Loading...
119 WEBB STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 114 WEBB STREET I ©���OQGITG STREET PERMIT N2 ZQ J,�,cnnniti'4i atrm (t1ltlirr of 11uaprrinr of Vuildinga l�Ff.11nV FVi� City Hall, __Ge a a 19 CSr `Permission is hereby given to to occupy for purposes in front of estate� Wd. 62.�of sidewalk, of street. `Chis permit is limited to �77,le 19!k2subject to the provisions of the ordinances and statutes in relation to Streets and the Inspection and Construction of Buildings in the City of Salem. / I Director of Public Services Inspector of Buildings Signature of Applicant rc24 zc a.za.ee �J (Citi of ttlPm, _ HttssttcliusPtf "71 'Botts of rAupettl 91 MAY -1 A8 :33 CITY " ✓' DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HAYDEN SAFE & LOCK CO..-(-PETIT-IONEg�-J-�P.K'c ., FICE, ROBERT & MURIEL ROULEAU (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCES AT 119 WEBB ST. (-R2) '%' A hearing on this petition was held April 17, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Edward Luzinski, Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners are requesting a variance from use in order to allow the structure at 119 Webb St. to be used as a safe and lock company. The property is located in a Residential Two Family Zone (R-2) and is owned by Robert and Muriel Rouleau. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Petitions in favor of the proposed use were submitted by the petitioner. 2. A letter of support from the Salem Chamber of Commerce was submitted. 3. Support was voiced by neighbors, abutters and others. 4. Building has been used for business purposes for many years. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HAYDEN SAFE & LOCK COMPANY (PETITIONER) , ROBERT & MURIEL ROULEAU (OWNERS) , FOR VARIANCE AT 119 WEBB ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 2. Parking be provided as per the plans submitted. 3. Petitioner obtain any and all necessary permits from the Salem Building Dept. VARIANCE GRANTED April 17, 1991 ichard A. Benca1, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date.of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Macs. General Laws, Ch:ipter 8O8, Section 11, the Variance or r;-:vat Permit grante9 he,efn shall nut take effect untll a copy Of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Ciei k that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and Indexed under the name or the owner of record it Is recorded and noted sn the owner's Certificate of Titl6. BOARD OF APPEAL A � tn-< I. o a r:-J co n� rn W w The Hanover Insurance Companies © The Hanover Insurance Company ❑ Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company Bond No. LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, Walsh Gef1strttetien C30frtpetny 1,1U. of 1 4.L.Turnpike Street, Rc)wley, MA as Principal, and E�The Hanover Insurance Company (A New Hampshire Corporation) ❑Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (A Massachusetts Corporation) as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Salem, Massachusetts as Obligee, in the penal sum of One Thousand ($1, 000 . 00) Dollars, good and lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, and our heirs, executors, administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS the said Principal has applied to said Obligee for a license to. . . .for• -sidewalk- - - - - P.ermit. . .at. .1.19. Webb. . . Street. . .,. Salem. . . , . . . .MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if Principal shall faithfully observe and honestly comply with the provisions of all Laws or Ordinances of Obligee regulating the business for which license is issued, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue. PROVIDED, THE LIABILITY OF THE SURETY upon this bond shall be and remain in full force and effect for the full period of the license, and renewals thereof, issued to the principal above named, or until ten days after receipt by the Obligee of a written notice signed by such Surety, or its authorized agent, stating that the liability of such Surety is thereby terminated and canceled; and provided further, that nothing herein shall affect any rights or liabilities which shall have accrued under this bond prior to the date of such termination. Signed, sealed and dated the . . . . . . .17th . . . . . . . . . . . day of . . . .June . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19. . .88 Walsh .Construc.t.ion. Company, . iric. . . . . . . n Principal r` r � 7 .Seal) By,. . �,c (lflf*�*abbs L GG}} HE AN VER INSURANCE COMPANY C1 MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY By . . ::✓. ' 1" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O n , .G r Hare Attorney-in-tact Form 141-0761 (1/84) - The Hanover Insurance Company POWER OF ATTORNEY CERTIFIED COPY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Hampshire,does hereby constitute and appoint John F. O 'Hare, Barbara A. Burke and/or Barbara A. Brown — of Danvers, Massachusetts, and each is its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-fact to sign, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver for, and on its behalf, and as its act and deed, at any place within the United States,or,if the following line be filled in,only within the area therein designated any and all bonds, recognizances, undertakings, contracts of indemnity or other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,as follows: Any such obligations in the United States, in any amount, - - - - - And said Company hereby ratifies and confirms all and whatsoever said Attorney(s)-in-fact may lawfully do in the premises by virture of these presents. This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of said Company at a meeting held on the seventh day of October, 1981, a quorum being present and voting,which resolution is still in effect: "RESOLVED,That the President or any Vice President,in conjunction with any Assistant Vice President, be and they are hereby authorized and empowered to appoint Attorneys-in-fact of the Company,in its name and as its acts, to execute and acknowledge for and on its behalf as Surety any and all bonds,recognizances, contracts of indemnity, waivers of citation and all other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,with power to attach thereto the seal of the Company.Any such writings so executed by such Attorneys-in-fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company in their own proper persons." IN WITNESS WHEREOF,THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be sealed with its corporate seal,duly attested by its Vice President and its Assistant Vice President,this 18th day of June 1982 T EH RANCE COMPANY ..... ... ..... .......... tee President ...... ... ...... , ..r.. .... (Seal) Assistice P . resident THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COUNTY OF WORCESTER ss. On this 18th day of June 1982 before me came the above named Vice President and Assistant Vice President of The Hanover Insurance Company, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described herein, and acknowledged that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the corporate seal of The Hanover Insurance Company and that the said corporate seal and their signatures as officers were duly affixed and subscribed to said instrument by the authority and direction of said Corporation. w (Seal) ... .... Public / �I�� My Commission Expires May 31, 1985 1, the undersigned Assistant Vice President of The Hanover Insurance Company, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full,true and correct copy of the Original Power of Attorney issued by said Company,and do hereby further certify that the said Power of Attorney is still in force and effect. This Certificate may be signed by fascimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of The Hanover Insurance Company at a meeting held on the 7th day of October, 1981 "RESOLVED, That any and all Powers of Attorney,and Certified Copies of such Powers of Attorney and certification in respect thereto,granted and executed by the President or any Vice President in conjunction with any Assistant Vice President of the Company shall be binding on the Company to the same extent as if all signatures thereon were manually affixed even though one or more of any such signatures thereon,may be facsimile." . - ' r . GIVEN under my hand and the seal of said Company,at Worcester,Massachuseit�,thi, 17 day 7- day of 19 SFr / s FORM 111-0402 NS(11181) Assistant Vice resident RECIFIliEU MAY C ii; Cy Am '15 r (9RU of 5alEm, aseadjuns t A Cif urrlCE s Poarb Df Mfg SALEM, MASS. APRIL 25, 1979 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT J. ROULEAU, WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO. ,119 WEBB STREET (R-2 DISTRICT). A hearing on this Petition was held on April 25, 1979, with the following Board Members present: James Boulger, Chairman, Jane Lundregan, Douglas Hopper, John Nutting and Associate Members Joseph Piemonte and Edward Luzinski. Notices were sent to abutters and others, and duly published in the Salem Evening News on April 11 and 18, 1979 in accordance with Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808. Mr. Rouleau represented himself before the Board. The petitioner is requesting an extension of an existing non-conforming use at 119 Webb Street, by the erection of a twelve foot high storage building for construction material. The neighborhood is a residential one. The petitioner's business has been located in the area for several years. The petitioner is presently storing construction materials in the yard at 119 Webb Street, and he wishes to be able to put these materials under cover. Several abutters appeared in opposition to the granting of.the variance. The abutters felt that the erection of an additional commercial structure in the residential zone would be detrimental to their property values. They also felt that the construction of the building would be aesthetically unpleasant. The Board voted to deny the petition. The Board found that it could not grant said request without substantial detriment to the surrounding neighborhood, and without derogating from the intent of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The Board found that the extension of the non-conforming use would undermine the property values of the surrounding property. VARIANCE DENIED y APPEAL FROM THIS DECISIOtl, IF ANY, SHALL 6E i U�oE PiIRS:.'A'1T TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. / /11 GENERAL (LAWS. CHAPTER C93, AGD S3'•.V. c_ .�. .. .. �, _ ._: 7HE DATE OF FILING Jai6 T. Lundregan OF THIS DECISION 1:1 TFE i.-N-,2- Secretary� � - �� � - PL'RS.Am TO -7S3.'r.: ..'-A ljwc Li(�'j7'i�/+ /t ..` N 7hEV%4Rv9loe `"-CIAL PER-MIT. GRANTED HES:EiB. SHALL '' t :BP.EE=�fc�?"i;'N`UL-Kv..1��=R FNLEOS, :a' T:IE CERT: FICATION 0'r iR: Clef C:.ai$ i14aj�L J9)'L NA6'� 6L1jl.°.c'49 n,v D FILED, OR THAT, IF SUGH N! Al:`J.', jYHt+13£cn','iL E6.jHHT.ij NiJ�.(SG-�n.Jfn+&:d;:'ilE7 IS . RECORDED IN THE SUUiH ES E:: "EG✓'J��=Y L��'t tl�ii+nD irgpXC" D:RT4he-I>ic OF THE OYlf1ER _ OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND W,1:0 VF Idh or6C_i: n /,.: i iii LE. BOARD OF APPM • ,.i - A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.