Loading...
11 WARREN STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION (2) 1 ����� �3a� �� �j EtG3!'-L�IP�� 'Je7t'T October 3 , 1985 GT 3 3 22 N !B5 To: Building Inspector RE,DEIVEA One Salem Green EIITY F S4L,EH)t4A§§: Floor Two Salem,Ma. 01970 ,•, l From: Robert R. Boulay L-1 � � W;IYJ -V !�i t Scott A. Savory W I, 5`/7 lot 80 11 War'r,�n Street 2ed Flobr - P, 0, 66W Salem,Ma. 01970 RE: Zoning Law Violation I Mr . Building Inspector , It has been brought to our attention that our third roommate , Attorney Judith Furness has been using the room adjacent to her third floor bedroom in our shared rental residence as an office to conduct her Law Practice . This zoning violation has occured for some months now. We therefore request that you enforce said zoning laws for our particular area. Thank you in advance for seeing to it that this violation be corrected. Enclosed please find a copy of her letter head showing that this is not an unjust accusation. Cordially, be y Enclosure : one copy of ccoo t/AA S vory letter head. '5x A� Ua�A� e 6 6P �SlhT 3 3 22 PM '85 ECEIVE0 �j7� 0 '9160/ �j F SAL.Eh9,MASS, �/` 7. . �617� 7ff-8df0 DEC13ION ON THE PETITION OF ANGELA NANNINI FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 11 WARREN STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following Board Members: 1 . The petitioner shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 2. The deck shall be constructed in accordance with city and state building codes. 3. Construction must be in accordance with plans submitted. 4. A Certificate of Appropriateness must be obtained from the Salem Historical Commission. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Peter Dore, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance or 1pecial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, becring the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisse4 or denied is recorded in the South Essr,x Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or Is recorded and noted m the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL' �,cnvn� qT Salem Historical Commission CITY HALL, SALEM. MASS. 01970 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has determined that the proposed construction ( ) ; reconstruction ( ) ; demolition ( ) ; moving ( ) ; alteration (x)) ; painting ( ) ; sign or other appurtenant fixture ( ) work as described below in the . . . MrTnr ; ,-A Historic District (NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT) Address of Proper t 11 Warren St.,2nd floor Name of Record Owner: Frederick Russell Chapman DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROPOSED: Replacement of existing porch with porch as submitted in plans to extend no more than 8 ' . will be appropriate to the preservation of said Historic District, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic Districts' Act (Federal Laws, Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historical Commission. Dated: 4/5/90 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By�� Chairman NSR Z 1 11 r� �i9 '9IJ (Ilitg of �alem, Aassadjusetts" FILA PQttL�1 of �1Tpeal .. p Ni.om� DECISION ON--THE-PETITION REOF ANGELA NANNINI FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 11 WARN'ST:-(UN1T #1 ) (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held March 7, 1990 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Febonio, Luzinski and Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the unit, is requesting a Special Permit to allow construction of a deck on the first floor rear. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section V111 F and 1X D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition to the proposal was expressed. 2. The deck to constructed on the first floor rear could be used by the first and second floor tenants as an egress. 3. Dwelling is composed of two condominium units, one on the first floor and one on the second. 4. The owner of the second floor unit spoke in favor of the project. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed deck will be in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience are welfare of the City's inhabitants. 2. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.