20 VICTORY ROAD - BUILDING JACKET 20'VICTORY ROAD
OP-2001-0060 Building Permit No.: 544-2000
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
City of Salem
BUILDING,ELECTRICAL&MECHANICAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT
This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at
Dwelling Type
0020 VICTORY ROAD in the CITY OF SALEM
.---_-------__----Xctlress__---_-----------_------__ TowrVCit y Name
IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Permit#544-2000
New Single Family Dwelling
This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and
expires -------------------------------------------- unless sooner suspended or revoked.
Expiration Date
------------------------------------------------------_-----------------------
Issued
---_---------------_Issued On:Mon May 7,2001 --------------- -- ---- -
-- ----- ---
GeoTMS®2001 Des lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc.
--------------------------------------- --------------------------
-------
0020 VICTORY ROAD 544-2000
GIS#:" 6317 " COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Map: 42
lock: CITY OF SALEM
Lot: 0069
Permit: Building
Category: 101 New Single famil', BUILDING PERMIT
Permit# 544-2000
Project# JS-2001-0727
Est. Cost: $120,000.00
Pee: $612.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO:
Const. Class: Contractor: License:
Use Group: Howard A. Squires General Contractor-Salem#1750
Lot Size(sq. ft): 7241 Owner: BELLI NOMINEE TRUST
Zoning: RI Applicant: Howard A. Squires
Units Gained:'
Units Lost: - AT. 0020 VICTORY ROAD
ISSUED ON. 12-Dec-2000 EXPIRES ON: 12-Jun-2001
TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK:
Construct new single family per plans submitted.T.J.S.
Call for Pernii to OIccupy
POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET
Inspector of Plumbing Inspector of Wiring _ D.P.W. Inspector of Buildings
Underground: Service: Meter: Footings:
Ro Rough l 2/b' % House# Foundation:
V
Final: 3 '' X",e/ Final: 3 Rough ame:
01 - Oe
- eimne� l�
Fire Department Board of Health Fireplac
Insulation:
on h: Oil: Final: &
Final: / Smoke: g'-/,
F >4L Treasury:
THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOIABY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF
ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. on
Signature:
l..
Signature: �`
Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount:
BUILDING REC-2001-000855 29-Nov-00 3899 $612.00
GeoTMS®1995 Des Lauriers&Associates,Inc.
t --
7
YSDVE AD
CITY OF SALEM
BUILDING PERMIT
.1
SI 41.
mnumm
�iYiMA�•Y��AYI�iYAYY/YOJY�
4M"i &�I�M�LOf�L11�s��{lNkYW MT 1�4/ i1>•'41A I
AmbAwmv
" __. . PV'Vv ,•. .. •..rb.rss. ��•�'i�� �_ ••'11 ••u+1'_.r4pw .-.
. .-' •:, •• ':�oni�oss► w�u�n�arnoo®�a+ . - , i1O�
�eutamersaewr � tea.► '
_aor��� aeau'wn almd
- a<�m �ewcMo�.,iae.wonq�u�9 ai..iw
S4 wo
avraaoarr��ara�.r a.aMaI II I 1 44
remuao+►«utwrreye.aa.w ,,,.s.a a
bow
t
7wBdiift1R71�ItMtld"^'^AYUOiYf""�'�""�l� " Y_?
m
AV
Ove-JtJ;b- '�►—'"`�38YiC�noa�74Mt4 _ ' ,.. :. �• .
. 41b
4ML'I
IWA 0800'
-Nicnin'a7t</titV Y•' 0
L
.r;: .. .. . - LAl1 int fG.•:mli�•::1:•.
v0i£0'd ZT:OT 6662-LS-SON
Nov 08 99 09: 55a p, t
Tania Rodrigues
19 Birch Road
Lynnfield, MA 01940
shale
To: Mr. Peter Strout Fax: (978)740-9846
From: Tania Rodrigues Date; 11/08/99
Re: 20 Victory Road, Salem MA Pages:
x Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please 0 Please 0 Please
Comment Reply Recycle
. . . . . . . . . .
I*.Strout,
Recently my bulkier went to your department in order to obtain a
building permit far a single family hone to be located at=Victory Road
At that time he was left n ad that due to the fact that this lot is
primarily located on the unimproved section of this road, a road extension would
be required.
W purchase and sales agreement with the current owner/developer
of this lot dearly states that I would not be required to do any road Improvements
or extensions and therefor I haws withdrawn ficin this purchase.The current
owner refuses to release any deposits In escrow as he does not believe me that an
extension is required.
I have spoken to your ofQce and to the Engineering Department and
both have Informed me that not only does the road need an extension but other
road Improvements such as Installing a fire hydrant and attending the City's water
and sewer malne would be required.
Could you please verify that an extension is Indeed needed so that I
may obtain a refund of my$8,200.00 deposit.
Also the current ov amddeveloper states that he had pulled a permit
with no such restrictions and therefore doe not believe me
I world appreciate your assistance as this Is a tremendous amount
of money to me and I cwvlot afford to lose It nor can loft to bund a cape on this
lot with the cost of road improvements.
Thank you so much.
I can be reached @(617)5047970 if you have any questions and your
letter can be mailed to me at the above address.
,.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nov 08 99 09: 55a p, 2
Again dw*you for yota help and hopefiully this vAll dear it up with
the cwrwd owwldeveloper who claims he has no knowledge of any road
exbenstons ever being regdred.
NDS City of Salem ward
APPLICATION
FOR
PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION
IMPORTANT-Applicant to complete all Items in sections:1, 11, Ill, IV, and IX.
+�o if I C F v ZONING
I. AT(LOCATION) G lJ DISTRICT
LOCATION 0101 smFtT
OF BETWEEN AND (CROSS SIMEEn
BUILDING twos sl EEn
`/•� �) p� ,/� LOT
SUBDIVISION �+ - lLcr/o i /'L— LOT BLOCK SIZE
II. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A - D
A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOUTION"USE MOST RECENT USE
1 ❑ New bu4dIng ReeldamUsl Nonreeldentlel
2 Q Addition fit msoenbai.enter number of naw 12 Cl One tam4y 18 ❑ Amusement.recreational
rousing units added.4 anY in pan 0. 13) 19 ❑ chinch.other mi god.
13 ❑ Two or more tam4y-Enter number 20 ❑ Industrial
3 ❑ Atemta)n(See 2 above) of units ------------— 21 0 Penang garage
4 it Rebarr molacema.t 14 i] Tmn9Lertl hotel,motel,or dormitory- 22 ❑ Seryl ce station.repair garage
Enter number of units .......__._.__
5 � Wreckrg in muttifamdy residential,enter number u 23 ❑ Hospital,nsttutioNl
of units in Wilding in Part 0. 13) 15 ❑ Garage 24 ❑ Office.bank Pmfesslonal
6 Moving(relocation) 16 ❑ Carbon 25 0 Public utility
26 ❑ School.library.otter edt4•a60nal
Foundalononly 17 ❑ Other-Specify 27 ❑ Stores.MICanlile
B.OATERSHIP 28 Q Tanks,towem
ovale(individual corporation.nonprofit 29 ❑ Other•Sfaecily
institution.etc.)
9 1-1 Public(Federal.State,or local government
C.COST (Omit cents) Nonresidential.Describe it dated Proposed use of buildings,e.g.•food Processing Plant.
machine slop,laundry building at ho dual,elementary school.secondary schod,college.
8V' ,{) parochial school•Parking gage for department store,rental office building•office budding
10. Cost of improvernarnt _.__._____--.---_._._� S V at industrial danL t use of existing building is being changed.enter proposed we.
To be installed but not included
in the above cost
a. Electrical---------_--------—
b. Plumbing —___._—___.--___
c. Heating,"conditioning
d. Other(elevator.etc.)
11. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT S
III. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING •For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E-L;demolition,
complete onlv Parts J& M, all others skip to IV
E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF HEATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL I. TYPE OF MECHANICAL
30 irt--�' �M��ason�ry(well bearing) 35 [7 Gas 40*Xublic or Private company Will them be central ti
'
31 °Imine 31tff-Otl 41 [] PrNale(sePlic lank etc.) conditioning?
32 ❑ Structural steel 37 ❑ Electricity 44�Yes 45 Q No
33 ❑ Renlorced concrete 38 Q--f Coal H. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Will there by an elevator?
34 Q DOW iJ
SWdY 39 COW Specify 42%E�PWlc or private company 46 ❑ Yes• 4LQL%.10
43 ❑ Prlrale t"I.ciatem)
J.DIMENSIONS M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES:
4e. Number M sttxles ............._...__._........_.......
49. Total square feet of floor area_
all floors,based on eztem // ff Has Approval from Historical Commission been received
dhmemarons _....................... for any structure over fifty(50)years? Yes_ No_
50. Total two area sq.ft....lG4-1.-............. Dig Safe Number
i,
N.NUMBER OF OFFSTQEEr PARKING SPACES Pest Control:
51. Enclosed_.._._............_....._._........_......
52. omeoo:...._.__............._......--- HAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED?Yes No
L RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY Water:
53. Enclosed.__.............. Electric:
5
Gas:
Fen—�_. _ Sewer.
54. Number of
bathrooms DOCUMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED
°anal——- BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
Historic District? Yes_ No-4-- (If yes,please enclose documentation from Hist Com.)
Conservation Area? Yes_ No� (If yes, please enclose Order of Conditions)
Has Fire Prevention approved and stamped plans or applications? Yes_ No-4--
Is property located in the S.R.A. district? Yes_ N04
Comply with Zoning? Yes No (If no,enclose Board of Appeal decision)
Is lot grandfathered? Yes-41�No— (if yes,submit documentationAf no,submit Board of Appeal decision)
If new construction, has the proper Routing Slip been enclosed? Yes_ No
Is Architectural Access Board approval required? Yes_ N641 (If yes,submit documentation)l7 �T
Massachusetts State Contractor License #CiQ�3 A "� Salem License # 1 / t/
Home Improvement Contractor# Homeowners Exempt form (if applicable) Yes_ No_
CONSTRUCTION TO BE COMMENCED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
,/_ If an extension is necessary,please submit
CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: r� in writing to the Inspector of Buildings.
V. IDENTIFICATION - To be completed by all applicants
Name Mailing address•Number.sweet cdy.and stare ZIP Code Tel.No.
Owner or
Lessee
Y. kk cirf(I
Coniraclor Borders
e 7i v
3. '' -LZZ> T - 1V �]L 3 34
Architect or
Engineer w
I her y rtify that the r work is authorized by the owner of recon and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application -
a is horized a e d e nee to conform to all applicable laws of this iunsdiclion. I
Si lure applicant Addr 9pplicahon datait
C�ttg of o afem, C tlassttchu5dfs
ROUTING SLIP
REVIEW AND PASS ON AS INDICATED
LOCATION:
T- DATE _ 6`13 -
APPLICANT:
gwA-A�a--
INSERT DATE WHEN PASSING ON
1nFPARTMFNT, A
Date
CONTACT PERS • Peter Caron
2 DEPARTMFNT7F
Insp- Latulippe
• y n �G 46,
. DEPT_ Public SERVICES
3
Stan Bornstein
4 DEPARTMENT:WATER DEPARTMENT
CONTACT PERSON: Helen Jiadosz
5 pEpAgTMFNT. PLANNING DEPORTMENT
Beth Debski
6DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK if involving new
CONTACT PERSON: Debbie Burkinshaw
7 DEPARTMENT:
Paul
8 DEPARTMENT:
CONTACT PERSON:
RETURN TO
56.94'
7241 SQ. FT.
h
O
0
°ss o
0
11.T
h
e PRO
N PoSED FOUNa4AON
#20
48'
0/
K
w
A=70.89'
R 194.22• 20.94'
VIC70RY 1?0AD
(UNIMPROVED)
�tN OF ,
RHONDA yc
sM. /
$ McMANUS vim/
/35041 .
P�
e,4 ES PLOT PLAN /N SALEM, MA
FOR HOWARD A. SQUIRES
DATE.• 8/13/98 SGL£.' .1' = 20' ✓OB. NO. VICTORY
LANDMARK
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC.
583 CHESTNUT STREET
LYNN, MA 01904
• ' DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
VI. VALIDATION
FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Building
Permit number
Use Grwp
e Building 19_ Fire Grading
Permit issued
Building/3 Live Loading
Permit Fee $
occupancy Load
Certificate of Occupancy $ Approved by:
Drain Tile $
Plan Review Fee $
TRLE
NOTES AND Data • (For department use)
PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO:
DATE MAILED:
Construction to be started by. Completed by.
VI ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES
DISTRICT
USE
FRONT YARD
SIDE YARD SIDE YARD
REAR YARD
NOTES
SITE OR PLOT PLAN • Fot Applicant Use
O
I
/CO .aoxck
Y/2/� 7
h. Property lines at roadway intersections shall be rounded or cut
back to provide for a curb radius of not less than thirty (30) feet.
2. Width
a. The minimum width of right-of-way improvements shall conform to
the schedule below:
Roadway Plant Sidewalk Curb
Strip
Primary 36' S 5' 611(vertical)
Collector 32' 3' 5' 611(vertical/sloped)
Minor/Dead End 24' 3' 5' 611(vertical/sloped)
The Planning Board shall in all cases determine what classification shall be
applied to all streets shown on a definitive plan. In instances where a
collector or minor street has the potential for expansion, the Planning Board
may require the street width of a primary road. In general, these
classifications will be assigned on the following basis:
Primary: street which carries through traffic, serves itself, and is fed by one
or more collector streets.
Collector: A street which serves itself, receives traffic from one or more
streets, is joined by other streets at both ends, and which by its
nature does not carry through traffic.
Minor: A street which is joined by other streets only at both ends
and provides the principal means of access for only the lots on that
street.
Dead End : A street under 500 feet in length which joins another street at only
one end.
* In instances where existing street widths are greater than 36 feet the existing
width shall be met.
3. Grade
a. Grades of streets shall be not less than 1%, and the constructed street
shall not vary more than +0.08 foot (eight one-hundredths of one foot)
from the proposed elevation as shown on the Definitive Plan.
18.
RIGHT OF 'WAY IMPROVEMENTS POLICY
SIDEWALKS CURBING GRASS STRIPS TREES UTILITIES
Subdivision of two lots Existing Existing Existing E•IFisting Existing
(no expansion possible)* Conditions Conditions Conditions Conditions Conditions
Subdivision of two lots Land reserved for Land reserved for Land reserved for Not required, but Underground unless property
(with possible expansion)* 5' sidewalk 6" granite curb 3'-5' grass strip** will be done in line is within 25' of
(sloped or vertical) future existing pole
Subdivision of 3-6 lots Five foot sidewalk Six-inch granite 3-5 foot grass 314 "caliper, 30' Underground
(Lot; on one side of street) on one side (sloped or vertical) strip** on center
Subdivision of 3-E lots Five foot sidewalk Six inch granite 3-5 foot grass 3112 "caliper; 30' Underground
(Lots on both ! Jzs) on both sides (sloped or vertical) strip on both sides** on center
on both sides
Suh-division of 3-6 lots with Five foot sidewalk Six inch granite curb- 3-5 foot grass 314 "caliper; 30' Underground
expansion pos-il-Ae for seven or on both sides (sloped or vertical) strip on both sides** on center
more lots* on both sides
Subdivision in excess of Five-foot sidewalk Six-inch granite 3-5 foot grass 3112 "caliper, 30' Underground
six lots on both sides of way (sloped or vertical) strip on both on center
upon which frontage on both sides sides**
is gained
NOPE: In inst:urces ..here existing conditions differ from the right-of-way improvements outlined in this chart, the more comprehensive conditions shall be met.
The determination of expandibility shall be made by the Planning Board and shall be in accordance with the applicable sections of the Subdivision Regulations,
Zoning; 01 oin;:nce and the Wetlands Protection Act.
idth cf g z,ss strip is 6--termined by the eventual street designation by the Planning Board.
Si: :'p
Cite of Salem, f amgarbmgewt
Public Propertp Bepartment
Wuilbing Mepartment
(One Salem Oreen
(976) 745-9595 rCxt. 360
Peter Strout
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Buildings
Zoning Enforcement Officer
` PY
November 29, 1999
Lonia Rodriques
19 Birch Road
Lynnfield, Ma. 01940
RE: 20 Victory Road
It is standard practice for the owner of a buildable lot that does not have a developed
street in front of the lot to incur the expense of running the road and utilities to the front
of the lot.
All specification to perform this work will be in compliance with the City Engineering
Department.
Sincerely
Pete t
Building Inspector
Citp of 6alem, jf1a!55aCbU!5ett5
1 Public Property Mepartment
36uilbing Mepartment
One�balem Oreen
(978) 745-9595 (fxt. 380
Leo E. Tremblay
Director of Public Property
Inspector of Building
Zoning Enforcement Officer
January 14 , 1995
Cathy Moschella
106 Lynn Street
Peabody, Mass . 01960
RE : 20 Victory Road
Dear Cathv:
Per your request I have researched the property at 20
Victory Road and I found it to have the "Grandfathered
Clause" as a buildable lot per City of Salem Zoning Code
of Ordinance .
The lot is a buildable lot , but must conform to the
required City of Salem Zoning Ordinance residential
density regulations , for proper set backs ect .
If I can be of any further assistance in this matter ,
please do not hesitate to call .
Sincerely,
z L/cam- -14-z'
Leo E. Tremblay �/
Zoning Enforcement' bfficer
LET: scm
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
e 93 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY HALL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3595
o' (508) 745-9595 Ext. 261
9�s (508) 744-9327 FAX
October 21, 1997
Leo Tremblay
Building Inspector
One Salem Green
Salem M -0--'970
Re: 20 Victory Roa arcel#42-0069)
Dear Mr. mblay:
After a review of its records, the Board has determined that during the period of 1965 to the
present, there is no evidence of any common ownership at any time between the above
property and any of the parcels immediately abutting it. Furthermore, the lot lines as they
exist today have remained unchanged since 1965.
Very truly yours,
0
Peter M. Caron
Chairman