19 THOMAS CIRCLE - BUILDING INSPECTION� I 19 THOMAS CIRCLE
Ct� Of '-'�5E11PItt' fflassndjuseltPIT OF
�ALLH. Hec;
3 Qc Pourb of 'tAv 211 CLfRK'S OFFICE
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE BELLEAU REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 THOMAS CIRCLE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held November 19, 1997 with the following
Board members present: Gary Barrett, Chairman; Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, and
Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests a Variance from lot area, minimum lot width and use for
a single family dwelling for the property located at 19 Thomas Circle.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other land, buildings, or structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3 . Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal , after careful considerations the evidence presented at
the hearing, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner, George Belleau appeared as the contractor to represent
the owner Veto Adamo.
2. The petitioner would like to build a single family dwelling at this
location.
3. Mrs. Roberta Williams appeared and had concerns of the petition.
Her concerns was all answered and has no objection to this petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
I . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
and not the district in general .
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substation hardship to the petitioner.
For-
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE BELLEAU REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 THOMAS CIRCLE
page two
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to
public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant
the variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and approved by the Building Inspector.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any
construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Boards or Commission
having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
Variance Granted
November 19, 1997
Richard Dionne, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded incthe=South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owne-r5qf iecord
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. 7,.
<n D IV
Board of Appeal o
rn
0
n L
ZO'd lui01
LOT 218
na_sa'
LOT 211
10, 147 S.F.
LOT 212 A TP o LOT 210
a/cokJ p 'TE
OU IJATIO
o
t5�
C'Wown =
�^23p3' L=25.48
R-97 2D' R=63.58
DEED REF£f1ENCE.'
C ificgrS;y 29425
PLAN HEF£RENCE'
G.C.C. // O
I BBRB'BY czarL r rBAT TBR mw FODNDAMN
S$OSN BBRSON I8 LOCA27D ON TTL ' GROUND
ND
AS SHOW ATTLUT IT CON) AMS To r= PL 0 T PLAN
ZONING BY-LAF OF qr aff OF SALCH OF LAND IN
REGARDING FRONT, SIDE, REAR SETBACK
RSQummilrNTS. SALEM, MA
t"""OR SCALE: 1" = 30' MARCH 3, 1998
tiuCHAEL PREPARED BY
COASTAL SURVEY
e N 3m3wwa 1YADSiPORTH VILLAGE - vANvrRS BUILDING
130 CENTRE ST. - DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS
(978) 7749450
PROF SSIONAL LAND S'URVBYOR DAT$ 0' 15 30' 60' 90'
s-487
ZO'd LS:4T 866T-70-aUW
Town & Country Montes, Inc.
ul' Ncw Etlgla nd
I(i Ilul+rbuu Slreel, Peabody, MA 01960
978-17s,310-17Z4, 1'ax 1978-S.35-:1099
I AX COVER S1111 ,�l'
S'1'AITMENT Ol' CONFIDENTIALITY
This I'acsiulile Iruuswi+sign cnnblius iulklimaliou Polls TOWN 1¢ COUNURY IIUMLS, INC. 01' NI;W
I:NGLANI1. '1'he infolnwli(so collhincd is cold'ideulial and/or Inivill;rrd,lual it is iuleuded (silty for
fllc ll%c of Hill addle YYev Illus till Illi' Ilalondfnll Alvei. It yulA Ill. nol Ille llllculled addl'agsv',
Neuse vole Ihld ally disclosule,collyim{,diraribulioll or use rlf Iliis faxed iaforaadit'll is
prolliblled. If you rt•ceivc This Iarsiulilc iu crlvr, Idu+lsc iutlllodialcly uolify us by Icicllhonu
so Ilial Wu call arraugc lu IelI ieve the llocunu:ols Will 110111 Cosi to yluA,
DATE: '1'IMC:
To: 14 e a; K/ G O s M ov IM:AXONE: —)
['ROM: G P v t S e ®IJP 11x4 Ce 1•I IONI::
1•AS:
if
Nuulber of Mages iuvillding cover shceL•
Message:
a
44
/ 7~
TO'd 9S:PT 866T—Po—add
Pp tc
of LtzlPm, Cttssttl l�usettllY GF
T
3 CIEFK
PD£Ira of P2Il S OFFICE
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE BELLEAU REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 THOMAS CIRCLE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held November 19, 1997 with the following
Board members present: Gary Barrett, Chairman; Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, and
Richard Dionne. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner requests a Variance from lot area, minimum lot width and use for
a single family dwelling for the property located at 19 Thomas Circle.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other land, buildings, or structures in the same district.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal , after careful considerations the evidence presented at
the hearing, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The petitioner, George Belleau appeared as the contractor to represent
the owner Veto Adamo.
2 . The petitioner would like to build a single family dwelling at this
location.
3. Mrs . Roberta Williams appeared and had concerns of the petition.
Her concerns was all answered and has no objection to this petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
and not the district in general .
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substation hardship to the petitioner.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE BELLEAU REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 THOMAS CIRCLE
page two
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to
public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented
at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant
the variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted and approved by the Building Inspector.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any
construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Boards or Commission
having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board.
Variance Granted
November 19, 1997
Richard Dionne, Member
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date, of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in,-the=South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the ownes�Df ,record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. ;o
N� N
Board of Appeal o
nrnn -
,r
Litt/ orftt1om, Ittsttolj�zse##s
3 � �' F '1h'�tLYt2tIY[$ �LTMri�
!�
W-YCP `�2i1PIt[ �gTPPIt � -
T
r
-C
n o
TO: Deborah Burkinshaw, City Clerk �; >- ry
on err
FROM: Walter B. Pow
mn
RE: Waiver from Frontage Application - 19 Thomas Circle - Withdrawal
DATE: December 1, 1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 25, 1997, Mr. George Belleau submitted a Waiver from Frontage application to
the Planning Board for property located at 19 Thomas Circle. The application was time stamped
in your office at 9:54 A.M. Upon further review, the Planning Department has determined that
Mr. Belleau does not need the Waiver from Frontage and does not have to appear before the
Planning Board, and we therefore respectfully request that this application be withdrawn.
Thank you for your assistance.
JOB SITE COPY
11BUILDING
��CONBITT
hCV �P
#r CITY OF SALEM PERMIT
+ - ua. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
DATE JANUARY Q18 19 q8 PERMITNO.
'+.1n1 p f^fINTDV 4Jf1MFS IN�._ADDRESS 1G Lf111GRnN STREET
APPLICANT T (NO.) (STREET) (CONTR'S LICENSE)
CITY F'EAIiDDY STATE MA ZIPCODE 0115601 TEL.NO.
NUMBER OF
PERMITTO NEW TSI ITL DT NC+ _ (_) STORY ONE DAM LY DWELLING UNITS L
(TYPE OF IMPROVEMENn NO. (PROPOSED USE)
ZONING
J9 THnmesDISTRICT F2
AT(LOCATION) IND.) (STREET)
BETWEEN HT GHI
AND GVEnl1IC AND
(CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET)
SUBDIVISION MAP 018 LOT 001 4 BLOCK SIZE 11 902 SQ FT
BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION
TOTYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE)
REMARKS: PFRMTT 10 MITI TA STN('( F FAMTI Y DWFI 1 TNf' E]FR PI CANS SIIRMITTFD. R_O. R_ L1ECI!
PERAREA ORuE.! Vf, 6 1 �i,��VEl�.iJ 'Zj' DI OI DI FEEMIT� 4��. OI Q1
VOLUME �SfIMATED Cb§S'�p
(CUBICISOUARE FEET) _
OWNER ADAMfI V T TO I I BUILDING DEPT.
ADDRESS 186 HFNRY
AVE BY L.E.T.
THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TOOCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY,ENCROACHMENTS
�. ON PUBLIC PROPERTY NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION,STREET ORALLEYGRADESAS WELL
AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE
APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS.
MINIMUM OF THREE CALL INSPECTIONS APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS CARD KEPTE PAJ
WRMITS ARECABLE ED)FO TE
REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR
,.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WHERE L ELECTRICAL PLUMBING AND
2.PRIORTO COVERING STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS.
MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE.
3.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY.
POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET
BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS LUMBING PECTION APP OVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS
;.
BOARD OF HEALTH GAS PECTION APPROVALS FIRE DEPT.INS TING APPROVALS
OTHER CITU ENGINEER 2 2
WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD
INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CAN RI ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE
STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION.
AS NOTED
CERTIFI ATE OF OCCUPANCY
Issued. 2Z �; Permit #: ���
City of Salem Building De t.
i
i'
�.
I.
i
j
i
r- I
d �� 2�- �
2
,,
__ f
k
i
:' _ I
i
i
��� �' �y� �����J �������� E
d