The URL can be used to link to this page

9 WEBB STREET - 41-0154 - BUILDING INSPECTION 'M9 Webb St. � GIST Y i I ..... .. .. .� .�,w.,�� _•�_ �:�; � .r._-:-:..-c?mP,a^-+ w-....u.tv+ .-..e_ ....SR^ .-�^.o!P!'!.�-, 'w�e"r"� '^'�9 .�,PtiY'�. �-.�. �n A�.. ....,n-�"'v^.:- ....Tm3 �w.m.re. � ~ w9V �i t � 4 �` i �� S r �� w �� i S) I - G i t i jj,3* L CA, ��nV �� . �- �' \ ® f /� �� r�` �� x ��°/ �. ,�� i � � . r. a�gaC�jugPtt� Citp of *al m, �� 3Publit i3ropertp Mepartment �q 3Builbing Department One balem Oreen d _ (978)-745-9595 Cxt. 380 -" — - - — Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings i Zoning Enforcement Officer January 25, 2000 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz c/o Bollick and Welch 32 Church Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Ms. Colitz: _Due to numerous complaints and in_response response-to concern, I inspected the exterior of your property located at 1-11 Cousins Street. I have also been inside the building on several occasions. This department is concerned about continued deterioration of this property. As you are a probably aware, a structural report, conducted by Robert Rumpf and Associates dated January 1998,points out several structural problems. This report also summarizes; "The present condition of the building is so poor as to not warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs." The building is now two years older and stilliuffering from additional deterioration and the rotting problems caused by the leak.,. Section 121 of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, allows a building official to declare a building unsafe structure if it is open to the weather, abandoned or if such structure would be especially unsafe in case of fire. This department and City of Salem Fire Department feel this building would be especially unsafe in case of fire. Therefore you are directed to begin the process to make safe or remove the structure. Please contact this office within ten (10) days upon receipt of this letter to discuss your plans for this building. Failure to respond will result in court action being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order you may appeal to the State Building Code Board of Appeals. Forms available at our office. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. w � Sincerely, . Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc: Mayor Usovicz Fire Prevention Councillor LaCava Polish Falcons Club of America i Citp of 6alenl, Ilaoubugetto 30epartment of public *erbiceo (One 9paletn green (978) 745-9595 text. 321 STANLEY 1.BORNSTEIN,P.E. City Engineer Sfax: (978) 745-5877 Director of Public Services I May 17, 2000 Peter Strout, Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Board of Survey, former Richards Leather, Webb St. Dear Peter: As you know, on May 12, 2000 I, along with yourself, Chief Turner, Inspector LaTulippe, and William Hobbs visited and inspected the above mentioned site. The purpose of our inspection was to determine the level of hazard that exists at the site and to determine whether or not the building could be salvaged. As a result of our inspection, I can say firmly that the level of hazard is extreme and that it is not possible to salvage the existing structure. During my inspection, I noted the almost total lack of lateral bracing in the structure. This feature makes the building inherently unstable, as noticed by the fact that the building is listing towards Cousins Street several inches. I also noticed that at some point,the roof trusses had their bottom chords removed and replaced with vertical posts. This will result in transferring the roof load from the outside walls to the columns below. On their best day, the columns below were not designed for that load. The columns that I saw were rotted severely and damaged by impact. Several floor joists were barely attached to their respective columns. Most connections were nailed and not bolted. I notice quite a bit of damage that appeared to be new. 1 saw several main carrying beams that were showing signs of recent failure. The added weight of the ice from this winter when the sprinkler system failed could be to blame. The flat roof on the Cousins Street side is supported on its upper end by a single 2x4 ledger board. This ledger has pulled away from the wall as much as a foot in places. The weight of a fire fighter would surely bring this roof down. I am worried that when this roof collapses (which I believe V n is imminent)that it will displace the columns that support the main building. This would lead to instant structure failure. In short I believe that the structure is so dangerous and so close to failure as to pose an immediate threat to public safety. It is my opinion that the building should be razed immediately. I have not mentioned the obvious hazard of the electrical service and environmental hazard that exist. I would like to take this time to emplore the fire department to not enter the building, as it would surely lead to a tragedy. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, 1\Ii ael Collins, Assistant City Engineer Cite of *alem, 1Ra5!6aCbugettg Public Propertp Mepartment 36uiCDing department One 6alem Oreen (978) 745-9595(Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer May 31, 2000 RE: Richard Leather Dear Residence: We are in the process of demolishing the Richard Leather Building. These are the steps that will take place in the next few months. 1. The environmental engineers are taking samples of any contaminates that will have to be removed from the property. 2. We will have an exterminator set traps on the entire property to try to eliminate the chance of rodent problems. 3. The property will be abated of all contaminates and underground tank. The city will not be responsible for ground contaminates, that will be the owners responsibility. 4. The building will be demolished and cleaned. Sincerel , Peter t out Inspector of Buildings a� \/ a • v �f by a s r.�g ti CptiC� . a 6Z ay(p S1 N y � t� rjr3 x\41/ trgj W 9a �'►'.� ro�.%p 0tl "} p3G y r � i O 41 ►« fi QO q� 4YGQti 6 C7_ Gp,, Qx� �` �\ �9 a ��« �,�Cij�,,4y Qy z.. a. s n p r, Q` G qro p' g6�/v Y °s 13 Otl w�y a o i _'�F .� «y S''r sF♦ « t groro 0 >ti ,�C � O w� Gq��J pYtl ti�Yq / ./ Lit, y r1 �i w VaiY' • _� a 6 c. aX g /f ti s� "tt 6� h4 •�. � ,� •r � J "\� � a°Y YoJ.� F,{�, . q � L SJ a W gb+i 1 3 ` r ♦ JJ » "1 a a s y aF so aF v � 160 k &'pl k os3S Ls panr� 049f w •,ab/ .9 lel k\ i- i 1 S ca of o� S w /tss 00 ov . , tt1 <" O Z �, ar °t fi o« fJl1� J �aF'F ;� RFs 009'1F � � tfiro A y, r i?-�`J �4�J • $ ! $5Z 0 4 y it�_. z xD1 KNtll x O SZ ( t r i` 3avnos ss x )Ivs n ld » Fsgz I � k / +6/0191 697+ y0&1 QC3�i oa S. p0 6J B + ,' ti , 0 , +�/ / •i ,, a" g� SoVr i3 5tr2 a1�� lt,Zm yco ,P a, . � �♦ �„AZ� �� a Y � a % / i ." � rh O6 9161 as, . CID /j apo � g6y a9 a a c9 a- S `4 £ teFe y r . 0 e L°�z« 09as Ljfss � LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER M. WELCH THIRTY-TWO CHURCH STREET SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE(978)745-0500 FACSIMILE(978)745-6606 NEWBURYPORT OFFICE CHRISTOPHER M.WELCH 24 CENTER STREET JOSEPH J.WELCH NEWBURYPORT,MASSACHUSETTS 01950 JAMES L.ROGAL TELEPHONE(978)465-5022 FACSIMILE(978)4653506 Of Con+uel E.DOUGLAS BOLICK May 22, 2000 HAND DELIVERED Peter Strout—Inspector of Buildings Building Department One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA One Cousins Street Realty Trust Dear Mr. Strout: You will find enclosed an Order of Notice that there will be a hearing on the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order at 2:00 PM at Newburyport Superior Court. I will have the pleadings delivered to Bill Ludregan's office today. I would urge the City to cease attempting to demolish the building until the Court decides the Motion. Please call me if you would like to discuss this matter further. Sine ely, .1 ogal JLR/wp Enc. LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER M. WELCH THIRTY-TWO CHURCH STREET SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE(978)745-0500 FACSIMILE(978)745-6606 NEWBURYPORT OFFICE CHRISTOPHER M.WELCH 24 CENTER STREET JOSEPH J.WELCH NEWBURYPORT,MASSACHUSETTS 01950 JAMES L. AOGAL TELEPHONE(978)465-5022 FACSIMILE(978)465-3506 Of Counsel E.DOUGLAS BOLICK February 1, 2000 Thomas St. Pierre—Local Building Inspector City of Salem Public Property Department One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Mr. St. Pierre: This letter is to follow up on our telephone conversation on Monday, January 31, 2000. As I informed you, I represent the One Cousins Street Realty Trust, the owner of the real estate at 1-11 Cousins Street. I have discussed your letter dated January 25, 2000 with the owner and I have advised the owner to address the issues raised in it. You agreed to give us two weeks to respond. In the meantime, please call me if you would like to discuss this matter further. Si cerely, Rogal JLR/wp Citp of *aiem, A1ag!5arbU.5ettg y � Public Propertp Department 36uilbing Department one balem&Teen (978) 745-9595(Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings copy Zoning Enforcement Officer January 25, 2000 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz c/o Bollick and Welch 32 Church Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Ms. Colitz: Due to numerous complaints and in response to neighborhood concern, I inspected the exterior of your property located at 1-11 Cousins Street. I have also been inside the building on several occasions. This department is concerned about continued deterioration of this property. As you are a probably aware, a structural report, conducted by Robert Rumpf and Associates dated January 1998,points out several structural problems. This report also summarizes; "The present condition of the building is so poor as to not warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs." The building is now two years older and still suffering from additional deterioration and the rotting problems caused by these leaks. Section 121 of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, allows a building official to declare a building unsafe structure if it is open to the weather, abandoned or if such structure would be especially unsafe in case of fire. This department and City of Salem Fire Department feel this building would be especially unsafe in case of fire. MAY, 01. 2000 IMO BETAENGINBERING NO, 4866 P. BM ENVNMw NgP RIC. Engineers • Scientist • Planners May 31,2000 Via Fox; 978--140-9046(2 sheets) Mr.Peter K.Strout, Director Department of Public Properties City of Salem One Salem Green Salem,MA 01970 RE: Environmental Services Richard Leather factory Webb& Cousins Streets Salem,Massachusetts Dear Peter: Pursuant to your emergency authorization to proceed, given to BETA Group,Inc, on.May 10,2000,we have commenced preparing the above-referenced property C'Site")for demolition. To date,we have almost completed on-Site services related to the following oil and hazardous materials issues: • Underground storage tanks • Aboveground storage tanks • Transformers • PCB containing equipment • Waste trenches • Septic tank • Fluorescent light bulbs and ballasts • Containerized waste • Asbestos survey • Miscellaneous waste We anticipate completing all of the above services on or about Friday,June 2, 2000. At present we are soliciting two demolition bids for the City to review. We understand the City will contract directly with the contractor. Per our discussion on May 25,2000, the demolition will be conducted as follows: • The contractor will conduct the asbestos remediation and demolition as one contract E,HODE AS ND NA5SAGHU9E7T$ CONNECTICUT O Blut'kwne VWW PWa,Lk, ,41(289/ 1420 PWdOftitNhwy,Sual 117,NOM1YOOd,44102062, SOD Hwmd SVOK Now LOWM,DT 803$0 44Y331.23BE(mc4p1•S.V'4YL5 ( 7iT•288•i BOE IAx:791•EIX1.187a OW-437.0239 fez BED•444.0374 EE70.0BETA OnO.�A ) SETAOSETA",Orn BEAW06W.Com 'i MAY. 31, 2000 10:540 BETAENGINEERING NG 4865 P' � j • BETA will provide asbestos remediation specifications and monitor the i( asbestos removal + The contractor is to remove all of the Site structures including foundations and other subsurface structures and restore the Site to level grade with clean fill The contractor is to be prepared to commence demolition/asbestos removal within one week of award of the contract At present,it appears that costs for BETA and its subcontractors(which will be billed at cost+151/o7)will be around$50,000;not including containerized waste disposal,and demolition/asbestos removal and monitoring. I trust you are pleased with the progress to date. We will continue to proceed expeditiously toward completion of the project in a cost-effective manner. Please signify your agreement with my understanding of the project and its costs, as stated above,by completing the authorization section below, Please call me anytime at 401-333-23$2 x119 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BETA Group, Inc. n P.Geisser,PE,RLS,LSP enior Project Manager one...u....■u.anon.nrr.r...................................ru...... Authonz ' % s , x M2Zi7 Peter K. S ut,Arrector of Public Properties U City of Salem,Massachusetts D c Citp of *alem, A1aggarbU!5ett!5 r Public Propertp Mepartment uiCDin ]Department One 9palem green (978) 745-9595 text. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer 5/22/99 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz RE: 1-11 Cousins St. Dear Ms. Colitz: On Ma 15 2000 The Cit of Salem entered the property at 1-11 Cousins St. with the Y Y p p Y owners permission and conducted a"Survey Board" inspection according to 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As a result the board found the building to be extremely dangerous and in need of immediate repair or the removal of the structure. The City Building Department has been trying to work with the owners past and present to provide us with a suitable plan to proceed with making the building safe and have had no response. This process has been going on for several years with the building further failing. At this point we are forced to invoke 121.4 and start the process immediately. Sincerel Peter Strout Building Commissioner ROBERT M. RUMPF & ASSOCIATES RE : REPORT ��vtN or , sr+c #6002 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Structural Inspection ROBERT �G,�, Richard Tanning Co. M. 101 DERBY STREET 3 RUMPF SALEM, MASS.01970 Salem, Massachusetts p No. 6632 ,0 O 506.745-6596 FAX 508-745-6596 SOA.FQ/ST6Q��@�W �SSroNA1. 01/07/98 Mr. Leo Tremblay Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 by hand - REPORT re: . Structural Inspection 9 Webb Street Leather Company Facility Salem Massachusetts This is a report on our inspection of the referenced building with full emphasis on occupants' safety. We believe that the present condition of the building is so poor as not to warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs. The remedial directives shown on the enclosed plans are strictly of a temporary nature to insure safety. They are only effective if no additional loading is introduced beyond those required for current operations. Boiler room roof framing requires reinforcing. This engineer shall specify corrective work in the area while shoring operations are underway. We will be making periodic inspections to see that the drawing requirements are met, and keep you informed of same. If you need additional information, please advise. 10 0 uR/eectf�ully nit 1E N No. 6632 Ire-. O � Robert M. Rumpf, Fo,5 TGP4'+4`� Robert M. Rumpf& L kpC Cc: Mr. Leo Ztsis-Trustee 9 Webb Street Salem; Massachusetts 01970 HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION Consultants in the Engineering Sciences 34 Rockland Street,Swampscott,MA 01907 781.581.2454 12 May 2000 City of Salem Public Property Department Building Department Re: Existing Conditions, 1-11 Cousins St., Former `Richard Leather Co., Inc. Building' Salem, MA Attention: Peter Strout, Building Commissioner Gentlemen: As you requested, today we made a visual survey of certain conditions at the building. We were accompanied by Commissioner Strout while others were present. The building walls are out-of-plumb with a visually-alarming lean toward Cousins St. Many of the interior timber columns show this same lean with associated distress to the timber beams they support. Much of the structure's interior framing is severely deteriorated, structurally inappropriate and unstable, or both. We consider the existing structure to be dangerously unstable and unsafe. High winds, ponding rain water or snow on the roofs, or ajar from heavy vehicular traffic could trigger a collapse. We consider that the structure is a hazard which could result in injury or death. Not only the public as a whole,but especially the residences on the opposite side of Cousins St. are at risk. Very truly, HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION 17� William Loring Hobbs President rtaAwl m. LQ R f» Frank D. DeFalco ,. Principal C tp of *alem, �Hamwbu!6ettq c Public Prupertp Department �uilbing Department One balem Oreen (978) 745-9595 ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings �® Zoning Enforcement Officer PY January 25, 2000 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz c/o Bollick and Welch 32 Church Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Ms. Colitz: Due to numerous complaints and in response to neighborhood concern, I inspected the exterior of your property located at 1-11 Cousins Street. I have also been inside the building on several occasions. This department is concerned about continued deterioration of this property. As you are a probably aware, a structural report, conducted by Robert Rumpf and Associates dated January 1998, points out several structural problems. This report also summarizes; "The present condition of the building is so poor as to not warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs." The building is now two years older and still suffering from additional deterioration and the rotting problems caused by these leaks. Section 121 of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, allows a building official to declare a building unsafe structure if it is open to the weather, abandoned or if such structure would be especially unsafe in case of fire. This department and City of Salem Fire Department feel this building would be especially unsafe in case of fire. Therefore you are directed to begin the process to make safe or remove the structure. Please contact this office within ten(10)days upon receipt of this letter to discuss your plans for this building. Failure to respond will result in court action being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order you may appeal to the State Building Code Board of Appeals. Forms available at our office. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, . Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc: Mayor Usovicz Fire Prevention Councillor LaCava Polish Falcons Club of America AREA CODE 978 TEL. 745.5440 P.O. BOX 868 TEL. 744-5686 RICHARD TANNING CO. , INC. FAX .744.4624 MANUFACTURERS OF ANTELO VELOUR GARMENT SUEDE 9 WEBB ST. — SALEM, MA 01970 Jan. 28 , 1998 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building RE; 9 Webb Street Dear Mr. Tremblay, We are requesting a building permit to address certain temporary repairs recommended by Robert M. Rumpf and Associates to enable continuing work to be performed at this location, until the end of June 1998 . It will be our intention at that time to determine if it will be economically viable to do permanent rep to the building, o-t- � AA,-O,--+- .tt- Gy Thank you for your continuing support in thi atter . Since ely, Leo Zi s 3 Titg of igttlem, massar4usetts tlublic Vrupertg i9epartment Nuilbing Ilepartment (Out dalcm (6recn 508-745.9595 Ed. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer October 28 , 1997 Richard Leather Co. Inc . 9 Webb Street Salem, Mass . 01970 ATT: Leo Zisis RE: 9 Webb Street Dear Mr . Zisis : This office has been more than patient in waiting for a response from your structural engineer as to what precautions are being made to make the structure safe to enable continuing work to be performed in this building located at 9 Webb Street . This office considers this building unsafe for occupancy under the present condition. Please notify this department within fifteen ( 15 ) days upon receipt of this letter , to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violations . Failure to do will result tin legal action being taken . Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincer y, /1 Leo E. Trembl, y- Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc : David Shea Health Department Fire Department Councillor Paskowski, Ward 1 �3 C�tt�r of tmiem, mttssttr4usetts Public Praptag i9epartment , o Nuilbing Department (4nc fttm force" 5118-745-9595 Ext. 300 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer July 9 , 1997 Richard Leather Co. Inc . 9 Webb Street Salem, Mass . 01970 Attention : Leo Zisis RE: 9 Webb Street Dear Mr . Zisis : On July 8 , 1997 , per the request of the City of Salem Health Department and some of your abutters, an inspection was conducted at 9 Webb St . on the existing condition of your factory. Per our conversation, you agreed to hire a structural engineer and perform any necessary structural repairs that he found would be required. He is also to file a report to my office in writing of his findings, and means of correction. This office intends on working closely with you to bring this building into State Building Code compliance . Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Leo E . Tremblay Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc : David Shea Health Department Fire Department Councillor Paskowski , Ward 1 1 f of 6alem, AamwbuattE; Public Propertp Department �4 3guilbing Mepartment One$ialem Oreen (978) 745-9595(Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Copy Zoning Enforcement Officer January 25, 2000 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz c/o Bollick and Welch 32 Church Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Ms. Colitz: Due to numerous complaints and in response to neighborhood concern, I inspected the exterior of your property located at 1-11 Cousins Street. I have also been inside the building on several occasions. This department is concerned about continued deterioration of this property. As you are a probably aware, a structural report, conducted by Robert Rumpf and Associates dated January 1998,points out several structural problems. This report also summarizes; "The present condition of the building is so poor as to not warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs." The building is now two years older and still suffering from additional deterioration and the rotting problems caused by these leaks. Section 121 of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, allows a building official to declare a building unsafe structure if it is open to the weather, abandoned or if such structure would be especially unsafe in case of fire. This department and City of Salem Fire Department feel this building would be especially unsafe in case of fire. Therefore you are directed to begin the process to make safe or remove the structure. Please contact this office within ten(10) days upon receipt of this letter to discuss your plans for this building. Failure to respond will result in court action being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order you may appeal to the State Building Code Board of Appeals. Forms available at our office. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, . Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc: Mayor Usovicz Fire Prevention Councillor LaCava Polish Falcons Club of America Cttp of 6a[emp Aag!6arbU!5ettg Y Public Propertp Mepartment , r jguilbing Department One oalem Green (978) 745-9595 (Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer 5/22/99 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz RE: 1-11 Cousins St. Dear Ms. Colitz: On May 15 2000 The City of Salem entered the property at 1-11 Cousins St. with the owners permission and conducted a"Survey Board" inspection according to 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As a result the board found the building to be extremely dangerous and in need of immediate repair or the removal of the structure. The City Building Department has been trying to work with the owners past and present to provide us with a suitable plan to proceed with making the building safe and have had no response. This process has been going on for several years with the building further failing. At this point we are forced to invoke 121.4 and start the process immediately. Sincerely Aert Building Commissioner 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE If it appears that such building or structure would be case of such demolition, the said building official especially unsafe in case of fire, it shall be deemed shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with dangerous within the meaning hereof, and the adjacent grades by a inorganic fill. The costs and building official may affix in a conspicuous place charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the land upon its exterior walls a notice of its dangerous upon which the structure is located, and shall be condition, which shall not be removed or defaced enforced in an action of contract; and such owner without authority from him. shall,for every days continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so notified,be punished by a fine 121.3 Removal or making structure safe: Any in accordance with 780 CMR 118.4. The provisions person so notified shall be allowed until 12:00 noon of M.G.L. c. 139, § 3A,paragraph two, relative to of the day following the service of the notice in liens for such debt and the collection of claims for which to begin to remove such building or structure such debt shall apply to any debt referred to in this or make it safe, or to make it secure, and he shall section, except that the said building official shall employ sufficient labor speedily to make it safe or act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of remove it or to make it secure; but if the public selectmen. During the time such order is in effect, safety so requires and if the mayor or selectmen so it shall be unlawful to use or occupy such structure order, the building official may immediately enter or any portion thereof for any purpose. upon.the premises with the necessary workmen and assistants and cause such unsafe structure to be made 121.6 Remedy of person ordered to remove a safe or demolished without delay and a proper fence dangerous structure or make it safe: put up for the protection of passersby,or to be made Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 122,an secure. - owner, aggrieved by such order may have the remedy prescribed by M.G.L. c. 139, §2:provided 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, that any provision of M.G.L.c. 139, §2 shall not be survey board,survey report: If an owner of such construed so as to hinder, delay or prevent the unsafe structure refuses or neglects to complywith building official from acting and proceeding under the requirements of such notice within the specified 780 CMR 121; and provided, further, that this time limit, and such structure is not made safe or section shall not prevent the city or town from taken down as ordered therein, a careful survey of recovering the forfeiture provided in said 780 CMRf the premises shall be made oy a board consisting;in 121.5 from the date of the service of the original a city, of a city engineer, the head of the fire notice,unless the order is annulled by the jury. department, as such term is defined in M.G.L. c. 148, § 1, and one disinterested person to be 780 CMR 122.0 BOARD OF APPEALS appointed by the building official;and, in a town of 122.1 State Building Code Appeals Board: a surveyor,the head of the fire department and one Except for actions taken pursuant to 780 CMR disinterested person to be appointed by the building 121.0,whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, official. In the absence of any of the above officers order,requirement, direction or failure to act under or individuals, the mayor or selectmen shall 780 CMR by any agency or official of the city,town designate one or more officers or other suitable or region,or agency or official of the State charged persons in place of the officers so named as with the administration or enforcement of 780 CMR members of said board. A written report of such or any of its rules or regulations, excepting any survey shall be made, and a copy thereof served on specialized codes, may appeal directly to the State such owner. Building Code Appeals Board as provided in 780 CMR 122.0. 121.5 Removal of dangerous or abandoned structures: If such survey report as outlined in Whoever is aggrieved f interpretation,order, or requirement, direction or failure to act under 780 CMR 121.4 declares such structure to be 780 CMR by any agency or official of a city, town dangerous or to be unused, uninhabited or or region charged with the administration or abandoned, and open to the weather, and if the enforcement of 780 CMR,excepting any specialized owner continues such refusal or neglect,the building codes, may appeal directly to the State Building official shall cause it to be made safe or taken down Code Appeals Board or may appeal fust to,a local or or to be made secure; and, if the public safety so regional building code appeals board and if requires, said building official may at once enter the aggrieved thereby he may then appeal to the State structure,the land on which it stands or the abutting Building Code Appeals Board as provided in land or buildings, with such assistance as he may 780 CMR 122.0. require, and secure the same; and may remove and In the event an appeal is taken directly to the State evict, under the pertinent provisions of M.G.L. Building Code Appeals Board from an c.239,or otherwise,any tenant or occupant thereof; interpretation, order, requirement or direction, said and may erect such protection for the public by appeal shall be filed as specified in 780 CMR proper fence or otherwise as may be necessary, and 1223.1 with the State Building Code Appeals Board for this purpose may close a public highway. In the not later than 45 days after the service of notice 28 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) ROBERT M. RUMPF & ASSOCIATES RE : REPORT �,p`'S'v,N OF �Gs�+cy #8002 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Structural Inspection ROBERT Richard Tanning Co. M 101 DERBY STREET � RUMPf Salem, Massachusetts. - No. 6632 SALEM,MASS.01970 p 506.745-6596 FAX 506-745.6596 q� Q/ST6Q'�?�Wa �SSIONAL 6a4` 01/07/98 Mr. Leo Tremblay Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 by hand - REPORT re: . Structural Inspection 9 Webb Street Leather Company Facility Salem Massachusetts This is a report on our inspection of the referenced building with full emphasis on occupants' safety. We believe that the present condition of the building is so poor as not to warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs. The remedial directives shown on the enclosed plans are strictly of a temporary nature to insure safety. They are only effective if no additional loading is introduced beyond those required for current operations. Boiler room roof framing requires reinforcing. This engineer shall specify corrective work in the area while shoring operations are underway. We will be making periodic inspections to see that the drawing requirements are met, and keep you informed of same. If you need additional information, please advise. 1H 0 ReS/Jp�ectfuliy submit No. 6632 1 E N � ��• O Q. Robert M. Rumpf, FQ,STV, Robert M. Rumpf& L ESC? cc: Mr. Leo rsis -Trustee 9 Webb Street Salem; Massachusetts 01970 HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION Consultants in the Engineering Sciences 34 Rockland Street,Swampscott,MA 01907 781.581.2454 12 May 2000 City of Salem Public Property Department Building Department Re: Existing Conditions, 1-11 Cousins St., Former `Richard Leather Co., Inc. Building' Salem, MA Attention: Peter Strout, Building Commissioner Gentlemen: As you requested,today we made a visual survey of certain conditions at the building. We were accompanied by Commissioner Strout while others were present. The building walls are out-of-plumb with a visually-alarming lean toward Cousins St. Many of the interior timber columns show this same lean with associated distress to the timber beams they support. Much of the structure's interior framing is severely deteriorated, structurally inappropriate and unstable, or both. We consider the existing structure to be dangerously unstable and unsafe. High winds, ponding rain water or snow on the roofs, or ajar from heavy vehicular traffic could trigger a collapse. We consider that the structure is a hazard which could result in injury or death. Not only the public as a whole, but especially the residences on the opposite side of Cousins St. are at risk. Very truly, HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION William Loring Hobbs President M" ®. Frank D. DeFalco Principal c e eitp of *alm ,Alam5arbuzetto Department of Vublic :berbireo One 6alem Oreen (978) 745-9595 CfExt. 321 STANLEY I.BORNSTEIN,P.E. City Engineer _fax: (978) 745-5$77 Director of Public Services May 17, 2000 Peter Strout, Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Board of Survey, former Richards Leather, Webb St, Dear Peter: As you know,on May 12, 2000 I, along with yourself, Chief Turner,Inspector LaTulippe, and William Hobbs visited and inspected the above mentioned site. The purpose of our inspection was to determine the level of hazard that exists at the site and to determine whether or not the building could be salvaged. As a result of our inspection, I can say firmly that the level of hazard is extreme and that it is not possible to salvage the existing structure. During my inspection,I noted the almost total lack of lateral bracing in the structure. This feature makes the building inherently unstable, as noticed by the fact that the building is listing towards Cousins Street several inches. I also noticed that at some point,the roof trusses had their bottom chords removed and replaced with vertical posts, This will result in transferring the roof load from the outside walls to the columns below. On their best day, the columns below were not designed for that load. The columns that I saw were rotted severely and damaged by impact. Several floor joists were barely attached to their respective columns. Most connections were nailed and not bolted. I notice quite a bit of damage that appeared to be new. I saw several main carrying beams that were showing signs of recent failure. The added weight of the ice from this winter when the sprinkler system failed could be to blame. The flat roof on the Cousins Street side is supported on its upper end by a single 2x4 ledger board. This ledger has pulled away from the wall as much as a foot in places. The weight of a fire fighter would surely bring this roof down I am worried that when this roof collapses(which I believe is imminent)that it will displace the columns that support the main building. This would lead to instant structure failure. In short I believe that the structure is so dangerous and so close to failure as to pose an immediate threat to public safety. It is my opinion that the building should be razed immediately. I have not mentioned the obvious hazard of the electrical service and environmental hazard that exist. I would like to take this time to emplore the fire department to not enter the building, as it would surely lead to a tragedy. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Mi ael Collins, Assistant City Engineer a . . May-16-00 03:45pm From-SALEM FIRE DEPT ADMIN 9TO7434648 T-549 P.01102 F-196 .� City of Sakm, Massachusetts ire Deparmmt 48 Lafayette Street 7to6en W?urner Satem,MassaAL5etu 019703695 }ire Prevention TeL 978-744.1235 alwwu taiief 97&744-6990 Fax 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 May 15, 2000 Mr.Peter Strout, Inspector of Buildings City of Salem One Salem Green Salem,MA 01970 Dear Mr. Strout: On FYiday,May 12, 2000 I,together with Fire Marshal Charles Latulippe,participated in a Board of Survey with the Inspector of Buildings, the Assistant City Engineer and an independent structural engineer. The property being surveyed was located at #9 Webb Street and is a former leather-processing factory. Upon inspection of the property several structural deficiencies were noted to include altered trusses (bottom chord cut and removed), decayed and/or damaged structural members inchuding weight bearing columns,floor joists,wind bracing, stair stringers and support beams. There were several open, unprotected pits on the ground level which would present severe hazards to firefighters who,may enter the building in search of vagrants, the homeless or intruders, Holes had been cut on the floors above to facilitate the removal of machinery. These holes also present an unguarded hazard to rescue personnel and serve to facilitate the rapid spread of&e throughout the building. A quick look at the building from the outside reveals a structure in the process of premature collapse. Exterior walls are so far out of plumb the untrained eye could easily see the propensity of these walls for early collapse. This vacant factory is situated in a residential neighborhood in close proximity to several occupied dwellings of unprotected wood-frame construction. Should a fire occur in this " . MaY-16-QO 03:41am from-SALEt1 FIRE oEPT ADWIN 8787464646 T-648 P.dtlot f-186 dilapidated factory the entire neighborhood would be at significant risk of rapid fire spread and immediate danger to the occupants. There is a real possibility of a cordlagation should the right conditions occur. I stronglyrecomrncnd that this hazard be eliminated immediately in light of the condition of the building and the character of the immediate neighborhood, Sincerely, Robert W. Turner, Chief ofDcpartutem -A Cite of *arem, Aa!oarbuzett5 Public Propertp Mrpartment jguilbing Mepartment One balem Oreen (978) 745-9595(Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Copy January 25, 2000 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz c/o Bollick and Welch 32 Church Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Ms. Colitz: Due to numerous complaints and in response to neighborhood concern, I inspected the exterior of your property located at 1-11 Cousins Street. I have also been inside the building on several occasions. This department is concerned about continued deterioration of this property. As you are a probably aware, a structural report, conducted by Robert Rumpf and Associates dated January 1998,points out several structural problems. This report also summarizes; "The present condition of the building is so poor as to not warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs." The building is now two years older and still suffering from additional deterioration and the rotting problems caused by these leaks. Section 121 of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, allows a building official to declare a building unsafe structure if it is open to the weather, abandoned or if such structure would be especially unsafe in case of fire. This department and City of Salem Fire Department feel this building would be especially unsafe in case of fire. Therefore you are directed to begin the process to make safe or remove the structure. Please contact this office within ten{14} days upon receipt of this letter to discuss your plans for this building. Failure to respond will result in court action being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order you may appeal to the State Building Code Board of Appeals. Forms available at our office. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc: Mayor Usovicz Fire Prevention Councillor LaCava Polish Falcons Club of America I 66(l of M& 6� � eve.conmU 4eGora/z 6'. �ivr(riiie%aur 5 � ,:. y�ooz> �s September 29, 1999 Peter Strout, Building Inspector City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Strout: You are respectfully requested to appear before the City Council Committee on Public Health, Safety, and Environment on Wednesday, October 6 , 1999 at 7 : 00 P. M. in the Council Chamber for the purpose of discussing the enclosed. Very truly yours, kE HIIHAW Zz-. CITY CLERK Enclosure f CITY OF SALEM -66 m s In CitysCMmtor 9, 1999 i eted: That the owner of Richards Leather on Webb Street appear �re re the Committee on Public Health for a public hearing regarding health issues at that building. AND BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: that the abutters, owner, Building Inspector, and Fire Safety be invited. In City Council September 9, 1999 Adopted ATTEST: DEBORAH E. BURKINSHAW CITY CLERK 3 � � t�it�r of �ttlent, �ttttsttc�utt�t�tt Public Propertg Department Nuilbing Orpnrtment tine f3alrm Oreen 588-745-9595 fjd- 38II Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer July 9 , 1997 Richard Leather Co. Inc. 9 Webb Street Salem, Mass . 01970 Attention : Leo Zisis RE: 9 Webb Street Dear Mr . Zisis : On July 8 , 1997 , per the request of the City of Salem Health Department and some of your abutters, an inspection was conducted at 9 Webb St. on the existing condition of your factory. Per our conversation, you agreed to hire a structural engineer and perform any necessary structural repairs that he found would be required . He is also to file a report to my office in writing of his findings, and means of correction . This office intends on working closely with you to bring this building into State Building Code compliance . Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Leo E . Tremblay Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc: David Shea Health Department Fire Department Councillor Paskowski , Ward 1 s Titg of 1*ttlem, Massac4usetts Public Prn}tertg Mepartment lguilbing bepartmettt (One *alrm (Srern 508-745-9595 Ext. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer October 28 , 1997 Richard Leather Co. Inc . 9 Webb Street Salem, Mass . 01970 ATT: Leo Zisis RE: 9 Webb Street Dear Mr . Zisis : This office has been more than patient in waiting for a response from your structural engineer as to what precautions are being made to make the structure safe to enable continuing work to be performed in this building located at 9 Webb Street . This office considers this building unsafe for occupancy under the present condition. Please notify this department within fifteen ( 15 ) days upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violations . Failure to do will result tin legal action being taken . Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincer Leo E. Trembl,ay- Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc : David Shea Health Department Fire Department Councillor Paskowski , Ward 1 AREA CODE 978 TEL. 745.5440 P.O. BOX 868 TEL. 744-5686 RICHARD TANNING CO. , INC. FAX .744.4624 MANUFACTURERS OF ANTELO VELOUR GARMENT SUEDE 9 WEBB ST. — SALEM, MA 01970 Jan. 28 , 1998 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building RE; 9 Webb Street Dear Mr. Tremblay, We are requesting a building permit to address certain temporary repairs recommended by Robert M. Rumpf and Associates to enable continuing work to be performed at this location, until the end of June 1998 . It will be our intention at that time to determine if it will be economically viable to do permanent rep to the bui1din O--L- ;?7; xs cam= it Gy , a o Thank you for your continuing support in thi atter . Since ely, Leo Zi s HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION Consultants in the Engineering Sciences 34 Rockland Street,Swampscott,MA 01907 781.581.2454 12 May 2000 City of Salem Public Property Department Building Department Re: Existing Conditions, 1-11 Cousins St., Former `Richard Leather Co., Inc. Building' Salem, MA Attention: Peter Strout, Building Commissioner Gentlemen: As you requested, today we made a visual survey of certain conditions at the building. We were accompanied by Commissioner Strout while others were present. The building walls are out-of-plumb with a visually-alarming lean toward Cousins St. Many of the interior timber columns show this same lean with associated distress to the timber beams they support. Much of the structure's interior framing is severely deteriorated, structurally inappropriate and unstable, or both. We consider the existing structure to be dangerously unstable and unsafe. High winds, ponding rain water or snow on the roofs, or ajar from heavy vehicular traffic could trigger a collapse. We consider that the structure is a hazard which could result in injury or death. Not only the public as a whole, but especially the residences on the opposite side of Cousins St. are at risk. Very truly, HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION William Loring Hobbs President PPAW 0. WALM JD , �� ow MW a Frank D. DeFalco Principal ROBERT M. RUMPF & ASSOCIATES RE : REPORT OF ,SAS`+c #8002 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Structural Inspection �4? ROBERT 101 DERBY STREET Richard Tanning Co. M. �^ SalemMassachusetts 3 RUMPF , p SALEM, MASS.01970 NO. 6632Q 508-745.6596 FAX 508-745-6596 rS T6P`i �SSrOMAL 01107/98 Mr. Leo Tremblay Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 - by hand - REPORT re: Structural Inspection 9 Webb Street Leather Company Facility Salem Massachusetts This is a report on our inspection of the referenced building with full emphasis on occupants' safety. We believe that the present condition of the building is so poor as not to warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs. The remedial directives shown on the enclosed plans are strictly of a temporary nature to insure safety. They are only effective if no additional loading is introduced beyond those required for current operations. Boiler room roof framing requires reinforcing. This engineer shall specify corrective work in the area while Shoring operations are underway. We will be making periodic inspections to see that the drawing requirements are met, and keep you informed of same: If you need additional information, please advise. ASH 0 'j it E Re� / o. 6632 yG O Robert M. Rumpf, FoisTsa�t,��' Robert M. Rumpf& L�pC Cc: Mr. Leo titis-Trustee 9 Webb Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 I - z 4 x IT5 12" O.G. 00" off tFeg area Wo tionable roof capacity 8 x 12 Deam 4 x 12 Seamy '?lair Well Well I Concrete 51ab •.— ti-- ?_ WI8'S boiler 2 x 8'S 24" o:c. -- PooM .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . SII 1 Drickpartitioin zupporting roof ridge above Dodw room roof requires 7—rrovide thg co�amnreirrforrangha2 x 8'S 18" o.c. Wei fastened on tl�ae S. two drainstoprevent now V x & coknm deep G channels ruep)q�ared h Robert M. Rumpf & Associates First Floor - 1 / 16 " scale _ ?�,F,,1" OF44sq� Drawing # ER Consulting Civil Structural Engineers Richard Tanning Co. "OB aMMPF y� f M. • 9' ' 9 g Date: 1J8/98 -' Exl No. 6632 101 Derby Street Phone/Fax - (978) 745-6596 Salem, Massachusetts q��QISTEP��a Salem, MA 01970 Project # 8m2- MAL EN4 6606 off OVAM to this area 8 X 12 beams W" 'i°' con& med. r 4 x 12 Beams i Mair Roof Below V x 6' namfuial lumber Well w 20' .�. I I Roof Below Roof f5elow rgt, Elev.. Drick Ghimney Robert M. Rumpf & Associates Second Floor - 1 / 16 " Scale �1% OFAf. qo Drawing # �' 9 Date: 1✓8✓98 ROBERT yc Consulting Civil - Structural Engineers M. Ex2 $ RUMPf Richard Tanning Co. No. 6632 101 Derby Street Phone/Fax - (978) 745-6596 Salem Massachusetts �'opFO, a��W� Salem, MA 01970' ' Project # 8wz SF's/o NAL�� F 3 - 13/4* x 1 718' LVL on 2 x 10.3 a 24" o.c. top of roof and bolted to beam underneci'h Truss I I � I I fl8800uhirthidfloor t roof I m Roof Delow ti o I o 0 0 o I I a o 0 o I y4' x 6' purling w 32' ox. I Li I i Roof F3elow L - - - - - - - - - - - _J 4 x 12'y Load bearing wall removed w 2' Q o4. for more than 20' Reinforce roof rafters with 2" x 47 stud wall where missing w V O.C. Robert M. Rumpf & Associated Third Floor - 1116 " kale ?��ROBER Ss4� Drawing # Consult✓ng Civil '- Structural Engineers Date: 1!8/98 ROPF MERT �� Richard Tanning Co. 062 101 Derby Street Phone/Fax - (978) 7415-6596 Salem, Massachusetts ��Q<oI TEPA?�W� Salem, MA 01970 Project # 8002 ass/pNAL4 ♦ rr r ,ns' KK 4 10 �E A v K �y 060 o W a ,x"Sr 66gt'� r q'•� �� '� r r r i b k W` 10 r r tx ,gyp ♦� yam` 2 .�1 �,� ou 460 vo yn'' 'osYds°\ FA Vk Ct tJ Y 1 t.x ,Xt1L q M t euu., a 'pa/ Z.• OniT "WY' .7A y�3 ' h L w ./ akwz,1 JL"ad&� � 6� � 3 6lerk 0'6'91x16 September 29, 1999 z Peter Strout, Building Inspector City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Strout: You are respectfully requested to appear before the City Council Committee on Public Health, Safety, and Environment on Wednesday, October 6, 1999 at 7 : 00 P. M. in the Council Chamber for the purpose of discussing the enclosed. Very truly yours, EBORAH E . BURKIN HAW ' CITY CLERK Enclosure O T n CITY OF SALEM �Linq� In CjtyS4Do%ajMr 9, 1999 9 r ,�,�eyed: That the owner of Richards Leather on Webb Street appear e ore the Committee on Public Health for a public hearing regarding health issues at that building. AND BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: that the abutters, owner, Building Inspector, and Fire Safety be invited. In City Council September 9, 1999 Adopted ATTEST: DEBORAH E. BURKINSHAW, CITY CLERK Cameron &Rumpf A/E architecture,engineering, &construction consulting Box 8433 Salem,Massachusetts 01971 (508)744-7200 (508)7444661 fax October 23, 1997 Mr. Leo Tremblay Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 -- by hand -- PRELIMINARY REPORT - tructural urvey, Report, Reinforcing Design 9 Webb eet Leather Company Facility Salem, Massachusetts FOR: As-built schematic framing survey and drawing of existing industrial wood building structure at the referenced address; structural reinforcing design development and drawings where required; and reporting to the Salem Building Department, and supervision of temporary reinforcing and rehabilitation as necessary for structure to remain secure for occupancy until July 1 1998. We have observed the existing conditions and noted the following preliminary comments for your information: 1s'Floor Many of the columns in the first floor area are out of plumb, and several diminished in size by rotting to the extent that they might compromise integrity. These need to be detailed and assessed on a per case basis. Also, at some point posts were moved to accommodate machines resulting in possible underdesign of joist framing. There is a racking occurring in some of the external walls such as the left side of the building which might compromise the strength of the 2"d and 3rd floor framing and/or shed roofs above. Some means of lateral bracing could be required to prevent further racking. The roof over boiler room (back right corner) has standing water most of the time. The ridge beam and roof joists show signs of rot. In this case the ridge is supported by an existing brick wall, but the sway in the joists is causing the pool of rainwater on the roof. In addition the plaster ceiling hung from the back portion of the same room is falling down and should be completely removed as it currently is in danger of falling. The roof over office on left side of building is soft in places and needs to be examined more closely. 2nd Floor The roof over the "locker rooms" (second floor, back of building - rooms with concrete slab floor) is under designed and complete failure of at least one member can be seen. Metal plates over floor indicate possible need for replacement of floor. Page 1 of 2 Continued i L ' Preliminary Report Page 2 of 2 Mr. Leo Tremblay October 23, 1997 3I Floor A reassessment is required of the truss system for the main roof, more specifically those trusses (in the front of the building) which have been cut to accommodate drying rack system, and places where truss members have been removed to accommodate piping - also how the weight of the rack system, which is suspended from rafters/roof affects the trusses' capacity. Assess placement of columns under removed trusses (not lined up with columns below). An area of concern is a former load bearing wall in the back right corner of building. Most of this has been removed at some point in the building's history, resulting in an underdesigned roof, which should be addressed before snow loading. Miscellaneous The roof of the main stairwell may need replacement roof, due to underdesign. Also, significant rotting of many structural members in the outside walls needs to be investigated and addressed. We have devised as-built drawings of the structure to scale; next week, we anticipate the beginning of our remedial designs. If you require additional information, please advise. Respectfu y s Itt Robert M. Rumpf, Robert M. Rumpf & ssociates 1 , BETA Engineering, Inc. f Engineers • Scientist • Planners Mr. Peter Strout, Director Statement Date: 2/02/01 Dept. of Public Properties BETA Job#: 1805 One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Balance Due: $22,163.86 STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT Invoice Date Invoice Invoice Amount Amount Payment Balance # Date Period Covered Billed Paid Rec'd Due f thrU 6/02/00 29,349.5" 29,3049.51 1r 114/1.0 2 7/21/00 6/03/00 - 6/30/00 7,368.06 7,368.06 8/21/00 3 10/02/00 7/01/00 - 9/22/00 12,115.76 12,115.76 4 10/24/00 9/23/00 - 10/13/00 5,205.63 5,205.63 5 11/27/00 10/14/00 - 11/17/00 3,886.98 3,886.98 6 12/27/00 11/18/00 - 12/22/00 955.49 955.49 �. Total billed-to-date = 58,881.43 Total PAID-to-date = 36,717.57 Total Balance Due= $22,163.86 If you have any questions, please call Project Manager or Diane Letendre at the number below. BETA: phone#: (401)333-2382 FAX#: (401)333-9225 Please Remit Payment To: BETA Group, Inc. 6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln, RI 02865 RHODE ISLAND MASSACHUSETTS CONNECTICUT 6 Blackstone Valley Place,Lincoln,RI 02865 1420 Providence Highway,Suite 117,Norwood,MA 02062 88D Howard Street,New London,CT 06320 401333.2382 fax:401.333.9225 781.255.1982 fax:781255.1974 860.437.0239 fax:860.4440274 BETA®BETA-eng.com BETA®BETA-eng.com BETAInfoSys.com DOCUMENT ID �A TRANS DEPT R/ORGNUMBER �\ THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PV "' AccrG PRD BUD Fv OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER ACTION: (E) SCH PAY DATE OFF LAB ACCT � � PAYMENT VOUCHER INPUT FORM (M) DEPARTMENT/ORGANIZATION NAME DOCUMENT �aNR a REFERENCED ORDER DESCRIPTION n€„ `a" G^ �,.'. e u d 'a T.�g -'i"R^a' a a✓s: a'� y, tib '' 'e,,"ta''I `v as .� ma s $ R2EF`B�eE,MRENpC'�.s.=E;�S D ORe�De Ld,E TRANS DEPT R/ORG ODEPT APPRNRPTG FUND BS ACCT DEPT VENDOR INVOICE NUMBER: P SUB s OR�=G,. S/0.,O�z��.RG O"",B"JaeteS"�/O�.—B.`.�J NUMBER � ' I DESCRIPTION: MSA if LN # DISC DATES OF SERVICE QUANTITY t0 NI: TO TO THE COMPTROLLER OF THE.COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS: 1 hereby cenity, under the penalties of perjury that all laws of the Commonwealth governing disbursements of puUhc funds and the regulations thereof have been complied with and observed, PREPARED BY: �—�----- TITLE: APPROVED BY: ---�— DATE: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDOR: TITLE: FILL IN SHADED AREAS ENTERED BY: - DATE: DIRECT INQUIRIES TO TITLE: _ .STATE ORGANIZATION CD-PV DATE: RETAIN GOLDENROD COPY PAGE_ OF AUG 11 2000 1434 FR TCPO-CONST SERV 617 727 4043 TO 819787409846 P.01i13 � eJ�te �anznxaye�u�ea� � � o V/W U4M4PN#"d Bye �i e�loce ' � u61 �16a ox�ae ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI MPHENRCROBBY Xd (W) 722-4050 BECnETAFMADMINIIDN JANE SWIFT 9= 04 7) 727-58W A FINANCE UEUTENAW eDMRtOOR - DAVID B.PERIM F.AX IRANSNIISSIQN SI�ET WMMl°S�NER DATE: August 11,2000 TO: Peter Strout.Building QpMraissioner FAX k (978)740-9846 FROM: George M.Matthews PHONE#: (978)745-9595x385 Associate General Counsel Number of Pages:i3 (including covet sheet) Comments: Emergency Waiver of Advertising Requirements Richard Leather Building 1-11 -Cousins Street Salem.MA,Demolition of Bldg. As requested is an assigned emergency waiver,number concerning the above mentioned matter. If I can be of further assistance do not hesitate to contact me. The documents accompanying this facsimile transmission contain information from the Division of Capital Asset Management which maybe confidential andlorprivileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not.the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,distribution or use of the contents of this infomration is prohibited.if you have received this facsimile in error,please notify us by Selephone immediately: Thank you. **#iiitkk\#rt9irk*i*\d\\\k\kkkt**t#k####4k!ttk*kkF*#d#i*##kt##WWWkkk*d*R*\X+Xkk\t+R*ti Pikkki#♦ 8 AUG-10-00 04 -39 PM SALEM BUILDING DEP 978 740 9846 P. 02 - Citp of balem, Anzatbuzetto - 10 Publit Propertp Mtpartment I3uilbing 32epartment Ona&AWM Orem (978) 745.9595 or"xt.380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. George Mathews Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance I Ashburton Place Room 1505 Boston, Ma. 02108 Dear Mr. Mathew's: As per our conversation today relative to the"Richard Leather Building" at 1-11 Cousins St. in Salem. After numerous complaints front neighbors concerned about the condition of the above mentioned building and a structural report that states the need for extensive Structural repairs, the City Of Salem and the building department conducted a board of survey in accordance with the Mass.Building code and found the building to be in serious condition. At that time I invoked 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As the code reads the owner has the ability to make the building safe or remove the structure,this did not happen. At this point the City Of Salem has the right to retain a demolition firm and remove the building. Enclosed you will find some of the pertinent correspondence we have had with the owners. This is a serious condition and needs to be dealt with immediately, *Stncerellr04, Emergency Waiver of advertising u# requirements under MGL c.149 Building Commissioner sec.44j (6) is hereby granted on�U Qt K Co Qef. u� �a 04114 "George M. Matthews, Associate General Counsel Emergency Waiver No. . fbr R SUMMARY Beta Engineering Inc.,retained Smith& Wessel Associates,Inc. to conduct an inspection for asbestos-containing building materials(ACBM)at the former Richard's Leather Company in Salem,Massachusetts. Certified asbestos inspectors representing Smith& Wessel conducted the inspection on May 12 and May 15, 2000. Reportedly the tannery building was constructed in the early 1900s; an office addition was added on at a later date. The tannery building is a three-story wood structure with an attached single-story brick structure used for offices. The building has been unoccupied for several years and is deteriorated in some locations. The purposes of the inspection were to evaluate the types,locations, and extent of suspect ACBM in the building and to provide appropriate recommendations for its abatement. Our inspection addressed both friable materials (materials that can be easily crumbled, crushed, or pulverized by hand pressure) and nonfriable suspect materials throughout the building. We performed the inspection for suspect ACBM in accordance with EPA's National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Title 40 CFR Part 61. We identified both friable and nonfriable ACBM in the building including: boiler breech insulation,pipe insulation,pipe insulation debris, caulking,linoleum floor sheeting, cementitious ceiling plaster,window glazing, floor tile and underlying mastic adhesive, boiler gaskets, boiler rope, asbestos-cement(transite)siding and asphaltic roof materials. We have included CAD field drawings of the building as Appendix B. The CAD field drawings are for informational purposes only and should not be used to quantify materials or pinpoint material locations. 1. SCOPE OF WORK Our evaluation included a visual inspection of readily accessible and observable areas. We addressed mechanical areas and associated systems, manufacturing spaces, storage areas, office areas,rest rooms and common areas. Destructive testing was perfonned to access areas behind fixed walls,above fixed ceilings and under floorboards. We did not inspect inside mechanical equipment or within inaccessible utility trenches. We inspected for the following types of suspect ACBM: • Thermal system insulation, such as insulation on pipes,boilers and related equipment; • Surfacing material, such as fireproofing applied to structural components, acoustical and decorative plasters, and other sprayed or troweled applications; and • Miscellaneous materials, such as ceiling tiles, floor tiles, and blown-in insulation. To determine the asbestos content of suspect ACBM we collected and analyzed representative bulk samples. Bulk samples were collected by extracting a small but representative portion of suspect material from the substrate. The samples, typically Smrm B WmEL AssociA=, INC. SWA 00141 .. Page 1 5/30100 measuring one cubic centimeter, were collected using a variety of methods. A knife with a lockable blade was used to collect samples of wallboard,baseboard, roofing materials and other rigid materials. A hammer and chisel were used to collect samples of floor tile. The extracted samples were then placed into individual plastic sealed baggies for transport to the laboratory. Samples were collected with discretion, so as to minimize potential fiber release and to prevent damage to building finishes. Where roofing materials were sampled,we patched the sample locations with nonasbestos containing roofing cement. Scilab Boston, Inc. of Weymouth, Massachusetts, and ProScience Analytical Services of Woburn, Massachusetts analyzed the samples,both fully accredited asbestos analytical laboratories. The laboratories used Polarized Light Microscopy(PLM), in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F,Appendix A,to analyze the samples. Because PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar nonfriable organically bound materials,when a negative(less than one percent asbestos)result is obtained by PLM, analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy(TEM)may be necessary to obtain a more accurate result. Limitations We did perform intrusive investigations for thermal system insulations and other suspect materials that may be present behind fixed walls, above fixed ceilings and under floorboards. However, we did not access all utility trenches as steel covers made this impossible. In addition,we did not perform demolition of mechanical equipment to determine if interior components contain suspect asbestos. Further exploratory testing of the interior of these components is recommended prior to demolition to determine if these components contain asbestos materials such as gaskets,ropes or refractory. 2. REGULATORY GUIDANCE The United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Occupational Health& Safety Administration(OSHA), MA Department of Labor and Workplace Development Division of Occupational Safety (DOS) and MA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)are responsible for regulating the release of asbestos into the environment and protecting workers from exposure to airborne asbestos fibers. OSHA and MA DOS are responsible for the health and safety of workers who may be exposed in connection with their jobs including asbestos abatement. The EPA and MA DEP are responsible for developing and enforcing regulations necessary to protect the general public from airborne contaminants that are known to be hazardous to human health. OSHA and the MA DOS are responsible for the health and safety of workers who may be exposed to asbestos in connection with their jobs, including asbestos abatement, maintenance and custodial activities, and renovation work. They specify requirements for the work practices and engineering controls that must be utilized during asbestos abatement projects. They also require that ACBM be repaired,removed, or otherwise Smn7/H W6ssn AssociArrs,/Nc. SWA 00141 Page 2 5/30/00 appropriately abated before maintenance,renovation,or demolition work disturbs them. Thermal system insulation,surfacing materials, and floor tile installed before 1980 must be presumed to be ACBM(PACM)unless appropriate inspection and sampling analysis proves otherwise. The EPA regulates ACBM associated with renovation, demolition, and asbestos abatement projects via the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)regulation(Title 40, CFR Part 61). This regulation requires that buildings be inspected for ACBM prior to renovation/demolition projects. It stipulates that all friable ACBM as well as nonfhable ACBM that are in poor condition or will be made friable by renovation activity be removed or otherwise appropriately abated before they are disturbed. 3. FINDINGS We observed several different types of suspect ACBM. These included:wall and ceiling cement plaster, window glazing,window caulking, linoleum floor sheeting,floor file and associated mastic adhesive, 12"x12" spline ceiling tiles, pipe insulation,pipe insulation debris,boiler breech insulation,boiler gaskets,boiler rope,window caulking, seam caulking,transite shingles, baseboard and associated mastic adhesive and asphaltic roof materials. We collected a total of 74 representative bulk samples of the above materials, of which 59 were analyzed by PLM(see Appendix A). Analytical results of the bulk samples collected by Smith&Wessel Associates indicate that the following materials tested positive for asbestos(i.e. over I%of total makeup): • Black mastic adhesive underlying blue 12"xl2" floor file(sample#RL-04A) • Black mastic adhesive underlying beige 12"x12" floor file(sample#RL-07A) • Green 9"x 9" floor tile(sample#RL-08A) • Gray transite siding(sample#RL-I OA,RLR-01A,-RLR-02A) • Black 9"x 9" floor file(sample#RL-I IA) • Black linoleum floor sheeting(sample#RL-13A) • Black asphalt shingle (sample#'s RLF-04A, RLF-04h • White window caulking(sample#RLR-06A) • Corrugated paper-type pipe insulation(sample#RL-17A) • White ceiling cement plaster(sample#RL-20A) • Gray boiler breech insulation(sample#RL-21 A) • White residual insulation on pipes(sample#RL-23A) • Asphaltic roof felt materials(sample#'s RLR-8A,RLR-9A,RLR-1 OA) • Black asphalt roof flashing(sample#RLR-11A) • Black caulking on shingle (sample#RLR-13A) • Gray caulking on siding of roof 3 (sample#RLR-14A) Boiler gasket and rope insulation were assumed to be ACBM. Smrw @ West Assocu7w, Im SWA 00141 Page 3 5/30/00 We have listed in Table 1 the location and estimated quantity,by square foot(sf), linear foot(If),or other appropriate unit, of each type of ACBM identified at the site. A�L7 *�;,List Of�Mater�a�,ls�TesttngPosrttwe�sor Ashes t Type of Material Location Quantity i Black mastic adhesive and associated Office area rooms 1,2 and lobby area 735 sf blue 12"x12"floor tile Black mastic adhesive and associated Office area room 3 and corridor and rest 320 sf beige 12"x12"floor tile rooms Green 9"x 9"floor tile Office area room 4 144 sf Black 9"x 9"floor tile Tannery first floor side entrance,room 5, 540sf room 6 j Black linoleum floor sheeting and Tannery second floor rear storage room 275 sf underlying tar paper and mastic adhesive Corrugated paper-type pipe insulation First floor tannery near office area,second 3 if floor tannery near stairwell White cement ceiling plaster Boiler room ceiling 500 sf Pipe insulation debris and contaminated Boiler room 20 cu' soil Gray boiler breech insulation Boiler room 80 sf Tan boilerasket Boiler room g 10 sf Boiler rope gasket debris Boiler room floor 10 if White residual insulation on pipe Various locations throughout tannery 150 if Black asphalt siding shingles Exterior of tannery 500 sf White window caulking between window Exterior of tannery 145 windows and wood frame opening Black caulking on skylight(six total) On upper tannery roof 100 sf Gray caulk seam where stairwell Driveway side of tannery 10 sf enclosure meets main roof of tannery — Gray transite siding On interior wall near garage area 30 sf Gray transite siding Exterior of tannery building 20,000 sf Black asphalt roof felts Tannery roofs 7,350 sf Black asphalt roof flashing Tannery roofs 1,100 sf Smnm B WEssEL Assocuny,Inc. SWA 00141 Page 4 5/30/00 In Table 2,all materials that tested negative for asbestos are listed, including the locations where these materials were observed and the corresponding bulk sample reference number(s). s ,�, s � `l�` �� TABLEZ •Ltst O#Materials rfesbng Negattve3For slsest� FF. Type of material Locations)observed Sample numbers) White cement plaster skim coat Office area RL-01A,RL-01B, RL-01C,RL-01D, RL-0113,RL-01F, j RL-01G Gray cement plaster base coat Office area RL-02A,RL-02B, RL-02C,RL-01D, RL-01E,RL-0117, RL-01G Blue 12"xl2"floor tile(see note 1) Office area room#2 and lobby RL-03A,RL-03B area White spline 12"x12"ceiling file Office area room#3,and Ladies' RL-05A,RL-05B, rest room Beige 12"x12"floor file(see note 1) Office area room#3 and corridor RL-06A,RL-06B Black mastic adhesive underlying green 9"x 9" Office area room#4 RL-09A,RL-09B floor the Black mastic adhesive underlying black 9"x 9" Office area room#4 RL-12A,RL-12B, floor file RL-12C White fibrous debris on floor . Tannery second floor open area RL-15A,RL-15B Gray cement base coat ceiling plaster(see note 2) Tannery boiler room ceiling RL-20A,RL-20B White surfaced asphalt siding shingles Sections of tannery exterior walls RLR-03A,RLR- 03B Black tar paper under black asphalt siding Sections of tannery exterior walls RLR-05A,RLR- shingles 05B Gray window glazing Tannery building RLR-07A,RLR- 07B Black asphalt roof shingle Office roof RLR-15A,RLR- 15B Black asphalt tar paper(see note 3) Office roof RLR-16A,RLR- 16B Black asphalt roof felt Front roof of tannery near Cousins RLR-17A Street Black asphalt roof flashing(see note 3) Front roof of tannery near Cousins RLR-18A Street Black tar paper under clapboard Front of tannery RLR-19A,JMR 21A smnN&WES.SEL ASSOCIATES,INC. SWA 00141 Page 5 5/30100 I ..2nf.,. P ' INS i TABLE 2 t•Ltst Of MatenalsT stingrNegatrve Fbi`Asbestos ; Type of material Location(s)observed Sample II number(s) Gray cement coating on exterior foundation Office area RLR-22A,RLR- 22B i Note 1: These materials must be handled as ACBM due to cross-contamination by mastic adhesive. Note 2: Gray cement base coat must be handled as ACBM due to cross-contamination from white cement I skim coat. Note 3:PLM analytical results indicate this material contains a trace percent of asbestos(<1%asbestos)as part of composite,TEM analysis is recommended. 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On the basis of our findings, we offer the following conclusions and recommendations: 1. Both friable and nonfriable ACBM were identified at the site. Before any building renovation or demolition activities are conducted that impact ACBM,their removal or other appropriate abatement will be necessary. A licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor in accordance with a project design prepared by a certified Abatement Project Designer must conduct abatement of friable materials and nonfriable materials that will be made friable. 2. Asbestos containing asphaltic roof materials may be removed after the building is demolished. However,the materials cannot be sawed, sanded, ground, cut or drilled during the demolition process. The roofing materials must not be compacted or. incinerated. In addition, all provisions of DEP Policy Statement Concerning Non- Friable Asbestos Containing Materials (Policy#BWP-96-012)must be adhered to. 3. Although our inspection was fairly comprehensive, some areas were not accessible, includingcovered trenches in the floor. An suspect materials that are uncovered Y P during renovation or demolition that was not identified during the inspection should be handled as ACBM until additional testing proves otherwise. 4. Interior mechanical components may contain asbesto"uch as gaskets, ropes, fiberboards, refractory, and the like. Further inspections of these systems may be necessary utilizing intrusive sampling techniques before dismantling them. Otherwise they should be assumed to have asbestos containing materials in them that require removal by properly trained abatement personnel within fully contained abatement work areas. 5. COST ESTIMATES We have provided estimates of the costs to remove the ACBM that we identified. These estimates are based on current industry standards for asbestos abatement work conducted in buildings that are occupied during abatement. Abatement costs may fluctuate rapidly based on a variety of factors: the prevailing economic climate, seasonal differences, union smnN&WESSEL ASSOC/AMS,INC. SWA 00141 Page 6 5/30/00 labor considerations, scale of the abatement, occupancy of the building, and so on. We recommend that qualified abatement contractors be solicited to determine actual pricing involved.In addition to pricing for abatement,we have considered anticipated industrial hygiene costs associated with abatement, including air monitoring and oversight of the abatement. i For removal of Black mastic adhesive and associated 12"xl2" 1,055 sf @ 2/sf $ 2,110. floor tile 9"x 9" floor file on concrete 684 sf @ 1.5/sf 1,026. Black linoleum floor sheeting, associated tar 275 sf @ 5/sf 1,375. paper and mastic Corrugated paper-type pipe insulation 3 If @ 50/If 150. White cement ceiling plaster 500 sf @ 81sf 4,000. Pipe insulation and contaminated debris pile 2 yd' @ 400/yd' 800. Boiler breech insulation 80 sf @ 15/sf 1,200. Boiler demolition to access ACBIv1 I boiler @ 3,500/boiler 3,500. White residual pipe insulation 1501f @ 10/If 1,500. Exterior black asphalt shingles 500 sf @ 6/sf 3,000. White window caulk 145 windows @ 10,875. 75/each Black skylight caulking 100 sf @ 8/sf 800. Gray exterior caulk -,_10 sf @ 20/sf 200. Gray transite siding 20,030 sf @ 1.5/sf 30,000. Black asphalt roof felts _1,350 sf @ 4/sf 29,400. Black asphalt roof flashing 1,100 sf @ 4/sf 4,400. TOTAL ABATEMENT FEE(CONTRACTOR $ 94,336. TOTAL INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES FEE 9,000. TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $ 103,336. Smim 6 W"sEL Amoc/Anx,/Nc SWA 00141 Page 7 5/30= AK 1. 2000 3:30PI BETAENGINEEBINki 1;0, 6990 P, 2 CC 5 T i L 40 P S " ANY L I NO C a I N G , REVISED August 1,20M Original(June b, 2000) ATTN: Mr. Mite Cai9er P: 401-333-2392 Beta Engineering F:401-333-4225 6 Blackstone Valley Place linoola,Ma. 02865 FROM: Daniel T. Costello P: 508-946.0880 Costello Dismantling Co.Inc. F:$08-947-3043 2 Rocky Clutter St. Middleboro,Ma. 02346 Project: Richards Leather Salem,Ala. PROPOSAL Costello Dismantling Company Inc. is pleased to provide a quotation fbr the Demolition services required for the above project in Salem,Ma. We will supply all labor,materials,equipment and insurance to fully and finally complete the work as specified in the demolition specification section with the conditions as noted in this proposal. We are fully insured for$10,000,000.00 of General liability coverage. Our concern fbr safety extends to every aspect of our company as we rely heavily on otu excavatots which are equipped with a variety of attachments.All of our labor force have been certified with 40 hour OSHA training and OSHA Competent Person training 29 CFR 1926.All salvage shall be credited to Costello Dismantling Co.,Inc We have visited the she and are aware of the current access conditions_ Our scope of work will include the followia$t 1. Prepare Demolition Plan and Schedule 2. Assist with all state and local permits required for start up. 3. Ensure safe passage of people around demolition area 4. Remove the brick chimney down to grade,foundations 2 feet below grade. 5. Selectively dismantle a three story wood building formally used as a leather processing building. 6. Completely remove the concrete slab on grade. 7. Remove foundations walls down to 2 fact below grade. 8. All concrete will be crushed on site and will be graded on site. 4. Remove and legally dispose of all demolition debris at an offsite location 10. Any steel components coated with lead-based paint are exempt from the general hazardous waste recycling rules when they are handled as salvage scrap metal eventually recycled to a amelter. 3 M@ C M • O V T I A @ f .4 f C T M i Y@ L 6 tl 0 M C M n 9 C A C M 0 C e T T@ 0@ b @ 0 4 a ➢ t1 - n N 0 0 1 , n 0 tt . t $ 9 x a a . s w Y 5 r, u 9 10 3Wd 9NIIDMS2C OTUISOD £686L96805T L8:91 609VTS/8e AUG. 1. 2000 3:30PM BETAENGINEEi:ING: No, 699E Y, 3 h 4` COSTELLO DISMANTLING PROPOSAL Richards Leather PAGE 11, Sufficiently wet construction materials during our operations t0 reduce dust,if required. This Proposal DOES NOT INCLUDE: a) Any handling or disposal of any hazardous materials(asbestos, lead paint,Oils,PCBs, contaminated soils,etc.). b) Any utility pipe removal,relocation, or capping. c) Any excavation,backfill, compaction,earthwork,loaming, or seeding. d) Any new paving,grading,or site improvements other than using the crushed concrete, c) Any new fencing or barricades. f) Any concrete saweutting or caro drilling. g) Any 10081 fire or police department details_ h) Any now oonstruction. i) Any electrical pole removal or relocation. Beta Engineering or Owner shall; 1. Provide continuous access to the jobsite for equipment access, container loading, and emergency egress. 2, Pay for all demolition permits and all other local approvals for Start-up. 3. Disconnect, relocate and cap utilities. 4. Identify and locate on available plans and in the field, any underground piping which may remain. 6. Locate and maintain active hydrant for dust control and fire suppression. Detailed Cost Proposal BUILDING DEMOLITION............$154,000.00 (One Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand Dollars) ASBESTOS ABATEMENT.............. S 80,1100.00 (Eighty Thousand Dollars) COSTELLO DISMANTLING CO.,DW. L0 bbd WIJ.M61C 071-i1500 660E406889i L0 9t 000E/t2/8B AP TION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT ASA DOCUMENT 6702 Page one of Two Pages ` PROJECT: Former Richards Leather Company Project CONTRACT NO: Salem, MA TO:(OWNER) Dept. Of Public Properties CONTRACTOR: Costello Dismantling Co., Inc. One Salem Green 2 Rocky Gutter Street Salem, MA 01970-3794 Middleboro MA 42346-3509 Our Proj. #: 2KO23 Atm: Peter Strout. APPLICATION DATE: 01-Dec-00 APPLICATION NOt 4-retainage PERIOD FROM: 30-Nov-00 TO: 01-Dec-00 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved ADDITIONS S DEDUCTIONS S Application is made for Payment,as shown below,in connection with the Contract. - in previous months by _ Continuation sheet,AIA Document G703,is attached. - Owner— TOTAL 16,182.34 0.00 The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: - Subsequent Change Orders Number Approved ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.........................................................i:: 231,000.00 Net Change by Change Orders..........».........................................::.:: 18,182.34 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE..........................................................I.... 247,182.34 TOTAL COMPLETED&STORED TO DATE.................................. 2470182.34 RETAINAGE . .................................................................................v...:.; ,... 0.00 TOTALEARNED...»......»................«........».......................«..a..1....... ;; ,247,182.34 TOTALS: 16,182.34 0.00 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT....................::. '234,823.22 Net Change by Change Orders: 16,182.34 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE................................................................:` 12,359.12 State of Massachusetts County of:Plymouth The undersigned Contractor cmilies that the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accmdanee with the Contract Documents,that all ammmts have been paid by him for Work fix which previous Cenirreams for Payment were issued and payments received tear the owner,and that the correct payment shown herein is now dm, Contractor: 90kTELLO DISMANTLING CO., INC. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of 50 20 C/I) By: Daniel T.Castello,President 34Nov-00 ata Public, 7 44DIZIonlinnissioliEx i es In accordance with the Contract and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. . OWNER ARCHITECT Ey. CONTRACTOR This certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein,payment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under the Contract Atffl (CATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMDOCUMEN7G702 Page One of Two Pages PROJECT: Former Richards Leather Company Project CONTRACT NO: Salem, MA TO:(OWNER) Dept. Of Public Properties CONTRACTOR: Costello Dismantling Co.,Inc. One Salem Green 2 Rocky Gutter Street Salem,MA 01970-3794 Middleboro MA 02346-3509 Our Proj. #: 2KO23 Attn: Peter Strout APPLICATION DATE: 30-Nov-00 APPLICATION NO: 3 PERIOD FROM: 31-Oct-00 TO: 30-Nov-00 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved - ADDITIONS S DEDUCTIONS S Application is made for Payment,as shown below,in connection with the Contract. in previous months by Continuation sheet,AIA Document 0703,is attached. Owner— TOTAL 16,182.34 0.00 The present status of the account for this Contract is m follows: Subsequent Change Orders Number Approved ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM............................................................. 231,000.00 Net Change by Change Orders.»_.......................................:............. 16,182.34 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE................................................................ 247,182.34 TOTAL COMPLETED&STORED TO DATE.................................. 247,182.34 RETAINAGE ......................................................».......................... 12,359.12 TOTALEARNED.................................................................................. 234,823.22 TOTALS: 16,182.34 0.00 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES POR PAYMENT....................... 112,168.72 Net Change by Change Orders: 16,182.34 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE................................................................. 122,654.50 State of Massachusetts County of.Plymouth The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Application for Patment has been completed in auordance with the Comoct Documents,that all ainmus have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received Som the owner,and that the cunent payment shown herein is naw due. Contractor: OSTELLO DISMANTLING CO., INC. Subscribed and Swom to before me this . day of/ ` 20 41?,- By: trB : Daniel T_Costello,President 30-Nov-00 N g Public MX cofres: In accordance with the Contract and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR By: This certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein,payment and acceptance aro without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under the Contract. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AM DOWNEW6702 Page One of Two Pages PROJECT: Former Richards Leather Company Project CONTRACT NO: Salem, MA TO:(OWNER) Dept. Of Public Properties CONTRACTOR: Costello Dismantling Co.,Inc. One Salem Green 2 Rocky Gutter Street Salem, MA 01970-3794 Middleboro MA 42346-3504 Our Proj. #: 2KO23 Attn: Peter Strout APPLICATION DATE: 31-Oct-00 APPLICATION NO: 2 PERIOD FROM: 30-Sep-00 TO: 31-Oct-00 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved ADDITIONS$ DEDUCTIONS$ Application is made for Payment,as shown below,in conation with the Contract. in previous months by Continuation sheet,AIA Document G703,is attached. Owner.,. - TOTAL 0.00 0.00 The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: Subsequent Change Orders Number Approved ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................................... 231,000.00 1 16,182.34 Net Change by Change Orders...........»......................................... 16,182.34 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE............................................................ . 247,182.34 TOTAL COMPLETED&STORED TO DATE............................... 118,072.34., RETAINAGE ............................................................................... 5,903.62 TOTAL EARNED.............................................................................. 112,168.72 TOTALS: 16,182.34 0.00 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT..................... 54,435.00 Net Change by Change orders: 16,182.34 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE.................................................I........... 57,733.72 State of Massachusetts County of..Plymouth The radersigaed COnbaCtor certi5es that the Work covered by this Applimnon fmPayumm has bxn con>plemd inacmrdatae with the Contract Docsmhcars,am all amounts have been paid by him for Work Oa which previom Ceruaraws for Payment ware issued and payments mceived time the owner,and lord tthe aatent payaw9rt strown thaeio is rhowdm. Contractor: COSTELLO DISMANTLING CO.,INC. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this S/,.adie- day of aC4"- 2061V B . Dis Cote 1estdent G c' 8t Cfer 00 N Public mm Ex it In accordance with the Contract and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR By: This certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payce named herein,payment and acceptance am without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Connector under the Contract. APPLICATION AND..CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AL4 DOCUMENr 6702 Page One OfTWO pages P JECT: Former Richards Leather CompanyPnjest CONTRACT NO: Salem, MA TO:(OWNER) Dept Of Public Properties CONTRACTOR: Costello Dismantling Co.,Inc. One Salem Green 2 Rocky Gutter Street Salem, MA 01970 Middleboro MA 02345-3509 Our Proj. #: 2KO23 Attn: Peter Strout APPLICATION DATE: 30-Sep-00 APPLICATION NO: 1 PERIOD FROM: Start TO: 30-Sep-00 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Chmuga Orders approved ADDITIONS$ DEDUCTIONS S Application is made for Payment,as shown below,in connection with the Contract in previous months by Continuation sheet,AIA Document G703,is attached. Owner- TOTAL am 0.00 The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: Subsequent Chawngle Orders Number Approved ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM......................................................... 231,000.00 Net Change by Change Orders...................................................... 0.00 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE............................................................. 231,000.00 TOTAL COMPLETED&STORED TO DATE............................... 57,300.00 RETAINAGE ..............................................................................:. 2,$85.00 ad TOTAL EARNED....._........................».._......................................... 54,435.00 TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT..................... 0.00 Net Chance by Change orders: 0.00 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE............................................................. 54,435.00 State of Massachusetts County of:Plymouth The tmdetsigeed Comtacor omfic,that the Work covered by this Application fa Payment . has been oomploted m accordance with the Contract Documents,dus all arceans have been paid by him for Wotk for which previous Ceniflones fa Payment were issued and payments tccivedf mthecwaer,andthntdxc ntpaymemtshownbeteiaisrmwdw. ' / Contra or: COSTELLO DISMANTLING CO.,INC. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 30 day of'� 20 OV .—y Yr e1 B : Daniel T.Costello President 2t Nota Public scion Ex fres: In accordance with the Contact and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. OWNER / G/Qj►� ARCHITECT By: V L��~� 2�/ ( � �d/zGrpo NTRA OR C 3p76G This certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named hamin,payment and acceptance aro without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under the Contract. - Cite of 6alem, A1a!5!5atbu!5ett!5 Public Propertp 33epartment jguilbing Mepartment One 9palem Oreen (978) 745-9595 (Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer February 13, 2001 Marilyn Contreas Department of Housing & Community Development One Congress Street Boston, MA 02114 RE: Demolition of Structure Located at 1-11 Cousins Street in Salem, Massachusetts Dear Ms. Contreas: As Building Commissioner of the City of Salem, I certify that the structure located at 1-11 Cousins Street in Salem, Massachusetts has been demolished in accordance with the scope of services provided to the city. In addition, the building was demolished in accordance with all rules and regulations of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the Salem Building Department at (978) 745-9595, extension 381 if you have any questions or require further information. Sine Peter S r tit Building Commissioner Cite of *alem, jffiaggarbu5ett!5 r Public Propertp Mepartment �sd Wuilbing Bepartment One Salem green (978) 745-9595 (Ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer 8/28/00 Patrick Reffett Planner Salem Planning Board Re: Richard Leather demolition Scope of services 1. The City Of Salem along with Beta Engineering has removed two underground tanks and disposed of the contents and the tanks. 2. The City Of Salem has contracted for an inspection report for asbestos-containing building materials and a removal manual. 3. Costello Dismantling will supervise the asbestos abatement and continue with the final dismantling of the building. 4. After the building is completely raised the contractor will remove all foundations two feet below grade and grade the land with processed concrete from the slab. 5. We will receive all proper documentation from all the contractors and engineers for our records to assure the City of Salem holds no liability. ------------------- INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL PROPERTY FROM 1-11 COUSINS STREET, SALEM WHEREAS, the City of Salem has decided to demolish the property at 1-I I Cousins Street, Salem due to its unsafe condition; and WHEREAS, the City of Salem has almost completed preparation for demolition and expects same to commence next week; and WHEREAS, the owner of the property, One Cousins Street Realty Trust, by and through its agent, property manager Frederic Hutchison, is fully aware of the condition of the premises;and WHEREAS, the property owner has filed suit in Essex Superior Court(Civil Action No. 00-0886-B) for wrongful demolition of said property; and WHEREAS, property owner, through its agent,Frederic Hutchison desires to remove some remaining nonfixture items of value, specifically tacking boards and boiler controls.,S�,,X&C VQkn, NOW, THEREFORE, the parties enter the following agreements as to property owner's removal of said items: 7.13 The City of Salem will allow Frederic Hutchison access to the property on)C:idag, October 26, 2000 between 0.00 a.m. and Ween for the sole purpose of removing said items listed herein. p PROP-" One Cousins Realty Trust shall at all times relieve, indemnify, protect and save harmless the City of Salem, and each of its boards, officers (including but not limited to the Building Inspector and Fire Chief)and employees from any and all claims and liability for death of and injury to persons or property damage that may arise from or be caused by the aforesaid removal procedure. Indemnification shall include any costs of defense and reasonable attorney fees arising from same. Dated this 29th day of October, 2000. City of Salem, dL 04V1,11y T eAd eter Strout, Salem Bldg. Insp. Donna Colitz, Tru e e Cousins Street Realt Trust John . Keenan, City Solicitor es ogal, Counsel for One sins Street R ty Trust it Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community' Development V' C*1 T� iJ Grant Program for the Demolition of 0-1 Abandoned Buildings Fiscal Years 2000-2001 Program Guidelines and Application i Argeo Paul Cellucci, Governor Jane Swift, Lieutenant Governor Jane Wallis Gumble, Director Department of Housing and Community Development, One Congress Street, Boston, YlA 02114 a INTRODUCTION: Chapter 277, section 2B, of the Acts and Resolves of 1995 authorized the establishment of a new grant program to assist communities to meet the costs associated with the demolition and removal of abandoned, unsound structures in communities. The Department of Housing and Community Development is administering this program. The program's primary purpose is to aid cities and towns in demolishing abandoned buildings which pose serious public health and safety threats and require expeditious municipal action. WHO MAY APPLY: Eligible applicants for this program are communities with population density equal to or greater than 1,000 persons per square mile. Also, DHCD will give higher priority to those communities which can also demonstrate that current fiscal constraints impede their ability to undertake demolition and related activities with local revenues. Communities not meeting the population density requirement may request a waiver if the structure(s) proposed for demolition demonstrates a severe health and safety risk. NOTE:Grants are subject to all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The population density requirement may be waived by DHCD for good cause. CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION: Communities shall complete the attached application which requests the following documentation: • the number of fires in 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000 and in 2000 from January 1 to the date of the application, with specific information on the number of fires in previously abandoned buildings, the number of fires in buildings which were abandoned as a result of fire damage, and the number of buildings subject to multiple fires in the same structure. • description of abandoned buildings (fire damaged and other) where demolition is the most appropriate local response to remedy serious health and safety threats. This description shall include: - .area characteristics (residential, commercial, mixed use) - municipal fire statistics in 1996, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 2000 to the date of the application, including arson statistics from the state fire marshal's office, if available, other analysis from the local fire department, or from insurance or mortgage lenders' information - the number of buildings which have been determined to be abandoned - if known, the length of time each building has been abandoned - one or more maps (no latger than 11" X 17); noting the location of each building proposed to be demolished and pictures of each structure to be demolished and its surrounding area. Pictures should indicate areas of damage, dangerous structural condition, etc. t r • Evidence that the buildings proposed for demolition have been determined by at least one of the following methods to be subject to an order of demolition: (1) M.G.L., c. 111, ss. MA and 127B, and State Sanitary Code, 105 CMR 410.831- 410.840 which permit a local board of health to determine that a dwelling is unfit for human habitation and to issue an order of condemnation and require that the building be secured. If the owner does not comply within a year after the board of health causes the dwelling to be closed up, the dwelling may be demolished. If the head of the local health department certifies that immediate demolition is essential, the dwelling may be demolished within 30 days after being closed up. (2) M.G.L., c. 143, ss. 6-9, and State Building Code, 780 CMR Sections 123 and 124, which authorize a local building inspector to determine that a building or other structure is dangerous or abandoned, and order that it be made safe or removed. If the owner fails to begin to comply by noon of the day following service of the order, the city or town may convene a survey board to inspect the building. If the survey board determines that the building is dangerous or abandoned, and the owner still fails to comply with the order, the city or town may demolish the building or structure. (3) In addition to findings based on the Sanitary Code and the Building Code, communities may provide documentation for a decision to demolish a structure based on the criteria listed below. It is not necessary to provide documentation for each criterion listed, but the community must provide sufficient evidence based on these criteria to justify the demolition decision for reasons of public health and safety: (a) evidence of blight specific to the structure and in the surrounding area (may use photos) (b) blighted structure is determined to be contributing to decline of property values in the immediate area (c) evidence of repeated instances of destructive vandalism in and around the structure (d) strong community and/or neighborhood preference for demolition (may be demonstrated by the public hearing record required for this program) (e) evidence that the structure is of public health and safety concern because of vagrancy, intruders, illegal or dangerous activity, or proximity to area used by children and/or elders (e.g., close to school, park, church, neighborhood shopping area, etc.) (f) property is vacant and in substantial tax delinquency for three or more consecutive years (g) evidence that previous diligent, written attempts by the municipality to require the owner/landlord to improve property conditions have been unsuccessful. For (3), please keep in mind the following: (1) DHCD will consider properties determined to require municipal action to demolish through this route of lower priority than a determination based on a Sanitary Code, Building Code, or Board of Survey finding. (2) Properties 2 i proposed for demolition based on these indicators may require a site visit and inspection by DHCD prior to approval for funding. (4) Pursuant to any final order of a court authorizing demolition of a building or other structure by a city or town. NOTE: No residential building containing occupants shall be deemed eligible for demolition under this program unless it has been determined to be subject to an order of demolition by the method prescribed in M.G.L., c. 111, ss. 127A and 127B and the State Sanitary Code. • Description of past municipal efforts to remove abandoned structures, which includes the number of properties demolished in the past two years, and evidence indicating the need for financial assistance at this time. The description SHALL include: 1) relationship of past demolition efforts to any pians or strategies for the renewal or r revitalization of areas where abandoned buildings are located; 2) priority ranking of the buildings proposed to be demolished, with the building ranked first as the community's highest priority for demolition. Indicate the rationale/justification for the priority ranking (see individual property sheet.) • Additional special conditions for historic structures: I. In addition to the evidence described above demonstrating that the municipality has the legal authority to proceed with demolition of each building, the municipality must include, where applicable, any necessary certification by the local Historical Commission and/or Historic District Commission (or Massachusetts Historical Commission) that the building slated for demolition has no historical significance or designation on the Register of Historic Places. If an abandoned building is listed on the State Register of Historic Places, the municipality must submit evidence of approval of the proposed demolition(s) by the Massachusetts Historical Commission. 2. If the municipality has a demolition delay ordinance/bylaw, its effect on the schedule for demolition of each building must be described and the ordinance or bylaw attached to the application. Any deed restriction or other conditions which prohibit or could delay demolition must be described for each building. • Sufficient evidence of community participation regarding the municipality's proposed use of these funds: 1. THE APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY EVIDENCE OF THE MUNICIPALITY'S EFFORTS TO INVOLVE NEIGHBORHOOD/CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND AREA RESIDENTS, AND MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A MUNICIPAL BOARD, COMMISSION, OFFICE, 3 OR AGENCY HELD TO SOLICIT PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE MUNICIPALITY'S APPLICATION PROCESS. Letters or flyers sent to community groups and residents, inclusion of information about the hearing on the agendas of community group meetings, newspaper articles, etc. can be used to document the community's outreach effort. 2. The Board of Aldermen, City Council, or Board of Selectmen must designate an appropriate municipal entity which shall hold a public hearing regarding the proposed application for funding under this program. • Description of possible short-term and long-term reuse options for properties where demolition occurs. Such plans MUST include local commitment to maintain lots for reuse while options are tieing considered (i.e., fencing or other barriers, leveling, loaming and seeding of resultant vacant lots, trash removal, police protection), and an initial plan for reuse. The community SHALL commit to develop a subsequent, long-term reuse plan including participation by community development corporations, neighborhood associations, and other interests reflective of community needs in the area(s) where demolition takes place. LIMITATIONS ON GRANT APPLICATIONS: Municipalities are urged to identify areas of the community where demolition funding can most effectively be applied to preserve decent living conditions for residents in the neighborhood. Demolition of abandoned residential or small commercial structures in otherwise occupied residential neighborhoods is a priority of this program; demolition of industrial and large commercial structures will be considered only on a case-by-case basis, based on sufficient documentation that the abandoned property is a significant health and safety concern affecting occupied residential properties in the immediate vicinity. Abandoned buildings owned by the municipality (other than those taken through the tax title process) are not eligible for this program. It is DHCD 's firm intention to disburse this funding as quickly as possible in order to address the critical public health and safety concerns in municipalities adversely affected by abandonment. There is no minimum grant application threshold. The maximum amount of funding which can be requested in.any one application is $250,000. Additional applications may not be submitted until all activities funded through the grant from the initial application have been completed. NOTE: Communities may request a waiver from the maximum award only in the instance where the community has determined that demolition of a single large structure is the only way to eliminate a severe health and safety risk now affecting the surrounding area. DHCD will consider such requests on a case-by--case basis, and may request that the city or town indicate the possible availability of funds from municipal sources to contribute to the cost of the demolition. 4 ALLOWABLE COSTS: The primary use of these funds will be for the inspection of the property to determine the presence of hazardous waste in the structure/on the site, actual demolition costs, resulting building debris disposal costs, including disposal of hazardous waste in the structure (including underground fuel storage tanks), costs of fencing or other protective barriers, and leveling, loaming and seeding the resultant vacant lot(s); applicants MUST note on the budget included in the application any other costs which may be reasonably associated with this activity, BUT MAY NOT include any costs associated with grant administration, title search, Board of Survey functions, legal fees, and expenses incurred as a result of court actions and/or municipal functions in the areas of firefighting, fire prevention, building inspection, or other ongoing municipal responsibilities. EVALUATION CRITERIA o g system which is described below: t the ratio s All applications will be evaluated according Population density (maximum of 3 points): POINTS • 1,000 to 3,000/square mile 1 • 3,001 to 8,000/square mile 2 • 8,001 and over/square mile 3 Number of abandoned buildings (maximum of 5 points): • 1 to 10 1 • 10 to 25 3 • 50 + 5 Number of fires in 1996, 1997 1998, 1999, and 2000 (cumulative to maximum of 5 points) • in abandoned buildings (maximum of 3 points) 1 to 10 1 10 or more 3 • in buildings which were burned and then abandoned 10 or more 1 • multiple fires per building 1 Discretionary points: Up to 7 discretionary points may be awarded based upon the information provided in the application. Factors which will be considered during the evaluation will include the following: • Documentation of abandoned and fire-damaged buildings is sufficient to provide evidence of severe public health and safety hazards; municipalities should provide evidence of sanitary code violations, building code violations, and/fire incidence reports which describe the extent of damage to the structure, and provide sufficient justification for the municipality's decision to seek funding for demolition of the structure. Evaluation Criteria are continued on page 6. 5 • Municipality's prior efforts and/or ability to move forward within a 94 day time frame to begin demolition is documented. • Evidence of community participation in determining the need for this program in the neighborhoods of the city or town. • Application demonstrates local commitment to an inclusionary planning process to determine reuse of demolished building sites. • Commitment of chief executive that the municipality will provide sufficient protection for abandoned building sites both during and after the demolition is referenced in the application. • Demolitions proposed are likely to promote the revitalization of significantly blighted areas within a municipality. • The community's fiscal condition has been a factor in the municipality's ability to respond to the need for the demolition of abandoned buildings. Evidence of fiscal condition would include factors such as property tax revenue loss in the prior two years; extent of reliance on state aid to balance operating budget, other local revenue loss in the prior two years, or other budget reduction actions (e.g., personnel reductions,reductions in hours of service, fees instituted and increased, etc.). SPECIAL NOTES: A Community Action Statement (CAS) submission is NOT required for participation in this program. Regulations promulgated at 760 CMR 48.00- Grant Program for the Demolition of Abandoned Buildings - have been rescinded. Guidelines now in effect for this program are reflected in this guidelines/application package. If a demolition would involve the displacement of occupants of more than five dwelling or business units, the municipality must submit a relocation plan as required by M.G.L„ c. 79A, s. 4. Funding from this program does not preclude a municipality from seeking to recover any demolition costs and related expenses which it would be entitled to recover under the applicable Massachusetts General Law. DHCD may consult with other stare agencies and departments, including but not limited to, departments of the Executive Office of Public Safety, the Department of Public Health, the Department of Revenue, the Massachusetts Historic Commission, and the Division of Capital Planning and Operations during the evaluation process. 6 DHCD reserves the right to consider applications from any community which can demonstrate that abandoned and fire damaged buildings are a significant health and safety concern in the municipality, and to increase the size of a grant above the amount requested as circumstances may require. Also, DHCD may award less than the funding amount requested in any grant application. CAUTION: DHCD reserves the right not to award funds through this program should the applications received fail to demonstrate that the proposed activities are consistent with the legislative intent of this program. Costs incurred rior to the execution of a grant contract between the grantee and DHCD are not eligible for reimbursement. FUNDING AVAILABILITY.• Grantees shall sign contracts which will set out the payment arrangements for each grant award; DHCD will allow partial advance payments, with the payment schedule to be negotiated in the grant agreement. No grantee will receive a final grant payment until all reporting requirements are met and all work has been completed. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: Grantees must submit progress reports as required in the grant contact by DHCD , and must submit a final report within 45 days of the completion of activities funded under this grant program. 7 APPLICATION Abandoned Buildings Demolition Grant Program This application for funding is submitted by the Municipality of: FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL CONTACT Name and Title: Address: Telephone: ( ) Number of Abandoned Buildings for which Demolition funding is requested: Number of those Buildings which were Damaged by Fire: Amount of State Funding Requested $ Amount of Local Funding to be used $ Source of local funds: Did the municipality receive funds from this program? YES_NO_ Has this proposal been discussed with DHCD prior to its submission? YES NO If yes, with whom? I submit this application on behalf of the municipality identified above and certify that the municipality is unable to proceed with the demolitions proposed in this application without this funding. Chief Elected Official Signature Date Print name and title 8 Information to be used for Eligibility and Ranking of Applications: • Population Density equal or greater than 1,000 persons per square mile (includes 94 municipalities) Population Density of applicant is per square mile according to 1990 US Census • Demonstration of need for funding: On separate page(s), submit information which provides evidence that the municipality's current fiscal condition impedes its ability to fund ongoing demolition efforts. See evaluation criteria on pages 4-6. • Extent of the need due to number of abandoned, unsound and/or fire damaged residential or commercial buildings (in primarily residential areas) Number of abandoned buildings in the community: State separately the number of fires in each building abandoned prior to the fire, during 1996, 1997 1998 1999, d to date in 2000: 1996 1997 _ 1998 _ 1999_ 2000_ How many buildings were involved in these fires? 1996 _ 1997 1998 1999 .2000 How many buildings in the community were abandoned as a result of the fire? 1996 1997 _ 1998_ 1999 _ 2000 (to date) Number of buildings involved in multiple fires? 1996 _ 1997 _ 1998_ 1999_ 2000_ • Past efforts to address problems of abandonment On separate page(s), describe the community's efforts to remove or reuse abandoned buildings in the past two years. Include the number of properties demolished, cost, and source of funding. Include information that shows the community's critical need for funding from this program at this time. Include the relationship of the demolition efforts described to any plans or strategies for the renewal or revitalization of the area where demolition occurred. • Ability of the municipality to proceed immediately: Does your community have a demolition delay ordinance/bylaw in effect? Yes _ No If yes, describe its provisions briefly and attach copy to this application. Does it affect any of the properties included in this application? Yes _ No Number_ Are any of the buildings in a Historic District or listed in the State or National Register of Historic Places? Yes No - 9 If the answer to any of these questions is yes, identify the buildings as appropriate on the Individual Property Sheet. Be sure to document the steps which have been taken to allow the municipality to move forward with demolition expeditiously. • Participation of the public regarding the proposed use of these funds. Provide a listing of the neighborhood/civic/social service organizations notified by the city or town of the date, time, and location of the public hearing, and a copy of the notice sent to such organizations. Include also any newspaper articles and/or description of specific outreach efforts in the municipality's neighborhoods. A public hearing was held to solicit resident response to this application on date by (identify local board, office, commission, or agency). NOTE: The minutes of the hearing must be included as Exhibit 1. • Other Information and documentation required as part of this application One or more maps (no larger than 11" X 17") showing the location of properties to be demolished as Exhibit 2. If more than one map is included, a summary map showing the area of each of the other maps must be provided as a key. Submit an Individual Property Sheet (included in this application) for each structure for which the community is seeking funding from this urogram. Include one or more pictures showing the site, condition of the building, and area surrounding the property to be demolished for each property included. Provide municipal fire statistics for 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 including arson statistics from the state fire marshal's office (if available), or from insurance or mortgage lenders' information. 10 Individual Property Sheet Description of individual property to be demolished. Use one form for each property included in the application. Include additional sheets as needed on each individual property Priority Rank (I indicates most important): — PROPERTY ADDRESS: NUMBER OF UNITS: Structure use prior to abandonment: Residential i Commercial — Other (describe) Neighborhood Description: Residential Commercial Industrial Mixed use Describe Owner Name and Address: List history of building code violations relevant to the decision to recommend demolition of the structure (If available, list dates of findings): Describe actions taken to enforce the building code, if any. i 'AF Describe the process used to determine the fact that demolition is the most appropriate action for this piece of property. Include (a) certification from city solicitor/town counsel which was used to identify a building as subject to an order of demolition under the criteria established for this program and (b) information relating to expected impact of the demolition of the neighborhood/area. Note any neighborhood that influenced the decision that demolition is the most appropriate solution for this property. -, Describe the short- and long-term reuse options for this property. What commitments does the municipality make to maintain the lot while reuse options and plans are being completed? Indicate municipality's legal authority to demolish the building and that there are no restrictions which would prevent timely action. Note the length of time the building has been abandoned and if it is fire-damaged (number of fires) in 1995-96-97. tl r SCOPE OF SERVICES AND BUDGET (Please attach a separate sheet, if necessary.) Describe the tasks to be funded through this grant for each property referenced. Include costs for: • inspection of property to determine the presence of hazardous materials • demolition costs (includes hazardous waste disposal, as applicable) • resulting disposal costs • costs of fencing or other protective barriers, leveling, loaming and seeding of the lot • other related costs (please specify) Indicate source of cost estimates. NOTE: See page 4 for description of costs eligible under this grant. Applicants are also reminded of the requirement on page 1 of this application that all grants are subject to all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 12 ! i V Citp of *alem, Alaggatbugettg Vublic Propertp Department 13uilbing Department One 6alem green (978) 745-9595 Cxt. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development Grant Program for the Demolition Of Abandoned Buildings To whom it may concern; This property has been a problem for the City Of Salem for many years. The fire department has been called for various fires although not large but still dangerous due to the condition of the building. We have been aware of the structural problems and fire safety issues for some time and the building owner was preparing to make the proper repairs and then the business ceased in approximately 1998, at that time the building changed hands and the process was restarted to resolve our issues. The new owners have not addressed our concerns so as a result the Building department stepped in and invoked The Massachusetts building code 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, survey board, survey report. Attached to this letter contain letters from the survey board, our attorney, two structural reports, and a number of letters informing the owners of the nature of the servility of this Problem. At this time we have completed our environmental survey and have obtained all necessary approvals to start the demolition process. Our expenditures for this work amount to approximately $60,000.00. The end dollar figure will be close to $300,000.00 at this time the City Of Salem is very concerned about public safety and is willing to spend this amount of money to preserve the neighborhood and eliminate the chance of a Catastrophe. This grant would definitely ease the financial burden incurred by our city. Citp of *afem, 41aggatbugettg 3publit Propertp Mepartment juilbing Mepartment One *alem Oreen (978)745-9595 ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer If my office can be of further assistance in obtaining additional information that may be needed for this grant please feel free to call. Sincerely Peter Strout Building Commissioner Citp of balem, fHag!6arbuq;ettg 3publir 3propertp department 36uilbing ;Department One balem Oreen (978) 745-9595 (ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. George Mathews Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance 1 Ashburton Place Room 1505 Boston, Ma. 02108 Dear Mr. Mathew's: As per our conversation today relative to the "Richard Leather Building" at I-11 Cousins St. in Salem. After numerous complaints from neighbors concerned about the condition of the above mentioned building and a structural report that states the need for extensive Structural repairs, the City Of Salem and the building department conducted a board of survey in accordance with the Mass. Building code and found the building to be in serious condition. At that time I invoked 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As the code reads the owner has the ability to make the building safe or remove the structure, this did not happen. At this point the City Of Salem has the right to retain a demolition firm and remove the building. Enclosed you will find some of the pertinent correspondence we have had with the owners. This is a serious condition and needs to be dealt with immediately. Sincerel 15--e%—ter Strout Building Commissioner I.^ sy [ (.Citp of 6alem, �Haaarbuoettz - 10 publit propertp Department 3uilbing Department One&Aiem often (918)7459595&1.380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. George Mathews Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance I Ashburton Place Room 1505 Boston, Ma. 02108 Dear Mr. Mathew's: As per our conversation today relative to the"Richard Leather Building" at 1-11 Cousins St. in Salem. After numerous complaints from neighbors concerned about the condition of the above mentioned building and a structural report that states the need for extensive Structural repairs, the City Of Salem and the building department conducted a board of survey in accordance with the Mass. Building code and found the building to be in serious condition. At that time I invoked 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As the code reads the owner has the ability to make the building safe or remove the structure, this.did not happen. At this point the City Of Salem has the right to retain a demolition firm and remove the building. Enclosed you will find some of the pertinent correspondence we have had with the owners. This is a serious condition and needs to be dealt with immediately. ;S*ince,ellrout, Emergency Waiver of advertising requirements under MGL c.149 sec.44J (6) is hereby granted on Building Commissioner this 141- day of George M. Matthews, Associate General Counsel Emergency Waiver No._ j 1, 07/20/00 TIU 14:24 FAX 9787400072 .JOHN D HEENAN [a 001/001 RECEIVEC 2: Z3 i CITY OF SALEM - MASSACHUSETPSL_,:;;, JOHN WILLIAM J.LUNDREQAN Legal Department +. �,, iNG!' _ smm D.KEENAN city$o§ator e9 p �`'�-r,\: tit. <<�; 'Asslslant ng n Sir"r 81 w"tington Street 93 Washington Street a0 Washington Street ..' Tel:978.741-3188 slam, Massachusetts 07970 Tel;979.741-AM Fw 978-741-0110 Fac;978.740-0072 VIA FAX &FIRST CLASS MAIL: 978.745.66% July 20, 2000 James L. Rogal, Esq. 32 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Demolition of Richard's Leather Company 1-11 Cousins Street, Salem, MA Dear Attorney Rogal: Due to the owner's failure to employ sufficient labor speedily to remove the above captioned premises, the Building Inspector will now hire an independent demolition company to proceed immediately. (780 CMR 121). As you recall, it was the owner who plead with the Building Inspector to allow him to do this job himself so he could save on the demolition costs, Yet in approximately the month he has been authorized to demolish, he has made no progress. Considering the condition of the building and public safety emergency, such nonperformance is unacceptable. Please remind your client that the total costs to demolish this building will become a municipal lien on the property. Very best ilegards. — W� ,\L'1� John"- Keenan, Asst ity Solicitor Enc_ cc. eter Strout, Bldg. Inspector Aobert Turner. Fire Chief Scott LaCava, Ward One Councilor CITY OF SALEM - MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM J.LUNDREGAN Legal Department JOHN D.KEENAN City Solicitor 93 Washington Street Assistant City Solicitor 60 81 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Washington street Tel:978.741.3888 Tel:978-741-44M Fax:978.741-8110 Fax:978.740-0072 VIA FAX& FIRST CLASS MAIL: 978.745.6606 June 23, 2000 James L. Rogal, Esq. 32 Church Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: Demolition of Richard's Leather Company 1-11 Cousins Street, Salem, MA Dear Attorney Rogal: As you are aware, the above captioned property has been declared an unsafe and dangerous structure pursuant to 780 CMR 121.0. The condition of said property warrants immediate demolition, as was confirmed by Judge Howard Whitehead. Through you and your client's discussions with Building Inspector Peter Strout, it is my understanding that the owner is now willing to demolish the building as requested by the Building Inspector. Pursuant to 780 CMR 121, the owner must"employ sufficient labor speedily to . . . remove [the building]." This process should proceed forthwith in accordance with 780 CMR 121 (unsafe structures) and 780 CMR 112.0 (demolition of structures). It is further understood that the demolition will be completed on or before August 11, 2000. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions. Very best regards, Joqt Keenan, As City Solicitor En cc. Peter Strout, Bldg. Inspector Robert Turner, Fire Chief 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION provisions of 780 CMR in case of any false the necessary retaining walls and fences in statement or misrepresentation of fact in the accordance with the provisions of 780 CMR 33. application or on the plans on which the permit or approval was based. 780 CMR 113.0 CONDITIONS OF PERMIT 113.1 Payment of fees:A permit shall not be issued 111.13 Approval in part:The building official may until the fees prescribed in 780 CMR 114.0 have issue a permit for the construction of foundations or been paid. any other part of a building or structure before the construction documents for the whole building or 113.2 Compliance with code:The permit shall be a structure have been submitted, provided that license to proceed with the work and shall not be adequate information and detailed statements have construed as authority to violate,cancel or set aside been filed complying with all of the pertinent any of the provisions of 780 CMR or any other law requirements of 780 CMR: Work shall be limited to or regulation, except as specifically stipulated by that work approved by the partial approval and modification or legally granted variation as further work shall proceed only when the building described in the application. permit is amended in accordance with 780 CMR 110.13. The holder of such permit for the 113.3 Compliance with permit: All work shall foundation or other parts of a building or structure conform to the approved application and the shall proceed at the holder's own risk with the approved construction documents for which the building operation and without assurance that a permit has been issued and any approved permit for the entire building or structure will be amendments to the approved application or the granted. approved construction documents. 111.14 Posting of permit: A true copy of the 113.4 Compliance with site plan: All new work building permit shall be kept on the site of shall be located strictly in accordance with the operations, open to public inspection during the approved site plan. entire time of prosecution of the work and until the completion of the same. 780 CMR 114.0 FEES 111.15 Notice of start: At least 24-hour notice of 114.1 General: A permit to begin work for new start of work under a building permit shall be given construction,alteration,removal,demolition or other to the building official. building operation shall not be issued until the fees prescribed in 780 CMR 114.0 shall have been paid 780 CMR 1120 DEMOLITION OF to the department of building inspection or other STRUCTURES authorized agency of the jurisdiction, nor shall an amendment to a permit necessitating an additional 112.1 Service connections: Before a building or fee be approved until the additional fee has been structure is demolished or removed, the owner or paid agent shall notify all utilities having service connections within the structure such as water, 114.2 Special fees:The payment of the fee for the electric,gas,sewer and other connections. A permit construction, alteration, removal or demolition for to demolish or remove a building or structure shall all work done in connection with or concurrently not be issued until a release is obtained from the with the work contemplated by a building permit utilities, stating that their respective service shall not relieve the applicant or holder of the permit connections and appurtenant equipment, such as from the payment of other fees that are prescribed by meters and regulators,have been removed or sealed law or ordinance for water taps, sewer connections, and plugged in a safe manner. electrical permits, erection of signs and display AO debris shall be disposed of in accordance with structures, marquees or other appurtenant 780 CMR 111.5. structures, or fees of inspections, certificates of 112.2 Notice to adjoining owners: Only when occupancy or other privileges or requirements,both written notice has been given by the applicant to the within and without the jurisdiction of the department owners of adjoining lots and to the owners of wired of building inspection. or other facilities,of which the temporary removal is necessitated by the proposed work,shall a pernit be 114.3 New construction and alterations:The fees granted for the removal of a building or structure. for plan examination, building permit and inspections shall be as prescribed in 780 CMR 112.3 Lot regulation: Whenever a building or 114.3.1 and the building official is authorized to structure is demolished or removed, the premises establish by approved rules a schedule of unit rates shall be maintained free from all unsafe or hazardous for huddings and structures of all use groups and conditions by the proper regulation of the lot, types of construction as classified and defined in restoration of established grades and the erection of 780 CMR 1, 3 and 6. 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR- Sixth Edition 23 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE 114.3.1 Fee schedule: A fee for each plan variations of the approved construction documents examination, building permit and inspection shall and permit shall be noted and the holder of the be paid in accordance with the fee schedule as permit shall be notified of the discrepancies. established by the municipality. 115.6 General: In the discharge of his duties, the 114.4 Accounting: The building official shall keep building official shall have the authority to enter at an accurate account of all fees collected; and such any reasonable hour any building, structure or collected fees shall be deposited in the jurisdiction premises in the municipality to enforce the treasury in accordance with procedures established provisions of 780 CMR. by the municipality, or otherwise disposed of as If any owner, occupant, or other person refuses, required by law. impedes, inhibits, interferes with, restricts, or obstructs entry and free access to every part of the 780 CMR 115.0INSPECTION structure, operation or premises where inspection authorized by 780 CMR is sought, the building 115.1 Preliminary inspection: Before issuing a official, or state inspector may seek, in a court of permit, the building official shall, if deemed competent jurisdiction, a search warrant so as to necessary, examine or cause to be examined all apprise the owner, occupant or other person buildings, structures and sites for which an concerning the nature of the inspection and application has been filed for a permit to construct, justification for it and may seek the assistance of enlarge, alter, repair, remove, demolish or change police authorities in presenting said warrant. the use or occupancy thereof. 115.7 Identification: The building official shall 115.2 Required inspections: After issuing a cant' proper identification when inspecting building permit, the building official shall conduct structures or premises in the performance of duties inspections during construction at intervals sufficient under 780 CMR. -to ensure compliance with the provisions of - 780 CMR. The building official shall inform the 115.8 Jurisdictional cooperation: The assistance applicant of the required points of inspection at the and cooperation of police, fire, and health time of application. Upon completion of the work departments and all other officials shall be available for which a permit has been issued, the building to the building official as required in the official shall conduct a final inspection pursuant to performance of his duties. 780 CMR 115.5. A record of all such examinations and inspections and of all violations of 780 CMR 115.9 Coordination of inspections: Whenever in shall be maintained by the building official. For the enforcement of 780 CMR or another code or buildings and structures subject to construction ordinance, the responsibility of more than one control, the owner shall provide for special building official of the jurisdiction is involved, it inspections in accordance with 780 CMR 1705.0. shall be the duty of the building officials involved to In conjunction with specific construction projects, coordinate their inspections and administrative the building official may designate specific orders as fully as practicable so that the owners and inspection points in the course of construction that occupants of the building or structure shall not be require the contractor or builder to give the building subjected to visits by numerous inspectors or official 24 hours notice prior to the time when those multiple or conflicting orders. Whenever an inspections need to be performed. The building inspector from any agency or department observes official shall make the inspections within 48 hours an apparent or actual violation of some provision of after notification. some law, ordinance or code not within the inspector's authority to enforce, the inspector shall 115.3 Approved inspection agencies:The building report the findings to the building official having official may accept reports of approved inspection jurisdiction. agencies provided such agencies satisfy the requirements as to qualifications and reliability. 780 CMR 116.0 REGISTERED ARCHnECTURAL AND 115.4 Plant inspection: Where required by the PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING provisions of 780 CMR or by the approved rules, SERVICES-CONSTRUCTION CONTROL materials or assemblies shall be inspected at the point of manufacture or fabrication in accordance 116.1 General: The provisions of 780 CMR 116.0 with 780 CMR 1703.3. define the construction controls required for all buildings and structures needing registered 115.5 Final inspection: Upon completion of the architectural or registered professional engineering building or structure, and before issuance of the services, and delineate the responsibilities of such certificate of occupancy required by 780 CMR professional services together with those services 120.0, a final inspection shall be made. All that are the responsibility of the contractor during construction. 24 780 CMR-.Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER M. WELCH THIRTY-TWO CHURCH STREET SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE(978)745-0500 FACSIMILE(978)745-6606 NEW BURYPORT OFFICE CHRISTOPHER M.WELCH 24 CENTER STREET NEWBURYPORT,MASSACHUSETTS 01950 JOSEPH WELCH TELEPHONE(978)465-5022 JAMES L..ROGAL - FACSIMILE(978)465-3506 Of C..K I E.DOUGLAS BOLICK May 30, 2000 BY CERTFIED MAIL—RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Peter Strout—Inspector of Buildings City of Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Former Richard Leather Co., 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Mr. Strout: I represent One Cousins Street Realty Trust("Trust"), the owner of the former Richard's Leather Co., at 1-11 Cousins Street. On behalf of the Trust, I would again request that Fred Hutchinson be allowed to demolish the building. He has the expertise and resources to do the work professionally and safely. The Trust also requests that if the City does perform the demolition that the brick office building remain standing. It is structurally sound and separate from the wood structure that has been deemed unsafe. Finally, the Trust requests that it provide security for the area, instead of the City watching the area. The Trust is fully insured and will provide proof on request. I look forward to hearing from you. cerely, e 7ogal JLR/wp c: One Cousins Street Realty Trust Citp of *afem, ag!9atbUg;ett!6 Publit Propertp Mepartment 39uilbing Mepartment One apatem oreen (978) 745.9595 Cxt. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer 5/22/99 1-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz RE: i-I l Cousins St. Dear Ms. Colitz: 4n May 15 2000 The City of Salem entered the property at 1-11 Cousins St. with the owners permission and conducted a"Survey Board"inspection according to 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As a result the board found the building to be extremely dangerous and in need of immediate repair or the removal of the structure. The City Building Department has been trying to work with the owners past and present to provide us with a suitable plan to proceed with making the building safe and have had no response. This process has been going on for several years with the building further failing. At this point we are forced to invoke 121.4 and start the process immediately. Sincerel i Peter Strout Building Commissioner 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE If it appears that such building or structure would be case of such demolition, the said building official especially unsafe in rase of fire, it shall be deemed shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with dangerous within the meaning hereof; and the adjacent grades by a inorganic 511. The costs and building official may affix in a conspicuous place charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the land upon its exterior walls a notice of its dangerous upon which the structure is located, and shall be condition, which shall not be removed or defaced enforced in an action of contract; and such owner without authority from him. shall,for every dal s continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so notified,be punished by a fine 121.3 Removal or making structure safe: Any in accordance with 780 CMR 118.4. The provisions person so notified shall be allowed until 12:00 noon of M.G.L.c. 139, §3A,paragraph two,relative to of the day following the service of the notice in liens for such debt and the collection of claims for which to begin to remove such building or structure such debt shall apply to arty debt referred to in this or make it safe, or to make it secure, and he shall section, except that the said building official shall employ sufficient labor speedily to make it safe or act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of remove it or to make it secure; but if the public selectmen. During the time such order is in effect, safety so requires.and if the mayor or selectmen so it shall be unlawful to use or occupy such structure order, the building official may immediately enter or any portion thereof for any purpose. upon.the premises with the necessary workmen and assistants and cause such unsafe structure to be made 121.6 Remedy of person ordered to remove a safe or demolished without delay and a proper fence dangerous structure or make it .safe: put up for the protection of passersby,or to be made Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 122,an secure. owner, aggrieved by such order may have the remedy prescribed by M.G.L.c. 139,§2:provided 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, that any provision of M.G.L.c. 139,§2 shall not be survey board,survey report: If an owner of such construed so as to hinder, delay or prevent the unsafe structure refuses or neglects to comply.with building official from acting and proceeding under the requirements of such notice within the specified 780 CMR 121; and provided, further; that this time limit, and such structure is not made safe or section shall not prevent the city or town from taken down as ordered therein, a careful survey of recovering the forfeiture provided in said 780 CMR the premises shall be made by a board consisting;in 121.5 from the date of the service of the original a city, of a city engineer, the head of the fire notice,unless the order is annulled by the jury. department, as such term is defined in M.G.L. c. 148, § 1, and one disinterested person to be 780 CMR 1210 BOARD OF APPFAIR appointed by the building official;and,in a town of 122.1 State Building Code Appeals Board: a surveyor,the head of the fire department and one Except for actions taken pursuant to 780 CMR disinterested person to be appointed by the building 121.0, whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, official. In the absence of any of the above officers order,requirement,direction or fitilure to act under or individuals, the mayor or selectmen shall 780 CMR by any agency or official of the city,town designate one or more officers or other suitable or region,or agency or official of the State charged persons in place of the officers so named as with the administration or enforcement of 780 CMR members of said board. A written report of such or any of its rides or regulations, excepting any survey shall be made, and a copy thereof seryed on specialized codes, may appeal directly to the State such owner. Building Code Appeals Board as provided in 780 CMR 122.0. 121.5 Removal of dangerous or abandoned - Whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation,order, structures: If such survey report as outlined in requirement, direction or failure to act under 780 CMR 121.4 declares such structure to be 780 CMR by any agency or official of a city, town dangerous or to be unused, uninhabited or or region charged with the administration or abandoned, and open to the weather, and if the enforcement of 780 CMR,excepting any specialized owner continues such refusal or neglect,the building codes, may appeal directly to the State Building official shall cause it to be made safe or taken down Code Appeals Board or may appeal first to,a local or or to be made secure; and, if the public safety so regional building code appeals board and if requires,said building official may at once enter the aggrieved thereby he may then appeal to the State structure,the land on which it stands or the abutting Building Code Appeals Board as provided in land or buildings, with such assistance as he may 780 CMR 122.0. require, and secure the same; and may remove and In the event an appeal is taken directly to the State evict, under the pertinent provisions of M.G.L. Building Code Appeals Board from an c.239,or otherwise, any tenant or occupant thereof; interpretation, order, requirement or direction,said and may erect such protection for the public by appeal shall be filed as specified in 780 CMR proper fence or otherwise as may be necessary,and 122,3.1 with the State Building Code Appeals Board for this purpose may close a public highway. In the not later than 45 days after the service of notice 28 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION Consultants in the Engineering Sciences 34 Rockland Street,Swampscott,MA 01407 781.581.2454 12 May 2000 City of Salem Public Property Department Building Department Re: Existing Conditions, 1-11 Cousins St., Former `Richard Leather Co.,Inc. Building' Salem,MA Attention:Peter Strout,Building Commissioner Gentlemen: As you requested,today we made a visual survey of certain conditions at the building. We were accompanied by Commissioner Strout while others were present. The building walls are out-of-phunb with a visually-alarming lean toward Cousins St. Many of the interior timber columns show this same lean with associated distress to the timber beams they support. Much of the structure's interior framing is severely deteriorated, structurally I nappropriate and unstable, or both. We consider the existing structure to be dangerously unstable and unsafe. High winds, ponding rain water or snow on the roofs, or a jar from heavy vehicular traffic could trigger a collapse. We consider that the structure is a hazard which could result in injury or death.Not only the public as a whole,but especially the residences on the opposite side of Cousins St. are at risk. Very truly, HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION William Loring Hobbs President o. Frank D. DeFalco r Principal i . Citp of 6alem, f laggacbulzetw Department of Public gperbice8 One 6alem Oreen (978) 745-9595 Cxt. 321 STANLEY 1.BORNSTEIN,P.E. City Engineer _fax: (978) 745-5877 Director of Public Services May 17, 2000 Peter Strout, Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Board of Survey, former Richards Leather,Webb St. Dear Peter: As you know, on May 12, 2000 I, along with yourself, Chief Turner, Inspector LaTulippe, and William Hobbs visited and inspected the above mentioned site. The purpose of our inspection was to determine the level of hazard that exists at the site and to determine whether or not the building could be salvaged. As a result of our inspection, I can say firmly that the level of hazard is extreme and that it is not possible to salvage the existing structure. During my inspection, I noted the almost total lack of lateral bracing in the structure. This feature makes the building inherently unstable, as noticed by the fact that the building is listing towards Cousins Street several inches. I also noticed that at some point,the roof trusses had their bottom chords removed and replaced with vertical posts. This will result in transferring the roof load from the outside walls to the columns below. On their best day,the columns below were not designed for that load. The columns that I saw were rotted severely and damaged by impact. Several floor joists were barely attached to their respective columns. Most connections were nailed and not bolted. I notice quite a bit of damage that appeared to be new. I saw several main carrying beams that were showing signs of recent failure. The added weight of the ice from this winter when the sprinkler system failed could be to blame. The flat roof on the Cousins Street side is supported on its upper end by a single 2x4 ledger board. This ledger has pulled away from the wall as much as a foot in places. The weight of a fire fighter would surely bring this roof down. I am worried that when this roof collapses (which I believe •r i is imminent)that it will displace the columns that support the main building. This would lead to instant structure failure. in short I believe that the structure is so dangerous and so close to failure as to pose an immediate threat to public safety. It is my opinion that the building should be razed immediately. I have not mentioned the obvious hazard of the electrical service and environmental hazard that exist. I would like to take this time to emplore the fire department to not enter the building, as it would surely lead to a tragedy. If I can be of further assistance,please let me know. SiAnme ( , Assistant City Engineer FJ Cita of Sa(em, Massachusetts FIre Departmmt 4s Lafayette street gLobertW..Turw Sakur,Mass"fmmus01970}3695 Tur21AW"dion T9 978-744-IZ 5 21ureaa 978744.6990 `fad 978-745-4646 978.7457777 May 15,2000 Mr.Peter Strout, Inspector of Buildings City of Salem One Salem Green Salem,MA 01970 Dear Mr.Strout: On Friday,May 12, 2000 I,together with Fire Marshal Charles Latulippe„participated in a Board of Survey with the Inspector of Buildings, the Assistant City Engineer and an independent structural engineer. The property being surveyed was located at #9 Webb Street and is a forn=leathCr processing factory. Upon inspection of the property several structural deficiencies wane noted to imlude altered trusses (bottom chord cut and removed), decayed and/or damaged structural members including weight bearing columns,floor joists,wird bracing, stair stringers and support beams. There were several open, unprotected pits on the ground level which would present severe hazards to firefighters who may enter the building in search of vagrants, the homeless or intruders. Boles had been cut on the floors above to facilitate the removal of machinery. These holes also present an unguarded hazard to rescue personnel and serve to facilitate the rapid spread of fire throughout the building. A quick look at the building from the outside reveals a structure in the process of premature collapse. Exterior walls are so far out of plumb the untrained eye could easily see the propensity ofthese walls for early collapse. This vacant factory is situated in a residential neighborhood in close proximity to several occupied dwellings of unprotected wood-flame construction. Should a fire occur in this dilapidated factory the cmirc neighborhood would be at significant rink of rapid fire spread and immediate danger to the occupants. There is a real poasibilky of a conflagration should the right conditions occur. 1 strongly recommend that this hazard be eliminated immediately in light of the condition of the building and the character of the immediate neighborhood. Sincerely, Robert W. Turner, Chief of Department I i I �w.• ;•y Cite of 6alem, f tag5acbuatt5 e Vublic Propertp Department �Q iguilbing Department One balem Oreen (978)745.9595(ext. 360 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Copy January 25,2000- I-11 Cousins St. Realty Trust Donna Colitz c/o BolIick and Welch 32 Church Street Salem,Ma. 01970 RE: 1-11 Cousins Street Dear Ms. Colitz: Due to numerous complaints and in response to neighborhood concern,I inspected the exterior of your property located at I-I I Cousins Street. I have also been inside the building on several occasions. This department is concerned about continued deterioration of this property. As you are a probably aware, a structural report, conducted by Robert Rumpf and Associates dated January 1998,points out several structural problems. This report also summarizes; "The present condition of the building is so poor as to not warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs." The building is now two years older and still suffering from additional deterioration and the rotting problems caused by these leaks. Section 121 of the State Building Code, 780 CMR, allows a building official to declare a building unsafe structure if it is open to the weather, abandoned or if such structure would be especially unsafe in case of fire. This department and City of Salem Fire Department feel this building would be especially unsafe in case of fire. v�, w J Therefore you are directed to begin the process to make safe or remove the structure. Please contact this office within ten(10)days upon receipt of this letter to discuss your plans for this building. Failure to respond will result in court action being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order you may appeal to the State Building Code Board of Appeals. Forms available at our office. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, C"" Thomas St. Pierre Local Building Inspector cc:Mayor Usovicz Fire Prevention Councillor LaCava Polish Falcons Club of America I i i i i a TitV Of 1-tMI . MUSSUE4US S Public PropertV Bepartment Guilbing 19epartment tgnt 6altm t6rttn 500.745.9595 fid. 300 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer July 9, 1997 Richard Leather Co. Inc. 9 Webb Street Salem, Mass . 01970 Attention: Leo Zisis RE: 9 Webb Street Dear Mr . Zisis : On July 8 , 1997 , per the request of the City of Salem Health Department and some of your abutters, an inspection was conducted at 9 Webb St. on the existing condition of your factory. Per our conversation, you agreed to hire a structural engineer and perform any necessary structural repairs that he found would be required. He is also to file a report to my office in writing of his findings, and means of correction . This office intends on working closely with you to bring this building into State Building Code compliance . Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc: David Shea Health Department Fire Department Councillor Paskowski , Ward 1 TirtU of 0�ttlrut, Massar4uset#s Public Prupertg 1hpartment Vuilbing %pbrtment (9nt #idem Qkren 508-745-9595 Ea. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer October 28, 1997 Richard Leather Co. Inc. 9 Webb Street Salem, Mass. 01970 ATT: Leo Zisis RE: 9 Webb Street Dear Mr. Zisis: This office has been more than patient in waiting for a response from your structural engineer as to what precautions are being made to make the structure safe to enable continuing work to be performed in this building located at 9 Webb Street . This office considers this building unsafe for occupancy under the present condition. Please notify this department within fifteen ( 15 ) days upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violations . Failure to do will result tin legal action being taken. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincer y, Leo E. Trembl Inspector of Buildings LET: scm cc : David Shea Health Department Fire Department Councillor Paskowski, Ward 1 kREA CODE 978 rzL. 745-5440 P.O. BOX 868 rEL. 744-%" RICHAR.D TANNING CO. , INC, FAX .7".4624 MANUFACTURERS OF ANTELO VELOUR GARMENT SUEDE 9 WEBB ST. — SALEM, MA 01970 Jan. 28 , 1998 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building RE; 9 Webb Street Dear Mr. Tremblay, We are requesting a building permit to address certain temporary repairs recommended by Robert M. Rumpf and Associates to enable continuing work to be performed at this location, until the end of June 1998. It will be our intentioli at that time to determine if it will be economically viable to do permanent rep to the building, on ,u� Lt.L-V ao, a Thank you for your continuing support in thi atter. Since ely, Leo Zi s ROBERT M. RUMPF & ASSOCIATES RE: REPORT ,6 ,JA OF At #8002 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Structural Inspection 's ROBERT 101 DERBY STREET Richard Tanning Co. R M. SALEM.MASS.01970 Salem, Massachusetts. s No. 5632 a 508-745-5595 FAX 505-745-5596 16P�'?WW ��SIONALENG` 01/07/98 Mr. Leo Tremblay Building inspector One Salem Breen Salem, Massachusetts 07970 -by hand- REPORT re: . Structural inspection 9 Webb Street Leather Company Facility Salem Massachusetts This is a report on our inspection of the referenced building with full emphasis on occupants' safety. We believe that the present condition of the building is so poor as not to warrant any financially viable attempt at permanent repairs. The remedial directives shown on the enclosed plans are strictly of a temporary nature to insure safety. They are only effective if no additional loading is introduced beyond those required for current operations. Boiler room roof framing requires reinforcing. This engineer shall specify corrective work in the area while shoring operations are underway. We will be making periodic inspections to see that the drawing requirements are met, and keep you informed of same. If you need additional information, please advise, l;Spectfully s4% 1 0. 6632 � yam. a � Robert M. Rumpf, fo1STsa� wW Robert M. Rumpf& L C+ cc: Mr. Leo Z Isis-Trustee 9 Webb Street Salem; Massachusetts 01970 -- l DEMO GRANT TASK/INFO CHECKLIST Plug Dept- Cover letter Bldg Dept- Method of determination , Finance - "Demonstration of need" funding letter t Bldg Dept-Property abandoned due to fire? Bldg Dept-Describe City's effort to address problems of abandonment over.i f lasetwo.yearn j Ping Dept- Ability to proceed info (Demo delay, demo permit) Plug Dept-Participation of public re use of funds (list of organizations notified of public hearing; hold public hearing; create minutes) Plug Dept-Prepare map !Joint Depts-Complete Property sheet ( 1.Building Code violations relevant to decision to recommend demolitionBuilding2 Actions to enforce/Building. 3 Reasons for demolitionBuilding.4.Solicitor certification.5 Area impact of project.6 Re use options 7. City commitment to maintain property. Plug or Bldg_Dept-Photos of property i Fire Dept- Provide municipal fire statistics for last two years (include arson statistics from state fire marshals office or from insurance or mortgage lender N STREET Q O S -TO 05 ` Store and apartment building G7 J � 6 l� L NoL 6 F Gallon Na 6 Erol Oil 80RE(Typicat) U/G Tank Dw n Qom Hui In r 94 r ,3 _ i Se (2) 275 Gal. Na.2 Fuel 01 A/G Tanks Residence Property Lyre 79 (Ty�) 10, Gal. 6 �T k bando a Residence Auto body shop i (JQQ 6Solvent Tank G ./Af Bldg (3) 275 Gallon A/G Tanks - / `` t GOOpNIj E STREET AREA TO BE REMOVED Property at: 80 80STON STREET SALEM, MA SITE E PLAN Scale: l"=40' JUN-06-00 12 :41 PM __..__- P. 01 NORTHEAST 25 Kenore Avenue, Haverhill, Massachusetts 01870 REMEDIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. Tel: (978)372.5814 Fax: (578)372-6754 Juttc 6. 2000 I Mr. Mike Graizer ill meta Engineering 6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln, RI 02865 i I Re: Richards Leather Company,Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr.Graizer: Subject: Asbestos Abatement and Demolition On behalf of Northeast Remedial Management Services. Inc, (Northeast). we are pleased to provide our cost proposal for the above referenced project. Asbestos Abatement: S 85,000.00 Demolition: $211,400.00 Prices include: + Required Federal, State and Local Permitting • Asbestos Abatement and Demolition Plan • Safety (public and workers) • Demolition of: o Chimney to grade level o Threc-story wooden building(former processing site) o Slab oo grade o Foundations removed two feet below grade which inchrdcs chimney demolition foundation • Legal disposal of asbestos and demolition debris • All steel components including lead based painted steel arc to be recycled as scrap metal • Continuous wetting during any and all operations when applicable Hxclusions • PC13's • Contaminated soil Lead paint Oils • Utility pipe relocation or discontinuance • Fencing of barricades • Saw•catting and core drilling • ENeavation and backfill • Electrical pole relocation by otters • Police and Fire Department details UN- - 9 12 -41 PM P. 02 Mr. Mike Graizer Pape 2 June 6, 2000 Beta Engineering • Fecs for demolition permits • Locating underground utilities Thank you very much for the opportunity to provide this cost proposal,and if you have any question; or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call at your earliest convenience. sincerely, ,lrariheast Kemetfi ri Management Services, lnc. William Boss Vice president W Wds 0b/0b/2000 14:57 15089473093 - CASTELLO DISMANTLING PAGE 02 x June 6,2000 ATTN: Mr. Mike Geisser P:401-333-2382 Beta Engineering F:401-333-9225 6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln,Rl. 02865 FROM: Bill Callanan P:508-946-0880 Costello Dismantling Co,Inc. F: 508-947-3093 2 Rocky Gutter St. Middleboro,Ma. 02346 Project: SITE OF THE FORMER RICHARDS LEATHER Salem, Mo. PROPOSAL Costello Dismantling Company Inc. is pleased to provide a quotation for the Demolition services required for the above project in Salem,Ma, We will supply all labor, materials,equipment and insurance to fully and finally complete the work as specified in the demolition specification section with the conditions as noted in this proposal. We are fully insured for S 10,000,000.00 of General Liability coverage. Our concern for safety extends to every aspect of our company as we rely heavily on our excavators which are equipped with a variety of attachments. All of our labor force have been certified with 40 hour OSHA training and OSHA Competent Person training 29 CFR t926.All salvage shall be credited to Costello Dismantling Co., Inc We have visited the site and are aware of the current access conditions. Our scope of work will include the following: I. Prepare Demolition flan and Schedule 2. Assist with all state and local permits required for start up. 3. Ensure safe passage of people around demolition area. 4. Remove all ACM from the entire building. 5. Remove the brick chimney down to grade,foundations 2 feet below grade. 6. Selectively dismantle a three story wood building formally used as a leather processing building. l 7. Completely remove the concrete slab on grade. 8. Remove foundation walls down to 2 feet below grade. 9. All concrete will be crushed on site and will be graded on site. 10. Remove and legally dispose of all demolition debris at an off site location 11. Any steel components coated with lead-based paint are exempt from the general hazardous waste recycling rules when they are handled as salvage scrap metal eventually recycled to a smelter. 14: b7 9473093 COSTELLO DISMANTLING PAGE 01 'r COSTELLO DISMANTLING PROPOSAL Richards Leather Building PAGEZ 12, Sufficiently wet construction materials during our operations to reduce dust, if required. This Proposal DOES NOT INCLUDE: a) Any handling or disposal of any hazardous materials( lead paint, Oils, PCBs, contaminated soils, etc.) . b) Any utility pipe removal, relocation,or capping. c) Any excavation,backfill, compaction, earthwork, loaming, or seeding. d) Any new paving, grading,or site improvements other than using the crushed concrete. e) Any new fencing or barricades. f) Any concrete sawcutting or core drilling. g) Any local fire or police department details. h) Any new construction. i) Any electrical pole removal or relocation. Beta Engineering or Owner shall: 1. Provide continuous access to the jobsite for equipment access, container loading, and emergency egress_ 2. Pay for all demolition permits and all other local approvals for start-up. 3. Disconnect,relocate and cap utilities. 4. Identify and locate on available plans and in the field,any underground piping which may remain_ 6. Locate and maintain active hydrant for dust control and fire suppression. Detailed. Cost Proposal BUILDING DEMOLITION............5164,000.00 (ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS) ASBESTOS ABATEMENT.............S 851000.00 (EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND) A Reference # 1-1240 CITY OF SALEM Purchasing Department 1. THIS AGREEMENT made and concluded this Eighth day of September the year One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine by and between Regional Industrial Services, 79 Hixon Street, Bellingham, MA 02019; hereinafter referred to as the Vendor and the City of Salem, a municipal corporation established under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, acting by and through its Mayor, Stanley J. Usovicz, Jr.; its Purchasing Agent, Albert C. Hill, Jr.; and it's Director of Public Property, Peter R. Strout; thereto duly authorized, hereinafter referred to as the City. 2. WITNESSETH, that the said Vendor has agreed and by these presents does agree, for the consideration hereinafter contained to Demolish the Flynntan Building(formerly a Leather Tanning Company) per Bid B-17 Conditions, Requirements and Specifications. In case of any alteration of this contract, so much thereof as is not necessarily affected by the change, shall remain in force upon all parties hereto; and no payment for Demolition of the Flynntan Building furnished under such alteration shall be made until the completion of the whole contract, and the adjustment and payment of the bill when rendered for same shall release and discharge the said City from any and all claims or liability on account of any Demolition of the Flynntan Building furnished under this contract, or any alteration thereof. 3. Demolition shall be completed on or before December 16, 1999. 4. The Vendor shall not assign or transfer this contract, or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the Purchasing Agent of said City. 5. And the said Vendor further agrees to indemnify and save harmless the said City of Salem, its officers and agents from all claims and actions of every name and description brought against the said City, or its officers and agents, for or on account of any injury or damage received or sustained by any person, structure or property, by or from the said Vendor, servants or agents, or by, or on account of, any act or omission of the said Vendor, or servants or agents, in the performance of this contract; and the Vendor hereby agrees that so much of the money due to under, and by virtue of, this agreement, as shall be considered necessary by said Purchasing Agent, may be retained by the City until'all such suits or claims for damages as aforesaid, shall have been settled, and evidence furnished to the satisfaction of said Purchasing Agent,provided, however,that notice of such claims, in writing and signed by the claimants, shall be previously filed in the offices of the City Clerk of said City. 6. It is furthermore agreed by the Vendor that the performance of this contract shall be strictly in accordance with Bid B-17 now on file at the Office of the City Purchasing Agent of Salem, Massachusetts,which Bid B-17 is hereby made a part of this contract by reference. 7. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF,the City agrees to pay the Vendor the following : $147,222.22, Reference Number must be on all invoices, said payments to be made upon the twentieth day of the month for such or as have been delivered by said Vendor to the City during the month next previous thereto and upon the bills for same Tam ,,p ,, ,,AN.Provided also that Demolition of Flynntan Building shall have been delivered in accordance with this contract. 8. INSURANCE COVERAGE: General - The Vendor shall before commencing performance of the Contract be responsible for providing and maintaining insurance coverage in force for the life of the Contract of the kind and in adequate amounts to secure all of the obligations under the Contract and with insurance companies licensed to write insurance in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. All such insurance carried shall not be less than the kinds and amounts designated herein, and the Vendor agrees that the stipulation herein of the kinds and limits of coverage shall in no way limit the liability of the Vendor to any such kinds and amounts of insurance coverage. All policies issued shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Salem, its agents and employees from any and all claims for damages to persons or property as may rise out of the performance of this Contract. Vendor's Comprehensive General Public Liabilitv and Propertv Damage Liability Insurance -The Vendor shall carry Comprehensive General Liability Insurance providing for a limit of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for all damages arising out of bodily injury to or death of one person, and subject to that limit for each person, a total limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death of two or more persons in any one accident; and Vendor's Comprehensive Property Damage Liability Insurance providing for a limit of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident, and subject to that limit per accident, a total (or aggregate) limit or not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period. Comprehensive Automotive and Propertv Damage Insurance - The Vendor shall carry Automobile Insurance covering all owned vehicles, hired vehicles or non-owned vehicles under the control of the Vendor while performing work under the Contract in the amount of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of one person and subject to that limit for each person, a total of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more persons in any one accident; and Property Damage coverage in the amount of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (5500,000.00) for all damages to or destruction of property. The Vendor must carry Workman's Compensation Insurance in the amounts prescribed under Massachusetts State Law and meet all other City and State Laws and Regulations. No cancellation(s) of such insurance, whether by the insurer or by the insured party shall be valid unless written notice thereof is given by the parties proposing. cancellation to the other party and to the City of Salem at least fifteen (15) days prior to the intended effective date thereof, which date shall be expressed in said notice, which shall be sent by registered mail,return receipt requested. These provisions shall apply to the legal representative(s), trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee, trustee, and successor(s) in interest of the Vendor. All insurance coverage shall be at the sole expense of the Vendor and shall be placed with such company as may be acceptable to the City of Salem and shall constitute a material part of the contract documents. Failure to provide written proof to City and continue in force such insurance as aforesaid shall be deemed a material breach of the contract, and may constitute sufficient grounds for immediate termination of the same. 9. This Agreement may be terminated upon Ten (10) days prior written notice for failure of Vendor to provide adequate service as determined by the Purchasing Agent. 10. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This Agreement is subject to the provisions of Massachusetts law, and to all lawful implementing regulations, as amended from time to time. 11. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said; (Regional Industrial Services, 79 Hixon Street, Bellingham, MA 02019); Vendor hath caused these presents and an instrument of like tenor to be executed in its name and behalf by a properly authorized officer of said company. An instrument of like tenor to be executed by the City in its name and behalf by its Mayor; its Purchasing Agent, and its Director of Public Property. \I All duly authorized as aforesaid, and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed. Regional Industrial CITY OF SALEM Services By: By: Rohe'e-T Authorized Officer(print) Stanley J. Usovi r., Mayor Authorized Signa re _ C. Hill,Jr., Purchasing Agent_- - erector of Public Prop rty, Peter K Strout Bruce Guy, Finance Director I Approved as to form by: iam J. Lundre , Esq., City Solicitor iJ� . /� . _ . .. .. [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 March 28, 2005 -=r Mr. Stanley Usovicz Jr. �. Salem Mayor's Office MAR 3 U 2005 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 CITYQFSALEM MAYOR'S OFFICE Re: 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA RAO Statement Dear Mayor, On behalf of Close Cousins Realty Trust, and SP Inc., please find enclosed the Response Action Outcome Statement for the release at 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA. Please review this information and call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SP Engineering, Inc. S Mes CC: BOH, DEP G RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME STATEMENT For I ' 1 SALEM, MA 01970 RTM#3-00 24051 mr4^' �'l� t!! 'aCiWRLIt(({Rgy, ^'+.-�-•-�-�-� .��> � . . ."' � ill If. �ll��I[�11� ) ,�,�€��"�' ' .i� It�t l tl �r �+�►1°I - 'aR.e ik y.,'Y•'�=+w#wt�N��+.Rs�,: ��g45'" yeti �.+.ix lr+. � .•= _ n �� rt"i;_y -.!•i 3 rv,� mit #'""h'F t..-a �, •`+ � Prepared CLOSE COUSINS REALTY TRUST 71 I.AFAYETTE STREET SALEM, MA 01970 Prepared i BRUCE SP ENGINEERING, INC. 45 CONGRESS STREET SALEM, MA 0170 a a DECEMBER ' 1 . . BRAWLEY a A Table of Contents 9 Webb Street INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION REMEDIATION SITE INVESTIGATIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS FEASIBILITY EVALUATION CONCLUSION FIGURES Figure One - Site Locus Figure Two - Site Plan • Figure Three -Environmental First Search-ASTM Map Figure Four- Groundwater Profiles TABLES Table One - Remaining Soil Analysis Table Two— Petroleum.Analysis Table Three—Remaining Soil Metal Analysis Table Four - Removed Soil Analysis Table Five— Groundwater VPH Analysis APPENDIX Waste Manifests& BOL Photographs Soil Logs • DEP Forms • Lab Reports ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 • Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 December 7, 2004 DEP Northeast Regional Office Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup I Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Re: Response Action Outcome Statement 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA RTN-3-0024051 To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find a Response Action Outcome(RAO) Statement Transmittal Form (BWSC-104) pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1056 for the above referenced site. SP Engineering, Inc., has completed the Release Abatement Measure (RAM)Plan submitted in July 2004, on behalf of the property owner for soil removal activities conducted at the property located at 9 Webb Street in Salem, Massachusetts. INTRODUCTION The site is currently a vacant lot approx. 0.5 acres in size in a multi-story residential neighborhood. A sheepskin tannery, Richard Leather Co. had existed on the property since 1860 and was in production until 1995. The vacant building was used to store construction equipment until it was demolished in 2001. The building had occupied 90% of the site. The wastewater produced by the manufacturing operation was pretreated in accordance with Federal EPA regulations and discharged into the SESD sewer system. There was no on site disposal of wastewater or solids. The 8,000 gallon underground fuel tank was cleaned and removed in 2001, with no evidence of leakage or contaminated soils observed by the Fire Dept. upon removal. The underground solvent tank (mineral spirits) had been removed in 1985, but the impacted soils were left in the ground. The Environmental First Search database did not reveal any releases on or around the subject site. 1 ILII A Phase H Environmental Assessment was conducted at the site in April 2003, to determine the subsurface conditions. Six borings and five monitoring wells were placed on the property. The results of the soil analyses showed the soils and groundwater in the area of the solvent tank grave, former boiler room and original wastewater settling tank had been impacted by aliphatic petroleum compounds 450- 2000 mg/kg, and volatile organics (substituted benzene compounds, 16.3-253 mg/kg). The source of the contamination was likely the Stoddard's solvent (mineral spirits)used to degrease the sheepskin and 42 fuel oil. The Stoddards was mixed with pickled skins, drained and recycled with a distillation unit. Chlorinated solvents and PCBs were not detected in the soil samples. The soils from 8-12' below grade were visibly stained in the area of the solvent tank grave and boiler room. The area of the original wastewater treatment tank had impacted soils from 4-8' below grade. In both cases grey silt and clay under the impacted soils likely prevented further migration of the constituents. The impacted soil was removed in September 2004, stockpiled on plastic and recycled at an asphalt batching plant under a DEP BOL in November 2004. Chemical characterization of the soil piles found they were acceptable for recycling. Two hundred and seventy tons of soil were removed from the site to be recycled. The groundwater encountered during soil excavation was pumped to an Enpro Environmental Inc. vacuum truck for off site treatment. Soil piles were placed in plastic and covered with plastic and fenced to minimize human contact or migration. The manifest and BOL can be found in the appendix. Release Abatement Measures are remedial activities which are limited in scope and complexity, and are implemented at a disposal site to reduce risk and/or increase the cost effectiveness of the overall remedial response for the site. The purpose of this RAM was to remediate impacted soils and groundwater containing Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). 2 • (a). As specified in 310 CAM 40.1003(4), a clear and accurate description of the location of the site or italize the location and boundaries of the disposal site or portion of the disposal site to which the RAO applies; SITE DESCRIPTION The Site is located north of Derby Street at the corner of Webb Street and Cousin Street and is bound by an urban mixture of multi-family residential properties. The Salem tax assessors map identifies the site as Lot 154 on Map 095 containing 23,730 sq.ft. A Site Locus Plan is provided in Figure 1. Currently the site exists as an unoccupied vacant lot. The site had previously been occupied by Richard Leather Co., a tannery(1940-1995). Before then another tanner, who constructed the building in 1929, occupied the site. The landform is relatively flat and saltwater bodies (Collins Cove and Salem Harbor) exist 500 yards to either side to the north and south. An underground solvent tank used by the tannery was removed in 1985, but contaminated soil was left behind. The former tank grave and petroleum source areas have been delineated. The new property owner plans to build multiple single family houses on the premises. The remainder of the site will be paved or landscaped. The primary areas of concern are the west corner of the property behind the former boiler room where the solvent tank grave exists and the east corner on Webb Street where the original settling tank had been located. A layer of visibly oil stained soil was found and delineated in these areas. There are no potable groundwater supplies or wetlands within 500' of the site, therefore groundwater is evaluated by the GW-2/3 criteria. Subsoil values are compared to S-1 criteria, as there are residences surrounding the property and a park exists within 500 yards. The Universal Transverse Mercator and Latitude/Longitude for the site are as follows; LAT/Long North 420 31' 50" West 700 52' 15" UTM 4709500 mN 345420 mE The site is situated at an elevation of approximately 12 feet (4 meters)NGVD and the area is nearly level, sloping 2-3 feet from the southeast comer (rear)to the northeast corner, which is the intersection of Cousins Street and Webb Street and location of MW#3. The groundwater ranges from 8-10' below the surface 3 6 Boa Rt �� 'l rj anrpr� .�f..\•`�'•�JJyI"� _.��rr ' I.. i :y�1 � i - /r �61�., p\ 4infet�`�O�"h �.. lf�\ tlinp ti /. r r• t \ 'm r I !B \ Central \ Canerery 5x/ ;. ,` tg��. � ✓'E / � �< v 15r a M e �/ 5r, BrrU,f� oxH�/�� .i^',: � �;I \. .•`�ayF D .,� 1 c q/: r- �I r• � t �� +�J 4i cq �� : �I i51 �.(\ ..._. � ., P•, it 'rllri i� e N 5. /!{at�'3 ,. � l�.__ � ;;'\ T'' 'Pam i �,t a• :�� r ... 1, 5 ea �e r-:?•' I Golt Course , J 4y oil Fu 7? i I I ,` POr i/ Vmwootl Pak r� rosy r, � rr c .. _.- ' GolfCnurce`v� I1 Sate sch � \\ � J ` /x '�. r rr T ! I I✓Joh`� rc �� it fF ';Na refreaq r � r- ! 'J.liSrn{ I e � � / c•I �MAR4��q�' . o al ,,r 1f :Fi a .a �/'!� /'��' !',`ter•.`Ji JIhtCF </??\"•Z` = to ti � ` ' ! iC r /• r.,i � . Is'and 5t ® +/ Cr }ort•iG \ arm�t fry GrDv@a t �, d I r /,til �" e5 � fir♦ -Poweplan •� Boat gimp rubra,,,� -J J , �+ •_ Halhide ' °✓`. , / \ `C�metary w_ \f✓ - I iCO��,. D 6. 0 1/ r �,.. .� 1, `.M Sale O ...:,° ' Rock t s1 _I - �� 1' � �' Commo • Calem Terminal 'W' _. SITE"a, `� '� — — - , Z ° s t / V. >L9hi Folger } Wkeh �•YV,fir �R 5 { - Point ¢�faOU\:J \\ •�}ank�\ \ Point . S A/L t^/C . °'P`o,� L� .• � �S' t/.•faoMSP � ��. � ua as:.- . amu. f4? r/1GI . r.. /.-. Palmer .Point_ _ . ._ /— -- '�' SaYA kvu ,.—. % ..I ""�,� \LSI Y! 1 �\ `-"� �C�'-• �4r y '^ rL � avf ,�a ._ r'\ \ 1 t 0 ��,\�\\\. Park v�PickeriJrg ' /\.` r �\� ScheiA .).1 , O 11i .kG YS\PARK_ 'Ta -^_- �,�, r *r '� `� � �c'r?:.-• • J/ (b). `For all Class Response Action Outcomes, a demonstration that all uncontrolled sources have peen eliminated or controlled". REMEDIATION The objective of the RAM was to remediate reported VOCs and EPH impacted soil. Soils were excavated until the S-1 Standards for the compounds of concern as defined in the MCP, were achieved and a condition of"No Significant Risk" was reached and a permanent solution was obtained. The remediation on September 7, 2004 occurred in the east comer of the property where the former wastewater settling tank and TB #4 were located. The original settling tank/screen chamber was used from 1930 to 1960 when it was replaced by a concrete tank. It had been made of wood and leakage had occurred. The soils were stained in a circle around the roughly 6'x8' box. The soil fill layers were screened with a Photoionizer detector(PID) "in situ" and contaminated layers (whether visually stained or with elevated VOCs) were excavated. The excavation was 22'x12' and 8' deep. Approximately 70 cy of impacted soil was removed. A minor volume of groundwater was encountered on the hard silt layer at 8'. The wood planks, steel and concrete were separated from the removed soils. The Site Layout and soil removal areas can be seen in Figure 2. The second area was the west corner of the gate adjacent to Cousins Street where the solvent tank had been located. After the solvent tank was removed in 1985 the contaminated soil and new gravel were returned to the excavation. Historically, the site had not been filled with grey ash, slag, glass and leather fibers, because the tannery occupied 90% of the site. The primary remediation concerns were VOCs and EPH compounds. The tank grave was well defined because of the gravel bedding. The soils were screened with a PID to identify the extent of contamination. All soil from 8' below grade was removed to the natural silt and clay at 12' below grade. Concentrations of VOCs in the top soil and rubble layers, were less than 10 ppm. These materials were segregated and returned to the excavation. • 5 ST � WEag MW 3 � W. DAY I y Former borscreen Former MW 4 1 wastewater ! + settling tank ` —. J 0 1— Former PCB W transformers W Former Building Outline F— � Fence„ U) o SOIL REMOVAL } > AREAS 9/2004 C) MW5 RAY 2 (Monitoring Well ) (n 01 d boxroom I o i ice.- -3OOOgol, mineral MW I T B 6 s 'rits tank.Removed 1985 qLine(Test Bore) IIR.O.W.MW- 2 ___8OOOgal, No. 2 fuel oil tank Removed 2001 property Scaled°=30' • SITE PLAN 9 WEBB STREET SP INC. SALEM, MA FIGURE 2 On September 8, 2004 the soils in the tank grave area (TB #6)that were obviously contaminated at 8- 12' (PID, 10-60 ppm)were removed down to the grey silt layer and contained in plastic for characterization. The depth of this excavation correlated with the tank tie down slab found at 8' below grade. Adjacent to the tank grave is the boiler room area, (TB#2)which had 3-4' of dark oil stained soil under the concrete floor at 4' below grade (PID, 10-35 ppm). These excavations extended from the west corner of the lot 20' in to the east and 50' lona to the north and generated approximately 110 cubic yards of soil. Sidewall and bottom samples were collected to confirm that the removal was complete. The excavation encountered groundwater at 9-10' below grade and a vacuum truck was employed to remove oily groundwater during the deeper excavation. The soil piles were tested and the results indicated that the soil was suitable for recycling as asphalt. There were no PCBs, heavy metals, or chlorinated solvents detected that would exclude recycling. This report has been prepared in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan(MCP), 310 CMR 40.0440. The oily soils (270 tons) removed from tank graves was loaded and transported to Aggregate Industries in Stoughton under a DEP BOL on November 5 and 8, 2004 for recycling. (c). For all Class A Response Action Outcomes, information aipporting the conclusion that a level of No Significant Risk has been achieved, • 7 • SITE INVESTIGATIONS A Phase II Site Investigation was conducted in April 2003 by SP Engineering, Inc., which included the installation of five monitoring wells and water/soil sampling and analysis. These previous test results had shown concentrations of contaminants that exceeded the S-1 criteria in two areas. The soil contaminants of concern were the extractable petroleum hydrocarbons at 2000 mg/kg Cq-Ci8 aliphatics and the volatile organic compounds, naphthalene at 5.0 mg/kg, and 1,2,4 trimethyl benzene at 253 mg/kg. The concentrations of metals in the soil samples were elevated with the highest lead concentrations being 271 mg/kg 6-8' below grade at TB #2, and 126 mg/kg at TB #5, 04'. Chromium was detected in two unpaved areas, TB #1 and TB 43, at 206 mg/kg and 376 mg/kg respectively. The chromium was likely from small particles of leather which contain trivalent chromium as a mordant. Since Richard Leather Company made sheepskin garment suede for apparel and clothing, they buffed the skins with an abrading mill. Some of the leather particles may have been discharged to the air and deposited on the soil. The buffing dust and shavings generated from the dry working of leather was delisted from the federal EPA RCRA regulations in 1985, along with trimmings, screenings and sludge, K053-K057, because the chromium was found to be exclusively trivalent and not readily leachable. For these reasons the low levels of chromium detected do not pose a health risk and are below the RGS-1 standard of 1000 mg/kg. The soils were not found to contain significant levels of cadmium, barium, arsenic, selenium, silver or mercury. Boring#4 was located at the former settling tank and transformer pad. Chemical analyses by EPA Method 8080 did not detect PCBs. After the remediation in September 2004, the remaining soils (sidewall and bottoms of excavations) were sampled and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260B for volatiles and the for petroleum compounds using the MA VPH and EPH method. After the soils were removed from the site in November 2004, the monitoring wells were purged and sampled. Several determinations of groundwater levels were made to predict groundwater flow direction, which appears to be south to north to MW#3 at the comer of Cousins and Webb Street. The assessment of significant risk is based upon the comparison of the test results with regulatory criteria. 8 ANALYSIS RESULTS Excavation on September 7, 2004 conducted in the area of the settling tank produced approximately 70 cubic yards of soil and was concluded with sidewall and bottom soil sampling. The results of the volatile analyses are shown in Table 1. The concentrations of VPH for the four sidewall (4-8') and bottom (at 8') samples were less than reporting limit with the exception of the east sidewall which contained 502 mg/kg C9-C12 aliphatics compared to a S-1 limit of 1000 mg/kg. Butyl benzene was detected in the north sidewall soil at 0.48 mg/kg compared to a limit of 100 mg/kg. The EPH analyses are shown in Table 2. The soil samples did not contain detectable concentrations of EPH (<100 mg/kg), compared to the removed soil pile which contained 890 mg/kg, C9-C18 aliphatics, 210 mg/kg C19-036 aliphatics and 1495 mg/kg aromatic petroleum hydrocarbons, which were above the S-1 criteria. The remaining soils contained low concentrations of PAHs; acenaphthene, benzo (g,h,i) perylene, dibenzo (a,h) anthracene and ideno (1,2,3 cd) pyrene, below the S-1 limits. The metal analyses shown on Table 3 for both days of excavation are typical of background levels with the highest lead value being 80.2 mg/kg. The highest chromium concentration was 122 mg/kg. • The soil removed from the solvent tank grave on September 8, 2004 contained VOC constituents typical of mineral spirits. Two sidewalls, north and east at the 8-12' layer had detectable concentrations of naphthalene 0.153 to 1.01 mg/kg and the surface soil under pile sample contained naphthalene at a concentration of 0.169 mg/kg, as shown in Table 1. There were no other volatile organics detected. The VPH analyses on five samples revealed one, the north sidewall, with detectable C9-Clo aromatics at 51.7 mg/kg. This one sample is over the S-I limit of 50 mg/kg but the exposure point concentration (approximately 31.7 mg/kg) is less than the S-1 criteria. There were no chlorinated solvents or PCBs detected. These concentrations are all below the S-1 criteria. The petroleum analysis of the sidewalls samples, from September 8, detected only pyrene at 0.55 to 0.70 mg/kg, which is below the S-1 criteria of 700 mg/kg. The removed soils were characterized for disposal at Aggregate Industries. The results of these analyses are shown in Table 4. The groundwater analytical results are shown in Table 5. Low concentrations of VOCs were detected in MW#2 and 44. MW 44, on the east comer of the site, contained the highest concentrations of VOCs, however these values were still below the GW-2/3 standards. Metal analyses showed slightly elevated lead at 0.014 and 0.016 compared to a limit of 0.03. 9 The permanent monitoring wells have been sampled now that the site is backfilled. Soils and groundwater were sampled and analyzed to assess current conditions after soil removal. As shown in the Tables, the recent analyses show the subsoils and groundwater still contain traces of petroleum residues; however the levels are below the applicable S-1 and GW 2/3 criteria. There are no drinking water supplies or sensitive wetlands in the area and the site will be developed with housing, a parking area and landscape fringe. There is minimal potential for off site impacts or human exposure, therefore, we feel the release abatement measures completed have eliminated the sources of continuing release and restored the property to a condition suitable for residential use. (d). For all Class C Response Action Outcomes, information supporting the conclusions that no substantial hazards remain at the disposal site; The Disposal Site is not classified as a Class C Response Action Outcome, and therefore this does not apply. (e). For all Class A Response Action Outcomes, information documenting the extent to which levels of oil andlor hazardous materials in the environmental have been reduced to background, and for all A-2 RAO's, the results of the feasibility evaluation conducted pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0860. FEASIBILTY EVALUATION A feasibility evaluation pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0860 was developed for the site. In summary, small amounts of contaminated soil may remain around the perimeter of the tank graves at 8' below grade and possibly at the groundwater table at levels below Method 1 S-1 Standards, but above background. In addition, low concentrations of VOCs and EPH(also below Method 1 GW2/3 Standards) remain in the groundwater at the site. Two hundred and seventy tons of petroleum contaminated soil were excavated • and removed from the site, however, eliminating a source of continuing release. Additional excavation of residual soil at the groundwater table was not performed due to the low concentrations of contaminants remaining, the significant costs associated with the excavation conducted and the potential impacts of excavating additional soil below the water table. 10 • Achieving background concentrations in the soil was not feasible in that according to 310 CMR 40,0860 (4), "a remedial action alternative that would achieve a Permanent Solution or would reduce the concentrations of oil and hazardous material in the environment at the disposal site to levels that achieve or approach background shall be considered feasible unless: (b)the costs of conducting remediation, or the risks resulting from the alternative would not be justified by the benefits". Significant expense has been involved in the excavation, analysis and off-site disposal of the contaminated soil. Therefore, due to the low concentrations of VOCs and EPH remaining, it is the opinion of SP Inc., that according to 310 CMR 40.0860(6)(a), "the incremental cost of conducting the remedial action alternative is substantial and disproportionate to the incremental benefit of risk reduction, environmental restoration and monetary and non-pecuniary values". In addition, the historical industrial uses of the general area likely have resulted in elevated background concentrations. (fl. For all Class A-4 and B-3 Response Action Outcomes, (the results of the evaluation conducted pursuant to 310 CMR 40,0860 demonstrating that the achievement of Upper Concentration Limits in Soil located at a depth greater than 13 feet from the ground mirface or in the area beneath an engineered barrier is not feasible; As this is a Class A-2 Response Action Outcome this does not apply. (g). A copy of any and all Activity and Use Limitations which have been implemented under 310 CMR 40,1070; Not applicable for this site. (h). Where the RAO is based upon the implementation of an Activity and Use Limitation, an Activity and Use Limitation Opinion as specified in 310 CMR 40.1071, or 310 CMR 40.1074, which ever is applicable; Not applicable,for this site. • (i). A description of any operation, maintenance, and br monitoring that will be required to maintain those conditions at the disposal site upon which the RAO is based; 11 There are no specific exclusions or conditions placed upon the development or residential use of the property. Should any unnatural materials or volatiles be encountered in the foundation excavation, then the provisions of the RAM plan should be applied and an LSP should assess additional remedial requirements. For all Class C Response Action Outcomes, a copy of the plan, as specified in 310 CMR 40.0861 (2) (h), ivhich presents definitive and enterprising steps to be taken toivard achieving a Permanent Solution at the disposal site; This does not apply to the disposal site addressed by this RAO as it is not a Class C Response Action Outcome. The off-site disposal for two hundred and seventy tons of contaminated soil and other debris was performed in accordance with the RAM plan for RTN 3-0024051 as detailed in this RAO Statement. . Remediation of the settling tank and solvent tank grave soils was completed on September 7 and 8, 2004 and the soil was recycled at Aggregate Industries in Stoughton on November 5 and 8, 2004. The confirmatory soil testing performed by SP Inc., following the RAM programs confirms that a condition of"No Significant Risk" exists at the site, and as such it is the opinion of David L. Bramley (LSP #7639) that the requirements of a Class A-2 Response Action Outcome specified in 310 CMR 40.0000 have been met at the Disposal Site addressed by this RAO. Finally, the Certification of Submittal required by 310 CMR 40.0009 is included in the attachment form BWSC-104, a copy of which is included in the Appendix of this report. Respectfully submitted, S,/P�Engineering, Inc. Reviewed by: ,,, Bruce M. Poole President David L. Bramley, L • BMP/sm TABLE ONE 9 WEBB STREET • REMAINING SOIL VOLATILE ANALYSIS Day 1, Sidewalls DEP 409017 409018 409019 409020 409021 S-1 VPH mg/kg North East South West Bottom Limit C5-C8 Aliphatics NT <50 <50 <50 <50 100 C.9-C12 Aliphatics NT 502 <500 <500 <500 1000 C9-C10 Aromatics NT <50 <50 <50 <50 100 mg/kg Benzene <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 40 Butyl benzene 0.480 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 100 MBTE <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 100 Naphthalene <010 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 100 Toluene <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 500 • Xylene <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 500 Day 2, Sidewalls 409023 409024 409025 409026 409027 Under S-1 VPH mg/kg North East South West Bottom Pile Limit C5-Cs Aliphatics <50 NT <50 <50 <50 <50 50 C9-C12 Aliphatics <500 NT <500 <500 <500 <500 500 C9-CIG Aromatics 51.7 NT <50 <50 <50 <50 50 Benzene <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 40 MBTE <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 100 Naphthalene 1.01 0.153 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.169 100 Toluene <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 500 Xylene <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 500 • NT = Not tested. These sample were analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260B rather than MA VPH. TABLE TWO 9 WEBB STREET . PETROLEUM ANALYSIS Day 1 Day 2 Sidewall Sidewall Removed Sidewall Sidewall Removed DEP SOIL 409018 409019 409022 409023 409024 409028 S-1 Extractable Petroleum East West Pile North East Pile Limits Compounds mg/kg C5-Cs Aliphatics <100 <100 890 <100 <100 <100 1000 C9-C12 Aliphatics <100 <100 210 <100 <100 <100 2500 C9-Cio Aromatics <10C <100 1495 <100 <100 102 800 PAHs mg/kg Phenanthrene ND ND 0.21 ND ND ND 100 Napthalene ND ND 16.6 ND ND 1.02 100 2 Methyl-napthalene ND ND 14.2 ND ND ND 500 Acenapthene 0.643 0.863 0.677 ND ND 1.81 1000 Anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1000 • Benzo (a) anthracene ND ND 0.388 ND ND ND 0.7 Benzo (a) pyrene ND ND 0.293 ND ND ND 0.7 Benxo (b) fluoranthene ND ND 0.193 ND ND ND 0.7 Benzo (g,h i) perylene 0.297 0.630 1.62 ND ND ND 1000 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND ND 0.579 ND ND ND 1000 Chrysene ND ND ND ND ND ND 7.0 Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene ND 0.404 0.624 ND ND ND 0.7 Fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1000 Fluorene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1000 Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ND 0.186 0.287 ND ND ND 0.7 Pyrene ND ND 8.81 0.706 0.556 ND 700 ND =Non Detectable (0.10 mg/kg) • TABLE THREE 9 WEBB STREET . REMAINING SOIL METAL ANALYSIS METALS MG/KG CADMIUM CHROMIUM LEAD Day 1, Settling Tank North Sidewall, 4-8' 0.081 48.5 34.6 East 4-6' 0.129 32.6 28.6 South Sidewall, 4-8' 0.092 75.7 33.0 West Sidewall, 4-8' 0.041 122 35.0 Bottom 8' 0.018 20.8 16.3 Day 2, Tank Grave North Sidewall, 8-12' 0.043 17.6 46.8 • East Sidewall, 8-12' 0.14 21.1 80.2 South Sidewall, 8-12' 0.102 14.4 35.8 West Sidewall, 8-12' 0.175 14.8 42.7 Bottom 12' 0.070 7.94 3.76 S-1 Limits 30 1000 300 • TABLE FOUR 9 WEBB STREET REMOVED SOIL. ANALYSIS Day I Day H Shrewsbury, MA Soil Pile Soil Pile Aggregate Industries 409022 409028 Acceptance Limits mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Method 8260 Volatile Organics 17.7 2.13 500 Chlorinated Solvents <.05 <.05 5 PCBs 8082 <.02 2 Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon C5-Cs Aliphatics <50 <50 C9-C12 Aliphatics 521 842 Cs-Clo Aromatics 449 151 Extractable Petroleum • Hydrocarbons 50,000 C9-C18 Aliphatics 890 <100 C19-C36 Aliphatics 210 <100 C11-C22 Aromatics 1495 102 Flashpoint °F >200 140 Metals Arsenic 7.3 6.56 30 Cadmium .20 .45 30 Chromium 15.5 16.3 500 Lead 143 197 1000 Mercury 0.32 0.24 10 Reactivity pH 7.14 7.99 2-12 Sulfide 36.2 17.6 1000 Cyanide 153 19.7 100 TABLE FIVE 9 WEBB STREET • GROUNDWATER VPH ANALYSIS, 12/9/04 DEP GROUNDWATER MW #1 MW #2 MW#3 MW #4 GW-2/3 VPH mg/1 South Corner Tank Grave North Corner Settling Tank Limit C5-Cs Aliphatics <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 1 C9-C12 Aliphatics <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1 C9-C10 Aromatics <0.10 0.129 <0.10 <0.10 4 VOLATILES mg/l Benzene ND ND ND ND 2 Ethylbenzene ND ND ND 0.007 4 METE ND ND 0.002 ND 50 Naphthalene 0.001 0.003 ND 0.019 6 Toluene ND ND ND ND 6 . M& p Xylene ND ND ND ND 6 o Xylene ND ND ND ND 6 ND = Not detected <0.0005 mg/1 METALS mg/l Cadmium 0.0036 <.005 0.0051 0.009 0.01 Chromium 2.0 Lead <0.01 <0.01 0.019 0.014 0.03 EPH mg/l C9-Cjs Aliphatics 0.90 <0.5 1 C19-C36 Aliphatics <2.0 <2.0 20 CH-C22 Aromatics 1.39 0.667 30 • Naphthalene 0.005 0.022 6 CA' Environmental FirstSearch v 1 Mile Radius FI�IRSTS ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites w• 0 59 �\4 9 Sale \ x- \ e 6 92 9 s, .r okairy ti 5 53 35 i 43 1 i r O s 37 0 iver 0 Paw � n \ Pak Source: 1999 U.S. Census TIGER Files ��j Target Site(ladiudc:42.515776 Longitude:-70.890144)........ FIGURE 'THREE Identified Site,Multiple Sites.Receptor............................ iii NPL.Solid Waste landfill(SWL)or Hazardous Waste..............__........._ Railroads............................................................................I....................... — Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents 500 0.Radius Dwelling Garage Garage E28 Dwelling Ns 7 Shed N2 8 1/2 R Granite12 13 • WOrUMIA1 � 14\ Curb (Typical) • 1 \ ` MMMMMI REA \ \ \\ j 5.0 w Cf) 1 4'� sGW PROFILE 13 ' FLOW 12 -04-04 \ SOIL �\TYP.1 REMOVAL •\ \` �\ IRECTION \ AREA D \\`14 1 � 4.0 \ 11 `• `• DAY I I \ 12 — — — — \ TANK \ — - - - — — — � \ GRAVE \ : \ MW-3 ` \ MW-2 CD Uj BENCHMARK COUSINS STREET Hydrant Spindle Elevation 12.88 MON. WELL RIM ELEV. GROUNDWATER ELEVATION FIGURE 4 12/6/04 12/9/04 N° I 13,69 4,28 5, 11 GROUNDWATER PROFILES °- , 2 13.00 3:92 4:75 9 Webb Street 3 11:78 3.45 4103 Salem, MA 4 12.39 3.73 4:31 SF INC. / y }T •¢ t4 *!- i'l Iowa saw \\ u.. , '.�'}t w 1a 4T�'`r +�}T 1 �;\3= tif.,:7' jam.. ' Y► � + ,. �� v , s � 41 fit? mm 11 y M !►9 r t r �Pl � x•1.1 x, If game* r r j _ :syn�r}, `� •� ••M 6 Y �p , tt% 6 a� 6ar1K� �ypesViS. its F»ed a6K�•�wost Nps XU� A,rt vt j*}*max, STODbARD SOLVENT weekly for 50 weeks. The kidneys and lung were the most seriously effected. When benzene in like manner was test- Mineral Spirits; White Spirits ed, it gave no evidence of skin absorption(4) and the LC, for benzene was found to be 1300 ppm. In comparison, - C91-120 other studies have indicated lethal concentrations for mice TLV, 100 ppm ( x 525 mg/m3) to be 16,000 ppm for heptane,m 13,500 ppm for octane,(5) and 3200 ppm (LCso 4 hours)ta) for nonane. STEL, 200 ppm ( aa 1050 mg/m3) Millions of industrial and domestic workers have been exposed to Stoddard solvent with minimal evidence of ser- Stoddard solvent is a mixture of straight and branched ious health effects, apart from its defatting and irritating chain paraffins, naphthenes (cycloparaffins) and aromatic action on the skin. hydrocarbons. 4t is a colorless liquid with a kerosene-like Relatively few data are available on the actual concen- odor. Using the chemical formula above, the molecular trations of vapor such exposures have involved, however. weight would be 128.25. The reported specific gravity is - Oberg, in a survey of 30 dry cleaning plants in Detroit, 0.79, boiling range from 154 to 202'C and a flash point found an average exposure of 65 ppm, with a TWA of 35 greater than 100'F. Insoluble in water, Stoddard solvent is ppm, for Stoddard solvents with flash points of about miscible with benzene, absolute alcohol, ether, chloro- 105° F t7) The worst plant had an estimated average expo- form, carbon tetrachloride and carbondisulfide. sure of 1.35 to 200 ppm. It is used as a diluent in paints, coatings and waxes; as Carpenter et aRz)suggested 200 ppm as a hygienic stan- dry cleaning agent; as a degreaser and cleaner in mechani- dard for man. cal shops; and as a herbicide, NIOSH,on the other hand,proposed a workplace envi- Aspirationnl of the liquid results in diffused chemical ronmental standard of 350 mg/m3,corresponding to about irritation of the lungs resulting in edema, a few milliliters 60 ppm.(e) The NIOSH recommendation,on a mg/m3 basis, may be fatal in these incidents. is the same for all refined petroleum solvents, from petro- Carpenter et al(2) found that inhalation of 8200 mg/m3 leum ether to mineral spirits and Stoddard solvents, includ- (1400 ppm), substantially air saturation at 25'C, caused ing 140 Flash aliphatic solvent.The latter is not included in death of 1 of 15 rats in 8 hours. Beagle dogs and cats had this discussion. NIOSH also proposed a 15 minute ceiling spasms and died at this concentration. There were no sig- of 1800 mg/m), or about 310 ppm. nificant effects in dogs that inhaled 330 ppm, 190 ppm and It is recommended that the current TLV of 100 ppm be 84 ppm,6 hours daily,5 days/week for 13 weeks (65 expo- retained for Stoddard solvent. This limit was calculated sure days). However, rats at 330 ppm for 65 days showed from data on the toxicities of its major ingredients,and was slight kidney damage.The rats from 300 ppm group had an designed primarily to prevent the irritative and narcotic ef- increase in blood-urea-nitrogen after 65 days. This may be fects of the vapors. Subsequent data, although somewhat associated with masked tubular regeneration and dilation difficult to interpret, tend to confirm this value, in the of the loops of Henle as noted above for this level, opinion of the Committee.The occurrence of questionable In 15-minute inhalation period for people, slight eye ir- kidney injury from exposures not greatly in excess of 100 ritation was reported in 1 of 6 at 150 ppm. ppm(2l provides additional evidence of the desirability of a Rector et al(3) exposed rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, lower TLV than that which existed prior to the adoption of and monkeys 8 hours/day, 5 days/week for 30 exposure the 100 ppm value. days and also for 90 days continuously to vapors of mineral A STEL of 200 ppm, somewhat lower than the ceiling spirits used as a paint thinner by U.S. Navy. Their samples limit recommended by NIOSH, is suggested. met the Stoddard solvent specifications, in an 8-hour expo- sure at 290 ppm there was minor congestion and emphy- sema in guinea pigs lungs only.The rats did not show kid- References: ney lesions, which was different than Carpenter's findings 1. Gerarde, H.W.: Aliphatic hydrocarbons, Industrial Hygiene & for his strain of rats. None of the other test species showed Toxicology,2nd ed.,p.1198, Interscience, NY (1963). any signs of physiological damage at 290 ppm. 2 Carpenter,C.P.et at Tox. Appl, Pharm.32:282-297 (1975). Because Stoddard solvent contains 65%or more C,a and 3. Rector,D.E. et al: Ibid. 9257-268(1966). higher molecular weight hydrocarbonsM proper recogni- 4. Naw C.A.et al:,arch. Env. Health pp.382-393(1556). tion of decane and its homolog's hazardous nature should 5. Flury, F.,Zernik, F.: Schadliche Gase, pp. 257-264, I. Springer, be taken, Berlin (1931). Nau et al(4) found n-decane had an LCSo of 540 ppm for 6. Carpenter,C.P. et al: Tax Appl, Pharm.44:54(1978). mice exposed for 3.75 hours. This level was borne for 18 7. Ober&M.:Am. Ind, Hyg,Assoc. 1.29,.547 (1968). hours/day, 7 days/week by rats without significant effects & NtOSH: Criteria for a Recommended Standard-Occupational - after 123 days.Also,the n-decane was skin absorbed where Exposure to Refined Petroleum Solvents, DHEW (NIOSH) Pub. - application of 1633 grams (total) was applied 3 times No.77.192 (1977). 372 November 9, 2004 AGGREGATE BRUCE POOLE INDUSTRIES S.P. ENGINEERING 45 CONGRESS STREET BOX 848 SALEM, MA 01970 Re: Soil, Richard Leather Co. 9 Webb Street Salem,MA Release Tracking#: 3-24051 The recyclable soil from the above address was received at our facility on November 5, and 8, 2004. Attached are the shipper's log of soil receipts which total 270.22 tons along with the Bills of Lading and other receipt documentation. We will issue a"Certificate of Recycling"upon request after processing. Thank you for recycling soil at our Stoughton facility. Yours truly, r � I William R. Reinhardt—� L Manager, Soil Division AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES • Northeast Region 1101 Turnpike Street Stoughton,Massachusetts 02072 Telephone 781-344-1100 Facsimile 781-341-5523 OCT-26-2004 09:07 SP INC 978 745 4bH1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-0128 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Rwerr TnOine Nr�s� • BILL OF LADING (nsesu■M to aio Caala 4oaoaol E -124051 A. LOCATION OF SITE OR OISP04M SM WN®IE R ZDIATION WASTE WAS GENERATED: Release Nam(cptionel): Richard Leather Co. Street. 9 wphh strpet LocationAidk Corner of Cousins CityRawn 41em- r MA Zip Code: 01970 _ DalelPeriodofGeneration: _ /_ /1229to _ /_ /1985 Additional Release Tracking Numbors Associated wiet tis Bill at Lading: *Node If this AW of Latby As We Mall of a A"end nomew f AvUen(LR4)tokon prior to Mntlllestfaw,a Rafwe TmwAbV Number ir not waded. B. PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH BILL OF LADING: Name of Organ aarion: Close CousinSRealty Trust Nameolconfact: David Walsh Tale: Street: 71 Lafayette Street City/Town, Salem MA 01970 - State: Lp cc:e: — Telephare: 978 - 745 - 1746 6d. C. RELATIONSHIP TO RELEASE OR-THREAT OF RELEASE OF PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH BILL OF LADING: (check 01,110"Gelty) ® RP Specify(rade one): Owner Operator Generator Transporter Other RP: ❑ PRP Specify(circle one): Owner Operator Generator Transporter Other PRP. ❑ Fiduciary/Secured Lender ❑ Agency/Public UUlily on a Right of Way ❑ Other Person: If an owner anWw operator is not OwduMV the response action associated with the Bill Of Lading,provide on an attachment the name. contact Perron.address and telephone nu fiber,inclia7drtg any area code and eraensicn.for each.it(known. D. TRANSPORTERICOMMON CARRIER INFORMATIONt TransponedCommon Carrier Name: Aggregate Industries axuactPerson: William Reinhardt Tone: Street 1101 Turnpike Street ckylrownc Stoughton SIS. MA Zip 02072 one: Sal, _ Teleph781 - 341 - 5500 Cone L RECEIVING FACILIWITUIPGRARY STORAGE LOCATION: Operator/FacilayName: Aggregate Industries Contact Person: William Reinhardt Title: Sueet: 1101 Turnni kP Street City/rown: =Mq[hton yam: MA Zip Code 02072 _ Telephone: 781 - 341 -5500 134 Type of Faciley. ® Aedteft BatdtiCOM Mut ❑ Lar AKftpnsat ❑ incinerator (check one) ® A>'pfteh Ba NH*t h;x ❑ lanaMMaily Corer ❑ Temporary Storage ❑' Thermei Processing ❑ Laswastr royal rill ❑ Other: Division of Hazardous S- O 1 -029 MWskiWaste/Cass A Pernik a: �-^o•o�.`r5 Management of Slid waste MAD981 2135 anagement Perri[a; EPA Identification a. Actual/Anticipated Period Of Temporary SlwWe(specify dates it appiicehley /_ /_ to Reason to Temporary Storage(if approadep . A@Vft*d 101rr99 TAs hymn pmsadon recycled pvaper. Page 1-012 OCT-26=2`dt�a t7y t7tl 5r IN- pro rµa siert r.n��r AOasmchusetts DepaMnent of Enviroilunaental Protection DWSC-012A Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup reeiralrtcaq ran�ew BILL OF LADING toarauamt to ata cmx 4o ooaio) F-31-124051 E RzC=VWg FAt jLrrVn MPORANY STORAQE LOCATION (toonthaaad)t 1i Temporary Storage Address: Street City/Town: Slate: Do Cccm F. DESCWTION OF ROAMIATION WASTE tci+eck a*Mat apply) ® Conouninated Media(circls ail that applyk Soil Croundwator Surface Water Otter: ❑ C«ion irarted Oebda(circ*as that apply): DmnoitionlConettasion Waste Vegetation/organic Materials Inorganic Absortaht Materials Other. ❑ hlow hazardous Uncomainafted Waste(circle at trial appeyX Non•aqueous Phase Liquid Omer: ❑ Non-hazardous Containerized Waste(circle all that apply)! Tank Sontimsf9udges con!ainers Onans Engineered lorpoundmams Other: Type of Contam ation(circa all that apply): C,awline Diesel Fuel p2 Oil +ter D;! e.6 oil Waste OR Kerowe Jet Fuel Darer. Mineral SEiF3,ts Estimated volume of Materials. Cubic Yards: 200 Taw. 3n D Otter: Contaminant Source(check on*lapecifyY ❑ Ttaztsportation Aecidena [j Underground Storage Tank ❑oom: Response Action Associated with Sift of Lading tarcle onek vnmediate Response Action Release Abatement Measure Unity-Related Abatement Measure Limed Removal Action(LAA) Comprehensive Response Action Other(specifyY. Remediation Waste Characterization Support Documentation aaachad: ® Site History WormaLLan [jj Sampling and Analytical Methods and Prooedufas ® Labww--vy Data ❑ Field Screening Data It supporting docunentalion is not appended; provide an attachment stating the date and in connection with what document such information was previously submilttad to DEP. ii. LICENSED STE PROFER,�tt OVAL(LSP)OPWW16 Namectorganktatipn; SP SnQineering. Tnt!_ LsP Nana. David Bramlel+ Tga: Tdeplroa&; 9'79 — 745 4S6q Eon. � I I have personally usi med and am fa illar with the indormaton conmireld on and submitted with this lam. Based on this information.it is my Opinion chat this tasting and ausisvnent scions undenakeri were adequate to character®the Remediation Waste,n accordance with 310 CMR 40.D=.and that the faefly or London can accapt rarnrrdiaton wtuigild with the dgredarisfis t. i am aware that sigrd scant penwides including.but not limited W.possible fine&and imprisoerrrerM may_neadt if I via which I know to be false.+n tecuri ae,or rna anally rican+oble. Signature: sit: 0A Data: --j /.41,/ . 4 ( L. EY License Number: �G 3 9 BAANLn, * 9 No. 76Sg X81 � H. CER'TIFICA'TION OF PERSON CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WNUMLS BILL OF LADINGr I cantly under penalties of law that t have pamanally er awed and am farrow with the it ierm slow contained in this submittal, including any and all doauneras acoompertyng this+artification,and that.based on my inquiry of thoea itcly&Ws inm ediaiely responsible for obtaining Ills kntantat on,ate material niorrratiNt wined herein is.m the beat of my krcrdedge and belied,rue.accurate and complete. I wn aware there are signs Iters. including, but not limited to.possible fines and kMrisoraranL for wduty submitting tutee, inaccurate. Or tum inlonruaton Nana or Parson(pnnl): David Walsh RAI~ IrYtA'r • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-012C Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BILL OF LADING(pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030) Release Tracking Number SUMMARY SHEET OF u ' 2 U oSl I K. SUMMARY OF SHIPMENTS: Daily Volume Shipped Date of Shipment: Date of Receipt: Number of Loads Shipped: (cu.yds _ I I � I I � i • Summary Sheet Total Shipped: Bill of Lading Total Shipped � (only if different): Revised 10/3/94 Page 1 or 2 • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-012C Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BILL OF LADING(pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0030 Release Tracking Number SUMMARYSHEET 3 ZoS/ ONLY COMPLETE ONE COPY OF THIS PAGE AND ATTACH TO THE FINAL COPY OF THE SUMMARY SHEET. L. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF REMEDIATION WASTE AT RECEIVING FACILITY OR TEMPORARY STORAGE: Receiving Facility/Temporary Storage Representative(print): William R. Reinhardt Title: Manager ( ! Signature: ✓ - t✓t,d�t�� ' �, �-`- Data: /q M. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SHIPMENT AND RECEIPT OF REMEDIATION WASTE BY PERSON. CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BILL OF LADING: I certify under penalties of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this certification,and that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in herein is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete, I am aware that there are significant penalties,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,for willfully submitting false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. Signature: Date: Name of Person(print): Revised 10/3/94 Page 2 of 2 TICI{ET T1'gO.UIRY REFDORT -- 11/05/1.14 to 11/1 5,11Ur -==/0.5/04 _02:43=Pm-== =Aggregate Ind !stries-W Region page== 1__- ;ORT BY: CUSTOMER OCATION: 311 STOUGHTON TO 3311 STOUGHTON USTOMER: 999998 CASH SLS/STOUGHTON TO 999998 CASH SLS/STDUGHTON IRDER: 31113 SOIL/SALEM-WEBB ST TO 31113 SOIL/SALEM-WEBB ST 'ICKET LOCH DATE TIME IN CUSTOMER ORDER PRODUCT HAULER TRUCK ST BIN DISP QTY ----- ----- ----- ---------------- ------- --- ---- ------ ---- — --- ---- ------ 602961311 11/05 10:07 999998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE 7 52 0 81.60 TON ;602963 311 11105 10:09 999998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 57 0 20.53 TON ;603023 311 11/05 13:16 999998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL RUNEX 0 23.15 TON ;603027 311 11/05 13:28 999998 CASH SLS/S SOILISALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 57 0 25.69 TON ;603029 311 11/05 13:30 999998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 5c 0 18.33 TON 603039 311 11/05 13:45 999998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL H.M. MDR 0 0.00 TDt 603040 311 11/05 13:46 999998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL H.M. MDR 0 30.86 TON :ASH SLSISTGUGHTON TOTALS /t TICKETS 1%16 TON ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPORT TOTALS /TICKETS 150.16 TON Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-0126 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup A.T.K,.wq n+mgee BILL OF LADING (furnu.mto3ioCUR aa_posa► 3 ' 24051 • LOG SHEET OF L LOAD INFORMATION: LOAD 1�r atu - T nA epresentauve: Pear-.'�=acthry/Temoorary Storage Representative- . Date of Shipment: Tune of S'hnxnent: Date or °ezelpe Time of Recelot: (circle one)awdwn / (circle one s Truck/Tractor RegTrailer Registration (if arty): c c G1 pm ao. . /�y->Vrm 1; a' Load&Ze 1_J_ydG3ist: D f ELOAAD Signature Transport Reweseniawe: Recac,hty/Temporary Storage Reotesentatrve: p�rtent� ivne o!SivatranL' � Dafie of==c'�pc Time of ReCetptS L (circ a we)amfpmor Regstration. Tratiet Registration(if any): J/0 3G 'J Ic:rcle one)am pm 7``1fi^G //A 'ry .7 .yam Load Size fc., yusJtons): LOAD 3: Signature at Transponer Representative. ; Recery .!: =ac,hryr temporary Storage Represeniat,ae � f, Date of Shipment: Time of Shipment Date of =ece:oc Tone of Receipt: (arae one)amiom /� I Truck/rractor Registration: Trailer Registration(d any): ioucle onef am:pm Load Size tai.yas.dons): LOAD 4: Signature of Transporter Representative: Receiving =a_,htynemporary Storage Representative: , Date of Shipment Tune at Shipment Date of;:=:a or. Tune at Recetat (cuc:e one)amicm Trudrff'ractor Registration- - Trai:er Regsuation(if any): i (circle one)amipm Load Size.-:: vds.rtons): LOAD 5: Signature of Transdoner Representative: i Receiving zadwryiTemporary Storage Representai:ve: f 1 Date of Shipment Tore of Sfeoment: i Date of Re rfmu Time of Receipt: (circle one)atm� — TrucWTraaor Registration: Trailer Registration(if airy): (circle one)amici:, f Load Size tau.ydsAons): LOAD 6: Signature of Transooner Represematrve: Recaiwng=acmry/Ternwary Storage Recireseruae�e: i ! Date of Shipment: Time of Shipment: , Date of Recercc Time of Receipt f , (circle one)andpm 1 _._ Tru._ck/Tractor Registration: Trailer Registration(J any): tcucie one)amiem Load Size fcu.yas.,mn5):- LOAD 7: Signature at TranSooner Reptesentairve: Recarv+rtg=adarylTemtx+rary Storage Rewesensat+ve: Date of Stepment: i line of Sh,omenc Date of Recwpt 1line of Recept: f _ (clrete one)amnxn Truck/Tncctor Registration: Trailer Registration(if any): ` (code one)arn0r. , Load Size tcu v95AOne): . LOG SHEET VOLUME INFORMATION: Total Volume This Page(ci.'tds.tansl: Teat Carred Forward(c-i-:aunt's) I Taal Gamed Porwara and This Page(c..ycs,lons). ' '.evisea t07i t93 "--- --------------------------- Massachusetts Department of Environmentai Protection BWSC-012B Bureau of waste Site Cleanup a.r,.r...q run+oer BILL OF LADING tpunurmt to 310 CMR 40.0030) �- — LOG SHEET OF 371 - 24051 1. LOAti INFORMATION: LOAD t: Signature of Transporter R entawe: Rece, u /Tern I N Rotary Storage Representative wtrWi Date of SMp9ent: Tvae of SMor J Date dr =e-e, t Time at Receipt: (circle / Truckfrractor ReT sVaapn Tracer R4yrstratton (if any): ^) , J , (cucie ones am+Pm k7k-15 iv` Q ;,� t,r J �V ....`1'V `°'— i Load SrL_i.:,.Yds.non5i: O 1, CC LOAD t e d Door R entawe: Per: aciiityFemporary Storage Recresentairve: Date of SM ent: me of Shif6airinv. 0 a 'of Time of Receipt tcicieone)an TruckfTracC'tor RR{eg/rs�u7aao�n/j iraiier Regcs�u'�a'a7on(if any): , _746, 3 Q "�{cucie we)a 0 ' D !3` ;4 ''t �� y� �"A— i Load Size!c_ ydsJions): —"�j 7 LOAD 3: Signature of Transconer Reoresentauve_ Rece .=-ac:hryrTemporary Storage Representai,ve i 'i Date of Shipment: Time of Shromenr. Date of =ecero(- T"se of Receipt: (cacie we)amara eg eg ( any): i e one)amipni f Truck,/iraetor Registration: Trarer 11VaAprt R ,{a tcaci � Load Sze:p..yds,Aons1= LOAD 4. Signature of Transaorter Reoresemawe: Recerrtnc =a. Rem my Rotary Storage Representative: , Data of Shipment: Time of Shipment ; Date of Feceoi: Time of Re carol: /_ /_ (cucie ane)amfcm �TrLckfrracor Registration: Tiaeer Regrianton(if any): i (olive one)amlpm ! , Load Size f cu vds.Aons): LOAD & Signature of Transporter R.epresenurue. Receiving==Jilyfremporary Storage Reoresentawe: i I Date at Shipment Tme of Sivameni: ; Oce of Repe:pL Time of Receict: (circle one)asNMt TnrcWTraoaor Regsaaepn: Trailer Registration tit airy): `� (circle one)amlpm , Load Size(cu.yds.Aons): LOAD Co.- Signature of Transporter Representawe- Receiving=ac,atyfremporary Storage Representative: l , Date at Shipment rime of Shipment: ' � Date of Receipt: Time at Receipt: (cane cne)amipm 'ruckffractor Registration: Trader Registration(a any): (Circle we)amipm , Load Sue(cu.vcsltonsk LOAD Z: Signature at 7ramialwer Rearesentairw Receiving-aciatyfTemporary,Storage Reoreseniauve. Date of Shipment: Time of Shipment: Data of Rece+pt: Time of Receipt! (Circle one)amfRm Truciintactpr Registration: Trailer Regrsiratlon(d any): i (cane one)amJPm Load Size(cu vasilons): LOU SHEET VOLUME 1HFORMATfON: Total Votume Trus Page tca.yds.,to s): C {}n /� l Total Carried Forward icu N as.itons)- Total Carried Forward and T)vs Page(cn =,tons): eviseo 1411143 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-0129 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BILL OF LADING tnurstaant to 310 CUR 40.60301 LOG SHEETOF (�-1 24051 1. LOAD INFORMATION: LO t: issue Transpaner R S epresentaty : Recerv' . 10 (Y weary Storage Reo esentalrve I l/GcP k Date of Shipment: ' - _ // Time at Shipment: � pate c! -e_oipt � Time of Recede // . /�/-42-.7 C�.:! 7M (circ,eonesarrWm L' . / �/` / /O7- : SV i Truck/riaeto stranon: Trailer Registration (it any): J 60 (1' (cucieone)aCrr�.Vpm ✓� ��(� 1 ; Load S+ze f_a.yds2ansf: aZ9i,�. J LOAD 2 Signature of Tranwoner Riiwesentauve: Recsry - =3cniiry/Temporary Storage Representative: iDate of Shipment: Time of Stapnnent: Dale of =e_erpt: Time of Receipt: /_ /" (arUe one(aMom TrucklTramor Registration. ?ratter Registration(it any): (c:rcfe one)amrpm ` Load Stz=_!c» ydsJtons): LOAD 3: Signature of Transponer Representative. Recarwn- ==crtrrylTemporary Storage Representative r i Date of Shipment: Time of Shipment: Date of =-ceioc Time of Receipt; (circle one}amom TrucWfraptor Registration! fares Registration(if any): i (circle one(amrpm i Load Sze:a».yosllons): LOAD 4: Signature of Transoater Representattve: ; Reconnric =aa:trty/Tempoary Storage Representatwe: + 14 1 + Date of Shipment Tune ci Shiomenr ; Date of,==ca.ai: Time of Receipt: (circle ane)amh'xn Truck[Tractor Registra»on: T rarer Registration(it any): i (circle one)am/pm i Load Size'c:: vds.hons): LOAD 5: Signature of Trarspcter Representauve: Receiving=ac,kr/frernporary Storage Representative: r r Date of Shipment Tone ai Stuoment: Date of Rece:or: Time of Rece,ct: _ /_ /_ : (cucie tine)artvCxtt TruckJTractor Registration: - Ttarter Registration(it any): (circle one)atnlpm r Load Size(cu.yds.Rans): LOAD 6: Signatua of Transponer Representative: Recewi ng acuiry(Temocrary Storage Represeuauve: i + Date of Shipment ' Time of Smpment: + Date a)Recti+ct: Time of Receipt: , (circle one)artVpm TrucklTrac or Registration: Trailer Registration(J any): r (cucie one)amlom � Load Size fcu.yds.,tonsy, LOAD 7: Signature of Transporter Representative + Recar g=aciaiy7Temparary Storage Reoresemaove: I' r r ?ate of Shrpmem: Time of Shioment + Date of RecgW: Tme of Recepr. I i icucie one)andpm Truclu7n czar Registration: Traver Registration(4 anvy ' (=c:e one)amrpm . Load Size 4 cu rdsnons): i LOG SHEET VOLUME INFORMATION: Total Volume This rage(c i.vos,4ons): i Total Carried Rorwad(c::v:.s.nonsi TtAar Carved Porwartl and ilus Pagelcn yos;tons): i =.evtseo IW193 -- Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-0125 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BILL OF LADING (vonaant to a10 CUR 40.0WO) 13 = jf µ LOG SHEET OF 3u- 24051 i. LOAD INFORMATION: LOAD Signature o(Transponer Represemauve: _ ' ReceW,/�' - aci4 /Tem jJj��)/} ry gdrarY Storage Reoresentatrve ../.e)4"J.-Z'.�3'i�``Y'4/f''i' „-�/�r1�r/✓�?" � 1/ 1// Date 1 . of Shipmem: Time cf Shipment: - i / t i mDale GT -oCt•:Dr ime at Recetp:C Tr (entre Wei aran i 3 ? i Tru,dWTrac:or R suaaon: Trai,t R �7 e91 pP��.,eg+suatwn {ii any;: 36,;,_. �� f� (cvcte o�n+e)amp C4/?. ; load Sze(:u.ydsAwst: �� •qt^ LOAD 2 Signature of Transorwar Representative, ' Aecervii-: =ac,ii /Tem � _ N porary Storage Representative: , Date of Shipment: Time of Shmment: ' Date 01 =e:a+pt: Time c;Aeca+ + p` /— /— (crde one!amiom Truck(Tramor Registration ira ter Registration(if any): (c:rcle Cie)am;qm ' , Load Sue!C. ydsJcons): � LOAD 3: Signature of Transponer Representative. Recervr^_ =-iWiTemporary Storage Represema,we , , Cate at Shipment: Time of Shipment: Date C4 =ece:pc Time of ReCe+pt' (crc:e;re)am/pm Truck/Ractor Regmtraticn: Trane:Registration(if any): tcirdte one)amrpni i load Size!C..ydshons): LOAD 4: Signature of Transporter Reoresentatrre: ; Receiving =a:iimy(Temporary Storage Representative: , Pate of Shipment Time of Sh,oment: Date of rece.or Time of Receipt (rxc:e:rte)amrom TrucwTracux Registration: - Trai,e!Registration(if any): i (aide erre)am/pm + load Size iC:: vds.Aws): LOAD 5: Stgnauxe of Transponer Representative: Recemn "acli rT i g- ty empaary.,forage Representative: i Date of Shipment Time of Shioment: ; Date of Receipt Time of Receipt: (drefeone)atn+pm TrucktTraaor Registration: Trader Regissirawn(if any): i (circle one)amlom , Load Size(cu.yds.Rdns): LOAD 6: Signature of Transporter Reoresematrve: i Receiving=acmrytremporary Storage Representative: i Date of Shipment Time of Shipment: ' f i Date of fleceict: Time ci Rece+gr. rucicfTtactor Registration: Tracer Regmration fit any): ;Crete ane)amtpm Load Size fcu.vcs.nons)w LOAD 72 Signature of Transporter Representative: ,Pecasnng=adntyrTemporary Storage Representative: Date of Shipment: Time of Shiomtem: Date of Receipt. Time of Receipt: (Ctrcie one)anYpm TrwcklTructor Registration: Tra ier Registration(d any): ' (GTde One)amiDm , � Load.Size(cu ccsApns): LOG SHEET VOLUME INFORMATION: Total Volttme This Page ica.tics.;lor>51: ! �. Pr`"� /�S Tctat Carried Forward(G::.�-s.;tons) V _ T=1 Carried Forward and This Page(cc ,,cs.tons): eased 19/1193 FICl/E: F11`401JIF-,V FiEP.OFRT - i1t#t±:' k4 to 11/0,-s/04 /08/04- �133:08�pm Pingrenate Indnabrie i,!_ Region Page __===_=-------- -- - - SORT BY: CUSTOMER LDCATION; 311 STOUGHTON TO 311 STOUGHTON CUSTOMER: 999998 CASH SLS/STOUGHTON TO 999998 CASH SLS/STOUGHTON ORDER: 31113 SOIL/SALEM-WEBS ST TO 3111" SOIL/SALEM-WEBB ST TICKET LOCN DATE TIME IN CUSTOMER. ORDER PRODUCT HAULER TRUCK ST BIN DISP OTY - ------- -------- -- ----- -- --- ---- ------ 3603174 311 11/08 10:12 9"4998 CASH '13/5 SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 52 0 31.48 TON 3603175 311 11108 10:14 993998 CASH SLS/S SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 57 0 29.36 TON :613265 311 11/08 1"":42 9511498 CASH SL31S SOILISALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 52 0 X00 7UN 33603266 311 11/08 13:433 9=4998 CASH S 8!S SOILISALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 52 0 33.40 TON 3603268 311 11108 13:45 +398 CASH SL5/5 SOIL/SALEM RECY SOIL CENTRE T 57 0 2'5.82 TON CASH SLS/STOUGHTON TOTALS y TICKETS 120.06 TON -------- ------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- lEPORT TOTALS L/ �`iICKETS 1221.06 TON i • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC-i'126 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup e�x n.wq K,.nee. BiLL OF LADING (pumusnt to 310 CUR 40.OWO) LOG SHEET OF 33 2405^� 1. LOAD INFORMATiON• LOAD It Signature ransp epresentative: '. Aec "acdnyrTemporary Storage Representatrve. j Date of Shipment Time of Shipment: , Tri -ezeipt: Time of Rece:; i at � i/ /r /� ( _„_ (cicieone)anvpm _(,[. / / C/Zl � • ;-' { Truck/Tractor Registration: Trailer Registration (if any): ' b�• " (circle ohne)arapm /`,�A 'T74a 5 7' R ,` Load Size(-u.yds.lions): tq1=J� LOAD 2��Sii ASit Transporter Representative: R ;acdiry/Temporary Storage Reiuesentatrve: Date of Sbrent: Time o1 Stupment: Date of =e vol: Time of Rece,p: (curie one).mipm ^ /_ /_ _ TruckRractor Registration Trailer Rertstrati (ii airy}; i 4 vete one)am A-/, Load Siztl(c, yds,ltons}: LOAD 3: Signature of Transponer Representative: Recervir.c=aalityrTempdrary Storage Represent.iwe i Oahe of Shipment: Time of Shipment: Date of Pace:pt. Time of Receipt tcucle we :nvgn TruGVTractor Registration: Rader P+:;!stration(it any): tarcte one)ami:ai Load Size!:._.ydsdons): LOAD 4: Signature of Transponer Representative: Recai c :aalityrfemporary Storage Repiesentauve: �I i Date of Shipment Time at Shipment ; Date of Re_e.of: Time of Receipt (circle one; TiucWTractor Regisrrat*n- Tra,ier Re,. :trauon(it any): i (circle one)am/pm , ' Load Size tcu yds.flons): LOAD rx Signature of Transporter Representative: Receiving Facilayrremporary Storage Representai e: i Oahe of Shipment Time of Shipment: Date of Receot: Time of Receiot (circle one)c:Npm - TfucW Tracuu Registration: Trailer Re ;stration(if any): (circle one)am/pin i , Load Size(cu,yds-Aons): LOAD 6: Signature of Transporter Representative: i Receiving Facd,tyfTempofary Storage Representali:e: i Oahe of Shipment: Time of Shipment: i Date of Aecelm Time of Receipt: (circle one)ainipm TruckiTractor Registration: Trailer Registration(it any): (circle one)amipm Load Size(cu.vds.1tons):, LOAD 7: Signature of Transporter Representative: Recervwg Facihtyriemporary Storage Representative: Date of Shipment: Time of Shipment: Date of Receipt: Time G Receipt: /_ /. (cuUeoneian'.tcm Truck/Tracior Registration: - Trader Regtsiration CO any): (Circle one)amtom Load Size(cu v0s./tons): J. LOG SHEET VOLUME INFORMATION: Total Volume This Page(cu.yds;tons): I Total Carried Forward(cy.gcsJtons) C � r� Taal Carried Forward and This Page(c; =iev,sed tOft7g3 Massachusetts Department of Environmentai Protection BWSC-012B Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BILL OF LADING (yunaavntIle,310CUR 40_003O) 371-724051 . LOG SHEET OF L LOAD INFORM TION: LOAD 1e 5gr�6 gTlarsp R�e9t3We: ReceN /=aubty(TemoorayStorageRepresentatrve I Date of Stu�p/m/e,Lnt: / i me Shion>enb D/a//e c! ' aoc: Time of Receipt: lGrGea la�f,Pm �L.. /- /f,2 i TiucKractor Registration: Traits (circle one)amlpmt f i Loa r;S,z_ Ll [-a, yd tions): LOAD i�g,pt Tr• rt ter Reorrsentawe. Rec.- i!`j- Gfity/Temporaty Storage Representative: IaOa of Stj��%/ tui,ryry(;� ne of S Da: - =:atot Time of Receipt III{ /_A /St� � (cycle one)arrrlom �TruduTractor Registration Trailer(RegisIpelon^' (if any): S, ;.2 /'/' (circle me)'a`m�cppry ' l�r r"' , _1'a .f lu I& ' ZLac.: YGtlsb./tons}: 33 (o LOAD 3: Signature of Transporter. Reow%estawe. Reu: --rhrylTemporary Storage Representa:we Date of Shipment•. time of Shrpmer ; Da:. _e:a: Time of Receipt: (circle one)anvorn _ TrucYjTractor Registration: inner Registration(ii any): ; tc:ro;e one)am/pr. f Load Size!c..ypshons): ij LOAD 4: Signature o1 Transporter Reprr �zntauve: ; Recervmc 2aciMyRemporary Storage Representative: Date of Stapment vie of Sh,pmer. Date of Pezz ct: Time of Receipt: (circle crio ami m /— /— Tnr Aaraaor Reg,suation: Tracer Registration(it any): (circle one)anvpm , Load Size:= vols-!tons): LOAD 5a Signature of Transporter Repre.critauvel ; ReceivingaG1 g " - y(Tempwary Storage Represemawe: Date of Shipment Time of Stuomem.` Date of Receipt: ':ime of Receipt: (circle one)arril '— TnxfvTraaor Registration: Tratler Regatmw�on(it airy): (circle one)am/om Load Size(cu.ydsdlons): LOAD St Signature of Transporter Repre. .awe: Recemng�aairtyiTemperary Storage Repro.-=native: r , Date of Shipment- Tvne of Stupmeric , Date of Recetet: Tune of Re:-.,)i: — {c=e one)amfcrt - TrurcfelTraaorRegistration: Trails arty): ' (circle one)amipm � '_Oatl Size{Cu.yaS.ROns)r j i LOAD Z: Signature of Transponer Re;resentawe: N Recemng FaGaty/Temporary Storage Representaww Date of Stvpment: Time of Shipment: ' Date of Recf-ol: T me of Receipt: (alae one)ar+utxa TruchiTractor Registration:` Trans Regrstraf-)n(if any): ' (Gree one)amiom r Load Size tc_ .psnonsi: I LOG SHEET VOLUME INFORMATION: Total Volume Ttus Page i::- .=Mins): i Total Carved Forward C. .s.;tonsy Total Canted Forward and Ttus Page(, slonsl'. �.evised 10(1193 -- - � APPENDIX S-1 e ¢5 F e . in � rw.l tA:^l , xi I E"' W Q A ° N• O r � �. ,fit � y17'� •�' Q/� f � � i �� $'" F x • • i '� � � �' � ". �1,{ � � yam. & s� i{ r.• fv �'��a �� • .i �� +.. � _sF ..�� kJ III n { � � � ,' � � ,4�; � r., lf•.f fit-"' 17 tA It f 3 R "..GR.,a. {y t rrfj, ,�{ • " F 7ii5 t Vit" dJ% '}° � .s1.1�C "'�Y � u i, �� ti J� • � e c . 99 J,�F s i i � U�� t�� Imo• � � �� E �111��, , r I : f J^ -Y '�- y-+. �C3fit-w..� .�� +p"��s-�,t:`t"t .�.�,` -•'�j'ri ;tT < F ' .1, x �� •'u � ."'�2iy,c "f' r^'2rY� t� r4. � .��y°�_. �ti}!G 1 �fi ti ♦ y<��l}kgs' y `:Y`h� y.... V �- a� t ® Ma ms�ss§ s gqggac 8 s a ` "T` •; gEq' 3 �g� a-3s� gpx � §§ gg s e�e_gg99sa _e ads �+� F + f et"s @3„"t °' ''�.. T"�#i*T %''amu u -yz•.r 1. f r ,u , r x � y F ! r f «. � �tl f I ryrt eg � w r y�� y r,, ,E�" '{�. �»1 y. r � � .�� i: sAj may. �«` o'A' �� -�:• "R� r (�� ,�k�t"''a- sir a�� fr �' e y �a'iY d#; _ �• SAY 2,S Y 1 y'.�#� �i R Q RS ��3• Y _*f" ON Ke r WT'C M " »7,. . SAY �, g MA SALE' ' � �iia ^�. �Y ry�� i � s it � /y✓� yyyn 1 R � �v. � ` ��•{.. �k�s�"�h � .�� V W ` �� ;� �a 7`��#'- �r. �':`�v��• fW1 ��1! �� .' y �7�Y� � .� Yy 4)�ti §u'Fa. lT� � `1 !r� g �^! (it �i•S � ISI �ne"'�' ° i Yr• n +,' t ig fiafiSr�� ¢,� � t' l" �� A T Yri 4�( .}�` r �•?, + {' 1�� '� r Id ay, �.Jt Y,�jJr,p ,F �n��,ra. AiCL +` WY ¢` • e a �-w.h 1 tYpli h .x1.� T i�' b ,F •�"}d a .rte� � trJldfl?I •� � �° " ; i`• r�ryy j a 3 r'J + i } i 4 DEPTH Settling Tank LOCATION Settling Tank (Feet) Day#1 Day#1 • HNu HNu 0 Street Side 0 Tar - Hosue East 0 North Sidewall Sidewall 1 Concrete Rubble 2.4 Dark Silt 0 2 Brown Silt 3.7 Minor White Ash 0 3 1 4 Dark Silt .5 4 Bottom Wood Settling 6.6 5.1 Tank Wood & Concrete 3 Tan Red Sand 5 6 Black Silt 5 Grey Sand 3 With Tan Veins 7-- Grey Sand/Silt 2 0 8-- Grey Silt 0 Dry to 10' 0 9 MW to 13' 10 • SOIL LOGS 9 WEBB STREET DEPTH Settling Tank LOCATION Settling Tank (Feet) Day#1 Day#1 • HNu HNu . 0 Cousins Street 0 South End Sidewall 0 West Sidewall Rubble& Brick Rubble & Weed 1 0 0 2 Tan Sand 1 .5 Tan Medium Sand 0 3 t 1 .8 0 4 Grey/Brown Silt 15 1 5 6" Steel Pipe (Sewer) 5 0 6 Grey Medium Sand 8 1 7-- 6 8 6 9-- 10__ • SOIL LOGS 9 WEBB STREET DEPTH Tank Grave LOCATION Tank Grave (Feet) Day#2 Day#2 • HNu HNu OT Club Driveway, South 0 Cousins Street, West 0 Sidewall - Loam Sidewall - Loam Grass ' 1 Brick & Tan Sand O 1 .5 2 Edge of Brown Sand/Loam 4 Red an Sand 1 .9 Grave 3 Red Tan Sand & Silt 3.5 0 4 6 Tan Sand 2.4 8.0 6 7 8.5 Grey Veins 4.0 8-- Grey SE nd/Silt 10 9 Grey Clay @ 12' Grey Clay @ 12' 10 MW to 14' • SOIL LOGS 9 WEBB STREET DEPTH Tank Grave LOCATION Tank Grave (Feet) Day#2 Day#2 HNu HNu • 0 House Sidewall, East 2.5 Webb St., North Sidewall 0 Brick & Concrete Rubble & Brick Rubble 1 4 2 3.2 3 Brown Loam 2 Floor Concrete 0 (former boiler room) 4 Tan/Red Sand 4.4 5 Black Silt Layer 2 6 Tan Sand 6.2 Tan Sand 1 7-- Grey Silt 8 Grey Silt 9 10 Grey Clay @ 11' Grey Clay @ 11' • SOIL LOGS 9 WEBB STREET COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS One Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 - - Please print or type. (Form designed for use on elite(12-pitch)typewriter) UNIFORM HAZARDOUS. 1..Generator's US EPA ID No Manifest DoI cument No. 2.Page 1 . Information in-the shaded areas WASTE`MANIFEST: of snot required by Federal law. 3 Generator's Name and Mailing Address StafeWan mCfi �! lgki r OrA n + da M V � � � t s B State Gen,(D fit°-Lh4:F:4`•T3 T.`iT y , ' �' w Am" "54 h 5�5�� n �m''�-�.r��' D.., r + - a 4.Generator's Phone(p.jq >4 F - ( $;i d' s` 6.1i- ` e.a,.-S yk`.*. p_ �, 5 Transporter l Company Name 6 US EPA ID NumberC Stata'{[ans.aD yam`m' ,100 p,}C /,r 4\s` t t. t ,* a > ,. .e ant , " m _ 9, ." d, 7.Transporter 2 Company Name -S. EPA ID Number - rII TransporieC.Phone(°r' 7 z '� y CVS E State Trans'10 t ru as c mss_ g ` p9 9.Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10.US EPA ID Number s ,t [. d ,,I= ,."3 ,do, O cr)r =cF ! ES OF, ,te.,1t ;aa»_. 'Tran'sportacsahnn�(�r' ➢ do zl{i:Y3I�, ...,F,t - - :G�Statd Facillrys ID a'n" at4CTREOUIRED .,�,,y i ha.,,'�'^r-�i{a �.. `i;Ci tf� �2r1-4.t?(j g,c �. '; h ,� _ iq 1 R _H Faciilty�s'Ph9ne( `t ,, ` R ,. dl".�i ; I 'u' 00 11.US COT Description(Including Proper Sh,ppmg Name,Hazard Class and ID Number) 12 Nom"ef5 Tyra rural 13.a -13 m. I r Jn� wtisie No� -. -� +' ":� U a 1s T x - t V 6 [r) D p `a* ` , n a G d.1IlY T lis r N E b. i y CE N N E C R u;.q ' � 1<hI N O A ,'., in,€, .r CO Z OTITT R ir=r" RZ1 =t Iia an D � ! 1 N d. >1 off, r ir co co 9a r I 4) J.Addrtonal Descriptions for Materials Usted Above include h sroaFstate and hazard code -xt .�, m p [ ( p y )n 1 .-N }f Handling Codes for Wastas Listed,Above,,, T t It Z- ux>~ :+; 4P- Iso ' s t.-c '14— -€° ix c ri 'sr #,x ,rY. 'w�`k};+ �+�a .. 'r` `n ' - e6`rn .d€ sa - _ it xa1 y S'`-r w - pq `t [a N :l ' '�t3 .. ,� a .""^n, .. a.,yj§=` ,„,, a -+ _mxv..3, x a d `. 9k,e ',ki,u c C` ry', d x» } `� .3'2 • n `g vt 'kgs S¥kr ;Y >k4 e -t + t ) .( -r2 daax� l.sa..9 `,h„ ge Tui`3" �.K+ y r v Lt a x 1'� - ¢' . 'S, „a ;ryft Q b l . h{t h4 _'', t1Y �r i'3 'h;Pt= , ��-w, t �4 -c a � v , 5 N ur«e = _,. .=.-e�x d `h -t P {«c:- F it vt e*-. �a i 15.Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information O T U N 16:GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION:I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name and are classified, O) packed,marked,and labeled,and sib in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable international and national government regulations. O If I am a large quantity generator,I certify that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically E practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment,storage,or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human C health and the environment; OR, if I am all quantity generator,I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and select the'best waste management N me d that is available to me and that I an fiord. a O € - 9 � _ ,a t� i, Data tU riot /Typed Name ignature -V t {t M Da`7, Year y UE 17.Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date O A PrintedlTyp4naT Signature 1 X N tr }f'�' +� ,(,B `�y�t-.f Month Day Year F7°� I � LJ ba.`�"' � ,Y� 4if q 18.Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Mat ials " - Date EPrinteol7yped Name Signatifr ' Month Day Year F19.Discrepancy Indication Space A C 20.Facility Owner or Operator:Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest ekcept as noted in iteml9 L 33 Data T Printec/Typed Name n Signaturl Marsh Day - Year. Form Aporoved OMB No.2050-0039. v 7 EPA Form 3700-22(Rev.9-96)Previous editions are obsolete. COPi FACILITY MAILS TO GENERATOR t Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection y� Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC104 t Release Tracking Number • ' RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RA®) STATEMENT g Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)&40.1056 (Subpart J) ® 24051 A. SITE LOCATION: 1. Site Name/Location Aid: Richard Leather Co. 2. Street Address: 9 Webb Street 3. Citylrown: Salem, MA 4. ZIP Code: 01970-0000 5. Check here if a Tier Classification Submittal has been provided to DEP for this disposal site. ❑ a. Tier 1A n b. Tier 1 B ❑ c. Tier 1 C © d. Tier 2 6. If a Tier I Permit has been issued,provide Permit Number: B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO: (check all that apply) 1. List Submittal Date of RAO Statement(if previously submitted): mm/dd/yyyy 2. Submit a Response Action Outcome(RAO)Statement Fla. Check here if this RAO Statement covers additional Release Tracking Numbers (RTNs). RTNs that have been previously linked to a Primary Tier Classified RTN do not need to be listed here. b. Provide additional Release Tracking Number(s) ❑ ❑ covered by this RAO Statement. 3. Submit a Revised Response Action Outcome Statement a. Check here if this Revised RAO Statement covers additional Release Tracking Numbers(RTNs),not listed on the ❑ RAO Statement or previously submitted Revised RAO Statements. RTNs that have been previously linked to a Primary Tier Classified RTN do not need to be listed here. b. Provide additional Release Tracking Number(s) ❑ _ ❑ _ covered by this RAO Statement. 4. Submit a Response Action Outcome Partial(RAO-P)Statement Check above box, if any Response Actions remain to be taken to address conditions associated with this disposal site having the Primary RTN listed in the header section of this transmittal form. This RAO Statement will record only an RAO-Partial Statement for that RTN. A final RAO Statement will need to be submitted that references all RAO-Partial Statements and,if applicable,covers any remaining conditions not covered by the RAO-Partial Statements. ❑ 5. Submit an optional Phase I Completion Statement supporting an RAO Statement 6. Submit a Periodic Review Opinion evaluating the status of a Temporary Solution for a Class C RAO Statement (Section E is optional) ❑ 7. Submit a Retraction of a previously submitted Response Action Outcome Statement(Sections D&E are not required) (All sections of this transmittal form must be filled out unless otherwise noted above) • Revised:06/27/2003 Page 1 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Ei Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC104 S2ESPOIVSE ACTT®ACTION �UTCOUTCOME (RAO) STATEMENTENT Release Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)&40.1056(Subpart J) 24051 C. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS: (check all that apply,for volumes list cumulative amounts) ❑ 1. Assessment and/or Monitoring Only ❑ 2. Temporary Covers or Caps ❑ 3. Deployment of Absorbent or Containment Materials ❑ 4. Temporary Water Supplies ❑ 5. Structure Venting System ❑ 6. Temporary Evacuation or Relocation of Residents ❑ 7. Product or NAPL Recovery ❑ 8. Fencing and Sign Posting ❑ 9. Groundwater Treatment Systems ❑ 10. Soil Vapor Extraction ❑ 11. Bioremediation ❑ 12, AirSparging © 13. Removal of Contaminated Soils ❑y/ a. Re-use,Recycling or Treatment ❑ i.On Site Estimated volume in cubic yards 0 ii.Off Site Estimated volume in cubic yards 270 Tons iia.Facility Name: Aggregate Industries Town: Stoughton state: MA iib. Facility Name: Town: State: iii. Describe: • ❑ b. Landfill ❑ i.Cover Estimated volume in cubic yards Facility Name: Town: State: ❑ ii.Disposal Estimated volume in cubic yards Facility Name: Town: State: ❑ 14. Removal of Drums,Tanks or Containers: a. Describe Quantity and Amount: b. Facility Name: Town: State: c. Facility Name: Town: State: • Revised:06/27/2003 Page 2 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC104 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RAO) STATEMENT Release Tracking Number f • Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)&40.1056(Subpart J) E - 24051 C. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS(cont.): (check all that apply,for volumes list cumulative amounts) ❑ 15. Removal of Other Contaminated Media: a.Specify Type and Volume: b. Facility Name: Town: State: c. Facility Name: Town: State: ❑ 16. Other Response Actions: Describe: ❑ 17. Use of Innovative Technologies: Describe: D. RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME CLASS: Specify the Class of Response Action Outcome that applies to the disposal site,or site of the Threat of Release. Select ONLYone Class. ❑ 1. Class A-1 RAO: Specify one of the following: ❑ a. Contamination has been reduced to background levels. ❑ b. A Threat of Release has been eliminated. FVi 2. Class A-2 RAO: You MUST provide justification that reducing contamination to or approaching background levels is infeasible. ❑ 3. Class A-3 RAO: You MUST provide an implemented Activity and Use Limitation(AUL)and justification that reducing contamination to or approaching background levels is infeasible. t 4. Class A-4 RAO: You MUST provide an implemented AUL, justification that reducing contamination to or approaching ❑ background levels is infeasible,and justification that reducing contamination to less than Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) 15 feet below ground surface or below an engineered barrier is infeasible. If the permanent solution relies upon an engineered barrier, you must also provide a Phase III report justifying the selection of the engineered barrier. • Revised:06/27/2003 _ Page 3 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmentai Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC904 a € sem. • izESPONSE,�cri®s� arc®ME (RAO) STATEMENT Release Tracking Number ❑( Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)&40.1056(SubpartJ) 3 24051 D. RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME CLASS(cont): 5. Class B-1 RAO: Specify one of the following: a. Contamination is consistent with background levels ❑ b. Contamination is NOT consistent with background levels. 6. Class B-2 RAO: You MUST provide an implemented AUL. 7. Class B-3 RAO: You MUST provide an implemented AUL and justification that reducing contamination to less than Upper Concentration Limits(UCLs)15 feet below ground surface is infeasable. 8. Class C RAO:Specify one: a. Monitoring ❑ b. Passive Operation and Maintenance c. Active Operation and Maintenance(defined at 310 CMR 40.0006) E. RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME INFORMATION: 1. Specify the Risk Characterization Method(s)used to achieve the RAO described above: a. Method 1 ❑ b.Method 2 ❑ c.Method 3 d. Method Not Applicable-Contamination reduced to or consistent with background,orThreat of Release abated 2. Specify all Soil and Groundwater Categories. More than one Soil Category and more than one Groundwater Category may apply at a Site. Be sure to check off all APPLICABLE categories. a.Soil Category(ies)Applicable: F1 1. S-1/GW-1 7 iv.S-2/GW-1 vii.S-3/GW-1 V ii. S-1/GW-2 7 v.S-2/GW-2 ❑ viii.S-3/GW-2 0 iii. S-1/GW-3 ❑ A. S-2/GW-3 ❑ ix. S-31GW-3 b. Groundwater Category(ies)Impacted: 1. GWA ❑✓ ii. GW-2 V iii.GW-3 F-] iv.No Groundwater Impacted 3. Specify remediation conducted. ® a. Check here if soil remediation was conducted. El b. Check here if groundwater remediation was conducted. 4. Estimate the number of acres this RAO Statement applies to: 0.5 • Revised: 06/27/2003 Page 4 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BWSC1o4 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup LIN RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME(RAO)STATEMENT Release Tracking Number • Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)540.1058(Subpart J) I24051 F. LSP SIGNAnM AND STAMP: 1 attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personalty examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of(i)the standard of care In 309 CMR 4.02(1),#1)the applicable provislonsof 309 CMR 4.02(2)and(3),and 309 CMR4.03(2),and (iii)the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3),to the best of my knowledge,information and belief, > if Section A indicates that either an RAO Statement,Phase I Compledon Statement andior Perloalk ReykilrOpinlon Is being provided,the response actlon(s)that is(are)the subject of this submittal(1)has(have)been developed and Implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,Q1)is(are)appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s)as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L.c.21E and 310 CMR 40.0000,and(111)compfy(les)with the identified provisions of all orders,permits,and approvals Identified in this submittal. I am aware that significant penalties may result,including,but not limited to,possible fines and imprisonment,if i submit Information which I know to be false,inaccurate or materially incomplete. 1. LSP#: 7639 ___ 2. First Name: David _ 3. Last Name: Bramley 4. Telephone: (860) 953-2700 S. 3046 s. FAX, 7. Signature: �'//L ooS e. Date: 9.LSP Stamp: mmlddlyyyy . F c i... 1� 3tlElEY V e� ,.,h Nb. col 7639 4'G�i?y '/STEP oa°�_ e G. PIMON MAMS SUBMfrTM- 1. Check all thatc- Change In the person aPpb ❑ a.change In contact name ( .� b.change or address ❑ undertaking response actions 2. Name of organization: Close Cousins Reslty Trust 3. Contact first Name: David 4.Last Name: Walsh s. street 71 Lafayette Street 5.Tide: Trustee 7. Chyrrown: Salem s. State: MA 9. ZIP Cede: 01970-0000 10. Telephone: (978) 745-1746 P 11.Ext: ..",_., . .._....._. 12. FAX: __�........^ . Revised:6127/2003 Page 5 of 7 LlMassachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC104 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RAO) STATEMENTRelease Tracking Number Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)&40.1056(Subpart J) - 24051 H. RELATIONSHIP TO RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEASE OF PERSON MAKING SUBMRAL: 1. RP or PRP ❑ a. Owner ❑ b. Operator ❑ c. Generator ❑ d. Transporter ❑ e. Other RP or PRP Specify: ❑ 2. Fiduciary,Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status(as defined by M.G.L.c.21 E,s.2) ❑ 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way(as defined by M.G.L.c.21E,s.50)) ❑ 4. Any Other Person Making Submittal Specify Relationship: I.REQUIRED ATTACHMENT AND SUBMITTALS: 1. Check here if the Response Action(s)on which this opinion is based,if any, are(were)subject to any order(s), permit(s) ❑ and/or approval(s)issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked,you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable provisions thereof, ❑ 2. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the submittal of an RAO Statement that relies on the public way/rail right-of-way exemption from the requirements of an AUL. 3. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the submittal of a RAO Statement with instructions on how to obtain a full copy of the report. 4. Check here to certify that documentation is attached specifying the location of the Site,or the location and boundaries of the Disposal Site subject to this RAO Statement. If submitting an RAO Statement for a PORTION of a Disposal Site, you must document the location and boundaries for both the portion subject to this submittal and,to the extent defined,the entire Disposal Site. 5. Check here if required to submit one or more AULs. You must submit an AUL Transmittal Form (BWSC113)and a ❑ copy of each implemented AUL related to this RAO Statement. Specify the type of AUL(s)below: (required for Class A-3,A-4,B-2,B-3 RAO Statements) ❑ a. Notice of Activity and Use Limitation b. Number of Notices submitted: ❑ c. Grant of Environmental Restriction d. Number of Grants submitted: ❑ 6. If an RAO Compliance Fee is required for any of the RTNs listed on this transmittal form,check hereto certify that an RAO Compliance Fee was submitted to DEP, P.O.Box 4062,Boston,MA 02211. ❑ 7. Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is incorrect,e.g.Site Address/Location Aid. Send corrections to the DEP Regional Office. 8. Check hereto certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts,data,and other information is attached. Revised:06/27/2003 - _ Page 6 of 7 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup BWSC104 RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME(RAO) STATEMENT Releasease Tracking Number • Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0580(Subpart E)&40.1056(Subpart J) J �IJ - I_ 2405 J. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON MWING SUBMITTAL: 1 I David Walsh ,attest under the pains and penalties of perjury(i)that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal,including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form,(ii)that,based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information,the material information contained in this submittal is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate and complete,and(iii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made am/is aware that there are significant penalties,including,but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment,for willfully submitting false,inaccurate,or incomplete information. 2 By: on, AI Trustee Y 3. Title: Signature 4. For. David Walsh 5. Date: (Name of person or entity recorded in Section G) mm/dd/yyyy [j 6. Check here ifthe address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section G. 7. Street: 8. City/Town: 9. State: 10. ZIP Code: 11. Telephone: 12.Ext: 13. FAX • YOU MUST LEGIBLY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM,YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE Date Stamp(DEP USE ONLY:) Revised:06/27/2003 Page 7 of 7 • New England ChronnaChem, Inc. MA DEP VPH Analytical Report SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information Matrix r%t1N": ❑ Aqueous O Soil ❑Sediment ❑Other: I Project# Remainin Soils Containers v © Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: Web St Salem Da 1 Aqueous(acid preserved) ❑ N/A ❑pH <2 ❑ pH >2 Comment: Sample'. ",Aqueous(TSP preserved) D N/A ❑ pH < 11 ❑ pH > 11 Comment: ml McOH Pres rvative Soil or 13 N/A ❑ Samples NOT preserved in McOH or air-tight containers O 1:1+25% Sediment ® Samples received in McOH ® Covering soil/sediment ❑ Not covering soil/sediment ❑ Other Temperature'. 0 Received on ice O Received at 4"C ±2°C ❑ Other: °C Sidewalls - VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: East: South West Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 03-1 1 Client ID 40901,8 s 9oj019= 409020= Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP VPH : "' Lab1D: 'f'409128S ` ~409129 Tf iA09130 `"�.; .Date Collected: ',`"09!07/04 , 09!07/04 ===,i, .t± o9/,071041 VPH Surrogate Standards: WKNi 'Date Received: 09Ti4/04, =_"'09/1ai0a tj09/14/04 ' MS: BFB RIACMA,IAC' Date Preserved.1 X09%07/04 W� x 3*,'07%04#x=, MS: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (1,4-DCB-d4) teAnalyzed x:09116/04 f091f6104_ p9/18/040; ` ftv 4Dilution.Factor i 1:0.7 1„ ., Ar` 1 0 MM-00 Moisture! Range/[aYget`Ariatyte= ! _ v%t, ,Elut:Rahga' RL'(m9/Kg)e;`s Units ;., s ±t _1=0 R UnadjustedCS=C�Ahphatics l• y N/A 50 mg/Kg ND ND ND ,Urladfusted C9 C(ZAllphaticsl,T N/A 500 mg/Kg 502 ND ND Benzenes r "` T 1 C5-C8Arph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND Eth Ibenzene0" � c9-C12Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND Methyl-tert-butyl ether3, C5-C8Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND Naphthalene ° fix,_ _ ,TMA,150 i' N/A 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND Toluene Ma„1RAW � �� C5-C8Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND rr"8=p" lenes, � � C9-C12Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND o-Xylene C9-C12Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND C5 Cg AliphatlaHydrocarbons= N/A 50T1' 'm /K ND ND ND Ca C12`Altphatic Hytlrocarbans N/Arm aSOQ m9/Kgr 502 ND ND C9 C o-Aromatic Hydrocarbons N/A ='; 0"M VE-mg/Kgs; ND ND ND BFBaSurrogate%R6coveryai 74% 930, 76% 1,4-DCB=d4SGrrogat@%;Recovery"`. ;, 123% 111% 110% Surrogate•Accepta(1Ce Ragged 70-130% 70-130% 70-1306% 'Hydrocarbon Range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2CSC9 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range 'C�C,z Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes AND CgC,o Aromatic Hydrocarbons eluting in that range 4Only applies to samples collected in air-tight containers Aliphatic and Aromatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immedately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete. • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 9/20/2004 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 Sample Information EPA Method 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds Client: SP, Inc. Lab ID: 409127 Client ID: 409017 Webb St Salem Day 1 North Sidewall State: Solid Date Received: 09/14/04 Date Analyzed: 09/16/04 Date Sampled: 09/07/04 Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Acetone ND Chloromethane ND Acetonitrile ND Chloroprene ND Acrolein ND 3-Chloropropene ND Acrlonitrile ND 3-Chloropropionitrile ND Allyl Alcohol ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND Allyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Benzene ND Dibromomethane ND Benzyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoacetone ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoform ND Cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene ND Bromochloromethane ND Trans-l,4-dichloro-2-butene ND N-Butanol ND Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND n-Butylbenzene 480 1,2-Dichloroethane ND sec-But (benzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Cis-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND Trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Chloral Hydrate ND 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol ND Chlorobenzene ND Cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene ND Trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Chlorobromomethane ND 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane ND Chloroethane ND Diethyl Ether ND 2-Chloroethanol ND 1,4-Dioxane ND Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) Sulfide ND Epiclhorohydrin ND 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether IND Ethanol ND Chloroform IND Ethyl Acetate IND CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE Pape 1 of 2 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Lab ID: 409127 Client ID: 409017 Webb St Salem Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Ethylbenzene ND Proparg I Alcohol ND Ethylene Oxide ND B-Propiolactone ND Ethyl Methacrylate ND Propionitrile ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND N-Propylamine ND Hexachloroethane ND N-Propylbenzene ND 2-Hexanone ND Pyridine ND 2-H droxypropionitrile ND Styrene ND Iodomethane ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isobutyl Alcohol ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isopropylbenzene ND Tetrachloroethene ND p-lsopropyltoluene ND Toluene ND Malononitrile ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Methacrylonitrile ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Methanol ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Methylene Chloride (Dcm) ND Trichloroethene ND Methyl Iodide ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND Methyl Methacrylate ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (Mibk) ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Naphthalene ND Vinyl Acetate ND Nitrobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 2-Nitropropane ND o-X Iene ND Pentachloroethane ND m&p-Xylene ND 2-Picoline IND Internal Standard Recoveries N 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 1,2- Dichlorobenzene-d4 87 Fluorobenzene 105 Method Detection Limit: 50 ug/Kg • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting 9/17/2004 Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date Page 2 of 2 New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP VPH Analytical Report SAMPLE INFORMATION I Miscellaneous Sample Information Matrix " ❑ Aqueous 0 Soil ❑ Sediment ❑Other: I Project# Soil Removal Containers%',- OO Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: JWebb St Salem '-"E Aqueous(acid preserved) ❑ N/A 11 pH <2 ❑ pH >2 Comment: cOH Samplen,Pl Aqueous(TSP preserved) 2 N/A ❑ pH < 11 ❑ pH > 11 Comment: ml M Preservative Soil or ❑ N/A ❑ Samples NOT preserved in McOH or air-tight containers O 1:1+25% - - h m , Sediment ® Samples received in McOH ® Covering soil/sediment ❑ Not covering soil/sediment ❑ Other Temperature' Received on ice O Received at 4°C ±2°C ❑ Other: °C Da 1 Side all VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: Bottom Soil Pile North Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 03-1 1 u' 7Client'ID ,#4 9021' 2'409022ar X409023 Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP VPH 1 „,-.V,@1abr I D W409131I54 ;,=°g 409132 , x#409133 r; pf ;!N Date Collected:. €1"09/07104T;i 1*„:;209/07/044- !,A1,09167/,04' VPH Surrogate Standards;- a , tD6teRadoived- 100/14/04, ,1;,0 9/14 0 4-9-k-1N'109f14/04 MS: BFB RMPT,WD.ate,Preserved:"_ °u91071OA 11- 09/07104 09/07104 MS: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (1,4-DCB-d4) _ + Data Analyzed- ro9/16/0411 0016/04�,*,. A9l1,6YOd nlg Dilutidn<Factoc «>1,0” "'„; _k'rX-ai 0 1 0 " Mi 61 _, Oy ;< , .,,,13 ., 12 f Unadjusted C�Ca`Ahphatics N/A 50 mg/Kg ND ND ND Unadjustetl Cs C�z_Ahphatics � � N/A 500 mg/Kg ND 521 ND Benzena :_ C5-C8Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND Eth lbenzene cs-clz Alipn 0.100 mg/Kg ND 0.430 ND Methyl-tert butyl ether.*ZA4 E; c5-c8 Allph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND Naphth2lene a_,,,", . 'moi« r N/A 0.100 mg/Kg ND 16.6 1.01 TolueneC5-C8Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND ml&'p=X lenesa'�k";y -"c9-C12Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND 0.706 ND o-Xylene s *' 3r Cs-Cl2 Allpn 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND C5 Ga.Al phatic Hydrocarbons vNIAr ;50, *gym /K , ND ND ND -- 9 9 C9C2AIIphati9HH t "2191piN/Arm1& 13 mg/Kg; i ND 521 ND Cs C,b Arom_atic H .drocarbons - r +m ND 449 51.7 9!K9g- 8FB!Surrogate a%'Redove :- 70% 65% 60% 1,4�DCB i Surrogate"/ Recovery g 104% 92% 103% Surrogate Acceptance RangeXW <1 70-130% 1 70-130% 70-130% 'Hydrocarbon Range data excludes concentrations of any surrogates)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2CSC8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range 'C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes AND Cg C,o Aromatic Hydrocarbons eluting in that range °Only applies to samples collected in air-tight containers Aliphatic and Aromatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immedately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete. • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 9/20/2004 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 Sample Information EPA Method 82608 Volatile Organic Compounds Client: SP, Inc. Lab ID: 409134 Client ID: 409024 Webb St Salem Day 2. East Sidewall State: Solid Date Received: 09/14/04 Date Analyzed: 09/16/04 Date Sampled: 09/07/04 Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Acetone ND Chloromethane ND Acetonitrile ND Chloroprene ND Acrolein ND 3-Chloropropene ND Acrlonitrile ND 3-Chloropropionitrile ND Allyl Alcohol ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND Allyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Benzene ND Dibromomethane ND Benzyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoacetone ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoform ND Cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene ND Bromochloromethane ND Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND N-Butanol ND Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND n-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND sec-Butyl benzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND tert-But (benzene ND Cis-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND Trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Chloral Hydrate ND 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol ND Chlorobenzene ND Cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene ND Trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Chlorobromomethane ND 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane ND Chloroethane ND Diethyl Ether ND 2-Chloroethanol ND 1,4-Dioxane ND Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) Sulfide ND Epiclhorohydrin ND 2-Chloroeth I Vinyl Ether ND Ethanol ND Chloroform ND Ethyl Acetate IND CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE Pape 1 of 2 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Lab ID: 409134 Client ID: 409024 Webb St Salem Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Ethylbenzene ND Propargyl Alcohol ND Ethylene Oxide ND B-Propiolactone ND Ethyl Methacrylate ND Propionitrile ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND N-Propylamine ND Hexachloroethane ND N-Propylbenzene ND 2-Hexanone ND Pyridine ND 2-Hydroxypropionitrile ND Styrene ND Iodomethane ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isobutyl Alcohol ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isopropylbenzene ND Tetrachloroethene ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Toluene ND Malononitrile ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Methacrylonitrile ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Methanol ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Methylene Chloride (Dcm) ND Trichloroethene ND Methyl Iodide ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND Methyl Methacrylate ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (Mibk) ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Naphthalene 153 Vinyl Acetate ND Nitrobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 2-Nitropropane ND o-Xylene ND Pentachloroethane ND m&p-Xylene ND 2-Picoline ND Internal Standard Recoveries N 4-Bromofluorobenzene _ 101 1,2- Dichlorobenzene-d4 85 Fluorobenzene 111 Method Detection Limit: 50 ug/Kg • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting 9/17/2004 Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date Paae 2 of 2 LLIMASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT WSC-CAM Exhibit VII A-1 OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 21 May 2004 Revision No. 3.2 ( BUREAU OF WASTE SITE CLEANUP Final Page ]0 of 32 MADEP MGP Response Action Analytical Report Certification Form au§tz-`.�:.'S..*en'..'✓.u,�::_.aA4 .dv.ef^�..,.r z,-.va5i,wke.x.r,5rs':.,�-w:�w... �*ehsbu�-�� .__< «s'."�Si.,�:s.... . -.az. l.> _�.. .<.3 - a[ MADEP MCP ANALYTICAL METHOD REPORT CERTIFICATION FARM LaboratoryName: C t kc, I Projectm (7?1^ Project Location: This Form provides certifications for the following dataset:(list Laboratory Sample ID Number(s)] Sample Matrices: C Groundwater /soil/Sediment Ge Drinking Water a Other: MGP SW-846 82606()( 8151A( ) 8330 ( ) 60108 ( ) 1 7470A/lA( } Methods Vaed 82700( } 8081 A( 6020 ( ) 9014M'( ) As specified in MADEP 8082( } 8021 B O EPH 00 W 7000 S3( ) 7196A() Compendium of 1 List Release Tracking Number(RTN),if known Analytical Methods, 2 M-SW-846 Method 9014 or MADEP Physiologically Available Cyanide(PAC)Method (check all that apply) 3 5–SW-846.Methods 7000 Series List individual methodand analyte. An affirmative response to questions A,S, C and D is required for"Presumptive Certainty„status A Were all samples received by the tab oratory in a condition consistent with [lyes DINo' that,described on the Chain-of-Custody documentation for the data set? Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified analytical method(s) B included in this report followed, including the requirement to note and C h'es ❑ No' discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance standards or guidelines? j Does the data included in this report meet all the analytical requirements C P for"Presumptive Certainty', as described in.Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c) and L Yes 0 No' {d) of tfle MADEP document CAM VII A, "Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data"? D VPH and EPN.Methods onto-, Was the VPH or EPH Method conducted CE No without.significant modifications(see Section 11.3 of respective Methods) A response to questions E and F below is required for"Presumptive Certainty"status E Were all analytical QC performance standards and recommendations for �f{es w7 No' the specified methods achieved? F E Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified ,,Yes; h No' method(s)reported? Ali Negative responses must be addressed in an attached Environmental Laboratory case narrative. 1, the undersigned,.atte,st under the pains and penalties of perjury that,based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical report is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,accurate and complete. — . Signature. �`1 Position:tt tl�h�ed��!ASu Printed Name: 1 1ClcZel` a IG <t Qate: 3 os— _ CAM VII A,rev, 3.2 April 2004 New England ChromaChem, Inc. 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 Laboratory Certification Number: MA-072 Analytical Report Package Prepared For: S.P. Engineering Mr. Bruce Poole P.O. Box 848 Salem,MA 01970 Date Received: 9/14/2004 NEC ID#'s: 409127 409128 14q2l?2 409133 409134 409135 409136 409137 402 131 9132 #303 Webb Street ProjectID/Location 9138 i This Analytical Report Package Includes: . MA DEP MCP Response Action Analytical Report Certification Form P. Sample Receipt Report attesting to the validity of the information on the Chain of Custody ► Case Narrative in support of the Analytical Report Certification Form ► Copy of the original Chain of Custody, cross referencing laboratory and field identifications . Analytical Data Reports Please contact us if you have any questions or if you require any further information on the analyses performed. Annmarie Flory Quality Control Coordinator New England ChromaChem, Inc. 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 Laboratory Certification Number: MA-072 client.* S.P. Engineering Project Name: #303 Webb Street NEC Sample ID: 409127 409128 409129 409130 1409131 1409132 405133 409134 409135 409136 14ogi37 1469138 Sampte Receipt InformatJon Report I Date Received. 09/14/04 Received By., Annmarie Fiery Sample Temperature Upon Receipt. 4 0 C Sample Preservations. Verified Preserved for Analytical Methods Requested i Sample Condition: Acceptable for Analytical Methods Requested Custody Seals. Absent For container type, and cross listing of field and laboratory ID's, Please see Chain of Custody included with this report Percent Solid(if applicable) Laboratory ID Percent Solid LaboiaforyrD Percent Solid 409127 87 409128 93 409129 81 409130 85 409131 91 409132 87 409133 88 409134 90 409135 92 409136 94 409137 ss 409138 77 Rev nwedas yned ereCuonlfaUy By: Annmarie Flory Pate: 3/3/05 Quality Control Coordinator New England ChromaChem, Inc. 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 Laboratory Certification Number: MA-072 FDateRecetvea' 9/14/04 Client., S.P. Engineering Project Name: #303 Webb Street NEC SamoleJD#'g.' 1409127 1409128 JA09129 409130 409131 1409132 409133 409134 409135 40913fi 409137 1409138 Case Narrative i There are no relevant data issues to discuss in regard to the above referenced samples. Method Blanks: No Detectable Analytes were observed in any of the analyses performed for this project. Reviewed&Signed Electronically By: Annmarle Flory Date: 313(05 Quality Control Coordinator New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 EPA Method 8260 LCS Recovery Report Analyst: Mr. Bruce Bornstein Laoratory ID: s091604 Date Analyzed: 09/16/04 Target Compound % Recovery Target Compound % Recovery Dichlorodifluoromethane 71 Dibromochloromethane 125 Chloromethane 110 1,2-dibromoethane 96 VinylChloride 124 Chlorobenzene 113 Bromomethane 76 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane 107 Chloroethane 74 Ethylbenzene 93 Trichlorofluoromethane 120 M-Xylene 79 1,1-dichloroethene 124 O-Xylene 74 MethyleneChloride 113 P-Xylene 72 MTBE 103 Styrene 83 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene 108 Isopropylbenzene 110 1,1-dichloroethane 120 Bromoform 113 2,2-dichloropropane 73 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 104 cis-1,2-dichloroethene 100 1,2,3-trichloropropane 103 Chloroform 112 n-propylbenzene 88 Bromochloromethane 86 Bromobenzene 110 0 1,1,1-trichloroethane 120 1,3,5-trimethyibenzene 71 1,1-dichloropropene 81 2-chlorotoluene 108 CarbonTetrachioride 94 4-chlorotoluene 74 1,2-dichloroethane 83 t-butylbenzene 87 Benzene 92 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 93 Trichloroethene 114 sec-butylbenzene 112 1,2-dichloropropane 121 p-isopropyltoluene 99 Bromodichloromethane 87 1,3-dichlorobenzene 116 Dibromomethane 87 1,4-dichlorobenzene 118 cis-1,3-dichloropropene 122 n-butylbenzene 114 Toluene 94 1,2-dichlorobenzene 111 trans-1,3-dichloropropene 110 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropan 89 1,1,2-trichloroethane 121 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 123 1,3-dichloropropane 72 Hexachiorobutadiene 101 Tetrachloroethene 70 Naphthalene 89 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene 81 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Bruce A. Bornstein 3/3/05 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 EPA Method 8260 Relative Percent Difference Report rLaboratory Identification: 409127 Date Analyzed: 9116/2004 Compound Results RPD % Target Compound Results RPD % Dichlorodifluoromethane 0 0 0.00 Dibromochloromethane 0 0 0.00 Chloromethane 0 0 0.00 1,2-dibromoethane 0 0 0.00 VinylChloride 0 0 0.00 Chiorobenzene 0 0 0.00 Bromomethane 0 0 0.00 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane 0 0 0.00 Chloroethane 0 0 0.00 Ethylbenzene 0 0 0.00 Trichlorofluoromethane 0 0 0.00 M-Xylene 0 0 0.00 1,1-dichloroethene 0 0 0.00 O-Xylene 0 0 0.00 MethyleneChloride 0 0 0.00 P-Xylene 0 0 0.00 MTBE 0 0 0.00 Styrene 0 0 0.00 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene 0 0 0.00 Isopropyibenzene 0 0 0.00 1,1-dichloroethane 0 0 0.00 Bromoform 0 0 0.00 2,2 dichloropropane 0 0 0.00 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 0 0 0.00 cis-1,2-dichloroethene 0 0 0.00 1,2,3-trichloropropane 0 0 0.00 Chloroform 0 0 0.00 n-propylbenzene 0 0 0.00 Bromochloromethane 0 0 0.00 Bromobenzene 0 0 0.00 1,1,1-trichloroethane 0 0 0.00 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 0 0 0.00 1,1-dichloropropene 0 0 0.00 2-chlorotoluene 0 0 0.00 CarbonTetrachloride 0 0 0.00 4-chlorotoluene 0 0 0.00 1,2-dichloroethane 0 0 0.00 t-butylbenzene 0 0 0.00 Benzene 0 0 0.00 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 0 0 0.00 Trichloroethene 0 0 0.00 sec-butylbenzene 0 0 0.00 1,2-dichloropropane 0 0 0.00 p-isopropyltoluene 0 0 0.00 Bromodichloromethane 0 0 0.00 1,3-dichlorobenzene 0 0 0.00 Dibromomethane 0 0 0.00 1,4-dichlorobenzene 0 0 0.00 cis-1,3-dichloro propene 0 0 0.00 n-butylbenzene 0 0 0.00 Toluene 0 0 0.00 1,2-dichlorobenzene 0 0 0.00 tra ns-1,3 A ich lo ropro pene 0 0 0.00 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane 0 0 0.00 1,1,2-trichloroethane 0 0 0.00 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 0 0 0.00 1,3-dichloropropane 0 0 0.00 Hexachiorobutadiene 0 0 0.00 Tetrachloroethene 0 0 0.00 Naphthalene 0 0 0.00 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene 0 0 0.00 Note: Result of 0 = N.D. This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 3/3/2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 EPA Method 8260 Laboratory Fortified Matrix Report Laboratory Identification: 409127sp Date Analyzed: 09/16/04 Target Compound % Recovery Target Compound % Recovery Dichlorodifluoromethane 113 Dibromochloromethane 95 Chloromethane 118 1,2-dibromoethane 115 UnylChloride 94 Chlorobenzene 94 Bromomethane 98 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane 85 Chloroethane 85 Ethylbenzene 110 Trichlorofluoromethane 82 M&PXylene 101 1,1-dichloroethene 105 ©-Xylene 92 MethyleneChloride 117 Styrene 93 MTBE 87 Isopropylbenzene 92 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene 115 Bromoform 89 1,1-dichloroethane 108 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 96 2,2-dichloropropane 88 1,2,3-trichloropropane 83 cis-l,2-dichloroethene 109 n-propylbenzene 120 Chloroform 89 Bromobenzene 111 Bromochloromethane 82 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 120 1,1,1-trichloroethane 106 2-chlorotoluene 105 1,1-dichloropropene 115 4-chlorotoluene 87 CarbonTetrachloride 112 t-butylbenzene 103 1,2-dichloroethane 102 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 94 Benzene 115 sec-butylbenzene 113 Trichloroethene 95 p-isopropyltoluene 109 1,2-dichloropropane 106 1,3-dichlorobenzene 100 Bromodichloromethane 98 1,4-dichlorobenzene 118 Dibromomethane 109 n-butylbenzene 87 cis-1,3-dichioropropene 115 1,2-dichlorobenzene 96 Toluene 104 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane 106 trans-1,3-dichioropropene 101 1,2,4-trichiorobenzene 93 1,1,2-trichloroethane 109 Hexachlorobutadiene 83 1,3-dichloropropane 95 Naphthalene 86 Tetrachioroethene 92 1,2,3-trichiorobenzene 113 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director. Mr. Bruce Bornstein 3/3/2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 MA DEP VPH Laboratory Control Sample Report Date Acquired: 09/19104 Laboratory LCS ID: V091604 Laboratory LCS Dupe ID: V091604D Target Compounds % Recovery LCS % Recovery LCS Duplicate MTBE 89 92 Benzene 105 88 Toluene 100 91 Ethylbenzene 92 85 M&P Xylene 101 109 O-Xylene 103 113 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 93 114 Naphthalene 107 95 � i i This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 3/3!2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 MA DEP VPH Relative Percent Difference Report Analyst: Ms. Dana Elting Date Acquired: 09/16/04 Laboratory ID: 409129 Results Relative Percent Difference Target Compounds --------------------. Duplicate % Pentane 0.000 0.000 0.00 2-Methylpentane 0.000 0.000 0.00 MTBE 0,000 0.000 0.00 Iso-octane 0.000 0.000 0.00 Benzene 0.000 0.000 0.00 Toluene 0.000 0.000 0.00 Nonane 0.000 0.000 0.00 Ethylbenzene 0.000 0.000 0.00 M&P Xylene 0.000 0.000 0.00 O-Xylene 0.000 0.000 0.00 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0,000 0.000 0.00 Naphthalene 0.003 0.002 0.05 2,5-Dibromotoluene 0.000 0.000 0.00 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein • 3/3/2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 MA DEP VPN Laboratory Fortified Matrix Report Analyst: Ms. Dana Elting Date Acquired: 09116/04 Laboratory ID: 409129 Recovery Target Compounds % Pentane 112 2-Methylpentane 113 MTBE 96 Iso-octane 103 Benzene 85 Toluene 98 Nonane 116 Ethylbenzene 95 M&P Xylene 108 O-Xylene 117 1,2,4-Trlmethylbenzene 96 Naphthalene 110 2,5-Dibromotoluene 120 I This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 313/2005 • New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 MA DEP EPH Initial Calibration Verification Report Laboratory ID: 1091604 Acquired On: 09116/04 Target Compounds % Recovery Naphthalene 79 2-Fluorobiphenyl 120 Acenaphthylene 119 Acenaphthene 111 Fluorene 87 Anthracene 107 Phenanthrene 82 Carbazole 80 Fiuoranthene 117 Pyrene 80 Benzo-a-anthracene 123 Chrysene 77 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 83 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 97 Benzo(a)pyrene 95 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 117 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 81 Benzo(g,hJ)perylene 97 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 313!2005 i New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 MA DEP EPH Relative Percent Difference Report Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Acquired On: 09116104 Laboratory ID: 409128 Results Relative Percent Difference Target Compounds Sample Duplicate % Naphthalene 0.000 0.000 0 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.000 0.000 0 Acenaphthylene 0.000 0.000 0 Acenaphthene 0.643 0.599 2 Fluorene 0.000 0.000 0 Anthracene 0.000 0.000 0 Phenanthrene 0.000 0.000 0 Carbazole 0.000 0.000 0 Fluoranthene 0.000 0.000 0 Pyrene 0.000 0.000 0 Benzo-a-anthracene 0.000 0.000 0 Chrysene 0.000 0.000 0 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.000 0.000 0 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.000 0.000 0 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.000 0.000 0 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.000 0.000 0 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.000 0.000 0 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.297 0.264 2 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 3/3/2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 ji MA DEP EPH Laboratory Fortified Matrix Report Acquired On: 09/16104 Laboratory ID: L409133 Target Compounds % Recovery Naphthalene 110 2-Fluorobiphenyl 67 Acenaphthylene 97 Acenaphthene 90 Fluorene 113 Anthracene 83 Phenanthrene 66 Carbazole 105 Fluoranthene 66 Pyrene 98 Benzo-a-anthracene 105 Chrysene 92 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 86 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 78 Benzo(a)pyrene 122 Dibenzo(a,h)anth race ne 103 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 93 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 99 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 3/3/2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 MA DEP EPH Laboratory Control Sample Report Laboratory Control Sample Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Laboratory ID: P091604 Laboratory ID: P091604D Acquired On: 09/16104 Acquired On: 09/16/04 Target Compounds % Recovery Target Compounds % Recovery Naphthalene 89 Naphthalene 123 2-Fluorobiphenyl 98 2-Fluorobiphenyl 90 Acenaphthylene 94 Acenaphthylene 77 Acenaphthene 115 Acenaphthene 99 Fluorene 104 Fluorene 118 Anthracene 88 Anthracene 119 Phenanthrene 118 Phenanthrene 101 Carbazole 90 Carbazole 96 Fluoranthene 92 Fluoranthene 123 Pyrene 98 Pyrene 88 Benzo-a-anthracene 84 Benzo-a-anthracene 96 Chrysene 102 Chrysene 95 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 84 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 75 Benzo(b)fiuoranthene 79 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 87 Benzo(a)pyrene 101 Benzo(a)pyrene 121 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 105 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 81 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 104 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 79 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 109 Benzo(g,h,i)peryiene 114 I This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein 3/3/2005 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Saiem, MA 01970 EPH Fractionation Check Standard Results Laboratory ID: FC091604 ' Acquired On: 09/16/04 Alkanes % Recovery PAH's % Recovery C9 73 Naphthalene 104 C10 113 2-Methyllnaphthalene 119 C12 90 Acenaphthylene 125 C14 115 Acenaphthene 80 C16 77 Fluorene 78 C18 93 Anthracene 92 C19 113 Phenanthrene 94 C20 76 OTP 113 COD 100 Fluoranthene 125 C22 103 Pyrene 116 C24 83 Benzo-a-anthracene 92 C26 117 Chrysene 96 C28 91 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 108 C30 80 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 78 C36 108 Benzo(a)pyrene 85 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 93 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 115 Benzo(g,h,i)peryiene 117 This report has been reviewed and electronically signed by: Analyst: Mr. Adam Proctor Laboratory Director: Mr. Bruce Bornstein • 31312005 New England ChronfaChem, Inc. MA DEP VPH Analytical Report SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information Matnx ❑ Aqueous O Soil ❑Sediment ❑Other: Project# Remaining Soils Ca ttain rs O Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: Webb St Salem Day 2 Aqueous(acid preserved) ❑ NtA ❑ H<2 ❑ H>2 Comment: P P I, Ssmplei Aqueous(TSP preserved) 9 NIA ❑pH<11 ❑ pH> I I Comment: ml McOH presenia{Nes Sail or ❑ N/A ❑Samples NOT preserved in McOH or air-tight containers O 1:1+25/o i Sediment 10 Samples received in McOH B Covering soiltsediment ❑ Not covering soil/sediment ❑ Other Tem raturp? © Received on ice Z Received at 4°C ±2°C ❑ Other: °C Sidewalls VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: South West Bottom Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 03-1 Clienttp: 409025 409026 409027 . Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP VPH k lid: ' 4tSS135 4119135 409137 t7ate C0I€acted* . 09107!04 (39/47104 09147104 VPH Surrogate Standards: L3ate Receiued 09114!04 09114!04 09!14104 MS: BFB Qate Preselved< 09107104 (39107!04 09107104: :: MS: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4(1,4-DCB-d4) 1ateAnafyzed, 08115!04 09116(04 09?16f04> L? {atWnaCfa1 1.ft 1 U 1.17 f°fvlrlutti fl' Fico` eTar e€A-ri 1 e Ei13t.Ralnb Rt {mg1K ) iJnits; Unadjusted CgAl)pilatics N/A 50 mg/Kg ND ND ND UniflWatedC CfzNiphat€cs N/A 500 mg/Kg NO ND NO Ben ehe C5-CSAliph 0.100 In /Kg ND NO ND • tietrerre C9-C12 Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg NO ND NO Meth _{� - j ever CS-C8 Allph 0.100 mg/Kg ND NO ND Na ki aletze N/A 0.100 mg/Kg ND NO NO Toluene c5-c8 Alipn 0.100 m /K ND ND NQ m & . 'C9-C12 Aliph 0.100 mg/ q ND ND ND o-X Igoe C9-C12 Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg NO NO NO C�CgA 3hatrcH}drxicat oto N!A 50 mpfKg ;', ND NO NO q AliphalfeHydto ltscrls "' . WA 5flfl tzlfliKg NO ND ND C CSC Ate1046 Hydracatlavns hlfA SII mgf# g. ! ND ND ND tion© to°!o Fiecuve 96% 92% 85% y,4-DAB dg Starrog to°h Recoyety 114% 111% 115% �SUtYb. ettBA Ce `. nCef� h _e 70-130% 70-130% 70-130°l0 'Hydrocarbon Range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2CiCs Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range 'CsC,Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes AND Cs C,o Aromatic Hydrocarbons eluting in that range "Only applies to samples collected in air-tight containers Aliphatic and Aromatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immedately responsible for obtaining the information,the material contained in this report is,to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete. Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 9/20/2004 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 • 978-744-6600 Sample Information EPA Method 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds Client: SP, Inc. Lab ID: 411128 Client ID: 411033-9 Webb St State: Solid Remaining Soil Under Pile Date Received: 11/12/04 Date Analyzed: 11/16/04 Date Sampled: 11/08/04 Analytical nal tical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Acetone ND Chloromethane ND Acetonitrile ND Chloroprene ND Acrolein ND 3-Chloropropene ND Acrlonitrile ND 3-Chloropropionitrile ND Allyl Alcohol ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND Allyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Benzene ND Dibromomethane . ND Benzyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoacetone ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoform ND Cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene ND Bromochloromethane ND Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND N-Butanol ND Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND n-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND sec-Butylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND tert-Butyl benzene ND Cis-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND Trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Chloral Hydrate ND 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol ND Chlorobenzene ND Cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene ND Trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Chlorobromomethane ND 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane ND Chloroethane ND Diethyl Ether ND 2-Chloroethanol ND 1,4-Dioxane ND Bis-(2-Chloroeth I) Sulfide ND Epiclhorohydrin ND 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND Ethanol ND Chloroform ND Ethyl Acetate ND CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE Paqe 1 of 2 • EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Lab ID: 411128 Client ID: 411033-9 Webb St Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Ethylbenzene ND Propargyl Alcohol ND Ethylene Oxide ND B-Propiolactone ND Ethyl Methacrylate ND Propionitrile ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND N-Prop famine ND Hexachloroethane ND N-Propylbenzene ND 2-Hexanone ND Pyridine ND 2-H droxypropionitrile ND Styrene ND lodomethane ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isobutyl Alcohol ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND I sopropy Ibenzene ND Tetrachloroethene ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Toluene ND Malononitrile ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Methacrylonitrile ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Methanol ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND • Methylene Chloride (Dcm) ND Trichloroethene ND Methyl Iodide ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND Methyl Methacrylate ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (Mibk) ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Naphthalene 169 Vinyl Acetate ND Nitrobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 2-Nitropropane ND m&p-Xylene ND Pentachloroethane ND o-Xylene ND 2-Picoline ND Internal Standard Recoveries N 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 1,2- Dichlorobenzene-d4 89 Fluorobenzene 116 Method Detection Limit: 50 ug/Kg • 11111712014 Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date Pape 2 of 2 Chain of Custody Record 1 Client&Contact Name: Project Name&Number: r1 1+1 � l�✓S� `^�..F` �� III Collected by: 6�rrwcp l )A T� Sample Information Analyses Required cos °cmc J°31 °s�o �.Q"J, °6 � mf 0�0 Go °,sG oc �G seg' Quoo° e OG �3 OA� JQ1O NEC ID# - Zoe C9�o / /O�c/ , �� Q�'� Qhs e1�o `cQ� JQ� O'er 2 \J()tq 2 {: { �(illQ ! ,�!: wet I I � 3 I 4 Relinquished by: /' \ Date Time Received by: New England ChromaChem, Inc Relinquished by: Date Time Received by: 6 Nichols Street -Salem, MA 01970 7 .(978)744-6600 Preservations: I =Chilled at 4 degrees,C 2=Preserved at pH<2 with HCI(VOC's) 3=Preservedat pH22 with HNO3(Metals) 4=Preserved at pH between 5&9(PCB's Method.608) 5=Preserved at pH<2 with HCI or H2SO4(FOG Method 1664) }A 6=Lab to preserve' 7='CH301-1(solid VOCs) New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP EPH Analytical Report •SAMPLE INFORMATION I Miscellaneous Sample Information MatrixRgReceived eous O Soil ❑ Sediment ❑ Other: Project# Soil Removal Containatisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: Webb St Salem Aqueou ❑ N/A ❑ pH <2 ❑ pH>2 Comment: Temperon ice O Received at 4° C ❑ Other Sidewalls Day 1 Day 1 Day 1 Day 2 EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: East West Soil Pile North Method for Ranges: MA DEP EPH Client ID: 409018 409020 409022 409023 Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP EPH Lab ID: 409128 409130 409132 409133 Date Collected: 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 EPH Surrogates Date Thawed: N/A N/A N/A N/A Aliphatic: chloro-octadecane (COD) Date Received: 9/14/2004 9/14/2004 9/14/2004 9/14/2004 Aromatic: ortho-terphenyl (OTP) Date Extracted: 9/22/2004 9/22/2004 9/22/2004 9/22/2004 EPH Fractionation Surrogates Date Analyzed: 9/23/2004 9/23/2004 9/23/2004 9/23/2004 1. 2-Fluorobiphenyl Time Analyzed: 11:54 12:27 13:01 13:35 2. 2-Bromonaphthalene Dilution Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 % Solid(soil) : 89 90 87 88 Range/Target Analyte RL(mg/Kg) Units Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics 100 mg/Kg ND ND 1540 ND Naphthalene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 16.6 1.21 Diesel PAH 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 14.2 0.840 Analytes Phenanthrene 0.100 mg/Kg NO ND 0.210 ND Acenaphthene 0.100 mg/K0.643 0.863 0.677 ND Acenaphthalene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 0.483 ND Anthracene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND ND Benzo(A)Anthracene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 0.388 ND Benzo(A)Pyrene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 0.293 ND Benzo(B)Fluoranthene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 0.193 ND Benzo(G,H,I)Perylene 0.100 mg/Kg 0.297 0.630 1.62 ND Other Benzo(K)Fluoranthene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 0.579 ND Target PAH Chrysene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND ND Analytes Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene 0.100 mg/Kg ND 0.404 0.624 ND Fluoranthene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND ND Fluorene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND ND ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 0.100 mg/Kg ND 0.186 0.287 ND Pyrene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND 8.81 0.706 Cs=GfaAli' ` � 9Jff- _ 0 7ap 0go g J D � iDIP*Cls',Gss-AllohaticeFijfdrocarbons 100 _. 'mg/Kg Nq Nb. -,+ 21(0 ,�� NDL�„ G11aC2z Aromatic H tlro¢arbor s 100 g g SND ;„_ 1495 x uNQ Yw +m tK ND„ xIR Aliphatic Surro ate'%a`Recovery .. x 87% 81% 79% 77% AromaticSiarzo ate°lo Recove. G A" 102% 89% 102% 107% Sample SLi&bgateAcceptance;Ran e, .. 'u - ' ��P,1.- 3940 140°/,a, : "0-440%1'40%1' T 4Q-1,40°!0 k ;x40-1400/-R Fractionation Surrogate(1) °1° ReeoveE� ,, . . 94% 86% 90% 84% F`ractiorationSurFogate.2)°/6'Recove ,.-, ,, -��,, � �w . al Vh 91% 94% 87% 111% FractionationSiarco ateAcce' tanceRan eo�� =j '348140% + ' 40' 40%, X140-,140P/off k40-14010 ; Hydocarbon Range data exclude area counts of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range 2C,1 Czz Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes • Prepared y: Ms. Dana Elting Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 9/27/2004 New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP EPH Analytical Report •SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information Matrix ❑ Aqueous 0 Soil ❑ Sediment ❑ Other: Project# Containers I t7 Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: Webb St Salem Aqueous Preservatives 1 ❑ N/A ❑ pH <2 ❑ pH >2 Comment: TemperatureO Received on ice 0 Received at 4° C ❑ Other Sidewall Day 2 EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: East . Soil Pile Method for Ranges: MA DEP EPH Client ID: 409024 409028 Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP EPH Lab ID: 409134 409138 Date Collected: 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 EPH Surrogates Date Thawed: N/A N/A Aliphatic: chloro-octadecane (COD) Date Received: 9/14/2004 9/14/2004 Aromatic: ortho-terphenyl (OTP) Date Extracted: 9/22/2004 9/22/2004 EPH Fractionation Surrogates Date Analyzed: 9/23/2004 9/23/2004 1. 2-Fluorobiphenyl Time Analyzed: 14:08 14:42 2. 2-Bromonaphthalene Dilution Factor: 1.0 1.0 Solid(soil) : 90 77 Range/Target Analyte RL(mg/Kg) Units Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics 100 mg/Kg ND 105 Naphthalene 0.100 mg/Kg ND 1.02 Diesel PAH 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Analytes Phenanthrene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Acenaphthene 0.100 mg/Kg ND 1.81 Acenaphthalene 0.100 mg/Kg ND NO Anthracene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Benzo(A)Anthracene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Benzo(A)Pyrene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Benzo(B)Fluoranthene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Benzo(G,H,I)Perylene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Other Benzo(K)Fluoranthene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Target PAH Chrysene 0.100 mg/Kg 0.413 ND Analytes Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Fluoranthene 0.100 mg/Kg 0.594 NO Fluorene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 0.100 mg/Kg ND ND Pyrene 0.100 mg/Kg 0.556 ND F , Cs-C1s Aliphatic Hydrocailions � " 100 w„ tmg'/Kgs��,NDr `rND to , _ J3, C1Q-C36'Aliphattc.Hydrocarboris" � 100s ¢ rng/KgND, � ``F` a ;ND-an ,a r ,x v ,C i C22Aromatic"Hydrocarbons"6 ` 4.TMAOOMA " NDS X1,024 k 'fit0ff_ Aliphatic.SurrogateP/o"Reco82% 82% Arorpatic Surro`ate-% Recove 1t "'°" ; ' te r 78% 94% Sample.Surro ate"Acceptance Range _^ ` "" X40-1I 4Q%a " 40=140%0 Fractionatibh Surro titer �1 °l.Recove � _" ti 9 O', ry 1� a 104% 90% Ffactionatibrt Surrogate(2)3/6',Recovery est` - y 96% 83% Fractjoftatioit Surro ate Acte tarce Ran e4s'" 'U' ' _` t40=140% X140 140°10= z 40-14'0%yam j"40=140°/a Hydocarbon Range data exclude area counts of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range 2CJ1_C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH Analytes • Prepare y: Ms. Dana Elting Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 9/27/2004 . New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 Sample Information EPA Method 8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Gas Chromatography Client: SP, Inc. Lab ID: 409132 Client ID: 409022 Webb St Salem State: Solid Date Sampled: 09/07/04 Date Received: 09/14/04 Date Extracted: 09/15/04 Date Analyzed: 09/16/04 PARAMETER RESULTS (UG/KG) • PCB 1016 ND PCB 1221 ND PCB 1232 ND PCB 1242 ND PCB 1248 ND PCB 1254 ND PCB 1260 ND Soil Method detection Limit= 10 ug/Kg Liquid Detection Limit= 1 ug/L • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting 9/28/2004 jElectronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 • Sample Information EPA Method 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds Client: SP, Inc. Lab ID: 409132 Client ID: 409022 Webb St Salem Day 1 , Soil Pile State: Solid Date Received: 09/14/04 Date Analyzed: 09/17/04 Date Sampled: 09/07/04 Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results u /Kg ug/Kg Acetone ND Chloromethane ND Acetonitrile ND Chloroprene ND Acrolein ND 3-Chloropropene ND Acrlonitrile ND 3-Chloropropionitrile ND Allyl Alcohol ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND Allyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Benzene ND Dibromomethane ND Benzyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO • Bromoacetone ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoform ND Cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene ND Bromochloromethane ND Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND N-Butanol ND Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND n-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND sec-Butyl benzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Cis-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND Trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Chloral Hydrate ND 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol ND Chlorobenzene ND Cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene ND Trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Chlorobromomethane ND 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane ND Chloroethane ND Diethyl Ether ND 2-Chloroethanol ND 1,4-Dioxane ND Bis-(2-Chloroeth I) Sulfide ND Epiclhoroh drin ND 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND Ethanol ND Chloroform ND Ethyl Acetate ND • CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE Page 1 of 2 EPA Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds • Lab ID: 409132 Client ID: 409022 Webb St Salem Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results u /K ug/Kg Ethylbenzene 430 Propargyl Alcohol ND Ethylene Oxide ND B-Propiolactone ND Ethyl Methacrylate ND Propionitrile ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND N-Propylamine ND Hexachloroethane ND N-Propylbenzene ND 2-Hexanone ND Pyridine ND 2-Hydroxypropionitrile ND Styrene ND Iodomethane ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND IsobutylAlcohol ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isopropylbenzene ND Tetrachloroethene ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Toluene ND Malononitrile ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Methacrylonitrile ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Methanol ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Methylene Chloride (Dcm) ND Trichloroethene ND Methyl Iodide ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND • Methyl Methacrylate ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4-Meth I-2-pentanone (Mibk) ND 1,3,5-Trimeth (benzene ND Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Naphthalene 16600 Vinyl Acetate ND Nitrobenzene ND Vinyl Chloride ND 2-Nitropropane ND o-Xylene ND Pentachloroethane ND m&p-Xylene 706 2-Picoline ND 17.73 mg/kg Total Internal Standard Recoveries N 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 1,2- Dichlorobenzene-d4 95 Fluorobenzene 92 Method Detection Limit: 50 ug/Kg • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting 10/25/2004 Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date Page 2 of 2 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 pie Information Method 82608 Volatile Organic Compounds Client: SP, Inc. Lab ID: 409138 Client ID: 409028 Webb St Salem Day 2 Soil Pile State: Solid Date Received: 09/14/04 Date Analyzed: 09/16/04 Date Sampled: 09/07/04 Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results u /K ug/Kg Acetone ND Chloromethane ND Acetonitrile ND Chloroprene ND Acrolein NO 3-Chloropropene ND Acrlonitrile ND 3-Chloropropionitrile ND Allyl Alcohol ND 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND Allyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Benzene ND Dibromomethane ND Benzyl Chloride ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoacetone ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromodichloromethane ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Bromoform ND Cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene ND Wanochloromethane ND Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND ol 965 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2- utanone (MEK) ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND n-Butylbenzene ND 1,2-Dichloroethane ND sec-Butylbenzene ND 1,1-Dichloroethene ND tert-Butylbenzene ND Cis-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Disulfide ND Trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Chloral Hydrate ND 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol ND Chlorobenzene ND Cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene ND Trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Chlorobromomethane ND 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane ND Chloroethane ND Diethyl Ether ND 2-Chloroethanol ND 1,4-Dioxane ND Bis-(2-Chloroethyl) Sulfide ND Epiclhorohydrin ND 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether NO Ethanol ND Chloroform ND Ethyl Acetate ND CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE • Method 8260 Volatile Organic Compounds Lab ID: 409138 Client ID: 409028 Webb St Salem Analytical Results Parameter Results Parameter Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Ethylbenzene ND Proparg I Alcohol ND Ethylene Oxide ND B-Propiolactone ND Ethyl Methacrylate ND Propionitrile ND HexachlOrobutadiere ND N-Propylamine ND Hexachloroethane ND N-Pro ylbenzene ND 2-Hexanone ND Pyridine ND 2-Hydroxypropionitrile ND Styrene ND lodomethane ND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isobutyl Alcohol ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Isopropylbenzene ND Tetrachloroethene ND p-Isopropyltoluene ND Toluene ND Malononitrile ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Methacrylonitrile ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Methanol ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Methylene Chloride(Dcm) ND Trichloroethene ND Methyl Iodide ND Trichlorofluoromethane ND Methyl Methacrylate ND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4- thyl-2-pentanone (Mibk) ND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND I Tert-Butyl Ether ND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 147 NgMthalene 1020 Vinyl Acetate ND Nitrobenzene IND Vinyl Chloride ND 2-Nitatropropane ND o-X lene ND Penchloroethane IND m&p-X iene ND 2-Picoline IND 2. 13 mg/kg Total Internal Standard Recoveries N 4-Bromofluorobenzene 1 101 1,2- Dichlorobenzene-d4 1 88 Fluorobenzene 107 Method Detection Limit: 50 ug/Kg Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting 10/25/2004 Electronically.signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date 0 • New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP VPH Analytical Report SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information Matnx" � k;; ❑ Aqueous 0 Soil ❑Sediment ❑Other: Project# Sol Removal Containe'r's:Hr' O Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking I Location lWebb St Salem {Ftp,,' Aqueous(acid preserved) ❑ N/A ❑pH<2 ❑ pH>2 Comment Sample4 fl,.Aqueous(TSP preserved) 0 N/A ❑ pH< 11 ❑ pH> 11 Comment: ml McOH Preservative'Soil or 10 N/A ❑Samples NOT preserved in McOH or air-tight containers 0 11+25% Sediment IN Samples received in McOH ® Covering soil/sediment ❑ Not covering soil/sediment ❑ Other T6*- hil O Received on ice 0 Received at 4'C t 2°C ❑ Other:_ °C VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: Day 2:, Soil Pile Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 03-1 ;< Cll' ID;c 409028 Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP VPH a ID" 6u+a Date Collected q 09/07/04 ' =sv v VPH Surrogate Standards: ,3 ,DateRecelvedz 09/14/04+yE"- - " w,s � , ,; MS: BFB ,Date`Pfeserved'409/07/04 4 " ? °s r MS: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (1,4-DCB-d4) # 'Date`Analyzed;; MOIStIJre" °°U 23 a rr '' s F� Wr y Range/Target Anal e ' v'y Eluk'Range. mg/k6)'.` Unadjusted`C5 CBRlphatics' ,' N/A 50 mg/Kg ND Unad)ustedbC9Ct2AllphaticsZ;, N/A 500 mg/Kg 842 Benzene 'k r' ,' 3 "?x ;r,4 >, C5-caAlipn 0.100 mg/Kg ND • Eth (benzene lC9-C12Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND Methyl tert butyl ether °; tM C5-C8Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND Naphthalene t a. ; °° .,,,,.. ` _< N/A 0.100 mg/Kg 1.02 C5-c8Al!ph 0.100 mg/Kg ND c9-C12Aliph 0.100 mg/Kg ND O XylenerY ,�,'"`„�,�+ C9-C12Alioh 0.100 mg/Kg ND CS CBAliphat{c Hydrocarbons, syni x N/A „ 04}f ,, mglKg; a ND C9 C12kA'IphaGc Flydoca�bons' gj '°UtiN/H'fYsk,500 tmg/Kg 842 CexC1V)Nr,omatic,Hydro $carbogs'M15» z N/A` 1 50° � mg/Kg '' 151 r„ s,,, BFB Sur_r'.ogate % R'ecovery' ' 88% 1 4 DCB d4 Surrogate;'/°Recovery 108% Sur.ogate Acce tari'ce Range -' 70-130% 'Hydrocarbon Range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 'CBCs Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range 'Cs C,z Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes AND CsCro Aromatic Hydrocarbons eluting in that range °Only applies to samples collected in air-tight containers Aliphatic and Aromatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS. I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete. • Prepared by: Ms. Dana Elting Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 10/25/2004 New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street • Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 Client: SP, Inc. Sample Identification Information Date Date Date Date Samplel Analytical Results Lab ID: Client ID: Sampled Received Prepared Analyzed State As Hg 409132 409022 Webb St Salem 09/07/04 09/14/04 09/21/04 09/23/04 Solid 7.3 0.327 Ank ix l Detection Limits Analytical Parameter As H Solid Sample Detection Limits: m /K 1.6 0.020 Liquid Sample Detection Limits: m /L 0.0160 10.0002 Analytical Methodology Solids Liquids Parameter Method As EPA Method 200.7 mg/Kg m /L Hg EPA Method 245.1 mg/Ko m /L ared by: Ms. Dana Elting 9/28/2004 Electrontcall si ned and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 • 978-744-6600 Client: SP, Inc. Sample Identification Information Date Date Date Date sample Analytical Results Lab ID: Client ID: Sampled Received Prepared Analyzed State FP 409138 409028 Webb St Salem 09/07/04 09/14/04 n/a 09/17/04 solid >200 x I Detection Limits Analytical Parameter FP Solid Sample Detection Limits: m /K Liquid Sample Detection Limits: m /L Analytical Methodology Solids Liquids Parameter Method FP Flash Point ASTM Method D-93 Deq F Deg F JPIWred by: Ms. Dana Elting 10/25/04 LELectronlcally signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date New England ChromaChem 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 978-744-6600 Client: SP, Inc. Sample Identification Information Date Date Date Date Sample Analytical Results Lab ID: Client ID: Sampled Received Prepared Analyzed State As Hg 409138 409028 Webb St Salem 09/07404 09/14/04 09/21/04 09/23/04 Solid 6.56 0.245 Auk ix I Detection Limits Analytical Parameter As H Solid Sam le Detection Limits: nn /K 1.6 110.020 Li uid Sam le Detection Limits: m /L 0.0160 10.0002 Analytical Methodology Solids Liquids Parameter Method As EPA Method 200.7 mg/Kg m /L Hg EPA Method 245.1 mg/Kg m /L ared by: Ms. Dana Elting 9/28/2004 Electronicall si ned and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director Date Chain of Ccedy Record Client& Contact Name: Project Name_& Number: Collected by: Sample Information Analyses Required \Doc m G° X i° �1d` Go ' ,o,�/(�j' mtir �m s'Oa x Q� S° Ca O 1Q QG Qm 4Q JQ O`r NEC ID W GV- 97 q K X x p15" Z VeG -7 4-6, M09/.2t c 1 V 7 - s '1� ,2C, `1020 2 VBG 7 S �g09/3 1 UO '"7 5 co 8, Z V+-G 7 G 0 17,-3 .� r B—f n c © z � +G S - -12 x '(109/ A-1A � o� va c g 1 s � a 1 VOA S G ?-12 M0913Cr, 0 Z7 1 VO (3 Relinquished by: Date Time Received by: / New England ChromaChem, Inc Relinquished by: Date Tlme Received by: 6 Nichols Street Salem, MA 01970 (978)744-6600 Preservations: 1 =Chilled at 4 degrees C 2=Preserved at pH<2 with HCI(VOC's) 3=Preserved at pH<2 with HNO3(Metals) 4=Preserved at pH between 5&9(PCB's Method 608) 5=Preserved at pH<2 with HCl or H2SO4(FOG Method 1664) 6=Lab to preserve 7=CH30H(solid VOC's) [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: December 16, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION 4:M-MA034 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LABORATORY REPORT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Soil Sample From: Under Pile Sample ID#: 0411033 Method 4 Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cadmium mg/kg 0.32 200.7 11/24/04 Chromium mg/kg 37.7 200.7 11/24/04 Lead mg/kg 168.2 220.1 11/24/04 • Sampled By: Bruce Poole Sampled On: 11/11/04 Sample Received: 11/11/04 The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: • • 2F)ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: December 16, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION #:M-MA034 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ QA/QC LABORATORY REPORT FORM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blank MDL LCS RPD MS Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cadmium mg/kg 0.0007 .001 95% 2.18% 98.4% 11/24/04 Chromium mg/kg 0.002 .01 88.9% 3.86% 103% 11/24/04 Lead mg/kg 0013 Ol 101.0% 15.3% 94.8% 11/24/04 • MDL=Minimum Detection Limit LCS=Percent recovery of known standard RPD=Relative percent deviation of duplicate sample (A-B x 100) (A+B)x(1/2) The information contained in this report is, to the best of/my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: • PENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569•Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: October 25, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION 14:M-MA034 LABORATORY REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Soil Pile Soil Pile Sample From: Day#I Day#2 Sample 1D#: 4009022 4009028 Method # Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cadmium mg/kg 20 .45 200.7 10/25/04 Chromium mg/kg 15.5 16.3 200.7 10/25/04 Lead mg/kg 143 197 220.1 10/25/04 • Lead mg/1 TCLP .080 .180 10/25/04 Sampled By: B. Poole Sampled On: 09/07/04 Sample Received: 09/07/04 This information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete./ Date: Laboratory Director: • P)ENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 848 u Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569•Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: October 25, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION 4:M-MA034 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ QA/QC LABORATORY REPORT FORM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blank DZDL LCS RPD Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cadmium mg/kg 0.002 0.005 89.0% 13.1% 10/14/04 Chromium mg/kg 0.01 01 92.1% 8.9% 10/23/04 Lead mg/kg .01 .01 114% 82.0% 10/23/04 MDL=Minimum Detection Limit LCS=Percent recovery of known standard RPD=Relative percent deviation of duplicate sample (A--B hxf 10 0) (A+B)x(1/2) The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: ` Laboratory Director: P)ENGINEERING ® TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569•Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: October 25, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION 4:M-MA034 ----------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- LABORATORY REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Soil Pile Soil Pile Sample From: Day#1 Day#2 Sample ID#: 4009022 4009028 Method # Date ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pH 7.14 7.99 150.1 10/14/04 Sulfide mg/kg 36.2 17.6 375.4 10/23/04 Cyanide mg/kg 15.3 19.7 412B 10/23/04 * Non reactive Sampled By: B. Poole Sampled On: 09/07-08/04 Sample Received: 09/07-08/04 This information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: PENGINEERING • TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 848•Salem, Massachusetts 01970•Telephone: 978-745-4569 m Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: October 25, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION #:M-MA034 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ QA/QC LABORATORY REPORT FORM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blank MDL LCS RPD Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ pH mg/kg 0.02 0.05 101.6% 0% 10/14/04 Sulfide mg/kg 0.68 10 103% 2.53% 10/23/04 Cyanide mg/kg .474 1 98.0% 0.65% 10/23/04 MDL=Minimum Detection Limit LCS=Percent recovery of known standard RPD=Relative percent deviation of duplicate sample (A-B LxLl00 (A+B)x(1/2) The information contained in this report is, to thebestof my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: SP, INC 45 Congress Street - P.O. Box 848 Salem, MA 01970 (978) 745-4569 - (978) 745-4881 ��n �'` � `• �� J l tH� IV,Q��,IJST�OUY RECORD Project No.: Project vne: // N`Jo. of Containers 'ANALYSIS REMARKS Jd C-. " ;nuplers: (Signature): _ �J S(FA/�Ne. DATE TIME COMP GRAB SI' TIO LOCA TION 0 7 IJ d / O'"�.. C �a y� 1 � - `J (7 � 76 C X _ 19% la 5 c. f- As RelingL ed bVignat e): Dog Ti Received by: (Signature): Date ( Time Remarks: Relinquished by: (Signature): Date Time Received by: (Signature): Date Time --.___._ Relinquished by: (Signature): Date Time Received by (Signature). Date Time • • � �i � • SP, INC Vi r 45 4 Congress Street - P.O. Box 848 Salem, MA 01970 RA (978)) 7445--45569 - (978) 745-4881 C1�11USTODY RECORD Project No.: Proje t N lie, No. of Containers ANALYSIS REMARKS 'amplcrs (Sigualure):_ ,- - C= STA Nu. DATE 'DIME COMP IGRAH STA"CION LOCATION O cT 1 `i' tP c SSG ztZ - �f., Z 1101 /r A/4 Vooyrt - -n e .s Relinquishs$by: gnatu e): l ata ( Time. Receive y. (Signature): Date Time Remarks: til f Relinquished by: (Signature): Da e 1 Time Received by: (Signature): Date i Time Relinquished by: (Signature): Date Time Received by (Signature): Date 1 Time New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP VPH Analytical Report SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information AM'Nlatri`x = _„, ❑O Aqueous ❑ Soil [] Sediment ❑ Other: I Project# Containers_7 0 Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: I Close Cousins Realty Trust Aqueous(acid preserved) ❑ N/A 0 pH <2 ❑ pH >2 Comment: Sample Aqueous(TSP preserved) O N/A ❑ pH < 11 ❑ pH > 11 Comment: ml McOH P,eservativ s Soil or ❑ N/A ❑ Samples NOT preserved in McOH or air-tight containers ❑ 1:1+25% r -' Sediment ❑ Samples received in McOH ❑ Covering soil/sediment ❑ Not covering soil/sediment ❑ Other Temperature Z Received on ice O Received at 4° C t 2° C ❑ Other:_ °C VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: SP, Inc. Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 03-1 WON llent`tD:=,` 4i Well`#3 Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP VPH ftmgm4La 11D:,:,1412042 412)43 412044 DateCallecfed � 12/09/04 12/09/04 12109/04x; VPH Surrogate Standards: „,' =Date�Recelved: ,12/09/04 ;,: i2/Q94041-A , "rlvb'd104* a MS: BFB rr Date1Pr2served=;„ 12109104,;, 12/09/04 , s 12/09/g4 ie 0 ied 2/ MS: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (1,4-DCB-d4) QaAnit 113/04 t2F13/04 �y "12/13/04f. ,_ O'Moisture = y`s� _ INS Range/Target'Anel to , :Erut Range`*:RL*(mg/L)€0, not, is :;�� ;, a f; x M, <'t fJnadjustedCyCaAliptatics N/A 0.200 mg/L ND ND ND Unad)usted:j e CtzAli phatics N/A 0.500 mg/L ND ND ND 1Benzene` mis, a'*” t"#,( .�' C5-C8Alipn 0.0005 mg/L ND ND ND th�Ibe,ieineE, ffl�„+,,r -r c9-Cl2Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND ND ND Methyl-tert;hutyl ether C5-C8Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND ND 0.002 'Naphthalene 5! N/A 1 0.0005 mg/L 0.001 0.003 ND Toluene +,, 'a p c5-C8 Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND ND ND &'p`=Xylenes'"" "` =� c9-c12 Alipn 0.0005 mg/L ND ND ND 1WFb-'Xy,iPneWra%-Mr, ° a . ;c9-C12Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND ND ND CS.CgAllphatloHydrocarbonsNFA (1200mg/L '., ND ND ND C9 C Z Ahptaatic Hydrocarbons 1N/A � 0 300; mg/L , ND ND ND C9 C1e Arornat%c Hydrocarbons A ¢+ N/A ,0 100 � mUIV ND 0.129 ND BF&'Surrogete,%'Recavery. 100% 100% 101% 1;4-DCB=d;Surrogate°lo Recovery 98% 97% 96% Surrogate Acceptance::RangE�, :r 70-130% 70-130% 70-130% 'Hydrocarbon Range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. ZC,.Ce Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range 3Co.C12Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes AND CB-CioAromatic Hydrocarbons eluting in that range "Only applies to samples collected in air-tight containers Aliphatic and Aromatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS. I attestunder the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immedately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete. r Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 12/14/2004 f New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP VPH Analytical Report • SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information Make 19 Aqueous ❑Soil ❑Sediment [] Other Project# Gontatners ` O Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking Location: Close Cousins Realty Trust .;,Aqueous(acid preserved) ❑ N/A O pH <2 ❑ pH>2.Comment: .._;f:.......:.. Aqueous( SPpreserved) O N/A ❑pH < 11 ❑ pH> 11 Comment: ml McOH ........................... ............................ Preserua.Ytves Soil or ❑ N/A ❑Samples NOT preserved in McOH or air-tight containers ❑ 1:1+25% ..,,.___._.„j:.,.,,,,;•: Sediment ❑ Samples received in McOH ElCovering soft/sedimentElNot covering soil/sediment ❑ Other ........................... ............................ ........................... Temparaturer D Received on ice O Received at 4° C ±2° C ❑ Other: °C VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: SP, Inc. Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 03-1 Cfientlt) We11#4 Method for Target Analytes: MA DEP VPH tab 11# 41204f' Dafe£ollecteeE 12109104 VPH Surrogate Standards: hate Receives€: 12104104 MS: BFB bateFreservetl. 12109!04 MS: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (1,4-DCB-d4) Date Analyzed; 12133104 t7iluti©ft tractor; 1.T) Mvtsturel. Rar1 e1Tar et Atrai:`: a E(�t, Range »L mglt-3 Usrits : UtiadjusCed C5-1Ca/liphetics N/A 0.200 mg/L ND I1nadlusted CvkzA7hetics N/A 0.500 mg/L ND Benterre C5-C8Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND Eth iberoehecs-c12 Aliph 0.0005 m /L 0.007 Methyl-tent btf I ether C5-C8 Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND M1fa htha#ene N/A 0.0005 m /L 0.019 3vlUene; C5-C8Alipn 0.0005 mg/L ND ttr & X: ferrel C9-C12Aliph 0.0005 mg/L ND o X leve' Cs-C12 Alipn 0.0005 mg/L ND £ C$Aliphatic Hyflrvcarbvns : NiA 0 20lS frrglL :! ND CazAllp#.4lc Hytiracaf6©ns: CTIA 0 5flt# rttg/L ND £ C10 Aromatic Hydrvcarbotls. N!A 0 1A4 faglL ND BFB SUCrb ate%a F ecotle 100% DSurrogate'%Res©very C&iia 90% Slarry ale face tan.ce Tian 70-130% 'Hydrocarbon Range data excludes concentrations of any surrogate(s)and/or internal standards eluting in that range. 2CsC°Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range 3CgC12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes AND C,C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons eluting in that range °Only applies to samples collected in air-tight containers Aliphatic and Aromatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS. • 1 attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immedately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete. Electronically signed and approved by: Mr. Bruce A. Bornstein, Lab Director DATE: 12/14/2004 New England ChromaChem, Inc. MA DEP EPH Analytical Report .SAMPLE INFORMATION Miscellaneous Sample Information Matrix O Aqueous ❑ Soil ❑ Sediment ❑ Other jProject# 412016 Containers 9 Satisfactory ❑ Broken ❑ Leaking ILocation7 Close Cousins Realty Trust Aqueous Preservatives 1 ❑ N/A ❑ pH <2 ❑ pH >2 Comment: Temperature I Z Received on ice O Received at 4' C ❑ Other EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client: SP, Inc. Method for Ranges: MA DEP EPH Client ID: Well#2 Well#4 Method for,TargetAnalytes: MA DEP EPH Lab ID: 412043 412045 Date Collected: 12/9/2004 12/9/2004 EPH Surrogates Date Thawed: N/A N/A Aliphatic: chloro-octadecane (COD) Date Received: 12/9/2004 12/9/2004 Aromatic: Ortho-terphenyl (OTP) Date Extracted: 12/10/2004 12/10/2004 EPH Fractionation Surrogates Date Analyzed: 12/10/2004 12/10/2004 1. 2-Fluorobiphenyl Time Analyzed: 18:36 19:09 2. 2-Bromonaphthalene Dilution Factor: 1.0 1.0 % Solid(soil) Range/Target Analyte RL(mg/L) Units Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics 0.100 mg/L 1.40 0.689 Naphthalene 0.002 mg/L 1 0.005 0.022 Diesel PAH 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Analytes Phenanthrene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Acenaphthene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Acenaphthalene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Anthracene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Benzo(A)Anthracene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Benzo(A)Pyrene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Benzo(B)Fluoranthene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Benzo(G,H,I)Perylene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Other Benzo(K)Fluoranthene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Target PAH Chrysene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Analytes Dibenzo(A,H)Anthracene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Fluoranthene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Fluorene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 0.002 mg/L ND ND Pyrene 0.002 mg/L ND ND C9 CWAliphatic'Hyd --carbons 'r§ Qm ;9tl50q 5 mg/LMOV90044 Qd C_is-Css`Aliphattc Fiydroca'rboiis, f 2.0 mg/L " ND ,,,; - _ C1'1c22"Aromatic Hydiocairbons t € r QI Wr m fC iE39,�r ;a _ 9 baa_ 4 667= WARV a Aliphatic $urrogate%"Recove83% 85% A�omatie.Surrogate %`Recovery _ , _ 94% 88% . Sample Surrogate'Acceptance;Ran a e.. , � , ; E„x'40=t40%, 4Q y40%, 40 14t)% t X46-140°fu x Frastionatioh,Surrogate(1)-%:'RecoveryZ.w.r ;ftqpzq°'. 5r Ott '__1 91% 95% ;Fractionation Surrogate (2).%'RecoveryoyiPftm 87% 112% Fractionation'Siirro'ate`Acce tante Ran=e .r. ';4( Bill INC lll►, •INAf Nlt111lnIA ulvyu c G6CilA1N Ute cuh-l-om, ltli rMll) '?i' ."e k . 140jhcl No.: i'rtt}rct IVnntr• s� t�ti ' : 1jtCttltttti+tete) tV AAt,1'St5ttt,ttlrlltfCB— _ � C1ln sE, Cu>,�t r s tiea�d� �^Lc ' 4ith1� cll: lS gitnttttol:__ �� y �„ • a s d. IAIP. libik t`unll_Jul An s I uN LuCA11u.N _ y ) �.Ct1a. 1 �� .p�.��T.. - �t21`% °` t•i vz 2 G _ �S _S 7 l7 71117 �...— —1 ' _.�._ �.__ �I ( ,p �f �% /♦ � � �`{!li .C.LY CX.W Lay �'.� , � r t _ leStl�ulsl}d y: ( tlalule � Hold 16dd Ileciw Y:191VIfchilb : Uatd 16ne fle,hatk thiml s id by:Isipt—' ,aF-7— t)nfe h a galltidilsi✓i i,y:lSipgawel: Uala ! 2LuA —_ Ileebivelt,y: ISlllaaftAB): tHtd ( iltne [PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: November 5, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 Day I 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION#:M-MA034 LABORATORY REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Remaining Soil Remaining Soil Remaining Soil Sample From: North Sidewall,4-8' East Sidewall, 4-6' South Sidewall, 4-8' Sample ID#: 0409017 0409018 0409019 Method # Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cadmium mg/kg .081 .129 .092 200.7 11/04/04 Chromium mg/kg 48.5 32.6 75.7 200.7 11/04/04 • Lead mg/kg 34.6 28.6 33.0 220.1 11/03/04 Sampled By: B. Poole Sampled On: 09/07/04 Sample Received: 09/07/04 This information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. i/15.10� � pr�� Date: Laboratory Director: • I� ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: November 5, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 Day I 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION #:M-MA034 LABORATORY REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sample Type: Remaining Soil Remaining Soil Soil Sample From: West Sidewall, 4-8' Bottom Excavation, 8' Pile, Day I Sample ID#: 0409020 0409021 0409022 Method#Date ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cadmium mg/kg .041 .018 .035 200.7 11/04/04 Chromium mg/kg 122 20.8 151 200.7 11/04/04 • Lead mg/kg 35.0 16.3 143 220.1 11/03/04 Sampled By: B. Poole Sampled On: 09/07/04 Sample Received: 09/07/04 This information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. ZAg ti s Date: Laboratory Director: • • aF)ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: November 5, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 Day II 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION#:M-MA034 -------------------------------------------------------- LABORATORY REPORT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Remaining Soil Remaining Soil Remaining Soil Sample From: North Sidewall,8-12' East Sidewall,8-12' South Sidewall,8-12' Sample ID#: 0409023 0409024 0409025 Method # Date ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cadmium mg/kg .043 .14 .102 200.7 11/04/04 Chromium mg/kg 17.6 21.1 14.4 200.7 11/04/04 Lead mg/kg 46.8 80.2 35.8 220.1 11/03/04 • Sampled By: B. Poole Sampled On: 09/08/04 Sample Received: 09/08/04 This information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge e accurate and complete. i1 /ar/Oq &,- ,,� Date: Laboratory Director: • :PENGINEERING, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: November 5 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 Day Il 9 Webb Street, Salem, MA LAB CERTIFICATION#:M-MA034 LABORATORY REPORT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sample Type: Remaining Soil Remaining Soil Soil Sample From: West Sidewall,8-12' Bottom Excavation,12' Pile, Day II Sample ID#: 0409026 0409027 0409028 Method # Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cadmium mg/kg .175 .070 .15 200.7 11/04/04 Chromium mg/kg 14.8 7.94 16.6 200.7 11/04/04 • Lead mg/kg 42.7 3.76 197 220.1 .11/03/04 Sampled By: B. Poole Sampled On: 09/08/04 Sample Received: 09/08/04 This information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. n / %cy Date: Laboratory Director: • [PIENGINEERiNG, INC. P.O. Box 848 • Salem, Massachusetts 01970 •Telephone: 978-745-4569 • Fax: 978-745-4881 Client: Former Richard Leather Date: November 5, 2004 9 Webb Street Salem, MA 01970 9 Webb Street, Salem,MA LAB CERTIFICATION 4:M-MA034 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ QA/QC LABORATORY REPORT FORM Blank MDL LCS RPD MS Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cadmium mg/kg 0.0018 0.01 92.4% 8.27% 90.3% 11/04/04 Chromium mg/kg 0.0013 .01 127% 1.25% 104% 11/04/04 Lead mg/kg .002 .01 96.7% .58% 102% 11/03/04 • MDL=Minimum Detection Limit LCS=Percent recovery of known standard RPD=Relative percent deviation of duplicate sample MS = Percent recovery of Matrix Spike (A-B)x(100) (A+B)x(1/2) The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge accurate and complete. Date: Laboratory Director: • r Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Quality Asbestos Notice of Noncompliance Enforcement Notice: M.G.L. c. 21A sec. 16 and 310 CMR 7.15 FNON General (Information Note: Site or yrsiolalCrtiBVCt`a: �_� t✓O rim A Copy of this form �f� _1LtY2 V r will be mailed to the Name - permitteelowner. Com �+ �L ,ro� Add ✓2 . ..rte/,—p^-�- v-�— . ___..._. .._ I vn_ s SGC zip code ✓t IS C' i,a -i.i✓t ... __ tarutt€b jib -..: '7�lY�V` Conrad Person Name rlrk CalectPenion Ph"Numtw ladve gAaa Cc& Responsible Party, r1r115 . _nae! Dy prtn Zhviro r� S�ySG lleP3 ._ vot�Ewta "L_ Cama&, Not iue.��ra �. aN� _ L ',l SlpwtunirowiadgesrerelMart n 7 P4motah lift �l Code 9r - relepAone NNufterindidingArn Code PtroxNumberAxhaArrg a! l7u— By:"nd ❑ Mail Description of Violations under M.G.L. c.111 sec. 142A 1142J On_ .. C _ / �EP personnel observed the following iolations at tlfe facility: 10 Cpvp, s_44 aII _t6r, `� tc�, tv{ : ret rY�£A( q�cl f+d�h Wit�n f days: correct vrolation; submitGp1/an' Within days: C!cornet violation; ❑su}b�mit�rlap' UP e"710 CAQR 7,rS` O)te,) ❑ �cir�t,ry�4. � C3Sc? �Ps�+C='�•sp�i;� __ Within days: O correct vitiation; O submit plan' Within days: ❑correct violation; O submitplan' ❑ ❑ CC; Within days: O correct violation; O submit plan' Within days: O correct violation; ❑submit plan' BaadaNeNm nFPns�iapl Ererrr�r Important Information Please read caretully. This is an important notice with potential legal consequences: DEP Office olEnramemmenl An administrative penalty may be assessed for every day from now on that you are in noncompliance with the requirements described in this NON.Notwithstanding this NON,the Department reserves the right to exercise the full extent of its legal authority aawwien Asss a in order to obtain full compliance with all applicable requirements including;without limitation,criminal prosecution,civil action, QQ a l 3 including court-imposed civil penalties,or administrative penalties assessed by the Department: v ! •Following this inspection and within the deadiine(s)establish in section B you shall either:a)correct all violations or b) .T45 61 q submit a written proposal foronto compliance.Within /;- ays following this FIELD NON inspection,submit confirma- tion in writing to the_ =XRe R�e,Qiopal Office that you a corrected the above io'lations,if y�y?have any questions about this FIELD NON please contact _ Y.Oh1 r1 aC. /♦1Jk�/ of the ! sXegional Office at (q) 6,10 l- %J;3 The regional office addresses are lists on the back for your convenience. Gw 4ms ......» .. �.. .._...-___..,..:- _..e--_--",.._....:.,__r......,. veu mu.nrn o:uv.u........,,m......:u..,m,...,e• n.__ r s 1 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Quality Asbestos Notice of Noncompliance M.d t. c. 21A sec. 16 and 310 CMR 7.15 ' Additional Requirements Note: contain D' contains a list of 0 310 CMR 7.15(1)(a)Applicability: Caused,suffered, ■ 310 CMR 7.15(1)(d)Air Cleaning: possible viola- allowed or permitted the`demolition/renovation,installa- • Failure to utilize air cleaning devices tions for inclusion tion,reinstallation, handling,transporting,storage or • Failure to utilize a HEPA unit with clean filters in a field NON. disposal of asbestos containing material or asbestos • Failure to utilize a HEPA unit with audible alarm Section 9 lists containing waste in a manner that caused or contributed to only those a condition of air pollution. m. 310 CMR 7.15(1)(e)Waste Disposal: requirements in • Failure to label/Seal containers used for storage/disposal which the entity is 0 310 CRM 7.15(1)(b) Notification: Failure to notify the of ACM currently in Department of an asbestos removal as required by the • Containerization of dry and/or inadequate wet ACM violation. regulations. • Disposal of ACM at an unapproved site • No Notification Failure to use leak tight containers for storageldisposal • Incomplete Notification of ACM • Notification not received at least 10 working days.prior • Storage of ACM at an unapproved site/transfer station to commencing work • Failure to'seal into feak-tight,asbestos disposal • Failure to notify of changes in project start-and/or container end-date ACTIONS TO BETAKEN: ■ 310 CMR 7.09(1)Dust,Odor,Construction and Demoli- tion:Operations were observed which generated dust or 1. Respond to the Department in writing,within ten(10)days odor(s)which caused or contributed to a condition of air of the issue date of this Notice of Noncompliance,as to the pollution reasons for the violations and what measures will be taken to prevent,such violations from recurring in the future. ■ 310 CMR 7.09 Notification:Failure to notify the Depart- ment of construction or demolition as required by the 2. Institute proper management oversite to prevent future regulations. violations of this nature. • No notification • Incomplete Notification 3. Ensure compliance with all applicable State and Federal • Notification not received at least 10 working days prior regulations governing asbestos removal notifications, to commencing work removal and handling:procedures. • Failure to notify of changes in project start-and/or end-date ■ 310 CMR 7.15(1)(c) Procedures for Asbestos Emission Control: • Dry/Inadequate wetting of ACM during removal • Failure to remove ACM prior to demolition/renovation • Failure to seal work area • Failure to use air filtration • Failure to ensure ACM remains wet LJ Contact Information DEP Boston DEP Southeast Region DEP Millbury Training Center One Winter Street 20 Riverside Drive Water Pollution Control Technical Boston, MA 02108 Lakeville, MA 02347 Assistance Telephone: 617-292-5500 Telephone:508-946-2700 Route 20 Fax: 617-556-1049 Fax: 508-947-6557 Millbury, MA 01527 Telephone:508-756-7281 DEP Western Region DEP Northeast Region Fax:508-755-9253 436 Dwight Street 10 Commerce Way Springfield, MA 01103 Woburn, MA 01801 MA Office of Technical Assistance Telephone:413-784-1100 Telephone:617-932-7600 100 Cambridge Street,Suite 2109 Fax:413-784-1149 Fax: 617-932-7615 Boston,MA 02202 Telephone:617-727.3260 DEP Central Region Fax:617-727-3827 75 Grove Street Worcester, MA 01605 Telephone: 508-792-7650 Fax: 508.792.7621 nnv NraS AUG, 1. 2000 3:30PM BETAENGINEERING N0. 8990 P. 2 C o s T a L L E o 18 M A N T L I N G C o , . I N C , REVISED August 1,2000 Original (June 6,2000) ATTN. WNW Us= P: 401-333-2382 Beta Engineering F: 401-333-9225 6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln,Ma. 02865 FROM Daniel T. Costello P' 508446.0880 Costello Dismantling Co, Inc. F: $08-947-3093 2 Rocky Outter St. Msddleboro,Ma. 02346 Project: Richards Leather Salem,Ma. PROPOSAL Costello Dismantling Company Inc. is pleased to provide a quotation for the Demolition services required for the above project in Salem,Ma. We will supply all labor,materials, equipment and insurance to fully and finally complete the work as specified in the demolition specification section with the conditions as noted in this proposal. We are fully insured for 510,000,000.00 of General Liability coverage. Our concern Por safety extends to every aspect of our company as we rely heavily on out excavators which are equipped with a variety of attachments. All of our labor force have been certified with 40 hour OSHA training and OSHA Competent Person training 29 CFR 1926.All salvage shall be credited to Costello Dismantling Co.,Inc We have visited the sift and are aware of the current access conditions. Our scope of worst will include the followiagr. 1. Prepare Demolition Plan and Schedule 2. Assist with all state and local permits required for start up. 3. Ensure safe passage of people around demolition area 4• Remove the brick chimney down to grade, foundations 2 feat below grade, 5. Selectively dismantle a three story wood building formally used as a leather processing building. 6. Completely remove the concrete slab on grade. 7. Remove foundations walls down to 2 foot below grade. 8. Ali concrete will be oxvshed on site and will be graded on site. 9. Remove and legally dispose of all demolition debris at an offsite location 10. Any steel components coated with lead-based paint are exempt from the general hazardous waste recycling rules when they are handled as salvage scrap metal eventually recycled to a smelter. i R e c K + O Y T T t A S T " R R T M , O R L 5 9 0 0 0 , M n : 8 A C % V R It T T 5 O a 3 A R 9 0 0 9 a O M 0 9 I ' K 11u 0 . O R f • U 5 A lI r A ¢ e, 0 a a A 7 g 0 " A 10 3Wd cn-gIsm 860EtD699SI L9:91 seez/10/96 AUG, 1, ZUUU J:3UKM tlh'1A8Nlr1WK1W' NU, 689U f. J COSTELLO DISMANTLING PROPOSAL Richards Leather PAGE 2 11, Sufficiently wet construction materials during our operations to reduce dust, if required. This Proposal DOES NOT INCLUDE- a) Any handling or disposal of any hazardous materials(asbestos, lead paint,Oils,PCBs, contaminated soils,etc.). b) Any utility pipe removal,relocation, or capping. c) Any excavation,backfill, compaction,earthwork,loaming, or seeding. d) Any now paving,grading,or site improvements other than using the crushed concrete. e) Any new fencing or barricades. f) Any concrete sawcutting or core drilling. S) Any local fire or police department details. b) Any new oonstruction. i) Any electrical pole removal or relocation. Beta Engineering or Owner shall; 1. Provide continuous acoess to the jobsite for equipment access, container loading,and emergency egress. 2, Pay for all demolition permits and all other local approvals for start-up. 3. Disconnect,relocate and cap utilities. 4. Identify and locate on available plans and in the field, any underground piping which may remain. b. Locate and maintain active hydrant for dust control and fm suppression. Detailed Cost Proposal BUILDING DEMOLITION............$154,0 00 i (One Han4red Fifty-Four Thousand Dollars) ASBESTOS ABATEMENT..............T 80,800.00 (Eighty Tbousaad Dollars) COSTELLO DISMANTLING CO.,DIC. U OTML500 £60ELP6802T L0=9T 0901/10!00 AUG 11 2000 1434 FR DCPO—CONST SERV 617 727 4043 TO 819787409846 P.01/13 Ale le" n "W'4WA tyaabacrc"bea (F"M&oCAawdX ty U&n4fWhVd 6� r� lmz 9'laccr ' Baslmy �loaaa�aaeHo O,��oe ARGEO PAOL CELLUCCI STEPHEN R CROSBY GOO RNOR A06 (6!7) yAr-9050 SECRETAFMADMINISTRATION JANE SWIFT 9= (047) 727-ON d FINANCE LIEUTENAMODYERhgR -' DAVID B.PERINI FAX IRANSMISSION SHEET COMMISSMER DATE: August 11, 2000 T0: Peter Strout Building.Cpm raissioner FAX k (978)740-9846 FROM: George M.Matthews PHONE#: (978) 745-9595 x385 Associate General Counsel Number of Pages:,*3 (including cover sheet) Comments: Emergency Wuiver of Advertising Requirements Richard Leather Building 1.11 Cousins Street Salem.MA,Demolition of Blde As requested is an assigned emergency waiver number concerning the above mentioned matter. If I can be of$other assistance do not hesitate to contact me. :R##r»r»####W»»rr+rrr#WrwWrt#w+#+r++r+rrr#Wrtwww#w++++++r++WR»W»Wrrw#+++»W+Ww»Wr+#»»WWWrrW»» The documents accompanying this facsimile transmission contain information from the Division of Capital Asset Management which may be confidential and/or privileged, The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you arc not.tbe intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited.If you have received this facsimile in error,please notify us by telephone immediately: Thank you. #»#####4rt#»»fr#»RRR#R»#fr#»»####r*rr»»#rry»rtwRri#RRRr R#WwWrtrtWWWWW»»riR+i#Wrt»#rt##i#iR###ir# a AUG;.10-00 04 :39 PM SALEM $UIt_DING DEP 978 740 9848 P. 02 I.Citp of 6alem, fiaaarbuatto public propertp 32epartment Auilbing Mepartment One Oalem Oreen (078) 7459393 txi. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. George Mathews Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance 1 Ashburton Place Room 1505 Boston,Ma. 42108 Dear Mr.Mathew's; As per our conversation today relative to the"Richard Leather Building" at 1-11 Cousins St. in Salem. After numerous complaints from neighbors concerned about the condition of the above mentioned building and a structural report that states the need for extensive Structural repairs, the City Of Salem and the building department conducted a board of survey in accordance with the Mass. Building code and found the building to be in serious condition. At that time I invoked 780 CMR 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe. As the code reads the owner has the ability to make the building safe or remove the structure, this did not happen. At this point the City Of Salem has the right to . retain a demolition firm and remove the building. Enclosed you will find some of the pertinent correspondence we have had with the owners. This is a serious condition and needs to be dealt with immediately; Sincerely Emergency Waiver of advertising *eteWrut requirements tinder MGL c.149 sec.44J (b) is hereby granted on Building Commissioner ,this� day of ' �u�,� . �orge M. Matthews Associate General Counsel Emergency Waiver No.