Loading...
7 WALL STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 7 %WALL STREET t fit" ofttlem, � ttssucltusetts -Snttra of —Aupett! OCT u 3 04 ii `91 C)1 -.SS C-! DECISION'ON-THE_PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE ATjT�WALL STREET (' -1 ) A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from use and density in order to allow conversion to a two family dwelling in this R-1 Zone. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The property has been used, as per variances from this Board, as a two family dwelling over the past ten ( 10) years. 2. There was no opposition submitted. 3. Continued and permanent use as a two family will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. There are several other two family dwellings in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. I • DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDIA KING FOR A VARIANCE AT 7 WALL ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Property shall remain two family so long as it remains owner occupied. 4. Petitioner shall comply with any and all conditions in prior decisions with the exception of the five year restriction. October 16, 1991 Variances Granted Richard Ard AdA���A B rmarr--� A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,If any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 dt the Mass. General Laws,Chapter 808, Ind shall be filed within 20 days the da:a of fi!in, of this decision in the office 39 ectioo 11.thee City Variance to iJ,ss. General Laws, chaptor 81 �r -r.•.;;:' pc-mit f;rcnled herein not tike effect until a copy of the ave 6ecisicn, b.:rinp, the certification o1 the City , if such Clark �a peal hasdays been elapsed and nu apeal has been filed, or that, filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted an the owner's certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL n O n W O � G.O =P of �3alvra, gassac4usetts s .rr -hr vara of c�Ype l RE. .: ., E:n p��llll\'BL '81 JUN 17 A10 :07 JUNE 10, 1981 CITY CLERK OFFICE SALEM, ; DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LYDiA.KING REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR 7 WALL STREET A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices' of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner has requested a variance for the property at. 7 Wall Street to convert the property to a two-family dwelling. A variance is required because the building is in an R-1 district where the proposed use is prohibited without - a variance. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property is easily converted to a two-family dwelling. 2. Conversion of the property is supported by area residents. 3. There are several other two-family dwellings in ;the area. 4. The conversion of this property to a two=family dwelling will not adversely affect the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of, fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique to the area because it is so easily adaptable to a two-family dwelling. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the property in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the property is located. 3. ' The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause a special hardship to the Petitioner, who because of a recent illness in her family needs the income from a second dwelling unit at this property. RECEWED DECISION - JUNE 10, 1981 - LYDIA KING - PAGE TWO 081 JUN 17 A10 :08 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM MASS, 4_ The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms and conditions: 1. The property may be used for a two-family dwelling for five years from the date of this decision. 2. Any alterations of the property will be in accordance with plans submitted to the Building Inspector in connection with an application for a building permit. 3. Petitioner will maintain existing parking at the property. 4. Petitioner will comply with all applicable fire codes. An' ony M. Feehe ry APPEAL FROM THIS MIMI, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSVVIT TO SECTI TI 17 OF THE MASI GEtiERAL LAWS. CH.AMR Cu3" X19 SYALt FE MID VA HE;i 20 ChYi AHER THE DATE OF FILMO - - - GF TTI!$ GECiSIJ'I It. THE CUXE E'F T!:E CII"! CLE :{. t PS. P° s_ nv 'r jl ,..... ,.n -- t •nil':".A."iF 3 ..'3 URA::;ED HL.;G'•;.. St..;.t Ni,;' -iid;: `.'I G:CT eT't:. P. ;.`.Tf Cr i .. ; :LG; T• FICAMM OF THU7Y CE &i "([aT 23 PA's'S t?iE 11,' e2i; k ',o GR THAT. IF SU"! AN APPEAL ItAS VEEN 77i.E, T)Vtf IT E:43 :•i'+s 7 ' uE'li'si} iti RECCRDED tit Tt: .`;:i *I ESSEX REGIS?:tY G`r D_£SS A:;D K%SE.z., ii.': :i: '"t iiir i:A: : 0 TH! roQUN - OF RECORD on IS RECORDED A,;D [TOTED 0, IM, Eli?iER'S GERTffiCATE 071TtE. sow, OF A"M A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLEM 3 w . �t Of �ialem, c assachusetfs �rY17ire Ilrpa rtcnent �lcau9ua rtrra r.nNc 48 3Lafgrttr '�-trrrt Joseph F. Sullivan �afrltt, Ong 01970 chirp Date: June 17, 1986 City of Salem RE:7_Wa11�Street Board of Appeal Lydia King One Salem Green Salem, MA •01970 Sirs: As a result of the notice received concerning the Board of Appeal hearing for the above listed name and address, the Salem Fire Department requests the following items to be placed on record: The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Variance ex- tension for the above listed property. This dwelling is currently in compliance relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors. espectfully, Norman P. LaPointe Fire Inspector cc: Appellant Building Inspector File Form #105