10 WOODSIDE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 10 W00DSIDE STREET
II
1
� ���os
--------------
17'-0"
ATTIC FLR. 3 13/4" X 117/8" LVLS BEAM
3
J
0 �
LL
0
i n �
9 0 x 2-13/4" x 5 1/2"
2ND. FLR. Jo 2-1 3/ " X 9 1/4" LVLS-BEAM X 2'-0" LVL REINF.
_
2-13/4" x 5 1/2" LL OF EXIST.EACH SIDE
X 2'-0" LVL REINF. o OXIST. BEAM)
J
(1 @ EACH SIDE p O8
OF EXIST. BEAM) x uLL
LL
NOTE:BOLT LVLS
WITH 5/8" DIA.
x x
STL. THRU. BOLTS,
1ST. FLR._ a NUTS,F.W.S @ 1'-6" O.C.
J J J
O O O Z
J
_>j
J O
« BASEMENT a "v "v CENTER-LINE ELEVATION
1-4 DE P X 2'-0" FOR PROP. BEAMS &COLUMNS
AT 10 WOODSIDE ST.,SALEM,MA
R"Cl��
5„o 3 SQUA�E PORT.
CEM. CONC. FOOT. SCALE:1/4"=1' 7/13/05
�'.
(W/ # 4 REBAR @ 4" AK STRUCT. ENG.
O.C.,BOTH WAYS,BOT.)- PEABODY,MA
TYPICAL
r
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACFI ET;TVLEI1. F9A
BOARD OF APPEAL
CLERK-S OFFICE
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 [[
STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 ZO05 JUN -2 P 2, 33-
MAYOR
3MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHRISTOPHER CASEY REQUESTING A SPECIAL
PERMITNARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10 WOOKSIDE STREET R2
A hearing on this petition was held on May 18, 2005 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Dionne, Edward Moriarty, Steven Pinto, Robin Stein and Nicholas
Halides. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit per Section 8-4 and a Variance from lot are per
dwelling to convert a single family dwelling to a 2 family for the property located at 10
Woodside Street located in an R-2 zone.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6
and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming
structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land structures, and used, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement
or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by
the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that
the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board
that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting the lands, buildings or
structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHIRSTOPHER CASEY REQUESTING A SPECIAL
PERMITNARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10 WOODSIDE STREET R2
page two
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing and after reviewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. Christopher Casey appeared and presented the petition.
2. Mr. Casey, who is the owner and also a developer, would like to convert this single
family home to a two family dwelling.
3. If the relief is granted it would reduce the number of bedrooms from seven (7) to four
(4).
4. A number of neighbors appeared and voiced their concerns about the change to a
two family. The main concerns were regarding parking issues and the added traffic
to the neighborhood.
5: Councillor Michael Bencal and Councillor Pellitier appeared and opposed this petition
noting the density of the neighborhood.
6. The Board Members found no hardship to stand behind this petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board
Of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would not involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the ordinance.
4. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the
neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 0 in favor and 5 in opposition to the motion
to grant the relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes required
to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit and Variance is
denied.
Variance & Special Permit Denied
May 18, 2005 Edward Moriarty �C
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, is any shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter
40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of
the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification
of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such
appeal have been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is
recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANIES
3/3/98
Building Inspectors Office
1 Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
insured:Charles and Helen Williams'
Property Address: 10 Woodside Street
Policy #: FBSH20431
Loss of : 02/23/98
Claim # OBF-01477S
Claim has been made involving loss, damage or destruction of the above-
captioned property, which may either exceed $1000 or cause Massachusetts
General Laws, Chapter 143, Section 6 to be applicable. If any notice under
Massachusetts General laws, Chapter 139, Section 3B is appropriate, please
direct it to the attention of this writer and include a reference to the above-
captioned insured, location, policy number, date of loss and claim number.
Title: Senior Property Claims Adjuster.
On this date, I caused copies of this notice to be sent to the persons named
above at the address indicated above by first class mail.
Signature:
Southern New England Property Claim Center • P.O.Box 9055 • Boston,MA 02205-9055
Telephone: (800)284-6730
Fax: (508)549-8558 & AT&T Fax(Reporting Losses):(800)804-0517