Loading...
15 SUMMIT STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 15 SUMMIT STREET e +'' `• �it� 0{ '$alem' �Rnss djusettn f y OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE �nttra of �p�eal ,2001 AUG 22 P 2-- 58 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE COELHO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET R-1 A hearing on this petition was held August 15, 2001 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Harris and Nicholas Helides. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting Variances from side yard setback. Ordinance calls for a 10 foot setback and the proposed addition will be four feet, six inches form side lot line. The property is located in an R-1 zone. The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioner appeared and represented himself at the meeting. 2. Plans were submitted showing the proposed addition. 3. There was no opposition to the plans. r DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE COELHO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET R-1 pagetwo On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing construction. Variance Granted August 15, 2001 Richard Dionne Board of Appeal a DECISION OF THE PETITION GEORGE COELHO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 15 SUMMIT STREET R-1 page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal i I I I I c- I I T JVIAr11 � SI © SOS P(AK)! j C- -� I _ I I W,ago , � I �la9�0 74A : I I cr'o� I I I i f It -- too I � I — i — � I o —I-S� I I i DoorL I -- ' I i 161, o I S I I I II I), I ! 1 ! I I f I � i I i , i i I i t 1 1 I I I I i t I III I II II , I I s , 4S- nO I --. I �, f In . 71 1I I _ I 1 of ! a - I I A l i I 77-1-IT-1 1t ( I I I 9 tiel 71 I I j 1 ' I I 0 �O 0 Z1 , zG I =--�- II I1 -� 111 , 1 »mss I ic`I�ld Z1100�� c-4 �,wwnS S 1 I � I � i C I , i I i I ! I o° ys b 0 cgOy\a�� Dowd � � CV-4 \,4 C-> S S 4 a5c� o }-1 30 30 � S �vP\3 7 QaS0 0-2.� � X i S Ti N G LLQ=V,4, -k C) S I D E O � 1-10Iv 5 S� t Gid �O O� El 0 D Cx 1 s ri f,3& moo p- 00 Lli 1St��OG K /� D 1Ti OBJ o oip 0 31`T�S 35 noH 30 �da� E x i 5'7i O G E LEVA116 P fZEA�iZ 0(7 HOUSE 1. S Su►-.M'��5� OOT S�QLE 11 A I z t i p. r. IS;zUE-- 52-_1c� �gC aitg of Salem, �RU!55nrlluscite s �nttrd of 'Teal H4R 3 2 44 r C:I Y U; �L! R.C'S G;r I-14�'S DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIATCOEHLO,REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT' 15 SUMMIT STREET(R-1) A hearing on this petition was held February 18, 1998 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Richard Dionne and Paul Valaskagis. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit from non-conforming structure to enlarge a second floor bedroom for the property located at 15 Summit Street. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes , enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change , extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. :n more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests , guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Petitioner would like to enlarge the second floor bedroom. 2. Petitioner states he has a growing family and needs the extra space. 3. Mr. Blanchette, of 6 Summit Street appeared to speak in favor of this petition. 4 . There was no opposition to this petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: J DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COEHLO REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET page two 1 . The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2 . All construction shall be done as per plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Inspector . 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5 . Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmonv with the existing structure. Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 7 . Petitioner is to obtain approval from anv City Board of Co-,: ission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED February 16, 1999 ^�- Paul Valaskagis, Member Board of Appeal DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COEHLO REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET page three COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED b'ITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title Board of Appeal 1 ofttlem, � usstttljusetts Paura of rAppeal SEP Zb 3 15 t"li '95 4y DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COELHO RE&tk8TTNG:%Li ??.. LiASS A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREEf< i(R-'1:)OriiCr A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 1995 with the following Board members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Albert Hill, Nina Cohen, Joseph Ywuc and Arthur LeBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owners of the property request a Variance to enlarge non conforming structure at roof level on east side of the property located at 15 Summit Street (R-1) . The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioners have owner the property for 4 years and their family is growing larger. 2. The Ward 4 Councillor O'Leary spoke in favor of the petition. 3. There was no opposition to the request. 4. The plans call for adding a dormer on the east side of the structure. 5. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and allow a fuller use of the property. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. J; DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COELHO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET (R-1) SEP 26 3 15 h! '35 page two CI f Y Of CAL[M. MASS Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 tolgyae't' Aja C( variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 5. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted September 20, 1995 ® �\ Stephen Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section.J.1 the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect unfit copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk tw! days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such dopw been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is. recorded in the-squib Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal of Salem, 'Massadjusetts �3oarb of Av Fenl SEP Zb 3 is f ti '35 4y... DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COELHO RE&0k8T'ING,%i.; ',':. MA;S A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREE2< <Qt -'hJ0ii !CF A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 1995 with the following Board members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Albert Hill, Nina Cohen, Joseph Ywuc and Arthur LeBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owners of the property request a Variance to enlarge non conforming structure at roof level on east side of the property located at 15 Summit Street (R-1) . The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioners have owner the property for 4 years and their family is growing larger. 2. The Ward 4 Councillor O'Leary spoke in favor of the petition. 3. There was no opposition to the request. 4. The plans call for adding a dormer on the east side of the structure. 5. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and allow a fuller use of the property. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating, from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COELHO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET (R-1) SEP Z6 3 1S P�i v95 page two CIiY Of SALt 4, MASS Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to�gaht' NEP(%l variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 5. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted September 20, 1995 Stephen Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section J-1 'tete Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect unfit copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk t�!"t;. days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such d0ow . been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the Swim Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal of Salem, 'T' ttssadjusetts P >�... uttrd of ett� SEP 6 315 f l '315 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COELHO RE0-$8TTNG,%' iP, MASS A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREEf k i(V1,)0 i i I C F A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 1995 with the following Board members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Albert Hill, Nina Cohen, Joseph Ywuc and Arthur LeBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owners of the property request a Variance to enlarge non conforming structure at roof level on east side of the property located at 15 Summit Street (R-1) . The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioners have owner the property for 4 years and their family is growing larger. 2. The Ward 4 Councillor O'Leary spoke in favor of the petition. 3. There was no opposition to the request. 4. The plans call for adding a dormer on the east side of the structure. 5. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and allow a fuller use of the property. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to. the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating,,from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MARIA COELHO REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15 SUMMIT STREET (R-1) SEP Z6 3 15 Fri `95 page two C11Y I Of ALC H. MASS Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 4,6' r' tOAJICF variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 5. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 6. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted September 20, 1995p�� Stephen Touchette, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section.J. Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect un copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk t , days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such 1-1 � been filed,- that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in. th!>Spuf.'h Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal JOB SITE COPY CITY OF SALEM BUILDING ti lac SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT DATE JUNE 12 19 96 PERMIT NO, 17,—SSE, APPLICANT OWNER/GEORGE COELHO ADDRESS 15 SUMMIT ST OWNER (NO.) (STREET) (CONTR'S LICENSE) CITY SALEM STATE MA ZIPCODE 019710 TEL.NO. 5088 74i-2846 PERMIT TO ADDITION O STORY ONE FAMILY NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 1 (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) N0. (PROPOSED USE) AT(LOCATION) 0015 SUMMIT STREET ZONING DTRICT - (NO.) (STREET) BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION MAP 15 Lor 01 EZ5 BLOCK SIZE 0006430 SO FT BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: BUILD 2101X61 2ND FL ADDITION -,, RAISE ROOF ENLARGE 2 RMS AS DER PLANS.AREAOR VOLUME L ESTIMATED ST� Il PERMIT VOLUME ' w ( QII=� (CUBIC/SQUARE FEET) FEE $ GS, 100 OWNER COELFiO GEORGE M BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS 15 SUMMIT ST By L. E. T THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY,ENCROACHMENTS ` ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION,STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL INSPECTIONS APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS CARD KEPT WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK: POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HASBEEN MADE. WHERE A PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND 2.PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS C 2 v60� 2 2 It o i3-3 a � ivy/ . BOARD OF HEALTH GAS INSPECTION APPROVALS FIRE DEPT.INSPECTING APPROVALS 1 OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 2 CERTIFI ATE OF OCCUPANCY Issued: ao 9c Permit#: d 21,24 WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. AS NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION. Jc_ _