The URL can be used to link to this page

0018 WASHINGTON SQUARE WEST - BUILDING JACKET _� _a 1 � 8 � f��-1 I �6C—�� a —�--�—� ,_ij �1 Certificate No: 589-11 Building Permit No.: 589-11 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem Building Electrical Mechanical Permits This is to Certify that the HOTEL located at ----------------------------------------------------- Dwelling Type IS WASHINGTON SQUARE in the CITY OF SALEM - - - - - -- ---- ------------------------- ------ --- Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PERMINT FOR(101 BATHROOMS PHASE 1 ONLY) This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto, and expires unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date ---------------------- Issued On:Thu Jul 7, 2011 ----------- - -- --------- -- --- - - --------------------- --------------------- GeoTMS®2011 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. --------------------------------/'--------------------------------------------- 18 Washington Square 589-11 I M Is : 35 16750 P COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS a n � � ,.„ r sloek r N CITY OF SALEM Lot ° ._ 0412-0 �s Category: RENOVATIONS ` ii Peron,t# 589.1, BUILDING PERMIT Project# JS-2611-0067661, ' Est Post $771,000-00 Fee Charged $8,486.00 �BxtanceDue:' �$ oo1`ri'�t` k ' '�� PERMISSION ISHEREBYGRANTED TO: Const'Class:` Contractor: License: Expires Use Groupt W"" '` i`* t'� Roger A Tremblay Contractors,Inc. Lot Size sq:ft.):, r, -+J Owner: Hawthorne Hotel in iUmts Gained;: , f, ' a ,; ,. " ,n1t„k, J Applicant: Roger A Tremblay Contractors Inc. Units Lost �� F k Td AT: 18 Washington Square ISSUED ON: 03-Feb-2011 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 03-Jul-201'1 TO PERFOkJ THE FOLLOWING WORK: RENOVATION OF(101)BATHROOMS AS PER PLANS jbh POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas - Plumbing Building ' Undcrgroundi Underground: Underground: Excavation: - Service - _ Meter: - }` Footings: r R0"-h-' Rough: Rough:, Foundation: � `• Fin�a/l _ ., � Final: Final: � - Rough Frame: - w •� ; Fire Health Fireplace/Chimney. { `•�� Insulation: ' Meter ` Oil: - L Final: QC V 7/7/!I Houa# Smoke: # •i W,ter:.. . - Treasur Assessor ( y' ater Alarm: P`I� (`"OP Sewer: Sprinklers: - Final: - - I THIS PERMITMAY BE REVOKED BY'THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL1kF6N PF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: - _'"'Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUILDING REC-20i 1-000815 03-F'eb-11 '7566 $8,486.00 IMPORTANT:OWNER OR CONTRACTOR MUST ARRANGE FOR PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION.SEE CURRENT BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 1 FOR LIST OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. CALL 978-619-5641 TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION GcoTMS©2011 Des Landers Municipal Solutions;Inc. Y i ��•CoN�iT�,� �� YSCYE AO CITY OF SALEM ' BUILDING PERMIT 2 j t Hawthorne Hotel Phase 3 Finish Inspection May 2012 Shower Lav Shower Lav I Contractor Room# Temp(F) I Temp(F) Temp(F) Temp(F) Date Inspector Rep Comments 314 105 127 05/15/12 128 - - 05/15/12 123 102 124 05/15/12 j3U171 125 - 05/15/12 124 05/15/12 125 05/15/12 414 100128 05/15/12 415 104 123 05/15/12 416 102 123 1 103 124 05/15/12 417 108 119 - - 05/16/12 418 109 122 - - 05/16/12 423 108 120 05/16/12 514 113 125 1 - - 05/16/12 515 1 112 110 1 - - 05/16/12 516 100 121 110 120 05/16/12 517 102 119 05/16/12 518 106 116 05/16/12 523 100 115 05/16/12 614 100 116 05/16/12 615 108 120 05/16/12 616 102 121 104 122 05/16/12 617 110 112 - - 05/16/12 618 107 129 - 05/16/12 623 107 130 - 05/16/12 All temperatures were recorded with plumbing inspector and contractor present on dates noted above. George O'Connell Z Plumbing Inspector Plumbin nspect Signature Dat George Batsinelas Contractor(representative) Contractor(Rep) Signature Date J s / Page I of I GYtic 1 Lucie Ogeron From: Lucie Ogeron /G�3, �j�oy ��Aft) e1�f Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:05 PM ✓}' � �s Gz To: Juli Lederhaus Cc: James Gilliss; Megan Campbell; Kelly Lilly Subject: Plumbing inspection Importance: High ° r/ 314 les f2/J 7i S�wr /2y ln✓ V 315 106, 14s 316 /030 S//Sfrz „ 1z3 ,, /az'SI1wr QJZsftiv /317 // "° 4)3-Ag " /Rb"' " (}/�Joe O f3 -,/—PA ;,. 318L�I2, // /�'I'ai/ t/ 323 414 99.)'o J" 1L � /2 y.n f. �otv i��u ✓ S�wtl V415 / o S/if1/�i, ri /,Z30 H ✓416 /4$ y--417 /418 ok�Ve rag y�,H�/v /za v423 4/514 ll'0 X515 f516Ioa� / j J1b .r S /1/zi f,2!o /r ✓�1, <<,,a v/ �/a° Jii;.r✓ .2 �j k fi7 x/518 /06` -f7* l-t- 523 X 69 // ✓Yc �/A� ~i �� v 523 ✓614Jo64 v�/'v //t, Q 1"615 10 5 2 /;O X617 //a ® 5/I� /r'1� 1128 �i '0�.'��4J!2177 c/618 /rr/jv / v 112O'Ir ✓ 149 623/y�.y ✓/ /H1l� 13.0 5/15/2012 I Y • f Hawthorne Hotel Phase 3 Finish Inspection May 2012 Shower Lav Shower Lav Contractor Room# Temp(F) Temp(F) Temp(F) Temp(F) Date Inspector Rep Comments 314 105 127 05/15/12 315 106 128 - - 05/15/12 316 103 123 102 124 05/15/12 317 113 125 - - 05/15/12 318 102 124 05/15/12 323 112 125 05/15/12 414 100 128 05/15/12 415 104 123 05/15/12 416 102 123 103 124 05/15/12 417 108 119 - - 05/16/12 418 109 122 - - 05/16/12 423 108 120 - - 05/16/12 514 113 125 - - 05/16/12 515 112 110 - - 05/16/12 516 100 121 110 120 05/16/12 517 102 119 - - 05/16/12 518 106 116 - - 05/16/12 523 100 115 - - 05/16/12 614 100 116 - - 05/16/12 615 108 120 - - 05/16/12 616 102 121 104 122 05/16/12 617 110 112 - - 05/16/12 618 107 129 05/16/12 623 107 130 05/16/12 All temperatures were recorded with plumbing inspector and contractor present on dates noted above. YNGeorge O'Connell n nspea re Plumbing Inspector Plumbict 2 SignatuDat George Batsinelas Contractor(representative) Contractor(Rep) Signature Date J � n / Page 1 of 1 I7RUltr70k'PIC )1r,le / / ;-145 t Lucie Ogeron From: Lucie Ogeron //��3 ^ �o� F 94/3J/? Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:05 PM To: Juli Lederhaus <{f< Cc: James Gilliss; Megan Campbell; Kelly Lilly Subject: Plumbing inspection Importance: High ° r/ 314 /OS'�/6v jwr /2y la✓ V 315 /i /43°2av 316 !03° 5/iSfrz fr /z3" n /aa�°shwYQQ12 �v /317 i!3° 4�i5�i2 11 /96 ' v (}/�✓�� Of U -/�^� 318 IOrz6 d 323 ✓ 414 99,%°9' OL " /1� a t. 3V /owi /u ✓ S�wr s/ 415 416 /�(] X 418 /�q� �G II v !/ o oX�f7� ��/�� i S �Ji� t33/�N V423 e x/514 173 31/bfl� 12 � )1515 fd 5JlL /Ix j!a° •t { / X516 !,20° ,S' /k//ti 4.;1-1 // / v OX •x/518 I�bG 3b �r4�lfv </6" OJ��AE'.S�tG v 523 /pUQ sllFflZ" ✓614 Ai or !/lo 1'615 lo$° {iflG`/2 ISO' 617 $ 1pv ✓ /!6 5 11 rig Oh- s�Gfiv e--�618 lytjv 5/15/2012 Hawthorne Hotel Phase 3 Finish Inspection May 2012 Shower Lav Shower Lav Contractor Room # Temp(F) Temp(F) Temp(F) Temp(F) Date Inspector Rep Comments 314 105 127 05/15/12 315 106 128 - - 05/15/12 316 103 123 102 124 05/15/12 317 113 125 - - 05/15/12 318 102 124 - 05/15/12 323 112 125 - 05/15/12 414 100 128 - 05/15/12 415 104 123 - 05/15/12 416 102 123 103 124 05/15/12 417 108 119 - - 05/16/12 418 109 122 - 05/16/12 423 108 120 - 05/16/12 514 113 125 - 05/16/12 515 112 110 - - 05/16/12 516 100 121 110 120 05/16/12 517 102 119 - - 05/16/12 518 106 116 05/16/12 523 100 115 05/16/12 614 100 116 05/16/12 615 108 120 - 05/16/12 616 102 121 104 122 05/16/12 617 110 112 - - 05/16/12 618 107 129 05/16/12 623 107 130 05/16/12 All temperatures were recorded with plumbing inspector and contractor present on dates noted above. George O'Connell yea �(� Plumbing Inspector Plumbing nspect Signature Datef George Batsinelas Contractor(representative) Contractor(Rep) Signature Date Page 1 of 1 �7dWTy14Yt1{ /`J�fe/ / �A'1C � '" /7vi6S�Jy-�+9.1�° Lucie Ogeron From: Lucie Ogeron ///�' s4ol'F 4%q/-5/72-9 - Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:05 PM // To: Juli Lederhaus Cc: James Gilliss; Megan Campbell; Kelly Lilly Subject: Plumbing inspection Importance: High r/ 314 :ft� /Bi'1�rJ7, j�wr /27° v V 315 16,60 / 316 /030 s//sJYa If 1z3� ri /04 S11WY 12 �< v .Z-/e��J /317 I!3° /,y,5""' a d/tJoe (3 3 y 318 /dz, vS G 72 e/ /�'f4eY j/ 323 /� X414 y9,y°� t2 lZBa tr �V /ow /z�/Olv S�wv V 415 /oy o a ✓416 $° k,1417 V91 !, /'g.? v Of �j(7i /hflZ / ��lGf,7 ox; V V 423 /4 SJ/ri� f 20 m r 4/514 jf37 d�lbfJ7� / r yr ✓515 1,11 J6 n-' jeb rt o ( l 711516 /06al4�Jzi X517 fo,6 .°i Cfr l2 // as i! ✓ cl/Q�v�IG/Jj 4 4518 )0b -9*1 4� 523 /avQ sl4fCz ' JJv" F, ,,-614 /a 4 m �$ 1,oz., �y p`615 1o.0 0 3/j/G�t2 JPO' {F (/616 I a�Z ` f / R/ v 617 Ifv ° 5�/J��jv //;Z d ZT90174 /618 jgr/v ✓�/ l�llL LA9� i/62314�/ 1f/�jiy V'gp o 5/15/2012 i �4o�ye, /s cawrtnj �� z s iy h DpJ<�4- Titu of %tem, Aassac4usttts Department of Public Oeruires (One 14xlem Green 745-9595 Ext. 321 CHARLES F.GUIGLEY City Engineer Director of Public Services DATE: January 3, 1996 TO: Mike Garvin, General Manager Hawthorne Hotel 18 Washington Square Salem,MA 01970 FROM: Charles F. Quigley, P.E. Director of Public Services RE: Health and Safety Violations/ Water Supply Suspension Dear Mr. Garvin, As you may recall, you were notified in June 1995 to have certain identified fire supply and domestic water service violations corrected. It is my understanding that the violations identified have yet to be corrected. Recently Schlumberger Industries reported that they were unable to install a new water meter due to serious deterioration of the domestic water supply. They also reported that the Fire Supply is leaking and there is an apparent illegal domestic water tap off the fire supply. Previously Salem Cross Connection Inspector, Bob Deschene, has notified hotel management that the required backflow prevention valve on the fire supply has not been installed. This is a health code violation. Please contact me immediately regarding these serious City and State health and safety code violations with a plan for making the required improvements. Corrective work is to start no later than January 15, 1996. In the event this work is not in progress we will be required to discontinue water service to the Hotel. Sincerely, Charles F. Quigley, P.E. cc: Norman LaPointe, fire protection: R. Deschene, Cross Connection Inspector: Joanne Scott, Public Health Agent: C. Kent, Water Department: R. Ledoux, City Solicitor SENDER: Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the • Complete items a,and as a b, following services(for an extra fee): • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to you, 1. ❑ Addressee's Address • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the day+P space.Hoes not permit. • Mite"Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below ti article num'd2r. 2. ❑ restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivered to and the date of deliver Consult postmaster for fee. 9.Article Addressed to: .. 4a.Article Number P 922 012 007 i 1.LL, S:.^.^�;1,.+� C:i - T 4b.Service Type i:5 6 �'eft'.,Sta a CERTIFIED ZA 019;0 _ 7.Date of Delivery 3 5.Signature—(Addressee) 'µ 8.Addressee's Addr ss r (ONLY if requested and fee paid.) 6.Signature—(Agent) PS Form 3811,November 1990 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT United States Postal Service _I JE 3 SF Official Business Ov F- y 6 10"' PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE,$300 Ill�wu�ll�luln�lllnu�l��lu�lul�l�lull�nll INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MA 01970-3724 POSTAGE POSTMARK OR DATE of jECJE SHOW TO WHOM.DATE AND RESTRICTED UU ADDRESS OF DEUVERY DELVER, O OERNFIED FEE+RETURN RECEIPT- - TOTAf POSTAGE AND FEES =j NO INSU .0� EPA F I WI SENT TO: NOT FOP IIreanoxaE mAlE - 0'i a. (Lru .... .,e Or Mr. 191ka Craxvlm, GH ru 1$ 5Ti161i3x5{�twi . F Er S.aeal XA 01970 UU a PS FORM 3800 a RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL o a STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES(see front). 1. It you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,leaving the receipt attached,and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier(no extra charge). 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt,write the certified-mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits.Otherwise,affix to back of article.Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorized agent of the addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt.It return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. I ��` C�itg of �tticm, ttssttrl�usrt#s ''a 13ultlic Vrnpertg Department �`�"1Ng1�"�/ Nuilibing Department One #alem l&reen 500-745-9595 Ext. 300 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property February 2, 1996 Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. Mike Garvin, General Manager Hawthorne Hotel „1 washington:Square Salem, MA 01970"' Dear Mr. Garvin, As you may recall, you were notified in June 1995 to have certain identified fire supply and domestic water service violations corrected. It is my understanding that the violations identified have yet to be corrected. Recently Schlumberger Industries reported that they were unable to install '+ a new water meter due to serious deterioration of the domestic water supply. They also reported that the Fire Supply is leaking and there is an apparent illegal domestic water tap off the fire supply. Previously, Mr. Robert Deschene and I inspected this situation and came to the agreement that the fire and water suppplies are connected and must be separated immediately. I cannot stress this point enough. The public and hotel water supplies are in immenent danger of being contaminated by the non potable water that is present in the hotel's fire suppression system. I expect to hear from you or your representative within 24 (twenty-four) hours of receipt of this letter. If I do not hear from you or a representative, legal action will be taken and the hotel 's water systems will be terminated to protect the general public and its water supply. Upon which a fire watch will be implemented. Thank you for your immediate attention regarding this hazardous situation. d Sincerely, John L. Leclerc Plumbing & Gas Inspector cc: N. LaPointe R. Deschene J. Scott C. Kent City Solicitor t ] ] NOBLIlN ASSOCIATES, L. C. II Consulting Engineers i • 1 ] I � 1 J EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY JTHE HAWTHORNE HOTEL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS , J i ' J J J SUBMITTED TO: The Hawthorne Hotel On The Common Salem,Massachusetts 01970. SUBMITTED FROM: Noblin & Associates, L. C. I _ Box 4445 •1 Portsmouth,New Hampshire 03802 DATE: May, 1997 J ONE CROWNINSHIEID z z 0 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AM01 June 2, 1997 Mr. Michael Harrington Hawthorne Hotel 18 Washington Square West Salem, Ma 01970 Re: Exterior Building Condition Survey Dear Michael: Enclosed is Noblin & Associates' assessment of the existing building envelope. Their findings, recommendations, and cost estimates are included in the report. ' Attached, I have enclosed a summary sheet of their cost estimates for the various repair items. Please review the report and would be pleased to meet at your convenience to fulfill any guideline requirements by FEMA. You may contact me at 508-532-4800 x 219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Frank Brachanow Jr, Construction Manager cc: Deborah Collier-Comins 18 CROWNIN5HIELD STREET • PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS omo • TEL(508)532-4800 F.-K (508)532-0023 MEN CROWNINSHIELD 000 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ueo- Noblin & Associates, L.C. Cost Summary of Recommendations May, 1997 Masonry-Repointing $8009000.00 Masonry-Spalled Brick 100,000.00 Masonry-Reconstruct 409000.00 Masonry-Replace 160,000.00 Lintels Stone-Epoxy Repair 49000.00 Stone-Repair Joints 309000.00 Stone-Flash Watertable 40,000.00 Windows-Repair 179000.00 Frames Windows-Repaint 40,000.00 Windows-Caulking 309000.00 Roof-Replacement 1409000.00 Roof-Parapet Flashing 409000.00 Roof-Counterflashings 16,000.00 Equipment-Staging 809000.00 General Conditions 900000.00 Fire Escape Repairs 59000.00 SUB-TOTAL $1,6329000.00 Contingency 163,200.00 TOTAL $1,795,200.00 18 CROWNINSHIELD STREET PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS . 01960 • TEL (508)532-4800 Fax (508)532-6023 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SECTION Page .I 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.0 GENERAL 3 3.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE 4 3.1 Masonry 4 3.2 Stone Elements 4 3.3 Windows 8 l 3.4 Roofs 9 J 4.0 STRUCTURAL 12 4.1 Fire Escape 12 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 14 5.1 Building Envelope 5.2 Structural 1 144 APPENDIX A- l PHOTOGRAPHS J 7 J 1 1 J � 1 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS i-r - 1.0 INTRODUCTION - r r In April and May of 1997, Noblin and Associates, L. C. performed an Exterior Building 1 Condition Survey at the Hawthorne Hotel in Salem, Massachusetts. The purpose of this Condition Survey was to assess the condition of the existing building envelope, with 1 particular emphasis on potential sources of on-going water infiltration problems. The first phase of our survey consisted of a review of the overall maintenance history of the building with the building's on-site maintenance personnel. Architectural plans for the building on file with the City of Salem were also reviewed. Visual inspections were then performed on all exterior wall and roof areas. Test cut extractions were taken on various roof - and masonry wall areas to determine the make-up of the existing structure. Various interior r areas where water infiltration problems have been noted were also inspected. L _ Our findings have been included in this report along with recommendations and cost r estimates for addressing any deficiencies noted during our survey. I, 1. ii 2 !I EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY ! THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL MAY. 1997 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT #70013 1r I I = 2.0 GENERAL CThe Hawthorne Hotel consists of a six story structure containing hotel facilities and some i ] _ commercial retail space on the first floor. The main building was constructed in 1924, with at least one additional section constructed on the Southeast comer of the building. The date J of construction for this addition is not known. Architectural plans for the building on file i with the City of Salem list H. L. Stevens of New York, New York, and Smith &Walker of + ] Boston, Massachusetts as the original architects. The building is listed in the National c Register of Historic Places as part of the Salem Common Historic District. The building consists of a load bearing masonry structure with an interior structural steel frame and composite concretelsteel flamed floor and roof slabs. The Southeast addition appears to consist of a steel framed structure with masonry veneer walls. The roof systems consist of single ply membrane systems installed over original built-up roof membranes. Windows in most areas consist of wood framed units, most of which are provided with 1 1 exterior aluminum storm windows. Windows on some areas of the rear of the building consist of metal framed units. The available history indicates the building has experienced water infiltration problems in various areas for some time. Deterioration of the exterior masonry and other wall components is evident throughout the building. At the time of our survey, the most serious _ water infiltration was reportedly occurring in the following areas: tv - The entire height of the building from the roof to the first floor on the Northwest corner of the building. 1 - From the roof to the third floor on the Southwest comer of the building. - At the fourth floor level in the 04 stack on the Southside of the building. �f - From the roof to the first floor on the Southeast side of the building. - From the roof to the first floor on the Northeast side of the building. 'J: N lA' Our investigation will address these specific areas of concern as well as the general condition of the existing building envelope. 1. � 1_ C ' 3 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 3.0 BUILDING ENVELOPE Inspection of the exterior walls consisted of visual inspections of all exterior wall areas. Upper wall areas were accessed with a one hundred and fifty foot man lift. Inspection Jof the existing roofs consisted of visual inspection of all roof areas. 3.1 Masonry The exterior walls on this building consist of solid masonry construction. This type of structural wall system is made up of multiple wythes of masonry, bonded together with header or rowlock bricks, which span multiple wythes and tie the structure together. JThe masonry on the front and sides of the building is set in a Common bond pattern with Flemish headers, with alternate headers every six courses of brick. The masonry on the rear of the building is set in a Common bond pattern with English headers, with a continuous course of headers run every six to eight courses of brick. The available structural plans for the building show the walls on the first three floors to be sixteen inches in width, with two exterior wythes of clay brick and two interior wythes of terra cotta block. The walls on the fourth through sixth floors are shown to be twelve inches in width, with two exterior wythes of clay brick and one interior wythe of block. The exterior brick on the front and sides of the building appears to be a waterstruck brick with a moderately hard, glazed finish. The brick on the rear of the building has a less Jglazed finish. Mortar joints are approximately a half inch in width. Most joints on the original building Jappear to have been repointed with a concave profile, with the mortar struck even with the exterior face of the brick on the edges of the joint and depressed along the center. The mortar joints on the Southeast addition and isolated areas of the original building have a ] weathered profile, with the mortar struck even with the exterior face of the brick at the bottom of the joint and set back slightly along the top of the joint. This appears to be the original joint profile on the building. The masonry on this building appears to be in generally fair to poor condition. The mortar joints have been previously repointed in various areas. The repointing mortar varies in color and texture in different areas. Repointing of the joints in some areas appears to have consisted of applying new mortar over the original joints with minimal preparation. Proper preparation of mortar joints to be repointed should include cutting out the original mortar to a depth of approximately a half inch to provide a proper bonding surface for the new mortar materials. 4 1 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 q SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS J Bricks on various areas of the building are worn and spalled, particularly on the rear and lightwell elevations. Repointing of the building with improper mortar may have contributed to these problems. Masonry walls should be able to absorb flexural movement from thermal stress, wind loads, etc., by slight compression and expansion of the mortar joints. For this reason, masonry mortar should be softer than the surrounding bricks, to allow the mortar joints to be compressed without overstressing the bricks. If newer, harder mortar mixtures j are applied to older walls with relatively soft brick, flexural movement in the wall can cause J the face of the brick to spall away as it is stressed by the compressed mortar joints. ] Significant cracking in the masonry was noted in various areas of the building. This damage is probably due to moisture entering the wall and freezing, which creates significant expansive pressures within the masonry. Water entering the wall through minor deficiencies will freeze, creating larger cracks and deficiencies and progressively greater water infiltration and damage. Significant cracking of the masonry was noted in the following areas: - The Northeast and Southeast elevations on the rear of the building (see Photograph#2). - The South and East elevations of the lightwell (see Photograph#3). - Areas below the stone watertable at the roof level (see Photograph#4). This cracking appears to be due to moisture infiltration from around the watertable, particularly failed vertical joints. - The North elevation,East elevation and interior parapet walls of the main ballroom (see Photograph#6). - Various areas below upper floor windows on the front and side elevations. This cracking appears to be due to moisture infiltration from around the windows. - The North side of the main boiler chimney. Some of the most severe damage to the masonry appears to be occurring at the level of the concrete roof decks below the masonry roof parapets. The available structural plans for the building show the structural concrete slabs to be set into the masonry walls approximately eight inches. The roof slab will trap and concentrate any moisture in the masonry at this level. This appears to be the cause of this cracking at the roof slab levels. Inspection of the interior attic area below the main roof showed the interior face of the masonry walls to have been coated with a waterproofing mastic. In several areas along the South side of the building and the Northwest corner, the waterproofing materials have flaked off the walls and efflorescence was noted on the wall surface. Efflorescence refers to white staining on the masonry surface caused by unreacted salts washing out of the , 5 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS mortar as water travels through the walls. This appears to be due to moisture leaching down through the wall from the roof and parapet wails above. A series of gutters were installed along the interior attic walls, reportedly over twenty years ago. This indicates the walls have been experiencing water infiltration for some time. In addition to the aforementioned areas, significant water infiltration appears to be occurring in the parapet walls on the sixth floor level on the Northeast elevation and around the main ballroom. The exposed interior masonry in the attic appears to be sound, including areas of efflorescence and other water damage. Test cuts on the parapet wall on the North side of 1 the main roof also showed the interior masonry to be sound. This indicates the walls have I not lost significant structural integrity due to moisture infiltration. However, we would anticipate some deterioration within the wall structures in isolated areas. Minor to moderate efflorescence was noted on the exterior masonry walls in several areas, Jincluding the sixth floor level in the Southwest comer and the second floor level on the North elevation. There are steel ornamental grills between the first and second floor levels on the front and sides of the building. Minor cracking of the masonry was noted around the connections for 7 these grills (see Photograph#7). The masonry above window openings is supported with loose laid steel lintels. The windows on the front and sides of the building have stone lintels set above the structural steel lintels. The available structural plans for the building show a single 4 x 4 lintel in the exterior masonry wythe,with steel channels supporting the wall behind the exterior wythe. A test cut around one window below the main chimney showed a loose laid lintel in the l exterior wythe,similar to that shown on the architectural plans. 1 The masonry around and above the windows on the rear and lightwell elevations was '1 significantly damaged in many areas (see Photograph#5). The worst damage was noted J above the windows on the rear elevation, where the masonry has bowed out by as much as an inch or more. This damage appears to be due to corrosion of the steel lintels above the windows (see Photographs#13 &#14). Corrosion can cause significant expansion of the steel and create stresses sufficient to crack surrounding masonry and mortar materials. Previous masonry repairs were noted in various areas throughout the building. Some of the largest repairs were noted above windows in the lightwell (see Photograph#1), particularly the South elevation. It appears these repairs were made to address damage to the masonry from corrosion of the steel window lintels. However, it does not appear that the lintels were replaced as part of this work. 6 f EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ' The East elevation of the lightwell has been previously coated with a solid coating (see Photograph#8). The masonry surface appears to have been prepared with a thin parging ' prior to the application of the solid coating. The coating itself is cracking and beginning to fail in many areas. The mortar joints on this wall appear to be in generally sound condition, with less severe cracking and deterioration than other areas of the building. 3.2 Stone Elements ' The exterior walls on the street elevations of the building include various cast stone J elements, including the window lintels and sills, a watertable at the roof level, vertical ' J bands at the first,second and sixth floor levels, parapet caps, exterior corners, the base of y the first floor areas, window and door surrounds on the first floor, chimney caps and ' J various other architectural details. 1 The stone elements on this building appear to be in satisfactory condition. Minor spalling ' J and cracking was noted in various areas, with more significant damage on several window sills and lintels (see Photograph#12). Some of the most significant damage was spalling of the ends of several window sills on the West elevation and one window head on the South elevation. On some of these lintels, as much as eight inches of the sill was missing. 7 Significant wearing was also noted on the watertable and main chimney cap, particularly the top surfaces. In these areas, large pieces of aggregate are exposed. The stone elements have been previously treated with various waterproof coatings. Most ' areas, except the chimney and parapet caps, appear to have been coated with a solid coating or paint The stones on the first floor level appear to have been subsequently coated with an elastomeric coating. The top of the watertable and the parapet caps on the main roof area also appear to have been coated with a mastic coating (see Photograph#9). Most of these coatings appear to be in generally satisfactory condition, with minor cracking and peeling of the coating materials. However, the coatings on the window sills and top of the watertable are in poor condition, with significant cracking and peeling of the coating materials (see Photograph#11). This may be due to the increased exposure of these surfaces to moisture, or they may not have been recoated as recently as the other elements. 1 Joints between most stones are sealed with mortar materials. These joints are in poor condition in many areas with cracking and deterioration of the mortar. The mortar joints in 7 the watertable are in particularly poor condition. In one area on the Southwest comer of the building, daylight is visible through the joint below the watertable, when viewed from the attic interior. 7 _ EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL MAY, 1997 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT #70013 Horizontal joints in the watertable and vertical joints in the parapet caps are sealed with soft sealant materials. The existing sealant materials are in generally poor condition with significant cracking, crazing and loss of elasticity. The sealant materials have failed in virtually all areas (see Photograph#10). 3.3 Windows The windows in most areas above the fust floor level consist of double-hung wood framed units provided with exterior aluminum storm windows. Windows in stairwells and other non-public areas on the East elevation and in the lightwell consist of double-hung galvanized metal framed units, some of which have been provided with exterior aluminum storm windows. Windows on the first floor levels consist of double-hung and fixed wood framed units, some of which have been retrofitted with insulated glass. 1 The original windows appear to be in generally fair condition. Moderate to severe J deterioration was noted in the exterior window frames, and particularly the wood moulding between the window frames and masonry (see Photograph#15). In some areas, openings of a half inch or more have developed in the mouldings, particularly at the base of the jambs. These openings appear to be allowing significant water infiltration during wind I driven rains. Moderate deterioration was also noted on many unpainted interior window J jambs, particularly the parting beads, which are loose or missing on some windows. The windows on the street elevations appear to have been more recently painted. Significant cracking and peeling of the paint finish was noted on many windows on the 1 East elevation and lightwell. J The aluminum storm windows appear to be in generally satisfactory condition. It was noted that, the storm windows do not completely cover the window frames and surrounding trim. This leaves various trim joints around the windows exposed to the Jweather,including the previously noted sections of deteriorated jamb moulding. The metal windows appear to be in generally satisfactory condition. Minor to moderate cracking and peeling of the paint finish was noted on many of these windows. Moderate deterioration was noted in the fixed windows and surrounding trim on the North elevation of the building. This deterioration included checking and cracking of the wood trim materials. Significant cracking and peeling of the paint finish and failure of the glazing materials was also noted on these windows. 1 8 1 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 / SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS JThe joints between the window trim or frames and masonry are sealed with various sealant materials. The existing sealant materials are in generally poor condition and have failed in many areas, with significant cracking, crazing and loss of adhesion to the underlying substrates (see Photograph#16). 3.4 Roofs The existing roof systems on the main building areas consist of fully adhered Ethylene, Propylene, Diene Monomer(EPDM) single ply membranes as manufactured by Goodyear. 7 These include the main roof, the second floor roof in the lightwell, the first floor roof over the kitchen area, the roof over the main ballroom on the Northeast comer of the building - and the roof over the Southeast addition. The existing EPDM roofs were installed in 1987. EPDM roof systems consist of individual sheets of single ply membrane bonded together with adhered seams to form a continuous roof system. The membrane in a fully adhered system is adhered to rigid insulation which is fastened to the structural roof deck. Test cut extractions were taken on each of the main roof areas. These test cuts show the systems on the main roof, second floor,kitchen and ballroom areas to consist of the fully J adhered membrane, over two inch isocyanurate insulation,over the original tar and gravel or smooth surface built-up membrane, on a concrete deck. The roof on the Southeast addition consists of the fully adhered membrane, over two inch isocyanurate insulation, over the original tar and gravel built-up membrane, with two inch fiberboard insulation over a steel deck Moisture was found below the isocyanurate insulation on the main roof and saturating the isocyanurate insulation on the kitchen roof. Laboratory analysis indicates the felts from the original built-up membranes do not contain asbestos. Inspection of the existing EPDM membranes showed them to be in generally poor condition. Repairs have been made to the field membrane in various areas. Unbonded membrane and flashing seams were also noted throughout the various roof areas (see Photograph#17). It should be noted that, EPDM membrane seams are adhered with solvent based adhesives which are susceptible to deterioration from prolonged exposure to moisture. Standing water on the membrane surface may accelerate deterioration of the adhesive seams. Moisture trapped below the roof will have a similar effect, particularly when the roof system is heated by the sun,causing the moisture to expand and migrate toward the seams. 9 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 ITHE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS IThe main roofs are pitched to internal roof drains. In several areas on the main roof, 1 second floor roof and ballroom roof, EPDM wall flashings have been adhered over relief scuppers in the parapet walls. These scuppers are no longer providing a secondary means of drainage should the roof drains in these areas become blocked. The roof perimeters on the main building areas consist of parapet walls between twelve and 1 forty-eight inches in height. The parapets are covered with cast stone caps. Test cuts on J the parapet wall on the North side of the main roof showed the original copper flashings on the inside face of the wall to extend approximately an inch and a half below the stone caps. The stone caps on the main roof area have been coated with a mastic coating with fabric reinforcement at the joints. Other parapet caps are uncoated with soft sealant at the joints. The EPDM membrane flashings have been adhered up the vertical surfaces of masonry walls, including perimeter parapet walls, and secured along the top edge with an exposed ] termination bar. In all areas except for the kitchen roof, these flashings have been installed over what appear to be the original reglet flashings on the inside face of the walls (see JPhotograph#18). These reglet flashings are typically set an inch or more into the masonry and are intended to catch water running down the wall, and drain it out of the wall before it can enter the building areas below. Proper roofing practice calls for base flashings on this type of wall to be secured below a reglet or other through wall flashing, to allow moisture to properly drain out of the wall. The EPDM membrane flashings installed over the reglets in these walls will rap any moisture which penetrates the wall, eventually forcing it around the reglet and into the building structure below. The existing flashings on the parapet walls appear to be allowing significant water infiltration into the existing roof systems and building areas below. Test cuts on the parapet wall on the North side of the main roof showed the existing EPDM wall flashings to be installed over three quarter inch fiberboard insulation on the original bituminous wall flashings. The fiberboard insulation below the EPDM flashings was 1 saturated, while the masonry materials behind the original flashings showed little sign of J water damage. A primary source of this water infiltration appears to be the top edge of the EPDM flashings. Additional water infiltration may be occurring through the parapet caps, particularly the joints where the mastic coating has Split. Similar water infiltration can be expected through the other parapet wall and masonry wall flashings. The sealant materials on parapet cap joints have failed in virtually all areas: Significant water infiltration also appears to be occurring through the parapet masonry on the ballroom, which is cracked and deteriorated in many areas. •� 10 1 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS The EPDM membrane has been terminated to exposed horizontal concrete surfaces in a 1 number of areas, including door thresholds on the main roof, the main roof entrance to the fire escape and several mechanical curbs on the kitchen roof(see Photographs#19&#20). Water penetrating the exposed concrete will enter the roof systems around these mechanical terminations. 1 Two penthouses located on the main roof have wood fascias with metal gutters. Gutter downspouts are missing from several locations. There are exposed joints in and below the wood fascias,some of which will allow water infiltration during wind driven rains. Mechanical equipment and penetrations on these roofs consist of curb mounted fans, 1 HVAC equipment and vent pipes. . J Mechanical roof fans are flashed with elastomeric flashings adhered over a concrete curb, with a metal vent cover mounted over the curb. One vent cover on the main roof seems to fit poorly on the curb, and was dislodged on several occasions during our site visits. This 1 left the curb opening exposed to the weather. J Other rooftop units include mechanical roof fans and vents flashed with elastomeric flashings adhered to the base of the metal unit. Smaller HVAC equipment is set on pressure treated wood sleepers. These sleepers should be provided with membrane slip sheets between the sleeper and roof surface. These sleepers are missing on several units on the second floor roof. ] Vent pipes are flashed with preformed elastomeric boots which fit around the pipe and are adhered to the membrane roof surface. One boot on the Southeast addition has been installed over the original copper sleeve on the pipe. Removal of the sleeve and sealing the boot to the cast iron pipe provides a more positive seal. li 1 There is a metal railing on the parapet along the Southeast comer of the main roof. This J railing is corroded completely through in several areas. There are two canopies over the entrances on the West and South elevations of the building. These canopies are covered with copper roofs, which are moderately wom and 1 pitted. The copper is stained in various areas and patina green in color, indicating it has J seen a significant portion of its service life. Mastic repairs have also been made to various -� soldered seams, indicating previous problems in these areas (see Photograph#21). ' 11 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 4.0 STRUCTURAL 1 Inspection of the existing exterior fire escape consisted of visual inspections of all sections of the fire escape platforms and stairs. 4.1 Fire Escape The building is provided with emergency egress via a five story steel framed fire escape located in the lightwell and a single platform with a counterbalanced stairway to the ground 1 on the rear of the building. J The horizontal fire escape platforms are approximately forty-eight inches in width and 1 consist of 1 1/2" x 1/4"bars set at 1 1/2" on center, with perpendicular 3/4" diameter J stiffener bars set at 16" on center. The platforms are supported by 7" x 2"channels fastened to 5" x 5" x 1/4" angle columns at the comers of the structure. Stairs between different levels of the fire escape consist of 9" treads consisting of 1 1/2"x 3/16" bars set at 1 1/2" on center, with perpendicular 3/4" diameter stiffener bars set at 16" on center. The main fire escape frame members are fastened with 5/8" bolted connections. Rail and other smaller members have 3/8" bolted connections. The fire escape is fastened to the main building with 5/8" bolts through the vertical frame members into the exterior masonry wall. Vertical steel columns were noted in the masonry wall where the fire escape is attached to the building, which may be part of the fire escape structure. The fire escape is provided with thirty-eight inch rails with 13/47 x 13/47 x 3/16" angle 1 top and bottom rails and 3/4"diameter balusters set at 8" on center. The fire escape was reportedly repainted within the last several years. Inspection of the 1 existing structure showed significant corrosion in a number of the steel members, particularly at the bolted connections in the comers (see Photograph#22). These areas are more susceptible to corrosion due to moisture trapped in the joints around the bolted connections. In some areas, this corrosion appears to have significantly reduced the structural capacity of the fire escape. Several of the bolts in the steel frame, and the bolts Jsecuring the structure to the main building, are significantly corroded. One bolt into the main building wall was noted to be corroded completely away. 12 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS The recently applied paint finish may be covering additional areas of corrosion, and the ] actual deterioration of the structure may be more significant than was apparent from this visual inspection. ] The existing fine escape on this building does not meet the requirements from the current edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code for new construction, or new fire escapes on existing buildings. However, it appears the existing fire escape would be considered adequate as an existing structure, provided it meets the minimum Code requirements for design load and maintenance. Specific sections from the Fifth Edition of the Code addressing these items are as follows: 7 - Section 805.2 requires all corrodible parts of fire escapes to be kept painted or otherwise protected against rust and corrosion. J - Section 805.3 requires all exterior fire escapes to be inspected and/or tested every five years by a Massachusetts Registered Professional Engineer or other qualified professional for certification of structural adequacy and safety. 7 - Section 821.3 requires fire escapes to be designed to support a live load of 100 pounds per square foot. A complete analysis of the structural capacity of the existing fire escape is beyond the scope of this report However, it appears that the original capacity of the fire escape has been reduced by the corrosion of the various members and bolted connections. Complete ] certification of the fire escape will require testing of the structure, which should be included as part of regular maintenance on the building. 1 1 1 J _1 J I 13 JI EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL MAY, 1997 1 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT #70013 1 1 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS To address the existing conditions and noted deficiencies at the Hawthorne Hotel, we have prepared the following recommendations. It should be noted that the estimated costs included with these recommendations are based on preliminary scopes and quantities of work. Some of these items may be combined under single contracts, thereby reducing the ] overall costs. All exterior renovation work will have to conform to the requirements of the applicable Historic Preservation Commissions. � ] 5.1 BUILDING ENVELOPE MasonEy The exterior masonry walls should be repointed in all areas of the building. All repointing work should include cutting the existing materials out of the joint to provide a sound substrate for the new mortar. The new mortar should be installed in multiple layers. Preparation and waterproofing of the exterior masonry with a clear penetrating water repellent to reduce the absorption of moisture should also be considered. The estimated cost for this work would be Eight Hundred Thousand dollars ($800,000.00). All cracked, spalled or otherwise damaged brick should be removed and replaced. Areas of major masonry cracking should be repaired by removal and replacement of all bricks 1 around the crack to ensure all materials are soundly bonded. The estimated cost for this work would be One Hundred Thousand dollars ($100,000.00). We would anticipate some reconstruction of interior wall areas will be necessary, particularly on the parapet walls and masonry walls directly below the roof levels. We would recommend that a contingency of between Twenty and Forty Thousand dollars be included for this work ($20,000.00 - $40,000.00) All steel lintels above the windows on the rear and lightwell elevations should be removed and replaced with new galvanized lintels. The estimated cost for this work would be One r Hundred and Sixty Thousand dollars ($160,000.00). 1 1 Stone Elements All deteriorated stone elements should be repaired with a high quality epoxy repair mortar. The estimated cost for this work would be Four Thousand dollars ($4,000.00). 1 14 i1 _I EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ] All existing mortar joints in the stone elements should should be cut out and repointed. All repointing work should include cutting the existing materials out of the joint to provide a 7 sound substrate for the new mortar. The new mortar should be installed in multiple layers. All existing sealant joints in the stone elements should resealed. All stone elements should then be recoated. This work should include preparation of the existing surfaces as required 1 by the coating manufacturer, including removal of any loose or otherwise unsound existing J coating materials. This work should be performed as part of regular maintenance on the 7 building. The estimated cost for this work would be Thirty Thousand dollars ($30,000.00). IThe top of the watertable should be provided with a lead coated copper cap, flashed into the masonry directly above the watertable and hooked onto the exterior face of the stone. This would reduce water infiltration into the exposed watertable and prevent a recurrence of the deterioration in the watertable mortar and sealant joints, as well as the masonry below. The Jestimated cost for this work would be Forty Thousand dollars ($40,000.00). 1 Windows All significantly deteriorated sections of the existing wooden window frames and perimeter Jtrim should be replaced with matching materials. This would include the perimeter jamb moulding where significant deterioration was noted on many openings, and water infiltration appears to be occurring. The estimated cost for this work would be Seventeen Thousand dollars ($17,000.00). Any areas of minor wood deterioration should be consolidated to stabilize the wood. Any 1 significantly deteriorated glazing materials should be removed and replaced. All exposed window frames and trim, or windows which have not been recently painted, should then be prepared by removing all loose or unsound paint materials down to the bare substrate, 1 primed and finished with a high quality paint. Prior to this work, the existing paint materials should be tested for lead. The estimated cost for this work would be Twenty-four Thousand dollars ($24,000.00). This work will require removal and reinstallation of the aluminum storm windows. An alternative to replacement, preparation and painting of the existing wood perimeter trim would be cladding the window perimeter with a heavy aluminum panning, which matches the existing trim profile. This panning could be sealed to the storm windows to provide a relatively long term,low maintenance, weathertight enclosure of the entire window opening. 15 J EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 1 Resealing of window perimeter joints should be included as a regular maintenance item in the overall maintenance program for the building. These joints should be scheduled for resealing every seven to ten years. This work should include removal of the existing materials and preparation of the underlying substrates to provide a proper bonding surface for the new materials. High quality sealant and the recommended primers should then be applied during dry,clear weather conditions in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The estimated cost for this work would be Thirty Thousand dollars ($30,000.00). Roofs 1 Due to the previous water infiltration into the existing roof and general poor detailing at the 1 parapets and other roof perimeters, we would recommend the existing EPDM roofs be i ' replaced. Although significant water infiltration into the building from the roofs does not appear to be occurring, the roofs appear to contain moisture in many areas. Additional moisture infiltration seems to be prevented largely due to the integrity of the original built- up roof and concrete deck below the existing system. i The existing roofs should be replaced with new fully adhered single ply membrane J (EPDM, PVC, etc.) systems with thermal insulation underlayment. All reroofing should 1 include removal of the existing materials down to the original built-up roof membrane on the main roof areas, and down to the structural deck on the Southeast addition. Single ply membranes should also be considered for the canopy roofs. The estimated cost of this work would be One Hundred and Forty Thousand dollars ($140,000.00). The new roof system should include complete flashing of the inside surfaces of the parapet walls, and either new metal caps over the existing stone caps, or removal, flashing and reinstallation of the stone caps. The estimated cost of this work would be Forty Thousand ] dollars ($40,000.00). The new roof system should also include new counterflashings set in the masonry at all masonry wall base flashings. The estimated cost of this work would be Sixteen Thousand dollars ($16,000.00). iMiscellaneous t We would recommend that an allowance of Eighty Thousand dollars ($80,000.00) be included for staging of the building. This assumes the above work items are performed 1 concurrently. f 16 EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL MAY, 1997 j� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT #70013 ¶ An allowance of Ninety Thousand dollars ($90,000.00) should be included for General ,I Conditions. These would include storage, waste disposal, Site protection, etc. We would also recommend that a contingency of at least ten per cent be included in the budget for this project. JI 5.2 STRUCTURAL Eire Ec aM All visibly corroded, broken or otherwise deteriorated connections and structural members 'j of the fire escape structure should be replaced. The fire escape should be visually inspected, and this type of damage repaired, on an annual basis. The fire escape should be tested and certified for structural adequacy by a Massachusetts 1 Registered Professional Engineer or other qualified professional. This testing should be performed every five years in accordance with the applicable Code requirements. 1 ] ] ] 17 � x Ada wo wF C6.O x a t 1 PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 a1 man 1 - _rte 1: Photograph#1 - Masonry Repairs On South Elevation Of Lightwell J � Photograph#2- Cracked Masonry On East Elevation 0 � s . y' PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 CPhotograph#3 - Severely Cracked Masonry Over Stairwell Door On First Floor Roof Area is r 7 r f{ Photograph#4- Cracked Masonry Below Joint In Stone Watertable c PHOTOGRAPHS THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 Photograph#5 - Damaged Mortar joints And Masonry At End Of Corroded steel _-Si4re.:i.�.y:G.T"�'.:.. _:<i-...a•+i:.� - .. ._,'.ABs•:,-_?_�_" G i- L 'I •'T►`1Sce+.:.'.-� ��."-''moi+ '_ .•,y�c:•-' � .� .ya...�'�;,_:•.-7:.�•, .rte k _ ... _ - k Window Lintel PHOTOGRAPHS THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 51 oil 4 � i 1 � 1 i Photograph LIMasonryConnection i �"`�Q i• L i�.l Y Photograph SolidCoatingOn East Elevation PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 _ THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 T,. Mali hl: :l 1 - 1 - �I Photograph#9- Watertable On West Elevation With Failed Mastic Coating .I ,I .1 �, Photograph#10-Deteriorated Sealant Joints Above Watertable Dentals J PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 i rf r Y r 1 Photograph#11 - Failed Solid Coating On Watertable On South Elevation .i . i It �I Photograph#12 -Damaged End Of Stone Window Sill On West Elevation _i PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 rl i rl .l r �i Photograph#13 - Corroded Steel Window Lintel On East Elevation a Photograph#14- Corroded Steel Window Lintel Recently Painted Over PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 I i; L, �c T ' Photograph#15- Deteriorated Wood Moulding On Window Jamb Ii I „ F Photograph#16 - Failed Sealant On Wood To Masonry Joint Around Window 1 PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 1 C . 9 C ii Photograph#17- Failed Membrane Seam On EPDM Roof r r . r � let o � a� I : (- Photograph#18 - Elastomeric Flashing On EPDM Roof Adhered Over Original Masonry Wall Base Flashing I r - PHOTOGRAPHS MAY, 1997 THE HAWTHORNE HOTEL PROJECT #70013 jo Photograph#19 - Exposed Horizontal Surface Of Concrete Curb On First Floor Roof Wow _ Photograph#20 - EPDM Membrane Terminated To Horizontal Concrete Surface On Main Roof Area I PHOTOGRAPHS THE HAWTHORNE • • JECT #70013 Photograph#21 - Mastic :i -time..,., •... ..,..y.+.-i; Repairs On opRoof - r Photograph#22 - Corroded Steel Members At Corner Connection On FIre Escape Page 2 of 4 Blog, and I post something new each and every day. Check it out by going to our website, http://www.HawthomeHotel.com and clicking on the lin ur og ori Ont-page. C From: Lucie Ogeron �O Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:26 PM To: ]uli Lederhaus Cc: Megan Campbell Subject: Plumbing Inspection on Thursday 05/26 Plumbing Inspection on Thursday 05/26: 202 210 212 301 y3 302 303 1 1� 306 �. 308 309 401 402 403 404 408 http://netmail.verizon.net/webmail/driver?nimlet=deggetemail&fn=INBOX&page=l&deg... 5/25/2011 Page 3 of 4 ' 409 410 412 501 502 504 506 508 512 601 602 603 604 606 608 610 612 Lucie Lucie Ogeron Front Office Manager http://netmail.verizon.net/webmail/driver?nimlet=deggetemail&fn=INBOX&page=l&deg... 5/25/2011 i 202 v 208 ' 210 [A`� 212 301 302 303 304 306 308 �C{, 309 3106ok 401 ' 402 403 404 408 410 412 501 502 503 506 4 available after noon 508 512 601 602 603 604 606 608 609 610 4 available after noon 612 r 18 Washington Square 589-11 . GIS#: 10750 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ,Niap — - 135 S CITY OF SALEM Black: Lot 0412-0 'Category (RENOVATIONS. Permit# _ - BUILDING PERMIT Pro tect# JS-2011 000706 Est Cost ±$771,000 00 -{ Fee Charged: '$8,486.00 Balance Due: $00 _ PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Expires Use Group; 1 _ _J Roger A Tremblay Contractors,Inc. Lot Size(sq_13) Owner: • Hawthorne Hotel ,Zoning.: __. Units Gained: ";Ap lieaht: Roger A Tremblay Contractors Inc. Units Lost: AT: 18 Washington Square Dig Safe#: ISSUED ON: 03-Feb-2011 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 03-Jul-2011 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: RENOVATION OF(10 1)BATHROOMS AS PER PLANS jbh POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas Plumbing Building Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: !Service: Meter:/� Footings: gh: Rou . Rough: Rough l�y' Foundation: Final:p7•�j — Final: Fina Rough Frame: fy/ji v.r/T.r Fireplace/Chimney: jD.P.W. Fire Health Insulation: Meter: Oil: Final: QC v YY House# Smoke: �Q q _ Treasury: Wator; Alarm: Assessor (or- C/O' Final: Sewer: Sprinklerst � - THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOL kPON,41IF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: BUII DING PEC-2011-0008 t5 03-Feb-I1 7566 58,486.00 IMPORTANT:OWNER OR CONTRACTOR MUST ARRANGE FOR PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION.SEE CURRENT 13UILDING CODE CHAPTER 1 FOR LIST OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. CALL 97"19.5641 TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION GcoTMSS 2011 Des Lauriers Munieilial Solutions, Inc. i�• • Y 1 d O 04 v` W30VE ♦0 CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT a� 2;4�c f Certificate No: 589-11 Building Permit No.: 589-11 ,j Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem Building Electrical Mechanical Permits 1 ^^ This is to Certify that the HOTEL located at ----------------------------------------------------- Dwelling Type 18 WASHINGTON SQUARE in the CITY OF SALEM ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR(PHASE II) This pertnt is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto, and expires unless sooner suspended or revoked. ------------------------------ Expiration Date --_.------ --------'---------------------------------------------------------- Issued On:Tue Jul 31, 2012 GeoTMSO 2012 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ------------ ......-- . _%^f -------------------------- 18 Washington Square 589-11 s# 570' 570 0, �, a r 7 x Y COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS P 35 ,z- gio� ck t CITY OF SALEM !Lot 0412-0 [Category W RENOVATIONS " ternnt# -x-1589-11 "° F �.. BUILDING PERMIT Project# JS-2011-000706 rFst. Cost: $771,000 00 ifss- 'Fee Charged:„ $8,486.004' lBalance Due:,,,,r $00 & PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class`! ;A:r , L VLOWS-� "i�, ' Contractor: License: Expires jUse Group 4 %'i 1 i5- Roger A Tremblay Contractors,Inc. iLot S ze(sq ft) s { 1 "„ iiZpo In. ,,„' Owner. Hawthorne Hotel sUntts Gamedt ,r t.",. Applicant: Roger A Tremblay Contractors Inc. �Unrts Lost AT: 18 Washington Square Dig Safe# , ” a ISSUED ON: 03-Feb-2011 AMENDED ON: 13-Oct-2011 EXPIRES ON: 03-Mar-2012 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: RENOVATION OF(101)BATHROOMS AS PER PLANS jbh �/o,, v POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas Plumbing._ Building Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: Service: Meter: 0412 Footings: IV p�� ( ^ / i Rough: Rough: Rough: vl\ W" Foundation: Final: lff } � � Final: Final: Rough Frame: Fireplace/Chimney; D.P.W. Fire Health Insulation: Meter: Oil: ©� / , Final: fi ` l /O House# Smoke: - 7 Assessor Treasury: // Water: Alarm: �r/q ui -Xw_ Sewer: Sprinklers: Final: THIS PERIMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON 0 A N � OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount BUILDING REC-2011-000815 03-Feb-11 7566 $8,486.00 IMPORTANT:OWNER OR CONTRACTOR ROUST ARRANGE FOR PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DUFlItdG CONSTRUCTION.SEE CURRENT BUILDING COLE CHAPTER 1 FOR LIST OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. CALL 976-619-5641 TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION GcoTMS®2011 Des Landers Municipal Solutions,Inc. -r 1 vwIL 4. YSYYE •C 1� CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT r HAWTHORNE HOTEL - BUILDING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION I DATE COMMENTS 601 602 G�rJ 603 J 604 605 Not Applicable 606 GP V/5)/I 607 Not Applicable 608 C 609 610 � l HAWTHORNE HOTEL - BUILDING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 611 Not Applicable 612 �I1g4 �d z� 501 502 503 504 505 Not Applicable 506 507 Not Applicable 508 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - BUILDING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 509 510 511 Not Applicable 512 401 402 403 404 405 Not Applicable 406 Not Applicable 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - BUILDING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 407 Not Applicable 408 409 410 411 Not Applicable 412 301 302 303 304 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - BUILDING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 Not Applicable 312 201 Not Applicable 202 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - BUILDING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM #11 ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 203 Not Applicable 204 205 Not Applicable 206 207 Not Applicable 208 209 Not Applicable 210 211 Not Applicable 212 • • • HAWTHORNE HOTEL - PLUMBING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # I ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION I DATE COMMENTS 601 602 603 604 605 Not Applicable 606 607 Not Applicable 608 609 610 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - PLUMBING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION 7 DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 611 Not Applicable 612 501 502 503 504 505 Not Applicable 506 507 Not Applicable 508 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - PLUMBING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # 11 ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 509 510 511 Not Applicable 512 401 402 403 404 405 Not Applicable 406 Not Applicable 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - PLUMBING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION I DATE COMMENTS 407 Not Applicable 408 409 410 411 Not Applicable 412 301 302 303 304 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - PLUMBING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 30S 306 307 308 309 310 311 Not Applicable 312 201 Not Applicable 202 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - PLUMBING INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 203 Not Applicable 204 205 Not Applicable 206 207 Not Applicable 208 209 Not Applicable 210 211 Not Applicable 212 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - MECHANICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # I ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 601 602 603 604 605 Not Applicable 606 607 Not Applicable 608 609 610 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - MECHANICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM# ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 611 Not Applicable 612 501 502 503 504 505 Not Applicable 506 507 Not Applicable 508 0 0 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - MECHANICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUG INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 509 510 511 Not Applicable 512 401 402 403 404 405 Not Applicable 406 Not Applicable HAWTHORNE HOTEL - MECHANICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM# ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 407 Not Applicable 408 409 410 411 Not Applicable 412 301 302 303 304 • a 0 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - MECHANICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM# ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 Not Applicable 312 201 Not Applicable 202 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - MECHANICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION I DATE COMMENTS 203 Not Applicable 204 205 Not Applicable 206 207 Not Applicable 208 209 Not Applicable 210 211 Not Applicable 212 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM #11 ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 601 602 603 604A 606 607 Not Applicable 608 609 610 r � HAWTHORNE HOTEL - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 611 Not Applicable 612 501 502 503 504 3-0I" 506 507 Not Applicable 508 • • s HAWTHORNE HOTEL - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM# ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION I DATE COMMENTS 509 510 511 Not Applicable 512 401 402 403 404 Nov 4W 406 Not Applicable • • s HAWTHORNE HOTEL - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM#11 ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION I DATE COMMENTS 407 Not Applicable 408 409 410 411 Not Applicable 412 301 302 303�p 3047 HAWTHORNE HOTEL - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM # ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 30� 3 306 307 308 4 ry v^,-y 309 310 311 Not Applicable 312 201 Not Applicable 202 i • HAWTHORNE HOTEL - ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SIGN-OFF SHEET ROOM# ROUGH INSPECTION DATE INTERIM INSPECTION DATE FINAL INSPECTION DATE COMMENTS 203 Not Applicable 204 205 Not Applicable 206 207 Not Applicable 208 209 Not Applicable 210 211 Not Applicable 212 �� / �� c� Cj V �� a� � �; . . . , . � w. � � � • D I L E D N A _r,l; D MEETING MEMORANDUM 9 91t. N1, `91 TO: Files P.E C EI VE O CITY OF SALEIA,t?ASS. FROM: Ken Bavaro DATE: February 5 , 1987 RE: r Hawthorne Hotel (#86055 . 00) .Salem, Massachusetts A meeting was held at the Salem Building Inspection Department on Monday, February 2 , 1987 , with the following in attenance : Mike Harrington Three Corners Trust Realty Jay Reis Gourdeau_Construction Company Bill Munroe Salem Building Inspection Dept Mike-Tickn f-�DDiL'eonardo International , Inc . Ken Bavaro DiLeonardo International , Inc . The purpose of the meeting was to discuss building code issues as they pertain to the above mentioned project . The following was noted: 1 . Basement Restrooms : These facilities should meet handicap requirements . DiLeonardo will address this issue . It was noted that in each restroom a watercloset will be eliminated to increase the stall width. DiLeonardo to investigate fixture count . 2 . First Floor Restrooms : DiLeonardo to investigate ire count , ve to increase capacity in mens room. Hawthorne would like to keep the coat closet and retail space as much as possible . 3 . Architect stamp required on drawings . 4 . DiLeonardo to show on plans ratings of all walls and doors , etc . S . DiLeonardo to furnish building inspector flamespread ratings of carpets , wallcoverings , etc . 6 . Stairs From Basement to First Floor : The existing construction o wilding isnon-combustible cast-in- place concrete . The building inspector feels that the stairs shall be of same material . DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL& RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Post Road.Wa w Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW USA HAWTHORNE HOTEL MEETING MINUTES February 5 , 1987 Pg. 2 of 2 7 . Partition Wall Between Restaurant and Vestibule and Lobby : The proposes wal m3 ay stay ,—prove ing a sprinkler curtain is provided to protect the wall . Gourdeau to instruct his plumbing engineer of this and to provide design. 8 . Building inspector requires bi-weekly reports from architect . The above items will be furnished on the stamped set of plans and will be forwarded as soon as possible . If your understanding on any of these items are different than that stated, please contact this office immediately so that we can resolve our misunderstandings . Sincerely, DILEONAR 0 INTERNATIONAL , INC. *ennethavaro , A. I .A. Project Architect/Manager KB/jmh cc : All attendees Sue Dyer Robin Olschan Nancy Spirito Stan DeAngelis Bill Gray Bob DiLeonardo DI LEONARD0 INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL& RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Post Road,Warwick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW U.S.A city of Safem, Wassachusetts �opF Fire Department Oavid'W. Cody 48 Laffayette Street (Fire Prevention Bufiau Odef Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 29,F,onAwnue 978-744-6990 Te1978-744-1235 ?et 978-745-7777 dco4gjalemxom q7a.X 978-745-4646 'T'ax978-745-9402 VIOLATION NOTICE Hawthorne Hotel Thursday August 30, 2007 018 Washington Square West Salem, M 01970 An inspection of your facility on Wednesday August 29, 2007 revealed the violations listed below. ORDER TO COMPLY: Since these conditions are contrary to law, you must correct them upon receipt of this notice. An inspection to determine compliance with this Notice will be conducted on TO BE DETERMINED. at / / If you fail to comply with this notice before the reinapection date listed, you may be liable for the penalties provided for by law for such violations. Violation Code Article Division Page Count 148.26F 1/2 carbon Monoxide Detectors 0 0 Your establishment is in violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 148 section 26F 1/2 . Carbon Monoxide Detectors to be installed FORTHWITH. Every dwelling, building or structure, including those owned or operated by the commonwealth, occupied in whole or in part for residential purposes, that: (1) contains fossil-fuel burning equipment including, but not limited to, a furnace, boiler, water heater, fireplace or any other apparatus, appliance or device that burns fossil fuel; or (2) incorporates enclosed parking within its structure shall be equipped by the owner with working, approved carbon monoxide alarms in conformance with the requirements of the board of fire prevention regulations; provided, however, that such requirements shall include, but not be limited to, a requirement that a landlord or superintendent shall install either approved monitored battery-powered alarms or approved electrical wiring alarms as defined by the board, as are required to make the alarms operational at the beginning of any rental period by lease or otherwise and shall maintain VO 39Vd HDiddSIQ 3NId W3_1VS ZOV69vtets OE:LL LOOVOL/60 City fs it o alem, 9Yassachusetts Fire (Department nnr v 48 Laffayette Street Davi6'W. Coi1y Sarem, Wassachusetts 01970-3695 Tire Q'rmntion(bureau Chief 29 Fort Avenue 978-744-6990 Ter978-744-1235 7ef978-745-7777 dco6y0salent,com ('ak978-745-4646 `Fa,978-745-9402 VIOLATION NOTICE Hawthorne Hotel Thursday August 30, 2007 018 Washington Square west Salam, HA 01970 and, if necessary, replace batteries or such battery-operated or electric hardwired carbon monoxide alarms annually thereafter to insure their continued operabili r X Griffin, Liaut, BrigoUli Lederhaus Inspeot0r Oaoupant/Owner Cc: ief Building Health Licensing 06/30/2007 15:29 Page 2 90 39Vd HSiCdSIQ 3JId W3-1VS d0769Vt8L6 OE:L- L00d/01/60 J FILE COPY . 1'S City of Salem,Wassachusetts k*)Al Fire Department Vavid'W. Cody 48 Laffayette street Chief Safem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 -A n Bureau f 29�'on�vertue 978-744-6990 Tef978-744-1235 4e[978.745-7777 dcody@saam.com T'a(978-745-9402 �'a.�978-745-0646 VIOLATION NOTICE Hawthorne Hotel Thursday August 30, 2007 018 Washington Square West Salem„ MA 01970 An inspection of your facility on Wednesday August 29, 2007 revealed the violations listed below. ORDER TO COMPLY: Since these conditions are contrary to law, you must correct them upon receipt of this notice. An inspection to determine compliance with this Notice will be conducted on TO BE DETERMINED. at / / If you fail to comply with this notice before the reinspection date listed, you may be liable for the penalties provided for by law for such violations. Violation Code Article Division Page Count 148.26E 1/2 Carbon Monoxide Detectors 0 0 Your establishment is in violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 148 section 26F 1/2 . Carbon Monoxide Detectors to be installed FORTHWITH. Every dwelling, building or structure, including those owned or operated by the commonwealth, occupied in whole or in part for residential purposes, that: (1) contains fossil-fuel burning equipment including, but not limited to, a furnace, boiler, water heater, fireplace or any other apparatus, appliance or device that burns fossil fuel; or (2) incorporates enclosed parking within its structure shall be equipped by the owner with working, approved carbon monoxide alarms in conformance with the requirements of the board of fire prevention regulations; provided, however, that such requirements shall include, but not be limited to, a requirement that a landlord or superintendent shall install either approved monitored battery-powered alarms or approved electrical wiring alarms as defined by the board, as are required to make the alarms operational at the beginning of any rental period by lease or otherwise and shall maintain L0 39dd HDiVdSIQ 3bId W3-1VS Z0b69bL8L6 0Z:LL LOOZ/OI/60 Cit fSafem, 9Yassachusetts (Fire (Department David`W. Cody 48 Gaffayette Street Fire�Pree�ention Bureau . Cw Salem, Massac(tusetts 01970-3695 29 Port-Avenue 978-744-6990 Te[978-744-1235 7et978-74.5-7777 dcodyesalenacom ('a.)C978-745-4646 `Fa.X978-745-9402 VIOLATION NOTICE Hawthorne Hotel Thursday August 30, 2007 Ole Washington Square West Salem, MA 01970 and, if necessary, replace batteries or such battery--operated or electric hardwired carbon monoxide alarms annually thereafter to insure their continued operabili X Griffin, Lieut, Sri Juli Lederhaus Inspector Occupant/Owner CC: C ief Building Health Licensing 08/30/2007 15:24 Page 2 60 30Vd HCiddSIQ 3K_d W31VS Z0b6SbL8L6 OZ:LL LOOZ/0I/60 City of Salem, Massachusetts �D Fire Department 48 Lafayette street Dand 9N Cady Salem, .'Massachusetts 01970•,169= Chief Tel. 978-744-1235 Fire Prevention 978-744-6990 Bureau Fax 978-745-4646 dcod�sa/em.com 97e-745-7777 Cdpy October 3, 2007 Juh Lederhaus H&C Service Corporation D13A The Hawthorne Hotel 18 Washington Square Salem MA. 01970 Under the provisions of M.G.L.c.148, s.26G 1/2, 4h paragraph, your facility may be used as a u p rp nightclub, dance hall, discotheque,or similar entertainment oses on a temporary basis without the need to install an adequate system of automatic sprinklers under this section. Temporary use is allowed only if a permit is issued for such use by the head of the fire department in consultation with the building inspector. The terns and conditions of the permit are at the discretion of the head of the fire department who will set the terms and conditions to protect the public against fire and preserve safety, Jab, I have spoken with Tom St Pierre and have seen your request for a detail the night of the Halloween Ball October 27, 2007. Please consider this your permit to hold the above-mentioned event. Restriction: No open flames or lit candles No smoking I am enclosing a letter from Lt. Griffin with information on seasonal decorations. Please let me know the number of tickets sold for this event and have available for the 27th a roster of your staff that will be on duty the evening of the 27", Sign David W. Co Chief of Dep em Cc. Tom St Pierre Lt Erin Griffin Z0 39Gd HDiVdSId 3bId W31VS Z0b69bL8L6 bT:91 L00Z/60/0T a � BOND BOND NO. 08BSEEWS445 Know All Men By These Presents, Thatwe, Crane & Rigging Services LLC Of 15 Madison Street, Plainville, MA 02762 as Principal, and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Indiana having its principal office in the City of Indianapolis Indiana as Surety are held and firmly bound unto Dept. of Public Works, City of Salem, MA in the sum of one Thousand Dollars($ 1, 000 ) lawful money of the United States, for which payment well and truly to be made,we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Whereas, the above bounden Principal has been granted a Street Obstruction Permit at 18 Washington Square, Salem, MA 01970 Now, Therefore, the Condition of this Obligation is Such, that if the above Principal shall indemnify and save harmless the Dept. of Public Works, City of Salem, MA --- - against loss to which the Dept. of Public Works, City of Salem, MA may be subject by reason of said Principal's breach of any ordinance, rule or regulation relating to the above described license or permit, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The term of this bond is for a period beginning on the 18th day of December 20 07 and ending on the 18th day of December 2008 No cause of action shall lie against the surety unless commenced within two years from the date the cause of action accrues against the principal. e Signed, sealed and dated this 18th day of December 20 07 -.n ,.(Seal): ' Crane & Aigglnq Services LLC yJ (Seal) :r Suret- (Seal) Hartford casualty Insurance company (Seal) Form 53514.1 Attorney- in -- Fact, Ellen M. Dolan Direct Inquiries/Claims to: THE HARTFORD POWER OF ATTORNEY P.O.BOX 210,690 ASYLUM AVENUE HARTFORD,CONNECTICUT 06115 call:888-266-3488 or fax:860-757-5835) KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT: Agency Code:08 080198 Hartford Fire Insurance Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut 0 Hartford Casualty Insurance Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut Twin City Fire Insurance Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana Hartford Insurance Company of Illinois,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Illinois Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Florida having their home office in Hartford, Connecticut(hereinafter collectively referred to as the"Companies")do hereby make, constitute and appoint, up to the amount of UNLIMITED , DONNA M. ROBIE, FRANK W. ENGLAND, FRANK J. SMITH, ELLEN J. YOUNG, CHRISTINA D. HICKEY, EILEEN M. RYAN, WILLIAM J. DOBBINS, JR. , ELLEN M. DOLAN OF NATICK, MASSACHUSETTS their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety(ies)only as delineated above by ®, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof,on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons,guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. In Witness Whereof,and as authorized by a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Companies on January 22,2004,the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by its Assistant Vice President and its corporate seals to be hereto affixed,duly attested by its Assistant Secretary. Further, pursuant to Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Companies, the Companies hereby unambiguously affirm that they are and will be bound by any mechanically applied signatures applied to this Power of Attorney. V. g a' to �1�i r «„ ! «atxt gB1HjC79 Sorg' '4 79t9 l Y f yy YYP R«v� J • t,.011v hOMv` `t1 Paul A.Bergenholtz,Assistant Secretary M.Ross Fisher,Assistant Vice President STATE 0 F CON N ECTICUT ss. Hartford COUNTY OF HARTFORD On this tat day of February,2004,before me personally came M. Ross Fisher,tome known,who being by me duly sworn,did depose and say: that he resides in the County of Hartford,State of Connecticut;that he is the Assistant Vice President of the Companies,the corporations described in and which executed the above instrument;that he knows the seals of the said corporations;that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such corporate seals; that they were so affixed by authority of the Boards of Directors of said corporations and that he signed his name thereto by like authority. �S E.40 1MrNl� PT� �q�d Scott E.Paseka Nectar,Public CERTIFICATE My Commission Expires October 31,2012 I,the undersigned,Assistant Vice President of the Companies,DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies,which is still in full force effective as of December 18, 2007 Signed and sealed at the City of Hartford. ^' I.f t00t '" /> vn.•ry aY,r.ng' �+� jt`�euW. Tai«jH10F y ;e7Q « "aT l4� �hn YYP a R«vr � E htivp v �R. ,r Gary W.Stumper,Assistant Vice President POA 2007 s e:. Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN,SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)745-9595 EXT.311 FAX(978)740-0404 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed: ❑ Construction ❑ Moving ❑ Reconstruction ❑ Alteration ❑ Demolition ❑ Painting Signage ❑ Other work as described below will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. District: Washington Square Address of Property: 18 Washington Square (Hawthorne Hotel) Name of Record Owner: Dorothy Harrington Description of Work Proposed: Installation of 24"x 30"sign per photograph & drawing submitted to be located over existing plaque. Sign is made of ply-metal with background to be black& copper, lettering to be three dimensional gold and ornamentation to be gilded. Ply-metal to be placed over solid wood frame with cut-out in rear for existing plaque to be set in. Wood sides to be painted black. Dated: February 22, 2001 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: The homeowner has the option not to commence the work(unless it relates to resolving an outstanding violation). All work commenced must be completed within one year from this date unless otherwise indicated. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings(or any other necessary permits or approvals)prior to commencing work. Business Certificate �oNp.4-„>� �O UP of *aiem, f$Iaggacbugett5 0 DATE FILED Dec , Mf Expiration Date q 0 0 Type 13Re Renewal, no change Number— 1 2 Z ❑ Renewal with change In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended, the undersigned hereby declare(s) that a business is conducted under the title of: LiUNS G4-TE at. W1 5/f/NGTON S c,1 LlA /fA-cJ Fly-0KNL /�o TEL type of business G//` T 5 hw by the following named person(s): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer) Full Name Residence Ta P es _7 �Kerr� sem. Sig-«2 /7� Signatures - --- ------�!=� ------ ------------ ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- on to -t o the above named penon(s) personally appeared before me and made an oath tPate foregoing statement is true. CITY CLERK Notary Public (seal) Date Commission Expires identification Presented State Tax I.D. # S.S. # C) (if available) In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chapter 110, Section 5, of Mass. General Laws, business certificates shall be in effect for four(4) years from the date of issue and shall be renewed each four vears thereafter. A statement under oath must be filed with the town clerk upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subject to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($$300.00) for each month during which such violation continues. v4' i k 3 AIN CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF HEALTH Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3928 JOANNE SCOTT, MPH,RS,CHO NINE NORTH STREET HEALTH AGENT February 26, 1998 Tel:(978)741-1800 Fax:(978)740-9705 Three Comer Realty Trust Go Michael Harrington 18 Washington Square West Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Mr. Harrington In accordance with Chapter III, Sections 127A and 1278 of the Massachusetts General Laws, 105 CMR 400.00; State Sanitary Code, Chapter I: General Administrative Procedures and 105 CMR 410.00: State Sanitary Code, Chapter II: Minimum Standards of Fitness for Human Habitation, an inspection was conducted of the property located at 18 Washington Sq.W. occupied by Hawthorne Hotel conducted by Virginia Moustakis, Senior Sanitarian, on Monday, February 23, 1998 at 9:30 A.M.. Notice: If this rental unit is occupied by a child or children under the age of 6 years, it is the property owner's responsibility to ensure that this unit complies fully with 105 CMR 460.000: Regulations for Lead Poisoning Prevention and Control. For further information or to request an inspection, contact the Salem Health Department at 741-1800. You are hereby ORDERED to make a good-faith effort to correct the violations listed on the enclosed inspection report. Failure on your part to comply within the time specified on the enclosed inspection report will result in a complaint being sought against you in Salem District Court. Time for compliance begins with receipt of this Order. Should you be aggrieved by this Order, you have the right to request a hearing before the Board of Health. A request for said hearing must be received in writing in the office of the Board of Health within 7 days of receipt of this Order. At said hearing, you will be given an opportunity to be heard and to present witness and documentary evidence as to why this Order should be modified or withdrawn. You may be represented by an attomey. Please also be informed that you have the right to inspect and obtain copies of all relevant inspection or investigation reports, orders and other documentary information in the possession of this Board, and that any adverse party has the right to be present at the hearing. Please be advised that the conditions noted may enable the occupant(s) to use one or more of the statutory remedies available to them as outlined in the enclosed inspection report form. F the Board of H Ith: Reply to: oanne Scott Virginia Moustakis Health Agent Senior Sanitarian cc:Fire Preventi , Building Inspect r, Maureen Kerkovich (Hotel Manager), & Ed Turner(Maintenance) Certified Mail q 9 293 0 JS/sjk�-..h.'at Page 1 of SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT 9 North Street , SalemMA 01970 State Sanitary Code, Chapter 11: 105 CMR 410.000 Minimum Standards of Fitness for Human Habitation Occupant: �O/!7//�d 7 �iPo� �asr nems ��fF2rnR Phone: %4',V Address: /f¢zrlrrfaPlvc /-/0=--j— Apt.�acu4X r Floor 4 pr-r� ln,ehaec_ f/aexl*77e-r ��TT'' Owner. r7tierc CaxNr o /Q -q1=tW rxvs-r Address: /S IZ&& fiv 7ew i � Siz�om, �'lcx. [9/970 Inspection Date: 2/Q [ Time- /fin Conducted By: V./�c'USia �!S Accompanied By:F(-2e e- L t eb cl-U Anticipated Reinspection Date: jt4o/Ve_l-I d�KYZ-'7vlLou'p1in� r /yf 2LC/r'pa� Specified Reg # Violation / Time 410. . . . s �6 ek soo n/GOti!/ �trJ dzZMQeedr S a e oe?n tIzIpe i V �- L _ a u i &u o"S I One or more of the above violations may endanger or materially impair the health, safety and well-being or the occupants(s) / Code Enforcement Inspector Este es un documento legal imponanle. Puede que afecte sus derechos. Puede adquimmna traduccion de esta forma. Page —�of 3 / ��yr •� SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT Date: ?-R3-9,r 1 � 9 NorthA- 0 Salam,.MA 01970. Name: llri+iY-02Ne- //vr7n- Address: IF Specified Reg # Violation Time 410. . . . �j P J�a6edl 6 Qtzq/,7 aACfd n- e S • .✓ o ' SL?r Ni C014. 1&k5" e Ll r e - o v L/ // C �l - < - ' L_ OG/e TU v 1 61-0--pd u ? -T r - P " .r /v a /1/T 7' , ZT T ! � FEB 23 ' 96 9: 54 FROM 703 749-4399 PAGE . 002 LEXINGTON MORTGAGE COMPANY Now 3EAa�Clcm� 8614 WfiSl9/000 C� Q DRry 14 WnsliWOSU Row sum 620 Surto 302 Va;.vnn.VMa A 22182-2233 PawcT.'roN luvcr[on.NJ 095.10 609-799-8383 703-79Q-8600Tmrm 1 703-749-4399 -[nl,ecovrc.Q 609-799-92ZB February 23, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE.&US MAIL I Mr.Leo Tremblay Building Inspector/Zoning Officer One Salem Green 2nd Floor Salem,MA 01970 RE: Hawthorne Hotel 18 Washington Square West Salem,MA 01970 Dear Mr.Tremblay: Lexington Mortgage Company is currently underwriting a loan to be secured by the referenced property. In connection with this process,we are required to verify from the local jurisdiction that the hotel is in compliance with its zoning designation,use,and conformity.It would be greatly appreciated if you would address and/or confirm the items below: 1. How is the land,oonn which the Hawthrone Hotel is constructed,zoned? At/ ,i 2. Is the Property subject only to the use restrictions generally applicable to that classification, which is contained in the local jurisdiction's Zoning Ordinance? �o Please enclose a copy of the sections of that ordinance applicable to the property. Also enclose a copy of the zoning section sheet indicating the zoning classification for the property. (Please insert information on specific zoning or other land use approvals,and attach appropriate confirmatory materials.) FEB 23 ' 96 9 : 55 FROM 70� 749-4399 PAGE . 003 February 23, 1996 Page Two 3. Please check the following statements which are applicable to the referenced property; _The Property is nonconforming as to its use. -,4 The Property is nonconforming as to its structures. _The Property is nonconforming as to both its use and structures. _The Property is legally nonconforming as to its use. The Property is Iegally nonconforming as to its structures. The Property is legally nonconforming as to both its use and structures. (Please submit a copy of the sections of the ordinance applicable to nonconforming uses and/or structures.) 4. To the best of your knowledge,is the Property nonconforming in any respect? If yes,please explain. t 5. In the event of casualty,can the Property be rebuilt substantially to its current form (i.e., no loss of number of rooms, same building footprint)? If no,please explain the condition(s) and/or limitation(s)which must be satisfied. Sa P 4 (Please insert specific requirements concerning resumption of construction activity or completion,compliance with new building codes,zoning or subdivision requirements such as; buffering;setbacks;parking;landscaping; impact-related development fees; and processing requirements.) 6. is the current use of the Property,which the present owner uses for lodging purposes,a permitted use under the local jurisdiction's Zoning Ordinance, such that there is no need for any rezoning, special exception,use permit or variance?If no,please explain. VQ s 7. Do the Property comply with,or is otherwise exempt from, applicable subdivision re lations? If not,please explain. e IV FEB 23 ' 96 9: 55 FROM 703 749-4399 PAGE . 004 AI Mr. Leo Tremblay February 23, 1996 Page Four 13. Are you aware of: (i) the existence of any violations or alleged violations of any zoning, subdivision, or similar ordinances or regulations applicable to the Property? /J 6 ii) any enforcement proceedings against the Property that are pending or c ntemplate Please list any. iii) the existence of any violations or alleged violations of any building,housing code or similar ordinances or regulations applicable to the Property? _ 4 -A Signed: Title: Dater Thank you for your assistance with the above questions. Please call me at 703-749-4377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LEXINGTON MO TGAGE COMPANY Mar A.McGove Vice President ** TOTAL PAGE . 004 ** HAWT HORN E February 7, 1996 HOTEL John L. LeClerc City of Salem Plumbing & Gas Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Ma. 01970 Dear Mr. LeClerc, I wanted to follow up on our meeting this morning and get this matter resolved. I now have a complete understanding of what has to be done. As you know it was unfortunate our plumber did not attend the meeting. Buddy has contacted a new plumber and I will be back in touch with you within the week, as to when we can schedule the necessary repairs. Thanks for your patience in this matter. Sincerely, Michael F. Garvin General Manager HISTORIC'. HOTELS,/ National The ,% for Historic ERIC On The Common, Salem, MA 01970 (508) 744-4080 a Fax (508) 745-9842 Preservation Art. VIII SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE NONCONFORMITY ARTICLE VIII. NONCONFORMITY tecting the public safety, upon order of such offi- cial. Sec. 8.1. Intent. (e) Any use for which a special permit is granted j al Within the districts established by this or- as provided in this ordinance shall not be deemed dinance or amendments that may later be adopted, a nonconforming use. lots, structures and uses of land and structures exist which were lawful before this ordinance was Sec. 8.2. Nonconforming lot. passed or amended but which would be prohib- ited, regulated or restricted under the terms of Where a lot or lots exist which could not be this ordinance or future amendment. built upon for residential purposes under the terms b) Nonconformities shall not be enlarged upon, of this ordinance by reason of restriction-on lot expanded or extended nor be used as grounds for area or lot width; such lot or lots may be used, adding other prohibited structures or uses else- subject to the following provisions: where in the same district. A nonconforming use (1) Any increase in area, frontage, width,yard of a structure, a nonconforming use of land, or a or depth requirements of a zoningordinance nonconforming use of a structure and land shall or by-law shall not apply to a lot for single- not be extended or enlarged by attachment on a and two-family residential use which,at the building or premises of additional signs which are time of recording or endorsement, which- intended to be seen from off the premises or by the ever occurs soon sPEIEUt addition of other uses of a nature which would be oiWie�i>gn n- prohibited generally in the district involved. Pro- formed`tq Shen a and vided, however, and notwithstanding any other had less t abut provisions of this ordinance to the contrary, an at leas ffve ousand(5,000):sq, Feet of existing nonconforming building or use may be area and fifty(501 feetoffi•o itag a pro- altered or enlarged in that use, subject to the visions of this section shall not be construed granting of a permit therefor by the board of ap- to prohibit a lot being built upon if, at the peals as provided in section 9-4 herein. time of the building, building upon such lot -c) Nothing in this ordinance shall be deemed is not prohibited by the Salem Zoning Or- to require a change in the plans, construction or dinance. designated use of any building for which a building (2) If two (2) or more lots, or combinations of permit was issued prior to the notice of hearing lots and portions of lots, with continuous before the planning board, provided that actual frontage in single ownership are of record construction shall begin within six(6)months after less than five (5) years at the time of adop- the permit is issued and shall be diligently car- tion of this oidinance, and if all or part of ried on until completion of the building. "Actual the lots do not meet the requirements for construction" is hereby defined to include the lot width and area as established by this placing of construction materials in permanent ordinance, such lots may be built upon for position and fastened in a permanent manner. single-family residential use within_a pe- Where demolition or removal of an existing riod not exceeding five (5) years from the i building has been substantially begun prepara- date of such recording, provided that the tory to rebuilding, such demolition or removal lots each have a minimum area of five thou- shall be deemed to be actual construction, pro- sand (5,000) square feet and a minimum vided that work shall be diligently carried on until frontage of fifty (50) feet. completion of the building involved. (3) If two (2) or more lots, or combinations of (d) Nothing in this ordinance shall be deemed lots and portions of lots, with continuous to prevent the strengthening or restoring to a safe frontage in single ownership are of record condition of any building or part thereof declared for more than five (5) years at the time of to be unsafe by any official charged with pro- adoption of this ordinance,and if all or part 50 i NONCONFORMITY SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE Art.VIII, §8-5 of the lots do not meet the requirements for increased in height, except as provided for lot width and area as established by this in section 8-6. However, if such structure ordinance, the lands involved shall be con- used for single- or two-family residential sidered to be an undivided parcel for thepurposes can be enlarged or altered in con- purpose of this ordinance, and no portion of fortuity with the lot coverage, front yard, I said parcel shall be used or sold which does side yard, rear yard and distance require- not meet lot width and area requirements require- ments Table I of Article V1,said enlarge- established by this ordinance,nor shall any ment or alteration shall not be deemed an division of the parcel be made which leaves increase in the nonconformity of the struc. remaining any lot with width or area below ture and permissible even though the lot the requirements stated in this ordinance. area and lot width are noncon Sec. 8.3. Nonconforming use of land. (* bo suc structure be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than fifty (50) Where use of land exists that is made no longer .- pertentofits replacement cost or more than permissible under the terms of this ordinance or fifty(50)percent of its floor area at the time amendment,such use may be continued so long as of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the fol- except in conformity with the provisions of lowing provisions: this ordinance. (1) Such nonconforming use shall not be en- (3) Should such structure be moved for any larged, increased or extended to occupy a reason for any distance whatsoever,it shall greater area of land than was occupied at thereafter conform to the regulations for the effective date of adoption or amend- the district in which it is located after it is ment of this ordinance. moved. (2) No such nonconforming use shall be moved sec. 8.6. Nonconforming use of structure. in whole or in part to any other portion of the lot or parcel occupied by such use at the If a use of a structure or a structure and pre- effective date of adoption or amendment of mises in combination exists that would not be al- this ordinance. lowed in the district under the terms of this ordi- (3) If any such nonconforming use of land is nance or amendment, the use may be continued discontinued for any reason for a period of so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to twelve (12) consecutive months, any subse• the following provisions: quent use of such land shall conform to the (1) No existing structure devoted to a use not regulations specified by this ordinance for permitted by this ordinance in the district the district in which such land is located. in which it is located shall be enlarged, ex- tended, constructed, reconstructed, moved Sec. 8.4. Nonconforming structure. or structurally altered, except in changing Where a structure exists which could not be the use of the structure to a use permitted in the district in which it is located. built under the terms of this ordinance by reason of restrictions on area, lot coverage, height, yard (2) .Any nonconforming use may be extended dimensions, or other characteristics of the struc- throughout any parts of a building which ture or its location on the lot, such structure may were manifestly arranged or designed for be continued so long as it remains otherwise such use at the time of adoption or amend- lawful, subject to the following provisions: ment of this ordinance,but no such use shall (1) No such structure may be enlarged or al- be extended to occupy any land outside such tered in a way which increases its noncon- formity, except as provided for in section (3) On any building devoted in whole or in part 8-6. In addition, such structure may not be to any nonconforming use, work may be 51 /� Iry co ��Q��T NDI Titg of 3ttleut, Mttsstttliuse#ts 17 It Department of Public 1*eruira 9�Q`m"Ep9�� (ane Sttletu (6reen 745-9595 Ext. 321 CHARLES F. QUIGLEY City Engineer _ Director of Public Services DATE: January 3, 1996 TO: Mike Garvin, General Manager Hawthorne Hotel 18 Washington Square Salem, MA 01970 FROM: Charles F. Quigley, P.E. Director of Public Services RE: Health and Safety Violations/ Water Supply Suspension Dear Mr. Garvin, As you may recall, you were notified in June 1995 to have certain identified fire supply and domestic water service violations corrected. It is my understanding that the violations identified have yet to be corrected. Recently Schlumberger Industries reported that they were unable to install a new water meter due to serious deterioration of the domestic water supply. They also reported that the Fire Supply is leaking and there is an apparent illegal domestic water tap off the fire supply. Previously Salem Cross Connection Inspector, Bob Deschene, has notified hotel management that the required backflow prevention valve on the fire supply has not been installed. This is a health code violation . Please contact me immediately regarding these serious City and State health and safety code violations with a plan for making the required improvements. Corrective work is to start no later than January 15, 1996. In the event this work is not in progress we will be required to discontinue water service to the Hotel. . Sincerely Charles F. Quigley, P.E. cc: Norman LaPointe, fire protection: R. Deschene, Cross Connection Inspector. Joanne Scott, Public Health Agent: C. Kent, Water Department: R. Ledoux, City Solicitor CITY OF SALEM JOB w. ENGINEERING DIVISION SHEET NO. OF One Salem Green CALCULATED BY DATE ac-dom Salem, MA 01970 CHECKED BY DATE (508) 745-9595 x-327 SCALE - . ..ccs .. ` . e Nom\ �. ` \ _ VA209Z (:5; dVY.....Ij2- 1�✓ o _v '42 7' . . . Q,ov v rte. c �v� v� ��2 .. .\ v v a S ._. ` \ Vis . .... .... .. . ... . V AV........ .V .......1 61JY� ......... .... .._ 1 .... .: ....... : ...... :.... .. ..... ...... .. ........ .....:._ i Business Certificate clip of 6aiem, ffla99aE#9Ctt5 I a� 1 DATE FILED Type: 'Z-lNew Expiration Date Zt1597 Zl Renewal, no change Number %1 'J/1�5 ':3 Renewai with change In conformity with the provisions of Chanter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts Generai Laws,as amended, the undersigned hereby deciare(s) that a business is conducted under the title of: e 31/ WqS � Ov JQ✓N �T10 rC' IA w.��pr n� type of business eta °P by the following named person(s): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer; //11 Full Name Residence U (9 o (J ;Gtnol45 l9• PapaGostaHte-100 - SKeJs.i SfiJeef Sy �ew �'�I. • Si-natures 1)-- -- -- - ---a- ------------ ----------------------------------------------------- on 19-.Ethe above named person(s) personally appeared before me ::rid made an oath that th foregoing statement is true. G "---------- --- -------------------------------------------------- CITY CLERK Notary Public (seai) Date Commission txoires Identification Presented State Tax I.D. # S.S. n 6 1 ,? -50 /x'Z (if available) —•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — . ---------------- In —•—•- -•—•—•—In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chaoter 110;Section 5, of Mass. General Laws, business certificates shall be in effect for four(4) years from the date of issue and shall be renewed each four Years thereafter. A statement under oath must be riled with the town c erk upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subiect to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each month during which such violation continnes. ®SENDER:Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired,and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space on the reverses'tde. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return•^^ ' t fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and the date of delive ..For additional fees thel�p.ilowing services are available.Consult heck box postmaster for fees end c (as)for additional semice(s)'requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery. 3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article Number Hawthorne Hotel P 154 217 441 c/o Kenneth Boyles Type of Service: 18 Washington Sq. , West Registered ❑ Insured Certified ❑ COD Salem,MA 01970 Express Mail Always obtain signature of addressee or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5.Signature—Addressee 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if X requested and fee paid) 6.Signature—Agent 7.Date of Delivery PS Form 3811,Feb.198611,4,�;416 Rn,mxle Z(: DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 5 OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS �w. ""� Print your name,address,and ZIP Code -� r. n in the space below. •Complete items 1,2,3,and 4 an 23 DEC the reverse. ' ,� Mp14, •Attach to front of article if space permits,otherwise affix to back of article. •Endorse article"Return Receipt PENALTY FOR PRIVATE Requested"adjacent to number. USE. $300 RETURN Print Sender's name,address,and ZIP Code in the space below. TO James Santo - Buildirn Dept . City Hall Annex One Salem Green Salem.MA 01970 � a. P 154 217 441 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) i 4 Sent to� D c14 Str [and o. JJLJm m P.O,Ste an ZIP C e O i [7 Postage $. tll * Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee i Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered - m Return receipt showing to whom, o, Date,and Address of Delivery o TOTAL Postage and Fees $y cPostmark or Date �i E `o LL N a STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST-CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article' leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article,date,detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. It you want a return receipt,write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits.Otherwise,affix to back of article. Endorse front of article. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt.If return receipt is re- quested,check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6.Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. CON Ct� of 4ffisqar4ilsetts Public VropertU Peparttnent ��"fo�MMt�p"'4� �uilliuq �lepttrtment (Our �*-alew (6rren 7-13-02 13 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Ass't Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. December 22, 1987 .The7Hawthorne`HoCe1--r kd8 Wash-i7ngton-_Square -West icC/o General Manager Kenneth Boyles Salem,MA 01970 RE: Chimney Fire, Lounge Fire Place Dear Mr. Boyles, This is the second fire of this type in said fire place. This is a notice not to use the lounge fire place, until it has been relined or repaired to a safe condition Certified in writing from a Chimney repair company to this office. Respectfully, t James D. Santo Assistant Building Inspector JDS/eaf , r /Pevreweel c✓o,ele Powe inCITY G= StLEH S BALANCE FORWARD i 1 1 Q� A SVFG r USF I DON THIBODEAU C`J� DATE— J 1 ( 1��LN O� LC ��GilISV ULMS��Gi�L� GCC JOB \ I RE: V Gourdeau Construction Company, Inc. We are sending you herewith 1. FOR APPROVAL 6. APPROVED ❑ under separate cover 2. FOR FINAL APPROVAL 7. APPROVED AS NOTED 3. FOR QUOTATION BY 8. REVISE & RESUBMIT 4. FOR YOUR USE 9. DISAPPROVED 5. No.Copies Sheet No. Date Description Action D GENERAL REMARKS: e Founded in 1927 By� 203 Willow Street South Hamilton, MA 01982 (617)468-3511 `A�j91 cc: City Clerk Building Inspector , S Salem Historical Commission CIN HALL. SALEM. MASS. 01970 _ 744-4580 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction (X) ; .. demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration ( ); painting ( ) ; sign or other appurtenant fixture ( ) work as described below in the . . . Salem Common Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Property: 18 Washington Square West Name of Record Owner: c rC / D.B.A v^•.. h o u�rAi DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Alteration of doorway on Hawthorne .Blvd. facade to former Sweet Scoops shop as per drawing submitted January 7 , 1987, revised January 21 , 1987 . will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per . 'the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts` Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: February 6, 1987 SALEM HISTORICAL C0MMISSION � ByJV ti?�I�� `c V Chairman Awa: ti\ cc: City Clerk Building Inspector Salem Historical Commission CITY HALL, SALEM. MASS. 01570 745-9595, ext. .311 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that, the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration ( ) ; painting ( ) ; Sign or other appurtenant fixture W work as described below in the . . . 0 Washington Square _Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Property:: l8`Wahington Sq. We-s-t=(Hawthorne Hotel) Name of Record Owner: H&C Service Corp. DBA Hawthorne Hotel DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Awnings to be installed over every window along Essex`St, Hawthorne Blvd, and 3 windows facing parking lot. Color dark green. For further info. see • application @ Salem Planning Dept, 1 Salem Green, Salem, MA. . will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By-('A n /)A A l._ a A n w A Chairman A Salem Historical Commission CITY HALL. SALEM. MASS. 01970 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction ( ) ; demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration ( ) ; painting ( ) ; sign or other appurtenant fixture ( x) work as described below in the . . . J Iq Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTR CT) Address of Property: iR� 1 ,,r Name of Record Owner: H & C Service Corp. (Hawthorne Hotel) - DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: ,Approve application as submitted for canvas awning above entrance of Tavern on the Green. Same color as existing awnings on street level. Entrance is located to the left of the main door. Letter on all three sides to say "Tavern on the Green" in white letters. will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: 9/21/89 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By Chairman yN�o� cc: City Clerk Building Inspector J Salem Historical commission ._ CITY HALL. SALEM. MASS. 01570 - 744-4580 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction ( ) ; • demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration ( ); painting (X) ; sign or other appurtenant fixture ( ) work as described below in the . . . Historic District (NAME OF H STORI DISTRICT) Address of Property: �18 Washington Square West Name of Record Owner: Three Corners Realty Trust DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Remove all lose and peeling paint, caulk all openings around windows, doors and trim. Reglaze sash where necessary, prime and paint all wooden surfaces with a custom beige paint as presented October 1, 1986. Paint all cement masonry with paint color as presented October 1 , 1986. Paint fire escapes with black enamel and restain fences to match existing color as per application presented October 1, 1986. This certificate is issuedbecause the work is historically and architecturally appropriat to the above listed building and district in general. will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per 'the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: Y 1996 - SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By &Akk Chairman of *Nlelll, '7fflassac4usletts Vublic Vrupert� Pepttrtlneut s ''""a�M�e�t�z� �uillntq �epttrtntent CDnr �nlrm (hirers 713-0213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. April 9, 1987 Mr. Jay Reis, Project Manager Goudreau Construction Co. , Inc. 203 Willow Street South Hamilton, MA 01982 le'RE: Hawthorne Hotel t Dear Mr. Reis, On April 8, 1987 a routine inspection was made at the Hawthorne Hotel with the following findings. 1 . The Essex Room partition's do not extend full height to the floor/roof above. This enclosure must have a one hour Fire Rating. In view of the joti conditions this may be accomplished by erecting a stud partition over the existing plaster wall and covering with two (2) layers of type X (Fire Code) sheet-rock, staggered, and made tight. 2. Two (2) area' s of pipe chases within the Essex Room must be Fire Stopped at floor level. 3. A section of the first floor function room, lobby end does not extend full height and must be treated as in item $ 1 above. These area's will require a re-inspection prior to replacement of the ceiling's in these area's. Sincerely, William H Munroe Inspector of Buildings WHM/eaf C.C. Mr. Kenneth Bavard A.I.A Project Manager - DiLeonardo International Inc. 2346 Post Road Warwick, R.I. 02886-2242 I fi . I IL IE ® N Al R D MEETING MEMORANDUM _ TO: Files `p FROM: Ken Bavaro : ' w zs _a DATE: March 10 , 1987 0; RE : Hawthorne Hotel Salem, Massachusetts A meeting was held at the building inspector' s office on March 9 , 1987 with the following in attendance : William Munroe Building Inspector - City of Salem Michael Harrington Three Corners Realty Trust Jay Reis Gourdeau Construction Company Ken Bavaro biLeonardo International , Inc . The following was discussed: 1 . Mr. Munroe will accept wire glass in french door wall in lieu of plate glass and a water curtain in the ceiling that separates the restaurant and lobby. Mr. Harrington will discuss this with his associates and decide whether to provide the wire glass and water curtain or leave the existing wall in place . He will forward his decision to DiLeonardo International by March 10 , 1987 . 2 . Mr. Munroe will accept 1 3/4" solid core wood doors in lieu of steel doors in any two-hour partitions . Steel frames will be used. 3 . Mr. Munroe suggested that ballroom doors to lobby be swing type . He will accept in-swinging without panic devices because of the location near second floor stairway. DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL&RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Post Road.Wary ick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW USA HAWTHORNE HOTEL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 10 , 1987 PG. 2 OF 2 If your understanding on any of these items is different than that stated, please contact this office immediately so that we can resolve our misunderstandings . Sincerely, 5ILEONARDO INTERNATIONAL , INC . eth Bava o Project Architect/Manager KB/jmh cc : All attendees Ken Boyles Bill Gray Mike Tickner Nancy Spirito Bob DiLeonardo DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL&RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Port Road,Warwick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW USA Pl ¢617 HAWTHORNE HOTEL CODE COMPLIANCE MEETINGrtIFr, CITE 1:.SAJLC,.', A51 DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1987 ATTENDEES: BALL MONROE - SALEM BUILDING INSPECTION G ourdeau LZURICE MARTINEAU - SALEM BUILDING INSPECTION ConStTuction KEN BAVARRO - DILEONARDO INTERNATIONAL DAVE BOURQUE - GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION Company, Inc. JAY REIS - GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE FOLLOWING ARE COMMENTS AND REQUESTS PER THE SALEM BUILDING INSPECTOR: 1. A TWO (2) HOUR RATING IS REQ'D. ON ALL NEW WALLS CONSTRUCTED OR AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL RATED WALLS ARE TO BE CONTINUED THROUGH THE EXISTING PLASTER CEILINGS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE DECK. 3. ALL STEEL COLUMNS & BEAMS TO HAVE TWO (2) LAYERS OF 5/8" FIRE CODE DRYWALL. 4. IF POSSIBLE, TRY TO REMOVE POCKET DOORS AT BALLROOM & HINGE THEM TO SWING OUT. 5. ALL VISIBLE VOIDS AND HOLES THROUGH MASONRY AND CONCRETE AT WALLS AND CEILINGS TO BE FILLED AND PATCHED. 6. A TWO (2) HOUR SEPARATION IS TO BE PROVIDED AT DINING ROOM AND LOBBY/ VESTIBULE WALLS. 7. EXTERIOR WALLS ARE OK AS IS - REQUIRE ONE (1) LAYER OF SHEETROCK. EXTERIOR WOOD WINDOWS ARE OK AS IS. 8. WOOD BEAMS AT DINING ROOM "A" AND "B" WILL BE ACCEPTED AS IS, AS LONG AS REMAINS OF OLD PLASTER CEILINGS ARE REMOVED AND CEILING VOIDS PATCHED. 9. A TWO (2) HOUR SEPERATION IS TO BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE KITCHEN. 10. NO UPGRADES IN THE BASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE WORK IS BEING DELETED. 11. UPDATED PLANS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPROPRIATE STAMP, AND REFLECT REQUIRED WALL, DOOR, FRAME, HARDWARE AND MISC. FIREPROOFING. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMS CONTRADICT OUR DISCUSSIONS, WOULD YOU PLEASE RESPOND WITH THE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIONS. ------------------------------------ - DITRIBUTION: ALL ATTENDEES MIKE HARRINGTON - THREE CORNERS REALTY JAKE SEGAL - THREE CORNERS REALTY DAVE TONNESSON - THREE CORNERS REALTY_ KEN BOYLES - HAWTHORNE HOTEL Founded in 1927 203 Willow Street South Hamilton, MA 01982 (617) 468-3511 I L E 0 N AIsi; W i�� It MEETING MEMORANDUM CITY 3°=C. 3m'a=0 F S4`1- r{,HASS. TO: FILES FROM : KEN BAVARO DATE : FEBRUARY 23 , 1987 RE : HAWTHORNE HOTEL - SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS A meeting was held at the Hawthorne Hotel on Friday, February 20 , 1987 with the following in attendance : Bill Munroe Bldg . Inspector - City of Salem Maurice Martineau Asst . Bldg . Inspector - City of Salem Jay Reis Gourdeau Construction Company David Bourque Gourdeau Construction Company Ken Bavaro DiLeonardo International , Inc . The purpose of the meeting was to walk through the building with the building inspector offering his comments and what he will be looking for on the plans . .The following was noted: A. DINING ROOM 1 . Dining Room B (one-story portion) may remain as designed. Provide 5/8" firecode gypsum board ceiling within existing wood boxed beams . 2 . Dining Room A (under meeting rooms) may remain with the following exceptions . a . Remove existing plastered ceiling in its entirety. b . Patch any holes and fill any pipe chases with concrete to produce a monolithic floor/ceiling construction without any penetrations . C . Restaurant wall to vestibule/corridor to be 2-hour construction. DiLeonardo to investigate if a water deluge system can produce a 2-hour wall , if not , the existing wall must remain. May add small windows approx . 10" x 10" with 1/4" wire glass in metal frames . DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL& RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Post Road,Warwick.Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/7325315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW U.S.A HAWTHORNE MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23 , 1987 PG . 2 OF 3 d. Approx. 4 steel beams exposed in the ceiling shall be protected with gypsum board to maintain a 2-hour fire rating. B. LOBBY: 1 . The wall that separates the Lobby and Kitchen shall be constructed to maintain a 2-hour rating. The building inspector will accept 2 layers of 5/8" firecode gypsum board on lobby side to underside of floor deck. Also , exposed steel columns and ceiling beams to be protected with gypsum board to maintain a 2 -hour fire rating. 2 . All new walls constructed shall have a 2 -hour rating . this is because of the mixed use of hotel residential above and hotel assembly below and the absence of a sprinkler system. All doors in a 2-hour wall construction shall maintain the required rating associated with the wall . All walls to extend to underside of floor .deck. DiLeonardo to check into the code on this matter. 3 . Building Inspector requested , but not mendated, that the ballroom sliding doors be changed to swing type . DiLeonardo to consult with Mike Harrington . C . PICKMAN ROOM: 1 . Building Inspector would like to review this area when ceiling and wall paneling is removed. At that time , he will make recommendations on replacement of materials . D . When Gourdeau Construction receives revised stamped plans , they shall contact fire protection and make necessary arrangements with them for their review. E. Building Inspector requires bi-weekly reports stamped from a registered architect . D-1 _LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, I N C. . K .. _.�, r.... e t; „. _ _ HOTEL& RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Post Road,Wawick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW USA HAWTHORNE MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 23 , 1987 PG. 3 OF 3 If your understanding on any of these items are different than that stated, please contact this office immediately so that we can resolve our misunderstandings . Sincerely, DILEONAR 0 INTERNATIONAL , INC. ?2 �IM/VW Wenneth Bavaro , A. I .A. Project Architect/Manager KB/jmh cc : All attendees Mike Harrington Ken Boyles Bill Gray Mike Tickner Bob DiLeonardo DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. .,HOTEL&RESTAURANT-DESIGN- 2346 Post Road.Wmwak Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW U.S.A Ra 21 3 PH 107 CITY 0 F Sf LS:3,' ;,SS. February 25 , 1987 Mr. William Munroe City of Salem Public Property Department Salem, MA 01970 Re : Hawthorne Hotel Salem, MA Dear Mr. Munroe : Pursuant to our last two meetings , this office has reviewed your recommendations for general construction and code compliance revisions to the Hawthorne Hotel project . We agree with and will be directing the contractor to make the following changes : 1 . Delete any work associated with the interior design proposal for the basement level , including the proposed new monumental stair to the basement . 2 . Existing lobby stair to basement shall remain. Existing walls will be repainted and stair treads carpeted with carpet possessing flame-spread ratings required by code . 3 . Another watercloset will be added to the new first floor men' s room. 4 . A two-hour fire wall separation of retail space from adjoining spaces will be provided. Fire wall will extend to underside of second floor deck. 5 . Loose plaster ceiling in restaurant will be removed in its entirety and existing concrete floor/ceiling penetrations exposed during demolition will be patched to produce a fire-stopped monolithic floor/ceiling construction . 6 . Exposed steel beams and columns uncovered by demolition shall be protected with two-hour fire-rated enclosures of firecode gypsum board. 7 . New ceiling in restaurant will be suspended single-layer 5/8" firecode gypsum board between existing wood beams . DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL&RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Post Road,Warwick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW U.S.A. CU Mr. Munroe February 25 , 1987 Pg. 2 of 3 8 . Two layers of 5/8" firecode gypsum board will be provided on lobby side of kitchen wall and will be extended to underside of second floor deck. 9 . Office space will be separated by one-hour wall construction from the lobby. In addition to items 1 through 9 , you have requested because of mixed-use occupancy , any new partitions to be two-hour rated. This also requires provision of B-label steel doors and frames in rated partitions . Our code review has uncovered no requirement to make every new partition a rated partition. We are providing two-hour fire separation between first floor A3 Assembly use group spaces , and Business (retail) use spaces as the code requires (Table 902) . In addition, we are making provision to improve the existing vertical fire separation between the first and second floor Assembly use spaces and the R-1 Residential (hotel) use group spaces when we uncover non-complying conditions during construction. It is our contention that remaining new wall construction on the first floor level does not have to be rated for the following reasons : 1 . All remaining first floor space isolated by one or two-hour construction is classified as A-3 Assembly in accordance with Article 203 . 4 . 2 . The R-1 , hotel guest room spaces and second floor assembly spaces have separate and independent egress via two stair towers and/or a fire escape which do not require exit through any first floor assembly space . 3 . On the first floor, length of exitway access travel to an exitway is well within the 150 feet allowed by Table 607 . Therefore , rated exitway access corridors , or grade passageways and lobbies are not required. In addition, provision of two-hour assemblies on all new walls would seriously limit our ability to maintain and improve the aesthetics of the property . Our clients are committing substantial time and money to the project in an attempt to significantly improve and upgrade the image of the hotel in the community, and to improve their bottom line . It is important for the owners to have the flexibility in design we are supporting by this letter. DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC. HOTEL&RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Port Road,Warwick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW U.S.A Mr. Munroe February 25 , 1987 Pg. 3 of 3 We will contact you shortly to review your position on these issues in hopes that we have supported a reasonable position with respect to code issues . Very truly yours , DILEONA 0 INTERNATIONAL , INC. nneth avar0 ,�1A. Project Architect/Manager KB/jmh cc : Mike Harrington Jay Reis Bill Gray DI LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL, INC HOTEL&RESTAURANT DESIGN 2346 Port Road.Warwick Rhode Island 02886-2242 401/732-2900 800/556-7408 FAX 401/732-5315 TELEX 6972099 DLTX UW U.S.A HAWTHORNE HOTEL "c F,, CODE COMPLIANCE MEETING C1iY 0"r DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1987 ATTENDEES: MILL MONROE - SALEM BUILDING INSPECTION G o urdeau MAURICE MARTINEAU - SALEM BUILDING INSPECTION Construction KEN BAVARRO - DILEONARDO INTERNATIONAL DAVE BOURQUE - GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION Company, Inc. JAY REIS - GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ---------------------------------------------------------------_---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE FOLLOWING ARE COMMENTS AND REQUESTS PER THE SALEM BUILDING INSPECTOR: 1. A TWO (2) HOUR RATING IS REQ'D. ON ALL NEW WALLS CONSTRUCTED OR AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL RATED WALLS ARE TO BE CONTINUED THROUGH THE EXISTING PLASTER CEILINGS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE DECK. 3. ALL STEEL COLUMNS & BE41S TO HAVE TWO (2) LAYERS OF 5/8" FIRE CODE DRYWALL. 4. IF POSSIBLE, TRY TO REMOVE POCKET DOORS AT BALLROOM & HINGE THEM TO SWING OUT. 5. ALL VISIBLE VOIDS AND HOLES THROUGH MASONRY AND CONCRETE AT WALLS AND CEILINGS TO BE FILLED AND PATCHED. 6. A TWO (2) HOUR SEPARATION IS TO BE PROVIDED AT DINING ROOM AND LOBBY/ VESTIBULE WALLS. 7. - EXTERIOR WALLS ARE OK AS IS - REQUIRE ONE (1) LAYER OF SHEETROCK. EXTERIOR WOOD WINDOWS ARE OK AS IS. 8. WOOD BEAMS AT DINING ROOM "A" AND "B" WILL BE ACCEPTED AS IS, AS LONG AS REMAINS OF OLD PLASTER CEILINGS ARE REMOVED AND CEILING VOIDS PATCHED. 9. A TWO (2) HOUR SEPARATION IS TO BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE KITCHEN. 10. NO UPGRADES IN THE BASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE WORK IS BEING DELETED. 11. UPDATED PLANS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPROPRIATE STAMP, AND REFLECT REQUIRED WALL, DOOR, FRAME, HARDWARE AND MISC. FIREPROOFING. SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMS CONTRADICT OUR DISCUSSIONS, WOULD YOU PLEASE RESPOND WITH THE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIONS. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DITRIBUTION: ALL ATTENDEES MIKE HARRINGTON - THREE CORNERS REALTY JAKE SEGAL - THREE CORNERS REALTY DAVE TONNESSON - THREE CORNERS REALTY �;� KEN BOYLES - HAWTHORNE HOTEL Founded in 1927 203 Willow Street South Hamilton, MA 01982 (617) 468-3511 Gourdeau Construction Company, Inc. lJay Reis Project Manager i I Founded in 1927 203 Willow Street South Hamilton, MA 01982 E (617) 468-3511 DATE L+ r l�'v r1 `,' noyluuam Sly UMHOWE` TEL GCC JOB RE: TO:-,' m twio . 44P Gourdeau Construction HW �u\ �/['� (� Company, Inc. ATTN V14p^DP We are sending you erewith 1. FOR APPROVAL 6.APPROVED // ❑ under separate cover 2. FOR FINAL APPROVAL 7. APPROVED AS NOTED 3. FOR QUOTATION BY 8. REVISE& RESUBMIT 4. FOR YOUR USE 9. DISAPPROVED 5. No.Copies Sheet No. Date Description Action © f �iqveko c- , r , S 2 5 , D D-1Sfbbr D DZF GENERAL EMARKS: � \)j 1� '- /�� SalsH llLjes 4 S Founded in 1927 203 Willow Street By C South Hamilton,MA 01982 (617)468.3511 x HARBINGER ti. o/ v �g" •Y` The Harbinger Co.,Inc Y. - - Post Office Box 1209 - a! :;'� � Calhoun,Georgia 30701 404/625-0918 8001533-0918(GA) 800/241.4216 February 11, 1987 T 441 A p i , d DI 'LEONARDO INTERNATIONAL `* °�. ;: . ` t °2346 Post Road Warwick, .:Rhode :Island .028863 ",Attention: Robin Dear Robin, r` As .requested, enclosed please find the ASTM E7648 Radiant ,w K Panel Flammability Test results on our product 'LOREN If I can be of :further assistance, please call. Sincerely THE,:HARBINGER COMPANY } Lyn C. Duncan v l...n r .Enc. 1 C E RTI T I E D ✓"4;T LABORATORIES, Inc. PHONE 1404) 226-1400• 1105 RIVERBEND DRIVE • P O BOX 2041 • DAL.ION. GEORGIA 70720 RP20tr OF r&ST AJA 3E:, 32237 October 24, 19,14 CLL:^7T: HariAn_er Company, Inc. Lail. 'rest io. 193703161•) P.O. fiox 1209 Callioun, GA 30701 SUBJECT: One (1) sample of carpet submitted and identified by client as "DATAWEAVE II". RADIANT PANEL FLA4,11ABbLITY TEST Specimens of the sample were tested for critical radiant flux in accordance with A37M Test Method E-543, NFPA 253 and M4 Standard 372 . The value reported is the average of three specimens. Test Assembly: Specimens were mounted . on cement asbestos board using Taylor No. 295 adhesive. TEST RESULTS Detailed Data Are Attached 'iereto Average Standard Coefficient 1p` Critical Radiant Flux Deviation of Variation 0.76 watts/sq. cm. +0.21 23.02 The sample tested meets or exceeds t:Te reouirefaents for '.IFPA Class I. For 1;) OURLETTERS AND REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE IESTEO /.1 ARE NOI M1I CCSSAPILv NIIICAiIVC OE TN[ V.l ll•\t n IOf NTIC AL OR SIMILAR PMODVCTS. THESE LETTERS AND DEPORTS • IOM 1-1 VSI ONLY OI TNi CLIENT TO -"0- TMf. O . . . ANO THEIR COHMVNICATION TO ANY OTHERS OR THE USE Or T.F•..ME OE CERTIFIED TESTING LABOR4T0PIE5. Ir.: _a. 1, I .I 10A PAIOR YYRrtTrN APPMovAL r.F REPORTS AND LETIEPS. AND c + 1AH1 01 OUR SIAL'. OR OUR wsICNIA u1 NOT Vh. I. I— .' .. 1 E C E RTI F I E D Z4;zi�? LABORATORIES, Inc. n PHONE (404) 226 1400 • 1105 RIVERSEND DRIVE • P. O, BOX 2041 DALTON. GEORGIA 30720 ATTACHMENT TO REPORT NUMBER 32237 Critical Time Distance Radiant Flux Specimen 1 56.4 minutes 34.4 centimeters 0.61 watts/sq. cm. Specimen 2 24.7 minutes 13.7 centi:ueters 1.00 watts/sq. on. Specimen 3 42.2 minutes 31.9 centimeters 0.66 watts/sq. cm. AVERAGE: 0.76 watts/sq. cm. Standard Deviation: + 0.21 Coefficient of Variation: 23,0% OUP • LETTERS AND REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE $AMPLE TESTED NO ARE NOT NECESSARIII INDICA1111 OC 111E CU.L-111H O, APCNTIY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRO"UCTS THESE LETTERS AND REPORTS ARE COP THE USE ONLY 0E THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ANE ADOP E$SC" N AND THEIR COMMUNICATION TO ANY OTHERS OR THE U 5 OF THE NAME OF CERTIFIED TESTING LASOPATORICS IN' UST PCC[IVC n.., Heine W-1—N APP— Al T PEPOPTS AND LCTT[PS AND OUP NAME, OP OUP SEALS OR CUP INSIGNIA ARE NOT UNDEP All CIRCUM. 502 qww- GENERAL FELT INDUSTRIES PARK 80 PLAZA WEST-ONE.SADDLE BROOK,NEW JERSEY 07662 TELEPHONE(201)Bd3-0900 111-5 June 30, 1986 FELT CARPET CUSHION TUNNEL TEST RESULTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We certify that the following grades of Felt have been tested by an independent laboratory and that these tests were conducted in accordance with the provisions of ASTM-E-84-80 Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials" . FLAME SPREAD SMOKE FUEL GRADE RATE DENSITY CONTRIBUTION 32 oz . Diplomat 50 35 20 40 oz . Winston/ .„Blue step/Dip lomat 55 35 20 50 oz . Winston/Bluestep/ Diplomat 60 60 30 56 oz . Rubberstep/Winston/ Bluestep 75 155 35 56 oz . Royal Step 60 50 25 These products have been tested in accordance with DOC-FF-1-701 (Pill Test) and have passed this test. Sincerely, GENERAL JELT INDUSTRIES Te J . Kall Vice President , Sales TJK/jc 01 GENERAL FELL IND S PAL,80 PLA/A WE�1 ONE.SADDLE BROOK.NEW JERSEY 07662 TELEPHONE(2C 0900 FELT CUSHION SPECIFICATIONS DIPLOMAT BLUE-STEP RUBBER-STEP OUNCE WEIGHT: 32,. 40, 50 32, 40, 50, 56 56 ROLL SIZE: 6 x 60, 12 x 60 6 x 60, 12 x 60 6 x 60, 12 x 60 COLOR : Brown Blue Apricot TRAFFTC RECOMMENDATION : Normal 32 oz. 32 oz. Moderate 40 oz. 40 oz. Heavy 50 oz. 50 oz. Extra Heavy 56 oz. 56 oz. FLAMMABILITY: (ASTM E-84) Class B Class B Class B 40 oz. 50 oz. 40 oz. 50 oz. 56 oz. 56 oz. Flame Spread 55 60 55 60 75 75 Fuel Contribution 20 30 20 30 35 35 Smoke Density 35 60 35 60 155 155 DESCRIPTION: Rubber-Step, Blue-Step and Diplomat are Rubberized Waffle (Felt) H H cushions, needleloomed from India Fiber (jute) through a synthetic H scrim interliner for dimensional stability. These felt products are w rubber coated on both sides with a distinctive waffle design embossed on the top surface and a non-skid design on the back. This rubber- ized process improved the cushioning and permits ease of installation above and on grade. All products are FHA approved with the exception of the 32 oz, weight. x SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE POST OFFICE DR AVJER 28510 6220CULEBRA ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 28284 15121684 5111 1" OE P AR T M E N T OF TELEX:767357 FIRE TECHNOLOGY TWX:910871-'' 34 December 5, 1984 1 ,y Criterion Mills, Incorporated Route 2, Highway 41 South Cartersville, Georgia 30120 Attn: Ms. Sue S4r&% r 15AM Re: SwRI Project No. 01-8302-046-b FINAL REPORT "Test for Critical Radiant Flux (CRF) of Flooring and Floor- covering Mate ials ASTM E648, )" Gentlemen: �� y� This letter constitutes our final report on your tufted, polypropylene carpet submitted for evaluation by the referenced test method. The results presented apply to the material tested which the Sponsor claims to be a representative sample of the material described in this report. The possibility of product variability has not been assessed. TEST OBJECTIVE AND PROCEDURE The procedures followed in this test are those defined by the National Bureau of Standards for the Determination of Critical Radiant Flux (CRF) by means of the Flooring Radiant Panel (FRP) Method. This method measures the critical radiant flux at flame-out. Suggested levels of performance are 0.45 watts per square centimeter for corridors in health care centers and 0.22 watts per square centimeter in other facilities. This test incorporates a horizontal 10 x 41-1/2-in. (25.4 x 105.4-cm) flooring sample positioned in a frame assembly and exposed to an inclined (300) 13 x 19-in. (0.33 x 0.48-m) radiant panel. The radiant panel is allowed to heat up for 60 minutes at normal gas-air settings prior to conducting tests on candidate floorings. A preheat period of 2 minutes is made, after which a propane pilot flame is lowered, impinging onto the specimen near the closest radiant panel position. A heat flux of more than 1.0 W/cm2 is generated at the specimen surface nearest the radiant panel and less than 0.2 W/cm2 is generated at the specimen surface furth- 4 est from the gas-air fired radiant panel. An average of three runs are made and critical heat flux values are calculated using a predetermined -; heat flux curve. Observations such as ignition, distortion and surface behavior are made during each test. _.j TM1is rtJon is for IM1e info,nooxm of the S,n or.Irma,,be used in os mJrel,for 1M1e purpose of reeurina proEun arcepunce from Oul,eomlirm ed apprmalamboiilies,bores a.this Fronts onM1e name of the Institute shall not h me0 in publicir,or aCralisiny. I SAN ANTONIO TEXAS }e l ^ WITN OilrCES IN NODSTDN. TFaaS. .40DWASHINGTON. D.C. ,X Criterion Mills Incorporated SWRl Project No. 01 -8302-046-b ASTM 6648-78 Test Method December 5, 1984 Page 2 DESCRIPTION AND PREPARATION OF MATERIAL Date Received: October 17, 1984 - Type: Carpet n Trade Name: Hidden Valley Ole Color: Blue/Grey Construction: Tufted, multi-level, loop pile Pile Fiber: Polypropylene Pile Height: 0.22 in. (5.6 mm) Loop Count: Per Lineal In. = 7.9 x 8.4 Per In.2 = 66.36 (10.29 tufts/cm2) Backing(s): Synthetic Thickness: 0.38 in. (9.5 mm) Unit Weight: 82.19 oz/yd2 (2.79 kg/m2) - Total Weight: 25.8 lb (11.7 kg) No./Size Received: 1 piece, 46 x 141.5 in. (1.17 x 3.59 m) Underlayment: Direct glue down Substrate Used: 1/4-in. (6.35-mm) glass-reinforced-cement board on 1/2-in. (12.7-mm) inorganic millboard Adhesive Used: Macco 711 Date of Test: LrActober 29, 1984 Cure Time akli_ ` 10 days, 70OF and 50*k Relative Humidity TEST RESULTS t Number of Runs: 3 Maximum-Flame Propagation Distance: 58.2 cm Time to..Flame Front Extinguishment: 151.1 minutes Critical Radiant Flux (CRF): 0.26 +— .0.04 W/cm2 Standard Deviation (S): #0.04 ,gam Sincerely,cl.-a Carl A. Hafer, P.E. Manager Standard Testing Services CAH/jef TNi r.pDrl is for the info?mntlon of the S;omo,.h n.y!N...d u,ul enii¢OFor in::.m;mr of•ecunne Drodun•...yu duty eom,iwled aPD?ol Iautho"dies;ho�e•a,this Dun or the nam oI IAr lnsum e,hall no?M used inP Dhcip o?.d,nl nin{. w .... SAN ANTONIO TEXAS 1 T N O I i I C C 5 1 N N 0 V 5 T O N i(}A 5. •N O WASHINGTON. DC . W . United States Testing Company, Inc. California Division _ 6b66 TELEGRAPH ROAD,LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 50010 • TELEPHONE: LOS ANGELES-213/723.7151 EST. IED - FROM SAN FRANCISCO-4151925L566 REPORT OF TEST MONTEREY CARPETSPINC. 1100 John Reed Court City of Industry, CA 91745 it . .... QUALITY: Product I`- June 14, 1983 TEST REPORT NO. LA 30932-1 SIGNED f R THE COMPANYIL BY Patrick V. MCCullen Test Technician: T.Naughton Manager of Fire Technology Page__1_ of .4. Laboratories eb New York • . Chicago . Los Angeles Tulsa Memphis Reading Richland THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES IDENTIFIED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S)TESTED.THEYEST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OR REPRESENTATIVE OF TN[ QUALITIES OF THE LOT FROM WHICH THE SAMPLE WAS TAKEN OR OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL ON SIMILAR PRODUCTS. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS NEPORT SMALL MEAN THAT UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY. INC.. CONDUCTS ANY QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE CLIENT TO WHOM THIS TEST RE- PORT IS ISSUED, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SPECIFIED. OUR REPORTS AND LETTERS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED. AND THEY AND THE NAM[OF THE UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY. INC. OR ITS SEALS ON INSIGNIA. ARE NOT TO BE USED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IN AOVER- TISING TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND MAY NOT BE USED IM ANY OTHER MANNER WITHOUT OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. SAMPLES NOT DESTROYED IN TESTING AIME BETAINED A MAXIMUM OF SHIRTY DAYS. UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. • •, LA 30932-1 REFERENCE Client's Purchase Order No. 3959 per Mr. John D. Bippart. TEST REQUEST AND METHOD The submitted carpet sample was assembled and tested for flammability in accordance with the procedures outlined in ASTM Designation E-648 , "Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source" . SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION The sample was submitted and identified by the Client as: Carpet Quality: Product #926 Briarwood Construction: Level Loop Thickness: 0. 350" Pg. 2 UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. LA 30932-1 PREPARATION AND CONDITIONING The carpet sample was cut into three sections 10" wide by 42" long and backed with 1/4" asbestos-cement board per para. 6.2 of the standard prior to being firmly secured in the specimen tray. ' The sample panels were conditioned at 73.4 + 5° F and 50 + 5% relative humidity and allowed to come to equilibrium. Note: Per the Client's request, the carpet specimens were adhered- directly to-the A/C board substrates . The sample was described as material intended for direct glue-down application. TEST PROCEDURE a ( The test chamber was pre-heated for one hour and the radiant panel black body temperature verified to be within 5°C of the temperature established during calibration. The pilot burner was ignited and the specimen inserted into the chamber. After a two-minute pre-heat, .the pilot burner flame was placed in contact with the specimen for ten minutes, then removed. The test was continued until all flaming ceased. The distance burned was measured and converted to Critical Radiant Heat Flux at flame out. Pg. 3 Q. ! U141 I LU a 1 A i L-5 1 t51 IWU UUMPANY, INU. L LA 30932-1 Quality: Product #926 - Briarwood TEST RESULTS Test Specimen ' Burn Distance Critical Radiant Heat ; No. cm. Flux, watts/sq.cm. i 1 2 .0 Greater than 1. 01 2 2 .0 Greater than 1.01. 3 2 .0 Greater than 1.01 Average T Greater than 1.01, "OBSERVATIONS I The test specimens ignite briefly when. impinged by the test flame , but, extirrguish during the ten minute test, period. i REQUIREMENTS + The 1981. Edition .of the NFPA "Life Safety Code" provides the following classifications for regulating interior flooring materials in specified occupancies: Class 'I - Includes materials which have a minimum Critical Radiant Flux of 0 .45 watts/sg.cm. -`I Class Ii•' -Includes materials which have a minimum t"= Critical Radiant Flux of 0 . 22 watts/sq.cm. Examples of the requirements for application of interior flooring materials in exits and corridors for specified occupancies-are listed below-. . -Health Care Centers - Class I in new facilities and . for newly installed flooring materials in existing facilities. Child Care Centers Class I or II in both new and existing facilities . Hotels and Dormitories - Class I or II in both new and existing facilities. Apartments - Class I or II in both ' new and existing facilities. Detention and Correctional Centers - Class I in new facilities and in areas not separated from exits . and corridors by a smoke barrier. Class I.I in existing facilitaes. with exceptions for materials which bave- been evaluated by the ASTM E-84 Tunnel Test Method. ' Pg 4 . j United States Testing Company, Inc. California Division 5555 TELEGRAPH ROAD,LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90040 . TELEPHONES: LOS ANGELES-213/723.7161 IL 722-0505 EST. TWO FROM SAN FRANCISCO-415/928-5855 REPORT OF TEST Monterey Carpets Inc . 441 North Baldwin Park Blvd. Industry, Ca. 91746 •,r M: "ACAS I .. I0 • 0 kM1 May 21,1984 TEST REPORT NO. LA 40785-1 SIGN gNGeorgi E. McCullen� f6Yatric c u Test Engineer Manager/Fire Technology Pg. 1 of 5 lr boratories in: New York Chicago Los Angeles • Houston Tulsa Memphis • Reading Richland RTHIS REPOT APPI EPRESENTAATIVE OF STHE LQUAL QUALITIES OFNTHE LOT RFROM C WHICH S THE SAMPLE E WASED AND TTAKEN OR OF AO THE IPPIARENTTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. INDICATIVEED.THETEST RESULTS ARE H07 NECESARILY NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT SMALL MEAN THAT UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY. INC.. CONDUCTS ANY QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE CLIENT TO WHOM THIS TEST RE- PORT IS ISSUED. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SPECIFIED. OUR REPORTS AND LETTERS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED. E AND THEY AND THE NAM(OF THE UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY. INC. OR ITS SEALS OR INSIGNIA. ARE NOT TO BE USED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IN ADVER- TISING TO TE GENERAL PUBLIC AND MAY NOT BE USED IN ANY OTHER MANNER WITHOUT OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. SAMPLES NOT DESTROYED IN TESTING M ARE RETAINED A MAXIMUM OF THIRTY DAYS. / UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. LA -40785-1 REFERENCE Client 's Purchase Order No. 6706 dated May 3, 1984. Our Confirmation to the Client dated May 7 , 1984 . REQUIREMENT Perform standard flame spread, smoke density and fuel contributed classification tests on the carpet supplied by the client in accordance with ASTM Designation E-84 , t; "Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Character- <' istics of Building Materials". SAMPLE TDENTIFICATION The sample tested was submitted and identified by the Client as : Carpet Quality "Briarwood" consisting of: Pile Yarn- Antron III Filament Pile Yarn Weight - 26 oz ./yd. 2 Total Weight- 3 . 8 lb/yd. 2 Total Thickness - 0.350" 2 . UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. LA - 40785-1 PREPARATION AND CONDITIONING The carpet sample was cut into three sections 24 inches wide by 8 feet long and adhered to panels of 1/4 inch asbestos- cement board with Sairmix #7 High Temperature Bonding Mortar. The sample panels were placed in the conditioning room (main- 73.4 + 5°F and 'a ;relative humidity tained at a temperature of of 50 + 5%) and allowed to come to moisture equilibrium. TEST PROCEDURE x . The sample was tested following calibration and preheating. The evaluation was performed in conformance. with the specifi rations set forth in ASTM Designation E-84 , "Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Ma- terials", both as to equipment and test procedure . The fore- going test procedure is comparable to UL 723, NFPA No . 255 and UBC No. '42-1 . 3 UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. LA 40785-1 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Because of the possible variations in reproducibility, the results are adjusted to the nearest figure divisible by S. Sample Flame Fuel Smoke Identification Spread Contribution Density Carpet Quality "Briarwood" 25 25 90 In order to obtain the Flame Spread Classification, the above results' should be compared to the following table: ;NFPA Class UBC Class FLAME SPREAD ,< A I 0 through 25 B 11 26 through 75 C 111 76 through 200 D --- 2.01 through 500 E --- Over 500 BUILDING CODES CITED 1 . National Fire Protection Association, NFPA No . 101 , "Life Safety Code". 2. Uniform Building Code, 1982 edition, Part VIII , "Fire Resistive Standard For Fire Protection" , Chapter 42- Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish, Sections 4201-4203. 4 UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. LA 40785-1 ASTM E-84 TEST DATA SHEET CLIENT: Monterey Carpets Inc': DATE: May 8 , 1984 SAMPLE: Carpet Quality "Briarwood" THICKNESS: Nominal `'0 . 35011 FLAME SPREAD: IGNITION: . 1 minute 30 seconds FLAME FRONT: 11 . 5"LF -`FT. MAX. •TIME TO eMAX. ;SPREAD 9 mins . .20 secs . CALCULATION: 46. 30 x 0.515=23. 84 TEST `'DURATION 10rtminutes . ;. SUMMARY FLAME SPREAD BY: ASTM E-W-81a 25 FUEL CONTRIBUTION: `.. 25 SMOKE DENSITY: 90 w�. OBSERVATIONS >. Following sample ignition the flame front advanced to 11 . 5 feet in a total time of 9 minutes twenty seconds . Flaming drips were noted at 3 minutes 30 seconds followed by slight floor burning at 6 minutes . Copious afterburning was observed at the conclusion of the test . Pg . 5 . ® O COMMERCIAh TESTinn COMPRnY SPECIFIC OPTICAL DENSITY OF SMOKE GENERATED BY SOLID MATERIALS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 662-79 Material Identified as "Rivera" Report Number 53004 Test Number 1738-3987 August 20, 1986 Prepared for: Burlington Industries, Inc. Glasgow, Virginia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY Jonathan Jackson Executive Vice President TESTING RESEARCH • ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215 S. HAMILTON ST. - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 Report Number 53004 Test Number 1738-3987 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION This report represents results of the smoke chamber test on a material submitted for testing by Burlington Industries, Inc. . The test was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Method of Test E 662-79, "Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials." This method, also known as the NBS Smoke Chamber, is identical to the method described in the National Fire Protection Association Number 258-1976. It is used solely to measure the smoke density characteristics of a material under controlled laboratory conditions. It should not be used for the description, appraisal, or regulation of the hazard of a material under actual fire conditions. No consideration is made for results that may be obtained if the material being evaluated were tested in combination with other materials. The test results apply only to the specimens tested and are not necessarily indicative of apparent identical or similar materials. All test data are on file and are available for review by authorized persons. II. SCOPE The smoke density chamber test is used to determine the specific optical density of smoke generated within a closed chamber due to non- flaming pyrolitic decomposition and flaming combustion. The non-flaming mode employs an electrically-heated radiant energy heat source with an irradiance level of 2.5 watts per square centimeter. For the flaming mode, a six-tube burner, fueled with a propane/air mixture, is used in combination with the radiant heat to apply a row of equidistant flamelets across the lower edge of the specimen and into the specimen trough. A photometric system with a vertical light path is used to measure the varying light transmittance as smoke accumulates. The light trans- mission measurements are used to calculate the Specific Optical Density, which is derived from a geometrical factor associated with the dimensions of the test chamber and specimen, and the measured optical density, a measurement characteristic of the concentration of smoke. The photometric scale used to measure the smoke generated in this test is similar to the optical density scale for human vision. III. TEST PROCEDURE Specimens measuring three (3) inches square are taken from the specimen to be evaluated. Specimens are enclosed with heavy-duty alum- inum foil and mounted in troughed specimen holders backed with a § inch Report Number 53004 Test Number 1738-3987 Page 3 of 5 inorganic millboard block. The samples are pre-conditioned for twenty- four (24) hours at 140°F, and then conditioned to equilibrium at 70°F and 50 percent relative humidity. The test method consists of three (3) exposures in the flaming mode and three (3) exposures in the non-flaming mode. However, in many instances, the code requirement will be the same as for the General Services Administration where the flaming mode only is required. For those tests, only the flaming mode is done and reported. The test chamber is pre-conditioned to a ready state and the irrad- iance level of the radiant heat energy source is verified. The 100% and 02 transmittance of the photometric system is calibrated. The specimens mounted in the troughed specimen holders are tested in the appropriate mode for the evaluation being done, whether flaming only or both flaming and non-flaming. The test period is for twenty (20) minutes or until minimum light transmittance is obtained, whichever occurs first. The test chamber is then evacuated of the accumulated smoke. Another light transmittance reading is taken and recorded as the clear beam reading. This is the accumulation of soot and other effluent on the optical system and is converted to specific optical density and used as a correction factor in calculating final test results. The recorded data for light transmittance is. used to calculate the specific optical density of the smoke generated during the test for each of the specimens tested. The results are then averaged and reported as Average Specific Optical Density. IV. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL TESTED The material being evaluated, identified as Rivera, is described in the Table below. CTC Test Number - 1738-3987 Date Tested - . August 20, 1986 Identification - Rivera Construction - :`N/A Yarn Type - N/A Secondary Backing - Polypropylene Division - Lees Pattern Number - L1395 Test Number - SC-436 Face Fiber - Staple Nylon/CF Nylon Face Weight - 40.0 ounces per square yard Primary Backing - Polypropylene Laminate - Latex .4 Report Number 53004 Test Number 1738-3987 Page 4 of 5 V. TEST RESULTS The test results are presented as an average of the specimens test- ed in each exposure mode required for the specific evaluation. The test results are shown in the following table: Flaming Non-Flaming Rivera 187 331 The Tektronix 4051 computer print-out for data obtained during the test is shown on the final page of the report. The following list of abbreviations and their meanings are used in the print-out and may be useful in interpretation of test data. %T is the percent light transmission ranging from 100% to 0% transmittance. Ds is the specific optical density. Dm is the maximum specific optical density. Dc is the specific optical density value of the clear beam reading (correction factor) : Dm (corrected) represents Dm - Dc and is the corrected maximum specific optical density, the number which, when averaged, is the final test .result. Time to Dsm16 is the time at which 75% light transmittance is obtained, which yields a specific optical density of 16. Dm @ 1.5 and 4.0 minutes are shown because some aerospace and aviation agencies require these time criteria in judging the smoke development characteristics of a material. NOTE: Dm @ 4.0 minutes may be higher than Dm (corrected) because no allowance is made for the accumulation of soot on the photometer system. NBS SMOKE DENSITY CHAMBER NFPA 258/ASTM E 662 CLIENT: BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. CTC TEST #: 1738-3987 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION: RIVERA DATE: 8-20-86 CHAMBER OPERATING CONDITIONS: RADIOMETER READING 8.83 RV RADIOMETER IRRADIANCE 2.58 WATTS/SA CM FURNACE VOLTAGE = 95. 8 VOLTS PROPANE Q 50 CC/MIN (FLAMING) s Be AIR @ ,508 CC/MIN <FLAMING) 104 CHAMBER TEMPERATURE 95 + DEG F CHAMBER PRESSURE _ <3.0 INCHES WATER TEST RESULTS: FLAMING HON-FLAMING SPECIMEN # 1 2 3 1 2 3 %T(mdx) 2. 88888 3.38880 2.48808 8.29888 8. 22880 0. 33080 Dm 205 196 214 335 351 328 TIME TO Dm 3. 4 4. 1 3. 7 19. 9 20. 0 19. 8 Dc 18 16 28 7 7 6 Dn (CORRECTED) 187 180 194 328 344 322 TIME TO Ds=16 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 6 2. 7 2. 8 2. 7 SMOKE COLOR GREY GREY GREY GREY GREY GREY Dm AT 1 . 5 MIN 6 5 6 1 8 1 Dm AT 4. 0 MIN 285 192 214 45 51 42 AVERAGE CORRECTED Dm 187 331 I'r , CCU COMMBRCIA16 TESTino compnnY CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS USING A RADIANT HEAT ENERGY SOURCE ASTM Standard Method of Test E 648-84 Floor Covering Identified as "FRP-664, Rivera, L1395" Report Number 52072 Test Number 1736-3914 August 19, 1986 d. Prepared for: Burlington Industries Glasgow, Virginia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY ��Xda^ Jonathan Jackson Executive Vice President TESTING • RESEARCH • ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215 S. HAMILTON ST. - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 Report Number 52072 Test Number 1736-3914 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION This report represents results of a test for critical radiant flux of a floor covering system submitted by Burlington Industries. This test, also known as the Flooring Radiant Panel, is identical to the Federal Test Method Standard Number 372 and the National Fire Protection Association Test Method Number 253. It measures the critical radiant flux at flame-out of horizontally mounted complete flooring systems exposed .to a flaming ignition source in a graded radiant heat energy environment. It is intended to simulate actual conditions that have been observed and defined in full-scale experiments. The test is applicable only to floor covering systems which duplicate or simulate accepted installation practices. Teats on individual components of a system are of limited value and are not valid for evaluation of the entire flooring system. I The test results , apply only to the specimens tested and are not necessarily indicative of -apparent',identical or similar materials. All test data are on :file and available for review by authorized persons. II..-, PURPOSE a,a The Flooring Radiant Panel„ test measures the level of "incident radiant heat energy on the floor covering system at the most distant flame-out point, and is expressed as Critical Radiant Flux in watts per square centimeter. It provides a basis for estimating one aspect of flamespread behavior for floor covering systems installed in corridors or exitways of buildings. The imposed radiant flux simulates thermal radiation levels likely to impinge on the floor of an exitway or a corridor whose upper surfaces are heated by flame and/or hot gases from a fully developed fire in an adjacent room or compartment. III. TEST PROCEDURE A minimum of three (3) sets of the floor covering system must be tested. A specimen measuring 20 centimeters by 100 centimeters is mounted in a horizontal specimen holder in the test chamber. `A gas/air fueled radiant heat energy panel is mounted in the chamber at a 30° angle to the horizontal specimen plane. The radiant panel generates an energy flux distribution ranging along the 100 centimeter length of the test specimen of approximately 1.0 watts per square centimeter to a minimum of 0.1 watts per square centimeter. The test is initiated by an open flame from a pilot burner that is brought into contact with the specimen for 10 minutes. For specimens that continue to burn after the 4 Report Number 52072 Test Number 1736-3914 Page 3 of 5 -pilot burner is removed, the test is continued until all flame is out. The specimen is then removed from the test chamber and the point of farthest flame front advance measured. The critical radiant flux is then computed from the Flux Profile Curve determined during calibration of the test apparatus. IV. FLOORING SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The material being evaluated, identified as FRP-664, Rivera, L1395, is described in the Table below: . Floor Covering: Test Number - 1736-3914 Identification - FRP-664, Rivera, L1395 Construction - N/A Secondary Backing - Polypropylene Color - N/A hk Division - Lees Mode Gluedown Face Fiber = - Staple Nylon/CF Nylon Face Weight - 40.0 ounces per square yard Primary Backing - Polypropylene Laminate - Latex Flooring System: Structural Floor - mineral-fiber/cement board Underlayment - N/A Adhesive - Burlington Hot Melt Conditioning: Duration - 48 hours Temperature - 70 t 5°F Relative Humidity - 50 t 5 percent V. TESTING The critical radiant flux of an inorganic millboard dummy specimen was checked at the 40 cm mark on the day of the test. Critical radiant flux of 0.5 3 0.02 watts per square centimeter as measured at a distance of 40 centimeters from the 0 end of the specimen, indicated proper operation of the test apparatus. The flooring system was then tested within parameters outlined in the standard on August 19, 1986. !t Report Number 52072 Test Number 1736-3914 Page 4 of 5 -VI. TEST RESULTS The test data for the three specimens tested are shown in the chart below and in the Tektronix 4051 computer print-out on Page 5. Material Identification - FRP-664, Rivera, L1395 Test Number - 1736-3914 Date Tested - August 19, 1986 Specimen Number 1 2 3 Distance Maximum Burn (cm) 29.5 33.7 26.5 Time to Flame-out (minutes) 26.8 25.2 31.3 Critical Radiant Flux (W/cm2) 0.70 0.62 0.76 AVERAGE CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX 0.69 W/cm2 "wz ., The Standard Deviation (S ) of the three values of the measured critical radiant flux is 0.642 watts per square centimeter when calculated in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Manual on Quality Control, STP 15c. r _ 4 ASTM E 648 FLOORING RADIANT PANEL CLIENT : BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES TEST NUMBER : 1736-3914 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION : FRP-6649 RIVERA, L1395 FLOORING SYSTEM : BURLINGTON HOT MELT DATE 19 AUG 86 TEST RESULTS: 01 •2 N3 MAXIMUM BURN DISTANCE (CM) : 29. 5 33. 7 26.5 FLAME OUT (MINUTES) : 26. 8 25. 2 31 . 3 CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX: 0. 70 8. 62 0. 76 AVERAGE CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX 8. 69 STANDARD DEVIATION = 0. 0742 1 . 2 R 1 . 1 PANEL TEMPERATURE 500 C A 1 . 0 GAS FLOW 8. 180 NCMH _D 0. 9 AIR FLOW 690 SCFH I 0. 8 PANEL PRESS 0. 25 IN WC N 0. 7 MFG TRANSDUCER MEDTHERM . T 0. 6 MODEL 64-2-20 SERIAL NUMBER 92055 F 0. 5 CAL MEDTHERM 07/85 L 0. 4 COHV. FACTOR 0. 2365 U 8. 3 X 0. 2 0. 1 058 60 70 80 90 108 y DISTANCE (CM) ice`• [ [ ; i; [.J f�- U.1Wcrrocies, Inc. J ,Y tO':I: 1:U.1) : . J • 1105 RIVER�:L N:) i`?..:C • P. O. ©OX 2041 • DALTON, GEORGIA 30720 REPORT OF TEST NUMBER 37109 June 6, 1986 ' CLIENT: Criterion Mills, Inc. Lab. Test No. 7168922005 P.O. Box 1309 Cartersville, GA 30120 SUBJECT: One•z(1) sample of carpet submitted and identified by client as "MONACO, Color 31130 Roll 76333, Action Bac". s _ _:.. RADIANT PANEL FLAMMABILITY TEST Specimens of ._the sample were: tested for critical radiant flux in accordance with ASTM -Test Method E-648.2 A 253 and FTM Standard 372. The value reported is the average of three specimens. Test Assembly_:_._Specimens were mounted -on cement asbestos board using Taylor No. 295 adhesive. TEST RESQLTS... Detailed Data Are Attached Hereto '` Average- Standard Coefficient - Critical Radiant Flux Deviation of Variation 0.48 watts/aq_' cm. 0.02 3.2% ---- The sample-'tested meets or .exceeds the requirements for NFPA Class I. For CERTIFIED TESTING LABORATORIES, Inc. Jol .' Frank, est nt 1p .y G':R LLI!i1 ND I:F.PORTS APPLY C':LY TO,7 ' S<H.PLE TESTED AND APE NOT hF-CEESARILY INOICATIVE OE THE QUALITIES OF Arr"ENTLY E'.TS"L C.'P'"'iLA9 PRODUCTS -�'ESF IE:Tiv1 A!;O REPORT5 APE FOR THE USE ONLY OF THE CLIENT TO %:HO'4 THSY ARE AOCr ES"_D -F 1, cr T„F CAVE OF CERTIFIED TESTV:G LABOFATOBIE5, I!.0 MUST PEcuvE .f �y � 1 LABORATORIES, Inc 11 O JE (401, -:'l 1 1105 RIVERBEND DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 2041 • DALTON. GEORGIA 30720 ATTACHMENT TO REPORT NUMBER 37109 Critical Time Distance Radiant Flux _..Specimen 1 31.7 minutes 40.7 centimeters 0.49 watts/sq. cm. Specimen 2 31.6 minutes 42.6 centimeters 0.46 watts/sq. cm. Specimen 3 43.1 minutes 41.7 centimeters 0.48 watts/sq. cm. t AVERAGE: 0.48 watts/sq. cm. r I Standard Deviation; 0.02 Coefficient'-of Variation: 3.2% s 3 e 1 i i ! i I i ' OUR ......0 I'!D r Cr.rs A(PLY O':LY TO THE 5 '� LC TESTED AND ARE GOT NECLSSAWLY 1!:C ICAtICF Of Tl!C C'JALrt TS CF MAPF FCLY IOCI:TICAL 01i E ♦iL♦R "40DUCIS 71ESE LCTTL'5 AAO PE!'OnTS A4r IOR THE l'SE ONLY O[ TI:C CI-Ir'r:T TO '."C!' TLiEY ♦ _ _'FL�fr. LNO 1,,"R cC 'PV . CAT'OH TO Anv OTHC-S OR 'HE VE[ Cr :r:E r;A r OE CC RTI FI ED T'S F Cl.:i L f CvAT'CCILS 11:C -I:CCI',C t Ft , MOHAWK AFFIDAVIT STATE OR GEORGIA ) ss. : COUNTY OF LAURENS) - RAYMOND N. PALEN, Vice President, Product Develop- ment, Mohasco Carpet Corporation, Dublin, Georgia, first being duly sworn deposes and says: This is to certify that Mohawk's Grade New Directions Code No. 10158 has been tested for flammability using the Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems ASTM E-648 and found to have a radiant flux exceeding .45 watts/cm2 without cushion. This is better than the minimum requirements re- commended by the National Bureau of Standards for exitways and corridors in institutional health occupancies (hospitals, nursing homes) and commercial occupancies (schools, motels, offices, stores, restaurants, etc.) aymond N. Palen Sworn to before me this 14th day of March, 198 , ( NlCamn*"EwknMad 28.1966 MOHAWK AFFIDAVIT STATE OR GEORGIA ) ss. : COUNTY OF LAURENS) RAYMOND N. PALEN, Vice President, Product Develop- ment, Mohasco Carpet Corporation, Dublin, Georgia, first being duly sworn deposes and says: This is to certify that Mohawk's Grade New Directions Code No. 10158 has been tested in accordance with ASTM E 84-84 "Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials", also know as the Steiner Tunnel Test. Test results are as follows: FLAME SPREAD FUELCONTRIBUTIONSMOKE DENSITY 55 30 270 Raymond N. Palen Sworn to before me this 14th day of March, 1916 Now*Pub10-Wori State at Lar6:. Qww*sW E*m Morch 28. 1981 EDiversiTech90 3 General A CENEpRP COMPAN V February 9, 3.987 DeLeonardos 2346 Post Rd. Warwick, RI 02886 Attn: Robin Dear Robin: Per your request, DiversiTech General certifies that its' wall- covering pattern/s listed below exhibit/s the fire ratings as indicated: PATTERN FLAME FUEL SMOKE W585 10 0 0 These numerical ratings were determined by the ASTM E-84 tunnel test method, and are not intended to reflect hazards presented by these or any other products under actual fire conditions. Sincerely, DiversiTech General James R. Colburn Q. A. Manager JRC:cb cc: Jonna-Lappin-Boston Coated Fabrics Division -Columbus Plant P.O. Box 191 Columbus, Mississippi 39703 (601) 327-1522 x EDiversiTech90 3 General Ar.1BC�COMPANY February 9, 1.987 DeLeonardos 2346 Post Rd. Warwick, RI 02886 Attn: Robin Dear Robin: Per your request, DiversiTech General certifies that its' wall- covering pattern/s listed below exhibit/s the fire ratings as indicated: PATTERN FLAME FUEL SMOKE W585 10 0 0 These numerical ratings were determined by the ASTM E-84 tunnel test method, and are not intended to reflect hazards presented by these or any other products under actual fire conditions. Sincerely, DiversiTech General " James R. Colburn Q. A. Manager JRC:cb cc: Jonna-Lappin-Boston Coated Fabrics Division Columbus Plant P.O. Box 191 Columbus, Mississippi 39703 (601) 327.1522 imperial 9 0� guaranteed wallcoverin s® 9 23645 MERCANTILE ROAD,CLEVELAND,OHIO 44122-9990 216.464.3700 February 10, 1987 DiLeonardo Interior 2346 Post Road Warwick, RI 02886 Attention: Robin You may use this letter as authority to state that the product listed in the Collection below meet the provisions of ASTM Designation E-84-70, "Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials". This test method is identical to that specified in ANS No. 2.5, NFPA No. 255, UL No. 723 and UBC No. 42-1 . All of our testing is done by Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284. Flame Fuel Smoke Spread Contributed Density Rate Factor Factor Pattern # PB-1061 5 0 10 Sincerely yours IMPERIAL WALLCOVERINGS Nikki Burgio (/ F9R41 .,.� rs March 30, 1987 G ourdeau Construction Company, Inc. City of Salem Inspector of Buildings One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ATTN: Bill Monroe RE: Hawthorne Hotel Dear Bill , Per our meeting March 27, and discussions relative to the Hawthorne Hotel , 1 would like to confirm the following: As an added measure of safety and protection, Gourdeau Construction will provide a standard type sprinkler system along the glass wall separating the restaurant/lounge from the side lobby/vestibule. The sprinkler will be located on both sides of the wall at 8'-0" centers, and staggered for maximum coverage. All work will be done by persons licensed for this type of work and is to comply with local requirements of governing agencies. We appreciate your effort in resolving this matter. Respectfully, GOURD CONSTRUCTION CO. , INC. Y. ,r4C Jay P. Reis Project Manager JPR:dlc cc: Mike Harrington, Three Corners Realty trust Founded in 1927 203 Willow Street South Hamilton, MA 01982 (617) 468-3511 cc: City Clerk Building Inspector i tj Historical Ccmmissic :kl¢�4, . r T ? CITY HALL, SALEM. MASS. 01970 4-11 FEcEIVEO CITY 0'r S ',LEH, CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction [ ] ; reconstruction [ j; demolition [ ] ; moving [ ] ; alteration [X] ; painting [ ] ; sign or other appurtenant fixture [ ] work as described below in the . . . Washington Square Historic District. (NAVE OF HISTORIC DISTRICT Address of Property: 18 Washington Square West Name of Record Owner: H & C Service Corp. D/B/A Hawthorne Hotel DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Removal and lowering of existing windows of restaurant to original opening and replacement with new colonial insulated panel windows. Intallation of wood panel shutter system in place of windows on Essex St. elevation to left of entry way. Installation of new wooden doors Hawthorne Blvd. and Essex St. elevations. Installation of new windows on front and side of f-ormer>sveet Scoaps_sheg--to'_match:existing front windows. As per application and minutes of meeting, 1/7/87. Not included in this Certificate is any approval of work to the entryway of the former Sweet Scoops shop- (rightmost entryway on Hawthorne Blvd. elevation) or of awnings over windows. will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act (Federal Laws , Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated; January 20, 1987 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By Chairman CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT LJ GERARD KAVANAUGH /' _ , NE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER "- '-� • 61970 1 CI I ", -1EP79�7456�5�0 August 19, 1987 Deborah Ryan Architectural Barriers Board One Ashburton Place, Room 1310 Boston, MA 02108 Dear Ms . Ryan: The City of Salem Building Inspector has requested that I submit correspondence to the Architecture Barriers Board in connection with the handicapped accessibility of the Hawthorne Hotel . The City of Salem Planning Department is in the process of constructing new sidewalks around the Hawthorne Hotel . One improvement included is the provision of handicapped curb—cuts on all corners, as well as handicap accessibility to the Essex Street entrance of the Hotel. In a recent telephone conversation with a member of your staff the grade of the entrance was questioned, such grade will be well within the 1" in 12" requirement . The Essex Street entrance was selected because it is not only a primary entrance to the hotel but it also allows the best direct access to the public restaurant and the public restrooms. In addition it is the primary entrance which is closest to the hotel and restaurant parking area. The City expects that the construction'" of the sidewalks will be completed within the next 14-21 days. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Gerard Kavanaugh Citv Planner cc: Hilliam Munroe Building inspector 11003 r�Ec�n� � c� i ARCHITECT o 1J1 LEONARDO FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ 1 N T [ A N A T 1 O: N A L PROJECT: Hawthorne Hotel FIELD REPORT NO: 17 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction Company ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE Aug . 12 , ' 87EIME I I : 00 a .m . WEATHER Sunny TEMP. RANGE 800 EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Millwork painting Jay Reis & Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Constructi cleaning , carpet work Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel Ken Bavaro & Nancy Spirito - DiLeonardo Intl OBSERVATIONS 1 . Registration Desk Area , Office Area , Restrooms : Draperies being installed , carpeting down , painting being done & cleaning and polishing . Anticipated move in on 8 / 13 . Telephones and shelf not installed yet . 2 . Restaurant : Millwork , carpeting , draperies , painting being done . Dessert area ( millwork being delivered 8 / 13 for installation . Mirrors not installed yet . Room to be 907 done by 8 / 17 . Temporary chair will be used till tt specified chair arrives . Also , booths will be delivered within 3 weeks . Gourdeau was ripping up the floor to find water leak . �jj , C* r c r 3 j (TH.OF MP ITEMS TO VERIFY 1 . DiLeonaroo to forward signage package revisions to Ken Boyles . INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED 1 It was noted by Ken Boyles that another designer was selected to design the pub and that they had already signed off on it with them . _ c- ATTACHMENTS cc : Bill Munroe , Jay Reis , Mike Harrington, Ken Boyles , John Wormley REPORT BY: Ken Bavaro , A . I . A. AIA DOCUMENT 0711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • 0 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.2DO06 page 1 of I pages all ILL, 1 63 ARCHITECT 11L �UNA .11U FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ 01 AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ 1 N T I R N A T 1 O N A L PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: . 16 . CONTRACT: GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE July 30 , 198'Pv1E 3 : 30 p .m . WEATHER Sunny TEMP. RANGE 80-85 ° EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Millwork Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo International , Inc . OBSERVATIONS 1 . Registration Desk - Restrooms - millwork finished in restrooms , ceramic tile in place , acoustic the ceiling installed . Millwork ( approx . 90% done at registration desk area ) . Carpet .and vinyl wallcovering due late week of Aug . 3 . 2 . Restaurant - millwork being applied . First coat of paint applied . C 3 . No other work at this time . r ITEMS TO VERIFY : 1 . Sidewall color at bar - P4 . rn-- 2 . Top mirror & back bar - eliminate and paint out . c J 3 . Blank wall near desert cart - provide chairrail with P2,-,below. -. 4 . Doors at kitchen adn exit door at Dining Room ."B" - Pl frame and P4 door 0 O Nm 6757W hpl, NCE^ o�! INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED N of lRiAw- I - Signaganpnrknp;P rayicionc t'n Kan Rn la 2 . Owner reviewing chair selection for dining /p uline uo ATTACHMENTS cc : BB�Munroe ; Jay .Reis' Mike Harrington : Ken Rnvlac-__ Teh„ REPORT BY: KEN BAVARO , A . I . A . AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • m 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1775 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page of pages l I L.fYi1Cl, 1 �J FIEARCHITECT ❑ D1 LLONARDO FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ F N T It R N A T 1 O N A L PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 15 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 7 /22/87 TIME 11 : 00 a .m. WEATHER Sunny TEMP. RANGE 800 EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, —) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Tile Setting Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Millwork Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel John Wormley - DiLeonardo International OBSERVATIONS 1 . Ballroom - no work at this time ; Ken Boyles said Owner will make decision on redesign of window treatment . 2 . Restrooms - walls being tiled . 3 . Restaurant - proceding with millwork . 4 . Second Floor - no work at this time . 5 . Lobby - registration desk installed selected same wallcovering as in public restroom corridor for hall to offices w/added chairrai 6 . Owners reviewed alternate fabrics for coverlets and will select their own from fabrics provided by Pauline Re . 7 . Reviewed awning drawings provided by Jamie Harris , and instructed existing canopy ceiling to be cleaned up , repaired & painted gloss black as most economical way of improving appearance . ' ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS cc : lD I M"- u--e-' Tay Reis : Mike Harrington : Ken Boyles : Ken Bavarn REPORT BY: JOHN WORMLEY AIA DOCUMENT 0711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • m 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page I of I pages VWNLK LJ AKCHITECT S ARCHITECT ❑ DI LEONARDO FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ 1 N T IE R N A T 1 O N A t PROJECT: Hawthorne Hotel FIELD REPORT NO: 14 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055.00 DATE 7/13/87 TIME 11: 15 a.m. WEATHER Cloudy TEMP. RANGE 80-WF EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Framing, millwork, sheetrock Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo International, Inc. OBSERVATIONS 1. Ballroom: No work at this time. 2. Back of Lobby: No work at this time. 3. Offices, Restrooms: A. Millwork being applied to walls. Taping & plastering on remainder of areas. B. Millwork being applied to walls at restroom corridor and telephone niches. Vanity counters in place in restrooms. ( 4. Restaurant: Millwork at base, chairrail, window casings, etc. , in place (approx. 90% complete) . Framing around bar and desert cart area in place. Sheetrock to be installed after building inspector's inspection. French doors in place along with sprinkler heads. 5. Second Floor: No work at this time. Aa%N 6k-$ SHB rF 47 on ITEMS TO VERIFY 1. Column finish at registration desk. 2. Wall treatment at doors 109 & 110 in restaurant. INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED 1. Cherrywood bar top' Unsatisfactory to this office recommend replacement. It is understood,, because of time factor, the Owners wish to keep it as is. ATTACHMENTS CC: Bill Munroe; Jay Reis; Mike Harrington' Ken Boyles; John Wormley REPORT BY: Kenneth Bavaro, A.I.A. AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • m 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page 1 of I pages OWNER ARCHITECTS ARCHITECT o ` DI LEONARDO FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 6717 FIELD ❑ E N . T [ IN w A T 1 O w w ry PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 12 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 7 / 1 /87 TIME 11 : 00 a .m . - WEATHER Sunny TEMP. RANGE 75-80 °F EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE - Framing , Mechanical , Dave Bourque - Gourdeau" Construction Electrical , Millwork Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo International , Inc OBSERVATIONS 1 . Ballroom : Louvers at hvac units under windows to be installed . Chande- liers have been lowered to 12 ' 0" A. F .F . 2 . Back of Lobby : No work at this time . 3 . Offices , Restrooms : a . Installing registration desk unit . Walls are sheet-rocked ready to be taped . Ceiling framin in place - ready for sheetrock . Steel beam in front of registration desk t:o be protected with gypsum board . b . Restrooms sheetrocked and taped - ready for the work . Fixtures on site - ready to be installed . 4 . Restaurant : Rear Dining (90% ) of wood work installed . Dave to verify return air vent at booth seating wall . Louver to fit between base and chairrail . Front Dining ( 50% ) of French doors installed . Working on the rest . Framing d misc . work around bar area (millwork coming in this week ) . Oak trim REPORT BY: KENNETH BAVARO , A . I . A . AIA DOCUMENT 6711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA® • m 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.2DO06 page I of 7 pages ARCHITECTS AROWCHITECT o DI LEONARDO ::,FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ ' AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ 1 N T I[ [I N A T 1 O N A L / PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT.NO: 12 (CONT ' D ) ( PAGE 2 ) 1 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE Same TIME Same WEATHER Same TEMP.RANGE Same EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE — OBSERVATIONS (Cont ' d ) at windows being installed . Sprinklers yet to be installed on eacl side of French doors . 5 . Second Floor : No work at this time - Doors to be painted and hardware installed . Wood rails at stairs to be. 'painted . AED AR�j� ITEMS TO VERIFY 1 . Draperies at restaurant & ballroom & v �� A` 0A � O � office . [� r ►' 2 . Wine rack at front dining. 3 NO. h 3-. Table at rear restaurant. ql PS ATTACHMENTS r • Bill M n n T �7 R ' s • Mike Harrington ; Ken Boyles ; John Wormley REPORT BY: KENNETH BAVARO , A . I . A . AIA DOCUMENT 0711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • m 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page2 of 2 pages OWNER ARCHITECTS ARCHITECT o DI LEONARDO FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ 1 N T [ A N A T 1 O N A V Hawthorne Hotel B0ARn (ll- J'i nit'` / PROJECT: FIELD REPORT NO: I 0 l CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCH ITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 47'a igi'I 0 DATE F, /q �R 7 TIME I I _ g 0 a .m . WEATHER Sunny TEY.'tP. Ar 5 (ST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE I+, -1 ({ri t,E i V E'.) - I b JSrLlvt � i�. r WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE _Framing.: Electrical ; Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Plumbing ; HVAC Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo International , Inc . OBSERVATIONS 1 . Ballroom : Terrazzo floor being grinded . HVAC units installed , carpenters reworking wood panelling under windows and installing new chair rail . Z_ Back of Lobby Area : No work at this time . 3. Offices , New Restrooms , Retail : Retail shop complete , tenant moved in . Offices and restrooms all framed and mechanicals are approx . 807 / roughed- in . Drywall scheduled to be installed next week . 4 . Restaurant : Minimal work at this time , wood framing still in progress in Dining Room "A" . 5 - Sarond Floor Corridor & Metting Rooms : Carnet installed throughout . Rooms 997 complete with minimal punch list type items left . 6 . Exterior : Painting of woodwork in progress . C2 No.6757 W ITEMS TO VERIFY J EWCENCt' Sp HOF INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED t cc : Bi-11:Hun-roe<;' Jay ,.Reis ; •.-Mike ;Harrington.; 'Ken Boyles ; Bohn 41or:m•ley .. ATTACHMENTS . ,� Ken Bavaro , . A_ I A x � T��AIA DOCUM[Ni L711 ARCHITECT 5 fIEID:REPORT •,OCTOBER i97LEDITION 'AIA r m 1972 }a.x r �`,�.. -Y.. � � "�ITHE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OFf+�RCHtTECTS'�06yT75 NEW YORK AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20W6 ern,�+ '� �Page�, i� Zf AI 4��'.y�PaBef x I p J.;�4: Jnyar Y � A{'"��'T' 7Cjy�. ^'�• �M"lA�.�#, 'S � x1l Y,��9� � x.� ',! �� C� ,d.� }�' ! �y�V��f'�l �-!,� .s_.y?. __r",tar a ,,.A,.:xr v �.�x ':[.. �1 �.Y 9"r°� f ':+Y > _ ..wK '",.CLr ✓ �..re. Ja ,<:aF ^',f;+,R:t.a e• ;;(tlr.-. OWNER ARCHITECT'S ARCHITECT oD I LEONARD O FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ 1 N T [ R N A T 1 O N A L / PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 8 CONTRACT: GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 5/ 19 /87 TIME 11 : 00 a .m . WEATHER Partly Sunny TEMP. RANGE 600-65 °F EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Demolition ; Painting ( interior Jay Reis - Gourdeau Construction & exterior ) ; Framing ; Plumbing ; Dave Bourque -Gourdeau Construction HVAC ; Electrical ; Drywall Ken Bavaro -DiLeonardo International , Inc . OBSERVATIONS 1 . Ballroom : No work at this time - approx . 80% of window sills have been prepared to receive new hvac units . 2 . Back of Lobby Area : No work at this time . 3 . Back of Offices (at new registration desk ) and First Floor Restrooms : Restrooms demolished . Area being prepared for new framing - plumbing & HVAC is roughing in work . Corner retail space being framed in . Gyp . I Board walls extended to underside of floor deck . New office and conference room, approx . 80i, rough framed . 4 . Restaurant : Dining Room "A" ; walls , and ceiling being framed in , misc . mech . work in progress . Dining Room "B" ; walls and ceiling sheetrocked with 2 coats of taping and spackling . Ductwork shaft wall in corner to be complete , both framing and mechanical . 5 . Second Floor Meeting Rooms : Essex Room; Carpet being installed . Pickma Skylark & Hanna ; ceilings are installed , light fixtures being installed , walls are ready to receive wallcovering and wood trim is painted . Carpe not installed as of this]PA{);. 6 . Exterior : Exterior windows ,RED Aq�y O r° INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED 3 ME- ATTACHMENTS IR�c Bill Munroe Jay Reis , Mike Harrineton , Ken Boyles . Joh ormlev - REPORT BY: . KEN BAVARO A T A. s. , ,AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT OCTOBER 1972 EDITION % AIA® • m 1972 "r. ;, ' THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006page 1 .of I `' pages ARCHITECT'S O NER O FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: Hawthorne Hotel FIELD REPORT NO: 7 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 .00 DATE 5/12/87 TIME 11 : 30 a•m. WEATHER Sunny (Partly) TEMP. RANGE 75OF EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Demolition; painting; Jay Reis - Gourdeau Construction HVAC; plumbing David Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Drywall Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel John Wormley - DiLeonardo International, Inc . OBSERVATIONS 1. Ballroom: Installing HVAC window units. Ken Boyles was shown new window treatment to his satisfaction. He will show it to Mike Harrington and process with Pauline Re. 2 . Restaurant: HVAC and electrical work in progress. Should be three downlights in soffit over backbar; GC will work with fire marshall to install without interrupting 2-hour firewall . 3 . Second Floor Meeting Room• (Skylark k Hanna Rnoms) Painting windy trim; installing light fixtures; finishing Patching walls . 4 . First Floor Restrooms and Retail : Demolished restrooms , framed walls of retail. 5 . Ken Boyles was presented alternate drapery fabric for guestrooms which he approved and will proceed with ordering. 2 . (continued) Architect changed door mouldings to frames similar to all others in hotel . 1' " ddep to end chairrail 'and baseboard into. GC will get detail shop drawings from millworker for selection by architect. ITEMS TO VERIFY y. l U 1 '.Go 1T TTl INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS CC: FBill-Munroe,• Jay Reis; Mike Harrington; Ken Boyles REPORT BY: John Wormley AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • © 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page 1 of 1 pages OWNER ARCHITECTS ARCHITECT o DI LEONARDO . FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ 1 w T c w N A T Z O N A L AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: Hawthorne Hotel. FIELD REPORT NO: 6 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 4 /5/87 TIME 10 : 00 a .m. WEATHER Rain TEMP. RANGE 40°—= 45° EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, WORK iN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Jay Reis Gourde=au Construction Restaurant Dave Bourque -Gotr2deaU Construction nr, „ 2nd Floor Meeting Rooms Ken Boyles - Haw Ch§-rn'e' Hotel., Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo Int '--1 OBSERVATIONS 1 . Res;.Eurant : Window ' s installed , framing around windows complete . Dining Clx Room "B" final framing taking place and getting ready to Q�.i „ drywall . Existing floor has been patched and leveled . c� Q E,'W Various plumbing , hvac and electrical workers installing various items . 2 ' Remainder of First Floor : no activity at this time . 3 . Second h oor Meeting Room (Essex Room) : Room complete except for carpet installation & fabric panels on front wall . 4 . Second Floor Meeting Rooms (Skylark & Hanna Rooms ) : Stripping of wall covering and panelling complete . Metal stud suspension system for ceiling approximately 507 co 5 . Second Floor Lobb No activity at this ill to be done . rML 3 0757s ITEMS TO VERIFY 1 . Chair rail and casing details to be worked out . DiL jd �.� ish ' a sketch . 2 . New storage cabinets and low partition in Dining Room. DiLeonardo to furnish sketches per Mike Harrington ' s authorization . 3 . Fabric selections for draperies at Ballroom & Guestrooms - DiLeonardo to furnish sketches and samples . CC . Bill Munroe ; Jay Reis ; Mike Harrington ; John Wormley ; Nancy Spirito REPORT BY: KENNETH BAVARO . A . I .A . AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • © 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page I of I pages ARCHITECT'S OWNER ETECT O A FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT C771 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: Hawthorne Hotel FIELD REPORT NO: 5 CONTRACT: Gourdeau Construction ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 4 /28 /87 TIME 2 ; 30 n .M. WEATHER Rain/Snow TEMP. RANGE 40OF EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS Restaurant PRESENT AT SITE Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel David Bourque - Gourdeau Constr . John Wormley - DiLeonardo Int ' l OBSERVATIONS 1 . Contractor was finding leak in Essex Room. 2 . Reviewed millwork changes in Dining Room: a . Add low wall to hide kitchen exit into main dining area . b . Add counter for waitress pre-check . C . Add pastry cart and cabinets in alcove where duce table is . d . Increase pantry near kitchen exit at bar . a� <f CM ITEMS TO VERIFY Millwork revisions INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED Find marble ply/dessert cart . ATTACHMENTS 5 cc . : JB l'l-Mgnroe: ) Jay Reis ; Mike Harrington )H REPORT BY: John D`r Wormley ' AIA DOCUMENT 6711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA® • © 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page I of ) pages ARCHITECT'S OWNER ARCHITECT O FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ - r— PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 4 CONTRACT: GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 4 /2 1 /87 TIME 10 : 30 a . m. WEATHER C l e a r TEMP. RANGE 6 0°F EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Restaurant Jay Reis - Gourdeau Construction Cathy Lacross - DiLeonardo International , Inc n Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo International , Inc . OBSERVATIONS 1 . Restaurant : Carpenters removing and installing new windows at rear of restaurant, Framing of partitions in place . Metal suspension system for ceiling in place . Wood built-up beams built and/or .repaired . Various plumbing , hvac & electrical workders installing various items such as lighting , switches , ductwork , etc . 2 . Ballroom : No activity at this rime - mouldings and arches complete and painted . Wall light sconces in place . Hvac units will be installed approx . 2 weeks and remainder. of painting , carpe and carpentry work to be complete . 3 First Floor Lobby No activity at this time - beams in ceiling , column and portion of wall still to be covered with type 1 "X" gypsum board . 4 . Second Floor Meeting Room : Room is 909 complete - still to be done : ar carpet , fabric panels on front wall and install access in doors on hvac enclosures . ur S Second Floor Lobby : No activity at this time - 909 painted . \1 le 1y_ - REPORT BY: Ken Bavaro , A . I . A . Project Architect /Manager �- AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIAO • ® 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 - page I of 2 pages ARCHITECT'S OWNETECT O A FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 4 CONTRACT: GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE TIME WEATHER TEMP. RANGE EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT .AT SITE ITEMS TO VERIFY AND ACTION REQUIRED : n 1 . First to second floor stairway - paint spindles P-2 . 2 . Separation wall between retail space and conference room: Erect stud _.partition above to underside of floor deck with a 2 hour fire rating 3 . Second Floor Lobby : Doors to be painted as per door finish schedule . 4 . Ball Room : DiLeonardo to submit one more design scheme for drapery treatment . All doors in ballroom to be painted P-3 and door 104 on Lobby side to be painted P-2 . Also , on door 105 , provide kickplate and pushplate as discussed with Jay Reis . 5 Gourdeau to provide sketch and cut on Iigh rr i n,g for 2nd fInnr - meeting rooms . 6 . Ball Room: Wall light sconces , the candle portion of lamp lean inward towards wall ; these should be vertical ; contractor to verify with manufacturer for correction of this situation . CC • 4B 11=Munroe Jay Reis ; Ken Bavaro Cathy Lacrocc Mike Harrington John Wormley ; Nancy Sp.irito v in jr bap man* e if _ fir 1Y_ REPORT BY: Ken Bavaro A . I . A. 1' AIA DOCUMENT G711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • O 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page 2 of 2 . .pages ARCHITECT'S ARCHITECT 13 TECT FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 3 CONTRACT: GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 DATE 4 /7 /87, TIME 10 : 30 a .m. WEATHER Rain TEMP. RANGE 40 °F EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Ballroom Jay Reis - Gourdeau Construction Rear Lobby Wall Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Second Floor Meering Room Ken Royl - Hawl- harnp Hnr 1 John Wormley & Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo Lnter ' l OBSERVATIONS 1 . Ballroom : Carpenters applying mouldings and arches to newly opened arch windows ; approx . 809 complete . Painters painting and preparing walls , approx . 509 complete . 2 Rear Lobby Wall - Approx . 509 of wall adjacent to kitchen covered with type "X" gypsum wallboard . Rest of area yet to be done 3 . Second Floor Meeting Room - Carpenters demolishing existing wood panelling from walls and plastered ceiling and suspension system . ITEMS TO VERIFY : Lighting Design for second floor meeting rooms - Tavern Design INFORMATION OR ACTION RFOIiTRFD ' Input from owners for rnvPrn Cisig after their review cc : John W . ; Jay Reis ; Ken Bavaro ; ED AB x NO-6757 4, Z, EN gS f- REPORT BY: KEN BAVARO A I A AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA® • O 1972 01 pages THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page ARCHITECTS ARCHITECT DI LEONARDO NER FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT G711 FIELD 1 N T [ R N A T 1 O N A t. / PROJECT:: HAWTHORNE HOTEL FIELD REPORT NO: 2 r; CONTRACT: GOURDEAU CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 86055 . 00 r—DATE 3 /3 1 /8 7 TIME 11 , 00 a . m . WEATHER Rain TEMP.RANGE 55 0 EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE I+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS - PRESENT AT SITE Restaurant Jay Reis - Gourdeau Construction Rear Lobby Dave Bourque - Gourdeau Construction Registration Desk Area Ken Boyles - Hawthorne Hotel Ballroom; Second Floor Corr . Ken Bavaro - DiLeonardo International OBSERVATIONS 1 . Restaurant - Framing of partitions taking place . All penetrations in floor/ceiling slab being filled with concrete and steel beams and columns protected by gypsum wallboard as detailed on drawings . various plumbing , hvac , and electrical workers doing various demolition as req ' d , 2 . Rear Lobby - Demolition and cleaning in progress . Preping steel columns and beams to receive gypsum board enclosures . / 3 . Registration Desk Area - Demolition and cleaning in progress . Layiniz.. out work for new partitions . 4 . Ballroom - Demolition of window tops ( arch . windows ) and reworking mouldings . Painting approx . 307 done in this area . 5 . Second Floor Corridor - Painting of corridor walls in ro. re o ~ No F— ITEMS TO VERIFY �' ��/DENCE' Light fixture LT- 18 at Essex Room rift OFM Hardware Schedule Revisions ; Revised Telephone Locations INFO!MATION.OR ACTION REQUIRED cn J £� Lo11� ATTAQEIMENTS`i s+ REPORTBY:tiKen Bavaro Project Architect /Manaar>r I AIA DOCUMENT 0711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION - AIA® • m 1972 r-1f13 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20606 1 1i) irl 1p0gk of 1 pages cc: Building inspector City Clerk Mei IT'Storical COMMISSIM CITY HALL. SALEM. MASS. 01970 744-4580 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction (x) ; demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration (x); painting ( ) ; sign or other _ appurtenant fixture O work as described below in the . .. Salem Common Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Property: 18 Washington Square West Name of Record Owner: Hawthorne Inn Management Corp. , Inc. .r DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Remove and lower existing windows and replace with new colonial wooden windows 1 3/4" thick. Also, to replace a false door with a window to match the proposed colonial windows as per plans revised and amended at the April 16th meeting of the Salem Historical Commission. will be appropriate ,to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: April 25, 1986 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By Chairman JOHN F. BUTTERWORTH & CO. Ad/us(ery FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES ONLY C� 4, �y�:x"T P.O.BOX 238.NE WTONVILLE.MA 02160 TELEPHONE:(8 17)969-6370 ,April 24, 1986 '01( 4.1( lJlf..ly� FySJ. Form of Notice of Casualty Loss to Building PQ 6 L Under Mass.Gen. Laws, Ch. 139, Sec. 3B I l0 T0; Building Commissioner or Board of Health or Inspector of Buildings /Board of Selectmen City Hall addresses NA ) RE: Insured: Hawthorne Inn Property Address: 18 Washington square west Salem, MA Policy No. SVPD12828706 I N A Loss of Water Damage 4%9/86 File or Claim No. 66-265 Claim has been made involving loss, damage or destruction of the above captioned property, which may either exceed $1 ,000.00 or cause Mass.Gen.Laws, Chapter 143, Section 6 to be applicable. If any notice under Mass.Gen.Laws, Ch. 39, Sec. 3B is appropriate, please direct it to the attention of the writer and Include a reference to the captioned insured, location, policy number, date of loss and claim or file number. If no reply is received from your office within ten days, we will assume you have no liens of any type against this property and we will recommend to the insuring company that this claim be paid. Adjuster 1 " United States Testing Company, Inc. Engineering Services Division Go) 1415 PARK AVENUE • HOBOKEN, NEW JERSEY 07030 201-792-2400 EST. IBRO REPORT OF TEST COURISTAN, INC. 919 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK, N. Y. 10022 SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 PROJECT CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX. OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS !' TEST REPORT NO. Testing Su vised by: 76974-3 Srank Pepe IID�RE O�MP�ANYL Assistant Vice President RECE, 4 gy Robert H. Engineering Division Weyer Irllli U4 Senior Project Engineer 4987 Fire Technology Section mg Gourdeau Construction Co; Laboratories in: New York • Chicago 0 Los Angeles • Houston • Tulsa • Memphis • Reading • Richland NIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES IDENTIFIED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S)TESTED.THE TEST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OR EPRESENTATIVE OF THE DUALITIES OF THE LOT FROM WHICH THE SAMPLE WAS TAKEN OR OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. NOTHI i THIS REPORT SMALL MEAN THAT UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY. INC.. CONDUCTS ANY DUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE CLIENT TO WHOM MG CONTAINEDTHIS TEST BE. )RT 15 ISSUED. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SPECIFIED. OUR REPORTS AND LETTERS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ANE ADDRESSE ND THEY AND THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. OR ITS SEALS OR INSIGNIA. ARE NOT TO BE USED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCD, ES IN ESSED, SING TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND MAY NOT BE USED IN ANY OTHER MANNER WITHOUT OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. SAMPLES NOT DESTROYED TE RETAINED A MAXIMUM OF THIRTY DAYS. IN TESTING UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. 76974-3 l REFERENCE: Couristan, Inc. letter dated August 20, 1979 i I ' TEST PERFORMED: j The submitted sample was tested for Critical Radiant Flux in accordance with the procedures outlined in Federal Test Method Standard No. 372, Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Carpet Flooring Systems (Flooring Radiant Panel Test) . This test procedure is identical to NFPA 253, ASTM E648, and NBSIR 75-950. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: 'I One (1 ) sample of carpet submitted and identified by the Client as: i Quality Name: Royalax Construction: 80% Wool 20% Nylon Pitch: 189 Rows: 8 Pile Height: .266 I -1_ J UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. 76974-3 i PREPARATION AND CONDITIONING: j The carpet was placed over an underlayment*. No adhesive was used. The mounting of the underlayment was such that the non-skid waffle design faced the floor side and the non-skid ribbed design faced the carpet back. This mounting technique is in accordance with Federal Specification DDD-C-001023 (GSA-FSS) . The specimens were conditioned at 700 + 50F and 50 percent relative humidity. — TEST PROCEDURE: The test chamber was thoroughly pre-heated and allowed to stabilize with the radiant panel at a black body temperature of 500 + 50C. The pilot burner was ignited and the specimen inserted into the chamber. After a two minute pre-heat, the pilot burner flame was EI placed in contact with the specimen for ten minutes, then removed. The test was continued until all flaming ceased. The distance burned was measured and converted to Critical Radiant Heat Flux at flame out. The operation of the test chamber was checked by performing a flux profile measurement at the 40 cm point on the day of the test. i i *Standard underlayment: Type II R bber coated jute and animal hair (rubber loc) , 3/8" thick, 56 oz/yd . -2- I PFJ r UNITED STATES TESTING COMPANY, INC. 76974-3 TEST RESULTS: The test results, determined in accordance with the prescribed method of Critical Radiant Heat Flux, are as follows: *Critical Radiant Heat Flux, Test Specimen Watts/cm2 1 0.55 2 0.52 3 0.59 Average 0.55 Standard deviation 0.035 *See graph appended at the end of this report. , OBSERVATIONS: Ignition was noted along with charring, melting, and slight bubbling of the specimens upon pilot contact. The specimens burned a maximum distance of 37 cm in 15.3 minutes, 39 cm in 12.6 minutes, and 25 cm in 12.2 minutes respectively. I -3- 1 0 00 Rollo 0 09 a ME NEM 0 mom MEN :eeeo�9 ��ese. ill �� ii• ' e • ' � 'e � '� � ipan I i': . iMINN!; � i6 ii � �eede� �n �il � � ! � ii � � i �l � m111 �e � ��8 .� �� evmeem �pi � ��MINI11111111111111111110� iMON 9 �� u a s aie eg0on � �� E_ ? a6 � e �E ! �� v � �� m ! � E�k � � MEMO emv=� � ndE � IN nv! Bim � + � �jmim ,N� :�ig• 9INN aB �I��l9iilBBlBl9!!! llivil �l �ai � EL �!!!llii� ONEE �p a �MENNEN � Jn n � � �� msi �� .11111110111111.1eonmemii �9i � i�Blii� eiBi� n� � a 'p ei � ni9 � � � 9 � � e�e� Mmmmee m 1vee1111111111MI�oxn �i9eiiiiniil � m �7iii� lel ! ! m9 �axeoiB� minfil ! � !l1fi . � n�� e: eeiaa � eIBleIIS!! � eHORMONES v : � SEEN ME 01MIUM on . No pp=iiiiiia !9!!! !! �MINN NONE mom n n�e� �e�ae�� !. � !'n � llliii �riii�� iii ' ° iiBuneei�mi��n��a3EBl��n! ��9��:'�fl�� 9 ��l.�alK�l6a�me�lm�u� m�� MonossonCIS '9 •C ••mom 3.. Z.3 -11111111:111 JillflN �1 1 �� iie. as w on e��xe � eeMERS aw �. � lHimON n � �8�9�9 �ome� � � n '- -. �e e � nn iliiiii�� i i� iiei�! Bi! ��lt� !!. !9B! 1lye Ili�l�i�m �e e CII •":� �::2000�. :�: 7y C• :':�_: O:�OCi1��- •■Hell ••• 0111 BII ��Yll�a�l�e�liii_�ginii9im�i'mi�ii-�g� limlmnlmmmimmmgmmmmmm! n�a��"��ee�i9i.�. !liii�!�9@iiiiiiiit! °��!!.�!!!!Lyl�� ieei°i�iiiuu 'i��E�9!!!�iiii�::�.'.�.�!l85iii�ii��9::.� i TEST FOR CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 648 Floor Covering Identified as "Twill" Report Number 50668 July 28, 1986 Prepared for: Crest Carpet Company Douglasville, Georgia This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. It may be used in its entirety to gain product acceptance from duly constituted authorities. This report applies only to those samples tested and is not necessarily indicative of apparently identical or similar products. This report, or the name of Commercial Testing Company, Inc., shall not be used under any circumstance in advertising to the general public. 7— ED ED 1AAR = 1997 Gow'deau Const;uctlo" Co: COMMERCIAL, TEST= company DALTON, GEORGIA O COt1 MERCIA16 TESTInG COMPRnY CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS USING A RADIANT HEAT ENERGY SOURCE ASTM Standard Method of Test E 648-84 Floor Covering Identified as "Twill" Report Number 50668 Test Number 1727-3460 July 28, 1986 Prepared for: Crest Carpet Company Douglasville, Georgia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY gv,9"j Jonathan Jackson Executive Vice President TESTING • RESEARCH • ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215 S. HAMILTON ST. - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 Report Number 50668 .Test Number 1727-3460 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION This report represents results of a test for critical radiant flux of a floor covering system submitted by Crest Carpet Company. This test, also known as the Flooring Radiant Panel, is identical to the Federal Test Method Standard Number 372 and the National Fire Protection Association Test Method Number 253. It measures the critical radiant flux at flame-out of horizontally mounted complete flooring systems exposed to a flaming ignition source in a graded radiant heat energy environment. It is intended to simulate actual conditions that have been observed and defined in full-scale experiments. The test is applicable only to floor covering systems which duplicate or simulate accepted installation practices. Tests on individual components of a system are of limited value and are not valid for evaluation of the entire flooring system. The test results apply only to the specimens tested and are not necessarily indicative of apparent identical or similar materials. All test data are on file and available for review by authorized persons. II. PURPOSE The Flooring Radiant Panel test measures the level of incident radiant heat energy on the floor covering system at the most distant flame-out point, and is expressed as Critical Radiant Flux in watts per square centimeter. It provides a basis for estimating one aspect of flamespread behavior for floor covering systems installed in corridors or exitways of buildings. The imposed radiant flux simulates thermal radiation levels likely to impinge on the floor of an exitway or a corridor whose upper surfaces are heated by flame and/or hot gases from a fully developed fire in an adjacent room or compartment. III. TEST PROCEDURE A minimum of three (3) sets of the floor covering system must be tested. A specimen measuring 20 centimeters by 100 centimeters is mounted in a horizontal specimen holder in the test chamber. A gas/air fueled radiant heat energy panel. is mounted in the chamber at a 300 angle to the horizontal specimen plane. The radiant panel generates an energy flux distribution ranging along the 100 centimeter length of the test specimen of approximately 1.0 watts per square centimeter to a minimum of 0.1 watts per square centimeter. The test is initiated by an open flame from a pilot burner that is brought into contact with the specimen for 10 minutes. For specimens that continue to burn after the 1�1 .4,j1 `I VYY Iw 1 ,Ay ' i(' 1.1,J' 1 � •R K 1tl Report Number 50668 Test Number 1727-3460 Page 3 of 5 pilot burner is removed, the test is continued until all flame is out. The specimen is then removed from the test chamber and the point of farthest flame front advance measured. The critical radiant flux is then computed from the Flux Profile Curve determined during calibration of the test apparatus. IV. FLOORING SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The material beingevaluated, identified as Twill is described in , the Table below: Floor Covering: Test Number - 1727-3460 Identification - Twill Construction - Cut Pile Secondary Backing - Jute Color - North Star Yarn Type - Zeftron 500 - 2 ply Total Weight - 80.3 ounces per square yard Flooring System: Structural Floor - mineral-fiber/cement board Underlayment - N/A Adhesive - Taylor 295 Conditioning: Duration - 48 hours Temperature - 70 t 5°F Relative Humidity - 50 t 5 percent V. TESTING The critical radiant flux of an inorganic millboard dummy specimen was checked at the 40 cm mark on the day of the test. Critical radiant flux of 0.5 t 0.02 watts per square centimeter as measured at a distance of 40 centimeters from the 0 end of the specimen, indicated proper operation of the test apparatus. The flooring system was then tested within parameters outlined in the standard on July 28, 1986. Report Number 50668 Test Number 1727-3460 Page 4 of 5 VI. TEST RESULTS The test data for the three specimens tested are shown in the chart below and in the Tektronix 4051 computer print-out on Page 5. Material Identification - Twill Test Number - 1727-3460 Date Tested - July 28, 1986 Specimen Number 1 2 3 Distance Maximum Burn (cm) 7.0 7.5 7.1 Time to Flame-out (minutes) 10.0 10.0 10.0 Critical Radiant Flux (W/cm2) 1.08+ 1.08+ 1 .08+ AVERAGE CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX 1 .08+ W/cm2 The Standard Deviation (S ) of the three values of the measured critical radiant flux is 0 watts per square centimeter when calculated in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Manual on Quality Control, STP 15c. . Vn "�. :`s .a if1 1.s°' ` P' i � :a • :: � yr 5 }.'� �M,! U4 14:,.'3 <i,3 ASTM E 648 FLOORING RADIANT PANEL CLIENT : CREST CARPET COMPANY TEST NUMBER : 1727-3460 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION : TWILL FLOORING SYSTEM : DIRECT GLUE-DOWN DATE : 28 JUL 86 TEST RESULTS: #1 #2 #3 MAXIMUM BURN DISTANCE (CM) : 7. 0 7. 5 7. 1 FLAME OUT (MINUTES) : 10. 6 10. 0 10. 0 - CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX: >1 . 08 >1 . 08 >1 . 08 AVERAGE CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX = >1 . 88 1 . 2 R 1 . 1 PANEL TEMPERATURE 500 C A 1 . 0 GAS FLOW 0. 180 NCMH D 0. 9 AIR FLOW 690 SCFH 10. 8 PANEL PRESS 0. 25 IN WC A TRANSDUCER N 0. 7 MFG MEDTHER.M T 0. 6 MODEL 64-2-20 0. 5 SERIAL NUMBER 92055 F CAL MEDTHERM 07/85 L 0. 4 CONY. FACTOR 0. 2365 U 0. 3 X 0. 2 - 0. 1 . 28. 1 0 0 90 100 DISTANCE (CM) CREST CARPET fNi_ AUG 12 1986 ELECTROSTATIC PROPENSITY OF CARPETS IT�1 T �u ( 7 TT AATCC Test Method 134 JL.J U Material Identified as "Twill" Report Number 51002 AW 1 51 . August 8, 1986 Prepared for: Crest Carpet Company Douglasville, Georgia This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. It may be used in its entirety to gain product acceptance from duly constituted authorities. This report applies only to those samples tested and is not necessarily indicative of apparently identical or similar products. This report, or the name of Commercial Testing Company, Inc., shall not be used under any circumstance in advertising to the general public. IUDO Ue COMMERCIAL. TESTIIIG compAIIY DALTON, GEORGIA ® o ® COMMERC1A1, TESTIns C01?IPAny ELECTROSTATIC PROPENSITY OF CARPETS AATCC Test Method 134 Material Identified as "Twill" Report Number 51002 Test Number 1727-3461 August 8, 1986 Prepared for: Crest Carpet Company Douglasvllle, Georgia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY JonathanJackson v � Executive Vice President a TESTING • RESEARCH • ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215 S. HAMILTON ST, - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 INTRODUCTION This report is a presentation of results of a static test done in accordance with the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists and Colorists (AATCC) Test Method Number 134, "Electrostatic Propensity of Carpets". The results of this test relate only to the carpet specimen tested. Unless otherwise stated, the carpet was tested as received. Its static performance may be altered in service as a result of wear, soiling, or cleaning. All test data are on file and are available for review by authorized persons. PURPOSE The purpose of the static test is to assess the static propensity of carpets under controlled laboratory conditions simulating conditions which may exist in actual installations. The most important factors in determining the static charges are: (1) the two dissimilar materials creating the static charge, i.e. , the carpet and the shoe soles; (2) the nature of the rubbing or separation of the materials, i.e. , stepping or scuffing; and, (3) the ambient atmospheric conditions. TEST PROCEDURE A carpet sample measuring 27" x 36" is conditioned at 70° t 2°F and 20 t 2 percent relative humidity until moisture equilibrium is obtained. The test equipment is checked for proper operation and calibration by testing control nylon carpet specimens, with and without electrically conductive fiber antistat, having known test results. Both the sample to be tested and, if used, the jute hair pad are neutralized of any residual static charge on both the face and back sides. The test shoes are then cleaned and the test performed. Characterization of the static propensity of the carpet is achieved by performing the following tests: Test I - The step test is performed by normal walking on the surface of the carpet for one minute wearing test shoes with Neolite soles and heels. Test II - The scuff test is conducted by scuffing or wiping the shoes in a backward motion for one minute wearing shoes with Neolite soles and heels. Resulting voltages are measured and recorded during a one minute test period. MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION Style - Twill CTC Test Number - 1727-3461 Construction - Cut Pile Secondary Backing - Jute TEST PROCEDURES Conditioning: Temperature - 70°F Relative Humidity - 20% Underlayment - Jute/Hair Pad Shampoo - None TEST RESULTS I II Neolite Neolite Step Scuff kilovolts -0.1 -0.7 -0.3 -0.2 a s 3 u S i ..is rf. ... -I JUL '3 o 1985 I 'I SPECIFIC OPTICAL DENSITY OF SMOKE GENERATED BY SOLID MATERIALS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 662-79 GSA Flaming Requirement Material Identified as "Twill" Report Number 50629 July 25, 1986 Prepared for: Crest Carpet Company Douglasville, Georgia This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. It may be used in its entirety to gain product acceptance from duly constituted authorities. This report applies only to those samples tested and is not necessarily indicative of apparently identical or similar products. This report, or the name of Commercial Testing Company, Inc., shell not be used under any circumstance in advertising to the general public. ® o C011 MERCIAt, TESTIIIG COMPAnY DALTON, GEORGIA ® o ® 4010i COMMERC1Ah TESTInG COMPAnY SPECIFIC OPTICAL DENSITY OF SMOKE GENERATED BY SOLID MATERIALS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 662-79 GSA Flaming Requirement Material Identified as "Twill" Report Number 50629 Test Number 1728-3509 July 25, 1986 Prepared for: Crest Carpet Company Douglasville, Georgia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY Jonathan Jackson Executive Vice President TESTING • RESEARCH • ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215 S. HAMILTON ST. - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 Report Number 50629 Test Number 1728-3509 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION This report represents results of the smoke chamber test on a material submitted for testing by Crest Carpet Company. The test was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Method of Test E 662-79, "Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials." This method, also known as the NBS Smoke Chamber, is identical to the method described in the National Fire Protection Association Number 258-1976. It is used solely to measure the smoke density characteristics of a material under controlled laboratory conditions. It should not be used for the description, appraisal, or regulation of the hazard of a material under actual fire conditions . No consideration is made for results that may be obtained if the material being evaluated were tested in combination with other materials. The test results apply only to the specimens tested and are not necessarily indicative of apparent identical or similar materials. All test data are on file and are available for review by authorized persons. II. SCOPE The smoke density chamber test is used to determine the specific optical density of smoke generated within a closed chamber due to non- flaming pyrolitic decomposition and flaming combustion. The non-flaming mode employs an electrically-heated radiant energy heat source with an irradiance level of 2.5 watts per square centimeter. For the flaming mode, a six-tube burner, fueled with a propane/air mixture, is used in combination with the radiant heat to apply a row of equidistant flamelets across the lower edge of the specimen and into the specimen trough. A photometric system with a vertical light path is used to measure the varying light transmittance as smoke accumulates. The light trans- mission measurements are used to calculate the Specific Optical Density, which is derived from a geometrical factor associated with the dimensions of the test chamber and specimen, and the measured optical density, a measurement characteristic of the concentration of smoke. The photometric scale used to measure the smoke generated in this test is similar to the optical density scale for human vision. III. TEST PROCEDURE Specimens measuring three (3) inches square are taken from the specimen to be evaluated. Specimens are enclosed with heavy-duty alum- inum foil and mounted in troughed specimen holders backed with a } inch iJri I rT l i •;.: +4u 1.wr J a Y .. •. .. .. .�L 1..✓�( Y Z�' ffi PT M �t.� S �� Al�.a ku. .J � L� � 4 +Nt � Y 4: Report Number 50629 Test Number 1728-3509 Page 3 of 5 inorganic millboard block. The samples are pre-conditioned for twenty- four (24) hours at 140°F, and then conditioned to equilibrium at 70°F and 50 percent relative humidity. The test method consists of three (3) exposures in the flaming mode and three (3) exposures in the non-flaming mode . However, in many instances, the code requirement will be the same as for the General Services Administration where the flaming mode only is required. For those tests, only the flaming mode is done and reported. The test chamber is pre-conditioned to a ready state and the irrad- iance level of the radiant heat energy source is verified. The 100% and 0% transmittance of the photometric system is calibrated. The specimens mounted in the troughed specimen holders are tested in the appropriate mode for the evaluation being done, whether flaming only or both flaming and non-flaming. The test period is for twenty (20) minutes or until minimum light transmittance is obtained, whichever occurs first. The test chamber is then evacuated of the accumulated smoke. Another light transmittance reading is taken and recorded as the clear beam reading. This is the accumulation of soot and other effluent on the optical system and is converted to specific optical density and used as a correction factor in calculating final test results. The recorded data for light transmittance is used to calculate the specific optical density of the smoke generated during the test for each of the specimens tested. The results are then averaged and reported as Average Specific Optical Density. IV. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL TESTED The material being evaluated, identified as Twill, is described in the Table below. CTC Test Number - 1728-3509 Date Tested - July 25, 1986 Identification - Twill Construction - Cut Pile Carpet Yarn Type - Zeftron 500 Secondary Backing - Jute Color - North Star Weight - 80.4 ounces per square yard i s . s fii . ♦»... ,.. .ii d w..s Report Number 50629 Test Number 1728-3509 Page 4 of 5 V. TEST RESULTS The test results are presented as an average of the specimens test- ed in each exposure mode required for the specific evaluation. The test results are shown in the following table: Flaming Twill 213 The Tektronix 4051 computer print-out for data obtained during the test is shown on the final page of the report. The following list of abbreviations and their meanings are used in the print-out and may be useful in interpretation of test data. 7,T is the percent light transmission ranging from 100% to 0% transmittance. Ds is the specific optical density. Dm is the maximum specific optical density. Dc is the specific optical density value of the clear beam reading (correction factor) . Dm (corrected) represents Dm - Dc and is the corrected maximum specific optical density, the number which, when averaged, is the final test result. Time to Ds=16 is the time at which 75% light transmittance is obtained, which yields a specific optical density of 16. Dm @ 1.5 and 4.0 minutes are shown because some aerospace and aviation agencies require these time criteria in judging the smoke development characteristics of a material. NOTE: Dm @ 4.0 minutes may be higher than Dm (corrected) because no allowance is made for the accumulation of soot on the photometer system. 1 Ep k Al�' ns' NBS SMOKE DENSITY CHAMBER HFPA 258/ASTM E 662 CLIENT: CREST CARPET COMPANY CTC TEST #: 1728-3509 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION: "TWILL' DATE: 7-25-86 CHAMBER OPERATING CONDITIONS: RADIOMETER READING 8.03 mV RADIOMETER IRRADIANCE = 2. 50 WATTS/SQ CM FURNACE VOLTAGE = 95. 0 VOLTS PROPANE 2 50 CC/MIN (FLAMING) = 88 AIR @ 500 CC/MIN (FLAMING) = 104 CHAMBER TEMPERATURE 95 + DEG F CHAMBER PRESSURE _ <3. 8 INCHES WATER TEST RESULTS: FLAMING SPECIMEN # 1 2 3 :T(max) 2. 40000 2. 10800 1 . 28000 Dm 214 221 254 TIME TO Dry 3. 0 3. 1 3. 3 Dc 16 16 17 Dry (CORRECTED) 198 205 237 TIME TO Ds=16 1 . 8 1. 8 1 . 7 SMOKE COLOR GREY GREY GREY Dm AT 1 . 5 MIN 2 2 1 Dm AT 4. 0 MIN 214 221 254 AVERAGE. CORRECTED Dm 213 Wallcovering and Upholstery 132 WEST 21st STREET • NEW YORK, N.Y. 10011 • (212) 255-3300 • TWX# 710-5875760 W-G VINYLS, NYK February 13, 1987 DiLeonardo Interiors 2346 Post Road Warwick, RI 02886 ATTENTION: Ms. Carol Schauer Dear Ms. Schauer: Please be assured that upon receipt of an order for our wallcovering, we will produce the material listed below in accordance with ASTM E-84 (Tunnel Test) , with the following fire hazard classification ratings: MATERIAL FLAME SPREAD RATE SMOKE DEVELOPED FACTOR Multitone MLT 2-8464 Lodestone 15 20 We trust that the above information will prove satisfactory for your needs and that we will be favored with your order. Thank you for your interest and consideration. Yours truly, WOLF-GORDON INC. DANIEL CARUSO DC:ajc * City of Salem, Massachusetts Fire Department 48 Lafayette Street David Cody Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 Fire Prevention Chief Tel.. 978-744-1235 Bureau 978-744-6990 Fax 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 dcody@salem.com October 13, 2006 Juli Lederhaus H&C Service Corporation DBA The Hawthorne Hotel 18 Washington Square Salem MA. 01970 I have received your affidavit on behalf of the Hawthorne Hotel, 18 Washington Square Salem, Ma. Because of the manner in which you are presently conducting business (as outlined in the affidavit)you will not be held to the Fire Departments order of January 17, 2006. Please keep all employees in your establishment, now and in the future, aware of the seven key issues that have been outlined in the affidavit. In the future should you consider holding an event that may be characteristic of an A-2 like occupancy but not limited to: Low lighting levels; Entertainment by a live band or recorded music generating above normal sound levels; Later than average operating hours; Tables and seating arranged or positioned so as to create ill-defined aisles; A specific area designated for dancing; Service facilities primarily for alcoholic beverages with limited food service; and High occupancy load density, you must first apply for a permit. Under the provisions of M.G.L.c.148, s.26G1/2, 4a'paragraph, your facility may be used as a nightclub, dance hall, discotheque, or similar entertainment purposes on a temporary basis without the need to install an adequate system of automatic sprinklers under this l section. Temporary use is allowed only if a permit is issued for such use by the head of the fire department in consultation with the building inspector. The terms and conditions of the permit are at the discretion of the head of the fire department who will set the terms and conditions to protect the public against fire and preserve safety. I herby withdraw my original order dated January 17, 2006 requiring the Hawthorne Hotel of Salem operating at 18 Washington Square, to comply with M.G.L. c. 148, s. 26G1/2 the Automatic Sprinkler Law. Signed, David W. Cody Chief of Depar m t Cc; Automatic Sprinkler Appeals Board City Solicitor Elizabeth Rennard Building Inspector Thomas St. Pierre Fire Inspector Charles Holloran Attorney Joseph Correnti File