15 UPHAM STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 15 _UPHAM STREET 1
i
i
2n0gom band ���oo� D�aoa��Qo�9 Baao
Professional Land Surveyors 8 Civil Engineers
ESSEX SURVEY SERVICE 1958 - 1986
OSBORN PALMER 1911 - 1970
K7/1 BRADFORD 8 WEED 1885 - 1972
PLOT PIAN OF LAND
LOCATED IN
SA l_C M, MASS.
CrE
o, o
m �
r ` C3
-
Pore
'^ 151>.y-
,v
3,
aT \
1 '1z S4ory
D ..vell�n9
Jo,15
Jam, 3a 113 a
o herr join.-L --r
�v P HA M ST I hereby certify to 1 V e
(3U66l �!�5ye.b'v(" that the
buildings are located•.on the
ground as own.
tSTFP
SCALE: I" ='Z0
DATE: Oc /1>%
:
REFERENCE: cEUBK 9434 PG Sol istoys er R: Me1j�QSTPL 31.31
40 LOWELL STREET
PEABODY, MASS. 01960
531-8121
_mak=
Jul I U I
b Citq ofttiem, � ttssttcljusefs'
i
J; ,$ Bourb of Au
pettl
T'
DECISION ON THE-PETITION_OF.PETER & CHRISTINE LOUF FOR
VARIANCES AT%15 UPHAM_ST.w(R`2)
A hearing on this petition was held June 27, 1990 with the following Board
Members present: Richard Bencal , Chairman; Edward Luzinski , Vice Chairman;
Joseph Correnti , Secretary; Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were
properly advertised in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owner of the property, are requesting Variances to allow existing
addition to be demolished and to construct an addition with a foundation and
add two (2) feet eight (8) inches to the addition in this R-2 zone.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings and structures in the same district.
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at
the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition or support was voiced to the plan.
2. The new addition would be built on a foundation.
3. The new addition would benefit the safety and convenience of the
inhabitants.
4. The placement of the addition in this location is the only suitable place
to put the addition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general .
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PETER & CHRISTINE LOUF FOR,
VARIANCES AT 15 UPHAM ST. , SALEM JUL iu U
page two
riLc
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimous}y;,-5-0.,._to grant- the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions :
1 . All construction be as per existing City and State Building Codes.
2. All construction be done as per plans and dimensions submitted.
3. All exterior finishes are to be in harmony with existing finishes.
4. A legal building permit must be obtained.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained for the addition.
6. Petitioner must comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department
relative to smoke and fire safety.
VARIANCES GRANTED
-Richard A. Bence - Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, If any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
after the date of filing of this decision In the office of the City clerk.
Pur;;;an: to :dos^. general Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the variance
or e-i.al Permit ?rnri'ed herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, t2arin(g the certification of the City Clerk that 20 clays have
elapsed an,, no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been
filed, that ii h:,s been dismisse4j or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
80ARD OF APPEAL)
� d, R£
� �q '. � i
n { � �
Date of Permmiitt No.of Permit Owner Architect Builder
Joe V,
Clos*dg. Ward/ / location Work Started Work Completed
Material No.of Stories No.of Tenem nts Dimensions in Feet from lot lines Sections of Code to Apply Additions Repairs
Neigh /Diimension
fY X-) ' /
Bate of Inspection Section of Cade Violated Remedied
10.15 .34 #367 Two car garage-Wood-20 20 4600
(Owner-James Brimicombe)