council Chambers -at ' 7.30 P.11. . Very `truly yours, y- PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SAUK.,. -JOHN B. HOOP=; CHAIRMAN' 4 • .s _ RESIDENCE 744-SOSO OFFICE 744-2811 0 SUMNER LOW RAYMOND ATTORNEY AT LAW MASONIC TEMPLE 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS February 16, 1965 John B. Hooper, Chairman Salem Planning Board City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Hooper: RE: Proposed revision of the zoning ordinance of the City of Salem I am writing this letter to your Board in my capacity as Chairman of the Salem Historic District Study Committee. I regret that a previous engagement prevents my appearing personally before you in representation of the Committee. The Salem Historic District Study Committee notes that the pro- posed revision omits all reference to "Section 3, Historical Districts - A", which was incorporated as a part of the present zoning by-law with the intent and purpose of preserving, maintaining and promoting the historic character of historical districts in this city. The present zoning map includes as historic districts Chestnut Street, Pickering Street, part of Flint Street, Derby Wharf and the Salem Custom House area. The provisions with respect to historical districts in the present zoning by-law were legally enacted in 1955 and their validity has never been challenged. In the opinion of the Salem Historic District Study Committee, the omission of these provisions from the proposed zoning by-law is regressive, and in derogation of the forward-looking attitude of the state legislature and of all thoughtful private citizens and public officials of the City of Salem, whose policy it is to protect and improve the historical shrines of our city and state, rather than to remove safeguards that have been erected for their preservation. The Salem Historic District Study Committee opposes any new zoning by-law which does not include the provisions of the present zoning by-law with respect to historical districts. Re pe tfully yours, Sale Historic Dis St dy Commit e By - umner aymon airman r ' Telephone 599-1700 Sales, Management, Appraisals Jpicended and Mortgages JAMES ALBERT Commercial and /9e3idenllal MADELINE C. ALBERT CouaseC// ALFRED A. ALBERT 5A UNION STREET » LYNN, MASS. JAMES ALBERT Feb. 17th, 1965 Planning Hoard City of Salem Salem, Mass. Gentlemen: In accordance with your kindness shown to us at last night's hearing we are please to attach herewith a memorandum which we have drawn cdntaining our thoughts and suggestions. Also attached are the plot plans showing the area to which we have specific reference. #1. shows two lots. Lot 1. is the land of Vincent Potato Chip and next two it is Lot 2. which is now under agreement for the purpose of erecting a retail outlet. #2. is the remaining land showing any frontage oll Highland Ave, a portion of this is under the same agreement. #3. shows the land on the easterly part of the land on Swampscott Rd. #3 is drawn to a larger scale than the others but if you match up on Swampscott Rd, the picture becomes cleared. It would appear from the suggested changes that a portion of the land shown on #3 would be rezoned R-C. Such zoning would make that portion so zoned valueless and therefore we suggest it should carry the same zoning as the balance of the land. If we can be of any further service please advise. Very truly yours, ROYAL ALBERT REALTY INC. MEMCRANDUM Submitted on behalf of:' Royal Albert Realty Inc., Lynn, Mass. This Corporation has made a substantial deposit on an agreement to purchase 162 acres of land fronting on the Easterly side of Highland Avenue in Ward 3, Precinct 3 and more fully described as follows: Approximately 1050 feet on Highland Avenue between land of Vincent Potato Chip and Charland and running along the rear of Charland to Swampscott Road and along Swampscott Road for 3000 feet and then land runs to City of Salem land at the Golf Course area. The proposed zoning change calls for this area to be reclassified as I District (Industrial) with special permit uses for B 21 B 3 and B 14 but specifically prohibiting special permit uses for R-C, R 11 R 20 R 3 and B 1.(See Section V sub. A 8 and B 9(a) of Proposed New Zoning Law). All types of residence including multiple dwelling are strictly forbidden as well as any neighborhood business as specified under B 1. The present zoning for the same area shows the Highland Avenue area to a depth of 600 feet to be zoned commercial; the Swampscott Road area to a depth of 1400 feet to be zoned Industrial and the remainder residential. We submit that the proposed zoning changes are not for the best interest of the land involved nor for the best interest of the City. There is no question in our minds that the area previously zoned residential should be changed. The real issues come down to two fundamental questions ; 1st. For what purpose is the land best suited within the foreseeable future? 2nd. What purpose will best serve the City? It is not enough merely to designate areas under certain zone restrictions without taking into consideration the nature and topography of the land involved. The 162 acre tract described herein is approximately 95% ledge and most of it is above the levels of Highland Avenue and Swampscott Road. In addition, the City Engineering Department informs us that there is a serious water supply problem and a sewerage problem. (City Engineer's Letter dated December 114, 1964). - 2 - To attempt to build single residence houses in this area would be too costly; • blasting problems for water and sewerage would make such a project financially unfeasible; nor could septic tanks be used because of the extensive ledge. Therefore. the present zoning of the area designated 'residential', is unwise. However, this does not make unwise the location of multiple dwelling units. Cur firm has concluded an extensive survey of this area. We have also explored the probabilities of locating industry in this area, our experts inform us that from the standpoint of obtaining industrial development, our chances are about nil, The only way this could be done, if at all, is for the establishment of a community commission with a large appropriation at its disposal, Tie Job of this commission would be to concentrate solely on bringing industry in. In view of the City's present budgeting problems, this seems unwise, There are far better areas to develop for this purpose. In addition, we are informed that the location of the area can serve other purposes far better and would result in earlier tax revenues to the City. We would not oppose zoning the entire area Industrial if the zoning law would permit, (instead of prohibit) zoning classification (R 3 and B 1) multiple residence and neighborhood business uses. Based upon information at our disposal, we have engaged in the promotion of the area for a three-fold purpose : 1, The land along Highland Averme to a depth of about 1300 feet is ideally suited for business development such as is set forth in B 2. We have already entered into an agreement for the development of 9 acres of this land as a shopping area. At the moment, a large single building will be erected to house a nationally known retail hard goods outlet, We are currently engaged in negotiation for the balance of the front land. .Among those with whom we are dealing, is a large New York Department store which has no branch in massachusetts, Changes as suggested would adversly affect the outcome of these negotiations. # 2. Tied in with the commercial development are our present negotiations for the erection of 400, two story multiple dwelling units on the rear portion of the acreage. This will call for the construction of an access road from Highland Avenue, Naturally, those who have manifested an interest in the commercial - 3 — development of the area are highly sensitive about the development of the rear portion. Car own surveys have convinced us that the erection of low • cost multiple dwelling units on the rear portions are highly feasible. We would not encounter problems of separate take off water lines and separate sewerage problem for each unit as would be required for single residences. Multiple units could better absorb this cost. If there is a prohibition against multiple housing units and neighborhood business which may be required, we cannot foresee any full scale development of the land for some time to come. At this point, we might also call attention to the fact that the proposed zoning of the land on the Westerly side of Highland Avenue directly opposite the parcel in question calls for a B 2 classification and why this should be different from the Easterly side of Highland Avenue is very difficult to comprehend. 3. There is a strong tendency in modern housing toward the development of row housing or town housing both with and without adjacent multiple dwelling • units. Such units are currently being built in many sections of the state and country. There is no provision whatever in the proposed zoning laws which cover this usuage of land. At a very heavy expense, the Lynn Area Chamber of Commerce employed W. H. Ballard Company of Boston to make a detailed study of the Lynn community Renewal Program and the Iynn market. The Company suggests more dense land uses in order to bring people back to smaller, more carefree, convenient and accessible city use, such as cluster zohing or something akin to town houses. Therefore, they recommend much smaller lot area per dwelling unit with wider street. As a practical matter, town housing or row housing can be purchased at a much lower price than the .present concept of single homes. Many who now cannot afford their own homes, could afford a row or town house. Therefore, provisions for this type of housing should be incorporated. Changes with regard to lot size, width, etc. would have to be made, so that it will be possible to convey individual lots to owners, Iyynn, Boston and other communities have adopted such provisions. - 4 - Y I1n the same vein, the new concept of condominiums should be considered. To • restrict this entire area to District I and then place prohibitions on certain usages will have a deleterious effect rather than an ameliorating effect. If developers cannot promote the usuage in accordance with the best available plans and somewhat immediate plans, then it will be yeard before the City will see any real benefit from the area. As far as we know, no one has made aTV serious attempt to develop this area for at least fifteen years, In making the agreements, we have,and in entering upon our present negotiations we have; the reasonably close outlook calls for about x¢5,000,000 worth of construction, all of which may be lost if the proposed changes are affected in the manner now suggested. Accordingly, we make the following proposals for the 162 acre plot herein described; 1. Frontage on Highland Avenue to a depth of 1300 feet be zoned B 4 with special permit uses for R 32 B 10 B 2 and B 3 and including new provisions to be made for town or row houses and condiminiums. 2, Frontage on Swampscott Road to a depth of 400 feet zoned I with special permit uses for R 3, B 1, B 2, B 3 and B 4'including new provisions to be made for town or row houses and condiminiums* 3. Balance of area ,to be zoned B 3 with special permit ushs for R 39 -B 1, B 2 and new provisions to be made for town or row houses and condiminiums. 4, That all areas to be zoned as R 3 should include provisions for town or row housing and condiminiums, In conclusion, we wish to call attention to the fact that under Section p A 2 R 2 (g) and A 6 B 3 (L) although all residential purposes are prohibited, exemption is made for the Salem Housing Authority thereby arbitrarily restricting the right of private enterprise to build low cost housing even with Federal Aid. The provisions should be amended to include our suggested R 3 special permit uses including town houses and condiminiumss a. y ,e,7. � SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM 2124 6 f l Edwin T. Brudzynelti, Surveyor *oUA ReNtatIt May 14, 1951 RECEIVED AND FILED With Certificate No�� HIGHLAND AVENUE _•' 1.P.in ledge d.h N.53 03'464,E. i •lR in ledge as M.H.S. NS/° Z/ 06 E 60832 as NNe• In AM.e = ch- ki uss 309.09 a M. f 6688 '.qrc=67 Nri•�iosa IP 3//ZO1 ° - r6z°oy.UEa ; e _ .00' a \ s d.h opp { \ - - ,W Q .69 h _ IS ehv? W. LIf . O •� h z ahs W ° . .. a N mN Lq ow zW . Q r� 43 43 i - cj N• •r1 U ' W Hf . _. .^ 0 N q Yoi A r10 CQ 4J Q W r. O U 4' W A m � f 0 P4 +1 j a 0.50 dh. 3//89 QA.4 cqW rdx; ver d Wil s' so•os' 7 sco 3Og//,,,,M. T r : N- y °��4 p} k . . 57•l// 368.Sy Y h....._..,. . s'�'033)jy N v q (A Co sono/d S- iz.63t ^ da, .... vh Of J.5B'/s'/2'w 40'K, dA. -.t. Separate cerrificates of till may a issue Copy of ppaart of plan filed :n for .L.o.k.a.__L, ." es o he (AND REGISTRATION OffICE By the Court JUNE 8./95/ — Scale of the plan /00 feet to an inch -....-,._....... _ WTfeirc%ugh, Engineer for Cou t Recorder • - L� o ni trii�r<av Nt�c! f. tworttro.v lr�... . ., - ^ <r 6MLNN0 /y�.E. ' THIS PLN HAS BEEN REDUCED. FOR CORRECT SCALING SEE ORIGINAL ON Pfrz _ i Lar � �' t • t t , 2 ` ' •. ... ore -. //B./7 r9GRt1 • w , F c a e •• '- �J AI MFc/C!/Caw./!<1W lr ke _ •. .: 'TEO PIAN HAS BEEN REDUCED. FOR CORRECT + f •S. 1Go SCALI119 SEE DAIDIHAL ON rl'IE L q"o o/CJTN7Li of /7L/c&f. imm&,e TON lT wal.. ' Jewa� /w,•pp lr f f ✓wNUA,fY,/kL T � t1N�p4fTI1Y OF OttDf.]O.pSl.LIfP,M.O ( s. 1.. �..aSyJ7r Lle pnu.rr., ° glrOsL Lf . AMAW • ,I a + i , \ j ri f , , 1 h y 1 _ Aw St foGJJ - sH,�rGvs�o'rr � ' +[yNV Plw.w jif $atem, Aassar4usdts w • v �w'.• d UOffSLE of t4E (9StU V.¢rk wttIMIN[.�� 9m 19 �IS$1lStLttE J-�QQ4ttEp� _ CHH(91e k February 12, 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. 40 Dear Sirs: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, February 11, 1965 your request for use of the Couneil Chamber on Thursday, March 4th at 7:30 P.M. was granted. 9ery t/r��i r yours9_ CITY CLMM February 18, 1965 PLANNING BOARD - CITY OF SALEM Regular Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board Office, Thursday, February 18th, 1965 at 7 .30 P. M. Present: John M. Gray, Jr. , Philip Litman, Raymond Sweeney and Miahael Paskowski Mr. John Serafini, Attorney, appeared before the Board in behalf of China Sails stating that his client would attempt to correct some of the problems which the neighbors feel theee are in the operation of China Sails . Minutes of the hearing on Zoning at Salem State College on February 16th were read and approved. ' Mr. David Burns, Attorney, representing Saverio Ciraae, spoke regarding the granting of a variance for the purpose of making alterations to a third floor property at 22 Irving Street for use as an apartment. The petition had previously been denied by the Board of Appeals. He had 21 signatures of neighbors favoring variance. The matter was taken under advisement. • Letter from the City Council dated February 12th approving use of the Council Chamber for Thursday, March 4th read and placed on file. Discussion was held regarding Rezoning. Mr. Hyman Marcus presented a request to change zoning behind the Stop & Shop. Motion made and seconded to leave the zoning as shown on the proposed Map and it was SO VOTED. Councillor O' Keefe requested an area at the end of Northey Street to be changed from Industrial to R2 and on motion made and seconded to change the area from Northey, Woodbury Court between Woodbury Court and North River from Industrial to R2 and it was SO VOTED. Motion made and seconded that the B2 area on the northerly side of Bridge Street at Thorndike Street be extended to Rice Street at a depth of 60 feet and it was SO VOTED. Motion made and seconded to leave present business zone at the north east corner of Cedar and Loring Avenue remain as shown on the 1955 Zoning Map. Motion denied. Motion made and seconded to change the R2 at Boston Street, east from Highland Avenue to Proctor Street to B1 for a depth of 250 feet and it was SO VOTED. Motion made and seconded to change the Rl area on Loring Avenue from Charles Street to R2 and it was SO VOTED. FEBRUARY 18, 1965 •- PLANNING BOARD - Page 2 On motion duly made and seconded the request to change the zoning on Boston Street at or near Aborn Street was denied. On motion duly made and seconded that there be no change on the Industrial Line set back on Sunset Road and it was SO VOTED. There being no further business to come before the Meeting it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: To adjourn. SIGNED: . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 25, 1965 PLANNING BOARD - CITY OF SALEM Special Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board Office, February 25th, 1965 at 7 .30 P. M. Present : John B. Hooper, John M. Gray, Jr. Philip Litman and Raymond Sweeney. Minutes of February 4th Meeting read and approved. Form A Application of Donaldson and Driscoll, 6 Lynde Street, Salem, Mass. , was presented that property at 15 and 17 Essex Street does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the SuHdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To endorse. Mr . Hyman Marcus, Attorney, agrued again for the change of zoning on the line of Tedesco Road. On motion duly made and seconded to reconsider the zoning at Tedesco Road and it was SO VOTED. • Motion duly made and seconded concerning the rezoning of Tedesco Road change to stand as it appears on the Map and it was SO VOTED. Motion made and seconded that the R1 district bounded by Boston, Beaver, Grove and Silver Streets to be changed to R2 and it was SO VOTED. Motion made and seconded that the lot area on the Islands of Salem be added to the exemptions from the Zoning Laws as listed on3 the last paragraph of Section 6, paragraph A6, and it was 6o VOTED. A discussion of the Historic District was held and it was decided a letter should be written to the Historic Study Commission to take action on the Historic Districts at the same time the new Zoning Map was acted upon. - The matter of Puleo' s Dairy was discussed and it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: No change be made. Discussion held on Bridge Street B1 zoning and on motion duly • made and seconded it was VOTED: To leave Zoning as is. February 25, 1965 PLANNING BOARD - Page 2 Motion duly made and seconded to submit New Zoning By-Laws and Plan to the City Council and it was SO VOTED with three in favor and one opposed. There being no further business to come before the Meeting it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: To adjourn. SIGNED: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • FORM A- RECI_!`4'�S FEB 24 �� 59 APPLICATION R ENDORSEMENT /�OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT 0 REQUIRE APPROVAL CITY CI.ERf"S OFFICE SALEM MASS• File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., . February 24s . ., 19.65 To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant . WilliaM .H...K.. D.P. naldson. and.jfti. A.. Driscoll Address . . . . . 6 .Lyrtde ,St. Salem Dass. . . . . . _ . . . 2. Name of Engineer or .Surveyor . . EdW3Y7d, Brudzynski Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . LafayetVei... St. Salem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Deed of property recorded in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ESsex South . . . . Registry, Book . .2£362. . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . .434. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Location and Description of Property: 15 and 1; essex St. see plan dor description Lots haae Frontage on a Public Way. Signature of own . . . Address . . . .� 2 L 4 t •f R?� h w a • r ' 4° it... .. 'M1• � - � ` � � d S ,.5..� . L r- � d �h i .). F a t 'Pr- 5'" ` � M a . . bt'J t�1' #.Y 3 v r � � w ��1 d'4 I '• t b_ L�.k � i y' •: Y' `Yn ,rft i M1�a fir„ P A±B M Y' a t w. y_Yd f e4 t 'A �' .& t • LM F y' 1 w .st: . 1. r H i i .Yr - •R w9 a p' ✓`" � o�•' pf r, ' l hi ',p�:, d "� ..Ia s. ,f♦ v�r'r _ ' � 4xay P" ° -qy y ' � F • , c sX •a4 4 02 QD fw d ,.t' � � 7 • 4 a � s •3 F 1 y4.� aµ � � w . � y �rO 4 4 '� .„ a c -J3,Wto' „0 to 'tot �• -t 4 l .: t t r�yi }. S ; 9f. 'Yrt ra �N 4 i �I •L Ml V/ N, `. '�' -. 4 utx• Ya4:' ! i 4, ryi'f a 'Y; ' `1/ (rl _ � � tV9 A' 'n,� ,j '/ •iv/jt x f •i N' ^1 ri '.O Q i fir 400 SMI "may 93 P4 93 � • � VU Ya d ¢; � ti Ml.f ..'«4 ;i.(fl � � rY .." •. �'r ° � .ya (. 'S• w�� a {• ' a � °x 1¢ p' } •♦ J'Y f '. • { �. '1 A f° �� a. y •S �Y f a. CQ C+ _ 'r4 � � tr• a v... F"! r Y 'a � ,' T • f V cs (Q • '_.. •a; w Fw t y �Y. M1 .. 00 .•Y, ' °• a Sof • I'+i'i CV r• ' � ° <.: ..t?it; ^� A x a..,� �" gyp_ 1 Y y a k.xv a t ��,• R •' tr y f c'R R � vt-y. •4 htV •...r {W •# a� k .. t • �. •'hi '.a. ' M1Ikv a.` n a y ..,$� '' •W re ;- ��L 5 T 1.y,u. •'f.ap t., i ^, t +� - •...'* �`d h .'t.rt r.V ..1. .,ry _ Ali - +t�' ; } ° � Y•A V t j-;i . 0Y City of Salem s e PLANNING DEPARTMENT s One Salem Green �+� Salem, Massachusetts 01970 4 ' � fir' • • ♦ -. � • • • � p �' • . . i ' ." a. a •. 1 . h March 8, 1968 To the ,Honorable City Council`, ' City Hall Salem$ Mass. v GentlemeA. The Planning Board of the City of Salem. after two years of work and consultation with Blair Associates, - and the property owners of Salem and after a Public Hearing in accordance with the General taws wishes to present for approval anew Zoning•Map for the City of Salem. The Map will put into*action all the recommendations 'n which were adopted by your Honorable Body in the City of Salem Master Plan. . Enclosed are copies of the Zoning Ordinance andr the Zoning Plan of the City. At a• Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of. Salem held on February 35th, 1985 it was voted , to recommend that the City of Salem adopt the; Zoning Regulations, Very truly• yours, PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM '` JOHN B,-HOOPER, CHAIRMAN , .' v ,' u Y .^•. f'• y } , � 4. i.+.. f f t. a. 'tet' l .V 4 0 F, y., ns -rSY.. ia. t \ � j 1 ri •i Y c� March 2" 1968 ;y W. Sumner L. Raymond.:Chairman - a Hi'storic,- District Study,;,Commit tee : Salem, Massachusetts g F. Dear"Mr. YRagmondc,, # tie, 'Zoning Ordinance City,pf Salem '+ * ', Ata lieeting. of thc%= planning='Board it was'.voted' that a "{ letter be ;%vritteri''to_ theSalem Historic District Study , j Committee to-clarify the''matter conceraing,.`$istoricq C District in the'propOsed,Rezoding- Ordinance. F The reason that there is, n'o.-Historic Zoning shown on ;the-7f , . Zoning Map. 1s that the legiAlation under :which• the presents. Historic''. Zoning'_is .wr tten is :considered. 'illegal and • y yr3. unenforceable, by the present day;standaids:. This was noted in _the Historic District Study Repo'rt;:prepared x ' z by Hlair Associate's.' d.. In' `that Aeport the planning Board recommended that. the s ;Salem Historic District Study Committee be formed and ` that;'they 'prepare to,present to the Salem City~Council - X ` N proper,.legislatioa as =outlined in the Historic Study'-° f a . r Report.? -~-The situation- is that the Salem Historic District Study, x` Committee should ,now'recommend. that the City' Councsil [ 'adopt. proper permiHsive legislation `:forming, the Salem ; sY ' Historic District -Commission`'prior to or-.coincidental . ' with'"the adoption •of,.theme* .Zoning. Map. This Commission-would then enact the.proper' Historic .Zoning Regulations, that should be adopted by. the•City° 3 ' It ,has been recommendeda;that this; form of historic t controlyis. proBer. r, �. S "• g R - -t �. a ` The ,plsnningyBoard 'recommends -that Salem;Historlc `District { 'Study Committeeltake action on this;'project. _: • ' r . R r 'Very truly yours, t -. PLANNING BOARD, CITY 011 SAIM11 C . � w JO�1 B. :HOQ�>wR,"CHAIRMAN F. _ CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD The Planning ,Board will hold a Public Hearing at the ,Couacil Chambers, , City Hall, Thursday, March 4th, 1965 at .7.30 o'clock P. • M. on, the petition. of DiBiase Brothers, Inc. , . and the Salem Planning Board for, Subdivision of land rear of Valley and Ord Streets. Plans of the area are available at the Planning Board Office, 34 Church Street, Salem. SALEM PLANNING BOARD JOHN B. HOOFER, CHAIRMAN Insert February 17th and 24th Charge to Mr. George P. Vallis, Attorney 70 Washington Street Salem, Mass. Legal Norices7 '/„J6 CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD The Planning Board will hold a Public Hearing at the Coun- cil Chambers, City Hall, Thurs- day, March 4th, 1965 at 7.30 o'clock P.M. on the petition of DiBiase Brothers, Inc., and the Salem Planning Board for Sub- division of land at rear of Val- ley and Ord Streets. Plans of the area are available at the Planning Board Office, 34 Church: Street, Salem. Salem Planning Board JOHN B. HOOPER, Chairman. Feb. 17, 24, 1965. L_w - ---J , Frances X. Cullen Charles Murphy Hooksett, New Hampshire 61 Ord Street Salem, Mass. Josephine E. O'Donnell Harmelle C. Caisse 2 Broad Street 59 Ord Street Salem, Massachusetts Salem, Mass. Catherine M. eRaymond Parlee Buckley 13 Beckford Street t 57 Ord StreetSalem, Mass. Beverly, Massachusetts Richard T. Fanning John E. Jermyn 55 Ord StreetSalem, Mass. 146 Marlborough Road Salem, Massachusetts Benjamin B. Cleaves City of Salem o4c�V se Carmello Velardi 53 Endicott Street Salem, Massachusetts Basil Smyrnios 98 Main Street Peabody, Massachusetts Edward A. Coffey 70 Washington Street Salem, Mass. Country Shore Corp. Main Street Peabody, Mass. Joseph L. Jorge 67 Ord Street Salem, Mass. George King 65 Ord Street Salem, Mass, W. R. Chapruet 63 Ord Street Salem, Mass. ° u r--A ` Aei R,C.i e lee 4C 0Y. -- ----- ,�-Lei ----- ------- --- ------- - ----- -- �t/l/C lye G 2 t -- 15 ---- - ----------G�fes( •Z�N-C-----r r 1+�r_r�0-----�'aS__h,�-C,- ------ ------ ------- - --- .K to r / fl-04 d-- -�- -_ GEo U�LLL� r f QTr, ----- ----._SE.die_-Q�P�2ur<�..L--tuR___2iFu��_�I-✓_.�PLAq�, _----- ` G v uCi L_(._07l--1J lir_L,c-�--=-�`-'�'---Q'�f-QR---��'-/vl_✓-"�- ---- ---- — - -C-----gyp Qs -----c -�t.��4- -- ---- 2E—GrLT_-�.�- 4R-rf-li –`✓_ a a�+ 2lZ R+�� o /C�ty�—o?Q G.�r�r .e=_�✓amu_nr–F��e Ei-�6-tr6— 42 — ^rC_fzA, x s ' ' i � i i �i i i L� i - — -Sro r E C— —— ----- _ - -- - -- -c i r y--4i-s tr c --��n F= -�✓-4 `+�,-------------- —/)s y_rV t__-dvs_—s'*e�� - - - -------------�9 fL �ty i' . — ams r•c, d, r_v�,__���/j-y---- _Srarcg /moi e�iecL e✓< f3� --- -- �GrhL-0;V4- —4r,Cc— a aFG. er uA MG �i� EGO r<. = Sae eGro_2 Srn�eO ' —TK (/.44 _ W 1r !✓o r __ Ly Go y��[C-r of Cts= 2G frAre t) /✓�5-- -- --Fn.,-�-o . -- /_✓_�� 44C c r/i �2.a.a /72� �[sf vvn « <J�f leeuuanreoy L --` —Hoo G�— Lf_j-a�-Es 1ZEGCcar��_r�Eu/��c�iod--ra Ug4 G — — e.CIcAl eGy - tF Ed s v /� rer. Am C.'r ,l. ��Cc.c,1,a�t,�'!/nct�y rLn /do4.�—ILu �Cs �J�r'GR - - _�(A -- E �4,e«. n ,t/ G5J /JP24�u� c �_f fir_ tyt- -.-- ---��-��,, - -----G/_Jo' a rE-,�rL:!_T_i_e_.iv-•=--t f EG�-fE-4�c���✓-r-.-- IYoC �cacxY -d,t �Rr,E.r c� ira_a��aCiveErZ ---- - �ou4 �12Rr G_q�v �S- ��S4u_cr_- �mGS' _$°ud-7ru � fi�w ,r --- -- M q Ke X41/__ /CSC-G•11—S'�rA A r�e a E L�Gn`�— ,c-o -- r _ -_ __ -� _ _. _- _________--- _ ___r ,__ -_.-_ i r r .. , G /� � 1. ♦ � . 1 i �� i e _ _*� (9itV of Salem, fflttssar4use##s 3 �Oepxrfnceu# of ?Public Pnrks �cumas NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER February 24,1965- Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re: DiBiase Bros. , Inc. Subdivision. Gentlemen: Witchcraft Heights At your request we have reviewed the above referenced subdivision and recommend the following changes and additions be made to the plans: 1. That many of the sanitary sewers be extended to perm&t house connections to be made to a wye in the sewer line. There must be no house connections made directly to a manhole; 2. That a plan and profile of a sanitary sewer for Middle Street be added; • 3. That all sanitary sewers be laid deeper. The standard depth is seven feet. The depth shown, in many cases, Is insufficient to prevent breakage due to street traffic loads; 4. That excessively flat sewers (both sanitary and storm) be changed to a grade that will assure a self-cleaning opera- tion; 5. That storm sewers be laid deeper to obtain sufficient protection from breakage due to street traffic loads; 6. That it be indicated on the plans how it is intended to support sanitary sewers, storm sewers, manholes, and water mains in newly filled areas; 7. That catch basins be shown at all low points in streets; 8. That the proposed depth e�g water malms be indieated an the Plans;- 9. That the center-line radii of the streets be increased at least to the minimum prescribed in the rules; 10. That the street grades be increased to at least meet the minimum grade prescribed in the rules; 11. That the Fire Chief approve the hydrant locations and the City Solicitor rule on the legality of discharging storm water into a Swale. Very trul yours, `-72-�c//ll�%h" u� City Eng'r. .. t J CITY OF SALEM ,q In City Council,,,.,, a �a1 �'MHrce 90 , Ordered: 67 'r� a� _ _"/�-/ /' �~jiJ•- ..E� j .. ���r:G.'r�-y1jL—,.-'-�j .�, f.`iJ /� // � .�i+-.' .i /-?�J �dylC•/'%' o ��' -�7-J"LG'.y�9Ga ?'l !lam 'Y T� `��.G� �[�/--2 f.✓a � r i, � _. M �/y r Y - . Tn. .i'ty APPROVEC BY THE MAYOR on March 1¢1Qf ATTEST: A STINE J. i , Ojity of "Salent, 49ttsondjusetts q ptparfineut of Public Portes NEAL B. MITCHELL - ' Cliv [NOINEKI! - February 20,1965. To the City Council City Hall Salem, Ma 83, Bet Abbott Street :Sewer Report. Gentlemen: There is 1.29 mil.es..of ,,s,ewers tributary, -Abbett. ;5treet sewer. The proposed new development would add about 1.09 miles,- making a total of 2.38 miles of sewer contributing to the Abbott Street sewer .flow. Also, there is 0.18 miles Of 'sewer in ,Abbott Street making the total length of sewerage under discussion 2.56 .miles. Ase,umLng that there is a house connected to the sewer on every building lot along this .2.56 miles,- then it is estimated that the following capacities of the sewer will be utilized: Location Size Design capacity utilized South & Summit Sts. 8° 18% Between Summit & Ord Sts . 8" 35% At Ord Street 8" 98% Head of Abbott 3t. lW1 83% Foot of Abbott St. 1211 51% The design capaQNty js that of a sewer flowing half full. The flow is .. `cn i y�_ 't,j th tic total exclusion Of all . surface '• - uttDCLL vii .LLu.uc o-�i-v � - rater. Only at Ord Street - does the system closely approach the design capacity.' For this reason the system is considered adequate for existing and currently-proposed extensions,- in-so-far as sizes and grades are concerned. The system is, however, inadequate at the present time because of certain catch basin connections in Abbott Street. The Sewer Division has been notified of this condition and plans corrective action. Also a section of the sewer running through the open field is so shallow that freezing and breakage occurs during severe cold weather. Repair is not difficult. and can be madeby the ®ewer. Division. There are no inverts constructed in 'the manholes. If th® Sewer Division wo,yld ooupttaot these it would improve the flow and reflnos the„ mairttensnos aorsiderbly. In City Council Feb. 259 1965 Very truly yours, Rectd & filed- co'''p'''y toPl""""""asmin & C. Dolan;!2 opxea ter Neal B. Mitchell ATTEST•/ ' City Engineer 4 V ne March 4, 1965 • PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM A Public Hearing on DiBiase, Inc. Subdivision at Valley and Ord Streets was held on March 4th, 1965 at City Council Chambers, City hall, Salem, Massachusetts. PRESENT: Messrs Hooper, Paskowski, Sweeney, Gray and Litman who arrived at 9 o'clock. Hearing started at 7.45 P. M. Chairman Hooper read the notice of the Meeting and stated procedure and rules. Mr . Vallis representing DiBiase Brothers, Inc . of Malden, spoke in favor 61ccthe subdivision. Councilor Butler stated that most of the people present were neither in opposition or in favor but were there to speak regarding certain problems in the Subdivision. Minutes were taken of the Hearing by John M. Gray, Jr. Clerk of the Planning Board and are included in these Minutes as originally prepared. Also part of these Minutes is a letter from the City Engineer to the Planning Board regarding Subdivision. Also made part of the Minutes is a letter from the City Engineer to the City Council dated February 20th, 1965. On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: That decision be taken under advisement and discussed at the next regular Planning Board Meeting. Hearing closed at 9.20 o'clock P. M. SIGNED: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j a iK F.p- •T • h ^�. a .. . - t �r FY t - ' w y i a.. � I` �. w�• - � Pa^t r �. r,) 4' Aw. , n * Y r e 5; 1 March 965 5 1 t Lir:- Neal Mitchell , City -Engineer - City, Hal1 a: , Salem, Mass. +� Dear Sir: h • ,, s 1 , r . Could you Dlease .3be. present at the ', next Planning Board Meetingon March 18th, .1965 at.7Y34. P M. to, discues ` Witchcraft-Heights •Development? Please Yet 'AS known if �you cannot make it ' } Sincerely, , PLANNING BOARD; CITY OF 3ALEH r, b JOHN B.' HOOBER, CHAIRMAN 55 e'l4' `� - _ �_4d4 •.� ` .T a + Y. { YY t T _ 17 Y S , 4 p-' ro • p. s }' Y. 6e un,a •'i°. { 5•of - _ { �• x � � Marab 8�, 198!9 - } - - _. F N. � .., j •!'. .Y-v ' � , is in � i 3' a. � w'6.,. .. + The Ren. Frauds X. Collins 'City. Hall Salem. Massachusetts _ + Dear ltr. Mayor ;'The'Plauding:Boafrd of the'C1ty o#- Saleaa z °, '' requests an appropriation for, the ".'Advertising of the new Zoning' Regulations NP °f fi and 9fap, . in the Salem Ness, 'in' the ' i amount;of $2136.00. ie aecesisary fo This appropriatioforthe`" AI . secoud advrrtislug oY the Zoninglu tbe.:_c Salem News. + { 4P s , FLAMING S%RD, CITE' .tIP SAISM 1' a 4 . a • _ Y d v • u w' yP C t a} HAIRUM r . t n , aP r _ p , i FORM A REChiVED APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT MAR I1 II eWAMLU BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL CITY CLERK'S OFF4CEone completed form with the Planning Board SALEM, MASS p g and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., . . . .M81 h u. . . . . . ., To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant . . . .40A.4 .`omy • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Address . . . . 316. .War=.,5t*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Name of Engineer or .Surveyor . . .iM+KiA T. .B�.Id. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address . . . . UWAYOU0.S.twq. OAUID'.KWA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Deed of property recorded in $0 SO.11th,4ffiLr9Ct. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Registry, Book . . . . .5022 . . . . . . . . . . Page . .62. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Location and Description of Property: 5 Ord Street Md Cad Strut Court Signature of ow Address r,..11. me:-iom CITY OF SALEM � In City Council ._ Marsh 1.1 Ordered: '1`haC the sum of 'fwo 'Phousand One HundrEd 'fhirty 5' �� II• rw I$21'ifi- 001 be - and hereby is appropriated from "REVENUE" to the "General Government" item "City Planning Board" sub item "Advertisin . " Said sum to be added to sums heretofore appropriated for this Purpose. In City Council March .111965, Adopted under sus. of rules: -- APPRdM BY T11L Iquora on MAR 151 1965 � 1 b ATTI45T s -- UdUb r T Q, , CTT'l v1.E12K March 18, 1965 • PLANNING BOARD -'CITY OF SALEM Meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board Office, Thursday, March 18th, 1965 at 7:30 P.M. Present : Chairman John B. Hooper, Philip Litman and Michael Paskowski On motion made and seconded it was VOTED: To waive the reading of the Minutes of previous Meeting Form A Application of Norman Bedard presented and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To delay action until the Board looked at the site. Form C application of Elizabeth Thibault was presented and it was VOTED: To return the Form C application and notify her to re-submit on Form A application Form A Application of John J. Toomey regarding land on Ord Street Court was submitted and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To take the application under advisement. Form A Application of James Velonis regarding land on Hilton and Frederick Streets was presented and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To take under advisement On motion duly made and seconded it. was VOTED: To hold a special Meeting on March 29th to take up the Form A application and meet with the Redevelopment Authority Discussion was held regarding the DiBiase Corp. Subdivision in reference to letter from Neal Mitchell, City Engineer to the Planning Board. The Developers will comply with: Item 1. 08 III Item 2. Lots 124, 125, 126,on Middle Street are to be deleted from the plans. Item 3. Covenant will be submitted by the Subdivider that no basements are to be built less than 1 foot above the sewer. Item 4. That the sewer line have a minimum of 3 feet of cover. Item 5. Same as Item 2. Item 6. Developer agrees to compact leets�to highway standards. Item 7. Will be complied with. Item 8. Deleted Item 9. Waived except for reverese curve • Item 10. Developer will take particular care>:.of; grad-*-ng whengrade is below 1% which occurs on one point on Valley Street. Item 11. Planning Board will look at there the water goes from the swale towards Highland Avenue. Letter from George Vallis dated February 5th was taken up by paragraph: March 18, 1965 Planning Board - Page 2 { •j Paragraph l: Item waived 2. Radius of curve to be waived as specified except reverse curve on Witch Way to be corrected 3. 50 foot street waived,allowing 40 foot streets. 4. Developer may use bituminous concrete curbs City Engineer Mitchell spoke of problem from two storm drains entering sewer on Abbott Street and the difficulty correcting this violation of the County Sewer Code. In the opinion of the City Engineer the sewer would handle all the houses in the Sub- division if the storm water were not entering the sewer line. Mr. Egan of Peabody spoke for a group of landowners regarding flooding of the brook carrying storm water from the uplands in Salem during heaving water run off. He expressed concern that any additional development will greatly aggravate this present poor condition. It was decided to refer the problem of rights of use of Brook be referred to the City Solicitor for a ruling. On motion duly made and seconded it was Voted; To take up the matter of the Subdivision at the next regular Meeting in April • Mr. Saverio Ciruolo requested the Board to allow him to reappear before the Board of Appeals for a variance of the premises at 22 Irving Street because of additional information that was not provided at the original hearing. On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To approve this request under Chapter 40A, Sec. 20 of the General Laws. On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To adjourn at 10:30 P. M. Submitted . . . . . . . . . . . . . • R. + 4 a March 199 1968 Ys.' Elizabeth M. Thibault , 79 Lawrence Street Salem, Nass. ! f.. a . . w • ' Dear Madam: We are returning the Form C APplicatioq . with the plan and .linen. as this :applicaton " should have .bee.n .made�'on a Form A. w. - _ t 1 .Still you please resubmit it on a Form- - A ormA application?; Yours very`truly, PLANNING BOARD, CITY AF .SALEM JOHN D. HOOPBR, :CHAIRMAN n r ¢ rv• a y F Axn M r, r 'A• {1 y may, ♦,flak. '� A ��- )'': §Ne � > tib:r^ i�� # � e " .� � i � 'A' .p F �S. .,fie . .a.`,w � tin ' Ol +y ♦ r^a y r«y rn - sP y*y 14 �r �'.. ! r* 4 4 �'S m JKr f 1. A. a �.� y f 9e3,�e 1 � 'Y.0 A � rK1. ,~-•�I It w Y- e r w°p .r a d� { y , r� 4 r� Y " r4 � h' '- ! � •. 44 .��"♦' r p { . f .� W L S `F' y y A.' moi. y�,. �' r, � t - n t, a •y ,°y, � 'fl � i Q '. .,, s �At ''t• dy c �^ i+.• t a �; M �1. s"•ra: V ..... r - 24 z,:..r `P k SIT• 4 f'.• d"1• ' } �t �y nr A 'F � ' ^ y" - . r"n r If { M1 E4 r y fit 5,t tn . J. 1 p. • 5 W L W a.r^ Ems'. �• p .�f p i aM`I-. "����� '. u ♦ yy .y!• a �' _•�� i1' . . t eq" ,Xi �P..13 T^niyiI n .A p.r r. °1 •,r fie:' �� pa vi, r sY • r �:. ' a r � y r MAR 16 10 24 AM 165 planning Poarb CITY CLLr;K.'S OFFICE SALEM. MASS. 34 Church Street FORM A Aalem, Massachusetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., - ¢ _ll`--------------------19_ � To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____-___ QF_______________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. / • 1. Name of Applicant ------- �� 4 c�cci�L__ �j / —Cti -------------------------- Address ------`�----- s_lL - 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor___ _vStic2 aZ____ ______-_ ____✓�_ ;_________ Address - � P ,¢`':=( 3. Deed of property records in _`S r�=^ - __ Q- Registry - ----------- -- ---------- - Book ---7Z-1------------ Page -----5- ------- ------ 4. Location and Description of Property_ ----------------------------------- ---------- - _______-- Signature of Ownera _ _� ----gypp �v�y"`-'-�'-'^------------------- Address -3 � �� `n_ 2oi_----------- FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., 19. 12 s To the Planning Board: s The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of i Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant . . . . . . Ale. . /S Address . . . . . . . . . . S7.� . . . . . . . . /. .G.4 , . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor . . . . . .E3 ! v, /,n S!t / c , , , , . . . . . Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex So.Dist.. Registry. of. Deeds. . . . Registry, 5226 669 Book . 512.9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 562. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Location and Description of Property: Salem, Mass. (Pierpont Pwk) FreAerick St. Lots 53, 54 & 55 Pl. B. 12 Pl. 27 W 1121ton St. Lots 611, 65 & 66 Pl. B. 12 Fl. 27 Uj Oto a S c t� LI +i W J >- h V • Signature of owner/,....Ao Address .fes. ��a��°O ✓T b ♦ F 4 _ - 1 Ol _A.•i T a ( r $ March ,M '1965 iwe _ a N, . t i . ' < March 29, 1965; A �.i Normand, Bedard, 3. Preston,;:Road; Salem;- miss. Lard on Story Road, 6alem 'v *+_• y x f --T i T .. { } � "' P `" 5 Yr 1 t � e 27 30 Section A n _ A. o t:, •l ¢PIrAMUNGr BGARD, CITY of SALEM !' '� � ..:. +� .. r ._ani � p '• ♦' _ b , a �a • _ - — a—_ _ _ _ —_ _ z ;R. (9i#u of �$ttiem, gassar4use##s r T 3 7T ^r r ' LOUIS E. BAKER.CHAIRMAN JAMES J. MUSE. CLeRK - }- JOHN M. GRAY. JR. 34 (91lluLth *rttt RAYMOND F. SWEENEY JOHN B. HOOPER Salem, f NSsRChusett8 March 30, 1965 Mr. James Velonis 9 Wallis Street Peabody, Mass. Dear Sir: , At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on March 29, 1965 it was voted: - To notify you that your application under Form A dated March 17, 1965 for determination and endorse- ment that Planning Board Approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required of a plan Frederick St. and Hilton St. Land is hereby denied for the reason that it is not accompanied by the necessary evidence to show that the plan does not require approval as set forth by Section IT, Paragraph B of the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations of the City of Salem. Does not have sufficient Munici}al Services. You may submit a new application Form A complying with the Rules and Regulations and such new application should be dated when it is submitted. Very truly yours, PLANNING BOARD, .CITY OF SALEM Clerk, Salem Planning Board CC CITY CLERK ........... ............ ................................ ..........................—........ No..----- SALEM, To the Departmental Officer making the Payment: Received of.._ .....Ch;Aixmana----5rilgui-Riamaing-BgLard.............................. the sum of —------ ----------------------------------------------------Fnr-t-y=Flxe---------and.._._-50/14Q_........--- --- ------------------------------ ...............------------------ ---------Dollars, forthe-----------------------------perioA......--------------------------------------- ending.-----------April-I lrqw',, Z----------------------- ---........................_........for collections as per schedule of this date,filed in my office. - —--------- - ----------- - ----- _ atm- _ -- 1 v Tre r.r. --------------------------- a w U w x x a w E4 r W T Tbaik LM *VOl . :l.Cir tio nmite X - ega twv,.Oo? +. • f t r y ` v v* - •• - e =t - ♦. a '• e r a t 1• Cty of "5§ttlPm, '�RnssttcljusettS Planning Pnacrb 34 64=4 Street �ttlem, 'fflttssttdlusetts April 2, 1965 Mr; Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sirs At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on April 1. 1965 it was VOTEN - To endorse "Approval of Definitive Plan" on the following described plans "Subdivision Plan, Witchcraft Heights, Owner DiBiase .Brothers, Inc, , January • 290 1965, Carter & Towers, Eng, Corp." 1, Applicants DiBiase Brothers, Inc, 25 Acorn Street Malden, Massachusetts 2. Location and desoriptiona Approximately 38 acres of land located at the rear of Ord Street and Valley Street _ Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board r FORM A APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT APR 5 9 43 AN 965F PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL CITY CEI K'S OFFICE File one completed g SALEM MASS. p eted form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., 19." To the Planning Board: The undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant . . .I.(pp J. ./ ._ . . . . . . . . Address . . . .7. .L . . . . . . . J ;. . . . 4,�Q.m. . . . . . 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor . .E4 w.l h . . .13 .K.q`'.z�.n S ,�l. . . . . . . . . . I Address . . . . . � �.�.y—!�.��.G.��:4' . . 5�:. . . . . .Sci . . :. . . . . 3. Deed of property recorded in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Registry, Book . .qZ . . . . . . Page . . . . .�.� Z . . . . . . . . 4. Location and Description of Property: C.p r as e o hQ w .-e.v c 2 St P � Signature of owner r� Address !•% . . . .a!! ? em.4e. �l ,. . . . . . . . March 30, 1965 PLANNING BOARD - CITY OF SALEM A Special Meeting of the Planning Board was held at the Redevelopment Authority Office, Monday Evening, March 29th, 1965, at 7.30 P. M. Chairman John B. Hooper presided Form A Application of John J. Toomey 36 Warren Street, Saleip, Mass. was presented to determine that the property at 5 Ord Street and Ord Street Court does not constitute a Sub- division within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To endorse Form A Application of Norman Bedard 3 Preston Road, Salem, Mass. , was presented to determine that the property at Story Road, Salem, does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly 4kade and seconded it was VOTED: To endorse Form A Application of James Velonis 9 Wallis Street, Beabody, Mass. was presented to determine that the property at Frederick and Hilton Sts. , does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To deny as the land does not have sufficient Municipal Services. There being no other business to come before the Meeting it was VOTED: To adjourn at 7.45 P. M. SIGNED: . . . . . . . . . . . April 2, 1965 PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM Meetind of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board Office, April 1st, 1965 at 7.30 P.M. PRESENT: Chairman Hooper and Messes Litman and Paskowski Minutes of the previous regular Meeting read and Approved. Minutes of Special Meeting of March 29th read and approved. Form A Application of Elizabeth M. Thibault 79 Lawrence Street, Salem was presented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To deny and return Form to Applicaat.:to be properly. filed. It had not been stamped by the City Clerk. Form A Application of George S. Diantgikis and others was presented for Subdivision of land on Hilton Street and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To deny as there are not sufficient Municipal Services available on Hilton Street. Form A Application of Bay State Belting Company for land on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road was presented to determine that the property does not constitute a Subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Cgntrol Law and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To endorse. Letter was read from the City Council requesting acceptance of Calabrese Street and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To refer the letter to the City Engineer for his comments. Letter was received from City Engineer Mitchell dated April 1st regarding work to be done on the Abbott Street sewer. Representative of DiBiase Subdivision explained plans to alleviate drainage on Abbott Street and divert drainage to Proctor Street and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To approve the Subdivision known as Witchcraft Heights with the following stipulations: 1. - Lots 89 through 97 shall not be built upon until adequate drainage and sewerage is provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. 2. - Lots 124 through 127 on Middle Street are not to be included as part of .the Subdivision. 3 . - Other stipulations which are on the Plans as notes one through five. , April 2, 1965 PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM Page 2 On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: John M. Gray, Jr. be Chairman of the Board On motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: Michael Paskowski be Clerk of the Board John B. Hooper has tendered his resignation from the Planning Board of the City of Salem, effective April 2nd, 1965. Submitted: . . . . . . . . . . N g 01i#u of olein, �zssttc �zse##� ��R e Planning �Inttrd LOUIS E. BAKER.CHAIRMAN. JPME9 J• MUSE, CLERK - - rrrtrt JOHN M GRAY,JR. 34 (94urrh *reE} RAYMOND F. SWEENEY - �Su'em ,Ipl7ps$MrLU$Q}}g JOHN B. HOOPER A C'" •t April 2t 1988 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on Thursdayo April lst91988 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law . • Not Required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant Hay State Belting Company 80 Grove Street, Salem, Bass. 2. Location and Description Land on Grove Street and Harmony Grove Road 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book Page Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, PLANNING BOAR1Dj CITY OF SALEM Clerk, Salem Planning Board _.uT x Yr-r k Ye - 1 T- - i+ y f >t • . } • y e ` s } y 'S c + '" #" .:4. ..# , ♦ it 4y' � i � ¢ 1 �:. 9APPil�. ► . leh�$ . 3 , # ss , , -Ms..Elizabeth' M. 'Thibault } 9 LawrenceBtreet '7 . Salem .Mass.-. a ! Dear Ms 'Thibault. ,t. r We are:.returnidg`.your Form A application ` F as it =does°hot have the stamp of -the City Clerk's -Office,', therefore, the ;Planning Hoard could not act won it. + Very' truly yours, a PLANNING HQA$D, CITY, OF 911I:Hlt .Y_...'fie•F[f. -1 „f � r., � s. 5 'v `S'.� 4 , + JOBN'B., HOOPER* CHAIRMAN 4.7 M , • e c a,• y Y• R F� lr. ��-Mr # n i {fy .5 ate- • • q" Xr JENNINGS & JENNINGS ATTORNEYS AT LAW so SECURITY TRUST BUILDING 23 CENTRAL AVENUE TELEPHONES .JOSEPH W.JENNINGS LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS LYNN 5-3333 JOHN J. .JENNINGS LYNN 5-3334 March 24, 1965 Planning Board City of Salem 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: I re: land on Hilton St. , Salem Enclosed herewith please find Application for Endorsement of Plan Believed Not to Require approval in regard to the above matter. Would you kindly notify this office as to the Hate of hearing. Very truly pyo/UF'�,� John J. Jennings �JJJ:ms V enc. 2 - Form A and linen copy of plan cc: City Clerk City Hall Salem, Massachusetts enc. 2 - Copy of Form A and copy of plan • s - c ,i• r ; ' . r ,f F a `,`•r °`� '` i;F- ° !'�'' ' a Y t ,Fn` {.:' t .hr "' • •S April` 2, -:1965 n ` 6 Itl ys• -i F �.c x a e. Mr: John J 'Jenning®.. 4 a . ' 23 Central Avenue : dye . `Lynn, Kass.: Dear Sir, i Varerurnig'FomA Application of s George; S. - Diantgikis r Louis Nikolopoulos: ' a 1 Potter -Kallianmotes 3 �r Y r - •y 3+ .dd i -.f or Subdivision Approval, which we +have l . F ="had to deny as, Municipal Servioes ar_ e M O ° w ' ,. not available on Hilton Street. `Yours very -truly, s F ` x l PLANNINGBOARD, CITY OF SALEM Y - _• 'JOHN B: HOOPE$, CHAIRMAN,•- _ - e^ a F tit F # '4 1 �+ "•ti -Linen also- encloser P . e t la ♦�' 4 of "d F " - 1 - � a v Y Aprii♦ . 1y Nr *Neal' liftciiii t �• r ,City Engineer f {_ City 'Ha f Salemi NasB. .�. aA ♦, f " �` � ' .r=}.. ~_ Aear Sir: 1Ie- have, received a letter friom the;'Citq � Council' Askin for s 0 i g ppr -. oval of the, lay *' 1 out of Calabresme Street,-' y�" ! ♦ _ _ c. t •. � f q .1 � t 1.- � 'a _ - 4 T .. `!�. Wi1lAyou-: please'check_,theaplan and_,_let mouse-have, your comments_.on the ,Street? Yours very ,truly, PIANNINO -BOARD#":CITY Off SALEM 4a17 V > > JOHN B'.' HOOPER0 CHAIRMAN y fit i Lf + `• Q•YP _ Ctv of ttlem, 'Massar4usetts Wire of t4e (9itV a r- qw/M.Nc vOMr epp19 �it$1T8{[1TE J- VYIIIIt112�'f CHH oink March 29, 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sire: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, March 25, 1965 the enclosed order was adopted. Very truly yours, Order & Map enclosed. AUG=nM J. TOOW CITr CLERK Form C-76-62-00\i SALEM . ,R� a CITE' 01 In City. Council -_.__.March•25-- -_19 �R ♦ A�fMIFG Ordered. Y i That the aaocsmpawing plans be mferred ti y,,c: Mmming Board for "their recommendation as to the acceptance of Calabrese Street as a Public Way. n v i r. +( , r . A J Todwy_— --- - / r 1 . ♦ E :.• a • S � - I� s y r @Ii#g n# tt1em, ttsstttliusetts • �;r ,` ' � Department of Puhlie Forks �RE'cp�E NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER April 1,1965. Mr. John Hopper, Chrm. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sir : With the approval of the City Solicitor, the Public Works Dept. plans to disconnect the catch basins from the sanitary sewer in Abbott Street and connect them to the existing storm sewer. It is our intention to do this work within the next few weeks . This should, in my opinion, allow adequate capacity in the exist- ing sanitary sewer to serve the proposed DiBiase subdivision. • Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell cc City Solicitor • O :b Ctv of �tlem, Ittss�tt ixse##s Of�fiMlN.•N+'f g19 �lt�ltSfiY[E J-QZIIDIttP�i . Tug(96A April 12, 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sirs:- At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, April B. 1965 the following appointments of the Mayor were confirmed by unanimous roll call vote. The reappointment of Michael Paskowski, 20 Bow Street for a term of 5 yrs. expiring May 1, 1970. • The appointment of Gerald T. McCarthy, 6 Lowell Street for a term expiring May 1, 1969 - to fill the vacany left by the resignation of John B. Hooper. CITY CLM.K C-4 ,a c a4ze- -- bc,c Nit G - 4 `TSJ .2a 45 40 - -- - - c R l L-0 —/ , --_ r uj 15 April 1965 Record of Regular Business Meeting Salem Planning Board Held at Church Street Office, 15 April 1965 Members present: John Gray, Chairman Albert Pitcoff - succeeding Philip Litman Gerald McCarthy - succeeding John Hooper Michael Paskowski After welcoming the two new members, the meeting was opened at 7:30 P. M. with the following order of business: 1. Form "A" application of Elizabeth Thibault. Insuf- ficient data on sketch including names of abutters. Returned with request that she appear at next meet- ing with all data available to her. This applica- tion was first read at the 1 April 165 meeting and denied for same reasons. 2. Form "A" application of James Velonis, 9 Wallis Street, Peabody, concerning land between Hilton and Frederick Streets, off Belleview. Application • appeared to be in order and was approved. 3. Form "A" application of Edward N. Harris of 26 West Avenue -- Approved. 4. A delegation representing Salem and .North Shore Babies Hospital spoke of their need for an access road from the back of the hospitals to Jefferson Avenue, opposite Ocean Avenue. Purpose is to provide for projected ex- pansion of hospital facilities in rear of present es- tablishment. It was noted that a school site is presently being considered in that area and that the road would cross park land and property of Massachusetts Electric. They were told the request would be given consideration. This concluded business at hand and the meeting was adjourned. = a ip P� • CITY OF HAVERHILL MASSACHUSETTS SIXTEEN COURT STREET ZANE A. BOWER HAV ERHILL. MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DIRECTOR TELEPHONE 375-8880 April 23 , 1965 Dear Sir : We are making a restudy of our present ordinance • on "Garden Apartments" as they apply to the city of. Haverhill , We would appreciate any material you have on "Garden Apartments" in your community as they appear in your Zoning Enabling By-Laws . Thanking you in advance , Sincerely yours , Zane A. Bower Planning Director ZAB : z Lh�� yl� iq•! 6 May 1965 Record of Regular Business Meeting Salem Planning Board Held at Church Street Office, 6 May 1965 Members presents John Gray,-: Chairman Albert 'Pitcoff Gerald McCarthy Michael Paskowski Meeting was opened at 7:30 P.. M. and business .conducted in the following order: 1: Minutes .of the previous regular business meeting were read and approved. 2. Form "A" .application of Elizabeth Thibault, 79 Law- rence Street,' Salem-- This case, concerning land at the corner of Lawrence and Parallel Streets, was read at the previous two meetings but because of Insufficient data on sketch was tabled with request that applicant appear before board. At this meeting a spokesman was present and explained that they wished to out off 850 square feet of land from the present 3500 square feet lot for the purpose of building a garage., The board pointed out that this was not properly Form A but subd191sion and that .the original lot was already substandard in size. Request was denied. 3. Form "C" application of Leo C. Bennett, 22 Sunset Road, Salem-- This concerned the transfer of land. between adjacent lots on Sunset Road, changing frontage from 70 and 55 feet toa'65 and 60 feet.. It was moved In favor and • so approved. No linen was received with the sketch so the applicant was asked to have one prepared and brought in for sig- nature. 4. Form "A" application of. Arthur King,- 7 Wall Street, Salem-- Sketch shows the proposed division of a 5700 square foot lot at the corner of Wall and Ober Streets into Record of Regular Business Meeting Salem Planning Board 6 May 1965 Page 2 two equal parts. This area, dust large enough for a single house, would become two lots badly undersize for building purposes. The case has a history of the Board of Appeals tak- ing it under advisement on one 000asion, approving it on another, then reconsidering and sending it to the Planning Board. Mr: King was present with Councilor John Butler and spoke about his allergic children. He also submitted a letter from Dr. Flynn. We pointed out that the application is not properly Form "A" and suggested that he withdraw it and sub- mit it to the Council where a variance might be granted on the basis of hardship. 5- Form "A" application of Thomas Mackey & Sons, 50 Broadway, Salem-- . 7 Mr. Mackey was present and said that he wished to sell 369700 ,square feet of beckland to Desjardins, an abutter. He was advised that this was not prop- erly Form "A" and that he should withdraw this ap- plication and file it on Form "B" as a subdivision. He agreed to do so. 6. Form "A" application of Dibiast Bros. , 25 Acorn Street, Malden.. Thisconcerned land on Valley and Middle Streets where lots 75M through 75U on land court map would have frontages changed from 50 to 70 feet. Approved. 7. Form "A" application of Ernest W- Farley .for sub- division of land on •West Avenue. Two equal sized lots would be created having a frontage of 49 feet and area of 5468 square feet each. Approved. This concluded business at hand. John Hooper, who sat through the meeting, next reviewed our decisions on the various appli- cations. He also spoke on topics concerning the administra- tion of the board, until time ran out, Meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:30 P. M. / � r� FORM C • APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF DEFINITIVE PLAN File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section III-B. Salem, Mass. , May 5 1965 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Definitive Plan of property located in the City of Salem for approval as a subdivision under the requirements of the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules and Regu- lations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem. • 1. Name of Subdivider LEO C. and OLIVE M. BENNETT Address 22 SUNSET ROAD, SALEM, MASS. 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor A. R. MASSA C. E. Address4 CLEVELAND ROAD, BEVERLY, MASS. 3. Deed of property recorded in ESSEX COUNTY Registry, Book 3776 Page 410 4. Location and Description of Property: 22 Sunset Road, Salem, Mass. , Single family residence. Signaturef owner ,e � Address 4010 Galt Ocean Drive • Ft Lauderdale, Fla, 33308 A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is at- tached. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. d � a I d q. j iN I ✓ AN D y dWev 0 p Ay 2 - Q { f s 's f cs ��ff/f /� ��yy _ ,-43•' �1 � 1 zz 107 , 71AW-11/ '7r7b 7 j �� .4 rrtr �� a i �.vsv8 � 7 a \ JL ,\� � > or F v May 5 1965 TO THE PLANNING BOARD CITY OF SALEM MASS Addendum to Form C for approval of definitifre plan. Ruyprg have agreed , and bank has approved mottgaae for land and buildings, sixty-five by one hundred five square foot at 22 Sunset Rd, subject to approval of planning board, This would result in Lot 45A (22 Sunset Road) containing 6825 square feet instead of the present 5600 square feet, xxdx Lot 45A does not presently conform with current zoning ordinances, and the addition of rear depth 25 by 65 would establish a more suitably defined house and land parcel, for the prospective buyers, As Lot 45A evidently was originally in violation, the side footage of xqxsxje feet by 105 ft bquare would then confunn the adjacent lot to 1„ May 11, 1965 Re: Mr. Edward IV. Harris Leo C. and Olive M. Bennett DiBiase Bros, Mr. Augustus Toomey City Clerk 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: On May 6, 19650 the Planning Board endorsed the plan of Mr. Edward w• Harris with the endorsement reading, "Approval under Subdivision Control Law not required." Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ/,jm �t A t/r , • May 11, 1965 Mr, William B. Welch 221 Essex Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Welch: We are returning, herewith, the endorsed copy of the plan of Mr. Edward A'. Harris of 26 Westam Avenue, Salem, • Massachusetts. Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGT/jm Enclosure • 3 .T eLePHOPH NE 744-0897 RE91oENCE 697-9608 LAW OFFICES • WILLIAM B. WELCH 221 ESSEX STREET SALEM, MASS, 01570 TIMOTHY J. DAVERN April 21, 1965 Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: I left a plan made by Edwin Brudzynski on property located on West Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts. Would you kindly certify that it does not need your approval for recording. Your,\sI very truly, ( ' , n to X) — w— � "`^&K� WB:WT • (Situ of �$tt1em, 'Cassar4usetts . � RECEIVED planning '�30ttxb APR 9 12 s6 PH 19 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 34 (94um4 fRreet SALEM MASS. FORMA �ulem, nssar!?useits APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., —April- 9-0------------------------19 65 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- because it is a division between two sets of heirs of a familv___lot -- __ - ------------------------------------------'---------------------------------------------------------- ------------' -to__av-01- --- --pati11011--for___part1t1Qn• -and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I. Name of Applicant ____—Edward N. Harris -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As Address _ 26West_Avenue - - - - - - - 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor-----------------E-dwim-Brudzynski------------------------------------------------_-_ Address ---------------------------------------P-6Q-_Lafdyette-St,_# IAAL - 3. Deed of property records in ___R se7C__S®lith District____________Registry Book ------4346---------- Page --189 -------------- 4. Location and Description of Property�ll-_26 htest__AYCnue __fo2�mer7y_owned_b _th&_ __-familq of Harris and divided because _of---death---of prev--ious owners. Now in two parcels. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Edward N. Harris By his attorne z Signature of Owner --- -------------- Williim B. Welch Address -----------------?21--Fsset --dt.t-- aletns--IAs83-r-------- ,r r RECORD OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING SALEM PLANNING BOARD Held at Church Street Office - 20 May 1965 All members were present and chairman John Gray opened the meeting at 7:30 with the Form "A" application of Thomas Mackey & Sons, Inc. , Broadway, Salem, Mass. This concerned the transfer of 229460 square feet of land from the rear of their property fronting on Broadway, to the rear of Eugene Levesque's property, an abutter, front- ing on Lilly Street. Nackey's attorney explained this appli- cation which was found conforming and approved. At the previous meeting a Form "A" was presented by Mr. Mackey in person, for the transfer of more' land to the same abutting property under a different title. From the informa- tion on hand it was ruled that this application was not proper- ly Form "A" and Mr. Mackey agreed to withdraw it and file on Form "B". Next, a letter from the City Clerk, requesting acceptance of Quadrant Road as a public way, was read. The matter was tabled until a conference could be held with the City Engineer. Dan O'Brien, the Building Inspector, then spoke on some of his problems. Foremost was the accelerated number of ap- plications for permits to build in business area--particularly Boston Street--in anticipation of it being rezoned "residential". He was advised to be governed by the old zoning laws until the new one was adopted by City Council and signed by the Mayor. His next question concerned Swimming Pools. He said that he has nothing in present laws to govern them. He -was advised that under new zoning ordinance it will fall under Special Per- mits issued by Board of Appeals. Mr. O'Brien also asked that he be notified of any decisions by the Board which concerned him. In the third order of business, George P. Vallis, Attorney for DiBiast Bros. , and Salem Acres, Inc. , submitted a letter noting the change of the Developer of sub-division entitled Witchcraft Heights and approved by Planning Board 1 April 1965, from DiBiasi Bros. , to Salem Acres, Inc. It was so approved and noted on officeP rints At this point it was discovered that his vellums had names of streets printed in ink. He wasadvised wised that they sheiUld be in pencil until approved by City Council., r i RECORD OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING SALEM PLANNING BOARD -2- 20 May 1965 At Next, a delegation seeking the acceptance of Cala- brestreet and headed by their Ward Councilor, presented their problems to the Board. Here was a typical case be- fore the Subdivision Control Act when developers provided minimal construction on their streets and vanished after property was sold. Before long construction degenerated in- to substandard conditions. A letter from the City Engineer was read saying that he does not know what was built under- ground on Calabrese Street. Delegation was informed that a survey of their storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, etc. , would first have to be made by some engineering firm, financed either by private funds or appropriation by City Council. In the sixth order of business, Stuart Carroll, from the office of UPHAMS Realtors, 1g9 Dodge Street, Beverly, spoke for the Form "A" application of Leo C. Bennett, con- cerning land at 22 Sunset Road. He was told that the application was approved at the f previous meeting but no vellum was submitted for signature. Ff The seventh and final order of business was John Bar- rett and his delegation on Heritage Plaza - East. They sub- mitted a write-up containing five points of discussion con- cerning zoning in their area, with some recommendations. They were told the pamphlet would be read and given con- sideration. John Hooper, who sat through the meeting, next con- tinued his discourse on administration with explanation of forms and bookkeeping until adjournment at 10 P. M. � E MAY 10 12 21 pH '65 Planning 19uttrb-i CITY CLERK'S OFFICEPIL SALEM, MASS, 34 (Qhurrlj 6treet FORM A Aalem, 4vassar4metts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL, File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ------- May__20,......Ig _-65 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant ----------ThomasMackey & Sons_, Inc------------------------------------------------------ Address --------------------------Br_oadwag_,__SaLeln,__MassacbusQtts-------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----E_dwi.TL_T�--- rldd2y_i]&1Ci--------------------------_-_-_-______,_____---__________ Address --------------------------260_LafA-V etteSt._� SalemMasS,-------------------------___- 3. Deed of property records in __________________________________-______________ Registry Book •---------- -- Page ---------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -------Off----Broadway_,...containing___ 22 ,460 .......... _feet �nd _further described in plan attached hereto. --------------------------------------- . -- -- - ------ THOMAS MACKEY & SONS, INC. BY Signature of Owner ___eG_�xal_ _[_Vvl__a-C --------___------- Address ___........____Broadway�__Salem,-_Mass---_-------_-----_____ May 25, 1965 Mr. Neal Mitchell City Engineer City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Mitchells A week or so ago, I talked to you about a proposal that was submitted to the Planning Board by the Salem Hospital and the North Shore Babies Hospital' s trustees. They are asking for the city to nun a new street into the rear of the property from Jefferson Avenue. The point that they wish to have the city street from is Ocean Avenue, and the street will extend across Highland Park and into the hospital approximately in the . center, more or less directly behind the new Babies Hospital building. I told the trustees at the meeting that the Planning Board was in no position to recommend one way or another until the entire matter was investigated. At our last Planning Board meeting, I told the other members we would invite you to our next meeting, if you possibly can attend. Our meeting will be Thursday, June 3, at 7:30 p.m. at our office on Church Street. I would ask you to bring whatever maps, street plans, proposed surveys, etc., of these areas so that the Planning Board would come to some decision. If you cannot make the meeting, would you please advise us when you could come. Personally, from the little knowledge I have of the area, I do not see why Wilson Road could not be developed and an extension made from it near the entrance to Highland Park. I do not see taking land by eminent domain unless no other alternative exists. In any event until I am shown differently that would be my attitude. Thank you for any help you can give us. Sincerely yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ/jm May 179 1965 COPY ADDRESSED ALSO TO MR. PHILIP LITMAN - 49a BRIDGE ST. '- SALEM, MAS. Mr. John B. Hooper Salem Laundry Company One Lafayette Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear John: On Tuesday, May 25 and ldedneaday, May 26 the City Council is holding public hearings on the propoakl new zoning, Ordinance at 8 p.m. in the Council Chamber. The Planning Board will be represented there, and I would appreciate it if you, as a fon"r member of the Planning Board who was actively engaged in the draft of the ?.oning Ordinance, could be present and speak in favor of the Ordinance. As you wolf know, very few proponants are available, and the only people that will be there are those v+e are opposing certain sections of the Ordinance. Also, if you could speak to other eivio-adnded individuals it would be greatly appreciated. Thanking you in advance, `1neerely, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ�,jm f May 11, 1965 Re: South River Development Mr. Richard W. Poitras 4 Linden Avenue Salem, Massachusetts Dear Councillor Poitras: The Planning Board wishes to endorse the proposed development for the South River area. In the waterfront study that the Planning Board made over a year ago this was one of the areas that was pointed out that would be an area for a possible development, both for recrea— tion and for a hurricane refuge for small craft. The Planning Board feels that a development such as this is the fulfillment of the Master Plan that has been adopted by the City. Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ/jm ANG (9itV of �$ttlrm, Anssar4usetts f / 3epartrumt of Public Works obi.mtEo'�' NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER May 20,1965. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re: Calabrese Street Gentlemen: As requested by Mr . Hooper, I submit the following comments on Calabrese Street: the develpper did not submit plans showing the location of sewer or water lines installed by him so their location is unknown; the developer did not submit plans showing the grades and lines of his proposed street, nor the drainage facilities required; the developer did not actually construct a street as such; the developer did not set stone bounds to define the lines of the street. The attached plan shows conditions as could be readily determined on the ground, and the proposed grade that will drain the street to Jackson Street if so constructed. The proposed grade will not fit all the lots as they are presently graded. Vefy truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer encl. Copy City Ordinace on acceptance of "private" streets . 1 RECORD OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING SALEM PLANNING BOARD HELD AT CHURCH STREET OFFICE, 3 JUNE 165 All the members were present and the Chair declared the meeting open at 7:30 P. M. The first order of business was a letter from the Mass- achusetts Electric Co. requesting that land on Valley Street, for a proposed Sub-Station, be exempted from the zoning law. A motion was made and approved that a letter be written stat- ing that the Planning Board is not in opposition to it. Next, a letter from the Metropolitan Area Planning Council was read. It was an Invitation to a dutch-treat informal social hour and dinner. As the event was already past, no action was taken. Form "A" application of Leo C. Bennett, 4010 Galt Ocean Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, was taken up for the third consecutive meeting. It concerned the transfer of land and frontage between lot 45A and abutting land at 22 Sunset Road. This application was previously approved but no vellum was submitted for signature. A representative from Upham Realtors of 129 Dodge Street, Beverly, was spokesman at this meeting and presented the necessary vellum and sketches for signature. Next, City Engineer Neal Mitchell was questioned about the proposed back entrance to the Salem Hospital. It was con- cluded that: 1. 1200 foot road, terminating on Jefferson Avenue, opposite Ocean Street, would benefit nobody but the hospital. 2. Cost of new road, plus water line, would be in vicinity of $100,000, which is excessive for gains to the city, and 3. A new water line is not now necessary, especially with the Gallows Hill pipe stand in service. The Chair will inform the hospital of our views and sug- gest that they develop plans to tie in with Wilson Street. The matter of Calabrese Street acceptance as a public way was next discussed with the City Engineer. No new information was gained. It was decided that since the request was not formal, no action would be taken. Record of Regular Business Meeting Salem Planning Board -2- 3 June 165 In the final order of business, Salvatore Reale of Atlan- tic Street, requested permission to run a water line down Day Avenue, tying his house with Linden Street. The City Engineer, who is acquainted with the request, stated that it was not ap- proved procedure but that several others in the neighborhood had done this and the applicant could claim discrimination if denied. The board advised Mr. Reale to prepare plans and sub- mit them for consideration. This concluded business at hand and meeting was adjourned at 9:00 P. M. May 25, 1965 Mr. Augustus Toomey City Clerk 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomeyf Please be advised that the developer of the property located at the rear of Ord Street and Valley Street as shown on Subdivision Plan entitled, "Witchcraft Heights" and approved by the Planning Board on April 1, 1965, has changed. Its name is now the Salem Acres, Inc., rather than D1Biase Brother, Inc., as originally noted on the plan. A new plan was signed by the Planning Board to this effect on May 209 1965. Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ/jm GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 7442172 REE. 98 PLEASANT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744.119E June 7 , 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Subdivision "Witchcraft Heights" Salem Acres, Inc. Gentlemen: This is to inform you that I am this day writing • to the Salem City Council and recommending that they approve the naming of the various ways shown on the above-captioned plan. My client, Salem Acres, Inc. , therefore waives any rights to the naming of said ways which it may have derived by the Planning Board's approval f said subdivision plan. V t� ly rs, 1 orge Vallis, Attorn y for Salem Acres, Inc. GPV/ijp • GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 7443172 REE, 89 PLEASANT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744.1195 June 7, 1965 Honorable City Council City Hall Salem, Massachusetts ATTENTION, Mr, John Burke Honorable City Councils Please be advised that the Planning Board has approved the Subdivision Plan entitled, "Witchcraft Heights" a copy of which Is herein enclosed. The developer, Salem Acres, Inc., has given tentative names to the various ways within the sub- division subject to your approval. It has attempted • to choose names flavored with the historical back. ground of Salem namelyi Gables Circle, Gallows Hill Road, Puritan Road, Pioneer Circle, Witchcraft Road, Witch Way and Couldron Court. In behalf of my client, I respectfully recommend to the Honorable City Council that the names of these ways be approved in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 85 Section 3A and Salem General Ordinances, Chapter 28, leotion 2 and that this body take such action in this matter as it may deem best. Very truly yours, George P. Vallis, Attorney for Salem Acres, Inc. OP%r/13p Enclosure oc Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 74,.217E REE. 88 PLEASANT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1188 May 20, 1965 Planning Board City of Salem 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: Please be advised that the devebpe•r of the property located at the rear of Ord Street and Valley Street as shown on Subdivision Plan entitled, "Witchcraft Heights" and approved by the Planning Board on April 1, 1965 will • be Salem Acres, Inc. , rather than DiBiase Brothers, Inc, as originally noted on the plan. Would you kindly make a note to this effect on your records. Ve tru re George Vallis, j Attorn y for DiBiase Brothers, Inc, and Salem Acres, Inc, GPV/1 jp cc Mr. Augustine A. Toomey City Clerk City Hall Salem, Massachusetts t `: Titu of $-,Avnt; ���ttfiSMtlIlt9Ftt5 A/ ) 34 Ujt=4 �'%trrrt $altm, 1Glneerrltuutte September .'8 , 1966 v Register of Deed- Essex South Dlstri. • Registev of Deed 32 Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: The condition referred to as Note 6 on a plan entitled Subdivision Plan "Witchcraft Heights" Ownert Salem Acres, Inc. , dated January 29 , 1965 and recorded in Essex South District Registry of Deeds , Plan Rook 104, Plan 55 which recites that , "Lots 1 to 23 , incla,ive and Lots 89 to 97, inclusive, shall not be built upon until adequate drainage and sewerage is provided to the satisfaction of the Planning P4 rd" has been complied with. i Pol ,, ion is therefore granted by this Board to Salem r commence building on the said lots subject •onditions as set forth in a Protective 18 , 1965 and recorded in said Registry ,- " Page 209 . i ^.a trn note to this effect in the , „t Lsy of Deeds. Very truly yours , anning Board: John N. '',ray . i' 1121 Albert N . Pi ; �i f Gerald T. MrCat ' Y J EnaCz 6ts . Recor 11 ,t Sc pt . .t 30 m . past 3 P. M . # 189 •�r�. GONUI ft11t#v of '*ttlem, Aassarhnse##s'r Planning �Iuttrb Mar 6 2 �t PM '65 crosc'- i oss ICE 34 (114mr11 street FORM A Salem, �assarhuseits APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., -�__3-r--I$65------------------------19-------- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. 11-A)--the 1_o__ts_kwere__pre_v_-iouslysubdivid'ad. 'on_a_Land_Court plan_ & Valley_St.__--_ 11an--i-�Rr-of-le--wHs__-aP-PMved1_-d2$L--the--_BIa13�-Baatd _April-4-r--I165--------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I. Name of Applicant _Di Labe---BrOSR--InCe------------------------------------------------------------------------ Address __25 Acorn-.Sty--IvlaLden,--lJas i.-------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor__Lar_tex--- __Tower-s---Engineering---CCorps__------------------------ Address 6-Faisui.ew-Ave.---Swampacatt,--hMaas-------------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in _.E&sex__South_I)i-stric-t_--------------Registry Book ------------------_-------- Page Land__Caur-t--Plan 856L Sheet '2 Filed with cert. # 648I 4. Location and Description of Property- -----------------------------------------------------------Shozan -a&--ItIL---- Thru __thru__75L_' Bounded_westerly___by_ Valley_---St._' ; snuther_ly-by_ 1i7 4�4�1g_ t�,__Easterly_ by___Lot"s1 ,7?Ai thru'r72E ;& lots 73A ,_ thru, 730, &' lot, 74(,, northerly byjSDiBiase' BrLos.,_Inc. Signature of Owner _Cl-_____ __ ____-___Pxe_sident-- U o DiBiase DiBiase Bros. Inc. „� Address ---_2§ Aeorn $ i AI don A4esgs - -- • RE _,j ce • L ,JuH Z IO 3o AN '65 FORM A CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MAS�PPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II--B. Salem, Mass. , June 2 19-63 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not constitute a subdivision within the meaning of • the Subdivision Control Law, herewith submits said plan for a determina- tion and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant Leo C. and Olive M. Bennett 4010 Galt Ocean Drive Address Fort Lauderdale, Florida 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor Essex Survey Service Frank c. hancock Address 275 Cabot St. , Beverly, Mass. 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Registry, 3776 409 (Lot 45A) Book 3938 Page 151 (adjoining lot) 4. Location and Description of Propperty. Lot #45A (22 Sunset Rd. ) presently containing 5600 sq.ft. (70 ' frt. x 80 ' d. ) , and the adjoining lot presently containing 9600 sq.ft. The Proposed changes are: (1 ) Add a piece 25' deep and 70 ' wide to the back of Lot 45A. (2) Subtract 5' of frontage froi* Lot 45A and Wdd it to the adjoining lot as shown on the accompanying plan. y Signature of owner Leo C. Bennett Address 129 Dodge St. Class. I f BERKAL & BERKAL TELEPHONE: PIONEER 5.4010 r� ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS-AT-LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET MARTIN BERKAL SALEM. MASS. BARRY D. BERKAL LEONARD A. BERKAL June 8, 1965 Planning Board Church St. Salem, Mass. Re : Seacoast Realty Co. , Inc. #L 26344 Vs: Ralph 0. Smithson, Jr. Gentlemen: We enclose petition for rehearing and will plan to attend your hearing scheduled for Wednesday, June 16, at 7 :30 p.m. to present the same and answer any questions you may have. Yours very truly, B RKAL & BE L Barry D. erkal BDB/ck Enc. c.n� PETITION FOR REHEARING The Seacoast Realty Co. ,Inc. of Salem respectfully petitions the Planning Board of the City of Salem under General Laws Chapter 400 Section 20 for permission for a rehearing of its petition for a variance, copy of which is annexed hereto marked "A". Said petition was heard by the Board of Appeal on May 3, 1965 and denied on May 13 , 1965 (see finding annexed hereto marked ITB IT. 1 ' It is the understanding of your petitioner that its petition may have been denied as a result of the impre6sion of some members of the Board of Appeal that the granting of the same would . create a conflict with the Planning Board. In`actual fact the plan` subdividing your petitioners property was endorsed by the Planning Board on July 18, 1963 , (see copy annexed hereto marked "C") . Your petitioner further says that at the time of the hearing it was unable to have counsel present�'and did not call to the -attention of the Appeal Board this endorsement and requests a rehearing so that it may be properly represented by counsel. Respectfully submitted, SEACO EAtTY CO. , INC. G��qi JJ • BERKAL & BERKAL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASS. h . THS SEAC6AST REALTY CO. ,INC. 4 r PETITION FOR REHEARING t s r - [,t F , From the office of : Berkal & Berkal - 70 Washington St.- Salem,Mass. o ' P 1 f Y'.arah 25. 1455 Board o1; Appeala City Nall c�ntla�n Afplication is hereby rade to the Board of Appeals for a variance following tbo refusal by the building Inspector for parmission to altar the building at f% Botts Court to d t provide for 4n agartmont therein, t Thia variance in requested under the provisions of Oenoral Lata Chapter 40A. Section 15 on the Grounds of hard. ( 7 v br. foapeetfully oubmi.ttod. SLACOAST 61'.AM CO.. IUC. its Attorno�yya. ° IzY S �Balri r*S+ 4c antl000 check rur �22. 55 . . -Ave rtitina e-.:is and will rorvard glans e%+ ._c .M..tru'ctiong plot plan i»3 dnalosed hsm*#i.'44j. } f 1 i f a N w ' 4 Salem Planning Board i f This letter will attest to approval under the Subdivision Control Law not rcugired on Plan #1121 { drawn by the Essex Survey Service dated June 18, 1963, recorded Essex South Book 5077 Page 600, as drawn for Seacoast Realty Co. Inc. r - Date 9l Essex ss. Recorded July 30, 1963. 55 m. past 10 A.M; #59 —_ r 1 a � ,i a .� Mown Nn'orso•b --- 4 .77 W if�! Ntl W'L�E „ � •. h/tlfrtd /7arrhe ndLIU % i h t. �✓M'oc'to"E tsa , t u 1 Ci#u of tt�pm, C tts ttrf��tsrtt� } try 13s, 1963. + JOHN M. ORwY I ARTNVR 1./1r p[CQU[ JOO[I41 P. OOVL[ PEITIO s Seacoast Realty Co,,, Inc,, a Botts court, To alter garage building to provide an apartment. On ranch 10, 1965. the Inspector of Buildings refused to issue+ a permit to alter this garage building to provide q an spartrant because such alteration would be in viola- Linn of the City of Salem Zcrina Ordinance, Section 2A, Paragrapha 1 and 2. On lbrch 25, 1965, Seacoast realty Co., Inc. , through their attorneys appealed to the Board to grant a variance to the application of the Zoning Ordinance. A hearing %ma held or, thin petition in the of'f'ice of the xntapetstOr of xuildia,ga on t,ay 3, 1965, pursuant to notices trnilad postpaid to the attorneys* petitioner abutters and oth+ , and advertisements published in the laal,em &vanina 37 All zbors of the Board tiara present at this hearing. Dr. Reach, L'.r. and Etre, rarchand, and utas Faunce were ro- corded in favor,.. { , After due conpidortttion thereof, the Board Yam'bare voted t=uirwDualy to uphold the decision of the Inspector of Buildings. Petition danied, no hardship involved, e�attuy iGi�<yR. fpw 3 a C fit# oftt1Ptt�sttci��zse##s RF�Nut.'�V� AIJrNL.444L{♦{ �P�NX� RECORD OF REGULARA BUSINEVVVSSI MEETING SALEM PLANNING BOARD 34 (94=4 Atreet HELD AT CHURCH STREET OFFICE, 16 JUNE 165 152dem, 4I900ar4usetts Meeting opened at 7:25 P.M. by Mr. John Gray, Jr. , Chairman. Four members were present; John Gray, Chairman Albert Pitcoff Gerald McCarthy Michael Paskowski 1. Form "A" application of Joseph L. Bourgeois, Lots 535 and 536 Cherry Hill Avenue and Valley Street, presented by Attorney John Serafini: This concerns two lots of land on Valley Street and Cherry Hill Avenue; a portion of lot #535 has been added to Lot #536 in order to increase the frontage of Lot #536 to 76 feet. Approved. Linen signed by all members present. 2. Barry D. Berkal, Att 'y. Representing Seacoast Realty Company, Inc. , appeared with Mr. Hall of the Seacoast Realty Co., Inc. Petitioner appealed to Board, under Chapter 40A, G.L. , Sec. 20, for permission of all members of the Planning Board to re- apply to Board of Appeal for hearing. This petition will be discussed at hearing to be held on July 1, 1965. 3. Minutes of three previous meetings read and approved. 4. Letter from Att'y. George Vallis, representing Salem Acres, Inc., regarding Subdivision "Witchcraft Heights" read. This concerned recommendation to City Council for approval of naming various ways on above captioned plan. 5. Copy of letter from Frank Sweeney to City Council, forwarded by vote of City Council, regarding zoning ordinance applying to "Lead Mills" area, read. This concluded business at hand. Meeting was adjourned at ap- proximately 9:15 P.M. 1 Copy to City Clerk 7/6/65 g+sw lCopto MrouroisAttty SerafBni,ge7/6 c5o e 6tv of "Salem, '�Httssarhuse##s Planning �Rvarb 34 lII4=4 5freef FORMA �ulem, Iassachuseifs APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II=B. Salem, Mass., ------- 6-----------19I`s� To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his proper in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision /Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ ---A x-- anz&-- - -- -------------- and h' ewit submita'said plan or/a determination an a orse t t P anni oard a rova under t e Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant — —`/ �.----- = --- — - ------------- --------- C � Address ------— G__- -_ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor----------- Address — ------------ -------------------------------------- Address — — 6 ` ^-� ` 4 3. Deed of property records in \ -----------------Registry Book ---5-d--6'--T--------- Page ----- — ------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _____ '_ _ . _ ____5� _ _3_ _ > __ — —mac -`---- D=- -- ---- Signature of Owner. ----- - ---' — `----r-----�- -- Address -------¢ __ 2e- - -----�— ' ------� V �/Y [OMOIL..♦ of iaxlem, Pazssa r4me##s w •,• '� . . ° Office of the (9ItU (9lexk '�O.MIM[OO 19 �11�f12[2 J, QIIAIIT2(1 June 11, 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Plass. Dear Sirs: At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber on Thursday, June 10, 1965 the Council voted to forward the enclosed communica- tion from Mr. Frank P. Sweeney to the Planning Board. Very truly yours, AJ. U EY CITY CLERK r i • 10 Sunset Road Salem, Massachusetts MAY 28 35AH '6S May 27 , 1965 CITY CL R"" OFFICE President and SALEM, MASS. City Council City Hall Salem, Massachusetts a Re: Zoning ordinance is Dear Sirs: Last night because of working later than usual, I arrived at the zoning change hearing just as the people were coming out. if on time, .I would -have spoken to the Council as follows, as I did before the Planning Board last month. I speak for myself as a taxpayer and, in agreement with all the residents of Sunset Road that I have had an ' V opportunity to contact. i, we believe that the proposed ordinance should be changed to make that area known as the "lead mills" an R-1; R-2; or R-3 District instead of the B-4 as proposed. This would not affect the present occupants, Asso- ciated Grocers, and in order to help them, we suggest that . Sec. V B 8 under "B-4 Districts" a-1 be changed-,as it would prohibit in A B-4 District any residenEB except federal housing, etc. In other words; the proposed ordinance leaves this little area what it is today, a warehouse zone, yet prohibits the owners from selling to anyone interested in residential building. The "lead mills" are the last thing one sees leaving Salem and . the first thing seen entering Salem, via Lafayette St. , one,of the few attractive entrances to the City. Why not let Associated Grocers exist as is but not allow anything but resident- to take its place if disposed of, burned down, etc. ? r Why prevent them from selling their property to a builder of either single or multi resident dwellings? - 2 - k SL the ordinance is not changed, it would appear ,. that this area will always be a "wholesale or automotive,_ district"--surely this is not what we or you people would want: Very truly yours , � 22L Frank P. Sweeney 4F, FPS/eP �. t' t �P[Yi "-j,L•"� "w`s X1-.4 �?t'i"�' _ f 4V Yc�m Y&eell �odtari 02106 June 21, 1965 MEETING NOTICE TO: The North Shore Area Transportation Coordinating Committee FROM: Mr. Francis E. Dolan, Chairman, NSATCC Mr. Lawrence Lamson, Chairman, Bd. of Selectmen, Hamilton SUBJ: Call of Next Meeting The next meeting of the North Shore Area Transportation Coordinating Committee is hereby called for: • DAY: Tuesday TIME: 8:00 P.M. DATE: June 29, 1965 PLACE: Town Hall Hamilton, Mass. Mr. James D. Fitzgerald, Associate Commissioner of the State Department of Public Works will be present to further report on the status of highway planning for the North Shore Area. This is an important meeting and we do hope that you make every effort to attend. Thank You. 4 6" GEORGE P. VALLIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 70 WASHINGTON STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744.2172 REE. 99 PLEASANT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS TELEPHONE 744-1195 June 18, 1965 Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts ATTENTION: Mr. John Gray. Chairman $E: Proposed Rezoning Plan Gentlemen: In behalf of my client, Salem Acres, Inc. , I would like to bring to your attention the fact that on the proposed zoning map for the rezoning of Salem, the Board has set aside as a B-1 area property located at the function of Valley and Middle Streets. You may recall, that at the time my client submitted the subdivision plan for "Witchcraft Heights" , we discussed a suitable location for this B-1 area and at your request I sub- mitted a plan showing my client's suggested location for the zoning of a B-1 area within the area of the subdivision. This area is shown on the subdivision plan as Lot 75, containing 214,000 square feet of land. In view of the fact that the area located at the function of Valley and Middle Streets has already been approved by your Board for a subdivision, I respectfully request that your Board re-examine this location and recommend that the B_1 area be lo- cated on Lot 75 as marked out on the subdivision plan of "Witchcraft Heights". Ver trul ur , George Vallis GPV/i,j p July 9, 1965. •a a ` George P Vallis, Esq., - 70 Washington Street, Saiem, .Massachusetts. e Dear Mr. Vallis: , . Re. - Proposed Rezoning Plan. At a meeting of the Planning Board on July`l 19651, your letter requesting a suitable location of a B-1 •area at the Salem Acres, ,Inc.,. development area, was read: The Board noted to ask if you would have your engin- ;eer superimpose this particular area over our own prelim inary zoning map. Very truly yours, x a JMG:cc Chairman . tY - MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD y'M 34 Church Street July 1, 1965• w Salem, Mass. All members were present at this meeting, which was opened at 7:25 P.M. by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. The followingis a summary of the business conducted at this meeting: Y g 1. A letter from Civil Service was read, requesting information on any person employed by the Board since letter of December 22, 1964. 2. An invitation to attend a meeting at Town Hall, Hamilton, on Tues- day, June 29, 1965 at 8:00 P.M. was read; meeting had been held two days prior to the Planning Board meeting. 3. A letter from Att 'y. George Vallis, representing Salem Acres, Inc. , was read regarding proposed Rezoning Plan. Board voted to write to Att 'y. Vallis, asking if he would have his engineer superimpose this particular area over our own preliminary zoning map, which is the City map. 4. Minutes of the last meeting, that held on June 16, 1965, read and accepted. 5. Att 'y. Philip Roy presented application Form "A" for Homidas Pelle— tier, 29 Hillside Avenue, who : expressed a desire to build. He has • lots #20, #1190 #1209 #121 Hillside Avenue and wished to add Lot #119 having a 25 ft frontage to lot #20 which has an existing dwel- ling on this lot. Mr. Sweeney made a motion the plan be endorsed, Mr. McCarthy seconded, all voted in favor, and affixed three signa- tures to linen. 6. Att 'y. Timothy Davoren presented application Form "A" for Sebastian and Marjorie Cugno, owners of property at School and North Streets, petitioning for sufficient frontage on a public way, building stand- ing on lots before subdivision control law went into effect. Mr. Sweeney made motion that plan be endorsed, Mr. McCarthy seconded, all voted in favor, linen signed. 7. Elizabeth Thibault submitted Form "A" to take a 12 ft strip of front- age at 79 Lawrnece Street, corner of Parallel Street, to add to next lot. Plan had not been filed with City Clerk; will re-submit at next meeting. 8. Arthur King, corner of Wall and Ober Streets, requested subdivision of lot containing 5700 sq ft, for variance to erect another dwelling; Board of Appeal decision on petition for variance due to hardship read. Form "A" had not been filed with the City Clerk; will return to next Planning Board meeting, July i5, 1965. lie J Y 2 - • 9. Santo Mineo, Form A. , to make four lots on Greenlawn Avenue, into one lot; had not been filed with City Clerk, no action possible at this meeting, will take the matter up at next meeting. 10. Council President John Burke asked when the Board could set up a meeting with the City Council. Board suggested dates July 12, 13, or 14. Mr. Burke will let Board know of Council's choice. 11. Councillor Peron had asked Planning Board to accept Quadrant and Patton Roads. Awaiting report from City Engineer. 12. Mr. John Barrett of the Redevelopment Authority asked permission to borrow maps from time to time as he needs them. Permission granted unanimously. 13 . Letter from Berkal & Berkal, Att 'ys. , requesting permission of all Planning Board members to all client Seacoast Realty Co., Inc., to re-apply to Board of Appeals for variance, in accordance with Gen. Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 20. Two members voted in favor, Mr. Pitco£f and Mr. McCarthy. Three members opposed, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Paskowski, and Mr. Gray. Letter to be forwarded to Berkal and Berkal to this effect, with a copy being sent to the Board of Appeal. 14. Voted to write to Salem Hospital Trustees, and North Shore Babies Hospital Trustees, regarding their proposal that the City build a new street from a point on Jefferson Avenue, opposite Ocean Avenue, across private property across Bertram Park, connecting to the hospital property somewhere in the rear of the Babies Hospital Building and the Phippen Building, approximately 1200 feet in length. Letter to state the Planning Board would not recommend building this new street for various specified reasons, one being the City would be constructing a private road for a private tax-exempt institution. 15. Vouchers and warrant sheet to process outstanding bills presented and signed by Chairman Gray. Having disposed of all business presented to the Board for this meeting, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:40 P.M. L� Clerk • _ I Q-11i#u of iafem, 'ffiassarhuse##s 34 ldh=4 I�tred �$alem, Aassttr4nortts July 7, 1965 Mrs. Christine Callahan Building Inspectorts Office 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Callahan: I received a call from Mr. Gus Toomey stating the City Council and the Planning Board will have a meeting at seven o' clock, Monday, July 12, regarding the Zoning Ordinance and Map at the Council chambers. I would appreciate if you would send out cards • to the Planning Board members notifying them of the meeting. I do not believe it will be necessary for you to attend this meeting, as we will be able to take notes if necessary. I would also request that you send notices of our regular meeting which will be held Thursday, July 15. Although July is a month with three Thursdays, I am hoping that we will not have sufficient business to have a meeting on Thursday, July 29. We can decide better at the meeting of July 15 whether or not this will be necessary. Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr. % Ctv of '*alem, tss�zrC t e##s • �' Offire of toe (Litg (Llexh to �lugus:ine J- ffiumneg CCU(glcrh P.m. 1 U.b 3 Ott Xnll July 65 1965 Mr. John M. Gray, Chairman Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: John H. Burke, President of the City Council, has called a conference of the Committee of the Whole with the Planning Board, to be held in the Council Chamber on Monday, July 121 1965 at 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of • discussing certain amendments to the proposed revision of the Zoning Ordinance. Very truly yours, AJT/hc TINE CITr CLERK Ctv of ' S$afc rt, assarh etts Office of toe CHC Oak ,o ,Augustine I Zuvtneg CHU O1 k �ioums 1 anis 3 THU�Jsll July 14, 1965 Planning Board City Hall Salem, Mass. Dear Sirs: You are cordially invited to attend a conference of the Committee of the Whole in the Council Chamber on Monday, July 19, 1965 at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of discussing further, zoning revisions to the proposed zoning ordinance and map. • Ve trulyurs A114 U06STM J CITY CLERK • MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD 34 Church Street July 15, 1965 • Salem, Mass . Meeting was opened at 7:25 P.M. by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. All of the Board members were present at this meeting. The following is a summary of the business conducted at this meeting: 1. A letter from the City Engineer, Neal Mitchell, was read regard- ing acceptance of Quadrant Road. The Board voted to notify Mr. Ray- mond L. Cummings to confer with Mr. Mitchell to ascertain his recom- mendations to bring the plans of this road and Patton Road in some form that we can act on, one way or the other. Mr. Cummings is to appear before the Board with Mr. Mitchell when he feels that these plans are in order. 2. Form "A" Elizabeth Thibault, 79 Lawrence Street, concerning transferring Lot 171-A2 with a 12-foot frontage on Parallel Street to add to adjoining lot, to allow for the construction of a garage. Approved. 3. . Form "A" Santo Mineo, Lots #152, 153, 154, 155 Brentwood Avenue, to combine all four lots making one house lot containing approximately 9528 sq. ft. Approved. 4. Form "A" Arthur King, corner of Wall and Ober Streets, to allow second dwelling on one lot. Plan endorsed, reason being approval to erect dwelling had been granted by the Board of Appeal on June 30, 1965, due to hardship cause. 5. John W. Barrett, executive director of the Salem Redevelopment Author- ity requested the Board to pay $5.19 for zoning maps which he has received from the Andrew T. Johnson Company. Voted in favor. 6. Letter from Richard 0. Johnson, attorney for Salvatore S. Reale who owns land on Day Avenue, presented and read. Mr. Reale proposes to lay a two inch water line for a distance of 375 to 400 feet in the bed of said road to bring City water service to his land. Plan of lots located on Day Avenue to be serviced by the water line also presented with letter. Voted to refer plan and letter to the City Engineer for his recommendations. 7. Mr. Gray, Chairman of the Planning Board, designated Mr. McCarthy as Planning Board representative to attend the Redevelopment Authority meetings. Mr. McCarthy accepted. This concluded business before the Board, and meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:25 P.M. • Clerk. r � , 7 PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS July 20, 1965. Mr: Augustine. J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on July 1, 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Homidas Pelletier 2. Location and Description Lot #119 Hillside Avenue to be added to Lot #20 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book Page Book Certificate #28301 Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board a p H, • ..• ��.fA'Wlxf. � i 01-13tu of YT ` 314 PN '65 Planning Potts CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 0I12=4 66ixeei FORM A Salem, LMassaxl Mrtis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., -------- June 29p -----------------19 65 _ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ __TJai_B__ijD_an___gl_d__0_ubCiksiE3 onmade._inApr11,___1959,_at__the_time the land ----------------- sv re ' storedThere ar s veral,dwel ins uq n ' ni ar 1 ag-cuairrrzrg�thgaroo age-.--Aj)pa- r i ,�35--� ---� ;5� and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. �. 1. Name of Applicant _____________HomidtasPelletier -- - - -- ---I ........29Hillside Ave. Salem, Mass. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor_______Edwin T. _Brudzynsk1 ----------------------------- Address __ _Address ------------2_60_L€X-ay_ette -t. Salem, Vass. 3. Deed of property records in ----S-Sex__UOuth- District Registry Book ________ Page _Reg-istered Land Reg. Certificate ;i 28301 la" ,' /l/ 4. Location and Description of Property: ---IeoVl20__on__plan herewith oubmi-tted- - ---- . end --------- ------- - ------ on Hillside Avenue. Containing 13,300 square fe/et. f'6 foot frontage aid _197_feet _in ng th--------------- f { G+ l /� - - Signature of Owner 29 Hiflsifle Ave, sm a,le, Mass. ��, Address -- -- — — -- --------------------------- f�.6 o/ivr.Jvcv7 ofLof'��/�-�ie..inon f3on i✓o ��G G Fi�cd �i A4 Cell of Ti y4/e �r292,a -So. -ol9�s�i y p sf�ic�o{Essex C u.�y� L onO� rn ,fO��m .Sco% /4-7 doff FS.srJill r�TBi-�.+�iyrrs�i ..sur-'✓c'ya�-- i do= y Loi2 1 � - Jill N v i b � O i ��� • � 29. E SL•s�o �• . 26'a ..� �/•. ��sr 9'x'92 f/. f►. �V/L.f7-2S�..i .. . .re.ao (4o avidc� �,ic S2.od a`. 4 9' f/orr ZSZ' /c�ntif' f�iof fh;is acfuo�Sur-vcy„✓os mode 7 fhe moa //7 c�cco�onc'e �i/�iLo� Cotri'�•/ns�`r-�Efons of�/9S9 6c/rvc�r�r/un�c /9�s y and✓une•2¢,_/9Cs c �nTi'-a. � �4w not �i�d � --- -., ��� • 5�•� P/dnni�a oor-d �'`i 11251 w --� - - - - - � 1 I I � PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS July 209 1965. Pdr: Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on July 1� 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Sebastian and Marjorie C.ugno 2. Location and Description North and School Streets sufficient frontage on public way - building standing on lots before subdivision control law went into effect 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 4375 Page 564 3197 175 Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board RE C L ? of �$alr I, 4ass djusetts 9TH'`CCy�.,g. JUL 1 12 2b PH '65 planning 19nttrb CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 Churrlj Street FORM A *Lem, '�Nassarliusrtts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ------------------------June--30..........19- 65 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- Sufficient frontage on public_way__-__build in g__stan_ding_on_-_1-0ts__b-efore subdivision control law went--into__effeet___________________________________________----------------- — — and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the SubdivisionControl Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant -------Sebastian---& Marjorie__Cugno__________ -------------------------------------------- 4100 11 Address --------------16--Dunham_RoadRoad, - -------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor...Row-in T._ Brudzinski _---_ —--------------------------- Address - - ---- - -- --------- Address - 260- Lafayette Street,_ Salem Mass. 3. Deed of property records in ________Essex South District------Registry of Deeds . Book ------4375___------- Page -----564----------------Book 3197, Page 175. 4. Location and Description of Property: ----------North_—and__SchQotAtxeeta;___Sr2lem—_------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ug �- Signature of Owner Ma -------------- . Address ____________._________16nham_Road,__Bev_erly_,__ _Mass. .F (9itg of '�$ttlem' '�Httssarljzsetts Manning 'Puttrb 34 (dhurrh Arreer $alem, ttssachuserrs July 20, 1965. Mr* Augustine Jo Toomey, City. Clerk, Salem, Massachusetts. Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on July 15, 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 10 Applicant Santo P„ Mineo • 2, Location and Description - bots #152, #153, #154, #155 on Brentwood Avenue have been combined to make one house lot, having an area of 952$+ sq ft 3. Book 5277 Page 107 Very truly yours, er _, Salem Planning Bonr 6� 4 x J �' t ? IIttlem, I �sc �zsP#ts R u r JUL 8..,. 10 "53 AM 165 1ttlmilt$ � � CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 (94urril Atreet FORM A alem, 'Massarttusetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. 65 June 24 Salem, Mass-- -------------- -----------------------------------19-------- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because s Sect. I- Sub__-division of land was recorded and now there is c�n�y ons l it -------------------------- ------------------------------------ - - ---------------------------------------------------------- (4 lots made in one) to the present owner• ----------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant ___ Sant-0 P• ---Mineo ------ - --- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------- Address 8 Greenlawn Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor___Edwin TO, Brudzynski ------- -------- Address _ 260 Lafayette Streets Salem, Massachusetts - - - - ----------- ---------- ---------------------------------- Essex South District 3. Deed of property records in ---------_-------------------------------------------------__Registry Book -----5277-----------Page -----197-------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: Lots #152, #153 i ,#154, #155 PP ly: ------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- on Brentwood Avenue$ have been combined to make one house lot# - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ - - -- ------------------------------------------------------- having an area of 952 square feet. ------- - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner o_______ ____ Gd'___�_ �✓ � • Address -------- _ _ - ¢ tea -------- ------ ,i T RECEf IItzlem ttssttt �tsE##s 1MYIYICYI �[I JUL 8, 10 s3 AM 65 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SAL34 (94=4 street FORM A �$alem, Alnssnrljuseits APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ----- ------------------19— � To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- X _____/____--ane_-l�'` __�/ _rrr �rr�__e �_ 7�_ ���Q/ 7� ' ✓� •-- and hzrewith submits said pan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. s� • 1. Name of Applicant -------- 4�i��t__ �, //?. _r°C-4_____ ------------------,-/--s-------------------------------------- Address -----( --�� a��__/l�__ t�-� '------ n �l4S3 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ------- "`'�� r • �/%i+' _ rr.4 P----------____________________________ Address ----- , -�`------ ------------- ------------------------ 3. Deed of property records in ( ` !L. _ � e -------------Registry - --------- .77 Book �� — Page � ' - -�0-/--- 11 ' /!J Cord- 4. Location and Description of Property: h0W'v _ 9.7__�_7_!�1ei �._______ _ --------------------------- Cr�e�r�__ __✓_/��±o��us_ �i /�r�i�=r__--®�_���2'_�oaGf✓es,__�.��on.�i3c��Lo.�_�_v__�if ---�ira��----- f — - ---------- ----- ,----_�a' --------- --_F---- �- ____�o__-----------° _7 -----------------------_/�----- ----_---- Signature of Owner - _____ p____--1_______________ • Address — �' — -- ---4_Q�r--�- P _ _ h Q Z. " `�� =-s'•� f" gip, 0 3i PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS July 20, 1965 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey Y . City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on July 15, 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Elizabeth Thibault 2. Location and Description Lot #171A2 Parallel Street, to be added to Lot #171A1 Lawrence Street, corner of Parallel Street 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 2684 Page 312 Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board Ctu of ttlem, assachuutts Q � PIttnniq Pnttrb ars t+, 34 (114=4 Atreet !o es eFORM A Salem, 'Massachusetts s N APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT tV qC OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL j' -J-j File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy �.-.C" C.)Q >-`n with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ----------------,jUly---619.6_5- 9_____ - - _- _____ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivisionwithin the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ --said---LaL-(rants--on-a---Aubli-G-zea-y--acCegted--bY-the--City--- f--Salem----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I 1. Name of Applicant ---F7. b3tk1---WMabill.------------------------- - - -------------------------------------------- Address ----------- 9--I#&Wj°IIt1&9--:3tX -------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ----EdI1-- ->-- rud- .3[Y k -------------------------------------------------------- Address ---------------------------2bD--Lafayette-,.._-Street,,__Sa1em - 3. Deed of property records in _Ezs _,South__Dj_sj,r1Lg_t.__________-_Registry Book ----26)31--------------- Page ---312------------------ 4. Location and Description of Property:------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ________-Snuthwasterlyr__by___ )_fee_t;__Northwastarly by Lot #171A1 fifty (50) feet; Northeasterly by land now or o ---frm&rly -0--dean --Raymond--twenty-tvuo--{ th�ast�rl3R--by land now or formerly of Girard Dube twenty-five (25) feet; South ---_wasterly-by__said--land-_of_Duba_tan__11Il)._ £ea-ty--ane1.__Southeaater_Ly-by said land of Dube twenty-five (25) feet, Heim Lot '#171A2, --------------------- -- - --- Signature of Owner --- {__ _ ___ _ ______ Address --7-9-LaversnCa__3treeL,---Sa-len---------------------------- • p� of �$ttlem, ttss�ztl tse##s • Planning poarn July 200 1965. 34 (9h=O $trnt �aI¢m,3�aSSttL1�nSYSSS Mr. Augustine J« Toomey, City Clerk, Salem, Ntassachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem, held on July 15; 1965, it was Voted:-To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan: 1 Applicant - Arthur F., Ding 2o Location and Description - 7 Wall Street, corner of Ober street, erect second single gamily dwelling. • 30 Book 5061 Page 286 (Reason for endorsing this plan is because of prior approval of the Board of Appeals, dated June 30, 1965e due to hardship cause). Very truly yours, er , Salem PlaFning Boarat s �A Q-11itV Of �P o ttssttc ltSP#ts Yf O, JUL I idald&?H�glarb • ago C3 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SAIEMMASS. O a, O W W 34 @Ih=4 Street C30 FORMA �ttlem, ttssttcllusetts 1 N w �_ APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT w OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL v File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., --------"�_U__/ --------/ _------__19---lo__J To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within thhe,meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ lfs?v ¢'------5 -r-c--e-Z------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant -- - — -- — • Address --------- ------- �z� — -- — —— 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor o�Al�x!2__1e�X_1�1Ti/_CJ_S !_____________________________..__ Address �t------1--_;2_7 :_a' _c�_ff-----------.Sf_ 3. Deed of property records in --------.-o--.------------------------------------—--------Registry Book ------- ------ Page -------v;2Z_6---------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -----Oor.__.__�]�s41�_ _______Qil'x'p______Ss______S � -F- -----�/-------f�/-/-------- ----�-b-- --,---------------------- -=VfS/d �1_eX �f -------------------------------------------------------- -----012—r__fie-4/----------.�/-------�s�i Signature of Owner _-__ _ ___ _ �D Address ----------- ---------- • i I' SALEM • REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TOWN HALL F. O. BOX 369 A SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 0I971 TELEPHONE 7//-6900 FRANKLIN A. HEBARD CHAIRMAN FELIX KU LIK VICE-CHAIRMAN CHANNING BACALL. JR. TREASURER July 13, 1965 FRANCIS J. GRAY ASSISTANT TREASURER FRANCIS H. McGRATH JOHN W. BARRETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. John M. Gray, Chairman Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: In a recent conversation with you I discussed the fact that we received a bill from the Andrew T. Johnson Company for $5.19 for purchase of City of Salem zoning maps. Although we do have federal funds for renewal purposes, we are not allowed to spend these funds for zoning maps. The reason for requested submission from your office was to, in a small way, be of assistance to the Planning Board to show the zoning maps to people who came to this office thinking we also served as a planning board. At the time prior to the hearing I had no map available from which to discuss these zoning changes intelligently. Hoping you can see your way clear to accepting this bill, I am Sincerely yours, n W. Barrett, Executive Director JWB:ec Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEETING JULY 15, 1965: VOTED TO PAY BILL. . F / July 9, 1965, . Berkal and fBerkal, Attys., • • 70 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. Gentlemen: Re - Petition' for Permission to Re-Appeal to the Board of Appeal. At a ,meeting of, the Planning Board on July 1, 1965, your petition for permission to re-apply to the Board of Appeal, on behalf of the Seacoast Realty Co , Inc., was read. Two members voted in favor, Mr. Pitcoff and Mr. Mc., Carthy. Three members opposed,. Mr. Sweeney, Mr# Paskow- ski, and Mr. Gray. Very truly yours, 4 . JMG.cC , Copy: Board of Appeal Chairman 4 - a July 23, 1969 Re: Zoning Ordinance Mr, Augustus Toomey City Clerk City Hall 83 Washington Street Salemp Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: As a reminder to your there are a few places in the Zoning Ordinance which dates will have to be inserted after the Zoning Ordinance is adopted. These insertions are in Section III — B — Zoning Map, Section X — Para. 1# and Section XL — Para. D. I trust you will make these insertions at the present time. I hope you will also tell me when you wish to sign the Zoning Map so that I can bring the tracings down to you, after which I can get some prints of the same for your use and the use of the other departments. Very truly yoursp John M. Grays Jr. JMGJ/jm 169N M. GRAY CO. - ARCHITECTS - 153 MILK STREET, BOSTON MASS. 02109 TRANSMITTAL OF DRAWINGS RECORD • DateJuly28, 1965 PROJECT: Salem Planning Board TO: Mrs. Christine Callahan — Building Inspector' s Office — City Hall Salem, Mass. Weare returning herewith ❑ approved, as noted {l13under separate cover ❑ return after correction ❑ herewith ❑ progress prints 13f We are sending _ order separate cover ❑ for use on job ❑ NO. OF DRAWING DATE OF PRINTS NUMBER DRAWING DESCRIPTION - CONTRACTOR Pnclnsad is a capgE of let+ar cant +n Mr. Augustine Toomey — Please file it as a copy, JOHN M. GRAY CO. By John rw (� July 90 1965. Trustees of the Salem Hospital,, ` and North Shore Babies Hospital, ' Salem Hospital, 81 Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, Gentlemen:. After careful consideration and investigation, the Salem Planning Board regrets to inform your combined boards that they will not recom-. ment to the City officials that a new street be built from Jefferson Avenue to the southerly side of the hospital property in a manner-.that your Board requested« F' As requested by the Trustees•'of both hospitals, the City would build a new street from a point -on Jefferson Avenue'opposite Ocean Avenue ro across; rivate • p p pert y,, across Bertram-Park connecting to the hospital property somewhere in the rear of the Babies Hospital Building and the Phippen Building, a distance of approximately 1,200 feet, The Planning Board has held several conferences with the City�Eng— ineer from which the following facts and estimated costs,were established: 1.• —Land Taking and Easements 20,000.00 , 2« Culvert for Brook 2,500.00 • . ; 36 Twelve inch Water Main'including trenching and excavation - _ 21,500.00 4. Storm Drainage System 50000.00 5+ . Sanitary Sewerage System 6,000.00 6 Forty foot bituminous concretepaved- road with ' twenty foot construction easements 96,0000_00 . 0 . , 7. Extraordinary Foundation - Swamps and ledge, etc. $200000000 $,' - Borings 3,000.00 •t 914 Engineering Costs _ 6.000,00 Y $1800000.00 From the following facts and other studies it appears that the City would have little to gain and much to lose on an expenditure, ' of $180,000.00 as l; The City would be constructing a prvate •road for a. . private tax-exempt institutions 29It is our feeling that whereas your body emphasizes that the hospital is not now a"local 'hospital but a hospital' used by othercommunities that if such a private roadway, is to be constructed', these communities should share in .the cost. 3. The road would not -to an extent relieve traffic on High— land Avenue, and certainly not on Jefferson Avenue. ` ' The Master Plan of '3alem`has already made some studies on Jefferson Avenue relative to a major artery use. 4. The road would practically bisect Bertram Park, land that is being considered as a prospective school site, land that the City badly. needs., . , 5 The Trustees'. or your Boardp stated that your architects wish to connect-a 12" water service to Jefferson Avenue. Our City Engineer said that there is little likelihood, particularly where there are two water mains on Highland Avenue, that there would be any_ loss of pressure from, (� ) services at one timee .In fact, one of the reasons that the Gallows Hill standpipe was so located was to provide relief for �the hospitals. He also feels that if the hospital, architects feel that additional water facil— ities including pressure- are needed, •that a standpipe., should be constructed on the hospital grounds, as do other - a,jor inatutitionss It was brought out that a circumferential type of roadway would be f,.built within the hospital, property connecting and '.servicing all of the buildings, both existing and future. The Planning Board feels that_if this road is properly planned, the exact entrance to it would not make any great difference where it connected to a City street.' The design -of the roadway within the hospital property, we would recommend should be carefully studied. Summing up, the Planning Board feels that the hospital authorities should considers rear entrance off Wilson Road, more or less opposite the entrance ,to the Salem Municipal Golf Course. The access at. this .par w ticular point would still be by the way of coming down Jefferson Avenue as it would be for the entrance opposite Ocean Avenue. By cutting through the tip' of. Bertram Park,,.which is more or less the width of a normal City street, the City would perhaps be able to • gain an access to the prospective school site through this general area. The Planning Board wishes to make known to the Trustees that they are always willing"and ready to sit down with them and listen to any alternate request for an access on the southerly side of the hospital. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Chairman - 10 gi#v of ttlem, �zssttt �zse##s 9 b, "FS E Planning Poaril July 9, 1965. 9`G'L �alem, 'MttssttdjusetTs Trustees of the Salem Hospital, and North Shore Babies Hospital, Salem Hospital, $1 Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts. Gentlemen: After careful consideration and investigation, the Salem Planning Board regrets to inform your combined boards that they will not recom- mend to the City officials that a new street be built from Jefferson Avenue to the southerly side of the hospital property in a manner that your Board requested. • As requested by the Trustees of both hospitals, the City would build a new street from a point on Jefferson Avenue opposite Ocean Avenue across private property, across Bertram Park connecting to the hospital property somewhere in the rear of the Babies Hospital Building and the Phippen Building, a distance of approximately 1,200 feet. The Planning Board has held several conferences with the City Eng- ineer from which the following facts and estimated costs were established: 1. Land Taking and Easements $ 209000.00 2. Culvert for brook 2, 500.00 3 . Twelve inch Water Main including trenching and excavation 219500.00 4. Storm Drainage System 5,000.00 5. Sanitary Sewerage System 69000.00 6. Forty foot bituminous concrete paved road with twenty foot construction easements 96,000.00 f S 2 - • 7. Extraordinary Foundation - Swamps and $20,000.00 Ledge, etc. , 8. Borings 3,000.00 9. Engineering Costs 62000.00 $1809000.00 From the following facts and other studies it appears that the City would have little to gain and much to lose on an expenditure of $180,000.00 as : 1. The City would be constructing a private road for a private tax-exempt institution. 2. It is our feeling that whereas your body emphasizes that the hospital is not now a "local" hospital but a hospital used by other communities that if such a private roadway is to be constructed, these communities should share in the cost. • 3. The road would not to any extent relieve traffic on High- land Avenue, and certainly not on Jefferson Avenue. 4.. The Master Plan of Salem has already made some studies on Jefferson Avenue relative to a major artery use. The road would practically bisect Bertram Park, land that is being considered as a prospective school site, land that the City badly needs. 5. The Trustees; or your Board, stated that your architects wish to connect a 12" water service to Jefferson Avenue# Our City -Engineer said that there is little likelihood, particularly where there are two/water mains on Highland Avenue, that there would be any loss of pressure from the main services at one time. In fact, one of the reasons that the Gallows Hill standpipe was so located was to pro- vide relief for the hospital. He also feels that if the hospital architects feel that additional water facilities including pressure are needed, that a standpipe should be constructed on the hospital grounds, as do other major institutions. a • 3 It was brought out that a circumferential type of roadway would be built within the hospital property connecting and servicing all of the buildings, both existing and future. The Planning Board feels that if this road is properly planned, the exact entrance to it would not make any great difference where it connected to a City street. The design of the roadway within the hospital property, we would rec- ommend should be carefully studied. Summing up, the Planning Board feels that the hospital authorities should consider a rear entrance off Wilson Road, more or less opposite the entrance to the Salem Muncipal Golf Course. The access at this particular point would still be by the way of coming down Jefferson • Avenue as it would be, for_the entrance opposite Ocean Avenue. By cutting through the tip of Bertram Park, which is more or less the width of a normal City Street, the City would perhaps be able to gain an access to the prospective school site through this general area. The Planning Board wishes to make known to the Trustees that they are always willing and ready to sit down with them and listen to any alternate request for an access on the southerly side of the hospital. Very truly yours, JMG:cc Copy to: Mayor Collins Chairman. City Engineer Mitchell • Building Inspector O'Brien SALEM PLANNING BOARD 34 CHURCH STREET • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS June 18, 1965 Re: Proposed Roadway from Jefferson Avenue to the rear of the hospital property Trustees of the Salem Hospital and North Shore Babies Hospital Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: After careful consideration and investigation, the Salem Planning Board regrets to inform your combined boards that they will not recommend to the city officials that a new street be built from Jefferson Avenue to the southerly side of the hospital property in a manner that your Board requested. As requested by the Trustees of both hospitals, the city would build a new street from a point on Jefferson Avenue opposite Ocean Avenue across private property, across Bertram Park connecting to the hospital property somewhere in the rear of the Babies Hospital Building and the Qoppbren Building, a distance of approxi— mately 19290 feet. The Planning Board has held several conferences with the City Engineer from which the following facts and estimated costs were established: 1. Land Taking and Easements $ 20,000.00 2. Culvert for Brook 2,500.00 3. Twelve inch Water Main including trenching and excavation 219500.00 4. Storm Drainage System 5,000.00 5. Sanitary Sewerage System 6,000.00 6. Fourty foot bituminous concrete paved road with twenty foot construction easements: 96,000.00 7. Extraordinary Foundation — Swamps and ledge, etc. 20,000.00 $1711000.00 Trustees of the SalemHospital'; -2- June 18, 1965 • $ 171,000.00 8. Borings 3,000.00 9. Engineering Costs 6,000.00 $ 180,000.00 From the following facts and other studies it appears that the city would have little to gain and much to lose on an expenditure of $180,000.00, as: 1. The city would be constructing a private road for a private tax-exempt institution. 2. It is our feeling that whereas your body emphasizes that the hospital bG4 CQL V. is not now a e r)*" hospital but a hospital used by other communi- ties that if such a private roadway is to be constructedrblvt these communities should share in the cost. 3. The road would not to any extent relieve traffic on Highland Avenue, • and certainly not on Jefferson Avenue. 4. The road would practically bisect Bertram Park, land that is being considered as a prospective school site, land that the city badly needs. 5. The Trustees or your Board stated that your architects wish to connect a 12" water service to Jefferson Avenue. Our City Engineer said that there is little likelihood, particularly where there are two water mains ha¢ on Hi hand Avenue,r there would be any loss of pressure from I�YP services' In fact, one of the reasons that the Gallows Hill $0 standpipe wasilocated was to provide relief for the hospital. He also feels that if the hospital architects feel that additional water facilities including pressure are needed, that //a standpipe should be do . constructed on the hospital grounds tjmtWom as other major institutions. TNS d�A(r6„rp ��d�Fr a� �dt� �*Yf �C.,A��O,y ♦t�a�l��, Tv M4 re ee—i "' o Ao V/4 #,cA 4.e f*40 .frooc 7-0 4 41 't / Qn I2OF-Cn )� ufc , - '"� � J � �� /% �k� �/ -- ;- • r Trustees of the Salem Hospital —3— June 18, 1965 • It was brought out that a circumferential type of roadway would be built within the hospital property connecting and servicing all of the build ngs, both existing and future. The Planning Board feels that if this road is properly planned, the exact entrance to it would not make any great difference where it ! •f cep rMsY connected to a city street. The design of the roadway witk the hospital property, rMOU1 0 Sru ooQo, we would recommend It 1& be carefully . Summing up, the Planning Board feels that the hospital authorities should =CO,b a rear entrance off Wilson Road, more or less opposite the entrance to the Salem (it frrc.c. Municipal Golf Course. The access to this particular point would be av rNg Geatt 04L ..same coming down Jefferson Avenue as it would be for the entrance opposite Ocean Ave. By cutting through the tip of Bertram Park, which is more or less the width of a normal city street, the city would perhaps be able to gain an access to • the prospective school site through this general area. The Planning Board wishes to make known to the Trustees that they are always willing and ready to sit down with them and listen to any alternate request for an access on the southerly side of the hospital. Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr JMGJ/jm • HIGHLAND PARK 1 Por'+'CCR ------ LANG _. \�tk \ 1 ------------ i. \ � • qq CSI �� �\ - d`` 1 ,•�'\\\�1 ..�•• �. •� - n _ ` Yom'-�T<Fy c ti _ 1 Ab /`/ / p -T �= \ 64\ 1 PJ l R I Ef4E / 1 C T / I C / i / / I SALEM HOSPITAL ( � i BERTRAN FIELD \\ I Y. I I � I NORTH SHORE BABES I y I I ®v SALEM HOSPITAL I HIGHLAND PV E N U E � It n �. _ rn 3 SALEM H() SPiTAI. i I JE I pJ E� H � 50 EP �E ff I� i t I I i I 1 1 Nil I Q' I I BERTRAM FIELD r - y = _ NORTH SNORE BABIES w u� SALEM HOSPITAL I 1 h ' HIGHLAND AVENUE MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD 34 Church Street Salem, Mass . • August 5, 1965 Meeting opened at 7:30 P-M- Mr. John M. Gray, Chairman, who was unable to be present, had requested that Mr. Pitcoff serve as acting chairman. Members present besides Mr. Pitcoff were Gerald McCarthy, Michael Pas- kowski, and Raymond Sweeney. Minutes of last meeting, held July 15, 1965, were read and accepted. 1. The first order of business was a questionnaire from the Common- wealth of Massachusetts, requesting information on members and the operation of the Planning Board. Mr. Pitcoff will undertake to draft the answers to this questionnaire. 2. A letter was received from Civil Service regarding a letter of theirs dated June 29, 1965, to which they claimed they had not received a reply. The Board voted to send a duplicate copy of our reply which was dated July $, 1965. 3. A letter from the City Engineer, Neal B. Mitchell, in response to a letter from the Planning Board for his recommendations on the application of Salvatore Reale for approval of a proposed 2" water line, having a distance of 375 to 400 feet, in the bed of Day Avenue. It was voted to send a copy of Mr. Mitchell's letter to Richard 0. Johnson, attorney for Mr. Reale, together with a letter from the Planning Board stating there is no objection to his plan by the Board, if all the recommendations are complied with. 4. A Mr. Gauthier appeared to question the location of the business area adjacent to his property on Lafayette Street, which would be a location on which a gas station and an insurance agency are sit- uated, adjacent to and at the corner of Palmer Street. The Board discussed this subject thoroughly with Mr. Gauthier. 5. A communication from the City Clerk was read. This letter was ac- companied by an order from the City Council, dated July 22, 1965, referring to the Planning Board for its recommendations, the accept- ance plan of Calabrese Street . On motion of Mr. Sweeney, seconded by Mr. McCarthy, it was voted to : refer the order and plan to the City Engineer for his recommendations and suggestions, asking him to inform the Planning Board of his suggestions at the earliest opportunity. 6. Form "A", endorsement of plan believed not to require approval, of Elmer H. Warner of 10 Salt Wall Lane, proposing to transfer a strip of land 3 ' x 50' at the rear of 12 Albion Street to 21 Nichols Street property. Voted to endorse. Having attended to all of the business brought before it for this meeting, the Board voted to adjourn at approximately 9:30 P.M. Tito of gassar4use##s • ' �� (Office of toe (fi#g Clerk 19 �ugn9tine 7J- ffiuvmeg Q[itg QIlerk gllnum. 1 nnb 3 (9itu X.11 Augast 3,3, 1965. Planning Board City Ball Salem, Mass. Dear Sirs: There will be a conference of the Committee of the Whole with the Planning Board in the Council Chamber an Tuesday, August 17, 1965 at 7:00 P.M. relative to the linen of the first changes in the zoning map. • Very truly yours, AU IRE tBY CITY CLERK • f t6— • PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a mee na,,qq� he Planning Board of the City of Salem held on AuguB , g!`1n it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Elmer Ho Warner 10 Salt Wall Lane, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description 12 Albion Street, applicant wishes to deed 3' x 500 strip at rear of property to 21 Nichols Street property. 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry 125 Book 4703 Page Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board `` t Planning Pnttrb 34 Thurrll Street FORM A Salem, 'Massarflusetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. J p Salem, Mass., ------------!2ZtiLfk__A_)______19@_J__ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because-(see Sect. II-A) ___ ti ------- - _ >-_ ----------- - ---------- and herewith/submits.said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not ruired. 1. Name of Applicant - -------- G d�ss �1__--d -✓�/�_��2��2iY ill__----------------------- ------ • Address -------- 1 2. Name of Engineer or Strive or______, �G_dd f ✓__/S_� td.- L _ ---------------------------- Address ___________C____"n � --- ------ - ----------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ___ K _&4_0'11_2C/____Registry Book ---*-742-3---------- Page --- 1 4. Lobation and Description of Property: __ ________ /u LUQ .1140 Y -- Wv LU ut W; CV %� �w i J J i Y O UQ �- Signature of Owner _ � 1 � _ Address ------- � �-- -- ----- - - - ���--:---"-�-�Y--�-- - - �iiU�dcoiza� Uiivs,G Juice C �� alfon 02133 John B. Hooper, Chairman July 23, 1965 Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: I cannot find that any reply has been received to my letter of June 29, 1965 which I am quoting below: "Will you kindly advise if anyone has been employed in the Planning Board since your letter of December 22, 1964. If so please state the names and in what capacity employed." Will you kindly forward the requested information at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, W. HENRY FINNEGAN DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SERVICE By (Miss) Helen M. Pelley Head of Pay Roll Bureau HMP:NC C.8.6.65 64-9347 August 10, 1965 : Called Miss Pelley. This letter shouldA: 29pt"been sent out. Our letter of July 8, 1965 had been received on July 139 but due to confusion of vacations, had not been filed with previous correspondence. Everything is now in order, disregard this letter. Py t. July S, 1965 Finnegans W, Henry �'inns , 3 Director of Civil Service, ` State House, ;.. ' Boston, Mass, Atten Miss Helen M. Pelley. Dear Miss Pelley: In reply to your letter asking if anyone hadbeen employedby: the Planting Board sine® December 220, 19649 . the OlGrady.,Typing Service performed ,the clerical du- 'ties of the Board until April 2, '1965, having assumed these duties January ?, 1965 - Mrs, Christine -Callahan is handling this work at r the Present 'time, having for- Board on Ju ne4 16 1965 k - Very truly yours, JMG:cc chairman : . - € Y. a .. • - f - - <. ee Wm, WM&ow 44. 02133 June 29, 1965 John B. Hooper, Chairman Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: Will you kindly advise if anyone has been employed in the Planning Board since your letter of December 22, 1964. If so please state the names and in what capacity employed. Very truly yours, W. HENRY FINNEGAN DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SERVICE (Miss) Helen M. Pelley Head of Pay Roll Bureau HMP:MLM ' 0.7.13.65 64-9347 • July 80 1965 .r W. Henry Finnegan, Director of Civil' Service, State House; Boston, Mass. Atten; Miss Helen 'M: Pelley. Dear Miss PelleyrA ; U reply to your, letter' asking if anyonathad been employed by the Planning Board since December 220 1964, the O'Grady `Typing Service performed the clerical dui ties of the Board :until April 29 1965, having assumed , these duties January .7, 1965, Mrs« Christine Callahan is handling this work at the present time, having started for the Board on June l6, 1965• Very truly yours, ' JMGacc Chairman - % . • i i August 10,. 1965. e ' Raymond L Cummings, Edq., 74'Washington Street', . _ Salem, Yessachueetts« DearMr.' Cummingsl Re:-Acceptance of Quadrant Road Acceptance of Patton Road At a meeting of then"Plaming Board held on July 159 1965, a letter from the City Engineer, Pro deal B. Mitch- all was read. We are enclosing a copy of that letter. The Board voted ,at this meeting to ask you to confer with Mr. Mitchell on what must be done to bring the plans 'of these roads in some form. that we can act on one way or the other#,, When you feel that you have complied with whatever, r� recommendations Mr,. Pitchell suggests, ..please notify us L so that you may appear before the Board with Mr. Mitchello Very truly yours* CS A G PL ��»eC • TY N1VIN BOARD Copy to City Engineer EnCI'r, 1 - Y r 4 e 4 cowry fff#g of S; ttlem, 'fflttssac4usette n 3TT �Bapttrfmant of ?Public marks i ��GQDNE NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER July 8,1965. Planning Board 34 Chur¢h Street Salem, Mass. Re: Acceptance of a portion of Quadrant Road. Gentlemen: Referring to the plan entitled "Street Acceptance PlanQuadrant Rd. , Hort: Scale 1t1 = 40, Vert: Scale ll' = 4f Dec. 3,19,4, Osborn Palmer, Inc. 15 Wallis Street Peabody" , attention is called to the fact thai the finished grace at the .high portion is too flat for Proper drainage. Also, the sewer is located too near to the street line, making an easement through lots 15 and 13A necessary in order to repair or relay that portion of the sewer. The approximate location of the water main is not good enough, and we need to know the location of the water service lines to the buildings together with their curb stops. The road is not graded properly and sidewalks have not been con- structed. walks and driveways on the lots have been constructed but the plans do not show their location, nor do they show the grade to which they were constructed. Bound stones have been set. In my opinion, neither the plan nor the road is ready for accep- tance at this time. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer 15 Form C-10 6Z40M CIT V `BOE SALEM In City Council, 19 r Ordered: Let (va In City CouncilMav 1 ,_ 9 '.- — Ref. to Planning Bd. Adopted. ATTEST: AU INE J. C Gq -- --_`- ------------ N A_ 0 Ctv of cll�balem, ttgstzcl#uge##s tepartment of Public Wurks NEAL B. MITCHELL Y - 'IT' FNCIN... ,fuly ;,1965• Planning !,card 34 Churuh Street -Salem, Mass. Re: Acceptance of a portion of Quadrant Road . Gentlemen: Referring to the plan entitled "Street Acceptance Plan Quadrant Rd . Hort: Scale 1" = 40' Vert: Scale 1" = 41 , Dec. 3,19b1F7 Osborn Palmer , Inc . , 15 ',4allis SAreet Peabody" , attention is called to the fact that the finished grade at ti-le high portion is too flat for proper drainage. J'.Lso, the sewer is located too near to the street line, making an easement through lots 15 and 13A necessary in order to repair or relay that portion of the sewer . The approximate location of the water main is not good enough, and we need to know the 1:,cation of the water service lines to the buildings together with their curb stops . The road is not graded properly and sidewalks have not been con- structed. V�alks and drive�,r.:tys on the lots have been constructed but the plans do not show their location, nor do they sktoer the grade to which they were constructed. Bound stones have been set. In my opinion, neither the plan nor the road is ready for accep- tance at this time. Very truly ,yours , Neal B. :litchell City Engineer !II -.I .. I I 1 I. f II I �: ' VIII( ' ,". l II II I I I a f l *rr I. ,,�i r t +{ STI 1 , i �... I 1 , : �,. r /.. � • ,: k � I� .� I �., 1 -. 1 : 1 �C� fr t� . k ?' , . O � f^J.. ' .. .'1 . � !. _�: .11. I _ I. ,i •ll IIi I - i ,' , � � I .I �. } ','I if i 1I .._ • . , � � � � .I f r ' i1 I I ,' Il ll t 7 � I I 1. , { IIII1IIj 1 { t /, i\V •,.. •., v ;, ,il_ t t �I t 1 1 , I'I 1 ,. 1� �I � � , � I I S � -tic � -:• �- � G 111 � I I I.IIl. �t . 1•0 .o. , . r o J� ,.0 1 11 11 � ! 1C � �I S 0 . � . �6 'I I II 1. 1; I � I I:: .I f .. li j•r !'I I ;. I i. I I ,; I �,� I 'i I � . I I ,. I �� � '. p � � .I'I__, I •i. 1�1 � II! � �i 1 I� I . � II � ; - I ; I �.. .. � , � I f: r jf � i Ili r� fli �I � � I K . �� . •.- ` .. •,�t ?:r I! f < . fn N -�' ., : � � /- •,. ,. fu. �. V � ;1. __. I:I' I 1 :I l,_ i I )... I 'ai � I I I I 1 I „ ! I , , ' I I : I I I. ,1 :�, :I.� ,I (II' :' jl II I' ! II I 1: Ifii� ,I ! I CI. LI � � r..- , ,• i.. . r 7 I Y 'i 1 I "1 rY f � ' i , .: r r �, t �I} is IJ C ,.7I �• .I U J. 1I, II { , .. -., (J' _C 11 I Ili Ir :1 I,I• I 1 I' � . I �: � I � , ' I „ ':,� I. ,'I t � I � 1 � I"�' ,.. ,': it II 1 ` � �~ -7 \ c+ 'r Z _ � :: !:' :, !. !:; 1�1 i I .i a II I I � �., C ,t I,1. I : '•: I ..,, I'„ I I I I I� I ,1,1 I.. II I '.y I' II :I' }� tl1 G. III.,! ,.I I I IL.I s � ,.1, .. .. ,, ,I �" .1 {t .IT f. " ,-. . 1 . : I, , i' -:; ;�} ',• ,T: tl JI1 ,. fil : k„ rn .' :. i f { . I hl �" '.I' �i .:._i , + � � N A � � I s I'I' ! 1' I :I :1 Irl :i, il!I LI I , I I I '' .I II ! . ill, !; 1 II :': I, I I , � ?. II I,1. -}rh' hl {' r t I- li- , ” I. i. -r, t 1 {: r t• ;. !-I 'r�r i-' ; 1. , . .I ,t a,•� .{ ,... . ,... .� .,1, :C-� • `,o- �. .. w I'.. ' I:i !Ili ; 1 I, i.. , L, :�� f " I. I' l I i �I: �� , ' .. . :! n. IIII 1` ' li I I I p � � I I � I } LU , I : . I I - , 1 � , :� . I '- I I. ' ' I' ' I II 11 ,I , � I I I 11 :�• .qf ,: ' ,�, Q � Q ! I I ? I .L-1� .: � i 1 '.C! ...: II ,..I..fi.� _ ...,i .... :. li I, 1'I I i . 1 .. •. it I I , (A � � i! T I T.. l I � � -, y # ;r .} , 1� f t1 { n- rj .:-I-I t., II I _ 1 1 ' .� -•�.. V � I / u) :,.. : IC . Mj. s _ _ .� o . 11.11. Il� 1 1' , ; 1 I fr1 .I I � lfi 1,1, :1f 1: •ji 7 :1 I l I O '1 ' _ 11 45 C ,t W f ., ! . I1. C� . . II Y i II t • I I. 1, 1i ! :-� j � i I Ch 1 j (�• � -� I / 2 � f t : 1rIT y, t it �' I II ' rl . I , .. 1 IIIw"i I: I, �:,� r: L. .. � '1. ! .. J ..�1.I. I l � J. RR,, �J ' 1 V� �\ .• N _ ! - LII l!I { 1r1, I ;} I . 'r : ! ! , � I II I .:' I �..1.;. .,, i �' L ��` I.If : I: t id ,#'` I ' ,.... J t -rl 9, I ,, /. r �/ k• '` J• \O I� I I 1, I I!I I � , 1 I I I •. , � I I. ,I :} • I: � I. l; 1 I ,; 1 1' 1t .LI .. 1 . .. - _ I. E I k 1 ;' 1 �'. h 1, ITf 1 t 11 1 1 i r I f 1 tl. I r I lY f k4 • . 0 t�2,, .. '- `� '' : - it I II h ' I �:+ :;.1 I "� J. 1 }.� 71 � ' II I T'. ' \:Ifl I I I � I ; , .:: .�� � � - �„� I'll ' ►^ Di e II l ! 1 't II, L.., LF1L firy-l. :11 . 11 II ij�r n. , I1. a 4l: 1 �� I '':t ll . i:! :ill Ii1 i11 11 �� 1 I: ,. � O ,(( 1.:111 . ill ul .1a al I I ., ; ,. tlllll , tl Pk! � � � �i;l , I i I L • ,I ;1., ,.t ... ..__ :A+ ,I. .. ..;,;a. + 'r-: . a, I. :r:..J F,. ..� ..y„ ! J .I:I +.. ...•. �, i I b ,I I'' 1,• ,I :! r T •: I T E 11. L :: r Ii I }} r.. , 111, 1 1 11 � 111 I r41 � I I it _ � ' 1 �' • � G _ I ;, I ,II 1 1 Il � •.I : :I _I_ �� � 1 1 1 ,1 11 � l�� , . : 1 � I I ;. , I :: II 1 I 111 yy.��1. 1 T Ii II r l,. 1. t I,.L.1 71. •� ,I , TT - �..1 . . I ! til I t l a + r, 11 �I' r�� ill 1 ui{- 'r � ,:. .: { I 1 i,1 1 i� ll: I I - 1_ I 1i 1 ,. O 11 II,I � I IIIIt 1 . i1... ji II �1 1 j I� I . . ,:� -I-,h+ -�,: �r,. 1- 1' I 1- t d�5 I � .. :k I I � 1 : .1 ,I I � , •*-L . l_ P'. + �1. _ ; 1, � :}. �'' II �� � 1: � _1 {, �I,, :Yf'• I � .f Irl � I ''� r-. �.LC IIi li II II I I I. I I I 1 1 ' I h � 1 I 1 1 IIII I! I I, 1 1:11 , L..iL � J ,NOTARY PUBLIC :�'�,.611 - TELEPHONE 748-2870 r. t. "E RICHARD O. JOHNSON • Attorney at dnnaw 10 COLONIAL ROAD SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS July 12, 1965 John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman of Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street, Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray, . I represent Salvatore S. Reale of 45 Lawrence Street, Salem, Massachusetts, who owns real estate on Day Avenue, Salem. Mr. Reale proposes to lay a two (2) inch water line for a distance of 375 to 400 feet in the bed of said road in order to bring City water service to his land. I am forwarding, attached hereto, a plan of_ the lots in question to be serviced-by the water line and its proposed location in Day Avenue . ' • After consideration by your Board in conjunction with the City Engineer, I ask that you kindly furnish us with the necessary letters of approval for the installation of this service. Respectfully submitted, i ROJ/a Enclosure i s • July 23, 1965. Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, City Hall, .Salem, Massachusetts. Dear Mr4 Mitchell: We are enclosing a letter from Richard 0 Johnson, attorney representing Salvatore S. Reale who owns real estate on Day Avenue.. Mr. Reale;-proposes to lay a two , Off (2) inch water line for a distance of 375 to 400 feet in the bed of said road ,in order to bring City water service to his land. At a meeting of the Planning Board on July 15, 1965, it was ,voted to, refer this letter-with the accompanying plan to .you for your advice.. • We would appreciate your forwarding your recommenda- tions on this proposal to us in time for our next meeting, which will be held on August 5, 1.965.. Very truly yours, dMC.cc 0iJ,r7 �U n Enclosures Chairman !c� 3 �i#g of �tt[em, �Elttssttrlfuse##s m • Tj f Department of?Puklir ?Morks kRec�o�' NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINEER July 28,1965. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass, Re: Day Avenue water service. Gentlemen: The enclosed plan entitled "Proposed 2" water line, Day Ave. , Salem Mass, Scale 1 in. = 40 ft. , June 1965, Edwin T. Brudzynski, registered surveyor and engineer" , indicates thaf the two lots in question are the last two lots available on Day Ave. Because of this, it does not appear reasonable to insist on an 8" water main in this street. Therefor I recommend the proposed 2" connection be approved. The city water department will make the connection to the main in Linden Street, but I believe permission to lay the 2" line in Day Ave. should be obtained from the abutters to that street as it is • a private way and not yet accepted by the city. Very truly yours Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer August 11, 1965, Attfy. Richard 0. •Johnson, 10 Colonial Road, Salem,,,. Massachusetts* Dear• Mr. Johnson; Re-.Day Avenue Water -Service. At a meeting of the Planning Board on July 15,1965, it was voted to forward your letter and plan regarding the proposal of Mr. Salvatore S. Reale to lay a two inch' water line for a distance of 375 to 400 feet in the bed of Day Avenue to bring City water service to his land, to the City Engineer, Mr.. 'Neal B„ Mitehell. for his rec-- ommendations. The Board received a communication from Mr,. Mitchell. in replya. and a copy of his letter is enclosed. The Flan tying Board of the City of. Salem has no objection •to this proposal,providing all of the recommendations and sugges tions are complied with. Your attention is directed to the second paragraph of'Mrt Mitchell's letter ,wherein he .states that permiss- ion to lay the 2" line should be obtained from the abutters ; to that street as it is a .private way, and not yet accepted by the City.. ° e • k Very truly yours, ARP.cc � cting airman. a August 110 1965. Att'y, Richard Q, Johnson, 10 Colonial Road, Salem,_ Vassachusetts Hear &tr: , Johnson: Re:.Day Avenue Dater Service. At a meeting of the Planning Board on July 15, 1965# it was voted to forward your letter and plan regarding the proposal of Mr.. Salvatore S, Reale to lay a two inch water line for a distance of 375 to 400 feet in the 'bed of Day Avenue to bring City water service to his land, to the City Engineer, Mr, Neal B# Mitchell for his rec- ommendations* The Board received-a communication, from Mr. Mitchell in reply, and a copy of his letter is enclosed* The Platt- Hing Board of the City of Salem has no objection to this proposal,providing all of the recommendations and sugges- li tions- are complied with. Your attention is directed-to the secossd paragraph of Vx.@ Mitchell's letter wherein he states that permiss- ion to lay the 2" line should be obtained from the abutters to that street as it is a private way, and not yet accepted by the City* , f Very truly pours, ARY':cc - MM ChaTrnan# - . • e August 24, 1965. MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1965• A quorum being present, the meeting was opened at 7:30 P.M. Members present were Michael Paskowski, Gerald McCarthy, and Raymond Sweeney. Members absent were John M. Gray, Jr. , and Albert R. Pitcoff. Minutes of last meeting which was held on August 5, 1965, were ac- cepted and signed. The following is a summary of business conducted at this meeting: 1. Form "A" presented by Attorney George Vallis, representing Salem Acres, Inc. , land in the rear of South and Summit Streets to be added to land of Salem Acres, Inc. , which presently has sufficient frontage on a public way. Voted to endorse. 2. Form "A" presented by Attorneys Doyle and Doyle, for Armand Blais, to add land at 179 Boston Street to land of Federal Machine Shop, which has a frontage on a public way. Voted to endorse. 3. Form "A" Presented by Attorney Harry A. Simon, for Alan R. Zion, Trustee - of Zion Realty Trust, disapproved because there was no plan submitted to the Planning Board. ¢. A .letter from the City Engineer, Neal B. Mitchell, relative to the acceptance of Calabrese Street was read by Mr. Paskowski. Board voted to write to the City Clerk, including specifications set -forth by the City Engineer. 5. Protective Covenant, Salem Acres, Inc. , to City of Salem Planning Board, drawn by their attorney, George P. Vallis, received from Register of Deeds. Voted to turn this over to Att 'y. Pitcoff to see if it is in the proper form. Having attended to all business presented for this meeting, voted to adjourn at approximately 8:20 P.M. Clem 3Ot RUM &PEASE " o=r-.az" ® BOORUM & PEASE y PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem,-Plassachusetts Dear Sir: At a meetin of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on August 190 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law • Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Salem Acres# Inc.# 25 Acorn Street# Malden, Massachusetts 2. Location and Description land in the rear of South and Summit Streets to be added to land of Salem Acres, Inc.# which presently has sufficient frontage on a public way. 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book Page Book Certificate 23684 Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, �D Clerk, Salem Planning Board 6 _ fit# ofIem, ttsttc se##s • r� r uc lttmm� nttra 19 3 29 PH 65 � � � CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 (64=4 Strert FORM A *tem, Passar4usetis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., _ _August_ 19a------------19.65__ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- p _-__-_ PeZn_ _- ------S a r_Y_fO r_-proper_regi s t ra t i onint_he-_Lan----------------------------------- parcel, Cou rt_sThi s __ __ __ __ _ _____ __ parcel1togetherwithadoininp -subdivided.ivided._ __ jsw and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the - Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant__Salem_ Acres,__Inc._.____________-________ ___ __ _ __ _ - ------------------------------------ Address 25_ Acorn__Streets Malden,_ Massachusetts ------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor__Carter__& TowersFhgineering_Corp ------------------------- Address -6__Fairv_iew__Avenue.__Swampscott_,---Massachusetts__________________ 3. Deed of property records in __Essex___SouthDistrict_____________Registry (Land Court Division) Book--------------------------- gmc Certificate of Title No. 23684 4. Location and Description of Property: RearofSouthand__Summi t__Streets------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SALEM ACRES, INC.. Signature of eor� ge Vallis • Address _70-_Washington___S- t_____et,__SaIem.__Massa _-_usetts PLAN OF LAND IN SALEM SCA L E 40 FT. TO AN INCH MAY 27, 1965 CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. SWAMPSCOTT , MASS. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF L.C.-PLAN NO. 23064A I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS WITH CERT. NO. 23096 MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND COURT INSTRUCTIONS OF 1959 IN MAY 1/96 f SOUTH STREET i y.45_ Ca. Nit N^6 } . 1 J W Q 0 W 3: 060 4 MARY A. DUNN cc m _ 3i °� p Q r I o U) i AREA 20,400 S.F. iN{Dyed • , t jIr C_ a C JOHN WHALLEY J b Y�Q � 4 o AREA r. m W29,005 S.F CD 0 W � COyI, J MARIE MC CLOSKEY I ,e.`C. C. 149.7? •.r�aR- ,,;s.,a._;... .......��••�� ;e �/•� JAMES M. BUCKLEY PLANNING BOARD APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW. F SALEM PLANNING BOARD T tlw �_ PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of.the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on August 1901995 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law • Not Required" on .the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Armand Blais, North Main Streets Middleton, Mass. 2. Location and Description 179 Boston Street, Salem, Mass. Lot A has a single family dwelling thereon; Lot B is being added to the land of Federal Machine Shopi and. will not be used for dwelling purposes. 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry 616 Book 5284 Page Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board • E C E i;E D (gitu of �$ttlrm, assar4lautts 3 1 4211 '65 Manning �Rnttrbr CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 (114mch %ert FORM A Salem, 45[assar4norits APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. 1 Salem, Mass., ___IS 1s-A-----kZ_ --__--_- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ----Ql.-s__—l—A �.�itx_ HiQ�2L_ __ ____________________-__________________________ ____.._______________ and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant — — xY n ae. — �t�- -------- ------ ------------------------ -- Address ---------------- 2. --------------2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor _____ _Qw�H___._______- G�Q-w y�A_�lL\______________________________ Address ----------------- 3. Deed of property records in _Registry Book ---�r2 A/------- Page ----6-Z-�l------------- \ \ 4. Location and Description of Property: __Xr\-9*S_.—QLa blah ----`-------9 — — —�--- AN _ Signature of Owner --- Address _Address _�o�.--�"�o�.....,,----S��S. --NY%,`�d. \Z, \-Ajaskk � . k4,CaNS 1 t PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS August 23, 1965. Attlyo Harry A. Simon, 221 Essex Street, Salem, Klass, Dear Sirs At,a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on August .19, 1965 it was voted: - To notify you that our a p cation under Form A dated July $j 1965 Alan R. Zion, Trustee of Zian yftealt) 1rUSrl for determination and endorse • ment that Planning Board Approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not, required of a plan . land in Salem is hereby denied for the reason that it is not accompanied by the necessary evidence to show that the plan does not require approval as set forth by Section II, Paragraph B of the Subdivision Control Rules and Regulations of the City of Salem. You may submit a new application Form A complying with the Rules and Regulations and such new application should be dated when it is submitted. Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board c Forms and applications were incomplete. Encl. Form A, and continuation on sheet #2 t August 30, 1965. Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Cleric, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts. Dear Mr. Toomey: The Planning Board will hold a meeting at 34 Church Street, on Wednesday, September 1, 1965, at 7:30 P.M. Very truly yours, JMG:cc rman • PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Mr. Augustine J. Toomey Y City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on - September 1, 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- y 1. Applicant Lawrence C. and Dorothy M. Slaven, 10 Grafton Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description Second and third lots of land - in from Hanson Street on the southwesterly side of Grafton Street$ adding 20.38 feet to one lot so new frontage will be 70.38 fte and taking away 20.38 feet from other lot, leaving this lot with frontage of 67.53 ft. 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 89 Page 22239 :4 Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board t � , A fi cA� C# . Df �zXem, ttsttcl�xzse##s • 'TSA p 1 `t <$EP � �� 4® �� X65 �lttnnin� �ur�� CiTSAE LM�MASS. 34 (ff4urrh f4trert FORM A 'f6alem, Lmassnrl usetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., _-August---31e--------------------------1965--- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- .-See ___._See---attached---sh€et--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination'and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant -Lawrence__(_( --- nd--Dor-otIly---PI---S3.a- el -------------------------------------- Address _10__-Gr_af_tfln__Str_eat,-_�alera,_--Mass.---------------------------------------____-- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor__Edwin---T.___Br1.1dz1nskj-----_------------------------ Address __260--1'_afayette__Straet,--Salem,--plass--------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in _SGu:theS'ri_DJ_atr_-ict----------------------Registry Book -----80------------ Page _222_3q-------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -The---s.e-o-Ond---and---th1rd-Lots__bg---lam_-in_D-rom ._Hanson__Straet__on__the--southwest€rly--&ide--o-f---4rafton--Street-: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner _A, _, I! • Address ��------��------�-------= James T. O'Donnell, Atty, 4 Looney Avenue Salem, Mass, f • General Laws Chap. 41 Sec. 81-L and Salem, Mass. Subdivision Regulations Sec. II- A Definitions, subtitle " Subdivision " " the division of a tract of land into two or more lots shall not be deemed to constitute a subdivision within the meaning of the subdivision control law if, at the time when it is made, every lot within the tract so divided has frontage on (a) a public way" " Conveyances or other instruments adding to or taking away from, or changing the size and shape of lots in such a manner as not to leave any lot so affected with the frontage above set forth " This division involves the adding of 20.38 feet to one lot so that the new frontage .will be 70.38 feet, and taking away of said 20.38 feet from the other lot leaving such lot with a frontage of 67.53 feet. Thus both lots have a frontage on a public way, Grafton Street, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. • • T • PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts 'Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on September 1, 1965it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Alan R. Zion, Trustee of Zion Realty Trust 7 Irving Street, 'Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description extinguishing part of an exist— ing easement on a strip of land at 12 Phillips Street, Albert and Mabel Goodwin, owners, and releasing to said Alan R. Zion, Trustee of Zion Realty Trust, portion of easement formerly re- served by them. 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 4519 Page 147 Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board a. Imo. - n Ctv o ttlem, ttssttrCPop ts.;L�� 9, g Flauuing POarb SEP 1 3 48 PH '65 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM.MASS. . . - 34 @Ihurch fRreet FORMA �slem;' ussuchusetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL . File one completed form with the Planning Board and one.copy with the City Clerk in accordance :with the requirements of Section II-B. . Salem Mass:, — August 28. -------19 �. To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the.accompanying plan,of r!$&ty in the City of Salem does mot con- stitute ;a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) - --- -------- -- ----- -- -------------------- ---- and'herewith submi4,Isaid plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control.Law is not.required. • L, `Name of Applicant A� fir--- IU#s `-- �f!' z#------y► i�`t31�bfi ------------------ Address ? xI'VQA 94910t, §4 d* M11bO*Ch4 W – 2. 'Name of Engineer or Surveyor 4wa-_T• tldid##[#i - - Address 260 - 4 h"# a l':St1Cld4y Wom 1l ltilG$Ittlle i 3. Deed of,property records in dd 8tt gt 1 11 $ ----- -----=-Registry ofol l 0� Book' Page Sia d_Y89L1D 60O �pt,�►.�' A t a bt ilt�! XiG1fiJ. '8 t(i 4. :Location and Description of Property `r�lsl�� � __ t14�__to'�lb�� +� u ]t urtwt. IUft 4 044 gr_dwou hiW of aid Q :tdtd _RICA 00*040ad to AXl ort 000dw_iti 444 U061 T4 1GW 4Wi>Y., AY 4*" dat4t: Wirth $3; 143:"4 V*COV40446tcb ?fir, 1063 Rd te0ft sbutty DkOW0 2p#i0tty Of Otedo Ott ?R 045 Ott iso 527o AA xi` CA 4vVlo tint Uabol T# 000dwta ;Oxw yed'td A144 a► Moot Tgust0d at Z10A Ref"t 'tT*44t, under - - ---- ---- -------- A000 G04Wia OW MOW T. OWAWIus kttl" iw fldty, Signature of Owner ---- ----- Address 04tSS4Satq_3 -t ".1 ------ OTY O,�}�°�f=SALFCM,ING �f��MASSAC;;�?' XTT6 PLAy�r Sheet Number $ a Declaration of Trust dated November 140 Me and recorded to zosex South • District Registry of Deeds to 1400k4549. Page Z77* a strip of land described In said deed and the graaotors. Albert Goodwin sad M1dre1 'T. Goodwin in said . deed reserved for themselves an easomatra over pare of said strip. The strip over which such easement was granted 110 described to s614 deed as Lot "13", There was recorded with said deed a plan entitled "Und of Albert and Mabel T, Goodish�r. Saletsa. Mass.. ovale 1 to. + 10 Leet, March* 1969. Thomas A. Appla ton, C.9.1" coot%hatag about 1756 ealuare fest., A copy of said Appleton glare is attached hereto. Prior to the recording of said deed and of said Appleton, plan,. the Planning Hoard of the City of Salem determined that approval by sold board un4ir the Subdtvteion Control Law was not rarqutred for said plan and signed an ondorse- went to such effect on site plan lgilowing which said plan was recorded in saidRegistry an March 26. 196S in Hoak 5049 at Page UiWd Albert Goedwin and Mabel 'T.,Good w1n having since determined to convey to the said A16n R. Zion. Trustee of Zion Realty Trust, a perpetual easement iia a portion of their remaining part of said property numbered 1Z Phillips Street in the City of Salem for the purpose of porniitting a now settling basin to.be installed there- 1A for use in connection with a tannery situated ou land of Zion Realty Trrust lying adjacent to said Goodwin propertyt and having decided absa to release to said Alan R. Zions Trustee of Zion Realty Trust, his successors and assigns, and eo t agut h, a portion of the sasemerd reserved by thein on March U. 1465 in and by their said deed to said Alan R. Zion, Trustee of Zion Roolty Tmats caused a now plana to be drawn by Edwin T. Brudsynskto a civil engineer, dated '"March 19631t showing the land which is to be subject to the said new easement of Alan R. Zion. Trustee of Zion Realty Tunes and showing the portion of their slareraid easement which teas to.be released.aad exttaguiohed. Pursuant thereto. said Gilbert Goodwin and Mabel To Goodwin on May 19. 1965 executed and or-U aowtedgod an instrument granting said ease- meat to the said Alan R. Zion. 'Trustee of Mari Realty Trust. and cwthi same day also executers and acknowledged a partial release of their sawn said ease= ment of March 130 19t3.• A copy of 06 14 Brudaeyaski plan is attached herato. Said plass and said instrument created said now easement to said Alan R. Zion. as Tmotes as aforesaid, and acid partial release of easement have heretofore been preseutod W and approved by the Citic,$ol etter of the City of Sanaa as to correctness of form. Albert Goodwin and Mabel T. Goodwin., By,their attorney', $lgnature of Owner A9dresso g21 inose:% Street, Salem. Manan. a i i i J 0 � y sar, 1 J ' Ca.�f,Ta/Lo� �afr cii�t� •So%m P/o��,�0 6'000/ t I JOHN M. GRAY CO. - ARCHITECTS - 153 MILK STREET, BOSTON MASS. 02109 TRANSMITTAL OF DRAWINGS RECORD �- rtDate Augist 90, 1965 PROJECT: Calam 7nning M;n And nrrlinAnro TO: Mra_ Chrictina Callahan — — Salm Plannina Board herewith ❑ approved, as noted 13We are returning ®der separate cover ❑ return after correction ❑ ( herewith 13progress prints 13We are sending 1 under separate cover ❑ for use on job ❑ NO. OF DRAWING DATE OF PRINTS NUMBER DRAWING DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR r.,,I^^• ^F letter sent to Mr Atagtistina J Toomey ragarriing SAlem 7nnjng Maly, i The enclosed is for the Planning Board s Files. JOHN M. GRAY Co. By John M- Gray., JF August 20, 1963 Res Zoning Map Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk City Hall 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: Enclosed are six copies of the Zoning Map as approved and adopted for second passage on August 19, 1963. The only change on this copy from the copy that was received last evening is that the dimension on the left side of Boston Street in the B-2 District has been changed from 143 feet to 140 feet, the 140 feet is complying with the Ordinance as adopted. I feel these six copies should be considered the only true copies of the Map as passed. These copies would be in conformance with Section III — Paragraph B of the Zoning Ordinance. We would direct your attention to this paragraph and in particular sub—paragraph 3. Sincerely yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ/jm Enclosure 4 "JOIN M. GRAY CO. - ARCHITECTS - 153 MILK STREET, BOSTON MASS. 02109 TRANSMITTAL OF DRAWINGS RECORD Date AIIf9IST 100 1 Qhs PROJECT: SALEM ZONTNG MAP AND ORDINANCE TO: MRS. CHRISTINE CALLAHAN R (SALEM PLANNING BOARD herewith ❑ approved, as noted E3We are returning order separate cover ❑ return after correction ❑ ( herewith 13progress prints 13We are sending 1 under separate cover ❑ for use on job ❑ NO. OF DRAWING DATE OF PRINTS NUMBER DRAWING DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR -� COPY OF LETTER SENT TO MR An(31STTNF T TOOMFY REGARDING COPIES OF ZONING MAP. THE ENCLOSED IS FOR PLANNTNG BOART) FILES_ I JOHN M. GRAY Co. By?OHN M GRAY, 4R. i August 19, 1965 Ret . Zoning Map Dated August 19, 1965 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk City Nall 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomeyt We are handing you herewith 14 copies of the Zoning Map. We call to your attention that the zoning map has been revised by the City Council and is dated August 19, 1965. A copy of this map supersedes and voids all previous zoning maps. There are sufficient copies for distribution — one for each of the councillors, one for the Salem Evening News, and two remain— ing for your own use. 7 After the Zoning Ordinance is passed for its second reading on August 19, we will await further instructions from you as to the date to be inserted in the Ordinance. Very truly yours# John M. GraTs Jr. JMGJ/jm i JOHN M. GRAY CO. - ARCHITECTS - 153 MILK STREET, BOSTON MASS. 02103 TRANSMITTAL OF DRAWINGS RECORD Date Au rnrst 96. 1965 ' PROJECT: City of Salem TO: Mrs. Christine Callahan — Building Inspector' s Office — 93 Washington St. Salem, Mass. We are returning herewith ❑ approved, as noted herewith l13under separate cover ❑ return after correction ❑ herewith 13 progress prints E3fWe are sending under separate cover ❑ for use on job ❑ NO. OF DRAWING DATE OF PRINTS NUMBER DRAWING DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR Enclosed copy of letter sent to Mr. John R S rafini reaard'ilg Lead Mills area. This is for the pianfling Board' s files. JOHN M. GRAY CO. $y Inhn M- Cray., J= August 26, 1965 Mr. John R. Serafini 126 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Johnt Already I have received calls from one or two Boston architects asking about the Lead Mills area in Salem. They are requesting information relative to the requirements of the new zoning ordinance and the present Building Code. I told these gentlemen what I could;; however, this leads me to the problem I believe you are familiar with. The zoning ordinance has not been set up to allow the Planning Board, The Board of Appeal, or the City Council to be mere purveyors of real estate. We hope to be builders of the city, and vie must spend every effort to see they become an esthetic as well as functional asset to our city. There is one ores in which we can all place a greater emphasis. This is design — by design I mean urban design, urban planning, and good architecture. Only with proper planning and with competent review groups can design be controlled. The new zoning ordinance in part controls the size, height, per- centage of lot coverage, set backs, off—street parking, etc., of all buildings adequately. However, it does not control design. In particular, I am fearful of the design of multi—family dwellings. Referring to Section I of the new zoning ordinance, we sum the section up by stating as a purpose "To preserve and increase its amenities." By having no control over design, it is impossible to accomplish this. Since the group that you represent seems to want to do something in the way of control, I have talked with other architects in Boston and finally I went to the Boston Redevelopment Authority to talk with the planners to see how they control the architecture of buildings under their jurisdiction. The end result is that they have a board of review, which reviews plans from an esthetic viewpoint and overall design, not to be construed as the same type of review that the Building Department gives them. Therefore, it seems to me the only way we could properly and legally control design in the City is to have some such board created. For the want of a better word call it a "Board of Plan Review." It could be made up of 5 to 7 members, at least one would be a regis— tered architect, registered engineer, a banker, an attorney, a licensed real estate man, a master builder (general contractor) and a member selected from one of the service clubs. { Mr. John R. Serafini -2- August 26, 1965 This board could serve overlapping terms from 5 to 7 years. Their duties would be namely to supplement the duties of the Building Inspector; that is, they would not be required to review plans insofar as the structural items - plumbing, heating, and electrical; th t is, the duties of the building inspector. The board' s duty would be to preserve and increase the amenities of the city, that is, suggest better overall design, better circulation, off-street parking in relation to the street. In other words, this board would not dictate any particular style of architecture, but it would try to emphasize the compati- bility within the immediate neighborhood and the general neighborhood as a whole. Naturally, this board would not have any duties that the Board of Appeal has. I do not see any real problem as to the legality of such a board if the administration and the council could see fit to carry it through. It will increase the v-alhation throughout the city. In all probability the board could review plans of multi-family dwellings (apartments), and possibly specialty buildings such as funeral homes and convalescent homes. Of course, it would be highly desirable to have all plans reviewed by the board, but I know that it is an impossibility. I would like to have you think this over and talk with some of your associates to see how they feel about such a plan. If anyone makes any sugges- tions, I would certainly like to have them myself. In any event, let me know what you decide. Sincerely yours, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGI/jm August 25, 1965 Augustine J. Toomey* City Clerks City Hall* Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr, Toomey: He:-Letter of July 2$, 1965 Regarding City Council Order with reference to Proposed Acceptance of Calabrese Street. At a meeting of the Planning Board on August 5, 1965, the Council order together with a plan of Calabrese Street were dis- cussed* 2t was voted to forward order and plan to the City Eng- ineer for his recommendations and suggestions. In reply a latter from Mr Deal B. ititchell, City Engineer, dated August 17, 1965, was read at the Planning Board meeting on \� August 19 1965. A copy of Mro Mitchell's letter is enclosed» The condition of said street is not presentlyacceptable to the Planning Board, An estimated expenditure of 7000, exclusive of the cost of paving* would be necessary to cover the cost of setting of stone bounds, storm and sanitary seiner installation* and fine grading and rohingw If and when this work is completed in accordance with the specifications set forth by the City Engineer, it is the Planning Boardts recommendation that the street be approved. Very truly yours, Chairman t ct3ng - ft, oars �r�gir ��r Over Sreet #status t z s _. Miffed at. the fact' that` °Councilor Pichard.W:^.Poitras• the plan-'i' board and�City Joined the'verbal.;battle against' Engineer Neal;:B:x Mitchell':.the planning board'and citgen had ruled that. Calabrese,gmeer.and,their,contention,that. the-street 7cannot be accepted street was'not acceptable ag,because-it;lacked;=storm,drains, a street,at the present time,. and,other essential services ti the°-city."conncit Thursday -1Poitras:said'that 'it one time, night'ordered a public hear.-"unaccepted'`streets'.received Vat -least a sand and oil watt but mg'o`ii`the is ue,held'Sept.y now they,do,not.beca ise gngthere 23 atr 7.30 P M`_ � a y,, '.is an.,"orde'r out",.to'that•effect:., xSponsor of the call for the -He'said:that residents of`Cala public liearinl, waspa,W ar"d brese street pay $10,000'in'taxea Three3Councit lor •Wdfred j: to the city and'that;the builder' `Pelletier,.whoxrgu'ed againstl`them 1f the.vghandtd�ry off,and-left the,adverse�report of the-, 6uneiloi SamuelM Zoll said planning `group"and +engi= that,.it:wd§ his understanding neer He„told his cplleagues':;that acceptance of,a streetmgst. that'rt was a ease of dis- have.tfie'approAi of the plan.. crtmmation ' againstV 5 '1i tnmg board°,and urged_.that,the sdents'of,the street`s nce the 'x � "'(HIT sOA1tn=),'_ 3; r - i x. (Continued on Paige Two)�:.g next street,is hot=topped•. _� s E, , `n ,�vcre[m':'a naR cssSav 3 his ,ward Born in Beverly, etas the '4Thil, iLNDED'; s d. son of the late r lber�r2fitn o F..(Leahy) Donovan: .,r, 'Pretty underhanded,"=a was- ; sides his -wife he is syr-. lvs final comment on the entire vived by two sisters, Mrs. Mar- jorie ce�pey.. I - jorie P and Mrs.'.:Elsie. •..,A's-for the residents ofRose. Bres•nahan,,bothof Beverly and circle, the communication,from several`nieces and`nephews...Y .Mayor Meaney said: that this - Funeral services will be pri street„along}with Dane gstreet te' and other areas;. will be"given ve consideration "when any.funds are still available after comple Francis T� Kings hon of the aforemen4oned pro- r l ;ects:'F ' Had Been Clerk` The aforementioned,.projects r include the following streets, on. 'Francis Kin �f o'er' �. which-work will-'start.this.year . Francis W King of 23 'Fed eral'f street Salem dyed. sud-. I Coleman street, Kingdom ter denly`a} ms home Thursday race, " Raymond `t e r r arc e; ing evenBorn in'Lowell he was Douglas,street,;"Jeffrey ,street the son of Mrs; Emma F' King� Walcott street; Forest` street f and s the late Frank King._He I Blair,,terrace,,.;Romnv tterrace ' and Alma terraeeI'�A'�sum of had;been employed as a clerk in several stores in Salcm - $257,388 has already been appro-> 1'+Bieides his mother he is sur , priated fore these streets.., " +rived;`by a sister,Mrs ,William Meaney said that streets to be i r (Marion E.) Fawsim ;,,two included.in a later project`this' metes and one nephew;. ; I year are Seamount`road .Cool` The-funeral will-:be held from 1 idge?,iroadI and Ciesmut Street the John'�F Greene PuneraL., extension He.¢estunated ;that home,'-?Saturday%�mornnig",at 8; { $48,580 wouldkbe appropriated followed by a high mass of re- soon-to unplement tins project quiem=m Fmmaculate Concep= � � f� � �"�` hon church at 9 ,dip,' i'�,Y`•` If aCfl:0 y e .(Cmthm from Pap One). council sit down with the city. engineer and-.planning board. Iron out the difficulties and then proceed. (, Councilors Philip L. Morency, and+Poitras'both argued at! ,the laykig out of a street 5s a� .city council prerogative:and nob up atorthe planning board. :Morency said that acceptance of .city'streets 114 vested-in Uiel p council under Chapter 28 of thei 'General.Laws-'and is'invio-, J late. efil s e ITO COST.$7100 J 4.in the.communication it was, me e the-o I, ak-, Lig the-necessary,chenges,lu the] 1 street to conform_ to hguletions'q would be dose bLtc to S7ao0. ;¢ ".; After the puhearing mo- tion,was made COunmlor Pelle Stier,gamed unanimous support. - of a motion'mquesting the, I englneei,tp`ceek..an,appioprla-ti now of 57000 toP!fovide for'the. .]eying wt:of Cabibreas atreet '.x'Later in the;sea ion,:Counetior Marency,'offered(.a resolution that caused considerable.discus-.I Sion'concerning ethe.?status.of Marcla';evenue...lo,,the upper regions'of LWard'.Five. His;resolution,resulted in.a clash!with,Councilor.'Poh s i.over. -an�^�aileged, agreement, made many,yeurs ago that Mar!, eia:avenue would=never be'con- nected with Elm.Lvenue, -a 'street on which.,Councilor; 11 ency resides.-s '3Id6omcy's resolution was 'to, the'!effect'that the city disclaim' any liabnity,in connection with' Marcia avenue.;,q ' > 's The Morency resolution read: "The inning map now before the esty council showed anon- existent street bearing the name Mzrcia avenue;This is doted by the cty,.council."Such recogm tion rveriSes;the'fact that Net said;Marcie*avenue is rnot.a� street,m the'city-of:galem.That bila9rtepresentatidn oY said street; onae;map is hereby nullified."F "Comrnentlng on his resolution, Councilor"Morency 'saidthat! are are 5o domes ontha street7, and where the'street is-laid out there is a pond. ', t"-''-_ § w:He.said that his sonnets pre-' senting"the'resolution was:,'to keep.the city free of liability.'.'. Poltras shot back.that if the I street does not'exist Nere is no j lisbility'andthat'Ne council hes do authority N remove enyti]in9 from the map, L¢, .TO GET 'RULING ' I Councilor,.'Poitras, amended the.Morency resolution order to have the city.solicitor give a clarification as.N.what autho-' rity,.the:council'.bas to remove, any 'street, accepted or,un- 1 accepted,-from a cfly map;'? ' Most;ot'the councilors ap' peered confused aver the matter and when the vote was taken on the Poitras amendment it went. down�to defeat by.a 55 vote. ,.In favor of:the amendment. were--Counellors-+Joseph A. O'Keefe,.Edmond-J. Perron, Jr. and,Samnet Zoll,Poinas re- 1 cordedidmself as not voting" and Councilor Loins A Swimuch was,recorded ",-"present." Opposed .were Council Pres.' John H. Burke Morency,'John iJ.Butler,James W. lan, and; Pelletier.'Absent was Councilor George`W.'-MarqWS. - I" On a handvote;the body] - adopted,Moreany's resolution.',y Cowen r.Pmtras gave'noticei that he would seek reconsidera; tion of the vote at,the next regu-' lar r,meeting:., q„ fv ' ,' '., ., In a companion:motion,,.&on- 7 efl r Swiniuch pushed througha motion that:the city,council and' planningboard.meet.Aug.'2 at l 7:30-to discuss'the method now employed'"in'''having6s streets:. acceptedby the city.,, n a ts dor `8 - heir jet tlwsters perlodically P.straighten out theslowly an. -celemting tumble of the craft.' k With pilot Charles Conrad Jr., asleep,: command pilot L. Gordon Cooper.Jr. told-controll. gra the.tumble rate was a little.. ithigh — about two turns a minute' but"not too bad."' M"We didn't really feel much i specifically except that items I that have been flying around ee� Weeks+ Mart' men4oned lmisemg sept{e,tsnk-re cord-whin W caused•j a flurry.,a. a--recent;select- i mens meeting',at,which,fern-'i; illes-•'on Wilson ioad'4 charged`} their leaching field were;inade-.j quote.^,Only.one petmiN.had;g be 'for six homas,thereir aelectmen'were told:.' ..'Y1: I that session e, ie he.had [old'ybui'ldmg ltrepectbr,q Emerson Tuckerthat At-'was all`iigh,t to.issue the building - `permits since the septic,tank,j mspection'had::beew made.and",, :permits 4 for.i them would'..be;'f - forthcommg + k 4;, �+ %Reed said this morning that he has no comment lontbej ards action but thatsf he does he wljL make it directly fW the board s '4 F zm a q w is Delay x�,. lzoning ' problem was the most pressing`+ as far as he was concerned.He feared a heavy disposal of se- ;wage would endanger the well, fields fields y of I Eastman's Gelatine y Corp 8 Cauncdor john J Brennen 'said he had not discussed the matter with Eastman President Gregory Smith; who would not be opposed f the zoning lawj could be,worded to make it ne= cessary for•anyr industry to tie Into the city:sewer service ;,a �'In Tlie News. Page s s Page $merly + , 8. Jr Editor ,.16 BeViv Nsen+s S Manchester'::6. Boating ^'8 Marblehead_q 4.. Raeford R::10 -Middleton 10 Olassif'd 17-21 No.Shore 11 Genesee 16.Peabody. <.7 Crossword.X18 Radio-TV, 16- '�Danvers r 10 Rowley - g. Dear A••by., 15,So.Peabody 7 Death* m 2 Sports 12,18 Editorial 14 Theaters''+i 18. E... 16 Topafteld s 6 Funerals 12 Weather : 2' Hamilton W5 W.Peabody 7. Ipswich J'6 Wenhom k 16 va t �N 135�dy¢x St.,Essex Shop j6idoht Unfits 9 1; 9] ®ri �i#u of �Sttlem' assac4usdts ( tre u# the &tV (9lerk �ugixafine A_zaameg CHH Quark FOOMO 1 Mb 3 Mau all August 27, 1965 Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Dear Sirs: You are cordially requested to attend a conference of the Committee of the Whole in the Council Chamber on Thursday, September 2, 1965 at 7:30 P.M. • relative to the matter of the acceptance of streets. Very truly yours, CITY CLERK oe ae qua' CITY OF SALEM - PLANNING BOARD NOTICE: CHANGE OF TIME . The Planning Board meet. ing, scheduled 'for Thursday, September 2, 1965, will be held on Wednesday, September 1, 1965, at 7:30 P.M. at 34 Church Street, Salem. CITY PLANNING BOARD John M. Gray, Jr., Chairman A211,11, Se t. 1 965. v 1 :lar. On beautiful';landscapetl'lot.ale>i wootla Topifleld., Asking $18,9bu 00 Cal' 5 887-'6¢5. .,.aCa'w"eY5 wn a t„ ' ';j �� ',WEST P,EAOODY ,^$1400{takes over) 1-year•old,-3-bedroom Ranch!:,Tlle•,bath, 4; G.E. electric'.kltcheM .antl 'disposal. Full basement.. Excellent condlflon.''Garner k'1 wooded lot" Owner, 5757879 x an ge raDANVERS'ri C Love mound.T Me` JO or'fol J'roont i,,2 to be found. Three .at..br'fouritchen,.i„9sal,,,base lent;Plb3J :cc. large closed-in. potib.,2 disposal,,,basement;.plBy� Ne' room, ,bake-In;node,R fact,arage,,anc `mr I"wim ng kPii 1. tlrc per}ett;'a;ash�Ir 1S swimming $aol.".In the 510,000's, Irene N�., Winston VA 714-d79d� on' 4'SALEM' Near <omman:R-fdmlly_6'6, oto., New oil heat,'7M wiring; copper plumb ler, 'Ina $7$900 Alden.Cabot a ty'<Ina?PI <3039 i�t y r CITY PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF CHANGE OF TIME The Planning Board meeting, scheduled for Thursday, September 2, 1965, will be held on Wednesday, Sep- tember 1, 1965, at 7:30 P.M. at 34 Church Street, Salem. CITY PLANNING BOARD Aug. 31, 1965 _ John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman K '� 1 • August 2.5 1965 Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, City Hall, Salem, Massachusetts. ± Dear Mr. Toomey: Ret-Letter of July 28, 1965 Regarding City Council Order with reference to Proposed Acceptance of Calabrese Street. At a meeting of the Planning Board on August 5t 1965,, the Council order together with a plan of Calabrese Street were dis- cussed., It was noted to forward order and plan to the City Eng- ineer for his recommendations and suggestions. In reply a letter from Mr. Ideal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, dated .August 17, 1965s was read at the Planning Board meeting on August 19, 1965. A copy of Mr. Mitchell's letter is enclosed. The condition of said street is not presently acceptable to • the Planning Board. An estimated expenditure of $7000, exclusive of the cost of paving, would be necessary to cover the cost of setting of stone bounds, storm and sanitary sewer installation, and fine grading and rolling. If and when this work is completed in accordance with the specifications set forth by the City Engineer, it is the Planning Board's recommendation that the street be approved. Very Y trul yours,, GFB2ccy7 -, > � "airman ct ng) — Ctu of ISttiem, Aassar4use##s m Drparfmmf of?Aub it Parks • Nt¢,E NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENOINKEH Planning Board August 17,1965. 34 Church Street Salem, Mass . Re: Acceptance of Calabrese Street. Ref. Street Acceptance Plan Gentlemen: Calabrese Street July 1965 Comments : Essex Survey Service Regarding the plan; The storm sewer is shown on the curb line. How can curb and manhole cover be installed on the same line and to differ- ent grades? The storm sewer is not shown connected to an existing storm sewer in Jackson St. as it should be. To connect to this Jackson St. line it would have to cross the existing water and sewer mains. The plan does not show that this can be done. It is also possible that the Jackson St. storm sewer is not deep enough to receive this proposed Calabrese St. storm sewer. • A manhole is required at the upper end of the proposed Ualabrese St. storm sewer and the catch basins connected to this manhole. A cross-section of the road should be shown indicating the proposed crown of the road and the sidewalk height. The sanitary sewer should be shown to actual grade and length. The approximate location is of no value. Plan should show how houses numbered 23, 24 and 25 are sewered. Regarding the street; Stone bounds must be set at all angle points. The top of the bounds should be set at finished sidewalk grade. Manholes need to be constructed on the sanitary sewer line. The storm sewer should be installed (if possible) . The road and sidewalks should be graded and shaped to finish grade and an approved cross-section. The estimated cost to put the street in proper condition for acceptance is $7000. This amount covers the setting of stone bounds, storm sewer installation (if possible) , completion of sanitary sewer, and fine grading and rolling. It does not include the adjustment of any lot grades or the surface pavements. In my opinion neither the plan nor the road is ready for accept- ance at this time. • very truly yours, ea cc e L Ckty Engineer �i#V ofttlem, ttstt�ltse## • (offire of the Tifg (fleck 1» tllitq @Ilerk �iuome 1 anL 3 0itq Mall July 28, 3,965 Planning Board August 5, 1965 meeting, it was voted to forward City Hall order and plan to the City Engineer forhis vac- Salem, Mass. ommendations and suggestions, asking him to in0orm the Planning Board of his suggestions at the @&r- Dear Sirs: liest opportunity. At a regular meeting of the City Council held in the Council Chamber www on Thursday, July 22, 1965 the enclosed Order was adopted. Very truly yours, —� iO ;�4- l AUGUSTINE J.'T/M&i \ Encl. CITY CLERK "Requested that the enclosed acceptance plan of Calabrese Street, be referred to the Planning Board for their recommendations prior to acceptance as required by law". Richard W. Poitras Wilfred J. Pelletier In City CouDcil July 22, 1965 : Adopted Attest: Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk • • s r , ` August Ili' 1965i. Mr, Neal B. Mitchell, � t.' City, Engineer, . City Hall, ' Salem, Massachusetts.., ' b Dear Mr. Mitchell; At a meeting of the Planning Board'�on August 5, 19651 it was voted'to refer the enclosed order and plan relating to the acceptance of Calabrese Street, to you for your rec- ; .. C >. .. ommendations and suggestions. ' :After you have had a chance to review this acceptance plan# we would appreciate your informing us of your ree- ` ommendations. Our newt meeting will be held on the 19th, . • of August, 1965. F • , Very truly yoursy ARP cc Acting Uhairman � ate- , ' « • _ - a R' ` August'111,11965 Mr. Neal Be. Mitchell; ` City Engineer, City Hall, ; Salem, Massachusetts. u , Dear Mr. Mitchell. ' At a meeting of the Planning. Board on August 5g 19650 it was voted to refer the enclosed, order Arid Plan relating* to the acceptance of Calabrese Street,ry,to -you_for your rec,v ommendations and suggestions. g• E After you have had a'chance to review this'acceptance • Plans .we would appreciate your informing 'us 'of your rec , ext meeting will be held on°the' l9th_ , . ommendations. Our n g _ • _ of August, . 1965 - Very truly yours,. 'ARP* cc . . Acting MaIrman a r . t A m September 2, 1965. PLANNING BOARD - - CITY OF SALEM • Regular Meeting' of the Planning Board of the City of Salem was held at the Planning Board office, September 1, 1965. The Meeting was started at 7:30 P.M. Present : John M. Gray, Jr. , Michael Paskowski, Gerald McCarthy, and Albert R. Pitcoff. On Motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To accept the Minutes of the last Meeting, held August 19. Form A Application of Lawrence C. and Dorothy M. Slaven, of 10 Grafton Street was presented by Att 'y. James T. O'Donnell. This con- cerned the second and third lots of land in from Hanson Street on the southwesterly side of Grafton Street, add- ing 20.38 feet to one lot so that the newfrontage will by 70.38 feet, and taking away of said 20.38 feet from the other lot leaving such lot with a frontage of 67. 53 feet. Thus both lots have a frontage on a public way, Grafton Street. On Motion duly made and seconded, it was a W VOTED: To endorse. • Form A Application of Alan R. Zion, Trustee of Zion Realty'.7rust, a. of 7 Irving Street was presented by Att 'y. Harry Simon; this concerns exting- uishing part of an existing easement on a strip of land X numbered 12 Phillips Street, Albert and Mabel Goodwin, O owners, and releasing to said Alan::R. Zion, Trustee of Zion O0 Realty Trust, a portion of the easement formerly reserved by them. On Motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To endorse. Letters Read: From City Clerk requesting Board to attend conference of the Committee of the Whole in the Council Chamber, September 2, 1965• Two to the City Clerk regarding Zoning Maps, from Chairman John M. Gray. To Att 'y. John Serafini regarding control of architecture of new buildings. Invoices for stationery, services, maps, etc. , were brought to the attention of the Board before processing for payment. Mr. John Barrett of the Redevelopment Authority extended an invitation to the Board Members to meet with him in his Town Hall offices for an informal meeting, immediately following the next Board meeting, September 64 16, 1965. c There being no other business to come before the Meeting, it was on motion duly made and seconded VOTED: To adjourn at $:50 P.M. p er Y September 20 1965, PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 16, 965 The meeting was started' at 7:35. In the absence of and at the request of Chairman John M. Gray, Jr., Mr, Raymond Sweeney acted as chairman. Mr. Albert Pitcoff and Mr. Michael Paskowski were also present. On motion duly made and seconded, it was voted toaccept minutes of last meeting but to dispense with reading same as' copies had previous- ly been mailed to Members. Form A Application of Irene E. Aufort, Adminx. "of Est. of Wallace A. Aufort, presented by Att'y. Philip Strome. This concerns a parcel of $36 square feet in the rear of 20 Aborn Street; plan shows parcel being taken from land at 20 Aborn Street, to be added to parcel of Louis Shaub on Boston Street. VOTED4 To endorse. Form A. Application of Leonidas Philipedes, land on Parallel Street. Board suggested that in order to give the Members an opportu- nity to view the locus, Mr. Philipedes withdraw his applica- tion,, and re-file- before -the next meeting. Mr. Philipedes was in agreement with this proposal., A letter from the City Engineer was reads this referred to a confer- ence with Attty,. Raymond L Cummings and Councillor Edmond Perron on the matter of acceptance of Quadrant Road. VOTED; Board voted to write to Mr. Cummings, acknowledging the fact that he had conferred with the City Engineer as requested in Planning Board letter to him dated August 10. ; A letter was read from Boston University requesting a copy of the Salem Historical Area Study of 1963. The Board has no copies available, but Mr. Pitcoff consented to make inquiry relative to obtaining i several copies, A letter was received,-'from "the Department of Civil Service requesting information on length of time Christine H. Callahan will serve the Board as office clerk, and whether or not she will receive compensation for this work., ' VOTED.- To write to Civil Service to clarify this'`matter. • • Page 2. Invoices from the Andrew T, Johnson Co., Inc., and the Thomas Groom Co. were presented. Board suggested these be held until the next meeting in order that Chairman John M. Gray, Jr., may verify same. Inspector of Buildings, Daniel J. O+Brien, Jr,, appeared seeking infor- mation on the new Zoning Ordinance relating to applications for permits to build or alter received in his department. This concluded the business of the evening, and on motion duly made and seconded it was VOTED: To adjourn at 9:25 P.M. Members then proceeded to Town Hall to meet with Mr. Barrett and Nir. Hebard of the Redevelopment Authority. Clem • • PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS September 20, 1965. Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: SeAt a ptAIDberel�, gig 5 he Planning Board ofit the City of Salem held on Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Irene E. Aufort, Adm$.of the Estate of Wallace Aufort 20 Aborn Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description A parcel of 836 sq ft in the rear of 20 Aborn Street, Salem, Mass. Plan shows a parcel being taken away from a parcel on Aborn Street to be added to a parcel of Louis Shaub on Boston Street, 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 3383 Page 178 Book Certificate Case —'—(Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board q Ctv of ttiem, Ittss�tt �zsE##s r. o 9��R!'CAllNp.{N" � P1ttttnIng 19narb SEP 15 IO 46 AS '65 SIT SALEMhMASS. - 34 (94=4 gireef FORM A galem, assarhuseYis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ----- ------/ ---------1946— To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision/ within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____ '----------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicantd �/�__G Address --�p_ • --n-`- -- --nom- —/��,GU!/i--------,/— ------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Sur eyy/or _____�tLL _____ / s i______________________________________ Address ----vCPy�--'- G1 /---- 3. Deed of property records inj�_�! >t __ _�� -Registry Book ---SYY---------- Page -f ---------- 4. Location and Description of Property_ _______________ __ ___ - - - ----------------------------------------------------- --------------— — �lLl ill_ 2_Y/--i 1---1 1'1 ------------ If ` ; , -- ,n ��r, --- - ------------------------------- Signature of Owner _ �i12�d� L L�l � �� Address -�-t� - -- -------- -=+�/---_-`- ----`?.. ..2 ---- — ! September 20. 1965, Raymond L. Cummings, Esq., .,70 Washington Street, -Salem, Massachusetts. r Dear Mr. Cummings : _ Re;:-Quadrant Road: Our. City Engineer, Neal B. Mitchell, has advised us that you have conferred with him regarding Quad- rant Road, as we suggested in our letter to you of " °August 10. Please advise the Planning Board when the ease- + ment is recorded at the Registry of •Deeds, and at that time submit' s modified plan,'iin order that we- can take . • the necessary action. Very truly yours, i RS:ccir - Q " At.i' ingiL'�chairman) .. " (9itg of �$ttletn, 'Massachusetts, m Pepttrtmettt of Fix61is Parke NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY HNOINEEM September 3,1965. Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass, Re: Quadrant Road (portion of) see plan dated Dec. 3,1964 by Osborn Palmer, Inc. Gentlemen: As per your letter of August 10th, please be advised that Mr . Raymond L Commings and Councilor Edmond J. Perron, Jr . did confer with me, this day, on the above referenced matter. They agreed to obtain an easement through lots numbered 15 and 13A, so that the city may maintain, repair, or relay the sanitary sewer located close to the fronts of these lots. A space ten feet off and parallel with the sewer line is required. They also agreed to have the profile on the plan modified such that at no section will the grade be less than 0.5%. • When the easement is recorded at the registry of deeds and the modified plan is submitted, it can be assumed that the major requirements of the city's specifications for new streets have been met. Very truly yours, Gi Nche� City Engineer cc Raymond L. Cummings, Esq. Councilor Edmond J. Perron, Jr. • .'ftN M. GRAY CO. - ARCHITECTS - 153 MILK STREET, BOSTON MASS. 02109 TRANSMITTAL OF DRAWINGS RECORD I • Date September 2. 1965 PROJECT: Salem Zoning Map TO: Mrs. Christine Callahan — Building Inspector' s Office — Salem herewith ❑ approved, as noted 13 {l We are returning under separate cover ❑ return after correction ❑ i ( herewith ❑ progress prints 13We are sending (l under separate cover ❑ for use on job ❑ NO. OF DRAWING DATE OF PRINTS NUMBER DRAWING DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR Copy of letter sent to Mr. Augustine T Toomey regarding Salem Zoning Map. The enclosed is for the Planning Board' s Fi1es JOHN M. GRAY CO. By John M. Gray, Jr_ 4 , September 2, 1965 Ret Salem Zoning Map Mr, Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk 93 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Toomey: Enclosed are five prints of the zoning map as approved and adopted by the Mayor on August 279 1965. Also enclosed is the • linen tracing of the mads which is the official map that you are to retain in your possession in accordance with the require- ments of the zoning ordinance. Please note on the map there are two places for your signature which should be made in India ink. As I suggested to you previousiy,when new amendments are made to the map in the future the linen tracing could be brought up to date from time to time with an amended date inserted thereon, and new prints could be made and substituted for the outdated prints. I would also note there are three places in the ordinance Section III — B — Zoning Map, Section X — Para. 1, and Section XI — Para. D on which the adopted date of August 27, 1965, should be inserted. Sincerely, John M. Gray, Jr. JMGJ/'m Enclosure r - . • September209 � SII P . 1965. Division of Civil Service, State House, Boston, Massachusetts. " Atten; Miss Helen M Pelley, .Head .of Payroll Bureau. Dear Miss Pelleyt - _ . e have received your letter giving approval for the employment of Christine H. Callahan _by the Planning { Board, effective June 16, 19650 This employment is for an indefinite perio.g of time. Mrs. Callahan. attends the twice-monthly,meet� • ings of the Board and `does the necessary clerical work: _ k ; The Planning Board operates on a budget, and. from this the sum of $500.00 is set aside for clerical 'ser- vices, the balance -of the budget> covering all other expenses# Very t • Y rul y;yours, . i JMG.cc- irman. ' W AV Wain, ajee,yeWL 02133 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR WHEN REPLx NG REFER TO 94-9347 September 8, 1965 Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman Planning Board Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: Approval is given for the employment of Christine H. Callahan, Principal Clerk in the Public Property Department, for additional employ— ment for the Planning Board effective June 16, 1965. Will you kindly advise if this additional employment is for a specific or an indefinite period. Also kindly advise if she receives extra compensation for services • rendered for the Planning Board. Very truly yours, W. HENRY FINNEGAN DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SERVICE B )/Y) (Miss) Helen M. Pelley Head of Pay Rall Bureau HMP-.MW C.9.22.65 Copies to: City Auditor Treasurer • l ' LpNpbw,Q �i of $ultra, Aussar4nuffs Mffire of toe (9i#g (Mak mQfQNIN.OpNP` .4W1 9 �luguskine,k`]_2Ramneg 49HU Minh September 21y 1965 Planning Board City Hall Salem., Mass. • Dear Sirs: You are cordially requested to attend a public hearing held by the Committee on Licenses and Permits in the Council Chamber en Thursday, September 30, 1965 at 8:30 P.M. relative to the use of the property at the rear of 63 Bridge Street. t ACGIISTINE . TOWEY CMT CLERK NOTE : Sent notices to all members of the Planning Board on Sept. 24, 1965 Received at Room 7, City Hall, Salem II altm, �{�TS9r�TCC�t9P��d ocT a ]965 (J- �, �, NNNNNN SSG4GV 2P wN a, Q Q 34 4I4nrc4 *t=tet FORMAalexn, assachusefis UJ w Lij UQ APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT tiN OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL o File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., _October__7,........I905--- To 65 _To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) it__is a resubdivision of lots prev iously__approved _still---containing proper frontage and square footage. It is also an extension of a turnaround road. -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. I. Name of Applicant ----- ACRES, INC. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Address 57 Hancock Street, Everett, Massachusetts ------------------------------------------- -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor----Carter---------- --------- &-Towers-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Address _§__Fairview Avenue, Swampscott 3. Deed of property records in Essex South District---------------Registry ----------------------- - Book ---5270--------------- Page ---82--------- ------- 4. Location and Description of Property: Gallows Hill Road and Almeda Street located in subdivision entitled, "Witchcraft Heights". ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ L , INC. by it orney Sigtramrs Btawner _may_ -----George---P:--VbX1-is Address __70shington Street ------------------------------------ ----- Salem, Massachusetts PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS October $, 196$. Mr: Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk . Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on October 6, 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law • Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Naumkeag Amusement Company, 150 Washington Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description 152-154-156 Washington Street Corner of Norman Street Combining Lots #1 and #2 making one lot as shown on plan 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 3200-- Page 33$ Book. Certificate 2$91$ Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board �t • lRanxnng Pearl SEP 13 2 oo PH 165 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM. MASS. 34 (Q!?urrll Street FORM A Salem, 'Massar4usetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ----- --------------------August 31,------ --- - --—19_65 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -------- ------------------------------------- _-_____ _--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant ------NAUMACt__AKUE __Co*--------------------------------- ----------------------------- Address 150 WASHINGTON STREET., SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor-------CARTER_&__TOWERS_ENGINEERING__CORP _____________________ Address -----6---FAIRVIEW__AVENIIEi__.SWAMP,SCOTT ---MAMACHUBETTE------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ---DECEMBER_------26,---1939--------------Regis r� ook -- Book ko A err Certificate of Title 28918 - o e 4 e ----3-38-------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: --_152-^154-156 WASHINGTON STREET CORNER --- --- ---- - — ---------------------- ------------ .0F__N4RMAN__STREET_-_- of-_Nl mb_er---0ne.__cons3.sting--of-_3,734--aq.-- ------------- Land--Court__-N—er-----20292E__old_.j,4t__Nlamber__TWQ___consiRti.ng__a -4,144______ sq,�_ft-*---as _per__plan__dated_August__2�,_1465---- -------------------------------- NAUMKEA ME�N�T� SCO. Signature of Owner -----0. --- � - -—-----,� t/ --------------- -------------- ---------- . Address ----15 _WASH N__STREET-----------------VICE-PRESIDENT -------------------- SALEM,, MASSACHUSETTS •. October 8, 1965, MEETING HELD OCTOBER 6, 1965 The meeting was opened at 7:32 P,M. All members were present at this meeting, On motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept minutes of last meeting, but to dispense with reading same as copies had pre- viously been mailed to Members. Form A Application of Hugh J. Gilbert, 75 Loring Avenue. Concerning three lots on Charter Street and one on Liberty St. VOTED: To deny this application and to notify applicant to re-file if he sees fit to do so, and make an appearance so he can advise the Board what he has in mind. Form A Application of Naumkeag Amusement Company, 150 Washington St. To combine Lots #1 and #2 at the corner of Washington and Norman Streets. • VOTED: TO endorse. Form A Leoridas Philipedes, 245 North Street. Application concerns five lots on Parallel Street, so-called Lots A, B, G, D, and E. VOTED: To deny. Applicant advised to present as a sub-division, and to file preliminary form and later definitive form. Form A Joseph L. Bouregeois, 6 Champlain Road. Concerning retaining Lot 583A and transferring Lot 583B with frontage on Cherry Hill Avenue; Lot 583A fronts on Valley St. VOTED: To endorse, 3 Ayes, 2 Present; formative factor - the lot is only one lot distant .from Valley Street; also voted to notify the Building Inspector regarding services for possible future structures in this area. Form A Julius Polansky, Trustee - Jefferson Realty Trust, 6 Saltonstall Parkway Application concerns an addition by purchase of a parcel of land to an already existing parcel, owned by the applicant, the object being to show applicant's land as one parcel. VOTED: To endorse, lots are fronting on public way - Calabrese Road, and leaving no lot less than proper size in fronting on public way. 2 Letter read from Att'y* Raymond Cummings of McSweeney, Cummings & ' Donaghue, regarding acceptance of Quadrant Road, VOTED: To place letter on record and await submission of modified plan. Letter read from Mr. Hebard of-the Salem Redevelopment Authority. VOTED: To answer Mr. Hebard's letter. Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. will draft a letter and forward copies to each Board Member before letter is sent to Mr. Hebard. Building Inspector, Daniel J. O'Brien, Jr., appeared before the Board for advice regarding applications for permits received in his office, relating to the new Zoning Ordinance* Each application was discussed at length and difficulties straightened out* This concluded the business of the evening, and the Members VOTED: To adjourn at approximately 9:25 P*M• er * I� `( BOORUM & PEASE « R'° C BOC r 1 PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS October 8, 1965 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk. Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held ,on October. 6, 1965 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant Julius Polansky, Trustee-Jefferson Realty ,Trust 6 Saltonstall Parkways Salem 2. ' Location and Description approximately 1500 sq ft and 5596 sq ft of land with a total frontage of 124,54 feet on Johnson Avenue, now known as Calabrese I Road. 3• Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry - Book 2$17 Page 51 3599 255 Book Certificate Case (Land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board EVENINGS 744-0533 1744-0212 TEL. SALEM 744.0213 JOHN R. SERAFINI ATTORNEY-AT-LAW • 120 WASHINGTON STREET SALEM. MASS. Jefferson Realty Trust Plan entitled "Land of J. Polansky and J. Freedberg"--- Parcel containing 1315 square feet: Book 4518, Page 286. Parcel containing 1500 square feet: Deed dated July 17, 1963 and not yet recorded. Lot "A" containing 5596 square feet. Deed not yet executed or recorded. All these parcels being part of land conveyed by deeds of Jerome R. Sousa, et ux recorded in Book 2817, Page 51 and in Book 3599, Page 255. .J (ITt#u of ttleln, ttss�zc xz P##s • � � Planning Poarbr 34 (94=4 Atreet FORM A Salem, aassncltusetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL um, twi File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy c o,n with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of LJ O1x Section II-B. art N ., Salem, Mass., ____________ _ 19_ O�tob�r---�- b- T d4larrjt* Board: The Undersig4%d, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitutoi sdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) -1-t___ . is an ,addition by purchase of a parcel of land to an already existing -- - - parcel--oianeiu---Uy--tei --a-pi-ieaMt s� -L-�ie--6bJ ect--b e zri�--to-"snow--tYce--aiip'Xlcara't s land---as---Qne--parrel_al2_as__sh-ova -an_tY e__aec9ra � ny_ins-plan-------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant _J_ul-is__Pcsla_nak ,__mrklktee-Jefferson ?aalty_Trust__________ • Address _______6 5altorlstal paltwa + Salem 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor.......garter_&_ Tower - - - ----------------- --------------------------------- Address _u Fairview Ave. Lynn 3. Deed of property records in _ &8_K'X__.aS2TlxF1i�teT1G ______________Registry Book -------------------------- Page ------------ 4. Location and Description of Property: __aPpx o]4_imt—e1;y---1-5-0 u , egt__and__-51Q6_______ e_et---Qf----land---4_ith_-s._total__frontLiZe of__124,-54feet on_Johnson ----- -A-venue-.---now---kn€sa---------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owne --- Address ---6--Sa -- - a_l_Parkwav -Salem • v PLANNING BOARD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS October 8, 1965 Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeti g of he Planning Board of the City of Salem held on October , 195 it was Voted:- To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law • Not Required" on the following described plan:- 1. .Applicant Joseph L, Bourgeois, 6 Champlain Road, Salem 2. Location and Description Lot 583B Pas shown on plan of land entitled "Land of John and Lena Sleison, Valley St., Salem, Mass." Originally parcel consisted of Lot 583; present owner is retaining 563A fronting on Valley Street, and transferring 583B, fronting on Cherry Hill Avenue. 3.., Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book 2730 Page 205 Book Certificate Case (land Court) Very truly yours, Clerk, Salem Planning Board • October 'll, 19659 Mr. Daniel J. O'Brien, Yr., Building Inspector, City Hall, ' Salem, Massachusetts. Dear Mr. O'Brien: , Ret Joseph L. Bourgeois, Lot 5838 Chefry Hill Avenue, On October 6, 1965, it .w.as voted at a. Planning Board meeting ,to endorse a Form A application for endorsement of plan believed not to require approval under sub-division. This concerns a parcel consiating of lot 583. The Pres- ent res ent owner is retaining lot 583A fronting on -Valley Street, and on which there is an already, existing dwelling. Owner is transferring lot 583B9 fronting on Cherry Hill Avenue, However, we wish. to -point . out to you it is an unaccepted • street and the ,services they are putting in will only provide - service for this one structure, and that fact to be noted -then building permit is issued, so that in the future, these . ,services cannot be extended. to provide service for other possible. structures. This lot is only one lot distant from Valley Street. r Very truly yours, • tCBBScb er +•.. yes _ .e • 4 .. .. .v e /� o^Z` —�' � � � I �• ��� m Tity of '�$ttlPm, 'fflttssarhusetts Planning Pourb um+e - 5. . .,..,;` 34 @I4nrc4 Street �alem, assttcljusefts FORM A Go APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT �{ OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL CNJ 3E w �_j File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy yw with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of o Section II-B. r Salem, Mass., ------------------dc_toba_r__6t----------19.65-- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) __ th of n question, i.e jd3B conforms to all thy zoning requ rements nts8o i1 11e � nc° tai er sran&a ead '83t- `in r we 1 'ncn pp Ie d an�'h -wosrinli- �r 1 "'"a. ---- _--- 'herewith on cri ndoR erewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ------ ---Bourgeols--------------------------------------------------------------------- Address -------6--ChaMP14ln--1_iG_atl,__Za1eaL----------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor---_E'd-Kill_` ,__Brixd7.yns}1---------------------------.--------_------------------- Address ------ 260_Lafayette_St_,_ ----Salem---------------------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in --------------Registry Book --------------------------- Page --------------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: _Loi;---5J.3-_B__as__shown---on_ 01_an---of l_and____________ entitled "Land_of_Jghn & Ten Sle_lson Valley_ Sty-_-5alcs _, H-ass. --------- Scale 1In. = 40---ft,_S---Oct.__1g6�.___EdW'int._T. Br dzynskiz_Registered Surveyor." Signature of Owner ____. _____ _---------- -------------------------------------- tor _ _ _ _ _ _ __torne' or ose^h L. Bourgeois of Address -------------- __ham __ _1 __Road-,..Nlem October" 11, 1965. Mr. Augustine J« Toomey, Re: -Form A Application of ; City Clerk, Hugh J, Gilberts City Ball, 75 Loring Avenue. Salem, Massachusetts: Lots #35-37-39. Charter 9t Dear Mr. Toomey: 21 Liberty St At n meeting of the Planning Hoard held 'on October . 6,` 1.965, it WOO voted to deny this application, and to notify the applieant 'to re=file if he sees fit to def aa. If We Gilbert does fie-file, he is'requested to ' make an appearance at the meeting so he cm advise the , Hoard what he has in mind. Very truly yours, CPB ���y 4 ice - Cleric. C� (Linen was returned to Mr. Gilbert on October 8, 1965 and at that time he was inf'oirmed of the decision of the Board)« . p R E . : ; t of 'Salem, 'fflazssarhuse##s 9� Y OCT 5 1 66 PM '65 Planning 19uttrb CITY CLEHF,'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 414=4 6treet FORMA &Irm, Iussnchusetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass-- ------------------ ---2------ --)----19_ S To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) _-_-__ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant ---------H-0- H-------z------- T------------ -------------------------------- Address -----------5-----LO-j--I'N-rr - V E --SA_LE /)I /Yl f1 S S , -------------------------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor__F_&A_N__ts------C ,----- v_c_}t_____________ ------------------------------ Address ESS K----50-A-V--)(---5 R�1 - 2S --cgeoT ST (3t_-VFRL_ EISS, 3. Deed of property records in ------------ SS G-- -____S_Q_____JD15_!__---Registry Book -----5 L D 7----------- Page ------- 4. -----3-� 'aQQ 4. Location and Description of Property: � 3 � -3_�_-3_Y �hwa / , w x21___ I -nr�?---___- ----- - -------------- ) -- -------- ------------ Idp ,,S.Q�— ,,,,, a4" e" =o A b I ) ------- (►°) -----------`�--=------------ - -=---- ----- It r -- Signature of Owner .------- MA-----� =---� -Q`""`----=-'----------------- Address -�fir- : t -0A-`---------=''=� --- --------- .�"2 • a - i F 1 Oetober ,ll, 1955► Het Form A Application of, Mr,, Atsgguatine ;J. Toomey, Leoridas A. Philipedes,• City Clerk, 243 Vorth',Street City Hallt concerning Lots A* Bt CO r. .. Salem, 1Naseachuaetts, �►p 'and. E Parallel s t seta Dear W ,Toomey• On octobsr 6; 1965 at a meeting of the Planning Board, it was voted to deny endorsement of this plan, 'and to advise the applicant to present this as a stub division, filing a preliminary form„ and latera def n-. i itiv4 fOM* s c. very truly yours, ' r . CPBtcc Merl (Linen returned October B, 1965 to Ctrs. Philipades; also supplied necessary forms to be filed.) ^ i • r E I (gtty II �t�QIIY� Fittnning 19nttrb SEP 27 9 91 AN '65 CITY CLEFW5 OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 (94urrlt f treet FORMA �ttiem, ttssttcljusetis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. , �y Salem, Mass., --- -------------------19-- C To the Planning Board: Y The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within thee meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ________ ----- �/ ---tel S- = �_ i1� - 1� � �Y1_S I`rs rI-fie °r i c<n _YQ�crs — w0.Ter a-ls-a---G1z` ° S ZeA2------<"cuaT6_tt_td-,- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required.. 1 • 1. Name of Applicant + L1 '/ . ----- --7------------------------------ Address ----------------- e 'nom_ J------------ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor____ i` ___r_f'____ t1�c PJ � �{1-____________________ zzAddress -----------�-1�Q--- —' — -- `�` ` ✓�'✓ 3. Deed of property records in ________� ___ 1 ._Registry Book —'y ------ Page --------V-`i- ---------- 4. Locations andDescriptio/n'ofP/roperty: ----------------- ------ --------------- C�_r a � -------- - _Y? S'Q PT 19" � `1- U ai- -7--Sle!__----- �1------- ' Signature of Owner �X�lv - 1G ---- ---- . Address — ' '� _ MCSWEENEY, CUMMINGS & DONAGHUE • WILLIAM H.Mc5WEENEY COUNSELLORS AT LAW IBOO-1999 MORGAN McS J. wEENEY 80MCS 70 WASHINGTON STREET RAYMOND L.CUMMINGS SALEM, MASS. HAROLD R.DONAGHUE September 24, 1965 Mr. Raymond Sweeney, Acting Chairman Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts Re: Quadrant Road Acceptance Dear Mr. Sweeney: I have and thank you for your letter of September 20, 1965. I have had a plan of the sewer easement prepared by our engineer and delivered the same, together with a meets and bound description for use of the City Solicitor in drafting the easement, to Councillor Perron for his atten- tion to the matter. I have also had the Acceptance Plan changed as suggested by the City Engineer, As soon'as the easement is of record, I Will advise the Board and submit the modified plan. Very truly0s' ,. RLC:p Copy to Councillor Perron. JOHN H N M . G RAY CO .• .,7„"E : I A "`�""'"""""° REGISTERED ARCHITECTS � JOHN M. GRAY, F.A.I.A. 153 MILK STREET • BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109 JOHN M.GRAY,JR.A.I.A. FRANCIS J.GRAY, M.C.P. Area Code 617 4264993 October 1, 1965 Mrs. Christine Callahan Building Inspector's Office City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Callahan: Enclosed, herewith is a letter which I received from • the Salem Redevelopment Authority. I would appreciate it if you would put it on the agenda for our nest meeting to be held on Wednesday — October 6th so that action may be taken on same. jChai ' erely yours, M. Gray, Jr. rman JMGJr:tab Enc. JOHN M . GRAY C O . ,a.TME Q �Q •vnnw wmrvrt a exxnms REGISTERED ARCHITECTS JOHN M.GRAY, A.I..A. 09 JR. JOHN M.CRAY,JR.A. 153 MILK STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 021 FRANCIS J.GRAY, M.C.P. Area Code 617 426.4993 October 14p 1965 Mrs. Christine Callahan Building Inspector's Office City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Callahan: Enclosed, herewith, is a letter and plan received from Ray Cummings relative to the Quadrant Road Acceptance. Please put this in next Thursday' s meeting file, so that action may be taken on this matter. yOhnVertruly yoursp M. Gray, Jr. JMGJR:B ENC. • October 22j 1965, Mr. Franklin A. Hebard, Chairman; Salem Redevelopment Authority, Town Hall - P. 0. Box 369,. Salem, Massachusetts. , Dear Mr. Hebard: I acknowledge receipt of your-letter dated- September 26,1965, relative to your request -of the Planning Board , to express an opinion regarding the progress plan submit- ted by your Authority. I regret I could not answer this letter sooner as- I wanted ' our full Board to thoroughly discuss the matter be- fore an answer was given. However, I- would say.the Hoard has examined the plan and it is our opinion that the plan as shown, particularly, the-traffic circulation and general disposition of parking • areas and other items, does not deviate from the intent of the Master Plan which was submitted by our Board to your `Authority. We further feel that although there are. one or . , two relatively unimportant items which could be improved • b . upon, that said improvements will be made by your group in a normal procedure while this. progress plan' is being brought to a .completion. The Planning Board looks forward with anticipation to the completion of your plan. Any 'assistance we can give,. you regarding this item, please do not hesitate to let us, know. - Very truly yours, JMG:cc r . F . y Chairman* THIS LETTER ALSO SENT ID:' MR. RAYMOND F. SWEENEY i MR. ALBERT R. PITCOFF ^ MR. MICHAEL'PASKOWSKI r w. \u. � n •ill ' . October 14, 1965 Mr. Gerald -T. McCarthy e 6 Lowell-Street Salem, Massachusetts 'Dear Gerrys . :,.. ,. w d' intend Eng ed , h r s a u h Taft of a letter i e d- clos e e ith i ro t 1 1 t to send to the Salem Redevelopment Authority 'togetherr,wlth a co Py of a;, letter dated. September 28th as received from Mr. Hebard. S Ilxould appreciate it if'you would;review this letter and ' edit'it in anyway you wl sh. ,',Pleasebring your,version of this letter ,to our next meeting ' on-Thuisday — October 21st, .so that a final draft may be sent to the Salem Redevelopment; Authority: „ . . . Sincerely yours, -JohnMeGrayp Jr: Chairman JMGJRsTAH Enc. I SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 7 TOWN HALL P. O. BOX 369 • SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01971 • TELEPHONE 766-6900 FRANKLIN A. HEBARD CHAIRMAN FELIX KULIK VOE-CHAIRMAN CHANNINGSACALL. JR. September 28, 1965 TREASURER FRANCIS J. GRAY ASSISTANT TREASURER FRANCIS H. McGRATH JOHN W. BARRETT .XECUTIVEORECTOR Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman, Salem Planning Board c/o City Hall Salem,* Massachusetts Dear Mr. Gray: Under separate cover I am sending a copy of the proposed site plan for Heritage Plaza-East. • The circulation plan is identical with that made public in March 1965. The plan, as you are well aware, must have formal approval of your body prior to a public hearing to be held by the Salem City Council. This approval will deal with the plan as it relates to the master plan, zoning ordinance, setback requirements, etc. However, the Authority respectfully requests an opinion from the Planning Board relative to the traffic circulation and its conformity to the intent of the Master Plan. A prompt reply will be appreciated. Respectfully yours, F� Franklin A. ebard, Chairman FAH:ec • CITY OF SALEMv MASSACHUSETTS — PLANNING BOARD 34 CHURCH STREET — SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS • OCTOBER 140 1965 /1'vy "!•'.e'er-.'.'t Mr. Franklin A. Hebard, Chairman Salem Redevelopment Authority Town Hall — P. 0. Box 369 Salem, Massachusetts, 01971 Dear Mr. Hebard: I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated September 28, 1965 relative to your request of the Planning Board to express an opin— ion regarding the progress plan submitted by your Authority. I regret I could not answer this letter sooner as I wanted our full Board to thoroughly discuss the matter before an answer was given. However, I vo uld say the Board has examined the plan and it is our opinion that the plan as shown, particularly the traffic circulation • and general disposition of parking areas and other items, does not deviate from the intent of the Master Pian *ich was submitted by our Board to your Authority. We further feel that although there are one or two relatively unimportant items vhich could be improved upon, that said improvements will be made by your group in a normal procedure %bile this progress plan is being brought to a completion. The Planning Board looks forward with anticipation to the completion of your plan. Any assistance we can give you regarding this item, please do not hesitate to let us know. Very truly yours, John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman JMGJR:B • y October 26, 1965, METING HELD OCTOBER 21, 1965 The meeting was opened at 7:30 P.M. All members were in attendance. The following is a summary of the business presented at this meeting, On motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to accept the minutes of the last meeting, but to dispense with reading same as copies had already been mailed to Members. Form A Catherine M, Donahue, 6 Cambridge Street, Presented by Att'y. Louis Baker. This is a conveyance, tak- ing away a portion of a lot and adding it to the abutting lot, leaving the lot so divided with a frontage as required by the Zoning Ordinance. New owner will be Salem Legion Associates, Inc. , DOTED: To endorse. • Form A Hugh Gilbert, 75 Loring Avenue, Plan shows land at 35-37-39 Charter Street, and 21 Liberty Street; plan not properly for Planning Board. Motion made and seconded to deny application without prejudice to its being presented again at some later time. VOTED: Not to endorse. Form A Massachusetts Electric Company, 441 Stuart Street, Boston: Mr. Earl Buker, 205 Washington Street, Salem, represented the electric company. This concerns a parcel of land containing 358.7 sq. fto easterly of Lafayette Street, as shown on print of plan D-6212; parcel adjacent to and will become .part of property of Williard A. Early. VOTED: To endorse. Att'y, George Vallis, representing Salem Acres, Inc., Witchcraft Heights, ,appeared and presented two letters which he had prepared to be forwarded to the Federal Housing Administration and to the Veterans' Administration, after obtaining the approval of the Board, and the signature of Chairman John M. Gray, Jr, VOTED: To approve, sign letters, and retain a copy of each. �_ J r • • �x BOORUM & PEASE " o U- FtD9 ® SOORUM & PEA: • wETING OF PLANNING BOARD - OCTOBER 21, 1965 Page 2 Attly. George Vallis, still representing Salem Acres, Inc. presented three copies of a security agreement accompanied by estimates from Carter & Towers Engineering Corp., for completing subgrading, and in- stalling water, sewer, and drain services, and construction of sidewalks and roads in the Witchcraft Heights development. Mr. Pitcoff moved that the security instruments, dated October 21, 1965, presented to the Board by Salem Acres, Inc., in connection with its appli- cation for the release of certain lots from the protective covenant dated May 189 1965, be granted, subject to the delivery to the Board of a Salem Five Cents Savings Bank account #86818, in the amount of twenty-eight thousand dollars ($28,000.00), a signed withdrawal order blank, and a cer- tificate authorizing the execution of the security agreement and the furn- ishing of the required security and withdrawal order. Motion seconded. VOTED: To endorse. Form A Veysal K. Abraham, 74 Beaver Street This concerns a. parcel of land on Beaver and Silver Streets. Owner is occupying a dwelling on Lot #1, and wishes to retain this lot. proposes to sell lot #2, leaving each lot with suf- ficient frontage on a public way. • VOTED: To endorse. Letter read from Att'y. Raymond Cummings, - Re-Quadr nt Road Acceptance, from a point on Marion Road to easterly side of lot Quadrant Road, ending approximately 400 ft; as shown on plan submitted. VOTED: To endorse, and to inform the City Clerk so that he may notify the City Council. A letter in reply to a letter from Mr. Hebard was drafted, and is to be sent to the Chairman of the Salem Redevelopment Authority. A letter was received from Mayor Collins, relative to preparing the 1966 Budget. Chairman John Gray presented a letter and copy of new Zoning Ordinance to be forwarded to the City Clerk so that he may have it brought up to date with the new amendments. This concluded the business of the evening, and it was VOTED: To adjourn at 10:05 P.M. • ` jerk* �l t IIfc�I�Ptlt� 2t88�ItttSES Ta�G Planning Poarb October 21, 1965. 34 (94urell Street ,Salem, passar4usetts Wo Augustine J; Toomey City Clerk Salem, Nassachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on October 21, 1965, it was Voted: - To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Con- trol law Not Required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant - Catherine M. Donahue • 2. Location and Description - 6 Cambridge Street lot on Cambridge Street between leo. 6 and the land of Salem Legion Associates, Inc., This is a conveyance taking away a portion of the lot and adding it to the abutting lot of the Salem Legion Assoc- iates, Inc., 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book. J+517 Page 437 Very truly pours, erk, Salem Planning Boardoa � Le - Ctv of 'Sal '7fflasear4nutto �° !9 1213 PM V Planning �ottrb CITY ct �r .� 4�€M, �s FF-!@, 34 !C[hurrh -'16treel FORM A ,dslem, lassar4usetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT ka OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., QCyd �� j - To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) 'ti;_ is 4 A"17 - taT k la ' � t--tAd1,---4-VIV)Toxtkr /VT ' �__ a`n' herewith sub Sm4f�said p�lafi for a deUtermlAiMA%dn'd encaorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. ` / 1. Name of Applicant ------ - -- ------T---- --------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Address --------9-------=�Gt Etil Cl Y► -�f Ste{ . SQ(C m r V3I !f S 5 ----------------- ---- — ------------------------ -- — ---------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor____-__-'__G!WM_____I--_____ky a-� ,_ 1-_ ti S /-- 1 - Address ----------A- D — )E f^AX'I_d — C4 1'4'q kl 45S 3. Deed of property records in _______ S x G-- - - - Registry �3 -------------- - -- ---- Book ---YrQ------------ Page - — 1------------ - 4. Location and Description of Property: _____0__ ___04_� ��_' ------ --- - - -- -- n• � Srt-----------_--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner &;t;4' 2 _ s ------- Address — — �! p,9 Et S� u1 ;:� r tris � . � . 0 n C � OrC«R^ Y a ih o 'A lw w tA � rs (b J I I ofttlem, �tssttc �zsetts • � � Planning �RuttxA October 21, 1965. 34 (94u=4 Sfreef �ttlem, �ttssttchusetts Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on October 21, 1965, it was Voted: Not to endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Lava Not Required" on the following described plan:- lo Applicant - Hugh J. Gilbert 2. Location and Description 35-37-39 Charter Street and 21 Liberty Street Plan not properly for Planning Board. Voted to deny application without prejudice to its being presented again at some later time, 3. Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Reg- istry Book. 5210 Page 235 Very truly yours, Uer , alem Planning Boa Dan O' Brien, Building Inspector requests the following information: . Alleyway marked 22 .50 - is this a right of way? Does house of Szczesny have any rights in this alley? Wwner proposes to build on 100% of land area. his would shut off the windows in the house in rear of Liberty Street . Does owner have any rights to close up this alley? • V E �t#� ofSttlettt, FC88ttLC�ttSC##S CITY CLEFWS OFFICE SALEM, MASS. 34 (94=4 Atreet FORMA Salem, ttssttchusetfs APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass. ------------- �' 1 }----19--� 5 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) _ � andand h�submits said plan for a determination anendorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant - - �S - '�------ -------------------------- ' -------------------------- ------------------------------ Address -----------------� '5 - ------ 1-�2nd'2. 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor ___ _ __ S e L� ____ / A _! ✓ v Address o`l s Ca�t�- �------ -x1,�)) —-----------------n------- ------------- 3. Deed of property records in __________________ ____� _ t trun ______Registry oD F�----- Book ----6 i;J 0----------- Page ----4-3 4. Location and Description of Property: _3 _-_39- 37-----C=AA� -__ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner._-_ __ D_L___-- - -- Y _________________ Address 1� - }- - �" =--- 1- - z- �'` . • d" CHARTER SiTREET �► • Spy '•'�� , 52.75 �0 9� d ry Area= 2, 726 o Q� \ C WTQ a `O ti Il7o d y lN.LAJ \ o v o 1 Remains of fent Bo/f L Rod R?ssogewoy 6' Wide for benefit of Gilbert prOA Right of Woy / c r. _back face of'' bldg..' I Romeo V. Le Bel et. ux. Approval under the Subdivisiav PLAN of LAND Control Low not required, under Chopt. 4/, C. L., Sec. 8/ P /n SALEM PLANNING BOARD• SALEM r' Property of Hugh J. Gilbert <s SCole:/"_/O' Sept. 27, /965 ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE Dole— . 275 Cabot Street, Beverly 2143 i cert a� C tv of *alrm, ssttc �tsP##s planning �Rnttrb October 22, 1965. 34 (94urrli *rPPt �AIPID �IRASSACIIITSP3SS Mr. Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on October 21, 1965 it was Voted:-To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not required" on the following described plan:- 1. Applicant - Massachusetts Electric Company 2. Location and Description - A parcel of land in Salem, Massachusetts, containing 358.7 sq ft easterly of • Lafayette Street, as shown on print of plan D-6212; parcel is adjacent to and will become part of prop- erty of Willard A., Early. 3 Deed of Property recorded Essex South District registry Book 3k86 Page 359 Very truly yours, er , Salem Planni � F� OCT I 1 10 03 AN '65 CITY CLEIK'S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. FORM A APPLICATION FAR 6NDO11SERMT OF-PLAN Btrgcna NOT TC REQUIRE APPROVAL File ono completed form with the Planning Board and ono copy with the City Clerk in a000rdanoe with the requiromente of section II-B Boston Maeo• _ October 1, ao'1 65 To the Planning Board The utdersignod1.believing that the aeccapanying plan of his property in the40lty of _ Salem, Mass. does not ,00netituts a subdivision within the Meaning of the Subdivision Control Lwi herewith subaits eaid.plan for a deternina. tion and endorsepent that PlwRing Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is net required, 1• Name of Applicant MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC CCMPANY Address 441 Stuart Street, Boston, Mass. P• Name of 1bgineer or Surveyor NEW ENGLAND POWER SERVICE COMPANY Address 441 Stuart Street, Boston, Mass. 3• Deed of property recorded in Essex County - South Registry# .Book 3486 Page 359 L• Location and Description of Propertyr A parcel of land in Salem, Massachusetts, containing 358.7 sq, ft. easterly of Lafayette Street, as shown on print of plan D-62121 attached hereto. Parcel ig adjacent to and will become part of property of Willard A. Early. MASSACHUSETTS EIECTRIC .CODDMPANY Signature of owners By, Address) 441 Stuart Street, Boston, Massachusetts E `r s m Vit# of *alem, fflttssar4usetts Q EQO� Planning 15YN4Y V4 lull.... October 21; 1965 34 (94=4 *rut oBalem, �assarhusetts *4 Augustine J. Toomey City Clerk Salem, Massachusetts Dear Sir: At a meeting of -the Planning Board of the City of Salem held, on October 21, 1965s, it was Voted:-To endorse "Apgroval udder the Subdivision Con- teol Law Not Required :on the foll6wing described plap: 1. Applicant veyeal S.; Abraham 2, Location- and Description - Lot of land at 74 Beaver Street, corner of Silver Street Retaining Let ,#1, and conveying Lot #2 • 30, Dead' og property recorded Essex South District Registry Book S1LOO :, Paged. Very truly yours#. er o em arming Board 3 52 planning �30arb CLER ,s OFFICE CITY 17 SALEMKMASS. 34 414=4 9tred FORM A Salem, Cassarhnsetts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ....Q_0- ---------19 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not gon- stltuteya subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) l_ sy,�uk •Fx-r_.n C... .lLiiLrt¢_r.�__c¢_G..,.c-_ .7 C '__•.G _ ��_g-u�-_.l i^-tet _w. _L'-La ��¢` "'L..',�' ,Cr%__�/ tv ------------ �i_•4__G/(�1�_OZ_St �4.fME� _--1 and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. n 1. Name of Applicant J\ -_---iJAa__��_--a't"Qo�______---_-- Address L ���� 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor---UAL ____ -------------------------__ Address ------------ 3. ----------3. Deed of property records in -----t__--- -----(�_�--d�--------------------Registry Book dZY0-------------- Pae - 4. Location and Description ofr er --- -__✓-�1� 2� Q � - - -L----------k�"Yja� "-14t I-------- �----°� --- -------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Signature of Owner ____�JQ"�{�_-k__b • Address -----7-JG —Qom--=- a o 0 *01\ R°\1td ,pec ` 4a E aS .� - v o N O N U tW I 51 121 + S.F -x`30 • mM 276 W ' M M. SILVER STREET .. m u C °f S70-41-02E-i M 50.04 d E 0 LL e E W MLij c� 5ti001 * S. F. "' W 0 O N Q o m d 0 O '^ z - O VI o i I � m � `^ 3 w J #74 #72 #76 i 50.00 49.8 3 - N70-41-02W CUP BEAVER STREET Approval under the SubdivisionPLAN of LAND Control Law not required,under in Chapt. 41, G .L., Sec. 8IP. SALEM SALEM PLANNING BOARD Property of Veysai K. Abroham Scale: 1 '=20' Oct.7, 1965 Date: OSBORN PALMER, INC. 15 Wallis Street, Peabody of �$ttlera, 'Massar4use##s planning Poarb 34 QL4=4 Street *Lem, Massachusetts October 21, 1465 Mr. Joseph Feeney c/o Federal Housing Administration 100 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts RE: Salem Acres, Inc. Witchcraft Heights Dear Sir: • The Planning Board of the City of Salem, Massa- chusetts, declares that it is not the present inten- tion of the City of Salem to levy betterment assess- ments upon the land or residence now being constructed by Salem Acres, Inc. in a subdivision now being made pursuant to this Boards rules and regulations and that in the ordinary courses of the events upon completion of the streets shown upon the subdivision plan the said streets will be offered to the City of Salem for accep- tance as city ways. Very truly yours, Chairman of i alrm, fflassarhusrtts r�� g Planning Poarb 34 Chnrrh f6tred �nlem, �ttssnrl�usetis October 21, 1965 Mr. Joseph Card c/o Land Planning Veterans' Administration 1 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts M Salem Acres, Inc. Witchcraft Heights • Dear Sir: The Planning Board of the City of Salem, Massa- chusetts, declares that it is not the present inten- tion of the City of Salem to levy betterment assess- ments upon the land or residence now being constructed by Salem Acres, Inc. in a subdivision now being made pursuant to this Board' s rules and regulations and that in the ordinary courses of the events upon completion of the streets shown upon the subdivision plan the said streets will be offered to the City of Salem for accep- tance as city ways. Very truly yours, Chairman • CARTER & TO.WERS ENGINEERING CORP. Jury O, l oun6eC and/<eporfe `SSEPH G. CARTER . — - 592-4986• + '• q' .I. C t' - > ' REGISTERED-PROFESSIONAL ENGR 9 LAND i15URVEYORS _6_.FAIRVIEW AVE SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. q _ October 72; 1965 , Salem Planning BoardI ' City Hall . \ ' ' Salem, .Massachusetts : 1 �_ SUBJECT:: WITCHCRAFTa-HEIGHTS'' SALEM, 'MASS ACHUSETTS Gentlemen: ' s At the request of •the developer, we• inspected .the above,—. ; . captioned site and have compiled a 'cost estimate :of the construction .to be completed. `l. ):w Summit Street. Lots, 24 34. The road is `to subgrade and', 4 water and sewer installed; -66nstructionrto be completed is: , �TlA7t� ..k41. Install water and sewer` services to 11' lot s.1. .$m 1,650.00_ 2:. Install 12" gravel'base ,and grade `road. ;950.00, •3. : Install bituminous concrete `road *an- d' sidewalks. ,3,150.00, 4. Install, 4 catch basins, 3 manholes and • . : ' =12 `-drain: ..,. :. . . . . .. . ... . . . .. . . . . . .�'.'. . 2,390`,00 5.' Install-8 'stone monuments.. ..'. .`.. 320.00 TOTAL •8,460.00 2.)" W�itch`W�a s `Lots' -34-37 and lots $8=`85 TheN"roadT is to sub° ; °_. grade and water, 'sewer and service's installed; construction to 'be completed is. 1. Install121.1 gravel base and grade road $ 500.00' 2. Install ,bituminous concrete road and sidewalks. l;¢00.00 3.- Plnstall 3�stone monuments. . . . : : . :.: . .. 120.00 TOTAL. F -- 32,M;00 .. . t•. r I a •V pk t n is CI VILENGINEERING = ' SURVEYING COST CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES — P. * y '• ''� ''ry t� ' �' r[. a - s' f , ', � i is {f\ 4v( (�`` ��� a �.nt....dr...t.w ..^v..+•..sr++.......;t .�-wss ...-w.. _*•*.f" %i+....:...er.�...n++� .Y+�*+ ' �� I p � / a,....r....... ,..+.. ..",.s.;-.}.�,,,s-.•t. -...-...a., +r.....—.--�.-,..•.r•^:a..3.N^-...L+..-a. .-..--T—.kl ,..' y> 4x�iVHlAtyu 'a,•'4t fi .� . i 7"- 3 €, � 'y '£� n�• t ���,ilt TF1� .w'� s. .) ' ^ t Ly� `:a a . RR 0 lZI 415333041 z.7r iaflf.}-�' *�:�.1.xu.. �a xr 'w <r '°r a' z�,>_rTr't t fir"` 4"k� :.,t 1'Fd5 lih}+.i _ �rn r e t ,t .,.i4 vx [ Fr '.x"'��Y •t n i i a + s vP iw s� ��'�9r� w a% F ...y s '^v. (w -`s r, � C y.c} 's- 'r-""� pplff� ��,y .a „r ,t,`. t,�•»; r^YfiCf Ar M "� slfy f t �J+�'yriu t3'3»,lEv2 I[Will _ �-S ]�},�' �\ - a1 }.��+� if.�J £�, , .T ;h.0 C'1'. -W� `• .AV 4l C: S i4- 'p F'+' jr 4 ;Y,�.�`r'•$(l � r..vaf ".vC y'"'• : `to 1. ll >.. r�`t> � F «a �+t.t'F!SC`�`s ,+y�7/�;CL�,"'.�(��i "�P'�*3 :.�)T•�-E�'�..�, .t PIs-!� .L.GFu:�'.r.4€Y.S. "��6 5 ♦'- �`` vd:iri�..v."t vsi£K e:,»�.���'�x}��� tf ti,:Sk .L�.��� a�DwJ�,"'..1�'�v'� S':�<16}��FL� t"� �,f? 1 i fX,.t s'a.�.+1. x s.'� � ! �a a I �Crlfs.;,�'{ .+ FiF!'��'.G'i SJ�.�i ) ���af�f.1' iD IS I'1; kt . Y � Y; £ ,t-�� .�w C��.l �t.+ir� ,t i• %a f —. ` 1A y > . .' YF i' 39sC31 G11ey 4 9 c 5 S-!7T .e a.ATi;x { J •� F� r FnISYt 4 r'i Xan}a w • , • ° + a �9{t� Ts.. -U!-fp t-f oLi1"�'F.rt`FF't.l ) -p ..a root '. R y yy♦ t 5£ a ye £ ' 'Lv!..F.�t�Z^. �s .li3is'•'r 1"s'i�"I i`4,:f,F7n '�2.SSA .��'>q`�#''4,[r-t�`�:�' �r^x:r�` � .'1,:'rr , s �v'. �Yr Fi' i-�r t34 f7jalfi l �eC.'T',.,t'Wk3..s.,^v't.t.I1 4Tr,7E;`StSITF •5�. J✓4}`a'G.,' }, r`' ' '.§, - iJ 3 r a • G:'�'tE').til3�ftf`jj xt!TT`0111 e. • irp. '}iS.Y ltiy..•., .eD•i�,S�Fa i :- yp [ i Y i • r r A .•ysrra4s _l`�9i1,���`cBNil� 'tR4'•!'f a �[,.'v-v+�t�a. ,..s, aP•IN 37H7JH?:.lfvt3 ,g CARTE R'&,.TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. ` �urve�b, Co;un�e�and /<eporfd ; ° f ',PH O. CARTER 392.9358 - - .Y+� a _: F. i REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGR. R:LAND SURVEYORS PAIRVIEW AVE •SWAMPSCOTT. MASS• October 7.,^ >1965 Salem, Planning Board Pag(i 2 n {•. 1 sal t .t.. Iy- •w 1 , a - d � �• .1 IY�III��IIIiI i 3.)r , Gallows *Hill Roads 11 Lot.,s 84, 85, and 37 thru 48, and lot 51. vWater, sewer, drains,= and services have been installed; " construction to be completed is c - ,. 1: Install: 12""gravel base•'and,,grade road $• 1,200.00 a - ! . H . : . = •° " 2:'x Install bituminous concrete.' road and. sidewalks« . 3'800,00 w N 3. .,- Install 14 stone monuments. ... . . . . . .: .. . . 560;00 TOTAL . . 5,560.00 s .. j installe treet: . r , Water, sewer is:_ services;:have been , 4; y,. Q . oro d; construction to , completed Zs: o _ . � f 1.. . ,Install 12" gravellbase and' ad... ; . .$' ', 300.00 m + -• f N. U). . o 41)- 2. Install bituminous concrete road andrsidewalks: 17,'03 0.00 x <; • ¢ TOTAL -1,330.00 o: o In ,� nCo•uIrt. Water, s5.) Valley Street 'andCa l$roewe F �.y drains, ` *' and services and_base`coat. of bl,tuminous concrete road - , y4-47. _� and sidewalks:have been installed,, with the exception •of 1 4 »« << gravelkbase�and paving .on lots 113,°:LL2, and lot 50,- " o construction 6,-be •completed is �.` w: ` • ' r � 1 1. Sealer coat of bituminous concrete on road ' and sidewalks. . . . ... .;. ::.«.,. ...: ,.•. «.. . . ....«. O C ° :' gravel• base and `,rade road Install 12 a lots 50, 112, and' 113....:.«.«,..«..:«.+. ....... . r` 700.00 ! r ' - 3., a Install bituminous concrete road ,and 'sidewalks.- _2 450.00 TOTAL.% . . 1 ,350,00 / Since.L ,JyA. 4, JSEP DCARTER, JDC/aJ CIVIL ENGINEERING RVEVING t ` _ COST 1QONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES ,, , v +. .. C'Mx.wS Wl' �iF�ti,!1'� .i F''lH`10733,`xi% r�' ,W0, Sa'K�.y 93'3 !4A.d 2L/+ Y� P�. .l.Y '♦w YRi OY„ap.,L 'vwTT•+w � „'l�uV,� 'n,'.'Yn""may'^'s ..�] .�� �y > � i ♦4 c k Y �w+r =::.�.. "w,__..r��+�.n.T.�..•w.T-.+,.w. ,�•�+..�.•.,... T }, -t e �_ . e a • .�Ey gr fi fla4 4. _ 5ua rt r'�>,pkv sr" f'' 'fi'•.� � �y.,...,, e , i a ` r ., [ p .'L» � •. .a, t�'rarC cat �y,(Td`'�Ttf Asa.a'«+-J,t'a r.- F ♦ e '•f � , C✓�ri t� �1 "' t. T'. 'T xP ss lie :M C �.'F,a,3, h7s 3S'} ! ¢?. Ii '4 t''3 •.tf1.:�[ {1 5 .17' ti'�'. [L S T. t p .s {' ��,if } •.:r a�� Y+,' ..e� i 4.'3L.+, wt�-41 iOn r3 E. 4 s iz e n l�""x rtk+ #n < #MW°44riK'sf -(Yr?:!^'a:. s' f G .d•ra�N . •y,;[`' s '" +. c ,p. C7t'3�'"m . �9fe"f'Y7c-t,4i...C'+'.,G!'ziJft3 C�' . .3 i } R.Cei� ::,c"3•r.,Fai.7 "'Orv.Z1. v.', $:J�c-'{"fir �}� ' 1.1+ 04 �.vys "23A "9 I rY`' } r ° a y«.a ,{ ».:.+a`` �• "w'u} v�+✓'y'#%'�y:,��iR1.r:A § ° '",k 3 f,r£.�., -1,ySlp,x,#s f$Cy"J ,;�i°..3 w°-i,Li'+,�a5 x _ �_ [a.� __ .l i'c31i g f.C[t+, rzRl t WasNy$ X'!f'? 3"# .+'';.3,t"s '',': .t".la�'�"�'rdS3:S I4Jy. fXtTbe Sita"' 8.fL`,�''a .! ae A c: 4 _ a > usL i�eue r a4 97 [ r ! 4 wohl taow)lr7---tt R' '1'- e S T Nric}t 2 "kms s`, .z ttf't,a 4�° r,cta �a}rad i73 i3 vv%!I;, baL- '{3t y9f 3 1 1 7 r!Y �.t?3�L'i�Y 4,0d }t §f i-1W lsJf . e :T L ... u "3'Cn � Frw rr `{aRs•.C" c' {S1:?.ff rYx rx �,' Yr1'ny x+ l3tarl°f tl5] 4 { t} l�t3 3sSGy x13 uPfw to NOW �1, 086 n Y'1,.6a r » . aa ♦ ....:• a r» .�<.. .. r .;r>r'. ;61� [csi£i ' ♦ � +.f.`a a ^;r7�sC3^z ii��� t'f;.r� eg''c}�y .�e�g7 [dip+:4' �"�.'..�.t< 3'217. �". f-° _ i' . fii• y' y ^'• i��e�r ? ° .qti . . ^i e • i'e '#s�.sT'. > . s>�.fA1 fl~�"- n�.k-}; [.�` "'3,':�..Shw ` ji xL' ,�[} . a � Ar.r+F.+In.S"�T+ •u!TC it\� "�Lif�i �a�.r� Q}a�,4 ���l,i;��tfl� Gni T.r41�.1:LrAMo�'�a.•d�b�.�V�3 f, � t i1-i'.., 4.1n ,�S.riY a i'.�•[ ', A s..`KC1 �r •,. . . } c � i. •,+ Tl. ♦ i. t'*,T f f rf� �C a��:L?^`1@1`3C'�Lq' . r - y� �,r`9` A4 , t x �',., "° ". '. i s- ae ° ��..y tR �J• ri �.. �Yra'^�ia,�r.,?,. + n� n'� a4 r .. „'� C b'd'`ti .1. � fi.§ ] e, y f `•♦. e, STa" r ,N�,� 1 a ^'.T+�t#� ar+`} 2.t � V . p s.•t4 � 't¢.+i'� {" 4 k ' °a� ���.."r. l ` Vol rr411 h, (4 a C.^ r h SECURITY AGREEMENT Essex, as. October At 1965 WHERFAS the undersigned, Salem Acres, Inc. , the developer of the land shown on a plan entitled, "Witchcraft Heights" dated January 29, 1965 and recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds, Plan Book 104, Plan 55, has petitioned for release of certain lots referred to in a Protective Covenant dated May 189 1965 and recorded in said Registry, Book 5277, Page "269 and desires "to convey certain of the lots to others and WHEREAS certain work which is required of the developer by the City of Salem Planning Board in the construction of ways in accordance with said Protective Covenant and WHEREAS the undersigned, Salem Acres, Inc. , has posted with the said Planning Board certain security in the amount of Twenty-eight Thousand Doliars ,($28,000.00) for the satisfactory completion of the work herein required. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the release iiy the Planning Board of lots hereinafter referred to, the undersigned, Salem Acres, Inc. , stands obligated to the City of Salem in the sum of Twenty-eight Thousand Dollars ( $28,000.00) as security for the performance of the work herein described. In the event the said work or any portion thereof is not completed, the City of Salem shall have full and complete authority to use the sum of Twenty-eight Thousand Dollars ( $28,000.00) or any portion thereof necessary to complete said work. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Salem Acres, Inc. has caused its corporate seal to be hereto affixed and these presents to • be signed, acknowledged and delivered in its name and behalf by Elio DiBiase, its Treasurer hereto duly authorized the day and year first above mentioned. SALEM ACRES, INC. ELIO DiBIASE, TREASURER RELEASE The Planning Board of the City of Salem does hereby re- lease in full, Lots 24 to 48, inclusive, 50, 51, 84 to 88, in-clusive, 112 and 113 as shown on plan recorded with Essex South District Registry of Deeds, Plan Bo,* 104, Plan 55, from the force and effect of the conditions set forth in the said Protective Covenant dated May 18, 1965 and recorded in said Registry, Book '5277, Page 269. IR CO Til OP' MASSACHUSETTS Essex, as. October vW 1965 Then personally appeared the above-named, John Gray, and ac- knowledged the foregoing instrument to be the free act and deed of the City of Salem Planning Bo e OTARY PUBLIC My Cow ission Expires: • F October 27, 1965. ' Mr* John M, 'Gray, Jr , f 54. Raymond Road, S alem, Massachusetts. • Dear Mr. Gray: I am enclosing the papers I think will help you to form your request for the Planning Board Appropriation.for 1966; 1. Letter to the Mayor. requesting 1965 appropriation, a 2,. List showing all appropriations for P 6 . in- the tannin Board duri • 19 5 r<- g G� c14ing two special appropriations for°'advertisi the ntaw Zoning Ordin- ance* , - k • 3.. A summary ,of expenditures to date from the 1965 PPro a riations. P If you need any additional information, please lem`m tie know,. and I shall forward it to you. Sincerely, • F OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT A I MASSACHUSETTS SENATE 5 STATE HOUSE. BOSTON pJ V MAURICE A. DONAHUE PRESIDENT October 15, 1965 Dear Friend: Friends of Senate President Maurice A. Donahue have completed arrangements for a re- ception in his honor to be held at the Hotel Hawthorne, (Main Ballroom) 18 Washington Square, Salem, Massachusetts, Tuesday, October 26, 1965 • at 8:00 p.m. Senator Donahue is most desirous of seeing you at that time, and has asked me to inform you of the date of this reception in order that you may plan to attend. Please consider that this invitation is also extended to your family and friends. Sincerely yours, ROBERT J. KELLY Administrative Assistant to the Senate President • (THIS STATIONERY AND MAILING PRIVATELY PAID FOR) �SO - W l�ram"(ram"W Y&eefi, �odte��i 0210 October 11, 1965 TO: Comprehensive Planning Committee, Land Use & Zoning Committee and Transportation Coordinating Committee Officers FROM: Robert G. Davidson, Executive Director SUBJECT: Joint Meeting of the Comprehensive Planning Committee, Land Use & Zoning Committee and Transportation Coordinating Committee Officers • TIME: 7 :30 p.m. DATE: October 28, 1965 PLACE: Metropolitan Area Planning Council 44 School Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 AGENDA: Review and Discussion of the Initial 1990 Transportation Plan as Developed by the Boston Regional Planning Project. Kindly notify Mrs. Gray at 523-2454 concerning your availability for this meeting. Thank you. • MAYOR'S OFFICE CKITFA41 STTR,I.L kSSJt4LMdS October 13, 1885 To All Department Beads City of sale= Salem, Y-ssssehasetts • Dear W- BePartmut Heads mast flag dad before Deoember 1, 1965 the Mayor their departments) estimates for 1966. The necevsaay slrr.,ets are ready for distri�.ttion in the Mayor's Offloee Very truly yours, lFRANGW X. COLLINS, MAYOR 1XC/a October 279 1965. Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, . City Clerk_ • Salem, Massachusetts.` m Dear Mre Toomey; Re .Quadrant Road Acceptance Plan. r At s meeting'•of the City Planning Board .held on October 21, 1965,• it was voted to recommend to the ` City Council that Quadrant Road be accepted `as an . accepted street, The additional work required by the City Engineer , had been done by Mr. Cummings, and it met with our approvale Mr& Cummings submitted-a modifie'd. plan which is attached hereto, shorting an area from a point on Marion Road to the easterly ,side , of lot 8' Quadrant I • Road, ending approximately 100 feet. A copy of the ' plan has'been delivered to the City Engineer's office... Very. truly yours, JMG:CC s. , mane Encle l Copy to City Solicitor, t MCSWEENEY, CUMMINGS & DONAGHUE • WILLIAM H.Mc5WEENEY COUNSELLORS AT LAW 1BO o-1s94 MORGAN J.MCSWEENEY 70 WASHINGTON STREET 1907-1936 RAYMOND L.CUMMINGS SALEM, MASS. HAROLD R.DONAGHUE October 13, 1965 Planning Board City of Salem 34 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Quadrant Road Acceptance Gentlemen: In further answer to your letter of September 20, 1965, please be advised that the two easements effecting two lots as requested by the City Engineer have been • executed and recorded in the Essex South District Registry of Deeds, and that a modified plan has been prepared, copy of which has been delivered to the City Engineer's Office this day. ery truly yours, _. _4 RLC.p cc: Neil B. Mitchell, City Engineer 1 *d to recommend to the City Council that Quadrant Road be ace•epted as an accepted street . The additional work required by the City Enginner had been done by Mr. Cummings, and it met with our approval. Copy ; to City Solicitor and ask him to Write letter of approval to the City Clerk. • of "Sttlrem, 'Mttssadjuse##s • 4�0�% �lMYCltiYi� �OMTI� October 27, 1965. 34 (912=4 Street slettt, 'QH00Hr 2xseYis Mr. John M. Gray, Jr. , 54 Raymond Road, Salem, Massachusetts . Dear Mr. Gray: I am enclosing the papers I think will help you to form your request for the Planning Board Appropriation for 1966. 1. Letter to the Mayor requesting 1965 appropriation. • 2. List showing all appropriations for the Planning Board during 1965, in- clueing two special appropriations for advertising the new Zoning Ordin- ance . 3 . A summary of expenditures to date from the 1965 appropriations. If you need any additional information, please let-.me know, and I shall forward it to you. Sincerely, 1/ • J v b ♦ December 22, 1961 The Hon. Francis X. Collins, City Hall, Salem, Mass . Dear Mr. Mayor: The Planning Board of the City of Salem requested the following appropriation for the year 1965 : Expenses - letters and mailing`, $150.00 Memberships - Associations 75 .00 General Advertising (Subdivision, Etc . ( 100.00 • Drawings and blueprints 800.00 $1875.00 Respectfully submitted, PLANNING BOARD, CITY OF SALEM JOHN B. HOOPER, CHAIRMAN. For •1966, do not include mailing, mail is given to City Messenger for stamping and mailing. • TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR PLANNING BOARD FOR 1965 = $6,411.00 of which $4, 536.00, two special appropriations for advertising the new zoning regulations and maps, would probably not be nec- S .,essary for 1966. DECEMBER 22, 1964 - Requested $2400.00 appropriation for advertising new Zoning Regula- tions and Map, in the Salem News. MARCH 8, 1965 - Requested appropriation of $2,136.00 for advertising new Zoning Regulations and Map in the Salem News. MARCH 25, 1965 - Council ordered sum of $1875.00 for the • annual Planning Board Appropriation (as requested ) . ( I believe $500.00 of this amount has been set aside for clerical services ) . • The following is a summary of expenditures for 1965 to date : Office supplies, including notices of meetings $ 95.50 Mimeo and stenographic services 302.75 Maps, etc . , Andrew T. Johnson Company 510.53 Basic Building Codes 36.00 Advertising 4, 570.38 TOTAL EXPENDED TO DATE : $ 5 , 515.16 (This leaves a balance of $$95.$4) • • r • m �t# oftt�Ezrt, C�ISSMLI#xzSP##s • ��s Planning 19varb November $, 1965. MEETING OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD 34 (94u==4 6t=eet November 4,- 1265 oSalttn, lassar4usetts The meeting was opened at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. Members in attendance were John M. Gray, Jr., Albert Pitcoff, Michael Paskowski, and Gerald T. McCarthy. Motion was made and seconded to dispense with reading minutes of previous meeting and to accept same, as copies had previously been distributed to Board Members. Voted to Accept. 1. Attorney George Vallis, representing Salem Acres, Inc., sub- mitted the following legal documents to be turned over to the City Treasurer for safekeeping: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Account #$6$18, in account with Salem Acres, Inc., in the amount of $28,000.00 One withdrawal slip, payable to the City of Salem, dated Oct. 21, 1965, charged to Account #86818, signed by Elio DiBiase. • Legal Document, "Vote", from the office of Att?y. George P. Vallis, signed Domenic DiBiaae, Clerk, Legal Document "Security Agreement", dated October 21, 1965, signed by Elio DiBiase, Treasurer for Salem Acres, Inc., John M. Gray, Jr., Chairman Salem Planning Board, and George P. Vallis, Notary Public. 2. Form A Salem Acres, Inc., 57 Hancock Street, Everett; Presented by their attorney George P. Vallis. This does not show a division of an existing lot. Plan is to accompany a granting of easement as shown on said plan, through property of Charlotte G. Tomlinson, located on Albion Street. VOTED: To endorse. 3. Form A Salem Acres, Inc., 57 Hancock Street, Everett; presented by their attorney George P. Vallis. This is a resubdivision of lots previously approved on April 1, 1965, Gallows Hill Road, located in subdivision of land entitled "Witchcraft Heights". VOTED: To allow petitioner to withdraw petition. 4. Attorney John A. McNiff appeared as counsel for Leonidas Philipedes, . to discuss with the Members of the Board information required per- taining to subdivision of lots 9, 101 112 12, and 13 Parallel Street. Board will write to the City Engineer, requesting the information it must have to act on this subdivision. • 2 5. Discussed advisability of having Building Code typed by Boston Mimeo and Steno Service, Inc., at a cost of $600.00, prepara– tory -o revising City of Salem Building Code. Voted to encum– ber the necessary amount to cover the cost of this work. 6. Moved and seconded to accept as rendered proposed Budget for 1966. Mr. Sweeney wishes to be recorded in favor also. Voted to accept. There being no other business to come before the.,.Meeting, it was on motion duly made and seconded Voted to adjourn at 9:05 P.M. '-� — Clerk. • November 5, 1965. Hon. Francis %, Collins, City Hall, Salem, Massa Dear Mr, Mayor: The Planning Board of the City of Salem requests z the following appropriation for the year 19663 Miscellaneous Expenses Including Supplies $150,00 Association Memberships 100.00 General Advertising 600,00 • Printing and Mimeo Services 800,00 Clerical 500.00 Incidentals 50600 IOTA _ $2.200.00. Respectfully submitted, CITY PLANNING BOARD C rman November 2, 1965 Dear Member: On analyzing the appropriations and expenditures for the year of 1965; I am suggesting that the following appropriations be requested for the year 1966: Miscellaneous Expenses Including Supplies. . . . .S 150.00 Association Memberships. . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 General 'Advertising. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600.00 Printing and Mimeo Services. . . . . . . . . . . . 800.00 Clerical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500.00 Incidentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.00 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . .$2,200.00 Enclosed, herewith, are copies of various requests and ex— penditures which have been made so far in 1965. I would appreciate it if you could look these over and be ready to discuss same on this com— ing Thursday — November 4th. In accordance with the Mayor's request, I would like to have all of the requested 1966 budgets sent to him on or before December 1, 1969. ` S'ncerely�+yyoours, John M. Gray, Jr. Chairman JMGJR:B ENC. • JOHN M . G R A Y CO . nuw mrvrt a ucurtan REGISTERED ARCHITECTS JOHN M. GRAY, F.A.I.A. JOHN M. CRAY,J0..A.1.A. 153 MILK STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109 FRANCIS J.GRAY, M.C.P. Area Code 617 426.4993 November 2, 1965 Mrs. Christine Callahan Building Inspector's Office City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Callahan: Enclosed, herewith, is a clipping. Please keep it in our file together with the other master plan materials. • You might perhaps bring this with you on Thursday evening as the other members may be interested in same. Sincerely yours, ' A/ John M. Gray, J Chairman NOTE: Clipping referred to is from the-New York Times, an article on Urban Renewal in Salem) . Clipping given to members to read, will file at later date. • y R . . «.' November g, 1965, - Mro Augustine J., Toomey, + City Clerk; Salem, Massachusetts. , . Dear Sir, At a meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem, held• on November 4,1965, it was VOTED: To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Cori- trol Law Not Required" on the following described plans 1. . Applicant — Salem Acres, Inc.,_ 2. Location Albion Street. (It does not show a division of existing lot. Plan is to accompany a granting of easement as shown on said plan. Property through which ease- ment to be "granted is owned by Charlotte G. Tom linson and located.on Albion Street: 3. Deed yofproperty records in Not Yet -Recorded Book . — Page - i Very truly yours, ., er e t �t# Of *YPm fflU65aC4U5PttAE 9T a. F Planning �Buttrbr RAA 4 113 PH '65 m CITY CLERK; S OFFICE SALEM, MASS. O 34 (94=4 *rept FORMAnlem, assasl?usefts IT APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL i File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., __________—November_-_______________1g65_- To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) it_does not show_adivision__of_existing-lot_,------Plan---i-5---tg__ar_C_WP_aMy____a_ granting of easement as shown on said__plan, and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. 1. Name of Applicant ------------Salem_Ar)nes_,--Inc,--------------------------------------------------------------------- . Address -------------------57---Han cock_ Street,___Ev_erett .__Massachus --- -- -------etts---------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor----Carter__& TowersEng. Corp............ Address _6---Fair_v_-lew_Avenue,.__Swampscott_,__Massachusetts --------------------------------- 3. Deed of property records in ---Not__y_etrecorded----------------------Registry Book -------------------- Page --- ------- 4. Location and Description of Property: ---------------- ----------------------- _------------------------------- Property___through_whicheasementtobegranted is owned_ by__________________ .Charlotte G. Tomlinson and located on Albion Street. SALEM ACRES, INC. by its Attorney Sigmturr ,�t l9�orge P(./ Vallas Attorhey��// Address _70_Washington_-Steet,-_Sa'lem_ I • November $, 1965. Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk, Salem, Massachusetts. Dear. Sir• At a meeting of the Planning Hoard of the City of Salem,m held on Nove ber� 1 6 it wa ae m 9 s 4 5 VOTED: ., ' To allow petitioner to withdraw petition. * ' . 1. , • Applicant Salem Acres, Inc., 1 2, Location — Gallows` Hill Road, located in sub— *-division of land entitled "Witchcraft Heights" ,. (It is a resubidvision of lots; previously ap— . proved on April 1, 1965 ) =3. Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry : Book 5270 Page,62 Very, truly yours, er (fY#g of $ACM, gaSS rhUSMS R [ I V E D 13Ittnning �3uttrb Nm! 13 PH '65 E CITY CLEWS OFFICE C� SA ' S• SALEM, MASS. 34 (94=4 *rut FORM A �alrm, massarhsssrtis APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass__ ....____________November-_4x---------19 65_ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) it--is a---resubdivision of__1 pts---preV i op s ly-_aRP royed__Szrl_Ag 1:11--1,___19_fz5________________ -- ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • I. Name of Applicant ______________Salem Acresz__Inc . Address ----------------------57-----Fla ncock_-Street,__E_verett,__Massachusett_s____.____ 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor-----Carter__& Towers_, Eng. Cor-.------------------------------------- Address 6__Fair_v_iew__Avenue_,___Swampseott_�_Masa�hlase_tts 3. Deed of property records in _-Essex---South Distr--ict--------------Registry Sou. ---- - Book ---5270------------- Page ---E2--------------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------________Gallows Hill Road located insubdivision_of__land__entitled,____ - --- - - -------- -------- - - ------ --- -- -"Witchcraft_Heightan - — - - - - - — SALEM ACRES, INC. r by its Attorney Sigmature `-- -_-__-'---/---�- Georoe Vallis Attoiney • Address _70_-Washington-_S__reet_,__ a;em--_---__---_—_ November. 6 1965: kG 4 Mr. Neal B. Mitchells City Engineer, Salems Massachusetts.. Dear Mr, Mitchell: - Re:-Lots` on Parallel 3treet Attorney John .McNiff intends to confer with you , relative to land on Parallel Street. @. The Planning Board is desirous of knowing the statusofthis street: q Is it an 'accepted` waysaor is it a way inexistence? -' , Are there- utilities in the street, and .if so what are rt r _ they,• and who installed them2 + Is this street maintained by the City? Any other information you could give us would be helpful. This is in reference to..a Form A 'application ' L which has been refused by theBoard« it is the Appli cant's intention .to resubmit this ad Form A.' after , 'discussing.this situation with you. Very truly yours, b JMG$cC "- Y rman Ctv of '*Irm, 'Mttssarfluse##s �a Planning Poarb November 5, 1965 34 C4urch *rPPt p�SAIPLt �$EE8rhltEPtIE RECEIVED OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS TO BE HELD BY THE CITY TREASURER FOR SAFEKEEPING: Salem Five Cents Savings Bank Account #86818, In Account with Salem Acres, Inc., in the amount of $28,000.00 One Withdrawal slip, dated October 21, 1965, payable to the City of Salem by the Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, and charged to account #86818, Signed by Elio DiBiase, Treasurer, . James P. Pace, Witness. Legal Document "Vote", signed Domenic DiBiase,Clerk from the office of George P. Vallis, Esq., Salem. Legal Document "Security Agreement", dated October 21, 1965, signed by Elio Di Biase, Treasurer, for Salem Acres, Inc., John M. Gray, Jr. , Chairman, Salem Planning Board, and George P. Vallis, Notary Public. Signed' -- Account #86818, Salem Acres, Inc., — City of Salem, $28,000.00. returned to Planning Board, 5/27/669 and given to George P. Vallis, attorney for Salem Acres, Inc., on May 27, 1966. • FORM B • APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section III-A. Salem, Mass. , November 4, 19 85 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned herewith submits the accompanying Preliminary Plan of property located in the City of Salem for tentative approval as a subdivision as allowed under the Subdivision Control Law and the Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land of the Planning Board in the City of Salem. 1. Name of Subdivider Leonidas Pbilipedes Address 245 North Street, Salem, Massachusetts 2, Name of Engineer or Surveyor Edwin T. Brudzynskl Address 280 Lafayette Street, Salem, Massachusetts 3. Deed of property recorded in Essex South District Regist:y, Book 5925 Page 85, and Book 5295, Page 88 4. Location and Description of Property: the land in Salem an Parallel Street, shown as Lets 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, on plan entitled, "Plan of Almy and Clark's Land, South of Eastern R. R. by Castle Hill, Sept. 1891," r000rded with Essex South District Registry d Deeds in Bode 1398, Page 1. Signature of owner • Address 245 North Street, Salem, Massachusetts A list of the names and addresses of the abutters of this subdivision is at- tached. Verification will be made by the Planning Board. JfMee �odtoiv 0210 November 12, 1965 TO: Members of the North Shore Area Transportation Coordinating Committee FROM: Mr. Francis E. Dolan, Chairman SUBJECT: Notice of Next Meeting The next meeting of the North Shore Area Trans- portation Coordinating Committee will be held: DATE: Wednesday, December 8 1 , 965 • TIME: 8.00 P.M. PLACE: Council Chambers Peabody City Hall Peabody, Massachusetts AGENDA: Review of Interstate Route 95 We hope to see you all in attendance. Thank you. • • November 3.90 3965 Att'y. George P. _Vallisf } 70 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts. -< - Dear Pyr., Vallis: # Dro John J. Toomey, Health Agent, has requested, a Copy of the plan of Witchcraft Heights which was ap. proved by the Planning Board, said plan to have noted ' thereon any changes or limitations imposed by,this Board. } Mould you kindly furnish a copy of this plan to the Board of Health with any further information the may require.. Very truly yours, . .d MJPSCC ng , h rman Copy to Dr, John J. Toomey F a SIJ ,ry fili#g n# tt1em, ttssttrljusP##s P Paarb of Pealfll �Raplan, Jffl_ , !L<hairmttn (� 5 PrnaD *reef pilliam Aa4-nnq, @r. Sohn c�9sativume� Mnseplji. irhttrD November 12, 1965 Planning Board City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: The Board of Health would like a copy of the plan of Witchcraft Heights, so called, which was approved by your Board, This plan to have noted upon it, any changes or limitations imposed thereon by you, • The Board of Health believes that the objectives of the Health and Planning Boards might be more efficiently arrived at, if in the future, we could be notified of any meetings where discussions leading toward the approval of subdivisions will be discussed, so that a representative of this department could be present. Very truly yours, T E BO HEALTH JOHN J. T, 0MEY4, ,D.S. HealAgent J T/h • y m 0-It#v of �z[em, ttsttcusQ#ts • r�s�cuar��''�, �laxtzttxt� �IIMY�1 �vhn �. I�rap, fir. N U ($rra1D fit[. McCart4g REGULAR MEETING OF CITY PLANNING BOARD �191i Iirhael Paskobski 34 Qlhurrh �kreet ,Albert A. Vitrvff HELD NOVEMBER 18, 1965 'f§alem, 'Massar4usetts �RttgmvnD �. �fneeneg In the absence of Chairman John M. Gray, Jr., and at his request, Mr. Michael Paskowski acted as chairman. Mr. Paskowski opened the meeting at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Albert Pitcoff and Mr. Gerald McCarthy were also present at this meeting. The first order of business was to accept the minutes of the previous meeting; each member having previously received a copy, the minutes were not read but approved. Form A - Application of Warren and Georgette Andrews, 13 Upham Street, presented by their attorney George F. McCabe - Lot #2, 13 Upham Street, containing 5400 square feet to be • conveyed to Karol and Nina Buba, abutters, who have frontage on North Street as shown on plan. Voted: To endorse. Mr. Angelo Trovas applied to the Board for a release from a covenant relating to his sub-division on Dundee Street as to Lots #3 and A. On motion made and seconded, it was voted to write to the City Engineer and request his report on the release of these lots. Letter was read from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Metropolitan Area Planning Council; notifying Members of meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, Peabody City Hall, Peabody, on Wednesday, December $, 1965, at $:00 P.M. Agenda - Review of Interstate Route 95. A card was also received from this group requesting information on the proper address for delivering mail to the Board. On motion made and seconded, it was voted to notify the Council to the effect that mailing material to City Hall, Salem, would be in order. Letter from Dr. John J. Toomey, Health Agent for the City of Salem, was read. Dr. Toomey requested that the Board furnish him with a plan of Witchcraft Heights which was approved by the Board, showing any changes or limitations pimposed thereon. On motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To request Att'y. George Vallis who represents Salem Acres, Inc. , • owners of the Witchcraft Heights area, to furnish to the Board of Health the required information. ' 2 ' There being no further business to come before the Board, on motion duly made and seconded, it was VOTED: To adjourn at 9:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Clerk • II • t November 19, •1965 y f Mr, Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, _ ' City Hall, ll , ,. $&18m, -Mass. Dear Mr, Mitchell: Re:-Lots #3 and #4 Dundee Street. Ata meeting of the Planning Board on November 18, " 1965, Mr. Angelo Trovas applied to the Planning Board -for the release from the covenant relating to his subf' division on .Dundee Street, as ,to Lots #3 and #4+ Before'acting on this application, we would appre. ciate' your advising us whether in your opinion, the ' covenant has been sufficiently•complied with, so that we can safely release these lots-from the operation of the covenant. Very truly yours, , MJP:cc t cting airman ry (gi#g oftt1em, tts�tttl�usetts • Pepttrfntent of Fu61ir 3Murks NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY 6NOINCER 2 December*,1965. Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass. Re : Lots #3 and #4 Dundee Street. Gentlemen: In my opinion, the covenant has not been sufficiently complied with, such that these lots may be released. Ve ry truly yours , - � � Plea.l B. Mitchell City Engineer • • • November 22, 1965. m Mr. Augustine J. Toomey, City Clerk,' Salem, Massachusetts. Dear Sir: At a -meeting of the Planning Board of the City of Salem held on November 18, 1965, it was Voted: — To endorse "Approval under the Subdivision Control Law Not Required" on the following ' r ` described plan: 1. Applicant — Warren H. and Georgette Y, Andrews 13 Upham Street, Salem, Mass. 2. Location and Description -• Lot #2, 13 Upham Street, containing 5400 square feet; lot to be conveyed to • Karol and Nina Buba, abutters to said Lot, who have Frontage on North Street, as shown on,plan. 3. . Deed of Property recorded Essex South District Registry Book "13 1 Pae 2 0 Page 3 4 Bery truly yours, ` • Clark, Salem Planning boar= Form A - Presented b ,Att' . George F. McCabe. Y Y g Ctg of �$ttlem, 'Massar4nutts P,;E :. t o Planning Pourb Wi 18 10 00 AN '65 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM. MASS. 34 494urc4 Strett FORMA �nlem, ttssncl2nseits APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., --- Aiou�_mbex----1-7-i-------------------19-65 To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) ____ ti_-the---tr-ac t_S-o---a iuided--kaas--fxo-ntage---on__a--public---Way. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant --- r �- a_n�l__ eor�ett� Y.--kndrows------------------------------------- Address _ 15_ITp-ham_St_,_3__Ss�lems–T`-�as�aC11t1sPttS 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor......Edwin_T.__Brudzy_nski______________________________________ ___ ___ Address --------- 260 Lafayette St. , Salem, Massachusetts._______ 3. Deed of property records in -------Es.s2X---Soiath-------------------------------Registry Book -A-413-------—------- Page --23D----------------- 4. Location and Description of Property: --------shown---as_Lot_ 2__on__the_ Gepmnany_iLt�____ plan containing 5400 square feet. Said land is to be...conveyed------- ._____ to__Karol _andNina_Bubaabuttersto_saidLot,__who_h ,.v_e_fronta_g_e___ _om North St. _asshown on the__.plan. Signature of Owner t-3--- --------------- --_1!_'__ ------- Attorney George TZcCabe • Address --------- e-,---Salem-0----- i Chi# ofSttlem, ttssttc �tsP##s • S�CLWNE 1han4{4L111 Vl4iY 3alln 13. Orap, Jr. UUUUUU (Seralb T- �91flduartllq December 6, �1rrii965. f trllael Vaskoibsbt 34 vlllnrdh Atrert ,Albert P. Vitraff _Mem, massar4usetts �RagmunD �(. �fneeneg REGULAR. MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD - DECEMBER 2. 1965 Chairman John M. Gray, Jr. , opened the meeting at 7:30 P.M. Members present besides Mr. Gray, included Mr. Albert Pitcoff, Mr. Michael Paskowski, and Mr. Raymond Sweeney. Reading of the minutes of the previous meeting was dispensed with, since each Member had received a copy prior to this meeting. Minutes approved. Copies of a proposed ordinance creating a Planning Department for the City had been distributed to the Members so they might be prepared to discuss the advantages and or disadvantages in adopting this Ordinance. This matter was discussed thoroughly, and it was decided to request further information on the advisability of creating such a department from the director of the Redevelopment Authority. . In response to a request from the Planning Board for information re- garding the erection of apartment buildings in the City of Beverly, a copy of their requirements had been received by this Board, and was read at this meeting. A letter to Langan, Dempsey & Murphy in answer to a request of theirs for information on several points regarding the new Zoning Ordinance as applicable to the property owned by the Metro Realty, Inc. , in the vicinity of the Salem State College was read. A report from City Engineer Neal B. Mitchell regarding the release of Lots #3 and #4 Dundee Street from a covenant was read at this meeting. Mr. Mitchell stated that in his opinion the covenant has not been sufficiently complied with, such that these lots may be released. An invitation to the Board to attend a meeting at the Health Center on Broad Street on Tuesday, December 7, at 4:30 P-M- was received. A second letter from Mr. Mitchell with a map showing the conserva- tion districts, was referred to Mr. Pitcoff who will conduct further research and present a report at the next meeting. This concluded the business presented at this meeting, and on motion duly made and seconded, it was • VOTED: - To adjourn at 8:50 P-M- Respectfully submitted, o. I- A' Clerk December 61 1965. REGULAR, MEETING OF THE, PLANNING BOARD - DECEMBER 2. 1965 Chairman John M. Gray, Jr., opened the meeting at 7130 P.M. Members pes resent bides Mr. Gray, included Mr. Albert Pitcoff, Mr. Michael Paskowski; and Mr, Raymond Sweeney, Reading of the minutes of the previous meeting was dispensed with, since each Member had received a copy prior to this meeting. Minutes approved, Copies of a proposed ordinance creating a Planning Department for the City had been distributed to the Members so they might be prepared to discuss the advantages and or disadvantages in adopting this Ordinance. This matter was discussed thoroughly, and it was decided to request further information on the advisability of creating such a department from the director of the Redevelopment A thorit Authority. In response to a request from the Planning Board for information re- garding the erection of apartment buildings in .the City of Beverly, a copy of their requirements had been received by this Board, and was read at this meeting. A letter to Langan, Dempsey & Murphy in answer to a request of theirs ,for information on several points regarding the new Zoning Ordinance :as applicable to the property owndd by the Metro Realty, Inc., in ''the vicinity of. the Salem State College was read. A report from City Engineer Neal B. Mitchell regarding the release of Lots #3 and ## Dundee Street from a covenant. was read at this meeting. Mr. Mitchell stated that in his opinion the covenant has not been sufficiently complied with, such that these lots may be released. An' invitation to the Board to attend a meeting at the Health Center on Broad Street on Tuesday,. December 7, at 4.130 PMo was received. A second letter from Mr. Mitchell with a map showing the conserva— tion districts, was referred to Mr. Pitcoff who will conduct further research and present a report at the next meeting. This concluded the business presented at this meeting, and on motion duly made and ,seconded, it was • VOTED". - To adJourn at $150 P.M, Respectfully submitted, er I I ,•� r .• iecember by 1965. , sa Salem Redevelopment 'Authority, r Old Town Hall, Derby Sqquare, S81emy Massachusetts. Gentlemen: A short white ago layer Collins conferred with the Planning . ' Board as to the advisatility of creating a Planning Depertment' for'. the City of Salem. He is requesting our advice in this matter, So that we,may explore all of the possibilities whether or , not the .Planning Department would be a department similar to other City departments, or whether it would ,be s,Planner working as s consultant, we would request our. Board meet with a representative of your Authority so that we may find out exactly what .the Federalr Government requires in order that .the City will be .eli ible for v 'would gg have sever— alvarious Federal funds'.:. . Tn.a11 obabil.it ou ha �' Pr' Yr Y al books and pamphlets in your office,. so that we would prefer to „ meet with you there*-, a . The only times we ' could not meet would be. the first and third Thursday of the month as that " ,our own.regularly scheduled meet _ ging dates Any other time: you have Mould be"acceptable in order to expedite this matter* In order to schedule this meeting for the earliest possible ' date, please call the Chairman. either at ,his office or at his homes a Very truly 'youro y ' .. ..- I 4jy • JMGtcc * Chairman �. ._ - - W �!�!�7c/reed Jfireefi, ��fe��i 021Od' NORTH SHORE TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE December 8, 1965 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers Peabody City Hall AGENDA 1. Welcome and introduction of participants Chairman, Francis E. Dolan • 2. Review of Interstate 95 Associate Commissioner John D. Warner, Department of Public Works 3. Discussion relative to MBTA service on the North Shore 4. Other business 5. Adjournment • t November 23r 1965. 4 City Planning Board, Beverly, Massachusetts. Gentlemen: We read with interest in the Salem Evening News d of your proposed code for apartment buildings. We ,} would be greatly obliged to you if you would forward ' a copy or copies ofthiscode to this Board, if such are available. M . . Very truly yours, • - JMG;cc SALEM PMMNTIIU ARS Chairman P gavomber 29,j 1965 TO-ALL BOARD MEMBERS : _ Enclodad io a copy of art OrdUduco crostlbs a Ploft aim Dopartmot for the Pity or "lent given to'jsa by- the yLeis Yovoro P16cso road- LhU da wo ray be ,in a pos-1tion to discuss it at' tho Thursi4y night mating. I told the r4yor I woo not in favor# and ho more or ' luoo oona 'oa No va , I would Ilk* your r dtiia„ Very trip youroINVS, e • - ml*r=n 7 • CITY OF SALEM An Ordinance CreatirE A Planning Department for the City of Salem:. SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT There is hereby established in the City of Salem a Planning Department to administer governmental and municipal functions and responsibilities in the field of city planning, to coordinate efforts directed toward the future development of the City, and to assure its continued improvement consistent with its physical, social and economic conditions and resources. SECTION 24 PERSONNEL The Pla ming Department shall consist of a Planning Director as • the head thereof, and such subordinate officers and employees as the City Council, with the advice of the Mayor, shall determine are necessary for the proper administration of the department. All appointments, including that of the Planning Director shall be made- by the Mayor. The salaries of,,all officers and employees of the Planning Department shall be regulated by ordinance. All positions, except that of the Planning Director, shall be subject to the provisions of General Laws, Chapter 31. The Planning Director shall have full charge of the work of his department and full supervision of the work of his planning and office staff; but, in the performane of his duties and responsibilities, he shall be directly responsible to and subject to the direction, authority and control of the Mayor. • (14) • SECTION 3. SELECTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR In selecting and appointing a Planning Director, the Mayor shall take into consideration the education, training, and experience of the applicants to perform the duties of the positions. The Mayor shall seek the advice of the Planning Board of the City of Salem in making the appointment, but shall not regard himself bound by their recommendation. SECTION 4. DUTIES OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR Consistent with the general purposes of section I hereof, the Plaming Director shall: (a) Plan, organize, an d direct the activities of professional technical, administrative and clerical personnel of the Planning Departments engaged in the compilation, analysis and interpretation of data pertaining to municipal planning. (b) Initiate and conduct studies of the resources, possi- bilities, and needs of the City and its metropolitan area. ( c) Prepare plane and recommendations for submission to the Mayor, (1) for the use of land for residential, commercial , industrial, recreational, and other purposes, (2) for controlling shif is of population, (3) for situating public and private ways, bridges, tunnels, parks, recreation facilities, public buildings, public utility services, public housing • projects, alum clearance and urban development and redevelopment projects, public garages and off. street parking RaVlities, and f • (4) for affording further facilities for the housing, transportation, employment, health, .safety, and general welfare of the population; (d) Act as technical adviser to the Mayor, City Council, Planning Board and other city agencies or officials on municipal planning matters. (e) Publish and distribute such copies of plans or reports as the Council may authorize in connection with plann- ing and development problems and policies• (f) Prepare and submit annually a long-range capital im- provement program for the City, including data as to the cost of each project recommended, relative pri- • orities of projects from an urgency and desirability standpoint, and the amounts that might be. available from borrowed funds, federal or state grants-in-aid or loans , special revenue and trust funds, accumulated surplus, and funds obtained from the annual tax levy, together with the estimated amounts returnable to the City by betterment assessments. i . (g) Prepare and administer the departmental budget. (h) Participate in the adminis tratio n of the zoning, sub- II; divisi.gn and other related ordinances. r (1) Confer with civic groups; prepare public relations pro- grams; participate in planning confere m es; speak to public gatherings. ( j) perform such other duties in the field of municipal ' • planning as the City Council may ordain or the Mayor direct. { (16) I SECTION LIAISON `,TI T:-? PLANNINCBOARD In addition to the duties and responsibilities set forth in section 4 hereof, the Plarning Director shall participate and cooperate with the Salem Planning Board in tize fulfillment of the Board' s responsibilities under the General Laws of Massa- chusetts and shall perform any and all functions of that Board as they may lawfully delegate to him with the consent of the Mayor. • • 117) r r,. X •tet/ o • CITY OF 5 ALEM An Ordinance Creating A Planning Depsrtment for the _ City of Salem: SECTION 1. ESTABL-1HHNT There is hereby esteblisY:ed in the City of Salem n Planning Department to administer governmental and municipal functions and responsibilities In the field of city planning, to coordinate efforts directed toward the .future development of the City, and to assure its continued improvement consistent with its physical, social and economic conditions and resources. SECTION 2. PLIRSONNEL • The Pla ming Department shall consist of a Planning Dirartor as the head thereof, and-such subordinate officers and employees as the City Council , with £he advice of tha Mayor, shall determine are necessary for the proper administration of the department. All appointments, including that of the Planning Director shall be made by the Mayor. . The salaries of`all officers and employees of the Planning, Department shall be regulated by ordinance. All positions, except that of the Planning Director, shall be subject to the provisions of General Laws, Chapter 31. The Planning Director shall have full charge of the work of�his department arra full supervision of the work of his planning end office staff; but, in the performan5 of his duties and responsibilities , he i!in�.J. b9 dl rest -ly �} �w'+stl,l f +n +�„ avl� ksut to the di.r°oeUt on, authority end contra ' Of t e,Cr> 1 y ; C_ • SECTIO SELVCT10N OP THE PIda?NI11C I)IT Rl r;'T0R In selecting, and appo.tnti.ng a Planning ;Director,. the Mayor shall take into consideration the education, training, and experience of the applicants to perform the duties of the positions , The Mayor shall seek the advice of the Planning Board of the City of Salem in making the appointment, but shall not regard himself bound by their recommendation, SECTION DUTIES Op .i H PLANNING NNING DIRECTOR Consistent with the general purposes of section I hereof, the Planning Director shall ; (a) Plan, organize, End direct the activities Of prafessiorad teehnical, .administrative and clerical personnel of the .: Planning Department, engaged in the compilation, analysis and interpretation of data pertaining to municipal planning. (b) Initiate and conduct studies of the resources, possi- bilities, and needs of the City and its metropolitan area, ( c) Prepare plana and recommendations for submission to the Mayor, (1) for the use of land for residential, commercial , industrial, recreational , and other purposes, (2) for controlling shifts of population, (3) for situating public and private ways, bridges, tunnels, parks, recre?�t.ton fracilities , public • buil.d:tngs, publi,;cr.util:i.ty services, public housing pr•ojeets, alum clearance and urban developrnenl; And redevelopment pro,jecta, public garar'r,sa EIrld ,, t• _ r,+ I,a'•�,is t. p ea,a ki n n t, P • (I� ) for affording further fnci.l:i.ties for the housing, transportation, employment, health, safety , and general welfsre of the population® (d) Act as technical adviser to the Mayor, City Council, Planning Board and other city agencies or officials on municipal planning matters. (e) Publish and distribute such copies of Plane or reports as the Council may authors e in oonnecticn wi"ttt plann- ing and development problems and policies . (f) Prepare and submit annually a long-Targe capital i:n- provement program for the City , including data as to the cost of each project recommended, relative pri- • orities of projects from an urgency and deei.rability standpoint, and the amounts that might be available from borrowed funds, federal or state grants-in-ald or loans , special revenue and trust funds, accumulated surplus, and funds obtained from the annual tax levy, together with the estimated amounts returnable to the City by betterment assesst"Onts . (g) Prepare and administer the departmental budget. (h) Participate in the adminis tration of the zoning, sub- divisl,gn and other related ordinances. (i) Confer with civic groups; prepare public relations pro grams ; participate in planning confereru es; speak to public gtrtherl,nfrs. ( j) perform such other duties in the field of muni cipal planning as the City Council may ordain or the; hta- yOr 4 � J (16) • . ^m *�r)r1RD Yn ,addition to the duties ar_d responotbilities set forth in aection 4 hereof, the Plarnir.g Directoz, shall Part_'cipate and cooperate with the Salem Planning Board in tze fulfillment of the Board' s responsibilities under the aenOr.al Laws of Massa- chusette and shall perform any and a" I functions cf that Board as they may lawfully delegate to him with the consent of the Mayor. • Jr _ a November 26, 1965. Mr, James M• Langan Langan, Dempsey & Murphy; • :" , 41 Tremont Street, $10 Boston Building, Boston, Massachusetts 0210$ Dear Mi•. Langan:. The following is inanswer to your letter of November 2, 1965":' • Question No. l: Insofar as I know, no request was, ever,made by any individual, company: or corporation to change the zoning .of the area of the land owned by the Metro, ' Realty Co. ., Question` No.< 2:• The change was proposed by the Planning, Board• as it , was felt that. a very serious mistake was made when , • this general area was rezoned for Apartments in 1955.' The area, at-that time; was rezoned merely to take `care of- the Veterans! Housing Project. However, for ` drafting-ptu^poses, . the area .was extended to be paral- lel •wi.th the surrounding streets. The Planning Board- feels that apartments are a detriment to this general area and they are of no value to- the City• Question No. .G 'It teas not known by $he PlanningpBoard that the Massa— chusetts College in Salem intended to acquire property 3 in the general area surrounded by the following streets.: Raymond Road; Raymond Avenue,, Loring Avenue, Lafayette .• Street. s " . &ven at this,date,' we have no idea and the State College Authorities have no idea what the eventual-development of the College will ber, Insofar as. the land of the Metro Realty Company is .coneerned, we have never seen -any plans whatsoever, and other than descriptiont-given at the var— ious times in the local newspapers, we,have only a gener- • . al .idea where the property is located. 5 4 � t Question No. 4. 'No notice was given to the Metro Realty Co., as-the . r`a- zonin and -Zoning µ Ordinance adopted in 1965 was 8 ener- x. al revision of the entire Ordinance and Map pertaining to the entire City. Various formal and informal hearings ` were held by the Planning Board, starting in 1963 and extending up until the early Summer 1965. These hear- ings were all open to the public and .we might say, at this time, any time real problems were presented to=-us; ' > some equitable way was worked out between an individual s and the Planning Board so that the City, as a whole would benefit. No special notices were sent to any in- dividual as ample notice was given in the newspapers. If you have any further questions, please let-us know.- F Saincerelyiyours, ` -' ,_ . • JMG:cc + r Chairman p n a 0 ' JOHN M . G RAY CO . R E G I S T E R E D A R C H I T E C T S �A JOHN M.GRAY, F.A.t.A. 153 MILK STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109 JOHN M. GRAY,JR.A.I.A. FRANCIS J.GRAY. M.C.P. Area Code 617 426-4993 November 24, 1965 Mrs. Christine Callahan Building Inspector's Office City Hall S31emp Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Callahan: Please retype the enclosed letter on our stationery • and send it to Mr. James M. Langan, Langan, Dempsey and Murphy. Please keep a copy of the correspondence together with the letter from Mr. Langan for your files. Sincerely yours, JOHN M. GRAY CO. John M, Grays Jr. • Mr. Jadies M. Langan Langans -Dempsey "and Murphy • Attorneys..at Law 41 Tremont Street Boston, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Langan: The following is in answer to your letter of November 2, 1965: Question No. 1: Insofar as I know, no request was ever made by any individual, company or corporation to change the zoning of the area of the land owned by the Metro Realty Co. Question No. 2: The change was proposed by the Planning Board as it was felt that a very serious mistake was made when this general area was re— zoned for Apartments in 1955. The area, at that time, was rezoned merely to take care of the Veterans' Housing Project. However, for drafting purposes, the area was extended to be parellel with the surrounding streets. The Planning Board feels that apartments are a detriment to this general area and they are of no value to the Ci ty. Question No. 3: It was not known by the Planning Board that the Massachusetts College in Salem intended to acquire property in the general area surrounded by the following streets: • Raymond Road, Raymond Avenue, Loring Avenue and Lafayette Street. Even at this date, we have no idea and the State College Authorities have no idea what the eventual development of the College will be. Insofar as the land of the Metro Realty Company is concerned, we have never seen any plans-whatsoever, and other than descriptions given-.&t the various times in the local newspapers, we have only a general idea where the property is located. Question No. 4: No.notice was given to the Metro Realty Co., as the rezoning and Zoning Ordinance adopted in 1965 was. a general revision of the entire Ordinance and Map pertaining to the entire City. Various formal and informal hearings were held by the Planning Board start— ing in 1963 and extending up until the early Summer — 1965. These Hearings were all open to the public and we might say, at this time, any time real problems were presented to us, some equitable way was worked out between an individual and the Planning Board so that the City, as a whole, would benefit. No special notices were sent to any individual as ample notice was given in the newspapers. If you have any further questions, please ldt us know. Sincerely yours, • JMGJR:TAB John M. Gray, Jr. Was this letter overlooked at last night's meeting, or is it something you intend to •old for a while? If you plan to answer it, you could make a pencil copy and return it to me, and I will type it and send it off. C. Callahan i LANGAN. DEMPSEY & MURPHY ATTORNEYS AT LAW • 41 TREMONT STREET CAPITOL 7-7215 Bio BOSTON BUILDING JAMES M. LANGAN DANIEL J. DEMPSEY BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS O21OS PATRICK F. MURPHY EDWARD P. DELANEY November 2, 1965 Planning Board City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: This office represents the Metro Realty Inc. who own a piece of land on Lafayette Street in Salem adjacent to property used by the Massachusetts College at Salem. I have been informed that recently action was taken by the Zoning Board that changed the property owned by the Metro Realty Inc. from an apartment house zone to a residential zone. • I would like the following information: 1. Was a request made by any individual, company or corporation to change the area owned by the Metro Realty Inc. from an apartment house district to a residential district? 2. Who proposed such a change? 3. Was it known by the Zoning Board that the Massachusetts College at Salem intended to take the property of the Metro Realty Inc. for purposes of the school in the form of dormitories or other uses? 4. Was any notice given to the Metro Realty Inc. of any proposed change of the land owned by them from an apartment house district to a residential area? I would appreciate an answer from the Board. Very truly yours, James M. Lang n� • jml:ea November 26, 1965• ' Mr. James M. Langa Langan, Dempsey && Murphy, , 41 Tremont Street, . 810 Boston Building, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Dear bar. Langan.- The angan:The following is in answer to your letter of. November 20 19653' Question No. 1: Insofar as I know, no request was ever made by any individual, company or corporation. to change the zoning of the area of the land owned by the Metro Realty Co Question No,* 23 The change was proposed by the Planning Board as it was felt that a very serious mistake was made when this general area was rezoned for Apartments in 1 P 955.. The area, at that time, was rezoned merely to take !' care of the Veterans' Housing Project* However, for drafting purposes, the area was extended to be paral= lel with the surrounding streets* The Planning Board feels that apartments are a detriment to this general area and they are of no value to the City, Question Not 3: It was not known by the Planning Board that the Massa— chusetts College in Salem intended to acquire property in -the general area surrounded by the following streets: Raymond-Road, Raymond Avenue, Loring Avenue, Lafayette Street. Even at, this date, we have no idea and the State College Authorities have no idea what the eventual development of the College will be* Insofar as the land of the Metro Realty Company is concerned, we have never seen any plans whatsoever, and other than descriptions given at the var— ious times in the local newspapers, we have only a gener- al idea where the property is located. �� . . 2 a Westion No. : No ,notice was given to the Metro Realty Co.,. as .the_ re- zoning and Zoning Ordinance adopted in' 1965 -was a genera al revision of the entire Ordinance and Map pertaining_ . to the entire City. Various formal and informal hearings were held by the. Planning' Board starting in 1963 and a extending up until the early Summer - 1965. These hear., ings were all open to the public and we might say, ,at -this time,` any time real problems were presented to us, : . some equitable way was worked out between an individual r. and the Planning Board so that the City, as .a whole, 'would benefit.. No special notices were sent to any in- dividual as ample notice was given in the newspapers. , If 'you.,have any further questions, please let us.know. Sincerely yours,. { JMO:cc > hntif Chairman U - LI t s .. Poarb of Pealth 2 �. �Rttplttn, IAEf. �., (IIhttixmttn mm 5 Proab Street illiam jG. j9Nal�one�, Jr. �PI�n y. QIPPntQ� rn �`Smf 3asr 4 �R. �Ric4axb December 1, 1965 The Planning Board City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Gentlemen: The Board of Health cordially invites you to be present at a special meeting to be held at the Health Center, 5 Broad Street on Tuesday, December 7 at 4:30 P. M. The Board has some general and particular concerns relative to the procedures and control, and also the establishment of a better • liaison between various departments and others concerned with building generally and building developments, particularly. 6 n As one who is vitally concerned with this problem, the Board hopes that you may be present at this time. Very truly yours, .FO THE B TH JOHN J�TOOMEY, D S.C. Health Age T/h of DEC Z 9 1S AN '65 Flanning CITY CLERP;'S OFFICE SALEM. MASS. 34 (Qhnrrlj Streef FORMA Salem, ttssscljusefts APPLICATION FOR ENDORSEMENT OF PLAN BELIEVED NOT TO REQUIRE APPROVAL File one completed form with the Planning Board and one copy with the City Clerk in accordance with the requirements of Section II-B. Salem, Mass., ---- __________December_2___.......... 1965__ To the Planning Board: The Undersigned, believing that the accompanying plan of his property in the City of Salem does not con- stitute a subdivision within the meaning of the Subdivision Control Law because (see Sect. II-A) it---is .-a-- r-esubdivision of lotspreviously-_-approv-ed__on__Apr _l il_ ,_ 1965--------------- -- --------- - -------- - -------- - ----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- and herewith submits said plan for a determination and endorsement that Planning Board approval under the Subdivision Control Law is not required. • 1. Name of Applicant ------------Salem_-Aeres- _-Ino------------------------------------------------------------------------ Address __________________57 Hancock_Street---------Ev_erett_,__Massachusetts-------------- 2. Name of Engineer or Surveyor----Carter___&__Towers—_ En_g._-Corp__________________________________________ Address -_5-_Fairview__Avenue_,___ lwampscott_,___Massachu_setts_____ 3. Deed of property records in _> s_sex_ ;ou_thi?is6rict_______________Registry Book _5270------------- Page --$2 - 4. Location and Description of Property- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ____________________G�11 a vHi17 IiQ2 d19e�tesl.__insut�tl ivies ipn__og_l �l___en ti_tl �l_,_ ---------------------------------------------------------I4 _tch Ft__He i gh t _------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SALEM ACRES, I by its Attorn .Signature of--Awt -------- -- Ge or GeorP. Vallis , Attorse Address TRU of �$ttlem, Massar4uzetto • ';a p Department of ?public pmhs cN�E NEAL B. MITCHELL CITY ENGINOEF December/0 ,1965. Salem Planning Board 34 Church Street Salem, Mass . Re: Witchcraft Heights Gentlemen: In reference to a plan (revised) of Gallows Hill Road, from station 6 plus 0 to station 12 plus 0, dated October 2571965, please be advised that, in my opinion, there is no discordance with the requirements set up by the Planning Board for this subdivision. My opinion is based solely on the parts of the works that can • be observed at this time. Mr . Joseph Carter , engineer for the developer , assures me that the portions of the works that cannot be observed at this time are properly installed. Very truly yours, Neal B. Mitchell City Engineer • G _ J�ie Z�ommo�cr�ecc�� a���Za�ac�i� • _ - ��ax�m�2� a�T�ammexce ani �er�e�afimnire� 750 Vauieway Awed 4oj4x 02776 T . W. SCHUINBERG 523-6640 ' COMMISSIONER PLM„SE NOTE: On or after November 19th, the Department of Commerce and Development will be located at our new quarters in the State Office Blzilding at 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, 02202. At the time of the Department's move, our present telephone system will be converted to the new CENTREX SYSTEBI OF DIRECT INWARD DIALING. Personnel may be contacted direct at their respective phone numbers after our move date, as indicated below: PHONE • Commissioner: T. W. Schulenberg 727-3218 Bureau of Administration 727-3221 Chief Counsel 727-3227 Division of Economic Development 727-3206 ';;'omen's Bureau 727-3210 Division of Housing 727-3244 Bureau of Construction Services 727-3251 Bureau of Project Development Services 727=247 Bureau of Property Hanagement Services 727-3256 Bureau of International Trade 727-3234 Bureau of Planning Assistance 727-3197 Bureau of Area Planning 727-3197 Bureau of Public Relations 727-3232 Bureau of Research and Statistics 727-3212 Science and Technology Representative 727-3228 Division of Tourism 727-3204 Bureau of Vacation/Travel 727-3201 Division of Urban Renevial 727-3236 Bureau of Community Programs 727-3238 Bureau of Financial Assistance 727-3240 Please post and duplicate for ,your records. Harry Hartog • Director of Administrative Services : fat#g of �$alem Cttssae ixu##s �° Planning 19uttrd �Jnhn M. f�rng, �Jr. December 17, 1965. Gernla Q. 009artim ,91Hichnrl Pnskofnski 34 Qlhurrll 15trzet ,Albert X12. Vitroffnlem, InssnchuseSfs t n�monk . Rurrnru REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD - DECEMBER 16, . 1965 The meeting was opened at 7:32 P.M. by Chairman John M. Gray. Also in attendance were Mr. Paskowski, Mr. McCarthy, and Mr. Pitcoff. As the first order of business, a motion was made and seconded to approve minutes of the last meeting. A letter from Roy F. Weston, Inc., (Environmental Science and En- gineering Consultants, 4 St. Albans Avenue, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania) was read. This referred to historic preservation as included in "701" urban planning assistance program. It was felt that this letter would be of more interest to Mr. John • Barrett of the Redevelopment Authority, and the Board voted to forward it to his office. A communication from the Department of Commerce and Development concerning a new Centrex System of Direct Inward Dialing for contacting personnell at their new quarters was presented for future reference in reaching individuals in their respective de- partments. A pamphlet outlining new books of interest to Planning Boards was received, and it was voted to order two of these volumes, "Shopping Towns U.S.A." and"Townscape" to add to the Library of the Planning Board. Salem Acres, Inc. , through their attorney George Vallis, presented a letter from Neal B. Mitchell, City Engineer, stating that in his opinion, there is no discordance with the requirements set up by the Planning Board for subdivision in Witchcraft Heights develop- ment. This concluded the business brought before the Board, and it was VOTED: to Adjourn at 8 :45 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, Clerk JOHN M . G R A Y CO . ^Mp�aTM QJAI REGISTERED ARCH IT EC TS . „... a . '” JOHN M. GRAY, F.A.I.A. JOHN M. GRAY, JR.A.1.A. 153 MILK STREET • BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109 FRANCIS J.GRAY, M.C.P. Area Code 617 426-4993 December 17, 1965 Mrs. Christine Callahan Building Inspector' s Office City Hall Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mrs. Callahan: In accordance with the wishes of the Board last night, I intend to have a Dinner Meeting at the Hawthorne Hotel on Thursday, December 30th at 6:30 P.M. Kindly notify the following, using the format as noted below: Mr. & Mrs. Michael Paskowski Mr. & Mrs. Daniel J. O'Brien, Jr. 20 Bow St., Salem, Mass. 24 Ord Street — Salem, Mass. Mr. & Mrs. Raymond F. Sweeney 18 Chandler Rd., Salem, Mass. Mr. & Mrs. Albert R. Pitcoff 38 Dearborn St., Salem, Mass. Mr. & Mrs. Gerald T. McCarthy 6 Lauell St., Salem, Mass. Mr. & Mrs. Theodore A. Callahan 5 Brown Street, Salon, Mass. Invitations to read as follows: "The Planning Board will hold a Dinner Meeting on Thursday — December 30, 1965 at 6:30 P.M., at the Hawthorne Hotel. Mr. &rs. are cordially invited to this informal dinner. Sin 7W yq 67 s," Sign the invitations in my name. (J inerely yours, E f o M. Gray, Jr.,,, tab = -December 23, 1965. - Hon. Francis X* Collins', r City Hall, , Salem, - Massy Dear Mayor Collins! - A short while ago, a'draft Of'<an Ordinance to create aPlan- ning Department for the City-was presented to the Planning Board for purposes of .Report and Recommendations. This draft has been thoroughly examined by the Planning Board,'", Several inquiries by the .Board have been made'-in other towns and cities purported to have Planning Departments. Planning Board mem- bers of the other communities have been consulted. Also, Planning Consultants have .been contacted for their views. , r As proposed, this Department would be: a separate City Depart-menti responsible only to the Mayor and to a lesser degree, to the - Council and the Planning card* The duties empowered to the planner as a ,whole, have already been given .to the-planning board under the "Planning Law" Chap. 41 G.L* Sections 81-A to 91-.J. Sections 81*A andB authorize the functions of the Hoarde Section 81-+C requires the Planning Board-to make. studies and plans, and submit them to the City-Council, make.an annual report, 'make a master plan, and pass on <: . sub-division plots. -lection 81-D :authorizes>& master plan which has already been completed* !Under section 81-E.- an official ma is au- thorized+ We hope. to start on this projectain the near future* sec- '. ' t 8 - ion 1 F authorizes and delegates the usage of an official map. This map is limited to public .ways, public parts and certain defined private ways.: in short, the Planning Hoard is already authorized by existing` legislation to do what the proposed -Planning Department should do and is fullfilling its responsibility,.: To date, very few municipalities in Massachusetts have created a Planning Department as such. It is ,a matter of record that most , of these Departments have not been able to function too well because. of lace of qualified personnell* On checking with Mr. Barrett, the Executive-Director of the Salem Redevelopment Authority, we found there is no prerequisite from the Federal Government that insibts on Planning Departments being created so that a municipality would be eligible for Feder- al Grants. The only thing the Federal Government requires is a#- idence of qualified professional assistance, which can be, obtained F by consultants. To create w Planning Department-, a budget of $25,000.00 to , $30,000.00 minimum yearly would be necessary+ As an alternative, at least for a start of such a programme, we are recommedning that the Planning Board be authorised to retain professional planners -as consultants for general citslannin at this time It would , uld , be our intention of hiring thee consulants on a per-diem basis. i We would recommend that ,a sum of $6,00000 be added •to our or gin- al 1966 Planning Board Bidget request of $2200.00,# making a total . , of $8200400 for ouir' requested 1966 Budget w r r Verytruly yours, as , y sT1 OIG I cc "' • rman > � z r RE: PROPOSED PLANNING DEPARTMENT Salem, Mass. ...Francis X. Collins City Hall Salem, Mass. Dear Mayor Collins: A short while ago, a draft of an Ordinance to create a Planning Department for the City was presented to the Planning Board for purposes of Report and Recommendations. This draft has been thoroughly examined by the Planning Board. Several inquiries by the Board have been made in other towns and cities purported to have Planning Departments. Planning Board members of the other cohmunities have been consulted. Also Planning Consultants have been contacted for their views. As proposed, this Department would be a separate city department responsible only to the Mayor and to a lesser degree to the Council and the Planning Board. The duties empowered to the planner as a vh ole, have already been giving to the PlanningBoard under "The Planning Law" Chap. 41 G.L. Sections 81—A to 81—J. Sections 81—A and B authorize the functions of the Board. Section 81—C requires the Planning Board to make studies and plans and submit them to the City Council, make an annual report, make a master plan and pass on sub— division plots. Section 81—D authorizes a master plan which has already been completed. Under Section 81—E, an official map is authorized. We hope to start on this project in the near future. Section 81—F authorizes and delegates the usage of an official map. This map is limited to public ways, public parts and certain defined private ways. • In short, the Planning Board is already authorized by existing legislation to do what the proposed Planning Department should dog u„w ii { //�//ihj 1q.1, },J/►usJ2l,/, , To date, very few municipalities in Massachusetts have created a Planning Department as such. It is a matter of record that most of these Departments have not been able to function too well because of lack of qualified personnel. On checking with Mr. Barrett, the Executive—Director of the Salem Redevelop — ment Authority, we found there is no prerequisite from the Federal Government that insists on municipality d eligible r Federal rants. Planning Departments be created so that a u icipality woul be eligi 1 fo e 1 G The only thing the Federal Government requires is evidence of qualified professional assistance, which can be obtained by consultants. To create a Planning Department, a budget of $25,000.00 to $30,000.00 minimum yearly would be necessary. , As an alternative, at least for a start of such a programme, we are recommending that the Planning Board be authorized to retain professional planners as consultants for general city planning at this time. It would be our intention of hiring these consultants on a per—diem basis. We would recommend tha t a sum of $6,000.00 be added to our original 1966 planning board budget request of making a total of $ for our IM requested 1966 Budget. GhnA� • � � 1 .. w� ���: ; �- . a • Y��,�.r -a ��� .�•. R a � y h(• p - x ww� s r. }L l ,�''$`ter^ s ,,yy"��'� s �����... 9�'�" �€ '� �'• '* a,�'y `, i� '"�.e ,� '� r a,(y,*yL+•G� �l r S.Lq,>�y *, k* 7 �. � xx 9 F 44 a S)) vt lip. IDS i lip Iry t + k A i 1 r c �J•j' 'r �v 1 Fj n 1 I � , � � � b `' �n� ✓ /n,�Oosc,��Z �s-�i�'Line I .eco%.'�� = yt;/r: ✓�..�✓�% i . YN Of *� W\ r '•. !wr », I } '� 4. '� @ �r .y, * f ems.* •� Y-��k q.g .w�£; "m:� 5x5 n. i a - k .r �