Loading...
82 WEBB STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 2 Ee) ST �E2 Ctoll o �- I- 13 17 L 5 I1o .19 5 "Q 1 STREET = c VE tzT i F `f T H A-r -r t-1� 12s u i 1_t> s 6F R1gss�. z GERALD RALPH S 1"T t_s ATS p ON Z H E S tTE AS 5t-lCStil N MARSELLA 0; No, 28720 Sc—= P?'i=—: r-�gE'R, -7, t9i�a4 9.. SUR`1!� z � D 472 13' ( �q 10 - � x 4 n r of M A �SSHc r, v 5 c.r.f 3 1 1 yJr� 35 c:5 L5�� UGE>r 1982 r1ru , ✓, uo.n G. OT fa 4. r- A i,rJCcf' ` '7 5Go �+i:wt�KY r M ,s, hvF1 I-or de % a gee i li^, r JOOt LO7" w trTt N( Ax i Vems( C-c"r GcaUe:(ACr;= � ihl P F3 OF e- C> T 1 r < [} in Mlrx + rtU+ 1' 41IpTN a � J� tDt:' VC2t� �ar MtUtMU �'+ I?EG'TN or- �EGrc yAt20 ��-; . q , }Jp, O r= S Ton` t U.✓ 4 i r+� hxt � � "1 rr u r o � >~E r�t✓G 5 tb i OIJ } r_ PowE� Co. ew Et`'Gkl--a.ND _ i i i tL N a(F `- W 'N 3' LLID 11 1 — CT Z Q GJEBB STRE-ET = CEFZTIFY THAT THE FOUNDA- -ICM AT SZ- IWEBB ST2EET, SALEM IS SITUATED ON THE SITE AS SHOWN . F: SCA L E I"= Zo` MAY 9, 1984 • t,a { VARIANCE &R -ANTED FEB • 8, 1983 7 E CO i"26"WTD WAS ti LU Lu m.e rc ! Q 4255 s.f i 7, v u, W o v ALI EBD ( PUBLIC - VARIABLE WIDTH ) STREET RENCES LUATION PLAN V3M 158 ON FILE WITH B.84M RR. 'RVEY DATA FROM FILES OF T.A. APPLETON. �f PLT OF LAND 11bEo4 U9E osy�`( �,.� 7 ?. Ft: Y ��.."' Il L� ii I ^ a f-c ey 7N1kT > > Pao 1 C�^ W5 t}?F pRG,^Y'Sf 7Y iit�5 � u CI\tli ?F#fiT < r -t C ( > C . IIS .3P%J 7;iE �,:1''.':t✓ ' � p +l T 5 .'� r '.� rr �. -HC, 57, .V �� �, �i = {a .y ;� r_ SALEM, MASS. . .fir - Off. s"'4 . _r ' ? R:vD F''''.A7 f3L? .'a"ziq OR FOR P;.", WAYS .F..:.7:i r� `--�_ r..i,.�S�=i'�• x- PREPARED FOR °� -- - DONALD MICHAU r PF SCALE I"Ald DEC. r ;n � y a:r Or CARTER TOWIT- ERS ERv7 G/17 , /� l'✓u YIL•. P �E0 30 CITY Ctc.30�'S OFFICE FEBRUA3,Y 24, 1977 Work 111A . DECISION ON PETITION OF EDWARD R. _SOBOCINSKI, 82 WEBB STREET CONCERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 82 G EBB STREET R--2 DISl'RICT A hearing on this petition was held January 25, 1977 with members Arthur. Labrecque, Donald Eames, Douglas Hopper, James Boulger and Chairman John Gray present. Notices were sent to abuttors and others in accordance with glass. General Laws, Chapter 808. Atty. Robert Ledoux represented the Petitioner before the Board. The Petitioner has owned the premises located at 82 Webb Street for a number of years and the building is used as a meat market. In the early 1950's an addition was built on to the existing structure on Webb Street. At that time the Petitioner was granted a building permit for the construction. However, during title examination by a Local bank, it was noted that the building itself may be in violation of the City of Salem 'Zoning Ordinance in that it does not have proper setback, side yard or rear yard density as well as having possibly exceeded the maximum lot coverage for an R-2 Zone. In an R-2 Zone the maximum lot coverage allowed is 35% and there is a requirement of a 10 ft. side yard and a 30 ft. rear yard. The Petitioner requests that the Board gram: him a variance so as to allow the structure to stand as it presently is with in- sufficient setback, side yard, rear yard and lot coverage. The Petitioner maintains that if thc. Zoning By-laws arc enforced it would involve practical + :fficulty and unto hardship in that the building was constructed in accordance with plans prepared for him. He understood that the building was constructed in accordance with plans that conformed to the Salem Zoning Ordinance. The Board voted unanimously to grant the variance to the Petitioner to allow the existing structure at 82 Webb Street to stand as is with insufficient setback, side yard, rear yard and lot coverage. The Board felt that to deny the variance requested would cause extreme hardship to the Petitioner and that since the building had been as is for a number of years, the variance could be granted without substantial detriment to the surrou., ding neighborhood or without derogating from the intent of the Salem Zoning By-law. GRANTED �cttx* ;t ki Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. Genera Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of. filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Law, Chapter 808, Section 11, the variance or special permit, granted herein, shall not take effect until a copy of the -decision, bearing the certifica- tion of the City Clerk, that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, it such an appeal has been filed, that. it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded-in. the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recor and noted in the owner's certificate of title. Copies of the decision herein have been filed with the Planning Board and the City Clerk. SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL BY I (r Sane T. Lundr gan, Secrdtary 11 i L 9 pQ ffla5r adt5 h 9 05 'A RE C E IVE D One ��afera Gum pry Bj'�,4elvfo CITY OF 4 TO: Board of Health City Engineer Building Inspector Conservation Commission FROM: Dale Yale, Clerk of Planning Board It has come to my attention that the Special Permit sent to your department in the name of Mr. Ernest DelPero, 13 Plains Road, Ipswich, was in error. Attached is the corrected permit. Will you kindly discard the permit dated June 3 , 1983 and stamped June 8 , '1983 by the City Clerk' s office. The attached is the correct copy. 191ttYn ing Pearh . "eo �Wit lr= '21alera GrUrt F I l June 13, 1983 SPECIAL PERMIT WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT t . RICHARD MCLEALLAN AND RICHARD PiiADDEN t� c/o 82 WEBB STREET `83 JUN 13 P3 34 SALEM, MA. S 019,70. R ' On Thursday,'. May 5 , 1983, the Planning Board of the City of Salem held a public hearing regarding the applicatUTrY (Lf Yr, F est DelPero, 13 Plains Road, Ipswich,' MA. , for a Sp xalr. ? � under Section P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts , of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, with respect to the construction of a four unit dwelling .,at 82 Webb . Street, Salem, M.A. . ! At a regularly. scheduled meeting of the Planning Board on June 3, 4 1983 , the Board voted, by a unanimous vote, to approvethe application as complying with the requirements for the issuance of the permit with the following. conditions : l. ' All work shall conform to calculations entitled, "Four- unit dwelling, 82 Webb Street; Salem, MA. , Revised calculations - and fdn. layout. " prepared by,.S . Nashed, . PE #31031, dated . May 18 , 1983. i 2 . Work shall ,further conform to plans entitled "Topographic . Plan of Land in Salem, MA. ' dated March, 1983. . 1 3 . This order does not;.grant any property rights or any exclusive I privileges; -it does not authorize any injury to private/public f property. or any invasion of public/private rights., I hereby certify that a. copy of this decision has been filed ; with the City Clerk, and a copy is on file with the Planning Board. This Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the de- cisicn bearing the certification of the City. Clerk that twenty , , days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such an peal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is re- corded in the Essex County. Registry of Deeds and is indexed in C the grantor index under the name of the owner of record or is re- corded and noted on the. owner' s certificate of . title. The fee ! for recording or registering shall . be paid by the owner or applicant. Walter B. Power, III Chairman, Planning. Board BOARD OF APPEALS SERAFINI AND SERAFINI ATTORNEYS AT LAWq� ^/ R o 63 FEDERAL STRESSp {.� II 44 All t8q SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 CITY kEGEIVE`gD JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. CITY OF SALEM,MASS. TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI, JR. J744-0212 JOHN E. DARLING 581-2743 ARLENE M. KEATING AREA CODE 617 LAWRENCE R. PLAVNICK September 21, 1984 Richard McIntosh Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Certificate of Occupancy for Del Homes, Inc. Property located at 82 Webb Street, Salem, Mass. Dear Mr. McIntosh: As you know, Mr. Delpero, who is President, Treasurer and principal Stockholder of Del Homes, Inc., has recently requested a certificate of occupancy for his four unit condominium project at the above address. You have expressed some concern regarding compliance of the project with the variance granted by the Board of Appeals on January 26, 1984. In reviewing the variance, one question concerns the closeness of the deck on the rear of the building to the rear lot line. As I read the variance, a general variance from the front and rear yard requirements was granted by the Board and the Board placed no restrictions on the distance of any structure from any lot line. I believe that, although the deck shape has been slightly altered from the shape shown on the plans submitted with the variance application, the building has been placed in the proper location, and the proximity of the deck to the rear lot line is permitted by the variance granted, as shown on the plot plan which accompanies this letter. I also note that on page 5, Section II B 7 of the City of Salem Zoning Ordiance, the definition of the "building line" does not mention sun decks but only covered porches and sun parlors leaving open the interpretation that the dimension measurements should be taken from the rear face of the building rather than from the deck. In sum, I believe the structure "as built" complies with the basic footprint presented to the Board of Appeals for a four family unit condominium and that a certificate of occupancy requested, therefore, may properly issue. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, JOHN R. SERAFINI, JR. JRS:mja 1 E2 Co 1 la' N F N M V EGK yQ 177"77 '- G 5 I1o .19 5 Q WF-BES STFZEET 1 I I Z � E12TiF �( THAT -TFiE US LOING I AT 8Z WE80 ST REET � SALEM \ S _j S I'T v AT E � o N 'T t-I E SITE AS S H o w ry ��P�,tN OF fd9s�ac� � z� GERALD y��\ ,.� RALPH �",• MARSELLA r--,. Z -7 , \984 Mo. 28720 G - �e 9ECISTfR�ypQ`f !�p SUR`, r' c� C� n w R4 ofIezzz, �tttczx � rg Public Vrnprtg Department « er� P1Taing Pepaxtrtenf Richard T. McIntosh October 15, 1984 1 Salem Green 745-0213 John Serafini, Jr. Re. 82 Webb St. 63 Federal St. Salem, Mass. 01970 Dear Mr. Serafini: In response to your inquiry regarding the above referenced property, my findings are as follows: 1. The present footprint of the structure at 82 Webb St, is not the same as what was presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. The present footprint of the structure exceeds what was presented in the application for Building Permit. 3. In interpreting Sec. 11-B-7 page 5 of the City Zoning Ordinance, Z find that the word Balcony is sufficient to cover the meaning of Sun Deck. For these reasons, I will not issue any Certificates of Occupancy for 82 Webb St. until the situation is resolved either by the Zoning Board of Appeals or the removal of these sections of the Sun Deck (Balcony) that violates the plan that was presented to the Board of Appeals. Very truly yours, Richard T. McIntosh Zoning Enforcement i i RTMCI./jc - oZ'' t Y'p7s' r86� 1d3n 7 -7 Ul G Vj R, � n ,r Q G .y FORM 4 J, Jay �•,r C � ~� ORDER OF CONDITIONS . W E T L A N D S P R O T E C T I O N A/C?19fiO Fj)� 9li1,n� G.L. C. 131, s. 40gSS, --------------------------------------------------------------- CITY/TOWN Salem, MA. FILE NUMBER 64-91 TO: NAME Ernest DelPero ADDRESS 13 Plains Road, Ipswich CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION: Address 82 Webb Street, Salem, MA. Recorded at Registry of S. Essex Book 6689 , Page 562 Certificate (if registered) _REGARDING Notice of Intent dated March 24, 1983 and plans titled and dated (see listing under Item 11) THIS ORDER IS ISSUED ON (date) May 26, 1983 Pursuant to the authority of C.L. c. 131, s. 40, the Salem Conservation Commission has reviewed your Notice of Intent and plans identified above, and has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to one or more of the interests listed in G.L. c. 131, s. 40. The Salem Conservation Commission hereby orders -tliC the following conditions are necessary to protect said interests and all work shall be performed in strict accordance with them and with the Notice of Intent and plans identified above except where such plans are modified by said conditions. ----------------------------------------------------------------- �- CONDITIONS - - 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be ( deemed cause to revoke or modify this order. _1_ FORM 4 r ORDER OF CONDITIONS CONTINUED FILE NUMBER 64-91 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclu- sive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This order does not relieve the permittee or any other per- son of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state or local statutes; ordinances, by-laws and/ or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of this order unless it is for a maintenance dredging project subject to Section 5(9). The order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more additional one-year periods upon application to the said issuing authority at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the order or its extension. 5. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, includ- ing, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe,_ tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 6. No work may be commenced untill all appeal periods have -- — elapsed from the order of,. the Conservation Commission or from a final order by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. , 7. No work shall be undertaken until the final order, with respect to the proposed project, has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds for the district in which the land is . located within the chain of title of the affected property. The Document number indicating such recording shall be sub- mitted on the form at the end of this order to. the issuer of this order prior to commencement of work. 8. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet bearing the words, "Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Number 64-91 9. Where the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering is requested to make a determination and to issue a super- seding order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Depart- ment. -2- ORDER OF CONDITIONS CONTINUED FILE NO. 64-91 C10. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request, in writing, that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satis=. fartoril.y completed. II. The work shall conform to the. following described plans and additional conditions. - "- a. Work shall conform to calculations entitled "Four-unit dwelling, 82 Webb Street, Salem, Ma. , Revised calculations and fdn. layout," prepared by S. Nashed, PE #31031, dated May 18, 1983. b. Work shall further conform to plans entitled "Topographic Plan of Land in Salem, MA." dated March, 1983, and detail plan prepared by J. Simonelli, #494-7377. (Note: Detail plan must be stamped with the Engineer's stamp) C. As-built drawings stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer shall be submitted to the Conservation Com- / mission prior to issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. lr= -3- ORDERS OF CONDITIONS - continued The applicant, any person aggrieved by. this order, any owner' of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be - done, or any ten residentsof the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to appeal this order to the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering provided the request is made in writing and by certified mail to the Department within ten (10) days from the issuance of this order. ISSUED BY SALEM CONSERVATION �� Al - - - COMMISSION J '•li\ ". ..� ,,J '; On this �h day of �� 19 9� before me personally appeared. k4k4 Q (t�_�0 n��cto me known to be .the person described .in, and who executed, the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he .executed .the same as his free act and deed. ,a. My Commission expires DETACH ON DOTTED LINE'ANQ.. SUBMIT TO THE ISSUER OF THIS ORDER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF-WORK. TO _ -_ (Issuing Authority) PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE ORDER OF CONDITIONS FOR THE PP.OJECT AT FILE NUMBER , HAS BEEN RECORDED AT THE REGISTRY OF ON (DATE) 9 If recorded land, the instrument number which identifies this trans- action is If registered land, the document number which identifies this trans- action is Signed Applicant -4- ,ON cq` z Conservation on Coissioq// ' X Salam. Massachusetts 01970 1� C/tYO /V TO: TO: Board of Health Ml City Engineer Building Inspector Department of Environmental Quality Engineering FROM: Dale Yale, Conservation Clerk It has come to my attention that an error was made in the Order of Conditions recently sent to your office (DEQE t 64-91) . At- tacked is the correct Order. Will you kindly discard the copy sent previously. Thank you. FOR 14 WETLANt3S nR0 TL' C T 1 0 N /: C '_ . t C: 'iY%TO'•^! I Salem, MA. 'T_T Ptv;^:viR 64-91 TO: Ernest DelPero 13 Plains Road, swich `'tO .ZrCT LOCATIONe -- r - .(82'Webb'Street; Salem, MA. (McMadd's, Inc.) Recorded at Registry of S. Essex �N, Book 6689 , P�eg> 562 Certi'=irate (if 'registered) 71-iotice of Intent dated March 24, 1983 enr_I plans titled and dated see listing under Item 11 1flit; ORDER IS ISSURD ON(date) May 26 , 1983 Pursn-nt to the nuthority of G.L. c. 131, s. 40, the 9a1PTn Con�A>�tinr, has reviewed your. Notice of Intcnt and pi,.;:-: idntified eove,. and _hae determinr:d that the area on which tihe proposed wort: is to be - �:oae ar rtgnificarat to one or more of the iz_,^.recto listed in G,L, c. 131, S. 40. 'ha Conservation Commission hereby orders tact the following conditions are xz`ceosa_y to protect said interests and all wort shall be performed in strict accordance uith them and with the Notice of Intent and plaits identified above e.cept adhere such plans are modified by said conditions. CONDITION 1. ' 11ailure to .comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all relat^-d statute, anc.'•, other r"^ut nto.y measures, .all bt'_ d^_em2d cauoc to re_t:Okc or :acdify this ord'_r. 2.. this order does not crnnt any pro?erty rights or any e'tclusive privileges; it sloes hat autilorire any injury to pTtvu':e pro'Perty or invas-'On of prili: a ri;7%1 n- 3. 'Thea order does riot relieve the p2r:i:ittee or any ogler person of the nece35iiy of complying with all other applice-,'•.e federal, state or local statute::, ordinzeeces, by-laws and/or regulations. �-4.. The work authorized hareunder shall be completed within one (1) year fron the date of this Order unless it is for a maintoii.':nce. dred :in- project subj!:ct to Sect"on' 5(9) . order may be extended by the isSlin'- authority for on`: or More additional C-.2-year perioby uper nppl:Ccait'on to the ,aid issuin; authority at least thirty 0 u.._... —..a.... •.. rl... .,.... ,..-.r ..�,... .t... ... ..r- h7... ..r�i. v n.. i�r, .n r:.:.r,.{r•n nrn'* t fN 5. my fill used in connection with this project shall he cicnn fill, eontalnnsr no Y.ranh, re use, rubbish or <iebrin, . including, without 11miting ti::4 Yene:ality of the fOru^ i)ing, lumber, i)Yi.CICs, pla:;t".'C, wire, lath, paper, card hOnr<.?, D .p('_, tires, n:;h^s, re= 's'.-,.:.ors, motor .eh _cics or pert_ , o` any of the forezoil%;. G. No ooTK may be commenced until all a,)Ydeal period; h ve elapsed from the order of L.t-- Con-_>.ervr.::9.on Cocsu,sa=m. or from f:i � 3 � r..:__ order by t.l^.. _p Dartsncclt a.. l:'ir..>canca:�z:t^1 Q�r.'_w.y '-n� ineor3n, 7. No t>or% shall 'be un:;a.takcn unti''_ the final order, with respect to the- proposed projmet, has been racordad in the F.egistry of. Deeds for the district in which the lrn+d is .located wi.thir, tfie, chain of title of the affected prope.-ty. Tito Document rnw_ioer it.r icy nng Eruch recardin? ohall be suh%e tied on the form the end of this order to the if;auer of t}ti.:J ord�:r prior to :....nm2ncc�nent of llork. S. A sign s`lall be displayed at the site not less that two square feet or more than th ea square fent bearing the vard:, "tiassar_ht:satts Departulent of Enviromaental Quality i*n-Iineerin-,. Nomber 64-91 t! Slhere the Department of Envirnnmental Quality Engineering is requested to matte a cater-i?:2tion and to is—ue a superseding order, the Conservation Commission shall be a pn ty to all ageticy proccz4,I n,,a and hearings before the D?pari]!Ellt. 10. Upon completion of the worn described herein, the applicant shell fortilvith request: in xritin .that a Certificate of Compliance be issued statin;, that the auric has b_•en sprIsfactori.ty completed. It. 'l'}:e wor'c shall conform to the following describes} plan„ altdt additional coadi.tioll.a:- < All work shall be done in conformance with calculations entitled, "Four=unit dwelling, 82 Webb Street, Salem, MA., Revised calculations ' and fdn layout. "prepared by S. Nashed, PE #31031, dated May 18, 18, 1983. Work shall further conform to plans entitled, "Topographic Plan of Land in Salem, MA. , dated March, 1983, As-built drawings-, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer shall be. submitted to the Conservation Commission prior to issuance of a Certificate -of Compliance. 64-91 iha npplica. r., any pacson *zrs?' '•- gad by th43 order) any o ;,-^_r of irrd Z` ,c tir.� V :.tnf' LA:t:i upon 4ih'c;, tha p_oposed to be done, Or t:ny tUILr^ 7L „� S3_ tt.% ty or tQ'.7n tit which Stich lord is lccited, are har_by tiz t12_'r ri'-Fit to t':Ii_- Ordur to rt.h' Dz!pnri':,;.n'-'-" O T.it..i'OT;�;t.'�n t'.4 {�!?.'._. `_.t .F.'.:'+-i-n,`'.::i:* is I1ad..- in F'rT_i::ln^ arc, by rami i.0 _i s Dtip.;: � .- . t t �. .r_a_:t t•_t: . ('+J) d;lyc; fso;r the is.3ua of tn'r:, ord r. +Sa3'D Ly SALEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION 1- 7 wr i On thin '26th' .day of , May 19 $3P before m2! pe_aonally {spy cared the above-named persons to ma ;.tcra¢rn to be the parson dascrlbLd in,, and -who executed, thekoregoiiE iitst_c=>;"t . :-.ncd nc!.owled.-ed the'- ha e.-ecu,ted the s='� as his frea ac-I azi deed. ... f T - C Yy Co^aission expires 9-9-88 Ltr f,.ln 11 ` y-� 1C 1 {' C1i Y+.'y 0jo, 'PR%Tn,p.� f`,,, r++..t.......� I I\t..-A,Qr,.i.U_:'i7 i -TIf:.`_ ,.+:3." i f; SS 4il:J�:.a 1 �!'vl Tt1. L:.i TO (Isiuiny Authority) P.ZE.ASE WE ADVISED fwUT THE ORDER Or CONT- ITIONSFOR THZ PROJECT AT FILW r"MBE2 H%S BEEN RECOPTE'D -AT TF.E P.ECIST:?X Cr ON (DAT;_) ?a racarded land, the instrument nut-.b­ 4Aiicn identifies thi. transaction is land tha doC'u-ms=nt nil z.^ e. which 'T_dcnt'iiies thi; : trans:^..=_ion is i Signa Applicant ACUll "4 �hi 1 �iZ1G!�^�}�� ���r .lrf of i 111 - fg � e,T3N� :7 a.iCor197. !3J C`r--r (oup _ttlem �c>n{YCp CITY OF SALEM.MASS. •83 JUJ -8 A10 :09 June 1 , 1983 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SAL_E� `IS; SPECIAL PL'RMIT 1'13TLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT T,iR . ERNEST D LPER0 13 PLAINS ROAD IPSs•IICH, N.A. On Thursday, Vlay 5, 1983 , the Planning Board of the City of Salem held a public hearing regarding the application of 11r . Ernest DelPero , 13. Plains Road, Ipswich, TiA . ,for a Special Permit under Section P , Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts , of the Salem Zoning Ordinance , with respect to the construction of a four- unit dwelling at 82 Webb Street, Salem, IIA . At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board on June 2 , 1983 , the Board voted; by a unanimous . vote to approve the application as complying with the requirements for the issuance ' of the permit with the following conditions : 1. All work shall conform to calculations entitled "Four- unit dwelling, 82 Webb Street, Salem, T:TA . , Revised calculations ariafdn. layout. " prepared by S . Nashed , P7 L'31031, dated lay 18, 1983. 2 . '::orb: shall further conform to plans entitled "Topographic Play? c Land in :ale^, ?° dated T°arc':, 1983 , and detail plan prepared by J. Simonelli , .4494-7377. The aforementioned detail pian rust be striped .._th the 3no1;neer's stamp. 3 . T,ds order does not ,rant any property rights or any exclusive priv .le ;es; it does not authorize any injury to private/public property or any invasion of public,/private rights . I iter?by certify that a cpy of this decision has been filed wi ,h the City Clerk , and a copy is on file with the Planning Bo ar,d. This Sr_ eCial Permit shall not take effect until a c-py of the de- cisic;n bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty day: have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such ap- pea.l has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is re- c,r1_d in the ssox C,unty Registry of Deeds an8 is indexed in tit' a.nt,r index a l`ar the name of the owner of record or is re- land notod ->n i.-lie o:vn^res Certlf icate of tJ.tle . ^'he fee oordin-; or r .storing; shall b paid by the -)wrier or applicant. Halter B. Power, IIT , Chairman