Loading...
155 WASHINGTON STREET - CENTRAL HOUSE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL - BUILDING INSPECTION � �_ / � 1 r �= - G�NT�,�-C... - ��� !S� ti//'SN"�u �s�, s �-_ - .� - � :i OPECHEE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Controlled Construction Progress Report January 13, 2009 Re: Site Inspection for Washington at Derby 155 Washington Street Salem,Massachusetts Building Permit No. 964-08 As the Architect of record, I conducted a site visit on January 13,2009 for the above referenced Project as required by the Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR Section 116.2.2. I have reviewed the progress and the quality of the work as it relates to the design intent and to the best of my knowledge the current work is generally consistent with the construction documents and is in compliance with applicable codes and regulations. Ron Lamarre A.,n 2009.01.13 15:03:21 -05'00' Ron Lamarre Architect-Registration No. 10002 Observations and comments: 1. National Grid is on-site reviewing&approving the electrical transformer for energizing the building. 2. Sidewalks have been installed. Paving of the parking areas is complete. 3. Stair No. I and 2 are installed with inside guardrails and being used for construction to the fourth floor. 4. Roof top HVAC units are operational and providing heat to the 2"d, 3`a and 4" floors. 5. Temporary enclosures have been installed to hold heat within the building for finishes to begin. 6. Masonry along all elevations is relatively complete,minor detailing is being completed. 7. Exterior wall framing is being completed; first floor area is the only remaining work. 8. Exterior siding and trim is mostly complete on all elevations; a small amount of work and final detailing is on-going. 9. Window installation is mostly complete on 2"d, 3`a, and 4t'floors; a small amount of detailing remains. All interior window perimeters have been sealed with low-expanding foam. 10. Insulating of the exterior walls and vapor barrier installation is complete on the 4`h floor; work continues on the 2"d and 3`d floors. 11. Gypsum wall board work is on-going on the 4"and 3`d floors. 12. Prime paint(walls)and prime/finish paint(ceiling) is on-going on the 4t'floor. 13. Elevator rails have been installed and machine parts have been placed in the machine room. 14. CPVC sprinkler mains and branch piping is nearly complete on 2"a, 3`d, and 4`"floors. 15. HVAC ductwork is nearly complete on 2"d, 3`d, and 4a' floors. 16. Plumbing rough-in work on-going on 2"d, 3`d, and 4'h; tub installations along with water/drain pipe runs. 17. Electrical rough-in is complete on 2"a 3 and 4" floors. End of Progress Report. 11 CORPORATE. DRIVE, nE.LNIONT. Nil 03720 PHONE (603) 527-9090 FAX (603) 517-9191 ZIW2IHd DNIC[Ilflg W H IV S d0 AID pv 3AOiA . V mism OPECHEE ID CONSI 14UC'I'.[ON COHI'ORA'1'ION Controlled Construction Progress Report December 03, 2008 Re: Site Inspection for Washington at Derby 155 Washington Street Salem,Massachusetts Building Permit No. 964-08 As the Architect of record,I conducted a site visit on December 03, 2008 for the above referenced Project as required by the Massachusetts State Building Code 780 CMR Section 116.2.2. I have reviewed the progress and the quality of the work as it relates to the design intent and to the best of my knowledge the current work is generally consistent with the construction documents and is in compliance with applicable codes and regulations. Ron L filen 2008.12.0512.05 09:29:38-05'00' Ron Lamarre Architect-Registration No. 10002 Observations and comments: 1. Sewer connection work is on-going in Front Street. 2. Water and Gas connections are complete. 3. Stair No. 1 and 2 are installed with inside guardrails and being used for construction to the fourth floor. 4. A small number of roof top units have been turned-on to provide heat on the 3`d and 4"' floors 5. Temporary enclosures have been installed to hold heat within the building for finishes to begin 6. Masonry along all elevations is relatively complete, minor detailing is being completed. 7. Exterior wall framing is being completed; first floor area is the only remaining work. 8. Final detailing is being completed on continuous foam board insulation,Tyvek air barrier, and waterproofing tape around 1"floor fenestrations and cornice. 9. Exterior siding and trim is on-going on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4"' floors of all elevations; minor detailing being completed. 10. Garage doors have been installed. 11. Window installation is nearly complete on 2"d, 3`d, and 4" floors. 12. Insulating of the exterior walls has begun, along with the vapor barrier is almost complete on the 3" and 4th floors; gypsum wall board work is on-going. Exterior wall insulation is on-going on the 2"d floor. 13. CPVC sprinkler mains and branch piping is nearly complete on 2"d, 3`d, and 4" floors. 14. HVAC ductwork is nearly complete on 2nd, 3rd, and 4"floors. 15. Plumbing rough-in work on-going on 2"d, 3`d, and 4"; tub installations along with water/drain pipe runs. 16. Electrical rough-in is complete on 2"d,3`d, and 4" floors. End of Progress Report. 11 C0RV0RATL nitllF. RF,I,N10 N'r. Nil 03210 PHONE (603) 527-9090 FAX (6031 127-9191 WINTER STREET ARUHtTErJ r S FIELD OBSERVATION Observation Date: June 24,2008 REPORT # 3 Attention: Mike Bemler Page 1 of 1 Contractor: RCG Builders Project: 0265.001 Central House Location: 155.189 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 TRADES ON SITE: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Work in Progress: . Framing of floors and walls Estimated%of . 10%Framing Progress: Observations: Decided on location for mailboxes. • Determined location of sloped floor in corridor. • RCG has yet to determine Finish Floor Height Items to Verify: . Placement of townhouse interior stairs. • Head height for all stairs. • Finish Floor Height(From RCG) Action Items: Confirm that drawings contain updated sloped floor and mailbox locations, Attachments: 4 � Report by. Kathryn Giardi;Winter Street Architects, Inc Signature 209 Essex Street Suile 300 Salem, Msssachvsetts 0197o 979..7-04.7179 WINTER 'STREET ARCHITECTS FIELD OBSERVATION Observation Date: May 27,2008 REPORT # 2 Attention: Mike Bernier Page 1 of 1 Contractor: RGG Builders Project: 0265.001 Central House Location: 155-189 Washington Street, Salem,MA 01970 TRADES ON SITE; THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Work in Progress: Demolition Estimated%of 100%Demolition Progress: Observations: Size and locations of Floor joists. • Location of shear walls. • Maximum floor load above Edgewater Cafe. • Existing structure of 3b floor. • Leveling of floors. • Discussed acoustic strategy in regards to additional loads and spans with Ken Woods,PE Items to Verify: Acoustic treatment of walls and floors not above Edgewater Cafe. Action Items: . Feasibility of installing an acoustic ceiling in Edgewater Cafe. • Enclose egress stairs per building inspectors request. Attachments: Report by'. ' i l '.Kathryn Giardi;Winter Street Architects, Inc:Signature C 'lw�m t'tfl; ' 209 Essex Street Suite 3.00 Salem, Massac✓ vette 01970 976,74.4.7079 aCITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KIMBUIWBY DRISCOIJ. MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STRe.BT+ SN.EM,D'(ASSACHUSP_TTS 01970 Tea.:978-745-9595 4 FAX:978-740-9846 July 31, 2008 Mr. Kenneth Woods PE 18 Temple Street Newburyport, Ma 01950 RE: Central House 155 Washington Street Dear Mr. Woods Regarding your letter of July 21 regarding floor framing at the above project, please prepare a plan illustrating how you plan to reinforce the floor framing and a detail of the floor/ceiling assembly showing, sheathing, sound attenuation and finished floor. Sincerely, Thomas McGrath Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem 978-745-9595 x5644 cc: Mike Bemier 18 Temple Street Newburyport,MA 01950 Phone:978-985-6129 Kenneth • • • Fax:978-255-3555 July 21, 2008 Tom McGrath Salem Public Properties/Building Department 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem MA 01970 Phone: (978)745-9595 x5841 Re: Central House, 155 Washington Street, Salem, MA Ref: Structural capacity Mr. McGrath: I understand your office would like a letter speaking to the structural floor capacity of the referenced project- In particular the capacity of the second floor framing. The capacity of the existing steel framing is approximately 100 PSF. There are areas of existing wood framing that ultimately load that steel which do not have the capacity of 100 PSF at present. The required live loading for the proposed residential use is 40 PSF. The proposed dead load for the sound attenuation for the second floor added to the existing dead load is approximately 40 PSF total. It is my intention and the intention of the owner / builder to bring the whole second floor framing up to 80 PSF capacity minimum. This will be achieved by sistering the existing framing and/or adding supplemental framing between the existing framing. If you require any additional information please contact his office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, 0 Kenneth A. Woods i 1 r WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS June 3, 2008 Tom McGrath—Inspector of Buildings 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Central House First Floor Accessibility Dear Tom: A survey of the Central House First Floor has shown the following issues and our proposed resolutions: Edgewater Cafe: Add handrails to existing interior ramp. Entrance vestibule is too small, remove. Entry door is too small, replace with 36"door. Remove interior entrance ramp and widen the opening at the top of the existing ramp. Bathroom accessories(soap, paper towel dispenser, mirrors)are not accessible, relocate at correct height. Passage to India: Accessible as is. Sincerely, Winter Street Architects, Inc. Kathryn Giardi Designer 209 Essex Street Suite 300 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 976.744.7379 18 Temple Street Nexburyport,MA 01950 Phone:978-985-6129 Kenneth A. Woods RE Fax:978-255.3555 June 3, 2008 Tom McGrath Salem Public Properties/Building Department 120 Washington Street, 3"'Floor Salem MA 01970 Phone: (978)745-9595 x5641 Re: Central House, 155 Washington Street, Salem, MA Ref: 780 CMR 3408.0 Structural Requirements for Existing Buildings Gentlemen: I have visited the referenced site and have conducted a field investigation sufficient to determine location, size, details and conditions of the existing structural elements. The following report was prepared following the guidelines of 780 CMR Ch. 34 and Appendix F. The building's Seismic Hazard Exposure Group is I with a Seismic Performance Category of C (1612.0). The current Use Groups of the structure are F (Factory and Industrial) and B (Business)with a worse case Hazard Index of 3. The proposed Use Groups are B and R-2 with a Hazard Index of 2. The net change in Hazard Index is negative one which indicates that the requirements of 780 CMR 3404 and 780 CMR 3408 control the proposed construction. The cost of alterations requires the proposed construction to meet the requirements of Seismic Hazard Category 2(3408.1). Per 780 CMR 3408.21 have completed a structural analysis of the structural systems affected by the proposed alterations. The existing structure to remain, the modified structure and the complete structure as a whole has adequate capacity to support the required loads. Seismic Hazard Category 2 requires that the earthquake resistance of the existing building comply with the requirements of 780 CMR 3408,3.5 — specifically: alterations shall not be made to elements or systems reducing the lateral load resistance of the building. and 780 CMR 3408.6.3 Reduction of Earthquake Hazards. This specifically addresses unbraced parapets and unbraced masonry walls of which this building has neither. On the whole there are not many proposed structural alterations required in this adaptive re- use of the existing building. The architectural design has kept virtually all existing structure in place-ittle structural modification is required. Per 780 CMR 3408.5 the capacity of the existing structure is adequate to support the floor loads and wind loads as required in 780 CMR Chapter 16. Al Page 2 of 2 It is our professional opinion that the existing structure and the minor structural modifications required adequately meet the requirements of 780 CMR. In conclusion, I request this report suffice for the Chapter 34 structural evaluation requirements of 780 CMR 3408.2 and the requirements of the building permit submission. If further information is required please contact his office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, ���1N OF MgS,�cy 1��`I� KENNETH G A.WOODS c�.e STRUCTURAL m Na 39886 Kenneth A.Woods FSS/ONAL ENv Central House 1-May-08 Unit Sq Ft Assumptions 1 994 # Units 7 2 962 Gross Square Feet 3 1238 Net Square Feet 6,952 4 920. Construction $/NSF $ 107.88 5 1354 Building 6 809 7 675 Hall 708 Division Label 7660 Division 1 General Requirements $27,298 4% Division 2 Site Work/Demo $0 0% Division 3 Concrete $52,690 7% Division 4 Masonry $4,700 1% Divion 5 Metals $1,800 0% Division 6 Wood and Plastics $197,389 26% Division 7 Thermal/Moisture Protection $50,208 7% Division 8 Doors and Windows $57,256 8% Division 9 Finishes $106,478 14% Division 10 Construction Specialties $11,735 2% Division 11 Equipment $22,771 3% Division 12 Furnishings $49,549 7% Division 13 Special Construction Systems $1,200 0% Division 14 Conveying Systems $0 0% Division 15 Mechanical $120,305 16% Division 16 Electrical $46,620 6% Construction Subtotal $749,999 155 Washington $749,999 18 Temple Street Newburyport,MA 01950 Woods, • ' Phone:978-985-6129 " Fax:978-255-3555 May 27, 2008 Alex Schnip Washington at Derby LLC 120 Washington St Ste 202A Salem, MA 01970-3523 Re: 155 Washington Street, Salem, MA Structural Engineer of record (SER) Ref: Central House Alex: This letter is written to certify that I am the Structural Engineer of Record for the referenced project. If you need any additional information please contact this office at your earliest convenience. • Sincerely, OfMASWOODS SA � `o A UCTuFt $TR Na 39885 �O �Q Kenneth WoodsA99EOI3'T �FFSsinmM,�� CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number: 0265.000 Date: May 27, 2008 Project Title: Central House Project Location: 155-189 Washington Street, Salem, MA 01970 Name of Building: Central House Scope of Project: Exterior Restoration and Interior Renovation of Building IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 116.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUIDING CODE, I PAUL DURAND, MASS. REGISTRATION NO. 8615 BEING A REGISTERED ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: Entire Project Architectural X Structural Mechanical Electrical Fire Protection Other(specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND ALL APPLICABLE LAWS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 116.2.2. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required control materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix I. PURSUANT TO SECTION 116.4, 1 SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON C ETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTO + ION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. "d✓ 5 a; Signatu � R N DURAMD 8615of �, F• „nom SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF R 200 --, My commission Expires: �Nl Mry Publi i REGISTERED ARC JITT( TURA L AND ENG]NEI RING' 4FRVICF S CONSTRUC rI0N CONTROL AFFIDAVI F PROJECTINUMBER: -- PROJECTTITLE: I LL_ PROJECT LOCATION: NAME OF BUILDING SCOPE OF P ROJ ECT: 'OVA 1I In accordance With Section 116.0 of the Massachusetts State Builifinp Code,1, Mass. Registration No........�j11�,65 or directly supemsed the preparation ofall design plans,computations and spec ifiCiltions COnCenong; EXTIREPROJECT I II-I"ECTURAL tI STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL -FIRE PROTECTION FLECTRICAL ..-,......_6 TI I ER{s pLTi fv) For the above named project and that,to the bcsL of my knowledge,such plans,conlinlutions and Npccitications nuet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Codc. All acceptable engineering practices and ill applhcubla laws for the Proposed project. I furtherceitify that I shall peribialn,the necessary piofc,,ston2kcrNicc,and be prescin on the consiroution site on a rei-ailgr and periodic basis to determine that the work is procceding,in accordance.with the documents approver)for the building permit and shall be responsible for the following as spocified in section [16,2 1. Review,for conformance to the design concept, shop drawings,samples kind othertubminilIS which tile submitted be tile contractor in accordance with themciunencoas offfic unsiruct:_ ion docunienu, 2. Review and approval of the quality conuol procedurcs for all code-rNuired rraterials 3. Be present in intervals appropriate to the ma.,,Q oCconstruction to become,genet lily familiar with the peonies,and quality of the work and to determine, in general, if the work is being performed in a inannur consistent with the construction docurilonts. Pursuant to Section 116.4, 1 shall submit periodically,a piogress recon together with pertinent conuncrat,to the Building Departicent, Upon Con4fletion of the.Work. I shalt submit a final report is to the a,l1SfaL1%ry conpicli(tri-a I readiness or the proj ect fox occo pane y. Sign ams.......... o:3 Subscribed and sxvorR.4)nr this day of 106 My 0-nalusslon Ispr es a BLIC �,COIl1DIT� 4 YSpYE AO 1� CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT aCITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHING"I'ON$'1'R8E'1 * SALEM,IVL\SSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 May 29, 2008 Mr. Michael Bernier RCG By email RE: Plan Review for permit application for Central House Dear Mike I have reviewed the drawings submitted for permit on May 22 for the above project and have the following comments: 1. Section 3.3.3 of MAAB requires that the entire building (including fust floor tenant spaces) be brought up to full compliance with MAAB regulations. Please submit 1 of the following: a. Letter from the Architect stating that existing conditions meet MAAB regulations b. Plan describing alterations necessary for compliance c. Variance application to MAAB 2. Section 1014.9 of 780 CMR requires that common egress stairs be enclosed in a rated enclosure. Please submit amended plans. 3. Please submit a Structural Evaluation of the existing building as described in section 3408 of 780CMR and drawings detailing any reinforcements necessary to carry increased dead loads of second floor and necessary lateral reinforcement. 4. I have received controlled construction affidavits from the Structural Engineer and Architect Sincerely, Thomas McGrath Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem 978-745-9595 x5644 ` CITY OF SALEM s PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALEM,I IASSACHOSBTTS 01970 TFL:978-745-9595 ♦ RAX:978-740-9846 Metro-Swift METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. 58r PULASKI STREET PEABODY, MA 01960 978-532-2907 Job Name CENTRAL HOUSE LOFT Remote Area NFPA 13- 4 HEAD DESIGN Head Info 20x20 SPACING 22 GPM MIN, 10.2 PSI MIN ACTUAL MAX 148 SF Flows 342 GPM RQD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressures 68 PSI ROD AT TEST, 14 PSI SAFETY Data Fife CENTRAL.wx1 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 1 ZENTRAL HOUSE LOFT Date 052208 Hydraulic Desiqn Summary Sheet Name - CENTRAL HOUSE - LOFT RESIDENTIAL Remote Area - NFPA 13 - 4 HEAD DESIGN Head Information - 20x20 SPACING 22 GPM MIN, 10.2 PSI MIN ACTUAL MAX 148 SF Flow Information - 342 GPM RQD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressure Information - 68 PSI RQD AT TEST, 14 PSI SAFETY Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Water Supply Curve (C) METRO- SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 2 CENTRAL HOUSE LOFT Date 052208 Demand: City Water Supply: DemD1 - Elevation 16.025 C1 - Static Pressure 83 C2 - Residual Pressure: 79 D2 - System Flow 91.215 C2 - Residual Flow 1460 D2 - System Pressure 67.786 Hose ( Adj City ) Hose ( Demand ) 250 D3 - System Demand 341.215 Safety Margin 14.942 150 140 130 P 120 R 110 E 100 S 90 C1 C2 S 80 U 70 D2 R 60 D3 E 50 40 30 20 D 10 1 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW ( N ^ 1.85 ) Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure / Flow Summary - STANDARD METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 3 CENTRAL HOUSE LOFT Date 052208 Node Elevation K-Fact Pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual Req. D001 0.0 6.9 10.2 na 22.04 0.1 220 10.2 8 37.0 K=K@ EQ01 11.69 ne 22.04 7 37.0 K=K @ E001 12.51 ne 22.81 6 37.0 K= K@ EQ01 14.24 na 24.33 1 37.0 K=K@ EQ01 11.68 ne 22.04 2 37.0 12.54 na 3 37.0 13.49 na 4 37.0 15.82 na 5 37.0 23.15 na R3 34.0 37.24 na R2 22.0 45.72 na Rt 22.0 50.77 na CTE 22.0 53.04 na TOR -2.0 63.55 na BOR -9.0 66.63 na UG -9.0 71.64 na TEST 0.0 67.79 na 250.0 The maximum velocity is '19.18 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 4 and 5 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 4 CENTRAL HOUSE LOFT Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. ..C.. or Ftng's Pe Pv .... Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn D001 22.04 1.101 2E 7.65 1.000 10.200 K Factor= 6.90 to 150.0 1T 9.563 17.212 0.0 EQ01 22.04 0.0814 0.0 18.212 1.483 Vel = 7.43 0.0 22.04 11.683 K Factor= 6.45 8 22.04 1.101 IT 9.563 0.870 11.690 K Factor @ node EQOt to 150.0 0.0 9.562 0.0 2 22.04 0.0815 0.0 10.432 0.850 Vel = 7.43 0.0 22.04 12.540 K Factor= 6.22 7 22.81 1.101 1T 9.563 1.660 12.515 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 9.562 0-0 3 22.81 0.0867 0.0 11.222 0.973 Vel = 7.69 0.0 22.81 13.488 K Factor= 6.21 6 24.33 1.101 1E 3.825 12.417 14.236 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 3.825 0.0 4 24.33 0.0978 0.0 16.242 1.588 Vel = 8.20 0.0 24.33 15.824 K Factor= 6.12 1 22.04 1.101 1 E 3.825 6.700 11.683 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 3.825 0.0 2 22.04 0.0814 0.0 10.525 0.857 Vel = 7.43 2 22.04 1.394 0.0 10.200 12.540 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 44.08 0.0929 0.0 10.200 0.948 Vel= 9.27 3 22.81 1.394 1T 9.523 2.083 13.488 to 150.0 0.0 9.523 0.0 4 66.89 0.2013 0.0 11.606 2.336 Vel = 14.06 4 24.33 1.394 1 E 4.762 15.750 15.824 to 150.0 0.0 4.761 0.0 5 91.22 0.3572 0-0 20.511 7.327 Vel= 19.18 5 0.0 1.598 2E 11.656 46.333 23.151 to 150.0 1T 11.656 23.312 1.299 R3 91.22 0.1837 0.0 69.645 12.793 Vel = 14.59 R3 0.0 1.598 1 E 5.828 12.000 37.243 to '150.0 0.0 5.828 5.197 R2 91.22 0.1837 0.0 17.828 3.275 Vel = 14.59 R2 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 4.200 45.715 to 150.0 2E 11.656 23.312 0.0 R1 91.22 0.1837 0.0 27.512 5.053 Vel = 14.59 R1 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 0.700 50.768 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 CTE 91.22 0.1837 0.0 12.356 2.270 Vel = 14.59 CTE 0.0 6.065 6E 59-951 144.000 53.038 to 100.0 0.0 59.951 10.394 TOR 91.22 0.0006 0.0 203.951 0.120 Vel = 1.01 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 5 ,CENTRAL HOUSE LOFT Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv Notes **«**« Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn TOR 0.0 6.065 1D 33.544 9.000 63.552 to 100.0 1B 7.137 62.092 3.032 BOR 91.22 0.0006 1T 21.411 71.092 0.042 Vel = 1.01 BOR 0.0 6.065 1E 9.992 6.000 66.626 to 100.0 0.0 9.992 5.000 * Fixed loss= 5 UG 91.22 0.0006 0.0 15.992 0.009 Vel = 1.01 UG 0.0 6.16 1T 43.037 100.000 71.635 to 140.0 1E 20.084 67.425 -3.898 TEST 91.22 0.0003 1G 4.304 167.425 0.049 Vel = 0.98 250.00 Qa= 250.00 341.22 67.786 K Factor= 41.44 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 1 vzz�// v nff�_A - Metro-Swift METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. 58r PULASKI STREET PEABODY, MA 01960 978-532-2907 Job Name CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Remote Area NFPA 13 - 4 HEAD DESIGN Head Info 20x20 SPACING 22 GPM MIN, 10.2 PSI MIN ACTUAL MAX 177 SF Flows 342 GPM ROD AT TEST (NCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressures 63 PSI ROD AT TEST, 20 PSI SAFETY Data File CENTRAL.wx2 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 'METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 1 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Hydraulic Desian Summary Sheet Name - CENTRAL HOUSE - 2ND FLR UNIT 5 LIV RM RESIDENTIAL Remote Area - NFPA 13 - 4 HEAD DESIGN Head Information - 20x2O SPACING 22 GPM MIDI, 10.2 PSI MIN ACTUAL MAX 177 SF Flow Information - 342 GPM RQD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressure Information - 63 PSI RQD AT TEST, 20 PSI SAFETY Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Water Supply Curve (C) METRO- SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 2 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 City Water Supply: Demand: C1 - Static Pressure 83 D - Elevation 9.528 C2 - Residual Pressure: 79 D2 - System Flow 91.617 C2 - Residual Flow 1460 D2 - System Pressure 62.061 Hose ( Adj City ) Hose ( Demand ) 250 D3 - System Demand 341.617 Safety Margin 20.666 150 140 130 --- p 120 -- R 110 E 100 --- S 90 C1 C2 -- _ S 80 U 70 D2 --- R 60 E 50 -- 40 30 ---- 20 10 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW ( NA1.85 ) Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure / Flow Summary - STANDARD METRO-SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 3 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Node Elevation K-Fact Pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual Req. D101 22.0 6.9 10.2 na 22.04 0.1 220 10.2 0102 22.0 6.9 10.2 ne 22.04 0.1 220 10.2 20 22.0 K=K@ EQ02 13.37 ne 23.57 21 22.0 K=K@ EQ02 13.45 na 23.65 40 22.0 14.06 ne 18 22.0 K=K@ EQ01 11.22 na 22.04 19 22.0 K=K@ EQ02 12.03 na 22.36 37 22.0 13.07 na 38 22.0 14.15 na 39 22.0 15.29 na F3 22.0 25.8 na F2 22.0 33.52 na F1 22.0 42.33 na R1 22.0 45.02 na CTE 22.0 47.31 na TOR -2.0 57.83 na BOR -9.0 60.9 na UG -9.0 65.91 na TEST 0.0 62.06 na 250.0 The maximum velocity is 19.26 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 39 and F3 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams -METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 4 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv *'***'* Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Ph D101 22.04 1.101 3E 11.475 1.000 10.200 K Factor=6.90 to 150.0 0.0 11.475 0.0 EQ01 22.04 0.0814 0.0 12.475 1.016 Vel= 7.43 0.0 22.04 11.216 K Factor= 6.58 D102 22.04 1.101 1T 9.563 1.000 10.200 K Factor= 6.90 to 150.0 2E 7.65 17.212 0.0 EQ02 22.04 0.0814 0.0 18.212 1.483 Vel= 7.43 0.0 22.04 11.683 K Factor= 6.45 20 23.57 1.394 0.0 2.790 13.369 K Factor @ node EQ02 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21 23.57 0.0290 0.0 2.790 0.081 Vel = 4,95 21 23.65 1.394 1E 4.762 1.160 13.450 K Factor @ node EQ02 to 150.0 0.0 4.761 0.0 40 4722 0.1057 0.0 5.921 0.626 Vel= 9.93 40 0.0 1.394 1T 9.523 2.000 14.075 to 150.0 0.0 9.523 0.0 39 47.22 0.1056 0.0 11.523 1.217 Vel = 9.93 0.0 4722 15.293 K Factor= 12.07 18 22.04 1.101 0.0 10.000 11.216 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 22.04 0.0814 0.0 10.000 0.814 Vel = 7.43 19 22.36 1.394 IE 4.762 6.250 12.030 K Factor @ node EQ02 to 150.0 0.0 4.761 0.0 37 44.4 0.0943 0.0 11.011 1.038 Vel = 9.33 37 0.0 1.394 1T 9.523 2.000 13.068 to 150.0 0.0 9.523 0.0 38 44.4 0.0942 0.0 11.523 i.086 Vel = 9.33 38 0.0 1.394 0.0 12.080 14.154 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39 44.4 0.0943 0.0 12.080 1.139 Vel = 9.33 39 47.22 1.394 1T 9.523 19.660 15.293 to 150.0 0.0 9.523 0.0 F3 91.662 0.3601 _ 0.0 29.183 10.510 Vel = 19.26 F3 0.0 1.598 3E 17.484 24.160 25.803 to 150.0 0.0 17.484 0.0 F2 91.62 0.1852 0.0 41.644 7.712 Vel = 14.66 F2 0.0 1.598 1E 5.828 41.750 33.515 to 150.0 0.0 5.828 0.0 F1 91.62 0.1852 0.0 47.578 8.811 Vel = 14.66 F1 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 2.910 42.326 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 R1 91.62 0.1852 0.0 14.566 2.697 Vel = 14.66 R1 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 0.700 45.023 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 CTE 91.62 0.1852 0.0 12.356 2.288 Vel = 14.66 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams 'M'ETR6 - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 5 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv **** ** Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn CTE 0.0 6.065 6E 59.951 144.000 47.311 to 100.0 0.0 59.951 10.394 TOR 91.62 0.0006 0.0 203.951 0.121 Vel= 1.02 TOR 0.0 6.065 1 D 33.544 9.000 57.826 to 100.0 1 B 7.137 62.092 3.032 BOR 91.62 0.0006 1T 21.411 71.092 0.042 Vel = 1.02 BOR 0.0 6.065 1E 9.992 6.000 60.900 to 100.0 0.0 9.992 5.000 ` Fixed loss= 5 UG 91.62 0.0006 0-0 15.992 0-010 Vel= 1.02 UG 0.0 6.16 1T 43.037 100.000 65.910 to 140.0 1 E 20.084 67.425 -3.898 TEST 91.62 0.0003 1 G 4.304 167.425 0.049 Vel = 0.99 250.00 Qa = 250.00 341.62 62.061 K Factor= 43.36 Cnm nirtcr Prnnrome hi Hurlrn4cn Inn gnii90 999 WinAhnm NI N 1 ICA nzna7 �1 1 � Metro-Swift METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. 58r PULASKI STREET PEABODY, MA 01960 978-532-2907 Job !Name CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Remote Area NFPA 13- 4 HEAD DESIGN Head Info 20x20 SPACING 22 GPM MIN, 10.2 PSI MIN ACTUAL MAX 177 SF Flows 341 GPM RQD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressures 55 PSI ROD AT TEST, 27 PSI SAFETY Data File CENTRAL.wx3 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 METRO-SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 1 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Hydraulic Design Summary Sheet Name - CENTRAL HOUSE - 2ND FLR UNIT 5 MASTER BR RESIDFNTIAL Remote Area - NFPA 13 - 4 HEAD DESIGN Head Information - 20x20 SPACING 22 GPM MIN, 10.2 PSI MIN ACTUAL NLA: 177 SF Flow Information - 341 GPM RQD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressure Information - 55 PSI RQD AT TEST, 27 PSI SAFETY" Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Water Supply Curve (C) METRO- SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 2 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 City Water Supply: Demand: C1 - Static Pressure 83 D1 - Elevation 9.528 C2 - Residual Pressure: 79 D2 - System Flow 90.635 C2 - Residual Flow 1460 D2 - System Pressure 54.870 Hose ( Adj City ) Hose ( Demand ) 250 D3 - System Demand 340.635 Safety Margin 27.859 150 140 -- 130 p 120 R 110 E 100 S 90 C1 C2 — S 80 -- U 70 ---- R 60 E 50 D3 40 —"-- 30 20 10 D1 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW ( NA 1.85 ) Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure / Flow Summary - STANDARD METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 3 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Node Elevation K-Fact Pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual Req D201 22.0 6.9 10.2 na 2204 0.1 220 102 D202 22.0 6.9 10.2 ne 2204 0.1 220 10.2 17 22.0 K=K@ EQ01 11.5 na 22.31 14 22.0 K=K@ EQ01 11.22 na 22.04 15 22.0 K=K @ EQ02 12.24 na 22.56 41 22.0 12.45 na 16 22.0 K=K @ EQ02 13.55 na 23.73 42 22.0 17.13 ne 43 22.0 21.2 na 44 22.0 25.26 na F2 22.0 26.6 na F1 22.0 35.24 ne R1 22.0 37.88 na CTE 22.0 40.12 na TOR -2.0 50.64 na BOR -9.0 53.71 ne UG -9.0 58.72 na TEST 0.0 54.87 ne 250.0 The maximum velocity is 19.05 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 16 and 42 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 4 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv ***""*" Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn D201 22.04 1.101 3E 11.475 1.000 10.200 K Factor= 6.90 to 150.0 0.0 11.475 0.0 EQ01 22.04 0.0814 0.0 12.475 1.016 Vel= 7.43 0.0 22.04 11.216 K Factor= 6.58 D202 22.04 1.101 1 T 9.563 1.000 10.200 K Factor= 6.90 to 150.0 2E 7.65 17.212 0.0 EQ02 22.04 0.0814 0.0 18.212 1.483 Vel = 7.43 0.0 22.04 11.683 K Factor= 6.45 17 22.31 1.101 1T 9.563 1.870 11.496 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 9.562 0.0 41 22.31 0.0833 0.0 11.432 0.952 Vel = 7,52 0.0 22.31 - 12.448 K Factor= 6.32 14 22.04 1.101 1 E 3.825 8.790 11.216 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 3.825 0.0 15 22.04 0.0814 0.0 12.615 1.027 Vel = 7.43 15 22.56 1.394 0.0 2.160 12.243 K Factor @ node EQ02 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41 44.6 0.0949 0.0 2.160 0.205 Vel = 9.38 41 22.31 1.394 0.0 5.450 12.448 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 66.91 0.2013 0.0 5.450 1.097 Vel = 14.07 16 23.72 1.394 0.0 10.160 13.545 K Factor @ node EQ02 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42 90.63 0.3531 0.0 10.160 3.587 Vei= 19.05 42 0.0 1.394 1 E 4.762 6.750 17.132 to 150.0 0.0 4.761 0.0 43 90.63 0.3531 0.0 11.511 4.064 Vel = 19.05 43 0.0 1.394 1 T 9.523 2.000 21.196 to 150.0 0.0 9.523 0.0 44 90.63 0.3530 0.0 11.523 4.068 Vel = 19.05 44 0.0 1.598 1E 5.828 1.540 25.264 to 150.0 0.0 5.828 0.0 F2 90.63 0.1815 0.0 7.368 1-337 Vel = 14-50 F2 0.0 1.598 1E 5.828 41.750 26.601 to 150.0 0.0 5.828 0.0 F1 90.63 0.1815 0.0 47.578 8.637 Vel = 14 50 Ft 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 2.910 35.238 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 R1 90.63 0.1815 0.0 14.566 2.644 Val = 14.50 R1 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 0.700 37.882 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 CTE 90.63 0.1815 0.0 12.356 2.243 Vel = 14.50 CTE 0.0 6.065 6E 59.951 144.000 40.125 to 100.0 0.0 59.951 10.394 TOR 90.63 0.0006 0.0 203.951 0.119 Vel = 1.01 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams METRO- SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 5 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv ****"" Notes Point Qt Pf1Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn ------------- -- - -.-... ----- --- - - ------ -- - - TOR 0.0 6.065 1D 33.544 9.000 50.638 to 100.0 1B 7.137 62.092 3.032 BOR 90.63 0.0006 1T 21.411 71.092 0-041 Vel = 1.01 BOR 0.0 6.065 1 E 9.992 6.000 53.711 to 100.0 0.0 9.992 5.000 Fixed loss= 5 UG 90.63 0.0006 0.0 15.992 0.009 Vel = 1.01 UG 0.0 6.16 1T 43.037 100.000 58.720 to 140.0 IE 20.084 67.425 -3.898 TEST 90.63 0.0003 1G 4.304 167.425 0.048 Vel = 0.98 250.00 Qa= 250.00 340.63 54.870 K Factor= 45.98 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Metro-Swift METRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. 58r PULASKI STREET PEABODY, MA 01960 978-532-2907 Job Name CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND CORRIDOR Remote Area .10 GPM OVER THE ROOM AREA Head Info 5 HEADS CALCULATED AT 225 SF Flows 371 GPM ROD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressures 57 PSI ROD AT TEST, 25 PSI SAFETY Data File CENTRAL.wx4 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 METIRO - SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 1 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND CORRIDOR Date 052208 Hydraulic Design Summary Sheet Name - CENTRAL HOUSE - 2ND FLR CORRIDOR Remote Area - .10 GPM OVER THE ROOM AREA Head Information - 5 HEADS CALCULATED AT 225 SF Flow Information - 371 GPM RQD AT TEST INCL 250 GPM HOSE Pressure Information - 57 PSI RQD AT TEST, 25 PSI SAFETY Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Water Supply Curve (C) METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 2 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND CORRIDOR Date 052208 Demand: City Water Supply: DemD1 - Elevation 9.528 C1 - Static Pressure 83 C2 - Residual Pressure: 79 D2 - System Flow 120.981 C2 - Residual Flow 1460 D2 - System Pressure 57.536 Hose ( Adj City ) Hose ( Demand ) 250 D3 - System Demand 370.981 Safety Margin 25.146 150 140 130 P 120 R 110 E 100 S 90 C1 C2 S 80 U 70 R 60 nq E 50 D3 40 30 20 10 D1 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW ( NA 1.85 ) Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure / Flow Summary - STANDARD METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 3 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND CORRIDOR Date 052208 Node Elevation K-Fact Pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual Req D301 22.0 5.6 16.14 na 22.5 0.1 225 7.0 D302 22.0 5.6 16.14 na 22.5 0.1 225 7.0 D303 22.0 5.6 16.14 na 22.5 0.1 225 7.0 D304 22.0 5.6 16.14 na 22.5 0.1 225 7.0 11 22.0 K=K @ EQ03 19.92 na 24.22 52 22.0 20.9 na 13 22.0 K=K @ EQ04 21.38 na 25.09 12 22.0 K=K @ EQ04 24.0 na 26.58 9 22.0 K=K @ EQ01 17.2 na 22.5 10 22.0 K=K @ EQ02 17.84 na 22.6 47 22.0 18.47 na 48 22.0 19.59 na 49 22.0 20.98 na 44 22.0 21.17 na F2 22.0 21.98 na 50 22.0 22.44 na 51 22.0 25.18 na F1 22.0 34.3 na R7 22.0 38.81 na CTE 22.0 42.64 na TOR -2.0 53.23 na BOR -9.0 56.34 na UG -9.0 61.35 na TEST 0.0 57.54 na 250.0 The maximum velocity is 19.35 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 51 and F1 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams ' METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 4 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND CORRIDOR Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv **** Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn D301 22.50 1.101 3E 11.475 1.000 16.143 K Factor= 5.60 to 150.0 0.0 11.475 0.0 EQ01 22.5 0.0846 0.0 12.475 1.056 Vel = 7.58 0.0 22.50 17.199 K Factor= 5.43 D302 22.50 1.101 IT 9.563 1.000 16.143 K Factor= 5.60 to 150.0 2E 7.65 17.212 0.0 EQ02 22.5 0.0846 0.0 18.212 1.541 Vel = 7.58 0.0 22.50 17.684 K Factor= 5.35 D303 22.50 1.101 3E 11.475 1.000 16.143 K Factor= 5.60 to 150.0 0.0 11.475 0.0 EQ03 22.5 0.0846 0.0 12.475 1.056 Vel = 7.58 0.0 22.50 17.199 K Factor= 5.43 D304 22.50 1.101 3E 11.475 1.000 16.143 K Factor= 5.60 to 150.0 0.0 11.475 0.0 EQ04 22.5 0.0846 0.0 12.475 1.056 Vel = 7.58 0.0 22.50 17.199 K Factor= 5.43 11 24.22 1.101 1T 9.563 0.540 19.921 K Factor @ node EQ03 to 150.0 0.0 9.562 0.0 52 24.22 0.0969 0.0 10.102 0.979 Vel = 8.16 52 0.0 2.003 1T 12.965 2.250 20.900 to 150.0 0.0 12.965 0.0 49 24.22 0.0053 0.0 15.215 0.080 Vel = 2.47 0.0 24.22 20.980 K Factor= 5.29 13 25.09 1.101 1T 9.563 0.660 21.380 K Factor @ node EQ04 to 150.0 0.0 9.562 0.0 50 25.09 0.1035 0.0 10.222 1.058 Vel = 8.46 0.0 25.09 22.438 K Factor= 5.30 12 26.58 1.101 1T 9.563 0.660 24.001 K Factor @ node EQ04 to 150.0 0.0 9.562 0.0 51 26.58 0.1151 0.0 10.222 1.177 Vel = 8.96 0.0 - 26.58 25.178 K Factor= 5.30 9 22.50 1.101 0.0 7.580 17.199 K Factor @ node EQ01 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 22.5 0.0846 0.0 7.580 0.641 Vel= 7.58 10 22.60 1.394 1 E 4.762 1.750 17.840 K Factor @ node EQ02 to 150.0 0.0 4.761 0.0 47 45.1 0.0971 0.0 6.511 0.632 Vel = 9.48 47 0.0 1.394 IT 9.523 2.000 18.472 to 150.0 0.0 9.523 0.0 48 45.1 0.0970 0.0 11.523 1.118 Vel = 9.48 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Hazen-Williams ' 'METRO -SWIFT SPRINKLER CORP. Page 5 CENTRAL HOUSE 2ND CORRIDOR Date 052208 Hyd. Qa Dia. Fitting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv ****** Notes Point Qt Pf/Ft Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn 48 0.0 1.598 2E 11.656 16.200 19.590 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 49 45.1 0.0499 0.0 27.856 1.390 Vel = 7.21 49 24.21 1.598 0.0 1.700 20.980 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44 69.31 0.1106 0.0 1.700 0.188 Vel = 11.09 44 0.0 1.598 1E 5.828 1.540 21.168 to 150.0 0.0 5.828 0.0 F2 69.31 0.1106 0.0 7.368 0.815 Vel = 11.09 F2 0.0 1.598 0.0 4.120 21.983 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50 69.31 0.1104 0.0 4.120 0.455 Vel = 11.09 50 25.09 1.598 0.0 14.000 22.438 to 150.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51 94.4 0.1957 0.0 14.000 2.740 Vel = 15.10 51 26.58 '1.598 1E 5.828 23.620 25.178 to 150.0 0.0 5.828 0.0 F1 120.98 0.3097 0.0 29.448 9.121 Vel = 19.35 F1 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 2.910 34.299 to 150.0 D.0 11.656 0.0 R1 120.98 0.3098 0.0 14.566 4.512 Vel = 19.35 R1 0.0 1.598 1T 11.656 0.700 38.811 to 150.0 0.0 11.656 0.0 CTE 120.98 0.3097 0.0 12.356 3.827 Vel = 19.35 CTE 0.0 6.065 6E 59.951 144.000 42.638 to 100.0 0.0 59.951 10.394 TOR 120.98 0.0010 0.0 203.951 0.202 Vel = 1.34 TOR 0.0 6.065 1D 33.544 9.000 53.234 to 100.0 1 B 7.137 62.092 3.032 BOR 120.98 0.0010 IT 21.411 71.092 0.070 Vol = 1.34 BOR 0.0 6.065 1E 9.992 6.000 56.336 to 100.0 0.0 9.992 5.000 Fixed loss= 5 UG _ 120.98 0.0010 0.0 15.992 0.016 Vel = 1.34 - - - - -- _ - UG 0.0 6.16 1T 43.037 100.000 61.352 to 140.0 1E 20.084 67.425 -3.898 TEST 120.98 0.0005 1G 4.304 167.425 0.082 Val= 1.30 250.00 Qa = 250.00 370.98 57.536 K Factor= 48.91 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 WINTER STREET ARCHITECTS FIELD OBSERVATION Observation Date: August 5,2008 REPORT # Attention: Mike Banner Page 1 of 3 Contractor: RCG Builders Weather: 72,partly cloudy Project: 0265.001 Central House Location: 155189 Washington Street Salem,MA 01970 TRADES ON SITE: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Work in Progress: Removing existing floor in Units 1-3 and 6-7 and installing new floor joists. • Installing sheathing in rear of building • Installing new flashing detail at Second Floor windows. Estimated%of Progress: Observations: . Exterior wrapped in Tyvek • Plumbing piping installed,were able to reuse some existing stacks. Large stack near Unit#2 was rebuilt. • Chimney in Unit#5 that was to be removed must remain,is being used to vent oil burner below. • Vertical HVAC ducts from 2nd floor ceilings to roof are installed. • Windows along rear facade in Unit#5 are to be replaced. • Unit#7 layout to be revised,relocate closet and laundry. Study to be included in bedroom. New type F window relocated within bedroom. • Unit#1 kitchen to be larger as a result of the removal and relocation of the existing corridor wall. • Unit#7 rear exterior wall of bedroom reframed. Items to Verify: . Walid,from Acoustonica,to verify correct transition between regular floor assembly and acoustically treated floor assembly. • WSA to investigate a drainage bladder for the intersection of the new and existing buildings. Action Items: Include in new regular and acoustic floor assembly in drawings.Acoustic: Existing joists,%'Advantech T&G plywood, 1"RIM,2 layers of W"OSB,2'/a" Gyperete,'/a'Advantech T&G plywood,'/"Finish floor • Left entrance stairs to be rebuilt with uniform risers, including 1 more than existing Attachments: See attached photos 209 Essex Street suite 300 salern, Massachusetts 0'1.970 978.744,7'379 t, WINTER STREET ARCH€'I'ECTS s r i Report by .I j, Kathryn Giardi;Winter Street Architects, Inc ignature S t i tr. f _ jt j It i t gg { 1_ g y u ' AREATO BE FLASHED AT FIRST FLOOR ROOF WASHINGTON STREET ELEVATION r Y, s� �J r fid.:" t v T :9P ml SECOND FLOOR WINDOW�FF�RAApMINGAND EXISTING FLOOR JOISTS SECOND FLOOR EXISTING FLOOR JOISTS m a � E e THIRD FLOOR NEW AND EXISTING FLOOR JOISTSAND STAIR FRAMING SECOND FLOOR PLUMBING INSTALLED WINTER STREET A.ERGhi7TEC;.TS 6', 4 =i r Ei1. i *t r i ay Fku h L n i OVERALL SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION EXISTING FLOOR JOISTSAT SECOND FLOOR NEAR RIG666HT7HANDSTAIR it I iii ��Si i y - Y OVERALL SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION OVERALL SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION .a r i REAR FACADE PREPARED FOR NEW SIDING EXTERIOR WALL OF UNIT#7 REFRAMED AND PREPARED FOR NEW SIDING t 18 Temple Street EC NeuNuryport,MA 01 950 Phone978-985-6129 • • t Fax:978-255-3555 July 21; 2008 Tom McGrath Salem Public Properties t Building Department 120 Washington Street, V Floor Salem MA 01970 Phone: (978) 745-9595 x5641 Re: Central House, 155 Washington Street, Salem, MA Ref: Structural capacity Mr. McGrath: I understand your office would like a letter speaking to the structural floor capacity of the referenced project- In particular the capacity of the second floor framing. The capacity of the existing steel framing is approximately 100 PSF. There are areas of existing wood framing that ultimately load that steel which do not have the capacity of 100 PSF at present. The required live loading for the proposed residential use is 40 PSF. The proposed dead load for the sound attenuation for the second floor added to the existing dead load is approximately 40 PSF total. It is my intention and the intention of the owner 1 builder to bring the whole second floor framing up to 80 PSF capacity minimum. This will be achieved by sistering the existing framing and(or adding supplemental framing between the existing framing. If you require any additional information please contact his office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, `V0�4, r �X �ZN DF AAAS S'95'y� KENNETH A.WOODS STRUCTURAL e No.39885 Kenneth A.Woodsi A pTtT�S "tv"q.. r �rav�t cue -� C.19 LA4.5 _ G 4- /f � -.__ .-_i .•� Tib t�4r � � {' y��r, } r Oce I tt t t . .'! ... 4 t 5-S 3 S- 5 13 f+s 1 u7uJB itnrt�� Thomas McGrath From: Ken Woods [kenwoods @ comcast.not] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:50 PM To: Thomas McGrath Subject: Emailing: Central House 2nd framing partial.pdf Attachments: Central House 2nd framing partial.pdf A ohc Central House 2nd framing part... Tom, I understand your need for framing drawings on the 155 Washington project. I include here a sketch I gave the field. I am in the process of catching up on things after being away on vacation with my family. Michael Bernier has mentioned several times you would like drawings- my apologies for taking so long. As I said in a past letter the existing steel is good for 100 PSF total but the wood framing was not. Several months went by waiting for a sound proofing detail such that we could determine what the new dead loads were going to be so we could design the framing accordingly. That information has only been available for 3 or 4 weeks - two of which I was away. I will create a cleaner version of the sketch in CAD but substantively the information will be the same as the sketch. FYI the soundproofing detail weighs —40 PSF. Residential LIVE laod is 40 PSF so the whole system will be capable of no less than 80 PSF total. Sincerely, Ken Woods The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Central House 2nd framing partial.pdf Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 1