60-62 WEBB STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 60
sComplete
1 + Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. (also wish to receive the
11 : Complete items 3,and 4a&le following services(for an extra fee): II 'l
your name and address an the reverse of this form$o that vie can rtturn this card
110 you 1. 171 Addressee's Address
Attach this+ Witer'Return oReoo the front eipt Requested[on the mothers below the arlCepnumbe,ace not permit 2 El Restricted Delivery
. The Return Recarot Fee will provide you the signature ot the person delivered to and the Consult postmaster for fee.
dateof eliverv� _ _ ,
3.Article Addressed to: i 4a.Article Number
uNEI j P 921 991 642 j
! Pichprd & tiiiiiixf Quint o
1i Fat)b 3Lt't3CE 4b.Service Type p
Salem, r7W3. 41970 z'
CERTIFIED a
rmi
p 7.Date of Delivery i
5.Signatu' (Addressee)
B.Addressee's Address �. m
(ONLY if requested and fee pard) y
6.Signature—(Agent)
PS Form 3811,November 1990 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT j
Ih I
i
CITY OF SALEM
BUILDING DEPARTMENT 99� 6y2
i
CITY HALL ANNEX tt S
ONE SALEM GREEN ii U `,L
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 0197 Q.» H METER 412 i r 4
� RF
MA
�Uq
P4 to Eb
(ejFENpFq -;., �FUUFO
MA Richard & William Quirk
Ist NOtre 60-62 Webb Street
2nd N�[1i1. U7� Iftem, Mass. 01970
Tito of *Ule m, Aaasnc4usletts
Public Propertg Department
Nuilbing Department
(ane fbatem Green
500-745-9595 Ext. 380
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer
December 1, 1994
Richard & William Quirk
60-62 Webb Street
Salem, Mass. 01970
RE: 60-62 Webb Street
Dear Gentlemen:
This office has received a complaint regarding the above mentioned
property. An inspection was conducted on November 30, 1994 of the premises
and the correspondence in the street file in this office. It seems you were
granted a Special Permit by the Salem Board of Appeals in April of 1987. On
February 25, 1988 four permits were issued to convert a two family dwelling
into a four family dwelling. Upon my inspection I counted three units being
lived in without any occupancy permits having been issued. I also observed
that the required parking per Board of Appeals decision has not been conformed
with.
Gentlemen, please contac this office upon receipt of this letter so these
problems can be resolved. Failure to do so will result in legal action being
taken against you.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Leo E. Tremblay
Inspector of Buildings
LET: scm
cc: Dave Shea
Councillor Hayes, Ward 6
Certified Mail # P 921 991 642
BUILDitd@ DEPT �� C
/3p3To�t � MaINE CoR.F' ,
.lo f h I.9
�t'iY OF�A EM�MAS.S•.
� s
9Z.8`l 2 cAR
Lo-r 596 JA¢WrC
A
4 r
ru3 6A P- tvriotJ�MJo � �7ecx ., oR�Ss y
3.i N fk1MF 4AZ 4f
H�NZJ
p Neo D v
N
N AD D!'(jo/J 3:2 301,0
4.9
Q Lr^ 1.'1 a
37 2'/z
Woe HCAµE
1.1 �7wELL/ 19
N
ye 1�
If M M
e
8.2
/04.39 1
�o> NuH3E'R I�E�ERh .
.._, 7o t�hhESho►�5' Melts �
35, �A(,er1 , thA. •
PLOT PL.�h/ OFl�9�0
LOCATED Al
SAL M
,5 ,PereR EQ.VCES:- Sc,7/e.• >''= 20 ' j�rE3
OEED [ EC. BK. P`1H OF MA a 2a {O
' PCAA/: ROBER c
I HFefBY COPT (� .f/ g�gvi 65 IM&COW NORM SH02€ S U e SLY CORP.
Aee<:Goc?�to ar/> o a� /8/ esscx sligeetseleln,Aa?.
6 . a- e �
� i Q Q < ✓AL A.✓C Svq VY VO.t, • 11
( it co
of �m, ttssttte -q A10 :00
Poarb of c4PrA
CITYnr
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD & WILLIAM QUIRK FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT PoR�64-62 WEBB STREET(R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 29, 1987 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and i
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners are requesting a Special Permit to convert a two family dwelling into
a four unit residenntial building, also a Special Permit from rear and side setback
requirements to allow construction of an addition and decks. Property is located
in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section
VIII B and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of non-
conforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of non-
conforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental
than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requssts,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, the Board of Appeal makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition;
2. This is a large house that is difficult to maintain in its
present condition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed use in in harmony with the district and will promote
the convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants;
2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
1
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD & WILLIAM QUIRK FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 60-62 WEBB ST. , SALEM
page two,
rant the Special
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, t4 g p
Permit requested, subject to the following conditions;
1 . Property be owner occupied;
2. Parking plan "B" as modified and said plan to be further modified
to include three foot buffer zone abutting the Manzi property and
fenced with evergreens;
3. Construction per elevations submitted;
t
G. Construction conform to requirements of the state building code;
5. Conform to allow requirements of the Salem Fire Department;
6. A building permit must be obtained;
7. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED °
amss B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IFF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808. AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE,DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSANT TO L'.ASS. GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER, 808, SECTION 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT
GRANTED HEREIN. SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THE DECISION, BEAR'NG THE CERT.
FICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL_HAS BEEN FILED,
OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT HAS BEEN DIS?91SSED OR DENIED IS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
r
1 '
i f Lte;or.
R BERT��r5
NMAN
EBBat 4
� C1Stf9�������
�h� Nq1 tA14U S
Olt & '��✓
r t
: r?varf
uy.) GLr r17-
yr
/ 16 i' fl'jan.a'r
ao c fr zvf�
1
n
`v
fh
�//r�o/r�r fJur` /yu/'Yo�r7c1" f(7cir`'
�o
�u
60
so so
wo
' v
r
.v
a
'�
Of'✓J
R @�ER7
3 r
NMAN
18887 �.
r v
�i e^ CITE
`rte 1AN05
0 &
'`,ti �•�O r ori
z G ar
pvr-7t
, h 4-t727-
� y
. Y
^�
I i
�• f � t a,,,,o� �rr�it � 1
1 ( `
I( t yr
w e iv
�ir/rj .�/r✓rc „furvr� tor-p ,/cf�e�.i.I��' _
BUILDING DEPT N/ Ff
n f t 19
807
REC�IVEQAlA3.S•.' k �"
�{�Y pF SALEM
k "y
4.
'34.3
EH/1V o o- Dec 3 L'Ai2.
°
3. Fei+E �itRAq,F
S.1 N H a
w a 40.3 a %i
meo 'j
^, AODr4ierii -. .$'t 3d:o
` ; /.. :..
37
i u/oo D Fi41 H E -
V a pwee61 l
M M
� "`
8"2
Lo, lJvN13E'�e ��v�Rs -
70 �5hE56oR5' M4r� at --
36, 6W#4 , iNA.
PtoT P�.4w o���o
LOCATfO /
Pre,00area' dor
r-c"� Quiet
,PEffe�.veEs:- Sca/e.• f''= 2e ' ��3 z , I989
DEED ' ,PEC. B/f. P`�H Of Mq u 20 d�
z7 ROBE
I le toy Mer {? aqui " GS Ale,?, NORTN sNoaF suRvey ColeP..
,P GOCArM or/> o .mak /8/ Esscx .s�'reetsale�, fir' +
of 1*1em, 1ffla95ar*je -Q A11 :00
'L poarb D f. ud
CITY. -,rc
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD & WILLIAM QUIRK FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 60-62 WEBB STREET (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held April 29, 1967 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs., Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners are requesting a Special Permit to convert a two family dwelling into
a four unit residenntial building, also a Special Permit from rear and side setback
requirements to allow construction of an addition and decks. Property is located
in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of
Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section
VIII B and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of non-
conforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of non-
conforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental
than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requssts,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
-safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, the Board of Appeal makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition;
2. This is a large house that is difficult to maintain in its
present condition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed use in in harmony with the district and will promote
the convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants;
2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Tod E
° '%
a�
Tito of *ttlem, Massac4usetts
3 lode Public Prnpertg Department
iliiuilbing Department
(lane Belem t6reen
508-745-9595 F-d. 380
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer
December 1, 1994
Richard & William Quirk
60-62 Webb Street
Salem, Mass. 01970
RE: 60-62 Webb Street
Dear Gentlemen:
This office has received a complaint regarding the above mentioned
property. An inspection was conducted on November 30, 1994 of the premises
and the correspondence in the street file in this office. It seems you were
granted a Special Permit by the Salem Board of Appeals in April of 1987. On
February 25, 1988 four permits were issued to convert a two family dwelling
into a four family dwelling. Upon my inspection I counted three units being
lived in without any occupancy permits having been issued. I also observed
that the required parking per Board of Appeals decision has not been conformed
with.
Gentlemen, please contac this office upon receipt of this letter so these
problems can be resolved. Failure to do so will result in legal action being
taken against you.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. n
Sincerely, VI�
jll
� l
Leo E. Tremblay
Inspector of Buildings
LET: scm
cc: Dave Shea
Councillor Hayes, Ward 6
Certified Mail li P 921 991 642
� QQQ